Page last updated: 2024-11-08

tacrolimus

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Tacrolimus: A macrolide isolated from the culture broth of a strain of Streptomyces tsukubaensis that has strong immunosuppressive activity in vivo and prevents the activation of T-lymphocytes in response to antigenic or mitogenic stimulation in vitro. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

tacrolimus (anhydrous) : A macrolide lactam containing a 23-membered lactone ring, originally isolated from the fermentation broth of a Japanese soil sample that contained the bacteria Streptomyces tsukubaensis. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID445643
CHEMBL ID66247
CHEMBL ID269732
CHEBI ID61057
CHEBI ID61049
CHEBI ID93221
SCHEMBL ID3088
MeSH IDM0025261

Synonyms (137)

Synonym
AC-1182
bdbm50030448
bdbm50079777
(e)-(1r,9s,12s,13r,14r,21s,23s,24r,25s,27r)-17-allyl-1,14-dihydroxy-12-[(e)-2-((3r,4r)-4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-cyclohexyl)-1-methyl-vinyl]-23,25-dimethoxy-13,19,21,27-tetramethyl-11,28-dioxa-4-aza-tricyclo[22.3.1.0*4,9*]octacos-18-ene-2,3,10,16-tetraone
chembl66247
BRD-K35452788-001-02-1
(3s,4r,5s,8r,9e,12s,14s,15r,16s,18r,19r,26as)-5,19-dihydroxy-3-{(1e)-1-[(1r,3r,4r)-4-hydroxy-3-methoxycyclohexyl]prop-1-en-2-yl}-14,16-dimethoxy-4,10,12,18-tetramethyl-8-(prop-2-en-1-yl)-5,6,8,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,24,25,26,26a-hexadecahydro-3h-15,19
CHEBI:61057 ,
BSPBIO_001279
hecoria
advagraf
l-679934
graceptor
protopy
talymus
fujimycin
protopic
lcp-tacro
modigraf
tsukubaenolide
l 679934
15,19-epoxy-3h-pyrido(2,1-c)(1,4)oxaazacyclotricosine-1,7,20,21(4h,23h)-tetrone, 5,6,8,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,24,25,26,26a-hexadecahydro-5,19-dihydroxy-3-(2-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxycyclohexyl)-14,16-dimethoxy-4,10,12,18-tetramethyl-8-(2-propenyl)-, (3s-(3
tacrolimus [usan]
(-)-fk 506
ccris 7124
tacrolimus (anhydrous)
prograf (tn)
IDI1_001040
fr900506
prograf
dimethoxy-4,10,12,18-tetramethyl-8-(2-propenyl)-,(3s,4r,5s,8r,12s,14s,15r,16s,18r,19r,26as)-
[(e)-2-[(1r,3r,4r)-4-hydroxy-3-methoxycyclohexyl]-1-methylethenyl]-14,16-
fr-900506
8-deethyl-8-[but-3-enyl]-ascomycin
4,5,6,8,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,24,25,26,26a-heptadecahydro-5,19-dihydroxy-3-
15,19-epoxy-3h-pyrido[2,1-c][1,4]oxaazacyclotricosine-1,7,20,21(23h)-tetrone,
fk506
C01375
fk 506
tacrolimus
k506
tacrolimus, anhydrous
DB00864
tacrolimus anhydrous
anhydrous tacrolimus
NCGC00163470-02
nsc717865
NCGC00163470-01
NCGC00163470-03
NCGC00163470-04
prograft
LMPK04000003
HMS2093M19
HMS1990O21
nsc-758659
chebi:61049 ,
CHEMBL269732 ,
AKOS005145901
D08556
tacrolimus (inn)
HMS1792O21
HMS503O21
NCGC00163470-06
NCGC00163470-07
NCGC00163470-05
astagraf xl
unii-wm0haq4wnm
nsc 758659
avagraf
hsdb 8195
unii-y5l2157c4j
tacrolimus [usan:inn]
envarsus xr
envarsus
y5l2157c4j ,
dtxcid3026354
tox21_112056
dtxsid5046354 ,
cas-104987-11-3
pharmakon1600-01503968
nsc758659
M2258
15,19-epoxy-3h-pyrido[2,1-c][1,4]oxaazacyclotricosine-1,7,20,21(4h,23h)-tetrone, 5,6,8,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,24,25,26,26a-hexadecahydro-5,19-dihydroxy-3-[(1e)-2-[(1r,3r,4r)-4-hydroxy-3-methoxycyclohexyl]-1-methylethenyl]-14,16-dimethoxy-4,10,12,18-te
tacrolimus [mart.]
tacrolimus [mi]
tacrolimus [who-dd]
tacro
prograph
tacrolimus [inn]
S5003
fk-506 (tacrolimus)
gtpl6784
AB01209746-01
HY-13756
CS-1507
AM81227
15,19-epoxy-3h-pyrido[2,1-c][1,4]oxaazacyclotricosine-1,7,20,21(4h,23h)-tetrone, 5,6,8,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,24,25,26,26a-hexadecahydro-5,19-dihydroxy-3-[(1e)-2-[(1r,3r,4r)-4-hydroxy-3-methoxycyc
lohexyl]-1-methylethenyl]-14,16-dimethoxy-4,10,12,18-tetramethyl-8-(2-propen-1-yl)-, (3s,4r,5s,8r,9e,12s,14s,15r,16s,18r,19r,26as)-
SCHEMBL3088
QJJXYPPXXYFBGM-LFZNUXCKSA-N
Q-201775
(3s,4r,5s,8r,9e,12s,14s,15r,16s,18r,19r,26as)-5,6,8,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,24,25,26,26a-hexadecahydro-5,19-dihydroxy-3-[(1e)-2-[(1r,3r,4r)-4-hydroxy-3-methoxycyclohexyl]-1-methylethenyl]-14,16-dimethoxy-4,10,12,18-tetramethyl-8-(2-propen-1-yl)-15,19-e
c44h69no12.h2o
HB0289
HMS3403O21
tacrolimus (fk506)
AB01209746_03
mfcd00869853
CHEBI:93221
SR-05000001879-2
sr-05000001879
SR-05000001879-1
SBI-0052894.P002
(3s,4r,5s,8r,9e,12s,14s,15r,16s,18r,19r,26as)-5,19-dihydroxy-3-{(e)-2-[(1r,3r,4r)-4-hydroxy-3-methoxycyclohexyl]-1-methylethenyl}-14,16-dimethoxy-4,10,12,18-tetramethyl-8-prop-2-en-1-yl-5,6,8,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,24,25,26,26a-hexadecahydro-3h-15,19-
EX-A1677
SR-05000001879-5
Q411648
BRD-K69608737-001-03-7
(3s,4r,5s,8r,9e,12s,14s,15r,16s,18r,19r,26as)-5,6,8,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,24,25,26,26a-hexadecahydro-5,19-dihydroxy-3-[(1e)-2-[(1r,3r,4r)-4-hydroxy-3-methoxycyclohexyl]-1-methylethenyl]-14,16-dimethoxy-4,10,12,18-tetramethyl-8-(2-propen-1-yl)-15,19
BRD-K69608737-001-10-2
CCG-270494
NCGC00163470-27
(1r,9s,12s,13r,14s,17r,18e,21s,23s,24r,25s,27r)-1,14-dihydroxy-12-[(e)-1-[(1r,3r,4r)-4-hydroxy-3-methoxycyclohexyl]prop-1-en-2-yl]-23,25-dimethoxy-13,19,21,27-tetramethyl-17-prop-2-enyl-11,28-dioxa-4-azatricyclo[22.3.1.04,9]octacos-18-ene-2,3,10,16-tetron
EN300-221601
(1r,9s,12s,13r,14s,17r,21s,23s,24r,25s,27r)-1,14-dihydroxy-12-{1-[(1r,3r,4r)-4-hydroxy-3-methoxycyclohexyl]prop-1-en-2-yl}-23,25-dimethoxy-13,19,21,27-tetramethyl-17-(prop-2-en-1-yl)-11,28-dioxa-4-azatricyclo[22.3.1.0,4,9]octacos-18-ene-2,3,10,16-tetrone
15,19-epoxy-3h-pyrido[2,1-c][1,4]oxaazacyclotricosine-1,7,20,21(4h,23h)-tetrone, 5,6,8,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,24,25,26,26a-hexadecahydro-5,19-dihydroxy-3-[(e)-2-[(1r,3r,4r)-4-hydroxy-3-methoxycycl ohexyl]-1-methylethenyl]-14,16-dimethoxy-4,10,12,18-te
tacrolimusum
tacrolimus monohydrate (ep monograph)
l04ad02
tacrolimus (usp monograph)
tacrolimus (usp-rs)
8-deethyl-8-(but-3-enyl)-ascomycin
tacrolimus (mart.)
d11ah01
envarsus-xr
Z2242006187
tacrolimus in whole human blood

Research Excerpts

Overview

Tacrolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressant widely used to prevent rejection after solid organ transplantation. It is an effective and safe therapeutic alternative for approximately 60% of patients with JIA.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Tacrolimus (Tacro) is a potent immunosuppressant and a central agent in the prevention of posttransplantation rejection. "( In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
Caron, P; Guillemette, C; Harvey, M; Laverdière, I; Lévesque, É, 2011
)
2.04
"tacrolimus. This study is a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation at Michigan Medicine between June 1, 2014, and March 1, 2018, who received i.v."( Impact of Pharmacogenetics on Intravenous Tacrolimus Exposure and Conversions to Oral Therapy.
Frame, D; Gersch, CL; Hertz, DL; Kidwell, KM; Li, Y; Marcath, LA; Nguyen, V; Pasternak, AL; Rae, JM; Scappaticci, G, 2022
)
1.71
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressant widely used to prevent rejection after solid organ transplantation. "( Tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity from bipolar disorder to status epilepticus under the therapeutic serum level: a case report.
Cheon, SM; Jin, B; Kim, GY, 2021
)
3.51
"Tacrolimus is a narrow therapeutic index drug with high pharmacokinetic variability, and several tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models were developed to guide individualized drug dosing. "( Predictive Performance of Published Tacrolimus Population Pharmacokinetic Models in Thai Kidney Transplant Patients.
Leelakanok, N; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J; Onlamai, K, 2022
)
2.44
"Tacrolimus is a second-line immunosuppressant in myasthenia gravis (MG) therapy, which is mainly used in combination with corticosteroids to reduce steroid dose and maintain the effect of immunotherapy. "( Tacrolimus as Single-Agent Immunotherapy and Minimal Manifestation Status in Nonthymoma Myasthenia Gravis.
Duan, W; Jin, W; Ouyang, S; Peng, Y; Yang, H, 2021
)
3.51
"Tacrolimus is an effective and safe therapeutic alternative for approximately 60% of patients with JIA."( Tacrolimus as an alternative treatment for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Akutsu, Y; Mori, M; Shimbo, A; Shimizu, M; Yamazaki, S, 2022
)
3.61
"Tacrolimus is an oral and relatively inexpensive drug, which has been extensively used in Japan for steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent disease."( Tacrolimus as rescue therapy for steroid-dependent/steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: Experience from tertiary referral center in India.
Puri, AS; Sachdeva, S; Sud, S, 2021
)
2.79
"Tacrolimus is a P-gp inhibitor and hence, may overcome this resistance."( Tacrolimus induces remission in refractory and relapsing lupus nephritis by decreasing P-glycoprotein expression and function on peripheral blood lymphocytes.
Agarwal, V; Edavalath, S; Gupta, L; Gupta, V; Mishra, R; Misra, DP; Rai, MK, 2022
)
2.89
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is an immunosuppressant with large interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and a narrow therapeutic index. "( Rapid clearance of tacrolimus blood concentration triggered by variant pharmacogenes.
Borić-Bilušić, A; Božina, N; Canjuga, I; Ganoci, L; Šimičević, L; Zibar, L, 2022
)
2.49
"Tacrolimus is a common immunosuppressive for transplantation. "( CYP3a5 Genetic Polymorphism in Chinese Population With Renal Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis Review.
Cao, P; Sun, Z; Wang, W; Yu, B; Zhang, F; Zhang, J; Zheng, X, 2022
)
2.16
"Tacrolimus is an important immunosuppressant produced by microbial fermentation. "( Modification of nanoscale polymeric adsorbent for the preparative separation and purification of tacrolimus from fermentation broth of Streptomyces tsukubaensis.
Chen, ZQ; Cheng, X; Ju Lin, X; Lian, YY; Wang, DS; Yan, LB; Yang, HJ; Zhang, ZL; Zhou, JM, 2022
)
2.38
"Tacrolimus ointment is a recently developed topical immunomodulator that has been approved for use in patients with vitiligo older than 2 years. "( Impacts of exposure to topical calcineurin inhibitors on metabolism in vitiligo infants.
Hu, W; Lei, J; Lin, F; Xu, AE, 2023
)
2.35
"Tacrolimus is a widely prescribed immunosuppressant agent for kidney transplantation. "( Influence of CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3 combined genotypes on tacrolimus dose requirements in Egyptian renal transplant patients.
Ebid, AIM; ELSharkawy, M; Ismail, DA; Lotfy, NM; Mahmoud, MA, 2022
)
2.41
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an immunosuppressant drug (ISD) used to prevent organ rejection after transplantation that exhibits a narrow therapeutic window and is subject to wide inter- and intra-individual pharmacokinetic fluctuations requiring careful monitoring. "( Biosensing Tacrolimus in Human Whole Blood by Using a Drug Receptor Fused to the Emerald Green Fluorescent Protein.
Benito-Peña, E; Caminati, G; Canales, Á; Glahn-Martínez, B; Lucchesi, G; Manzano, AI; Moreno-Bondi, MC; Pradanas-González, F, 2022
)
2.55
"Tacrolimus (Tac) is a common immunosuppressant that used in organ transplantation. "( The effect of tacrolimus-induced toxicity on metabolic profiling in target tissues of mice.
Dang, R; Guo, J; Han, W; Li, Y; Meng, J; Si, Q; Wang, S; Wei, N; Wu, L; Xie, D, 2022
)
2.52
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide antibiotic that as a specific inhibitor of T-lymphocyte function and has been used widely as an immunosuppressant in human organ transplantation."( Tacrolimus ameliorates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by inhibiting M2 macrophage polarization via JAK2/STAT3 signaling.
Chen, R; Gao, S; Huang, H; Jiang, Q; Li, X; Liu, B; Liu, X; Shao, C; Xia, Q; Yang, C; Zhang, F; Zhou, H; Zhu, J, 2022
)
2.89
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an immunosuppressive agent and has toxic side effects such as nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and neurotoxicity. "( Protective effect of silymarin on tacrolimus-induced kidney and liver toxicity.
Ciftci, MK; Terzi, F, 2022
)
2.44
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant widely used in transplantations requiring mandatory concentration-controlled dosing to prevent acute rejection or adverse effects, including new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM). "( Longitudinal Exposure to Tacrolimus and New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Renal Transplant Patients.
Destere, A; Marquet, P; Monchaud, C; Premaud, A; Woillard, JB, 2023
)
2.66
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is an immunosuppressive drug that is widely used for patients who underwent liver transplantation. "( Donor and recipient polymorphisms of MAPK signaling pathway genes influence post-transplant liver function in Chinese liver transplant patients taking tacrolimus.
Li, Z; Niu, W; Qiu, X; Wu, Z; Zheng, X; Zhong, M, 2023
)
2.55
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is a very effective medication in routine use after solid organ transplantation. "( An idiosyncratic reaction of unilateral common peroneal nerve palsy associated with below desired therapeutic range of tacrolimus level in a patient postheart transplantation.
Abhisek, PA; Pradhan, SS; Srivastava, A,
)
1.78
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressant drug commonly used after solid organ transplant surgery. "( Phenomenology and Physiology of Tacrolimus Induced Tremor.
Cagle, J; Hisham, I; Lunny, C; Malea, J; Santos, A; Shukla, AM; Wagle Shukla, A, 2023
)
2.64
"Tacrolimus is a powerful macrolide calcineurin inhibitor that has low adverse effects which lead to a rapid response in the control of signs and symptoms in comparison to that of corticosteroids in Oral Lichen Planus(OLP). "( Efficacy and Safety of Topical Tacrolimus in Comparison with Topical Corticosteroids, Calcineurin Inhibitors, Retinoids and Placebo in Oral Lichen Planus: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bhor, K; Manoj, R; Pinto, J; Samson, S; Santosh, V; Waghmare, M, 2023
)
2.64
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor with a narrow therapeutic range and is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes CYP3A4 and CYP3A5. "( Implementation of Clinical Cytochrome P450 3A Genotyping for Tacrolimus Dosing in a Large Kidney Transplant Program.
Chen, J; Eadon, MT; Maddatu, JP; Nikirk, MG; Sharfuddin, AA; Shugg, T; Skaar, TC; Tillman, E, 2023
)
2.59
"Tacrolimus is an important immunosuppressant used in the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG). "( Population PK/PD model of tacrolimus for exploring the relationship between accumulated exposure and quantitative scores in myasthenia gravis patients.
Chen, D; Chen, W; Hou, S; Jin, P; Tian, X; Yang, L; Yao, Q; Yin, J; Zhang, H; Zhao, M; Zhou, T, 2023
)
2.65
"Tacrolimus is an independent risk factor for new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT). "( Endoplasmic reticulum stress in the adipose tissue and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 are involved in tacrolimus-induced diabetes mellitus.
Che, K; Chi, J; Sun, X; Wang, H; Wang, Y, 2023
)
2.57
"Tacrolimus is a CYP3A4 substrate with a narrow therapeutic index that requires dose adjustment when used with voriconazole, a recognized CYP3A4 inhibitor. "( It cuts both ways: A single-center retrospective review describing a three-way interaction between flucloxacillin, voriconazole and tacrolimus.
Burrows, FS; Carlos, LM; Marriott, DJE; Stojanova, J, 2023
)
2.56
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant largely used in heart transplantation. "( Tacrolimus population pharmacokinetics in adult heart transplant patients.
Destere, A; Labriffe, M; Marquet, P; Monchaud, C; Paschier, A; Woillard, JB, 2023
)
3.8
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor used to prevent rejection in allogenic solid organ transplant recipients, which is metabolized in the liver with cytochrome P450 isoforms 3A4 and 3A5 (CYP3A4, CYP3A5). "( Safety analysis of co-administering tacrolimus and omeprazole in renal transplant recipients - A review.
Idasiak-Piechocka, I; Miedziaszczyk, M, 2023
)
2.63
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a 23-membered macrolide with immunosuppressant activity that is widely used clinically for treating the rejection after organ transplantation. "( [Biosynthesis of immunosuppressant tacrolimus: a review].
Jin, L; Liu, Z; Lu, D; Wang, X; Xing, M; Zheng, Y, 2023
)
2.63
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive drug with many side effects including nephrotoxicity and post-transplant diabetes mellitus. "( Individualized dosing algorithms for tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: current status and unmet needs.
de Winter, BCM; Francke, MI; Hesselink, DA; Reinders, MEJ; Sassen, SDT; Schagen, MR; Volarevic, H,
)
1.85
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is a drug from natural origin that can be used for topical application to control autoimmune skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and vitiligo. "( Computational simulation on the study of Tacrolimus and its improved dermal retention using Poly(Ԑ-caprolactone) nanocapsules.
Camargo, GDA; Camilo Junior, A; Dias, DT; Farago, PV; Khan, IA; Lara, LS; Majumdar, S; Manfron, J; Mendes Nadal, J; Mendes, MB; Novatski, A; Semianko, BC, 2024
)
3.15
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a macrolide lactone immunosuppressive drug that is commonly used in transplanted patients to avoid organ rejection. "( Magnetic Janus micromotors for fluorescence biosensing of tacrolimus in oral fluids.
Benito-Peña, E; Escarpa, A; Glahn-Martínez, B; Jurado-Sánchez, B; Moreno-Bondi, MC, 2024
)
3.13
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant drug largely used in liver and renal transplantations."( Behavioral and immunotoxic effects of Prograf® (tacrolimus) in the male Siamese fighting fish.
Brown, C; Forsatkar, MN; Javanshir Khoei, A, 2019
)
1.49
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is an immunosuppressant for preventing solid-organ transplant rejection. "( In vitro selection of tacrolimus binding aptamer by systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment method for the development of a fluorescent aptasensor for sensitive detection of tacrolimus.
Abnous, K; Mansouri, A; Nabavinia, MS; Ramezani, M; Taghdisi, SM, 2020
)
2.32
"Tacrolimus is a nephrotoxic immunosuppressant historically monitored via enzyme-based immunoassay (IA). "( Tacrolimus trough monitoring guided by mass spectrometry without accounting for assay differences is associated with acute kidney injury in lung transplant recipients.
Ahearn, P; Blanc, PD; Calabrese, DR; Chong, T; De Marco, T; Florez, R; Golden, J; Greenland, JR; Hays, SR; Henricksen, E; Isaak, K; Kleinhenz, ME; Kolaitis, NA; Kukreja, J; Leard, LE; Lei, HL; Martinez, E; Shah, RJ; Singer, JP; Venado, A, 2019
)
3.4
"Tacrolimus (Tac) is a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). "( Effect of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 Gene Polymorphisms on Tacrolimus Blood Concentration in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Çolak, E; Kaltuş, Z; Şahin, G; Yildirim, E, 2019
)
2.21
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug. "( C/D Ratio in Long-Term Renal Function.
Ciechanowski, K; Domańki, L; Drozd-Dabrowska, M; Gryczman, M; Kwiatkowska, E; Kwiatkowski, S; Marchelk-Myśliwiec, M; Wahler, F, 2019
)
1.96
"Tacrolimus is a suitable alternative in these cases."( Resolution of papilledema associated with cyclosporine use after change to tacrolimus.
Kwok, JM; Micieli, JA; Yu, CW, 2019
)
1.47
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant agent utilized for solid organ transplantations. "( Delayed tacrolimus-induced optic neuropathy.
Al Malik, YM; Alnahdi, MA, 2019
)
2.39
"Tacrolimus is a potential treatment option in patients intolerant of steroidal drugs."( Treatment of serologically negative Sjögren's syndrome with tacrolimus: A case report.
Huang, F; Pan, X; Pan, Z; Tian, M, 2020
)
1.52
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug widely used in kidney transplantation. "( CYP3A5 gene polymorphisms and their impact on dosage and trough concentration of tacrolimus among kidney transplant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Abid, A; Firasat, S; Khan, AR; Raza, A, 2020
)
2.23
"Tacrolimus is a novel effective immunosuppressant for myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. "( Multiple genetic factors affecting the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes of tacrolimus in Chinese myasthenia gravis patients.
Dong, XH; Jin, WL; Li, X; Li, Y; Li, ZB; Luo, ZH; Meng, HY; Peng, YY; Xu, LQ; Xu, Q; Yan, CK; Yang, H, 2020
)
2.22
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor commonly used for prophylaxis of rejection in renal and liver transplantation. "( Tacrolimus induces short-term but not long-term clinical response in inflammatory bowel disease.
Aguirre, U; Benítez, JM; Cañete, F; Casanova, MJ; Castro-Poceiro, J; Clos-Parals, A; Elorza, A; Fernández-Clotet, A; Ferreiro-Iglesias, R; García, MJ; Gisbert, JP; Gordillo, J; López-García, A; López-Sanromán, A; Márquez, L; Martín, E; Matallana, V; Merino, O; Mesonero, F; Nantes, Ó; Pérez-Galindo, P; Rodríguez-Lago, I; Taxonera, C; Vicente, R; Vicuña, M, 2020
)
3.44
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug with a narrow therapeutic index and larger interindividual variability. "( A Machine Learning-Based Identification of Genes Affecting the Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus Using the DMET
Choi, Y; Gim, JA; Kim, S; Kim, YK; Kwon, Y; Lee, H; Lee, HA; Lee, KR, 2020
)
2.23
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor that has been used to prevent allograft rejection after organ transplantation. "( [A Case of Breast Cancer Treated with Adjuvant Chemotherapy in a Patient Receiving Tacrolimus Medication after Liver Transplantation].
Kotake, T; Lin, X; Nakakimura, T; Torii, M; Yoshibayashi, H, 2020
)
2.23
"Tacrolimus is a new type immunosuppressant. "( Topical tacrolimus with different frequency for exfoliative cheilitis: a pilot study.
Jiang, WW; Liu, LJ; Sun, C; Xu, P; Zhang, QQ, 2022
)
2.6
"Tacrolimus (Tac) is an effective anti-rejection agent in kidney transplantation, but its off-target effects make withdrawal desirable. "( Distinct peripheral blood molecular signature emerges with successful tacrolimus withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients.
Anderson, L; Brouard, S; Cravedi, P; Fribourg, M; Hartzell, S; Heeger, PS; Nudelman, G; Yi, Z; Zaslavsky, E; Zhang, W, 2020
)
2.23
"High tacrolimus CV is a risk factor for acute rejection and graft loss; these results offer the potential promise of improved medication adherence and clinical outcomes through the use of innovative technology."( Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of an mHealth Medication Adherence Intervention on Tacrolimus Trough Concentration Variability: Post Hoc Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Chandler, JL; McGillicuddy, JW; Sox, LR; Taber, DJ, 2020
)
1.3
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is a powerful remission-inducing drug for refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). "( Relationship between mucosal healing by tacrolimus and relapse of refractory ulcerative colitis: a retrospective study.
Ito, A; Murasugi, S; Nakamura, S; Omori, T; Tokushige, K, 2020
)
2.27
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide lactone and potent immunosuppressant. "( Stability characterization, kinetics and mechanism of tacrolimus degradation in cyclodextrin solutions.
Eiriksson, FF; Loftsson, T; Prajapati, M, 2020
)
2.25
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent which selectively inhibits T cell activation."( Tacrolimus ameliorates thrombocytopenia in an ITP mouse model.
Ding, Y; Ju, W; Lai, R; Lu, J; Luo, Q; Qiao, J; Tong, H; Wang, X; Wei, G; Xu, K; Xu, X; Yan, Z; Zeng, L; Zhang, S; Zhou, J, 2020
)
2.72
"Tacrolimus (Tac) is a key immunosuppressive agent in the prevention of liver rejection after transplantation."( Roles of BATF/JUN/IRF4 complex in tacrolimus mediated immunosuppression on Tfh cells in acute rejection after liver transplantation.
Liu, X; Tang, T; Xu, T; Yang, T; Yang, Z; Zhang, L, 2021
)
1.62
"Tacrolimus is a well-known potent but expensive immunosuppressant. "( Co-administration of Wuzhi tablet (Schisandra sphenanthera extract) alters tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in a dose- and time-dependent manner in rats.
Bi, HC; Chen, X; Huang, M; Li, JL; Qin, XL; Wang, SH, 2020
)
2.23
"Tacrolimus is a mainstay medication for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in combination with other immunosuppressive agents. "( Initial tacrolimus weight-based dosing strategy in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.
Al-Homsi, AS; Cirrone, F; Lewis, T; Papadopoulos, J; Soskind, R; Xiang, E, 2021
)
2.5
"Tacrolimus is a promising potential agent to prevent PEP but needs further clinical study."( Emerging Therapies to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.
Kochman, ML; Thiruvengadam, NR, 2020
)
1.28
"Tacrolimus is an immunomodulatory drug, available for topical and systemic treatment of several dermopathies that are characterized by immune dysregulation. "( Occlusive treatment enhances efficacy of tacrolimus 0.1% in a pediatric patient with severe alopecia areata: Case report and literature review.
Bimbi, C; Kyriakou, G; Wollina, U, 2021
)
2.33
"Tacrolimus is a prominent drug for immunosuppression and is suspected to cause pure red cell aplasia during the posttransplant period; therefore, clinicians should consider a switch from tacrolimus to another immunosuppressive agent."( Tacrolimus-Associated Pure Red Cell Aplasia in a Patient With Renal Transplant.
Akkaya, B; Alemdar, MS; Kocak, H; Suleymanlar, G; Yilmaz, VT; Yucel, OK, 2022
)
2.89
"Tacrolimus is a narrow therapeutic index medication, which requires therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize dosing based on systemic exposure. "( Validation of a Capillary Dry Blood Sample MITRA-Based Assay for the Quantitative Determination of Systemic Tacrolimus Concentrations in Transplant Recipients.
Aluvihare, V; Anaokar, S; Dawson, I; Hussain, I; Kamar, N; Kazeem, G; Saliba, F; Torpey, N; Undre, N, 2021
)
2.28
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is a key immunosuppressant drug for kidney transplantation (KTx). "( Influence of a low-dose tacrolimus protocol on the appearance of de novo donor-specific antibodies during 7 years of follow-up after renal transplantation.
Furusawa, M; Hirai, T; Ishida, H; Kakuta, Y; Kitajima, K; Nitta, K; Okumi, M; Omoto, K; Shimizu, T; Tanabe, K; Toki, D; Unagami, K, 2021
)
2.37
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor used to prevent acute graft versus host disease in adult patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). "( Evaluation of the performance of a prior tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic kidney transplant model among adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.
Armistead, PM; Campagne, O; Crona, DJ; Flynn, G; Mager, DE; Miller, JA; Patel, T; Ptachcinski, JR; Suzuki, O; Torrice, CD; Weiner, DL; Wiltshire, T; Zhu, J, 2021
)
2.33
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is an immunosuppressant widely prescribed following an allogenic organ transplant. "( Unraveling the Genomic Architecture of the CYP3A Locus and ADME Genes for Personalized Tacrolimus Dosing.
Cho, Y; Choi, S; Ha, J; Jang, IJ; Kim, BJ; Kim, HK; Kim, MS; Kim, YJ; Lee, MG; Min, S; Moon, S; Oh, J; Park, JB; Shin, HS; Song, SH; Yang, CW; Yang, J; Yoon, HE; Yoon, JG, 2021
)
2.29
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is an immunosuppressive drug, optimally used for liver, kidney, and heart transplant to avoid immune rejection. "( Effect of Short-Term Tacrolimus Exposure on Rat Liver: An Insight into Serum Antioxidant Status, Liver Lipid Peroxidation, and Inflammation.
Akhtar, T; Ambreen, S; Ashfaq, I; Fatima, N; Jha, BK; Oghumu, S; Ryan, N; Satoskar, AR; Sheikh, N; Tayyeb, A, 2021
)
2.38
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive treatment especially used in organ transplant, potentially inducer of hypomagnesemia by renal loss."( Calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) in a liver transplant patient: are hypomagnesemia, tacrolimus or both guilty? A case-based literature review.
Cadiou, S; De Saint-Riquier, M; Giguet, B; Guennoc, X; Guggenbuhl, P; Le Gruyer, A; Milin, M; Robin, F, 2022
)
1.66
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug. "( Evaluation of the Effect of Captopril and Losartan on Tacrolimus-induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats.
Abeyat, H; Behmanesh, MA; Poormoosavi, SM; Sangtarash, E, 2021
)
2.31
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is a first-line immunosuppressant which is used to prevent transplant rejection after solid organ transplantation (SOT). "( Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing guidelines for tacrolimus co-administration with Wuzhi capsule in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Fu, Q; Hou, X; Jiao, Z; Jing, Y; Kong, Y; Liu, H; Peng, H; Wei, X, 2021
)
2.3
"Tacrolimus is a routinely used immunosuppressant agent after liver transplantation, with a well-known neurotoxic profile."( Functional Improvement of Tacrolimus-Induced Parkinsonism With Amantadine After Liver Transplantation: A Case Report.
Diaz-Segarra, N; Edmond, A; Yonclas, P,
)
1.15
"Tacrolimus (TAC, FK506) is a major calcineurin inhibitor and has been commonly used in treatments of patients with organ transplants and immune diseases. "( Tacrolimus inhibits oral carcinogenesis through cell cycle control.
Chen, W; Cheng, B; Hu, Q; Li, J; Li, Y; Ling, Z; Wang, Y; Wu, T; Xia, J; Zhang, L, 2021
)
3.51
"Tacrolimus (Tac) is an effective remission inducer of refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). "( The impact of cytochrome P450 3A genetic polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in ulcerative colitis patients.
Fujiwara, Y; Fukunaga, S; Furuse, M; Hosomi, S; Itani, S; Kamata, N; Nadatani, Y; Nagami, Y; Nishida, Y; Otani, K; Taira, K; Tanaka, F; Watanabe, K; Watanabe, T, 2021
)
2.31
"Tacrolimus is a core component of immunosuppressive regimens. "( Kinetics of generic tacrolimus in heart transplantation: A cautionary note.
Hsich, EM; Il'Giovine, ZJ; Lever, H; Mason, RP; Mehra, MR; Sherratt, SCR; Starling, RC; Williams, JB, 2021
)
2.39
"Tacrolimus is an essential immunosuppressant for successful allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT). "( Switching from Intravenous to Oral Tacrolimus Reduces its Blood Concentration in Paediatric Cancer Patients.
Asakura, Y; Chiba, T; Endo, M; Goto, S; Hirai, D; Ito, S; Kudo, K; Miura, S; Nihei, S; Nishiya, N; Oyake, T; Ujiie, H, 2021
)
2.34
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor widely used for immunological disorders. "( Anticancer Effects of Tacrolimus on Induced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Mice.
Abdelghany, EMA; Ali, AI; Hussein, S; Mahmoud, SS; Rashed, H, 2022
)
2.48
"Tacrolimus is a natural macrolide that exhibits an anti-proliferative action by T-lymphocytic cells inhibition. "( Tacrolimus-loaded chitosan nanoparticles for enhanced skin deposition and management of plaque psoriasis.
Abdel-Mottaleb, MMA; Arafa, MG; El-Zaafarany, GM; Fereig, SA, 2021
)
3.51
"Tacrolimus is a common immunosuppressant used in solid organ transplant recipients. "( Histologic Features of Tacrolimus-induced Colonic Injury.
Hissong, E; Mostyka, M; Yantiss, RK, 2022
)
2.47
"Oral tacrolimus is a therapeutic agent for moderate to severe steroid-dependent or resistant ulcerative colitis (UC), but remission induction is difficult, and it is necessary to treat the patient while considering the next treatment."( Early serum albumin changes in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with tacrolimus will predict clinical outcome.
Furuta, T; Hamaya, Y; Ishida, N; Iwaizumi, M; Miyazu, T; Osawa, S; Sugimoto, K; Tamura, S; Tani, S; Yamade, M, 2021
)
1.36
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is a powerful immunosuppressive agent whose therapeutic applicability is confined owing to its systemic side effects."( Potential Privilege of Maltodextrin-α-Tocopherol Nano-Micelles in Seizing Tacrolimus Renal Toxicity, Managing Rheumatoid Arthritis and Accelerating Bone Regeneration.
Abdelmonsif, DA; Aly, RG; El-Fakharany, EM; Helal, HM; Kamoun, EA; Mortada, SM; Sallam, MA; Samy, WM, 2021
)
2.29
"Tacrolimus is a narrow therapeutic index drug, requiring consistent levels to maximize transplant success while reducing adverse effects. "( Impact of tacrolimus variability on pediatric heart transplant outcomes.
Griffiths, E; Heyrend, C; Masotti, S; Molina, K; Ou, Z; Sirota, M, 2021
)
2.47
"Tacrolimus seems to be a valid therapeutic alternative for the induction of remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis."( EFFICACY OF TACROLIMUS FOR INDUCTION OF REMISSION IN PATIENTS WITH MODERATE-TO-SEVERE ULCERATIVE COLITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
Lasa, J; Olivera, P,
)
1.95
"Tacrolimus is an emerging candidate for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory ocular disorders (IIODs) however its ocular delivery remained a challenge due to its hydrophobic nature, high molecular weight and physiological and anatomical constraints of the eye. "( Proglycosomes: A novel nano-vesicle for ocular delivery of tacrolimus.
Garg, V; Jain, GK; Kohli, K; Suri, R, 2017
)
2.14
"Oral tacrolimus is an effective drug that induces clinical remission in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis refractory to steroids. "( Medium to long-term efficacy and safety of oral tacrolimus in moderate to severe steroid refractory ulcerative colitis.
Amo Trillo, V; González Grande, R; Jiménez Pérez, M; Olmedo Martín, RV, 2017
)
1.22
"Tacrolimus variability is a significant explanatory variable for disparities in AA recipients."( Tacrolimus Trough Concentration Variability and Disparities in African American Kidney Transplantation.
Baliga, PK; Dubay, D; Fleming, JN; Mauldin, PD; McGillicuddy, JW; Moran, WP; Posadas-Salas, MA; Srinivas, TR; Su, Z; Taber, DJ; Treiber, FA, 2017
)
2.62
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent that is widely used in organ transplant recipients."( Clinical Evaluation of Modified Release and Immediate Release Tacrolimus Formulations.
Alloway, RR; Tremblay, S, 2017
)
1.42
"Tacrolimus is a potent, narrow therapeutic index, immunosuppressive drug used to avoid organ rejection in patients that have undergone organ transplantation. "( Dissolution Test of Tacrolimus Capsule: Effects of Filtration and Glass Adsorption.
Gao, Z; Jiang, W; Trehy, M; Zeng, K, 2018
)
2.25
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug that inhibits the release of inflammatory cytokines involved in rheumatoid arthritis development by blocking T cell activation. "( Tacrolimus regulates endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated osteoclastogenesis and inflammation: In vitro and collagen-induced arthritis mouse model.
Choi, Y; Jeong, JH; Kim, HR; Kim, JH; Lee, EG; Lee, WS; Yoo, WH, 2018
)
3.37
"Tacrolimus is a potent but expensive first-line immunosuppressant, thus solutions to reduce tacrolimus consumption while maintain therapeutic level are in urgent need. "( Wuzhi Tablet (
Bi, H; Chen, S; Fu, Q; Huang, M; Li, J; Liu, L; Qin, X; Wang, C; Wang, X; Zhang, Y, 2017
)
1.9
"Tacrolimus (Tac) is an immunosuppressive drug that is used in preventing organ and tissue rejection in patients after transplantation. "( Tacrolimus: A Review of Laboratory Detection Methods and Indications for Use.
Kalt, DA, 2017
)
3.34
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a chemotherapeutic agent, which uses calcineurin pathway via inhibiting the stimulation of T cells to prevent the formation of immune response in the recipient individual in organ transplants. "( Antagonistic Effect of Oxytocin and Tacrolimus Combination on Adipose Tissue - Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Antagonistic effect of oxytocin and tacrolimus.
Biray Avci, C; Cavusoglu, T; Goker Bagca, B; Gunduz, C; Sir, G; Uyanikgil, Y; Yigitturk, G, 2018
)
2.2
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent well known to be capable of producing renal impairment. "( Acute right heart failure caused by tacrolimus after renal transplantation: Serial observation by speckle tracking and Doppler echocardiography.
DeMaria, AN; Igata, S; Sabet, A; Wettersten, N; Wong, DJ, 2017
)
2.17
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressant."( Mechanistic insights into topical tacrolimus for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.
Furue, M; Morimoto, H; Murakami, N; Nakahara, T, 2018
)
1.48
"Tacrolimus is an FDA-approved immunosuppressive drug with known neuroprotective and neuroregenerative properties in the CNS."( An Elastomeric Polymer Matrix, PEUU-Tac, Delivers Bioactive Tacrolimus Transdurally to the CNS in Rat.
Conner, I; Faust, AE; Feturi, F; Gorantla, VS; Gu, X; Leonard, B; Roy, S; Steketee, MB; van der Merwe, Y; Venkataramanan, R; Wagner, WR; Washington, KM; Zhao, W, 2017
)
1.42
"Tacrolimus is a powerful immunosuppressive drug which is used to minimize the risk of organ rejection."( Tacrolimus induced nephrotoxicity and pulmonary toxicity in Wistar rats.
Akhtar, T; Ghazanfar, R; Shan, T; Sheikh, N,
)
2.3
"Tacrolimus is a conventional medication for the treatment of vitiligo, but the effect of a single medication is limited."( Preliminary study on the treatment of vitiligo with carbon dioxide fractional laser together with tacrolimus.
Chen, W; Huang, FR; Luo, D; Wang, DG; Zhou, Y, 2018
)
2.14
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is an immunosuppressive drug used after organ transplantation. "( Longitudinal Study of Tacrolimus in Lymphocytes During the First Year After Kidney Transplantation.
Andersen, AM; Bergan, S; Bremer, S; Daleq, L; Klaasen, RA; Midtvedt, K; Skauby, MH; Vethe, NT, 2018
)
2.24
"Tacrolimus is a cornerstone of immunosuppression after transplantation but is highly susceptible to changes from interacting variables and has a narrow therapeutic index. "( Effects of clotrimazole troches on tacrolimus dosing in heart transplant recipients.
Boilson, B; Crow, SA; Dierkhising, R; Laub, MR; Personett, HA; Razonable, R, 2018
)
2.2
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is an important drug for inflammatory diseases. "( Long-lasting immunosuppressive effects of tacrolimus-loaded micelle NK61060 in preclinical arthritis and colitis models.
Aijima, T; Fuchigami, K; Hara, K; Hara, S; Hayashi, H; Hayashi, T; Ichimura, E; Igo, N; Kawano, K; Kikitsu, A; Kobayashi, Y; Konno, J; Mori, M; Niwa, M; Ogawa, Y; Saiga, K; Sato, T; Sekiguchi, A; Takashima, Y; Yamamoto, K; Yoneki, N, 2018
)
2.19
"Tacrolimus is an important immunosuppressive agent with high intra- and inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability and a narrow therapeutic index. "( The potential impact of hematocrit correction on evaluation of tacrolimus target exposure in pediatric kidney transplant patients.
Bootsma-Robroeks, CMHHT; Brüggemann, RJM; Burger, DM; Cornelissen, EAM; de Wildt, SN; Schijvens, AM; Schreuder, MF; Ter Heine, R; van Hesteren, FHS, 2019
)
2.2
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an immunosuppressive drug used mainly to lower the risk of organ rejection after allogeneic organ transplant."( Tetrahydrocurcumin Ameliorates Tacrolimus-Induced Nephrotoxicity Via Inhibiting Apoptosis.
Jang, HJ; Kim, HJ; Lee, JH; Oh, MY; Park, CS, 2018
)
1.49
"Tacrolimus is an inhibitor of the phosphatase calcineurin, an action shared with cyclosporine."( The Immunosuppressant Macrolide Tacrolimus Activates Cold-Sensing TRPM8 Channels.
Arcas, JM; Bech, F; Belmonte, C; Demirkhanyan, L; Gers-Barlag, K; Gomis, A; González, A; González-González, O; Viana, F; Zakharian, E, 2019
)
1.52
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is a promising salvage agent."( A review of the utility of tacrolimus in the management of adults with autoimmune hepatitis.
Ascha, M; Ascha, MS; Chedid, A; Hanouneh, IA; Hanouneh, M; Ritchie, MM; Sanguankeo, A; Zein, NN, 2019
)
1.53
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant used topically on the skin in atopic dermatitis."( Tacrolimus ointment in the management of atopic keratoconjunctivitis.
Bauvin, O; Benaim, D; Delcampe, A; Gueudry, J; Joly, P; Muraine, M; Tétart, F, 2019
)
2.68
"Tacrolimus (TAC) acts as an inhibitor of calcineurin, which inhibits the production of interleukin-2. "( Targeted delivery of tacrolimus to T cells by pH-responsive aptamer-chitosan- poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanocomplex.
Abnous, K; Alibolandi, M; Mansouri, A; Ramezani, M; Taghdisi, SM, 2019
)
2.28
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant used in cutaneous application in atopic dermatitis."( [Tacrolimus ointment in the management of atopic keratoconjunctivitis].
Bauvin, O; Benaim, D; Delcampe, A; Gueudry, J; Joly, P; Muraine, M; Tétart, F, 2019
)
2.15
"Tacrolimus is a narrow therapeutic range drug that requires fine dose adjustment, for which pharmacokinetic (PK) models have been amply proposed in renal, but not in liver, transplant recipients. "( Population pharmacokinetic model and Bayesian estimator for 2 tacrolimus formulations in adult liver transplant patients.
Debord, J; Marquet, P; Monchaud, C; Riff, C; Woillard, JB, 2019
)
2.2
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor that has recently been used in the treatment of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis."( Tacrolimus Therapy in Steroid-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis: A Review.
Ran, Z; Tong, J; Wu, B, 2020
)
2.72
"Tacrolimus 0.03% is an effective alternative to dexamethasone 0.05% with low recurrence rate, no significant rise in IOP but may cause burning and foreign body sensation in some patients."( Comparison of the safety and efficacy of topical Tacrolimus (0.03%) versus dexamethasone (0.05%) for subepithelial infiltrates after adenoviral conjunctivitis.
Bhargava, R; Kumar, P, 2019
)
2.21
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is an immunosuppressant drug given to kidney transplant recipients post-transplant to prevent antibody formation and kidney rejection. "( Comparison of a time-varying covariate model and a joint model of time-to-event outcomes in the presence of measurement error and interval censoring: application to kidney transplantation.
Campbell, KR; Cooper, J; Davis, S; Gralla, J; Grunwald, GK; Juarez-Colunga, E, 2019
)
1.96
"Tacrolimus is an important part of immunosuppressive therapy after solid organ transplantation. "( [Tacrolimus therapy after renal transplantation.
Kalmár Nagy, K; Szakály, P; Varga, Á, 2019
)
2.87
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressant used for prevention of allograft rejection in organ transplantation and metabolized in the liver and intestine by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) enzyme. "( Cytochrome P450 3A4FNx011B as pharmacogenomic predictor of tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and clinical outcome in the liver transplant recipients.
Albekairy, A; Alkatheri, A; Fujita, S; Hemming, A; Howard, R; Karlix, J; Reed, A,
)
1.82
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug used for the prevention of the allograft rejection in kidney transplant recipients. "( Multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2/ABCC2) haplotypes significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.
Akhlaghi, F; Chitnis, SD; Christians, U; Gohh, RY; Ogasawara, K, 2013
)
2.04
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a widely used immunosuppressive drug. "( Tacrolimus (FK506) prevents early stages of ethanol induced hepatic fibrosis by targeting LARP6 dependent mechanism of collagen synthesis.
Blackmon, J; Manojlovic, Z; Stefanovic, B, 2013
)
3.28
"Tacrolimus (TAC) retard is a new oral formulation of TAC that is given once instead of twice daily. "( Clinical outcome in cardiac transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus retard.
Ensminger, S; Fuchs, U; Gummert, J; Hakim-Meibodi, K; Schulz, U; Schulze, B; Zittermann, A, 2013
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus (FK-506) is a potent immunomodulating agent, which has been used to treat AD."( 850nm light-emitting-diode phototherapy plus low-dose tacrolimus (FK-506) as combination therapy in the treatment of Dermatophagoides farinae-induced atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in NC/Nga mice.
Cheong, KA; Kim, CH; Lee, AY, 2013
)
1.36
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a potent, narrow therapeutic index, immunosuppressive drug used to avoid organ rejection in patients that have undergone organ transplantation. "( Analyses of marketplace tacrolimus drug product quality: bioactivity, NMR and LC-MS.
Berendt, RT; Boyne, MT; Ghasriani, H; Keire, DA; Pang, ES; Sommers, CD; Vilker, VL, 2013
)
2.14
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive agent with limited corneal penetration. "( Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and ocular tolerance of a microemulsion containing tacrolimus.
da Silva, GR; de Castro, WV; Fialho, SL; Silva-Cunha, A, 2014
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug used to prevent acute rejection following organ transplantation and to treat autoimmune disease. "( Pneumocystis pneumonia induced by treatment with low-dose tacrolimus and methylprednisolone in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis: a case report.
Fujimoto, Y; Ienaga, H; Kato, M; Kobayashi, I; Sugano, K; Takahashi, K; Tobino, K; Tokuda, H, 2013
)
2.08
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant frequently used following solid organ transplantation, including renal transplantation. "( Tacrolimus-induced encephalopathy and polyneuropathy in a renal transplant recipient.
Balaraman, V; Weng, FL; Wu, G, 2013
)
3.28
"Tacrolimus is a widely used immunosuppressant after organ transplantation. "( Association of hemoglobin levels, CYP3A5, and NR1I3 gene polymorphisms with tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in liver transplant patients.
Chen, D; Fan, J; Guo, F; Peng, Z; Shi, J; Wang, Z; Zhang, C, 2014
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant used for the prevention of kidney allograft rejection. "( The influence of comedication on tacrolimus blood concentration in patients subjected to kidney transplantation: a retrospective study.
Bokonjic, D; Dragojevic-Simic, V; Draskovic-Pavlovic, B; Ignjatovic, L; Mikov, M; Rancic, N; Vavic, N, 2014
)
2.13
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a calcineurin inhibitor with a narrow therapeutic index that exhibits large interindividual variation. "( Pharmacogenotyping of CYP3A5 in predicting dose-adjusted trough levels of tacrolimus among Malaysian kidney-transplant patients.
Ahmad, G; Hamzah, S; Salleh, MZ; Siew, JS; Teh, LK; Wong, HS; Zakaria, ZA, 2014
)
2.08
"Tacrolimus (Tac) is an immunosuppressive drug widely used to avoid organ rejection. "( Mitochondrial DNA haplogroups and risk of new-onset diabetes among tacrolimus-treated renal transplanted patients.
Coto, E; Díaz-Corte, C; Gómez, J; Llobet, L; Ortega, F; Ruiz-Pesini, E; Tavira, B, 2014
)
2.08
"Tacrolimus (FK-506) is an immunosuppressant widely used to prevent kidney transplant rejection. "( [Pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus: from bench to bedside?].
Coronel, D; Coto, E; Díaz-Corte, C; Ortega, F; Tavira, B, 2014
)
2.16
"Tacrolimus is a widely used immunosuppressive drug for preventing the rejection of solid organ transplants. "( Impact of the CYP3A5, CYP3A4, COMT, IL-10 and POR genetic polymorphisms on tacrolimus metabolism in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Jiang, HX; Li, CJ; Li, L; Li, WM; Lin, L; Tan, XH; Zhang, YJ; Zheng, P; Zhong, ZY; Zhou, L, 2014
)
2.08
"Tacrolimus (Tac) is an immunosuppressive drug with a narrow therapeutic width and highly variable pharmacokinetics. "( Gender-dependent predictable pharmacokinetic method for tacrolimus exposure monitoring in kidney transplant patients.
Catic-Djordjevic, A; Cvetkovic, T; Mikov, M; Mitic, B; Paunovic, G; Stefanovic, N; Velickovic-Radovanovic, R, 2015
)
2.11
"Tacrolimus is an established immunosuppressant used for the prevention and treatment of allograft rejection in solid organ transplantation. "( Assessment of tacrolimus absorption from the human intestinal tract: open-label, randomized, 4-way crossover study.
Brown, M; Connor, A; First, R; Groenewoud, A; Higaki, K; Holman, J; Kawamura, A; Keirns, JJ; Murakami, M; Ogawara, K; Sako, K; Sawamoto, T; Tsunashima, D; Undre, N; Wilding, I; Wylde, H, 2014
)
2.21
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is a post-transplantation immunosuppressant drug used in patients for whom careful monitoring of TAC concentration is essential. "( Multi-center analytical evaluation of a novel automated tacrolimus immunoassay.
Orth, M; Ramos, PA; Schneider, C; Shipkova, M; Verstraete, AG; Vogeser, M; Wallemacq, P, 2014
)
2.09
"Tacrolimus is an important immunosuppressant administered to patients following liver transplantation (LT), with a recommended trough concentration of 8 to 11 ng/mL to prevent allograft rejection. "( Tacrolimus-related adverse effects in liver transplant recipients: its association with trough concentrations.
Arikichenin, O; Jayanthi, V; Narasimhan, G; Perumalla, R; Reddy, MS; Rela, M; Shanmugam, N; Shanmugam, V; Srinivasan, V; Varghese, J; Venugopal, K, 2014
)
3.29
"Tacrolimus is a viable option in the treatment of children with idiopathic steroid resistant FSGS."( Efficacy of tacrolimus in the treatment of children with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.
Aviles, D; Kallash, M, 2014
)
2.22
"Tacrolimus is a low-molecular-weight, highly protein-bound drug with the potential to be removed during MARS therapy."( Impact of molecular adsorbent recirculating system therapy on tacrolimus elimination: a case report.
El-Zoghby, ZM; Frazee, EN; Larson, SL; Leung, N; Nyberg, SL; Personett, HA, 2014
)
1.36
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive property approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. "( Topical tacrolimus in the management of oral lichen planus: literature review.
Bhat, S; Kaul, R; Sanjay, CJ; Shilpa, PS; Sultana, N, 2014
)
2.28
"Tacrolimus (Tac) is a core immunosuppressive drug in human organ transplantation. "( Preliminary study of interaction of clarithromycin with tacrolimus in cats.
Katayama, M; Okamura, Y; Shimamura, S; Ushio, T; Uzuka, Y, 2014
)
2.09
"Tacrolimus intoxication is a rare event but may result in life-threatening complications. "( Rapid resolution of tacrolimus intoxication-induced AKI with a corticosteroid and phenytoin.
Bax, K; Filler, G; Rieder, MJ; Tijssen, J, 2014
)
2.17
"Tacrolimus is a CYP3A4 inhibitor and can alter colchicine metabolism. "( Colchicine levels in chronic kidney diseases and kidney transplant recipients using tacrolimus.
Amanova, A; Bakar, F; Caglayan, MG; Kendi Celebi, Z; Keven, K, 2014
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus is an effective (but relatively expensive) immunosuppressant that is used widely in patients with membranous nephropathy. "( Co-administration of Wuzhi capsules and tacrolimus in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: clinical efficacy and pharmacoeconomics.
Du, X; Ren, M; Sun, Z; Wu, Q, 2014
)
2.11
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is a known substrate for cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme. "( Interleukin-2 receptor antagonist therapy leads to increased tacrolimus levels after kidney transplantation.
Akhlaghi, F; First, MR; Henning, AK; Lin, S; Reisfield, R; Vergara-Silva, A, 2015
)
2.1
"Tacrolimus is an anticalcineurinic agent with potent immunosuppressive activity that has recently been shown to have the added benefit of reducing proteinuria in membranous nephropathy (MN) patients. "( The calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus reduces proteinuria in membranous nephropathy accompanied by a decrease in angiopoietin-like-4.
Chen, X; Cui, R; Li, B; Ma, J; Peng, L; Wei, QJ; Wei, SY, 2014
)
2.15
"Tacrolimus is a potent calcineurin inhibitor, an important pathway that regulates pancreatic development. "( Tacrolimus in pancreas transplant: a focus on toxicity, diabetogenic effect and drug-drug interactions.
Rangel, EB, 2014
)
3.29
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive agent mainly used for allogeneic solid organ transplantation. "( Ambrisentan improves the outcome of rats with liver transplantation partially through reducing nephrotoxicity.
Ding, GS; Fu, H; Fu, ZR; Gao, XG; Guo, WY; Han, QC; Ma, J; Ni, ZJ; Shi, XM; Song, SH; Wang, ZX; Zhang, L; Zou, Y, 2014
)
1.85
"Tacrolimus monotherapy is an effective and safe option for the treatment of MN with stable renal function. "( Predictors of response and relapse in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy treated with tacrolimus.
Agraz, I; Arroyo, D; Caro, J; Espinosa, M; Fernández, L; Frutos, MÁ; Goicoechea, M; Gutiérrez-Solís, E; Hernández, Y; Juárez, GF; Martín, M; Ocaña, J; Oliet, A; Perea, L; Praga, M; Rabasco, C; Ramos, N; Rojas-Rivera, J; Romera, A; Segarra, A; Valera, A, 2015
)
2.08
"Tacrolimus is an effective and safe immunosuppressive agent and it may be more cost-effective than cyclosporine for the primary prevention of graft rejection in renal transplant recipients."( Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine as Primary Immunosuppressant After Renal Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis and Economics Evaluation.
Guo, M; Li, J; Liu, D; Liu, JY; Xu, G; You, RX; Zeng, L; Zhou, P; Zhu, L,
)
2.3
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an immunosuppressive drug, which is widely used to prevent rejection of transplanted organs. "( Molecular mechanisms of FK506-induced hypertension in solid organ transplantation patients.
Chen, Q; Guo, R; Liu, S; Wang, J; Yang, M; Zuo, S; Zuo, X, 2014
)
1.85
"Tacrolimus is a cornerstone of the immunosuppression regimen for prevention of allograft rejection in kidney and liver transplantations, with efficacy proven in many clinical trials. "( Once-daily LCP-Tacro MeltDose tacrolimus for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in kidney and liver transplantations.
Grinyó, JM; Petruzzelli, S, 2014
)
2.13
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug that is used to lower the activity of the patient's immune system to prevent organ rejection. "( Case report: Inability to achieve a therapeutic dose of tacrolimus in a pediatric allogeneic stem cell transplant patient after generic substitution.
Madian, AG; Panigrahi, A; Perera, MA; Pinto, N, 2014
)
2.09
"Tacrolimus is an effective and safe immunosuppressive agent, and it may be more cost-effective than cyclosporine for the primary prevention of AR in renal transplant recipients."( Sirolimus Versus Tacrolimus as Primary Immunosuppressant After Renal Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis and Economics Evaluation.
Guo, M; Huang, F; Li, J; Liu, JY; Ma, BJ; Song, M; Xu, G; You, RX; Zhu, L,
)
1.19
"Tacrolimus is a product of fermentation of Streptomyces, and belongs to the family of calcineurin inhibitors. "( Tacrolimus in preventing transplant rejection in Chinese patients--optimizing use.
Li, CJ; Li, L, 2015
)
3.3
"Tacrolimus PR is a promising addition to the treatment options available for kidney and liver transplant recipients."( Tacrolimus prolonged release (Envarsus®): a review of its use in kidney and liver transplant recipients.
Garnock-Jones, KP, 2015
)
2.58
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent with a narrow therapeutic range that is commonly used in solid organ transplantation. "( Sublingual tacrolimus as an alternative to oral administration for solid organ transplant recipients.
Park, JM; Pennington, CA, 2015
)
2.25
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressor used to treat patients undergoing liver transplantation. "( An UPLC-MS/MS method coupled with automated on-line SPE for quantification of tacrolimus in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Brunati, A; Calvo, PL; D'Avolio, A; De Nicolò, A; Di Perri, G; Nonnato, A; Pensi, D; Pinon, M, 2015
)
2.09
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor primarily metabolized by CYP3A4 and secondarily by CYP3A5. "( Involvement of CYP 3A5 In the Interaction Between Tacrolimus and Nicardipine: A Case Report.
Gaies, E; Klouz, A; Lakhal, M; Salouage, I; Sassi, MB; Trabelsi, S, 2015
)
2.11
"Tacrolimus is an efficacious and cost-effective alternative to TCS, but its benefits need to be weighed against its still uncertain risk for malignancy. "( Systematic review on the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of topical calcineurin inhibitors in atopic dermatitis.
Chia, BK; Tey, HL,
)
1.57
"Tacrolimus is a pivotal immunosuppressant agent used in solid-organ transplantation. "( Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Solid-Organ Transplant Patients.
Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2015
)
2.13
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is a potent immunosuppressant used in experimental and clinical transplantation."( Roles of the tacrolimus-dependent transcription factor IRF4 in acute rejection after liver transplantation.
Liao, R; Liu, X; Lu, Q; Tang, T; Yang, X; Yang, Z; Zhang, Y, 2015
)
1.51
"Tacrolimus seems to be a safe drug that improves both muscle strength and lung function, and it is well tolerated by patients."( The efficacy of tacrolimus in patients with refractory dermatomyositis/polymyositis: a systematic review.
Ge, Y; Lu, X; Peng, Q; Shi, J; Wang, G; Ye, B; Zhou, H, 2015
)
1.48
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is an immunosuppressive macrolide that blocks T-cell activation by specifically inhibiting calcineurin. "( Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Add-On Tacrolimus in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Failed to Show an Adequate Response to Biological DMARDs: The Interim Results of a Specific Drug Use-Results Survey of Tacrolimus.
Ishida, K; Shiraki, K; Yoshiyasu, T, 2015
)
2.11
"Tacrolimus is a widely used immunosuppressive drug that inhibits the phosphatase calcineurin when bound to the 12 kDa FK506-binding protein (FKBP12). "( Renal Deletion of 12 kDa FK506-Binding Protein Attenuates Tacrolimus-Induced Hypertension.
Bachmann, S; Blankenstein, KI; Bleich, M; Ellison, DH; Himmerkus, N; Lazelle, RA; McCully, BH; Mutig, K; Terker, AS; Yang, CL, 2016
)
2.12
"Oral tacrolimus is an effective and safe option for the short-term treatment of severe plaque psoriasis."( Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Tacrolimus in Adult Patients With Refractory Severe Plaque Psoriasis.
Dogra, S; Mittal, A; Narang, T; Sharma, A, 2016
)
1.19
"Tacrolimus is a narrow therapeutic index drug and as such requires therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment based on its whole blood trough concentrations."( Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS.
Alloway, RR; Bodenberger, N; Christians, U; Gadpaille, H; Jiang, W; Schniedewind, B; Shokati, T; Vinks, AA, 2015
)
1.41
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is an immunosuppressant widely used in organ transplantation, but its extremely low aqueous solubility causes poor intestinal absorption. "( A rapid and sensitive method to determine tacrolimus in rat whole blood using liquid-liquid extraction with mild temperature ultrasonication and LC-MS/MS.
Cho, HR; Choi, YS; Kang, MJ; Park, JS, 2016
)
2.14
"Tacrolimus (Tac) is an immunosuppressant that inhibits translocation of nuclear factor of activated T cells and has therapeutic potential for pulmonary fibrosis. "( Therapeutic advantage of inhaled tacrolimus-bound albumin nanoparticles in a bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis mouse model.
Choi, HG; Hwang, HS; Kim, B; Lee, C; Lee, ES; Lim, JL; Oh, KT; Seo, J; Thao, le Q; Youn, YS, 2016
)
2.16
"Tacrolimus is a poorly water-soluble compound that is used to prevent allograft rejection. "( Preparation of extended release solid dispersion formulations of tacrolimus using ethylcellulose and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose by solvent evaporation method.
Higaki, K; Ogawara, K; Sako, K; Tsunashima, D; Yamashita, K, 2016
)
2.11
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a calcineurin inhibitor and is an essential component of many immunosuppressive regimens. "( Risk Factors for Subtherapeutic Tacrolimus Levels after Conversion from Continuous Intravenous Infusion to Oral in Children after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Bhatia, M; Garvin, JH; George, D; Jin, Z; Kahn, J; Kolb, M; Kung, AL; Offer, K; Satwani, P, 2016
)
2.16
"Tacrolimus (TL) ointment is a topical treatment for atopic dermatitis, a disease that exhibits various skin conditions. "( Effect of Physiological Changes in the Skin on Systemic Absorption of Tacrolimus Following Topical Application in Rats.
Egawa, Y; Hazama, Y; Maekawa, T; Miki, R; Morimoto, K; Oshima, S; Seki, T, 2016
)
2.11
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant agent that suffers from poor and variable bioavailability. "( Using Supercritical Fluid Technology (SFT) in Preparation of Tacrolimus Solid Dispersions.
Al Bustami, RT; Awad, AA; Obaidat, RM; Tashtoush, BM, 2017
)
2.14
"Tacrolimus is a 23-membered macrolide lactone with potent immunosuppressive activity that is effective in the prophylaxis of organ rejection following kidney, heart and liver transplantation. "( Effects of tacrolimus on morphology, proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from gingiva tissue.
Ha, DH; Jeong, JH; Kim, JO; Park, JB; Yong, CS, 2016
)
2.27
"Tacrolimus is a critical dose drug with a considerable intrapatient variability (IPV) in its pharmacokinetics. "( A high intrapatient variability in tacrolimus exposure is associated with poor long-term outcome of kidney transplantation.
Borra, LC; Hesselink, DA; Roodnat, JI; Shuker, L; Shuker, N; van Gelder, T; van Rosmalen, J; Weimar, W, 2016
)
2.15
"Tacrolimus (TCR) is an immunosuppressive drug used by oral administration. "( Sublingual administration improves systemic exposure of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: comparison with oral administration.
Apicella, L; Balletta, MM; Capone, D; Carrano, R; Federico, S; Mosca, T; Nappi, R; Russo, L; Sabbatini, M; Santangelo, M; Tarantino, G, 2016
)
2.12
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a 23-membered macrolide immunosuppressant used in current clinics. "( Target genes of the Streptomyces tsukubaensis FkbN regulator include most of the tacrolimus biosynthesis genes, a phosphopantetheinyl transferase and other PKS genes.
Martín, JF; Ordóñez-Robles, M; Rodríguez-García, A, 2016
)
2.1
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent that has been proposed in the treatment of severe ulcerative colitis. "( Tacrolimus Exerts Only a Transient Effectiveness in Refractory Pediatric Crohn Disease: A Case Series.
Guerriero, E; Hugot, JP; Martinez-Vinson, C; Truffinet, O; Viala, J, 2017
)
3.34
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive medication for organ transplantation. "( Impact of FOXP3 Polymorphisms on the Blood Level of Tacrolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Ge, J; Jing, Y; Li, G; Li, K; Wang, J; Zhao, H,
)
1.82
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor used in the prophylaxis of rejection after a solid organ transplant."( Previous exposure to biologics and C-reactive protein are associated with the response to tacrolimus in inflammatory bowel disease.
Aguirre, U; Cabriada, JL; Merino, O; Muñoz, C; Nantes, Ó; Rodríguez-Lago, I, 2016
)
1.38
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent, used in the remission induction therapy of ulcerative colitis (UC)."( The effect of CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms on adverse events in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with tacrolimus.
Andoh, A; Asada, A; Bamba, S; Imaeda, H; Inatomi, O; Morita, Y; Nishida, A; Sasaki, M; Sugimoto, M; Takahashi, K, 2017
)
2.11
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive agent widely used after organ transplantation. "( Sinus tachycardia related to tacrolimus after kidney transplantation in children and young adults.
Beşbaş, N; Bilginer, Y; Düzova, A; Erdoğan, İ,
)
1.87
"Tacrolimus is a commonly used immunosuppressive agent in organ transplant recipients. "( Development and validation of a sensitive and selective LC-MS/MS method for determination of tacrolimus in oral fluids.
Akhlaghi, F; Ghareeb, M, 2016
)
2.1
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant mainly used in the prophylaxis of solid organ transplant rejection. "( Development of a Simple and Rapid Method to Measure the Free Fraction of Tacrolimus in Plasma Using Ultrafiltration and LC-MS/MS.
de Lange, DW; Sikma, MA; Stienstra, NA; van Dapperen, AL; van Maarseveen, EM, 2016
)
2.11
"Tacrolimus immunotherapy is a valid option for the management of MG, and can be gradually reduced in dose once symptoms are improved until complete withdrawal is achieved."( Long-term efficacy and side effects of low-dose tacrolimus for the treatment of Myasthenia Gravis.
Chen, Y; Huang, X; Jing, F; Tao, X; Wang, W; Wang, Z; Wei, D, 2017
)
1.43
"Tacrolimus is a widely used macrolide immunosuppressant in transplant surgery, with mild and major neurologic side effects. "( Gangliocytoma Presenting With Tacrolimus Neurotoxicity in a Renal Transplant Recipient: Case Report.
Alagoz, S; Gulcicek, S; Oruc, M; Seyahi, N; Trabulus, S, 2016
)
2.17
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is a calcineurin inhibitor that is potent in cytokine suppression."( Tacrolimus improves proteinuria remission in adults with cyclosporine A-resistant or -dependent minimal change disease.
Bian, R; Gao, X; Mei, C; Xu, C; Xu, D, 2017
)
2.62
"Tacrolimus is a common immunosuppressive modality with a range of therapeutic applications, including for rheumatologic disease, nephrotic syndrome, and inflammatory bowel disease. "( Tacrolimus-associated Diffuse Gastrointestinal Ulcerations and Pathergy: A Case Report.
Kobashigawa, JA; Pan, D; Shaye, O,
)
3.02
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is a widely used immunosuppressant with a narrow therapeutic index and potential severe side effects, including neurotoxicity and kidney injury."( Red blood cell exchange as an approach for treating a case of severe tacrolimus overexposure.
Bianco, I; Biancofiore, G; Bindi, L; DeSimone, P; Mazzoni, A; Precisi, A; Spallanzani, V, 2017
)
1.41
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor used as an immunosuppressant drug in solid organ transplantation, and is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and CYP3A5. "( The Pharmacogenetics of Tacrolimus in Corticosteroid-Sparse Pediatric and Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Bergmann, TK; Brøsen, K; Madsen, MJ; Thiesson, HC, 2017
)
2.2
"Tacrolimus is an important immunosuppressive agent used to prevent allograft rejection after transplantation. "( Physiochemical properties of generic formulations of tacrolimus in Mexico.
First, MR; Iwabe, O; Kitamura, S; Mimura, H; Ohara, T; Petan, JA; Saito, K; Suzuki, M; Undre, N, 2008
)
2.04
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant widely used in recipients of solid organ transplants to prevent rejection. "( Acute tacrolimus toxicity in a non-transplant patient.
Mowry, J; O'Connor, AD; Rusyniak, DE, 2008
)
2.27
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is an effective primary immunosuppressive agent in kidney transplantation. "( Clinical and histological analysis of chronic tacrolimus nephrotoxicity in renal allografts.
Ishida, H; Omoto, K; Shimizu, T; Shirakawa, H; Tanabe, K; Yamaguchi, Y, 2008
)
2.05
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunomodulator that is effective in the systemic treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). "( Local application of tacrolimus in distal colitis: feasible and safe.
Bakker, EN; Kuipers, EJ; Nieuwenhuis, EE; Poen, AC; van Bodegraven, AA; van Dekken, H; van der Woude, CJ; van Dieren, JM, 2009
)
2.11
"Tacrolimus is an agent used in clinical immunosuppressive drug therapies. "( Effect of tacrolimus on activity and expression of P-glycoprotein and ATP-binding cassette transporter A5 (ABCA5) proteins in hematoencephalic barrier cells.
Cárcamo, JG; Claude, AA; Garrido, WX; González-Oyarzún, MA; Quezada, CA; Rauch, MC; Salas, MR; San Martín, RE; Slebe, JC; Yañez, AJ, 2008
)
2.19
"Tacrolimus is a widely used immunosuppressive drug in organ transplantation. "( Influence of CYP3A5 genetic polymorphism on tacrolimus daily dose requirements and acute rejection in renal graft recipients.
Becquemont, L; Charpentier, B; Durrbach, A; Ferlicot, S; Furlan, V; Letierce, A; Quteineh, L; Taburet, AM; Verstuyft, C, 2008
)
2.05
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive drug used in organ transplantation. "( Is the affinity column-mediated immunoassay method suitable as an alternative to the microparticle enzyme immunoassay method as a blood tacrolimus assay?
Ahn, HJ; Chang, HK; Huh, KH; Ju, MK; Kim, HJ; Kim, MS; Kim, SI; Kim, YS, 2008
)
1.99
"Tacrolimus (FK-506) is an immunosuppressant that binds to a specific immunophilin, resulting in the suppression of the cellular immune response during transplant rejection. "( Structural alterations in the seminiferous tubules of rats treated with immunosuppressor tacrolimus.
Caneguim, BH; Cerri, PS; Miraglia, SM; Sasso-Cerri, E; Spolidório, LC, 2009
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus is a substrate of cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A enzyme and of the drug transporter ABCB1. "( The effect of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on tacrolimus dose requirements in Caucasian liver transplant patients.
Biondi, F; D'Alessandro, N; Gridelli, B; Labbozzetta, M; Notarbartolo, M; Palazzo, U; Polidori, P; Poma, P; Provenzani, A; Sanguedolce, R; Triolo, F; Vizzini, G,
)
1.81
"Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment is a safe and effective second-line treatment for the control of moderate to severe AD of the face."( Superiority of tacrolimus 0.1% ointment compared with fluticasone 0.005% in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis of the face: results from a randomized, double-blind trial.
Doss, N; Dubertret, L; Fekete, GL; Kamoun, MR; Lahfa, M; Ortonne, JP; Reitamo, S, 2009
)
1.43
"Tacrolimus (FK-506) is a powerful immunosuppressive agent that modulates neutrophil infiltration during inflammation. "( Melatonin ameliorates tacrolimus (FK-506)'s induced immunosupressive effect in rat liver.
Ara, C; Karabulut, AB, 2009
)
2.11
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a macrolide immunosuppressant drug from the calcineurin inhibitor family, widely used in solid organ and islet cell transplantation, but produces significant side-effects."( Tacrolimus causes a blockage of protein secretion which reinforces its immunosuppressive activity and also explains some of its toxic side-effects.
Cárcamo, JG; Claude, A; Ojeda, D; Quezada, C; Rauch, MC; Salas, M; San Martín, A; Slebe, JC; Yañez, AJ, 2009
)
3.24
"Tacrolimus is a widely used T cell targeted immunosuppressive drug, known as a calcineurin inhibitor. "( Tacrolimus differentially regulates the proliferation of conventional and regulatory CD4(+) T cells.
Fujio, K; Kogina, K; Shoda, H; Takahashi, K; Tsuno, NH; Yamaguchi, Y; Yamamoto, K, 2009
)
3.24
"Tacrolimus is an alternative to cyclosporine when attempting to avoid GO in patients with kidney transplants."( Effectiveness of substituting cyclosporin A with tacrolimus in reducing gingival overgrowth in renal transplant patients.
Almendros-Marqués, N; Berini-Aytés, L; Gay-Escoda, C; Párraga-Linares, L, 2009
)
1.33
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug, used to prevent organ transplant rejection. "( Effect of low-dose tacrolimus coadministered with raloxifene on the skeletal system in male rats.
Cegieła, U; Folwarczna, J; Janiec, W; Kaczmarczyk-Sedlak, I; Nowińska, B; Pytlik, M; Sliwiński, L; Trzeciak, H; Trzeciak, HI,
)
1.9
"Tacrolimus is a substrate for P-glycoprotein, the product of the ABCB1 gene."( Effect of the ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism on tacrolimus concentrations and dosage requirements in liver transplant recipients.
Abbara, C; Bonhomme-Faivre, L; Chaunoy, M; Farinotti, R; Fodil, M; Picard, V; Saliba, F, 2009
)
1.34
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a potent immunosuppressant widely used for the treatment of patients with solid organ transplantation and autoimmune diseases. "( Cardiac and haemodynamic effects of tacrolimus in the halothane-anaesthetized dog.
Hoshiai, M; Kise, H; Nakamura, Y; Sugita, K; Sugiyama, A; Sugiyama, H, 2010
)
2.08
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressant that is frequently used in organ transplantation. "( Reversible myocardial hypertrophy induced by tacrolimus in a pediatric heart transplant recipient: case report.
Hashimoto, S; Ishibashi-Ueda, H; Kato, T; Mano, A; Nakatani, T; Wada, K; Yahata, Y, 2009
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunomodulator that is effective in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). "( Local immune regulation of mucosal inflammation by tacrolimus.
Kuipers, EJ; Lambers, ME; Nieuwenhuis, EE; Samsom, JN; van der Woude, CJ; van Dieren, JM, 2010
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive medication in the class of calcineurin inhibitors that acts by inhibiting T-cell and interleukin-2 activity, and is commonly used after allogeneic organ transplant. "( Visual loss associated with tacrolimus: case report and review of the literature.
Gibran, SK; Gonzales, JA; Kapoor, KG; Mirza, SN, 2010
)
2.1
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant drug currently used for the treatment of atopic dermatitis and pruritus. "( Mechanisms of the sensory effects of tacrolimus on the skin.
Boulais, N; Dorange, G; Lebonvallet, N; Misery, L; Pennec, JP; Pereira, U, 2010
)
2.08
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressant medication with a low therapeutic index. "( Mutism and persistent dysarthria due to tacrolimus-based immunosuppression following allogeneic liver transplantation.
Greenberg, MI; Simpson, SE; Vearrier, D, 2011
)
2.08
"Tacrolimus is a useful drug for the treatment of DM-IP in cases where Cy-A causes intolerable adverse reactions."( [Effective treatment of interstitial pneumonia with tacrolimus in a patient with dermatomyositis who was intolerant to cyclosporin-A].
Hanafusa, T; Kotani, T; Makino, S; Nuri, K; Shoda, T; Takeuchi, T, 2010
)
1.33
"Tacrolimus is a nonsteroidal alternative to treat noninfectious otitis externa (OE) in people. "( Safety and tolerability of 0.1% tacrolimus solution applied to the external ear canals of atopic beagle dogs without otitis.
Flynn-Lurie, AK; House, RA; Kelley, LS; Marsella, R; Simpson, AC, 2010
)
2.09
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is an immunosuppressant drug discovered in 1984 by Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. "( Tacrolimus-associated posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome after solid organ transplantation.
Chen, Y; Jeung, MY; Kessler, R; Lauer, V; Marescaux, C; Wolff, V; Wu, Q, 2010
)
3.25
"Tacrolimus is a novel immunomodulator for inflammatory bowel diseases. "( Immunosuppressive effects of tacrolimus on macrophages ameliorate experimental colitis.
Chiba, T; Honzawa, Y; Inui, K; Masuda, S; Matsumura, K; Nakase, H; Takeda, Y; Ueno, S; Uza, N; Yamamoto, S; Yoshino, T, 2010
)
2.09
"Tacrolimus is a commonly used immunosuppressive agent in renal transplantation. "( A systematic review of the effect of CYP3A5 genotype on the apparent oral clearance of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients.
Barry, A; Levine, M, 2010
)
2.03
"Tacrolimus is an important option for treatment of MG; however, careful management is needed for long-term treatment with this drug."( Five-year follow-up with low-dose tacrolimus in patients with myasthenia gravis.
Doi, S; Fujiki, N; Kikuchi, S; Minami, N; Niino, M; Sasaki, H; Shima, K, 2011
)
1.37
"Tacrolimus is a major immunosuppressant, which has a narrow therapeutic range and wide interindividual variation. "( CYP3A5 *1 allele: impacts on early acute rejection and graft function in tacrolimus-based renal transplant recipients.
Ahn, SH; Ha, J; Kim, SH; Kim, SJ; Kim, SY; Kim, YS; Min, SI; Min, SK; Moon, KC; Oh, JM, 2010
)
2.03
"Tacrolimus (Tac, FK506) is a widely used T-cell-targeted immunosuppression drug known as a calcineurin inhibitor. "( Effects and mechanisms of tacrolimus on development of murine Th17 cells.
Ding, GS; Fu, ZR; Kang, YD; Li, RD; Wang, ZX; Xiao, L; Zhang, XJ, 2010
)
2.1
"Tacrolimus (TRL) is an immunosuppressive drug characterized by a narrow therapeutic index, low bioavailability, and pharmacokinetic variability. "( Sublingual tacrolimus as an alternative to intravenous route in patients with thoracic transplant: a retrospective study.
Amrein, C; Billaud, EM; Boussaud, V; Collin, C; Glouzman, AS; Guillemain, R; Havard, L; Lefeuvre, S, 2010
)
2.19
"Tacrolimus is an immunomodulator that could be useful in treating keloid."( Intradermal tacrolimus prevent scar hypertrophy in a rabbit ear model: a clinical, histological and spectroscopical analysis.
Blondel, WC; Chassagne, JF; Gisquet, H; Guillemin, F; Latarche, C; Leroux, A; Liu, H; Merlin, JL; Peiffert, D, 2011
)
1.47
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant that undergoes therapeutic drug monitoring. "( The impact of a change in tacrolimus monitoring immunoassay techniques on clinical decision making.
Cavanaugh, TM; Martin-Boone, J; Neff, G; Parrish, N; Rudich, S, 2010
)
2.1
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressive agent, and tacrolimus ointment has been used as therapy for atopic dermatitis worldwide. "( Inhibitory potency of tacrolimus ointment on skin tumor induction in a mouse model of an initiation-promotion skin tumor.
Doi, Y; Kawabe, M; Lilja, H; Mitamura, T; Motomura, M; Oishi, Y; Seki, J; Yoshizawa, K, 2011
)
2.13
"Tacrolimus has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). "( One thousand consecutive primary liver transplants under tacrolimus immunosuppression: a 17- to 20-year longitudinal follow-up.
Cacciarelli, T; DeVera, ME; Fontes, P; Humar, A; Jain, A; Lopez, RC; Marsh, JW; Mazariegos, G; Sindhi, R; Singhal, A, 2011
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus (Tac) is an immunosuppressive drug used to prevent post-transplant (PT) organ rejection. "( Pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus after renal transplantation: analysis of polymorphisms in genes encoding 16 drug metabolizing enzymes.
Alvarez, V; Alvarezca, V; Arias, M; Campistol, JM; Coto, E; Díaz, JM; Díaz-Corte, C; Garciá, EC; López-Larrea, C; Ortega, F; Selgas, R; Tavira, B; Torres, A, 2011
)
2.14
"Tacrolimus is a substrate of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5. "( Impact of the CYP3A4*1G polymorphism and its combination with CYP3A5 genotypes on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in renal transplant patients.
Habuchi, T; Kagaya, H; Miura, M; Numakura, K; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Tsuchiya, N, 2011
)
2.04
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an immunosuppressive drug that binds to the immunophilin FKBPB12. "( The role of calcineurin/NFAT in SFRP2 induced angiogenesis--a rationale for breast cancer treatment with the calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus.
Bandhu Nepal, D; Caster, J; Courtwright, A; Darr, D; Hilliard, E; Ketelsen, D; Klauber-Demore, N; Patterson, C; Shen, XJ; Siamakpour-Reihani, S; Usary, J, 2011
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressant indicated for prophylaxis of transplant rejection. "( Bioequivalence of two tacrolimus formulations under fasting conditions in healthy male subjects.
Kale, P; Mandal, J; Mathew, P; Patel, K; Patel, R; Soni, K; Tangudu, G, 2011
)
2.13
"Tacrolimus is a cornerstone immunosuppressant agent in the prevention of organ rejection following transplantation. "( Once- versus twice-daily tacrolimus: are the formulations truly equivalent?
Barraclough, KA; Campbell, SB; Isbel, NM; Johnson, DW; Staatz, CE, 2011
)
2.12
"Tacrolimus is a widely used macrolide immunosuppressant that has a narrow therapeutic index and potential side effects including neurotoxicity. "( Red cell exchange transfusion as a rescue therapy for tacrolimus toxicity in a paediatric renal transplant.
Astley, P; Inward, C; Marriage, S; McCarthy, H; Tizard, EJ, 2011
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus (Tac) is a potent immunosuppressant with considerable toxicity. "( A new functional CYP3A4 intron 6 polymorphism significantly affects tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients.
Bouamar, R; Elens, L; Haufroid, V; Hesselink, DA; van der Heiden, IP; van Gelder, T; van Schaik, RH, 2011
)
2.05
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a widely used immunosuppressant in organ transplantation. "( The role of immunophilin ligands in nerve regeneration.
Birchall, MA; Seifalian, AM; Toll, EC, 2011
)
1.81
"Tacrolimus is a substrate of cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A) enzymes as well as of the drug transporter ABCB1. "( Influence of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 gene polymorphisms and other factors on tacrolimus dosing in Caucasian liver and kidney transplant patients.
Bertani, T; Caccamo, C; D'Alessandro, N; Gridelli, B; Labbozzetta, M; Notarbartolo, M; Palazzo, U; Polidori, P; Poma, P; Provenzani, A; Salis, P; Vizzini, G, 2011
)
2.04
"Tacrolimus is a topical calcineurin inhibitor with immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and fungicidal properties that may be beneficial in the treatment of facial seborrheic dermatitis."( Single-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the treatment of facial seborrheic dermatitis with hydrocortisone 1% ointment compared with tacrolimus 0.1% ointment in adults.
Clark, CS; Dahmer, B; Papp, A; Papp, KA, 2012
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant with a narrow therapeutic window, with considerable pharmacokinetic variability. "( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplantation: early posttransplantation clearance.
Bergstrand, M; Karlsson, MO; Nydert, PS; Staatz, CE; Wallin, JE; Wilczek, HE, 2011
)
2.1
"Tacrolimus is an effective and well-tolerated drug in cases of severe and refractory late-onset inflammatory reactions, including large panniculitis, that complicate silicone gel injections."( Tacrolimus in the treatment of chronic and refractory late-onset immune-mediated adverse effects related to silicone injections.
Alijotas-Reig, J; Garcia-Gimenez, V; Vilardell-Tarrés, M, 2012
)
3.26
"Tacrolimus is a well-known potent immunosuppressant agent, which has various drug-drug or food-drug interactions. "( Food-drug interaction of tacrolimus with pomelo, ginger, and turmeric juice in rats.
Egashira, K; Higuchi, S; Ieiri, I; Sasaki, H, 2012
)
2.13
"Tacrolimus ointment is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option in patients with AD in Asia. "( Overview of efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment in patients with atopic dermatitis in Asia and other areas.
Kim, KH; Kono, T, 2011
)
2.09
"Tacrolimus is a substrate of cytochrome P-450 3A enzyme and the drug transporter, P-glycoprotein."( Association between tacrolimus concentration and genetic polymorphisms of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 during the early stage after liver transplant in an Iranian population.
Aghdaie, MH; Azarpira, N; Banihashemi, M; Darai, M; Geramizadeh, B; Malekhosseini, SA; Malekpour, Z; Moini, M; Nikeghbalian, S; Rahsaz, M, 2012
)
1.42
"Tacrolimus is a substrate of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), encoded by the CYP3A and ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) genes, respectively. "( Impact of cytochrome P450 3A and ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 polymorphisms on tacrolimus dose-adjusted trough concentrations among Korean renal transplant recipients.
Cho, JH; Choi, JY; Kim, CD; Kim, YL; Park, JY; Park, SH; Song, EJ; Yoon, SH; Yoon, YD, 2012
)
2.04
"Tacrolimus is an established immunosuppressant for the prevention and treatment of allograft rejection in organ transplantation. "( Effect of conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus on glucose intolerance in stable kidney transplant recipients.
Deguchi, T; Ishida, K; Ito, S; Tsuchiya, T, 2012
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus (TCR) is a macrolide lactone with potent immunosuppressive activity."( Correlation of thermal analysis and pyrolysis coupled to GC-MS in the characterization of tacrolimus.
Böer, TM; Macêdo, RO; Nascimento, TG; Procópio, JV, 2013
)
1.33
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a macrolide T-cell immunomodulator used to treat myasthenia gravis (MG). "( Early effect of tacrolimus in improving excitation-contraction coupling in myasthenia gravis.
Hisahara, S; Hozuki, T; Imai, T; Kawamata, J; Motomura, M; Saitoh, M; Shimohama, S; Tsuda, E; Yamauchi, R; Yoshikawa, H, 2012
)
2.17
"Tacrolimus is a well-established immunosuppressive agent for the treatment and prevention of solid organ graft rejection. "( Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics of once- versus twice-daily formulations in de novo kidney transplantation: a substudy of a randomized phase III trial.
Abramowicz, D; Dickinson, J; Krämer, BK; Miller, D; Mourad, M; Oppenheimer, F; Ostrowski, M; Undre, N; Wlodarczyk, Z, 2012
)
3.26
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressant that has been demonstrated to inhibit T-lymphocyte activation without the side-effects of corticosteroids. "( Tacrolimus 0.1% vs mometasone furoate topical treatment in allergic contact hand eczema: a prospective randomized clinical study.
Kalogeromitros, D; Katsarou, A; Lagogianni, E; Makris, M; Papagiannaki, K; Tagka, A,
)
3.02
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressant that is safe and effective for the prevention of rejection after kidney transplantation. "( Relationship among changes in hematocrit, albumin and corticosteroid dose on the disposition of tacrolimus during the first six months following renal transplantation.
Domínguez-Ramírez, A; Fuentes-Noriega, I; González-López, EH; Mancilla-Urrea, E; Robles-Piedras, AL; Romano-Moreno, S, 2011
)
2.03
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor, and it is used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). "( Tacrolimus treatment increases bone formation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Ju, JH; Kang, KY; Kim, HY; Park, SH; Song, YW; Yoo, DH, 2013
)
3.28
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant macrolactam of fermentative origin. "( Evaluation, synthesis and characterization of tacrolimus impurities.
Colombo, D; De Mieri, M; Ferraboschi, P; Grisenti, P, 2012
)
2.08
"Tacrolimus is a commonly used immunosuppressant in solid organ transplantation recipients, but it is characterized by a narrow therapeutic range and large inter-individual variability. "( Prediction of the tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic parameters according to CYP3A5 genotype and clinical factors using NONMEM in adult kidney transplant recipients.
Ha, J; Han, N; Hong, JY; Hong, SH; Ji, E; Kim, IW; Kim, YS; Oh, JM; Shin, WG; Yun, HY, 2013
)
2.17
"Tacrolimus(PR) is a new prolonged-release once-daily formulation of the calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus, currently used in adult transplant patients. "( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of once daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients.
Baudouin, V; Deschênes, G; Fakhoury, M; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Maisin, A; Storme, T; Zhao, W, 2013
)
2.05
"Tacrolimus is an alternative to cyclosporine with a slightly different adverse effect profile."( Calcineurin inhibitors in chronic urticaria.
Khan, DA; Trojan, TD, 2012
)
1.1
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is a potent immunosuppressant used in liver transplantation. "( Preparation and biopharmaceutical evaluation of tacrolimus loaded biodegradable nanoparticles for liver targeting.
Afifi, N; Mathur, S; Tammam, S, 2012
)
2.08
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug essential for preventing organ rejection after transplantation. "( On-line solid-phase extraction high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the quantitative analysis of tacrolimus in whole blood hemolyzate.
Delmotte, N; Dülffer, T; Herrmann, R; Huber, CG; Kobold, U; Neu, V; von der Eltz, H, 2012
)
2.03
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant used in transplantation. "( Validation of tacrolimus equation to predict troughs using genetic and clinical factors.
Birnbaum, AK; Brundage, RC; Guan, W; Israni, AK; Jacobson, PA; Leduc, RE; Matas, AJ; Oetting, WS; Passey, C; Schladt, DP, 2012
)
2.18
"Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment is an effective alternative to topical steroid and may be considered as a first-line therapy in OLP."( Comparative efficacy of tacrolimus 0.1% ointment and clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment in oral lichen planus: a randomized double-blind trial.
Singal, A; Sonthalia, S, 2012
)
1.41
"Tacrolimus is a widely used immunosuppressive drug in organ transplantation. "( Influence of CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and MDR-1 polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and early renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients.
Cai, B; Li, Y; Shi, Y; Tang, J; Wang, L; Zhang, J; Zou, Y, 2013
)
2.08
"Tacrolimus is a commonly used immunosuppressive agent which causes cardiovascular complications, e.g., hypertension and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. "( Effects of tacrolimus on action potential configuration and transmembrane ion currents in canine ventricular cells.
Bányász, T; Hegyi, B; Horváth, B; Kistamás, K; Magyar, J; Nánási, PP; Pál, B; Ruzsnavszky, F; Szabó, L; Szentandrássy, N; Váczi, K, 2013
)
2.22
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is an immunosuppressant that has been widely used alone or in combination with prednisone (PRED) to prevent acute rejection after organ transplantation. "( Effect of long-term co-administration of Wuzhi tablet (Schisandra sphenanthera extract) and prednisone on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus.
Bi, HC; Gu, HM; Huang, M; Li, LJ; Qin, XL; Wang, Y; Wang, YT; Yu, T, 2013
)
2.04
"Oral tacrolimus is a safe and effective therapy for the treatment of moderate to severe UC in patients not receiving concomitant treatment with systemic steroids. "( The efficacy of oral tacrolimus in patients with moderate/severe ulcerative colitis not receiving concomitant corticosteroid therapy.
Abe, Y; Higuchi, K; Inoue, T; Ishida, K; Kawakami, K; Murano, M; Narabayashi, K; Nouda, S; Okada, T; Takeuchi, T; Tokioka, S; Umegaki, E, 2013
)
1.22
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an important macrocyclic polyketide showing antifungal and immunosuppressive activities, as well as neuroregenerative properties. "( Mutational biosynthesis of tacrolimus analogues by fkbO deletion mutant of Streptomyces sp. KCTC 11604BP.
Kim, DH; Lee, BM; Lee, KS; Lee, MO; Lim, SK; Maeng, PJ; Ryu, JH, 2013
)
2.13
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressant that has a narrow therapeutic index, displays considerable variability in response, and has the potential for serious drug interactions. "( Validation of methods to study the distribution and protein binding of tacrolimus in human blood.
Brown, KF; McLachlan, AJ; Nand, RA; Tattam, BN; Zahir, H,
)
1.81
"Tacrolimus is a drug for which therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended. "( Drug interactions with tacrolimus.
van Gelder, T, 2002
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppressant that has been widely used in the last decade. "( Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus: a moving matter.
Manzanares, C,
)
1.86
"Tacrolimus is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (PGP) encoded by the multidrug resistant (MDR)1 gene (ABCB1). "( Neurotoxicity induced by tacrolimus after liver transplantation: relation to genetic polymorphisms of the ABCB1 (MDR1) gene.
Higuchi, S; Ieiri, I; Kataoka, Y; Nishizaki, T; Oishi, R; Otsubo, K; Sugimachi, K; Tanabe, M; Yamauchi, A, 2002
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus is a potent inhibitor of immune mechanisms. "( [Drug of month. Topical tacrolimus (Protopic)].
Paquet, P; Piérard, GE; Piérard-Franchimont, C, 2002
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus is a superior immunosuppressive agent and has markedly improved the short-term outcome of renal allografts. "( Renin mRNA expression and renal dysfunction in tacrolimus-induced acute nephrotoxicity.
Iwai, T; Kuratsukuri, K; Matsumura, K; Naganuma, T; Nakatani, T; Sugimura, K; Uchida, J, 2003
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus (Protopic) is an immunosuppressive agent typically used systemically in transplant patients."( Topical tacrolimus: a new therapy for atopic dermatitis.
Russell, JJ, 2002
)
1.47
"Tacrolimus is a substrate for P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and cytochrome (CYP) P4503A. "( Tacrolimus dosing in pediatric heart transplant patients is related to CYP3A5 and MDR1 gene polymorphisms.
Bowman, P; Boyle, G; Burckart, GJ; Lamba, J; Law, Y; Miller, S; Schuetz, E; Webber, S; Zeevi, A; Zhang, J; Zheng, H, 2003
)
3.2
"Tacrolimus is a cornerstone immunosuppressive agent in renal transplantation and compared with cyclosporin, its use is associated with a reduced incidence of acute rejection. "( Tailoring tacrolimus-based immunotherapy in renal transplantation.
Yang, HC, 2003
)
2.16
"Tacrolimus therapy is a rare cause of MAHA in solid organ transplants but the diagnosis should be considered if there is an unexplained fall in haemoglobin and/or platelet count in the context of high serum tacrolimus levels."( Microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and thrombocytopenia following lung volume reduction surgery in a single lung transplant recipient on maintenance tacrolimus (FK506) therapy.
Chin, W; Cole-Sinclair, M; Mansfield, D; Reid, DW; Snell, GI; Street, A; Williams, TJ, 2003
)
1.24
"Tacrolimus ointment is a safe and effective treatment for atopic dermatitis on the head and neck."( Safe treatment of head/neck AD with tacrolimus ointment.
Hanifin, JM; Kang, S; Paller, A; Rico, MJ; Satoi, Y; Soter, N, 2003
)
2.04
"Tacrolimus is a potent calcineurin inhibitor that was introduced to heart transplantation in the early 1990s. "( Post-operative conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in heart transplantation: a single-center experience.
Cantin, B; Chan, MC; Hunt, SA; Kwok, BW; Shiba, N; Valantine, HA, 2003
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus is an effective immunosuppressive agent for laryngeal transplantation. "( Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil provide effective immunosuppression in rat laryngeal transplantation.
Dan, O; Fritz, M; Nelson, M; Strome, M; Worley, S, 2003
)
3.2
"Tacrolimus ointment is a steroid-free topical immunomodulator developed for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, a common, chronic inflammatory skin disease. "( Potential future dermatological indications for tacrolimus ointment.
Assmann, T; Lebwohl, M; Ruzicka, T,
)
1.83
"Tacrolimus is a macrolactam that prevents the transcription of messenger RNA for various inflammatory cytokines in both helper T cells (types 1 and 2) (T(H)1 and T(H)2). "( Tacrolimus ointment 0.1% in the treatment of nickel-induced allergic contact dermatitis.
Belsito, DV; Gadzia, JE; Saripalli, YV, 2003
)
3.2
"Tacrolimus is a T-cell-selective cytokine inhibitor. "( Efficacy and safety of topically applied tacrolimus ointment in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.
Hong, HS; Tsai, HJ; Wong, WR, 2003
)
2.03
"Tacrolimus ointment 0.1% is a promising corticosteroid alternative for hand/foot eczema."( An open-label pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topically applied tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of hand and/or foot eczema.
Brooke, E; Fleischer, A; Jorizzo, JL; Lang, W; McCarty, MA; Osborne, BE; Thelmo, MC, 2003
)
1.99
"Tacrolimus ointment is a significant advance in dermatology and provides physicians with an alternative to conventional topical corticosteroid therapy."( Atopic dermatitis management with tacrolimus ointment (Protopic).
Allen, BR; Kapp, A; Reitamo, S, 2003
)
1.32
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug that is a substrate of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) enzymes and P-glycoprotein (P-gp). "( Pharmacokinetic interaction between corticosteroids and tacrolimus after renal transplantation.
Anglicheau, D; Beaune, P; Cassinat, B; Flamant, M; Legendre, C; Martinez, F; Schlageter, MH; Thervet, E, 2003
)
2.01
"Tacrolimus is a substrate of cytochrome p450 (CYP), of subfamily CYP3A."( Impact of cytochrome p450 3A5 genetic polymorphism on tacrolimus doses and concentration-to-dose ratio in renal transplant recipients.
Anglicheau, D; Beaune, P; Cassinat, B; Daly, AK; King, B; Legendre, C; Schlageter, MH; Thervet, E, 2003
)
1.29
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent that can show a wide variety of neurologic side effects, including leukoencephalopathy. "( Severe tacrolimus leukoencephalopathy after liver transplantation.
Schuuring, J; Verrips, A; Wesseling, P,
)
2.03
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant approved for the prevention of rejection following transplantation and is a substrate for CYP3A and P-glycoprotein. "( Effects of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.
Akhtar, S; Chen, YL; Hebert, MF; Larson, AM; Park, JM, 2004
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus is an effective organ transplantation immunosuppressant. "( Tacrolimus-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: a case analysis.
Chang, CF; Chao, YW; King, KL; Lin, CC; Yang, AH; Yang, WC,
)
3.02
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive agent used in lung transplantation and is a substrate for both P-glycoprotein (P-gp, encoded by the gene MDR1) and cytochrome (CYP) P4503A. "( Tacrolimus dosing in adult lung transplant patients is related to cytochrome P4503A5 gene polymorphism.
Burckart, GJ; Dauber, J; Grgurich, W; Griffith, BP; Iacono, A; Lamba, J; McCurry, K; McDade, K; Ristich, J; Schuetz, E; Webber, S; Zaldonis, D; Zeevi, A; Zhang, J; Zheng, H, 2004
)
3.21
"Tacrolimus is an immunomodulator now available in a topical ointment."( Topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment for refractory skin disease in dermatomyositis: a pilot study.
Hollar, CB; Jorizzo, JL, 2004
)
1.48
"Tacrolimus is an effective, well-tolerated medication for treatment-resistant forms of nephrotic syndrome in children, with a complete remission rate of 81% and a partial remission rate of 13% (totaling 94%)."( Tacrolimus therapy in pediatric patients with treatment-resistant nephrotic syndrome.
Gowrishankar, M; Loeffler, K; Yiu, V, 2004
)
2.49
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a potent macrolide immunosuppressant used for prevention of organ transplant rejection following transplantation. "( Evaluation of the new EMIT tacrolimus assay in kidney and liver transplant recipients.
Akaydin, M; Akbas, SH; Akcit, F; Demirbas, A; Ersoy, F; Gultekin, M; Gurkan, A; Tuncer, M; Yavuz, A; Yurdakonar, E,
)
1.87
"Tacrolimus is a newer calcineurin inhibitor that has been used in renal transplant recipients as primary or rescue therapy."( Effect of calcineurin inhibitors on extracellular matrix turnover in isolated human glomeruli.
Cornacchia, F; Dal Canton, A; De Mauri, A; Esposito, C; Fasoli, G; Foschi, A; Mazzullo, T; Parrilla, B; Plati, AR; Scudellaro, R, 2004
)
1.04
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor that passes the blood-brain barrier and may increase cerebrovascular tone and restrict cerebral ammonia influx."( Tacrolimus ameliorates cerebral vasodilatation and intracranial hypertension in the rat with portacaval anastomosis and hyperammonemia.
Dethloff, T; Hansen, BA; Larsen, FS, 2004
)
2.49
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a hydrophobic immunosuppressive agent that rapidly penetrates the plasmatic membrane and inhibits the signal transduction cascade of T lymphocytes. "( Characterization of liposomal tacrolimus in lung surfactant-like phospholipids and evaluation of its immunosuppressive activity.
Cañadas, O; Casals, C; García-Cañero, R; Guerrero, R; Menéndez, M; Orellana, G, 2004
)
2.05
"Tacrolimus is an efficient primary immunosuppressive drug in renal transplantation but its long-term use is associated with calcineurin-inhibitor-related toxicity. "( Time-related clinical determinants of long-term tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in combination therapy with mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids: a prospective study in one hundred de novo renal transplant recipients.
Claes, K; Coosemans, W; Evenepoel, P; Kuypers, DR; Maes, B; Pirenne, J; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2004
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus is a safe and effective treatment for the prevention of rejection after liver transplantation in children."( Tacrolimus and steroids versus ciclosporin microemulsion, steroids, and azathioprine in children undergoing liver transplantation: randomised European multicentre trial.
Becker, M; Boillot, O; Burdelski, M; Gridelli, B; Jara, P; Kelly, D; Lykavieris, P; Manzanares, J; Reding, R; Rodeck, B,
)
3.02
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a widely used immunosuppressant for preventing allograft rejection and the treatment of atopic dermatitis. "( On-chip micro-flow polystyrene bead-based immunoassay for quantitative detection of tacrolimus (FK506).
Endo, T; Murakami, Y; Nagatani, N; Takamura, Y; Tamiya, E; Yamamura, S, 2004
)
1.99
"Tacrolimus is a substrate for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 and p-glycoprotein encoded by CYP3A5 and MDR1 (ABCB1), respectively, having multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms."( Influence of CYP3A5 and MDR1 (ABCB1) polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients.
Habuchi, T; Kato, T; Li, Z; Ohyama, C; Sato, K; Satoh, S; Suzuki, T; Tada, H; Tsuchiya, N, 2004
)
1.27
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug used most successfully as a primary drug to suppress the rejection of transplants. "( [Treatment with tacrolimus in autoimmune diseases].
Azanza, JR; Fernández, V; García Quetglas, E; Sádaba, B,
)
1.92
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an immunosuppressive drug, widely used for organ transplantation and atopic dermatitis. "( A review of the action of tacrolimus (FK506) on experimental models of rheumatoid arthritis.
Miyata, S; Mutoh, S; Ohkubo, Y, 2005
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus is a new immunosuppressive agent acting through the selective inhibition of helper-T-cell activation that can be reduced dosage of steroids and can maintain remission of myasthenia gravis with invasive thymoma."( Low-dose tacrolimus for two cases of myasthenia gravis with invasive thymoma that relapsed shortly after thymectomy.
Deguchi, K; Ikeda, K; Kuriyama, S; Sasaki, I; Shimamura, M; Takeuchi, H; Touge, T; Tsukaguchi, M; Urai, Y, 2005
)
1.47
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a hydrophobic immunosuppressive agent used in kidney, liver, and lung transplantation. "( Equilibrium studies of a fluorescent tacrolimus binding to surfactant protein A.
Cañadas, O; Casals, C; Orellana, G; Sáenz, A, 2005
)
2.04
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive drug widely used to prevent and treat graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in stem cell transplantation (SCT). "( Tacrolimus-related encephalopathy following allogeneic stem cell transplantation in children.
Fujisaki, H; Hara, J; Imai, K; Kanekiyo, T; Kubota, K; Matsuda-Hashii, Y; Ozono, K; Sawada, A; Shimono, K; Tokimasa, S, 2005
)
3.21
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a water-insoluble macrolide immunosuppressant discovered in 1984."( Use of a tacrolimus-eluting stent to inhibit neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine coronary model.
Bosmans, J; De Scheerder, I; Huang, Y; Li, S; Liu, X; Lorenz, G; Salu, K; Van de Werf, F; Verbeken, E; Wang, L; Wnendt, S, 2005
)
1.47
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a potent immunosuppressive drug used for prevention of rejection following transplantation. "( Effects of some hematological parameters on whole blood tacrolimus concentration measured by two immunoassay-based analytical methods.
Akaydin, M; Akbas, SH; Caglar, S; Demirbas, A; Ersoy, FF; Gultekin, M; Gurkan, A; Ozdem, S; Senol, Y; Tuncer, M; Yucetin, L, 2005
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus seems to be a more appropriate drug to be used for primary immunosuppression in liver transplantation."( Five-year follow-up of a trial comparing Tacrolimus and cyclosporine microemulsion in liver transplantation.
Abradelo, M; Alvarez-Laso, C; Bilbao, I; Cuervas-Mons, V; González-Pinto, IM; Londoño, MC; Margarit, C; Rimola, A; Sánchez-Turrión, V, 2005
)
1.32
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an immunosuppressant agent that is widely used in transplanted patients. "( The role of endothelin in FK506-induced vascular reactivity changes in rat perfused kidney.
Soydan, G; Tekes, E; Tuncer, M, 2005
)
1.77
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a macrolide antibiotic used to minimize transplant rejections. "( Acute effects of tacrolimus (FK506) on left ventricular mechanics.
da Cunha, D; Hamlin, RL; Nishijima, Y; Ozkanlar, Y, 2005
)
2.11
"Tacrolimus is a potent antiproliferative and immunosuppressive agent allowing for improved endothelial regeneration. "( Comparative study of tacrolimus and paclitaxel stent coating in the porcine coronary model.
Böhm, M; Grandt, A; Lorenz, G; Nickenig, G; Scheller, B; Wnendt, S, 2005
)
2.09
"Tacrolimus is a relatively new calcineurin inhibitor that has been increasingly used in transplant medicine. "( Tacrolimus for induction therapy of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: an open-labeled pilot study.
Au, TC; Mok, CC; Siu, YP; To, CH; Tong, KH, 2005
)
3.21
"Tacrolimus is an effective option for induction treatment of SLE-diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis. "( Tacrolimus for induction therapy of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: an open-labeled pilot study.
Au, TC; Mok, CC; Siu, YP; To, CH; Tong, KH, 2005
)
3.21
"Tacrolimus is a potent agent with a narrow therapeutic window and large inter- and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability."( Pharmacokinetic considerations relating to tacrolimus dosing in the elderly.
Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2005
)
1.31
"Tacrolimus is a well-tolerated and effective therapy for managing refractory ILD and myositis in anti-aaRS-positive patients."( Treatment of antisynthetase-associated interstitial lung disease with tacrolimus.
Fertig, N; Lucas, MR; Oddis, CV; Sereika, SM; Wilkes, MR, 2005
)
2
"Tacrolimus is an approved immunosuppressive agent and a known substrate for CYP3A. "( Concomitant tacrolimus and micafungin pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.
Allison, M; Bekersky, I; Blough, DK; Buell, D; Hebert, MF; Keirns, J; Townsend, RW, 2005
)
2.15
"Tacrolimus is a common component of multi-drug immunosuppressive regimens that are used for the prevention of rejection in transplant recipients. "( Tacrolimus: in vitro effects on myelopoiesis, apoptosis, and CD11b expression.
Koenig, JM; Matharoo, N; Schowengerdt, KO; Stegner, JJ, 2005
)
3.21
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug with a narrow therapeutic range and wide interindividual variation in its pharmacokinetics. "( Influence of CYP3A5 and MDR1 polymorphisms on tacrolimus concentration in the early stage after renal transplantation.
Chen, JS; Chen, ZH; Li, LS; Liu, ZH; Tang, Z; Zhang, X; Zheng, JM, 2005
)
2.03
"Tacrolimus is an immunomodulatory agent that inhibits the activation and maturation of T-cells and blocks transcriptional activation of several cytokine genes. "( Successful treatment of genital and facial psoriasis with tacrolimus ointment 0.1%.
Arvanitis, A; Karpouzis, A; Koumantaki, E; Kouskoukis, C; Nasiopoulou, A; Rallis, E; Roussaki-Schulze, A, 2005
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus is a new inhibitor of calcineurine used as an alternative to cyclosporine A."( Clinical evaluation of marginal parodontium condition in patients after kidney graft treated with calcineurine inhibitors and calcium channel blockers.
Boratynska, M; Radwan-Oczko, M; Zietek, M,
)
0.85
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug that has been used widely in organ transplantation and topically for atopic dermatitis. "( Tacrolimus in rheumatoid arthritis.
Fleischmann, R; Iqbal, I; Stern, RL, 2006
)
3.22
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a potent immunosuppressive agent that inhibit transcription of cytokines such as IL-2 in T cells. "( The immunosuppressive agent FK506 enhances the cytolytic activity of inhibitory natural killer cell receptor (CD94/NKG2A)-expressing CD8 T cells.
Asaka, M; Hirate, D; Imamura, M; Iwao, N; Kato, N; Miura, Y; Ota, S; Shigematsu, A; Tanaka, J; Toubai, T; Tsutsumi, Y, 2005
)
1.77
"Tacrolimus is a strong immunosuppressive drug associated with low acute rejection rates, but a higher risk for PTDM."( Higher initial tacrolimus blood levels and concentration-dose ratios in kidney transplant recipients who develop diabetes mellitus.
Arias, M; Cotorruelo, JG; de Castro, SS; de Cos, MA; de Francisco, AL; Fernández-Fresnedo, G; Gómez-Alamillo, C; Palomar, R; Piñera, C; Rodrigo, E; Ruiz, JC; Sánchez, B, 2005
)
1.4
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide that inhibits T-cell activation. "( A case of Darier's disease successfully treated with topical tacrolimus.
Fimiani, M; Poggiali, S; Risulo, M; Rubegni, P; Sbano, P, 2006
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus is a widely used immunosuppressant in organ transplantation, but it is characterized by a narrow therapeutic index and high interindividual variations of its pharmacokinetics. "( Influence of CYP3A5 gene polymorphisms of donor rather than recipient to tacrolimus individual dose requirement in liver transplantation.
Jiang, G; Jin, J; Wu, L; Xie, H; Yan, S; Yu, S; Zheng, S, 2006
)
2.01
"Tacrolimus is an immunomodulator produced by Streptomyces tsukubaensis, whose topical use has been approved for atopic dermatitis."( [Vitiligo. Treatment of 12 cases with topical tacrolimus].
Almeida, P; Borrego, L; Cameselle, D; Hernández, B; Luján, D; Rodríguez-López, J, 2005
)
1.31
"Tacrolimus is an important drug for immunosuppression after liver transplantation. "( Buccal vs. nasogastric tube administration of tacrolimus after pediatric liver transplantation.
Albers, MJ; Goorhuis, JF; Peeters, PM; Scheenstra, R, 2006
)
2.03
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressant that is widely used in transplant surgery. "( Tacrolimus induced subacute cerebellar ataxia.
Faerber, E; Kaleyias, J; Kothare, SV, 2006
)
3.22
"Tacrolimus monotherapy is a viable immunosuppressive strategy in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients."( Rejection rates in a randomised trial of tacrolimus monotherapy versus triple therapy in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus cirrhosis.
Burroughs, AK; Davidson, BR; Dhillon, AP; Leandro, G; Mela, M; Patch, DW; Pesci, A; Quaglia, A; Raimondo, ML; Rolles, K; Samonakis, DN; Thalheimer, U; Triantos, CK, 2006
)
2.04
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug that has proved effective in the treatment of psoriasis when administered systemically. "( Topical tacrolimus for the treatment of psoriasis on the face, genitalia, intertriginous areas and corporal plaques.
Herrera Acosta, E; Martín Ezquerra, G; Sánchez Regaña, M; Umbert Millet, P, 2006
)
2.21
"Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment is a promising alternative therapy for eyelid eczema in AKC patients. "( Tacrolimus ointment vs steroid ointment for eyelid dermatitis in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis.
Chryssanthou, E; Jung, K; Montan, PG; Nivenius, E; van der Ploeg, I; van Hage, M, 2007
)
3.23
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor that has been widely used to prevent allograft rejection after transplantation. "( Delayed effect of grapefruit juice on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in a living-donor liver transplant recipient.
Fukatsu, S; Fukudo, M; Inui, K; Katsura, T; Masuda, S; Ogura, Y; Oike, F; Takada, Y; Yano, I, 2006
)
2
"Tacrolimus ointment is a safe and effective nonsteroid treatment for AD."( Quality of life in patients with atopic dermatitis: impact of tacrolimus ointment.
Kawashima, M, 2006
)
1.3
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is a calcineurin inhibitor that is used for cardiac allograft rejection. "( Clinical outcome of heart transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus with or without mycophenolate mofetil.
Fuchs, U; Koerfer, R; Minami, K; Szabados, F; Tenderich, G; Zittermann, A,
)
1.82
"Tacrolimus is an antibiotic macrolide with immunosuppressant properties isolated from Streptomyces tsukubaensis."( Antiinflammatory effects of Tacrolimus in a mouse model of pleurisy.
Fröde, TS; Medeiros, YS; Pereira, R, 2006
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus ointment is an effective treatment for atopic dermatitis. "( Tacrolimus: focusing on atopic dermatitis.
Carroll, CL; Fleischer, AB, 2006
)
3.22
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide agent that is now the primary immunosuppressant used in prevention of graft rejection in transplant recipients. "( Tacrolimus-associated eosinophilic gastroenterocolitis in pediatric liver transplant recipients: role of potential food allergies in pathogenesis.
Calenda, KA; Dayal, Y; Grand, RJ; Integlia, MJ; Pleskow, RG; Rohrer, RJ; Saeed, SA, 2006
)
3.22
"Tacrolimus is a widely used immunosuppressive agent. "( Tacrolimus treatment of plasmacytoid dendritic cells inhibits dinucleotide (CpG-)-induced tumour necrosis factor-alpha secretion.
Bofill, M; Borràs, FE; Climent, N; Cos, J; Gallart, T; Gatell, JM; Naranjo-Gómez, M; Oliva, H; Pujol-Borrell, R, 2006
)
3.22
"Tacrolimus serves as a therapeutic option for improving lung injury through inhibition of Fas-mediated inflammation."( FK506 (tacrolimus) improves lung injury through inhibition of Fas-mediated inflammation.
Hirayama, Y; Koshika, T; Masunaga, T, 2006
)
2.23
"(1) Tacrolimus (FK-506) is an immunosuppressant that is being investigated for use in patients with Crohn's disease, mainly in those with refractory illness and fistulizing patterns of the disease. "( Tacrolimus for Crohn's disease.
, 2006
)
2.33
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent and topical tacrolimus is used for the treatment of atopic dermatitis and has been occasionally used to treat skin involvement of some systemic inflammatory diseases. "( [Topical tacrolimus and resistant skin lesions of dermatomyositis].
Bedane, C; Bonnetblanc, JM; Liozon, E; Loustaud-Ratti, V; Peyrot, I; Sparsa, A; Vidal, E, 2006
)
2.19
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor that has been increasingly used in transplant medicine. "( Combined therapy of low-dose tacrolimus and prednisone in nephrotic syndrome with slight mesangial proliferation.
Jia, Y; Miao, L; Sun, J; Xu, Z; Yuan, H, 2006
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus is an immunomodulatory macrolide that reduces the stimulatory capacity toward T cells and is therefore worth investigating as a treatment of CTCL."( Successful treatment of patch type mycosis fungoides with tacrolimus ointment 0.1%.
Economidi, A; Papadakis, P; Rallis, E; Verros, C, 2006
)
1.3
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug with narrow therapeutic range and wide interindividual variations in its pharmacokinetics. "( Tacrolimus dosing in Chinese renal transplant patients is related to MDR1 gene C3435T polymorphisms.
Gui, R; Huang, Z; Li, D; Li, J; Nie, X, 2006
)
3.22
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor recently approved in the US and throughout the EU for the prevention of allograft rejection in heart transplant recipients. "( Tacrolimus: in heart transplant recipients.
Keating, GM; McCormack, PL, 2006
)
3.22
"Tacrolimus is a safe and effective treatment for SR FSGS. "( Management of steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in children using tacrolimus.
Adhikari, M; Asharam, K; Bhimma, R; Connolly, C, 2006
)
2
"Oral tacrolimus therapy seems to be an effective and safe alternative in cases of severe juvenile dermatomyositis, especially in those with an important cutaneous involvement."( [Efficacy of tacrolimus (FK-506) in the treatment of recalcitrant juvenile dermatomyositis: study of 6 cases].
Arnal Guimeral, C; Barceló García, P; Boronat Rom, M; Martín Nalda, A; Modesto Caballero, C, 2006
)
1.22
"Tacrolimus ointment is a topical immunomodulator. "( Tacrolimus ointment in nickel sulphate-induced steroid-resistant allergic contact dermatitis.
Corrocher, R; Di Fede, G; Di Lorenzo, G; Friso, S; Mansueto, P; Martinelli, N; Pacor, ML; Pellitteri, ME; Rini, G,
)
3.02
"Tacrolimus ointment is a topical calcineurin inhibitor for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. "( Long-term safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children.
Dobozy, A; Goldschmidt, WF; Harper, J; Palatsi, R; Remitz, A; Rustin, M; Sharpe, G; Smith, CH; Turjanmaa, K; van der Valk, PG, 2007
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus is an appropriate alternative treatment for chronic AD. "( Staphylococcus colonization in atopic dermatitis treated with fluticasone or tacrolimus with or without antibiotics.
Chiang, BL; Chu, CY; Hung, SH; Lee, CC; Liang, TC; Lin, YT; Wang, LC; Yang, YH, 2007
)
2.01
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressant frequently used after solid-organ transplantation. "( Late-onset tacrolimus-associated cerebellar atrophia in a heart transplant recipient.
Beiras-Fernandez, A; Daebritz, S; Kaczmarek, I; Oberhoffer, M; Reichart, B; Schmauss, D; Schoenberg, SO; Sodian, R, 2007
)
2.17
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an immunosuppressive agent used in clinical transplantation. "( Acute influence of FK506 on T-lymphocyte populations of peripheral blood and spleen in rats.
Li, N; Li, Q; Ma, J; Wang, M; Zhang, Q,
)
1.57
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor, which has been suggested to be helpful in cyclosporine-related chronic toxicity."( A role for HO-1 in renal function impairment in animals subjected to ischemic and reperfusion injury and treated with immunosuppressive drugs.
Bertocchi, AP; Câmara, NO; Cenedeze, MA; Damião, MJ; Dos Reis, MA; Feitoza, CQ; Gonçalves, GM; Pacheco-Silva, A; Teixeira, VP; Wang, PW, 2007
)
1.06
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive agent widely used in renal and liver transplantations. "( Tacrolimus intoxication resolved by gastrointestinal bleeding: case report.
Bur Am Orde, L; Renner, FC; Staak, A; Walmrath, HD; Weimer, R, 2007
)
3.23
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressant used in transplantation. "( A randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover bioavailability study of two oral formulations of tacrolimus in healthy Korean adults.
Kim, KH; Kim, YS; Kwon, KI; Lee, YJ; Park, K; Park, MS, 2007
)
2
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent used in solid organ and islet transplantation. "( Resolution of severe atopic dermatitis after tacrolimus withdrawal.
Alejandro, R; Baidal, DA; Cure, P; Faradji, RN; Froud, T; Pileggi, A; Poggioli, R; Ponte, GM; Ricordi, C; Romanelli, P; Selvaggi, G, 2007
)
2.04
"Tacrolimus is a safe and effective immunosuppressant in live related renal transplantation."( Tacrolimus (Pan Graf) in live related renal transplantation: an initial experience of 101 recipients in India.
Agarwal, SK; Bhowmik, D; Chatterjee, A; Chaudhary, A; Dash, SC; Dinda, A; Guleria, S; Gupta, S; Kamboj, M; Mahajan, S; Sharma, M; Tiwari, SC, 2007
)
3.23
"Tacrolimus is a promising therapy for patients with UC refractory to the combination of high-dose corticosteroids and leukocytapheresis."( Rescue therapy with tacrolimus for a patient with severe ulcerative colitis refractory to combination leukocytapheresis and high-dose corticosteroid therapy.
Chiba, T; Inoue, S; Kasahara, K; Kitamura, H; Matsuura, M; Mikami, S; Nakase, H; Takeda, Y; Ueno, S; Uza, N; Yoshino, T, 2007
)
1.38
"Tacrolimus ointment is a nonsteroid treatment for atopic dermatitis which is both effective and has a minimal side-effect profile. "( "Unknown Risks" of non-steroid topical medications for atopic dermatitis.
Koo, JY; McNeill, AM, 2007
)
1.78
"Tacrolimus is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). "( Tacrolimus-related nocturnal myoclonus of the lower limbs in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Azuma, T; Oishi, M; Sawada, S; Takei, M, 2007
)
3.23
"Tacrolimus is an effective immunosuppressant, safely administered in clinical practice by monitoring blood levels. "( Severe tacrolimus toxicity in rabbits.
Bishop, AT; Friedrich, PF; Gades, NM; Giessler, GA, 2007
)
2.24
"Tacrolimus is an important immunosuppressive drug for organ transplantation patients. "( A novel approach for prediction of tacrolimus blood concentration in liver transplantation patients in the intensive care unit through support vector regression.
Benoit, D; De Turck, F; Decruyenaere, J; Hoste, E; Van Looy, S; Van Maele, G; Verplancke, T, 2007
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus is an ascomycin macrolactam derivative with immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory activity that belongs to the class of calcineurin inhibitors. "( Assigning new roles to topical tacrolimus.
Gregoriou, S; Korfitis, C; Rallis, E; Rigopoulos, D, 2007
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an effective macrolide immunosuppressant widely used to prevent organ rejection following transplantation. "( Preliminary evaluation of the new TACR flex method versus MEIA method in the therapeutic monitoring of tacrolimus in organ transplantation.
Appodia, C; Bachetoni, A; Baiano, V; Berloco, P; Collepardo, D; D'Alessandro, M; Mariani, P,
)
1.79
"Tacrolimus (FK-506) is a medication commonly used in immunosuppressive therapy."( [The influence of tacrolimus on oxidative stress and free-radical processes].
Boratyński, J; Długosz, A; Srednicka, D, 2007
)
1.39
"Tacrolimus ointment is a topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCI) that was developed specifically for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). "( The safety of tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a review.
Rustin, MH, 2007
)
2.14
"Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor that suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokine production and T-cell activation. "( The use of tacrolimus in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.
Chow, DK; Leong, RW, 2007
)
2.17
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug widely used in hepatic transplantation to avoid graft rejection. "( 1199G>A and 2677G>T/A polymorphisms of ABCB1 independently affect tacrolimus concentration in hepatic tissue after liver transplantation.
Capron, A; Elens, L; Haufroid, V; Kerckhove, VV; Lerut, J; Lison, D; Mourad, M; Wallemacq, P, 2007
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug that causes glucose intolerance. "( [Influence of tacrolimus and ciprofloxacin on glucose metabolism].
Arai, S; Gouhara, T; Kihira, K; Kitaura, T; Miyake, K; Morita, S; Nagafuji, T; Sato, E; Tayama, Y, 2007
)
2.14
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide T cell immunomodulator that is used in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients to affect muscle contraction (ryanodine receptor by modulating intracellular calcium-release channels and increasing muscular strength), glucocorticoid receptors (increasing intracellular concentration of steroids and blocking the steroid export mechanism), and an increase in T cell apoptosis. "( Tacrolimus for myasthenia gravis: a clinical study of 212 patients.
Armengol, M; Azem, J; Gamez, J; López-Cano, M; Ponseti, JM; Vilallonga, R, 2008
)
3.23
"Tacrolimus is a new-generation immunosuppressant as successful as cyclosporin in suppressing organ transplant rejection. "( Gingival enlargement among renal transplant recipients in the era of new-generation immunosuppressants.
Armitage, GC; Greenberg, KV; Shiboski, CH, 2008
)
1.79
"Tacrolimus (Tac) is a macrolide immunosuppressant drug isolated from Streptomyces tsukubaensis, widely used in organ transplantation."( Efficacy of tacrolimus in inhibiting inflammation caused by carrageenan in a murine model of air pouch.
de Liz, R; Fröde, TS; Medeiros, YS; Vigil, SV, 2008
)
2.17
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a potent immunosuppressant widely used for organ transplantation patients while diltiazem (DTZ), a calcium-channel inhibitor, is often used in renal transplantation patients to prevent post-transplant hypertension. "( Rapid and simultaneous determination of tacrolimus (FK506) and diltiazem in human whole blood by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: application to a clinical drug-drug interaction study.
Fu, Q; Huang, M; Li, JL; Liu, LS; Wang, CX; Wang, XD; Zhou, SF, 2008
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus (FK 506) is a new potent immunosuppressant. "( Physicochemical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of liposomal tacrolimus (FK 506) in rats.
Jusko, WJ; Lee, MJ; Straubinger, RM, 1995
)
1.96
"Tacrolimus (FK 506) is a macrolide immunosuppressant which possesses similar but more potent immunosuppressant properties compared with cyclosporin, inhibiting cell-mediated and humoral immune responses. "( Tacrolimus. A review of its pharmacology, and therapeutic potential in hepatic and renal transplantation.
Faulds, D; Fitton, A; Peters, DH; Plosker, GL, 1993
)
3.17
"Tacrolimus(FK506) is a strong immuno-suppressant and shows its activity through inhibiting IL-2 mRNA transcription by forming pentameric complex with intracellular receptor(FK506 binding protein 12 kDa or FKBP12), Ca2+, calmodulin, and calcineurin. "( Interaction of tacrolimus(FK506) and its metabolites with FKBP and calcineurin.
Fujimura, T; Fujitsu, T; Iwasaki, K; Kobayashi, M; Kuno, T; Nakamura, K; Sakuma, S; Shimomura, K; Tamura, K; Tanaka, C, 1994
)
2.08
"Tacrolimus is an 822-kDa macrolide antibiotic that has potent immunosuppressive properties. "( Tacrolimus, a new immunosuppressant--a review of the literature.
Hooks, MA, 1994
)
3.17
"Tacrolimus (FK 506) is a new macrolide antibiotic that has an immunosuppressive activity that is estimated to be 10-200 times greater than that of cyclosporine."( Tacrolimus: a potential new treatment for autoimmune chronic active hepatitis: results of an open-label preliminary trial.
Abu-Elmagd, K; Carroll, P; Irish, W; McMichael, J; Rodriguez-Rilo, H; Starzl, TE; Van Thiel, DH; Wright, H, 1995
)
2.46
"Tacrolimus is a relatively new immunosuppressant used in organ transplantation to prevent graft rejection. "( HPLC-microparticle enzyme immunoassay specific for tacrolimus in whole blood of hepatic and renal transplant patients.
Besse, T; Firdaous, I; Hassoun, A; Otte, JB; Reding, R; Squifflet, JP; Wallemacq, PE, 1995
)
1.99
"Tacrolimus is a new macrolide immunosuppressant that was isolated from Streptomyces tsukubaensis in 1984. "( A risk-benefit assessment of tacrolimus in transplantation.
Christians, U; Winkler, M, 1995
)
2.03
"Tacrolimus is an effective alternative to cyclosporine as a primary immunosuppressant in the prevention of organ rejection and may reduce the incidence of rejection after organ transplantation."( Tacrolimus: a new immunosuppressive agent.
Burckart, GJ; Kelly, PA; Venkataramanan, R, 1995
)
2.46
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressive drug undergoing clinical trials for organ transplantation. "( Disposition of tacrolimus (FK 506) in rabbits. Role of red blood cell binding in hepatic clearance.
Chow, FS; Jusko, WJ; Piekoszewski, W,
)
1.93
"Tacrolimus (FK 506) is a new, more powerful immunosuppressant and is more effective in the prevention and treatment of allograft rejection in humans than cyclosporine (CysA). "( Effect of FK 506 on the expression of endothelin receptor mRNA in the vasculature.
Furukawa, K; Inaba, S; Mabuchi, H; Miyamori, I; Takeda, R; Takeda, Y; Wu, P, 1995
)
1.73
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a macrolide lactone which is used as an immunosuppressant agent for organ transplantation. "( Analysis of tacrolimus (FK 506) in relation to therapeutic drug monitoring.
Jusko, WJ, 1995
)
2.11
"Tacrolimus is a useful drug in the treatment of autoimmune enteropathy, even in patients who have not responded to steroids or cyclosporine."( Treatment of pediatric autoimmune enteropathy with tacrolimus (FK506).
Bilodeau, J; Book, L; Bousvaros, A; Leichtner, AM; Mulberg, AE; Ruchelli, E; Semeao, E; Shigeoka, A, 1996
)
1.27
"Tacrolimus is a recently developed immunosuppressive agent, based on a mechanism similar to cyclosporin. "( Experimental and clinical experience with the use of tacrolimus (FK506) in kidney transplantation.
Heemann, U; Herget, S; Wagner, K, 1996
)
1.99
"Tacrolimus is a more potent and satisfactory immunosuppressant than CyA for combination therapy with prednisone. "( The current status of hepatic transplantation at the University of Pittsburgh.
Abu-Elmagd, K; Demetris, J; Fontes, P; Fung, J; Furukawa, H; Mazariegos, G; McMichael, J; Rao, A; Reyes, J; Todo, S, 1995
)
1.73
"Tacrolimus is a superior immunosuppressive agent in patients undergoing renal transplantation. "( The superiority of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients -- the Pittsburgh experience.
Corry, RJ; Egidi, F; Ellis, D; Gilboa, N; Gritsch, HA; Jordan, ML; McCauley, J; Scantlebury, VP; Shapiro, R; Vivas, C, 1995
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus is a potent yet "infant" immunosuppressant for the treatment and prevention of graft rejection and has been shown to exhibit significant clinical activity in some immune-mediated disorders."( Computer-guided randomized concentration-controlled trials of tacrolimus in autoimmunity: multiple sclerosis and primary biliary cirrhosis.
Doyle, H; Irish, W; Lieberman, R; Marino, I; McCauley, J; McMichael, J, 1996
)
1.26
"Tacrolimus (FK 506) is a novel immunosuppressive agent that has been in clinical use for solid organ transplantation since 1989. "( The use of tacrolimus in renal transplantation.
Ellis, D; Gilboa, N; Gritsch, HA; Jordan, ML; Scantlebury, V; Shapiro, R; Starzl, TE; Vivas, CA, 1996
)
2.13
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a new immunosuppressive agent that has recently been given to recipients of liver transplants. "( Tacrolimus (FK506): the pros and cons of its use as an immunosuppressant in pediatric liver transplantation.
Cox, KL; Freese, DK, 1996
)
3.18
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a macrolide antibiotic with potent immunosuppressive properties. "( A simplified whole blood enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ProTrac II) for tacrolimus (FK506) using proteolytic extraction in place of organic solvents.
Ersfeld, D; Jensen, T; Jevans, A; Kobayashi, M; MacFarlane, G; Scheller, D; Wong, PY, 1996
)
1.97
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a potent immunosuppressant that is presently in clinical use for prevention of allograft rejection. "( Tacrolimus (FK506) ameliorates skilled motor deficits produced by middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats.
Butcher, SP; Crawford, JH; Marston, HM; Sharkey, J, 1996
)
3.18
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a macrolide immunosuppressant approved for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in liver transplant. "( Tacrolimus (FK506): validation of a sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit for and application to a clinical pharmacokinetic study.
Alak, A; Bekersky, I; Dressler, DE; Farmen, RH; Lee, JW; Sukovaty, RL, 1997
)
3.18
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent used for organ transplantation. "( Effect of hematocrit and albumin concentration on hepatic clearance of tacrolimus (FK506) during rabbit liver perfusion.
Chow, FS; Jusko, WJ; Piekoszewski, W, 1997
)
1.97
"Tacrolimus is a neutral macrolide antibiotic that is extracted from the fermentation broth of the soil fungus Streptomyces tsukubaensis. "( Tacrolimus (FK 506) overdose: a report of five cases.
Hodgman, M; Krenzelok, EP; Mrvos, R, 1997
)
3.18
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a macrolide lactone effective in the control of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). "( Lack of interaction between tacrolimus (FK506) and methotrexate in bone marrow transplant recipients.
Bekersky, I; Boswell, G; Devine, SM; Fay, JW; Fitzsimmons, W; Klein, JL; Maher, RM; Nash, RA; Przepiorka, D; Ratanatharathorn, V; Wingard, JR, 1997
)
2.03
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an effective immunosuppressant for human heart transplantation, but information about its effects on cardiac allograft and nonallograft kidney and liver histopathologic study is limited."( Adult heart transplantation under tacrolimus (FK506) immunosuppression: histopathologic observations and comparison to a cyclosporine-based regimen with lympholytic (ATG) induction.
Demetris, AJ; Duquesnoy, R; Fung, JJ; Griffith, BP; Kawai, A; Kormos, RL; Pappo, O; Pham, SM; Seaberg, EC; Starzl, TE; Tsamandas, AC; Zeevi, A, 1997
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus is an effective immunosuppressive drug for heart transplantation. "( Adult heart transplantation under tacrolimus (FK506) immunosuppression: histopathologic observations and comparison to a cyclosporine-based regimen with lympholytic (ATG) induction.
Demetris, AJ; Duquesnoy, R; Fung, JJ; Griffith, BP; Kawai, A; Kormos, RL; Pappo, O; Pham, SM; Seaberg, EC; Starzl, TE; Tsamandas, AC; Zeevi, A, 1997
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus (FK 506) is an effective immunosuppressant drug for the prevention of rejection after organ transplantation, and preliminary studies suggest that topical application of tacrolimus is effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis."( A short-term trial of tacrolimus ointment for atopic dermatitis. European Tacrolimus Multicenter Atopic Dermatitis Study Group.
Ahmed, I; Bieber, T; Bos, JD; Daniel, F; Dobozy, A; Finzi, A; Jablonska, S; Reitamo, S; Rubins, A; Ruzicka, T; Schöpf, E; Thestrup-Pedersen, K, 1997
)
2.05
"Tacrolimus (FK 506) is a new, potent immunosuppressive drug for primary and rescue therapy in liver and kidney transplantation. "( Pitfalls in monitoring tacrolimus (FK 506).
Armstrong, VW; Braun, F; Christians, U; Lorf, T; Oellerich, M; Ringe, B; Schiffmann, JH; Schröter, W; Schütz, E; Sewing, KF, 1997
)
2.05
"Tacrolimus (FK 506) is a new macrocyclic lactone immunosuppressant which possesses similar but more potent immunosuppressive properties compared with cyclosporin. "( [Clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic monitoring of tacrolimus].
Garraffo, R,
)
1.82
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an immunosuppressive drug 50-100 times more potent than cyclosporine (CsA), the current mainstay of organ transplant rejection therapy. "( A tacrolimus-related immunosuppressant with biochemical properties distinct from those of tacrolimus.
Cryan, JG; Martin, MM; O'Keefe, SJ; Parsons, JN; Parsons, WH; Peterson, LB; Rosa, R; Sigal, NH; Sinclair, PJ; Wiederrecht, GJ; Williamson, AR; Wilusz, MB; Wong, F; Wyvratt, M, 1998
)
2.46
"Tacrolimus is an effective and safe immunosuppressant for the rescue of heart transplant patients. "( Tacrolimus as a rescue immunosuppressant after heart and lung transplantation. The U.S. Multicenter FK506 Study Group.
Jahania, MS; Lasley, RD; Mentzer, RM, 1998
)
3.19
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressant used in organ transplant recipients; an ointment formulation is being developed as a therapeutic agent for atopic dermatitis."( Tacrolimus (FK506) ointment for atopic dermatitis: a phase I study in adults and children.
Alaiti, S; Bekersky, I; Ellis, CN; Fader, D; Fiedler, VC; Gadgil, SD; Kang, S; Lawrence, I; Raye, K; Scotellaro, P; Spurlin, DV; Tanase, A; Ulyanov, G, 1998
)
3.19
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive drug that decreases mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate production and increases intestinal permeability in animals."( The effect of tacrolimus (FK506) on intestinal barrier function and cellular energy production in humans.
Barclay, GR; Bjarnason, I; Gabe, SM; Johnson, PG; Silk, DB; Tolou-Ghamari, Z; Tredger, JM; Williams, R, 1998
)
1.38
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an effective and relatively safe novel immunosuppressant able to revert refractory rejection after pediatric liver transplantation (LTx). "( Rescue FK506 early conversion for refractory rejection after pediatric liver transplantation: experience in 20 children.
Colledan, M; Fassati, LR; Galmarini, D; Gridelli, B; Lucianetti, A; Reggiani, P; Rossi, G, 1998
)
1.74
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an immunosuppressive agent used for the prevention of allograft rejection after organ transplantation. "( Cholestasis and alterations of glutathione metabolism induced by tacrolimus (FK506) in the rat.
Culebras, JM; Gonzalez, P; Gonzalez-Gallego, J; Lopez-Acebo, R; Sanchez-Campos, S; Tuñon, MJ, 1998
)
1.98
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a macrolide lactone with potent immunosuppressive activity 100 times that of cyclosporine by weight. "( Tacrolimus: a new agent for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Davis, W; Jacobson, P; Ratanatharathorn, V; Uberti, J, 1998
)
3.19
"Tacrolimus is a safe and effective long-term maintenance immunosuppressive agent in primary liver transplantation."( A long-term comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) versus cyclosporine in liver transplantation: a report of the United States FK506 Study Group.
Wiesner, RH, 1998
)
2.04
"Like tacrolimus, L-732,531 is a potent immunosuppressant."( Disposition of L-732,531, a potent immunosuppressant, in rats and baboons.
Carey, KD; Chiu, SH; Colletti, A; Hawkins, T; Karanam, BV; Lavin, M; Miller, RR; Montgomery, T; Stearns, RA; Tang, YS; Vincent, SH, 1998
)
0.76
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive drug successfully used for baseline and rescue immunosuppression in patients after liver and kidney transplantation. "( Multicenter comparison of first- and second-generation IMx tacrolimus microparticle enzyme immunoassays in liver and kidney transplantation.
Brunet, M; Corbella, J; Manzanares, C; Palacios, G; Pou, L, 1998
)
1.99
"Tacrolimus (FK-506) is an important immunosuppressive agent most often given for maintenance immunosuppression to prevent acute cellular organ rejection. "( Interaction between tacrolimus and nefazodone in a stable renal transplant recipient.
Bennett, WM; deMattos, AM; Norman, DJ; Olyaei, AJ,
)
1.9
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an immunosuppressive drug with great clinical promise. "( Tacrolimus metabolite cross-reactivity in different tacrolimus assays.
Davis, DL; Murthy, JN; Soldin, SJ; Yatscoff, RW, 1998
)
3.19
"-Tacrolimus (FK 506) is a powerful, widely used immunosuppressant. "( Mechanisms of FK 506-induced hypertension in the rat.
Furukawa, K; Inaba, S; Mabuchi, H; Miyamori, I; Takeda, Y, 1999
)
1.21
"Tacrolimus is a marketed immunosuppressant used in liver and kidney transplantation. "( Effects of rifampin on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.
Bekersky, I; Dressler, D; Fisher, RM; Hebert, MF; Marsh, CL, 1999
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus is a T cell-specific immunosuppressive agent that has been used in a relatively small number of pediatric kidney transplant recipients. "( Tacrolimus in pediatric renal transplantation: a review.
Shapiro, R, 1998
)
3.19
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide lactone with potent immunosuppressive properties. "( The disposition of 14C-labeled tacrolimus after intravenous and oral administration in healthy human subjects.
Hata, T; Iwasaki, K; Kawamura, A; Möller, A; Schäfer, A; Shiraga, T; Teramura, Y; Undre, NA, 1999
)
2.03
"Tacrolimus is known to be a substrate for P-glycoprotein and metabolized by CYP3A. "( Diltiazem increases tacrolimus concentrations.
Hebert, MF; Lam, AY, 1999
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an effective and well tolerated immunosuppressant used to prevent allograft rejection. "( Tacrolimus ointment improves psoriasis in a microplaque assay.
Erkko, P; Granlund, H; Lauerma, AI; Reitamo, S; Remitz, A, 1999
)
3.19
"Tacrolimus seems to be a more potent immunosuppressant after lung transplantation than CyA; on the other hand, diabetes and nephrotoxicity were diagnosed more frequently using tacrolimus."( Tacrolimus (FK506) as primary immunosuppressant after lung transplantation.
Briegel, J; Fürst, H; Kur, F; Meiser, BM; Müller, C; Reichart, B; Reichenspurner, H; Schwaiblmaier, M; Vogelmeier, C; Welz, A, 1999
)
2.47
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a potent immunosuppressive drug that, when complexed to a family of immunophilin proteins known as FK binding proteins, inhibits calcineurin in T lymphocytes. "( FK506 alters sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release in neonatal piglet cardiac myocytes.
Altschuld, RA; Hohl, CM, 1999
)
1.75
"Tacrolimus is an effective immunosuppressant in the rescue of liver allograft patients in whom conventional immunosuppression failed. "( Tacrolimus rescue in liver transplant patients with refractory rejection or intolerance or malabsorption of cyclosporine. The US Multicenter FK506 Liver Study Group.
Klein, A, 1999
)
3.19
"Tacrolimus is a newer agent with similar immunosuppressant efficacy."( Successful use of cyclosporine in a lung transplant recipient with tacrolimus-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome.
Burton, NA; Myers, JN; Nathan, SD; Shabshab, SF, 1999
)
1.26
"Tacrolimus is a novel immunosuppressive drug that is more potent than CyA, and has been used as a rescue agent following heart transplantation when the use of CyA is undesirable or inefficient."( Conversion of cyclosporine A to tacrolimus following heart transplantation.
Carrier, M; Mathieu, P; Pellerin, M; Pelletier, G; Pelletier, LC; Perrault, LP; White, M, 1999
)
1.31
"Tacrolimus is a very potent drug for preventing all types of acute rejection after renal transplantation. "( Use of tacrolimus in renal transplantation.
Christiaans, MH; van Hooff, JP, 1999
)
2.2
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant drug used for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients who receive allogenic liver or kidney transplants. "( Dose linearity after oral administration of tacrolimus 1-mg capsules at doses of 3, 7, and 10 mg.
Bekersky, I; Dressler, D; Mekki, QA, 1999
)
2.01
"Tacrolimus is an effective alternative immunosuppressive agent for renal transplantation which does not appear to produce gingival enlargement."( Reduction in gingival overgrowth associated with conversion from cyclosporin A to tacrolimus.
Boomer, S; Campbell, BA; Hull, PS; Irwin, CR; James, JA; Johnson, RW; Linden, GJ; Marley, JJ; Maxwell, AP; Short, CD; Spratt, H, 2000
)
1.25
"Tacrolimus (FK-506) is an immunosuppressant agent that acts by a variety of different mechanisms which include inhibition of calcineurin. "( Tacrolimus: a further update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in the management of organ transplantation.
Foster, RH; Plosker, GL, 2000
)
3.19
"Tacrolimus is an important therapeutic option for the optimal individualisation of immunosuppressive therapy in transplant recipients."( Tacrolimus: a further update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in the management of organ transplantation.
Foster, RH; Plosker, GL, 2000
)
3.19
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant used to prevent rejection of transplanted organs. "( Increased tacrolimus levels in a pediatric renal transplant patient attributed to chronic diarrhea.
Boineau, FG; Christensen, ML; Eades, SK, 2000
)
2.15
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is an effective primary immunosuppressive agent in kidney transplantation. "( Clinical and histological analysis of acute tacrolimus (TAC) nephrotoxicity in renal allografts.
Ishikawa, N; Oshima, T; Shimizu, T; Shinmura, H; Tanabe, K; Tokumoto, T; Toma, H; Yamaguchi, Y, 1999
)
2.01
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a safe and effective treatment for the prevention of rejection of renal allografts. "( Safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in cadaveric renal transplant recipients. FK506/MMF Dose-Ranging Kidney Transplant Study Group.
Jensik, SC; Mendez, R; Miller, J; Pirsch, JD, 2000
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent that is gaining widespread use in solid organ transplantation. "( Efficacy of tacrolimus in patients with steroid-resistant cardiac allograft cellular rejection.
Hobbs, RE; Majercik, M; McCarthy, P; Pelegrin, D; Platt, L; Starling, RC; Yamani, MH; Young, JB, 2000
)
2.13
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide compound that, in previous preclinical and clinical studies, was effective in combination with MTX for the prevention of acute GVHD."( Phase 3 study comparing methotrexate and tacrolimus with methotrexate and cyclosporine for prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease after marrow transplantation from unrelated donors.
Anasetti, C; Antin, JH; Avalos, BR; Bartels, P; Buell, D; Davies, S; Fay, JW; Fitzsimmons, W; Karanes, C; Nash, RA; Petersen, FB; Przepiorka, D; Ratanatharathorn, V; Storb, R; Yeager, AM, 2000
)
1.29
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant used to prevent graft rejection in organ transplant patients and has been shown to cause fewer oral side effects than CsA."( Reduction of severe gingival overgrowth in a kidney transplant patient by replacing cyclosporin A with tacrolimus.
Arriba, L; de Andrés, A; Hernández, G; Lucas, M, 2000
)
1.24
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is a useful immunosuppressive agent in the prevention of rejection. "( A peculiar vacuolization in the kidney transplant of a child treated with tacrolimus.
Chikamoto, H; Hattori, M; Horita, S; Ito, K; Matsumoto, N; Oonishi, M; Shiraga, H; Suzuki, T; Tanabe, K; Tokumoto, T; Toma, H; Watanabe, S; Yamaguchi, Y, 2000
)
1.98
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent that interferes with cell-mediated immunity."( Eczema herpeticum during treatment of atopic dermatitis with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment.
Lübbe, J; Pournaras, CC; Saurat, JH, 2000
)
1.27
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant drug with a narrow therapeutic window and thus requires therapeutic drug monitoring. "( Evaluation of microparticle enzyme immunoassay against HPLC-mass spectrometry for the determination of whole-blood tacrolimus in heart- and lung-transplant recipients.
Black, MJ; Pillans, PI; Rutherford, DM; Salm, P; Taylor, PJ, 2000
)
1.96
"Tacrolimus ointment is an effective therapy for the treatment of adult patients with atopic dermatitis on all skin regions including the head and neck."( Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adult patients: part I, efficacy.
Breneman, D; Hanifin, JM; Langley, R; Ling, MR; Rafal, E, 2001
)
2.47
"Tacrolimus ointment is a safe therapy for the treatment of adult patients with atopic dermatitis on the face, neck, or other body regions."( Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adult patients: part II, safety.
Fleischer, AB; Lawrence, I; Monroe, E; Soter, NA; Webster, GF, 2001
)
2.47
"Tacrolimus ointment is a nonsteroidal topical immunomodulator that was formulated specifically for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. "( Long-term safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children.
Hanifin, JM; Kang, S; Lawrence, I; Lucky, AW; Pariser, D, 2001
)
2.03
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a macrolide antibiotic that inhibits T-cell activation and proliferation. "( Tacrolimus monotherapy in adult cardiac transplant recipients: intermediate-term results.
Baran, DA; Cheng, J; Correa, R; Courtney, M; Fallon, JT; Gass, AL; Kushwaha, S; Lansman, SL; Segura, L, 2001
)
3.2
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive agent and has been used in liver transplantation (LTx) for nearly a decade. "( Reasons why some children receiving tacrolimus therapy require steroids more than 5 years post liver transplantation.
Fung, J; Iurlano, K; Jain, A; Kashyap, R; Khanna, A; Marsh, W; Mazariegos, G; Reyes, J, 2001
)
2.03
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive agent used to prevent allograft rejection. "( Comparative clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in paediatric and adult patients.
Verbeeck, RK; Wallemacq, PE, 2001
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive agent that provides higher freedom from acute and chronic rejection than cyclosporine after liver transplantation (LTx). "( Reasons for long-term use of steroid in primary adult liver transplantation under tacrolimus.
Fung, JJ; Jain, A; Kashyap, R; Khanna, A; Marsh, W; Rohal, S, 2001
)
1.98
"Tacrolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressant approved in oral and intravenous formulations for primary immunosuppression in liver and kidney transplantation. "( Significant absorption of topical tacrolimus in 3 patients with Netherton syndrome.
Allen, A; Elias, PM; Korman, NJ; Siegfried, E; Silverman, R; Szabo, SK; Williams, ML, 2001
)
2.03
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a potent macrolide lactone immunosuppressant that is used in the prevention of solid organ rejection."( Amelioration of steroid-resistant chronic graft-versus-host-mediated liver disease via tacrolimus treatment.
Ilan, Y; Menachem, Y; Nagler, A, 2001
)
1.25
"Tacrolimus has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent in liver transplantation (LT). "( Does tacrolimus offer virtual freedom from chronic rejection after primary liver transplantation? Risk and prognostic factors in 1,048 liver transplantations with a mean follow-up of 6 years.
Blakomer, K; Demetris, AJ; Fung, JJ; Jain, A; Kashyap, R; Khan, A; Rohal, S; Ruppert, K; Starzl, TE, 2001
)
2.27
"Tacrolimus is a significant risk factor for PTDM."( Posttransplant diabetes mellitus in pediatric renal transplant recipients: a report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS).
A Cohn, R; Al-Uzri, A; Stablein, DM, 2001
)
1.03
"Tacrolimus (FK506), is a more potent immunosuppressant than CsA and can be prepared in lipid micelles (LTAC)."( Liposomal tacrolimus administered systemically and within the donor cell suspension improves xenograft survival in hemiparkinsonian rats.
Alemdar, AY; Baker, KA; McAlister, VC; Mendez, I; Sadi, D, 2001
)
1.43
"Tacrolimus (FK-506) is a calcium-calcineurin inhibitor, successfully used in transplant recipients. "( Successful treatment of myasthenia gravis with tacrolimus.
Di Schino, C; Evoli, A; Marsili, F; Punzi, C, 2002
)
2.01
"Tacrolimus (TAC/FK506) is a new immunosuppressive agent, recently approved for use in solid-organ transplants."( Oral health in liver transplant children administered cyclosporin A or tacrolimus.
Modéer, T; Németh, A; Wondimu, B, 2001
)
1.27
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a calcineurin inhibitor with potent immunomodulating properties. "( Tacrolimus pharmacology and nonclinical studies: from FK506 to protopic.
Bekersky, I; Lawrence, I; Lilja, H, 2001
)
3.2
"(2) Tacrolimus ointment is a new topical anti-inflammatory agent available in Canada through the Special Access Program."( Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.
Boucher, M, 2001
)
2.23
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant commonly used in the prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) following allogeneic HCT. "( Factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (FK506) in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients.
Brundage, RC; Jacobson, P; Ng, J; Ratanatharathorn, V; Uberti, J, 2001
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus is a prototype of a class of topical immunosuppressive agents with great potential for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. "( Topical FK506 (tacrolimus) therapy for facial erythematous lesions of cutaneous lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis.
Furukawa, F; Ohtani, T; Oshima, A; Sakamoto, T; Yoshimasu, T,
)
1.93
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a new immunosuppressive drug in organ transplantation that has demonstrated experimentally to be more deleterious on bone mineral metabolism than cyclosporine. "( The role of tacrolimus (FK506)-based immunosuppression on bone mineral density and bone turnover after cardiac transplantation: a prospective, longitudinal, randomized, double-blind trial with calcitriol.
Assum, T; Gärtner, R; Meiser, B; Rambeck, WA; Siebert, U; Stempfle, HU; Theisen, K; Wehr, U; Werner, C, 2002
)
2.14
"Tacrolimus (FK 506) is a macrolide discovered in 1984 as a metabolic product of Streptomyces tsukabaensis. "( Tacrolimus enhances irritation in a 5-day human irritancy in vivo model.
Elsner, P; Fuchs, M; Heinemann, C; Schliemann-Willers, S, 2002
)
3.2

Effects

Tacrolimus (Tac) has a more potent immunosuppressive effect and may be less toxic at therapeutic doses than ciclosporin (CsA) It has a narrow therapeutic window, and bioavailability is known to vary considerably between renal transplant recipients.

Tacrolimus (FK506) has been identified as an MRP1 regulator in differentiated glioblastoma (GBM) cells (non-GSCs) The effect of FK506 on GSCs is currently unknown. TacrolimUS with PVA has shown lower cytotoxicity than cyclosporine at early times.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window, and lack of adherence to the therapeutic regimen is a main risk factor for acute graft rejection; hence, the prolonged-release formulation was created. "( Tacrolimus Trough Intravariability in Patients Treated With the Prolonged-Release Formulation Is a Risk Factor for Acute Graft Rejection.
Alves, R; Figueiredo, A; Figueiredo, C; Galvão, A; Mira, FS; Rodrigues, L; Romãozinho, C, 2021
)
3.51
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index and large individual differences in pharmacokinetics. "( Distribution evaluation of tacrolimus in the ascitic fluid of liver transplant recipients with liver cirrhosis by a sensitive ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method.
Du, Y; Ge, J; Ge, W; He, J; Sun, R; Wang, M; Yang, N; Zhu, H, 2022
)
2.46
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic margin. "( Lower Time in Therapeutic Range Relates to a Worse Kidney Graft Outcome.
Barreda, P; Belmar, L; Boya, M; Cañamero, L; De Cos, MA; García-Saiz, MDM; Kislikova, M; Rodrigo, E; Ruiz, JC; Valero, R, 2022
)
2.16
"Tacrolimus has a high initial response in biologic naïve UC children. "( Oral Tacrolimus in Steroid Refractory and Dependent Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bolia, R; Goel, A; Semwal, P; Srivastava, A, 2023
)
2.87
"Tacrolimus variability has a weak association with subtherapeutic levels, but represents a more complicated constellation of clinical factors."( The Epidemiologic Burden of Tacrolimus Variability among Kidney Transplant Recipients in the United States.
Cunningham, PN; Ennis, JL; Josephson, MA; McGill, RL; Shah, PB, 2019
)
1.53
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window, resulting in a tightly defined range of optimal drug exposure."( Long-Term Kidney Transplant Outcomes: Role of Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus.
Banas, B; Kamar, N; Krämer, BK; Krüger, B; Undre, N,
)
1.09
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window. "( A limited sampling strategy to estimate exposure of once-daily modified release tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients using linear regression analysis and comparison with Bayesian population pharmacokinetics in different cohorts.
Christiaans, MHL; Neef, C; Stifft, F; van Kuijk, S; Vandermeer, F, 2020
)
2.23
"As tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window, the impact of circadian patterns on LCPT drug exposure, including food and chronopharmacokinetic effects, needs to be elucidated to optimize dosing."( Chronopharmacokinetics and Food Effects of Single-Dose LCP-Tacrolimus in Healthy Volunteers.
Alloway, RR; Brennan, DC; Cohen, EA; Kerr, J; Meier-Kriesche, U; Momper, JD; Moten, MA; Stevens, DR; Trofe-Clark, J, 2020
)
1.32
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window with overexposure leading to acute and chronic forms of nephrotoxicity."( Effect of diarrhoea on Tacrolimus trough level in a post liver transplant patient.
Tan, ST; Yoong, BK, 2020
)
1.59
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index with high intra- and intersubject variability, in part because of genetic variation."( Precision Dosing for Tacrolimus Using Genotypes and Clinical Factors in Kidney Transplant Recipients of European Ancestry.
Al-Kofahi, M; Dorr, CR; Guan, W; Israni, AK; Jacobson, PA; Mannon, RB; Matas, AJ; Oetting, WS; Remmel, RP; Schladt, DP; Wu, B, 2021
)
1.66
"Tacrolimus has a low therapeutic index requiring strict control of whole blood concentrations. "( A 24-Hour Extended Calibration Strategy for Quantitating Tacrolimus Concentrations by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.
Brister-Smith, A; Saitman, A; Young, JA, 2021
)
2.31
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic drug window but high inter- and intrapatient variability. "( The role of single nucleotide polymorphisms of CYP3A and ABCB1 on tacrolimus predose concentration in kidney transplant recipients.
Arnol, M; Buturović-Ponikvar, J; Dolžan, V; Goričar, K; Mlinšek, G,
)
1.81
"Tacrolimus (Tac) has a narrow therapeutic window and shows large between-patient pharmacokinetic variability. "( The combination of CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3 single-nucleotide polymorphisms determines tacrolimus dose requirement after kidney transplantation.
Andreu, F; Bestard, O; Colom, H; Cruzado, JM; Elens, L; Gil-Vernet, S; Grinyó, JM; Hesselink, DA; Llaudó, I; Lloberas, N; Padullés, A; Torras, J; van Gelder, T; van Schaik, R, 2017
)
2.12
"Tacrolimus has a good safety profile for long-term use in patients with BRC as a second-line agent enabling steroid sparing and visual function stabilisation or improvement."( Safety profile and efficacy of tacrolimus in the treatment of birdshot retinochoroiditis: a retrospective case series review.
Holder, G; Islam, F; Kapoor, B; Pavesio, C; Rees, A; Robson, AG; Westcott, M, 2018
)
2.21
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has a superior immunosuppressive effect compared with cyclosporine (CSA) without a significant increase in generalized infectious complications. "( Calcineurin inhibitors and Clostridium difficile infection in adult lung transplant recipients: the effect of cyclosporine versus tacrolimus.
D'Cunha, J; Dunitz, JM; Hertz, MI; Kelly, RF; Lee, JT; Shumway, SJ; Whitson, BA, 2013
)
2.04
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index and shows large interindividual variations in pharmacokinetics, which may be partly explained by genetic variability in metabolic enzymes of the cytochrome P450 (mainly CYP3A4 and CYP3A5) and transport P-glycoprotein (encoded by the ABCB1 gene). "( Severe acute nephrotoxicity in a kidney transplant patient despite low tacrolimus levels: a possible interaction between donor and recipient genetic polymorphisms.
Boldorini, R; Genazzani, AA; Quaglia, M; Stratta, P; Terrazzino, S, 2013
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus not only has a narrow therapeutic index, but also shows significant interindividual differences."( Effect of MDR1 polymorphisms on the blood concentrations of tacrolimus in Turkish renal transplant patients.
Aydin, AE; Ayna, TK; Bakkaloglu, H; Caliskan, YK; Ciftci, HS; Guney, I; Gurtekin, M; Nane, I; Turkmen, A, 2013
)
1.35
"Tacrolimus has a large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, and quantification of its effect is difficult. "( Genetic polymorphisms in ABCB1 influence the pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus.
Baan, CC; Bouamar, R; Hesselink, DA; Kraaijeveld, R; Vafadari, R; van Gelder, T; van Schaik, RH; Weimar, W, 2013
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus (TAC) has a narrow therapeutic index and high interindividual and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability, necessitating therapeutic drug monitoring to individualize dosage. "( Validation of an LC-MS/MS method to measure tacrolimus in rat kidney and liver tissue and its application to human kidney biopsies.
Coller, JK; Hesselink, DA; Morris, RG; Noll, BD; Russ, GR; Sallustio, BC; Somogyi, AA; Van Gelder, T, 2013
)
2.09
"As tacrolimus has a rather narrow therapeutic range and high individual variability in its pharmacokinetics, it is important to determine the cause of the variation in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. "( Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacogenetic model of tacrolimus in the early period after kidney transplantation.
Ha, J; Ha, S; Han, N; Kim, IW; Kim, MG; Lee, JI; Min, SI; Oh, JM; Yun, HY, 2014
)
1.27
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index."( Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Solid-Organ Transplant Patients.
Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2015
)
1.41
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window and considerable variability in clinical use. "( Application of Machine-Learning Models to Predict Tacrolimus Stable Dose in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Feng, GW; Hu, YF; Liu, MZ; Liu, R; Meng, XG; Ming, YZ; Shang, WJ; Shao, MJ; Tang, J; Xin, HW; Zhang, LR; Zhang, W; Zhang, YL; Zhu, LJ, 2017
)
2.15
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index; therefore, it is essential that the physicochemical properties of generic formulations be identical to the brand-name formulation, Prograf."( Physiochemical properties of generic formulations of tacrolimus in Mexico.
First, MR; Iwabe, O; Kitamura, S; Mimura, H; Ohara, T; Petan, JA; Saito, K; Suzuki, M; Undre, N, 2008
)
1.32
"Tacrolimus has a low potential for systemic accumulation, and analysis of long-term studies indicates that it has a good safety profile."( The safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis.
Eichenfield, LF; McCollum, AD; Paik, A,
)
1.15
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window and shows significant interindividual difference in dose requirement. "( Using genetic and clinical factors to predict tacrolimus dose in renal transplant recipients.
Elliott, E; Gaber, AO; Mao, Y; Patel, S; Razo, J; Shea, E; Wang, P; Wong, ST; Wu, AH; Zhou, X, 2010
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus has a wide spectrum of adverse effects, including neurotoxic and vascular events. "( Effect of tacrolimus on energy metabolism in human umbilical endothelial cells.
Bednarczyk, J; Brockmann, M; Das, A; Göken, C; Hoy, L; Illsinger, S; Janzen, N; Lücke, T; Schmidt, KH; Thiemann, I,
)
1.98
"Tacrolimus has a dose-dependent effect on tumor progression and TGF-beta(1) expression, and tacrolimus-induced TGF-beta(1) overexpression may be a pathogenetic mechanism in tumor progression."( Tacrolimus enhances transforming growth factor-beta1 expression and promotes tumor progression.
Lagman, M; Li, B; Maluccio, M; Sharma, V; Suthanthiran, M; Vyas, S; Yang, H, 2003
)
3.2
"Tacrolimus has a similar (but not identical) mechanism of action, and was introduced in the 1990s."( Calcineurin inhibitor-associated early renal insufficiency in cardiac transplant recipients: risk factors and strategies for prevention and treatment.
Baran, DA; Galin, ID; Gass, AL, 2004
)
1.04
"Tacrolimus (Tac) has a more potent immunosuppressive effect and may be less toxic at therapeutic doses than ciclosporin (CsA)."( Treatment of focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis in adults with tacrolimus monotherapy.
Cairns, TD; Dhaygude, A; Duncan, N; Griffith, M; McLean, AG; Owen, J; Palmer, A; Taube, D, 2004
)
1.28
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window, and bioavailability is known to vary considerably between renal transplant recipients. "( AUC-guided dosing of tacrolimus prevents progressive systemic overexposure in renal transplant recipients.
Cremers, SC; de Fijter, JW; den Hartigh, J; Paul, LC; Rowshani, AT; Schoemaker, RC; Scholten, EM; van Kan, EJ, 2005
)
2.09
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window and a wide interindividual variation in its pharmacokinetics. "( Influence of different allelic variants of the CYP3A and ABCB1 genes on the tacrolimus pharmacokinetic profile of Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Bekers, O; Chan, HW; Chau, KF; Cheung, CY; de Vrie, JE; Kwan, TH; Leung, KT; Li, CS; Op den Buijsch, RA; van Dieijen-Visser, MP; Wijnen, PA; Wong, KM, 2006
)
2.01
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has a neuroprotective action on cerebral infarction produced by cerebral ischemia, however, detailed mechanisms underlying this action have not been fully elucidated. "( Tacrolimus (FK506) attenuates biphasic cytochrome c release and Bad phosphorylation following transient cerebral ischemia in mice.
Furuichi, Y; Li, JY; Matsuoka, N; Mutoh, S; Yanagihara, T, 2006
)
3.22
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window and is characterized by a large inter-individual variability in bioavailability. "( Tacrolimus exposure and evolution of renal allograft histology in the first year after transplantation.
Damme, BV; Kuypers, DR; Lerut, E; Naesens, M; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2007
)
3.23
"Tacrolimus has a negative effect on the pancreatic beta islet cell, and both glucose intolerance and diabetes mellitus are well-recognized complications of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression among adult solid organ transplant recipients."( New-onset diabetes mellitus in pediatric thoracic organ recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.
Boyle, GJ; Cipriani, L; Fricker, FJ; Griffith, BP; Kurland, G; Miller, SA; Wagner, K; Webber, SA, 1997
)
1.97
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has a mechanism of action similar to cyclosporine. "( Preliminary report on the use of oral tacrolimus (FK506) in the treatment of complicated proximal small bowel and fistulizing Crohn's disease.
Sandborn, WJ, 1997
)
2.01
"Tacrolimus also has a use as rescue therapy in bone marrow, heart, lung and pancreatic transplantation, but data are currently insufficient for conclusions to be made."( Tacrolimus. An update of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of organ transplantation.
Gillis, JC; Goa, KL; Spencer, CM, 1997
)
2.46
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has a useful role as an immunosuppressive agent for the treatment of sight-threatening uveitis in patients who did not respond to cyclosporine either because of lack of therapeutic effect or unacceptable adverse effects."( Tacrolimus (FK506) in the treatment of posterior uveitis refractory to cyclosporine.
Dua, HS; Powell, RJ; Sloper, CM, 1999
)
3.19
"Tacrolimus has a 10- to 100-fold greater in vitro immunosuppressive activity compared with cyclosporine."( New developments in the immunosuppressive drug monitoring of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and azathioprine.
Armstrong, VW; Oellerich, M, 2001
)
1.26
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window, and lack of adherence to the therapeutic regimen is a main risk factor for acute graft rejection; hence, the prolonged-release formulation was created. "( Tacrolimus Trough Intravariability in Patients Treated With the Prolonged-Release Formulation Is a Risk Factor for Acute Graft Rejection.
Alves, R; Figueiredo, A; Figueiredo, C; Galvão, A; Mira, FS; Rodrigues, L; Romãozinho, C, 2021
)
3.51
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index and large individual differences in pharmacokinetics. "( Distribution evaluation of tacrolimus in the ascitic fluid of liver transplant recipients with liver cirrhosis by a sensitive ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method.
Du, Y; Ge, J; Ge, W; He, J; Sun, R; Wang, M; Yang, N; Zhu, H, 2022
)
2.46
"Tacrolimus has been widely used in membranous nephropathy in recent years. "( Investigation of pharmacologic interactions between omeprazole and tacrolimus in a membranous nephropathy patient with CYP3A5 nonexpresser: a case report.
Li, Y; Liu, Y; Sun, Z, 2022
)
2.4
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic margin. "( Lower Time in Therapeutic Range Relates to a Worse Kidney Graft Outcome.
Barreda, P; Belmar, L; Boya, M; Cañamero, L; De Cos, MA; García-Saiz, MDM; Kislikova, M; Rodrigo, E; Ruiz, JC; Valero, R, 2022
)
2.16
"Tacrolimus (TAC) has been widely used as an immunosuppressant after kidney transplantation (KT); however, the combined effects of intra-patient variability (IPV) and inter-patient variability of TAC-trough level (C0) in blood remain controversial. "( Combined impact of the inter and intra-patient variability of tacrolimus blood level on allograft outcomes in kidney transplantation.
Chung, BH; Eum, SH; Hwang, WM; Ko, EJ; Lee, H; Min, JW; Park, Y; Shin, J; Yang, CW; Yoon, SH; Yun, SR, 2022
)
2.4
"Tacrolimus has become the first-line immunosuppressant for preventing rejection after heart transplantation. "( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis for Model-Based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus in Chinese Han Heart Transplant Patients.
Chen, J; Cheng, Y; Lin, X; Qiu, H; Zhang, J, 2023
)
2.58
"Tacrolimus has recently been applied to the treatment of autoimmune diseases."( Tacrolimus prevents complement-mediated Nod-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation and pyroptosis of mesenchymal stem cells from immune thrombocytopenia.
An, ZY; Cai, X; Fu, HX; He, Y; Huang, XJ; Wang, CC; Wu, J; Zhang, XH; Zhu, XL, 2023
)
3.07
"Tacrolimus (TAC) has several problems due to its narrow therapeutic window and variations pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. "( A Low Tacrolimus Concentration-to-Dose Ratio Increases Calcineurin Inhibitor Nephrotoxicity and Cytomegalovirus Infection Risks in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Study in Japan.
Fujimoto, K; Hori, S; Inoue, K; Miyake, M; Nakai, Y; Nishimura, N; Tomizawa, M; Yoneda, T,
)
2.05
"Tacrolimus has a high initial response in biologic naïve UC children. "( Oral Tacrolimus in Steroid Refractory and Dependent Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bolia, R; Goel, A; Semwal, P; Srivastava, A, 2023
)
2.87
"Tacrolimus (TAC) has been increasingly used in patients with non-transplant settings. "( Population pharmacokinetic analyses of tacrolimus in non-transplant patients: a systematic review.
Wang, CB; Zhang, YJ; Zhao, LM; Zhao, MM, 2023
)
2.62
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has been reported to have an adjuvant treatment effect against PV."( Tacrolimus reverses pemphigus vulgaris serum-induced depletion of desmoglein in HaCaT cells via inhibition of heat shock protein 27 phosphorylation.
Dai, X; Li, Q; Lin, S; Xie, Z; Ye, X, 2023
)
3.07
"Tacrolimus variability has a weak association with subtherapeutic levels, but represents a more complicated constellation of clinical factors."( The Epidemiologic Burden of Tacrolimus Variability among Kidney Transplant Recipients in the United States.
Cunningham, PN; Ennis, JL; Josephson, MA; McGill, RL; Shah, PB, 2019
)
1.53
"Tacrolimus has significantly improved outcomes for kidney transplant patients and remains the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy. "( Long-Term Kidney Transplant Outcomes: Role of Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus.
Banas, B; Kamar, N; Krämer, BK; Krüger, B; Undre, N,
)
1.81
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window. "( A limited sampling strategy to estimate exposure of once-daily modified release tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients using linear regression analysis and comparison with Bayesian population pharmacokinetics in different cohorts.
Christiaans, MHL; Neef, C; Stifft, F; van Kuijk, S; Vandermeer, F, 2020
)
2.23
"Tacrolimus has 10-fold greater immunosuppressive activity than the ciclosporin A which has been recommended for effective treatment of psoriasis."( Topical delivery of Tacrolimus using liposome containing gel: An emerging and synergistic approach in management of psoriasis.
Awasthi, R; Jindal, S; Kulkarni, GT; Singhare, D, 2020
)
1.6
"As tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window, the impact of circadian patterns on LCPT drug exposure, including food and chronopharmacokinetic effects, needs to be elucidated to optimize dosing."( Chronopharmacokinetics and Food Effects of Single-Dose LCP-Tacrolimus in Healthy Volunteers.
Alloway, RR; Brennan, DC; Cohen, EA; Kerr, J; Meier-Kriesche, U; Momper, JD; Moten, MA; Stevens, DR; Trofe-Clark, J, 2020
)
1.32
"Tacrolimus has been used as an immunosuppressive agent in organ transplantation. "( Human kidney organoids model the tacrolimus nephrotoxicity and elucidate the role of autophagy.
Ju, JH; Kim, D; Kim, DS; Kim, HL; Kim, HW; Kim, J; Kim, JW; Kim, YK; Lee, JY; Lim, SW; Nam, SA; Seo, E; Yang, CW, 2021
)
2.35
"High tacrolimus IPV has been associated with poor outcomes including acute rejection, dnDSA formation, graft loss, and patient mortality in SOT recipients. "( Tacrolimus intrapatient variability in solid organ transplantation: A multiorgan perspective.
Leino, AD; Park, JM; Schumacher, L, 2021
)
2.58
"Tacrolimus has been widely used in recent years for treating allergic conjunctivitis, but there is currently no available meta-analysis regarding its therapeutic efficacy. "( Therapeutic efficacy of tacrolimus in vernal keratoconjunctivitis: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
He, F; Lin, W; Meng, Q; Qiu, W; Yang, Y; Zhang, J; Zhao, M; Zhou, Z, 2022
)
2.47
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window with overexposure leading to acute and chronic forms of nephrotoxicity."( Effect of diarrhoea on Tacrolimus trough level in a post liver transplant patient.
Tan, ST; Yoong, BK, 2020
)
1.59
"Tacrolimus has been used to treat various inflammatory skin diseases, but its safety for topical application on the oral mucosa is unknown. "( Tacrolimus 0.03% ointment treatment in exfoliative cheilitis: A randomised controlled clinical trial and monitoring blood concentration.
He, J; Hu, M; Lin, M; Liu, J; Shi, L; Wang, H; Wang, X; Wu, F; Zhou, H, 2021
)
3.51
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index with high intra- and intersubject variability, in part because of genetic variation."( Precision Dosing for Tacrolimus Using Genotypes and Clinical Factors in Kidney Transplant Recipients of European Ancestry.
Al-Kofahi, M; Dorr, CR; Guan, W; Israni, AK; Jacobson, PA; Mannon, RB; Matas, AJ; Oetting, WS; Remmel, RP; Schladt, DP; Wu, B, 2021
)
1.66
"Tacrolimus has shown efficacy in eye inflammatory diseases. "( Topical tacrolimus nanocapsules eye drops for therapeutic effect enhancement in both anterior and posterior ocular inflammation models.
Badihi, A; Benita, S; Nassar, T; Rebibo, L; Shoshani, E; Sun, Y; Tam, C, 2021
)
2.5
"Tacrolimus has been proposed as a treatment for severe forms of VKC. "( Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Tacrolimus 0.1% in Severe Pediatric Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis.
Bacci, GM; Caputo, R; Danti, G; de Libero, C; Di Grande, L; Lucenteforte, E; Marziali, E; Mori, F; Pucci, N; Villani, E; Virgili, G, 2021
)
2.35
"Tacrolimus has a low therapeutic index requiring strict control of whole blood concentrations. "( A 24-Hour Extended Calibration Strategy for Quantitating Tacrolimus Concentrations by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.
Brister-Smith, A; Saitman, A; Young, JA, 2021
)
2.31
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic drug window but high inter- and intrapatient variability. "( The role of single nucleotide polymorphisms of CYP3A and ABCB1 on tacrolimus predose concentration in kidney transplant recipients.
Arnol, M; Buturović-Ponikvar, J; Dolžan, V; Goričar, K; Mlinšek, G,
)
1.81
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has been demonstrated to reduce epidural fibrosis. "( Tacrolimus induces fibroblasts apoptosis and reduces epidural fibrosis by regulating miR-429 and its target of RhoE.
Chen, H; Dai, J; Li, X; Sun, Y; Wang, J; Wang, S; Yan, L, 2017
)
3.34
"Tacrolimus (Tac) has a narrow therapeutic window and shows large between-patient pharmacokinetic variability. "( The combination of CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3 single-nucleotide polymorphisms determines tacrolimus dose requirement after kidney transplantation.
Andreu, F; Bestard, O; Colom, H; Cruzado, JM; Elens, L; Gil-Vernet, S; Grinyó, JM; Hesselink, DA; Llaudó, I; Lloberas, N; Padullés, A; Torras, J; van Gelder, T; van Schaik, R, 2017
)
2.12
"Tacrolimus has been used to treat refractory uveitis through systemic administration."( A Low Concentration of Tacrolimus/Semifluorinated Alkane (SFA) Eyedrop Suppresses Intraocular Inflammation in Experimental Models of Uveitis.
De Majumdar, S; Korward, J; Pettigrew, A; Scherer, D; Subinya, M; Xu, H, 2017
)
1.49
"Tacrolimus (TAC) has been indicated as a treatment for RA in patients who failed to respond to methotrexate."( Successful treatment with clarithromycin and/or tacrolimus for two patients with polymyalgia rheumatica.
Horita, T; Ohe, M; Oku, K; Shida, H,
)
1.11
"Tacrolimus repurposing has therefore therapeutic potential in HHT."( Tacrolimus rescues the signaling and gene expression signature of endothelial ALK1 loss-of-function and improves HHT vascular pathology.
Blanc, L; Campagne, F; Chandakkar, P; Chatterjee, PK; Christen, E; Marambaud, P; Metz, CN; Papoin, J; Ruiz, S; Zhao, H, 2017
)
2.62
"Tacrolimus has a good safety profile for long-term use in patients with BRC as a second-line agent enabling steroid sparing and visual function stabilisation or improvement."( Safety profile and efficacy of tacrolimus in the treatment of birdshot retinochoroiditis: a retrospective case series review.
Holder, G; Islam, F; Kapoor, B; Pavesio, C; Rees, A; Robson, AG; Westcott, M, 2018
)
2.21
"Tacrolimus with PVA has shown lower cytotoxicity than cyclosporine at early times."( Preclinical characterization and clinical evaluation of tacrolimus eye drops.
Aguiar, P; Alonso-Rodríguez, I; Fernández-Ferreiro, A; García-Otero, X; Gómez-Lado, N; González-Barcia, M; Herranz, M; Lamas, MJ; Luaces-Rodríguez, A; Martínez-Pérez, L; Otero-Espinar, FJ; Rodríguez-Ares, MT; Ruibal-Morell, Á; Silva-Rodríguez, J; Touriño-Peralba, R, 2018
)
1.45
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has been identified as an MRP1 regulator in differentiated glioblastoma (GBM) cells (non-GSCs); however, the effect of FK506 on GSCs is currently unknown."( FK506 Attenuates the MRP1-Mediated Chemoresistant Phenotype in Glioblastoma Stem-Like Cells.
Arriagada, V; Carrasco, C; Erices, JI; Niechi, I; Oyarzún, C; Quezada, C; Rocha, JD; Toro, MLÁ; Torres, Á, 2018
)
1.2
"Tacrolimus has been associated with notable extrarenal adverse effects (AEs), which are unpredictable and impact patient morbidity. "( The impact of tacrolimus exposure on extrarenal adverse effects in adult renal transplant recipients.
Brazeau, D; Campagne, O; Mager, DE; Tornatore, KM; Venuto, RC, 2019
)
2.32
"Tacrolimus has been widely used as a powerful novel immunosuppressant. "( Enhancing the production of tacrolimus by engineering target genes identified in important primary and secondary metabolic pathways and feeding exogenous precursors.
Li, Y; Liang, S; Ma, D; Wang, J; Wen, J, 2019
)
2.25
"Tacrolimus has been widely applied to prevent organ rejection after transplantation. "( Development and effects of tacrolimus-loaded nanoparticles on the inhibition of corneal allograft rejection.
Chen, W; DongYe, M; Lin, D; Lin, H; Liu, D; Wang, D; Wu, Q; Zhang, X; Zhu, F, 2019
)
2.25
"Tacrolimus has been demonstrated to have remarkable therapeutic efficacy in UC patients, without increased risk of severe adverse effects such as induction of remission and maintenance therapy."( Tacrolimus Therapy in Steroid-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis: A Review.
Ran, Z; Tong, J; Wu, B, 2020
)
2.72
"Tacrolimus has same mechanism of action."( Intravesical tacrolimus in treatment of intractable interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome - A pilot study.
Mishra, NN; Pathak, N; Riedl, C; Shah, S, 2019
)
1.6
"Tacrolimus has been widely used for immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation (SOT) and allo-geneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) over the past 2 decades. "( A case report: acute pancreatitis associated with tacrolimus in kidney transplantation.
Cai, M; Li, X; Wei, X; Xu, J; Xu, L, 2019
)
2.21
"Tacrolimus has been widely accepted as the backbone of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). "( Tacrolimus Levels in the Prophylaxis of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in the Chinese Early After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
Li, S; Liao, YX; Liu, XO; Miao, WJ; Tian, JX; Wang, XD; Yan, HH; Zhang, P, 2019
)
3.4
"Tacrolimus has been used for vernal/atopic conjunctivitis."( Topical tacrolimus for the management of acute allergic conjunctivitis in a mouse model.
Barequet, IS; Etkin, S; Habot-Wilner, Z; Platner, E; Rosner, M; Sade, K; Ziv, H, 2013
)
1.55
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has a superior immunosuppressive effect compared with cyclosporine (CSA) without a significant increase in generalized infectious complications. "( Calcineurin inhibitors and Clostridium difficile infection in adult lung transplant recipients: the effect of cyclosporine versus tacrolimus.
D'Cunha, J; Dunitz, JM; Hertz, MI; Kelly, RF; Lee, JT; Shumway, SJ; Whitson, BA, 2013
)
2.04
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index and shows large interindividual variations in pharmacokinetics, which may be partly explained by genetic variability in metabolic enzymes of the cytochrome P450 (mainly CYP3A4 and CYP3A5) and transport P-glycoprotein (encoded by the ABCB1 gene). "( Severe acute nephrotoxicity in a kidney transplant patient despite low tacrolimus levels: a possible interaction between donor and recipient genetic polymorphisms.
Boldorini, R; Genazzani, AA; Quaglia, M; Stratta, P; Terrazzino, S, 2013
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus not only has a narrow therapeutic index, but also shows significant interindividual differences."( Effect of MDR1 polymorphisms on the blood concentrations of tacrolimus in Turkish renal transplant patients.
Aydin, AE; Ayna, TK; Bakkaloglu, H; Caliskan, YK; Ciftci, HS; Guney, I; Gurtekin, M; Nane, I; Turkmen, A, 2013
)
1.35
"Tacrolimus has been used for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) therapy, but most patients who achieved remission showed a high relapse rate when tacrolimus was withdrawn after 6-12 months of therapy. "( Effect of prolonged tacrolimus treatment in idiopathic membranous nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome.
Jia, Y; Liu, N; Luo, P; Miao, LN; Sun, GD; Yuan, H, 2013
)
2.16
"Tacrolimus has a large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, and quantification of its effect is difficult. "( Genetic polymorphisms in ABCB1 influence the pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus.
Baan, CC; Bouamar, R; Hesselink, DA; Kraaijeveld, R; Vafadari, R; van Gelder, T; van Schaik, RH; Weimar, W, 2013
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus (TAC) has a narrow therapeutic index and high interindividual and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability, necessitating therapeutic drug monitoring to individualize dosage. "( Validation of an LC-MS/MS method to measure tacrolimus in rat kidney and liver tissue and its application to human kidney biopsies.
Coller, JK; Hesselink, DA; Morris, RG; Noll, BD; Russ, GR; Sallustio, BC; Somogyi, AA; Van Gelder, T, 2013
)
2.09
"Tacrolimus has been used as immunosuppressive agent."( [Donor heart preservation with University of Wisconsin solution and immunosuppressive therapy with drip-infusion of tacrolimus].
Tanoue, Y; Tominaga, R, 2013
)
1.32
"As tacrolimus has a rather narrow therapeutic range and high individual variability in its pharmacokinetics, it is important to determine the cause of the variation in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. "( Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacogenetic model of tacrolimus in the early period after kidney transplantation.
Ha, J; Ha, S; Han, N; Kim, IW; Kim, MG; Lee, JI; Min, SI; Oh, JM; Yun, HY, 2014
)
1.27
"Tacrolimus has been shown to be associated with better QOL than cyclosporine (ciclosporin), as has corticosteroid-free immunosuppressive regimens."( Quality of life of older patients undergoing renal transplantation: finding the right immunosuppressive treatment.
Perlman, RL; Rao, PS, 2014
)
1.12
"Tacrolimus (FK506) use has been suggested as a risk factor for post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) because it can impair insulin secretion. "( Association between use of FK506 and prevalence of post-transplantation diabetes mellitus in kidney transplant patients.
Chiang, YJ; Chou, HF; Hsieh, CY; Lin, MH; Lin, SC; Wei, TY; Weng, LC, 2014
)
1.85
"Tacrolimus has originally been registered as a twice-daily formulation (Prograf, Tac BID), although a once-daily formulation (Advagraf, Tac QD) is also available. "( Lower variability in 24-hour exposure during once-daily compared to twice-daily tacrolimus formulation in kidney transplantation.
Christiaans, MH; Stifft, F; Stolk, LM; Undre, N; van Hooff, JP, 2014
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus has specific features in Chinese transplant patients; its in vivo pharmacokinetics, treatment regimen, dose and administration, and adverse-effect profile are influenced by multiple factors, such as genetics and the spectrum of primary diseases in the Chinese population."( Tacrolimus in preventing transplant rejection in Chinese patients--optimizing use.
Li, CJ; Li, L, 2015
)
2.58
"Tacrolimus has shown efficacy in patients with ulcerative colitis."( Tacrolimus for remission induction in ulcerative colitis: Mayo endoscopic subscore 0 and 1 predict long-term prognosis.
Hanai, H; Iida, T; Ikeya, K; Kawasaki, S; Maruyama, Y; Sugimoto, K; Watanabe, F, 2015
)
3.3
"Tacrolimus has been reported to be an offending agent, which potentially plays a role in the pathophysiological process of SOS."( Reversible sinusoidal obstruction syndrome associated with tacrolimus following liver transplantation.
Feng, XW; Geng, L; Shen, T; Zheng, SS, 2015
)
1.38
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index."( Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Solid-Organ Transplant Patients.
Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2015
)
1.41
"Tacrolimus has gained acceptance in the management of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) in children. "( Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.
Agarwal, I; Chaturvedi, S; Fleming, D; Jahan, A; Mathew, B; Prabha, R, 2015
)
2.12
"Tacrolimus has not been extensively studied for the treatment of psoriasis."( Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Tacrolimus in Adult Patients With Refractory Severe Plaque Psoriasis.
Dogra, S; Mittal, A; Narang, T; Sharma, A, 2016
)
1.4
"Tacrolimus (TAC) has proved to show efficacy against inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors, yet its add-on effects on TCZ remain unknown."( The efficacy and safety of additional administration of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who showed an inadequate response to tocilizumab.
Ebina, K; Hashimoto, J; Hirao, M; Kaneshiro, S; Nagayama, Y; Nampei, A; Nishikawa, M; Noguchi, T; Owaki, H; Takahi, K; Tsuboi, H; Yoshikawa, H, 2017
)
1.42
"Tacrolimus has long been the cornerstone of the immunosuppressive standard-of-care in kidney transplantation. "( Once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus formulations for kidney transplantation: what the nephrologist needs to know.
Cremaschi, E; Maggiore, U; Piotti, G, 2017
)
2.19
"Tacrolimus (TAC) has exhibited promising therapeutic potential in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); however, its application is prevented by its poor solubility, instability, poor bioavailability, and negative systemic side effects. "( Nanocomposite microparticles (nCmP) for the delivery of tacrolimus in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Cuddigan, JL; Gupta, SK; Meenach, SA; Wang, Z, 2016
)
2.12
"Tacrolimus has been shown to be neuroprotective in the rat cavernous nerve injury model, an animal model representative of the neural injury that occurs in humans at the time of radical prostatectomy."( Use of low-dose tacrolimus and associated hypomagnesemia in the prevention of erectile dysfunction following prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
First, MR; Fitzsimmons, WE; Henning, AK, 2016
)
1.5
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window and considerable variability in clinical use. "( Application of Machine-Learning Models to Predict Tacrolimus Stable Dose in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Feng, GW; Hu, YF; Liu, MZ; Liu, R; Meng, XG; Ming, YZ; Shang, WJ; Shao, MJ; Tang, J; Xin, HW; Zhang, LR; Zhang, W; Zhang, YL; Zhu, LJ, 2017
)
2.15
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index; therefore, it is essential that the physicochemical properties of generic formulations be identical to the brand-name formulation, Prograf."( Physiochemical properties of generic formulations of tacrolimus in Mexico.
First, MR; Iwabe, O; Kitamura, S; Mimura, H; Ohara, T; Petan, JA; Saito, K; Suzuki, M; Undre, N, 2008
)
1.32
"Tacrolimus has been associated with less rejection and better kidney function compared with cyclosporine in clinical trials."( Five-year study of tacrolimus as secondary intervention versus continuation of cyclosporine in renal transplant patients at risk for chronic renal allograft failure.
Arlen, D; Barrett, B; Boucher, A; Cardella, C; Cockfield, SM; Jevnikar, A; Kiberd, B; Paraskevas, S; Rush, D; Shapiro, J; Shoker, A; Yilmaz, S; Zaltzman, JS, 2008
)
1.4
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has been widely used as an immunosuppressant. "( Tacrolimus-induced apoptotic signal transduction pathway.
Choi, SJ; Chung, SY; You, HS, 2008
)
3.23
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has been used as a therapeutic drug beneficial for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in humans. "( Predominant promotion by tacrolimus of chondrogenic differentiation to proliferating chondrocytes.
Hinoi, E; Kodama, A; Nakamura, Y; Takarada, T; Yoneda, Y, 2009
)
2.1
"Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment has superior efficacy to fluticasone 0.005% ointment for twice-daily treatment of adults with moderate to severe facial AD in whom conventional therapy was inadequately effective or not tolerated. "( Superiority of tacrolimus 0.1% ointment compared with fluticasone 0.005% in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis of the face: results from a randomized, double-blind trial.
Doss, N; Dubertret, L; Fekete, GL; Kamoun, MR; Lahfa, M; Ortonne, JP; Reitamo, S, 2009
)
2.15
"Tacrolimus ointment has shown efficacy as monotherapy in both short- and long-term studies in atopic dermatitis. "( Long-term safety of tacrolimus ointment in atopic dermatitis.
Reitamo, S; Remitz, A, 2009
)
2.12
"Tacrolimus has been shown to be an important immunosuppressive agent in organ and bone marrow transplantation. "( A 6-month, multicenter, single-arm pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of generic tacrolimus (TacroBell) after primary renal transplantation.
Cho, BH; Han, DJ; Huh, KH; Kang, CM; Kim, HC; Kim, SJ; Kim, YL; Kim, YS; Lee, S; Moon, IS, 2009
)
2.01
"Tacrolimus has shown promising results in the treatment of various dermatological diseases, including hair loss. "( Topical tacrolimus suppresses the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and insulin-like growth factor-1 in late anagen.
Tu, P; Wang, Y; Wu, L; Yang, S, 2009
)
2.23
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has shown some benefit in lupus nephritis in small trials, and combined with mycophenolate mofetil is standard immunosuppression in transplant patients."( Combination therapy of mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus in lupus nephritis.
Fine, DM; Lanata, CM; Mahmood, T; Petri, M, 2010
)
1.34
"Tacrolimus has been often described to induce neuropathy in liver-, pancreas-, and renal-transplanted patients. "( Tacrolimus-induced polyneuropathy after heart transplantation.
Labate, A; Morelli, M; Palamara, G; Pirritano, D; Quattrone, A, 2010
)
3.25
"Tacrolimus has a low potential for systemic accumulation, and analysis of long-term studies indicates that it has a good safety profile."( The safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis.
Eichenfield, LF; McCollum, AD; Paik, A,
)
1.15
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window and shows significant interindividual difference in dose requirement. "( Using genetic and clinical factors to predict tacrolimus dose in renal transplant recipients.
Elliott, E; Gaber, AO; Mao, Y; Patel, S; Razo, J; Shea, E; Wang, P; Wong, ST; Wu, AH; Zhou, X, 2010
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus has been considered less nephrotoxic than cyclosporine, but direct quantitative comparisons of the changes in renal structure from baseline to follow-up biopsies have not been done."( Tacrolimus and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity in native kidneys of pancreas transplant recipients.
Fioretto, P; Mauer, M; Najafian, B; Sutherland, DE, 2011
)
2.53
"Tacrolimus has been responsible for significant changes in plasma lipid concentrations only for the first six months, but not for the remaining time of observation."( Long-term assessment of plasma lipids in transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus in relation to fatty liver.
Basile, V; Capone, D; Federico, S; Kadilli, I; Palmiero, G; Perfetti, A; Polichetti, G; Sabbatini, M; Tarantino, G,
)
1.08
"Tacrolimus has become an important cornerstone in the prevention of rejection after kidney transplantation. "( Tacrolimus-induced neutropenia in renal transplant recipients.
De Rycke, A; Dierickx, D; Kuypers, DR, 2011
)
3.25
"Tacrolimus has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). "( One thousand consecutive primary liver transplants under tacrolimus immunosuppression: a 17- to 20-year longitudinal follow-up.
Cacciarelli, T; DeVera, ME; Fontes, P; Humar, A; Jain, A; Lopez, RC; Marsh, JW; Mazariegos, G; Sindhi, R; Singhal, A, 2011
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has been used successfully as a systemic immunomodulator for more than 2 decades, and numerous studies have investigated its mechanisms of action. "( Tacrolimus in the treatment of ocular diseases.
Chen, J; Gu, J; Yuan, J; Zhai, J, 2011
)
3.25
"Tacrolimus has a wide spectrum of adverse effects, including neurotoxic and vascular events. "( Effect of tacrolimus on energy metabolism in human umbilical endothelial cells.
Bednarczyk, J; Brockmann, M; Das, A; Göken, C; Hoy, L; Illsinger, S; Janzen, N; Lücke, T; Schmidt, KH; Thiemann, I,
)
1.98
"Tacrolimus has been associated with severe neurotoxicity in organ transplant patients. "( Catatonia as a manifestation of tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity in organ transplant patients: a case series.
Chopra, A; Das, P; Huston, J; Kuppuswamy, PS; Li, X; Philbrick, K; Rai, A; Sola, C,
)
1.86
"Tacrolimus (FK-506) has been found to exhibit potent inhibitory effects on spontaneously developed dermatitis. "( Therapeutic effects of combination using glucosamine plus tacrolimus (FK-506) on the development of atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in NC/Nga mice.
Cheong, KA; Kim, CH; Lee, AY; Park, CD, 2012
)
2.07
"Tacrolimus has been associated with several ocular adverse effects, such as optic neuropathy."( Unilateral tacrolimus-associated optic neuropathy after liver transplantation.
Ascaso, FJ; Cristóbal, JA; Huerva, V; Mateo, J, 2012
)
2.21
"Tacrolimus has proven its usefulness in solid organ transplants, but this study demonstrates that it is essential to carry out close monitoring through the application of pharmacokinetic concepts to optimize therapy."( Tacrolimus levels in adult patients with renal transplant.
González-López, EH; Robles-Piedras, AL, 2009
)
2.52
"Tacrolimus has been reported to be effective in refractory nephrotic syndrome, such as focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and membranous nephropathy. "( Tacrolimus improves the proteinuria remission in patients with refractory IgA nephropathy.
Chen, YQ; Liu, LJ; Lv, JC; Shi, SF; Wang, HY; Zhang, H; Zhang, Q; Zhu, L, 2012
)
3.26
"As tacrolimus (FK506) has been reported to inhibit the effects of TGF-β1 on cultured fibroblasts, we hypothesized that FK506 may be useful in treating keloids."( FK506 inhibits the enhancing effects of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 on collagen expression and TGF-β/Smad signalling in keloid fibroblasts: implication for new therapeutic approach.
Fang, AH; Lan, CC; Wu, CS; Wu, PH, 2012
)
0.89
"Tacrolimus ointment has shown efficacy in treating T-cell-mediated inflammatory oral mucosal diseases, including lichen planus. "( Effects of tacrolimus on an organotypic raft-culture model mimicking oral mucosa.
Laine, MA; Lukkarinen, H; Pöllänen, M; Rautava, J; Soukka, T; Willberg, J, 2012
)
2.21
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has been shown to have functions on inducing immunosuppression and augmenting apoptosis of pathologic T cells in autoimmune disease."( Treg cell resistance to apoptosis in DNA vaccination for experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis treatment.
Gao, W; Kang, J; Kang, Y; Sun, Y; Wang, B; Wang, Y; Xia, G; Zhang, J, 2012
)
1.1
"Tacrolimus has improved hyperlipidaemia in our cyclosporin previously treated patients and increased the resistance to oxidation of high and low-density lipoproteins."( [Effect of cyclosporin and tacrolimus on lipoprotein oxidation after renal transplantation].
Alsina, J; Fiol, C; Gil-Vernet, S; Gómez-Gerique, N; Grinyó, JM; Hurtado, I; Martínez Castelao, A; Ramos, R; Sabaté, I; Serón, D; Yzaguirre, MT, 2002
)
2.05
"Tacrolimus has also been developed for chronic rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and several other autoimmune diseases [351891], [352195], [360717]."( Tacrolimus Fujisawa.
Gewirtz, AT; Sitaraman, SV, 2002
)
2.48
"Tacrolimus has been suspected to alter mitochondrial respiration of different tissues but sirolimus has not been evaluated."( Tacrolimus and sirolimus decrease oxidative phosphorylation of isolated rat kidney mitochondria.
Bruguerolle, B; Morin, C; Simon, N; Tillement, JP; Urien, S, 2003
)
2.48
"Tacrolimus has a dose-dependent effect on tumor progression and TGF-beta(1) expression, and tacrolimus-induced TGF-beta(1) overexpression may be a pathogenetic mechanism in tumor progression."( Tacrolimus enhances transforming growth factor-beta1 expression and promotes tumor progression.
Lagman, M; Li, B; Maluccio, M; Sharma, V; Suthanthiran, M; Vyas, S; Yang, H, 2003
)
3.2
"Tacrolimus has been increasingly used in solid-organ transplantation, and the effect of the drug on pregnancy is still of interest to clinicians."( Pregnancy after liver transplantation with tacrolimus immunosuppression: a single center's experience update at 13 years.
Cacciarelli, TV; de Vera, ME; Eghtesad, B; Fontes, PA; Fung, JJ; Jain, AB; Marcos, A; Marsh, JW; Mazariegos, G; Rafail, A; Reyes, J; Starzl, TE, 2003
)
1.3
"Tacrolimus has a similar (but not identical) mechanism of action, and was introduced in the 1990s."( Calcineurin inhibitor-associated early renal insufficiency in cardiac transplant recipients: risk factors and strategies for prevention and treatment.
Baran, DA; Galin, ID; Gass, AL, 2004
)
1.04
"Tacrolimus (Tac) has immunosuppressant properties similar to those of cyclosporine A (CsA), but it is more potent. "( Conversion from cyclosporine A to tacrolimus in pediatric kidney transplant recipients with chronic rejection: changes in the immune responses.
Cardoni, RL; Ferraris, JR; Prigoshin, N; Tambutti, ML, 2004
)
2.05
"Tacrolimus therapy has contributed much to the success rates of both heart and lung transplantation, and by 2001, it had become the preeminent immunosuppressant agent used in lung transplantation."( An update on clinical outcomes in heart and lung transplantation.
Garrity, ER; Mehra, MR, 2004
)
1.04
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has been increasingly used in place of cyclosporine (CSP), and several studies have shown that FK506 reduces the incidence of acute GVHD more effectively than does CSP."( Tacrolimus instead of cyclosporine used for prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease improves outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors, but not from HLA-identical sibling donors: a nationwide survey conducted in Jap
Atsuta, Y; Emi, N; Hamajima, N; Hirabayashi, N; Hiraoka, A; Iwato, K; Kanda, Y; Kato, S; Naoe, T; Okamoto, S; Sakamaki, H; Takahashi, S; Tanimoto, M; Tanosaki, R; Yanada, M, 2004
)
2.49
"Tacrolimus (Tac) has a more potent immunosuppressive effect and may be less toxic at therapeutic doses than ciclosporin (CsA)."( Treatment of focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis in adults with tacrolimus monotherapy.
Cairns, TD; Dhaygude, A; Duncan, N; Griffith, M; McLean, AG; Owen, J; Palmer, A; Taube, D, 2004
)
1.28
"A tacrolimus-based regimen has been successfully used for our living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients."( Conversion to cyclosporine provides valuable rescue therapy for living donor adult liver transplant patients intolerant to tacrolimus: A single-center experience at the University of Tokyo.
Akamatsu, N; Kaneko, J; Kishi, Y; Makuuchi, M; Murai, N; Sugawara, Y; Tamura, S, 2004
)
1.09
"Tacrolimus has become an effective alternative to cyclosporine as a component of primary immunosuppression in pediatric renal transplant patients, but the information on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of tacrolimus in young patients is still limited. "( Effect of age, ethnicity, and glucocorticoid use on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in pediatric renal transplant patients.
Aviles, DH; Kim, JS; Leblanc, PL; Matti Vehaskari, V; Silverstein, DM, 2005
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus has been increasingly used for liver transplantation during the last decade. "( Tacrolimus for primary liver transplantation: 12 to 15 years actual follow-up with safety profile.
Costa, G; De Vera, M; Eghtesad, B; Fontas, P; Fung, J; Gadomski, M; Jain, A; Kashyap, R; Marcos, A; Marsh, W; Mazariagos, G; Patel, K; Reyes, J; Starzl, T, 2005
)
3.21
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window, and bioavailability is known to vary considerably between renal transplant recipients. "( AUC-guided dosing of tacrolimus prevents progressive systemic overexposure in renal transplant recipients.
Cremers, SC; de Fijter, JW; den Hartigh, J; Paul, LC; Rowshani, AT; Schoemaker, RC; Scholten, EM; van Kan, EJ, 2005
)
2.09
"Tacrolimus has been shown to provide superior immunosuppression in various solid organ transplant settings. "( Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine induction therapy in pulmonary transplantation in miniature swine.
Avsar, M; Haverich, A; Niedermeyer, J; Reinhard, R; Simon, AR; Steinkamp, T; Strüber, M; Warnecke, G, 2005
)
3.21
"Tacrolimus therapy has been associated with anemia after transplantation, and recent clinical evidence in children suggests its association with the development of neutropenia for which an alternative etiology is not apparent."( Tacrolimus: in vitro effects on myelopoiesis, apoptosis, and CD11b expression.
Koenig, JM; Matharoo, N; Schowengerdt, KO; Stegner, JJ, 2005
)
2.49
"Tacrolimus (Tac) has been shown to be more favourable in this respect."( Potential cardiovascular risk factors in paediatric renal transplant recipients.
Ferraris, JR; Ghezzi, L; Krmar, RT; Waisman, G, 2006
)
1.06
"Tacrolimus (TAC) has been prescribed for maintaining remission of NS in patients who have developed treatment resistance or adverse effects with cyclosporin A (CYA) at our institution since 1995."( Treatment of severe steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) in children with tacrolimus.
Clark, AG; MacLeod, R; Rigby, E; Sinha, MD, 2006
)
1.28
"Tacrolimus has been reported to be effective in several inflammatory skin disorders such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, lichen planus, lupus erythematosus and pyoderma gangraenosum."( [Topical treatment of bullous pemphigoid with tacrolimus. Case report with brief literature review].
Bieber, T; Philipp-Dormston, W; Tüting, T; Wenzel, J, 2005
)
1.31
"Tacrolimus has been demonstrated to provide long-term immunosuppression and prevent rejection in most renal transplants."( Tacrolimus as basic immunosuppression in pregnancy after renal transplantation. A single-center experience.
Acevedo, M; Andrés, A; Garcia-Donaire, JA; Gutiérrez, E; Gutiérrez, MJ; Manzanera, MJ; Morales, JM; Oliva, E, 2005
)
2.49
"Tacrolimus also has nephrotoxic effects, which can be reversed by converting to rapamycin."( Tacrolimus-related neurologic and renal complications in liver transplantation: A single-center experience.
Ayvaz, I; Emiroglu, R; Haberal, M; Karakayali, H; Moray, G, 2006
)
2.5
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window and a wide interindividual variation in its pharmacokinetics. "( Influence of different allelic variants of the CYP3A and ABCB1 genes on the tacrolimus pharmacokinetic profile of Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Bekers, O; Chan, HW; Chau, KF; Cheung, CY; de Vrie, JE; Kwan, TH; Leung, KT; Li, CS; Op den Buijsch, RA; van Dieijen-Visser, MP; Wijnen, PA; Wong, KM, 2006
)
2.01
"Tacrolimus has been used successfully to treat a number of T cell-mediated diseases."( Tacrolimus ointment 0.1% alone and in combination with medium-dose UVA1 in the treatment of palmar or plantar psoriasis.
Janiga, J; Lim, HW; Rivard, J, 2006
)
2.5
"Tacrolimus ointment has also been compared to standard topical cortico-steroid treatments and is equally effective if not superior to several topical steroids."( Tacrolimus: focusing on atopic dermatitis.
Carroll, CL; Fleischer, AB, 2006
)
2.5
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has a neuroprotective action on cerebral infarction produced by cerebral ischemia, however, detailed mechanisms underlying this action have not been fully elucidated. "( Tacrolimus (FK506) attenuates biphasic cytochrome c release and Bad phosphorylation following transient cerebral ischemia in mice.
Furuichi, Y; Li, JY; Matsuoka, N; Mutoh, S; Yanagihara, T, 2006
)
3.22
"Tacrolimus has the potential to be a useful and highly effective treatment for RA."( Comparison of tacrolimus and mizoribine in a randomized, double-blind controlled study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Abe, T; Hashimoto, H; Kawai, S; Kiuchi, T; Kondo, H; Murayama, T, 2006
)
1.42
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window and is characterized by a large inter-individual variability in bioavailability. "( Tacrolimus exposure and evolution of renal allograft histology in the first year after transplantation.
Damme, BV; Kuypers, DR; Lerut, E; Naesens, M; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2007
)
3.23
"Tacrolimus has been used extensively for immunosuppressive therapy in pediatric liver transplant recipients. "( Fatty liver due to high levels of serum tacrolimus after liver transplantation.
Ankan, C; Aydoğdu, S; Kihiç, M; Nart, D; Tümgör, G,
)
1.84
"Tacrolimus has been a useful therapeutic tool in dermatology practice ever since its inception. "( Tacrolimus: approved and unapproved dermatologic indications/uses-physician's sequential literature survey: part II.
Dogra, S; Sehgal, VN; Srivastava, G,
)
3.02
"Tacrolimus has shown efficacy in the prophylaxis of allograft rejection in both animals and human clinical trials, and has been used effectively to rescue patients who have exhibited refractory rejection failing cyclosporine prophylaxis."( Tacrolimus, a new immunosuppressant--a review of the literature.
Hooks, MA, 1994
)
2.45
"Tacrolimus (FK 506) has synergistic immunosuppressive effects in combination with corticosteroids. "( Combined inhibition effects of tacrolimus and methylprednisolone on in vitro human lymphocyte proliferation.
Jusko, WJ; Lee, MJ; Pyszczynski, N, 1995
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus has been found to be useful in clinical solid organ transplantation. "( Capillary blood versus arterial or venous blood for tacrolimus monitoring in liver transplantation.
Fung, JJ; Jain, AB; Lever, J; Pinna, A; Singhal, AK; Venkataramanan, R; Warty, V, 1995
)
1.98
"Tacrolimus monotherapy has been associated with improved body growth and less obesity, while tacrolimus alone or in combination with prednisone was virtually free of hirsutism or gingival hypertrophy, and posed a low risk for hypertension."( Clinical use of tacrolimus (FK-506) in infants and children with renal transplants.
Ellis, D, 1995
)
1.36
"Tacrolimus has been used successfully in kidney/ pancreas transplantation, with 100% patient, 95% kidney, and 79% pancreas graft survival."( The superiority of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients -- the Pittsburgh experience.
Corry, RJ; Egidi, F; Ellis, D; Gilboa, N; Gritsch, HA; Jordan, ML; McCauley, J; Scantlebury, VP; Shapiro, R; Vivas, C, 1995
)
1.34
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has recently been approved for immunosuppression in organ transplantation, although its use is accompanied by a wide spectrum of neurotoxic side effects. "( Immunosuppression-induced leukoencephalopathy from tacrolimus (FK506)
Bramblett, GT; Eidelman, BH; Fukui, MB; Small, SL, 1996
)
1.99
"Tacrolimus has also shown efficacy as a rescue agent for renal allograft rejection failing conventional therapy in 74% of cases."( The use of tacrolimus in renal transplantation.
Ellis, D; Gilboa, N; Gritsch, HA; Jordan, ML; Scantlebury, V; Shapiro, R; Starzl, TE; Vivas, CA, 1996
)
1.41
"Tacrolimus has been effective both in primary and rescue therapy following steroid and OKT3-resistant acute rejection in liver and kidney transplantation. "( Rescue therapy with tacrolimus in simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplantation.
Albrecht, KH; Becker, G; Friedrich, J; Heemann, U; Philipp, T; Wagner, K; Witzke, O, 1997
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus has a negative effect on the pancreatic beta islet cell, and both glucose intolerance and diabetes mellitus are well-recognized complications of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression among adult solid organ transplant recipients."( New-onset diabetes mellitus in pediatric thoracic organ recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.
Boyle, GJ; Cipriani, L; Fricker, FJ; Griffith, BP; Kurland, G; Miller, SA; Wagner, K; Webber, SA, 1997
)
1.97
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has a mechanism of action similar to cyclosporine. "( Preliminary report on the use of oral tacrolimus (FK506) in the treatment of complicated proximal small bowel and fistulizing Crohn's disease.
Sandborn, WJ, 1997
)
2.01
"Tacrolimus, however, has undergone limited use in veterinary medicine."( Cyclosporine and tacrolimus.
Vaden, SL, 1997
)
1.36
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has shown important regulatory effects on some inflammatory pathways, such as cytokines, neutrophils, and adhesion molecules."( Tacrolimus (FK506) down-regulates free radical tissue levels, serum cytokines, and neutrophil infiltration after severe liver ischemia.
Garcia-Criado, FJ; Gomez-Alonso, A; Misawa, K; Palma-Vargas, JM; Toledo, AH; Toledo-Pereyra, LH; Valdunciel-Garcia, JJ, 1997
)
2.46
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has recently become available clinically as an alternative to cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. "( FK506 effectiveness in reducing acute rejection after heart transplantation: a prospective randomized study.
Arbustini, E; Campana, C; Gavazzi, A; Goggi, C; Grossi, P; Ippoliti, G; Martinelli, L; Pellegrini, C; Regazzi, M; Rinaldi, M; Vigano, M, 1997
)
1.74
"Tacrolimus (FK 506) has been evaluated as immunosuppressive therapy in patients with a variety of solid organ and other transplants. "( Tacrolimus. An update of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of organ transplantation.
Gillis, JC; Goa, KL; Spencer, CM, 1997
)
3.18
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has potent immunosuppressive properties reflecting its ability to block the transcription of lymphokine genes in activated T cells through formation of a complex with FK506 binding protein-12, which inhibits the phosphatase activity of calcineurin. "( A tacrolimus-related immunosuppressant with reduced toxicity.
Barker, J; DaSilva, C; Dumont, FJ; Koo, G; Koprak, S; Parsons, WH; Pivnichny, J; Sigal, NH; Sinclair, PJ; Singer, I; Staruch, MJ; Talento, A; Williamson, AR; Wong, F; Woods, J; Wyvratt, M, 1998
)
2.46
"Tacrolimus has been shown to have a less adverse effect on the lipid profiles of transplant patients when the drug is started as induction therapy. "( Effects of tacrolimus on hyperlipidemia after successful renal transplantation: a Southeastern Organ Procurement Foundation multicenter clinical study.
Adams, PA; Armata, T; Blanton, J; Burdick, JF; Gaber, AO; Hayes, JM; Jonsson, J; Light, JA; McCune, TR; Mulloy, L; Peters, TG; Pruett, T; Rohr, MS; Selman, SH; Thacker LR, II; Wright, FH; Yium, J, 1998
)
2.13
"Tacrolimus (Prograf) has been shown to be effective for the prevention and treatment of allograft rejection in liver transplantation."( Tacrolimus (FK506) and mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy versus tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation.
Bynon, JS; Contreras, JL; Eckhoff, DE; Frenette, LR; Hudson, SL; McGuire, BM, 1998
)
2.46
"Tacrolimus has been shown to decrease nitric oxide synthesis."( Tacrolimus impairs wound healing: a possible role of decreased nitric oxide synthesis.
Becker, HD; Beiter, T; Bongartz, M; Fuchs, N; Proksch, B; Schäffer, MR, 1998
)
2.46
"Tacrolimus has already gained a high reputation as an induction-maintenance immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. "( [Is tacrolimus effective for ongoing renal allograft rejection?].
Akiyama, T; Hayashi, T; Higashi, Y; Imanishi, M; Ito, K; Kokado, Y; Kurita, T; Nishioka, T; Otomo, Y; Sagawa, S; Takahara, S, 1998
)
2.3
"Tacrolimus has been effective in the management of recalcitrant rejection in other solid organ transplants, and the initial experience in lung transplantation has been favorable."( Tacrolimus therapy for persistent or recurrent acute rejection after lung transplantation.
Horning, NR; Lynch, JP; Patterson, GA; Sundaresan, SR; Trulock, EP, 1998
)
2.46
"Tacrolimus has been shown to effect intracellular calcium and to prolong the action potential duration experimentally."( QT prolongation and near fatal cardiac arrhythmia after intravenous tacrolimus administration: a case report.
Alijani, MR; Gelfand, MC; Hodak, SP; Moubarak, JB; Rodriguez, I; Tracy, CM, 1998
)
1.26
"Tacrolimus has been used as a primary immunosuppressive agent in adult and pediatric renal transplant recipients, with reasonable outcomes. "( Pediatric renal transplantation under tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.
Ellis, D; Fung, JJ; Gilboa, N; Gritsch, HA; Hakala, TR; Irish, W; Jordan, ML; Lombardozzi-Lane, S; McCauley, J; Scantlebury, VP; Shapiro, R; Simmons, RL; Starzl, TE; Vivas, C, 1999
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus has also been used to rescue patients with refractory acute rejection, with a success rate of 70%-75%."( Tacrolimus in pediatric renal transplantation: a review.
Shapiro, R, 1998
)
2.46
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has a useful role as an immunosuppressive agent for the treatment of sight-threatening uveitis in patients who did not respond to cyclosporine either because of lack of therapeutic effect or unacceptable adverse effects."( Tacrolimus (FK506) in the treatment of posterior uveitis refractory to cyclosporine.
Dua, HS; Powell, RJ; Sloper, CM, 1999
)
3.19
"Tacrolimus has been shown to be a powerful suppressor of the immune system. "( Tacrolimus: the drug for the turn of the millennium?
Assmann, T; Homey, B; Ruzicka, T, 1999
)
3.19
"Tacrolimus has proved effective for preventing acute graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) after unrelated donor marrow transplantation, but the therapeutic window is apparently narrow. "( Relationship of tacrolimus whole blood levels to efficacy and safety outcomes after unrelated donor marrow transplantation.
Fay, JW; Fitzsimmons, WE; Maher, RM; Nash, RA; Przepiorka, D; Wingard, JR; Zhu, J, 1999
)
2.09
"Tacrolimus has been reported to cause HUS in renal and more recently in cardiac transplant patients."( Successful use of cyclosporine in a lung transplant recipient with tacrolimus-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome.
Burton, NA; Myers, JN; Nathan, SD; Shabshab, SF, 1999
)
1.26
"Tacrolimus has been shown to be more effective than cyclosporine for prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). "( Practical considerations in the use of tacrolimus for allogeneic marrow transplantation.
Devine, S; Fay, J; Przepiorka, D; Uberti, J; Wingard, J, 1999
)
2.02
"Tacrolimus has also demonstrated efficacy in various types of transplantation as rescue therapy in patients who experience persistent acute rejection (or significant adverse effect's) with cyclosporin-based therapy, whereas cyclosporin has not demonstrated a similar capacity to reverse refractory acute rejection."( Tacrolimus: a further update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in the management of organ transplantation.
Foster, RH; Plosker, GL, 2000
)
2.47
"Tacrolimus has been used as an immunosuppressive agent in the transplantation of all solid organs. "( Tacrolimus and myocardial hypertrophy.
Furusho, K; Inomata, Y; Nakata, Y; Tanaka, K; Uemoto, S; Yonemura, T; Yoshibayashi, M, 2000
)
3.19
"Tacrolimus has less nephrotoxicity than cyclosporin in this model. "( Tacrolimus has less fibrogenic potential than cyclosporin A in a model of renal ischaemia-reperfusion injury.
Bicknell, GR; Jain, S; Nicholson, ML, 2000
)
3.19
"Tacrolimus has a 10- to 100-fold greater in vitro immunosuppressive activity compared with cyclosporine."( New developments in the immunosuppressive drug monitoring of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and azathioprine.
Armstrong, VW; Oellerich, M, 2001
)
1.26
"Tacrolimus has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent in liver transplantation (LT). "( Does tacrolimus offer virtual freedom from chronic rejection after primary liver transplantation? Risk and prognostic factors in 1,048 liver transplantations with a mean follow-up of 6 years.
Blakomer, K; Demetris, AJ; Fung, JJ; Jain, A; Kashyap, R; Khan, A; Rohal, S; Ruppert, K; Starzl, TE, 2001
)
2.27
"Tacrolimus (FK506), has been marketed as an effective alternative immunosuppressant to cyclosporin A and recent subjective reports suggest patients taking it complain infrequently of gingival problems."( Tacrolimus is not associated with gingival overgrowth in renal transplant patients.
Campbell, BA; Hull, PS; Jamal, S; James, JA; Johnson, RW; Macfarlane, TV; Short, CD, 2001
)
2.47
"Tacrolimus has been shown to be effective topically in atopic dermatitis and systemically in psoriasis and graft-vs-host disease (GVHD)."( Tacrolimus ointment in the treatment of chronic cutaneous graft-vs-host disease: a case series of 18 patients.
Choi, CJ; Nghiem, P, 2001
)
2.47
"Tacrolimus (FK506) has been found to be 10-100 times more potent than cyclosporin and to penetrate skin much better due to a lower molecular weight."( Topical tacrolimus for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases.
Assmann, T; Homey, B; Ruzicka, T, 2001
)
1.47
"Tacrolimus has proven to be superior to cyclosporine-Sandimmune with regard to the prevention of acute rejections, but data comparing tacrolimus with Neoral are scarce. "( Single-center experience with tacrolimus versus cyclosporine-Neoral in renal transplant recipients.
Boots, JM; Christiaans, MH; Nieman, FH; van Duijnhoven, EM; van Hooff, JP; van Suylen, RJ, 2001
)
2.04
"Tacrolimus has been associated with similar efficacy and safety in heart transplant recipients compared with cyclosporine."( Conversion to tacrolimus for the treatment of cyclosporine-associated nephrotoxicity in heart transplant recipients.
Bloom, R; Brozena, S; Grossman, R; Israni, A; Pankewycz, O, 2002
)
1.4
"Tacrolimus has been found to be active in a topical formulation with the latter exerting its effects by acting on the signal transduction pathways inside T cells and inhibiting gene transcription."( Tacrolimus: a review of its use for the management of dermatoses.
Adamiak, A; Chow, M; Gupta, AK, 2002
)
2.48

Actions

Tacrolimus may cause local irritation, which mostly disappears after 2 weeks. It does not cause hirsutism or gingival hyperplasia, which are common disfiguring complications of cyclosporine. Tacrolims can lower cholesterol, LDL, and apolipoprotein B.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Tacrolimus can cause islet cell damage and decrease in insulin secretion which can lead to post-transplant diabetes mellitus and rarely diabetic ketoacidosis."( Tacrolimus-induced acute pancreatitis and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in pediatric kidney transplant recipient.
Gulati, S; Mazumder, MA; Mir, IM; Narula, AS; Shehwar, D, 2022
)
2.89
"LCP-tacrolimus displays enhanced oral bioavailability compared to immediate-release (IR-) tacrolimus. "( Tacrolimus Exposure Before and After a Switch From Twice-Daily Immediate-Release to Once-Daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus: The ENVARSWITCH Study.
Anglicheau, D; Buchler, M; Choukroun, G; Colosio, C; Conti, F; Crépin, S; Debette-Gratien, M; Dharancy, S; Duvoux, C; Etienne, I; Garrouste, C; Mariat, C; Marquet, P; Merville, P; Micallef, L; Monchaud, C; Rerolle, JP; Salamé, E; Saliba, F; Tafzi, N; Thierry, A; Woillard, JB, 2023
)
2.91
"Tacrolimus can inhibit pro-inflammatory synergistic action of TNF-α/IL-17A on human keratinocytes by regulating IκBζ expression."( Tacrolimus Inhibits TNF-α/IL-17A-Produced pro-Inflammatory Effect on Human Keratinocytes by Regulating IκBζ.
Guo, J; Hu, Y; Tu, J; Yin, L; Yin, Z, 2020
)
2.72
"Tacrolimus did increase the expression of pS264-AQP2 in the apical plasma membrane (by immunohistochemistry)."( Phosphatase inhibition increases AQP2 accumulation in the rat IMCD apical plasma membrane.
Efe, O; Ilori, TO; Klein, JD; Ren, H; Ruiz, JA; Sands, JM; Yang, B, 2016
)
1.16
"Tacrolimus can enhance outcomes in nerve allograft reconstruction and accelerates reinnervation of complex functional allograft transplants."( The role of immunophilin ligands in nerve regeneration.
Birchall, MA; Seifalian, AM; Toll, EC, 2011
)
1.09
"Tacrolimus appears to cause few if any functional changes in the SC of healthy human skin because of its poor permeability into skin with an intact barrier function."( Comparison of the effects of daily applications between topical corticosteroid and tacrolimus ointments on normal skin: evaluation with noninvasive methods.
Kikuchi, K; Tagami, H, 2002
)
1.98
"Tacrolimus could not inhibit the infection of Friend MuLV in all mice, furthermore, it could enhance the infection of Friend MuLV in F1 mice. "( Effects of tacrolimus on infection of Friend murine leukemia virus to Fv-4 gene heterozygous mice.
Chen, XB; Cheng, Z; Gu, HX; Yang, BF; Zhang, FM; Zhong, ZH, 2004
)
2.16
"Tacrolimus may cause local irritation, which mostly disappears after 2 weeks."( [Topical immunomodulators, such as tacrolimus and pimecrolimus, in the treatment of atopic dermatitis].
Bruijnzeel-Koomen, CA; de Bruin-Weller, MS, 2005
)
1.33
"Tacrolimus may inhibit activity of Caspase-3, attenuate apoptosis of neural cells and ameliorate neurological function recovery after SCI by inducing high expression of HSP 70."( [Effect of tacrolimus on apoptosis and expression of heat shock protein 70 after acute spinal cord injury in rats].
Chen, AM; Guo, FJ; Pan, F; Zhu, CL, 2006
)
2.17
"Tacrolimus patients had lower GCF MMP-8 levels than gingivitis (p<0.005), but levels similar to the healthy group."( Gingival crevicular fluid and serum matrix metalloproteinase-8 and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 levels in renal transplant patients undergoing different immunosuppressive therapy.
Afacan, B; Atilla, G; Emingil, G; Sorsa, T; Tervahartiala, T; Töz, H, 2008
)
1.07
"Tacrolimus is able to inhibit several cellular processes thought to be important in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, e.g."( Topical treatment of mild to moderate plaque psoriasis with 0.3% tacrolimus gel and 0.5% tacrolimus cream: the effect on SUM score, epidermal proliferation, keratinization, T-cell subsets and HLA-DR expression.
de Jong, EM; van de Kerkhof, PC; van Erp, PE; van Vlijmen, I; Vissers, WH, 2008
)
1.31
"Tacrolimus does not cause hirsutism or gingival hyperplasia, which are common disfiguring complications of cyclosporine."( Tacrolimus (FK506): the pros and cons of its use as an immunosuppressant in pediatric liver transplantation.
Cox, KL; Freese, DK, 1996
)
2.46
"Tacrolimus can lower cholesterol, LDL, and apolipoprotein B."( Effects of tacrolimus on hyperlipidemia after successful renal transplantation: a Southeastern Organ Procurement Foundation multicenter clinical study.
Adams, PA; Armata, T; Blanton, J; Burdick, JF; Gaber, AO; Hayes, JM; Jonsson, J; Light, JA; McCune, TR; Mulloy, L; Peters, TG; Pruett, T; Rohr, MS; Selman, SH; Thacker LR, II; Wright, FH; Yium, J, 1998
)
1.41
"For tacrolimus, Cminss displays a reasonable correlation with systemic drug exposure as measured by AUC, however, there is little correlation between Cminss and clinical events within recommended therapeutic ranges."( Pharmacological surrogates of allograft outcome.
Kahan, BD; Mahalati, K, 2000
)
0.79
"Tacrolimus did not activate the neural motilin receptor of the rabbit gastric antrum and had low affinity for the smooth-muscle motilin receptor."( In vitro evaluation of motilin agonism by macrolide immunosuppressive drugs.
De Vos, M; Depoortere, I; Lefebvre, R; Peeters, TL; Schoonjans, R; Van Vlem, B; Vanholder, R, 2002
)
1.04

Treatment

Tacrolimus treatment ameliorated mesangial alterations by suppressing the expressions of Th17-related cytokines such as IL-17 and IL-6. The most significant effect on the IOP was associated with glaucoma.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Tacrolimus treatment is effective and safe for VKC. "( When to start tacrolimus ointment for vernal keratoconjunctivitis? A proposed treatment protocol.
Arnon, R; Goldberg, D; Mostovoy, D; Niazov, Y; Rozen-Knisbacher, I; Sharabi-Nov, A; Stanescu, N; Yahalomi, T, 2022
)
2.52
"Tacrolimus treatment ameliorated mesangial alterations by suppressing the expressions of Th17-related cytokines such as IL-17 and IL-6."( Th17 Cells Participate in Thy1.1 Glomerulonephritis Which Is Ameliorated by Tacrolimus.
Fukusumi, Y; Kawachi, H; Kazama, JJ; Takada, A; Watanabe, S; Yasuda, H; Zhang, Y, 2022
)
1.67
"Tacrolimus treatment prolonged allograft survival in the allogeneic transplantation model and enhanced tumor growth in both subcutaneous and orthotopic HCC models. "( Therapeutic Effects of Anti-PD1 Immunotherapy on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Under Administration of Tacrolimus.
Chen, CH; Chou, HC; Hsu, PN; Hsu, YC; Huang, HF; Lee, HS; Lee, YT; Lin, SW; Sheu, JC; Su, CW; Wang, LF; Weng, MT; Wu, MC; Wu, YM, 2023
)
2.57
"Tacrolimus pre-treatment dose-dependently resulted in lesser seizure severity according to Racine's scale, delayed start-up latency of the first myoclonic jerk and attenuated the spike percentages detected by EEG in seizure-induced rats."( Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus Treatment Delays Acute Seizure Occurrence, Reduces Elevated Oxidative Stress, and Reverses PGF2α Burst in the Brain of PTZ-Treated Rats.
Egilmez, CB; Erbas, O; Erdogan, MA; Pazarlar, BA, 2023
)
1.97
"Tacrolimus (TAC)-based treatment is associated with nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for this toxicity have not been fully explored. "( Pathway-level multi-omics analysis of the molecular mechanisms underlying the toxicity of long-term tacrolimus exposure.
Cho, YS; Kim, DH; Long, NP; Moon, KS; Oh, JH; Park, SM; Phat, NK; Shin, JG; Thu, VTA; Yen, NTH, 2023
)
2.57
"Tacrolimus treatment induced oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, and autophagic activity was enhanced in the kidney organoids."( Human kidney organoids model the tacrolimus nephrotoxicity and elucidate the role of autophagy.
Ju, JH; Kim, D; Kim, DS; Kim, HL; Kim, HW; Kim, J; Kim, JW; Kim, YK; Lee, JY; Lim, SW; Nam, SA; Seo, E; Yang, CW, 2021
)
1.62
"In tacrolimus-treated eyes, the most significant effect on the IOP was associated with glaucoma history or medication; however, its effect on the IOP was limited to 1.7 mmHg elevation (P = 0.006)."( Reduced steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation in tacrolimus-treated refractory allergic ocular diseases.
Ebihara, N; Fujishima, H; Fukushima, A; Inoue, Y; Miyazaki, D; Namba, K; Ohashi, Y; Okamoto, S; Shimizu, D; Shoji, J; Takamura, E; Uchio, E, 2020
)
1.32
"Tacrolimus-treated recipients experienced a lower risk of gestational hypertension (28.0%; OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.27-2.39; p < 0.01)."( Pregnancy outcomes in female patients exposed to cyclosporin-based versus tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens after liver/kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, P; Chen, X; Dai, R; Gong, X; Li, J; Liu, L; Yan, J, 2021
)
1.57
"Tacrolimus was treated to a goal serum trough of > 5 ng/mL and prednisone was tapered every month."( Adapting MRI as a clinical outcome measure for a facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy trial of prednisone and tacrolimus: case report.
Bindschadler, M; Friedman, SD; Johnstone, LM; Tapscott, SJ; Wang, LH, 2021
)
1.55
"Tacrolimus-treated mice showed no difference in innate susceptibility following primary infection, whereas susceptibility to secondary challenge was significantly increased."( Tacrolimus exposure windows responsible for Listeria monocytogenes infection susceptibility.
Erickson, JJ; Gregory, EJ; Miller-Handley, H; Prasanphanich, NS; Shao, TY; Way, SS, 2021
)
2.79
"The tacrolimus-treated EAE groups exhibited less demyelination and inflammation and weak immunoreactivity for all of the immunization biomarkers."( The Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Oral-Formulated Tacrolimus in Mice with Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis.
Ahn, SW; Jeon, GS; Kim, JM; Kim, MJ; Kim, SH; Mun, SK; Sung, JJ, 2017
)
1.19
"Tacrolimus treatment significantly altered the relative abundance of Allobaculum, Bacteroides, and Lactobacillus and CD4"( Immunosuppressive effect of the gut microbiome altered by high-dose tacrolimus in mice.
Hu, X; Jiao, W; Liu, L; Mukherjee, A; Sun, Z; Tang, H; Xu, Y; Zeng, S; Zhang, Q; Zhang, X; Zhang, Z, 2018
)
1.44
"Tacrolimus group was pre-treated with tacrolimus (100 nM) for 0.5 h, and the autophagy inhibition group was pre-treated with 3-methyladenine (3-MA) (10 mM) and tacrolimus (100 nM) for 0.5 h."( Tacrolimus alleviates Ox-LDL damage through inducing vascular endothelial autophagy.
Duan, XT; Shao, N; Xu, XS; Zhang, X; Zhang, YF, 2018
)
2.64
"Tacrolimus treatment in diabetic rats further decreased the BDNF expression level in the DG and CA3 region."( Influence of Tacrolimus on Depressive-Like Behavior in Diabetic Rats Through Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Regulation in the Hippocampus.
Chun, YT; Chung, BH; Cui, S; Hong, S; Kang, HG; Ko, EJ; Lee, J; Lee, MY; Lim, SW; Luo, K; Quan, Y; Shin, YJ; Yang, CW, 2019
)
1.6
"Tacrolimus treatment was associated with a higher incidence of dysglycaemia at 3 and 6 months."( Continuous glucose monitoring after kidney transplantation in non-diabetic patients: early hyperglycaemia is frequent and may herald post-transplantation diabetes mellitus and graft failure.
Bringer, J; Mourad, G; Renard, E; Wojtusciszyn, A, 2013
)
1.11
"Tacrolimus treatment was discontinued and oral clarithromycin (800 mg/day), rifampicin (450 mg/day), and ethambutol (750 mg/day) treatment was initiated."( Paradoxical response to disseminated non-tuberculosis mycobacteriosis treatment in a patient receiving tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor: a case report.
Imamura, Y; Izumikawa, K; Kakeya, H; Kohno, S; Miyazaki, T; Nakamura, S; Takazono, T; Yanagihara, K, 2014
)
1.12
"Tacrolimus treatment significantly increased blood glucose concentrations (p < 0.05) and lowered HOMA-ß and ISI (p < 0.01) in a time- and dose-dependent manner. "( Tacrolimus reversibly reduces insulin secretion, induces insulin resistance, and causes islet cell damage in rats.
Li, CF; Liu, XJ; Niu, YJ; Shen, ZY; Teng, YQ; Wang, HY; Wang, LT; Xu, C; Yin, JP, 2014
)
3.29
"Tacrolimus treatment resulted in a reduction of albuminuria; its discontinuation restored albuminuria to the initial levels."( Early alteration of kidney function in nonuremic type 1 diabetic islet transplant recipients under tacrolimus-mycophenolate therapy.
Efendi, A; Gillard, P; Gorus, F; Hilbrands, R; Jacobs-Tulleneers-Thevissen, D; Keymeulen, B; Kuypers, D; Lee, DH; Ling, Z; Mathieu, C; Pipeleers, D; Rustandi, M, 2014
)
1.34
"Tacrolimus treatment alone did not cause overt renal or pancreatic islet injury, but the addition of EVR significantly enhanced the TAC-induced organ injury, as demonstrated by aggravated nephrotoxicity and pancreatic islet dysfunction. "( Combined treatment of tacrolimus and everolimus increases oxidative stress by pharmacological interactions.
Bae, SK; Chung, BH; Doh, KC; Heo, SB; Jin, L; Li, C; Lim, SW; Piao, SG; Yang, CW; Zheng, YF, 2014
)
2.16
"In tacrolimus-treated rats a lower intensity of apoptosis was found in the distal tubules."( The effect of immunosuppressive therapy on renal cell apoptosis in native rat kidneys.
Baranowska-Bosiacka, I; Bober, J; Ciechanowski, K; Domański, L; Domański, M; Kabat-Koperska, J; Kedzierska, K; Kolasa, A; Osekowska, B; Parafiniuk, M; Safranow, K; Sindrewicz, K; Smektała, T; Sporniak-Tutak, K; Urasińska, E, 2015
)
0.93
"Tacrolimus BD treatment was significantly associated with inferior graft (risk ratio: 1.81; p = 0.001) and patient survival (risk ratio: 1.72; p = 0.004) in multivariate analyses."( Improved survival in liver transplant recipients receiving prolonged-release tacrolimus in the European Liver Transplant Registry.
Adam, R; Baccarani, U; Bachellier, P; Bechstein, WO; Boudjema, K; Colledan, M; Delvart, V; Dokmak, S; Ericzon, BG; Hanvesakul, R; Karam, V; Klempnauer, J; Kollmar, O; Krawczyk, M; Mantion, G; Muiesan, P; Němec, P; Neuhaus, P; Paul, A; Pratschke, J; Rossi, M; Rummo, OO; Samuel, D; Tisone, G; Trunečka, P; Zamboni, F, 2015
)
1.37
"Tacrolimus-treated renal transplant recipients had significantly higher combined endpoint-free survival rates mainly driven by lower acute rejection rates despite less immunosuppressive medication at 7 years."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with ciclosporin-A in renal transplantation: 7-year observational results.
Arias, M; Banas, B; Dietl, KH; Hörsch, S; Krämer, BK; Krüger, B; Kunzendorf, U; Marcen, R; Margreiter, R; Montagnino, G; Mühlbacher, F; Olbricht, CJ; Rigotti, P; Ronco, C; Sester, U, 2016
)
1.47
"In tacrolimus treated subjects the frequency of these phenomena is significantly lower."( Cyclosporine-A, but not tacrolimus significantly increases reactivity of vascular smooth muscle cells.
Grześk, E; Grześk, G; Malinowski, B; Manysiak, S; Odrowąż-Sypniewska, G; Sinjab, TA; Szadujkis-Szadurska, K; Słupski, M; Tejza, B; Wiciński, M, 2016
)
1.26
"Tacrolimus treatment was performed using the tight dose-adjusting strategy."( ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 1236C/T polymorphism significantly affects the therapeutic outcome of tacrolimus in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis.
Endo, K; Hiramoto, K; Kakuta, Y; Kanazawa, Y; Kimura, T; Kinouchi, Y; Kuroha, M; Negoro, K; Onodera, M; Shiga, H; Shimosegawa, T, 2017
)
1.39
"When tacrolimus treatment was initiated at the time the obliterative lesion had already started to develop, it inhibited the progression of OAD significantly."( Tacrolimus treatment effectively inhibits progression of obliterative airway disease even at later stages of disease development.
Hollmén, M; Koskinen, PK; Lemström, KB; Nykänen, AI; Tikkanen, JM, 2008
)
2.24
"Tacrolimus-treated patients had a lower insignificant incidence of hyperlipidemia (P = 0.05), but a significantly higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.04).There was no significant change or difference in blood pressure between groups."( Long-term graft outcome in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy after immunosuppression modifications.
El-Agroudy, AE; El-Baz, M; El-Dahshan, KF; Ghoneim, MA; Ismail, AM; Mahmoud, K; Shokeir, AA, 2009
)
1.07
"Tacrolimus-treated patients had a lower insignificant incidence of hyperlipidemia (P = .05) but a significantly higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (P = .04)."( Immunosuppression modifications and graft outcome in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy.
El-Agroudy, AE; El-Baz, M; El-Dahshan, K; Ghoneim, MA; Ismail, AM; Mahmoud, K; Shokeir, AA, 2008
)
1.07
"Tacrolimus-treated patients had a lower insignificant incidence of hyperlipidemia (P=0.05), but a significantly higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (P=0.04).There was no significant change or difference in blood pressure between groups."( Long-term graft outcome in patients with chronic allograft dysfunction after immunosuppression modifications.
El-Agroudy, AE; El-Baz, M; El-Dahshan, K; Ghoneim, MA; Mahmoud, K; Shokeir, AA, 2008
)
1.07
"Tacrolimus-treated patients had less acute rejection risk at 6 months and 1 year."( Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine microemulsion for heart transplant recipients: a meta-analysis.
Hetzer, R; Ye, F; Ying-Bin, X; Yu-Guo, W, 2009
)
2.52
"Tacrolimus treatment of RA-FLS results in potentiation of GR translocation to the nucleus even in the presence of a low concentration of Dex (10-9M)."( Potentiation of glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated signaling by the immunosuppressant tacrolimus in rheumatoid synoviocytes.
Aiba, Y; Eguchi, K; Ishibashi, H; Koga, T; Komori, A; Maeda, Y; Migita, K; Miyashita, T; Motokawa, S; Nakamura, M; Shindo, H; Torigoshi, T; Uemura, T; Yatsuhashi, H,
)
1.07
"Tacrolimus-treated patients who were UGT1A9 -275T>A and/or -2152C>T carriers displayed a 20% lower MPA area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) (P = 0.012)."( UGT1A9 -275T>A/-2152C>T polymorphisms correlate with low MPA exposure and acute rejection in MMF/tacrolimus-treated kidney transplant patients.
Budde, K; de Fijter, JW; Hartmann, A; Kuypers, D; Le Meur, Y; Mamelok, R; Schmidt, J; van Agteren, M; van der Werf, M; van Gelder, T; van Schaik, RH, 2009
)
1.29
"Tacrolimus-treated patients experienced fewer incidences of acute rejection (MD = -0.14; 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.01; P = .04)."( Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine for adult lung transplant recipients: a meta-analysis.
Fan, Y; Weng, YG; Xiao, YB, 2009
)
2.52
"Tacrolimus treatment restored insulin levels in both experiments."( Antiapoptotic effect of tacrolimus on cytokine-challenged human islets.
Arias-Díaz, J; Cantero, JL; Del Castillo, JM; García-Martín, MC; Giné, E; Vara, E, 2009
)
1.38
"Tacrolimus-treated wildtype mice were less sensitive to colitis and had fewer activated T-cells. "( T-cell regulation of neutrophil infiltrate at the early stages of a murine colitis model.
de Haar, C; Escher, JC; Lambrecht, BN; Lindenbergh-Kortleve, DJ; Nieuwenhuis, EE; Samsom, JN; Simons-Oosterhuis, Y; van Lierop, PP; van Rijt, LS, 2010
)
1.8
"Tacrolimus treatment also ameliorated oxidative stress and DNA damage in the liver of the core gene transgenic mice."( Tacrolimus ameliorates metabolic disturbance and oxidative stress caused by hepatitis C virus core protein: analysis using mouse model and cultured cells.
Fujie, H; Koike, K; Matsuura, Y; Miyamura, T; Miyoshi, H; Moriishi, K; Moriya, K; Shintani, Y; Shinzawa, S; Suzuki, T; Tsutsumi, T; Yotsuyanagi, H, 2009
)
2.52
"Tacrolimus treatment was stopped."( Progressive necrotic encephalopathy following tacrolimus therapy for liver transplantation.
Aridon, P; Conaldi, PG; D'Amelio, M; Di Benedetto, N; Grasso, G; Ragonese, P; Savettieri, G, 2009
)
1.33
"The Tacrolimus-treated group developed a more aggressive tumor and a drug-related nephrotoxic effect."( Action of tacrolimus on Wistar rat kidneys implanted with Walker 256 carcinosarcoma.
Czeczko, NG; Dietz, UA; Inácio, CM; Malafaia, O; Marcondes, CA; Nassif, PA; Ribas Filho, JM, 2010
)
1.32
"In tacrolimus-treated cases, there was a decrease in CD4 and MHC II, with no change in CD8 between the pre- and post-treated areas."( Diphencyprone and topical tacrolimus as two topical immunotherapeutic modalities. Are they effective in the treatment of alopecia areata among Egyptian patients? A study using CD4, CD8 and MHC II as markers.
Hunter, N; Marei, N; Shaker, O, 2011
)
1.18
"In tacrolimus-treated renal transplant recipients with GI burdens, a conversion from MMF to EC-MPS improves GI-related symptoms and HRQoL."( Improved gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life after conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus.
Hwang, HS; Hyoung, BJ; Kim, CD; Kim, JK; Kim, S; Kim, YH; Kim, YL; Kim, YS; Oh, HY; Shin, GT; Yang, CW, 2010
)
1.07
"Tacrolimus treatment diminished TNF-α but not IL-1 expression increase after LPS challenge in hepatic tissue."( Tacrolimus modulates liver and pancreas nitric oxide synthetase and heme-oxygenase isoforms and cytokine production after endotoxemia.
Arias-Díaz, J; Balibrea, JL; Balibrea, JM; Cuesta-Sancho, S; Fernández-Sevilla, E; García-Martín, MC; Olmedilla, Y; Vara, E, 2011
)
2.53
"Tacrolimus treatment of mice for 1 week dose-dependently decreased splenic CD4(+)/FoxP3(+) (regulatory T cells), increased splenic CD4(+)/IL-17(+) (T-helper 17) cells, and caused endothelial dysfunction and hypertension."( FK506 binding protein 12 deficiency in endothelial and hematopoietic cells decreases regulatory T cells and causes hypertension.
Banes-Berceli, AK; Chatterjee, P; Chiasson, VL; Mitchell, BM; Talreja, D; Young, KJ, 2011
)
1.09
"Tacrolimus ointment treatment continued for 12 months."( Treatment of refractory atopic blepharoconjunctivitis with topical tacrolimus 0.03% dermatologic ointment.
Sakarya, R; Sakarya, Y, 2012
)
1.34
"Tacrolimus treatment significantly attenuated TREC content within cultured CD4+CD8- cells from PM/DMpatients (p < 0.05), but total cell counts were not significantly changed."( The effects of FK506 on refractory inflammatory myopathies.
Kaji, R; Kuroda, Y; Mitsui, T; Ueno, S, 2011
)
1.09
"Tacrolimus treatment did not modify neither systolic nor diastolic arterial pressure but increased ET-1 content, ET(A)- and ET(B)-type receptor expression in aorta."( Changes by tacrolimus of the rat aortic proteome: involvement of endothelin-1.
Barrientos, A; López-Farré, AJ; Macaya, C; Marques, M; Modrego, J; Rodríguez, P; Segura, A; Zamorano-León, JJ, 2012
)
1.49
"Tacrolimus treatment increased bone formation markers in RA patients."( Tacrolimus treatment increases bone formation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Ju, JH; Kang, KY; Kim, HY; Park, SH; Song, YW; Yoo, DH, 2013
)
2.55
"Tacrolimus-treated and knockout mice exhibited significantly increased levels of aortic TGF-β receptor activation as evidenced by SMAD2/3 phosphorylation, along with increased collagen and fibronectin expression compared to controls."( Endothelial cell transforming growth factor-β receptor activation causes tacrolimus-induced renal arteriolar hyalinosis.
Chiasson, VL; Jones, KA; Kopriva, SE; Mahajan, A; Mitchell, BM; Young, KJ, 2012
)
1.33
"Tacrolimus-treated black American patients had greater freedom from allograft rejection requiring treatment at 1 year than those treated with cyclosporine (64% vs. "( Ethnic disparity in clinical outcome after heart transplantation is abrogated using tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression.
Mehra, MR; Park, MH; Scott, RL; Uber, PA, 2002
)
1.98
"Tacrolimus treatment is associated with a significantly better cardiovascular risk profile and superior renal function compared with cyclosporin microemulsion treatment, which appears to translate into improved long-term graft survival."( Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin immunosuppression: long-term outcome in renal transplantation.
Jurewicz, WA, 2003
)
2.48
"Tacrolimus treatment was continued (n = 4) or temporarily withheld (n = 7) for 1-14 d."( Tacrolimus-associated posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Beguelin, GZ; Champlin, R; Couriel, D; de Lima, M; Forman, AD; Giralt, SA; Hosing, C; Ippoliti, C; Kumar, AJ; Wong, R, 2003
)
2.48
"Tacrolimus treated cats survived longer (median, 44 days; range, 24 to 52 days) than untreated cats (median, 23 days; range, 8 to 34 days)."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus after multidose oral administration and efficacy in the prevention of allograft rejection in cats with renal transplants.
Craigmill, AL; Gregory, CR; Griffey, SM; Jackson, J; Kyles, AE; Stanley, SD, 2003
)
1.36
"Tacrolimus treats the signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis, reduces the incidence of flares, and offers the potential for long-term disease control."( Atopic dermatitis management with tacrolimus ointment (Protopic).
Allen, BR; Kapp, A; Reitamo, S, 2003
)
1.32
"Tacrolimus-treated patients exhibit significantly faster recovery from tubular phosphate reabsorption impairment compared to cyclosporine-treated recipients."( Tacrolimus decreases tubular phosphate wasting in renal allograft recipients.
Boratynska, M; Falkiewicz, K; Kaminska, D; Klinger, M; Nahaczewska, W; Owczarek, H; Patrzalek, D; Szepietowski, T; Wozniak, M, 2003
)
2.48
"Tacrolimus-treated mature DC had reduced T-cell stimulatory capacity. "( In vitro treatment of dendritic cells with tacrolimus: impaired T-cell activation and IP-10 expression.
Ebner, S; Fritsch, P; Herold, M; Heufler, C; Hofer, S; Ivarsson, L; Mayer, G; Neyer, S; Tiefenthaler, M, 2004
)
2.03
"Tacrolimus treatment reduces the ability of DC to stimulate T cells and the impaired production of DC-derived IP-10 (CXCL10) and IL-12 might play a role in the immunosuppressive action of tacrolimus."( In vitro treatment of dendritic cells with tacrolimus: impaired T-cell activation and IP-10 expression.
Ebner, S; Fritsch, P; Herold, M; Heufler, C; Hofer, S; Ivarsson, L; Mayer, G; Neyer, S; Tiefenthaler, M, 2004
)
2.03
"The tacrolimus-treated patients had a superior outcome regarding neurologic function and progression rate of cerebral hemiatrophy but no better seizure outcome."( An open study of tacrolimus therapy in Rasmussen encephalitis.
Bien, CG; Elger, CE; Gleissner, U; Sassen, R; Urbach, H; Widman, G, 2004
)
1.14
"Tacrolimus treatment was safe and well tolerated."( Efficacy of tacrolimus in the treatment of steroid refractory autoimmune hepatitis.
Aqel, BA; Dickson, RC; Harnois, DM; Machicao, V; Rosser, B; Satyanarayana, R, 2004
)
1.42
"With tacrolimus treatment (0.64 mg/kg per day, 0-13 postoperative days, intramuscularly), recipients' body weights and their survival were evaluated."( Immunologic benefits of longer graft in rat allogenic small bowel transplantation.
Fujishiro, J; Hashizume, K; Inoue, S; Kaneko, M; Kaneko, T; Kobayashi, E; Tahara, K, 2005
)
0.78
"tacrolimus-treated rats, respectively."( Systemic toxicity of tacrolimus given by various routes and the response to dose reduction.
Akar, Y; Arici, G; Durukan, A; Yucel, G; Yucel, I, 2005
)
1.37
"Tacrolimus treatment remained of borderline significance (2.77, P = .05)."( Factors influencing the onset of diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation: a single French center experience.
Bondor, CI; Kessler, M; Marin, M; Renoult, E, 2005
)
1.05
"In tacrolimus-treated animals, median survival was 152+/-65 days with the longest survivor being electively sacrificed on POD 390 (P=0.0064)."( Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine induction therapy in pulmonary transplantation in miniature swine.
Avsar, M; Haverich, A; Niedermeyer, J; Reinhard, R; Simon, AR; Steinkamp, T; Strüber, M; Warnecke, G, 2005
)
2.29
"Tacrolimus-treated patients had significantly lower cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels and also had fewer new-onset infections."( Tacrolimus as secondary intervention vs. cyclosporine continuation in patients at risk for chronic renal allograft failure.
Waid, T, 2005
)
2.49
"Tacrolimus-treated patients were mainly withdrawn from the study due to MMF discontinuation."( Immunosuppressive drugs after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.
Claes, K; Coosemans, W; Evenepoel, P; Kuypers, DR; Maes, B; Malaise, J; Pirenne, J; Squifflet, JP; Van Ophem, D; Vanrenterghem, Y,
)
0.85
"Tacrolimus pretreatment failed to block respiratory reactions to provoking doses of aspirin in 5 of 8 patients with AERD, and in the other 3 patients did not block higher doses of aspirin. "( Failure of tacrolimus to prevent aspirin-induced respiratory reactions in patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease.
Gupta, S; Mehra, PK; Simon, RA; Stevenson, DD; White, AA; Woessner, KM, 2005
)
2.16
"Only tacrolimus-treated recipients showed preserved luminal epithelial coverage with airway goblet cells, whereas, in animals that received FK778, no epithelium was found."( FK778 and tacrolimus prevent the development of obliterative airway disease after heterotopic rat tracheal transplantation.
Böger, R; Detter, C; Deuse, T; Haddad, M; Koch-Nolte, F; Reichenspurner, H; Schäfer, H; Schrepfer, S; Schwedhelm, E, 2005
)
1.19
"Tacrolimus-treated patients exhibit significantly faster recovery from tubular phosphate reabsorption impairment compared with cyclosporine-treated recipients."( Renal function and tubular phosphate handling in long-term cyclosporine- and tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.
Boratyńska, M; Falkiewicz, K; Kamińska, D; Klinger, M; Nahaczewska, W; Owczarek, H; Patrzałek, D; Szyber, P; Woźniak, M,
)
1.08
"tacrolimus treatment. The median duration of therapy with calcium-channel blocker in the tyrosinemia group was 5 (1-13) vs."( Normal glomerular filtration rate in long-term follow-up of children after orthotopic liver transplantation.
Alvarez, F; Herzog, D; Martin, S; Turpin, S, 2006
)
1.06
"Tacrolimus-treated patients experienced more application site skin burning (tacrolimus gel and cream both 31.0% versus 7.5% for calcipotriol; p = 0.011)."( 0.3% Tacrolimus gel and 0.5% Tacrolimus cream show efficacy in mild to moderate plaque psoriasis: Results of a randomized, open-label, observer-blinded study.
Bieber, T; Lahfa, M; Lorette, G; Ortonne, JP; Prinz, JC; Rubins, A; van de Kerkhof, PC; Wozel, G, 2006
)
1.57
"Tacrolimus treatment achieved a significant reduction of CD25+ cells."( The effects of tacrolimus ointment on regulatory T lymphocytes in atopic dermatitis.
Antiga, E; Caproni, M; del Bianco, E; Fabbri, P; Torchia, D; Volpi, W, 2006
)
1.41
"Of tacrolimus-treated patients, 43% displayed hypomagnesemia. "( Tacrolimus-associated hypomagnesemia in renal transplant recipients.
Gross, MD; Jeevanantham, V; Monk, RD; Navaneethan, SD; Sankarasubbaiyan, S, 2006
)
2.4
"Tacrolimus was treated at 0.1-10 ng/ml."( FK506 (tacrolimus) improves lung injury through inhibition of Fas-mediated inflammation.
Hirayama, Y; Koshika, T; Masunaga, T, 2006
)
1.51
"Tacrolimus-treated patients were significantly older than cyclosporine-treated patients (49 +/- 14 vs."( Relative risk of new-onset diabetes during the first year after renal transplantation in patients receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine immunosuppression.
Hilbrands, LB; Hoitsma, AJ,
)
1.07
"Tacrolimus-treated specimens featured a significant reduction of the expression of ELAM-1, VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, while hydrocortisone-treated lesions did not."( Expression of adhesion molecules in atopic dermatitis is reduced by tacrolimus, but not by hydrocortisone butyrate: a randomized immunohistochemical study.
Antiga, E; Caproni, M; Fabbri, P; Torchia, D; Volpi, W, 2006
)
1.29
"Two tacrolimus-treated patients developed perianal abscesses, 1 after improvement in fistula drainage."( Topical tacrolimus in the treatment of perianal Crohn's disease: exploratory randomized controlled trial.
Hart, AL; Kamm, MA; Plamondon, S, 2007
)
1.25
"Tacrolimus treatment reduced proteinuria and increased serum albumin (time effect, P = 0.047 and 0.032 respectively)."( A pilot study on tacrolimus treatment in membranous or quiescent lupus nephritis with proteinuria resistant to angiotensin inhibition or blockade.
Chan, TM; Lam, MF; Tang, CS; Tang, SC; Tse, KC, 2007
)
1.4
"Tacrolimus treatment in periodontitis-induced rats conferred protection against the inflammation-induced tissue and bone loss associated with periodontitis, through a mechanism involving IL-1beta, TNF-alpha and IL-6."( Protective effects of Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor, in experimental periodontitis in rats.
Andia, DC; Guimarães, MR; Nassar, CA; Nassar, PO; Rossa, C; Spolidorio, DM; Spolidorio, LC, 2007
)
1.38
"Tacrolimus-treated patients had significantly greater improvements in the Eczema Area Severity Index score compared with pimecrolimus-treated patients (mean percent reduction from baseline to study end: 57% vs 39%, respectively; p=0.0002). "( Tacrolimus ointment is more effective than pimecrolimus cream in adult patients with moderate to very severe atopic dermatitis.
Abramovits, W; Breneman, D; Fleischer, AB; Jaracz, E, 2007
)
3.23
"Tacrolimus-treated peritoneal macrophages, however, were able to present synthetic OVA peptide, SIINFEKL."( Calcineurin inhibitors block MHC-restricted antigen presentation in vivo.
Gerelchuluun, T; Im, SA; Kim, K; Kim, KH; Lee, CK; Lee, YH; Lee, YR; Park, SI; Song, S, 2007
)
1.06
"Tacrolimus-treated subjects had significantly reduced pocket depth and gingival enlargement measures (Pocket Depths: -0.40 +/- 0.58 vs 0.30 +/- 0.35, P < 0.01; Gingival Enlargement Index: -1.12 +/- 0.83 vs-0.10 +/- 0.89, P < 0.05; tacrolimus vs cyclosporine, respectively), and decreased subjective disfigurement compared with the cyclosporine-treated group over the 12 months."( Conversion of cyclosporine to tacrolimus in stable renal allograft recipients: quantification of effects on the severity of gingival enlargement and hirsutism and patient-reported outcomes.
Butcher, BE; Cottrell, S; Fraser, I; Nicholls, KM; Sharp, K; Tripodi, R; Varigos, GA; Walker, RG, 2007
)
1.35
"In tacrolimus- and CsA-treated patients, but not in patients with GO, the level of TGF-beta1 gene expression was associated with functional phenotypes of TGF-beta1."( Transforming growth factor-beta1 gene expression and cyclosporine A-induced gingival overgrowth: a pilot study.
Boratyńska, M; Dobosz, T; Radwan-Oczko, M; Zietek, M, 2008
)
0.86
"The tacrolimus pretreatment significantly reduced the hamster-specific complement-dependent cytotoxic antibodies response directed to liver NPC but not to lymph node cell targets."( Tacrolimus pretreatment attenuates preexisting xenospecific immunity and abrogates hyperacute rejection in a presensitized hamster to rat liver transplant model.
Celli, S; Demetris, AJ; Fung, JJ; Pan, F; Rao, AS; Starzl, TE; Tsugita, M; Valdivia, LA, 1996
)
2.22
"Tacrolimus-treated patients had an increased intestinal permeability and significantly higher endotoxin levels compared with healthy volunteers."( The effect of tacrolimus (FK506) on intestinal barrier function and cellular energy production in humans.
Barclay, GR; Bjarnason, I; Gabe, SM; Johnson, PG; Silk, DB; Tolou-Ghamari, Z; Tredger, JM; Williams, R, 1998
)
1.38
"In tacrolimus-treated rats, the velocity of rolling leukocytes was significantly faster than in vehicle-treated rats (P<0.01)."( Tacrolimus (FK506) attenuates leukocyte accumulation after transient retinal ischemia.
Hiroshiba, N; Honda, Y; Kiryu, J; Miyamoto, K; Ogura, Y; Tsujikawa, A, 1998
)
2.26
"Tacrolimus treated patients had a mean creatinine of 1.8 +/- 0.8 mg/dl, as compared to 1.6 +/- 0.7 mg/dl in controls."( [Quality of life following transplantation. The impact ofa new immunosuppressive substance].
Franke, G; Heemann, U; Kohnle, M; Lütkes, P; Philipp, T; Witzke, O; Zimmermann, U, 1999
)
1.02
"Tacrolimus-treated patients had a lower incidence of hyperlipidemia through 6 months posttransplant."( Randomized trial of tacrolimus (Prograf) in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) with mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation.
Ahsan, N; Corwin, C; Danovitch, G; Fitzsimmons, WE; Gonwa, T; Halloran, P; Hardy, M; Johnson, C; Light, J; Metzger, R; Mulloy, L; Rocher, L; Salm, K; Scandling, J; Shield, C; Sorensen, J; Stegall, M; Tolzman, D; van Veldhuisen, P; Wachs, M, 2000
)
1.35
"Tacrolimus-treated animals developed significantly less proteinuria and had lower serum creatinine levels than those receiving cyclosporin. "( Tacrolimus has less fibrogenic potential than cyclosporin A in a model of renal ischaemia-reperfusion injury.
Bicknell, GR; Jain, S; Nicholson, ML, 2000
)
3.19
"Tacrolimus ointment-treated patients showed significantly greater improvement than vehicle-treated patients for all efficacy parameters evaluated, including the %BSA affected, the total score and individual scores for signs of atopic dermatitis, the patient's assessment of pruritus, and EASI score."( Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adult patients: part I, efficacy.
Breneman, D; Hanifin, JM; Langley, R; Ling, MR; Rafal, E, 2001
)
2.47
"Tacrolimus treatment ameliorated the histopathological features and prevented the decrease in villin protein expression."( Expression of peptide transporter following intestinal transplantation in the rat.
Inui, KI; Katsura, T; Masuda, S; Motohashi, H; Saito, H; Sakamoto, S; Tanaka, K; Uemoto, S, 2001
)
1.03
"Tacrolimus treatment added with donor specific BMT down-regulated IL-12 and IFN-gamma transcript, resulted in a significant prolongation of intestinal allograft survival."( Impact of tacrolimus and bone marrow augmentation on intestinal allograft survival and intragraft cytokine expression in rats.
Kobayashi, E; Nakao, A; Shen, SD; Tanaka, N; Yoshino, T, 2001
)
1.43
"Tacrolimus-treated patients appear to have less hyperlipidemic and have LDL less susceptible to oxidation than patients treated with CsA."( Tacrolimus, cyclosporine and plasma lipoproteins in renal transplant recipients.
Neylan, JF; Santanam, N; Sgoutas, DS; Venkiteswaran, K, 2001
)
2.47
"Treatment with tacrolimus was switched to everolimus (EVO), but EVO was discontinued because of pneumonitis."( Successful Treatment of Conjunctival Kaposi Sarcoma in a Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Negative Kidney Transplant Recipient: A Case Report.
Gunay, E; Oncul, H, 2020
)
0.9
"Treatment with tacrolimus ointment was started as the patient had an elevated intraocular pressure due to prolonged steroid use."( Ointment tacrolimus for steroid resistant adenoviral nummular keratitis.
Jamaluddin Ahmad, M; Khaliddin, N; Lott, PW; Singh, S, 2020
)
1.31
"Treatment with tacrolimus was superior to sodium cromoglycate when comparing severity scores for symptoms of itching, foreign body sensation, and photophobia, as well as for signs of limbal inflammatory activity and keratitis."( Tacrolimus eye drops as monotherapy for vernal keratoconjunctivitis: a randomized controlled trial.
Belfort, R; Freitas, D; Gomes, JÁP; Müller, EG; Santos, MSD, 2017
)
2.25
"Treatment with tacrolimus was an independent risk factor associated with increased risk for rPSC (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.15-2.86, p = 0.010)."( Risk factors and prognosis for recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis after liver transplantation: a Nordic Multicentre Study.
Bergquist, A; Boberg, KM; Bottai, M; Castedal, M; Isoniemi, H; Jørgensen, KK; Lindström, L; Rasmussen, A; Rostved, AA, 2018
)
0.82
"Treatment of tacrolimus toxicity includes holding tacrolimus and supportive care. "( Treatment of prolonged tacrolimus toxicity using phenytoin in a haemodialysis patient.
Hamid, M; McGowan, M; Meaney, CJ; O'Connor, M; Su, W, 2019
)
1.19
"Treatment of tacrolimus significantly ameliorated the TNF-mediated axonal loss."( Axonal Protection by Tacrolimus with Inhibition of NFATc1 in TNF-Induced Optic Nerve Degeneration.
Fujita, N; Kitaoka, Y; Sase, K; Takagi, H; Tsukahara, C, 2019
)
1.19
"Treatment with tacrolimus was continued for 18.1 ± 13.9 months. "( Efficacy and safety of systemic tacrolimus in high-risk penetrating keratoplasty after graft failure with systemic cyclosporine.
Omoto, M; Shimazaki, J; Yamaguchi, T; Yamazoe, K, 2014
)
1.04
"When treated with tacrolimus, however, BP and the renal abundance of phosphorylated NCC were lower in mice lacking FKBP12 along the nephron than in control mice."( Renal Deletion of 12 kDa FK506-Binding Protein Attenuates Tacrolimus-Induced Hypertension.
Bachmann, S; Blankenstein, KI; Bleich, M; Ellison, DH; Himmerkus, N; Lazelle, RA; McCully, BH; Mutig, K; Terker, AS; Yang, CL, 2016
)
1
"Treatment with tacrolimus from 0.001 to 1 µg/ml led to an increase in mineralization compared with the control group."( Effects of tacrolimus on morphology, proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from gingiva tissue.
Ha, DH; Jeong, JH; Kim, JO; Park, JB; Yong, CS, 2016
)
1.16
"Treatment with tacrolimus and mTORi is the most diabetogenic immunosuppressive regimen. "( Risk Factors of Recurrence of Diabetic Nephropathy in Renal Transplants.
Bautista, J; Calvo, M; Calvo, N; de la Manzanara, V; Delgado, J; Moreno, A; Perez-Flores, I; Rodriguez Cubillo, B; Rodriguez, B; Sanchez-Fructuoso, AI; Shabaka, A, 2016
)
0.79
"Treatment with tacrolimus monotherapy during 60 days may induce increases in alveolar bone volume (BV/TV,%; P<0.05) and a non-significant decrease in trabecular separation (Tb.Sp,mm; P>0.05), represented by a decrease in osteoclast number (N.Oc/BS; P<0.05) and maintenance of osteoblast number (N.Ob/BS; P>0.05)."( Treatment with tacrolimus enhances alveolar bone formation and decreases osteoclast number in the maxillae: a histomorphometric and ultrastructural study in rats.
Andia, DC; Cerri, PS; Guimarães, MR; Nassar, CA; Nassar, PO; Spolidorio, LC, 2008
)
1.04
"Treatment with tacrolimus was started orally or intravenously and aimed for serum trough levels of 10-15 ng/ml."( The effect of tacrolimus (FK-506) on Japanese patients with refractory Crohn's disease.
Chiba, T; Inoue, S; Kasahara, K; Kitamura, H; Matsuura, M; Mikami, S; Nakase, H; Tamaki, H; Ueno, S; Uza, N, 2008
)
1.05
"Treatment with tacrolimus before the final challenge completely inhibited the recovery of substance P content, whereas dexamethasone facilitated the recovery."( Depletion of substance P, a mechanism for inhibition of mouse scratching behavior by tacrolimus.
Chikumoto, T; Igeta, K; Inagaki, N; Itoh, T; Katoh, H; Kim, JF; Nagai, H; Nagao, M; Shiraishi, N; Tanaka, H, 2010
)
0.92
"Pretreatment with tacrolimus also produced significant (p<0.05) reduction in TBARS, total calcium, TNF-alpha, IL-8 and MPO whereas it showed an increase in GSH level at higher dose."( Activity of tacrolimus: an immunosuppressant, in pyloric ligation-induced peptic ulcer in the rat.
Muthuraman, A; Sood, S, 2009
)
1.06
"Treatment with tacrolimus was performed in groups TT and TC."( Action of tacrolimus on Wistar rat kidneys implanted with Walker 256 carcinosarcoma.
Czeczko, NG; Dietz, UA; Inácio, CM; Malafaia, O; Marcondes, CA; Nassif, PA; Ribas Filho, JM, 2010
)
1.1
"Treatment with tacrolimus, alone or in combination with topical corticosteroids for acute flares, may be a useful option for long-term management of AD in pediatric patients."( The safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis.
Eichenfield, LF; McCollum, AD; Paik, A,
)
0.77
"Treatment with tacrolimus was successful in preventing disease relapses."( Neuromyelitis optica-IgG+ optic neuritis associated with celiac disease and dysgammaglobulinemia: a role for tacrolimus?
Bossuyt, X; Buyse, G; Jansen, K; Lagae, L; Meyts, I; Régal, L; Renard, M; Roelens, F, 2011
)
0.92
"Treatment with tacrolimus 0.1 percent ointment was prescribed with a very good response after two months."( Annular erythematous papules in the neckline.
Aneiros-Cachaza, J; Aneiros-Fernández, J; Arias-Santiago, S; Espiñeira-Carmona, MJ; Fernández-Pugnaire, MA; Naranjo-Sintes, R, 2011
)
0.71
"Treatment with tacrolimus (FK-506) has been shown to induce a significant decrease in the number of spermatocytes, spermatids, and Sertoli cells. "( Immunosuppressant prograf® (tacrolimus) induces histopathological disorders in the peritubular tissue of rat testes.
Caneguim, BH; Cerri, PS; Miraglia, SM; Sasso-Cerri, E; Spolidório, LC, 2011
)
1.02
"Pre-treatment with tacrolimus markedly protected RGC-5 cells from NMDA-induced neurotoxicity, and then both spontaneous RGC death and degenerative changes to the optic nerve in p50-deficient mice were significantly reduced by the chronic administration of tacrolimus."( Development of spontaneous neuropathy in NF-κBp50-deficient mice by calcineurin-signal involving impaired NF-κB activation.
Hayashi, T; Murata, T; Nakamura-Yanagidaira, T; Sano, K; Takahashi, Y, 2011
)
0.69
"Treatment with tacrolimus resulted in a dose-dependent increase in the invasive potential of HCC cells in vitro, in the density of peritumoral lymphatic vessels, and in the number and volume of metastatic lymph nodes in August Copenhagen Irish (ACI) rats."( Tacrolimus enhances the invasion potential of hepatocellular carcinoma cells and promotes lymphatic metastasis in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma: involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor-C.
Dai, Z; Fan, J; Fu, X; Tan, C; Wang, W; Xu, M; Zhao, Y; Zhou, J; Zhou, S; Zhou, Z; Zhu, H, 2011
)
2.15
"Treatment with Tacrolimus induced an increase in serum amylase in normal mice, but did not affect blood glucose or the histological pattern of the pancreatic parenchyma. "( Action of tacrolimus in arginine induced experimental acute pancreatitis.
Caron, PE; Matias, JE; Moreira, M; Nicoluzzi, JE; Repka, JC; Souza, CJ,
)
0.89
"Treatment with tacrolimus for 14 d reduced the colon weight per unit length and suppressed the release of IFN-γ and IL-1β, but not other cytokines, in inflamed colons of colitic mice compared with vehicle-treated mice."( Tacrolimus ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice: implication of interferon-γ and interleukin-1β suppression.
Koshiba, M; Maeda, N; Miyata, K; Okada, Y; Takakura, S, 2011
)
2.15
"Treatment with tacrolimus (FK506) showed a dose dependant inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia in arterialised vein grafts in rats (Tab. "( Tacrolimus inhibits intimal hyperplasia in arterialised veins in rats.
Adamec, M; Lodererova, A; Matia, I; Varga, M, 2012
)
2.17
"Treatment with tacrolimus or IVIG may slow down tissue and function loss and prevent development of intractable epilepsy."( Rasmussen encephalitis: incidence and course under randomized therapy with tacrolimus or intravenous immunoglobulins.
Bast, T; Becker, AJ; Bien, CG; Elger, CE; Herkenrath, P; Karenfort, M; Kruse, B; Kuczaty, S; Kurlemann, G; Rona, S; Sassen, R; Schubert-Bast, S; Tiemeier, H; Urbach, H; Vieker, S; Vlaho, S; von Lehe, M; Wilken, B, 2013
)
0.96
"Treatment of tacrolimus with weak base (1,5-diazabicyclo[4.3.0]nonene) gives, in addition to 8-epitacrolimus, the open-chain acid corresponding to 5-deoxy-Δ(5,6)-tacrolimus, a rare non-cyclic derivative of tacrolimus."( Some transformations of tacrolimus, an immunosuppressive drug.
Frydenvang, K; Hansen, L; Hansen, SH; Jaroszewski, JW; Johansen, KT; Nielsen, PG; Skytte, DM, 2013
)
1.05
"Treatment with tacrolimus ointment (0.03% or 0.1%) does not increase the risk of cutaneous bacterial, viral, or fungal infections in patients with atopic dermatitis."( Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis is not associated with an increase in cutaneous infections.
Eichenfield, L; Fleischer, AB; Jaracz, E; Ling, M; Maher, RM; Rico, MJ; Satoi, Y, 2002
)
2.11
"Treatment with tacrolimus resulted in a dose-dependent increase in the number of pulmonary metastases in the BALB/c mice (197+/-16 in untreated mice, 281+/-26 in mice treated with 2 mg/kg of tacrolimus, and 339+/-25 in mice treated with 4 mg/kg of tacrolimus; no treatment vs. "( Tacrolimus enhances transforming growth factor-beta1 expression and promotes tumor progression.
Lagman, M; Li, B; Maluccio, M; Sharma, V; Suthanthiran, M; Vyas, S; Yang, H, 2003
)
2.11
"Treatment with tacrolimus ointment completely resolved the oral lesions after 2 months of therapy."( Successful treatment of oral lichen planus-like chronic graft-versus-host disease with topical tacrolimus: a case report.
Rogers, RS; Sánchez, AR; Sheridan, PJ, 2004
)
0.88
"Treatment with tacrolimus ointment 0.1% resulted in the rapid improvement of each recurred lesion and allowed withdrawal of indomethacin."( Treatment of eosinophilic pustular folliculitis with tacrolimus ointment.
Hara, D; Kuroda, K; Mieno, H; Tajima, S, 2004
)
0.91
"Pretreatment with tacrolimus ointment did not suppress nonlesional skin infiltrate, in contrast to triamcinolone acetonide. "( Modulation of the atopy patch test: tacrolimus 0.1% compared with triamcinolone acetonide 0.1%.
Bruijnzeel-Koomen, CA; de Bruin-Weller, MS; Knol, EF; Laaper-Ertmann, M; Oldhoff, JM, 2006
)
0.94
"Pretreatment with tacrolimus 0.1% ointment does not inhibit the APT reaction in patients with atopic dermatitis."( Modulation of the atopy patch test: tacrolimus 0.1% compared with triamcinolone acetonide 0.1%.
Bruijnzeel-Koomen, CA; de Bruin-Weller, MS; Knol, EF; Laaper-Ertmann, M; Oldhoff, JM, 2006
)
0.94
"Treatment with tacrolimus ointment did not increase the ceramide fractions toward or to normal."( A study to determine the effect of tacrolimus on ceramide levels in the stratum corneum of patients with atopic dermatitis.
Paslin, D; Wertz, P, 2006
)
0.96
"Treatment with tacrolimus ointment in patients with moderate and severe AD can therefore be considered cost-effective."( Cost-effectiveness of tacrolimus ointment vs. standard treatment in patients with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis: a health-economic model simulation based on a patient survey and clinical trial data.
Hjelmgren, J; Jörgensen, ET; Lindemalm-Lundstam, B; Ragnarson Tennvall, G; Svensson, A, 2007
)
0.99
"Treatment by tacrolimus and cyclosporin A, two inhibitors of calcineurin (but not by a related substance rapamycin, which does not inhibit calcineurin), increased the levels of AChE transcripts in the control soleus muscles and in tonically electrically stimulated soleus and EDL muscles, even to reach those in the control EDL muscles."( The role of muscle activation pattern and calcineurin in acetylcholinesterase regulation in rat skeletal muscles.
Pregelj, P; Sketelj, J; Trinkaus, M; Trontelj, JJ; Zupan, D, 2007
)
0.69
"Rats treated with tacrolimus, although still impaired, performed significantly better than those treated with vehicle alone (P < .01)."( Tacrolimus (FK506) ameliorates skilled motor deficits produced by middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats.
Butcher, SP; Crawford, JH; Marston, HM; Sharkey, J, 1996
)
2.06
"Treatment with tacrolimus suppressed leukocyte rolling; the maximum number of rolling leukocytes was reduced by 60.1% at 12 hours after reperfusion (P<0.05). "( Tacrolimus (FK506) attenuates leukocyte accumulation after transient retinal ischemia.
Hiroshiba, N; Honda, Y; Kiryu, J; Miyamoto, K; Ogura, Y; Tsujikawa, A, 1998
)
2.1
"Treatment with tacrolimus was associated with a reduction in episodes of acute rejection (0.52; 0.36 to 0.75), a reduction in the use of antilymphocyte antibodies to treat rejection (0.37; 0.25 to 0."( Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin for immunosuppression in renal transplantation: meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Bell, RC; Knoll, GA, 1999
)
2.09

Toxicity

Study was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects at different tacrolimus trough levels and dosages. Risk of graft failure, death, and adverse events in the first year was similar for the once-daily and twice-daily groups.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" At present, it is unclear whether these immunosuppressive and toxic effects result from interference with related biochemical processes."( The immunosuppressive and toxic effects of FK-506 are mechanistically related: pharmacology of a novel antagonist of FK-506 and rapamycin.
Beattie, TR; Dumont, FJ; Harrison, R; Kindt, VM; Koprak, SL; Lin, CS; Sewell, T; Siekierka, JJ; Staruch, MJ; Wyvratt, M, 1992
)
0.28
" Lessons are still being learned about dosage and what determines safe dose schedules."( Selected topics on FK 506, with special references to rescue of extrahepatic whole organ grafts, transplantation of "forbidden organs," side effects, mechanisms, and practical pharmacokinetics.
Abu-Elmagd, K; Fung, JJ; Porter, KA; Starzl, TE; Todo, S; Tzakis, A, 1991
)
0.28
" It is suggested that this model may help to clarify the mechanism of action of cyclosporin as an immunosuppressant and its toxic effects on the liver and kidney following prolonged therapy."( Further evidence that cyclosporin A protects mitochondria from calcium overload by inhibiting a matrix peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase. Implications for the immunosuppressive and toxic effects of cyclosporin.
Griffiths, EJ; Halestrap, AP, 1991
)
0.28
"The toxic effects of FK-506 (FK), a newly discovered immunosuppressive agent isolated from Streptomyces tsukubaensis, were studied in the human fetal pancreas (HFP) system."( Toxicity of FK-506 in human fetal pancreas.
Hullett, DA; Landry, AS; Leonard, DK; Sollinger, HW, 1989
)
0.28
"The immunosuppressive and toxic properties of the recently discovered macrolide antibiotic FK506 were examined in comparison and in conjunction with cyclosporine administration in the rat."( Immunosuppressive activity, lymphocyte subset analysis, and acute toxicity of FK-506 in the rat. A comparative and combination study with cyclosporine.
Hasan, NU; Stephen, M; Thomson, AW; Whiting, PH; Woo, J, 1989
)
0.28
" In summary, full response to FK506 conversion was observed in 69% of uncontrollable AR cases; however, 74% and 22% of this probably over-immunosuppressed population experienced major adverse events and LPS under FK506 therapy, respectively."( Conversion from cyclosporine to FK506 for salvage of immunocompromised pediatric liver allografts. Efficacy, toxicity, and dose regimen in 23 children.
Barker, A; De Ville de Goyet, J; Debande, B; Jamart, J; Lamy, ME; Rahier, J; Reding, R; Sempoux, C; Sokal, E; Wallemacq, PE, 1994
)
0.29
" However, the lack of a suitable animal model has hindered the study of FK nephrotoxicity, which has been noted as a common adverse effect in human trials."( Enhancement of FK506 nephrotoxicity by sodium depletion in an experimental rat model.
Andoh, TF; Bennett, WM; Burdmann, EA; Houghton, DC; Lindsley, J, 1994
)
0.29
" The present study was undertaken to examine whether the toxic effects of tacrolimus show administration time-dependent variations."( Administration time-dependent toxicity of a new immunosuppressive agent, tacrolimus (FK 506).
Ebihara, A; Fujimura, A, 1994
)
0.75
" However, various blood and serum parameters, including ALT, bilirubin, urea, creatinine and glucose, when analyzed alone or in multivariate fashion, also correlated significantly with the incidence and severity of early postoperative neurotoxicity, indicating that neurotoxicity following LTX may be caused by various factors and is not exclusively a drug-specific side effect of immunosuppression."( Neurotoxicity after orthotopic liver transplantation. A comparison between cyclosporine and FK506.
Bechstein, WO; Blumhardt, G; Christe, W; Mueller, AR; Neuhaus, P; Platz, KP; Schattenfroh, N; Stoltenburg-Didinger, G, 1994
)
0.29
"Nephrotoxicity represents a serious side effect of immunosuppression following liver transplantation."( Nephrotoxicity following orthotopic liver transplantation. A comparison between cyclosporine and FK506.
Bachmann, S; Bechstein, WO; Blumhardt, G; Kahl, A; Mueller, AR; Neuhaus, P; Platz, KP, 1994
)
0.29
" These data suggest that FK506 is reversibly and mildly toxic to monolayers of human renal proximal tubule cells and are consistent with clinical reports of reversible nephrotoxicity."( Cytotoxic effects of FK506 on human renal proximal tubule cells in culture.
Atcherson, MM; Trifillis, AL, 1994
)
0.29
" Thus, it is hypothesized that both the immunosuppressive and toxic effects of FK506 and CsA, but not of rapamycin, are mediated through an immunophilin-drug-calcineurin complex."( Nephrotoxicity of immunosuppressants in rats: comparison of macrolides with cyclosporin.
Mihatsch, MJ; Ryffel, B; Weber, E,
)
0.13
"Recent studies in liver and kidney transplant recipients revealed a nephrotoxic adverse effect of the new macrolide immunosuppressant FK-506."( Nephrotoxicity of FK-506 in the rat. Studies on glomerular and tubular function, and on the relationship between efficacy and toxicity.
Dieperink, H; Kemp, E; Leyssac, PP; Nielsen, FT; Starklint, H, 1995
)
0.29
" The lack of a suitable animal model has hindered the study of the nephrotoxicity of the drug which has emerged as a common adverse effect in clinical trials."( Functional and structural characteristics of experimental FK 506 nephrotoxicity.
Andoh, TF; Bennett, WM; Burdmann, EA; Houghton, DC; Lindsley, J, 1995
)
0.29
"Increasing clinical experience of FK 506 in transplantation therapy has revealed a number of potentially restrictive adverse effects associated with its use."( Pancreatic and nephrotoxicity of immunomodulator compounds.
Hammond, TG; Kind, CN, 1995
)
0.29
" Despite these successes, major improvements in immunosuppressive therapy are needed, especially a reduction in toxic side effects and a rigorous definition of the relation between drug concentration and clinical effects."( Toxic effects of immunosuppressive drugs: mechanisms and strategies for controlling them.
Kaplan, B; Kaufman, D; Shaw, LM, 1996
)
0.29
"In our experience, anemia, renal toxicity, hyperkalemia, chronic diarrhea, and allergies were the most common adverse effects of FK506."( Experience of FK506 immune suppression in pediatric heart transplantation: a study of long-term adverse effects.
Asante-Korang, A; Boyle, GJ; Fricker, FJ; Miller, SA; Webber, SA, 1996
)
0.29
" The toxic potential of tacrolimus was markedly enhanced by ischemia."( Diltiazem minimizes tubular damage due to FK506-mediated nephrotoxicity following ischemia and reperfusion in rats.
Baltes, A; Becker, G; Hamar, P; Heemann, U; Philipp, T; Witzke, O, 1996
)
0.6
"FK506 (tacrolimus) is a safe and effective immunosuppressant for the prevention of organ rejection after organ transplantation."( Relationship of FK506 whole blood concentrations and efficacy and toxicity after liver and kidney transplantation.
Fitzsimmons, WE; Kershner, RP, 1996
)
0.75
"FK506 (tacrolimus) has been shown to be a safe and effective immunosuppressant for the prevention of organ rejection after liver and kidney transplantation."( Relationship of whole-blood FK506 concentrations to rejection and toxicity in liver and kidney transplants.
Hedayat, S; Kershner, RP; Su, G, 1996
)
0.75
" FK506 metabolites exhibit greater toxicity than the parent drug, while CsA metabolites are far less toxic than CsA itself."( Implication of CYP 3A in the toxicity of cyclosporin G (CsG), cyclosporin A (CsA) and FK506 on rat hepatocytes in primary culture.
Claude, JR; Duc, HT; Dutertre-Catella, H; Ellouk-Achard, S; Martin, C; Pham-Huy, C; Thevenin, M; Warnet, JM, 1997
)
0.3
" Nephrotoxicity is the main adverse effect of both compounds."( Modulation of energy status and cytotoxicity induced by FK506 and cyclosporin A in a renal epithelial cell line.
Claude, JR; Dutertre-Catella, H; Ellouk-Achard, S; Martin, C; Massicot, F; Pham-Huy, C; Rucay, P; Thevenin, M; Warnet, JM, 1997
)
0.3
"We recently reported partially to wholly reversible hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, including severe hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, as a side effect in pediatric transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus immunosuppression."( Arteritis and increased intracellular calcium as a possible mechanism for tacrolimus-related cardiac toxicity in a pediatric transplant recipient.
Armstrong, R; Asfar, S; Atkison, PR; Grant, D; Guiraudon, C; Joubert, GI; Wall, W, 1997
)
0.72
" The clinical usefulness of tacrolimus is limited, however, by severe adverse effects, including neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity."( A tacrolimus-related immunosuppressant with reduced toxicity.
Barker, J; DaSilva, C; Dumont, FJ; Koo, G; Koprak, S; Parsons, WH; Pivnichny, J; Sigal, NH; Sinclair, PJ; Singer, I; Staruch, MJ; Talento, A; Williamson, AR; Wong, F; Woods, J; Wyvratt, M, 1998
)
1.32
" The aim of this study was to compare the toxic effects of the two drugs on hepatocytes in primary culture as a function of their metabolism and to explore the variations of cytotoxicity when both drugs are associated."( FK506 (Tacrolimus) decreases the cytotoxicity of cyclosporin A in rat hepatocytes in primary culture: implication of CYP3A induction.
Claude, JR; Duc, HT; Dutertre-Catella, H; Ellouk-Achard, S; Martin, C; Thevenin, M; Warnet, JM, 1998
)
0.76
" The most important adverse events were hypertension (45."( Efficacy and safety of oral low-dose tacrolimus treatment in liver transplantation.
Andreu, H; Calleja, JL; Cuervas-Mons, V; Edo, A; Gonzalez-Pinto, I; Margarit, C; Moreno-Gonzalez, E; Rimola, A, 1998
)
0.57
" For these women pregnancy generally proceeds without significant adverse effects on mother and child."( Drug safety issues in pregnancy following transplantation and immunosuppression: effects and outcomes.
Armenti, VT; Davison, JM; Moritz, MJ, 1998
)
0.3
" Patient survival, graft survival, rate of rejection, and adverse events were examined."( Primary adult liver transplantation under tacrolimus: more than 90 months actual follow-up survival and adverse events.
Fung, JJ; Jain, AB; Kashyap, R; Rakela, J; Starzl, TE, 1999
)
0.57
"Renal toxicity is a serious side effect of therapy with tacrolimus (FK506), an immunosuppressive agent administered to renal transplant recipients."( Effect of hepatocyte growth factor on tacrolimus-induced nephrotoxicity in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Hongsi, J; Ichimaru, N; Kitamura, M; Kokado, Y; Matsumiya, K; Matsumoto, K; Nakamura, T; Nishimura, K; Okuyama, A; Takada, S; Takahara, S, 1999
)
0.82
" Monitoring of tacrolimus levels, which had been in the desired range (5-8 ng/ml) until recently, revealed an increase to toxic level of 54 ng/ml."( Tacrolimus toxicity due to drug interaction with mibefradil in a patient after liver transplantation.
Lochs, H; Mai, I; Ocran, KW; Plauth, M, 1999
)
2.1
"The calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporin A (CsA) and tacrolimus (FK506) are associated with dose- and efficacy-limiting adverse events, including nephrotoxicity, which may diminish their overall benefits for long-term graft survival."( Nephrotoxicity of immunosuppressive drugs: long-term consequences and challenges for the future.
Bennett, WM; de Mattos, AM; Olyaei, AJ, 2000
)
0.56
"8%), adverse effects persisted."( Treatment of tacrolimus-related adverse effects by conversion to cyclosporine in liver transplant recipients.
Emre, S; Fishbein, TM; Genyk, Y; Guy, SR; Miller, CM; Schluger, LK; Schwartz, ME; Sheiner, PA, 2000
)
0.68
" The mean peak of the whole blood TAC trough level during the toxic episodes was 32."( Clinical and histological analysis of acute tacrolimus (TAC) nephrotoxicity in renal allografts.
Ishikawa, N; Oshima, T; Shimizu, T; Shinmura, H; Tanabe, K; Tokumoto, T; Toma, H; Yamaguchi, Y, 1999
)
0.56
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is a safe and effective treatment for the prevention of rejection of renal allografts."( Safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in cadaveric renal transplant recipients. FK506/MMF Dose-Ranging Kidney Transplant Study Group.
Jensik, SC; Mendez, R; Miller, J; Pirsch, JD, 2000
)
2.06
" Patients were followed for 1 yr posttransplant for the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, patient and graft survival, and adverse events."( Safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in cadaveric renal transplant recipients. FK506/MMF Dose-Ranging Kidney Transplant Study Group.
Jensik, SC; Mendez, R; Miller, J; Pirsch, JD, 2000
)
0.62
" The incidence of most adverse events was similar across treatment groups and comparable with previous reports."( Safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in cadaveric renal transplant recipients. FK506/MMF Dose-Ranging Kidney Transplant Study Group.
Jensik, SC; Mendez, R; Miller, J; Pirsch, JD, 2000
)
0.62
"Tacrolimus in combination with an initial dose of MMF 2 g/day is a very effective and safe regimen in cadaveric kidney transplant recipients."( Safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in cadaveric renal transplant recipients. FK506/MMF Dose-Ranging Kidney Transplant Study Group.
Jensik, SC; Mendez, R; Miller, J; Pirsch, JD, 2000
)
2.06
"Although conversion between tacrolimus and cyclosporine has been performed when indicated for rejection or adverse effects, the safety and metabolic outcome of elective conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine has not previously been examined."( Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine in stable renal transplant patients: safety, metabolic changes, and pharmacokinetic comparison.
Hart, P; Higgins, RM; Kashi, H; Lam, FT, 2000
)
0.95
"Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporin has not previously been reported as routine clinical practice, but only as indicated by rejection or adverse effects."( Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporin in stable renal transplant patients: safety, metabolic changes, and pharmacokinetic comparison.
Hart, P; Higgins, RM; Kashi, H; Lam, FT, 2000
)
1
"Safety assessments included monitoring of adverse events, clinical laboratory values, and tacrolimus blood concentrations."( Safety and efficacy of 1 year of tacrolimus ointment monotherapy in adults with atopic dermatitis. The European Tacrolimus Ointment Study Group.
Christophers, E; Jablonska, S; Kapp, A; Lahfa, M; Marks, R; Perrot, JL; Reitamo, S; Rubins, A; Rustin, M; Ruzicka, T; Schöpf, E; Wollenberg, A, 2000
)
0.81
"Local irritation, adverse events such as burning sensation (47% of patients), pruritus (24% of patients), and erythema (12% of patients) were common but tended to occur only when initiating treatment."( Safety and efficacy of 1 year of tacrolimus ointment monotherapy in adults with atopic dermatitis. The European Tacrolimus Ointment Study Group.
Christophers, E; Jablonska, S; Kapp, A; Lahfa, M; Marks, R; Perrot, JL; Reitamo, S; Rubins, A; Rustin, M; Ruzicka, T; Schöpf, E; Wollenberg, A, 2000
)
0.59
"Up to 1 year of tacrolimus ointment use was safe and effective in patients with atopic dermatitis."( Safety and efficacy of 1 year of tacrolimus ointment monotherapy in adults with atopic dermatitis. The European Tacrolimus Ointment Study Group.
Christophers, E; Jablonska, S; Kapp, A; Lahfa, M; Marks, R; Perrot, JL; Reitamo, S; Rubins, A; Rustin, M; Ruzicka, T; Schöpf, E; Wollenberg, A, 2000
)
0.93
"The induction of diabetes has been recognised as adverse effect of the immunsuppressive drug FK506/Tacrolimus."( Diabetes mellitus and islet cell specific autoimmunity as adverse effects of immunsuppressive therapy by FK506/tacrolimus.
Hauss, J; Kohlhaw, K; Lamesch, P; List, C; Lohmann, T; Richter, O; Schwarz, C; Seissler, J; Wenzke, M, 2000
)
0.74
"Between 10%-28% of patients who receive the immunosuppressant cyclosporine (CsA) experience some form of neurotoxic adverse event."( Neurotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors: impact and clinical management.
Bechstein, WO, 2000
)
0.31
" Despite the very strong activity of these medications and common adverse effects, the literature on the subject infrequently associates these phenomena with the possibility of interaction with other drugs or factors causing changes in cyclosporin A, tacrolimus or their metabolites levels in the blood, or else with changes in other pharmacokinetic parameters."( [Adverse effects of drug interactions of cyclosporin A and tacrolimus therapy].
Nowak, JL, 2000
)
0.73
" The most common adverse events were the sensation of skin burning, pruritus, flu-like symptoms, skin erythema, and headache."( Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adult patients: part II, safety.
Fleischer, AB; Lawrence, I; Monroe, E; Soter, NA; Webster, GF, 2001
)
1.75
" Transient skin burning and itching were the most common drug application site adverse events."( Long-term safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children.
Hanifin, JM; Kang, S; Lawrence, I; Lucky, AW; Pariser, D, 2001
)
0.59
" Efficacy and safety parameters analyzed were patient and graft survival, incidence and severity of rejection, and adverse events in correlation to immunosuppressive drug levels."( A novel management strategy of steroid-free immunosuppression after liver transplantation: efficacy and safety of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil.
Braun, F; Canelo, R; Füzesi, L; Lorf, T; Oellerich, M; Ramadori, G; Ringe, B; Schütz, E, 2001
)
0.52
" Double drug immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil is effective and safe in terms of patient and graft survival as well as incidence and severity of rejection."( A novel management strategy of steroid-free immunosuppression after liver transplantation: efficacy and safety of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil.
Braun, F; Canelo, R; Füzesi, L; Lorf, T; Oellerich, M; Ramadori, G; Ringe, B; Schütz, E, 2001
)
0.8
" The principal adverse reactions to FK 506 therapy were hyperglycaemia, renal dysfunction and hyperkalaemia."( Two-year follow-up study of the efficacy and safety of FK 506 in kidney transplant patients. Japanese FK 506 Study Group.
, 1994
)
0.29
"Nephrotoxicity represents a serious side-effect of immunosuppression following orthotopic liver transplantation."( Nephrotoxicity after orthotopic liver transplantation in cyclosporin A and FK 506-treated patients.
Bachmann, S; Bechstein, WO; Blumhardt, G; Kahl, A; Mueller, AR; Neuhaus, P; Platz, KP, 1994
)
0.29
" Pravastatin, a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, has been shown to be effective and safe for cholesterol reduction in adult heart transplant recipients."( Safety and efficacy of pravastatin therapy for the prevention of hyperlipidemia in pediatric and adolescent cardiac transplant recipients.
Fricker, FJ; Harker, K; Kahler, DA; Penson, MG; Schowengerdt, KO; Thompson, JR; Williams, BJ, 2001
)
0.31
"Pravastatin therapy is effective and safe when used in pediatric and adolescent cardiac transplant recipients."( Safety and efficacy of pravastatin therapy for the prevention of hyperlipidemia in pediatric and adolescent cardiac transplant recipients.
Fricker, FJ; Harker, K; Kahler, DA; Penson, MG; Schowengerdt, KO; Thompson, JR; Williams, BJ, 2001
)
0.31
"5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 h after MMF oral dose) were obtained within the first 2 weeks after transplantation, 3 months after grafting, and at every adverse clinical event [side effect or acute rejection (AR)]."( Pharmacokinetic basis for the efficient and safe use of low-dose mycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus in kidney transplantation.
Chaib Eddour, D; De Meyer, M; König, J; Malaise, J; Mourad, M; Schepers, R; Squifflet, JP; Wallemacq, P, 2001
)
0.52
" A transient sensation of burning at the application site was the only adverse event in 31 of the 47 (66%) enrolled patients, but this condition improved after several days."( Safe and effective treatment of refractory facial lesions in atopic dermatitis using topical tacrolimus following corticosteroid discontinuation.
Imaizumi, A; Kashima, M; Kawakami, T; Koro, O; Matsunaga, R; Mizoguchi, M; Morita, E; Murakami, N; Nakamura, K; Soma, Y; Tamaki, K; Yajima, K; Yamamoto, S, 2001
)
0.53
"The present results indicate that topical tacrolimus treatment following corticosteroid discontinuation is safe and effective in refractory facial AD."( Safe and effective treatment of refractory facial lesions in atopic dermatitis using topical tacrolimus following corticosteroid discontinuation.
Imaizumi, A; Kashima, M; Kawakami, T; Koro, O; Matsunaga, R; Mizoguchi, M; Morita, E; Murakami, N; Nakamura, K; Soma, Y; Tamaki, K; Yajima, K; Yamamoto, S, 2001
)
0.79
"To determine whether conversion from cyclosporin A (CsA) to tacrolimus (TAC)-based immunosuppressive therapy is safe and might lead to improvement in the clinical side effect profile we studied 55 cardiac allograft recipients."( Conversion from cyclosporin A to tacrolimus is safe and decreases blood pressure, cholesterol levels and TGF-beta 1 type I receptor expression.
Baan, CC; Balk, AH; Knoop, CJ; Maat, LP; Mol, WM; Niesters, HG; van Riemsdijk-van Overbeeke, IC; Vantrimpont, PM; Weimar, W, 2001
)
0.83
" Renal and systemic vasoconstriction, increased release of endothelin-1, decreased production of nitric acid and increased expression of TGF-beta are the major adverse pathophysiologic abnormalities of these agents."( Nephrotoxicity of immunosuppressive drugs: new insight and preventive strategies.
Bennett, WM; de Mattos, AM; Olyaei, AJ, 2001
)
0.31
" The overall frequency of adverse events was similar in the two groups, though hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia were more common in the ciclosporin group and tremor and hypomagnesaemia were more frequent in the tacrolimus group."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with ciclosporin microemulsion in renal transplantation: a randomised multicentre study.
Margreiter, R, 2002
)
0.81
"Pimecrolimus cream 1% appears to be a safe and effective alternative to currently used therapies for AD."( Safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus (ASM 981) cream 1% in the treatment of mild and moderate atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents.
Boguniewicz, M; Bush, C; Cherill, R; Eichenfield, LF; Graeber, M; Langley, RG; Lucky, AW; Marshall, K, 2002
)
0.31
"No evidence of a retinal toxic reaction was seen in the eyes receiving 10 or 50 microg of tacrolimus."( Ocular toxicity of intravitreal tacrolimus.
Genaidy, MM; Passos, E; Peyman, GA,
)
0.64
" Intravitreal doses of 500 and 1000 microg of tacrolimus proved to be toxic to the retina."( Ocular toxicity of intravitreal tacrolimus.
Genaidy, MM; Passos, E; Peyman, GA,
)
0.67
" In conclusion, the PK/PD model where the myocardial drug concentration of FK506 was linked with its adverse effect could describe, for the first time, the anti-clockwise hysteresis observed in the relationship between blood FK506 concentration and QTprolongation."( Quantitative relationship between myocardial concentration of tacrolimus and QT prolongation in guinea pigs: pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model incorporating a site of adverse effect.
Iga, T; Minematsu, T; Ohtani, H; Sato, H; Sawada, Y; Yamada, Y, 2001
)
0.55
"There were no appreciable differences between treatment groups in the overall incidence of adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream in the long-term management of atopic dermatitis in children.
Bos, JD; Caputo, R; Cherill, R; de Prost, Y; Dobozy, A; Goodfield, M; Graeber, M; Hultsch, T; Manjra, A; Molloy, S; Papp, K; Paul, C; Wahn, U, 2002
)
0.31
" Treatment with pimecrolimus was well tolerated and was not associated with clinically relevant adverse events compared with the conventional treatment group."( Efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream in the long-term management of atopic dermatitis in children.
Bos, JD; Caputo, R; Cherill, R; de Prost, Y; Dobozy, A; Goodfield, M; Graeber, M; Hultsch, T; Manjra, A; Molloy, S; Papp, K; Paul, C; Wahn, U, 2002
)
0.31
"Nephrotoxicity is an adverse effect of cyclosporine and tacrolimus."( Long-term comparison of tacrolimus- and cyclosporine-induced nephrotoxicity in pediatric heart-transplant recipients.
Bacanu, SA; Boyle, GJ; Ellis, D; English, RF; Fricker, J; Harker, K; Law, YM; Miller, SA; Pigula, FA; Pophal, SA; Sutton, R; Webber, SA, 2002
)
0.87
" Tacrolimus, one of the newer agents used in solid-organ transplantation, is gaining increasing popularity because of its ability to reverse refractory rejection in cyclosporine-treated patients and its favorable side-effect profile."( Tacrolimus in cardiac transplantation: efficacy and safety of a novel dosing protocol.
Baran, DA; Chan, M; Cheng, J; Correa, R; Courtney, MC; Fallon, JT; Galin, I; Gass, AL; Lansman, SL; Sandler, D; Segura, L; Spielvogel, D, 2002
)
2.67
" We conclude that administration of tacrolimus via a tailored protocol soon after transplantation ensures a safe and effective means of immunosuppression."( Tacrolimus in cardiac transplantation: efficacy and safety of a novel dosing protocol.
Baran, DA; Chan, M; Cheng, J; Correa, R; Courtney, MC; Fallon, JT; Galin, I; Gass, AL; Lansman, SL; Sandler, D; Segura, L; Spielvogel, D, 2002
)
2.03
" Most adverse events were mild or moderate and unrelated to treatment."( Safety and efficacy of nonsteroid pimecrolimus cream 1% in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in infants.
Bush, C; Cherill, R; Fölster-Holst, R; Gupta, A; Ho, VC; Kaufmann, R; Marshall, K; Potter, P; Takaoka, R; Thurston, M; Todd, G; Vanaclocha, F, 2003
)
0.32
"Pimecrolimus was safe in infants with AD, with rapid and sustained efficacy."( Safety and efficacy of nonsteroid pimecrolimus cream 1% in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in infants.
Bush, C; Cherill, R; Fölster-Holst, R; Gupta, A; Ho, VC; Kaufmann, R; Marshall, K; Potter, P; Takaoka, R; Thurston, M; Todd, G; Vanaclocha, F, 2003
)
0.32
" Within each treatment group, the overall 12-week adjusted incidence rate of application site adverse events was similar for both head/neck and non-head/neck areas."( Safe treatment of head/neck AD with tacrolimus ointment.
Hanifin, JM; Kang, S; Paller, A; Rico, MJ; Satoi, Y; Soter, N, 2003
)
0.59
"Tacrolimus ointment is a safe and effective treatment for atopic dermatitis on the head and neck."( Safe treatment of head/neck AD with tacrolimus ointment.
Hanifin, JM; Kang, S; Paller, A; Rico, MJ; Satoi, Y; Soter, N, 2003
)
2.04
" Full pharmacokinetic profile (days 1, 8 and 22), trough concentrations (days 3 and 15), physical examinations, laboratory measurements and adverse events were recorded."( Occlusive treatment of chronic hand dermatitis with pimecrolimus cream 1% results in low systemic exposure, is well tolerated, safe, and effective. An open study.
Ebelin, ME; Kaufmann, R; Scott, G; Steinmeyer, K; Thaçi, D, 2003
)
0.32
" No serious adverse events occurred; 4/13 subjects showed a total of 6 adverse events at the application site: burning (n=4), and pruritus (n=2)."( Occlusive treatment of chronic hand dermatitis with pimecrolimus cream 1% results in low systemic exposure, is well tolerated, safe, and effective. An open study.
Ebelin, ME; Kaufmann, R; Scott, G; Steinmeyer, K; Thaçi, D, 2003
)
0.32
" The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics, and adverse effects of cerivastatin combined with tacrolimus in renal transplant patients."( Tacrolimus and cerivastatin pharmacokinetics and adverse effects after single and multiple dosing with cerivastatin in renal transplant recipients.
Haas, CS; Kunzendorf, U; Liebelt, J; Oberbarnscheidt, M; Renders, L; Schöcklmann, HO, 2003
)
1.97
" Lipid concentrations, routine laboratory parameters and adverse events were obtained and analysed throughout the study period of 6 months."( Tacrolimus and cerivastatin pharmacokinetics and adverse effects after single and multiple dosing with cerivastatin in renal transplant recipients.
Haas, CS; Kunzendorf, U; Liebelt, J; Oberbarnscheidt, M; Renders, L; Schöcklmann, HO, 2003
)
1.76
" Total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations were significantly lowered by cerivastatin whereas no significant effect of cerivastatin on serum creatininkinase concentrations was observed and no adverse effects were documented."( Tacrolimus and cerivastatin pharmacokinetics and adverse effects after single and multiple dosing with cerivastatin in renal transplant recipients.
Haas, CS; Kunzendorf, U; Liebelt, J; Oberbarnscheidt, M; Renders, L; Schöcklmann, HO, 2003
)
1.76
" Severe adverse events due to HAART have been already reported for post exposure prophylaxis in HIV infected patients."( [Acute liver toxicity of antiretroviral therapy (HAART) after liver transplantation in a patient with HIV-HCV coinfection and associated hepatocarcinoma (HCC)].
Antonini, M; Boschetto, A; D'Offizzi, G; Del Nonno, F; Ettorre, GM; Lonardo, MT; Maritti, M; Moricca, P; Narciso, P; Palmieri, GP; Perracchio, L; Santoro, E; Vennarecci, G; Visco, G,
)
0.13
" Emollients and topical corticosteroids have represented the standard of treatment for patients with AD, despite their numerous adverse effects and patients' tendency towards steroid resistance."( Long-term safety of tacrolimus ointment in children treated for atopic dermatitis.
Eichenfield, LF; Shainhouse, T, 2003
)
0.64
" Disappearance of cosmetic side-effects and improvement of cardiovascular risk factors, together with conservation of renal function, encourage us to use tacrolimus as an efficacious and safe immunosuppressive therapy."( Safety and efficacy of tacrolimus rescue therapy in 55 kidney transplant patients treated with cyclosporine.
Amenábar, JJ; Gaínza, FI; Gómez-Ullate, P; Lampreabe, I; Orbe, J; Urbizu, JM; Virto, J; Zárraga, S, 2003
)
0.83
" Adverse effects were renal dysfunction in 26, hypertension in 23, and neurotoxicity in two."( Effectiveness and safety of mycophenolate mofetil as monotherapy in liver transplantation.
Cuervas-Mons, V; Gómez, A; Herreros, A; Jimenez, M; Lopez-Monclus, J; Moreno, JM; Navarrete, E; Revilla, J; Rubio, E; Sánchez Turrión, V, 2003
)
0.32
" Twenty-two patients (66%) displayed adverse events: five rejections (15%) including four acute episodes, controlled by CI re-introduction, and one chronic reaction."( Effectiveness and safety of mycophenolate mofetil as monotherapy in liver transplantation.
Cuervas-Mons, V; Gómez, A; Herreros, A; Jimenez, M; Lopez-Monclus, J; Moreno, JM; Navarrete, E; Revilla, J; Rubio, E; Sánchez Turrión, V, 2003
)
0.32
" Many of the side effects of MMF were mild; it was safe accompanied by a low incidence of rejection reactions."( Effectiveness and safety of mycophenolate mofetil as monotherapy in liver transplantation.
Cuervas-Mons, V; Gómez, A; Herreros, A; Jimenez, M; Lopez-Monclus, J; Moreno, JM; Navarrete, E; Revilla, J; Rubio, E; Sánchez Turrión, V, 2003
)
0.32
" Concern regarding potential systemic toxic effects has limited treatment options for children younger than 2 years."( The safety and efficacy of tacrolimus therapy in patients younger than 2 years with atopic dermatitis.
Korman, NJ; Patel, RR; Vander Straten, MR, 2003
)
0.62
" Data collected included severity of AD, response to therapy, concentration and blood levels of tacrolimus, any adverse effects, and results of laboratory tests, including complete blood cell count, liver function tests, and serum chemistry profiles."( The safety and efficacy of tacrolimus therapy in patients younger than 2 years with atopic dermatitis.
Korman, NJ; Patel, RR; Vander Straten, MR, 2003
)
0.83
"Tacrolimus ointment appears to be effective and safe in the treatment of AD in children younger than 2 years."( The safety and efficacy of tacrolimus therapy in patients younger than 2 years with atopic dermatitis.
Korman, NJ; Patel, RR; Vander Straten, MR, 2003
)
2.06
"To clarify the incidence and pathophysiological mechanism of cardiovascular adverse effects of tacrolimus, the present prospective study performed scheduled cardiovascular examinations at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 weeks after starting the tacrolimus therapy in 68 consecutive kidney transplantation recipients enrolled from 26 institutes in Japan."( Multicenter prospective investigation on cardiovascular adverse effects of tacrolimus in kidney transplantations.
Hori, M; Seino, Y; Sonoda, T, 2003
)
0.77
" A safety assessment was based on adverse events reported by patients or observed by the physician."( Efficacy and safety of topically applied tacrolimus ointment in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.
Hong, HS; Tsai, HJ; Wong, WR, 2003
)
0.58
" No significant adverse events related to Protopic were observed."( Efficacy and safety of topically applied tacrolimus ointment in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.
Hong, HS; Tsai, HJ; Wong, WR, 2003
)
0.58
"The results of the study suggest that Protopic ointment may be a safe and effective therapy for treating patients at least 2 years of age with moderate to severe AD."( Efficacy and safety of topically applied tacrolimus ointment in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.
Hong, HS; Tsai, HJ; Wong, WR, 2003
)
0.58
" Although topical corticosteroids are often used to control the predominant symptoms of the disease, the chronicity of the condition increases the risk of long-term adverse effects."( An open-label pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topically applied tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of hand and/or foot eczema.
Brooke, E; Fleischer, A; Jorizzo, JL; Lang, W; McCarty, MA; Osborne, BE; Thelmo, MC, 2003
)
0.54
"Nephrotoxicity is the most prominent side effect of the new immunosuppressive drug FK506."( In vitro FK506 kidney tubular cell toxicity.
Ishibashi, M; Kameoka, H; Kawaguchi, N; Kokado, Y; Moutabarrik, A; Okuyama, A; Onishi, S; Sonoda, T; Takahara, S; Takano, Y, 1992
)
0.28
"Tacrolimus, at dosages of both 2 mg/day and 3 mg/day, is efficacious and safe as monotherapy for patients with active RA, but treatment with the 3-mg dose of tacrolimus resulted in generally better ACR response rates."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind trial.
Baldassare, AR; Borton, MA; Furst, DE; Kaine, JL; Mekki, QA; Mengle-Gaw, LJ; Schwartz, BD; Stevenson, JT; Wisemandle, W; Yocum, DE, 2003
)
2.07
" The most common adverse effects were a burning sensation (16%) at the site of application and transient taste disturbance (8%)."( Long-term efficacy and safety of topical tacrolimus in the management of ulcerative/erosive oral lichen planus.
Buchanan, JA; Hodgson, TA; Kaliakatsou, F; Porter, SR; Sahni, N,
)
0.4
" The safety assessment included monitoring all adverse events and clinical laboratory values."( A multicenter trial of the efficacy and safety of 0.03% tacrolimus ointment for atopic dermatitis in Korea.
Chang, HS; Kim, DW; Kim, KH; Lee, KH; Park, CW; Park, YM; Seo, PG; Sung, KJ; Won, CH; Won, YH; Yang, JM, 2004
)
0.57
" The most common adverse events associated with tacrolimus treatment were transient skin burning sensation (45."( A multicenter trial of the efficacy and safety of 0.03% tacrolimus ointment for atopic dermatitis in Korea.
Chang, HS; Kim, DW; Kim, KH; Lee, KH; Park, CW; Park, YM; Seo, PG; Sung, KJ; Won, CH; Won, YH; Yang, JM, 2004
)
0.83
"03% tacrolimus ointment should be considered effective and safe in both Korean children and adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis."( A multicenter trial of the efficacy and safety of 0.03% tacrolimus ointment for atopic dermatitis in Korea.
Chang, HS; Kim, DW; Kim, KH; Lee, KH; Park, CW; Park, YM; Seo, PG; Sung, KJ; Won, CH; Won, YH; Yang, JM, 2004
)
1.13
" There were no significant differences between the tacrolimus groups and placebo group in the incidence of adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (FK506) in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled dose-finding study.
Abe, T; Hara, M; Hashimoto, H; Irimajiri, S; Kondo, H; Sugawara, S; Uchida, S, 2004
)
0.89
"2%) withdrew from the study for adverse events possibly or probably related to tacrolimus, 33 patients (3."( Safety of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: long-term experience.
Bensen, WG; Borton, MA; Burch, FX; Furst, DE; Mekki, QA; Mengle-Gaw, LJ; Schwartz, BD; Wisememandle, W; Yocum, DE, 2004
)
0.95
"This study demonstrates that tacrolimus was safe and well-tolerated and provided clinical benefit over a period of at least 12 months."( Safety of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: long-term experience.
Bensen, WG; Borton, MA; Burch, FX; Furst, DE; Mekki, QA; Mengle-Gaw, LJ; Schwartz, BD; Wisememandle, W; Yocum, DE, 2004
)
1.02
"The adverse effects of tacrolimus have limited the use of this potent immunosuppressive drug in clinical transplantation."( Biodegradable microsphere-loaded tacrolimus enhanced the effect on mice islet allograft and reduced the adverse effect on insulin secretion.
Fujino, M; Funeshima, N; Hara, Y; Kawashima, Y; Kitazawa, Y; Li, XK; Lu, FZ; Miyamoto, Y; Takenaka, H; Uno, T; Wang, Q; Yamamoto, H, 2004
)
0.92
" According to the Naranjo scale, this adverse drug event was probably the result of improved absorption of tacrolimus secondary to metoclopramide therapy."( Tacrolimus toxicity associated with concomitant metoclopramide therapy.
Callahan, BL; Park, JM; Prescott, WA, 2004
)
1.98
" In order to determine the clinical doses of topical tacrolimus and steroids for daily treatment of atopic dermatitis and to elucidate their beneficial and adverse effects, we analyzed the clinical data from 215 patients with atopic dermatitis who were more than 16 years old."( Dosage and adverse effects of topical tacrolimus and steroids in daily management of atopic dermatitis.
Furue, M; Furukawa, F; Katayama, I; Kinukawa, N; Koga, T; Kubota, Y; Moroi, Y; Nakayama, J; Nose, Y; Tanaka, Y; Terao, H; Urabe, K, 2004
)
0.84
" There were no treatment-related serious or clinically significant systemic adverse events."( Long-term safety and tolerability of pimecrolimus cream 1% and topical corticosteroids in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.
Allen, R; Barbier, N; Bos, JD; Fölster-Holst, R; Gulliver, WP; Lahfa, M; Luger, TA; Molloy, S; Paul, C, 2004
)
0.32
"Tacrolimus-induced toxicity is considered a dose-related side effect largely due to a direct action of this potent calcineurin inhibitor on its targets including the kidney and the pancreas."( Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine for a non-dose-dependent tacrolimus-induced toxicity, a pediatric kidney transplant recipient case report.
Edefonti, A; Ferraresso, M; Ghio, L; Giani, M; Mihatsch, M, 2004
)
2.11
"Long-term survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is mainly influenced by adverse events caused by immunosuppression."( Long-term efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplant recipients with calcineurin inhibitor-induced renal dysfunction.
Graziadei, IW; Koch, RO; Königsrainer, A; Margreiter, R; Nachbaur, K; Schulz, F; Vogel, W, 2004
)
0.32
"Induction with monoclonal antibodies for prevention of acute cellular rejection (ACR) may avoid many of the adverse events associated with polyclonal antibodies."( Efficacy and safety of basiliximab with a tacrolimus-based regimen in liver transplant recipients.
Cintorino, D; Doria, C; Foglieni, CS; Gruttadauria, S; Lauro, A; Marino, IR; Piazza, T; Scott, VL, 2004
)
0.59
" In addition, basiliximab does not increase the incidence of adverse effects or infections."( Efficacy and safety of basiliximab with a tacrolimus-based regimen in liver transplant recipients.
Cintorino, D; Doria, C; Foglieni, CS; Gruttadauria, S; Lauro, A; Marino, IR; Piazza, T; Scott, VL, 2004
)
0.59
" Levels were below the level of toxicity and no adverse effects were reported in any of the dogs."( Investigation on the clinical efficacy and safety of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment (Protopic) in canine atopic dermatitis: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over study.
Lopez, J; Marsella, R; Nicklin, CF; Saglio, S, 2004
)
0.57
"Sirolimus is a safe alternative to reduce or eliminate CsA or FK in CAN."( Is sirolimus a safe alternative to reduce or eliminate calcineurin inhibitors in chronic allograft nephropathy in kidney transplantation?
Chen, Y; Chiang, YJ; Chu, SH; Lai, WJ, 2004
)
0.32
" There were no significant differences in severe adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine microemulsion in primary cardiac transplant recipients: 6-month results in Taiwan.
Chou, NK; Ko, WJ; Wang, CH; Wang, SS, 2004
)
0.63
" In conclusion, RATG induction therapy is safe and efficient in HCV-positive liver recipients."( Efficacy and safety of induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulins in liver transplantation for hepatitis C.
Barange, K; Cointault, O; Durand, D; Izopet, J; Kamar, N; Lavayssiere, L; Ribes, D; Rostaing, L; Sandres-Saune, K; Suc, B, 2004
)
0.32
" Hyperlipidemia, diarrhea, peripheral edema, rash, and anemia were the most commonly reported adverse events."( An open-label, pilot study evaluating the safety and efficacy of converting from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus in established renal allograft recipients with moderate renal insufficiency.
Adler, SH; Cohen, DJ; Jensik, S; Peddi, VR; Pescovitz, M; Pirsch, J; Thistlethwaite, JR; Vincenti, F, 2005
)
0.33
"The rats in the control groups and experimental groups administered topical and intravitreal tacrolimus did not demonstrate any systemic toxic effects."( Systemic toxicity of tacrolimus given by various routes and the response to dose reduction.
Akar, Y; Arici, G; Durukan, A; Yucel, G; Yucel, I, 2005
)
0.87
"Topical or intravitreal administration of tacrolimus seems to be systemically safe whereas parenteral administration can cause some systemic haematological changes such as dose-dependent decreased serum cholesterol concentrations."( Systemic toxicity of tacrolimus given by various routes and the response to dose reduction.
Akar, Y; Arici, G; Durukan, A; Yucel, G; Yucel, I, 2005
)
0.91
" Moreover, chronic cyclosporine (CsA)-induced nephrotoxicity is an important nonimmunologic factor contributing to graft dysfunction and loss, and adverse events may require CsA withdrawal."( Switching from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in patients with chronic transplant dysfunction or cyclosporine-induced adverse events.
Blancho, G; Cantarovich, D; Dantal, J; Giral-Classe, M; Hourmant, M; Karam, G; Megnigbeto, A; Renou, M; Soulillou, JP, 2005
)
0.61
" The most common adverse effect following the application of topical calcineurin inhibitors is mild to moderate symptoms of irritation such as burning, erythema and pruritus, which occurred in up to 20% of all children treated with tacrolimus and 10% of children treated with pimecrolimus, and usually faded after a few days."( Safety and efficacy of topical calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of childhood atopic dermatitis.
Breuer, K; Kapp, A; Werfel, T, 2005
)
0.51
" Overall adverse event frequency was similar in both groups, but MMF intolerance was more frequent with tacrolimus and hyperlipidaemia more frequent with cyclosporin-ME."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin microemulsion in primary SPK transplantation: 3-year results of the Euro-SPK 001 trial.
Adamec, M; Boucek, P; Malaise, J; Saudek, F, 2005
)
0.85
" There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (AEs), including application site reactions in the 2 studies involving 650 children."( Tacrolimus ointment is more effective than pimecrolimus cream with a similar safety profile in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: results from 3 randomized, comparative studies.
Antaya, R; Blum, RR; Crowe, A; Fleischer, AB; Jaracz, E; Kirsner, RS; Langley, RG; Lebwohl, M; Linowski, GJ; Paller, AS; Rico, MJ, 2005
)
1.77
"Careful steroid withdrawal from a platform of tacrolimus and MMF is safe and not associated with a significant risk of rejection or graft dysfunction."( Late steroid withdrawal for renal transplant recipients on tacrolimus and MMF is safe.
Borrows, R; Cairns, T; Griffith, M; Hakim, N; Loucaidou, M; McLean, AG; Palmer, A; Papalois, V; Taube, D, 2005
)
0.83
"Neurotoxicity is a well-recognized side effect of calcineurin inhibitors."( Successful conversion to rapamycin for calcineurin inhibitor-related neurotoxicity following liver transplantation.
Forgacs, B; Lappin, J; Merhav, HJ; Mieles, L, 2005
)
0.33
" None of the patients had toxic levels tacrolimus (>15 ng/mL) at the time of symptoms, which persisted despite reduction of CNI dose."( Successful conversion to rapamycin for calcineurin inhibitor-related neurotoxicity following liver transplantation.
Forgacs, B; Lappin, J; Merhav, HJ; Mieles, L, 2005
)
0.6
" Graft function, incidence of acute rejection (AR), findings of protocol graft biopsy and adverse effects were compared."( Quadruple immunosuppression with basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone is safe and effective for renal transplantation.
Fukuzawa, N; Harada, H; Hirano, T; Iwami, D; Miura, M; Ogawa, Y; Satoh, H; Seki, T; Taniguchi, A; Togashi, M, 2005
)
0.59
" This regimen is safe and effective for application during the early period after renal transplantation."( Quadruple immunosuppression with basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone is safe and effective for renal transplantation.
Fukuzawa, N; Harada, H; Hirano, T; Iwami, D; Miura, M; Ogawa, Y; Satoh, H; Seki, T; Taniguchi, A; Togashi, M, 2005
)
0.59
" Lipid profile, oral glucose tolerance, and adverse events were monitored."( Efficacy and cardiovascular safety of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and early steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients: a multicenter, prospective, pilot trial.
Abramowicz, D; Kuypers, D; Meurisse, M; Mourad, M; Squifflet, JP; Vanrenterghem, Y; Wissing, M, 2005
)
0.56
"03% is effective and safe for the management of mild to moderate AD in both adult and pediatric patients, and has a rapid onset of action."( Tacrolimus ointment 0.03% shows efficacy and safety in pediatric and adult patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis.
Boguniewicz, M; Breneman, D; Chapman, MS; Gold, MH; Jaracz, E; Linowski, GJ; Schachner, LA; Shull, T, 2005
)
1.77
" Efficacy and safety assessments included percent body surface area affected, Eczema Area and Severity Index score, individual signs of AD, and the incidence of adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment treatment for up to 4 years in patients with atopic dermatitis.
Caro, I; Clark, RA; Eichenfield, L; Hanifin, JM; Jaracz, E; Korman, N; Paller, AS; Rico, MJ; Weinstein, G, 2005
)
0.64
" Common adverse events included skin burning, pruritus, skin infection, skin erythema, flu-like symptoms, and headache."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment treatment for up to 4 years in patients with atopic dermatitis.
Caro, I; Clark, RA; Eichenfield, L; Hanifin, JM; Jaracz, E; Korman, N; Paller, AS; Rico, MJ; Weinstein, G, 2005
)
0.64
"Tacrolimus ointment therapy is a rapidly effective and safe treatment for the management of AD in pediatric and adult patients for up to 4 years."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment treatment for up to 4 years in patients with atopic dermatitis.
Caro, I; Clark, RA; Eichenfield, L; Hanifin, JM; Jaracz, E; Korman, N; Paller, AS; Rico, MJ; Weinstein, G, 2005
)
2.08
" Efficacy and safety assessments included percentage of body surface area affected and incidence of adverse events, respectively."( Tacrolimus ointment is safe and effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: results in 8000 patients.
Abramovits, W; Fleischer, AB; Gottlieb, AB; Horn, TD; Jaracz, E; Koo, JY; McCall, CO; Pariser, DM; Rico, MJ, 2005
)
1.77
" Two of the most common adverse events, skin burning and pruritus, were generally mild, transient in nature, and decreased in prevalence as AD improved."( Tacrolimus ointment is safe and effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: results in 8000 patients.
Abramovits, W; Fleischer, AB; Gottlieb, AB; Horn, TD; Jaracz, E; Koo, JY; McCall, CO; Pariser, DM; Rico, MJ, 2005
)
1.77
" Early steroid withdrawal in pediatric renal transplant recipients is efficacious and safe and does not increase risk of rejection, preserving optimal growth and renal function, and reducing cardiovascular risk factors."( Early discontinuation of steroids is safe and effective in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.
Benedetti, E; Briars, L; John, E; Knight, PS; Kraft, KA; Lumpaopong, A; Oberholzer, J; Sankary, HN; Testa, G; Verghese, P, 2005
)
0.33
" While providing excellent short-term efficacy, topical corticosteroid usage is limited by potential adverse effects, including impairment of the function and viability of Langerhans cells/dendritic cells."( Immunomodulation and safety of topical calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.
Hultsch, T; Kapp, A; Spergel, J, 2005
)
0.33
" Primary safety and tolerability assessments included skin infection and application site adverse events."( Safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment 0.1% (Protopic) in atopic dermatitis: a Canadian open-label multicenter study.
Langley, R; Tan, J,
)
0.44
"Only 3 (12%) QID patients and 4 (17%) BID patients reported adverse events (primarily mild, transient application-site burning) with no significant difference between treatment groups in the frequency, type, or severity of adverse events."( A randomized study of the safety, absorption and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% applied twice or four times daily in patients with atopic dermatitis.
Abrams, K; Caro, I; Gottlieb, A; Ling, M; Pariser, D; Scott, G; Stewart, D, 2005
)
0.33
" Cutaneous adverse events were recorded to evaluate safety."( Tacrolimus ointment 0.03% is safe and effective for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in pediatric patients: results from a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study.
Boguniewicz, M; Jaracz, E; Lamerson, C; Mosser, J; Raimer, S; Schachner, LA; Sheehan, MP; Shull, T, 2005
)
1.77
" Overall, the incidence of cutaneous adverse events reported was similar for both treatment groups."( Tacrolimus ointment 0.03% is safe and effective for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in pediatric patients: results from a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study.
Boguniewicz, M; Jaracz, E; Lamerson, C; Mosser, J; Raimer, S; Schachner, LA; Sheehan, MP; Shull, T, 2005
)
1.77
"03% is a safe and effective treatment alternative for pediatric patients with mild to moderate AD."( Tacrolimus ointment 0.03% is safe and effective for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in pediatric patients: results from a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study.
Boguniewicz, M; Jaracz, E; Lamerson, C; Mosser, J; Raimer, S; Schachner, LA; Sheehan, MP; Shull, T, 2005
)
1.77
"Clinical adverse events developed in 25 patients (46."( Safety of tacrolimus, an immunosuppressive agent, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in elderly patients.
Kawai, S; Yamamoto, K, 2006
)
0.74
"0 mg/day is safe and well-tolerated and provides clinical benefit."( Safety of tacrolimus, an immunosuppressive agent, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in elderly patients.
Kawai, S; Yamamoto, K, 2006
)
0.74
" In children they can develop systemic adverse events after their application, though sometimes they are useful to reduce the long consumption of other drugs, as topical steroids, or to have influence in the critical aspects of immunomodulation."( [Safety of topical tacrolimus and pimecrolimus in children with atopic dermatitis].
Marín Hernández, D; Rodríguez Orozco, AR; Ruiz Reyes, H,
)
0.46
" The most frequently reported adverse events were common childhood disorders such as nasopharyngitis, pyrexia, upper respiratory tract infections, ear infections, and bronchitis."( Safety and tolerability of 1% pimecrolimus cream among infants: experience with 1133 patients treated for up to 2 years.
Barbier, N; Cork, M; de Prost, Y; Papp, KA; Paul, C; Rossi, AB, 2006
)
0.33
" Patients were assessed at weekly intervals for adverse events and efficacy."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment monotherapy in chinese children with atopic dermatitis.
Chan, HH; Ma, KC; Yeung, CK,
)
0.44
" Pruritus and burning sensation were the two main adverse events reported."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment monotherapy in chinese children with atopic dermatitis.
Chan, HH; Ma, KC; Yeung, CK,
)
0.44
"Long-term tacrolimus therapy appears safe and effective in refractory IBD."( Tacrolimus is safe and effective in patients with severe steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent inflammatory bowel disease--a long-term follow-up.
Baumgart, DC; Dignass, AU; Pintoffl, JP; Sturm, A; Wiedenmann, B, 2006
)
2.18
" Safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring adverse events."( Safety, efficacy, and dosage of 1% pimecrolimus cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in daily practice.
Abrams, B; Cribier, B; Friedlander, SF; García-Díez, A; Gelmetti, C; Hofmann, H; Houwing, RH; Kownacki, S; Langley, RG; Lübbe, J; McGeown, C; Morren, MA; Schneider, D; Virtanen, M; Wisseh, S; Wolff, K, 2006
)
0.33
"No clinically unexpected adverse events were reported."( Safety, efficacy, and dosage of 1% pimecrolimus cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in daily practice.
Abrams, B; Cribier, B; Friedlander, SF; García-Díez, A; Gelmetti, C; Hofmann, H; Houwing, RH; Kownacki, S; Langley, RG; Lübbe, J; McGeown, C; Morren, MA; Schneider, D; Virtanen, M; Wisseh, S; Wolff, K, 2006
)
0.33
" Severe adverse events included bleeding after percutaneous portal access (n=2), severe pneumonia attributed to sirolimus toxicity (n=1), kidney graft loss after immunosuppression discontinuation (n=1), reversible humoral kidney rejection (n=1) and fever of unknown origin (n=1)."( Sequential kidney/islet transplantation: efficacy and safety assessment of a steroid-free immunosuppression protocol.
Armanet, M; Badet, L; Baertschiger, R; Becker, CD; Berney, T; Bosco, D; Bühler, L; Hadaya, K; Majno, P; Morel, P; Philippe, J; Toso, C; Wojtusciszyn, A, 2006
)
0.33
" We evaluated total Quantitative MG (Q-MG) score, anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody titer in the blood, interleukin 2 (IL-2) production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), administration dosage of prednisolone (PSL), and adverse effects of FK506."( Long-term therapeutic efficacy and safety of low-dose tacrolimus (FK506) for myasthenia gravis.
Igarashi, S; Naruse, S; Nishizawa, M; Onodera, O; Oyake, M; Shimohata, T; Tada, M; Tanaka, K; Tsuji, S, 2006
)
0.58
" Although adverse effects were observed in three patients (33."( Long-term therapeutic efficacy and safety of low-dose tacrolimus (FK506) for myasthenia gravis.
Igarashi, S; Naruse, S; Nishizawa, M; Onodera, O; Oyake, M; Shimohata, T; Tada, M; Tanaka, K; Tsuji, S, 2006
)
0.58
"Our study indicates that low-dose FK506 treatment may be efficacious not only in controlling intractable myasthenic symptoms, but also in reducing steroid dosage, and that FK506 is safe as an adjunctive drug to PSL for MG treatment for a maximum of 3 years."( Long-term therapeutic efficacy and safety of low-dose tacrolimus (FK506) for myasthenia gravis.
Igarashi, S; Naruse, S; Nishizawa, M; Onodera, O; Oyake, M; Shimohata, T; Tada, M; Tanaka, K; Tsuji, S, 2006
)
0.58
" These compounds represent a relatively safe class of topical anti-inflammatory, nonsteroidal therapy."( Safety of topical calcineurin inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: evaluation of the evidence.
Leung, DY; Spergel, JM, 2006
)
0.33
"020) [corrected] Adverse events (AEs) incidence and type were comparable between groups."( Safety and efficacy of early intervention with pimecrolimus cream 1% combined with corticosteroids for major flares in infants and children with atopic dermatitis.
Abrams, K; Kianifard, F; Korman, N; Molina, C; Siegfried, E, 2006
)
0.33
"Renal calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity is a frequent side effect of immunosuppression with CNIs in solid organ transplantation, leading to acute and chronic renal failure."( Reverse diastolic intrarenal flow due to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity.
Banas, B; Böger, CA; Krämer, BK; Mihatsch, MJ; Rümmele, P, 2006
)
0.33
" Prevention of allograft nephropathy requires a balance of maintaining adequate immunosuppression, while avoiding the toxic effects of CNIs."( Treatment strategies in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients with calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity.
Höcker, B; Tönshoff, B, 2006
)
0.33
"We investigated whether high-dose Mizoribine (MIZ: a water-soluble anti-metabolite), 4-6 mg/kg/d was as effective and safe as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for patients after kidney transplantation."( Revival of effective and safe high-dose mizoribine for the kidney transplantation.
Doi, A; Hirakata, H; Kitada, H; Ota, M; Sugitani, A; Tanaka, M; Yoshida, J,
)
0.13
" No serious adverse events were observed."( Multicentre, phase II trial on the safety and efficacy of topical tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of lichen sclerosus.
Brinkmeier, T; Fritsch, P; Frosch, P; Gollnick, H; Gross, G; Hengge, UR; Hofmann, H; Krause, W; Marini, A; Meurer, M; Meykadeh, N; Moll, I; Müller, K; Ruzicka, T; Stadler, R, 2006
)
0.57
"1% was safe and effective for the treatment of long-standing active lichen sclerosus."( Multicentre, phase II trial on the safety and efficacy of topical tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of lichen sclerosus.
Brinkmeier, T; Fritsch, P; Frosch, P; Gollnick, H; Gross, G; Hengge, UR; Hofmann, H; Krause, W; Marini, A; Meurer, M; Meykadeh, N; Moll, I; Müller, K; Ruzicka, T; Stadler, R, 2006
)
0.57
" No drug intolerance, adverse events or episodes of rejection occurred during the study."( Orlistat treatment is safe in overweight and obese liver transplant recipients: a prospective, open label trial.
Aerts, R; Cassiman, D; Fevery, J; Libbrecht, L; Mertens, A; Muls, E; Nevens, F; Pirenne, J; Roelants, M; Van der Merwe, SW; Vandenplas, G; Verslype, C, 2006
)
0.33
" There were no treatment-related adverse events, no induction of skin atrophy nor any other application site side effects."( Efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% in adult patients with vitiligo: results of a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study.
Dawid, M; Grassberger, M; Veensalu, M; Wolff, K, 2006
)
0.33
"1% tacrolimus ointment was considered to be safe in the majority of patients."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment with topical corticosteroids in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: review of randomised, double-blind clinical studies conducted in Japan.
Nakagawa, H, 2006
)
1.21
"Several trials have indicated that topical tacrolimus is safe and effective for several immunologic-based skin disorders."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment 0.03% treatment in a 1-month-old "red baby": a case report.
La Rosa, M; Leonardi, S; Marchese, G; Rotolo, N,
)
0.7
"The concomitant use of caspofungin with CyA or TAC in liver transplant patients is safe and seemed to be without hepatotoxic effect."( Safety profile of concomitant use of caspofungin and cyclosporine or tacrolimus in liver transplant patients.
Broelsch, C; Fruhauf, N; Gensicke, J; Gu, Y; Malagó, M; Paul, A; Radtke, A; Rath, P; Saner, F, 2006
)
0.57
" Safety assessment was measured by incidence rate of adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment in pediatric Patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.
Akaraphanth, R; Aunhachoke, K; Chunharas, A; Limpongsanuruk, W; Noppakun, N; Singalavanija, S; Wananukul, S; Wisuthsarewong, W, 2006
)
0.64
" Incidence of adverse events included application site burning (21%), itching (17%), pruritus (9%), infections(3%), and erythema and folliculitis (2%)."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment in pediatric Patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.
Akaraphanth, R; Aunhachoke, K; Chunharas, A; Limpongsanuruk, W; Noppakun, N; Singalavanija, S; Wananukul, S; Wisuthsarewong, W, 2006
)
0.64
"Topical tacrolimus ointment is effective and safe in moderate to severe AD."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment in pediatric Patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.
Akaraphanth, R; Aunhachoke, K; Chunharas, A; Limpongsanuruk, W; Noppakun, N; Singalavanija, S; Wananukul, S; Wisuthsarewong, W, 2006
)
1.08
" The primary end-point was the incidence of adverse events."( Long-term safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children.
Dobozy, A; Goldschmidt, WF; Harper, J; Palatsi, R; Remitz, A; Rustin, M; Sharpe, G; Smith, CH; Turjanmaa, K; van der Valk, PG, 2007
)
0.62
" Drug-related adverse events were only observed in the tacrolimus group."( Efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone aceponate ointment 0.1% compared to tacrolimus 0.03% in children and adolescents with an acute flare of severe atopic dermatitis.
Arcangeli, F; Belloni-Fortina, A; Bieber, T; Fölster-Holst, R; Städtler, G; Vick, K; Worm, M, 2007
)
0.82
" Cutaneous adverse events (local burning, stinging, and itching) occurred in 17."( An open-label pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topically applied pimecrolimus cream for the treatment of steroid-induced rosacea-like eruption.
Chu, CY, 2007
)
0.34
" The lack of a time-related increase in dose-corrected tacrolimus exposure observed with the CYP3A4*1/CYP3A5*1 and CYP3A4*1B/CYP3A5*1 genotypes is associated with tacrolimus-related nephrotoxicity, possibly as a result of higher concentrations of toxic metabolites."( CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 but not MDR1 single-nucleotide polymorphisms determine long-term tacrolimus disposition and drug-related nephrotoxicity in renal recipients.
de Jonge, H; Kuypers, DR; Lerut, E; Naesens, M; Vanrenterghem, Y; Verbeke, K, 2007
)
0.81
" Early results of this ongoing study indicate that a tolerogenic protocol with alemtuzumab induction and tacrolimus maintenance monotherapy is safe in immunologically high-risk renal transplant patients."( Alemtuzumab (Campath 1H) induction with tacrolimus monotherapy is safe for high immunological risk renal transplantation.
Gugliuzza, KK; Lappin, JA; Rajaraman, S; Thomas, PG; Vaidya, S; Woodside, KJ, 2007
)
0.82
" We report the toxic effects of tacrolimus in rabbits receiving intramuscular injections (1 mg/kg/d) and the subsequent dosage modifications that resulted in improved animal survival without toxic effects."( Severe tacrolimus toxicity in rabbits.
Bishop, AT; Friedrich, PF; Gades, NM; Giessler, GA, 2007
)
1.08
"In this study, we investigate the toxic effects of tacrolimus (FK506) on the cardiovascular system at the histopathological level in a rat model and whether these effects can be reversed by the blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) by either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-inhibitors) or an angiotensin receptor antagonist (ARB)."( The blockade of the renin-angiotensin system reverses tacrolimus related cardiovascular toxicity at the histopathological level.
Agirbasli, M; Akoglu, E; Cakalagaoglu, F; Deniz, H; Ogutmen, B; Papila-Topal, N; Tuglular, S, 2007
)
0.84
" The most common adverse events (AEs) that occur with tacrolimus ointment treatment are transient application-site reactions, such as burning or pruritus."( The safety of tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a review.
Rustin, MH, 2007
)
0.95
" Information abstracted included proportion with clinical response and remission (using a modified disease activity index), ability to wean from steroids, need for surgery / time to surgery, and side-effect profile."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in refractory ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease: a single-center experience.
Barrett, T; Benson, A; Buchman, AL; Sparberg, M, 2008
)
0.66
" Adverse reactions were generally mild."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in refractory ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease: a single-center experience.
Barrett, T; Benson, A; Buchman, AL; Sparberg, M, 2008
)
0.66
"Our experience with tacrolimus in UC and CD indicates that it is safe and relatively well tolerated, although its clinical efficacy is quite variable."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in refractory ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease: a single-center experience.
Barrett, T; Benson, A; Buchman, AL; Sparberg, M, 2008
)
0.98
"Present data suggest that pimecrolimus-eluting stents are safe and have a similar healing profile to bare metal stents."( Efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus-eluting stents in porcine coronary arteries.
Baffour, R; Diener, T; Harder, C; Hellinga, D; Jones, R; Pakala, R; Seabron, R; Tio, FO; Tittelbach, M; Virmani, R; Waksman, R; Wittchow, E,
)
0.13
" The most common treatment-related adverse events are transient local reactions, particularly skin burning (16."( An update on the safety and tolerability of pimecrolimus cream 1%: evidence from clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance.
Cork, MJ; Langley, RG; Luger, TA; Paul, C; Schneider, D, 2007
)
0.34
"1% ointments is rapidly effective and safe in pediatric and adult patients."( Tacrolimus in dermatology-pharmacokinetics, mechanism of action, drug interactions, dosages, and side effects: part I.
Dogra, S; Sehgal, VN; Srivastava, G,
)
1.57
" However, the CNIs have a significant adverse impact on renal function and cardiovascular disease, and extended long-term graft survival has not been achieved."( Calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens in solid organ transplantation: focus on improving renal function and nephrotoxicity.
Flechner, SM; Klintmalm, G; Kobashigawa, J,
)
0.13
" We present nine cases of painful neuromuscular disorders, an unusual and rare side effect of high-dose voriconazole in association with tacrolimus."( Neuromuscular painful disorders: a rare side effect of voriconazole in lung transplant patients under tacrolimus.
Amrein, C; Bergé, MM; Billaud, EM; Boussaud, V; Chevalier, P; Daudet, N; Guillemain, R; Le Beller, C; Lillo-Le Louet, A, 2008
)
0.76
" In summary, after long-term follow-up, a CNI-free maintenance regimen consisting of sirolimus, MMF, and steroids was both safe and efficacious among low to moderate immunologic risk renal transplant recipients."( Long-term efficacy and safety of a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen in live-donor renal transplant recipients.
Bakr, MA; Ghoneim, MA; Hamdy, AF, 2008
)
0.35
"1% ointment applied immediately after surgery of fully established LS is a tolerable and most probably safe adjuvant novel treatment option."( Safety and tolerability of adjuvant topical tacrolimus treatment in boys with lichen sclerosus: a prospective phase 2 study.
Ebert, AK; Rösch, WH; Vogt, T, 2008
)
0.61
" Adverse drug reactions presented as symptomatic events in 39 patients (33."( Safety of long-term tacrolimus therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: an open-label, uncontrolled study in non-elderly patients.
Kawai, S; Ohno, I; Seino, Y; Tanaka, K; Utsunomiya, K, 2008
)
0.67
" This study shows that adding daclizumab at 1 mg/kg to standard immunosuppressive therapy provides safe and effective IL-2R blockade."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of daclizumab in pediatric renal transplant recipients.
Alexander, SR; Bouw, MR; Colombani, P; Knechtle, S; Nevins, T; Nieforth, K; Pescovitz, MD, 2008
)
0.35
" Tacrolimus was discontinued in 28 patients, and was discontinued because of adverse reactions in 21 patients."( Safety profile of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Akimoto, K; Kawai, S; Kusunoki, Y; Nishio, S; Takagi, K, 2008
)
1.59
" The incidence of adverse events was low and comparable between treatment groups."( Sustained efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% when used long-term (up to 26 weeks) to treat children with atopic dermatitis.
Barbier, N; Boguniewicz, M; Cherill, R; Eichenfield, LF; Langley, RG; Lucky, AW,
)
0.13
"Despite their efficacy, the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) ciclosporin and tacrolimus carry a risk of debilitating adverse effects, especially nephrotoxicity, that affect the long-term outcome and survival of children who are given organ transplants."( Calcineurin inhibitor sparing in paediatric solid organ transplantation : managing the efficacy/toxicity conundrum.
Brown, NW; Dhawan, A; Tredger, JM, 2008
)
0.58
"It is safe for patients with CAN to use substitute sirolimus for CNI; the incidence of acute rejection did not increase."( Observation of efficacy and safety of converting the calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus in renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy.
Chen, J; Cheng, D; Cheng, Z; Ji, S; Li, L; Liu, Z; Sha, G; Sun, Q; Tang, Z; Wen, J, 2008
)
0.35
" Adverse events were observed in seven cases (12."( Single center prospective study of tacrolimus efficacy and safety in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
Amano, K; Kameda, H; Nagasawa, H; Nishi, E; Ogawa, H; Sekiguchi, N; Suzuki, K; Takei, H; Takeuchi, T; Tsuzaka, K, 2009
)
0.63
"The composite rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 22 months clinical follow-up was 40."( Real world safety and efficacy of the Janus Tacrolimus-Eluting stent: long-term clinical outcome and angiographic findings from the Tacrolimus-Eluting STent (TEST) registry.
Capodanno, D; Capranzano, P; Dangas, G; Di Salvo, ME; Fiscella, D; Galassi, AR; Mehran, R; Mirabella, F; Parisi, R; Scardaci, F; Tamburino, C; Ussia, G, 2009
)
0.61
" Past treatments have relied on a wide variety of anti-inflammatory and antifungal agents, but corticosteroids have limited use because of long-term adverse effects."( Role of topical calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis: a review of pathophysiology, safety, and efficacy.
Cook, BA; Warshaw, EM, 2009
)
0.35
"To examine whether tacrolimus is more effective and safe than cyclosporine (CsA) in inducing remission in patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS)."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
Bagga, A; Choudhry, S; Dinda, A; Hari, P; Kalaivani, M; Sharma, S, 2009
)
0.99
" Adverse events were consistent with the established safety profile for tacrolimus."( Improvement of cardiovascular risk factors and cosmetic side effects in kidney transplant recipients after conversion to tacrolimus.
Bachleda, P; Dedochova, J; Horak, P; Horcicka, V; Krejci, K; Strebl, P; Valkovsky, I; Zadrazil, J; Zahalkova, J, 2009
)
0.79
"Immunosuppression has improved graft and recipient survival in transplantation but is accompanied by several adverse effects like dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease."( Adverse effects on the lipid profile of immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus versus cyclosporin measured using C2 levels.
Aranda Narváez, JM; Fernández Aguilar, JL; González Sánchez, AJ; Pérez Daga, JA; Sánchez Pérez, B; Santoyo Santoyo, J; Suárez Muñoz, MA, 2009
)
0.59
"Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) tends to reoccur frequently, so the therapeutic agent must have a high benefit versus adverse effect ratio for long-term and repetitive uses."( Experience with repetitive use of pimecrolimus: exploring the effective and safe use in the treatment of relapsing seborrheic dermatitis.
Durmazlar, PK; Eren, C; Eskioglu, F; Oktay, B; Tatlican, S, 2010
)
0.36
"Retreatment of the recurrence of SD with pimecrolimus as monotherapy is an effective and safe approach in the management of the disease."( Experience with repetitive use of pimecrolimus: exploring the effective and safe use in the treatment of relapsing seborrheic dermatitis.
Durmazlar, PK; Eren, C; Eskioglu, F; Oktay, B; Tatlican, S, 2010
)
0.36
" Long-term safety studies of up to 4 years have not shown adverse events associated with systemic use of immunosuppressive agents, that is, increased risk of infections, lymphomas or skin cancers."( Long-term safety of tacrolimus ointment in atopic dermatitis.
Reitamo, S; Remitz, A, 2009
)
0.68
" Only short-term adverse events were detected."( Long-term safety of tacrolimus ointment in atopic dermatitis.
Reitamo, S; Remitz, A, 2009
)
0.68
" The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 180+/-14 days and expected to be below 20%."( The ProLimus trial: a prospective, non-randomised, multicentre trial to evaluate the safety and clinical performance of the pimecrolimus eluting stent system (ProGenic).
Agostoni, P; Birkemeyer, R; Grube, E; Haine, S; Haude, M; Jung, W; Müller, R; Sarno, G; van Langenhove, G; Verheye, S; Vrints, C; Wijns, W; Willems, T, 2009
)
0.35
" This paper examines the side effect profile of tacrolimus in a large group of pediatric heart recipients."( Tacrolimus in pediatric heart transplantation: ameliorated side effects in the steroid-free, statin era.
Burch, M; Dawkins, H; Dewar, C; Fenton, M; Simmonds, J,
)
1.83
"Based on this study, treatment with TacroBell is considered to be efficient and safe after primary renal transplantation."( A 6-month, multicenter, single-arm pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of generic tacrolimus (TacroBell) after primary renal transplantation.
Cho, BH; Han, DJ; Huh, KH; Kang, CM; Kim, HC; Kim, SJ; Kim, YL; Kim, YS; Lee, S; Moon, IS, 2009
)
0.57
" The most common side effect of pimecrolimus is burning."( Topical use of pimecrolimus in atopic dermatitis: update on the safety and efficacy.
Werfel, T, 2009
)
0.35
" In conclusion, the conversion to tacrolimus in heart transplant recipients with ongoing or recurrent acute cellular rejection was safe and effective also during a long-term follow-up."( Long-term efficacy and safety of conversion to tacrolimus in heart transplant recipients with ongoing or recurrent acute cellular rejection.
Kautzner, J; Kubánek, M; Málek, I; Skalická, B; Vymětalová, J, 2010
)
0.9
" Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 92."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus for lupus nephritis: a placebo-controlled double-blind multicenter study.
Hashimoto, H; Kawai, S; Miyasaka, N, 2009
)
0.66
"Although tacrolimus levels decreased initially after conversion to Advagraf therapy, 1:1 conversion is safe for hepatorenal function in liver transplant recipients."( Evaluation of clinical safety of conversion to Advagraf therapy in liver transplant recipients: observational study.
Alamo-Martinez, JA; Barrera-Pulido, L; Bernal Bellido, C; Gomez-Bravo, MA; Marin-Gomez, LM; Pascasio, JM; Suárez Artacho, G,
)
0.55
" This article examines clinical, laboratory, and histologic findings that evolved into a paradigm that was never fully consistent with observed outcomes and new evidence that may offer an alternative interpretation for adverse events that are attributed to CNI nephrotoxicity in kidney transplant recipients."( Chronic calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity: reflections on an evolving paradigm.
Gaston, RS, 2009
)
0.35
" During Visit 2 and 3 the following were recorded: impact of treatment change on the severity of GI symptoms (4 point scale: 1-worsening, 2-no change, 3-improvement, 4-resolution), EC-MPS tolerance, adverse events (AEs), patient compliance and physician satisfaction with treatment (4 point scale: 1-bad, 2-fair, 3-good, 4-very good)."( Safety and tolerance of sodium mycophenolate in patients after renal transplantation--an observational study.
Baczkowska, T; Chmura, A; Cieciura, T; Durlik, M; Gozdowska, J; Matlosz, B; Pazik, J; Szmidt, J; Urbanowicz, A, 2009
)
0.35
"The following was concluded in our study: (1) sodium mycophenolate is well tolerated; (2) after switching from MMF to EC-MPS, gastrointestinal symptoms alleviated; (3) EC-MPS is a safe medication, with a low adverse events rate."( Safety and tolerance of sodium mycophenolate in patients after renal transplantation--an observational study.
Baczkowska, T; Chmura, A; Cieciura, T; Durlik, M; Gozdowska, J; Matlosz, B; Pazik, J; Szmidt, J; Urbanowicz, A, 2009
)
0.35
" Corticosteroid (CS)-free maintenance immunosuppression not only eliminates the well-known adverse effects but also may improve long-term outcome."( Safety and efficacy of steroid-free immunosuppression with tacrolimus and daclizumab in liver transplant recipients: 6-year follow-up in a single center.
Ciszek, M; Foroncewicz, B; Krawczyk, M; Mucha, K; Paczek, L; Porowski, D; Ryszkowska, E; Ziółkowski, J, 2009
)
0.6
" They are involved in therapeutic drug monitoring, particularly for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index, prevention and management of drug interactions, and may be called in to identify side effects and adverse events related to drug therapy."( [Designing a tool to describe drug interactions and adverse events for learning and clinical routine].
Allenet, B; Auzéric, M; Bedouch, P; Bellemère, J; Charpiat, B; Conort, O; Juste, M; Rose, FX; Roubille, R, 2009
)
0.35
"In a cohort of 32 renal transplant patients who are potentially at risk for adverse events, we compared tacrolimus (TAC) abbreviated AUC values calculated by a method developed in Asians (AUCw) with those derived for Caucasians (AUCa)."( Evaluation of tacrolimus abbreviated area-under-the-curve monitoring in renal transplant patients who are potentially at risk for adverse events.
Chamberlain, CE; Hale, DA; Hon, YY; Kirk, AD; Kleiner, DE; Mannon, RB; Ring, MS,
)
0.71
" Nanosomal Tacrolimus in human studies showed that it is safe and the pharmacokinetics profile is similar to the marketed HCO-60 based Tacrolimus."( Polyoxyl 60 hydrogenated castor oil free nanosomal formulation of immunosuppressant Tacrolimus: pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability in rodents and humans.
Ahmad, A; Ahmad, I; Ahmad, MU; Ali, SM; Kale, P; Maheshwari, K; Paithankar, M; Rane, RC; Saptarishi, D; Sehgal, A; Sheikh, S, 2010
)
0.98
"Tacrolimus is known to potentially lead to adverse events in recipients with diarrhoea and/or calcium channel blocker (CCB) co-administration."( Tacrolimus nephrotoxicity: beware of the association of diarrhea, drug interaction and pharmacogenetics.
Bensman, A; Deschênes, G; Fakhoury, M; Fargue, S; Isapof, A; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Leroy, S; Ulinski, T, 2010
)
3.25
" We evaluated the incidence of adverse events (AEs), tested specific group differences and assessed the relationship of selected AEs with drug levels."( Cyclosporine, tacrolimus and sirolimus retain their distinct toxicity profiles despite low doses in the Symphony study.
Bernasconi, C; Ekberg, H; Erken, U; Ketteler, M; Mjörnstedt, L; Navrátil, P; Nöldeke, J; Yussim, A, 2010
)
0.72
" Overall, the frequency of adverse events was comparable between treatment groups (24."( Safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment versus pimecrolimus cream in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis previously treated with corticosteroids.
Antaya, R; Heffernan, MP; Kirsner, RS, 2010
)
0.67
" TAC can be considered both effective and safe for the treatment of various manifestations of SLE."( Single center prospective study of tacrolimus efficacy and safety in the treatment of various manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Amano, K; Kameda, H; Nagasawa, H; Nishi, E; Okuyama, A; Suzuki, K; Takei, H; Takeuchi, T; Tsuzaka, K, 2011
)
0.65
" During the study, 15 adverse events related to the ointment were reported."( Efficacy and safety of topical tacrolimus for the treatment of face and neck vitiligo.
Chang, WY; Cheng, GS; Huang, CC; Lo, YH; Wu, CS, 2010
)
0.65
" As in adults, valganciclovir appears to be as efficacious and safe as oral ganciclovir."( The efficacy and safety of valganciclovir vs. oral ganciclovir in the prevention of symptomatic CMV infection in children after solid organ transplantation.
Amir, J; Avitzur, Y; Davidovits, M; Lapidus-Krol, E; Mor, E; Shapiro, R; Steinberg, R, 2010
)
0.36
" Adverse reactions responsible for discontinuation included gastrointestinal symptoms, renal dysfunction, and infection."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in 101 consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Inoue, E; Kaneko, H; Kitahama, M; Koseki, Y; Momohara, S; Okamoto, H; Taniguchi, A; Yamanaka, H, 2010
)
0.67
"1% tacrolimus suspension in ears of atopic beagle dogs without OE was associated with adverse local reactions, development of OE, change in otic cytology, vestibular dysfunction, or hearing loss detected by brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER)."( Safety and tolerability of 0.1% tacrolimus solution applied to the external ear canals of atopic beagle dogs without otitis.
Flynn-Lurie, AK; House, RA; Kelley, LS; Marsella, R; Simpson, AC, 2010
)
1.27
" However, despite being effective, most common adverse events of tacrolimus are low-and-variable bioavailability, burning sensation and pruritus at application site, which prompt for development of novel carrier that could effectively target tacrolimus to site-of-action without producing undesirable side-effects."( Targeting tacrolimus to deeper layers of skin with improved safety for treatment of atopic dermatitis.
Pople, PV; Singh, KK, 2010
)
1
" The traditional treatment for AD flares is topical corticosteroids, which are fast acting and effective for relief of symptoms, but may cause adverse effects, including those resulting from systemic absorption, particularly in children."( The safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis.
Eichenfield, LF; McCollum, AD; Paik, A,
)
0.43
" Our aim was to characterize the short- and long-term outcomes and adverse events associated with the use of tacrolimus in a steroid-refractory pediatric population."( Outcomes and adverse events in children and young adults undergoing tacrolimus therapy for steroid-refractory colitis.
Bousvaros, A; Mitchell, P; Pensabene, L; Watson, S, 2011
)
0.82
" The Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI) and other measures of disease activity, adverse events, and long-term outcomes were assessed."( Outcomes and adverse events in children and young adults undergoing tacrolimus therapy for steroid-refractory colitis.
Bousvaros, A; Mitchell, P; Pensabene, L; Watson, S, 2011
)
0.6
" The most common adverse events included hypertension (52%) and tremor (44%)."( Outcomes and adverse events in children and young adults undergoing tacrolimus therapy for steroid-refractory colitis.
Bousvaros, A; Mitchell, P; Pensabene, L; Watson, S, 2011
)
0.6
" A safe and effective immunosuppressive agent that does not predispose to viral infection is needed in transplantation."( Assessment of efficacy and safety of FK778 in comparison with standard care in renal transplant recipients with untreated BK nephropathy.
First, MR; Fitzsimmons, W; Guasch, A; Holman, J; Roy-Chaudhury, P; Woodle, ES, 2010
)
0.36
" Although the treatment with FK778 decreased BK viral load in this study, it was associated with a less favorable rejection profile and renal function and a higher incidence of serious adverse events compared with reduction of immunosuppression."( Assessment of efficacy and safety of FK778 in comparison with standard care in renal transplant recipients with untreated BK nephropathy.
First, MR; Fitzsimmons, W; Guasch, A; Holman, J; Roy-Chaudhury, P; Woodle, ES, 2010
)
0.36
"The aim of the study is to characterize the pharmacokinetics and the gastrointestinal side effect profiles of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) in de novo kidney transplant patients of Hispanic ethnicity."( The pharmacokinetics of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and its gastrointestinal side effects in de novo renal transplant recipients of Hispanic ethnicity.
Hutchinson, I; Min, DI; Qazi, Y; Shah, T; Tellez-Corrales, E; Wang, J; Wilson, J; Yang, JW, 2011
)
0.37
"To report the first histopathologic description of optic nerve demyelination from tacrolimus (FK 506) toxicity in the absence of toxic levels of tacrolimus in a patient presenting with asymmetric bilateral visual loss after 5 years of tacrolimus therapy."( Asymmetric bilateral demyelinating optic neuropathy from tacrolimus toxicity.
Balcer, LJ; Brozena, SC; Galetta, SL; Levin, MH; Moss, HE; Mourelatos, Z; Pruitt, AA; Trojanowski, JQ; Vagefi, MR; Venneti, S, 2011
)
0.84
" Our patient illustrates that demyelination of the optic nerve causing asynchronous vision loss can be associated with tacrolimus toxicity in the absence of toxic drug levels."( Asymmetric bilateral demyelinating optic neuropathy from tacrolimus toxicity.
Balcer, LJ; Brozena, SC; Galetta, SL; Levin, MH; Moss, HE; Mourelatos, Z; Pruitt, AA; Trojanowski, JQ; Vagefi, MR; Venneti, S, 2011
)
0.82
" No clinically relevant, drug-related adverse events were reported."( Pimecrolimus 1% cream for oral erosive lichen planus: a 6-week randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study with a 6-week open-label extension to assess efficacy and safety.
Bennett, R; Hull, CM; Machan, M; McCaughey, C; Zone, JJ, 2011
)
0.37
" The main challenges now facing pediatricians include ensuring long-term quality of life, optimizing immunosuppression while preventing associated adverse events, and managing a smooth transition from childhood to adolescence and adulthood."( Safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in pediatric liver recipients.
Kelly, D, 2011
)
0.68
"The main objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of and the risk factors for the adverse effects of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in patients who obtained renal transplant from living donors."( Adverse effects of tacrolimus in renal transplant patients from living donors.
Al-Khayyat, G; Bulatova, N; Qosa, H; Yousef, AM, 2011
)
0.91
"There is a significant prevalence of tacrolimus adverse effects and supratherapeutic TAC blood concentrations in Jordanian renal transplant patients in spite of using low TAC doses and overall adequate renal function."( Adverse effects of tacrolimus in renal transplant patients from living donors.
Al-Khayyat, G; Bulatova, N; Qosa, H; Yousef, AM, 2011
)
0.97
" Nevertheless, the chronic nephrotoxicity of these drugs represents a significant adverse factor limiting their long-term use."( Calcineurin inhibitor-induced renal allograft nephrotoxicity.
Bachleda, P; Krejci, K; Tichy, T; Zadrazil, J, 2010
)
0.36
" We look in detail at the disputed relationship between blood concentrations of cyclosporine and tacrolimus and histological manifestation of toxicity and summarize data showing that for toxic effects, local renal exposure to CI and their metabolites can play a more significant role than systemic exposure."( Calcineurin inhibitor-induced renal allograft nephrotoxicity.
Bachleda, P; Krejci, K; Tichy, T; Zadrazil, J, 2010
)
0.58
" Together with optimization of local kidney exposure to CI and their metabolites, efforts to reduce systemic levels as much as possible are the most important preventive measure for reducing toxic renal graft damage."( Calcineurin inhibitor-induced renal allograft nephrotoxicity.
Bachleda, P; Krejci, K; Tichy, T; Zadrazil, J, 2010
)
0.36
" There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of additional use of tacrolimus in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to DMARDs--a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group trial.
Kawai, S; Miyasaka, N; Takeuchi, T; Tanaka, Y; Yamamoto, K, 2011
)
0.64
" One randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that tacrolimus significantly improved lupus nephritis disease activity index (LNDAI) as compared with a placebo, but no difference was observed between these two groups in terms of treatment-related adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus therapy for lupus nephritis: a systematic review of clinical trials.
Choi, SJ; Dai Ji, J; Lee, HS; Lee, YH; Song, GG, 2011
)
0.93
" Tacrolimus trough levels, laboratory parameters, metabolic disorders, selected patient reported outcomes, and adverse events were assessed."( Efficacy, safety, and immunosuppressant adherence in stable liver transplant patients converted from a twice-daily tacrolimus-based regimen to once-daily tacrolimus extended-release formulation.
Beckebaum, S; Cicinnati, VR; de Geest, S; Erim, Y; Gerken, G; Iacob, S; Kaiser, G; Klein, CG; Paul, A; Radtke, A; Saner, F; Sotiropoulos, GC; Sweid, D, 2011
)
1.49
" Despite being effective, most common adverse events of tacrolimus are burning sensation and pruritus at the application site prompting for development of novel carrier that could effectively target tacrolimus to site-of-action without producing undesirable toxic-effects."( Safer than safe: lipid nanoparticulate encapsulation of tacrolimus with enhanced targeting and improved safety for atopic dermatitis.
Pople, P; Singh, KK, 2011
)
0.86
" However, long-term administration of CNI may cause an adverse effect on kidney function, known as chronic nephrotoxicity."( Is arteriolar vacuolization a predictor of calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity?
Goto, N; Horike, K; Inaguma, D; Kawaguchi, T; Morozumi, K; Murata, M; Ogiyama, Y; Otsuka, Y; Suzuki, T; Takeda, A; Uchida, K; Watarai, Y; Yamaguchi, Y; Yamauchi, Y, 2011
)
0.37
" We collected clinical information, including patient background, treatment efficacy (evaluated using the DAS score), and adverse events observed."( Single-center, retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as a second-line DMARD in combination therapy and the risk factors contributing to adverse events in 115 patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Amano, H; Kageyama, M; Kempe, K; Kusaoi, M; Matsudaira, R; Matsushita, M; Morimoto, S; Nawata, M; Ogasawara, M; Onuma, S; Sekiya, F; Tada, K; Takasaki, Y; Tamura, N; Toyama, S; Yamaji, K, 2012
)
0.62
" In this pictorial essay, we review the two most common brain injury patterns, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) and acute toxic leukoencephalopathy (ATL)."( Medication neurotoxicity in children.
Chaturvedi, A; Ishak, GE; Iyer, RS; Khanna, PC; Pruthi, S, 2011
)
0.37
" Red cell exchange transfusion is a potentially safe and effective way of managing severe and symptomatic tacrolimus toxicity."( Red cell exchange transfusion as a rescue therapy for tacrolimus toxicity in a paediatric renal transplant.
Astley, P; Inward, C; Marriage, S; McCarthy, H; Tizard, EJ, 2011
)
0.83
" Nephrotoxicity is an adverse effect that limits their successful use."( Quantitative proteomic analysis of cyclosporine-induced toxicity in a human kidney cell line and comparison with tacrolimus.
Essig, M; Gastinel, LN; Lamoureux, F; Marquet, P; Mestre, E; Sauvage, FL, 2011
)
0.58
" Topical calcineurin inhibitors including tacrolimus and pimecrolimus are safe and efficacious in atopic dermatitis."( Topical calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis - an update on safety issues.
Czarnecka-Operacz, M; Jenerowicz, D, 2012
)
0.64
" Adverse events were few; none led to dose modifications/discontinuation."( Renal function and safety in stable kidney transplant recipients converted from immediate-release to prolonged-release tacrolimus.
Lauzurica, R; Morales, JM; van Hooff, J, 2012
)
0.59
" Sometimes chronic and severe adverse effects refractory to usual therapy other than corticosteroids appear."( Tacrolimus in the treatment of chronic and refractory late-onset immune-mediated adverse effects related to silicone injections.
Alijotas-Reig, J; Garcia-Gimenez, V; Vilardell-Tarrés, M, 2012
)
1.82
"To evaluate the effectiveness of tacrolimus in the treatment of refractory cases of late-onset adverse effects related to MGS injections."( Tacrolimus in the treatment of chronic and refractory late-onset immune-mediated adverse effects related to silicone injections.
Alijotas-Reig, J; Garcia-Gimenez, V; Vilardell-Tarrés, M, 2012
)
2.1
"Case-series study of seven patients with late-onset adverse effects related to MGS injections."( Tacrolimus in the treatment of chronic and refractory late-onset immune-mediated adverse effects related to silicone injections.
Alijotas-Reig, J; Garcia-Gimenez, V; Vilardell-Tarrés, M, 2012
)
1.82
" Skin burning and pruritus were common adverse events among the Asian, United States and European studies."( Overview of efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment in patients with atopic dermatitis in Asia and other areas.
Kim, KH; Kono, T, 2011
)
0.65
") topically is safe for the rabbit eye."( Ocular safety and pharmacokinetics study of FK506 suspension eye drops after corneal transplantation.
Chen, JQ; Huang, X; Yuan, J; Zhai, JJ; Zhou, SY, 2012
)
0.38
"Sirolimus is a safe immunosuppressive option in liver transplant recipients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma."( Impact of the conversion of the immunosuppressive regimen from prograf to advagraf or to sirolimus in long-term stable liver transplant recipients: indications, safety, and outcome.
Croner, RS; Hohenberger, W; Müller, V; Perrakis, A; Schwarz, K; Yedibela, S, 2011
)
0.37
" Adverse events incidence was low during both treatment phases."( Renal function, efficacy and safety postconversion from twice- to once-daily tacrolimus in stable liver recipients: an open-label multicenter study.
Boillot, O; Sańko-Resmer, J; Thorburn, D; Wolf, P, 2012
)
0.61
"This 39-month study following the initial 6-month FK506E study period showed an FK506E-based immunosuppressive regimen in living donor kidney transplantation recipients to be safe and effective."( A 39-month follow-up study to evaluate the safety and efficacy in kidney transplant recipients treated with modified-release tacrolimus (FK506E)-based immunosuppression regimen.
Ha, J; Han, DJ; Kim, HC; Kim, SJ; Kim, YS; Moon, IS; Park, JB; Yang, CW, 2012
)
0.59
"We conclude that switching from Prograf to Graceptor is safe and has the advantage of improving adherence."( Safety and efficacy of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (prograf) to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (graceptor) in stable kidney transplant recipients.
Hama, K; Hirano, T; Iwamoto, H; Jojima, Y; Katayama, H; Kihara, Y; Konno, O; Nakamura, Y; Shimazu, M; Soga, A; Takeuchi, H; Toraishi, T; Yokoyama, T, 2012
)
0.63
" Myfortic with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression was efficient and safe after de novo renal transplantation in Korean patients."( A 6-month, open-label, multicenter clinical study in Korean de novo renal transplant patients evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of myfortic concomitantly used with tacrolimus.
Ju, MK; Kim, SJ; Kim, YS; Moon, IS; Park, SH, 2012
)
0.92
"To examine the efficacies and adverse events of low-dose tacrolimus in intractable myasthenia gravis (MG) patients during a long-term follow-up."( [Therapeutic efficacy and safety of tacrolimus for intractable myasthenia gravis: a report of 36 patients].
Feng, HY; Huang, RX; Huang, X; Liu, WB; Qiu, L, 2011
)
0.89
" And the adverse events of tacrolimus were monitored in each patient."( [Therapeutic efficacy and safety of tacrolimus for intractable myasthenia gravis: a report of 36 patients].
Feng, HY; Huang, RX; Huang, X; Liu, WB; Qiu, L, 2011
)
0.94
" Adverse events occurred in 6 patients (16."( [Therapeutic efficacy and safety of tacrolimus for intractable myasthenia gravis: a report of 36 patients].
Feng, HY; Huang, RX; Huang, X; Liu, WB; Qiu, L, 2011
)
0.64
" And the adverse events should be closely monitored."( [Therapeutic efficacy and safety of tacrolimus for intractable myasthenia gravis: a report of 36 patients].
Feng, HY; Huang, RX; Huang, X; Liu, WB; Qiu, L, 2011
)
0.64
" The serum creatinine, sirolimus trough level, liver function, acute rejection episodes, and drug-related adverse effects were monitored."( Sirolimus conversion in liver transplant recipients with calcineurin inhibitor-induced complications: efficacy and safety.
Guo, ZY; Han, M; He, X; Hu, AB; Ju, WQ; Liang, WH; Tai, Q; Wu, LW; Zhu, XF, 2012
)
0.38
" The adverse effects of sirolimus included hyperlipidemia (7/25), anemia (8/25), and mouth ulcers (9/25)."( Sirolimus conversion in liver transplant recipients with calcineurin inhibitor-induced complications: efficacy and safety.
Guo, ZY; Han, M; He, X; Hu, AB; Ju, WQ; Liang, WH; Tai, Q; Wu, LW; Zhu, XF, 2012
)
0.38
"Sirolimus monotherapy is effective and safe in liver transplant recipients."( Sirolimus conversion in liver transplant recipients with calcineurin inhibitor-induced complications: efficacy and safety.
Guo, ZY; Han, M; He, X; Hu, AB; Ju, WQ; Liang, WH; Tai, Q; Wu, LW; Zhu, XF, 2012
)
0.38
" Six of eight (75%) CYP3A5*3/*3 cases had potentially toxic MaxC0 (>20 ng/mL) compared with none of four CYP3A5*1/*1 cases and 3 of 26 (11."( Risk of tacrolimus toxicity in CYP3A5 nonexpressors treated with intravenous nicardipine after kidney transplantation.
Fukuda, T; Gardiner, R; Goebel, J; Hooper, DK; Kirby, CL; Logan, B; Roy-Chaudhury, A; Vinks, AA, 2012
)
0.81
" A NOAEL (no observed adverse effect level) was not defined because of findings observed also in the low-dose group."( Safety assessment of intraportal liver cell application in New Zealand white rabbits under GLP conditions.
Attaran, M; Barthold, M; Kafert-Kasting, S; Kriegbaum, H; Meyburg, J; Ott, M; Perrier, AL; Priesner, C; Schneider, A, 2012
)
0.38
" In patients whose active RA persists despite treatment with MTX, TAC in combination with MTX is safe and well tolerated and provided clinical benefit for a long time in this single-center retrospective study."( Long-term therapeutic effects and safety of tacrolimus added to methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Akahira, L; Eri, T; Fujio, K; Kanda, H; Kanzaki, T; Kawahata, K; Kubo, K; Michishita, K; Yamamoto, K, 2013
)
0.65
" Six patients experienced minor adverse events, including three minor infections."( Efficacy and safety of multitarget therapy with mizoribine and tacrolimus for systemic lupus erythematosus with or without active nephritis.
Kishimoto, M; Nomura, A; Ohara, Y; Okada, M; Rokutanda, R; Shimizu, H; Suyama, Y; Yamaguchi, K, 2012
)
0.62
" Given the lack of adverse events reported and the cost savings recognized, conversion from brand-name tacrolimus to generic tacrolimus should be encouraged."( Evaluation of clinical and safety outcomes associated with conversion from brand-name to generic tacrolimus in transplant recipients enrolled in an integrated health care system.
Chan, J; Hui, RL; Nguyen, LM; Spence, MM, 2012
)
0.81
" Multivariate modeling showed no significant effect of baseline MPA dose on 12-month risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss or estimated GFR, or on safety events including MPA discontinuation other than a higher rate of gastrointestinal adverse events in patients with an initial MPA dose>2000 mg (p=0."( Association of mycophenolic acid dose with efficacy and safety events in kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus: an analysis of the Mycophenolic acid Observational REnal transplant registry.
Chan, L; Doria, C; Greenstein, S; McCague, K; Narayanan, M; Sankari, B; Ueda, K; Wiland, A,
)
0.34
" Interestingly, T-MNLC showed no evident toxicity exhibiting safe drug delivery."( Development and evaluation of colloidal modified nanolipid carrier: application to topical delivery of tacrolimus, Part II--in vivo assessment, drug targeting, efficacy, and safety in treatment for atopic dermatitis.
Pople, PV; Singh, KK, 2013
)
0.6
"Elderly kidney transplant recipients receiving rabbit antithymocyte globulin did not experience different short-term graft survival, graft function or rates of infection, malignancy or hematologic adverse reactions than did nonelderly patients; they experienced fewer episodes of delayed graft function, but had lower 3-year patient survival."( Evaluating safety and efficacy of rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction in elderly kidney transplant recipients.
Campos, S; Dinh, DB; Feyssa, EL; Jawa, P; Khanmoradi, K; Knorr, JP; Ortiz, JA; Parsikia, A; Zaki, RF, 2013
)
0.39
" MPA was discontinued exclusively because of adverse events (16."( Safety profile comparing azathioprine and mycophenolate in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus and corticosteroids.
Cristelli, MP; Franco, MF; Medina-Pestana, JO; Tedesco-Silva, H, 2013
)
0.61
" The safety of the study drug was assessed using the incidences of adverse events, drug discontinuations, and abnormal laboratory results."( Mizoribine versus mycophenolate mofetil in combination therapy with tacrolimus for de novo kidney transplantation: evaluation of efficacy and safety.
Cho, BH; Huh, KH; Joo, DJ; Ju, MK; Kang, CM; Kim, CD; Kim, SJ; Kim, YS; Lee, S; Park, KT; So, BJ, 2013
)
0.63
"Converting patients to extended-release tacrolimus with was safe in terms of rejection, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia as well as renal and liver functions."( Tacrolimus effects and side effects after liver transplantation: is there a difference between immediate and extended release?
Eberlin, M; Foltys, D; Heise, M; Hoppe-Lotichius, M; Kraemer, I; Otto, G; Thrun, I; Weiler, N; Zimmermann, T,
)
1.84
" A Markov model was used to evaluate the time-dependent probability of an adverse event occurrence by CYP3A5 phenotypes and ABCB1 genotypes."( A Markov chain model to evaluate the effect of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 polymorphisms on adverse events associated with tacrolimus in pediatric renal transplantation.
Conrado, DJ; Derendorf, H; Heuberger, J; Shilbayeh, S; Sy, SK, 2013
)
0.6
" There were 4 significant infectious adverse events during a total of 21."( The safety and efficacy of noncorticosteroid triple immunosuppressive therapy in the treatment of refractory chronic noninfectious uveitis in childhood.
Dick, AD; Guly, CM; Hinchcliffe, A; Lee, RW; Little, JA; Ramanan, AV; Sen, ES; Strike, H, 2014
)
0.4
" Two cases of serious adverse events were associated with cytomegalovirus infection in the multi-target group, namely gastric ulcer and pancytopenia, both of which were successfully treated by antiviral therapy."( Efficacy and safety of multi-target therapy using a combination of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and a steroid in patients with active lupus nephritis.
Hiromura, K; Ikeuchi, H; Kaneko, Y; Kuroiwa, T; Maeshima, A; Mishima, K; Nojima, Y; Sakairi, T; Sakurai, N; Takahashi, S, 2014
)
0.64
"A post-marketing surveillance (PMS) program was implemented to assess the safety and effectiveness of tacrolimus (TAC) in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to identify risk factors related to adverse drug reactions (ADRs)."( Post-marketing surveillance of the safety and effectiveness of tacrolimus in 3,267 Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Harigai, M; Ishida, K; Kawai, S; Miyasaka, N; Takeuchi, T; Yamamoto, K, 2014
)
0.86
"Patients were registered centrally and monitored for all adverse events (AEs) for 24 weeks."( Post-marketing surveillance of the safety and effectiveness of tacrolimus in 3,267 Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Harigai, M; Ishida, K; Kawai, S; Miyasaka, N; Takeuchi, T; Yamamoto, K, 2014
)
0.64
" The most common adverse effects included hyperglycemia (5 cases), myelosuppression (3 cases), and dizziness tinnitus (3 cases), majority of which were temporary and manageable."( [The clinical efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with myasthenia gravis].
Chen, YP; Wang, W; Wang, ZK; Wei, DN; Zhang, J, 2013
)
0.66
" Adverse events were manageable and not common."( [The clinical efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with myasthenia gravis].
Chen, YP; Wang, W; Wang, ZK; Wei, DN; Zhang, J, 2013
)
0.66
" Although improved suppression of HCV replication is anticipated, 20 to 40% of treated subjects have required early treatment discontinuation due to various adverse events including anemia (100%), infection (30%), nephrotoxicity (20%) and rejection (5 to 10%)."( Drug-drug interactions with oral anti-HCV agents and idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity in the liver transplant setting.
Fontana, RJ; Tischer, S, 2014
)
0.4
" Ophthalmic examination revealed no evidence of toxic effects of implants."( Tacrolimus-loaded PLGA implants: in vivo release and ocular toxicity.
Da Silva, GR; Fialho, SL; Fulgêncio, GO; Silva-Cunha, A; Souza, MC; Souza, PA, 2014
)
1.85
" The common adverse drug reactions were infections, renal disorders, and glucose tolerance disorders at incidence rates of 23."( Safety and efficacy of once-daily modified-release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: interim analysis of multicenter postmarketing surveillance in Japan.
Abe, R; So, M; Takahashi, K; Usuki, S, 2014
)
0.65
"This interim analysis shows that a TAC-MR-based immunosuppressive regimen is safe and effective as used in Japanese clinical practice."( Safety and efficacy of once-daily modified-release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: interim analysis of multicenter postmarketing surveillance in Japan.
Abe, R; So, M; Takahashi, K; Usuki, S, 2014
)
0.65
" We retrospectively examined our data to identify the tacrolimus trough concentration that combined efficacy with minimal adverse effects."( Tacrolimus-related adverse effects in liver transplant recipients: its association with trough concentrations.
Arikichenin, O; Jayanthi, V; Narasimhan, G; Perumalla, R; Reddy, MS; Rela, M; Shanmugam, N; Shanmugam, V; Srinivasan, V; Varghese, J; Venugopal, K, 2014
)
2.09
" The most common adverse drug reactions were infections, at an incidence rate of 25."( Safety and efficacy of once-daily modified-release tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients: a multicenter postmarketing surveillance in Japan.
Abe, R; Horike, H; So, M; Uemoto, S, 2014
)
0.65
"This study shows that a TAC-MR-based immunosuppressive regimen is safe and effective as used in Japanese clinical practice."( Safety and efficacy of once-daily modified-release tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients: a multicenter postmarketing surveillance in Japan.
Abe, R; Horike, H; So, M; Uemoto, S, 2014
)
0.65
" The adverse event rates were 33%, 37."( The effectiveness and safety of rescue treatments in 108 patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis with sequential rescue therapies in a subgroup of patients.
Beglinger, C; Bojic, D; Frei, P; Jojic, N; Juillerat, P; Mottet, C; Mwinyi, J; Protic, M; Radojicic, Z; Rogler, G; Schoepfer, A; Seibold, F; Vavricka, S, 2014
)
0.4
"Conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus one month after transplantation is safe and effective."( Safety and efficacy of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus one month after transplantation: randomized controlled trial in adult renal transplantation.
Cho, HR; Huh, KH; Kim, YS; Lee, JS; Oh, CK, 2014
)
0.95
" Pregnancy with SLE is associated with an increase risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes."( Safety of tacrolimus treatment during pregnancy and lactation in systemic lupus erythematosus: a report of two patients.
Izumi, Y; Migita, K; Miyashita, T, 2014
)
0.8
"In conclusion, substantial dose reduction and daily administration of low doses of TAC compose a safe and efficient immunosuppressive regimen during TVR-based triple therapy."( Daily low-dose tacrolimus is a safe and effective immunosuppressive regimen during telaprevir-based triple therapy for hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplant.
Achterfeld, A; Canbay, A; Gerken, G; Herzer, K; Jochum, C; Papadopoulos-Köhn, A; Paul, A; Timm, J, 2015
)
0.77
"Treatment with systemic tacrolimus is possibly safe and effective in reducing graft rejection and prolonging graft survival in patients with high-risk PKP after graft failure with systemic CsA."( Efficacy and safety of systemic tacrolimus in high-risk penetrating keratoplasty after graft failure with systemic cyclosporine.
Omoto, M; Shimazaki, J; Yamaguchi, T; Yamazoe, K, 2014
)
0.99
" Therefore, minimization of side effects, based on safe approaches, can prolong pancreas allograft survival."( Tacrolimus in pancreas transplant: a focus on toxicity, diabetogenic effect and drug-drug interactions.
Rangel, EB, 2014
)
1.85
"Previous reports revealed the potential value of the soluble CD30 level (sCD30) as biomarker for the risk of acute rejection and graft failure after renal transplantation, here we examined its use for the prediction of safe tapering of calcineurin inhibitors as well as late acute rejection."( Soluble CD30 does not predict late acute rejection or safe tapering of immunosuppression in renal transplantation.
Hilbrands, LB; Joosten, I; Valke, LL; van Cranenbroek, B, 2015
)
0.42
"In a cohort of renal transplant patients receiving triple immunosuppressive therapy we examined whether sCD30 can be used as a marker for safe (rejection-free) discontinuation of tacrolimus at six months after transplantation (TDS cohort: 24 rejectors and 44 non-rejecting controls)."( Soluble CD30 does not predict late acute rejection or safe tapering of immunosuppression in renal transplantation.
Hilbrands, LB; Joosten, I; Valke, LL; van Cranenbroek, B, 2015
)
0.61
"Calcineurin inhibitors are effective immunosuppressive agents, but associated adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity may limit efficacy."( Supplementation with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and experimental tacrolimus-induced nephrotoxicity.
Abbud-Filho, M; Baptista, MA; Caldas, HC; Fernandes, IM; Fernandes, MB; Toloni, LD, 2014
)
0.63
" Our results suggest that concentrations lower than 300 ng/ml of CsA and 16 ng/ml of FK-506 are safe for use, as they did not induce genotoxic and mutagenic damage or affect MRC-5 cell viability and proliferation."( Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of high concentrations of the immunosuppressive drugs cyclosporine and tacrolimus in MRC-5 cells.
Camargo-Godoy, RB; Cilião, HL; Cólus, IM; Ribeiro, DL; Serpeloni, JM; Specian, AF, 2015
)
0.63
" In conclusion, BSA nanoparticles might be a more safe carrier for delivery of hydrophobic drug TAC."( Bovine serum albumin nanoparticles for delivery of tacrolimus to reduce its kidney uptake and functional nephrotoxicity.
Gao, Y; Li, C; Li, J; Li, X; Liu, Y; Ma, S; Wang, D; Zhang, C; Zhao, L; Zhou, Y, 2015
)
0.67
" There were no cases of discontinuation related to the appearance of adverse events in the ABT+ TAC group."( Comparison of efficacy and safety of tacrolimus and methotrexate in combination with abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; a retrospective observational study in the TBC Registry.
Fujibayashi, T; Fukaya, N; Hirano, Y; Ishiguro, N; Kaneko, A; Kawasaki, M; Kida, D; Kojima, T; Miyake, H; Oguchi, T; Takahashi, N; Takemoto, T; Tsuboi, S; Yabe, Y, 2015
)
0.69
" The profile and frequency of adverse events was similar in the 2 groups; in both groups, there was no evidence for impairment of humoral or cellular immunity."( Safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus in atopic dermatitis: a 5-year randomized trial.
Boguniewicz, M; Boznanski, A; Dakovic, R; Kristjansson, S; Luger, T; Nieto, A; Paller, AS; Poulin, Y; Qaqundah, P; Ring, J; Schauer, U; Schuttelaar, ML; Sigurgeirsson, B; Todd, G; Vertruyen, A; von Berg, A; Zhu, X, 2015
)
0.42
"Long-term management of mild-to-moderate AD in infants with PIM or TCSs was safe without any effect on the immune system."( Safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus in atopic dermatitis: a 5-year randomized trial.
Boguniewicz, M; Boznanski, A; Dakovic, R; Kristjansson, S; Luger, T; Nieto, A; Paller, AS; Poulin, Y; Qaqundah, P; Ring, J; Schauer, U; Schuttelaar, ML; Sigurgeirsson, B; Todd, G; Vertruyen, A; von Berg, A; Zhu, X, 2015
)
0.42
" Other objectives are: to assess the incidence of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death; the incidences of components of the composite efficacy endpoint; renal function via estimated glomerular filtration rate using various formulae (MDRD-4, Nankivell, Cockcroft-Gault, chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration and Hoek formulae); the incidence of proteinuria; the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events; the incidence and severity of cytomegalovirus and HCV infections and HCV-related fibrosis."( Evaluating the efficacy, safety and evolution of renal function with early initiation of everolimus-facilitated tacrolimus reduction in de novo liver transplant recipients: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Braun, F; Dworak, M; Nashan, B; Schemmer, P; Schlitt, H; Wimmer, P, 2015
)
0.63
" The primary end point was the incidence of adverse events (AEs) in both groups."( A single center, open-label, randomized pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus modified release, Advagraf, versus tacrolimus twice daily, Prograf, in stable renal recipients (single).
Cho, WT; Choi, JY; Kim, SJ; Park, JB; Yang, SS, 2015
)
0.64
"A regimen of TAC-MR once daily can be considered as an effective and safe alternative formulation of tacrolimus in stable renal transplant patients."( A single center, open-label, randomized pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus modified release, Advagraf, versus tacrolimus twice daily, Prograf, in stable renal recipients (single).
Cho, WT; Choi, JY; Kim, SJ; Park, JB; Yang, SS, 2015
)
0.85
"Switching to MT and/or TS several years after heart transplantation appeared safe in the short-term perspective, showing no detectable changes in tacrolimus C0 levels, safety or efficacy, during an average follow-up of six months."( Safety and efficacy of the switch to generic mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus in heart transplant patients.
Rådegran, G; Söderlund, C, 2015
)
0.85
" The study was terminated prematurely due to a high incidence of adverse events."( A 12-month single arm pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients at high immunologic risk.
Huh, KH; Kim, BS; Kim, YS; Lee, J; Lee, JG; Lee, JJ; Park, Y, 2015
)
0.63
" However, they are associated with some adverse events, including nephrotoxicity, a risk factor for allograft failure."( Arteriosclerosis in zero-time biopsy is a risk factor for tacrolimus-induced chronic nephrotoxicity.
Ishida, H; Omoto, K; Shimizu, T; Tanabe, K; Yagisawa, T, 2015
)
0.66
" No significant difference existed between total adverse events and withdrawals in the tacrolimus and pimecrolimus groups."( Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus versus Pimecrolimus for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Children: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Huang, X; Xu, B, 2015
)
0.95
" Renal failure in heart and lung transplant recipients is an essential adverse cause of morbidity and mortality, often originating in the early postoperative phase."( Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Tacrolimus Early After Heart and Lung Transplantation.
Donker, DW; Kesecioglu, J; Kirkels, JH; Meulenbelt, J; Sikma, MA; van de Graaf, EA; van Maarseveen, EM; Verhaar, MC, 2015
)
0.7
" Tacrolimus trough levels, laboratory parameters, metabolic disorders, and adverse events were assessed."( Conversion of twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus is safe in stable adult living donor liver transplant recipients.
Kim, SH; Kim, YK; Lee, SD; Park, SJ, 2015
)
1.59
"5 months after conversion, 9 patients returned to Tac-BID because of adverse events."( Conversion of twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus is safe in stable adult living donor liver transplant recipients.
Kim, SH; Kim, YK; Lee, SD; Park, SJ, 2015
)
0.68
"The conversion from Tac-BID to Tac-OD with similar target trough levels after conversion is safe and effective for long-term stable LDLT patients."( Conversion of twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus is safe in stable adult living donor liver transplant recipients.
Kim, SH; Kim, YK; Lee, SD; Park, SJ, 2015
)
0.68
"The most frequent side-effect of CNIs is nephrotoxicity, which in the long term can contribute, to allograft deterioration."( The safety of calcineurin inhibitors for kidney-transplant patients.
Malvezzi, P; Rostaing, L, 2015
)
0.42
" Adverse event (AE) profiles were similar for both groups, with comparable incidences of AEs and serious AEs."( Conversion of once-daily extended-release tacrolimus is safe in stable liver transplant recipients: A randomized prospective study.
Choi, GS; Joh, JW; Kim, JM; Kwon, CH; Lee, S; Lee, SK; Sinn, DH, 2016
)
0.7
" Adverse drug reactions occurred in 18 patients."( Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Add-On Tacrolimus in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Failed to Show an Adequate Response to Biological DMARDs: The Interim Results of a Specific Drug Use-Results Survey of Tacrolimus.
Ishida, K; Shiraki, K; Yoshiyasu, T, 2015
)
0.67
"Sirolimus should not be started within the first month after liver transplantation (LT) because of an increased risk of adverse outcomes."( Everolimus is safe within the first month after liver transplantation.
Barrera, P; Briceño, J; Ciria, R; De la Mata, M; Ferrín, G; González, V; Guerrero-Misas, M; Montero, JL; Pérez-Medrano, I; Poyato, A; Pozo, JC; Rodríguez-Perálvarez, M; Sánchez-Frías, M, 2015
)
0.42
"Everolimus combined with reduced tacrolimus proved to be safe within the first month after LT."( Everolimus is safe within the first month after liver transplantation.
Barrera, P; Briceño, J; Ciria, R; De la Mata, M; Ferrín, G; González, V; Guerrero-Misas, M; Montero, JL; Pérez-Medrano, I; Poyato, A; Pozo, JC; Rodríguez-Perálvarez, M; Sánchez-Frías, M, 2015
)
0.7
" There was no significant difference in the adverse reaction between the two groups at the 6th or 12th months."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus vs. cyclophosphamide for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis of Chinese adults.
Hu, ML; Li, ZQ; Wang, YM; Zhang, C, 2015
)
0.73
"Oral tacrolimus is an effective and safe option for the short-term treatment of severe plaque psoriasis."( Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Tacrolimus in Adult Patients With Refractory Severe Plaque Psoriasis.
Dogra, S; Mittal, A; Narang, T; Sharma, A, 2016
)
1.19
" Significantly, more CsA-ME patients received lipid-lowering medication and experienced cosmetic and cardiovascular adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with ciclosporin-A in renal transplantation: 7-year observational results.
Arias, M; Banas, B; Dietl, KH; Hörsch, S; Krämer, BK; Krüger, B; Kunzendorf, U; Marcen, R; Margreiter, R; Montagnino, G; Mühlbacher, F; Olbricht, CJ; Rigotti, P; Ronco, C; Sester, U, 2016
)
0.74
"In summary, the use of the generics TAP/MOW is effective and seems to be safe and cost-efficient in stable liver-transplantation patients."( Efficacy and safety of a conversion from the original tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil to the generics Tacpan and Mowel after liver transplantation.
Bellmann, MC; Darstein, F; Galle, PR; Heise, M; Hoppe-Lotichius, M; Lang, H; Mittler, J; Rüttger, B; Vollmar, J; Weyer, V; Zimmermann, A; Zimmermann, T, 2015
)
0.67
" Outcomes included short- and long-term clinical response, colectomy free rates, and rate of adverse events in randomised controlled trials [RCTs] and observational studies."( Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Therapy for Active Ulcerative Colitis; A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Ido, A; Komaki, F; Komaki, Y; Sakuraba, A, 2016
)
0.74
"In the present meta-analysis, tacrolimus was associated with high clinical response and colectomy-free rates without increased risk of severe adverse events for active UC."( Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Therapy for Active Ulcerative Colitis; A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Ido, A; Komaki, F; Komaki, Y; Sakuraba, A, 2016
)
1.03
"One-to-one dosage conversion in stable LDLT recipients is a safe strategy."( Safe One-to-One Dosage Conversion From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Long-Term Stable Recipients After Liver Transplantation.
Chen, CL; Li, WF; Lin, CC; Lin, TL; Lin, YH; Wang, CC; Wang, SH; Wu, YJ; Yong, CC, 2016
)
0.67
"Both groups were followed for 24 months after transplantation for immunosuppressive regimen-associated and time-dependent occurrences of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)."( Time-Dependent and Immunosuppressive Drug-Associated Adverse Event Profiles in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Converted from Tacrolimus to Sirolimus Regimens.
Felipe, CR; Felix, MJ; Osmar Medina-Pestana, J; Tedesco-Silva, H, 2016
)
0.64
" The overall adverse events were also compared between the two groups."( Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and safety between tacrolimus and infliximab for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a single center experience.
Asano, K; Esaki, M; Kitazono, T; Maehata, Y; Matsumoto, T; Moriyama, T; Nakamura, S; Nuki, Y; Umeno, J, 2016
)
0.68
" While no serious adverse events were observed, the incidence of adverse events was higher in patients treated with Tac than in those treated with IFX."( Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and safety between tacrolimus and infliximab for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a single center experience.
Asano, K; Esaki, M; Kitazono, T; Maehata, Y; Matsumoto, T; Moriyama, T; Nakamura, S; Nuki, Y; Umeno, J, 2016
)
0.68
"Tac and IFX may be equally efficacious for the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with UC while minor adverse events are more frequent with the former treatment."( Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and safety between tacrolimus and infliximab for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a single center experience.
Asano, K; Esaki, M; Kitazono, T; Maehata, Y; Matsumoto, T; Moriyama, T; Nakamura, S; Nuki, Y; Umeno, J, 2016
)
0.68
" Although human islets are prone to direct toxic effect of tacrolimus and sirolimus, we found no additive effects of the drug combination."( Treatment with Tacrolimus and Sirolimus Reveals No Additional Adverse Effects on Human Islets In Vitro Compared to Each Drug Alone but They Are Reduced by Adding Glucocorticoids.
Bergan, S; Foss, A; Kloster-Jensen, K; Korsgren, O; Sahraoui, A; Scholz, H; Vethe, NT, 2016
)
1.03
" Conversion to MPS was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events."( Efficacy and Safety of Elective Conversion From Sotrastaurin (STN) to Tacrolimus (TAC) or Mycophenolate (MPS) in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Aguiar, W; Campos, E; Cristelli, M; Felipe, C; Ferreira, A; Franco, M; Gerbase de Lima, M; Hannun, P; Medina-Pestana, J; Sandes-Freitas, T; Tedesco-Silva, H, 2016
)
0.67
" Throughout the treatment period, 37 patients experienced 71 adverse events (AEs) in total, and four patients left the study because of AEs."( Efficacy and safety of low-dose tacrolimus for active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate.
Kim, SI; Lee, MS; Lee, SI; Lee, SS; Lee, WS; Yoo, WH, 2016
)
0.72
"In patients whose active RA persists despite treatment with MTX, low-dose tacrolimus in combination with MTX appears to be safe and well tolerated, and provides clinical benefit."( Efficacy and safety of low-dose tacrolimus for active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate.
Kim, SI; Lee, MS; Lee, SI; Lee, SS; Lee, WS; Yoo, WH, 2016
)
0.95
"In this study, it was aimed to investigate the toxic and teratogenic effects of cyclosporine A and tacrolimus and their combinations with prednisolone using an in vitro rat embryo culture technique."( Investigation of developmental toxicity and teratogenicity of cyclosporine A, tacrolimus and their combinations with prednisolone.
Acar, H; Fazliogullari, Z; Karabulut, AK; Unver Dogan, N; Uysal, II, 2016
)
0.88
" Although the patient was stable after treatment of rejection, a further examination showed a very rare but specific side-effect of tacrolimus."( Unusual case of tacrolimus vascular toxicity after deceased donor renal transplantation.
Hamazoe, R; Hisamitsu, K; Kimura, M; Kobayashi, N; Naka, T; Sugitani, A; Takahashi, C; Taniguchi, K; Yamamoto, O; Yoshida, H, 2016
)
0.98
" We evaluated the safety and tolerability of ATII-cell transplantation by assessing the emergent adverse side effects that appeared within 12 months."( Safety and Tolerability of Alveolar Type II Cell Transplantation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Arguis, P; Bayas, JM; Burgos, F; Closa, D; de la Bellacasa, JP; Fiblà, JJ; Gay-Jordi, G; Guillamat-Prats, R; Hernandez-Gonzalez, F; Marin, P; Martorell, J; Molins, L; Ramirez, J; Rodríguez-Villar, C; Rovira, I; Sánchez, M; Serrano-Mollar, A; Soy, D; Tetley, TD; Xaubet, A, 2016
)
0.43
"No significant adverse events were associated with the ATII-cell intratracheal transplantation."( Safety and Tolerability of Alveolar Type II Cell Transplantation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Arguis, P; Bayas, JM; Burgos, F; Closa, D; de la Bellacasa, JP; Fiblà, JJ; Gay-Jordi, G; Guillamat-Prats, R; Hernandez-Gonzalez, F; Marin, P; Martorell, J; Molins, L; Ramirez, J; Rodríguez-Villar, C; Rovira, I; Sánchez, M; Serrano-Mollar, A; Soy, D; Tetley, TD; Xaubet, A, 2016
)
0.43
"Our results support the hypothesis that ATII-cell intratracheal transplantation is safe and well tolerated in patients with IPF."( Safety and Tolerability of Alveolar Type II Cell Transplantation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Arguis, P; Bayas, JM; Burgos, F; Closa, D; de la Bellacasa, JP; Fiblà, JJ; Gay-Jordi, G; Guillamat-Prats, R; Hernandez-Gonzalez, F; Marin, P; Martorell, J; Molins, L; Ramirez, J; Rodríguez-Villar, C; Rovira, I; Sánchez, M; Serrano-Mollar, A; Soy, D; Tetley, TD; Xaubet, A, 2016
)
0.43
"After LT, an immunosuppressive regimen without steroids could be a safe and feasible treatment for HBVrelated HCC patients, thus resulting in the reduction of HBV recurrence."( Efficacy and Safety of a Steroid-Free Immunosuppressive Regimen after Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Shen, Y; Wang, C; Wang, W; Wei, Q; Wu, J; Xie, H; Xu, X; Zhang, M; Zheng, S; Zhou, L; Zhuang, L; Zhuang, R, 2016
)
0.43
"Safety was evaluated based on occurrence of adverse events."( A Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Tacrolimus versus Methylprednisolone in Ocular Graft-versus-Host Disease.
Abud, TB; Amparo, F; Ciolino, JB; Dana, R; Di Zazzo, A; Dohlman, TH; Hamrah, P; Saboo, US, 2016
)
0.67
" In comparison with few minor adverse events in other two cohorts, several serious adverse events were documented in the tacrolimus group."( Long-term efficacy and safety of common steroid-sparing agents in idiopathic nephrotic children.
Babu, BG; Basu, B; Mahapatra, TK, 2017
)
0.66
" Taking together the long-term efficacy and safety data observed, MMF appears as a safe and effective alternative to tacrolimus in managing pediatric FRNS/SDNS."( Long-term efficacy and safety of common steroid-sparing agents in idiopathic nephrotic children.
Babu, BG; Basu, B; Mahapatra, TK, 2017
)
0.66
" Treatment was generally well-tolerated; only localized adverse effects were reported."( Effectiveness and safety of topical tacrolimus monotherapy for repigmentation in vitiligo: a comprehensive literature review.
Oranges, CM; Sisti, A; Sisti, G, 2016
)
0.71
" GFJ was also effective in achieving a clinical improvement in most cases without causing any severe adverse events, and it helped to decrease the dosages of glucocorticoid and TAC."( Efficacy and Safety of Grapefruit Juice Intake Accompanying Tacrolimus Treatment in Connective Tissue Disease Patients.
Fujii, T; Hashimoto, M; Imura, Y; Mimori, T; Nakashima, R; Ohmura, K; Tsuji, H; Yoshifuji, H; Yukawa, N, 2016
)
0.68
"Many adverse drug reactions are caused by the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent activation of drugs into reactive metabolites."( Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
Jones, LH; Nadanaciva, S; Rana, P; Will, Y, 2016
)
0.43
" The surveillance after transplantation is a very important issue because of both the rejection risk and the adverse effects due to medications after transplantation."( A rare but important adverse effect of tacrolimus in a heart transplant recipient: diabetic ketoacidosis.
Akcan, L; Bayrakçı, B; Ertuğrul, İ; Gönç, EN; Kesici, S; Öztürk, Z,
)
0.4
" Further studies are needed to confirm if monitoring of M-III could minimalize adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity or infections."( Tacrolimus Metabolite M-III May Have Nephrotoxic and Myelotoxic Effects and Increase the Incidence of Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Borowiec, A; Chmura, A; Dadlez, M; Hryniewiecka, E; Jazwiec, R; Nazarewski, S; Paczek, L; Samborowska, E; Tszyrsznic, W; Zegarska, J; Zochowska, D, 2016
)
1.88
"Tacrolimus requires close therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to ensure efficacy and minimize adverse effects."( Impact of a Clinical Solid Organ Transplant Pharmacist on Tacrolimus Nephrotoxicity, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, and Institutional Revenue Generation in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Griffin, SP; Nelson, JE, 2016
)
2.12
" Analysis of withdrawal due to adverse events showed the same pattern."( Comparative efficacy and safety of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis : A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Lee, YH; Song, GG, 2017
)
0.73
"8%) patients had adverse events after conversion, with a liver function test (LFT) abnormality being the most common adverse event (n = 17)."( Risk Factors for the Adverse Events after Conversion from Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Stable Liver Transplantation Patients.
Jeong, J; Kim, H; Lee, KW; Suh, KS; Suh, SW; Yi, NJ, 2016
)
0.66
"We investigated the correlation between CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms and the adverse events in patients with UC."( The effect of CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms on adverse events in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with tacrolimus.
Andoh, A; Asada, A; Bamba, S; Imaeda, H; Inatomi, O; Morita, Y; Nishida, A; Sasaki, M; Sugimoto, M; Takahashi, K, 2017
)
0.67
" The incidence of overall adverse events was significantly higher in CYP3A5 expressers than in non-expressers (P=0."( The effect of CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms on adverse events in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with tacrolimus.
Andoh, A; Asada, A; Bamba, S; Imaeda, H; Inatomi, O; Morita, Y; Nishida, A; Sasaki, M; Sugimoto, M; Takahashi, K, 2017
)
0.67
"The adverse events especially nephrotoxicity were frequently observed in CYP3A5 expressers."( The effect of CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms on adverse events in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with tacrolimus.
Andoh, A; Asada, A; Bamba, S; Imaeda, H; Inatomi, O; Morita, Y; Nishida, A; Sasaki, M; Sugimoto, M; Takahashi, K, 2017
)
0.67
" All side effects and adverse reactions were thoroughly documented."( Long-term efficacy and side effects of low-dose tacrolimus for the treatment of Myasthenia Gravis.
Chen, Y; Huang, X; Jing, F; Tao, X; Wang, W; Wang, Z; Wei, D, 2017
)
0.71
"Switching patients from a CNI to belatacept may represent a safe approach to immunosuppression and is being further explored in an ongoing phase 3b trial."( Safety and Efficacy Outcomes 3 Years After Switching to Belatacept From a Calcineurin Inhibitor in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results From a Phase 2 Randomized Trial.
Alberu, J; Del Carmen Rial, M; Grinyó, JM; Jones-Burton, C; Kamar, N; Manfro, RC; Nainan, G; Steinberg, SM; Vincenti, F, 2017
)
0.46
" The combination was generally well tolerated, with an adverse event profile consistent with that observed in previous clinical trials of SMV or DCV separately."( Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of simeprevir, daclatasvir, and ribavirin in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection after orthotopic liver transplantation: The Phase II SATURN study.
Andreone, P; Berenguer, M; Calleja, JL; Cieciura, T; Donato, MF; Durlik, M; Fagiuoli, S; Forns, X; Herzer, K; Janssen, K; Jessner, W; Kalmeijer, R; Lenz, O; Mariño, Z; Ouwerkerk-Mahadevan, S; Peeters, M; Shukla, U; Sterneck, M; Verbinnen, T, 2017
)
0.46
" Although some immunosuppressants such as rituximab and azathioprine have proven to be effective in relapse prevention, the high costs or intolerable adverse events preclude their wide application."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus treatment for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
Bu, B; Chen, B; Ke, G; Wu, Q, 2017
)
0.77
" There were no serious adverse effects on liver or renal function associated with the therapy."( Drug interactions and safety profiles with concomitant use of caspofungin and calcineurin inhibitors in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation.
Hino, M; Hirose, A; Koh, H; Koh, S; Kuno, M; Makuuchi, Y; Nakamae, H; Nakamae, M; Nakane, T; Nakashima, Y; Nanno, S; Nishimoto, M; Okamura, H; Takakuwa, T; Tokuwame, A; Yoshimura, T, 2017
)
0.46
" The main adverse effects in TAC treatment were glucose intolerance, diabetes and abnormal aminotransferase."( The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy in adult-onset nephrotic syndrome caused by idiopathic membranous nephropathy.
Chen, J; Li, H; Li, X; Liang, Q; Qu, F; Xie, X, 2017
)
0.75
" Conclusions Our survey revealed that a six-month course of tacrolimus is a safe and effective treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus patients with refractory thrombocytopenia."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with refractory thrombocytopenia: a retrospective study.
Feng, X; Li, Y, 2018
)
1.03
" Fifty-three per cent of patients experienced adverse effects, none of whom required treatment withdrawal."( Medium to long-term efficacy and safety of oral tacrolimus in moderate to severe steroid refractory ulcerative colitis.
Amo Trillo, V; González Grande, R; Jiménez Pérez, M; Olmedo Martín, RV, 2017
)
0.71
" Overall, 125 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 94 patients (15."( Safety and effectiveness of tacrolimus add-on therapy for rheumatoid arthritis patients without an adequate response to biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs): Post-marketing surveillance in Japan.
Ishida, K; Shiraki, K; Takeuchi, T; Yoshiyasu, T, 2018
)
0.77
" And the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of tacrolimus were monitored in each patient from the beginning of tacrolimus treatment to the end of the follow-up period."( A multicenter prospective observational study on the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in patients with myasthenia gravis.
Ahn, SW; Cho, EB; Hong, YH; Joo, IS; Kang, SY; Kim, BJ; Min, JH; Minn, YK; Nam, TS; Oh, J; Oh, SY; Park, JS; Park, YE; Seok, HY; Seok, JI; Seok, JM; Shin, HY; Shin, JY; Suh, BC; Sung, JJ, 2017
)
0.95
" The adverse events reported in each included study were used as safety evaluation."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus for myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li, W; Lu, J; Wang, L; Xi, J; Zhang, S; Zhang, T; Zhao, C; Zhou, L, 2017
)
0.77
"The incidence of serious adverse events was not significantly different between the TAC and IFX groups."( Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Tacrolimus versus Infliximab for Active Ulcerative Colitis.
Shimoyama, T; Takeuchi, K; Yamamoto, T, 2018
)
0.75
" Adverse drug reactions are well described in adults but few data are available in children."( Adverse Events under Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine in the First 3 Years Post-Renal Transplantation in Children.
Aurich, B; Baudouin, V; Ha, P; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Lancia, P; Maisin, A, 2018
)
0.8
" Adverse events were collected from medical records and coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities and the implications of tacrolimus and cyclosporine analysed."( Adverse Events under Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine in the First 3 Years Post-Renal Transplantation in Children.
Aurich, B; Baudouin, V; Ha, P; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Lancia, P; Maisin, A, 2018
)
1
" The frequencies of toxic nephropathy and gastrointestinal pain were higher than those in the Summary of Product Characteristics of tacrolimus (> 20%) and cyclosporine (> 10%)."( Adverse Events under Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine in the First 3 Years Post-Renal Transplantation in Children.
Aurich, B; Baudouin, V; Ha, P; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Lancia, P; Maisin, A, 2018
)
1
" The present study was designed to find the toxic effects of tacrolimus on lungs and kidneys."( Tacrolimus induced nephrotoxicity and pulmonary toxicity in Wistar rats.
Akhtar, T; Ghazanfar, R; Shan, T; Sheikh, N,
)
1.82
"Consecutive patients who were treated with adding tacrolimus onto anti-TNF therapy with methotrexate for active RA despite anti-TNF therapy with methotrexate, were retrospectively analyzed in terms of treatment response, achieving remission, subsequent treatment tapering and adverse events."( Long-term efficacy and safety of add-on tacrolimus for persistent, active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.
Iwagaitsu, S; Kajiura, M; Naniwa, T, 2018
)
1
"The results show that steroid-free low-dose tacrolimus-based IS following LT is safe and decreases the incidence of NODM significantly."( Steroid-free immunosuppression with low-dose tacrolimus is safe and significantly reduces the incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus following liver transplantation.
Axelson, C; Bennet, W; Castedal, M; Skoglund, C, 2018
)
1
" Our results suggest that a low Tac target C0 range (5-8 ng/ml) with a low fixed starting dose (3 mg/day) would be safe and effective among Chinese KTRs."( A Low Fixed Tacrolimus Starting Dose Is Effective and Safe in Chinese Renal Transplantation Recipients.
Bai, YJ; Li, Y; Li, YM; Shi, YY; Tang, JT; van Gelder, T; Wang, LL; Yan, L; Zou, YG, 2018
)
0.86
" Three serious adverse events were associated with calcineurin inhibitors."( Safety and Efficacy of Combination Treatment With Calcineurin Inhibitors and Vedolizumab in Patients With Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Christensen, B; Cohen, RD; Colman, RJ; Gibson, PR; Goeppinger, SR; Kassim, O; Micic, D; Rubin, DT; Weber, CR; Yarur, A, 2019
)
0.51
"Combination therapy of vedolizumab with either cyclosporin or tacrolimus is effective and safe at inducing and maintaining clinical remission in patients with CD and UC with up to 52 weeks of follow-up evaluation."( Safety and Efficacy of Combination Treatment With Calcineurin Inhibitors and Vedolizumab in Patients With Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Christensen, B; Cohen, RD; Colman, RJ; Gibson, PR; Goeppinger, SR; Kassim, O; Micic, D; Rubin, DT; Weber, CR; Yarur, A, 2019
)
0.75
"Our findings demonstrate that localized immunosuppression with TAC hydrogel is a long-term safe and reliable treatment."( Local Injections of Tacrolimus-loaded Hydrogel Reduce Systemic Immunosuppression-related Toxicity in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.
Banz, Y; Dhayani, A; Dzhonova, DV; Leckenby, J; Olariu, R; Prost, JC; Rieben, R; Taddeo, A; Vemula, PK; Voegelin, E, 2018
)
0.8
" However, the long-term use of TCS is limited by cutaneous adverse events such as skin atrophy."( Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of adult and pediatric atopic dermatitis: Review on safety and benefits.
Morimoto, H; Nakagawa, H; Ohtsuki, M, 2018
)
1.92
" The primary outcome was complete remission (CR) at 6 months, and secondary outcomes included overall response and adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus combination therapy in patients with lupus nephritis: a nationwide multicentre study.
Bae, SC; Choe, JY; Chung, WT; Jung, SY; Kang, JH; Kim, YS; Lee, HS; Lee, J; Lee, KE; Lee, SS; Lee, YA; Park, DJ; Park, SH; Park, YJ; Suh, CH; Yoo, DH,
)
0.39
" Twenty-one patients reported 29 adverse events, including severe infection requiring hospitalisation (n=3, 10."( Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus combination therapy in patients with lupus nephritis: a nationwide multicentre study.
Bae, SC; Choe, JY; Chung, WT; Jung, SY; Kang, JH; Kim, YS; Lee, HS; Lee, J; Lee, KE; Lee, SS; Lee, YA; Park, DJ; Park, SH; Park, YJ; Suh, CH; Yoo, DH,
)
0.39
" The adverse drug effects of tacrolimus were monitored."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in Osserman grade III and Osserman grade IV Myasthenia Gravis.
Cao, M; Fang, XJ; Jiang, QL; Liang, Y; Liu, XM; She, SF; Wang, SS; Zhao, LN, 2018
)
1.08
" Nineteen patients in the tacrolimus group had adverse drug reactions, but no severe adverse effects appeared."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in Osserman grade III and Osserman grade IV Myasthenia Gravis.
Cao, M; Fang, XJ; Jiang, QL; Liang, Y; Liu, XM; She, SF; Wang, SS; Zhao, LN, 2018
)
1.09
"Our study suggested that tacrolimus could be an effective and safe treatment for Osserman grade III and Osserman grade IV MG patients."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in Osserman grade III and Osserman grade IV Myasthenia Gravis.
Cao, M; Fang, XJ; Jiang, QL; Liang, Y; Liu, XM; She, SF; Wang, SS; Zhao, LN, 2018
)
1.09
" With increased use and new approvals in many different types of solid tumors and hematological malignancies, practitioners in oncology should have an appreciation and understanding of the potential adverse effects of these unique treatment approaches."( Tacrolimus for the treatment of immune-related adverse effects refractory to systemic steroids and anti-tumor necrosis factor α therapy.
Beardslee, T; Draper, A; Kudchadkar, R, 2019
)
1.96
"Costimulatory blockade-based and anti-CD20 antibody/tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapies seem to be comparably safe with steroid therapy in nonhuman primates receiving corneal xenotransplantation, as they did not reactivate Rhesus Cytomegalovirus and maintained manageable systemic status."( Long-term safety outcome of systemic immunosuppression in pig-to-nonhuman primate corneal xenotransplantation.
Che, JH; Choi, HJ; Choi, SH; Hwang, ES; Kim, HP; Kim, J; Kim, JM; Kim, MK; Lee, HJ; Park, CG; Roh, KM; Yoon, CH, 2018
)
0.73
" Nineteen cases of adverse events occurred in 11 patients (35."( Safety and Efficacy of Once-Daily Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: An Open-Label, Prospective, Single-Arm, Phase 4 Study.
Kim, SH; Lee, EC; Park, SJ, 2018
)
0.73
"Our study confirmed delayed initiation of tacrolimus after antilymphocyte induction therapy is safe and effective in renal transplant recipients with slow or delayed graft function."( Delayed Initiation of Tacrolimus Is Safe and Effective in Renal Transplant Recipients With Delayed and Slow Graft Function.
Chen, Y; Cheng, Y; Liu, H; Liu, Y; Shen, Y, 2018
)
1.06
"Transient erythema after alcohol consumption is a side effect of topical tacrolimus use."( [Transient erythema after alcohol consumption; a side effect of tacrolimus].
de Graaf, NPJ; Rustemeyer, T; van Leent, EJM, 2018
)
0.95
" There were no adverse events by TAC in mothers and fetuses."( Changes in the blood level, efficacy, and safety of tacrolimus in pregnancy and the lactation period in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Arawaka, S; Fujita, D; Hiramatsu, Y; Kimura, Y; Kotani, T; Makino, S; Nagayasu, Y; Nakamura, E; Shabana, K; Takeuchi, T; Yoshida, S, 2018
)
0.73
"Calcineurin inhibitors are effective immunosuppressive agents, but associated adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity may limit efficacy."( Tetrahydrocurcumin Ameliorates Tacrolimus-Induced Nephrotoxicity Via Inhibiting Apoptosis.
Jang, HJ; Kim, HJ; Lee, JH; Oh, MY; Park, CS, 2018
)
0.77
"Tacrolimus has been associated with notable extrarenal adverse effects (AEs), which are unpredictable and impact patient morbidity."( The impact of tacrolimus exposure on extrarenal adverse effects in adult renal transplant recipients.
Brazeau, D; Campagne, O; Mager, DE; Tornatore, KM; Venuto, RC, 2019
)
2.32
"High-intensity statin therapy appears safe and efficacious in HT recipients receiving tacrolimus and is a reasonable option for the treatment of refractory hyperlipidemia."( Safety and tolerability of high-intensity statin therapy in heart transplant patients receiving immunosuppression with tacrolimus.
Corkish, ME; Heeney, SA; Hollis, IB; Tjugum, SL, 2019
)
0.95
" Data for adverse drug reactions were collected."( Safety and Effectiveness of Conversion From Cyclosporine to Once-Daily Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in Stable Kidney Transplant Patients: A Multicenter Observational Study in Japan.
Aikawa, A; Sugamori, H; Tanaka, H; Uno, S; Usuki, S, 2018
)
0.7
" Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were recorded."( Safety and Effectiveness of Once-Daily, Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: 5-year, Multicenter Postmarketing Surveillance in Japan.
Uchida, H; Uno, S; Wakasugi, N, 2018
)
0.73
" Adverse events were recorded."( Efficacy and Safety of Delayed Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus Initiation in De Novo Hepatitis C Virus-Negative Orthotopic Liver Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center, Single-Arm, Prospective Study.
Baliellas, C; Busquets, J; Fabregat, J; González-Castillo, A; González-Vilatarsana, E; Lladó, L; Ramos, E; Xiol, X, 2019
)
0.77
" The only reported side effect was discomfort upon application."( Long-term use of topical tacrolimus ointment: a safe and effective option for the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis.
de Castro, RS; de Holanda, EC; José, NK; Müller, GG,
)
0.43
"Despite the small sample size and study design limitations, these results support the long-term use of topical tacrolimus as an effective and safe option for the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis, with good compliance of patients to the treatment."( Long-term use of topical tacrolimus ointment: a safe and effective option for the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis.
de Castro, RS; de Holanda, EC; José, NK; Müller, GG,
)
0.65
"Our aim was to determine potentially adverse effects of immunosuppressive protocols after liver transplantation in children."( Predictable and Unusual Adverse Effects of Immunosuppression in Pediatric Liver Transplant Patients.
Dalgıç, A; Dalgıç, B; Eğritaş Gürkan, Ö; Ekşi Bozbulut, N; Öztürk, H; Sapmaz, A; Sarı, S; Sözen, H, 2019
)
0.51
" In addition to these predictable adverse effects, unusual adverse effects of immunosuppression were also observed."( Predictable and Unusual Adverse Effects of Immunosuppression in Pediatric Liver Transplant Patients.
Dalgıç, A; Dalgıç, B; Eğritaş Gürkan, Ö; Ekşi Bozbulut, N; Öztürk, H; Sapmaz, A; Sarı, S; Sözen, H, 2019
)
0.51
"Within the safety population (everolimus 1014, MPA 1012), adverse events with a suspected relation to study drug occurred in 62."( Safety of Everolimus With Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in De Novo Kidney Transplants: An Analysis From the Randomized TRANSFORM Study.
Adel Bakr, M; Basic-Jukic, N; Bernhardt, P; Buchler, M; Cassuto, E; Chadban, S; Citterio, F; Cruzado, JM; Garcia, VD; Hernandez Gutierrez, MP; Kim, DY; Kuypers, D; Pascual, J; Russ, G; Sommerer, C; Soo Kim, M; Tedesco-Silva, H; Uyen, HD; Viklicky, O, 2019
)
0.51
"De novo everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI yielded a comparable incidence, though a distinctly different pattern, of adverse events versus current standard of care."( Safety of Everolimus With Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in De Novo Kidney Transplants: An Analysis From the Randomized TRANSFORM Study.
Adel Bakr, M; Basic-Jukic, N; Bernhardt, P; Buchler, M; Cassuto, E; Chadban, S; Citterio, F; Cruzado, JM; Garcia, VD; Hernandez Gutierrez, MP; Kim, DY; Kuypers, D; Pascual, J; Russ, G; Sommerer, C; Soo Kim, M; Tedesco-Silva, H; Uyen, HD; Viklicky, O, 2019
)
0.51
"The immunosuppressants tacrolimus and mycophenolate are important components to the success of organ transplantation, but are also associated with adverse effects, such as nephrotoxicity, anemia, leukopenia, and new-onset diabetes after transplantation."( Genetic Variants Associated With Immunosuppressant Pharmacokinetics and Adverse Effects in the DeKAF Genomics Genome-wide Association Studies.
Dorr, CR; Guan, W; Iklé, D; Israni, AK; Jacobson, PA; Keating, BJ; Mannon, RB; Matas, AJ; Oetting, WS; Remmel, RP; Schladt, DP; van Setten, J; Wu, B, 2019
)
0.82
"We performed a genome-wide association study, using a genotyping array tailored specifically for transplantation outcomes containing 722 147 single nucleotide polymorphisms, and 2 cohorts of kidney allograft recipients-a discovery cohort and a confirmation cohort-to identify and then confirm genetic variants associated with immunosuppressant pharmacokinetics and adverse outcomes."( Genetic Variants Associated With Immunosuppressant Pharmacokinetics and Adverse Effects in the DeKAF Genomics Genome-wide Association Studies.
Dorr, CR; Guan, W; Iklé, D; Israni, AK; Jacobson, PA; Keating, BJ; Mannon, RB; Matas, AJ; Oetting, WS; Remmel, RP; Schladt, DP; van Setten, J; Wu, B, 2019
)
0.51
"These results show that adverse effects associated with tacrolimus and mycophenolate are complex, and recipient risk is not determined by a few genetic variants with large effects with but most likely are due to many variants, each with small effect sizes, and clinical factors."( Genetic Variants Associated With Immunosuppressant Pharmacokinetics and Adverse Effects in the DeKAF Genomics Genome-wide Association Studies.
Dorr, CR; Guan, W; Iklé, D; Israni, AK; Jacobson, PA; Keating, BJ; Mannon, RB; Matas, AJ; Oetting, WS; Remmel, RP; Schladt, DP; van Setten, J; Wu, B, 2019
)
0.76
" Adverse events (AEs) were recorded in 258 of 633 patients (40."( Effectiveness and safety of tacrolimus therapy for myasthenia gravis: A single arm meta-analysis.
Lu, J; Wang, L; Wu, H; Xi, J; Zhang, S; Zhang, T; Zhao, C; Zhou, L, 2019
)
0.81
" There was a greater number of adverse events in the LEF + MTX group (66 in LEF + MTX and 49 in TAC + MTX)."( Efficacy and safety of add-on tacrolimus versus leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate.
Baek, HJ; Cha, HS; Choi, IA; Jun, JB; Kang, SW; Kang, YM; Lee, YJ; Park, SH; Shin, K; Song, YW, 2019
)
0.8
"TAC is an effective and safe agent in induction therapy of patients with lupus nephritis."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in induction therapy of patients with lupus nephritis.
Lin, S; Lin, W; Yang, S; Zhou, T, 2019
)
0.82
" Similarly, the incidence of new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), a major side-effect of tacrolimus, can also be reduced by optimizing tacrolimus exposure."( An update on the safety of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients, with a focus on tacrolimus minimization.
Jouve, T; Malvezzi, P; Noble, J; Rostaing, L, 2019
)
1.03
"Only a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and some uncontrolled trials have reported the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of tacrolimus (Tac) in patients with refractory Crohn's disease (CD)."( Therapeutic Efficacy and Adverse Events of Tacrolimus in Patients with Crohn's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Iida, T; Nakase, H; Nojima, M, 2019
)
0.98
"Calcineurin inhibitor-induced neurotoxicity (CIIN) is a common and debilitating side effect after liver transplantation (LT)."( Donor Age Predicts Calcineurin Inhibitor Induced Neurotoxicity After Liver Transplantation.
Agustin Garcia-Gil, F; Jose Araiz, J; Laredo, V; Lorente, S; Lué, A; Martinez, E; Navarro, M; Serrano, MT, 2019
)
0.51
"Trichomegaly is a known adverse effect of systemic administration of cyclosporine but is less commonly associated with systemic tacrolimus or with topical calcineruin inhibitors."( Trichomegaly induced by topical tacrolimus for the treatment of periorbital vitiligo: A brief report of a new adverse effect.
Cowen, EW; Molés-Poveda, P, 2019
)
1
"Mizoribine (MZR) was effective and safe for living Chinese donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) on tacrolimus-based treatment 1 year after transplantation."( Efficacy and Safety of Mizoribine Combined With Tacrolimus in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients: 3-Year Results by a Chinese Single Center Study.
Chen, XG; Liu, H; Shen, ZY; Shi, Y, 2019
)
0.99
" There were no significant differences in adverse events among the MZR or the MMF group, whereas the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly lower in the MZR treatment group (P = ."( Efficacy and Safety of Mizoribine Combined With Tacrolimus in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients: 3-Year Results by a Chinese Single Center Study.
Chen, XG; Liu, H; Shen, ZY; Shi, Y, 2019
)
0.77
" Remission rate, relapse rate, and adverse events in the two groups were assessed."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based treatment for nephrotic idiopathic membranous nephropathy in young adults: A retrospective study.
Bai, DF; Fang, W; Hu, Z; Ji, CF; Wang, L; Yuan, JZ; Zhang, J; Zhang, XJ, 2019
)
0.82
"The TC-coated silicone plate was more effective in inhibiting inflammation and fibrosis versus the MMC-coated silicone plate and was associated with fewer adverse effects in the rabbit model."( Safety and efficacy of tacrolimus-coated silicone plates as an alternative to mitomycin C in a rabbit model of conjunctival fibrosis.
Han, GS; Jung, HS; Kim, ES; Kim, JY; Suh, LH; Tchah, H; Yoon, SY, 2019
)
0.82
" Adverse events were scarce including the two recipients who switched to tacrolimus from cyclosporine at the beginning of the treatment."( Safety of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Renal Function in Post-Kidney Transplant Patients Infected with Hepatitis C Virus and a 100% 12-Week Sustained Virologic Response: A Single-Center Study.
Haga, I; Kawagishi, N; Nakamura, A; Takayama, T, 2020
)
0.79
" Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 28 patients (35."( Efficacy and safety of prolonged-release tacrolimus in stable pediatric allograft recipients converted from immediate-release tacrolimus - a Phase 2, open-label, single-arm, one-way crossover study.
Czubkowski, P; D'Antiga, L; Debray, D; Iserin, F; Kazeem, G; Kelly, D; Marks, SD; Reding, R; Riva, S; Rivet, C; Rubik, J; Sellier-Leclerc, AL; Tönshoff, B; Undre, N; Vondrak, K; Webb, NJA, 2019
)
0.78
" The final result is a ready-to-use compounding vehicle, containing minimal excipients, safe for children's use and stable for 6 months."( Development of a safe and versatile suspension vehicle for pediatric use: Formulation development.
Alarie, H; Leclair, G; Roullin, VG, 2019
)
0.51
" However, its monitoring remains complicated and underexposure increases the risk of rejection, whereas overexposure increases the risk of adverse effects, primarily nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, infections, malignancies, diabetes, and gastrointestinal complaints."( Tacrolimus: 20 years of use in adult kidney transplantation. What we should know about its nephrotoxicity.
Bentata, Y, 2020
)
2
"Guidelines recommend classical combined therapy of steroid and cyclophosphamide (CYC) for patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN), while it is associated with severe adverse effects."( Effectiveness and safety of cyclophosphamide or tacrolimus therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy.
Jiang, F; Xu, G; Zou, H, 2020
)
0.81
" Although the cumulative incidence of serious and non-serious adverse events was not different significantly between the two groups, the incidence after first 3 months was lower in TAC group."( Effectiveness and safety of cyclophosphamide or tacrolimus therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy.
Jiang, F; Xu, G; Zou, H, 2020
)
0.81
" Adverse events were assessed throughout."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in de novo pediatric transplant recipients randomized to receive immediate- or prolonged-release tacrolimus.
Debray, D; Dhawan, A; Grenda, R; Holt, RCL; Kazeem, G; Kelly, D; Lachaux, A; Marks, SD; Parisi, F; Undre, N; Vondrak, K; Webb, NJA, 2019
)
0.82
" No severe adverse effects were seen during the treatment."( Young children with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis can be treated safely and effectively with either topical tacrolimus or mild corticosteroids.
Ahola, M; Mäkelä, MJ; Mikkola, T; Pelkonen, AS; Perälä, M; Remitz, A, 2020
)
0.77
" Small children may need stronger but nevertheless safe ointment options when treating moderate-to-severe AD."( Young children with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis can be treated safely and effectively with either topical tacrolimus or mild corticosteroids.
Ahola, M; Mäkelä, MJ; Mikkola, T; Pelkonen, AS; Perälä, M; Remitz, A, 2020
)
0.77
" Secondary end points were 12-month survival rate, adverse events, and changes in laboratory data."( Multicenter Prospective Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Immunosuppressive Therapy With High-Dose Glucocorticoid, Tacrolimus, and Cyclophosphamide in Interstitial Lung Diseases Accompanied by Anti-Melanoma Differentiation-Associated Gene 5-Pos
Akizuki, S; Handa, T; Hashimoto, M; Hatta, K; Hirata, S; Hosono, Y; Imura, Y; Katayama, M; Mimori, T; Murakami, K; Nakashima, R; Nojima, T; Ohmura, K; Sugiyama, E; Taguchi, Y; Tanaka, M; Tanizawa, K; Tsuji, H; Uozumi, R; Yagita, M; Yoshifuji, H, 2020
)
0.76
" No adverse events were reported during the study."( Efficacy and safety of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) related decapeptide solution plus Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment versus Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment in the treatment of stable vitiligo.
Godse, K; Grandhi, S; Mahajan, S; Parsad, D; Pathak, R; Shah, B; Sharma, A; Shendkar, S; Teli, C, 2019
)
0.73
" Pancreatitis is the most common adverse event after ERCP (PEP)."( Tacrolimus and Indomethacin Are Safe and Effective at Reducing Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients Who Have Undergone Liver Transplantation.
Ahmad, NA; Chandrasekhara, V; Forde, KA; Ginsberg, GG; Khungar, V; Kochman, ML; Thiruvengadam, NR, 2020
)
2
"CsA is an effective and safe agent in the therapy of patients with SRNS."( Efficacy and safety of cyclosporine a for patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a meta-analysis.
Li, HY; Zhang, X; Zhong, H; Zhong, Z; Zhou, T, 2019
)
0.51
" Only one patient discontinued add-on TAC therapy due to an adverse event (itching sensation)."( Clinical effectiveness and safety of additional administration of tacrolimus in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to abatacept: A retrospective cohort study.
Asai, S; Fujibayashi, T; Hayashi, M; Hirano, Y; Ishiguro, N; Kato, T; Kida, D; Kojima, T; Oguchi, T; Suzuki, M; Takahashi, N; Yabe, Y, 2019
)
0.75
"To evaluate the association between tacrolimus trough levels and dosage in Pakistani patients undergoing live donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and the efficacy and adverse effects at different tacrolimus trough levels and dosages."( Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus in Pakistani Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients.
Ahmad, A; Azam, F; Bhatti, ABH; Dar, FS; Javed, N; Khan, M, 2019
)
1.07
" Acute cellular rejection (ACR), sepsis and other adverse events were monitored at different tacrolimus trough levels in early post-transplantation period."( Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus in Pakistani Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients.
Ahmad, A; Azam, F; Bhatti, ABH; Dar, FS; Javed, N; Khan, M, 2019
)
1.02
" Sepsis (27%) psychosis (20%), seizures (10%), and renal insufficiency (13%) were the most common adverse effects."( Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus in Pakistani Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients.
Ahmad, A; Azam, F; Bhatti, ABH; Dar, FS; Javed, N; Khan, M, 2019
)
0.8
"5 ng/ml appears to be safe in Pakistani liver transplant recipients significantly minimising the risk of ACR and other adverse events."( Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus in Pakistani Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients.
Ahmad, A; Azam, F; Bhatti, ABH; Dar, FS; Javed, N; Khan, M, 2019
)
0.8
" Infection, nephrotoxicity, gastrointestinal symptoms and hypertension are the most common adverse events."( Off-label use of tacrolimus in children with glomerular disease: Effectiveness, safety and pharmacokinetics.
Hao, GX; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Song, LL; Su, LQ; Zhang, DF; Zhao, W, 2020
)
0.9
"Acute nephrotoxicity is a common adverse reaction of tacrolimus therapy; however, its risk factors in pediatric nephrotic syndrome (NS) remain to be evaluated."( Risk factors and clinical characteristics of tacrolimus-induced acute nephrotoxicity in children with nephrotic syndrome: a retrospective case-control study.
Gao, P; Guan, XL; Huang, R; Liu, MC; Luan, JW; Shang-Guan, XF; Wang, XW; Xu, H, 2020
)
1.07
" Both regimens were well-tolerated, and medication side effect burden tended to be less severe in the intervention group."( Preliminary assessment of safety and adherence to a once-daily immunosuppression regimen in kidney transplantation: Results of a randomized controlled pilot study.
Dubay, D; Fleming, JN; McGillicuddy, JW; Nadig, S; Posadas-Salas, A; Rao, V; Rohan, V; Su, Z; Taber, DJ, 2020
)
0.56
" We analyzed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), graft rejection, serum creatinine, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody, and the occurrence of adverse events among the 3 groups."( Efficacy and Safety of a Quadruple Regimen Compared with Triple Regimens in Patients with Mycophenolic Acid-Related Gastrointestinal Complications After Renal Transplantation: A Short-Term Single-Center Study.
Geng, L; Li, E; Peng, Z; Sun, H; Tian, J; Xian, W, 2020
)
0.56
"At our institution, tacrolimus is used as a second-line agent for the prevention and treatment of graft-versus-host-disease in the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) unit after patients have experienced a serious or intolerable adverse event to cyclosporine."( Safety of two-hour intermittent intravenous infusions of tacrolimus in the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation unit.
Bacopoulos, AJ; Dara, C; Deotare, U; Ho, L; Kim, DD; Lipton, JH; Loach, D; Messner, HA; Michelis, FV; Ng, P; Thyagu, S; Viswabandya, A; Yang, A, 2021
)
1.19
" The most common serious adverse drug reactions (ADR) included pneumonia (1."( Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of Tacrolimus in Patients With Lupus Nephritis: 5-year Interim Postmarketing Surveillance Study in Japan (TRUST).
Makino, H; Takeuchi, T; Uno, S; Wakasugi, N, 2021
)
0.89
" We used a random-effects model with a Bayesian approach to appraise both renal outcomes and serious adverse effects."( The efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapies in the treatment of IgA nephropathy: A network meta-analysis.
Dong, L; Hu, T; Qin, W; Tan, J; Tang, Y; Tarun, P; Xu, Y; Ye, D; Zhong, Z, 2020
)
0.56
"We conclude that administration of IV tacrolimus twice daily over 4 h may be safe and effective in preventing GvHD in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant."( Twice-daily intravenous bolus tacrolimus infusion: A safe and effective regimen for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis.
Baize, T; Bhandari, S; Emmons, R; Figg, L; Hashmi, H; Hegazi, M; Krem, MM; Kumar, R; Rhodes, JB; Tripathi, P, 2020
)
1.12
" Transplantation of hPSC-derived cell populations into preclinical models has generated teratomas (tumors arising from undifferentiated hPSCs), unwanted tissues, and other types of adverse events."( Improving the safety of human pluripotent stem cell therapies using genome-edited orthogonal safeguards.
Cromer, MK; Fowler, JL; Lesch, BJ; Loh, KM; Martin, RM; Nishimura, T; Ponce, E; Porteus, MH; Uchida, N, 2020
)
0.56
" In 21 patients, EVR dose, trough level, outcomes, and adverse effects were assessed."( Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus Rescue Treatment After Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation.
Bessho, K; Deguchi, K; Kodama, T; Noguchi, Y; Nomura, M; Okuyama, H; Saka, R; Tazuke, Y; Ueno, T; Watanabe, M,
)
0.13
"In this single-center, prospective, randomized study, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), viral infections, laboratory abnormalities, dose reductions, and temporary or permanent discontinuation of the immunosuppressant were compared among patients receiving r-ATG/EVR (n = 85), BAS/EVR (n = 102), and BAS/MPS (n = 101)."( Immunosuppressive Drug-Associated Adverse Event Profiles in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus Doses.
Felipe, CR; Medina Pestana, JO; Miranda, TA; Santos, RHN; Tedesco-Silva Junior, H, 2020
)
0.76
"Basiliximab-induced IS protocol is a safe regimen that reduces medium-term renal dysfunction and achieves similar survival without increasing the acute rejection or infection rate in liver transplantation recipients."( Efficacy and safety of basiliximab as initial immunosuppression in liver transplantation: A single center study.
Alsebaey, A; Hashim, M; Ragab, A; Soliman, HE; Waked, I,
)
0.13
"A TAC Cmin of 4-7 ng/mL seems safe and capable of improving graft and kidney function."( Redefining Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation: A Target Trough Concentration of 4-7 ng/mL During the First Month After Liver Transplantation is Safe and Improves Graft and Renal Function.
Bardou-Jacquet, E; Bellissant, E; Bergeat, D; Boudjema, K; Camus, C; Collet, N; Houssel-Debry, P; Jézéquel, C; Lemaitre, F; Pastoret, C; Petitcollin, A; Rayar, M; Renard, T; Tron, C; Verdier, MC, 2020
)
0.82
"Design choices in EHR systems strongly influence safe prescribing of ciclosporin, tacrolimus, and diltiazem, and breaches are prevalent in general practices in England."( Impact of Electronic Health Record Interface Design on Unsafe Prescribing of Ciclosporin, Tacrolimus, and Diltiazem: Cohort Study in English National Health Service Primary Care.
Bacon, S; Croker, R; Curtis, HJ; Goldacre, B; MacKenna, B; Walker, AJ, 2020
)
1
" Evidence on the use of TCIs for infants has almost been exclusively collected for pimecrolimus, with >4000 infants evaluated in clinical trials, consistently confirming that pimecrolimus is a safe and effective treatment for infants with AD."( Unmet medical needs in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in infants: An Expert consensus on safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus.
Augustin, M; Lambert, J; Luger, T; Paul, C; Pincelli, C; Torrelo, A; Vestergaard, C; Wahn, U; Werfel, T, 2021
)
0.62
"Haploidentical HSCT with PTCy is a safe and effective therapy for children with acute leukemia."( Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation With Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide for Pediatric Acute Leukemia is Safe and Effective.
Chatterjee, G; Kapoor, R; Nivargi, S; Rastogi, N; Sharma, A; Yadav, SP, 2021
)
0.62
"Lung toxicity is a rare but serious side effect of sirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor used as an immunosuppressive agent in solid-organ transplant recipients."( Role of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomogram Scan in Sirolimus-Induced Lung Toxicity: A Rare Case Report.
Albaiz, F; Alothman, B; Alrasheedi, S; Saleemi, A; Saleemi, S; Shah, YZ, 2020
)
0.56
"We have demonstrated that delayed CNI introduction without antibody induction is safe and helps preserve kidney function."( Delayed Calcineurin Inhibitor Introduction Without Antibody Induction in Liver Transplantation Is Safe and Helps Preserve Kidney Function.
Assawasirisin, C; Dumronggittigule, W; Kositamongkol, P; Limsrichamrern, S; Mahawithitwong, P; Sangserestid, P; Sirivatanauksorn, Y; Tovikkai, C, 2021
)
0.62
" Genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes have been identified as the potential targets in developing a pharmacogenetic strategy, to individualize drug dose and also in preventing the adverse events."( Impact of Pharmacogenetic Determinants of Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate on Adverse Events in Renal Transplant Patients.
Kutala, VK; Raju, SB; Sreenu, B; Thishya, K, 2021
)
0.89
"The rationale of the study was to explore polymorphisms in tacrolimus and mycophenolate metabolic pathways that influence the adverse clinical outcomes in renal transplant recipients."( Impact of Pharmacogenetic Determinants of Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate on Adverse Events in Renal Transplant Patients.
Kutala, VK; Raju, SB; Sreenu, B; Thishya, K, 2021
)
1.13
" CYP3A5 AG- and UGT1A9-440 CC-genotypes showed increased risk and ABCC 3972C>T CC-genotype showed protection against adverse events."( Impact of Pharmacogenetic Determinants of Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate on Adverse Events in Renal Transplant Patients.
Kutala, VK; Raju, SB; Sreenu, B; Thishya, K, 2021
)
0.89
"There are limited real-world data available regarding adverse events (AEs) of immunosuppressants."( Mtor inhibitors associated with higher cardiovascular adverse events-A large population database analysis.
Abagyan, R; Nguyen, VN; Tsunoda, SM, 2021
)
0.62
" For safe and socioeconomically efficient conversion of the innovator into a generic formulation, high- -quality data are necessary, in view of the different and country-specific comorbidities and pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients."( STABIL-study: The Course of Therapy, Safety and Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Conversion of Prograf® to Tacrolimus HEXAL®/Crilomus® in Renal Transplant Recipients - an Observational Study in Germany.
Budde, K; Dienes, K; Halleck, F; Kalb, K; Lehner, LJ; Pein, U; Roehle, R; Schenker, P; Seeger, W; Weigand, K, 2021
)
0.84
"In conclusion, conversion to the generic tacrolimus formulation can be considered safe and feasible in long-term kidney transplant recipients in Germany."( STABIL-study: The Course of Therapy, Safety and Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Conversion of Prograf® to Tacrolimus HEXAL®/Crilomus® in Renal Transplant Recipients - an Observational Study in Germany.
Budde, K; Dienes, K; Halleck, F; Kalb, K; Lehner, LJ; Pein, U; Roehle, R; Schenker, P; Seeger, W; Weigand, K, 2021
)
1.1
" The proportion of patients with at least one adverse event related to the immunosuppression scheme with tacrolimus associated with MMF was 39."( Safety and effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil associated with tacrolimus for liver transplantation immunosuppression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Andraus, W; Bernardo, WM; Carneiro-D'Albuquerque, LA; Coelho, FF; Ernani, L; Fernandes, FA; Herman, P; Miranda Neto, AA; Nacif, LS; Silva, MBBE; Silveira Júnior, S; Tustumi, F, 2021
)
1.07
" Activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and associated inflammations may exacerbate the toxic effects of tacrolimus."( Evaluation of the Effect of Captopril and Losartan on Tacrolimus-induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats.
Abeyat, H; Behmanesh, MA; Poormoosavi, SM; Sangtarash, E, 2021
)
1.08
" The etiology of this adverse effect is complex, and effective therapeutic interventions remain to be determined."( Bioenergetic maladaptation and release of HMGB1 in calcineurin inhibitor-mediated nephrotoxicity.
Becker, EJ; Benavides, GA; Darley-Usmar, V; Mannon, RB; Zmijewska, AA; Zmijewski, JW, 2021
)
0.62
"To classify the most common adverse reactions associated with dupilumab treatment in patients with AD."( Retrospective analysis of adverse events with dupilumab reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration.
Jorizzo, JL; Wang, Y, 2021
)
0.62
"The United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting (FAERS) database was analyzed for common adverse reactions associated with dupilumab, topical pimecrolimus, and topical tacrolimus."( Retrospective analysis of adverse events with dupilumab reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration.
Jorizzo, JL; Wang, Y, 2021
)
0.81
"The most common adverse reaction associated with dupilumab was ocular complications."( Retrospective analysis of adverse events with dupilumab reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration.
Jorizzo, JL; Wang, Y, 2021
)
0.62
" Adverse effects are reported by patients, health care providers, and pharmaceutical companies, they have not been corroborated."( Retrospective analysis of adverse events with dupilumab reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration.
Jorizzo, JL; Wang, Y, 2021
)
0.62
" Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar in patients who converted to LCPT and in those who remained on IR-Tac."( Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily LCP-Tacrolimus Versus Twice-Daily Immediate-Release Tacrolimus in Adult Hispanic Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients: Sub-Group Analysis from a Phase 3 Trial.
Akkina, S; Bunnapradist, S; Faravardeh, A; Guerra, G; Meier-Kriesche, U; Moten, MA; Patel, SJ; Stevens, DR; Villicana, R, 2021
)
0.89
" Erythromycin is associated with adverse reactions, including corrected QT interval prolongation and cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme inhibition."( Safe Use of Erythromycin For Refractory Gastroparesis After Small Bowel Transplantation.
Cruz, RJ; Humar, A; Poloyac, K; Roberts, M; Stein, W, 2022
)
0.72
" None of the patients experienced severe adverse effects."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as long-term monotherapy for myasthenia gravis.
Fujita, K; Iida, S; Itani, K; Kaneko, S; Kunieda, T; Kusaka, H; Morise, S; Murakami, A; Nakamura, M; Takenouchi, N; Wate, R; Yakushiji, Y, 2021
)
0.93
"Sublingual tacrolimus use in pancreas transplant patients appears to be a safe and effective strategy to avoid oral or intravenous therapy in the perioperative period and may reduce the time to achieve therapeutic levels."( Safety and Efficacy of Perioperative Sublingual Tacrolimus in Pancreas Transplant Compared With Oral Tacrolimus.
Gonzales, H; Kalbavi, V; Patel, N; Perez, C; Rohan, V; Taber, DJ, 2021
)
1.27
" Identification of high-risk patients for CNI nephrotoxicity before renal transplantation enables better use and selection of immunosuppression with reduced adverse effects and, eventually, successful treatment of the kidney recipients."( Calcineurin Inhibitors Nephrotoxicity Prevention Strategies With Stress on Belatacept-Based Rescue Immunotherapy: A Review of the Current Evidence.
Abdulmalik, H; Al Faifi, IS; El Hennawy, HM; El Nazer, W; Fahmy, AE; Faifi, ASA; Kamal, A; Mahedy, A; Safar, O; Zaitoun, MF, 2021
)
0.62
"Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly anti-PD-1 antibody, have dramatically changed cancer treatment; however, fatal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can develop."( A case report on severe nivolumab-induced adverse events similar to primary sclerosing cholangitis refractory to immunosuppressive therapy.
Arai, J; Ariizumi, H; Hamada, K; Hirasawa, Y; Horiike, A; Imamura, CK; Ishida, H; Ishiguro, T; Iwamoto, S; Kiuchi, Y; Kobayashi, S; Kubota, Y; Matsui, H; Oguro, N; Ohkuma, R; Sakaki, M; Sambe, T; Shida, M; Shiozawa, E; Taniguchi, M; Tate, G; Tsunoda, T; Tsurutani, J; Uchida, N; Wada, S; Yoshimura, K, 2021
)
0.62
" However, tacrolimus may be more likely to cause mild adverse effects."( Efficacy and safety of topical administration of tacrolimus in oral lichen planus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Cheng, B; Hu, J; Su, Z; Tao, X, 2022
)
1.38
" Furthermore, the adverse effects of tacrolimus were minor and transient and did not affect tacrolimus' continued application."( Efficacy and safety of topical administration of tacrolimus in oral lichen planus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Cheng, B; Hu, J; Su, Z; Tao, X, 2022
)
1.25
" Thus, tacrolimus ointment combined with dupilumab is an effective and safe treatment option for facial AD."( Effectiveness and safety of tacrolimus ointment combined with dupilumab for patients with atopic dermatitis in real-world clinical practice.
Imai, Y; Inoue, Y; Kanazawa, N; Matsutani, M; Nakatani-Kusakabe, M; Natsuaki, M; Yamanishi, K, 2021
)
1.37
" TAC monotherapy had a higher CR in the early stage and had fewer drug-related adverse effects."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy versus cyclophosphamide-corticosteroid combination therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis.
Ding, L; Gong, L; Jiang, W; Lu, J; Qian, X; Tang, W; Xie, F; Xu, M; Xu, W, 2021
)
0.93
" The incidence of adverse reactions in the TA + tripterygium glycosides group was lower in the control and TA groups."( Effect and safety evaluation of tacrolimus and tripterygium glycosides combined therapy in treatment of Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis.
Li, X; Ran, F; Xu, H; Zhang, H; Zhao, G, 2021
)
0.9
" The purpose of this study was to clarify the adverse events associated with tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation using a spontaneous reporting system database."( Current status of adverse event profile of tacrolimus in patients with solid organ transplantation from a pharmacovigilance study.
Hosohata, K; Inada, A; Kambara, H; Niinomi, I; Oyama, S; Wakabayashi, T, 2021
)
1.11
"We performed a retrospective pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database."( Current status of adverse event profile of tacrolimus in patients with solid organ transplantation from a pharmacovigilance study.
Hosohata, K; Inada, A; Kambara, H; Niinomi, I; Oyama, S; Wakabayashi, T, 2021
)
0.88
"It was suggested that there is a diversity in the strength of the association between tacrolimus and adverse events in patients receiving heart, kidney, and liver transplantation."( Current status of adverse event profile of tacrolimus in patients with solid organ transplantation from a pharmacovigilance study.
Hosohata, K; Inada, A; Kambara, H; Niinomi, I; Oyama, S; Wakabayashi, T, 2021
)
1.11
" However, tacrolimus + MMF did pose a greater risk of serious adverse events than monotherapy."( A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness and safety of voclosporin or tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil as induction treatment for lupus nephritis.
Lee, YH; Song, GG, 2023
)
1.52
" We prospectively analyzed graft function, drug compliance, and adverse reactions after switching regimen for 24 weeks."( Efficacy and Safety Evaluation After Conversion From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Stable Liver Transplant Recipients: A Phase 4, Open-Label, Single-Center Study.
Cho, HD; Hwang, S; Jung, DH; Kang, WH; Kim, KH; Kim, M; Kim, SH; Kim, SM; Lee, SG; Moon, DB; Na, BG; Park, GC; Song, GW; Yang, G; Yoon, YI, 2021
)
0.85
" There were 37 adverse reactions after conversion; most of them were mild, and thrombocytopenia developed in 1 patient as an adverse drug response."( Efficacy and Safety Evaluation After Conversion From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Stable Liver Transplant Recipients: A Phase 4, Open-Label, Single-Center Study.
Cho, HD; Hwang, S; Jung, DH; Kang, WH; Kim, KH; Kim, M; Kim, SH; Kim, SM; Lee, SG; Moon, DB; Na, BG; Park, GC; Song, GW; Yang, G; Yoon, YI, 2021
)
0.85
"The conversion to once-daily tacrolimus in stable liver transplant recipients is an effective and safe therapeutic strategy improving drug compliance."( Efficacy and Safety Evaluation After Conversion From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Stable Liver Transplant Recipients: A Phase 4, Open-Label, Single-Center Study.
Cho, HD; Hwang, S; Jung, DH; Kang, WH; Kim, KH; Kim, M; Kim, SH; Kim, SM; Lee, SG; Moon, DB; Na, BG; Park, GC; Song, GW; Yang, G; Yoon, YI, 2021
)
1.14
" In general, adverse events of tacrolimus occur more often as the concentration of tacrolimus in the blood increases."( Tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity from bipolar disorder to status epilepticus under the therapeutic serum level: a case report.
Cheon, SM; Jin, B; Kim, GY, 2021
)
2.35
"1%) and topical corticosteroids (mild and moderate potency) are safe to use in young children with moderate to severe AD, and have comparable efficacy and safety profiles."( Safety of tacrolimus 0.03% and 0.1% ointments in young children with atopic dermatitis: a 36-month follow-up study.
Mäkelä, M; Pelkonen, A; Perälä, M; Remitz, A; Salava, A, 2022
)
1.12
" Therefore, administration of xanthenone along with tacrolimus could be a promising therapeutic strategy to reduce the adverse effects and increase the tolerability to tacrolimus immunosuppressive therapy."( Impact of the ACE2 activator xanthenone on tacrolimus nephrotoxicity: Modulation of uric acid/ERK/p38 MAPK and Nrf2/SOD3/GCLC signaling pathways.
Ali, FEM; Azouz, AA; Hersi, F; Hussein Elkelawy, AMM; Omar, HA, 2022
)
1.23
" The levels of satisfaction from treatment and any adverse effects (AEs) were also assessed in both groups."( The efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus 1% cream vs. sertaconazole 2% cream in the treatment of patients with facial seborrhoeic dermatitis: a randomized blinded trial.
Azizzadeh, M; Bagheri, B; Pahlevan, D, 2022
)
0.72
"Neurotoxicity secondary to anticalcineurinics is a prevalent side effect in transplant recipients."( Assessment of Tacrolimus Neurotoxicity Measured by Retinal OCT.
Cordoba Herrera, C; Facundo Molas, C; Fayos de Arizon, L; Guirado Perich, L; Mousavi Ahmadian, K; Perez Mir, M; Serra Cabañas, N,
)
0.49
" The relapse rate, no response rate, change in estimate of the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and overall incidence of adverse reactions showed no significant difference between TAC combined with corticosteroids group and control group."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Li, Y; Tian, Z; Xie, Y; Xu, J; Yang, Y, 2022
)
1.03
" However, it is unclear whether the combination of these two drugs causes additive or synergistic adverse drug reactions."( Signal of safety due to adverse drug reactions induced by tacrolimus with or without azithromycin.
Sunaga, T; Yonezawa, R, 2022
)
0.97
"Data from the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System from 1974 to Q3/2021 were used."( Signal of safety due to adverse drug reactions induced by tacrolimus with or without azithromycin.
Sunaga, T; Yonezawa, R, 2022
)
0.97
" Major adverse events were respiratory and urinary infections, with MMF having the highest infection rate."( Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus in the Treatment of Pediatric Henoch-Schönlein Purpura Nephritis.
Ma, R; Wang, X; Wu, D; Yang, Y, 2022
)
1.03
" Our findings suggest that both treatments are safe and the combination of tacrolimus and 308-nm EL is more effective than 308-nm EL alone for periocular vitiligo."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 308-nm excimer laser as monotherapy and combination therapy with topical tacrolimus in the treatment of periocular vitiligo.
Chen, S; Gao, Y; Jin, W; Lu, Y; Wu, J; Zhou, F, 2022
)
1.16
" 13 (33%) of 39 patients reported adverse events; transitory mild burning or pruritus (grade 1) was the most common, seen in eight (21%) patients."( Activity and safety of topical pimecrolimus in patients with early stage mycosis fungoides (PimTo-MF): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial.
de la Cámara, AG; de la Cruz, J; Estrach, T; Fernández-de-Misa, R; Gallardo, F; García-Díaz, N; Jiménez, B; Lora, D; Maroñas Jiménez, L; Muniesa, C; Ortiz-Romero, PL; Pedro Vaqué, J; Piris Pinilla, MÁ; Postigo, C; Riveiro-Falkenbach, E; Rodríguez Peralto, JL; Sánchez-Beato, M; Sanmartín, O; Servitje, O; Vega, R, 2022
)
0.72
"Pimecrolimus 1% cream seems active and safe in patients with early stage mycosis fungoides."( Activity and safety of topical pimecrolimus in patients with early stage mycosis fungoides (PimTo-MF): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial.
de la Cámara, AG; de la Cruz, J; Estrach, T; Fernández-de-Misa, R; Gallardo, F; García-Díaz, N; Jiménez, B; Lora, D; Maroñas Jiménez, L; Muniesa, C; Ortiz-Romero, PL; Pedro Vaqué, J; Piris Pinilla, MÁ; Postigo, C; Riveiro-Falkenbach, E; Rodríguez Peralto, JL; Sánchez-Beato, M; Sanmartín, O; Servitje, O; Vega, R, 2022
)
0.72
" The safety endpoints were the incidence of HBV virologic breakthrough and adverse events."( The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus and entecavir combination therapy in the treatment of hepatitis B virus-associated glomerulonephritis: a multi-center, placebo controlled, and single-blind randomized trial.
Hou, JH; Li, RZ; Li, ZL; Liu, DL; Xie, BY; Xie, XF; Xu, LX; Ye, ZM; Zhang, L; Zhang, WH, 2022
)
1.02
" In conclusion, these results suggest that tacrolimus translocation into the brain and neuronal damage in the cerebral cortex and CA1 are the underlying mechanisms of tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity and that ibudilast could be a protective agent against this adverse event."( Neuroprotective effects of ibudilast against tacrolimus induced neurotoxicity.
Egashira, N; Fu, R; Hirota, T; Ieiri, I; Matsukane, R; Tsuchiya, Y; Yamamoto, S; Zhang, W, 2022
)
1.24
" TTO did not induce any adverse reactions."( Preclinical safety of tetrahydrocurcumin loaded lipidic nanoparticles incorporated into tacrolimus ointment: In vitro and in vivo evaluation.
Arora, C; Chitkara, D; Kakkar, V; Saini, K; Saini, M; Sharma, S, 2022
)
0.94
" Four patients discontinued treatment due to insufficient response or adverse events."( Effect and safety profile of belimumab and tacrolimus combination therapy in thirty-three patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Fukui, S; Ikeda, Y; Kidoguchi, G; Kishimoto, M; Kitada, A; Nakai, T; Nomura, A; Okada, M; Tamaki, H, 2022
)
0.98
" The primary endpoint was 12-month survival rate and the secondary endpoints included respiratory-related events, adverse events, exacerbation in HRCT findings and laboratory parameters during therapy courses, and changes in respiratory function."( The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus on top of glucocorticoids in the management of IIM-ILD: A retrospective and prospective study.
Bai, Z; Chen, Y; Dong, L; Hu, Q; Zhang, Z; Zhong, J, 2022
)
1.02
" The incidence rate of drug-associated adverse events (AEs) was comparable between two groups and none of the patients discontinued the treatment due to severe AEs."( The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus on top of glucocorticoids in the management of IIM-ILD: A retrospective and prospective study.
Bai, Z; Chen, Y; Dong, L; Hu, Q; Zhang, Z; Zhong, J, 2022
)
1.02
"Neurotoxicity, including optic nerve injury, is one of the most common adverse effects of tacrolimus, the principal calcineurin inhibitor used after kidney transplantation (KTx)."( Visual evoked potentials as a method for the prospective assessment of tacrolimus neurotoxicity in patients after kidney transplantation.
Kolonko, A; Pojda-Wilczek, D; Sirek, S, 2022
)
1.18
" Safety outcomes included the rates of treatment-emergent adverse events and premature isavuconazole discontinuation."( Isavuconazole for the Treatment of Invasive Mold Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Study on Efficacy and Safety in Real-life Clinical Practice.
Aguado, JM; Bodro, M; Carratalà, J; Cordero, E; Fariñas, MDC; Fernández-Ruiz, M; Fortún, J; Goikoetxea, J; Gutiérrez Martín, I; Illaro, A; López-Viñau, T; Moreno, A; Muñoz, P; Ramos-Martínez, A; Rodriguez-Álvarez, R; Ruiz-Ruigómez, M; Sabé, N; Salto-Alejandre, S; Valerio, M; Vidal, E, 2023
)
0.91
" At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in 17."( Isavuconazole for the Treatment of Invasive Mold Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Study on Efficacy and Safety in Real-life Clinical Practice.
Aguado, JM; Bodro, M; Carratalà, J; Cordero, E; Fariñas, MDC; Fernández-Ruiz, M; Fortún, J; Goikoetxea, J; Gutiérrez Martín, I; Illaro, A; López-Viñau, T; Moreno, A; Muñoz, P; Ramos-Martínez, A; Rodriguez-Álvarez, R; Ruiz-Ruigómez, M; Sabé, N; Salto-Alejandre, S; Valerio, M; Vidal, E, 2023
)
0.91
"Isavuconazole is a safe therapeutic option for IMD in SOT recipients, with efficacy comparable to other patient groups."( Isavuconazole for the Treatment of Invasive Mold Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Study on Efficacy and Safety in Real-life Clinical Practice.
Aguado, JM; Bodro, M; Carratalà, J; Cordero, E; Fariñas, MDC; Fernández-Ruiz, M; Fortún, J; Goikoetxea, J; Gutiérrez Martín, I; Illaro, A; López-Viñau, T; Moreno, A; Muñoz, P; Ramos-Martínez, A; Rodriguez-Álvarez, R; Ruiz-Ruigómez, M; Sabé, N; Salto-Alejandre, S; Valerio, M; Vidal, E, 2023
)
0.91
" No organic stenosis of the renal artery was detected on the kidney magnetic resonance angiography, and the patient was discharged on POD 51, without any other adverse events, including rejection."( Acute Calcineurin Inhibitor Nephrotoxicity Diagnosed Using Kidney Doppler Ultrasonography After Heart Transplant: A Case Report.
Fujita, T; Fukushima, S; Hada, T; Mochizuki, H; Seguchi, O; Tsukamoto, Y; Watanabe, T; Yoshihara, F, 2022
)
0.72
" However, its therapeutic index is narrow, and it is prone to adverse side effects, along with an increased risk of toxicity, namely, cardio-, nephro-, hepato-, and neurotoxicity."( The effect of tacrolimus-induced toxicity on metabolic profiling in target tissues of mice.
Dang, R; Guo, J; Han, W; Li, Y; Meng, J; Si, Q; Wang, S; Wei, N; Wu, L; Xie, D, 2022
)
1.08
"Tacrolimus (FK506) is an immunosuppressive agent and has toxic side effects such as nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and neurotoxicity."( Protective effect of silymarin on tacrolimus-induced kidney and liver toxicity.
Ciftci, MK; Terzi, F, 2022
)
2.44
" Although tacrolimus has been reported to cause adverse events, such as increased blood pressure, abnormal glucose metabolism, and susceptibility to infection, there have been no studies on the impact of tacrolimus in SLE pregnancies at these points."( Safety of tacrolimus use during pregnancy and related pregnancy outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A retrospective single-center analysis in Japan.
Fukui, S; Kitada, A; Kusaoi, M; Nakai, T; Okada, M; Rokutanda, R; Tamura, N; Yamaji, K, 2023
)
1.72
" We defined overall adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) as follows: (1) fetal death after 10 gestational weeks, (2) preterm delivery, (3) delivery due to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preeclampsia, or placental insufficiency, or (4) the diagnosis of small for gestational age infants."( Safety of tacrolimus use during pregnancy and related pregnancy outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A retrospective single-center analysis in Japan.
Fukui, S; Kitada, A; Kusaoi, M; Nakai, T; Okada, M; Rokutanda, R; Tamura, N; Yamaji, K, 2023
)
1.31
"Both prolonged-release formulations of tacrolimus are safe and effective in immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients."( Real-life comparison of efficacy and safety profiles of two prolonged-release tacrolimus formulations in de novo kidney transplant recipients: 24 months of follow-up.
Baczkowska, T; Czarnecka, K; Czarnecka, P; Durlik, M; Lagiewska, B, 2023
)
1.41
" The incidence of adverse events including infection and renal dysfunction showed no significant differences between the tacrolimus therapy group and conventional therapy group."( The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Liao, J; Liu, J; Peng, X; Wang, J; Xie, X, 2023
)
1.42
" The adverse effect profile of tacrolimus is yet to be completely understood."( Adverse Effects of Tacrolimus and Its Associated Risk Factors in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Manikandan, S; Meera, M; Parameswaran, S, 2023
)
1.52
" The blood sugar levels (fasting and postprandial) were monitored, and patients were asked regularly about the adverse effects of tacrolimus experienced by them for 6 months posttransplant."( Adverse Effects of Tacrolimus and Its Associated Risk Factors in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Manikandan, S; Meera, M; Parameswaran, S, 2023
)
1.44
" Other adverse effects observed included tremors, diarrhea, alopecia, cyto- megalovirus infection, headache, biopsy-proven calci- neurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, peripheral neuropathy, and BK virus infection."( Adverse Effects of Tacrolimus and Its Associated Risk Factors in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Manikandan, S; Meera, M; Parameswaran, S, 2023
)
1.24
"Posttransplant diabetes mellitus is a common adverse effect of tacrolimus among renal transplant recipients."( Adverse Effects of Tacrolimus and Its Associated Risk Factors in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Manikandan, S; Meera, M; Parameswaran, S, 2023
)
1.48
" The incidences of serious adverse events were 25."( A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus and Corticosteroids in Combination With or Without Mycophenolate Mofetil in Liver Transplantation Recipients Infected With Hepatitis B Virus.
Choi, NG; Choi, ST; Chu, CW; Chung, YK; Ha, TY; Hwang, S; Jung, BH; Jung, DH; Kim, KK; Lee, SG; Moon, DB; Park, JI; Ryu, JH; Shin, MH; Song, GW; Yang, K; Yoon, YI, 2023
)
1.14
"Although the study involved a small number of patients, the triple-drug regimen can be considered safe and effective for immunosuppression after living donor liver transplantation in patients infected with HBV."( A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus and Corticosteroids in Combination With or Without Mycophenolate Mofetil in Liver Transplantation Recipients Infected With Hepatitis B Virus.
Choi, NG; Choi, ST; Chu, CW; Chung, YK; Ha, TY; Hwang, S; Jung, BH; Jung, DH; Kim, KK; Lee, SG; Moon, DB; Park, JI; Ryu, JH; Shin, MH; Song, GW; Yang, K; Yoon, YI, 2023
)
1.14
"We set out to use machine learning algorithms (MLAs) to identify variables that predict the therapeutic effects and adverse events following tacrolimus and cyclosporine administration in renal transplant patients."( Developing supervised machine learning algorithms to evaluate the therapeutic effect and laboratory-related adverse events of cyclosporine and tacrolimus in renal transplants.
Shah, S; Sridharan, K, 2023
)
1.31
"Tacrolimus is a powerful macrolide calcineurin inhibitor that has low adverse effects which lead to a rapid response in the control of signs and symptoms in comparison to that of corticosteroids in Oral Lichen Planus(OLP)."( Efficacy and Safety of Topical Tacrolimus in Comparison with Topical Corticosteroids, Calcineurin Inhibitors, Retinoids and Placebo in Oral Lichen Planus: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bhor, K; Manoj, R; Pinto, J; Samson, S; Santosh, V; Waghmare, M, 2023
)
2.64
" The results revealed no significant difference in clinical resolution and adverse effects between tacrolimus and corticosteroids."( Efficacy and Safety of Topical Tacrolimus in Comparison with Topical Corticosteroids, Calcineurin Inhibitors, Retinoids and Placebo in Oral Lichen Planus: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bhor, K; Manoj, R; Pinto, J; Samson, S; Santosh, V; Waghmare, M, 2023
)
1.41
" Secondary outcomes included incidences of infection, hypertension, diabetes, other serious adverse events (AEs), hospitalization, and death."( Comparative safety of generic versus brand calcineurin inhibitors in solid organ transplant patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Qian, J; Tanni, KA,
)
0.13
"There is an urgent need for safe and targeted interventions to mitigate post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP)."( Preclinical safety evaluation of calcineurin inhibitors delivered through an intraductal route to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis demonstrates endocrine and systemic safety.
Azar, PRS; Barakat, MT; Bottino, R; Ding, Y; Husain, SZ; Jayaraman, T; Khalid, A; Lin, YC; Murayi, JA; Ni, J; Papachristou, GI; Poropatich, R; Swaminathan, G; Tsai, CY; Wang, J; Wen, L; Yu, M, 2023
)
0.91
"Intraductal delivery of RC-CnI formulation was safe and well-tolerated with no significant acute or subacute endocrine or systemic toxicities, underscoring its clinical utility to prevent PEP."( Preclinical safety evaluation of calcineurin inhibitors delivered through an intraductal route to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis demonstrates endocrine and systemic safety.
Azar, PRS; Barakat, MT; Bottino, R; Ding, Y; Husain, SZ; Jayaraman, T; Khalid, A; Lin, YC; Murayi, JA; Ni, J; Papachristou, GI; Poropatich, R; Swaminathan, G; Tsai, CY; Wang, J; Wen, L; Yu, M, 2023
)
0.91
" This systematic review is intended to synthesize the clinical trial literature and concisely report the updated safety and adverse effects of topical medications used to treat atopic dermatitis in children."( Safety of topical medications in the management of paediatric atopic dermatitis: An updated systematic review.
Hwang, A; Lio, P; Miller, C; Zhao, S, 2023
)
0.91
" Safety data was well reported in tacrolimus trials with the most frequently reported adverse events being burning sensation, pruritus and cutaneous infections."( Safety of topical medications in the management of paediatric atopic dermatitis: An updated systematic review.
Hwang, A; Lio, P; Miller, C; Zhao, S, 2023
)
1.19
"Data discussed here support the use of steroid-sparing medications (tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, crisaborole, delgocitinib) as safe options with minimal adverse events for managing paediatric AD, although a larger number of TCI studies reported burning and pruritus compared to TCS studies."( Safety of topical medications in the management of paediatric atopic dermatitis: An updated systematic review.
Hwang, A; Lio, P; Miller, C; Zhao, S, 2023
)
1.15
" However, CyA greatly increases the plasma concentration of AT; therefore, concomitant use might increase the frequency of statin-induced adverse effects."( Safety Profile of the Concomitant Use of Atorvastatin and Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Harabayashi, R; Nagayama, K; Nakamura, Y; Sugimoto, T; Takahashi, K; Takahashi, M; Uchida, J, 2023
)
0.91
"Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) remain a prevalent and common sequelae of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, often necessitating treatment interruption and prolonged immune suppression."( Detection of novel therapies using a multi-national, multi-institutional registry of cutaneous immune-related adverse events and management.
Baumrin, E; Cardones, AR; Carlesimo, M; Caro, G; Chen, ST; Dulmage, BO; Freites-Martinez, A; Hirner, JP; Kaffenberger, BH; Markova, A; McLellan, BN; Mital, R; Otto, TS; Owen, DH; Rossi, A; Sauder, MB; Savu, A; Seminario-Vidal, L; Sibaud, V, 2023
)
0.91
" No serious adverse events were reported."( Detection of novel therapies using a multi-national, multi-institutional registry of cutaneous immune-related adverse events and management.
Baumrin, E; Cardones, AR; Carlesimo, M; Caro, G; Chen, ST; Dulmage, BO; Freites-Martinez, A; Hirner, JP; Kaffenberger, BH; Markova, A; McLellan, BN; Mital, R; Otto, TS; Owen, DH; Rossi, A; Sauder, MB; Savu, A; Seminario-Vidal, L; Sibaud, V, 2023
)
0.91
"Conversion to OD-TAC in pediatric LT recipients with stable graft function is safe and effective."( Safety and Efficacy of Conversion to Once-Daily Tacrolimus from Twice-Daily Tacrolimus in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients.
An, S; Choi, GS; Joh, JW; Kim, JM; Lee, S; Rhu, J, 2023
)
1.17
" This study elucidated the molecular processes underlying the toxic effects of TAC using an integrative omics approach."( Pathway-level multi-omics analysis of the molecular mechanisms underlying the toxicity of long-term tacrolimus exposure.
Cho, YS; Kim, DH; Long, NP; Moon, KS; Oh, JH; Park, SM; Phat, NK; Shin, JG; Thu, VTA; Yen, NTH, 2023
)
1.13
" In addition, the risk of graft failure, death, and adverse events in the first year was similar for the once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus groups."( Efficacy and safety of once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus versus twice-daily tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
Chen, CF; Chen, HA; Hsueh, KC; Huang, KH; Sun, SH; Tam, KW; Tung, MC; Wang, CY; Wang, TS; Wang, YH, 2023
)
1.37
" We compared 6-month colectomy rates, time to colectomy, improvement in disease activity indices, and adverse effects."( Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus or Infliximab Therapy in Children and Young Adults With Acute Severe Colitis.
Ajithkumar, A; Bogursky, A; Bousvaros, A; Lillehei, C; Liu, E; Manokaran, K; Rufo, PA; Spaan, J; Weil, BR; Weinbren, N; Zalieckas, JM; Zimmerman, LA, 2023
)
1.22
" The types of adverse effects differed by therapy."( Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus or Infliximab Therapy in Children and Young Adults With Acute Severe Colitis.
Ajithkumar, A; Bogursky, A; Bousvaros, A; Lillehei, C; Liu, E; Manokaran, K; Rufo, PA; Spaan, J; Weil, BR; Weinbren, N; Zalieckas, JM; Zimmerman, LA, 2023
)
1.22
" In terms of adverse effects, there was no significant difference between the level of eGFR before and after multi-target therapy."( Efficacy and safety of multi-target therapy in children with lupus nephritis.
Chen, L; Cheng, C; Jiang, X; Mo, Y; Ouyang, X; Rong, L; Zheng, X, 2023
)
0.91
"Multi-target therapy could be an effective treatment option with minimal adverse effects for LN children who are refractory to initial first-line induction therapies or had combined proliferative and membranous LN."( Efficacy and safety of multi-target therapy in children with lupus nephritis.
Chen, L; Cheng, C; Jiang, X; Mo, Y; Ouyang, X; Rong, L; Zheng, X, 2023
)
0.91
" Adverse effects of multi-target therapy were infrequent and minimal that can be improved by symptomatic therapy."( Efficacy and safety of multi-target therapy in children with lupus nephritis.
Chen, L; Cheng, C; Jiang, X; Mo, Y; Ouyang, X; Rong, L; Zheng, X, 2023
)
0.91
"Rivaroxaban may be a safe and effective alternative in LDLT recipients with no significant adverse incidents."( Exploring safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban after living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective study.
Dar, FS; Khalid, A; Khan, BA; Khan, MY; Naveed, A; Rashid, S; Saeed, Z, 2023
)
0.91
" Therefore, the competition for CYP3A4 may affect the metabolism of tacrolimus and result in its increased plasma concentrations, as well as in adverse reactions."( Safety analysis of co-administering tacrolimus and omeprazole in renal transplant recipients - A review.
Idasiak-Piechocka, I; Miedziaszczyk, M, 2023
)
1.42
"A course of tacrolimus of more than one year was effective and well-tolerated in young children with MG, and tacrolimus improved MG symptoms and reduced the dose and adverse events of oral prednisone."( Long-term efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in young children with myasthenia gravis.
Li, W; Zhang, L; Zhang, M; Zhang, Y; Zhou, S, 2023
)
1.57
" Clinical efficacy and adverse reactions were primary clinical endpoints."( Efficacy and safety of dupilumab plus topical tacrolimus for atopic dermatitis in 6- to 12-year-old patients.
Chen, JG; Chen, M; Gao, SS; Wang, R, 2023
)
1.17
" The absence of a significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups suggested a high safety profile of dupilumab."( Efficacy and safety of dupilumab plus topical tacrolimus for atopic dermatitis in 6- to 12-year-old patients.
Chen, JG; Chen, M; Gao, SS; Wang, R, 2023
)
1.17
" This treatment protocol effectively alleviates symptoms, enhances the quality of life of patients, and shows no increased risk of adverse reactions."( Efficacy and safety of dupilumab plus topical tacrolimus for atopic dermatitis in 6- to 12-year-old patients.
Chen, JG; Chen, M; Gao, SS; Wang, R, 2023
)
1.17

Pharmacokinetics

The present study was designed to determine the pharmacokinetic profiles of a once-daily formulation of tacrolimus in patients before and after introduction of renal transplantation. The concentration measured 3 h postdose (C(3) was tightly correlated with the AUC(0-12) in b.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Rabbits are a good animal model for pharmacokinetic studies of these drugs."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of coadministration of methylprednisolone and tacrolimus in rabbits.
Chow, FS; Jusko, WJ; Piekoszewski, W, 1994
)
0.51
"8 (SD) and half-life averaged 12."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in liver transplant patients.
Hebert, MF; Jusko, WJ; Klintmalm, GB; Lee, CC; Mekki, QA; Piekoszewski, W; Piergies, AA; Schechter, P; Shaefer, MS, 1995
)
0.61
"This study provides pharmacokinetic guidelines for the use of tacrolimus in patients undergoing hepatic transplantation."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in liver transplant patients.
Hebert, MF; Jusko, WJ; Klintmalm, GB; Lee, CC; Mekki, QA; Piekoszewski, W; Piergies, AA; Schechter, P; Shaefer, MS, 1995
)
0.86
" The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of this drug and to see if trough level, which has been used widely in therapeutic drug monitoring, can be used as an appropriate substitute for other pharmacokinetic measurement tests."( Intra- and interindividual variation in the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (FK506) in kidney transplant recipients--importance of trough level as a practical indicator.
Ichikawa, Y; Ihara, H; Ikoma, F; Nagano, S; Nojima, M; Shinkuma, D, 1995
)
0.53
" Currently, most of the pharmacokinetic data available for tacrolimus are based on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method, which does not distinguish tacrolimus from its metabolites."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus.
Burckart, G; Jain, A; Lever, J; McMichael, J; Prasad, T; Starzl, T; Swaminathan, A; Venkataramanan, R; Warty, V; Zuckerman, S, 1995
)
0.83
" Immunoassays of low intra- and interday variability and high sensitivity are necessary to adequately characterize terminal elimination phase concentrations in pharmacokinetic studies."( Tacrolimus (FK506): validation of a sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit for and application to a clinical pharmacokinetic study.
Alak, A; Bekersky, I; Dressler, DE; Farmen, RH; Lee, JW; Sukovaty, RL, 1997
)
1.74
" Elimination was not influenced by dose, as shown by estimates of the terminal half-life of 63 hours (27."( Population pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in kidney transplant patients.
Ferron, GM; Jusko, WJ; Mishina, EV; Zimmerman, JJ, 1997
)
0.3
" No pharmacokinetic interaction was found between sirolimus and cyclosporine."( Population pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in kidney transplant patients.
Ferron, GM; Jusko, WJ; Mishina, EV; Zimmerman, JJ, 1997
)
0.3
" Since the liver and the spleen are primary components of the RES, and the brain and the kidney have a poor RES, we hypothesized that a W/O/W emulsion of tacrolimus would possess the pharmacokinetic benefits of local immunosuppression."( The pharmacokinetics of water-in-oil-in-water-type multiple emulsion of a new tacrolimus formulation.
Harada, Y; Hashimoto, H; Kazui, T; Kimura, T; Li, XK; Suzuki, Y; Uno, T; Yamaguchi, T, 1997
)
0.72
" Tacrolimus demonstrates considerable interindividual variation in its pharmacokinetic profile."( Measurement of tacrolimus (FK506) and its metabolites: a review of assay development and application in therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies.
Alak, AM, 1997
)
1.56
" Pharmacokinetic investigations were performed after establishing a stable maintenance dose with trough levels in the desired window of 5-12 ng/ml."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (FK 506) in children and adolescents with renal transplants.
Bauer, S; Ehrich, JH; Filler, G; Greiner, C; Grygas, R; Mai, I; Stolpe, HJ, 1997
)
0.62
" We recommend the performance of at least one pharmacokinetic study after establishing stable FK 506 trough levels to ascertain a safe profile."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (FK 506) in children and adolescents with renal transplants.
Bauer, S; Ehrich, JH; Filler, G; Greiner, C; Grygas, R; Mai, I; Stolpe, HJ, 1997
)
0.62
" With the expanded use of tacrolimus (Prograf) as well in renal transplant patients, there is a lack of pharmacokinetic studies clarifying drug interactions between the three agents."( Unexpected augmentation of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in combination therapy, and analogous in vitro findings.
Burke, G; Ciancio, G; de Faria, L; Esquenazi, V; Miller, J; Rosen, A; Roth, D; Tsaroucha, A; Tzakis, A; Zucker, K, 1997
)
0.81
" The mean terminal elimination half-life of tacrolimus was 18."( Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in BMT patients.
Antin, J; Bekersky, I; Boswell, GW; Fay, J; Fitzsimmons, W; Maher, R; Nash, R; Weisdorf, D; Wingard, J, 1998
)
2
" Whole blood samples for the intravenous pharmacokinetic profile were taken before initiation of the first infusion, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h post-infusion, and every 24 h thereafter until intravenous administration was discontinued."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (FK506) in paediatric liver transplant recipients.
Bernard, O; Clement De Clety, S; De Ville De Goyet, J; Firdaous, I; Furlan, V; Lykavieris, L; Möller, A; Otte, JB; Reding, R; Schäfer, A; Sokal, E; Stadler, P; Taburet, AM; Undre, NA; Van Leeuw, V; Wallemacq, PE,
)
0.45
" A pharmacokinetic interaction with rifampin, an antituberculosis agent and potent inducer of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein, and tacrolimus was evaluated in six healthy male volunteers."( Effects of rifampin on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.
Bekersky, I; Dressler, D; Fisher, RM; Hebert, MF; Marsh, CL, 1999
)
0.82
"We report pharmacokinetic data on tacrolimus in 14 heart transplant patients (2 women, 12 men)."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in heart transplant recipients.
Arbustini, E; Bascapè, V; Bellotti, E; Calvi, M; Martinelli, L; Molinaro, M; Pellegrini, C; Regazzi, MB; Rinaldi, M; Viganò, M, 1999
)
0.87
" Pharmacokinetic parameters of MPA estimated before and after clamping the t-tube were compared to evaluate any significant differences at a P of."( Effect of t-tube clamping on the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in liver transplant patients on oral therapy of mycophenolate mofetil.
Fung, JJ; Hamad, I; Jain, AB; Venkataramanan, R; Warty, VS; Zhang, S; Zuckerman, S, 1999
)
0.3
"A novel macromolecular prodrug of Tacrolimus (FK506), FK506-dextran conjugate, was developed and its physico-chemical, biological and pharmacokinetic characteristics were studied."( Synthesis and pharmacokinetics of a novel macromolecular prodrug of Tacrolimus (FK506), FK506-dextran conjugate.
Akamatsu, K; Hamashima, T; Hashida, M; Nishikawa, M; Takakura, Y; Yoshimura, N; Yura, H, 1999
)
0.82
" These pharmacokinetic alterations due to diltiazem contrasted with those seen in normal rats."( Role of diltiazem on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in tacrolimus-induced nephrotoxic rats.
Ito, K; Suzuki, T; Tada, H; Yanagiwara, S, 1999
)
0.62
" Pharmacokinetic profiles and biochemical studies were performed three times, in steady state, before, and after conversion."( Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine in stable renal transplant patients: safety, metabolic changes, and pharmacokinetic comparison.
Hart, P; Higgins, RM; Kashi, H; Lam, FT, 2000
)
0.65
" Pharmacokinetic profiles were measured before and after conversion, and showed that cyclosporine (Neoral) exhibited significantly less interpatient and intrapatient variability than tacrolimus, for area under the curve (AUC), maximum concentration after dose (Cmax), minimum concentration after dose (Cmin), and time to maximum concentration (Tmax)."( Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine in stable renal transplant patients: safety, metabolic changes, and pharmacokinetic comparison.
Hart, P; Higgins, RM; Kashi, H; Lam, FT, 2000
)
0.84
" Pharmacokinetic studies showed that cyclosporine in the form of Neoral exhibited less inter- and intrapatient variability than tacrolimus, although this is of uncertain clinical significance."( Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine in stable renal transplant patients: safety, metabolic changes, and pharmacokinetic comparison.
Hart, P; Higgins, RM; Kashi, H; Lam, FT, 2000
)
0.86
" Pharmacokinetic profiles were measured before and after conversion, and showed that cyclosporin (Neoral) exhibited significantly less interpatient and intrapatient variability than tacrolimus, for area under the curve (AUC), maximum concentration postdose (Cmax), minimum concentration postdose (Cmin), time to maximum concentration (Tmax)."( Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporin in stable renal transplant patients: safety, metabolic changes, and pharmacokinetic comparison.
Hart, P; Higgins, RM; Kashi, H; Lam, FT, 2000
)
0.84
" Pharmacokinetic studies showed cyclosporin in the form of Neoral showed less inter- and intrapatient variability than tacrolimus, although this is of uncertain clinical significance."( Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporin in stable renal transplant patients: safety, metabolic changes, and pharmacokinetic comparison.
Hart, P; Higgins, RM; Kashi, H; Lam, FT, 2000
)
0.86
" These novel techniques not only are illuminating the 'black box' that has obscured the pharmacodynamic effects of immunosuppressants but also are uncovering new mechanisms of action of these drugs."( Pharmacodynamics of immunosuppressive drugs.
Dambrin, C; Klupp, J; Morris, RE, 2000
)
0.31
"In this study, the estimates of the pharmacokinetic parameters of tacrolimus agreed with those obtained from conventional pharmacokinetic studies."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Asian paediatric liver transplant patients.
Aw, M; Chan, SY; Charles, BG; Ho, PC; Lim, SM; Quak, SH; Sam, WJ, 2000
)
0.83
"There were no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters among the three study groups after intravenous administration of the drugs."( The pharmacokinetics and metabolic disposition of tacrolimus: a comparison across ethnic groups.
Bekersky, I; Benet, LZ; Carrier, S; Christians, U; Dressler, D; Floren, LC; Frassetto, L; Mancinelli, LM, 2001
)
0.56
" This should be carefully taken into account when interpreting pharmacokinetic results for tacrolimus."( Comparative clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in paediatric and adult patients.
Verbeeck, RK; Wallemacq, PE, 2001
)
0.8
" In this study, we examined whether the absorptive barriers, multidrug resistance protein (MDR1), or cytochrome P450 IIIA4 (CYP3A4) are important pharmacokinetic factors for tacrolimus and are prognostic indicators for LDLT outcome."( Pharmacokinetic and prognostic significance of intestinal MDR1 expression in recipients of living-donor liver transplantation.
Hashida, T; Inui , K; Masuda, S; Saito, H; Tanaka, K; Uemoto, S, 2001
)
0.5
"The aim of this study was to investigate the population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplant recipients and to identify factors that may explain pharmacokinetic variability."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children who receive cut-down or full liver transplants.
Charles, BG; Lynch, SV; Staatz, CE; Taylor, PJ; Tett, SE; Willis, C, 2001
)
0.83
" Factors screened for influence on the pharmacokinetic parameters were weight, age, gender, postoperative day, days since commencing tacrolimus therapy, transplant type (whole child liver or cut-down adult liver), liver function tests (bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase [ALP], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], gamma-glutamyl transferase [GGT], alanine aminotransferase [ALT]), creatinine clearance, hematocrit, corticosteroid dose, and concurrent therapy with metabolic inducers and inhibitors of tacrolimus."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children who receive cut-down or full liver transplants.
Charles, BG; Lynch, SV; Staatz, CE; Taylor, PJ; Tett, SE; Willis, C, 2001
)
0.8
"Nonlinear mixed-effect modeling was useful for analysis of pharmacokinetic characteristics of tacrolimus in LDLT patients."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult recipients receiving living-donor liver transplantation.
Fukatsu, S; Hashida, T; Igarashi, T; Inui, K; Kiuchi, T; Saito, H; Takayanagi, K; Tanaka, K; Uemoto, S; Yano, I, 2001
)
0.82
" The purpose of this study was to describe tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic parameters, to identify relationships between clinical covariates and pharmacokinetic estimates, and to develop a model to predict tacrolimus clearance in HCT patients."( Factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (FK506) in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients.
Brundage, RC; Jacobson, P; Ng, J; Ratanatharathorn, V; Uberti, J, 2001
)
0.84
" Although the clinical pharmacokinetics of these drugs in paediatric transplant recipients are still under investigation, it is evident that the pharmacokinetic parameters observed in adults may not be applicable to children, especially in younger age groups."( Immunosuppressive therapy for paediatric transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations.
del Mar Fernández De Gatta, M; Domínguez-Gil, A; García, MJ; Santos-Buelga, D, 2002
)
0.31
" In the pharmacokinetic study, whole blood and ventricular FK506 concentrations were analyzed, using a 4-compartment model during and after intravenous infusion of FK506 (0."( Quantitative relationship between myocardial concentration of tacrolimus and QT prolongation in guinea pigs: pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model incorporating a site of adverse effect.
Iga, T; Minematsu, T; Ohtani, H; Sato, H; Sawada, Y; Yamada, Y, 2001
)
0.55
"The pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between tacrolimus (TAC) and sirolimus (SRL), similarly structured immunosuppressive compounds that share binding proteins, is unknown."( A clinical pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus and sirolimus combination immunosuppression comparing simultaneous to separated administration.
Fraser, A; MacDonald, AS; Mahalati, K; McAlister, VC; Peltekian, KM, 2002
)
0.85
"To study the dose-response relationship of the pharmacokinetic interaction between diltiazem and tacrolimus in kidney and liver transplant recipients."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and diltiazem: dose-response relationship in kidney and liver transplant recipients.
Jones, TE; Morris, RG, 2002
)
0.81
"Nonrandomised seven-period stepwise pharmacokinetic study."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and diltiazem: dose-response relationship in kidney and liver transplant recipients.
Jones, TE; Morris, RG, 2002
)
0.59
" Hence, diltiazem affects blood tacrolimus concentrations for longer than would be predicted from the half-life of diltiazem in plasma."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and diltiazem: dose-response relationship in kidney and liver transplant recipients.
Jones, TE; Morris, RG, 2002
)
0.87
"Tacrolimus concentrations were measured in blood samples obtained from 22 transplant recipients during the first week of transplant, within pharmacokinetic profiles, and throughout the first 6 months post-transplant, using the Pro Tac II ELISA method."( The impact of ethnic miscegenation on tacrolimus clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring.
da Silva Moreira, SR; Felipe, CR; Garcia, R; Machado, PG; Pestana, JO; Silva, HT, 2002
)
2.03
"Current data indicate that pharmacokinetic (PK) monitoring of cyclosporin microemulsion (CsA) should be performed using the 2-h concentration (C2), that tacrolimus (Tac) is commonly monitored using the trough level, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) should be monitored using the 1-h (C1), 2-h (C2) and 6-h (C6) concentrations."( Universal approach to pharmacokinetic monitoring of immunosuppressive agents in children.
Feber, J; Filler, G; Lepage, N; Mai, I; Weiler, G, 2002
)
0.51
"Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM and P-PHARM on retrospective data from 35 paediatric liver-transplant patients receiving tacrolimus therapy."( Comparison of two population pharmacokinetic programs, NONMEM and P-PHARM, for tacrolimus.
Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2002
)
0.74
" The aim of this study is to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in adult liver transplant recipients and test this model in individualizing therapy."( Toward better outcomes with tacrolimus therapy: population pharmacokinetics and individualized dosage prediction in adult liver transplantation.
Lynch, SV; Staatz, CE; Taylor, PJ; Tett, SE; Willis, C, 2003
)
0.84
" MPA pharmacokinetic profiles were determined in 21 liver transplant recipients (age, 2 to 15 years; 12 boys) administered mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for at least 6 months."( Mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
Adams, JE; Aw, MM; Brown, NW; Dhawan, A; Gonde, CE; Heaton, ND; Itsuka, T; Mieli-Vergani, G; Tredger, JM, 2003
)
0.32
" In contrast, there is no pharmacokinetic interaction between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus-based combination therapies.
Undre, NA, 2003
)
0.86
" It is often assumed that the diverse dosing contributes to the observed pharmacokinetic differences between the two drugs."( Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and cyclosporine at equivalent molecular doses.
Højskov, C; Jørgensen, KA; Karamperis, N; Pedersen, AR; Poulsen, JH; Povlsen, JV, 2003
)
0.59
" This long-term pharmacokinetic study has shown that when sirolimus is combined with tacrolimus, dose changes of sirolimus are reflected by pharmacokinetic exposure parameters."( Long-term pharmacokinetic study of the novel combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus in de novo renal allograft recipients.
Claes, K; Evenepoel, P; Kuypers, DR; Maes, B; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2003
)
0.79
" A slight delay in mean residence time (MRT0-12) and time to the peak concentration (tmax) was found after night doses, but there was no statistical significance."( Chronopharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: occurrence of acute rejection.
Hayase, Y; Iinuma, M; Kato, T; Murakami, M; Satoh, S; Shimoda, N; Suzuki, T; Tada, H, 2003
)
0.62
" Twenty-five full pharmacokinetic studies were performed in 22 heart transplant patients (11 men and 7 women) at less than 1 year posttransplant."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in heart transplantation: new strategies of monitoring.
Arizón del Prado, JM; Aumente Rubio, MD; Cárdenas Aranzana, M; López Granados, A; López Malo de Molina, MD; Mesa Rubio, D; Rodriguez Esteban, E; Romo Peñas, E; Segura Saint-Gerons, C; Segura Saint-Gerons, J, 2003
)
0.61
" Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of free and total MPA and its glucuronides depend directly or indirectly on graft function and the type of co-administered calcineurin-inhibitor."( Twelve-month evaluation of the clinical pharmacokinetics of total and free mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolites in renal allograft recipients on low dose tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil.
Abramowicz, D; Armstrong, V; Daems, J; Kuypers, DR; Mourad, M; Oellerich, M; Shipkova, M; Squifflet, JP; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2003
)
0.51
"The authors conducted a prospective 12-month multicenter pharmacokinetic study on MPA (MPA, free MPA, free fraction MPA) and its metabolites (MPAG, Acyl-MPAG)."( Twelve-month evaluation of the clinical pharmacokinetics of total and free mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolites in renal allograft recipients on low dose tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil.
Abramowicz, D; Armstrong, V; Daems, J; Kuypers, DR; Mourad, M; Oellerich, M; Shipkova, M; Squifflet, JP; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2003
)
0.51
"They have demonstrated that in renal transplant recipients MPA, free MPA, Acyl-MPAG and MPAG have a particular pharmacokinetic profile when combined with tacrolimus which differs from the combination with CsA."( Twelve-month evaluation of the clinical pharmacokinetics of total and free mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolites in renal allograft recipients on low dose tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil.
Abramowicz, D; Armstrong, V; Daems, J; Kuypers, DR; Mourad, M; Oellerich, M; Shipkova, M; Squifflet, JP; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2003
)
0.71
" More extensive pharmacokinetic measurements like area under the concentration curves might be necessary for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of MMF."( Twelve-month evaluation of the clinical pharmacokinetics of total and free mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolites in renal allograft recipients on low dose tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil.
Abramowicz, D; Armstrong, V; Daems, J; Kuypers, DR; Mourad, M; Oellerich, M; Shipkova, M; Squifflet, JP; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2003
)
0.51
"We demonstrated that pharmacokinetic interaction occurs between steroids and tacrolimus in renal transplant patients."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between corticosteroids and tacrolimus after renal transplantation.
Anglicheau, D; Beaune, P; Cassinat, B; Flamant, M; Legendre, C; Martinez, F; Schlageter, MH; Thervet, E, 2003
)
0.79
" Blood concentrations appear to have a long-terminal half-life (30-40 hours after a single dose in fasted subjects, 50-100 hours after the final dose on day 28 in psoriasis patients)."( Pharmacokinetics of pimecrolimus, a novel nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drug, after single and multiple oral administration.
Burtin, P; Ebelin, ME; Greig, G; Hartmann, S; Komar, M; Osborne, SA; Rappersberger, K; Scott, G; Wolff, K, 2003
)
0.32
" A pharmacokinetic interaction between St."( Effects of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.
Akhtar, S; Chen, YL; Hebert, MF; Larson, AM; Park, JM, 2004
)
0.57
" Steady-state tacrolimus pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated on two occasions in an open-label, three-arm, two-period sequential study: twice daily dosing (Phase I) and once daily dosing (Phase II)."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: twice daily versus once daily dosing.
Brennan, DC; Hardinger, KL; Koch, MJ; Miller, BW; Park, JM; Schnitzler, MA, 2004
)
1.01
" The aim of this study was to perform a pharmacodynamic investigation of tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplant recipients."( A pharmacodynamic investigation of tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplantation.
Lynch, SV; Staatz, CE; Taylor, PJ; Tett, SE, 2004
)
0.83
" Fifty-one SRL and 55 TAC pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained from 20 male and 14 female recipients of liver alone (LTx, n = 23), small bowel alone, and with liver (SBTx, n = 11)."( Pharmacokinetics of sirolimus and tacrolimus in pediatric transplant patients.
Holt, DW; McGhee, W; Reyes, J; Schubert, M; Shaw, LM; Sindhi, R; Venkataramanan, R; Webber, S, 2004
)
0.6
" Study design We conducted a prospective 12-month pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in 100 de novo recipients."( Clinical efficacy and toxicity profile of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in relation to combined long-term pharmacokinetics in de novo renal allograft recipients.
Claes, K; Evenepoel, P; Kuypers, DR; Maes, B; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2004
)
0.82
"Tacrolimus and microemulsified cyclosporin display a wide intra- and inter-individual variation in pharmacokinetic properties in young subjects."( A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and microemulsified cyclosporin in paediatric renal transplant recipients.
Acott, PD; Crocker, JF; McLellan, H; Renton, KW, 2004
)
2.03
" Dosage and target concentration recommendations for tacrolimus vary from centre to centre, and large pharmacokinetic variability makes it difficult to predict what concentration will be achieved with a particular dose or dosage change."( Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation.
Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2004
)
0.83
" The specific characteristics of the inter-relationship between dose, concentration and clinical (side-)effects for tacrolimus have not yet been identified and extensive long-term pharmacokinetic studies are presently lacking."( Time-related clinical determinants of long-term tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in combination therapy with mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids: a prospective study in one hundred de novo renal transplant recipients.
Claes, K; Coosemans, W; Evenepoel, P; Kuypers, DR; Maes, B; Pirenne, J; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2004
)
0.79
"A prospective pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus was conducted in 100 de novo renal allograft recipients during the first year post-transplantation."( Time-related clinical determinants of long-term tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in combination therapy with mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids: a prospective study in one hundred de novo renal transplant recipients.
Claes, K; Coosemans, W; Evenepoel, P; Kuypers, DR; Maes, B; Pirenne, J; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2004
)
0.85
" Model-independent pharmacokinetic parameters for tacrolimus were calculated and dose-corrected when appropriate: AUC12, peak plasma concentration (Cmax), pre-dose trough concentration (C0), time to Cmax, average steady-state blood concentration, steady-state total body clearance, terminal half-life, volume of distribution and an estimate for tacrolimus bioavailability was derived from additional steady-state intravenous clearance data."( Time-related clinical determinants of long-term tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in combination therapy with mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids: a prospective study in one hundred de novo renal transplant recipients.
Claes, K; Coosemans, W; Evenepoel, P; Kuypers, DR; Maes, B; Pirenne, J; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2004
)
0.83
" The MDR1 polymorphism was not associated with any pharmacokinetic parameters."( Influence of CYP3A5 and MDR1 (ABCB1) polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients.
Habuchi, T; Kato, T; Li, Z; Ohyama, C; Sato, K; Satoh, S; Suzuki, T; Tada, H; Tsuchiya, N, 2004
)
0.55
"To evaluate the pharmacokinetic variability of sirolimus (Rapamycin, SRL) in our renal transplant (RTx) recipients, dose-normalized trough concentration (C(0)) of SRL, and their intrasubject coefficients of variation (%CV) were analyzed."( Pharmacokinetic variability of sirolimus in Taiwanese renal transplant recipients.
Chen, J; Chueh, SC; Lai, MK; Wang, SM, 2004
)
0.32
" The role of immunosuppressants in post-transplant outcome is crucial, and associations between exposure-related pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical outcome have been made for several drugs in this class."( Pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressants: a perspective on ethnic differences.
Dirks, NL; Huth, B; Meibohm, B; Yates, CR, 2004
)
0.32
"The aims of this study were to determine whether disposition-related pharmacokinetic parameters such as T(max) and mean residence time (MRT) could be used as predictors of clinical efficacy of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients, and to what extent these parameters would be influenced by clinical variables."( Time to reach tacrolimus maximum blood concentration,mean residence time, and acute renal allograft rejection: an open-label, prospective, pharmacokinetic study in adult recipients.
Kuypers, DR; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2004
)
0.87
"We previously demonstrated, in a prospective pharmacokinetic study in de novo renal allograft recipients, that patients who experienced early acute rejection did not differ from patients free from rejection in terms of tacrolimus pharmacokinetic exposure parameters (dose interval AUC, preadministration trough blood concentration, C(max), dose)."( Time to reach tacrolimus maximum blood concentration,mean residence time, and acute renal allograft rejection: an open-label, prospective, pharmacokinetic study in adult recipients.
Kuypers, DR; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2004
)
0.87
"Tacrolimus has become an effective alternative to cyclosporine as a component of primary immunosuppression in pediatric renal transplant patients, but the information on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of tacrolimus in young patients is still limited."( Effect of age, ethnicity, and glucocorticoid use on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in pediatric renal transplant patients.
Aviles, DH; Kim, JS; Leblanc, PL; Matti Vehaskari, V; Silverstein, DM, 2005
)
2.02
" Serial blood samples to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters taken on Day 1 (first ointment application) and Day 14 (last application) showed minimal systemic exposure to tacrolimus."( A multicenter study of the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus ointment after first and repeated application to children with atopic dermatitis.
Alomar, A; Bourke, J; Foster, C; Green, A; Harper, J; Jackson, K; Rubins, A; Smith, C; Stevenson, P; Undre, N; Zigure, S, 2005
)
0.78
" Neither the cyclosporine nor the tacrolimus dosage was adjusted for at least 3 days before and during blood sampling for pharmacokinetic profiling."( Effects of calcineurin inhibitors on sirolimus pharmacokinetics during staggered administration in renal transplant recipients.
Chen, KH; Chen, RR; Hu, RH; Huang, JD; Lee, PH; Sun, SW; Tsai, MK; Wu, FL, 2005
)
0.61
"The pharmacokinetic parameters of tacrolimus were calculated in steady-state on day 28 after transplantation."( Impact of CYP3A5 and MDR1(ABCB1) C3435T polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients.
Habuchi, T; Kagaya, H; Kato, T; Li, Z; Miura, M; Sato, K; Satoh, S; Suzuki, T; Tada, H; Tsuchiya, N, 2005
)
0.83
" The MDR1 C3435T polymorphisms did not affect any tacrolimus pharmacokinetic parameter in either group."( Impact of CYP3A5 and MDR1(ABCB1) C3435T polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients.
Habuchi, T; Kagaya, H; Kato, T; Li, Z; Miura, M; Sato, K; Satoh, S; Suzuki, T; Tada, H; Tsuchiya, N, 2005
)
0.81
"We performed 24-hour monitoring of cyclosporine (NEO) and tacrolimus (TAC) blood concentrations, evaluating pharmacokinetic parameters and characterizing circadian variations."( Pharmacokinetic differences between morning and evening administration of cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy.
Abudoshukur, M; Ashizawa, T; Hama, K; Hirano, T; Iwahori, T; Johjima, Y; Konno, O; Matsuno, N; Nagao, T; Nakamura, Y; Oka, K; Okuyama, K; Takeuchi, H; Uchiyama, M, 2005
)
0.79
"We evaluated the relative clinical potency of cyclosporine (CyA) and tacrolimus (Tac) using pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters of the drug to obtain the most suitable converting dose and target trough level."( Optimal dose and target trough level in cyclosporine and tacrolimus conversion in renal transplantation as evaluated by lymphocyte drug sensitivity and pharmacokinetic parameters.
Akashi, I; Ashizawa, T; Hama, K; Hirano, T; Iwahori, T; Iwamoto, H; Jojima, Y; Konno, O; Matsuno, N; Nagao, T; Nakamura, Y; Oka, K; Okuyama, K; Takeuchi, H; Uchiyama, M, 2005
)
0.81
"To investigate the population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in an adult liver transplant cohort using routine drug monitoring data and to identify patient characteristics that influence pharmacokinetic parameters."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in full liver transplant patients: modelling of the post-operative clearance.
Antignac, M; Boleslawski, E; Farinotti, R; Hannoun, L; Hulot, JS; Lechat, P; Touitou, Y; Urien, S, 2005
)
0.87
" Bayesian estimations performed at different POD times indicated that acceptable precisions in individual pharmacokinetic predictions could be obtained after the 15th POD."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in full liver transplant patients: modelling of the post-operative clearance.
Antignac, M; Boleslawski, E; Farinotti, R; Hannoun, L; Hulot, JS; Lechat, P; Touitou, Y; Urien, S, 2005
)
0.61
" A randomized, calcineurin inhibitor crossover, steady-state pharmacokinetic study in stable renal transplant patients receiving EC-MPS demonstrated increased MPA exposure of 19% higher, MPA C(max,ss) 19% lower and MPA C(min,ss) approximately twofold higher with tacrolimus, than cyclosporine microemulsion."( Randomized calcineurin inhibitor cross over study to measure the pharmacokinetics of co-administered enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium.
Balez, S; Bastien, MC; Kaplan, B; Meier-Kriesche, HU; Minnick, P; Picard, F; Schmouder, R; Sechaud, R; Yeh, CM, 2005
)
0.51
" Tacrolimus is a potent agent with a narrow therapeutic window and large inter- and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability."( Pharmacokinetic considerations relating to tacrolimus dosing in the elderly.
Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2005
)
1.5
" We investigated pharmacodynamic properties of the 2 drugs and their clinical relevance in liver transplantation."( Pharmacodynamic analysis of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in living-donor liver transplant patients.
Fukatsu, S; Fukudo, M; Inui, K; Katsura, T; Masuda, S; Ogura, Y; Oike, F; Takada, Y; Tanaka, K; Yano, I, 2005
)
0.62
" Pharmacodynamic assessment in combination with blood concentration monitoring may be useful for determining the individual therapeutic range of tacrolimus and cyclosporine."( Pharmacodynamic analysis of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in living-donor liver transplant patients.
Fukatsu, S; Fukudo, M; Inui, K; Katsura, T; Masuda, S; Ogura, Y; Oike, F; Takada, Y; Tanaka, K; Yano, I, 2005
)
0.82
"To assess the influence of cyclosporin A (CsA) and tacrolimus (FK506) on mycophenolic acid (MPA) and correlation analysis of the pharmacokinetic parameters and patient characteristics, clinical outcome in Chinese kidney transplant recipients, the pharmacokinetics of 1000 mg mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) twice daily was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)."( Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in Chinese kidney transplant patients.
Huang, HF; Liu, J; Lu, XY; Sheng-Tu, JZ, 2005
)
0.58
"Thirty-one 12-hour pharmacokinetic profiles were studied in 15 patients (8 men and 7 women, 42."( Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in lung transplantation: new strategies for monitoring.
Jakob, H; Kamler, M; Ragette, R; Teschler, H; Weinreich, G, 2005
)
1.77
"To: (i) test different pharmacokinetic models to fit full tacrolimus concentration-time profiles; (ii) estimate the tacrolimus pharmacokinetic characteristics in stable lung transplant patients with or without cystic fibrosis (CF); (iii) compare the pharmacokinetic parameters between these two patient groups; and (iv) design maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimators (MAP-BE) for pharmacokinetic forecasting in these patients using a limited sampling strategy."( Pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis lung transplant patients and design of Bayesian estimators using limited sampling strategies.
Debord, J; Estenne, M; Knoop, C; Marquet, P; Rousseau, A; Saint-Marcoux, F; Thiry, P, 2005
)
0.88
" Finally, Bayesian estimation using the best model and a limited sampling strategy was tested in the two groups of patients for its ability to provide accurate estimates of the main tacrolimus pharmacokinetic parameters and exposure indices."( Pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis lung transplant patients and design of Bayesian estimators using limited sampling strategies.
Debord, J; Estenne, M; Knoop, C; Marquet, P; Rousseau, A; Saint-Marcoux, F; Thiry, P, 2005
)
0.82
"A particular pharmacokinetic model was designed to fit the complex and highly variable tacrolimus blood concentration-time profiles."( Pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis lung transplant patients and design of Bayesian estimators using limited sampling strategies.
Debord, J; Estenne, M; Knoop, C; Marquet, P; Rousseau, A; Saint-Marcoux, F; Thiry, P, 2005
)
0.85
" The purpose of this study was to detect interpatient pharmacokinetic variability of tacrolimus and to assess the predictability of individual tacrolimus concentrations at various times for the area under the curve (AUC) seeking to find the best sampling time for an abbreviated AUC to predict the total body exposure of tacrolimus after the first oral dose in Chinese renal transplantation recipients."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus after the first oral administration in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Chen, LZ; Chen, YH; Dai, YP; Fei, JG; Li, J; Qiu, J; Zheng, KL, 2005
)
0.84
"5, and 3 hours as an abbreviated AUC were as good as a full pharmacokinetic study (r = ."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus after the first oral administration in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Chen, LZ; Chen, YH; Dai, YP; Fei, JG; Li, J; Qiu, J; Zheng, KL, 2005
)
0.62
"The objectives of this study were to develop population pharmacokinetic models of tacrolimus in an Asian population with whole blood and plasma drug concentration data, to compare the variability of the pharmacokinetic parameters in these two matrices and to search for the main patient characteristics that explain the variability in pharmacokinetic parameters."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in whole blood and plasma in asian liver transplant patients.
Aw, M; Chan, SY; Ho, PC; Holmes, MJ; Lee, KH; Lim, SG; Prabhakaran, K; Quak, SH; Sam, WJ; Tham, LS, 2006
)
0.85
"Prospective pharmacokinetic assessment followed by model fitting."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in whole blood and plasma in asian liver transplant patients.
Aw, M; Chan, SY; Ho, PC; Holmes, MJ; Lee, KH; Lim, SG; Prabhakaran, K; Quak, SH; Sam, WJ; Tham, LS, 2006
)
0.62
"Whole blood and plasma population pharmacokinetic models of tacrolimus in Asian adult and paediatric liver transplant patients were developed using prospective data in a clinical setting."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in whole blood and plasma in asian liver transplant patients.
Aw, M; Chan, SY; Ho, PC; Holmes, MJ; Lee, KH; Lim, SG; Prabhakaran, K; Quak, SH; Sam, WJ; Tham, LS, 2006
)
0.86
" This study compared the pharmacokinetic profiles of MPA and its major metabolite MPA glucuronide (MPAG) in combination with tacrolimus (TAC) or cyclosporine (CyA) during the maintenance period (>6 months) following renal transplantation."( Effects of calcineurin inhibitors on pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolite during the maintenance period following renal transplantation.
Hashimoto, H; Kagawa, Y; Maeda, T; Naito, T; Otsuka, A; Ozono, S; Shinno, K; Suzuki, K; Takayama, T; Ushiyama, T, 2006
)
0.54
"The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of time on pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in the early post-transplant period in kidney recipients."( Comparison of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetic parameters in kidney transplant patients within the first 3 months post-transplant.
Durlik, M; Gralak, B; Majchrnak, J; Pawinski, T; Szlaska, I; Urbanowicz, A, 2006
)
0.33
"Levofloxacin significantly increased the mean area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) and the other pharmacokinetic parameters of ciclosporin and tacrolimus by about 25%."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between levofloxacin and ciclosporin or tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: ciclosporin, tacrolimus and levofloxacin in renal transplantation.
Basile, V; Capone, D; Carrano, R; Federico, S; Gentile, A; Palmiero, G, 2006
)
0.77
" When MPA AUC and C(0) were within the recommended ranges, CEM proliferation was inhibited by almost all serum samples, but when these pharmacokinetic parameters were below the recommended ranges, CEM proliferation was very variable and, therefore, unpredictable."( Sequential determination of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolic acid in liver transplant patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil.
Brunet, M; Cirera, I; Jiménez, O; Londoño, MC; Martorell, J; Millán, O; Rimola, A; Rojo, I; Vidal, E, 2006
)
0.33
"A single-institution, open-label prospective pharmacokinetic evaluation of the interaction between intravenous itraconazole and intravenous cyclosporin A and tacrolimus was conducted in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients."( Pharmacokinetic evaluation of the drug interaction between intravenous itraconazole and intravenous tacrolimus or intravenous cyclosporin A in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.
Boyette, RM; Leather, H; Tian, L; Wingard, JR, 2006
)
0.75
" Children<6 years old need to start with a 50% higher tacrolimus dose to achieve the same pharmacokinetic and immunosuppressive results."( The pharmacokinetics and immunosuppressive response of tacrolimus in paediatric renal transplant recipients.
Carasi, C; Ghio, L; Ginevri, F; Montini, G; Murer, L; Plebani, M; Thafam, BS; Ujka, F; Varagnolo, C; Zacchello, G, 2006
)
0.83
" In pediatric transplant recipients, co-administration of these two drugs has been shown to result in a significant decrease of exposure to TAC, whereas conflicting data have been obtained regarding this pharmacokinetic interaction in adults."( Co-administration of sirolimus alters tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in a dose-dependent manner in adult renal transplant recipients.
Baldan, N; De Martin, S; Ekser, B; Frison, L; Furian, L; Margani, G; Palatini, P; Rigotti, P, 2006
)
0.6
" Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether CYP3A and ABCB1 polymorphisms are associated with the area under the time concentration curve (AUC0-12) calculated using a two time point sample strategy."( Influence of different allelic variants of the CYP3A and ABCB1 genes on the tacrolimus pharmacokinetic profile of Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Bekers, O; Chan, HW; Chau, KF; Cheung, CY; de Vrie, JE; Kwan, TH; Leung, KT; Li, CS; Op den Buijsch, RA; van Dieijen-Visser, MP; Wijnen, PA; Wong, KM, 2006
)
0.56
" Ocular pharmacokinetic parameters of FK506 were calculated by 3p87 software."( [The pharmacokinetics of FK506 and its nanoparticles in aqueous humor of rabbits].
Chen, JQ; Fei, WL; Liu, YM; Pang, ZQ; Wang, Z; Ye, CT; Yuan, J; Zhong, SL, 2006
)
0.33
" Some of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) of ABCB1 gene are associated with pharmacokinetic characteristics of TRL."( The effect of MDR1 (ABCB1) polymorphism on the pharmacokinetic of tacrolimus in Turkish renal transplant recipients.
Akbas, SH; Bilgen, T; Gultekin, M; Keser, I; Luleci, G; Tosun, O; Tuncer, M; Yucetin, L, 2006
)
0.57
"Population pharmacokinetic analysis using data from a retrospective chart review."( Factors affecting the apparent clearance of tacrolimus in Korean adult liver transplant recipients.
Hahn, HJ; Lee, JY; Oh, JM; Shin, WG; Son, IJ; Suh, KS; Yi, NJ, 2006
)
0.59
" A number of clinical covariates were screened for their influence on these pharmacokinetic parameters."( Factors affecting the apparent clearance of tacrolimus in Korean adult liver transplant recipients.
Hahn, HJ; Lee, JY; Oh, JM; Shin, WG; Son, IJ; Suh, KS; Yi, NJ, 2006
)
0.59
" However, transplanted patients exhibit heterogeneous immunological responses and high inter- and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variabilities."( Chronopharmacokinetics of ciclosporin and tacrolimus.
Baraldo, M; Furlanut, M, 2006
)
0.6
" Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling program NONMEM to estimate population mean parameters of apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent volume of distribution (V/F)."( Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic analysis of tacrolimus in pediatric living-donor liver transplant recipients.
Egawa, H; Fukudo, M; Goto, M; Inui, K; Katsura, T; Masuda, S; Ogura, Y; Oike, F; Takada, Y; Uemoto, S; Uesugi, M; Yano, I, 2006
)
0.58
"THP-1 cells were cultured as macrophages and then treated with plasma trough and peak concentration doses of SIR, SIR/CsA or SIR/TAC to assess the time- and dose-dependent mRNA or protein expression of selected atherogenic genes."( The pharmacodynamic effects of sirolimus and sirolimus-calcineurin inhibitor combinations on macrophage scavenger and nuclear hormone receptors.
Carl, SM; Friedman, GS; Jin, S; Knipp, GT; Mathis, AS; Peng, F, 2007
)
0.34
" These findings may provide a rationale for the development of novel drug delivery strategies to mitigate adverse pharmacodynamic responses."( The pharmacodynamic effects of sirolimus and sirolimus-calcineurin inhibitor combinations on macrophage scavenger and nuclear hormone receptors.
Carl, SM; Friedman, GS; Jin, S; Knipp, GT; Mathis, AS; Peng, F, 2007
)
0.34
" No difference was observed in Tac pharmacokinetic parameters in relation to ABCB1 polymorphisms."( CYP3A5 and ABCB1 polymorphisms and tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in renal transplant candidates: guidelines from an experimental study.
De Meyer, M; Eddour, DC; Elens, L; Haufroid, V; Lison, D; Malaise, J; Mourad, M; VanKerckhove, V; Wallemacq, P, 2006
)
0.61
"2 ng/mL, Cmax 10."( Differential pharmacokinetic interaction of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on everolimus.
Curtis, JJ; Hricik, DE; Kovarik, JM; Pescovitz, MD; Scantlebury, V; Vasquez, A, 2006
)
0.59
"Pretransplantation, there were no significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters of (R)-lansoprazole between the 3 ABCBI C3435T genotypes."( Influence of ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole and gastroesophageal symptoms in Japanese renal transplant recipients classified as CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers and treated with tacrolimus.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, K; Ishikawa, M; Kagaya, H; Kanno, S; Miura, M; Sagae, Y; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Suzuki, T; Tada, H, 2006
)
0.52
"Recent studies show that measuring pharmacodynamic (PD) effects offers a unique possibility to predict immunosuppression."( Pharmacodynamics of T-cell function for monitoring immunosuppression.
Barten, MJ; Bittner, HB; Dhein, S; Garbade, J; Gummert, JF; Mohr, FW; Tarnok, A, 2007
)
0.34
" A total of 72 pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained."( Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and determination of area under the curve by abbreviated sampling strategy in Chinese liver transplant recipients.
Chen, H; Deng, X; Fei, Y; Li, H; Peng, C; Qiu, W; Shen, B; Shen, C; Yang, W; Yu, Z; Zhou, G, 2007
)
0.34
"MMF and EC-MPS are associated with similar MPA exposure and equivalent pharmacodynamic effect."( Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in maintenance renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus: clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic outcomes.
Arns, W; Bauer, S; Budde, K; Fischer, W; Glander, P; Grohmann, J; Hoffmann, U; Krämer, BK; Neumayer, HH, 2007
)
0.54
" Key pharmacokinetic parameters, including C(max), AUC, t((1/2)), CL, and V(ss), were derived from concentration-time data."( Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between anidulafungin and tacrolimus.
Damle, B; Dowell, JA; Henkel, T; Krause, D; Stogniew, M, 2007
)
0.58
" In the adult and pediatric pharmacokinetic studies, serial blood samples were obtained after single and repeated topical application."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus following topical application of tacrolimus ointment in adult and pediatric patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.
Carlin, CS; Croy, R; Eichenfield, L; Goodman, JJ; Holum, ME; Jaracz, E; Keirns, J; Krafchik, BR; Krueger, GG; Pang, ML; Sawamoto, T, 2007
)
0.66
" Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were performed in 26 recipients of first living donor kidney transplants at day 7 after morning (a."( Circadian and time-dependent variability in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics.
Felipe, CR; Garcia, R; Medina-Pestana, JO; Park, SI; Pinheiro-Machado, PG; Tedesco-Silva, H, 2007
)
0.6
"002) meaning a significant different pharmacokinetic response in these two cohorts."( Influence of the CYP3A5 genotype on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in young kidney transplant recipients.
Edefonti, A; Ferraresso, M; Ghio, L; Grillo, P; Martina, V; Tirelli, A; Torresani, E, 2007
)
0.61
" Pharmacokinetic investigations of oral tacrolimus administration at 2 mg were performed both before and at the end of the SchE treatment period."( Effects of Schisandra sphenanthera extract on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in healthy volunteers.
Li, Q; Shen, Y; Su, D; Wu, XC; Xin, HW; Xiong, L; Yu, AR; Zhu, M, 2007
)
0.84
"To analyze the pharmacokinetic properties of the immunosuppressants cyclosporine and tacrolimus when either is coadministered with oral posaconazole."( Effect of oral posaconazole on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine and tacrolimus.
Gelone, S; Kantesaria, B; Krishna, G; Mant, TG; Martinho, M; Sansone-Parsons, A, 2007
)
0.8
"Two single-center, open-label pharmacokinetic studies of cyclosporine in a multiple-dose design and of tacrolimus in a one-sequence, crossover, single- and multiple-dose design."( Effect of oral posaconazole on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine and tacrolimus.
Gelone, S; Kantesaria, B; Krishna, G; Mant, TG; Martinho, M; Sansone-Parsons, A, 2007
)
0.79
" Since these drugs have narrow therapeutic windows and show considerable pharmacokinetic variability, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential to avoid adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity while maximizing immunosuppressive efficacy."( [Individualized dosage regimen of immunosuppressive drugs based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis].
Fukudo, M, 2007
)
0.34
"Tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant used after organ transplantation, has a narrow therapeutic range and its pharmacokinetic variability complicates its daily dose assessment."( Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics: influence of adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette B1 (ABCB1) and cytochrome (CYP) 3A polymorphisms.
Bekers, O; Cheung, CY; Christiaans, MH; de Vries, JE; Op den Buijsch, RA; Stolk, LM; Undre, NA; van Dieijen-Visser, MP; van Hooff, JP, 2007
)
3.23
" The aim of this study was to perform population pharmacokinetic analysis of oral tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients and clarify the potential role of CYP3A5, MDR1 and IL-10 genetic polymorphisms in the variability of population pharmacokinetic parameters."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and CYP3A5, MDR1 and IL-10 polymorphisms in adult liver transplant patients.
Gao, J; Li, D; Lou, YQ; Lu, W; Zhang, GL; Zhu, JY, 2007
)
0.85
"The liver function in patients as indicated by the total bilirubin level (TBIL) and different CYP3A5*3 genotypes in donors (CYPD) and recipients (CYPR) were observed to influence tacrolimus pharmacokinetic parameter of apparent clearance (Cl/F)."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and CYP3A5, MDR1 and IL-10 polymorphisms in adult liver transplant patients.
Gao, J; Li, D; Lou, YQ; Lu, W; Zhang, GL; Zhu, JY, 2007
)
0.82
"Fourteen patients participated in the study and seven participated in the intensified pharmacokinetic protocol."( Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in hepatitis C virus and HIV co-infected liver transplant recipients in the ANRS HC-08 study.
Abbara, C; Barrail, A; Boissonnas, A; Bonhomme-Faivre, L; Duclos-Vallée, JC; Samuel, D; Taburet, AM; Teicher, E; Vincent, I; Vittecoq, D, 2007
)
0.59
" Twelve-hour pharmacokinetic investigations to measure CsA and its six main metabolites, Tac and mycophenolate concentrations were performed before and after 1-week treatment with 30 mg cinacalcet once daily."( Cinacalcet's effect on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus, cyclosporine and mycophenolate in renal transplant recipients.
Asberg, A; Bergan, S; Falck, P; Holdaas, H; Midtvedt, K; Reubsaet, JL; Vethe, NT, 2008
)
0.6
" Namely, CYA blood concentration is usually monitored at 2 h after administration (C(2)) substituted for peak concentration (C(p)) and TAC at trough concentration (C(t))."( Evidence of different pharmacokinetics including relationship among AUC, peak, and trough levels between cyclosporine and tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients using new pharmacokinetic parameter--why cyclosporine is monitored by C(2) level and tacrol
Akashi, I; Ashizawa, T; Hama, K; Hirano, T; Iwahori, T; Iwamoto, H; Jojima, Y; Kihara, Y; Konno, O; Kuzuoka, K; Matsuno, N; Mejit, A; Nagao, T; Nakamura, Y; Oka, K; Okuyama, K; Senuma, K; Taira, S; Takeuchi, H; Toraishi, T; Unezaki, S; Yokoyama, T, 2008
)
0.55
" The mean dose-unadjusted and -adjusted Cmax of MPA with 30 mg lansoprazole were significantly lower than those without PPI (11."( Influence of lansoprazole and rabeprazole on mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics one year after renal transplantation.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, K; Kagaya, H; Miura, M; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Suzuki, T, 2008
)
0.35
" There were also no significant differences in the MPA pharmacokinetic parameters among three tacrolimus C(0) groups: 5 < or = C(0) < 10, 10 < or = C(0) < 15 and 15 < or =C(0) < 20 ng/mL."( No pharmacokinetic interactions between mycophenolic acid and tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, K; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Miura, M; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Suzuki, T, 2008
)
0.81
"Low and highly variable systemic exposure has been shown in pharmacokinetic studies of tacrolimus ointment performed in patients (adults and children) with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis."( [Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus following topical application of tacrolimus ointment in adult and paediatric patients with atopic dermatitis].
Undre, NA, 2008
)
0.89
" Sirolimus half-life and mean residence time (MRT) are shorter than in adults."( Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus in children.
Bendrick-Peart, J; Christians, U; Filler, G, 2008
)
0.35
", mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), seem to have different pharmacokinetic profiles."( Pharmacodynamic monitoring of the conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in stable kidney-allograft recipients.
Böhler, T; Canivet, C; Durand, D; Galvani, S; Kamar, N; Negre-Salvayre, A; Rostaing, L; Salvayre, R; Therville, N; Thomsen, M, 2008
)
0.35
" The objective of this study was to investigate the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic characteristics of the nanostructured aggregates containing amorphous or crystalline nanoparticles of TAC produced by ultra-rapid freezing (URF)."( Nebulization of nanoparticulate amorphous or crystalline tacrolimus--single-dose pharmacokinetics study in mice.
Johnston, KP; McConville, JT; Overhoff, KA; Sinswat, P; Williams, RO, 2008
)
0.59
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
" The aim was to analyze retrospectively the modification induced by CYP3A5 gene polymorphism on TAC's pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from 26 adolescents receiving TAC as their main immunosuppressive drug."( The effect of CYP3A5 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adolescent kidney transplant recipients.
Belingheri, M; Edefonti, A; Ferraresso, M; Ghio, L; Martina, V; Mattiello, C; Meregalli, E; Tirelli, S; Torresani, E, 2008
)
0.59
" Most pharmacokinetic (PK) studies have been focused on MPA, but not its metabolites, in kidney transplant recipients."( Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and its phenolic-glucuronide and ACYl glucuronide metabolites in stable thoracic transplant recipients.
Ensom, MH; Levy, RD; Partovi, N; Riggs, KW; Ting, LS, 2008
)
0.35
" Since these drugs have a narrow therapeutic range and show large inter- and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability, frequent therapeutic drug monitoring is required to control their blood concentrations."( Pharmacodynamic monitoring of calcineurin phosphatase activity in transplant patients treated with calcineurin inhibitors.
Yano, I, 2008
)
0.35
" Pharmacokinetic parameters of MPA were calculated by the noncompartmental method."( Impact of changing from cyclosporine to tacrolimus on pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in renal transplant recipients with diabetes.
Cibrik, DM; Lake, KD; Park, JM, 2008
)
0.61
" Namely, CyA blood concentration is usually monitored at two hours after administration (C2), a surrogate for peak concentration (Cp), and TAC at trough concentration (Ct)."( Evidence of different pharmacokinetics between cyclosporine and tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients: why cyclosporine is monitored by C2 level and tacrolimus by trough level.
Hama, K; Hirano, T; Iwamoto, H; Konno, O; Matsuno, N; Nagao, T; Nakamura, Y; Takeuchi, H; Toraishi, T; Unezaki, S, 2008
)
0.58
" Population pharmacokinetic data analysis was performed using the nonlinear mixed-effects model (NONMEM) program on the model building group."( [Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Chinese renal transplant patients].
Bi, SS; Chen, WQ; Li, L; Liu, X; Lu, W; Zhang, GM; Zhang, XL, 2008
)
0.63
"The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the pharmacokinetic profile of tacrolimus on its pancreatic toxicity and efficacy in rats."( Effect of pharmacokinetic profile on the pancreatic toxicity and efficacy of tacrolimus in rats.
Asano, M; Hanaoka, K; Mitamura, T; Niwa, T; Seki, J; Yamada, A, 2008
)
0.8
"An open-label, randomized, 3-way crossover, drug-drug interaction study of the investigational anti-HBV combination agent, emtricitabine/tenofovir DF and the antirejection agent, tacrolimus was conducted in healthy volunteers to evaluate the potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction between these drugs."( Pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tacrolimus at steady state when administered alone or in combination.
Alianti, JR; Begley, JA; Blum, MR; Chittick, GE; Sorbel, JJ; Zong, J, 2008
)
0.77
" Drug concentrations were measured by LC/MS/MS and steady state pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for each drug using noncompartmental methods."( Pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tacrolimus at steady state when administered alone or in combination.
Alianti, JR; Begley, JA; Blum, MR; Chittick, GE; Sorbel, JJ; Zong, J, 2008
)
0.58
"The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric least-squares mean ratio for AUCtau, Cmax and Ctau for each drug together vs."( Pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tacrolimus at steady state when administered alone or in combination.
Alianti, JR; Begley, JA; Blum, MR; Chittick, GE; Sorbel, JJ; Zong, J, 2008
)
0.58
"It was concluded that there was no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between emtricitabine/tenofovir DF and tacrolimus when administered together."( Pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tacrolimus at steady state when administered alone or in combination.
Alianti, JR; Begley, JA; Blum, MR; Chittick, GE; Sorbel, JJ; Zong, J, 2008
)
0.79
"The pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in liver transplant recipients may change because of pharmacokinetic interactions with coadministered immunosuppressants or because changes in the enterohepatic anatomy may affect biotransformation of MMF to mycophenolic acid (MPA) and enterohepatic recirculation of MPA through the hydrolysis of mycophenolate acid glucuronide to MPA in the gut."( Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in combination with standard-dose or reduced-dose tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients.
Barcéna, R; Bernardos, A; Bouw, R; Bowles, M; Durand, F; Herrero, JI; Ives, J; Klempnauer, J; Mamelok, R; Marotta, P; McKay, D; Mentha, G; Nashan, B; Neuhaus, P; Patch, D; Saliba, F; Truman, M, 2009
)
0.56
" A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed to estimate the effects of demographic factors, hematocrit, serum albumin concentration, prednisolone dose, TRL dose interval, polymorphisms in genes coding for ABCB1, CYP3A5, CYP3A4, and the pregnane X receptor on TRL pharmacokinetics."( Explaining variability in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics to optimize early exposure in adult kidney transplant recipients.
Danhof, M; de Fijter, JW; den Hartigh, J; Guchelaar, HJ; Ploeger, BA; Press, RR; van der Straaten, T; van Pelt, J, 2009
)
0.65
"This study was conducted to evaluate time-dependent pharmacokinetic changes and drug interactions over the first 6 months after transplantation in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus (TAC), prednisone (PRED) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus (SRL)."( Tacrolimus pharmacokinetic drug interactions: effect of prednisone, mycophenolic acid or sirolimus.
Casarini, DE; Felipe, CR; Fernandes, FB; Garcia, R; Medina-Pestana, JO; Park, SI; Pinheiro-Machado, PG; Tedesco-Silva, H, 2009
)
1.99
"VRZ TDM data analysis for trough concentration (C0) and peak concentration (C2) was carried out, using validated liquid chromatography assay with ultraviolet detection, for 35 CF lung transplant patients (mean age 25 years, mean weight 47 kg, balanced sex ratio) since 2003."( Voriconazole pharmacokinetic variability in cystic fibrosis lung transplant patients.
Amrein, C; Batisse, A; Berge, M; Billaud, EM; Boussaud, V; Chevalier, P; Dannaoui, E; Guillemain, R; Lillo-Le Louet, A; Loriot, MA; Pham, MH, 2009
)
0.35
" Patients receiving CSA had a significantly higher AcMPAG Cmax but not AcMPAG AUC, suggesting that only peak CSA concentrations on a low-dose CSA regimen are sufficient to impair the biliary excretion of AcMPAG."( Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolites in stable adult liver transplant recipients with renal dysfunction on a low-dose calcineurin inhibitor regimen and mycophenolate mofetil.
Armstrong, VW; Beckebaum, S; Cicinnati, VR; Gerken, G; Klein, CG; Oellerich, M; Paul, A; Streit, F, 2009
)
0.35
" Mean apparent half-life of tacrolimus was 80 +/- 35 h (range: 25-175 h)."( The pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus after first and repeated dosing with 0.03% ointment in infants with atopic dermatitis.
Cirule, K; Dickinson, J; Ho, V; Mäkelä, M; Mandelin, J; Reitamo, S; Remitz, A; Rubins, A; Rubins, S; Undre, N; Zigure, S, 2009
)
0.95
"A 3-month pharmacokinetic substudy of the prospective, randomized, multicentre, open-label Symphony study was performed."( The pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients receiving standard-dose or low-dose cyclosporine, low-dose tacrolimus or low-dose sirolimus: the Symphony pharmacokinetic substudy.
Brunet, M; Ekberg, H; Gentil, MA; Grinyó, JM; Hernandez, D; Kuypers, DR; Mamelok, RD; Oppenheimer, F; Sánchez-Plumed, J, 2009
)
0.56
" Cmax and C2 values tended to increase whereas C0 remained unaffected."( Rimonabant affects cyclosporine a, but not tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients.
Amundsen, R; Asberg, A; Bergan, S; Hartmann, A; Midtvedt, K; Robertsen, I; Vethe, NT, 2009
)
0.62
" This reaction is limits not only pharmacokinetic studies in animal but also development of human or humanized proteins as drugs."( Effect of co-administration of tacrolimus on the pharmacokinetics of multiple subcutaneous administered interferon-alpha in rats.
Ishida, T; Kiwada, H; Miyake, M; Mukai, T; Nishibayashi, T; Odomi, M; Yamazaki, H, 2009
)
0.64
"001 mg/kg) may be a promising way to assess crossover pharmacokinetic study of human or humanized proteinic formulations with multiple dosing schedules in an experimental animal."( Effect of co-administration of tacrolimus on the pharmacokinetics of multiple subcutaneous administered interferon-alpha in rats.
Ishida, T; Kiwada, H; Miyake, M; Mukai, T; Nishibayashi, T; Odomi, M; Yamazaki, H, 2009
)
0.64
" Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses utilized non-compartmental methods."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus co-administered with adefovir dipivoxil to liver transplant recipients.
Brown, RS; Enejosa, J; McGuire, BM; Ramanathan, S; Schiff, E; Terrault, NA; Tran, TT; Tupper, R; Zhong, L; Zong, J, 2009
)
0.68
"The median elimination half-life of tacrolimus was 14."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus co-administered with adefovir dipivoxil to liver transplant recipients.
Brown, RS; Enejosa, J; McGuire, BM; Ramanathan, S; Schiff, E; Terrault, NA; Tran, TT; Tupper, R; Zhong, L; Zong, J, 2009
)
0.95
" Determination of pharmacokinetic parameters of single-dose and multiple-dose administration, as well as the FK506 concentrations in eye tissues, showed that the FK506 formulation and the dosing regimen ensured the therapeutic concentration of FK506 for treating corneal allograft rejection."( Preparation of 0.05% FK506 suspension eyedrops and its pharmacokinetics after topical ocular administration.
Chen, JQ; Ye, CT; Yuan, J; Zhai, JJ; Zhou, SY, 2009
)
0.35
" Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: new initial dosage suggestions and a model-based dosage adjustment tool.
Fasth, A; Friberg, LE; Staatz, CE; Wallin, JE, 2009
)
0.64
" Therefore, alternative pharmacokinetic (ie, MPA free fraction and metabolites) and pharmacodynamic approaches to better predict drug efficacy and toxicity are being explored."( New insights into the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolic acid: possible consequences for therapeutic drug monitoring in solid organ transplantation.
de Jonge, H; Kuypers, DR; Naesens, M, 2009
)
0.35
"94) were applied to pharmacokinetic data obtained at 1 year."( Early phase limited sampling strategy characterizing tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics adapted to the maintenance phase of renal transplant patients.
Habuchi, T; Hayakari, M; Kagaya, H; Miura, M; Niioka, T; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Suzuki, T, 2009
)
0.6
" This study aimed to (1) compare this new assay with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for MPA pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in different populations of allograft recipients given mycophenolate mofetil, (2) develop specific Bayesian estimators for this inhibition assay and test their accuracy, and (3) compare the resulting MPA area under the curve (AUC0-12h) estimates with those of Bayesian estimators developed based on the LC-MS/MS results."( Performance of the new mycophenolate assay based on IMPDH enzymatic activity for pharmacokinetic investigations and setup of Bayesian estimators in different populations of allograft recipients.
Debord, J; Domke, I; Jaqz-Aigrain, E; Knoop, C; Lebranchu, Y; Marquet, P; Prémaud, A; Saint-Marcoux, F; Sauvage, FL; Tiberi, M, 2009
)
0.35
" This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the potential pharmacokinetic interaction of concomitant administration of maribavir and tacrolimus."( A randomized, double-blind, pharmacokinetic study of oral maribavir with tacrolimus in stable renal transplant recipients.
Bloom, R; Gelone, S; Johnson, J; Pescovitz, MD; Pirsch, J; Villano, SA, 2009
)
0.78
" It is essential to know their pharmacokinetic properties and to use them for treatment individualization through TDM in order to improve the treatment outcome."( Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I.
Marquet, P; Monchaud, C, 2009
)
0.35
" Also a complete 12-hour pharmacokinetic profile was recorded for 15 transplant patients who had the polymorphism and for 15 controls who were randomly chosen since they received the same type and dosage of mycophenolate, same posttransplant time and similar renal function."( The prevalence of uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 1A9 (UGT1A9) gene promoter region single-nucleotide polymorphisms T-275A and C-2152T and its influence on mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in stable renal transplant patients.
Arroyo, M; Barrientos, A; Calvo, N; De la Orden, V; Maestro, ML; Ortega, D; Pérez-Flores, I; Sánchez-Fructuoso, AI; Veganzone, S; Viudarreta, M,
)
0.13
"There were no differences in dose (D) and body weight (BW)-adjusted pharmacokinetic parameters of tacrolimus among the three groups."( No impact of age on dose-adjusted pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid and prednisolone 1 month after renal transplantation.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Miura, M; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Suzuki, T; Tsuchiya, N, 2009
)
0.82
" Although there has been an extensive pharmacokinetic (PK) experience with MMF administration following solid organ transplantation in children, there is a paucity of PK data following its use in pediatric AlloSCT recipients."( An age-dependent pharmacokinetic study of intravenous and oral mycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus for GVHD prophylaxis in pediatric allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipients.
Ayello, J; Baxter-Lowe, L; Bhatia, M; Bradley, MB; Cairo, MS; Figurski, M; Garvin, J; George, D; Jin, Z; Militano, O; Moore, V; Morris, E; Satwani, P; Shaw, L; Tallamy, B; van deVen, C, 2010
)
0.57
" The aims of this study were: 1) to identify and model the effect of demographic, clinical, and genetic factors and time of drug administration on TAC pharmacokinetic variability; and 2) to assess the influence of the analytical method by modeling the TAC blood concentrations measured simultaneously by microparticle enzyme immune assay (MEIA) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy."( Time of drug administration, CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genotypes, and analytical method influence tacrolimus pharmacokinetics: a population pharmacokinetic study.
Delattre, IK; Haufroid, V; Mourad, M; Musuamba, FT; Verbeeck, RK; Wallemacq, P, 2009
)
0.57
"The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in pediatric kidney transplant patients, identify factors that explain variability, and determine dosage regimens."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus in de novo pediatric kidney transplant recipients.
André, JL; Bensman, A; Brochard, K; Cloarec, S; Cochat, P; Elie, V; Fakhoury, M; Garaix, F; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Leroy, V; Loirat, C; Niaudet, P; Roussey, G; Zhao, W, 2009
)
0.83
"Because tacrolimus (Tac) has a narrow therapeutic index and highly inter- and intra-individual variable pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics, monitoring of drug exposure is recommended, but limited data are available on the kinetics of Tac in paediatric renal transplant recipients, especially of limited sampling strategies."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in stable paediatric renal transplant recipients.
Claeys, T; Van Damme-Lombaerts, R; Van Dyck, M, 2010
)
1.12
"The aims of this study were (i) to investigate the population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients, including the influence of biological and pharmacogenetic covariates; and (ii) to develop a Bayesian estimator able to reliably estimate the individual pharmacokinetic parameters and inter-dose area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 12 hours (AUC(12)) in renal transplant patients."( Tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic-pharmacogenetic analysis and Bayesian estimation in renal transplant recipients.
Benkali, K; Hoizey, G; Le Meur, Y; Marquet, P; Picard, N; Prémaud, A; Rérolle, JP; Rousseau, A; Toupance, O; Turcant, A; Villemain, F, 2009
)
2.02
"Full pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained from 32 renal transplant patients at weeks 1 and 2, and at months 1, 3 and 6 post-transplantation."( Tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic-pharmacogenetic analysis and Bayesian estimation in renal transplant recipients.
Benkali, K; Hoizey, G; Le Meur, Y; Marquet, P; Picard, N; Prémaud, A; Rérolle, JP; Rousseau, A; Toupance, O; Turcant, A; Villemain, F, 2009
)
1.8
"Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients showed a significant influence of the haematocrit on its CL/F and led to the development of a Bayesian estimator compatible with clinical practice and able to accurately predict tacrolimus individual pharmacokinetic parameters and the AUC(12)."( Tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic-pharmacogenetic analysis and Bayesian estimation in renal transplant recipients.
Benkali, K; Hoizey, G; Le Meur, Y; Marquet, P; Picard, N; Prémaud, A; Rérolle, JP; Rousseau, A; Toupance, O; Turcant, A; Villemain, F, 2009
)
2.06
" The aim of the study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model describing the relationship between MMF dose and total MPA (tMPA), unbound MPA (fMPA), total MPAG (tMPAG) and unbound MPAG (fMPAG)."( Pharmacokinetic role of protein binding of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolite in renal transplant recipients.
de Winter, BC; Mathot, RA; Shaw, LM; Sombogaard, F; van Gelder, T; van Hest, RM, 2009
)
0.35
"The pharmacokinetic properties of immunosuppressive drugs are quite different in newborns than in adults and few studies describe the pharmacokinetics of these drugs in pediatric heart transplant recipients."( Two-year follow-up of the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs in a neonate who underwent heart transplantation.
Cabano, R; D'Armini, AM; Molinaro, MD; Pellegrini, C; Perotti, G; Regazzi, M; Stronati, M; Tzialla, C; Viganò, M, 2009
)
0.35
" These drugs show large interindividual pharmacokinetic variation and are associated with severe adverse affects, including nephrotoxicity and cardiovascular disease."( Pharmacodynamic monitoring of calcineurin inhibition therapy: principles, performance, and perspectives.
de Fijter, JW; van Pelt, J; van Rossum, HH, 2010
)
0.36
" Genotyping for CYP3A5*3 was performed in healthy volunteers who had previously participated in the pharmacokinetic study of 2 tacrolimus formulations with a 2 x 2 cross-over design."( CYP3A5*3 genotype associated with intrasubject pharmacokinetic variation toward tacrolimus in bioequivalence study.
Ahyoung Lim, L; Bok Jang, S; Hwan Kim, K; Jung Lee, Y; Soo Park, M; Yong Chung, J, 2010
)
0.79
"The present study is to establish the population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model of tacrolimus and to estimate PPK parameters of tacrolimus for the individualization of tacrolimus administration in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplant."( [Population pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplant].
Miao, LY; Rui, JZ; Xue, L; Zhang, Y, 2009
)
0.85
"This study investigates the potential pharmacokinetic interactions between an antimicrobial agent, moxifloxacin, and 2 immunosuppressant drugs, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, in kidney transplant recipients."( Absence of pharmacokinetic interference of moxifloxacin on cyclosporine and tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.
Basile, V; Capone, D; Carrano, R; Federico, S; Kadilli, I; Nappi, R; Polichetti, G; Sabbatini, M; Tarantino, G, 2010
)
0.79
" The aim of this study was to detect inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability of tacrolimus and to assess the predictability of individual tacrolimus concentrations at various times of the area under the curve (AUC) seeking to find the best sampling time to predict the exposure of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients with triple therapy."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus after the first oral administration in renal transplant recipients on triple immunosuppressive therapy.
Catic-Djordjevic, A; Cvetkovic, T; Djordjevic, V; Mikov, M; Paunovic, G; Stojanovic, M; Velickovic-Radovanovic, RM, 2010
)
0.88
" However, as a result of differences in their pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, the PK models or Bayesian estimators (MAP-BE) previously developed for the immediate-release formulation cannot be used for the new once-daily formulation."( Pharmacokinetic modeling and development of Bayesian estimators in kidney transplant patients receiving the tacrolimus once-daily formulation.
Debord, J; Marquet, P; Rousseau, A; Saint-Marcoux, F; Undre, N, 2010
)
0.57
" The pharmacokinetic samples were collected from 89 de novo pediatric renal-transplant patients treated with MMF and studied during the first 60 postoperative days."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of mycophenolic acid following administration of mycophenolate mofetil in de novo pediatric renal-transplant patients.
André, JL; Azougagh, S; Bensman, A; Brochard, K; Cloarec, S; Cochat, P; Deschênes, G; Fakhoury, M; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Niaudet, P; Roussey, G; Tsimaratos, M; Zhao, W, 2010
)
0.36
" Genetic linkage between the three variant genotypes suggests that the pharmacokinetic effects are complex and not related to any one ABCB1 SNP."( Effect of CYP3A and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of calcineurin inhibitors: Part I.
Goodman, LK; Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2010
)
0.36
" After oral administration of tacrolimus, we monitored its plasma concentrations in these volunteers for up to 72 h and calculated the pharmacokinetic parameters."( An integrative approach for identifying a metabolic phenotype predictive of individualized pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus.
Cho, JH; Hwang, D; Kale, DD; Kim, SD; Kim, YL; Lee, HW; Lim, M; Phapale, PB; Yoon, YR, 2010
)
0.86
"A prospective randomized phase II pharmacokinetic study was conducted comparing two fixed EVL dosages (0."( Interaction between everolimus and tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients: a pharmacokinetic controlled trial.
Brunet, M; Cabello, M; del Castillo, D; Fernández, AM; Grinyó, JM; Pallardó, L; Pascual, J, 2010
)
0.64
" How sotrastaurin and tacrolimus could be partnered in an immunosuppressive regimen will need to be established in the context of controlled clinical trials in organ transplant patients, taking into account the pharmacokinetic interaction on tacrolimus and the potentially enhanced immunosuppressive activity of this drug combination."( Sotrastaurin and tacrolimus coadministration: effects on pharmacokinetics and biomarker responses.
Grenet, O; Kovarik, JM; Seiberling, M; Sfikas, N; Slade, A; Stitah, S; Straube, F; Vitaliti, A; Winter, S, 2010
)
1.01
"Specific antibody production is an important issue in crossover pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of protein-based formulations."( Co-administration of tacrolimus suppresses pharmacokinetic modulation of multiple subcutaneously administered human interferon-alpha in Beagle dogs.
Ishida, T; Kamada, N; Kiwada, H; Miyake, M; Mukai, T; Nishibayashi, T; Odomi, M; Yamazaki, H, 2010
)
0.68
" Pharmacokinetic model was developed with Linear Regression and General Linear Model repeated measures approach."( Factors affecting the long-term response to tacrolimus in renal transplant patients: pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic approach.
Flordellis, CS; Goumenos, DS; Katsakiori, PF; Nikiforidis, GC; Papapetrou, EP; Sakellaropoulos, GC, 2010
)
0.62
" The aims of his study were (i) to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for once-daily tacrolimus in adult renal transplant patients; and (ii) to develop a Bayesian estimator able to reliably estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters and exposure indices."( Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimation of tacrolimus exposure in renal transplant recipients on a new once-daily formulation.
Benkali, K; Kamar, N; Marquet, P; Premaud, A; Rostaing, L; Rousseau, A; Saint-Marcoux, F; Urien, S; Woillard, JB, 2010
)
0.83
"Full pharmacokinetic profiles obtained from 41 adult renal transplant patients who had been switched from ciclosporin to a single daily dose of the new once-daily tacrolimus formulation for more than 6 months were analysed."( Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimation of tacrolimus exposure in renal transplant recipients on a new once-daily formulation.
Benkali, K; Kamar, N; Marquet, P; Premaud, A; Rostaing, L; Rousseau, A; Saint-Marcoux, F; Urien, S; Woillard, JB, 2010
)
0.8
"Population pharmacokinetic analysis of once-daily tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients resulted in identification of the CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype as a significant covariate on the apparent clearance of tacrolimus, and the design of an accurate maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimator based on three blood concentration measurements and this covariate."( Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimation of tacrolimus exposure in renal transplant recipients on a new once-daily formulation.
Benkali, K; Kamar, N; Marquet, P; Premaud, A; Rostaing, L; Rousseau, A; Saint-Marcoux, F; Urien, S; Woillard, JB, 2010
)
0.86
" Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus is recommended because it demonstrates wide pharmacokinetic interpatient variability."( A systematic review of the effect of CYP3A5 genotype on the apparent oral clearance of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients.
Barry, A; Levine, M, 2010
)
0.87
" A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model estimating oral clearance, between-patient variability in oral clearance, central volume of distribution, and residual variability in combination with historical estimates of first-order absorption rate constant, intercompartmental clearance, and peripheral volume of distribution adequately described the sparse MPA data."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis of mycophenolic acid coadministered with either tasocitinib (CP-690,550) or tacrolimus in adult renal allograft recipients.
Busque, S; Chan, G; Krishnaswami, S; Lamba, M; Melcher, M; Tafti, B, 2010
)
0.57
"In this study, we evaluated the influence of different variance from each of the parameters on the output of tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model in Chinese healthy volunteers, using Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST)."( [Application of Fourier amplitude sensitivity test in Chinese healthy volunteer population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus].
Guan, Z; Liu, LH; Lu, W; Ma, P; Zhang, GM; Zhou, TY, 2010
)
0.78
" At 3 days, there was a strong correlation between AUC0-24 and Cmin both for tacrolimus QD (r=."( Pharmacokinetics of once- versus twice-daily tacrolimus formulations in kidney transplant patients receiving expanded criteria deceased donor organs: a single-center, randomized study.
Burgos, D; Cabello, M; Díez de los Rios, MJ; García, P; García-Sáiz, M; González-Molina, M; Gutiérrez, C; Hernández, D; López, V; Sola, E, 2010
)
0.85
" We calculated pharmacokinetic parameters of tacrolimus from blood concentrations in steady state at day 28."( Influence of CYP3A5 and MDR1(ABCB1) polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Deng-Qing, L; Hong-Shan, Z; Jing, L; Rong, G; Shai-Hong, Z; Xin-Min, N, 2010
)
0.85
"The pharmacokinetic study of EC-MPS was conducted in 11 de novo kidney transplant patients of Hispanic ethnicity."( The pharmacokinetics of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and its gastrointestinal side effects in de novo renal transplant recipients of Hispanic ethnicity.
Hutchinson, I; Min, DI; Qazi, Y; Shah, T; Tellez-Corrales, E; Wang, J; Wilson, J; Yang, JW, 2011
)
0.37
" The mean daily dose of EC-MPS at the time of the pharmacokinetic study was 1408 ± 108 mg."( The pharmacokinetics of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and its gastrointestinal side effects in de novo renal transplant recipients of Hispanic ethnicity.
Hutchinson, I; Min, DI; Qazi, Y; Shah, T; Tellez-Corrales, E; Wang, J; Wilson, J; Yang, JW, 2011
)
0.37
" The MPA exposure expressed by the AUC appears to be higher in Hispanic patients than those reported in other ethnic groups, which may be the result of various factors such as difference of the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase enzyme genotypes, but gastrointestinal side effects were acceptable and the Cmax or AUC of MPAG showed correlations with gastrointestinal symptoms."( The pharmacokinetics of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and its gastrointestinal side effects in de novo renal transplant recipients of Hispanic ethnicity.
Hutchinson, I; Min, DI; Qazi, Y; Shah, T; Tellez-Corrales, E; Wang, J; Wilson, J; Yang, JW, 2011
)
0.37
"The creation of virtual populations allows the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters, such as metabolic clearance in extreme individuals rather than the 'average human'."( Determination of a quantitative relationship between hepatic CYP3A5*1/*3 and CYP3A4 expression for use in the prediction of metabolic clearance in virtual populations.
Allorge, D; Barter, ZE; Lennard, MS; Perrett, HF; Rostami-Hodjegan, A; Yeo, KR, 2010
)
0.36
" This investigation highlights the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between the calcineurin inhibitors and proliferation signal inhibitors with commonly used anti-microbial agents, specifically addressing mechanism, management, onset of action, magnitude of effect and strength of evidence for each interaction."( Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between calcineurin inhibitors and proliferation signal inhibitors with anti-microbial agents: implications for therapeutic drug monitoring.
Levi, ME; Lindenfeld, J; Mueller, SW; Page, RL, 2011
)
0.37
" Pharmacokinetic characteristics of MMF and its relation to the degree of immune suppression have not been fully clarified in clinical practice."( [Optimal immunosuppressive therapy based on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimetabolites in clinical practice].
Naito, T, 2010
)
0.36
" Tacrolimus exposure was significantly increased by sotrastaurin in the initial weeks posttransplant by a pharmacokinetic interaction."( Pharmacokinetics of sotrastaurin combined with tacrolimus or mycophenolic acid in de novo kidney transplant recipients.
Arns, W; Budde, K; Dantal, J; Grinyo, JM; Kovarik, JM; Proot, P; Rostaing, L; Steiger, JU, 2011
)
1.54
" Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) parameters were estimated using nonmem."( Population pharmacokinetic model and Bayesian estimator for two tacrolimus formulations--twice daily Prograf and once daily Advagraf.
de Winter, BC; Kamar, N; Marquet, P; Rostaing, L; Rousseau, A; Woillard, JB, 2011
)
0.61
"To explore the main factors that make it difficult to empirically monitor tacrolimus (TAC) in the early period post-liver transplantation (LTx), with a specific focus on those aspects related to patient idiosyncrasy and clinical status as well as to the pharmacokinetic (PK) assumptions on which drug individualization in clinical practice is based."( Pathophysiological idiosyncrasies and pharmacokinetic realities may interfere with tacrolimus dose titration in liver transplantation.
Calvo, R; de Urbina, JO; Gastaca, M; Leal, N; Lukas, JC; Oteo, I; Suarez, E; Valdivieso, A, 2011
)
0.83
" Pharmacokinetic sampling was done before MPA administration and up to 12 h post-dose at Day 7, 1 month and 3 months post-transplant."( Influence of MRP2 on MPA pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients-results of the Pharmacogenomic Substudy within the Symphony Study.
Andreu, F; Brunet, M; Cruzado, JM; Ekberg, H; Gentil, MÁ; Grinyó, JM; Lloberas, N; Oppenheimer, F; Sánchez-Plumed, J; Torras, J, 2011
)
0.37
"The aim of this study was to detect interpatient pharmacokinetic variability of tacrolimus due to patients' gender and to assess the predictability of individual tacrolimus concentrations using abbreviated AUC measurements."( Gender differences in pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and their clinical significance in kidney transplant recipients.
Cvetković, T; Djordjević, AC; Djordjević, V; Mikov, M; Paunović, G; Stojanović, M; Velicković-Radovanović, R, 2011
)
0.86
"The present study was designed to determine the pharmacokinetic profiles of a once-daily formulation of tacrolimus (CAS 104987-11-3; TAC-once) in patients before and after introduction of renal transplantation."( Pharmacokinetic properties of a once-daily formulation of tacrolimus in patients with renal transplantation.
Deguchi, T; Imanishi, Y; Ishida, K; Ito, S; Itoh, Y; Matsui, K; Matsuura, K, 2011
)
0.83
" Coadministration with telaprevir increased the terminal elimination half-life (t(½)) of cyclosporine from a mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 12 (1."( Effect of telaprevir on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine and tacrolimus.
Alves, K; Garg, V; Lee, JE; Luo, X; Nadkarni, P; van Heeswijk, R, 2011
)
0.61
" Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring requires the application of reliable and effective methods to study the pharmacodynamic variability by direct measurements of drug effects on immune cell functions."( Flow cytometry-based pharmacodynamic monitoring after organ transplantation.
Barten, MJ; Bittner, HB; Dieterlen, MT; Eberhardt, K; Tarnok, A, 2011
)
0.37
" Because there are no pharmacokinetic studies of tacrolimus in this ethnic group, we investigated whether this clinical observation could be corroborated by pharmacokinetic differences between Native Americans and other ethnic and racial groups."( Pharmacokinetic differences corroborate observed low tacrolimus dosage in Native American renal transplant patients.
Benet, LZ; Chakkera, HA; Frassetto, LA; Grover, A, 2011
)
0.87
" Twenty-four hour pharmacokinetic studies were carried out on d 0 (pre-conversion), d 1, and d 84 (post-conversion)."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus converted from twice-daily formulation to once-daily formulation in Chinese stable liver transplant recipients.
Chen, XY; Dai, XJ; Leng, XS; Zhang, YF; Zhong, DF, 2011
)
0.69
" A population-based pharmacokinetic simulator (Simcyp) was used to simulate tacrolimus clearance from in vitro metabolism data and demographic characteristics of Japanese liver transplant patients (JLTs)."( Bottom-up modeling and simulation of tacrolimus clearance: prospective investigation of blood cell distribution, sex and CYP3A5 expression as covariates and assessment of study power.
Barter, Z; Makuuchi, M; Minematsu, T; Ohtani, H; Rostami-Hodjegan, A; Sawada, Y, 2011
)
0.87
"The aim of this study was to establish population pharmacokinetic models of tacrolimus in healthy Chinese volunteers."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Ma, S; Miao, LY; Rui, JZ; Xue, L; Zhang, H, 2011
)
0.85
" Population pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using NONMEM."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Ma, S; Miao, LY; Rui, JZ; Xue, L; Zhang, H, 2011
)
0.62
" The typical population values of tacrolimus for the pharmacokinetic parameters of apparent clearance (CL/F), apparent distribution volume of the central compartment (V(2)/F), intercompartmental clearance (Q/F), apparent distribution volume of the peripheral compartment (V(3)/F), absorption rate (ka) and lag time (ALAG) were 27."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Ma, S; Miao, LY; Rui, JZ; Xue, L; Zhang, H, 2011
)
0.9
"Population pharmacokinetic models of tacrolimus were developed in healthy volunteers."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Ma, S; Miao, LY; Rui, JZ; Xue, L; Zhang, H, 2011
)
0.89
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant with a narrow therapeutic window, with considerable pharmacokinetic variability."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplantation: early posttransplantation clearance.
Bergstrand, M; Karlsson, MO; Nydert, PS; Staatz, CE; Wallin, JE; Wilczek, HE, 2011
)
2.1
"The predictive capacity of 2 previously developed population pharmacokinetic models of tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplant recipients was tested in 20 new patients using Bayesian forecasting."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplantation: early posttransplantation clearance.
Bergstrand, M; Karlsson, MO; Nydert, PS; Staatz, CE; Wallin, JE; Wilczek, HE, 2011
)
0.88
"A population pharmacokinetic model for tacrolimus was developed, to better describe the early posttransplantation phase."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplantation: early posttransplantation clearance.
Bergstrand, M; Karlsson, MO; Nydert, PS; Staatz, CE; Wallin, JE; Wilczek, HE, 2011
)
0.92
" A pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between Os and immunosuppressive drugs might adversely affect the efficacy and/or toxicity of the latter agents."( Oseltamivir, an influenza neuraminidase inhibitor drug, does not affect the steady-state pharmacokinetic characteristics of cyclosporine, mycophenolate, or tacrolimus in adult renal transplant patients.
Aoki, FY; Jeffery, J; Lam, H; Sitar, DS, 2011
)
0.57
" Pharmacokinetic profiles of MPA and TAC were obtained from 65 stable adult renal allograft recipients on a single occasion (ie, day 15 after transplantation)."( A simultaneous d-optimal designed study for population pharmacokinetic analyses of mycophenolic Acid and tacrolimus early after renal transplantation.
Capron, A; Delaruelle, F; Delattre, IK; Demeyer, M; Haufroid, V; Mourad, M; Musuamba, FT; Verbeeck, RK; Wallemacq, P, 2012
)
0.59
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were then analyzed by conventional noncompartmental modeling."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients on a corticosteroid-free regimen.
Al-Khatib, M; Ensom, MH; Greanya, ED; Partovi, N; Poulin, E; Shapiro, RJ, 2012
)
0.7
" pharmacokinetic parameters for tacrolimus, normalized to a dose of 1 mg, were as follows: area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), 52."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients on a corticosteroid-free regimen.
Al-Khatib, M; Ensom, MH; Greanya, ED; Partovi, N; Poulin, E; Shapiro, RJ, 2012
)
0.99
" Steady-state tacrolimus area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours and Cmin were comparable for both formulations, with treatment ratio means (90% confidence intervals) of 92."( Pharmacokinetics in stable kidney transplant recipients after conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus formulations.
Christiaans, M; Dawood, S; Kallmeyer, J; Karpf, C; Miller, D; Moosa, MR; Undre, N; Van der Walt, I; van Hooff, J, 2012
)
0.95
" As demonstrated, pharmacokinetic studies reveal that, as compared with FK506-loaded BSA nanoparticles, the FK506/DM-β-CD inclusion complex-loaded BSA nanoparticles have significant increase at T(max), t(1/2), MRT and decrease at C(max)."( Preparation, characterization and pharmacokinetic studies of tacrolimus-dimethyl-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex-loaded albumin nanoparticles.
Fu, D; Gao, F; Gao, S; Lan, M; Sun, J; Zhao, H, 2012
)
0.62
"The aims were to estimate the mycophenolic acid (MPA) population pharmacokinetic parameters in paediatric liver transplant recipients, to identify the factors affecting MPA pharmacokinetics and to develop a limited sampling strategy to estimate individual MPA AUC(0,12 h)."( Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and dose optimization with limited sampling strategy in liver transplant children.
Barau, C; Barrail-Tran, A; Debray, D; Furlan, V; Taburet, AM, 2012
)
0.38
" The population parameters were estimated from a model-building set of 16 intensive pharmacokinetic datasets obtained from 16 children."( Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and dose optimization with limited sampling strategy in liver transplant children.
Barau, C; Barrail-Tran, A; Debray, D; Furlan, V; Taburet, AM, 2012
)
0.38
" To estimate individual AUC(0,12 h), the pharmacokinetic parameters obtained with the final model, including covariates, were coded in Adapt II(®) software, using the Bayesian approach."( Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and dose optimization with limited sampling strategy in liver transplant children.
Barau, C; Barrail-Tran, A; Debray, D; Furlan, V; Taburet, AM, 2012
)
0.38
"This study allowed the estimation of the population pharmacokinetic MPA parameters."( Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and dose optimization with limited sampling strategy in liver transplant children.
Barau, C; Barrail-Tran, A; Debray, D; Furlan, V; Taburet, AM, 2012
)
0.38
"A population pharmacokinetic model was developed by nonlinear mixed-effects modelling using NONMEM® version VI, from 182 tacrolimus full concentration-time profiles collected in 78 lung transplant recipients within the first year post-transplantation."( Population pharmacokinetic modelling and design of a Bayesian estimator for therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus in lung transplantation.
de Winter, BC; Estenne, M; Guillemain, R; Kessler, R; Knoop, C; Marquet, P; Monchaud, C; Pison, C; Reynaud-Gaubert, M; Rousseau, A; Stern, M, 2012
)
0.8
"Population pharmacokinetic analysis showed that lung transplant patients with CF displayed lower bioavailability and a smaller transfer rate constant between transit compartments than those without CF, while the apparent clearance was faster in CYP3A5 expressers than in non-expressers."( Population pharmacokinetic modelling and design of a Bayesian estimator for therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus in lung transplantation.
de Winter, BC; Estenne, M; Guillemain, R; Kessler, R; Knoop, C; Marquet, P; Monchaud, C; Pison, C; Reynaud-Gaubert, M; Rousseau, A; Stern, M, 2012
)
0.59
" Determining the RGE of NFAT-regulated genes in leukocytes is a new pharmacodynamic approach to measure directly the functional consequences of calcineurin inhibition in T-lymphocytes."( Pharmacodynamic monitoring by residual NFAT-regulated gene expression in stable pediatric liver transplant recipients.
Billing, H; Breil, T; Engelmann, G; Giese, T; Schmidt, J; Schmitt, C; Schmitt, CP; Tönshoff, B, 2012
)
0.38
"We retrospectively examined the association of polymorphisms in the CYP3A, CYP2J2, CYP2C8, and ABCB1 genes with pharmacokinetic (PKs) and pharmacodynamic (PDs) parameters of tacrolimus in 103 renal transplant recipients for a period of 1 year."( Impact of genetic polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and the clinical outcome of renal transplantation.
Benitez, J; Caravaca, F; Cubero, JJ; Garcia, M; Gervasini, G; Macias, RM, 2012
)
0.85
"Mycophenolate mofetil is a commonly used immunosuppressant in heart transplantation but pharmacokinetic monitoring is not routinely done."( Pharmacokinetic monitoring of mycophenolic acid in heart transplant patients: correlation the side-effects and rejections with pharmacokinetic parameters.
Chojnowski, D; DeNofrio, D; Figurski, MJ; Goldberg, LR; Lake, KD; Nawrocki, A; Pawiński, T; Shaw, LM; Taylor, DO,
)
0.13
" The pharmacokinetic parameters, including dose administration, concentration and concentration to dose ratio were extracted and a meta-analysis was performed by using STATA10."( Meta-analysis of the effect of MDR1 C3435 polymorphism on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients.
Bai, Y; Cai, B; Chen, J; Hu, X; Li, Y; Liao, Y; Tang, J; Wang, L, 2012
)
0.62
" The overall results showed SNP C3435T could influence the pharmacokinetic parameters in different post transplant times, the subjects with CC genotype had lower concentration dose ratio and need higher tacrolimus dose than the CT and TT genotype."( Meta-analysis of the effect of MDR1 C3435 polymorphism on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients.
Bai, Y; Cai, B; Chen, J; Hu, X; Li, Y; Liao, Y; Tang, J; Wang, L, 2012
)
0.81
" This two-part pharmacokinetic interaction study evaluated boceprevir with cyclosporine (part 1) and tacrolimus (part 2)."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between the hepatitis C virus protease inhibitor boceprevir and cyclosporine and tacrolimus in healthy volunteers.
Butterton, J; Feng, HP; Gupta, S; Hulskotte, E; O'Mara, E; van Zutven, M; Wagner, J; Xuan, F, 2012
)
0.81
" The purpose of this study was to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of tacrolimus and evaluate the influence of clinical covariates, including the genetic polymorphisms of the cytochrome P450 3A5 gene (CYP3A5) and gene encoding P-glycoprotein (ABCB1), on the PK parameters in adult Korean kidney transplant recipients."( Prediction of the tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic parameters according to CYP3A5 genotype and clinical factors using NONMEM in adult kidney transplant recipients.
Ha, J; Han, N; Hong, JY; Hong, SH; Ji, E; Kim, IW; Kim, YS; Oh, JM; Shin, WG; Yun, HY, 2013
)
0.95
"To define and validate a pharmacokinetic (PK) model for tacrolimus (TAC) that includes patient pathophysiology and has clinical applicability in the first 2 weeks post-liver transplantation (PLT)."( Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in the early post-liver transplantation period and clinical applicability via Bayesian prediction.
Calvo, R; Gastaca, M; Leal, N; Lukas, JC; Ortiz de Urbina, J; Oteo, I; Suarez, E; Valdivieso, A, 2013
)
2.08
" The elimination half-life for individual patients varied over tenfold so that a large number of subjects were not at steady state, making the use of a PK model necessary to achieve rapidly and safely the target concentration for TAC in LT."( Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in the early post-liver transplantation period and clinical applicability via Bayesian prediction.
Calvo, R; Gastaca, M; Leal, N; Lukas, JC; Ortiz de Urbina, J; Oteo, I; Suarez, E; Valdivieso, A, 2013
)
1.83
" As there are no pharmacokinetic data available in pediatric kidney transplant recipients, the aims of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus(PR) in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients and to identify covariates that have a significant impacts on tacrolimus(PR) pharmacokinetics, including CYP3A5 polymorphism."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of once daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients.
Baudouin, V; Deschênes, G; Fakhoury, M; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Maisin, A; Storme, T; Zhao, W, 2013
)
0.8
" Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of once daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients.
Baudouin, V; Deschênes, G; Fakhoury, M; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Maisin, A; Storme, T; Zhao, W, 2013
)
0.61
"The pharmacokinetic data were best described by a one-compartment model with first order absorption and lag-time."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of once daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients.
Baudouin, V; Deschênes, G; Fakhoury, M; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Maisin, A; Storme, T; Zhao, W, 2013
)
0.61
"The population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus(PR) was developed and validated in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant patients."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of once daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients.
Baudouin, V; Deschênes, G; Fakhoury, M; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Maisin, A; Storme, T; Zhao, W, 2013
)
0.88
" A prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-period (14 days per period), two-sequence, crossover and steady-state pharmacokinetic study was undertaken to compare twice-daily generic tacrolimus (Sandoz) versus reference tacrolimus (Prograf®) in stable renal transplant patients."( A randomized pharmacokinetic study of generic tacrolimus versus reference tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.
Alloway, RR; Bloom, RD; Sadaka, B; Trofe-Clark, J; Wiland, A, 2012
)
0.83
" Pharmacodynamic monitoring offers a unique tool to evaluate the biologic effects of immunosuppressive drugs."( Pharmacodynamic analysis of tofacitinib and basiliximab in kidney allograft recipients.
Baan, CC; Chan, G; Kho, MM; Mol, WM; Quaedackers, ME; Vafadari, R; Weimar, W, 2012
)
0.38
"CYP3A5 genotypes of both recipient and donor were important factors influencing pharmacokinetic variability of tacrolimus."( Combinational effect of intestinal and hepatic CYP3A5 genotypes on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in recipients of living donor liver transplantation.
Cho, JY; Choi, L; Han, N; Ji, E; Oh, JM; Suh, KS, 2012
)
0.83
" As such, there is a potential for pharmacokinetic drug interaction."( The evaluation of potential pharmacokinetic interaction between sirolimus and tacrolimus in healthy volunteers.
Korth-Bradley, J; Matschke, K; Parks, V; Patat, A; Tortorici, MA, 2013
)
0.62
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed using noncompartmental methods and were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA)."( The evaluation of potential pharmacokinetic interaction between sirolimus and tacrolimus in healthy volunteers.
Korth-Bradley, J; Matschke, K; Parks, V; Patat, A; Tortorici, MA, 2013
)
0.62
"This study investigated pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic differences between a modified-release once-daily formulation of tacrolimus (Tac-QD) and the original formulation requiring twice-daily intake (Tac-BID) in de novo renal transplant recipients."( Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of once- and twice-daily tacrolimus in the early stage after renal transplantation.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Miura, M; Narita, S; Niioka, T; Numakura, K; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Tsuchiya, N, 2012
)
0.81
" The ABCB1 polymorphism was not associated with any pharmacokinetic parameters of Tac-QD."( Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of once- and twice-daily tacrolimus in the early stage after renal transplantation.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Miura, M; Narita, S; Niioka, T; Numakura, K; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Tsuchiya, N, 2012
)
0.61
" The mean tacrolimus AUC0-24, AUC0-∞ and Cmax for the POR 28 CC (n = 14) homozygotes in CYP3A5 expressers (CYP3A5 1/ 1 or 1/ 3 genotype) were 71."( Effect of the P450 oxidoreductase 28 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Chinese healthy male volunteers.
Ding, XL; Ma, S; Miao, LY; Zhang, H; Zhang, JJ, 2013
)
1.02
"Focusing on the genetic similarity of CYP3A subfamily enzymes (CYP3A4 and CYP3A5) between monkeys and humans, we have attempted to provide a single-species approach to predicting human hepatic clearance (CLh) of CYP3A4 substrates using pharmacokinetic parameters in cynomolgus monkeys following intravenous administrations."( A new approach to predicting human hepatic clearance of CYP3A4 substrates using monkey pharmacokinetic data.
Houjo, T; Ishigai, M; Kato, M; Ogawa, K, 2013
)
0.39
" Therefore, to prevent overexposure directly posttransplantation in HIV-infected patients on ritonavir-containing cART, the predictive value of a pretransplantation pharmacokinetic curve of tacrolimus was explored."( Pretransplantation pharmacokinetic curves of tacrolimus in HIV-infected patients on ritonavir-containing cART: a pilot study.
Crommelin, HA; Mudrikova, T; van den Broek, MP; van Maarseveen, EM; van Zuilen, AD, 2013
)
0.84
"A pretransplantation pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in these patients was developed, and a posttransplantation dosing advice was established for each individual patient."( Pretransplantation pharmacokinetic curves of tacrolimus in HIV-infected patients on ritonavir-containing cART: a pilot study.
Crommelin, HA; Mudrikova, T; van den Broek, MP; van Maarseveen, EM; van Zuilen, AD, 2013
)
0.91
" As the simulated pharmacokinetic curves lacked an absorption peak every 12 h, the mean 12 h-AUC was approximately 40 % lower compared with AUC's reported in HIV-negative recipients, when similar trough levels were targeted."( Pretransplantation pharmacokinetic curves of tacrolimus in HIV-infected patients on ritonavir-containing cART: a pilot study.
Crommelin, HA; Mudrikova, T; van den Broek, MP; van Maarseveen, EM; van Zuilen, AD, 2013
)
0.65
" Full pharmacokinetic profiles of sirolimus within a single dosing interval were collected."( Sirolimus pharmacokinetics in early postmyeloablative pediatric blood and marrow transplantation.
Bunin, N; Goyal, RK; Grupp, SA; Han, K; Mada, SR; Pulsipher, MA; Venkataramanan, R; Wall, DA, 2013
)
0.39
"To evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of sublingual and oral tacrolimus in the presence and absence of a drug that interacts with tacrolimus at the intestinal level."( Sublingual tacrolimus: a pharmacokinetic evaluation pilot study.
Amann, S; Aull, M; Benkert, S; Cremers, S; Dadhania, D; Delfin, M; Kapur, S; Levine, D; Saal, S; Tsapepas, D, 2013
)
1.01
" These findings should be investigated further in pharmacokinetic studies conducted in solid organ transplant recipients."( Sublingual tacrolimus: a pharmacokinetic evaluation pilot study.
Amann, S; Aull, M; Benkert, S; Cremers, S; Dadhania, D; Delfin, M; Kapur, S; Levine, D; Saal, S; Tsapepas, D, 2013
)
0.78
" There are significant pharmacokinetic interactions between TAC and AML."( Effect of amlodipine on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in rats.
Cheng, ZN; Li, J; Li, PJ; Liu, Z; Tan, HY; Wang, CJ; Yang, GP; Yang, M; Yuan, H; Zhang, BK; Zhou, LY; Zhou, YN; Zuo, XC, 2013
)
0.65
" On the contrary, significant changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of SN-38 were not observed."( [Effect of tacrolimus on the pharmacokinetics and glucuronidation of SN-38, an active metabolite of irinotecan].
Fujioka, M; Hasegawa, T; Katoh, M; Nadai, M; Onishi, K; Sakakibara, Y; Tanaka, Y, 2013
)
0.78
" Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between tacrolimus and amlodipine were evaluated in a randomized, 3-period, 6-sequence crossover study in healthy Chinese volunteers according to CYP3A5 genotype."( Effect of CYP3A5*3 polymorphism on pharmacokinetic drug interaction between tacrolimus and amlodipine.
Barrett, JS; Cheng, ZN; Guo, R; Li, J; Li, PJ; Li, ZJ; Liu, SK; Liu, Z; Ouyang, DS; Tan, HY; Wang, CJ; Wang, JL; Xie, YL; Yang, GP; Yuan, H; Zhang, BK; Zhou, LY; Zhou, YN; Zuo, XC, 2013
)
0.88
" The aim of this study was to examine the association between tacrolimus pharmacokinetic variability and CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genotypes by a population pharmacokinetic analysis based on routine drug monitoring data in adult renal transplant recipients."( Effects of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in Chinese adult renal transplant recipients: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.
Barrett, JS; Cheng, K; Deng, CH; Ding, JJ; Huang, ZJ; Jing, NN; Liao, HQ; Luo, AJ; Ming, YZ; Ng, CM; Pei, Q; Wu, D; Xi, LY; Yang, GP; Yuan, H; Zhang, BK; Zhou, YN; Zhu, LJ; Zuo, XC, 2013
)
0.89
"Based on our results, it may be concluded that CYP3A4FNx011B of recipient is an important factor influencing pharmacokinetic of tacrolimus, as patients with CYP3A4FNx011B polymorphism may require lower tacrolimus doses to maintain therapeutic levels."( Cytochrome P450 3A4FNx011B as pharmacogenomic predictor of tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and clinical outcome in the liver transplant recipients.
Albekairy, A; Alkatheri, A; Fujita, S; Hemming, A; Howard, R; Karlix, J; Reed, A,
)
0.58
"07 ng h/ml], a single intragastric administered dose of WZC increased the pharmacokinetic parameters of tacrolimus (C(max), 59."( Effects of traditional chinese medicine Wuzhi capsule on pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in rats.
Chen, W; Di, P; Feng, J; Li, J; Qian, X; Tao, X; Wei, H; Yang, Y, 2013
)
0.83
" It exhibits a narrow therapeutic index and large pharmacokinetic variability."( Multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2/ABCC2) haplotypes significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.
Akhlaghi, F; Chitnis, SD; Christians, U; Gohh, RY; Ogasawara, K, 2013
)
0.6
" Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling."( Multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2/ABCC2) haplotypes significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.
Akhlaghi, F; Chitnis, SD; Christians, U; Gohh, RY; Ogasawara, K, 2013
)
0.6
" In the population pharmacokinetic analysis, CYP3A5 expressers and MRP2 high-activity groups were identified as the significant covariates for tacrolimus apparent clearance expressed as 20."( Multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2/ABCC2) haplotypes significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.
Akhlaghi, F; Chitnis, SD; Christians, U; Gohh, RY; Ogasawara, K, 2013
)
0.8
" Elimination half-life was significantly lower in the SEDDM Tac group."( Pharmacokinetics of a self-microemulsifying drug delivery system of tacrolimus.
Gruber, M; Hirt, SW; Kunz, W; Lehle, K; Schmid, C; Touraud, D; von Suesskind-Schwendi, M, 2013
)
0.63
" Tacrolimus pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained on study Days 7, 14 and 28 (after dose adjustment)."( Conversion of twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus formulation in stable pediatric kidney transplant recipients: pharmacokinetics and efficacy.
Ahn, S; Ha, IS; Ha, J; Hong, HJ; Kang, HG; Kim, SJ; Kim, SM; Min, SI; Min, SK; Park, DD; Park, T, 2013
)
1.6
"To determine how changes in tacrolimus (TAC) immunosuppression clinical practice, in the first 15 days post liver transplantation (LT) and across a decade, impact a clinical covariate - pharmacokinetic (PK) model, developed in data from 1998, thus testing its utility in dose individualization across time."( Tacrolimus dose individualization in "de novo" patients after 10 years of experience in liver transplantation: pharmacokinetic considerations and patient pathophysiology.
Calvo, R; de Urbina, JO; Gastaca, M; Leal, N; Lukas, JC; Oteo, I; Suarez, E; Valdivieso, A; Valdivieso, N, 2013
)
2.13
" E-2007 existed in Cmin and Cmin/dose and in covariates AST (as hepatic function marker) and SCr (as toxicity marker)."( Tacrolimus dose individualization in "de novo" patients after 10 years of experience in liver transplantation: pharmacokinetic considerations and patient pathophysiology.
Calvo, R; de Urbina, JO; Gastaca, M; Leal, N; Lukas, JC; Oteo, I; Suarez, E; Valdivieso, A; Valdivieso, N, 2013
)
1.83
"To build a population pharmacokinetic model that describes the apparent clearance of tacrolimus and the potential demographic, clinical and genetically controlled factors that could lead to inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability within children following liver transplantation."( Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic analysis of tacrolimus in paediatric liver transplant patients.
Hawwa, AF; Jalil, MH; McElnay, JC; McKiernan, PJ; Shields, MD, 2014
)
0.87
" Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the non-linear mixed effects modelling program (nonmem) to determine the population mean parameter estimate of clearance and influential covariates."( Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic analysis of tacrolimus in paediatric liver transplant patients.
Hawwa, AF; Jalil, MH; McElnay, JC; McKiernan, PJ; Shields, MD, 2014
)
0.65
"Tacrolimus has a large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, and quantification of its effect is difficult."( Genetic polymorphisms in ABCB1 influence the pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus.
Baan, CC; Bouamar, R; Hesselink, DA; Kraaijeveld, R; Vafadari, R; van Gelder, T; van Schaik, RH; Weimar, W, 2013
)
2.07
" Intracellular interleukin (IL) 2 production in T cells was used to measure the pharmacodynamic effect of tacrolimus after phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate/ionomycin stimulation of whole blood."( Genetic polymorphisms in ABCB1 influence the pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus.
Baan, CC; Bouamar, R; Hesselink, DA; Kraaijeveld, R; Vafadari, R; van Gelder, T; van Schaik, RH; Weimar, W, 2013
)
0.84
"05), showing a smaller pharmacodynamic effect in CC genotype patients."( Genetic polymorphisms in ABCB1 influence the pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus.
Baan, CC; Bouamar, R; Hesselink, DA; Kraaijeveld, R; Vafadari, R; van Gelder, T; van Schaik, RH; Weimar, W, 2013
)
0.63
"The ABCB1 3435C>T SNP influences ABCB1 activity of T cells and the pharmacodynamic effect of tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients."( Genetic polymorphisms in ABCB1 influence the pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus.
Baan, CC; Bouamar, R; Hesselink, DA; Kraaijeveld, R; Vafadari, R; van Gelder, T; van Schaik, RH; Weimar, W, 2013
)
0.85
"We aimed to develop an accurate and convenient LSS for predicting MPA-AUC(0-12 hours) in Tunisian adult kidney transplant recipients whose immunosuppressive regimen consisted of MMF and tacrolimus combination with regards to the post-transplant period and the pharmacokinetic profile."( Limited sampling strategy of mycophenolic acid in adult kidney transplant recipients: influence of the post-transplant period and the pharmacokinetic profile.
Aouam, K; Ben Fredj, N; Boughattas, N; Chaabane, A; Chadly, Z; El May, M; Hammouda, M; Skhiri, H, 2013
)
0.58
" The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with a noncompartmental approach, and the relative bioavailability of both formulations was calculated according to standard statistical methods."( Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in adolescents with stable liver transplants: comparative pharmacokinetics and 1-year follow-up.
Almeida-Paulo, GN; Carcas-Sansuán, AJ; Díaz, C; Frauca, E; Frías-Iniesta, J; Hierro, L; Jara, P; Piñana, E; Tong, HY, 2013
)
0.39
" After the extraction of pharmacokinetic parameters from these studies, a meta-analysis was performed on the software STATA version 11."( The effect of ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism on pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in liver transplantation: a meta-analysis.
Cui, Z; Fan, LL; Fu, X; Li, C; Li, G; Liu, YY; Ma, J; Zhang, S, 2013
)
0.63
" However, the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters assessed in previous studies were limited on single time point whole blood trough concentrations (C0) during routine follow-up of the patient after transplantation."( Impact of CYP3A4*22 allele on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in early period after renal transplantation: toward updated genotype-based dosage guidelines.
Capron, A; De Meyer, M; De Pauw, L; Eddour, DC; Elens, L; Haufroid, V; Latinne, D; Mourad, M; van Schaik, RH; Wallemacq, P, 2013
)
0.68
"Our study investigates the impact of the CYP3A4*22 allele on Tac PK [C0, area under the time vs concentration curve (AUC0-12h), apparent clearance (Cl/F), Cmax, and dose requirement], time to achieve target C0, and creatinine clearance (CrCl) in 96 kidney transplant recipients considering the 2 first weeks after the graft."( Impact of CYP3A4*22 allele on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in early period after renal transplantation: toward updated genotype-based dosage guidelines.
Capron, A; De Meyer, M; De Pauw, L; Eddour, DC; Elens, L; Haufroid, V; Latinne, D; Mourad, M; van Schaik, RH; Wallemacq, P, 2013
)
0.68
" These patients showed reduced Tac Cl/F but higher dose-adjusted AUC0-12h and Cmax and were at increased risk of C0 > 20 ng/mL."( Impact of CYP3A4*22 allele on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in early period after renal transplantation: toward updated genotype-based dosage guidelines.
Capron, A; De Meyer, M; De Pauw, L; Eddour, DC; Elens, L; Haufroid, V; Latinne, D; Mourad, M; van Schaik, RH; Wallemacq, P, 2013
)
0.68
"Mycophenolic acid (MPA) and tacrolimus play important roles in immunosuppressive therapy after solid organ transplantation (Tx) and show large intra- and interindividual pharmacokinetic (PK) variabilities."( Tacrolimus exposure and mycophenolate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics early after liver transplantation.
Bergan, S; Bremer, S; Line, PD; Meltevik, TJ; Sæves, I; Tveit, RG; Vethe, NT, 2014
)
2.14
"This study describes PK and pharmacodynamic parameters of MPA and the PKs of tacrolimus in 16 liver transplant recipients, in 4 follow-up periods (I-IV)."( Tacrolimus exposure and mycophenolate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics early after liver transplantation.
Bergan, S; Bremer, S; Line, PD; Meltevik, TJ; Sæves, I; Tveit, RG; Vethe, NT, 2014
)
2.07
"A prospective, randomized study of 126 de novo renal transplant patients was conducted to compare the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles between GEN tacrolimus (n = 63) and REF tacrolimus (n = 63)."( Therapeutic equivalence and pharmacokinetics of generic tacrolimus formulation in de novo kidney transplant patients.
Ahn, C; Ahn, SH; Ha, J; Hong, H; Kim, SJ; Kim, SM; Kim, YS; Min, SI; Min, SK; Park, DD; Park, T, 2013
)
0.83
"The aims of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in adult kidney transplant recipients, to use this model to compare cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) genotype-based initial dosing of tacrolimus with standard per-kilogram-based dosing, and to predict the best starting dose of tacrolimus based on patient genotype to achieve a trough concentration between 6 and 10 µg/L by day 5 posttransplantation."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult kidney transplant patients: impact of CYP3A5 genotype on starting dose.
Barraclough, KA; Bergmann, TK; Hennig, S; Isbel, NM; Staatz, CE, 2014
)
0.92
"An exploratory, post hoc analysis was performed using data from a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-period (14 d per period), two-sequence, crossover, steady-state pharmacokinetic study comparing generic tacrolimus (Sandoz) vs."( A randomized, crossover pharmacokinetic study comparing generic tacrolimus vs. the reference formulation in subpopulations of kidney transplant patients.
Alloway, RR; Bloom, RD; Trofe-Clark, J; Wiland, A,
)
0.55
" Time kinetic analysis of NFAT1 inhibition in plasma from stable renal transplant recipients before and after an in vivo dose with tacrolimus correlated with the expected pharmacokinetic profile of tacrolimus."( Nuclear translocation of nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) as a quantitative pharmacodynamic parameter for tacrolimus.
Maguire, O; Minderman, H; O'Loughlin, KL; Tornatore, KM; Venuto, RC, 2013
)
0.8
"Data from routine therapeutic drug monitoring of 105 adult kidney transplant recipients were used for population pharmacokinetic analysis which was performed using a non-linear mixed-effects modeling."( Total plasma protein effect on tacrolimus elimination in kidney transplant patients--population pharmacokinetic approach.
Golubović, B; Kovačević, SV; Miljković, B; Prostran, M; Radivojević, D; Vučićević, K, 2014
)
0.69
" The ocular pharmacokinetic parameters in rabbits were determined and compared with that obtained after instillation of tacrolimus suspension."( Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and ocular tolerance of a microemulsion containing tacrolimus.
da Silva, GR; de Castro, WV; Fialho, SL; Silva-Cunha, A, 2014
)
0.83
"ng/mL) and Cmax (26."( Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and ocular tolerance of a microemulsion containing tacrolimus.
da Silva, GR; de Castro, WV; Fialho, SL; Silva-Cunha, A, 2014
)
0.63
" The purpose of this study was to establish a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacogenetic model of tacrolimus and identify covariates that affect pharmacokinetic parameters to prevent fluctuations in the tacrolimus trough concentration during the early period after transplantation."( Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacogenetic model of tacrolimus in the early period after kidney transplantation.
Ha, J; Ha, S; Han, N; Kim, IW; Kim, MG; Lee, JI; Min, SI; Oh, JM; Yun, HY, 2014
)
0.87
" Some pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated increased prednisolone exposure in patients on cyclosporine therapy compared with azathioprine, whereas other studies have found no difference."( Comparison of the influence of cyclosporine and tacrolimus on the pharmacokinetics of prednisolone in adult male kidney transplant recipients.
Barraclough, KA; Bergmann, TK; Campbell, SB; Isbel, NM; McWhinney, BC; Staatz, CE, 2014
)
0.66
"Adult male kidney transplant recipients treated with prednisolone and either cyclosporine or tacrolimus were recruited for pharmacokinetic blood sampling at the outpatient clinic at the Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia."( Comparison of the influence of cyclosporine and tacrolimus on the pharmacokinetics of prednisolone in adult male kidney transplant recipients.
Barraclough, KA; Bergmann, TK; Campbell, SB; Isbel, NM; McWhinney, BC; Staatz, CE, 2014
)
0.88
" Complete pharmacokinetic profiles from 56 patients (five occasions) were analyzed."( Pharmacokinetic modeling of enterohepatic circulation of mycophenolic acid in renal transplant recipients.
Andreu, F; Brunet, M; Caldés, A; Colom, H; Ekberg, H; Gentil, MA; Grinyó, JM; Kuypers, DR; Lloberas, N; Oppenheimer, F; Sanchez-Plumed, J; Torras, J, 2014
)
0.4
"The objectives of this study were to investigate pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic parameters during the conversion on a 1:1 (mg:mg) basis from a twice-daily (Prograf) to once-daily (Advagraf) tacrolimus formulation in pediatric kidney transplant recipients."( Conversion from twice- to once-daily tacrolimus in pediatric kidney recipients: a pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study.
Clermont, MJ; Kassir, N; Krajinovic, M; Lapeyraque, AL; Litalien, C; Phan, V; Théorêt, Y, 2014
)
0.86
"Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetic profiles were analyzed before and after conversion in 19 stable renal transplant recipients (age 7-19 years)."( Conversion from twice- to once-daily tacrolimus in pediatric kidney recipients: a pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study.
Clermont, MJ; Kassir, N; Krajinovic, M; Lapeyraque, AL; Litalien, C; Phan, V; Théorêt, Y, 2014
)
0.68
"Both AUC0-24 and Cmin decreased after conversion (223."( Conversion from twice- to once-daily tacrolimus in pediatric kidney recipients: a pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study.
Clermont, MJ; Kassir, N; Krajinovic, M; Lapeyraque, AL; Litalien, C; Phan, V; Théorêt, Y, 2014
)
0.68
" However, we observed a decrease in AUC0-24 and Cmin after the conversion, requiring close pharmacokinetic monitoring during the conversion period."( Conversion from twice- to once-daily tacrolimus in pediatric kidney recipients: a pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study.
Clermont, MJ; Kassir, N; Krajinovic, M; Lapeyraque, AL; Litalien, C; Phan, V; Théorêt, Y, 2014
)
0.68
"Due to considerable pharmacokinetic (PK) variability, immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) remains challenging."( Pharmacodynamic monitoring of nuclear factor of activated T cell-regulated gene expression in liver allograft recipients on immunosuppressive therapy with calcineurin inhibitors in the course of time and correlation with acute rejection episodes--a prospe
Giese, T; Hinz, U; Sandig, C; Sommerer, C; Steinebrunner, N; Stremmel, W; Zahn, A, 2014
)
0.4
" This implies finding a new gender-dependent predictable method for Tac exposure monitoring based on determination of the area under the time concentration curve (AUC)."( Gender-dependent predictable pharmacokinetic method for tacrolimus exposure monitoring in kidney transplant patients.
Catic-Djordjevic, A; Cvetkovic, T; Mikov, M; Mitic, B; Paunovic, G; Stefanovic, N; Velickovic-Radovanovic, R, 2015
)
0.66
" The aim of the current study was to evaluate the impact of these SNPs on the time required to attain target TAC levels and subsequent pharmacodynamic outcomes in pediatric kidney transplant patients."( The impact of genetic polymorphisms on time required to attain the target tacrolimus levels and subsequent pharmacodynamic outcomes in pediatric kidney transplant patients.
Shilbayeh, S, 2014
)
0.63
" Pharmacokinetic data are sparse."( Rectal and sublingual administration of tacrolimus: a single-dose pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers.
Christiaans, M; Neef, C; Scheffers, I; Stifft, F; van Bortel, L; Vanmolkot, F, 2014
)
0.67
" Main pharmacokinetic outcome parameters were compared by anova."( Rectal and sublingual administration of tacrolimus: a single-dose pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers.
Christiaans, M; Neef, C; Scheffers, I; Stifft, F; van Bortel, L; Vanmolkot, F, 2014
)
0.67
" This review focuses on the pharmacokinetic interactions and exposure-response relationships of mTOR inhibitors and tacrolimus (TAC), the most widely used CNI."( Focus on mTOR inhibitors and tacrolimus in renal transplantation: pharmacokinetics, exposure-response relationships, and clinical outcomes.
Christians, U; Kaplan, B; Shihab, F; Smith, L; Wellen, JR, 2014
)
0.9
"The objectives of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model for tacrolimus in paediatric liver transplant patients and determine optimal sampling strategies to estimate tacrolimus exposure accurately."( Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimation of tacrolimus exposure in paediatric liver transplant recipients.
Alvarez, F; Beaunoyer, M; Delaloye, JR; Kassir, N; Labbé, L; Lallier, M; Lapeyraque, AL; Litalien, C; Mouksassi, MS; Théorêt, Y, 2014
)
0.87
" Weight was included on all pharmacokinetic parameters."( Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimation of tacrolimus exposure in paediatric liver transplant recipients.
Alvarez, F; Beaunoyer, M; Delaloye, JR; Kassir, N; Labbé, L; Lallier, M; Lapeyraque, AL; Litalien, C; Mouksassi, MS; Théorêt, Y, 2014
)
0.65
"In a pharmacokinetic substudy of the randomized ASSET trial, 46 de novo kidney transplant patients receiving very low (1."( The pharmacokinetics of everolimus in de novo kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus: an analysis from the randomized ASSET study.
Christiaans, MH; Kovarik, JM; Pascual, J; Rostaing, L, 2014
)
0.63
"At month 12, mean values for tacrolimus trough concentration (C0), peak concentration (Cmax), and AUC0-12 in the very low tacrolimus group were approximately half that in the low tacrolimus group, but everolimus dose, C0, Cmax, and AUC0-12 were virtually identical in both groups."( The pharmacokinetics of everolimus in de novo kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus: an analysis from the randomized ASSET study.
Christiaans, MH; Kovarik, JM; Pascual, J; Rostaing, L, 2014
)
0.92
" Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling, including characterization of influential covariates."( Influence of donor-recipient CYP3A4/5 genotypes, age and fluconazole on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in pediatric liver transplantation: a population approach.
Baudet, H; Chardot, C; Debray, D; Elens, L; Girard, M; Guy-Viterbo, V; Haufroid, V; Lacaille, F; Musuamba, F; Reding, R; Wallemacq, P, 2014
)
0.63
"Although therapeutic drug monitoring has improved the clinical use of immunosuppressive drugs, there is still interpatient variability in efficacy and toxicity that pharmacodynamic monitoring may help to reduce."( Tacrolimus pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics along the calcineurin pathway in human lymphocytes.
Boumediene, A; Esperón, P; Gerona, S; Marquet, P; Noceti, OM; Taupin, JL; Touriño, C; Valverde, M; Woillard, JB, 2014
)
1.85
" Moreover, strong and statistically significant associations were found between tacrolimus pharmacodynamic parameters and polymorphisms in the genes coding cyclophilin A, the calcineurin catalytic subunit α isoenzyme, and CD25."( Tacrolimus pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics along the calcineurin pathway in human lymphocytes.
Boumediene, A; Esperón, P; Gerona, S; Marquet, P; Noceti, OM; Taupin, JL; Touriño, C; Valverde, M; Woillard, JB, 2014
)
2.07
"The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of multiple-trough sampling design and nonlinear mixed effect modeling (NONMEM) algorithm on the estimation of population and individual pharmacokinetic parameters."( [Effects of multiple-trough sampling design and algorithm on the estimation of population and individual pharmacokinetic parameters].
Ding, JJ; Jiao, Z; Ling, J; Qian, LX, 2014
)
0.4
"The aim was to develop a theory-based population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in adult kidney transplant recipients and to externally evaluate this model and two previous empirical models."( Improved prediction of tacrolimus concentrations early after kidney transplantation using theory-based pharmacokinetic modelling.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Bergmann, TK; Bremer, S; Hennig, S; Holford, N; Midtvedt, K; Staatz, CE; Størset, E, 2014
)
0.94
"A theory-based population pharmacokinetic model was superior to two empirical models for prediction of tacrolimus concentrations and seemed suitable for Bayesian prediction of tacrolimus doses early after kidney transplantation."( Improved prediction of tacrolimus concentrations early after kidney transplantation using theory-based pharmacokinetic modelling.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Bergmann, TK; Bremer, S; Hennig, S; Holford, N; Midtvedt, K; Staatz, CE; Størset, E, 2014
)
0.92
"Aim & patients & methods: This study investigated 24-h pharmacokinetic and CYP3A5 pharmacogenetic differences between once-daily tacrolimus (Tac-q."( Pharmacokinetic and CYP3A5 pharmacogenetic differences between once- and twice-daily tacrolimus from the first dosing day to 1 year after renal transplantation.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Komine, N; Miura, M; Narita, S; Niioka, T; Numakura, K; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Tsuchiya, N, 2014
)
0.83
" Good correlations were observed between the AUC₀₋₂₄ and Cmin for both formulations."( Pharmacokinetic and CYP3A5 pharmacogenetic differences between once- and twice-daily tacrolimus from the first dosing day to 1 year after renal transplantation.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Komine, N; Miura, M; Narita, S; Niioka, T; Numakura, K; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Tsuchiya, N, 2014
)
0.63
"These results suggested that the approximately 30% lower Cmin for Tac-q."( Pharmacokinetic and CYP3A5 pharmacogenetic differences between once- and twice-daily tacrolimus from the first dosing day to 1 year after renal transplantation.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Komine, N; Miura, M; Narita, S; Niioka, T; Numakura, K; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Tsuchiya, N, 2014
)
0.63
"To develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model of tacrolimus in healthy Chinese volunteers and liver transplant recipients for investigating the difference between the populations, and for potential individualized medication."( A population pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in healthy Chinese volunteers and liver transplant patients.
Li, L; Lu, W; Lu, YX; Ren, YP; Su, QH; Wu, KH; Zhou, TY, 2015
)
0.93
" The final model including two covariates, population (liver transplant recipients or volunteers) and serum ALT (alanine aminotransferase) level, was verified and adequately described the pharmacokinetic characteristics of tacrolimus."( A population pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in healthy Chinese volunteers and liver transplant patients.
Li, L; Lu, W; Lu, YX; Ren, YP; Su, QH; Wu, KH; Zhou, TY, 2015
)
0.87
" Therefore, we analyzed the relationship between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic of the CNIs CsA (n = 9) and Tac (n = 8) in stable renal transplant patients during a 12-h dosing period."( Relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplant patients.
Albring, A; Engler, H; Harz, N; Kribben, A; Lindemann, M; Schedlowski, M; Wendt, L; Wilde, B; Witzke, O, 2015
)
0.42
"Prospective monocentric observational pharmacokinetic (WB and intracellular concentrations)-pharmacodynamic (calcineurin activity) study."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients: inside the white blood cells.
Antignac, M; Bellissant, E; Blanchet, B; Boudjema, K; Camus, C; Curis, E; Dermu, M; Fernandez, C; Fillatre, P; Houssel-Debry, P; Latournerie, M; Le Priol, J; Lemaitre, F; Roussel, M; Verdier, MC; Zheng, Y, 2015
)
0.68
"Full intracellular TAC pharmacokinetic as well as calcineurin activity steady-state profiles is presented in the study."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients: inside the white blood cells.
Antignac, M; Bellissant, E; Blanchet, B; Boudjema, K; Camus, C; Curis, E; Dermu, M; Fernandez, C; Fillatre, P; Houssel-Debry, P; Latournerie, M; Le Priol, J; Lemaitre, F; Roussel, M; Verdier, MC; Zheng, Y, 2015
)
0.68
" Pharmacokinetic treatment with targeted intravenous busulfan combined with fludarabine (BuFlu) was developed as a preparative regimen for acute leukemia and myelodysplasia."( Myeloablative intravenous pharmacokinetically targeted busulfan plus fludarabine as conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Anasetti, C; Ayala, E; Figueroa, J; Kharfan-Dabaja, MA; Kim, J; Locke, F; Nishihori, T; Perkins, J; Riches, M; Yue, B, 2015
)
0.42
" Some fMPA and all MPAG pharmacokinetic parameters correlated negatively with creatinine clearance and positively with creatinine concentration, whereas no such correlation was observed for MPA."( Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate sodium co-administered with tacrolimus in the first year after renal transplantation.
Chrzanowska, M; Głyda, M; Resztak, M; Sobiak, J; Szczepaniak, P, 2016
)
0.67
"The aims of this study were (i) to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of tacrolimus in a Mexican renal transplant paediatric population (n = 53) and (ii) to test the influence of different covariates on its PK properties to facilitate dose individualization."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in Mexican paediatric renal transplant patients: role of CYP3A5 genotype and formulation.
Castañeda-Hernández, G; García-Roca, P; Jacobo-Cabral, CO; Medeiros, M; Reyes, H; Romero-Tejeda, EM; Trocóniz, IF, 2015
)
0.91
" The purpose of this study was to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of tacrolimus and evaluate the influence of clinical covariates, including the genetic polymorphisms of the cytochrome P450 3A5 gene (CYP3A5) and gene-encoding P-glycoprotein (ABCB1), on the PK parameters in Chinese adult liver transplant recipients."( Effects of CYP3A5 genotypes, ABCB1 C3435T and G2677T/A polymorphism on pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Chinese adult liver transplant patients.
Jing, Y; Li, G; Yang, J; Zhang, Y; Zhu, L, 2015
)
0.86
" This study evaluated whether a pharmacokinetic interaction exists between these agents."( Lack of a significant pharmacokinetic interaction between maraviroc and tacrolimus in allogeneic HSCT recipients.
Ganetsky, A; Hughes, ME; Miano, TA; Porter, DL; Reshef, R; Vonderheide, RH, 2015
)
0.65
" Forty-three traditional (non-compartmental) and five population pharmacokinetic studies were identified and evaluated."( Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Solid-Organ Transplant Patients.
Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2015
)
0.68
" The pharmacokinetic parameters (weight-adjusted tacrolimus daily dose and tacrolimus trough concentration/weight-adjusted tacrolimus daily dose ratio) were extracted, and the meta-analysis was performed using Stata 12."( Effects of the CYP3A4*1B Genetic Polymorphism on the Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients: A Meta-Analysis.
Shi, WL; Tang, HL; Zhai, SD, 2015
)
0.9
"Sixty-five tacrolimus- and 10 cyclosporine-treated renal transplant recipients underwent pharmacokinetic testing at day 7 and months 1, 3, 6 and 12 after transplantation, including 8-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for tacrolimus or cyclosporine and assessment of CYP3A4 activity using oral and intravenous midazolam (MDZ) drug probes."( Progressive decline in tacrolimus clearance after renal transplantation is partially explained by decreasing CYP3A4 activity and increasing haematocrit.
de Jonge, H; de Loor, H; Kuypers, DR; Vanhove, T; Verbeke, K, 2015
)
1.12
" This study was designed to assess therapeutic efficacy of tacrolimus in children with SRNS and its correlation with inter-dose area under concentration curve (AUC0-12 h) and trough concentration (C0)."( Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.
Agarwal, I; Chaturvedi, S; Fleming, D; Jahan, A; Mathew, B; Prabha, R, 2015
)
0.92
"79); and Cmax and AUC0-12 h (r = 0."( Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.
Agarwal, I; Chaturvedi, S; Fleming, D; Jahan, A; Mathew, B; Prabha, R, 2015
)
0.68
"The aims of this study were to assess the influence of the polymorphism of cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (POR) as well as other relevant genes (CYP3A4, CYP3A5, ABCB1) on individual variability of tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and perform population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in Chinese renal transplant recipients."( The genetic polymorphisms of POR*28 and CYP3A5*3 significantly influence the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Ding, XL; Liu, SB; Miao, LY; Xue, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, JJ, 2015
)
0.82
" Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM program."( The genetic polymorphisms of POR*28 and CYP3A5*3 significantly influence the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Ding, XL; Liu, SB; Miao, LY; Xue, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, JJ, 2015
)
0.63
" Additionally, population pharmacokinetic analysis identified that the combined genotype of CYP3A5-POR was the only covariant for the apparent clearance of tacrolimus (CL/F)."( The genetic polymorphisms of POR*28 and CYP3A5*3 significantly influence the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Ding, XL; Liu, SB; Miao, LY; Xue, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, JJ, 2015
)
0.83
" The population pharmacokinetic model showed that the combined genotype of CYP3A5-POR was associated with the CL/F of tacrolimus which might provide references for personalized use of tacrolimus in clinic."( The genetic polymorphisms of POR*28 and CYP3A5*3 significantly influence the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Ding, XL; Liu, SB; Miao, LY; Xue, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, JJ, 2015
)
0.84
" This regimen was associated with durable donor engraftment and relatively low rates of regimen related toxicity (RRT); future alemtuzumab pharmacokinetic studies may improve outcomes, by allowing targeted alemtuzumab clearance to reduce graft rejection and promote more rapid immune reconstitution."( Unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of non-malignant genetic diseases: An alemtuzumab based regimen is associated with cure of clinical disease; earlier clearance of alemtuzumab may be associated with graft rejection.
Abdel-Azim, H; Crooks, GM; Kapoor, N; Khazal, S; Kohn, DB; Mahadeo, KM; Shah, AJ; Zhao, Q, 2015
)
0.42
" Validated pharmacokinetic tools applied in clinical setting were used to simulate the steady-state pharmacokinetic profiles of the drug when given as the immediate-release formulation to renal transplant patients, being CYP3A5 expressors or not, and who have reached either a standard or a minimized exposure."( How to handle missed or delayed doses of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients? A pharmacokinetic investigation.
Bocquentin, F; Essig, M; Friedl, J; Marquet, P; Monchaud, C; Saint-Marcoux, F; Woillard, JB, 2015
)
0.68
" Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with patients of whom DNA was available (N = 49), and demographic factors, CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3, were tested as covariates."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of once daily tacrolimus formulation in stable liver transplant recipients.
den Hartigh, J; Guchelaar, HJ; Inderson, A; Moes, DJ; Olofsen, E; Swen, JJ; van der Bent, SA; van der Straaten, T; van Hoek, B; Verspaget, HW, 2016
)
0.67
"Several tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic models in adult renal transplant recipients have been established to facilitate dose individualization."( External evaluation of published population pharmacokinetic models of tacrolimus in adult renal transplant recipients.
Jiao, Z; Mao, JJ; Qiu, XY; Zhao, CY, 2016
)
1.1
" These drugs have narrow therapeutic index and show high pharmacokinetic variability."( Population Pharmacokinetic Approach of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Kidney Transplant Patients.
Golubovic, B; Grabnar, I; Miljkovic, B; Prostran, M; Radivojevic, D; Vucicevic, K, 2016
)
0.43
" In vivo pharmacokinetic studies were conducted in male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats."( Design, Characterization, and In Vivo Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus Proliposomes.
Betageri, GV; Nekkanti, V; Rueda, J; Wang, Z, 2016
)
0.68
"A pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and everolimus was not observed clinically in renal transplant patients."( Influence of everolimus on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Japanese renal transplant patients.
Akamine, Y; Habuchi, T; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Miura, M; Niioka, T; Numakura, K; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Yamamoto, R, 2016
)
0.96
"We analyzed the pharmacokinetic profile, efficacy, and security of Envarsus®."( Meltdose Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics.
Baraldo, M, 2016
)
0.85
"The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in paediatric patients at least 1 year after renal transplantation and simulate individualised dosage regimens."( The Effect of Weight and CYP3A5 Genotype on the Population Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Stable Paediatric Renal Transplant Recipients.
Bouts, AH; Cransberg, K; de Jong, H; de Wildt, SN; Mathôt, RA; Prytuła, AA; van Schaik, RH, 2016
)
0.89
"4 years) with 120 pharmacokinetic profiles performed over 2 to 4 h."( The Effect of Weight and CYP3A5 Genotype on the Population Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Stable Paediatric Renal Transplant Recipients.
Bouts, AH; Cransberg, K; de Jong, H; de Wildt, SN; Mathôt, RA; Prytuła, AA; van Schaik, RH, 2016
)
0.66
" The pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus were described using one- and two-compartment disposition models with first-order elimination in 61 and 39 % of population pharmacokinetic studies, respectively."( Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling and Bayesian Estimation of Tacrolimus Exposure: Is this Clinically Useful for Dosage Prediction Yet?
Brooks, E; Isbel, NM; Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2016
)
0.98
" The purpose of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and investigate the influence of clinical factors on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult Thai kidney transplant patients from routine data monitoring."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Thai kidney transplant patients: comparison with similar data from other populations.
Avihingsanon, Y; Praisuwan, S; Techawathanawanna, N; Treyaprasert, W; Vadcharavivad, S, 2016
)
0.92
" Clinical factors tested for influence on pharmacokinetic parameters were weight, haemoglobin, duration of tacrolimus therapy, prednisolone dose, serum albumin and estimated glomerular filtration rate."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Thai kidney transplant patients: comparison with similar data from other populations.
Avihingsanon, Y; Praisuwan, S; Techawathanawanna, N; Treyaprasert, W; Vadcharavivad, S, 2016
)
0.93
" The population pharmacokinetic equation that predicted CL/F of tacrolimus was CL/F = 21·5 × exp((-0·05 () (HB) ( - 11·8)))  × (DOT/125)(-0·06) , where CL/F was tacrolimus apparent oral clearance (L/h), HB was haemoglobin levels (g/dL), and DOT was duration of tacrolimus therapy (days)."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Thai kidney transplant patients: comparison with similar data from other populations.
Avihingsanon, Y; Praisuwan, S; Techawathanawanna, N; Treyaprasert, W; Vadcharavivad, S, 2016
)
0.96
"The first population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in Thai adult kidney transplant patients was developed and validated."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Thai kidney transplant patients: comparison with similar data from other populations.
Avihingsanon, Y; Praisuwan, S; Techawathanawanna, N; Treyaprasert, W; Vadcharavivad, S, 2016
)
0.98
"Prolonged-release tacrolimus was developed as a once-daily formulation with ethylcellulose as the excipient, resulting in slower release and reduction in peak concentration (Cmax ) for a given dose compared with immediate-release tacrolimus, which is administered twice daily."( Pharmacokinetics of prolonged-release tacrolimus and implications for use in solid organ transplant recipients.
Brown, M; First, MR; Fitzsimmons, WE; Keirns, J; Tanzi, MG; Undre, N, 2016
)
1.04
"This report summarizes phase 1 studies that evaluated pharmacokinetic interactions between the novel triazole antifungal agent isavuconazole and the immunosuppressants cyclosporine, mycophenolic acid, prednisolone, sirolimus, and tacrolimus in healthy adults."( Pharmacokinetic Assessment of Drug-Drug Interactions of Isavuconazole With the Immunosuppressants Cyclosporine, Mycophenolic Acid, Prednisolone, Sirolimus, and Tacrolimus in Healthy Adults.
Akhtar, S; Desai, A; Groll, AH; Han, D; Howieson, C; Kato, K; Kowalski, D; Lademacher, C; Lewis, W; Mandarino, D; Pearlman, H; Townsend, R; Yamazaki, T, 2017
)
0.84
" The success of these dosing recommendations was evaluated by analyzing pharmacokinetic data from liver transplant recipients in the CORAL-I study."( Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine in Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving 3 Direct-Acting Antivirals as Treatment for Hepatitis C Infection.
Awni, WM; Badri, PS; Coakley, EP; Ding, B; Dutta, S; Menon, RM; Parikh, A, 2016
)
0.76
"A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using tacrolimus dosing and Ctrough data before and during 3D treatment (n = 29)."( Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine in Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving 3 Direct-Acting Antivirals as Treatment for Hepatitis C Infection.
Awni, WM; Badri, PS; Coakley, EP; Ding, B; Dutta, S; Menon, RM; Parikh, A, 2016
)
1.01
"A one-compartment model with first-order absorption adequately described tacrolimus pharmacokinetic profiles during the first 4 weeks of 3D treatment."( Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine in Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving 3 Direct-Acting Antivirals as Treatment for Hepatitis C Infection.
Awni, WM; Badri, PS; Coakley, EP; Ding, B; Dutta, S; Menon, RM; Parikh, A, 2016
)
0.99
" The DDI risk in terms of increase in sirolimus area under the curve (AUC) was evaluated by a mechanistic model using in vitro inhibition data and published pharmacokinetic parameters of CNIs."( Risk Assessment of Drug-Drug Interactions of Calcineurin Inhibitors Affecting Sirolimus Pharmacokinetics in Renal Transplant Patients.
Emoto, C; Fukuda, T; Vinks, AA, 2016
)
0.43
"2-fold increase during the coadministration of tacrolimus, based on the reported Cmax values and doses of tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients."( Risk Assessment of Drug-Drug Interactions of Calcineurin Inhibitors Affecting Sirolimus Pharmacokinetics in Renal Transplant Patients.
Emoto, C; Fukuda, T; Vinks, AA, 2016
)
0.69
"This two-sequence, three-period crossover study is the first pharmacokinetic (PK) study to compare all three innovator formulations of tacrolimus (twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus capsules [IR-Tac]; once-daily extended-release tacrolimus capsules [ER-Tac]; novel once-daily tacrolimus tablets [LCPT])."( A Steady-State Head-to-Head Pharmacokinetic Comparison of All FK-506 (Tacrolimus) Formulations (ASTCOFF): An Open-Label, Prospective, Randomized, Two-Arm, Three-Period Crossover Study.
Alloway, RR; Nigro, V; Tremblay, S; Weinberg, J; Woodle, ES, 2017
)
0.89
"There were no significant correlations between the pharmacokinetic parameters of midazolam and urinary ratios of 6β-OHF/F."( Associations of the CYP3A5*3 and CYP3A4*1G polymorphisms with the pharmacokinetics of oral midazolam and the urinary 6β-hydroxycortisol/cortisol ratio as markers of CYP3A activity in healthy male Chinese.
Chan, SW; Chu, TT; Fok, BS; Hu, M; Lee, VH; Tomlinson, B; Xiao, Y; Yin, OQ, 2016
)
0.43
"There were no significant associations between midazolam pharmacokinetic parameters and urinary ratios of 6β-OHF/F and the two CYP3A polymorphisms were not associated with the urinary ratios of 6β-OHF/F or midazolam pharmacokinetic parameters."( Associations of the CYP3A5*3 and CYP3A4*1G polymorphisms with the pharmacokinetics of oral midazolam and the urinary 6β-hydroxycortisol/cortisol ratio as markers of CYP3A activity in healthy male Chinese.
Chan, SW; Chu, TT; Fok, BS; Hu, M; Lee, VH; Tomlinson, B; Xiao, Y; Yin, OQ, 2016
)
0.43
" The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of itraconazole (ITCZ) on tacrolimus absorption, distribution and metabolism by developing a semi-physiological pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in mice."( Use of a semi-physiological pharmacokinetic model to investigate the influence of itraconazole on tacrolimus absorption, distribution and metabolism in mice.
Bi, KS; Chen, XH; Lu, XF; Zhan, J; Zhou, Y, 2017
)
0.9
"Analysis of residual gene expression of the nuclear factor of activated T cell (NFAT)-regulated genes has been developed as a pharmacodynamic biomarker to monitor therapy with calcineurin inhibitors."( Analytical Validation and Cross-Validation of an NFAT-Regulated Gene Expression Assay for Pharmacodynamic Monitoring of Therapy With Calcineurin Inhibitors.
Abdel-Kahaar, E; Giese, T; Rieger, H; Shipkova, M; Sommerer, C; Wieland, E, 2016
)
0.43
" The reproducibility of the NFAT-regulated gene expression assay across laboratories can facilitate the implementation of this assay for pharmacodynamic routine monitoring of calcineurin inhibitors in different centers."( Analytical Validation and Cross-Validation of an NFAT-Regulated Gene Expression Assay for Pharmacodynamic Monitoring of Therapy With Calcineurin Inhibitors.
Abdel-Kahaar, E; Giese, T; Rieger, H; Shipkova, M; Sommerer, C; Wieland, E, 2016
)
0.43
"Tacrolimus, an immunosuppressive drug has a variable pharmacokinetic and poor oral bioavailability due to poor solubility."( Physicochemical, Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Characterization of Soluplus Stabilized Nanosuspension of Tacrolimus.
Minayian, M; Varshosaz, J; Yazdekhasti, S, 2017
)
2.11
" In vivo studies also showed tacrolimus nanoparticles significantly reduced the lymphocyte and WBC, enhanced 66 and 34 fold the AUC0-24 and Cmax of the drug, respectively."( Physicochemical, Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Characterization of Soluplus Stabilized Nanosuspension of Tacrolimus.
Minayian, M; Varshosaz, J; Yazdekhasti, S, 2017
)
0.96
"Although the proportion of elderly patients among renal transplant recipients has increased, pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of immunosuppressants rarely include older patients."( Longitudinal Pharmacokinetics of Everolimus When Combined With Low-level of Tacrolimus in Elderly Renal Transplant Recipients.
Agena, F; Coelho, V; David-Neto, E; de Almeida Rezende Ebner, P; Galante, NZ; Lemos, FBC; Ramos, F; Romano, P; Triboni, AHK, 2017
)
0.68
"2 ng/mL), Cmax (19."( Longitudinal Pharmacokinetics of Everolimus When Combined With Low-level of Tacrolimus in Elderly Renal Transplant Recipients.
Agena, F; Coelho, V; David-Neto, E; de Almeida Rezende Ebner, P; Galante, NZ; Lemos, FBC; Ramos, F; Romano, P; Triboni, AHK, 2017
)
0.68
"The aim of this study was to assess the differences in pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles after the 1:1 ratio-based conversion from a twice-daily to a once-daily tacrolimus formulation (TD-TAC and OD-TAC, respectively) in pediatric recipients of kidney transplants."( Pharmacokinetic Profile of Twice- and Once-daily Tacrolimus in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Aikawa, A; Hamasaki, Y; Hyodo, Y; Itabashi, Y; Kawamura, T; Muramatsu, M; Nihei, H; Shishido, S; Takahashi, Y; Yonekura, T,
)
0.58
"A number of studies were published with contradictory results comparing tacrolimus (Tac) and cyclosporine A (CsA) for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, but there are only few that accounted for pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters."( Pharmacokinetic comparison of cyclosporin A and tacrolimus in graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis.
Afanasyev, BV; Bondarenko, SN; Burmina, EA; Darskaya, EI; Moiseev, IS; Muslimov, AR; Pirogova, OV; Senina, NG; Tarakanova, YA, 2017
)
0.94
"Tacrolimus is characterized by a narrow therapeutic index and a considerable inter- and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability."( Tacrolimus population pharmacokinetics according to CYP3A5 genotype and clinical factors in Chinese adult kidney transplant recipients.
Fang, Y; Li, DY; Liu, TS; Zhang, HJ; Zhu, HJ, 2017
)
3.34
"Whether the combined use of probe drugs for CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein can clarify the relative contribution of these proteins to pharmacokinetic variability of a dual substrate like tacrolimus has never been assessed."( Fexofenadine, a Putative In Vivo P-glycoprotein Probe, Fails to Predict Clearance of the Substrate Tacrolimus in Renal Recipients.
Annaert, P; Bouillon, T; de Loor, H; Kuypers, D; Vanhove, T, 2017
)
0.86
" In this investigation, PBPK modeling was used to assess the impact of pregnancy on the pharmacokinetic profiles of three medications (metformin, tacrolimus, oseltamivir) using the Simcyp® simulator."( Application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict drug disposition in pregnant populations.
Avvari, S; Gollen, R; Jogiraju, VK; Taft, DR, 2017
)
0.66
" Thus far, however, no population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) analysis of tacrolimus in treating MG patients has been published."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in Chinese myasthenia gravis patients.
Chen, R; Chen, YS; Huang, L; Liu, ZQ; Lu, W; Ma, P; Wang, L; Zhou, TY; Zhu, X, 2017
)
0.96
" Conventional pharmacokinetic methods for immunosuppressive drug monitoring are not cell type-specific."( Pharmacodynamic Monitoring of Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression in CD14+ Monocytes After Kidney Transplantation.
Baan, CC; de Graav, GN; Dieterich, M; Hesselink, DA; Kannegieter, NM; Kraaijeveld, R; Leenen, PJM; Rowshani, AT, 2017
)
0.74
" This inhibition can be determined by phospho-specific flow cytometry, which enables the assessment of the pharmacodynamic effects of immunosuppressive drugs in a cell type-specific manner."( Pharmacodynamic Monitoring of Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression in CD14+ Monocytes After Kidney Transplantation.
Baan, CC; de Graav, GN; Dieterich, M; Hesselink, DA; Kannegieter, NM; Kraaijeveld, R; Leenen, PJM; Rowshani, AT, 2017
)
0.74
" Several population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models had been established for cyclosporine A and tacrolimus but no specific PopPK model was established for diltiazem."( Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Diltiazem in Chinese Renal Transplant Recipients.
Ding, JJ; Guan, XF; Li, DY; Ma, RR; Wang, JL; Yin, WJ; Zhou, LY; Zuo, XC, 2018
)
0.7
"A PopPK model of diltiazem is established in Chinese renal transplant recipients and it will provide relevant pharmacokinetic parameters of diltiazem for further pharmacokinetic interaction study."( Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Diltiazem in Chinese Renal Transplant Recipients.
Ding, JJ; Guan, XF; Li, DY; Ma, RR; Wang, JL; Yin, WJ; Zhou, LY; Zuo, XC, 2018
)
0.48
"Scrupulous comparison of the pharmacokinetic and clinical characteristics of generic tacrolimus formulations versus the reference drug (Prograf) is essential."( Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Outcomes of Generic Tacrolimus (Hexal) Versus Branded Tacrolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial.
Arns, W; Baeumer, D; Budde, K; Hansen, A; Huppertz, A; Klein, T; Kroeger, I; Lehner, LJ; Rath, T; Rump, LC; Schenker, P; Shipkova, M; Sieder, C; Ziefle, S, 2017
)
0.93
"The objectives of this study were to determine the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus immediately after kidney transplantation and to find relevant parameters for dose individualization using a population pharmacokinetic analysis."( A Population Pharmacokinetic Model to Predict the Individual Starting Dose of Tacrolimus Following Pediatric Renal Transplantation.
Andrews, LM; Brüggemann, RJM; Cornelissen, EAM; Cransberg, K; de Wildt, SN; de Winter, BCM; Hesselink, DA; Koch, BCP; van Gelder, T; van Schaik, RHN, 2018
)
0.94
" We aimed to predict the contribution of schisantherin A and schisandrin A to drug-drug interaction (DDI) between Wuzhi capsule and tacrolimus using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling."( Prediction of Drug-Drug Interaction between Tacrolimus and Principal Ingredients of Wuzhi Capsule in Chinese Healthy Volunteers Using Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling.
Bu, F; Cai, W; Jiao, Z; Li, L; Lin, HS; Ma, G; Shin, JG; Xiang, X; Zhang, H; Zhuang, X, 2018
)
0.95
" However, the pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and fentanyl is unclear."( Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Tacrolimus and Fentanyl in Patients Receiving Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
Fuchida, SI; Hatsuse, M; Kado, Y; Kitazawa, F; Kokufu, T; Murakami, S; Nakayama, Y; Okano, A; Shimazaki, C; Takara, K; Ueda, K, 2017
)
0.98
" Areas covered: Current methods of monitoring Tac treatment, focusing on traditional therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), controversies surrounding TDM, novel matrices, pharmacogenetic and pharmacodynamic monitoring are discussed."( Pharmacokinetic considerations related to therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients.
Andrews, LM; Baan, CC; De Winter, BCM; Hesselink, DA; Li, Y; Shi, YY; Van Gelder, T, 2017
)
0.69
"We assessed the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic impact of converting stable simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) recipients from standard tacrolimus (Prograf) to long-acting tacrolimus (Advagraf)."( Randomized open-label crossover assessment of Prograf vs Advagraf on immunosuppressant pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in simultaneous pancreas-kidney patients.
Cattral, M; Knauer, MJ; Luke, PP; Luke, S; Muirhead, N; Norgate, A; Schiff, J, 2018
)
0.68
" A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) absorption model was developed to predict the impact of crystallinity extent on the oral absorption of the products and to evaluate the discriminatory ability of the different dissolution methods."( Investigating the Impact of Drug Crystallinity in Amorphous Tacrolimus Capsules on Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Using Discriminatory In Vitro Dissolution Testing and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation.
Chow, ECY; Gao, Y; Purohit, HS; Sun, DD; Taylor, LS; Trasi, NS; Wen, H; Zhang, X, 2018
)
0.72
" The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and pharmacokinetic interactions between EBR and GZR and single doses of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone."( Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Elbasvir/Grazoprevir and Immunosuppressant Drugs in Healthy Volunteers.
Butterton, JR; Caro, L; Fandozzi, CM; Feng, HP; Guo, Z; Iwamoto, M; Panebianco, D; Talaty, J; Wolford, D; Yeh, WW, 2018
)
0.68
" This system determines the area under the curve (AUC) of the drug by pharmacokinetic modeling and Bayesian estimation."( Pharmacokinetic Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Advagraf in More Than 500 Adult Renal Transplant Patients, Using an Expert System Online.
Bedu, A; Cassuto, E; Essig, M; Etienne, I; Kamar, N; Marquet, P; Monchaud, C; Moulin, B; Rérolle, JP; Saint-Marcoux, F; Woillard, JB, 2018
)
0.48
"This study improves our knowledge of Advagraf pharmacokinetic variability and relations between exposure indices and the scientific background of the expert service provided through the ISBA Web site."( Pharmacokinetic Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Advagraf in More Than 500 Adult Renal Transplant Patients, Using an Expert System Online.
Bedu, A; Cassuto, E; Essig, M; Etienne, I; Kamar, N; Marquet, P; Monchaud, C; Moulin, B; Rérolle, JP; Saint-Marcoux, F; Woillard, JB, 2018
)
0.48
" However, pharmacokinetic data in children with nephrotic syndrome is limited."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children with nephrotic syndrome.
Hao, GX; Huang, X; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Li, Y; Shi, HY; Zhang, DF; Zhao, W; Zheng, Y, 2018
)
0.77
"Tacrolimus exhibits inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability attributed to CYP3A5 isoenzymes and the efflux transporter, P-glycoprotein."( Tacrolimus Population Pharmacokinetics and Multiple CYP3A5 Genotypes in Black and White Renal Transplant Recipients.
Brazeau, D; Campagne, O; Mager, DE; Tornatore, KM; Venuto, RC, 2018
)
3.37
" In the present study, we evaluated the proof of concept of a VAMS device by comparing the pharmacokinetic data of tacrolimus in rats among dried blood in VAMS, wet blood, and plasma."( Application of a Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling Device to a Pharmacokinetic Study of Tacrolimus in Rats: Comparison with Wet Blood and Plasma.
Kita, K; Mano, Y; Noritake, K, 2019
)
0.95
" However, pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable among the three matrices."( Application of a Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling Device to a Pharmacokinetic Study of Tacrolimus in Rats: Comparison with Wet Blood and Plasma.
Kita, K; Mano, Y; Noritake, K, 2019
)
0.74
"Collectively, these findings suggest that the VAMS device can be a useful device for pharmacokinetic studies in rats."( Application of a Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling Device to a Pharmacokinetic Study of Tacrolimus in Rats: Comparison with Wet Blood and Plasma.
Kita, K; Mano, Y; Noritake, K, 2019
)
0.74
" Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were compared to assess both the impact of steady-state SCY-078 on tacrolimus and the impact of tacrolimus on the PK of steady-state SCY-078."( Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Drug-Drug Interaction Potential for Coadministered SCY-078, an Oral Fungicidal Glucan Synthase Inhibitor, and Tacrolimus.
Angulo, D; Atiee, G; Corr, C; Hyman, M; Murphy, G; Willett, M; Wring, S, 2019
)
0.93
" Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were compared with previously reported data using the TD formulation."( Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Once-Daily Tacrolimus Compared With Twice-Daily Tacrolimus in the Early Stage After Living Donor Liver Transplantation.
Fukatsu, S; Fukudo, M; Hashi, S; Iwasaki, M; Kaido, T; Masuda, S; Matsubara, K; Nakagawa, S; Sugimoto, M; Uemoto, S; Yamamoto, Y; Yano, I; Yonezawa, A, 2018
)
0.73
" The apparent clearance and the pharmacodynamic parameters examined were not significantly different between the OD and TD groups."( Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Once-Daily Tacrolimus Compared With Twice-Daily Tacrolimus in the Early Stage After Living Donor Liver Transplantation.
Fukatsu, S; Fukudo, M; Hashi, S; Iwasaki, M; Kaido, T; Masuda, S; Matsubara, K; Nakagawa, S; Sugimoto, M; Uemoto, S; Yamamoto, Y; Yano, I; Yonezawa, A, 2018
)
0.73
"The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profile, tolerability, and safety of a novel once-daily extended-release formulation of tacrolimus (LCPT) with that of once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (ODT) in stable adult lung transplant (LT) recipients."( Pharmacokinetic Study of Conversion Between 2 Formulations of Once-daily Extended-release Tacrolimus in Stable Lung Transplant Patients.
Berastegui, C; Bravo, C; Gómez-Ollés, S; López-Meseguer, M; Monforte, V; Roman, A; Sáez-Giménez, B; Sintes, H; Vima, J, 2018
)
0.9
"Phase II, open-label, single-arm, single-center, prospective pilot pharmacokinetic study."( Pharmacokinetic Study of Conversion Between 2 Formulations of Once-daily Extended-release Tacrolimus in Stable Lung Transplant Patients.
Berastegui, C; Bravo, C; Gómez-Ollés, S; López-Meseguer, M; Monforte, V; Roman, A; Sáez-Giménez, B; Sintes, H; Vima, J, 2018
)
0.7
" However, the predictive performance of population pharmacokinetic (PK) models of tacrolimus should be evaluated prior to their implementation in clinical practice."( Evaluating tacrolimus pharmacokinetic models in adult renal transplant recipients with different CYP3A5 genotypes.
Ding, JJ; Hu, C; Li, DY; Liu, K; Ma, RR; Wang, JL; Yin, WJ; Zhou, G; Zhou, LY; Zuo, XC, 2018
)
1.1
"To develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of tacrolimus in Chinese Han renal transplant population and establish the influence of different covariates (especially different CYP3A5/3A4/POR genotype) on PK properties."( Tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic models according to CYP3A5/CYP3A4/POR genotypes in Chinese Han renal transplant patients.
Cao, D; Duan, Z; Peng, H; Wei, X; Wen, J; Xue, L; Zheng, X; Zhu, W, 2018
)
2.17
" The pharmacokinetic profile of tacrolimus was examined before and after the discontinuation of clotrimazole and in patients with different CYP3A5 genotypes."( Effects of clotrimazole on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in patients with heart transplants with different CYP3A5 genotypes.
Hosomi, K; Kawase, A; Matsuda, S; Oita, A; Takada, M; Terada, Y; Terakawa, N; Uno, T; Wada, K; Yokoyama, S, 2019
)
1.09
"The aim of this study was to perform a population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in Mexican adult kidney transplant patients to analyse the influence of clinical and genetic covariates to propose a dosage regimen."( Dosing recommendations based on population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Mexican adult patients with kidney transplant.
Isordia-Segovia, J; Medellín-Garibay, SE; Milán-Segovia, RDC; Niño-Moreno, PDC; Reséndiz-Galván, JE; Romano-Moreno, S, 2019
)
0.98
"Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor, is a common immunosuppressant prescribed after organ transplantation and has notable inter- and intrapatient pharmacokinetic variability."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Transplant Recipients: What Did We Learn About Sources of Interindividual Variabilities?
Campagne, O; Mager, DE; Tornatore, KM, 2019
)
2.24
" The primary objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a population pharmacokinetic model characterizing immediate-release oral tacrolimus co-administered with mycophenolate mofetil (a pro-drug of mycophenolic acid) in adult kidney transplant recipients on corticosteroid-free regimens."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Immediate-Release Oral Tacrolimus Co-administered with Mycophenolate Mofetil in Corticosteroid-Free Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Ensom, MHH; Kiang, TKL; Mayo, P; Rong, Y, 2019
)
0.96
"We have developed and internally evaluated a novel population pharmacokinetic model for tacrolimus co-administered with mycophenolate mofetil in corticosteroid-free adult kidney transplant patients."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Immediate-Release Oral Tacrolimus Co-administered with Mycophenolate Mofetil in Corticosteroid-Free Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Ensom, MHH; Kiang, TKL; Mayo, P; Rong, Y, 2019
)
0.98
" Sustained-release tacrolimus (SRT) was developed as a once-daily formulation, resulting in slower release and reduction in peak concentration compared with twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IRT)."( Sustained-Release Tacrolimus Stabilizes Decline of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Through Decreasing Fluctuation of Its Trough Blood Level.
Akiba, M; Eba, S; Hoshi, F; Matsuda, Y; Niikawa, H; Noda, M; Oishi, H; Okada, Y; Sado, T; Sakurada, A; Watanabe, T, 2018
)
1.14
" Besides, for reducing the consumption of rabbits and the variation of the data, we designed a consecutive sampling method in pharmacokinetic study, with only seven rabbits consumed for each formulation."( Pharmacokinetic study of sirolimus ophthalmic formulations by consecutive sampling and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Shi, M; Tang, Z; Wang, L; Wang, Q, 2019
)
0.51
" A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling."( A population pharmacokinetic model to predict the individual starting dose of tacrolimus in adult renal transplant recipients.
Andrews, LM; de Fijter, JW; de Winter, BCM; Elens, L; Hesselink, DA; Lloberas, N; Moes, DJAR; van Gelder, T; van Schaik, RHN, 2019
)
0.74
" According to pharmacokinetic model estimates, the inter- and intra-individual variabilities in bioavailability following IM injection were remarkably reduced compared with those following oral administration."( Reduced variability in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics following intramuscular injection compared to oral administration in cynomolgus monkeys: Investigating optimal dosing regimens.
Gershkovich, P; Kim, KS; Kim, SJ; Kim, TH; Lee, JB; Lee, KW; Park, JB; Shin, BS; Shin, S; Yoo, SD, 2019
)
0.82
"Various mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models have been developed to describe its PK characteristics and facilitate its optimal dosing in adult kidney transplant recipients co-administered with tacrolimus."( Systematic external evaluation of published population pharmacokinetic models of mycophenolate mofetil in adult kidney transplant recipients co-administered with tacrolimus.
Deng, RH; Fu, Q; Jiao, Z; Li, J; Liu, LS; Liu, YF; Luo, B; Sheng, CC; Wang, CX; Zhang, HX; Zhao, Q, 2019
)
0.89
"The aims of this study were to investigate the population pharmacokinetic (PPK) characteristics of tacrolimus in Chinese children with nephrotic syndrome and to apply it in clinical practice."( Population pharmacokinetics and dosage optimization of tacrolimus in pediatric patients with nephrotic syndrome
.
Chen, C; Cui, Y; Ding, J; Han, Y; Ma, L; Su, B; Wang, F; Wang, X; Xiao, H; Yao, Y; Zhou, Y, 2019
)
0.98
" The final model could be used to accurately predict tacrolimus individual pharmacokinetic parameters and assist in dosage optimization."( Population pharmacokinetics and dosage optimization of tacrolimus in pediatric patients with nephrotic syndrome
.
Chen, C; Cui, Y; Ding, J; Han, Y; Ma, L; Su, B; Wang, F; Wang, X; Xiao, H; Yao, Y; Zhou, Y, 2019
)
1.01
"The objective of this study was to merge genetic and non-genetic factors of tacrolimus pharmacokinetics to establish a more stable population pharmacokinetic model for individualized dosage regimen in Chinese nephrotic syndrome patients."( Dosage Optimization Based on Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Tacrolimus in Chinese Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome.
Huang, X; Lu, T; Wang, Z; Xu, S; Zhao, L; Zhao, M; Zhu, X, 2019
)
0.98
"A new population pharmacokinetic model was established to describe the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in nephrotic syndrome patients, which can be used to select rational dosage regimens to achieve a desirable whole-blood concentration."( Dosage Optimization Based on Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Tacrolimus in Chinese Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome.
Huang, X; Lu, T; Wang, Z; Xu, S; Zhao, L; Zhao, M; Zhu, X, 2019
)
0.97
"The pharmacokinetic data were adequately described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination."( Prediction of tacrolimus dosage in the early period after heart transplantation: a population pharmacokinetic approach.
Cai, J; Han, Y; Huang, J; Liu, YN; Shi, SJ; Zhang, J; Zhang, Y; Zhou, H, 2019
)
0.87
"This is the first population pharmacokinetic study conducted in Chinese heart transplant recipients."( Prediction of tacrolimus dosage in the early period after heart transplantation: a population pharmacokinetic approach.
Cai, J; Han, Y; Huang, J; Liu, YN; Shi, SJ; Zhang, J; Zhang, Y; Zhou, H, 2019
)
0.87
"Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling allows assessment of the covariates contributing to the large pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of tacrolimus; these include multiple physiological and biochemical differences among patients."( A Theoretical Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Approach to Ascertain Covariates Explaining the Large Interpatient Variability in Tacrolimus Disposition.
Alloway, RR; Christians, U; Emoto, C; Fukuda, T; Hahn, D; Johnson, TN; Vinks, AA, 2019
)
0.92
" Several tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients have been set up to recommend an optimal dosage schedule."( Population pharmacokinetics and dosing regimen optimization of tacrolimus in Chinese pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients.
Chen, X; Li, Z; Wang, D; Xu, H, 2020
)
1.21
" A tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic model, including identification of significant covariates, was developed using NONMEM."( Population pharmacokinetics of immediate- and prolonged-release tacrolimus formulations in liver, kidney and heart transplant recipients.
Bonate, P; Keirns, J; Lu, Z, 2019
)
1.37
"This population pharmacokinetic model described data from transplant recipients who received IR-T and/or PR-T."( Population pharmacokinetics of immediate- and prolonged-release tacrolimus formulations in liver, kidney and heart transplant recipients.
Bonate, P; Keirns, J; Lu, Z, 2019
)
0.75
"Tacrolimus is a narrow therapeutic range drug that requires fine dose adjustment, for which pharmacokinetic (PK) models have been amply proposed in renal, but not in liver, transplant recipients."( Population pharmacokinetic model and Bayesian estimator for 2 tacrolimus formulations in adult liver transplant patients.
Debord, J; Marquet, P; Monchaud, C; Riff, C; Woillard, JB, 2019
)
2.2
" Pharmacokinetic model fitting and Bayesian estimation were performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM) and SPSS was used to examine the effect of body composition on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics."( Impact of body composition on pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in liver transplantation recipients.
Chen, L; Li, M; Liu, Y; Lu, X; Tan, G; Zhu, L, 2020
)
1
" Optimal pharmacokinetic models were selected based on objective function values, standard errors, and biological plausibility."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid Co-Administered with Tacrolimus in Corticosteroid-Free Adult Kidney Transplant Patients.
Ensom, MHH; Kiang, TKL; Mayo, P; Rong, Y, 2019
)
0.75
" MATERIAL AND METHODS In this sub-study of the DIAMOND randomized controlled trial of prolonged-release tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients, we investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of prolonged-release tacrolimus when administered via nasogastric tube immediately post-transplant."( Pharmacokinetic Profile of Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus When Administered via Nasogastric Tube in De Novo Liver Transplantation: A Sub-Study of the DIAMOND Trial.
Baccarani, U; Britz, R; Popescu, I; Undre, N, 2019
)
0.99
" In this study, we constructed a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model adapted to the clinical data and evaluated the contribution of liver regeneration as well as hepatic and intestine CYP3A5 genotypes on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics."( A Minimal Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Tacrolimus in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Perspectives Related to Liver Regeneration and the cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) Genotype.
Itohara, K; Kaido, T; Matsubara, K; Nakagawa, S; Okajima, H; Tsuzuki, T; Uemoto, S; Uesugi, M; Yano, I; Yonezawa, A, 2019
)
0.94
" Post-transplant patients underwent three pharmacokinetic assessments over 14 days."( A randomized, open-label pharmacokinetic trial of tacrolimus extended-release dosing in obese de novo kidney transplant recipients.
Benedetti, E; Brandt, S; Huang, YJ; Jasiak-Panek, NM; Patel, S; Progar, K; Thielke, JJ; Wenzler, E; West-Thielke, PM, 2019
)
0.77
" Pharmacokinetic data on both calcineurin inhibitors and direct-acting antiviral exposure in liver transplant recipients remain sparse."( Comparison of the effect of direct-acting antiviral with and without ribavirin on cyclosporine and tacrolimus clearance values: results from the ANRS CO23 CUPILT cohort.
Barrail-Tran, A; Botta-Fridlund, D; Cagnot, C; Canva, V; Coilly, A; Conti, F; D'Alteroche, L; Danjou, H; De Ledinghen, V; Duclos-Vallée, JC; Durand, F; Duvoux, C; Fougerou-Leurent, C; Gelé, T; Goldwirt, L; Houssel-Debry, P; Kamar, N; Laforest, C; Lavenu, A; Leroy, V; Moreno, C; Pageaux, GP; Radenne, S; Samuel, D; Taburet, AM, 2019
)
0.73
" Limited sampling strategies in combination with population pharmacokinetic model-derived Bayesian estimators (popPK-BE) may accurately predict individual AUC."( Tacrolimus Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Monitoring, Using Home-Based Volumetric Absorptive Capillary Microsampling.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Gustavsen, MT; Midtvedt, K; Robertsen, I; Vethe, NT, 2020
)
2
"A single-center prospective pharmacokinetic study was conducted in standard-risk RTxR (n = 27) receiving Tac twice daily."( Tacrolimus Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Monitoring, Using Home-Based Volumetric Absorptive Capillary Microsampling.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Gustavsen, MT; Midtvedt, K; Robertsen, I; Vethe, NT, 2020
)
2
" A prospective, single-dose pharmacokinetic study was performed, prior to and after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, for tacrolimus, extended-release tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium."( Prospective study of the changes in pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive medications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
Boutin, L; Chan, G; du Souich, P; Elftouh, N; Garneau, PY; Hajjar, R; Lafrance, JP; Michaud, J; Pichette, V, 2020
)
0.77
" The effectiveness, safety and pharmacokinetic data of tacrolimus in the treatment of glomerular diseases in children are reviewed in this paper to provide evidence to support its rational use in clinical practice."( Off-label use of tacrolimus in children with glomerular disease: Effectiveness, safety and pharmacokinetics.
Hao, GX; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Song, LL; Su, LQ; Zhang, DF; Zhao, W, 2020
)
1.15
"We conducted a pharmacokinetic study in 30 thoracic organ transplants at intensive care at the University Medical Center Utrecht in the first week post-transplantation."( High Variability of Whole-Blood Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics Early After Thoracic Organ Transplantation.
De Lange, DW; Grutters, JC; Huitema, ADR; Hunault, CC; Kesecioglu, J; Kirkels, JH; Sikma, MA; Van de Graaf, EA; Van Maarseveen, EM; Verhaar, MC, 2020
)
0.84
" The physiological and pharmacokinetic changes are outlined."( Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Impact of Hematocrit on Monitoring and Dosing of Tacrolimus Early After Heart and Lung Transplantation.
De Lange, DW; Huitema, ADR; Hunault, CC; Sikma, MA; Van Maarseveen, EM, 2020
)
0.79
" However, pharmacokinetic data on unbound concentrations are not available."( Unbound Plasma, Total Plasma, and Whole-Blood Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics Early After Thoracic Organ Transplantation.
De Lange, DW; Grutters, JC; Huitema, ADR; Hunault, CC; Kesecioglu, J; Kirkels, JH; Moreno, JM; Sikma, MA; Van de Graaf, EA; Van Maarseveen, EM; Verhaar, MC, 2020
)
0.82
" Pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling."( Unbound Plasma, Total Plasma, and Whole-Blood Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics Early After Thoracic Organ Transplantation.
De Lange, DW; Grutters, JC; Huitema, ADR; Hunault, CC; Kesecioglu, J; Kirkels, JH; Moreno, JM; Sikma, MA; Van de Graaf, EA; Van Maarseveen, EM; Verhaar, MC, 2020
)
0.82
"Nuclear factor of activated T cell-regulated gene expression (NFAT-RGE) has been proposed as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for tacrolimus (Tac) and cyclosporine (CsA)."( Nuclear factor of activated T cells as potential pharmacodynamic biomarker for the risk of acute and subclinical rejection in de novo liver recipients.
Brunet, M; Fortuna, V; Millán, O; Navasa, M; Ruiz, P, 2020
)
0.76
"Tacrolimus is the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation (KT), but its use is complicated by a narrow therapeutic index and high inter- and intra-patient pharmacokinetic variability."( Optimization of tacrolimus in kidney transplantation: New pharmacokinetic perspectives.
Bestard, O; Budde, K; Furian, L; Maggiore, U; Oberbauer, R; Pascual, J; Rostaing, L, 2020
)
2.35
"Postmarketing population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies can be useful to capture patient characteristics affecting PK or PD in real-world settings."( Development of a System for Postmarketing Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies Using Real-World Data From Electronic Health Records.
Abou-Khalil, BW; Beck, C; Bejan, CA; Birdwell, KA; Choi, L; Denny, JC; James, NT; McNeer, E; Niu, X; Roden, DM; Stein, CM; Van Driest, SL; Weeks, HL; Williams, ML, 2020
)
0.56
"Diverse tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models in adult liver transplant recipients have been established to describe the PK characteristics of tacrolimus in the last two decades."( Systematic external evaluation of published population pharmacokinetic models for tacrolimus in adult liver transplant recipients.
Cai, X; Jiao, Z; Li, J; Li, R; Qiu, X; Shen, C; Sheng, C; Tao, Y; Wang, Z; Zhang, Q; Zhang, X, 2020
)
1.22
" Complete pharmacokinetic profiles (Predose, and 20 min, 40 min, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 12h post drug intake) of twice daily TAC in whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were collected in 32 liver transplanted patients in the first ten days post transplantation."( Pharmacogenetic-Whole blood and intracellular pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PG-PK2-PD) relationship of tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients.
Balakirouchenane, D; Bellissant, E; Blanchet, B; David, V; Debord, J; Houssel-Debry, P; Jezequel, C; Lemaitre, F; Petitcollin, A; Rayar, M; Roussel, M; Tron, C; Verdier, MC; Woillard, JB, 2020
)
0.77
"We hypothesized that area under the concentration time curve (AUC(0-12)) is more accurate pharmacokinetic predictor vs trough level of mycophenolic acid (C0)."( Pharmacokinetic evaluation of MFF in combinations with tacrolimus and cyclosporine. Findings of C0 and AUC.
Kaduševičius, E; Marquet, P; Maslauskienë, R; Radzevičienė, A; Saint-Marcoux, F; Stankevičius, E, 2020
)
0.81
" The aims were to develop a population pharmacokinetic model (Pk pop) taking into account post-transplant phases (PTP), CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms on Tac pharmacokinetics in adult kidney transplant patients."( Effect of CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A4*1B but not CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetic model in Tunisian kidney transplant.
Aouam, K; Ben Fadhel, N; Ben Fredj, N; Ben Romdhane, H; Boughattas, NA; Chaabane, A; Chadli, Z; Hannachi, I; Touitou, Y, 2020
)
0.79
"Usage of tacrolimus is complicated by its narrow therapeutic index and wide between- and within-subject pharmacokinetic variability."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in Chinese cardiac transplant recipients.
Gong, Y; Li, J; Li, X; Lu, Y; Sun, Y; Yang, M, 2020
)
1.24
" We developed 2 new population pharmacokinetic models based on a compartmental approach, with one following the physiologically based pharmacokinetic approach and both including circadian modulation of absorption and clearance variables."( Predictive engines based on pharmacokinetics modelling for tacrolimus personalized dosage in paediatric renal transplant patients.
Borobia, A; Carcas-Sansuan, A; Prado-Velasco, M, 2020
)
0.8
" The first assessed the effect of morning versus evening dosing on the pharmacokinetic profile of LCPT 2 mg; the second assessed the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic profile of LCPT 5 mg."( Chronopharmacokinetics and Food Effects of Single-Dose LCP-Tacrolimus in Healthy Volunteers.
Alloway, RR; Brennan, DC; Cohen, EA; Kerr, J; Meier-Kriesche, U; Momper, JD; Moten, MA; Stevens, DR; Trofe-Clark, J, 2020
)
0.8
"50), or terminal half-life (arithmetic mean = 26."( Chronopharmacokinetics and Food Effects of Single-Dose LCP-Tacrolimus in Healthy Volunteers.
Alloway, RR; Brennan, DC; Cohen, EA; Kerr, J; Meier-Kriesche, U; Momper, JD; Moten, MA; Stevens, DR; Trofe-Clark, J, 2020
)
0.8
" However, TAC high intra- and inter-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability makes it more laborious to accurately predict the appropriate dosage required for a given patient."( Predictors of tacrolimus pharmacokinetic variability: current evidences and future perspectives.
Bindels, LB; Chaib Eddour, D; Degraeve, AL; Elens, L; Haufroid, V; Moudio, S; Mourad, M, 2020
)
0.92
"Numerous population pharmacokinetic (PK) models of tacrolimus in adult transplant recipients have been published to characterize tacrolimus PK and facilitate dose individualization."( Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Tacrolimus in Adult Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review.
Carland, JE; Day, RO; Hennig, S; Kirubakaran, R; Stocker, SL, 2020
)
1.08
" Here, we report a patient who showed high sunitinib concentrations, in addition to pharmacokinetic changes in tacrolimus and everolimus after sunitinib therapy."( Model-based assessment of pharmacokinetic changes of sunitinib, tacrolimus, and everolimus in a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma after renal transplantation.
Fujisawa, M; Furukawa, J; Harada, K; Ito, T; Ogawa, S; Omura, T; Yamamoto, K; Yano, I, 2020
)
1.01
" However, the effect of ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism on pharmacokinetic variables of tacrolimus is controversial in different studies."( Effect of ABCB1 3435C>T Genetic Polymorphism on Pharmacokinetic Variables of Tacrolimus in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lin, Y; Meng, K; Peng, W; Zhang, H, 2020
)
1.01
" The study explored the relationship between ABCB1 3435C>T genetic polymorphism and pharmacokinetic variables of tacrolimus stratified according to time of posttransplantation, ethnicity, methods of concentration measurement, and the initial doses of tacrolimus."( Effect of ABCB1 3435C>T Genetic Polymorphism on Pharmacokinetic Variables of Tacrolimus in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lin, Y; Meng, K; Peng, W; Zhang, H, 2020
)
1
"Our meta-analysis identified that the ABCB1 3435C>T genetic polymorphism affected the pharmacokinetic variables of tacrolimus in adult renal transplant recipients."( Effect of ABCB1 3435C>T Genetic Polymorphism on Pharmacokinetic Variables of Tacrolimus in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lin, Y; Meng, K; Peng, W; Zhang, H, 2020
)
1
"Following single topical administration, TAC was absorbed slowly with a Tmax of 4 h and an absolute bioavailability of 11%."( Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of Tacrolimus after Topical Administration: Implications for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.
Dong, L; Erbas, VE; Fanzio, PM; Feturi, FG; Gorantla, VS; Oksuz, S; Plock, JA; Sahin, H; Schnider, JT; Solari, MG; Spiess, AM; Unadkat, JM; Venkataramanan, R, 2020
)
0.83
" In this study, to contribute to TDM of TAC in CBT, we performed the population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis of TAC in 56 CBT patients and investigated the factors that affected the concentration of TAC, focusing the variation of RBC count."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in umbilical cord blood transplant patients focusing on the variation in red blood cell counts.
Ando, M; Fujimoto, A; Fukushima, K; Hashida, T; Hirano, T; Ikesue, H; Irie, K; Ishikawa, T; Miyasaka, M; Muroi, N; Shimomura, Y; Sugioka, N; Yoshida, S, 2021
)
0.91
" Previous population pharmacokinetic (PK) models have been developed in solid organ transplant, yet none exists for patients receiving HCT."( Evaluation of the performance of a prior tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic kidney transplant model among adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.
Armistead, PM; Campagne, O; Crona, DJ; Flynn, G; Mager, DE; Miller, JA; Patel, T; Ptachcinski, JR; Suzuki, O; Torrice, CD; Weiner, DL; Wiltshire, T; Zhu, J, 2021
)
0.89
"Various population pharmacokinetic models have been developed to describe the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation."( Can We Predict Individual Concentrations of Tacrolimus After Liver Transplantation? Application and Tweaking of a Published Population Pharmacokinetic Model in Clinical Practice.
Chan Kwong, AHP; Decrocq-Rudler, MA; Fraisse, J; Khier, S; Meunier, L; Ursic-Bedoya, J, 2021
)
1.1
"A literature review was conducted to select an adequate population pharmacokinetic model (L)."( Can We Predict Individual Concentrations of Tacrolimus After Liver Transplantation? Application and Tweaking of a Published Population Pharmacokinetic Model in Clinical Practice.
Chan Kwong, AHP; Decrocq-Rudler, MA; Fraisse, J; Khier, S; Meunier, L; Ursic-Bedoya, J, 2021
)
0.88
"A pharmacokinetic model can be used, and to improve the predictive performance, tweaking the literature model with the $PRIOR approach allows to obtain better predictions."( Can We Predict Individual Concentrations of Tacrolimus After Liver Transplantation? Application and Tweaking of a Published Population Pharmacokinetic Model in Clinical Practice.
Chan Kwong, AHP; Decrocq-Rudler, MA; Fraisse, J; Khier, S; Meunier, L; Ursic-Bedoya, J, 2021
)
0.88
" However, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information for EVL combined with TAC is limited."( Pharmacodynamic Drug-Drug Interaction on Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Between Everolimus and Tacrolimus at the Therapeutic Concentration Range in Renal Transplantation.
Akashi, I; Akiyama, S; Hirano, T; Iwamoto, H; Kihara, Y; Konno, O; Oda, T; Okihara, M; Osato, S; Takeuchi, H; Tanaka, S; Unezaki, S; Yoshinaga, R, 2021
)
0.84
" The aims of this study were to assess the effect of TAC+WZC co-administration and genetic polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of TAC, by using a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing guidelines for tacrolimus co-administration with Wuzhi capsule in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Fu, Q; Hou, X; Jiao, Z; Jing, Y; Kong, Y; Liu, H; Peng, H; Wei, X, 2021
)
0.86
" The objectives of this study were: (i) to develop a Xgboost model to estimate tacrolimus inter-dose AUC based on concentration-time profiles obtained from a literature population pharmacokinetic (POPPK) model using Monte Carlo simulation; and (ii) to compare its performance with that of MAP-BE in external datasets of rich concentration-time profiles."( Estimation of drug exposure by machine learning based on simulations from published pharmacokinetic models: The example of tacrolimus.
Labriffe, M; Marquet, P; Prémaud, A; Woillard, JB, 2021
)
1.06
" The primary objective of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of Envarsus among liver transplant patients and select a limited sampling strategy (LSS) for AUC estimation."( Population pharmacokinetics and genetics of oral meltdose tacrolimus (Envarsus) in stable adult liver transplant recipients.
Biewenga, M; Keizer, R; Martial, LC; Moes, DJAR; Ruijter, BN; Swen, JJ; van Hoek, B, 2021
)
0.87
" Blood concentrations of TAC were used for pharmacokinetic analysis."( Discontinuation of oral amphotericin B therapy does not influence the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in heart transplant patients.
Fukushima, N; Hattori, Y; Hayakawa, N; Ikura, M; Matsuda, S; Nakagita, K; Nakamura, T; Oda, R; Seguchi, O; Takenaka, H; Uno, T; Wada, K; Yanase, M, 2021
)
0.84
" A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach."( Effects of Postoperative Day and NR1I2 on Tacrolimus Clearance in Chinese Liver Transplant Recipients-A Population Model Approach.
Cui, J; Li, X; Lu, Y; Shen, S; Xu, L, 2021
)
0.89
" The pharmacokinetic (PK) of MPA has been extensively studied, which revealed a high degree of variability."( Genetic polymorphisms in metabolic enzymes and transporters have no impact on mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in adult kidney transplant patients co-treated with tacrolimus: A population analysis.
Feng, LJ; Jiao, Z; Liao, GY; Sheng, CC; Su, Y; Xia, Q; Xu, DJ; Yang, CL, 2021
)
0.82
"05), Cmax (16."( Pharmacokinetics of a once-daily tacrolimus formulation in first nations and caucasian liver transplant recipients.
Dascal, R; Franklin, C; Kim, R; Knowles, C; Miller, D; Minuk, GY; On, NH; Peretz, D, 2021
)
0.9
" The objective of this review is to highlight and compare available pharmacokinetic (PK) data of extended-release tacrolimus tablets (LCP-TAC) to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC) in kidney transplant recipients."( Comparing the pharmacokinetics of extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-TAC) to immediate-release formulations in kidney transplant patients.
Bunnapradist, S; Tan, T, 2021
)
1.08
"Although the pharmacokinetic variability of Tacrolimus (Tac) metabolism is primarily influenced by CYP3A5 genotypes, the potential effect according to CYP3A5 polymorphisms in Tac extended-release (Tac-ER) and immediate-release (Tac-IR) and between these formulations' conversion needs further investigation."( Effects of CPY3A5 Genetic Polymorphisms on the Pharmacokinetics of Extendedrelease and Immediate-release Tacrolimus Formulations in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Cui, Y; Liu, Z; Ma, L; Mu, G; Xiang, Q; Xie, Q; Zhang, Z; Zhou, S, 2021
)
1.1
" The summary weighted mean difference with 95% confidence intervals was calculated for pharmacokinetic parameters using the random-effects model according to posttransplantation periods, genotypes and formulations."( Effects of CPY3A5 Genetic Polymorphisms on the Pharmacokinetics of Extendedrelease and Immediate-release Tacrolimus Formulations in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Cui, Y; Liu, Z; Ma, L; Mu, G; Xiang, Q; Xie, Q; Zhang, Z; Zhou, S, 2021
)
0.84
" Furthermore, when 1:1 dose conversion from Tac-IR to Tac-ER (all at ≥12 months post-transplantation), Ctrough and Cmax were decreased in both CYP3A5 non-expressors and expressors, while daily dose was only decreased in CYP3A5 nonexpressors and AUC0-24h was only decreased in CYP3A5 expressors."( Effects of CPY3A5 Genetic Polymorphisms on the Pharmacokinetics of Extendedrelease and Immediate-release Tacrolimus Formulations in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Cui, Y; Liu, Z; Ma, L; Mu, G; Xiang, Q; Xie, Q; Zhang, Z; Zhou, S, 2021
)
0.84
"Identification of the most appropriate population pharmacokinetic model-based Bayesian estimation is required prior to its implementation in routine clinical practice to inform tacrolimus dosing decisions."( Evaluation of published population pharmacokinetic models to inform tacrolimus dosing in adult heart transplant recipients.
Carland, JE; Day, RO; Hennig, S; Kirubakaran, R; Maslen, B; Stocker, SL, 2022
)
1.15
"Population pharmacokinetic models of tacrolimus were selected (n = 17) for evaluation from a recent systematic review."( Evaluation of published population pharmacokinetic models to inform tacrolimus dosing in adult heart transplant recipients.
Carland, JE; Day, RO; Hennig, S; Kirubakaran, R; Maslen, B; Stocker, SL, 2022
)
1.23
"This single-center, open-label, randomized cross-over pharmacokinetic (PK) study compares extended-release LCP-Tac with the prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus (PR-Tac) in adult de novo liver transplant recipients."( A single-center, open-label, randomized cross-over study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of once-daily prolonged-release formulations of tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients.
Achilles, EG; Buchholz, BM; Fischer, L; Herden, U; Ott, A; Sterneck, M, 2021
)
1.02
"Tacrolimus is a narrow therapeutic index drug with high pharmacokinetic variability, and several tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models were developed to guide individualized drug dosing."( Predictive Performance of Published Tacrolimus Population Pharmacokinetic Models in Thai Kidney Transplant Patients.
Leelakanok, N; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J; Onlamai, K, 2022
)
2.44
" By using the Bayesian posthoc estimate of individual pharmacokinetic parameters, all models well performed with the MAPE and RMSE of < 30% and 40%, respectively, except two models; one could not successfully converge and the other substantially underpredicted tacrolimus concentrations."( Predictive Performance of Published Tacrolimus Population Pharmacokinetic Models in Thai Kidney Transplant Patients.
Leelakanok, N; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J; Onlamai, K, 2022
)
1.18
"Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is useful for evaluating differences in drug exposure among special populations, but it has not yet been employed to evaluate the absorption process of tacrolimus."( Extrapolation of physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for tacrolimus from renal to liver transplant patients.
Imai, S; Itohara, K; Kobayashi, T; Matsubara, K; Nakagawa, S; Nakagawa, T; Ogawa, O; Omura, T; Sakai, K; Sawada, A; Taura, K; Tochio, A; Yano, I; Yonezawa, A, 2022
)
1.15
"Use of electronic health record (EHR) data to estimate population pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles necessitates several assumptions."( Sensitivity of estimated tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic profile to assumed dose timing and absorption in real-world data and simulated data.
Beck, C; Birdwell, KA; Choi, L; Van Driest, SL; Weeks, HL; Williams, ML, 2022
)
1.02
"Tacrolimus (TAC) is an immunosuppressant with large interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and a narrow therapeutic index."( Rapid clearance of tacrolimus blood concentration triggered by variant pharmacogenes.
Borić-Bilušić, A; Božina, N; Canjuga, I; Ganoci, L; Šimičević, L; Zibar, L, 2022
)
2.49
"Data describing the magnitude of the pharmacokinetic interaction between letermovir and tacrolimus in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) recipients are limited, and varying outcomes have been reported."( Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Letermovir and Tacrolimus in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients.
Cumpston, A; Dillaman, M; Marciano, KA; Ross, KG; Seago, K; Veltri, L, 2022
)
1.18
" A single dose of apixaban 10 mg was administered orally to kidney and lung transplant recipients maintained on either tacrolimus or cyclosporine, and pharmacokinetic parameters were compared to a reference cohort of 12 healthy subjects who used the same apixaban dose and pharmacokinetic blood sampling."( Pharmacokinetics of apixaban and tacrolimus or cyclosporine in kidney and lung transplant recipients.
Alcorn, J; Bashir, B; Douketis, JD; Fenton, ME; Kraft, WK; Mansell, H; Semchuk, W; Shoker, A; Tam, JS; Yao, S, 2022
)
1.21
" Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe the relationship between intracellular and whole-blood tacrolimus concentrations in a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model."( A Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Whole-Blood and Intracellular Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Andrews, LM; Baan, CC; de Winter, BCM; de Wit, LEA; Francke, MI; Franken, LG; Hesselink, DA; Li, Y; van Schaik, RHN, 2022
)
1.17
"This study aimed to establish a population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus coadministration with Wuzhi capsule and optimise the dosage regimen in adult liver transplant patients."( Population pharmacokinetics and dosage optimisation of tacrolimus coadministration with Wuzhi capsule in adult liver transplant patients.
Du, Y; Ge, W; Song, W; Xiong, X; Zhu, H, 2022
)
1.2
" The TAC level in PBMCs was determined, and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental study."( The pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and limited sampling strategy for estimation of exposure in renal transplant recipients.
An, HM; Chen, B; Shao, K; Wang, XH; Zhai, XH; Zhou, PJ, 2022
)
1.03
"TAC was orally and intravenously administered to rats alone or in combination with CRT and the pharmacokinetic parameters of TAC were compared."( Inhibitory effects of traditional Chinese medicine colquhounia root tablet on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in rats.
Ding, Y; Feng, X; Shi, Y; Zheng, H, 2022
)
0.94
"58 h·ng/mL) in a single dose run and the pharmacokinetic parameters gradually returned to the normal levels at 24 h interval of long-term CRT pretreatment."( Inhibitory effects of traditional Chinese medicine colquhounia root tablet on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in rats.
Ding, Y; Feng, X; Shi, Y; Zheng, H, 2022
)
0.94
"A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model may be used to improve tacrolimus dosing and minimize under- and overexposure in kidney transplant recipients."( Body composition is associated with tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients.
de Mik-van Egmond, AME; De Winter, BCM; Francke, MI; Hesselink, DA; Severs, D; Visser, WJ, 2022
)
1.23
" Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM)."( Body composition is associated with tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients.
de Mik-van Egmond, AME; De Winter, BCM; Francke, MI; Hesselink, DA; Severs, D; Visser, WJ, 2022
)
1
"The generalizability of numerous tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models constructed to promote optimal tacrolimus dosing in patients with primary nephrotic syndrome (PNS) is unclear."( Population Pharmacokinetic Evaluation with External Validation of Tacrolimus in Chinese Primary Nephrotic Syndrome Patients.
Huang, Z; Pei, Q; Yang, L; Yang, N; Yi, B, 2022
)
1.24
" Apparent clearance (CL/F) and distribution volume (V/F) for each individual were derived from concentration-time profiles combined with population pharmacokinetic priors, with subsequent assessment for between-group difference in pharmacokinetics."( Important lack of difference in tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics between Aboriginal and Caucasian kidney transplant recipients.
Barraclough, KA; Carroll, R; Cherian, S; Gorham, G; Holford, N; Majoni, SW; Metz, D; Staatz, CE; Swaminathan, R, 2022
)
1
" This study aimed to develop a pharmacokinetic model for tacrolimus that can be used for TDM procedures in Korean adult transplant recipients by integrating published models with acquired real-world TDM data and evaluating clinically meaningful covariates."( Pharmacokinetic Model Based on Stochastic Simulation and Estimation for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus in Korean Adult Transplant Recipients.
Choi, S; Ghim, JR; Han, S; Hong, Y; Jung, SH; Kang, G, 2022
)
1.18
" In this study, a population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted to improve the individualization of everolimus therapy."( Population pharmacokinetics of everolimus in adult liver transplant patients: Comparison to tacrolimus disposition and extrapolation to pediatrics.
Hata, K; Hatano, E; Hira, D; Hirai, M; Imai, S; Ito, T; Itohara, K; Matsubara, K; Nakagawa, S; Nakagawa, T; Sugimoto, M; Terada, T; Yano, I; Yonezawa, A, 2022
)
0.94
" The current study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction magnitude of Wuzhi and TAC and explore the potential determinants of this interaction."( Prediction of tacrolimus and Wuzhi tablet pharmacokinetic interaction magnitude in renal transplant recipients.
Chen, P; Chen, X; Dai, R; Fu, Q; Huang, M; She, Y; Wang, C, 2022
)
1.08
"Our study is the first attempt to date to give an assessment of the magnitude of pharmacokinetic interaction between TAC and Wuzhi in a cohort of renal transplant recipients, and CYP3A5 genotypes, baseline C0/D and Hct were identified as determinants of this interaction."( Prediction of tacrolimus and Wuzhi tablet pharmacokinetic interaction magnitude in renal transplant recipients.
Chen, P; Chen, X; Dai, R; Fu, Q; Huang, M; She, Y; Wang, C, 2022
)
1.08
" We previously developed the blood-based Immunobiogram bioassay for in-vitro characterization of the pharmacodynamic response of patients' own immune cells to a range of immunosuppressants."( The Immunobiogram, a novel in vitro diagnostic test to measure the pharmacodynamic response to immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant patients.
Andrés, A; Crespo, M; Díez, T; Jiménez, C; Kotton, CN; Krajewska, M; Ortega, A; Pascual, J; Paz-Artal, E; Portero, I; Portolés, J; Seron, D; Sorensen, SS; Witzke, O, 2022
)
0.72
"Our results highlight the potential of Immunobiogram as a tool to test the pharmacodynamic response to individual immunosuppressive drugs."( The Immunobiogram, a novel in vitro diagnostic test to measure the pharmacodynamic response to immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant patients.
Andrés, A; Crespo, M; Díez, T; Jiménez, C; Kotton, CN; Krajewska, M; Ortega, A; Pascual, J; Paz-Artal, E; Portero, I; Portolés, J; Seron, D; Sorensen, SS; Witzke, O, 2022
)
0.72
"This study aimed to develop and evaluate a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) combined machine learning approach to predict tacrolimus trough concentrations for Chinese adult liver transplant recipients in the early posttransplant period."( Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling Combined With Machine Learning Approach Improved Tacrolimus Trough Concentration Prediction in Chinese Adult Liver Transplant Recipients.
Li, RD; Li, ZR; Niu, WJ; Qiu, XY; Wang, ZX; Zheng, XY; Zhong, MK, 2023
)
1.34
"The study aimed to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model of tacrolimus for Chinese patients with nephrotic syndrome using the patient's genotype and Wuzhi capsule dosage as the main test factors."( Tacrolimus Population Pharmacokinetic Model in Adult Chinese Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome and Dosing Regimen Identification Using Monte Carlo Simulations.
Liao, M; Wang, M; Zhao, L; Zhao, M; Zhu, X, 2022
)
2.4
" Residual NFAT-RGE at the time of maximum concentration (RGE tmax ) of 15% when using ciclosporin and of 30% when using tacrolimus was associated with similar average NFAT-RGEs during a dose interval."( Pharmacodynamic Monitoring of Ciclosporin and Tacrolimus: Insights From Nuclear Factor of Activated T-Cell-Regulated Gene Expression in Healthy Volunteers.
Czock, D; Djaelani, YA; Giese, T; Sommerer, C, 2023
)
1.38
"Ciclosporin and tacrolimus led to similar average suppression of NFAT-RGE in a dose interval, despite considerably different RGE tmax ."( Pharmacodynamic Monitoring of Ciclosporin and Tacrolimus: Insights From Nuclear Factor of Activated T-Cell-Regulated Gene Expression in Healthy Volunteers.
Czock, D; Djaelani, YA; Giese, T; Sommerer, C, 2023
)
1.51
" A total of 275 concentrations from 13 pediatric patients were used to build a polulation pharmacokinetic model using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Pediatric Patients With Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant.
Chen, J; Guo, Y; Shang, Y; Sun, Y; Xu, G; Zhu, L; Zuo, M, 2023
)
1.2
" Therefore, we aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of sublingually administered tacrolimus in patients who cannot swallow the capsules due to their age, sedation status and/or mechanical ventilation during the first weeks post-transplantation."( Population pharmacokinetics of sublingually administered tacrolimus in infants and young children with liver transplantation.
Buamscha, D; Cáceres Guido, P; Cruz, A; Dip, M; Galván, ME; Halac, E; Ibarra, M; Imventarza, O; Licciardone, N; Lopez, C; Parra-Guillen, ZP; Pérez, E; Riva, N; Schaiquevich, P; Trezeguet Renatti, G; Troconiz, IF, 2023
)
1.37
"Demographic, clinical and pharmacological variables, including tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from therapeutic drug monitoring and data from dense-sampling pharmacokinetic profiles, were recorded in 26 paediatric patients with biliary atresia who underwent liver transplantation between 2016 and 2021."( Population pharmacokinetics of sublingually administered tacrolimus in infants and young children with liver transplantation.
Buamscha, D; Cáceres Guido, P; Cruz, A; Dip, M; Galván, ME; Halac, E; Ibarra, M; Imventarza, O; Licciardone, N; Lopez, C; Parra-Guillen, ZP; Pérez, E; Riva, N; Schaiquevich, P; Trezeguet Renatti, G; Troconiz, IF, 2023
)
1.4
"A population pharmacokinetic model of sublingually administered tacrolimus in paediatric patients was developed to characterize different absorption mechanisms."( Population pharmacokinetics of sublingually administered tacrolimus in infants and young children with liver transplantation.
Buamscha, D; Cáceres Guido, P; Cruz, A; Dip, M; Galván, ME; Halac, E; Ibarra, M; Imventarza, O; Licciardone, N; Lopez, C; Parra-Guillen, ZP; Pérez, E; Riva, N; Schaiquevich, P; Trezeguet Renatti, G; Troconiz, IF, 2023
)
1.39
" The present study aimed to investigate genetic variants and clinical factors affecting the variability of tacrolimus in Chinese Han heart transplant patients using a population pharmacokinetic approach."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis for Model-Based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus in Chinese Han Heart Transplant Patients.
Chen, J; Cheng, Y; Lin, X; Qiu, H; Zhang, J, 2023
)
1.35
"The population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in heart transplant patients can better estimate the population and individual pharmacokinetic parameters of patients and can provide a reference for the design of individualized dosing regimens."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis for Model-Based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus in Chinese Han Heart Transplant Patients.
Chen, J; Cheng, Y; Lin, X; Qiu, H; Zhang, J, 2023
)
1.4
" Multiple pediatric tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models incorporating CYP3A5 genotype and other covariates have been developed."( Predictive Capacity of Population Pharmacokinetic Models for the Tacrolimus Dose Requirements of Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.
Pai, MP; Park, JM; Pasternak, AL, 2023
)
1.47
" This study aimed to develop a semiphysiologically based population pharmacokinetic (semi-PBPK) model and a web-based dashboard to identify the dynamic inhibition of tacrolimus metabolism caused by voriconazole and provide individual tacrolimus regimens for Chinese adult liver transplant recipients."( Individual dose recommendations for drug interaction between tacrolimus and voriconazole in adult liver transplant recipients: A semiphysiologically based population pharmacokinetic modeling approach.
Li, J; Li, RD; Li, ZR; Niu, WJ; Qiu, XY; Shen, CH; Wang, B; Wang, ZX; Zhang, LJ; Zhong, MK, 2023
)
1.35
" Because of its large between-subject variability, several population pharmacokinetic (PPK) studies have been performed to facilitate individualized therapy."( Population pharmacokinetic analyses of tacrolimus in non-transplant patients: a systematic review.
Wang, CB; Zhang, YJ; Zhao, LM; Zhao, MM, 2023
)
1.18
"The PubMed, Embase databases, and Cochrane Library, as well as related references, were searched from the time of inception of the databases to February 2023, to identify TAC population pharmacokinetic studies modeled in non-transplant patients using a non-linear mixed-effects modeling approach."( Population pharmacokinetic analyses of tacrolimus in non-transplant patients: a systematic review.
Wang, CB; Zhang, YJ; Zhao, LM; Zhao, MM, 2023
)
1.18
" A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling."( A Joint Pharmacokinetic Model for the Simultaneous Description of Plasma and Whole Blood Tacrolimus Concentrations in Kidney and Lung Transplant Recipients.
Bakker, SJL; Colin, PJ; Gan, CT; Knobbe, TJ; Koomen, JV; Kremer, D; Touw, DJ; Verschuuren, EAM; Zijp, TR, 2023
)
1.13
" We sought to externally validate a previously published population pharmacokinetic (PK) model that was constructed with data from a single site."( External assessment and refinement of a population pharmacokinetic model to guide tacrolimus dosing in pediatric heart transplant.
Cabrera, AG; Daly, KP; Hong, B; Hope, KD; McKnite, A; Molina, KM; Rower, JE, 2023
)
1.14
" Although the pharmacokinetic effects of BEL on other immunosuppressive (IS) agents have not been clinically evaluated, in vitro data indicate that BEL may have possible interactions with drugs with a narrow therapeutic index used to treat cGVHD, such as tacrolimus, sirolimus, and cyclosporine, through cytochrome P450 (CYP3A) and p-glycoprotein interactions."( Belumosudil Impacts Immunosuppression Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.
Faramand, R; Gaskill, E; Gonzalez, R; Khimani, F; Lazaryan, A; Padilla, M; Perez, L; Pidala, J, 2023
)
1.09
" However, the calculation of its exposure based on the area under the curve (AUC) requires the use of a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model."( Tacrolimus population pharmacokinetics in adult heart transplant patients.
Destere, A; Labriffe, M; Marquet, P; Monchaud, C; Paschier, A; Woillard, JB, 2023
)
2.35
"A prospective validation of pharmacokinetic population (Pk pop) of Tacrolimus (Tac) for dose adjustment in kidney transplant patients was assessed in only one study."( A prospective validation of a population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in Tunisian kidney transplant patients.
Aouam, K; Ben-Fadhel, N; Ben-Fredj, N; Ben-Romdhane, H; Boughattas, N; Chaabane, A; Chadly, Z; Hannachi, I, 2023
)
1.38
" Studies in kidney transplant patients suggest that genetic variants can influence these pharmacokinetic parameters."( Influence of genetic variants on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sirolimus: a systematic review.
Coenen, MJ; Harbers, V; Vermeltfoort, L; Wm Te Loo, DM, 2023
)
0.91
"Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) is the newest and most promising sample-collection technique for quantitatively analyzing drugs, especially for routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and pharmacokinetic studies."( Analytical and Clinical Validation of Assays for Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling (VAMS) of Drugs in Different Blood Matrices: A Literature Review.
Aarnoutse, RE; Hasanah, AN; Nugraha, RV; Ruslami, R; Santoso, P; Yunivita, V, 2023
)
0.91

Compound-Compound Interactions

Tacrolimus has been used mostly in combination with azathioprine as primary immunosuppression after lung transplantation. Low-dose or high-dose ASKP1240, showed a significantly longer allograft survival time compared with monotherapy groups.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The best use of FK at low doses was in combination with CyA and Pred."( Canine kidney transplantation with FK-506 alone or in combination with cyclosporine and steroids.
Casavilla, A; Cemaj, S; Demetris, AJ; Ghalab, A; Imventarza, O; Mazzaferro, V; Okuda, K; Rhoe, BS; Todo, S; Ueda, Y, 1987
)
0.27
" Pharmacokinetic studies did not show any significant difference in clearance of FK506 when administered alone or in combination with methylprednisolone or MTX."( Tacrolimus (FK506) alone or in combination with methotrexate or methylprednisolone for the prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease after marrow transplantation from HLA-matched siblings: a single-center study.
Anasetti, C; Appelbaum, FR; Doney, K; Etzioni, R; Furlong, T; Gooley, T; Martin, P; Nash, RA; Slattery, J; Storb, R, 1995
)
1.73
" This dose of FK-506 was used in combination with PEG-SOD at doses of 1000, 3000, 10,000, or 30,000 units."( Reduction of FK-506 requirements by combination with polyethylene glycol superoxide dismutase in orthotopic rat liver transplantation.
Cai, X; Demetris, A; Faltynek, C; Kumar, P; Platt, JL; Rao, PN; Starzl, T; Thunberg, A; Venkataramanan, R, 1995
)
0.29
"The effects of 15-deoxyspergualin (DSG) alone and in combination with FK 506 (FK) on liver regeneration after 2/3 hepatectomy was studied."( Enhanced liver regeneration in rats treated with 15-deoxyspergualin alone and in combination with FK 506.
Aono, T; Koyama, S; Muto, T; Ohtake, M; Okamura, N; Sakaguchi, T; Tsukada, K; Yoshida, K, 1993
)
0.29
"The synergistic effects of inoculation with donor lymphocytes via portal vein (PV) in combination with FK506 or monoclonal anti-T lymphocyte antibody (OX19) on cardiac allograft survival were investigated in rat heart transplant model (Lewis engrafted BN heart)."( [The effect of perioperative portal venous inoculation with donor lymphocytes in combination with immunosuppressive agents on rat cardiac allograft survivals].
Hamashima, T; Hirakawa, K; Ohsaka, Y; Oka, T; Shiho, O; Yasui, H; Yoshimura, N, 1993
)
0.29
"The safety and potential efficacy of FK506 in combination with a short course of methotrexate (MTX) for the prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after marrow transplantation from HLA-matched unrelated donors was evaluated in a single-arm Phase II study conducted at two centers."( FK506 in combination with methotrexate for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease after marrow transplantation from matched unrelated donors.
Anasetti, C; Deeg, HJ; Fay, JW; Fitzsimmons, WE; Furlong, T; Gooley, T; Hansen, JA; Maher, RM; Martin, P; McSweeney, PA; Nash, RA; Piñeiro, LA; Storb, R; Sullivan, KM, 1996
)
0.29
" Splenectomy by itself was marginally effective; however, this effect was enhanced when combined with low dose FK506 therapy."( Prolongation of rat liver graft survival by splenectomy combined with low dose FK506 therapy.
Abe, Y; Kashu, Y; Kimura, S; Miyauchi, K; Sato, M; Sato, N; Watanabe, Y, 1996
)
0.29
" We investigated whether RS61443 in combination with leflunomide (Lef) or FK506 (FK) could prolong allograft survival in a rat heart model, since combination therapy might help to overcome drug toxicity."( Effect of RS61443 in combination with leflunomide or FK506 on rat heart allograft survival.
Antoniou, E; D'Silva, M; DeRoover, A; Howie, AJ; McMaster, P; Nishimura, Y, 1996
)
0.29
" In addition, we conclude that TAC and CsA (Neoral), when combined with MMF, yield similar, low acute rejection rates with similar graft function and metabolic control."( Mycophenolate mofetil decreases rejection in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation when combined with tacrolimus or cyclosporine.
Chan, L; Kam, I; Nolan, C; Simon, M; Stegall, MD; Wachs, ME, 1997
)
0.51
" Using a DA donor-to-LEW recipient rat combination, we assessed the efficacy of peritransplant FTY720 alone or in combination with post-transplant tacrolimus on the survival of cardiac allografts."( Effect of peritransplant FTY720 alone or in combination with post-transplant tacrolimus in a rat model of cardiac allotransplantation.
Afford, SC; Antoniou, EA; D'Silva, M; McMaster, P; Pirenne, J; Xu, M, 1998
)
0.73
"Long-term survival of hamster liver and heart xenografts in Lewis rats could be induced by a regimen of short-term FK506 in combination with Lef followed by FK506 monotherapy."( FK506 treatment in combination with leflunomide in hamster-to-rat heart and liver xenograft transplantation.
Blinder, L; Chong, AS; Foster, P; Ma, LL; Sankary, HN; Shen, JK; Williams, JW; Yin, DP, 1998
)
0.3
" Its antiproliferative effect on human mononuclear cells in combination with different immunosuppressive drugs was further analysed in vitro."( Synergistic effects of the alkaloid sinomenine in combination with the immunosuppressive drugs tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid.
Kaever, V; Resch, K; Vieregge, B, 1999
)
0.52
"The possible pharmacokinetic interaction between the new immunosuppressive mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus (TAC), respectively, was assessed by comparing routinely estimated mycophenolic acid (MPA) plasma trough levels of 15 consecutive renal transplant patients receiving MMF in combination with methylprednisolone (MEP) and cyclosporin A (CSA, 10 patients) or in combination with MEP and tacrolimus (TAC, 5 patients)."( Drug interaction between mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus detectable within therapeutic mycophenolic acid monitoring in renal transplant patients.
Eismann, R; Hübner, GI; Sziegoleit, W, 1999
)
0.77
" We investigated therapy with FTY combined with tacrolimus (FK) in rat liver transplantation."( Immunosuppressive therapy using FTY720 combined with tacrolimus in rat liver transplantation.
Amemiya, H; Enosawa, S; Funeshima, N; Kitajima, M; Li, XK; Suzuki, S; Tamura, A, 2000
)
0.81
"After cadaveric renal transplant, patients were randomized to receive tacrolimus in combination with either azathioprine (AZA, n=59), MMF 1 g/day (n=59), or MMF 2 g/day group (n=58)."( Safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in cadaveric renal transplant recipients. FK506/MMF Dose-Ranging Kidney Transplant Study Group.
Jensik, SC; Mendez, R; Miller, J; Pirsch, JD, 2000
)
0.85
"Tacrolimus in combination with an initial dose of MMF 2 g/day is a very effective and safe regimen in cadaveric kidney transplant recipients."( Safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in cadaveric renal transplant recipients. FK506/MMF Dose-Ranging Kidney Transplant Study Group.
Jensik, SC; Mendez, R; Miller, J; Pirsch, JD, 2000
)
2.06
"Recently, specific immunonutrients were found to increase experimental allograft survival when combined with cyclosporine A (CsA)."( Nutritional immunomodulation leads to enhanced allograft survival in combination with cyclosporine A and rapamycin, but not FK506.
Alexander, JW; Babcock, GF; Custer, DA; Frede, S; Gibson, SW; Li, BG; Ogle, CK; Valente, JF, 2000
)
0.31
" Patients receiving other agents known to interact with cytochrome P450 were excluded from the study."( Clotrimazole increases tacrolimus blood levels: a drug interaction in kidney transplant patients.
Benedetti, E; Pollak, R; Vasquez, E, 2001
)
0.62
"Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an effective posttransplantation immunosuppressive agent used in combination with cyclosporin A (CsA) or tacrolimus (Tc)."( Pharmacokinetic basis for the efficient and safe use of low-dose mycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus in kidney transplantation.
Chaib Eddour, D; De Meyer, M; König, J; Malaise, J; Mourad, M; Schepers, R; Squifflet, JP; Wallemacq, P, 2001
)
0.73
" We report a dose-finding study for MMF when administered in combination with low-dose tacrolimus and corticosteroid prophylaxis in cadaveric renal transplant recipients."( Dose optimization of mycophenolate mofetil when administered with a low dose of tacrolimus in cadaveric renal transplant recipients.
Bäckman, L; Claesson, K; Dietl, KH; Ekberg, H; Forsythe, JL; Heemann, U; Kunzendorf, U; Land, W; Morales, JM; Mühlbacher, F; Schleibner, S; Squifflet, JP; Talbot, D; Taube, D; Tyden, G; van Hooff, J; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2001
)
0.76
"Low-dose tacrolimus combined with a MMF dose of 1 g daily and corticosteroids provided an optimized efficacy and safety profile."( Dose optimization of mycophenolate mofetil when administered with a low dose of tacrolimus in cadaveric renal transplant recipients.
Bäckman, L; Claesson, K; Dietl, KH; Ekberg, H; Forsythe, JL; Heemann, U; Kunzendorf, U; Land, W; Morales, JM; Mühlbacher, F; Schleibner, S; Squifflet, JP; Talbot, D; Taube, D; Tyden, G; van Hooff, J; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2001
)
0.95
"To observe the effect of FK506 eye-drop combined with keratoplasty on recurrent Mooren's ulcer."( [Effect of FK506 eye-drop combined with keratoplasty on recurrent Mooren's ulcer].
Chen, J; Lin, Y; Liu, Y; Xie, H; Ye, C, 2002
)
0.31
"9 cases (15 eyes) of recurrent Mooren's ulcer were treated with topical FK506 eye-drop combined with keratoplasty."( [Effect of FK506 eye-drop combined with keratoplasty on recurrent Mooren's ulcer].
Chen, J; Lin, Y; Liu, Y; Xie, H; Ye, C, 2002
)
0.31
"1% FK506 eye-drop combined with keratoplasty is an effective treatment for recurrent Mooren's ulcer."( [Effect of FK506 eye-drop combined with keratoplasty on recurrent Mooren's ulcer].
Chen, J; Lin, Y; Liu, Y; Xie, H; Ye, C, 2002
)
0.31
"The clinical management of tacrolimus, a macrolide used as immunosuppressant after transplantation, is complicated by its narrow therapeutic index in combination with inter- and intraindividually variable pharmacokinetics."( Mechanisms of clinically relevant drug interactions associated with tacrolimus.
Benet, LZ; Christians, U; Jacobsen, W; Lampen, A, 2002
)
0.85
" We hypothesized that chloroquine in combination with tacrolimus and the rapamycin derivative SDZ-RAD can synergistically suppress T cell responses and antigen-presenting cell (APC) function in vitro."( Evaluation for synergistic suppression of T cell responses to minor histocompatibility antigens by chloroquine in combination with tacrolimus and a rapamycin derivative, SDZ-RAD.
Bader, S; Forooghian, F; Gilman, A; HayGlass, KT; Hsiao, CC; Rempel, J; Schultz, KR; Su, WN, 2002
)
0.77
"Cyclosporine (INN: ciclosporin) A or tacrolimus have been used mostly in combination with azathioprine as primary immunosuppression after lung transplantation."( Cyclosporine A versus tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as primary immunosuppression after lung transplantation: one-year results of a 2-center prospective randomized trial.
Birsan, T; Deviatko, E; Klepetko, W; Reichart, B; Reichenspurner, H; Treede, H; Zuckermann, A, 2003
)
0.91
"This 2-center, prospective randomized study showed high immunosuppressive potency of both cyclosporine A and tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil."( Cyclosporine A versus tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as primary immunosuppression after lung transplantation: one-year results of a 2-center prospective randomized trial.
Birsan, T; Deviatko, E; Klepetko, W; Reichart, B; Reichenspurner, H; Treede, H; Zuckermann, A, 2003
)
0.85
"Tacrolimus is equally effective in renal transplantation when combined with sirolimus or MMF."( Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 6 months.
Gonwa, T; Jensik, S; Mendez, R; Steinberg, S; Weinstein, S; Yang, HC, 2003
)
2.09
"2 days); when combined with a short course of FK506, graft survival was further extended (32."( Ex vivo and systemic transfer of adenovirus-mediated CTLA4Ig gene combined with a short course of FK506 therapy prolongs islet graft survival.
Akamaru, Y; Ito, T; Kiyomoto, T; Komoda, H; Maeda, A; Matsuda, H; Miao, G; Tori, M; Uchikoshi, F,
)
0.13
"A 10-year experience with the immunosuppressive drug rapamycin that begins in the laboratory then extends through multicentre trials in combination with cyclosporine in kidney transplant recipients, exploration of its use as a single agent and in combination with tacrolimus, and its potential in nonrenal organs is described."( Rapamycin in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus in liver, pancreas, and kidney transplantation.
MacDonald, AS, 2003
)
0.76
"This 6-month study investigated the safety and efficacy of Tac and steroids in combination with three different doses of SRL in renal-transplant recipients."( A prospective randomized multicenter study of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus in renal-transplant recipients.
Paczek, L; Squifflet, JP; van Hooff, JP; Vanrenterghem, Y; Wlodarczyk, Z, 2003
)
0.58
"Tac in combination with low doses of SRL provides a very effective and safe regimen."( A prospective randomized multicenter study of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus in renal-transplant recipients.
Paczek, L; Squifflet, JP; van Hooff, JP; Vanrenterghem, Y; Wlodarczyk, Z, 2003
)
0.58
"A higher tacrolimus dose is required to reach target concentrations when used in combination with corticosteroids."( Tacrolimus dose requirement in renal transplant recipients is significantly higher when used in combination with corticosteroids.
Gregoor, PJ; Hesselink, DA; Ngyuen, H; Steyerberg, EW; van Gelder, T; van Riemsdijk, IC; Wabbijn, M; Weimar, W, 2003
)
2.18
" The aim of this study was to examine the long-term pharmacokinetic characteristics of MMF when combined with tacrolimus in renal allograft recipients and to identify a possible relationship between these pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical outcome parameters."( Twelve-month evaluation of the clinical pharmacokinetics of total and free mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolites in renal allograft recipients on low dose tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil.
Abramowicz, D; Armstrong, V; Daems, J; Kuypers, DR; Mourad, M; Oellerich, M; Shipkova, M; Squifflet, JP; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2003
)
0.73
"They have demonstrated that in renal transplant recipients MPA, free MPA, Acyl-MPAG and MPAG have a particular pharmacokinetic profile when combined with tacrolimus which differs from the combination with CsA."( Twelve-month evaluation of the clinical pharmacokinetics of total and free mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolites in renal allograft recipients on low dose tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil.
Abramowicz, D; Armstrong, V; Daems, J; Kuypers, DR; Mourad, M; Oellerich, M; Shipkova, M; Squifflet, JP; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2003
)
0.71
"Cyclosporin (CsA) or tacrolimus (TRL) is routinely combined with either sirolimus (SRL) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in immunosuppressive regimes in organ transplantation."( Assessment of immunosuppressive drug interactions: inhibition of lymphocyte function in peripheral human blood.
Barten, MJ; Bittner, HB; Chang, H; Dhein, S; Gummert, JF; Mohr, FW; Rahmel, A; Tarnok, A, 2003
)
0.64
"Clinical trials using daclizumab as induction therapy in combination with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes in solid organ transplantation."( The use of daclizumab as induction therapy in combination with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in recipients with previous transplants.
Burke, GW; Ciancio, G; Kupin, W; Mattiazzi, A; Miller, J; Roth, D, 2003
)
0.79
"In a double-blind manner, 149 patients were randomized to a 12-week treatment with FK778 in combination with tacrolimus (Tac) and corticosteroids (S)."( The effects of FK778 in combination with tacrolimus and steroids: a phase II multicenter study in renal transplant patients.
Chang, R; Charpentier, B; Grinyó, JM; Jurewicz, A; Klinger, M; Kreis, H; Mourad, G; Neuhaus, P; Paczek, L; Paul, LC; Rostaing, L; Short, C; Squifflet, JP; van Hooff, JP; Vanrenterghem, Y; Wlodarczyk, Z, 2004
)
0.8
"We investigated the efficacy of immunoadsorption (IA) in combination with tacrolimus (FK506) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) rescue therapy for C4d-positive acute humoral rejection (AHR) of renal transplants."( C4d-positive acute humoral renal allograft rejection: rescue therapy by immunoadsorption in combination with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil.
Chen, HP; Ji, DX; Ji, SM; Li, LS; Liu, M; Liu, ZH; Tang, Zh, 2004
)
0.77
"03 sessions combined with FK506 (0."( C4d-positive acute humoral renal allograft rejection: rescue therapy by immunoadsorption in combination with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil.
Chen, HP; Ji, DX; Ji, SM; Li, LS; Liu, M; Liu, ZH; Tang, Zh, 2004
)
0.54
"Sirolimus alone or combined with tacrolimus inhibited the growth of both cell lines after 5 d by up to 35% in SK-Hep 1 cells, and by up to 68% in Hep 3B cells at 25 ng/mL."( Sirolimus inhibits growth of human hepatoma cells alone or combined with tacrolimus, while tacrolimus promotes cell growth.
Bahra, M; Jacob, D; Jonas, S; Langrehr, JM; Neuhaus, P; Neuhaus, R; Oidtmann, M; Rueggeberg, A; Schumacher, G, 2005
)
0.84
"Sirolimus appears to inhibit the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma cells alone and in combination with tacrolimus."( Sirolimus inhibits growth of human hepatoma cells alone or combined with tacrolimus, while tacrolimus promotes cell growth.
Bahra, M; Jacob, D; Jonas, S; Langrehr, JM; Neuhaus, P; Neuhaus, R; Oidtmann, M; Rueggeberg, A; Schumacher, G, 2005
)
0.77
"When combined with Thymoglobulin induction, an antimetabolite, and corticosteroids, TAC and CsA are comparable in safety, efficacy, and cost in renal transplantation."( A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in combination with thymoglobulin in renal transplant recipients.
Bohl, DL; Brennan, DC; Hardinger, KL; Lockwood, M; Schnitzler, MA; Storch, GA, 2005
)
0.58
" We conducted a phase II trial of sirolimus combined with tacrolimus and methylprednisolone in patients with steroid-resistant cGVHD."( Sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus and corticosteroids for the treatment of resistant chronic graft-versus-host disease.
Andersson, B; Champlin, R; Couriel, DR; de Lima, MJ; Donato, M; Escalón, MP; Ghosh, S; Giralt, S; Hicks, K; Hosing, C; Hsu, Y; Ippoliti, C; Khouri, IF; Neumann, J; Saliba, R, 2005
)
0.86
"Tacrolimus is safe and effective in live and deceased donor kidney transplantation when given in combination with sirolimus or MMF."( A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 1 year.
Gonwa, T; Jensik, S; Mendez, R; Steinberg, S; Weinstein, S; Yang, HC, 2005
)
2.05
" The purpose of the present study was to determine the best single time points to assess the area-under-the-curve (AUC(0-12 hours)) in long-term heart transplant patients being treated with MMF in combination with CsA or tacrolimus."( Best single time points to predict the area-under-the-curve in long-term heart transplant patients taking mycophenolate mofetil in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus.
Besner, JG; Cantarovich, M; Cecere, R; Giannetti, N; Mardigyan, V, 2005
)
0.71
"Our results suggest that in long-term heart transplant patients, the calcineurin inhibitor used in combination with MMF affects the correlation between MPA single time points and the AUC(0-12 hours)."( Best single time points to predict the area-under-the-curve in long-term heart transplant patients taking mycophenolate mofetil in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus.
Besner, JG; Cantarovich, M; Cecere, R; Giannetti, N; Mardigyan, V, 2005
)
0.52
"Data on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone are scarce in Chinese renal transplantation recipients."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus after the first oral administration in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Chen, LZ; Chen, YH; Dai, YP; Fei, JG; Li, J; Qiu, J; Zheng, KL, 2005
)
1.05
"Tacrolimus AUC12 show remarkable interindividual variations after the first oral dose in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone in Chinese renal transplant recipients."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus after the first oral administration in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Chen, LZ; Chen, YH; Dai, YP; Fei, JG; Li, J; Qiu, J; Zheng, KL, 2005
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus (TAC) combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been suggested to play a critical role in the reversal of C4d-positive acute humoral rejection (AHR) in renal transplantation, but the efficacy of using only TAC-MMF without immunoadsorption or plasmapheresis has not been investigated."( Tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil can effectively reverse C4d-positive steroid-resistant acute rejection in Chinese renal allograft recipients.
Chen, H; Chen, J; Ji, S; Li, LS; Liu, ZH; Sun, Q; Yin, G, 2006
)
3.22
"Tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an effective regimen in kidney transplantation."( Tacrolimus combined with two different dosages of sirolimus in kidney transplantation: results of a multicenter study.
Abramowicz, D; Backman, L; Czajkowski, Z; Donati, D; Jaques, B; Kessler, M; Kyllönen, L; Margreiter, R; Perner, F; Rigotti, P; Rodger, RS; Rostaing, L; Sanchez-Plumed, J; Vanrenterghem, Y; Vitko, S; Wlodarczyk, Z, 2006
)
3.22
"We evaluated the in vitro capacity of FK778, alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive drugs: Tacrolimus (TRL); Sirolimus (SRL), Everolimus (EVL), to inhibit clonal expansion of T-lymphocytes and expression of lymphocyte-activation surface antigens; secondly, we compared the immunosuppressive potential of FK778 combined with TRL, SRL and EVL with the same combinations using Mycophenolic acid (MPA) as antimetabolite."( Role of FK778 alone or in combination with tacrolimus or mTOR inhibitors as an immunomodulator of immunofunctions: in vitro evaluation of T cell proliferation and the expression of lymphocyte surface antigens.
Barceló, JJ; Brunet, M; Fortuna, V; Jiménez, O; Millán, O,
)
0.61
"To assess early intervention with pimecrolimus combined with corticosteroid (CS) for major flares in patients with severe atopic dermatitis (AD)."( Safety and efficacy of early intervention with pimecrolimus cream 1% combined with corticosteroids for major flares in infants and children with atopic dermatitis.
Abrams, K; Kianifard, F; Korman, N; Molina, C; Siegfried, E, 2006
)
0.33
" In conclusion, this study demonstrates that OEC grafts combined with FK506 promote additive repair of spinal cord injuries to those exerted by single treatments, the effect being more remarkable when the spinal cord is partially lesioned."( Olfactory ensheathing glia graft in combination with FK506 administration promote repair after spinal cord injury.
Forés, J; López-Vales, R; Navarro, X; Verdú, E, 2006
)
0.33
" This research is designed to investigate the neuroprotective effects of long-term treatment with EGb761 (a standard form of the extract of Ginkgo biloba leaf) in combination with MgSO(4), FK506, or MK-801 on the infarct volume of male gerbils' brain induced by unilateral middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO)."( Ginkgo biloba leaf extract (EGb761) combined with neuroprotective agents reduces the infarct volumes of gerbil ischemic brain.
Cheng, FC; Chung, SY; Lee, MS; Lin, JY; Lin, MC; Wang, MF, 2006
)
0.33
" In mice, FTY720 administered in combination with CsA during 21 days has prolonged skin allograft survival without causing significant renal changes."( Tacrolimus in combination with FTY720--an analysis of renal and blood parameters.
Bueno, V; Burdmann, EA; Franco, M; Gallo, AP; Silva, LB, 2006
)
1.78
"1% FK506 used alone or combined with keratoplasty on patients with recurrent Mooren's ulcer."( Effect of topical FK506 used alone or combined with keratoplasty on patients with recurrent Mooren's corneal ulcer.
Chen, J; Lin, Y; Liu, Y; Xie, H; Ye, C; Zhou, S, 2006
)
0.33
"1% FK506 alone or combined with keratoplasty."( Effect of topical FK506 used alone or combined with keratoplasty on patients with recurrent Mooren's corneal ulcer.
Chen, J; Lin, Y; Liu, Y; Xie, H; Ye, C; Zhou, S, 2006
)
0.33
"1% FK506 used alone or combined with keratoplasty is a safe and effective therapy for patients with recurrent Mooren's ulcer."( Effect of topical FK506 used alone or combined with keratoplasty on patients with recurrent Mooren's corneal ulcer.
Chen, J; Lin, Y; Liu, Y; Xie, H; Ye, C; Zhou, S, 2006
)
0.33
" We assessed the efficacy and safety of the introduction of universal valganciclovir prophylaxis in combination with a tacrolimus/mycophenolate-based regimen in kidney transplantation at our centre."( Efficacy and safety of universal valganciclovir prophylaxis combined with a tacrolimus/mycophenolate-based regimen in kidney transplantation.
Fellay, J; Fontana, M; Manuel, O; Matter, M; Meylan, PR; Pascual, M; Sturzenegger, N; Venetz, JP; Wasserfallen, JB, 2007
)
0.78
" Immunosuppressive strategy consisted of daclizumab (2 doses of 1mg/Kg) in combination with steroids, mycophenolate mofetil (2g/daily during the first 45 days and then adjusted according to local practice) and Tacrolimus."( [Daclizumab in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and a late introduction of Tacrolimus at low doses, as a therapeutic approach in the elderly renal transplant donor-recipients pairs in kidney transplant].
Cantarell, C; Capdevilla, L; Gentil, MA; González Molina, M; Mazuecos, A; Osuna, A; Pereira, P, 2008
)
0.76
"In this study, we examined whether cyclosporine was effective when combined with everolimus in clinical heart transplantation (HT)."( Heart transplantation under cyclosporine or tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil or everolimus.
Chen, YS; Chi, NH; Chou, NK; Huang, SC; Ko, WJ; Sun, CD; Tsao, CI; Wang, CH; Wang, SS; Wu, IH; Yu, HY, 2008
)
0.61
" altered renal and hepatic function, catecholamine-related circulatory changes, altered drug volume of distribution, enteral versus parenteral feeding and morbid obesity, along with concomitant multiple drug regimens may account for the wide inter-individual variability in drug exposure and response in critically ill patients and for the high risk for drug-drug interactions to occur."( Mini-series: II. clinical aspects. clinically relevant CYP450-mediated drug interactions in the ICU.
de Hoon, J; Meersseman, W; Spriet, I; von Winckelmann, S; Willems, L; Wilmer, A, 2009
)
0.35
"This manuscript will cover a practical overview of clinically relevant CYP450-mediated drug-drug interactions."( Mini-series: II. clinical aspects. clinically relevant CYP450-mediated drug interactions in the ICU.
de Hoon, J; Meersseman, W; Spriet, I; von Winckelmann, S; Willems, L; Wilmer, A, 2009
)
0.35
" The similar safety and efficacy seen with MMF plus standard or reduced doses of tacrolimus suggest that MMF could be combined with reduced doses of tacrolimus."( Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in combination with standard-dose or reduced-dose tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients.
Barcéna, R; Bernardos, A; Bouw, R; Bowles, M; Durand, F; Herrero, JI; Ives, J; Klempnauer, J; Mamelok, R; Marotta, P; McKay, D; Mentha, G; Nashan, B; Neuhaus, P; Patch, D; Saliba, F; Truman, M, 2009
)
0.79
"Although voriconazole has been shown to interact with calcineurin inhibitors, this interaction has not been thoroughly examined."( Drug interaction between voriconazole and calcineurin inhibitors in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.
Aisa, Y; Ikeda, Y; Kato, J; Mori, T; Nakamura, Y; Okamoto, S, 2009
)
0.35
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were measured, including dose and trough blood levels (C(0)), area under the serum concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC(0-12h)), and apparent clearance of oral FK506 (CL/F) for FK506 alone (about 3 months before starting CBZ) and combined with CBZ (11 days and about 3 months after starting CBZ)."( Drug interaction between tacrolimus and carbamazepine in a Japanese heart transplant recipient: a case report.
Kato, TS; Komamura, K; Kotake, T; Mano, A; Morishita, H; Nakatani, T; Ochi, H; Oda, N; Okada, H; Sakai, M; Takada, M; Wada, K, 2009
)
0.66
"Concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents and antiretroviral drugs may lead to complex drug-drug interactions."( Drug-drug interaction in a kidney transplant recipient receiving HIV salvage therapy and tacrolimus.
Battegay, M; Marzolini, C; Mayr, M; Mertz, D, 2009
)
0.57
" In combination with intravenous tacrolimus and minidose methotrexate (5 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, and 6), MMF was orally administered at 30 mg/kg daily in three divided doses between days 7 and 27."( Mycophenolate mofetil combined with tacrolimus and minidose methotrexate after unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning.
Hishizawa, M; Hori, T; Ichinohe, T; Imada, K; Ishikawa, T; Kadowaki, N; Kanda, J; Kawabata, H; Kondo, T; Matsui, M; Mizumoto, C; Nishikori, M; Takaori-Kondo, A; Uchiyama, T; Yamashita, K, 2009
)
0.91
"Recently, topical immunomodulators have been successfully used in monotherapy or in combination with other therapeutic modalities in vitiligo."( The efficacy of pimecrolimus 1% cream combined with microdermabrasion in the treatment of nonsegmental childhood vitiligo: a randomized placebo-controlled study.
Daraei, Z; Esfandiarpour, I; Farajzadeh, S; Hosseini, SH,
)
0.13
" The primary outcome was determined for the entire cohort, whereas the coprimary endpoint was determined only for 2 groups of patients: those who started and remained on a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) alone, that is, the CNI-alone group (n = 624), and those who started and remained on a CNI in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), that is, the MMF group (n = 117)."( Long-term renal function in liver transplant recipients and impact of immunosuppressive regimens (calcineurin inhibitors alone or in combination with mycophenolate mofetil): the TRY study.
Calmus, Y; Deray, G; Dumortier, J; Duvoux, C; Janus, N; Karie-Guigues, S; Launay-Vacher, V; Lorho, R; Pageaux, GP; Saliba, F, 2009
)
0.35
"To investigate the efficiency and safety of two-dose steroid combined with two-dose daclizumab and tacrolimus (FK506) regimen in liver transplant recipients."( [Two-dose steroid combined with two-dose daclizumab and tacrolimus regimen in liver transplant recipients].
He, XS; Hu, AB; Huang, JF; Ju, WQ; Ma, Y; Tai, Q; Tan, YL; Wang, DP; Wu, LW; Zhu, XF, 2009
)
0.82
"Two-dose steroid combined with two-dose daclizumab and tacrolimus would be a safe and efficient immunosuppression strategy without increase the acute rejection rate hazard, that could reduce post-transplant infection and other complications from side-effect of long-term usage of steroid."( [Two-dose steroid combined with two-dose daclizumab and tacrolimus regimen in liver transplant recipients].
He, XS; Hu, AB; Huang, JF; Ju, WQ; Ma, Y; Tai, Q; Tan, YL; Wang, DP; Wu, LW; Zhu, XF, 2009
)
0.85
" We compared induction with RATG combined with either cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (FK) in regard to the number of ARE in the first year after transplantation."( Comparison of cyclosporine and tacrolimus in combination with rabbit antithymocyte immunoglobulins as induction therapy in cardiac transplantation.
Carrier, M; Jacques, F; Pellerin, M; Pelletier, GB; Perrault, LP; Racine, N; White, M, 2009
)
0.87
"The objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to compare the effectiveness and safety of induction with and without antithymocyte globulin (ATG) combined with cyclosporine/tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in renal transplantation."( Induction with and without antithymocyte globulin combined with cyclosporine/tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Liu, AP; Luo, XF; Tian, JH; Wang, X; Yang, KH; Zhang, J, 2009
)
0.77
"Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN), a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults, is usually treated with corticosteroids in combination with cyclophosphamide or cyclosporine."( Tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids in treatment of nephrotic idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Chen, JH; Chen, M; Li, H; Li, XW; Li, XY; Lu, FM; Ni, ZH; Wang, HY; Xu, FF, 2010
)
1.8
"The islet isolation method combined with a potent anti-inflammation strategy made it possible to achieve single-donor islet transplantation achieving a high SUITO index."( ET-Kyoto ductal injection and density-adjusted purification combined with potent anti-inflammatory strategy facilitated single-donor islet transplantation: case reports.
Levy, MF; Matsumoto, S; Naziruddin, B; Noguchi, H; Olsen, G; Onaca, N; Shimoda, M; Takita, M; Tamura, Y,
)
0.13
" A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model estimating oral clearance, between-patient variability in oral clearance, central volume of distribution, and residual variability in combination with historical estimates of first-order absorption rate constant, intercompartmental clearance, and peripheral volume of distribution adequately described the sparse MPA data."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis of mycophenolic acid coadministered with either tasocitinib (CP-690,550) or tacrolimus in adult renal allograft recipients.
Busque, S; Chan, G; Krishnaswami, S; Lamba, M; Melcher, M; Tafti, B, 2010
)
0.57
"The present study was designed to investigate the effect of low-dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) tacrolimus combined with a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor on renal function in transplant recipients without allograft nephropathy."( Low-dose calcineurin inhibitor regimen combined with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors preserves kidney functions in renal transplant recipients without allograft nephropathy.
Gurkan, A; Kacar, S; Karaca, C; Tilif, S; Varılsuha, C, 2010
)
0.58
"1 years underwent renal transplantation and were switched to a new second-line treatment of low-dose CNI combined with an mTOR inhibitor, either sirolimus or everolimus."( Low-dose calcineurin inhibitor regimen combined with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors preserves kidney functions in renal transplant recipients without allograft nephropathy.
Gurkan, A; Kacar, S; Karaca, C; Tilif, S; Varılsuha, C, 2010
)
0.36
"Low-dose CNI combined with an mTOR inhibitor, as a replacement for mycophenolate mofetil or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium, seemed to prevent renal dysfunction for at least 6 months among renal transplant patients without allograft nephropathy."( Low-dose calcineurin inhibitor regimen combined with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors preserves kidney functions in renal transplant recipients without allograft nephropathy.
Gurkan, A; Kacar, S; Karaca, C; Tilif, S; Varılsuha, C, 2010
)
0.36
" However, many anti-microbial agents can interact significantly with a transplant recipient's immunosuppressive regimen, placing them at risk for a potential adverse drug reaction and prolonged hospitalization."( Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between calcineurin inhibitors and proliferation signal inhibitors with anti-microbial agents: implications for therapeutic drug monitoring.
Levi, ME; Lindenfeld, J; Mueller, SW; Page, RL, 2011
)
0.37
"4 μg/mL and did not differ when combined with standard-exposure versus reduced-exposure tacrolimus (P=0."( Pharmacokinetics of sotrastaurin combined with tacrolimus or mycophenolic acid in de novo kidney transplant recipients.
Arns, W; Budde, K; Dantal, J; Grinyo, JM; Kovarik, JM; Proot, P; Rostaing, L; Steiger, JU, 2011
)
0.85
"Sotrastaurin pharmacokinetics were similar when combined with reduced-exposure or standard-exposure tacrolimus or with MPA."( Pharmacokinetics of sotrastaurin combined with tacrolimus or mycophenolic acid in de novo kidney transplant recipients.
Arns, W; Budde, K; Dantal, J; Grinyo, JM; Kovarik, JM; Proot, P; Rostaing, L; Steiger, JU, 2011
)
0.84
" We have shown in vitro that ezetimibe and tacrolimus may interact in competition for intestinal UGT1A1 and ABCB1 at concentrations reached in gut lumen after oral administration."( Drug interactions between the immunosuppressant tacrolimus and the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe in healthy volunteers.
Engel, A; Hanke, U; Keiser, M; Lütjohann, D; Modess, C; Nassif, A; Oswald, S; Runge, D; Siegmund, W; Ulrich, A; Weitschies, W, 2011
)
0.89
" Identification and elimination of such drug-drug interactions is necessary to assure adequate immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients."( Clinically significant drug-drug interaction between tacrolimus and phenobarbital: the price we pay.
Marfo, K; Siddiqi, N, 2010
)
0.61
" Novel neoadjuvant therapy protocols combined with demolitive surgery and liver transplantation seem to achieve successful results in terms of overall and disease-free survivals."( Neoadjuvant therapy protocol and liver transplantation in combination with pancreatoduodenectomy for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma occurring in a case of primary sclerosing cholangitis: case report with a more than 8-year disease-free survival
Bassi, D; Boccagni, P; Boetto, R; Cillo, U; D'Amico, F; D'Amico, FE; Gringeri, E; Lodo, E; Polacco, M; Vitale, A; Zanus, G, 2011
)
0.37
"FTY720 (fingolimod), a novel immunomodulator, has demonstrated potential for prevention of acute rejection in combination with cyclosporine."( FTY720 combined with tacrolimus in de novo renal transplantation: 1-year, multicenter, open-label randomized study.
Abramowicz, D; Hoitsma, AJ; Proot, P; Vanrenterghem, Y; Woodle, ES, 2011
)
0.69
"FTY720 combined with tacrolimus and steroids did not show a significant therapeutic advantage over MMF for the prevention of acute rejection in de novo renal transplant recipients."( FTY720 combined with tacrolimus in de novo renal transplantation: 1-year, multicenter, open-label randomized study.
Abramowicz, D; Hoitsma, AJ; Proot, P; Vanrenterghem, Y; Woodle, ES, 2011
)
1.01
"Three hundred adult kidney recipients (median age 48 years) were enrolled over 3 years to receive EC-MPS de novo (n=175), as a switch from azathioprine (n=62) or mycophenolate mofetil MMF (n=63); in combination with calcineurin inhibitor."( Tolerance of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in combination with calcineurin inhibitor in kidney transplant recipients: Polish experience.
Chmura, A; Durlik, M; Galazka, Z; Gozdowska, J; Urbanowicz, AL, 2011
)
0.37
"EC-MPS was tolerated better by younger kidney recipients, when combined with tacrolimus versus cyclosporine, and when introduced earlier after transplantation."( Tolerance of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in combination with calcineurin inhibitor in kidney transplant recipients: Polish experience.
Chmura, A; Durlik, M; Galazka, Z; Gozdowska, J; Urbanowicz, AL, 2011
)
0.6
" We sought to determine the safety of GO in combination with busulfan/cyclophosphamide (Bu/Cy) conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT)."( A Phase I study of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) in combination with busulfan and cyclophosphamide (Bu/Cy) and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in children with poor-risk CD33+ AML: a new targeted immunochemotherapy myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regim
Baxter-Lowe, LA; Bhatia, M; Cairo, MS; Dela Cruz, F; Duffy, D; Foley, S; Garvin, JH; George, D; Hawks, R; Jin, Z; Le Gall, J; Morris, E; Satwani, P; Schwartz, J; van de Ven, C, 2012
)
0.38
"Tacrolimus is a well-known potent immunosuppressant agent, which has various drug-drug or food-drug interactions."( Food-drug interaction of tacrolimus with pomelo, ginger, and turmeric juice in rats.
Egashira, K; Higuchi, S; Ieiri, I; Sasaki, H, 2012
)
2.13
"There is evidence suggesting that sirolimus, in combination with tacrolimus, is active in the prevention of graft-versus-host disease."( A randomized phase II study to evaluate tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or methotrexate after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.
Alsina, M; Anasetti, C; Ayala, E; Betts, BC; Fernandez, HF; Field, T; Janssen, WE; Jim, H; Kharfan-Dabaja, MA; Kim, J; Locke, FL; Nishihori, T; Ochoa, L; Perez, L; Perkins, J; Pidala, J; Tomblyn, M; Veerapathran, A; Xu, M, 2012
)
0.88
" The aim of this study was to assess the clinical behaviour and long-term therapeutic response in OFG patients treated with intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injections alone or in combination with topical pimecrolimus 1%, as adjuvant, in those patients partially responders to TA."( Clinical behaviour and long-term therapeutic response in orofacial granulomatosis patients treated with intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injections alone or in combination with topical pimecrolimus 1%.
Fortuna, G; Leuci, S; Mignogna, MD; Pollio, A; Ruoppo, E, 2013
)
0.39
"In this pilot study, donor-derived bone marrow MSCs combined with a sparing dose of tacrolimus (50% of standard dose) were administered to six de novo living-related kidney transplant recipients."( Donor-derived mesenchymal stem cells combined with low-dose tacrolimus prevent acute rejection after renal transplantation: a clinical pilot study.
Chen, X; Chen, Z; Fang, J; Ke, M; Li, G; Li, X; Liao, D; Liu, L; Ma, J; Pan, G; Peng, Y; Xia, W; Xiang, AP; Xu, L, 2013
)
0.86
"The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the CYP3A5*3 allele on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and amlodipine, and drug-drug interactions between them in healthy subjects."( Effect of CYP3A5*3 polymorphism on pharmacokinetic drug interaction between tacrolimus and amlodipine.
Barrett, JS; Cheng, ZN; Guo, R; Li, J; Li, PJ; Li, ZJ; Liu, SK; Liu, Z; Ouyang, DS; Tan, HY; Wang, CJ; Wang, JL; Xie, YL; Yang, GP; Yuan, H; Zhang, BK; Zhou, LY; Zhou, YN; Zuo, XC, 2013
)
0.83
" To recapitulate a clinical context where Hsp90 or calcineurin inhibitors could be utilized in combination with azoles to render resistant pathogens responsive to treatment, the evolution experiment was initiated with strains that are resistant to azoles in a manner that depends on Hsp90 and calcineurin."( Genetic and genomic architecture of the evolution of resistance to antifungal drug combinations.
Ammar, R; Cowen, LE; Hill, JA; Nislow, C; Torti, D, 2013
)
0.39
" This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of alefacept compared with placebo when combined with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids in de novo renal transplant recipients."( Alefacept combined with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids in de novo kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial.
Charpentier, B; First, R; Franks, B; Glyda, M; Hettich, F; Holman, JM; Houbiers, JG; Rigotti, P; Rostaing, L, 2013
)
0.91
" In contrast, sofosbuvir and daclatasvir based antiviral therapy are not expected to lead to clinically significant drug-drug interactions in LT recipients but confirmatory studies are needed."( Drug-drug interactions with oral anti-HCV agents and idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity in the liver transplant setting.
Fontana, RJ; Tischer, S, 2014
)
0.4
" Our data indicate that the concentration of MPA should be monitored in clinical therapy when EC-MPS is combined with different calcineurin inhibitors to reduce acute allograft rejection and avoid adverse events."( Cyclosporine A and tacrolimus combined with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium influence the plasma mycophenolic acid concentration - a randomised controlled trial in Chinese live related donor kidney transplant recipients.
Chen, JH; Chen, Y; Huang, HF; Shen-Tu, JZ; Xie, WQ; Yao, X, 2014
)
0.73
" Low-dose (2 mg/kg) or high-dose (5 mg/kg) ASKP1240, in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (15 mg/kg) or tacrolimus (1 mg/kg), showed a significantly longer allograft survival time compared with monotherapy groups."( Effects of ASKP1240 combined with tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil on renal allograft survival in Cynomolgus monkeys.
Bai, J; Chen, H; Daloze, P; Dun, H; Hu, Y; Kinugasa, F; Ma, A; Miura, T; Miyao, Y; Okimura, K; Song, L; Sudo, Y; Zeng, L; Zhang, G, 2014
)
0.89
"The present study indicates that ASKP1240, alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive drugs, could be a promising antirejection agent in organ transplantation."( Effects of ASKP1240 combined with tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil on renal allograft survival in Cynomolgus monkeys.
Bai, J; Chen, H; Daloze, P; Dun, H; Hu, Y; Kinugasa, F; Ma, A; Miura, T; Miyao, Y; Okimura, K; Song, L; Sudo, Y; Zeng, L; Zhang, G, 2014
)
0.68
"A new approach for proteome-wide profiling drug binding proteins by using monolithic capillary affinity chromatography in combination with HPLC-MS/MS is reported."( Profiling of drug binding proteins by monolithic affinity chromatography in combination with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Han, B; Kang, J; Wang, L; Wang, T; Zhang, H; Zhang, X, 2014
)
0.4
" Some clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with glucocorticoids and sirolimus are also highlighted."( Tacrolimus in pancreas transplant: a focus on toxicity, diabetogenic effect and drug-drug interactions.
Rangel, EB, 2014
)
1.85
" Our study showed that use of TAC plus ADM resulted in improved patient survival, tolerance of the graft, and remission compared to CycA combined with ADM."( A retrospective study to compare the use of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in combination with adriamycin in post-transplant liver cancer patients.
Fan, H; Gu, L; Jin, W; Kan, L; Shan, C; Wang, X, 2015
)
0.68
" We herein present a case of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) combined with Sjögren's syndrome (SS) successfully treated with tacrolimus."( Patient with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder combined with Sjögren's syndrome relapse free following tacrolimus treatment.
Ge, P; Li, H; Liu, X; Liu, Y; Mu, W; Yang, W; Zhang, X; Zheng, X, 2014
)
0.82
" We aimed to determine the pharmacokinetics of a reduced dose of MMF and to validate its feasibility in combination with tacrolimus in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT)."( Safety of reduced dose of mycophenolate mofetil combined with tacrolimus in living-donor liver transplantation.
Choi, Y; Hong, G; Jeong, J; Kim, H; Kim, J; Lee, HW; Lee, J; Lee, JM; Lee, KW; Moon, MR; Park, MS; Suh, KS; Suh, SW; Yi, NJ; You, TS, 2014
)
0.85
" However, reducing the dose of MMF combined with a low level of tacrolimus was feasible clinically, with an excellent short-term outcome in LDLT."( Safety of reduced dose of mycophenolate mofetil combined with tacrolimus in living-donor liver transplantation.
Choi, Y; Hong, G; Jeong, J; Kim, H; Kim, J; Lee, HW; Lee, J; Lee, JM; Lee, KW; Moon, MR; Park, MS; Suh, KS; Suh, SW; Yi, NJ; You, TS, 2014
)
0.88
" We compared the efficacy and safety of ABT administered to patients in combination with TAC, methotrexate (MTX), or other drugs."( Comparison of efficacy and safety of tacrolimus and methotrexate in combination with abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; a retrospective observational study in the TBC Registry.
Fujibayashi, T; Fukaya, N; Hirano, Y; Ishiguro, N; Kaneko, A; Kawasaki, M; Kida, D; Kojima, T; Miyake, H; Oguchi, T; Takahashi, N; Takemoto, T; Tsuboi, S; Yabe, Y, 2015
)
0.69
" We hypothesized that de novo therapy with low-dose SRL combined with a CNI could still prevent cancer in renal transplant recipients."( De novo cancer avoidance after renal transplantation: A case-control study on low-dose sirolimus combined with a calcineurin inhibitor.
Chen, KH; Hu, RH; Lee, CY; Tsai, MK; Wu, FL; Yang, CY; Yeh, CC, 2015
)
0.42
"De novo therapy with low-dose SRL combined with a CNI was associated with reduced risk of post-transplant cancer in renal transplant recipients."( De novo cancer avoidance after renal transplantation: A case-control study on low-dose sirolimus combined with a calcineurin inhibitor.
Chen, KH; Hu, RH; Lee, CY; Tsai, MK; Wu, FL; Yang, CY; Yeh, CC, 2015
)
0.42
" Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with cyclosporine and tacrolimus hindered the use of first-generation protease inhibitors in transplant recipients."( An open-label investigation into drug-drug interactions between multiple doses of daclatasvir and single-dose cyclosporine or tacrolimus in healthy subjects.
Adamczyk, R; Bertz, RJ; Bifano, M; Hwang, C; Kandoussi, H; Marion, A, 2015
)
0.87
"A number of studies have provided information regarding the risks and benefits of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTOR-I) combined with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) versus mycophenolic acid (MPA)."( mTOR inhibitor versus mycophenolic acid as the primary immunosuppression regime combined with calcineurin inhibitor for kidney transplant recipients: a meta-analysis.
Chen, J; Jiang, Y; Lai, X; Shou, Z; Xiang, S; Xie, X, 2015
)
0.42
" Randomized controlled trials comparing mTOR-I to MPA as the primary immunosuppressive regimen in combination with CNI were selected and meta-analyzed."( mTOR inhibitor versus mycophenolic acid as the primary immunosuppression regime combined with calcineurin inhibitor for kidney transplant recipients: a meta-analysis.
Chen, J; Jiang, Y; Lai, X; Shou, Z; Xiang, S; Xie, X, 2015
)
0.42
" Notably, mTOR-I had an increased risk of graft loss when combined with CNI, even when combined with a reduced dose of CNI."( mTOR inhibitor versus mycophenolic acid as the primary immunosuppression regime combined with calcineurin inhibitor for kidney transplant recipients: a meta-analysis.
Chen, J; Jiang, Y; Lai, X; Shou, Z; Xiang, S; Xie, X, 2015
)
0.42
"To compare the characteristics of the enteric-coated formulation of mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, myfortic) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, CellCept) given in combination with tacrolimus in Asian renal-transplant recipients."( Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium given in combination with tacrolimus has a lower incidence of serious infections in Asian renal-transplant recipients compared with mycophenolate mofetil.
Bow, LM; Feng, JJ; Tian, J; Zhang, LW; Zhao, P, 2015
)
0.85
"Enteric-coated formulation of mycophenolate sodium, given in combination with tacrolimus, has a lower incidence of serious infection in Asian renal-transplant recipients compared with MMF, and the therapeutic effect of EC-MPS is similar to MMF."( Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium given in combination with tacrolimus has a lower incidence of serious infections in Asian renal-transplant recipients compared with mycophenolate mofetil.
Bow, LM; Feng, JJ; Tian, J; Zhang, LW; Zhao, P, 2015
)
0.89
" Eighteen healthy volunteers, including 6 individuals in each CYP2C19 genotype (extensive metabolizers [EMs], intermediate metabolizers [IMs], and poor metabolizers [PMs]), received a single oral dose of 3 mg tacrolimus alone or in combination with 200 mg voriconazole twice daily at steady state."( Impact of cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus when coadministered with voriconazole.
Furihata, K; Imamura, CK; Okamoto, S; Tanigawara, Y, 2016
)
0.85
"To investigate the clinical effect of double dose of valsartan combined with tacrolimus in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy (DN)."( Clinical study of double dose of valsartan combined with tacrolimus in treatment of diabetic nephropathy.
Hou, XL; Jin, H; Wu, J; Zhang, B; Zhang, HB; Zhang, HN, 2016
)
0.91
" Patients were randomly divided into three groups according to the sequence of admission, group A (conventional dose of valsartan group, n = 28 cases), group B (double dose of valsartan group, n = 29 cases) and group C (double dose of valsartan combined with tacrolimus group, n = 29)."( Clinical study of double dose of valsartan combined with tacrolimus in treatment of diabetic nephropathy.
Hou, XL; Jin, H; Wu, J; Zhang, B; Zhang, HB; Zhang, HN, 2016
)
0.86
"Double dose of valsartan combined with tacrolimus treatment of DN patients can improve clinical symptoms, reducing inflammation, inhibiting or even reversing the interstitial fibrosis, which will improve the curative effect and reduce the recurrence, as to provide a new theoretical basis for the clinical treatment of the disease."( Clinical study of double dose of valsartan combined with tacrolimus in treatment of diabetic nephropathy.
Hou, XL; Jin, H; Wu, J; Zhang, B; Zhang, HB; Zhang, HN, 2016
)
0.95
"44 g/day or mycophenolate mofetil at 2 g/day) with tacrolimus; in combination with corticosteroids."( Design and rationale of the ATHENA study--A 12-month, multicentre, prospective study evaluating the outcomes of a de novo everolimus-based regimen in combination with reduced cyclosporine or tacrolimus versus a standard regimen in kidney transplant patien
Dragun, D; Hauser, IA; Nashan, B; Schenker, P; Sommerer, C; Suwelack, B; Thaiss, F, 2016
)
0.88
" In this pilot study, we investigated the use of low-dose tacrolimus in combination with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which are immunosuppressive and prolong allograft survival in experimental organ transplant models."( Low-dose tacrolimus combined with donor-derived mesenchymal stem cells after renal transplantation: a prospective, non-randomized study.
Chen, XY; Chen, Z; Fang, JL; Guo, YH; Li, GH; Liu, LS; Ma, JJ; Pan, GH; Peng, YW; Xiang, P; Xu, L; Zhang, L; Zhu, JH, 2016
)
1.1
" In the present study, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of 15-10-10 MTX (day +1: 15 mg/m(2); days +3 and +6: 10 mg/m(2)) with 10-7-7 MTX (day +1: 10 mg/m(2); day +3 and +6: 7 mg/m(2)) in combination with tacrolimus."( Reduced-dose methotrexate in combination with tacrolimus was associated with rapid engraftment and recovery from oral mucositis without affecting the incidence of GVHD.
Endo, T; Fujimoto, K; Goto, H; Hashimoto, D; Hashino, S; Kahata, K; Kashiwazaki, H; Kondo, T; Matsukawa, T; Matsushita, T; Nakazawa, S; Onozawa, M; Sugita, J; Teshima, T; Yamazaki, Y, 2016
)
0.88
"Sirolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor that is being used to prevent organ rejection in kidney transplant patients often in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs; cyclosporine and tacrolimus)."( Risk Assessment of Drug-Drug Interactions of Calcineurin Inhibitors Affecting Sirolimus Pharmacokinetics in Renal Transplant Patients.
Emoto, C; Fukuda, T; Vinks, AA, 2016
)
0.62
" In this pilot (24 patients) left-right comparative study we addressed efficiency of prostaglandin F2α analogue latanoprost versus tacrolimus when combined with narrow-band ultraviolet B and microneedling in repigmentation of nonsegmental vitiligo lesions."( A pilot comparative study of topical latanoprost and tacrolimus in combination with narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy and microneedling for the treatment of nonsegmental vitiligo.
Korobko, IV; Lomonosov, KM, 2016
)
0.89
"The antifungal activity of tacrolimus in combination with antifungal agents against different fungal species has been previously reported."( Antifungal activities of tacrolimus in combination with antifungal agents against fluconazole-susceptible and fluconazole-resistant Trichosporon asahii isolates.
Alves, SH; Azevedo, MI; Denardi, LB; Kubiça, TF; Oliveira, V; Santurio, JM; Severo, LC,
)
0.73
"Our objectives were to compare the clinical outcomes of mizoribine (12 mg/kg/d) and mycophenolate mofetil (2000 mg/d) in combination with tacrolimus, basiliximab, and corticosteroids."( A Prospective Randomized, Comparative Trial of High-Dose Mizoribine Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Combination With Tacrolimus and Basiliximab for Living Donor Renal Transplant: A Multicenter Trial.
Akiyama, T; Amada, N; Chikaraishi, T; Ishida, H; Takahara, S; Takahashi, K; Tanabe, K; Toma, H; Tomikawa, S; Uchida, K, 2016
)
0.85
" This prospective multi-institutional randomized comparative study compared mizoribine (n = 41) and mycophenolate mofetil (n = 42) in combination with tacrolimus, basiliximab, and corticosteroids for living-donor renal transplant recipients."( A Prospective Randomized, Comparative Trial of High-Dose Mizoribine Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Combination With Tacrolimus and Basiliximab for Living Donor Renal Transplant: A Multicenter Trial.
Akiyama, T; Amada, N; Chikaraishi, T; Ishida, H; Takahara, S; Takahashi, K; Tanabe, K; Toma, H; Tomikawa, S; Uchida, K, 2016
)
0.84
" We examined the efficacy and safety of MMF in its different forms combined with tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients."( Low-dose mycophenolate mofetil in tablet form or capsule form combined with tacrolimus in the early period after kidney transplantation: a prospective randomized trial
.
Cho, BH; Cho, HR; Huh, KH; Ju, MK; Kim, CD; Kim, YS; Lee, DR; Lee, JJ; Lee, S; Lee, SH; Oh, CK; Park, JW; So, BJ, 2016
)
0.89
"Low-dose MMF in tablet form combined with tacrolimus can be considered as an efficacious and safe immunosuppressive regimen in the early period after kidney transplantation."( Low-dose mycophenolate mofetil in tablet form or capsule form combined with tacrolimus in the early period after kidney transplantation: a prospective randomized trial
.
Cho, BH; Cho, HR; Huh, KH; Ju, MK; Kim, CD; Kim, YS; Lee, DR; Lee, JJ; Lee, S; Lee, SH; Oh, CK; Park, JW; So, BJ, 2016
)
0.93
" No pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were expected between tacrolimus and the selected DAAs."( Decreased tacrolimus plasma concentrations during HCV therapy: a drug-drug interaction or is there an alternative explanation?
Burger, DM; de Kanter, CT; Drenth, JP; Pape, S; Smolders, EJ; van den Berg, AP, 2017
)
1.09
"We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) combined with corticosteroids in treating patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN)."( Therapy of tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids in idiopathic membranous nephropathy.
Cui, W; Dong, W; Guan, S; Li, Q; Li, W; Liu, M; Lu, X; Luo, M; Luo, P; Miao, L; Min, X; Wang, Y, 2017
)
1.11
" The authors used appropriate linear regression univariate models and created 5 different multivariate models to examine individual drug-drug interactions (DDIs)."( A Retrospective Study on Mycophenolic Acid Drug Interactions: Effect of Prednisone, Sirolimus, and Tacrolimus With MPA.
Alvarez-Elías, AC; Filler, G; Singh, RN; Todorova, EK; Yoo, EC, 2017
)
0.67
"We randomly assigned 158 renal transplant patients to receive low-dose SRL or MMF in combination with ER-TAC and corticosteroid."( De novo low-dose sirolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in combination with extended-release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: a multicentre, open-label, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial.
Cho, HR; Ha, J; Huh, KH; Ju, MK; Jung, CW; Kim, CD; Kim, YS; Lee, JG; Lim, BJ; Oh, CK, 2017
)
0.67
" We aimed to predict the contribution of schisantherin A and schisandrin A to drug-drug interaction (DDI) between Wuzhi capsule and tacrolimus using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling."( Prediction of Drug-Drug Interaction between Tacrolimus and Principal Ingredients of Wuzhi Capsule in Chinese Healthy Volunteers Using Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling.
Bu, F; Cai, W; Jiao, Z; Li, L; Lin, HS; Ma, G; Shin, JG; Xiang, X; Zhang, H; Zhuang, X, 2018
)
0.95
"A regimen of high-dose mizoribine in combination with calcineurin inhibitors basiliximab, and corticosteroids can provide effective immunosuppression while lowering the rate of cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant patients."( High-dose mizoribine combined with calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), basiliximab and corticosteroids for renal transplantation: A Japanese multicenter study.
Akioka, K; Kawakita, M; Nakamura, N; Nakatani, T; Nishimura, K; Nishioka, T; Ushigome, H; Watarai, Y; Yoshimura, N; Yuzawa, K, 2018
)
0.71
"Microneedling combined with 5-fluorouracil or tacrolimus is safe and effective treatment of vitiligo."( Comparison between the efficacy of microneedling combined with 5-fluorouracil vs microneedling with tacrolimus in the treatment of vitiligo.
Al-Saeid, H; Elgarhy, L; Ibrahim, Z; Mina, M, 2018
)
0.96
"MMF in combination with tacrolimus induced S-phase cell-cycle arrest and markedly inhibited HT-29 cell proliferation."( Mycophenolate Mofetil Alone and in Combination with Tacrolimus Inhibits the Proliferation of HT-29 Human Colonic Adenocarcinoma Cell Line and Might Interfere with Colonic Tumorigenesis.
Lamprecht, S; Ling, E; Ling, G; Osyntsov, L; Pinsk, I; Pinsk, V; Shubinsky, G; Yerushalmi, B, 2018
)
1.04
" We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the effects of TAC combined with glucocorticoid on IgAN."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus combined with glucocorticoid treatment for IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis.
Hu, B; Luo, J; Ma, T; Zhang, Y, 2018
)
0.79
" This was a sequential, single-center, open-label phase 1 study to assess the drug-drug interaction potential between SCY-078 and tacrolimus during concomitant administration in healthy subjects."( Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Drug-Drug Interaction Potential for Coadministered SCY-078, an Oral Fungicidal Glucan Synthase Inhibitor, and Tacrolimus.
Angulo, D; Atiee, G; Corr, C; Hyman, M; Murphy, G; Willett, M; Wring, S, 2019
)
0.92
" Apixaban 10 mg was administered orally alone, in combination with 100 mg cyclosporine or 5 mg tacrolimus."( Drug-Drug Interaction Study of Apixaban with Cyclosporine and Tacrolimus in Healthy Volunteers.
Bashir, B; Chervoneva, I; Kraft, WK; Stickle, DF, 2018
)
0.94
" This retrospective case series was performed to assess the effects of tacrolimus (TAC) combined with Tripterygium wilfordii polyglycoside (TWG) in treating IMN."( Retrospective analysis of tacrolimus combined with Tripterygium wilfordii polyglycoside for treating idiopathic membranous nephropathy.
Cai, GY; Chen, XM; Duan, SW; Li, P; Li, QG; Shang, SL, 2018
)
1.01
"The included patients' treatments were tacrolimus monotherapy (TAC group, n = 33), tacrolimus combined with methylprednisolone (MP) (TAC + MP group, n = 24) and tacrolimus combined with Tripterygium wilfordii polyglycoside (TAC + TWG group, n = 21)."( Retrospective analysis of tacrolimus combined with Tripterygium wilfordii polyglycoside for treating idiopathic membranous nephropathy.
Cai, GY; Chen, XM; Duan, SW; Li, P; Li, QG; Shang, SL, 2018
)
1.05
"This retrospective study showed that TAC combined with TWG may be effective for treating IMN."( Retrospective analysis of tacrolimus combined with Tripterygium wilfordii polyglycoside for treating idiopathic membranous nephropathy.
Cai, GY; Chen, XM; Duan, SW; Li, P; Li, QG; Shang, SL, 2018
)
0.78
"A paucity of data currently exists regarding drug-drug interaction (DDI) with tacrolimus and isavuconazole coadministration."( Drug-Drug Interaction Between Isavuconazole and Tacrolimus: Is Empiric Dose Adjustment Necessary?
Alexander, MD; Armistead, PM; Daniels, LM; Kufel, WD; Ptachcinski, JR; Shaw, JR, 2020
)
1.04
"Tacrolimus is the mainstay calcineurin inhibitor frequently administered with mycophenolic acid with or without corticosteroids to prevent graft rejection in adult kidney transplant recipients."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Immediate-Release Oral Tacrolimus Co-administered with Mycophenolate Mofetil in Corticosteroid-Free Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Ensom, MHH; Kiang, TKL; Mayo, P; Rong, Y, 2019
)
2.2
"The study was designed to compare the outcomes of sirolimus (SRL) combined with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combined with TAC in kidney transplantation recipients."( Comparison of Sirolimus Combined With Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil Combined With Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation Recipients: A Meta-Analysis.
Cheng, H; Gao, L; Liu, J; Xu, F, 2018
)
0.98
"This meta-analysis suggested that SRL combined with TAC and MMF combined with TAC were equally safe and effective for the kidney transplantation recipients."( Comparison of Sirolimus Combined With Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil Combined With Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation Recipients: A Meta-Analysis.
Cheng, H; Gao, L; Liu, J; Xu, F, 2018
)
0.75
"To assess the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in combination with corticosteroids in patients with immune-mediated necrotising myopathy."( Tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids effectively improved the outcome of a cohort of patients with immune-mediated necrotising myopathy.
Bu, B; Feng, F; Ji, S; Li, Y; Wang, Q,
)
1.85
"The medical records of 20 hospitalised patients with immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM) who had received tacrolimus combined with oral prednisone from January 2014 to August 2017 were retrospectively reviewed."( Tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids effectively improved the outcome of a cohort of patients with immune-mediated necrotising myopathy.
Bu, B; Feng, F; Ji, S; Li, Y; Wang, Q,
)
1.78
" The main treatment option for IMN is the use of immunosuppressive (IS) drugs combined with glucocorticoids (GC)."( Risk of infection with different immunosuppressive drugs combined with glucocorticoids for the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A pairwise and network meta-analysis.
Hu, B; Kuang, F; Liu, D; Qing, S; Yang, Y; Yu, X, 2019
)
0.51
"Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the risk of infection in patients with IMN treated with different IS drugs combined with GC were included in the network meta-analysis."( Risk of infection with different immunosuppressive drugs combined with glucocorticoids for the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A pairwise and network meta-analysis.
Hu, B; Kuang, F; Liu, D; Qing, S; Yang, Y; Yu, X, 2019
)
0.51
"CSA + GC and POCTX+ GC were associated with a lower risk of infection than that with other IS drugs combined with GC for IMN."( Risk of infection with different immunosuppressive drugs combined with glucocorticoids for the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A pairwise and network meta-analysis.
Hu, B; Kuang, F; Liu, D; Qing, S; Yang, Y; Yu, X, 2019
)
0.51
" Three phase 1 open-label studies were conducted in healthy volunteers to evaluate the potential for clinically relevant drug-drug interactions of the glecaprevir 300-mg and pibrentasvir 120-mg combination with the immunosuppressants tacrolimus (1 mg) or cyclosporine (100 and 400 mg)."( Drug-Drug Interactions of Tacrolimus or Cyclosporine With Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir in Healthy Subjects.
Asatryan, A; Kort, J; Kosloski, MP; Li, H; Liu, W; Mensa, FJ; Pugatch, D; Zhao, W, 2019
)
1
"To study the clinical effect and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) combined with glucocorticoid (GC) versus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combined with GC in the treatment of primary IgA nephropathy (IgAN) in children."( [Clinical effect of tacrolimus combined with glucocorticoid in the treatment of IgA nephropathy in children].
Cheng, YB; Dou, WJ; Jia, LM; Tan, WX; Wang, Q; Zhang, JJ; Zhang, L; Zhao, F, 2019
)
1.1
"TAC combined with GC can effectively reduce urinary protein in children with primary IgAN, and it has a better short-term clinical effect than MMF combined with GC, with good safety."( [Clinical effect of tacrolimus combined with glucocorticoid in the treatment of IgA nephropathy in children].
Cheng, YB; Dou, WJ; Jia, LM; Tan, WX; Wang, Q; Zhang, JJ; Zhang, L; Zhao, F, 2019
)
0.84
" We report for the first time a significant drug-drug interaction between the purified CBD product and tacrolimus."( Evidence of a clinically significant drug-drug interaction between cannabidiol and tacrolimus.
Alloway, RR; Emoto, C; Fukuda, T; Leino, AD; Privitera, M; Vinks, AA, 2019
)
0.95
"After patients receive hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), both cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (TAC) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) are recommended as the standard prophylaxis strategy for graft versus host disease (GVHD) by the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation."( Comparison of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine Combined With Methotrexate for Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Chen, M; He, X; Huang, B; Lin, X; Zhang, Y; Zhang, Z; Zheng, Z; Zhong, C, 2020
)
1.14
" Further studies are still required to evaluate the effect of TAC or CsA combined with other suppressors in the treatment regimen following HSCT."( Comparison of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine Combined With Methotrexate for Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Chen, M; He, X; Huang, B; Lin, X; Zhang, Y; Zhang, Z; Zheng, Z; Zhong, C, 2020
)
0.92
"Everolimus (EVR) is often administered with cyclosporine A (CsA), according to an established protocol."( Optimal dose of everolimus administered with tacrolimus in living donor kidney transplantation.
Futamura, K; Goto, N; Hiramitsu, T; Ichimori, T; Narumi, S; Okada, M; Tomosugi, T; Watarai, Y, 2019
)
0.77
" In this study, we investigated the effect of tacrolimus (FK506) combined with GM6001,a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor, on the formation of OB using a mouse heterotopic tracheal transplantation model."( FK506 combined with GM6001 prevents tracheal obliteration in a mouse model of heterotopic tracheal transplantation.
Fan, J; Li, Y; Shu, P; Tang, L; Yang, X; Zhang, X, 2019
)
0.77
"FK506 combined with GM6001 could alleviate tracheal obliteration in mouse heterotopic tracheal transplantation model, due to its inhibitory effect on MMPs."( FK506 combined with GM6001 prevents tracheal obliteration in a mouse model of heterotopic tracheal transplantation.
Fan, J; Li, Y; Shu, P; Tang, L; Yang, X; Zhang, X, 2019
)
0.51
" Compared with the controls, ketoconazole combined with CNIs can significantly reduce the dose of CNIs in patients receiving solid organ transplantation (WMD = -203."( Efficacy and safety of ketoconazole combined with calmodulin inhibitor in solid organ transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, C; Cui, Y; Li, M; Ma, L; Wu, S; Xue, T; Yang, T; Zhou, Y, 2020
)
0.56
"Clinical use of fluconazole against fungal infections in renal transplant patients is complicated by the potentially marked and unpredictable drug-drug interactions (DDIs)."( Clinically significant drug-drug interaction between tacrolimus and fluconazole in stable renal transplant recipient and literature review.
Chen, X; He, J; Liu, H; Liu, Y; Ma, J; Yang, W; Yin, C; Yu, Y; Zhong, L; Zou, H, 2020
)
0.81
"Isotretinoin combined with topical treatments is more effective than monotherapy with clobetasol and tacrolimus for FFA."( Oral isotretinoin combined with topical clobetasol 0.05% and tacrolimus 0.1% for the treatment of frontal fibrosing alopecia: a randomized controlled trial.
Abedini, R; Amini, M; Daneshpazhooh, M; Mahmoudi, H; Nili, A; Rostami, A; Salehi Farid, A; Tavakolpour, S; Teimourpour, A, 2022
)
1.18
"Topical Tacrolimus, especially when combined with Nb-UVB, has been proven clinically to be effective in the treatment of vitiligo."( Tacrolimus (FK506) ointment combined with Nb-UVB could activate both hair follicle (HF) and dermal melanocyte precursors in vitiligo: the first histopathological and clinical study.
Almasi-Nasrabadi, M; Cario-André, M; Gauthier, Y; Ghalamkarpour, F; Pain, C; Rakhshan, A, 2021
)
2.5
" The present study was designed to explore the inhibitory effects of tacrolimus (TAC) combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on the proliferation of mesangial cells based on the cell cycle."( Evaluation of the inhibitory effect of tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil on mesangial cell proliferation based on the cell cycle.
Gao, Y; Li, R; Tian, J; Wang, Y; Yang, H; Zhou, X, 2020
)
1.06
"Potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) with immunosuppressive drugs are frequently observed in renal transplant recipients."( Assessment of Clinically Relevant Drug Interactions by Online Programs in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Bayraktar-Ekincioglu, A; Demirkan, K; Erdem, Y; Tecen-Yucel, K; Yildirim, T; Yilmaz, SR, 2020
)
0.56
" However, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information for EVL combined with TAC is limited."( Pharmacodynamic Drug-Drug Interaction on Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Between Everolimus and Tacrolimus at the Therapeutic Concentration Range in Renal Transplantation.
Akashi, I; Akiyama, S; Hirano, T; Iwamoto, H; Kihara, Y; Konno, O; Oda, T; Okihara, M; Osato, S; Takeuchi, H; Tanaka, S; Unezaki, S; Yoshinaga, R, 2021
)
0.84
" We evaluate the safety of pacritinib when administered with sirolimus plus low-dose tacrolimus (PAC/SIR/TAC) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation."( Pacritinib Combined with Sirolimus and Low-Dose Tacrolimus for GVHD Prevention after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Preclinical and Phase I Trial Results.
Anasetti, C; Bejanyan, N; Betts, BC; Blazar, BR; Davila, ML; Elmariah, H; Faramand, RG; Holtan, SG; Khimani, F; Kim, J; Lawrence, HR; Lawrence, NJ; Mishra, A; Nieder, ML; Nishihori, T; Perez, L; Pidala, J; Sagatys, EM; Sebti, SM; Walton, K, 2021
)
1.1
"To compare drug-drug interaction (DDI) between tacrolimus and different formulations of phenobarbital in paediatrics and adults."( Drug-drug interaction comparison between tacrolimus and phenobarbital in different formulations for paediatrics and adults.
Chen, J; Liu, W; Lu, X; Wang, N; Zhang, Y; Zhao, X; Zhu, L; Zuo, M, 2021
)
1.14
" Thus, here we describe the effectiveness and safety of tacrolimus ointment in combination with dupilumab for facial rashes in patients with AD."( Effectiveness and safety of tacrolimus ointment combined with dupilumab for patients with atopic dermatitis in real-world clinical practice.
Imai, Y; Inoue, Y; Kanazawa, N; Matsutani, M; Nakatani-Kusakabe, M; Natsuaki, M; Yamanishi, K, 2021
)
1.16
" These results suggest that GVHD prophylaxis with a less intensive double drug combination (PT/Cy and TAC) might be feasible after HLA-matched allo-HCT."( A phase II study of post-transplant cyclophosphamide combined with tacrolimus for GVHD prophylaxis after HLA-matched related/unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Harada, N; Hino, M; Hirose, A; Koh, H; Kuno, M; Makuuchi, Y; Nakamae, H; Nakamae, M; Nakane, T; Nakashima, Y; Nishimoto, M; Okamura, H; Takakuwa, T, 2022
)
0.96
"To explore the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) combined with corticosteroids in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN)."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Li, Y; Tian, Z; Xie, Y; Xu, J; Yang, Y, 2022
)
1.3
" All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the efficacy and safety of TAC combined with corticosteroids in IMN patients were included based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Li, Y; Tian, Z; Xie, Y; Xu, J; Yang, Y, 2022
)
1.03
" Compared with control treatment, TAC combined with corticosteroids could significantly increase the complete remission (CR) rate, total remission (TR) rate, and serum albumin levels, as well as decrease the proteinuria levels within 6-month treatment, but the advantage did not persist to 12-month treatment."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Li, Y; Tian, Z; Xie, Y; Xu, J; Yang, Y, 2022
)
1.03
"TAC combined with corticosteroids has a significant therapeutic effect for IMN patients within 1-year treatment, especially in the first 6 months."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Li, Y; Tian, Z; Xie, Y; Xu, J; Yang, Y, 2022
)
1.03
"Various factors, including genetic polymorphisms, drug-drug interactions, and patient characteristics influence the blood concentrations of tacrolimus in renal transplant patients."( Effect of drug combination on tacrolimus target dose in renal transplant patients with different
Du, Y; Guan, ZW; Li, Y; Tang, BH; Wei, AH; Zhang, SF, 2022
)
1.21
" New antiviral medications against this disease have not been properly tested yet, and their efficiency, side effects, and drug-drug interactions are not entirely known."( Paxlovid (Nirmatelvir/Ritonavir) and Tacrolimus Drug-Drug Interaction in a Kidney Transplant Patient with SARS-2-CoV infection: A Case Report.
Cameron, A; Prikis, M,
)
0.4
" This case report indicated that remdesivir might interact with cytochrome P450 3A4 substrates, such as tacrolimus and everolimus, and elevate their blood concentrations under high inflammatory conditions."( Drug-drug interaction between remdesivir and immunosuppressant agents in a kidney transplant recipient.
Hirai, T; Inoue, T; Iwamoto, T; Mizuta, A; Nishikawa, K; Sasaki, T, 2022
)
0.94
"To investigate the efficacy of combined immunosuppressive regimens of cyclosporine (CsA), tacrolimus (TAC), or cyclophosphamide (CTX) combined with steroids in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN)."( Comparative efficacy of three regimens (cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and cyclophosphamide) combined with steroids for the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy.
Fang, X; Ruo-Ji, C; Wei-Yuan, L; Yu-Lin, Z; Zhen-Shuang, D; Zi-Li, Z,
)
0.6
"This case highlights the strong and important drug-drug interaction between tacrolimus and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir leading to toxic levels of tacrolimus."( Tacrolimus Drug-Drug Interaction with Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (Paxlovid™) Managed with Phenytoin.
Carroll, E; McCabe, D; Sindelar, M, 2023
)
2.58
"To review the drug-drug interactions between tacrolimus and lopinavir/ritonavir in 23 patients who received solid organ transplant during the first wave of COVID-19 and to determine the efficacy as well as safety of prednisone monotherapy."( Drug-drug interactions of ritonavir-boosted SARS-CoV-2 protease inhibitors in solid organ transplant recipients: experience from the initial use of lopinavir-ritonavir.
Ambrosioni, J; Arranz, N; Bodro, M; Brunet, M; Castel, MÁ; Cofan, F; Crespo, G; Diekmann, F; Farrero, M; Forner, A; Gonzalez-García, R; LLigoña, A; Marcos, MÁ; Miró, JM; Moreno, A; Rodríguez-García, M; Roma, JR; Ruiz, P; Soy, D; Tuset, M, 2023
)
1.17
"The magnitude of drug-drug interaction between tacrolimus and voriconazole is highly variable, and individually tailoring the tacrolimus dose when concomitantly administered with voriconazole remains difficult."( Individual dose recommendations for drug interaction between tacrolimus and voriconazole in adult liver transplant recipients: A semiphysiologically based population pharmacokinetic modeling approach.
Li, J; Li, RD; Li, ZR; Niu, WJ; Qiu, XY; Shen, CH; Wang, B; Wang, ZX; Zhang, LJ; Zhong, MK, 2023
)
1.41
" We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus and corticosteroid in combination with or without mycophenolate mofetil in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV)."( A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus and Corticosteroids in Combination With or Without Mycophenolate Mofetil in Liver Transplantation Recipients Infected With Hepatitis B Virus.
Choi, NG; Choi, ST; Chu, CW; Chung, YK; Ha, TY; Hwang, S; Jung, BH; Jung, DH; Kim, KK; Lee, SG; Moon, DB; Park, JI; Ryu, JH; Shin, MH; Song, GW; Yang, K; Yoon, YI, 2023
)
1.39
"The strategy of replacing a completely damaged spinal cord with allogenic adult spinal cord tissues (aSCs) can potentially repair complete spinal cord injury (SCI) in combination with immunosuppressive drugs, such as tacrolimus (Tac), which suppress transplant rejection and improve graft survival."( Adult spinal cord tissue transplantation combined with local tacrolimus sustained-release collagen hydrogel promotes complete spinal cord injury repair.
Dai, J; Gao, X; Gu, R; Shen, H; Wei, F; Xiao, Z; Zhao, X; Zhao, Y; Zhuang, Y, 2023
)
1.34

Bioavailability

Tacrolimus is characterized by a highly variable oral bioavailability. Poor precision may be due to reliance on routine drug monitoring data alone, difficulties with expression of covariates in continuous modeling relationships in the PKS program.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The kinetics of intravenously administered FK506 was not changed from control status two weeks after bile duct ligation, but the bioavailability of orally administered FK506 was nearly quadrupled."( The effect of bile duct ligation and bile diversion on FK506 pharmacokinetics in dogs.
Fung, J; Furukawa, H; Imventarza, O; Starzl, TE; Suzuki, M; Todo, S; Venkataramanan, R; Warty, VS; Zhu, Y, 1992
)
0.28
"1 L/hour, and bioavailability 14 +/- 12%."( Pharmacokinetics of FK506 after intravenous and oral administration in patients awaiting renal transplantation.
Arrazola, L; Barber, DL; Bowers, L; Canafax, DM; Gruber, SA; Hewitt, JM; Matas, AJ; Rosenberg, ME; Rynders, G; Sorenson, AL, 1994
)
0.29
" Bioavailability after oral administration is 5-67%, and the half-life is 4-41 hours."( Tacrolimus: a new immunosuppressive agent.
Burckart, GJ; Kelly, PA; Venkataramanan, R, 1995
)
1.73
"02 L/kg; clearance of 71 +/- 34 mL/h/kg; and bioavailability of 32 +/- 24%."( FK506 (Tacrolimus) monotherapy for prevention of graft-versus-host disease after histocompatible sibling allogenic bone marrow transplantation.
Antin, JH; Bierer, BE; Blazar, BR; Collins, RH; Fay, JW; Fitzsimmons, WE; Maher, RM; Piñeiro, LA; Przepiorka, D; Saral, R; Weisdorf, DJ; Wingard, JR, 1996
)
0.75
" It is concluded that tacrolimus is metabolized in the intestine, that the metabolites are able to re-enter the gut lumen and also enter into the portal vein and that small intestinal metabolism and transport is at least in part responsible for the low oral bioavailability of tacrolimus."( Metabolism of the macrolide immunosuppressant, tacrolimus, by the pig gut mucosa in the Ussing chamber.
Bader, A; Christians, U; Gonschior, AK; Hackbarth, I; Lampen, A; Sewing, KF; von Engelhardt, W, 1996
)
0.87
" The striking potency of these agents, their bioavailability and the dissociation of neurotrophic from immunosuppressant actions argue for their therapeutic relevance in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases."( Neurotrophic actions of nonimmunosuppressive analogues of immunosuppressive drugs FK506, rapamycin and cyclosporin A.
Connolly, MA; Dawson, TM; Hamilton, GS; Hester, L; Snyder, SH; Steiner, JP; Valentine, HL, 1997
)
0.3
" The bioavailability of mycophenolic acid, the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil, has been reported to be reduced by aluminium/magnesium hydroxide-containing antacids and cholestyramine."( Clinically significant drug interactions with new immunosuppressive agents.
Mignat, C, 1997
)
0.3
" Unlike standard oral cyclosporine, tacrolimus is well absorbed orally, even from diseased small bowel mucosa."( Preliminary report on the use of oral tacrolimus (FK506) in the treatment of complicated proximal small bowel and fistulizing Crohn's disease.
Sandborn, WJ, 1997
)
0.84
"29 mg/kg/day) is well absorbed in patients with Crohn's disease with proximal small bowel involvement or fistulae and appears to be of clinical benefit as a rapidly acting "bridge" to long-term therapy with methotrexate or 6-mercaptopurine."( Preliminary report on the use of oral tacrolimus (FK506) in the treatment of complicated proximal small bowel and fistulizing Crohn's disease.
Sandborn, WJ, 1997
)
0.57
"To quantitate the effect of ketoconazole, an azole antifungal agent and potent inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein, on the bioavailability of tacrolimus, a substrate of the CYP3A system and of P-glycoprotein."( Tacrolimus oral bioavailability doubles with coadministration of ketoconazole.
Bekersky, I; Benet, LZ; Dressler, D; Floren, LC; Hebert, MF; Lee, JW; Mekki, Q; Roberts, JP, 1997
)
1.94
"Because ketoconazole did not alter hepatic bioavailability and because 10 hours separated administration times of the drugs, it appears that the marked increase in tacrolimus bioavailability can be explained by ketoconazole having a local inhibitory effect on tacrolimus gut metabolism or on intestinal P-glycoprotein activity."( Tacrolimus oral bioavailability doubles with coadministration of ketoconazole.
Bekersky, I; Benet, LZ; Dressler, D; Floren, LC; Hebert, MF; Lee, JW; Mekki, Q; Roberts, JP, 1997
)
1.94
" Area-under-the-curve values were calculated for each drug to assess if there was a reciprocal effect on the respective bioavailability of each."( Unexpected augmentation of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in combination therapy, and analogous in vitro findings.
Burke, G; Ciancio, G; de Faria, L; Esquenazi, V; Miller, J; Rosen, A; Roth, D; Tsaroucha, A; Tzakis, A; Zucker, K, 1997
)
0.51
" bioavailability was 31-49%."( Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in BMT patients.
Antin, J; Bekersky, I; Boswell, GW; Fay, J; Fitzsimmons, W; Maher, R; Nash, R; Weisdorf, D; Wingard, J, 1998
)
1.74
" The bioavailability of L-732,531 in baboons was estimated at 3%, 9%, and 24% when animals were dosed at 5, 15, and 26 mg/kg po, respectively."( Disposition of L-732,531, a potent immunosuppressant, in rats and baboons.
Carey, KD; Chiu, SH; Colletti, A; Hawkins, T; Karanam, BV; Lavin, M; Miller, RR; Montgomery, T; Stearns, RA; Tang, YS; Vincent, SH, 1998
)
0.3
"Tacrolimus, an immunosuppressive agent, has poor and variable bioavailability following oral administration in clinical use."( Effects of intestinal and hepatic metabolism on the bioavailability of tacrolimus in rats.
Hashimoto, Y; Inui, K; Sasa, H; Shimomura, M, 1998
)
1.98
"The rate of absorption of tacrolimus in the intestine was rapid, and tacrolimus was almost completely absorbed after intestinal administration."( Effects of intestinal and hepatic metabolism on the bioavailability of tacrolimus in rats.
Hashimoto, Y; Inui, K; Sasa, H; Shimomura, M, 1998
)
0.83
" The mean bioavailability of oral tacrolimus was 25+/-20%."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (FK506) in paediatric liver transplant recipients.
Bernard, O; Clement De Clety, S; De Ville De Goyet, J; Firdaous, I; Furlan, V; Lykavieris, L; Möller, A; Otte, JB; Reding, R; Schäfer, A; Sokal, E; Stadler, P; Taburet, AM; Undre, NA; Van Leeuw, V; Wallemacq, PE,
)
0.73
"03) and decreased tacrolimus bioavailability (14."( Effects of rifampin on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.
Bekersky, I; Dressler, D; Fisher, RM; Hebert, MF; Marsh, CL, 1999
)
0.95
"01) than those in the T group, with a comparative bioavailability of 115."( Pharmacokinetic advantages of a newly developed tacrolimus oil-in-water-type emulsion via the enteral route.
Hashimoto, H; Kazui, T; Muhammad, BA; Suzuki, K; Suzuki, Y; Uno, T, 1999
)
0.56
" The oral bioavailability was about 20%."( The disposition of 14C-labeled tacrolimus after intravenous and oral administration in healthy human subjects.
Hata, T; Iwasaki, K; Kawamura, A; Möller, A; Schäfer, A; Shiraga, T; Teramura, Y; Undre, NA, 1999
)
0.59
"Most immunosuppresive drugs are absorbed from the intestine after oral administration, although there is some difference of bioavailability between ileum and jejunum."( Comparison of cyclosporin A and tacrolimus concentrations in whole blood between jejunal and ileal transplanted rats.
Fujimura, A; Kobayashi, E; Ogino, Y, 1999
)
0.59
" A previously conducted, randomized, 24-subject, crossover bioavailability study of 1 and 5 mg capsules (one period each) failed to demonstrate bioequivalence."( Bioequivalence of 1 and 5 mg tacrolimus capsules using a replicate study design.
Bekersky, I; Colburn, W; Dressler, D; Mekki, Q, 1999
)
0.59
" It has more consistent pharmacokinetic parameters and improved bioavailability when compared with conventional cyclosporine."( Conversion to neoral for neurotoxicity after primary adult liver transplantation under tacrolimus.
Brody, D; Fung, J; Hamad, I; Jain, A; Kanal, E; Rishi, N, 2000
)
0.53
" It is well absorbed from diseased bowel and preliminary experiences have indicated its short-term use in complicated Crohn's disease."( Oral tacrolimus (FK 506) in Crohn's disease complicated by fistulae of the perineum.
Amoruso, A; Francavilla, A; Francavilla, R; Ierardi, E; Ingrosso, M; Panella, C; Pisani, A; Principi, M; Rendina, M, 2000
)
0.82
" As CYP3A4 enzymes and P-gp are present at differing concentrations throughout the gastrointestinal tract, the bioavailability of tacrolimus may be influenced by changes in gastrointestinal transit time in addition to changes in hepatic metabolism."( Increased tacrolimus levels in a pediatric renal transplant patient attributed to chronic diarrhea.
Boineau, FG; Christensen, ML; Eades, SK, 2000
)
0.91
"To study the contribution of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) to the oral absorption of a substrate, tacrolimus, by comparing the extent and rate of bioavailability in normal and mdr1a knockout mice."( Apparent lack of effect of P-glycoprotein on the gastrointestinal absorption of a substrate, tacrolimus, in normal mice.
Chiou, WL; Chung, SM; Wu, TC, 2000
)
0.75
" Great similarity in the relative bioavailability profile (such as short Tmax) between normal and knockout mice was also found."( Apparent lack of effect of P-glycoprotein on the gastrointestinal absorption of a substrate, tacrolimus, in normal mice.
Chiou, WL; Chung, SM; Wu, TC, 2000
)
0.53
" Moreover, its bioavailability and pharmacokinetics are highly variable."( A peculiar vacuolization in the kidney transplant of a child treated with tacrolimus.
Chikamoto, H; Hattori, M; Horita, S; Ito, K; Matsumoto, N; Oonishi, M; Shiraga, H; Suzuki, T; Tanabe, K; Tokumoto, T; Toma, H; Watanabe, S; Yamaguchi, Y, 2000
)
0.54
" Population average parameter estimates of clearance (CL), volume of distribution (V) and oral bioavailability (F) were sought; a number of clinical and demographic variables were tested for their influence on these parameters."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Asian paediatric liver transplant patients.
Aw, M; Chan, SY; Charles, BG; Ho, PC; Lim, SM; Quak, SH; Sam, WJ, 2000
)
0.59
"The final optimal population models related clearance to age, volume of distribution to body surface area and bioavailability to body weight and total bilirubin concentration."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Asian paediatric liver transplant patients.
Aw, M; Chan, SY; Charles, BG; Ho, PC; Lim, SM; Quak, SH; Sam, WJ, 2000
)
0.59
" Absolute bioavailability was significantly lower (P = ."( The pharmacokinetics and metabolic disposition of tacrolimus: a comparison across ethnic groups.
Bekersky, I; Benet, LZ; Carrier, S; Christians, U; Dressler, D; Floren, LC; Frassetto, L; Mancinelli, LM, 2001
)
0.56
"The effects of renal failure on the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of tacrolimus were investigated in rats."( Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of tacrolimus in rats with experimental renal dysfunction.
Hashimoto, Y; Inui, KI; Okabe, H, 2000
)
0.8
" The introduction of the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine with its more consistent bioavailability has renewed interest in the use of alternative sampling strategies to the trough cyclosporine concentration."( New developments in the immunosuppressive drug monitoring of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and azathioprine.
Armstrong, VW; Oellerich, M, 2001
)
0.54
"We recently reported that of all hydrophilic cyclodextrin (CyD) derivatives examined, 2,6-di-O-methyl-beta-cyclodextrin (DM-beta-CyD) most significantly increased the aqueous solubility and the dissolution rate, resulting in the improvement of oral bioavailability of the immunosuppressive drug tacrolimus in rats."( Contribution of P-glycoprotein to the enhancing effects of dimethyl-beta-cyclodextrin on oral bioavailability of tacrolimus.
Arima, H; Hirayama, F; Uekama, K; Yunomae, K, 2001
)
0.7
"The enhancing effects of cyclodextrins (CyDs) on the solubility, the dissolution rate, and the bioavailability of tacrolimus after oral administration to rats were examined and compared with those after administration of a PROGRAF capsule containing the solid dispersion formulation of tacrolimus."( Comparative studies of the enhancing effects of cyclodextrins on the solubility and oral bioavailability of tacrolimus in rats.
Arima, H; Hirayama, F; Irie, T; Miyake, K; Uekama, K; Yunomae, K, 2001
)
0.73
" Because of presystemic elimination, the oral bioavailability is low (around 20%) but may vary between 4 and 89%."( Comparative clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in paediatric and adult patients.
Verbeeck, RK; Wallemacq, PE, 2001
)
0.58
"Tacrolimus, a substrate of CYP3A, has low and variable bioavailability similar to cyclosporine."( The effect of gut metabolism on tacrolimus bioavailability in renal transplant recipients.
Alloway, RR; Gaber, AO; Johnson, JA; Tuteja, S, 2001
)
2.04
" Based on this difference in first pass metabolism, an increase of 2% in bioavailability is expected, but an increase of 47% is observed (P=0."( The effect of gut metabolism on tacrolimus bioavailability in renal transplant recipients.
Alloway, RR; Gaber, AO; Johnson, JA; Tuteja, S, 2001
)
0.59
"5 hours, and absolute bioavailability = 22."( Comparative tacrolimus pharmacokinetics: normal versus mildly hepatically impaired subjects.
Alak, A; Bekersky, I; Boswell, GW; Dressler, D; Mekki, QA, 2001
)
0.69
" In conclusion, oral administration of tacrolimus may achieve the therapeutic level, even in the presence of jejunostomy after LTx, although the bioavailability is decreased."( Oral administration of tacrolimus in the presence of jejunostomy after liver transplantation.
Azuma, T; Hasegawa, T; Kimura, T; Nara, K; Okada, A; Sasaki, T; Soh, H, 2001
)
0.89
" There were significant differences between the preoperative and the postoperative state in the area under the curve, total body clearance and bioavailability for the oral administration."( Chrono and clinical pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in continuous intravenous administration.
Akao, T; Habuchi, T; Kato, T; Sato, K; Satoh, S; Shimoda, N; Suzuki, T; Tachiki, Y; Tada, H; Tsuchiya, N, 2001
)
0.57
" However, it is not easy to determine the optimal oral dose because of considerable variation of tacrolimus bioavailability between patients."( Effective oral administration of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients.
Kamoya, K; Kimikawa, M; Teraoka, S; Toma, H, 2001
)
0.81
" Interindividual variabilities in CL, volume of distribution (V), and bioavailability (F) were 57."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult recipients receiving living-donor liver transplantation.
Fukatsu, S; Hashida, T; Igarashi, T; Inui, K; Kiuchi, T; Saito, H; Takayanagi, K; Tanaka, K; Uemoto, S; Yano, I, 2001
)
0.6
"The effects of renal failure on the hepatic and intestinal extraction of tacrolimus were evaluated to examine the mechanisms for the increased bioavailability of this drug in cisplatin-induced renal failure model rats."( Evaluation of increased bioavailability of tacrolimus in rats with experimental renal dysfunction.
Hashimoto, Y; Inui, K; Okabe, H; Saito, H; Yano, I, 2002
)
0.81
" It is also possible that differences in P-gp function at various intestinal sites in a subject or at a given intestinal site in various subjects could lead to large intra- and interindividual variability in bioavailability of tacrolimus following oral administration."( Tacrolimus is a class II low-solubility high-permeability drug: the effect of P-glycoprotein efflux on regional permeability of tacrolimus in rats.
Amidon, GL; Ibuki, R; Ohike, A; Tamura, S; Yamashita, S, 2002
)
1.94
"The immunosuppressant tacrolimus shows poor and variable bioavailability following oral administration in clinical use."( Roles of the jejunum and ileum in the first-pass effect as absorptive barriers for orally administered tacrolimus.
Inui, K; Masuda, S; Saito, H; Sakamoto, S; Shimomura, M; Tanaka, K; Uemoto, S, 2002
)
0.84
" The bioavailability of tacrolimus in the jejunum- or ileum-resected rats was higher than that in sham-operated controls."( Roles of the jejunum and ileum in the first-pass effect as absorptive barriers for orally administered tacrolimus.
Inui, K; Masuda, S; Saito, H; Sakamoto, S; Shimomura, M; Tanaka, K; Uemoto, S, 2002
)
0.84
" Despite the lower bioavailability of OST when compared with TC, the rejection incidence was similar with both formulations (60% vs."( Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus oral suspension in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
Chardot, C; Evrard, V; Janssen, M; Otte, JB; Paul, K; Reding, R; Sokal, E; Wallemacq, P; Wilmotte, L, 2002
)
0.6
" This again results in reduced bioavailability of the drug, as compared with systemic use."( Topical noncorticosteroid immunomodulation in the treatment of atopic dermatitis.
Kyllönen, H; Reitamo, S; Remitz, A; Saarikko, J, 2002
)
0.31
" Oral bioavailability of tacrolimus can be increased by concomitant administration of inhibitors of either CYP3A or P-glycoprotein."( Drug interactions with tacrolimus.
van Gelder, T, 2002
)
0.93
"The bioavailability of structurally unrelated drugs is limited by active secretion via the multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) product P-glycoprotein (Pgp) from enterocyte into lumen as well as intestinal metabolism by cytochrome P450 IIIA4 (CYP3A4)."( C3435T polymorphism in the MDR1 gene affects the enterocyte expression level of CYP3A4 rather than Pgp in recipients of living-donor liver transplantation.
Goto, M; Inui, K; Kiuchi, T; Masuda, S; Saito, H; Tanaka, K; Uemoto, S, 2002
)
0.31
" In clinical studies, CYP3A/P-glycoprotein inhibitors and inducers primarily affect oral bioavailability of tacrolimus rather than its clearance, indicating a key role of intestinal P-glycoprotein and CYP3A."( Mechanisms of clinically relevant drug interactions associated with tacrolimus.
Benet, LZ; Christians, U; Jacobsen, W; Lampen, A, 2002
)
0.76
" Consequently, the bioavailability of FK506 was decreased by DEX treatment, and the total clearance was significantly increased by high-dose DEX treatment."( Lowered blood concentration of tacrolimus and its recovery with changes in expression of CYP3A and P-glycoprotein after high-dose steroid therapy.
Kaji, K; Kaneko, H; Kaneko, S; Kobayashi, K; Miyamoto, K; Nomura, M; Shimada, T; Terada, A; Yokogawa, K, 2002
)
0.6
" Poor precision may be due to reliance on routine drug monitoring data alone, difficulties with expression of covariates in continuous modeling relationships in the PKS program, lack of accurate quantitative measures of liver function, or large, random intraindividual variability in the bioavailability of tacrolimus."( Bayesian forecasting and prediction of tacrolimus concentrations in pediatric liver and adult renal transplant recipients.
Staatz, CE; Tett, SE; Willis, C, 2003
)
0.76
" Oral bioavailability of tacrolimus, which is variable between patients, averages approximately 25%."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus-based combination therapies.
Undre, NA, 2003
)
0.95
" Ketoconazole increases tacrolimus bioavailability by inhibiting cytochrome P450 3A4 and glycoprotein-p."( Coadministration of tacrolimus and ketoconazole in renal transplant recipients: cost analysis and review of metabolic effects.
Carbajal, H; Rodríguez-Montalvo, C; Soltero, L; Valdés, A, 2003
)
0.95
" Further prospective dose-controlled studies are necessary to investigate a possible effect of a standard-dose tacrolimus on long-term sirolimus bioavailability and/or metabolism."( Long-term pharmacokinetic study of the novel combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus in de novo renal allograft recipients.
Claes, K; Evenepoel, P; Kuypers, DR; Maes, B; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2003
)
0.77
" The better bioavailability of the new formulation of CsA (Neoral), implies that the former dosage recommendations be reconsidered for distinctly lower figures."( Treatment of idiopathic nephrosis by immunophillin modulation.
Meyrier, A, 2003
)
0.32
" The low oral bioavailability of calcineurin inhibitors is thought to result from the actions of the metabolizing enzymes cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and CYP3A5 and the multidrug efflux pump P-glycoprotein, encoded by MDR-1."( Genetic polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and MDR-1 genes and pharmacokinetics of the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus.
Gregoor, PJ; Hesselink, DA; Lindemans, J; van der Heiden, IP; van der Werf, M; van Gelder, T; van Schaik, RH; Weimar, W, 2003
)
0.52
" These results suggest that hepatic failure after LDLT, including chronic rejection and/or cholangitis, was accompanied by upregulation of intestinal PGP expression, which could depress the bioavailability of the immunosuppressant."( Enhanced expression of enterocyte P-glycoprotein depresses cyclosporine bioavailability in a recipient of living donor liver transplantation.
Goto, M; Inui, K; Kiuchi, T; Kodawara, T; Masuda, S; Saito, H; Tanaka, K; Uemoto, S, 2003
)
0.32
" The in vivo oral absorption study in dogs showed that bioavailability of tacrolimus from SDF with HPMC was remarkably improved compared with the crystalline powder."( Establishment of new preparation method for solid dispersion formulation of tacrolimus.
Higaki, K; Ibuki, R; Kimura, T; Nakate, T; Ohike, A; Okimoto, K; Tokunaga, Y; Yamashita, K, 2003
)
0.78
" Potential pharmacokinetic advantages of the SL route of delivery include good permeability, rapid absorption, acceptable bioavailability and easy accessibility."( Sublingual tacrolimus for immunosuppression in lung transplantation: a potentially important therapeutic option in cystic fibrosis.
Palmer, SM; Reams, BD, 2002
)
0.7
"There were no notable differences in group demographics, but a somewhat less favorable course occurred in group C, despite higher bioavailability of sirolimus in group C versus group A (P<0."( A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year.
Burke, GW; Ciancio, G; Gaynor, JJ; Kupin, W; Mattiazzi, A; Miller, J; Nicolas, M; Rosen, A; Roth, D; Ruiz, P, 2004
)
0.61
" If tacrolimus may be absorbed in the colon, direct administration of drug into this organ might be useful to augment bioavailability since the expression of CYP3A4 is low at this site."( The colon displays an absorptive capacity of tacrolimus.
Amae, S; Hayashi, Y; Ishii, T; Nio, M; Nishi, K; Sano, N; Wada, M, 2004
)
1.14
" The validated method has been successfully used to analyze human plasma samples for application in comparative bioavailability studies."( Liquid chromatography-negative ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of tacrolimus in human plasma and its bioanalytical applications.
Chidambara, J; Gopinadh, B; Koteshwara, M; Manoj, S; Puran, S; Ramakrishna, NV; Santosh, M; Sumatha, B; Vishwottam, KN; Wishu, S, 2004
)
0.54
" Model-independent pharmacokinetic parameters for tacrolimus were calculated and dose-corrected when appropriate: AUC12, peak plasma concentration (Cmax), pre-dose trough concentration (C0), time to Cmax, average steady-state blood concentration, steady-state total body clearance, terminal half-life, volume of distribution and an estimate for tacrolimus bioavailability was derived from additional steady-state intravenous clearance data."( Time-related clinical determinants of long-term tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in combination therapy with mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids: a prospective study in one hundred de novo renal transplant recipients.
Claes, K; Coosemans, W; Evenepoel, P; Kuypers, DR; Maes, B; Pirenne, J; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2004
)
0.83
"The oral bioavailability of tacrolimus is low and varies considerably in humans due to first-pass metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and the active efflux mediated by P-glycoprotein."( Increased bioavailability of tacrolimus after rectal administration in rats.
Hobara, N; Hokama, N; Kameya, H; Ohshiro, S; Saitoh, H; Sakai, M; Sakanashi, M, 2004
)
0.91
"Tacrolimus is characterized by a highly variable oral bioavailability and narrow therapeutic window."( The rate of gastric emptying determines the timing but not the extent of oral tacrolimus absorption: simultaneous measurement of drug exposure and gastric emptying by carbon-14-octanoic acid breath test in stable renal allograft recipients.
Claes, K; Evenepoel, P; Kuypers, DR; Maes, B; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2004
)
1.99
" Tacrolimus shows large variability in bioavailability after oral administration, both due to intestinal metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) and active secretion from enterocyte into intestinal lumen by P-glycoprotein."( Increased tacrolimus trough levels in association with severe diarrhea, a case report.
Asano, T; Hayakawa, M; Nishimoto, K, 2004
)
1.64
" Cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus, however, have all been described to exhibit ethnicity-specific differences in bioavailability and/or dose-adjusted systemic exposure, although currently available reports are controversial for some of these drugs."( Pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressants: a perspective on ethnic differences.
Dirks, NL; Huth, B; Meibohm, B; Yates, CR, 2004
)
0.68
" At 24 h after reperfusion, the ileum P-glycoprotein level was transiently increased to two-fold, and the absorption rate of dihydro-[(3)H]FK506 from in situ ileum loop into portal vein was markedly low in comparison with the control."( Transient up-regulation of P-glycoprotein reduces tacrolimus absorption after ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat ileum.
Goto, M; Inui, K; Ito, K; Masuda, S; Okuda, M; Omae, T; Shimomura, M, 2005
)
0.58
"Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and P-glycoprotein (PGP) are important determinants of the oral bioavailability and clearance of tacrolimus."( Impact of gastric acid suppressants on cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein: consequences for FK506 assimilation.
Lemahieu, WP; Maes, BD; Vanrenterghem, Y; Verbeke, K, 2005
)
0.53
"Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window, and bioavailability is known to vary considerably between renal transplant recipients."( AUC-guided dosing of tacrolimus prevents progressive systemic overexposure in renal transplant recipients.
Cremers, SC; de Fijter, JW; den Hartigh, J; Paul, LC; Rowshani, AT; Schoemaker, RC; Scholten, EM; van Kan, EJ, 2005
)
2.09
" These data strongly suggest that persistent diarrhea is associated with an increased oral bioavailability of Tac."( Cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein activity and assimilation of tacrolimus in transplant patients with persistent diarrhea.
Geboes, K; Lemahieu, W; Maes, B; Rutgeerts, P; Vanrenterghem, Y; Verbeke, K, 2005
)
0.56
" We found that NEO and TAC administrations in the evening resulted in reduced bioavailability and delayed absorption when compared with drug administrations in the morning."( Pharmacokinetic differences between morning and evening administration of cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy.
Abudoshukur, M; Ashizawa, T; Hama, K; Hirano, T; Iwahori, T; Johjima, Y; Konno, O; Matsuno, N; Nagao, T; Nakamura, Y; Oka, K; Okuyama, K; Takeuchi, H; Uchiyama, M, 2005
)
0.55
"The purpose of this pharmacokinetic study was to determine whether the relative oral bioavailability of tacrolimus is increased with concomitant administration of clotrimazole."( Concomitant clotrimazole therapy more than doubles the relative oral bioavailability of tacrolimus.
Benedetti, E; Shin, GP; Sifontis, N; Vasquez, EM, 2005
)
0.77
" It has yet to be seen whether the increased bioavailability of Neoral will result in an increased severity and prevalence of gingival overgrowth."( Cyclosporin-induced gingival overgrowth in children.
Hosey, MT; Welbury, RR; Wright, G, 2005
)
0.33
", irinotecan), resulting in increased bioavailability and reduced clearance of these agents."( Cyclosporin A, tacrolimus and sirolimus are potent inhibitors of the human breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) and reverse resistance to mitoxantrone and topotecan.
Dai, Y; Gupta, A; Hebert, MF; Mao, Q; Ross, DD; Thummel, KE; Unadkat, JD; Vethanayagam, RR, 2006
)
0.69
" Lower trough concentrations and bioavailability have been reported with oral MMF in first week after LTx."( Intravenous mycophenolate mofetil with low-dose oral tacrolimus and steroid induction for live donor liver transplantation.
Abt, P; Bozorgzadeh, A; Burlee, K; Jain, A; Kashyap, R; Kelley, M; Mohanka, R; Orloff, M, 2005
)
0.58
"The significance of intestinal P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in determining the oral bioavailability of tacrolimus has been still controversial."( Limited interaction between tacrolimus and P-glycoprotein in the rat small intestine.
Achiwa, K; Aungst, BJ; Kobayashi, M; Oda, M; Saikachi, Y; Saitoh, H; Tadano, K; Takahashi, Y; Yamaguchi, M; Yuhki, Y, 2006
)
0.85
" Bioavailability of enterally administered tacrolimus is poor, and further reduced by gastric residuals or by enteral nutrition."( Buccal vs. nasogastric tube administration of tacrolimus after pediatric liver transplantation.
Albers, MJ; Goorhuis, JF; Peeters, PM; Scheenstra, R, 2006
)
0.85
"An extemporaneous suspension of tacrolimus for paediatric use has recently been developed but poor bioavailability and erratic plasma concentrations were observed during clinical use."( Physical and microbiological stability of an extemporaneous tacrolimus suspension for paediatric use.
Beeton, A; Han, J; Long, PF; Tuleu, C; Wong, I, 2006
)
0.86
" The intestinal efflux-pump P-glycoprotein (Pgp) (multidrug resistance 1 [MDR1], ATP-binding cassette B1 [ABCB1]) and CYP3A4 have been demonstrated as important for the bioavailability of drugs, so called "absorptive barriers"."( An up-date review on individualized dosage adjustment of calcineurin inhibitors in organ transplant patients.
Inui, K; Masuda, S, 2006
)
0.33
" The activities of CYP3A5 and P-gp have been shown to influence bioavailability of several drugs."( Multidrug resistance gene-1 (MDR-1) haplotypes have a minor influence on tacrolimus dose requirements.
Carter, ND; Fredericks, S; Goldberg, L; Holt, DW; MacPhee, IA; Moreton, M; Reboux, S, 2006
)
0.57
" Correspondingly, the oral bioavailability, which was the after/ before fluconazole combination ratio of AUC0-12/dose and absorption rate (Cmax/dose/body weight), was significantly increased [2."( Pharmacokinetic study of the combination of tacrolimus and fluconazole in renal transplant patients.
Bunnachak, D; Jittikanont, S; Kanchanarattanakorn, K; Lumlertgul, D; Manoyot, A; Noppakun, K; Ophascharoensuk, V; Rojanasthien, N, 2006
)
0.59
"The bioavailability and metabolism of cyclosporine and tacrolimus are primarily controlled by efflux pumps and members of the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isoenzyme system found in the liver and gastrointestinal tract."( Effects of genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of calcineurin inhibitors.
Hiles, JJ; Kolesar, J; Utecht, KN, 2006
)
0.58
"We investigated the effects of the orally bioavailable non-immunosuppressive immunophilin ligand GPI 1046 (GPI) on erectile function and cavernous nerve (CN) histology following unilateral or bilateral crush injury (UCI, BCI, respectively) of the CNs."( Neuroimmunophilin ligands protect cavernous nerves after crush injury in the rat: new experimental paradigms.
Burnett, AL; Chen, Y; Guo, H; Hoke, A; McCormick, J; Sezen, SF; Steiner, JP; Valentine, H; Wu, Y, 2007
)
0.34
" The bioavailability of the 2 formulations was evaluated based on the requirement of 20% deviation at a power of 80%."( A randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover bioavailability study of two oral formulations of tacrolimus in healthy Korean adults.
Kim, KH; Kim, YS; Kwon, KI; Lee, YJ; Park, K; Park, MS, 2007
)
0.56
" The oral bioavailability of tacrolimus was poor and ranged from 11."( Population pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients.
Antignac, M; Barrou, B; Farinotti, R; Lechat, P; Urien, S, 2007
)
0.88
"SchE can increase the oral bioavailability of tacrolimus."( Effects of Schisandra sphenanthera extract on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in healthy volunteers.
Li, Q; Shen, Y; Su, D; Wu, XC; Xin, HW; Xiong, L; Yu, AR; Zhu, M, 2007
)
0.83
" Patients treated with cyclosporine as initial immunosuppression who fail to reach target C(2) levels in a timely fashion are at risk for impaired bioavailability of tacrolimus."( Apparent low absorbers of cyclosporine microemulsion have higher requirements for tacrolimus in renal transplantation.
Boudville, N; Denesyk, K; Elmestiri, M; House, AA; Jevnikar, AM; Luke, PP; Muirhead, N; Rehman, F,
)
0.55
" Human oral bioavailability is an important pharmacokinetic property, which is directly related to the amount of drug available in the systemic circulation to exert pharmacological and therapeutic effects."( Hologram QSAR model for the prediction of human oral bioavailability.
Andricopulo, AD; Moda, TL; Montanari, CA, 2007
)
0.34
" The more predictable oral bioavailability and better side-effect profile makes tacrolimus a more favourable choice as compared with ciclosporin."( The use of tacrolimus in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.
Chow, DK; Leong, RW, 2007
)
0.96
"The immunosuppressant drug tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index and is subject to a large variation in individual bioavailability and clearance."( Cloned enzyme donor immunoassay tacrolimus assay compared with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and microparticle enzyme immunoassay in liver and renal transplant recipients.
Morris, RG; Salm, P; Taylor, PJ; Westley, IS, 2007
)
0.92
" The low CsA and Tac bioavailability has been attributed to interindividual differences in the expression of the metabolizing enzyme cytochrome P450 3A."( [Cytochrome P450 3A polymorphism and its importance in cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy in transplanted patients].
Duricová, J; Grundmann, M, 2007
)
0.57
" The aim of this trial was to analyze Tac bioavailability after partial liver transplantation."( Oral tacrolimus bioavailability is increased after right split liver transplantation.
Bärthel, E; Koch, A; Kornberg, A; Küpper, B; Settmacher, U; Thrum, K; Wilberg, J, 2007
)
0.85
"Peroral Tac bioavailability was significantly higher after partial liver transplantation using the right hepatic lobe compared with full-size transplants."( Oral tacrolimus bioavailability is increased after right split liver transplantation.
Bärthel, E; Koch, A; Kornberg, A; Küpper, B; Settmacher, U; Thrum, K; Wilberg, J, 2007
)
0.85
" Bioavailability of enterally administered tacrolimus is poor, and further reduced by gastrointestinal failure or enteral nutrition."( Sublingual administration of tacrolimus in a renal transplant patient.
Borobia, A; Carcas, A; Escuin, F; Fudio, S; Gil, F; Jiménez, C; Ramirez, E; Romero, I, 2008
)
0.9
" Because of a possible limited bioavailability of FK506, long-term inhibition of neointimal formation was not sustained at the considered follow-up."( Short-, mid-, and long-term effects of a polymer-free tacrolimus-eluting stent in a porcine coronary model.
Black, A; Gaggianesi, S; Galloni, M; Lolli, V; Prunotto, M; Santarelli, A; Vignolini, C, 2009
)
0.6
"This study proposes a new concept of double coated nanocapsules to improve the oral bioavailability of a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate drug, tacrolimus, without modulating the physiological activity of the P-gp pump."( Novel double coated nanocapsules for intestinal delivery and enhanced oral bioavailability of tacrolimus, a P-gp substrate drug.
Benita, S; Nassar, T; Nyska, A; Rom, A, 2009
)
0.77
" Its oral bioavailability varies greatly between individuals, and it is a substrate of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and P-glycoprotein."( Influence of CYP3A5 genetic polymorphism on tacrolimus daily dose requirements and acute rejection in renal graft recipients.
Becquemont, L; Charpentier, B; Durrbach, A; Ferlicot, S; Furlan, V; Letierce, A; Quteineh, L; Taburet, AM; Verstuyft, C, 2008
)
0.61
" The bioavailability of CsA and FK506 seems to be associated with the cytocrhome P450 IIIA (CYP3A) gene."( Genetic polymorphisms in CYP3A5 and MDR1 genes and their correlations with plasma levels of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients.
Breitenfeld, L; Martinho, A; Mendes, J; Mota, A; Pais, L; Simoes, O, 2009
)
0.57
"Cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and the drug transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) affect the bioavailability of tacrolimus, the most commonly used immunosuppressive agent in organ transplant recipients."( Tacrolimus concentrations in relation to CYP3A and ABCB1 polymorphisms among solid organ transplant recipients in Korea.
Cho, DY; Chun, S; Han, DJ; Jang, MS; Jun, KR; Kang, C; Kim, JQ; Lee, SG; Lee, W; Min, WK; Park, KT; Song, GW, 2009
)
2.01
" In comparison to systemic tacrolimus used for prevention and treatment of rejection after organ transplantation, the bioavailability of topical tacrolimus in patients with atopic dermatitis is between 3 and 4%."( Long-term safety of tacrolimus ointment in atopic dermatitis.
Reitamo, S; Remitz, A, 2009
)
0.97
" These results suggest that oral solution itraconazole significantly interacts with calcineurin inhibitors with a wide interindividual variability in allogeneic HSCT recipients, which could partly be explained by the variable bioavailability of oral solution itraconazole."( Drug interaction between oral solution itraconazole and calcineurin inhibitors in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: an association with bioavailability of oral solution itraconazole.
Aisa, Y; Ikeda, Y; Kato, J; Mori, T; Nakamura, Y; Okamoto, S, 2009
)
0.35
"71 L/kg, and typical bioavailability was 15."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: new initial dosage suggestions and a model-based dosage adjustment tool.
Fasth, A; Friberg, LE; Staatz, CE; Wallin, JE, 2009
)
0.64
"In the setting of a controlled clinical study, the co-administration of GFJ with FK506 increased the bioavailability of FK506."( Co-administration of grapefruit juice increases bioavailability of tacrolimus in liver transplant patients: a prospective study.
Liu, C; Liu, XM; Lv, Y; Ma, F; Shang, YF; Wang, B; Wu, Z; Yu, L; Zhang, XF; Zhang, XG, 2009
)
0.59
" The following covariates were retained in the final model: time of drug administration on the absorption rate constant and CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genotypes on the TAC apparent clearance."( Time of drug administration, CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genotypes, and analytical method influence tacrolimus pharmacokinetics: a population pharmacokinetic study.
Delattre, IK; Haufroid, V; Mourad, M; Musuamba, FT; Verbeeck, RK; Wallemacq, P, 2009
)
0.57
"Oral bioavailability (F) is a product of fraction absorbed (Fa), fraction escaping gut-wall elimination (Fg), and fraction escaping hepatic elimination (Fh)."( Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
Chang, G; El-Kattan, A; Miller, HR; Obach, RS; Rotter, C; Steyn, SJ; Troutman, MD; Varma, MV, 2010
)
0.36
" Due to the number of patients required to achieve sufficient statistical power, to test the therapeutic equivalence of two formulations of the same drug with the same bioavailability is an unrealistic goal."( Bioequivalence testing of immunosuppressants: concepts and misconceptions.
Christians, U; Clavijo, CF; Klawitter, J, 2010
)
0.36
"We conclude that in adult renal transplant recipients, EVL significantly decreases TAC oral bioavailability in a dose-dependent manner."( Interaction between everolimus and tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients: a pharmacokinetic controlled trial.
Brunet, M; Cabello, M; del Castillo, D; Fernández, AM; Grinyó, JM; Pallardó, L; Pascual, J, 2010
)
0.64
" However, the microvasculature distal to PES showed a decreased NO bioavailability at five days, which improved at 28 days."( Endothelial function rather than endothelial restoration is altered in paclitaxel- as compared to bare metal-, sirolimusand tacrolimus-eluting stents.
Danser, AH; Duncker, DJ; Onuma, Y; Sorop, O; van Beusekom, HM; van den Heuvel, M; van der Giessen, WJ, 2010
)
0.57
" Tacrolimus pharmacokinetic variability is based on bioavailability and systemic clearance, which are represented by apparent oral clearance."( A systematic review of the effect of CYP3A5 genotype on the apparent oral clearance of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients.
Barry, A; Levine, M, 2010
)
1.49
" A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model estimating oral clearance, between-patient variability in oral clearance, central volume of distribution, and residual variability in combination with historical estimates of first-order absorption rate constant, intercompartmental clearance, and peripheral volume of distribution adequately described the sparse MPA data."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis of mycophenolic acid coadministered with either tasocitinib (CP-690,550) or tacrolimus in adult renal allograft recipients.
Busque, S; Chan, G; Krishnaswami, S; Lamba, M; Melcher, M; Tafti, B, 2010
)
0.57
" Bioavailability decreased with increasing MMF doses."( Nonlinear relationship between mycophenolate mofetil dose and mycophenolic acid exposure: implications for therapeutic drug monitoring.
de Winter, BC; Mathot, RA; Sombogaard, F; van Gelder, T; Vulto, AG, 2011
)
0.37
" In Advagraf patients, a bimodal distribution was observed for the absorption rate constant (K(tr) ): one group with a K(tr) similar to that of Prograf treated patients and the other group with a slower absorption."( Population pharmacokinetic model and Bayesian estimator for two tacrolimus formulations--twice daily Prograf and once daily Advagraf.
de Winter, BC; Kamar, N; Marquet, P; Rostaing, L; Rousseau, A; Woillard, JB, 2011
)
0.61
"Low solubility of tacrolimus in carrier matrix and subsequent poor in vivo bioavailability was overcome by constructing modified nanolipid carrier (MNLC) as a novel approach."( Development and evaluation of colloidal modified nanolipid carrier: application to topical delivery of tacrolimus.
Pople, PV; Singh, KK, 2011
)
0.92
"A new self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) has been developed to increase the solubility, dissolution rate and oral bioavailability of tacrolimus (TAC)."( Enhanced oral bioavailability of tacrolimus in rats by self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems.
He, F; He, Z; Liu, H; Sun, J; Wang, Y; Zhang, T, 2011
)
0.85
" Those drugs have low and variable oral bioavailability that is increased when combined with cyclosporine or tacrolimus (TAC)."( Sirolimus and everolimus intestinal absorption and interaction with calcineurin inhibitors: a differential effect between cyclosporine and tacrolimus.
Boussera, B; Lamoureux, F; Marquet, P; Picard, N; Sauvage, FL, 2012
)
0.79
" Unfortunately, both drugs are characterised by high pharmacokinetic variability, poor bioavailability and high toxicity."( Immunophilin-loaded erythrocytes as a new delivery strategy for immunosuppressive drugs.
Biagiotti, S; Bianchi, M; Conaldi, PG; Giacomini, E; Magnani, M; Pierigè, F; Rossi, L; Serafini, G, 2011
)
0.37
" The European regulatory authorities require comparative bioavailability studies with an innovator product to grant marketing authorization of generic products."( Bioequivalence of two tacrolimus formulations under fasting conditions in healthy male subjects.
Kale, P; Mandal, J; Mathew, P; Patel, K; Patel, R; Soni, K; Tangudu, G, 2011
)
0.68
"By delivering immunomodulatory drugs in vivo directly to lymph nodes draining an injection site, an opportunity exists to increase drug bioavailability to local immune cells."( Nano-sized drug-loaded micelles deliver payload to lymph node immune cells and prolong allograft survival.
Dane, KY; Eby, JK; Hubbell, JA; Inverardi, L; Nembrini, C; O'Neil, CP; Swartz, MA; Tomei, AA; Velluto, D, 2011
)
0.37
" This study investigated the effects of co-administering CGP on the bioavailability of cyclosporine and tacrolimus."( Citrus grandis peel increases the bioavailability of cyclosporine and tacrolimus, two important immunosuppressants, in rats.
Chao, PD; Hou, YC; Lin, SP; Tsai, SY; Wang, MJ, 2011
)
0.82
"Data were obtained from a comparative bioavailability study of oral TAC formulations (n = 22)."( Association of ABCB1, CYP3A4*18B and CYP3A5*3 genotypes with the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in healthy Chinese subjects: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.
Cui, XY; Geng, F; Jiao, Z; Qiu, XY; Shi, XJ; Zhong, MK, 2011
)
0.59
" Oral bioavailability of the tablets was examined in fasted beagle dogs."( Novel gastroretentive sustained-release tablet of tacrolimus based on self-microemulsifying mixture: in vitro evaluation and in vivo bioavailability test.
Gan, Y; Wang, YP; Zhang, XX, 2011
)
0.62
" Compared with the commercially available capsules of tacrolimus, the relative bioavailability of the SME gastroretentive sustained-release tablets was 553."( Novel gastroretentive sustained-release tablet of tacrolimus based on self-microemulsifying mixture: in vitro evaluation and in vivo bioavailability test.
Gan, Y; Wang, YP; Zhang, XX, 2011
)
0.87
"SME gastroretentive sustained-release tablets can enhance the oral bioavailability of tacrolimus with poor solubility and a narrow absorption window."( Novel gastroretentive sustained-release tablet of tacrolimus based on self-microemulsifying mixture: in vitro evaluation and in vivo bioavailability test.
Gan, Y; Wang, YP; Zhang, XX, 2011
)
0.85
" Although promiscuity of four drugs can be explained under the bioavailability model, the promiscuity of Tacrolimus and Pentamidine was completely unexpected."( Systematic exploration of synergistic drug pairs.
Andrews, BJ; Baryshnikova, A; Boone, C; Chua, HN; Cokol, M; Costanzo, M; Giaever, G; Mutlu, B; Myers, CL; Nergiz, ME; Nislow, C; Roth, FP; Suzuki, Y; Tasan, M; Weinstein, ZB, 2011
)
0.58
" The typical population values of tacrolimus for the pharmacokinetic parameters of apparent clearance (CL/F), apparent distribution volume of the central compartment (V(2)/F), intercompartmental clearance (Q/F), apparent distribution volume of the peripheral compartment (V(3)/F), absorption rate (ka) and lag time (ALAG) were 27."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Ma, S; Miao, LY; Rui, JZ; Xue, L; Zhang, H, 2011
)
0.9
" The data were analyzed by nonlinear mixed effect modelling, using a one compartment model with first order absorption and first order elimination and random effects on the absorption rate (k(a)), the apparent volume of distribution (V/F) and apparent clearance (CL/F)."( Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and dose optimization with limited sampling strategy in liver transplant children.
Barau, C; Barrail-Tran, A; Debray, D; Furlan, V; Taburet, AM, 2012
)
0.38
" The relative bioavailability in patients with CF was approximately 60% of the relative bioavailability observed in patients without CF, and the transfer rate constant between the transit compartments was 2-fold smaller in patients with CF than in those without CF (3."( Population pharmacokinetic modelling and design of a Bayesian estimator for therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus in lung transplantation.
de Winter, BC; Estenne, M; Guillemain, R; Kessler, R; Knoop, C; Marquet, P; Monchaud, C; Pison, C; Reynaud-Gaubert, M; Rousseau, A; Stern, M, 2012
)
0.59
"Population pharmacokinetic analysis showed that lung transplant patients with CF displayed lower bioavailability and a smaller transfer rate constant between transit compartments than those without CF, while the apparent clearance was faster in CYP3A5 expressers than in non-expressers."( Population pharmacokinetic modelling and design of a Bayesian estimator for therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus in lung transplantation.
de Winter, BC; Estenne, M; Guillemain, R; Kessler, R; Knoop, C; Marquet, P; Monchaud, C; Pison, C; Reynaud-Gaubert, M; Rousseau, A; Stern, M, 2012
)
0.59
" The thermal studies (DSC, DSC-Photovisual, DTA and TG-dynamical) were applied in the thermal characterization of the raw materials of tacrolimus which showed pseudo-polymorphic forms, which must be monitored by pharmaceutical industry, avoiding future problems in pharmaceutical process, chemical stability and bioavailability of the tacrolimus product."( Correlation of thermal analysis and pyrolysis coupled to GC-MS in the characterization of tacrolimus.
Böer, TM; Macêdo, RO; Nascimento, TG; Procópio, JV, 2013
)
0.81
" The oral bioavailability of tacrolimus averages 20% to 25%; however, the inter-individual variability in this parameter is large."( Relationship among changes in hematocrit, albumin and corticosteroid dose on the disposition of tacrolimus during the first six months following renal transplantation.
Domínguez-Ramírez, A; Fuentes-Noriega, I; González-López, EH; Mancilla-Urrea, E; Robles-Piedras, AL; Romano-Moreno, S, 2011
)
0.88
" These results indicate that oral voriconazole has a significant drug interaction with oral tacrolimus with a wide inter-individual variability, which cannot be explained by the bioavailability of voriconazole."( Drug interaction between voriconazole and tacrolimus and its association with the bioavailability of oral voriconazole in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Kato, J; Kikuchi, T; Kohashi, S; Mori, T; Okamoto, S; Ono, Y; Sakurai, M; Yamane, A, 2012
)
0.86
"Variability in CYP3A5 expression associated with differences in tacrolimus bioavailability has been documented."( CYP3A5 polymorphism in Mexican renal transplant recipients and its association with tacrolimus dosing.
Alberú, J; Castañeda-Hernández, G; Elizondo, G; García-Roca, P; Mancilla Urrea, E; Medeiros, M; Morales-Buenrostro, LE; Ortiz, L; Reyes, H; Rodríguez-Espino, BA; Vásquez-Perdomo, M, 2012
)
0.84
" We observed an increase in the Dose-Normalized Trough Concentration (DNTC) values when tacrolimus was administered for 4 consecutive days by jejunostomy as compared to oral administration, indicating that the relative bioavailability of tacrolimus increased."( Tacrolimus trough levels before, during and after jejunostomy in a liver transplant patient: a case report.
Charpiat, B; Ducerf, C; Duperret, S; Gazon, M; Mabrut, JY; Mezoughi, S; Preuss, J; Tod, M, 2012
)
2.04
" This study sought to compare the bioavailability and blood trough concentrations of orally and sublingually administered tacrolimus in adult liver transplant recipients by considering intraindividual variations in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics properties."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of oral versus sublingual administration of tacrolimus in adult liver transplant recipients.
Abdollahi, A; Dashti-Khavidaki, S; Irajian, H; Jafarian, A; Khalili, H; Nasiri-Toosi, M; Nasiri-Toosi, Z; Sadrai, S, 2012
)
0.82
" Our study confirmed the high variability of posaconazole bioavailability and showed the significant influence of gastrointestinal disorders, food intake, and concomitant medication on the PPCs."( Therapeutic drug monitoring of posaconazole in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.
Ameye, L; Aoun, M; Bourguignon, AM; Bron, D; Cotton, F; Csergö, M; Hites, M; Jacobs, F; Rasson, C; Vaes, M, 2012
)
0.38
" The oral bioavailability of tacrolimus varies greatly between individuals and depends largely on the activity of both the cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) subfamily and P-glycoprotein (P-gp)."( Influence of CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and MDR-1 polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and early renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients.
Cai, B; Li, Y; Shi, Y; Tang, J; Wang, L; Zhang, J; Zou, Y, 2013
)
0.93
"The objective of the study was to investigate the relative bioavailability between the generic tacrolimus products that are presently authorized in Spain by adjusted indirect comparison."( Bioequivalence between generic tacrolimus products marketed in Spain by adjusted indirect comparison.
Alvarez, C; Blázquez-Pérez, A; Corredera-Hernández, MT; de la Torre-Alvarado, JM; García-Arieta, A; Herranz, M; Morales-Alcelay, S; Suárez-Gea, ML, 2013
)
0.89
"Data from independent bioequivalence studies that compare each generic product with the reference product were combined by adjusted indirect comparisons to investigate the relative bioavailability between generic drug products, since there is no direct bioequivalence study comparing generics to each other."( Bioequivalence between generic tacrolimus products marketed in Spain by adjusted indirect comparison.
Alvarez, C; Blázquez-Pérez, A; Corredera-Hernández, MT; de la Torre-Alvarado, JM; García-Arieta, A; Herranz, M; Morales-Alcelay, S; Suárez-Gea, ML, 2013
)
0.68
" We examined tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in the peri-operative period and determined the association between the tacrolimus absorption rate and body weight reduction."( Excess fluid distribution affects tacrolimus absorption in peritoneal dialysis patients.
Banno, K; Fukuoka, N; Hara, T; Inui, M; Kakehi, Y; Kiyomoto, H; Kohno, M; Moriwaki, K; Nishiyama, A; Sofue, T; Yamaguchi, K, 2013
)
1.04
"The tacrolimus absorption rate on the day before kidney transplantation tended to be lower in PD patients than in HD patients; however, the rate improved after kidney transplantation and was similar in both groups of patients."( Excess fluid distribution affects tacrolimus absorption in peritoneal dialysis patients.
Banno, K; Fukuoka, N; Hara, T; Inui, M; Kakehi, Y; Kiyomoto, H; Kohno, M; Moriwaki, K; Nishiyama, A; Sofue, T; Yamaguchi, K, 2013
)
1.23
" CYP3A5 genotype has a significant influence on the oral bioavailability of tacrolimus and is a potential influence on variability of exposure."( CYP3A5 genotype had no impact on intrapatient variability of tacrolimus clearance in renal transplant recipients.
Holt, DW; MacPhee, IA; Spierings, N, 2013
)
0.86
" Phase 1 studies demonstrated greater bioavailability to twice-daily tacrolimus capsules and no new safety concerns."( Conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus capsules to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT): a phase 2 trial of stable renal transplant recipients.
Alloway, RR; Bodziak, K; Bunnapradist, S; Gaber, AO; Kaplan, B, 2013
)
0.92
" The greater bioavailability of LCP-Tacro allows for once-daily dosing and similar (AUC) exposure at a dose approximately 30% less than the total daily dose of Prograf."( Conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus capsules to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT): a phase 2 trial of stable renal transplant recipients.
Alloway, RR; Bodziak, K; Bunnapradist, S; Gaber, AO; Kaplan, B, 2013
)
0.68
" We investigated factors affecting interindividual variability of tacrolimus bioavailability in renal transplant patients."( Pharmaceutical and genetic determinants for interindividual differences of tacrolimus bioavailability in renal transplant recipients.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Miura, M; Niioka, T; Numakura, K; Saito, M; Satoh, S, 2013
)
0.86
" The tacrolimus absolute bioavailability was calculated using the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) after continuous intravenous infusion and oral formulations of tacrolimus in the same recipient."( Pharmaceutical and genetic determinants for interindividual differences of tacrolimus bioavailability in renal transplant recipients.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Miura, M; Niioka, T; Numakura, K; Saito, M; Satoh, S, 2013
)
1.13
"The median (quartile 1-quartile 3) tacrolimus relative bioavailability for recipients with the CYP3A5*1 or CYP3A5*3/*3 alleles was significantly lower for the tacrolimus QD group [9."( Pharmaceutical and genetic determinants for interindividual differences of tacrolimus bioavailability in renal transplant recipients.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Miura, M; Niioka, T; Numakura, K; Saito, M; Satoh, S, 2013
)
0.9
"The larger interindividual variability of tacrolimus bioavailability for oral formulations appears to be due to the effects of the CYP3A5 polymorphism and the tacrolimus oral formulation."( Pharmaceutical and genetic determinants for interindividual differences of tacrolimus bioavailability in renal transplant recipients.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Miura, M; Niioka, T; Numakura, K; Saito, M; Satoh, S, 2013
)
0.88
" The relative bioavailability of Advagraf and Prograf was evaluated in a single-center, open-label study of Prograf-to-Advagraf conversion in 20 patients, ranging in age from 12 to 18 years, who had a stable liver transplant and were receiving Prograf."( Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in adolescents with stable liver transplants: comparative pharmacokinetics and 1-year follow-up.
Almeida-Paulo, GN; Carcas-Sansuán, AJ; Díaz, C; Frauca, E; Frías-Iniesta, J; Hierro, L; Jara, P; Piñana, E; Tong, HY, 2013
)
0.39
"The bioavailability of Prograf and Advagraf was evaluated in an open-label conversion study in 21 stable renal transplant paediatric patients."( Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in stable paediatric renal transplant patients and 1-year follow-up.
Almeida-Paulo, GN; Alonso-Melgar, A; Carcas-Sansuán, AJ; Espinosa-Román, L; Fernández-Camblor, C; García-Meseguer, C; Medrano, N; Ramirez, E, 2014
)
0.4
" Subjects taking concomitant PIs exhibited increases in CsA and TAC exposure (AUC/dose) due to the increased apparent oral bioavailability and decreased apparent oral clearance."( Changes in clearance, volume and bioavailability of immunosuppressants when given with HAART in HIV-1 infected liver and kidney transplant recipients.
Barin, B; Benet, L; Browne, M; Carlson, L; Christians, U; Floren, L; Frassetto, L; Roland, M; Stock, P; Wolfe, A, 2013
)
0.39
"Macrocycles are ideal in efforts to tackle "difficult" targets, but our understanding of what makes them cell permeable and orally bioavailable is limited."( Macrocyclic drugs and clinical candidates: what can medicinal chemists learn from their properties?
Giordanetto, F; Kihlberg, J, 2014
)
0.4
" Bioavailability was 49 % lower in expressers of cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) than in CYP3A5 nonexpressers."( Importance of hematocrit for a tacrolimus target concentration strategy.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Bremer, S; Holford, N; Midtvedt, K; Størset, E, 2014
)
0.69
" The bioavailability and elimination of tacrolimus are affected by the patients CYP3A5 genotype."( Inclusion of CYP3A5 genotyping in a nonparametric population model improves dosing of tacrolimus early after transplantation.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Bremer, S; Hartmann, A; Jelliffe, R; Midtvedt, K; Neely, MN; Størset, E; van Guilder, M, 2013
)
0.88
" These exploratory results suggest that this generic tacrolimus preparation would be expected to offer comparable bioavailability to the reference drug in these patient subpopulations."( A randomized, crossover pharmacokinetic study comparing generic tacrolimus vs. the reference formulation in subpopulations of kidney transplant patients.
Alloway, RR; Bloom, RD; Trofe-Clark, J; Wiland, A,
)
0.62
" The estimated population mean of clearance (CL/F), volume of distribution (V/F) and absorption rate (Ka ) were 21."( Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacogenetic model of tacrolimus in the early period after kidney transplantation.
Ha, J; Ha, S; Han, N; Kim, IW; Kim, MG; Lee, JI; Min, SI; Oh, JM; Yun, HY, 2014
)
0.65
" The study was, balanced, randomized, two-treatments, two-periods, two-sequences, single dose, crossover, comparative oral bioavailability study in healthy adult human volunteers."( Prograf five milligrams versus Tacrolimus medis in healthy volunteers: a bioequivalence study.
Attia, M; Baassoumi, D; Bellahirich, W; Boujbel, L; Masri, M; Matha, V; Rizk, S, 2013
)
0.68
" We discuss the administration strategy applied and whether tacrolimus granules for oral suspension by jejunostomy affect the bioavailability and its side effects."( Modigraf administration through jejunostomy in liver transplant recipient: case report.
Alamo-Martínez, JM; Barrera-Pulido, L; Bernal-Bellido, C; Gomez, LM; Gómez-Bravo, MA; Marente, VC; Martinez, JG; Padillo-Ruiz, FJ; Serrano-Díaz-Canedo, J; Suárez-Artacho, G, 2013
)
0.63
" Compared with the drug powder, the solubility, dissolution and bioavailability of tacrolimus with the fast-dissolving solid dispersion containing tacrolimus/HP-β-CD/DOSS in the weight ratio of 5:40:4 were boosted by approximately 700-, 30- and 2-fold, respectively."( Development of novel fast-dissolving tacrolimus solid dispersion-loaded prolonged release tablet.
Cho, JH; Choi, HG; Kim, DW; Kim, JO; Kim, YI; Woo, JS; Yong, CS; Yousaf, AM, 2014
)
0.9
" We developed an FK506 cream formulation with a controllable transdermal absorption rate by manipulating the IPM:DES ratio."( Development and evaluation of a tacrolimus cream formulation using a binary solvent system.
Itai, S; Iwao, Y; Noguchi, S; Yamanaka, M; Yokota, S, 2014
)
0.69
"Tacrolimus bioavailability in steady state is similar in BID and QD formulations after conversion in stable LT recipients, excluding those with cystic fibrosis."( Pharmacokinetic study of conversion from tacrolimus twice-daily to tacrolimus once-daily in stable lung transplantation.
Berastegui, C; Blanco, A; Bravo, C; Camós, S; López-Meseguer, M; Méndez, A; Monforte, V; Pou, L; Roman, A, 2014
)
2.11
" Studies in renal transplantation demonstrate greater bioavailability with similar safety and efficacy vs."( Conversion from twice daily tacrolimus capsules to once daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-Tacro): phase 2 trial of stable liver transplant recipients.
Alloway, RR; Eckhoff, DE; Teperman, LW; Washburn, WK, 2014
)
0.7
" Relative bioavailability was calculated to be 96."( Bioequivalence of tacrolimus formulations with different dynamic solubility and in-vitro dissolution profiles.
Choi, du H; Jeong, SH; Kim, NA; Kwon, M; Park, J; Wang, H; Yeom, D; Yoo, SD, 2015
)
0.75
"The bioavailability of oral tacrolimus is influenced by enterocyte metabolism, which involves CYP3A and P-glycoprotein."( Effects of elevated tacrolimus trough levels in association with infectious enteritis on graft function in renal transplant recipients.
Amada, N; Haga, I; Kashiwadate, T; Nakamura, A; Tokodai, K, 2014
)
1.02
" The bioavailability was higher in obese rats, compared with that in lean rats."( Mechanisms of lower maintenance dose of tacrolimus in obese patients.
Huong, TT; Miyamoto, K; Mizutani, Y; Sai, Y; Sawamoto, K; Sugimoto, N, 2014
)
0.67
" However, to be successful, the drug of interest must be sufficiently well absorbed from the distal region of the gastrointestinal tract."( Assessment of tacrolimus absorption from the human intestinal tract: open-label, randomized, 4-way crossover study.
Brown, M; Connor, A; First, R; Groenewoud, A; Higaki, K; Holman, J; Kawamura, A; Keirns, JJ; Murakami, M; Ogawara, K; Sako, K; Sawamoto, T; Tsunashima, D; Undre, N; Wilding, I; Wylde, H, 2014
)
0.76
"Sublingual administration showed no clinically significant exposure, contrary to rectal administration, where all subjects had clinically relevant exposure, with a lower relative bioavailability (78%), a lower maximal blood concentration and a later time of maximal blood concentration compared with oral administration."( Rectal and sublingual administration of tacrolimus: a single-dose pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers.
Christiaans, M; Neef, C; Scheffers, I; Stifft, F; van Bortel, L; Vanmolkot, F, 2014
)
0.67
" Single-dose 24-h pharmacokinetic studies in rats demonstrated that the TAC formulation prepared by TFF exhibited higher pulmonary bioavailability with a prolonged retention time in the lung, possibly due to decreased clearance (e."( In vitro and in vivo performance of dry powder inhalation formulations: comparison of particles prepared by thin film freezing and micronization.
Batra, A; Liu, S; Peters, JI; Wang, YB; Watts, AB; Williams, RO, 2014
)
0.4
"Studies with new tacrolimus formulations showed better bioavailability and lower doses, which might translate into less toxicity."( Recent trials in immunosuppression and their consequences for current therapy.
Viklicky, O; Wohlfahrtova, M, 2014
)
0.74
" Several studies have reported that tacrolimus has variable and poor bioavailability after oral administration, apart from adverse effects such as gastrointestinal disorders, hyperglycemia, nephro- and neurotoxicity."( Nanoencapsulation of tacrolimus in lipid-core nanocapsules showed similar immunosuppressive activity after oral and intraperitoneal administrations.
Beck, RC; Dimer, FA; Friedrich, RB; Guterres, SS; Pohlmann, AR, 2014
)
1
"Tacrolimus (TAC) suffers from poor cutaneous bioavailability when administered topically using conventional vehicles with the consequence that although it is indicated for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, it has poor efficacy against psoriasis."( Polymeric micelle nanocarriers for the cutaneous delivery of tacrolimus: a targeted approach for the treatment of psoriasis.
Gurny, R; Kalia, YN; Lapteva, M; Möller, M; Mondon, K, 2014
)
2.09
" Co-administration of CLM and Tac resulted in significant increases in the oral bioavailability of Tac."( Preliminary study of interaction of clarithromycin with tacrolimus in cats.
Katayama, M; Okamura, Y; Shimamura, S; Ushio, T; Uzuka, Y, 2014
)
0.65
" The enormously enhanced oral bioavailability of tacrolimus in rats was attributed to relatively faster absorption due to accelerated dissolution of the drug from the solid SEDDS."( Preparation and pharmaceutical evaluation of new tacrolimus-loaded solid self-emulsifying drug delivery system.
Cho, KH; Choi, HG; Kim, DS; Kim, DW; Kim, JH; Kim, JO; Seo, YG; Yong, CS; Yousaf, AM, 2015
)
0.93
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioavailability of two oral tacrolimus formulations, the innovator Prograf(®) and a formulation commercialized in Mexico with the brand name Limustin(®), in children."( Limustin®, a non-innovator tacrolimus formulation, yields reduced drug exposure in pediatric renal transplant recipients.
Castañeda-Hernandez, G; Cruz-Antonio, L; García-Roca, P; Jacobo-Cabral, CO; Lozada-Rojas, L; Medeiros, M; Reyes, H, 2014
)
0.93
"Clinical performance of an amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) drug product is related to the amorphous drug content because of the greater bioavailability of this form of the drug than its crystalline form."( Determination of tacrolimus crystalline fraction in the commercial immediate release amorphous solid dispersion products by a standardized X-ray powder diffraction method with chemometrics.
Bykadi, S; Khan, MA; Rahman, Z; Siddiqui, A, 2014
)
0.74
" Tacrolimus clearance was 30% higher (95% CI 13, 46%) and bioavailability 18% lower (95% CI 2, 29%) in CYP3A5 expressers compared with non-expressers."( Improved prediction of tacrolimus concentrations early after kidney transplantation using theory-based pharmacokinetic modelling.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Bergmann, TK; Bremer, S; Hennig, S; Holford, N; Midtvedt, K; Staatz, CE; Størset, E, 2014
)
1.62
" A hallmark differentiation between this formulation and other once- and twice-daily tacrolimus products is the proprietary MeltDose drug delivery technology which is designed to improve the bioavailability of drugs with low water solubility."( Once-daily LCP-Tacro MeltDose tacrolimus for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in kidney and liver transplantations.
Grinyó, JM; Petruzzelli, S, 2014
)
0.91
"Tacrolimus prolonged release (Envarsus®; henceforth referred to as tacrolimus PR) is a new, once-daily, prolonged-release tacrolimus formulation, utilizing a drug delivery technology designed to enhance the bioavailability of drugs with low water solubility by creating a solid solution of the drug."( Tacrolimus prolonged release (Envarsus®): a review of its use in kidney and liver transplant recipients.
Garnock-Jones, KP, 2015
)
3.3
"To improve the bioavailability of orally administered drugs, we synthesized a pH-sensitive polymer (poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(2-methyl-2-carboxyl-propylene carbonate)-vitamin E, mPEG-PCC-VE) attempting to integrate the advantages of enteric coating and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibition."( Enteric polymer based on pH-responsive aliphatic polycarbonate functionalized with vitamin E to facilitate oral delivery of tacrolimus.
Ding, W; Du, Y; Han, X; He, Z; Kou, L; Li, L; Lian, H; Liu, Y; Luo, C; Qiu, S; Sun, J; Wang, M; Wang, Y; Xiang, R; Zhai, Y; Zhang, D, 2015
)
0.62
"In order to improve oral bioavailability of tacrolimus (FK506), a novel poly(methyl vinyl ether-co-maleic anhydride)-graft-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin amphiphilic copolymer (CD-PVM/MA) is developed, combining the bioadhesiveness of PVM/MA, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and cytochrome P450-inhibitory effect of CD into one."( Multifunctional Poly(methyl vinyl ether-co-maleic anhydride)-graft-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin Amphiphilic Copolymer as an Oral High-Performance Delivery Carrier of Tacrolimus.
Fu, Q; Guan, J; Hao, X; He, Z; Lian, H; Liu, X; Pan, X; Qi, W; Sun, J; Sun, Y; Wang, S; Wang, Y; Zhai, Y; Zhang, D, 2015
)
0.87
"To develop a novel self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (solid SNEDDS) with better oral bioavailability of tacrolimus, the solid SNEDDS was obtained by spray-drying the solutions containing the liquid SNEDDS and colloidal silica."( Solid self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS) for enhanced oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble tacrolimus: physicochemical characterisation and pharmacokinetics.
Baek, HH; Chang, PS; Choi, HG; Kim, DW; Kim, JO; Lim, SJ; Park, JH; Seo, YG; Yong, CS; Yousaf, AM, 2015
)
0.84
"A self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) containing tacrolimus has been developed to enhance the bioavailability and lymphatic delivery of tacrolimus."( Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System for Enhancing Bioavailability and Lymphatic Delivery of Tacrolimus.
Cho, HY; Choi, JH; Lee, YB; Oh, IJ, 2015
)
0.88
" There have been efforts to develop an alternative TAC formulation with an improved dissolution rate and oral bioavailability (BA), and the development of a rapid and sensitive analytical method for its in vivo pharmacokinetic study is an essential prerequisite."( A rapid and sensitive method to determine tacrolimus in rat whole blood using liquid-liquid extraction with mild temperature ultrasonication and LC-MS/MS.
Cho, HR; Choi, YS; Kang, MJ; Park, JS, 2016
)
0.7
"0-fold greater bioavailability (p<0."( Improved oral absorption of tacrolimus by a solid dispersion with hypromellose and sodium lauryl sulfate.
Ahn, HI; Cho, HR; Choi, YS; Ho, MJ; Jung, HJ; Kang, MJ; Lee, DR; Park, JS; Park, JY, 2016
)
0.73
" Lower TDD reflects LCPT's improved bioavailability and absorption."( Novel Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus Versus Twice-Daily Tacrolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: Two-Year Results of Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial.
Budde, K; Bunnapradist, S; Ciechanowski, K; Denny, JE; Grinyó, JM; Rostaing, L; Silva, HT, 2016
)
0.71
"The objective of this study was to develop proliposomal formulation for a poorly bioavailable drug, tacrolimus."( Design, Characterization, and In Vivo Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus Proliposomes.
Betageri, GV; Nekkanti, V; Rueda, J; Wang, Z, 2016
)
0.89
" Successful and sustained absorption of tacrolimus without reducing bioavailability compared with IR formulation was observed for ERG."( Preparation of extended release solid dispersion formulations of tacrolimus using ethylcellulose and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose by solvent evaporation method.
Higaki, K; Ogawara, K; Sako, K; Tsunashima, D; Yamashita, K, 2016
)
0.94
" Compound 13d, having good in vitro ADME profile and moderate oral bioavailability in mice, showed potent anti-inflammatory activity against hapten-induced contact hypersensitivity reaction in mice following topical and oral administration."( Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel orally available 1-phenyl-6-aminouracils containing dimethyldihydrobenzofuranol structure for the treatment of allergic skin diseases.
Fujiwara, N; Hasegawa, F; Inoue, Y; Isobe, M; Isobe, Y; Tobe, M; Tsuboi, K, 2016
)
0.43
" The oral bioavailability of tacrolimus may be affected by many factors, including patient age and gender, as well as by drug-drug interactions or genetic polymorphisms in drug metabolism."( Risk Factors for Subtherapeutic Tacrolimus Levels after Conversion from Continuous Intravenous Infusion to Oral in Children after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Bhatia, M; Garvin, JH; George, D; Jin, Z; Kahn, J; Kolb, M; Kung, AL; Offer, K; Satwani, P, 2016
)
1.01
" In order to improve the dissolution rate and oral bioavailability of tacrolimus (FK506), herein FK506 nanosuspensions with different particle size were successfully prepared using ISN method through adjusting the amount of acid-base pair and the stabilizer, the mean particle sizes of obtained FK506 nanosuspensions were 167."( Preparation, characterization and in vivo evaluation of amorphous tacrolimus nanosuspensions produced using CO2-assisted in situ nanoamorphization method.
Han, X; Wang, J; Wang, Y, 2016
)
0.91
" However, one of the critical points of TAC is the poor and variable bioavailability that influences immunosuppression, and is also responsible for adverse effects."( Meltdose Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics.
Baraldo, M, 2016
)
0.85
"CYP3A5 gene polymorphism rs776746 has been associated with lower tacrolimus dose requirements and bioavailability in both adults and children."( CYP3A5 Genotype and Time to Reach Tacrolimus Therapeutic Levels in Renal Transplant Children.
Alvarez-Elías, AC; García-Roca, P; Medeiros, M; Valverde, S; Varela-Fascinetto, G; Velásquez-Jones, L, 2016
)
0.95
" Long-term follow up is needed to address the consequences of early post-transplantation bioavailability differences due to CYP3A5 genotype."( CYP3A5 Genotype and Time to Reach Tacrolimus Therapeutic Levels in Renal Transplant Children.
Alvarez-Elías, AC; García-Roca, P; Medeiros, M; Valverde, S; Varela-Fascinetto, G; Velásquez-Jones, L, 2016
)
0.71
" The primary objective was to investigate the effect of food on the PKs and relative bioavailability of Tac ONCE-DAILY."( Effect of Breakfast on the Exposure of the Once-Daily Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Christiaans, MH; Stifft, F; Undre, N; van Hooff, JP, 2016
)
0.68
" Analysis of dose-adjusted exposure parameters showed significant increases in AUC and Cmin after SL administration confirming a better bioavailability of the SL route compared with oral route."( Sublingual administration improves systemic exposure of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: comparison with oral administration.
Apicella, L; Balletta, MM; Capone, D; Carrano, R; Federico, S; Mosca, T; Nappi, R; Russo, L; Sabbatini, M; Santangelo, M; Tarantino, G, 2016
)
0.68
"Concerns exist over the extrapolation of bioavailability studies of generic immunosuppressive drugs in healthy volunteers, regarding their efficacy and safety in kidney transplant recipients."( Bioavailability, Efficacy and Safety of Generic Immunosuppressive Drugs for Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Gupta, NR; Jaber, BL; Raman, G; Tsipotis, E; Zintzaras, E, 2016
)
0.43
"Not all generic immunosuppressive drugs have similar relative bioavailability to their brand name counterparts."( Bioavailability, Efficacy and Safety of Generic Immunosuppressive Drugs for Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Gupta, NR; Jaber, BL; Raman, G; Tsipotis, E; Zintzaras, E, 2016
)
0.43
"Tacrolimus, an immunosuppressive drug has a variable pharmacokinetic and poor oral bioavailability due to poor solubility."( Physicochemical, Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Characterization of Soluplus Stabilized Nanosuspension of Tacrolimus.
Minayian, M; Varshosaz, J; Yazdekhasti, S, 2017
)
2.11
"The precipitation anti-solvent evaporation is a nano-crystalization technique which showed to be an effective approach for enhancing water solubility and bioavailability of tacrolimus."( Physicochemical, Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Characterization of Soluplus Stabilized Nanosuspension of Tacrolimus.
Minayian, M; Varshosaz, J; Yazdekhasti, S, 2017
)
0.86
" This study evaluated the relative bioavailability of prolonged-release tacrolimus suspension versus intact capsules in healthy participants."( Relative bioavailability of single doses of prolonged-release tacrolimus administered as a suspension, orally or via a nasogastric tube, compared with intact capsules: a phase 1 study in healthy participants.
Dickinson, J; Undre, N, 2017
)
0.93
"Compared with intact capsules, the rate of absorption of prolonged-release tacrolimus from suspension was faster, leading to higher peak blood concentrations and shorter time to peak; relative bioavailability was similar with suspension administered orally."( Relative bioavailability of single doses of prolonged-release tacrolimus administered as a suspension, orally or via a nasogastric tube, compared with intact capsules: a phase 1 study in healthy participants.
Dickinson, J; Undre, N, 2017
)
0.93
" PLGA-NPs improved corneal, conjunctival and aqueous humor bioavailability of TAC."( Poly (d, l-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles for sustained release of tacrolimus in rabbit eyes.
Alshamsan, A; Kalam, MA, 2017
)
0.69
" It was hypothesized that cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A inhibition of the small intestine by voriconazole and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibition of the small intestine by risperidone exerted a synergistic effect on the bioavailability of tacrolimus."( The possible clinical impact of risperidone on P-glycoprotein-mediated transport of tacrolimus: A case report and in vitro study.
Adachi, Y; Higashi, H; Nakamura, S; Nomura, K; Taguchi, M; Watanabe, N, 2018
)
0.89
"Tacrolimus is metabolized by members of the cytochrome p450 3A subfamily, and its bioavailability depends also on P-glycoprotein."( Impact of Acute Infection Requiring Hospitalization on Tacrolimus Blood Levels in Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Beguin, C; De Meyer, M; Goffin, E; Hassoun, Z; Jadoul, M; Kanaan, N; Mourad, M; Percy, C; Wallemacq, P, 2017
)
2.15
" How acute infection precisely affects metabolism and bioavailability of tacrolimus remains to be investigated."( Impact of Acute Infection Requiring Hospitalization on Tacrolimus Blood Levels in Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Beguin, C; De Meyer, M; Goffin, E; Hassoun, Z; Jadoul, M; Kanaan, N; Mourad, M; Percy, C; Wallemacq, P, 2017
)
0.93
" In addition, there are number of formulations attempted to enhance its erratic bioavailability through various techniques namely solid dispersions, inclusion complexes, prodrug approach, SMEDDS etc."( Tacrolimus: An updated review on delivering strategies for multifarious diseases.
Dheer, D; Gupta, PN; Shankar, R, 2018
)
1.92
" However, the impact of partial drug crystallization in the drug product on the resulting bioavailability and pharmacokinetics is unknown."( Investigating the Impact of Drug Crystallinity in Amorphous Tacrolimus Capsules on Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Using Discriminatory In Vitro Dissolution Testing and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation.
Chow, ECY; Gao, Y; Purohit, HS; Sun, DD; Taylor, LS; Trasi, NS; Wen, H; Zhang, X, 2018
)
0.72
"We found that formulation did not influence bioavailability and that use of >20 mg prednisolone daily increased everolimus clearance."( A pharmacological rationale for improved everolimus dosing in oncology and transplant patients.
Burger, DM; de Fijter, JW; Guchelaar, HJ; Moes, DJAR; Reinders, MEJ; Ter Heine, R; van Erp, NP; van Herpen, CM, 2018
)
0.48
"The objective of the current study was to explore the role of ABCB1 and CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms in predicting the bioavailability of tacrolimus and the risk for post-transplant diabetes."( Artificial neural network model for predicting the bioavailability of tacrolimus in patients with renal transplantation.
Kutala, VK; Naushad, SM; Raju, SB; Thishya, K; Vattam, KK, 2018
)
0.92
" Therefore, we were interested in bioavailability aspects of novel once-daily tacrolimus (LCPT, Envarsus) and once-daily tacrolimus extended-release formulation (ER-Tac, Advagraf) compared with twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac, Prograf)."( Bioavailability and costs of once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo kidney transplantation.
Budde, K; Friedersdorff, F; Glander, P; Kasbohm, S; Liefeldt, L; Peters, R; Rudolph, B; Waiser, J; Wu, K, 2018
)
0.96
"SCY-078 is an orally bioavailable triterpenoid glucan synthase inhibitor in clinical development as an intravenous and oral treatment of fungal infections caused by Candida and Aspergillus species."( Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Drug-Drug Interaction Potential for Coadministered SCY-078, an Oral Fungicidal Glucan Synthase Inhibitor, and Tacrolimus.
Angulo, D; Atiee, G; Corr, C; Hyman, M; Murphy, G; Willett, M; Wring, S, 2019
)
0.72
"Due to the low cutaneous bioavailability of tacrolimus (TAC), penetration enhancers are used to improve its penetration into the skin."( Synthesis of poly(lactide-co-glycerol) as a biodegradable and biocompatible polymer with high loading capacity for dermal drug delivery.
Graff, P; Haag, R; Hedtrich, S; Kleuser, B; Schumacher, F; Zabihi, F, 2018
)
0.74
" Dermal bioavailability enhancement (4."( Active natural oil-based nanoemulsion containing tacrolimus for synergistic antipsoriatic efficacy.
Jain, S; Katiyar, SS; Kushwah, V; Sahu, S, 2018
)
0.74
" Relative bioavailability was calculated between generic formulations A (0."( Dosing recommendations based on population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Mexican adult patients with kidney transplant.
Isordia-Segovia, J; Medellín-Garibay, SE; Milán-Segovia, RDC; Niño-Moreno, PDC; Reséndiz-Galván, JE; Romano-Moreno, S, 2019
)
0.75
" Marinosolv allows the solubilization and thereby improvement of the bioavailability of many otherwise practically insoluble drugs, since dissolved drugs permeate faster into tissues, including ocular tissues."( Pharmacokinetics of topically applied tacrolimus dissolved in Marinosolv, a novel aqueous eye drop formulation.
Graf, P; Kirchoff, N; Knecht, C; Koller, C; König-Schuster, M; Nakowitsch, S; Prieschl-Grassauer, E; Schindlegger, Y; Siegl, C; Sipos, W; Unger-Manhart, N, 2019
)
0.78
" LCPT has greater relative bioavailability and lower peak-to-trough fluctuation compared with PR-Tac."( Pharmacokinetics of Prolonged-Release Once-Daily Formulations of Tacrolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Open-Label, Multicenter Study.
Cassuto, E; Ciurlia, G; Del Bello, A; Essig, M; Garrigue, V; Geraci, S; Govoni, M; Kamar, N; Le Meur, Y; Malvezzi, P; Mariat, C; Nicolini, G; Piotti, G; Poli, G; Rostaing, L, 2019
)
0.75
" According to pharmacokinetic model estimates, the inter- and intra-individual variabilities in bioavailability following IM injection were remarkably reduced compared with those following oral administration."( Reduced variability in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics following intramuscular injection compared to oral administration in cynomolgus monkeys: Investigating optimal dosing regimens.
Gershkovich, P; Kim, KS; Kim, SJ; Kim, TH; Lee, JB; Lee, KW; Park, JB; Shin, BS; Shin, S; Yoo, SD, 2019
)
0.82
" Tacrolimus absorption rate was 50% slower with PR-T vs IR-T."( Population pharmacokinetics of immediate- and prolonged-release tacrolimus formulations in liver, kidney and heart transplant recipients.
Bonate, P; Keirns, J; Lu, Z, 2019
)
1.66
" Tacrolimus trough concentrations and relative bioavailability were similar between formulations, supporting 1 mg:1 mg conversion from Prograf to Advagraf/Astagraf XL in clinical practice."( Population pharmacokinetics of immediate- and prolonged-release tacrolimus formulations in liver, kidney and heart transplant recipients.
Bonate, P; Keirns, J; Lu, Z, 2019
)
1.66
"35-fold higher in the recipients who had a liver with the CYP3A5*1 allele than in those with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype, whereas bioavailability was ~0."( A Minimal Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Tacrolimus in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Perspectives Related to Liver Regeneration and the cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) Genotype.
Itohara, K; Kaido, T; Matsubara, K; Nakagawa, S; Okajima, H; Tsuzuki, T; Uemoto, S; Uesugi, M; Yano, I; Yonezawa, A, 2019
)
0.76
" Interestingly, FK506 exhibited extended bioavailability in the grafts but was undetectable in systemic circulation and other tissues."( Engineering "cell-particle hybrids" of pancreatic islets and bioadhesive FK506-loaded polymeric microspheres for local immunomodulation in xenogeneic islet transplantation.
Choi, DY; Jeong, JH; Jeong, TC; Katila, N; Kim, JO; Nepal, MR; Nguyen, HT; Nguyen, TT; Park, PH; Pham, TT; Phung, CD; Pun, NT; Yong, CS; Yook, S; You, Z, 2019
)
0.51
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" Thus, promoting tissue permeability of drugs as well as prolonging their retention on the eye surface can improve their bioavailability and enhance their therapeutic effects."( Overcoming the Anatomical and Physiological Barriers in Topical Eye Surface Medication Using a Peptide-Decorated Polymeric Micelle.
Chen, W; Ge, C; Lin, S; Nan, K; Wang, D; Wang, J; Wu, B; Xie, Q; Zheng, Q, 2019
)
0.51
"An extended-release formulation of tacrolimus designed for once-daily administration (LCP-TAC) is a new prolonged-release tacrolimus (TAC-PR) formulation using a drug delivery technology designed to enhance the bioavailability of drugs compared with TAC-PR."( MeltDose Technology vs Once-Daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients.
Adani, GL; Baccarani, U; Baraldo, M; Cherchi, V; Falzone, B; Lorenzin, D; Pravisani, R; Risaliti, A; Velkoski, J, 2019
)
1.04
" Inter-occasion (dose-to-dose) variability far exceeded the interindividual variability (IIV), with an estimated variability in relative bioavailability of 55% (95% CI 48."( High Variability of Whole-Blood Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics Early After Thoracic Organ Transplantation.
De Lange, DW; Grutters, JC; Huitema, ADR; Hunault, CC; Kesecioglu, J; Kirkels, JH; Sikma, MA; Van de Graaf, EA; Van Maarseveen, EM; Verhaar, MC, 2020
)
0.84
" To bypass this bioavailability issue, we suggest administering tacrolimus intravenously and aiming below the upper therapeutic range early post-transplantation."( High Variability of Whole-Blood Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics Early After Thoracic Organ Transplantation.
De Lange, DW; Grutters, JC; Huitema, ADR; Hunault, CC; Kesecioglu, J; Kirkels, JH; Sikma, MA; Van de Graaf, EA; Van Maarseveen, EM; Verhaar, MC, 2020
)
1.08
"Amorphous solid dispersions typically improve the oral bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs."( Absorptive Dissolution Testing: An Improved Approach to Study the Impact of Residual Crystallinity on the Performance of Amorphous Formulations.
Hate, SS; Reutzel-Edens, SM; Taylor, LS, 2020
)
0.56
" Excessive variability in bioavailability may lead to higher interoccasion (dose-to-dose) variability than interindividual variability of pharmacokinetic parameters."( Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Impact of Hematocrit on Monitoring and Dosing of Tacrolimus Early After Heart and Lung Transplantation.
De Lange, DW; Huitema, ADR; Hunault, CC; Sikma, MA; Van Maarseveen, EM, 2020
)
0.79
" Thus, the TCS microneedle patch has the potential to be developed as a transdermal delivery system for tacrolimus with improved bioavailability and sustained release over a longer period."( Fabrication and Characterization of Thiolated Chitosan Microneedle Patch for Transdermal Delivery of Tacrolimus.
Ahmad, Z; Bukhari, NI; Hussain, I; Hussain, SZ; Khan, MI; Sarwar, HS; Shahnaz, G; Siddique, MI; Sohail, MF, 2020
)
0.99
" However, the narrow therapeutic window, and high inter- and intrapatient variation in bioavailability largely limited its clinical application."( Multiple genetic factors affecting the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes of tacrolimus in Chinese myasthenia gravis patients.
Dong, XH; Jin, WL; Li, X; Li, Y; Li, ZB; Luo, ZH; Meng, HY; Peng, YY; Xu, LQ; Xu, Q; Yan, CK; Yang, H, 2020
)
0.78
" Numbers of formulations have been attempted to enhance the erratic bioavailability of FK506 through various techniques."( Cationic nanoemulsions with prolonged retention time as promising carriers for ophthalmic delivery of tacrolimus.
Chen, X; Lin, X; Liu, Z; Song, H; Tao, C; Zeng, L; Zhang, J; Zhang, M, 2020
)
0.77
" The improved bioavailability may be beneficial for simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients (SPK)."( The use of LCP-Tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant recipients.
Ajaimy, M; Akalin, E; Azzi, Y; Campbell, A; Graham, JA; Kinkhabwala, M; Konicki, A; Liriano-Ward, L; Pynadath, C; Rocca, JP; Torabi, J, 2020
)
0.91
"The aim of the study was to assess bioavailability aspects of tacrolimus formulations during conversion from twice-daily (TAC BID) to once-daily (TAC OD) formulation in 89 stable kidney transplant recipients."( Conversion From a Twice-Daily to a Once-Daily Tacrolimus Formulation in Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Kamińska, D; Kościelska-Kasprzak, K; Krajewska, M; Kuriata-Kordek, M; Mazanowska, O; Poznański, P; Zielińska, D, 2020
)
1.06
" We present a first application for the analysis of bioavailability changes in formulation conversion."( Predictive engines based on pharmacokinetics modelling for tacrolimus personalized dosage in paediatric renal transplant patients.
Borobia, A; Carcas-Sansuan, A; Prado-Velasco, M, 2020
)
0.8
" It has poor cutaneous bioavailability when administered topically using conventional delivery approach, thus it has poor efficacy against the psoriasis."( Topical delivery of Tacrolimus using liposome containing gel: An emerging and synergistic approach in management of psoriasis.
Awasthi, R; Jindal, S; Kulkarni, GT; Singhare, D, 2020
)
0.88
"16), implying that these differences occurred because of altered bioavailability rather than modified clearance."( Chronopharmacokinetics and Food Effects of Single-Dose LCP-Tacrolimus in Healthy Volunteers.
Alloway, RR; Brennan, DC; Cohen, EA; Kerr, J; Meier-Kriesche, U; Momper, JD; Moten, MA; Stevens, DR; Trofe-Clark, J, 2020
)
0.8
" In the real-life nonfasting setting, the PK-profiles were flat but comparable after the morning and evening doses, showing slower absorption rate and lower AUC compared with the fasting-state."( Fasting Status and Circadian Variation Must be Considered When Performing AUC-based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Debord, J; Gustavsen, MT; Klaasen, RA; Midtvedt, K; Robertsen, I; Vethe, NT; Woillard, JB, 2020
)
0.77
" Oral tacrolimus formulation presents poor bioavailability with intraindividual and interindividual variations; however, some factors affecting its blood concentration among pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) recipients are still unclear."( Clinical Factors Affecting the Dose Conversion Ratio from Intravenous to Oral Tacrolimus Formulation among Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients.
Fujiwara, K; Ishida, H; Kanamitsu, K; Shimada, A; Tsukahara, H; Washio, K; Yorifuji, T, 2020
)
1.27
" This study aimed to determine, in kidney transplant patients, the influence of different genotypic clusters involving these SNPs CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A4*22, and CYP3A5*3 on Tacrolimus bioavailability during the first (PTP1) and the second (PTP2) posttransplant phase (PT)."( Influence of CYP3A polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients.
Aouam, K; Ben Fredj, N; Boughattas, NA; Chaabane, A; Chadli, Z; Hammouda, M; Hannachi, I; Kerkeni, E; Kolsi, A; Touitou, Y, 2021
)
1.09
"Following single topical administration, TAC was absorbed slowly with a Tmax of 4 h and an absolute bioavailability of 11%."( Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of Tacrolimus after Topical Administration: Implications for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.
Dong, L; Erbas, VE; Fanzio, PM; Feturi, FG; Gorantla, VS; Oksuz, S; Plock, JA; Sahin, H; Schnider, JT; Solari, MG; Spiess, AM; Unadkat, JM; Venkataramanan, R, 2020
)
0.83
" The degradation rate, together with release and diffusion characteristics provides an estimate of the bioavailability and therefore can be a guide to future formulation development."( Predicting drug release and degradation kinetics of long-acting microsphere formulations of tacrolimus for subcutaneous injection.
Ashtikar, M; Gao, GF; Kaihara, M; Kojima, R; Modh, H; Shanehsazzadeh, S; Tajiri, T; Wacker, MG; Yoshida, T, 2021
)
0.84
"Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), is a promising antioxidant; however, low bioavailability owing to lipid-solubility is a limiting factor."( Water-soluble coenzyme Q10 provides better protection than lipid-soluble coenzyme Q10 in a rat model of chronic tacrolimus nephropathy.
Bae, SK; Chung, BH; Chung, SJ; Cui, S; Kim, HL; Kim, JH; Ko, EJ; Lee, KE; Lim, SW; Luo, K; Quan, Y; Shin, YJ; Yang, CW, 2021
)
0.83
"Food reduces tacrolimus bioavailability after immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) and after a new prolonged-release tacrolimus formulation (PR-Tac), when using a high-fat breakfast, but the effects of a continental breakfast on PR-Tac are unknown."( Differential Effect of a Continental Breakfast on Tacrolimus Formulations With Different Release Characteristics.
Behnisch, R; Bollmann, J; Bruckner, T; Burhenne, J; Czock, D; Haefeli, WE; Huppertz, A; Zorn, M, 2021
)
1.24
" Additionally, we identified supporting evidence for the nephroprotective function of gallic acid using molecular docking and bioavailability investigations."( Identification of gallic acid as a active ingredient of Syzygium aromaticum against tacrolimus-induced damage in renal epithelial LLC-PK1 cells and rat kidney.
Hong, G; Jung, K; Kang, KS; Kim, CE; Kim, DW; Lee, HL; Lee, JH; Park, M, 2021
)
0.85
" To compare bioavailability among different dose ranges, the blood concentration was divided by the dose (C/D)."( Switching from Intravenous to Oral Tacrolimus Reduces its Blood Concentration in Paediatric Cancer Patients.
Asakura, Y; Chiba, T; Endo, M; Goto, S; Hirai, D; Ito, S; Kudo, K; Miura, S; Nihei, S; Nishiya, N; Oyake, T; Ujiie, H, 2021
)
0.9
" One such extended-release formulation of tacrolimus known as LCPT allows once-daily dosing and improves bioavailability compared to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-tacrolimus)."( De novo tacrolimus extended-release tablets (LCPT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus in adult heart transplantation: Results of a single-center non-inferiority matched control trial.
Carey, SA; Cheung, ZO; Clark, DM; Doss, AK; Felius, J; Gottlieb, RL; Guerrero-Miranda, CY; Hall, SA; Jamil, AK; Kale, P; Kerlee, KR; Martits-Chalangari, K; Sam, T; van Zyl, JS, 2021
)
1.32
" Once-daily formulations of Tac (LCP-Tac and PR-Tac) have been recently designed for higher bioavailability and a more consistent exposure over time, as opposed to the twice-daily, administered immediate-release formulation of Tac (IR-Tac)."( A single-center, open-label, randomized cross-over study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of once-daily prolonged-release formulations of tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients.
Achilles, EG; Buchholz, BM; Fischer, L; Herden, U; Ott, A; Sterneck, M, 2021
)
0.82
" LCP-Tac demonstrated a greater bioavailability compared to PR-Tac."( A single-center, open-label, randomized cross-over study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of once-daily prolonged-release formulations of tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients.
Achilles, EG; Buchholz, BM; Fischer, L; Herden, U; Ott, A; Sterneck, M, 2021
)
0.82
" CYP3A5 is expressed in both the intestine and the liver and has been shown to impact both the bioavailability and metabolism of orally administered tacrolimus."( Impact of Pharmacogenetics on Intravenous Tacrolimus Exposure and Conversions to Oral Therapy.
Frame, D; Gersch, CL; Hertz, DL; Kidwell, KM; Li, Y; Marcath, LA; Nguyen, V; Pasternak, AL; Rae, JM; Scappaticci, G, 2022
)
1.18
" TAC bioavailability was decreased when co-administered with St John's wort (SJW), cranberry, rooibos tea, and boldo in human models by induction of the CYP450 system and/or P-gp efflux pump, meanwhile, the TAC bioavailability was increased when co-administered with grapefruit juice (GFJ), schisandra, berberine, turmeric, pomegranate juice, pomelo, and ginger in human and or animal models by inhibition effect on CYP450 system and/or P-gp efflux pump."( Tacrolimus and herbs interactions: a review.
Abushammala, I, 2021
)
2.06
" Tacrolimus, a salvage therapy before colectomy, is usually orally administered, though its bioavailability is low compared intravenous administration."( Intravenous tacrolimus is a superior induction therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis compared to oral tacrolimus.
Fujii, T; Hibiya, S; Kawamoto, A; Kinoshita, K; Nagahori, M; Ohtsuka, K; Okamoto, R; Saito, E; Shimizu, H; Takenaka, K; Watanabe, M, 2021
)
1.91
" We also investigated the sensitivity of estimates to absorption rate constants that are often fixed at a published value in tacrolimus population PK analyses."( Sensitivity of estimated tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic profile to assumed dose timing and absorption in real-world data and simulated data.
Beck, C; Birdwell, KA; Choi, L; Van Driest, SL; Weeks, HL; Williams, ML, 2022
)
1.23
"There was no appreciable difference in parameter estimates with assumed versus extracted last-dose time, and our sensitivity analysis revealed little difference between parameters estimated across a range of assumed absorption rate constants."( Sensitivity of estimated tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic profile to assumed dose timing and absorption in real-world data and simulated data.
Beck, C; Birdwell, KA; Choi, L; Van Driest, SL; Weeks, HL; Williams, ML, 2022
)
1.02
"The final estimated values for apparent clearance, the volume of distribution, and absorption rate were 21."( Pharmacokinetic Model Based on Stochastic Simulation and Estimation for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus in Korean Adult Transplant Recipients.
Choi, S; Ghim, JR; Han, S; Hong, Y; Jung, SH; Kang, G, 2022
)
0.94
"Wuzhi tablets are a dose-sparing agent for tacrolimus (TAC) in China and increase the bioavailability of TAC."( Prediction of tacrolimus and Wuzhi tablet pharmacokinetic interaction magnitude in renal transplant recipients.
Chen, P; Chen, X; Dai, R; Fu, Q; Huang, M; She, Y; Wang, C, 2022
)
1.34
" Patients with nondigestive system cancer had higher apparent volume of distribution and absorption rate constant than digestive system cancer."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of apatinib in adult cancer patients.
Chen, KG; Guo, ZX; Kan, M; Li, Q; Li, Y; Liu, HY; Liu, XL; Shi, JY; Song, LL; van den Anker, J; Yang, XM; Ye, PP; Zhang, YH; Zhao, FR; Zhao, W, 2023
)
0.91
" Envarsus® is also a prolonged-release once-daily tacrolimus formulation, developed using MeltDose™ drug-delivery technology to increase drug bioavailability; improved bioavailability results in low patient drug absorption variability and less pronounced peak-to-trough fluctuations."( EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients.
Baccar, S; Brennfleck, F; Brunner, SM; Geissler, EK; Götz, M; Holub-Hayles, I; James, B; Mutzbauer, I; Schlitt, HJ; Wöhl, DS, 2023
)
1.16
"The EnGraft compares bioavailability and tests superiority of Envarsus® (test arm) versus Advagraf™ (comparator arm) in de novo LTx recipients."( EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients.
Baccar, S; Brennfleck, F; Brunner, SM; Geissler, EK; Götz, M; Holub-Hayles, I; James, B; Mutzbauer, I; Schlitt, HJ; Wöhl, DS, 2023
)
0.91
" Improving bioavailability and increasing C/D ratio using Envarsus could reduce renal dysfunction and other tacrolimus-related toxicities; previous trials have shown that a higher C/D ratio (i."( EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients.
Baccar, S; Brennfleck, F; Brunner, SM; Geissler, EK; Götz, M; Holub-Hayles, I; James, B; Mutzbauer, I; Schlitt, HJ; Wöhl, DS, 2023
)
1.12
"LCP-tacrolimus displays enhanced oral bioavailability compared to immediate-release (IR-) tacrolimus."( Tacrolimus Exposure Before and After a Switch From Twice-Daily Immediate-Release to Once-Daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus: The ENVARSWITCH Study.
Anglicheau, D; Buchler, M; Choukroun, G; Colosio, C; Conti, F; Crépin, S; Debette-Gratien, M; Dharancy, S; Duvoux, C; Etienne, I; Garrouste, C; Mariat, C; Marquet, P; Merville, P; Micallef, L; Monchaud, C; Rerolle, JP; Salamé, E; Saliba, F; Tafzi, N; Thierry, A; Woillard, JB, 2023
)
2.91
" We hypothesized that rectal administration of Tac would effectively mitigate PEP by ensuring systemic and pancreatic bioavailability of Tac."( Rectal administration of tacrolimus protects against post-ERCP pancreatitis in mice.
Barakat, MT; Bottino, R; Ding, Y; Frymoyer, AR; Husain, SZ; Jayaraman, T; Khalid, A; Lin, YC; Murayi, JA; Ni, J; Papachristou, GI; Poropatich, R; Sheth, SG; Swaminathan, G; Tsai, CY; Wen, L; Yu, M, 2023
)
1.21

Dosage Studied

Tacrolimus once daily Advagraf has been developed to provide a more convenient dosing regimen to improve adherence. Optimizing either MMF or EC-MPS along with a combined thymoglobulin/daclizumab induction resulted in a low AR rate and acceptably high renal function at 12 months.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Drug dose-response analyses indicate that the level of cellular calcineurin activity correlates closely with the ability of these cells to undergo apoptosis."( Correlation of calcineurin phosphatase activity and programmed cell death in murine T cell hybridomas.
Bierer, BE; Burakoff, SJ; Fruman, DA; Mather, PE, 1992
)
0.28
" The immunosuppressant drug FK 506 could inhibit the development of the arthritis when present during the activation period in culture or when dosed to the recipients of activated cells."( Characterisation of passively transferred antigen arthritis induced by methylated bovine serum albumin in the rat: effect of FK 506 on arthritis development.
Griffiths, RJ; Li, SW; Mather, ME, 1992
)
0.28
" With a lower dosage of this agent, antibody production and immune deposits in the glomerular basement membrane occurred despite the suppression of proteinuria."( FK506, a novel immunosuppressive agent, induces antigen-specific immunotolerance in active Heymann's nephritis and in the autologous phase of Masugi nephritis.
Maezawa, A; Naruse, T; Okubo, Y; Ono, K; Tsukada, Y; Yano, S, 1990
)
0.28
" Lessons are still being learned about dosage and what determines safe dose schedules."( Selected topics on FK 506, with special references to rescue of extrahepatic whole organ grafts, transplantation of "forbidden organs," side effects, mechanisms, and practical pharmacokinetics.
Abu-Elmagd, K; Fung, JJ; Porter, KA; Starzl, TE; Todo, S; Tzakis, A, 1991
)
0.28
" A dose-response study showed that FK506 suppressed EAU induction at doses 10-30 times lower CsA when given on days 0-14 postimmunization, while 15-DSG suppressed the disease development at doses very similar to CsA."( Effects of FK506, 15-deoxyspergualin, and cyclosporine on experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis in the rat.
Kawashima, H; Mochizuki, M, 1990
)
0.28
"3 mg/kg/day-treated group, whereas it did decrease significantly in the 1 mg/kg/day-treated group, decreased further with the increase in dosage of FK-506, and decreased markedly in the 30 mg/kg/day group, The number of CD4-CD8-thymocytes did not show any change, even in the high-dosage groups."( The influence of FK-506 on the thymus and spleen in normal C3H/He mice: flow cytometric analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations.
Chen, MF; Maruyama, M; Suzuki, H; Yano, S, 1991
)
0.28
" On the basis of the dose-response study, the capacity of FK506 in preventing EAU induction is 10-30 times more intense than that of cyclosporine."( Effects of a new immunosuppressive agent, FK506, on experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis in rats.
Fujino, Y; Kawashima, H; Mochizuki, M, 1988
)
0.27
" These findings show that, at the dosage selected, the powerful immunosuppressive activities of FK-506 were associated with little evidence of acute toxicity and with no indications of additive toxicity with CsA."( Immunosuppressive activity, lymphocyte subset analysis, and acute toxicity of FK-506 in the rat. A comparative and combination study with cyclosporine.
Hasan, NU; Stephen, M; Thomson, AW; Whiting, PH; Woo, J, 1989
)
0.28
" Because of poor water solubility, the conventional intravenous dosage forms of FK 506 (C-FK 506) contain surfactants such as HCO-60 which may cause adverse effects."( Physicochemical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of liposomal tacrolimus (FK 506) in rats.
Jusko, WJ; Lee, MJ; Straubinger, RM, 1995
)
0.52
"Liposomal FK 506 may be an improved dosage form for parenteral use."( Physicochemical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of liposomal tacrolimus (FK 506) in rats.
Jusko, WJ; Lee, MJ; Straubinger, RM, 1995
)
0.52
" Oral FK506 did not consistently increase bile flow, as evaluated by a bile salt dose-response curve (9, 18, 36 mumol/min sodium taurocholate) but did significantly increase bile chloride secretion."( The effect of FK506 on canine bile flow.
Fairchild, RB; Kaminski, DL; Reese, JC; Solomon, H; Warty, V, 1993
)
0.29
"Delayed administration of tetrandrine, a novel broad-spectrum anti-inflammatory agent, to BB rats at a dosage schedule of 20 mg kg-1 day-1 from 79 days of age reduced the cumulative incidence of diabetes from 73."( Synergy between tetrandrine and FK506 in prevention of diabetes in BB rats.
Heil, BV; Lieberman, I; Seow, WK; Thong, YH, 1993
)
0.29
" The peak concentration time (Tmax) was observed within 30 min after administration in all dosing groups (1-10 mg/kg) with or without feeding, whereas the oral absorption of FK506 was reduced to about 50% by gavage at a dose of 1 mg/kg."( Oral absorption of FK506 in rats.
Fujisaki, J; Hata, T; Hirano, Y; Iwasaki, K; Kagayama, A; Kaibara, A; Ohara, K; Tanimoto, S, 1993
)
0.29
" This has caused difficulty in defining the optimum dosage regimen and has highlighted the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring."( Tacrolimus. A review of its pharmacology, and therapeutic potential in hepatic and renal transplantation.
Faulds, D; Fitton, A; Peters, DH; Plosker, GL, 1993
)
1.73
" To implement the RCCCT design, a novel FK-506 intelligent dosing system (IDS) was used to guide all doses to prospectively achieve the target concentration range specific in the study protocol."( Computer-guided concentration-controlled trials in autoimmune disorders.
Doyle, H; Fung, J; Lieberman, R; McCauley, J; McMichael, J; Starzl, TE; Thomson, A; van Thiel, D, 1993
)
0.29
" In vivo, basal testosterone levels and secretion in response to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) stimulation in ACl rats treated with intramuscular (IM) injections of FK506 at a dosage of 1 or 2 mg/kg/d for 14 days were not different from those of age-matched normal controls."( Effect of FK506 on rat Leydig cell function--in vivo and in vitro study.
Murase, N; Starzl, TE; Tai, J; Tze, WJ, 1994
)
0.29
" Two of these 3 children achieved resolution with either steroid therapy or an increased dosage of FK506, while the third child developed chronic rejection."( FK506 conversion therapy in pediatric liver transplantation.
Concepcion, W; Cox, K; Egawa, H; Esquivel, CO; Lawrence, L; So, SK, 1994
)
0.29
"32 mg/kg/day of FK506 from the day of operation while group III was given the same dosage from the 4th day after transplantation."( Limited effectiveness of FK506 administration for ongoing rejection in heterotopic rat heart transplantation.
Aoyagi, S; Hirano, A; Hisatomi, K; Isomura, T; Kosuga, K; Nishimi, M; Ohishi, K; Sato, T, 1994
)
0.29
" Adverse effects requiring tacrolimus dosage adjustment include nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, alterations in glucose metabolism, and infection or susceptibility to malignancy."( Tacrolimus, a new immunosuppressant--a review of the literature.
Hooks, MA, 1994
)
2.03
" Blood samples were obtained at 24 hours after the final dosage of the agent."( Administration time-dependent toxicity of a new immunosuppressive agent, tacrolimus (FK 506).
Ebihara, A; Fujimura, A, 1994
)
0.52
" Careful monitoring and FK 506 dosing adjustment may be necessary to maintain therapeutic concentration and minimize toxicity in patients receiving this agent."( FK 506 (Tacrolimus) metabolism by rat liver microsomes and its inhibition by other drugs.
Burckart, GJ; Prasad, TN; Starzl, TE; Stiff, DD; Subbotina, N; Venkataramanan, R; Zemaitis, MA, 1994
)
0.72
"We have investigated the importance of cytochrome P-450IIIA enzyme activity in influencing dosage of the immunosuppressive drugs FK 506 and cyclosporine after liver transplantation."( Importance of cytochrome P-450IIIA activity in determining dosage and blood levels of FK 506 and cyclosporine in liver transplant recipients.
Cakaloglu, Y; Devlin, J; Tredger, JM; Williams, R, 1994
)
0.29
" Meticulous monitoring of FK 506 trough levels and dosage adaptation are compulsory when concomitant treatment with such a drug is unavoidable."( FK 506/fluconazole interaction enhances FK 506 nephrotoxicity.
Assan, R; Bismuth, H; Feutren, G; Fredj, G; Larger, E,
)
0.13
" Dexamethasone (Dex) never suppressed histamine paw edema of mice before 1 hr after its dosing as new protein(s) synthesis is required."( Nitric oxide- and hydrogen peroxide-mediated gene expression by glucocorticoids and FK506 in histamine paw edema of mice.
Oyanagui, Y, 1994
)
0.29
"To clarify the mechanism of glucose intolerance induced by FK506, a novel immunosuppressant, 5 or 10 mg/kg/day of FK506 was dosed orally to rats for 2 weeks, and 125I-insulin binding to the erythrocytes, plasma glucose and insulin levels, and pancreatic insulin content were examined."( Mechanism of FK506-induced glucose intolerance in rats.
Hirano, Y; Mine, Y; Mitamura, T; Noguchi, H; Ohara, K; Tamura, T, 1994
)
0.29
" All adverse effects disappeared or improved when FK506 was stopped or when the dosage was decreased."( FK506 treatment of noninfectious uveitis.
Ishigatsubo, Y; Ishioka, M; Isobe, K; Nakamura, S; Ohno, S; Tanaka, S; Watanabe, N, 1994
)
0.29
" In the long term, azathioprine should be suspended and the dosage of corticosteroids should be reduced."( [Rejection of a liver allograft. Diagnosis and treatment].
Calmus, Y, 1994
)
0.29
" A low dosage of FK 506 starting on day 0, in combination with DSG starting on day 0 or day 4 (but not on day 7), had a synergistic effect in prolonging allograft survival for 14."( The superior effect of the combination of FK 506 and deoxyspergualin on rat cardiac allograft survival.
Ishibashi, M; Jiang, H; Li, D; Namiki, M; Okuyama, A; Sonoda, T; Takahara, S, 1994
)
0.29
" The objective was to evaluate whether oral FK 506 dosing was viable and whether blood concentrations in the range 10-20 ng/ml would prove to be practical."( FK 506 versus cyclosporin in the prevention of renal allograft rejection--European pilot study: six-week results.
Buist, L; Christiaans, M; Erhard, J; Krauss, M; Mayer, D; Schleibner, S; van Hooff, J; Wagner, K, 1995
)
0.29
" Thus in a dosage inside the therapeutic range defined from skin transplantations, FK-506 generated a number of toxic effects including a considerable nephrotoxic effect."( Nephrotoxicity of FK-506 in the rat. Studies on glomerular and tubular function, and on the relationship between efficacy and toxicity.
Dieperink, H; Kemp, E; Leyssac, PP; Nielsen, FT; Starklint, H, 1995
)
0.29
" We propose that the optimal dosage of FK506 obtained by monitoring the trough levels using the IMx method should maintain a 10-20 ng/ml level during the first month, and a 5-10 ng/ml level at the second and third months."( A proposal of FK506 optimal dosing in living related liver transplantations.
Hashida, T; Inomata, Y; Okajima, H; Tanaka, K; Ueda, M; Uemoto, S; Yamaoka, Y, 1995
)
0.29
"25 mL of 50% ethanol, and were sacrificed on day 5 following 4 days dosing with FK506 (0."( Effects of FK506 on an experimental model of colitis in rats.
Goto, H; Hayakawa, T; Hoshino, H; Ozawa, T; Sugiyama, S, 1995
)
0.29
"The accuracy and precision of an intelligent dosing system (IDS) for FK506 in predicting doses to achieve target drug levels has been prospectively evaluated in transplant and autoimmune patients."( An intelligent and cost-effective computer dosing system for individualizing FK506 therapy in transplantation and autoimmune disorders.
Doyle, H; Fung, J; Lieberman, R; McCauley, J; McMichael, J; Starzl, TE, 1993
)
0.29
"The blood concentration-time curve was studied in 10 kidney transplant recipients on 26 occasions after oral dosage of 2 to 18 mg every 12 hours."( Intra- and interindividual variation in the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (FK506) in kidney transplant recipients--importance of trough level as a practical indicator.
Ichikawa, Y; Ihara, H; Ikoma, F; Nagano, S; Nojima, M; Shinkuma, D, 1995
)
0.53
" It seems that the incidence of the adverse effects depends on the dosage of FK506."( [A phase II study of FK506 (tacrolimus) on refractory uveitis associated with Behçet's disease and allied conditions].
Inaba, G; Masuda, K; Mochizuki, M; Sakane, T, 1995
)
0.59
" Histopathologically, there were no abnormal changes in the testis, seminal vesicle or prostate in any rats dosed with Prograf, but intra-ductal eosinophilic globules, probably degeneration of the sperm cells, were observed in the epididymis of the 3 mg/kg/day group."( Effect of Prograf (FK506) on spermatogenesis in rats.
Fujihira, S; Fujii, T; Fujimoto, Y; Hisatomi, A; Mine, Y; Ohara, K, 1996
)
0.29
" Dose-response experiments revealed that 1 x 10(8) cells/recipient was most effective in causing prolonged graft survival after termination of FK 506 treatment."( Effects of portal venous inoculation with donor splenocytes on lung allograft survival in dogs.
Ichinari, H; Koga, Y; Matsuzaki, Y; Shibata, K; Shimizu, T; Yoshioka, M, 1996
)
0.29
"The smaller dosage of tacrolimus led to a higher trough concentration of 14."( Three-times-daily monotherapy with tacrolimus (FK 506) in kidney transplantation.
Fukunishi, T; Hanafusa, T; Ichikawa, Y; Kyo, M; Nagano, S, 1996
)
0.89
" Because of this variability, the narrow therapeutic index of tacrolimus, and the potential for several drug interactions, monitoring of tacrolimus blood concentrations is useful for optimisation of therapy and dosage regimen design."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus.
Burckart, G; Jain, A; Lever, J; McMichael, J; Prasad, T; Starzl, T; Swaminathan, A; Venkataramanan, R; Warty, V; Zuckerman, S, 1995
)
0.82
" A tacrolimus artificial intelligence modeling system (AIMS) was used to guide patient dosing to achieve target concentrations specified by the study protocols."( Computer-guided randomized concentration-controlled trials of tacrolimus in autoimmunity: multiple sclerosis and primary biliary cirrhosis.
Doyle, H; Irish, W; Lieberman, R; Marino, I; McCauley, J; McMichael, J, 1996
)
1.16
" Patients were evaluated at 42 days after transplant for the occurrence of the first episode of acute rejection or toxicity, necessitating a dosage reduction."( An open-label, concentration-ranging trial of FK506 in primary kidney transplantation: a report of the United States Multicenter FK506 Kidney Transplant Group.
Laskow, DA; Matas, AJ; Mendez, R; Neylan, JF; Vincenti, F, 1996
)
0.29
" A lack of histologic improvement (or worsening) at 1 week was demonstrated in a significant proportion of patients (27%); increased tacrolimus dosing provided rejection reversal or improvement in 1-2 weeks in each of these patients."( Tacrolimus therapy for refractory acute renal allograft rejection: definition of the histologic response by protocol biopsies.
Bruce, DS; Cronin, D; Haas, M; Josephson, MA; Millis, JM; Newell, KA; Piper, JB; Thistlethwaite, JR; Woodle, ES, 1996
)
1.94
" Corticosteroid dosage requirements were reduced in the tacrolimus-treated group with the cumulative dosage exposure from 20."( Transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure: comparing tacrolimus versus cyclosporine for immunosuppression and the outcome in elective transplants. European FK506 Liver Study Group.
Devlin, J; Williams, R, 1996
)
0.79
" Extreme inter- and intrapatient variability and lack of correlation between drug dosage and drug blood levels necessitate consistent and reliable therapeutic drug monitoring."( A simplified whole blood enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ProTrac II) for tacrolimus (FK506) using proteolytic extraction in place of organic solvents.
Ersfeld, D; Jensen, T; Jevans, A; Kobayashi, M; MacFarlane, G; Scheller, D; Wong, PY, 1996
)
0.52
" Mean arterial blood pressure (MBP) was significantly increased in the two highest dosage groups (B,C) at 2 h of infusion: (MBP; P: +2."( The acute effects of FK-506 on renal haemodynamics, water and sodium excretion and plasma levels of angiotensin II, aldosterone, atrial natriuretic peptide and vasopressin in pigs.
Golbaekdal, K; Nielsen, CB; Pedersen, EB, 1996
)
0.29
" Thereafter, serum IgE levels progressively decreased in parallel with a reduced dosage of FK506."( Extremely high serum level of IgE during immunosuppressive therapy: paradoxical effect of cyclosporine A and tacrolimus.
Ariga, T; Furuta, H; Kawamura, N; Kobayashi, I; Okano, M; Sakiyama, Y; Tame, A, 1997
)
0.51
"Nifedipine decreased the daily and cumulative dosage requirement of tacrolimus."( Nifedipine interaction with tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients.
Gordon, FD; Jenkins, RL; Lewis, WD; Marcos-Alvarez, A; Seifeldin, RA, 1997
)
0.83
" In eight patients who suffered from toxicity, a reduction in the dosage of tacrolimus was attempted with simultaneous MMF therapy."( Mycophenolate mofetil added to immunosuppression after liver transplantation--first results.
Bechstein, WO; Keck, H; Klupp, J; Knoop, M; Langrehr, JM; Lemmens, HP; Neuhaus, P; Neuhaus, R; Platz, KP; Pratschke, J, 1997
)
0.53
" Both groups showed no statistical differences in number, kidney function, age, body weight, sex distribution, steroid dosage and follow-up time after transplantation."( Effects of cyclosporin A and FK 506 on lipid metabolism and fibrinogen in kidney transplant recipients.
Arlt, M; Brückner, D; Dietl, KH; Hohage, H; Spieker, C; Zidek, W, 1997
)
0.3
" Chronic oral dosing has been associated with numerous side effects."( Tacrolimus (FK 506) overdose: a report of five cases.
Hodgman, M; Krenzelok, EP; Mrvos, R, 1997
)
1.74
" Monotherapy with a lower dosage of FK506 or transplantation with impure pig islets resulted in increased graft survival time over controls, but less than that with the 2 mg/kg per day FK506."( Prolongation of pig islet xenograft survival in rats immunosuppressed with FK506.
Cheung, SS; Tai, J; Tze, WJ, 1997
)
0.3
" Further definition of its pathogenesis and improved dosing strategies for both of these drugs may reduce the impact of nephrotoxicity on both short-term and long-term outcomes."( Nephrotoxicity associated with cyclosporine and FK506.
Gonwa, TA; Klintmalm, GB, 1995
)
0.29
" One of these toxic findings was cataract, and we have found that cataract appeared in rats dosed orally with FK506 for 13 weeks and more."( Cataract development induced by repeated oral dosing with FK506 (tacrolimus) in adult rats.
Fukuhara, Y; Hisatomi, A; Ishida, H; Mitamura, T; Murato, K; Ohara, K; Takahashi, Y, 1997
)
0.53
" Accordingly, we reduced overall immunosuppression for the last seven patients in the FK506 group; the decrease in FK506 and prednisone dosage led to a decrease in the early infection rate without an increase in the rejection rate."( FK506 effectiveness in reducing acute rejection after heart transplantation: a prospective randomized study.
Arbustini, E; Campana, C; Gavazzi, A; Goggi, C; Grossi, P; Ippoliti, G; Martinelli, L; Pellegrini, C; Regazzi, M; Rinaldi, M; Vigano, M, 1997
)
0.3
" Further studies are needed to establish the exact dosage and therapeutic levels of the drug."( FK506 effectiveness in reducing acute rejection after heart transplantation: a prospective randomized study.
Arbustini, E; Campana, C; Gavazzi, A; Goggi, C; Grossi, P; Ippoliti, G; Martinelli, L; Pellegrini, C; Regazzi, M; Rinaldi, M; Vigano, M, 1997
)
0.3
" No proteinuria was observed after total dosage of immunosuppressants was increased."( [A case of recurrent IgA nephropathy following renal transplantation under tacrolimus (FK506)].
Hatori, M; Honda, M; Ichimaru, N; Imai, E; Kokado, Y; Kyo, M; Matsumiya, K; Miyamoto, M; Nonomura, N; Okuyama, A; Takahara, S; Takao, T; Yokoyama, K, 1997
)
0.53
" These may be dose-related, and low-dose tacrolimus regimens, by allowing reduction in dosage of other diabetogenic immunosuppressive agents, have produced encouraging results in pancreas transplantation in many centres."( Update of tacrolimus in pancreas transplantation.
Ericzon, BG; Wijnen, RM, 1997
)
0.97
" Unexpectedly, IFN-gamma markedly reduced the incidence of IDDM as compared with control rats when administered six times per week at a dosage of 280,000 U between ages 30-35 to 105 days or ages 60-64 to 105 days."( Paradoxical antidiabetogenic effect of gamma-interferon in DP-BB rats.
Calori, G; Di Marco, R; Garotta, G; Grasso, S; Magro, G; Meroni, PL; Mughini, L; Nicoletti, F; Stivala, F; Zaccone, P, 1998
)
0.3
" The study design required dosing with less tacrolimus (mean mg/day +/- SEM), which was achieved at 1 week (23."( Tacrolimus (FK506) and mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy versus tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation.
Bynon, JS; Contreras, JL; Eckhoff, DE; Frenette, LR; Hudson, SL; McGuire, BM, 1998
)
2
" Dose-response curves for TGF-beta-mediated signaling in primary fibroblasts and thymocytes isolated from either wild-type or FKBP12-deficient mice were identical."( FKBP12 is not required for the modulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor I signaling activity in embryonic fibroblasts and thymocytes.
Bassing, CH; Heitman, J; Matzuk, MM; Muir, S; Shou, W; Wang, XF, 1998
)
0.3
" Thus, a clinically-relevant dosage of FK506 attenuated both glial activation and white matter changes in chronic cerebral ischemia in the rat."( Dose-dependent, protective effect of FK506 against white matter changes in the rat brain after chronic cerebral ischemia.
Akiguchi, I; Kimura, J; Tomimoto, H; Wakita, H, 1998
)
0.3
" Early dosing regimens were determined by attempts to balance the toxicities (representing a dose ceiling) against rejection (for minimum dosing)."( Tacrolimus (FK506) and the pharmaceutical/academic/regulatory gauntlet.
Demetris, AJ; Fung, JJ; Starzl, TE; Todo, S, 1998
)
1.74
" Further studies of the combination of FK 506 and MMF in kidney transplant recipients to further define the optimal dosing regimen are warranted."( FK 506 and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients: six-month results of a multicenter, randomized dose ranging trial. FK 506 MMF Dose-Ranging Kidney Transplant Study Group.
Mendez, R, 1998
)
0.3
" Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus during maintenance therapy is often considered in the event of rejection or when adverse events do not respond to dosage reduction."( Suggested guidelines for the use of tacrolimus in pancreas/kidney transplantation.
Bartlett, ST; Burke, GW; Gruessner, RW; Stock, PG, 1998
)
0.86
"The dosage of tacrolimus (D), the trough blood concentrations (C) and the evolution of the D/C ratio were followed for 1 year after transplantation in so adult patients (38 males and 12 females) undergoing liver allograft."( Influence of posttransplant time on dose and concentration of tacrolimus in liver transplant patients.
Andres, I; Brunet, M; Corbella, J; Lopez, R; Pou, L; Rodamilans, M, 1998
)
0.9
"007) and daily and cumulative cyclosporine dosage at 5 years (P=0."( Chronic renal failure following liver transplantation: a retrospective analysis.
Fisher, NC; Gunson, BK; Lipkin, GW; Neuberger, JM; Nightingale, PG, 1998
)
0.3
" In these transfected cells, the dose-response curve for the inhibition of FcepsilonRI-mediated exocytosis by FK506 was shifted to the left, indicating an increased drug sensitivity of BKO-transfected cells."( Direct evidence that FK506 inhibition of FcepsilonRI-mediated exocytosis from RBL mast cells involves calcineurin.
Brand, P; Hultsch, T; Kincaid, RL; Knop, J; Lohmann, S; Saloga, J, 1998
)
0.3
"2 mg/kg to 30 ml/min/kg when dosed at 1 and 3 mg/kg."( Disposition of L-732,531, a potent immunosuppressant, in rats and baboons.
Carey, KD; Chiu, SH; Colletti, A; Hawkins, T; Karanam, BV; Lavin, M; Miller, RR; Montgomery, T; Stearns, RA; Tang, YS; Vincent, SH, 1998
)
0.3
"In this study we have shown that FK506 is able to delay corneal allograft rejection at a much lower dosage than CSA without a higher incidence of side effects related to toxicity or overimmunosuppression."( A comparative investigation of FK506 and cyclosporin A in murine corneal transplantation.
Braunstein, S; Godehardt, E; Reinhard, T; Reis, A; Sundmacher, R, 1998
)
0.3
"Although it is important to maintain an appropriate blood concentration of FK506 after liver transplantation, significant interindividual variability in the actual FK506 dosage has been observed, presumably due to the wide variability of cytochrome P450 3A4 activity in liver microsomes."( Relationship between in vivo FK506 clearance and in vitro 13-demethylation activity in living-related liver transplantation.
Chisuwa, H; Hashikura, Y; Ikegami, T; Iwasaki, K; Katsuyama, Y; Kawasaki, S; Nakazawa, Y; Terada, M, 1998
)
0.3
" Eight days after stopping mibefradil, tacrolimus was restarted at the same dosage and the subsequent plasma concentrations remained in the therapeutic range."( Serious interaction between mibefradil and tacrolimus.
Gallino, A; Giostra, E; Krähenbühl, S; Menafoglio, A, 1998
)
0.83
" Tacrolimus dosing was increased 1-2 mg every 1 or 2 days until hepatic enzymes started to improve."( Reversal of early acute rejection with increased doses of tacrolimus in liver transplantation: a pilot study.
Berger, F; Boillot, O; Gratadour, P; Le Derf, Y; Mechet, I; Meeus, P; Paliard, P; Scoazec, JY; Souraty, P; Viale, JP, 1998
)
1.45
"This pilot study suggests that increasing tacrolimus dosage could be considered as treatment against early acute rejection episodes including the severe grade."( Reversal of early acute rejection with increased doses of tacrolimus in liver transplantation: a pilot study.
Berger, F; Boillot, O; Gratadour, P; Le Derf, Y; Mechet, I; Meeus, P; Paliard, P; Scoazec, JY; Souraty, P; Viale, JP, 1998
)
0.81
" The clearance was approximately 2-fold higher than that previously observed in adults; this could explain the higher dosage requirements in children."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (FK506) in paediatric liver transplant recipients.
Bernard, O; Clement De Clety, S; De Ville De Goyet, J; Firdaous, I; Furlan, V; Lykavieris, L; Möller, A; Otte, JB; Reding, R; Schäfer, A; Sokal, E; Stadler, P; Taburet, AM; Undre, NA; Van Leeuw, V; Wallemacq, PE,
)
0.45
" In many cases, a reduction in dosage can reverse these adverse effects."( The role of tacrolimus in adult kidney transplantation: a review.
Laskow, DA; Neylan, JF; Pirsch, JD; Shapiro, RS; Tomlanovich, SJ; Vergne-Marini, PJ, 1998
)
0.68
" The dosage of tacrolimus (D), the trough blood concentrations (C), and the evolution of the ratio (D/C) were followed up for 2 years after transplantation in 50 adult patients (38 men, 12 women) undergoing liver allograft transplantation."( Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus in liver transplantation, phase III FK506 multicenter Spanish Study Group: a two-year follow-up.
Andres, I; Andreu, H; Bilbao, I; Brunet, M; Corbella, J; Lopez, R; Margarit, C; Pou, L; Rimola, A, 1998
)
0.94
" Monitoring blood concentrations of tacrolimus is vital, and appropriate dosage adjustments are required when the two drugs are administered concurrently to avoid serious interactions such as nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity."( Interaction between tacrolimus and nefazodone in a stable renal transplant recipient.
Bennett, WM; deMattos, AM; Norman, DJ; Olyaei, AJ,
)
0.73
" FK-506 increased the level of blood glucose in rats when given daily at an oral dosage of 3 mg/kg for 14 days."( Studies of repeated administration of FK-506 on myocardial metabolism in rats.
Hoshi, K; Ichihara, K; Satoh, K; Yamamoto, A; Yoshida, A, 1998
)
0.3
" Cyclosporine was dosed to achieve a target concentration range between 150 and 450 ng/mL during the first 8 weeks after transplant."( Relationship of tacrolimus (FK506) whole blood concentrations and efficacy and safety after HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation.
Fay, JW; Fitzsimmons, WE; Klein, JL; Maher, RM; Nash, RA; Przepiorka, D; Ratanatharathorn, V; Weisdorf, DJ; Wingard, JR; Zhu, J, 1998
)
0.65
" The pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus were obtained from serial blood samples collected over 96 hours, after single oral and intravenous administration prior to and during an 18-day concomitant rifampin dosing phase."( Effects of rifampin on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.
Bekersky, I; Dressler, D; Fisher, RM; Hebert, MF; Marsh, CL, 1999
)
0.92
" The concentration of MPA and MPAG in plasma, bile, and urine samples obtained over one dosing interval was measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography."( Effect of t-tube clamping on the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in liver transplant patients on oral therapy of mycophenolate mofetil.
Fung, JJ; Hamad, I; Jain, AB; Venkataramanan, R; Warty, VS; Zhang, S; Zuckerman, S, 1999
)
0.3
" This review summarizes the current world experience with tacrolimus in pediatric renal transplantation, and describes the details of tacrolimus dosing and the treatment of tacrolimus-related complications."( Tacrolimus in pediatric renal transplantation: a review.
Shapiro, R, 1998
)
1.99
"5 mg/kg) were given orally by gavage; thrice weekly according to the monotherapy or dual-therapy dosing protocol."( Immunosuppressive effect of combination schedules of brequinar with leflunomide or tacrolimus on rat cardiac allotransplantation.
Antoniou, EA; Chondros, K; D'Silva, M; Deroover, A; Howie, AJ; McMaster, P, 1999
)
0.53
" dosing in monkeys using an ex vivo whole blood IL-2 production assay."( Discovery of ascomycin analogs with potent topical but weak systemic activity for treatment of inflammatory skin diseases.
BaMaung, NY; Clark, RF; Fey, TA; Gauvin, DM; Gunawardana, IW; Henry, CL; Kawai, M; Kopecka, H; Krause, R; Lane, BC; Liu, L; Luly, JR; Marsh, K; Miller, L; Mollison, KW; Or, YS; Pong, M; Rhoades, TA; Sheets, MP; Smith, ML; Trevillyan, JM; Tu, NP; Wagner, R; Wiedeman, PE; Xie, Q, 1998
)
0.3
" The o/w emulsion of tacrolimus may be an improved dosage form via the enteral route."( Pharmacokinetic advantages of a newly developed tacrolimus oil-in-water-type emulsion via the enteral route.
Hashimoto, H; Kazui, T; Muhammad, BA; Suzuki, K; Suzuki, Y; Uno, T, 1999
)
0.88
" Employing the Korsmeyer-Peppas model of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release, it was further shown that release of the drug from the dosage form was governed largely by surface erosion of the surfactant-enriched tablet matrix."( Design and characterization of a surfactant-enriched tablet formulation for oral delivery of a poorly water-soluble immunosuppressive agent.
Grim, YA; Matuszewska, BK; Ostovic, D; Ruddy, SB; Storey, DE, 1999
)
0.3
" Tacrolimus was absorbed rapidly after oral dosing with a mean Cmax and Tmax of 42 ng/ml and 1 h, respectively."( The disposition of 14C-labeled tacrolimus after intravenous and oral administration in healthy human subjects.
Hata, T; Iwasaki, K; Kawamura, A; Möller, A; Schäfer, A; Shiraga, T; Teramura, Y; Undre, NA, 1999
)
1.5
") was administered over the 18-day period of study according to three dosage regiments: delayed (days 9-17), discontinuous (days 0-8) and continuous (days 0-17) administrations."( Efficacy of delayed or discontinuous FK506 administrations on nerve regeneration in the rat sciatic nerve crush model: lack of evidence for a conditioning lesion-like effect.
Gold, BG; Gordon, HS; Wang, MS, 1999
)
0.3
" The initial dosage was 5 mg twice/day, but it was gradually increased to 10 mg twice/day, aiming at 15-20 ng/ml."( Sudden hearing loss associated with tacrolimus in a kidney-pancreas allograft recipient.
Corwin, C; Hunsicker, LG; Ku, YM; Min, DI; Rayhill, S; Wu, YM, 1999
)
0.58
" A nonnephrotoxic and powerful immunosuppressant such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) could allow a reduction of cyclosporine dosage or its withdrawal and an improvement in renal function in these patients."( Conversion of liver transplant recipients on cyclosporine with renal impairment to mycophenolate mofetil.
Alvárez-Cienfuegos, J; Girala, M; Gómez-Manero, N; Herrero, JI; Pardo, F; Prieto, J; Quiroga, J; Sangro, B, 1999
)
0.3
" The optimal dosing regimen after pediatric heart transplantation is unknown."( Optimal dosing of intravenous tacrolimus following pediatric heart transplantation.
Boyle, GJ; Griffith, BP; Law, YM; Miller, SA; Myers, JL; Robinson, BV; Webber, SA, 1999
)
0.59
" Both FK506 and QND evoked a significant QTc prolongation, and the dose-response relationship showed an anti-clockwise hysteresis, FK506-induced QTc prolongation persisted throughout the duration of the experiment despite a decline in the plasma FK506 concentration, whilst QND-induced QTc prolongation disappeared as plasma concentrations decreased."( Sustained QT prolongation induced by tacrolimus in guinea pigs.
Iga, T; Minematsu, T; Ohtani, H; Sato, H, 1999
)
0.58
" Mean blood levels paralleled dosing in both groups, but were greater in the Rej patients (10."( Tacrolimus rescue in liver transplant patients with refractory rejection or intolerance or malabsorption of cyclosporine. The US Multicenter FK506 Liver Study Group.
Klein, A, 1999
)
1.75
" The acute adverse effects of calcineurin inhibitors on renal haemodynamics are thought to be directly related to the cyclosporin or tacrolimus dosage and blood concentration."( Immunosuppressant-induced nephropathy: pathophysiology, incidence and management.
Bennett, WM; de Mattos, AM; Olyaei, AJ, 1999
)
0.51
" Once patients were tolerating oral medications, tacrolimus infusion was converted to oral dosing using a 4:1 conversion."( Increased clearance of tacrolimus in children: need for higher doses and earlier initiation prior to bone marrow transplantation.
Beltz, S; Graham-Pole, J; Kedar, A; Mehta, P; Wingard, JR, 1999
)
0.87
" When neurotoxicity occurs after OLTX under tacrolimus, it is usually a minor complication and responds readily to a reduction in the dosage of or a temporary withdrawal of tacrolimus."( Conversion to neoral for neurotoxicity after primary adult liver transplantation under tacrolimus.
Brody, D; Fung, J; Hamad, I; Jain, A; Kanal, E; Rishi, N, 2000
)
0.79
"Neurological complications after OLTX disorders that occur under tacrolimus and that fail to respond to a reduction in the dosage can be treated safely by conversion to Neoral."( Conversion to neoral for neurotoxicity after primary adult liver transplantation under tacrolimus.
Brody, D; Fung, J; Hamad, I; Jain, A; Kanal, E; Rishi, N, 2000
)
0.77
" The described dosing schedule resulted in subtherapeutic daclizumab levels in liver transplant recipients."( Experience with daclizumab in liver transplantation: renal transplant dosing without calcineurin inhibitors is insufficient to prevent acute rejection in liver transplantation.
Ascher, NL; Freise, C; Hirose, R; Osorio, RW; Quan, D; Roberts, JP; Stock, PG, 2000
)
0.31
" The dosing regimen used in renal transplant recipients is most likely insufficient for liver transplant patients."( Experience with daclizumab in liver transplantation: renal transplant dosing without calcineurin inhibitors is insufficient to prevent acute rejection in liver transplantation.
Ascher, NL; Freise, C; Hirose, R; Osorio, RW; Quan, D; Roberts, JP; Stock, PG, 2000
)
0.31
"The recommended dosage for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with cyclosporin (CyA) for pediatric kidney transplant recipients is 600 mg/m(2) twice daily (b."( Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil are influenced by concomitant immunosuppression.
Filler, G; Mai, I; Zimmering, M, 2000
)
0.31
" In yeast, expression of ARA9 results in an increase in the maximal agonist response and a leftward shift in the AHR dose-response curve."( ARA9 modifies agonist signaling through an increase in cytosolic aryl hydrocarbon receptor.
Bradfield, CA; Bunger, MK; Dunham, EE; Glover, E; LaPres, JJ, 2000
)
0.31
" Reduction of tacrolimus dosage or conversion to cyclosporin A (CsA) has been used as an effective treatment in reviewed cases."( Sirolimus in pediatric gastrointestinal transplantation: the use of sirolimus for pediatric transplant patients with tacrolimus-related cardiomyopathy.
Jaffe, JS; Pappas, PA; Pinna, AD; Rusconi, P; Thompson, JF; Tzakis, AG; Weppler, D, 2000
)
0.88
" Thus, dose-response relationships for FK506 (0."( Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of tacrolimus-induced QT prolongation in guinea pigs.
Iga, T; Minematsu, T; Ohtani, H; Sato, H, 1999
)
0.56
" A mean reduction in TAC dosage of 18."( Clinical and histological analysis of acute tacrolimus (TAC) nephrotoxicity in renal allografts.
Ishikawa, N; Oshima, T; Shimizu, T; Shinmura, H; Tanabe, K; Tokumoto, T; Toma, H; Yamaguchi, Y, 1999
)
0.56
" A reduction of TAC dosage may be effective in improving allograft functions."( Clinical and histological analysis of acute tacrolimus (TAC) nephrotoxicity in renal allografts.
Ishikawa, N; Oshima, T; Shimizu, T; Shinmura, H; Tanabe, K; Tokumoto, T; Toma, H; Yamaguchi, Y, 1999
)
0.56
" Further studies need to be conducted to optimize the dosage schedule and to determine therapeutic ranges, efficacy, and safety."( Tacrolimus: an alternative for graft-versus-host disease prevention.
Kennedy, LA; Lee, TJ, 2000
)
1.75
"The dosing regimen for conversion from cyclosporin A (CsA) to tacrolimus immunosuppression was studied in 12 pediatric liver allograft recipients."( Conversion from cyclosporin A to tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplantation.
Debray, D; Fourre, C; Furlan, V; Taburet, AM, 2000
)
0.83
" Two of the responders showed rebound worsening when tacrolimus was stopped or the dosage reduced rapidly, and one of these eventually required proctectomy."( Topical tacrolimus may be effective in the treatment of oral and perineal Crohn's disease.
Casson, DH; Eltumi, M; Murch, SH; Tomlin, S; Walker-Smith, JA, 2000
)
0.99
"An obvious dose-response relationship for the antiproliferative effects of each drug was detected."( Comparison of the in vitro antiproliferative effects of five immunosuppressive drugs on lymphocytes in whole blood from cats.
Craigmill, AL; Gregory, CR; Kyles, AE, 2000
)
0.31
" For example, human terfenadine hepatic extraction goes from 95% in the absence of a competitive inhibitor to 35% in the presence of one (ketoconazole, 200 mg po Q 12 h dosed to steady-state)."( Cytochrome P450 3A4 in vivo ketoconazole competitive inhibition: determination of Ki and dangers associated with high clearance drugs in general.
Boxenbaum, H,
)
0.13
" None of the rats receiving dosage of 5 mg/kg/d showed any neurotoxic symptoms throughout the two-week test period."( Correlation between neurotoxic events and intracerebral concentration of tacrolimus in rats.
Harihara, Y; Imamura, H; Sakamoto, Y; Sato, H, 2000
)
0.54
" In the second set of experiments the dosage regime was identical, but at the end of the treatment period the animals were anaesthetized for implantation of arterial and venous cannulae, and then received a saline (plus inulin) infusion for 6 h, during which time blood and urine samples were collected."( The hypomagnesaemic action of FK506: urinary excretion of magnesium and calcium and the role of parathyroid hormone.
Lote, CJ; Thewles, A; Wood, JA; Zafar, T, 2000
)
0.31
" Although preliminary, these data demonstrate significant transplanted organ-specific differences in MMF pharmacology and/or bioavailability, and suggest the need for separate evaluation of MMF dosing for each transplant type."( Levels of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide derivative in the plasma of liver, small bowel and kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus and cellcept combination therapy.
de Faria, L; Esquenazi, V; Miller, J; Tsaroucha, AK; Tzakis, AG; Zucker, K, 2000
)
0.51
" Clearance of tacrolimus was calculated from the blood levels for patients during intravenous dosing and normalized by ideal body weight."( Tacrolimus clearance is age-dependent within the pediatric population.
Blamble, D; Chan, KW; Danielson, M; Hilsenbeck, S; Krance, R; Przepiorka, D, 2000
)
2.11
" The symptoms of CsA- and tacrolimus-associated neurotoxicity may be reversed in most patients by substantially reducing the dosage of immunosuppressant or discontinuing these drugs."( Neurotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors: impact and clinical management.
Bechstein, WO, 2000
)
0.61
" However, it is unrelated to the dosage and the concentration of cyclosporine or tacrolimus."( Arteriolopathy in non-episode biopsies of renal transplant allograft.
Ichimaru, N; Imai, E; Kojima, Y; Kokado, Y; Kyakuno, M; Kyo, M; Miyamoto, M; Morozumi, K; Nakamura, T; Oka, K; Okuyama, A; Permpongkosol, S; Takahara, S; Tanaka, T; Toki, K; Wang, JD, 2000
)
0.53
" The frequency and the severity of arteriolopathy are not concerned with dosage and concentration of CsA or FK506."( Arteriolopathy in non-episode biopsies of renal transplant allograft.
Ichimaru, N; Imai, E; Kojima, Y; Kokado, Y; Kyakuno, M; Kyo, M; Miyamoto, M; Morozumi, K; Nakamura, T; Oka, K; Okuyama, A; Permpongkosol, S; Takahara, S; Tanaka, T; Toki, K; Wang, JD, 2000
)
0.31
" Our data show that, although arteriolopathy is characteristic of drug-induced nephropathy, it is unrelated to dosage and concentration of cyclosporine or tacrolimus in non-episode biopsy."( Clinicopathological evaluation in non-episode biopsies of renal transplant allograft.
Ding, XQ; Hatori, M; Ichimaru, N; Imai, E; Inoue, T; Kameoka, H; Kojima, Y; Kokado, Y; Kyakuno, M; Kyo, M; Miyamoto, M; Morozumi, K; Nakamura, T; Oka, K; Okuyama, A; Permpongkosol, S; Takahara, S; Tanaka, T; Toki, K; Wang, JD, 2000
)
0.5
"1 mg/kg/dose given twice a day, and the dosage was adjusted to achieve blood levels between 10 and 15 ng/mL."( Oral tacrolimus treatment of severe colitis in children.
Balint, JP; Bousvaros, A; Daum, F; Day, AS; Ferry, GD; Freeman, KB; Griffiths, AM; Kirschner, BS; Leichtner, AM; Parker-Hartigan, L; Werlin, SL; Zurakowski, D, 2000
)
0.82
"Details of drug dosage histories, sampling times and concentrations were collected retrospectively from routine therapeutic drug monitoring data accumulated for at least 4 days after surgery."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Asian paediatric liver transplant patients.
Aw, M; Chan, SY; Charles, BG; Ho, PC; Lim, SM; Quak, SH; Sam, WJ, 2000
)
0.59
"Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus (FK) is widely performed to assist adjustments of drug dosage but may be an inadequate surrogate of the immunosuppression induced."( In vitro pentamer formation as a biomarker of tacrolimus-related immunosuppressive activity after liver transplantation.
Tolou-Ghamari, Z; Tredger, JM; Wendon, J, 2000
)
0.85
" There was a significant decrease in mean tacrolimus dosage (P<0."( Posttransplant diabetes mellitus in pediatric thoracic organ recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.
Boyle, GJ; Griffith, BP; Law, YM; Lawrence, K; Miller, SA; Paolillo, JA; Pigula, FA; Wagner, K; Webber, SA, 2001
)
0.8
" Variables considered were age, total bodyweight (TBW), body surface area (BSA), time after initiation of treatment (T), gender, haematocrit (Hct), albumin (Alb), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (gammaGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bilirubin (BIL), creatinine clearance (CL(CR)) and dosage of concomitant corticosteroids (EST)."( Covariate effects on the apparent clearance of tacrolimus in paediatric liver transplant patients undergoing conversion therapy.
Blázquez, A; García Sánchez, MJ; Manzanares, C; Manzanares, J; Medina, E; Santos-Buelga, D; Urruzuno, P, 2001
)
0.57
"The proposed model for tacrolimus CL can be applied for a priori dosage calculations, although the results should be used with caution because of the unexplained variability in the CL."( Covariate effects on the apparent clearance of tacrolimus in paediatric liver transplant patients undergoing conversion therapy.
Blázquez, A; García Sánchez, MJ; Manzanares, C; Manzanares, J; Medina, E; Santos-Buelga, D; Urruzuno, P, 2001
)
0.88
" Development of this complication was associated with elevated intravenous FK 506 dosing schedules, with the mean cumulative dose 43% higher than treated patients with unaffected kidney function."( Renal complications and development of hypertension in the European study of FK 506 and cyclosporin in primary liver transplant recipients.
Bismuth, H; Calne, R; Devlin, J; Groth, C; McMaster, P; Neuhaus, P; Otto, G; Pichlmayr, R; Williams, R, 1994
)
0.29
"05), and insomnia was not related to any dosing variable."( Neurological complications in the European multicentre study of FK 506 and cyclosporin in primary liver transplantation.
Bismuth, H; Calne, R; Groth, C; McMaster, P; Neuhaus, P; Otto, G; Pichlmayr, R; Williams, R, 1994
)
0.29
"In a retrospective study, we analysed the FK 506 dosage used in primary liver graft recipients enrolled in the European FK 506 multicenter trial conducted from September 1990 to January 1992."( Optimal FK 506 dosage in patients under primary immunosuppression following liver transplantation.
Bismuth, H; Calne, R; Groth, C; McMaster, P; Neuhaus, P; Otto, G; Pichlmayr, R; Williams, R; Winkler, M, 1994
)
0.29
" Blood was sampled during the 24 hours subsequent to dosing on day 7 (after the first MMF dose), on day 14 (after multiple MMF doses) and on day 21 (after CsA/TRL washout)."( Comparison of the effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid.
Barten, MJ; Christians, U; Klupp, J; Morris, RE; van Gelder, T, 2001
)
0.6
"The objective of this study was to estimate tacrolimus population parameter values and to evaluate the ability of the maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) Bayesian fitting procedure to predict tacrolimus blood levels, using the traditional strategy of monitoring only trough levels, for dosage individualization in liver transplant patients."( Failure of traditional trough levels to predict tacrolimus concentrations.
Baulieux, J; Charpiat, B; Ducerf, C; Fourcade, N; Jelliffe, RW; Macchi-Andanson, M, 2001
)
0.83
" In association with short-term monitoring of blood trough levels of TAC, the dosage should be reduced early if symptoms of an acute gastroenteritis are present."( Rotavirus infection as cause of tacrolimus elevation in solid-organ-transplanted children.
Ellemunter, H; Fischer, H; Frühwirth, M; Hochleitner, B; Königsrainer, A; Margreiter, R; Simma, B, 2001
)
0.59
" Further study is needed to evaluate long-term safety and efficacy and to determine the best dosage regimen."( Tacrolimus in dermatologic disorders.
Skaehill, PA, 2001
)
1.75
"Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and subsequent immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus have been cornerstones in the recovery of patients from end-stage liver failure, but there has been no critical dosage regimen for tacrolimus therapy, especially the initial dosage."( Pharmacokinetic and prognostic significance of intestinal MDR1 expression in recipients of living-donor liver transplantation.
Hashida, T; Inui , K; Masuda, S; Saito, H; Tanaka, K; Uemoto, S, 2001
)
0.53
" Steady state oral pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained between 1 and 3 months after transplant while patients were receiving twice daily dosing of tacrolimus to maintain whole blood levels between 10 and 20 ng/ml."( The effect of gut metabolism on tacrolimus bioavailability in renal transplant recipients.
Alloway, RR; Gaber, AO; Johnson, JA; Tuteja, S, 2001
)
0.79
" Drug efficacy and potency was calculated based on dose-response curves of the drug-mediated decrease in CD4(+)/CD8alpha(+)/CD25(+) cells."( Coexpression of CD4 and CD8alpha on rat T-cells in whole blood: a sensitive marker for monitoring T-cell immunosuppressive drugs.
Diaz-Romero, J; Vogt, G; Weckbecker, G, 2001
)
0.31
" The aim of this study was to evaluate the circadian variation of this drug in continuous intravenous administration, with regard to the dosing scheme for conversion from intravenous to oral therapy."( Chrono and clinical pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in continuous intravenous administration.
Akao, T; Habuchi, T; Kato, T; Sato, K; Satoh, S; Shimoda, N; Suzuki, T; Tachiki, Y; Tada, H; Tsuchiya, N, 2001
)
0.57
" As the oral tacrolimus absorption was found to be variable between preoperative and postoperative states in identical patients, the conversion dosage cannot be calculated from preoperative oral or postoperative intravenous pharmacokinetics."( Chrono and clinical pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in continuous intravenous administration.
Akao, T; Habuchi, T; Kato, T; Sato, K; Satoh, S; Shimoda, N; Suzuki, T; Tachiki, Y; Tada, H; Tsuchiya, N, 2001
)
0.94
"Overcoming adverse effects of immunosuppressors can be achieved by combining different drugs, thus allowing a dosage reduction."( Combined immunosuppression of mycophenolate mofetil and FK506 for myoblast transplantation in mdx mice.
Asselin, I; Camirand, G; Caron, NJ; Tremblay, JP, 2001
)
0.31
" An adjustment of dosage of immunosuppressants according to the clinical situation and, particularly in the case of MMF, spreading the total dosage over more than 2 daily doses are often sufficient."( Adverse gastrointestinal effects of mycophenolate mofetil: aetiology, incidence and management.
Behrend, M, 2001
)
0.31
" In patients with altered renal function, introduction of MMF or sirolimus can allow a reduction in dosage or complete withdrawal of cyclosporine."( [Minimization of immunosuppression].
Thervet, E, 2001
)
0.31
"No clear correlation existed between tacrolimus dosage and blood concentrations (r2=0."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children who receive cut-down or full liver transplants.
Charles, BG; Lynch, SV; Staatz, CE; Taylor, PJ; Tett, SE; Willis, C, 2001
)
0.87
"Pharmacokinetic information obtained in this study may assist physicians in making individualized dosage decisions in regard to tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplant recipients."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children who receive cut-down or full liver transplants.
Charles, BG; Lynch, SV; Staatz, CE; Taylor, PJ; Tett, SE; Willis, C, 2001
)
0.8
" The purpose of this study was to review our experience with MMF dosing and the role of mycophenolic acid (MPA) levels for therapeutic drug monitoring in a population of pediatric heart transplant recipients."( Mycophenolic acid levels in pediatric heart transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil.
Boucek, MM; Dipchand, AI; McCrindle, BW; Pietra, B; Rosebrook-Bicknell, HL, 2001
)
0.31
" Dosing by body surface area (mg/m(2)), age and interval from transplantation were all independently associated with MPA level."( Mycophenolic acid levels in pediatric heart transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil.
Boucek, MM; Dipchand, AI; McCrindle, BW; Pietra, B; Rosebrook-Bicknell, HL, 2001
)
0.31
"(1) There is marked individual variation in pharmacokinetics of MMF in pediatric patients; (2) dosing by body surface area may be advantageous; (3) higher MMF doses may be required at younger ages and in the early period after transplantation; (4) lower MMF doses may be required with concurrent tacrolimus therapy; and (5) serum trough MPA levels may relate to efficacy."( Mycophenolic acid levels in pediatric heart transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil.
Boucek, MM; Dipchand, AI; McCrindle, BW; Pietra, B; Rosebrook-Bicknell, HL, 2001
)
0.49
"Since tacrolimus absorption was better under fasted condition than under the presence of food, it is thought that the highest medicine effect with the least dosage is provided by preprandial oral administration."( Effective oral administration of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients.
Kamoya, K; Kimikawa, M; Teraoka, S; Toma, H, 2001
)
1.07
" The estimated population pharmacokinetic parameters can be applied for a priori dosage calculations in adult patients with LDLT."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult recipients receiving living-donor liver transplantation.
Fukatsu, S; Hashida, T; Igarashi, T; Inui, K; Kiuchi, T; Saito, H; Takayanagi, K; Tanaka, K; Uemoto, S; Yano, I, 2001
)
0.6
" Approximately 3(1/4) years after these unresponsive ulcers appeared, the reduction of the oral dosage of tacrolimus resulted in the total remission of the ulcers."( Resolution of oral ulcerations after decreasing the dosage of tacrolimus in a liver transplantation recipient.
Arriba, L; Hernández, G; Jiménez, C; Lucas, M; Moreno, E, 2001
)
0.76
" The human preparations were exposed to concentrations of 8 x 10(-9), 8 x 10(-8) and 8 x 10(-6) M FK506 followed by a cumulative dose-response curve with isoprenaline as a non-selective beta-adrenoceptor agonist."( FK506 does not affect cardiac contractility and adrenergic response in vitro.
Domeier, E; Grapow, M; Hakim, K; Janssen, PM; Kögler, H; Milting, H; Prestle, J; Seidler, T; Wangemann, T; Zeitz, O; Zerkowski, HR, 2001
)
0.31
" Optimal dosing strategies for SKPT recipients remain to be determined."( Multicenter survey of daclizumab induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients.
Alloway, RR; Bruce, DS; Humar, A; Kaufman, DB; Light, JA; Lo, A; Sollinger, HW; Stratta, RJ; Sutherland, DE, 2001
)
0.31
" Because of increasing use of FK506 in solid organ transplantation, caution should be paid with FK506 dosage monitoring in cases of peripheral nervous system symptoms."( Severe axonal polyneuropathy after a FK506 overdosage in a lung transplant recipient.
Boukriche, Y; Brugière, O; Castier, Y; Fournier, M; Mal, H; Stocco, J, 2001
)
0.31
" To achieve the best compromise between prevention of rejection and toxicity, dosage individualisation is required and this can be achieved through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)."( Immunosuppressive therapy for paediatric transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations.
del Mar Fernández De Gatta, M; Domínguez-Gil, A; García, MJ; Santos-Buelga, D, 2002
)
0.31
" Data on this subject are not consistent because of differences in dosage and duration of treatment and the presence of comorbidity in the studied patients."( Different effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on renal hemodynamics and blood pressure in healthy subjects.
Abrahams, A; Hené, RJ; Klein, IH; Koomans, HA; Ligtenberg, G; van Ede, T, 2002
)
0.63
"We conclude that tacrolimus given during 2 weeks in the currently advised dosage has no unfavorable effects on renal hemodynamics and blood pressure in healthy individuals."( Different effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on renal hemodynamics and blood pressure in healthy subjects.
Abrahams, A; Hené, RJ; Klein, IH; Koomans, HA; Ligtenberg, G; van Ede, T, 2002
)
0.97
" These results could have important implications regarding the dosing of immunosuppressives in living donor liver transplant recipients."( Living donor liver transplant recipients achieve relatively higher immunosuppressant blood levels than cadaveric recipients.
Bak, T; Everson, GT; Kam, I; Kugelmas, M; Stolpman, N; Trotter, JF; Wachs, M, 2002
)
0.31
" In conclusion, LRD recipients have significantly decreased tacrolimus dosing requirements compared with CAD recipients during the first 3 months posttransplantation despite having similar tacrolimus concentrations."( Tacrolimus dosing requirements and concentrations in adult living donor liver transplant recipients.
Andreoni, KA; Dupuis, RE; Fair, JH; Fann, AL; Gerber, DA; Johnson, MW; Shrestha, R; Taber, DJ, 2002
)
2
" Alternative dosing regimens based on pharmacokinetic simulation and limited clinical trials are being investigated."( A multicenter, open-label, comparative trial of two daclizumab dosing strategies vs. no antibody induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids for the prevention of acute rejection in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant
Alloway, RR; Hodge, E; Lo, A; Stratta, RJ, 2002
)
0.52
" Accordingly, the use of OST may constitute an alternative option for tacrolimus administration in low body weight organ recipients, to allow dosage titration in the early post-transplant weeks."( Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus oral suspension in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
Chardot, C; Evrard, V; Janssen, M; Otte, JB; Paul, K; Reding, R; Sokal, E; Wallemacq, P; Wilmotte, L, 2002
)
0.83
" The combination of SRL with cyclosporin (CsA) has been studied, and a 4-hour interval between dosing of the two drugs is recommended even though it is inconvenient for patients and may affect compliance."( A clinical pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus and sirolimus combination immunosuppression comparing simultaneous to separated administration.
Fraser, A; MacDonald, AS; Mahalati, K; McAlister, VC; Peltekian, KM, 2002
)
0.59
"To study the dose-response relationship of the pharmacokinetic interaction between diltiazem and tacrolimus in kidney and liver transplant recipients."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and diltiazem: dose-response relationship in kidney and liver transplant recipients.
Jones, TE; Morris, RG, 2002
)
0.81
" In the two kidney transplant recipients, an increase in tacrolimus AUC(24) occurred following the 20 mg/day dosage of diltiazem (26 and 67%)."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and diltiazem: dose-response relationship in kidney and liver transplant recipients.
Jones, TE; Morris, RG, 2002
)
0.83
" Dosage alterations ofrenally eliminated drugs may be required for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index."( Evaluation of renal function in transplant patients on tacrolimus therapy.
Agarwala, S; Burckart, G; Chakrabarti, P; Culligan, E; Jain, A; McCauley, J; Shapiro, R; Venkataramanan, R, 2002
)
0.56
"Between-subject variability in dose-adjusted concentrations during dosing interval varied from 38."( The impact of ethnic miscegenation on tacrolimus clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring.
da Silva Moreira, SR; Felipe, CR; Garcia, R; Machado, PG; Pestana, JO; Silva, HT, 2002
)
0.59
" Therapeutic drug monitoring to guide dosage adjustments of tacrolimus is an efficient tool to manage drug interactions."( Mechanisms of clinically relevant drug interactions associated with tacrolimus.
Benet, LZ; Christians, U; Jacobsen, W; Lampen, A, 2002
)
0.79
" Blood and urine probes were always drawn immediately before morning dosage of immunosuppressants."( Interaction of the endothelin system and calcineurin inhibitors after kidney transplantation.
Bachert, D; Diehr, P; Fritsche, L; Hocher, B; Neumayer, HH; Slowinski, T; Subkowski, T, 2002
)
0.31
" Based on our finding of a double peak in the dose-response for FK506, it is hypothesized that at least two mechanisms of action (perhaps corresponding to distinct functional binding sites) are evoked at different concentrations of the drug to accelerate nerve regeneration."( Bimodal dose-dependence of FK506 on the rate of axonal regeneration in mouse peripheral nerve.
Ceballos, D; Gold, BG; Navarro, X; Udina, E; Verdú, E, 2002
)
0.31
"This study compared an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) technique for measurement of tacrolimus concentrations in adult kidney and liver transplant recipients, and investigated how assay choice influenced pharmacokinetic parameter estimates and drug dosage decisions."( Comparison of an ELISA and an LC/MS/MS method for measuring tacrolimus concentrations and making dosage decisions in transplant recipients.
Staatz, CE; Taylor, PJ; Tett, SE, 2002
)
0.75
" The newest drugs to reach clinical evaluation, sirolimus and everolimus, have been studied in the context of concentration-controlled dosing and there is a good rationale for their measurement."( Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs in kidney transplantation.
Holt, DW, 2002
)
0.31
"Although used for more than 20 years, optimal dosing strategies of most immunosuppressants have never been determined."( Tacrolimus in cardiac transplantation: efficacy and safety of a novel dosing protocol.
Baran, DA; Chan, M; Cheng, J; Correa, R; Courtney, MC; Fallon, JT; Galin, I; Gass, AL; Lansman, SL; Sandler, D; Segura, L; Spielvogel, D, 2002
)
1.76
" A novel dosing scheme was evaluated to establish the safety and efficacy of this approach."( Tacrolimus in cardiac transplantation: efficacy and safety of a novel dosing protocol.
Baran, DA; Chan, M; Cheng, J; Correa, R; Courtney, MC; Fallon, JT; Galin, I; Gass, AL; Lansman, SL; Sandler, D; Segura, L; Spielvogel, D, 2002
)
1.76
"It was shown that this conservative initial dosing approach, which guarantees renal safety, is not associated with an increased risk of allograft rejection."( Tacrolimus in cardiac transplantation: efficacy and safety of a novel dosing protocol.
Baran, DA; Chan, M; Cheng, J; Correa, R; Courtney, MC; Fallon, JT; Galin, I; Gass, AL; Lansman, SL; Sandler, D; Segura, L; Spielvogel, D, 2002
)
1.76
" FK506 is effective in the treatment of refractory colitis with per oral dosing being equivalent to intravenous administration."( Response of refractory colitis to intravenous or oral tacrolimus (FK506).
Bruening, A; Fellermann, K; Herrlinger, KR; Homann, N; Ludwig, D; Stange, EF; Tanko, Z; Witthoeft, T, 2002
)
0.56
" An understanding of factors that influence the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus may assist in drug dosage decisions."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult kidney transplant recipients.
Staatz, CE; Taylor, PJ; Tett, SE; Willis, C, 2002
)
0.84
" Besides eviction of food allergens, eight children were switched from tacrolimus to cyclosporine, whereas tacrolimus dosage was decreased in four."( Angioedema in pediatric liver transplant recipients under tacrolimus immunosuppression.
Bernard, O; Debray, D; Frauger, E; Habes, D; Lykavieris, P, 2003
)
0.8
"Patient outcomes in transplantation would improve if dosing of immunosuppressive agents was individualized."( Toward better outcomes with tacrolimus therapy: population pharmacokinetics and individualized dosage prediction in adult liver transplantation.
Lynch, SV; Staatz, CE; Taylor, PJ; Tett, SE; Willis, C, 2003
)
0.61
" Although parameters like drug toxicity, optimal drug dosage or delayed endothelial healing need to be further evaluated, summarizing the today's clinical experience the strategy of drug-coated stents promises a striking benefit in interventional treatment of coronary lesions."( Drug eluting stents: initial experiences.
Büllesfeld, L; Gerckens, U; Grube, E; Müller, R, 2002
)
0.31
"New databases were added to the Abbottbase PKS (Bayesian dosage prediction) program to incorporate the population pharmacokinetic models developed for tacrolimus."( Bayesian forecasting and prediction of tacrolimus concentrations in pediatric liver and adult renal transplant recipients.
Staatz, CE; Tett, SE; Willis, C, 2003
)
0.79
" Comedication with CsA increased MMF dosage requirements compared with children on Tac therapy."( Mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
Adams, JE; Aw, MM; Brown, NW; Dhawan, A; Gonde, CE; Heaton, ND; Itsuka, T; Mieli-Vergani, G; Tredger, JM, 2003
)
0.32
" The dosage of tacrolimus was adjusted to keep a whole blood tacrolimus level of 5-10 ng/ml."( Tacrolimus in resistant primary membranous nephropathy--a report of 3 cases.
Lai, FM; Leung, CB; Li, PK; Szeto, CC, 2003
)
2.11
"Insight into the mechanisms of organ engraftment and acquired tolerance has made it possible to facilitate these mechanisms, by tailoring the timing and dosage of immunosuppression in accordance with two therapeutic principles: recipient pretreatment, and minimum use of post-transplant immunosuppression."( Tolerogenic immunosuppression for organ transplantation.
Abu-Elmagd, K; Bond, G; Corry, RJ; Demetris, AJ; Eghtesad, B; Fontes, P; Fung, JJ; Gayowski, T; Gray, EA; Jordan, ML; Marcos, A; Murase, N; Nalesnik, MA; Potdar, S; Randhawa, P; Scantlebury, VP; Shapiro, R; Starzl, TE; Trucco, M; Woodward, J; Wu, T; Zeevi, A, 2003
)
0.32
" The pharmacokinetic data accumulated on sirolimus have been a key element in formulating guidelines on dosing with this drug, both when used in combination with cyclosporine and when used after cyclosporine withdrawal."( Therapeutic monitoring of sirolimus: its contribution to optimal prescription.
Denny, K; Holt, DW; Johnston, A; Lee, TD, 2003
)
0.32
"To report the first case of tacrolimus measurement in human milk following maternal dosing in a woman who breast-fed while taking the medication."( Milk transfer and neonatal safety of tacrolimus.
French, AE; Koren, G; Soldin, OP; Soldin, SJ, 2003
)
0.89
" Most liver transplantation centers reduce the dosage of steroids and eventually withdraw them after various time intervals."( Steroid-free immunosuppression during and after liver transplantation--a 3-yr follow-up report.
Aerts, R; Fevery, J; Koshiba, T; Lauwers, P; Nevens, F; Pirenne, J; Roskams, T; Schetz, M; Van Gelder, F; Verhaegen, M, 2003
)
0.32
" As dosage increased, the rejection could not be prevented and the damage to liver and kidney could be induced."( [Combined immunosuppression of FK506 and RS-61443 in rat limb allotransplantation].
Chen, ZB; Hong, GX; Huang, QS; Kang, H; Wang, FB; Weng, YX, 2003
)
0.32
" It is often assumed that the diverse dosing contributes to the observed pharmacokinetic differences between the two drugs."( Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and cyclosporine at equivalent molecular doses.
Højskov, C; Jørgensen, KA; Karamperis, N; Pedersen, AR; Poulsen, JH; Povlsen, JV, 2003
)
0.59
" The purpose of this study was to characterize the dose-dependent effects of FK506 on T-cell proliferation, and establish a subimmunosuppressive dosing regimen for FK-506 in mice."( Use of mixed lymphocyte reaction to identify subimmunosuppressive FK-506 levels in mice.
Brenner, MJ; Ellis, RA; Hunter, DA; Mackinnon, SE; Myckatyn, TM, 2003
)
0.32
" This paper describes previous work on the individualized dosing of tacrolimus, including patients who are maintained on monotherapy after heart transplantation with tacrolimus alone."( "One size fits all": immunosuppression in cardiac transplantation.
Baran, DA; Galin, ID, 2003
)
0.55
" Because of the skin's high degree of immunogenicity, until recently it was widely assumed that the dosage of immunosuppressive drugs required to prevent rejection was too high to be used safely in the clinical setting."( Formation of synapses between dendritic cells and lymphocytes in skin lymph in an allogeneic reaction.
Galkowska, H; Mijal, J; Olszewski, WL, 2002
)
0.31
" Tacrolimus dosage was modified to maintain a target blood concentration of 5 to 10 ng/mL."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus after multidose oral administration and efficacy in the prevention of allograft rejection in cats with renal transplants.
Craigmill, AL; Gregory, CR; Griffey, SM; Jackson, J; Kyles, AE; Stanley, SD, 2003
)
1.55
"Interindividual variability in dosage requirements of the calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppressive agents cyclosporine and tacrolimus after liver transplantation may result from differences in the CYP3A activity of the liver graft."( Relationship between postoperative erythromycin breath test and early morbidity in liver transplant recipients.
Dalhoff, K; Kirkegaard, P; Rasmussen, A; Schmidt, LE, 2003
)
0.53
" Whether ERMBT results may be used to individualize dosage of calcineurin inhibitors needs to be explored."( Relationship between postoperative erythromycin breath test and early morbidity in liver transplant recipients.
Dalhoff, K; Kirkegaard, P; Rasmussen, A; Schmidt, LE, 2003
)
0.32
" Our primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy and optimal dosing of tacrolimus in preventing rejection, using an established rat model of laryngeal transplantation."( Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil provide effective immunosuppression in rat laryngeal transplantation.
Dan, O; Fritz, M; Nelson, M; Strome, M; Worley, S, 2003
)
1.99
"A dosage efficacy study with 10 experimental arms was conducted."( Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil provide effective immunosuppression in rat laryngeal transplantation.
Dan, O; Fritz, M; Nelson, M; Strome, M; Worley, S, 2003
)
1.76
" Dosage groups were compared on rejection score using Wilcoxon's rank sum test and the Jonckheere-Terpstra test for trend."( Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil provide effective immunosuppression in rat laryngeal transplantation.
Dan, O; Fritz, M; Nelson, M; Strome, M; Worley, S, 2003
)
1.76
" Great caution is required in the management of tacrolimus dosage when Kaletra is introduced or withdrawn in HIV-positive patients after liver transplantation, particularly in the presence of hepatic dysfunction."( Effect of coadministered lopinavir and ritonavir (Kaletra) on tacrolimus blood concentration in liver transplantation patients.
Eghtesad, B; Fung, JJ; Jain, AB; Marcos, A; Rafail, AB; Ragni, M; Shapiro, R; Venkataramanan, R, 2003
)
0.82
" Renal toxicity is proportional to previous impairment of renal function, primary renal disease (FSGS vs MCD) dosage >5."( Treatment of idiopathic nephrosis by immunophillin modulation.
Meyrier, A, 2003
)
0.32
"05) but only in the 2-g MMF dosing group."( Long-term changes in mycophenolic acid exposure in combination with tacrolimus and corticosteroids are dose dependent and not reflected by trough plasma concentration: a prospective study in 100 de novo renal allograft recipients.
Claes, K; Coosemans, W; Evenepoel, P; Kuypers, DR; Maes, B; Pirenne, J; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2003
)
0.55
" MMF was added gradually while simultaneously reducing the dosage of CI."( Effectiveness and safety of mycophenolate mofetil as monotherapy in liver transplantation.
Cuervas-Mons, V; Gómez, A; Herreros, A; Jimenez, M; Lopez-Monclus, J; Moreno, JM; Navarrete, E; Revilla, J; Rubio, E; Sánchez Turrión, V, 2003
)
0.32
" The treatment for acidosis and hyperkalaemia should be started as soon as RTA is diagnosed, and the dosage of FK506 should also be reduced if possible."( Renal tubular acidosis secondary to FK506 in living donor liver transplantation: a case report.
Maehara, Y; Ogita, K; Shimada, M; Soejima, Y; Suehiro, T; Suita, S; Taguchi, T; Takada, N, 2003
)
0.32
" Steroid dosage, tacrolimus dosage, tacrolimus trough concentration (C0) and tacrolimus concentration/dose ratio [C0 divided by the 24 h dosage (mg/kg)] were assessed for each dosage group after 1 and 3 months of tacrolimus treatment."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between corticosteroids and tacrolimus after renal transplantation.
Anglicheau, D; Beaune, P; Cassinat, B; Flamant, M; Legendre, C; Martinez, F; Schlageter, MH; Thervet, E, 2003
)
0.9
" At 1 and 3 months, the tacrolimus doses and concentration/dose ratios differed significantly in the three steroid dosage groups."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between corticosteroids and tacrolimus after renal transplantation.
Anglicheau, D; Beaune, P; Cassinat, B; Flamant, M; Legendre, C; Martinez, F; Schlageter, MH; Thervet, E, 2003
)
0.87
" The higher the steroid dosage, the higher the dosage of tacrolimus needed to achieve target trough levels in these patients."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between corticosteroids and tacrolimus after renal transplantation.
Anglicheau, D; Beaune, P; Cassinat, B; Flamant, M; Legendre, C; Martinez, F; Schlageter, MH; Thervet, E, 2003
)
0.81
"1 mm/hour) despite treatment for >/=1 month with a stable, maximally tolerated dosage of oral MTX (( Tacrolimus in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a six-month, open-label study.
Borton, MA; Habros, JS; Kaine, JL; Kolba, KS; Kremer, JM; Mekki, QA; Mengle-Gaw, LJ; Schwartz, BD; Wisemandle, W, 2003
)
1.95
" Tacrolimus dosing was based on C0 not AUC."( Tacrolimus monitoring by simplified sparse sampling under the concentration time curve.
Balbontin, FG; Belitsky, P; Fraser, A; Kiberd, B; Lawen, J; Singh, D; Squires, J, 2003
)
2.67
" The serum may alter results of dose-response curves, and thus autologous serum may introduce an uncontrolled variable when different species are being compared in vitro."( FK506 and rapamycin: differential sensitivity of human, baboon, cynomolgus monkey, dog and pig lymphocytes.
Calne, RY; Metcalfe, S; Svvennsen, R, 1992
)
0.28
" Energy-rich phosphates are near normal in the high dosage immunosuppression groups but show a significant reduction in the low dosage groups."( Prevention of cardiac allograft rejection by FK506 and rapamycin: assessment by histology and nuclear magnetic resonance.
Altermatt, HJ; Althaus, U; Billingham, M; Galdikas, J; Lazeyras, F; Morris, R; Schaffner, T; Tschopp, A; Walpoth, B, 1992
)
0.28
" This expanded pilot series discusses immunosuppression dosing modification to further minimize drug toxicity without sacrificing regimen efficacy."( Continued superior outcomes with modification and lengthened follow-up of a steroid-avoidance pilot with extended daclizumab induction in pediatric renal transplantation.
Alexander, SR; Millan, M; Salvatierra, O; Sarwal, MM; Satterwhite, T; Vidhun, JR, 2003
)
0.32
" Leukopenia, anemia, and allograft nephrotoxicity were addressed by solely decreasing MMF and tacrolimus dosing and/or by replacing MMF with sirolimus, without increasing acute rejection."( Continued superior outcomes with modification and lengthened follow-up of a steroid-avoidance pilot with extended daclizumab induction in pediatric renal transplantation.
Alexander, SR; Millan, M; Salvatierra, O; Sarwal, MM; Satterwhite, T; Vidhun, JR, 2003
)
0.54
" In both cases the dosage reduction did not result in improvement of symptoms, which completely disappeared after modification of the immunosuppressive regimen from tacrolimus to cyclosporine."( Severe neurotoxicity in tacrolimus-treated living kidney transplantation in two cases.
Cappello, D; Macarone, M; Puliatti, C; Valvo, M; Veroux, M; Veroux, P, 2003
)
0.82
" Rats were euthanized at three time points (25, 30, and 35 days), to fully investigate the effects of different FK506 dosing regimens on neuroregeneration."( Dose-dependent effects of FK506 on neuroregeneration in a rat model.
Hunter, DA; Lowe, JB; Mackinnon, SE; Sen, SK; Sobol, JB; Yang, RK, 2003
)
0.32
" John's wort dosing phase (300 mg orally three times daily)."( Effects of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.
Akhtar, S; Chen, YL; Hebert, MF; Larson, AM; Park, JM, 2004
)
0.57
" Adjustment to the dose or dosing interval is not required for patients treated with tacrolimus during CVVHD."( Influence of continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients with small-for-size grafts.
Furukawa, H; Kishino, S; Miyazaki, K; Shimamura, T; Sugawara, M; Takekuma, Y; Todo, S, 2003
)
0.77
" In lung transplant recipients, because of the high potential for acute and chronic allograft rejection, optimal selection, dosage and delivery of immunosuppressive medications is critical."( Sublingual tacrolimus for immunosuppression in lung transplantation: a potentially important therapeutic option in cystic fibrosis.
Palmer, SM; Reams, BD, 2002
)
0.7
" This syndrome appeared soon after institution of or increase in sirolimus dosage and improved only after this medication was discontinued."( Thrombotic microangiopathy associated with combined sirolimus and tacrolimus immunosuppression after intestinal transplantation.
Fishbein, TM; Florman, SS; Gondolesi, GE; Grosskreutz, C; Kaufman, SS; Paramesh, AS; Sharma, S, 2004
)
0.56
"This 1-year interim analysis indicates that a decreasing dosage of tacrolimus with either adjunctive sirolimus or MMF may optimize future graft survival versus a less favorable outcome using a similar algorithm with CsA and sirolimus."( A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year.
Burke, GW; Ciancio, G; Gaynor, JJ; Kupin, W; Mattiazzi, A; Miller, J; Nicolas, M; Rosen, A; Roth, D; Ruiz, P, 2004
)
0.84
"This 1-year interim analysis of a long-term, prospective, randomized renal-transplant study indicates that decreasing maintenance dosage of Tacro with adjunctive Siro or MMF appears to point to improved long-term function, with reasonably few adverse events."( A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus/sirolimus versus tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL)/sirolimus in renal transplantation. II. Survival, function, and protocol compliance at 1 year.
Burke, GW; Ciancio, G; Gaynor, JJ; Kupin, W; Mattiazzi, A; Miller, J; Nicolas, M; Rosen, A; Roth, D; Ruiz, P, 2004
)
0.61
" The objective of this study was to confirm the influence of these polymorphisms on tacrolimus dosing in adult lung transplant patients."( Tacrolimus dosing in adult lung transplant patients is related to cytochrome P4503A5 gene polymorphism.
Burckart, GJ; Dauber, J; Grgurich, W; Griffith, BP; Iacono, A; Lamba, J; McCurry, K; McDade, K; Ristich, J; Schuetz, E; Webber, S; Zaldonis, D; Zeevi, A; Zhang, J; Zheng, H, 2004
)
1.99
" The optimal dosage appears to be 3 mg/day in terms of efficacy and safety."( Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (FK506) in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled dose-finding study.
Abe, T; Hara, M; Hashimoto, H; Irimajiri, S; Kondo, H; Sugawara, S; Uchida, S, 2004
)
0.63
" Tacrolimus levels and dosage requirements were compared before and during azole therapy."( Tacrolimus dosage requirements after initiation of azole antifungal therapy in pediatric thoracic organ transplantation.
Boyle, GJ; Gandhi, S; Kurland, G; Law, YM; Mahnke, CB; Michaels, M; Miller, SA; Pigula, FA; Sutton, RM; Venkataramanan, R; Webber, SA, 2003
)
2.67
"Trough concentrations of tacrolimus should be monitored closely for optimizing the dosage regimen in patients receiving concomitant lansoprazole."( Lansoprazole-tacrolimus interaction in Japanese transplant recipient with CYP2C19 polymorphism.
Inui, K; Ito, N; Motohashi, H; Ogawa, O; Okuda, M; Takahashi, K; Yamamoto, S; Yonezawa, A, 2004
)
1
" Steady-state tacrolimus pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated on two occasions in an open-label, three-arm, two-period sequential study: twice daily dosing (Phase I) and once daily dosing (Phase II)."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: twice daily versus once daily dosing.
Brennan, DC; Hardinger, KL; Koch, MJ; Miller, BW; Park, JM; Schnitzler, MA, 2004
)
1.01
" Statistical analysis showed that the C2 correlated with the area under the time-blood concentration curve of cyclosporine for 0 to 4 hours after dosing (R=0."( Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine microemulsion therapy in liver transplant recipients.
Hashikura, Y; Ikegami, T; Katsuyama, Y; Kawasaki, S; Miyagawa, S; Nakazawa, Y; Ogino, S; Terada, M; Urata, K, 2004
)
0.67
" The tacrolimus dosage need not be reduced unless trough levels are too high."( Tacrolimus pain syndrome in renal transplant patients: report of two cases.
Albano, L; Bendini, C; Blaimont, A; Cassuto, E; Franco, M; Jaeger, P, 2004
)
2.28
" The daily dosage of tacrolimus was modified mainly on the basis of trough levels."( Tacrolimus therapy according to mucosal MDR1 levels in small-bowel transplant recipients.
Fujimoto, Y; Goto, M; Inui, K; Masuda, S; Tanaka, K; Uemoto, S, 2004
)
2.09
" In mice with syngeneic islet transplantations, a single administration of 30 mg/kg of tacrolimus inhibited insulin secretion, whereas a single administration of an equal dosage of M-FK did not."( Biodegradable microsphere-loaded tacrolimus enhanced the effect on mice islet allograft and reduced the adverse effect on insulin secretion.
Fujino, M; Funeshima, N; Hara, Y; Kawashima, Y; Kitazawa, Y; Li, XK; Lu, FZ; Miyamoto, Y; Takenaka, H; Uno, T; Wang, Q; Yamamoto, H, 2004
)
0.83
" The half-life was estimated using the data points during the terminal disposition phase and area under the concentration (AUC) time curve was calculated within a dosing interval using the trapezoidal method."( Pharmacokinetics of sirolimus and tacrolimus in pediatric transplant patients.
Holt, DW; McGhee, W; Reyes, J; Schubert, M; Shaw, LM; Sindhi, R; Venkataramanan, R; Webber, S, 2004
)
0.6
" Her tacrolimus dosage was increased from 7 to 28 mg twice/day, and ketoconazole therapy was added; however, her tacrolimus concentration remained undetectable."( Tacrolimus toxicity associated with concomitant metoclopramide therapy.
Callahan, BL; Park, JM; Prescott, WA, 2004
)
2.28
" In addition, a significant curvilinear dose-response relationship was found between ACEI dose and HCT."( Pharmacoepidemiology of anemia in kidney transplant recipients.
Chandraker, A; Gabardi, S; Kewalramani, R; Rutstein, M; Vonvisger, T; Winkelmayer, WC, 2004
)
0.32
" Cumulative steroid dosage early after OLT is shown to be important, presumably by decreasing bone formation rates."( Immunosuppressive and postoperative effects of orthotopic liver transplantation on bone metabolism.
Clarke, BL; Guichelaar, MM; Hay, JE; Malinchoc, M; Sibonga, J, 2004
)
0.32
" This study was designed to determine the optimal dosage combinations of tacrolimus and sirolimus in a high-risk cadaveric renal transplant population."( Observations regarding the use of sirolimus and tacrolimus in high-risk cadaveric renal transplantation.
Egidi, MF; Fisher, JS; Gaber, AO; Gaber, LW; Lo, A; Nazakatgoo, N; Shokouh-Amiri, MH, 2004
)
0.81
" These preliminary results provide evidence that sirolimus should not be added to tacrolimus without dosage adjustments."( Observations regarding the use of sirolimus and tacrolimus in high-risk cadaveric renal transplantation.
Egidi, MF; Fisher, JS; Gaber, AO; Gaber, LW; Lo, A; Nazakatgoo, N; Shokouh-Amiri, MH, 2004
)
0.8
"The results suggest that analysis of lymphocyte function in whole blood may be useful to optimize dosing of SRL in combination with CsA or TRL and that PD monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs will enhance the value of PK monitoring."( Synergistic effects of sirolimus with cyclosporine and tacrolimus: analysis of immunosuppression on lymphocyte proliferation and activation in rat whole blood.
Armstrong, VW; Barten, MJ; Boeger, M; Dhein, S; Gummert, JF; Mohr, FW; Oellerich, M; Shipkova, M; Streit, F; Tarnok, A, 2004
)
0.57
" The recipient rats were randomly divided into 5 groups, receiving peribulbar SEB injection of a dosage of 30, 60, 90 or 120 microg/kg 7 days before and after operations."( [The role of superantigen SEB-induced immunotolerance in the immune privileged site].
Chen, Y; He, QH; Jie, Y; Pan, ZQ; Peng, H; Wu, YY; Xu, L; Zhang, WH, 2003
)
0.32
" This study assesses the relationship between concentration-controlled dosing during the early period after transplantation, the time to achieve target concentrations and genotype in 178 renal transplant recipients (CYP3AP1*1/*3 or *1/*1: n = 53, CYP3AP1*3/*3: n = 125)."( The influence of pharmacogenetics on the time to achieve target tacrolimus concentrations after kidney transplantation.
Carter, ND; Fredericks, S; Goldberg, L; Holt, DW; Johnston, A; MacPhee, IA; Syrris, P; Tai, T, 2004
)
0.56
"A prospective evaluation was performed to study the potential benefits of the use of interleukin-2 receptor antibody (IL-2Rab) in the induction therapy with early elimination of steroid and reduction of tacrolimus dosage in liver transplant recipients among whom 94% had chronic hepatitis B infection."( Interleukin-2 receptor antibody (basiliximab) for immunosuppressive induction therapy after liver transplantation: a protocol with early elimination of steroids and reduction of tacrolimus dosage.
Chan, SC; Fan, ST; Lai, CL; Liu, CL; Lo, CM; Ng, IO; Wong, J, 2004
)
0.7
"Instantaneous intra-renal transplant hemodynamics were assessed in 22 patients using quantitative cineloop color Doppler imaging after dosing with microemulsion cyclosporine (CSA) or tacrolimus (TAC)."( Oral cyclosporine but not tacrolimus reduces renal transplant blood flow.
Bonovas, G; Chapman, JR; Gruenewald, SM; Nankivell, BJ, 2004
)
0.82
"CSA dosing resulted in renal hypoperfusion, with a mean relative reduction of 43%+/-20% (range 22-76%) in maximal fractional area (MFA) of color pixels to nadir, compared to baseline."( Oral cyclosporine but not tacrolimus reduces renal transplant blood flow.
Bonovas, G; Chapman, JR; Gruenewald, SM; Nankivell, BJ, 2004
)
0.62
" In conclusion, this study gives information about the TDM practice in institutional clinical laboratory and also indicates the importance of critical information such as sampling time for individual decision making in dosage regiment."( Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs in Marmara University Hospital.
Akc, A; Berkman, K; Demir, D; Gören, MZ; ISkender, E; Karaalp, A; Oktay, S; Onat, F; Ozkaynakç, A; Ozyurt, H; Yananl, HR, 2004
)
0.32
" This article reviews the use of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, with emphasis on pharmacology, results in controlled clinical trials, and safety, and issues related to dosing and toxicity monitoring."( Cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.
Egan, LJ; Loftus, CG; Sandborn, WJ, 2004
)
0.94
" From March 1999 to May 2001, a total of 297 SKPT patients were enrolled into a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative trial of two daclizumab dosing strategies versus no-antibody induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids in SKPT recipients."( Does surgical technique influence outcomes after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation?
Alloway, RR; Hodge, EE; Lo, A; Stratta, RJ, 2004
)
0.51
" Research and development programs are underway for a new modified release dosage form of tacrolimus (MR-4), a new analog of leflunomide (FK 778), and several novel compounds (PG 490-88, AGI 1096) in collaboration with other companies."( New drugs to improve transplant outcomes.
First, MR; Fitzsimmons, WE, 2004
)
0.54
" To avoid disruption of therapy, measurements were made at 2-h intervals over an 8-h period during normal dosing regimens."( A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and microemulsified cyclosporin in paediatric renal transplant recipients.
Acott, PD; Crocker, JF; McLellan, H; Renton, KW, 2004
)
0.59
" Area under the curve (AUC) for tacrolimus remained relatively constant in each 2-h period of the dosage interval compared with the AUC for cyclosporin, which varied by over twofold in the same time period."( A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and microemulsified cyclosporin in paediatric renal transplant recipients.
Acott, PD; Crocker, JF; McLellan, H; Renton, KW, 2004
)
0.87
" Dosage and target concentration recommendations for tacrolimus vary from centre to centre, and large pharmacokinetic variability makes it difficult to predict what concentration will be achieved with a particular dose or dosage change."( Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation.
Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2004
)
0.83
" Because this dose resulted in low area-under-the-curve (AUC) in our infant population, we retrospectively analyzed all available pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles in pediatric renal transplant patients on MMF plus Tac therapy to propose appropriate MMF dosing in pediatric patients of all ages."( Age-dependency of mycophenolate mofetil dosing in combination with tacrolimus after pediatric renal transplantation.
Berard, R; Filler, G; Foster, J; Lepage, N; Mai, I, 2004
)
0.56
" The dosing requirement decreased from 500 mg/m2 BID in 2-year-old patients to 250 mg/m2 in adolescents."( Age-dependency of mycophenolate mofetil dosing in combination with tacrolimus after pediatric renal transplantation.
Berard, R; Filler, G; Foster, J; Lepage, N; Mai, I, 2004
)
0.56
" It may be necessary to take Hct into consideration in the FK506 dosing regimen, especially when the Hct is low."( Effect of hematocrit on pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult living donor liver transplant recipients.
Hori, S; Iga, T; Kusama, M; Makuuchi, M; Minematsu, T; Ohtani, H; Sato, H; Sawada, Y; Sugawara, Y; Sugiyama, E; Takayama, T; Yamada, Y, 2004
)
0.58
" To fully benefit from this promising new drug, FK778 dosing will be optimized in subsequent studies."( The effects of FK778 in combination with tacrolimus and steroids: a phase II multicenter study in renal transplant patients.
Chang, R; Charpentier, B; Grinyó, JM; Jurewicz, A; Klinger, M; Kreis, H; Mourad, G; Neuhaus, P; Paczek, L; Paul, LC; Rostaing, L; Short, C; Squifflet, JP; van Hooff, JP; Vanrenterghem, Y; Wlodarczyk, Z, 2004
)
0.59
" The incidence of acute allograft rejection (AR), blood concentration and dosage of FK506, and the liver graft function were observed in the 30 days after liver transplantation and compared with the results documented in literatures."( [Clinical study of three-dose regimen of Zenapax in orthotopic liver transplantation].
Deng, WF; He, G; Yu, LX, 2004
)
0.32
" The tacrolimus dosage was adjusted to trough levels in the target range of 10-15 microg/L during the first 3 mo and 5-10 microg/L thereafter."( Initial steroid-free immunosuppression after liver transplantation in recipients with hepatitis C virus related cirrhosis.
Braun, F; Ramadori, G; Ringe, B; Sattler, B; Wietzke-Braun, P, 2004
)
0.84
"In an attempt to reduce both initial and long-term (nephrotoxic) calcineurin inhibitor maintenance dosage and totally eliminate maintenance corticosteroids, alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) was used as induction therapy in first cadaver and non-HLA-identical living donor renal transplantation."( The use of Campath-1H as induction therapy in renal transplantation: preliminary results.
Burke, GW; Carreno, MR; Ciancio, G; Esquenazi, V; Gaynor, JJ; Kupin, W; Mattiazzi, A; Miller, J; Roohipour, R; Rosen, A; Roth, D; Ruiz, P; Tzakis, AG, 2004
)
0.32
" Maintenance target 12-hr tacrolimus trough levels of 5 to 7 ng/mL were operational from the outset as well as (reduced) mycophenolate mofetil dosage of 500 mg twice daily."( The use of Campath-1H as induction therapy in renal transplantation: preliminary results.
Burke, GW; Carreno, MR; Ciancio, G; Esquenazi, V; Gaynor, JJ; Kupin, W; Mattiazzi, A; Miller, J; Roohipour, R; Rosen, A; Roth, D; Ruiz, P; Tzakis, AG, 2004
)
0.62
"In an early assessment, the combination of Campath-1H, low dosing of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, and avoidance of maintenance corticosteroid use seems to be safe and effective for kidney transplant recipients."( The use of Campath-1H as induction therapy in renal transplantation: preliminary results.
Burke, GW; Carreno, MR; Ciancio, G; Esquenazi, V; Gaynor, JJ; Kupin, W; Mattiazzi, A; Miller, J; Roohipour, R; Rosen, A; Roth, D; Ruiz, P; Tzakis, AG, 2004
)
0.56
" The MG activities of daily living (MGADL) scores and the dosage of prednisolone (PSL) were assessed at baseline and 4 months later."( Low-dose tacrolimus treatment in thymectomised and steroid-dependent myasthenia gravis.
Fukutake, T; Hattori, T; Kawaguchi, N; Munakata, S; Nemoto, Y; Yoshiyama, Y, 2004
)
0.74
"01) as well as the average dosage of PSL reducing from 31."( Low-dose tacrolimus treatment in thymectomised and steroid-dependent myasthenia gravis.
Fukutake, T; Hattori, T; Kawaguchi, N; Munakata, S; Nemoto, Y; Yoshiyama, Y, 2004
)
0.74
"5 microM) shifted the dose-response curve of ryanodine- or caffeine-induced 45Ca2+ release from the vesicles to the left."( Elucidation of the ryanodine-sensitive Ca2+ release mechanism of rat pancreatic acinar cells: modulation by cyclic ADP-ribose and FK506.
Ozawa, T, 2004
)
0.32
" Percutaneous adventitial delivery is safe, feasible, and provides consistent dosing for complete treatment of a vascular territory."( Novel percutaneous adventitial drug delivery system for regional vascular treatment.
Baluom, M; Benet, LZ; Ikeno, F; Kaneda, H; Lyons, J; Rezaee, M, 2004
)
0.32
" Because of poor solubility in water, the conventional intravenous dosage forms of tacrolimus contain surfactants such as cremophor EL (BASF Wyandotte Co."( Preparation of highly water soluble tacrolimus derivatives: poly(ethylene glycol) esters as potential prodrugs.
Cho, H; Chung, Y, 2004
)
0.82
" We investigated the influence of dosing time on the neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and immunosuppressive effect of tacrolimus in rats."( Tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity is ameliorated by administration in the dark phase in rats.
Kataoka, Y; Oishi, R; Yamauchi, A, 2004
)
1.98
" Intermittent dosing with potent topical steroids and/or combination therapy with steroid and tacrolimus have been frequently used in the daily management of AD to overcome the problems accompanying the long term use of steroids."( Intermittent topical corticosteroid/tacrolimus sequential therapy improves lichenification and chronic papules more efficiently than intermittent topical corticosteroid/emollient sequential therapy in patients with atopic dermatitis.
Fukagawa, S; Furue, M; Koga, T; Nakahara, T; Uchi, H, 2004
)
0.82
" A jackknife procedure was used to evaluate the predictive performance of the model, and this demonstrated that collecting a sample at 5 hours after dosing could be considered as the optimal sampling time for predicting AUC(0-6)."( Sampling times for monitoring tacrolimus in stable adult liver transplant recipients.
Dansirikul, C; Duffull, SB; Lynch, SV; Staatz, CE; Taylor, PJ; Tett, SE, 2004
)
0.61
" Evolving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive protocols for renal transplantation over the last 10 years, particularly in terms of tacrolimus dosing and corticosteroid elimination, has led to a reduction in PTDM-related morbidity without compromising efficacy."( Post-transplant diabetes mellitus: the last 10 years with tacrolimus.
Bäckman, LA, 2004
)
0.97
" In an attempt to reduce the dosage and toxicity of the current immunosuppressive regimens, we have now tested the ability of GA, combined with low doses of cyclosporin (CyA) or tacrolimus (FK506), to suppress the rejection of mismatched allografts across major histocompatibility barriers."( Combined treatment of glatiramer acetate and low doses of immunosuppressive drugs is effective in the prevention of graft rejection.
Aharoni, R; Arnon, R; Sela, M; Yussim, A, 2005
)
0.52
"To review the literature relating to immunosuppressant drug measurement as performed in therapeutic drug monitoring laboratories associated with transplantation centers and consider whether the assay methods widely used for patient dosage management achieve acceptable quality criteria in the context of other sources of variability with these drugs."( Immunosuppressant drug monitoring: is the laboratory meeting clinical expectations?
Morris, RG, 2005
)
0.33
"Emphasis was placed on the literature relating to the quality of immunosuppressant drug assays, their limitations, and evidence of clinical benefit in dosage individualization."( Immunosuppressant drug monitoring: is the laboratory meeting clinical expectations?
Morris, RG, 2005
)
0.33
"In many cases, clinical laboratories fail to meet the reasonable clinical expectations required for interpretation of immunosuppressant drug assay results as an adjunct to optimal dosage individualization and patient care."( Immunosuppressant drug monitoring: is the laboratory meeting clinical expectations?
Morris, RG, 2005
)
0.33
" The optimal FK778 dosage was determined to be 20 mg/kg per day, because adverse effects (weight loss and intestinal bleeding) occurred at 30 mg/kg per day."( FK778 and FK506 combination therapy to control acute rejection after rat liver allotransplantation.
Hirohashi, K; Ikeda, K; Kubo, S; Minamiyama, Y; Okuda, T; Suehiro, S; Takemura, S; Tanaka, H; Yamamoto, S; Yamasaki, K, 2004
)
0.32
" Complications of high AZA dosing make dose escalation potentially problematic."( Utility of azathioprine metabolite measurements in post-transplant recurrent autoimmune and immune-mediated hepatitis.
Emre, SH; Rumbo, C; Shneider, BL, 2004
)
0.32
" In vivo LFv2IRE transduction of insulin target tissues followed by AP20187 dosing may represent a therapeutic strategy to be tested in animal models of insulin resistance due to insulin receptor deficiency or of type I diabetes."( Pharmacological regulation of the insulin receptor signaling pathway mimics insulin action in cells transduced with viral vectors.
Auricchio, A; Beguinot, F; Cotugno, G; Formisano, P; Linher, K; Pollock, R, 2004
)
0.32
" The immunosuppression is as follows: (i) basiliximab (20 mg if body weight >30 kg; 10 mg if < 30 kg) is given pretransplant and at day 4; (ii) tacrolimus (Tac) is administered in order to obtain blood trough levels of 10-20 and 5-10 ng/ml during and after the first 2 months post-transplant, respectively; (iii) steroids are tapered during the first 6 months and then replaced by mycophenolate mofetil (depending on previous rejection episodes, infection status and the result of a routine biopsy) at a dosage of 4-600 mg/m(2) body surface area."( One-year results of basiliximab induction and tacrolimus associated with sequential steroid and MMF treatment in pediatric kidney transplant recipient.
Cardillo, M; Edefonti, A; Ferraresso, M; Ghio, L; Ginevri, F; Montini, G; Murer, L; Perfumo, F; Pietrobon, B; Scalamogna, M; Zacchello, G; Zanon, GF, 2005
)
0.79
" These results indicate that stable kidney and liver transplant recipients can be safely converted from standard Prograf twice daily dosing to the same mg-for-mg daily dose of MR tacrolimus once daily in the morning."( Modified release tacrolimus.
First, MR; Fitzsimmons, WE, 2004
)
0.86
" Future studies should focus on alternative dosing schedules with more aggressive use of adjuvant therapies, including GFs."( Applicability, tolerability and efficacy of preemptive antiviral therapy in hepatitis C-infected patients undergoing liver transplantation.
Ascher, NA; Bollinger, K; Khalili, M; Roberts, JP; Shergill, AK; Straley, S; Terrault, NA, 2005
)
0.33
" The protocol calls for a 10-day pretransplantation conditioning period, starting with one dosage of rituximab and followed by full dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone."( ABO incompatible kidney transplantations without splenectomy, using antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab.
Fehrman, I; Genberg, H; Kumlien, G; Lundgren, T; Sandberg, J; Tydén, G, 2005
)
0.53
" SRL dosing was dependent upon concomitant immunosuppressive therapy."( An open-label, pilot study evaluating the safety and efficacy of converting from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus in established renal allograft recipients with moderate renal insufficiency.
Adler, SH; Cohen, DJ; Jensik, S; Peddi, VR; Pescovitz, M; Pirsch, J; Thistlethwaite, JR; Vincenti, F, 2005
)
0.33
" Therefore, the monitoring of the enterocyte P-glycoprotein level would provide useful information for determining the dosage of tacrolimus immediately after small bowl transplantation."( Transient up-regulation of P-glycoprotein reduces tacrolimus absorption after ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat ileum.
Goto, M; Inui, K; Ito, K; Masuda, S; Okuda, M; Omae, T; Shimomura, M, 2005
)
0.79
" Unfortunately, in clinical practice, monitoring predose trough blood concentrations is often not sufficient for guiding optimal long-term dosing of these drugs."( Immunosuppressive drug monitoring - what to use in clinical practice today to improve renal graft outcome.
Kuypers, DR, 2005
)
0.33
" At the end of the study, eight patients (67%) showed improvement in either MG score or Activities in Daily Living score, and prednisolone dosage could be reduced in seven patients (58%), with a mean reduction ratio of 37%."( Long-term treatment of generalised myasthenia gravis with FK506 (tacrolimus).
Konishi, T; Saida, T; Takamori, M; Yoshiyama, Y, 2005
)
0.57
" Animals tolerated this dosage of Multiglycosidorum tripterygii for 12 weeks after administration."( Efficacy of Multiglycosidorum tripterygii for rat tracheal allografts.
Nakanishi, R; Yasumoto, K, 2005
)
0.33
"There is a paucity of data examining the efficacy of valganciclovir (VGC) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in kidney transplant patients, particularly with regard to utilization of a risk-stratified dosing regimen."( Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with valganciclovir in African-American renal allograft recipients based on donor/recipient serostatus.
Alangaden, GJ; Chandrasekar, P; El-Amm, JM; Garnick, J; Granger, DK; Gruber, SA; Haririan, A; Morawski, K; Sillix, DH; West, MS, 2005
)
0.33
"The genetic polymorphisms in the ABCB1 gene, which encodes for the membrane pump, P-glycoprotein, have been previously demonstrated to have an association with tacrolimus dosing in organ transplant patients."( Sequential analysis of tacrolimus dosing in adult lung transplant patients with ABCB1 haplotypes.
Burckart, GJ; Iacono, A; Lamba, J; McCurry, K; Schuetz, E; Webber, S; Zeevi, A; Zhang, J; Zheng, H, 2005
)
0.84
" After twice daily dosing was stabilized based on clinical judgment, at least 5 days postoperatively, tacrolimus levels were drawn prior to, and 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h after the morning dose."( Effect of age, ethnicity, and glucocorticoid use on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in pediatric renal transplant patients.
Aviles, DH; Kim, JS; Leblanc, PL; Matti Vehaskari, V; Silverstein, DM, 2005
)
0.79
" The serum titer of anti-Ach-receptor antibodies decreased in parallel with clinical improvement due to tacrolimus, and we accordingly reduced the dosage of prednisolone."( Low-dose tacrolimus for two cases of myasthenia gravis with invasive thymoma that relapsed shortly after thymectomy.
Deguchi, K; Ikeda, K; Kuriyama, S; Sasaki, I; Shimamura, M; Takeuchi, H; Touge, T; Tsukaguchi, M; Urai, Y, 2005
)
0.96
" We have suggested that transplantation outcomes can be improved by modifying the timing and dosage of immunosuppression to facilitate natural mechanisms of alloengraftment and acquired tolerance."( Kidney transplantation under minimal immunosuppression after pretransplant lymphoid depletion with Thymoglobulin or Campath.
Bass, DC; Basu, A; Demetris, AJ; Fung, JJ; Girnita, A; Gray, E; Kahn, A; Marcos, A; Metes, D; Murase, N; Ness, R; Randhawa, P; Shapiro, R; Starzl, TE; Tan, H; Zeevi, A, 2005
)
0.33
" Our latest pretreatment/induction conditioning and posttransplantation monotherapy strategy improves graft acceptance and lowers subsequent immunosuppression dosing requirements."( Evolutionary experience with immunosuppression in pediatric intestinal transplantation.
Abu-Elmagd, KM; Bond, GJ; Mazariegos, GV; Reyes, J; Sindhi, R, 2005
)
0.33
" Subsequently, we used this model to apply prospectively AUC-guided dosing of tacrolimus in 15 consecutive renal transplant recipients."( AUC-guided dosing of tacrolimus prevents progressive systemic overexposure in renal transplant recipients.
Cremers, SC; de Fijter, JW; den Hartigh, J; Paul, LC; Rowshani, AT; Schoemaker, RC; Scholten, EM; van Kan, EJ, 2005
)
0.88
" In the AUC-guided dosing cohort the apparent clearance of tacrolimus decreased gradually over time, which was not reflected in corresponding trough levels."( AUC-guided dosing of tacrolimus prevents progressive systemic overexposure in renal transplant recipients.
Cremers, SC; de Fijter, JW; den Hartigh, J; Paul, LC; Rowshani, AT; Schoemaker, RC; Scholten, EM; van Kan, EJ, 2005
)
0.89
" Evaluation of hematologic factors that affect the whole blood concentrations of tacrolimus may be helpful in deciding the dosage of this drug."( Effects of some hematological parameters on whole blood tacrolimus concentration measured by two immunoassay-based analytical methods.
Akaydin, M; Akbas, SH; Caglar, S; Demirbas, A; Ersoy, FF; Gultekin, M; Gurkan, A; Ozdem, S; Senol, Y; Tuncer, M; Yucetin, L, 2005
)
0.8
"Modifications in the timing and dosage of immunosuppression can ameliorate the morbidity and mortality that has prevented widespread use of intestinal transplantation (ITx) in children."( Intestinal transplantation under tacrolimus monotherapy after perioperative lymphoid depletion with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin).
Abu-Elmagd, K; Bond, GJ; Macedo, C; Mazariegos, GV; Murase, N; Peters, J; Reyes, J; Sindhi, R; Starzl, TE, 2005
)
0.61
" Neither the cyclosporine nor the tacrolimus dosage was adjusted for at least 3 days before and during blood sampling for pharmacokinetic profiling."( Effects of calcineurin inhibitors on sirolimus pharmacokinetics during staggered administration in renal transplant recipients.
Chen, KH; Chen, RR; Hu, RH; Huang, JD; Lee, PH; Sun, SW; Tsai, MK; Wu, FL, 2005
)
0.61
" We observed no differences between the two patient groups in terms of their demographic data, renal and liver function, or dosage of sirolimus during the study."( Effects of calcineurin inhibitors on sirolimus pharmacokinetics during staggered administration in renal transplant recipients.
Chen, KH; Chen, RR; Hu, RH; Huang, JD; Lee, PH; Sun, SW; Tsai, MK; Wu, FL, 2005
)
0.33
" The goal of the study was to investigate the effect of a reduction of calcineurin inhibitor dosage with the concomitant introduction of mycophenolate mofetil on both renal function and cardiac allograft function."( Improvement of renal function in pediatric heart transplant recipients treated with low-dose calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil.
Boyer, O; Dechaux, M; Gubler, MC; Le Bidois, J; Niaudet, P, 2005
)
0.33
"The reduction of calcineurin inhibitor dosage and replacement of azathioprine by mycophenolate mofetil is a safe way to improve renal function in children with heart transplants and calcineurin inhibitor induced nephrotoxicity."( Improvement of renal function in pediatric heart transplant recipients treated with low-dose calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil.
Boyer, O; Dechaux, M; Gubler, MC; Le Bidois, J; Niaudet, P, 2005
)
0.33
" The dosage of CNIs, cyclosporine or tacrolimus, was gradually reduced and withdrawn within 6 weeks from patients in the withdrawal group."( Differential effects of cyclosporine and tacrolimus on mycophenolate pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired kidney function.
Gerhardt, UW; Heck, M; Hohage, H; Suwelack, BM; Welling, U; Zeh, M, 2005
)
0.87
" Some studies have shown that C0 is a poor predictor of drug exposure (represented by AUC), and that concentrations measured after dosing may have a stronger correlation with AUC."( Best single time points as surrogates to the tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid area under the curve in adult liver transplant patients beyond 12 months of transplantation.
Barkun, J; Cantarovich, M; Deschenes, M; Mardigyan, V; Metrakos, P; Tchervenkov, J, 2005
)
0.59
"The aim of the present study was to determine whether plasma drug concentrations measured after dosing would be better correlated with the tacrolimus and mycoplasmic acid (MPA) (the active metabolite of MMF) AUC(0-12) values compared with C0 in liver transplant recipients > or = 12 months after transplantation."( Best single time points as surrogates to the tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid area under the curve in adult liver transplant patients beyond 12 months of transplantation.
Barkun, J; Cantarovich, M; Deschenes, M; Mardigyan, V; Metrakos, P; Tchervenkov, J, 2005
)
0.79
" The only adverse event to show a dose-response relationship was a transient feeling of warmth."( Oral pimecrolimus in the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis: a double-blind, multicentre, randomized, dose-finding trial.
Cherill, R; Emady-Azar, S; Gottlieb, AB; Griffiths, CE; Ho, VC; Lahfa, M; Marks, I; Mrowietz, U; Murrell, DF; Ortonne, JP; Paul, CF; Todd, G, 2005
)
0.33
" After week 2, prednisone and MMF were both tapered by 20% of the initial dosage per week."( Donor leukocytes combine with immunosuppressive drug therapy to prolong limb allograft survival.
Bishop, GA; Fujioka, H; Kanatani, T; Kurosaka, M; Lanzetta, M; Matsumoto, T; McCaughan, GW; Owen, E, 2005
)
0.33
" However, dosing and long-term efficacy remains a critical issue in stent-based local drug delivery."( Comparative study of tacrolimus and paclitaxel stent coating in the porcine coronary model.
Böhm, M; Grandt, A; Lorenz, G; Nickenig, G; Scheller, B; Wnendt, S, 2005
)
0.65
" These observations should be taken into consideration when switching from one calcineurin inhibitor to another, but the final dosage should be based on both this pharmacokinetic data and the clinical situation."( Randomized calcineurin inhibitor cross over study to measure the pharmacokinetics of co-administered enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium.
Balez, S; Bastien, MC; Kaplan, B; Meier-Kriesche, HU; Minnick, P; Picard, F; Schmouder, R; Sechaud, R; Yeh, CM, 2005
)
0.33
" Further trials are necessary to determine the optimal dosage and duration of therapy, and its efficacy in comparison to standard regimens."( Tacrolimus for induction therapy of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: an open-labeled pilot study.
Au, TC; Mok, CC; Siu, YP; To, CH; Tong, KH, 2005
)
1.77
" Numerous physiological changes occur with aging that could potentially affect the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and, hence, patient dosage requirements."( Pharmacokinetic considerations relating to tacrolimus dosing in the elderly.
Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2005
)
0.81
" Manual muscle testing results, serum creatine kinase (CK) levels, and the daily corticosteroid dosage were used to assess improvement in myositis."( Treatment of antisynthetase-associated interstitial lung disease with tacrolimus.
Fertig, N; Lucas, MR; Oddis, CV; Sereika, SM; Wilkes, MR, 2005
)
0.56
" A statistically significant reduction in the corticosteroid dosage was also observed."( Treatment of antisynthetase-associated interstitial lung disease with tacrolimus.
Fertig, N; Lucas, MR; Oddis, CV; Sereika, SM; Wilkes, MR, 2005
)
0.56
" Patient and graft survival, renal function, study drug dosing and discontinuations were evaluated at 1 year."( A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 1 year.
Gonwa, T; Jensik, S; Mendez, R; Steinberg, S; Weinstein, S; Yang, HC, 2005
)
0.61
" The renal tolerability of CsA is reasonably good when the dosage is low."( Treatment of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.
Meyrier, A, 2005
)
0.33
" Pimecrolimus blood levels from a subgroup of 22 patients showed no difference in systemic exposure between the two dosing regimens."( A randomized study of the safety, absorption and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% applied twice or four times daily in patients with atopic dermatitis.
Abrams, K; Caro, I; Gottlieb, A; Ling, M; Pariser, D; Scott, G; Stewart, D, 2005
)
0.33
" Systemic absorption of pimecrolimus applied BID and QID is minimal and is not different between dosing regimens."( A randomized study of the safety, absorption and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% applied twice or four times daily in patients with atopic dermatitis.
Abrams, K; Caro, I; Gottlieb, A; Ling, M; Pariser, D; Scott, G; Stewart, D, 2005
)
0.33
"Tacrolimus (TAC) dosing in lung transplantation is traditionally based on blood trough levels (C0)."( Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in lung transplantation: new strategies for monitoring.
Jakob, H; Kamler, M; Ragette, R; Teschler, H; Weinreich, G, 2005
)
3.21
" Fifteen patients had variable response to C-I and MMF, but they achieved CR after CTX and their initial dosage of C-I and MMF were reduced to nearly one half."( Combination of immunosuppressive agents in treatment of steroid-resistant minimal change disease and primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.
El-Reshaid, K; El-Reshaid, W; Madda, J, 2005
)
0.33
"The purpose of this study is to find out whether basiliximab administration will improve postoperative renal function by delaying the start of tacrolimus and decreasing of dosage requirement for tacrolimus in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT)."( The renal-sparing efficacy of basiliximab in adult living donor liver transplantation.
Chen, CL; Chen, YS; Chuang, FR; Jawan, B; Lee, CH; Lin, CC; Liu, YW; Wang, CC, 2005
)
0.53
"Therapeutic drug monitoring(TDM) is advocate to provide information about the adequacy of a dosing regimen or likelihood of toxicity associated with drug."( [Current status of therapeutic drug monitoring for immunosuppressive drugs].
Uchida, K, 2005
)
0.33
" For CYA and TAC treatment periods, the median NS relapse rate was two and one relapses per year, respectively, and cumulative steroid dosage was 73."( Treatment of severe steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) in children with tacrolimus.
Clark, AG; MacLeod, R; Rigby, E; Sinha, MD, 2006
)
0.56
" The immunosuppression scheme and dosage of drugs used in pregnant women are vital to both the normal course of pregnancy and delivery of a healthy child."( [Immunosuppressive drug therapy during pregnancy after kidney transplantation].
Gryboś, M; Kazimierczak, I; Kazimierczak, K; Klinger, M; Weyde, W; Zmonarski, S, 2005
)
0.33
" Tacrolimus levels and dosage requirements were compared during and after itraconazole therapy."( Itraconazole prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus (FK 506): efficacy and drug interaction.
Bakal, I; Kramer, MR; Ollech, A; Ollech, JE; Sahar, G; Saute, M; Shitrit, D, 2005
)
1.48
" The FK506 concentrations standardized by dosage and body weight (FK506 concentration per dose/kg) were compared among the 3 subgroups within the MDR1 exon 21 and exon 26 groups."( [Relationship between MDR1 gene polymorphism and blood concentration of tacrolimus in renal transplant patients].
Guan, DL; Hu, XP; Lü, YP; Ma, LL; Wang, W; Wang, Y; Zhang, P; Zhang, XD, 2005
)
0.56
" Therefore obtaining a sufficient tacrolimus blood level via this molecular information-based initial dosage adjustment may enable the episode of acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation to be reduced."( Intestinal MDR1/ABCB1 level at surgery as a risk factor of acute cellular rejection in living-donor liver transplant patients.
Fukatsu, S; Goto, M; Inui, K; Kiuchi, T; Masuda, S; Ogura, Y; Oike, F; Takada, Y; Tanaka, K; Uesugi, M, 2006
)
0.61
" Tacrolimus dosage and blood trough concentration were investigated at 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month after transplantation."( Influence of CYP3A5 gene polymorphisms of donor rather than recipient to tacrolimus individual dose requirement in liver transplantation.
Jiang, G; Jin, J; Wu, L; Xie, H; Yan, S; Yu, S; Zheng, S, 2006
)
1.48
" Information derived from the whole blood population model may subsequently be used by clinicians for dosage individualisation through Bayesian forecasting."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in whole blood and plasma in asian liver transplant patients.
Aw, M; Chan, SY; Ho, PC; Holmes, MJ; Lee, KH; Lim, SG; Prabhakaran, K; Quak, SH; Sam, WJ; Tham, LS, 2006
)
0.62
"The influence of ABCB1 (MDR1) polymorphisms on tacrolimus dosing has been questioned in previous studies with contradictory findings, possibly due to the association between CYP3A5 polymorphisms and tacrolimus dosing."( Impact of ABCB1 (MDR1) haplotypes on tacrolimus dosing in adult lung transplant patients who are CYP3A5 *3/*3 non-expressors.
Burckart, GJ; Iacono, A; McCurry, K; McDade, K; Schuetz, E; Wang, J; Watanabe, RM; Webber, S; Zaldonis, D; Zeevi, A; Zheng, H, 2006
)
0.86
"A total of 91 lung transplant patients treated primarily with tacrolimus and prednisone were enrolled, and clinical information on drug dosing and blood levels was collected."( Impact of ABCB1 (MDR1) haplotypes on tacrolimus dosing in adult lung transplant patients who are CYP3A5 *3/*3 non-expressors.
Burckart, GJ; Iacono, A; McCurry, K; McDade, K; Schuetz, E; Wang, J; Watanabe, RM; Webber, S; Zaldonis, D; Zeevi, A; Zheng, H, 2006
)
0.85
"This study demonstrates that ABCB1 haplotypes derived from three common polymorphisms are associated with tacrolimus dosing in lung transplant patients when eliminating the confounder CYP3A5 genotype."( Impact of ABCB1 (MDR1) haplotypes on tacrolimus dosing in adult lung transplant patients who are CYP3A5 *3/*3 non-expressors.
Burckart, GJ; Iacono, A; McCurry, K; McDade, K; Schuetz, E; Wang, J; Watanabe, RM; Webber, S; Zaldonis, D; Zeevi, A; Zheng, H, 2006
)
0.82
" MR-4's once-daily dosing offers an advantage over the currently available calcineurin inhibitors in preventing graft rejection."( Modified-release tacrolimus.
Chisholm, MA; Middleton, MD, 2006
)
0.67
" Leflunomide was dosed to a targeted blood level of active metabolite, A77 1726, of 50 microg/ml to 100 microg/ml (150 microM to 300 microM)."( Treatment of renal allograft polyoma BK virus infection with leflunomide.
Atwood, W; Foster, P; Garfinkel, M; Gillen, D; Harland, R; Javaid, B; Jordan, J; Josephson, MA; Kadambi, P; Meehan, S; Millis, MJ; Sadhu, M; Thistlethwaite, RJ; Williams, J, 2006
)
0.33
" This report details drug dosing and monitoring, protocol discontinuance, biopsy-proven rejection, graft failure, other adverse events, and death at 36 months postoperatively."( A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus/sirolimus versus tacrolimums/mycophenolate versus cyclosporine/sirolimus in renal transplantation: three-year analysis.
Burke, GW; Ciancio, G; Gaynor, JJ; Kupin, W; Miller, J; Rosen, A; Roth, D; Ruiz, P, 2006
)
0.62
" We evaluated total Quantitative MG (Q-MG) score, anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody titer in the blood, interleukin 2 (IL-2) production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), administration dosage of prednisolone (PSL), and adverse effects of FK506."( Long-term therapeutic efficacy and safety of low-dose tacrolimus (FK506) for myasthenia gravis.
Igarashi, S; Naruse, S; Nishizawa, M; Onodera, O; Oyake, M; Shimohata, T; Tada, M; Tanaka, K; Tsuji, S, 2006
)
0.58
"A reduction in steroid dosage of 50% without worsening of the symptoms was observed 1 year after FK506 administration in three out of six steroid-dependent MG patients (50."( Long-term therapeutic efficacy and safety of low-dose tacrolimus (FK506) for myasthenia gravis.
Igarashi, S; Naruse, S; Nishizawa, M; Onodera, O; Oyake, M; Shimohata, T; Tada, M; Tanaka, K; Tsuji, S, 2006
)
0.58
"The suspension was physically (particle size) and microbiologically stable during the 8-week study period suggesting other factors including poor dosing could be responsible for the pharmacokinetic variation observed during clinical use which warrants further investigation."( Physical and microbiological stability of an extemporaneous tacrolimus suspension for paediatric use.
Beeton, A; Han, J; Long, PF; Tuleu, C; Wong, I, 2006
)
0.58
" Recipients receiving protease inhibitor-based HAART regimens required significant dosing modification to maintain appropriate tacrolimus levels."( [Renal transplantation in HIV-infected patients in Spain].
Baltar, JM; Cofán, F; Gómez, E; González-Molina, M; López, F; Marcén, R; Mazuecos, A; Oppenheimer, F; Pascual, J; Puig-Hooper, CE; Rivero, M; Sola, E, 2006
)
0.54
" Newer topical medications are being used that have multiple actions, such as an antihistaminic effect coupled with mast-cell stabilisation, and which require reduced daily dosing due to their longer duration of action."( Pharmacotherapy of allergic eye disease.
Flynn, TH; Larkin, F; Manzouri, B; Ono, SJ; Wyse, R, 2006
)
0.33
" Both tacrolimus and cyclosporine are substrates of Pgp, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, and therefore, these molecules are potential pharmacokinetic factors with which to establish personalized dosage regimens for these drugs."( An up-date review on individualized dosage adjustment of calcineurin inhibitors in organ transplant patients.
Inui, K; Masuda, S, 2006
)
0.81
" In multivariate analysis, the independent predictive factors for anemia at M6 were mean corpuscular volume (<85 fl) at day 7, daily steroid dosage (<0."( Predictive factors for anemia six and twelve months after orthotopic liver transplantation.
Esposito, L; Guitard, J; Kamar, N; Lavayssière, L; Muscari, F; Perron, JM; Ribes, D; Rostaing, L; Suc, B, 2006
)
0.33
" However, estimation of AUC requires multiple blood samples throughout the dosing period, which is often inconvenient and expensive."( Beyond cyclosporine: a systematic review of limited sampling strategies for other immunosuppressants.
Ensom, MH; Ting, LS; Villeneuve, E, 2006
)
0.33
" There were no abnormal radiographic findings, and there was no improvement with a reduction of CI dosage or with administration of a calcium channel blocker."( Calcineurin inhibitor-induced irreversible neuropathic pain after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Aoyama, K; Fujii, N; Hiraki, A; Ikeda, K; Ishimaru, F; Kondo, E; Koyama, M; Masunari, T; Matsuzaki, T; Mizobuchi, S; Shinagawa, K; Tanimoto, M; Teshima, T, 2006
)
0.33
" Moreover, 18 at a dosage of 10 mg/kg was found to be significantly neuroprotective in a mouse peripheral sympathetic nerve injury model induced by 8 mg/kg 6-hydroxydopamine."( FK506-binding protein ligands: structure-based design, synthesis, and neurotrophic/neuroprotective properties of substituted 5,5-dimethyl-2-(4-thiazolidine)carboxylates.
Hu, Y; Huang, W; Li, S; Liu, H; Wang, L; Xiao, J; Zhao, L; Zhong, W, 2006
)
0.33
" Steroid dosing was identical in both groups."( A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of tacrolimus-based therapy with or without basiliximab in pediatric renal transplantation.
Beattie, J; Fitzpatrick, M; Friman, S; Grenda, R; Hughes, D; Janssen, F; Milford, DV; Moghal, NE; Perner, F; Saleem, MA; Trompeter, R; Van Damme-Lombaerts, R; Vondrak, K; Watson, A; Webb, NJ, 2006
)
0.59
" Reduction in dosage of CNI may delay the development of CAN, leading to longer graft survival."( Stable graft function after reduction of calcineurin inhibitor dosage in paediatric kidney transplant patients.
Amann, K; Benz, K; Dittrich, K; Dötsch, J; Klare, B; Nüsken, KD; Plank, C; Rascher, W; Sauerstein, K; Stuppy, A, 2006
)
0.33
" Over a period of 9 months CNI dosage was stepwise reduced from CSA trough levels of 100-150 ng/ml to 50-70 ng/ml and Tac trough levels of 5-8 ng/ml to 2-3 ng/ml, respectively."( Stable graft function after reduction of calcineurin inhibitor dosage in paediatric kidney transplant patients.
Amann, K; Benz, K; Dittrich, K; Dötsch, J; Klare, B; Nüsken, KD; Plank, C; Rascher, W; Sauerstein, K; Stuppy, A, 2006
)
0.33
"No optimal tacrolimus dosage regimen suitable for clinical use in liver transplant recipients has yet been established."( A nomogram for predicting the optimal oral dosage of tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients with small-for-size grafts.
Furukawa, H; Kishino, S; Ohno, K; Shimamura, T; Todo, S,
)
0.77
"These findings could be useful to the health care provider for adjustment of tacrolimus dosage in adult liver transplant recipients with various clinical factors."( Factors affecting the apparent clearance of tacrolimus in Korean adult liver transplant recipients.
Hahn, HJ; Lee, JY; Oh, JM; Shin, WG; Son, IJ; Suh, KS; Yi, NJ, 2006
)
0.82
" The appropriate utilisation of the drugs involves the administration of an adequate dosage to reach the blood concentrations that will suppress the alloimmune response, while avoiding secondary toxicities."( Chronopharmacokinetics of ciclosporin and tacrolimus.
Baraldo, M; Furlanut, M, 2006
)
0.6
" This case illustrates the potential role of tacrolimus and sirolimus dosing in combination therapy to produce severe intrarenal vasoconstriction."( Reverse diastolic intrarenal flow due to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity.
Banas, B; Böger, CA; Krämer, BK; Mihatsch, MJ; Rümmele, P, 2006
)
0.59
" Tacrolimus was employed for the maintenance therapy, and the oral prednisolone dosage could successfully be tapered without recurrence, along with the decrement of the titer of MPO-ANCA."( Tacrolimus as a reinforcement therapy for a patient with MPO-ANCA-associated diffuse alveolar hemorrhage.
Eguchi, K; Honda, E; Honda, S; Ida, H; Iwanaga, N; Kawakami, A; Kawasaki, S; Nakamura, H; Origuchi, T; Tsuchihashi, Y; Yoshimine, H, 2007
)
2.69
" Children and adolescents particularly benefit from TDM, because dosing requirements are often not studied in the same detail as in adults."( Value of therapeutic drug monitoring of MMF therapy in pediatric transplantation.
Filler, G, 2006
)
0.33
" In this study, FK506 in combination with a small doses of steroid while decreasing FK506 dosage plays a role in consolidating the curative effect and preventing relapse."( FK506 in the treatment of children with nephrotic syndrome of different pathological types.
Fan, Z; Fu, Y; Gao, C; Gao, Y; Liu, G; Ren, X; Xia, Z; Zhang, LF, 2006
)
0.33
" Dosing and monitoring these drugs is based on pharmacokinetic protocols, but measuring a pharmacodynamic parameter, calcineurin phosphatase (CaN) activity, could be a valuable supplement in determining optimal doses."( The calcineurin activity profiles of cyclosporin and tacrolimus are different in stable renal transplant patients.
Højskov, C; Jørgensen, KA; Karamperis, N; Koefoed-Nielsen, PB; Poulsen, JH, 2006
)
0.58
" cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients, even when steroid dosing is lower with tacrolimus."( Relative risk of new-onset diabetes during the first year after renal transplantation in patients receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine immunosuppression.
Hilbrands, LB; Hoitsma, AJ,
)
0.57
" His tacrolimus dosage was decreased, and azathioprine was discontinued."( Tumor lysis syndrome associated with reduced immunosuppression in a lung transplant recipient.
Deel, C; Hellman, RN; Khan, BA, 2006
)
0.85
"In a dose-response study, there are frequently multiple goals and not all planned observations are realized at the end of the study."( Bayesian optimal designs for a quantal dose-response study with potentially missing observations.
Baek, I; Wong, WK; Wu, X; Zhu, W, 2006
)
0.33
" At every time point, this combination was presumed to correlate well with pre-intervention AUC, thus the dosage could be significantly reduced."( Pharmacokinetic study of the combination of tacrolimus and fluconazole in renal transplant patients.
Bunnachak, D; Jittikanont, S; Kanchanarattanakorn, K; Lumlertgul, D; Manoyot, A; Noppakun, K; Ophascharoensuk, V; Rojanasthien, N, 2006
)
0.59
" The tacrolimus dosage was then reduced by 40% and given in combination with fluconazole at 100-200 mg/day for one week, tacrolimus whole blood concentrations were studied again."( Pharmacokinetic study of the combination of tacrolimus and fluconazole in renal transplant patients.
Bunnachak, D; Jittikanont, S; Kanchanarattanakorn, K; Lumlertgul, D; Manoyot, A; Noppakun, K; Ophascharoensuk, V; Rojanasthien, N, 2006
)
1.11
" Mean tacrolimus dosage in this group could be reduced from 10."( Pharmacokinetic study of the combination of tacrolimus and fluconazole in renal transplant patients.
Bunnachak, D; Jittikanont, S; Kanchanarattanakorn, K; Lumlertgul, D; Manoyot, A; Noppakun, K; Ophascharoensuk, V; Rojanasthien, N, 2006
)
1.08
" SRL was dosed to achieve target trough levels between 10 and 20 ng/mL."( Sirolimus pharmacokinetics in pediatric renal transplant recipients receiving calcineurin inhibitor co-therapy.
Benfield, MR; Fennell, RS; Grimm, PC; Harmon, WE; Herrin, JT; Lirenman, DS; McDonald, RA; Munoz-Arizpe, R; Schachter, AD; Wyatt, RJ, 2006
)
0.33
" Nowadays, tacrolimus is one of the most widely used immunosuppressant agents together with cyclosporine following kidney and liver transplantation with a standardized twice-daily dosing regimen."( Review of the clinical experience with a modified release form of tacrolimus [FK506E (MR4)] in transplantation.
Büchler, MW; Mehrabi, A; Sauer, P; Schemmer, P; Schmidt, J; Weitz, J; Wente, MN, 2006
)
0.96
"For renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus as an immunosuppressant, practitioners can expect CYP3A5*1 carriers to have a tacrolimus clearance 25-45% greater than that of CYP3A5*3 homozygotes, with proportional dosing needs to maintain adequate immunosuppression."( Effects of genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of calcineurin inhibitors.
Hiles, JJ; Kolesar, J; Utecht, KN, 2006
)
0.6
" Sixty-six Chinese renal transplant patients enrolled in this study were surveyed for body weight and dosage and concentration of tacrolimus as well as MDR1 genotype by polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis."( Tacrolimus dosing in Chinese renal transplant patients is related to MDR1 gene C3435T polymorphisms.
Gui, R; Huang, Z; Li, D; Li, J; Nie, X, 2006
)
1.98
"9 ng/mL and area under the curve over a dosing interval (AUC) was 132 +/- 56 ng x h/mL."( Differential pharmacokinetic interaction of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on everolimus.
Curtis, JJ; Hricik, DE; Kovarik, JM; Pescovitz, MD; Scantlebury, V; Vasquez, A, 2006
)
0.59
" These results suggest that tacrolimus would not cause clinically significant interactions with other drugs, which are metabolized by CYPs, via the inhibition of hepatic metabolism and that the reason why cyclosporine, but not tacrolimus, has a pharmacokinetic inhibitory effect might be that the dosage and/or the unbound concentrations around its metabolic enzymes are higher than those of tacrolimus, rather than the differences in the inhibition potential."( Effect of cyclosporine and tacrolimus on cytochrome p450 activities in human liver microsomes.
Niwa, T; Saito, M; Shiraga, T; Takagi, A; Yamamoto, S, 2007
)
0.93
" The results support the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in combination with MMF, corticosteroids and basiliximab induction, as well as XL as a safe and effective once-daily dosing alternative."( One-year results with extended-release tacrolimus/MMF, tacrolimus/MMF and cyclosporine/MMF in de novo kidney transplant recipients.
Abouljoud, M; Bhattacharya, P; Dhadda, S; First, MR; Fitzsimmons, W; Holman, J; Kuo, PC; Silva, HT; Wisemandle, K; Yang, HC, 2007
)
0.86
" A high trough concentration of sirolimus might increase the risk of hematological toxicy, and adjustment of the dosage for immunosuppressive treatment will be necessary in Japanese patients."( Temporal decline in sirolimus elimination immediately after pancreatic islet transplantation.
Inui, K; Iwanaga, Y; Katsura, T; Masuda, S; Matsumoto, S; Nagata, H; Noguchi, H; Okitsu, T; Sato, E; Shimomura, M; Yano, I; Yonekawa, Y, 2006
)
0.33
" Single timepoint MPA concentration during the 12-hour dosing interval cannot reflect MPA AUC(12)."( Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and determination of area under the curve by abbreviated sampling strategy in Chinese liver transplant recipients.
Chen, H; Deng, X; Fei, Y; Li, H; Peng, C; Qiu, W; Shen, B; Shen, C; Yang, W; Yu, Z; Zhou, G, 2007
)
0.34
" Tacrolimus dosage was adjusted to maintain blood levels in the range of 7 to 10 ng/mL."( Long-term follow-up of tacrolimus treatment in immune posterior uveitis.
Ciancas, E; Figueroa, MS; Orte, L,
)
1.35
" Dosage effects of immunosuppressive drugs (tacrolimus, cyclosporin A, sirolimus, mycophenolic acid, and methylprednisolone) were evaluated in vitro and the assay was applied successfully to dialysis, renal transplant, and liver transplant patients."( Validation of immunological biomarkers for the pharmacodynamic monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs in humans.
Böhler, T; Budde, K; Glander, P; Gurragchaa, P; Kamar, N; Klupp, J; Neumayer, HH; Nolting, J; Reisener, K, 2007
)
0.6
" An individualized dosage regimen design incorporating such genetic information would help increase clinical efficacy of the drug while reducing adverse drug reactions."( Influence of the CYP3A5 and MDR1 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in healthy Korean subjects.
Choi, JH; Jang, SB; Kim, KH; Lee, JE; Lee, YJ; Park, K, 2007
)
0.57
" Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was administered at doses of 2 g per day with subsequent dosage adjustment based on tolerability."( A retrospective study of steroid elimination in simultaneous pancreas and preemptive kidney transplant (Sppre-Ktx) recipients.
Gałazka, Z; Grochowiecki, T; Grygiel, K; Nazarewski, S; Paczek, L; Pietrasik, K; Sańko-Resmer, J; Szmidt, J; Wyzgał, J, 2006
)
0.33
" Beginning on the morning of study day 8, patients were converted to XL on a 1:1 (mg:mg) basis for their total daily dose, and were maintained on a once-daily AM dosing regimen using the same therapeutic monitoring and patient care techniques employed with TAC."( Once-daily tacrolimus extended-release formulation: 1-year post-conversion in stable pediatric liver transplant recipients.
Anania, C; Dhadda, S; Emre, S; First, MR; Fitzsimmons, W; Florman, S; Heffron, TG; Kalayoglu, M; Keirns, J; Pescovitz, MD; Sawamoto, T; Smallwood, G; Wisemandle, K, 2007
)
0.73
" For pediatric patients, both drugs should be dosed per body surface area, and pharmacokinetic monitoring is mandatory."( Calcineurin inhibitors in pediatric renal transplant recipients.
Filler, G, 2007
)
0.34
"Our long-term objective is to develop evidence-based guidelines for age-appropriate drug dosing of all drugs commonly used during childhood and adolescence, based on pharmacokinetically/pharmacogenetically determined drug exposure to maximize therapeutic yield while minimizing toxicity."( Optimization of immunosuppressive drug monitoring in children.
Filler, G, 2007
)
0.34
" Coadministration of posaconazole increased cyclosporine exposure and necessitated dosage reductions of 14-29% for cyclosporine in three subjects."( Effect of oral posaconazole on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine and tacrolimus.
Gelone, S; Kantesaria, B; Krishna, G; Mant, TG; Martinho, M; Sansone-Parsons, A, 2007
)
0.57
"These findings suggest that the dosage of cyclosporine or tacrolimus should be reduced when posaconazole therapy is started and that plasma levels of the immunosuppressant should be monitored during and at the discontinuation of posaconazole therapy so that dosages are adjusted accordingly."( Effect of oral posaconazole on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine and tacrolimus.
Gelone, S; Kantesaria, B; Krishna, G; Mant, TG; Martinho, M; Sansone-Parsons, A, 2007
)
0.82
" Tacrolimus dosage and blood concentration were investigated at 1, 2 and 3 weeks after transplantation."( Polymorphisms of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-10, cytochrome P450 3A5 and ABCB1 in Chinese liver transplant patients treated with immunosuppressant tacrolimus.
Gao, J; Li, D; Lou, YQ; Wang, X; Zhang, GL; Zhu, JY, 2007
)
1.45
"We retrospectively analyzed the impact of sirolimus addition (SRL) with a 25% dosing reduction in calcineurin inhibitors on liver function among patients with or without hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection."( Lack of hepatotoxicity upon sirolimus addition to a calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen in hepatitis virus-positive renal transplant recipients.
Chang, HR; Lian, JD; Lin, CC, 2007
)
0.34
"The combination therapy with suplatast tosilate decreased the effective dosage of tacrolimus ointment supporting use of the combination therapy for refractory facial erythema."( Suplatast/tacrolimus combination therapy for refractory facial erythema in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis study.
Furue, M; Katayama, I; Miyachi, Y, 2007
)
0.97
" This was followed by low-dose twice a day tacrolimus monotherapy with consolidation to once daily dosing by 6 months and once every other day dosing by 12 months."( Renal transplantation in children managed with lymphocyte depleting agents and low-dose maintenance tacrolimus monotherapy.
Basu, A; Ellis, D; Janosky, J; Kayler, L; Moritz, M; Shapiro, R; Starzl, TE; Tan, H; Vats, A, 2007
)
0.82
"Tacrolimus extended-release (XL) is a once-daily formulation recently developed to reduce the frequency of dosing for patients currently using the twice-a-day formulation of tacrolimus (TAC)."( Two years postconversion from a prograf-based regimen to a once-daily tacrolimus extended-release formulation in stable kidney transplant recipients.
Alloway, R; First, MR; Fitzsimmons, W; Gourishankar, S; Hariharan, S; Khalil, K; Matas, A; Miller, J; Norman, D; Pirsch, J; Steinberg, S; Wisemandle, K; Zaltzman, J, 2007
)
2.02
" Therefore, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors by which to establish individualized dosage adjustment for these drugs should be identified."( [Individualized dosage regimen of immunosuppressive drugs based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis].
Fukudo, M, 2007
)
0.34
" In experimental transplants, many dosage regimens have been reported, often without such determinations."( Severe tacrolimus toxicity in rabbits.
Bishop, AT; Friedrich, PF; Gades, NM; Giessler, GA, 2007
)
0.79
"To obtain nontoxic drug concentrations in the blood, 3 dosage regimens were required."( Severe tacrolimus toxicity in rabbits.
Bishop, AT; Friedrich, PF; Gades, NM; Giessler, GA, 2007
)
0.79
"At an intramuscular dosage of 1 mg/kg/d, the mean tacrolimus blood level was 90."( Severe tacrolimus toxicity in rabbits.
Bishop, AT; Friedrich, PF; Gades, NM; Giessler, GA, 2007
)
1.05
"08 mg/kg/d dosage combined with intermittent drug level monitoring permits survival without significant complications."( Severe tacrolimus toxicity in rabbits.
Bishop, AT; Friedrich, PF; Gades, NM; Giessler, GA, 2007
)
0.79
"1%, symptoms recur rapidly on dosage reduction, and extremely long-term, or even lifelong, treatment is thus probably needed."( [Chronic actinic dermatitis: treatment with topical tacrolimus (two cases)].
Alquier-Bouffard, A; D'incan, M; Da Costa, CM; Franck, F; Roger, H; Souteyrand, P; Taïeb, A,
)
0.38
" Nevertheless, studies of the pharmacokinetic properties of the CNI, particularly cyclosporine, have led to improved dosing strategies."( Therapeutic monitoring of calcineurin inhibitors for the nephrologist.
Cantarovich, M; Cole, E; Schiff, J, 2007
)
0.34
"Risk for new-onset diabetes (NOD) after renal transplantation is higher with tacrolimus (Tac) than with cyclosporine (CsA), but the extent to which the diabetogenic effect of Tac is dosage dependent or steroid dependent remains uncertain."( Influence of early posttransplantation prednisone and calcineurin inhibitor dosages on the incidence of new-onset diabetes.
Brennan, DC; Burroughs, TE; Hardinger, K; Irish, WD; Lentine, KL; Machnicki, G; Schnitzler, MA; Swindle, J; Takemoto, SK, 2007
)
0.57
" Another challenge is to move toward prospective randomized studies to explore whether a pharmacogenetic approach, taking into account a limited number of polymorphisms prior to drug treatment, could be used on an individual basis to guide initial dosing of a given drug."( Pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus and sirolimus in renal transplant patients: from retrospective analyses to prospective studies.
Anglicheau, D; Legendre, C; Thervet, E, 2007
)
0.66
"This study compared the 24-month efficacy and safety of two immunosuppressive regimens using reduced calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) exposure with standard dosage of CsA in 240 patients who were randomized into three groups: group A (n=80): Thymoglobulin, CsA (4 mg/kg twice daily) plus azathioprine (1."( Randomized controlled study comparing reduced calcineurin inhibitors exposure versus standard cyclosporine-based immunosuppression.
Checa, MD; Fernández, A; García, JJ; González-Posada, JM; Hernández, D; Hortal, L; Miquel, R; Porrini, E; Rodríguez, A; Rufino, M; Torres, A, 2007
)
0.34
"The purpose of the study was to demonstrate how the interaction between phenytoin and tacrolimus (FK 506) can be managed clinically and to characterize the change in FK 506 levels after discontinuation of phenytoin in two Japanese heart transplant recipients with different dosing periods ofphenytoin."( Drug interactions between tacrolimus and phenytoin in Japanese heart transplant recipients: 2 case reports.
Hanatani, A; Kotake, T; Morishita, H; Nakatani, T; Ochi, H; Takada, M; Ueda, T; Wada, K, 2007
)
0.86
"The persistence of CYP induction after discontinuing phenytoin is dependent on the history of administration and, perhaps, on the dosing period in particular."( Drug interactions between tacrolimus and phenytoin in Japanese heart transplant recipients: 2 case reports.
Hanatani, A; Kotake, T; Morishita, H; Nakatani, T; Ochi, H; Takada, M; Ueda, T; Wada, K, 2007
)
0.64
" When efavirenz (four patients) or a nucleoside analogue combination (one patient) was added, very little change in tacrolimus dosing was required."( Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in hepatitis C virus and HIV co-infected liver transplant recipients in the ANRS HC-08 study.
Abbara, C; Barrail, A; Boissonnas, A; Bonhomme-Faivre, L; Duclos-Vallée, JC; Samuel, D; Taburet, AM; Teicher, E; Vincent, I; Vittecoq, D, 2007
)
0.8
" Tacrolimus dosing must be optimised according to therapeutic drug monitoring and the antiretroviral drug combination."( Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in hepatitis C virus and HIV co-infected liver transplant recipients in the ANRS HC-08 study.
Abbara, C; Barrail, A; Boissonnas, A; Bonhomme-Faivre, L; Duclos-Vallée, JC; Samuel, D; Taburet, AM; Teicher, E; Vincent, I; Vittecoq, D, 2007
)
1.5
" To assist in appropriate clinical management, we describe the pharmacokinetics and dosing modifications in 35 patients (20 kidney, 13 liver and two kidney-liver HIV-infected subjects with end-stage kidney or liver disease), on both IS and NNRTIs, PIs, and combined NNRTIs + PIs, in studies done at weeks 2-4 and/or 12 weeks after transplantation or after a change in IS or ARV drug regimen (n = 97 studies)."( Immunosuppressant pharmacokinetics and dosing modifications in HIV-1 infected liver and kidney transplant recipients.
Benet, LZ; Browne, M; Carlson, L; Cheng, A; Frassetto, LA; Roland, ME; Stock, PG; Wolfe, AR, 2007
)
0.34
"Gingival overgrowth was higher in the group that was administered the higher cyclosporine dosage (CsA2) than in the group that received the therapeutic dosage, showing a positive relation between dosage and severity of gingival overgrowth."( Histopathological and morphological alterations of periodontium in rats treated with tacrolimus and cyclosporine.
Costa, FI; Costa, FO; Costa, JE; Cota, LO; Lages, EJ; Lages, EM, 2007
)
0.56
"We aimed to evaluate an effective dosage and safety profile of pimecrolimus as an anti-inflammatory drug for drug-eluting stents."( Efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus-eluting stents in porcine coronary arteries.
Baffour, R; Diener, T; Harder, C; Hellinga, D; Jones, R; Pakala, R; Seabron, R; Tio, FO; Tittelbach, M; Virmani, R; Waksman, R; Wittchow, E,
)
0.13
" Of the 16 patients that received tacrolimus, comparable dosing on a per kilogram body weight basis was observed."( Predicting immunosuppressant dosing in the early postoperative period with noninvasive indocyanine green elimination following orthotopic liver transplantation.
Alster, JM; Beven, M; Cywinski, JB; Fung, JJ; Irefin, SA; Parker, BM; Popovich, M, 2008
)
0.63
" The most attractive candidate for a pharmacogenetic strategy is tacrolimus dosing based on the CYP3A5 genotype."( A pharmacogenetic strategy for immunosuppression based on the CYP3A5 genotype.
Holt, DW; MacPhee, IA, 2008
)
0.58
" Papillary bleeding index, time since transplant and azathioprine dosage were significant in the univariate and multivariate models (adjusted R=43."( Gingival overgrowth in renal transplant subjects medicated with tacrolimus in the absence of calcium channel blockers.
Cezário, ES; Costa, FO; Cota, LO; Ferreira, SD; Siqueira, FM; Soares, RV; Zenóbio, EG, 2008
)
0.58
" Since IP was still active and serum KL-6 remained high, 3 mg/day of tacrolimus was added to control IP further and to reduce the dosage of PSL which was recognized as one of the aggravation factors of pneumomediastinum."( A case report of rheumatoid arthritis complicated with rapidly progressive interstitial pneumonia, multiple bullae and pneumomediastinum, which was successfully treated with tacrolimus.
Komano, Y; Kubota, T; Miyasaka, N; Nonomura, Y; Ochi, S; Ogawa, J; Sugihara, T, 2008
)
0.77
" A novel once-daily dosage form of tacrolimus has recently been developed and is approved for use in Europe."( The role of tacrolimus in renal transplantation.
Bowman, LJ; Brennan, DC, 2008
)
1
" Cyclosporin taken at the currently recommended low dosage and not in combination with a CCB may not be associated with a significant risk for GE in individuals with good oral hygiene."( Gingival enlargement among renal transplant recipients in the era of new-generation immunosuppressants.
Armitage, GC; Greenberg, KV; Shiboski, CH, 2008
)
0.35
" There was no change in AUC(0-12), maximum plasma concentration, trough plasma concentration, or oral clearance of tacrolimus with variation in dosage or AUC of MPA."( No pharmacokinetic interactions between mycophenolic acid and tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, K; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Miura, M; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Suzuki, T, 2008
)
0.8
" Multiple blood samples were taken over one dosing interval after oral tacrolimus administration, and pharmacokinetics differences were compared."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in living donor liver transplant and deceased donor liver transplant recipients.
Abt, P; Batzold, P; Bozorgzadeh, A; Jain, A; Kashyap, R; Kwong, T; Orloff, M; Sharma, R; Tsoulfas, G; Venkataramanan, R; Williamson, M, 2008
)
0.9
"The mean tacrolimus dosage in first 14 postoperative days was (0."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in living donor liver transplant and deceased donor liver transplant recipients.
Abt, P; Batzold, P; Bozorgzadeh, A; Jain, A; Kashyap, R; Kwong, T; Orloff, M; Sharma, R; Tsoulfas, G; Venkataramanan, R; Williamson, M, 2008
)
1.09
"Intermittent dosing of a topical calcineurin inhibitor for preventing atopic dermatitis (AD) disease relapse in patients with stabilized AD has not been evaluated."( Intermittent therapy for flare prevention and long-term disease control in stabilized atopic dermatitis: a randomized comparison of 3-times-weekly applications of tacrolimus ointment versus vehicle.
Abramovits, W; Breneman, D; Crowe, AW; Fleischer, AB; Gold, MH; Hanifin, JM; Jaracz, E; Kirsner, RS; Shull, TF; Zeichner, J, 2008
)
0.54
" Results of these studies have established the safety and efficacy of this once-daily dosing alternative."( First clinical experience with the new once-daily formulation of tacrolimus.
First, MR, 2008
)
0.58
", reduction of tacrolimus monotherapy dosing to every other day, three times a week, twice a week, or once a week) attempted."( Alemtuzumab preconditioning with tacrolimus monotherapy-the impact of serial monitoring for donor-specific antibody.
Basu, A; Blisard, DM; Girnita, AL; Gray, EA; Kayler, LK; Marcos, A; Randhawa, PS; Shapiro, R; Starzl, TE; Tan, HP; Thai, NL; Zeevi, A, 2008
)
0.98
" Whether age-specific tacrolimus dosing algorithms will improve outcome needs further study."( Maturation of dose-corrected tacrolimus predose trough levels in pediatric kidney allograft recipients.
Concepcion, W; Kambham, N; Li, L; Naesens, M; Salvatierra, O; Sarwal, M, 2008
)
0.95
"Tacrolimus dosage in pediatric RTRs is empirically based on weight."( Standard dosing of tacrolimus leads to overexposure in pediatric renal transplantation recipients.
Kausman, JY; Marks, SD; Patel, B, 2008
)
2.12
" This interim analysis showed no evidence of an increased risk of poorer performance among the early steroid reduction or safety differences in kidney transplant recipients versus a regular dosage steroid group of patients."( Corticosteroid reduction with tacrolimus (CORRETA) TRIAL: a prospective Brazilian multicenter, randomized trial of early corticosteroid reduction versus regular corticosteroid dosage maintenance on a tacrolimus (Prograf) and mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcep
Abbud-Filho, M; Campos, HH; Carvalho, DB; Cavalcanti, RL; Garcia, VD; Goncalves, RT; Lobao-Neto, AA, 2008
)
0.63
"The optimal dosing protocol for rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction in renal transplantation has not been determined, but evidence exists that rATG infusion before renal allograft reperfusion improves early graft function."( Randomized trial of single-dose versus divided-dose rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction in renal transplantation: an interim report.
Christensen, KA; Freifeld, AG; Grant, WJ; Groggel, GC; Henning, ME; Kellogg, AM; Lane, JT; Langnas, AN; Mercer, DF; Nielsen, KJ; Rigley, TH; Sandoz, JP; Skorupa, AJ; Skorupa, JY; Stevens, RB; Wrenshall, LE, 2008
)
0.35
"Between April 20, 2004 and December 26, 2007 we enrolled renal transplant patients into a prospective, randomized, nonblinded trial of two rATG dosing protocols (single dose, 6 mg/kg vs."( Randomized trial of single-dose versus divided-dose rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction in renal transplantation: an interim report.
Christensen, KA; Freifeld, AG; Grant, WJ; Groggel, GC; Henning, ME; Kellogg, AM; Lane, JT; Langnas, AN; Mercer, DF; Nielsen, KJ; Rigley, TH; Sandoz, JP; Skorupa, AJ; Skorupa, JY; Stevens, RB; Wrenshall, LE, 2008
)
0.35
" However, its optimal dosing in this subgroup has not been studied."( Thymoglobulin dose optimization for induction therapy in high risk kidney transplant recipients.
Airee, R; Drachenberg, C; Gurk-Turner, C; Haririan, A; Kukuruga, D; Philosophe, B, 2008
)
0.35
"To evaluate the effect of total rATG dosing on graft outcomes in such patients, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 96 adult patients who received repeat transplants (85%) or had panel reactive antibody more than 40% (19%) and were maintained on tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid."( Thymoglobulin dose optimization for induction therapy in high risk kidney transplant recipients.
Airee, R; Drachenberg, C; Gurk-Turner, C; Haririan, A; Kukuruga, D; Philosophe, B, 2008
)
0.53
" Calcineurin activity at trough time points was suggested as a single surrogate predictor for overall calcineurin activity throughout dosing periods."( Pharmacodynamic monitoring of calcineurin phosphatase activity in transplant patients treated with calcineurin inhibitors.
Yano, I, 2008
)
0.35
" Simple reduction in dosage of CNI has little or no long-term benefit on their adverse effects, and complete withdrawal without threatening graft outcome may only be possible after liver transplantation."( Calcineurin inhibitor sparing in paediatric solid organ transplantation : managing the efficacy/toxicity conundrum.
Brown, NW; Dhawan, A; Tredger, JM, 2008
)
0.35
" The impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of genes encoding CYP3A5 and P-gp on CNI dosing was examined among Asian renal transplant recipients."( Significant impact of gene polymorphisms on tacrolimus but not cyclosporine dosing in Asian renal transplant recipients.
Chin, YM; Loh, PT; Lou, HX; Vathsala, A; Zhao, Y, 2008
)
0.61
"The significant interindividual and intraindividual variability in the blood concentrations of the most commonly used calcineurin inhibitors such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine makes the exact dosing of these agents in transplant recipients very challenging."( Altered first-pass effects in a liver transplant recipient explained intraindividual variation in calcineurin inhibitor concentrations: a case report.
Chalasani, NP; Gorski, JC; Hall, SD; Malireddy, SR; Pinto, AG, 2008
)
0.55
"A liver transplant recipient, who had previously presented with tacrolimus toxicity on his usual dosing regimen and intolerant to standard doses of cyclosporine, was selected to undergo the study."( Altered first-pass effects in a liver transplant recipient explained intraindividual variation in calcineurin inhibitor concentrations: a case report.
Chalasani, NP; Gorski, JC; Hall, SD; Malireddy, SR; Pinto, AG, 2008
)
0.58
"Between December 2004 and February 2006, a single-center, open-label randomized trial of MMF (group A, n=75) versus EC-MPS (group B, n=75) was performed in primary renal transplant recipients receiving combined thymoglobulin/daclizumab induction along with reduced tacrolimus dosing and elimination of corticosteroids 1 week postoperatively."( Randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in primary renal transplant recipients given tacrolimus and daclizumab/thymoglobulin: one year follow-up.
Burke, GW; Ciancio, G; Gaynor, JJ; Hanson, L; Kupin, W; Miller, J; Rosen, A; Roth, D; Ruiz, P; Sageshima, J; Tueros, L, 2008
)
0.73
" Optimizing either MMF or EC-MPS along with a combined thymoglobulin/daclizumab induction, low tacrolimus dosing and steroid avoidance resulted in a low AR rate and an acceptably high renal function at 12 months."( Randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in primary renal transplant recipients given tacrolimus and daclizumab/thymoglobulin: one year follow-up.
Burke, GW; Ciancio, G; Gaynor, JJ; Hanson, L; Kupin, W; Miller, J; Rosen, A; Roth, D; Ruiz, P; Sageshima, J; Tueros, L, 2008
)
0.77
" Concentration-controlled dosing of MMF based on routine therapeutic drug monitoring, which requires area under the concentration-time curve (mycophenolic acid [MPA]-AUC0-12h) determinations, is uncommon."( Defining algorithms for efficient therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients.
Beiras-Fernandez, A; Bigdeli, AK; Kaczmarek, I; Kaczmarek, P; Meiser, B; Mueller, T; Reichart, B; Schmoeckel, M; Ueberfuhr, P; Vogeser, M, 2008
)
0.35
" The aim of this study was to examine the influence of the CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and MDR1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on changes in tacrolimus exposure and dosing in renal allograft recipients treated with fluconazole."( Effects of CYP3A5 and MDR1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on drug interactions between tacrolimus and fluconazole in renal allograft recipients.
de Jonge, H; Kuypers, DR; Naesens, M; Vanrenterghem, Y, 2008
)
0.77
"01), so that a marked dosage increase was needed (0."( Drop in trough blood concentrations of tacrolimus after switching from nelfinavir to fosamprenavir in four HIV-infected liver transplant patients.
Adani, GL; Bresadola, V; Furlanut, M; Londero, A; Pavan, F; Pea, F; Tavio, M; Viale, P, 2008
)
0.62
"The existence of moderate to severe arteriosclerosis in medium-sized arteries would have the potential of causing chronic TAC nephrotoxicities, rather than the dosage or whole blood trough level of TAC."( Clinical and histological analysis of chronic tacrolimus nephrotoxicity in renal allografts.
Ishida, H; Omoto, K; Shimizu, T; Shirakawa, H; Tanabe, K; Yamaguchi, Y, 2008
)
0.6
" Especially, clinically relevant immunosuppressive drug interactions require prompt identification, intensified monitoring of drug concentrations and adequate dosing responses."( Influence of interactions between immunosuppressive drugs on therapeutic drug monitoring.
Kuypers, DR, 2008
)
0.35
" Details of drug dosage history, sampling time and concentration of 802 data points in 58 patients were collected retrospectively."( [Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Chinese renal transplant patients].
Bi, SS; Chen, WQ; Li, L; Liu, X; Lu, W; Zhang, GM; Zhang, XL, 2008
)
0.63
" Pancreatic insulin content decreased dose-dependently in both the bolus intravenous injection and continuous intravenous infusion groups, and there was no significant difference between the decreases caused by the two dosing regimens."( Effect of pharmacokinetic profile on the pancreatic toxicity and efficacy of tacrolimus in rats.
Asano, M; Hanaoka, K; Mitamura, T; Niwa, T; Seki, J; Yamada, A, 2008
)
0.57
"8 mg/dL) were switched to SRL monotherapy, initially at a dosage between 3 and 5 mg/d, and subsequently adapted to achieve trough level between 8 to 10 ng/mL."( Sirolimus monotherapy effectiveness in liver transplant recipients with renal dysfunction due to calcineurin inhibitors.
Ballarin, R; Cappelli, G; De Ruvo, N; Di Benedetto, F; Di Sandro, S; Gerunda, GE; Montalti, R; Spaggiari, M, 2009
)
0.35
" In most cases of PRES, the symptom complex is reversible by reducing the dosage or withholding the drug for a few days."( PRES (posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome), a rare complication of tacrolimus therapy.
Coyle, J; Fanning, N; Hodnett, P; Maher, MM; O'Regan, K, 2009
)
0.58
" We analyzed the blood concentrations and the rate of concentration compared with dosage (C/D rate) pre- and postcombination over 6 months."( Tripterygium wilfordii hook f increase the blood concentration of tacrolimus.
Chen, J; Ji, S; Li, L; Liu, Z; Wen, J; Zheng, C, 2008
)
0.58
"In contrast to the previous reports, the CYP3A5 *1 allele was not associated with the frequency of SAR or CAN, suggesting that further studies of different immunosuppressive strategies using tacrolimus are needed to confirm the adequate dosing and concentration of tacrolimus for each CYP3A5 genotype."( CYP3A5 *1 allele associated with tacrolimus trough concentrations but not subclinical acute rejection or chronic allograft nephropathy in Japanese renal transplant recipients.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, K; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Komatsuda, A; Miura, M; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Suzuki, T; Tsuchiya, N, 2009
)
0.82
" Patients were administered tacrolimus at a dosage of 1, 2 or 3 mg once daily, and followed up for 24 weeks."( Single center prospective study of tacrolimus efficacy and safety in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
Amano, K; Kameda, H; Nagasawa, H; Nishi, E; Ogawa, H; Sekiguchi, N; Suzuki, K; Takei, H; Takeuchi, T; Tsuzaka, K, 2009
)
0.92
" The FK506 intervention group was intraperitoneally injected with FK506 immediately after HIBD, at a dosage of 1 mg/kg daily, for three days."( [Effect of tacrolimus on growth-associated protein-43 expression in the hippocampus of neonatal rats with hypoxic-ischemic brain damage].
Xiong, Y; Yuan, SY; Zhou, Y, 2009
)
0.74
" Because patients are typically dosed per kilogram body weight, this might result in underexposure and overexposure in patients, with a low and high body weight, respectively."( Explaining variability in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics to optimize early exposure in adult kidney transplant recipients.
Danhof, M; de Fijter, JW; den Hartigh, J; Guchelaar, HJ; Ploeger, BA; Press, RR; van der Straaten, T; van Pelt, J, 2009
)
0.65
" With regard to the ABCB1 SNPs, they did not show any influence on tacrolimus dosing requirements."( The effect of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on tacrolimus dose requirements in Caucasian liver transplant patients.
Biondi, F; D'Alessandro, N; Gridelli, B; Labbozzetta, M; Notarbartolo, M; Palazzo, U; Polidori, P; Poma, P; Provenzani, A; Sanguedolce, R; Triolo, F; Vizzini, G,
)
0.6
"Pharmacogenetic analysis of CYP3A5 in the donor could contribute to determine the appropriate initial dosage of tacrolimus in liver transplant patients."( The effect of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on tacrolimus dose requirements in Caucasian liver transplant patients.
Biondi, F; D'Alessandro, N; Gridelli, B; Labbozzetta, M; Notarbartolo, M; Palazzo, U; Polidori, P; Poma, P; Provenzani, A; Sanguedolce, R; Triolo, F; Vizzini, G,
)
0.58
" Dosing compliance (DC) was calculated for each patient and the mean DC was compared between the two groups."( Impact of a pharmaceutical care program on liver transplant patients' compliance with immunosuppressive medication: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial using electronic monitoring.
Klein, A; Krämer, I; Otto, G, 2009
)
0.35
" Dose adjustment according to drug concentration measurements is recommended to optimize dosing of MMF and to maintain adequate immunosuppression in patients converted to low-dose CNI therapy."( Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolites in stable adult liver transplant recipients with renal dysfunction on a low-dose calcineurin inhibitor regimen and mycophenolate mofetil.
Armstrong, VW; Beckebaum, S; Cicinnati, VR; Gerken, G; Klein, CG; Oellerich, M; Paul, A; Streit, F, 2009
)
0.35
"5 g/d in patients who had partial or complete remission), change in kidney function, and tacrolimus dosing and serum levels."( Tacrolimus therapy in adults with steroid- and cyclophosphamide-resistant nephrotic syndrome and normal or mildly reduced GFR.
Chen, J; Chen, Y; Han, F; He, Q; He, X; Li, H; Li, Q; Li, X; Wang, H; Ye, H; Zhang, X, 2009
)
2.02
"Multiple administration of h-IFN without co-administration of tacrolimus induced IgG response at 2 or 3 weeks following first administration in the short dosing interval (daily, once per 3 days, or once per a week), irrespective of the dosing interval."( Effect of co-administration of tacrolimus on the pharmacokinetics of multiple subcutaneous administered interferon-alpha in rats.
Ishida, T; Kiwada, H; Miyake, M; Mukai, T; Nishibayashi, T; Odomi, M; Yamazaki, H, 2009
)
0.88
"001 mg/kg) may be a promising way to assess crossover pharmacokinetic study of human or humanized proteinic formulations with multiple dosing schedules in an experimental animal."( Effect of co-administration of tacrolimus on the pharmacokinetics of multiple subcutaneous administered interferon-alpha in rats.
Ishida, T; Kiwada, H; Miyake, M; Mukai, T; Nishibayashi, T; Odomi, M; Yamazaki, H, 2009
)
0.64
" These data show that a larger dosage is needed for everolimus than sirolimus to maintain the same trough blood concentration."( Larger dosage required for everolimus than sirolimus to maintain same blood concentration in two pancreatic islet transplant patients with tacrolimus.
Inui, K; Iwanaga, Y; Katsura, T; Masuda, S; Matsumoto, S; Okitsu, T; Sato, E; Shimomura, M; Uemoto, S; Yano, I, 2009
)
0.56
" Narrow therapeutic range and individual variance in pharmacokinetics make it difficult to establish a fixed dosage for all patients."( Stepwise regression analysis of the determinants of blood tacrolimus concentrations in Chinese patients with liver transplant.
Cai, WM; Chen, B; Jin, Z; Mao, AW; Zhang, WX, 2009
)
0.6
" This 2-year, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of concentration-controlled MMF (MMF(CC)) dosing with a fixed-dose regimen in 720 kidney recipients."( Fixed- or controlled-dose mycophenolate mofetil with standard- or reduced-dose calcineurin inhibitors: the Opticept trial.
Angelis, M; Bloom, RD; Cibrik, D; Gaston, RS; Kaplan, B; Meier-Kriesche, HU; Mulgaonkar, S; Patel, D; Shah, T; Shaw, LM, 2009
)
0.35
" Tacrolimus was dosed seeking a trough blood level of 8 to 10 ng/mL by month 3 and 5 to 8 ng/mL thereafter."( Prospective clinical trial comparing two immunosuppressive regimens, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine, in de novo renal transplant recipients: results at 6 months follow-up.
Castagneto, M; Citterio, F; Delreno, F; Favi, E; Gargiulo, A; Romagnoli, J; Spagnoletti, G, 2009
)
1.5
" Determination of pharmacokinetic parameters of single-dose and multiple-dose administration, as well as the FK506 concentrations in eye tissues, showed that the FK506 formulation and the dosing regimen ensured the therapeutic concentration of FK506 for treating corneal allograft rejection."( Preparation of 0.05% FK506 suspension eyedrops and its pharmacokinetics after topical ocular administration.
Chen, JQ; Ye, CT; Yuan, J; Zhai, JJ; Zhou, SY, 2009
)
0.35
" Early studies in renal transplantation have provided insight into optimal dosing strategies of sirolimus and of concomitant immunosuppressive agents."( Considerations in sirolimus use in the early and late post-transplant periods.
Elliott, EN; Gaber, AO; Gaber, LW; Knight, RJ; Patel, SJ, 2009
)
0.35
"The population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus was described in 22 pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, and a model-based dosage adjustment tool that may assist with therapy in new patients was developed."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: new initial dosage suggestions and a model-based dosage adjustment tool.
Fasth, A; Friberg, LE; Staatz, CE; Wallin, JE, 2009
)
0.92
" We assayed serum creatinine and tacrolimus blood trough concentrations to calculate the concentration per dosage during follow-up."( Effect of CYP3A5 genotype on renal allograft recipients treated with tacrolimus.
Chen, JS; Cheng, DR; Cheng, Z; Ji, SM; Li, LS; Liu, ZH; Sha, GZ; Sun, QQ; Wen, JQ, 2009
)
0.87
" The CYP3A5*3/*3 group showed the largest concentration per dosage (C/D) and CYP3A5*1/*1, the smallest C/D."( Effect of CYP3A5 genotype on renal allograft recipients treated with tacrolimus.
Chen, JS; Cheng, DR; Cheng, Z; Ji, SM; Li, LS; Liu, ZH; Sha, GZ; Sun, QQ; Wen, JQ, 2009
)
0.59
" Our study suggested to choose the initial dosage according to the CYP3A5 genotype to obtain a better outcome and reduce the incidences of acute rejection episodes and nephrotoxicity."( Effect of CYP3A5 genotype on renal allograft recipients treated with tacrolimus.
Chen, JS; Cheng, DR; Cheng, Z; Ji, SM; Li, LS; Liu, ZH; Sha, GZ; Sun, QQ; Wen, JQ, 2009
)
0.59
" Conditions improved after the cessation of tacrolimus for three days followed by reducing the dosage of voriconazole and tacrolimus."( Voriconazole inhibition of tacrolimus metabolism in a kidney transplant recipient with fluconazole-resistant cryptococcal meningitis.
Chang, CM; Chang, HH; Ko, WC; Lee, HC; Lee, NY; Wu, CJ; Yang, YH, 2010
)
0.92
" To date, this CYP3A5 variant is the only reported genetic factor to predict the appropiate starting dosage of Tac, avoiding overdosing and improving the outcome of renal transplantation."( Pharmacogenetics of calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation.
Coto, E; Tavira, B, 2009
)
0.35
" It is usually based on trough concentration (C(0)) monitoring, but other TDM tools include the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over the (12-hour) dosage interval or the AUC over the first 4 hours post-dose, as well as other single concentration-time points such as the concentration at 2 hours."( Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I.
Marquet, P; Monchaud, C, 2009
)
0.35
"To investigate the tacrolimus dosage requirements and blood concentrations in adult-to-adult right lobe living donor liver transplantation (AALDLT) recipients with small-for-size (SFS) grafts."( Tacrolimus dosage requirements in living donor liver transplant recipients with small-for-size grafts.
Lan, X; Li, B; Li, Y; Liu, F; Wang, WT; Wei, YG; Wen, TF; Xu, MQ; Yan, LN; Yang, JY; Zhao, JC, 2009
)
2.12
" The tacrolimus dosage requirements in group S were significantly lower than group N at 2 wk (2."( Tacrolimus dosage requirements in living donor liver transplant recipients with small-for-size grafts.
Lan, X; Li, B; Li, Y; Liu, F; Wang, WT; Wei, YG; Wen, TF; Xu, MQ; Yan, LN; Yang, JY; Zhao, JC, 2009
)
2.31
"SFS grafts recipients have significantly decreased tacrolimus dosage requirements compared with non-SFS grafts recipients in AALDLT during the first 2 mo post-surgery."( Tacrolimus dosage requirements in living donor liver transplant recipients with small-for-size grafts.
Lan, X; Li, B; Li, Y; Liu, F; Wang, WT; Wei, YG; Wen, TF; Xu, MQ; Yan, LN; Yang, JY; Zhao, JC, 2009
)
2.05
" Close monitoring is required in the management of tacrolimus and sirolimus dosing regimens when combined with ritonavir boosted HIV-1 protease inhibitors."( Effect of coadministered HIV-protease inhibitors on tacrolimus and sirolimus blood concentrations in a kidney transplant recipient.
Barau, C; Blouin, P; Creput, C; Durrbach, A; Furlan, V; Taburet, AM, 2009
)
0.86
"To present the correlation between dosage and plasma concentration of tacrolimus and the consequences for short-term hepatorenal function of conversion to Advagraf (tacrolimus extended-release capsules) in liver transplant recipients."( Evaluation of clinical safety of conversion to Advagraf therapy in liver transplant recipients: observational study.
Alamo-Martinez, JA; Barrera-Pulido, L; Bernal Bellido, C; Gomez-Bravo, MA; Marin-Gomez, LM; Pascasio, JM; Suárez Artacho, G,
)
0.37
" Dosage was adjusted milligram for milligram."( Evaluation of clinical safety of conversion to Advagraf therapy in liver transplant recipients: observational study.
Alamo-Martinez, JA; Barrera-Pulido, L; Bernal Bellido, C; Gomez-Bravo, MA; Marin-Gomez, LM; Pascasio, JM; Suárez Artacho, G,
)
0.13
" Despite no modification of Advagraf dosage during follow-up in most patients, mean tacrolimus levels decreased from the first month after conversion; however, at 6 months after conversion, they tended to equal the initial value."( Evaluation of clinical safety of conversion to Advagraf therapy in liver transplant recipients: observational study.
Alamo-Martinez, JA; Barrera-Pulido, L; Bernal Bellido, C; Gomez-Bravo, MA; Marin-Gomez, LM; Pascasio, JM; Suárez Artacho, G,
)
0.36
" Also a complete 12-hour pharmacokinetic profile was recorded for 15 transplant patients who had the polymorphism and for 15 controls who were randomly chosen since they received the same type and dosage of mycophenolate, same posttransplant time and similar renal function."( The prevalence of uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 1A9 (UGT1A9) gene promoter region single-nucleotide polymorphisms T-275A and C-2152T and its influence on mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in stable renal transplant patients.
Arroyo, M; Barrientos, A; Calvo, N; De la Orden, V; Maestro, ML; Ortega, D; Pérez-Flores, I; Sánchez-Fructuoso, AI; Veganzone, S; Viudarreta, M,
)
0.13
" Three patients were excluded: 1 because of the development of abdominal pain, and 2 because of dosing errors."( Three-month experience with tacrolimus once-daily regimen in stable renal allografts.
Aguado Fernández, S; Alonso Alvarez, M; Baños Gallardo, M; Diez Ojea, B; García Melendreras, S; Gómez Huertas, E,
)
0.43
" No de novo posttransplantation diabetes mellitus was diagnosed; patients with diabetes required similar dosage of hypoglycemia treatment."( Conversion to tacrolimus extended-release formulation: short-term clinical results.
Gallego-Valcarce, E; Gomez-Roldan, C; Llamas-Fuentes, F; Martinez-Fernandez, G; Ortega-Cerrato, A; Perez-Martinez, J,
)
0.49
"Conversion from BID TAC to OD TAC, milligram for milligram, is clinically safe; however, monitoring of tacrolimus concentration in patients receiving low dosage is mandatory to prevent subtherapeutic levels."( Conversion to tacrolimus extended-release formulation: short-term clinical results.
Gallego-Valcarce, E; Gomez-Roldan, C; Llamas-Fuentes, F; Martinez-Fernandez, G; Ortega-Cerrato, A; Perez-Martinez, J,
)
0.71
" Therefore, we analyzed the effect of different dosing patterns of MMF and EC-MPS on IMPDH activity in stable patients after renal transplantation."( Comparison of inosine-monophosphate-dehydrogenase activity in patients with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil after renal transplantation.
Küpper, M; Rath, T,
)
0.13
" In week 2 and 3 posttransplant, a significant adjustment in the ADV dosage was necessary to achieve sufficient tacrolimus trough levels."( Modified release tacrolimus in de novo immunosuppression after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation--a first single-center experience.
Claas, S; Klein, T; Krämer, BK; Krüger, B; Schenker, P; Traska, T; Viebahn, R; Wunsch, A,
)
0.68
" Protocols to reverse nephrotoxicity incorporate dosage reduction or withdrawal of these agents."( Two-year experience with tacrolimus in renal transplantation after late conversion from cyclosporine therapy.
Videla, CO,
)
0.43
" Cyclosporine C0 or C2 levels and CsA dosage had previously been changed simultaneously with ketoconazole."( Two-year experience with tacrolimus in renal transplantation after late conversion from cyclosporine therapy.
Videla, CO,
)
0.43
" Maximum tacrolimus dosage administrated for patients over a 6-month period appeared not to be predictive for the DAS28-CRP remission at 6 months."( Prediction of DAS28-CRP remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tacrolimus at 6 months by baseline variables.
Aoyagi, K; Aramaki, T; Arima, K; Eguchi, K; Fujikawa, K; Furuyama, M; Ida, H; Iwamoto, N; Kamachi, M; Kawakami, A; Kawashiri, SY; Matsuoka, N; Mizokami, A; Nakamura, H; Nakashima, M; Origuchi, T; Tamai, M; Ueki, Y; Yamasaki, S, 2009
)
0.99
" Treatment of active atopic dermatitis lesions with pimecrolimus cream 1% twice daily, followed by the once-daily dosing regimen, was sufficient to prevent subsequent atopic dermatitis relapses over 16 weeks in pediatric patients."( Twice-daily versus once-daily applications of pimecrolimus cream 1% for the prevention of disease relapse in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis.
Aberer, W; Guettner, A; Gunstone, A; Hultsch, T; Kekki, OM; López Estebaranz, JL; Ruer-Mulard, M; Vertruyen, A,
)
0.13
"The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in pediatric kidney transplant patients, identify factors that explain variability, and determine dosage regimens."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus in de novo pediatric kidney transplant recipients.
André, JL; Bensman, A; Brochard, K; Cloarec, S; Cochat, P; Elie, V; Fakhoury, M; Garaix, F; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Leroy, V; Loirat, C; Niaudet, P; Roussey, G; Zhao, W, 2009
)
0.83
" These findings suggest a safer dosing and monitoring of tacrolimus coadministered with rabeprazole early on after liver transplantation regardless of the CYP2C19 and CYP3A5 genotypes of transplant patients and their donors."( Absence of influence of concomitant administration of rabeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult living-donor liver transplant patients: a case-control study.
Hosohata, K; Inui, K; Kaido, T; Masuda, S; Ogura, Y; Oike, F; Sugimoto, M; Takada, Y; Uemoto, S; Yonezawa, A, 2009
)
0.82
" The blood tacrolimus concentration was higher than usual at that time; thus, tacrolimus dosage was reduced."( Reversible myocardial hypertrophy induced by tacrolimus in a pediatric heart transplant recipient: case report.
Hashimoto, S; Ishibashi-Ueda, H; Kato, T; Mano, A; Nakatani, T; Wada, K; Yahata, Y, 2009
)
1
" Dosage is titrated based on blood concentration measurement."( Pharmacodynamic monitoring of calcineurin inhibition therapy: principles, performance, and perspectives.
de Fijter, JW; van Pelt, J; van Rossum, HH, 2010
)
0.36
" Tacrolimus (3 mg) was administered after supper, and blood tacrolimus concentrations were measured just prior to dosing and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h after administration."( Pharmacokinetics of orally administered tacrolimus in lupus nephritis patients.
Asamiya, Y; Itabashi, M; Nitta, K; Sugiura, H; Takei, T; Tsukada, M; Uchida, K, 2010
)
1.54
"MPA TDM-based MMF dosage adjustment enabled us to administer MMF more confidently than categorical dosing."( A clinical assessment of mycophenolate drug monitoring after liver transplantation.
Ahn, CS; Choi, NK; Choi, YI; Ha, TY; Hwang, S; Jung, DH; Kim, KH; Kim, KW; Lee, SG; Moon, DB; Park, GC; Park, PJ; Song, GW; Yu, YD,
)
0.13
" Oral prednisolone dosage was successfully tapered without recurrence, along with decreasing titer of MPO-ANCA."( Improvement of rapidly progressive lupus nephritis associated MPO-ANCA with tacrolimus.
Amano, H; Kanamaru, Y; Kanmaru, Y; Lee, S; Morimoto, S; Ohsawa, I; Takasaki, Y; Tomino, Y; Watanabe, T, 2010
)
0.59
"It was shown in the study that disorders of glucose metabolism induced by FK506 were related to the dosage of FK506."( Effects of different dose of FK506 on endocrine function of pancreatic islets and damage of beta cells of pancreatic islets in a Wistar rat model.
Li, F; Li, Q, 2010
)
0.36
" Blood tacrolimus concentration was well controlled after transplantation, but an approximately threefold increase in the concentration was observed on day 10 even though the dosage was unchanged."( Change in blood tacrolimus concentration by fluctuation of renal function in a bone marrow transplant patient.
Hoshino, N; Ikuno, Y; Konishi, H; Minouchi, T; Sumi, M; Yamaji, A,
)
0.93
" Patients were administered TAC at a dosage of 1-6 mg once daily, followed up for 24 weeks."( Single center prospective study of tacrolimus efficacy and safety in the treatment of various manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Amano, K; Kameda, H; Nagasawa, H; Nishi, E; Okuyama, A; Suzuki, K; Takei, H; Takeuchi, T; Tsuzaka, K, 2011
)
0.65
" IMPDH activity decreased to 75% and 67% at 1 and 2 h after dosing respectively."( Evaluation of inosin-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity during maintenance therapy with tacrolimus.
Maiguma, T; Oishi, R; Okabe, Y; Otsubo, K; Sugitani, A; Tanaka, M; Teshima, D; Yosida, T, 2010
)
0.58
" Voriconazole treatment led to a dramatic increase in tacrolimus concentration that required its discontinuation in spite of the manufacturer's guidelines that recommend a reduction of tacrolimus dosage by one-third."( Effects of voriconazole on tacrolimus metabolism in a kidney transplant recipient.
Basile, V; Capone, D; Ciotola, A; D'Alessandro, V; Federico, S; Gentile, A; Nappi, R; Polichetti, G; Renda, A; Sabbatini, M; Santangelo, M; Tarantino, G, 2010
)
0.91
", and the dosage of immunoinhibitory used was recorded periodically."( [Clinical application and exploration on mechanism of action of Cordyceps sinensis mycelia preparation for renal transplantation recipients].
Ding, CG; Jin, ZK; Tian, PX, 2009
)
0.35
"BLC could effectively protect liver and kidney, stimulate hemopoietic function, improve hypoproteinemia, as well as reduce the incidence of infection and the dosage of CsA and FK506 used, etc."( [Clinical application and exploration on mechanism of action of Cordyceps sinensis mycelia preparation for renal transplantation recipients].
Ding, CG; Jin, ZK; Tian, PX, 2009
)
0.35
" Since crossover PK studies are preferentially carried out using larger animals such as dogs or monkeys that are capable of accepting the same dosage formulations as those for clinical use, we extended our study of co-administration of tacrolimus with multiple h-IFN administrations to beagle dogs in the present study."( Co-administration of tacrolimus suppresses pharmacokinetic modulation of multiple subcutaneously administered human interferon-alpha in Beagle dogs.
Ishida, T; Kamada, N; Kiwada, H; Miyake, M; Mukai, T; Nishibayashi, T; Odomi, M; Yamazaki, H, 2010
)
0.86
" Details of drug dosage history, sampling time and tacrolimus concentration in 63 patients (44 males and 19 females), 27 - 57 years old (age mean 40."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients.
Catic-Djordjevic, A; Djordjevic, V; Jankovic, SM; Milovanovic, JR; Paunovic, G; Velickovic-Radovanovic, R, 2010
)
0.9
"The derived model describes well tacrolimus clearance in terms of characteristics of Serbian kidney transplant patients, offering basis for rational individualization of tacrolimus dosing regimens."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients.
Catic-Djordjevic, A; Djordjevic, V; Jankovic, SM; Milovanovic, JR; Paunovic, G; Velickovic-Radovanovic, R, 2010
)
0.93
"De novo renal transplant patients were randomized to receive intensified dosing of MMF (1."( The CLEAR study: a 5-day, 3-g loading dose of mycophenolate mofetil versus standard 2-g dosing in renal transplantation.
Barama, AA; Cardella, CJ; Dandavino, R; Gourishankar, S; Houde, I; Keown, PA; Kiberd, BA; Landsberg, D; Pirc, L; Shoker, A; Wrobel, MM, 2010
)
0.36
" Further studies are required to determine whether limited intensified MMF dosing can reduce acute rejection."( The CLEAR study: a 5-day, 3-g loading dose of mycophenolate mofetil versus standard 2-g dosing in renal transplantation.
Barama, AA; Cardella, CJ; Dandavino, R; Gourishankar, S; Houde, I; Keown, PA; Kiberd, BA; Landsberg, D; Pirc, L; Shoker, A; Wrobel, MM, 2010
)
0.36
" Subsequently, a prospective study was carried out, patients were randomized to algorithm-predicted dosing or standard dosing."( Effects of diltiazem on pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in relation to CYP3A5 genotype status in renal recipients: from retrospective to prospective.
Chen, SY; Chen, X; Fu, Q; Huang, M; Li, JL; Liu, LS; Teng, LC; Wang, CX; Wang, XD, 2011
)
0.63
" CsA inhibition ranged from 28 to 77% within a dosing interval, whereas it was less than 1% for Tac, considering free concentrations and assuming competitive inhibition."( Cyclosporine A, but not tacrolimus, shows relevant inhibition of organic anion-transporting protein 1B1-mediated transport of atorvastatin.
Amundsen, R; Asberg, A; Christensen, H; Zabihyan, B, 2010
)
0.67
" Fifty percent of the patients received tacrolimus (TRL) and the others cyclosporine (CsA), both dosed according to weight."( Cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation: prophylaxis and preemptive treatment--a single-center experience.
Campanella, L; Cuomo, O; Esposito, C; Ioia, G; Perrella, A; Taglialatela, D, 2010
)
0.63
" Tacrolimus can be safely converted from the twice daily formulation (Prograf) to the same dose (1 mg:1 mg) of once daily dosing tacrolimus (m-Tac)."( Once daily tacrolimus formulation: monitoring of plasma levels, graft function, and cardiovascular risk factors.
Bachetoni, A; Barile, M; Berloco, PB; Meçule, A; Mitterhofer, AP; Nofroni, I; Poli, L; Tinti, F; Umbro, I, 2010
)
1.66
" Tacrolimus once daily Advagraf has been developed to provide a more convenient dosing regimen to improve adherence."( Safety of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf) in stable liver transplant recipients.
Adani, GL; Baccarani, U; Baroni, GS; Bresadola, V; Comuzzi, C; Faraci, MG; Garelli, P; Lorenzin, D; Nicolini, D; Risaliti, A; Rossetto, A; Soardo, G; Toniutto, P, 2010
)
1.54
"Polymorphisms in the drug transporter gene (ABCB1) may play a significant role in individualizing cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (Tac) dosage and subsequently the allograft outcome in renal transplant recipients."( Do drug transporter (ABCB1) SNPs influence cyclosporine and tacrolimus dose requirements and renal allograft outcome in the posttransplantation period?
Kapoor, R; Mittal, RD; Singh, R; Srivastava, A, 2011
)
0.82
" The dosage of FK506 was 2 mg/kg/day."( Effects of immunosuppressant FK-506 on tooth movement.
de Farias, ML; de Mendonça, LM; de Souza, MM; Gonçalves, RT; Martins, MA; Santos, RL, 2010
)
0.36
"This review explores pharmacogenetic knowledge developed over the last decade regarding the impact of ABCB1 polymorphisms on tacrolimus toxicity and dosage requirements in children."( Impact of ATP-binding cassette, subfamily B, member 1 pharmacogenetics on tacrolimus-associated nephrotoxicity and dosage requirements in paediatric patients with liver transplant.
Hawwa, AF; McElnay, JC, 2011
)
0.81
" ABCB1 donor genotypes and ABCB1 expression level in the intestine and leukocytes may be useful in dosage selection."( Impact of ATP-binding cassette, subfamily B, member 1 pharmacogenetics on tacrolimus-associated nephrotoxicity and dosage requirements in paediatric patients with liver transplant.
Hawwa, AF; McElnay, JC, 2011
)
0.6
"CNI dosage was significantly tapered after introduction of 2,000 mg MMF per day."( Sustained renal response to mycophenolate mofetil and CNI taper promotes survival in liver transplant patients with CNI-related renal dysfunction.
Altendorf-Hofmann, A; Büchler, P; Friess, H; Kornberg, A; Kornberg, J; Krause, B; Küpper, B; Sappler, A; Thrum, K; Wilberg, J, 2011
)
0.37
" The median dosage of MMF was 1180 mg/d at the end of follow-up."( Introduction of mycophenolate mofetil in maintenance liver transplant recipients: what can we expect? Results of a 10-year experience.
Adham, M; Boillot, O; Dumortier, J; Guillaud, O; Pittau, G; Salandre, J; Scoazec, JY, 2010
)
0.36
" Unlike cyclosporine, tacrolimus partially suppressed calcineurin activity throughout the dosing interval compared to the pre-dose level (cyclosporine, 62-67% inhibition; tacrolimus, 13-35% inhibition)."( A transient increase of calcineurin phosphatase activity in living-donor kidney transplant recipients with acute rejection.
Fukudo, M; Inui, K; Ito, N; Kamoto, T; Katsura, T; Ogawa, O; Yamamoto, S; Yano, I, 2010
)
0.68
" This difference in apparent oral clearance could be used in future studies to guide initial dosing strategies of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients based on genotype."( A systematic review of the effect of CYP3A5 genotype on the apparent oral clearance of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients.
Barry, A; Levine, M, 2010
)
0.79
" Ranolazine dechallenge on a subsequent admission produced subtherapeutic tacrolimus concentrations requiring dosage increases."( Ranolazine-tacrolimus interaction.
Pierce, DA; Reeves-Daniel, AM, 2010
)
0.98
"The pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (TRL) are clearly affected by genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes, which lead to large interindividual differences in dose-response relations."( Toward personalized medicine in renal transplantation.
Amenabar Iribar, JJ; Arrieta Gutiérrez, A; Gainza de los Rios, FJ; Jofre-Monseny, L; Lampreabe, I; Martinez, A; Olano-Martin, E; Rodriguez, M; Tejedor, D; Zárraga Larrondo, S, 2010
)
0.67
"It has been suggested that for adequate maintenance of tacrolimus levels, the total daily dosage should be increased when switching from the conventional twice-daily regimen tacrolimus (CT) to once-daily sustained-release tacrolimus (SR-T)."( Conversion of heart transplant patients from standard to sustained-release tacrolimus requires a dosage increase.
Barge-Caballero, E; Barge-Caballero, G; Blanco-Canosa, P; Castro-Beiras, A; Crespo-Leiro, MG; Fariñas-Garrido, P; Grille-Cancela, Z; Marzoa-Rivas, R; Mosquera, V; Naya-Leira, C; Paniagua-Martín, MJ; Pedrosa del Moral, V, 2010
)
0.84
"To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a 25% increase in daily dosage when switching heart transplant (HT) patients from CT to SR-T."( Conversion of heart transplant patients from standard to sustained-release tacrolimus requires a dosage increase.
Barge-Caballero, E; Barge-Caballero, G; Blanco-Canosa, P; Castro-Beiras, A; Crespo-Leiro, MG; Fariñas-Garrido, P; Grille-Cancela, Z; Marzoa-Rivas, R; Mosquera, V; Naya-Leira, C; Paniagua-Martín, MJ; Pedrosa del Moral, V, 2010
)
0.59
" Twenty-three patients (31%) required no dosage change in the first 3 months, but 44 (33%) required one or two changes."( Conversion of heart transplant patients from standard to sustained-release tacrolimus requires a dosage increase.
Barge-Caballero, E; Barge-Caballero, G; Blanco-Canosa, P; Castro-Beiras, A; Crespo-Leiro, MG; Fariñas-Garrido, P; Grille-Cancela, Z; Marzoa-Rivas, R; Mosquera, V; Naya-Leira, C; Paniagua-Martín, MJ; Pedrosa del Moral, V, 2010
)
0.59
"Administration of SR-T at a dosage 25% higher than the daily dosage of CT was safe."( Conversion of heart transplant patients from standard to sustained-release tacrolimus requires a dosage increase.
Barge-Caballero, E; Barge-Caballero, G; Blanco-Canosa, P; Castro-Beiras, A; Crespo-Leiro, MG; Fariñas-Garrido, P; Grille-Cancela, Z; Marzoa-Rivas, R; Mosquera, V; Naya-Leira, C; Paniagua-Martín, MJ; Pedrosa del Moral, V, 2010
)
0.59
"Intestinal absorption and metabolism of tacrolimus was significantly affected by the SNPs in the CYP3A5 and MDR1 genes, which may offer a useful tool to optimize tacrolimus dosing after renal transplantation."( Genetic polymorphisms and individualized tacrolimus dosing.
Beltrán Catalán, S; Jiménez Torres, NV; Kanter Berga, J; López-Montenegro Soria, MA; Milara Payá, J; Pallardó Mateu, LM, 2010
)
0.89
"To determine the proportion of patients achieving tacrolimus whole-blood concentrations of ≥10 ng/mL within 3 days of kidney transplantation, after randomization either to standard dosing (control group) or post-transplantation dosing guided by a 2-hour (C(2) ) level following a preoperative tacrolimus dose (T2 group)."( Pre-transplant pharmacokinetic profiling and tacrolimus requirements post-transplant.
Butcher, BE; Campbell, S; Ferrari, P; Hawley, C; Hutchison, B; Irish, A; Walker, R, 2010
)
0.87
" Subsequent dosing in both groups was based upon tacrolimus trough level monitoring."( Pre-transplant pharmacokinetic profiling and tacrolimus requirements post-transplant.
Butcher, BE; Campbell, S; Ferrari, P; Hawley, C; Hutchison, B; Irish, A; Walker, R, 2010
)
0.87
" Age, ethnicity and CYP3A inhibitor use could predict 30% of tacrolimus dosing variability."( Using genetic and clinical factors to predict tacrolimus dose in renal transplant recipients.
Elliott, E; Gaber, AO; Mao, Y; Patel, S; Razo, J; Shea, E; Wang, P; Wong, ST; Wu, AH; Zhou, X, 2010
)
0.86
" Because research in pharmacogenetics already identified polymorphisms impacting their pharmacokinetic parameters in adults, developmental pharmacogenetics of immunosuppressants holds promises for optimizing dosage regimens and improving clinical outcome in children."( Developmental pharmacogenetics of immunosuppressants in pediatric organ transplantation.
Fakhoury, M; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Zhao, W, 2010
)
0.36
" The dosage of tacrolimus was remarkably reduced from day -1 to day 28 when the patient had the CYP3A5 rs4646450 C/C and/or rs776746 G/G genotype (P=0."( Cytochrome P450 genetic polymorphisms influence the serum concentration of calcineurin inhibitors in allogeneic hematopoietic SCT recipients.
Ando, K; Inoko, H; Kawada, H; Kunii, N; Machida, S; Ogawa, Y; Ohgiya, D; Onizuka, M; Toyosaki, M, 2011
)
0.72
"This is the first long-term, randomized trial comparing enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil along with reduced maintenance tacrolimus dosing and steroid avoidance, which resulted in similarly low-BPAR rates, acceptably high renal function at 48 months, and an equivalent side effect profile."( Randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in primary renal transplantation with tacrolimus and steroid avoidance: four-year analysis.
Brown, R; Burke, GW; Chen, L; Ciancio, G; Gaynor, JJ; Guerra, G; Hanson, L; Kupin, W; Roth, D; Ruiz, P; Sageshima, J; Tueros, L; Zarak, A, 2011
)
0.77
" This case suggests that reducing the dosage of immunosuppressive agents can be an effective strategy for GVHD after liver transplantation."( Graft versus host disease after liver transplantation: a case report.
Gao, J; Gao, PJ; Huang, L; Leng, XS; Li, GM; Wang, D; Zhu, JY, 2010
)
0.36
" A liquid dispersion of colloidal TAC and lactose (1:1 ratio by weight) was aerosolized using a vibrating mesh nebulizer and administered via a nose-only dosing chamber."( Preclinical evaluation of tacrolimus colloidal dispersion for inhalation.
Coalson, JJ; O'Donnell, KP; Peters, JI; Talbert, RL; Watts, AB; Williams, RO, 2011
)
0.67
" Recent studies have indicated that a fasting state and administration of a higher dosage of tacrolimus at the beginning of therapy are critical in ensuring that the target trough concentration of the agent is reached."( The use of traditional and newer calcineurin inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease.
Fujii, T; Naganuma, M; Watanabe, M, 2011
)
0.59
" A fixed dosing of MMF often causes bone marrow toxicity or cytomegalovirus antigenemia under the optimal dosing of calcineurin inhibitors."( [Optimal immunosuppressive therapy based on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimetabolites in clinical practice].
Naito, T, 2010
)
0.36
"6 μg/mL, and area under the drug concentration-time curve over a dosing interval (AUC) was 12."( Pharmacokinetics of sotrastaurin combined with tacrolimus or mycophenolic acid in de novo kidney transplant recipients.
Arns, W; Budde, K; Dantal, J; Grinyo, JM; Kovarik, JM; Proot, P; Rostaing, L; Steiger, JU, 2011
)
0.63
" CNI dosage was progressively reduced until discontinuation."( Tolerability of everolimus-based immunosuppression in maintenance liver transplant recipients.
Adham, M; Boillot, O; Dumortier, J; Gagnieu, MC; Giostra, E; Guillaud, O; Mentha, G; Morard, I; Morelon, E; Vallin, M,
)
0.13
" Tacrolimus levels and dosage requirements were compared during and after azole therapy."( Voriconazole and itraconazole in lung transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus (FK 506): efficacy and drug interaction.
Amital, A; Fuks, L; Kramer, MR; Shitrit, D,
)
1.28
"Thirty-one stable kidney transplant patients were converted at the same dosage (1 mg:1 mg)."( Improvement of graft function after conversion to once daily tacrolimus of stable kidney transplant patients.
Bachetoni, A; Barile, M; Berloco, PB; Brunini, F; Meçule, A; Mitterhofer, AP; Nofroni, I; Poli, L; Tinti, F; Umbro, I, 2010
)
0.6
"We switched 54 chronic stable patients (41 males and 13 females) from twice daily dosing with conventional TAC or CsA to once daily dosing with modified release TAC."( Increased adherence after switch from twice daily calcineurin inhibitor based treatment to once daily modified released tacrolimus in heart transplantation: a pre-experimental study.
Celik, S; De Geest, S; Dengler, TJ; Doesch, AO; Ehlermann, P; Erbel, C; Frankenstein, L; Katus, HA; Koch, A; Konstandin, M; Kristen, A; Mueller, S; Zugck, C, 2010
)
0.57
"Patients were randomized to receive either intensified dosing of mycophenolate mofetil (1."( The role of proton pump inhibitors on early mycophenolic acid exposure in kidney transplantation: evidence from the CLEAR study.
Dandavino, R; Gourishankar, S; Keown, P; Kiberd, BA; Wrobel, M, 2011
)
0.37
" Steroid dosage was reduced during the course of the study in 74."( Clinical efficacy and immunological impact of tacrolimus in Chinese patients with generalized myasthenia gravis.
Hu, XQ; Lu, CZ; Lu, JH; Xiao, BG; Zhang, H; Zhang, X; Zhao, CB, 2011
)
0.63
" Because of the potential for a significant interaction between tacrolimus and atazanavir, the tacrolimus dosage was to be based on serum tacrolimus concentrations."( Managing the atazanavir-tacrolimus drug interaction in a renal transplant recipient.
Aull, MJ; Figueiro, JM; Saal, SD; Tsapepas, DS; Webber, AB, 2011
)
0.91
"In a 53-year-old man with HIV infection who underwent renal transplantation, the drug interaction between atazanavir and tacrolimus was managed by modifying the tacrolimus dosage regimen after determining the patient's blood tacrolimus concentration profile."( Managing the atazanavir-tacrolimus drug interaction in a renal transplant recipient.
Aull, MJ; Figueiro, JM; Saal, SD; Tsapepas, DS; Webber, AB, 2011
)
0.88
" All patients with presumptive TIPI were treated with high dosage glucocorticosteroids and one received concomitant immunosuppressants."( Tacrolimus-induced pulmonary injury in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Harigai, M; Ide, H; Jodo, S; Katayama, K; Koike, R; Komano, Y; Matsushima, H; Miwa, Y; Miyasaka, N; Morita, K; Nakamura, H; Nakashima, H; Nanki, T; Natsumeda, M; Sakai, F; Sato, Y; Semba, S; Sugiyama, H; Tanaka, M; Tateishi, M, 2011
)
1.81
" The only prospective, randomized, multicenter trial demonstrated that early taper of mycophenolate dosage to 1 g/day can be utilized without increased risk of rejection, compared with late tapering, but the rejection rate was high (30-40%)."( Impact of Mycophenolate Mofetil Dose Reduction on Allograft Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients on Tacrolimus-Based Regimens: A Systematic Review.
Ensom, MH; Greanya, ED; Su, VCh, 2011
)
0.58
"A pharmacogenetics-based dosing model has been developed for the prediction of the tacrolimus maintenance dose in renal transplant recipients."( Tacrolimus dosing in Chinese renal transplant recipients: a population-based pharmacogenetics study.
Jiang, HX; Li, CJ; Li, L; Li, ZH; Si-Tu, B; Zhang, YJ; Zheng, L, 2011
)
2.04
"Determining IL-10 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms of donors may allow individualized tacrolimus dosage regimens to be determined for liver transplant patients during the early posttransplantation period."( Impact of interleukin-10 gene polymorphisms on tacrolimus dosing requirements in Chinese liver transplant patients during the early posttransplantation period.
Fan, J; Liu, G; Peng, Z; Wang, Z; Zhang, X, 2011
)
0.85
" Because patients with DGF have a higher rate of acute rejection and lower MPA exposure, higher dosing of mycophenolate mofetil in such patients may improve outcome."( How delayed graft function impacts exposure to mycophenolic acid in patients after renal transplantation.
Armstrong, VW; Budde, K; de Fijter, H; Kuypers, D; Mamelok, RD; Oellerich, M; Silva, HT; van Gelder, T, 2011
)
0.37
" This study suggested that a new regimen with lower and narrow target trough levels of tacrolimus or a dosing strategy based on the CYP3A5 genotype is needed to reduce the risk of developing IF."( Factors increasing quantitative interstitial fibrosis from 0 hr to 1 year in living kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus.
Habuchi, T; Horikawa, Y; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Komatsuda, A; Miura, M; Miura, Y; Narita, S; Numakura, K; Obara, T; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Tsuchiya, N; Tsuruta, H, 2011
)
0.8
"5) months and was treated by CsA and prednisone dosage adjustments."( Successful treatment of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis after liver transplantation.
Arvelakis, A; Assis, D; Caldwell, C; Cimsit, B; Emre, S; Kulkarni, S; Schilsky, M; Taddei, T, 2011
)
0.37
" The relationship between Tac-O dosage and trough levels after conversion is not clear."( Tacrolimus trough levels and level-to-dose ratio in stable renal transplant patients converted to a once-daily regimen.
Bachetoni, A; Berloco, PB; Lai, Q; Meçule, A; Mitterhofer, AP; Nofroni, I; Poli, L; Pretagostini, R; Tinti, F; Umbro, I, 2011
)
1.81
" We proposed a systematic classification scheme using FDA-approved drug labeling to assess the DILI potential of drugs, which yielded a benchmark dataset with 287 drugs representing a wide range of therapeutic categories and daily dosage amounts."( FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
Chen, M; Fang, H; Liu, Z; Shi, Q; Tong, W; Vijay, V, 2011
)
0.37
"Prolonged-release tacrolimus was developed to provide a more convenient once-daily dosing that could improve patient adherence."( Efficacy and safety of conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus in a large cohort of stable kidney transplant recipients.
Alonso, A; Burgos, D; Cantarell, C; Fernández, A; Franco, A; Fructuoso, AS; Gentil, MA; Guirado, L; Hernández, D; Huertas, EG; Jiménez, C; Jimeno, L; Lauzurica, R; Mazuecos, A; Osuna, A; Paul, J; Plumed, JS; Rodríguez, A; Ruiz, JC; Torregrossa, JV; Zárraga, S, 2011
)
0.94
"To develop a dosing equation for tacrolimus, using genetic and clinical factors from a large cohort of kidney transplant recipients."( Dosing equation for tacrolimus using genetic variants and clinical factors.
Birnbaum, AK; Brundage, RC; Israni, AK; Jacobson, PA; Oetting, WS; Passey, C, 2011
)
0.97
" This study is important towards individualization of dosing in the clinical setting and may increase the number of patients achieving the target concentration."( Dosing equation for tacrolimus using genetic variants and clinical factors.
Birnbaum, AK; Brundage, RC; Israni, AK; Jacobson, PA; Oetting, WS; Passey, C, 2011
)
0.69
" We previously revealed that higher therapeutic effects were obtained in RA patients and RA model animals when the dosing time of methotrexate was chosen according to the 24-h rhythms to cytokine."( Dosing time-dependency of the arthritis-inhibiting effect of tacrolimus in mice.
Fukuyama, R; Higuchi, S; Ieiri, I; Obayashi, K; To, H; Tomonari, M; Yoshimatsu, H, 2011
)
0.61
"Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is now commonly used in pediatric liver transplant recipients, but no clear recommendations about the dosing regimen have been made for this population."( Optimization of the dosing regimen of mycophenolate mofetil in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
Barau, C; Barrail-Tran, A; Debray, D; Furlan, V; Habes, D; Hemerziu, B; Taburet, AM, 2011
)
0.37
" Initial TAC dosing was equal in all patients and adjusted using therapeutic drug monitoring."( The interactions of age, genetics, and disease severity on tacrolimus dosing requirements after pediatric kidney and liver transplantation.
Brojeni, PY; de Wildt, SN; Koren, G; Nulman, I; Parshuram, C; Soldin, OP; Soldin, SJ; van der Heiden, IP; van Schaik, RH, 2011
)
0.61
" In these patients, age and CYP3A5 genotype were independently associated with TAC dosing requirement."( The interactions of age, genetics, and disease severity on tacrolimus dosing requirements after pediatric kidney and liver transplantation.
Brojeni, PY; de Wildt, SN; Koren, G; Nulman, I; Parshuram, C; Soldin, OP; Soldin, SJ; van der Heiden, IP; van Schaik, RH, 2011
)
0.61
" Discontinuation of tacrolimus, as prompted by the established literature, permitted the patient to eliminate tacrolimus-associated toxicity, whereas its substitution with everolimus and mycofenolic acid allowed the maintenance of immunosuppression while avoiding acute organ rejection and reducing the dosage of corticosteroids."( Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in the Intensive Care Unit after liver transplant: a comparison of our experience with the existing literature.
Boccagni, P; Bortolato, A; Lunardi, N; Manara, R; Ori, C; Rossi, S; Saraceni, E; Segato, M, 2012
)
0.7
" The aims of this study were to investigate CYP3A5 polymorphism's effect on TAC dosing and the age dependency of TAC dosing by testing blood concentrations, and the interaction between steroids and TAC during the first year after tx."( Influence of CYP3A5 polymorphism on tacrolimus maintenance doses and serum levels after renal transplantation: age dependency and pharmacological interaction with steroids.
Argibay, PF; Belloso, WH; Coccia, PA; Costa, L; Ferraris, JR; Ferraris, V; Ghezzi, LF; Jimenez, G; Larriba, JM; Redal, MA, 2011
)
0.64
"This study uses the saphenous nerve crush model in Thy1-YFP mice and serial transcutaneous imaging to evaluate the rate of nerve regeneration under various FK-506 (tacrolimus) dosing regimens and in the presence of transgenic overexpression of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF)."( Evaluation of peripheral nerve regeneration via in vivo serial transcutaneous imaging using transgenic Thy1-YFP mice.
Johnson, PJ; Mackinnon, SE; Sun, HH; Yan, Y, 2011
)
0.56
" Almost all gastroenterologists (97%) used weight-based dosing that was gradually escalated."( How are thiopurines used and monitored by Swedish gastroenterologists when treating patients with inflammatory bowel disease?
Andersson, P; Hindorf, U, 2011
)
0.37
"AEB071 combined with a smaller dosage of Tac may be clinically possible to establish calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) minimization protocol in solid organ transplantation."( The effects of AEB071 (sotrastaurin) with tacrolimus on rat heterotopic cardiac allograft rejection and survival.
Fang, YH; Huh, KH; Joo, DJ; Kim, MS; Kim, YS; Lim, BJ; Suh, H, 2011
)
0.63
" Still, there is no consensus considering the recommended dosing and the therapeutic range of MPA."( Monitoring of mycophenolic acid and kidney function during combined immunosuppressive therapy.
Asztalos, L; Ivády, G; Kappelmayer, J; Kovács, AM; Oláh, AV; Varga, E; Varga, J, 2011
)
0.37
" Further studies are necessary to determine the optimal dosage and duration of the therapies."( Mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus compared with intravenous cyclophosphamide in the induction treatment for active lupus nephritis.
Chen, N; Li, X; Ren, H; Shen, P; Wu, X; Xu, Y; Zhang, Q; Zhang, W, 2012
)
0.68
" At 1, 3 and 6 months after transplantation, tacrolimus doses (mg/kg/day) and trough blood levels (C0) were recorded and the weight-adjusted tacrolimus dosage (mg/kg/day) was calculated."( Influence of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 gene polymorphisms and other factors on tacrolimus dosing in Caucasian liver and kidney transplant patients.
Bertani, T; Caccamo, C; D'Alessandro, N; Gridelli, B; Labbozzetta, M; Notarbartolo, M; Palazzo, U; Polidori, P; Poma, P; Provenzani, A; Salis, P; Vizzini, G, 2011
)
0.85
" A correlation was found between the age at the time of transplant and the tacrolimus dosing requirements (r(s) = -0."( Age and CYP3A5 genotype affect tacrolimus dosing requirements after transplant in pediatric heart recipients.
de Wildt, SN; Gijsen, V; Koren, G; Mital, S; Nulman, I; Soldin, OP; Soldin, SJ; van der Heiden, IP; van Schaik, RH, 2011
)
0.89
"Younger age and CYP3A5 expressor genotype were independently associated with higher dosing requirements and lower tacrolimus concentration/dose ratios."( Age and CYP3A5 genotype affect tacrolimus dosing requirements after transplant in pediatric heart recipients.
de Wildt, SN; Gijsen, V; Koren, G; Mital, S; Nulman, I; Soldin, OP; Soldin, SJ; van der Heiden, IP; van Schaik, RH, 2011
)
0.87
" Catatonic symptoms completely resolved in these patients after reducing the tacrolimus dosage or switching it to alternative immunosuppressants."( Catatonia as a manifestation of tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity in organ transplant patients: a case series.
Chopra, A; Das, P; Huston, J; Kuppuswamy, PS; Li, X; Philbrick, K; Rai, A; Sola, C,
)
0.64
"Based on these results, trough concentration monitoring can be considered an appropriate procedure for routine tacrolimus dosage adjustment in adult LDLT patients."( Significance of trough monitoring for tacrolimus blood concentration and calcineurin activity in adult patients undergoing primary living-donor liver transplantation.
Egawa, H; Fukudo, M; Hashi, S; Inui, K; Kaido, T; Masuda, S; Mori, A; Ogawa, K; Ogura, Y; Sugimoto, M; Uemoto, S; Yano, I; Yoshida, Y; Yoshizawa, A, 2012
)
0.86
" The change of the tacrolimus treatment from Tc to Tc-pr dosing did not effect organ function but seemed to improve glycemic control."( Tacrolimus dose and blood concentration variability in kidney transplant recipients undergoing conversion from twice daily to once daily modified release tacrolimus.
Krawczyk, J; Kurnatowska, I; Nowicki, M; Oleksik, T, 2011
)
2.14
" Improved assay accuracy is required to provide optimized drug dosing and consistent care across transplant centers globally."( The need for standardization of tacrolimus assays.
Armbruster, DA; Buchholz, C; Holt, DW; Johnston, A; Levine, DM; Maine, GT; Mussell, C; O'Connor, G; Tuck, V, 2011
)
0.65
"Limited sampling strategies (LSS) for estimating the area under the curve (AUC(0-12h)) of tacrolimus and optimizing dosage adjustment are not currently used or fully validated in pediatric patients, although the method is of real benefit to children."( Limited sampling strategy for estimating individual exposure of tacrolimus in pediatric kidney transplant patients.
Baudouin, V; Deschênes, G; Fakhoury, M; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Maisin, A; Zhao, W, 2011
)
0.83
" During the 1 -12 months of WC treatment, the Tac dosage was significantly lower in the WC group than in the control group (P<0."( [Study on the clinical application of wuzhi capsule after renal transplantation].
Chen, HZ; Xie, SP; Yan, Q, 2011
)
0.37
"Ointment dosage forms are semi-solid preparations intended for local or transdermal delivery of active substances usually for application to the skin and it is important that they present a homogeneous appearance."( Homogeneity study of ointment dosage forms by infrared imaging spectroscopy.
Carneiro, RL; Poppi, RJ, 2012
)
0.38
"Single-center, open-label randomized trial of 200 primary kidney transplant recipients was performed: (group I, n=100) ATG/Dac (3 ATG, 2 Dac doses) versus (group II, n=100) ATG/alemtuzumab (1 dose each), with maintenance consisting of reduced tacrolimus dosing (rTd), enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), and early corticosteroid withdrawal."( Randomized trial of dual antibody induction therapy with steroid avoidance in renal transplantation.
Brown, R; Burke, GW; Chen, L; Ciancio, G; Gaynor, JJ; Guerra, G; Hanson, L; Kupin, W; Livingstone, AS; Roth, D; Ruiz, P; Sageshima, J; Tueros, L; Zarak, A, 2011
)
0.55
" Use of a pharmacogenetic approach to dosing sirolimus awaits testing and it is unlikely to be useful for ciclosporin or everolimus."( Pharmacogenetic biomarkers: cytochrome P450 3A5.
MacPhee, IA, 2012
)
0.38
"Tacrolimus dosing requirement, normalized by drug levels and expressed as the concentration/dose (C/D) ratio as a surrogate index of tacrolimus bioavailability, was employed to identify four categories of tacrolimus dosing requirement, namely, very high, high, small, and very-small, in very fast, fast, slow, and very slow metabolizers, respectively."( The interactions of age, sex, body mass index, genetics, and steroid weight-based doses on tacrolimus dosing requirement after adult kidney transplantation.
Antoniotti, R; Cena, T; Fenoglio, R; Ferrante, D; Genazzani, A; Magnani, C; Menegotto, A; Quaglia, M; Stratta, P; Terrazzino, S, 2012
)
2.04
" As the tacrolimus dosing requirement increases with increasing tacrolimus clearance through concomitant steroid use, undesirable changes in tacrolimus levels may occur when steroid doses are tapered, predominantly in slow metabolizers."( The interactions of age, sex, body mass index, genetics, and steroid weight-based doses on tacrolimus dosing requirement after adult kidney transplantation.
Antoniotti, R; Cena, T; Fenoglio, R; Ferrante, D; Genazzani, A; Magnani, C; Menegotto, A; Quaglia, M; Stratta, P; Terrazzino, S, 2012
)
1.03
" Simulation studies reveal that in 60% of subjects the current initial standard dose without subsequent dosage adjustments overshoot the desired trough concentration range of 10-20 ng/mL."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplantation: early posttransplantation clearance.
Bergstrand, M; Karlsson, MO; Nydert, PS; Staatz, CE; Wallin, JE; Wilczek, HE, 2011
)
0.66
" This model has the potential to aid therapeutic drug monitoring and was also used to suggest a revised dosing scheme in the intended population."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplantation: early posttransplantation clearance.
Bergstrand, M; Karlsson, MO; Nydert, PS; Staatz, CE; Wallin, JE; Wilczek, HE, 2011
)
0.66
" Broad ADME genotyping was performed on 446 kidney transplant recipients, who had been dosed to a steady state with tacrolimus."( The use of a DNA biobank linked to electronic medical records to characterize pharmacogenomic predictors of tacrolimus dose requirement in kidney transplant recipients.
Basford, M; Bian, A; Birdwell, KA; Choi, L; Cowan, JD; Denny, JC; Grady, B; Haas, DW; Ikizler, TA; Jiang, M; Richardson, DM; Ritchie, MD; Robinson, MP; Stein, CM; Vranic, G; Xu, H, 2012
)
0.8
" The purpose of this study was to investigate whether tacrolimus levels exceed the desired therapeutic range in adult patients being initiated on a dosage regimen and to establish the use of pharmacokinetic concepts to avoid organ rejection and other complications related to tacrolimus over-exposure."( Tacrolimus levels in adult patients with renal transplant.
González-López, EH; Robles-Piedras, AL, 2009
)
2.04
" The release of IFN-γ and IL-1β was also suppressed after single dosing with tacrolimus to colitic mice."( Tacrolimus ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice: implication of interferon-γ and interleukin-1β suppression.
Koshiba, M; Maeda, N; Miyata, K; Okada, Y; Takakura, S, 2011
)
2.04
" In conclusion, our study suggests that ethnic differences exist between Hispanic and non-Hispanic children in TAC PK, and based on our preliminary findings, either a higher or more frequent TAC dosing may be required for effective immunosuppression therapy in Hispanic children."( Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in Hispanic children after kidney transplantation.
Al-Uzri, A; Cherala, G; Munar, MY; Naher, A, 2011
)
1.81
"Promising evidence regarding the anti-scar potential of tacrolimus merits further research to optimize the dosage and the usage of the drug."( Topical application of tacrolimus prevents epidural fibrosis in a rat postlaminectomy model: histopathological and ultrastructural analysis.
Albayrak, B; Demir, N; Gulsen, I; Ismailoglu, O; Tanriover, G, 2011
)
0.93
"Upon administration of steady-state morning tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil doses, 28 patients for whom at least three months had passed after renal transplantation underwent serial blood sample collection over a 12-hour dosing period."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients on a corticosteroid-free regimen.
Al-Khatib, M; Ensom, MH; Greanya, ED; Partovi, N; Poulin, E; Shapiro, RJ, 2012
)
0.96
" Of 112 patients enrolled, 98 were converted to QD dosing (full analysis set [FAS])."( Renal function, efficacy and safety postconversion from twice- to once-daily tacrolimus in stable liver recipients: an open-label multicenter study.
Boillot, O; Sańko-Resmer, J; Thorburn, D; Wolf, P, 2012
)
0.61
" Conversion of kidney transplant patients to increased MPA dosing using EC-MPS 1,440 mg/d, with reduced tacrolimus exposure, appears an effective immunosuppression strategy and may improve renal function."( A multicenter, randomized trial of increased mycophenolic acid dose using enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium with reduced tacrolimus exposure in maintenance kidney transplant recipients.
Barrou, B; Be, F; Cassuto, E; Chaouche, K; Di Giambattista, F; Ducloux, D; Kamar, N; Ladrière, M; Moal, MC; Quéré, S; Rostaing, L; Villemain, F, 2012
)
0.8
" With regard to the ABCB1 and cytochrome P-4503A5, they showed no influence on tacrolimus dosing requirements at 1 week or 1 month after transplant."( Association between tacrolimus concentration and genetic polymorphisms of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 during the early stage after liver transplant in an Iranian population.
Aghdaie, MH; Azarpira, N; Banihashemi, M; Darai, M; Geramizadeh, B; Malekhosseini, SA; Malekpour, Z; Moini, M; Nikeghbalian, S; Rahsaz, M, 2012
)
0.93
"Graceptor is a new modified-release once-daily formulation of tacrolimus with an efficacy and safety profile similar to twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf), as identified by clinical trials, offering a more convenient dosing regimen to improve adherence."( Safety and efficacy of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (prograf) to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (graceptor) in stable kidney transplant recipients.
Hama, K; Hirano, T; Iwamoto, H; Jojima, Y; Katayama, H; Kihara, Y; Konno, O; Nakamura, Y; Shimazu, M; Soga, A; Takeuchi, H; Toraishi, T; Yokoyama, T, 2012
)
0.87
"25 mg/kg BW twice daily tacrolimus and 500 mg twice daily mycophenolic acid would be an appropriate maintenance dosage for conventional pigs."( Oral immunosuppressive medication for growing pigs in transplantation studies.
Jensen-Waern, M; Kruse, R; Lundgren, T, 2012
)
0.69
"More research with calcineurin inhibitor reduction and withdrawal regimens is needed to optimise dosing and timing of calcineurin inhibitor treatment in order to achieve optimal patient and graft survival with a minimum of adverse events."( Calcineurin inhibitor minimisation versus continuation of calcineurin inhibitor treatment for liver transplant recipients.
Chan, AW; Gluud, C; Penninga, L; Steinbrüchel, DA; Wettergren, A, 2012
)
0.38
" The objective of this evaluation was to determine the relationship among changes in hematocrit, albumin, and corticosteroid dosing on the disposition of tacrolimus during 6 months of treatment in renal transplant recipients."( Relationship among changes in hematocrit, albumin and corticosteroid dose on the disposition of tacrolimus during the first six months following renal transplantation.
Domínguez-Ramírez, A; Fuentes-Noriega, I; González-López, EH; Mancilla-Urrea, E; Robles-Piedras, AL; Romano-Moreno, S, 2011
)
0.79
" Tacrolimus was titrated to achieve a trough blood concentration of 4-6 ng/mL, and the dosage of azathioprine was 2 mg/kg/d."( Outcomes of maintenance therapy with tacrolimus versus azathioprine for active lupus nephritis: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
Chen, J; Chen, W; Fu, J; Fu, P; Kong, Y; Li, Z; Liao, Y; Liu, F; Liu, Q; Liu, Z; Lou, T; Tang, X; Yang, Z; Yu, X; Zhang, J, 2012
)
1.56
"73 m(2) for a total dosage of 10 g/1."( Tacrolimus versus intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide therapy in Chinese adults with steroid-resistant idiopathic minimal change nephropathy: a multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized cohort trial.
Chen, J; Li, H; Li, X; Shen, H; Shi, X; Wang, H; Xu, G, 2012
)
1.82
" Administration of boceprevir plus tacrolimus requires significant dose reduction and prolongation of the dosing interval for tacrolimus, with close monitoring of tacrolimus blood concentrations and frequent assessments of renal function and tacrolimus-related side effects."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between the hepatitis C virus protease inhibitor boceprevir and cyclosporine and tacrolimus in healthy volunteers.
Butterton, J; Feng, HP; Gupta, S; Hulskotte, E; O'Mara, E; van Zutven, M; Wagner, J; Xuan, F, 2012
)
0.87
" We pharmacologically evaluated in tacrolimus-treated recipients a novel dosing regimen of MPA with an initial high dose followed by a gradual decrease over time."( Mycophenolate sodium dosing in combination with tacrolimus: pharmacokinetic evaluation of a novel regimen in de novo tacrolimus-treated kidney transplant patients.
Alamartine, E; Basset, T; Berthoux, F; Delavenne, X; Maillard, N; Mariat, C; Mehdi, M; Pons, B; Sauron, C, 2012
)
0.91
"This exploratory study suggests that such a dosing regimen of mycophenolate sodium might quickly offer and sustain an optimal exposure to MPA in tacrolimus-treated kidney transplant patients."( Mycophenolate sodium dosing in combination with tacrolimus: pharmacokinetic evaluation of a novel regimen in de novo tacrolimus-treated kidney transplant patients.
Alamartine, E; Basset, T; Berthoux, F; Delavenne, X; Maillard, N; Mariat, C; Mehdi, M; Pons, B; Sauron, C, 2012
)
0.83
"The incidence of early posttransplant diabetes mellitus and the average dosage of insulin consumption among diabetic recipients were significantly higher in recipients in the standard protocol group than in the 24-hour avoidance group (P < ."( Twenty-four hour steroid avoidance immunosuppressive regimen in liver transplant recipients.
Guo, ZY; Han, M; He, XS; Hu, AB; Ju, WQ; Ling, X; Tai, Q; Wu, LW; Zhu, XF, 2012
)
0.38
" The CYP3A5 phenotype had a significant impact in tacrolimus bioavailability, as wild-type carriers required higher dosing compared to mutated carriers to achieve similar drug trough levels."( CYP3A5 polymorphism in Mexican renal transplant recipients and its association with tacrolimus dosing.
Alberú, J; Castañeda-Hernández, G; Elizondo, G; García-Roca, P; Mancilla Urrea, E; Medeiros, M; Morales-Buenrostro, LE; Ortiz, L; Reyes, H; Rodríguez-Espino, BA; Vásquez-Perdomo, M, 2012
)
0.86
" The developed model could be useful to optimize individual pediatric tacrolimus (PR) dosing regimen in routine clinical practice."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of once daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients.
Baudouin, V; Deschênes, G; Fakhoury, M; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Maisin, A; Storme, T; Zhao, W, 2013
)
0.84
" However, decreasing or stopping cyclosporine dosing reverses measured nephrotoxicity in the vast majority of patients, and some patients with careful monitoring can tolerate very low-dose cyclosporine (<2 mg/kg per day) for longer periods."( Calcineurin inhibitors in chronic urticaria.
Khan, DA; Trojan, TD, 2012
)
0.38
"A reduction in CNI dosage may lead to a decrease in the occurrence of post-transplant malignancy."( Effect of immunosuppressive drugs on spontaneous DNA repair in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Gafter, U; Gafter-Gvili, A; Herman-Edelstein, M; Malachi, T; Ori, Y; Rozen-Zvi, B; Zingerman, B, 2012
)
0.38
" The incidence of calcineurin-inhibitor-induced pain syndrome was related to the dosage of tacrolimus (P > ."( Immunosuppressant-related hip pain after orthotopic liver transplant.
Chen, GH; Fu, BS; He, JW; Jiang, N; Li, H; Wang, GS; Wang, GY; Wang, K; Yang, Y; Zhang, J, 2013
)
0.61
" We increased the dosage of oral PSL up to 30 mg/day, and three courses of mPSL pulse therapy were applied, but these therapies had only limited effect, and his symptoms worsened."( Effective treatment of a 13-year-old boy with steroid-dependent ocular myasthenia gravis using tacrolimus.
Ito, H; Kagami, S; Mori, K; Mori, T; Suzue, M, 2013
)
0.61
"Prospective data are lacking concerning the effect of reduced mycophenolic acid (MPA) dosing on efficacy and the influence of concomitant tacrolimus exposure."( Does reduction in mycophenolic acid dose compromise efficacy regardless of tacrolimus exposure level? An analysis of prospective data from the Mycophenolic Renal Transplant (MORE) Registry.
Chan, L; Doria, C; Greenstein, S; Langone, A; Narayanan, M; Pankewycz, O; Sankari, B; Shihab, F; Ueda, K,
)
0.56
" Estimated oral clearances of IT decreased on average by 50%, requiring reduced dosing regimens."( Practical management of boceprevir and immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus recurrence.
Antonini, TM; Barau, C; Bonhomme-Faivre, L; Coilly, A; Duclos-Vallée, JC; Furlan, V; Noël, C; Roche, B; Roque-Afonso, AM; Samuel, D; Taburet, AM, 2012
)
0.38
" The effective dosage in this study was 2-3 mg/day for patients with complete or partial response to tacrolimus."( Low-dose tacrolimus in treating lupus nephritis refractory to cyclophosphamide: a prospective cohort study.
Chen, H; Fei, Y; Hou, Y; Li, M; Wu, Q; Xu, D; Zeng, X; Zhang, F; Zhang, W; Zhang, X; Zhao, Y,
)
0.76
"Our results suggested tacrolimus at low dosage and serum level to be potentially effective and safe for treatment in patients with LN resistant to sufficient CYC therapy."( Low-dose tacrolimus in treating lupus nephritis refractory to cyclophosphamide: a prospective cohort study.
Chen, H; Fei, Y; Hou, Y; Li, M; Wu, Q; Xu, D; Zeng, X; Zhang, F; Zhang, W; Zhang, X; Zhao, Y,
)
0.86
" Tacrolimus (FK-506) was administered at an initial dosage of 1 mg every 12 hours, and FK-506 concentration in the blood was monitored monthly."( Tacrolimus on Kimura's disease: a case report.
Bing, G; Da-Long, S; Wei, R; Xiang-Zhen, L; Xin, L; Yun-Yan, Z, 2014
)
2.76
" This study highlights the importance of achieving early target exposure and suggests a potential role for individualized initial dosing or early therapeutic monitoring of all three immunosuppressive agents."( Kidney transplant outcomes are related to tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid and prednisolone exposure in the first week.
Barraclough, KA; Campbell, SB; Hawley, CM; Isbel, NM; Johnson, DW; Leary, DR; Lee, KJ; McWhinney, BC; Staatz, CE; Ungerer, JP, 2012
)
0.64
" Further studies are needed to determine optimal dosing of CNIs in the elderly."( Lower calcineurin inhibitor doses in older compared to younger kidney transplant recipients yield similar troughs.
Guan, W; Israni, A; Jacobson, PA; Leduc, R; Matas, AJ; Oetting, WS; Schladt, D, 2012
)
0.38
" Intensified dosing with the equivalent of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 3 g daily in tacrolimus-treated patients has been shown to increase exposure however about 15% remain below the lower therapeutic threshold of MPA area under the curve (AUC) of 30 mg · hr⁻¹ · L⁻¹ early post transplant."( Limits to intensified mycophenolate mofetil dosing in kidney transplantation.
Daley, C; Kiberd, BA; Lawen, J, 2012
)
0.6
" If intensified MPA dosing is considered, exceeding 3 g daily in tacrolimus-treated patients provides no added benefit."( Limits to intensified mycophenolate mofetil dosing in kidney transplantation.
Daley, C; Kiberd, BA; Lawen, J, 2012
)
0.62
"Blood, plasma, and urine samples were collected over 1 steady-state dosing interval from women treated with oral tacrolimus during early to late pregnancy (n = 10) and postpartum (n = 5)."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus during pregnancy.
Calamia, JC; Davis, CL; Easterling, TR; Hebert, MF; Miodovnik, M; Shen, DD; Thummel, KE; Umans, JG; Zheng, S, 2012
)
0.91
" Both drugs are dosed orally and have common intestinal and hepatic metabolism and intestinal transport mechanisms."( The evaluation of potential pharmacokinetic interaction between sirolimus and tacrolimus in healthy volunteers.
Korth-Bradley, J; Matschke, K; Parks, V; Patat, A; Tortorici, MA, 2013
)
0.62
" However, due to the complexity of anti-rejection immunosuppressive therapy dosing, we suggest that sirolimus and tacrolimus concentration monitoring be performed when changes in dosing are made for either drug regimen."( The evaluation of potential pharmacokinetic interaction between sirolimus and tacrolimus in healthy volunteers.
Korth-Bradley, J; Matschke, K; Parks, V; Patat, A; Tortorici, MA, 2013
)
0.83
"To predict simultaneously the area under the concentration-time curve during one dosing interval [AUC(0,12 h)] for mycophenolic acid (MPA) and tacrolimus (TAC), when concomitantly used during the first month after transplantation, based on common blood samples."( Statistical tools for dose individualization of mycophenolic acid and tacrolimus co-administered during the first month after renal transplantation.
Capron, A; De Meyer, M; Delattre, IK; Haufroid, V; Mourad, M; Musuamba, FT; Verbeeck, RK; Wallemacq, P, 2013
)
0.82
" The narrow interindividual variability of Tac-QD pharmacokinetics and its difference between CYP3A5 expressers and nonexpressers might contribute to a dosing strategy based on CYP3A5 genotype."( Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of once- and twice-daily tacrolimus in the early stage after renal transplantation.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Miura, M; Narita, S; Niioka, T; Numakura, K; Saito, M; Satoh, S; Tsuchiya, N, 2012
)
0.61
" Data were also collected on the percentage of patients who required dosage titration, drug cost savings, and rates of reversion to brand-name tacrolimus, biopsy-proved acute allograft rejections, and mortality."( Evaluation of clinical and safety outcomes associated with conversion from brand-name to generic tacrolimus in transplant recipients enrolled in an integrated health care system.
Chan, J; Hui, RL; Nguyen, LM; Spence, MM, 2012
)
0.8
" Since dosage titration may be required, close therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended."( Evaluation of clinical and safety outcomes associated with conversion from brand-name to generic tacrolimus in transplant recipients enrolled in an integrated health care system.
Chan, J; Hui, RL; Nguyen, LM; Spence, MM, 2012
)
0.6
" These risk factors for TMA suggest that when using a SIR/TAC regimen for GVHD prophylaxis, careful monitoring and adjustment of the sirolimus dosage is critical, particularly in patients with active aGVHD."( Thrombotic microangiopathy associated with sirolimus level after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with tacrolimus/sirolimus-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis.
Forman, SJ; Khaled, SK; Khuu, T; Liu, X; Nakamura, R; Palmer, J; Parker, PM; Shayani, S; Stiller, T; Thomas, SH, 2013
)
0.6
" There was a tendency toward a slow elevation and a higher dosage requirement in the tacrolimus QD group, compared with the tacrolimus BID group in the early stages, though the required dosages decreased steadily."( One-year follow-up of treatment with once-daily tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant.
Kawanami, S; Kitada, H; Kurihara, K; Masutani, K; Miura, Y; Nishiki, T; Okabe, Y; Tanaka, M; Terasaka, S; Tuchimoto, A, 2012
)
0.86
" Monitoring trough levels helps not only in reducing nephrotoxiicity but also in reducing the chances of acute rejection; although there is no international consensus, the trough concentration is used to determine dosing and the AUC for calculating the exposure of the patient to the drug."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult renal transplant recipients.
Madhavarapu, M; Mayur, P; Naik, P; Nayak, KS; Sritharan, V, 2012
)
0.7
"Trough level determination and a C2, C4 two-point limited sampling strategy may be useful to plan the dosing strategy and estimate the exposure of renal transplant patients to tacrolimus."( Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult renal transplant recipients.
Madhavarapu, M; Mayur, P; Naik, P; Nayak, KS; Sritharan, V, 2012
)
0.9
" Understanding TAC and MMF exposure in the context of corticosteroid-sparing protocols should allow for improved dosing of immunosuppressants and better management of posttransplant patients."( Effect of corticosteroid withdrawal on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil exposure in a randomized multicenter study.
Fitzsimmons, W; Gaber, AO; Henning, AK; Holman, J; Lee, ST; Pirsch, JD; Reisfield, R; Shihab, FS; Smith, LD; Woodle, ES, 2013
)
0.66
" The daily dosage of PSL could be significantly reduced in both PM and DM after starting TAC compared with before."( Coadministration of tacrolimus with corticosteroid accelerates recovery in refractory patients with polymyositis/ dermatomyositis: a retrospective study.
Ikeda, S; Ishii, W; Matsuda, M; Shimojima, Y; Tazawa, K, 2012
)
0.7
" It can be used as a routine procedure to perform AUC-based tacrolimus(PR) dosage optimization in pediatric renal transplant patients."( Limited sampling strategy using Bayesian estimation for estimating individual exposure of the once-daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus in kidney transplant children.
Baudouin, V; Deschênes, G; Fakhoury, M; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Maisin, A; Storme, T; Zhao, W, 2013
)
0.83
" This present study aimed to conduct the selective delivery of FK506 to damaged regions, while at the same time reducing the dosage of FK506, by using a liposomal drug delivery system."( Treatment of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury with PEGylated liposomes encapsulating FK506.
Agato, Y; Asai, T; Fukuta, T; Ishii, T; Minamino, T; Oku, N; Oyama, D; Shimizu, K; Yasuda, N, 2013
)
0.39
"A pretransplantation pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in these patients was developed, and a posttransplantation dosing advice was established for each individual patient."( Pretransplantation pharmacokinetic curves of tacrolimus in HIV-infected patients on ritonavir-containing cART: a pilot study.
Crommelin, HA; Mudrikova, T; van den Broek, MP; van Maarseveen, EM; van Zuilen, AD, 2013
)
0.91
"These preliminary data suggest that the use of MSCs could provide potential benefits in renal transplantation by reducing the dosage of conventional immunosuppressive drug that is required to maintain long-term graft survival and function."( Donor-derived mesenchymal stem cells combined with low-dose tacrolimus prevent acute rejection after renal transplantation: a clinical pilot study.
Chen, X; Chen, Z; Fang, J; Ke, M; Li, G; Li, X; Liao, D; Liu, L; Ma, J; Pan, G; Peng, Y; Xia, W; Xiang, AP; Xu, L, 2013
)
0.63
" A once-daily, modified-release oral formulation of tacrolimus has been developed to simplify dosing and improve medication adherence."( Improved adherence to tacrolimus once-daily formulation in renal recipients: a randomized controlled trial using electronic monitoring.
Dobbels, F; Kanaan, N; Kianda, MN; Kristanto, P; Kuypers, DR; Peeters, PC; Sennesael, JJ; Vanrenterghem, Y; Vrijens, B, 2013
)
0.96
" Electronically compiled dosing histories provide detailed data on patient adherence that can be used for efficient medication management."( Improved adherence to tacrolimus once-daily formulation in renal recipients: a randomized controlled trial using electronic monitoring.
Dobbels, F; Kanaan, N; Kianda, MN; Kristanto, P; Kuypers, DR; Peeters, PC; Sennesael, JJ; Vanrenterghem, Y; Vrijens, B, 2013
)
0.7
" Full pharmacokinetic profiles of sirolimus within a single dosing interval were collected."( Sirolimus pharmacokinetics in early postmyeloablative pediatric blood and marrow transplantation.
Bunin, N; Goyal, RK; Grupp, SA; Han, K; Mada, SR; Pulsipher, MA; Venkataramanan, R; Wall, DA, 2013
)
0.39
" In a comparison of the relative potency of each drug at different dosing ranges, tacrolimus had the strongest Th1 inhibitory effect (median inhibition of interferon-γ at 97."( Comparison of the effect of standard and novel immunosuppressive drugs on CMV-specific T-cell cytokine profiling.
Broscheit, C; Egli, A; Humar, A; Kumar, D; O'Shea, D, 2013
)
0.62
" The clinical titration of dosage to maintain whole blood tacrolimus trough concentrations in the usual therapeutic range can lead to elevated unbound concentrations and possibly toxicity in pregnant women with anemia and hypoalbuminemia."( Interpreting tacrolimus concentrations during pregnancy and postpartum.
Davis, CL; Easterling, TR; Hays, K; Hebert, MF; Miodovnik, M; Shen, DD; Thummel, KE; Umans, JG; Zheng, S, 2013
)
1
" Our aim was to test whether the DeKAF dosing algorithm could predict estimated tacrolimus clearance in renal transplant recipients at our centre."( A published pharmacogenetic algorithm was poorly predictive of tacrolimus clearance in an independent cohort of renal transplant recipients.
Borgulya, G; Boughton, O; Cecconi, M; Fredericks, S; MacPhee, IA; Moreton-Clack, M, 2013
)
0.86
"Demographic characteristics, concomitant medications, tacrolimus dosing information, and steady-state venous whole blood specimen values after tacrolimus administration were collected."( Sublingual tacrolimus: a pharmacokinetic evaluation pilot study.
Amann, S; Aull, M; Benkert, S; Cremers, S; Dadhania, D; Delfin, M; Kapur, S; Levine, D; Saal, S; Tsapepas, D, 2013
)
1.03
" When the rapamycin dosage is limiting, mTOR inhibition of S6K phosphorylation can be enhanced by FKBP51 overexpression in mammalian cells, whereas FKBP12 is dispensable."( Large FK506-binding proteins shape the pharmacology of rapamycin.
Bracher, A; Fabian, AK; Hausch, F; Kozany, C; März, AM, 2013
)
0.39
"Mizoribine (MZR) was approved in 1984 in Japan for the suppression of rejection in renal transplantation with an approved administration dosage of 1-3 mg/kg/day."( Randomized comparative trial of mizoribine versus mycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus for living donor renal transplantation.
Akiyama, T; Amada, N; Takahara, S; Takahashi, K; Tanabe, K; Toma, H; Uchida, K, 2013
)
0.61
" To reduce this incidence, in most studies, induction therapy with depleting anti-T-lymphocyte antibodies is coupled with a reduction of the dosage of the calcineurin inhibitor."( Effect of a single intraoperative high-dose ATG-Fresenius on delayed graft function in donation after cardiac-death donor renal allograft recipients: a randomized study.
Abrahams, AC; Hilbrands, LB; Hoitsma, AJ; Kho, MM; Sanders, JS; van den Hoogen, MW; van Dijk, M; van Zuilen, AD; Weimar, W, 2013
)
0.39
" A dosing equation was fit based on above data with CYP3A5 genotype and diltiazem co-administration as variables."( Individualization of tacrolimus dosage basing on cytochrome P450 3A5 polymorphism--a prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Chen, SY; Fu, Q; Huang, M; Li, J; Li, JL; Liu, LS; Liu, T; Meng, FH; Wang, CX; Wang, XD,
)
0.45
" In a suspected case, the doctor was recommended to discontinue, decrease the dosage or keep the drug under observation; and a follow-up of the patient's platelet count was made in order to classify the relationship between the drug and thrombocytopenia."( [Incidence of drug-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients].
Álvarez-Arroyo, L; Delgado-Sánchez, O; Seco-Melantuche, R,
)
0.13
" The doctor was recommended to discontinue the drug (2), decrease the dosage (3) or keep it under observation (3), with 100% acceptance."( [Incidence of drug-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients].
Álvarez-Arroyo, L; Delgado-Sánchez, O; Seco-Melantuche, R,
)
0.13
" The aim of this study was to determine the role of CYP3A4FNx011B on tacrolimus dosing and clinical outcome in liver transplant recipients."( Cytochrome P450 3A4FNx011B as pharmacogenomic predictor of tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and clinical outcome in the liver transplant recipients.
Albekairy, A; Alkatheri, A; Fujita, S; Hemming, A; Howard, R; Karlix, J; Reed, A,
)
0.61
"A simplified dosing regimen may improve drug compliance in kidney transplant recipients and long-term graft outcomes."( Once-daily extended-release versus twice-daily standard-release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review.
Chapman, JR; Craig, JC; Ho, ET; Wong, G, 2013
)
0.63
" We hypothesize that these differences in dosing requirement may be due to an interethnic polymorphism in the expression of enzymes involved in tacrolimus metabolism."( Tacrolimus therapeutic drug monitoring in Tunisian renal transplant recipients: effect of post-transplantation period.
Aloui, S; Aouam, K; Ben Fredj, N; Boughattas, NA; Chaabane, A; Chadly, Z; Hammouda, M; Skhiri, H, 2013
)
2.03
" Determination of the ABCC2 as well as CYP3A5 genotype may be useful for more accurate tacrolimus dosage adjustment."( Multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2/ABCC2) haplotypes significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.
Akhlaghi, F; Chitnis, SD; Christians, U; Gohh, RY; Ogasawara, K, 2013
)
0.82
" The selection of the optimum SMEDDS Tac composition might have advantage as an alternative oral dosage form for Tac."( Pharmacokinetics of a self-microemulsifying drug delivery system of tacrolimus.
Gruber, M; Hirt, SW; Kunz, W; Lehle, K; Schmid, C; Touraud, D; von Suesskind-Schwendi, M, 2013
)
0.63
"The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus (Zortress®, Certican®) was recently approved in the USA and a number of EU countries for use in combination with a reduced dosage of tacrolimus and corticosteroids for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in adult liver transplant recipients."( Everolimus: a guide to its use in liver transplantation.
Keating, GM; Lyseng-Williamson, KA, 2013
)
0.58
" In clinical practice optimal dosing is difficult to achieve due to important inter- and intraindividual variation in CNI pharmacokinetics."( From gut to kidney: transporting and metabolizing calcineurin-inhibitors in solid organ transplantation.
Knops, N; Kuypers, D; Levtchenko, E; van den Heuvel, B, 2013
)
0.39
"Forty-seven patients completed LCP-Tacro dosing per protocol."( Conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus capsules to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT): a phase 2 trial of stable renal transplant recipients.
Alloway, RR; Bodziak, K; Bunnapradist, S; Gaber, AO; Kaplan, B, 2013
)
0.68
" The greater bioavailability of LCP-Tacro allows for once-daily dosing and similar (AUC) exposure at a dose approximately 30% less than the total daily dose of Prograf."( Conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus capsules to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT): a phase 2 trial of stable renal transplant recipients.
Alloway, RR; Bodziak, K; Bunnapradist, S; Gaber, AO; Kaplan, B, 2013
)
0.68
" The resulting dosing, taking, and timing compliance rates of the patients were higher during the once-daily dosing period."( Increased medication compliance of liver transplant patients switched from a twice-daily to a once-daily tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen.
Eberlin, M; Krämer, I; Otto, G,
)
0.35
" In addition to restricting water intake and administering hypertonic sodium, the tacrolimus dosage was reduced, resulting in alleviation of SIADH."( Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion induced by tacrolimus following allogeneic cord blood transplantation.
Arai, Y; Kadowaki, N; Kitano, T; Kondo, T; Takaori-Kondo, A; Yamashita, K, 2013
)
0.85
" On the morning of study Day 8, the total daily doses for patients were converted to Tac-OD on a 1:1 basis and maintained on a once-daily morning dosing regimen."( Conversion of twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus formulation in stable pediatric kidney transplant recipients: pharmacokinetics and efficacy.
Ahn, S; Ha, IS; Ha, J; Hong, HJ; Kang, HG; Kim, SJ; Kim, SM; Min, SI; Min, SK; Park, DD; Park, T, 2013
)
0.69
"A prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus (Tacrolimus QD) was developed to allow once-daily dosing and to have similar safety and efficacy profiles to twice-daily tacrolimus (Tacrolimus BID)."( Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pathology for low-dose tacrolimus once-daily and twice-daily in living kidney transplantation: prospective trial in once-daily versus twice-daily tacrolimus.
Honda, K; Ishida, H; Omoto, K; Shimizu, T; Tanabe, K; Tanabe, T; Tsuchiya, T, 2013
)
0.91
" Each pharmacokinetic profile consisted of eight blood samples collected during the 12-hour dosing interval."( Limited sampling strategy of mycophenolic acid in adult kidney transplant recipients: influence of the post-transplant period and the pharmacokinetic profile.
Aouam, K; Ben Fredj, N; Boughattas, N; Chaabane, A; Chadly, Z; El May, M; Hammouda, M; Skhiri, H, 2013
)
0.39
" Dosage tapering lasted 3-9 months; in one center dose tapering lasted for less than 3 months."( [Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis in Piedmont and the Aosta Valley in Italy: case study and treatment].
Amore, A; Besso, L; Ferro, M; Giacchino, F; Manganaro, M; Quaglia, M; Rollino, C; Savoldi, S,
)
0.13
" We conclude that in Caucasian Spanish LT patients, a native or graft-borne CYP3A5*1 allele tends to lower tacrolimus concentrations and increase dosage needs, but has no significant impact on the incidence of BPAR."( Impact of donor and recipient CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms on tacrolimus dosage requirements and rejection in Caucasian Spanish liver transplant patients.
Alamo, JM; Brunet, M; Castellote, J; Fondevila, C; Gómez-Bravo, MA; Millán, O; Pons, JA; Rufian, S; Salcedo, M; Suarez, F, 2013
)
0.84
" Age and tacrolimus dosage are independent risk factors for new onset diabetes mellitus after transplant in our patients."( New onset diabetes and impaired fasting glucose after liver transplant: risk analysis and the impact of tacrolimus dose.
Eshraghian, A; Janghorban, P; Lankarani, KB; Malek-Hosseini, SA; Nikeghbalian, S, 2014
)
1.03
" Outcomes evaluated included the percentage of patients requiring a dosage change, absolute change in average tacrolimus trough level, and frequency of biopsy-proven acute rejection within six months of discharge."( Clinical outcomes associated with conversion from brand-name to generic tacrolimus in hospitalized kidney transplant recipients.
Emre, S; Formica, RN; Heavner, MS; Kulkarni, S; Tichy, EM; Yazdi, M, 2013
)
0.83
" There were no significant differences between the brand and generic groups with respect to dosage adjustments required or trough tacrolimus levels at any point in the transition of care."( Clinical outcomes associated with conversion from brand-name to generic tacrolimus in hospitalized kidney transplant recipients.
Emre, S; Formica, RN; Heavner, MS; Kulkarni, S; Tichy, EM; Yazdi, M, 2013
)
0.83
" Tacrolimus dosage adjustments were common throughout the transitions of care, regardless of the formulation used."( Clinical outcomes associated with conversion from brand-name to generic tacrolimus in hospitalized kidney transplant recipients.
Emre, S; Formica, RN; Heavner, MS; Kulkarni, S; Tichy, EM; Yazdi, M, 2013
)
1.53
"The dosage of immunosuppressants had to be reduced significantly (TAC: 30-fold; CSA 3,5-fold)."( [HCV reinfection after liver transplantation - management and first experiences with telaprevir-based triple therapy].
Gerken, G; Herzer, K; Jochum, C; Papadopoulos-Köhn, A; Paul, A; Timm, J, 2013
)
0.39
" Tacrolimus is the basic immunosuppressant for patients after a liver transplant and thanks to its prolonged-release dosage form, which due to its simplicity and reliability of use, replaces tacrolimus twice daily early after the transplant and in the longterm administration, will apparently, for a while, defend its position."( [Immunosuppression after liver transplant, now and in future].
Trunečka, P, 2013
)
1.3
"We conducted a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial in 187 kidney transplant recipients to evaluate the impact of VGCV dosing and renal function on the development of CMV infection."( Critical analysis of valganciclovir dosing and renal function on the development of cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplantation.
Chavin, K; Chua, E; Pilch, N; Posadas Salas, MA; Taber, DJ; Thomas, B, 2013
)
0.39
" VGCV dosing was appropriate for most patients, in those who did and did not develop CMV infection."( Critical analysis of valganciclovir dosing and renal function on the development of cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplantation.
Chavin, K; Chua, E; Pilch, N; Posadas Salas, MA; Taber, DJ; Thomas, B, 2013
)
0.39
"Our study confirms the decreased CYP3A4 activity toward Tac for CYP3A4*22 carriers early after transplantation and provides evidence for refining genotype-based dosage by adding the CYP3A4*22 genotype information to the CYP3A5*3 allelic status."( Impact of CYP3A4*22 allele on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in early period after renal transplantation: toward updated genotype-based dosage guidelines.
Capron, A; De Meyer, M; De Pauw, L; Eddour, DC; Elens, L; Haufroid, V; Latinne, D; Mourad, M; van Schaik, RH; Wallemacq, P, 2013
)
0.68
"The concentration of tacrolimus was detected by enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique, and was adjusted by weight and dosage to C/D ratios."( [Association of CYP3A5 and MDR1 genetic polymorphisms with the blood concentration of tacrolimus in Chinese liver and renal transplant recipients].
Liang, DR; Liang, MZ; Miao, J; Sun, JY; Wang, XG; Wang, YP; Zou, YG, 2013
)
0.93
" Modern dosing of glucocorticoid-free immunosuppression with low-dose tacrolimus and sirolimus does not induce insulin resistance in this population."( Improvement in insulin sensitivity after human islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes.
Dalton-Bakes, C; Ferguson, JF; Fuller, C; Kong, SM; Naji, A; Reilly, MP; Rickels, MR; Teff, KL, 2013
)
0.62
"The aims of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in adult kidney transplant recipients, to use this model to compare cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) genotype-based initial dosing of tacrolimus with standard per-kilogram-based dosing, and to predict the best starting dose of tacrolimus based on patient genotype to achieve a trough concentration between 6 and 10 µg/L by day 5 posttransplantation."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult kidney transplant patients: impact of CYP3A5 genotype on starting dose.
Barraclough, KA; Bergmann, TK; Hennig, S; Isbel, NM; Staatz, CE, 2014
)
0.92
" Tacrolimus dosing regimens were compared by predicting tacrolimus trough concentrations in a simulated data set by running NONMEM with population parameters fixed at the final model estimates."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult kidney transplant patients: impact of CYP3A5 genotype on starting dose.
Barraclough, KA; Bergmann, TK; Hennig, S; Isbel, NM; Staatz, CE, 2014
)
1.6
" In a recent study in adults, POR*28 was associated with increased dosing requirements early after transplant of CYP3A5-expressing kidney transplant recipients."( P450 oxidoreductase *28 (POR*28) and tacrolimus disposition in pediatric kidney transplant recipients--a pilot study.
de Wildt, SN; Gijsen, VM; Koren, G; Nulman, I; Soldin, OP; Soldin, SJ; van Schaik, RH, 2014
)
0.68
"Following organ engraftment, initial dosing of tacrolimus is based on recipient weight and adjusted by measured C(0) concentrations."( Inclusion of CYP3A5 genotyping in a nonparametric population model improves dosing of tacrolimus early after transplantation.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Bremer, S; Hartmann, A; Jelliffe, R; Midtvedt, K; Neely, MN; Størset, E; van Guilder, M, 2013
)
0.87
" Developed model demonstrates the feasibility of estimation of individual tacrolimus clearance and may allow rational individualization of tacrolimus dosing in kidney transplant patients."( Total plasma protein effect on tacrolimus elimination in kidney transplant patients--population pharmacokinetic approach.
Golubović, B; Kovačević, SV; Miljković, B; Prostran, M; Radivojević, D; Vučićević, K, 2014
)
0.92
" A randomised controlled study in kidney transplant recipients has demonstrated that a CYP3A5 genotype-based approach to tacrolimus dosing leads to more patients reaching the target concentration early after transplantation."( The role of pharmacogenetics in the disposition of and response to tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation.
Bouamar, R; Elens, L; Hesselink, DA; van Gelder, T; van Schaik, RH, 2014
)
0.85
"Because LC-MRM-MS is commonly used in routine clinical dosage of drugs, this CN activity assay could be applied, with parallel blood drug concentration monitoring, to a large panel of patients to reevaluate the validity of PBMC CN activity monitoring."( Calcineurin activity assay measurement by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in the multiple reaction monitoring mode.
Carr, L; Essig, M; Gagez, AL; Gastinel, LN; Marquet, P; Sauvage, FL, 2014
)
0.4
" Physical examinations, hematology, urine analysis and serum chemistry tests were performed at screening and before dosing in each period and at end of the study."( Prograf five milligrams versus Tacrolimus medis in healthy volunteers: a bioequivalence study.
Attia, M; Baassoumi, D; Bellahirich, W; Boujbel, L; Masri, M; Matha, V; Rizk, S, 2013
)
0.68
" To achieve these levels, AA RTRs require a significantly higher dosage of TAC compared to C patients (5."( African American renal transplant recipients (RTR) require higher tacrolimus doses to achieve target levels compared to white RTR: does clotrimazole help?
Dayton, M; Feng, L; Kohli, R; Laftavi, MR; Nader, N; Pankewycz, O; Patel, S; Said, M, 2013
)
0.63
" Sudden hearing loss occurred under high serum levels of tacrolimus, and after dosage correction of tacrolimus pure-tone audiometry ruled out hearing loss progression for each patient."( Sudden hearing loss associated with tacrolimus after pediatric renal transplant.
Aydin, E; Baskin, E; Bayrakci, U; Gulleroglu, K; Haberal, M; Moray, G; Ozluoglu, L, 2013
)
0.91
" In transplant recipients not infected with HIV, tacrolimus (TAC) trough levels (C0) or cyclosporine (CsA) drawn at C0 or 2 hours after dosing (C2) correlate with drug exposure (area under the curve [AUC]/dose) and outcomes."( Best single time point correlations with AUC for cyclosporine and tacrolimus in HIV-infected kidney and liver transplant recipients.
Barin, B; Benet, LZ; Browne, M; Frassetto, LA; Roland, M; Stock, PG; Tan-Tam, CC; Wolfe, AR, 2014
)
0.89
" Genotyping is an attractive option especially for the initiation of the dosing of tacrolimus; also, unlike phenotypic tests, the genotype is a stable characteristic that needs to be determined only once for any given gene."( Pharmacogenetic considerations for optimizing tacrolimus dosing in liver and kidney transplant patients.
D'Alessandro, N; Labbozzetta, M; Mathis, E; Notarbartolo, M; Polidori, C; Polidori, P; Poma, P; Provenzani, A; Santeusanio, A; Vizzini, G, 2013
)
0.87
" Therefore, the CYP3A5 genotype of Chinese pediatric recipients (intestine) as well as donors (graft liver) was performed for the purpose of establishing an optimal dosage regimen in children."( CYP3A5 genotypes affect tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and infectious complications in Chinese pediatric liver transplant patients.
Chen, Y; Han, L; Li, Q; Streicher, K; Xi, Z; Xia, Q; Xia, Y; Xu, N; Xue, F; Zhang, J, 2014
)
0.71
" Groups A and C received standard maintenance dosing with tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and corticosteroids."( Randomized trial of three induction antibodies in kidney transplantation: long-term results.
Burke, GW; Chen, L; Ciancio, G; Flores, S; Gaynor, JJ; Guerra, G; Hanson, L; Kupin, W; Mattiazzi, A; Roth, D; Sageshima, J; Tueros, L; Vianna, R, 2014
)
0.65
" Ad hoc analysis suggested that the inferior results in group B were specifically a result of reduced dosing and greater withholding of TAC and MMF occurring in that group."( Randomized trial of three induction antibodies in kidney transplantation: long-term results.
Burke, GW; Chen, L; Ciancio, G; Flores, S; Gaynor, JJ; Guerra, G; Hanson, L; Kupin, W; Mattiazzi, A; Roth, D; Sageshima, J; Tueros, L; Vianna, R, 2014
)
0.4
" Fifty-seven patients completed LCP-Tacro dosing in the core study; 43 completed the extension phase."( Conversion from twice daily tacrolimus capsules to once daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-Tacro): phase 2 trial of stable liver transplant recipients.
Alloway, RR; Eckhoff, DE; Teperman, LW; Washburn, WK, 2014
)
0.7
"A prospective, stratified observational study based on therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA (6 total plasma concentrations over a 12-hour dosing interval, τ) in consecutive stable adult renal transplant recipients (n = 68)."( Effect of cyclosporine on steady-state pharmacokinetics of MPA in renal transplant recipients is not affected by the MPA formulation: analysis based on therapeutic drug monitoring data.
Božina, N; Granić, P; Lalić, Z; Lebo, A; Lovrić, M; Nađ-Škegro, S; Pasini, J; Trkulja, V, 2014
)
0.4
"Tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant drug, presents a narrow therapeutic window and a large pharmacokinetic variability with poor correlation between drug dosing regimen and blood concentration."( Determination of the most influential sources of variability in tacrolimus trough blood concentrations in adult liver transplant recipients: a bottom-up approach.
Blanchet, B; Conti, F; Durand, F; Duvoux, C; Gérard, C; Hulin, A; Stocco, J; Tod, M; Verstuyft, C, 2014
)
2.08
" Pemphigus activity scores, the time that new bulla formation stopped, the time corticosteroid was tapered, cumulative steroid dosage and medication side effects were analyzed."( Assessment of the adjuvant effect of tacrolimus in the management of pemphigus vulgaris: A randomized controlled trial.
Baghernejhad, M; Dastgheib, L; Sadati, MS, 2015
)
0.69
" The administration of tacrolimus (1 mg) was started as the dosage of oral glucocorticoids was tapered."( Paradoxical response to disseminated non-tuberculosis mycobacteriosis treatment in a patient receiving tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor: a case report.
Imamura, Y; Izumikawa, K; Kakeya, H; Kohno, S; Miyazaki, T; Nakamura, S; Takazono, T; Yanagihara, K, 2014
)
0.71
" After reaching steady state, regimen stabilized and dosage was adjusted in accordance with the level of Tac."( Gender-dependent predictable pharmacokinetic method for tacrolimus exposure monitoring in kidney transplant patients.
Catic-Djordjevic, A; Cvetkovic, T; Mikov, M; Mitic, B; Paunovic, G; Stefanovic, N; Velickovic-Radovanovic, R, 2015
)
0.66
" Drugs with extended release action have simplified medication dosing without affecting efficacy."( An observational study evaluating tacrolimus dose, exposure, and medication adherence after conversion from twice- to once-daily tacrolimus in liver and kidney transplant recipients.
Bäckman, L; Persson, CA, 2014
)
0.68
" The change in dosing frequency was identified as "better" for 55%."( An observational study evaluating tacrolimus dose, exposure, and medication adherence after conversion from twice- to once-daily tacrolimus in liver and kidney transplant recipients.
Bäckman, L; Persson, CA, 2014
)
0.68
" Safety and efficacy were maintained; reduced dosing frequency had no apparent influence on patient-reported medication adherence."( An observational study evaluating tacrolimus dose, exposure, and medication adherence after conversion from twice- to once-daily tacrolimus in liver and kidney transplant recipients.
Bäckman, L; Persson, CA, 2014
)
0.68
"The results support the use of pre-transplant CYP3A5 genotyping to improve initial dosing of Tac, and suggest that Tac dosing may be further individualized by additional POR and PPARA genotyping."( The influence of CYP3A, PPARA, and POR genetic variants on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Bremer, S; Christensen, H; Dahl, M; Lunde, I; Midtvedt, K; Mohebi, B, 2014
)
0.63
" Cyclosporine dosing was adjusted with intensive therapeutic drug monitoring of blood cyclosporine levels."( Once-daily oral administration of cyclosporine in a lung transplant patient with a history of renal toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors.
Chen, F; Date, H; Matsuda, Y; Miyata, H, 2014
)
0.4
" Daily CsA dosage, CsA baseline (C0 ) and 2 h (C2 ) concentrations were comparable (CsA dosage 169 mg/day vs."( Reduced residual gene expression of nuclear factor of activated T cells-regulated genes correlates with the risk of cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation.
Giese, T; Hinz, U; Sandig, C; Sommerer, C; Steinebrunner, N; Stremmel, W; Zahn, A, 2014
)
0.4
" The dosage of EC-MPS was the same (1440 mg/day) in the two groups."( Cyclosporine A and tacrolimus combined with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium influence the plasma mycophenolic acid concentration - a randomised controlled trial in Chinese live related donor kidney transplant recipients.
Chen, JH; Chen, Y; Huang, HF; Shen-Tu, JZ; Xie, WQ; Yao, X, 2014
)
0.73
"Combined with the same EC-MPS dosage (1440 mg/day), the MPA-AUC0-12 of the Tac group was higher than that of the CsA group, and the Tac group had a longer MRT after kidney transplantation."( Cyclosporine A and tacrolimus combined with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium influence the plasma mycophenolic acid concentration - a randomised controlled trial in Chinese live related donor kidney transplant recipients.
Chen, JH; Chen, Y; Huang, HF; Shen-Tu, JZ; Xie, WQ; Yao, X, 2014
)
0.73
" The patient's tacrolimus trough levels rose rapidly over the course of 6 days from less than 2 ng/ml to 23 ng/ml, despite oral tacrolimus dosage adjustments."( Toxic tacrolimus levels after application of topical tacrolimus and use of occlusive dressings in two bone marrow transplant recipients with cutaneous graft-versus-host disease.
McCarthy, PL; Olson, KA; West, K, 2014
)
1.24
" Anemia and ribavirin dosage reduction were common."( Telaprevir in treatment of recurrent hepatitis C infection in liver transplant recipients.
Nair, S; Waters, B, 2014
)
0.4
"Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and subsequent dosage adjustment for individual patients in the treatment with tacrolimus are required after liver transplantation to prevent rejection and over-immunosuppression, which leads to severe infection and adverse reactions including nephrotoxicity."( Assessment of four methodologies (microparticle enzyme immunoassay, chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay, affinity column-mediated immunoassay, and flow injection assay-tandem mass spectrometry) for measuring tacrolimus blood concentration in Japanese live
Fujimoto, Y; Hashi, S; Kaido, T; Kikuchi, M; Masuda, S; Matsubara, K; Ogawa, K; Omura, T; Uemoto, S; Uesugi, M; Yano, I; Yonezawa, A, 2014
)
0.8
" Concordance analysis between the methods was performed covering dosage target ranges of 8-10, 6-8, 4-6 ng/mL currently used at our center."( Transplant patient classification and tacrolimus assays: more evidence of the need for assay standardization.
Agrawal, YP; Cid, M; Jaikaran, R; Levine, DM; Parker, TS; Westgard, S, 2014
)
0.67
" The method of administration and frequency of dosage of belatacept also lends itself well to the high-risk period of adolescence and transition."( Use of belatacept to maintain adequate early immunosuppression in calcineurin-mediated microangiopathic hemolysis post-renal transplant.
Baines, L; Brown, A; Reynolds, BC; Talbot, D, 2014
)
0.4
" Data were analyzed to evaluate changes in mycophenolic acid (MPA) dosing over time in 904 de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, n = 616) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, n = 288) with tacrolimus."( Long-term dosing patterns of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil with tacrolimus after renal transplantation.
Chan, L; Doria, C; Langone, A; McCague, K; Pankewycz, O; Shihab, F; Wiland, A, 2014
)
0.8
"Although the scarcity of clinical trials with de-novo immunosuppression has been typical over the last 2 years, several attempts have been made in drug conversion, dosing optimization, and bioequivalence."( Recent trials in immunosuppression and their consequences for current therapy.
Viklicky, O; Wohlfahrtova, M, 2014
)
0.4
" Limited published information exists regarding tacrolimus dosing when transitioning from voriconazole to itraconazole."( Tacrolimus dosage requirements in lung transplant recipients receiving antifungal prophylaxis with voriconazole followed by itraconazole: a preliminary prospective study.
Enderby, CY; Heckman, MG; Keller, CA; Thomas, CS, 2014
)
2.1
"Tacrolimus dosage adjustments were not necessary when converting from voriconazole to itraconazole."( Tacrolimus dosage requirements in lung transplant recipients receiving antifungal prophylaxis with voriconazole followed by itraconazole: a preliminary prospective study.
Enderby, CY; Heckman, MG; Keller, CA; Thomas, CS, 2014
)
3.29
" However, comparable data regarding clinical outcomes in HTx recipients receiving EVL either with dosage reduction of cyclosporine A (CSA) or with dosage reduction of tacrolimus (TAC) is scarce."( Clinical outcome in heart transplant recipients receiving everolimus in combination with dosage reduction of the calcineurin inhibitor cyclosporine A or tacrolimus.
Ensminger, SM; Fuchs, U; Gummert, JF; Schulz, U; Zittermann, A, 2014
)
0.8
" The immunosuppression dosing in conjunction with azole use at discharge was analyzed to develop a dosing algorithm dependent on whether fluconazole, posaconazole, or voriconazole was used."( Dosing algorithm for concomitant administration of sirolimus, tacrolimus, and an azole after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Fung, HC; Peksa, GD; Schultz, K, 2015
)
0.66
"Dose reductions of 50-75% for both sirolimus and tacrolimus, in combination with standard dosing of azole antifungal agents, were necessary to achieve therapeutic drug concentrations for immunosuppressants and potentially avoid toxicities."( Dosing algorithm for concomitant administration of sirolimus, tacrolimus, and an azole after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Fung, HC; Peksa, GD; Schultz, K, 2015
)
0.91
" Serum concentration of immunosuppressive drug was followed by its oral dosage and endomyocardial biopsy results."( Comparison of conventional tacrolimus versus prolong release formula as initial therapy in heart transplantation.
Baszyńska-Wachowiak, H; Jemielity, M; Ligowski, M; Misterski, M; Straburzyńska-Migaj, E; Urbanowicz, T, 2014
)
0.7
" This work advocates the avoidance of unnecessary high CNI dosing and puts forward new arguments for MPA concentration monitoring."( Exposure to mycophenolic acid better predicts immunosuppressive efficacy than exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplant patients.
Alain, S; Daher Abdi, Z; Essig, M; Garnier, F; Le Meur, Y; Marquet, P; Munteanu, E; Prémaud, A; Rousseau, A, 2014
)
0.4
" The developed optimal sampling strategies will allow the undertaking of prospective trials to define the tacrolimus AUC-based therapeutic window and dosing guidelines in this population."( Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimation of tacrolimus exposure in paediatric liver transplant recipients.
Alvarez, F; Beaunoyer, M; Delaloye, JR; Kassir, N; Labbé, L; Lallier, M; Lapeyraque, AL; Litalien, C; Mouksassi, MS; Théorêt, Y, 2014
)
0.86
"Although the once-daily formulation of tacrolimus (ADVAGRAF) is approved in renal transplantation to be used immediately after surgery, conventional twice-daily formulation offers better flexibility to adjust the dosage of tacrolimus during the initial period of transplantation."( Early conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily extended formulation in renal transplant patients before hospital discharge.
Alamartine, E; Jannot, M; Mariat, C; Masson, I, 2014
)
0.95
" The dosage of MMF was initially 2,000 mg/day, but was reduced to 500 mg/day due to diarrhea 10 days before the operation."( [Perioperative agranulocytosis induced by immunosuppressants in a renal graft recipient : a case report].
Inoue, T; Kamba, T; Kobayashi, T; Matsui, Y; Matsumoto, K; Murakami, K; Negoro, H; Ogawa, O; Okubo, K; Sugino, Y; Terada, N; Yamasaki, T; Yoshimura, K, 2014
)
0.4
" However, both single and multiple dosing treatments of SC alcoholic extract remarkably decreased the in vivo metabolism of tacrolimus indicated by the enhanced AUC (7-12 fold) and elevated Cmax (10 fold)."( Multifaceted interaction of the traditional Chinese medicinal herb Schisandra chinensis with cytochrome P450-mediated drug metabolism in rats.
Hu, J; Li, Y; Wang, B; Yang, S, 2014
)
0.61
" Clarithromycin (CLM) increases the blood trough level of Tac, effectively reducing the Tac dosage in human transplant patients."( Preliminary study of interaction of clarithromycin with tacrolimus in cats.
Katayama, M; Okamura, Y; Shimamura, S; Ushio, T; Uzuka, Y, 2014
)
0.65
"Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is commonly used as an induction therapy in renal transplant recipients, but the ideal dosage in tacrolimus-based early steroid withdrawal protocols has not been established."( Immunophenotyping and efficacy of low dose ATG in non-sensitized kidney recipients undergoing early steroid withdrawal: a randomized pilot study.
Azzi, J; Gilligan, H; Grafals, M; Hamill, K; Marangos, E; Murakami, N; Najafian, N; Pomfret, EA; Pomposelli, JJ; Riella, LV; Simpson, MA; Smith, B; Trabucco, A, 2014
)
0.61
" Only on day 3 and day 4 after transplant, a significant higher adjustment in the ADV dosage was necessary to achieve sufficient TAC trough levels."( De novo Prograf versus de novo Advagraf: are trough level profile curves similar?
Chmel, R; Fehervari, I; Gaal, I; Gaman, G; Langer, RM; Mathe, Z; Sarvary, E; Telkes, G; Varga, M; Wagner, L,
)
0.13
" Twenty four hours ERPF and GFR estimated by para-aminohippurate and sinistrin clearance were performed at baseline and at the end of each 10-day dosing period."( A randomized cross-over comparison of short-term exposure of once-daily extended release tacrolimus and twice-daily tacrolimus on renal function in healthy volunteers.
Cherney, DZ; Lai, V; Moon, KH; Schulz, MZ; Zaltzman, JS, 2014
)
0.62
" The developed model could be useful to optimize individual pediatric TAC dosing regimen in routine clinical practice."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus early after Chinese pediatric liver transplantation.
Li, WZ; Liao, SS; Qu, W; Rao, W; Sun, LY; Sun, XY; Yang, JW; Zhang, Y; Zhao, Y; Zhu, LQ, 2015
)
0.69
"The PPK model developed provides reliable prior information for Bayesian adaptive control of dosage regimens of tacrolimus to achieve the desired AUC goals in stable renal transplant patients."( Development of a population PK model of tacrolimus for adaptive dosage control in stable kidney transplant patients.
Andreu, F; Colom, H; Cruzado, JM; Grinyó, JM; Lloberas, N; Torras, J, 2015
)
0.9
"In the present study, we first detected the serum and renal ET-1 level of rats treated by tacrolimus and found strong positive correlations were existed between the ET-1 level and the tacrolimus dosage and treated time."( Ambrisentan improves the outcome of rats with liver transplantation partially through reducing nephrotoxicity.
Ding, GS; Fu, H; Fu, ZR; Gao, XG; Guo, WY; Han, QC; Ma, J; Ni, ZJ; Shi, XM; Song, SH; Wang, ZX; Zhang, L; Zou, Y, 2014
)
0.62
"This study investigated the relationship between serum TARC levels and the dosage of topical agents, including corticosteroids and/or tacrolimus, in patients with AD."( Reduction of serum TARC levels in atopic dermatitis by topical anti-inflammatory treatments.
Abe, T; Furue, M; Hagihara, A; Kido-Nakahara, M; Kohda, F; Nakahara, T; Takeuchi, S; Yasukochi, Y, 2014
)
0.61
" The weekly reduction in serum TARC levels and weekly dosage of topical agents among AD patients were compared and their associations were evaluated."( Reduction of serum TARC levels in atopic dermatitis by topical anti-inflammatory treatments.
Abe, T; Furue, M; Hagihara, A; Kido-Nakahara, M; Kohda, F; Nakahara, T; Takeuchi, S; Yasukochi, Y, 2014
)
0.4
"The dosage of topical agents was closely related to serum TARC levels."( Reduction of serum TARC levels in atopic dermatitis by topical anti-inflammatory treatments.
Abe, T; Furue, M; Hagihara, A; Kido-Nakahara, M; Kohda, F; Nakahara, T; Takeuchi, S; Yasukochi, Y, 2014
)
0.4
"Serum TARC level improvement and topical agent dosage are strongly correlated."( Reduction of serum TARC levels in atopic dermatitis by topical anti-inflammatory treatments.
Abe, T; Furue, M; Hagihara, A; Kido-Nakahara, M; Kohda, F; Nakahara, T; Takeuchi, S; Yasukochi, Y, 2014
)
0.4
" Dosage and trough concentration/dose ratios were considered separately."( Which Genetic Determinants Should be Considered for Tacrolimus Dose Optimization in Kidney Transplantation? A Combined Analysis of Genes Affecting the CYP3A Locus.
Borst, C; Bruckmueller, H; Caliebe, A; Cascorbi, I; Feldkamp, T; Kunzendorf, U; Renders, L; Tepel, M; Werk, AN, 2015
)
0.67
" These results strongly suggest that CYP3A5 genotyping both in recipient and donor, not ABCB1 or ACE is necessary for establishing a personalized TAC dosage regimen in pediatric liver transplant patients."( Personalized tacrolimus dose requirement by CYP3A5 but not ABCB1 or ACE genotyping in both recipient and donor after pediatric liver transplantation.
Chen, YK; Han, LZ; Lu, J; Shen, CH; Xia, Q; Xue, F; Yang, TH; Zhang, JJ, 2014
)
0.77
" Larger prospective studies need to address the clinical relevance of early combined genotype-based tacrolimus dosing in de-novo renal recipients."( Combined effects of CYP3A5*1, POR*28, and CYP3A4*22 single nucleotide polymorphisms on early concentration-controlled tacrolimus exposure in de-novo renal recipients.
Coopmans, T; de Jonge, H; de Loor, H; Kuypers, DR; Naesens, M, 2014
)
0.83
" Large interindividual variability and narrow therapeutic index make dosage individualisation mandatory in children."( Choosing the right dose of tacrolimus.
Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Lancia, P; Zhao, W, 2015
)
0.71
" The result from the present investigation indicates that STELLA® when coupled with biorelevant dissolution media can predict the in vivo performance of the drug product with prediction error less than 20% irrespective of the dosage form (immediate release versus modified release) and BCS Classification."( Prediction of in vivo drug performance using in vitro dissolution coupled with STELLA: a study with selected drug products.
Aggarwal, D; Chakraborty, S; Yadav, L, 2015
)
0.42
"Plasma concentration monitoring is commonly used to adjust immunosuppressant dosage in transplant recipients, but adjustment is often based on clinical experience rather than rigorous quantitative indicators."( Retrospective evaluation of the effect of mycophenolate mofetil dosage on survival of kidney grafts based on biopsy results.
Chen, JS; Cheng, DP; Cheng, DR; Ji, SM; Li, X; Liu, ZH; Ni, XF; Wen, JQ; Xie, KN, 2014
)
0.4
"We examined the effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dosage on graft survival by pathologic and immunologic analysis of 88 kidney recipients who were given a postoperative immunosuppressive regimen of tacrolimus (FK506), MMF, and corticosteroids."( Retrospective evaluation of the effect of mycophenolate mofetil dosage on survival of kidney grafts based on biopsy results.
Chen, JS; Cheng, DP; Cheng, DR; Ji, SM; Li, X; Liu, ZH; Ni, XF; Wen, JQ; Xie, KN, 2014
)
0.59
"These results indicate the importance of using an appropriate dosage of MMF in kidney transplant recipients."( Retrospective evaluation of the effect of mycophenolate mofetil dosage on survival of kidney grafts based on biopsy results.
Chen, JS; Cheng, DP; Cheng, DR; Ji, SM; Li, X; Liu, ZH; Ni, XF; Wen, JQ; Xie, KN, 2014
)
0.4
"Amended dosing with a simple bottom-up de novo algorithm is presented."( Delayed bottom-up and amended simple method of dosing with once-daily tacrolimus application to achieve stable trough levels in liver transplantation.
Ayik, C; Bechstein, WO; Mönch, C; Schnitzbauer, AA; Ulrich, F, 2015
)
0.65
" Standard steroid-free immunosuppression consisted of MMF 2 g/d, basiliximab 20 mg on day 0 and 4, and delayed bottom-up IS with TacOD starting with 1 mg/d and doubling the dosage every day until target trough levels of 5 to 8 ng/ml were reached."( Delayed bottom-up and amended simple method of dosing with once-daily tacrolimus application to achieve stable trough levels in liver transplantation.
Ayik, C; Bechstein, WO; Mönch, C; Schnitzbauer, AA; Ulrich, F, 2015
)
0.65
"This is the first report of bottom-up, amended, and simple dosing of TacOD in LT."( Delayed bottom-up and amended simple method of dosing with once-daily tacrolimus application to achieve stable trough levels in liver transplantation.
Ayik, C; Bechstein, WO; Mönch, C; Schnitzbauer, AA; Ulrich, F, 2015
)
0.65
" Alternative monitoring strategies, focusing on the pharmacodynamics of CNIs, could help to personalize drug dosing and optimize the treatment with CNIs."( Relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplant patients.
Albring, A; Engler, H; Harz, N; Kribben, A; Lindemann, M; Schedlowski, M; Wendt, L; Wilde, B; Witzke, O, 2015
)
0.42
" These findings illustrate that the HSD11B1 genotypes are closely correlated with tacrolimus trough concentrations, suggesting that these polymorphisms may be useful for safer dosing of tacrolimus."( Associations of HSD11B1 polymorphisms with tacrolimus concentrations in Chinese renal transplant recipients with prednisone combined therapy.
Fu, Q; Huang, M; Li, J; Liu, S; Liu, X; Wang, C; Wang, H; Wang, X; Zhang, Y; Zhu, C, 2015
)
0.91
"While CYP3A5 polymorphisms are used to predict the initial dosage of tacrolimus therapy, the predictive capability of genetic information for dosing at early stage post-renal transplantation is unknown."( Capability of utilizing CYP3A5 polymorphisms to predict therapeutic dosage of tacrolimus at early stage post-renal transplantation.
Habuchi, T; Inoue, T; Kagaya, H; Miura, M; Niioka, T; Numakura, K; Saito, M; Satoh, S, 2015
)
0.88
" Another study of patients with end-stage renal disease identified a similar sublingual:oral dosing ratio of 1:2."( Sublingual tacrolimus as an alternative to oral administration for solid organ transplant recipients.
Park, JM; Pennington, CA, 2015
)
0.81
" Dosing must be individualized, taking into consideration concomitant interacting medications, and adjusted to target levels based on therapeutic drug monitoring."( Sublingual tacrolimus as an alternative to oral administration for solid organ transplant recipients.
Park, JM; Pennington, CA, 2015
)
0.81
" Although no change in lymphedema was observed after 21 months despite dosage reduced, it improved markedly after changeover to tacrolimus."( [Sirolimus-induced lymphedema in a kidney-transplant recipient: Partial recovery after changeover to tacrolimus].
Al Gain, M; Azeroual, L; Bejar, C; Chen, L; Crickx, B; Descamps, V; Marinho, E, 2015
)
0.84
"DIAMOND: multicenter, 24-week, randomized trial investigating the effect of different once-daily, prolonged-release tacrolimus dosing regimens on renal function after de novo liver transplantation."( Renal Function in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving Different Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus Regimens-The DIAMOND Study.
Bechstein, WO; Brown, M; Friman, S; Isoniemi, H; Klempnauer, J; Mönch, C; Pirenne, J; Rostaing, L; Settmacher, U; Tisone, G; TruneČka, P; Undre, N; Zhao, A, 2015
)
0.85
" The results suggest that cyclosporine and tacrolimus doses and dosing frequency should be reduced in HCV-infected posttransplant patients being treated with this 3-DAA regimen."( Pharmacokinetics and dose recommendations for cyclosporine and tacrolimus when coadministered with ABT-450, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir.
Awni, W; Badri, P; Bernstein, B; Coakley, E; Cohen, D; Ding, B; Dutta, S; Menon, R; Podsadecki, T, 2015
)
0.92
" The dosage and time of therapy need to be explored in the future; additional studies of large samples are needed."( BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy with Plasma Cell-Rich Infiltrates Treated by Bortezomib-Based Regimen.
Chen, JS; Cheng, DR; Ji, SM; Li, X; Liu, ZH; Wen, JQ; Wu, D; Xie, KN; Zhang, MC, 2015
)
0.42
" We summarize evidence from the published literature supporting this association and provide dosing recommendations for tacrolimus based on CYP3A5 genotype when known (updates at www."( Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines for CYP3A5 Genotype and Tacrolimus Dosing.
Barbarino, JM; Birdwell, KA; Caudle, KE; Decker, B; He, Y; Klein, TE; Leeder, JS; MacPhee, IA; Peterson, JF; Sadee, W; Stein, CM; Swen, JJ; Thummel, KE; van Schaik, R; Vinks, AA; Wang, D, 2015
)
0.84
"The primary objective was to analyze the initial tacrolimus concentrations achieved in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients using the institutional dosing strategy of 1 mg IV daily initiated on day +5."( Factors associated with optimized tacrolimus dosing in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Bolaños-Meade, J; Brown, VT; Bryk, AW; Butts, AR; McBride, LD, 2016
)
0.97
"Tacrolimus dosing to establish therapeutic levels in recipients of organ transplants is a challenging task because of much interpatient and intrapatient variability in drug absorption, metabolism, and disposition."( Gut microbiota and tacrolimus dosing in kidney transplantation.
Dadhania, D; Jenq, RR; Lee, JR; Ling, L; Muthukumar, T; Pamer, E; Suthanthiran, M; Taur, Y; Toussaint, NC, 2015
)
2.19
" Blood concentrations of tacrolimus and its major metabolite 13-O-demethylate at 12h after dosing were determined."( ABCB1 genetic variant and its associated tacrolimus pharmacokinetics affect renal function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Aoki, Y; Hirano, K; Kagawa, Y; Kawakami, J; Mino, Y; Naito, T; Ogawa, N; Shimoyama, K, 2015
)
0.99
" It allowed the design of a proposed dosage based on the final model that is expected to help to improve tacrolimus dosing."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in Mexican paediatric renal transplant patients: role of CYP3A5 genotype and formulation.
Castañeda-Hernández, G; García-Roca, P; Jacobo-Cabral, CO; Medeiros, M; Reyes, H; Romero-Tejeda, EM; Trocóniz, IF, 2015
)
0.9
" Following the termination of nicardipine, all children eventually required dosage increases in their tacrolimus regimens to re-achieve target serum concentrations."( Supra-therapeutic tacrolimus concentrations associated with concomitant nicardipine in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
Carpenter, TC; Clark, N; Hurst, AL; Reiter, PD; Sundaram, SS, 2015
)
0.97
" This review provides an overview of all the currently available dosing algorithms in adult and children for the starting dose of ciclosporin, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid."( Dosing algorithms for initiation of immunosuppressive drugs in solid organ transplant recipients.
Andrews, LM; Cransberg, K; de Wildt, SN; de Winter, BC; Hesselink, DA; Riva, N; van Gelder, T, 2015
)
0.62
" Finally, a clinical trial demonstrating a benefit on clinical outcome will be crucial in achieving broad acceptance of calculating starting dose using individualized dosing algorithms."( Dosing algorithms for initiation of immunosuppressive drugs in solid organ transplant recipients.
Andrews, LM; Cransberg, K; de Wildt, SN; de Winter, BC; Hesselink, DA; Riva, N; van Gelder, T, 2015
)
0.42
" The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the target concentration achievement of tacrolimus using computerized dosing compared with conventional dosing performed by experienced transplant physicians."( Improved Tacrolimus Target Concentration Achievement Using Computerized Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients--A Prospective, Randomized Study.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Bremer, S; Midtvedt, K; Neely, M; Skauby, M; Størset, E, 2015
)
1.05
" Renal transplant recipients were randomized to receive either computerized or conventional tacrolimus dosing during the first 8 weeks after transplantation."( Improved Tacrolimus Target Concentration Achievement Using Computerized Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients--A Prospective, Randomized Study.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Bremer, S; Midtvedt, K; Neely, M; Skauby, M; Størset, E, 2015
)
1.05
"Eighty renal transplant recipients were randomized, and 78 were included in the analysis (computerized dosing (n = 39): 32 standard risk/7 high-risk, conventional dosing (n = 39): 35 standard risk/4 high-risk)."( Improved Tacrolimus Target Concentration Achievement Using Computerized Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients--A Prospective, Randomized Study.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Bremer, S; Midtvedt, K; Neely, M; Skauby, M; Størset, E, 2015
)
0.83
" The computer software is applicable as a clinical dosing tool to optimize tacrolimus exposure and may potentially improve long-term outcome."( Improved Tacrolimus Target Concentration Achievement Using Computerized Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients--A Prospective, Randomized Study.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Bremer, S; Midtvedt, K; Neely, M; Skauby, M; Størset, E, 2015
)
1.06
" The doses were adjusted according to clinical judgement to achieve target levels, and a second 24-h PK period profile was obtained once the patient was on a stable dosage on the therapeutic range."( Dose increase needed in most cystic fibrosis lung transplantation patients when changing from twice- to once-daily tacrolimus oral administration.
Avendaño-Sola, C; Cos, MA; Herrera, CP; Laporta, R; Lázaro, MT; Ruiz-Antorán, B; Salcedo, I; Sancho, A; Soto, GAC; Torres, F; Usetti, P, 2015
)
0.63
"We evaluated the clinical efficacy of tailoring tacrolimus dosage to cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 genotype in liver transplant patients."( Benefits of minimizing immunosuppressive dosage according to cytochrome P450 3A5 genotype in liver transplant patients: findings from a single-center study.
Li, N; Lu, SC; Wang, L; Wang, MX, 2015
)
0.67
" Achievement of therapeutic tacrolimus trough concentrations, potentially through genotyping and more aggressive dosing and monitoring, is essential to minimize the risk of acute rejection in AA kidney transplant recipients."( African-American race modifies the influence of tacrolimus concentrations on acute rejection and toxicity in kidney transplant recipients.
Baliga, PK; Chavin, KD; Egede, LE; Gebregziabher, MG; Srinivas, TR; Taber, DJ, 2015
)
0.97
" Patients may require a daily dosage increase if converted from Prograf(®) to Advagraf(®), while a daily dosage reduction appears necessary for conversion from Prograf(®) to Envarsus(®) XR."( Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Solid-Organ Transplant Patients.
Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2015
)
0.68
" The sensor was suitable to generate a dose-response curve in the full range of clinical drug monitoring."( Label-free quantification of Tacrolimus in biological samples by atomic force microscopy.
Biagiotti, S; Magnani, M; Menotta, M; Rossi, L; Streppa, L, 2015
)
0.71
" Current immunosuppression protocols include a combination of calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus, and antiproliferative agents (most commonly mycophenolate mofetil), with or without different dosing regimens of corticosteroids."( Current State of Immunosuppression: Past, Present, and Future.
Karam, S; Wali, RK, 2015
)
0.64
" Therefore, the optimal dosage strategies for mTOR-I and CNI need to be further explored."( mTOR inhibitor versus mycophenolic acid as the primary immunosuppression regime combined with calcineurin inhibitor for kidney transplant recipients: a meta-analysis.
Chen, J; Jiang, Y; Lai, X; Shou, Z; Xiang, S; Xie, X, 2015
)
0.42
"CYP3A5 and ABCB1-1236 genotyping, in addition to recipient age, are necessary for establishing a more accurate TAC dosage regimen in paediatric liver recipients."( Influence of CYP3A5 genotypes on tacrolimus dose requirement: age and its pharmacological interaction with ABCB1 genetics in the Chinese paediatric liver transplantation.
Chen, YK; Han, LZ; Luo, Y; Shen, CH; Xia, Q; Xue, F; Yang, TH; Zhang, JJ; Zhou, T, 2015
)
0.7
"During the first year after transplantation, the generic group had a greater drug variability (20% ± change in trough levels) that required more dosage adjustments (5."( Generics: are all immunosuppression agents created equally?
Buell, JF; Dortonne, I; Hauch, A; John, M; Kandil, E; Killackey, M; Lee, B; Paramesh, A; Patel, U; Smith, A; Zhang, R, 2015
)
0.42
" Genotyping of CYP3A4/MDR1/NR1I2 polymorphisms may be helpful for better guiding tacrolimus dosing in CYP3A5 nonexpressers."( Interactive effects of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, MDR1 and NR1I2 polymorphisms on tracrolimus trough concentrations in early postrenal transplant recipients.
Fu, Q; Huang, M; Li, JL; Liu, LS; Liu, S; Liu, XM; Wang, CX; Wang, XD; Zhang, Y, 2015
)
0.64
"Although rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) is commonly used as induction therapy for kidney transplantation, dosing is not standardized."( Evaluation of a Weight-based Rabbit Anti-thymocyte Globulin Induction Dosing Regimen for Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Lee, E; Lee, S; Park, JM; Pennington, CA; Sindelar, J; Tischer, SM, 2015
)
0.42
" To reduce risks, a knowledge-based system was developed that determines the right dosage of the immunosuppresive agent Tacrolimus."( Knowledge-based immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplant patients--from theoretical model to clinical integration.
de Bruin, JS; Plischke, M; Schuh, C; Seeling, W, 2015
)
0.63
"3 mg/kg/day schedule and with first C(min) assessment 48 hours after the conversion; and later conversion (>6 months posttransplantation) using a milligram-to-milligram dosage schedule, and with dose adjustment based on weekly C(min) measurement."( Once-daily prolonged release tacrolimus in liver transplantation: Experts' literature review and recommendations.
Calmus, Y; Chermak, F; Coilly, A; Dumortier, J; Duvoux, C; Guillaud, O; Houssel-Debry, P; Neau-Cransac, M; Stocco, J, 2015
)
0.71
" This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the time of conversion from Tac-BD to Tac-QD after renal transplant and the dosing requirements, tacrolimus levels, renal function, and clinical outcomes."( Early or Late Conversion From Tac-BD to Tac-BD in Renal Transplantation: When is the Right Time?
Falconer, SJ; Oniscu, GC; Peagam, WR,
)
0.33
" The average dosage of GCs was reduced from 33."( The efficacy of tacrolimus in patients with refractory dermatomyositis/polymyositis: a systematic review.
Ge, Y; Lu, X; Peng, Q; Shi, J; Wang, G; Ye, B; Zhou, H, 2015
)
0.76
" Thus, although CNIs remain the major immunosuppressive treatment, their dosage should be minimized by using them with either full-dose MPA or reduced-dose EVR."( The safety of calcineurin inhibitors for kidney-transplant patients.
Malvezzi, P; Rostaing, L, 2015
)
0.42
" Five patients had a reduction in tacrolimus dosage to an undetectable trough level, another five to a trough level <4ng/ml, including one patient who was off the study."( Minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
Chen, CY; Chin, T; Lin, NC; Liu, C; Liu, CP; Loong, CC; Tsai, HL; Wang, HK; Yeh, YC, 2015
)
0.7
" Using our prospectively followed cohort of 528 adult, primary kidney transplant recipients (pooled across four randomized trials) who received reduced TAC dosing plus an IMPDH inhibitor, TAC trough levels measured at seven time points, 7, 14 days, 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9 months post-transplant, were utilized along with Cox's model to determine the multivariable significance of TAC level(t) (a continuous time-dependent covariate equaling the most recently measured TAC level prior to time t) on the hazard rate of developing first BPAR during the first 12 months post-transplant."( Lower tacrolimus trough levels are associated with subsequently higher acute rejection risk during the first 12 months after kidney transplantation.
Burke, GW; Chen, L; Ciancio, G; Flores, S; Gaynor, JJ; Goldstein, MJ; Guerra, G; Hanson, L; Kupin, W; Mattiazzi, A; Roth, D; Ruiz, P; Sageshima, J; Tueros, L; Vianna, R, 2016
)
0.92
" Tacrolimus dosage was 2 mg/day (median)."( Long-term follow-up of patients with difficult to treat type 1 autoimmune hepatitis on Tacrolimus therapy.
Adams, DH; Füssel, K; Hirschfield, GM; Hodson, J; Lohse, AW; Mann, J; Oo, YH; Schramm, C; Than, NN; Weiler-Normann, C; Wiegard, C, 2016
)
1.57
"Between April 20, 2004 and 4-14-2009 we conducted a prospective, randomized, non-blinded renal transplantation trial of two rATG dosing protocols (single dose, 6 mg/kg vs."( A Randomized 2x2 Factorial Clinical Trial of Renal Transplantation: Steroid-Free Maintenance Immunosuppression with Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal after Six Months Associates with Improved Renal Function and Reduced Chronic Histopathology.
Florescu, DF; Foster, KW; Kalil, AC; Malik, T; Miles, CD; Rigley, TH; Sandoz, JP; Stevens, RB; Wrenshall, LE, 2015
)
0.42
" We reviewed tacrolimus levels and dosing in a pediatric patient aged 8 months who had undergone deceased-donor liver transplantation for biliary atresia and later required sedation with dexmedetomidine continuous infusion during the POD (212-216)."( Tacrolimus interaction with dexmedetomidine--a case report.
Bucuvalas, JC; Hemmelgarn, TS; Squires, JE; Stiehl, SR, 2016
)
2.25
" There were no differences in dosage changes or kidney or liver function."( Transition from brand to generic tacrolimus is associated with a decrease in trough blood concentration in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
Duong, SQ; Feingold, B; Joshi, R; Lal, AK; Venkataramanan, R, 2015
)
0.7
" Multiple daily dosing is associated with an increased risk for nonadherence."( Extended release once a day tacrolimus.
Singh, N; Von Visger, J; Zachariah, M, 2015
)
0.71
" In the Tac group, higher Day 1 dosage (P <0."( Is there a genetic predisposition to new-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation?
Abraham, G; Ali, AA; Mathew, M; Mehra, N; Nagarajan, P; Ramachandran, A; Reddy, PP; Reddy, YN; Sundaram, V, 2015
)
0.42
" Not only does tacrolimus have potent immunosuppressive qualities that prevent rejection, but dosing is straight forward and it is generally well tolerated."( Tacrolimus for the prevention and treatment of rejection of solid organ transplants.
Ally, W; Brayman, KL; Levi, ST; Scalea, JR, 2016
)
2.23
" These data suggest that a novel SLS/HPMC SD may be an advantageous dosage form of FK506, boosting the dissolution and absorption in gastrointestinal tract."( Improved oral absorption of tacrolimus by a solid dispersion with hypromellose and sodium lauryl sulfate.
Ahn, HI; Cho, HR; Choi, YS; Ho, MJ; Jung, HJ; Kang, MJ; Lee, DR; Park, JS; Park, JY, 2016
)
0.73
" This study is the first to develop an AA-specific genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing model to personalize therapy."( Genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing in African-American kidney transplant recipients.
Brundage, RC; Guan, W; Israni, AK; Jacobson, PA; Mannon, RB; Matas, AJ; Miller, MB; Oetting, WS; Remmel, RP; Sanghavi, K; Schladt, DP, 2017
)
1.04
" In order to maintain the balance between efficacy and safety, dosing is based on measured drug concentrations."( Population Pharmacokinetic Approach of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Kidney Transplant Patients.
Golubovic, B; Grabnar, I; Miljkovic, B; Prostran, M; Radivojevic, D; Vucicevic, K, 2016
)
0.43
" The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between MDR1 gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and their haplotypes with dosage of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients who were cytochrome (CYP) 3A5*3 homozygotes."( The importance of MDR1 gene polymorphisms for tacrolimus dosage.
Brkovic, V; Kravljaca, M; Lausevic, M; Milinkovic, M; Naumovic, R; Perovic, V; Pravica, V, 2016
)
0.89
" After a 2-month course of treatment with hydroxychloroquine dosage of 200 mg per day and a break of 3 months between courses, we observed a complete remission."( Unilateral unique Lupus tumidus: pathogenetic mystery and diagnostic problem.
Bakardzhiev, I; Chokoeva, AA; Krasnaliev, I; Lotti, T; Tana, C; Tchernev, G; Wollina, U, 2016
)
0.43
" However, the conversion strategies of dosage and concentration from twice- to once-daily are not well studied."( Safe One-to-One Dosage Conversion From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Long-Term Stable Recipients After Liver Transplantation.
Chen, CL; Li, WF; Lin, CC; Lin, TL; Lin, YH; Wang, CC; Wang, SH; Wu, YJ; Yong, CC, 2016
)
0.67
"One-to-one dosage conversion in stable LDLT recipients is a safe strategy."( Safe One-to-One Dosage Conversion From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Long-Term Stable Recipients After Liver Transplantation.
Chen, CL; Li, WF; Lin, CC; Lin, TL; Lin, YH; Wang, CC; Wang, SH; Wu, YJ; Yong, CC, 2016
)
0.67
" The dosing recommendations for pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) recipients have been derived from tacrolimus use in adult solid-organ transplantation patients."( Risk Factors for Subtherapeutic Tacrolimus Levels after Conversion from Continuous Intravenous Infusion to Oral in Children after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Bhatia, M; Garvin, JH; George, D; Jin, Z; Kahn, J; Kolb, M; Kung, AL; Offer, K; Satwani, P, 2016
)
0.92
" Base on desired target range of tacrolimus trough concentrations, individual daily dosage regimen was calculated, and all the observed daily doses were within the predicted range."( Prediction of tacrolimus metabolism and dosage requirements based on CYP3A4 phenotype and CYP3A5(*)3 genotype in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Cai, NF; Cheng, ZN; Luo, X; Zheng, LY; Zhu, LJ, 2016
)
1.08
"This study provides the equations to predict tacrolimus metabolism and dosage requirements based on the endogenous CYP3A4 phenotype, CYP3A5(*)3 genotype and other non-genetic variables."( Prediction of tacrolimus metabolism and dosage requirements based on CYP3A4 phenotype and CYP3A5(*)3 genotype in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Cai, NF; Cheng, ZN; Luo, X; Zheng, LY; Zhu, LJ, 2016
)
1.05
" The mean area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours on day 14 was higher than previously reported; this difference may reflect cautious dosing regimens."( A Pilot Study of the Pharmacokinetics of the Modified-Release Once-Daily Tacrolimus Formulation Administered to Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipients.
Hwang, S; Kim, KH; Kim, WJ; Lee, SG; Sin, MH; Song, GW; Tak, EY; Yoon, YI, 2016
)
0.67
" In the present study, we have evaluated the long-term clinical impact of the adaptation of initial tacrolimus dosing according to CYP3A5 genotype: The transplantation outcomes of the 236 kidney transplant recipients included in the Tactique study were retrospectively investigated over a period of more than 5 years."( Long-Term Clinical Impact of Adaptation of Initial Tacrolimus Dosing to CYP3A5 Genotype.
Bailly, E; Beaune, P; Buchler, M; Choukroun, G; Colosio, C; Etienne, I; Heng, AE; Hurault de Ligny, B; Le Meur, Y; Legendre, C; Loriot, MA; Moulin, B; Pallet, N; Thervet, E; Thierry, A; Vigneau, C, 2016
)
0.9
" After 3 weeks, the changes of tacrolimus dosage and hepatorenal function in the two groups were compared."( Effects of Wuzhi capsule on blood concentration of tacrolimus after renal transplantation.
Jiang, X; Miao, SZ; Qu, QS; Wang, K; Zhang, YX,
)
0.67
" Inter- and intraindividual variability in dosing requirements conventionally use physician-guided titrated drug administration, which results in frequent deviations from the target trough ranges, particularly during the critical postoperative phase."( Individualizing liver transplant immunosuppression using a phenotypic personalized medicine platform.
Agopian, V; Busuttil, R; Datta, N; Eriksen, C; Farmer, D; Ho, CM; Ho, D; Kaldas, F; Kee, T; Lee, DK; Silva, A; Wang, SE; Weigle, K; Zarrinpar, A, 2016
)
0.43
" An FK506 dosage curve was acquired to determine the minimum in vitro concentration for optimal axonal outgrowth of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells, then PLGA devices were designed and tested in a diffusion chamber, and finally the bioactivity of the released media was evaluated by measuring axon growth in DRG cells exposed to the media for 72 h."( Controlled Delivery of FK506 to Improve Nerve Regeneration.
Agarwal, J; Gale, BK; Ho, S; Labroo, P; Sant, H; Shea, J, 2016
)
0.43
" In fact, it was demonstrated that a single daily dose (QD) is associated with an increased adherence to therapy compared with twice daily dosing (BID)."( Meltdose Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics.
Baraldo, M, 2016
)
0.85
" Everolimus was reinitiated in both cases in addition to decreasing the dosage of tacrolimus, and there were no further complications."( Use of Everolimus After Multivisceral Transplantation: A Report of Two Cases.
Jafri, SM; Kazimi, M; Parekh, R; Rao, B; Raoufi, M; Segovia, MC, 2016
)
0.66
"BACKGROUND Dosing of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) should be adjusted to reflect concomitant immunosuppression, but it is largely undocumented whether such modifications are carried out during routine clinical practice."( Dosing of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium Under Routine Conditions: An Observational, Multicenter Study in Kidney Transplantation.
Albano, L; Buchler, M; Cantarovich, D; Cassuto, E; Cointault, O; Kamar, N; Lecuyer, A; Mazouz, H; Tindel, M; Vetromile, F, 2016
)
0.43
"The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in paediatric patients at least 1 year after renal transplantation and simulate individualised dosage regimens."( The Effect of Weight and CYP3A5 Genotype on the Population Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Stable Paediatric Renal Transplant Recipients.
Bouts, AH; Cransberg, K; de Jong, H; de Wildt, SN; Mathôt, RA; Prytuła, AA; van Schaik, RH, 2016
)
0.89
" The final model was externally validated on an independent dataset and dosing regimens were simulated."( The Effect of Weight and CYP3A5 Genotype on the Population Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Stable Paediatric Renal Transplant Recipients.
Bouts, AH; Cransberg, K; de Jong, H; de Wildt, SN; Mathôt, RA; Prytuła, AA; van Schaik, RH, 2016
)
0.66
"This review summarises the available data on the population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and use of Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) Bayesian estimation to predict tacrolimus exposure and subsequent drug dosage requirements in solid organ transplant recipients."( Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling and Bayesian Estimation of Tacrolimus Exposure: Is this Clinically Useful for Dosage Prediction Yet?
Brooks, E; Isbel, NM; Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2016
)
0.9
" Sensitivity analysis showed the analysis to be most sensitive to dosing assumptions."( A cost-utility analysis of prolonged-release tacrolimus relative to immediate-release tacrolimus and ciclosporin in liver transplant recipients in the UK.
Muduma, G; Odeyemi, I; Pollock, RF, 2016
)
0.69
" Clinically feasible models that combine important factors may help guide individual tacrolimus dosage adjustment in kidney transplant patients."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Thai kidney transplant patients: comparison with similar data from other populations.
Avihingsanon, Y; Praisuwan, S; Techawathanawanna, N; Treyaprasert, W; Vadcharavivad, S, 2016
)
0.94
" The decrement for daily dosage of Tac-QD was significantly greater in patients expressing the CYP3A5*3/*3 than the CYP3A5*1 allele."( Effects of CYP3A5 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of a once-daily modified-release tacrolimus formulation and acute kidney injury in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Abumiya, M; Fujishima, M; Fujishima, N; Hirokawa, M; Kameoka, Y; Miura, M; Nara, M; Niioka, T; Shinohara, Y; Tagawa, H; Takahashi, N; Ubukawa, K; Yamashita, T, 2016
)
0.66
"Everolimus (EVR) has been used widely for the purpose of reducing the dosage of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), leading to decreasing CNI nephrotoxicity."( Effectiveness of the Combination of Everolimus and Tacrolimus With High Dosage of Mizoribine for Living Donor-Related Kidney Transplantation.
Harada, S; Ito, T; Koshino, K; Nakamura, T; Nakao, T; Nobori, S; Suzuki, T; Ushigome, H; Yoshimura, N, 2016
)
0.69
" Anticipated increases in plasma concentrations of tacrolimus and cyclosporin A occurred during telaprevir treatment and were successfully managed through immunosuppressant dose reduction and, for tacrolimus, reduced dosing frequency."( Efficacy of telaprevir-based therapy in stable liver transplant patients with chronic genotype 1 hepatitis C.
Agarwal, K; Berenguer, M; Colombo, M; Daems, B; Didier, S; Fagiuoli, S; Forns, X; Herzer, K; Janssen, K; Kimko, H; Lathouwers, E; Mutimer, D; Navasa, M; Nevens, F; Ouwerkerk-Mahadevan, S; Van Solingen-Ristea, R; Witek, J,
)
0.38
" TCR was administered by oral route at the scheduled dosage while the 50% of oral dosage was used by SL route, taking into account the absence of liver first pass."( Sublingual administration improves systemic exposure of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: comparison with oral administration.
Apicella, L; Balletta, MM; Capone, D; Carrano, R; Federico, S; Mosca, T; Nappi, R; Russo, L; Sabbatini, M; Santangelo, M; Tarantino, G, 2016
)
0.68
" The success of these dosing recommendations was evaluated by analyzing pharmacokinetic data from liver transplant recipients in the CORAL-I study."( Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine in Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving 3 Direct-Acting Antivirals as Treatment for Hepatitis C Infection.
Awni, WM; Badri, PS; Coakley, EP; Ding, B; Dutta, S; Menon, RM; Parikh, A, 2016
)
0.76
"A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using tacrolimus dosing and Ctrough data before and during 3D treatment (n = 29)."( Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine in Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving 3 Direct-Acting Antivirals as Treatment for Hepatitis C Infection.
Awni, WM; Badri, PS; Coakley, EP; Ding, B; Dutta, S; Menon, RM; Parikh, A, 2016
)
1.01
"Observed data for tacrolimus and CSA in liver transplant recipients confirm that the recommended dosing strategies are valid and therapeutic levels of immunosuppression can be maintained during 3D treatment."( Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine in Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving 3 Direct-Acting Antivirals as Treatment for Hepatitis C Infection.
Awni, WM; Badri, PS; Coakley, EP; Ding, B; Dutta, S; Menon, RM; Parikh, A, 2016
)
1.09
" The diagnosis revised as new onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation and the tacrolimus dosage titrated to therapeutic level."( A rare but important adverse effect of tacrolimus in a heart transplant recipient: diabetic ketoacidosis.
Akcan, L; Bayrakçı, B; Ertuğrul, İ; Gönç, EN; Kesici, S; Öztürk, Z,
)
0.63
"5, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h after dosing by LC-MS/MS assay."( Limited Sampling Strategy for the Estimation of Tacrolimus Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve in Chinese Adult Liver Transplant Patients.
Chen, B; Chen, H; Liu, XX; Song, YY; Xu, BM; Yang, WH, 2016
)
0.69
" The combination of FK506 with NGF, GDNF, or both, exerted a potentiating or competitive effect on neurite elongation (∼700-1100 µm) based on dosage and competitive effect on neurite branching (∼0."( Effect Of combining FK506 and neurotrophins on neurite branching and elongation.
Agarwal, J; Gale, B; Labroo, P; Sant, H; Shea, J, 2017
)
0.46
" To enable sensitive monitoring the dose-response characteristics of the consecutive neurobehavioral disorders, mice received gradient concentrations of hydroquinone (2%, 4%, 6%)."( Developmental Neurotoxic Effects of Percutaneous Drug Delivery: Behavior and Neurochemical Studies in C57BL/6 Mice.
Cai, M; Feng, J; Fu, M; He, Q; Huang, Q; Lv, W; Shang, J; Wu, H, 2016
)
0.43
" Despite the decrease in serum tacrolimus of > 30% after conversion, none of the patients who were converted to a dosage ratio (once-daily tacrolimus dosage: twice-daily tacrolimus dosage) > 1 had an LFT abnormality."( Risk Factors for the Adverse Events after Conversion from Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Stable Liver Transplantation Patients.
Jeong, J; Kim, H; Lee, KW; Suh, KS; Suh, SW; Yi, NJ, 2016
)
0.94
" The new prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus was developed to provide a more convenient once-daily dosing to improve patient adherence."( Conversion From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Stable Kidney Graft Recipients.
Almeida, M; Barreto, P; Cabrita, A; Dias, L; Henriques, AC; Malheiro, J; Martins, LS; Pedroso, S; Vieira, P, 2016
)
0.96
" In patients whose blood concentration decreases after the switch, the development of GVHD should be monitored and tacrolimus dosage should be readjusted to maintain an appropriate blood concentration."( Analysis of the variable factors influencing tacrolimus blood concentration during the switch from continuous intravenous infusion to oral administration after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Akashi, K; Ikesue, H; Masuda, S; Matsukawa, K; Miyamoto, T; Shiratsuchi, M; Suetsugu, K; Tsuchiya, Y; Uchida, M; Watanabe, H; Yamamoto-Taguchi, N, 2017
)
0.92
" Metabolic analysis was performed to determine more accurate tacrolimus dosing and patients were followed-up within clinic every 6 months for up to 4 years."( Long-term efficacy and side effects of low-dose tacrolimus for the treatment of Myasthenia Gravis.
Chen, Y; Huang, X; Jing, F; Tao, X; Wang, W; Wang, Z; Wei, D, 2017
)
0.95
"Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (MPS) is now commonly used in pediatric intestinal transplantation (Tx), but to date, no clear recommendations regarding the dosing regimen have been made in this population."( Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid and Dose Optimization in Children After Intestinal Transplantation.
Barau, C; Chhun, S; Furlan, V; Lacaille, F; Mellos, A, 2017
)
0.46
" The median MMF dosage had to be increased by 91% (1319 mg·m·d versus 687 mg·m·d) to reach AUC0-12 values above the defined target level of 30 mg·h·L."( Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid and Dose Optimization in Children After Intestinal Transplantation.
Barau, C; Chhun, S; Furlan, V; Lacaille, F; Mellos, A, 2017
)
0.46
" Further studies are required to recommend a suitable dosage for pediatric intestinal transplant recipients who receive MPA."( Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid and Dose Optimization in Children After Intestinal Transplantation.
Barau, C; Chhun, S; Furlan, V; Lacaille, F; Mellos, A, 2017
)
0.46
" The area under the curves (AUC) of immunosuppressants was calculated by the plot of plasma trough level or dosage of each immunosuppressant versus time and was interpreted as the extent of drug exposure."( Effect of Immunosuppressive Drugs on the Changes of Serum Galactose-Deficient IgA1 in Patients with IgA Nephropathy.
Barratt, J; Kim, MJ; Koller, MT; Molyneux, K; Schaub, S; Stampf, S, 2016
)
0.43
" However, its absorption is delayed due to its special designed dosage form, which results in difficulty to monitor the exposure of the MPA in patients receiving the EC-MPS."( Estimation of Mycophenolic Acid Area Under the Curve With Limited-Sampling Strategy in Chinese Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium.
Jia, Y; Li, L; Peng, B; Qi, G; Qiu, J; Rong, R; Wang, J; Wang, L; Wang, X; Xu, M; Zhu, T, 2017
)
0.46
" We suggest a critical reappraisal of current paediatric dosing algorithms for tacrolimus and drugs with a similar disposition."( Tacrolimus dose requirements in paediatric renal allograft recipients are characterized by a biphasic course determined by age and bone maturation.
Debbaut, E; Fieuws, S; Herman, J; Knops, N; Kuypers, D; Levtchenko, E; Ramazani, Y; van Damme-Lombaerts, R; van den Heuvel, LP; van Dyck, M, 2017
)
2.13
" Therefore, adjusting initial TAC dosing to the genotype of CYP3A5 might be of clinical benefit."( Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism of CYP3A5 Impacts the Exposure to Tacrolimus in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients: A Pharmacogenetic Substudy of the TWIST Trial.
Billing, H; Dello Strologo, L; Fichtner, A; Friman, S; Höcker, B; Jaray, J; Oellerich, M; Sarvary, E; Tönshoff, B; van Damme-Lombaerts, R; von Ahsen, N; Vondrak, K, 2017
)
0.69
" At baseline, average daily proportions of patients with correct dosing (82."( Efficacy of a medication adherence enhancing intervention in transplantation: The MAESTRO-Tx trial.
Berben, L; De Bleser, L; De Geest, S; Dobbels, F; Dupont, L; Kristanto, P; Nevens, F; Vanhaecke, J; Verleden, G, 2017
)
0.46
" These changes were clinically relevant because the tacrolimus dosage needed to be adjusted."( Decreased tacrolimus plasma concentrations during HCV therapy: a drug-drug interaction or is there an alternative explanation?
Burger, DM; de Kanter, CT; Drenth, JP; Pape, S; Smolders, EJ; van den Berg, AP, 2017
)
1.11
" These results indicate that the TNF-α-308G>A polymorphism may influence the dosage of immunosuppressive drugs in patients after transplantation as far as individualization of drug therapy is concerned."( The influence of the tumor necrosis factor-alpa-308G>A polymorphism on the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy in patients after kidney transplantation.
Bartkowiak-Wieczorek, J; Bogacz, A; Czerny, B; Dziewanowski, K; Grzeskowiak, E; M Kotowski, M; Machalinski, B; Ostrowski, M; Procyk, D; Sienko, J, 2016
)
0.43
"Immunosuppressive medication dosing errors are not unfrequent and may present a number of challenges to transplant clinicians."( Red blood cell exchange as an approach for treating a case of severe tacrolimus overexposure.
Bianco, I; Biancofiore, G; Bindi, L; DeSimone, P; Mazzoni, A; Precisi, A; Spallanzani, V, 2017
)
0.69
"Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors were neither protective nor permissive for de novo donor-specific antibody formation versus mycophenolate when used with clinically relevant tacrolimus dosing regimens."( De Novo Donor-Specific Antibody Formation in Tacrolimus-Based, Mycophenolate Versus Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Immunosuppressive Regimens.
Adebiyi, O; Cooper, JE; Gralla, J; Klem, P; Mithani, Z; Wiseman, AC, 2018
)
0.93
" The aim of our study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in adult kidney transplant of Chinese patients, identify factors especially CYP3A5*3 genetic polymorphism that explain variability, and determine dosage regimens."( Tacrolimus population pharmacokinetics according to CYP3A5 genotype and clinical factors in Chinese adult kidney transplant recipients.
Fang, Y; Li, DY; Liu, TS; Zhang, HJ; Zhu, HJ, 2017
)
2.13
" However, since tacrolimus concentrations in the blood can rise easily in elderly patients, frequent monitoring of the drug concentrations and dosage adjustments are necessary."( Rapid Induction Therapy with Oral Tacrolimus in Elderly Patients with Refractory Ulcerative Colitis Can Easily Lead to Elevated Tacrolimus Concentrations in Blood: A Report of 5 Cases.
Kawamura, H; Mashima, H; Matsumoto, S; Miyatani, H; Nakamura, N, 2017
)
1.08
" To reduce the dosage burden of the antagonist, murine oral PK was improved an order of magnitude relative to previous FK506 antagonists."( A calcineurin antifungal strategy with analogs of FK506.
Covel, JA; Kapoor, M; Li, X; Moloney, MK; Mutz, M; Nambu, M; Numa, MM; Soltow, QA; Trzoss, M; Webb, P; Webb, RR, 2017
)
0.46
" A complete remission (CR) of signs occurred between days 35 and 70 after starting CIs in eight dogs (73%); increasing ciclosporin dosage and adding topical tacrolimus induced a CR in two additional dogs (18%)."( Therapeutic effectiveness of calcineurin inhibitors in canine vesicular cutaneous lupus erythematosus.
Banovic, F; Linek, M; Olivry, T; Robson, D, 2017
)
0.65
" Delays in dosing time will result in transient periods of lower concentrations in high versus low clearance patients."( High Tacrolimus Clearance Is a Risk Factor for Acute Rejection in the Early Phase After Renal Transplantation.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Egeland, EJ; Gustavsen, MT; Hartmann, A; Hermann, M; Holdaas, H; Klaasen, R; Midtvedt, K; Reisæter, AV; Robertsen, I; Størset, E, 2017
)
0.97
" After reduced dosing of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, 2 limbal tumors occurred in the recipient."( Transmission of Donor-Derived Breast Carcinoma as a Recurrent Mass in a Keratolimbal Allograft.
Chamberlain, W; Dunlap, J; Miller, AK; Wilson, DJ; Young, JW, 2017
)
0.76
" We retrospectively analyzed the dosage and blood concentrations of immunosuppressants during the 3-month period prior to the renal biopsy between the two patient groups."( Tacrolimus Blood Level Fluctuation Predisposes to Coexisting BK Virus Nephropathy and Acute Allograft Rejection.
Lien, TJ; Shen, CL; Tarng, DC; Yang, AH; Yang, CY, 2017
)
1.9
" The identified covariates were of biological plausibility and clinical importance to help individualize the dosing schedule in MG patients."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in Chinese myasthenia gravis patients.
Chen, R; Chen, YS; Huang, L; Liu, ZQ; Lu, W; Ma, P; Wang, L; Zhou, TY; Zhu, X, 2017
)
0.72
"To assess the prevalence of CYP3A5 genomic variances and their impact on tacrolimus (TAC) dosing requirements among kidney transplant recipients in eastern North Carolina, we conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study at a large tertiary care medical center."( Prevalence of CYP3A5 Genomic Variances and Their Impact on Tacrolimus Dosing Requirements among Kidney Transplant Recipients in Eastern North Carolina.
Asempa, T; Hudson, S; Maldonado, AQ; Rebellato, LM, 2017
)
0.93
"5 h after Tac dosing at approximately 1 week, 6 weeks and 1 year post-Tx."( NFAT-regulated cytokine gene expression during tacrolimus therapy early after renal transplantation.
Bergan, S; Bremer, S; Johansson, ED; Kasbo, M; Midtvedt, K; Skauby, M; Vethe, NT, 2017
)
0.71
"The cytokine response after Tac dosing varied up to 46-fold between patients and changed significantly with time post-engraftment."( NFAT-regulated cytokine gene expression during tacrolimus therapy early after renal transplantation.
Bergan, S; Bremer, S; Johansson, ED; Kasbo, M; Midtvedt, K; Skauby, M; Vethe, NT, 2017
)
0.71
" Dosing of these drugs is individualized by therapeutic drug monitoring."( Dried Blood Spot Sampling for Tacrolimus and Mycophenolic Acid in Children: Analytical and Clinical Validation.
Aarnoutse, RE; Brüggemann, RJM; Burger, DM; Cornelissen, EA; Croes, S; Hoogtanders, KEJ; Joore, MA; Martial, LC; Schreuder, MF; van der Heijden, J; Van Maarseveen, EM, 2017
)
0.74
" They showed that the mean prednisolone dosage significantly decreased (6."( A multicenter prospective observational study on the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in patients with myasthenia gravis.
Ahn, SW; Cho, EB; Hong, YH; Joo, IS; Kang, SY; Kim, BJ; Min, JH; Minn, YK; Nam, TS; Oh, J; Oh, SY; Park, JS; Park, YE; Seok, HY; Seok, JI; Seok, JM; Shin, HY; Shin, JY; Suh, BC; Sung, JJ, 2017
)
0.68
" The oral steroid dosage decreased from baseline to 24 months."( Post-marketing surveillance study of the long-term use of mizoribine for the treatment of lupus nephritis: 2-Year results.
Okada, K; Takeuchi, T; Yagi, N; Yoshida, H, 2018
)
0.48
" Because muscle pain disappeared, the CAM dosage was halved."( Successful treatment with clarithromycin and/or tacrolimus for two patients with polymyalgia rheumatica.
Horita, T; Ohe, M; Oku, K; Shida, H,
)
0.39
" In the current study, we investigated the influence of gene polymorphisms and other clinical factors on long-term tacrolimus dosing in Chinese renal transplant recipients."( Long-Term Influence of CYP3A5, CYP3A4, ABCB1, and NR1I2 Polymorphisms on Tacrolimus Concentration in Chinese Renal Transplant Recipients.
Liu, F; Ou, YM; Xin, HW; Xiong, L; Yu, AR, 2017
)
0.9
" Immunosuppression used cyclosporine (88) or tacrolimus (68) as a calcineurin inhibitor, and the dosage was adjusted based on blood concentrations."( High-dose mizoribine combined with calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), basiliximab and corticosteroids for renal transplantation: A Japanese multicenter study.
Akioka, K; Kawakita, M; Nakamura, N; Nakatani, T; Nishimura, K; Nishioka, T; Ushigome, H; Watarai, Y; Yoshimura, N; Yuzawa, K, 2018
)
0.97
" The dosage of prednisone, the severity of symptoms, blood samples, the serum concentration of tacrolimus, and titers of antiacetylcholine receptor antibodies were evaluated every four weeks."( Tacrolimus Improves Symptoms of Children With Myasthenia Gravis Refractory to Prednisone.
Bu, B; Cao, Y; Gui, M; Ji, S; Li, Y; Lin, J; Liu, C, 2017
)
2.12
" At the end point, the dosage of prednisone was significantly decreased (P < 0."( Tacrolimus Improves Symptoms of Children With Myasthenia Gravis Refractory to Prednisone.
Bu, B; Cao, Y; Gui, M; Ji, S; Li, Y; Lin, J; Liu, C, 2017
)
1.9
" Tac administration requires frequent and diligent monitoring by physicians to ensure proper dosage and to limit the potential for harmful adverse effects, which can include renal damage, neurotoxicity, and other serious adverse events."( Tacrolimus: A Review of Laboratory Detection Methods and Indications for Use.
Kalt, DA, 2017
)
1.9
" These data, based on a cohort with modest size, suggest either that tumorigenesis in LTx recipients is unrelated to tacrolimus exposure or that levels in these patients are above an unknown threshold at which the dose-response effect is saturated."( Tacrolimus Levels Are Not Associated with Risk of Malignancy in Lung Transplant Recipients.
Ashquar, F; Fox, BD; Izhakian, S; Kramer, MR; Raviv, Y; Rozengarten, D; Straichman, O, 2017
)
2.11
" Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), delayed graft function (DGF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), infections, and tacrolimus dosing requirements were examined in 106 immunologically high-risk AA kidney transplant patients over a 2-year follow-up period."( Impact of CYP3A5 genomic variances on clinical outcomes among African American kidney transplant recipients.
Asempa, TE; Briley, K; Hudson, S; Maldonado, AQ; Rebellato, LM, 2018
)
0.69
"Differences in tacrolimus dosing across ancestries is partly attributable to polymorphisms in CYP3A5 genes that encode tacrolimus-metabolizing cytochrome P450 3A5 enzymes."( Results of ASERTAA, a Randomized Prospective Crossover Pharmacogenetic Study of Immediate-Release Versus Extended-Release Tacrolimus in African American Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Bloom, RD; Brennan, DC; Lim, MA; Milone, MC; Neubauer, R; Nigro, V; Trofe-Clark, J; West-Thielke, P, 2018
)
1.04
" More stringent dosing of tacrolimus early after transplantation may be critical in preserving the kidney function."( Association of Whole Blood Tacrolimus Concentrations with Kidney Injury in Heart Transplantation Patients.
de Lange, DW; Hunault, CC; Kesecioglu, J; Kirkels, JH; Sikma, MA; Verhaar, MC, 2018
)
1.08
" Its pharmacokinetics is characterized by a high interpatient and intrapatient variability (IPV) leading to an unpredictable dose-response relationship."( High Intrapatient Variability of Tacrolimus Exposure in the Early Period After Liver Transplantation Is Associated With Poorer Outcomes.
Beaurepaire, JM; Bellissant, E; Boudjema, K; Camus, C; Dehlawi, A; Desfourneaux, V; Houssel-Debry, P; Jézéquel, C; Lakéhal, M; Lemaitre, F; Meunier, B; Petitcollin, A; Rayar, M; Sulpice, L; Tron, C; Verdier, MC, 2018
)
0.76
" The dosage of steroids was significantly decreased at six months compared with baseline and was maintained at 12 months."( Outcomes of multitarget therapy using mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus for refractory or relapsing lupus nephritis.
Bae, SC; Choi, CB; Won, S, 2018
)
0.72
" These POPPK models can also be used to perform Monte Carlo simulations that help to establish different dosing rules or to anticipate the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in particular populations, without conducting clinical trials."( Pharmacokinetic models to assist the prescriber in choosing the best tacrolimus dose.
Åsberg, A; Debord, J; Saint-Marcoux, F; Woillard, JB, 2018
)
0.91
" Accurate dosage prediction using a multiple linear regression-based LSS was not possible without concentrations up to at least 8 hours after the dose."( Evaluation of Multiple Linear Regression-Based Limited Sampling Strategies for Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Brooks, EK; Isbel, NM; McWhinney, B; Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2018
)
0.48
" However, as the cost of sequencing continues to fall, it is feasible to span all clinically actionable genotypes and provide patients with relevant information throughout their lifetime, which would, therefore, optimize tacrolimus dosing by facilitating the structured dosing algorithms (for example, population pharmacokinetic models) and clinical decision support."( Current progress of tacrolimus dosing in solid organ transplant recipients: Pharmacogenetic considerations.
Li, J; Lin, G; Tan, L; Zhang, X, 2018
)
0.99
" We postulate that there is room for improvement of dosing, as the optimal immunosuppressive dose in calcineurin-free regimens is unknown and since the once daily dosing regimen for oncological indications is often associated with treatment-limiting toxicity."( A pharmacological rationale for improved everolimus dosing in oncology and transplant patients.
Burger, DM; de Fijter, JW; Guchelaar, HJ; Moes, DJAR; Reinders, MEJ; Ter Heine, R; van Erp, NP; van Herpen, CM, 2018
)
0.48
"We developed a mechanistic population pharmacokinetic model for everolimus in cancer and transplant patients and explored alternative dosing regimens."( A pharmacological rationale for improved everolimus dosing in oncology and transplant patients.
Burger, DM; de Fijter, JW; Guchelaar, HJ; Moes, DJAR; Reinders, MEJ; Ter Heine, R; van Erp, NP; van Herpen, CM, 2018
)
0.48
" Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring is essential for tacrolimus to optimize dosage and prevent adverse reactions."( Dose optimization of tacrolimus with therapeutic drug monitoring and CYP3A5 polymorphism in patients with myasthenia gravis.
Chen, D; Hou, S; Sun, X; Yang, L; Zhang, H; Zhao, M, 2018
)
1.05
" Therapeutic drug monitoring and detection of CYP3A5 gene polymorphism was essential for dosage optimization in patients with MG."( Dose optimization of tacrolimus with therapeutic drug monitoring and CYP3A5 polymorphism in patients with myasthenia gravis.
Chen, D; Hou, S; Sun, X; Yang, L; Zhang, H; Zhao, M, 2018
)
0.8
" This study was intended to evaluate the population pharmacokinetics (PPK) of TAC in paediatric NS and to optimize dosing regimen."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children with nephrotic syndrome.
Hao, GX; Huang, X; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Li, Y; Shi, HY; Zhang, DF; Zhao, W; Zheng, Y, 2018
)
0.77
"The PPK of TAC was estimated in children with NS and a CYP3A5 genotype-based dosing regimen was set up based on simulations."( Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children with nephrotic syndrome.
Hao, GX; Huang, X; Jacqz-Aigrain, E; Li, Y; Shi, HY; Zhang, DF; Zhao, W; Zheng, Y, 2018
)
0.77
" They were separated into two groups (positive or negative PCR) and evaluated for dosage serum levels of cyclosporine and tacrolimus."( Cyclosporine Versus Tacrolimus: Which Calcineurin Inhibitor Has Influence on Cytomegalovirus Infection in Cardiac Transplantation?
Bond, MMK; Dias, VH; Dos Santos, CC; Finger, MA; Neto, JMR; Said, TL; Santos, AMG; Sehn, A, 2018
)
1.01
" On 23 August, Tac level was found undetectable; hence, dosage was increased."( Ribavirin-induced anaemia reduced tacrolimus level in a hepatitis C patient receiving haemodialysis.
Cheung, CYS; Cooper, SE; Liu, HY, 2018
)
0.76
"Genetic polymorphism is an important factor that influences tacrolimus concentrations and has the potential to predict the optimal dosage of tacrolimus in personalized medicine."( CYP3A5*3 Genetic Polymorphism and Tacrolimus Concentration in Myanmar Renal Transplant Patients.
Htun, YY; Saw, TM; Swe, HK, 2018
)
1
" An established guideline provides tacrolimus genotype dosing recommendations based on CYP3A5*1(W/T) and loss of protein function variants: CYP3A5*3 (rs776746), CYP3A5*6 (rs10264272), CYP3A5*7 (rs41303343) and may provide more comprehensive race-adjusted dosing recommendations."( Tacrolimus Population Pharmacokinetics and Multiple CYP3A5 Genotypes in Black and White Renal Transplant Recipients.
Brazeau, D; Campagne, O; Mager, DE; Tornatore, KM; Venuto, RC, 2018
)
2.2
"BACKGROUND Minimizing the tacrolimus dosage in patients with stable allograft function needs further investigation."( Reduced Tacrolimus Trough Level Is Reflected by Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Changes in Stable Renal Transplantation Recipients: Results of the OPTIMUM Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Study.
Huh, W; Kim, JK; Kim, YH; Kim, YL; Kim, YS; Lee, J; Oh, CK; Park, S; Park, SK; Yang, CW, 2018
)
1.22
"Although therapeutic drug monitoring of plasma mycophenolic acid (MPA) concentrations has been recommended to individualize dosage in transplant recipients, little is known regarding lymphocyte concentrations of MPA, where MPA inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH)."( Mycophenolic acid concentrations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells are associated with the incidence of rejection in renal transplant recipients.
Carroll, RP; Coller, JK; McWhinney, BC; Md Dom, ZI; Sallustio, BC; Somogyi, AA; Tuke, J, 2018
)
0.48
" total bodyweight) affects trough plasma concentrations of tacrolimus when a standard mg/kg dosing regimen is used; and (ii) to investigate whether obese patients have different numbers of plasma concentrations outside the therapeutic range compared to non-obese patients in the first months after liver transplant."( Weight-based tacrolimus trough concentrations post liver transplant.
Cheng, J; Fawcett, J; Liu, Z; Lynch, S; Macdonald, G; Martin, J; Powell, E, 2019
)
1.13
"In the first week post-transplant, tacrolimus trough concentrations after standard mg/kg dosing post liver transplant appear to be corrected by total bodyweight."( Weight-based tacrolimus trough concentrations post liver transplant.
Cheng, J; Fawcett, J; Liu, Z; Lynch, S; Macdonald, G; Martin, J; Powell, E, 2019
)
1.16
"15 mg/kg/d) initial Tac dosing regimen in older (>55 years) and/or overweight KTRs."( No Significant Influence of Reduced Initial Tacrolimus Dose on Risk of Underdosing and Early Graft Function in Older and Overweight Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Chudek, J; Giza, P; Kolonko, A; Krzyżowska, K; Więcek, A,
)
0.39
" Of note, induction therapy was employed twice more often in the reduced Tac dosing group."( No Significant Influence of Reduced Initial Tacrolimus Dose on Risk of Underdosing and Early Graft Function in Older and Overweight Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Chudek, J; Giza, P; Kolonko, A; Krzyżowska, K; Więcek, A,
)
0.39
"The currently recommended reduction in Tac initial dosing does not increase the risk of inadequate immunosuppression and does not affect the early graft function."( No Significant Influence of Reduced Initial Tacrolimus Dose on Risk of Underdosing and Early Graft Function in Older and Overweight Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Chudek, J; Giza, P; Kolonko, A; Krzyżowska, K; Więcek, A,
)
0.39
" Dosing is adjusted using whole blood (WB-TAC) measurements."( Longitudinal Study of Tacrolimus in Lymphocytes During the First Year After Kidney Transplantation.
Andersen, AM; Bergan, S; Bremer, S; Daleq, L; Klaasen, RA; Midtvedt, K; Skauby, MH; Vethe, NT, 2018
)
0.8
"05) except before dosage at 6 weeks."( Longitudinal Study of Tacrolimus in Lymphocytes During the First Year After Kidney Transplantation.
Andersen, AM; Bergan, S; Bremer, S; Daleq, L; Klaasen, RA; Midtvedt, K; Skauby, MH; Vethe, NT, 2018
)
0.8
" However, the magnitude of the impact of clotrimazole on tacrolimus dosing requirements to maintain goal levels is not well described."( Effects of clotrimazole troches on tacrolimus dosing in heart transplant recipients.
Boilson, B; Crow, SA; Dierkhising, R; Laub, MR; Personett, HA; Razonable, R, 2018
)
1
" The guideline has recommended that the tacrolimus dosage should be adjusted according to the CYP3A5 genotype."( Individualized Tacrolimus Therapy for Pediatric Nephrotic Syndrome: Considerations for Ontogeny and Pharmacogenetics of CYP3A.
Chen, F; Ding, XS; Guo, HL; Sun, F; Sun, JY; Xu, J; Xu, ZJ, 2018
)
1.1
"Tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid dosing after renal transplantation is individualized through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)."( Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in outpatient renal transplant recipients using a volumetric dried blood spot sampling device.
de Fijter, JW; Gokoel, SRM; Guchelaar, HJ; Kweekel, DM; Moes, DJAR; Swen, JJ; van der Boog, PJM; Zwart, TC, 2018
)
2.21
" TDM dosing recommendations based on both methods were compared to assess clinical impact."( Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in outpatient renal transplant recipients using a volumetric dried blood spot sampling device.
de Fijter, JW; Gokoel, SRM; Guchelaar, HJ; Kweekel, DM; Moes, DJAR; Swen, JJ; van der Boog, PJM; Zwart, TC, 2018
)
0.77
" Tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid dosing recommendation differences occurred on 44."( Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in outpatient renal transplant recipients using a volumetric dried blood spot sampling device.
de Fijter, JW; Gokoel, SRM; Guchelaar, HJ; Kweekel, DM; Moes, DJAR; Swen, JJ; van der Boog, PJM; Zwart, TC, 2018
)
1.68
" However, the benefit of genotype-guided dosing in pediatric solid organ transplantation has been understudied."( A randomized clinical trial of age and genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing after pediatric solid organ transplantation.
Grasemann, H; Kamath, BM; Lafreniere-Roula, M; Manlhiot, C; Min, S; Mital, S; Nalli, N; Ng, V; Papaz, T; Parekh, RS; Schwartz, SM, 2018
)
0.73
"CYP3A5 genotype-guided dosing stratified by age resulted in earlier attainment of therapeutic tacrolimus concentrations and fewer out-of-range concentrations."( A randomized clinical trial of age and genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing after pediatric solid organ transplantation.
Grasemann, H; Kamath, BM; Lafreniere-Roula, M; Manlhiot, C; Min, S; Mital, S; Nalli, N; Ng, V; Papaz, T; Parekh, RS; Schwartz, SM, 2018
)
0.95
" Our results suggest that tacrolimus is potentially effective for treating LN and that the current dosage was generally well tolerated for long-term maintenance treatment in our patients with LN."( Long-term effects of tacrolimus for maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis: a 5-year retrospective study at a single center.
Karasawa, K; Kodama, M; Moriyama, T; Nitta, K; Uchida, K, 2018
)
1.1
" The PFIC2 patient had abnormal liver function 19 months after LT, and recovered after administration of increased dosage of immunosuppressant agents."( Liver Transplantation for Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis.
Liu, Y; Qu, W; Sun, LY; Wei, L; Zeng, ZG; Zhu, ZJ, 2018
)
0.48
"The aim of this study was to perform a population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in Mexican adult kidney transplant patients to analyse the influence of clinical and genetic covariates to propose a dosage regimen."( Dosing recommendations based on population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Mexican adult patients with kidney transplant.
Isordia-Segovia, J; Medellín-Garibay, SE; Milán-Segovia, RDC; Niño-Moreno, PDC; Reséndiz-Galván, JE; Romano-Moreno, S, 2019
)
0.98
" The observed adverse events justify a modification of dosing and timing of ATLG infusion."( Tacrolimus and Single Intraoperative High-dose of Anti-T-lymphocyte Globulins Versus Tacrolimus Monotherapy in Adult Liver Transplantation: One-year Results of an Investigator-driven Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ackenine, K; Bonaccorsi Riani, E; Ciccarelli, O; Coubeau, L; De Reyck, C; Foguenne, M; Gianello, P; Iesari, S; Komuta, M; Lai, Q; Lerut, J, 2018
)
1.92
" The CYP3A5 genotype, as a covariate, consistently impacted tacrolimus clearance, and dosing adjustments were required to achieve similar drug exposure among patients."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Transplant Recipients: What Did We Learn About Sources of Interindividual Variabilities?
Campagne, O; Mager, DE; Tornatore, KM, 2019
)
1.04
" Intensified and standard dosage regimens of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) were week 1, 2,160 vs."( Short-Term Intensified Dosage Regimen of Mycophenolic Acid is Associated with Less Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplantation from Donation after Circulatory Death.
Chen, J; Huang, H; Liu, G; Peng, W; Wu, J, 2018
)
0.48
" In treating the patients with NTM, we were able to maintain an adequate blood concentration of CNI by decreasing the dosage from one-half to one-quarter."( Management of De Novo Mycobacterial Infection After Lung Transplantation Without Rifampicin: Case Series of a Single Institution.
Matsuda, Y; Noda, M; Oishi, H; Okada, Y; Sado, T; Suzuki, H; Tamada, T; Watanabe, T; Yamada, M, 2018
)
0.48
"Background Dosage quantities of tacrolimus (TAC) vary according to cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) genotype."( Effect of CYP3A5 genotype on hospitalization cost for kidney transplantation.
Anutrakulchai, S; Chan-On, C; Limwattananon, C; Vannaprasaht, S, 2019
)
0.8
" We aimed to investigate whether CYP3A5, CYP3A4, and ABCB1 genotyping could contribute to a more precise and individualized initial dosing of Tac at the time of immunosuppressant conversion."( Switching Immunosuppression From Cyclosporine to Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients Based on CYP3A5 Genotyping.
Gao, L; Liu, Z; Wang, X; Wang, Z; Xiao, C; Yang, Y; Zhang, W, 2019
)
0.77
"Our preliminary study supports the use of CYP3A5 genotyping to guide the initial dosing of Tac when converting the immunosuppression therapy from CsA to Tac."( Switching Immunosuppression From Cyclosporine to Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients Based on CYP3A5 Genotyping.
Gao, L; Liu, Z; Wang, X; Wang, Z; Xiao, C; Yang, Y; Zhang, W, 2019
)
0.77
" Immunomodulators such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine may be used as steroid-sparing agents; however, the dosing and duration of use still need to be clearly defined."( Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis.
Maharana, PK; Raj, N; Sahay, P; Sharma, N; Singhal, D; Titiyal, JS,
)
0.43
" After dosing was discontinued, TAC-treated mice showed gradual graft rejection, whereas EVL-treated mice sustained long-term robust chimerism."( Evaluation of the impact of conventional immunosuppressant on the establishment of murine transplantation tolerance - an experimental study.
Fukuda, H; Hirai, T; Ikemiyagi, M; Ishii, R; Ishii, Y; Kanzawa, T; Katsumata, H; Miyairi, S; Okumi, M; Omoto, K; Saiga, K; Tanabe, K; Yokoo, T, 2019
)
0.51
" Although transplant vintage did not appreciably impact mycophenolate dosing in non-African Americans (0."( Change in Mycophenolate and Tacrolimus Exposure by Transplant Vintage and Race.
Posadas Salas, AC; Soliman, KM; Taber, DJ, 2019
)
0.81
" Therefore, we carried out a study to determine the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus after intramuscular (IM) injection and to determine the optimal IM dosing regimens in primate models."( Reduced variability in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics following intramuscular injection compared to oral administration in cynomolgus monkeys: Investigating optimal dosing regimens.
Gershkovich, P; Kim, KS; Kim, SJ; Kim, TH; Lee, JB; Lee, KW; Park, JB; Shin, BS; Shin, S; Yoo, SD, 2019
)
1.06
" Study outcomes included conversion dosing ratios, PR-T dose and trough levels, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate between conversion and month 12, graft/patient survival, and rejection rate (Kaplan-Meier)."( Safety and Effectiveness of Conversion From Cyclosporine to Once-Daily Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in Stable Kidney Transplant Patients: A Multicenter Observational Study in Japan.
Aikawa, A; Sugamori, H; Tanaka, H; Uno, S; Usuki, S, 2018
)
0.7
" Our singlecenter experience revealed that the availability of once-daily tacrolimus formulation could give potential benefit of improved medication compliance and better allograft outcomes by decreasing pill burden and thereby simplifying dosing schedule, Advagraf was non-inferior to twice-daily tacrolimus regarding safety and efficacy."( Comparative analysis for optimizing the modified release tacrolimus (Advagraf) after kidney transplantation: A prospective randomized trial.
Abbas, MH; Abdel-Rahman, AM; Abu-Elmagd, MM; Bakr, MA; Denewar, AA; Donia, AF; Elsaftawy, MM; Ghoneim, MA; Mashaly, ME; Nagib, AM,
)
0.61
"Various mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models have been developed to describe its PK characteristics and facilitate its optimal dosing in adult kidney transplant recipients co-administered with tacrolimus."( Systematic external evaluation of published population pharmacokinetic models of mycophenolate mofetil in adult kidney transplant recipients co-administered with tacrolimus.
Deng, RH; Fu, Q; Jiao, Z; Li, J; Liu, LS; Liu, YF; Luo, B; Sheng, CC; Wang, CX; Zhang, HX; Zhao, Q, 2019
)
0.89
" The period required to attain target trough concentration and the clinical efficacy before and after dosage modification was compared."( Rapid attainment of target trough concentrations of tacrolimus for early improvement of clinical symptoms in patients with ulcerative colitis.
Araki, H; Hayashi, H; Ibuka, T; Kato-Hayashi, H; Niwa, T; Ohno, Y; Shimizu, M; Sugiyama, T; Suzuki, A; Yamada, Y, 2019
)
0.76
"The initial dose after dosage modification was significantly increased compared to that before dosage modification (0."( Rapid attainment of target trough concentrations of tacrolimus for early improvement of clinical symptoms in patients with ulcerative colitis.
Araki, H; Hayashi, H; Ibuka, T; Kato-Hayashi, H; Niwa, T; Ohno, Y; Shimizu, M; Sugiyama, T; Suzuki, A; Yamada, Y, 2019
)
0.76
" The clinical efficacy during an average follow-up of 21 months (range, 14-24 months) was assessed by evaluating the changes of serum creatine kinase (CK) levels, the Medical Research Council (MRC) grading of the weakest muscle groups and dosage of oral prednisone."( Tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids effectively improved the outcome of a cohort of patients with immune-mediated necrotising myopathy.
Bu, B; Feng, F; Ji, S; Li, Y; Wang, Q,
)
1.57
" In addition, the daily dosage of prednisone was statistically significantly reduced (p<0."( Tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids effectively improved the outcome of a cohort of patients with immune-mediated necrotising myopathy.
Bu, B; Feng, F; Ji, S; Li, Y; Wang, Q,
)
1.57
" Dosing regimens were between 1 and 8 mg/day."( A review of the utility of tacrolimus in the management of adults with autoimmune hepatitis.
Ascha, M; Ascha, MS; Chedid, A; Hanouneh, IA; Hanouneh, M; Ritchie, MM; Sanguankeo, A; Zein, NN, 2019
)
0.81
" External validation was conducted, and Monte Carlo simulation, based on the final model, was carried out to determine optimal dosage regimen."( Population pharmacokinetics and dosage optimization of tacrolimus in pediatric patients with nephrotic syndrome
.
Chen, C; Cui, Y; Ding, J; Han, Y; Ma, L; Su, B; Wang, F; Wang, X; Xiao, H; Yao, Y; Zhou, Y, 2019
)
0.76
" Monte Carlo simulation based on the final model was carried out to determine optimal dosage regimen."( Population pharmacokinetics and dosage optimization of tacrolimus in pediatric patients with nephrotic syndrome
.
Chen, C; Cui, Y; Ding, J; Han, Y; Ma, L; Su, B; Wang, F; Wang, X; Xiao, H; Yao, Y; Zhou, Y, 2019
)
0.76
" The final model could be used to accurately predict tacrolimus individual pharmacokinetic parameters and assist in dosage optimization."( Population pharmacokinetics and dosage optimization of tacrolimus in pediatric patients with nephrotic syndrome
.
Chen, C; Cui, Y; Ding, J; Han, Y; Ma, L; Su, B; Wang, F; Wang, X; Xiao, H; Yao, Y; Zhou, Y, 2019
)
1.01
"The objective of this study was to merge genetic and non-genetic factors of tacrolimus pharmacokinetics to establish a more stable population pharmacokinetic model for individualized dosage regimen in Chinese nephrotic syndrome patients."( Dosage Optimization Based on Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Tacrolimus in Chinese Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome.
Huang, X; Lu, T; Wang, Z; Xu, S; Zhao, L; Zhao, M; Zhu, X, 2019
)
0.98
" Monte Carlo simulations were performed to optimize the dosage according to the population pharmacokinetic parameters of tacrolimus."( Dosage Optimization Based on Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Tacrolimus in Chinese Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome.
Huang, X; Lu, T; Wang, Z; Xu, S; Zhao, L; Zhao, M; Zhu, X, 2019
)
0.96
"A new population pharmacokinetic model was established to describe the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in nephrotic syndrome patients, which can be used to select rational dosage regimens to achieve a desirable whole-blood concentration."( Dosage Optimization Based on Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Tacrolimus in Chinese Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome.
Huang, X; Lu, T; Wang, Z; Xu, S; Zhao, L; Zhao, M; Zhu, X, 2019
)
0.97
" The primary outcome was the tacrolimus therapeutic weight-based dosing requirements (mg/kg/day) for patients receiving amiodarone prior to transplant when compared to those without prior receipt of amiodarone."( Prior Amiodarone Exposure Reduces Tacrolimus Dosing Requirements in Heart Transplant Recipients.
Breslin, NT; Colombo, PC; Farr, M; Jennings, DL; Latif, F; Restaino, S; Salerno, DM; Takayama, H; Takeda, K; Topkara, VK, 2019
)
1.08
" Several tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients have been set up to recommend an optimal dosage schedule."( Population pharmacokinetics and dosing regimen optimization of tacrolimus in Chinese pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients.
Chen, X; Li, Z; Wang, D; Xu, H, 2020
)
1.21
" The dosing methods are available on our ImmunoSuppressive Bayesian dose Adjustment website (www."( Population pharmacokinetic model and Bayesian estimator for 2 tacrolimus formulations in adult liver transplant patients.
Debord, J; Marquet, P; Monchaud, C; Riff, C; Woillard, JB, 2019
)
0.75
" These data support the reduction in clinical dosage of letermovir (to 240 mg) upon coadministration with cyclosporine."( Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interactions Between Letermovir and the Immunosuppressants Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, and Mycophenolate Mofetil.
Adedoyin, A; Cho, CR; Iwamoto, M; Kraft, WK; Levine, V; Liu, F; Macha, S; Marshall, W; McCrea, JB; Menzel, K; Panebianco, D; Stoch, SA; Yoon, E; Zhao, T, 2019
)
0.73
" In clinical practice, an effective dosage adjustment of tacrolimus may need to be considered in patients with PBF ≥ 30% at 1 week after liver transplantation."( Impact of body composition on pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in liver transplantation recipients.
Chen, L; Li, M; Liu, Y; Lu, X; Tan, G; Zhu, L, 2020
)
1.06
"Sirolimus and tacrolimus require accurate drug dosing based on their target blood levels to produce better clinical outcomes, specifically, the avoidance of drug-induced adverse effects and the maintenance of efficacy."( Estimation of Blood Sirolimus Concentration Based on Tacrolimus Concentration/Dose Normalized by Body Weight Ratio in Lung Transplant Patients.
Akiba, M; Kikuchi, M; Mano, N; Matsuda, Y; Noda, M; Oishi, H; Okada, Y; Sado, T; Shigeta, K; Takasaki, S; Tanaka, M; Yamaguchi, H, 2019
)
1.12
" A significant correlation between the dosage of sirolimus and tacrolimus was observed only in the OD group, with relatively low accuracy."( Estimation of Blood Sirolimus Concentration Based on Tacrolimus Concentration/Dose Normalized by Body Weight Ratio in Lung Transplant Patients.
Akiba, M; Kikuchi, M; Mano, N; Matsuda, Y; Noda, M; Oishi, H; Okada, Y; Sado, T; Shigeta, K; Takasaki, S; Tanaka, M; Yamaguchi, H, 2019
)
1
"Blood sirolimus concentrations can be estimated using the C0/D ratio of tacrolimus, suggesting that the C0/D ratio of tacrolimus is an index of required sirolimus dosage and the frequency of blood sirolimus concentration measurements."( Estimation of Blood Sirolimus Concentration Based on Tacrolimus Concentration/Dose Normalized by Body Weight Ratio in Lung Transplant Patients.
Akiba, M; Kikuchi, M; Mano, N; Matsuda, Y; Noda, M; Oishi, H; Okada, Y; Sado, T; Shigeta, K; Takasaki, S; Tanaka, M; Yamaguchi, H, 2019
)
1
"Our novel findings suggest the potential need to reduce mycophenolic acid dosage in subjects on corticosteroid-free regimens."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid Co-Administered with Tacrolimus in Corticosteroid-Free Adult Kidney Transplant Patients.
Ensom, MHH; Kiang, TKL; Mayo, P; Rong, Y, 2019
)
0.75
" This retrospective observational study assessed the relationship between serum iPTH levels and the blood concentration or dosage of tacrolimus, a CYP3A substrate, after oral administration in kidney transplant patients."( Effect of Serum Parathyroid Hormone on Tacrolimus Therapy in Kidney Transplant Patients: A Possible Biomarker for a Tacrolimus Dosage Schedule.
Hirata, K; Ichimizu, S; Ikegami, K; Imafuku, T; Jingami, S; Maeda, H; Maruyama, T; Matsuzaka, K; Sugimoto, R; Toyoda, M; Uekihara, S; Watanabe, H, 2019
)
0.99
" However, this LLOQ may not be low enough now because the dosage of tacrolimus has decreased in recent years."( High-sensitivity simultaneous quantification of tacrolimus and 13-O-demethyl tacrolimus in human whole blood using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry.
Itoh, H; Kaneko, T; Mimata, H; Ono, H; Sato, F; Sato, Y; Suzuki, Y; Tanaka, R, 2019
)
1
" The primary endpoint was the difference in TAC-ER exposure (AUC0-24) in obese patients dosed using aBW compared with IBW."( A randomized, open-label pharmacokinetic trial of tacrolimus extended-release dosing in obese de novo kidney transplant recipients.
Benedetti, E; Brandt, S; Huang, YJ; Jasiak-Panek, NM; Patel, S; Progar, K; Thielke, JJ; Wenzler, E; West-Thielke, PM, 2019
)
0.77
" There was no difference in the number of days to therapeutic trough concentration between the two dosing weights (aBW = 5."( A randomized, open-label pharmacokinetic trial of tacrolimus extended-release dosing in obese de novo kidney transplant recipients.
Benedetti, E; Brandt, S; Huang, YJ; Jasiak-Panek, NM; Patel, S; Progar, K; Thielke, JJ; Wenzler, E; West-Thielke, PM, 2019
)
0.77
" Recipients carrying H2/H2 (GG-AA) haplotype in rs15524-rs4646453 may require a low dosage of TAC during 1-year follow-up posttransplant."( Association of Genetic Variants in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2C8, and CYP2C19 with Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Chen, H; Gu, M; Guo, M; Han, Z; Sun, L; Tan, R; Tao, J; Wang, L; Wang, Z; Wei, JF; Yang, H; Zheng, M, 2019
)
0.74
"An ultra-high performance liquid chromatography method for simultaneous determination of tacrolimus impurities in pharmaceutical dosage forms has been developed."( Forced degradation of tacrolimus and the development of a UHPLC method for impurities determination.
Bergles, J; Grahek, R; Ham, Z; Lušin, TT; Peterka, TR; Urleb, U, 2019
)
1.05
" These formulations were then characterized in vitro and used for oral dosing to beagle dogs."( Assessing the Impact of Endogenously Derived Crystalline Drug on the in Vivo Performance of Amorphous Formulations.
Gao, W; Jenkins, GJ; Osterling, DJ; Purohit, HS; Stolarik, DF; Taylor, LS; Trasi, NS; Zhang, GGZ, 2019
)
0.51
" However, the association between tapering of calcineurin inhibitor dosage and reduction-associated exacerbation is not known."( Safety of tapering tacrolimus dose in patients with well-controlled anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenia gravis.
Fujioka, T; Hatanaka, Y; Hattori, N; Ishibashi, S; Kanai, T; Kaneko, J; Kawaguchi, N; Konno, S; Kuwabara, S; Nakahara, J; Nishida, Y; Nishiyama, K; Noguchi, E; Nomura, K; Nose, Y; Oda, F; Ogawa, T; Ogino, M; Ozawa, Y; Sanjo, N; Sonoo, M; Suzuki, N; Suzuki, S; Takahashi, YK; Uzawa, A; Yokota, T; Yokoyama, K, 2020
)
0.89
"We retrospectively analyzed 115 patients in whom tacrolimus dosage was tapered."( Safety of tapering tacrolimus dose in patients with well-controlled anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenia gravis.
Fujioka, T; Hatanaka, Y; Hattori, N; Ishibashi, S; Kanai, T; Kaneko, J; Kawaguchi, N; Konno, S; Kuwabara, S; Nakahara, J; Nishida, Y; Nishiyama, K; Noguchi, E; Nomura, K; Nose, Y; Oda, F; Ogawa, T; Ogino, M; Ozawa, Y; Sanjo, N; Sonoo, M; Suzuki, N; Suzuki, S; Takahashi, YK; Uzawa, A; Yokota, T; Yokoyama, K, 2020
)
1.14
"Tacrolimus dosage was successfully tapered in 110 patients (96%) without any exacerbation."( Safety of tapering tacrolimus dose in patients with well-controlled anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenia gravis.
Fujioka, T; Hatanaka, Y; Hattori, N; Ishibashi, S; Kanai, T; Kaneko, J; Kawaguchi, N; Konno, S; Kuwabara, S; Nakahara, J; Nishida, Y; Nishiyama, K; Noguchi, E; Nomura, K; Nose, Y; Oda, F; Ogawa, T; Ogino, M; Ozawa, Y; Sanjo, N; Sonoo, M; Suzuki, N; Suzuki, S; Takahashi, YK; Uzawa, A; Yokota, T; Yokoyama, K, 2020
)
2.33
" Early age at onset and a large reduction from maintenance dosage were associated with exacerbation."( Safety of tapering tacrolimus dose in patients with well-controlled anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenia gravis.
Fujioka, T; Hatanaka, Y; Hattori, N; Ishibashi, S; Kanai, T; Kaneko, J; Kawaguchi, N; Konno, S; Kuwabara, S; Nakahara, J; Nishida, Y; Nishiyama, K; Noguchi, E; Nomura, K; Nose, Y; Oda, F; Ogawa, T; Ogino, M; Ozawa, Y; Sanjo, N; Sonoo, M; Suzuki, N; Suzuki, S; Takahashi, YK; Uzawa, A; Yokota, T; Yokoyama, K, 2020
)
0.89
"We conducted a dose-response meta-analysis to quantitatively assess the association between Tac blood concentration and (AR) or adverse effects after KT."( Non-linear Relationship between Tacrolimus Blood Concentration and Acute Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.
Jiang, Y; Li, X; Lin, T; Song, T; Xu, H; Yin, S; Zhang, X, 2019
)
0.8
" A simplified once-daily dosing of immunosuppressive drug regimen may improve medication adherence."( Improvement of medication adherence with simplified once-daily immunosuppressive regimen in stable kidney transplant recipients: A prospective cohort study.
Bang, JB; Cho, HR; Han, SY; Huh, KH; Jeon, JS; Kim, SJ; Kim, YS; Kwon, YJ; Lee, SH; Oh, CK, 2020
)
0.56
" Particularly, the ITBS scores of 4 questions related to the frequency of medication dosing were significantly different between pre-conversion and post-conversion."( Improvement of medication adherence with simplified once-daily immunosuppressive regimen in stable kidney transplant recipients: A prospective cohort study.
Bang, JB; Cho, HR; Han, SY; Huh, KH; Jeon, JS; Kim, SJ; Kim, YS; Kwon, YJ; Lee, SH; Oh, CK, 2020
)
0.56
" Eculizumab was administered at a dosage of 900 mg/wk for the first month and 1200 mg every 2 weeks thereafter."( Renal Transplantation in Patients With Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Single Center Experience.
Alpay, N; Ozçelik, U, 2019
)
0.51
" Based on population pharmacokinetic model, we suggest the TAC dosing algorithm considering the effects of CYP3A5 and MMF drug interaction in stable kidney transplant recipients."( Model based development of tacrolimus dosing algorithm considering CYP3A5 genotypes and mycophenolate mofetil drug interaction in stable kidney transplant recipients.
Han, N; Jang, H; Kim, IW; Kim, JH; Kim, MG; Kim, YS; Kim, YW; Oh, JM; Yu, MY; Yun, HY, 2019
)
0.81
"Total and free plasma prednisolone measurements correlated poorly with saliva measurements; however, correlation improved when concentrations early in the dosing interval were excluded."( Prednisolone Concentrations in Plasma (Total and Unbound) and Saliva of Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Brooks, E; Isbel, NM; McWhinney, B; Staatz, CE; Tett, SE, 2019
)
0.51
" Therapeutic interventions aimed at reducing Tac IPV are targeted on improving MNA, avoiding or adjusting drug interactions, drug dosing assists, and educational support of recipients."( Intrapatient Variability of Tacrolimus Exposure in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Novel Marker for Clinical Outcome.
Kuypers, DRJ, 2020
)
0.85
"6%), and the dosing frequency (36."( A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study of Conversion from Twice-Daily Immediate-Release to Once-Daily Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients in France: The COBALT Study.
Bazin, F; Dubel, L; Dumortier, J; Duvoux, C; Houssel-Debry, P, 2019
)
0.72
"Transplant nurse coordinators are capable of accurately following a protocol for tacrolimus dosage adjustment in a large, racially diverse kidney transplant center."( Protocol-based nurse coordinator management of ambulatory tacrolimus dosing in de novo renal transplant recipients-A single-center experience with a large African American population.
Baliga, P; DuBay, D; Elmaasarani, Z; Fleming, J; Gylten, L; Mardis, C; Patel, N; Pilch, NA; Rao, V; Rohan, V; Taber, DJ, 2019
)
0.98
"The objective of this study is to develop a generic model for tacrolimus pharmacokinetics modelling using a meta-analysis approach, that could serve as a first step towards a prediction tool to inform pharmacokinetics-based optimal dosing of tacrolimus in different populations and indications."( Toward a robust tool for pharmacokinetic-based personalization of treatment with tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation: A model-based meta-analysis approach.
Doan, TTP; Marquet, P; Musuamba, FT; Nanga, TM, 2019
)
0.98
" Data regarding dosage and intrapatient variability changes after conversion among patients with CYP3A4/5 inhibitors (CYPinh) is lacking."( Effect on Dosage Change and Intrapatient Variability After Conversion From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus Among Thai Kidney Transplant Patients With and Without CYP3A4/5 Inhibitors.
Larpparisuth, N; Premasathian, N; Skulratanasak, P; Vongwiwatana, A, 2019
)
0.73
" After conversion, median increment of tacrolimus dosage was 14."( Effect on Dosage Change and Intrapatient Variability After Conversion From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus Among Thai Kidney Transplant Patients With and Without CYP3A4/5 Inhibitors.
Larpparisuth, N; Premasathian, N; Skulratanasak, P; Vongwiwatana, A, 2019
)
1
"Conversion to Adv required a dosage increment of 30% to achieve the same trough level."( Effect on Dosage Change and Intrapatient Variability After Conversion From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus Among Thai Kidney Transplant Patients With and Without CYP3A4/5 Inhibitors.
Larpparisuth, N; Premasathian, N; Skulratanasak, P; Vongwiwatana, A, 2019
)
0.73
" Both venous and capillary microsamples (Mitra; Neoteryx, Torrance, CA) were obtained across 2 separate 12-hour Tac dosing intervals (n = 13 samples/AUC)."( Tacrolimus Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Monitoring, Using Home-Based Volumetric Absorptive Capillary Microsampling.
Åsberg, A; Bergan, S; Gustavsen, MT; Midtvedt, K; Robertsen, I; Vethe, NT, 2020
)
2
" However, whether exposure variability during the immediate postoperative period affects outcomes is unknown, and pharmacogenetic dosing may be limited by residual PK variability."( Early Tacrolimus Concentrations After Lung Transplant Are Predicted by Combined Clinical and Genetic Factors and Associated With Acute Kidney Injury.
Brown, M; Cantu, E; Christie, JD; Diamond, JM; Feng, R; Flesch, JD; Forker, CM; Kalman, L; Localio, AR; Miano, TA; Oyster, M; Porteus, M; Rushefski, M; Shashaty, MGS; Yang, W, 2020
)
1.04
"The present study aimed to optimize the tacrolimus initial dosing scheme in pediatric refractory nephrotic syndrome patients based on population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics."( Optimization of initial dosing scheme of tacrolimus in pediatric refractory nephrotic syndrome patients based on CYP3A5 genotype and coadministration with wuzhi-capsule.
Chen, X; Li, ZP; Wang, DD; Xu, H, 2020
)
1.09
" The combination of ketoconazole-CNIs can reduce the cost of medication for patients by reducing the dosage of CNIs, but its safety is still controversial."( Efficacy and safety of ketoconazole combined with calmodulin inhibitor in solid organ transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, C; Cui, Y; Li, M; Ma, L; Wu, S; Xue, T; Yang, T; Zhou, Y, 2020
)
0.56
" Dosage adjustments based on renal function in the package information are effective in controlling the trough and peak concentrations in similar ranges."( [Clinical Pharmacometrics for Rational Drug Treatment].
Yano, I, 2019
)
0.51
" The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare de novo administration of LCP-TAC and TAC-PR for therapeutic trough levels and daily dosage during the first 30 days after first liver transplant (LT)."( MeltDose Technology vs Once-Daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients.
Adani, GL; Baccarani, U; Baraldo, M; Cherchi, V; Falzone, B; Lorenzin, D; Pravisani, R; Risaliti, A; Velkoski, J, 2019
)
0.76
" Patients were analyzed for daily dosage and trough levels at postoperative days (PODs) 3, 7, 15, and 30."( MeltDose Technology vs Once-Daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients.
Adani, GL; Baccarani, U; Baraldo, M; Cherchi, V; Falzone, B; Lorenzin, D; Pravisani, R; Risaliti, A; Velkoski, J, 2019
)
0.76
"Bodyweight-based dosing of tacrolimus is considered standard care."( A Population Pharmacokinetic Model Does Not Predict the Optimal Starting Dose of Tacrolimus in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients in a Prospective Study: Lessons Learned and Model Improvement.
Andrews, LM; Brüggemann, RJM; Cornelissen, EAM; Cransberg, K; de Jong, H; de Winter, BCM; Hesselink, DA; Schreuder, MF; van Gelder, T, 2020
)
1.08
" As the original dosing algorithm was poorly predictive of tacrolimus exposure, the clinical trial was terminated prematurely."( A Population Pharmacokinetic Model Does Not Predict the Optimal Starting Dose of Tacrolimus in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients in a Prospective Study: Lessons Learned and Model Improvement.
Andrews, LM; Brüggemann, RJM; Cornelissen, EAM; Cransberg, K; de Jong, H; de Winter, BCM; Hesselink, DA; Schreuder, MF; van Gelder, T, 2020
)
1.03
"To evaluate the association between tacrolimus trough levels and dosage in Pakistani patients undergoing live donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and the efficacy and adverse effects at different tacrolimus trough levels and dosages."( Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus in Pakistani Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients.
Ahmad, A; Azam, F; Bhatti, ABH; Dar, FS; Javed, N; Khan, M, 2019
)
1.07
" This could reduce the overall dose and dosing frequency of immunosuppressive drugs, and improve the safety and efficacy of treatment."( Clickable, acid labile immunosuppressive prodrugs for in vivo targeting.
Brudno, Y; Gorantla, VS; Mooney, DJ; Snyder, T; Sobral, MC; Wang, H, 2020
)
0.56
"Although LC-MS provides a more accurate representation of the blood concentration of the parent compound tacrolimus exclusive of metabolite, established cut points for tacrolimus dosing may need to be adjusted to account for the increased risk of renal injury."( Tacrolimus trough monitoring guided by mass spectrometry without accounting for assay differences is associated with acute kidney injury in lung transplant recipients.
Ahearn, P; Blanc, PD; Calabrese, DR; Chong, T; De Marco, T; Florez, R; Golden, J; Greenland, JR; Hays, SR; Henricksen, E; Isaak, K; Kleinhenz, ME; Kolaitis, NA; Kukreja, J; Leard, LE; Lei, HL; Martinez, E; Shah, RJ; Singer, JP; Venado, A, 2019
)
2.17
" Adjusted dosing of mycophenolic acid and tacrolimus with (86%) or without (14%) adjunctive therapies were implemented after diagnosis."( BK Polyomavirus-specific T cell immune responses in kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with BK Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy.
Apiwattanakul, N; Bruminhent, J; Hongeng, S; Kantachuvesiri, S; Klinmalai, C; Pinsai, S; Srisala, S; Watcharananan, SP, 2019
)
0.78
"The high variability of tacrolimus pharmacokinetics early after thoracic organ transplantation is largely due to excessive variability in bioavailability, making individualised dosing based on measured concentrations futile."( High Variability of Whole-Blood Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics Early After Thoracic Organ Transplantation.
De Lange, DW; Grutters, JC; Huitema, ADR; Hunault, CC; Kesecioglu, J; Kirkels, JH; Sikma, MA; Van de Graaf, EA; Van Maarseveen, EM; Verhaar, MC, 2020
)
1.15
" A further consideration highlighted is that different fluid volumes may impact the absorption profile for supersaturating dosage forms."( Absorptive Dissolution Testing: An Improved Approach to Study the Impact of Residual Crystallinity on the Performance of Amorphous Formulations.
Hate, SS; Reutzel-Edens, SM; Taylor, LS, 2020
)
0.56
" Although data from adult renal transplantation trials are used to help guide management decisions in pediatric patients, immunosuppressive therapy in pediatric renal transplant recipients often must be modified because of the unique dosage requirements and clinical effects of these agents in children, including their impact on growth and development."( Immunosuppressants in Organ Transplantation.
Tönshoff, B, 2020
)
0.56
" In the first week after heart and lung transplantation, tacrolimus dosing is difficult due to considerable physiological changes because of clinical instability, and toxicity often occurs, even when tacrolimus concentrations are within the therapeutic range."( Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Impact of Hematocrit on Monitoring and Dosing of Tacrolimus Early After Heart and Lung Transplantation.
De Lange, DW; Huitema, ADR; Hunault, CC; Sikma, MA; Van Maarseveen, EM, 2020
)
1.03
" Herein, we investigated the association between the TAC blood concentration and dosage focusing on the administration route and concomitant use of VRCZ in children."( Tacrolimus blood concentration increase depends on administration route when combined with voriconazole in pediatric stem cell transplant recipients.
Kato, M; Kiyotani, C; Matsumoto, K; Osumi, T; Shioda, Y; Terashima, K; Tomizawa, D; Utano, T; Yamatani, A, 2020
)
2
" The ratio of the TAC blood concentration (ng/mL) to dosage (mg/kg/day) (C/D) was calculated at the last continuous intravenous infusion (C/Div) and after switching to oral administration (C/Dpo)."( Tacrolimus blood concentration increase depends on administration route when combined with voriconazole in pediatric stem cell transplant recipients.
Kato, M; Kiyotani, C; Matsumoto, K; Osumi, T; Shioda, Y; Terashima, K; Tomizawa, D; Utano, T; Yamatani, A, 2020
)
2
"Tacrolimus dosing is routinely tailored based on its trough level (C0) drawn by therapeutic drug monitoring in pediatric patients with primary nephrotic syndrome."( Evaluation of Concentration Errors and Inappropriate Dose Tailoring of Tacrolimus Caused by Sampling-Time Deviations in Pediatric Patients With Primary Nephrotic Syndrome.
Fang, L; Gao, P; Hu, Y; Huang, L; Ji, C; Ni, Y; Wang, H; Wang, J; Wu, M; Yang, J; Zhang, H; Zhang, L; Zhu, Z, 2020
)
2.23
" Ultimately, the inappropriate dosing possibly misled by incorrect C0 was simulated in a real-patient cohort according to the target range (5-10 ng/mL)."( Evaluation of Concentration Errors and Inappropriate Dose Tailoring of Tacrolimus Caused by Sampling-Time Deviations in Pediatric Patients With Primary Nephrotic Syndrome.
Fang, L; Gao, P; Hu, Y; Huang, L; Ji, C; Ni, Y; Wang, H; Wang, J; Wu, M; Yang, J; Zhang, H; Zhang, L; Zhu, Z, 2020
)
0.79
" In addition, de novo dosing tacrolimus ER has revealed that African Americans require approximately 20%-30% higher doses than Caucasians to achieve similar levels."( Dosing Requirements of Extended-Release Tacrolimus (Astagraf XL) in African American Kidney Transplant Recipients Converted from Immediate-Release Tacrolimus (AAAKTRS).
Fleming, JN; Posadas Salas, MA; Taber, DJ, 2020
)
1.12
" Six weeks after complete resolution of the ulcer, MMF at a dosage of 250 mg twice daily was initiated; the dosage was subsequently increased to 500 mg twice daily without a recurrence of ulceration."( Mycophenolate-induced oral ulcers: Case report and literature review.
Asare, K; Gatzke, CB, 2020
)
0.56
"Extended release LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT) allows once-daily dosing in transplant recipients."( The use of LCP-Tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant recipients.
Ajaimy, M; Akalin, E; Azzi, Y; Campbell, A; Graham, JA; Kinkhabwala, M; Konicki, A; Liriano-Ward, L; Pynadath, C; Rocca, JP; Torabi, J, 2020
)
1.23
" The once daily dosing may facilitate medication adherence and result in improved long-term outcomes."( The use of LCP-Tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant recipients.
Ajaimy, M; Akalin, E; Azzi, Y; Campbell, A; Graham, JA; Kinkhabwala, M; Konicki, A; Liriano-Ward, L; Pynadath, C; Rocca, JP; Torabi, J, 2020
)
0.91
"The aim of the present study was to develop a new multi-unit dosage formulation, Universal ORbicular Vehicle (UniORV), to improve the biopharmaceutical properties of tacrolimus (TAC)."( UniORV, a New Multi-Unit Dosage Form, Improved Biopharmaceutical Properties of Tacrolimus in Rats and Humans.
Endo, N; Hirasawa, W; Makino, K; Matahira, Y; Mineda, M; Onoue, S; Sato, H; Sei, S; Tsukada, R, 2020
)
0.98
"The new dosage form UniORV is a promising approach to improve the dissolution, amorphous stability, and biopharmaceutical properties of TAC, which is a poorly water-soluble drug."( UniORV, a New Multi-Unit Dosage Form, Improved Biopharmaceutical Properties of Tacrolimus in Rats and Humans.
Endo, N; Hirasawa, W; Makino, K; Matahira, Y; Mineda, M; Onoue, S; Sato, H; Sei, S; Tsukada, R, 2020
)
0.79
" In this study, we aimed to investigate the population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) of tacrolimus in patients with MG and to develop model-informed dosing regimens."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Tacrolimus in Adult Chinese Patients with Myasthenia Gravis: A Prospective Study.
Cai, XJ; Guo, YP; Jiao, Z; Li, ZR; Liu, J; Wu, H; Xi, JY; Zhao, CB, 2020
)
1.05
" Monte Carlo simulations based on the established model were employed to design dosing regimens."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Tacrolimus in Adult Chinese Patients with Myasthenia Gravis: A Prospective Study.
Cai, XJ; Guo, YP; Jiao, Z; Li, ZR; Liu, J; Wu, H; Xi, JY; Zhao, CB, 2020
)
0.83
"The most accurate dosing of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was observed in patients receiving MMF with tacrolimus, 70."( Pharmacokinetic evaluation of MFF in combinations with tacrolimus and cyclosporine. Findings of C0 and AUC.
Kaduševičius, E; Marquet, P; Maslauskienë, R; Radzevičienė, A; Saint-Marcoux, F; Stankevičius, E, 2020
)
1.02
" We aimed to obtain more information regarding the influence of various covariates on the disposition of tacrolimus in the early phase after cardiac transplantation using a population pharmacokinetic method, and provide information for the individualisation of drug dosing in the clinical setting."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in Chinese cardiac transplant recipients.
Gong, Y; Li, J; Li, X; Lu, Y; Sun, Y; Yang, M, 2020
)
1.04
" Based on the simulation results, a simple-touse dosage regimen table to guide clinicians with drug dosing was created."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in Chinese cardiac transplant recipients.
Gong, Y; Li, J; Li, X; Lu, Y; Sun, Y; Yang, M, 2020
)
0.83
"The final population model could provide information for the individualised dosing of tacrolimus for cardiac transplant recipients."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in Chinese cardiac transplant recipients.
Gong, Y; Li, J; Li, X; Lu, Y; Sun, Y; Yang, M, 2020
)
1.05
" For cyclosporine dosed at 25 and 35 mg/kg/day, MST was 15 days (12-18 days) and 21 days (14-27 days)."( Efficacy of single-agent immunosuppressive regimens in a murine model of vascularized composite allotransplantation.
Beck, SE; Brandacher, G; Chol Oh, B; Etra, JW; Furtmüller, GJ; Guo, Y; Kalsi, R; Messner, F; Schneeberger, S, 2020
)
0.56
" Oral dosing of PRCL-02 was well tolerated and resulted in suppressed T-cell proliferation in in vitro MLR comparable to animals in the tacrolimus control arm."( Targeting Calcium Release-activated Calcium Channel Is Not Sufficient to Prevent Rejection in Nonhuman Primate Kidney Transplantation.
Ezekian, B; Farris, AB; Fortier, C; Freischlag, K; Knechtle, SJ; Kwun, J; Manook, M; Park, J; Rao, PE; Sloan-Lancaster, J; Song, M; Yoon, J, 2020
)
0.76
"Drug dosing for Tacrolimus (TAC) and Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) after kidney transplantation remains challenging."( A new model to determine Optimal Exposure to Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil after renal transplantation.
Gruessner, A; Gruessner, R; Laftavi, MR; Onan, E; Pankewycz, O; Rucker, D; Wang, D, 2020
)
1.16
"The development of predictive engines based on pharmacokinetic-physiological mathematical models for personalised dosage recommendations is an immature field."( Predictive engines based on pharmacokinetics modelling for tacrolimus personalized dosage in paediatric renal transplant patients.
Borobia, A; Carcas-Sansuan, A; Prado-Velasco, M, 2020
)
0.8
" Current concepts aim to optimize dosing strategies to reduce side effects."( Low-dose alemtuzumab induction in a tailored immunosuppression protocol for sensitized kidney transplant recipients.
Althaus, K; Bakchoul, T; Berger, K; Guthoff, M; Heyne, N; Königsrainer, A; Mühlbacher, T; Nadalin, S; Steurer, W, 2020
)
0.56
" Twice-daily intermittent IV tacrolimus dosing may confer safety and convenience benefits."( Twice-daily intravenous bolus tacrolimus infusion: A safe and effective regimen for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis.
Baize, T; Bhandari, S; Emmons, R; Figg, L; Hashmi, H; Hegazi, M; Krem, MM; Kumar, R; Rhodes, JB; Tripathi, P, 2020
)
1.14
" Moreover, Tacrolimus has narrow therapeutic index and thus it is essential to prevent its possible toxic effects when a modified release dosage form is administered."( Topical delivery of Tacrolimus using liposome containing gel: An emerging and synergistic approach in management of psoriasis.
Awasthi, R; Jindal, S; Kulkarni, GT; Singhare, D, 2020
)
1.27
" During surgery, MP was administered at a dose of 500 mg; thereafter, the dosage was tapered rapidly, and the drug was discontinued on day 14 post transplant."( Early Steroid Withdrawal Protocol With Basiliximab and Rituximab in ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Koyama, I; Nakajima, I; Shirai, H; Tojimbara, T; Yamazaki, T; Yashima, J,
)
0.13
"Genetic analysis of polymorphisms implicated in drug metabolism and tacrolimus trough levels may help to forecast the risk of acute rejection and individualize drug dosage in children undergoing renal transplantation."( CYP and SXR gene polymorphisms influence in opposite ways acute rejection rate in pediatric patients with renal transplant.
Edefonti, A; Ghio, L; Montini, G; Morello, W; Testa, S; Turolo, S, 2020
)
0.79
"The purpose of our research was to recommend the initial tacrolimus dosage for Chinese pediatric patients undergoing kidney transplantation based on population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics."( Initial dosage optimization of tacrolimus in Chinese pediatric patients undergoing kidney transplantation based on population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics.
Chen, X; Li, ZP; Wang, DD; Xu, H, 2020
)
1.09
" The first assessed the effect of morning versus evening dosing on the pharmacokinetic profile of LCPT 2 mg; the second assessed the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic profile of LCPT 5 mg."( Chronopharmacokinetics and Food Effects of Single-Dose LCP-Tacrolimus in Healthy Volunteers.
Alloway, RR; Brennan, DC; Cohen, EA; Kerr, J; Meier-Kriesche, U; Momper, JD; Moten, MA; Stevens, DR; Trofe-Clark, J, 2020
)
0.8
"No significant differences were observed between evening and morning dosing in peak blood concentration (4."( Chronopharmacokinetics and Food Effects of Single-Dose LCP-Tacrolimus in Healthy Volunteers.
Alloway, RR; Brennan, DC; Cohen, EA; Kerr, J; Meier-Kriesche, U; Momper, JD; Moten, MA; Stevens, DR; Trofe-Clark, J, 2020
)
0.8
" The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of three times daily to twice a day dosing of tacrolimus in pediatric kidney transplant recipients at a major tertiary care transplant center."( Efficacy and safety of three times daily dosing of tacrolimus in pediatric kidney transplantation patients: A single-center comparative study.
Al-Jedai, A; Alabdulkarim, Z; Alhasan, K; Alkortas, D; Devol, E, 2020
)
1.02
"Effective tacrolimus (TAC) dosing is hampered by complex pharmacokinetics and significant patient variability."( Gut microbial diversity, inflammation, and oxidative stress are associated with tacrolimus dosing requirements early after heart transplantation.
Bohn, B; Brunjes, D; Colombo, PC; Demmer, RT; Farr, M; Gaine, M; Garan, AR; Hupf, J; Jennings, DL; Latif, F; Naka, Y; Nandakumar, R; Onat, D; Restaino, S; Royzman, E; Takayama, H; Takeda, K; Topkara, VK; Uhlemann, AC; Yuzefpolskaya, M; Zuver, A, 2020
)
1.19
"Although the association between CYP3A5 gene polymorphism and tacrolimus dosing requirements was well established, the impact on how CYP3A5 genotype affects the acute rejection and long-term renal function in patients who received kidney transplants and were treated with tacrolimus remained controversial."( Influence of CYP3A5 Genetic Polymorphism on Long-Term Renal Function in Chinese Kidney Transplant Recipients Using Limited Sampling Strategy and Abbreviated Area Under the Curve for Tacrolimus Monitoring.
Bekers, O; Chak, WL; Chan, KM; Cheung, CY; van Hooff, JP; Wong, YT, 2020
)
0.99
" B cell activating factor plasma levels were significantly higher after ixazomib dosing in those who remained cGVHD free compared with those developed cGVHD."( Ixazomib for Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Abedin, S; Chhabra, S; D'Souza, A; Dhakal, B; Douglas Rizzo, J; Drobyski, WR; Fenske, TS; Hamadani, M; Hari, PN; Horowitz, MM; Jerkins, JH; Pasquini, MC; Runaas, L; Saber, W; Shah, NN; Shaw, BE; Tang, X; Thompson, R; Visotcky, A; Zhang, MJ; Zhu, F, 2020
)
0.56
" Genetic variation in CYP3A5 expression affects tacrolimus dosing requirements, and knowing the CYP3A5 genotype of transplant patients may allow better dose prediction compared with current standard dosing recommendations in a multi-ethnic population."( CYP3A5 polymorphisms and their effects on tacrolimus exposure in an ethnically diverse South African renal transplant population.
Barday, Z; Dandara, C; Ensor, J; Freercks, R; Manning, K; Mhandire, D; Muller, WK, 2020
)
1.08
" This post hoc analysis examined dosing trends, relative efficacy, and safety of LCPT (n=247) and IR-Tac (n=249) in slow, intermediate, and rapid metabolizers as defined by concentration/dose ratios at day 30."( Effect of Concentration/Dose Ratio in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving LCP-Tacrolimus or Immediate-Release Tacrolimus: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3 Clinical Trial.
Budde, K; Bunnapradist, S; Meier-Kriesche, U; Morganti, R; Procaccianti, C; Stevens, DR; Suwelack, B, 2020
)
0.78
" However, TAC high intra- and inter-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability makes it more laborious to accurately predict the appropriate dosage required for a given patient."( Predictors of tacrolimus pharmacokinetic variability: current evidences and future perspectives.
Bindels, LB; Chaib Eddour, D; Degraeve, AL; Elens, L; Haufroid, V; Moudio, S; Mourad, M, 2020
)
0.92
"Tacrolimus dosing immediately posttransplant is based on body weight."( Body weight-based initial dosing of tacrolimus in renal transplantation: Is this an ideal approach?
Bhutani, S; Chinnadurai, R; Ibrahim, ST; Kalra, PA; Tay, T, 2021
)
2.34
"This study aimed to estimate the effect of body mass index (BMI) and the weight-based dosing on tacrolimus trough levels in recipients of renal transplants."( Body weight-based initial dosing of tacrolimus in renal transplantation: Is this an ideal approach?
Bhutani, S; Chinnadurai, R; Ibrahim, ST; Kalra, PA; Tay, T, 2021
)
1.11
" There was no adverse relationship evident between tacrolimus dosing or concentration and graft function."( Body weight-based initial dosing of tacrolimus in renal transplantation: Is this an ideal approach?
Bhutani, S; Chinnadurai, R; Ibrahim, ST; Kalra, PA; Tay, T, 2021
)
1.15
"Our study showed that standard dosing of tacrolimus based on body weight in individuals who were obese did not adversely affect their tacrolimus concentrations or transplant function."( Body weight-based initial dosing of tacrolimus in renal transplantation: Is this an ideal approach?
Bhutani, S; Chinnadurai, R; Ibrahim, ST; Kalra, PA; Tay, T, 2021
)
1.16
" This study aimed to (1) investigate clinical determinants influencing tacrolimus PK, and (2) identify areas requiring additional research to facilitate the use of population PK models to guide tacrolimus dosing decisions."( Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Tacrolimus in Adult Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review.
Carland, JE; Day, RO; Hennig, S; Kirubakaran, R; Stocker, SL, 2020
)
1.06
" The level of MPA, CsA, and TAC in PBMCs might be more stable during dosing interval."( Establishment of a Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for the Determination of Immunosuppressant Levels in the Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of Chinese Renal Transplant Recipients.
An, HM; Chen, B; Lu, JQ; Shao, K; Shi, HQ; Zhai, XH; Zhou, PJ, 2020
)
0.56
" As the long-term use of immunosuppressive agents (ISAs) may result in off-target systemic toxicity and complications, minimizing the ISA dosage while preserving the pharmacological efficacy could be a promising solution to address these challenges."( Target-oriented delivery of self-assembled immunosuppressant cocktails prolongs allogeneic orthotopic liver transplant survival.
Chen, X; Wan, J; Wang, H; Xie, H; Xu, X; Yang, Z; Zhang, L; Zheng, S; Zhou, K; Zhou, L; Zhu, H, 2020
)
0.56
"To establish a PPK model of tacrolimus in children with β-TM and optimize initial dosing regimen for achieving target concentration of 5 to 15 ng/mL."( Initial Dosage Optimization of Tacrolimus in Pediatric Patients With Thalassemia Major Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Based on Population Pharmacokinetics.
Chen, M; Li, C; Li, Q; Liu, T; Lu, J; Lv, C; Wei, Y; Zhang, R; Zhou, S, 2021
)
1.2
" The proposed dosage regimen reached a good PTA, which could provide a reference for tacrolimus therapy."( Initial Dosage Optimization of Tacrolimus in Pediatric Patients With Thalassemia Major Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Based on Population Pharmacokinetics.
Chen, M; Li, C; Li, Q; Liu, T; Lu, J; Lv, C; Wei, Y; Zhang, R; Zhou, S, 2021
)
1.13
" In 3 of the 4 patients, hepatitis was poorly responsive to standard therapy with steroids, azathioprine, or tacrolimus; however, sustained biochemical remission of hepatitis was induced after more aggressive immunosuppressive therapies including Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) at standard immunosuppressive therapy (IST) dosing for severe Aplastic Anemia (sAA)."( Outcomes of Severe Seronegative Hepatitis-associated Aplastic Anemia: A Pediatric Case Series.
Brigham, D; Feldman, AG; Kemme, S; Lovell, MA; Mack, C; Nakano, T; Stahl, M, 2021
)
0.83
" We propose that equine ATG based IST at standard dosing regimen for sAA is a therapy that in select cases can be considered early on in the treatment course and could lead to a sustained remission of both hepatitis and sAA."( Outcomes of Severe Seronegative Hepatitis-associated Aplastic Anemia: A Pediatric Case Series.
Brigham, D; Feldman, AG; Kemme, S; Lovell, MA; Mack, C; Nakano, T; Stahl, M, 2021
)
0.62
" The dosage of prednisone also reduced at the end of the observation period with only 6 adverse events reported."( Therapeutic and Immunoregulatory Effects of Tacrolimus in Patients with Refractory Generalized Myasthenia Gravis.
Jing, S; Liu, J; Song, J; Wang, L; Wang, Y; Wang, Z; Wu, H; Xi, J; Yan, C; Zhao, C, 2020
)
0.82
" CYP3A5 genotyping has a certain guiding significance for determining the dosage of tacrolimus."( [Clinical effect of tacrolimus in the treatment of myasthenia gravis in children].
Ding, CH; Fang, F; Gong, S; Li, JW; Lyu, JL; Ren, CH; Ren, XT; Wang, X; Wang, XH; Wu, HS; Yang, XY; Zhang, WH, 2020
)
1.11
"Prescribing appropriate Tacrolimus (Tac) dosing is still a challenge for clinicians due to the interindividual variability in dose requirement and the narrow therapeutic index."( Dosing algorithm for Tacrolimus in Tunisian Kidney transplant patients: Effect of CYP 3A4*1B and CYP3A4*22 polymorphisms.
A Boughattas, N; Aouam, K; Ben-Fadhel, N; Ben-Fredj, N; Ben-Romdhane, H; Chadli, Z; Hannachi, I, 2020
)
1.18
" survival, acute rejection, re-transplantation), patients therapy adherence, and infections requiring the need to reduce individual immunosuppressant dosing will be evaluated for each patient."( Evaluation of the impact of Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression on Heidelberg liver transplant cohort (HDTACRO): Study protocol for an investigator initiated, non-interventional prospective study.
Abbasi Dezfouli, S; Alamdari, P; Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh, S; Ghamarnejad, O; Khajeh, E; Lemekhova, A; Majlesara, A; Mehrabi, A; Mieth, M; Nickkholgh, A; Polychronidis, G; Ramouz, A; Rupp, C; Saracevic, M; Weiss, KH, 2020
)
0.85
" Tacrolimus levels and dosage requirements were compared before and during antifungal therapy."( Effects of antifungal drugs on the plasma concentrations and dosage of tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients.
Cheng, S; Du, J; Tang, M; Yin, T, 2022
)
1.86
" In this article, the authors explored the impact of obesity on tacrolimus exposure in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and estimated a more suitable initial dosage in this population."( Tacrolimus Exposure in Obese Patients: and A Case-Control Study in Kidney Transplantation.
Decourchelle, N; Gruliere, AS; Legris, T; Manos-Sampol, E; Manson, T; Moal, V; Quaranta, S; Robert, T; Robert, V, 2021
)
2.3
" Drug concentrations in blood, selected morphological and biochemical parameters, and the genetic variation of IL-10 (-1082A > G) which may affect immunosuppressant dosage and risk of acute graft rejection were analyzed."( The effect of genetic variations for interleukin-10 (IL-10) on the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy in patients after kidney transplantation.
Bartkowiak-Wieczorek, J; Bogacz, A; Czerny, B; Dziewanowski, K; Grześkowiak, E; Kotowski, M; Machaliński, B; Ostrowski, M; Polaszewska, A; Sieńko, J; Sieńko, M; Tejchman, K, 2020
)
0.56
" Discontinuation or dosage reduction of immunosuppressives and other treatment information was documented."( Clinical course of COVID-19 disease in immunosuppressed renal transplant patients
Ateş, ÖF; Çetin, ES; Dheir, H; Fırat, N; Genç, AB; Karabay, O; Köroğlu, M; Muratdağı, G; Özmen, K; Sipahi, S; Tomak, Y; Yaylacı, S, 2021
)
0.62
" dosing in organ transplant patients, using Xgboost machine learning (ML) models."( Tacrolimus Exposure Prediction Using Machine Learning.
Debord, J; Labriffe, M; Marquet, P; Woillard, JB, 2021
)
2.06
"Tacrolimus is a narrow therapeutic index medication, which requires therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize dosing based on systemic exposure."( Validation of a Capillary Dry Blood Sample MITRA-Based Assay for the Quantitative Determination of Systemic Tacrolimus Concentrations in Transplant Recipients.
Aluvihare, V; Anaokar, S; Dawson, I; Hussain, I; Kamar, N; Kazeem, G; Saliba, F; Torpey, N; Undre, N, 2021
)
2.28
" An elevated tacrolimus level likely contributed to her TMA and a decrease in dosage improved her clinical picture and laboratory markers."( Thrombotic Microangiopathy in a Pregnant Woman With Kidney Transplantation: A Case Report.
Cantarovich, M; Cherniak, V; Demir, KK; Do, AT; Malhamé, I; Naessens, V; Podymow, T; Ponette, V; Sandal, S; Wou, K, 2021
)
0.99
" A dosing simulation strategy based on observed trough concentrations (rather than model-based predictions) resulted in 12% more patients successfully achieving tacrolimus trough concentrations within the institutional target range (5-10 ng/ml)."( Evaluation of the performance of a prior tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic kidney transplant model among adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.
Armistead, PM; Campagne, O; Crona, DJ; Flynn, G; Mager, DE; Miller, JA; Patel, T; Ptachcinski, JR; Suzuki, O; Torrice, CD; Weiner, DL; Wiltshire, T; Zhu, J, 2021
)
1.08
" The objective of this study was to develop a model of tacrolimus clearance with a dosing equation accounting for genotypes and clinical factors in adult kidney transplant recipients of European ancestry that could preemptively guide dosing."( Precision Dosing for Tacrolimus Using Genotypes and Clinical Factors in Kidney Transplant Recipients of European Ancestry.
Al-Kofahi, M; Dorr, CR; Guan, W; Israni, AK; Jacobson, PA; Mannon, RB; Matas, AJ; Oetting, WS; Remmel, RP; Schladt, DP; Wu, B, 2021
)
1.19
" On topical application, the TAC concentrations in rabbit cornea and conjunctiva one hour after dosing were 4452 ± 2289 and 516 ± 180 ng/g of tissue, respectively."( A polymeric aqueous tacrolimus formulation for topical ocular delivery.
Abdulrahman, NS; Badr, MY; Schatzlein, AG; Uchegbu, IF, 2021
)
0.94
" Overall, dosing had to be changed in 4 (14."( STABIL-study: The Course of Therapy, Safety and Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Conversion of Prograf® to Tacrolimus HEXAL®/Crilomus® in Renal Transplant Recipients - an Observational Study in Germany.
Budde, K; Dienes, K; Halleck, F; Kalb, K; Lehner, LJ; Pein, U; Roehle, R; Schenker, P; Seeger, W; Weigand, K, 2021
)
0.84
" Total daily dose was divided by trough concentration for each route to determine the dosing ratio of SL:PO."( Use of sublingual tacrolimus in adults undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant: A pilot study.
Alkhateeb, H; Bartoo, GT; Hogan, WJ; Litzow, MR; May, HP; Shah, MV; Wolf, RC, 2022
)
1.06
" Due to wide interindividual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability, optimizing TAC dosing based on genetic factors is required to minimize nephrotoxicity and acute rejections."( Unraveling the Genomic Architecture of the CYP3A Locus and ADME Genes for Personalized Tacrolimus Dosing.
Cho, Y; Choi, S; Ha, J; Jang, IJ; Kim, BJ; Kim, HK; Kim, MS; Kim, YJ; Lee, MG; Min, S; Moon, S; Oh, J; Park, JB; Shin, HS; Song, SH; Yang, CW; Yang, J; Yoon, HE; Yoon, JG, 2021
)
0.84
"527; dosing adherence, ρ = - 0."( Association between medication adherence and intrapatient variability in tacrolimus concentration among stable kidney transplant recipients.
Chung, C; Ha, J; Han, A; Kim, HK; Ko, H; Min, S; Min, SK, 2021
)
0.85
" Radiographic and histological evaluations revealed that 100 % of defects healed well regardless of tacrolimus dosage or duration."( Healing of sub-critical femoral osteotomies in mice is unaffected by tacrolimus and deletion of recombination activating gene 1.
Bartnikowski, M; Evans, CH; Glatt, V; Liu, TY; Millard, SM; Pettit, AR; Sokolowski, KA; Veitch, M; Wells, JW; Wu, AC, 2021
)
1.07
" Furthermore, a dosing algorithm that includes demographic and clinical factors plus multiple genetic variants should be added for consideration, and may optimize early tacrolimus exposure."( Clinical Impact of the Adaptation of Initial Tacrolimus Dosing to the CYP3A5 Genotype After Kidney Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Hu, X; Liu, L; Sun, Y; Wang, W; Yang, H; Yu, X; Zhang, X, 2021
)
1.08
"Our study highlights the importance of incorporating age, organ type, and genotype in predicting tacrolimus levels and lays the groundwork for developing an individualized age and organ-specific genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing algorithm."( An Integrated Clinical and Genetic Prediction Model for Tacrolimus Levels in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.
Allen, U; Berka, N; Birk, P; Blydt-Hansen, T; Campbell, P; Daniel, C; Foster, BJ; Grasemann, H; Hamiwka, L; Lambert, AN; Litalien, C; Min, S; Mital, S; Ng, V; Papaz, T; Parekh, R; Saw, CL; Tinckam, K; Urschel, S; Van Driest, SL, 2022
)
1.19
" The doses required to achieve therapeutic tacrolimus troughs were significantly lower in all age groups compared with the current FDA de novo dosing recommendation."( Clinical Experience with Extended-Release Tacrolimus in Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Hagopian, JC; Horwedel, TA; January, SE; Nesselhauf, NM; Progar, K; Santos, RD, 2021
)
1.15
" Wuzhi Capsule (WZC) is a commonly used TAC-sparing agent in Chinese SOT to reduce TAC dosing due to its inhibitory effect on TAC metabolism by enzymes of the CYP3A subfamily."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing guidelines for tacrolimus co-administration with Wuzhi capsule in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Fu, Q; Hou, X; Jiao, Z; Jing, Y; Kong, Y; Liu, H; Peng, H; Wei, X, 2021
)
0.86
"Wuzhi Capsule co-administration and CYP3A5 variants affect the PK of TAC Dosing guidelines are made based on the PPK model to allow individualized administration of TAC, especially when co-administered with WZC."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing guidelines for tacrolimus co-administration with Wuzhi capsule in Chinese renal transplant recipients.
Fu, Q; Hou, X; Jiao, Z; Jing, Y; Kong, Y; Liu, H; Peng, H; Wei, X, 2021
)
0.86
" In addition, there was a correlation between serum dosage of tacrolimus and the development of SAH (P=0."( PREVALENCE AND TIME OF DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMIC ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION IN PATIENTS AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANTATION.
Lemos, BO; Silva, RCMA; Silva, RFD,
)
0.37
" We transitioned our tacrolimus protocol from oral to sublingual dosing in pancreas transplant patients beginning January 1, 2017."( Safety and Efficacy of Perioperative Sublingual Tacrolimus in Pancreas Transplant Compared With Oral Tacrolimus.
Gonzales, H; Kalbavi, V; Patel, N; Perez, C; Rohan, V; Taber, DJ, 2021
)
1.2
" This is an important step in personalizing the dosage of TAC post-transplant to improve outcomes post-transplant."( Dynamic prediction based on variability of a longitudinal biomarker.
Campbell, KR; Davis, S; Juarez-Colunga, E; Martins, R, 2021
)
0.62
"To determine if a reliable weight-based dosing strategy could be utilized to transition kidney transplant patients from immediate-release to extended-release tacrolimus."( Evaluation of Weight-Based Dose During Transition From Immediate-Release to Extended-Release Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Byrns, J; Lee, HJ; Magid, M; Sanoff, S; Yang, Z, 2023
)
1.33
"Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to guide tacrolimus dosing because of its narrow therapeutic window and considerable pharmacokinetic variability."( Tacrolimus Therapy in Adult Heart Transplant Recipients: Evaluation of a Bayesian Forecasting Software.
Carland, JE; Carlos, L; Day, RO; Kirubakaran, R; Stocker, SL, 2021
)
2.31
" The concordance of tacrolimus dosing and monitoring according to hospital guidelines was assessed."( Tacrolimus Therapy in Adult Heart Transplant Recipients: Evaluation of a Bayesian Forecasting Software.
Carland, JE; Carlos, L; Day, RO; Kirubakaran, R; Stocker, SL, 2021
)
2.39
"Tacrolimus dosing and monitoring were discordant with the guidelines."( Tacrolimus Therapy in Adult Heart Transplant Recipients: Evaluation of a Bayesian Forecasting Software.
Carland, JE; Carlos, L; Day, RO; Kirubakaran, R; Stocker, SL, 2021
)
3.51
" Pathologists should be aware of these associations because colitis often resolves with decreasing drug dosage rather than treatment directed toward inflammatory bowel disease."( Histologic Features of Tacrolimus-induced Colonic Injury.
Hissong, E; Mostyka, M; Yantiss, RK, 2022
)
1.03
" These findings offer a rationale for the personalization of tacrolimus dosing regimens."( Estimation of Tacrolimus Clearance in Saudi Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Alenazi, M; Alqahtani, S; Alsarhani, E; Alsultan, A,
)
0.73
" All dosing regimens were maintained for 7 days."( Drug-drug interaction comparison between tacrolimus and phenobarbital in different formulations for paediatrics and adults.
Chen, J; Liu, W; Lu, X; Wang, N; Zhang, Y; Zhao, X; Zhu, L; Zuo, M, 2021
)
0.89
" During the first 3 y after transplant, CYP3A5 expressers tended to have lower tacrolimus trough levels than nonexpressers, although their tacrolimus dosage was as much as 80% higher."( Development of De Novo Donor-specific HLA Antibodies and AMR in Renal Transplant Patients Depends on CYP3A5 Genotype.
Eisenberger, U; Friebus-Kardash, J; Heinemann, FM; Kribben, A; Möhlendick, B; Nela, E; Siffert, W, 2022
)
0.95
" A model-informed dosing strategy was proposed by the established model, and MMF dose adjustment should be based on ALB levels and the post-transplantation time."( Genetic polymorphisms in metabolic enzymes and transporters have no impact on mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in adult kidney transplant patients co-treated with tacrolimus: A population analysis.
Feng, LJ; Jiao, Z; Liao, GY; Sheng, CC; Su, Y; Xia, Q; Xu, DJ; Yang, CL, 2021
)
0.82
"One of the most commonly used immunosuppressants in organ transplant, tacrolimus exhibits wide interpatient and intrapatient variability and narrow therapeutic index that necessitates routine concentration monitoring and dosage adjustments."( Comparing the pharmacokinetics of extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-TAC) to immediate-release formulations in kidney transplant patients.
Bunnapradist, S; Tan, T, 2021
)
1.11
" We have then generated by simulation a personalised dosing strategy based on the model that could improve the early attainment of therapeutic trough levels by almost doubling the proportion of patients within target range (69."( Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Strategies for Envarsus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Patients Using Population Modelling and Simulations.
Cella, M; Govoni, M; Henin, E; Laveille, C; Piotti, G, 2021
)
0.62
" The model could guide a personalised dosing strategy early after transplantation."( Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Strategies for Envarsus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Patients Using Population Modelling and Simulations.
Cella, M; Govoni, M; Henin, E; Laveille, C; Piotti, G, 2021
)
0.62
" One such extended-release formulation of tacrolimus known as LCPT allows once-daily dosing and improves bioavailability compared to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-tacrolimus)."( De novo tacrolimus extended-release tablets (LCPT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus in adult heart transplantation: Results of a single-center non-inferiority matched control trial.
Carey, SA; Cheung, ZO; Clark, DM; Doss, AK; Felius, J; Gottlieb, RL; Guerrero-Miranda, CY; Hall, SA; Jamil, AK; Kale, P; Kerlee, KR; Martits-Chalangari, K; Sam, T; van Zyl, JS, 2021
)
1.32
"Identification of the most appropriate population pharmacokinetic model-based Bayesian estimation is required prior to its implementation in routine clinical practice to inform tacrolimus dosing decisions."( Evaluation of published population pharmacokinetic models to inform tacrolimus dosing in adult heart transplant recipients.
Carland, JE; Day, RO; Hennig, S; Kirubakaran, R; Maslen, B; Stocker, SL, 2022
)
1.15
" The performance of each model was evaluated using: (i) prediction-based assessment (bias and imprecision) of the individual predicted tacrolimus concentration of the fourth dosing occasion (MAXEVAL = 0, FOCE-I) from 1-3 prior dosing occasions; and (ii) simulation-based assessment (prediction-corrected visual predictive check)."( Evaluation of published population pharmacokinetic models to inform tacrolimus dosing in adult heart transplant recipients.
Carland, JE; Day, RO; Hennig, S; Kirubakaran, R; Maslen, B; Stocker, SL, 2022
)
1.16
"Regardless of the number of prior dosing occasions (1-3) and concomitant azole antifungal use, all models demonstrated unacceptable individual predicted tacrolimus concentration of the fourth dosing occasion (n = 152)."( Evaluation of published population pharmacokinetic models to inform tacrolimus dosing in adult heart transplant recipients.
Carland, JE; Day, RO; Hennig, S; Kirubakaran, R; Maslen, B; Stocker, SL, 2022
)
1.16
" tacrolimus exposure to determine whether the current genotype-guided dosing recommendations are appropriate for this formulation."( Impact of Pharmacogenetics on Intravenous Tacrolimus Exposure and Conversions to Oral Therapy.
Frame, D; Gersch, CL; Hertz, DL; Kidwell, KM; Li, Y; Marcath, LA; Nguyen, V; Pasternak, AL; Rae, JM; Scappaticci, G, 2022
)
1.9
" However, achieving adequate adherence can be difficult secondary to complicated dosing regimens, side effects, and mental/emotional barriers."( Adherence to immunosuppression in adult heart transplant recipients: A systematic review.
Badawy, SM; Hussain, T; Nassetta, K; O'Dwyer, LC; Wilcox, JE, 2021
)
0.62
" Finally, a simplified dosing regimen with once-a-day tacrolimus as well as use of a mobile phone-based intervention were associated with improved adherence."( Adherence to immunosuppression in adult heart transplant recipients: A systematic review.
Badawy, SM; Hussain, T; Nassetta, K; O'Dwyer, LC; Wilcox, JE, 2021
)
0.87
" In this setting, the personalization of steroid dosage might prevent an over exposure to the drug, but this strategy is not available yet."( [Steroidi tra necessità e tossicità].
Affatato, S; Lucca, B; Sandrini, S, 2021
)
0.62
" However, a comparison of 10 machine learning model-based TAC pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic dosing algorithms for kidney transplant perioperative patients of Chinese descent has not been reported."( Machine learning-based method for tacrolimus dose predictions in Chinese kidney transplant perioperative patients.
Cao, L; Deng, P; Fu, Q; Hou, X; Jiang Mr, X; Jing, Y; Kong, Y; Liu Mr, G; Liu, H; Peng, H; Wei, X; Xiao, J; Xiao, P, 2022
)
1
" The ETR model successfully predicted the ideal TAC dosage in 97."( Machine learning-based method for tacrolimus dose predictions in Chinese kidney transplant perioperative patients.
Cao, L; Deng, P; Fu, Q; Hou, X; Jiang Mr, X; Jing, Y; Kong, Y; Liu Mr, G; Liu, H; Peng, H; Wei, X; Xiao, J; Xiao, P, 2022
)
1
" Population PK studies for oral medications performed using EHR data often assume a regular dosing schedule as prescribed without incorporating exact dosing time."( Sensitivity of estimated tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic profile to assumed dose timing and absorption in real-world data and simulated data.
Beck, C; Birdwell, KA; Choi, L; Van Driest, SL; Weeks, HL; Williams, ML, 2022
)
1.02
"Before investing resources into the development of a precision dosing (model-informed precision dosing [MIPD]) tool for tacrolimus, the performance of the tool was evaluated in silico."( Predicting model-informed precision dosing: A test-case in tacrolimus dose adaptation for kidney transplant recipients.
Annaert, P; Bouillon, T; Faelens, R; Kuypers, D; Luyckx, N, 2022
)
1.17
" The CNI dosage of tacrolimus group and cyclosporine A group was compared before and after MMF."( Effect of MMF Immunosuppression Based on CNI Reduction on CNI-Related Renal Damage after Lung Transplantation.
Tang, C; Wang, W; Xue, Y; Yang, J, 2022
)
1.05
" Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is routinely used for dosage adjustment of several immunosuppressive drugs."( Personalized immunosuppression after kidney transplantation.
Cheung, CY; Tang, SCW, 2022
)
0.72
" Our results show the clinically significant interaction between NR and immunosuppressive agents can be reasonably managed with a standardized dosing protocol."( Early clinical experience with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for the treatment of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients.
Brown, RS; Chen, JK; Hedvat, J; Jennings, DL; Kovac, DB; Lange, NW; Pereira, MR; Salerno, DM; Scheffert, J; Shertel, T, 2022
)
0.72
"Once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (TACER) is commonly administered following kidney transplantation (KTx); however, its optimal dosage remains unknown."( Two-year outcomes of low-exposure extended-release tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil regimen in de novo kidney transplantation: A multi-center randomized controlled trial.
Futamura, K; Goto, N; Hidaka, Y; Hiramitsu, T; Kawabata, C; Kinoshita, K; Kobayashi, T; Miyata, A; Narumi, S; Okada, M; Tanaka, K; Tomosugi, T; Toyoda, M; Tsujita, M; Watarai, Y; Yamanaga, S; Yokomizo, H, 2022
)
1.27
" In contrast, the dosage and eAUC of MMF did not differ between groups."( Two-year outcomes of low-exposure extended-release tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil regimen in de novo kidney transplantation: A multi-center randomized controlled trial.
Futamura, K; Goto, N; Hidaka, Y; Hiramitsu, T; Kawabata, C; Kinoshita, K; Kobayashi, T; Miyata, A; Narumi, S; Okada, M; Tanaka, K; Tomosugi, T; Toyoda, M; Tsujita, M; Watarai, Y; Yamanaga, S; Yokomizo, H, 2022
)
0.97
"Initial algorithm-based dosing appears to be effective in predicting tacrolimus dose requirement."( Model-Based Tacrolimus Follow-up Dosing in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients: A Simulation Trial.
Andrews, LM; de Winter, BCM; Francke, MI; Hesselink, DA; Keizer, RJ; van Gelder, T, 2022
)
1.33
" For every measured tacrolimus predose concentration (C 0,obs ), model-based dosing advice was simulated using the InsightRX software."( Model-Based Tacrolimus Follow-up Dosing in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients: A Simulation Trial.
Andrews, LM; de Winter, BCM; Francke, MI; Hesselink, DA; Keizer, RJ; van Gelder, T, 2022
)
1.42
"The combination of an algorithm-based tacrolimus starting dose with model-based follow-up dosing has the potential to minimize under- and overexposure to tacrolimus in the early posttransplant phase, although the additional effect of model-based follow-up dosing on initial algorithm-based dosing seems small."( Model-Based Tacrolimus Follow-up Dosing in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients: A Simulation Trial.
Andrews, LM; de Winter, BCM; Francke, MI; Hesselink, DA; Keizer, RJ; van Gelder, T, 2022
)
1.37
"This study aimed to establish a population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus coadministration with Wuzhi capsule and optimise the dosage regimen in adult liver transplant patients."( Population pharmacokinetics and dosage optimisation of tacrolimus coadministration with Wuzhi capsule in adult liver transplant patients.
Du, Y; Ge, W; Song, W; Xiong, X; Zhu, H, 2022
)
1.2
"The findings of this study have identified the various important factors to adjust tacrolimus dosage when co-administrated with voriconazole in individual patients."( The importance of CYP2C19 genotype in tacrolimus dose optimization when concomitant with voriconazole in heart transplant recipients.
Huang, X; Huang, Y; Liu, L; Mei, H; Tong, L; Xiang, H; Zeng, F; Zhang, J; Zhang, Y; Zhou, H; Zhou, Y, 2022
)
1.22
"A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model may be used to improve tacrolimus dosing and minimize under- and overexposure in kidney transplant recipients."( Body composition is associated with tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients.
de Mik-van Egmond, AME; De Winter, BCM; Francke, MI; Hesselink, DA; Severs, D; Visser, WJ, 2022
)
1.23
"The generalizability of numerous tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models constructed to promote optimal tacrolimus dosing in patients with primary nephrotic syndrome (PNS) is unclear."( Population Pharmacokinetic Evaluation with External Validation of Tacrolimus in Chinese Primary Nephrotic Syndrome Patients.
Huang, Z; Pei, Q; Yang, L; Yang, N; Yi, B, 2022
)
1.24
" Dosage modifications were not allowed."( Activity and safety of topical pimecrolimus in patients with early stage mycosis fungoides (PimTo-MF): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial.
de la Cámara, AG; de la Cruz, J; Estrach, T; Fernández-de-Misa, R; Gallardo, F; García-Díaz, N; Jiménez, B; Lora, D; Maroñas Jiménez, L; Muniesa, C; Ortiz-Romero, PL; Pedro Vaqué, J; Piris Pinilla, MÁ; Postigo, C; Riveiro-Falkenbach, E; Rodríguez Peralto, JL; Sánchez-Beato, M; Sanmartín, O; Servitje, O; Vega, R, 2022
)
0.72
"This study developed tacrolimus dose regimens for the first time for paediatric lung transplant recipients using Monte Carlo simulation and optimized initial dosage in paediatric lung transplant recipients."( Optimization of initial dose regimen of tacrolimus in paediatric lung transplant recipients based on Monte Carlo simulation.
Ding, KW; He, SM; Mei, YQ; Wang, DD; Wang, X; Wei, QL; Xue, JJ; Yang, L, 2022
)
1.31
" This means that Bayesian dosing tools developed to optimise tacrolimus and MPA dosing in Caucasian recipients may be applied to Aboriginal recipients."( Important lack of difference in tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics between Aboriginal and Caucasian kidney transplant recipients.
Barraclough, KA; Carroll, R; Cherian, S; Gorham, G; Holford, N; Majoni, SW; Metz, D; Staatz, CE; Swaminathan, R, 2022
)
1.25
"The dosing regimen of FK506 that restored bone healing increased the bioburden in the bone and on the fixation implant compared to the carrier control animals."( FK506 increases susceptibility to musculoskeletal infection in a rodent model.
Muire, PJ; Shiels, SM; Wenke, JC, 2022
)
0.72
"The management of immunosuppressors in solid organ transplantation requires pharmacological therapeutic monitoring with regular adaptation of the dosage to the residual level."( Sotorasib associated with tacrolimus and everolimus: A significant drug interaction in lung transplant patients.
Bedouch, P; Briault, A; Degano, B; Falque, L; Liaigre, L; Orhon, P; Perrier, Q; Raymond, CS; Romand, P, 2022
)
1.02
" They were killed on the 14th PO and the kidney was removed for tissue oxidative stress analysis, by the dosage of reduced glutathione (GSH), lipoperoxidation (LPO) and protein carbonylation (PCO), and histological analysis by glomerular stereology (Glomerular volume density, Numerical density glomerular and mean glomerular volume)."( Evaluation of nefrotoxicity by tacrolimus and micophenolate mofetil associated with kidney ischemia and reperfusion: experimental study in rats.
Cavalli, AC; Fraga, R; Sala, LFM; Slongo, J; Tambara Filho, R, 2022
)
1.01
"The effects of multidrug resistance-1 (MDR1), ABCC2, and P450 oxidoreductase (POR)*28 gene polymorphisms on tacrolimus metabolism following a switch to once-daily dosing have not been elucidated."( Impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in liver transplant patients after switching to once-daily dosing.
Choi, Y; Hong, SK; Hong, SY; Lee, JM; Lee, KW; Oh, SC; Park, J; Park, MY; Suh, KS; Yi, NJ, 2023
)
1.38
"Eighty-seven liver transplant recipients who were switched from twice- to once-daily tacrolimus dosing following living-donor liver transplantation and 81 matched donors were genotyped for CYP3A5, MDR1 (1236C>T, 2677G>T/A, and 3435C>T), ABCC2 (-24C>T, 1249G>A, and 3972C>T), and POR*28."( Impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in liver transplant patients after switching to once-daily dosing.
Choi, Y; Hong, SK; Hong, SY; Lee, JM; Lee, KW; Oh, SC; Park, J; Park, MY; Suh, KS; Yi, NJ, 2023
)
1.39
" Dose adjustment to maintain therapeutic tacrolimus levels following the switch to once-daily dosing should be considered based on polymorphisms in both the recipient and donor."( Impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in liver transplant patients after switching to once-daily dosing.
Choi, Y; Hong, SK; Hong, SY; Lee, JM; Lee, KW; Oh, SC; Park, J; Park, MY; Suh, KS; Yi, NJ, 2023
)
1.44
"The objective of this study was to assess the effect of the very low dosage of diltiazem on tacrolimus exposure during the first week post-kidney transplantation, among cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 expressers who did not receive diltiazem (EXplb), CYP3A5 expressers who received the very low dose diltiazem (EXdtz), CYP3A5 nonexpressers who did not receive diltiazem (NEplb), and CYP3A5 nonexpressers who received the very low dose diltiazem (NEdtz)."( The effect of the very low dosage diltiazem on tacrolimus exposure very early after kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial.
Kunlamas, Y; Susomboon, T; Vadcharavivad, S; Vongwiwatana, A, 2022
)
1.2
" The median survival time was >176 days over the dosing period and 45 days after drug withdrawal."( Impacts of dosing and drug withdrawal period on tacrolimus-based triple therapy in a non-human primate renal transplantation model.
Fukahori, H; Hanaoka, K; Higashi, Y; Koyama, H; Maeda, M; Morokata, T; Murakami, R; Naganuma, Y; Nakamura, K; Satake, H, 2022
)
0.98
" Compared with the control group, the tacrolimus group had a lower cumulative steroid dosage and earlier discontinuation of steroids (p < 0."( Efficacy and steroid-sparing effect of tacrolimus in patients with autoimmune cytopenia.
Chen, M; Han, B; Yang, C; Zhang, R, 2022
)
1.26
" The dosage of pyridostigmine bromide was reduced for 69."( Effect of treatment with Fufang Huangqi decoction on dose reductions and discontinuation of pyridostigmine bromide tablets, prednisone, and tacrolimus in patients with type I or II myasthenia gravis.
Caifeng, S; Haiou, P; Jingsheng, Z; Wenjun, Q; Xueshi, H; Yi, L; Zhanyou, W, 2022
)
0.92
" Immunobiogram dose-response curve parameters were compared between both subgroups in patients treated with mycophenolate, tacrolimus, corticosteroids, cyclosporine A or everolimus."( The Immunobiogram, a novel in vitro diagnostic test to measure the pharmacodynamic response to immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant patients.
Andrés, A; Crespo, M; Díez, T; Jiménez, C; Kotton, CN; Krajewska, M; Ortega, A; Pascual, J; Paz-Artal, E; Portero, I; Portolés, J; Seron, D; Sorensen, SS; Witzke, O, 2022
)
0.93
"The study aimed to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model of tacrolimus for Chinese patients with nephrotic syndrome using the patient's genotype and Wuzhi capsule dosage as the main test factors."( Tacrolimus Population Pharmacokinetic Model in Adult Chinese Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome and Dosing Regimen Identification Using Monte Carlo Simulations.
Liao, M; Wang, M; Zhao, L; Zhao, M; Zhu, X, 2022
)
2.4
" Once the model is externally validated, the effect of post-transplant time on clearance and the sedation status may be considered in routine dosing management."( Population pharmacokinetics of sublingually administered tacrolimus in infants and young children with liver transplantation.
Buamscha, D; Cáceres Guido, P; Cruz, A; Dip, M; Galván, ME; Halac, E; Ibarra, M; Imventarza, O; Licciardone, N; Lopez, C; Parra-Guillen, ZP; Pérez, E; Riva, N; Schaiquevich, P; Trezeguet Renatti, G; Troconiz, IF, 2023
)
1.16
"No statistically significant differences were found among treatments regarding dosage used, levels, creatinine, and proteinuria (P > ."( Comparative Study of 2 Extended-Release Tacrolimus Formulations in Kidney Transplantation.
Beneyto Castelló, I; Cholbi Vives, E; Cruz Sánchez, A; Espí Reig, J; González-Calero Borrás, P; Hernández Jaras, J; Moreno Maestre, E; Ramos Cebrián, M; Ramos Escorihuela, D; Ventura Galiano, A, 2022
)
0.99
" We describe a new living donor kidney recipient receiving pretransplant and post-transplant immunosuppressants including oral mycophenolate (MMF 1 g daily) and tacrolimus (FK-506 4-8 mg daily) who developed progressive liver dysfunction (up to 10-fold increase) despite the reduced FK-506 dosage (6 mg daily)."( Mycophenolate-Induced Hepatotoxicity Precipitates Tacrolimus Nephrotoxicity in a Kidney Transplant Recipient: A Case Report.
Chang, WC; Chen, CC; Lin, SH, 2022
)
1.17
" However, optimal dosing is challenging due to its narrow therapeutic index, potentially serious adverse effects, and wide inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetics."( Influence of CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3 combined genotypes on tacrolimus dose requirements in Egyptian renal transplant patients.
Ebid, AIM; ELSharkawy, M; Ismail, DA; Lotfy, NM; Mahmoud, MA, 2022
)
0.97
" Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to develop the population pharmacokinetics model for tacrolimus in patients with heart transplants, followed by Monte Carlo simulations to design initial dosing regimens."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis for Model-Based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus in Chinese Han Heart Transplant Patients.
Chen, J; Cheng, Y; Lin, X; Qiu, H; Zhang, J, 2023
)
1.35
"The population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus in heart transplant patients can better estimate the population and individual pharmacokinetic parameters of patients and can provide a reference for the design of individualized dosing regimens."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis for Model-Based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus in Chinese Han Heart Transplant Patients.
Chen, J; Cheng, Y; Lin, X; Qiu, H; Zhang, J, 2023
)
1.4
" Topical steroids in slow tapering dosage were preferred by 86."( Practice patterns and opinions in the treatment of allergic eye disease: A survey among Indian ophthalmologists.
Das, S; Priyadarshini, SR, 2023
)
0.91
" Tacrolimus dosage and blood level, liver and renal function, lipid and glucose profiles were recorded."( Renal Function, Adherence and Quality of Life Improvement After Conversion From Immediate to Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in Liver Transplantation: Prospective Ten-Year Follow-Up Study.
Baiocchi, L; Blasi, F; Lenci, I; Manzia, TM; Tisone, G; Toschi, N; Toti, L, 2022
)
1.84
"Weight-based tacrolimus dosing appears to underestimate the tacrolimus dose requirements."( Predictive Capacity of Population Pharmacokinetic Models for the Tacrolimus Dose Requirements of Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.
Pai, MP; Park, JM; Pasternak, AL, 2023
)
1.52
"Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant widely used in transplantations requiring mandatory concentration-controlled dosing to prevent acute rejection or adverse effects, including new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM)."( Longitudinal Exposure to Tacrolimus and New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Renal Transplant Patients.
Destere, A; Marquet, P; Monchaud, C; Premaud, A; Woillard, JB, 2023
)
2.66
" The objective of our study was to establish a population pharmacokinetics (PK) model of apatinib in adult cancer patients, and to explore optimal dosage regimens for individualized treatment."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of apatinib in adult cancer patients.
Chen, KG; Guo, ZX; Kan, M; Li, Q; Li, Y; Liu, HY; Liu, XL; Shi, JY; Song, LL; van den Anker, J; Yang, XM; Ye, PP; Zhang, YH; Zhao, FR; Zhao, W, 2023
)
0.91
" The dosing regimen was optimized based on Monte Carlo simulations."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of apatinib in adult cancer patients.
Chen, KG; Guo, ZX; Kan, M; Li, Q; Li, Y; Liu, HY; Liu, XL; Shi, JY; Song, LL; van den Anker, J; Yang, XM; Ye, PP; Zhang, YH; Zhao, FR; Zhao, W, 2023
)
0.91
"A retrospective chart review was conducted to gather dosing data and tacrolimus concentrations, as part of a clinical pharmacology consultation service."( Model-Informed Estimation of Acutely Decreased Tacrolimus Clearance and Subsequent Dose Individualization in a Pediatric Renal Transplant Patient With Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome.
Hooper, DK; Lazear, D; Miyagawa, B; Mizuno, T; Vinks, AA, 2023
)
1.4
"Envarsus XR® (LCPT), a once daily dosage formulation of tacrolimus, is an FDA-approved medication in adult renal transplant recipients (RTRs)."( Envarsus XR® pharmacokinetics in adolescents post-kidney transplantation - A pilot study.
Chen, L; ElChaki, R; Ettenger, R; Gales, B; Lee, S; Pearl, M; Srivastava, R, 2023
)
1.16
"We observed that various MLAs could identify significant predictors that were useful to optimize tacrolimus and cyclosporine dosing regimens; yet, the findings must be externally validated."( Developing supervised machine learning algorithms to evaluate the therapeutic effect and laboratory-related adverse events of cyclosporine and tacrolimus in renal transplants.
Shah, S; Sridharan, K, 2023
)
1.33
" The goal of this study was to assess the influence of CYP3A5 on perioperative LCP tac dosing and monitoring."( Impact of CYP3A5 genotype on de-novo LCP tacrolimus dosing and monitoring in kidney transplantation.
Bartlett, F; Carcella, T; Casey, M; Dubay, DA; Patel, N; Posadas, MA; Rao, N; Taber, DJ, 2023
)
1.18
" In sequential modeling, CYP3A5 genotype status explained the LCP tac dosing requirements significantly more than AA race."( Impact of CYP3A5 genotype on de-novo LCP tacrolimus dosing and monitoring in kidney transplantation.
Bartlett, F; Carcella, T; Casey, M; Dubay, DA; Patel, N; Posadas, MA; Rao, N; Taber, DJ, 2023
)
1.18
" When possible, lower dosing within 1 year after LT can reduce potential nephrotoxic side effects."( The impact of long-term exposure to tacrolimus on chronic kidney disease after lung transplantation: A retrospective analysis from a single transplantation center.
Ban, L; Chen, J; Chen, Y; Lv, J; Wang, H; Xiong, D; Ye, S; Yin, P; Yue, B; Zhou, M, 2023
)
1.19
"Genotype-based dosing of tacrolimus helps achieve the desired therapeutic concentrations that can help to optimize graft outcomes and reduce the tacrolimus-related adverse effects."( CYP3A5 Polymorphism in Renal Transplantation: A Key to Personalized Immunosuppression.
Balwani, MR; Bawankule, C; Bhawane, A; Dubey, S; Gurjar, P; Kashiv, P; Katekhaye, VM; Pasari, AS; Tolani, P, 2023
)
1.21
" The challenge of tacrolimus dosing is magnified in the African American population."( Implementation of Clinical Cytochrome P450 3A Genotyping for Tacrolimus Dosing in a Large Kidney Transplant Program.
Chen, J; Eadon, MT; Maddatu, JP; Nikirk, MG; Sharfuddin, AA; Shugg, T; Skaar, TC; Tillman, E, 2023
)
1.49
" The population PK/PD model quantitatively described the relationships among tacrolimus dose, exposure, and therapeutic efficacy in patients with MG, which could provide reference for the optimization of tacrolimus dosing regimen at the individual patient level."( Population PK/PD model of tacrolimus for exploring the relationship between accumulated exposure and quantitative scores in myasthenia gravis patients.
Chen, D; Chen, W; Hou, S; Jin, P; Tian, X; Yang, L; Yao, Q; Yin, J; Zhang, H; Zhao, M; Zhou, T, 2023
)
1.44
" Therefore, optimization of tacrolimus dosing is urgently needed in transplant recipients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment."( Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment in SARS-CoV-2 positive kidney transplant recipients - a case series with four patients.
Kühn, W; Schneider, J; Tanriver, Y; Wagner, D; Walz, G; Wobser, R, 2023
)
1.2
" As dosing non-compliance can result in graft rejection, the once daily formulation of tacrolimus, Advagraf™, was developed (vs 2x/day Prograf®)."( EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients.
Baccar, S; Brennfleck, F; Brunner, SM; Geissler, EK; Götz, M; Holub-Hayles, I; James, B; Mutzbauer, I; Schlitt, HJ; Wöhl, DS, 2023
)
1.13
"Heart transplant recipients experience high rates of skin cancer, likely due to greater length or dosage of immunosuppression."( A review of heart transplant immunosuppressants and nonmelanoma skin cancer.
Camacho, I; Dave, Y; Eckembrecher, DG; Eckembrecher, FJ; Nouri, K; Patel, S; Shah, H, 2023
)
0.91
" In the RTX group, RTX was given at the same dosage as the RTX + TAC group."( Combination of Rituximab and Low-dose Tacrolimus in the Treatment of Refractory Membranous Nephropathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Chen, X; Jiao, S; Li, J; Li, P; Li, S; Song, F; Yan, Z, 2023
)
1.18
"The optimal TAC dosage should be adjusted based on the patient's co-administration, body weight, and genetic information (especially CYP3A5 genotype)."( Population pharmacokinetic analyses of tacrolimus in non-transplant patients: a systematic review.
Wang, CB; Zhang, YJ; Zhao, LM; Zhao, MM, 2023
)
1.18
"Historically, dosing of tacrolimus is guided by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the whole blood concentration, which is strongly influenced by haematocrit."( A Joint Pharmacokinetic Model for the Simultaneous Description of Plasma and Whole Blood Tacrolimus Concentrations in Kidney and Lung Transplant Recipients.
Bakker, SJL; Colin, PJ; Gan, CT; Knobbe, TJ; Koomen, JV; Kremer, D; Touw, DJ; Verschuuren, EAM; Zijp, TR, 2023
)
1.44
" Personalized tacrolimus dosing may improve transplant outcomes by more efficiently achieving and maintaining therapeutic tacrolimus concentrations."( External assessment and refinement of a population pharmacokinetic model to guide tacrolimus dosing in pediatric heart transplant.
Cabrera, AG; Daly, KP; Hong, B; Hope, KD; McKnite, A; Molina, KM; Rower, JE, 2023
)
1.5
"These findings support the potential clinical utility of a population PK model to provide personalized tacrolimus dosing guidance."( External assessment and refinement of a population pharmacokinetic model to guide tacrolimus dosing in pediatric heart transplant.
Cabrera, AG; Daly, KP; Hong, B; Hope, KD; McKnite, A; Molina, KM; Rower, JE, 2023
)
1.35
" Trough concentration monitoring and dosing adjustments are used to reach a therapeutic range."( Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics are influenced by CYP3A5, age, and concomitant fluconazole in pediatric kidney transplant patients.
Alghamdi, A; Darland, L; Hooper, DK; Lazear, D; Mizuno, T; Ramsey, LB; Seay, S; Varnell, CD, 2023
)
2.35
" Secondary endpoints included the incidence of IS levels outside of the therapeutic range (subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic) and mean dosage changes over time."( Belumosudil Impacts Immunosuppression Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.
Faramand, R; Gaskill, E; Gonzalez, R; Khimani, F; Lazaryan, A; Padilla, M; Perez, L; Pidala, J, 2023
)
0.91
" Tacrolimus concentrations should be closely monitored, and dosing adjusted during and after flucloxacillin administration."( It cuts both ways: A single-center retrospective review describing a three-way interaction between flucloxacillin, voriconazole and tacrolimus.
Burrows, FS; Carlos, LM; Marriott, DJE; Stojanova, J, 2023
)
2.02
" Thus, PPK-based Tac dosing offers significant superiority for starting Tac prescription over classical labeling-based dosing according to the body weight, which may optimize Tac-based therapy in the first days following transplantation."( A prospective controlled, randomized clinical trial of kidney transplant recipients developed personalized tacrolimus dosing using model-based Bayesian Prediction.
Bestard, O; Colom, H; Coloma, A; Cruzado, JM; Favà, A; Fontova, P; Grinyó, JM; Lloberas, N; Manonelles, A; Melilli, E; Meneghini, M; Montero, N; Padró, A; Rigo-Bonnin, R; Torras, J; Vidal-Alabró, A, 2023
)
1.12
" More broadly, considering the high number of drugs with unexplained PK variability transported by ABCB1, our work is of clinical importance and paves the way for incorporating the gut microbiota in prediction algorithms for dosage of such drugs."( Gut microbiome modulates tacrolimus pharmacokinetics through the transcriptional regulation of ABCB1.
Andries, V; Bindels, LB; Degraeve, AL; Elens, L; Gatto, L; Haufroid, V; Loriot, A; Vereecke, L, 2023
)
1.21
" LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT-Envarsus XR) was approved in 2018 for use as a de novo immunosuppressive agent in kidney transplants, but there is limited evidence to guide de novo dosing of LCPT in patients with obesity."( Retrospective evaluation of LCP-tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) dosing in de novo kidney transplant.
Alzahrani, M; Belcher, RM; Benken, J; Benken, ST; Di Cocco, P; Kajavathanan, M; Valdepenas, B, 2023
)
1.71
"There was a statistically significant, though modest, correlation between all three dosing strategies and the first tacrolimus trough level (TBW correlation coefficient = ."( Retrospective evaluation of LCP-tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) dosing in de novo kidney transplant.
Alzahrani, M; Belcher, RM; Benken, J; Benken, ST; Di Cocco, P; Kajavathanan, M; Valdepenas, B, 2023
)
1.4
"The use of LCPT in kidney transplant recipients with obesity dosed using TBW demonstrated the strongest correlation with initial supratherapeutic tacrolimus levels."( Retrospective evaluation of LCP-tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) dosing in de novo kidney transplant.
Alzahrani, M; Belcher, RM; Benken, J; Benken, ST; Di Cocco, P; Kajavathanan, M; Valdepenas, B, 2023
)
1.39
" We planned an exploratory clinical trial to determine the efficacy, safety, and dosage of tacrolimus in women with intractable infertility."( Multicenter, 2-dose single-group controlled trial of tacrolimus for the severe infertility patients.
Hirota, Y; Hisano, M; Inoue, E; Kikuchi, K; Nakagawa, K; Nakamura, H; Ono, M; Saito, T; Yamaguchi, K; Yoshino, O, 2023
)
1.38
" We ascertained whether the risk of drug-induced tremor is influenced by the underlying diagnosis, dosing formulations, drug concentrations, and blood monitoring."( Tremor Induced by Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, or Everolimus: A Review of the Literature.
Jha, N; Joyce, M; Khalid, U; Lunny, C; Mahboob, O; Nagaraja, N; Shukla, AM; Wagle Shukla, A, 2023
)
1.19
" Therefore, dosing algorithms have been developed to limit the time a patient is exposed to off-target concentrations."( Individualized dosing algorithms for tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: current status and unmet needs.
de Winter, BCM; Francke, MI; Hesselink, DA; Reinders, MEJ; Sassen, SDT; Schagen, MR; Volarevic, H,
)
0.4
" provide further evidence for the benefits of an individualized tacrolimus dosing algorithm based on population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics."( A first small step toward personalized immunosuppression.
Budde, K; Rostaing, L, 2023
)
1.15
" This study and future multicenter studies can contribute to the individualization of TAC dosing in Egyptian patients."( The impact of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genetic variations on tacrolimus treatment of living-donor Egyptian kidney transplanted patients.
Abdelfattah, ME; Elbadawy, HM; Fayad, T; Kamel, MH; Mikhael, ES; Wanas, H; William, EA, 2023
)
1.16
" However, it is not clear whether long-term maintenance therapy with reduced-calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) dosing still leads to reduced renal function."( Long-term effects of average calcineurin inhibitor trough levels (over time) on renal function in a prospectively followed cohort of 150 kidney transplant recipients.
Burke, GW; Ciancio, G; Gaynor, JJ; Guerra, G; Kupin, W; Mattiazzi, A; Moni, L; Roth, D; Tabbara, MM, 2023
)
0.91
"Time release pellets were used to deliver constant FK506 dosage to APP/PS1 mice without deleterious manipulation or handling."( Long-term normalization of calcineurin activity in model mice rescues Pin1 and attenuates Alzheimer's phenotypes without blocking peripheral T cell IL-2 response.
Hu, J; Malter, JS; O'Neal, MA; Shen, ZJ; Stallings, NR, 2023
)
0.91
"For children with OMG, the addition of various immunosuppressants can reduce the dosage of GC and adverse reactions."( [Clinical effect of different immunosuppressive treatment regimens in children with ocular myasthenia gravis: a retrospective analysis].
Chen, H; Chen, Y; Huang, ZX; Wang, RY; Zhong, JM, 2023
)
0.91
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (2)

RoleDescription
immunosuppressive agentAn agent that suppresses immune function by one of several mechanisms of action. Classical cytotoxic immunosuppressants act by inhibiting DNA synthesis. Others may act through activation of T-cells or by inhibiting the activation of helper cells. In addition, an immunosuppressive agent is a role played by a compound which is exhibited by a capability to diminish the extent and/or voracity of an immune response.
bacterial metaboliteAny prokaryotic metabolite produced during a metabolic reaction in bacteria.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (1)

ClassDescription
macrolide lactamA macrolide in which the macrocyclic lactone ring includes an amide group.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (3)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
T Cell Receptor Signaling Pathway477
7q11.23 copy number variation syndrome213
Drug induction of bile acid pathway025

Protein Targets (34)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, Ferritin light chainEquus caballus (horse)Potency23.73595.623417.292931.6228AID485281
USP1 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency39.81070.031637.5844354.8130AID504865
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency3.16770.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency16.93010.000221.22318,912.5098AID743035; AID743063
glucocorticoid receptor [Homo sapiens]Homo sapiens (human)Potency10.68220.000214.376460.0339AID720692
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency12.91200.000229.305416,493.5996AID743069; AID743075; AID743078
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)Potency10.28000.001019.414170.9645AID743140
cytochrome P450, family 19, subfamily A, polypeptide 1, isoform CRA_aHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.26600.001723.839378.1014AID743083
thyroid hormone receptor beta isoform 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency0.00190.000323.4451159.6830AID743065
nuclear receptor ROR-gamma isoform 1Mus musculus (house mouse)Potency11.22020.00798.23321,122.0200AID2551
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency18.83750.004611.374133.4983AID624297
DNA polymerase kappa isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency15.00300.031622.3146100.0000AID588579
peripheral myelin protein 22Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency0.36130.005612.367736.1254AID624032
Cellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)Potency37.57800.002319.595674.0614AID651631
Spike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusPotency11.22020.009610.525035.4813AID1479145
ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)Potency16.78550.011917.942071.5630AID651632
Ataxin-2Homo sapiens (human)Potency16.78550.011912.222168.7989AID651632
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)7.18000.11007.190310.0000AID1473738
Cytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.58000.00011.753610.0000AID1209600; AID1209601; AID625251
Cytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.38500.00330.70736.2000AID1209594; AID1209595
Serine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00210.00000.857510.0000AID240685; AID69259
Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)7.86180.00040.39373.6000AID1450257; AID1730844; AID69106; AID69107; AID69122
Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.00040.00000.88375.4000AID69108
Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01480.01480.09890.1830AID45444
Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.07950.00300.05400.0800AID1293681; AID740342
Splicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01230.01090.93893.4810AID506784; AID507021
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)40.30002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
Broad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)3.30000.00401.966610.0000AID1873213
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)3.70000.05002.37979.7000AID678796
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)5.00000.00203.519610.0000AID1215094
Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.00090.00090.44812.2000AID69104
Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)Kd0.00040.00020.00030.0004AID1179559
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A4Homo sapiens (human)Km120.00007.00007.00007.0000AID1217116; AID1217132
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (386)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular receptor signaling pathwayNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell differentiationNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ER overload responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
somitogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferation involved in immune responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
B cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleotide-excision repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein import into nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrestCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
Ras protein signal transductionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
gastrulationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein localizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA replicationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
determination of adult lifespanCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
rRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to salt stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to X-rayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
viral processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic G1 DNA damage checkpoint signalingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of telomere maintenance via telomeraseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of tissue remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UVCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial DNA repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription initiation-coupled chromatin remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to antibioticCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
circadian behaviorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
bone marrow developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic organ developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein stabilizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of helicase activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein tetramerizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome organizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
type II interferon-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac septum morphogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of programmed necrotic cell deathCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
necroptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ionizing radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-CCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to actinomycin DCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replicative senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative stress-induced premature senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of execution phase of apoptosisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability involved in apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G1 to G0 transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA processingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of pentose-phosphate shuntCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of fibroblast apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
lipid hydroxylationCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
lipid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
cholesterol metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
androgen metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
alkaloid catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
monoterpenoid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
calcitriol biosynthetic process from calciolCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinol metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid biosynthetic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
aflatoxin metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative demethylationCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
lipid metabolic processUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
androgen metabolic processUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
cellular glucuronidationUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
lipid hydroxylationCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
alkaloid catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
retinol metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
aflatoxin metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative demethylationCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin conjugationUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A4Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A4Homo sapiens (human)
cellular glucuronidationUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D3 metabolic processUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A4Homo sapiens (human)
protein destabilizationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
protein phosphorylationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of macroautophagySerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
phosphorylationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
protein autophosphorylationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell growthSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
T-helper 1 cell lineage commitmentSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
heart morphogenesisSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
heart valve morphogenesisSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
energy reserve metabolic processSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
'de novo' pyrimidine nucleobase biosynthetic processSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
protein phosphorylationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cytoskeleton organizationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
lysosome organizationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
germ cell developmentSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
response to nutrientSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell sizeSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to starvationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
response to heatSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
post-embryonic developmentSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of autophagySerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of lamellipodium assemblySerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epithelial to mesenchymal transitionSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of myotube differentiationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
macroautophagySerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of macroautophagySerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
phosphorylationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-serine phosphorylationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal action potentialSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
protein catabolic processSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell growthSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of actin filament polymerizationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
T cell costimulationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
ruffle organizationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of myelinationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
response to nutrient levelsSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to nutrient levelsSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to nutrientSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
TOR signalingSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphoprotein phosphatase activitySerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to insulin stimulusSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of actin cytoskeleton organizationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
calcineurin-NFAT signaling cascadeSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to amino acid starvationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
TORC1 signalingSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of circadian rhythmSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
response to amino acidSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
anoikisSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of osteoclast differentiationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of translationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell sizeSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of glycolytic processSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIISerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of translational initiationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of lipid biosynthetic processSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to painSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
rhythmic processSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte differentiationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of oligodendrocyte differentiationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
voluntary musculoskeletal movementSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of stress fiber assemblySerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of keratinocyte migrationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
nucleus localizationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transductionSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell developmentSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle contractionSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to methionineSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of calcineurin-NFAT signaling cascadeSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to amino acid stimulusSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to L-leucineSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to osmotic stressSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane permeabilitySerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cellular response to heatSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein localization to nucleusSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of signal transduction by p53 class mediatorSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription of nucleolar large rRNA by RNA polymerase ISerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of wound healing, spreading of epidermal cellsSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of locomotor rhythmSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytoplasmic translational initiationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of lysosome organizationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of pentose-phosphate shuntSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to leucine starvationSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of autophagosome assemblySerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of macroautophagySerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
protein peptidyl-prolyl isomerizationPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
heart morphogenesisPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
protein foldingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
'de novo' protein foldingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of skeletal muscle contraction by regulation of release of sequestered calcium ionPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
protein maturation by protein foldingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein localizationPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of activin receptor signaling pathwayPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
protein refoldingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activationPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of immune responsePeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle tissue morphogenesisPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of ryanodine-sensitive calcium-release channel activityPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
heart trabecula formationPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
supramolecular fiber organizationPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of amyloid precursor protein catabolic processPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
amyloid fibril formationPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
'de novo' protein foldingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
smooth muscle contractionPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of heart ratePeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosol by sarcoplasmic reticulumPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cardiac muscle contraction by regulation of the release of sequestered calcium ionPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal action potential propagationPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
calcium-mediated signalingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
protein maturation by protein foldingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
response to vitamin EPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
insulin secretion involved in cellular response to glucose stimulusPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
protein refoldingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferationPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
response to hydrogen peroxidePeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of axon regenerationPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of calcium-mediated signalingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosolPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosolPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of sequestering of calcium ionPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
response to redox statePeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of insulin secretion involved in cellular response to glucose stimulusPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
protein peptidyl-prolyl isomerizationPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
G1/S transition of mitotic cell cycleSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
response to amphetamineSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
protein dephosphorylationSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
protein import into nucleusSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transportSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
epidermis developmentSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
transition between fast and slow fiberSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle hypertrophy in response to stressSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
dephosphorylationSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of signalingSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
keratinocyte differentiationSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell migrationSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
calcineurin-NFAT signaling cascadeSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
multicellular organismal response to stressSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
wound healingSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of activated T cell proliferationSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activationSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
skeletal muscle tissue regenerationSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of osteoblast differentiationSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of osteoclast differentiationSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell adhesionSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of endocytosisSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IISerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of insulin secretionSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of saliva secretionSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
skeletal muscle fiber developmentSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
dendrite morphogenesisSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of dendrite morphogenesisSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
modulation of chemical synaptic transmissionSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
response to calcium ionSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
excitatory postsynaptic potentialSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell proliferation involved in kidney morphogenesisSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-serine dephosphorylationSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of calcineurin-NFAT signaling cascadeSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose stimulusSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of glomerulus developmentSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
renal filtrationSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
calcineurin-mediated signalingSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic modulation of chemical synaptic transmissionSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of angiotensin-activated signaling pathwaySerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle hypertrophy in response to stressSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of connective tissue replacementSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of calcium ion import across plasma membraneSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of calcium ion import across plasma membraneSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
protein foldingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
response to bacteriumPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
chaperone-mediated protein foldingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
protein peptidyl-prolyl isomerizationPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
RNA splicing, via transesterification reactionsSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA splicing, via spliceosomeSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA repairSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
RNA splicingSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein catabolic processSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of RNA splicingSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
U2-type prespliceosome assemblySplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell population proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of B cell proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction in response to DNA damageATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
isotype switchingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of isotype switching to IgG isotypesATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloadingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitotic cell cycle phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of receptor internalizationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of translationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA metabolic processAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
P-body assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
stress granule assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA transportAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
lipid transportBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transportBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
biotin transportBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
sphingolipid biosynthetic processBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
riboflavin transportBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
urate metabolic processBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
renal urate salt excretionBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular detoxificationBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
thyroid hormone transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (130)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
TFIID-class transcription factor complex bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
receptor tyrosine kinase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase regulator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent DNA/DNA annealing activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
MDM2/MDM4 family protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
disordered domain specific bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid 4-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
oxygen bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D3 25-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
caffeine oxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
quinine 3-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
testosterone 6-beta-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
1-alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 23-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 8,9 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 11,12 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 14,15 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
aromatase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D 24-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen 16-alpha-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen 2-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
1,8-cineole 2-exo-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid bindingUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronosyltransferase activityUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid 4-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activityCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
oxygen bindingCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
aromatase activityCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen 16-alpha-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
testosterone 6-beta-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid bindingUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A4Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronosyltransferase activityUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A4Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A4Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A4Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A4Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase III type 1 promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase III type 2 promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase III type 3 promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
TFIIIC-class transcription factor complex bindingSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase activitySerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
protein serine/threonine kinase activitySerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
kinase activitySerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
ribosome bindingSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
phosphoprotein bindingSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
protein serine kinase activitySerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activityPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
transforming growth factor beta receptor bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
macrolide bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
FK506 bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
channel regulator activityPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor inhibitor activityPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
type I transforming growth factor beta receptor bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
I-SMAD bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
activin receptor bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
ryanodine-sensitive calcium-release channel activityPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activityPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
FK506 bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
channel regulator activityPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
calcium channel inhibitor activityPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
cyclic nucleotide bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
protein serine/threonine phosphatase activitySerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion bindingSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
cyclosporin A bindingSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
myosin phosphatase activitySerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin-dependent protein phosphatase activitySerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex bindingSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
protein dimerization activitySerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
ATPase bindingSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activityPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
FK506 bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
protein-macromolecule adaptor activityPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
heat shock protein bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex bindingSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
U2 snRNA bindingSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloader activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
epidermal growth factor receptor bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
biotin transmembrane transporter activityBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
riboflavin transmembrane transporter activityBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
sphingolipid transporter activityBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
thyroid hormone transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (79)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
intermediate filament cytoskeletonNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
PML bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
site of double-strand breakCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
germ cell nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
membraneUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A4Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A4Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A4Homo sapiens (human)
PML bodySerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
lysosomal membraneSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial outer membraneSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
lysosomeSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
lysosomal membraneSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
endomembrane systemSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
membraneSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
TORC1 complexSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
TORC2 complexSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
phagocytic vesicleSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear envelopeSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmSerine/threonine-protein kinase mTORHomo sapiens (human)
virion membraneSpike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus
cytoplasmPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
terminal cisternaPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
membranePeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
sarcoplasmic reticulumPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
Z discPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic side of membranePeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
ryanodine receptor complexPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
sarcoplasmic reticulum membranePeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1AHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
membranePeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
Z discPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
sarcoplasmic reticulum membranePeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
calcium channel complexPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
sarcoplasmic reticulum membranePeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1BHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic side of plasma membraneSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
calcineurin complexSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
protein serine/threonine phosphatase complexSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
extrinsic component of plasma membraneSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
Z discSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
slit diaphragmSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
sarcolemmaSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
dendritic spineSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
Schaffer collateral - CA1 synapseSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmSerine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha isoformHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
membranePeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomePeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
SAGA complexSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
spliceosomal complexSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
U2-type spliceosomal complexSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
U2 snRNPSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
U12-type spliceosomal complexSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
U2-type precatalytic spliceosomeSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
catalytic step 2 spliceosomeSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusSplicing factor 3B subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
Elg1 RFC-like complexATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
ribonucleoprotein complexAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
brush border membraneBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial membraneBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane raftBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBroad substrate specificity ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (327)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1277551Antiinflammatory activity in ICR mouse assessed as inhibition of picryl chloride-induced contact hypersensitivity reaction administered topically on left ear after 24 hrs2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 26, Issue:4
Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel orally available 1-phenyl-6-aminouracils containing dimethyldihydrobenzofuranol structure for the treatment of allergic skin diseases.
AID425652Total body clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID1450268Cytotoxicity against human HepG2 cells2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 27, Issue:11
A calcineurin antifungal strategy with analogs of FK506.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1450272Terminal half-life in mouse at 3 mg/kg, iv2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 27, Issue:11
A calcineurin antifungal strategy with analogs of FK506.
AID177347In vivo immunosuppressive activity was evaluated by inducing arthritis in lewis rats and measuring the primary lesions after 16 days1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-14, Volume: 38, Issue:8
The C-32 triacetyl-L-rhamnose derivative of ascomycin: a potent, orally active macrolactone immunosuppressant.
AID554493Antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus H237 expressing rasA gene assessed as abnormal hyphal growth by CLSI method2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 53, Issue:2
Differential effects of inhibiting chitin and 1,3-{beta}-D-glucan synthesis in ras and calcineurin mutants of Aspergillus fumigatus.
AID724987Binding affinity to FKBP12 PPI domain (unknown origin) in water bulk solution by fluorescence spectrophotometric analysis relative to FK5062013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
The precise chemical-physical nature of the pharmacore in FK506 binding protein inhibition: ElteX, a New class of nanomolar FKBP12 ligands.
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1217128Drug metabolism in human kidney microsomes assessed as UGT2B7-mediated tacrolimus glucuronide formation at 200 uM after 16 hrs by LC-MS analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID740342Binding affinity to human FKBP51 by competitive fluorescence polarization assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-23, Volume: 56, Issue:10
Increasing the efficiency of ligands for FK506-binding protein 51 by conformational control.
AID247100Oral dose that inhibits by 50% the allergen OA-induced eosinophil influx in to the airway lumen of actively sensitized rats after -6h, +24h treatment schedule2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-23, Volume: 47, Issue:20
A locally active antiinflammatory macrolide (MLD987) for inhalation therapy of asthma.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1393127Effect on anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibody-induced cell activation in human T cells assessed as effect on CD25 expression at 0.1 uM incubated for 24 hrs by flow cytometry (Rvb = 69.1%)2017Journal of natural products, 04-28, Volume: 80, Issue:4
Monoterpenoid Indole Alkaloids from Kopsia officinalis and the Immunosuppressive Activity of Rhazinilam.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID681334TP_TRANSPORTER: transepithelial transport in Caco 2 cell2004Pharmaceutical research, May, Volume: 21, Issue:5
Predicting P-glycoprotein effects on oral absorption: correlation of transport in Caco-2 with drug pharmacokinetics in wild-type and mdr1a(-/-) mice in vivo.
AID1629466Immunomodulatory activity in ACI-to-Lewis rat heterotopic cardiac transplant model assessed as mean survival time at 0.02 mg/kg, im dosed from day of transplantation once daily for 14 consecutive days measured for 28 days2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 24, Issue:19
Design, synthesis, and evaluation of 4,6-diaminonicotinamide derivatives as novel and potent immunomodulators targeting JAK3.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID69113Inhibitory selectivity for human FK506 binding protein 12 and human mixed lymphocyte response(MLR)1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-21, Volume: 41, Issue:11
32-Ascomycinyloxyacetic acid derived immunosuppressants. Independence of immunophilin binding and immunosuppressive potency.
AID554944Inhibition of Candida krusei B2399 Abc1p assessed as reduction of itraconazole MIC at 5 ug after 48 hrs by agarose diffusion assay2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 53, Issue:2
Abc1p is a multidrug efflux transporter that tips the balance in favor of innate azole resistance in Candida krusei.
AID357932Immunosuppressant activity in mouse B cells assessed as inhibition of LPS-induced cell proliferation2001Journal of natural products, Sep, Volume: 64, Issue:9
Immunomodulatory constituents from an Ascomycete, Eupenicillium crustaceum, and revised absolute structure of macrophorin D.
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID554492Antifungal activity against rasA deficient Aspergillus fumigatus H237 assessed as abnormal hyphal growth by CLSI method2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 53, Issue:2
Differential effects of inhibiting chitin and 1,3-{beta}-D-glucan synthesis in ras and calcineurin mutants of Aspergillus fumigatus.
AID69114Immunosuppressive activity in FK506 binding protein 12 binding assay as inhibitory concentration (rIC50) relative to FK506 IC50 (1.2 nM)1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-18, Volume: 9, Issue:2
Preparation and immunosuppressive activity of 32-(O)-acylated and 32-(O)-thioacylated analogues of ascomycin.
AID1450269Cytotoxicity against African green monkey Vero 76 cells2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 27, Issue:11
A calcineurin antifungal strategy with analogs of FK506.
AID69122Binding affinity towards recombinant FK506 binding protein 12 to determine the FKBP binding property of the compound1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 24, Issue:5
New analgesic drugs derived from phencyclidine.
AID416850Antifungal activity against Trichophyton mentagrophytes DUMC160.03 by CLSI protocol2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Oct, Volume: 51, Issue:10
Targeting the calcineurin pathway enhances ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitors against Trichophyton mentagrophytes in vitro and in a human skin infection model.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID1874134Anti-angiogenesis activity against mouse 4T1 cells xenografted in BALB/c mouse at 5 mg/kg, ip measured after 15 days by anti-CD31 staining based immunohistochemistry analysis
AID1217126Drug metabolism in human intestine microsomes assessed as glucuronidation at 200 uM after 16 hrs by LC-MS analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID1221982Fraction absorbed in human2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID142575The compound was tested for its inhibitory activity against T-cell proliferation using murine splenic T-cells1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID1576824Antifungal activity against Cryptococcus neoformans H992019Journal of natural products, 08-23, Volume: 82, Issue:8
Biosynthesis of Nonimmunosuppressive FK506 Analogues with Antifungal Activity.
AID1450271Volume of distribution at steady state in mouse at 3 mg/kg, iv2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 27, Issue:11
A calcineurin antifungal strategy with analogs of FK506.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID559695Antimicrobial activity against Rhizomucor pusillus after 24 hrs by broth microdilution checkerboard procedure2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Aug, Volume: 53, Issue:8
In vitro interactions between antifungals and immunosuppressive drugs against zygomycetes.
AID1491211Anti-inflammatory activity in PMA/ionomycin stimulated human Jurkat T cells assessed as reduction in IL-2 secretion preincubated for 20 mins followed by PMA/ionomycin stimulation measured after 12 hrs by ELISA2017Journal of natural products, 05-26, Volume: 80, Issue:5
Amino Acid Conjugated Anthraquinones from the Marine-Derived Fungus Penicillium sp. SCSIO sof101.
AID186884Mean axonal area to promote nerve regeneration in rats with lesioned sciatic nerves was measured after 2 mg/kg sc daily administration.1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-17, Volume: 41, Issue:26
Immunophilins: beyond immunosuppression.
AID444058Volume of distribution at steady state in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1636489Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2C9-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 88.3 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of N2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID1450259Antagonist activity at recombinant human N-terminal His6-tagged FKBP12 expressed in Escherichia coli assessed as inhibition of FKBP12 binding to calcineurin at 5 uL using serine/threonine phosphatase as substrate pretreated for 1 hr followed by substrate 2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 27, Issue:11
A calcineurin antifungal strategy with analogs of FK506.
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID24844Off-rate of FK-506 binding protein (FKBP) drug complex from their complexes with calcineurin.1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-29, Volume: 42, Issue:15
32-Indolyl ether derivatives of ascomycin: three-dimensional structures of complexes with FK506-binding protein.
AID1576826Antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus Af2932019Journal of natural products, 08-23, Volume: 82, Issue:8
Biosynthesis of Nonimmunosuppressive FK506 Analogues with Antifungal Activity.
AID200890Exogenous inhibition concentration of Serine/threonine protein phosphatase 5 (PP5); ND means no data2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-14, Volume: 45, Issue:6
Serine-threonine protein phosphatase inhibitors: development of potential therapeutic strategies.
AID192014Effect on Axonal Regeneration following sciatic nerve neurotomy at a dose of 1 mg/kg after 10 weeks1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-09, Volume: 42, Issue:18
Synthesis and cytotoxic evaluation of cycloheximide derivatives as potential inhibitors of FKBP12 with neuroregenerative properties.
AID416849Antifungal activity against Trichophyton mentagrophytes DUMC112.02 by CLSI protocol2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Oct, Volume: 51, Issue:10
Targeting the calcineurin pathway enhances ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitors against Trichophyton mentagrophytes in vitro and in a human skin infection model.
AID132576Immunosuppressive activity was determined by ex vivo murine-based model of immunosuppression, compound was administered intravenously in mouse.1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-18, Volume: 8, Issue:16
C32-O-imidazol-2-yl-methyl ether derivatives of the immunosuppressant ascomycin with improved therapeutic potential.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID142478In vivo immunosuppression in murine models by splenic T-cell proliferation assay after intravenous administration1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID1217115Activity of UGT1A4*2 mutant (unknown origin) overexpressed in HEK293 cells assessed as intrinsic clearance for enzyme-mediated glucuronidation by measuring ratio of Vmax to Km at 25 to 750 uM after 1 hr by Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID340896Decrease in 1,3-beta-D-glucan level in Aspergillus fumigatus assessed as relative fluorescence units at 20 ng/ml by aniline blue fluorescence assay2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Aug, Volume: 51, Issue:8
Calcineurin inhibition or mutation enhances cell wall inhibitors against Aspergillus fumigatus.
AID506769Displacement of [3H]probe from SAP130 in human WiDr cells assessed as radioactive intensity at 500 nM after 1 hr by scintillation counting relative to control2007Nature chemical biology, Sep, Volume: 3, Issue:9
Splicing factor SF3b as a target of the antitumor natural product pladienolide.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID444054Oral bioavailability in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID304391Inhibition of testosterone 6-hydroxylase2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 50, Issue:26
Nuclear magnetic resonance fragment-based identification of novel FKBP12 inhibitors.
AID432790Effect on drug distribution assessed as fluconazole level in plasma of transplant patient within 7 days of testing by gas-liquid chromatography2008Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 52, Issue:2
Effect of calcineurin inhibitors on posaconazole blood levels as measured by the MVista microbiological assay.
AID200724Exogenous inhibition concentration of Serine/threonine protein phosphatase 1 (PP1); ND means no data2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-14, Volume: 45, Issue:6
Serine-threonine protein phosphatase inhibitors: development of potential therapeutic strategies.
AID681357TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Digoxin transepithelial transport (basal to apical) in Caco-2 cells1999Cancer research, Aug-15, Volume: 59, Issue:16
P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P-450 3A inhibition: dissociation of inhibitory potencies.
AID1221964Transporter substrate index ratio of permeability from basolateral to apical side in human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of P-gp inhibitor LY3359792011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID624640Drug glucuronidation reaction catalyzed by human recombinant UGT2B72005Pharmacology & therapeutics, Apr, Volume: 106, Issue:1
UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and clinical drug-drug interactions.
AID132577Immunosuppressive activity was determined by ex vivo murine-based model of immunosuppression, compound was administered perorally in mouse.1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-18, Volume: 8, Issue:16
C32-O-imidazol-2-yl-methyl ether derivatives of the immunosuppressant ascomycin with improved therapeutic potential.
AID416851Toxicity to human skin assessed as damage of skin integrity at 2 fold MIC administered 30 mins post inoculation followed by once in every 2 days for 7 days by scanning electron microscopy2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Oct, Volume: 51, Issue:10
Targeting the calcineurin pathway enhances ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitors against Trichophyton mentagrophytes in vitro and in a human skin infection model.
AID1676556Inhibition of calcineurin phosphatase activity (unknown origin)2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 12-01, Volume: 30, Issue:23
Antifungal polybrominated proxyphylline derivative induces Candida albicans calcineurin stress response in Galleria mellonella.
AID1450257Antagonist activity at human FKBP12 measured after 30 mins by fluorescein labelled SLF tracer based fluorescence polarization assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 27, Issue:11
A calcineurin antifungal strategy with analogs of FK506.
AID1725666Antiplasmodial activity against blood stage of Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 assessed as parasite growth inhibition2020ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-12, Volume: 11, Issue:11
Targeted Covalent Inhibition of
AID180555The compound was tested in vivo for lympho-proliferation,against popliteal lymph node(inbred male rats) after i.p. administration1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-21, Volume: 42, Issue:21
Retention of immunosuppressant activity in an ascomycin analogue lacking a hydrogen-bonding interaction with FKBP12.
AID1450277Antifungal activity against Cryptococcus neoformans by broth macrodilution method2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 27, Issue:11
A calcineurin antifungal strategy with analogs of FK506.
AID248998Inhibitory activity against IFN-gamma production (Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody stimulated and cultured CD4 positive cells purified from human peripheral blood mononuclear cell)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-23, Volume: 47, Issue:20
A locally active antiinflammatory macrolide (MLD987) for inhalation therapy of asthma.
AID210301Compound was evaluated for inhibition of T-cell proliferation induced by PMA-ionomycin.1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-29, Volume: 42, Issue:15
32-Indolyl ether derivatives of ascomycin: three-dimensional structures of complexes with FK506-binding protein.
AID200886Exogenous inhibition concentration of Serine/threonine protein phosphatase 4 (PP4); ND means no data2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-14, Volume: 45, Issue:6
Serine-threonine protein phosphatase inhibitors: development of potential therapeutic strategies.
AID1209612Inhibition of CYP3A-mediated 1'-OH midazolam formation in human liver microsomes preincubated for 15 mins before substrate addition by LC-MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID1221956Apparent permeability from apical to basolateral side of human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID1217123Drug metabolism in human intestine assessed as glucuronidation at 25 to 750 uM after 1 hr by Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID654111Antiinflammatory activity in rat RBL2H3 cells assessed as inhibition of DNP-BSA-induced TNF-alpha production preincubated for 15 mins prior DNP-BSA challenge measured after 30 mins by ELISA2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 22, Issue:7
Design and synthesis of a vialinin A analog with a potent inhibitory activity of TNF-α production and its transformation into a couple of bioprobes.
AID678950TP_TRANSPORTER: transepithelial transport of tacrolimus (basal to apical) (Tacrolimus: 6.2 uM) in MDR1-expressing LLC-PK1 cells1993The Journal of biological chemistry, Mar-25, Volume: 268, Issue:9
Human P-glycoprotein transports cyclosporin A and FK506.
AID554487Antifungal activity against cnaA deficient Aspergillus fumigatus Af293 assessed as abnormal hyphal growth by CLSI method2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 53, Issue:2
Differential effects of inhibiting chitin and 1,3-{beta}-D-glucan synthesis in ras and calcineurin mutants of Aspergillus fumigatus.
AID1221963Transporter substrate index ratio of permeability from apical to basolateral side in human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of P-gp inhibitor LY3359792011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID190402Axonal regeneration rate to promote nerve regeneration in rats with lesioned sciatic nerves was measured after 2 mg/kg sc daily administration; nd ='Not determined'1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-17, Volume: 41, Issue:26
Immunophilins: beyond immunosuppression.
AID554494Antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus H237 expressing dominant-active rasA gene assessed as abnormal hyphal growth by CLSI method2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 53, Issue:2
Differential effects of inhibiting chitin and 1,3-{beta}-D-glucan synthesis in ras and calcineurin mutants of Aspergillus fumigatus.
AID176525Cytotoxicity was determined by hypothermia induction after intravenous administration in rat1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID1209604Ratio of IC50 for human CYP3A5 expressed in supersomes by coincubation study to IC50 for human CYP3A5 expressed in supersomes by preincubation study2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID90649Inhibition of human mixed lymphocyte response (MLR)1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-21, Volume: 41, Issue:11
32-Ascomycinyloxyacetic acid derived immunosuppressants. Independence of immunophilin binding and immunosuppressive potency.
AID507021Inhibition of SAP130 in VEGF-stimulated human U251 cells by PLAP reporter gene assay2007Nature chemical biology, Sep, Volume: 3, Issue:9
Splicing factor SF3b as a target of the antitumor natural product pladienolide.
AID247103Intravenous dose that inhibits by 50% the allergen OA-induced eosinophil influx in to the airway lumen of actively sensitized rats after -6h, +24h treatment schedule2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-23, Volume: 47, Issue:20
A locally active antiinflammatory macrolide (MLD987) for inhalation therapy of asthma.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID625277FDA Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base Benchmark Dataset (LTKB-BD) drugs of less concern for DILI2011Drug discovery today, Aug, Volume: 16, Issue:15-16
FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
AID240685Inhibitory activity against macrophilin (FKBP-12)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-23, Volume: 47, Issue:20
A locally active antiinflammatory macrolide (MLD987) for inhalation therapy of asthma.
AID1209600Inhibition of human CYP3A4 expressed in supersomes assessed inhibition of 1'-OH midazolam formation by LC-MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID1873213Inhibition of ABCG2 (unknown origin) expressed in human HEK293 cells mediated pheophorbide A efflux and measured after 90 mins by FACSflow cytometry2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-05, Volume: 237Targeting breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2): Functional inhibitors and expression modulators.
AID340893Antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus assessed as induction of stunted hyphal tips at 20 ng/ml after 6 hrs2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Aug, Volume: 51, Issue:8
Calcineurin inhibition or mutation enhances cell wall inhibitors against Aspergillus fumigatus.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1576823Immunosuppressive activity against BJ6 mouse CD4-positive T cells assessed as inhibition of CD3/CD28-induced cell proliferation2019Journal of natural products, 08-23, Volume: 82, Issue:8
Biosynthesis of Nonimmunosuppressive FK506 Analogues with Antifungal Activity.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID142574In vivo immunosuppression in murine models by splenic T-cell proliferation assay after peroral administration1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID1450273AUClast in mouse at 3 mg/kg, iv2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 27, Issue:11
A calcineurin antifungal strategy with analogs of FK506.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1209603Ratio of IC50 for human CYP3A4 expressed in supersomes by coincubation study to IC50 for human CYP3A4 expressed in supersomes by preincubation study2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID173625In vivo immunosuppressive activity was evaluated by surgically implanting the hearts from Brown Norway rats into the peritoneal cavity of histoincompatible Lewis rats and rejection was assessed1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-14, Volume: 38, Issue:8
The C-32 triacetyl-L-rhamnose derivative of ascomycin: a potent, orally active macrolactone immunosuppressant.
AID1179559Binding affinity to FKBP12 (unknown origin) by NMR analysis2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 57, Issue:19
Elements and modulation of functional dynamics.
AID188422Tested for nephrotoxicity in Dawley rats and measured for plasma drug level after intravenous administration at dose 10 mg/kg1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID69104Effective concentration against FK506 binding protein 12 using [3H]-dihydro FK-5061999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID1209601Inhibition of human CYP3A4 expressed in supersomes assessed inhibition of 1'-OH midazolam formation preincubated with compound before substrate addition by LC-MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1209602Reversible competitive inhibition of human CYP3A5-mediated 1'-OH midazolam formation in human liver microsomes after 7.5 mins by nonlinear regression study2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID1209595Inhibition of human CYP3A5 expressed in supersomes assessed inhibition of 1'-OH midazolam formation preincubated with compound before substrate addition by LC-MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID1293681Binding affinity to FKBP51 (unknown origin) by competitive fluorescence polarization assay2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 59, Issue:6
Rapid, Structure-Based Exploration of Pipecolic Acid Amides as Novel Selective Antagonists of the FK506-Binding Protein 51.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1676175Immunosuppressive activity in BALB/C mouse Splenocyte assessed as inhibition of Con A induced cell proliferation at 512 nM after 72 hrs by FACS assay relative to control2020Journal of natural products, 09-25, Volume: 83, Issue:9
Discovery of an Oxepine-Containing Diketopiperazine Derivative Active against Concanavalin A-Induced Hepatitis.
AID432798Effect on calcineurine level in plasma of transplant patient by MVista microbiological assay2008Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 52, Issue:2
Effect of calcineurin inhibitors on posaconazole blood levels as measured by the MVista microbiological assay.
AID340891Antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus assessed as inhibition of hyphal growth at 20 ng/ml by radial growth assay2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Aug, Volume: 51, Issue:8
Calcineurin inhibition or mutation enhances cell wall inhibitors against Aspergillus fumigatus.
AID45444Inhibitory activity against Calcineurin (CaN phosphatase)1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID444056Fraction escaping gut-wall elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID210271In vitro inhibitory activity against human T-cell proliferation.1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-14, Volume: 38, Issue:8
The C-32 triacetyl-L-rhamnose derivative of ascomycin: a potent, orally active macrolactone immunosuppressant.
AID678907TP_TRANSPORTER: increase in blood concentration in mdr1a(-/-) mouse1999Pharmaceutical research, Aug, Volume: 16, Issue:8
P-glycoprotein-dependent disposition kinetics of tacrolimus: studies in mdr1a knockout mice.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1209611Inhibition of CYP3A-mediated 1'-OH midazolam formation in human liver microsomes after 7.5 mins by LC-MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID18971Distribution coefficient (Log D) value at pH 6.51998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-21, Volume: 8, Issue:8
Studies on an immunosuppressive macrolactam, ascomycin: synthesis of a C-33 hydroxyl derivative.
AID444053Renal clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID432791Effect on drug distribution assessed as fluconazole level in plasma of transplant patient within 6 weeks of testing by gas-liquid chromatography2008Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 52, Issue:2
Effect of calcineurin inhibitors on posaconazole blood levels as measured by the MVista microbiological assay.
AID188415Tested for nephrotoxicity in Dawley rats and measured for blood urea nitrogen levels after intravenous administration at dose 2.5 mg/kg1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID679281TP_TRANSPORTER: mRNA expression level of MDR1 was inversely related to the concentration/dose ratio in vivo, recipients of living-donor liver transplantation2001Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Pharmacokinetic and prognostic significance of intestinal MDR1 expression in recipients of living-donor liver transplantation.
AID1753121Neurotrophic activity in ICR mouse primary hippocampal neuron assessed as increase in relative spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic current frequency at -70 mV holding potential at 1 ng/ml incubated for 10 to 14 days in presence of bicuculline methiodide
AID178234Inhibition of rat popliteal lymph node (PLN) hyperplasia when given ip1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-21, Volume: 41, Issue:11
32-Ascomycinyloxyacetic acid derived immunosuppressants. Independence of immunophilin binding and immunosuppressive potency.
AID247099Oral dose that inhibits by 50% the allergen OA-induced eosinophil influx in to the airway lumen of actively sensitized rats after -1h, +24h treatment schedule2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-23, Volume: 47, Issue:20
A locally active antiinflammatory macrolide (MLD987) for inhalation therapy of asthma.
AID357931Immunosuppressant activity in mouse T cells assessed as inhibition of concanavalin A-induced cell proliferation2001Journal of natural products, Sep, Volume: 64, Issue:9
Immunomodulatory constituents from an Ascomycete, Eupenicillium crustaceum, and revised absolute structure of macrophorin D.
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID192166Weight difference between EDL muscles of axotomized left hind limbs and corresponding right controls 10 weeks (dose=1 mg/kg)1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-09, Volume: 42, Issue:18
Synthesis and cytotoxic evaluation of cycloheximide derivatives as potential inhibitors of FKBP12 with neuroregenerative properties.
AID200739Exogenous inhibition concentration of Serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A); ND means no data2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-14, Volume: 45, Issue:6
Serine-threonine protein phosphatase inhibitors: development of potential therapeutic strategies.
AID304390Metabolic stability in human liver microsomes assessed as inhibition of 6-hydroxy testosterone formation at 10 uM2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 50, Issue:26
Nuclear magnetic resonance fragment-based identification of novel FKBP12 inhibitors.
AID1221962Efflux ratio of permeability from apical to basolateral side over basolateral to apical side of human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of P-gp inhibitor LY3359792011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID1473825Ratio of drug concentration at steady state in human at 0.075 to 0.26 mg/kg, po after 24 hrs to IC50 for human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID238358Inhibitory activity against calcineurin phosphatase2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-23, Volume: 47, Issue:20
A locally active antiinflammatory macrolide (MLD987) for inhalation therapy of asthma.
AID1217118Activity of UGT1A4*3 mutant (unknown origin) overexpressed in HEK293 cells assessed as intrinsic clearance for enzyme-mediated glucuronidation by measuring ratio of Vmax to Km at 25 to 750 uM after 1 hr by Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID190401Axonal regeneration rate to promote nerve regeneration in rats with lesioned sciatic nerves was measured after 1 mg/kg sc daily administration.1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-17, Volume: 41, Issue:26
Immunophilins: beyond immunosuppression.
AID69100Binding affinity against FK506 binding protein2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
SMall Molecule Growth 2001 (SMoG2001): an improved knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.
AID444055Fraction absorbed in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1730842Binding affinity to FKBP12 (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293 cells co-expressing FRB assessed as induction of FKBP12-FRB dimerization at 100 uM measured for 15 mins by nano-glo live cell reagent based luminescence assay2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-05, Volume: 213Discovery of a novel family of FKBP12 "reshapers" and their use as calcium modulators in skeletal muscle under nitro-oxidative stress.
AID235600Ratio of hypothermia (ED50) by Murine (ED50) in vivo1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID247104Intratracheal dose that inhibits by 50% the allergen OA-induced eosinophil influx in to the airway lumen of actively sensitized rats after -1h, +24h treatment schedule2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-23, Volume: 47, Issue:20
A locally active antiinflammatory macrolide (MLD987) for inhalation therapy of asthma.
AID416852Antifungal activity against Trichophyton mentagrophytes DUMC160.03 infected in human skin at 2 fold MIC administered 30 mins post infection followed by once in every 2 days for 7 days by scanning electron microscopy relative to control2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Oct, Volume: 51, Issue:10
Targeting the calcineurin pathway enhances ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitors against Trichophyton mentagrophytes in vitro and in a human skin infection model.
AID399512Immunosuppressive activity in BALB/c mouse splenic B lymphocytes assessed as inhibition of LPS-induced cell proliferation after 72 hrs by MTT assay2004Journal of natural products, Jan, Volume: 67, Issue:1
Immunomodulatory constituents from an Ascomycete, Chaetomium seminudum.
AID678739TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Vinblastine efflux (Vinblastine: 0.002 uM, FK-506: 10 uM) in P388/S and P388/ADR cells2000Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology, Aug, Volume: 27, Issue:8
Reversal of anticancer drug resistance by macrolide antibiotics in vitro and in vivo.
AID1209597Inhibition of human CYP3A4 expressed in supersomes assessed inhibition of 1'-OH midazolam formation preincubated with compound for 2.5 to 30 mins followed by addition of 20-fold diluted buffer with 20 uM MDZ by LC-MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID243422log (1/Km) value for human liver microsome cytochrome P450 3A42005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-15, Volume: 15, Issue:18
Modeling K(m) values using electrotopological state: substrates for cytochrome P450 3A4-mediated metabolism.
AID190403Axonal regeneration rate to promote nerve regeneration in rats with lesioned sciatic nerves was measured after 5 mg/kg sc daily administration.1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-17, Volume: 41, Issue:26
Immunophilins: beyond immunosuppression.
AID1217121Activity of UGT1A4*4 mutant (unknown origin) overexpressed in HEK293 cells assessed as intrinsic clearance for enzyme-mediated glucuronidation by measuring ratio of Vmax to Km at 25 to 750 uM after 1 hr by Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID340899Effect on cellular morphology of Aspergillus fumigatus assessed as induction hyphal tips blunting at 20 ng/ml2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Aug, Volume: 51, Issue:8
Calcineurin inhibition or mutation enhances cell wall inhibitors against Aspergillus fumigatus.
AID1473824Ratio of drug concentration at steady state in human at 0.075 to 0.26 mg/kg, po after 24 hrs to IC50 for human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1209606Competitive inhibition of CYP3A in human liver microsomes2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID210270In vitro inhibitory activity against human T-cell production of lymphokine IL-21995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-14, Volume: 38, Issue:8
The C-32 triacetyl-L-rhamnose derivative of ascomycin: a potent, orally active macrolactone immunosuppressant.
AID210433Immunosuppressive activity examined in an in vitro model of allogenic T-lymphocyte activation (by MLR assay)1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-21, Volume: 42, Issue:21
Retention of immunosuppressant activity in an ascomycin analogue lacking a hydrogen-bonding interaction with FKBP12.
AID1217130Activity of UGT1A4*1 mutant (unknown origin) overexpressed in HEK293 cells assessed as enzyme-mediated glucuronidation at 25 to 750 uM after 1 hr by Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID1874129Toxicity in BALB/c mouse xenografted with mouse 4T1 cells assessed as effect on body weight at 5 mg/kg, ip administered daily for 5 days
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID1215095Competitive binding affinity to human PXR LBD (111 to 434) by TR-FRET assay relative to SR128132011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID1221960Apparent permeability from apical to basolateral side of human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of P-gp inhibitor LY3359792011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID242652Inhibitory activity against IL-2 receptor in human T-cell jurkat cell line stimulated by phytohemagglutininin and phorbol myristate acetate2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-23, Volume: 47, Issue:20
A locally active antiinflammatory macrolide (MLD987) for inhalation therapy of asthma.
AID248657Inhibitory activity against PPD-induced proliferation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (HPBMNC)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-23, Volume: 47, Issue:20
A locally active antiinflammatory macrolide (MLD987) for inhalation therapy of asthma.
AID21330Solubility at pH 6.51998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-21, Volume: 8, Issue:8
Studies on an immunosuppressive macrolactam, ascomycin: synthesis of a C-33 hydroxyl derivative.
AID188418Tested for nephrotoxicity in Dawley rats and measured for blood urea nitrogen levels after intravenous administration at dose 20 mg/kg; ND denotes not determined1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID247102Intravenous dose that inhibits by 50% the allergen OA-induced eosinophil influx in to the airway lumen of actively sensitized rats after -1h, +24h treatment schedule2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-23, Volume: 47, Issue:20
A locally active antiinflammatory macrolide (MLD987) for inhalation therapy of asthma.
AID554488Antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus Af293 expressing cnaA gene assessed as abnormal hyphal growth by CLSI method2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 53, Issue:2
Differential effects of inhibiting chitin and 1,3-{beta}-D-glucan synthesis in ras and calcineurin mutants of Aspergillus fumigatus.
AID1215092Activation of human PXR expressed in human HepG2 (DPX-2) cells assessed as induction of CYP3A4 up to 46 uM after 24 hrs by luminescent analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID185224Minimum neurotoxic dose/Cmax was determined from ED50(rat adjuvant arthritis)1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-14, Volume: 38, Issue:8
The C-32 triacetyl-L-rhamnose derivative of ascomycin: a potent, orally active macrolactone immunosuppressant.
AID200747Exogenous inhibition concentration of Serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C); ND means no data2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-14, Volume: 45, Issue:6
Serine-threonine protein phosphatase inhibitors: development of potential therapeutic strategies.
AID1473823Drug concentration at steady state in human at 0.075 to 0.26 mg/kg, po after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID90650Compound was tested in vitro for inhibition of human mixed lymphocyte proliferation (HuMLR)1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-21, Volume: 8, Issue:8
Studies on an immunosuppressive macrolactam, ascomycin: synthesis of a C-33 hydroxyl derivative.
AID1566069Inhibition of FKBP12-mediated calcineurin activation in PMA/ionomycin stimulated human Jurkat cells transfected with NFAT-Luc assessed as reduction in NFAT reporter activity at 1 uM pretreated for 30 mins prior to PMA/ionomycin activation measured after 62019ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-12, Volume: 10, Issue:9
One-step Heck Reaction Generates Nonimmunosuppressive FK506 Analogs for Pharmacological BMP Activation.
AID1889305Permeability in rat jejunum2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-10, Volume: 65, Issue:3
Dose Number as a Tool to Guide Lead Optimization for Orally Bioavailable Compounds in Drug Discovery.
AID69095Relative binding affinity of compound for FK506 binding protein (FKBP)1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-29, Volume: 42, Issue:15
32-Indolyl ether derivatives of ascomycin: three-dimensional structures of complexes with FK506-binding protein.
AID69106Inhibitory binding activity against human Immunophilin-FK-506 binding protein 121998Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-21, Volume: 41, Issue:11
32-Ascomycinyloxyacetic acid derived immunosuppressants. Independence of immunophilin binding and immunosuppressive potency.
AID1636432Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2D6-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 52.1 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of N2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID340900Effect on cellular morphology of Aspergillus fumigatus expressing delta-cnaA mutant assessed as induction hyphal tips blunting at 20 ng/ml2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Aug, Volume: 51, Issue:8
Calcineurin inhibition or mutation enhances cell wall inhibitors against Aspergillus fumigatus.
AID1209596Inhibition of human CYP3A5 expressed in supersomes assessed inhibition of 1'-OH midazolam formation preincubated with compound for 2.5 to 30 mins followed by addition of 20-fold diluted buffer with 20 uM MDZ by LC-MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID1566071Cytotoxicity against human HUVEC cells assessed as inhibition of cell growth at 1 to 10 uM measured after 72 hrs by resazurin dye based assay2019ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-12, Volume: 10, Issue:9
One-step Heck Reaction Generates Nonimmunosuppressive FK506 Analogs for Pharmacological BMP Activation.
AID399511Immunosuppressive activity in BALB/c mouse splenic T lymphocytes assessed as inhibition of Con A-induced cell proliferation after 72 hrs by MTT assay2004Journal of natural products, Jan, Volume: 67, Issue:1
Immunomodulatory constituents from an Ascomycete, Chaetomium seminudum.
AID444052Hepatic clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID172317Nephrotoxic potential was tested in spontaneously hypertensive rats by administering 10 mg/kg/day intraperitoneally for 5 days1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-18, Volume: 8, Issue:16
C32-O-imidazol-2-yl-methyl ether derivatives of the immunosuppressant ascomycin with improved therapeutic potential.
AID21331Solubility at pH 7.41998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-21, Volume: 8, Issue:8
Studies on an immunosuppressive macrolactam, ascomycin: synthesis of a C-33 hydroxyl derivative.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID172316Nephrotoxic potential was tested in spontaneously hypertensive rats by administering 0 mg/kg/day intraperitoneally for 5 days1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-18, Volume: 8, Issue:16
C32-O-imidazol-2-yl-methyl ether derivatives of the immunosuppressant ascomycin with improved therapeutic potential.
AID186882Mean axonal area to promote nerve regeneration in rats with lesioned sciatic nerves was measured after 10 mg/kg sc daily administration.1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-17, Volume: 41, Issue:26
Immunophilins: beyond immunosuppression.
AID140246In vitro immunosuppressive activity measured in the mouse mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) expressed as relative inhibitory concentration (rIC50) relative to FK506 IC50 (0.3 nM)1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-18, Volume: 9, Issue:2
Preparation and immunosuppressive activity of 32-(O)-acylated and 32-(O)-thioacylated analogues of ascomycin.
AID1217119Activity of UGT1A4*4 mutant (unknown origin) overexpressed in HEK293 cells assessed as enzyme-mediated glucuronidation after 1 hr by Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID185223Minimum neurotoxic dose from ED50(rat adjuvant arthritis)1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-14, Volume: 38, Issue:8
The C-32 triacetyl-L-rhamnose derivative of ascomycin: a potent, orally active macrolactone immunosuppressant.
AID554489Antifungal activity against crzA deficient Aspergillus fumigatus Af293 assessed as abnormal hyphal growth by CLSI method2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 53, Issue:2
Differential effects of inhibiting chitin and 1,3-{beta}-D-glucan synthesis in ras and calcineurin mutants of Aspergillus fumigatus.
AID425653Renal clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID1217122Drug metabolism in human intestine assessed as glucuronidation after 1 hr by Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID1874131Toxicity in BALB/c mouse xenografted with mouse 4T1 cells assessed as effect on health conditions at 5 mg/kg, ip administered daily for 5 days
AID172319Nephrotoxic potential was tested in spontaneously hypertensive rats by administering 40 mg/kg/day intraperitoneally for 5 days1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-18, Volume: 8, Issue:16
C32-O-imidazol-2-yl-methyl ether derivatives of the immunosuppressant ascomycin with improved therapeutic potential.
AID554491Antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus H237 assessed as abnormal hyphal growth by CLSI method2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 53, Issue:2
Differential effects of inhibiting chitin and 1,3-{beta}-D-glucan synthesis in ras and calcineurin mutants of Aspergillus fumigatus.
AID1889295Aqueous solubility of the compound2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-10, Volume: 65, Issue:3
Dose Number as a Tool to Guide Lead Optimization for Orally Bioavailable Compounds in Drug Discovery.
AID200742Exogenous inhibition concentration of Serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2B (PP2B)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-14, Volume: 45, Issue:6
Serine-threonine protein phosphatase inhibitors: development of potential therapeutic strategies.
AID554490Antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus Af293 expressing crzA gene assessed as abnormal hyphal growth by CLSI method2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 53, Issue:2
Differential effects of inhibiting chitin and 1,3-{beta}-D-glucan synthesis in ras and calcineurin mutants of Aspergillus fumigatus.
AID131392Neurotoxic activity was determined by measuring compound-induced hypothermia in BALB/c mice, after administering intravenously in mouse.1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-18, Volume: 8, Issue:16
C32-O-imidazol-2-yl-methyl ether derivatives of the immunosuppressant ascomycin with improved therapeutic potential.
AID444051Total clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID188420Tested for nephrotoxicity in Dawley rats and measured for blood urea nitrogen levels after intravenous administration at dose 40 mg/kg; ND denotes not determined1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID188423Tested for nephrotoxicity in Dawley rats and measured for plasma drug level after intravenous administration at dose 2.5 mg/kg1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID1576828Synergistic antifungal activity against Cryptococcus neoformans H99 assessed as FIC index in presence of fluconazole2019Journal of natural products, 08-23, Volume: 82, Issue:8
Biosynthesis of Nonimmunosuppressive FK506 Analogues with Antifungal Activity.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID69107The compound was tested for binding affinity against human FK506 binding protein 121999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-21, Volume: 42, Issue:21
Retention of immunosuppressant activity in an ascomycin analogue lacking a hydrogen-bonding interaction with FKBP12.
AID1636375Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 70.3 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of N2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID188428Tested for nephrotoxicity in Dawley rats and measured for plasma drug level after intravenous administration at dose 40 mg/kg; ND denotes not determined1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID554943Inhibition of Candida krusei Abc1p expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolate AD assessed as reduction of itraconazole MIC at 5 ug after 48 hrs by agarose diffusion assay2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 53, Issue:2
Abc1p is a multidrug efflux transporter that tips the balance in favor of innate azole resistance in Candida krusei.
AID1221958Efflux ratio of permeability from apical to basolateral side over basolateral to apical side of human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID177348In vivo immunosuppressive activity was evaluated by inducing arthritis in lewis rats and measuring the secondary lesions after 16 days1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-14, Volume: 38, Issue:8
The C-32 triacetyl-L-rhamnose derivative of ascomycin: a potent, orally active macrolactone immunosuppressant.
AID1221966Ratio of plasma AUC in po dosed mdr1 knock out mouse to plasma AUC in po dosed wild type mouse2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID554945Inhibition of Candida krusei IF011 Abc1p assessed as reduction of itraconazole MIC at 5 ug after 48 hrs by agarose diffusion assay2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 53, Issue:2
Abc1p is a multidrug efflux transporter that tips the balance in favor of innate azole resistance in Candida krusei.
AID50622In Vitro neurotrophic effect was measured in cultured chick DRG sensory neurons.1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-17, Volume: 41, Issue:26
Immunophilins: beyond immunosuppression.
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID1217116Activity of UGT1A4*3 mutant (unknown origin) overexpressed in HEK293 cells assessed as enzyme-mediated glucuronidation after 1 hr by Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID45445Inhibition of calcineurin phosphatase activity by the compound1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-29, Volume: 42, Issue:15
32-Indolyl ether derivatives of ascomycin: three-dimensional structures of complexes with FK506-binding protein.
AID1393131Effect on anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibody-induced cell activation in human T cells assessed as effect on CD69 expression at 0.1 uM incubated for 24 hrs by flow cytometry (Rvb = 41.2%)2017Journal of natural products, 04-28, Volume: 80, Issue:4
Monoterpenoid Indole Alkaloids from Kopsia officinalis and the Immunosuppressive Activity of Rhazinilam.
AID1217132Activity of UGT1A4*2 mutant (unknown origin) overexpressed in HEK293 cells assessed as enzyme-mediated glucuronidation after 1 hr by Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID190327Therapeutic index was determined from the ratio of MND to the ED50 Cmax.(rat adjuvant arthritis)1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-14, Volume: 38, Issue:8
The C-32 triacetyl-L-rhamnose derivative of ascomycin: a potent, orally active macrolactone immunosuppressant.
AID304388Induction of neurite outgrowth in Long-Evans rat E18/19 cortical neurons after 72 hrs2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 50, Issue:26
Nuclear magnetic resonance fragment-based identification of novel FKBP12 inhibitors.
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID172318Nephrotoxic potential was tested in spontaneously hypertensive rats by administering 20 mg/kg/day intraperitoneally for 5 days1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-18, Volume: 8, Issue:16
C32-O-imidazol-2-yl-methyl ether derivatives of the immunosuppressant ascomycin with improved therapeutic potential.
AID1221965Transporter substrate index of efflux ratio in human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of P-gp inhibitor LY3359792011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID235207Therapeutic index is the plasma Cmax ratio of the minimum neurotoxic dose over the ED50 dose in rat adjuvant arthritis1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-14, Volume: 38, Issue:8
The C-32 triacetyl-L-rhamnose derivative of ascomycin: a potent, orally active macrolactone immunosuppressant.
AID1221961Apparent permeability from basolateral to apical side of human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of P-gp inhibitor LY3359792011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID1217114Activity of UGT1A4*2 mutant (unknown origin) overexpressed in HEK293 cells assessed as enzyme-mediated glucuronidation at 25 to 750 uM after 1 hr by Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID1217129Activity of UGT1A4*1 mutant (unknown origin) overexpressed in HEK293 cells assessed as enzyme-mediated glucuronidation after 1 hr by Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID188414Tested for nephrotoxicity in Dawley rats and measured for blood urea nitrogen levels after intravenous administration at dose 10 mg/kg1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID176172Compound was tested in vivo for immunosuppressive activity using rat popliteal lymph node (rPLN) hyperplasia assay1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-21, Volume: 8, Issue:8
Studies on an immunosuppressive macrolactam, ascomycin: synthesis of a C-33 hydroxyl derivative.
AID340894Antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus ungerminated conidia assessed as delay in germ-tube extension at 20 ng/ml after 60 hrs of fungal growth2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Aug, Volume: 51, Issue:8
Calcineurin inhibition or mutation enhances cell wall inhibitors against Aspergillus fumigatus.
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID1217131Activity of UGT1A4*1 mutant (unknown origin) overexpressed in HEK293 cells assessed as intrinsic clearance for enzyme-mediated glucuronidation by measuring ratio of Vmax to Km at 25 to 750 uM after 1 hr by Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID1215093Activation of rat PXR expressed in human HepG2 cells up to 46 uM after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene based luminescent analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID1676555Inhibition of calcineurin phosphatase activity in human Jurkat cells by Western blot analysis2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 12-01, Volume: 30, Issue:23
Antifungal polybrominated proxyphylline derivative induces Candida albicans calcineurin stress response in Galleria mellonella.
AID1753118Immunosuppressive activity in C57BL/6J mouse CD4+ve T cells assessed as inhibition of CD3/CD28-stimulated CD4+ve T cell proliferation incubated for 72 hrs by CellTrace-violet staining based flow cytometry analysis
AID1221957Apparent permeability from basolateral to apical side of human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID1215094Competitive binding affinity to human PXR LBD (111 to 434) by TR-FRET assay2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID587069Inhibition of Pdrp5-mediated rhodamine 6G accumulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae AD124567 at 20 uM after 2 hrs by fluorescence microscopic analysis2011Journal of natural products, Feb-25, Volume: 74, Issue:2
Oroidin inhibits the activity of the multidrug resistance target Pdr5p from yeast plasma membranes.
AID188429Tested for nephrotoxicity in Dawley rats and measured for plasma drug level after intravenous administration at dose 5 mg/kg1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID1566070Induction of FKBP12-mediated SMAD1/5 phosphorylation in human Jurkat cells measured after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis2019ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-12, Volume: 10, Issue:9
One-step Heck Reaction Generates Nonimmunosuppressive FK506 Analogs for Pharmacological BMP Activation.
AID1473822AUC in human at 0.075 to 0.26 mg/kg, po after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID274278Inhibition of DNP7-BSA antigen-induced TNFalpha release in rat RBL-2H3 cells2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-15, Volume: 16, Issue:20
Vialinin B, a novel potent inhibitor of TNF-alpha production, isolated from an edible mushroom, Thelephora vialis.
AID1450258Antagonist activity at Aspergillus fumigatus FKBP12 measured after 30 mins by fluorescein labelled SLF tracer based fluorescence polarization assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 27, Issue:11
A calcineurin antifungal strategy with analogs of FK506.
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID304389Metabolic stability in human liver microsomes2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 50, Issue:26
Nuclear magnetic resonance fragment-based identification of novel FKBP12 inhibitors.
AID69108Compound was tested for its ability to inhibit FK506 binding protein 12 rotamase activity1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-17, Volume: 41, Issue:26
Immunophilins: beyond immunosuppression.
AID444050Fraction unbound in human plasma2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID13709Drug plasma level in rat was determined on the last day of dosing at 1,2,4.8 and 24 hr and ED50 was evaluated1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-14, Volume: 38, Issue:8
The C-32 triacetyl-L-rhamnose derivative of ascomycin: a potent, orally active macrolactone immunosuppressant.
AID1209594Inhibition of human CYP3A5 expressed in supersomes assessed inhibition of 1'-OH midazolam formation by LC-MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID1065394Oral bioavailability in human2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Macrocyclic drugs and clinical candidates: what can medicinal chemists learn from their properties?
AID311524Oral bioavailability in human2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Hologram QSAR model for the prediction of human oral bioavailability.
AID235751Therapeutic index was determined as mouse hypothermia ED50/murine ex vivo ED501998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-18, Volume: 8, Issue:16
C32-O-imidazol-2-yl-methyl ether derivatives of the immunosuppressant ascomycin with improved therapeutic potential.
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID1209613Reversible competitive inhibition of human CYP3A4-mediated 1'-OH midazolam formation in human liver microsomes after 7.5 mins by nonlinear regression study2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID761520Inhibition of TNF-alpha production in rat RBL2H3 cells after 16 hrs by ELISA2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 23, Issue:15
Vialinin A is a ubiquitin-specific peptidase inhibitor.
AID559691Antimicrobial activity against Rhizopus oryzae after 24 hrs by broth microdilution checkerboard procedure2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Aug, Volume: 53, Issue:8
In vitro interactions between antifungals and immunosuppressive drugs against zygomycetes.
AID1450261Immunosuppressive activity in PMA/ionomycin stimulated human Jurkat T cells assessed as suppression of IL2 production pretreated for 15 to 30 mins followed by PMA/ionomycin addition measured after 18 to 20 hrs by ELISA2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 27, Issue:11
A calcineurin antifungal strategy with analogs of FK506.
AID1217125Drug metabolism in human liver microsomes assessed as glucuronidation at 200 uM after 16 hrs by LC-MS analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID559693Antimicrobial activity against Mucor circinelloides after 24 hrs by broth microdilution checkerboard procedure2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Aug, Volume: 53, Issue:8
In vitro interactions between antifungals and immunosuppressive drugs against zygomycetes.
AID559692Antimicrobial activity against Mycocladus corymbiferus after 24 hrs by broth microdilution checkerboard procedure2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Aug, Volume: 53, Issue:8
In vitro interactions between antifungals and immunosuppressive drugs against zygomycetes.
AID1450278Antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus by broth macrodilution method2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 27, Issue:11
A calcineurin antifungal strategy with analogs of FK506.
AID1217120Activity of UGT1A4*4 mutant (unknown origin) overexpressed in HEK293 cells assessed as enzyme-mediated glucuronidation at 25 to 750 uM after 1 hr by Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID91890In vitro immunosuppressive activity measured in the interleukin-2 receptor gene assay (IL-2 RGA) in mitogen-stimulated human T-cell line; relative to FK5061999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-18, Volume: 9, Issue:2
Preparation and immunosuppressive activity of 32-(O)-acylated and 32-(O)-thioacylated analogues of ascomycin.
AID1566067Activation of FKBP12-mediated BMP signaling pathway in human Jurkat cells transfected with BRE-Luc at 1 nM to 1 uM measured after 18 hrs by luciferase reporter assay2019ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-12, Volume: 10, Issue:9
One-step Heck Reaction Generates Nonimmunosuppressive FK506 Analogs for Pharmacological BMP Activation.
AID1576825Antifungal activity against Candida albicans SC53142019Journal of natural products, 08-23, Volume: 82, Issue:8
Biosynthesis of Nonimmunosuppressive FK506 Analogues with Antifungal Activity.
AID190400Axonal regeneration rate to promote nerve regeneration in rats with lesioned sciatic nerves was measured after 10 mg/kg sc daily administration.1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-17, Volume: 41, Issue:26
Immunophilins: beyond immunosuppression.
AID678780TP_TRANSPORTER: increase in brain concentration in mdr1a(-/-) mouse1999Pharmaceutical research, Aug, Volume: 16, Issue:8
P-glycoprotein-dependent disposition kinetics of tacrolimus: studies in mdr1a knockout mice.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID554486Antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus Af293 assessed as abnormal hyphal growth by CLSI method2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 53, Issue:2
Differential effects of inhibiting chitin and 1,3-{beta}-D-glucan synthesis in ras and calcineurin mutants of Aspergillus fumigatus.
AID1056375Inhibition of human recombinant calcineurin phosphatase activity using RII phosphopeptide as substrate incubated 10 to 30 mins prior to substrate addition by spectrophotometry2013ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-14, Volume: 4, Issue:11
Adamantyl derivative as a potent inhibitor of Plasmodium FK506 binding protein 35.
AID506770Displacement of [3H]probe from SAP130 in human WiDr cell immunoprecipitate sample assessed as radioactive intensity at 500 nM after 1 hr by scintillation counting relative to control2007Nature chemical biology, Sep, Volume: 3, Issue:9
Splicing factor SF3b as a target of the antitumor natural product pladienolide.
AID681166TP_TRANSPORTER: Western blot, LS180 cell1996Molecular pharmacology, Feb, Volume: 49, Issue:2
Modulators and substrates of P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P4503A coordinately up-regulate these proteins in human colon carcinoma cells.
AID1217117Activity of UGT1A4*3 mutant (unknown origin) overexpressed in HEK293 cells assessed as enzyme-mediated glucuronidation at 25 to 750 uM after 1 hr by Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID186885Mean axonal area to promote nerve regeneration in rats with lesioned sciatic nerves was measured after 5 mg/kg sc daily administration.1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-17, Volume: 41, Issue:26
Immunophilins: beyond immunosuppression.
AID268130Neuroprotective activity against 6-OHDA-induced Kunming mouse peripheral sympathetic nerve injury measured as norepinephrine content in submandibular gland at 2 mg/kg, sc2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-13, Volume: 49, Issue:14
FK506-binding protein ligands: structure-based design, synthesis, and neurotrophic/neuroprotective properties of substituted 5,5-dimethyl-2-(4-thiazolidine)carboxylates.
AID189527The compound was tested for % reduction of nephrotoxicity in rat after intravenous administration at dose 1.7 mg/kg1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID506784Inhibition of SAP130 mediated cell growth in human WiDr cells2007Nature chemical biology, Sep, Volume: 3, Issue:9
Splicing factor SF3b as a target of the antitumor natural product pladienolide.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID624660Inhibition of mycophenolic acid glucuronidation by human kidney microsomes2005Pharmacology & therapeutics, Apr, Volume: 106, Issue:1
UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and clinical drug-drug interactions.
AID444057Fraction escaping hepatic elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID247105Intratracheal dose that inhibits by 50% the allergen OA-induced eosinophil influx in to the airway lumen of actively sensitized rats after -6h, +24h treatment schedule2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-23, Volume: 47, Issue:20
A locally active antiinflammatory macrolide (MLD987) for inhalation therapy of asthma.
AID1874132Antitumor activity against mouse 4T1 cells xenografted in BALB/c mouse assessed as decrease in tumor weight at 50 mg/kg, ip measured after 15 days
AID559694Antimicrobial activity against Rhizopus microsporus after 24 hrs by broth microdilution checkerboard procedure2009Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Aug, Volume: 53, Issue:8
In vitro interactions between antifungals and immunosuppressive drugs against zygomycetes.
AID1217127Activity at human recombinant UGT1A4 assessed as enzyme-mediated tacrolimus glucuronide formation at 200 uM after 16 hrs by LC-MS analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID432792Effect on posaconazole-mediated antifungal activity against Candida kefyr ATCC 46764 at 10 ng/ml by MVista microbiological assay2008Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 52, Issue:2
Effect of calcineurin inhibitors on posaconazole blood levels as measured by the MVista microbiological assay.
AID1450270Clearance in mouse at 3 mg/kg, iv2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-01, Volume: 27, Issue:11
A calcineurin antifungal strategy with analogs of FK506.
AID1380078Antifungal activity against Cryptococcus neoformans H99 serotype A after 72 hrs by microdilution method2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-12, Volume: 61, Issue:13
Emerging New Targets for the Treatment of Resistant Fungal Infections.
AID248996Inhibitory activity against IL-5 production (Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody stimulated and cultured CD4 positive cells purified from human peripheral blood mononuclear cell)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-23, Volume: 47, Issue:20
A locally active antiinflammatory macrolide (MLD987) for inhalation therapy of asthma.
AID1209599Inhibition of human CYP3A4 expressed in supersomes assessed inhibition of 1'-OH midazolam formation preincubated at 2 uM followed by addition of 20-fold diluted buffer with 20 uM MDZ by LC-MS method in presence of NADPH2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID1730844Binding affinity to FKBP12 (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293 cells co-expressing FRB assessed as inhibition of rapamycin-induced FKBP12-FRB dimerization measured after 25 mins by nano-glo live cell reagent based luminescence assay2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-05, Volume: 213Discovery of a novel family of FKBP12 "reshapers" and their use as calcium modulators in skeletal muscle under nitro-oxidative stress.
AID678796TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Phalloidin uptake (Phalloidin: 1 uM) in OATP-C-expressing HEK293 cells2003Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, Nov, Volume: 368, Issue:5
Characterization of the transport of the bicyclic peptide phalloidin by human hepatic transport proteins.
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID188421Tested for nephrotoxicity in Dawley rats and measured for blood urea nitrogen levels after intravenous administration at dose 5 mg/kg1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID1215091Activation of human PXR expressed in human HepG2 (DPX-2) cells up to 46 uM after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene based luminescent analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID1209598Inhibition of human CYP3A5 expressed in supersomes assessed inhibition of 1'-OH midazolam formation preincubated at 2 uM followed by addition of 20-fold diluted buffer with 20 uM MDZ by LC-MS method in presence of NADPH2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID69089Compound was tested in vitro for inhibitory activity against human FK506 binding protein1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-21, Volume: 8, Issue:8
Studies on an immunosuppressive macrolactam, ascomycin: synthesis of a C-33 hydroxyl derivative.
AID1217124Intrinsic clearance in human intestine assessed as glucuronidation by measuring ratio of Vmax to Km at 25 to 750 uM after 1 hr by Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
In vitro investigation of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms responsible for tacrolimus glucuronidation: predominant contribution of UGT1A4.
AID1209614Reversible competitive inhibition of CYP3A-mediated 1'-OH midazolam formation in human liver microsomes after 7.5 mins by nonlinear regression study2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 40, Issue:4
Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.
AID186883Mean axonal area to promote nerve regeneration in rats with lesioned sciatic nerves was measured after 1 mg/kg sc daily administration.1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-17, Volume: 41, Issue:26
Immunophilins: beyond immunosuppression.
AID69259The inhibitory activity by using FK506 binding protein 12 SPA binding assay2000Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-15, Volume: 10, Issue:10
Solid-phase/solution-phase combinatorial synthesis of neuroimmunophilin ligands.
AID18973Distribution coefficent (Log D) value at pH 7.41998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-21, Volume: 8, Issue:8
Studies on an immunosuppressive macrolactam, ascomycin: synthesis of a C-33 hydroxyl derivative.
AID241013Inhibitory activity against murine mixed lymphocyte reaction2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-23, Volume: 47, Issue:20
A locally active antiinflammatory macrolide (MLD987) for inhalation therapy of asthma.
AID432794Antifungal activity against Candida kefyr ATCC 46764 after 14 to 18 hrs2008Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 52, Issue:2
Effect of calcineurin inhibitors on posaconazole blood levels as measured by the MVista microbiological assay.
AID188426Tested for nephrotoxicity in Dawley rats and measured for plasma drug level after intravenous administration at dose 20 mg/kg; ND denotes not determined1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-19, Volume: 9, Issue:14
Potent immunosuppressive C32-O-arylethyl ether derivatives of ascomycin with reduced toxicity.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1745854NCATS anti-infectives library activity on HEK293 viability as a counter-qHTS vs the C. elegans viability qHTS2023Disease models & mechanisms, 03-01, Volume: 16, Issue:3
In vivo quantitative high-throughput screening for drug discovery and comparative toxicology.
AID1745855NCATS anti-infectives library activity on the primary C. elegans qHTS viability assay2023Disease models & mechanisms, 03-01, Volume: 16, Issue:3
In vivo quantitative high-throughput screening for drug discovery and comparative toxicology.
AID1346129Human FK506 binding protein 1A (5.2.-.- Cis-trans-isomerases)1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-17, Volume: 41, Issue:26
Immunophilins: beyond immunosuppression.
AID588519A screen for compounds that inhibit viral RNA polymerase binding and polymerization activities2011Antiviral research, Sep, Volume: 91, Issue:3
High-throughput screening identification of poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (16,714)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-199095 (0.57)18.7374
1990's3560 (21.30)18.2507
2000's5835 (34.91)29.6817
2010's5411 (32.37)24.3611
2020's1813 (10.85)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 101.83

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index101.83 (24.57)
Research Supply Index9.91 (2.92)
Research Growth Index6.60 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index191.04 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.02 (0.95)

This Compound (101.83)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials2,319 (13.06%)5.53%
Reviews1,735 (9.77%)6.00%
Case Studies2,435 (13.71%)4.05%
Observational204 (1.15%)0.25%
Other11,064 (62.31%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (1052)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase II, Open-Label, Multi-Center Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Stable Pediatric Allograft Recipients Converted From a Prograf® Based Immunosuppressive Regimen to a Tacrolimus Prolonged Release, Advagraf® Based Immunosuppressiv [NCT01294020]Phase 281 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-25Active, not recruiting
Effectivness of Topical Tacrolimus 0.03% Monotherapy in Patients With Vitiligo: Arandomized Controlled Trial [NCT03358082]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-10-01Recruiting
Phase II, Single-Center, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Comparable Efficacy of Tacrolimus Extended Release Tablets (Envarsus®) to the Standard of Care (SOC) Twice Daily Tacrolimus (Prograf®) Dosing Regimen [NCT03373227]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-04Active, not recruiting
Phase Ib/II Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Oral Ixazomib in the Prophylaxis of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease. [NCT03225417]Phase 1/Phase 2142 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-16Active, not recruiting
A PHASE III, Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative, Multi - Center Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Prograf® (Tacrolimus) and MR4 (Modified Release Tacrolimus) in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT00720265]Phase 3135 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
[NCT01328834]Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
A Twelve-month, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Study of the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Everolimus With IL-2 Receptor Antagonist, Corticosteroids and Two Different Exposure Levels of Tacrolimus in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients [NCT00369161]Phase 4228 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Use of Tacrolimus Blood-bile Ratio for the Detection of Early Liver Failure After Liver Transplantation [NCT03882164]55 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2019-02-21Active, not recruiting
An Open Non Randomized Comparative Study Exploring Drug Interaction Between Colchicine and Calcineurin Inhibitors in 2 Groups (Ciclosporin Group and Tacrolimus Group) of Renal Graft Recipients [NCT01160276]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
[NCT01288664]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to sponsor withdraw from this study)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1 Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Exploratory Pharmacodynamics of LIM-0705 Given With or Without Tacrolimus in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01060475]Phase 144 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Phase I/II Dose Escalation Trial of Clofarabine, in Addition to Melphalan and Thiotepa as Myeloablative Regimen Followed by an Allogeneic Unmodified Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant From HLA-Compatible Related or Unrelated Donors for the Treatment of [NCT00423514]Phase 1/Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-20Completed
A Phase IV, Randomized, Open-label, Comparative, Single-center Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Efficacy of Advagraf® (Modified Release Tacrolimus) and Prograf® (Tacrolimus) in de Novo Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT01339468]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-27Completed
Impact of Lymphocyte Anti-metabolite Immunosuppressions on Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibody and Kidney Graft Outcome: Open-label, Multi-center, Single Arm, Phase 4 Trial (DoSAKOM) [NCT03794492]Phase 4169 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-31Active, not recruiting
Immunosuppressive Medications for Previous Participants in Clinical Trial NIS01 (ITN005CT, NCT00014911) [NCT01309022]0 participants Expanded AccessNo longer available
Phase II Trial of Low Toxicity GVHD Prevention and Enhanced Immune Recovery With Tacrolimus, Bortezomib and Thymoglobulin® TBT [NCT02877082]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Terminated
A Multi-Center, Phase II Trial of HLA-Mismatched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation With Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies [NCT04904588]Phase 2300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-30Recruiting
CD40-L Blockade for Prevention of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease [NCT03605927]Phase 145 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-15Completed
Ocular Micro-vascular Research Base on Functional Slip Lamp Biomicroscopy [NCT03747614]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-06-30Recruiting
Topical Tacrolimus 0.1% Ointment for Treatment of Cutaneous Crohn's Disease [NCT01233570]Phase 220 participants (Actual)InterventionalCompleted
A Randomized, Open-label,Controlled Phase II b Study to Demonstrate Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus Chronic Rejection After Lung Transplant [NCT04415476]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study did not proceed to IRB approval.)
Phase II Study of Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant for High-Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) [NCT01027000]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Organ Function Preservation by the Combination Treatment of the optImuM Dose of calcineUrin Inhibitor and Mycophenolate Sodium in Kidney Recipients: OPTIMUM Study [NCT01159080]Phase 4350 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-01Completed
A Phase I Study of Intensity Modulated Total Marrow Irradiation (IMTMI) in Addition to Fludarabine/Melphalan Conditioning for Allogeneic Transplantation for Advanced Hematologic Malignancies [NCT02333162]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-12-05Recruiting
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multi-center Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Tacrolimus in Stable Kidney Transplant Patients Converted From a Prograf® Based Immunosuppression Regimen to a Modified Release (MR) Tacrolimus Based Immu [NCT00282568]Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multi-center Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Tacrolimus in Stable Pediatric Liver Transplant Patients Converted From a Prograf® Based Immunosuppression Regimen to a Modified Release (MR) Ta [NCT00282256]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open Label, Drug Interaction Study of the Pharmacokinetics of ASP015K and Tacrolimus After Separate and Concomitant Administration to Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT01190670]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Optimizing Haploidentical Aplastic Anemia Transplantation (CHAMP) (BMT CTN 1502) [NCT02918292]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-03Completed
The Vienna Prograf and Endothelial Progenitor Cell Extension Study [NCT03751332]Phase 487 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Compare Efficacy and Safety Between Biologics + Methotrexate (MTX) vs Biologics + Tacrolimus (TAC) (Switched From Biologics + Methotrexate (MTX)) in the Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA): Randomized, Interventional, Open, Active Controlled, Parallel [NCT03737708]Phase 421 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-13Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Prograf (Tacrolimus)/MMF, Modified Release (MR) Tacrolimus/MMF and Neoral (Cyclosporine)/MMF in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT00064701]Phase 3668 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Pilot Study to Assess Engraftment Using CliniMACS TCR-α/β and CD19 Depleted Stem Cell Grafts From Haploidentical Donors for Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Transplantation (HSCT) in Patients With Relapsed Lymphoma [NCT02652468]11 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-10Completed
A Phase I Trial of Ruxolitinib Combined With Tacrolimus and Sirolimus as Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGVHD) Prophylaxis During Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Myelofibrosis [NCT02528877]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to The study design was revised so a new protocol will be opened.)
Evaluation Dose Adjustments in Kidney Transplant Patients on Immediate Release and Extended Release Tacrolimus [NCT03760263]Phase 454 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-16Recruiting
Clinical Outcome of de Novo Everolimus-based Immunosuppressive Therapy for Renal Transplantation Using Rituximab Induction [NCT01312064]Phase 42 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty collecting)
Research Institute of Nephrology, Jinling Hospital [NCT01161459]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Expanded Access Protocol Thymus Transplantation for Immunodeficiency, Hematologic Malignancies, and Autoimmune Disease Related to Poor Thymic Function [NCT02274662]0 participants Expanded AccessApproved for marketing
Feasibility, Efficacy And Safety Of De Novo Extended-Release Tacrolimus Following Liver Transplantation [NCT05242315]Phase 494 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-15Recruiting
Polyomavirus BK Nephropathy After Renal Transplantation: Randomized Clinical Trial to Demonstrate That Switching to mTOR Inhibitor is More Effective Than a Reduction of Immunosuppressive Therapy [NCT01289301]Phase 4124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-10-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase II, Open Label, Parallel Group, Multi-center Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Adult Subjects Undergoing Primary Allograft Transplantation Receiving an Advagraf® or Prograf® Based Immunosuppressive Regimen, Including a Long-te [NCT01332201]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
Multicenter Study of the Safety and Bioequivalence of Par's Pimecrolimus Cream, 1% and RLD Elidel® (Pimecrolimus Cream, 1%) and Compare Both Active Treatments to a Vehicle Control in Treatment of Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis [NCT03297502]Phase 3582 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of a 0.1% Tacrolimus Nasal Ointment as a Treatment for Epistaxis in Hemorrhagic Hereditary Telangiectasia (HHT) - A Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Trial [NCT03152019]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-22Completed
A Multicenter, Two Arm, Randomized, Open Label Clinical Study Investigating Renal Function in an Advagraf® Based Immunosuppressive Regimen With or Without Sirolimus in Kidney Transplant Patients [NCT01363752]Phase 4853 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-08Completed
A Six-month, Prospective, Single-center, Pilot Study Determining the Pharmacokinetics and Effectiveness of Twice-daily Tacolimus and Everolimus Regimen Convert to Once-daily Tacrolimus and Everolimus Regimen in Liver Transplant Patients [NCT03256864]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Allogeneic Islet Cells Transplanted Into the Omentum [NCT02821026]Phase 1/Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
Alterations in Cognitive Function and Cerebral Blood Flow After Conversion From Immediate Release Tacrolimus to Slow Release Envarsus [NCT03703154]30 participants (Actual)Observational2018-10-25Completed
Malar Bags After Lower Lid Blepharoplasty and Facelift: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Tacrolimus [NCT03715387]Phase 2/Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-10Recruiting
A Randomized Phase Ⅱ, Trial With Sirolimus-containing Versus mTOR-inhibitor Free Immunosuppression in Patients Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Exceeding Milan Criteria [NCT01374750]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Vorinostat With Gemcitabine/Clofarabine/Busulfan for Allogeneic Transplantation for Aggressive Lymphomas [NCT04220008]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-01Not yet recruiting
Study of the Cellular Diffusion of Tacrolimus Across the Membrane of Mononuclear Cells [NCT03654794]26 participants (Actual)Observational2013-10-24Completed
[NCT02336854]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-12Completed
Prospective Study of Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Using Acellular Porcine Cornea [NCT03105466]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-02-29Recruiting
Induction of Response and Remission of Vedolizumab Monotherapy Vs Combination Therapy With Tacrolimus in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis [NCT02954159]Phase 34 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-18Terminated(stopped due to insufficient enrollment)
Phase 1/2 Study of Carfilzomib for the Prevention of Relapse and Graft-versus-host Disease in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for High-risk Hematologic Malignancies [NCT02145403]Phase 1/Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Thymus Transplantation in Complete DiGeorge Anomaly, IND#9836 [NCT01220531]0 participants Expanded AccessApproved for marketing
A Phase II Trial of Non-Myeloablative Conditioning and Transplantation of Partially HLA-Mismatched/Haploidentical Related or Matched Unrelated Bone Marrow for Patients With Refractory Severe Aplastic Anemia and Other Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes [NCT02224872]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
The Effect of Cyclosporine A Versus Tacrolimus on the Response to Antiviral Treatment After HCV Genotype -4 Recurrence in Recipients of Living Donor Liver Transplantation [NCT03665766]126 participants (Actual)Observational2014-05-15Completed
Diabetogenicity of Cyclosporine and Tacrolimus [NCT00766909]Phase 418 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Biomarkers Predicting Successful Tacrolimus Withdrawal and Everolimus (Zortress) Monotherapy Early After Liver Transplantation [NCT02736227]28 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Two Variants of Prolonged - Released Tacrolimus (Advagraf vs. Envarsus ) in Patients After Liver Transplantation : Single Center Randomised Control Trial [NCT03603548]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-09Recruiting
Comparison of Medication Adherence Between Once Daily Tacrolimus (Advagraf®) and Twice Daily Tacrolimus (Prograf®) Administration in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients - a Randomized Study [NCT01334333]Phase 446 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-11Completed
To Evaluate Prevention Effect Of Everolimus and Low-dose Tacrolimus in Comparison With Standard-dose Tacrolimus Therapy With Mycophenolic Acid on the New Onset Diabetes Mellitus After Transplantation in the Renal Allograft Recipients [NCT02036554]Phase 4234 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-03-31Recruiting
Phase II Study to Investigate the Properties of Topical Twice Daily Doses of 2.5% and 5% Cis-urocanic Acid in Comparison to Active Comparator 0.1% Protopic® for up to 28 Days in Patients With Moderate or Severe Atopic Dermatitis [NCT01320579]Phase 2159 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
A 12-Month, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase IIA Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Siplizumab in Combination With Belatacept and MPA Compared to Standard of Care Immunosuppression in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients (ASCEND) [NCT05669001]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Not yet recruiting
Everolimus in Association With Very Low-dose Tacrolimus Versus Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium With Low-dose Tacrolimus in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients - A Prospective Single Center Study [NCT02084446]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
Open Label, Multi-center, Randomized Study to Compare of Tacrolimus and Steroids in Combination With Mycophenolate Mofetil or Without Mycophenolate Mofetil in Liver Transplantation With Hepatitis B Virus(HBsAg) Positive [NCT02075242]Phase 4170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-01-31Recruiting
Envarsus XR in African American Renal Transplant Recipients [NCT02956005]18 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Terminated(stopped due to IIS - PI left the institution. Subjects just followed to study completion)
Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Kidney Transplant Recipients With Selected Unresectable or Metastatic Cancers [NCT03816332]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-08Active, not recruiting
A Pilot Randomized Study to Assess the Effect and Safety Profile of Thymoglobulin® in Primary Cardiac Transplant Recipients: A 12-month, Single Center, Randomized, Open-label Study of Efficacy Comparing Immediate Treatment With and Without Thymoglobulin® [NCT03292861]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-13Enrolling by invitation
Open-Label, 1-Sequence, 2-Period, Multiple Oral Dose Phase 1 Study to Evaluate Effect of IN-A001 on Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Healthy Volunteers [NCT05353010]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-01Not yet recruiting
Shortened-duration Tacrolimus Following Nonmyeloablative, Related Donor BMT With High-dose Posttransplantation Cyclophosphamide [NCT01342289]Phase 1127 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
CD34+ Stem Cell Selection for Patients Receiving a Matched or Partially Matched Family or Unrelated Adult Donor Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant for Malignant Disease [NCT02061800]Phase 1/Phase 215 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-06-03Recruiting
The Effect of Everolimus on the Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Renal Transplant Patients, and the Effect of ABCB1、CYP3A4、CYP3A5、PORGenetic Polymorphism on the Two Drugs [NCT02077556]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
A Multicentre, Open-label, Pharmacokinetic Study of Modigraf® (Tacrolimus Granules) in de Novo Paediatric Allograft Recipients [NCT01371331]Phase 452 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-09Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study to Compare ATG or Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide to Calcineurin Inhibitor-Methotrexate as GVHD Prophylaxis After Myeloablative Unrelated Donor Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT03602898]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Insufficient funding)
Phase I Trial of Escalated Doses of Targeted Marrow Irradiation (TMI) Combined With Fludarabine and Busulfan as Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Transplantation [NCT02129582]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-05Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Induction Strategies Combined With Low Tacrolimus Exposure in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus or Sodium Mycophenolate [NCT01354301]Phase 4300 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of NK Cells Administration to Prevent Disease Relapse for Patient With High-Risk Myeloid Malignancies Undergoing Haploidentical Stem-Cell Transplantation [NCT01904136]Phase 1/Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-04-22Completed
A Prospective, Pilot Trial to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of Tacrolimus Extended-Release (Astagraf XL) in HLA Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT03194321]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-11Completed
A Partially-blinded, Active-controlled, Multicenter, Randomized Study Evaluating Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) of an Anti-CD40 Monoclonal Antibody, CFZ533, in de Novo and Maintenance Kidney Transplant Recipi [NCT03663335]Phase 2418 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-28Completed
A Phase 2a, Randomized, Open-Label, Active Control, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Bleselumab in Preventing the Recurrence of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT02921789]Phase 267 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-22Completed
Effect of Advagraf on Arterial Stiffness and on Vascular Fibrosis Plasma Markers on de Novo Renal Transplant Patients [NCT02154854]Phase 4104 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-07-31Recruiting
Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Using Related, HLA-Haploidentical Donors: A Pilot Trial of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) as the Donor Source [NCT02167958]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-11Completed
A Two Step Approach to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies-Increasing GVT Effects Without Increasing Toxicity [NCT03032783]Phase 263 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of Topical Application of Tacrolimus 0.03% (FK506) Eye Drops Versus Cyclosporine 0.05% Eye Drops in Treatment of Dry Eye in Secondary Sjogren Syndrome [NCT03865888]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-30Completed
Tacrolimus Monotherapy for Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy: A Randomized, Open, Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial [NCT03864250]124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-26Recruiting
DELTA Study Dutch Evaluation in Liver Transplantation To Assess the Efficacy of Cyclosporine A Microemulsion With C-2h Monitoring Versus Tacrolimus With Trough Monitoring in de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT00149994]Phase 4171 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Single Dose, Open Label, Bioequivalence Study of Tacrolimus Capsules 1 mg in Normal Healthy Male Subjects Under Fasting Condition [NCT01080456]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Single Dose, Open Label, Bioequivalence Study of Tacrolimus Capsules 5 mg in Normal Healthy Male Subjects Under Fed Condition [NCT01080534]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Investigating New Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving an Advagraf-Based Immunosuppressive Regimen With or Without Corticosteroids - A Multicenter, Two Arm, Randomized, Open Label Clinical Study [NCT01304836]Phase 41,166 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-22Completed
An Open-Label Phase 1 Study in Healthy Adult Subjects to Examine the Effects of Telaprevir on the Pharmacokinetics of Cyclosporine and Tacrolimus [NCT01038167]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Tacrolimus Plus Glucocorticoid for Severe Thrombocytopenia in Sjogren's Syndrome [NCT05694130]Phase 2/Phase 3110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-28Not yet recruiting
Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Using Related, HLA-Haploidentical Donors: A Phase II Trial of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) as the Donor Source [NCT01028716]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-19Terminated(stopped due to The study experienced lower accrual rates after the onset of COVID. Upon review of the collected data it was deemed that an adequate amount of subjects has been enrolled to date to assess study aims.)
Multi Center, Non-comparative, Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus Capsule(TacroBell SR Cap.) in Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT03749356]Phase 4141 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-05Completed
A Randomized, Single Dose, Open Label, Bioequivalence Study of Tacrolimus Capsules 5 mg in Normal Healthy Male Subjects Under Fasting Condition [NCT01080482]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Pilot Study for Comparative Clinical Trial on the Therapeutic Effect of Tacrolimus (Prograf Cap®) in Combination With Low Dose Corticosteroid in Adult Patient With Minimal Change Nephritic Syndrome [NCT01084980]Phase 2/Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Randomized Trial of Sirolimus-Based Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT00382109]Phase 3146 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A 2 Step Approach to Matched Related Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Hematological Malignancies-5+5 Dosing [NCT03712878]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-19Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Intensity Modulated Total Marrow Irradiation (IM-TMI) in Addition to Fludarabine/Busulfan Conditioning for Allogeneic Transplantation in High Risk AML and Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT03121014]Phase 238 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-04-24Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label, Comparative Evaluation of Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitors to Sirolimus Versus Continued Use of Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal Allograft Recipients [NCT00038948]Phase 3830 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
Effects on Insulin Secretion and Sensitivity of Two Different Formulations Tacrolimus - Prograf® and Advagraf® [NCT01092806]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
B-Lymphocyte Immunotherapy in Islet Transplantation: Single Subject Modification to Calcineurin-Inhibitor Based Immunosuppression for Initial Islet Graft (CIT-0501) [NCT01049633]0 participants Expanded AccessNo longer available
Reduced Intensity Myeloablative Total Body Irradiation and Thymoglobulin Followed by Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00709592]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-21Completed
[NCT02496494]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-09-30Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of 308-nm Excimer Lamp Combined With Tacrolimus vs Tacrolimus as Monotherapy in Treating Vitiligo on Children [NCT06035614]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-10-01Completed
Phase IIa Study of Addition of Itacitinib With Tacrolimus/Sirolimus Regimen for GVHD Prophylaxis in Fludarabine and Melphalan Non-Myeloablative Conditioning Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Leukemias, MDS or MF [NCT04339101]Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-11Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2 Pilot, Multicenter, Single Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of GSK1070806 Plus Standard of Care for the Prevention of Delayed Graft Function in Adult Subjects After Renal Transplantation [NCT02723786]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-27Terminated(stopped due to Lack of efficacy)
Phase 1 Trial for Patients With Advanced Hematologic Malignancies Undergoing Reduced Intensity Allogeneic HCT With a T-cell Depleted Graft With Infusion of Conventional T-cells and Regulatory T-cells [NCT05088356]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-07Recruiting
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Treosulfan-Based Conditioning for the Treatment of Bone Marrow Failure Diseases [NCT04965597]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-19Recruiting
A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Pilot Study to Investigate Medication Adherence & Patient Reported Symptom Occurrence & Interference w/ Daily Life Comparing Envarsus XR® & Immediate Release Tacrolimus in Adult Renal Transplant Recipien [NCT03979365]Phase 4240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-18Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Combination of Hyper-CVAD and Dasatinib (NSC-732517) With or Without Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With Philadelphia (Ph) Chromosome Positive and/or BCR-ABL Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) (A BMT Study) [NCT00792948]Phase 297 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-01Active, not recruiting
Optimizing Immunosuppression Drug Dosing Via Phenotypic Precision Medicine [NCT03527238]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-21Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Cyclosporine-based and Switching Cyclosporine to Tacrolimus of Two Forms-based Immunosuppressive Therapy in Renal Transplant (KTx) Recipients [NCT02268201]Phase 417 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-23Terminated(stopped due to Due to difficulty enrolling patients)
Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes [NCT00434811]Phase 348 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Effectiveness of Narrow-band Ultraviolet B Combined With Topical Tacrolimus 0.03% in Treatment of Patients With Vitiligo [NCT03199664]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-09-01Recruiting
Study to Compare Once-daily Extended Release Tacrolimus Versus Twice-daily Immediate Release Tacrolimus Following Renal Allograft Failure to Reduce the Risk of Allosensitisation [NCT03689075]Phase 464 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-01Recruiting
Single-Arm, Open Label, Interventional Phase II Clinical Trial Evaluating MGTA-456 in Patients With High-Risk Malignancy [NCT03674411]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-02Active, not recruiting
Study on the Application of Hyperspectral Imaging Technique in the Treatment of TAC [NCT05797038]40 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-04-25Not yet recruiting
A Three-Part Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Potential Drug Interactions Between ALXN2050 and Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus, and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Healthy Adult Participants [NCT05202145]Phase 161 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-11Completed
Belatacept in De Novo Heart Transplantation - Pilot Study [NCT04477629]Phase 212 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-06Recruiting
Phase II Study of Clofarabine and High-Dose Melphalan Conditioning Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplasia or Acute Leukemia in Remission [NCT01885689]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-10Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Dasatinib (Sprycel®) (NSC #732517) as Primary Therapy Followed by Transplantation for Adults >/= 18 Years With Newly Diagnosed Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia by CALGB, ECOG and SWOG [NCT01256398]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-14Completed
A Bioanalytical Method Cross-validation Study to Compare the Finger Prick Whole Blood MITRA Assay Method With the Established Venepuncture Whole Blood Method for Quantitative Determination of Tacrolimus Blood Concentrations in Transplant Patients [NCT03465969]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-20Completed
A Partially Blinded, Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Study Evaluating Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Oral Sotrastaurin Plus Standard or Reduced Exposure Tacrolimus vs. Mycophenolic Acid Plus Tacrolimus in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients [NCT01064791]Phase 2298 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A Single Center, Single Arm, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Modified Release, ADVAGRAF® After Treatment With a Tacrolimus in New Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT03423225]Phase 431 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-22Completed
A Pilot Study of Reduced Intensity HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Advanced Myelofibrosis [NCT03426969]Early Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-31Completed
Prospective Multicenter Randomized Openlabel Study to Evaluate the Benefit on Renal Function at 12months Post-transplantation of Immunosuppressive Treatment With Withdrawal of Calcineurin Inhibitor at 3months and Combining Mycophenolate Sodium-Everolimus [NCT02334488]Phase 3329 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-11Completed
Prospective, Randomized 2 x 2 Factorial Trial of Rabbit Anti-thymocyte Globulin Induction (Single vs. Alternate Day Administration) at Renal Transplantation, With Delayed Calcineurin-inhibitor Withdrawal vs. Minimization [NCT00556933]Phase 4180 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-01Completed
Immunotherapy of the Paraneoplastic Syndromes [NCT00378326]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
A Long-term Follow-up of Adult Kidney and Liver Allograft Recipients Previously Enrolled Into a Tacrolimus (Advagraf) Trial. A Multicentre Non-interventional Post Authorization Study (PAS) [NCT02057484]2,300 participants (Actual)Observational2014-03-03Completed
Risk of QT-prolongation and Torsade de Pointes in Patients Treated With Acute Medication in a University Hospital [NCT02068170]178 participants (Actual)Observational2014-02-28Completed
Phase II Open-Label Trial of Tacrolimus/Methotrexate and Tocilizumab for the Prevention of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT02206035]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
A Phase 2/3, Prospective, Randomized, Multi-center, Open-Label, Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy & Safety of Cellular Immunotherapy With MDR-102 for Induction of Immune Quiescence™in Recipients of HLA-mismatched, LD Kidney Transplants [NCT03605654]Phase 2/Phase 3172 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-12-31Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Placebo-controlled Phase II Trial of Irradiated, Adenovirus Vector Transferred GM-CSF Secreting Autologous Leukemia Cell Vaccination (GVAX) Versus Placebo Vaccination in Patients With Advanced MDS/AML After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell [NCT01773395]Phase 2123 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-08Terminated(stopped due to Recommendation by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board due to efficacy concerns)
A Phase II, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Prochymal® (Ex-vivo Cultured Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells) For the Treatment of Acute GVHD in Patients Who Receive Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00136903]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-27Completed
Immunosuppression With Antithymocyte Globulin, Rituximab, Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Sirolimus, Followed by Withdrawal of Immunosuppression, in Living-donor Renal Transplant Recipients [NCT01318915]Early Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-25Terminated(stopped due to The stopping rule for incidence of acute rejection was met.)
Calcineurin-Sparing in a Steroid-free Maintenance Immunosuppression Protocol After Kidney Transplantation [NCT01062555]Phase 1/Phase 2527 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-01Completed
A Randomized Trial Comparing Rectal Indomethacin Alone Versus a Combination of Rectal Indomethacin and Oral Tacrolimus for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis Prophylaxis [NCT05252754]Phase 34,874 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-18Recruiting
TAILOR Study: Tacrolimus Versus Mycophenolate for Autolmmune Hepatitis Patients With incompLete Response On First Line Therapy: a Randomized Trial [NCT05221411]Phase 486 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-19Recruiting
High-dose Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide as Graft Versus-host Disease Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT02294552]Phase 2200 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
Comparative Efficacy of Tacrolimus 0.1% and Clobetasol Propionate 0.05% in the Treatment of Alopecia Areata [NCT05885269]Phase 170 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-11-01Completed
Pilot Study Comparing Early Conversion to Extended-Release Tacrolimus (ENVARSUS XR) to Immediate-Release Tacrolimus in Lung Transplant Recipients [NCT04420195]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-23Completed
A Pilot Study to Demonstrate Efficacy and Safety of Aerosol Liposomal Cyclosporine (L-CsA) in the Treatment of Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome After Lung Transplantation [NCT01650545]Phase 1/Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Cyclosporine in Hepatitis C Infection Viral Clearance Following Liver Transplantation [NCT00821587]Phase 439 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
Assessment of the Pharmacokinetic Profile of Tacrolimus Medications in Liver Transplant Patients [NCT05744635]110 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-05-10Recruiting
Influence of Recipient Cytochrome P450 3A5 Polymorphism on the Metabolism of Prolonged Release Tacrolimus Administered de Novo After Renal Transplantation [NCT02311010]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-01-31Active, not recruiting
Open Label Randomized Study of Thymoglobulin Versus Daclizumab Induction Therapies for the Reduction of Acute Rejection in Live Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients With a Positive Crossmatch [NCT00275509]Phase 356 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Specified Drug Use-Results Survey of Graceptor® Capsules 0.5mg, 1 mg, and 5 mg in Kidney Transplant Patients [NCT02160054]289 participants (Actual)Observational2013-11-15Completed
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Tacrolimus in Stable Liver Transplant Patients Converted From a Prograf® Based Immunosuppression Regimen to a Modified Release (MR) Tacrolimus B [NCT00282243]Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
Randomized Study of Atorvastatin Prophylaxis as a Supplement to Standard of Care Prophylaxis to Prevent Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation From Matched Unrelated Donors [NCT03066466]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-10Withdrawn(stopped due to No participants were enrolled)
Comparitive Study Between Uvb Phototherapy Alone and Uvb Photothearpy With Topical 0.03% Tacrolimus for Treatment of Vitiligo [NCT05577637]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-01Completed
Anti-CD22 Immunoconjugate Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (CMC-544) Added to Fludarabine, Bendamustine and Rituximab and Allogeneic Transplantation for CD22 Positive-Lymphoid Malignancies [NCT01664910]Phase 1/Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-29Completed
Multi-Institutional Prospective Pilot Study of Lupron to Enhance Lymphocyte Immune Reconstitution Following Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation in Post-Pubertal Children and Adults With Molecular Imaging Evaluation [NCT01338987]Phase 276 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-19Completed
Assessment of Renal Tubular Injury and Transplant Outcomes in Cardiac Recipients Converting From Immediate Release Tacrolimus to Extended Release Tacrolimus. [NCT04917718]Phase 442 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-16Recruiting
Radiation- and Alkylator-free Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Bone Marrow Failure Due to Dyskeratosis Congenita / Telomere Disease [NCT01659606]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-07-31Active, not recruiting
Reduce Intensity Conditioning (RIC) Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (Allo HSCT) for Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: A Pilot Study [NCT04205240]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-22Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual)
OPTIMIZATION of the Dose of tacroliMUS by Bayesian Prediction in Renal Transplant Patients Including Pharmacogenetic Variables [NCT03465410]Phase 496 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-21Completed
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of De Novo Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation [NCT03388008]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-17Completed
Tacrolimus Disposition in Pediatric Transplantation: Influence of Age, Genetic Polymorphisms, Intestinal and Hepatic Relative Contribution on Pharmacokinetics, in Relationship With Clinical Outcomes [NCT02064777]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-07-31Recruiting
Peritransplant Deoxyspergualin in Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes (CIT-03) [NCT00434850]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Hepatitis C in Renal Transplant Recipients - Safety and Efficacy of a Conversion of Immunosuppression to High-dose Cyclosporine A and Its Impact on Hepatitis C Virus-replication, Parameters of Liver Function and Glucose Tolerance. An Open Label Trial. [NCT02108301]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-12-31Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Rituximab Therapeutic Response Versus Conventional Treatment in the Management of Refractory Nephrotic Syndrome [NCT05553496]Phase 2/Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-25Not yet recruiting
Random, Open, Control and Monocentric Clinical Research on Tacrolimus Monotherapy for Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy (IMN) [NCT03549663]108 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-04Recruiting
Evaluation of Acute Rejection Rates in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients Following Thymoglobulin Induction, CNI-free, Nulojix (Belatacept)-Based Immunosuppression [NCT02137239]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
A Cohort Study in Liver Transplant Patients Converted From a Tacrolimus Twice a Day (Prograf®) to Tacrolimus Once a Day (Advagraf®). French, Multisite, Observational Study [NCT02143479]398 participants (Actual)Observational2014-06-18Completed
A Randomized Pilot Study of Treatment for Subclinical Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT03380936]Early Phase 14 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-17Terminated(stopped due to Slower than expected recruitment rate)
Clinical and Laboratory Evaluation of Acute Rejection, Myocyte Growth, Repair, and Oxidative Stress Following de Novo Cardiac Transplant: A Comparison Between Tacrolimus- and Cyclosporine- Based Immunoprophylactic Regimens With MPA TDM [NCT00157014]Phase 3111 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-10Completed
To Understand the Impact of Immunosuppression Using Once-per-day Envarsus XR on the Effect of Total Tacrolimus Dose/Trough Level Ratio on Renal Function (eGFR) in Kidney Transplantation [NCT03511560]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-26Active, not recruiting
A Phase IV, Single Center Pilot Study Using Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) Induction Combined With Prednisone-Free, Calcineurin-Inhibitor-Free Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplantation [NCT00166712]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Study stopped due to lack of efficacy & funding.)
Double-blind, Randomized Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial for the Efficacy and Safety of a Calcineurin Inhibitor, Tacrolimus(Prograf Cap®) in Patients With Non-nephrotic Albuminuric, Normotensive IgA Nephropathy [NCT01224028]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Tacrolimus in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Shown Unsuccessful Response Against Methotrexate: Non-comparative, Single Arm, Multi-center, Phase 4 Study [NCT01224418]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
An Open Label, Two Way Crossover, Balanced, Single Dose, Comparative Evaluation of Relative Bioavailability of Tacrolimus Capsules 5 mg With That of 'Prograf' Capsules 5 mg in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions. [NCT01131988]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Compare the Development of Liver Fibrosis at 12 Months After Transplantation for Hepatitis C Cirrhosis in Patients Receiving Either Cyclosporine Microemulsion or Tacrolimus [NCT00260208]Phase 4361 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Study was prematurely terminated due to poor recruitment.)
Pilot Study of Allogeneic/Syngeneic Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With High-Risk and Recurrent Pediatric Sarcomas [NCT00043979]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-19Completed
A Phase II Trial of Sequential Chemotherapy, Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec, STI571) (NSC # 716051), and Transplantation for Adults With Newly Diagnosed Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia by the CALGB and SWOG [NCT00039377]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-04-30Completed
A 12-Month, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Dose Escalation Study Evaluating Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of an Anti-CD2 Monoclonal Antibody, TCD601(Siplizumab) Compared to Anti-thymocyte Globulin (rATG), as In [NCT04311632]Phase 224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-26Recruiting
Matched Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation With a Conditioning Regimen of Targeted Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, and Thymoglobulin [NCT00611351]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-07Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind Double Dummy, Parallel Control and Multi-center Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Capsules in Treatment of Lupus Nephritis With Leflunomide Tablets [NCT01342016]Phase 384 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Due to safety concern of active control drug)
Pre-transplant Pharmacokinetics as a Predictor of the Tacrolimus Dose Requirement Post Renal Transplantation [NCT00297310]Phase 489 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Comparative FK506 Drug Levels of Once Daily Advagraf in First Nations and Caucasian Patients With Liver Transplants [NCT04237246]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
Phase 2a Study of Adding Ruxolitinib With Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Regimen for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Myeloablative Conditioning Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients [NCT06128070]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-14Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing a Calcineurin Inhibitor-free Graft-versus-host Disease Prophylaxis Regimen With Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide and Abatacept to Standard of Care [NCT03680092]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-26Active, not recruiting
Conversion From Immediate Release Tacrolimus to Envarsus XR® in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Recipients: Assessment of Functional, Safety and Quality of Life Outcomes (CIRTEN SPK) [NCT03769298]Phase 2/Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-27Recruiting
Population Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus for Optimal Dose in Patients With Nephrotic Syndrome [NCT04045171]200 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-08-10Not yet recruiting
A Multi-Center, Phase 3, Randomized Trial of Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD) Versus HLA-Haploidentical Related (Haplo) Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults (AYA) With Acute Leukemia or Myelodysplastic [NCT05457556]Phase 3435 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-15Recruiting
Itacitinib to Prevent Graft Versus Host Disease [NCT04859946]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-11Recruiting
Partially HLA-Mismatched Related Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using Killer Immunoglobulin Receptor and Human Leukocyte Antigen Based Donor Selection [NCT02880293]44 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-23Completed
An Open Label, Two Way Crossover, Balanced, Single Dose, Comparative Evaluation of Relative Bioavailability of Tacrolimus Capsules 5 mg With That of 'Prograf' Capsules 5 mg in Healthy Subjects Under Non-fasting Conditions. [NCT01132027]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Tacrolimus Treatment for Refractory Autoimmune Cytopenia [NCT03918265]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-04Recruiting
Sirolimus-based Immunosuppression Treatment Regimen for Liver Transplantation: A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial in Liver Transplant Recipients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT03500848]Phase 2/Phase 3130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-01Not yet recruiting
A Long-term, Open-label, Non-comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Modigraf® Based Immunosuppression Regimen in Paediatric Solid Allograft Recipients [NCT01371344]Phase 447 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-24Terminated(stopped due to Trial will not complete until at least 2025 and evolution of immunosuppressant therapy has made it unlikely that patients will convert from Modigraf to Prograf.)
Extended Follow-Up After Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes (CIT-08) [NCT01369082]75 participants (Actual)Observational2011-05-31Completed
Comparison of the Cognitive and Motor Effects of Treatment Between an Immediate- and Extended-release Tacrolimus (Envarsus® XR) Based Immunosuppression Regimen in Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT03437577]Phase 1/Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-08Completed
A Phase II Study of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Zevalin, Fludarabine and Melphalan [NCT00577278]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-03Active, not recruiting
Low-dose Combination of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tacrolimus for Refractory Lupus Nephritis: a 12-month Prospective Study [NCT01203709]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
A Randomized Study of Once Daily Fludarabine-Clofarabine Versus Fludarabine Alone Combined With Intervenous Busulfan Followed by Allogeneic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT01471444]Phase 3256 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-02Completed
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Tacrolimus in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Shown Unsuccessful Response Against Methotrexate: Non-comparative, Single Arm, Multi-center, Phase 4 Study [NCT01224041]Phase 478 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Tacrolimus Versus Cyclophosphamide as Treatment for Diffuse Proliferative or Membranous Lupus Nephritis: Prospective Cohort Study [NCT01207297]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
Multicenter Registry of Pediatric Lupus Nephritis in China [NCT03791827]1,200 participants (Anticipated)Observational2018-12-01Recruiting
[NCT01309477]Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
JAK Inhibitor Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant for Patients With Primary and Secondary Myelofibrosis: A Prospective Study [NCT02251821]Phase 299 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-20Active, not recruiting
A Single-center,Randomized,Open-label,12 Months Study,2 Parallel Group to Compare the Efficacy of Everolimus Combination + Tacrolimus in Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy vs Tacrolimus + MMF in Renal Transplant Patients [NCT03415750]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Completed
Alterations in Cognitive Function and Cerebral Blood Flow After Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitors to Everolimus [NCT03413722]30 participants (Anticipated)Observational2018-02-01Recruiting
A Prospective, Open Label, Pilot Study Comparing the Use of Low-target Advagraf With Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction Versus Conventional Target Advagraf With Basiliximab Induction in a Steroid-avoidance Immunosuppressive Protocol for de Novo Renal [NCT01265537]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-24Completed
Steroid Free Immunosuppression or Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization After Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Kidney Transplantation: Comparison With a Standard Quadruple Immunosuppressive Regimen [NCT01560572]Phase 4305 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
A Two Part, Phase 1/2, Safety, PK and PD Study of TOL101, an Anti-TCR Monoclonal Antibody for Prophylaxis of Acute Organ Rejection in Patients Receiving Renal Transplantation [NCT01154387]Phase 1/Phase 285 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Prograf (Tacrolimus)/MMF and Extended Release (XL) Tacrolimus /MMF and Steroid Withdraw in de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients. [NCT00720408]Phase 348 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Parallel Group Study Designed to Assess the Risk-benefit Balance of the Gradual Withdrawal of a Calcineurin Inhibitor (Tacrolimus) in Renal Transplant Patients Over 4 Years and Clinically Sele [NCT01292525]Phase 316 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Difficulties of recruitment)
Clinical Research of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Treatment of Children With Stage 4/M Neuroblastoma: A Prospective, Single-arm, Phase II, Multi-center Trial [NCT05303727]Phase 264 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-31Not yet recruiting
Long-Acting Tacrolimus for the Treatment of Resistant Lupus Nephritis [NCT01206569]Phase 42 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
A Long-term, Open-label, Non-comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Modigraf® Based Immunosuppression Regimen in De Novo Pediatric Allograft Liver and Kidney Transplantation Recipients [NCT05153915]Phase 456 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-30Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Pharmacokinetic (PK) Levels Before and After Conversion From Twice-daily Tacrolimus to Once-daily Extended-release Tacrolimus (LCPT) in Diabetic Transplant récipients [NCT04496401]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-28Completed
Budesonide in Liver Transplantation [NCT03315052]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Delay in IRB approval)
Comparison the Efficacy and Safety of 0.1% Tacrolimus Ointment With 0.1% Mometasone Furoate Cream in the Treatment of Adult Vitiligo: A Single Blinded Pilot Study [NCT01333410]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Comparative Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Versus Hydrocortisone in Treatment of Children With Atopic Dermatitis [NCT05324618]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-15Completed
Cyclophosphamide and Azathioprine vs Tacrolimus in Antisynthetase Syndrome-related Interstitial Lung Disease : Multicentric Randomized Phase III Trial [NCT03770663]Phase 376 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-05Recruiting
A 12-month, Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Study of Two Regimens of Anti-CD40 Monoclonal Antibody, CFZ533 vs. Standard of Care Control, in Adult de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients With [NCT03781414]Phase 2129 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-07Completed
Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model for Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy Treated With Tacrolimus [NCT05667922]50 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-06-30Not yet recruiting
Phase I/II Trial of Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Followed by Maintenance Therapy With Lenalidomide and Sirolimus in Patients With High-Risk Multiple Myeloma [NCT01303965]Phase 1/Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-07Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
Alloantibodies in Pediatric Heart Transplantation [NCT01005316]290 participants (Actual)Observational2010-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Inability to meet accrual goals within the funding period.)
Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Between Ezetimibe and Tacrolimus After Single Dose Administration in Healthy Subjects [NCT00621699]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Prograf® (Tacrolimus) as Secondary Intervention vs. Continuation of Cyclosporine in Patients at Risk for Chronic Renal Allograft Failure [NCT00637143]Phase 4107 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-04-30Completed
Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Parallel-Group Efficacy and Safety Study of Tacrolimus Immunosuppressive Therapy After Kidney Transplantation [NCT00717379]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Open Label Study Comparing the Effect of CellCept Combined With Low Dose Versus Standard Dose Tacrolimus, and Corticosteroids, on Kidney Function in Renal Transplantation Patients [NCT00758602]Phase 4210 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Two Step Approach to Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies [NCT02566304]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-11-13Active, not recruiting
The Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Kidney Transplantation From Chinese Donation After Citizen Death (DCD): A Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02561767]Phase 1/Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Not yet recruiting
Comparative, Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy of Tacrolimus 0.1% Ointment Versus Fluticasone 0.005% Ointment in Adult Patients Suffering From Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis and Presenting With So-called 'Red Face' L [NCT00690105]Phase 4577 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study Examining the Role and Effectiveness of Conversion to Sirolimus Versus CNI Reduction in Renal Transplant Patients With Prostate Cancer [NCT00922129]Phase 2/Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study did not start up as planned.)
Measuring Adherence to Topical Therapy in Children With Atopic Dermatitis and the Impact of a Return Visit [NCT00654355]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Maraviroc-Based Graft-Versus-Host-Disease Prophylaxis in HLA-Unrelated and HLA-Mismatched Related Donor Transplantation [NCT02799888]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-04-30Recruiting
A Multicenter Pilot Study of Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation With In-vivo T-cell Depletion to Evaluate the Role of NK Cells and KIR Mis-matches in Relapsed or Refractory High-risk Neuroblastoma. [NCT00874315]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to lack of accrual)
Post-Transplant Bendamustine (PT-BEN) for GVHD Prophylaxis [NCT04022239]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-13Recruiting
Very Low-dose Total Body Irradiation in Combination With Total Lymphoid Irradiation and Anti-Thymocyte Globulin to Improve Donor Engraftment in Patients Undergoing Non-Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT03734601]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-05Completed
Pilot Open-Label Study of Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib Given Peri-Transplant During Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) in Patients With Myelofibrosis [NCT02917096]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-13Completed
Specified Drug Use-results Survey for Long-term Use of Prograf Capsules in Patient With Interstitial Pneumonia Associated With Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis [NCT02159651]179 participants (Actual)Observational2014-04-01Completed
Islet Transplantation in Type I Diabetes With LEA29Y (Belatacept) Maintenance Therapy (CIT-04) [NCT00468403]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil as Post-Grafting Immunosuppression After Conditioning With Fludarabine and Low-Dose Total Body Irradiation for Recipients of HLA-Matched or Mis-Matched Family or Unrelated Donor HCT [NCT02178683]Phase 350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-11-30Recruiting
Tacrolimus Associated Tremors in Liver Transplant Recipients: a Randomized Open Label Trial Comparing De Novo Extended-release Once Daily (LCP-TAC) and Twice Daily Immediate-release (IR-TAC) Tacrolimus Formulations [NCT05089604]Phase 4124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase III Randomized, Multicenter Trial Comparing Sirolimus/Tacrolimus With Tacrolimus/Methotrexate as Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis After HLA-Matched, Related Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (BMT CTN #0402) [NCT00406393]Phase 3304 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Protection of Renal Function After Liver Transplant Using Everolimus Monotherapy as the Immunosuppression Regimen [NCT04063865]Phase 314 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-09Terminated(stopped due to Study was larger than expected and became a burden to faculty and staff resources.)
A Phase II Study of Cytokine Induced Memory-like NK Cell Adoptive Therapy After Haploidentical Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT02782546]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-30Recruiting
A Randomized, Prospective Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Conversion From Tacrolimus to Cyclosporine A After Early Initiation of Insulin Therapy in Patients With New-onset Diabetes Mellitus After Kidney Transplantation [NCT01268995]Phase 232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-09-30Terminated(stopped due to It was impossible to recruit the scheduled number of patients)
AT-1501-K209: BESTOW-EXTENSION: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Tegoprubart in Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT06126380]Phase 2132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-25Enrolling by invitation
MicroRNA Expression in Everolimus-based Versus Tacrolimus-based Maintenance Immunosuppressive Regimens in Kidney Transplantation [NCT02091973]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-06-30Recruiting
A Prospective, Multi-center, Single-arm, Interventional Study of Thymoglobuline® Induction Therapy in Adult Recipients of Donated After Cardiac Death Kidney Transplant in China [NCT03099122]Phase 4115 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-16Completed
Non-inferiority and Tolerance of Conversion From Prograf® to Advagraf® at D7 Versus D90 After Liver Transplantation [NCT02105155]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Topical Tacrolimus in Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis [NCT02456025]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-04-30Recruiting
Belatacept for the Management of Moderately Sensitized Patients at Risk for Delayed Graft Function (DGF) [NCT02130817]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-24Withdrawn(stopped due to Organ transplant criteria made recruitment difficult. Closed with IRB 10/09/2015.)
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study of Early-Use Long Acting Tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) in Lung Transplant Recipients [NCT04469842]Early Phase 148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-31Not yet recruiting
Off-label Use of Tacrolimus in Children With Henoch-Schönlein Purpura Nephritis: Effectiveness and Safety [NCT03222687]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-01Completed
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Multiple Myeloma: a Pilot Feasibility Study Using a Novel Protocol [NCT02447055]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Withdrawn
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Sarilumab Added to Non-MTX DMARDs or as Monotherapy in Japanese Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis [NCT02373202]Phase 391 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
A Phase I/II GVHD Prevention Trial Combining Pacritinib With Sirolimus-Based Immune Suppression [NCT02891603]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-08Completed
Treg Adoptive Therapy in Subclinical Inflammation in Kidney Transplantation (CTOT-21) [NCT02711826]Phase 1/Phase 214 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-09-20Completed
The Influence of Once-daily Versus Twice-daily Immunosuppressive Regimen on Drug Compliance in Patients After Renal Transplantation [NCT02251691]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-05-09Recruiting
A Multi-cohort, Randomized, Phase 2, Open-label Study to Assess the Preliminary Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of BIVV020 for Prevention and Treatment of Antibody-mediated Rejection in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients. [NCT05156710]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-09Recruiting
Cognitive Outcomes and Quality of Life in Stable Renal Transplant Patients Switched fromTwice-Daily Tacrolimus to Envarsus XR™ [NCT04838288]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-22Recruiting
A Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label, Pilot and Exploratory Study Investigating Safety and Efficacy in OPTIMIZEd Dosing of Advagraf® Kidney Transplantation in Asia. [NCT02161237]Phase 473 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-26Completed
Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Thalassemia Major [NCT03171831]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-04-01Recruiting
The Efficiency of Fractional-Laser Resurfacing Followed by Topical Tacrolimus 0.03% Cream Versus Topical Tacrolimus Alone in Stable Vitiligo: a Comparative Study [NCT03535051]27 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-01Completed
[NCT00189722]Phase 2160 participants (Actual)InterventionalCompleted
Haploidentical Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Transplantation: Clinical Trial and Laboratory Correlates Examining Checkpoint Immune Regulators' Expression [NCT03480360]Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-28Active, not recruiting
Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial [NCT00132691]Phase 4255 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Phase I/II Open-Label Study of ECT-001-Expanded Cord Blood Transplantation in Pediatric and Young Adult (<21year) Patients With High-Risk and Very High-Risk Myeloid Malignancies [NCT04990323]Phase 1/Phase 212 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-01Recruiting
Optima: Optimizing Prograf Therapy in Maintenance Allografts II [NCT00905515]Phase 463 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-08-31Completed
Phase 4, Randomized, Open-label, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Induction Agents, Alemtuzumab, Basiliximab or Rabbit Anti-thymocyte Globulin in Combination With Tacrolimus, MMF, and a Rapid Steroid Withdrawal in Renal [NCT00113269]Phase 4501 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Single Dose, Open Label, Bioequivalence Study of Tacrolimus Capsules 1 mg in Normal Healthy Male Subjects Under Fed Condition [NCT01080469]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Phase-I/II Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Venetoclax in Addition to Sequential Conditioning With Fludarabine / Amsacrine / Ara-C (FLAMSA) + Treosulfan for Allogeneic Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With MDS, CMML or sAML (FLAMSACla [NCT05807932]Phase 1/Phase 238 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-26Recruiting
A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing GVHD-Reduction Strategies for Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Transplantation (PBSCT) for Patients With Acute Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Selective Depletion of CD45RA+ Naïve T Cells (TND) vs. Post-Tr [NCT03970096]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-19Recruiting
Adalimumab vs. Conventional Immunosuppression for Uveitis Trial [NCT03828019]Phase 3222 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-16Active, not recruiting
An Open Label Phase II Randomized Trial of Topical Dexamethasone and Tacrolimus for the Treatment of Oral Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease [NCT00686855]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A 6-Month, Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Study Of 2 Dose Levels Of CP-690,550 Administered Concomitantly With IL-2 Receptor Antagonist Induction Therapy, Mycophenolate Mofetil And Corticosteroids Versus A Tacrolimus-Based Immun [NCT00106639]Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A Phase II Multicenter Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Campath-1H and Tacrolimus Followed By Immunosuppression Withdrawal in Liver Transplantation (ITN024ST) [NCT00105235]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Factors Affecting the Tacrolimus Blood Concentration and Its Impact on Transplant-related Outcomes in Pediatric HSCT Recipients: a Single-center Retrospective Study [NCT06080490]150 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-09-29Recruiting
A Phase II, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ex-Vivo Cultured Allogenic Mesenchymal Stem Cells For the Treatment of Extensive Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease [NCT00972660]Phase 252 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-09-30Enrolling by invitation
Study of Pharmacogenomic-Guided Tacrolimus Dosing and Monitoring in Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT03020589]Phase 497 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-06Completed
A Randomized, Open Label Study Comparing the Effect of CellCept With Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Tacrolimus and a Corticosteroid-sparing Regimen Versus Fixed Dose CellCept, Tacrolimus and Corticosteroids Maintained up to 6 Months, on Acute Rejection and [NCT00545402]Phase 4180 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
T-Cell or Natural Killer (NK) Cell Adback in Patients With Lymphoid Malignancies Receiving Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation With Campath-IH Containing Conditioning Regimens [NCT00536978]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Prospective Study Comparing Brand and Generic Immunosuppression on Transplant Outcomes, Adherence, & Immune Response [NCT02866682]Phase 4176 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-01Completed
Open Randomized Multi-Center Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Low Molecular Weight Sulfated Dextran (LMW-SD) in Islet Transplantation After Kidney Transplantation (CIT-01B) [NCT00790439]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Due to funding limitations)
Phase I/II Study of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Hematologic Diseases Using Haploidentical Family Donors and Sub-Myeloablative Conditioning With Campath 1H [NCT00058825]Phase 1/Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual due to practice changes meant study would take too long to finish)
A Randomized, Open-label, Comparative Evaluation of Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitors to Sirolimus Versus Continued Use of Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal Allograft Recipient [NCT00452361]Phase 431 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Terminated
A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Parallel-Group Study of Belatacept (BMS-224818)-Based Corticosteroid-Free Regimens in Renal Transplant [NCT00455013]Phase 293 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Randomized Open-Label Study To Compare The Safety And Efficacy Of Conversion From A Calcineurin Inhibitor To Sirolimus Vs Continued Use Of A Calcineurin Inhibitor In Heart Transplant Recipients With Mild-Moderate Impaired Renal Function [NCT00369382]Phase 4121 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Depletion Induction With Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin, Followed by Two Approaches Toward Monotherapy Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT00076570]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Comparative Clinical Study of Reduced Dose of Tacrolimus and Standard Dose of Mycophenolate Mofetil vs. Conventional Dose of Tacrolimus and Reduced Dose of Mycophenolate Mofetil in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients [NCT03968588]Phase 4108 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-29Completed
Pilot Study Using Donor Stem Cells and Campath-1H to Induce Renal Transplant Tolerance (ITN022ST) [NCT00183248]Phase 1/Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Pharmacokinetics of Sirolimus and Tacrolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients With Early Nephrotoxicity and/or Hypertension Due to Tacrolimus [NCT01709136]Phase 2/Phase 33 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Sirolimus usage discontinued since black box warning)
A Multicenter Pilot Study to Determine the Pharmacokinetics of Astagraf XL, Prograf and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Renal Transplant Candidates Who Have Undergone Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy [NCT02221583]Phase 426 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Vitiligo and the Koebner Phenomenon (Model of Vitiligo Induction and Therapy: a Clinical and Immunological Analysis) [NCT01082393]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-16Completed
Prospective Donor-specific Cellular Alloresponse Assessment for Immunosuppression Minimization in de Novo Renal Transplantation [NCT02540395]184 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
Corneal Densitometry Changes With Adenoviral Keratoconjunctivitis Sub Epithelial Infiltrates [NCT04267991]63 participants (Actual)Observational2018-04-01Completed
A Phase 3 Pilot Study to Describe the Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Patients Undergoing Primary Liver Donor Liver Transplantation Treated With Prograf Injection and Modified Release Tacrolimus Based Immunosuppressive Regimen [NCT00909571]Phase 310 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Targeting Inflammation and Alloimmunity in Heart Transplant Recipients With Tocilizumab (RTB-004) [NCT03644667]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-20Recruiting
Prospective Randomized Trial to Compare a Twice Daily to a Once Daily Administration of the Tacrolimus in Lung Transplanted Patients [NCT00930241]Phase 325 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Terminated(stopped due to logistic reasons (insufficient funding, technical problems with MEMS))
Evaluation of Incidence of Non Adherence to Treatment With Once-daily Formulation of Tacrolimus (ADVAGRAF) in Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT02805842]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-08-31Not yet recruiting
[NCT02794610]10 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-31Recruiting
A Pilot, Open Single Centre, Prospective, Parallel Trail to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressive Regimen Without Calcineurin Inhibitors and Steroids After Induction of Anti-CD52 and Anti-TNF-α Monoclonal Antibodies in Kidney Transplant Re [NCT02711202]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Tacrolimus (FK506) P-III, Open-label Study in Severe Refractory Ulcerative Colitis Patients or Patients Who Attended and Received Placebo in F506-CL-1107 Study [NCT00643071]Phase 332 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Development and Validation of New LC-MS/MS Method for Determination of Unbound Tacrolimus in Plasma in CYP3A5 Expressors and Non-Expressors [NCT04657562]380 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2020-08-01Recruiting
Multi Center Randomized Open-label Phase IV Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety After Conversion to TacroBell SR Capsule or TacroBell Capsule in Renal Transplant Patients Undergoing Maintenance Therapy With Reference Tacrolimus [NCT04224350]Phase 4184 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-17Recruiting
A Two-Cohort, Randomised Sequence, Cross-over, Open-label Study to Assess the Effect of a Single Dose of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate (SZC) on the Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporin in Healthy Subjects [NCT04788641]Phase 162 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-30Completed
Comparison of Tacrolimus 0.1% and Clobetasol 0.05% in the Management of Symptomatic Oral Lichen Planus- A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial in Sri Lanka [NCT02744378]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Investigator Blinded Study of Protopic (Tacrolimus) Ointment Vs. Elidel (Pimecrolimus) Cream in Pediatric Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis [NCT00666159]Phase 4226 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
Sequential, Related Donor Partial Liver Transplantation Followed by Bone Marrow Transplantation for Fibrolamellar or Non-fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Including Fibrolamellar HCC [NCT02702960]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to This study was withdrawn due to lack of necessary resources from the liver transplant surgical group.)
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Study to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of FK506MR vs Prograf® in Stable Liver Transplantation Patients and a Pharmacokinetics Study [NCT00619398]Phase 3172 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Planned Transition To Sirolimus-Based Therapy Versus Continued Tacrolimus-Based Therapy In Renal Allograft Recipients [NCT00895583]Phase 4254 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
A 12-week, Exploratory, Non-comparative, Multi-centre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 0.1% Tacrolimus Ointment Administered in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis [NCT00523952]Phase 3303 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Single Center Pilot Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Adding Itacitinib to Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide as Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis After Reduced Intensity Conditioning Matched Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation With Peripheral B [NCT05364762]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-23Recruiting
Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Versus Tacrolimus and Sirolimus vs. Neoral and Sirolimus Used in Combination in Cadaver and Non-HLA Identical Living Related Kidney Transplants [NCT00681213]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-05-31Completed
Validation of Population Pharmacokinetic Model Derived From Healthy Volunteer in Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT02808065]40 participants (Anticipated)Observational2016-05-31Recruiting
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Thalassemia Major: A Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study [NCT04009525]Phase 4800 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-01Recruiting
An Open, Multicentre, Randomised, Parallel Group Pilot-Study to Compare Safety and Efficacy of Discontinuation of Mycophenolate Mofetil From a Tacrolimus/MMF/Steroid Triple Regimen Following Kidney Transplantation [NCT00693381]Phase 3152 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
A Historically-controlled, Multi-center Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Tacrolimus (Prograf Capsule, Prograf Injection) and Methotrexate Combination Therapy for Prevention of GVHD in Patients Who Received Peripheral Hematopoietic Stem Cell Tran [NCT02660684]Phase 439 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Double-Blind Study of Early Corticosteroid Cessation vs. Long Term Corticosteroid Therapy With Prograf and CellCept in Primary Renal Transplant Patients [NCT00650468]Phase 4397 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-11-30Completed
Pharmacokinetic Study to Rectal and Sublingual Administration of Tacrolimus in Future Kidney Transplant Patients [NCT00987103]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-09-30Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Multicenter Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of 0.1% Tacrolimus Ointment in the Treatment of Chronic Allergic Contact Dermatitis [NCT00667056]Phase 498 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Multi-Institutional Pilot Study of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Malignant Neuro-Epithelial and Other Solid Tumors [NCT02653196]Early Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Terminated(stopped due to The Principal Investigator left the institution.)
Identification of Drug-drug Interaction Between Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Healthy Adults [NCT02743247]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
A Comparison of Effects of Short-Term Steady State Low Dose Exposure of Extended Release (Advagraf®) and Immediate Release (Prograf®) Formulations of Tacrolimus on Renal Perfusion and Function in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT01681134]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Rasburicase to Prevent Graft -Versus-Host Disease [NCT00513474]Phase 146 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
An Open-label Clinical Trial of the Combination Treatment of Tacrolimus and Corticosteroid in Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis Patients With Interstitial Pneumonitis, With Comparison Against Corticosteroid-treated Historical Controls [NCT00504348]Phase 2/Phase 325 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
Phase I/II Study of Pentostatin Combined With Tacrolimus and Mini-Methotrexate for GVHD Prevention After Matched-Unrelated Donor Blood and Marrow Transplantation [NCT00506922]Phase 1/Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Prograf® (Tacrolimus)/ Myfortic® and Advagraf® (Extended Release Tacrolimus) / Myfortic® in de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT01018914]Phase 444 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Infusion of Expanded Cord Blood T Cells Following Cord Blood Transplantation [NCT00972101]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Development of other studies led to termination without recruitment.)
A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Group, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Alefacept in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT00543569]Phase 2323 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Research Institute of Nephrology, Jinling Hospital, [NCT01056237]206 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
French Multicentre Observational Study of a Prospective Cohort of Renal Transplant Patients Converted From the Twice Per Day Form of Tacrolimus (Prograf®) to the Once Per Day Form (Advagraf®) [NCT02147938]578 participants (Actual)Observational2014-07-17Completed
ASPIRE: DETERIMINING THE IMPACT OF CRISABOROLE (Eucrisa) AND TACROLIMUS 0.03% ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AND CAREGIVER BURDEN IN CHILDREN WITH ATOPIC DERMATITIS [NCT03645057]Phase 392 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-20Completed
Tacrolimus Treatment for Refractory Pure Red Cell Aplasia, a Prospective Study [NCT03540472]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-10Recruiting
SIMPLE Study: A Prospective and Randomized Trial of a Simplified Immunosuppressive Protocol Utilizing Low Dose EnvarsusXR [NCT04773392]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-23Recruiting
A Pilot Study to Evaluate Impact on Neurological Side Effects (Cognition, Memory, and Tremor) in Elderly (Age>65) Patients [NCT03461445]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-01Completed
A Long Term, Non-comparative, Multi-centre Study to Further Evaluate the Response to Treatment and Safety of 0.03% Tacrolimus Ointment Administered in Pediatric Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis. [NCT00691262]Phase 3166 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Two-Step Approach to Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Advanced Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma [NCT02548468]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-20Withdrawn(stopped due to Slow accrual)
An Open-Label, Comparative, Randomized, Prospective Study To Compare Sirolimus Versus Tacrolimus In De Novo Simultaneous Pancreas- Kidney Allograft Recipients Receiving An Induction Therapy With Antithymocyte Globulin Plus Mycophenolate Mofetil Plus Corti [NCT00693446]Phase 4118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-04-30Active, not recruiting
An Open, Randomized, Multicentre Clinical Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of a Combination of Sequential Therapy of Tacrolimus (FK506) With Monoclonal Anti-IL2R Antibodies and Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Tacrolimus (FK506) With Steroids in Liver [NCT00693524]Phase 294 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
A Multicenter, Three Arm, Randomized, Open Label Clinical Study to Compare Renal Function in Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving an Immunosuppressive Regimen of Advagraf (Immediately or Delayed Post-transplant) and MMF With or Without a Monoclonal Anti- [NCT01011205]Phase 3893 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Study to Investigate the Impact of Pharmacogenetics on CellCept Use, in Patients Participating in a Study in Renal Transplantation [NCT00337493]Phase 4155 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Phase II, Open-Label, Multi-Center Prospective, Conversion Study in Stable Kidney Transplant Patients to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of LCP-Tacro Tablets Once-A-Day to Prograf® Capsules Twice-A-Day [NCT00496483]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Multi-Center Study of Conditioning With Treosulfan, Fludarabine and Escalating Doses of TBI for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT00860574]Phase 296 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Phase I, 2-panel, Open-label, Randomized, Cross-over Trial in Healthy Subjects to Investigate the Effect of TMC435 at Steady-state on the Pharmacokinetics of the Immunosuppressants Cyclosporine and Tacrolimus [NCT01479881]Phase 129 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Study to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of FK506MR vs Prograf® in Combination With Steroids in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation and a Pharmacokinetics Study. [NCT00459719]Phase 342 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Crohn's Disease [NCT04154735]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Discontinued by Investigator)
Randomized Trial of GVHD Prophylasxis With Post-transplantation Cyclophocphomide (PTCy) or Thymoglobulin in Unrelated SCT Recepients With Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Myelodisplatic Syndrome [NCT02627573]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor recruitment)
Renal Allograft Tolerance Through Mixed Chimerism [NCT00801632]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Tacrolimus and Thymoglobulin, as Graft-versus-Host-Disease Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Related Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT01246206]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
A Phase I, Randomized, Observer-blind, Single-center, Vehicle- And Comparator-controlled, Initial Dose-ranging Study To Assess The Antipsoriatic Efficacy Of Different Concentrations Of An2728 Ointment In A Psoriasis Plaque Test [NCT00762658]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
European Transplant Registry of Senior Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Initial Immunosuppression With Tacrolimus Once Daily, Mycophenolate and Steroids [NCT02558452]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2016-12-31Not yet recruiting
A Long-term, Non-comparative, Multi-centre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 0.1% and 0.03% Tacrolimus (FK506) Ointment Administered in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis FG-506-06-IT-01 [NCT00691145]Phase 3350 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
Ph3, Open Label, Multi-Ctr, Pros, Rand Study -Efficacy and Safety, Conversion Prograf® Capsules BID to LCPTacro Tablets QD, for Prevent of Acute Allograft Rejection in Stable Kidney Transplant pt. [NCT00817206]Phase 3326 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Prospective Observational Trial to Evaluate Clinical Prognosis and the Risk Factors for Progression for Myasthenia Gravis Patients [NCT04101578]2,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2017-02-08Recruiting
Pilot Study to Evaluate the Safety and Feasibility of Induction of Mixed Chimerism in Sickle Cell Disease Patients With COH-MC-17: a Non-Myeloablative, Conditioning Regimen and CD4+ T-cell-depleted Haploidentical Hematopoietic Transplant [NCT03249831]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-04Active, not recruiting
A Phase-IV Study Comparing Standard Release Tacrolimus (Prograf) vs Prolonged-release Tacrolimus (Advagraf) Monotherapy as Maintenance Immunosuppression After Induction With Alemtuzumab in Kidney Transplantation [NCT00807144]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Two Step Approach to Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for High Risk Hematologic Malignancies [NCT01760655]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-24Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Prograf® (Tacrolimus) and MR4 (Modified Release Tacrolimus) in de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT00719745]Phase 374 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Multi Center, Non-comparative, Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Conversion to TacroBell SR Cap.(Once-Daily Tacrolimus) in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Therapy With Twice-Daily Tacrolimus After Liver Transplantation. [NCT04069065]Phase 4146 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-31Enrolling by invitation
Development of a Population Pharmacokinetic Model to Optimize Tacrolimus Dosing in Adult Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant. [NCT04645667]38 participants (Actual)Observational2021-02-01Completed
Study of Tacrolimus vs Mycophenolate Mofetil in Pediatric Patients With Frequently Relapsing or Steroid Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome: a Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Parallel-arm Study [NCT04048161]Phase 4270 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-12Completed
Tacrolimus After rATG and Infliximab Induction Immunosuppression (RIMINI) [NCT04114188]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-15Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel Group Study Investigating the Renal Tolerability, Efficacy and Safety of a CNI-free Regimen (Everolimus and MPA) Versus a CNI-regimen With Everolimus in Heart Transplant Recipients [NCT00862979]Phase 4162 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-24Completed
Uterus Transplantation From Live Donors and From Deceased Donors - Clinical Study [NCT03277430]Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-09Recruiting
A Comparison of Effects of Short-term Low Dose Exposure of Advagraf® and Neoral® Microemulsion Cyclosporine A on Renal Perfusion and Function in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00818194]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Vorinostat Plus Tacrolimus & Mycophenolate to Prevent Graft Versus Host Disease Following Reduced Intensity Conditioning Related Donor Allogeneic Transplant [NCT00810602]Phase 1/Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Three-arm Clinical Trial for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies and Mismatched Donors - Haploidentical, 1 Antigen Mismatch Related or Unrelated, and Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD)- Using a T-cell Replete Allograft and High-dose Post-transplant Cyclopho [NCT01010217]Phase 2176 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-05Completed
A 1-year Comparison of Generic Tacrolimus (Tacni) and Prograf in Renal Transplant Patients - a Retrospective Matched Pair Analysis [NCT02587052]186 participants (Actual)Observational2015-10-31Completed
Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Unrelated and Related Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematological Malignancies [NCT01349101]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-10Completed
Optimum Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Recipients at High Risk of Developing New Onset Diabetes After Transplantation: A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled and Randomized Trial. [NCT01002339]Phase 4134 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Terminated: higher rate of acute rejection in the Cyclosporin A group)
Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Topical Calcipotriene, Clobetasol, and Tacrolimus in the Treatment of Pediatric Plaque Morphea [NCT02680717]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Unable to obtain IRB approval at all sites)
Assessment of Cognitive Function Before and After Conversion From Immediate Release Tacrolimus to Envarsus XR [NCT03410654]Early Phase 135 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-24Recruiting
Randomized Trial of Cyclosporine and Tacrolimus Therapy With Steroid Withdrawal in Living-Donor Renal Transplantation [NCT00777933]131 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Multi-Center, Phase III Trial of Calcineurin Inhibitor-Free Interventions for Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease (BMT CTN 1301; Progress II) [NCT02345850]Phase 3346 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
A Double Blind, Multicentre, Randomised, Parallel Group Study to Demonstrate the Equivalence of the Response to Vaccination of a Tacrolimus Ointment Regimen to a Steroid Ointment Regimen in Children With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis [NCT00801957]Phase 2260 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
A Multicenter, Four Arm, Randomized, Open Label Clinical Study Investigating Optimized Dosing in a Prograf®-/Advagraf®-Based Immunosuppressive Regimen in Kidney Transplant Subjects (OSAKA Study) [NCT00717470]Phase 41,252 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-14Completed
A Study to Compare Bone Marrow Transplantation to Standard Care in Adolescents and Young Adults With Severe Sickle Cell Disease (BMT CTN 1503) [NCT02766465]Phase 2138 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Completed
A Prospective Non-randomized Trial of Conversion From Twice a Day Tacrolimus to Once Daily Modified Release Tacrolimus [NCT02545972]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-02-29Recruiting
Triple Arm, Prospectively Randomized Multi Centre Study Phase IV to Evaluate Calcineurin Inhibitor Reduced, Steroid Free Immunosuppression After Renal Transplantation in Non-risk Patients [NCT00724022]Phase 4600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Randomized Comparative Study on Effects of Immunosuppression on HCV Recurrence After Living Donor Liver Transplantation - Comparison Between Tacrolimus + MMF and Tacrolimus + Steroid [NCT00469131]Phase 379 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Study of Prolonged-release Tacrolimus in Stable Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT06147648]Phase 4352 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-01Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressive Withdrawal After Pediatric Liver Transplantation [NCT06147375]47 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-01Not yet recruiting
A First-in-Human Study of HLA-Partially to Fully Matched Allogenic Cryopreserved Deceased Donor Bone Marrow Transplantation for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies [NCT05589896]Phase 1/Phase 212 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Recruiting
A Multicenter, Open-label, Non-comparative Study of Modigraf® (Tacrolimus Granules) to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Long-term Safety and Efficacy in De Novo Pediatric Allograft Liver and Kidney Transplantation Recipients [NCT05152628]Phase 455 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-11Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Study Using Tacrolimus, Sirolimus and Bortezomib as Acute Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Transplantation [NCT00670423]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-16Completed
Randomized, Prospective Single-center Study Comparing a Rapid Discontinuation of Corticosteroids (Steroid Withdrawal) With Corticosteroid Therapy in Kidney Transplantation Using Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tacrolimus Maintenance Therapy [NCT00596947]Phase 418 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Terminated(stopped due to due to low study enrollment)
The Effects of Treatment of Subclinical Rejection on Renal Histology and Graft Function in Renal Transplant Patients Receiving Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil [NCT00885820]Phase 4240 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
A Phase I Study of Reduced Intensity, Sequential Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation Using ProHema Modulated Umbilical Cord Blood Units in Subjects With Hematological Malignancies. [NCT00890500]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Extension Study to the Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Study CRAD001H2304 to Evaluate the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Concentration-controlled Everolimus in Liver Transplant Recipient [NCT01150097]Phase 3284 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
A 24 Month, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Concentration-controlled Everolimus to Eliminate or to Reduce Tacrolimus Compared to Tacrolimus in de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT00622869]Phase 3719 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Pilot Study of Sirolimus, Tacrolimus and Short Course Methotrexate for Prevention of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease in Recipients of Mismatched Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00612274]Early Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Design, Multiple-Site Clinical Study to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of Two Tacrolimus 0.1% Topical Ointment Formulations in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis [NCT00833079]Phase 1500 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Single Center, Open-label Randomized Prospective Trial: Effect of Sirolimus on Polycystic Liver Disease [NCT00934791]2 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to inadequate enrollment)
Ph 2, Double-Masked, Randomized, Parallel, Sham Surgery/Placebo Control, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate Systemic IMT Regimens as Graft Rejection Prophylaxis Following Transplantation of hESC Derived RPE Cells in Patients With AMD [NCT02563782]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-24Withdrawn(stopped due to Changes to the study design and the cell line)
A Pilot Open Labeled Study of Tacrolimus to Assess it's Effects on Bio-markers of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease [NCT04263519]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Covid restrictions)
Predictors of Rejection in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation [NCT04292418]70 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-05-01Not yet recruiting
Pharmacokinetic Assessment of Tacrolimus Exposure Before and After a Switch From Twice Daily Immediate-release (Prograf®) to Once-daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus (Envarsus®) [NCT02882828]Phase 4140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-31Recruiting
An Open-label, Single-centre Study to Assess the Effect of Food on the Relative Bioavailability of Orally Administered Tacrolimus Modified Release Formulation, FK506E (MR4), in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT00865137]Phase 327 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Reduced Intensity Conditioning and Partially HLA-mismatched (HLA-haploidentical) Related Donor Bone Marrow Transplantation for High-risk Solid Tumors [NCT01804634]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-03-27Recruiting
Conversion to Extended-release MeltDose® Tacrolimus After Kidney Transplantation - Impact on Glucose Metabolism and Lipid Profile [NCT05396898]Phase 444 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-16Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2a, Randomized, Open-label, Active Control, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of ASKP1240 in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT01780844]Phase 2149 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-05Completed
Fludarabine, Bendamustine, and Rituximab (FBR) Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Conditioning for Patients With Lymphoid Malignancies [NCT00880815]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-17Completed
A Phase II Study of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Patients With Inborn Errors of Immunity [NCT04339777]Phase 266 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-22Recruiting
A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter, Double Blind, Parallel Assignment, Placebo Controlled Bioequivalence Study of Pimecrolimus Cream, 1% and Elidel® (Pimecrolimus) Cream, 1% in Patients With Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis [NCT03107611]Phase 3654 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
Acalabrutinib for GVHD Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Lymphomas and Leukemia [NCT04961801]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Manufacturer AstraZeneca withdrew the study due to lack of funding)
Envarsus in Delayed Graft Function: A Phase IV, Randomized, Single Center Study Among Kidney Transplant Recipients With Delayed Graft Function (DGF) to Study the Effect of Envarsus XR in the DGF Recovery [NCT03864926]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-18Completed
A Randomized, Open Label, Cross Over Study to Examine the Impact of Prograf and Advagraf on Tacrolimus Exposure, Mycophenolic Acid Pharmacokinetics, Renal Allograft Function or Adverse Effects. [NCT01410162]Phase 453 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Specified Drug Use-Results Survey on Long-Term Treatment for Prograf® Capsules 0.5 mg, 1 mg Lupus Nephritis [NCT01410747]1,484 participants (Actual)Observational2007-04-10Completed
Pilot Trial of Targeted Immune-Depleting Chemotherapy and Reduced-Intensity Matched Unrelated Double Cord Blood Transplant for the Treatment of Leukemias, Lymphomas, and Pre-Malignant Blood Disorders [NCT00973804]Phase 14 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-25Terminated
Prevention of Skin Cancer in High Risk Patients After Conversion to a Sirolimus-based Immunosuppressive Protocol [NCT00866684]Phase 444 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient patient recruitment)
A Phase 2 Trial of Rituximab and Corticosteroid Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease [NCT00350545]37 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Prospective Study:Clinical Trial on the Tacrolimus Dosage Range in Chinese Renal Transplant Recipients With Different Genetic Phenotypes of Drug Metabolizing Enzymes(CYP3A5) [NCT00935298]Phase 4145 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Randomized, Multi-Center Comparative Trial of Tacrolimus w/Steroids and Standard Daclizumab Induction vs a Novel Steroid-Free Tacrolimus Based Immunosuppression Protocol w/ Extended Daclizumab Induction in Pediatric Renal Transplantation [NCT00141037]Phase 1/Phase 2130 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label Study to Compare the Rate of New Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer in Maintenance Renal Allograft Recipients Converted to a Sirolimus-based Regimen Versus Continuation of a Calcineurin Inhibitor-based Regimen [NCT00129961]Phase 486 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
A Phase II, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized Study of LCP-Tacro Tablets vs. Azathioprine, in Combination With Corticosteroids, for the Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis [NCT00608894]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Study was discontinued due to slow enrollment)
Multi-center, Open-label, Prospective, Randomized, Parallel Group Study Investigating a CNI-free Regimen With Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium and Everolimus in Comparison to Standard Therapy With Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium and Ciclosporin Mic [NCT00332839]Phase 493 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Terminated(stopped due to The trial was terminated early due to slow enrollment. It was determined that the planned sample size of 300 could not be achieved.)
Efficacy of Envarsus XR and Digital Health Technology in Reducing Tacrolimus Fluctuation and Frequency of Dose Changes [NCT04711291]66 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-11Not yet recruiting
A Multi-center Phase II Study of Selective Depletion of CD45RA+ T Cells From Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts for the Prevention of GVHD [NCT00914940]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-17Terminated(stopped due to Did not reach one of the primary endpoints of decreased total acute GVHD)
A Comparison of Effects of Standard Dose vs. Low Dose Advagraf® With IL-2 Receptor Antibody Induction, MMF and Steroids, With or Without ACEi/ARB - Based Antihypertensive Therapy on Renal Allograft Histology, Function, and Immune Response [NCT00933231]Phase 3281 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-17Completed
Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tacrolimus vs Tacrolimus Alone for the Treatment of Idiopathic Membranous Glomerulonephritis (IMG) [NCT00843856]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-03Completed
Effects of Altered Formulation on the Bioequivalence of Tacrolimus in Healthy Female and Male Volunteers [NCT02341274]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-11Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multiple-Site Study to Evaluate the Therapeutic Equivalence of a Generic Tacrolimus Ointment, 0.1% (Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd) to the Marketed Product Protopic® (Tacrolimus) Ointment, 0.1 [NCT02601703]Phase 31,110 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
A Double Blind Phase II Study Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Tacrolimus Versus Topical Clobetasol Propionate in the Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus. [NCT00757874]Phase 256 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
A Multicentre, Randomised, Double Blind, Two Arm Parallel Group Study to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Modified Release Tacrolimus FK506E (MR4) Versus Tacrolimus FK506 in Combination With Steroids in Patients Undergoing Primary Liver Tra [NCT00189826]Phase 3475 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
Effectiveness and Safety of Campath-1H as an Induction Agent in Combination With Tacrolimus Monotherapy for Prevention of Graft Rejection Compared to Tacrolimus in Combination With MMF and Steroids in Cadaveric Kidney Transplantation [NCT00147381]Phase 3197 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
AT-1501-K207: BESTOW: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tegoprubart in Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplantation [NCT05983770]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-30Recruiting
Treatment of Vitiligo With Narrowband UVB (TL01) Combined With Tacrolimus (0.1%) Versus Placebo Ointment, a Randomized Right/Left Double Blind Comparative Study [NCT00807690]Phase 30 participants Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Open-label, Non-randomised, Single-centre, Multiple-dose, Phase 1, Pharmacokinetic Trial With a Topical Formulation of Tacrolimus in Healthy Subjects [NCT03673527]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-22Completed
Comparison of Efficacy of Glycerol, Two Topical Steroids, and a Topical Immune Modulator Against Experimentally Induced Skin Irritation [NCT00779792]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Active, not recruiting
Single Center, Randomized, Open-label, Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Tacrolimus Tablet(TacroBell) in Kidney Transplant Recipients. [NCT04102943]Phase 4128 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-30Enrolling by invitation
Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model for Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy Treated With Glucocorticoids Plus Tacrolimus [NCT05667896]50 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2023-06-30Not yet recruiting
Validation of Pharmacogenetics Plus Drug Combination Guided Initial Tacrolimus Dosage in Chinese Renal Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study [NCT01068067]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-03-31Recruiting
Evaluation of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of 0.05% Cyclosporine and 0.1% Tacrolimus Eye Drops in the Treatment of Chronic Ocular Graft-versus-host Disease [NCT05294666]Phase 489 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-01Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Pilot Study To Compare The Effect On Carotid Atherosclerosis Of A Tacrolimus-Based Regimen With Conversion From A Tacrolimus- To A Sirolimus-Based Regimen At 3-4 Months Post-Transplant In De Novo Renal Transplant Rec [NCT00311311]Phase 372 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Terminated(stopped due to See termination reason in detailed description.)
Multicenter, Open-label, Parallel Clinical Investigation of the Safety and Efficacy of Advagraf® (Extended Release Tacrolimus) vs. Prograf® (Tacrolimus) in de Novo Kidney Recipients 1 Month After Kidney Transplantation [NCT01742624]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies Using Haploidentical Donors: A Phase I Trial of Pre-Transplant Cyclophosphamide [NCT00006042]Phase 10 participants Interventional1999-12-31Completed
A Scandinavian Controlled, Randomized, Open-label, and Multi-centre Study Evaluating if Once-daily Tacrolimus or Twice-daily Cyclosporin, Reduces the 3-year Incidence of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation [NCT02936505]249 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-12Active, not recruiting
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00006747]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-11-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Alefacept in Combination With Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Steroids in de Novo Kidney Transplantation - a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study [NCT00617604]Phase 2218 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Evaluation of the Interest of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Immunosuppressants (Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil) Based on Bayesian Estimation During the Three First Years Following Lung Transplantation, in Patients With or Without Cystic Fibrosis [NCT00975663]Phase 4180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-09-30Terminated
A Phase I, Open Label, Fixed-Sequence Study to Estimate the Effect of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine on the Pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550 in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00860496]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Evaluation of the Benefit/Risk Ratio of a Reduction of Tacrolimus Dose in Association With Mycophenolate Mofetil on the Prevention of Complications in Adult Liver Transplantation [NCT00151632]Phase 3195 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Terminated(stopped due to insufficient enrollment)
Effects of Conversion From Sirolimus Oral Solution to Tablets in Renal Transplant Recipients. [NCT00166842]Phase 440 participants Interventional2002-09-30Active, not recruiting
Open Label Phase II Trial of Sirolimus in Combination With Tacrolimus for Graft-vs-Host Disease Prophylaxis After HLA-Matched, Unrelated, Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00144677]Phase 230 participants Interventional2003-11-30Completed
A Pilot Study of Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (ALLOSCT) In Children With Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (RDEB) [NCT00881556]Early Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-20Terminated
An Open-Label, Randomized, Prospective Multicenter Study To Compare The Efficacy And Safety Among 3 Immunosuppressant Treatment Regimens In Patients Receiving A Liver Transplant For ESLD Caused By Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00163657]Phase 4312 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-07-31Completed
A 36 Month Multi-center, Open Label, Randomized, Comparator Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Immunosuppression Treatment in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Exceeding Milan Criteria [NCT02081755]Phase 4336 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-03-31Active, not recruiting
The Vienna Prograf and Endothelial Progenitor Cell Study [NCT00182559]Phase 4148 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
A Study to Determine the Distribution of Tacrolimus in the Skin and the Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Following First and Repeated Application of the Tacrolimus Ointment. [NCT00534508]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-12-31Completed
Bortezomib (Velcade®) and Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Lymphoid Malignancies [NCT00439556]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-13Completed
High Dose Immune Suppression With Hematopoietic Stem Cell Support in Refractory Vasculitis, Necrotizing Vasculitis, Neurovascular Behcet's Disease, and Sjogren's Syndrome [NCT00278512]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-08-31Terminated(stopped due to No participant enrolled over five years. No plan to continue the study.)
A Phase II Exploratory Study to Determine the Safety and Study the Immunomodulatory Functions of Induction Therapy With Campath, Combined With Chronic Immunosuppression With Mycophenolate Mofetil and Sirolimus [NCT00240994]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Belatacept Conversion Trial in Renal Transplantation [NCT00402168]Phase 2173 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Llme Treated Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Hematological Malignancies [NCT00429416]Phase 1/Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, and Multi-centered Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Capsule in Myasthenia Gravis That Was Insufficiently Treated by Glucocorticoid Therapy [NCT01325571]Phase 383 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Phase II Clinical Trial of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation After Nonmyeloablative Conditioning for Patients With Severe Systemic Sclerosis [NCT01047072]Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn
A 6-month, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study of Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus-based Regimen Versus Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)-Based Regimen in Maintenance Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT00267189]Phase 3145 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
a Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study of Two Oral Formulations of Tacrolimus in Renal Allograft Recipients [NCT01055964]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Timed Sequential Busulfan and Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Allogeneic Transplantation [NCT02861417]Phase 2204 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-05Active, not recruiting
Conditioning for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation With Fludarabine Plus Targeted IV Busulfan and GVHD Prophylaxis With Thymoglobulin, Tacrolimus and Methotrexate in Patients With Myeloid Malignancies [NCT01056614]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Imatinib Mesylate, Busulfan, Fludarabine, Antithymocyte Globulin and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT00499889]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Support issue.)
Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Two-period, Two-sequence Crossover Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study of Generic Tacrolimus (Sandoz) and Advagraf® in Stable Renal Transplant Patients (TODAY) [NCT03978494]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-02Withdrawn(stopped due to company decision)
A Multicenter, National, Open-label, Prospective, Randomized Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Tolerability of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium 1440 mg/Day With Tacrolimus Reduced Dose Versus Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium 720 mg/Day With Tacrolimus [NCT00284934]Phase 394 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Double-blind Comparison of 0.1% Tacrolimus Ophthalmic Ointment and 2% Cyclosporine Eye Drops in the Treatment of Vernal Keratoconjunctivits (VKC) [NCT01068054]Phase 2/Phase 324 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Steroid Free Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation [NCT00296244]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Multicenter, Phase 2, Open-label, Controlled, Extension Study For Stage 1 Subjects Of Study A3921009 To Evaluate The Long-term Safety And Efficacy Of Cp-690,550 Versus Tacrolimus, When Co-administered With Mycophenolate Mofetil In Renal Allograft Recipi [NCT00263328]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Randomized Trial of Rituximab in Induction Therapy for Living Donor Renal Transplantation [NCT01095172]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Active, not recruiting
Open-Label, Randomized Comparison of NODAT in Renal Transplant Patients Receiving a Nulojix (Belatacept) Regimen Versus Standard Therapy Immunosuppression [NCT01875224]Phase 432 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-08-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase IV, Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Advagraf® (Modified Release Tacrolimus, Once Daily) After Using Prograf® (Tacrolimus Twice Daily) in de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT01882322]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-30Completed
Pharmacokinetic Studies of Tacrolimus in Transplant Patients [NCT01889758]Phase 478 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
[NCT01895049]Phase 4171 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A Multicentre, Prospective, Non-Interventional Study to Assess the Intra-patient Variability of Tacrolimus Once and Twice Daily After Kidney Transplantation [NCT01904045]51 participants (Actual)Observational2013-05-31Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, Single Dose, Crossover Pivotal Bioequivalence Study of Tacrobell Capsule 1mg Versus Prograf Capsule 1mg in Healthy Subjects [NCT01910077]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A Single Center, Single Arm, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Modified Release, ADVAGRAF® After Treatment With a Tacrolimus in New Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT04761731]Phase 431 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Open, Prospective, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppression Regimens Based on Cyclosporine (Neoral®) and Tacrolimus (Prograf®) in Renal Transplant Patients [NCT00204191]Phase 4300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-05-31Recruiting
Evaluation of Early Dose Escalation Using Extended-Release Tacrolimus (Envarsus XR®) to Reduce Acute Rejection and Donor Specific Antibodies in African American Renal Transplant Recipients [NCT04665310]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Study not started, funding)
European Multicenter and Open-Label Controlled Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Sequential Treatment With Tacrolimus-Rituximab Versus Steroids Plus Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Primary Membranous Nephropathy (The STARMEN Study) [NCT01955187]Phase 386 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Prospective, Open, Randomized Controlled Stage II Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Thymosin Alpha-1 in Treating Moderate to Severe Immune-related Adverse Events [NCT06178146]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-01Recruiting
A Phase I/IIa, Open-label, Non-randomized, Study of ASC-101 in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Who Are Candidates for Dual-cord Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation (UCBT) [NCT01983761]Phase 1/Phase 225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-11-30Active, not recruiting
A Study Comparing Thymoglobulin to Tacrolimus in Liver Transplant and Impact on Renal Function [NCT00564538]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-12-31Enrolling by invitation
A Single Center, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Pilot Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Conversion Versus Standard Immunosuppression in Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT01998789]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-10-31Recruiting
Phase 3 : Tacrolimus Ointment Interest (PROTOPIC ®) in the Maintenance Treatment of Severe Seborrheic Dermatitis on Adult Face [NCT02004860]Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Sequential Myeloablative Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Followed by Allogeneic Non-Myeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Poor Risk Lymphomas [NCT01181271]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
MT2015-20: Biochemical Correction of Severe Epidermolysis Bullosa by Allogeneic Cell Transplantation and Serial Donor Mesenchymal Cell Infusions [NCT02582775]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Phase I Study of Bortezomib With or Without Total Marrow Irradiation (TMI) Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in Combination With Fludarabine (FLU) and Melphalan (MEL) as a Preparative Regimen for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell (HSC) T [NCT01163357]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-28Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Clinical and Safety Outcomes Associated With Conversion From Brand-Name to Generic Tacrolimus Products in High Risk Transplant Recipients [NCT02014103]Phase 471 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
Thymoglobulin Induction Therapy With Minimal Immunosuppression and Evaluation of Allograft Status by Biopsy and mRNA Profiles (TIMELY Study) [NCT00731874]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Terminated(stopped due to A higher rate of late rejection was seen in the low tacrolimus arm.)
An Extension Study of the Patients Enrolled in Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis Study (Protocol No. FJ-506E-BT01) to Assess Safety and Efficacy of GVHD Prophylaxis of a Tacrolimus New Oral Formulation (MR4). [NCT00189748]Phase 20 participants Interventional2004-08-31Completed
Polymorphism of the Cytochrome P450-system and the MDR-system in Renal Transplants Receiving the Immunosuppressive Drugs Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, Everolimus or Cyclosporine A [NCT00223054]200 participants (Actual)Observational2005-03-31Completed
Peking University Third Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee [NCT04590183]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-01Recruiting
A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-masked Study of 0.1% Tacrolimus(FK506) Ophthalmic Suspension in Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis [NCT00567762]Phase 356 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
Phase III, Long-Term, Open-Label, Extension Study of 0.1% Tacrolimus(FK506) Ophthalmic Suspension in Patients [NCT00567918]Phase 352 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Multi-center, Phase III Study of CD24Fc for Prevention of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT04095858]Phase 311 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-05Terminated(stopped due to Business Reasons)
A Phase II Trial of CD24Fc for Prevention of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease Following Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant [NCT02663622]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-19Completed
Comparison Between Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil for Induction of Remission in Lupus Nephritis [NCT01580865]84 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Investigation of Pain Incidence After FK506 Immunosuppressive Therapy in Liver Transplantation Patients [NCT04559048]300 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-09-15Recruiting
A Pilot Study for the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus in the Treatment of Refractory Lupus Nephritis [NCT00569101]Phase 29 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-09-30Active, not recruiting
Influence of CYP3A5 Polymorphism on Liver Function Abnormality and the Trough Level Change After Conversion From Tacrolimus (Bid) to Advagraf® (qd) in Stable Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT02882113]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-07-31Recruiting
A Pilot Phase II Study of Sirolimus, Tacrolimus, Thymoglobulin and Rituximab as Graft-versus-Host-Disease Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Haploidentical and HLA Partially Matched Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT01116232]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of funding.)
Pharmacologic Pretransplant Immunosuppression (PTIS) + Reduced Toxicity Conditioning (RTC) Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Inherited Hematologic Disorders [NCT05293509]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-02Withdrawn(stopped due to 0 accrual)
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) for the Treatment of Hematological Diseases [MT2015-32] [NCT02661035]Phase 2156 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-09Completed
Clinical Assessment of Protopic® Ointment in Deep Partial-Thickness Burns [NCT05856994]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-01Recruiting
BMT-06: Phase II Study of Intensity Modulated Total Marrow Irradiation (IM-TMI) in Addition to Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide and Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide Conditioning for Partially HLA Mismatched (Haploidentical) Allogeneic Transplantation in Patie [NCT04187105]Phase 227 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-27Recruiting
Multi-Center Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial of Naïve T Cell Depletion for Prevention of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Children and Young Adults [NCT03779854]Phase 268 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-29Recruiting
Phase I Study of Escalating Doses of Total Marrow and Lymphoid Irradiation (TMLI) During Conditioning for HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Myelodysplasia or Acute Leukemia [NCT02446964]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-06-25Active, not recruiting
Tacrolimus, Mini-dose Methotrexate and Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Tacrolimus and Methotrexate for the Prevention of Acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease [NCT01951885]Phase 3101 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-07Completed
A Prospective Study of Optimal Cord Selection for Haplo-Cord Transplantation: Targeting the Inherited Paternal Antigen (IPA) and Matching for the Non-Inherited Maternal Antigen (NIMA) [NCT01810588]Phase 2273 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-16Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter, Non-comparative, Open-labeled, Prospective Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus (Prograf®) With Steroid in Korean Lupus Nephritis Patients Who Are Non-responders to Steroid Monotherapy [NCT01316133]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-19Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated due to poor patient recruitment.)
Efficacy of Achieving Early Target Trough Levels of Tacrolimus Using CYP3A5 Guided Dosing Versus Weight-based Dosing in a Multi-ethnic Population of Kidney Transplant Recipients in Singapore [NCT04825262]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-01Recruiting
Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, 24 Months Follow-up, Two Arm Study to Compare the Efficacy of Everolimus in Improving the Cardiovascular Profile in a Regimen With Mycophenolic Acid vs. a Regimen of CNI+MPA in Maintenance Renal Transplant Recipients. [NCT01169701]Phase 471 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Bortezomib-based Graft-Versus-Host-Disease Prophylaxis After Myeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients Lacking HLA-matched Related Donors: A Phase 2 Study [NCT01323920]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Randomized Trial to Demonstrate the Pharmacokinetics of LCP-Tacro™ Tablets Once Daily and Prograf® Capsules Twice Daily in Adult De Novo Liver Transplant Patients [NCT00772148]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
The Effects of Topical Corticosteroid Use on Insulin Sensitivity and Bone Turnover [NCT04114097]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-22Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Prograf (Tacrolimus)/MMF and Extended Release (XL) Tacrolimus /MMF in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT00717678]Phase 373 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
An Multi-site, Open, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Multi-target Therapy in the Treatment of Class Ⅲ,Ⅳ,Ⅴ,Ⅲ+Ⅴand Ⅳ+Ⅴ Lupus Nephritis [NCT00876616]362 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Head to Head Comparison of Tacrolimus and Myfortic vs Tacrolimus and Sirolimus Used in Combination in Non-HLA Identical Living Donor Kidney Transplants [NCT01038505]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lost funding source)
Enhancement of Functional Recovery After Peripheral Nerve Injury With Tacrolimus [NCT00950391]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to PI unable to secure funding for the project so study was not pursued.)
Open Randomized Mult-Center Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Low Molecular Weight Sulfated Dextran in Islet Transplantation (CIT-01) [NCT00789308]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-11Completed
Multicentre, Open Study for the Setting up of Population Pharmacokinetic Models and Bayesian Estimators for Individual Dose Adjustment of Immunosuppressive Drugs (Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil, Everolimus) During the First Year Post-graf [NCT00812786]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Phase II, Open-Label, Multi-Center Prospective, Conversion Study in Stable Liver Transplant Patients to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of LCP-Tacro Tablets Once-A-Day to Prograf® Capsules Twice-A-Day [NCT00608244]Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Rapamune and Tacrolimus vs. Cyclosporine and Methotrexate as Immune Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Using HLA-A, -B, -DRβ1 Identical Related or Unrelated Donors. A Nordic Multicen [NCT00993343]Phase 3215 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Comparative, Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy of Tacrolimus 0.03% Ointment Versus Fluticasone 0.005% Ointment in Children Aged 2 Years or Over Suffering From Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis. [NCT00689832]Phase 4487 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
"Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare a Calcineurin Inhibitor Free Immunosuppression With a Low Dose Tacrolimus Based Immunosuppression in Old for Old Kidney Transplantation." [NCT00912678]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
[NCT02752529]415 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-03-31Recruiting
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multi-Center Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of a Tacrolimus New Oral Formulation (MR4) in De Novo Bone Marrow Transplant Recipients [NCT00189761]Phase 20 participants InterventionalCompleted
[NCT00615173]Phase 381 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Investigator Blinded Study of Protopic (Tacrolimus) Ointment Vs. Elidel (Pimecrolimus) Cream in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis [NCT00666302]Phase 4413 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Investigator Blinded Study of Protopic (Tacrolimus) Ointment Vs. Elidel (Pimecrolimus) Cream in Pediatric Patients With Mild Atopic Dermatitis [NCT00667160]Phase 4426 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Combination With Busulfan and Cyclophosphamid and Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With High Risk CD33+ Acute Myelogenous Leukemia/Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia [NCT00669890]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Terminated(stopped due to PI left institution)
Calcineurin Inhibitor in NEuRoloGically Deceased Donors to Decrease Kidney delaYed Graft Function (CINERGY)-Pilot Trial [NCT05148715]Phase 2414 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-11Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Intravenous Melphalan and Busulfan Followed by HLA-Matched, Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma [NCT00313625]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Open Label, Controlled Study to Compare the Sustained Virological Response During Treatment With Neoral or Tacrolimus in Maintenance Liver Transplant Recipients Treated With Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin for Recurrent Hepa [NCT00938860]Phase 492 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Abatacept for Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: a Sickle Transplant Alliance for Research Trial [NCT02867800]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Active, not recruiting
A 12 Month, Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label Non-inferiority Study Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Concentration-controlled Everolimus With Low Dose Tacrolimus to Mycophenolate Mofetil With Standard Dose Tacrolimus in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipie [NCT01025817]Phase 3613 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Evaluation of Tacrolimus (Prograf®) Intraportal Infusion During the Implantation and the Protective Effect on Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Orthotopic Liver Transplant Recipients - Single Center Study [NCT00609388]Phase 426 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
[NCT00615667]Phase 361 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Sirolimus Associated With Tacrolimus at Low Doses in Elderly Kidney Transplant Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02683291]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Phase III Multicenter, Randomized Trial Comparing Tacrolimus/Sirolimus/Methotrexate Versus Tacrolimus/Methotrexate or Cyclosporine/Mycophenolate Mofetil for GVHD Prophylaxis After Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With [NCT00928018]Phase 3139 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Thiotepa-Clofarabine-Busulfan With Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant for High Risk Malignancies [NCT00857389]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-02Completed
A 24-month, Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Trial to Investigate Efficacy, Safety and Evolution of Cardiovascular Parameters in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients After Early Calcineurin Inhibitor to Everolimus Conversion [NCT01114529]Phase 3828 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-09Completed
A Prospective, Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized, Two Period, Two Sequence, Crossover Study to Compare the Steady State Pharmacokinetics of Generic Tacrolimus (Sandoz) to Prograf in Stable Renal Transplant Patients [NCT01256294]Phase 471 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Kidney Immunosuppression Dosed Daily Only (KIDDO) - A Pilot Study [NCT04156204]Early Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-20Terminated(stopped due to Discontinuation of study due to site staffing and resources available to conduct the study)
Open-label, Randomised Multicentre Study of CAMPATH-1H Versus Basiliximab Induction Treatment and Sirolimus Versus Tacrolimus Maintenance Treatment for the Preservation of Renal Function in Patients Receiving Kidney Transplants [NCT01120028]Phase 2/Phase 3852 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Selective CD28 Blockade With Lulizumab Compared to CNI Inhibition With Tacrolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients [NCT04903054]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-10Withdrawn(stopped due to Limited period of availability of a supply of the study drug and difficulties in enrollment)
Glucose Disorders Induced by Tacrolimus on Pre Transplantation Endstage Renal Disease Patients [NCT03640026]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-08Recruiting
Impact of Envarsus XR® on Kidney Biopsy Subclinical Rejection and Blood Immunologic Profile [NCT03321656]Phase 2/Phase 378 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-28Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Certican® (Everolimus) in Combination With Myfortic® (EC-MPS, Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium) After Early CNI Elimination Versus Myfortic® in Combination With Prograf® in Renal Transplant Recipients [NCT00965094]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel Group Study of 0417 Ointment [NCT01139450]Phase 3899 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus Biliary Concentrations for Liver-transplanted Patients (STABILE) [NCT02820259]42 participants (Actual)Observational2016-05-01Completed
Evaluation of the Benefit of Antithymocyte Induction Therapy on Hepatic Fibrosis in de Novo Hepatitis C Virus Liver Transplant Patients. [NCT00538265]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A Double Blind Randomized Trial, Placebo-controled of 0.0003% Calcitriol Ointment Versus 0.1% Tacrolimus Ointment in the Treatment of Pityriasis Alba [NCT01388517]Phase 439 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Multi-centre Double Blind Randomised Placebo-controlled Study of the Use of Rectal Tacrolimus in the Treatment of Resistant Ulcerative Proctitis [NCT01418131]Phase 421 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
An Open-Label Study Evaluating Anti-Viral Effects of Voclosporin in SARS-CoV-2 Positive Kidney Transplant Recipients - the VOCOVID Study [NCT04701528]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-15Recruiting
Phase II Study of Shortened-duration Tacrolimus Following Nonmyeloablative Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant With High-dose Posttransplantation Cyclophosphamide in Malignancies That Are Challenging to Engraft [NCT02556931]Phase 2117 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Randomized, Open-label, Multi-Center Study Comparing Tacrolimus With Cyclosporin, Both Arms in Combination With Mycophenolate Mofetil and Corticosteroids for Prevention of Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome in Lung Transplant Patients [NCT01429844]Phase 3274 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-01-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open Label, Single Sequence, Drug Interaction Study of the Pharmacokinetics of ASP015K and Tacrolimus After Separate and Concomitant Administration to Healthy Adult Volunteers [NCT01430065]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
A Feasibility Study of Organ-Sparing Marrow-Targeted Irradiation (OSMI) to Condition Patients With High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT02122081]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-27Completed
Neurotrophic Effects of Immunophilin Ligands on Human Hair Follicles Grafted Onto Service Combined Immunodeficient (SCID) Mice [NCT00177099]Phase 135 participants Interventional2003-07-31Completed
Use of Campath for Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Pancreas After Kidney Transplantation [NCT00177138]Phase 49 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Terminated(stopped due to The clinical use of Campath for transplant patients was temporarily suspended.)
Thistlethwaite Protocol # ITN025ST - Immunosuppression With Campath-1H and Tacrolimus in Liver Transplantation [NCT00166556]Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
The Effect of Sirolimus on the Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus [NCT00166829]Phase 440 participants Interventional2004-05-31Recruiting
A Single-center Pilot Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Tacrolimus Based Immunosuppressive Regimen in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients Converted From Cyclosporine Based Immunosuppressive Regimen [NCT02963103]Phase 413 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor decision to terminate the study because subject enrollment was difficult.)
A Pilot Study of Double Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00423826]0 participants Expanded Access2007-01-31No longer available
An Open-label Study to Evaluate the Effect of Iguratimod Concomitant With Conventional Immunosuppressive Drugs on Preventing Antibody-induced Rejection in Human Leukocyte Antigen(HLA) Highly Mismatched Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT02839941]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-08-31Recruiting
Determining Equivalence Dose for Oral Versus Sublingual Administration of Tacrolimus in Hepatic Receptors [NCT02608606]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Study of Prolonged-release Tacrolimus in Stable Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT06183892]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
A Long-term, Non-comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tacrolimus Oint¬Ment in Paediatric Patients [NCT00560326]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Prograf® (Tacrolimus) as Secondary Intervention vs. Continuation of Cyclosporine in Patients at Risk for Chronic Renal Allograft Failure [NCT00510913]Phase 4450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-02-28Completed
Role of Th1, Th2 and Monokine Responses as Risk Factors of Acute and Chronic Renal Transplant Rejection - Impact of Different Immunosuppressive Protocols [NCT00150891]84 participants (Actual)Observational1998-01-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Reduced Intensity Conditioning Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Primary Immune Deficiencies, Immune Dysregulatory Syndromes, and Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide [NCT04232085]Phase 227 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-12Recruiting
Treatment of Dry Eye Using 0.03% Tacrolimus Eye Drops: Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Study [NCT01850979]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Drug Use-result Survey to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of Tacrolimus + Biological Agents in Daily Clinical Settings [NCT01870908]664 participants (Actual)Observational2012-08-31Completed
Autologous Followed by Non-myeloablative Allogeneic Transplantation for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00882895]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-05Active, not recruiting
A Phase III, Randomised, Single-site Trial on the Minimisation of Immunosuppression In Elderly Renal Transplant Recipients. [NCT05073822]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-02-20Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding not secured)
Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised, Two-Arm, Parallel-Group, Superiority Study to Assess Bioavailability and Practicability of Envarsus® Compared With Advagraf® in de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients (EnGraft) [NCT04720326]Phase 4268 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-23Recruiting
Dosing Strategies for de Novo Once-daily Extended Release Tacrolimus (LCPT) in Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT03713645]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-12Completed
Induction in Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients Without Preexisting Donor-specific antiboDies: a Randomized Multicentre Trial Between a Lymphocyte Depleting and Basiliximab. [NCT05385432]Phase 3244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-12Not yet recruiting
Randomized Therapeutic Study of a Treatment by Tacrolimus Adapted or Not According to the Genotype of the Cytochrome P450 3A5 After Renal Transplantation [NCT00552201]Phase 4280 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Phase III Multicenter Open-label Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Everolimus and Low Dose Tacrolimus to Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil at 6 mo Post-Transplant to Prevent Long-term Complications After Pediatric Heart Transplantation [NCT03386539]Phase 3211 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-29Active, not recruiting
Ph3,DB/DD,Multi-Ctr,Pros,Rand Study-Efficacy and Safety of LCP-Tacro™ Tablets, QD, Compared to Prograf® Capsules,BID, in Combination With Mycophenolate Mofetil for Acute Allograft Rejection in De Novo Kidney Transplant [NCT01187953]Phase 3543 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Ointment in Pediatric Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis [NCT01782729]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Myeloablative Conditioning and Transplantation of Partially HLA-Mismatched Peripheral Blood Stem Cells for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00782379]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Uses of Tacrolimus in Treatment of Oral Ulcers in Behcet Disease [NCT05032248]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-01Completed
Multicenter Trials to Evaluate the Efficacy and Toxicity of Sirolimus/Tacrolimus Combination as a GVHD Prophylaxis After HLA Matched Related PBSCT [NCT01488253]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Terminated(stopped due to We could not receive the support from the national medical insurance owing to the changed policy of the government for clincal trials.)
A Pilot Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Zortress (Everolimus) With Low Dose Tacrolimus to Early Conversion to Calcineulin Inhibitor-Free Regimen and Mycophenolic Acid With Standard Dose Tacrolimus in Recipients of ECD/DCD Kidneys [NCT01878786]Phase 2/Phase 325 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Interim results suggested a concern for patient outcomes and safety)
Renal Allograft Function and Histology Following Switching From A Tacrolimus to Sirolimus (SRL)-Based Immunosuppression- Clinical and Mechanistic Impact [NCT01166724]Phase 312 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Collaborator stopped study)
A Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of Using CD8-High Density Microparticles (CD8-HDM) to Deplete CD8+ Cells From Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in Order to Reduce Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD) Without Compromising an Anti-Leukemia Effect in Patien [NCT00004878]Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to study never opened)
Cord Blood Fucosylation to Enhance Homing and Engraftment in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies [NCT01471067]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-13Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Reducing Calcineruin Inhibitor Target Level by 50% Versus Converting to Rapamycin in Chronic Kidney Dysfunction Without Reversible Causes [NCT01492894]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to study terminated due to low enrollment)
A Pilot Study of Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients Taking Tacrolimus With CNS Symptoms Switched to Envarsus [NCT03270462]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-01Completed
[NCT00443105]Phase 20 participants InterventionalActive, not recruiting
Reduction or Discontinuation of Calcineurine Inhibitors With Conversion to Everolimus-Based Immunosuppresion to Alleviate Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAN) in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Randomized Study [NCT00443508]Phase 460 participants Interventional2007-02-28Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation With JSP191-Based Conditioning in Participants With GATA2 Deficiency [NCT05907746]Phase 232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-29Recruiting
A Phase 2/3, Multicenter, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Zanubrutinib in Patients With Primary Membranous Nephropathy [NCT05707377]Phase 2/Phase 3282 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-17Recruiting
The Effect of Rimonabant Treatment on Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Renal Transplant Recipients -- Pilot Safety Study [NCT00525681]Phase 418 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
An Observational Study of the Immunopathogenesis of and Response to Step-Up Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapy for Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome-Associated Colitis [NCT00514982]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-07Withdrawn
Phase II Study Evaluating Busulfan and Fludarabine as Preparative Therapy in Adults With Hematopoietic Disorders Undergoing Matched Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00516152]Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Rituximab For Prevention Of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) After Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) [NCT01044745]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-10Terminated(stopped due to Study was closed to accrual for safety related to the frequency of BK infections.)
Benadamustine, Fludarabine and Busulfan Conditioning in Recipients of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation (FluBuBe) [NCT04942730]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-21Recruiting
A Randomised, Multi-centre, Double-blind, Pharmacokinetic Study of Tacrolimus Ointment (0.03%) in Paediatric Patients (Aged 3 Months to 24 Months) With Atopic Dermatitis Following First and Repeated Once Daily or Twice Daily Application of the Tacrolimus [NCT00535691]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
A Multiple-Dose (0.3%, 1%, and 3% [w/w]), Randomized, Blinded, Vehicle- and Active Comparator-Controlled, Sequential Dose Cohorts, Multi-Center Trial to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Proof-of-Concept Efficacy of Topical OPA 15406 Ointment, Appl [NCT01702181]Phase 192 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Efficacy of Tacrolimus and i.v.-Immunoglobulins in Rasmussen Encephalitis With Start of Treatment in the Acute Disease Stage. Prospective, Randomised, Open Parallel Group Study [NCT00545493]Phase 2/Phase 316 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-11-30Active, not recruiting
Drug-gene-nutraceutical Interactions of Cannabidiol and Tacrolimus [NCT05490511]Phase 172 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-31Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multiple-Site Study to Evaluate the Therapeutic Equivalence of a Generic Pimecrolimus Cream, 1% (Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd) to the Marketed Product ELIDEL® (Pimecrolimus) Cream, 1% (Valean [NCT02896101]Phase 3755 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Completed
A Long-term, Open Label, Noncomparative Study to Evaluate the Safety of 0.1% Tacrolimus (FK506) Ointment for Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis [NCT00560378]Phase 3789 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-06-30Completed
An Open-label, Multiple-dose, Fixed-sequence, 3-Period Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between HL237 and Tacrolimus in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT04633733]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-22Active, not recruiting
Cord Blood Ex-Vivo MSC Expansion Plus Fucosylation to Enhance Homing and Engraftment [NCT03096782]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-13Completed
Pre-administration of Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin to Optimize Donor T-Cell Engraftment Following Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation From Matched-Related Donors [NCT00787761]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation With Matched Unrelated Donors for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00818961]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Terminated(stopped due to terminated early due to meeting end point with fewer patients than anticipated)
A Prospective, Multi-center, Open-labeled, Randomized Clinical Trial of Patient Adherence and Convenience to Immunosuppressive Agents in Newly Liver Transplant Recipients to Compare QD Early Conversion and BID Tacrolimus Formulation. [NCT03216447]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-23Recruiting
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Nonmalignant Inherited Disorders Using a Treosulfan Based Preparative Regimen [NCT00919503]Phase 298 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A One-Year, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study Evaluating The Efficacy Of Switching From The Twice Daily Tacrolimus Formulation To The Extended Release, Once Daily Formulation To Reduce The Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Scores. [NCT01702207]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
Nonmyeloablative BMT With Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide, Rituximab and Optimized Donor Selection for B-cell Lymphomas [NCT00946023]Phase 2135 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Funding was unavailable to complete the study as originally planned.)
Double-Blind Randomized Vehicle Controlled Study Evaluating Safety and Bioequivalence of Generic Pimecrolimus Cream 1% and Elidel® Comparing Both Active Treatments to a Vehicle Control in Treatment of Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis [NCT02791308]Phase 3587 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION (HSCT) IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH RISK HEMOGLOBINOPATHIES LIKE SICKLE CELL DISEASE AND β-THALESSEMIA-MAJOR USING REDUCED INTENSITY CONDITIONING REGIMEN [NCT02435901]Phase 1/Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Mechanism Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine (the Comprehensive Treatment Regimen) in Treating Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy by Genomewide Association Studies [NCT01799460]80 participants (Anticipated)Observational2010-12-31Recruiting
Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplant Using Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide for GvHD Prophylaxis: A Pilot Study [NCT02248597]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-25Completed
A Prospective, Single-center, Open-label, Pilot Study to Investigate the Effect of Switching to Certican® in Viremia of Hepatitis C Virus in Adult Renal Allograft Recipients. [NCT01469884]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Conversion of Twice-a-day Tacrolimus to Once-Daily Tacrolimus Extended-Release Formulation in Stable Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT01476488]Phase 2/Phase 30 participants Interventional2011-07-31Completed
A Six-month, Prospective, Multicenter, Open Label, Parallel, Randomized Study of the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of EC-MPS With Basiliximab, Corticosteroids and Two Different Levels of Tacrolimus in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients [NCT00229138]Phase 4291 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Use of Sirolimus Vs. Tacrolimus As The Primary Agent In Immunosuppressive Regimen For African-American Renal Allograft Recipients With Immediate Graft Function: A Pilot Study [NCT00252655]Phase 440 participants Interventional2004-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Study To Compare The Safety And Efficacy Of Two Immunosuppressive Regimens In De Novo Renal Allograft Recipients:Sirolimus Plus Mycophenolate Mofetil Plus Corticosteroids Following A Rabbit Anti-Human Thymocyte Globulin Induction (RATG) Vs Ta [NCT00261820]Phase 4160 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Multi-centre, Randomized, Open-label, Study to Compare Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitors to Rapamune Versus Standard Therapy in Established Renal Allograft Recipients on Maintenance Therapy With Mild to Moderate Renal Insufficiency. [NCT00273871]Phase 3190 participants Interventional2002-01-31Completed
Analysis of Two Treatment Protocols for Patients With Oral Lichen Planus [NCT04718311]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-02Completed
Phase II Study Evaluating Busulfan and Fludarabine as Preparative Therapy in Adults With Hematopoietic Disorders Undergoing Matched Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00301912]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Withdrawn because study never opened to accrual)
Pilot Study of Reduced-Intensity Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Adult Patients With Advanced Hematopoietic Malignancies [NCT00301951]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Tacrolimus Treatment of Patients With Idiopathic Focal Segmental [NCT00302536]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to There was less patients recruited.)
Pilot Study of Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Adult Patients With Advanced Hematopoietic Malignancies [NCT00304018]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil as Post-Grafting Immunosuppression After Conditioning With Fludarabine and Low-Dose Total Body Irradiation for Recipients of HLA-Matched Family Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplants [NCT00304720]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-03-31Recruiting
FK506 Phase 3 Study: a Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study for Steroid Non-Resistant Myasthenia Gravis Patients [NCT00309088]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Sirolimus in Addition to Tacrolimus and Methotrexate for the Prevention of Acute-Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation From Unrelated Donors [NCT00089037]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Phase 3, Long-Term, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety of Twice Daily Tacrolimus Cream-B 0.1% in the Treatment of Psoriasis [NCT00293917]Phase 3658 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
An Open, Randomised, Multicenter, Clinical Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Tacrolimus and Minimal Steroids in Combination With Either a Monoclonal Anti-IL2R Antibody (Daclizumab) or Mycophenolate Mofetil in Liver Allograft Transplantation. [NCT00295594]Phase 3627 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
Low-Dose Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for High-Risk Low Grade Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00296023]25 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-01-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Reduced Dose Post Transplantation Cyclophosphamide as GvHD Prophylaxis in Adult Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Receiving HLA-Mismatched Unrelated Donor Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT06001385]Phase 2170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Pilot Study of Human Lysozyme Goat Milk in Recipients of Standard Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT04177004]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-30Recruiting
A Pilot Study of Reduced Intensity HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Advanced Myelofibrosis [NCT03118492]Phase 116 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-24Recruiting
Human Penile Allotransplantation [NCT02395497]Phase 2/Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-06-30Recruiting
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Patients With Mutations in GATA2 or the MonoMAC Syndrome [NCT01861106]Phase 2144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-07-24Recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Total Body Irradiation Plus Metabolism-Based Cyclophosphamide Dosing as Preparative Therapy for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant for Patients With Hematological Malignancy [NCT00317785]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
An Open-Label, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center Study Assessing Fixed Dose Versus Concentration Controlled Cellcept® Regimens for Patients Following a Single Organ Renal Transplantation in Combination With Full Dose and Reduced Dose Calci [NCT00087581]Phase 4720 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
Tacrolimus for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With Membranous Nephritis [NCT00125307]Phase 420 participants Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Alloreactive NK Cells With Busulfan, Fludarabine and Thymoglobulin for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for AML and MDS [NCT00402558]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel Group Study of 0416 Ointment. [NCT01053247]Phase 3793 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Efficacy of Rapamycin in Secondary Prevention of Skin Cancers in Kidney Transplant Recipients - Multicentric Randomized, Open-label Study of Rapamycin vs Calcineurin Inhibitors [NCT00133887]Phase 377 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Bilateral Comparison of Topical Tacrolimus 0.1% vs. Placebo Ointment as Adjunctive Therapy for Patients With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Who Are Candidates for or Poor Responders to Etanercept Therapy [NCT00134394]Phase 220 participants Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen for Haplo-identical Family Donor Stem Cell Transplants for Hematologic Malignancies With Delayed Add-back of Non-alloreactive T Cells [NCT00104975]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
A Multi-Center Study to Assess the Impact of Topical Corticosteroids on the Safety and Efficacy of Protopic Ointment in the Short-Term Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis and to Assess Protopic in the Long-term Management of Atopic Dermatitis [NCT00106496]Phase 4410 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
Interruption of the Calcineurine Inhibitors (ICN) and Introduction of Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Liver Transplant Patients With Side Effects Due to ICN: Study of the Reduction of the Risks of Rejection by Mycophenolate Mofetil Therapeutic Drug Monitor [NCT00456235]Phase 492 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies and Disorders [NCT00053989]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-29Completed
A Phase II, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Tacrolimus Inhalation Aerosol in Subjects With Persistent Asthma [NCT00116103]Phase 20 participants Interventional2005-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center Study of Thymoglobulin Induction Therapy With a Calcineurin Inhibitor Sparing Regimen in Liver Transplant Patients [NCT00117689]Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Prophylaxis of the Graft-Versus-Host-Disease in Patients After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation With a Combination of Tacrolimus and Everolimus [NCT00117702]Phase 2/Phase 324 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Terminated(stopped due to safety reasons)
"Clinical Study on Tacrolimus Ointment Over the Long-term. CONTROL Study - Adults" [NCT00480610]Phase 3226 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Study to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of FK506MR vs Prograf® in Combination With MMF and Steroids in Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplantation and a Pharmacokinetics Study. [NCT00481819]Phase 3240 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Pilot Trial of the Effect of Dietary and Exercise Intervention on Insulin Resistance and Metabolic Parameters in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients on Prograf (Tacrolimus) [NCT00492661]Phase 455 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
An Open Randomized Non-inferiority Study to Compare Safety and Efficacy of Immunosuppressive Regiments Using Tacrolimus From EMS and Prograf® in Post Renal Transplanted Patients [NCT01244659]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor decision)
Cord Blood Expansion on Mesenchymal Stem Cells [NCT00498316]Phase 198 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-03Completed
Comparison of Pimecrolimus Cream 1% Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Dosing in the Management of Atopic Dermatitis in Pediatric Subjects [NCT00139581]Phase 40 participants Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Evaluation of the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of a Tacrolimus-based 5-day Steroid Rapid Withdrawal Immunoprophylactic Regimen in de Novo Renal Transplantation [NCT00133172]Phase 485 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Varience of supply chain from that required by protocol)
Phase II Study of Sequential Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation Using Tacrolimus and Sirolimus as Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis [NCT00133367]Phase 232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Evaluation of the Antipruritic Effect of Elidel (Pimecrolimus) in Non-atopic Pruritic Disease [NCT00507832]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Standardized Time- and Score-oriented Treatment of Moderate and Severe Atopic Dermatitis [NCT00148746]0 participants Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Versus Cyclosporine/Methotrexate for Prophylaxis of Graft Versus Host Disease in Paediatric Patients [NCT01788501]Phase 2/Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Followed By Adoptive Immunotherapy for Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin's Disease [NCT00385788]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil vs Tacrolimus and Sirolimus in SPK, Pancreas After Kidney or Pancreas Transplant Alone [NCT00533442]Phase 2170 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-09-30Completed
A Prospective Trial to Evaluate the Role of In Vivo T Cell Depletion by Campath® (Alemtuzumab) in Reduction of Transplant Related Mortality in Transplantation From HLA-Class I or Class II Mismatched, Unrelated Donors [NCT00555048]Phase 1/Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual)
Phase II Study of the Addition of Azacitidine (NSC#102816) to Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Transplantation for Myelodysplasia (MDS) and Older Patients With AML [NCT01168219]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-15Completed
Phase II Trial of Tacrolimus and Rapamycin vs. Tacrolimus and Methotrexate as GVHD Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT00803010]Phase 274 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Sequential Autologous HCT / Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic HCT Using Related, HLA-Haploidentical Donors for Patients With High-Risk Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT01008462]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-18Completed
ENvarsus for Impaired Glucose Tolerance Post REnal transplAnT [NCT04973982]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of capacity)
Switching Study of Kidney Transplant Patients With Tremor to LCP-Tacro (STRATO) [NCT01438710]Phase 344 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Impact of Donor and Recipient CYP3A5 Genetic Polymorphism on Tacrolimus Exposure in Patients With Hepatic Transplant [NCT01388387]154 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-22Completed
Comparison of Sirolimus Alone With Sirolimus Plus Tacrolimus in Type 1 Diabetic Recipients of Cultured Islet Cell Grafts [NCT00409461]0 participants InterventionalTerminated
A Multicentre, Randomised, Double Blind, Two Arm Parallel Group Study to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Modified Release Tacrolimus FK506E (MR4) Versus Tacrolimus FK506 in Combination With MMF (Cellcept®) and Steroids in Patients Undergoi [NCT00189839]Phase 3699 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
Delayed Tacrolimus to Sirolimus Conversion in Renal Transplant Recipients With Delayed Graft Function [NCT00931255]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Terminated(stopped due to The trial was stopped because of slow recruitment.)
Tacrolimus (FK506) P-III Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Study in Moderate to Severe Refractory Ulcerative Colitis Patients [NCT00347048]Phase 362 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Phase 3 Study of Tacrolimus(FK506)for Lupus Nephritis: A Placebo Controlled, Double-Blind Multicenter, Comparative Study [NCT00429377]Phase 364 participants Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Multicenter, Single-arm, Open, Conversion Study From a Cyclosporine (CyA) Based Immunosuppressive Regimen to a Tacrolimus Modified Release, FK506E (MR4), Based Immunosuppressive Regimen in Kidney Transplant Subjects (CONCERTO: Converting Cyclosporine to [NCT00481481]Phase 3346 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
"Clinical Study on Tacrolimus Ointment Over the Long-term. CONTROL Study - Children" [NCT00480896]Phase 3250 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
A Phase II, Open-Label, Concentration-Controlled, Randomized, 6-Month Study of 'Standard Dose' Tacrolimus + Sirolimus + Corticosteroids Compared to 'Reduced Dose' Tacrolimus + Sirolimus + Corticosteroids in Renal Allograft Recipients [NCT00518271]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-04-30Completed
Phase II Study of Evaluating the Efficacy of Total Marrow and Lymphoid Irradiation (TMLI) as the Conditioning Regimen for HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Myelodysplasia or Acute Leukemia [NCT04262843]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-07Recruiting
Impact of Two Prednisone-free Maintenance Immunosuppressive Regimens With Reduced Dose FK506+Everolimus vs. Standard Dose Tacrolimus (FK506)+ Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) on Subpopulation of T and B Cells, Renal Allograft Function and Gene Expression Profi [NCT01653847]88 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Phase II Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Atorvastatin for the Prophylaxis of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease(GVHD) in Patients With Hematological Malignancies Undergoing HLA-Matched Related Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) [NCT01491958]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-10Completed
Effect of Multiple Doses of Isavuconazole on the Pharmacokinetics of a Single Dose of Tacrolimus: A Phase 1, Open Label, Sequential Study in Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT01535547]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Comparison of Topical Tacrolimus, Triamcinolone and Placebo in the Treatment of Symptomatic Oral Lichen Planus [NCT01544842]28 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of resources)
Utilizing Pharmacogenetics to Predict Drug Interactions in Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT01288521]Phase 48 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
A Multicenter, Comparative Safety and Efficacy Study of ACTHar Gel Alone or in Combination With Oral Tacrolimus to Reduce Urinary Proteinuria in Patients With Idiopathic DNAJB9 Positive Fibrillary Glomerulopathy [NCT05546047]Phase 434 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-14Active, not recruiting
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies After a Non-Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen From HLA-Matched Sibling Donors [NCT00006350]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-01-31Completed
Phase II Clinical Trial Incorporating Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) in Combination With FK506 and Methylprednisolone for Treatment of Severe Acute Graft vs Host Disease [NCT00109993]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Evaluation of Antibody Plus Delayed CSA vs CSA in Determining Delayed Graft Function in Cadaver Transplant Recipients [NCT00007787]350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2000-04-30Completed
Pimecrolimus Cream 1% Plus Topical Corticosteroid in Patients (2-17 Years of Age) With Severe Atopic Dermatitis [NCT00121381]Phase 4400 participants Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Submyeloablative Allogeneic Blood Stem Cell Transplantation With HLA Identical Donor Lymphocyte Infusions From Matched Related and Matched Unrelated Donors for Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00025519]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-06-30Withdrawn
Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Once Daily Versus Twice Daily Dosing [NCT00028171]0 participants InterventionalCompleted
Autologous Followed By Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Transplant For Multiple Myeloma [NCT00028600]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of IV Busulfan (Busulfex) and Melphalan as a Preparatory Regimen Prior to Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation for the Treatment of Advanced and High Risk Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00014469]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-12-31Completed
A Prospective Randomized Open-label Study to Compare Mycophenolate Mofetil and A Prospective Randomized Open-label Study to Compare Mycophenolate Mofetil and Corticosteroid With Tacrolimus and Corticosteroid as Immunosuppressive Treatment for Lupus Membra [NCT00404794]Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Calcineurin-Inhibitor Withdrawal in Renal Allograft Recipients [NCT00275535]Phase 4165 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
A Double-Blind Randomized Trial of Steroid Withdrawal in Sirolimus- and Cyclosporine-Treated Primary Transplant Recipients [NCT00023244]Phase 2274 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Effective August 13, 2004: Unanticipated high incidence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder)
Adoptive Immunotherapy by Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Phase II Study [NCT00027573]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-10-31Completed
Phase III Trial of Hydroxychloroquine + Standard Therapy for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease [NCT00031824]Phase 382 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Assess the Efficacy of Tacrolimus (Prograf®)+ Methotrexate Vs. Placebo + Methotrexate in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Partial Response to Methotrexate [NCT00036153]Phase 3210 participants Interventional2002-03-31Completed
OPRTUNTI: Offering Potential for Reproduction Through Transplantation of Uterus iN the Treatment of Infertility [NCT05646992]Phase 2/Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-01Recruiting
Envarsus® Tablets Administered Once Daily in Combination With Everolimus in Elderly De-novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: Open-label, Multicentre, Single-arm, Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Study [NCT02970630]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation For Patients With Disease Relapse Or Myelodysplasia After Prior Autologous Transplantation [NCT00053196]Phase 282 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
Building a Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Tacrolimus in Paediatric Liver Transplant Patients [NCT02337036]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-12-31Recruiting
Open Label Phase II Trial of Sirolimus in Combination With Tacrolimus for Graft-vs-Host Disease Prophylaxis After Matched, Related Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00144703]Phase 255 participants Interventional2002-07-31Completed
Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Plasmapheresis in Cross Match Positive or ABO Incompatible Kidney Allograft Recipients [NCT00203281]0 participants (Actual)Observational2003-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to funding withdrawn)
A Phase II Multicenter Randomized Study Of Two Non-Myeloablative Stem Cell Transplant Strategies For Low-Grade Lymphoma And Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) [NCT00041288]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual and difficulty with multicenter logistics)
Tacrolimus for the Treatment of Superficial Kaposiform Hemangioendothelioma and Tufted Angioma: a Single Arm Prospective Study [NCT04056962]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-01Recruiting
Tacrolimus, Sirolimus and Methotrexate as Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Non-Myeloablative Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00146614]Phase 2105 participants Interventional2002-07-31Completed
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Randomized Trial To Demonstrate The Pharmacokinetics Of LCP-Tacro™ Tablets Once Daily and Prograf® Capsules Twice Daily In Adult De Novo Kidney Transplant Patients [NCT00765661]Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Single Dose, Open-Label, Randomized, Four-Way Crossover, Fully Replicate, Bioequivalence Study of Generic Tacrolimus and Prograf® Capsules in Healthy Volunteers Under Fasting Conditions [NCT04725682]Phase 167 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-05Completed
Prospective Randomized Study to Characterize Risk Factors of Polyomavirus-related Transplant Nephropathy and the Impact of Three Immunosuppressive Regimens on Nephropathy Incidence [NCT00160966]Phase 4108 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
The Pharmacokinetics and Dosage Regimen of Sirolimus in a Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Patients [NCT00166816]Phase 440 participants Interventional2002-03-31Active, not recruiting
A Six-month Open Label, Multicenter, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Incidence of New Onset Diabetes Mellitus and Glucose Metabolism in Patients Receiving Cyclosporine Microemulsion With C-2 Monitoring Versus Tacrolimus After de Novo Kidney Transplantati [NCT00171496]Phase 4693 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Phase I/II Study of CD45 Antibodies and Alemtuzumab Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation of Patients With Hematological Diseases [NCT00056966]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Pilot Trial for Implementation of a MPA PK Monitoring Strategy [NCT00187915]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
[NCT00189787]Phase 2370 participants (Actual)InterventionalCompleted
Comparison Of Efficacy Of Two Immunosuppressive Protocols Including Tacrolimus With Or Without Mycophenolate Mofetil In Pediatric Liver Transplantation Aimed In Early Termination Of Steroid Therapy [NCT00195988]Phase 440 participants Interventional2002-09-30Completed
[NCT00223015]Phase 415 participants Interventional2004-05-31Completed
A Phase II Study of the Combination of Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil for the Prevention of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease [NCT00096096]Phase 20 participants Interventional2004-08-31Completed
HLA-Haploidentical Related Marrow Grafts for the Treatment of Primary Immunodeficiencies and Other Nonmalignant Disorders Using Conditioning With Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide, TBI and Fludarabine and Postgrafting Cyclophosphamide [NCT00358657]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-24Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual)
Safety of Tacrolimus And Methotrexate (MTX) Versus Tacrolimus And Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) As Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis In Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants (HCT) [NCT00360685]89 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A 24 Month Extension to a 12-month Open Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study Evaluating Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Oral AEB071 Plus Tacrolimus (Converted to Mycophenolic Acid After 3 Months), vs. Mycophenolic Acid Plus Tacrolimus in de Novo Rena [NCT00555789]Phase 2137 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Terminated
A Single Center, Pilot Study of Corticosteroid Discontinuation in Liver Transplant Recipients Utilizing a Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil Based Maintenance Immunosuppression Protocol [NCT00374231]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Hematologic Disorders Who Are Ineligible or Inappropriate for Treatment With a More Intensive Therapeutic Regimen [NCT00448201]Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-07Completed
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Hematologic Disorders Who Are Undergoing Dose-Adjusted Treatment With A Maximally Intensive Busulfex-Based Therapeutic Regimen [NCT00448357]Phase 1/Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
A Two Step Approach To Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies From HLA Partially-Matched Related Donors [NCT00429143]Phase 1/Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
The Effect of Preceding Fractional Co2 Laser Either With Tacrolimus, Calcipotriol or With NB-UVB in the Treatment of Stable Generalized Vitiligo [NCT03234673]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-31Not yet recruiting
Prograf/Advagraf Conversion Study in Kidney Pancreas Transplant Recipients [NCT01797341]Phase 313 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Evaluation of Belatacept as First Line Immunosuppression in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT00555321]Phase 2260 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Terminated
A 24-month Randomized Multicenter Study Evaluating Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Sotrastaurin and Tacrolimus vs. a Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil-based Control Regimen in de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT01128335]Phase 2200 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
A Phase IV, Single Center, Open-label, Single-arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Conversion to Tacrolimus Modified Release, ADVAGRAF® After 12 Month Treatment With a Tacrolimus Stably in Liver Transplant Recipients. [NCT04763096]Phase 4101 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Completed
A Randomized Study of Effect of Preimplantation Portal Vein and Hepatic Artery Liver Flushing With Tacrolimus on Ischemia-reperfusion Injury, Allograft Dysfunction and Liver Histology [NCT01887171]86 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Severe Aplastic Anemia, Using Matched Unrelated Donors and Mismatched Related Donors (SAA MUD) [NCT00578903]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-02-28Terminated
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation After Nonmyeloablative Conditioning for Patients With Severe Systemic Sclerosis [NCT00622895]Phase 1/Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-01Completed
Addition of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Pre- and Post-Allogeneic Transplantation [NCT03856216]Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-28Recruiting
Prevention of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Using Rituximab (Rituxan) Therapy in Cardiac Transplantation (CTOT-11) [NCT01278745]Phase 2362 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Due to inability to meet accrual goals within the funding period)
A Phase II Study of Visilizumab for the Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT00720629]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Terminated
Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Study on Steroid-Free Immunosuppression, in Comparison With Daily Steroid Therapy, in Pediatric Renal Transplant : Impact on Growth, Bone Metabolism and Acute Rejection [NCT00707759]Phase 328 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Transplantation of Two Partially Matched Umbilical Cord Blood Units Following Reduced Intensity Conditioning to Enhance Engraftment and Limit Transplant-Related Mortality in Adults With Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00827099]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Unacceptable morbidity & mortality)
Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Study of Belatacept-based Early Steroid Withdrawal Regimen With Alemtuzumab or rATG Induction Compared to Tacrolimus-based Early Steroid Withdrawal Regimen With rATG Induction in Renal Transplantation [NCT01729494]Phase 4316 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
A 60 Month, Single-arm, Proof-of-concept Study to Induce Allogeneic Tolerance in Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Recipients Using Siplizumab, an Anti-CD2 Antibody in Combination With Cyclophosphamide and Splenectomy [NCT06019507]Phase 212 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-29Recruiting
A Phase II Trial of De-escalated PTCy and Ruxolitinib for GVHD Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic HCT [NCT05622318]Phase 256 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-29Recruiting
Peritransplant Ruxolitinib for Patients With Primary and Secondary Myelofibrosis [NCT04384692]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-18Recruiting
An Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Clinical Study of Mitoxantrone Liposome Combined With PTCy as Conditioning Regimen in Allo-HSCT in Acute Leukemia [NCT05739630]Phase 2/Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-01Recruiting
Phase I Clinical Trial Using an Engineered Peripheral Blood Graft for Haploidentical Transplantation [NCT02960646]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-18Completed
Prospective Case Series of Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation for Unresectable Mucinous Carcinoma Peritonei (TRANSCAPE) [NCT06084780]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-04-30Not yet recruiting
Reduced Intensity, Partially HLA Mismatched Allogeneic BMT for Hematologic Malignancies Using Donors Other Than First-degree Relatives [NCT01203722]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-09-30Recruiting
[NCT00236106]Phase 420 participants Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Maintenance Treatment of Non Segmental Vitiligo With Tacrolimus Ointment 0.1% Versus Control, Randomized and Double Blind Study [NCT01841008]Phase 2/Phase 335 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Terminated
[NCT00268515]Phase 20 participants Interventional1998-04-30Completed
Conversion Pharmacodynamic Study in Stable Renal Transplant Patients Receiving Tacrolimus Two Times a Day to a New Formulation of Tacrolimus - LCP Tacro - 1 Time a Day. [NCT02961608]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Tacrolimus Patch on Caspase-3 Inducing Apoptosis in Oral Lichen Planus ( A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial With Immunohistochemical Analysis) [NCT05139667]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-20Completed
[NCT01680952]Phase 4158 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
An Open-label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Conversion to Everolimus 3 Months After Kidney Transplantation. [NCT01608412]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-02-29Recruiting
Nonmyeloablative Bone Marrow Transplants in Hematologic Malignancies: Dose Finding Study for Post-Transplant Immunosuppression [NCT00255710]Phase 160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-07-31Completed
An Open, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of FK506 Combined MMF in the Treatment of Class III,IV,V + IV or V + III Lupus Nephritis [NCT00298506]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Pilot Safety and Tolerability Open-Label Study of Interferon Beta-1b in Combination With Tacrolimus in Patients Suffering From Multiple Sclerosis Who Have Failed Treatment With Approved Disease Modifying Agents [NCT00298662]Phase 230 participants Interventional2003-02-28Active, not recruiting
Non-Myeloablative HLA-Matched Sibling Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00262886]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-08-31Completed
A Multicentre, Randomised, Open Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of a Combination Therapy of Tacrolimus With Sirolimus Versus Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate Mofetil in Kidney Transplantation. [NCT00296361]Phase 3634 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
Tacrolimus Treatment of Patients With Idiopathic [NCT00302523]16 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
OPTIMA (Optimizing Prograf® Therapy in Renal Transplant Patients) [NCT00297765]Phase 4323 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
FK506 Phase 4 Study: A Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy on Joint Damage in RA Patients [NCT00319917]Phase 4123 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Steroid Avoidance in Hep C OLT [NCT00286871]Phase 140 participants Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Randomized, Multi-Center Study of the Pimecrolimus-Eluting (Corio™) and Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System (SymBio™) in Patients With De Novo Lesions of the Native Coronary Arteries [NCT00322569]Phase 3246 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
Viral Load Guided Immunosuppression After Lung Transplantation, an Open-label, Randomized, Controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Trial [NCT04198506]144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-05Active, not recruiting
Prospective Clinical Study to Observe the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus in Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients for 6 Months Treatment in China [NCT02837978]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Comparative Study of Tacrolimus and Rapamycin to Evaluate the Renal Function in Patients Older Than 50 Years, Receptors of a Kidney From a Donor Older Than 55 Years in a Mycophenolate Mofetil and Daclizumab Immunosuppressor Regime [NCT00290069]Phase 494 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalNot yet recruiting
[NCT00293891]Phase 3658 participants (Actual)InterventionalCompleted
[NCT00293930]Phase 3645 participants (Actual)InterventionalCompleted
Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus With Steroids or Monoclonal Anti-IL2R Antibody in HCV Positive in Liver Transplantation [NCT00295607]Phase 2138 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Non-myeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation With Match Unrelated Donors for Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies and Renal Cell Carcinoma and Aplastic Anemia [NCT00295997]35 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-05-31Active, not recruiting
A Multicentre, Randomised, Open Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of a Combination of Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil Based Regimen With or Without Induction in Elderly Recipients Undergoing Kidney Transplantation [NCT00296309]Phase 3267 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
An Open, Randomised, Multicentre Clinical Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Steroid Withdrawal With Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Daclizumab Against Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Steroids in Children After Kidney Transplantat [NCT00296348]Phase 3198 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
To Compare the Efficacy and Safety of FK506 vs IVC in the Treatment of Class [NCT00302549]61 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
FK506 Phase 3 Study: An Open Study for Steroid Resistant, Non-Thymectomized MG Patients [NCT00309101]Phase 311 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Comparative Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effect and Safety of Tacrolimus Versus Hydrocortisone in Management of Atopic Dermatitis in Children [NCT05607901]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-28Recruiting
HLA-haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using CD3 Depletion for Children and Adolescents With Acute Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Solid Tumors After Conditioning of TBI, Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide and Antithymocyte Glo [NCT01509300]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-01-31Recruiting
An Open- Label, Single-arm, Phase 4 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Shown Unsuccessful Response Against DMARDs [NCT01511003]Phase 4128 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-05Completed
Natural Killer Cells in Allogeneic Cord Blood Transplantation [NCT01619761]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-03Active, not recruiting
Clofarabine, Gemcitabine, and Busulfan Followed by Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) [NCT01629511]Phase 1/Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-21Terminated
Using mTOR Inhibitors in the Prevention of BK Nephropathy [NCT01649609]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Multicentre, Open Label, Randomized, Two-arm, Parallel-group Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of ENVARSUS® Compared With Tacrolimus Used as Per Current Clinical Practice in the Initial Maintenance Setting in de Novo Kidney Transplant Patients [NCT02432833]Phase 4428 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Effect of Different Therapeutic Strategies on Regulatory T Cells in Kidney Transplantation: a Randomized Study [NCT01640743]58 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using Alternate Donor Umbilical Cord Blood Options [NCT01652014]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding unavailable)
Immune Tolerance and Alloreactivity in Liver Transplant Recipients on Different Monotherapy Immunosuppressive Agents [NCT01678937]31 participants (Actual)Observational2007-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open, Parallel Controlled Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Improved Phototherapy in Patients With Vitiligo [NCT05836441]110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-01Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Adding a Single Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) of Natural Killer Cells Early After Nonmyeloablative, HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation - A Multi Center Trial [NCT00789776]Phase 1/Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-13Completed
Phase I/II Trial of Thymus Transplantation With Immunosuppression, #950 [NCT00579527]Phase 1/Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-19Completed
PROACTIVE: Prevention of Acute and Chronic GVHD Using TocIlizumab in Combination With Standard GVHD Prophylaxis After allogEneic Transplantation [NCT03699631]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-06Completed
Generic Tacrolimus in the Elderly - Prograf® vs Tacni® [NCT01698541]Phase 428 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
The Biomarker for CYP3A-mediated Immunosuppressive Agents Metabolism in Chinese Renal Transplant Recipients [NCT01699360]Phase 4600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-09-30Recruiting
Natural Killer (NK) Cells and Nonmyeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation for Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) [NCT01390402]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
A Single Center, Open-label, Randomized Pilot Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Modified-release Tacrolimus, ADVAGRAF®, Versus Those of Twice-daily Tacrolimus, PROGRAF®, in Stable Renal Recipients (SINGLE) [NCT01742676]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety Outcome of Two Different Targets of Advagraf® Trough Levels Between 4 Months and 12 Months After Transplantation Among de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients. [NCT01744470]Phase 4286 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Active, not recruiting
Proactive Treatment With Tacrolimus Ointment in Children With Moderate/Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label Study [NCT01745159]Phase 4125 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Phase IV STudy of Tacrobell in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis [NCT01746680]Phase 4111 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Randomized Controlled Interventional Trial of Immunosuppression Modification Based on the Cylex™ ImmuKnow® Assay in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT01764581]206 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Pre-Transplant Immune Suppression With Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation From Haploidentical Donors for Adults and Children With Sickle Cell Disease or ß-Thalassemia (Haplo PTCy) [NCT05736419]Phase 224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-09Recruiting
Extended Release Tacrolimus (Advagraf®) in Severe Adult Atopic Dermatitis Patients [NCT01789619]9 participants (Actual)Observational2012-10-31Completed
A Phase II Study Evaluating Selective Depletion of CD45RA+ T Cells From Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts From HLA-Matched Related and Unrelated Donors for Prevention of GVHD [NCT02220985]Phase 284 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-03Active, not recruiting
Outcomes of Planned Conversion From Tacrolimus to Sirolimus-based Immunosuppressive Regimen in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT01802268]Phase 4320 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Prospective Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Zortress (Everolimus)/Myfortic (Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium) Conversion in High MELD Liver Transplantation [NCT01807767]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to funding was withdrawn)
Strategies to Improve Long Term Islet Graft Survival [NCT00464555]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Ointment in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis [NCT01828879]Phase 474 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Expanded Access Study for Renal Transplant Patients With Envarsus XR™: Envarsus 3007 [NCT02411604]0 participants Expanded AccessApproved for marketing
A 12-Month, Open Label Study of Extended Release Tacrolimus (Envarsus XR®, LCPT) With Mycophenolate, Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (rATG) and Early Steroid Withdrawal in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT03828682]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-21Recruiting
Prograf/Envarsus Conversion Study in Liver Transplant Recipients to Improve Side Effects, Adherence and Quality of Life: A Single-centre Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05655273]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-01Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab to That of Calcineurin Inhibitors in Children With Steroid Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome [NCT02382575]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-03-15Recruiting
Single Center, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled, Cross Over Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic and Bioavailability of Envarsus® in Comparison to Advagraf® in de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT03241043]Phase 320 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
A Two Step Approach to Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients in Remission From HLA Partially-Matched Related Donors-Effect of Maternal Donors on Outcomes [NCT01871441]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-17Terminated(stopped due to Trial was closed due to poor accrual.)
To Compare the Efficacy of Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil for the Initial Therapy of Active Lupus Nephritis [NCT00371319]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Targeting Cross-presentation With Peginterferon Alfa-2a to Enhance Anti-leukemic Responses After Allogeneic Transplantation in High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02328755]Phase 1/Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Use of Sublingual Tacrolimus in Adult Blood and Marrow Transplant Patients: a Pilot Study [NCT04041219]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-17Completed
Killer Immunoglobulin-like Receptor (KIR) Incompatible Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (SCT) for AML With Monosomy 7, -5/5q-, High FLT3-ITD AR, or Refractory and Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) in Children: A Children's Oncolo [NCT00553202]Phase 2158 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation as Second Transplantation for Patients With Disease Relapse or Myelodysplasia After Prior Autologous Transplantation [NCT01118013]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Terminated
A Pilot Study Using High Dose Busulfan and Bortezomib as Part of Allogeneic Transplant Conditioning Regimen for High Risk Multiple Myeloma Patients. [NCT01534143]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Terminated(stopped due to Data was not collected, because funding was unavailable to continue study.)
An Open Label, Multi-centre, Prospective Study to Demonstrate Safety and Efficacy of Once Daily Advagraf in Patients Undergoing Kidney or Liver Transplantation in India [NCT02432053]Phase 492 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label Phase II Trial to Compare Prophylaxis of Graft Versus Host Disease With Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Ruxolitinib After Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide [NCT04669210]Phase 2128 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-03Active, not recruiting
Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus vs. Twice-Daily Tacrolimus: Impact on T-Cell Subpopulations and Markers of Renal Tubule-toxicity in Kidney Transplant Patients [NCT03289650]Phase 329 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-05Completed
A Phase I/II Study of a Novel Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00995059]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn
A Pharmacogenetic Trial of Tacrolimus Dosing After Pediatric Transplantation [NCT01655563]Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
T-Cell Replete Haploidentical Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Plus Natural Killer (NK) Cell Transplantation in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Relapsed or Refractory Despite Previous Allogeneic Transplant [NCT01621477]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Study was terminated in August 2016 due to replacement by a new study.)
Prospective Pilot Feasibility Study Comparing Envarsus Once-a-day to Tacrolimus Twice-a-day Immunosuppressive Regimen on Drug Bioavailability in Hispanic First Time Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT03438773]Phase 150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-11Recruiting
A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center, Pilot Study of Envarsus XR® to Examine Safety, Medication Adherence, and Patient Reported Outcomes in Adolescent Renal Transplant Recipients [NCT03266393]Phase 428 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-15Active, not recruiting
Phase 3 Study of Tacrolimus Combined With Prednisone Treatment of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy and Nephrotic Syndrome [NCT00362531]Phase 2/Phase 30 participants Interventional2004-11-30Completed
Prospective Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacogenetic Analysis of Advagraf After Transplantation [NCT01435291]Phase 445 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Pilot Study of Immunosuppression Drug Weaning in Liver Recipients Exhibiting Biomarkers of High Likelihood of Tolerance [NCT01445236]25 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient recruitment)
Phase 1 Pilot Study Using Autologous CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ T Regulatory Cells and Campath-1H to Induce Renal Transplant Tolerance [NCT01446484]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-10-31Recruiting
A Randomized,Multicentre,Prospective Study on the Tacrolimus(FK506)for Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis [NCT01451489]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-13Terminated(stopped due to The recruitment of subject is very difficult)
A Prospective, Pilot Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Tacrolimus Extended-Release (Envarsus XR) to Tacrolimus Immediate-Release on Suppression of Donor-Specific Antibodies in HLA Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT04225988]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-09Active, not recruiting
Conversion From Tacrolimus to Envarsus in Rapid Metabolizers Post Kidney Transplant Protects Against BK Infection [NCT03762473]Phase 289 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-09Completed
A Phase II Trial of Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation From Matched Unrelated Donors in Patients With Advanced Hematologic Malignancies and Hematological Disorders [NCT00544115]Phase 2260 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-10-16Active, not recruiting
Investigating the Links Between Microbiota Composition and Variability Observed in the Pharmacological Response to Immunosuppressive Therapies in Kidney Transplant Patients. [NCT04360031]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-02-10Recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Low Dose Thymoglobulin and Extended Delay of Calcineurin Inhibitor Therapy for Renal Protection After Liver Transplantation [NCT00970073]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Oral Beclomethasone Dipropionate for Prevention of Acute GVHD After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation With Myeloablative Conditioning Regimens [NCT00489203]Phase 2140 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Phase II Study of Timed Sequential Busulfan in Combination With Fludarabine in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT01572662]Phase 2201 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-11Completed
A Multicenter, Open, Single Sequence Crossover Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Tacrolimus Modified Release, FK506E (MR4), Based Immunosuppressive Regimen in Stable Liver Transplant Patients Converted From a Prograf® Based Immunosuppressive Re [NCT00384202]Phase 3112 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
A Two Step Approach to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies Using One Human Leukocyte Antigen Partially-Matched Related Donor [NCT01341301]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label Study of the Effect of a Long-term Calcineurin Inhibitor-free Maintenance Regimen With CellCept and Sirolimus on Preservation of Renal Function and Prevention of Acute Rejection in Recipients of an Orthotropic Liver Transplant [NCT00118742]Phase 4293 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Immediate Versus Extended Release Tacrolimus; Reducing Calcineurin Inhibitor Related Toxicity in Lung Transplantation Patients [NCT05001074]Phase 3145 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-28Recruiting
Open Label Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Immunosuppression With Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil With a Low Exposure Tacrolimus Regimen in Combination With Everolimus in de Novo Renal Transplantation in Elderly Patient [NCT03797196]Phase 4374 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-29Active, not recruiting
Reduced-intensity, Related-donor Allogeneic BMT With Fludarabine, Busulfan, and High-dose Posttransplantation Cyclophosphamide for Hematologic Malignancies [NCT01135329]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Terminated(stopped due to The stopping rule was met and hence the study was closed)
Therapeutic Effect of Tacrolimus on Primary Nephrotic Syndrome in Children [NCT01162005]Phase 477 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
A Prospective, Open-label, Controlled, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Switching Calcineurin Inhibitor to Everolimus After 90 to 150 Days After Kidney Transplantation in Adults, Maintaining Corticosteroid and Mycophenolate Sodium C [NCT01455649]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-11-30Not yet recruiting
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing CsA Versus Tacro After Campath Induction In Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT01346397]170 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2009-04-30Completed
Preservation of Renal Function After Liver Transplant for Patients With Pre-existing Chronic Kidney Disease or Peri-operative Acute Kidney Injury Using Everolimus Plus Mycophenolate Mofetil Immunosuppression Regimen [NCT04258423]Phase 34 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-19Terminated(stopped due to Study was larger than expected and became a burden to faculty and staff resources.)
Prevention of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedma With Tacrolimus [NCT04390685]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-26Active, not recruiting
Astagraf XL® to Understand the Impact of Immunosuppression on De Novo DSA Development and Chronic Immune Activation in Kidney Transplantation [NCT02723591]Phase 4599 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-09Completed
Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) for Devastating Penile and Concomitant Genital Trauma [NCT03240822]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of Funding)
A Phase II Study Of Allogeneic Transplant For Older Patients With AML In First Morphologic Complete Remission Using A Non-Myeloablative Preparative Regimen [NCT00070135]Phase 2121 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
The Use of Campath-1H, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus Followed by Sirolimus Withdrawal in Renal Transplant Patients [NCT00078559]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
A Multi-Center Study of Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With TBI or Fludarabine/TBI for HLA-matched Related Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies With Post Grafting Immunosuppression With Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate M [NCT00089011]Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Single-Center Randomized Controlled Phase II Study of Safety and Efficacy of FK-506 (Tacrolimus) in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [NCT01647945]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study to Determine the Most Promising Postgrafting Immunosuppression for Prevention of Acute GVHD After Unrelated Donor G-CSF Mobilized Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell (G-PBMC) Transplantation Using Nonmyeloablative Conditioning fo [NCT00105001]Phase 2210 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab to That of Calcineurin Inhibitors in Children With Steroid Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome [NCT02438982]Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-08Completed
Safety, Efficacy and Feasibility of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation (Haplo-SCT) Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as an Alternative Donor Source for Patients Who Lack a Matched Sibling/Unrelated Donor Options [NCT03088709]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-18Recruiting
Pilot Study of Total Marrow/Lymphoid Irradiation (TMLI) Conditioning Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HCT) Followed by Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia in Co [NCT03467386]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-19Recruiting
An Open Label Trial Evaluating the Safety and PK Profile of Tacrolimus Inhalation Powder in Adult Lung Transplant Recipients [NCT05501574]Phase 224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-18Recruiting
Tacrolimus In Combination, Tacrolimus Alone Compared (TICTAC Trial): A Prospective Randomized Trial Of Minimized Immunosuppression In Adult Heart Transplant Recipients [NCT00299221]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Tacrolimus Trial for Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) [NCT04646356]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-20Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Trial Evaluating the Use of a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Panobinostat for Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) Prevention [NCT02588339]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-04Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Combination Acthar Gel and Tacrolimus in the Treatment of Steroid Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome [NCT03042637]0 participants Observational2012-01-31Suspended(stopped due to Bb)
Ph 2 Double-blind, Double-dummy, Multicenter, Prospective, Rand Study of PK of LCP-Tacro™ Tablets Once Daily, Compared to Prograf® Caps, Twice Daily, for Prevention of Acute Allograft Rejection in De Novo Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT01666951]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Tacrolimus for Mild Thrombocytopenia in Sjogren's Syndrome [NCT05678335]Phase 2/Phase 354 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-28Not yet recruiting
Multi-center, Open-label, Prospective, Randomized, Parallel Group Study Investigating a Tacrolimus Hexal® Based Regimen Versus a Prograf® Based Regimen in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients [NCT01649427]Phase 473 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-17Completed
The Efficacy of Everolimus With Reduced-dose Tacrolimus Versus Reduced-dose Tacrolimus in Treatment of BK Virus Infection in Kidney Transplantation Recipient [NCT04542733]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-10Recruiting
Provision of TCRγδ T Cells and Memory T Cells Plus Selected Use of Blinatumomab in Naïve T-cell Depleted Haploidentical Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies Relapsed or Refractory Despite Prior Transplantation [NCT02790515]Phase 252 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-07-14Recruiting
Islet Transplantation for Type 1 Diabetic Patients Using the Edmonton Protocol of Steroid Free Immunosuppression (ITN005CT) [NCT00014911]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
A Randomized Trial of Early Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitors (CNI) to Belatacept in Renal Transplant Recipients With Delayed and Slow Graft Function [NCT01837043]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-06-30Recruiting
A Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm, Non-inferiority Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Tacrolimus Modified Release, ADVAGRAF® in Stable Kidney Transplant Patients Converted From a PROGRAF® Based Immunosuppressive Regimen [NCT01839929]Phase 4138 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
A Two Step Approach to Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies [NCT01384513]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-04Completed
A Pilot Study of Post-transplant High Dose Cyclophosphamide (PTCY) as Part of Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis in T-Cell Replete HLA-Mismatched Unrelated Donor (MMUD) Ablative and Reduced Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) for [NCT03128359]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-30Active, not recruiting
TOP-Study (Tacrolimus Organ Perfusion): A Prospective Multicenter Trial for Treatment of Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in Marginal Organs With an ex Vivo Tacrolimus Perfusion [NCT01564095]Phase 2/Phase 325 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Missing evidence of the effectiveness of the study medication)
A Phase III, Randomized, Multicentre, Open-Label, Concentration-Controlled, Safety and Efficacy Study of Voclosporin and Tacrolimus in Renal Transplantation [NCT01586845]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Withdrawn
Phase 4 Study of Proactive Treatment of Tacrolimus Ointment for Adult Facial Seborrheic Dermatitis [NCT01591070]Phase 4104 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Eltrombopag + Tacrolimus in Chinese Refractory or Relapsed Aplastic Anemia Patients [NCT04403321]Phase 2114 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-01Completed
A Randomized Study to Evaluate Antibody Response to an Additional Dose of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination With and Without Immunosuppression Reduction in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT05077254]Phase 2400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-06Recruiting
Belatacept Therapy for the Failing Renal Allograft [NCT01921218]Phase 313 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of a Post-transplantation Switch From Cyclosporin to Tacrolimus Sustained-release Capsules in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Multi-center, Open-label, Uncontrolled Study [NCT02706678]Phase 4105 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-29Completed
Open-Label, Randomized, Comparative, Multi-Center Clinical Trial on the Therapeutic Effect of Tacrolimus (Prograf Cap.®) in Combination With Low-Dose Corticosteroid Compared With High-Dose Corticosteroid Alone in Patients With Minimal-Change Nephrotic Syn [NCT01763580]Phase 4144 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-16Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Prograf (Tacrolimus, FK 506) for the Prevention of Erectile Dysfunction Following Bilateral Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy [NCT00106392]Phase 4131 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Tacrolimus and Sirolimus as Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Non-myeloablative Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00282282]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Non-Myeloablative Conditioning and Transplantation of Partially HLA-Mismatched Bone Marrow for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00134004]Phase 2210 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
A Multicenter Randomized in Primary Livertransplantation Comparing Longterm Renal Function in Recipients Treated With Tacrolimus Alone and Recipients Treated With a Combination Tacrolimus and Sirolimus [NCT01958190]Phase 4196 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-07Completed
A Phase III Randomized, Open-Label Active Comparator-Controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Obinutuzumab in Patients With Primary Membranous Nephropathy [NCT04629248]Phase 3140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-25Recruiting
An Open-label, Concentration-controlled, Randomized, 6-month Study of 'Standard Dose' Tacrolimus + Sirolimus + Corticosteroids Compared to 'Reduced-dose' Tacrolimus + Sirolimus + Corticosteroids in Renal Allograft Recipients [NCT00519116]Phase 4150 participants Interventional2000-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label and Multicenter Trial Comparing Withdrawal of Steroids or Tacrolimus From Sirolimus-based Immunosuppressive Regimen in de Novo Renal Allograft Recipients [NCT00195429]Phase 447 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
The Efficacy of Topical Tacrolimus in the Treatment of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus - a Multi-Center-Trial [NCT00317681]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Conditioning For Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation With Fludarabine Plus Targeted IV Busulfan and GVHD Prophylaxis With Thymoglobulin, Tacrolimus and Methotrexate in Patients With Myeloid Malignancies [NCT00346359]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
AN OPEN, MULTICENTRE, RANDOMISED PARALLEL GROUP CLINICAL STUDY TO COMPARE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TACROLIMUS (FK506) WITH MONOCLONAL ANTI-IL2R ANTIBODIES (DACLIZUMAB) VS TACROLIMUS (FK506) WITH STEROIDS AND EVALUATE PHARMACOKINETICS IN LIVER ALLOGRAFT RECI [NCT00321074]Phase 3101 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
An Open, Multicentre, Randomised, Parallel Group Study to Compare in Marginal Old-for-old Renal Transplant Patients the Safety and Efficacy of Two Treatments: Sequential Mycophenolate Mofetil/Delayed Tacrolimus Plus Steroids vs Tacrolimus Plus Mycophenola [NCT00321113]Phase 3142 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
A Pilot Study to Investigate Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Everolimus in Patients Treated With Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression in De Novo Kidney Transplantation [NCT00325325]Phase 240 participants Interventional2006-01-31Recruiting
ALLOGENEIC MARROW OR PERIPHERAL BLOOD STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION FOR AGNOGENIC MYELOID METAPLASIA WITH MYELOFIBROSIS [NCT00002792]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1996-06-30Completed
A Two Step Approach to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies Using Two Related Donors [NCT01532635]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
A 2 Step Approach to Haploidentical Transplant Using Radiation-Based Reduced Intensity Conditioning [NCT05031897]Phase 267 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-25Recruiting
Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant for Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00003572]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-08-31Completed
"Phase I Study of T Cell Depleted (TCD) Partially Matched Related Donor (PMRD) Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for High Risk Hematologic Diseases Using Intense Pre and Post Transplant Immunosuppression and Megadose CD34 Veto Cells" [NCT00004904]Phase 10 participants Interventional1999-10-31Completed
Unrelated Bone Marrow Transplantation With Cyclophosphamide and Total Body Irradiation For Hematologic Malignancies and Bone Marrow Failure States [NCT00002809]Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1996-08-31Completed
A Multi-Center, Open Label, Randomized, Active Controlled Phase II/III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Processed Unrelated Bone Marrow in Patients With Acute or Chronic Leukemia [NCT00004255]Phase 2/Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-03-31Completed
An Open-Label, Comparative Study of the Effect of Sirolimus Versus Standard Treatment on Clinical Outcomes and Histologic Progression of Allograft Nephropathy in High Risk Pediatric Renal Transplant Patients [NCT00005113]Phase 3102 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Inability to meet the accrual target of 213.)
TheRapeutic Effect of Different immunosuppressAnts on Non-Thymoma Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: a Real-world Study [NCT04182984]200 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2019-11-04Recruiting
A Prospective, Open-label, Randomized Trial Comparing Prograf and Neoral Use in Kidney Transplant Recipients of Hispanic Ethnicity [NCT00983645]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient funding)
Transplantation of Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cells for the Treatment of Hematological Malignancies [NCT00281879]Phase 2200 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Terminated
De Novo Everolimus Versus Tacrolimus in Combination With Mofetil Mycophenolate and Low Dose Corticosteroids to Reduce Tacrolimus Induced Nephrotoxicity in Liver Transplantation: a Prospective, Multicentric, Randomised Study [NCT02909335]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Withdrawn
A 3-Arm Randomized Phase II Study of Standard-of-Care vs. Bortezomib Based Graft-Versus-Host Disease Regimen for Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients Lacking HLA-matched Related Donors [NCT01754389]Phase 2138 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Pilot Trial of Vorinostat Plus Tacrolimus and Methotrexate to Prevent Graft Versus Host Disease Following Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT01789255]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Treatment-Refractory Crohn's Disease: A Phase 2 Study [NCT01570348]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-17Terminated(stopped due to Annual accrual goal not met)
A Randomized Prospective Trial of Conversion to Everolimus Therapy From Calcineurin Inhibitor Based Maintenance Immunosuppression in Association With Mycophenolic Acid in Liver Transplantation: Examination of Impact on Long Term Renal Function. [NCT01936519]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-16Completed
A Phase II Trial of Non-Myeloablative (NMA) Conditioning and Transplantation of Partially HLA-Mismatched/Haploidentical Related or Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD) Bone Marrow for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Severe Aplastic Anemia [NCT02833805]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
Effectiveness and Safety of Tacrolimus Combined With Low-dose Prednisone for Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis: A Real-world Study [NCT04768465]160 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2021-01-01Recruiting
A Phase II, Parallel Group, Randomized, Multicentre, Open Label Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in De Novo Pediatric Allograft Recipients Treated With an Advagraf® or Prograf® Based Immunosuppressive Regimen, Including a Long-Term Foll [NCT01614665]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-03Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Topical Tacrolimus 0.05% in the Treatment of Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease [NCT01977781]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
A Prospective Randomised, Open-labeled, Trial Comparing Sirolimus-Containing Versus mTOR-Inhibitor-Free Immunosuppression in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT00355862]Phase 3525 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Gemcitabine/Clofarabine/Busulfan and Allogeneic Transplantation for Aggressive Lymphomas [NCT01701986]Phase 1/Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-10-25Active, not recruiting
Hematopoietic Bone Marrow Transplantation for Patients With High-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Using Related HLA-Mismatched Donors: A Trial Using Radiolabeled Anti-CD45 Antibody Co [NCT00589316]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-05Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to loss of funding)
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Lindioil (Indigo Naturalis Oil Extract) Ointment to Protopic® (Tacrolimus 0.1%) Ointment in Treating Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Evaluator-blind, Crossover, Active-Controlled Trial [NCT03614221]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-03Completed
A Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Tacrolimus ER Dosing in Obese Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT02444143]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Open Randomized Single Centre Clinical Trial to Evaluate Methylprednisolone Pulses and Tacrolimus in Patients With Severe Lung Injury Secondary to COVID-19 [NCT04341038]Phase 384 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-01Recruiting
APPLES: A Prospective Pediatric Longitudinal Evaluation To Assess The Long Term Safety Of Tacrolimus Ointment For The Treatment Of Atopic Dermatitis [NCT00368719]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to withdrawn due to contractual issues)
Once-daily Regimen With Envarsus® to Optimize Immunosuppression Management and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT02954198]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-01Completed
Dosing Requirements of Astagraf XL® in African American Kidney Transplant Recipients Converted From Twice-daily Tacrolimus [NCT02953873]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-05Completed
An Open-Label, First-in-human, Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study of 1-Month Sustained-Release Injectable Tacrolimus in Healthy Subjects [NCT03626714]Early Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-16Completed
A Multi-center Phase III Study Comparing Myeloablative to Nonmyeloablative Transplant Conditioning in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT00322101]Phase 325 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
First Tacrolimus Dose Trough Level is Better Than CYP3A5 Genotyping in Tacrolimus Dose Prediction [NCT02356146]60 participants (Anticipated)Observational2012-01-31Recruiting
An Open Label Assessment of the Effect of Coadministration of Posaconazole or Pantoprazole on Systemic Exposure of F901318 and the Effect of F901318 on the Single Dose Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine A in Healthy Male and Female Subjects [NCT03095547]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to study no longer required in current format)
Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of a Reduced Immunosuppressive Therapy With Tacrolimus Once Daily in Comparison to Standard Triple Immunosuppression in Senior Renal Transplant Recipients [NCT02453867]Phase 4400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-12-31Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Cyclic On-off and Continuous Excimer Laser Treatment for Vitiligo: A Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial [NCT03047733]12 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-21Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Combined With Tacrolimus in the Treatment of Intermediate-to-high Risk Primary Membranous Nephropathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT05532111]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial of Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Versus Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide/Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil in Non-Myeloablative/Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (BMT C [NCT03959241]Phase 3428 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-25Active, not recruiting
Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Evaluating Two Induction Therapies With Simulect® Versus ATG® Fresenius Associated With Tacrolimus and Myfortic® in the Prevention of Treatment Failure, in Sensitized Renal Transplant [NCT02377193]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation as Initial Salvage Therapy for Patients With Primary Induction Failure Acute Myeloid Leukemia Refractory to High-Dose Cytarabine-Based Induction Chemotherapy [NCT02441803]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-14Active, not recruiting
Prospective, Rand, Open-label, Single-center, 2 Sequence, 3 Period Crossover Study to Compare the Steady State PK of Once-Daily-Extended Release LCP-Tacro to Generic Tacrolimus Capsules Twice Daily in Stable A A Renal Transplant pt. [NCT01962922]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
A Phase I/II Study Evaluating Escalating Doses of 211At-Labeled Anti-CD45 MAb BC8-B10 (211At-BC8-B10) Followed by Related Haplo-Identical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for High-Risk Acute Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT03670966]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-10Recruiting
Cross-validation of the Finger Prick Dried Blood Spot Assay Method With the Established Whole Blood Method for Quantitative Determination of Tacrolimus Blood Concentrations in Transplant Patients [NCT02377609]108 participants (Actual)Observational2013-10-31Terminated(stopped due to DBS method not be validated against the standard of care venepuncture method due to quality of blood sample and variable tacrolimus extraction)
The Effect of Human Leukocyte Antigen Macthing on Guiding Tacrolimus Regimen [NCT03147157]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-31Not yet recruiting
Clinical Outcome of Delayed or Standard Prograf Together With Induction Therapy Followed by Conversion to Advagraf in Donation After Cardiac (or Circulatory) Death (DCD) Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Clinical Trial [NCT03644485]Phase 4284 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-21Completed
Phase 4 Study: Comparison of Myfortic and Early Rapamycin Conversion vs. Low-Dose Tacrolimus in Preventing Acute Rejection and Chronic Allograft Fibrosis: A Protocol Biopsy Directed Approach [NCT00896012]Phase 458 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Effectiveness of Mycophenolate Mofetil Combined With Tacrolimus for Steroid Tapering in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Prospective, Random Control, Open-label, Single Center Clinical Trial [NCT05916781]Phase 4220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-01Recruiting
Interventional Multicentre Pharmacokinetic Study of Adoport® (Tacrolimus) in Patients With de Novo Kidney Transplantation [NCT03076151]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-12Completed
A Non-Randomized, Open-Label, Three-Part, Drug-Drug Interaction Study to Evaluate the Effects of EDP-938 on the Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus, Dabigatran, Rosuvastatin and Midazolam in Healthy Subjects [NCT04498741]Phase 189 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-08Completed
A 12-month, Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate Efficacy/Safety and Evolution of Renal Function of Everolimus in Co-exposure With Tacrolimus in de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT01551212]Phase 4339 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-24Completed
Reduced-Intensity Preparative Regiment With Fludarabine, Busulfan, And Alemtuzumab (Campath 1H) Followed By Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant For Malignant And Non-Malignant Hematological Diseases [NCT00579111]Phase 1/Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Terminated(stopped due to slow accrual)
Immune Monitoring and Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Withdrawal in Low Risk Recipients of Kidney Transplantation [NCT01517984]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Absence of equipoise on the basis of predetermined stopping rules.)
Addition of Etanercept and Extracorporeal Photopheresis to Standard GVHD Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Reduced Intensity Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant [NCT00639717]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Sirolimus, Tacrolimus and Thymoglobulin, as Graft-versus-Host Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT00589563]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Optimization of NULOJIX® (Belatacept) Usage as a Means of Avoiding CNI and Steroids in Renal Transplantation (CTOT-10) [NCT01436305]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Secondary to safety concerns plus change in Campath® (alemtuzumab) availability.)
A Two Step Approach to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies in Remission From HLA Partially-Matched Related Donors [NCT01350245]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Busulfan and Cyclophosphamide Followed By Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation In Patients With Hematological Malignancies [NCT01685411]5 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Terminated
A Phase 1/2 Trial Evaluating Treatment of Emergent Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD) With AP1903 After Planned Donor Infusions (DLIs) of T-cells Genetically Modified With the iCasp9 Suicide Gene in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies [NCT01875237]Phase 1/Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-27Terminated
Topical 0.03% Tacrolimus Versus Systemic Mycophenolate Mofetil for Preventing Graft Rejection After Repeat Keratoplasty: One-year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04147390]Phase 2/Phase 358 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-30Recruiting
A Phase I, Open-Label, Crossover, Drug Interaction Study of Apixaban With Cyclosporine and Tacrolimus in Healthy Volunteers [NCT03083782]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-18Completed
Phase 2 Study of Planned Donor Lymphocyte Infusion After Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT01518153]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Terminated(stopped due to Objectives not met.)
An Exploratory Evaluation of Early Use of Everolimus (EVE) on Tacrolimus (TAC)-Based Immunosuppressive Regiment vs. Mycophenolate Sodium (MPS) on Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection in Renal Transplant Recipients. [NCT01927588]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-08-31Not yet recruiting
A 12 Month Single-center, Open Label, Randomized, Comparative Study to Evaluate Envarsus XL Steroid-free Rabbit Anti-thymocyte Globulin Induction on Renal Function and Health-related Quality of Life Following Liver Transplantation [NCT03828058]Phase 2110 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-01Completed
A Novel Immunosuppression Intervention for the Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) [NCT01884571]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Autologous Versus Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) for Patients With Chemosensitive Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Beyond First Complete Response or First Partial Response (BMT CTN #0202) [NCT00096460]Phase 2/Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Terminated(stopped due to lower than anticipated accrual)
Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies Using Related, HLA-Haploidentical Donors: A Phase II Trial of Combined Immunosuppression Before and After Transplantation [NCT00049504]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
A Phase IV, Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Comparative Analysis, Single-center Study of Pulse Wave Velocity Evaluation, Tacrolimus TTR and Co-efficient of Tacrolimus Variation of African American Kidney Recipients Receiving Standard of Care Immediat [NCT03841097]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-11Recruiting
Proteomics Combined With Metabolomics Studies on the Efficacy of Telitacicept in Chinese Patients of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [NCT05666336]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-31Recruiting
A Pilot Study of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Pediatric and Adolescent-Young Adults Patients With High Risk Solid Tumors [NCT04530487]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-19Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Selective Depletion of CD45RA+ T Cells From Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts for the Prevention of GVHD in Children [NCT01858740]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-17Completed
Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetic Patients Using the UIC Protocol, Phase 3 [NCT00679042]Phase 321 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-05Active, not recruiting
An Exploratory Double-blind, Randomized, Vehicle-controlled, Paired Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Concomitant Use of Elidel Cream 1% and Cutivate Cream 0.05% in Patients With Severe Lesions of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) [NCT00119158]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation For Relapsed Hodgkin's or Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma After Autologous Transplantation ( A BMT Study) [NCT00121186]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Terminated(stopped due to poor accrual)
Optimization of NULOJIX® (Belatacept) Usage as a Means of Minimizing CNI Exposure in Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation (CTOT-15) [NCT01790594]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual within enrollment time period: projected accrual goal not achieved.)
A Phase IIb, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Concentration Controlled, Safety Study of ISA247 (Voclosporin) and Tacrolimus (Prograf®) in De Novo Renal Transplant Patients [NCT00270634]Phase 2334 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Randomized Open Label Study Comparing the Metabolic Control of Kidney Transplant Recipients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Either Prograf or Neoral as Part of a ATG Induction, Prednisone Free and Monitored MMF Immunosuppressive Regimen. [NCT00296296]Phase 429 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Phase I/II Trial of Bortezomib (Velcade) in Addition to Tacrolimus and Methotrexate to Prevent Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) After Mismatched Allogeneic Non-Myeloablative Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00369226]Phase 1/Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Cyclophosphamide Followed by Intravenous Busulfan as Conditioning for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Myelofibrosis, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, or Myelodysplastic Syndrome. [NCT00445744]52 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Steroid and Tacrolimus Avoidance Using NULOJIX® (Belatacept) in Renal Transplantation (CTOT-16) [NCT01856257]Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Safety: Stopping rule not met.)
A Multi-center Interventional Study to Assess Pharmacokinetics, Effectiveness and Tolerability of Prolonged-release Tacrolimus After Paediatric Kidney Transplantation [NCT06057545]Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-25Recruiting
Advancing Transplantation Outcomes in Children (CTOT-41) [NCT06055608]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Not yet recruiting
Effect of Azole/Echinocandin Use on Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics in Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT06044558]507 participants (Actual)Observational2022-09-01Completed
Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Sublingual Versus Oral Tacrolimus Administration in Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation [NCT00629122]Phase 45 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
A Pilot Study Comparing Two Different Sirolimus-based Transition Regimens in African-American Renal Transplant Recipients [NCT01005706]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Tacrolimus vs Prednisolone for the Treatment Minimal Change Disease [NCT00982072]Phase 452 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
The Combination of High-dose Dexamethasone and Tacrolimus Versus High-dose Dexamethasone as the First-Line Treatment of Newly-diagnosed Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Open-label Trial [NCT04747080]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Recruiting
A Phase 1/2 Multi-Center Trial of Vorinostat for Graft vs Host Disease Prevention in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults Undergoing Allogeneic Blood and Marrow Transplantation [NCT03842696]Phase 1/Phase 249 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-04Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Evaluation of Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitor Treatment to Sirolimus Treatment Versus Continued Calcineurin Inhibitor Treatment in Liver Allograft Recipients Undergoing Maintenance Therapy [NCT00086346]Phase 3607 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Terminated
The Therapy of Tacrolimus Combined With Entecavir on HBV Associated Glomerulonephritis : A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Single-blind Trial. [NCT03062813]Phase 4112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-01Recruiting
Comparison of the Efficacy of Tacrolimus 0.1% Ointment vs Calcipotriol/Betamethasone in Combination With NBUVB in Treatment of Vitiligo [NCT04440371]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-21Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of High-Dose Deoxyazacytidine, Busulfan, and Cyclophosphamide With Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00002831]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-08-01Completed
A Multicenter, Open, Single Sequence Crossover Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Tacrolimus Modified Release, FK506E (MR4), Based Immunosuppressive Regimen in Stable Kidney Transplant Patients Converted From a Prograf® Based Immunosuppressive R [NCT00384137]Phase 3128 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Pilot Study of JAK Inhibitor Therapy Followed by Reduced Intensity Haploidentical Transplantation for Patients With Myelofibrosis [NCT04370301]Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-09Recruiting
A Phase 1b, Multicenter, Dose Escalation, Evaluation of Safety and Tolerability of ASP7317 for Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration [NCT03178149]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-13Recruiting
A Prospective, Pilot Trial to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of Everolimus for the Prevention of BK and CMV Viremia in HLA Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT01911546]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Mechanisms and Treatment of Chronic Allograft Injury (CAI) Due to Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Toxicity [NCT01473732]2 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Terminated(stopped due to terminated after 2 patients due to difficulty in enrollment)
A Multi-center Phase II Trial Randomizing Novel Approaches for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prevention Compared to Contemporary Controls (BMT CTN #1203; Progress I) [NCT02208037]Phase 2279 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Sequential Islet Transplantation With Steroid Free Immunosuppression for Type 1 Diabetes [NCT00446264]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation With Fludarabine, Melphalan and Low Dose Total Body Irradiation [NCT01529827]Phase 294 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-28Completed
A Steady-state Pharmacokinetic Comparison Of All FK-506 Formulations [NCT02339246]Phase 332 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Rapamycin for Prevention of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease [NCT00623012]Phase 1/Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual)
A Pilot Study of an Immunosuppressive and Myeloablative Preparative Regimen for Allogeneic Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) for Severe Sickle Cell Disease [NCT01279616]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Terminated(stopped due to PI moving to a different institution.)
Combined T Cell Depleted Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell and Unrelated Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Using a Total Lymphoid Irradiation Based Preparative Regimen [NCT02199041]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-11Terminated(stopped due to The study was halted early due to slow accrual.)
Dose-Intense Yttrium-90 Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin)-Containing Non-Myeloablative Conditioning for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in B-cell Malignancies [NCT01490723]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A 24-month, Single Center, Pilot, Open Label, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Calcineurin-inhibitor Reduction With Conversion at 2 Months to Reduced Dose Tacrolimus/Everolimus in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients Following Campath® [NCT01935128]Phase 455 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-03Completed
Phase 2, Open-Label Study to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of the Combination of Simeprevir (TMC435), Daclatasvir (BMS-790052) and Ribavirin (RBV) in Subjects With Recurrent Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1b Infection [NCT01938625]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-12Completed
AGe-adapted Benefits of Envarsus Versus Twice-daily Tacrolimus ImmunosuppressioN druGs After Kidney Transplantation (AGEING) - a Feasibility Study [NCT03005236]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-04-30Not yet recruiting
OPEN-LABEL, MULTICENTRE, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL TO COMPARE THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF ENVARSUS® TABLETS AND ADVAGRAF® CAPSULES ADMINISTERED ONCE DAILY IN ADULT DE-NOVO KIDNEY TRANSPLANT PATIENTS [NCT02500212]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Tacrolimus, Sirolimus and Ustekinumab vs. Tacrolimus and Sirolimus for the Prevention of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT01713400]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-25Completed
Clofarabine Pre-conditioning Followed by Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Non-remission Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04002115]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-03Terminated(stopped due to terminated due to low accrual)
Itacitinib to Prevent Graft Versus Host Disease [NCT04127721]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-22Withdrawn(stopped due to 0 ACTUAL Enrollment must have Overall Recruitment Status)
Global Multicentre Kidney Transplant Advagraf Conversion Registry. A Non-interventional Post-authorisation Study (PAS) [NCT02555787]4,430 participants (Actual)Observational2015-03-05Completed
In Vivo Treg Expansion and Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis With IL-2, Sirolimus, and Tacrolimus Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT01927120]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-25Completed
Pre-Transplant Immunosuppression and Related Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Severe Hemoglobinopathies [NCT04776850]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-29Withdrawn(stopped due to Competing protocol opened in Adult SCT that will include pediatric patients and is now multi-center. No patients enrolled on study.)
An Evaluation of Converting Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients From Tacrolimus to Envarsus to Limit Neurological Adverse Events and Improve Quality of Life [NCT03263052]40 participants (Actual)Observational2017-07-01Completed
The Effect of Conversion to Once-Daily Envarsus® on the Neurologic Toxicity Burden in Liver Transplant Recipients [NCT03823768]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-31Active, not recruiting
Pilot Trial of Vorinostat Plus Tacrolimus & Methotrexate to Prevent Graft Versus Host Disease Following Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Transplant [NCT01790568]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
A Randomized Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus and Corticosteroids in Comparison With Mycophenolate Mofetil and Corticosteroids in Subjects With Class III/IV±V Lupus Nephritis [NCT02630628]Phase 4130 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-05Active, not recruiting
Immunosuppressive Drugs and Gut Microbiome: Pharmacokinetic- and Microbiome Diversity Effects [NCT04207177]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-30Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Pilot Study of Human Lysozyme Goat Milk in Recipients of Standard Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT03531281]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Administratively withdrawn)
Randomized, Open-Label Trial of Tacrolimus/Everolimus vs. Tacrolimus/Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium to Prevent Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection and Chronic Allograft Injury in Adult, Primary Kidney Transplantation [NCT01680861]Phase 332 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Open, Parallel-controlled, Multi-center Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Capsules and Cyclophosphamide Injection in Treatment of Lupus Nephritis [NCT02457221]Phase 3314 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-10Completed
A Novel Combined Therapy for Refractory Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis [NCT03464435]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-01Completed
Precision Pharmacokinetic-Guided Tacrolimus Dosing to Improve Pediatric Heart Transplant Outcomes [NCT04380311]16 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-01Recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Benefits of EnvarsusXR in Post Liver Transplant [NCT03386305]Phase 2/Phase 335 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-12-13Active, not recruiting
"A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Off-the-shelf NK Cell Administration in Combination With Allogeneic SCT to Decrease Disease Relapse in Patients With High-risk Myeloid Malignancies Undergoing Matched Related, Matched Unrelated, One Antigen Mismatched Unrel [NCT05115630]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-08Recruiting
A Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Benefits and Risks of Conversion of Existing Adolescent Renal Allograft Recipients Aged 12 to Less Than 18 Years of Age to a Belatacept-based Immunosuppressive Regimen as Compared to [NCT04877288]Phase 3102 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-21Recruiting
A Phase IB-II Study Of High-Dose Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide, Abatacept, and Short-Duration Tacrolimus for the Prevention of Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GvHD) Following Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) [NCT04503616]Phase 1/Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-16Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Sorafenib Added to Busulfan and Fludarabine Conditioning Regimen in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory AML Undergoing Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT03247088]Phase 1/Phase 274 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-07-30Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and Transplantation of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-Matched, Partially HLA-mismatched, HLA-haploidentical or Matched Unrelated Bone Marrow for Patients With Refractory SLE [NCT02080195]Phase 1/Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-13Terminated(stopped due to Study was unable to accrue subjects)
A Three-Part Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Potential Drug Interaction Between ACH-0144471 and Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus, Antacids, and Omeprazole in Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT05109390]Phase 172 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-27Completed
A Multicenter Comparative and Efficacy Study of ACTHar Gel Alone or in Combination With Tacrolimus in Fibrillary Glomerulopathy [NCT04080076]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-12Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was updated and issued a new NCT number.)
Safety and Efficacy of Basiliximab, Delayed Dose Tacrolimus Plus ECMPA, Versus Standard Dose Tacrolimus, ECMPA Plus Corticosteroids in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplant [NCT02123108]Phase 459 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Tacrolimus as Treatment of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema [NCT04541290]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-22Completed
A National, Multi-center, Randomized, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Combined With Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium Compared to the Standard Treatment Combining Tacrolimus and Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium in d [NCT01625377]Phase 3188 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
A 24-month, Multi-center, Single Arm, Prospective Study to Evaluate Renal Function, Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Everolimus in Combination With Reduced Exposure Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus in Paediatric Liver Transplant Recipients. [NCT01598987]Phase 356 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Two Different Conditioning Regimens Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) for Children With Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia (JMML) [NCT01824693]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-24Completed
A Long-term Follow up Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Transplant Recipients Treated With Modified Release Tacrolimus, FK506E (MR4), Based Immunosuppression Regimen [NCT02118896]Phase 3850 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-24Completed
Multicenter, Prospective, Open-label, Controlled, Randomized, Parallel Groups Study to Evaluate the Renal Function of Adult Liver Transplant Recipients Treated With Two Everolimus-based Immunosuppressive Regimens (Tacrolimus Withdrawal vs. Minimization) U [NCT02115113]Phase 378 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-28Completed
Investigation of Potential Drug-drug Interactions Between Faldaprevir and Immunosuppressants (Cyclosporine and Tacrolimus) in Healthy Male and Female Subjects (Open-label, Fixed-sequence Trial) [NCT02016625]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
A Feasibility Study of Myeloablative BEAM Allogeneic Transplantation Followed by Oral Ixazomib Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Relapsed High-Risk Multiple Myeloma [NCT02504359]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-20Completed
Prospective Randomised Marker-based Trial to Assess the Clinical Utility and Safety of Biomarker-guided Immunosuppression Withdrawal in Liver Transplantation [NCT02498977]Phase 4116 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Tacrolimus Ointment 0.1% Versus Placebo in Adults With Facial Non-segmental Vitiligo: a Randomized Double-blind Controlled Study [NCT02466997]Phase 342 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-23Completed
Efficacy of Intralesional Triamcinolone Injection in the Treatment of Vitiligo [NCT03365141]12 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-14Recruiting
Evaluation of the Impact of Tacrolimus-based Immunosuppression on Heidelberg Liver Transplant Cohort (HDTACRO): Study Protocol for an Investigator Initiated, Non-interventional Prospective Study [NCT04444817]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2018-11-22Recruiting
Population Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Children With Nephrotic Syndrome [NCT03347357]Phase 428 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-01Completed
Phase II Single-Arm Open-Label Study Of Reduced-Dose Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide, Abatacept, and Short-Duration Tacrolimus for the Prevention of Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Following Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) [NCT05621759]Phase 292 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-23Recruiting
A Pilot Study of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With High Grade Central Nervous System Malignancies [NCT04521946]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-14Withdrawn(stopped due to No participants enrolled.)
Observationnal Multicenter Study on a Prospective Cohort of Kidney Transplanted Patients Receiving a Year After Transplant an Extended Releasing Tacrolimus-Everolimus Association [NCT03228576]16 participants (Actual)Observational2017-04-14Terminated(stopped due to No recruitment)
Randomized Conversion Of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)+ Kidney Transplant Recipients Of Living Or Standard Criteria Donors At Three Months Post Transplantation To Belatacept With MPA Or Belatacept With Low-Dose Tacrolimus (50% Of Dose) Compared To Patients Rem [NCT02213068]Phase 428 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial of Infliximab (Remicade®) Induction Therapy for Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients (CTOT-19) [NCT02495077]Phase 2290 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-02Completed
A 24 Month, Randomized, Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Concentration-controlled Everolimus Plus Reduced Tacrolimus Compared to Standard Tacrolimus in Recipients of Living Donor Liver Transplants and Long Term Extension to Evaluat [NCT01888432]Phase 3285 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-25Completed
Donor-Alloantigen-Reactive Regulatory T Cell (darTreg) Therapy in Liver Transplantation (RTB-002) [NCT02188719]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-17Terminated(stopped due to The trial could not be completed within the grant timeline.)
Pediatric Blood & Marrow Transplant Consortium (PBMTC) Phase II Myeloablative Haploidentical BMT With Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Pediatric Patients With Hematologic Malignancies [NCT02120157]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-02Completed
12 Month, Multi-center, Open-label, Prospective, Randomized, Parallel Group Study Investigating a Standard Regimen in de Novo Kidney Transplant Patients Versus a Certican® Based Regimen Either in Combination With Cyclosporin A or Tacrolimus [NCT01843348]Phase 3612 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-27Completed
Evaluation of the Benefits and Risks in Maintenance Renal Transplant Recipients Following Conversion to Nulojix® (Belatacept)-Based Immunosuppression [NCT01820572]Phase 3446 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-27Completed
Decitabine Followed by Bone Marrow Transplant and High-Dose Cyclophosphamide for the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Neoplasms [NCT01707004]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-16Completed
Combined HLA-Matched Bone Marrow and Kidney Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma or Other Hematologic Disorders With End Stage Renal Disease [NCT02158052]2 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety on the Use of Belatacept as Compared to Tacrolimus in the Setting of Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction and Rapid Steroid Discontinuation in Deceased Donor Renal Transplant Recipients With a Focus on [NCT02152345]Phase 457 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
A 12-month Randomized, Multiple Dose, Open-label, Study Evaluating Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) and Efficacy of an Anti-CD40 Monoclonal Antibody, CFZ533, in Combination With Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) and Corticosteroid [NCT02217410]Phase 1/Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-05Completed
A 24 Month, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Safety and Efficacy Study of Concentration-controlled Everolimus With Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor vs Mycophenolate With Standard Calcineurin Inhibitor in de Novo Renal Transplantation [NCT01950819]Phase 42,037 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-03Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00014911 (6) [back to overview]HbA1c Plasma Laboratory Values for Participants in the Extended Follow-up Study Phase
NCT00014911 (6) [back to overview]Percent of Participants That Achieved Insulin Independence From First Transplant
NCT00014911 (6) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Detectable Fasting Basal C-Peptide Levels
NCT00014911 (6) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Partial Islet Function One Year Post Final Islet Transplantation.
NCT00014911 (6) [back to overview]Serum Creatinine Levels for Participants in the Extended Follow-up Study Phase
NCT00014911 (6) [back to overview]Percent of Participants That Achieved Insulin Independence With Adequate Control of Blood Glucose Levels at One Year Post Final Islet Transplantation.
NCT00038948 (2) [back to overview]Nankivell Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
NCT00038948 (2) [back to overview]First Occurrence of Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection, Graft Loss, or Death.
NCT00039377 (5) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival
NCT00039377 (5) [back to overview]5 Year Overall Survival for Autologous & Allogeneic Transplant Groups
NCT00039377 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved a BCR-ABL Response at 12 Months
NCT00039377 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00039377 (5) [back to overview]5 Year Disease-free Survival for Autologous & Allogeneic Transplant Groups
NCT00043979 (14) [back to overview]Best Response Post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant EOCH (Etoposide, Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide, and Doxorubicin)
NCT00043979 (14) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT00043979 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Engraftment
NCT00043979 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Graft Versus Tumor Effect (GVT)
NCT00043979 (14) [back to overview]Median Time to Reach Absolute Neutrophil Count of 500/mm(3)
NCT00043979 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD
NCT00043979 (14) [back to overview]Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Reconstitution
NCT00043979 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants to Complete Conversion to >95% Donor Chimerism
NCT00043979 (14) [back to overview]Median Progression Free Survival
NCT00043979 (14) [back to overview]Two Year Survival Rate for Patients Undergoing Allo-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
NCT00043979 (14) [back to overview]Post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) Radiotherapy
NCT00043979 (14) [back to overview]Median Survival From Date of Progression
NCT00043979 (14) [back to overview]Median Time to Reach a Platelet Count of 50,000/mm(3)
NCT00043979 (14) [back to overview]Early Post Transplantation Relapse
NCT00049504 (3) [back to overview]Donor Engraftment (Chimerism)
NCT00049504 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Grades III-IV Acute GVHD
NCT00049504 (3) [back to overview]Non-relapse-related Mortality
NCT00053989 (4) [back to overview]OS
NCT00053989 (4) [back to overview]Day 100 TRM
NCT00053989 (4) [back to overview]PFS
NCT00053989 (4) [back to overview]Acute GvHD
NCT00058825 (9) [back to overview]2-year Overall Survival
NCT00058825 (9) [back to overview]Median Time to Engraftment With the Isolex/CLINIMACs System
NCT00058825 (9) [back to overview]Time in Days to ANC Engraftment
NCT00058825 (9) [back to overview]Transplant Related Mortality (TRM)
NCT00058825 (9) [back to overview]Acute Graft Versus Host Disease
NCT00058825 (9) [back to overview]Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
NCT00058825 (9) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Engrafted With the Isolex/CLINIMACs System
NCT00058825 (9) [back to overview]2-year Relapse-free Survival
NCT00058825 (9) [back to overview]Donor Chimerism Engraftment of Greater Than 50%
NCT00064701 (15) [back to overview]Graft Survival at One Year
NCT00064701 (15) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Graft Survival at the End of the Study
NCT00064701 (15) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Patient Survival at the End of the Study
NCT00064701 (15) [back to overview]Severity of Acute Rejection
NCT00064701 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Treated Acute Rejection Episodes
NCT00064701 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Multiple Rejection Episodes
NCT00064701 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Requiring Anti-lymphocyte Antibody Therapy for Treatment of Rejection
NCT00064701 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Crossed Over Due to Treatment Failure
NCT00064701 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Failure
NCT00064701 (15) [back to overview]Patient Survival at One Year
NCT00064701 (15) [back to overview]Time to First Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection Episode
NCT00064701 (15) [back to overview]Change From Month 1 in Creatinine Clearance at Month 6 and Month 12
NCT00064701 (15) [back to overview]Change From Month 1 in Serum Creatinine at Month 6 and Month 12
NCT00064701 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure
NCT00064701 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Acute Rejection at 6 and 12 Months
NCT00070135 (3) [back to overview]Non-relapse Mortality (NRM)
NCT00070135 (3) [back to overview]2 Year Disease Free Survival In Unrelated Donor Recipient Group
NCT00070135 (3) [back to overview]2 Year DFS for All Patients
NCT00076570 (2) [back to overview]The Rate of Significant Drug-associated Complications.
NCT00076570 (2) [back to overview]The Rate of Allograft Rejection
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Sirolimus Associated Adverse Events, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Side Effects of Conventional Immunosuppression, Stratified by Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Severe Acute Rejections Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Graft Loss Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants Requiring Anti-lymphocyte Therapy for an Acute Rejection, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Deaths Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Alemtuzumab Associated Adverse Events, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Acute Rejections in All Enrolled Participants
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Acute Rejections in All Enrolled Participants Following Sirolimus Withdrawal
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Change in Renal Function as Measured by Serum Creatinine, Stratified by Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Acute Rejections Between Initiation of Sirolimus Withdrawal and End of Study
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Time From Transplantation to Acute Rejection in Participants for Whom Sirolimus Withdrawal Was Not Initiated
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Time From Transplantation to Acute Rejection in Participants for Whom Acute Rejection Occurred During the 1 Year Post-transplant Period
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Tacrolimus Associated Adverse Events, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status
NCT00086346 (4) [back to overview]Patient and Graft Survival
NCT00086346 (4) [back to overview]Mean Serum Creatinine
NCT00086346 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Adjusted Mean in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
NCT00086346 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With a Biopsy Confirmed Acute Rejection
NCT00089011 (8) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade III/IV GVHD
NCT00089011 (8) [back to overview]Rates of Relapse-related Mortality
NCT00089011 (8) [back to overview]Incidence of Chronic Extensive GVHD
NCT00089011 (8) [back to overview]Rates of Disease Progression
NCT00089011 (8) [back to overview]Incidences of Graft Rejection
NCT00089011 (8) [back to overview]Rate and Duration of Steroid Use for the Treatment of Chronic GVHD
NCT00089011 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00089011 (8) [back to overview]Incidences of Grades II-IV Acute GVHD
NCT00096460 (1) [back to overview]Lymphoma Progression-free Survival
NCT00105001 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Utilizing High-Dose Corticosteroids
NCT00105001 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grades II-IV Acute GVHD
NCT00105001 (5) [back to overview]Number of Non-Relapse Mortalities
NCT00105001 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Surviving Overall
NCT00105001 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Surviving Without Progression
NCT00105235 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Successfully Withdrawn From Immunosuppressants
NCT00105235 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Who Had Graft Loss or Death
NCT00105235 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Who Have Graft Loss or Death
NCT00105235 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Successfully Withdrawn and Remain Off Immunosuppressants
NCT00105235 (5) [back to overview]Number of Events: Immunosuppression-related Complications
NCT00106392 (6) [back to overview]Continence Level as Quantified by Part I of the Prostate Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire
NCT00106392 (6) [back to overview]Erectile Function Domain Score Between Treated and Untreated Groups
NCT00106392 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving Normal Spontaneous Erectile Function as Measured by the Erectile Function (EF) Domain Score
NCT00106392 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Considered Successful Responders to Impotence Medications
NCT00106392 (6) [back to overview]Time Taken to Achieve Normalization of the Erectile Function (EF) Domain Score
NCT00106392 (6) [back to overview]Time to Achieve Response to Impotence Medications
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) and Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Load
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Fasting Serum Glucose Levels
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) of Lymphocyte Subsets
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by Cockcroft-Gault
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by Reciprocal of Serum Creatinine (1/sCr)
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HCRUQ)
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HCRUQ) - 5th Question
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Hematocrit Level
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Hemoglobin Level
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Discontinuation
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Drug Usage
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Efficacy Failure
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With First Biopsy Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (BPCAN)
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With First Clinically Significant Infection
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Level
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Absolute Platelet Levels
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2.0 (V2)
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hypercholesterolemia
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hypertriglyceridemia
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus (NODM)
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Graft Loss
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With First Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) at Month 6
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Died
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With First Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) at Month 3
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by Nankivell Equation at Month 6
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Ordered Categorical Severity of First Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Ordered Categorical Severity of First Biopsy Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (BPCAN)
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Rejection
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Failure
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Reticulocyte Count
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Total Serum Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Levels
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Total White Blood Cells (WBC), Absolute Basophil, Absolute Eosinophil, Absolute Lymphocyte, Absolute Monocyte, Absolute Neutrophil
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Trough Levels of Tacrolimus (TAC)
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]BK Virus (BKV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Load
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
NCT00106639 (40) [back to overview]End-Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist-Transplantation Module (ESRD-SCL)
NCT00113269 (11) [back to overview]Renal Function Abnormalities Based on Creatinine Clearance
NCT00113269 (11) [back to overview]Patient Survival at 12 Months
NCT00113269 (11) [back to overview]Patient Incidence of Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection (BCAR) at 6 Months
NCT00113269 (11) [back to overview]Time to First BCAR
NCT00113269 (11) [back to overview]Overall Graft Survival
NCT00113269 (11) [back to overview]Graft Survival at 12 Months
NCT00113269 (11) [back to overview]Efficacy Failure
NCT00113269 (11) [back to overview]Clinically Treated Acute Rejection
NCT00113269 (11) [back to overview]Overall Patient Survival
NCT00113269 (11) [back to overview]Overall Patient Incidence of BCAR
NCT00113269 (11) [back to overview]Renal Function Abnormalities Based on Serum Creatinine
NCT00118742 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance
NCT00118742 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 6 Months Posttransplant
NCT00118742 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 24 Months Posttransplant
NCT00118742 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 12 Months Posttransplant
NCT00119158 (2) [back to overview]The Time to Clearance of the Disease
NCT00119158 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the m-EASI (Eczema Area Severity Index) Score.
NCT00121186 (2) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00121186 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00129961 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants That Died
NCT00129961 (15) [back to overview]Number of Lesion Free Subjects
NCT00129961 (15) [back to overview]Time to First Biopsy Confirmed New NMSC Lesion.
NCT00129961 (15) [back to overview]Subjects Reporting Incidence of Metastatic Disease Related to NMSC.
NCT00129961 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With New Biopsy-confirmed NMSC: Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) and Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC)
NCT00129961 (15) [back to overview]Spot Urine Protein:Creatinine Ratio
NCT00129961 (15) [back to overview]Serum Creatinine Level
NCT00129961 (15) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Biopsy-Confirmed Acute Rejection
NCT00129961 (15) [back to overview]Grade Distribution of NMSC Lesions
NCT00129961 (15) [back to overview]New Biopsy-Confirmed Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC) Lesions Per Subject Per Year
NCT00129961 (15) [back to overview]Nankivell-Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
NCT00129961 (15) [back to overview]Graft Survival Measured by Graft Loss
NCT00129961 (15) [back to overview]Death Due to NMSC
NCT00129961 (15) [back to overview]Number of Recurrent NMSC Lesions Per Subject-year
NCT00129961 (15) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Discontinue Assigned Therapy
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Cataract - Incident Cataract
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Change in SF-36 Mental Component Score From Baseline to 24 Months
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) - Incident Use of IOP-lowering Medical Therapy (Percentage of Eyes With Uveitis That Were Not Being Treated With IOP-lowering Medical Therapy at Baseline and Underwent IOP Lowering Therapy During the 24 Month Follow-up.
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure - IOP-lowering Surgery
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure - Incident IOP Greater Than or Equal to 30 mm Hg
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure - Incident IOP Greater Than or Equal to 24 mm Hg
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure - Incident IOP Elevation >= 10 mmHg Above Baseline
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Hypertension Diagnosis Requiring Treatment
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Hyperlipidemia - Incident
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Glaucoma - Incident
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Change in SF-36 Physical Component Score From Baseline to 24 Months
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Change in Self-reported Vision-related Function as Measured by the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25) Vision Targeted Composite Score From Baseline to 24 Months
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Uveitis Activity
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Mortality
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Macular Edema
NCT00132691 (17) [back to overview]Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (Change in the Numbers of Letters Read From a Standard ETDRS Eye Chart) From Baseline to 24 Months in Eyes With Uveitis
NCT00134004 (5) [back to overview]Hematologic and Non-hematologic Toxicities as Measured by NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, v 3.0 Weekly Until 1 Year After Transplantation
NCT00134004 (5) [back to overview]Transplant-related Mortality
NCT00134004 (5) [back to overview]Relapse Rate
NCT00134004 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00134004 (5) [back to overview]Graft Failure Rate
NCT00141037 (2) [back to overview]The Difference in Linear Growth by Treatment Assignment at 1 Year Post Kidney Transplantation
NCT00141037 (2) [back to overview]Comparison by Treatment Assignment in the Number of Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejections Within 12 Months Post Kidney Transplantation
NCT00149994 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With an Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) During the First 3 Months Post de Novo Liver Transplantation.
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: Cystatin-C
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: BNP
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: IL-18
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Number of Acute Rejection Episodes by International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Criteria (Pediatric Population)
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Number of Acute Rejection Episodes by International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Criteria
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: T-bars
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: Troponin T
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation and Oxidation: Nitrotyrosine (Pediatric Population)
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation and Oxidation: hsCRP (Pediatric Population)
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation and Oxidation: F2 Isoprostanes (Pediatric Population)
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation and Oxidation: Cystatin-C (Pediatric Population)
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Time to First Acute Rejection Episode Following de Novo Cardiac Transplant
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Successful Steroid Taper or Withdrawal at Weeks 26 and 52
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Number of Patients Requiring Antilymphocyte Antibodies or Steroids for Treatment of Severe Acute Rejection (Pediatric Population)
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Number of Patients Requiring Antilymphocyte Antibodies or Steroids for Treatment of Severe Acute Rejection
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Number of Cardiac Rejection Episodes Requiring Treatment (Pediatric Population)
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Mean Cases of Acute Rejection (MCAR) Per Patient (Pediatric Population)
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Number of Cardiac Rejection Episodes Requiring Treatment
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Mean Cases of Acute Rejection (MCAR) Per Patient
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Successful Steroid Taper or Withdrawal at Weeks 26 and 52 (Pediatric Population)
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Treatment Failure and Crossover for Treatment Failure
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Time to First Acute Rejection Episode Following de Novo Cardiac Transplant (Pediatric Population)
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Treatment Failure and Crossover for Treatment Failure (Pediatric Population)
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]The Change in the Markers of Growth, Apoptosis, Inflammation and Oxidation Measured in Endomyocardial Biopsies
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]The Change in the Markers of Growth, Apoptosis, Inflammation and Oxidation Measured in Endomyocardial Biopsies (Pediatric Population)
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: E-selectin
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: F2 Isoprostanes
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: Fibrinogen
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: GSH/GSSG
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: Homocysteine
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: hsCRP
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: IL-6
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: MCP-1
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: Nitrotyrosine
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: Osteopontin
NCT00157014 (36) [back to overview]Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: s-ICAM
NCT00163657 (2) [back to overview]Freedom From HCV Recurrence Within First Year That Requires HCV Antiviral Therapy and Freedom From Treatment Failure
NCT00163657 (2) [back to overview]Freedom From Acute Rejection or HCV Recurrence or Treatment Failure
NCT00166712 (1) [back to overview]The Incidence of Biopsy-proven Acute Allograft Rejection During the First 12 Months of Transplant.
NCT00183248 (7) [back to overview]Number of Chronic Allograft Nephropathies
NCT00183248 (7) [back to overview]Graft Survival at Three Years Post-Transplant
NCT00183248 (7) [back to overview]Overall Participant Survival at One Year Post Kidney Transplant
NCT00183248 (7) [back to overview]Number of Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) Events
NCT00183248 (7) [back to overview]Participant Survival at Three Years Post Kidney Transplant
NCT00183248 (7) [back to overview]Overall Kidney Graft Survival at One Year Post-Transplant
NCT00183248 (7) [back to overview]Number of Kidney Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection
NCT00195429 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Biopsy Confirmed Acute Rejection at 12 Months Follow up.
NCT00195429 (2) [back to overview]Creatinine Clearance Rate
NCT00240994 (1) [back to overview]The Proportion of Participants With Graft Loss or Death Within 12 Months Post Kidney Transplantation
NCT00260208 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Combined Endpoint of Death or Graft Loss or Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
NCT00260208 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Combined Endpoint of Death or Graft Loss or Fibrosis Score (FS) ≥ 2
NCT00260208 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Death or Re-transplantation Due to Recurrence of Hepatitis C Cirrhosis
NCT00260208 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Fibrosis Score 2 or Above [Ishak-Knodell Fibrosis Score (FS) ≥ 2] Within 1 Year Post-transplant
NCT00260208 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Fibrosis Score 2 or Above [Ishak-Knodell Fibrosis Score (FS) ≥ 2] Within 1 Year Post-transplant (Intent to Treat Population)
NCT00260208 (10) [back to overview]Log-transformed Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Values up to 1 Year Post Transplant
NCT00260208 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Death, Graft Loss, Death or Graft Loss, Graft Loss With Re-transplantation
NCT00260208 (10) [back to overview]Mean Value of Liver Function Tests at 1 Year Post-transplantation
NCT00260208 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treated Acute Rejection, Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), and Sub-clinical Rejection
NCT00260208 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Fibrosing Cholestatic Hepatitis
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Ratio of Serum LDL Cholesterol to Serum HDL Cholesterol <3.5 by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Ratio of Total Serum Cholesterol to Serum HDL Cholesterol <5 by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Ratio of Fasting Serum Proinsulin (Pmol/L) to Insulin (Pmol/L) by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Serum Glucose (mg*h/dL) Measured During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Trough Levels of Tacrolimus (ng/mL) by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Total Cholesterol Levels by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Tofacitinib Concentrations in Plasma (ng/mL) by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Short-Form 36 Version 2 (SF-36 v2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores by Visit and Scale
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]SF-36 v2 Subscale Scores by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Serum Triglyceride Levels by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Ratio of Serum LDL Level to HDL Level by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Ratio of Total Serum Cholesterol Level to HDL Level by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Reciprocal of Serum Creatinine
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Serum Creatinine Levels
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]End Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist (ESRD-SCL) Transplanation Module Scores by Visit and Scale
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) Deooxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Levels Determined Using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Ordered Categorical Severity of First BPCAN
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Absolute Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 8+, CD19+, CD4+, and CD56+ Flouresence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) Counts (Cells/uL) by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Cumulative Percentage of Participants With a First Antibody-Mediated Rejection or First BPAR
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SF-36 v2 Subscale Scores by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SF-36 v2 MCS and PCS Scores by Visit and Scale
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in ESRD-SCL Transplantation Module Scores by Visit and Scale
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Levels by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Calculated GFR Using the Nankivell Equation (mL/Min)
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Calculated GFR Using Cockcroft-Gault Equation (mL/Min)
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Levels by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]BK Virus (BKV) DNA Levels Determined Using PCR by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Hypercholesterolemia
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Fasting Serum Glucose Levels (mg/dL) by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]HOMA Insulin Resistance (IR) by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA)-%B by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants Surviving by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Infections by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With First Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With First Biopsy-Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (BPCAN) by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Graft Survival by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus, Definition 1 (NODM-1) by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With NODM, Definition 2 (NODM-2) by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Rejection by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Levels by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU) Questionnaire
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring Anti-Hypertensive Medication by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring Diabetes Agents (Oral Hypoglycemic Agents, Anti-Diabetic Agents, or Insulin) by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring Lipid-Lowering Agents by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With BKV DNA Determined Using PCR by Specific Cutoff Categories (in Number of Copies/PCR) and Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]AUC of Serum Insulin (microU*h/mL) Measured During OGTT by Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With EBV DNA Determined Using PCR by Specific Cutoff Categories (in Number of Copies/PCR) and Visit
NCT00263328 (52) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Hypertriglyceridemia by Visit
NCT00267189 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Discontinuation of Study Medication
NCT00267189 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Cockcroft-Gault Calculated Creatinine Clearance (CrCl)
NCT00267189 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Efficacy Failure (Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection [BPAR], Graft Loss or Death)
NCT00270634 (7) [back to overview]Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, or Hyperglycemia
NCT00270634 (7) [back to overview]To Demonstrate a 5% Improvement in Renal Function as Measured by Iothalamate Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
NCT00270634 (7) [back to overview]The Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic Relationship Between Voclosporin and Calcineurin Inhibition (CNi), or Tacrolimus and Calcineurin Inhibition
NCT00270634 (7) [back to overview]A Composite of Biopsy-proven Chronic Rejection Graft Loss, Death, or Lost to Follow up.
NCT00270634 (7) [back to overview]Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
NCT00270634 (7) [back to overview]Graft Survival
NCT00270634 (7) [back to overview]Patient Survival
NCT00275509 (3) [back to overview]6-month Acute Cellular-mediated Rejection Rate (CMR)
NCT00275509 (3) [back to overview]6-month Cumulative Rejection Incidence (Either CMR, AMR or Both)
NCT00275509 (3) [back to overview]6-month Acute Antibody-mediated Rejection Rate (AMR)
NCT00278512 (1) [back to overview]Survival
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Graft Survival
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants Receiving Anti-lymphocyte Antibody Therapy for Acute Rejection
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Time to Event for Graft Non-survival
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Patient Survival
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Safety as Assessed by Adverse Events, Laboratory Parameters and Vital Signs
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Tacrolimus (Tmax)
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Primary Reason for Graft Loss
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Multiple Rejection Episodes
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Minimum Observed Concentration of Tacrolimus (Cmin)
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Concentration of Tacrolimus (Cmax)
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Grade of Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection Episodes
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) for Tacrolimus
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Time to First Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Time to Event for Patient Non-survival
NCT00282243 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Treated Acute Rejection Episodes
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) for Tacrolimus
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Time to First Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Time to Event for Graft Non-survival
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Patient Survival
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Multiple Rejection Episodes
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Grade of Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection Episodes
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants Receiving Anti-lymphocyte Antibody Therapy for Acute Rejection
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Graft Survival
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Treated Acute Rejection Episodes
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Tacrolimus (Tmax)
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Safety as Assessed by Clinical Signs and Symptoms, Laboratory Parameters and Diagnostic Tests
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Primary Reason for Graft Loss
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Minimum Observed Concentration of Tacrolimus (Cmin)
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Concentration of Tacrolimus (Cmax)
NCT00282256 (16) [back to overview]Time to Event for Patient Non-survival
NCT00282282 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD (aGVHD) Developing by Day 100 Following Non-myeloablative PBSC Transplantation Using Tacrolimus and Sirolimus.
NCT00282282 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥90 Percent Donor-derived Hematopoeisis Around 100 Days Post Transplantation
NCT00282282 (3) [back to overview]Disease Response.
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Time to Event for Patient Non Survival
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Time to First Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) for Tacrolimus
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Grade of Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection Episodes
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Minimum Concentration of Tacrolimus (Cmin)
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Primary Reason for Graft Loss
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Safety as Assessed by Adverse Events, Laboratory Parameters and Vital Signs
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Tacrolimus (Tmax)
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Patient Survival
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Tacrolimus
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Graft Survival
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants Receiving Anti-lymphocyte Antibody Therapy for Acute Rejection
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants Returning to Permanent Dialysis
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Treated Acute Rejection Episodes
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Multiple Rejection Episodes
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection
NCT00282568 (19) [back to overview]Time to Event for Graft Non Survival
NCT00284934 (4) [back to overview]Renal Function at 3 Months Assessed by Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
NCT00284934 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Failure Parameters (Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss, Death, or Loss to Follow-up) at 6 Months
NCT00284934 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Graft and Patient Survivals at 6 Months
NCT00284934 (4) [back to overview]Renal Function Assessed by Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate(eGFR)
NCT00296244 (6) [back to overview]Patient Survival Rate
NCT00296244 (6) [back to overview]Incidence and Severity of HCV Recurrence Post-OLT
NCT00296244 (6) [back to overview]Acute Rejection Rate
NCT00296244 (6) [back to overview]Graft Survival Rate
NCT00296244 (6) [back to overview]New-onset Diabetes Mellitus (NODM) as Secondary Outcome
NCT00296244 (6) [back to overview]Infection as an Adverse Effect of Steroids
NCT00296296 (4) [back to overview]Freedom From Insulin Therapy Post Transplant
NCT00296296 (4) [back to overview]Patient Survival at One Year Post Transplantation
NCT00296296 (4) [back to overview]Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) 1 Year Following Transplantation
NCT00296296 (4) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at One Year Post Transplantation
NCT00299221 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Allograft Vasculopathy (CAD) at One Year Post Transplant
NCT00299221 (5) [back to overview]Mean International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Biopsy Score Over the First 6 Months Post-transplantation
NCT00299221 (5) [back to overview]Mean ISHLT Biopsy Score Over First Year Post-transplant
NCT00299221 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) at One Year Post-transplant
NCT00299221 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Patients Alive at One Year Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Annual Change Rate in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (CIMT) From Pre-conversion Baseline at 12, 18, 24 and 36 Months Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant.
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Homocysteine at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Insulin at Months 12, 24, and 36 Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters at 12, 18, 24 and 36 Months Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]CIMT at Pre-conversion Baseline
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Fibrinogen at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Glucose at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-alpha) at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Uric Acid at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Vitamin B12 at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Used Anti-hypertensive Medications
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Used Lipid Lowering Therapies
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Adiponectin at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Annual Change Rate in Total Plaque Volume (TPV) From Pre-conversion Baseline to 12 Months Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin(HbA1C) at Months 12, 24, and 36 Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]TPV at Pre-conversion Baseline
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Endothelin-1 at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant
NCT00311311 (21) [back to overview]Annual Rate of Change in TPV From Pre-conversion Baseline to 18, 24 and 36 Months Post Transplant
NCT00322101 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00322101 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00322101 (6) [back to overview]Non-relapse Mortality
NCT00322101 (6) [back to overview]Donor Cell Engraftment
NCT00322101 (6) [back to overview]Incidence and Severity of Acute and Chronic Graft-vs-host Disease
NCT00322101 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Disease Progression/Relapse
NCT00332839 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events and Death
NCT00350545 (5) [back to overview]Participants Who Reduced Steroid Use at One Year After Enrollment on the Trial
NCT00350545 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Ability to Successfully Taper Prednisone to a Dose Lower Dose.
NCT00350545 (5) [back to overview]Failure-free Survival at 6 and 12 Months Post-Rituximab Initiation
NCT00350545 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00350545 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete and/or Partial GVHD Response
NCT00358657 (9) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade I/II Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
NCT00358657 (9) [back to overview]Incidence of Chronic GVHD
NCT00358657 (9) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Transplant Related Mortality
NCT00358657 (9) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who Achieve Greater Than 5% Donor T-cell Chimerism
NCT00358657 (9) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Infections
NCT00358657 (9) [back to overview]Graft Failure
NCT00358657 (9) [back to overview]Graft Rejection
NCT00358657 (9) [back to overview]Immune Reconstitution
NCT00358657 (9) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade III/IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
NCT00360685 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00360685 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Severe Mucositis
NCT00360685 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Acute Graft-vs-host Disease (aGVHD)
NCT00369161 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Incidence of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
NCT00369161 (3) [back to overview]Renal Function Assessed by Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR)
NCT00369161 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure
NCT00369226 (6) [back to overview]Sustained Engraftment Following Transplant.
NCT00369226 (6) [back to overview]The Maximally Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Bortezomib (Velcade) That Can be Administered With Tacrolimus and Methotrexate After Mismatched Allogeneic Non-myeloablative Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Transplantation
NCT00369226 (6) [back to overview]Successful Initial Engraftment by Day 45 Post Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Infusion and Administration of Bortezomib (Velcade), Tacrolimus and Methotrexate
NCT00369226 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival and Progression-free Survival.
NCT00369226 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) by Day 100.
NCT00369226 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (Chronic GVHD).
NCT00369382 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Acute Rejection
NCT00369382 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine Level at 4, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52 Weeks Post-randomization
NCT00369382 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Calculated Creatinine Clearance (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] Equation) at 4, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 Weeks Post-randomization
NCT00369382 (12) [back to overview]Serum Creatinine Level at Baseline
NCT00369382 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants Requiring Antibody Use in Treatment of Acute Rejection
NCT00369382 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Sirolimus Treatment Group Requiring Conversion Back to CNI Therapy
NCT00369382 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Calculated Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault Equation) at 52 Weeks Post-randomization
NCT00369382 (12) [back to overview]Calculated Creatinine Clearance (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] Equation) at Baseline
NCT00369382 (12) [back to overview]Calculated Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault Equation) at Baseline
NCT00369382 (12) [back to overview]Annual Change in Calculated Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault Equation)
NCT00369382 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Calculated Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault Equation) at 4, 16, 24, 32, and 40 Weeks Post-randomization
NCT00369382 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection by Severity
NCT00374231 (3) [back to overview]Time Post Transplant Corticosteroid Withdrawal
NCT00374231 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Biopsy Confirmed Acute Rejection at 12 Months.
NCT00374231 (3) [back to overview]Patient Survival.
NCT00378326 (2) [back to overview]Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Pleocytosis
NCT00378326 (2) [back to overview]Survival of Patients With Paraneoplastic Disease Who Are Treated With Tacrolimus
NCT00382109 (6) [back to overview]Estimated Percentage of Participants With Event Free Survival
NCT00382109 (6) [back to overview]Relative Contribution of ALL Blasts to the Donor Immune Response as a Cause of Relapse Post Transplantation (Correlating Development of aGVHD With Relapse)
NCT00382109 (6) [back to overview]Rate of Relapses
NCT00382109 (6) [back to overview]Estimated Transplant Related Mortality Percentage
NCT00382109 (6) [back to overview]Estimated Rate of Overall Chronic Graft VS Host Disease
NCT00382109 (6) [back to overview]Estimated Rate of Acute Graft VS Host Disease (GVHD)
NCT00385788 (1) [back to overview]Transplant Related Mortality Rate
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 for Eight Domain Scores of Quality of Life (QoL) Instrument SF-36 - All Randomized Participants
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Month 6 and to Month 12 in Serum Creatinine - All Randomized Participants
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria From Baseline up to Month 12 - Randomized and Treated Participants
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had Any Study Drug Dose Alteration by Month 12 Due to Any Reason - Randomized and Treated Participants
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Anti-Donor Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Positive Antibodies
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events (AEs) From First Dose up to Month 12
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Participants Who Switched From CNI to Belatacept in Long Term Period : Mean Change in Calculated GFR Based on Imputed Values From Day of Switch to Week 96 Post Switch
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Participants Who Switched to Belatacept in Long Term Period: Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft, Have Graft Loss or Death (Graft Loss, Death, Death With Functioning Graft) By Month 6 and Month 12 Post Randomization
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Ridit Score at Month 12 - All Randomized Participants
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) With Imputed Values to 12 Months Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants (Intent-to-Treat Population)
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Long Term Period: Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus Up to Month 36- All Randomized Participants Who Entered LT Period
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) by Months 6 and 12 Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) With Imputed Values to 6 Months Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants (Intent-to-Treat Population)
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Composite Endpoint of Death, Graft Loss and Acute Rejection at Month 12
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus - All Randomized Participants
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to 54 Months Post Randomization in Calculated GFR on Imputed Values at Specified Timepoints - Intent to Treat (ITT) Participants Who Entered LT Period
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Serum Creatinine- ITT Participants Who Entered LT Period
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Long Term Period: Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria - All ITT Participants Who Entered the Long Term Period
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Long Term Period: Number of Participants Who Survived With a Functioning Graft or Survived With Pure Graft Loss or Death With Functioning Graft - ITT Participants Who Entered the LT Period
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Long Term Period: Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) - All Randomized Participants in LT Period
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Long Term Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest - All Randomized Participants Who Entered the Long Term Period
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Long Term Period: Number of Participants With SAEs, Death, Discontinuation Due to AEs - All Randomized Participants Who Entered the Long Term Period
NCT00402168 (26) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in SF-36 Questionnaire Physical Component Score and in Mental Component Score at Month 12 - All Randomized Participants
NCT00406393 (10) [back to overview]Time to Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment
NCT00406393 (10) [back to overview]Rate of Grades II-IV Acute GVHD-free Survival
NCT00406393 (10) [back to overview]Rate of Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)
NCT00406393 (10) [back to overview]Incidence of Acute GVHD
NCT00406393 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00406393 (10) [back to overview]Reactivation of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection
NCT00406393 (10) [back to overview]Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) Infection
NCT00406393 (10) [back to overview]Malignant Disease Relapse
NCT00406393 (10) [back to overview]Treatment-related Mortality
NCT00406393 (10) [back to overview]Mucositis Severity
NCT00423514 (1) [back to overview]Participants Evaluated for Early Post-transplant Regimen-related Severe Morbidity (Grade III to IV Nonhematologic Toxicity) and Mortality as Measured by the NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program CTCAE v 3.0
NCT00429143 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Grades III-IV GVHD
NCT00429143 (5) [back to overview]Lymphoid Recovery
NCT00429143 (5) [back to overview]Optimal Dose of CD3+ Donor Lymphocytes (T-cells) for Consistent Engraftment Without GVHD
NCT00429143 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival of Participants
NCT00429143 (5) [back to overview]Engraftment Rates
NCT00429416 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host-Disease (GVHD)
NCT00429416 (5) [back to overview]Safety of CD34+ Stem Cell Infusions Followed by LLME as Measured by 100-Day Mortality
NCT00429416 (5) [back to overview]Rate of Serious Infectious Complications
NCT00429416 (5) [back to overview]Rate of Engraftment of Non-Myeloablative Transplants
NCT00429416 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Achieve a CD4 Count > 200/Micro-liters
NCT00439556 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT00439556 (2) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival
NCT00445744 (2) [back to overview]Non-relapse Mortality (NRM) (Patients With AML/MDS)
NCT00445744 (2) [back to overview]Effectiveness of Cyclophosphamide/Busulfan Regimen in Reducing Regimen-related Liver Toxicity
NCT00446264 (6) [back to overview]Plasma C-peptide
NCT00446264 (6) [back to overview]Composite Criteria: Insulin Independence and Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Under 6.5% at One Year
NCT00446264 (6) [back to overview]HbA1c < 6.5%
NCT00446264 (6) [back to overview]Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00446264 (6) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events
NCT00446264 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Time Spent in Hypoglycemia (<0.70 mg/L)
NCT00448201 (4) [back to overview]Graft-vs-host Disease at 6 Months Post-transplant
NCT00448201 (4) [back to overview]Complete or Mixed Donor Chimerism at 30, 60, and 90 Days Post-transplant
NCT00448201 (4) [back to overview]5-year Disease-free Survival
NCT00448201 (4) [back to overview]Treatment-related Mortality
NCT00448357 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of DNA Chimerism in Patients Between One Month Post Transplant
NCT00448357 (6) [back to overview]Three-year Relapse-free Survival (RFS) Rate at the Maximum Tolerated Dose Identified During Phase I of the Trial (Target AUC 6912)
NCT00448357 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Graft vs Host Disease in Patients Between One Month and Two Years Post Transplant
NCT00448357 (6) [back to overview]Capacity of Test Dosing of Busulfan That Would Result in the Desired Area Under the Curve Concentration Exposure of Patients Receiving a Full-dose Busulfan Regimen
NCT00448357 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT00448357 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Acute Rejection of Transplant up to End of Month 48 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population in Long Term Extension
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Were Both Calcineurin Inhibitor-free (CNI-free)and Corticosteroid-free at Months 24, 36, 48 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population in Long Term Extension
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Were Corticosteroid-free at Months 6 and 12 and Number of Participants Who Were Both Calcineurin Inhibitor-free (CNI-free)and Corticosteroid-free at Months 6 and 12 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Graft Loss or Death at Months 24, 36, 48 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population in Long Term Extension
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Graft Loss or Death up to Month 6 and Month 12 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline (BL) to Month 12 Post Transplantation in Lipid Values - Intent to Treat Population
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Acute Rejection of Transplant up to Month 12 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Composite of Death, Graft Loss and Acute Rejection up to Month 6 - Intent to Treat Population
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Switched Between MMF and Sirolimus During Long Term Extension up to Study Completion
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Composite of Death, Graft Loss and Acute Rejection up to Month 12 - Intent to Treat Population
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) of Transplant up to 6 Months Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants Using Antihyperlipidemic Medications at Month 12 - Intent to Treat Population
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Delayed Graft Function - Intent to Treat Population
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus From Baseline to Month 12 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Mean (Standard Deviation) in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) mL/Min/1.73m^2 at Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Mean (Standard Deviation) in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) mL/Min/1.73m^2 at Months 24, 36 and 48 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population in Long Term Extension
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Mean Systolic, Diastolic and Arterial Blood Pressure at Baseline and Month 12 - Intent to Treat Population
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Corticosteroid-free Participants at 6 and 12 Months Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Corticosteroid-free Participants at Months 24, 36, 48 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population in Long Term Extension
NCT00455013 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Used Anti-hypertension Medications at Baseline and at 12 Months Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population
NCT00496483 (11) [back to overview]Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics (Tmax) Was Measured at Day 21.
NCT00496483 (11) [back to overview]Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Trough Levels (C24).
NCT00496483 (11) [back to overview]Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC 0-24).
NCT00496483 (11) [back to overview]Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC 0-24).
NCT00496483 (11) [back to overview]Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Exposure Trough Levels (C24).
NCT00496483 (11) [back to overview]Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics (Fluctuation and Swing) Was Measured at Day 7.
NCT00496483 (11) [back to overview]Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics (Fluctuation and Swing) Was Measured at Day 21.
NCT00496483 (11) [back to overview]Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics (Cmax and Cavg) Was Measured at Day 7.
NCT00496483 (11) [back to overview]Safety Evaluation
NCT00496483 (11) [back to overview]Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics (Tmax) Was Measured at Day 7.
NCT00496483 (11) [back to overview]Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics (Cmax and Cavg) Was Measured at Day 21.
NCT00499889 (3) [back to overview]Participants' With mCR Response to Post Transplant Imatinib Mesylate Therapy
NCT00499889 (3) [back to overview]Participants' With mCR Response to Post Transplant DLI
NCT00499889 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Complete Molecular Remission at 1 Year
NCT00504348 (2) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00504348 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00506922 (1) [back to overview]Number of Patients Without GVHD at 100 Days
NCT00513474 (3) [back to overview]Uric Acid Levels
NCT00513474 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grades II to IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (aGVHD)
NCT00513474 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participant With Adverse Events (AE)
NCT00533442 (3) [back to overview]Overall Pancreas Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.
NCT00533442 (3) [back to overview]Event-Specific Survival Comparisons
NCT00533442 (3) [back to overview]Overall Kidney Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Graft Survival at Month 6 and Month 12
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale Scores Over Time
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Maximum Grade of T-cell Mediated Rejection as Assessed by Central Review
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection (BCAR) at Month 6 Assessed by Local Review
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure at Month 6 and 12
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With T-cell Mediated BCAR at Month 6 and 12 Assessed by Local Review
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With T-cell Mediated BCAR at Month 6 and 12 Assessed by Central Review
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Multiple Rejection Episodes at Months 6 and 12
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Change From Week 4 in Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimated by the MDRD Method at Month 6 and Month 12
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Change From Week 4 in GFR by Iothalamate Clearance at Month 6
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Time to First T-cell Mediated BCAR Assessed by Local Review
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure at 6 and 12 Months Assessed by Local Review
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With BCAR at Month 12 Assessed by Local Review
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Time to First BCAR Assessed by Central Review
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure at 6 and 12 Months Assessed by Central Review
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Clinically Treated Acute Rejection at Month 6 and Month 12
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Time to First T-cell Mediated BCAR Assessed by Central Review
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Time to First BCAR Assessed by Local Review
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Change From Week 4 in Serum Creatinine at Month 6 and 12
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index Score Over Time
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With BCAR at Month 6 and 12 Assessed by Central Review
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Anti-lymphocyte-treated Rejection at Months 6 and 12
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Patient Survival at Month 6 and Month 12
NCT00543569 (24) [back to overview]Maximum Grade of T-cell Mediated Rejection Assessed by Local Review
NCT00544115 (2) [back to overview]Neutrophil Engraftment - The Days Till ANC Recovery
NCT00544115 (2) [back to overview]Two-year Overall Survival
NCT00545402 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss
NCT00545402 (6) [back to overview]Graft Survival
NCT00545402 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) at Month 12 - Percentage of Participants With an Event
NCT00545402 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival at Month 12
NCT00545402 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) According to Banff Criteria up to 12 Months Post-Transplant
NCT00545402 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central Review
NCT00553202 (2) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of NK Cell Reconstitution
NCT00553202 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00555048 (7) [back to overview]Disease Relapse
NCT00555048 (7) [back to overview]Grades III-IV Acute Graft-vs-host Disease (GVHD)
NCT00555048 (7) [back to overview]Extensive Chronic GVHD
NCT00555048 (7) [back to overview]Life-threatening Infection
NCT00555048 (7) [back to overview]Graft Failure
NCT00555048 (7) [back to overview]Lowest Dose of Alemtuzumab Associated With Transplant-related Mortality
NCT00555048 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated GFR, by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated GFR During the LTE
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) Values: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Belatacept Trough Concentration Before Each Infusion During the LTE
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Episode of Acute Rejection, Graft Loss, or Death by End of Study (Includes LTE Data)
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Episode of Acute Rejection (AR), Graft Loss, or Death by 6 Months Post-transplant
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Surviving With Functional Graft by End of Study (Includes LTE Data)
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Belatacept PK Parameter: Volume of Distribution
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Belatacept PK Parameter: Total Body Clearance
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Belatacept PK Parameter: Terminal Half-life
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Belatacept PK Parameter: Minimum Plasma Concentration
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Belatacept PK Parameter: Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve to the End of the Dosing Period (AUCtau)
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Belatacept PK Parameter: Amount Excreted in Ascites Fluid Over Days 1 to 14
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Belatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Time to Achieve the Maximum Plasma Concentration
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Belatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Maximum Serum Concentration
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Episode of Acute Rejection, Graft Loss, or Death by 12 Months
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Summary Statistics for Systolic Blood Pressure: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Summary Statistics for Mean Arterial Pressure: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Summary Statistics for Lipid Parameters; Serum HDL Cholesterol: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Summary Statistics for Lipid Parameters-Serum Total Non-High Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Summary Statistics for Lipid Parameters- Serum Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL): 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Summary Statistics for Lipid Parameters- Serum Cholesterol: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Summary Statistics for Lipid Parameters - Serum Triglyceride: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Summary Statistics for Diastolic Blood Pressure: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus (NODM): 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Have Hypertension at Any Given Time During the 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Developed Hypertension in 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Develop Dyslipidemia, Hypertriglyceridemia and Hypercholesterolemia After Randomization and Transplantation: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Surviving With Functional Graft: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Meeting the Definition of Dyslipidemia, Hypertriglyceridemia or Hypercholesterolemia at Any Given Time: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants (Who Were Hepatitis C Virus [HCV] Positive at Baseline) With HCV Recurrence (Assessed by Central Pathologist) During the LTE
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants (Who Were Hepatitis C Virus [HCV] Positive at Baseline) With HCV Recurrence (Assessed by Central Pathologist) by 12 Months
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Abnormalities: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Abnormalities During the LTE
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Abnormalities: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Abnormalities During the LTE
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Marked Electrolytes, Protein and Metabolic Test Abnormalities: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Marked Electrolytes, Protein and Metabolic Test Abnormalities During the LTE
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Central Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection by Treatment Type During the LTE
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Central Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection by Treatment Type by 12 Months
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Acute Rejections by Rejection Activity Index (RAI) by 12 Months
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Received Anti-hypertensive Therapy at Month 12
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had AEs, Death, SAEs or Were Discontinued Due to AEs: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had AEs of Special Interest During the LTE
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had Adverse Events of Special Interest During 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AEs), Death, Serious AEs (SAEs) or Were Discontinued Due to AEs (Includes Long Term Extension [LTE] Data)
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had Acute Rejection by Banff Grade by 12 Months
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants Having Acute Rejections: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants Having Acute Rejections During the LTE
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants Having Acute Rejection by Rejection Activity Index During the LTE
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants at Risk of First Acute Rejection as Determined by Kaplan-Meier Method by 12 Months
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants (Who Were HCV Positive at Baseline) With HCV RNA Levels >2.4 * 10^6 U/mL and >4.7 * 10^6 U/mL During the LTE
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Number of Participants (Who Were HCV Positive at Baseline) With HCV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels >2.4*10^6 U/mL and >4.7*10^6 U/mL: 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Mean Change in Baseline Values of Cystatin C at 2 and 12 Months
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline Serum Creatinine at Months 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12
NCT00555321 (56) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR): 12-month Treatment Phase
NCT00556933 (12) [back to overview]New-onset Polyomavirus (BK Virus) Disease Per Kidney Biopsy
NCT00556933 (12) [back to overview]Patient Survival
NCT00556933 (12) [back to overview]Ratio of CD4/CD8 Lymphoid Cells
NCT00556933 (12) [back to overview]Requirement for Additional Immunosuppression (Such as Corticosteroids, Antimetabolites or Other Immunosuppressive Agents)
NCT00556933 (12) [back to overview]Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (Cumulative Calcineurin-inhibitor Nephrotoxicity/Transplant Nephropathy) Per Protocol Surveillance Kidney Biopsies (Banff Grading Criteria).
NCT00556933 (12) [back to overview]Safety Profile
NCT00556933 (12) [back to overview]Lymphoid Cell Sub-type CD3 Absolute Numbers
NCT00556933 (12) [back to overview]Average of Renal Function
NCT00556933 (12) [back to overview]New-onset Diabetes and Hyperglycemia After Transplantation (NODAT)
NCT00556933 (12) [back to overview]Graft Survival
NCT00556933 (12) [back to overview]Acute Tubular Necrosis (ATN) Rate, Defined as the Requirement for Dialysis Within 7 Days Post-transplantation.
NCT00556933 (12) [back to overview]Acute Rejection Per Kidney Biopsy (Banff Grading Criteria)
NCT00577278 (3) [back to overview]Relapse/Progression Rate at Two Years
NCT00577278 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival at Two Years
NCT00577278 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival at Two Years
NCT00578903 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Alive at 1 Year Post Transplant
NCT00578903 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Chronic GVHD at 2 Years Post Transplant
NCT00578903 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Acute GVHD at 100 Days Post Transplant
NCT00578903 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Alive at 2 Years Post Transplant
NCT00578903 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Alive at 100 Days Post Transplant
NCT00578903 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Engraftment Rate at 100 Days Post Transplant
NCT00579111 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Successful Donor Engraftment
NCT00579111 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Treatment Related Grade III or IV Non-hematological Toxicity
NCT00579527 (8) [back to overview]Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Total CD8 T Cells
NCT00579527 (8) [back to overview]Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Total CD4 T Cells
NCT00579527 (8) [back to overview]Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Total CD3 T Cells
NCT00579527 (8) [back to overview]Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Response to Mitogens
NCT00579527 (8) [back to overview]Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Naive CD8 T Cells
NCT00579527 (8) [back to overview]Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Naive CD4 T Cells
NCT00579527 (8) [back to overview]Survival at 1 Year Post-CTTI
NCT00579527 (8) [back to overview]Survival at 2 Years Post-CTTI
NCT00589316 (1) [back to overview]Two-Year Disease-free Survival of Study Participants Who Completed the Study Regimen
NCT00589563 (14) [back to overview]Severity of Chronic GVHD
NCT00589563 (14) [back to overview]Severity of Acute GVHD
NCT00589563 (14) [back to overview]Time to Platelet Count Recovery (Engraftment)
NCT00589563 (14) [back to overview]Time to Absolute Neutrophil Count Recovery (Engraftment)
NCT00589563 (14) [back to overview]Overall Survival at Two Years Post HSCT
NCT00589563 (14) [back to overview]Occurrence of Thrombotic Microangiopathy
NCT00589563 (14) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) at Day 100
NCT00589563 (14) [back to overview]Event Free Survival at Two Years Post HSCT
NCT00589563 (14) [back to overview]Incidence of Disease Relapse/Progression at 2 Years Post HSCT
NCT00589563 (14) [back to overview]Non-relapse Mortality at 100 Days Post HSCT
NCT00589563 (14) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD
NCT00589563 (14) [back to overview]Non-relapse Mortality at Two Years Post HSCT
NCT00589563 (14) [back to overview]Occurence of Infections Including Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation
NCT00589563 (14) [back to overview]Occurence of Sinusoidal Obstructive Syndrome (SOS)
NCT00608244 (5) [back to overview]Safety Evaluation
NCT00608244 (5) [back to overview]Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Trough Levels (C24).
NCT00608244 (5) [back to overview]Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Exposure Trough Levels (C24).
NCT00608244 (5) [back to overview]Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC 0-24).
NCT00608244 (5) [back to overview]Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC 0-24) on Day 21.
NCT00608894 (3) [back to overview]Biochemical Remission by Month 3.
NCT00608894 (3) [back to overview]Biochemical Remission of (AIH) at Month 6.
NCT00608894 (3) [back to overview]Incomplete Response, Treatment Failure, or a Case of Relapse at 6 Months
NCT00611351 (4) [back to overview]Transplantation-related Mortality at 100 Days Post-transplantation
NCT00611351 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00611351 (4) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT00611351 (4) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute Graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD)
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]GFR Measured by Iothalamate Clearance at Month 6
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Graft Survival
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Patient Survival
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Acute Rejection Diagnosed by Signs and Symptoms at Month 6
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Anti-Lymphocyte Antibody Therapy for Treatment of Rejection at Month 6
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Acute Rejection (T-Cell Mediated or Antibody Mediated) at Month 6
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Antibody-Mediated Acute Rejection at Month 6
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-Confirmed Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection as Assessed by Central Review at Month 6
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection at Month 6 Assessed by Local Review
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Clinically Treated Acute Rejection at Month 6
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Delayed Graft Function
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure at Month 6
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Steroid-resistant Acute Rejection at Month 6
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Acute Mixed T-Cell Mediated and Antibody-Mediated Rejection at Month 6
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Change From Month 1 in Creatinine Clearance
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Change From Month 1 in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure at Month 6
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Change From Month 1 in Serum Creatinine
NCT00617604 (20) [back to overview]Maximum Histological Grade of All Biopsies After Local Review
NCT00622869 (4) [back to overview]Incidence Rate of Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR) at Months 12 and 24
NCT00622869 (4) [back to overview]Change in Renal Function From Randomization to Months 12 and 24
NCT00622869 (4) [back to overview]Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure From Randomization to Month 12
NCT00622869 (4) [back to overview]Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure From Randomization to Month 24
NCT00622895 (10) [back to overview]Treatment-related Mortality
NCT00622895 (10) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT00622895 (10) [back to overview]EFS
NCT00622895 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life as Assessed by the Modified Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ)
NCT00622895 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life as Assessed by the Medical Outcome Short Form (36) Health Survey Instrument (SF-36)
NCT00622895 (10) [back to overview]Incidence and Severity of Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)
NCT00622895 (10) [back to overview]Skin Score
NCT00622895 (10) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants With Definite and Probable Viral, Fungal, and Bacterial Infections
NCT00622895 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00622895 (10) [back to overview]Incidence of Graft Rejection
NCT00623012 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00623012 (3) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival
NCT00623012 (3) [back to overview]Improvement of the Rate of Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) From the Accepted Rate of 74%.
NCT00629122 (5) [back to overview]Tacrolimus Powder Dissolution Time
NCT00629122 (5) [back to overview]Cmax
NCT00629122 (5) [back to overview]C0 (ng/mL)
NCT00629122 (5) [back to overview]Tmax
NCT00629122 (5) [back to overview]Estimated AUC 0-6
NCT00639717 (3) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients That Experienced Graft Versus Host Disease
NCT00639717 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Relapse by 6 Months
NCT00639717 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Alive at 6 Months
NCT00654355 (3) [back to overview]The % Change From Baseline to Week 4 (or End of Treatment) in the IGA.
NCT00654355 (3) [back to overview]EASI
NCT00654355 (3) [back to overview]Adherence
NCT00679042 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Presenting With Insulin Independence at Day 365 Post First and Last Transplant
NCT00679042 (5) [back to overview]Hypoglycemic Episodes by HYPO Score
NCT00679042 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Reaching the Efficacy Goal
NCT00679042 (5) [back to overview]Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT00679042 (5) [back to overview]Reduction in Hypoglycemic Severity Measured by %Reduction in HYPO Score
NCT00686855 (1) [back to overview]The Clinical Efficacy of Topical Steroid and Topical Tacrolimus Therapies for the Treatment of Oral cGHVD.
NCT00707759 (1) [back to overview]Stimulation of Growth After 12 Months (Delta Z-score)
NCT00709592 (9) [back to overview]Relapse
NCT00709592 (9) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT00709592 (9) [back to overview]The Comparison of Functional Immune Reconstitution at 6-9 Months Following Transplant as Measured by Antibody Response to Vaccination With Inactivated Hepatitis A or B Vaccine.
NCT00709592 (9) [back to overview]Treatment Related Mortality
NCT00709592 (9) [back to overview]Engraftment of Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cells, as Measured by Time in Days to Neutrophil and Platelet Count Recovery Following Allogeneic PBSCT.
NCT00709592 (9) [back to overview]Donor Lymphocyte Infusion
NCT00709592 (9) [back to overview]Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD)
NCT00709592 (9) [back to overview]Survival
NCT00709592 (9) [back to overview]Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD)
NCT00720629 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Rituximab Response to Reactivated EBV Without PTLD
NCT00720629 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Reactivation
NCT00720629 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Score at 100 Days
NCT00720629 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00720629 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamics of Visilizumab - Test 2
NCT00720629 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamics of Visilizumab - Test 1
NCT00731874 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Opportunistic Infection
NCT00731874 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection and/or Progression of Histologically Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy at 15 Months After Transplantation.
NCT00731874 (7) [back to overview]Patient Survival
NCT00731874 (7) [back to overview]Development of Donor Specific Antibody (DSA)
NCT00731874 (7) [back to overview]Development of New Onset Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00731874 (7) [back to overview]Graft Survival
NCT00731874 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Acute Rejection
NCT00758602 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure at 12 Months Post-Transplant
NCT00758602 (9) [back to overview]Participant and Graft Survival
NCT00758602 (9) [back to overview]Time to First Acute Rejection Post-Transplant
NCT00758602 (9) [back to overview]Chronic Allograft Damage Index (CADI) Score at Month 12 After Transplantation
NCT00758602 (9) [back to overview]Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 12 After Transplantation
NCT00758602 (9) [back to overview]Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) (mL/Min)
NCT00758602 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Acute Rejection, Graft Loss, or Death at 6 and 12 Months Post-Transplant
NCT00758602 (9) [back to overview]Time to First Acute Rejection Post-Transplant - Number of Participants With an Event
NCT00758602 (9) [back to overview]Serum Creatinine (Micromoles Per Liter [µmol/L])
NCT00765661 (4) [back to overview]Comparative Pharmacokinetics Between LCP-Tacro and Prograf Within 14 Days After Kidney Transplantation.
NCT00765661 (4) [back to overview]Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf in Adult de Novo Kidney Transplant Patients.
NCT00765661 (4) [back to overview]Comparative Pharmacokinetics Between LCP-Tacro and Prograf Within 14 Days After Kidney Transplantation.
NCT00765661 (4) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics of LCP-Tacro™ Tablets in the First 14 Days After Transplantation in Adult de Novo Kidney Recipients.
NCT00772148 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients in Each Treatment Group Achieving Sufficient Tacrolimus Whole Blood Trough Levels (5 to 20 ng/mL) During the First 14 Days Post-transplantation.
NCT00772148 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (AUC0-24) of LCP-Tacro™ Compared to Prograf Early After Transplantations (Within the First 14 Days) in Adult de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients.
NCT00772148 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (Cmax and Cmin) of LCP-Tacro™ Compared to Prograf Early After Transplantations (Within the First 14 Days) in Adult de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients.
NCT00772148 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients in Each Treatment Group Achieving Sufficient Tacrolimus Whole Blood Trough Levels (5 to 20 ng/mL) During the First 14 Days Post-transplantation.
NCT00772148 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients in Each Treatment Group Achieving Sufficient Tacrolimus Whole Blood Trough Levels (5 to 20 ng/mL) During the First 14 Days Post-transplantation.
NCT00772148 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Died Within the 360 Days.
NCT00782379 (11) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival at 12 Months
NCT00782379 (11) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival at Day 100
NCT00782379 (11) [back to overview]Incidence of Graft Rejection for Patients at Day 100
NCT00782379 (11) [back to overview]Achievement of >90% (Full) Donor Chimerism in the T-Cell Lineage as Measured by PCR at Day 30 Post-transplantation
NCT00782379 (11) [back to overview]Achievement of >90% (Full) Donor Chimerism in the T-Cell Lineage as Measured by PCR at Day 60 Post-transplantation
NCT00782379 (11) [back to overview]Achievement of >90% (Full) Donor Chimerism in the T-Cell Lineage as Measured by PCR at Day 90 Post-transplantation
NCT00782379 (11) [back to overview]Non-relapse Mortality at 1 Year After Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (PBSCT)
NCT00782379 (11) [back to overview]Non-relapse Mortality at Day 100 After Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (PBSCT)
NCT00782379 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experienced Severe Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)(Grade 3 or 4)
NCT00782379 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 12 Months
NCT00782379 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival at Day 100
NCT00787761 (8) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) at 24 Months
NCT00787761 (8) [back to overview]Non-relapse Mortality (NRM) at Day 180 Post-transplantation
NCT00787761 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing Extensive Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
NCT00787761 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experience Severe (Grade 3 or 4) Acute Graft-versus-host Disease
NCT00787761 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) at 24 Months
NCT00787761 (8) [back to overview]Achievement of > 90% (Full) Donor Chimerism in the T-cell Lineage as Measured by PCR at Day 30 Post-transplantation
NCT00787761 (8) [back to overview]T-cell and Myeloid Chimerism at Days 180 Post-transplantation (>90%)
NCT00787761 (8) [back to overview]T-cell and Myeloid Chimerism at Days 90 Post-transplantation (>90% Chimerism)
NCT00789776 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Chronic Extensive GVHD
NCT00789776 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Graft Failure
NCT00789776 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities
NCT00789776 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grades III-IV Acute GVHD
NCT00789776 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Relapsed Disease
NCT00789776 (7) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Surviving Post-transplant.
NCT00789776 (7) [back to overview]Number of Non-relapse Participant Mortalities
NCT00792948 (3) [back to overview]Continuous Complete Remission (CCR) Rate
NCT00792948 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00792948 (3) [back to overview]Relapse-free Survival (RFS) After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
NCT00801632 (8) [back to overview]Change in Renal Function
NCT00801632 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Significant Invasive or Resistant Opportunistic Infection
NCT00801632 (8) [back to overview]Time to Neutrophil Recovery Following Transplant
NCT00801632 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Successfully Withdrawn Off of Immunosuppressant Medication for 104 Weeks
NCT00801632 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Graft Survival Through 156 Weeks
NCT00801632 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Surviving Through 156 Weeks
NCT00801632 (8) [back to overview]Time to Platelet Recovery Following Transplant
NCT00801632 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Acute Rejection
NCT00803010 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Increased Absolute Numbers of Regulatory T Cells (Treg)
NCT00803010 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Evidence of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (aGVHD), Post Transplant
NCT00803010 (3) [back to overview]2 Year Post Transplant Overall Survival (OS) Rate
NCT00807144 (2) [back to overview]Rejection-free Patient Survival With a Functioning Graft
NCT00807144 (2) [back to overview]Patient Survival With a Functioning Graft
NCT00810602 (4) [back to overview]Number of Serious Adverse Events
NCT00810602 (4) [back to overview]Percent Cumulative Incidence of Relapse at 2 Years.
NCT00810602 (4) [back to overview]100-day Cumulative Incidence of Grade 2-4 Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
NCT00810602 (4) [back to overview]Percent Survival at 2-years
NCT00817206 (1) [back to overview]Composite Endpoint for Efficacy Failure Within 12 Months of Randomization: Death, Graft Failure, Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection or Loss to Follow-up.
NCT00818961 (11) [back to overview]Non-relapse Mortality at Day 100
NCT00818961 (11) [back to overview]Survival at Day 100
NCT00818961 (11) [back to overview]Platelet Engraftment
NCT00818961 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 1 Year
NCT00818961 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients Requiring the Use of Donor Leukocyte Infusion (DLI) for Early Mixed T-cell Chimerism
NCT00818961 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD) Post-transplant
NCT00818961 (11) [back to overview]Complete Donor Chimerism
NCT00818961 (11) [back to overview]Neutrophil Recovery
NCT00818961 (11) [back to overview]Non-relapse Mortality at 1 Year Post-transplant
NCT00818961 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 2-4 Acute Graft-versus-host Disease Post-transplant
NCT00818961 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
NCT00821587 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Less Than 100 Hepatitis C Virus RNA Copies/mL
NCT00827099 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients That Engrafted Blood Counts by 30 Days After Transplant
NCT00827099 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With 100 Day Transplant-related Mortality (TRM)
NCT00843856 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patient Who Gained Remission From the Nephrotic Syndrome
NCT00843856 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients Achieved Remission
NCT00857389 (7) [back to overview]Engraftment
NCT00857389 (7) [back to overview]Graft vs Host Disease (GVHD)
NCT00857389 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Disease Free Survival
NCT00857389 (7) [back to overview]Relapse Rate of Participants Treated With Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Clofarabine
NCT00857389 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate
NCT00857389 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Survival Rate at 100 Days Post-transplant
NCT00857389 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events
NCT00860574 (8) [back to overview]Incidence of Chronic GVHD
NCT00860574 (8) [back to overview]Non Relapse Mortality Incidence
NCT00860574 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00860574 (8) [back to overview]Relapse Incidence
NCT00860574 (8) [back to overview]Relapse-free Survival
NCT00860574 (8) [back to overview]Incidence of Grades II-IV Acute GVHD
NCT00860574 (8) [back to overview]Non Relapse Mortality (NRM) Incidence
NCT00860574 (8) [back to overview]Median Donor CD3 + T Lymphocyte Chimerism in Peripheral Blood
NCT00862979 (6) [back to overview]Occurrence of Treatment Failures From Month 6 to 9 and Month 9 to 18
NCT00862979 (6) [back to overview]Occurrence of Major Cardiac Events (MACE) From Month 6 to 18
NCT00862979 (6) [back to overview]Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) According to Cockcroft-Gault at Month 12 and 18
NCT00862979 (6) [back to overview]Reciprocal Creatinine Slope Between Month 6 and Month 18
NCT00862979 (6) [back to overview]Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) Using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Formula at Month 18
NCT00862979 (6) [back to overview]Serum Creatinine at Month 6, 8, 9, 10 12 and 18
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement of ≥5 mL/Min/m^2 in Calculated GFR at 12 and 24 Months Post-Transplantation (Intent-to-Treat [ITT] Analysis)
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement of ≥7.5 mL/Min/m^2 in Calculated GFR at 12 and 24 Months Post-Transplantation
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With New-Onset Diabetes
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With New-Onset Diabetes Receiving Treatment for Diabetes (Insulin and Non-Insulin)
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Serum Creatinine (On-Therapy Analysis)
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Spot and 24 Hour Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPr/Cr)
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in Body Mass Index (BMI; in Kilograms Per Square Meter [kg/m^2])
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in Fasting Glucose (mmol/L)
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in Fasting Insulin (Picomoles Per Liter [Pmol/L])
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in Hemoglobin A1C (Liter Per Liter [L/L])
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in HOMA-Beta Cell (HOMA-B; Fasting)
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR; Fasting)
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in Waist Circumference(Centimeters [cm])
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in Weight (Kilograms [kg])
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-Confirmed Acute Rejection (BCAR), Graft Loss, or Death From Randomization to 24 Months Post-Transplantation
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement of ≥5 mL/Min/m^2 in Calculated GFR at 12 Months Post-Transplantation (On-Therapy Analysis)
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement of Greater Than or Equal to [≥]5 Milliliters Per Minute Per 1.73 Square Meters (mL/Min/m^2) in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 24 Months Post-Transplantation (On-Therapy Analysis)
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Infection
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Malignancy
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Polyomavirus Infection
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Stomatitis
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Slope of Calculated GFR (MDRD) From Randomization to 24 Months Post-Transplantation (On-Therapy Analysis)
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Calculated GFR Using MDRD (On-Therapy Analysis)
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Pre-Randomization) to 12 and 24 Months Post-Transplantation in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L])
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Change From Randomization in Calculated GFR Using MDRD (On-Therapy Analysis)
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Change From Randomization in Serum Creatinine (On-Therapy Analysis)
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Number of Participants With BCAR by Severity of First BCAR and Time of Onset From Post-Randomization to 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post-Transplant
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring Anti-Hypertensive Medication, Diabetes Agents, Lipid-Lowering Agents, or Erythropoiesis Stimuating Agents (ESAs)
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring Treatment for Stomatitis by Treatment Type
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Anemia, Thrombocytopenia, or Leukopenia
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI) or Angiotensin II Receptor Block (ARB) Use
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Antibody Use in Treatment of Acute Rejection
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With BCAR Post-Randomization to 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post-Transplantation
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With First On-Therapy BCAR From Transplantation Occurring at 12 and 24 Months
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss (Including Death) at 12 and 24 Months Post-Randomization
NCT00895583 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement of ≥10 mL/Min/m^2 in Calculated GFR at 12 and 24 Months Post-Transplantation
NCT00896012 (3) [back to overview]Either Equivalent or Improved Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at One Year in the Rapamycin Group
NCT00896012 (3) [back to overview]Improved Histology at 12 Months in the Rapamycin Group
NCT00896012 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Graft Survival at 12 Months
NCT00905515 (3) [back to overview]Renal Function in Patients Converted From Cyclosporine to Prograf
NCT00905515 (3) [back to overview]Optimal Dose of Calcineurin Inhibitor in Long-term Maintenance Kidney Transplant Patients
NCT00905515 (3) [back to overview]Change in Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Morbidity and Chronic Graft Dysfunction as Evidenced by Blood Levels of Homocysteine
NCT00914940 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Chronic GVHD
NCT00914940 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Did Not Engraft After Receiving a CD45RA+ T Cell Depleted PBSC Transplant
NCT00914940 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Have Relapsed Within 5 Years of CD45RA+ T Cell Depleted PBSC Transplant
NCT00914940 (4) [back to overview]Transplant-related Mortality by Day 100
NCT00919503 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Infections
NCT00919503 (10) [back to overview]Donor Chimerism CD33 at Day 100 Post Transplant
NCT00919503 (10) [back to overview]Donor Chimerism CD3 at 100 Days Post Transplant
NCT00919503 (10) [back to overview]Preliminary Efficacy
NCT00919503 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00919503 (10) [back to overview]Number of Patients With of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
NCT00919503 (10) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade II-IV Acute Graft-versus-host Disease
NCT00919503 (10) [back to overview]Non-relapse Mortality
NCT00919503 (10) [back to overview]Immune Reconstitution Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
NCT00919503 (10) [back to overview]Disease Response at One Year Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
NCT00928018 (6) [back to overview]To Compare 2-year Overall Survival of Patients With Lymphoma Undergoing RIC SCT Between Those Receiving Tacrolimus/Sirolimus/Methotrexate and Those Receiving Tacrolimus/Methotrexate or Cyclosporine/Mycophenolate Mofetil
NCT00928018 (6) [back to overview]To Compare the 2-year Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD Between the Two Treatment Arms.
NCT00928018 (6) [back to overview]To Compare the 180-day Cumulative Incidence of Grades II-IV and Grades III-IV Acute GVHD Between the Two Treatment Arms
NCT00928018 (6) [back to overview]To Compare the 2-year of Overall Survival, Progression-free Survival, Cumulative Incidences of Progression and Non-relapse Mortality Between the Treatment Arms for Each Histology Studied.
NCT00928018 (6) [back to overview]To Compare the 2-year Cumulative Incidences of Disease Progression and of Non-relapse Mortality Between the Two Treatment Arms
NCT00928018 (6) [back to overview]To Compare 2-year Progression-free Survival Between the Two Treatment Arms
NCT00931255 (9) [back to overview]The Composite Endpoint of Reduction of e eGFR at One Year by More Than 15% & the Progression in Fibrosis Score at One Year by >=20% Compared With the Baseline Values
NCT00931255 (9) [back to overview]Incidence of BK Nephropathy (Cumulative)
NCT00931255 (9) [back to overview]Graft Survival (Actual, Actuarial)
NCT00931255 (9) [back to overview]eGFR
NCT00931255 (9) [back to overview]Change in Inflammatory Marker, MCP, From Baseline
NCT00931255 (9) [back to overview]Change in Inflammatory Marker, IL-6 From Baseline
NCT00931255 (9) [back to overview]Change in eGFR From Baseline to 1-year
NCT00931255 (9) [back to overview]Incidence of Acute Rejection (Actual, Actuarial)
NCT00931255 (9) [back to overview]Change in Inflammatory Marker : CRP From Baseline
NCT00938860 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants of True Non-responder Rate
NCT00938860 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Fibrosis Progression (Increase in Ishak-Knodell (IK) Score by at Least One Point From the Baseline)
NCT00938860 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Sustained Virological Response (SVR) Following Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection With Peg-IFN and Ribavirin in Liver Transplanted Recipients on Maintenance Therapy With Neoral or Tacrolimus
NCT00938860 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Reduction or Discontinuation of Antiviral (AV) Therapy Due to Poor Tolerability at Any Time During the Study for Any Reason
NCT00938860 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants for Relapse Rate
NCT00938860 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants for the End of Treatment Response (ETR)
NCT00938860 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants of Early Viral Response (EVR)
NCT00938860 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants of Rapid Viral Response (RVR)
NCT00938860 (9) [back to overview]Number of Events of the Composite Endpoint of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejections (BPAR), Death or Graft Loss and of the Individual Components
NCT00946023 (12) [back to overview]Incidence of Chronic GVHD
NCT00946023 (12) [back to overview]Incidence of Grades III-IV Acute GVHD
NCT00946023 (12) [back to overview]Non-relapse Mortality
NCT00946023 (12) [back to overview]Engraftment
NCT00946023 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00946023 (12) [back to overview]Relapse
NCT00946023 (12) [back to overview]Relapse
NCT00946023 (12) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00946023 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00946023 (12) [back to overview]Graft Failure
NCT00946023 (12) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00946023 (12) [back to overview]Incidence of Grades II-IV Acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease (GVHD)
NCT00965094 (5) [back to overview]Participants Who Had Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection, Graft Loss or Death.
NCT00965094 (5) [back to overview]Renal Function Assessed as Glomerula Filtration Rate (GFR) - Nankivell Method - 9 Months After Renal Transplantation (LOCF)
NCT00965094 (5) [back to overview]Change in Renal Function (Creatinine Slope)
NCT00965094 (5) [back to overview]Participants Who Had Occurrence of Treatment Failure.
NCT00965094 (5) [back to overview]Assessment of GFR by the Cockcroft-Gault Method (LOCF)
NCT00970073 (4) [back to overview]Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at 12 Months Post-surgery
NCT00970073 (4) [back to overview]Allograft Rejection Rates at 30 Days
NCT00970073 (4) [back to overview]Patient Survival
NCT00970073 (4) [back to overview]Graft Survival
NCT00982072 (4) [back to overview]Number of Serious Adverse Events
NCT00982072 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Remission From Nephrotic Syndrome at 8 Weeks
NCT00982072 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving Remission Who Then Relapse
NCT00982072 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving Complete Remission From Nephrotic Syndrome at 16 and 26 Weeks
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]Lipidic Profile (HDL-c)
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Using Statins
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]Lipidic Profile (Cholesterol)
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]Changes of Carotid Intima-media Thickness Over Time
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]Number of Antihypertensive Drugs Patients Reported Taking.
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]Lipidic Profile (Triglycerides)
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Using Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA)
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]Rejection
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]Patients Treated With Insulin or Oral Antidiabetic Drugs
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]Lipidic Profile (LDL-c)
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]"Primary Outcome Measure New Onset Diabetes After Renal Transplantation (NODAT)"
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]Renal Function
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]Primary Outcome Measure (Glucose Intolerance)
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]Proteinuria
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]Blood Pressure
NCT01002339 (16) [back to overview]Blood Pressure
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With the Presence of Anti-MICA Antibodies by Luminex TM Assay
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants- Mortality While on Transplantation Wait-List
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Presence of C4d on Endomyocardial Biopsy (EMB)
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Time From Participant Listing on Organ Wait-List to Receiving Organ Transplant, Death or De-Listing
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Time to Acute Rejection
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants -Overall Participant and Graft Survival
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Acute Rejection
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With the Presence of Anti-HLA IgG Antibodies by Luminex SA Testing
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Positive for de Novo Donor-Specific Alloantibody Production in the First Year Post-Transplantation
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Positive for Event of Death, Graft Loss or Rejection With Hemodynamic Compromise at 12 Months Post-Transplantation
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Positive for Severe Infection(s)
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Time to Production of Post-Transplant de Novo Donor-specific Alloantibodies
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Occurrence of Re-Hospitalization(s)
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants -Quantification of Anti-HLA IgG Antibodies by Luminex SA Testing
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Time to Diagnosis of Chronic Rejection
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Time to New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus
NCT01005316 (17) [back to overview]Time to Post-Transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorder
NCT01005706 (1) [back to overview]Effectiveness and Safety of a Particular Drug Regimen to Prevent Kidney Rejection
NCT01008462 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade II-IV Acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease and/or Chronic Extensive Graft-versus-Host-Disease
NCT01008462 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01008462 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Relapsed/Progressive Disease
NCT01008462 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Had Infections
NCT01008462 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Engrafted
NCT01008462 (7) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS)
NCT01008462 (7) [back to overview]Non-relapse Mortality (NRM)
NCT01010217 (6) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival
NCT01010217 (6) [back to overview]Engraftments
NCT01010217 (6) [back to overview]Grade III-IV aGVHD
NCT01010217 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Non Related Mortality (NRM)
NCT01010217 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Non-relapse Mortality (NRM)
NCT01010217 (6) [back to overview]cGVHD
NCT01025817 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Incidence of Composite Efficacy Failure
NCT01025817 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Incidence of CMV (Viremia, Syndrome and Disease)
NCT01025817 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Incidence of Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Tacrolimus-associated Adverse Events
NCT01025817 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Incidence Rates of BKV Viremia, BKV Viruria, or BKV Nephropathy
NCT01025817 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Incidence of Proteinuria Events
NCT01025817 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Incidence of New Onset of Diabetes Mellitus
NCT01025817 (7) [back to overview]Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
NCT01027000 (1) [back to overview]2-year Progression-free Survival in Early Disease Participants
NCT01028716 (12) [back to overview]Number of Platelet Transfusions
NCT01028716 (12) [back to overview]Point Estimate of Overall Survival at 3 Years
NCT01028716 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
NCT01028716 (12) [back to overview]Non-relapse Mortality at 1 Year
NCT01028716 (12) [back to overview]Toxicity of Treatment Regimen Determined by Number of Adverse Events Per Organ System
NCT01028716 (12) [back to overview]Time to Platelet Recovery
NCT01028716 (12) [back to overview]Time to Neutrophil Recovery
NCT01028716 (12) [back to overview]Relapse of Malignancy After Transplantation
NCT01028716 (12) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival
NCT01028716 (12) [back to overview]Number of Red Blood Cell Transfusions
NCT01028716 (12) [back to overview]Incidence of Grades III/IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease
NCT01028716 (12) [back to overview]Incidence of Primary Graft Failure
NCT01044745 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01044745 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grades II-IV Acute GVHD
NCT01044745 (4) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT01044745 (4) [back to overview]Transplant-related Mortality (TRM)
NCT01053247 (1) [back to overview]Incidence of Success Based on the Investigator's Global Evaluation at the End of Treatment
NCT01062555 (6) [back to overview]Phase II: The Minimization of Negative Side Effects - Patient Survival
NCT01062555 (6) [back to overview]Phase II: The Minimization of Negative Side Effects - Graft Survival
NCT01062555 (6) [back to overview]Phase I: Acute Rejection-Free Survival
NCT01062555 (6) [back to overview]Phase I: The Minimization of Negative Side Effects - Graft Survival
NCT01062555 (6) [back to overview]Phase I: The Minimization of Negative Side Effects - Patient Survival
NCT01062555 (6) [back to overview]Phase II: Acute Rejection-Free Survival
NCT01114529 (4) [back to overview]Incidence of Composite Efficacy Endpoint for Each Arm at Month 12 and Month 24
NCT01114529 (4) [back to overview]Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
NCT01114529 (4) [back to overview]Change in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMi) From Randomization to Month 12 and Month 24
NCT01114529 (4) [back to overview]Comparison of Incidence Rates of Efficacy Endpoints Between Treatment Arms (Full Analysis Set - 24 Month Analysis)
NCT01120028 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Cancer (at 18-months After Randomization to Maintenance Therapy)
NCT01120028 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection at 6-months After Randomization to Induction Therapy
NCT01120028 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Infection (at 18-months After Randomization to Maintenance Therapy)
NCT01120028 (8) [back to overview]Graft Function (at 18-months After Randomization to Maintenance Therapy)
NCT01120028 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Infection (at 6-months After Randomization to Induction Therapy)
NCT01120028 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Major Vascular Event (at 18-months After Randomization to Maintenance Therapy)
NCT01120028 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Graft Failure (at 6-months After Randomization to Induction Therapy)
NCT01120028 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Graft Failure (at 18-Months After Randomization to Maintenance Therapy)
NCT01135329 (1) [back to overview]Graft Failure
NCT01139450 (1) [back to overview]Incidence of Success Based on the Investigator's Global Evaluation at the End of Treatment
NCT01150097 (6) [back to overview]Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR ), Graft Loss or Death
NCT01150097 (6) [back to overview]Incidence Rate of tBPAR
NCT01150097 (6) [back to overview]Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR ), Graft Loss or Death
NCT01150097 (6) [back to overview]Change in Renal Function
NCT01150097 (6) [back to overview]Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Graft Loss or Death
NCT01150097 (6) [back to overview]Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Graft Loss or Death
NCT01162005 (2) [back to overview]Remission Rate
NCT01162005 (2) [back to overview]Duration of Remission
NCT01168219 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01168219 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01168219 (3) [back to overview]100-day Mortality
NCT01169701 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Biomarkers, C-reactive Protein (CRP)
NCT01169701 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Major Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
NCT01169701 (14) [back to overview]Renal Function Measured by Serum Creatinine
NCT01169701 (14) [back to overview]Renal Function as Measured by Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
NCT01169701 (14) [back to overview]Renal Function as Measured by Creatinine Clearance
NCT01169701 (14) [back to overview]Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV)
NCT01169701 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss, Death and Lost to Follow up
NCT01169701 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, Type 1 Procollagen Amino-terminal-propeptide (PINP)
NCT01169701 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide Fraction (NT-proBNP)
NCT01169701 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI)
NCT01169701 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, Myeloperoxidase (MPO)
NCT01169701 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT01169701 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean 24 Hour Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT01169701 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Biomarkers: Troponin I and Collagen Type 1 C-telopeptide (ICTP)
NCT01181271 (12) [back to overview]Estimated Two Year Progression Free Survival Rate for Participants Undergoing Only Autologous Transplant
NCT01181271 (12) [back to overview]Estimated Two Year Progression Free Survival Rate for All Participants
NCT01181271 (12) [back to overview]Estimated Two Year Progression Free Survival Rate for Participants Undergoing Both Autologous and Allogeneic Transplants
NCT01181271 (12) [back to overview]Peripheral Blood All-cell Donor Chimerism
NCT01181271 (12) [back to overview]Number of Days After Allogeneic Transplant Until Absolute Neutrophil Count Was Equal to or Greater Than 500/uL
NCT01181271 (12) [back to overview]Estimated Two Year Overall Survival Rate for Participants Undergoing Only Autologous Transplant
NCT01181271 (12) [back to overview]Estimated Two Year Overall Survival Rate for Participants Undergoing Both Autologous and Allogeneic Transplants
NCT01181271 (12) [back to overview]Estimated Two Year Overall Survival Rate for All Participants
NCT01181271 (12) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Grades II to IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
NCT01181271 (12) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Non-relapse Mortality
NCT01181271 (12) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Extensive Chronic Graft-versus-host-disease
NCT01181271 (12) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Disease Relapse
NCT01187953 (2) [back to overview]For the 24-month Analysis, the Endpoint Includes Additional Treatment Failures That Occurred During the 12-month Treatment Extension Period, up to Day 734 After the Randomization Date.
NCT01187953 (2) [back to overview]The Primary Efficacy Endpoint for the Study is the Proportion of Treatment Failures Within 12 Months After Randomization to Study Drug.
NCT01246206 (8) [back to overview]Safety Defined by Serious Adverse Events
NCT01246206 (8) [back to overview]Severity of Acute GVHD
NCT01246206 (8) [back to overview]"Determine Time to Engraftment (G500)"
NCT01246206 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival at Two Year,
NCT01246206 (8) [back to overview]"Determine Time to Engraftment (PLT20)"
NCT01246206 (8) [back to overview]Determine Incidence of Opportunistic Infections
NCT01246206 (8) [back to overview]Estimate Incidence of Chronic GVHD at Two Years
NCT01246206 (8) [back to overview]Incidence of Acute GVHD
NCT01256294 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
NCT01256294 (6) [back to overview]Trough Plasma Drug Concentration (C0) at Steady State
NCT01256294 (6) [back to overview]Dose-Normalized Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 12 Hours (AUC0-12h) at Steady State
NCT01256294 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Reported Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection Episodes
NCT01256294 (6) [back to overview]Dose-normalized Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) at Steady State
NCT01256294 (6) [back to overview]Intra-patient Variability of Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetic Parameters
NCT01256398 (6) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS)
NCT01256398 (6) [back to overview]Probability of Being BCR-ABL Negative in the Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood at the Completion of the CNS Prophylaxis Course (Restricted to Those Patients Achieving a CR)
NCT01256398 (6) [back to overview]Response
NCT01256398 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01256398 (6) [back to overview]Feasibility of Maintenance Therapy in This Patient Population (Restricted to Those Patients Achieving a CR). Feasibility Will be Defined as the Number of Deaths Ocuring.
NCT01256398 (6) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival Defined From the Date of First Induction Complete Response (CR) to Relapse or Death Due to Any Cause
NCT01265537 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dialysis Events
NCT01265537 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Graft Failure
NCT01265537 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hospitalization Events
NCT01265537 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Event
NCT01265537 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weight
NCT01265537 (12) [back to overview]eGFR at 6 Months
NCT01265537 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Acute Rejection
NCT01265537 (12) [back to overview]Number of Any Leukopenia Events
NCT01265537 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Infection Events
NCT01265537 (12) [back to overview]Number of Leukopenia Events on ≥2 Occasions
NCT01265537 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participant Deaths
NCT01265537 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Malignancy Events
NCT01278745 (13) [back to overview]Re-transplantation or Re-listed for Transplantation
NCT01278745 (13) [back to overview]Number of Episodes of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) of Any Grade Per Participant
NCT01278745 (13) [back to overview]Incidence of AMR
NCT01278745 (13) [back to overview]Death
NCT01278745 (13) [back to overview]Change in Percent Atheroma Volume (PAV)
NCT01278745 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Post-transplant Serious Infections Requiring Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy
NCT01278745 (13) [back to overview]Incidence of Cellular Rejection
NCT01278745 (13) [back to overview]Incidence of Any Treated Rejection
NCT01278745 (13) [back to overview]Incidence of BPAR (Any Grade)
NCT01278745 (13) [back to overview]Post-transplant Safety Outcomes Among Participants: Safety and Tolerability of Rituximab
NCT01278745 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Development of Angiographically Evident Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy
NCT01278745 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Episodes of Rejection Associated With Hemodynamic Compromise (HDC)
NCT01278745 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Post-transplant Incidence of PTLD
NCT01288521 (1) [back to overview]Tacrolimus Bioavailability (F)
NCT01303965 (8) [back to overview]Phase II: Percent of Patients Alive and Free of Progression at 12 Months Following Transplant
NCT01303965 (8) [back to overview]Phase II - Percent of Patients With Treatment-related Deaths at 1 Year
NCT01303965 (8) [back to overview]Phase II - Percent of Patients With Treatment-related Deaths at 100 Days
NCT01303965 (8) [back to overview]Phase II - Percent of Patients With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)
NCT01303965 (8) [back to overview]Phase II - Percent of Patients With Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)
NCT01303965 (8) [back to overview]Phase II - Time to Neutrophil Engraftment
NCT01303965 (8) [back to overview]Phase II - Time to Platelet Engraftment
NCT01303965 (8) [back to overview]Phase I: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Immunosuppression-free Duration in Days, Defined as Time From Completion of Immunosuppression Withdrawal to End of Trial Participation or to Time of Restarting Immunosuppression
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Requiring Anti-lymphocyte Therapy (OKT3, ATG) for an Acute Rejection Event
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Successfully Withdrawn From Immunosuppression and Remained Off Immunosuppression for at Least 52 Weeks
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Transplant Participants Who Died
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Transplanted Participants Who Achieve Either Sirolimus Monotherapy or Monotherapy on a Mycophenolic Compound Within 52 Weeks Post-transplant
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Transplanted Participants Who Achieve MMF or Mycophenolic Acid Monotherapy Within 52 Weeks Post-transplant in Those Participants Intolerant of Sirolimus
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Transplanted Participants Who Remain Off Immunosuppression for at Least 52 Weeks Including Those in Whom the 52 Week Biopsy Was Not Performed
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Transplanted Participants Who Remain Off Immunosuppression for the Duration of the Study as Defined as Completion of All Schedules of Events/Followed Through August 25, 2017
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Transplanted Participants With Acute Rejection or Presumed Acute Rejection
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Transplanted Participants With Graft Loss
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Time From Transplant to the First Episode of Acute Rejection Requiring Treatment
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Histological Severity of Biopsies Demonstrating Acute Rejection as Measured by Banff 2007 Grade
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events, Including Number of Post-transplant Infections, Wound Complications, Lymphocoele, Post-transplant Diabetes Mellitus, and Malignancies
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Chronic T Cell-mediated or Antibody-mediated Rejection
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Participant Diastolic Blood Pressure Over Time
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Participant Glucose Level Over Time
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Participant Systolic Blood Pressure Over Time
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Participant Total Cholesterol Over Time
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Participant Renal Function as Measured by GFR Using CKD-EPI
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Time From Completion of Immunosuppression Withdrawal to First Episode of Acute Rejection or Presumed Acute Rejection
NCT01318915 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Transplanted Participants Who Achieve Sirolimus Monotherapy Within 52 Weeks Post-transplant
NCT01323920 (4) [back to overview]The Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD Requiring Systemic Immune Suppression up to 1 Year After Stem Cell Infusion
NCT01323920 (4) [back to overview]The Cumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD up to Day 100 After Stem Cell Infusion
NCT01323920 (4) [back to overview]The Non-relapse Mortality, Progression-free and Overall Survival up to 1 Year After Stem Cell Infusion
NCT01323920 (4) [back to overview]The Percentage Donor Engraftment up to Day 30 Post Stem Cell Infusion
NCT01338987 (4) [back to overview]Time to Engraftment in First Transplant Recipients Only With Median Thoracic Spine Standardized Uptake Values (SUV) of 1.4 or Greater Than Those Patients With SUV's Less Than 1.4
NCT01338987 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
NCT01338987 (4) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events Related to Study Drug Experienced by Participants After Second Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
NCT01338987 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of B Cells at One Year Post-transplant in Participants Who Did/Did Not Receive Leuprolide Following Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
NCT01341301 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants That Experience One Year Relapse Free Survival After Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)
NCT01346397 (2) [back to overview]Patient Survival
NCT01346397 (2) [back to overview]Graft Survival
NCT01350245 (2) [back to overview]Disease-Free Survival (DFS)
NCT01350245 (2) [back to overview]Probability of Overall Survival at 15 Months Post-treatment
NCT01390402 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Molecular Complete Remission at 3 Month Post Transplant
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Type of Treatment of Rejection
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 Criteria
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-Transplant
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplant
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 52
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-Transplant
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse Events
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Rejection
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 52
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 52
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Mean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Number of Events of Death or Graft Loss
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse Events
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Number of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156
NCT01436305 (31) [back to overview]Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156
NCT01438710 (1) [back to overview]Evaluation of Hand Tremor and Stable Kidney Transplant Patients When Switched From Prograf to LCP-Tacro.
NCT01471444 (4) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01471444 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Post Transplant at 1, 3 and 5 Years
NCT01471444 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Non Relapse Mortality at 100 Day Post Transplant
NCT01471444 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants in the Study Who Are With no Grade 3 or 4 Acute Graft-versus-host Disease at Any Time During the First 100 Days Post Transplant.
NCT01490723 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01490723 (2) [back to overview]Treatment-Related Mortality (TRM)
NCT01491958 (5) [back to overview]Time to Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment
NCT01491958 (5) [back to overview]Safety of Atorvastatin in Transplant Recipients in Terms of Adverse Events and Toxicities.
NCT01491958 (5) [back to overview]Non Relapse Mortality (NRM) at One Year
NCT01491958 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD)
NCT01491958 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grades II to IV aGVHD at Day +100 of Atorvastatin Administration
NCT01517984 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants in the Experimental Arm Off Tacrolimus
NCT01517984 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With New Donor Specific Antibodies (DSAs)
NCT01517984 (6) [back to overview]Estimated GFR Using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) Equation
NCT01517984 (6) [back to overview]Allograft Survival Rate
NCT01517984 (6) [back to overview]Participant Survival Rate
NCT01517984 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Acute Rejection
NCT01518153 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01518153 (2) [back to overview]Success Rate
NCT01529827 (4) [back to overview]Median Time to Neutrophil Engraftment
NCT01529827 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) at One Year
NCT01529827 (4) [back to overview]Transplant Related Mortality (TRM)
NCT01529827 (4) [back to overview]Clinical Response
NCT01551212 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With HCV
NCT01551212 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of de Novo HCC Malignancies
NCT01551212 (6) [back to overview]Estimated GFR - PP Set
NCT01551212 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or Death
NCT01551212 (6) [back to overview]Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
NCT01551212 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of HCV Related Fibrosis
NCT01570348 (11) [back to overview]Disease Activity
NCT01570348 (11) [back to overview]Quality of Life Measured Using the Previously Validated Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire
NCT01570348 (11) [back to overview]Regimen-related Toxicity Graded According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4
NCT01570348 (11) [back to overview]Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)
NCT01570348 (11) [back to overview]Development of Infectious Complications
NCT01570348 (11) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT01570348 (11) [back to overview]Incidence and Severity of GVHD
NCT01570348 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01570348 (11) [back to overview]EFS
NCT01570348 (11) [back to overview]Incidence of Disease-modifying Drugs for CD Initiated Post-transplant
NCT01570348 (11) [back to overview]Incidence of Graft Rejection
NCT01572662 (3) [back to overview]Non-Relapse Mortality Rate (NRM)
NCT01572662 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01572662 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01598987 (7) [back to overview]Growth Development - Weight at Baseline and Month 12
NCT01598987 (7) [back to overview]Growth Development - Weight at Baseline and Month 24
NCT01598987 (7) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Failure Rates of Efficacy Endpoints
NCT01598987 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate - Month 12
NCT01598987 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate - Month 24
NCT01598987 (7) [back to overview]Growth Development - Height at Baseline and Month 12
NCT01598987 (7) [back to overview]Growth Development - Height at Baseline and Month 24
NCT01621477 (7) [back to overview]Incidence and Severity of Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
NCT01621477 (7) [back to overview]Disease-Free Survival (DFS)
NCT01621477 (7) [back to overview]Incidence and Severity of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
NCT01621477 (7) [back to overview]One-year Survival (OS)
NCT01621477 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Malignant Relapse
NCT01621477 (7) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS)
NCT01621477 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Transplant Related Mortality (TRM)
NCT01625377 (13) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Treatment Failures
NCT01625377 (13) [back to overview]Number of Patients Reported With Different Categories of Severity of BPAR According to Banff Classification
NCT01625377 (13) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Death or Graft Loss
NCT01625377 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Creatinine Clearance Estimated Using the Adjusted Cockcroft-Gault Formula
NCT01625377 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimated by Abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Formula
NCT01625377 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimated by CKD-EPI Formula
NCT01625377 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Renal Function
NCT01625377 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Serum Creatinine
NCT01625377 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio
NCT01625377 (13) [back to overview]Number of Patients in Different Stages of Chronic Kidney Diseases According to the K/DOQI Classification System
NCT01625377 (13) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Any Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, Death and Premature Discontinuation
NCT01625377 (13) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Treated or Not Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
NCT01625377 (13) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Treated or Untreated BPAR With RAI Score Greater Than 3
NCT01629511 (3) [back to overview]100 Day Treatment Related Mortality (TRM)
NCT01629511 (3) [back to overview]Time-to-engraftment
NCT01629511 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01647945 (3) [back to overview]Efficacy of Low-dose FK-506 in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) Measured by Change in 6-min Walk Distance (6MWD)
NCT01647945 (3) [back to overview]Safety of Low-dose FK-506 in PAH
NCT01647945 (3) [back to overview]Number of Combined Clinical Events
NCT01649427 (6) [back to overview]The Incidence of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss and Death Until Month 12 (Full Analysis Set) (Full Analysis Set)
NCT01649427 (6) [back to overview]ANCOVA Model for Change in MDRD GFR (ml/Min) at Month 6, Without Replacement of Missing Values
NCT01649427 (6) [back to overview]ANCOVA Model for Change in Cockcroft-Gault GFR (ml/Min) at Month 6, Without Replacement of Missing Values
NCT01649427 (6) [back to overview]ANCOVA Model for Change in CKD-EPI GFR (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Glomerular Filtration Rate) at Month 6 Post-transplantation
NCT01649427 (6) [back to overview]ANOVA for Dose-normalized Tacrolimus 12-h-AUC (h/103*L) at Month 1
NCT01649427 (6) [back to overview]ANCOVA Model for Change in Nankivell GFR (mL/Min) at Month 6, Without Replacement of Missing Values (Full Analysis Set)
NCT01649609 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Incidence of BK Nephropathy
NCT01649609 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With BK Viral Load <600 Copies/mL
NCT01650545 (3) [back to overview]Number Of Participants With Chronic Rejection Who Met Primary Combined End-point
NCT01650545 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 5 Years Follow-up
NCT01650545 (3) [back to overview]Cytokine Analysis From BAL Fluid in Lung
NCT01653847 (5) [back to overview]Change in T Cell & B Cell Generation
NCT01653847 (5) [back to overview]Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
NCT01653847 (5) [back to overview]Patient Survival
NCT01653847 (5) [back to overview]Acute Rejection
NCT01653847 (5) [back to overview]Renal Allograft Survival
NCT01655563 (3) [back to overview]Clinical Adverse Events
NCT01655563 (3) [back to overview]Time to Maintain Stable Therapeutic Trough Concentrations
NCT01655563 (3) [back to overview]Time to Achieve Therapeutic Tacrolimus Drug Concentrations
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (AUC) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Daytime, Nighttime Overnight Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) on Day 28.
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (Fluctuation) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (AUC) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Ratio of Nighttime to Daytime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) on Day 14.
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (Tmax) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (Tmax) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (AUC) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (Tmax) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Daytime, Nighttime and Overnight Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) on Day 14.
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Evaluation of the Short-term Efficacy of LCP-Tacro After the Start of Dosing.
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (Cmax and C24) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (Cmax and C24) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (Cmax and C24) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Ratio of Nighttime to Daytime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) on Day 28.
NCT01666951 (16) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (Fluctuation) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation
NCT01680861 (7) [back to overview]eGFR (Renal Function) at Month 3 Post-transplant
NCT01680861 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAI) at 12 Months Post-transplant
NCT01680861 (7) [back to overview]BPAR (Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection) Incidence During the First 12 Months Post-transplant
NCT01680861 (7) [back to overview]Discontinuance of Any Study Medication (Tacrolimus, Everolimus, or EC-MPS)
NCT01680861 (7) [back to overview]eGFR (Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate), i.e., Renal Function, at 1 Month Post-transplant.
NCT01680861 (7) [back to overview]eGFR (Renal Function) at 6 Months Post-transplant
NCT01680861 (7) [back to overview]Graft Loss (Return to Permanent Dialysis or Death)
NCT01685411 (15) [back to overview]Count of Participants Who Achieved Neutrophil Engraftment
NCT01685411 (15) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Disease Free Survival
NCT01685411 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease
NCT01685411 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participant Who Were Alive at 7 Years Post Transplant
NCT01685411 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participant Who Were Alive at 5 Years Post Transplant
NCT01685411 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participant Who Were Alive at 2 Years Post Transplant
NCT01685411 (15) [back to overview]Counts of Participants With Disease Free Survival
NCT01685411 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease by Grade
NCT01685411 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Related Toxicity
NCT01685411 (15) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Disease Free Survival
NCT01685411 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Related Toxicity
NCT01685411 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Relapse
NCT01685411 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Relapse
NCT01685411 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Engraftment Failure
NCT01685411 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Time to Neutrophil Recovery
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD According to BMTCTN
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Grade III-IV Acute GVHD
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Remission After Transplantation
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Primary Graft Failure
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery by Day 30
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01713400 (2) [back to overview]T Regulatory Cell (Treg)/Total Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Ratio
NCT01713400 (2) [back to overview]Incidence of Acute Graft vs. Host Disease (AGVHD)
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]Time to First BPAR
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]Requirement of T-cell Depleting Therapy for Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]# of Patients Developing Denovo Donor Specific Antibody (DSA) Post-transplant
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]# Patients Experiencing a First Biopsy-proven ACR With Severity Banff > or = 2a Grade
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]# Patients Experiencing a Graft Loss But Not Including Patients Who Died With Functioning Graft (Death-censored Graft Loss)
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]# Patients With Composite Endpoint of Either Experiencing Death, Graft Loss, or eGFR < 45ml/Min at 24 Months
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]# Patients With Composite Endpoint of Experiencing Either Death, Graft Loss, or eGFR < 45ml/Min
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]Biopsy Proven Mixed Acute Rejection
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]Delayed Graft Function
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]Discontinuation of Mycophenolate
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Belatacept or Tacrolimus)
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]eGFR (MRDRD) < 45 ml/Min/1.73m2
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]Leukopenia (WBC < 2000/mm3)
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]Mean eGFR (MDRD) (ml/Min/1.73m2)
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]New Onset Diabetes After Transplantation (NODAT)
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]Patient Death
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]Proteinuria UPC Ratio > 0.8
NCT01729494 (21) [back to overview]Steroid Therapy
NCT01754389 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Non-relapse Mortality
NCT01754389 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-free and Overall Survival
NCT01754389 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
NCT01754389 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Incidence of Grade II-IV GVHD
NCT01754389 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Relapse
NCT01773395 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Relapse and/or Non-Relapse Mortality
NCT01773395 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Acute and Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease
NCT01773395 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 or Higher Non-Hematologic or Grade 4 or Higher Hematologic Adverse Events
NCT01773395 (5) [back to overview]18-Month Progression Free Survival
NCT01773395 (5) [back to overview]18-Month Overall Survival
NCT01789255 (7) [back to overview]Mean Percent of Planned Dose Administered
NCT01789255 (7) [back to overview]The Number of Participants That Experience Grade 2-4 Acute GVHD (Graft Versus Host Disease) by Day 100
NCT01789255 (7) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients Alive at 1 Year
NCT01789255 (7) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients Alive Without GVHD or Use of Steroids
NCT01789255 (7) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients With Relapse at 1 Year
NCT01789255 (7) [back to overview]Median Ac-H3 Levels in Patients Treated With Vorinostat and Patients Not Treated With Vorinostat
NCT01789255 (7) [back to overview]Median Plasma Concentration of IL-6 in Patients Treated With Vorinostat and Patients Not Treated With Vorinostat
NCT01790568 (3) [back to overview]Non-Relapse Mortality Incidence
NCT01790568 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Alive at 1 Year
NCT01790568 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients That Experience Grade 2-4 GVHD Within 100 Days of Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participant Diagnosed With BK Polyoma Virus (BKV) and Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Viremia As Adverse Events
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) of Kidney or Pancreatic Transplant During the First 52 Wks Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Mean Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Biopsy-Proven Humoral Rejection During the First 52 Weeks Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants With De Novo Anti-Donor Antibodies or Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Antibodies During the First 52 Weeks Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Full Pancreatic Graft Function (Insulin Independent) at Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Type of Treatment(s) Participants Received for Biopsy-Proven Renal Allograft Rejection During the First 52 Weeks Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Type of Treatment(s) Participants Received for Biopsy-Proven Pancreatic Allograft Rejection During the First 52 Weeks Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement From Baseline (Pre-Transplant) Through Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Severity Grade of First Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (AR) During the First 52 Weeks Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Lipid Profile at Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]HbA1c at Baseline (Pre-Transplant) Through Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Fasting Lipid Profile at Wk 28 Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Fasting Lipid Profile at Baseline (Pre-Transplant)
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS) From Baseline (Pre-Transplant) Through Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline, Wk 28 and Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Successful Discontinuation of Tacrolimus in Recipients Randomized to the Investigational Arm
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants With the Occurrence of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Event of Death, Graft Loss, or Undetectable C-peptide
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model at Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants Diagnosed With Malignancy as an Adverse Event
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants Diagnosed With Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Infection as an Adverse Event
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medication From Baseline (Pre-Transplant) Through Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants With an Infectious Disease Serious Adverse Event(s) Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Defined CKD Stage 4 or 5 at Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function at Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants With eGFR < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 Measured by CKD-EPI at Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Evidence of Pancreatic Loss at Week 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01790594 (30) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Evidence of Partial Pancreatic Graft Function at Week 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Mean Number of Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline of Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) - Adjusted Change
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Heart Rate
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Mean Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR)
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Survive With a Functional Graft at 24 Months
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Survive With a Functional Graft at 12 Months
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline of Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) - Percent Change
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Varying Severity of BPAR
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Slope Analysis of cGFR
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Slope Analysis of 1/Serum Creatinine
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With > 5% and >10% Improvement Over Baseline cGFR
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA)
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Adverse Event of Special Interest
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Number of Antihypertensive Medications Used to Control Hypertension
NCT01820572 (18) [back to overview]Mean Urine Protein/ Creatinine Ratio (UPCR)
NCT01824693 (4) [back to overview]Percent Probability of Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT01824693 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experience Primary Graft Failure Event Between Arms
NCT01824693 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Treatment-Related Mortality (TRM) by Day 100
NCT01824693 (4) [back to overview]Percent Probability of 18 Months-relapse Event Between Arms
NCT01843348 (11) [back to overview]Glomular Filtration Rate (GFR) Via Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Method at Month 12 Post Transplant
NCT01843348 (11) [back to overview]Glomular Filtration Rate (GFR) mL/Min Via Cockcroft- Gault Method at Month 12 Post Transplant
NCT01843348 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Wound Healing
NCT01843348 (11) [back to overview]Glomular Filtration Rate (GFR) Via Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Method at Month 12 Post Transplant
NCT01843348 (11) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Wound Healing Complications During Study
NCT01843348 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure Endpoints at Month 12
NCT01843348 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Composite Treatment Failure Endpoints - Difference Between Groups at Month 12
NCT01843348 (11) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Viral Infections
NCT01843348 (11) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Delayed Graft Function by Day
NCT01843348 (11) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Delayed Graft Function and Slow Graft Function
NCT01843348 (11) [back to overview]Glomular Filtration Rate (GFR) mL/Min Via Nankivell Method at Month 12 - Standard Regimen vs Certican Regimens
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function at Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Defined CKD Stage 4 or 5 at Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection By Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection by Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Measurements Over Time
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Total Daily Prescribed Pill Count
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Type of Rejection Classified by Pathologist - For Cause Kidney Biopsies
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participant Deaths or Graft Loss by Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Fasting Lipid Profile at Baseline (Pre-Transplant)
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wk 28 and Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90 mmHg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Week 52 Post-Transplant -Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With BK Polyoma Virus (BKV) and Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) as Adverse Events by Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade ≥ IA Defined by Banff 2007 Criteria By Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Type of Treatment for Detected Graft Rejection
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With eGFR < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 Measured by CKD-EPI at Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants Experiencing ≥ 1 Adverse Event (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) by Wk 52
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Fasting Lipid Profile at Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Mean Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model at Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medication at Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Fasting Lipid Profile at Wk 28 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy by Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Graft Rejection by Wk 52 Post-Transplant
NCT01856257 (29) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events
NCT01871441 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Relapse of Disease
NCT01871441 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Disease-free Survival (DFS)
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview]To Assess the Proportions of GvHD Response Post-administration of AP1903.
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview]To Evaluate the Safety of Donor Lymphocyte Infusion Followed by Dimerizer Drug, AP1903 by Number of Participants With Adverse Events.
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Assessed Post Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI): Disease-free Survival & Non-relapse Mortality, Chimerism and GVHD.
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview]To Assess the Incidence of GvHD Treatment Failure Post-administration of AP1903.
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview]To Assess Post Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) Chimerism
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview]To Assess the Incidence of Acute GvHD Flare After CR/PR Requiring Additional Agent for Systemic Therapy Before Day 56 Post-administration of AP1903.
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview]To Assess the Incidence of Epstein-Barr Virus -PTLD or EBV Reactivation Requiring Therapy Post DLI.
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview]To Assess the Proportion of Patients Developing Grade I-IV Acute GvHD
NCT01884571 (8) [back to overview]Collection of Blood for Future Analysis of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs)
NCT01884571 (8) [back to overview]Collection of Cerebrospinal Fluid for Future Analysis of Cytokine Levels
NCT01884571 (8) [back to overview]Mean Rate of Change in Grip Strength Treatment Compared to Pre-Treatment
NCT01884571 (8) [back to overview]Mean Rate of Change of ALSFRS-R Scores During Treatment Compared to Pre-Treatment
NCT01884571 (8) [back to overview]Mean Rate of Change of Hand-Held Dynamometry (HHD) During Treatment Compared to Pre-Treatment
NCT01884571 (8) [back to overview]Mean Rate of Change of Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) During Treatment Compared to Pre-Treatment
NCT01884571 (8) [back to overview]Mean Rate of Change of T-cell Subsets in Blood Treatment Compared to Pre-Treatment
NCT01884571 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Average Increase in ALSFRS-R Score of One Point Per Month
NCT01885689 (2) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival at 2 Years
NCT01885689 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 2 Years
NCT01887171 (1) [back to overview]Early Allograft Dysfunction
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Compare Incidence of Notable Safety Events (SAEs, Infections and Serious Infections Leading to Premature Discontinuation)
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Compare Incidence of tAR
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Composite Efficacy Failure of Treated Biopsy in Everolimus With Reduced Tacrolimus Group Compared to Standard Tacrolimus in Patients From Japan Only
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Renal Function by Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (All Extension Patients)
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Composite Efficacy Failure of Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection, Graft Loss or Death in Everolimus With Reduced Tacrolimus Group Compared to Standard Tacrolimus
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Composite of tBPAR, Graft Loss, and Death
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Compare Incidence of Death
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Adverse Events/Infections by SOC
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Compare Renal Function Over Time Assessed by the Change by eGFR, Post-randomization
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Compare Incidence of tBPAR
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Time to Recurrence of HCC in Subjects With a Diagnosis of HCC at the Time of Liver Transplantation
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Renal Function by Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Randomization
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Compare Incidence of a Composite of Death or Graft Loss
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Compare Incidence of AR
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Compare Incidence of BPAR
NCT01888432 (16) [back to overview]Compare Incidence of Graft Loss
NCT01911546 (4) [back to overview]The Number of CMV Viremia
NCT01911546 (4) [back to overview]The Number of Polyoma BK Viremia Patients
NCT01911546 (4) [back to overview]Incidence of Cell Mediated Rejection (CMR)
NCT01911546 (4) [back to overview]Incidence of Antibody Mediated Rejection (ABMR)
NCT01921218 (6) [back to overview]Time to Initiation of Dialysis
NCT01921218 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Donor-specific Antibody Formation
NCT01921218 (6) [back to overview]Number of Infectious Complications
NCT01921218 (6) [back to overview]Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
NCT01921218 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Anti-human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Alloantibodies
NCT01921218 (6) [back to overview]Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
NCT01927120 (11) [back to overview]Incidence of Unexpected or Serious Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01927120 (11) [back to overview]Regulatory T Cells (Tregs)/Total CD4+ Cells at Day 30 Post-HCT
NCT01927120 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival at Day +365
NCT01927120 (11) [back to overview]Incidence of Non-relapse Death
NCT01927120 (11) [back to overview]Function of Blood Treg After Allogeneic HSCT
NCT01927120 (11) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Relapse
NCT01927120 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Treg Among Blood CD4+ T Cells at Day +90 After HCT
NCT01927120 (11) [back to overview]STAT3, STAT5 (Y694), and S6 Phosphorylation Among Treg and Non-Treg at Day 30
NCT01927120 (11) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD by Day +365
NCT01927120 (11) [back to overview]STAT3, STAT5 (Y694), and S6 Phosphorylation Among Treg and Non-Treg at Day 90
NCT01927120 (11) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD by Day +100
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Impaired Glucose Tolerance
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Infection Requiring Hospitalization
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Leukopenia
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Malignancies
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Mouth Ulcers
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Neurotoxicity
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Patient Survival
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Pneumonitis
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Gastrointestinal Complaints
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Cardiovascular Complications
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]BK Nephropathy
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Development of Donor Specific Antibody
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Lipid Levels
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Cytomegalovirus
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Thrombocytopenia
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Renal Function
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Proteinuria
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]BK Infection
NCT01935128 (20) [back to overview]Graft Survival
NCT01936519 (6) [back to overview]Renal Function as Measured by 24 Hour Urine Creatinine Clearance
NCT01936519 (6) [back to overview]Renal Function as Measured by Cockcroft Gault Creatinine Clearance
NCT01936519 (6) [back to overview]Renal Function as Measured by Iothalamate Clearance
NCT01936519 (6) [back to overview]Renal Function as Measured by Serum Creatinine Level
NCT01936519 (6) [back to overview]Renal Function as Measured by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
NCT01936519 (6) [back to overview]Recipient and Donor Genotyping for Selected Variants of CYP3A5, ABCB1 (MDR1), and CYP4A Genes
NCT01938625 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 4 Weeks After the End of Treatment (SVR 4)
NCT01938625 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Viral Relapse
NCT01938625 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After the End of Treatment (SVR 24)
NCT01938625 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Viral Breakthrough
NCT01938625 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With On-Treatment Failure
NCT01938625 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After the End of Treatment (SVR 12)
NCT01938625 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HCV RNA (<) 100 IU/mL at Week 4
NCT01938625 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With HCV RNA (< 25 IU/mL Undetectable) and HCV RNA < 25 IU/mL Detectable
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Renal Function by Alternative Formulae (e.g. CKD-EPI). eGFR Values Reported
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Renal Function Assessed by Creatinine Lab Values
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence of tBPAR (Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection) Excluding Grade IA Rejections
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence of tBPAR (Excluding Grade IA Rejections) or GFR<50 mL/Min/1.73m2
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence of Failure on the Composite of Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR) or Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) < 50 mL/Min/1.73m2.
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence of Failure on the Composite of Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR) or Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) < 50 mL/Min/1.73m2 Among Compliant Subjects.
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence of Failure on the Composite of (Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR), Graft Loss or Death or Loss to Follow-up
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence of Failure on the Composite of (Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR), Graft Loss or Death
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence of Failure on the Composite Endpoint of tBPAR, Graft Loss, Death or eGFR < 50 mL/Min/1.73m2
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence of Failure on the Composite Endpoint of Graft Loss or Death.
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence of eGFR < 50 mL/Min/1.73m2
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence tBPAR (Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection) by Severity and Time to Event (Events)
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence of Death, Graft Loss, tBPAR, BPAR, tAR, AR and Humoral Rejection
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence of Cytomegalovirus and BK Virus, New Onset Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease With Associated Proteinuria and Calcineurin Inhibitor Associated Adverse Events.
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence of Malignancies.
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence of Major Cardiovascular Events.
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Events Leading to Study Regimen Discontinuation.
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence of Composite of tBPAR (Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection)or eGRF<50 mL/Min/1.73m2 by Subgroup
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Urinary Protein and Albumin Excretion by Treatment Estimated by Urinary Protein/Creatinine and Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratios.
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Evolution of Renal Function, as eGFR, Over Time by Slope Analysis.
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Renal Allograft Function : Mean Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, eGFR
NCT01950819 (22) [back to overview]Incidence tBPAR (Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection) by Severity and Time to Event (Participants)
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Elevated Liver Enzymes
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Incidence of Chronic GVHD
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Incidence of Chronic GVHD
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Participants With Acute GVHD
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Time to Platelet Engraftment
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Time to Neutrophil Engraftment
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Severe (Grade 3-4) Mucositis Graded According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Grading Scale
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Using Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) Within 100 Days
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Length of Hospitalization
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Respiratory Failure
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Pulmonary Hemorrhage
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Pulmonary Edema
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Incidence of Infection
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Bilirubin
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Length of Time on Continuous Infusion Narcotics
NCT01951885 (19) [back to overview]Incidence of Nephrotoxicity
NCT01962922 (9) [back to overview]Evaluation of C(Max) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac
NCT01962922 (9) [back to overview]Evaluation of C(Max) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac
NCT01962922 (9) [back to overview]Evaluation of C(Max) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac
NCT01962922 (9) [back to overview]Evaluation of AUC(0-24) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac
NCT01962922 (9) [back to overview]Evaluation of AUC(0-24) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac
NCT01962922 (9) [back to overview]Evaluation of AUC(0-24) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac
NCT01962922 (9) [back to overview]Evaluation of C(Min) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac
NCT01962922 (9) [back to overview]Evaluation of C(Min) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac
NCT01962922 (9) [back to overview]Evaluation of C(Min) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac
NCT01977781 (7) [back to overview]Schirmer Tear Test (mm)
NCT01977781 (7) [back to overview]Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire
NCT01977781 (7) [back to overview]Corneal Epitheliopathy (Corneal Fluorescein Staining Using the NEI Grading Scheme)
NCT01977781 (7) [back to overview]Ocular Burning Sensation, Ocular Discharge, Ocular Redness, Ocular Itching, Foreign Body Sensation
NCT01977781 (7) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure
NCT01977781 (7) [back to overview]Visual Acuity
NCT01977781 (7) [back to overview]Tear Film Break-Up Time
NCT02016625 (12) [back to overview]C24,ss (Maximum Measured Concentration of the FDV [Followed by Tac Treatment] in Plasma at Steady State Over a 24 Hour Dosing Interval)
NCT02016625 (12) [back to overview]Cmax (Maximum Measured Concentration of the Tac in Plasma)
NCT02016625 (12) [back to overview]AUC τ,ss (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of the Analyte in Plasma at Steady State Over a Uniform Dosing Interval τ)
NCT02016625 (12) [back to overview]AUC 0-tz (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of the Tac in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 to the Last Quantifiable Point)
NCT02016625 (12) [back to overview]AUC 0-tz (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of the Cyclo in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 to the Last Quantifiable Point)
NCT02016625 (12) [back to overview]AUC τ,ss (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of the FDV [Followed by Tac Treatment] in Plasma at Steady State Over a Uniform Dosing Interval τ)
NCT02016625 (12) [back to overview]C24,ss (Maximum Measured Concentration of the FDV in Plasma at Steady State Over a 24 Hour Dosing Interval)
NCT02016625 (12) [back to overview]AUC 0-infinity (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of the Tac in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity)
NCT02016625 (12) [back to overview]AUC 0-infinity (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of the Cyclo in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity)
NCT02016625 (12) [back to overview]Cmax,ss (Maximum Measured Concentration of the FDV [Followed by Tac Treatment] in Plasma at Steady State Over a Uniform Dosing Interval τ)
NCT02016625 (12) [back to overview]Cmax,ss (Maximum Measured Concentration of the FDV [Followed by Cyclo Treatment] in Plasma at Steady State Over a Uniform Dosing Interval τ)
NCT02016625 (12) [back to overview]Cmax (Maximum Measured Concentration of the Cyclo in Plasma)
NCT02080195 (5) [back to overview]Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
NCT02080195 (5) [back to overview]Survival
NCT02080195 (5) [back to overview]The Feasibility of the Conditioning Regimen and Post Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Refractory SLE Patients With Donors Having Various Degrees of Matching
NCT02080195 (5) [back to overview]Graft Failure
NCT02080195 (5) [back to overview]Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
NCT02115113 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR) Acute Rejection (AR), Graft Loss (GL) or Death (D)
NCT02115113 (3) [back to overview]Renal Function Assessed by Estimated Glomerular Filtartion Rate (eGFR)
NCT02115113 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Serum Creatinine at 12 Months Post-transplant
NCT02118896 (6) [back to overview]Graft Survival
NCT02118896 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT02118896 (6) [back to overview]Participant Survival
NCT02118896 (6) [back to overview]Time to First BCAR Episode
NCT02118896 (6) [back to overview]Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection (BCAR) Episodes
NCT02118896 (6) [back to overview]Efficacy Failure
NCT02120157 (11) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Non-relapse Mortality
NCT02120157 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Donor Cell Engraftment
NCT02120157 (11) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) Grades 2-4 and Grades 3-4
NCT02120157 (11) [back to overview]Primary and Secondary Graft Failure
NCT02120157 (11) [back to overview]Steroid and Non-steroid Immunosuppressants
NCT02120157 (11) [back to overview]Steroid and Non-steroid Immunosuppressants Use Duration
NCT02120157 (11) [back to overview]Survival
NCT02120157 (11) [back to overview]Incidence of Donor Cell Engraftment
NCT02120157 (11) [back to overview]Survival
NCT02120157 (11) [back to overview]Time to Neutrophil and Platelet Recovery
NCT02120157 (11) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD
NCT02123108 (5) [back to overview]Participants Experiencing Acute Rejection Episode
NCT02123108 (5) [back to overview]Participants Experiencing Graft Failure
NCT02123108 (5) [back to overview]Renal Recovery/ Function
NCT02123108 (5) [back to overview]Participants Experiencing Adverse Event Attributable to Study Drug
NCT02123108 (5) [back to overview]Survival
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes After Transplant
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Percentage of Particpants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (LTAs)
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Time to Event: Graft Loss and Death
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With De Novo Donor Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies (DSA)
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Donor Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies (DSA)
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With BANFF Grade by Severity Grades. BANFF Type (Grade) for Acute/Active Rejection
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Survive With a Functioning Graft
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Graft Loss Post Transplant
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants Deaths Post Transplant
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Median Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR)
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Mean Changes From Baseline Values of Lipid Values
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Mean Changes From Baseline Values for Blood Pressure
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Mean Change From Month 3 in cGFR
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Percentage of Clinically-suspected Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (CSBPAR) at 6 Months
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Treatment Differences in Therapeutic Modalities
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio (UPr/Cr)
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Mean and Mean Change From Baseline in Whole Blood HbA1c
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Mean and Mean Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Clinically-suspected Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (CSBPAR) at 6, 12 and 24 Months
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Events of Special Interest (ESIs)
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Absolute Values of Fasting Lipid Values: Median
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Absolute Values of Fasting Lipid Values: Mean
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Absolute Values of Blood Pressure: Median
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Absolute Values of Blood Pressure: Mean
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Absolute Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR): Mean
NCT02137239 (28) [back to overview]Time to Clinically-suspected Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (CSBPAR).
NCT02145403 (8) [back to overview]Phase II: Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Overall Survival Time
NCT02145403 (8) [back to overview]Phase II: Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Progression/Relapse-free Survival Time
NCT02145403 (8) [back to overview]"Phase II: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Patients Who Are Alive and Have Not Developed Any Event"
NCT02145403 (8) [back to overview]Number of Regimen Related Toxicities (RRTs)
NCT02145403 (8) [back to overview]Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Carfilzomib
NCT02145403 (8) [back to overview]Phase II: Cumulative Incidence of Acute GVHD
NCT02145403 (8) [back to overview]Phase II: Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD
NCT02145403 (8) [back to overview]Phase II: Cumulative Incidence of Non-relapse Mortality
NCT02152345 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Delayed Graft Function (DGF)
NCT02152345 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Allograft Survival
NCT02152345 (4) [back to overview]Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
NCT02152345 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Allograft Rejection Episode
NCT02158052 (2) [back to overview]Anti-Tumor Response Rate
NCT02158052 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Without Renal Allograft Rejection at 6 Months Post-transplant
NCT02188719 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Attributable to the Donor Alloantigen Reactive Tregs (darTregs) Infusion
NCT02188719 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Wound Complication(s) Adverse Event(s)
NCT02188719 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy-Proven Acute and/or Chronic Rejection
NCT02188719 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Infectious Adverse Event(s)
NCT02188719 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher Hematologic Adverse Events (AEs) of Anemia, Neutropenia, and/or Thrombocytopenia
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Secondary Graft Failure
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Transplant-related Morbidity
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Transplant-related Mortality (TRM)
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants by Severity With Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) in the First 100 Days After HCT
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants by Severity With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) in the First 100 Days After HCT
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Neutrophil Engraftment
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Malignant Relapse
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02206035 (6) [back to overview]Score of Anxiety Symptoms Using the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) Instrument
NCT02206035 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Not Experiencing Grade II-IV Acute Graph Versus Host Disease (aGVHD)
NCT02206035 (6) [back to overview]Score of Depressive Symptoms Using General Depressive Subscale of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) Instrument
NCT02206035 (6) [back to overview]Score of Pain Symptoms Using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Instrument (Interference)
NCT02206035 (6) [back to overview]Score of Sleep Symptoms Using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Instrument
NCT02206035 (6) [back to overview]Score of Fatigue Symptoms Using the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) Instrument
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD Requiring Immunosupressive Therapy
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Relapse or Progression
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Transplant-Related Mortality (TRM)
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With GVHD/Relapse or Progression-free Survival (GRFS)
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With GVHD-free Survival
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade III-IV Acute GVHD
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Donor Cell Engraftment
NCT02213068 (4) [back to overview]Change in eGFR (MDRD) at 2 Years Post-transplant Compared to Baseline at Month 3 (Conversion)
NCT02213068 (4) [back to overview]Graft Survival
NCT02213068 (4) [back to overview]Patient Survival
NCT02213068 (4) [back to overview]Acute Rejection
NCT02217410 (12) [back to overview]CFZ533 Plasma PK Concentrations - Part II
NCT02217410 (12) [back to overview]Anti-CFZ533 Antibodies - Part II
NCT02217410 (12) [back to overview]Anti-CFZ533 Antibodies - Part II
NCT02217410 (12) [back to overview]Mean Tmax Pharmacokinetic Parameter - Part I
NCT02217410 (12) [back to overview]Mean Cmax Pharmacokinetic Parameter- Part I
NCT02217410 (12) [back to overview]Mean AUClast Pharmacokinetic Parameter - Part I
NCT02217410 (12) [back to overview]Anti-CFZ533 Antibodies - Part I
NCT02217410 (12) [back to overview]Total Soluble CD40 and Total Soluble CD154 Concentrations in Plasma - Part 1
NCT02217410 (12) [back to overview]Total sCD40 Plasma Concentrations - Part II
NCT02217410 (12) [back to overview]Free CD40 and Total CD40 on B Cells - Part II
NCT02217410 (12) [back to overview]eGFR - Part II
NCT02217410 (12) [back to overview]Efficacy as Defined by the Frequency and Severity (Banff Classification) of Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR) Adjudicated Data - Part II
NCT02224872 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Major Toxicities Related to Transplant
NCT02224872 (11) [back to overview]Length of Time Required for Patients to Recover ANC and Platelet Counts After Transplant
NCT02224872 (11) [back to overview]Participants That Were GVHD Free, Relapse Free Survival (GRFS)
NCT02224872 (11) [back to overview]Is This Type of Transplantation for Severe Aplastic Anemia Feasible and Safe?
NCT02224872 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients That Have Survived at One Year
NCT02224872 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade II-IV or Grade III-IV Acute GVHD
NCT02224872 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Primary or Secondary Graft Failure Following Transplant
NCT02224872 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients That Have Acheived Full Donor Chimerism by Day 60 After Transplant
NCT02224872 (11) [back to overview]Participants With Chronic GVHD at One Year
NCT02224872 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients That Expired Due to Transplant Related Mortality
NCT02224872 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients That Expired Due to Non-relapsed-related Mortality Following Transplant
NCT02248597 (5) [back to overview]Rate of Acute GvHD
NCT02248597 (5) [back to overview]Relapse-free Mortality
NCT02248597 (5) [back to overview]12 Month Disease Free Survival Probability
NCT02248597 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02248597 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT02328755 (8) [back to overview]Non-Relapse Mortality
NCT02328755 (8) [back to overview]Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peg-IFN-α
NCT02328755 (8) [back to overview]Phase 2: Number of Patients That Relapse
NCT02328755 (8) [back to overview]Phase 2: Number of Patients That Relapse
NCT02328755 (8) [back to overview]Phase 2: Overall Survival Time
NCT02328755 (8) [back to overview]Acute GVHD
NCT02328755 (8) [back to overview]Phase 2: Overall Survival Time
NCT02328755 (8) [back to overview]Phase 2: Event Free Survival Time
NCT02339246 (3) [back to overview]Evaluation of T(Max) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.
NCT02339246 (3) [back to overview]Evaluation of C(Max) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.
NCT02339246 (3) [back to overview]Evaluation of AUC(0-24) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Participants With Primary Graft Failure
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD-free Survival
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Participants With Immunosuppression-free Survival
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Participants With Grade ≥ 3 Toxicity
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Relapse-free Survival
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil Engraftment
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Relapse
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Incidence of Infections
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Secondary Graft Failure
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Chronic GVHD-free, Relapse-free Survival (CRFS) Probability
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HQL) - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT)
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HQL) - MDASI
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HQL) - Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF36)
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HQL) - PedsQL
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Participants Infected Post Transplant
NCT02345850 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Acute GVHD
NCT02373202 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Metabolic Parameters
NCT02373202 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02373202 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters
NCT02373202 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
NCT02373202 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes
NCT02373202 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints Based on C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)
NCT02373202 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters
NCT02373202 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function Parameters
NCT02373202 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, 50 and 70 Responses at Week 52
NCT02373202 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities
NCT02373202 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 52
NCT02435901 (3) [back to overview]Event Free Survival; Number of Participants Who Survived at 2 Years
NCT02435901 (3) [back to overview]Assessment of Treatment Related Mortality and Morbidity
NCT02435901 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Sustained Cell Engraftment of Donor Cells
NCT02444143 (2) [back to overview]Difference in Time to Therapeutic Level
NCT02444143 (2) [back to overview]Difference in Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC-0-24)) in Obese Patients Who Received an Initial TAC -ER Dose of 0.15 mg/kg Using aBW Versus IBW
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Duration of Delayed Graft Function (DGF), Defined as Time From Transplantation to the Last Required Dialysis Treatment.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between Post-transplant Nadir and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between Post-transplant Nadir and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between 6 Months and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With BK Viremia That Require a Change in Immunosuppression or Anti-viral Treatment as Per Standard of Care at the Site.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR).
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR) or Borderline Rejection.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR) or Borderline Rejection
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]eGFR Values as Measured by MDRD
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Locally Treated Rejection, Defined as Treatment Administered for Rejection Based on Clinical Signs or Biopsy Findings.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]eGFR Values as Measured by CKD-EPI
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Immediately After Surgery) in Serum Creatinine.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants With a Serum Creatinine of More Than 3 mg/dL.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection AMR or Suspicious for AMR.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants Whose Day 5 Serum CRR Was Less Than 70%.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants Whose Day 2 Serum CRR Was Less Than 30%.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants Who Need Dialysis After Week 1.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]The Difference Between the Mean eGFR (Modified MDRD) in the Experimental vs. Control Groups.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Primary Non-Function (PNF), Defined as Dialysis-dependency for More Than 3 Months.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Only Graft Failure.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Mycobacterial or Fungal Infections
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Malignancy.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]BANFF Grades of First AMR.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between 3 Months and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between 3 Months and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between 6 Months and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Locally Treated Rejection, Defined as Treatment Administered for Rejection Based on Clinical Signs or Biopsy Findings.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection AMR or Suspicious for AMR
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR).
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR)
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Impaired Wound Healing Manifested by Wound Dehiscence, Wound Infection, or Hernia at the Site of the Transplant Incision
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With BANFF Chronicity Scores > or Equal 2 on the 24 Month Biopsy.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Any Infection Requiring Hospitalization or Resulting in Death.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants That Required at Least One Dialysis Treatment.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Number of Dialysis Sessions.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]eGFR Values as Measured by MDRD
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]eGFR Values as Measured by CKD-EPI
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Death or Graft Failure.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With de Novo DSA.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With CMV Viremia That Require a Change in Immunosuppression or Anti-viral Treatment as Per Standard of Care at the Site
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Days From Transplantation Until Event (ACR, AMR, or Hospitalization for Infection and/or Malignancy)
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Creatinine Reduction Ratio (CRR), Defined as the First Creatinine on Day 5 Divided by the First Creatinine After Surgery.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Creatinine Reduction Ratio (CRR), Defined as the First Creatinine on Day 2 Divided by he First Creatinine After Surgery
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Number of Participants Who Experience Graft Failure, Day 360 (D60)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Number of Participants Who Experience Grades III-IV GVHD, Day 360 (D60)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Relapse, Day 360 (D60)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Non-relapse Mortality, Days 90-180 (D90)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Non-relapse Mortality, Days 60-180 (D60)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Graft Failure, Days 60-180 (D60)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Graft Failure, Days 90-180 (D90)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Non-relapse Mortality, Day 360 (D60)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Disease Relapse, Days 60-180 (D60)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Non-relapse Mortality, Day 360 (D90)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Grades III-IV GVHD, Day 360 (D90)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Disease Relapse, Days 90-180 (D90)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Number of Participants With Severe Chronic GVHD, Day 360 (D90)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Number of Participants With Severe Chronic GVHD, Day 360 (D60)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Number of Participants Who Experience Graft Failure, Day 360 (D90)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Are Able to Stop Prophylactic Tacrolimus (D90 Cohort)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Are Able to Stop Prophylactic Tacrolimus (D60 Cohort)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grades III-IV Acute GVHD, Days 90-180 (D90)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grades III-IV Acute GVHD, Days 60-180 (D60)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Chronic GVHD, Days 90-180 (D90)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Chronic GVHD, Days 60-180 (D60)
NCT02556931 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Relapse, Day 360 (D90)
NCT02588339 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Primary Disease Relapse
NCT02588339 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02588339 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Relapse-free Survival (RFS)
NCT02588339 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Stratified by Acute Graft Versus Host Disease GVHD Stage
NCT02588339 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Stratified by Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) Stage
NCT02588339 (7) [back to overview]Time to Stable Engraftment
NCT02588339 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Non-relapse Mortality
NCT02652468 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02652468 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Absolute Neutrophil Count >= 500/Mcl for 3 Consecutive Measurements on Different Days and Platelet Count > 20,000/mm^3 With no Platelet Transfusions in the Preceding 7 Days
NCT02652468 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade III-IV Acute GVHD as Determined by International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) Severity Index Criteria
NCT02652468 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT02652468 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Graft Failure
NCT02652468 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Severe Chronic GVHD
NCT02652468 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality
NCT02663622 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT02663622 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Non-Relapse Mortality (NRM) Following HCT
NCT02663622 (13) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HCT)
NCT02663622 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Chronic GVHD Following HCT
NCT02663622 (13) [back to overview]Open Label Expansion Arm Only: Grade III-IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Free Survival (AGFS)
NCT02663622 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT02663622 (13) [back to overview]Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HCT)
NCT02663622 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE
NCT02663622 (13) [back to overview]GVHD-Free and Relapse-Free Survival (GRFS) Following HCT
NCT02663622 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Relapse Following HCT
NCT02663622 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Infection Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HCT)
NCT02663622 (13) [back to overview]Grade II-IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Free Survival (AGFS)
NCT02663622 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade II to IV Acute GVHD Following HCT
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of DSA Positive Participants With DSA Persistence
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of DSA Positive Participants With Human Leukocyte Antigen, Class II, DQ Locus (HLA-DQ)
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Died
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Lost to Follow-up
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive for de Novo DSA (dnDSA) or Immune Activation (IA) Occurrence
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive for IA Occurrence From Day 1 to Day 365 Visit
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive for IA Occurrence From Day 30 to Day 365 Visit
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Five-point Decline in eGFR
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Acute ABMR
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection (TCMR)
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Any Additional Findings
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Any Antibody-Mediated Rejection (ABMR)
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Peak Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) of DSA Positive Participants
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Glomerular Basement Membrane Double Contours (cg) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Presence of Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy (IFTA) and Inflammation on Biopsy
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Presence of Microcirculatory Inflammation (MI) on Biopsy
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of HLA-DQ DSA
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Presence of Transplant Glomerulopathy (TG) on Biopsy
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of Acute Forms of ABMR
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of Acute TCMR
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of Borderline Changes
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Arteriolar Hyalinosis (ah) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive, Negative or Indeterminate for dnDSA Occurrence
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive or Negative for DSA Immunoglobulin G (IgG3) Isotype
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive or Negative for Complement Component 1, Q Subcomponent (C1q)-Binding DSA
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of DSA Positive Participants With Weak, Moderate and Strong Antibody Strentgh
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]eGFR at Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 270 and Day 365
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Time to Occurrence of Death
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of TG on Biopsy
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of Local BPAR
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of IFTA
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of IA
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of C1q-binding DSA
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of Chronic Forms of ABMR
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of Chronic TCMR
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of DSA
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of DSA IgG3 Isotype
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Intimal Arteritis (v) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Borderline Changes
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Vascular Fibrous Intimal Thickening (cv) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Tubulitis (t) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Tubular Atrophy (ct) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event(TEAEs), Related TEAEs, Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (TESAEs), Related TESAEs, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment and TEAEs Leading to Death
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Normal Biopsy Findings
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With IA Persistence
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Threshold of <30 Millimetre Per Minute Per 1.73 Meter Square (mL/Min/1.73m^2)
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Either Graft Loss, Death, BPAR or Lost to Follow-up
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With eGFR Threshold of <50 mL/Min/1.73m^2
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With eGFR Threshold of <40 mL/Min/1.73m^2
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic TCMR
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic ABMR
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With C4d Deposition Without Active Rejection
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Peritubular Capillaritis (Ptc) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Mononuclear Cell Interstitial Inflammation (i) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Mesangial Matrix Expansion (mm) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Interstitial Fibrosis (ci) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade I, II and III IFTA
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade I, II and III Acute ABMR
NCT02723591 (61) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Glomerulitis (g) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants Having Any Abnormality of Potential Clinical Importance of Vital Signs Results
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Are Dialysis Independent at Visits up to 12 Months Post-transplant
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants Requiring Dialysis During the First 7 Days Post Transplant
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants in the First 7 Days With: Primary Non Function, Functional DGF, Intermediate Graft Function, Immediate Graft Function
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Serum Concentrations of GSK1070806
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Serum Creatinine at Baseline and Change From Baseline Over Time Post Transplant
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Serum Interferon Gamma-induced Protein 10 (IP-10) and Serum Monokine Induced Gamma Interferon (Mig) Levels at Baseline and Change From Baseline Over Time Post Transplant
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Urine Volume at Baseline and Change From Baseline Over Time Post Transplant
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants Having Infections
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of GSK1070806
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants Having Any Abnormality in Hematology Results of Potential Clinical Importance
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants Having Any Abnormal Clinical Chemistry Results of Potential Clinical Importance
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Baseline and Change From Baseline in Serum Levels of Free, Total, and GSK1070806 Bound Interleukin 18 (IL-18) Over Time Post-transplant
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From Time 0 to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-t]) and AUC From Time 0 to Infinite Time (AUC[0-inf]) of GSK1070806
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Episodes of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection
NCT02723786 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dialysis Events in the First 30 Days Post-transplant
NCT02736227 (1) [back to overview]Amount of Treg Cells Observed in Peripheral Blood in Patients With and Without Rejection
NCT02791308 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Success at Visit 4/Day 15
NCT02833805 (12) [back to overview]Transplant-related Mortality
NCT02833805 (12) [back to overview]Probability of Platelet Recovery as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Have Recovered Platelet Counts
NCT02833805 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Chronic GVHD
NCT02833805 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Grades II-IV Acute GVHD
NCT02833805 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Grades III-IV Acute GVHD
NCT02833805 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Primary Graft Failure
NCT02833805 (12) [back to overview]GVHD-free Relapse-free Survival (GRFS)
NCT02833805 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Secondary Graft Failure
NCT02833805 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Full Donor Chimerism
NCT02833805 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival and Engraftment at One Year
NCT02833805 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival at One Year
NCT02833805 (12) [back to overview]Probability of Neutrophil Recovery as Assessed by the Number of Participants Who Have Recovered Neutrophil Counts
NCT02866682 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Infectious Episodes at 1 Year
NCT02866682 (8) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of Acute Rejection, Failure, Death
NCT02866682 (8) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of Acute Rejection, Failure, Death
NCT02866682 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Graft Rejection at 1 Year
NCT02866682 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Graft Failure at 1 Year
NCT02866682 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Adhered to Medication Regimen
NCT02866682 (8) [back to overview]Death or Loss-to-follow-up at 1 Year
NCT02866682 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Malignancy at 1 Year
NCT02877082 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients Alive and Free of Severe Acute GVHD Following HLA Matched Related or Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Peripheral Blood Transplant
NCT02877082 (2) [back to overview]Total Number of Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Events Related to This Immunosuppressive Regimen
NCT02891603 (2) [back to overview]Incidence of Acute GVHD
NCT02891603 (2) [back to overview]STAT Activity
NCT02918292 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Graft-Failure-Free Survival
NCT02918292 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02918292 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery
NCT02918292 (15) [back to overview]Participants With Grade 3-5 Toxicities by SOC
NCT02918292 (15) [back to overview]Immune Reconstitution of Quantitative Immunoglobulins
NCT02918292 (15) [back to overview]Immune Reconstitution of Flow Cytometry
NCT02918292 (15) [back to overview]Health Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) - PedsQL Stem Cell Transplant Module
NCT02918292 (15) [back to overview]Health Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) - Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (MOS SF-36)
NCT02918292 (15) [back to overview]Frequencies of Infections Categorized by Infection Type
NCT02918292 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) or Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease (PTLD)
NCT02918292 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Secondary Graft Failure
NCT02918292 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Primary Graft Failure
NCT02918292 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery
NCT02918292 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Acute Graft-vs-host-disease (GVHD)
NCT02918292 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD
NCT02921789 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (rFSGS) or Death or Graft Loss or Lost to Follow-up Through 3 Months Post Transplant
NCT02921789 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven rFSGS Through 3, 6 and 12 Months Post-Transplant
NCT02921789 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) Through 3, 6, and 12 Months Post Transplant
NCT02921789 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With rFSGS or Death or Graft Loss or Lost to Follow-up Through 6 and 12 Months Post Transplant
NCT02921789 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure Through 12 Months Post Transplant
NCT02953873 (5) [back to overview]Dose Modifications
NCT02953873 (5) [back to overview]Total Daily Dose
NCT02953873 (5) [back to overview]Number of Days to Reach Therapeutic Trough Goal
NCT02953873 (5) [back to overview]Dose-normalized Trough
NCT02953873 (5) [back to overview]Weight-Based Dose Requirement
NCT02954198 (4) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Experiencing Acute Allograft Rejection
NCT02954198 (4) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Who Experienced Kidney Transplant Graft Loss
NCT02954198 (4) [back to overview]Self-reported Medication Adherence From Baseline to 6 Months.
NCT02954198 (4) [back to overview]Subject Specific Change on Medication Side Effect Scale
NCT03020589 (7) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Chronic Renal Impairment by eGFR Category
NCT03020589 (7) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Outcomes
NCT03020589 (7) [back to overview]Tacrolimus Level
NCT03020589 (7) [back to overview]Mean Number of Dose Adjustments and/or Drug Alterations
NCT03020589 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Reaching Target Tacrolimus Levels (8-10 ng/mL) on Day 7 After Kidney Transplantation
NCT03020589 (7) [back to overview]Number of Events of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
NCT03020589 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Reaching Target Tacrolimus Levels (8-10 ng/mL) on Day 3 After Kidney Transplantation
NCT03096782 (3) [back to overview]Time to Engraftment
NCT03096782 (3) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival
NCT03096782 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT03107611 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Modified Intent to Treat Subjects With Success on Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (Success Being a Score of Clear [0] or Almost Clear [1])
NCT03107611 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Per Protocol Subjects With Success on Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (Success Being a Score of Clear [0] or Almost Clear [1])
NCT03107611 (4) [back to overview]Change in Severity of Four Individual Signs and Symptoms
NCT03107611 (4) [back to overview]Evaluation of Application Site Reactions
NCT03128359 (3) [back to overview]Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (aGVHD) of Grades 2-4 According to the Consensus Grading
NCT03128359 (3) [back to overview]Graft-Versus-Host Disease-Free, Relapse-Free Survival (GRFS) at 1 Year
NCT03128359 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) at 1 Year
NCT03152019 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Experiencing an Improvement in Their Nosebleeds
NCT03194321 (3) [back to overview]Tolerability as Defined by the Number of Subjects Discontinuing the Study Medication
NCT03194321 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events and Treatment Failure
NCT03194321 (3) [back to overview]Change in Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA) as Defined by the DSA Relative Intensity Score (RIS)
NCT03270462 (3) [back to overview]Change in Quality of Life
NCT03270462 (3) [back to overview]Kidney Function: Serum Creatinine Levels
NCT03270462 (3) [back to overview]Therapeutic Tacrolimus Drug Levels
NCT03289650 (5) [back to overview]Change in Kidney Transplant Function From 2 Weeks Post Transplant Through 12 Months Post Transplant
NCT03289650 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Acute Rejection at 3 Months and 12 Months Post-Transplant
NCT03289650 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change in Allograft Immunohistopathology Profile
NCT03289650 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Deceased at at 3 Months and 12 Months Post-Transplant
NCT03289650 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Graft Loss at 3 Months and 12 Months Post-Transplant
NCT03388008 (1) [back to overview]Donor-specific HLA Antibodies, Re-transplantation, or Death
NCT03437577 (1) [back to overview]Change in Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)
NCT03527238 (1) [back to overview]Tacrolimus Target Trough Level Maintenance
NCT03626714 (6) [back to overview]Drug Concentrations in Blood Samples at Individual Time-points
NCT03626714 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects That Experienced Treatment-related Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
NCT03626714 (6) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half-life [t1/2]
NCT03626714 (6) [back to overview]Blood Concentration-time Curve [AUC]
NCT03626714 (6) [back to overview]Mean Blood Concentration-time Curve - Cmax
NCT03626714 (6) [back to overview]Mean Blood Concentration-time Curve - Tmax
NCT03645057 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change in Family Dermatology Life Quality Index
NCT03645057 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change in Children's PROMIS Pediatric Itch Short-Form
NCT03645057 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change in Children's Eczema Area & Severity Index (EASI)
NCT03645057 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index
NCT03645057 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change in Caregiver Burden Inventory
NCT03645057 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change in PROMIS Anxiety-children (Adaptive Test)
NCT03645057 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change in PROMIS Pain Interference-Children (Adaptive Test)
NCT03645057 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change in PROMIS Depressive Symptoms-Pediatric (Adaptive Test)
NCT03645057 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change in Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire
NCT03699631 (1) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With GVHD/Relapse-free (GRFS) Survival
NCT03713645 (8) [back to overview]Tacrolimus Dose at Therapeutic Tacrolimus Concentration
NCT03713645 (8) [back to overview]Tacrolimus Dose During Study Period
NCT03713645 (8) [back to overview]Weight-based Tacrolimus Dose During Study Period
NCT03713645 (8) [back to overview]Weight Based Tacrolimus Dose at Therapeutic Concentration
NCT03713645 (8) [back to overview]Time to First Therapeutic Tacrolimus Trough Concentration From Initiation of Tacrolimus Extended Release Measured in Days
NCT03713645 (8) [back to overview]Tacrolimus Trough Level During Study Period
NCT03713645 (8) [back to overview]Average Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Within 30 Days
NCT03713645 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With no Impact of Tremor on Quality of Life
NCT03734601 (6) [back to overview]Graft vs Host Disease (GvHD)
NCT03734601 (6) [back to overview]Full-dose Donor Chimerism (FDC) at Day 28 Following TLI/ATG/TBI Conditioning.
NCT03734601 (6) [back to overview]Disease Progression
NCT03734601 (6) [back to overview]Non-relapse Mortality (NRM)
NCT03734601 (6) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) at 1 Year
NCT03734601 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03762473 (5) [back to overview]Evaluate the Effect of Envarsus Conversion as Evidenced by a 15% Decrease in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) and Proteinuria.
NCT03762473 (5) [back to overview]Participants Will Experience Less BK Infection Episodes Based on Nephropathy Results.
NCT03762473 (5) [back to overview]Participants Will Experience Less BK Infection Episodes Based on Viremia Results.
NCT03762473 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Viruria >500 Copies
NCT03762473 (5) [back to overview]Evaluate the Safety of Envarsus Treatment as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.
NCT03816332 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Overall Survival After Receiving Nivolumab, Tacrolimus, and Prednisone
NCT03816332 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Progression-free Survival After Receiving Nivolumab, Tacrolimus, and Prednisone
NCT03816332 (4) [back to overview]Number (and Percentage) of Outcome Responses After Receiving Nivolumab, Tacrolimus, and Prednisone
NCT03816332 (4) [back to overview]Rate of Allograft Loss After Receiving Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Tacrolimus, and Prednisone
NCT03864926 (3) [back to overview]Number of Days Needed to Recover From Delayed Graft Function (DGF)
NCT03864926 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Related Adverse Events
NCT03864926 (3) [back to overview]Number of Tacrolimus or Envarsus XR Dose Adjustments Required During the Period of DGF
NCT04002115 (7) [back to overview]Severity of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)
NCT04002115 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Chronic GVHD
NCT04002115 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)
NCT04002115 (7) [back to overview]Neutrophil Engraftment
NCT04002115 (7) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate at Day 30 Post HSCT
NCT04002115 (7) [back to overview]Non-relapse Related Mortality
NCT04002115 (7) [back to overview]Severity of Chronic GVHD
NCT04041219 (2) [back to overview]Median Sublingual (SL) to Oral (PO) Ratio
NCT04041219 (2) [back to overview]Median Tacrolimus Sublingual Trough Level
NCT04095858 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT04095858 (5) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS)
NCT04095858 (5) [back to overview]180 Day Grade III-IV aGVHD-free and Relapse-free Survival (aGVHD RFS)
NCT04095858 (5) [back to overview]180 Day Grade II-IV aGFS
NCT04095858 (5) [back to overview]180 Day Grade III-IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD)-Free Survival (aGFS)
NCT04205240 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade II-IV Acute Graft-versus Host Disease (GvHD (aGVHD)
NCT04205240 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With a Partial Response
NCT04339101 (3) [back to overview]Graft-versus-host Disease Free Relapse Free (GRFS) at 1 Year
NCT04339101 (3) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD
NCT04339101 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT04503616 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GvHD by Day +120
NCT04725682 (5) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration (AUC 72)
NCT04725682 (5) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration (AUC 0-t)
NCT04725682 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT04725682 (5) [back to overview]Time at Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)
NCT04725682 (5) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration (AUC Inf)

HbA1c Plasma Laboratory Values for Participants in the Extended Follow-up Study Phase

Seven participants from US sites were included in the extended follow-up. These participants were monitored yearly from year three post last transplantation (the original end of study follow-up) through August 30, 2010 (up to 9 years post first transplantation), at which point they were transferred to a new protocol (ITN040CT [NCT01309022]). Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a measure of the average plasma glucose concentration over prolonged periods of time. (Normal:<5.7%; pre-diabetes: 5.7% -6.4%; diabetes: 6.5% or higher) (NCT00014911)
Timeframe: First transplantation through August 30, 2010 (up to 9 years)

InterventionHbA1c Percentage (Mean)
Islet Transplantation6.2

[back to top]

Percent of Participants That Achieved Insulin Independence From First Transplant

Insulin independence: exogenous insulin not required and glycemic control is achieved as defined by maintaining 1) a blood glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level < 6.5% (Normal:<5.7%; pre-diabetes: 5.7% -6.4%; diabetes: 6.5% or higher),2) a blood glucose level after an overnight fast not exceeding 140 mg per deciliter (dL) more than three times in any week (Normal: 70 to 120 mg/dL), and 3)not exceeding a 2-hour postprandial blood glucose level of 180 mg/dL more than four times per week (Normal: <140mg/dL if <=50 years of age, <150 mg/dL for ages 50-60 years and <160 mg/dL for ages 60+) (NCT00014911)
Timeframe: First transplantation until end of study (up to six years post final transplantation)

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Islet Transplantation58

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Detectable Fasting Basal C-Peptide Levels

C-peptide is a substance that the pancreas releases into the bloodstream in equal amounts to insulin, thereby showing how much insulin the body is making. C-peptide secretion is used to measure the function of transplanted islets. Higher levels indicate better islet function. Detectable fasting basal levels of C-peptide secretion are >=0.3 ng/ml. (NCT00014911)
Timeframe: Two years post first transplantation

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Islet Transplantation70

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Partial Islet Function One Year Post Final Islet Transplantation.

Partial islet function definition: a fasting basal C-peptide level >= 0.3 ng/mL and a continuing need for insulin or suboptimal glycemic control (Note: C-peptide is a substance that the pancreas releases into the bloodstream in equal amounts to insulin, thereby showing how much insulin the body is making). Adequate glycemic control is defined by: 1) a blood HbA1c level <6.5%, 2) a blood glucose level after an overnight fast not exceeding 140 mg/dL more than three times in any week and, 3) a 2-hour postprandial blood glucose level not exceeding 180 mg/dL more than four times per week (NCT00014911)
Timeframe: One year post receipt of final islet transplantation

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Islet Transplantation28

[back to top]

Serum Creatinine Levels for Participants in the Extended Follow-up Study Phase

Seven participants from US sites were included in the extended follow-up. These participants were monitored yearly from year three post last transplantation (the original end of study follow-up) through August 30, 2010 (up to 9 years post first transplantation), at which point they were transferred to a new protocol (ITN040CT [NCT01309022]). Serum creatinine is a measure of renal function. Normal ranges are from 0.5 to 1.0 mg/dL for females and 0.7 to 1.2 mg/dL for males. (NCT00014911)
Timeframe: First transplantation through August 30, 2010 (up to 9 years)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Islet Transplantation0.9

[back to top]

Percent of Participants That Achieved Insulin Independence With Adequate Control of Blood Glucose Levels at One Year Post Final Islet Transplantation.

Insulin independence: exogenous insulin not required and glycemic control is achieved as defined by maintaining 1.) a blood glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level < 6.5% (Normal:<5.7%; pre-diabetes: 5.7% -6.4%; diabetes: 6.5% or higher),2) a blood glucose level after an overnight fast not exceeding 140 mg per deciliter (dL) more than three times in any week (Normal: 70 to 120 mg/dL), and 3)not exceeding a 2-hour postprandial blood glucose level of 180 mg/dL more than four times per week (Normal: <140mg/dL if <=50 years of age, <150 mg/dL for ages 50-60 years and <160 mg/dL for ages 60+) (NCT00014911)
Timeframe: One year status post participant receipt of final islet transplantation

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Insulin Independence at One YearInsulin Independence with One TransplantInsulin Independence with Two TransplantsInsulin Independence with Three Transplants
Islet Transplantation44141714

[back to top]

Nankivell Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

Nankivell GFR: patients with baseline GFR of 20.0 to 40.0 mL/min and patients with baseline GFR of greater than 40.0 mL/min. GFR is an index of kidney function. A higher value means better kidney function. (NCT00038948)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

InterventionmL/min (Mean)
SRL Conversion Strata 20.0-40.0 mL/Min24.56
CNI Continuation Strata 20.0-40.0 mL/Min27.24
SRL Conversion Strata >40.0 mL/Min59.04
CNI Continuation Strata >40.0 mL/Min57.73

[back to top]

First Occurrence of Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection, Graft Loss, or Death.

Number of patients who experienced for the first time either biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death by weeks 52 and 104. Assessed by individual endpoint and as composite endpoint (all combined). (NCT00038948)
Timeframe: 52 and 104 weeks

,,,
Interventionpatients (Number)
52 weeks - Acute rejection52 weeks - Graft loss52 weeks - Death52 weeks - Missing104 weeks - Acute rejection104 weeks - Graft loss104 weeks - Death104 weeks - Missing
CNI Continuation Strata >40.0 mL/Min33119838
CNI Continuation Strata 20.0-40.0 mL/Min03001902
SRL Conversion Strata >40.0 mL/Min836527121313
SRL Conversion Strata 20.0-40.0 mL/Min473051270

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival

"Disease-free survival (DFS) was measured as the interval from achievement of complete remission (CR) until relapse or death, regardless of cause; patients alive and in CR were censored at last follow-up. DFS was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method.~A complete remission (CR) was defined as recovery of morphologically normal bone marrow and blood counts (i.e., neutrophils >= 1.5 x 10^9/L and platelets > 100 x 10^9/L) and no circulating leukemic blasts or evidence of extramedullary leukemia and persisting for at least one month." (NCT00039377)
Timeframe: Duration of treatment (up to 10 years)

Interventionyears (Median)
Entire Cohort1.7

[back to top]

5 Year Overall Survival for Autologous & Allogeneic Transplant Groups

Percentage of patients who were alive at 5 years. The 5-year progression free survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00039377)
Timeframe: 5 years from registration

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Patients With HLA-matched Sibling Donor53
Patients Without HLA-matched Sibling Donors51

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved a BCR-ABL Response at 12 Months

"BCR-ABL response is defined in two ways: complete molecular response (CMR) and major molecular response (MMR).~Complete Molecular Response is defined as a Bcr-Abl (a fusion of gene of Bcr and ABl genes) ratio ≤0.0032% on the International Scale Bcr = breakpoint cluster gene Abl = abelson proto-oncogene~MMR is defined as Bcr-Abl (A fusion gene of the breakpoint cluster region [Bcr] gene and Abelson proto-oncogene [Abl] genes) transcript ratio ≤0.1% (≥ 3 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from a standardized baseline), as detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR] (performed centrally)." (NCT00039377)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Molecular ResponseMajor Molecular Response
Entire Cohort94

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) as the interval from the on-study date until death. OS was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00039377)
Timeframe: Duration of study (up to 10 years)

Interventionyears (Median)
Entire Cohort3.6

[back to top]

5 Year Disease-free Survival for Autologous & Allogeneic Transplant Groups

Percentage of patients who achieved a complete remission (CR) and were alive and relapse free at 5 years. The 5-year progression free survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00039377)
Timeframe: 5 years from CR

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Patients With HLA-matched Sibling Donor46
Patients Without HLA-matched Sibling Donors47

[back to top]

Best Response Post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant EOCH (Etoposide, Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide, and Doxorubicin)

Response is defined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). RECIST criteria offer a simplified, conservative, extraction of imaging data for wide application in clinical trials. They presume that linear measures are an adequate substitute for 2-D (dimensional) methods and registers four response categories: Complete response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response (PR) is 30% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. Progressive disease (PD) is 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. Stable disease (SD) is small changes that do not meet above criteria. For the purposes of this study very good partial response ((VGPR) is >75% reduction in disease) was also employed. (NCT00043979)
Timeframe: up to 10 cycles of therapy or 280 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete Response (CR)Progressive Disease (PD)Partial Response (PR)Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)
Arm 2-Recipients2442

[back to top]

Toxicity

Here is the number of participants with adverse events. For a detailed list of adverse events see the adverse event module. (NCT00043979)
Timeframe: 16.5 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Arm 2-Recipients30

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Engraftment

Engraftment is defined as rapid conversion to complete donor chimerism and is assessed by blood counts and chimerism, >95% donor engraftment at day 100 in >75% of patients. (NCT00043979)
Timeframe: 100 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Arm 2-Recipients23

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Graft Versus Tumor Effect (GVT)

GVT is defined as tumor response after day 42 post-transplantation without cytotoxic therapy. (NCT00043979)
Timeframe: up to day 100

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 2-Recipients0

[back to top]

Median Time to Reach Absolute Neutrophil Count of 500/mm(3)

Days for participants to achieve a neutrophil count of 500/mm(3). (NCT00043979)
Timeframe: up to 12 days

InterventionDays (Median)
Arm 2-Recipients9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD

Acute GVHD as by Modified Glucksberg Criteria occurring before day 100. Chronic GVHD as per Seattle criteria occurring after day 100. (NCT00043979)
Timeframe: up to 5 years or death

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
acute GVHDchronic GVHD
Recipients -Cyclosporine GVHD Prophylaxis1212
Recipients -Tacrolimus/Sirolimus GVHD Prophylaxis55

[back to top]

Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Reconstitution

The median CD4 count with a range of 85-1565 (absolute count) was used to determine recovery and were considered recovered if in this range. The CD4 count was established by flow cytometry testing. (NCT00043979)
Timeframe: Day +28-42

Interventionmm(3) (Median)
Arm 2-Recipients284

[back to top]

Number of Participants to Complete Conversion to >95% Donor Chimerism

Participants who tolerated the transplantation regimen and accepted >95% of the donors blood, marrow, and/or tissue. (NCT00043979)
Timeframe: up to 30 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day +14Day +28
Arm 2-Recipients2323

[back to top]

Median Progression Free Survival

Progression free survival was based on the time from on-study date until progression or last follow-up. (NCT00043979)
Timeframe: up to 77 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm 2-Recipients15.9

[back to top]

Two Year Survival Rate for Patients Undergoing Allo-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Participants who are alive at two years following Allo-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant. (NCT00043979)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
From date of enrollmentFrom date of transplantation
Arm 2-Recipients39.134.8

[back to top]

Post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) Radiotherapy

Site of radiotherapy (high energy radiation) and/or toxicity experienced by the participants post HSCT radiotherapy. Grading was preformed using the Modified Glucksberg Criteria. (NCT00043979)
Timeframe: up to 6 cycles or 168 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Chest wall; G2 skinAbdomen; G4 GIPancreas; G4 LFTs, G4 pancreatitisPleura, mediastinum; G4 LFTs, G2 mucositisChest wall; G4 skin, G3 mucositisSpine, skull; G2 nausea+vomiting, G2 fatiguePelvis; G4 enteritisPulmonary (cyberknife)Brain; B3 mucositisWhole lung; G3 mucositis, G3 skin, G5 lungL arm, R shoulder, B/L femur
Arm 2-Recipients11111111111

[back to top]

Median Survival From Date of Progression

Median survival from date of progression is based on the time from on-study date until progression or last follow-up. (NCT00043979)
Timeframe: up to 77 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Participants who did not receive a transplant(n=7)Participants who received a transplant (n=23)
Arm 2-Recipients3.319.1

[back to top]

Median Time to Reach a Platelet Count of 50,000/mm(3)

Days for participants to achieve a platelet count of 50,000/mm(3). (NCT00043979)
Timeframe: up to 43 days

InterventionDays (Median)
Arm 2-Recipients15

[back to top]

Early Post Transplantation Relapse

Participants who experienced recurrence or progression of disease following transplant. (NCT00043979)
Timeframe: up to 300 days

InterventionDays (Median)
Arm 2-Recipients100

[back to top]

Donor Engraftment (Chimerism)

Defined by the detection of at least 50% donor derived T-cells (CD3+), as a proportion of the total T-cell population (NCT00049504)
Timeframe: At day +84 after transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Nonmyeloablative HSCT)34

[back to top]

Incidence of Grades III-IV Acute GVHD

Grade III GVHD represents moderate severity. Grade IV GVHD represents extreme severity (NCT00049504)
Timeframe: At any time within 200 days after transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Nonmyeloablative HSCT)4

[back to top] [back to top]

OS

Overall survival with events defined as death due to any cause and censored patients are alive as of 1 year post HSC infusion (NCT00053989)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
All Patients44

[back to top]

Day 100 TRM

treatment related mortality within 100 days from hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) infusion on day 0 (NCT00053989)
Timeframe: from start or conditioning (day -6 or -5) through day +100 after HSC infusion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Patients4

[back to top]

PFS

Progression free survival defined as time from HSC infusion (day 0) until progression of disease or death due to any cause. Patients are censored if alive without disease progression through 1 year after HSC infusion (NCT00053989)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
All Patients27

[back to top]

Acute GvHD

overall grade II-IV acute GvHD (NCT00053989)
Timeframe: Day +100

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Patients16

[back to top]

2-year Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the time of transplant to death from any cause or censored at last follow-up. Survival data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00058825)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stem Cell Transplant33.3

[back to top]

Median Time to Engraftment With the Isolex/CLINIMACs System

Engraftment was defined as the day of absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) exceeded 0.5 X 10^9/L on the first of 3 days. (NCT00058825)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Isolex12
CLINIMACs12

[back to top]

Time in Days to ANC Engraftment

Engraftment was defined as the day of absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) exceeded 0.5 X 10^9/L on the first of 3 days. (NCT00058825)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Stem Cell Transplant12

[back to top] [back to top]

Acute Graft Versus Host Disease

Number of patients with Acute Graft Versus Host Disease within 100 days post-transplant (NCT00058825)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 0Grade IGrade IIGrade IIIGrade IV
Stem Cell Transplant260010

[back to top]

Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease

Number of patients with Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease within 1 year post-transplant (NCT00058825)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
YesNo
Stem Cell Transplant126

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Engrafted With the Isolex/CLINIMACs System

Engraftment was defined as the day of absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) exceeded 0.5 X 10^9/L on the first of 3 days. (NCT00058825)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Isolex15
CLINIMACs7

[back to top]

2-year Relapse-free Survival

Relapse-free survival (RFS) was calculated from the time of transplant to the date of relapse, death, or last follow-up, whichever occurred first. Survival data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00058825)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stem Cell Transplant25.9

[back to top]

Donor Chimerism Engraftment of Greater Than 50%

Number of patients that engrafted who showed a chimerism (donor cells) of greater than 50% in the first 30 days (NCT00058825)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
YesNo
Stem Cell Transplant202

[back to top]

Graft Survival at One Year

"Graft survival defined as any participant who did not meet the criteria for graft loss, where graft loss is defined as any re-transplant, permanent return to dialysis (> 30 days), patient death, or participant whose outcome at one year was unknown.~Participants were only counted once regardless of how many criteria were met." (NCT00064701)
Timeframe: One year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus91.5
Tacrolimus Modified Release95.3
Cyclosporine95.3

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Graft Survival at the End of the Study

"Graft survival was defined as any participant who did not meet the definition of graft loss, where graft loss was any retransplant or the permanent return to dialysis (more than 30 days) or patient death.~Graft survival was censored at the time of last follow-up contact." (NCT00064701)
Timeframe: End of study (maximum time on study was 1,941 days).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus82.7
Tacrolimus Modified Release84.7
Cyclosporine83.9

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Patient Survival at the End of the Study

Patient survival was defined as any participant who was alive at the end of the study. Patient survival was censored at the time of last follow-up contact. (NCT00064701)
Timeframe: End of study (maximum time on study was 1,941 days).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus91.2
Tacrolimus Modified Release93.2
Cyclosporine91.7

[back to top]

Severity of Acute Rejection

"Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist. Biopsies were graded according to the 1997 Banff criteria:~Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade IA: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; Grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; Grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis in at least 1 arterial cross section Grade IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area lost in at least 1 arterial cross section; Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel." (NCT00064701)
Timeframe: one year

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade I-AGrade I-BGrade II-AGrade II-BGrade III
Cyclosporine146612
Tacrolimus84310
Tacrolimus Modified Release113611

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Treated Acute Rejection Episodes

A clinically treated acute rejection episode was any biopsy-confirmed or suspected rejection episode that was treated with immunosuppressive therapy. (NCT00064701)
Timeframe: one year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus25
Tacrolimus Modified Release39
Cyclosporine45

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Multiple Rejection Episodes

This analysis includes rejection episodes that were either confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist or were clinically treated. (NCT00064701)
Timeframe: one year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus2
Tacrolimus Modified Release4
Cyclosporine8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Requiring Anti-lymphocyte Antibody Therapy for Treatment of Rejection

"Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist. Participants with histologically-proven Banff Grade II or III rejection or participants with steroid-resistant rejection were treated with anti-lymphocyte antibody treatment according to institutional practice.~Biopsies were graded according to the 1997 Banff criteria:~Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel." (NCT00064701)
Timeframe: one year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus6
Tacrolimus Modified Release8
Cyclosporine18

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Crossed Over Due to Treatment Failure

Participants were allowed to cross over to an alternative primary immunosuppressive regimen (either to the tacrolimus or cyclosporine treatment arms) to address an adverse event which led to randomized study drug discontinuation or in the case of severe or refractory rejection. Crossover to the modified release tacrolimus treatment arm was not permitted. (NCT00064701)
Timeframe: one year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus6
Tacrolimus Modified Release10
Cyclosporine39

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Failure

Treatment failure was defined as the discontinuation of randomized study drug for any reason. Participants who met the definition of treatment failure were to be followed throughout the 12-month treatment period. (NCT00064701)
Timeframe: one year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus33
Tacrolimus Modified Release31
Cyclosporine61

[back to top]

Patient Survival at One Year

Patient survival is defined as any participant who is known to be alive one year after the skin closure date. Participants who died or whose outcome was unknown at one year were considered to be non-survivors. (NCT00064701)
Timeframe: One year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus93.9
Tacrolimus Modified Release97.2
Cyclosporine97.2

[back to top]

Time to First Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection Episode

"Time to first biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episode defined as the number of days from skin closure (Day 0) to the date of biopsy. Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist and graded according to the 1997 Banff criteria:~Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel.~Acute rejection is defined as a grade ≥ I." (NCT00064701)
Timeframe: one year

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus156.00
Tacrolimus Modified Release11.00
Cyclosporine52.00

[back to top]

Change From Month 1 in Creatinine Clearance at Month 6 and Month 12

Renal function was assessed by creatinine clearance, calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. (NCT00064701)
Timeframe: Month 1, Month 6, and Month 12

,,
InterventionmL/min (Mean)
At 6 months [N=184, 184, 167]At 12 months [N=173, 182, 145]
Cyclosporine-1.79-0.25
Tacrolimus0.831.50
Tacrolimus Modified Release0.472.62

[back to top]

Change From Month 1 in Serum Creatinine at Month 6 and Month 12

Renal function was assessed by the change from Month 1 in serum creatinine six months and 12 months after transplant. (NCT00064701)
Timeframe: Month 1, Month 6, and Month 12

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
At 6 months [N=184, 184, 169]At 12 months [N=173, 182, 147]
Cyclosporine-0.01-0.04
Tacrolimus-0.09-0.08
Tacrolimus Modified Release-0.08-0.14

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure

"Efficacy failure is defined as any participant who died, experienced a graft failure (permanent return to dialysis [> 30 days] or retransplant), had a biopsy-confirmed (Banff Grade ≥ I) acute rejection (BCAR), or was lost to follow-up.~Biopsies were graded according to the 1997 Banff criteria:~Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel." (NCT00064701)
Timeframe: one year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus15.1
Tacrolimus Modified Release14.0
Cyclosporine17.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Acute Rejection at 6 and 12 Months

"Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist. Biopsies were graded according to the 1997 Banff criteria:~Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel.~Acute rejection is defined as a grade ≥ I." (NCT00064701)
Timeframe: Six months and 12 months

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
At 6 MonthsAt 12 Months
Cyclosporine11.813.7
Tacrolimus3.87.5
Tacrolimus Modified Release7.910.3

[back to top]

Non-relapse Mortality (NRM)

Percentage of patients who died due to causes other than relapse (NCT00070135)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Treatment (Fludarabine, Busulfan, Allogeneic PBSC)16

[back to top]

2 Year Disease Free Survival In Unrelated Donor Recipient Group

"Percentage of participants who were alive and relapse free at 2 years for patients who were matched with an unrelated donor for transplant. The 2 year disease free survival, with 95% confidence interval, was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method.~A relapse is defined as any of the following:~Reappearance of leukemia blasts cells in peripheral blood~>5% blasts in the marrow, not attributable to another cause (e.g., bone marrow regeneration)~If there are no circulating blasts, but the marrow contains 5-20% blasts, a repeat bone marrow ≥ 1 week later with >5% blasts is necessary to meet the criteria for relapse~The development of extramedullary leukemia or leukemic cells in the cerebral spinal fluid" (NCT00070135)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Fludarabine, Busulfan, Allogeneic PBSC)40

[back to top]

2 Year DFS for All Patients

Percentage of participants who were alive and relapse free at 2 years for all patients. The 2 year disease free survival, with 95% confidence interval, was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00070135)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Fludarabine, Busulfan, Allogeneic PBSC)42

[back to top]

The Rate of Significant Drug-associated Complications.

(NCT00076570)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sirolimus Group0
Tacrolimus Group0

[back to top]

The Rate of Allograft Rejection

(NCT00076570)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sirolimus Group0
Tacrolimus Group0

[back to top]

Number of Sirolimus Associated Adverse Events, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status

(NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to end of study (up to four years post-transplant)

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)2
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)7

[back to top]

Number of Side Effects of Conventional Immunosuppression, Stratified by Withdrawal Status

Side effects of conventional immunosuppression include increased body weight and hypertension (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to end of study (up to four years post-transplant)

Interventionside effects (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)2
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)6

[back to top]

Number of Severe Acute Rejections Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status

"Participants who experienced severe acute rejections[1] during study~Severe acute rejection is defined as that which requires treatment with anti-lymphocyte antibody or is histologically evaluated as Type IIA or greater using the Banff 1997 criteria[2]~Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to severe acute rejection (up to four years post-transplantation)

InterventionRejection Events (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Graft Loss Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status

"Participants who experienced graft loss[1] during study~[1]Graft loss is defined as the institution of chronic dialysis (at least 6 consecutive weeks, excluding participants with delayed graft function), transplant nephrectomy, or retransplantation" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to Graft Loss (up to four years post-transplantation)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Requiring Anti-lymphocyte Therapy for an Acute Rejection, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status

"Participants who experienced acute rejection[1] during study which required anti-lymphocyte (OKT3, ATG) therapy~1] Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-prove rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff[2] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine.~[2] Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to acute rejection (up to four years post-transplantation)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0

[back to top]

Number of Deaths Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status

Participants who died during the study, all cause(s) (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to Death (up to four years post-transplant)

Interventiondeaths (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0

[back to top]

Number of Alemtuzumab Associated Adverse Events, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status

(NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to end of study (up to four years post-transplant)

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)2
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)8

[back to top]

Number of Acute Rejections in All Enrolled Participants

"Number of acute rejections[1] in all enrolled subjects from the time of transplantation to the end of the trial (four years post-transplant)~Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-proven rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff[2] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine.~Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Four years post-transplant

InterventionRejection Events (Number)
Alemtuzumab1

[back to top]

Number of Acute Rejections in All Enrolled Participants Following Sirolimus Withdrawal

"Following sirolimus withdrawal, the number of acute rejections[1] in all enrolled participants~1] Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-proven rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff[2] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine.~[2] Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to end of study (up to four years post-transplant)

InterventionRejection Events (Number)
Alemtuzumab0

[back to top]

Change in Renal Function as Measured by Serum Creatinine, Stratified by Withdrawal Status

Mean change from transplantation to Month 48 in serum creatinine. Normal serum creatinine range is from 0.7 - 1.4 mg/dL. In a transplant population, starting serum creatinine is higher than normal range. A negative change indicates better renal function (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to end of study (up to four years post-transplant)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)-4.2
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)-5.4

[back to top]

Number of Acute Rejections Between Initiation of Sirolimus Withdrawal and End of Study

"Acute rejections[1] between initiation of sirolimus withdrawal and end of study~1] Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-proven rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff[2] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine.~[2] Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Initiation of sirolimus to end of study (up to four years post-transplant)

InterventionRejection Events (Number)
Alemtuzumab0

[back to top]

Time From Transplantation to Acute Rejection in Participants for Whom Sirolimus Withdrawal Was Not Initiated

"Time (days) to acute rejection[1] for participants where sirolimus was not initiated~1] Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-proven rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff[2] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine.~[2] Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to acute rejection (up to four years post-transplantation)

InterventionDays (Number)
Alemtuzumab274

[back to top]

Time From Transplantation to Acute Rejection in Participants for Whom Acute Rejection Occurred During the 1 Year Post-transplant Period

"Time (days) to acute rejection[1] for participants occurring during the year following transplantation~1] Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-proven rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff[2] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine.~[2] Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to acute rejection (up to one year post-transplant)

InterventionDays (Number)
Alemtuzumab274

[back to top]

Number of Tacrolimus Associated Adverse Events, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status

(NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to end of study (up to four years post-transplant)

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)2

[back to top]

Patient and Graft Survival

Endpoint was a composite assessment of patient and graft survival. Patients categorized as graft survival or graft loss. Graft loss defined as pure graft loss (requiring retransplant) or death (with a functioning graft), if the event occurred in the first 12 months after randomization. Patients with missing graft data were counted as graft losses. (NCT00086346)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
Interventionpatients (Number)
Graft survivalGraft loss (total)Graft loss: Pure (with retransplant)Graft loss: DeathGraft loss: Incomplete data
Calcineurin Inhibitors (CNI) Continuation20212039
Sirolimus (SRL) Conversion3672601313

[back to top]

Mean Serum Creatinine

Observed mean values for serum creatinine. (NCT00086346)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionµmol/L (Mean)
Sirolimus (SRL) Conversion119.0
Calcineurin Inhibitors (CNI) Continuation122.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Adjusted Mean in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

GFR is an index of kidney function. GFR was calculated using Cockcroft-Gault method. A normal GFR is >90 mL/min, higher values indicate better function. Change=adjusted mean of 12 months minus baseline. Mean adjusted for baseline GFR, with antimetabolite therapy status and hepatitis C status as fixed effects. (NCT00086346)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months

InterventionmL/min (Mean)
Sirolimus (SRL) Conversion-4.45
Calcineurin Inhibitors (CNI) Continuation-3.07

[back to top]

Number of Patients With a Biopsy Confirmed Acute Rejection

Overall event rate is determined as yes or no. (NCT00086346)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
Interventionpatients (Number)
YesNo
Calcineurin Inhibitors (CNI) Continuation13201
Sirolimus (SRL) Conversion46347

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade III/IV GVHD

"Number of patients who developed acute/chronic GVHD post-transplant. aGVHD Stages~Skin:~a maculopapular eruption involving < 25% BSA a maculopapular eruption involving 25 - 50% BSA generalized erythroderma generalized erythroderma with bullous formation and often with desquamation~Liver:~bilirubin 2.0 - 3.0 mg/100 mL bilirubin 3 - 5.9 mg/100 mL bilirubin 6 - 14.9 mg/100 mL bilirubin > 15 mg/100 mL~Gut:~Diarrhea is graded 1 - 4 in severity. Nausea and vomiting and/or anorexia caused by GVHD is assigned as 1 in severity. The severity of gut involvement is assigned to the most severe involvement noted. Patients with visible bloody diarrhea are at least stage 2 gut and grade 3 overall.~aGVHD Grades Grade III: Stage 2 - 4 gut involvement and/or stage 2 - 4 liver involvement Grade IV: Pattern and severity of GVHD similar to grade 3 with extreme constitutional symptoms or death" (NCT00089011)
Timeframe: Day 180 post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With Fludarabine and TBI)2
Arm II (Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With TBI)4

[back to top] [back to top]

Incidence of Chronic Extensive GVHD

Number of patients who developed chronic extensive GVHD post-transplant. The diagnosis of chronic GVHD requires at least one manifestation that is distinctive for chronic GVHD as opposed to acute GVHD. In all cases, infection and others causes must be ruled out in the differential diagnosis of chronic GVHD. (NCT00089011)
Timeframe: Day 180 post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With Fludarabine and TBI)15
Arm II (Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With TBI)6

[back to top]

Rates of Disease Progression

"Relapse/Progression criteria:~CML New cytogenetic abnormality and/or development of accelerated phase or blast crisis. The criteria for accelerated phase will be defined as unexplained fever >38.3°C, new clonal cytogenetic abnormalities in addition to a single Ph-positive chromosome, marrow blasts and promyelocytes >20%.~CMML, AML, ALL >30% BM blasts w/ deteriorating performance status, or worsening of anemia, neutropenia, or thrombocytopenia.~CLL ≥1 of: Physical exam/imaging studies ≥50% increase or new, circulating lymphocytes by morphology and/or flow cytometry ≥50% increase, and lymph node biopsy w/ Richter's transformation.~NHL >25% increase in the sum of the products of the perpendicular diameters of marker lesions, or the appearance of new lesions.~MM~≥100% increase of the serum myeloma protein from its lowest level, or reappearance of myeloma peaks that had disappeared w/ treatment; or definite increase in the size or number of plasmacytomas or lytic bone lesions." (NCT00089011)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With Fludarabine and TBI)41
Arm II (Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With TBI)33

[back to top]

Incidences of Graft Rejection

Number of patients who rejected their graft. Rejection is defined as the inability to detect or loss of detection of greater than 5% donor T cells (CD3+) as a proportion of the total T cell population, respectively, after nonmyeloablative HCT. (NCT00089011)
Timeframe: Day 180 post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With Fludarabine and TBI)0
Arm II (Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With TBI)0

[back to top]

Rate and Duration of Steroid Use for the Treatment of Chronic GVHD

Number of patients that received prednisone treatment of chronic GVHD, and number of days for which they received prednisone. (NCT00089011)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With Fludarabine and TBI)78
Arm II (Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With TBI)89

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Number of patients surviving post-transplant. (NCT00089011)
Timeframe: At 1 year after conditioning

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With Fludarabine and TBI)85
Arm II (Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With TBI)39

[back to top]

Incidences of Grades II-IV Acute GVHD

"Number of patients who developed acute/chronic GVHD post-transplant. aGVHD Stages~Skin:~a maculopapular eruption involving < 25% BSA a maculopapular eruption involving 25 - 50% BSA generalized erythroderma generalized erythroderma with bullous formation and often with desquamation~Liver:~bilirubin 2.0 - 3.0 mg/100 mL bilirubin 3 - 5.9 mg/100 mL bilirubin 6 - 14.9 mg/100 mL bilirubin > 15 mg/100 mL~Gut:~Diarrhea is graded 1 - 4 in severity. Nausea and vomiting and/or anorexia caused by GVHD is assigned as 1 in severity. The severity of gut involvement is assigned to the most severe involvement noted. Patients with visible bloody diarrhea are at least stage 2 gut and grade 3 overall.~aGVHD Grades Grade II: Stage 1 - 3 skin and/or stage 1 gut involvement and/or stage 1 liver involvement Grade III: Stage 2 - 4 gut involvement and/or stage 2 - 4 liver involvement Grade IV: Pattern and severity of GVHD similar to grade 3 with extreme constitutional symptoms or death" (NCT00089011)
Timeframe: Day 180 post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With Fludarabine and TBI)26
Arm II (Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With TBI)14

[back to top]

Lymphoma Progression-free Survival

(NCT00096460)
Timeframe: Three years post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)13
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Utilizing High-Dose Corticosteroids

"Number of patients utilizing high-dose corticosteroids (as a surrogate marker for reduction of acute GVHD), estimated by cumulative incidence methods.~Cumulative incidence methods are the standard way to estimate incidence of an endpoint in the presence of competing risks and censoring (ref) Here is the reference. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE: Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Statistics in Medicine 18:695-706, 1999. PMID 10204198" (NCT00105001)
Timeframe: 150 days after transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus)38
Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule)35
Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus)22

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grades II-IV Acute GVHD

"Number of patients with grades II-IV acute GVHD~aGVHD Stages~Skin:~a maculopapular eruption involving < 25% BSA~a maculopapular eruption involving 25 - 50% BSA~generalized erythroderma~generalized erythroderma w/ bullous formation and often w/ desquamation~Liver:~bilirubin 2.0 - 3.0 mg/100 mL~bilirubin 3 - 5.9 mg/100 mL~bilirubin 6 - 14.9 mg/100 mL~bilirubin > 15 mg/100 mL~Gut:~Diarrhea is graded 1 - 4 in severity. Nausea and vomiting and/or anorexia caused by GVHD is assigned as 1 in severity. The severity of gut involvement is assigned to the most severe involvement noted. Patients w/ visible bloody diarrhea are at least stage 2 gut and grade 3 overall.~aGVHD Grades Grade II: Stage 1 - 2 skin w/ no gut/liver involvement Grade III: Stage 2 - 4 gut involvement and/or stage 2 - 4 liver involvement Grade IV: Pattern and severity of GVHD similar to grade 3 w/ extreme constitutional symptoms or death" (NCT00105001)
Timeframe: 150 days after transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus)44
Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule)34
Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus)32

[back to top]

Number of Non-Relapse Mortalities

"Percentage of NRM as estimated by cumulative incidence methods with competing risks.~Cumulative incidence methods are the standard way to estimate incidence of an endpoint in the presence of competing risks and censoring (ref) Here is the reference. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE: Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Statistics in Medicine 18:695-706, 1999. PMID 10204198" (NCT00105001)
Timeframe: 200 days after transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus)3
Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule)6
Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus)2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Surviving Overall

"Number of patients surviving, estimated by cumulative incidence methods~Cumulative incidence methods are the standard way to estimate incidence of an endpoint in the presence of competing risks and censoring (ref) Here is the reference. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE: Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Statistics in Medicine 18:695-706, 1999. PMID 10204198" (NCT00105001)
Timeframe: 1 Year post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus)48
Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule)47
Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus)40

[back to top]

Number of Participants Surviving Without Progression

"Number of patients with progression-free survival, estimated by cumulative incidence methods~Cumulative incidence methods are the standard way to estimate incidence of an endpoint in the presence of competing risks and censoring (ref) Here is the reference. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE: Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Statistics in Medicine 18:695-706, 1999. PMID 10204198" (NCT00105001)
Timeframe: 2 Years post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (MMF and Tacrolimus)28
Arm II (MMF and Tacrolimus Alternate Schedule)27
Arm III (MMF, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus)26

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Successfully Withdrawn From Immunosuppressants

This measure of tolerance induction includes the proportion of participants who qualify for immunosuppression withdrawal as determined by a review of individual clinical results by a protocol withdrawal committee. Successful withdrawal definition: participants who remain off immunosuppression for at least 8 weeks. (NCT00105235)
Timeframe: From 1 year post- transplantation until study completion or participant termination (participants followed up to 48 months post-transplant)

InterventionProportion of Participants (Number)
Alemtuzumab0.2

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Who Had Graft Loss or Death

Proportion of participants who had liver graft loss or who died or terminated from the study within 2 years of initiating immunosuppression withdrawal (NCT00105235)
Timeframe: Within 2 years after initiation of immunosuppression withdrawal

InterventionProportion of Participants (Number)
Alemtuzumab0

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Who Have Graft Loss or Death

Proportion of participants who had liver graft loss or who died within 1 year of undergoing transplantation. Note: Participants who discontinued treatment or terminated the study prior to 1 year post transplantation are considered treatment failures and are included in this measure. (NCT00105235)
Timeframe: Within 1 year of post-transplantation

InterventionProportion of Participants (Number)
Alemtuzumab0.22

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Successfully Withdrawn and Remain Off Immunosuppressants

This measure of tolerance induction includes the proportion of participants who qualify for immunosuppression withdrawal as determined by a review of individual clinical results by a protocol withdrawal committee, were successfully withdrawn from immunosuppressants, and remained off immunosuppressants at the time the trial ended. Successful withdrawal definition: participants who remain off immunosuppression for at least 8 weeks and do not restart immunosuppressant drugs after successful withdrawal. (NCT00105235)
Timeframe: From 1 year post- transplantation until study completion or participant termination (participants followed up to 48 months post-transplant)

InterventionProportion of Participants (Number)
Alemtuzumab0.1

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Erectile Function Domain Score Between Treated and Untreated Groups

Erectile function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, which consists of 15 questions. The erectile function domain score is calculated as a sum of scores from questions 1-5 and 15. A clinically meaningful difference is 5 points. The scores range from 1 to 30 points where a higher score indicates better erectile function. Normal erectile function is defined as greater than or equal to 24 points. (NCT00106392)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionErectile Function Domain Score (Median)
Tacrolimus18.0
Placebo23.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving Normal Spontaneous Erectile Function as Measured by the Erectile Function (EF) Domain Score

"Erectile function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, which consists of 15 questions. The erectile function domain score is calculated as a sum of scores from questions 1-5 and 15. A clinically meaningful difference is 5 points. The scores range from 1 to 30 points where a higher score indicates better erectile function. Normal erectile function is defined as greater than or equal to 24 points.~Percentages represent the proportions of participants who achieved normal erectile function at any time during the 24 months." (NCT00106392)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Tacrolimus45.3
Placebo54.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Considered Successful Responders to Impotence Medications

Patients were identified as successful responders if they answered affirmatively in the Patient Sexual Encounter Diary regarding successful sexual intercourse after using impotence medication. (NCT00106392)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Tacrolimus73.1
Placebo86.2

[back to top]

Time Taken to Achieve Normalization of the Erectile Function (EF) Domain Score

Erectile function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, which consists of 15 questions. The EF domain score is calculated as a sum of scores from questions 1-5 and 15. A clinically meaningful difference is 5 points. Scores range from 1-30 points where a higher score indicates better erectile function. Normal erectile function is defined as greater than or equal to 24 points.Time to achieve normalization of the EF domain score was calculated based on the date of the assessment during which the EF domain score was first greater than or equal to 24. (NCT00106392)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionDays (Median)
Tacrolimus104.5
Placebo180.0

[back to top]

Time to Achieve Response to Impotence Medications

Time to achieve response to impotence medication was calculated based on the date of the assessment during which the first successful response was recorded. The specific date of the actual response is not reflected; only that it occurred since the previous study visit. (NCT00106392)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionDays (Median)
Tacrolimus102.0
Placebo113.5

[back to top]

Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) and Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Load

(NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6 for CMV; Baseline, Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6 for EBV

,,
InterventionCopies/500 ng DNA (Mean)
EBV: Baseline (n= 20, 19, 19)EBV: Day 14 (n= 18, 19, 20)EBV: Month 1 (n= 20, 18, 18)EBV: Month 3 (n= 18, 18, 20)EBV: Month 6 (n= 15, 13, 18)CMV: Baseline (n= 20, 19, 19)CMV: Month 1 (n= 20, 18, 18)CMV: Month 3 (n= 18, 18, 20)CMV: Month 6 (n= 15, 13, 18)
CP-690,550 15 mg2.654.225.250.280.730.000.1555.6758.87
CP-690,550 30 mg0.260.580.500.2815.150.0043.504.062.38
Tacrolimus3.213.601.940.650.610.000.000.050.00

[back to top]

Fasting Serum Glucose Levels

(NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline: (n= 18, 19, 21)Day 14 (n= 19, 19, 20)Month 1 (n= 20, 18, 19)Month 3 (n= 18, 18, 20)Month 6 (n= 17, 14, 18)
CP-690,550 15 mg114.50131.58120.3593.56108.76
CP-690,550 30 mg102.6895.5885.2292.5694.57
Tacrolimus90.2999.8599.16101.0595.11

[back to top]

Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) of Lymphocyte Subsets

The absolute cell counts of cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8): Cytotoxic T-lymphocytes reactive with major histocompatibility complex-1 (MHC-I), CD19: B- Lymphocytes, CD56: natural killer cells were determined using FACS, a specialized type of flow cytometry which sorts a heterogeneous mixture based upon the specific light scattering and fluorescent characteristics of each cell. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
Interventioncells per microliter (cells/mcL) (Mean)
CD8: Baseline (n= 19, 19, 19)CD8: Day 14 (n= 19, 19, 19)CD8: Month 1 (n= 17, 18, 19)CD8: Month 3 (n= 18, 18, 20)CD8: Month 6 (n= 14, 11, 15)CD19: Baseline (n= 19, 19, 19)CD19: Day 14 (n= 19, 19, 19)CD19: Month 1 (n= 17, 18, 19)CD19: Month 3 (n= 18, 18, 20)CD19: Month 6 (n= 14, 11, 15)CD56: Baseline (n= 19, 19, 19)CD56: Day 14 (n= 19, 19, 19)CD56: Month 1 (n= 17, 18, 19)CD56: Month 3 (n= 18, 18, 20)CD56: Month 6 (n= 14, 11, 15)
CP-690,550 15 mg113.95449.84333.00212.94278.9369.74353.68282.41128.39156.50153.89163.11214.2985.56126.71
CP-690,550 30 mg114.05471.79354.39252.72201.0989.37486.84291.28217.67176.18127.84151.68101.1170.0036.27
Tacrolimus160.37401.68380.89261.35300.33111.32303.95343.58168.20188.80165.95212.00162.16144.15173.53

[back to top]

Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by Cockcroft-Gault

GFR: index of kidney function described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was measured directly or estimated using established formulas. GFR was calculated using Cockcroft-Gault equation. GFR by Cockcroft-Gault equation= body weight*(140 minus age in years) divided by (72*serum creatinine). For females, value obtained was multiplied by 0.85. A normal GFR is >90 mL/min, although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min indicated kidney failure. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
InterventionmL/min (Mean)
Day 14 (n= 19, 19, 20)Month 1 (n= 20, 18, 19)Month 3 (n= 18, 18, 20)Month 6 (n= 17, 14, 18)
CP-690,550 15 mg73.2480.7381.8482.17
CP-690,550 30 mg78.3781.8381.9979.99
Tacrolimus76.1479.9086.8691.89

[back to top]

Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation

GFR: index of kidney function described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was measured directly or estimated using established formulas. GFR was calculated using MDRD equation. GFR by MDRD equation= 170 * (serum creatinine) ^ (-0.999)*(age in years)^(-0.176)*(0.762 if female) * (1.18 if black)*(blood urea nitrogen concentration)^(-0.170)*(serum albumin concentration)^(0.318). Normal GFR is >90 mL/min/1.73 square meter (m^2), although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min indicated kidney failure. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Day 14 (n= 19, 19, 20)Month 1 (n= 20, 18, 19)Month 3 (n= 18, 18, 20)Month 6 (n= 17, 14, 18)
CP-690,550 15 mg60.6766.8264.5863.59
CP-690,550 30 mg57.9762.7062.0458.95
Tacrolimus56.7062.5566.4568.29

[back to top]

Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by Reciprocal of Serum Creatinine (1/sCr)

GFR is a measure of renal function. The reciprocal of serum creatinine is an estimate of GFR. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
Interventiondeciliter/mg (dL/mg) (Mean)
Day 14 (n= 19, 19, 20)Month 1 (n= 20, 18, 19)Month 3 (n= 18, 18, 20)Month 6 (n= 17, 14, 18)
CP-690,550 15 mg0.870.910.860.86
CP-690,550 30 mg0.750.790.770.73
Tacrolimus0.750.780.820.84

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HCRUQ)

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HCRUQ) was used to assess healthcare resources which included number of events such as physician and other health professional visits, number of treatments or diagnostic tests, number of hospitalizations, and number of emergency room visits. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6

,,
Interventionevents (Mean)
Physician visits: Baseline (n= 15, 16, 17)Physician visits: Month 6 (n= 10, 7, 10)Emergency room visits: Baseline (n= 16, 16, 17)Emergency room visits: Month 6 (n= 10, 7, 10)Diagnostic tests: Baseline (n= 14, 16, 17)Diagnostic tests: Month 6 (n= 10, 7, 10)Hospital visits: Baseline (n= 15, 16, 17)Hospital visits: Month 6 (n= 10, 7, 10)
CP-690,550 15 mg3.334.200.060.507.140.400.070.60
CP-690,550 30 mg4.317.290.190.145.880.860.000.43
Tacrolimus4.478.700.000.1016.064.200.000.10

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HCRUQ) - 5th Question

"Fifth question in the HCRUQ was Upon discharge from the hospital, did you return to your previous place of residence? and number of participants who responded yes or no to the question was reported." (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Month 6

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
YesNo
CP-690,550 15 mg72
CP-690,550 30 mg60
Tacrolimus61

[back to top]

Hematocrit Level

The hematocrit is recorded as the percentage of volume of red blood cells (RBCs) in a blood sample. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
Interventionpercentage of blood (Mean)
Baseline (n= 20, 20, 21)Day 14 (n= 18, 19, 18)Month 1 (n= 19, 18, 19)Month 3 (n= 19, 17, 20)Month 6 (n= 16, 14, 18)
CP-690,550 15 mg34.7537.7838.7438.5340.19
CP-690,550 30 mg33.3037.1638.2237.1237.86
Tacrolimus36.8637.1137.9539.5043.67

[back to top]

Hemoglobin Level

Hemoglobin is the protein molecule in red blood cells that carries oxygen from the lungs to the body's tissues and returns carbon dioxide from the tissues back to the lungs. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Baseline (n= 20, 20, 21)Day 14 (n= 19, 19, 18)Month 1 (n= 19, 18, 19)Month 3 (n= 19, 17, 20)Month 6 (n= 16, 14, 18)
CP-690,550 15 mg11.0411.8312.1612.3512.83
CP-690,550 30 mg10.6511.6812.2912.2012.41
Tacrolimus11.8411.9312.2012.9114.26

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease

(NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Month 3, 6

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 3 (n= 20, 19, 20)Month 6 (n= 19, 16, 20)
CP-690,550 15 mg02
CP-690,550 30 mg44
Tacrolimus00

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Discontinuation

(NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Month 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 1Month 2Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6
CP-690,550 15 mg011122
CP-690,550 30 mg111246
Tacrolimus001111

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Drug Usage

Lipid lowering agents, antihypertensive agents, oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) , anti-diabetic agents (ADA) and insulin drug usage was collected. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lipid Lowering: Baseline ( n= 20, 20, 21)Lipid Lowering: Day 14 (n= 20, 19, 21)Lipid Lowering: Month 1 (n= 20, 19, 21)Lipid Lowering: Month 3 (n= 20, 19, 20)Lipid Lowering: Month 6 (n= 18, 15, 20)Antihypertensive: Baseline ( n= 20, 20, 21)Antihypertensive: Day 14 (n= 20, 19, 21)Antihypertensive: Month 1 (n= 20, 19, 21)Antihypertensive: Month 3 (n= 20, 19, 20)Antihypertensive: Month 6 (n= 18, 15, 20)OHA, ADA, insulin usage: Baseline (n= 20, 20, 21)OHA, ADA, insulin usage: Day 14 (n= 20, 19, 21)OHA, ADA, insulin usage: Month 1 (n= 20, 19, 21)OHA, ADA, insulin usage: Month 3 (n= 20, 19, 20)OHA, ADA, insulin usage: Month 6 (n= 18, 15, 20)
CP-690,550 15 mg635810171515161495556
CP-690,550 30 mg94598181918181174443
Tacrolimus94457181516171653332

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Efficacy Failure

Efficacy failure was the first occurrence of BPAR, graft loss or participant's death. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Month 3, 6

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 3Month 6
CP-690,550 15 mg01
CP-690,550 30 mg44
Tacrolimus11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With First Biopsy Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (BPCAN)

BPCAN categorized as chronic allograft nephropathy as interpreted by the central blinded pathologist according to the Banff 97 working classification. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Month 3, 6

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 3Month 6
CP-690,550 15 mg00
CP-690,550 30 mg02
Tacrolimus00

[back to top]

Number of Participants With First Clinically Significant Infection

Clinically significant (Viral, Bacterial and Fungal) infection was defined as the presence of presumed or documented infection confirmed by culture, biopsy, genomic or serologic findings post-randomization and required hospitalization or anti-infective treatment, or otherwise deemed significant by the Investigator. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Month 3, 6

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 3Month 6
CP-690,550 15 mg26
CP-690,550 30 mg711
Tacrolimus35

[back to top]

Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Level

ALT is the enzyme found in the liver and it is measured to see if the liver is damaged or diseased. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
Interventionunit/liter (Mean)
Baseline (n= 19, 20, 21)Day 14 (n= 19, 19, 20)Month 1 (n= 20, 18, 19)Month 3 (n= 18, 18, 20)Month 6 (n= 17, 14, 18)
CP-690,550 15 mg24.8439.0528.9526.2831.06
CP-690,550 30 mg18.4570.6356.3936.2237.86
Tacrolimus18.3331.5021.3216.1023.28

[back to top]

Absolute Platelet Levels

(NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
Interventionplatelets*10^3/mm^3 (Mean)
Platelet: Baseline (n= 20, 20, 21)Platelet: Day 14 (n= 18, 19, 18)Platelet: Month 1 (n= 19,18, 19)Platelet: Month 3 (n= 19, 17, 20)Platelet: Month 6 (n= 16, 14, 18)
CP-690,550 15 mg186.75330.17249.68273.84272.19
CP-690,550 30 mg204.85367.84274.50307.00263.43
Tacrolimus195.19301.28276.79241.60225.17

[back to top]

36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2.0 (V2)

"SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as physical and mental component scores (CS). Total of 11 variables were analyzed (8 subscales, 2 composite subscales and Question 2 how would you rate your health in general now? (range 1= better, 5= worst). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning)." (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Bodily pain: Baseline (n= 16, 17, 17)Bodily pain: Month 6 (n=15, 10, 17)General health: Baseline (n= 15, 17, 17)General health: Month 6 (n= 15, 10, 17)Mental CS: Baseline (n= 15, 17, 17)Mental CS: Month 6 (n= 15, 10, 17)Mental health: Baseline (n= 16, 17, 17)Mental health: Month 6 (n= 15, 10, 17)Physical CS: Baseline (n= 15, 17, 17)Physical CS: Month 6 (n= 15, 10, 17)Physical functioning: Baseline (n= 16, 17, 17)Physical functioning: Month 6 (n= 15, 10, 17)Q2: Baseline (n= 16, 17, 17)Q2: Month 6 (n= 15, 10, 17)Role emotional: Baseline (n= 16, 17, 17)Role emotional: Month 6 (n= 15, 10, 17)Role physical: Baseline (n= 16, 17, 17)Role physical: Month 6 (n= 15, 10, 17)Social functioning: Baseline (n= 16, 17, 17)Social functioning: Month 6 (n= 15, 10, 17)Vitality: Baseline (n= 16, 17, 17)Vitality: Month 6 (n= 15, 10, 17)
CP-690,550 15 mg49.8954.7944.4849.7945.1852.3847.9052.8245.3750.6747.3047.493.251.0741.0648.3638.6451.1439.4651.0346.4356.25
CP-690,550 30 mg52.1555.0643.4049.5042.1556.1846.5354.5144.7149.7643.7948.403.181.1037.8152.7736.6950.7341.4553.5843.4658.65
Tacrolimus50.4657.5443.6553.8046.7351.6249.6851.1741.1153.8741.2050.722.591.4139.6449.7033.6650.5142.7350.7546.7758.52

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hypercholesterolemia

Hypercholesterolemia is a condition characterized by very high levels of cholesterol in the blood. Hypercholesterolemia was defined as a value of total serum cholesterol greater than 240 mg/dL. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline (n= 18, 19, 21)Day 14 (n= 19, 19, 20)Month 1 (n= 20, 18, 19)Month 3 (n= 18, 18, 20)Month 6 (n= 17, 14, 18)
CP-690,550 15 mg15854
CP-690,550 30 mg15653
Tacrolimus01221

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hypertriglyceridemia

Hypertriglyceridemia was defined as a value of triglycerides greater than 200 mg/dL. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline (n= 18, 19, 21)Day 14 (n= 19, 19, 20)Month 1 (n= 20, 18, 19)Month 3 (n= 18, 18, 20)Month 6 (n= 17, 14, 18)
CP-690,550 15 mg47755
CP-690,550 30 mg72555
Tacrolimus56321

[back to top]

Number of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus (NODM)

(NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Month 3, 6

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 3Month 6
CP-690,550 15 mg01
CP-690,550 30 mg00
Tacrolimus22

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Graft Loss

Graft loss was defined as graft nephrectomy, participant's death due to graft loss, re-transplantation, or return to dialysis for greater than or equal to (>=) 6 consecutive weeks. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Month 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CP-690,550 15 mg0
CP-690,550 30 mg0
Tacrolimus0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With First Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) at Month 6

BPAR categorized as acute rejection as interpreted by the central blinded pathologist according to the Banff 97 working classification. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CP-690,550 15 mg1
CP-690,550 30 mg4
Tacrolimus1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Died

(NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Month 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CP-690,550 15 mg0
CP-690,550 30 mg0
Tacrolimus0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With First Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) at Month 3

BPAR categorized as acute rejection as interpreted by the central blinded pathologist according to the Banff 97 working classification. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 3

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CP-690,550 15 mg0
CP-690,550 30 mg4
Tacrolimus1

[back to top]

Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by Nankivell Equation at Month 6

GFR: index of kidney function described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was measured directly or estimated using established formulas. GFR was calculated by creatinine clearance (CLcr) using Nankivell equation. CLcr by Nankivell equation= (6.7 per serum creatinine) plus (0.25*body weight) minus (0.5*serum urea) minus (100 per square height) plus (35 for male/25 for female). A normal GFR is >90 milliliter/minute (mL/min), although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min indicated kidney failure. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Month 6

InterventionmL/min (Mean)
CP-690,550 15 mg76.53
CP-690,550 30 mg71.50
Tacrolimus78.70

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Ordered Categorical Severity of First Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)

Ordered categorical severity of first BPAR was classified according to the Banff Classification. Grade IA: moderate tubulitis, grade IB: severe tubulitis, grade IIA: mild to moderate intimal arteritis, grade IIB: severe intimal arteritis, grade III: transmural arteritis. (Racusen et al: The Banff classification, 1999). (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Month 3, 6

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 3: IAMonth 3: IBMonth 3: IIAMonth 3: IIBMonth 3: IIIMonth 6: IAMonth 6: IBMonth 6: IIAMonth 6: IIBMonth 6: III
CP-690,550 15 mg0000000100
CP-690,550 30 mg1021010210
Tacrolimus0000000100

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Ordered Categorical Severity of First Biopsy Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (BPCAN)

Ordered categorical severity of first BPCAN was classified according to the Banff Classification. Grade I: mild, grade II: moderate and grade III: severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy/loss. (Racusen et al: The Banff classification, 1999). (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Month 3, 6

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 3: Any severityMonth 6: I
CP-690,550 15 mg00
CP-690,550 30 mg02
Tacrolimus00

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Rejection

Rejection was defined as first occurrence of BPAR, antibody mediated rejection, or suspicious for acute rejection. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Month 3, 6

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 3Month 6
CP-690,550 15 mg12
CP-690,550 30 mg44
Tacrolimus11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Failure

Treatment failure was defined as the first occurrence of BPAR, graft loss, participant's death or premature discontinuation of study medication for any reason. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Month 3, 6

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 3Month 6
CP-690,550 15 mg13
CP-690,550 30 mg79
Tacrolimus23

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 2 months after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 8 (2 months follow-up)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
CP-690,550 15 mg208
CP-690,550 30 mg1810
Tacrolimus216

[back to top]

Reticulocyte Count

Reticulocytes are slightly immature red blood cells in the blood. Reticulocyte counts are reported as cells*10^3 per cubic millimeter (cells*10^3/mm^3). (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
Interventioncells*10^3/mm^3 (Mean)
Baseline (n= 20, 20, 21)Day 14 (n= 18, 19, 18)Month 1 (n= 19, 18, 19)Month 3 (n= 19, 17, 20)Month 6 (n= 16, 14, 18)
CP-690,550 15 mg81.7593.0694.3783.0079.81
CP-690,550 30 mg68.50109.4787.3990.9473.07
Tacrolimus75.6781.61101.3785.9071.89

[back to top]

Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)

(NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
Interventionmillimeter of mercury (Mean)
Diastolic BP (DBP) : Baseline (n= 20, 20, 21)DBP: Day 2 (n= 19, 20, 20)DBP: Day 3 (n= 18, 19, 18)DBP: Day 14 (n= 20, 19, 20)DBP: Month 1 (n= 20, 18, 19)DBP: Month 3 (n= 19, 18, 21)DBP: Month 6 (n= 17, 13, 19)Systolic BP (SBP): Baseline (n= 20, 20, 21)SBP: Day 2 (n= 19, 20, 20)SBP: Day 3 (n= 18, 19, 18)SBP: Day 14 (n= 20, 19, 20)SBP: Month 1 (n= 20, 18, 19)SBP: Month 3 (n= 19, 18, 21)SBP: Month 6 (n= 17, 13, 19)
CP-690,550 15 mg77.1079.0582.5078.4578.9580.4277.24139.65141.16146.78135.90129.05140.32135.76
CP-690,550 30 mg75.2580.2088.0581.2180.8376.0683.23139.45143.55152.42141.16136.22133.44134.31
Tacrolimus76.5278.5082.6175.2076.3277.3379.00136.24136.05139.94121.45128.21124.00128.00

[back to top]

Total Serum Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Levels

(NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Total serum cholesterol: Baseline (n=18,19,21)Total serum cholesterol: Day 14 (n=19,19,20)Total serum cholesterol: Month 1 (n=20,18,19)Total serum cholesterol: Month 3 (n=18,18,20)Total serum cholesterol: Month 6 (n=17,14,18)LDL: Baseline (n=18,18,19)LDL: Day 14 (n=17,19,20)LDL: Month 1 (n=18,18,19)LDL: Month 3 (n=18,18,20)LDL: Month 6 (n=17,14,18)HDL: Baseline (n=18,19,21)HDL: Day 14 (n=19,19,20)HDL: Month 1 (n=20,18,19)HDL: Month 3 (n=18,18,20)HDL: Month 6 (n=17,14,18)
CP-690,550 15 mg168.78217.21245.20216.17207.8893.17114.71139.28118.72117.0043.8961.5875.6566.1759.53
CP-690,550 30 mg159.79208.05232.17203.00206.0787.78113.05130.50114.06119.0036.8464.1669.0656.1151.50
Tacrolimus166.86184.95202.89193.90195.5090.7498.70110.32111.50114.5046.0055.0562.1654.0555.00

[back to top]

Total White Blood Cells (WBC), Absolute Basophil, Absolute Eosinophil, Absolute Lymphocyte, Absolute Monocyte, Absolute Neutrophil

(NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
Interventioncells*10^3/mm^3 (Mean)
WBC: Baseline (n= 20, 20, 21)WBC: Day 14 (n= 18, 19, 18)WBC: Month 1 (n= 19,18, 19)WBC: Month 3 (n= 19, 17, 20)WBC: Month 6 (n= 16, 14, 18)Basophil: Baseline (n= 20, 20, 21)Basophil: Day 14 (n= 18, 19, 18)Basophil: Month 1 (n= 19,18, 19)Basophil: Month 3 (n= 19, 17, 20)Basophil: Month 6 (n= 16, 14, 18)Eosinophil: Baseline (n= 20, 20, 21)Eosinophil: Day 14 (n= 18, 19, 18)Eosinophil: Month 1 (n= 19,18, 19)Eosinophil: Month 3 (n= 19, 17, 20)Eosinophil: Month 6 (n= 16, 14, 18)Lymphocyte: Baseline (n= 20, 20, 21)Lymphocyte: Day 14 (n= 18, 19, 18)Lymphocyte: Month 1 (n= 19,18, 19)Lymphocyte: Month 3 (n= 19, 17, 20)Lymphocyte: Month 6 (n= 16, 14, 18)Monocyte: Baseline (n= 20, 20, 21)Monocyte: Day 14 (n= 18, 19, 18)Monocyte: Month 1 (n= 19,18, 19)Monocyte: Month 3 (n= 19, 17, 20)Monocyte: Month 6 (n= 16, 14, 18)Neutrophil: Baseline (n= 20, 20, 21)Neutrophil: Day 14 (n= 18, 19, 18)Neutrophil: Month 1 (n= 19,18, 19)Neutrophil: Month 3 (n= 19, 17, 20)Neutrophil: Month 6 (n= 16, 14, 18)
CP-690,550 15 mg12.7512.767.335.475.570.040.090.050.040.040.080.170.140.100.110.612.031.961.261.440.580.360.260.310.3111.6310.014.853.683.68
CP-690,550 30 mg11.0913.817.416.155.110.010.110.070.050.040.060.210.190.110.110.522.481.771.611.280.390.410.320.340.2510.0610.484.933.963.37
Tacrolimus11.8210.247.435.486.060.020.050.060.040.060.120.130.130.110.170.751.841.811.291.470.440.340.280.280.3410.377.785.053.723.94

[back to top]

Trough Levels of Tacrolimus (TAC)

(NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 14, Month 1, 3, 6

Interventionnanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Day 14 (n= 18)Month 1 (n= 18)Month 3 (n= 17)Month 6 (n= 15)
Tacrolimus11.179.118.828.33

[back to top]

BK Virus (BKV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Load

(NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6

,,
InterventionCopies/20 mcL plasma (Mean)
Baseline (n= 20, 19, 19)Month 1 (n= 20, 18, 18)Month 3 (n= 18, 18, 20)Month 6 (n= 15, 13, 18)
CP-690,550 15 mg0.000.000.005.07
CP-690,550 30 mg0.055.337.56189.85
Tacrolimus0.050.007.950.06

[back to top]

Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters

ECG parameters included PR interval, QT interval, corrected QT using Bazett's formula (QTcB) and QTc using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) interval, and QRS width. (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, 6

,,
Interventionmillisecond (Mean)
PR: Baseline (n= 15, 11, 17)PR: Month 3 (n= 19, 15, 18)PR: Month 6 (n= 16, 13, 19)QT: Baseline (n= 15, 12, 17)QT: Month 3 (n= 19, 16, 18)QT: Month 6 (n= 16, 13, 19)QTcB: Baseline (n= 15, 12, 17)QTcB: Month 3 (n= 19, 16, 18)QTcB: Month 6 (n= 16, 13, 19)QTcF: Baseline (n= 15, 12, 17)QTcF: Month 3 (n= 19, 16, 18)QTcF: Month 6 (n= 16, 13, 19)QRS: Baseline (n= 15, 12, 17)QRS: Month 3 (n= 19, 16, 18)QRS: Month 6 (n= 16, 13, 19)
CP-690,550 15 mg147.60156.37161.44412.40383.32401.44454.77417.25416.83439.77405.05411.4488.8087.7491.75
CP-690,550 30 mg141.82156.00163.23404.50378.88383.85447.37412.23410.48432.22400.60401.24102.67102.1390.31
Tacrolimus151.53150.17154.53393.88384.00384.68447.42409.81413.55428.57400.62403.4192.8288.2289.74

[back to top]

End-Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist-Transplantation Module (ESRD-SCL)

"ESRD-SCL:43-item disease specific self-administered questionnaire. Participants' rated questionAt the moment,how much do you suffer?for each item on 5 point scale,ranged (Ra) 0(not at all)to 4(extremely).Consisted of 6 subscales:cardiac and renal dysfunction;Ra 0-28,increased(In) growth of gum and hair;Ra 0-20,limited cognitive capacity;Ra 0-32,limited physical capacity;Ra 0-40,side effects (SEs) of corticosteroids;Ra 0-20,transplantation associated psychological distress(TAPD);Ra 0-32(higher scores=greater dysfunction for each subscale).Total score:0-172,higher scores=greater dysfunction." (NCT00106639)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cardiac and renal dysfunction:Baseline(n=13,15,17)Cardiac and renal dysfunction:Month 6(n=15,10,16)In growth of gum and hair: Baseline (n=14,15,17)In growth of gum and hair: Month 6 (n=15,9,16)Limited cognitive capacity: Baseline (n=14,15,17)Limited cognitive capacity: Month 6 (n=15,10,17))Limited physical capacity: Baseline (n=14,15,17)Limited physical capacity: Month 6 (n=15,10,16)SEs of corticosteroids: Baseline (n=13,15,17)SEs of corticosteroids: Month 6 (n=15,10,16)TAPD: Baseline (n=14,15,17)TAPD: Month 6 (n=15,10,16)
CP-690,550 15 mg0.600.260.190.170.680.550.650.410.580.651.100.69
CP-690,550 30 mg0.780.300.110.110.580.160.770.490.440.521.140.51
Tacrolimus0.670.220.130.100.780.350.620.380.680.240.970.58

[back to top]

Renal Function Abnormalities Based on Creatinine Clearance

"Increases in creatinine clearance usually indicates an improvement.~Change in creatinine clearance from month 1 was calculated.~Change from 1 month is calculated by month 36 - month 1." (NCT00113269)
Timeframe: 1 month and End of Study (36 months)

,,,
InterventionmL/s (Mean)
Month 1 (N= 65; 65; 162; 161)Month 36 (N= 48; 47; 125; 131)Change from Month 1 (N= 48; 46; 125; 129)
Alemtuzumab High-Risk Patients0.8820.9760.031
Alemtuzumab Low- Risk Patients0.9061.0110.080
Conventional High-Risk Patients0.8330.8620.039
Conventional Low-Risk Patients0.8911.0390.140

[back to top]

Patient Survival at 12 Months

"Patient survival is defined as not dead within 12 months after skin closure.~Kaplan Meier analysis was used to estimate percentage of patients with event. Patients with no event by the time of the scheduled visit or whose first event was after premature discontinuation of randomized study drug or tacrolimus were censored on the scheduled day of assessment, on the day of premature treatment discontinuation or last evaluation day, whichever came first." (NCT00113269)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionPercentage of Patients (Number)
Alemtuzumab High-Risk Patients98.6
Conventional High-Risk Patients96.9
Alemtuzumab Low- Risk Patients98.1
Conventional Low-Risk Patients98.7

[back to top]

Patient Incidence of Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection (BCAR) at 6 Months

"A BCAR is a suspected new rejection w/in 6 mos. of skin closure, confirmed by Banff Grade ≥1A assigned by a pathologist. The Banff 97 classification system is used for interpreting histology of allograft biopsies, including Mild (1A/1B), Moderate (2A/2B) & Severe (3).~Kaplan Meier analysis was used to estimate % of pts. w/event. Patients w/no event at time of scheduled visit or whose 1st event was after premature discontinuation of study drug/tacrolimus were censored on the scheduled day of a) assessment, b) of premature treatment discontinuation or c) last evaluation, whichever came 1st." (NCT00113269)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercentage of Patients (Number)
Alemtuzumab High-Risk Patients6.2
Conventional High-Risk Patients9.4
Alemtuzumab Low- Risk Patients1.9
Conventional Low-Risk Patients17.5

[back to top]

Time to First BCAR

"Time to first BCAR is defined as the number of days from skin closure to the first episode of BCAR.~End of Study was defined as the last day of evaluation and could have included bivariate assessments after 36 months." (NCT00113269)
Timeframe: End of Study (36 months)

InterventionDays (Median)
Alemtuzumab High-Risk Patients226
Conventional High-Risk Patients49
Alemtuzumab Low- Risk Patients469
Conventional Low-Risk Patients13

[back to top]

Overall Graft Survival

"Overall graft survival is defined as not having graft loss (re-transplant, return to dialysis for more than 30 consecutive days, or death) at any time following skin closure. Data is reported as the percentage of patients with Overall Graft Survival.~End of Study was defined as the last day of evaluation and could have included bivariate assessments after 36 months." (NCT00113269)
Timeframe: End of Study (36 months)

InterventionPercentage of Patients (Number)
Alemtuzumab High-Risk Patients88.6
Conventional High-Risk Patients82.6
Alemtuzumab Low- Risk Patients90.9
Conventional Low-Risk Patients91.2

[back to top]

Graft Survival at 12 Months

"Graft survival is defined as no graft loss (re-transplant, return to dialysis for more than 30 days or death) with 12 months of skin closure.~Kaplan Meier analysis was used to estimate percentage of patients with event. Patients with no event by the time of the scheduled visit or whose first event was after premature discontinuation of randomized study drug or tacrolimus were censored on the scheduled day of assessment, on the day of premature treatment discontinuation or last evaluation day, whichever came first." (NCT00113269)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionPercentage of Patients (Number)
Alemtuzumab High-Risk Patients95.6
Conventional High-Risk Patients92.1
Alemtuzumab Low- Risk Patients97.5
Conventional Low-Risk Patients95.1

[back to top]

Efficacy Failure

"Efficacy Failure is a composite measure of biopsy confirmed acute rejection, graft loss and death. Data is reported as the percentage of patients with Efficacy Failure.~End of Study was defined as the last day of evaluation and could have included bivariate assessments after 36 months." (NCT00113269)
Timeframe: End of Study (36 months)

InterventionPercentage of Patients (Number)
Alemtuzumab High-Risk Patients22.9
Conventional High-Risk Patients29.0
Alemtuzumab Low- Risk Patients15.9
Conventional Low-Risk Patients24.6

[back to top]

Clinically Treated Acute Rejection

"Clinically treated acute rejection is defined as patient incidence of any rejection (suspected or otherwise) for which treatment was provided. Data is reported as the percentage of patients with Clinically Treated Acute Rejection.~End of Study was defined as the last day of evaluation and could have included bivariate assessments after 36 months." (NCT00113269)
Timeframe: End of Study (36 months)

InterventionPercentage of Patients (Number)
Alemtuzumab High-Risk Patients22.9
Conventional High-Risk Patients21.7
Alemtuzumab Low- Risk Patients12.8
Conventional Low-Risk Patients26.9

[back to top]

Overall Patient Survival

"Overall patient survival is defined as not dead at any time following skin closure. Data is reported as the percentage of patients with Overall Patient Survival.~End of Study was defined as the last day of evaluation and could have included bivariate assessments after 36 months." (NCT00113269)
Timeframe: End of Study (36 months)

InterventionPercentage of Patients (Number)
Alemtuzumab High-Risk Patients95.7
Conventional High-Risk Patients89.9
Alemtuzumab Low- Risk Patients93.9
Conventional Low-Risk Patients95.3

[back to top]

Overall Patient Incidence of BCAR

"Overall patient incidence of BCAR is defined as a suspected new rejection at any time following skin closure confirmed by a Banff Grade ≥ 1A as assigned by a local pathologist. Incidence is reported as the percentage of patients with BCAR. The Banff 97 scale is a classification system for interpreting histology of allograft biopsies. The grades range from Mild (1A & 1B) to Moderate (2A & 2B) to Severe (3).~End of Study was defined as the last day of evaluation and could have included bivariate assessments after 36 months." (NCT00113269)
Timeframe: End of Study (36 months)

InterventionPercentage of Patients (Number)
Alemtuzumab High-Risk Patients15.7
Conventional High-Risk Patients13.0
Alemtuzumab Low- Risk Patients9.8
Conventional Low-Risk Patients21.6

[back to top]

Renal Function Abnormalities Based on Serum Creatinine

"Decrease in serum creatinine usually indicates an improvement.~Change in creatinine clearance from month 1 was calculated.~Change from 1 month is calculated by month 36 - month 1." (NCT00113269)
Timeframe: 1 month and End of Study (36 months)

,,,
Interventionmcmol/L (Mean)
Month 1 (N= 67; 65; 163; 162)Month 36 (N= 49; 47; 126; 131)Change from Month 1 (N= 49; 46; 126; 129)
Alemtuzumab High-Risk Patients151.7136.61.8
Alemtuzumab Low- Risk Patients139.0121.7-8.0
Conventional High-Risk Patients155.9152.03.4
Conventional Low-Risk Patients138.2117.1-18.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance

Mean percent change from baseline in calculated creatinine clearance (CL) at 6, 12, and 24 months posttransplantation (NCT00118742)
Timeframe: 6, 12, and 24 months posttransplantation

,
InterventionPercent change in creatinine CL (mL/min) (Mean)
6 months12 months24 months
CellCept + CNI (Tacrolimus or Cyclosporine)-1.3-3.0-12.8
CellCept + Sirolimus18.514.07.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 6 Months Posttransplant

Mean percent change from baseline in estimated GFR calculated by modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD)-6 variable equation at 6 and 24 months posttransplantation. MDRD-6 variables: serum creatinine, albumin and urea nitrogen, gender, age and ethnicity. (NCT00118742)
Timeframe: 6 months posttransplant

InterventionPercent change in GFR (mL/min) (Mean)
CellCept + CNI (Tacrolimus or Cyclosporine)1.1
CellCept + Sirolimus25.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 24 Months Posttransplant

Mean percent change from baseline in estimated GFR calculated by modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD)-6 variable equation at 6 and 24 months posttransplantation. MDRD-6 variables: serum creatinine, albumin and urea nitrogen, gender, age and ethnicity. (NCT00118742)
Timeframe: 24 months posttransplant

InterventionMean percent change in GFR (mL/min) (Mean)
CellCept + CNI (Tacrolimus or Cyclosporine)-8.6
CellCept + Sirolimus13.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 12 Months Posttransplant

Mean percent change from baseline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) calculated by modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD)-6 variable equation at 12 months posttransplantation. MDRD-6 variables: serum creatinine, albumin and urea nitrogen, gender, age and ethnicity. (NCT00118742)
Timeframe: 12 months posttransplant

InterventionPercent change in GFR (mL/min) (Mean)
CellCept + CNI (Tacrolimus or Cyclosporine)1.2
CellCept + Sirolimus19.7

[back to top]

The Time to Clearance of the Disease

The time to clearance of eczema measured in days (NCT00119158)
Timeframe: assessed up to 30 days following drug application

Interventiondays (Mean)
Active Therapy9.22
Placebo Arm7.88

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the m-EASI (Eczema Area Severity Index) Score.

"Eczema Area severity index (EASI) is a composition of scores based on area of eczema involved, (0 = mild to 3 = severe) for four separate Atopic Dermatitis (AD) symptoms: erythema,infiltration ⁄population, excoriation and ichenification.~Total score 0-12" (NCT00119158)
Timeframe: up to 15 days

Interventionunits of a 0-12 scale (Mean)
Active Therapy5.04
Placebo Arm4.77

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

PFS rate at 1 year. (NCT00121186)
Timeframe: 1, 3, and 12 months after protocol treatment, then every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for year 2, then annually thereafter until 5 years after registration

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant1

[back to top]

Overall Survival

OS rate at 1 year. (NCT00121186)
Timeframe: 1, 3, and 12 months after protocol treatment, then every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for year 2, then annually thereafter until 5 years after registration

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant1

[back to top]

Number of Participants That Died

(NCT00129961)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sirolimus (SRL) Based Regimen1
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Based Regimen1

[back to top]

Number of Lesion Free Subjects

The overall number of subjects who were lesion free were compared between treatment groups with the Cochran Mantel Haenszel test stratified by baseline NMSC stratum. Within each stratum, the Fisher exact test was used to compare the proportions of lesion free subjects between treatment groups. (NCT00129961)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sirolimus (SRL) Based Regimen17
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Based Regimen9

[back to top]

Time to First Biopsy Confirmed New NMSC Lesion.

The time to first biopsy confirmed new NMSC lesion starts at 1 day post randomization to biopsy and/or treatment of newly confirmed NMSC lesion. (NCT00129961)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

Interventionnumber of days (Median)
Sirolimus (SRL) Based Regimen380
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Based Regimen163

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Patients With New Biopsy-confirmed NMSC: Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) and Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC)

(NCT00129961)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
SCCBCC
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Based Regimen6931
Sirolimus (SRL) Based Regimen6733

[back to top]

Spot Urine Protein:Creatinine Ratio

Subjects' urine protein:creatinine ratios were summarized by each scheduled visit, and the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the difference between groups. (NCT00129961)
Timeframe: At 24 months (Week 104)

Interventionratio (mg/mg) (Median)
Sirolimus (SRL) Based Regimen0.14
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Based Regimen0.12

[back to top]

Serum Creatinine Level

Serum creatinine is an indicator of kidney function. Creatinine is a substance formed from the metabolism of creatinine, commonly found in blood, urine, and muscle tissue. It is removed from the blood by the kidneys and excreted in urine. An increased level of creatinine in the blood indicates decreased kidney function. Normal adult blood levels of creatinine are 0.5 to 1.1 mg/dL for females and 0.6 to 1.2 mg/dL for males, however the normal values are age-dependent as elderly patients typically have smaller muscle mass. (NCT00129961)
Timeframe: At 24 months (Week 104)

Interventionμmol/L (Mean)
Sirolimus (SRL) Based Regimen139.35
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Based Regimen135.23

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Biopsy-Confirmed Acute Rejection

(NCT00129961)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

Interventionsubjects (Number)
Sirolimus (SRL) Based Regimen0
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Based Regimen1

[back to top]

Grade Distribution of NMSC Lesions

Number of subjects with at least 1 biopsy-confirmed new squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or basal cell carcinoma (BCC). (NCT00129961)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SCC Well differentiatedSCC Moderately differentiatedSCC Poorly differentiatedSCC InvasiveSCC In SituSCC Invasive with Perineural InvasionSCC Invasive without Perineural InvasionBCC SuperficialBCC NodularBCC Infiltrative
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Based Regimen17141242712416156
Sirolimus (SRL) Based Regimen5911012287112

[back to top]

New Biopsy-Confirmed Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC) Lesions Per Subject Per Year

The number of new biopsy-confirmed NMSC lesions per subject per year was calculated by summarizing the total number of new BCC and SCC lesions reported over the observation period and standardizing it to an annual rate by multiplying by 365 and dividing by days on study. (NCT00129961)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

InterventionStandardized Yearly Rate of NMSC (Number)
Sirolimus (SRL) Based Regimen1.31
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Based Regimen2.48

[back to top]

Nankivell-Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

GFR is an index of kidney function. GFR describes the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR can be measured directly or estimated using established formulas. For this study, GFR was calculated using Nankivell. A normal GFR is > 90 mL/min, although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicate poor kidney function. A GFR <15 is consistent with kidney failure. (NCT00129961)
Timeframe: At 24 months (week 104)

Interventionunits on scale (Mean)
Sirolimus (SRL) Based Regimen72.49
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Based Regimen68.42

[back to top]

Graft Survival Measured by Graft Loss

Graft loss was defined as physical loss (nephrectomy), functional loss (necessitating maintenance dialysis for >8 consecutive weeks), retransplant, or death. (NCT00129961)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

Interventiongraft loss (Number)
Sirolimus (SRL) Based Regimen2
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Based Regimen1

[back to top]

Death Due to NMSC

(NCT00129961)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sirolimus (SRL) Based Regimen0
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Based Regimen0

[back to top]

Number of Recurrent NMSC Lesions Per Subject-year

Recurrent NMSC lesions is defined as recurring at the site of a previously treated lesion. (NCT00129961)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

Interventionlesions per participant year (Number)
Sirolimus (SRL) Based Regimen0.107
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Based Regimen0.134

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Discontinue Assigned Therapy

(NCT00129961)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sirolimus (SRL) Based Regimen31
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Based Regimen23

[back to top]

Cataract - Incident Cataract

(NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of eyes with uveitis at risk (Number)
Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant90.7
Systemic Therapy44.9

[back to top]

Change in SF-36 Mental Component Score From Baseline to 24 Months

Self-reported health related QoL was measured with the SF 36 survey. The mental component score for the SF 36 is a summary measure of mental health primarily based on the social functioning, role emotional, mental health and vitality domains. The score is scaled to a population norm with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Higher scores represent better outcomes. The mean change in scores between baseline and 24 months was calculated for each treatment group. (NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Flucinolone Acetonide Implant2.55
Systemic Therapy-1.1

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) - Incident Use of IOP-lowering Medical Therapy (Percentage of Eyes With Uveitis That Were Not Being Treated With IOP-lowering Medical Therapy at Baseline and Underwent IOP Lowering Therapy During the 24 Month Follow-up.

The percentage of subjects who used topical or systemic treatment for elevated IOP at any time during the 2 year follow-up and were not on IOP-lowering therapy at baseline is reported. (NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of eyes with uveitis at risk (Number)
Flucinolone Acetonide Implant61.1
Systemic Therapy20.1

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure - IOP-lowering Surgery

(NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of eyes with uveitis at risk (Number)
Flucinolone Acetonide Implant26.2
Systemic Therapy3.7

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure - Incident IOP Greater Than or Equal to 30 mm Hg

(NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of eyes with uveitis at risk (Number)
Flucinolone Acetonide Implant32.8
Systemic Therapy6.3

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure - Incident IOP Greater Than or Equal to 24 mm Hg

(NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of eyes with uveitis at risk (Number)
Flucinolone Acetonide Implant53.1
Systemic Therapy18.7

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure - Incident IOP Elevation >= 10 mmHg Above Baseline

(NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of eyes with uveitis at risk (Number)
Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant51.8
Systemic Therapy15.5

[back to top]

Hypertension Diagnosis Requiring Treatment

(NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Flucinolone Acetonide Implant4.6
Systemic Therapy10.5

[back to top]

Hyperlipidemia - Incident

LDL greater than or equal to 160 mg/mL (NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants at risk (Number)
Flucinolone Acetonide Implant9.8
Systemic Therapy11.0

[back to top]

Glaucoma - Incident

Glaucoma was diagnosed by a glaucoma specialist through review of visual fields, clinical data, and fundus images. (NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of eyes with uveitis at risk (Number)
Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant16.5
Systemic Therapy4.0

[back to top]

Diabetes Mellitus

(NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Flucinolone Acetonide Implant1.0
Systemic Therapy3.6

[back to top]

Change in SF-36 Physical Component Score From Baseline to 24 Months

Self-reported health related QoL was measured with the SF 36 survey. The physical component score for the SF 36 is a summary measure of physical health primarily based on the physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain and general health domains of the survey. The score is scaled to a population norm with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Higher scores represent better outcomes. The mean change in scores between baseline and 24 months was calculated for each treatment group. A 3 to 5 point difference is considered to be clinically meaningful. (NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Flucinolone Acetonide Implant1.15
Systemic Therapy-1.8

[back to top] [back to top]

Uveitis Activity

Uveitis activity was determined by clinician assessment at each study visit. The study ophthalmologist evaluated each eye as active, inactive/never had uveitis or cannot assess. (NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of eyes with uveitis (Number)
Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant12
Systemic Therapy29

[back to top]

Mortality

(NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Flucinolone Acetonide Implant1.6
Systemic Therapy0

[back to top]

Macular Edema

center point macular thickness >= 240 micrometers assessed on OCT (Stratus OCT-3 [Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA]) as graded by Central Reading Center (NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of eyes with uveitis (Number)
Flucinolone Acetonide Implant22
Systemic Therapy30

[back to top]

Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (Change in the Numbers of Letters Read From a Standard ETDRS Eye Chart) From Baseline to 24 Months in Eyes With Uveitis

Best-corrected visual acuity was measured as the number of letters read from standard logarithmic visual acuity charts by study-certified examiners who were masked to treatment. Visual acuity was measured at all study visits. The primary outcome was eye-specific change in visual acuity from baseline to 2-year follow-up. Positive change values indicate improved vision while negative change values indicate vision has gotten worse. A change of 7.5 letters is considered clinically meaningful. (NCT00132691)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionletters (Mean)
Flucinolone Acetonide Implant6.0
Systemic Therapy3.2

[back to top]

Hematologic and Non-hematologic Toxicities as Measured by NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, v 3.0 Weekly Until 1 Year After Transplantation

Percentage of study participants who experienced a serious adverse event (SAE) within 1 year of bone marrow transplant. Complete data is provided in the Adverse Event tables. (NCT00134004)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Mini-haplo BMT9.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Relapse Rate

Percentage of participants who experience disease relapse. (NCT00134004)
Timeframe: Cumulative incidence for the entire study, up to 11 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Mini-haplo BMT55

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Percentage of participants who do not experience disease relapse, disease progression, or death. (NCT00134004)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Mini-haplo BMT34

[back to top]

Graft Failure Rate

Percentage of participants who experienced failure to engraft (also called graft failure or graft rejection). Failure to engraft is defined as <5% donor chimerism and absence of relapse or any other reason for that chimerism value. All participants who met this criterion were included in this outcome measure. (NCT00134004)
Timeframe: Cumulative incidence for the entire study, up to 11 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Mini-haplo BMT13

[back to top]

The Difference in Linear Growth by Treatment Assignment at 1 Year Post Kidney Transplantation

Standardized Z-scores were computed following a formula using an age- and gender-specific calculation provided by the NHANES III 2000 Growth Data set. The Z-score system expresses anthropometric values of height as several standard deviations (SDs) below (e.g., a negative value) or above (a positive value) the reference mean or median value. In this study the measure was used to test whether there is a difference in the change in height between the treatment groups: Steroid-Based versus Steroid-Free (NCT00141037)
Timeframe: One year post kidney transplantation procedure

InterventionStandard Deviation Score (SDS) (Mean)
Steroid-Free Immunosuppression0.37
Steroid-Based Immunosuppression0.35

[back to top]

Comparison by Treatment Assignment in the Number of Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejections Within 12 Months Post Kidney Transplantation

"Biopsy-proven acute renal (kidney) rejection [1, 2].~Diagnosis of acute rejection was made by renal biopsy using the Banff 97 criteria. The Banff 97 diagnostic category for renal allograft biopsies is an international standardized histopathological classification. Acute rejection is defined by a renal biopsy demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection[2]~Ref: Racusen LC et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int, 55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00141037)
Timeframe: Up to one year post kidney transplantation procedure

InterventionRejection Events (Number)
Steroid-Free Immunosuppression18
Steroid-Based Immunosuppression19

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With an Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) During the First 3 Months Post de Novo Liver Transplantation.

A BPAR is defined when the investigator had a suspicion of an acute rejection, where the final clinical diagnosis confirmed the occurrence of an acute rejection, where a biopsy was performed that confirmed the presence of an acute rejection, and where anti-rejection treatment intervention was initiated. The efficacy measured the first rejections (clinically and biopsy proven rejections) at 3 months. (NCT00149994)
Timeframe: Month 3

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Cyclosporine A33.3
Tacrolimus32.9

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: Cystatin-C

Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment. (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult1.291.480.27
Tacrolimus - Adult1.211.290.06

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: BNP

"Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment.~BNP= Brain Natriuretic Peptide" (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionng/L (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult4240.81856.8-1446.7
Tacrolimus - Adult4314.8670.1-4018.4

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: IL-18

Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment. (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult496.2427.2-71.0
Tacrolimus - Adult574.0534.65.2

[back to top]

Number of Acute Rejection Episodes by International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Criteria (Pediatric Population)

"Acute rejection was defined as a rejection with ISHLT Grade ≥3A or by the presence of hemodynamic compromise.~ISHLT Grades ≥3A include: Multifocal Moderate Rejection; Diffuse, Borderline Severe Acute Rejection; and Severe Acute Rejection.~Patients may report more than one rejection episode." (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 52 Weeks

,
InterventionRejection Episodes (Number)
Total Acute Rejection EpisodesAcute Rejection Episodes with ISHLT Grade ≥3AAcute Rejection Episodes w/ Hemodynamic Compromise
Cyclosporine - Pediatric330
Tacrolimus - Pediatric330

[back to top]

Number of Acute Rejection Episodes by International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Criteria

"Acute rejection was defined as a rejection with ISHLT Grade ≥3A or by the presence of hemodynamic compromise.~ISHLT Grades ≥3A include: Multifocal Moderate Rejection; Diffuse, Borderline Severe Acute Rejection; and Severe Acute Rejection.~Patients may report more than one acute rejection." (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 52 Weeks

,
InterventionRejection Episodes (Number)
Total Acute Rejection EpisodesAcute Rejection Episodes with ISHLT Grade ≥3AAcute Rejection Episodes w/ Hemodynamic Compromise
Cyclosporine - Adult872
Tacrolimus - Adult836

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: T-bars

"Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment.~T-bars = thiobarbituric acid reactive substances" (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionnmol/mL (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult3.913.14-0.77
Tacrolimus - Adult3.783.25-0.64

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: Troponin T

Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment. (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionug/L (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult0.280.04-0.27
Tacrolimus - Adult0.300.03-0.32

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation and Oxidation: Nitrotyrosine (Pediatric Population)

Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
InterventionnM (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Pediatric12701.2141147.6221514.62
Tacrolimus - Pediatric233.085462.995148.42

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation and Oxidation: hsCRP (Pediatric Population)

Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Pediatric12.082.43-13.94
Tacrolimus - Pediatric30.4626.31-7.85

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation and Oxidation: F2 Isoprostanes (Pediatric Population)

Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Pediatric104.6866.48-30.07
Tacrolimus - Pediatric106.0669.71-38.31

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation and Oxidation: Cystatin-C (Pediatric Population)

Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Pediatric0.770.84-0.01
Tacrolimus - Pediatric0.860.87-0.11

[back to top]

Time to First Acute Rejection Episode Following de Novo Cardiac Transplant

"Acute Rejection was defined as a rejection with ISHLT Grade ≥3A or by the presence of hemodynamic compromise.~ISHLT Grades ≥3A include: Multifocal Moderate Rejection; Diffuse, Borderline Severe Acute Rejection; and Severe Acute Rejection.~Time to first acute rejection is defined as: date of onset - date of transplant." (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 52 Weeks

InterventionDays (Mean)
Tacrolimus - Adult55.0
Cyclosporine - Adult35.60

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Successful Steroid Taper or Withdrawal at Weeks 26 and 52

A successful steroid taper or withdrawal was defined as steroids (prednisone) being discontinued or tapered to the suggested dose level after week 26. (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

,
InterventionPatients (Number)
Week 26Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult1629
Tacrolimus - Adult2233

[back to top]

Number of Patients Requiring Antilymphocyte Antibodies or Steroids for Treatment of Severe Acute Rejection (Pediatric Population)

Severe Acute Rejection was defined as rejection with ISHLT Grade 4. (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 52 Weeks

InterventionPatients (Number)
Tacrolimus - Pediatric0
Cyclosporine - Pediatric0

[back to top]

Number of Patients Requiring Antilymphocyte Antibodies or Steroids for Treatment of Severe Acute Rejection

Severe Acute Rejection is defined as rejection with ISHLT Grade 4. (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 52 Weeks

InterventionPatients (Number)
Tacrolimus - Adult0
Cyclosporine - Adult0

[back to top]

Number of Cardiac Rejection Episodes Requiring Treatment (Pediatric Population)

A summary of rejection episodes requiring treatment regardless of biopsy grade or presence of hemodynamic compromise. (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 52 Weeks

InterventionRejection Episodes (Number)
Tacrolimus - Pediatric3
Cyclosporine - Pediatric3

[back to top]

Mean Cases of Acute Rejection (MCAR) Per Patient (Pediatric Population)

"MCAR represents the average number of acute rejections among all patients in each treatment group. Results were based on rejection episodes with endomyocardial biopsies.~Acute rejection was defined as a rejection with ISHLT Grade ≥3A or by the presence of hemodynamic compromise.~ISHLT Grades ≥3A include: Multifocal Moderate Rejection; Diffuse, Borderline Severe Acute Rejection; and Severe Acute Rejection." (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 52 Weeks

InterventionMCAR per patient (Mean)
Tacrolimus - Pediatric0.60
Cyclosporine - Pediatric0.50

[back to top]

Number of Cardiac Rejection Episodes Requiring Treatment

The number of rejection episodes requiring treatment (medications started/ stopped, non-medication treatment, or both) regardless of biopsy grade or presence of hemodynamic compromise. (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 52 Weeks

InterventionRejection Episodes (Number)
Tacrolimus - Adult12
Cyclosporine - Adult11

[back to top]

Mean Cases of Acute Rejection (MCAR) Per Patient

"MCAR represents the average number of acute rejections among all patients in each treatment group. Results were based on rejection episodes with endomyocardial biopsies.~Acute rejection was defined as a rejection with ISHLT Grade ≥3A or by the presence of hemodynamic compromise.~ISHLT Grades ≥3A include: Multifocal Moderate Rejection; Diffuse, Borderline Severe Acute Rejection; and Severe Acute Rejection." (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 52 Weeks

InterventionMCAR per patient (Mean)
Tacrolimus - Adult0.15
Cyclosporine - Adult0.17

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Successful Steroid Taper or Withdrawal at Weeks 26 and 52 (Pediatric Population)

A successful steroid taper or withdrawal was defined as steroids (prednisone) being discontinued or tapered to the suggested dose level after week 26. (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

,
InterventionPatients (Number)
Week 26Week 52
Cyclosporine - Pediatric31
Tacrolimus - Pediatric21

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Treatment Failure and Crossover for Treatment Failure

"Treatment failure was defined as death, re-transplantation, withdrawal due to an Adverse Event, or a switch of main immunosuppressant medication, whichever came first.~Crossover was defined as a switch from originally administered primary immunosuppressant (tacrolimus or cyclosporine) to the alternate primary immunosuppressant." (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 52 Weeks

,
InterventionPatients (Number)
Treatment FailuresCrossover for Treatment Failures
Cyclosporine - Adult118
Tacrolimus - Adult62

[back to top]

Time to First Acute Rejection Episode Following de Novo Cardiac Transplant (Pediatric Population)

"Acute Rejection was defined as a rejection with ISHLT Grade ≥3A or by the presence of hemodynamic compromise.~ISHLT Grades ≥3A include: Multifocal Moderate Rejection; Diffuse, Borderline Severe Acute Rejection; and Severe Acute Rejection.~Time to first acute rejection is defined as: date of onset - date of transplant." (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 52 Weeks

InterventionDays (Mean)
Tacrolimus - Pediatric56.3
Cyclosporine - Pediatric49.0

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Treatment Failure and Crossover for Treatment Failure (Pediatric Population)

"Treatment failure was defined as death, re-transplantation, withdrawal due to an Adverse Event, or a switch of main immunosuppressant medication, whichever came first.~Crossover was defined as a switch from originally administered primary immunosuppressant (tacrolimus or cyclosporine) to the alternate primary immunosuppressant." (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 52 Weeks

,
InterventionPatients (Number)
Treatment FailuresCrossover for Treatment Failures
Cyclosporine - Pediatric33
Tacrolimus - Pediatric10

[back to top]

The Change in the Markers of Growth, Apoptosis, Inflammation and Oxidation Measured in Endomyocardial Biopsies

"The markers assessed were p-ERK ½ (phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase), p-JNK (phosphorylated jun N-terminal kinase) and p-p38 MAPK (phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase).~The data for each biopsy marker were expressed as a ratio of its densitometry / densitometry of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH).~Change is defined as Week 52 assessment- Week 2 assessment." (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 2 Weeks and 52 Weeks

,
InterventionDensitometry / Densitometry of GAPDH (Mean)
p-ERK ½ - Week 2p-ERK ½ - Week 52p-ERK ½ - Change from Week 2p-JNK - Week 2p-JNK - Week 52p-JNK - Change from Week 2p-p38 MAPK - Week 2p-p38 MAPK - Week 52p-p38 MAPK - Change from Week 2
Cyclosporine - Adult0.900.79-0.051.231.460.220.540.770.23
Tacrolimus - Adult0.700.870.051.101.330.030.480.630.14

[back to top]

The Change in the Markers of Growth, Apoptosis, Inflammation and Oxidation Measured in Endomyocardial Biopsies (Pediatric Population)

"The markers assessed were p-ERK ½, p-JNK and p-p38 MAPK.~The data for each biopsy marker were expressed as a ratio of its densitometry / densitometry of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH).~Change is defined as Week 52 assessment- Week 2 assessment." (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: 2 Weeks and 52 Weeks

,
InterventionDensitometry / Densitometry of GAPDH (Mean)
p-ERK ½ - Week 2p-ERK ½ - Week 52p-ERK ½ - Change from Week 2p-JNK - Week 2p-JNK - Week 52p-JNK - Change from Week 2p-p38 MAPK - Week 2p-p38 MAPK - Week 52p-p38 MAPK - Change from Week 2
Cyclosporine - Pediatric1.671.22-0.270.910.820.040.430.580.34
Tacrolimus - Pediatric1.740.93-0.091.170.57-0.210.830.24-0.04

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: E-selectin

Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment. (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult98.9680.93-19.16
Tacrolimus - Adult90.4068.60-18.58

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: F2 Isoprostanes

Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment. (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult53.9450.44-3.43
Tacrolimus - Adult52.0330.08-13.29

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: Fibrinogen

Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment. (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventiong/L (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult4.43.8-0.5
Tacrolimus - Adult4.43.4-1.1

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: GSH/GSSG

"Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment.~GSH/GSSG= ratio of reduced to oxidised glutathione" (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
InterventionRatio (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult58.8353.72-5.55
Tacrolimus - Adult55.0751.69-2.07

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: Homocysteine

Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment. (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionμmol/L (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult15.915.80.7
Tacrolimus - Adult14.213.50.3

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: hsCRP

"Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment.~hsCRP= high-sensitivity C Reactive Protein" (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult21.833.95-18.69
Tacrolimus - Adult32.853.01-34.32

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: IL-6

"Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment.~IL= Interleukin" (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult2.540.90-1.56
Tacrolimus - Adult3.360.98-2.84

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: MCP-1

"Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment.~MCP-1= monocyte chemoattractant protein-1" (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult193.63180.90-16.49
Tacrolimus - Adult233.05229.9642.92

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: Nitrotyrosine

Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment. (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
InterventionnM (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult482.43368.95-99.79
Tacrolimus - Adult422.63451.8871.44

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: Osteopontin

Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment. (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult11.1410.490.20
Tacrolimus - Adult11.888.77-2.22

[back to top]

Changes in Circulating Markers of Inflammation, Oxidation, Growth, Apoptosis, Differentiation and Survival: s-ICAM

"Change is defined as Week 52 assessment - Pre-Transplant assessment.~s-ICAM= soluble-intracellular adhesion molecule" (NCT00157014)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplant and 52 Weeks

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-TransplantWeek 52Change from Pre-Transplant at Week 52
Cyclosporine - Adult674.46503.71-183.96
Tacrolimus - Adult766.58590.30-227.58

[back to top]

Freedom From HCV Recurrence Within First Year That Requires HCV Antiviral Therapy and Freedom From Treatment Failure

Participants would have their blood drawn and tested for the HCV virus to determine if they had recurrence (NCT00163657)
Timeframe: 12 month post transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment Arm 139
Treatment Arm 239
Treatment Arm 372

[back to top]

Freedom From Acute Rejection or HCV Recurrence or Treatment Failure

"Freedom from acute rejection (Banff>grade 2 with RAI score>4) or freedom from HCV recurrence (Batts/Ludwig>Stage 2, or >Grade 3) that requires HCV antiviral therapy or treatment failure (patient death, graft loss, premature withdrawal from study regimen or treatment with more than 1 dose of corticosteroids for presumptive rejection without a biopsy to confirm the rejection; reported values represent the Number of participants with Freedom From Acute Rejection or HCV Recurrence or Treatment Failure" (NCT00163657)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment Arm 169
Treatment Arm 270
Treatment Arm 3133

[back to top]

The Incidence of Biopsy-proven Acute Allograft Rejection During the First 12 Months of Transplant.

The incidence of rejection is determined by the proportion of patients experiencing biopsy proven acute allograft rejection during the first 12 months post-transplant. (NCT00166712)
Timeframe: Within 12 months post kidney transplant

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Groups4
Group 26

[back to top]

Number of Chronic Allograft Nephropathies

"Number of chronic allograft nephropathies[1,2,3] at 3 years post kidney transplant.~Chronic allograft nephropathy is defined as renal biopsies with Banff 97 Grade I or greater[2] with higher numeric scores indicating more severe nephropathy~The Banff 97 diagnostic category for renal allograft biopsies is an international standardized histopathological classification[3]~Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int, 55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00183248)
Timeframe: Three years post kidney transplant

InterventionNephropathy Events (Number)
DBMCs6
Control Group2

[back to top]

Graft Survival at Three Years Post-Transplant

"Number of participants that did not experience kidney graft failure[1] at three years post-transplant~[1]Graft failure is defined as the institution of chronic dialysis (at least 6 consecutive weeks, excluding participants with delayed graft function), transplant nephrectomy, or retransplantation." (NCT00183248)
Timeframe: Three years post kidney transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
DBMCs4
Control Group5

[back to top]

Overall Participant Survival at One Year Post Kidney Transplant

(NCT00183248)
Timeframe: One year post kidney transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
DBMCs4
Control Group5

[back to top]

Number of Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) Events

A disease caused when cells from a donated stem cell graft attack the normal tissue of the transplant patient. Symptoms include jaundice, skin rash or blisters, a dry mouth, or dry eyes. Also called graft-versus-host disease. (NCT00183248)
Timeframe: Three years post kidney transplant

InterventionGVHD Events (Number)
DBMCs0
Control Group0

[back to top]

Participant Survival at Three Years Post Kidney Transplant

(NCT00183248)
Timeframe: Three years post kidney transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
DBMCs4
Control Group5

[back to top]

Overall Kidney Graft Survival at One Year Post-Transplant

"Number of participants that did not experience kidney graft failure[1] at one year post-transplant~[1]Graft failure is defined as the institution of chronic dialysis (at least 6 consecutive weeks, excluding participants with delayed graft function), transplant nephrectomy, or retransplantation." (NCT00183248)
Timeframe: One year post kidney transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
DBMCs4
Control Group5

[back to top]

Number of Kidney Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection

"Biopsy-proven acute renal (kidney) rejection[1,2].~Diagnosis of acute rejection was made by renal biopsy using the Banff 97 criteria. The Banff 97 diagnostic category for renal allograft biopsies is an international standardized histopathological classification. Acute rejection is defined by a renal biopsy demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection[2]~Ref: Racusen LC et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int, 55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00183248)
Timeframe: Three years post kidney transplant

InterventionRejection Events (Number)
DBMCs1
Control Group1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Biopsy Confirmed Acute Rejection at 12 Months Follow up.

Diagnosis of acute rejection was made via kidney biopsy using the Banff criteria (a standardized model for interpretation of renal allograft biopsies). (NCT00195429)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Subjects with Acute RejectionSubjects without Acute Rejection
Sirolimus + Prednisone320
Sirolimus + Tacrolimus321

[back to top]

Creatinine Clearance Rate

Creatinine clearance is a measure of kidney function. Creatinine clearance rate (CCr) is the volume of blood plasma that is cleared of creatinine by the kidneys per unit time. Creatinine clearance can be measured directly or estimated using established formulas. For this study, CCr was calculated using the Nakivell formula. Normal values for healthy, young males are in the range of 100-135 ml/min and for females, 90-125 ml/min. Creatinine clearance decreases with age. A low creatinine clearance rate indicates poor kidney function. (NCT00195429)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionml/min (Mean)
Sirolimus + Tacrolimus60
Sirolimus + Prednisone63.4

[back to top]

The Proportion of Participants With Graft Loss or Death Within 12 Months Post Kidney Transplantation

Graft loss is defined as the need for dialysis for more than 30 days duration, allograft nephrectomy, or the decision to withdraw immunosuppression due to graft failure. (NCT00240994)
Timeframe: Up to one year post kidney transplantation procedure

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Campath)0.057

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Combined Endpoint of Death or Graft Loss or Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)

BPAR was defined as a treated acute rejection confirmed by biopsy. The local pathologist graded biopsies according to the Banff (1997) criteria. Graft loss was considered to have occurred when allograft was presumed to be lost if a patient had a liver re-transplant or died. (NCT00260208)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cyclosporin A45
Tacrolimus42

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Combined Endpoint of Death or Graft Loss or Fibrosis Score (FS) ≥ 2

The number of participants with combined end point of death or graft loss or presented with a Ishak-Knodell fibrosis score (FS) ≥2 was calculated. Graft loss was considered to have occurred when allograft was presumed to be lost if a patient had liver retransplant or died. Assessment of hepatic fibrosis was performed with liver biopsies read centrally. Ishak-Knodell FS was used to stage liver disease; 0=none; 1=portal fibrosis (some); 2=portal fibrosis (most); 3=bridging fibrosis (few); 4=bridging fibrosis (many); 5=Incomplete cirrhosis; 6=cirrhosis. Higher score indicates greater fibrosis. (NCT00260208)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cyclosporin A77
Tacrolimus71

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Death or Re-transplantation Due to Recurrence of Hepatitis C Cirrhosis

Cirrhosis was resulted due to the recurrence of the hepatitis C virus infection in the transplanted liver. (NCT00260208)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cyclosporin A16
Tacrolimus17

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Fibrosis Score 2 or Above [Ishak-Knodell Fibrosis Score (FS) ≥ 2] Within 1 Year Post-transplant

Assessment of hepatic fibrosis was performed with liver biopsies at Day 1, Month 6, 12 and 24, read centrally by two independent pathologists blinded to treatment arm and time of biopsy. Ishak-Knodell score was used to stage liver disease; 0= None; 1= Portal fibrosis (some); 2= Portal fibrosis (most); 3= Bridging fibrosis (few); 4= Bridging fibrosis (many); 5 = Incomplete cirrhosis; 6 = Cirrhosis. Higher score indicates greater fibrosis. Logistic regression on the presence of IK>=2 was applied based on central biopsy readings only. (NCT00260208)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cyclosporin A63
Tacrolimus52

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Fibrosis Score 2 or Above [Ishak-Knodell Fibrosis Score (FS) ≥ 2] Within 1 Year Post-transplant (Intent to Treat Population)

Assessment of hepatic fibrosis was performed with liver biopsies at Day 1, Month 6, 12 and 24, read centrally by two independent pathologists blinded to treatment arm and time of biopsy. Ishak-Knodell score was used to stage liver disease; 0= None; 1= Portal fibrosis (some); 2= Portal fibrosis (most); 3= Bridging fibrosis (few); 4= Bridging fibrosis (many); 5 = Incomplete cirrhosis; 6 = Cirrhosis. Higher score indicates greater fibrosis. (NCT00260208)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cyclosporin A63
Tacrolimus54

[back to top]

Log-transformed Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HCV RNA) Values up to 1 Year Post Transplant

HCV RNA was measured (IU/µL)centrally pre-transplant (Day 1) and at 48 hours (Day 3), Day 8 and 29, Month 6 and 12 post-transplant and concomitantly to any additional biopsies performed. (NCT00260208)
Timeframe: Pre-transplant (Day 1), Day , Day 8, Day 29, Month 6 and 12 post- transplant

,
InterventionIU/µL (Mean)
Day 1 (n=116, 111)Day 3 (n= 136, 120)Day 8 (n= 122, 117)Day 29 (n=128, 109)Month 6 (n=96, 98)Month 12 (n= 85, 88)
Cyclosporin A0.710.981.582.563.453.17
Tacrolimus0.620.911.452.743.143.13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Death, Graft Loss, Death or Graft Loss, Graft Loss With Re-transplantation

Graft loss was considered to have occurred when allograft was presumed to be lost if a patient had a liver re-transplant or died. (NCT00260208)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
DeathGraft lossDeath or Graft lossGraft loss with re-transplantation
Cyclosporin A158193
Tacrolimus1513238

[back to top]

Mean Value of Liver Function Tests at 1 Year Post-transplantation

"The mean value (in Units per liter, IU/L) of following tests were calculated at 1 year post-transplant:~Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT)~Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT)~Bilirubin~Alkaline Phosphate~γ-Glutamyltransferase (GGT)" (NCT00260208)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

,
InterventionIU/L (Mean)
SGPT (n= 112, 112)SGOT (n= 112,112)Bilirubin (n= 111, 115)Alkaline Phosphate (n= 111, 115)GGT (n= 103, 110)
Cyclosporin A100.592.040.3174.7182.2
Tacrolimus81.772.819.3152.9168.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treated Acute Rejection, Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), and Sub-clinical Rejection

Treated acute rejection is defined as an acute rejection, clinically suspected, whether biopsy-proven or not, which has been treated and confirmed by the investigator according to the response to therapy. BPAR was defined as a treated acute rejection confirmed by biopsy. The local pathologist graded biopsies according to the Banff (1997) criteria. A sub-clinical rejection was defined as a rejection identified by center driven biopsy, i.e. a biopsy performed routinely at some pre-defined time points after transplantation as per center practice in the absence of any clinical signs of rejection. (NCT00260208)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Treated acute rejectionBiopsy prove acute rejection (BPAR)Sub-clinical rejection
Cyclosporin A28284
Tacrolimus22194

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Fibrosing Cholestatic Hepatitis

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) is characterized by progressive jaundice with a rapid decline in liver function leading to liver failure, most often associated with markedly elevated viral levels detected in the bloodstream (e.g. more than 20 times pre-liver transplantation levels) and in the liver tissue as well. The presence of FCH was reported based on the diagnosis given by the investigator. (NCT00260208)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cyclosporin A9
Tacrolimus6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Ratio of Serum LDL Cholesterol to Serum HDL Cholesterol <3.5 by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 9 (n=18,12,11)Month 12 (n=16,14,12)Month 15 (n=16,14,11)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=15,14,9)Month 42 (n=15,13,9)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,13,10)Month 60 (n=13,13,10)Month 66 (n=12,13,10)Month 72 (n=9,12,8)Month 78 (n=0,12,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,7)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-Up (n=6,12,8)
Tacrolimus94.493.8100.094.494.178.693.393.393.371.476.983.388.9NANANANA100.0
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID75.085.792.9100.0100.0100.0100.0100.092.992.3100.092.3100.0100.0100.0100.0100.091.7
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID90.983.3100.091.791.7100.0100.0100.090.090.090.090.075.087.587.5100.0100.062.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Ratio of Total Serum Cholesterol to Serum HDL Cholesterol <5 by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 9 (n=18,14,12)Month 12 (n=16,14,12)Month 15 (n=16,14,12)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=15,14,9)Month 42 (n=15,14,9)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,13,10)Month 66 (n=12,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,12,8)Month 78 (n=0,12,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,7)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-Up (n=6,12,8)
Tacrolimus94.487.593.888.988.278.686.786.786.778.669.283.388.9NANANANA100.0
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID71.485.792.992.985.792.9100.078.692.985.792.392.9100.0100.091.7100.0100.091.7
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID66.775.066.775.066.770.0100.0100.080.090.080.090.075.087.550.0100.0100.050.0

[back to top]

Ratio of Fasting Serum Proinsulin (Pmol/L) to Insulin (Pmol/L) by Visit

Measured only in participants who were non-diabetic prior to kidney transplantation and who did not require treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin prior to the time of measurement. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 12 and 24

,,
Interventionratio of serum proinsulin to insulin (Mean)
Month 12 (n=5,3,3)Month 24 (n=3,4,2)
Tacrolimus0.150.64
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID0.320.30
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID0.400.22

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Serum Glucose (mg*h/dL) Measured During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) by Visit

Only performed in participants who were non-diabetic prior to kidney transplantation and who did not require treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 12 and 24

,,
Interventionmg*h/dL (Mean)
Month 12 (n=10,6,6)Month 24 (n=12,8,5)
Tacrolimus234.78230.10
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID254.25236.94
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID281.54281.90

[back to top]

Trough Levels of Tacrolimus (ng/mL) by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, and 72 and Follow-up (Month 98)

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Month 9 (n=16)Month 12 (n=10)Month 18 (n=17)Month 24 (n=9)Month 30 (n=12)Month 36 (n=15)Month 42 (n=13)Month 48 (n=15)Month 54 (n=1)Month 60 (n=12)Month 72 (n=8)Follow-up (n=1)
Tacrolimus7.009.508.008.786.176.877.088.0710.006.587.138.00

[back to top]

Total Cholesterol Levels by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Month 9 (n=18,14,12)Month 12 (n=16,14,12)Month 15 (n=16,14,12)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=15,14,9)Month 42 (n=15,14,9)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,13,10)Month 66 (n=12,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,12,8)Month 78 (n=0,13,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,7)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-Up (n=6,12,8)
Tacrolimus187.94180.31171.06173.28185.53175.43175.80179.87188.87184.86178.77188.25177.22NANANANA191.83
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID233.71228.57208.79185.21188.64185.71174.86206.29195.79201.79184.23185.64186.42191.85192.42185.92183.27185.58
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID198.58210.08198.58192.00201.58198.30202.22187.67180.10183.70189.10172.20200.25195.00204.00189.86188.00213.13

[back to top]

Tofacitinib Concentrations in Plasma (ng/mL) by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-up (Month 98)

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Month 9, predose (n=13,11)Month 9, 0.5 hours postdose (n=0,1)Month 12, predose (n=13,12)Month 12, 1 hour postdose (n=1,0)Month 18, predose (n=12,10)Month 18, 0.5 hours postdose (n=0,1)Month 18, 1 hour postdose (n=0,1)Month 24, predose (n=14,12)Month 24, 0.5 hours postdose (n=5,2)Month 24, 1 hour postdose (n=6,3)Month 30, predose (n=14,9)Month 30, 0.5 hours postdose (n=5,2)Month 30, 1 hour postdose (n=5,2)Month 36, predose (n=14,8)Month 42, predose (n=14, 8)Month 48, predose (n=12,9)Month 48, 0.5 hours postdose (n=1,1)Month 48, 1 hour postdose (n=1,0)Month 54, predose (n=14,10)Month 60, predose (n=11,10)Month 60, 0.5 hours postdose (n=1,0)Month 66, predose (n=11,10)Month 66, 0.5 hours postdose (n=1,2)Month 66, 1 hour postdose (n=1,1)Month 72, predose (n=9,7)Month 78, predose (n=10,8)Month 84, predose (n=11,5)Month 90, predose (n=10,5)Month 90, 0.5 hours postdose (n=0,1)Month 96, predose (n=10,6)Follow-up, predose (n=1,1)Follow-up, 0.5 hours postdose (n=2,4)
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID40.97NA14.7551.5013.77NANA15.4328.0240.886.5351.4457.786.7319.709.711.0056.6015.9910.6941.1014.6427.7018.9010.074.1321.466.91NA21.0716.002.57
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID12.3824.0032.86NA7.8486.3080.7028.1596.3072.3316.1854.9598.4513.2822.0115.5455.70NA24.7415.03NA22.7829.7529.1020.4318.9411.9313.2817.7031.971.005.39

[back to top]

Short-Form 36 Version 2 (SF-36 v2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores by Visit and Scale

"The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS). Total of 11 variables were analyzed (8 subscales, 2 composite subscales and Question 2 how would you rate your health in general now? (range 1= better, 5= worst). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning)." (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 12, 18, and 24

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
PCS: Month 12 (n=12,13,9)PCS: Month 18 (n=15,12,10)PCS: Month 24 (n=16,13,12)MCS: Month 12 (n=12,13,9)MCS: Month 18 (n=15,12,10)MCS: Month 24 (n=16,13,12)
Tacrolimus54.3353.7650.8253.3949.7050.70
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID51.7150.6752.1750.8353.9255.61
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID46.0546.8948.8554.0851.4452.14

[back to top]

SF-36 v2 Subscale Scores by Visit

"SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as PCS and MCS. Total of 11 variables were analyzed (8 subscales, 2 composite subscales and Question 2 how would you rate your health in general now? (range 1= better, 5= worst). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning)." (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 12, 18, and 24

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Phys Func: Month 12 (n=13,13,9)Phys Func: Month 18 (n=15,12,10)Phys Func: Month 24 (n=16,13,12)Physical: Month 12 (n=13,13,9)Physical: Month 18 (n=15,12,10)Physical: Month 24 (n=16,13,12)Bodily Pain: Month 12 (n=13,13,9)Bodily Pain: Month 18 (n=15,12,10)Bodily Pain: Month 24 (n=16,13,12)General Health: Month 12 (n=12,13,9)General Health: Month 18 (n=15,12,10)General Health: Month 24 (n=16,13,12)Vitality: Month 12 (n=13,13,9)Vitality: Month 18 (n=15,12,10)Vitality: Month 24 (n=16,13,12)Social Function: Month 12 (n=13,13,9)Social Function: Month 18 (n=15,12,10)Social Function: Month 24 (n=16,13,12)Emotional: Month 12 (n=13,13,9)Emotional: Month 18 (n=15,12,10)Emotional: Month 24 (n=16,13,12)Mental Health: Month 12 (n=13,13,9)Mental Health: Month 18 (n=15,12,10)Mental Health: Month 24 (n=16,13,12)TR Scale Score: Month 12 (n=13,13,9)TR Scale Score: Month 18 (n=15,12,10)TR Scale Score: Month 24 (n=16,13,12)
Tacrolimus53.4953.1650.8449.6552.0148.1253.1953.5353.0257.1852.5449.5459.7853.5554.1448.9649.5951.3649.2751.6447.6354.0549.2151.311.231.532.00
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID47.8250.2952.7051.8550.2653.6954.2554.3250.5752.9650.1054.3355.6457.4459.5546.4850.5852.2749.5650.6352.1851.7154.6656.191.231.671.62
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID47.5644.4247.3942.5746.1251.4550.7052.6451.5147.8646.6748.1458.6153.7550.9650.4350.4951.0348.5348.4952.5252.3549.0250.501.331.702.33

[back to top]

Serum Triglyceride Levels by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Month 9 (n=18,14,12)Month 12 (n=16,14,12)Month 15 (n=16,14,12)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=15,14,9)Month 42 (n=15,14,9)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,13,10)Month 66 (n=12,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,12,8)Month 78 (n=0,12,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,7)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-Up (n=6,12,8)
Tacrolimus129.44129.19123.56123.44149.71131.07142.00136.60144.67150.14139.38143.42138.33NANANANA130.67
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID205.07181.86158.93153.79146.50147.71147.14195.71155.07158.43125.23140.00118.33104.42127.17113.75119.64134.50
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID194.00173.00200.50173.08161.33162.30169.11141.22150.70170.90161.10145.30188.00172.38199.75206.29180.17191.88

[back to top]

Ratio of Serum LDL Level to HDL Level by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Month 9 (n=18,12,11)Month 12 (n=16,14,12)Month 15 (n=16,14,11)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=15,14,9)Month 42 (n=15,13,9)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,13,10)Month 60 (n=13,13,10)Month 66 (n=12,13,10)Month 72 (n=9,12,8)Month 78 (n=0,12,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,7)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-up (n=6,12,8)
Tacrolimus2.092.141.971.982.042.091.932.062.272.482.452.342.32NANANANA2.09
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID2.422.242.071.741.781.761.751.851.991.921.861.961.661.721.801.741.561.91
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID2.172.312.112.102.252.362.031.822.071.921.921.882.462.302.582.041.983.03

[back to top]

Ratio of Total Serum Cholesterol Level to HDL Level by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Month 9 (n=18,14,12)Month 12 (n=16,14,12)Month 15 (n=16,14,12)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=15,14,9)Month 42 (n=15,14,9)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,13,10)Month 66 (n=12,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,12,8)Month 78 (n=0,12,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,7)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-Up (n=6,12,8)
Tacrolimus3.623.723.483.503.693.703.543.633.954.174.123.993.97NANANANA3.57
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID4.093.923.663.323.353.303.353.853.593.523.323.513.053.063.223.142.973.45
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID4.084.034.083.883.974.033.683.353.763.643.593.504.304.064.503.913.724.95

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure by Visit

Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with treatment failure by time to treatment failure within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Treatment failure was defined as the first occurrence of BPAR, death, graft loss or premature discontinuation of trial medication for any reason. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 (n=18,14,13)Month 1 (n=17,14,13)Month 3 (n=17,14,11)Month 6 (n=17,14,11)Month 9 (n=16,14,11)Month 12 (n=16,14,10)Month 15 (n=16,14,10)Month 18 (n=16,14,10)Month 24 (n=15,14,10)Month 30 (n=14,14,9)Month 36 (n=14,14,8)Month 42 (n=14,14,8)Month 48 (n=13,14,8)Month 54 (n=13,14,8)Month 60 (n=12,14,8)Month 66 (n=11,14,8)Month 72 (n=5,13,6)Month 78 (n=0,13,6)Month 84 (n=0,13,6)Month 90 (n=0,12,6)Month 96 (n=0,12,6)
Tacrolimus0.005.565.565.5611.1111.1111.1111.1116.6722.2222.2222.2227.7827.7833.3338.8950.00NANANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.007.147.147.1414.2914.29
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID0.000.0015.3815.3815.3823.0823.0823.0823.0830.7738.4638.4638.4638.4638.4638.4653.8553.8553.8553.8553.85

[back to top]

Reciprocal of Serum Creatinine

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
InterventiondL/mg (Mean)
Month 9 (n=18,14,12)Month 12 (n=16,14,12)Month 15 (n=16,14,12)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=15,14,9)Month 42 (n=15,14,9)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,13,10)Month 66 (n=12,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,13,8)Month 78 (n=0,13,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,7)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-Up (n=6,12,8)
Tacrolimus0.830.780.850.890.920.950.960.920.910.910.941.050.94NANANANA0.61
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID0.880.880.910.900.930.960.960.970.980.960.970.950.950.950.940.910.900.91
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID0.830.800.820.810.830.830.780.870.840.810.870.840.790.870.880.880.920.80

[back to top]

Serum Creatinine Levels

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Month 9 (n=18,14,12)Month 12 (n=16,14,12)Month 15 (n=16,14,12)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=15,14,9)Month 42 (n=15,14,9)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,13,10)Month 66 (n=12,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,13,8)Month 78 (n=0,13,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,7)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-Up (n=6,12,8)
Tacrolimus1.261.341.241.181.151.141.181.191.231.381.171.121.12NANANANA2.35
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID1.191.211.131.151.111.061.081.091.081.101.121.141.091.091.101.161.151.16
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID1.281.331.281.291.231.241.331.171.201.251.161.241.291.161.151.161.101.50

[back to top]

End Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist (ESRD-SCL) Transplanation Module Scores by Visit and Scale

"ESRD-SCL: 43-item, disease-specific, self-administered questionnaire. Participants' rated question At the moment, how much do you suffer? for each item on 5-point scale, ranged from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Consisted of 6 subscales: cardiac and renal dysfunction (Range, 0-28), increased growth of gum and hair (Range, 0-20), limited cognitive capacity (Range, 0-32), limited physical capacity (Range, 0-40), side effects (SEs) of corticosteroids (Range, 0-20), transplantation associated psychological distress (TAPD; Range, 0-32); higher scores=greater dysfunction for each subscale. Total score: 0-172, higher scores=greater dysfunction." (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 12, 18, and 24

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Limited Physical: Month 12 (n = 13, 12, 8)Limited Physical: Month 18 (n = 15, 12, 10)Limited Physical: Month 24 (n = 16, 13, 11)Limited Cognitive: Month 12 (n = 13, 12, 8)Limited Cognitive: Month 18 (n = 15, 12, 10)Limited Cognitive: Month 24 (n = 16, 13, 11)Cardiac / Renal Dysfunc: Month 12 (n = 13, 13, 8)Cardiac / Renal Dysfunc: Month 18 (n = 14, 12, 9)Cardiac / Renal Dysfunc: Month 24 (n = 15, 13, 11)Side effects Corticosteroids: Month 12 (n=13,13,8)Side effects Corticosteroids: Month18 (n=14,12,10)Side effects Corticosteroids: Month24 (n=15,13,11)Increased growth gum/hair: Month 12 (n=13,13,4)Increased growth gum/hair: Month 18 (n=15,12,10)Increased growth gum/hair: Month 24 (n=16,13,11)Transplant-assoc psycho distress:Mnth12(n=13,12,8)Transplant-assoc psychodistress:Mnth18(n=15,12,10)Transplant-assoc psychodistress:Mnth24(n=16,13,11)Global Score: Month 12 (n = 13, 12, 8)Global Score: Month 18 (n = 15, 12, 10)Global Score: Month 24 (n = 16, 13, 11)
Tacrolimus0.220.530.600.410.630.650.180.250.330.290.390.530.170.170.410.400.700.770.280.500.57
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID0.370.410.440.450.420.570.270.300.310.570.450.260.150.230.280.500.420.450.390.380.40
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID0.290.460.550.300.290.480.180.220.340.700.580.690.080.140.110.480.470.570.330.360.47

[back to top]

Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) Deooxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Levels Determined Using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) by Visit

Calculated as number of copies per 500 mg DNA. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

,,
Interventionnumber of copies/500 mg DNA (Mean)
Month 9 (n=17,14,12)Month 12 (n=17,14,12)Month 15 (n=17,14,12)Month 18 (n=17,13,12)Month 24 (n=15,13,12)Month 30 (n=13,14,10)Month 36 (n=15,14,8)Month 42 (n=14,12,9)Month 48 (n=15,9,6)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,13,10)Month 66 (n=10,13,9)Month 72 (n=9,12,8)Month 78 (n=0,12,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,7)Month 96 (n=0,9,6)
Tacrolimus0.410.125.470.590.002.151.200.570.070.640.310.401.11NANANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID1.004.076.7121.9210.3813.578.6415.5017.0013.8611.4617.3811.0810.081.082.925.67
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID3.178.4218.4221.5010.8323.8042.6317.0011.506.3010.2031.1119.2517.6310.889.2917.67

[back to top]

Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Ordered Categorical Severity of First BPCAN

Ordered categorical severity of first BPCAN was classified according to the Banff Classification. Grade I: mild, grade II: moderate and grade III: severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy/loss. (Racusen et al: The Banff classification, 1999). (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 12: Grade IMonth 12: Grade IIMonth 12: Grade IIIMonth 18: Grade IMonth 18: Grade IIMonth 18: Grade IIIMonth 24: Grade IMonth 24: Grade IIMonth 24: Grade IIIMonth 36: Grade IMonth 36: Grade IIMonth 36: Grade IIIMonth 48: Grade IMonth 48: Grade IIMonth 48: Grade IIIMonth 60: Grade IMonth 60: Grade IIMonth 60: Grade IIIMonth 72: Grade IMonth 72: Grade IIMonth 72: Grade IIIMonth 84: Grade IMonth 84: Grade IIMonth 84: Grade IIIMonth 96: Grade IMonth 96: Grade IIMonth 96: Grade III
Tacrolimus000000000000000000000NANANANANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID000000000000000000000000000
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID00007.7007.7007.7007.7007.7007.7007.7007.70

[back to top]

Absolute Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 8+, CD19+, CD4+, and CD56+ Flouresence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) Counts (Cells/uL) by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 12 and 24

,,
Interventioncells/uL (Mean)
CD8+: Month 12CD8+: Month 24CD19+: Month 12CD19+: Month 24CD4+: Month 12CD4+: Month 24CD56+: Month 12CD56+: Month 24
Tacrolimus284.67318.20197.53144.47612.80599.13152.67135.27
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID207.43224.36169.64125.86634.86462.0050.1477.86
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID232.33238.08127.4285.08565.00457.8335.5859.17

[back to top]

Cumulative Percentage of Participants With a First Antibody-Mediated Rejection or First BPAR

Antibody-mediated rejection is defined as Category 2 and BPAR is defined as Category 4 of the Banff Classification, based on the assessment of the renal allograft biopsy by a central, blinded pathologist. Acute humoral rejection was categorized as Grades I, II, III and acute/active cellular rejection was categorized as Grades IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and III. Only participants with first BPAR were included. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 12 Antibody-mediated rejection (n=18,14,13)Month 18 Antibody-mediated rejection (n=18,14,13)Month 24 Antibody-mediated rejection (n=18,14,13)Month 36 Antibody-mediated rejection (n=18,14,13)Month 48 Antibody-mediated rejection (n=18,14,13)Month 60 Antibody-mediated rejection (n=18,14,13)Month 72 Antibody-mediated rejection (n=18,14,13)Month 84 Antibody-mediated rejection (n=18,14,13)Month 96 Antibody-mediated rejection (n=18,14,13)Follow-up Antibody-mediated rejection (n=18,14,13)Month 12 BPAR (n=18,14,13)Month 18 BPAR (n=18,14,13)Month 24 BPAR (n=18,14,13)Month 36 BPAR (n=18,14,13)Month 48 BPAR (n=18,14,13)Month 60 BPAR (n=18,14,13)Month 72 BPAR (n=18,14,13)Month 84 BPAR (n=18,14,13)Month 96 BPAR (n=18,14,13)Follow-up BPAR (n=18,14,13)
Tacrolimus00000000000000000000
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID00000000000000000000
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID00000000000000000000

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SF-36 v2 Subscale Scores by Visit

"SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as PCS and MCS. Total of 11 variables were analyzed (8 subscales, 2 composite subscales and Question 2 how would you rate your health in general now? (range 1= better, 5= worst). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Negative change from baseline represented improvement." (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 12, 18, and 24

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Phys Func: Month 12 (n=13,12,9)Phys Func: Month 18 (n=13,10,8)Phys Func: Month 24 (n=13,11,10)Physical: Month 12 (n=13,12,9)Physical: Month 18 (n=13,10,8)Physical: Month 24 (n=13,11,10)Bodily Pain: Month 12 (n=13,12,9)Bodily Pain: Month 18 (n=13,10,8)Bodily Pain: Month 24 (n=13,11,10)General Health: Month 12 (n=12,11,9)General Health: Month 18 (n=13,9,8)General Health: Month 24 (n=13,10,10)Vitality: Month 12 (n=13,12,9)Vitality: Month 18 (n=13,10,8)Vitality: Month 24 (n=13,11,8)Social Function: Month 12 (n=13,12,9)Social Function: Month 18 (n=13,10,8)Social Function: Month 24 (n=13,11,10)Emotional: Month 12 (n=13,12,9)Emotional: Month 18 (n=13,10,8)Emotional: Month 24 (n=13,11,10)Mental Health: Month 12 (n=13,12,9)Mental Health: Month 18 (n=13,10,8)Mental Health: Month 24 (n=13,11,10)TR Scale Score: Month 12 (n=13,12,9)TR Scale Score: Month 18 (n=13,10,8)TR Scale Score: Month 24 (n=13,11,10)
Tacrolimus8.829.908.4813.7715.6012.301.470.832.5611.738.898.0611.057.148.904.144.557.0310.199.324.662.98-1.281.70-1.31-1.15-0.92
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID0.514.503.9112.929.5413.236.878.085.576.756.949.119.2311.6715.517.6211.8311.737.2611.746.544.628.0310.58-1.83-1.10-1.45
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID5.232.564.3011.6712.5317.18-0.83-0.31-1.253.60-1.291.8316.3010.857.1811.958.749.6815.1413.2516.665.540.002.22-1.78-1.13-0.70

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SF-36 v2 MCS and PCS Scores by Visit and Scale

"SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as PCS and MCS. Total of 11 variables were analyzed (8 subscales, 2 composite subscales and Question 2 how would you rate your health in general now? (range 1= better, 5= worst). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Negative change from baseline represented improvement." (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 12, 18, and 24

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
PCS: Month 12 (n=12,11,9)PCS: Month 18 (n=13,9,8)PCS: Month 24 (n=13,10,10)MCS: Month 12 (n=12,11,9)MCS: Month 18 (n=13,9,8)MCS: Month 24 (n=13,10,10)
Tacrolimus9.6110.829.676.861.912.99
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID6.235.657.095.039.5410.05
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID3.202.764.3613.708.579.59

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in ESRD-SCL Transplantation Module Scores by Visit and Scale

"ESRD-SCL: 43-item, disease-specific, self-administered questionnaire. Participants' rated question At the moment, how much do you suffer? for each item on 5-point scale, ranged from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Consisted of 6 subscales: cardiac and renal dysfunction (Range, 0-28), increased growth of gum and hair (Range, 0-20), limited cognitive capacity (Range, 0-32), limited physical capacity (Range, 0-40), SEs of corticosteroids (Range, 0-20),TAPD (Range, 0-32); higher scores=greater dysfunction for each subscale. Total score: 0-172, higher scores=greater dysfunction." (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 12, 18, and 24

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Limited Physical: Month 12 (n = 13, 10, 8)Limited Physical: Month 18 (n = 13, 9, 8)Limited Physical: Month 24 (n = 13, 10, 9)Limited Cognitive: Month 12 (n = 13, 10, 8)Limited Cognitive: Month 18 (n = 13, 9, 8)Limited Cognitive: Month 24 (n = 13, 10, 9)Cardiac / Renal Dysfunc: Month 12 (n = 13, 9, 8)Cardiac / Renal Dysfunc: Month 18 (n = 12, 8, 7)Cardiac / Renal Dysfunc: Month 24 (n = 13, 9, 9)Side effects Corticosteroids: Month 12(n=13, 9, 8)Side effects Corticosteroids: Month 18 (n=12,8,8)Side effects Corticosteroids: Month 24 (n=13,10,9)Increased growth gum/hair: Month 12 (n=13,10,8)Increased growth gum/hair: Month 18 (n=13,9,8)Increased growth gum/hair: Month 24 (n=13,10,9)Transplant-assoc psychodistress: Mnth12(n=13,10,8)Transplant-assoc psychodistress: Mnth18(n=13,9,8)Transplant-assoc psychodistress: Mnth24(n=13,10,9)Global Score: Month 12 (n = 13, 10, 8)Global Score: Month 18 (n = 13, 9, 8)Global Score: Month 24 (n = 13, 10, 9)
Tacrolimus-0.34-0.20-0.16-0.37-0.22-0.25-0.48-0.49-0.46-0.25-0.40-0.250.060.040.29-0.49-0.28-0.30-0.34-0.21-0.21
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID-0.34-0.36-0.23-0.37-0.39-0.21-0.51-0.50-0.41-0.02-0.23-0.31-0.06-0.040.10-0.57-0.57-0.62-0.36-0.40-0.30
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID-0.53-0.30-0.32-0.36-0.39-0.26-0.52-0.45-0.330.180.030.13-0.08-0.03-0.07-0.61-0.48-0.61-0.37-0.31-0.28

[back to top]

Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation

GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was calculated using MDRD equation. GFR by MDRD equation = 170 * (serum creatinine [in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)])^(-0.999) * (age in years)^(-0.176) * (0.762 if female) * (1.18 if black) * (blood urea nitrogen [BUN] concentration [mg/dL])^(-0.170) * (serum albumin concentration [in grams per dL (g/dL)])^(0.318). A normal GFR is >90 milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meters (mL/min/1.73 m^2), although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m^2 indicated kidney failure. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Month 9 (n=18,14,12)Month 12 (n=16,14,12)Month 15 (n=16,14,12)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=15,14,9)Month 42 (n=15,14,9)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,13,10)Month 66 (n=12,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,13,8)Month 78 (n=0,13,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,7)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-up (n=6,12,8)
Tacrolimus67.0664.9766.2272.8177.0579.8979.8777.9576.2378.1082.8689.8076.61NANANANA42.29
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID65.9965.1667.8666.9168.4571.5570.4470.7770.3669.9870.1069.6967.8969.9569.2465.2864.9463.25
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID67.0563.5065.7164.7166.2964.0461.7265.2565.5061.9967.3064.9861.9668.6468.7769.4670.3360.41

[back to top]

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Levels by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 12, 24, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96 and Follow-up (Month 98)

,,
Intervention% HbA1c (Mean)
Month 12 (n=16,14,12)Month 24 (n=16,14,12)Month 36 (n=15,14,8)Month 42 (n=15,14,9)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=12,12,10)Month 66 (n=12,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,12,8)Month 78 (n=12,8)Month 84 (n=12,8)Month 90 (n=12,7)Month 96 (n=11,6)Follow-up (n=3,13,6)
Tacrolimus5.655.635.755.816.036.396.186.136.31NANANANA6.50
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID6.847.127.197.407.257.257.036.996.937.276.666.386.326.65
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID6.026.286.566.686.256.436.486.526.296.435.996.546.777.22

[back to top]

Calculated GFR Using the Nankivell Equation (mL/Min)

GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was measured directly or estimated using established formulas. GFR was estimated by creatinine clearance (CLcr; in mL/min]) using Nankivell equation. CLcr by Nankivell equation= (6.7 per serum creatinine [in millimoles per liter (mmol/L)]) plus (0.25*body weight [in kilograms (kg)]) minus (0.5*serum urea [mmol/dL, where 1 mg/dL BUN=0.36 mmol/L urea]) minus (100 per height [in meters] square) plus (35 for male/25 for female). A normal GFR is >90 mL/min, although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min indicated kidney failure. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
InterventionmL/min (Mean)
Month 9 (n=18,14,12)Month 12 (n=16,14,12)Month 15 (n=16,14,12)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=15,14,9)Month 42 (n=15,14,9)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,13,10)Month 66 (n=12,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,13,8)Month 78 (n=0,13,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,7)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-Up (n=6,12,8)
Tacrolimus77.9873.6480.9282.7784.9388.6189.0886.9585.5988.0893.0198.7290.60NANANANA52.35
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID80.1580.0283.0681.7282.6286.3586.0586.0786.4785.3585.7584.2683.8083.9484.2181.0979.4681.06
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID81.3979.3181.1880.0381.6679.8776.3881.8982.0679.9885.3682.2181.4687.4488.5388.9188.2076.41

[back to top]

Calculated GFR Using Cockcroft-Gault Equation (mL/Min)

GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was calculated using Cockcroft-Gault equation. GFR by Cockcroft-Gault equation= body weight (kg)*(140 minus age in years) divided by (72*serum creatinine [mg/dL]). For females value obtained was multiplied by 0.85. A normal GFR is >90 mL/min, although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min indicated kidney failure. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
InterventionmL/min (Mean)
Month 9 (n=18,14,12)Month 12 (n=16,14,12)Month 15 (n=16,14,12)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=15,14,9)Month 42 (n=15,14,9)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,13,10)Month 66 (n=12,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,13,8)Month 78 (n=0,13,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,7)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-Up (n=6,12,8)
Tacrolimus92.8287.0598.3998.68100.46102.29101.92102.79100.77106.65113.73118.60113.23NANANANA63.95
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID86.7487.2992.6990.6189.6295.7994.6792.1392.7889.9687.8986.7486.0085.1085.5480.7379.0282.26
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID92.3590.3692.7991.3194.6788.1986.3291.9693.2391.9098.9494.8093.33100.93102.36103.59100.8989.79

[back to top]

High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Levels by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Month 9 (n=18,14,12)Month 12 (n=16,14,12)Month 15 (n=16,14,12)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=15,14,9)Month 42 (n=15,14,9)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,13,10)Month 66 (n=12,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,12,8)Month 78 (n=0,12,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,7)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-Up (n=6,12,8)
Tacrolimus54.8351.8151.3152.6753.7651.2153.1352.2749.6746.6445.2349.7546.67NANANANA55.67
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID59.9362.0759.7959.2960.0759.2955.1456.5757.7160.0758.2356.5762.6765.5863.0061.1765.3656.25
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID52.5856.0053.0852.9255.1750.4056.4457.3350.1052.8058.3051.4048.3849.3846.3849.5752.0045.38

[back to top]

BK Virus (BKV) DNA Levels Determined Using PCR by Visit

Calculated as number of copies per PCR. Per protocol, BKV DNA PCR was performed on tofacitinib-treated participants only. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,
Interventionnumber of copies/PCR (Mean)
Month 9 (n=14,12)Month 12 (n=13,10)Month 15 (n=13,12)Month 18 (n=7,8)Month 24 (n=2,1)Month 30 (n=0,1)Month 36 (n=5,4)Month 42 (n=11,7)Month 48 (n=9,6)Month 54 (n=13,10)Month 60 (n=13,7)Month 66 (n=13,8)Month 72 (n=10,7)Month 78 (n=9,7)Month 84 (n=10,7)Month 90 (n=9,4)Month 96 (n=9,3)Follow-up (n=3,2)
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID1.292.232.850.140.00NA15.800.648.334.5415.856.151.000.560.600.561.110.00
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID1.580.100.750.380.000.006.751.863.331.400.860.000.140.140.140.000.000.50

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Hypercholesterolemia

Hypercholesterolemia was defined as cholesterol levels >240 mg/dL or 6.2 mmol/L. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 9 (n=18,14,13)Month 12 (n=18,14,12)Month 15 (n=18,14,12)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=15,14,11)Month 36 (n=15,14,11)Month 42 (n=15,14,10)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,14,10)Month 66 (n=12,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,13,8)Month 78 (n=0,13,8)Month 84 (n=0,13,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,8)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-Up (n=7,14,11)
Tacrolimus11.15.65.65.611.86.76.76.720.014.37.716.711.1NANANANA14.3
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID35.728.635.77.17.17.1021.47.121.4014.315.47.77.78.39.17.1
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID15.48.308.316.79.19.1010.010.020.0012.512.50009.1

[back to top]

Fasting Serum Glucose Levels (mg/dL) by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Month 9 (n=18,14,10)Month 12 (n=17,14,12)Month 15 (n=17,13,11)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=15,14,9)Month 42 (n=15,14,9)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=12,14,10)Month 60 (n=12,12,10)Month 66 (n=10,13,10)Month 72 (n=9,13,7)Month 78 (n=0,12,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,6)Month 90 (n=0,11,7)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-up (n=6,10,7)
Tacrolimus96.89103.0095.4194.72113.71102.50108.20104.47112.93126.58107.08111.90100.44NANANANA112.17
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID115.14133.79128.08117.93115.64137.86128.00113.71123.29119.21136.17143.77117.69131.67139.50114.55154.64126.30
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID97.90102.7599.18112.50122.25140.00143.33109.5698.00116.30111.70112.90127.4398.50112.5096.43100.3398.86

[back to top]

HOMA Insulin Resistance (IR) by Visit

HOMA-IR=fasting serum insulin*fasting serum glucose/22.5. Measurement only performed in participants who were non-diabetic prior to kidney transplantation and who do not require treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti diabetic agents, and/or insulin prior to the time of measurement. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 12 and 24

,,
InterventionHOMA-IR (Mean)
Month 12 (n=8,6,5)Month 24 (n=9,6,5)
Tacrolimus2.552.67
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID2.249.01
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID2.542.68

[back to top]

Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA)-%B by Visit

HOMA-%B = (20 times [*] fasting serum insulin) divided by (/) (fasting serum glucose minus [-] 3.5). HOMA-%B was only performed in participants who were non-diabetic prior to kidney transplantation and who did not require treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin prior to the time of measurements. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 12 and 24

,,
Intervention%B (Mean)
Month 12 (n=8,6,5)Month 24 (n=9,6,5)
Tacrolimus204.67224.75
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID142.23138.10
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID194.65165.38

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants Surviving by Visit

Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants surviving by time to event (death) within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 (n=18,14,13)Month 1 (n=18,14,13)Month 3 (n=18,14,13)Month 6 (n=18,14,13)Month 9 (n=18,14,13)Month 12 (n=18,14,13)Month 15 (n=18,14,13)Month 18 (n=17,14,13)Month 24 (n=17,14,13)Month 30 (n=15,14,12)Month 36 (n=15,14,12)Month 42 (n=15,14,11)Month 48 (n=14,14,11)Month 54 (n=14,14,11)Month 60 (n=13,14,11)Month 66 (n=13,14,10)Month 72 (n=6,14,9)Month 78 (n=0,14,8)Month 84 (n=0,13,8)Month 90 (n=0,13,8)Month 96 (n=0,12,7)
Tacrolimus100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00NANANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.0092.8692.8692.86
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.0090.0090.0090.0090.0090.00

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Infections by Visit

Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with clinically significant infections by time to first clinically significant infection within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 (n=18,14,13)Month 1 (n=16,14,12)Month 3 (n=16,13,7)Month 6 (n=14,12,4)Month 9 (n=13,11,4)Month 12 (n=12,9,4)Month 15 (n=11,8,3)Month 18 (n=10,8,3)Month 24 (n=10,8,3)Month 30 (n=9,8,3)Month 36 (n=8,8,3)Month 42 (n=8,8,2)Month 48 (n=7,8,2)Month 54 (n=7,8,2)Month 60 (n=7,8,2)Month 66 (n=7,8,2)Month 72 (n=4,8,2)Month 84 (n=0,8,2)Month 90 (n=0,8,2)Month 96 (n=0,8,2)
Tacrolimus0.0011.1111.1122.2227.7833.3338.8938.8938.8938.8945.6845.6845.6845.6845.6845.6845.68NANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID0.000.007.1414.2921.4335.7142.8642.8642.8642.8642.8642.8642.8642.8642.8642.8642.8642.8642.8642.86
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID0.007.6946.1569.2369.2369.2376.9276.9276.9276.9276.9276.9276.9276.9276.9276.9276.9276.9276.9276.92

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease by Visit

Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with CMV disease within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. CMV disease was an adverse event associated with the preferred term 'CMV infection'. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 (n=18,14,13)Month 1 (n=18,14,13)Month 3 (n=18,14,12)Month 6 (n=18,14,12)Month 9 (n=18,13,12)Month 12 (n=18,13,12)Month 15 (n=17,13,12)Month 18 (n=16,13,12)Month 24 (n=16,13,12)Month 30 (n=14,13,11)Month 36 (n=14,13,11)Month 42 (n=14,13,10)Month 48 (n=13,13,10)Month 54 (n=13,13,10)Month 60 (n=12,13,10)Month 66 (n=12,13,9)Month 72 (n=5,13,8)Month 78 (n=0,13,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,8)Month 96 (n=0,12,7)
Tacrolimus0.000.000.000.000.000.005.565.565.565.565.565.565.565.565.565.565.56NANANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID0.000.000.000.007.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.14
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID0.000.007.697.697.697.697.697.697.697.697.697.697.697.697.697.697.697.697.697.697.69

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure by Visit

Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with efficacy failure by time to first efficacy failure within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Efficacy failure was defined as first occurrence of BPAR, death, or graft loss. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 (n=18,14,13)Month 1 (n=17,14,13)Month 3 (n=17,14,11)Month 6 (n=17,14,11)Month 9 (n=16,14,11)Month 12 (n=16,14,11)Month 15 (n=16,14,11)Month 18 (n=16,14,11)Month 24 (n=16,14,11)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=14,14,10)Month 42 (n=14,14,9)Month 48 (n=13,14,9)Month 54 (n=13,14,9)Month 60 (n=12,14,9)Month 66 (n=12,14,8)Month 72 (n=5,14,7)Month 78 (n=0,14,6)Month 84 (n=0,13,6)Month 90 (n=0,13,6)Month 96 (n=0,12,6)
Tacrolimus0.005.565.565.5611.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.11NANANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.007.147.147.14
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID0.000.0015.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3825.9625.9625.9625.9625.96

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With First Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) by Visit

Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with first BPAR by time to first BPAR within 96 months post-transplant. BPAR was defined as acute/active cellular rejection (Category 4 of the Banff Classification), based on the assessment of the renal allograft biopsy by a central, blinded pathologist. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 (n=18,14,13)Month 1 (n=17,14,13)Month 3 (n=17,14,11)Month 6 (n=17,14,11)Month 9 (n=16,14,11)Month 12 (n=16,14,11)Month 15 (n=16,14,11)Month 18 (n=16,14,11)Month 24 (n=16,14,11)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=14,14,10)Month 42 (n=14,14,9)Month 48 (n=13,14,9)Month 54 (n=13,14,9)Month 60 (n=12,14,9)Month 66 (n=12,14,8)Month 72 (n=5,14,7)Month 78 (n=0,14,6)Month 84 (n=0,13,6)Month 90 (n=0,13,6)
Tacrolimus0.005.565.565.5611.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.11NANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID0.000.0015.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.38

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With First Biopsy-Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (BPCAN) by Visit

Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with first BPCAN by time to first BPCAN within 96 months post-transplant. BPCAN was defined as chronic allograft nephropathy (Category 5 of the Banff Classification), based on the assessment of the renal allograft biopsy by a central, blinded pathologist. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Includes BPCAN diagnosed on biopsies done for cause and ready by the central pathologist. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 (n=18,14,13)Month 1 (n=18,14,13)Month 3 (n=18,14,12)Month 6 (n=18,14,12)Month 9 (n=18,14,12)Month 12 (n=18,14,12)Month 15 (n=18,14,12)Month 18 (n=17,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,11)Month 30 (n=15,14,10)Moth 36 (n=15,14,10)Month 42 (n=15,14,9)Month 48 (n=14,14,9)Month 54 (n=14,14,9)Month 60 (n=13,14,9)Month 66 (n=13,14,8)Month 72 (n=6,14,7)Month 78 (n=0,14,6)Month 84 (n=0,13,6)Month 90 (n=0,13,6)Month 96 (n=0,12,6)
Tacrolimus0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00NANANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID0.000.007.697.697.697.697.697.6915.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.38

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Graft Survival by Visit

Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with graft survival by time to graft loss within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Graft loss was defined as graft nephrectomy, retransplantation, return to dialysis for ≥6 consecutive weeks, or death. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 (n=18,14,13)Month 1 (n=18,14,13)Month 3 (n=18,14,13)Month 6 (n=18,14,13)Month 9 (n=18,14,13)Month 12 (n=18,14,13)Month 15 (n=18,14,13)Month 18 (n=17,14,13)Month 24 (n=17,14,13)Month 30 (n=15,14,12)Month 36 (n=15,14,12)Month 42 (n=15,14,11)Month 48 (n=14,14,11)Month 54 (n=14,14,11)Month 60 (n=13,14,11)Month 66 (n=13,14,10)Month 72 (n=6,14,9)Month 78 (n=0,14,8)Month 84 (n=0,13,8)Month 90 (n=0,13,8)Month 96 (n=0,12,7)
Tacrolimus100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00NANANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.0092.8692.8692.86
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.0090.0090.0090.0090.0090.00

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus, Definition 1 (NODM-1) by Visit

Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to NODM-1 within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. NODM-1 was defined as an event experienced by participants who were non-diabetic prior to transplantation and required treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin for greater than or equal to (≥)30 days. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 1 (n=17,8,9)Month 3 (n=17,8,9)Month 6 (n=17,8,9)Month 9 (n=17,8,9)Month 12 (n=17,8,9)Month 15 (n=17,8,9)Month 18 (n=16,8,9)Month 24 (n=15,8,9)Month 30 (n=13,8,8)Month 36 (n=13,8,8)Month 42 (n=13,8,8)Month 48 (n=12,8,8)Month 54 (n=12,8,8)Month 60 (n=11,8,8)Month 66 (n=11,8,7)Month 72 (n=6,8,7)Month 78 (n=0,8,6)Month 84 (n=0,8,6)Month 90 (n=0,8,6)Month 96 (n=0,8,6)
Tacrolimus0.000.000.000.000.000.000.006.256.256.256.256.256.256.256.256.25NANANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With NODM, Definition 2 (NODM-2) by Visit

Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with NODM-2 by time to NODM-2 within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. NODM-2 was defined as an event experienced by a transplanted subject who meets any of the following criteria: (a) NODM-1; or (b) Symptoms of diabetes plus 2 casual serum glucose levels ≥200 mg/dL separated by at least approximately 24 hours. Casual was defined as any time of day without regard to time since last meal; or (c) Fasting serum glucose ≥126 mg/dL on 2 different occasions separated by at least approximately 24 hours. Fasting was defined as no caloric intake for at least 8 hours; or (d) 2-hour serum glucose ≥200 mg/dL during an OGTT (Oral Glucose Tolerance Test). (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 (n=17,8,9)Month 1 (n=17,8,9)Month 3 (n=17,8,9)Month 6 (n=17,8,9)Month 9 (n=16,7,9)Month 12 (n=16,7,9)Month 15 (n=16,7,9)Month 18 (n=15,7,9)Month 24 (n=15,7,9)Month 30 (n=13,7,7)Month 36 (n=13,7,7)Month 42 (n=13,7,7)Month 48 (n=12,7,7)Month 54 (n=12,7,7)Month 60 (n=11,7,7)Month 66 (n=11,7,6)Month 72 (n=6,7,6)Month 78 (n=0,7,5)Month 84 (n=0,7,5)Month 90 (n=0,7,5)Month 96 (n=0,7,5)
Tacrolimus0.000.000.000.005.885.885.885.885.885.885.885.885.885.885.885.8814.44NANANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID0.000.000.000.0012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.50
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.0012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.5012.50

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Rejection by Visit

Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with rejection by time to rejection within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Rejection was defined as first occurrence of BPAR, antibody-mediated rejection or suspicious for acute rejection. This included biopsies read by the central pathologist. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 (n=18,14,13)Month 1 (n=17,13,13)Month 3 (n=17,13,11)Month 6 (n=17,13,11)Month 9 (n=16,13,11)Month 12 (n=16,13,11)Month 15 (n=16,13,11)Month 18 (n=16,13,11)Month 24 (n=16,13,11)Month 30 (n=14,13,10)Month 36 (n=14,13,10)Month 42 (n=14,13,9)Month 48 (n=13,13,9)Month 54 (n=13,13,9)Month 60 (n=12,13,9)Month 66 (n=12,13,8)Month 72 (n=5,13,6)Month 78 (n=0,13,6)Month 84 (n=0,12,6)Month 90 (n=0,12,6)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)
Tacrolimus0.005.565.565.5611.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.11NANANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID0.007.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.147.14
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID0.000.0015.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3815.3827.4727.4727.4727.4727.47

[back to top]

Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Levels by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Month 9 (n=18,12,11)Month 12 (n=16,14,12)Month 15 (n=16,14,11)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=14,14,10)Month 36 (n=15,14,9)Month 42 (n=15,13,9)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,13,10)Month 60 (n=13,13,10)Month 66 (n=12,13,10)Month 72 (n=9,12,8)Month 78 (n=0,12,8)Month 84 (n=0,12,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,7)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-Up (n=6,12,8)
Tacrolimus107.11102.7595.1395.94101.8297.9394.20100.27110.13108.36105.62109.83102.89NANANANA110.00
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID138.83130.21117.2995.1499.2996.8690.2999.69107.07109.08101.00100.92100.00103.25103.92101.9293.82102.42
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID109.82119.42106.64104.42114.00115.50112.00102.1199.7096.5098.6091.90114.25111.13117.8899.0099.83129.38

[back to top]

Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU) Questionnaire

HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any number of events including visits to doctor or other healthcare professionals (HCP), non-medical practitioner, hospital ER treatment, hospitalizations, number of surgeries, diagnostic tests, and devices/aids used were reported. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 12, 18, and 24

,,
Interventionevents (Mean)
Doctor/HCP Visits: Month 12 (n=9,10,4)Doctor/HCP Visits: Month 18 (n=10,9,6)Doctor/HCP Visits: Month 24 (n=12,11,9)Other Test/Procedures: Month 12 (n=1,4,4)Other Test/Procedures: Month 18 (n=4,3,0)Other Test/Procedures: Month 24 (n=4,3,4)Previous Hospitalizations: Month 12 (n=1,1,2)Previous Hospitalizations: Month 18 (n=3,1,1)Previous Hospitalizations: Month 24 (n=3,3,1)Emergency Room Visits: Month 12 (n=1,1,2)Emergency Room Visits: Month 18 (n=3,3,1)Emergency Room Visits: Month 24 (n=4,2,2)
Tacrolimus3.17.25.11.02.53.82.01.31.01.01.31.0
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID2.76.42.52.02.01.31.01.01.01.01.01.0
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID6.35.85.02.3NA2.81.02.01.01.02.01.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Requiring Anti-Hypertensive Medication by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 9 (n=18,14,13)Month 12 (n=18,14,13)Month 15 (n=18,14,12)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=15,14,11)Month 36 (n=15,14,10)Month 42 (n=15,14,10)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,14,10)Month 66 (n=13,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,14,9)Month 78 (n=0,13,8)Month 84 (n=0,13,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,8)Month 96 (n=0,11,7)
Tacrolimus83.383.383.383.382.473.373.373.373.371.469.276.977.8NANANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID85.785.785.778.685.771.471.471.471.471.471.471.471.469.269.266.772.7
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID92.392.391.791.791.781.890.090.090.090.090.090.088.987.575.075.071.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Requiring Diabetes Agents (Oral Hypoglycemic Agents, Anti-Diabetic Agents, or Insulin) by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 9 (n=18,14,13)Month 12 (n=18,14,12)Month 15 (n=18,14,12)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=15,14,11)Month 36 (n=15,14,10)Month 42 (n=15,14,10)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,14,10)Month 66 (n=13,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,14,8)Month 78 (n=0,13,8)Month 84 (n=0,13,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,8)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)
Tacrolimus5.65.65.611.111.813.313.313.313.314.315.415.411.1NANANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID35.735.742.942.942.942.942.942.942.942.942.942.942.938.538.533.336.4
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID30.833.333.333.333.327.330.030.030.030.030.030.025.025.025.025.016.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Requiring Lipid-Lowering Agents by Visit

(NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 9 (n=18,14,13)Month 12 (n=18,14,13)Month 15 (n=18,14,12)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=15,14,11)Month 36 (n=15,14,11)Month 42 (n=15,14,10)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,14,10)Month 66 (n=13,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,14,9)Month 78 (n=0,13,8)Month 84 (n=0,13,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,8)Month 96 (n=0,12,6)
Tacrolimus38.944.444.444.447.146.746.746.746.742.938.546.244.4NANANANA
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID64.364.371.471.471.471.471.464.364.364.364.364.364.361.561.558.358.3
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID53.853.850.041.758.363.672.790.090.070.080.080.088.987.587.587.5100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With BKV DNA Determined Using PCR by Specific Cutoff Categories (in Number of Copies/PCR) and Visit

Cutoff categories for BKV DNA were 0-199 and ≥200 copies/PCR. Per protocol, BKV DNA PCR was performed on tofacitinib-treated participants only. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
0-199: Month 9 (n=14,12)0-199: Month 12 (n=13,10)0-199: Month 15 (n=13,12)0-199: Month 18 (n=7,8)0-199: Month 24 (n=2,1)0-199: Month 30 (n=0,1)0-199: Month 36 (n=5,4)0-199: Month 42 (n=11,7)0-199: Month 48 (n=9,6)0-199: Month 54 (n=13,10)0-199: Month 60 (n=13,7)0-199: Month 66 (n=13,8)0-199: Month 72 (n=10,7)0-199: Month 78 (n=9,7)0-199: Month 84 (n=10,7)0-199: Month 90 (n=9,4)0-199: Month 96 (n=9,3)0-199: Follow-up (n=3,2)≥200: Month 9 (n=14,12)≥200: Month 12 (n=13,10)≥200: Month 15 (n=13,12)≥200: Month 18 (n=7,8)≥200: Month 24 (n=2,1)≥200: Month 30 (n=0,1)≥200: Month 36 (n=5,4)≥200: Month 42 (n=11,7)≥200: Month 48 (n=9,6)≥200: Month 54 (n=13,10)≥200: Month 60 (n=13,7)≥200: Month 66 (n=13,8)≥200: Month 72 (n=10,7)≥200: Month 78 (n=9,7)≥200: Month 84 (n=10,7)≥200: Month 90 (n=9,4)≥200: Month 96 (n=9,3)≥200: Follow-up (n=3,2)
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID100.0100.0100.0100.0100.00100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0000000000000000000
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0000000000000000000

[back to top]

AUC of Serum Insulin (microU*h/mL) Measured During OGTT by Visit

The OGTT was performed only in participants who were non-diabetic prior to kidney transplantation and who did not require treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 12 and 24

,,
InterventionmicroU*h/mL (Mean)
Month 12 (n=10,6,6)Month 24 (n=8,6,5)
Tacrolimus85.0579.84
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID99.96130.63
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID153.46181.70

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With EBV DNA Determined Using PCR by Specific Cutoff Categories (in Number of Copies/PCR) and Visit

EBV DNA PCR categories included 0, 1-50, 51-100, 101-1000, and >1000 copies/PCR. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96 and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
0: Month 9 (n=17,14,12)0: Month 12 (n=17,14,12)0: Month 15 (n=17,14,12)0: Month 18 (n=17,13,12)0: Month 24 (n=15,13,12)0: Month 30 (n=13,14,10)0: Month 36 (n=15,14,8)0: Month 42 (n=14,12,9)0: Month 48 (n=15,9,6)0: Month 54 (n=14,14,10)0: Month 60 (n=13,13,10)0: Month 66 (n=10,13,9)0: Month 72 (n=9,12,8)0: Month 78 (n=0,12,8)0: Month 84 (n=0,12,8)0: Month 90 (n=0,12,7)0: Month 96 (n=0,9,6)0: Follow-up (n=2,4,4)1-50: Month 9 (n=17,14,12)1-50: Month 12 (n=17,14,12)1-50: Month 18 (n=17,13,12)1-50: Month 24 (n=15,13,12)1-50: Month 30 (n=13,14,10)1-50: Month 36 (n=15,14,8)1-50: Month 42 (n=14,12,9)1-50: Month 48 (n=15,9,6)1-50: Month 54 (n=14,14,10)1-50: Month 60 (n=13,13,10)1-50: Month 66 (n=10,13,9)1-50: Month 72 (n=9,12,8)1-50: Month 78 (n=0,12,8)1-50: Month 84 (n=0,12,8)1-50: Month 90 (n=0,12,7)1-50: Month 96 (n=0,9,6)1-50: Follow-up (n=2,4,4)51-100: Month 9 (n=17,14,12)51-100: Month 12 (n=17,14,12)51-100: Month 15 (n=17,14,12)51-100: Month 18 (n=17,13,12)51-100: Month 24 (n=15,13,12)51-100: Month 30 (n=13,14,10)51-100: Month 36 (n=15,14,8)51-100: Month 42 (n=14,12,9)51-100: Month 48 (n=15,9,6)51-100: Month 54 (n=14,14,10)51-100: Month 60 (n=13,13,10)51-100: Month 66 (n=10,13,9)51-100: Month 72 (n=9,12,8)51-100: Month 78 (n=0,12,8)51-100: Month 84 (n=0,12,8)51-100: Month 90 (n=0,12,7)51-100: Month 96 (n=0,9,6)51-100: Follow-up (n=2,4,4)101-1000: Month 9 (n=17,14,12)101-1000: Month 12 (n=17,14,12)101-1000: Month 15 (n=17,14,12)101-1000: Month 18 (n=17,13,12)101-1000: Month 24 (n=15,13,12)101-1000: Month 30 (n=13,14,10)101-1000: Month 36 (n=15,14,8)101-1000: Month 42 (n=14,12,9)101-1000: Month 48 (n=15,9,6)101-1000: Month 54 (n=14,14,10)101-1000: Month 60 (n=13,13,10)101-1000: Month 66 (n=10,13,9)101-1000: Month 72 (n=9,12,8)101-1000: Month 78 (n=0,12,8)101-1000: Month 84 (n=0,12,8)101-1000: Month 90 (n=0,12,7)101-1000: Month 96 (n=0,9,6)101-1000: Follow-up (n=2,4,4)>1000: Month 9 (n=17,14,12)>1000: Month 12 (n=17,14,12)>1000: Month 15 (n=17,14,12)>1000: Month 18 (n=17,13,12)>1000: Month 24 (n=15,13,12)>1000: Month 30 (n=13,14,10)>1000: Month 36 (n=15,14,8)>1000: Month 42 (n=14,12,9)>1000: Month 48 (n=15,9,6)>1000: Month 54 (n=14,14,10)>1000: Month 60 (n=13,13,10)>1000: Month 66 (n=10,13,9)>1000: Month 72 (n=9,12,8)>1000: Month 78 (n=0,12,8)>1000: Month 84 (n=0,12,8)>1000: Month 90 (n=0,12,7)>1000: Month 96 (n=0,9,6)>1000: Follow-up (n=2,4,4)
Tacrolimus88.294.188.288.2100.084.686.792.993.357.176.980.088.9NANANANA100.011.85.911.8015.413.37.16.742.923.120.011.1NANANANA0005.90000000000NANANANA00000000000000NANANANA00000000000000NANANANA0
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID71.464.357.153.861.542.957.133.366.750.061.538.541.741.750.058.333.350.028.635.730.830.850.035.758.311.142.930.846.250.058.350.041.766.750.0007.17.77.707.18.322.27.17.715.48.3000000007.707.1000000000000000000000000000000
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID33.333.341.741.733.330.025.022.2030.010.0037.525.012.542.933.375.066.758.341.758.360.062.566.783.370.080.055.650.062.575.042.950.025.008.38.316.78.30011.116.7010.044.40012.514.316.700000010.012.50000012.512.50000000000000000000000

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Hypertriglyceridemia by Visit

Hypertriglyceridemia was defined as triglyceride levels of >200 mg/dL or 2.3 mmol/L. (NCT00263328)
Timeframe: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 9 (n=18,14,13)Month 12 (n=18,14,12)Month 15 (n=18,14,12)Month 18 (n=18,14,12)Month 24 (n=17,14,12)Month 30 (n=15,14,11)Month 36 (n=15,14,11)Month 42 (n=15,14,10)Month 48 (n=15,14,10)Month 54 (n=14,14,10)Month 60 (n=13,14,10)Month 66 (n=12,14,10)Month 72 (n=9,13,8)Month 78 (n=0,13,8)Month 84 (n=0,13,8)Month 90 (n=0,12,8)Month 96 (n=0,11,6)Follow-Up (n=7,14,11)
Tacrolimus11.15.65.65.617.613.320.020.020.07.115.416.711.1NANANANA14.3
Tofacitinib 15-10-5 mg BID50.042.942.935.721.428.614.335.735.735.7014.323.17.77.78.318.214.3
Tofacitinib 30-15-10 mg BID38.533.341.733.333.336.427.320.030.040.030.020.050.025.037.550.033.327.3

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Discontinuation of Study Medication

(NCT00267189)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionPatients (Number)
Total # of discontinuation of study medicationAdverse EventPatient withdrew consentAbnormal laboratory value(s)Administrative problems
Group 1 (Everolimus)1814211
Group 2 (Control)10100

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Cockcroft-Gault Calculated Creatinine Clearance (CrCl)

"The primary variable was renal function assessed by calculated creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and was assessed at all visits.~CrCl[mL/min] = (140 - A) * W / (72 * C) * R. Where A is age at sample date [years], W is body weight at specific visit [kg], C is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL], R = 1 if the patient is male and = 0.85 if female." (NCT00267189)
Timeframe: From baseline to 6 months

InterventionmL/min (Mean)
Group 1 (Everolimus)0.99
Group 2 (Control)2.26

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Efficacy Failure (Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection [BPAR], Graft Loss or Death)

The composite efficacy failure endpoint encompasses at least one of: biopsy proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death for the patient. BPAR was defined as a clinically suspected acute rejection confirmed by biopsy. Acute rejection episodes were recorded as Liver Allograft Rejection. The allograft was presumed to be lost if a patient had a liver retransplant or died. (NCT00267189)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Composite efficacy failure (total)Biopsy proven acute rejectionGraft LossDeath
Group 1 (Everolimus)2.81.401.4
Group 2 (Control)1.41.400

[back to top]

Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, or Hyperglycemia

(NCT00270634)
Timeframe: Six months

,,,
InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Treatment with an AntihypertensiveTriglyceride values > ULNNew Onset of Diabetes Mellitus After Transplant
High Dose Voclosporin96.62817.7
Low Dose Voclosporin96.4181.6
Mid Dose Voclosporin97.4305.7
Tacrolimus95.33916.4

[back to top]

To Demonstrate a 5% Improvement in Renal Function as Measured by Iothalamate Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

ANOVAs to test for differences in GFR at Month 6. (NCT00270634)
Timeframe: Six months

InterventionmL/min (Mean)
High Dose Voclosporin68
Mid Dose Voclosporin72
Low Dose Voclosporin71
Tacrolimus69

[back to top]

The Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic Relationship Between Voclosporin and Calcineurin Inhibition (CNi), or Tacrolimus and Calcineurin Inhibition

"A sparse sampling protocol of whole blood samples obtained on Day 180 at time points immediately prior to drug administration and at 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose were utilized.~Standard non-compartmental analysis (NCA) was performed on whole blood concentration data for voclosporin and its metabolites, tacrolimus, MPA (mycophenolic acid) and MPAG (mycophenolic acid glucuronide). Tmax and Cmax were obtained directly from the concentration-time profiles without interpolation. AUC(0-4)[area under the curve] was calculated using log-linear trapezoidal rule. Cmax, AUC(0-4), C0 and C2 were summarized using descriptive statistics." (NCT00270634)
Timeframe: Six months

Intervention% Calcineurin (CNi) compared to baseline (Mean)
High Dose Voclosporin57.3
Mid Dose Voclosporin47.5
Low Dose Voclosporin38.8
Tacrolimus23.0

[back to top]

A Composite of Biopsy-proven Chronic Rejection Graft Loss, Death, or Lost to Follow up.

(NCT00270634)
Timeframe: Six months

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
High Dose Voclosporin5.6
Mid Dose Voclosporin7.4
Low Dose Voclosporin3.7
Tacrolimus3.9

[back to top]

Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)

The primary objective of the PROMISE trial was to demonstrate noninferiority of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) rate in de novo renal transplant patients at 6 months in at least one VCS treatment group. (NCT00270634)
Timeframe: Six months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
High Dose Voclosporin2.3
Mid Dose Voclosporin9.1
Low Dose Voclosporin10.7
Tacrolimus5.8

[back to top]

Graft Survival

(NCT00270634)
Timeframe: Six months

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
High Dose Voclosporin98.9
Mid Dose Voclosporin100
Low Dose Voclosporin100
Tacrolimus97.7

[back to top]

Patient Survival

(NCT00270634)
Timeframe: Six months

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
High Dose Voclosporin98.9
Mid Dose Voclosporin100
Low Dose Voclosporin100
Tacrolimus97.7

[back to top]

6-month Acute Cellular-mediated Rejection Rate (CMR)

Per 2007 international Banff Classification Criteria, CMR 1A was diagnosed on biopsies displaying significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected, i2 or i3) and foci of moderate tubulitis (t2). CMR IB was diagnosed in cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected, i2 or i3) and foci of severe tubulitis (t3). CMR IIA were cases with mild-to-moderate intimal arteritis (v1), while CMR IIB were those with severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area (v2). CMR III were those cases with transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation (v3). (NCT00275509)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tymoglobulin14
Daclizumab20

[back to top]

6-month Cumulative Rejection Incidence (Either CMR, AMR or Both)

Biopsy shows evidence of either AMR or CMR or evidence both. (NCT00275509)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tymoglobulin21
Daclizumab23

[back to top]

6-month Acute Antibody-mediated Rejection Rate (AMR)

A diagnosis of AMR was based on the 2013 international Banff Classification Criteria and is defined as the presence of circulating donor-specific antibody (DSA) and either: 1) peritubular capillary staining of C4d and at least one of the following: peritubular capillaritis (ptc) score>0, glomerulitis (g) score>0, acute thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) in the absence of any other cause, or other features consistent with AMR (endothelial injury, fibrin thrombi, microinfarctions, interstitial hemorrhage), or 2) absence of capillary staining of C4d and the presence of ptc>0 and g>0 or ptc>0 or g>0 and acute TMA, in the absence of any other cause of TMA. (NCT00275509)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tymoglobulin17
Daclizumab16

[back to top]

Survival

Survival (NCT00278512)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant6
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant0

[back to top]

Graft Survival

Graft survival was defined as any participant who did not meet the definition of graft loss, where graft loss was defined as graft failure (re-transplant) or participant death. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus MR90.77

[back to top]

Number of Participants Receiving Anti-lymphocyte Antibody Therapy for Acute Rejection

Steroid-resistant rejection episodes were treated with anti-lymphocyte antibodies. If a participant had a histologically proven Banff Grade II or III rejection, they could be initiated on anti-lymphocyte antibody treatment per institutional practice. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus MR1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)

Hepatic function was assessed by measuring alanine aminotransferase levels over the course of the study. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: Baseline (the last day of tacrolimus on Day 14 prior to the first conversion to tacrolimus MR), Day 56 (end of the pharmacokinetic phase) and end of treatment (EOT; the last observed value during treatment, maximum time on study was 60 months).

InterventionU/L (Mean)
Baseline [N= 69]Change from Baseline at Day 56 [N=67]Change from Baseline at EOT [N=68]
Tacrolimus MR38.514.413.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection

Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) is defined as an episode of acute liver allograft rejection that was confirmed by biopsy results and was Banff grade ≥ I. Biopsies were graded by the pathologist at the clinical site according to the 1997 Banff criteria for grading of acute liver allograft rejection: Indeterminate: Portal inflammatory infiltrate that fails to meet the criteria for diagnosis of acute rejection; Grade I (Mild): Rejection infiltrate in a minority of the triads that is generally mild and confined within the portal spaces; Grade II (Moderate): Rejection infiltrate, expanding to most or all of the triads; Grade III (Severe): Rejection infiltrate, expanding to most or all of the triads, with spillover into periportal areas and moderate to severe perivenular inflammation that extends into the hepatic parenchyma and is associated with perivenular hepatocyte necrosis. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus MR9.23

[back to top]

Time to Event for Graft Non-survival

For participants with graft loss, the median number of days from the first dose of study drug to graft loss. Graft loss was defined as graft failure (re-transplant) or participant death. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus MR1529.50

[back to top]

Patient Survival

Patient survival was defined as any participant known to be alive at the time of analysis. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus MR92.31

[back to top]

Safety as Assessed by Adverse Events, Laboratory Parameters and Vital Signs

"An adverse event is defined as any reaction, side effect or other untoward medical occurrence, regardless of the relationship to study drug which occurred during the conduct of a clinical study. Clinically significant adverse changes in clinical status, routine laboratory studies or physical examinations were considered adverse events.~A serious adverse event was any adverse event occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes:~Death~Life-threatening adverse event~Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization~Persistent or significant disability or incapacity~Congenital abnormality or birth defect~Important medical event." (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: From the first dose of tacrolimus MR formulation through the last dose day plus 10 days (approximately 60 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventSerious adverse eventAdverse event leading to discontinuationAdverse event leading to dose changesDeath
Tacrolimus MR633718375

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Tacrolimus (Tmax)

Time to the first occurrence to reach the maximum concentration of tacrolimus was calculated from whole blood tacrolimus concentrations for both the tacrolimus and tacrolimus MR treatment periods at steady state, without interpolation. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: Days 14 and 42 (tacrolimus) and Days 28 and 56 (tacrolimus MR), pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 (pre-dose for tacrolimus only), 12.5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionhours (Mean)
Day 14: TacrolimusDay 28: Tacrolimus MRDay 42: TacrolimusDay 56: Tacrolimus MR
Tacrolimus MR2.83.03.02.7

[back to top]

Primary Reason for Graft Loss

The primary reason for graft loss was recorded by the Investigator. Graft loss was defined as graft failure (re-transplant) or participant death. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Recurrent diseaseDeath
Tacrolimus MR15

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Multiple Rejection Episodes

This analysis includes rejection episodes that were either confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist or were clinically treated. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus MR2

[back to top]

Minimum Observed Concentration of Tacrolimus (Cmin)

The trough (minimum) concentration of tacrolimus determined from the tacrolimus whole blood concentration value at the 12 hour post-dose concentration based on the evening dose (i.e., the 8 am concentration) for tacrolimus and the 24-hour time point post-dose for tacrolimus MR, prior to receiving the next dose. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: Days 14 and 42 at 12 hours post-dose (tacrolimus) and Days 28 and 56 at 24 hours post-dose (for tacrolimus MR).

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 14: TacrolimusDay 28: Tacrolimus MRDay 42: TacrolimusDay 56: Tacrolimus MR
Tacrolimus MR7.15.56.85.8

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Concentration of Tacrolimus (Cmax)

The maximum concentration was calculated from whole blood tacrolimus concentrations for both the tacrolimus and tacrolimus MR treatment periods at steady state, without interpolation. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: Days 14 and 42 (tacrolimus) and Days 28 and 56 (tacrolimus MR), pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 (pre-dose for tacrolimus only), 12.5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 14: TacrolimusDay 28: Tacrolimus MRDay 42: TacrolimusDay 56: Tacrolimus MR
Tacrolimus MR17.913.316.014.1

[back to top]

Grade of Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection Episodes

Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) is defined as an episode of acute liver allograft rejection that was confirmed by biopsy results and was Banff grade ≥ I. Biopsies were graded by the clinical site pathologist according to the 1997 Banff criteria for grading of acute liver allograft rejection: Indeterminate: Portal inflammatory infiltrate that fails to meet the criteria for diagnosis of acute rejection; Grade I (Mild): Rejection infiltrate in a minority of the triads that is generally mild and confined within the portal spaces; Grade II (Moderate): Rejection infiltrate, expanding to most or all of the triads; Grade III (Severe): Rejection infiltrate, expanding to most or all of the triads, with spillover into periportal areas and moderate to severe perivenular inflammation that extends into the hepatic parenchyma and is associated with perivenular hepatocyte necrosis. For participants with more than one biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episode, the worst case grade is reported. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade IGrade IIGrade III
Tacrolimus MR420

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin

Hepatic function was assessed by measuring total bilirubin over the course of the study. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: Baseline (the last day of tacrolimus on Day 14 prior to the first conversion to tacrolimus MR), Day 56 (end of the pharmacokinetic phase) and end of treatment (EOT; the last observed value during treatment, maximum time on study was 60 months).

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline [N= 69]Change from Baseline at Day 56 [N=67]Change from Baseline at EOT [N=68]
Tacrolimus MR0.740.031.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

Hepatic function was assessed by measuring aspartate aminotransferase levels over the course of the study. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: Baseline (the last day of tacrolimus on Day 14 prior to the first conversion to tacrolimus MR), Day 56 (end of the pharmacokinetic phase) and end of treatment (EOT; the last observed value during treatment, maximum time on study was 60 months).

InterventionU/L (Mean)
Baseline [N= 69]Change from Baseline at Day 56 [N=67]Change from Baseline at EOT [N=68]
Tacrolimus MR33.43.610.6

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) for Tacrolimus

The area under the concentration-time curve was calculated from whole blood tacrolimus concentrations for both the tacrolimus and tacrolimus MR treatment periods at steady state using the linear trapezoidal rule. The AUC0-24 for tacrolimus was calculated as the sum of the AUC0-12 for the morning (0-12 hour) and afternoon (12-24 hour) doses. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: Days 14 and 42 (tacrolimus) and Days 28 and 56 (tacrolimus MR), pre-dose 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 (pre-dose for tacrolimus only), 12.5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
Day 14: TacrolimusDay 28: Tacrolimus MRDay 42: TacrolimusDay 56: Tacrolimus MR
Tacrolimus MR215.6184.0202.4187.9

[back to top]

Time to First Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection

For participants with a biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR), the median number of days from the first dose of study drug to the date of biopsy confirmation. BCAR is defined as an episode of acute liver allograft rejection that was confirmed by biopsy results and was Banff grade ≥ I. Biopsies were graded by the clinical site pathologist according to the 1997 Banff criteria for grading acute liver allograft rejection: Indeterminate: Portal inflammatory infiltrate that fails to meet the criteria for diagnosis of acute rejection; Grade I: Rejection infiltrate in a minority of the triads that is generally mild and confined within the portal spaces; Grade II: Rejection infiltrate, expanding to most or all of the triads; Grade III: Rejection infiltrate, expanding to most or all of the triads, with spillover into periportal areas and moderate to severe perivenular inflammation that extends into the hepatic parenchyma and is associated with perivenular hepatocyte necrosis. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus MR802.50

[back to top]

Time to Event for Patient Non-survival

For participants who died on study, the median number of days from first dose of study drug to death due to any cause. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus MR1561.00

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Treated Acute Rejection Episodes

A clinically treated acute rejection episode was any biopsy-confirmed or suspected rejection episode that was treated with immunosuppressive therapy. (NCT00282243)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus MR5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection

Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) is defined as an episode of acute liver allograft rejection that was confirmed by biopsy results and was Banff grade ≥ I. Biopsies were graded by the pathologist at the clinical site according to the 1997 Banff criteria for grading of acute liver allograft rejection: Indeterminate: Portal inflammatory infiltrate that fails to meet the criteria for diagnosis of acute rejection; Grade I (Mild): Rejection infiltrate in a minority of the triads that is generally mild and confined within the portal spaces; Grade II (Moderate): Rejection infiltrate, expanding to most or all of the triads; Grade III (Severe): Rejection infiltrate, expanding to most or all of the triads, with spillover into periportal areas and moderate to severe perivenular inflammation that extends into the hepatic parenchyma and is associated with perivenular hepatocyte. necrosis (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 54 months).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus MR16.67

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) for Tacrolimus

The area under the concentration-time curve was calculated from whole blood tacrolimus concentrations for both tacrolimus and tacrolimus MR at steady state using the linear trapezoidal rule. The AUC0-24 for tacrolimus was calculated as the sum of the AUC0-12 and AUC 12-24 for the morning and afternoon doses. (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: For tacrolimus, Day 7 at 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 12 (pre-dose), 13, 14, 15, 18, 20, and 24 hours. For tacrolimus MR, Day 14 at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15, 18, 20, and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
Day 7: TacrolimusDay 14: Tacrolimus MR
Tacrolimus MR198.2193.0

[back to top]

Time to First Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection

For participants with a biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR), the median number of days from the first dose of study drug to the date of biopsy confirmation. BCAR is defined as an episode of acute liver allograft rejection that was confirmed by biopsy results and was Banff grade ≥ I. Biopsies were graded by the clinical site pathologist according to the 1997 Banff criteria for grading acute liver allograft rejection: Indeterminate: Portal inflammatory infiltrate that fails to meet the criteria for diagnosis of acute rejection; Grade I: Rejection infiltrate in a minority of the triads that is generally mild and confined within the portal spaces; Grade II: Rejection infiltrate, expanding to most or all of the triads; Grade III: Rejection infiltrate, expanding to most or all of the triads, with spillover into periportal areas and moderate to severe perivenular inflammation that extends into the hepatic parenchyma and is associated with perivenular hepatocyte necrosis. (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 54 months).

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus MR748.00

[back to top]

Time to Event for Graft Non-survival

For participants with graft loss, the median number of days from the first dose of study drug to graft loss. Graft loss was defined as graft failure (re-transplant) or participant death. (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 54 months).

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus MR1203.00

[back to top]

Patient Survival

Patient survival was defined as any participant known to be alive at the end of the study. (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 54 months).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus MR94.44

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Multiple Rejection Episodes

This analysis includes rejection episodes that were either confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist or were clinically treated. (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 54 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus MR1

[back to top]

Grade of Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection Episodes

Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) is defined as an episode of acute liver allograft rejection that was confirmed by biopsy results and was Banff grade ≥ I. Biopsies were graded by the clinical site pathologist according to the 1997 Banff criteria for grading of acute liver allograft rejection: Indeterminate: Portal inflammatory infiltrate that fails to meet the criteria for diagnosis of acute rejection; Grade I (Mild): Rejection infiltrate in a minority of the triads that is generally mild and confined within the portal spaces; Grade II (Moderate): Rejection infiltrate, expanding to most or all of the triads; Grade III (Severe): Rejection infiltrate, expanding to most or all of the triads, with spillover into periportal areas and moderate to severe perivenular inflammation that extends into the hepatic parenchyma and is associated with perivenular hepatocyte necrosis. For participants with more than one biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episode, the worst case grade is reported. (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 54 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade IGrade IIGrade III
Tacrolimus MR210

[back to top]

Number of Participants Receiving Anti-lymphocyte Antibody Therapy for Acute Rejection

Steroid-resistant rejection episodes were treated with anti-lymphocyte antibodies. If a participant had a histologically proven Banff Grade II or III rejection, they could be initiated on anti-lymphocyte antibody treatment per institutional practice. (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 54 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus MR0

[back to top]

Graft Survival

Graft survival was defined as any participant who did not meet the definition of graft loss, where graft loss was defined as graft failure (re-transplant) or participant death. (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 54 months).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus MR94.44

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Treated Acute Rejection Episodes

A clinically treated acute rejection episode was any biopsy-confirmed or suspected rejection episode that was treated with immunosuppressive therapy. (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 54 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus MR3

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Tacrolimus (Tmax)

Time to reach the first observed maximum concentration of tacrolimus was calculated from whole blood tacrolimus concentrations for both tacrolimus and tacrolimus MR at steady state, without interpolation. (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: For tacrolimus, Day 7 at 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 12 (pre-dose), 13, 14, 15, 18, 20, and 24 hours. For tacrolimus MR, Day 14 at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15, 18, 20, and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionhours (Median)
Day 7: TacrolimusDay 14: Tacrolimus MR
Tacrolimus MR1.02.0

[back to top]

Safety as Assessed by Clinical Signs and Symptoms, Laboratory Parameters and Diagnostic Tests

"An adverse event (AE) is defined as any reaction, side effect or other untoward medical occurrence, regardless of the relationship to study drug which occurred during the conduct of a clinical study. Clinically significant adverse changes in clinical status, routine laboratory studies or physical examinations were considered adverse events.~A serious adverse event was any adverse event occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes:~Death~Life-threatening adverse event~Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization~Persistent or significant disability or incapacity~Congenital abnormality or birth defect~Important medical event." (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: From the first dose of tacrolimus MR formulation through the last dose day plus 10 days (approximately 54 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventAny deathAny serious adverse eventAny AE leading to a change in study drug doseAE leading to study drug discontinuation
Tacrolimus MR121631

[back to top]

Primary Reason for Graft Loss

The primary reason for graft loss was recorded by the Investigator. Graft loss was defined as graft failure (re-transplant) or participant death. (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 54 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Recurrent diseaseDeath
Tacrolimus MR01

[back to top]

Minimum Observed Concentration of Tacrolimus (Cmin)

The trough (minimum) concentration of tacrolimus determined from the tacrolimus whole blood concentration value at the 12 hour post-dose concentration based on the evening dose (i.e., the 8 am concentration) for tacrolimus and the 24-hour time point post-dose for tacrolimus MR, prior to receiving the next dose. (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: Day 7 at 12 hours post-dose (tacrolimus) and Day 14 at 24 hours post-dose (tacrolimus MR).

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 7: TacrolimusDay 14: Tacrolimus MR
Tacrolimus MR5.95.3

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Concentration of Tacrolimus (Cmax)

The maximum concentration was calculated from whole blood tacrolimus concentrations for both the tacrolimus and tacrolimus MR at steady state, without interpolation. (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: For tacrolimus, Day 7 at 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 12 (pre-dose), 13, 14, 15, 18, 20, and 24 hours. For tacrolimus MR, Day 14 at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15, 18, 20, and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 7: TacrolimusDay 14: Tacrolimus MR
Tacrolimus MR20.715.2

[back to top]

Time to Event for Patient Non-survival

For participants who died on study, the median number of days from first dose of study drug to death due to any cause. (NCT00282256)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 54 months).

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus MR1204.00

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD (aGVHD) Developing by Day 100 Following Non-myeloablative PBSC Transplantation Using Tacrolimus and Sirolimus.

All participants received tacrolimus and sirolimus in this one arm study. There were no participants considered unevaluable for this measure (deceased prior to day 100). The total number of people who developed grade II-IV aGVHD before day 100 are reported here. (NCT00282282)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus and Sirolimus5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥90 Percent Donor-derived Hematopoeisis Around 100 Days Post Transplantation

The percentage of participants with ≥90 percent donor-derived hematopoeisis was assessed around day +100 using peripheral blood chimerism. (NCT00282282)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus and Sirolimus78

[back to top]

Disease Response.

Disease response was assessed as 2 year progression-free survival. The median follow-up time was 1.84 years. The percentage of participants with who reached this timepoint with no disease progression are reported. (NCT00282282)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus and Sirolimus GVHD Prophylaxis48

[back to top]

Time to Event for Patient Non Survival

For participants who died on study, the median number of days from enrollment to death due to any cause. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus Modified Release1754.00

[back to top]

Time to First Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection

For participants with a biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, the median number of days from enrollment to the date of biopsy confirmation. Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) is defined as an episode of acute allograft rejection that was confirmed by biopsy results and was Banff grade ≥ IA. Biopsies were graded by the pathologist at the clinical site according to the 1997 Banff criteria: Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis; Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus Modified Release727.00

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) for Tacrolimus

The area under the concentration-time curve was calculated from whole blood tacrolimus concentrations for both tacrolimus and tacrolimus MR at steady state using the trapezoidal rule. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: For tacrolimus, Days 1 and 7 at 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 12 (pre-dose), 13, 14, 15, 18, 20, and 24 hours. For tacrolimus MR, Days 14 and 21 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15, 18, 20, and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
Day 1: TacrolimusDay 7: TacrolimusDay 14: Tacrolimus MRDay 21: Tacrolimus MR
Tacrolimus Modified Release215.1206.6200.7197.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance

Renal function was assessed using creatinine clearance levels calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, over the course of the study. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: Baseline (the last day of tacrolimus on Day 7), Day 35 (end of the pharmacokinetic phase) and end of treatment (EOT; the last observed value during treatment, maximum time on study was 60 months).

InterventionmL/minute (Mean)
Baseline [N= 67]Change from Baseline at Day 35 [N=66]Change from Baseline at EOT [N=67]
Tacrolimus Modified Release62.29-2.32-5.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine

Renal function was assessed using serum creatinine levels over the course of the study. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: Baseline (the last day of tacrolimus on Day 7), Day 35 (end of the pharmacokinetic phase) and end of treatment (EOT; the last observed value during treatment, maximum time on study was 60 months).

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline [N= 67]Change from Baseline at Day 35 [N=66]Change from Baseline at EOT [N=67]
Tacrolimus Modified Release1.370.090.57

[back to top]

Grade of Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection Episodes

"Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) is defined as an episode of acute allograft rejection that was confirmed by biopsy results and was Banff grade ≥ IA. Biopsies were graded by the pathologist at the clinical site according to the 1997 Banff criteria: Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis; Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel.~For participants with more than one biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episode, the worst case grade is reported." (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade IAGrade IBGrade IIAGrade IIBGrade III
Tacrolimus Modified Release31210

[back to top]

Minimum Concentration of Tacrolimus (Cmin)

The trough (minimum) concentration of tacrolimus determined from the tacrolimus whole blood concentration value at the 24-hour time point post- dose, prior to receiving the next dose. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 7 (tacrolimus) and Days 14 and 21 (tacrolimus MR), 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1: TacrolimusDay 7: TacrolimusDay 14: Tacrolimus MRDay 21: Tacrolimus MR
Tacrolimus Modified Release6.966.736.085.83

[back to top]

Primary Reason for Graft Loss

The primary reason for graft loss was recorded by the Investigator. Graft loss was defined as graft failure (re-transplant or permanent return to dialysis) or death. GBM = glomerular basement membrane. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Donor GBM diseaseDrug induced nephropathyPolyoma virusRenal insufficiencyNon-compliance with study medicationRecurrent diseaseDeath
Tacrolimus Modified Release1111113

[back to top]

Safety as Assessed by Adverse Events, Laboratory Parameters and Vital Signs

"An adverse event was defined as any reaction, side effect or other untoward medical occurrence, regardless of the relationship to study drug which occurred during the conduct of a clinical study. Clinically significant adverse changes in clinical status, routine laboratory studies or physical examinations were considered adverse events.~A serious adverse event was any adverse event occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes:~Death~Life-threatening adverse event~Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization~Persistent or significant disability or incapacity~Congenital abnormality or birth defect~Important medical event." (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: From the first dose of tacrolimus MR formulation through the day of last dose plus 10 days (approximately 60 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventAny serious adverse eventAdverse event leading to discontinuationAdverse Event leading to dose changesDeath
Tacrolimus Modified Release663916293

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Tacrolimus (Tmax)

The time to reach the maximum concentration of tacrolimus was calculated from whole blood tacrolimus concentrations for both tacrolimus and tacrolimus MR at steady state, without interpolation. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: For tacrolimus, Days 1 and 7 at 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 12 (pre-dose), 13, 14, 15, 18, 20, and 24 hours. For tacrolimus MR, Days 14 and 21 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15, 18, 20, and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionhours (Mean)
Day 1: TacrolimusDay 7: TacrolimusDay 14: Tacrolimus MRDay 21: Tacrolimus MR
Tacrolimus Modified Release1.92.03.12.7

[back to top]

Patient Survival

Patient Survival defined as any participant who did not die by the time of analysis. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus Modified Release95.45

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Tacrolimus

The maximum concentration was calculated from whole blood tacrolimus concentrations for both tacrolimus and tacrolimus MR at steady state, without interpolation. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: For tacrolimus, Days 1 and 7 at 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 12 (pre-dose), 13, 14, 15, 18, 20, and 24 hours. For tacrolimus MR, Days 14 and 21 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15, 18, 20, and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1: TacrolimusDay 7: TacrolimusDay 14: Tacrolimus MRDay 21: Tacrolimus MR
Tacrolimus Modified Release17.216.014.314.2

[back to top]

Graft Survival

Graft survival was defined as any participant who did not meet the definition of graft loss, where graft loss was defined as graft failure (re-transplant or permanent return to dialysis (for more than 30 days)) or participants death. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus Modified Release86.36

[back to top]

Number of Participants Receiving Anti-lymphocyte Antibody Therapy for Acute Rejection

Steroid-resistant rejection episodes were treated with anti-lymphocyte antibodies. If a participant had a histologically proven Banff Grade II or III rejection, they could be initiated on anti-lymphocyte antibody treatment per institutional practice. Biopsies were graded by the pathologist at the clinical site according to the 1997 Banff criteria: Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis; Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus Modified Release4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Returning to Permanent Dialysis

Permanent dialysis defined as dialysis for longer than 30 days. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus Modified Release3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Treated Acute Rejection Episodes

A clinically treated acute rejection episode was any biopsy-confirmed or suspected rejection episode that was treated with immunosuppressive therapy. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus Modified Release7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Multiple Rejection Episodes

This analysis includes rejection episodes that were either confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist or were clinically treated. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus Modified Release2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection

Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) is defined as an episode of acute allograft rejection that was confirmed by biopsy results and was Banff grade ≥ IA. Biopsies were graded by the pathologist at the clinical site according to the 1997 Banff criteria: Borderline: No intimal arteritis present but foci of mild tubulitis; Grade I: Significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate to severe tubulitis; Grade II: Mild to severe intimal arteritis; Grade III: Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus Modified Release10.61

[back to top]

Time to Event for Graft Non Survival

For participants with graft loss, the median number of days from enrollment to graft loss. Graft loss was defined as graft failure (re-transplant or permanent return to dialysis (for more than 30 days)) or participant death. (NCT00282568)
Timeframe: From enrollment until the end of study (up to 60 months).

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus Modified Release1526.00

[back to top]

Renal Function at 3 Months Assessed by Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)

Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline to Month 3 calculated by using abbreviated MDRD formula. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula is: GFR [mL/min/1.73m^2] = 186.3*(C^-1.154)*(A^-0.203)*G*R where -C is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL], -A is patient age at sample collection date [years], -G=0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G=1, -R=1.21 when race is black, otherwise R=1. (NCT00284934)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Baseline (n= 47, 45)Month 3 (n= 44, 43)Change from Baseline to Month 3 (n= 44, 43)
High EC-MPS46.448.62.1
Standard Dose EC-MPS45.344.6-0.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Failure Parameters (Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss, Death, or Loss to Follow-up) at 6 Months

A biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III based on the Banff 1997 classification.The allograft was presumed lost on the day the patient started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis. If the patient went through a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was the day of graft loss. (NCT00284934)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Biopsy proven acute rejectionTreated acute rejectionGraft lossDeath
High EC-MPS0000
Standard Dose EC-MPS0000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Graft and Patient Survivals at 6 Months

Graft survival was defined as the number of patients with no graft loss. The allograft was presumed lost on the day the patient started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis. If the patient went through a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was the day of graft loss. Patient survival was defined as the number of patients alive with or without a functioning graft. (NCT00284934)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Graft survivalPatient survival
High EC-MPS4545
Standard Dose EC-MPS4747

[back to top]

Renal Function Assessed by Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate(eGFR)

Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline to Month 6 calculated by using abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula is: GFR [mL/min/1.73m^2] = 186.3*(C^-1.154)*(A^-0.203)*G*R where -C is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL], -A is patient age at sample collection date [years], -G=0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G=1, -R=1.21 when race is black, otherwise R=1. (NCT00284934)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Baseline (n= 47, 45)Month 6 (n= 45, 43)Change from Baseline - Month 6 (n= 45, 43)
High EC-MPS56.449.12.4
Standard Dose EC-MPS45.344.7-0.4

[back to top]

Patient Survival Rate

Percentage of recipients who are still alive at the end of 1 and 2 years. (NCT00296244)
Timeframe: 1 and 2 years

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
1-year patient survival rate2-year patient survival rate
Control Group10090
Study Group94.784

[back to top]

Incidence and Severity of HCV Recurrence Post-OLT

The incidence and severity of HCV recurrence based on Hepatitis C PCR levels and protocol liver biopsy findings were found to be similar between the 2 groups. (NCT00296244)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplant

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Control Group27
Study Group29

[back to top]

Acute Rejection Rate

Biopsy proven acute rejection defined by biochemical and histological changes as well as the need for temporary steroid use occurred in 1 patient in each group both of which were steroid responsive (NCT00296244)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplant

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Control Group5
Study Group5

[back to top]

Graft Survival Rate

Percentage of recipients whose liver grafts are still working at the end of 1 and 2 years. (NCT00296244)
Timeframe: 1 and 2 years

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1-year graft survival rate2-year graft survival rate
Control Group10090
Study Group94.784

[back to top]

New-onset Diabetes Mellitus (NODM) as Secondary Outcome

The incidence of new-onset Diabetes mellitus (NODM, based on percentage of previously non-diabetic patients who developed DM post-transplantation, was similar between the 2 groups. (NCT00296244)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Control Group40
Study Group42

[back to top]

Infection as an Adverse Effect of Steroids

Incidence of bacterial infection was similar in the control group as well as study group, 4 patients in both groups had infection (NCT00296244)
Timeframe: 3 months post-transplant

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Control Group20
Study Group21

[back to top]

Freedom From Insulin Therapy Post Transplant

The count of participants with freedom from insulin therapy post transplant is reported. (NCT00296296)
Timeframe: From hospital discharge to 1 year post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cyclosporin3
Tacrolimus4

[back to top]

Patient Survival at One Year Post Transplantation

Count of participants alive at one year post transplantation (NCT00296296)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cyclosporin10
Tacrolimus16

[back to top]

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) 1 Year Following Transplantation

Values of ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m^2 are considered optimal; ≥30-59 ml/min/1.73 m^2 are indicative of successful graft function; lower values are indicative or graft dysfunction. (NCT00296296)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplantation

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
≥60 ml/min/1.73 m^2≥30-59 ml/min/1.73 m^2<30 ml/min/1.73 m^2
Cyclosporin461
Tacrolimus693

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at One Year Post Transplantation

(NCT00296296)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cyclosporin1
Tacrolimus3

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Allograft Vasculopathy (CAD) at One Year Post Transplant

Number of patients diagnosed with allograft vasculopathy / coronary artery disease (CAD) at one year post transplant (NCT00299221)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpatients (Number)
Monotherapy0
Combination Therapy0

[back to top]

Mean International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Biopsy Score Over the First 6 Months Post-transplantation

Mean ISHLT biopsy score Biopsies of the heart may be various grades and each is assigned a numerical score. Grade 0 is 0 points, 1A = 1, 1B = 2, grade 2 = 3, grade 3A = 4, Grade 3B = 5, and grade 4 = 6 units. The mean biopsy score is the numeric average of the biopsy scores for the first 6 post-transplant months. Best value is 0, worst score is 6. (NCT00299221)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Monotherapy0.7
Combination Therapy0.65

[back to top]

Mean ISHLT Biopsy Score Over First Year Post-transplant

Mean ISHLT biopsy score Biopsies of the heart may be various grades and each is assigned a numerical score. Grade 0 is 0 points, 1A = 1, 1B = 2, grade 2 = 3, grade 3A = 4, Grade 3B = 5, and grade 4 = 6 units. The mean biopsy score is the numeric average of the biopsy scores for the first 6 post-transplant months. Best value is 0, worst score is 6. (NCT00299221)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Monotherapy0.67
Combination Therapy0.62

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) at One Year Post-transplant

Number of patients developing cytomegalovirus disease by 1 year post-transplant (NCT00299221)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Monotherapy2
Combination Therapy2

[back to top]

Percent of Patients Alive at One Year Post-transplant

Percent of patients alive at one year post-transplant. In other words, all cause mortality over time (NCT00299221)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Monotherapy98
Combination Therapy98

[back to top]

Annual Change Rate in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (CIMT) From Pre-conversion Baseline at 12, 18, 24 and 36 Months Post-transplant

Within-subject annual change rate in CIMT as determined by ultrasound. Mean CIMT=average of left CIMT and right CIMT. Annual CIMT Change Rate (mm/year) = (CIMT at Month x Post-transplant Visit - CIMT at Conversion Baseline) / Imaging interval in years. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, and 12, 18, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventionmillimeter/year (mm/year) (Mean)
Annual Change Rate at 12 months (n=16,28)Annual Change Rate at 18 months (n=15,26)Annual Change Rate at 24 months (n=15,23)Annual Change Rate at 36 months (n=8,13)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.0480.0410.0230.028
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.012-0.00020.015-0.007

[back to top]

Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant.

hsCRP is a biomarker of cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis risk. A higher level indicates a greater risk. Change = month x post-transplant values - pre-conversion baseline values. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Change at 12 Months post-transplant (n=23,33)Change at 24 Months post-transplant (n=18,31)Change at 36 Months post-transplant (n=15,22)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone1.611-0.5630.336
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone1.3791.7233.164

[back to top]

Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Homocysteine at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant

Homocysteine is a biomarker for cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis risk. A higher level indicates a greater risk. Change = month x post-transplant values - pre-conversion baseline values. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventionmicromole/liter (µmol/L) (Mean)
Change at 12 Months post-transplant (n=23,33)Change at 24 Months post-transplant (n=19,31)Change at 36 Months post-transplant (n=15,22)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone1.2781.3161.087
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.5302.1582.459

[back to top]

Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Insulin at Months 12, 24, and 36 Post-transplant

Fasting insulin. Change = value at month x post-transplant - pre-conversion baseline. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventionpicomole/liter (pmol/L) (Mean)
Change at 12 Months post-transplant (n=16,23)Change at 24 Months post-transplant (n=13,23)Change at 36 Months post-transplant (n=10,14)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone-4.549-6.120-22.759
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone17.95332.180-2.731

[back to top]

Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant

IL-6 is a biomarker for cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis risk. A higher level indicates a greater risk. Change = month x post-transplant values - pre-conversion values. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Change at 12 Months post-transplant (n=23,32)Change at 24 Months post-transplant (n=18,29)Change at 36 Months post-transplant (n=15,22)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone-0.2390.128-0.800
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.4630.7830.164

[back to top]

Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant

Lipoprotein(a) is a biomarker for cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis risk. A higher level indicates a greater risk. Change = month x post-transplant values - pre-conversion baseline values. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventionmilligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (Mean)
Change at 12 Months post-transplant (n=23,30)Change at 24 Months post-transplant (n=18,26)Change at 36 Months post-transplant (n=13,17)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone13.49612.51711.885
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone-11.6806.0736.547

[back to top]

Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters at 12, 18, 24 and 36 Months Post-transplant

Total Cholesterol (TC), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) and Triglyceride (Tg) blood concentrations. Higher levels of TC, LDL and Tg are less desirable. Lower levels of HDL are less desirable. Change for each parameter = value at 12, 18, 24 and 36 months post-transplant - value at pre-conversion baseline. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, and 12, 18, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventionmillimole/liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Change in TC 12 Months post-transplant (n=23,30)Change in LDL 12 Months post-transplant (n=21,30)Change in HDL 12 Months post-transplant (n=23,30)Change in Tg 12 Months post-transplant (n=23,30)Change in TC 18 Months post-transplant (n=21,29)Change in LDL 18 Months post-transplant (n=20,29)Change in HDL 18 Months post-transplant (n=21,29)Change in Tg 18 Months post-transplant (n=21,29)Change in TC 24 Months post-transplant (n=19,27)Change in LDL 24 Months post-transplant (n=16,27)Change in HDL 24 Months post-transplant (n=19,27)Change in Tg 24 Months post-transplant (n=19,27)Change in TC 36 Months post-transplant (n=15,21)Change in LDL 36 Months post-transplant (n=13,21)Change in HDL 36 Months post-transplant (n=15,21)Change in Tg 36 Months post-transplant (n=15,21)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.5100.2770.0590.6170.3610.2220.1060.3590.2400.0670.0670.5470.3860.0270.0980.527
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone-0.164-0.056-0.053-0.1170.0820.138-0.030-0.057-0.0080.054-0.019-0.088-0.323-0.2570.111-0.385

[back to top]

CIMT at Pre-conversion Baseline

Mean CIMT=average of left CIMT and right CIMT. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline

Interventionmm (Mean)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.735
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.773

[back to top]

Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Fibrinogen at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant

Fibrinogen is a biomarker for cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis risk. A higher level indicates a greater risk. Change = month x post-transplant values - pre-conversion baseline values. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventiongram per liter (g/L) (Mean)
Change at 12 Months post-transplant (n=22,31)Change at 24 Months post-transplant (n=19,29)Change at 36 Months post-transplant (n=14,20)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.620.450.40
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.200.330.21

[back to top]

Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Glucose at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant

Fasting plasma glucose. Change = value at month x post-transplant - pre-conversion baseline values. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Change at 12 Months post-transplant (n=23,33)Change at 24 Months post-transplant (n=19,31)Change at 36 Months post-transplant (n=14,22)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.6060.8320.686
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone-0.083-0.076-0.214

[back to top]

Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-alpha) at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant

TNF-alpha is a biomarker for cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis risk. A higher level indicates a greater risk. Change = month x post-transplant values - pre-conversion baseline values. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Change at 12 Months post-transplant (n=23,32)Change at 24 Months post-transplant (n=18,30)Change at 36 Months post-transplant (n=15,22)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.991-0.367-0.441
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.0001.8940.000

[back to top]

Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Uric Acid at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant

Uric Acid is a biomarker for cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis risk. A higher level indicates a greater risk. Change = month x post-transplant values - pre-conversion baseline values. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventionµmol/L (Mean)
Change at 12 Months post-transplant (n=23,33)Change at 24 Months post-transplant (n=19,31)Change at 36 Months post-transplant (n=15,22)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone-51.53-29.02-19.03
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone11.103.89-0.58

[back to top]

Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Vitamin B12 at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant

Vitamin B12 is a biomarker for cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis risk. A lower level indicates a greater risk. Change = month x post-transplant values - pre-conversion values. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventionpmol/L (Mean)
Change at 12 Months post-transplant (n=21,33)Change at 24 Months post-transplant (n=19,29)Change at 36 Months post-transplant (n=14,21)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone-10.21-36.23-40.00
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone-11.38-27.46-46.39

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Used Anti-hypertensive Medications

"Participants who reported yes for taking anti-hypertensive medications as concomitant medication." (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: From consent to conversion, from conversion to Month 12, from Months 12 to 24, and from Months 24 to 36 post-transplant

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
From consent to conversionFrom conversion to Month 12From Months 12 to Month 24From Months 24 to Month 36
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone19212118
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone30303028

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Used Lipid Lowering Therapies

"Participants who reported yes for taking lipid lowering therapies as concomitant medication." (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: From consent to conversion, from conversion to Month 12, from Months 12 to 24, and from Months 24 to 36 post-transplant

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
From consent to conversionFrom conversion to Month 12From Months 12 to Month 24From Months 24 to Month 36
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone13222318
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone24292827

[back to top]

Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Adiponectin at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant

Adiponectin is a biomarker for cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis risk. A higher level indicates less risk. Change = month x post-transplant values - pre-conversion baseline values. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventionmicrogram per milliliter (µg/mL) (Mean)
Change at 12 Months post-transplant (n=23,33)Change at 24 Months post-transplant (n=18,31)Change at 36 Months post-transplant (n=15,22)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone5.3522.2441.487
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone-2.205-0.267-1.413

[back to top]

Annual Change Rate in Total Plaque Volume (TPV) From Pre-conversion Baseline to 12 Months Post-transplant

Within-subject annual change rate in TPV in the left and right distal common carotid arteries from the pre-conversion baseline to 12 months post kidney transplant as determined by ultrasound. Annual change rate equals (=) (TPV at month 12 post-transplant minus [-] TPV at pre-conversion baseline) divided (/) by imaging interval in years. TPV is the sum of assessment in left and right distal common carotid arteries. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline and 12 months post-transplant

Interventionmillimeter cube/year (mmˆ3/year) (Mean)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone-49.31
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.66

[back to top]

Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin(HbA1C) at Months 12, 24, and 36 Post-transplant

HbA1C, change = value at month x post-transplant - pre-conversion baseline. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventionpercentage of glucose (Mean)
Change at 12 Months post-transplant (n=23,26)Change at 24 Months post-transplant (n=17,25)Change at 36 Months post-transplant (n=14,16)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.0080.0090.012
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.0010.006-0.001

[back to top]

TPV at Pre-conversion Baseline

TPV is the sum of the assessment in left and right distal common carotid arteries. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline

Interventionmmˆ3 (Mean)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone68.68
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone48.57

[back to top]

Change From Pre-conversion Baseline in Endothelin-1 at Months 12, 24 and 36 Post-transplant

Endothelin-1 is a biomarker for cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis risk. A higher level indicates greater risk. Change = month x post-transplant values - pre-conversion baseline values. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Change at 12 Months post-transplant (n=22,30)Change at 24 Months post-transplant (n=18,30)Change at 36 Months post-transplant (n=14,22)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.2940.4260.411
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone0.0280.138-0.104

[back to top]

Annual Rate of Change in TPV From Pre-conversion Baseline to 18, 24 and 36 Months Post Transplant

Within-subject annual change rate in TPV in the left and right distal common carotid arteries from the pre-conversion baseline to 18, 24 and 36 months post kidney transplant as determined by ultrasound. Annual change rate equals (=) (TPV at month 18, 24 and 36 post-transplant minus [-] TPV at pre-conversion baseline) divided (/) by imaging interval in years. TPV is the sum of assessment in left and right distal common carotid arteries. (NCT00311311)
Timeframe: Pre-conversion baseline, and 18, 24 and 36 months post-transplant

,
Interventionmmˆ3/year (Mean)
Month 18 post-transplant (n=12,12)Month 24 post-transplant (n=11,14)Month 36 post-transplant (n=7,11)
Tacrolimus Then Sirolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone17.1525.286.62
Tacrolimus With Mycophenolate/Prednisone19.719.108.98

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT00322101)
Timeframe: At 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Regimen)6
Arm II (Myeloablative Regimen)6

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

IWG criteria was used to determine disease progression (NCT00322101)
Timeframe: After stem cell infusion to date of last follow up.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Regimen)7
Arm II (Myeloablative Regimen)5

[back to top]

Non-relapse Mortality

(NCT00322101)
Timeframe: At 100 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Regimen)0
Arm II (Myeloablative Regimen)0

[back to top]

Donor Cell Engraftment

Chimerism analysis was performed in patients who recieved nonmyeloablative tranplsnat. In this group the definition of engraftment was a CD3 count greater than 50%. In the myeloablative group, engraftment was defined as an absolute neutrophil count greater than 50%. (NCT00322101)
Timeframe: After stem cell infusion to day 28

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Regimen)11
Arm II (Myeloablative Regimen)11

[back to top]

Incidence and Severity of Acute and Chronic Graft-vs-host Disease

(NCT00322101)
Timeframe: After transplantation

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Regimen)1
Arm II (Myeloablative Regimen)4

[back to top]

Incidence of Disease Progression/Relapse

Disease progression/relapse was defined by IWG criteria (NCT00322101)
Timeframe: After stem cell infusion to date of last follow up.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Regimen)7
Arm II (Myeloablative Regimen)2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events and Death

Participants were monitored for adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths thorughout the prospective and follow-up phases of the study. (NCT00332839)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Adverse events (serious and non-serious)Serious adverse eventsDeaths
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Group44111
Certican Group44121

[back to top]

Participants Who Reduced Steroid Use at One Year After Enrollment on the Trial

Participants that decreased total daily corticosteroids ≤ 0.25mg/kg one year after rituximab infusion began (NCT00350545)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab + Prednisone Arm14

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Ability to Successfully Taper Prednisone to a Dose Lower Dose.

Participants that have successfully tapered prednisone to a dose of 0.25 mg/kg/Day by 6 Months without clinical relapse. (NCT00350545)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab + Prednisone Arm14

[back to top]

Failure-free Survival at 6 and 12 Months Post-Rituximab Initiation

Failure-free survival (FFS) was defined as participants who are surviving with no relapse and second line of cGVHD treatment. (NCT00350545)
Timeframe: 6 and 12 Months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
6 month FFS12 month FFS
Rituximab + Prednisone Arm2821

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival at 6 and 12 months (NCT00350545)
Timeframe: 6 and 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
6 month overall survival12 month overall survival
Rituximab + Prednisone Arm3330

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete and/or Partial GVHD Response

To have physician documentation of clinical GVHD response using organ staging and scoring scale- NIH clinical GVHD consensus response criteria applied 6 months after rituximab infusion began (NCT00350545)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete responsePartial response
Rituximab + Prednisone Arm1215

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade I/II Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

Number of patients diagnosed with overall GI/G2 acute GVHD by Day 100 (NCT00358657)
Timeframe: Day 100 post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemo, Total-body Irradiation, Transplant)7

[back to top]

Incidence of Chronic GVHD

Number of patients diagnosed with chronic GVHD by 1 year post transplant (NCT00358657)
Timeframe: 1 year post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemo, Total-body Irradiation, Transplant)11

[back to top] [back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who Achieve Greater Than 5% Donor T-cell Chimerism

Number of patients who achieve greater than 5% donor T-cell (CD3+) chimerisms (NCT00358657)
Timeframe: By day 84

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemo, Total-body Irradiation, Transplant)13

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Infections

Number of patients with clinically significant infections requiring treatment within 200 days after HCT (NCT00358657)
Timeframe: Through day 200 after HCT

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemo, Total-body Irradiation, Transplant)11

[back to top]

Graft Failure

Number of patients with graft failure (grade IV thrombocytopenia and neutropenia after day 21 that lasts > 2 weeks andn is refractory to growth factor support). (NCT00358657)
Timeframe: Day 84

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemo, Total-body Irradiation, Transplant)0

[back to top]

Graft Rejection

Number of patients with graft rejection (CD3 donor chimerisms <5%). (NCT00358657)
Timeframe: Day 84

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemo, Total-body Irradiation, Transplant)1

[back to top]

Immune Reconstitution

Number of patients with normal range CD3 @ 1 year post transplant (NCT00358657)
Timeframe: 1 year post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemo, Total-body Irradiation, Transplant)4

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade III/IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

Number of patients diagnosed with overall GIII/IV acute GVHD by Day 100 (NCT00358657)
Timeframe: Day 100 post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemo, Total-body Irradiation, Transplant)5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

number of participants alive at one year (NCT00360685)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus And Methotrexate28
Tacrolimus And Mycophenolate Mofetil27

[back to top]

Incidence of Severe Mucositis

Mucositis was assessed prospectively daily while the patient was hospitalized and graded retrospectively based on nurse and clinician assessments according to the clinical criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE; version 3.0). Severe mucositis as defined as grade 3 or grade 4. (NCT00360685)
Timeframe: 2 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus And Methotrexate25
Tacrolimus And Mycophenolate Mofetil14

[back to top]

Incidence of Acute Graft-vs-host Disease (aGVHD)

incidence of aGVHD (grades 2 - 4) 100 days post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (NCT00360685)
Timeframe: 100 days post transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus And Methotrexate45
Tacrolimus And Mycophenolate Mofetil33

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Incidence of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)

Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was defined as a clinically suspected acute rejection confirmed by biopsy (performed by the local pathologist). For all clinically suspected rejection episodes a graft core biopsy must have been performed before or within a 24 hour period from the initiation of anti-rejection therapy. (NCT00369161)
Timeframe: from Month 4 through to Month 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very Low Dose Tacrolimus2
Low Dose Tacrolimus1

[back to top]

Renal Function Assessed by Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR)

"Renal function was assessed by calculated glomerular filtration rate (cGFR) using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)formula.~GFR [mL/min/1.73m^2] = 186.3*(C-1.154)*(A-0.203)*G*R, where:~C is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL],~A is patient age at sample collection date [years],~G=0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G=1,~R=1.21 when race is black, otherwise R=1" (NCT00369161)
Timeframe: 12 months post -transplant

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Very Low Dose Tacrolimus57.07
Low Dose Tacrolimus51.73

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure

Efficacy failure was a composite of BPAR, graft loss, death or lost to follow-up. BPAR was defined as a clinically suspected acute rejection confirmed by biopsy (performed by the local pathologist). For all clinically suspected rejection episodes a graft core biopsy must have been performed before or within a 24 hour period from the initiation of anti-rejection therapy. An allograft was presumed to be lost on the day a patient started dialysis and was unable to subsequently be removed from dialysis. If the patient underwent a graft nephrectomy, the day of nephrectomy was the day of graft loss. (NCT00369161)
Timeframe: Month 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Efficacy failure (Composite)BPARGraft loss or deathGraft LossDeathLost To Follow-up
Low Dose Tacrolimus4.31.12.21.11.11.1
Very Low Dose Tacrolimus6.72.74.01.32.70.0

[back to top]

Sustained Engraftment Following Transplant.

As measured by median total donor chimerism at day 100. (NCT00369226)
Timeframe: by day 100 post transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase I and Phase II97

[back to top]

The Maximally Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Bortezomib (Velcade) That Can be Administered With Tacrolimus and Methotrexate After Mismatched Allogeneic Non-myeloablative Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Transplantation

"The MTD of bortezomib was evaluated at 3 dose levels:~Dose level 1: 1.0 mg/m^2 Dose level 2: 1.3 mg/m^2 Dose level 3: 1.5 mg/m^2 Cohorts of 3-5 pts were enrolled at each dose level. At any dose level, if no DLT in the first 3, 4, or 5 pts, then dose escalation would occur.~If 3 evaluable pts in cohort, and 1 of 3 experiences DLT then 2 additional pts treated at the same dose level. If >=1 of 2 additional pts experience DLT then previous dose level will be MTD. If no DLT in additional 2 pts then dose escalation will occur. If 4 evaluable pts in cohort, and 1 of the 4 experiences DLT then 1 additional pt treated at same dose level. If this additional pt experiences DLT then the previous dose will be declared to be the MTD. If additional pt does not experience DLT, then dose escalation will take place. If 5 evaluable pts in cohort, and 1 experiences DLT, then dose escalation will take place. If >=2 of first 3, 4, or 5 pts experience DLT then the previous dose will be declared MTD." (NCT00369226)
Timeframe: by day 45 post PBSC infusion

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase I1.3

[back to top]

Successful Initial Engraftment by Day 45 Post Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Infusion and Administration of Bortezomib (Velcade), Tacrolimus and Methotrexate

Percentage of participants who did not experience failure to engraft or relapse or death before assessment. (NCT00369226)
Timeframe: by day 45 post PBSC infusion

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combined Phase I Plus Phase II97

[back to top]

Overall Survival and Progression-free Survival.

Progression is defined as disease relapse or disease progression since transplant. (NCT00369226)
Timeframe: by 1 year after PBSC infusion

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Progression-free Survival (PFS)60
Overall Survival (OS)76

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) by Day 100.

(NCT00369226)
Timeframe: by day 100 after peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) infusion

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase I and Phase II22

[back to top]

Incidence of Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (Chronic GVHD).

Number of participants with chronic GVHD at 1 year post transplant. (NCT00369226)
Timeframe: by 1 year after PBSC infusion

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase I and Phase II29

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Acute Rejection

Based on International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation [ISHLT] 1990 criteria: rejections Grade 3A or higher, rejection accompanied by hemodynamic compromise or requiring treatment. Grade 3A or higher included: multifocal aggressive infiltrates and/or myocyte damage, diffuse inflammatory process with necrosis, diffuse aggressive polymorphus with necrosis, increased infiltrates, and changes in edema, hemorrhage, or vasculitis. Biopsies performed for clinically suspected rejection (for cause), site's standard of care (site protocol biopsy), or protocol mandated. (NCT00369382)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
For cause biopsies (n=57, 57)Standard of Care biopsies (n=11, 11)Protocol mandated biopsies (n=0, 39)
Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus10NA
Sirolimus (SRL)527

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine Level at 4, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52 Weeks Post-randomization

Serum creatinine is an indicator of kidney function. Creatinine is a substance formed from the metabolism of creatine, commonly found in blood, urine, and muscle tissue. It is removed from the blood by the kidneys and excreted in urine. Normal adult blood levels of creatinine=45 to 90 micromoles per liter (mcmol/L) for females, 60 to 110 mcmol/L for males, however normal values are age-dependent. Change from baseline=creatinine level at Week x minus baseline level where higher scores represented decreased kidney function. Least squares mean adjusted for treatment group and center. (NCT00369382)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52

,
Interventionmcmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 16Week 24Week 32Week 40Week 52
Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus1.687.968.024.082.444.76
Sirolimus (SRL)-4.95-5.52-0.89-2.802.81-4.39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Calculated Creatinine Clearance (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] Equation) at 4, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 Weeks Post-randomization

Creatinine clearance calculated using MDRD equation. Normal adult creatinine clearance is ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73m^2. Change from baseline=CC at Week X minus CC at baseline where higher scores represented improved renal function. Least squares mean adjusted for baseline calculated creatinine clearance (MDRD) and center. (NCT00369382)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 16Week 24Week 32Week 40Week 52
Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus-0.00-1.92-1.47-0.150.69-0.90
Sirolimus (SRL)3.184.302.542.442.693.26

[back to top]

Serum Creatinine Level at Baseline

Serum creatinine is an indicator of kidney function. Creatinine is a substance formed from the metabolism of creatine, commonly found in blood, urine, and muscle tissue. It is removed from the blood by the kidneys and excreted in urine. (NCT00369382)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionmcmol/L (Mean)
Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus125.42
Sirolimus (SRL)126.21

[back to top]

Number of Participants Requiring Antibody Use in Treatment of Acute Rejection

Number of participants requiring antilymphocyte antibody therapy with suspected or biopsy-proven, steroid-resistant, acute rejection with or without hemodynamic compromise. Acute rejection based on ISHLT 1990 criteria: all rejections Grade 3A or higher, any rejection accompanied by hemodynamic compromise, or any rejection requiring treatment. ISHLT Grade 3A or higher included: Multifocal aggressive infiltrates and/or myocyte damage, diffuse inflammatory process with necrosis, diffuse aggressive polymorphus with necrosis, increased infiltrates, and changes in edema, hemorrhage, or vasculitis. (NCT00369382)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus1
Sirolimus (SRL)0

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Sirolimus Treatment Group Requiring Conversion Back to CNI Therapy

(NCT00369382)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sirolimus (SRL)21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Calculated Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault Equation) at 52 Weeks Post-randomization

Creatinine Clearance (CC) calculated using Cockcroft-Gault equation, adjusted for body surface area. Calculated CC: method to approximate kidney function. It measures rate creatinine (substance formed from metabolism of creatine) is cleared from blood by kidneys. Normal adult creatinine clearance is greater than or equal to (≥) 90 milliliters per minute per 1.73 meters squared (mL/min/1.73m^2). Change from baseline=CC at Week 52 minus CC at baseline where higher scores represented improved renal function; Least squares mean adjusted for baseline calculated creatinine clearance and center. (NCT00369382)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Least Squares Mean)
Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus-1.35
Sirolimus (SRL)3.03

[back to top]

Calculated Creatinine Clearance (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] Equation) at Baseline

Creatinine clearance calculated using MDRD equation. Calculated CC: method to approximate kidney function. It measures rate creatinine (substance formed from metabolism of creatine) is cleared from blood by kidneys. Normal adult creatinine clearance is ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73m^2. (NCT00369382)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus55.39
Sirolimus (SRL)54.47

[back to top]

Calculated Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault Equation) at Baseline

Creatinine clearance at baseline calculated using Cockcroft-Gault equation and adjusted for body surface area. Calculated CC: method to approximate kidney function. It measures rate creatinine (substance formed from metabolism of creatine) is cleared from blood by kidneys. Normal adult creatinine clearance is ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73m^2. (NCT00369382)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus57.09
Sirolimus (SRL)57.75

[back to top]

Annual Change in Calculated Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault Equation)

The change in creatinine clearance over time assessed using the random coefficient slope of the regression line with creatinine clearance as the dependent variable and study day as the independent variable. Time points calculated as study days, relative to time of randomization of study medication. Observed data multiplied by a scale factor of 365 to express an annual change. (NCT00369382)
Timeframe: Baseline to discontinuation (up to Week 52)

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Number)
Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus-0.740
Sirolimus (SRL)1.571

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Calculated Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault Equation) at 4, 16, 24, 32, and 40 Weeks Post-randomization

Creatinine Clearance (CC) calculated using Cockcroft-Gault equation, adjusted for body surface area. Calculated CC: method to approximate kidney function. It measures rate creatinine (substance formed from metabolism of creatine) is cleared from blood by kidneys. Normal adult creatinine clearance is ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73m^2. Change from baseline=CC at Week X minus CC at baseline where higher scores represented improved renal function; Least squares mean adjusted for baseline calculated creatinine clearance and center. (NCT00369382)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 16, 24, 32, and 40

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 16Week 24Week 32Week 40
Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus-0.20-2.16-1.91-0.760.34
Sirolimus (SRL)2.963.792.152.222.70

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection by Severity

Severity of acute rejection summarized using revised 2005 ISHLT criteria. Grade 0R: no rejection, Grade 1R: Focal (perivascular or interstitial) infiltrate without necrosis, diffuse but sparse infiltrate without necrosis, or one focus only with aggressive infiltration and/or focal myocyte damage, Grade 2R:Multifocal aggressive infiltrates and/or myocyte damage, and Grade 3R:Diffuse inflammatory process with necrosis, or diffuse aggressive polymorphous with necrosis, increased infiltrate, changes in edema, hemorrhage and vasculitis. (NCT00369382)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Grade 0R protocol mandatedGrade 0R for causeGrade 0R site protocolGrade 1R protocol mandatedGrade 1R for causeGrade 1R site protocolGrade 2R protocol mandatedGrade 2R for causeGrade 2R site protocolGrade 3R protocol mandatedGrade 3R for causeGrade 3R site protocol
Cyclosporine or TacrolimusNA00NA00NA00NA10
Sirolimus (SRL)000000641111

[back to top]

Time Post Transplant Corticosteroid Withdrawal

The mean days from post transplant corticosteroid withdrawal. (NCT00374231)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventiondays (Mean)
Corticosteroid Withdrawal257

[back to top]

Incidence of Biopsy Confirmed Acute Rejection at 12 Months.

(NCT00374231)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Corticosteroid Withdrawa.5

[back to top]

Patient Survival.

(NCT00374231)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Corticosteroid Withdrawal39

[back to top]

Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Pleocytosis

(NCT00378326)
Timeframe: White blood cell count in CSF was measured at two time points, pre- and post-treatment

Interventioncells/mm^3 (Median)
Pre-treatment3
Post-treatment3

[back to top]

Survival of Patients With Paraneoplastic Disease Who Are Treated With Tacrolimus

Survival in patients with paraneoplastic disease who are treated with Tacrolimus, from time of tacrolimus treatment (NCT00378326)
Timeframe: through study completion, median 3 years of follow up

Interventionmonths (Median)
Tacrolimus48

[back to top]

Estimated Percentage of Participants With Event Free Survival

An event is defined as relapse or transplant-related mortality. Relapse is defined in section 3.3 study protocol. (NCT00382109)
Timeframe: at 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental45
Control54

[back to top]

Relative Contribution of ALL Blasts to the Donor Immune Response as a Cause of Relapse Post Transplantation (Correlating Development of aGVHD With Relapse)

An event is defined as relapse; estimated probability of relapse. (NCT00382109)
Timeframe: At 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experienced aGVHD, later relapsedNo aGVHD occurence, relapsed
All Patients524

[back to top]

Rate of Relapses

An event is defined as relapse. (NCT00382109)
Timeframe: At 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental41
Control33

[back to top] [back to top]

Estimated Rate of Overall Chronic Graft VS Host Disease

Chronic graft vs host disease is defined in APPENDIX III of study protocol. (NCT00382109)
Timeframe: At 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental22
Control27

[back to top]

Estimated Rate of Acute Graft VS Host Disease (GVHD)

Any grade acute graft vs host disease (defined in APPENDIX II study protocol). (NCT00382109)
Timeframe: At 200 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experiemental32
Control49

[back to top] [back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 for Eight Domain Scores of Quality of Life (QoL) Instrument SF-36 - All Randomized Participants

"SF-36 was a Participant-Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Short Form (SF) questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 8 domains of physical and mental component summaries: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, general health perception, and vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health.~All domains were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life." (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Baseline (screening) to Month 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Bodily Pain (n=74,79)General Health (n=75,79)Mental Health (n=73,79)Physical Functioning (n=67,75)Role Emotional (n=75,79)Role Physical (n=75,79)Social Functioning (n=75,79)Vitality (n=73,79)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg0.71.60.7-0.5-1.40.50.90.2
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)0.30.9-0.10.8-0.40.2-0.5-0.2

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Month 6 and to Month 12 in Serum Creatinine - All Randomized Participants

Baseline was value at screening or prior to first dose of study drug. Serum creatinine was measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). Baseline = value at screening. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 Post Randomization

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Month 6 (n=81,82)Month 12 (n=81,86)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg-0.1-0.1
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)-0.0-0.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria From Baseline up to Month 12 - Randomized and Treated Participants

Upper limits of normal (ULL). Leukocytes: < 2.0*10^3 cells per microliter (c/µL); Lymphocytes (absolute): < 0.5*10^3 c/µL; bilirubin: > 3.0*ULN milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL); Potassium: < 3.0 milliequivalents per liter (meq/L) or > 6.0 meq/L; Magnesium >2.6 meq/L; Sodium: < 130 meq/L; Phosphorus: < 2.0 mg/dL; Uric Acid: > 10 mg/dL. Baseline = value at screening. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Leukocytes LowLymphocytes LowBilirubin HighPotassium LowPotassium HighMagnesium HighSodium LowPhosphorus Inorganic LowUric Acid High
Belatacept 5 mg/kg040115154
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)101101126

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Had Any Study Drug Dose Alteration by Month 12 Due to Any Reason - Randomized and Treated Participants

Reasons for study drug dose modification included categories of decline in renal function (as determined by the investigator), treatment of acute rejection, and other reasons. More than 1 reason could be given for dose alteration. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Month 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number with Dose Alteration (Any Reason)Decline in renal functionTreatment of Acute RejectionOther
Belatacept 5 mg/kg150015
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)624061

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Anti-Donor Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Positive Antibodies

Samples were obtained at Day 1 (first dose), Week 24, and Week 52 (or end of therapy). This was a cumulative summary in that once a participant was positive, that participant remained positive for later time points. Evaluation of anti-donor HLA antibodies was performed by an external laboratory (Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia). (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Month 6 and Month 12 Post Randomization

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline (n=80,82)Month 6 (n=82,82Month 12 (n=82, 83)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg333
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)344

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events (AEs) From First Dose up to Month 12

AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: First Dose (Day 1) to Month 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
DeathsSAEsTreatment Related SAEsDiscontinued due to SAEsTreatment Related AEsDiscontinued due to AEs
Belatacept 5 mg/kg02091241
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)11740270

[back to top]

Participants Who Switched From CNI to Belatacept in Long Term Period : Mean Change in Calculated GFR Based on Imputed Values From Day of Switch to Week 96 Post Switch

Calculated GFR assessment used the MDRD formula. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2. For death or graft loss participants, calculated GFR (cGFR) value 10 was used, for other participants who had a post baseline cGFR value missing, but had baseline value and at least 2 post baseline values available, which were at least 120 days apart, linear regression model was used to impute the cGFR value. Day of Switch = the first belatacept infusion day. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Day of Switch (first belatacept dose) to Week 96 Post Switch

InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Week 4 Post Switch (n=30)Week 12 Post Switch (n=33)Week 24 Post Switch (n= 29)Week 48 Post Switch (n= 12)Week 96 Post Switch (n= 8)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg in Participants Switched During LT Period1.33.32.10.30.1

[back to top]

Participants Who Switched to Belatacept in Long Term Period: Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs

AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Day of Switch = the first belatacept infusion day. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Day of Switch (first dose of belatacept ) to last dose plus 56 days, up to Year 6 of the Study

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Belatacept 5 mg/kg in Participants Switched During LT Period329

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft, Have Graft Loss or Death (Graft Loss, Death, Death With Functioning Graft) By Month 6 and Month 12 Post Randomization

Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss. Functional loss was defined as a sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 mg/dL (530 μmol/L) for ≥ 4 weeks or administration of a maintenance dialysis regimen for at least 56 days or impairment of renal function to such a degree that the participant undergoes re-transplantation. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: At 6 and 12 months post randomization

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6 Surviving with Functioning GraftMonth 6 Graft Loss or DeathMonth 6 Graft LossMonth 6 DeathMonth 6 Death with Functioning GraftMonth 12 Surviving with Functioning GraftMonth 12 Graft Loss or DeathMonth 12 Graft LossMonth 12 DeathMonth 12 Death with Functioning Graft
Belatacept 5 mg/kg100.00.00.00.00.0100.00.00.00.00.0
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)98.91.10.01.11.198.91.10.01.11.1

[back to top]

Ridit Score at Month 12 - All Randomized Participants

The Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale (MTSOSD-59R) was used to assess the occurrence (never, occasionally, regularly, almost always, always) and distress (0=no distress to 4=terrible distress) of symptoms associated with immunosuppressive therapies. Ridit (relative to an identified distribution) analysis (Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1991) was used. Ridit scores were calculated at 12 months for overall symptom occurrence score and overall symptom distress. The Ridit score reflects the probability that a score observed for an individual randomly selected from a group would be higher (worse symptom) than a score observed for a randomly selected individual from the reference group. The reference group was constituted by the frequency distribution of the responses of all participants on all items at baseline. The ridit of the reference group is by definition, 0.5. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Month 12

,
InterventionRidit score (Number)
Symptom Distress (n=46,44)Symptom Occurrence (n=46,45)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg0.51620.5074
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)0.50140.4998

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) With Imputed Values to 12 Months Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants (Intent-to-Treat Population)

Calculated GFR assessment used the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2. For death or graft loss participants, calculated GFR (cGFR) value 10 was used, for other participants who had a post baseline cGFR value missing, but had baseline value and at least 2 post baseline values available, which were at least 120 days apart, linear regression model was used to impute the cGFR value. Baseline = value at screening. Randomization/First Dose was on Day 1. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months post randomization

InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg7.0
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)2.1

[back to top]

Long Term Period: Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus Up to Month 36- All Randomized Participants Who Entered LT Period

A participant who did not have diabetes prior to randomization is determined to have new onset diabetes mellitus if they received an antidiabetic medication for a duration of at least 30 days or at least two fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests indicated that FPG is >=126 mg/dL. Percentage was the number of participants with new onset of diabetes mellitus divided by the number of participants without pre-randomization diabetes. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Baseline (screening) up to Month 36 post randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg6.9
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)4.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) by Months 6 and 12 Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants

AR defined: if either a or b was satisfied: a: the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness and the episode was a case of biopsy proven AR (AR of Banff histopathologic classification Grade IA or higher as assessed by the blinded central pathologist); b: the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be something other than: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; the episode was a case of biopsy proven AR, and the participant was treated for this episode. Banff 97 diagnostic category for renal allograft biopsies is an international standardized histopathological classification. AR is defined by a renal biopsy demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: At 6 and 12 months post randomization

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Total Number by Month 6By Month 6 Mild Acute (IA)Month 6 Mild Acute (IB)Month 6 Moderate Acute (IIA)Month 6 Moderate Acute (IIB)Month 6 Severe Acute (III)Total Number by Month 12Month 12 Mild Acute (IA)Month 12 Mild Acute (IB)Month12 Moderate Acute (IIA)Month 12 Moderate Acute (IIB)Month 12 Severe Acute (III)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg611310611310
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)000000000000

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) With Imputed Values to 6 Months Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants (Intent-to-Treat Population)

Calculated GFR assessment used the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2. For death or graft loss participants, calculated GFR (cGFR) value 10 was used, for other participants who had a post baseline cGFR value missing, but had baseline value and at least 2 post baseline values available, which were at least 120 days apart, linear regression model was used to impute the cGFR value. Baseline = value at screening. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months post randomization

InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg6.9
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)1.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Composite Endpoint of Death, Graft Loss and Acute Rejection at Month 12

Percentage=number with composite divided by number randomized. Graft loss was functional loss or physical loss. Functional loss = sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 mg/dL for ≥ 4 weeks or administration of a maintenance dialysis regimen for at least 56 days or impairment of renal function to such a degree that participant undergoes re-transplantation. AR: if either a or b: (a) the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness and the episode was a case of biopsy-proven AR (grade IA or higher as assessed by the blinded central pathologist); (b) the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be something other than: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; the episode was a case of biopsy-proven AR, and the participant was treated for it. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: 12 Months post randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg7.1
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)1.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus - All Randomized Participants

A participant who did not have diabetes prior to randomization is determined to have new onset diabetes mellitus if they received an antidiabetic medication for a duration of at least 30 days or at least two fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests indicated that FPG is >=126 mg/dL. Percentage was the number of participants with new onset of diabetes mellitus divided by the number of participants without pre-randomization diabetes. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Month 12 post randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg1.7
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)2.9

[back to top]

Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to 54 Months Post Randomization in Calculated GFR on Imputed Values at Specified Timepoints - Intent to Treat (ITT) Participants Who Entered LT Period

ITT=participants randomized to their original treatment arm and who entered the LT period are presented. Baseline=value at screening. Calculated GFR assessment used the MDRD formula. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2. For death or graft loss participants, calculated GFR (cGFR) value of 0 was imputed and carried forward after death or graft loss up to the end of the analysis period. Sponsor discontinued the CNI treatment arm in Year 3, and participants treated with CNI could elect to switch to belatacept. If a participant did not switch to belatacept, they were required to discontinue from the study. Therefore, efficacy results from Month 36 through Month 54 are difficult to interpret. No formal comparisons were planned between the belatacept and CNI treatment groups post Month 36, and the data up to the final database lock should be interpreted with caution. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Month 3 (n=81, 81)Month 6 (n=80, 77)Month 12 (n=81, 81)Month 18 (n=81, 75)Month 24 (n=81, 78)Month 30 (n=80, 69)Month 36 (n=57, 52)Month 42 (n=71, 54)Month 48 (n=16, 32)Month 54 (n=14, 26)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg5.17.17.18.88.89.17.79.1-1.7-0.9
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)0.42.32.80.1-0.00.13.90.64.22.4

[back to top]

Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Diastolic Blood Pressure

Blood pressure was measured while the participant was sitting quietly for 5 minutes and was measured in mmHg. Baseline was value at screening. Only those participants who entered long term period were evaluated. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Month 6 (n=78,73)Month 12 (n=77,71)Month 18 (n=77,1)Month 24 (n=77,1)Month 30 (n=75,6)Month 36 (n=75,13)Month 42 (n=74,29)Month 48 (n=73, 32)Month 54 (n=72, 33)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg-2.0-2.5-1.7-3.9-1.8-1.9-1.7-3.2-1.1
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)-2.2-1.010.013.05.7-1.6-3.8-3.6-3.6

[back to top]

Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Serum Creatinine- ITT Participants Who Entered LT Period

Baseline was value at screening. Serum creatinine was measured in mg/dL. Only participants who entered into Long Term Period were included in the analysis. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Month 3 (n=81,81)Month 6 (n=81,77)Month 12 (n=81,81)Month 18 (n=80,75)Month 24 (n=80,77)Month 30 (n=78, 68)Month 36 (n=55, 51)Month 42 (n=68, 53)Month 48 (n=12, 31)Month 54 (n=10, 25)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.2-0.1-0.2-0.2-0.3
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)0.0-0.0-0.00.10.00.0-0.00.0-0.1-0.1

[back to top]

Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Systolic Blood Pressure

Blood pressure was measured while the participant was sitting quietly for 5 minutes and was measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Baseline was value at screening. Only those participants who entered long term period were evaluated. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Month 6 (n=78,73)Month 12 (n=77,71)Month 18 (n=77,1)Month 24 (n=77,1)Month 30 (n=75, 6)Month 36 (n=75,13)Month 42 (n=74, 29)Month 48 (n=73,32)Month 54 (n=72,33)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg-3.6-4.6-4.4-6.0-3.6-6.6-5.4-4.4-4.9
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)-0.4-4.29.04.0-0.51.2-3.5-3.7-3.8

[back to top]

Long Term Period: Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria - All ITT Participants Who Entered the Long Term Period

Upper limits of normal (ULN). Hemoglobin: < 8 g/dL; Platelet count: < 50*10^9 c/L; Leukocytes: < 2.0*10^3 c/µL; Lymphocytes (absolute): < 0.5*10^3 c/µL; Neutrophils: < 1.0*10^3 c/µL; Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): > 5.0*ULN Units per liter (U/L); bilirubin: > 3.0*ULN mg/dL; Creatinine: > 3.0*ULN mg/dL; Calcium: < 7 mg/dL; Bicarbonate: > 12.5 mg/dL; Potassium: < 3.0 meq/L or > 6.0 meq/L; Magnesium >2.6 meq/L; Sodium: < 130 meq/L; Phosphorus: < 2.0 mg/dL; Uric Acid: > 10 mg/dL. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Baseline (Screening), up to Year 6 of the Study

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hemoglobin LowPlatelet Count LowLeukocytes LowLymphocytes LowNeutrophils LowALT HighBilirubin HighCreatinine HighCalcium LowBicarbonate LowPotassium LowPotassium HighMagnesium HighSodium LowPhosphorus Inorganic LowUric Acid High
Belatacept 5 mg/kg1105100000216277
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)0115211121131137

[back to top]

Long Term Period: Number of Participants Who Survived With a Functioning Graft or Survived With Pure Graft Loss or Death With Functioning Graft - ITT Participants Who Entered the LT Period

Graft loss = either pure graft loss (participant survived to the end of the study period after graft loss) or death with functioning graft. Pure graft loss = either functional loss or physical loss. Functional loss = a sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 mg/dL (530 μmol/L) for ≥ 4 weeks or administration of a maintenance dialysis regimen for at least 56 days or impairment of renal function to such a degree that the participant undergoes re-transplantation. The table was designed with built-in redundancy to capture all possible combinations of death and/or graft loss, but not all lines can be summed to reach the total number surviving and the total number who die and/or lose grafts. If a participant experiences pure graft loss and dies at a later date independent of the graft loss event, they are counted only once in the cumulative tabulation of death or graft loss. Only the first event experienced by the participant counted toward the cumulative total. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Post Months 24, 36, 48, up to Year 6 of the Study

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 24 Surviving with Functioning GraftMonth 24 Graft Loss or DeathMonth 24 Graft LossMonth 24 DeathMonth 36 Surviving with Functioning GraftMonth 36 Graft Loss or DeathMonth 36 Graft LossMonth 36 DeathMonth 36 Death with Functioning GraftMonth 48 Surviving with Functioning GraftMonth 48 Graft Loss or DeathMonth 48 Graft LossMonth 48 DeathMonth 48 Death with Functioning Graftup to year 6 Surviving with Functioning Graftup to year 6 Graft Loss or Deathup to year 6 Graft Lossup to year 6, Deathup to year 6 Death with Functioning Graft
Belatacept 5 mg/kg80110792111783122765144
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)80110801100801100801100

[back to top]

Long Term Period: Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) - All Randomized Participants in LT Period

AR was defined: if either a or b was satisfied: (a) the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness and the episode was a case of biopsy proven AR (AR of Banff histopathologic classification grade IA or higher as assessed by the blinded central pathologist); (b) the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be something other than: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; the episode was a case of biopsy proven AR, and the participant was treated for this episode. Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology was used to categorize the severity of the AR. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Post Month 12 up to Year 6 of the Study

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Total NumberMild Acute IAMild Acute IBModerate Acute IIAModerate Acute IIBSevere Acute III
Belatacept 5 mg/kg501310
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)401210

[back to top]

Long Term Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest - All Randomized Participants Who Entered the Long Term Period

Prospectively identified events of special interest which were a subset of all AEs, and were either SAEs or non-serious AEs, included the following categories: Serious Infections, Thrombolic/embolic events, Autoimmune Disease, Malignancy, Peri-infusional reactions (only belatacept treatment group was IV) , Acute Peri-infusional events occurring within 24 hours of injection, Pulmonary Edema and Congestive Heart Failure. AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: First dose after randomization (Day 1) to last dose, plus 56 days, up to Year 6 of the Study

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
MalignanciesSerious InfectionsThrombolic/embolicPeri-infusional EventsAcute Peri-infusional EventsAutoimmune DiseasePulmonary Edema/Congestive Heart Failure
Belatacept 5 mg/kg826337523
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)92600012

[back to top]

Long Term Period: Number of Participants With SAEs, Death, Discontinuation Due to AEs - All Randomized Participants Who Entered the Long Term Period

AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: First dose after randomization (Day 1) to 56 days post last dose, up to Year 6 of the Study

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
DeathsSAEsTreatment Related SAEsDiscontinued Due to SAEsTreatment Related AEsDiscontinued Due to AEs
Belatacept 5 mg/kg445181381
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)040142433

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in SF-36 Questionnaire Physical Component Score and in Mental Component Score at Month 12 - All Randomized Participants

SF-36 was a Participant-Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Short Form (SF) questionnaire. The subscale in the mental component (MCS) part of the instrument ranged from 1 to 6 with 1=all of the time and 6= none of the time. The subscale for physical component (PCS) ranged from 1 to 3 with 1=Yes, limited a lot and 3=No, not limited at all. The subscale for the extent that physical health or emotional problems interfered with normal activities ranged from 1 to 5 with 1=not at all and 5= extremely. Baseline was at randomization or prior to first dose. Baseline = value at screening. The subscale scores were transformed using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. (NCT00402168)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
MCS (n=64, 75)PCS (n=64, 75)
Belatacept 5 mg/kg0.30.5
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)-0.70.8

[back to top]

Time to Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment

Neutrophil engraftment is defined as achieving an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) > 500/mcL for three consecutive measurements on different days. Platelet engraftment is defined as a platelet count > 20,000/mcL for three consecutive measurements over three or more days. (NCT00406393)
Timeframe: Measured through Day 100

,
Interventiondays (Median)
Neutrophil EngraftmentPlatelet Engraftment
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate1619
Tacrolimus/Sirolimus1416

[back to top]

Rate of Grades II-IV Acute GVHD-free Survival

The primary objective is to compare rates of 114-day Grades II-IV acute GVHD-free survival post randomization for HLA-matched, related donor allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation using two different GVHD prophylaxis regimens. Participants are graded on a scale of 1 to 4 according to their symptoms and organs involved, where 4 represents a worse grade. (NCT00406393)
Timeframe: Day 114

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Sirolimus67
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate62

[back to top]

Rate of Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)

VOD will be defined as the occurrence of VOD (based on the Baltimore Criteria for the diagnosis of VOD) in conjunction with other end-organ dysfunction. (NCT00406393)
Timeframe: Measured through Day 100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Sirolimus11
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate5

[back to top]

Incidence of Acute GVHD

Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD (grade II-IV) occurring 100 days from transplantation. (NCT00406393)
Timeframe: Measured at Day 100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Sirolimus26
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate34

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT00406393)
Timeframe: Measured at Year 2

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Sirolimus59
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate63

[back to top]

Reactivation of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection

(NCT00406393)
Timeframe: Measured at Year 2

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Sirolimus13
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate15

[back to top]

Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) Infection

The occurrence of TMA within the first 100 days after stem cell transplantation will be recorded. The first day of onset will be used for reporting purposes. (NCT00406393)
Timeframe: Measured through Day 100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Sirolimus5
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate1

[back to top]

Malignant Disease Relapse

Testing for recurrent malignancy in the blood, marrow or other sites will be used to assess relapse after transplantation. For the purpose of this study, relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of AML, ALL, CML, MDS or CMML consistent with pre-transplant features. (NCT00406393)
Timeframe: Measured at Year 2

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Sirolimus28
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate29

[back to top] [back to top]

Mucositis Severity

Mucositis severity will be scored per the modified Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS) scoring system on a scale of 0 - 4, where 0 equals normal mucosa and 4 represents severe mucosa. (NCT00406393)
Timeframe: Measured at Day 21

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tacrolimus/Sirolimus0.31
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate0.47

[back to top]

Participants Evaluated for Early Post-transplant Regimen-related Severe Morbidity (Grade III to IV Nonhematologic Toxicity) and Mortality as Measured by the NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program CTCAE v 3.0

(NCT00423514)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Level 1: Clofarabine at 20 mg/m^2/Dose x 5 + THIO-MEL31
Dose Level 2: Clofarabine at 30 mg/m^2/Dose x 5 + THIO-MEL7

[back to top]

Incidence of Grades III-IV GVHD

"To determine the incidence and severity of GVHD in these patients using a combination of cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as GVHD prophylaxis.'~Severity was graded using CTCAE 3.0 (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=life threatening/disabling, 5=death)" (NCT00429143)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haploidentical Allogeneic Transplantation2

[back to top]

Lymphoid Recovery

To assess the pace of lymphoid recovery in this patient population. (NCT00429143)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haploidentical Allogeneic Transplantation23

[back to top]

Optimal Dose of CD3+ Donor Lymphocytes (T-cells) for Consistent Engraftment Without GVHD

"To determine the optimal dose of CD3+ donor lymphocytes required for consistent engraftment without the development of grade III/IV GVHD.~Measured as CD3+ donor lymphocytes given as n x 10^8/kg.~n was found to be 2 and was found to be the optimal dose and was the only dose given." (NCT00429143)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionlymphocytes x 10^8/kg (Number)
Haploidentical Allogeneic Transplantation2

[back to top]

Overall Survival of Participants

To determine overall survival at 6 months post-transplant. (NCT00429143)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haploidentical Allogeneic Transplantation13

[back to top]

Engraftment Rates

To assess hematopoietic engraftment rates. (NCT00429143)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haploidentical Allogeneic Transplantation23

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host-Disease (GVHD)

Determine the incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD after administration of grafts when combined with Cyclosporine/Mycophenolate Mofetil for GVHD prophylaxis. GVHD assessments occur daily as an in patient and at each out patient visit. (NCT00429416)
Timeframe: Through 24 months post-treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Developed grade II-IV GVHDDeveloped cGVHD (Chronic GVHD)
LLME to Decrease GVHD Following HSC T31

[back to top]

Safety of CD34+ Stem Cell Infusions Followed by LLME as Measured by 100-Day Mortality

"Determine the safety of CD34+ stem cell infusions followed by the LLME treated CD34- fraction. This includes monitoring the patients for any side effects associated with the LLME treated cell infusion or any other unexpected adverse events.~This regimen will be gauged as to its safety using 100 day mortality as the measured endpoint. Deaths from all causes will be included." (NCT00429416)
Timeframe: Through 100 days post-transplant or death

Interventionparticipants (Number)
LLME to Decrease GVHD Following HSC T1

[back to top]

Rate of Serious Infectious Complications

"Determine the rate of serious infectious complications. A serious infection will be defined as any requiring hospitalization or parenteral therapy.~CD4 counts will be measured monthly for the first 3 months after transplant." (NCT00429416)
Timeframe: Through 3 months post-transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
LLME to Decrease GVHD Following HSC T2

[back to top]

Rate of Engraftment of Non-Myeloablative Transplants

Determine the engraftment rate of non-myeloablative transplants using CD34+ stem cells and LLME treated CD34- products. (NCT00429416)
Timeframe: Through 30 days post-transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
LLME to Decrease GVHD Following HSC T13

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Achieve a CD4 Count > 200/Micro-liters

Determine the number of patients who achieve a CD4 count > 200/micro-liters by 60 days after transplant. (NCT00429416)
Timeframe: Through 60 Days Post Transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
LLME to Decrease GVHD Following HSC T13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

To determine the maximum tolerated dose(MTD) of velcade and dose limiting toxicity(DLT). A dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as a grade 3-4 neurological toxicity, graft failure, or death due to GvHD. The Commom Terminlogy Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 was used. (NCT00439556)
Timeframe: From start of treatment to 90 days after the start of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Transplant, Filgrastim, Tacrolimus)0
Velcade Dose Level 20
Velcade Dose Level 30

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival

To determine DFS at 1 year post transplant. (NCT00439556)
Timeframe: At 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Velcade Dose Level 116
Velcade Dose Level 20
Velcade Dose Level 30

[back to top]

Non-relapse Mortality (NRM) (Patients With AML/MDS)

Cumulative incidence rate with death as a competing risk, assessed at day 100. (NCT00445744)
Timeframe: Up to day 200

Interventionpercent (Number)
Treatment (Cyclophosphamide, Busulfan, Transplant)17

[back to top] [back to top]

Plasma C-peptide

Level of plasma C-peptide at 1 year after the first transplant (NCT00446264)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Single Arm Group1.7

[back to top]

Composite Criteria: Insulin Independence and Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Under 6.5% at One Year

The percentage of insulin independents subjects with an HbA1c less than 6.5% at one year after last transplant (NCT00446264)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionPercentage of patients (Mean)
Single Arm Group71

[back to top]

HbA1c < 6.5%

The percentage of subjects with HbA1c < 6.5% at 1 year after the first transplant (NCT00446264)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Mean)
Single Arm Group64.3

[back to top]

Hypoglycemic Events

Percentage of subjects free of severe hypoglycemic events from day 0 to day 365 with the day of transplant designated day 0 (NCT00446264)
Timeframe: day 0 to day 365

InterventionPercentage of patients (Mean)
Single Arm Group0

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events

The number of adverse events related to the procedure and to the immunosuppression (NCT00446264)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionnumber events (Number)
Single Arm Group33

[back to top]

Percentage of Time Spent in Hypoglycemia (<0.70 mg/L)

percentage of time spent in hypoglycemia derived from CGMS (Continuous Glucose Monitoring System) (NCT00446264)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of time (Mean)
Single Arm Group11.37

[back to top]

Graft-vs-host Disease at 6 Months Post-transplant

"Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) can be mild, moderate or severe depending on the differences in tissue type between patient and donor. Its symptoms can include:~Rashes, which include burning and redness, that erupt on the palms or soles and may spread to the trunk and eventually to the entire body~Blistering, causing the exposed skin surface to flake off in severe cases~Nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, diarrhea and loss of appetite, which can indicate that the gastrointestinal (digestive) tract is affected~Jaundice, or a yellowing of the skin, which can indicate liver damage~Excessive dryness of the mouth and throat, leading to ulcers~Dryness of the lungs, vagina and other surfaces~Acute GVHD - Can occur soon after the transplanted cells begin to appear in the recipient. Acute GVHD ranges from mild, moderate or severe, and can be life-threatening if its effects are not controlled.~Extensive chronic GVHD - Usually occurs at about three months post-transplant." (NCT00448201)
Timeframe: 6 Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Acute GVHDExtensive Chronic GVHD
All Trial Participants1330

[back to top]

Complete or Mixed Donor Chimerism at 30, 60, and 90 Days Post-transplant

"Complete chimerism is defined as 100% donor cells detected, suggesting complete hematopoietic replacement. Mixed donor chimerism means host cells are detected in particular cells like lymphocytes. Five to 90% donor cells set the criteria for mixed chimerism (MC).~Chimerism was not tabulated on day 30." (NCT00448201)
Timeframe: Days 30, 60, and 90

,
Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Complete DonorMixed Donor
Day 608218
Day 908713

[back to top]

5-year Disease-free Survival

The length of time post-transplant that the patient survives without any signs or symptoms of that cancer. (NCT00448201)
Timeframe: Year 5

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
All Trial Participants31

[back to top] [back to top]

Incidence of DNA Chimerism in Patients Between One Month Post Transplant

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) chimerism is a measure identifying the genetic profiles of the transplant recipient and of the donor and then evaluating the extent of mixture in the recipient's blood, bone marrow, or other tissue. (NCT00448357)
Timeframe: 30 days post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Whole blood chimerism-AnyWhole blood chimerism->=95% donorT Cell chimerism-AnyT Cell chimerism>=95% donor
Experimental: GVHD Prophylaxis49474630

[back to top]

Three-year Relapse-free Survival (RFS) Rate at the Maximum Tolerated Dose Identified During Phase I of the Trial (Target AUC 6912)

Relapse is defined as new or increased sites of disease or positive one marrow after a complete response (CR). The RFS was calculated as the percentage of patients who were alive and without relapse at 3 years (NCT00448357)
Timeframe: Three years post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Low Busulfan AUC Tertile22
Intermediate Busulfan AUC Tertile39
High Busulfan AUC Tertile43

[back to top]

Incidence of Graft vs Host Disease in Patients Between One Month and Two Years Post Transplant

"GVHD can be mild, moderate or severe depending on the differences in tissue type between patient and donor. GVHD can be acute or chronic. Its symptoms can include:~Rashes, which include burning and redness, that erupt on the palms or soles and may spread to the trunk and eventually to the entire body~Blistering, causing the exposed skin surface to flake off in severe cases~Nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, diarrhea and loss of appetite, which can indicate that the gastrointestinal (digestive) tract is affected~Jaundice, or a yellowing of the skin, which can indicate liver damage~Excessive dryness of the mouth and throat, leading to ulcers~Dryness of the lungs, vagina and other surfaces" (NCT00448357)
Timeframe: 100 days post transplant

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Acute GVHD grade >=IIAcute GVHD grades III and IVChronic GVHD; intermediate/severe
High Busulfan AUC Tertile1132
Intermediate Busulfan AUC Tertile1046
Low Busulfan AUC Tertile724

[back to top]

Capacity of Test Dosing of Busulfan That Would Result in the Desired Area Under the Curve Concentration Exposure of Patients Receiving a Full-dose Busulfan Regimen

Test doses of busulfan were administered and plasma levels were measured to determine a targeted AUC dosing estimate. The capacity is reported as the precision with which these test dose goals predicted the actual 90-hour mean AUC levels.Dose targeting precision was estimated by root mean squared error. (NCT00448357)
Timeframe: Day -15 to Day -11

Interventionpercentage of error (Number)
Dose Level 111.7
Dose Level 24.9
Dose Level 310.2
Dose Level 411.1
Dose Level 515.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

Dose limiting toxicity will be defined as any irreversible grade 3 or any grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity that is related to busulfan infusion and not graft vs host disease or late infection after recovery from the initial period of myelosuppression. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is defined as the dose with probability of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of 0.25. The dose of continuous infusion IV busulfan based on blood levels derived from a test dose in conjunction with fludarabine and alemtuzumab plus tacrolimus for GVHD prophylaxis. (NCT00448357)
Timeframe: first 6 weeks or 42 days following stem cell infusion

InterventionDLTs (Number)
Dose Level 11
Dose Level 21
Dose Level 31
Dose Level 42
Dose Level 52

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Percentage of participants alive at 3 years post transplant (NCT00448357)
Timeframe: Three years post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Low Busulfan AUC Tertile (5078)28
Intermediate Busulfan AUC Tertile (6372)39
High Busulfan AUC Tertile (7605)55

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Acute Rejection of Transplant up to End of Month 48 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population in Long Term Extension

AR defined as a clinicopathological event requiring clinical evidence and biopsy confirmation by central pathologist. One or more conditions were met and a renal biopsy revealed histologic evidence of rejection: unexplained rise of serum creatine (SCr) >= 25 % from baseline plus one or more of the following: unexplained decreased urine output; fever and graft tenderness; a SCr that remained elevated within 14 days after transplantation and clinical suspicion of AR; reason other than those listed and participant was treated for this episode. Day 1 was day of transplantation. Banff grade used Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology. ITT population was all randomized and transplanted participants. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: End of Month 12 to end of Month 48 Post Transplantation

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)0
Belatacept, Sirolimus0
Tacrolimus, MMF0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Were Both Calcineurin Inhibitor-free (CNI-free)and Corticosteroid-free at Months 24, 36, 48 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population in Long Term Extension

Participants were considered corticosteroid-free at Months 24, 36, and 48 if they were not receiving corticosteroids for >7 consecutive days during Day 701 and Day 756, Day 1065 and Day 1120, as well as Day 1429 and Day 1484, respectively. Participants were considered CNI-free at Months 24, 36, and 48 if they were not receiving CNI during Day 701 and Day 756, Day 1065 and Day 1120, as well as Day 1429 and Day 1484, respectively. Participants in the tacrolimus arm were not relevant to this analysis because tacrolimus is a calcinurin inhibitor. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: Months 24, 36, 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 24 (N=27, 18, 27)Month 36 (N=26, 16, 23)Month 48 (N=19, 14, 16)
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)222216
Belatacept, Sirolimus151412
Tacrolimus, MMF000

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Were Corticosteroid-free at Months 6 and 12 and Number of Participants Who Were Both Calcineurin Inhibitor-free (CNI-free)and Corticosteroid-free at Months 6 and 12 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population

Participants were said to be CNI-free at Month 6 or 12 if they were not receiving a CNI during Day 141 to Day 196, or Day 337 to Day 392. Participants in the tacrolimus arm were not relevant to this analysis because tacrolimus is a calcinurin inhibitor. Participants were corticosteroid-free (CS-free) at Month 6 if they were not receiving corticosteroids for > 7 consecutive days during Days 141 through Days 196, and at Month 12 if not receiving corticosteroids for > 7 days during Days 337 through 392. Day 1 was day of transplantation. Intent to treat population included all randomized and transplanted participants. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Month 12 post transplantation

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CS-free Month 6 (N=33, 26, 30)CS-free Month 12 (N=32, 26, 30)CNI-free + CS-free Month 6 (N=32, 26, 30)CNI -free + CS-free Month 12 (N=32,26,30)
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)27242524
Belatacept, Sirolimus23201918
Tacrolimus, MMF282811

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Graft Loss or Death at Months 24, 36, 48 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population in Long Term Extension

Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss. Functional loss was defined as either: sustained level of SCr greater than or equal to (>=) 6.0 mg/dL (530 micromoles/Liter; micromol/L) for >= 4 weeks as determined by the local laboratory; regularly scheduled dialysis treatments over a period of 56 days; impairment of renal function to such a degree that the participant undergoes re-transplant. Day 1 was day of transplantation. ITT population defined as all participants randomized and transplanted. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: End of Month 12 to end of Long Term Extension (Year 4)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Graft Loss or Death at Month 24 (N=27,19,27)Graft Loss or Death at Month 36 (N=27,19,27)Graft Loss or Death at Month 48 (N=27,19,27)
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)011
Belatacept, Sirolimus122
Tacrolimus, MMF000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Graft Loss or Death up to Month 6 and Month 12 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population

Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss. Functional loss was defined as either: sustained level of SCr greater than or equal to (>=) 6.0 mg/dL (530 micromoles/Liter; micromol/L) for >= 4 weeks as determined by the local laboratory; regularly scheduled dialysis treatments over a period of 56 days; impairment of renal function to such a degree that the participant undergoes re-transplant. Day 1 was day of transplantation. ITT population defined as all participants randomized and transplanted. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Month 6 and Month 12 post transplantation

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Graft loss up to Month 6 post transplantationGraft loss up to Month 12 post transplantationDeath up to Month 6 post transplantationDeath up to Month 12 post transplantation
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)1211
Belatacept, Sirolimus1200
Tacrolimus, MMF0000

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline (BL) to Month 12 Post Transplantation in Lipid Values - Intent to Treat Population

Baseline (BL) was value obtained day prior to transplantation. Lipid values measured in milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) included: high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides. Intent to treat population included all participants randomized and transplanted. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
HDL-C change from BL to Month 12Non-HDL-C change from BL to Month 12LDL-C change from BL to Month 12Total cholesterol change from BL to Month 12Triglycerides change from BL to Month 12
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)1.516.023.917.5-11.4
Belatacept, Sirolimus-3.716.125.012.5-1.1
Tacrolimus, MMF-0.520.534.020.0-14.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Acute Rejection of Transplant up to Month 12 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population

AR defined as a clinicopathological event requiring clinical evidence and biopsy confirmation by central pathologist. One or more conditions were met and a renal biopsy revealed histologic evidence of rejection: unexplained rise of serum creatine (SCr) >= 25 % from baseline plus one or more of the following: unexplained decreased urine output; fever and graft tenderness; a SCr that remained elevated within 14 days after transplantation and clinical suspicion of AR; reason other than those listed and participant was treated for this episode. Day 1 was day of transplantation. Banff grade used Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology. ITT population was all randomized and transplanted participants. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Month 12 post transplantation

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Total number of participants with ARMild Acute IAMild Acute IBModerate Acute IIAModerate Acute IIB
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)50032
Belatacept, Sirolimus10001
Tacrolimus, MMF10010

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Composite of Death, Graft Loss and Acute Rejection up to Month 6 - Intent to Treat Population

Participants with graft loss or death prior to Month 6 were considered having an event of AR, therefore, the incidence of AR was reported as a composite of AR, death, and graft loss. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Month 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)6
Belatacept, Sirolimus2
Tacrolimus, MMF1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Switched Between MMF and Sirolimus During Long Term Extension up to Study Completion

Long Term extension was the period from the end of Month 12 to the end of Month 48 post transplantation and the completion of the study 31 July 2012. At any time in the study, participants who were unable to tolerate MMF in the Bela-MMF and Tac-MMF groups could discontinue (DC) MMF and switch to sirolimus and remain in the study and those in the Bela-Siro group who were unable to tolerate sirolimus could DC sirolimus and switch to MMF and remain in the study. Study completion=data base (DB) lock. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: End of Month 12 to end of Study (Month 48)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
By Month 24 Switched between MMF and SirolimusBy Month 36 Switched between MMF and SirolimusBy Month 48 Switched between MMF and SirolimusUp to DB Lock Switched between MMF and Sirolimus
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)0000
Belatacept, Sirolimus1233
Tacrolimus, MMF0000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Composite of Death, Graft Loss and Acute Rejection up to Month 12 - Intent to Treat Population

Subjects with graft loss or death prior to Month 12 were considered having an event of AR, therefore, the incidence of AR was reported as a composite of AR, death, and graft loss. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Month 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)7
Belatacept, Sirolimus3
Tacrolimus, MMF1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) of Transplant up to 6 Months Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat (ITT) Population

AR is clinicopathological event requiring clinical evidence and biopsy confirmation by central pathologist. One or more conditions were met and a renal biopsy revealed histologic evidence of rejection: unexplained rise of serum creatine (SCr) greater than or equal to 25% from baseline plus one or more of the following: unexplained decreased urine output; fever, graft tenderness; SCr that remained elevated 14 days post-transplantation and clinical suspicion of AR; other reason and participant treated for episode. Day 1=transplantation. Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology: Type I=tubulointerstitial AR without arteritis (IA: interstitial infiltration with >25% of parenchyma affected and moderate tubulitis with >4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section; IB: >10 mononuclear cells; Type II vascular AR with (IA) intimal arteritis (IIA=mild - moderate; IIB=severe; Type III=severe rejection with transmural arterial changes, necrosis of smooth muscle cells. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Month 6 post-transplantation

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Total Number of Participants with ARMild Acute IAMild Acute IBModerate Acute IIAModerate Acute IIB
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)40021
Belatacept, Sirolimus10001
Tacrolimus, MMF10010

[back to top]

Number of Participants Using Antihyperlipidemic Medications at Month 12 - Intent to Treat Population

Participants using > = 1 antihyperlipidemic medication at Month 12. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)11
Belatacept, Sirolimus10
Tacrolimus, MMF9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Delayed Graft Function - Intent to Treat Population

Delayed graft function (DGF) is defined as participant requiring dialysis within the first week (Day 1-8) post transplantation. Participants losing their graft less than 48 hours post transplant and receiving chronic dialysis were not considered as having DGF. Day 1 was day of transplantation. Intent to treat population defined as all participants randomized and transplanted (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: From Day 1 up to and including Day 8 post transplantation

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)6
Belatacept, Sirolimus4
Tacrolimus, MMF2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus From Baseline to Month 12 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population

"Baseline defined as day before transplantation. A participant who did not have diabetes prior to randomization and received an antidiabetic medication for a duration of at least 30 days or a participant who meets the following criteria and did not have diabetes prior to randomization: Symptoms of diabetes plus casual plasma glucose (PG) concentration ≥ 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L); or fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L); or 2-hour PG ≥ 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) during an oral glucose tolerance test and a confirmatory laboratory test based on measurements of venous PG must have been done on another day in the absence of unequivocal hyperglycemia accompanied by acute metabolic decompensation.~Intent to treat population included all participants randomized and transplanted." (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)0
Belatacept, Sirolimus2
Tacrolimus, MMF1

[back to top]

Mean (Standard Deviation) in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) mL/Min/1.73m^2 at Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population

Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) in mg/dL; Albumin (Alb) in g/dL;Serum creatinine (SCr) in mg/dL; Age in years. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated based upon serum creatinine (SCr) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula as suggested by Levey et al: MDRD GFR = 170 x [SCr/0.95]^(-0.999) x [Age]^(-0.176) x [0.762 if participant was female] x [1.180 if participant was black] x [BUN]^(-0.170) x [Alb]^(+0.318). Intent to Treat (ITT) population is defined as all participants randomized and transplanted. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: Months 3, 6 and 12 post transplantation

,,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Month 3 post transplantation(n=29,24,27)Month 6 post transplantation(n=29,24,25)Month 12 post transplantation(n=27, 23, 29)
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)57.857.563.6
Belatacept, Sirolimus60.558.761.8
Tacrolimus, MMF51.251.754.0

[back to top]

Mean (Standard Deviation) in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) mL/Min/1.73m^2 at Months 24, 36 and 48 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population in Long Term Extension

GFR was calculated based upon serum creatinine (SCr) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula as suggested by Levey et al: MDRD GFR = 170 x [SCr/0.95]^(-0.999) x [Age]^(-0.176) x [0.762 if participant was female] x [1.180 if participant was black] x [BUN]^(-0.170) x [Alb]^(+0.318). Age in years, Alb = Albumin in g/dL; SCr = in mg/dL; BUN =Blood urea nitrogen in mg/dL. Intent to Treat population is defined as all participants randomized and transplanted. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: Months 24, 36 and 48 post transplantation

,,
InterventionmL/Min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Month 24 (N=27, 18, 27)Month 36 (N=25, 16, 22)Month 48 (N=18, 14, 15)
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)60.662.859.6
Belatacept, Sirolimus66.069.972.2
Tacrolimus, MMF52.255.555.7

[back to top]

Mean Systolic, Diastolic and Arterial Blood Pressure at Baseline and Month 12 - Intent to Treat Population

Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressures were measured in millimeters of mercury (mm Hg). Baseline was defined as value obtained before transplantation. Intent to treat population included all participants randomized and transplanted. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months post transplantation

,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Systolic blood pressure at baselineSystolic blood pressure at Month 12Diastolic blood pressure at baselineDiastolic blood pressure at Month 12Mean Arterial pressure at baselineMean Arterial pressure at Month 12
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)133.1129.378.673.396.891.9
Belatacept, Sirolimus126.9131.072.375.190.593.7
Tacrolimus, MMF141.8138.275.377.697.597.8

[back to top]

Number of Corticosteroid-free Participants at 6 and 12 Months Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population

Participants were said to be corticosteroid-free at Month 6 if they were not receiving corticosteroids for greater than (>) 7 consecutive days during Days 141 through Days 196, and at Month 12 if not receiving corticosteroids for > 7 days during Days 337 through 392. Intent to treat population included all randomized and transplanted participants. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Month 12

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
At 6 Months post transplantationAt 12 Months post transplantation
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)2724
Belatacept, Sirolimus2320
Tacrolimus, MMF2828

[back to top]

Number of Corticosteroid-free Participants at Months 24, 36, 48 Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population in Long Term Extension

In the LTE, a participant was considered corticosteroid-free if they were not receiving corticosteroids for >7 consecutive days during Day 701 and Day 756, Day 1065 and Day 1120, as well as Day 1429 and Day 1484, respectively. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: End of Month 12 to end of Long Term Extension (Year 4)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 24 (N=27, 18, 27)Month 36 (N=26, 16, 23)Month 48 (N=19, 14, 16)
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)222216
Belatacept, Sirolimus151412
Tacrolimus, MMF252016

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Used Anti-hypertension Medications at Baseline and at 12 Months Post Transplantation - Intent to Treat Population

Baseline was defined as day prior to transplantation. Number of anti-hypertension medications taken were categorized from 1 to 6 and greater than (>)6. Intent to treat population included all participants randomized and transplanted. (NCT00455013)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Total using at least 1 medication at baselineTotal using at least 1 medication at Month 12Participants using 1 medication at baselineParticipants using 1 medication at Month 12Participants using 2 medications at baselineParticipants using 2 medications at Month 12Participants using 3 medications at baselineParticipants using 3 medications at Month 12Participants using 4 medications at baselineParticipants using 4 medications at Month 12Participants using 5 medications at baselineParticipants using 5 medications at Month 12Participants using 6 medications at baselineParticipants using 6 medications at Month 12Participants using >6 medications at baselineParticipants using >6 medications at Month 12
Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)31251011568631302100
Belatacept, Sirolimus242095585522102000
Tacrolimus, MMF2820548138033201010

[back to top]

Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics (Tmax) Was Measured at Day 21.

Tmax was measured at day 21 (Cmin was measured as part of the primary outcome). (NCT00496483)
Timeframe: 21 days

Interventionhour (Mean)
LCP-Tacro6.00

[back to top]

Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Trough Levels (C24).

Patients had a baseline trough level (C24) measured at day 7 before conversion to LCP-Tacro. (NCT00496483)
Timeframe: 7 days

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Prograf7.00

[back to top]

Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC 0-24).

Patients had a baseline AUC measured (0 to 24 hours) at day 7 before conversion to LCP-Tacro. (NCT00496483)
Timeframe: 7 days

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
Prograf218.82

[back to top]

Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC 0-24).

Patients were converted from Prograf to LCP-Tacro on day 7. On day 21, AUC was measured (0 to 24 hours). (NCT00496483)
Timeframe: 21 days

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
LCP-Tacro218.03

[back to top]

Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Exposure Trough Levels (C24).

Patients were converted from Prograf to LCP-Tacro on day 7. On day 21, a trough level (C24) was measured. (NCT00496483)
Timeframe: 21 days

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
LCP-Tacro6.94

[back to top]

Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics (Fluctuation and Swing) Was Measured at Day 7.

Degree og fluctuation and degree of swing was measured as baseline at day 7 (Cmin was measured as part of the primary outcome). (NCT00496483)
Timeframe: 7 days

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
FluctuationSwing
Prograf127.41174.55

[back to top]

Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics (Fluctuation and Swing) Was Measured at Day 21.

Degree og fluctuation and degree of swing was measured at day 21 (Cmin was measured as part of the primary outcome). (NCT00496483)
Timeframe: 21 days

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
FluctuationSwing
LCP-Tacro77.04110.07

[back to top]

Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics (Cmax and Cavg) Was Measured at Day 7.

Cmax and Cavg was measured at baseline day 7 (Cmin was measured as part of the primary outcome). (NCT00496483)
Timeframe: 7 days

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
CmaxCavg
Prograf19.149.12

[back to top]

Safety Evaluation

A combination of deaths, graft failure and biopsy proven acute rejections (BPAR) was used to evaluate the safety. (NCT00496483)
Timeframe: 52 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
DeathGraft failureBPAR
LCP-Tacro000

[back to top]

Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics (Tmax) Was Measured at Day 7.

Tmax was measured at baseline day 7 (Cmin was measured as part of the primary outcome). (NCT00496483)
Timeframe: 7 days

Interventionhour (Mean)
Prograf1.82

[back to top]

Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics (Cmax and Cavg) Was Measured at Day 21.

Cmax and Cavg was measured at day 21 (Cmin was measured as part of the primary outcome). (NCT00496483)
Timeframe: 21 days

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
CmaxCavg
LCP-Tacro13.949.08

[back to top]

Participants' With mCR Response to Post Transplant Imatinib Mesylate Therapy

Number of participants with response of molecular complete remission (mCR) to Imatinib Mesylate therapy as treatment for residual disease after transplant. Molecular remission is a complete remission with no evidence of disease in the blood cells and/or bone marrow using sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. (NCT00499889)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Mesylate, Busulfan, Fludarabine + Antithymocyte Globulin10

[back to top]

Participants' With mCR Response to Post Transplant DLI

Number of participants with response of molecular complete remission (mCR) to DLI as treatment for residual disease after transplant. Molecular remission is a complete remission with no evidence of disease in the blood cells and/or bone marrow using sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. (NCT00499889)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Mesylate, Busulfan, Fludarabine + Antithymocyte Globulin4

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Complete Molecular Remission at 1 Year

Participants at 1 year in molecular remission, post transplant, post imatinib mesylate and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). Molecular remission is a complete remission with no evidence of disease in the blood cells and/or bone marrow using sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests (this test is most commonly used in clinical trials). (NCT00499889)
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Mesylate, Busulfan, Fludarabine + Antithymocyte Globulin21

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Patients were considered to have reached the progression if they died, or if they met all the following criteria; (1) ≥10% decline from baseline FVC or ≥15mmHg increase in baseline resting P(A-a)O2, (2) a worsening of interstitial pneumonitis findings by chest CT compared to the most recent study, confirmed by a radiologist, and (3) exclusion of pneumocystis pneumonia, cytomegalovirus pneumonia, and other pulmonary infection on clinical ground. (NCT00504348)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Prospective Investigation Group76.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the day on which the protocol treatment was started until death due to any cause. Participants still alive were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. (NCT00504348)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Prospective Investigation Group88.0

[back to top]

Number of Patients Without GVHD at 100 Days

The primary efficacy endpoint of escalating doses Pentostatin with Tacrolimus + Methotrexate is success, defined to be that the patient is alive, engrafted, and without acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 100 days. (NCT00506922)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pentostatin100

[back to top]

Uric Acid Levels

Blood was collected and analyzed at a laboratory for serum uric acid levels reported in milligrams(mg)/deciliter(dL). Data is presented for those participants who experienced Grade II to IV aGVHD and those participants who did not experience Grade II to IV aGVHD at pre-transplant and post-transplant. (NCT00513474)
Timeframe: Pre-transplant Day -7 to Day -1 and Post-transplant Day 0 to Day 6

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Day -7Day -6Day -5Day -4Day -3Day -2Day -1Day 0Day 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6
Control Group4.1573.4192.9672.5792.3581.8671.712.1632.6712.7782.8052.7582.5792.653
Rasburicase Group0.10.0750.0860.10.0670.0810.4380.9381.6242.0762.2712.5482.5952.705

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grades II to IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (aGVHD)

"aGVHD severity was determined using International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) scale stage and grade of the skin, liver and gut. Stage 1: Skin=maculopapular rash <25% of body surface; Liver=Bilirubin 2-3 mg/dL and Gut=500-999 mL diarrhea/day or peristent nausea with histologic evidence of GvHD. Stage 2: Skin=maculopapular rash 25-50% of body surface; Liver=Bilirubin 3.1-6 mg/dL and Gut=1000-1499 mL diarrhea/day. Stage 3: Skin=maculopapular rash >50% of body surface; Liver=Bilirubin 6.1-15 mg/dL and Gut=≥1500 mL diarrhea/day. Stage 4: Skin=generalized erythroderma with bulla formation; Liver=Bilirubin >15 mg/dL and Gut=severe abdominal pain.~Grade 1: Stage 1-2 rash; no liver or gut involvement. Grade II: Stage 3 rash, or stage 1 liver involvement, or stage 1 gut involvement. Grade III: None to stage 3 skin rash with stage 2-3 liver, or stage 2-4 gut involvement. Grade IV: Stage 4 skin rash, or stage 4 liver involvement." (NCT00513474)
Timeframe: Up to 71 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rasburicase Group24
Control Group57

[back to top]

Number of Participant With Adverse Events (AE)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. (NCT00513474)
Timeframe: Up to 71 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rasburicase Group21
Control Group21

[back to top]

Overall Pancreas Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.

Comparisons of pancreas function (C-peptide in ng/mL) at 12, 36, and 60 months post-transplant. (NCT00533442)
Timeframe: at 1-5 years post-transplant

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Mean Log {C-peptide at 12 months}Mean Log {C-peptide at 36 months}Mean Log {C-peptide at 60 months}
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus Steroids1.150.9901.17
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus Steroids1.080.9861.22

[back to top]

Event-Specific Survival Comparisons

Freedom from biopsy-proven acute rejection of the kidney allograft; Freedom from biopsy-proven acute rejection of the pancreas allograft; Death-censored kidney graft survival; Death-censored pancreas graft survival; Death-uncensored graft (kidney and pancreas) survival; and Patient survival. (NCT00533442)
Timeframe: over 1-10 years post-transplant

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection of the KidneyBiopsy-Proven Acute Rejection of the PancreasDeath-Censored Kidney Graft FailureDeath-Censored Pancreas Graft FailureDeath-Uncensored Graft (Kidney&Pancreas) SurvivalPatient Death
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus Steroids2291872616
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus Steroids811022515

[back to top]

Overall Kidney Transplant Function at 12, 36, and 60 Months Post-transplant.

Comparisons of renal function (eGFR, measured in mL/min/1.73 m^2) at 12, 36, and 60 months post-transplant. (NCT00533442)
Timeframe: at 1-5 years post-transplant

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Mean eGFR at 12 monthsMean eGFR at 36 monthsMean eGFR at 60 months
Tacrolimus Plus MMF Plus Steroids67.261.561.9
Tacrolimus Plus Rapamycin Plus Steroids71.263.056.5

[back to top]

Graft Survival at Month 6 and Month 12

"Graft survival was defined as any participant who was known to have a functioning graft (i.e., not graft loss) at 6 months and 12 months after the skin closure date. Graft loss was defined as patient death, retransplant, permanent return to dialysis (dialysis greater than 30 days) or transplant nephrectomy.~The Kaplan-Meier estimates at Days 182 and 365 were used for the analyses at 6 months and 12 months respectively. Lost to follow-up or participants with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit." (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 6 months and 12 months

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6Month 12
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF92.385.8
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus96.086.5
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF93.590.9
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab96.287.3

[back to top]

Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale Scores Over Time

The impact of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms on health-related quality of life was assessed using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale Scores (GSRS). The GSRS a 15-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses the impact of gastrointestinal symptoms during the past week on a scale from 1 (no discomfort at all) to 7 (very severe discomfort). Possible overall scores range from 1 to 7, with lower scores indicating a better quality of life with respect to gastrointestinal symptoms. (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: Months 1, 3, 6, and 12

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Month 1 (N=70, 61, 61, 64)Month 3 (N=58, 55, 53, 56)Month 6 (N=63, 67, 62, 63)Month 12 (N=63, 65, 53, 65)
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF1.481.341.421.57
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus1.591.471.491.52
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF1.431.421.411.42
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab1.721.521.631.63

[back to top]

Maximum Grade of T-cell Mediated Rejection as Assessed by Central Review

"The grade of acute T-cell mediated rejection was classified as IA, IB, IIA, IIB and III according to Banff 2005 criteria. If a patient had more than 1 T-cell mediated rejection, the episode with the most severe grade was used in the analysis.~Grade IA: Cases with significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis; Grade IB: Cases with significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of severe tubulitis; Grade IIA: Cases with mild to moderate intimal arteritis; Grade IIB: Cases with severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area; Grade III: Cases with transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation." (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 6 months and 12 months

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 6 - Grade IAMonth 6 - Grade IBMonth 6 - Grade IIAMonth 6 - Grade IIBMonth 6 - Grade IIIMonth 12 - Grade IAMonth 12 - Grade IBMonth 12 - Grade IIAMonth 12 - Grade IIBMonth 12 - Grade III
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF1154012540
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus2133021330
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF1362114621
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab1050010500

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection (BCAR) at Month 6 Assessed by Local Review

"Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist. Biopsies were graded according to the 2005 Banff criteria. All biopsies (T-cell and/or antibody mediated) of grade 1 or higher were considered a BCAR.~The Kaplan-Meier estimates at Day 182 was used for the analyses at 6 months. Lost to follow-up or patients with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit." (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab12.7
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF26.3
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus18.8
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF16.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure at Month 6 and 12

Treatment failure was defined as death, graft loss, BCAR (local review), lost to follow-up or early discontinuation of treatment regimen. The Kaplan-Meier estimates at Days 182 and 365 were used for the analyses at 6 months and 12 months respectively. Lost to follow-up or participants with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit. (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 6 months and 12 months

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6Month 12
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF29.534.7
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus38.445.2
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF37.745.5
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab26.635.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With T-cell Mediated BCAR at Month 6 and 12 Assessed by Local Review

"Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist. Biopsies were graded according to the 2005 Banff criteria. All biopsies of grade 1 or higher were considered a BCAR.~The Kaplan-Meier estimates at Days 182 and 365 were used for the analyses at 6 months and 12 months respectively. Lost to follow-up or participants with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit." (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 6 months and 12 months

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6Month 12
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF16.718.1
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus18.818.8
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF25.027.7
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab12.714.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With T-cell Mediated BCAR at Month 6 and 12 Assessed by Central Review

"Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the central reviewer. Biopsies were graded according to the 2005 Banff criteria. All biopsies of grade 1 or higher were considered a BCAR.~The Kaplan-Meier estimates at Days 182 and 365 were used for the analyses at 6 months and 12 months respectively. Lost to follow-up or participants with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit." (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 6 months and 12 months

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6Month 12
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF14.215.5
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus12.112.1
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF17.018.4
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab7.77.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Multiple Rejection Episodes at Months 6 and 12

All participants were evaluated for the incidence of multiple rejection episodes (clinically treated and/or BCAR as assessed by the local reviewer) through 6 months and 12 months. (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 6 months and 12 months

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6Month 12
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF2.63.8
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus4.04.0
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF3.97.8
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab1.31.3

[back to top]

Change From Week 4 in Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimated by the MDRD Method at Month 6 and Month 12

The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) method. (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: Week 4, Month 6 and Month 12

,,,
InterventionmL/min per 1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Week 4Change at Month 6 (N=65, 66, 67, 66)Change at Month 12 (n=66, 64, 64, 66)
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF58.02.52.7
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus51.68.39.1
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF59.33.23.3
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab54.75.78.9

[back to top]

Change From Week 4 in GFR by Iothalamate Clearance at Month 6

The glomerular filtration rate was measured directly using iothalamate clearance. (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Month 6

,,,
InterventionmL/min per 1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Week 4Change at Month 6 (N=48, 45, 45, 47)
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF52.096.60
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus44.363.56
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF56.513.47
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab48.005.81

[back to top]

Time to First T-cell Mediated BCAR Assessed by Local Review

The time to first T-cell mediated BCAR (local review) was calculated as the first biopsy date in which the local reviewer confirmed an acute rejection minus the date of skin closure +1. (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab9
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF12
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus18
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF12.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure at 6 and 12 Months Assessed by Local Review

Efficacy failure is defined as death, graft failure (permanent return to dialysis [>30 days] or retransplant), BCAR according to local review, or lost to follow-up. (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 6 months and 12 months

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6Month 12
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF23.129.5
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus22.729.3
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF29.933.8
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab15.225.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With BCAR at Month 12 Assessed by Local Review

"Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by the clinical site pathologist. Biopsies were graded according to the 2005 Banff criteria. All biopsies (T-cell and/or antibody mediated) of grade 1 or higher were considered a BCAR.~The Kaplan-Meier estimates at Day 365 was used for the analyses at 12 months. Lost to follow-up or participants with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit." (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab15.4
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF29.0
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus20.2
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF18.1

[back to top]

Time to First BCAR Assessed by Central Review

The time to first BCAR (central review) was calculated as the first biopsy date in which the central reviewer confirmed an acute rejection minus the date of skin closure +1. Only participants with a BCAR are included in the analysis. (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab19
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF10
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus12
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF11.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure at 6 and 12 Months Assessed by Central Review

Efficacy failure is defined as death, graft failure (permanent return to dialysis [>30 days] or retransplant), BCAR according to central review, or lost to follow-up. (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 6 months and 12 months

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6Month 12
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF20.525.6
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus16.021.3
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF22.126.0
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab11.419.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Clinically Treated Acute Rejection at Month 6 and Month 12

Patients who received immunosuppressive medications for the treatment of suspected or BCAR were considered to have a clinically-treated acute rejection. (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 6 months and 12 months

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6Month 12
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF23.123.1
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus29.330.7
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF33.835.1
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab19.020.3

[back to top]

Time to First T-cell Mediated BCAR Assessed by Central Review

The time to first T-cell mediated BCAR (central review) was calculated as the first biopsy date in which the central reviewer confirmed an acute rejection minus the date of skin closure +1. Only participants with a T-cell mediated BCAR are included in the analysis. (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab19
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF10
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus12
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF11.5

[back to top]

Time to First BCAR Assessed by Local Review

The time to first BCAR (local review) was calculated as the first biopsy date in which the local reviewer confirmed an acute rejection minus the date of skin closure +1. Only participants with a BCAR are included in the analysis. (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab9
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF12
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus19
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF12.5

[back to top]

Change From Week 4 in Serum Creatinine at Month 6 and 12

(NCT00543569)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Month 6 and 12

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Week 4Change at Month 6 (N=69, 69, 68, 70)Change at Month 12 (N=67, 67, 65, 68)
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF1.5-0.00.1
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus1.6-0.3-0.2
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF1.6-0.2-0.2
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab1.5-0.0-0.1

[back to top]

Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index Score Over Time

The impact of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms on health-related quality of life was assessed using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) symptom severity score. The GIQLI is a 36-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses the impact of gastrointestinal symptoms during the past 2 weeks on a scale from 0 (all of the time) to 4 (never). Possible overall scores ranged from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life according to the different symptomatic criteria. (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: Months 1, 3, 6, and 12

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Month 1 (N=63, 60, 59, 58)Month 3 (N=53, 52, 53, 54)Month 6 (N=58, 61, 57, 59)Month 12 (N=62, 60, 52, 58)
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF2.983.163.173.19
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus3.003.113.243.26
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF2.973.293.263.18
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab2.852.963.053.13

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With BCAR at Month 6 and 12 Assessed by Central Review

"Rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy by a central reviewer. Biopsies were graded according to the 2005 Banff criteria. All biopsies (T-cell and/or antibody mediated) of grade 1 or higher were considered a BCAR.~The Kaplan-Meier estimates at Days 182 and 365 were used for the analyses at 6 months and 12 months respectively. Lost to follow-up or participants with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit." (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 6 months and 12 months

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6Month 12
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF14.215.5
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus12.112.1
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF18.319.7
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab7.77.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Anti-lymphocyte-treated Rejection at Months 6 and 12

"Participants with histologically proved Banff Grade II or III rejection could receive anti-rejection therapy with anti-lymphocyte antibodies per institutional protocol.~The use of anti-lymphocyte antibody therapy at any time during a suspected or proven rejection episode for the treatment of acute rejection was considered an event." (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 6 months and 12 months

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6Month 12
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF7.77.7
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus12.012.0
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF20.820.8
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab6.36.3

[back to top]

Patient Survival at Month 6 and Month 12

"Patient survival is any participant who is known to be alive 6 months and 12 months after the skin closure date.~The Kaplan-Meier estimates at Days 182 and 365 were used for the analyses at 6 months and 12 months respectively. Lost to follow-up or participants with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit." (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 6 months and 12 months

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6Month 12
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF93.689.7
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus97.387.8
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF94.892.2
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab96.287.3

[back to top]

Maximum Grade of T-cell Mediated Rejection Assessed by Local Review

"The grade of acute T-cell mediated rejection was classified as IA, IB, IIA, IIB and III according to Banff 2005 criteria. If a patient had more than 1 T-cell mediated rejection, the episode with the most severe grade was used in the analysis.~Grade IA: Cases with significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis; Grade IB: Cases with significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of severe tubulitis; Grade IIA: Cases with mild to moderate intimal arteritis; Grade IIB: Cases with severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area; Grade III: Cases with transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation." (NCT00543569)
Timeframe: 6 months and 12 months

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 6 - Grade IAMonth 6 - Grade IBMonth 6 - Grade IIAMonth 6 - Grade IIBMonth 6 - Grade IIIMonth 12 - Grade IAMonth 12 - Grade IBMonth 12 - Grade IIAMonth 12 - Grade IIBMonth 12 - Grade III
Alefacept QOW/Tacrolimus/MMF2434034340
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus8330083300
Alefacept QW/Tacrolimus/MMF64900651000
Tacrolimus/MMF/Basiliximab4330053300

[back to top]

Neutrophil Engraftment - The Days Till ANC Recovery

The primary engraftment endpoint, neutrophil engraftment, is defined as the first of three consecutive days on which the absolute neutrophil count is > 500/µL. The duration and extent of neutrophil engraftment is the time from transplant to neutrophil engraftment. (NCT00544115)
Timeframe: Up to 180 days post transplant

Interventiondays (Median)
Regimen I17
Regimen II16
Regimen III15
Regimen IV14
Regimen V18
Regimen VI16

[back to top]

Two-year Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) was measured from peripheral stem cell infusion to death from any cause. It was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; the 95% confidence interval was calculated using Greenwood's formula. Participants were followed up to 2 years after transplant and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to generate the two-year Overall Survival estimate presented. (NCT00544115)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years post transplant

Interventionpercentage of survival probability (Number)
Regimen I58
Regimen II50
Regimen III54
Regimen IV50
Regimen V38
Regimen VI50

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss

Graft survival was defined as the time between the randomization date and the graft loss date. Participants were censored at the date of last follow up, the date of last contact or premature withdrawal, and date of death. (NCT00545402)
Timeframe: Days 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12, 28 days after Month 12 or last dose of study treatment, and 6 and 12 months after the last dose of study treatment.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CS2.2
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CS5.6

[back to top]

Graft Survival

The median time, in months, between randomization and graft loss event. Participants were censored at the date of last follow up, the date of last contact or premature withdrawal, and date of death. (NCT00545402)
Timeframe: Days 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12, 28 days after Month 12 or last dose of study treatment, and 6 and 12 months after the last dose of study treatment.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CS12.9
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CS12.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) at Month 12 - Percentage of Participants With an Event

OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and death up to Month 12. Participants were censored at the date of last follow up and the date of last contact or premature withdrawal. (NCT00545402)
Timeframe: Days 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CS8.9
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CS11.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival at Month 12

The median time, in months, between randomization and OS event. Participants were censored at the date of last follow up and the date of last contact or premature withdrawal. (NCT00545402)
Timeframe: Days 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12

Interventionmonths (Median)
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CS12.9
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CS12.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) According to Banff Criteria up to 12 Months Post-Transplant

Banff criteria required at least 2 of the 3 following features for a histopathological diagnosis of acute rejection: portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation, and venous endothelial inflammation. Each item was graded from 0 to 3 where 0 equals (=) mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. The sum of the 3 individual scores, from 0 to 9, corresponded to the Rejection Activity Index (RAI). If RAI = 0, 1, or 2, there was no evidence of rejection. If RAI = 3, there was borderline acute rejection. If RAI = 4 or 5, there was mild acute rejection. If RAI = 6 or 7, there was moderate acute rejection. If RAI = 8 or 9, there was severe acute rejection. (NCT00545402)
Timeframe: Days 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12, 28 days after Month 12 or last dose of study treatment, and 6 and 12 months after the last dose of study treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CS8.0
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CS8.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants by Graft Histology at 12 Months Post-Transplant - Central Review

The percentage of participants with biopsies of grafts evaluated by central review and scored according to Banff criteria at Month 12 post-transplant. (NCT00545402)
Timeframe: Days 0, 5, and 14, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Normal liverMinor lesionsAcute rejectionChronic rejectionChronic hepatitisVascular lesionsPathology of biliary obstructionLobular hepatitisRecurrence of initial autoimmune diseaseOther
Adjusted MMF + Tacrolimus + CS4.84.80.07.126.235.74.84.80.035.7
Fixed-Dose MMF + Tacrolimus + CS11.417.10.02.922.911.45.72.90.045.7

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of NK Cell Reconstitution

Cumulative incidence of successful reconstitution to donor level is calculated. (NCT00553202)
Timeframe: At 5 years from HSCT date

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Chemotherapy and Allogeneic SCT)48.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS - Time from HSCT until death (NCT00553202)
Timeframe: At 5 years from HSCT date

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Chemotherapy and Allogeneic SCT)45.9

[back to top]

Disease Relapse

Count of participants with disease relapse at 1 year (NCT00555048)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alemtuzumab0

[back to top]

Grades III-IV Acute Graft-vs-host Disease (GVHD)

(NCT00555048)
Timeframe: Up to 100 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alemtuzumab0

[back to top]

Extensive Chronic GVHD

Count of participants with extensive chronic GVHD at 1 year (NCT00555048)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alemtuzumab1

[back to top]

Life-threatening Infection

(NCT00555048)
Timeframe: Up to 180 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alemtuzumab0

[back to top]

Graft Failure

Count of participants with graft failure at day 100 (NCT00555048)
Timeframe: Up to day 100

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alemtuzumab0

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival

Count of surviving participants at 1 year (NCT00555048)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alemtuzumab1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated GFR, by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation: 12-month Treatment Phase

GFR is a measure of the rate at which blood is filtered by the kidney. MDRD is an equation (calculation) used to estimate GFR in participants with impaired renal function based on serum creatinine (ScR), age, race, gender, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and albumin (Alb). GFR (mL/min/1.73 m^2) = 170*(Scr)^-0.999*(Age)^-0.176*(0.762 if female)*(1.180 if African American)*(BUN)^-0.170*(Alb)^+0.318. ). BL= baseline, mL= milliliters; min= minute; m^2= meters squared. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Baseline [BL] (pretransplant time point), 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
BL; (n=47, 42, 42, 45, 45)1 month; (n=45, 44, 42, 49, 49)Change from BL to 1 month; (n=43, 38, 37, 41, 45)2 months; (n=29, 30, 23, 25, 27)Change from BL to 2 months; (n=28, 26, 20, 22, 25)3 months; (n=36, 36, 35, 46, 37)Change from BL to 3 months; (n=33, 34, 30, 40, 33)6 months; (n=39, 34, 38, 49, 36)Change from BL to 6 months; (n=37, 30, 33, 42, 31)12 months; (n=40, 33, 35, 46, 38)Change from BL to 12 month; (n=37, 29, 30, 41, 33)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF66.385.621.086.125.386.522.082.218.683.818.2
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF77.493.115.396.618.391.713.390.37.697.719.2
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF76.689.611.4105.831.596.618.386.05.685.64.2
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF73.764.9-8.776.3-1.565.0-8.461.9-11.768.4-6.3
Group 5: Tacrolimus80.262.2-17.766.9-14.060.4-20.259.8-22.763.8-17.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated GFR During the LTE

GFR is a measure of the rate at which blood is filtered by the kidney. MDRD is an equation (calculation) used to estimate GFR in participants with impaired renal function based on serum creatinine (ScR), age, race, gender, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and albumin (Alb). GFR (mL/min/1.73 m^2) = 170*(Scr)^-0.999*(Age)^-0.176*(0.762 if female)*(1.180 if African American)*(BUN)^-0.170*(Alb)^+0.318. ). BL= baseline, mL= milliliters; min= minute; m^2= meters squared. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Baseline (pretransplant time point), 1, 2, 3, 6,12, 18, 24, 30, 36 months posttransplant

,,,,
InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Baseline (BL); (n=27,24,20,33,23)1 month; (n=28,27,23,36,25)Change from BL to 1 month; (n=26,24,20,31,23)2 months; (n=21,21,15,19,19)Change from BL to 2 months; (n=20,19,14,17,18)3 months; (n=27, 26, 24, 35, 24)Change from BL to 3 months; (n=24, 24, 20, 30, 21)6 months; (n=29, 26, 24, 24, 38, 23)Change from BL to 6 months; (n=27, 23, 20, 33, 20)12 months; (n=29, 25, 24, 36, 24)Change from BL to 12 months; (n=26, 23, 20, 31,21)18 months; (n=24, 25, 21, 33, 21)Change from BL to 18 months; (n=21, 23, 17, 28,18)24 months; (n=13, 15, 15, 22, 15)Change from BL to 24 months; (n=10, 13, 11, 19,13)At 30 months; (n=6, 6, 6, 12, 7)Change from BL to 30 months; (n=5, 5, 3, 8, 6)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF64.488.226.386.226.087.023.387.624.088.122.684.822.584.827.9102.941.4
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF85.6103.120.299.412.697.013.793.18.6101.319.495.011.287.69.994.440.4
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF78.095.116.0102.330.797.017.092.312.294.816.591.37.496.315.290.417.1
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF77.968.6-7.671.2-11.666.5-8.164.6-10.967.8-9.369.0-6.873.3-2.264.1-15.0
Group 5: Tacrolimus83.059.1-22.664.4-17.457.0-23.556.7-23.361.7-20.263.2-6.166.32.359.5-10.7

[back to top]

Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) Values: 12-month Treatment Phase

The HbA1c test is important in diabetes as a long-term measure of control over blood glucose, where the glucose bound to hemoglobin during the past 3-4 months is measured. A baseline diabetes participant was one who had a medical history of diabetes or being under anti-diabetic medication at the time of the transplantation. BL = baseline, DM = Diabetes mellitus. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: 6, 12 months (mth) posttransplant

,,,,
InterventionPercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Mean)
6 mo: All participants (n=39, 34, 38, 47, 35)6 mo: DM at BL (n=15, 12, 10, 12, 10)6 mo: DM at BL/DM at 6m (n=23, 14, 14, 19, 18)12 mo: All participants (n=40, 35, 35, 44, 37)12 mo: DM at BL (n=15, 11, 7, 11, 12)12 mo: DM at BL/DM at 12 mth (n=23,13 ,11,18,20)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF5.86.56.16.06.96.3
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF5.86.66.45.86.76.6
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF5.66.15.95.76.76.2
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF5.45.85.55.56.26.0
Group 5: Tacrolimus5.45.45.45.86.56.3

[back to top]

Belatacept Trough Concentration Before Each Infusion During the LTE

Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) is the minimum observed serum drug concentration. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Samples were collected predose on Days 5, 14, 28, 56, 84, 112, 168, 252, 336, 364; after end of infusion on Days 1, 5, 84, 112, 196, 336; and on Days 9, 85, 91, 98, 105, 532, 728.

,,
Interventionµg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 5: (n=40, 43, 41)Day 14: (n=41, 43, 38)Day 28: (n=42, 38, 37)Day 56: (n=12, 13, 12)Day 84: (n=34, 31, 34 )Day 112: (n=29, 26, 29)Day 168: (n=30, 29, 29)Day 252: (n=28, 28, 27)Day 336: (n=26, 23, 21)Day 364: (n=28, 28, 22 )Day 532: (n=22, 24, 14)Day 728: (n=10, 12, 14)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF79.1532.3923.5118.9127.1110.127.303.653.222.522.714.75
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF79.4031.1622.2318.8427.329.648.013.743.384.014.684.20
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF70.8829.2121.726.576.606.753.573.594.373.624.914.22

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Episode of Acute Rejection, Graft Loss, or Death by End of Study (Includes LTE Data)

Any AR that was clinically suspected and biopsy proven (by central pathologist) was included in this triple composite end point. All biopsies for suspected AR were assessed by a central histopathologist using Banff criteria. For 95% CI within each group, normal approximation was used if N>=5, otherwise exact method was used. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) through database lock (20-June-2011)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF36.7
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF37.0
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF25.0
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF21.1
Group 5: Tacrolimus23.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Episode of Acute Rejection (AR), Graft Loss, or Death by 6 Months Post-transplant

Any AR that was clinically suspected and biopsy proven (by central pathologist) was included in this triple composite end point. All biopsies for suspected AR were assessed by a blinded central histopathologist using Banff grading schema. Graft loss was defined as impairment of liver function to such a degree that the participant died or underwent re-transplantation. For 95% (confidence interval) CI within each group, normal approximation is used if N>=5, otherwise exact method is used. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: At 6 months posttransplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF48.0
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF41.7
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF46.9
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF15.1
Group 5: Tacrolimus38.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Surviving With Functional Graft by End of Study (Includes LTE Data)

For 95% CI within each group, normal approximation was used if N>=5, otherwise exact method was used. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) through database lock (20-June-2011)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF93.3
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF85.2
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF95.8
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF92.1
Group 5: Tacrolimus96.2

[back to top]

Belatacept PK Parameter: Volume of Distribution

Volume of distribution (Vss) is the volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration. . Vss was estimated from AUC (TAU) between Weeks 12 and 16, assuming steady state. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Samples were collected at Pre dose on Days 5, 14, 28, 56, 84, 112, 168, 252, 336, 364; after end of infusion on Days 1, 5, 84, 112, 196, 336; and on Days 9, 85, 91, 98, 105.

InterventionL/kg (Mean)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF0.09
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF0.08
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF0.11

[back to top]

Belatacept PK Parameter: Total Body Clearance

Total body clearance is the rate and extent at which the drug is eliminated from the body. The clearance of a drug is used to understand the processes involved in drug elimination, distribution and metabolism. CLT was estimated from AUC (TAU) between Weeks 12 and 16, assuming steady state. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Samples were collected at Pre dose on Days 5, 14, 28, 56, 84, 112, 168, 252, 336, 364; after end of infusion on Days 1, 5, 84, 112, 196, 336; and on Days 9, 85, 91, 98, 105.

InterventionmL/h/kg (Geometric Mean)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF0.45
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF0.41
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF0.45

[back to top]

Belatacept PK Parameter: Terminal Half-life

Terminal Half-life (T 1/2) is the time a drug takes for the concentration levels to fall to 50% of their value. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Samples were collected at Pre dose on Days 5, 14, 28, 56, 84, 112, 168, 252, 336, 364; after end of infusion on Days 1, 5, 84, 112, 196, 336; and on Days 9, 85, 91, 98, 105.

Interventionhour (Mean)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF240.80
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF227.74
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF207.88

[back to top]

Belatacept PK Parameter: Minimum Plasma Concentration

Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) is the minimum observed serum drug concentration. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Samples were collected at Pre dose on Days 5, 14, 28, 56, 84, 112, 168, 252, 336, 364; after end of infusion on Days 1, 5, 84, 112, 196, 336; and on Days 9, 85, 91, 98, 105.

Interventionµg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF23.63
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF27.20
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF5.91

[back to top]

Belatacept PK Parameter: Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve to the End of the Dosing Period (AUCtau)

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for each dosing interval is determined using the linear trapezoidal rule. The AUC(TAU) of belatacept from the MI regimens and LI regimens were calculated over 2 and 4 weeks respectively. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Samples were collected at Pre dose on Days 5, 14, 28, 56, 84, 112, 168, 252, 336, 364; after end of infusion on Days 1, 5, 84, 112, 196, 336; and on Days 9, 85, 91, 98, 105.

Interventionµg*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF19865
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF21526
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF19730

[back to top]

Belatacept PK Parameter: Amount Excreted in Ascites Fluid Over Days 1 to 14

Amount Excreted in Ascites (Ae,asc) was estimated from the ascites drug concentrations and volumes within a dosing interval. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Days 1 to 14

Interventionµg (Mean)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF46654
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF31425
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF81451

[back to top]

Belatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Time to Achieve the Maximum Plasma Concentration

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) is the time taken to reach the maximum observed plasma concentration. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Samples were collected at Pre dose on Days 5, 14, 28, 56, 84, 112, 168, 252, 336, 364; after end of infusion on Days 1, 5, 84, 112, 196, 336; and on Days 9, 85, 91, 98, 105.

Interventionhour (Median)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF1.00
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF1.08
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF1.00

[back to top]

Belatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Maximum Serum Concentration

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) is the maximum observed serum drug concentration. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Samples were collected at Pre dose on Days 5, 14, 28, 56, 84, 112, 168, 252, 336, 364; after end of infusion on Days 1, 5, 84, 112, 196, 336; and on Days 9, 85, 91, 98, 105.

Interventionµg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF221.3
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF227.6
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF205.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Episode of Acute Rejection, Graft Loss, or Death by 12 Months

Any AR that was clinically suspected and biopsy proven (by central pathologist) was included in this triple composite end point. All biopsies for suspected AR were assessed by a blinded central histopathologist using Banff grading. Graft loss was defined as impairment of liver function to such a degree that the participant died or underwent re-transplantation. For 95% CI within each group, normal approximation is used if N>=5. Otherwise exact method is used. For 95% CI of difference, adjustment is made for randomization strata if N >= 5 in each treatment arm. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: At 12 months posttransplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF52.0
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF47.9
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF53.1
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF18.9
Group 5: Tacrolimus40.0

[back to top]

Summary Statistics for Systolic Blood Pressure: 12-month Treatment Phase

(NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Baseline (pretransplant), 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
BL (n=50, 48, 49, 53, 49)1 month (n=50, 48, 49, 52, 48)Change from BL to 1 month (n=50, 48, 49, 52, 47)3 months (n=44, 46, 41, 48, 42)Change from BL to 3 months (n=44, 46, 41, 48, 41)6 months (n=43, 40, 36, 47, 37)Change from BL to 6 months (n=43, 40, 36, 47, 36)9 months (n=34, 30, 29, 41, 31)Change from BL to 9 months (n=34, 30, 29, 41, 31)12 months (n=42, 37, 36, 46, 38)Change from BL to 12 months (n=42, 37, 36, 46, 37)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF115.3123.38.0127.010.9124.08.4125.510.4125.89.2
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF115.4126.310.9126.911.7126.59.3125.88.8127.010.2
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF111.4120.99.4124.412.7124.612.8123.913.3121.210.6
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF121.2129.28.5136.916.3130.610.0135.614.4137.015.9
Group 5: Tacrolimus125.3124.60.6133.09.1132.08.3133.911.6138.014.6

[back to top]

Summary Statistics for Mean Arterial Pressure: 12-month Treatment Phase

(NCT00555321)
Timeframe: BL (pretransplant), 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
BL (n=50, 48, 49, 53, 49)1 month (n=50, 48, 49, 52, 48)Change from BL to 1 month (n=50, 48, 49, 52, 47)3 months (n=44, 46, 41, 48, 41)Change from BL to 3 months (n=44, 46, 41, 48, 41)6 months (n=43, 40, 36, 47, 37)Change from BL to 6 months (n=43, 40, 36, 47, 36)9 months (n=34, 30, 29, 41, 31)Change from BL to 9 months (n=34, 30, 29, 41, 31)12 months (n=42, 37, 36, 46, 38)Change from BL to 12 months (n=42, 37, 36, 46, 37)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF81.490.79.393.911.391.08.792.110.193.010.1
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF80.591.911.494.514.095.114.494.313.194.614.3
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF79.188.79.692.212.292.412.693.013.290.110.6
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF85.495.010.0100.115.195.410.598.212.399.214.3
Group 5: Tacrolimus87.591.34.196.59.695.08.597.711.399.012.1

[back to top]

Summary Statistics for Lipid Parameters; Serum HDL Cholesterol: 12-month Treatment Phase

(NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Baseline (pretransplant), 1, 6, 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BL (n=46, 42, 44, 49, 46)1 month (n=46, 47, 42, 49, 49)Change from BL to 1month (n=43, 41, 39, 45, 45)6 months (n=39, 34, 38, 48, 36)Change from BL to 6 months (n=36, 30, 35, 44, 32)12 months (n=40, 33, 35, 45, 37)Change from BL to12 months (n=36, 29, 32, 42, 33)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF32.141.39.941.59.243.612.7
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF36.236.91.742.87.341.58.3
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF36.542.57.244.29.444.27.3
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF33.341.27.145.510.845.610.9
Group 5: Tacrolimus31.134.13.442.69.543.310.0

[back to top]

Summary Statistics for Lipid Parameters-Serum Total Non-High Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol: 12-month Treatment Phase

(NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Baseline (pretransplant), 1, 6, 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BL (n=45, 42, 44, 49, 46)1 months (n=46, 47, 42, 49, 49)Change from BL to 1 months (n=42, 41, 39, 45, 45)6 months (n=39, 34, 38, 48, 36)Change from BL to 6 months (n=35, 30, 35, 44, 32)12 months (n=40, 33, 35, 45, 37)Change from BL to 12 months (n=35, 29, 32, 42, 33)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF80.4125.147.2139.359.5143.266.7
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF83.5147.966.0134.444.0137.449.2
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF84.8148.054.1138.948.2142.253.4
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF77.7121.747.0125.148.1118.247.4
Group 5: Tacrolimus76.8130.047.5135.448.6131.944.1

[back to top]

Summary Statistics for Lipid Parameters- Serum Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL): 12-month Treatment Phase

(NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Baseline (pretransplant), 1, 6, 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BL (n=29, 30, 25, 34, 32)1 month (n=30, 34, 29, 41, 42)Change from BL to 1 month (n=17, 21, 17, 27, 30)6 months (n=27, 29, 27, 41, 30)Change from BL to 6 months (n=16, 19, 18, 28, 22)12 months (n=38, 29, 32, 42, 35)Change from BL to 12 months (n=22, 19, 20, 25, 22)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF52.395.242.799.241.293.037.8
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF58.693.234.3107.545.9107.245.4
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF58.9115.757.198.248.7103.237.2
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF63.689.826.196.728.989.023.7
Group 5: Tacrolimus59.998.441.592.826.193.813.7

[back to top]

Summary Statistics for Lipid Parameters- Serum Cholesterol: 12-month Treatment Phase

(NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Baseline (pretransplant), 1, 6, 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BL (n=45, 42, 44, 49, 47)1 month (n=46, 47, 42, 49, 49)Change from BL to 1 month (n=42, 41, 39, 45, 46)6 months (n=39, 34, 38, 48, 36)Change from BL to 6 months (n=35, 30, 35, 44, 33)12 months (n=40, 33, 35, 45, 37)Change from BL to 12 months (n=35, 29,32, 42, 34)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF112.9166.357.0180.868.6186.879.4
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF119.7184.967.7177.351.3178.957.5
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF121.3190.661.3182.256.6186.460.7
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF111.0162.954.0170.658.9163.858.2
Group 5: Tacrolimus106.4164.153.4177.960.8175.257.3

[back to top]

Summary Statistics for Lipid Parameters - Serum Triglyceride: 12-month Treatment Phase

(NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Baseline (pretransplant), 1, 6, 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BL (n=29, 30, 25, 34, 32)1 month (n=29, 33, 29, 41, 43)Change from BL to 1 month (n=16, 20, 17, 27, 30)6 months (n=26, 29, 25, 41, 30)Change from BL to 6 months (n=15, 19, 18, 28, 22)12 months (n=38, 29, 32, 42, 34)Change from BL to 12 months (n=22, 19, 20, 25, 21)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF94.4153.971.2234.3199.9255.1237.2
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF110.1162.945.7157.118.3159.020.3
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF80.2149.085.8162.788.7158.291.6
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF84.4149.168.2148.160.8156.472.3
Group 5: Tacrolimus89.2163.571.8167.284.3190.592.6

[back to top]

Summary Statistics for Diastolic Blood Pressure: 12-month Treatment Phase

Participants were considered to have hypertension if they had Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP) ≥ 80 mmHg. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: BL (pretransplant), 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
BL (n=50, 48, 49, 53, 49)1 month (n=50, 48, 49, 52, 48)Change from BL to 1 month (n=50, 48, 49, 52, 47)3 months (n=44, 46, 41, 48, 42)Change from BL to 3 months (n=44, 46, 41, 48, 41)6 months (n=43, 40, 36, 47, 37)Change from BL to 6 months (n=43, 40, 36, 47, 36)9 months (n=34, 30, 29, 41, 31)Change from BL to 9 months (n=34, 30, 29, 41, 31)12 months (n=42, 37, 36, 46, 38)Change from BL to 12 months (n=42, 37, 36, 46, 37)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF64.574.410.077.411.574.48.875.410.076.510.26
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF63.174.711.778.315.279.417.078.515.278.516.3
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF62.972.69.776.112.076.312.577.613.274.510.6
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF67.577.810.781.714.477.810.779.511.280.310.21
Group 5: Tacrolimus68.674.65.878.29.976.68.679.511.279.510.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus (NODM): 12-month Treatment Phase

A participant who did not have diabetes prior to randomization was determined to have NODM if(i) the participant received an antidiabetic medication for a duration of at least 30 days or(ii) at least two fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests indicate that FPG is>=126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L). For 95% CI within each group, normal approximation is used if N>=5. For 95% CI of difference, adjustment is made for randomization strata (HCV-Infection status at baseline) if N >= 5 in each treatment arm. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: 6 and 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6 months12 months
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF35.535.5
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF15.615.6
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF13.913.9
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF21.123.7
Group 5: Tacrolimus35.137.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Have Hypertension at Any Given Time During the 12-month Treatment Phase

Percentage of participants at any given time who meet the definition of hypertension. Participants were considered to have hypertension when either of the following criteria were met: (1) SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg or DBP ≥ 80 mm Hg or (2) participant received an antihypertensive medication(s) for the indication of hypertension or due to medical history of hypertension. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: 6 and 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
By 6 monthsBy 12 months
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF64.072.0
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF77.168.8
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF69.459.2
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF71.779.2
Group 5: Tacrolimus70.070.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Developed Hypertension in 12-month Treatment Phase

Percentage of participants who develop hypertension after randomization and transplantation. Transient post-operative increases in BP were not to be counted as new onset hypertension. Hypertension was to be assessed only at or after the Week 4 visit. Participants were considered to have hypertension when either of the following criteria were met: (1) SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg or DBP ≥ 80 mm Hg or (2) participant received an antihypertensive medication(s) for the indication of hypertension or due to medical history of hypertension. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: 6 and 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
By 6 monthsBy 12 months
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF94.1100
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF93.393.3
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF93.893.8
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF100.0100.0
Group 5: Tacrolimus100100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Develop Dyslipidemia, Hypertriglyceridemia and Hypercholesterolemia After Randomization and Transplantation: 12-month Treatment Phase

Percentage of participants who develop dyslipidemia, defined as hypertriglyceridemia (triglycerides [TGs] ≥ 500 mg/dL [5.65 mmol/L]), hypercholesterolemia (Low density lipoprotein [LDL] ≥ 100 mg/dL [2.59 mmol/L]), or elevated non-high density lipoprotein (non- high density lipoprotein [HDL] ≥ 130 mg/dL [3.36 mmol/L]) in the presence of high TGs (TGs ≥ 200 mg/dL [2.26 mmol/L]). (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: 6 and 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
By 6 month: DyslipidemiaBy 6 month: HypertriglyceridemiaBy 6 month: HypercholesterolemiaBy 12 month: DyslipidemiaBy 12 month: HypertriglyceridemiaBy 12 month: Hypercholesterolemia
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF50.02.442.959.54.854.8
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF54.3048.657.1054.3
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF45.7039.158.72.252.2
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF33.3028.650.02.442.9
Group 5: Tacrolimus59.5051.470.3062.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Surviving With Functional Graft: 12-month Treatment Phase

For 95% CI within each group, normal approximation was used if N>=5. Otherwise exact method was used. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: At 6 and 12 months

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
At 6 monthsAt 12 months
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF90.090.0
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF89.683.3
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF77.667.3
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF92.592.5
Group 5: Tacrolimus90.088.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Meeting the Definition of Dyslipidemia, Hypertriglyceridemia or Hypercholesterolemia at Any Given Time: 12-month Treatment Phase

Percentage of participants at any given time (at Month 6 and Month 12) who met the definition of dyslipidemia.Dyslipidemia is defined as hypertriglyceridemia (TGs ≥ 500 mg/dL [5.65 mmol/L]), hypercholesterolemia (LDL ≥ 100 mg/dL [2.59 mmol/L]), or elevated non-HDL (non-HDL ≥ 130 mg/dL [3.36 mmol/L]) in the presence of high TGs (TGs ≥ 200 mg/dL [2.26 mmol/L]). (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: 6 and 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6 months: Dyslipidemia6 months: Hypertriglyceridemia6 months: Hypercholesterolemia12 months: Dyslipidemia12 months: Hypertriglyceridemia12 months: Hypercholesterolemia
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF36.06.030.040.04.030.0
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF31.3029.233.3029.2
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF30.6024.544.92.040.8
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF32.1030.234.01.930.2
Group 5: Tacrolimus26.0022.042.02.036.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants (Who Were Hepatitis C Virus [HCV] Positive at Baseline) With HCV Recurrence (Assessed by Central Pathologist) During the LTE

HCV Recurrence is defined as Histological confirmation on liver biopsy by the Ishak (modified Knodell) system and required both a score >= 5 out of 18 on modified Histological Activity Index grading and a fibrosis Score >= 2 out of 6 on modified staging. All biopsies, including Week 52 biopsies, were considered. Only the first HCV recurrence episode for each participant was counted. For 95% CI within each group, normal approximation was used if N>=5, otherwise exact method was used. For 95% CI of difference, normal approximation was used if N>=5 in both arms, otherwise exact method was used. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: 12 months posttransplant, end of study (database lock, 20-June-2011)

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
At 12 monthsAt end of study
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF50.066.7
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF41.750.0
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF022.2
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF58.864.7
Group 5: Tacrolimus72.772.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants (Who Were Hepatitis C Virus [HCV] Positive at Baseline) With HCV Recurrence (Assessed by Central Pathologist) by 12 Months

HCV Recurrence is defined as Histological confirmation on liver biopsy by the Ishak (modified Knodell) system and required both a score >= 5 out of 18 on modified Histological Activity Index grading and a fibrosis Score >= 2 out of 6 on modified staging. All biopsies, including Week 52 biopsies, were considered. Only the first HCV recurrence episode for each participant was counted. For 95% CI within each group, normal approximation was used if N>=5, otherwise exact method was used. For 95% CI of difference, normal approximation was used if N>=5 in both arms, otherwise exact method was used. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: 6 and 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6 months12 months
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF39.160.9
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF21.730.4
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF23.828.6
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF20.052.0
Group 5: Tacrolimus33.337.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Abnormalities: 12-month Treatment Phase

ULN= upper limit of normal; Normal ranges are provided by the central laboratory and may vary according to sex and age. High alkaline phosphatase (ALP): >5.0*ULN U/L; High alanine aminotransferase (ALT): >5.0*ULN U/L; High aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >5.0*ULN U/L; High direct bilirubin: >3.0 * ULN mg/dL; High g-glutamyl transferase (GGT): >5.0*ULN U/L; High total bilirubin: >3.0*ULN mg/dL; High creatinine: > 3.0*ULN mg/dL (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Baseline (pretransplant), 4, 12, 24, 52 weeks

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
High ALP: (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)High ALT: (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)High AST: (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)High Direct Bilirubin: (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)High GGT: (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)High Total Bilirubin: (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)High Creatinine: (n=47, 44, 44, 53, 50)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF5169152590
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF618141824130
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF619161924160
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF41682027120
Group 5: Tacrolimus6921622100

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Abnormalities During the LTE

ULN= upper limit of normal; Normal ranges are provided by the Central Laboratory and may vary according to sex and age. High alanine aminotransferase (ALT): >5.0*ULN U/L; High aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >5.0*ULN U/L; High direct bilirubin: >3.0*ULN mg/dL; High g-glutamyl transferase (GGT): >5.0*ULN U/L; High total bilirubin: >3.0*ULN mg/dL; High creatinine: > 3.0*ULN mg/dL (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Every 4 weeks from Week 53 to Week 104.

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
High ALTHigh ASTHigh Direct BilirubinHigh GGTHigh Total BilirubinHigh Creatinine
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF001210
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF234630
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF121610
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF4431321
Group 5: Tacrolimus332800

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Abnormalities: 12-month Treatment Phase

Low hemoglobin: <8 g/dL; Low platelet count: <50*10^9 C/L; Low leukocytes: <2.0 *10^3 c/µL; Low lymphocytes (absolute): <0.5*10^3 c/µL; Low neutrophils (absolute): <1.0*10^3 Cc/µL. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Baseline (pretransplant), 2, 4, 8, 12 weeks, and every 4 weeks for week 16 to 52

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Low Hemoglobin: (n=48, 46, 44, 52, 50)Low Platelets: (n=48, 46, 43, 52, 50)Low Leukocytes : (n=48, 46, 44, 52, 50)Low Absolute Lymphocyte: (n=48, 46, 44, 52, 50)Low Absolute Neutrophils : (n=48, 46, 44, 52, 50)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF206296
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF616184
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF245264
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF024178
Group 5: Tacrolimus623161

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Abnormalities During the LTE

Low platelet count: <50*10^9 c/µl; Low leukocytes: <2.0*10^3 c/µl; Low lymphocytes (absolute): <0.5*10^3 c/µl; Low neutrophils (absolute): <1.0*10^3 c/µl. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Every 4 weeks from Week 53 to Week 104.

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Low Platelets: (n=29, 26, 22, 37, 25)Low Leukocytes : (n=29, 27, 22, 37, 25)Low Absolute Lymphocyte: (n=29, 27, 22, 36, 25)Low Absolute Neutrophils: (n=29, 27, 22, 36, 25)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF1180
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF2232
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF0031
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF2352
Group 5: Tacrolimus0030

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Marked Electrolytes, Protein and Metabolic Test Abnormalities: 12-month Treatment Phase

Low total calcium: <7 mg/dL; High total calcium: >12.5 mg/dL ; Low bicarbonate: <11 mEq/L; Low serum potassium: <3.0 mEq/L; High serum potassium:>6.0 mEq/L; High serum magnesium: >2.46 mEq/L; Low serum magnesium:<0.8 mEq/L; Low serum sodium: <130 mEq/L; High serum sodium: >155 mEq/L; Low inorganic phosphorus: <2.0 mg/dL; Low albumin: <2 g/dL; High uric acid: >10 mg/dL (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Baseline (pretransplant), Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Low Total Calcium (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)High Total Calcium (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)Low Bicarbonate (n=47, 47, 44, 53, 50)Low Serum Potassium (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)High Serum Potassium (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)High Serum Magnesium (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)Low Serum Magnesium (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)Low Serum Sodium (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)High Serum Sodium (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)Low Inorganic Phosphorus (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)Low Albumin (n=47, 47, 45, 53, 50)High Uric Acid (n=48, 47, 44, 53, 50)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF000010230022
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF100200020211
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF100110220102
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF101120020205
Group 5: Tacrolimus000010120005

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Marked Electrolytes, Protein and Metabolic Test Abnormalities During the LTE

Low Serum Potassium: <3.0 meq/L; High serum potassium:>6.0 mEq/L; Low serum magnesium:<0.8 mEq/L; Low serum sodium: <130 mEq/L; High serum sodium: >155 mEq/L; Low inorganic phosphorus: <2.0 mg/dL; High uric acid: >10 mg/dL (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Every 4 weeks from Week 53 to Week 104.

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Low Serum PotassiumHigh Serum PotassiumLow Serum SodiumHigh Serum SodiumLow Inorganic PhosphorusHigh Uric Acid
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF011010
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF012001
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF001110
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF001016
Group 5: Tacrolimus000006

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Central Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection by Treatment Type During the LTE

Acute rejections were clinically suspected and biopsy proven by central pathologist. Corticosteroid-resistant rejection = Continued rejection, as documented by liver biopsy, after the completion of 2 days of corticosteroids and requiring use of T-cell depleting agent. Refractory rejection=Continued rejection, as documented by liver biopsy, after use of corticosteroids and T cell depletion therapy. Increase in the dose of TAC was monitored in participants who were assigned to one of the TAC-based regimens. DBL=database lock, TRT=treatment (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) through database lock (20-June-2011)

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
By 12 months: Acute rejectionsBy 12 months: Treated participantsBy 12 months: Corticosteroid treatment OnlyBy 12 months: Corticosteroid resistantBy 12 months: RefractoryBy 12 months: Initial lymphocyte depleting TRTBy 12 months: Other / not availableBy 12 months: Increase in dose of TACBy DBL: Acute rejectionsBy DBL: Treated participantsBy DBL: Corticosteroid treatment OnlyBy DBL: Corticosteroid resistantBy DBL: RefractoryBy DBL: Initial lymphocyte depleting treatmentBy DBL: Other/ Not availableBy DBL: Increase in dose of TAC
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF9440000094400000
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF6540010065400100
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF6440000064400000
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF6540000165400001
Group 5: Tacrolimus6650000066500001

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Central Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection by Treatment Type by 12 Months

Acute rejections were clinically suspected and biopsy proven by central pathologist. Corticosteroid-resistant rejection = Continued rejection, as documented by liver biopsy, after the completion of 2 days of corticosteroids and requiring use of T-cell depleting agent. Refractory rejection=Continued rejection, as documented by liver biopsy, after use of corticosteroids and T cell depletion therapy. Increase in the dose of TAC was monitored in participants who were assigned to one of the TAC-based regimens. TRT= treatment (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: 3, 6 and 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
By 3 months: Acute rejectionsBy 3 months: Treated participantsBy 3 months: Corticosteroid treatment OnlyBy 3 months: Corticosteroid resistantBy 3 months: RefractoryBy3 months: Initial lymphocyte depleting TRTBy 3 months: Increase in dose of TacrolimusBy 3 months: Other / not availableBy 6 months: Acute rejectionsBy 6 months: Treated participantsBy 6 months: Corticosteroid treatment OnlyBy 6 months: Corticosteroid resistantBy 6 months: RefractoryBy 6 months: Initial lymphocyte depleting TRTBy 6 months: Increase in dose of TacrolimusBy 6 months: Other / not availableBy 12 months: Acute rejectionsBy 12 months: Treated participantsBy 12 months: Corticosteroid treatment OnlyBy 12 months: Corticosteroid resistantBy 12 months: RefractoryB12 months: Initial lymphocyte depleting TRT12 months: Other / not available
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF7101000000201212000002212120000
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF15117112001511611300161271130
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF14770000015880000016880000
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF43200010543000107540000
Group 5: Tacrolimus131090001015121000011152100001

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Acute Rejections by Rejection Activity Index (RAI) by 12 Months

Acute Rejections were clinically suspected and biopsy proven by central pathologist. The Banff Rejection Activity Index (RAI) comprises 3 components scored from 0 to 3: venous endothelial inflammation; bile duct inflammation damage; and portal inflammation; the scores are combined to an overall score (the RAI). An overall score of 0-2 is considered indeterminate, score of 3-4 is mild, score of 5-6 is moderate, and score of 7-9 is severe. Only the episode with the highest total RAI score for each participant was counted. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: 3, 6 and 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
By 3 months; Indeterminate scoreBy 3 months; Mild ScoreBy 3 months; Moderate ScoreBy 3 months; Severe ScoreBy 6 months; Indeterminate scoreBy 6 months; Mild ScoreBy 6 months; Moderate ScoreBy 6 months; Severe ScoreBy 12 months; Indeterminate scoreBy 12 months; Mild ScoreBy 12 months; Moderate ScoreBy 12 months; Severe Score
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF014300173001741
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF086106810781
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF077007800790
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF031004100610
Group 5: Tacrolimus072408340834

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Received Anti-hypertensive Therapy at Month 12

(NCT00555321)
Timeframe: 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Received at least 1 medicationReceived 1 medicationReceived 2 medicationsReceived 3 medicationsReceived 4 medications
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF2013611
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF1916210
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF148240
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF2617531
Group 5: Tacrolimus2112531

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Had AEs, Death, SAEs or Were Discontinued Due to AEs: 12-month Treatment Phase

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a participant administered an investigational product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization (including elective surgery), results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 12 m + 8 week follow-up or ≤ 56 days after discontinuation of study medication

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
DeathSAEsRelated SAEsDiscontinued due to SAEsAEsRelated AEsDiscontinued due to AEs
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF42812750457
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF42911648347
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF9371411483312
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF14016453427
Group 5: Tacrolimus4351913504218

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Had AEs of Special Interest During the LTE

AE of special interest included malignancies (including skin carcinomas), infections (viral, cytomegalovirus, herpes, fungal, and bacterial). (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) through database lock (20-June-2011)

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
MalignanciesInfections and Infestations
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF18
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF46
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF39
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF811
Group 5: Tacrolimus38

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Had Adverse Events of Special Interest During 12-month Treatment Phase

AE of of special interest included malignancies (including skin carcinomas), infections (viral, cytomegalovirus, herpes, fungal, and bacterial), serious infections (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 12 months or ≤ 56 days after discontinuation of study medication

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
MalignanciesPost-transplant lymphoproliferative disorderAll InfectionsBacterial infectionsFungal infectionsViral infectionsCytomegalovirus infectionsPolyoma virus infectionsHerpes infectionsHepatitis C virus recurrenceSerious infectionsAutoimmune eventsAcute peri-infusional eventsThrombotic and embolic events
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF103256105031411053
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF003911911413712013
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF21301114141004613107
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF203166940313120NA10
Group 5: Tacrolimus202913571029122NA5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AEs), Death, Serious AEs (SAEs) or Were Discontinued Due to AEs (Includes Long Term Extension [LTE] Data)

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a subject administered an investigational product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization (including elective surgery), results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to Week 104 + within 56 Days after the last infusion/dose, Deaths were monitored up to database lock (20-June-2011)

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SAEsRelated SAEsDiscontinued due to SAEsAEsRelated AEsDiscontinued due to AEsDeaths (due to AE)Deaths (not due to AE)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF18523027220
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF22942721531
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF17912320110
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF291213833130
Group 5: Tacrolimus21902623000

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Had Acute Rejection by Banff Grade by 12 Months

Acute Rejections (AR) were clinically suspected and biopsy proven by central pathologist. The Banff grading is a classification of renal allograft pathology and AR. Grade I: AR requiring moderate (>25%) to severe mononuclear cell interstitial infiltrate and moderate tubulitis; Grade II: AR requiring severe tubulitis and/or intimal arteritis; Grade III: AR requiring transmural arteritis. Only the episode with highest Banff grade for each participant was counted. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: 3, 6 and 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
By 3 months: Grade 1By 3 months: Grade 2By 3 months: Grade 3By 6 months: Grade 1By 6 months: Grade 2By 6 months: Grade 3By 12 months: Grade 1By 12 months: Grade 2By 12 months: Grade 3
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF143016401570
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF861681781
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF761771781
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF310410610
Group 5: Tacrolimus652762762

[back to top]

Number of Participants Having Acute Rejections: 12-month Treatment Phase

Acute rejections were clinically suspected and biopsy proven by central pathologist. The number of episodes of AR was counted. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: 3 , 6, and 12 months

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
By 3 months ; OverallBy 3 months ; 1 episodeBy 3 months ; 2 episodesBy 3 months ; >2 episodesBy 6 months ; OverallBy 6 months ; 1 episodeBy 6 months ; 2 episodesBy 6 months ; >2 episodesBy 12 months ; OverallBy 12 months ; 1 episodeBy 12 months ; 2 episodesBy 12 months ; >2 episodes
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF171511201811221831
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF151410151230161330
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF141400151410161420
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF440054107610
Group 5: Tacrolimus131210151320151320

[back to top]

Number of Participants Having Acute Rejections During the LTE

Acute rejections were clinically suspected and biopsy proven by central pathologist. The number of episodes of AR was counted. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) through database lock (20-June-2011)

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
By 12 months (m); OverallBy 12 m ; 1 episodeBy 12 m ; 2 episodesBy 12 m; >2 episodesBy Database lock; OverallBy Database lock ; 1 episodeBy Database lock ; 2 episodesBy Database lock ; >2 episodes
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF98109810
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF66006600
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF65106510
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF65106510
Group 5: Tacrolimus65106501

[back to top]

Number of Participants Having Acute Rejection by Rejection Activity Index During the LTE

Acute Rejections were clinically suspected and biopsy proven by central pathologist. The Banff Rejection Activity Index (RAI) comprises 3 components scored from 0 to 3: venous endothelial inflammation; bile duct inflammation damage; and portal inflammation; the scores are combined to an overall score (the RAI). An overall score of 0-2 is considered indeterminate, score of 3-4 is mild, score of 5-6 is moderate, and score of 7-9 is severe. Only the episode with the highest total RAI score for each participant was counted. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) through End of study (database lock of 20-June-2011)

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
By 12 months; Indeterminate scoreBy 12 months; Mild ScoreBy 12 months; Moderate ScoreBy 12 months; Severe ScoreAt end of study; Indeterminate scoreAt end of study; Mild ScoreAt end of study; Moderate ScoreAt end of study; Severe Score
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF08100810
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF05100510
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF02400240
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF05100510
Group 5: Tacrolimus04020402

[back to top]

Number of Participants at Risk of First Acute Rejection as Determined by Kaplan-Meier Method by 12 Months

The time from transplantation to the first AR episode in each treatment arm was summarized using Kaplan-Meier curves. Acute Rejections were clinically suspected and biopsy proven by central pathologist. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
By 3 monthsBy 6 monthsBy 9 monthsBy 12 months
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF30272523
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF31292925
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF30282723
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF48474742
Group 5: Tacrolimus34323228

[back to top]

Number of Participants (Who Were HCV Positive at Baseline) With HCV RNA Levels >2.4 * 10^6 U/mL and >4.7 * 10^6 U/mL During the LTE

Recurrent hepatitis C infection of the allograft following liver transplantation can be detected by monitoring HCV RNA levels. In HCV positive participants, quantitative HCV RNA levels > 2.4 x 10^6 U/mL and > 4.7 x 10^6 U/mL were descriptively summarized by treatment group. BL = baseline (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: BL (pretransplant), 12, 18, 24, 30 months (mo) posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BL; HCV RNA > 2.4*10^6 U/mL (n=10,11,6,15,10)12 mo; HCV RNA > 2.4*10^6 U/mL (n=11,10,8,16,10)12 mo; HCV RNA > 4.7*10^6 U/mL (n=11,10,8,16,10)18 mo; HCV RNA > 2.4*10^6 U/mL (n=7,10,3,12,9)18 mo; HCV RNA > 4.7*10^6 U/mL (n=7,10,3,12,9)24 mo; HCV RNA > 2.4*10^6 U/mL (n=4,3,4,8,4)24 mo; HCV RNA > 4.7*10^6 U/mL (n=4,3,4,8,4)30 mo; HCV RNA > 2.4*10^6 U/mL (n=1,1,1,2,2)30 mo; HCV RNA > 4.7*10^6 U/mL (n=1,1,1,2,2)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF066322211
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF154221000
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF043221000
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF2108766511
Group 5: Tacrolimus144321111

[back to top]

Number of Participants (Who Were HCV Positive at Baseline) With HCV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Levels >2.4*10^6 U/mL and >4.7*10^6 U/mL: 12-month Treatment Phase

Recurrent hepatitis C infection of the allograft following liver transplantation can be detected by monitoring HCV RNA levels. In HCV positive participants, quantitative HCV RNA levels > 2.4 * 10^6 U/mL and > 4.7 * 10^6 U/mL were descriptively summarized by treatment group. BL=baseline (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Baseline (pretransplant), 6 and 12 months (mo) posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BL; HCV RNA > 2.4*10^6 U/mL (n=21,22,19,22,23)BL; HCV RNA > 4.7 *10^6 U/mL (n=21,22,19,22,23)6 mo; HCV RNA > 2.4*10^6 U/mL (n=16,15,15,21,14)6 mo; HCV RNA > 4.7*10^6 U/mL (n=16,15,15,21,14)12 mo; HCV RNA > 2.4*10^6 U/mL (n=15,13,14,20,13)12 mo; HCV RNA > 4.7*10^6 U/mL (n=15,13,14,20,13)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF209776
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF417776
Group 3: Belatacept Less Intensive (LI) + MMF218775
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF3014111311
Group 5: Tacrolimus10111077

[back to top]

Mean Change in Baseline Values of Cystatin C at 2 and 12 Months

Cystatin C is a protein encoded by the CST3 gene, which is mainly used as a biomarker of kidney function. If kidney function and glomerular filtration rate decline, the blood levels of cystatin C rise. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Baseline (pretransplant), 2, and 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Baseline (BL); (n=44, 47, 48, 49, 43)2 months; (n=40, 39, 39, 48, 43)Change from BL to 2 months; (n=35, 38, 38, 44,37)12 months; (n=40, 36, 36, 49, 40)Change from BL to 12 months; (n=35, 35, 35,45,34)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF1.21.1-0.21.1-0.2
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF1.21.1-0.10.9-0.2
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF1.11.0-0.11.20.1
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF1.41.40.11.3-0.1
Group 5: Tacrolimus1.21.50.31.30.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline Serum Creatinine at Months 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12

Measurement of SCr is commonly used as an indicator of renal function. High creatinine blood level is an indicator of deficient filtering by the kidney. SCr was determined at baseline and various post-baseline time points. (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Baseline (pretransplant time point), 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline (BL); (n=47, 42, 42, 45, 45)At 1 months; (n=45, 44, 42, 49, 49)Change from BL to 1 months; (n=43, 38, 37, 41, 45)At 2 months; (n=29, 30, 23, 25, 27)Change from BL to 2 months; (n=28, 26, 20, 22, 25)At 3 months; (n=36, 36, 35, 46, 37)Change from BL to 3 months; (n=33, 34, 30, 40, 33)At 6 months; (n=39, 34, 38, 49, 36)Change from BL to 6 months; (n=37, 30, 33, 42, 31)At 12 months; (n=40, 33, 35, 46, 38)Change from BL to 12 months; (n=37, 29, 30, 41,33)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF1.40.9-0.50.9-0.70.9-0.61.0-0.51.0-0.5
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF1.00.8-0.10.8-0.20.9-0.10.90.00.8-0.2
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF0.90.9-0.10.8-0.20.8-0.10.90.11.00.1
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF1.11.20.11.00.01.20.11.30.21.20.1
Group 5: Tacrolimus1.01.30.31.20.21.30.31.30.41.20.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR): 12-month Treatment Phase

"GFR was assessed using a true measure of glomerular filtration via iothalamate clearance test. The month 2 time point was selected as the baseline time point with respect to measured GFR due to logistical difficulty in obtaining measured GFR at the time of liver transplant and post-transplant renal function largely stabilizing by 2 months. All Measured GFR > 200 were truncated at 200." (NCT00555321)
Timeframe: Baseline (2 month), 12 months posttransplant

,,,,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
2 months (n=37, 36, 35, 41, 37)12 months (n=39, 35, 29, 40, 32)Change from 2 to 12 months (n=31, 29, 26, 36, 29)
Group 1: Basiliximab+Belatacept (MI) + MMF72.488.914.2
Group 2: Belatacept (MI) + MMF86.693.15.8
Group 3: Belatacept (LI) + MMF98.673.1-19.6
Group 4: Tacrolimus + MMF65.975.25.3
Group 5: Tacrolimus58.570.57.3

[back to top]

New-onset Polyomavirus (BK Virus) Disease Per Kidney Biopsy

(NCT00556933)
Timeframe: Two years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Single Dose rATG (6 mg/kg) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus1
Divided-dose rATG (1.5mg/kg x 4) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus2
Single-dose rATG (6mg/kg) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil0
Divided-dose rATG(1.5mg/kgx4); Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil2

[back to top]

Patient Survival

(NCT00556933)
Timeframe: Two years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Single Dose rATG (6 mg/kg) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus0
Divided-dose rATG (1.5mg/kg x 4) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus1
Single-dose rATG (6mg/kg) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil0
Divided-dose rATG(1.5mg/kgx4); Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil1

[back to top]

Ratio of CD4/CD8 Lymphoid Cells

(NCT00556933)
Timeframe: One year

InterventionRatio of cell counts (Mean)
Single Dose rATG (6 mg/kg) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus0.84
Divided-dose rATG (1.5mg/kg x 4) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus0.84
Single-dose rATG (6mg/kg) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil0.98
Divided-dose rATG(1.5mg/kgx4); Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil1.01

[back to top]

Requirement for Additional Immunosuppression (Such as Corticosteroids, Antimetabolites or Other Immunosuppressive Agents)

(NCT00556933)
Timeframe: Two years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Single Dose rATG (6 mg/kg x 1) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus7
Divided-dose rATG (1.5mg/kg x 4) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus5
Single-dose rATG (6mg/kg ) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil6
Divided-dose rATG(6mg/kg ) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil11

[back to top]

Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (Cumulative Calcineurin-inhibitor Nephrotoxicity/Transplant Nephropathy) Per Protocol Surveillance Kidney Biopsies (Banff Grading Criteria).

Protocol kidney biopsies collected at approximately 12 and 24 months were scored by a transplant renal pathologist blinded to treatment group assignment for evidence of rejection, BK virus nephropathy, antibody-mediated rejection, recurrent disease, inflammation, and Banff 2005 categories of chronic renal injury. Chronic injury categories were arteriolar hyaline thickening (ah), allograft glomerulopathy (cg), interstitial fibrosis (ci), tubular atrophy (ct), and vascular fibrous intimal thickening (cv). Severity scores within each category could be 0 (<5%; none or minimal), 1 (>5% - <25%; mild), 2 (>25% - <50%, moderate), or 3 (>50%, severe). The proportions of patients in each severity grade (0, 1, 2, and 3) for both the individual categories and a composite were compared using Fisher's exact test. (NCT00556933)
Timeframe: Two years

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Banff histopathology cumulative grade = 0Banff histopathology cumulative grade = 1Banff histopathology cumulative grade = 2Banff histopathology cumulative grade = 3
Divided-dose rATG (1.5mg/kg x 4) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus404696
Divided-dose rATG(6mg/kg ) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil514171
Single Dose rATG (6 mg/kg x 1) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus4337164
Single-dose rATG (6mg/kg ) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil534520

[back to top]

Safety Profile

Number of events: cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease, opportunistic infections (bacteremia, abscess, pneumonia, fungal), Post-transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD), wound healing problems within 30 days, and lymphoceles. (NCT00556933)
Timeframe: Two years

InterventionEvents (Number)
Single Dose rATG (6 mg/kg x 1) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus11
Divided-dose rATG (1.5mg/kg x 4) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus14
Ingle-dose rATG (6mg/kg ) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil10
Divided-dose rATG(6mg/kg ) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil17

[back to top]

Lymphoid Cell Sub-type CD3 Absolute Numbers

(NCT00556933)
Timeframe: One year

InterventionCD3 Cell Numbers/mm^3 (Mean)
Single Dose rATG (6 mg/kg) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus446
Divided-dose rATG (1.5mg/kg x 4) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus375
Single-dose rATG (6mg/kg) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil392
Divided-dose rATG(1.5mg/kgx4); Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil266

[back to top]

Average of Renal Function

Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by using the abbreviated MDRD (aMDRD) formula and patient serum creatinine and demographic data; averaged values from months four through 24. (NCT00556933)
Timeframe: Two years

,,,
Interventionml/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Average GFR, months 1-3Average GFR, months 4-6Average GFR, months 7-9Average GFR, months 10-12Average GFR, months 13-15Average GFR, months 16-18Average GFR, months 19-21Average GFR, months 22-24
Divided-dose rATG (1.5mg/kg x 4) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus50.157.355.055.657.356.354.857.0
Divided-dose rATG(6mg/kg ) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil50.454.855.856.658.556.656.857.6
Single Dose rATG (6 mg/kg x 1) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus50.457.354.855.856.857.656.656.9
Single-dose rATG (6mg/kg ) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil53.660.261.057.461.862.360.262.9

[back to top]

New-onset Diabetes and Hyperglycemia After Transplantation (NODAT)

(NCT00556933)
Timeframe: Six months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Single Dose rATG (6 mg/kg) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus10
Divided-dose rATG (1.5mg/kg x 4) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus7
Single-dose rATG (6mg/kg) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil5
Divided-dose rATG(1.5mg/kgx4); Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil12

[back to top]

Graft Survival

Graft failure = permanent return of patient to dialysis. (NCT00556933)
Timeframe: Two years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Single Dose rATG (6 mg/kg) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus0
Divided-dose rATG (1.5mg/kg x 4) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus1
Single-dose rATG (6mg/kg) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil2
Divided-dose rATG(1.5mg/kgx4); Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil0

[back to top]

Acute Tubular Necrosis (ATN) Rate, Defined as the Requirement for Dialysis Within 7 Days Post-transplantation.

(NCT00556933)
Timeframe: Seven days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Single Dose rATG (6 mg/kg x 1) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus3
Divided-dose rATG (1.5mg/kg x 4) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus1
Single-dose rATG (6mg/kg ) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil6
Divided-dose rATG(1.5mg/kgx4); Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil2

[back to top]

Acute Rejection Per Kidney Biopsy (Banff Grading Criteria)

(NCT00556933)
Timeframe: Two years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Single Dose rATG (6 mg/kg x 1) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus7
Divided-dose rATG (1.5mg/kg x 4) and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus4
Single-dose rATG (6mg/kg ) and Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil8
Divided-dose rATG(1.5mg/kgx4), Sirolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil9

[back to top]

Relapse/Progression Rate at Two Years

The primary endpoint was 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse/progression (RP), defined as time from alloHCT to disease recurrence or progression. Cumulative incidences for RP was generated in a competing-risk setting, given that death events were competing events. (NCT00577278)
Timeframe: From the initial treatment to the last disease assessment, up to two years

Interventionpercentage of cumulative incidence (Number)
0.4 mCi 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan20

[back to top]

Overall Survival at Two Years

Overall survival (OS) was measured from initial treatment to death from any cause. It was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; the 95% confidence interval was calculated using Greenwood's formula. (NCT00577278)
Timeframe: From the initial treatment to the last disease assessment, up to two years

Interventionpercentage of survival probability (Number)
0.4 mCi 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan63

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival at Two Years

Progression-free survival (PFS) was measured from initial treatment to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever came first. It was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; the 95% confidence interval was calculated using Greenwood's formula. (NCT00577278)
Timeframe: From the initial treatment to the last disease assessment, up to two years

Interventionpercentage of survival probability (Number)
0.4 mCi 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan61

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Alive at 1 Year Post Transplant

(NCT00578903)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients20

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Chronic GVHD at 2 Years Post Transplant

(NCT00578903)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Acute GVHD at 100 Days Post Transplant

(NCT00578903)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients4

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Alive at 2 Years Post Transplant

(NCT00578903)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients20

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Alive at 100 Days Post Transplant

(NCT00578903)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients21

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Engraftment Rate at 100 Days Post Transplant

Absolute neutrophil count greater than 0.5 X 10^9/ml for at least 3 days (NCT00578903)
Timeframe: 100 days post transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients19

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Successful Donor Engraftment

Each patient will be classified as a success or failure. A success will be defined as engraftment of at least 35% of cells 100 days after transplant. (NCT00579111)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
HLA-identical Sibling Transplant2
Unrelated Matched or Single Antigen Mismatched Transplant1

[back to top] [back to top]

Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Total CD8 T Cells

The development of total CD8 T cells at one year as measured using flow cytometry (NCT00579527)
Timeframe: 1 year post-CTTI

Interventioncells/mm3 (Median)
Cultured Thymus Tissue Implantation With Immunosuppression145

[back to top]

Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Total CD4 T Cells

The development of total CD4 T cells at one year as measured using flow cytometry (NCT00579527)
Timeframe: 1 year post-CTTI

Interventioncells/mm3 (Median)
Cultured Thymus Tissue Implantation With Immunosuppression593

[back to top]

Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Total CD3 T Cells

The development of total CD3 T cells at one year as measured using flow cytometry (NCT00579527)
Timeframe: 1 year post-CTTI

Interventioncells/mm3 (Median)
Cultured Thymus Tissue Implantation With Immunosuppression726

[back to top]

Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Response to Mitogens

Measurement of the T cell proliferative response to the mitogen phytohemagglutin (PHA). (NCT00579527)
Timeframe: 1 year post-CTTI

Interventioncounts per minute (cpm) (Median)
Cultured Thymus Tissue Implantation With Immunosuppression139189

[back to top]

Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Naive CD8 T Cells

The development of total naive CD8 T cells at one year as measured using flow cytometry (NCT00579527)
Timeframe: 1 year post-CTTI

Interventioncells/mm3 (Median)
Cultured Thymus Tissue Implantation With Immunosuppression37

[back to top]

Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Naive CD4 T Cells

The development of total naive CD4 T cells at one year as measured using flow cytometry (NCT00579527)
Timeframe: 1 year post-CTTI

Interventioncells/mm3 (Median)
Cultured Thymus Tissue Implantation With Immunosuppression156

[back to top]

Survival at 1 Year Post-CTTI

Survival at 1 year post cultured thymus tissue implantation was assessed using the Kaplan Meier Estimated Survival. This mathematical function estimates the survival for a certain length of time. (NCT00579527)
Timeframe: 1 year post-CTTI

Intervention% of participants who survive to 1 year (Number)
Cultured Thymus Tissue With Immunosuppression71

[back to top]

Survival at 2 Years Post-CTTI

Survival at 2 years post cultured thymus tissue implantation was assessed using the Kaplan Meier Estimated Survival. This mathematical function estimates the survival for a certain length of time. (NCT00579527)
Timeframe: 2 years post-CTTI

Intervention% of participants who survive to 2 years (Number)
Cultured Thymus Tissue Implantation With Immunosuppression71

[back to top]

Two-Year Disease-free Survival of Study Participants Who Completed the Study Regimen

"Survival and complete resolution of all signs of leukemia 2 years after transplant with all of the following:~1, Normal bone marrow with blasts <5% with normal cellularity, normal megakaryopoiesis, more than 15% erythropoiesis, and more than 25% granulocytopoiesis.~2. Normalization of blood counts (no basts, platelets >100,000/mm3, granulocytes >1,500/mm3) 3. No extramedullary disease." (NCT00589316)
Timeframe: 2 years post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Level 1: 12 Gy Iodine-131 + BC8 Monoclonal Antibody0
Dose Level 2: 14 Gy Iodine-131 + BC8 Monoclonal Antibody1
Dose Level 3: 16 Gy Iodine-131 + BC8 Monoclonal Antibody1
Dose Level 4: 18 Gy Iodine-131 + BC8 Monoclonal Antibody1
Dose Level 5: 20 Gy Iodine-131 + BC8 Monoclonal Antibody1
Dose Level 6: 22 Gy Iodine-131 + BC8 Monoclonal Antibody0
Dose Level 7: 24 Gy Iodine-131 + BC8 Monoclonal Antibody0
Dose Level 8: 26 Gy Iodine-131 + BC8 Monoclonal Antibody1

[back to top]

Severity of Chronic GVHD

All Patients were considered for the evaluation of chronic GVHD severity. (NCT00589563)
Timeframe: Patients were evaluated until they developed chronic GVHD, a median of 130 days post HSCT

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No Chronic GVHDYes- LimitedYes - ExtensiveNo- Inevaluable (graft failure/died
All Patients44177

[back to top]

Severity of Acute GVHD

All patients were considered for the evaluation of the severity of acute GVHD. (NCT00589563)
Timeframe: 100 Days Post HSCT

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No Acute GVHDYes - Grade IYes- Grade IIYes- Grade IIIYes - Grade IVNo- Inevaluable (graft failures)
All Patients999104

[back to top]

Time to Platelet Count Recovery (Engraftment)

Platelet recovery is defined as the first date of three consecutive laboratory values ≥ 25 x 10^9 L obtained on different days. (NCT00589563)
Timeframe: Patients were evaluated until platelet recovery, a median of 14 days

InterventionDays (Median)
All Patients14

[back to top]

Time to Absolute Neutrophil Count Recovery (Engraftment)

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery is defined as an ANC of ≥ 0.5 x 10^9/L (500/mm3) for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days (NCT00589563)
Timeframe: Patients were evaluated until neutrophil recovery, a median of 15 days post HSCT

InterventionDays (Median)
All Patients14.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival at Two Years Post HSCT

Patients were evaluated for survival (OS) throughout the study. Kaplan Meier estiamtes were calculated for overall survival using time from HSCT to death of any cause or for surviving patients last contact date. (NCT00589563)
Timeframe: 2 year point estimate was provided.

InterventionPercentage of patients who died (Number)
All Patients65.6

[back to top]

Occurrence of Thrombotic Microangiopathy

Participants were monitored throughout the trial (median of 28 months) for various infections/complications. This is the number of participants who developed TMA. (NCT00589563)
Timeframe: Median Follow Up: 28 Months (Range: 1-49 months)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
All Patients7

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) at Day 100

Patients were evaluated for the development of acute GVHD within the first 100 days post HSCT. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was determined using competing risk analysis. Competing risks for acute GVHD were death and nonengraftment. (NCT00589563)
Timeframe: 100 Days Post Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)

InterventionPercentage of patients developing aGVHD (Number)
All Patients37.3

[back to top]

Event Free Survival at Two Years Post HSCT

Patients were evaluated for event free survival (EFS) throughout the study. Events were defined as death, relapse, progression, or nonengraftment. Kaplan Meier estimates were calculated as time from HSCT to event. (NCT00589563)
Timeframe: 2 year point estimate was provided.

InterventionPercentage of patients with an event (Number)
All Patients61.3

[back to top]

Incidence of Disease Relapse/Progression at 2 Years Post HSCT

Patients were evaluated for relapse/progression post transplant throughout the study. The cumulative incidence of relapse/progression was determined using competing risk analysis. Competing risks for relapse were non-relapse mortality and nonengraftment. (NCT00589563)
Timeframe: 2 year point estimate was provided.

InterventionPercentage of patients who relapsed (Number)
All Patients12.5

[back to top]

Non-relapse Mortality at 100 Days Post HSCT

Patients were evaluated for non-relapse mortality (NRM) throughout the study. Non-relapse mortality was considered any death not attributable to relapse or disease progression. The cumulative incidence of NRM was determined using competing risk analysis. Competing risks for NRM were death due to disease progression, relapse and nonengraftment. (NCT00589563)
Timeframe: 100 day point estimate was provided

InterventionPercentage of patients with a NRM (Number)
All Patients9.4

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD

Patients were evaluated for the development of chronic GVHD from 101 days post HSCT to last contact or documented evidence of the disease. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was determined using competing risk analysis. Competing risks for GVHD were death and nonengraftment. (NCT00589563)
Timeframe: 2 year point estimate was provided.

InterventionPercentage of patients developing cGVHD (Number)
All Patients62.5

[back to top]

Non-relapse Mortality at Two Years Post HSCT

Patients were evaluated for non-relapse mortality (NRM) throughout the study. Non-relapse mortality was considered any death not attributable to relapse or disease progression. The cumulative incidence of NRM was determined using competing risk analysis. Competing risks for NRM were death due to disease progression, relapse and nonengraftment. (NCT00589563)
Timeframe: 2 year point estimate was provided.

InterventionPercentage of patients with a NRM (Number)
All Patients15.6

[back to top]

Occurence of Infections Including Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation

Participants were monitored throughout the trial (median of 28 months) for various infections/complications. (NCT00589563)
Timeframe: Median Follow Up: 28 months (Range: 1-49 months)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Neither CMV or EBVCMV reactivation onlyEBV onlyBoth CMV and EBV
All Patients16934

[back to top]

Occurence of Sinusoidal Obstructive Syndrome (SOS)

Participants were monitored throughout the trial (median of 28 months) for various infections/complications. This is the number of participants who developed SOS. (NCT00589563)
Timeframe: Median Follow Up: 28 Months (Range: 1-49 Months)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
All Patients1

[back to top]

Safety Evaluation

A combination of deaths, graft failure and biopsy proven acute rejections (BPAR) was used to evaluate the safety. (NCT00608244)
Timeframe: 52 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
DeathGraft FailureBPAR
LCP-Tacro000

[back to top]

Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Trough Levels (C24).

Patients had a baseline trough level (C24) measured at day 7 before conversion to LCP-Tacro. (NCT00608244)
Timeframe: 7 Days

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Prograf6.72

[back to top]

Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Exposure Trough Levels (C24).

Patients were converted from Prograf to LCP-Tacro on day 7. On day 21, a trough level (C24) was measured. (NCT00608244)
Timeframe: 21 Days

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
LCP-Tacro6.85

[back to top]

Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC 0-24).

"Patients had a baseline AUC measured (0 to 24 hours) at day 7 before conversion to LCP-Tacro.~The following time points were used to obtain the PK curve for Prograf on day 7: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 15, 16, 20 and 24 hours after the morning dose." (NCT00608244)
Timeframe: 7 Days

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
Prograf205.14

[back to top]

Evaluation of Steady State Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC 0-24) on Day 21.

"Patients were converted from Prograf to LCP-Tacro on day 7. On day 21, AUC was measured (0 to 24 hours).~The following time points were used to obtain the PK curve for LCP-Tacro on day 21: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 hours post-dose." (NCT00608244)
Timeframe: 21 Days

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
LCP-Tacro215.66

[back to top]

Biochemical Remission by Month 3.

Percent of patients who achieve biochemical remission by Month 3 during treatment with LCP-Tacro + prednisone or azathioprine + prednisone. Biochemical remission is defined as ALT, total bilirubin and gamma globulin within normal limits. (NCT00608894)
Timeframe: 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
LCP-Tacro2
Azathioprine4

[back to top]

Biochemical Remission of (AIH) at Month 6.

Percent of patients that achieve biochemical remission of (AIH) at Month 6 during treatment with LCP-Tacro + prednisone or azathioprine + prednisone. Biochemical remission is defined as ALT, total bilirubin and gamma globulin within normal limits. (NCT00608894)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
LCP-Tacro3
Azathioprine4

[back to top]

Incomplete Response, Treatment Failure, or a Case of Relapse at 6 Months

Percents of patients in each treatment group classified as having an incomplete response (defined as some or no improvement during therapy), a treatment failure (defined as permanent discontinuation of the regimen originally randomized to), or a case of relapse (recurrence following achievement of remission) (NCT00608894)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Incomplete responseTreatment failureRelapse
Azathioprine110
LCP-Tacro400

[back to top]

Transplantation-related Mortality at 100 Days Post-transplantation

(NCT00611351)
Timeframe: at the 100 days post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Unrelated Donor Allogeneic2

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT00611351)
Timeframe: 2 years post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Unrelated Donor Allogeneic2

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

(NCT00611351)
Timeframe: 2 years post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Unrelated Donor Allogeneic2

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute Graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD)

(NCT00611351)
Timeframe: at day 100 post transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Unrelated Donor Allogeneic4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

"Causally related was defined as adverse events (AEs) assessed by the Investigator as possibly or probably related to study drug or records where the relationship was missing.~A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:~Resulted in death.~Was life-threatening.~Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity.~Resulted in congenital anomaly or birth defect.~Required patient hospitalization or led to prolongation of hospitalization~Was considered a medically important event.~All rejections and any BK virus, Epstein Barr virus and/or cytomegalovirus infection had to be reported as an SAE" (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 6 Months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventAE causally related to alefacept/placeboAE causally related to MMFAE causally related to tacrolimusAE causally related to steroidsSerious adverse eventsSAE causally related to alefacept/placeboSAE causally related to MMFSAE causally related to tacrolimusSAE causally related to steroidsAE leading to discontinuation of alefacept/placeboAE leading to discontinuation of MMFAE leading to discontinuation of tacrolimusAE leading to discontinuation of steroidsDeaths
Alefacept101415649465716212015106321
Placebo10236564946621919141178813

[back to top]

GFR Measured by Iothalamate Clearance at Month 6

GFR measured using the iothalamate clearance method and determined by a central laboratory. (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: Month 6

InterventionmL/minute (Mean)
Placebo59.6029
Alefacept55.1613

[back to top]

Graft Survival

"Graft survival was defined as any participant who was known to have a functioning graft (i.e., not graft loss) at 6 months. Graft loss is defined as re-transplantation, nephrectomy, death or as dialysis ongoing at end of study or at discontinuation of the participant unless superseded by follow-up information.~The Kaplan-Meier estimate of graft survival within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up were censored at the time of last assessment." (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo90.6
Alefacept95.2

[back to top]

Patient Survival

Patient survival is any participant known to be alive at Month 6. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of patient survival within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up were censored at the time of last assessment. (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo97.1
Alefacept99.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Acute Rejection Diagnosed by Signs and Symptoms at Month 6

Acute rejection diagnosed by signs and symptoms, including biopsy-confirmed or suspected (not confirmed by biopsy - i.e. no biopsy was performed or biopsy did not confirm an acute T-cell mediated rejection). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of acute rejection diagnosed by signs and symptoms within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit. (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo27.4
Alefacept22.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Anti-Lymphocyte Antibody Therapy for Treatment of Rejection at Month 6

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of anti-lymphocyte antibody therapy for acute rejection (clinically-treated or biopsy-confirmed) within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow-up visit. (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo4.7
Alefacept6.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Acute Rejection (T-Cell Mediated or Antibody Mediated) at Month 6

"Biopsies were graded by the clinical site pathologist.according to the Banff 97/05 updated histological classification. A biopsy confirmed acute rejection was an event of suspected acute rejection confirmed by a graft biopsy result of Banff grade ≥ 1.~The Kaplan-Meier estimate of biopsy-confirmed acute T-cell mediated or antibody-mediated rejection within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit." (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo9.3
Alefacept12.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Antibody-Mediated Acute Rejection at Month 6

"Biopsies were graded by the clinical site pathologist.according to the Banff 97/05 updated histological classification:~Acute antibody-mediated rejection - documented anti-donor antibody ('suspicious for' if antibody not demonstrated):~Grade I: acute tubular necrosis-like - complement split product positive (C4d+), minimal inflammation;~Grade II: capillary-margination and/or thromboses, C4d+~Grade III: arterial - v3, C4d+.~A biopsy confirmed acute rejection was an event of suspected acute rejection confirmed by a graft biopsy result of Banff grade ≥ 1.~The Kaplan-Meier estimate of biopsy-confirmed antibody-mediated acute rejection within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit." (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo2.9
Alefacept3.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-Confirmed Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection as Assessed by Central Review at Month 6

"Biopsies were graded by the central reviewer according to the Banff 97/05 updated histological classification. A biopsy confirmed acute rejection was an event of suspected acute rejection confirmed by a graft biopsy result of Banff grade ≥ 1.~The Kaplan-Meier estimate of biopsy-confirmed acute T-cell mediated rejection within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit." (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo9.6
Alefacept7.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection at Month 6 Assessed by Local Review

"Biopsies were graded by the clinical site pathologist.according to the Banff 97/05 updated histological classification:~Grade IA: significant interstitial infiltration (>25% parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis;~Grade IB: significant interstitial infiltration (>25% parenchyma affected) and foci of severe tubulitis;~Grade IIA: mild to moderate intimal arteritis;~Grade IIB: severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area;~Grade III: transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocyte inflammation.~A biopsy confirmed acute rejection was an event of suspected acute rejection confirmed by a graft biopsy result of Banff grade ≥ 1.~The Kaplan-Meier estimate of biopsy-confirmed acute T-cell mediated rejection within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit." (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo6.7
Alefacept10.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Clinically Treated Acute Rejection at Month 6

Patients who received immunosuppressive medications for the treatment of suspected or biopsy-confirmed acute rejections were considered to have a clinically-treated acute rejection. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of clinically treated acute rejection within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow-up visit. (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo24.8
Alefacept15.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Delayed Graft Function

Delayed graft function was defined as the requirement for dialysis within the first week post-transplant. (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 1 week

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo12.1
Alefacept7.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure at Month 6

"Efficacy failure is defined as death, graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute T-cell mediated rejection assessed by local reading or lost to follow-up.~The Kaplan-Meier estimate of efficacy failure within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported." (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo15.0
Alefacept21.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Steroid-resistant Acute Rejection at Month 6

"A steroid-resistant acute rejection is defined as a rejection episode which did not resolve following treatment with corticosteroids. In the case that a rejection episode was not treated with corticosteroids first but only with antibodies, it was included in this category.~The Kaplan-Meier estimate of steroid-resistant acute rejection within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit." (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo7.6
Alefacept5.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Acute Mixed T-Cell Mediated and Antibody-Mediated Rejection at Month 6

"Biopsies were graded by the clinical site pathologist.according to the Banff 97/05 updated histological classification. A biopsy confirmed acute rejection was an event of suspected acute rejection confirmed by a graft biopsy result of Banff grade ≥ 1.~The Kaplan-Meier estimate of biopsy-confirmed acute mixed T-cell mediated and antibody-mediated rejections within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit." (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo0.0
Alefacept1.0

[back to top]

Change From Month 1 in Creatinine Clearance

The creatinine clearance was calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula. (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: Month 1, 3, and 6

,
InterventionmL/minute (Mean)
Change From Month 1 to Month 3 (n=81, 79)Change From Month 1 to Month 6 (n=77, 73)
Alefacept-0.58493.0227
Placebo3.03364.5388

[back to top]

Change From Month 1 in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

The GFR was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: Month 1, 3, and 6

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73 m² (Mean)
Change From Month 1 to Month 3 (n=93, 87)Change From Month 1 to Month 6 (n=83, 78)
Alefacept0.28892.5444
Placebo3.15482.4275

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure at Month 6

Treatment failure is defined as efficacy failure (death, graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute T-cell mediated rejection assessed by local reading, lost to follow-up) or early discontinuation of alefacept/placebo at any time (during the 12-week administration period) for any reason. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of treatment failure within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow-up visit. (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo20.6
Alefacept25.7

[back to top]

Change From Month 1 in Serum Creatinine

(NCT00617604)
Timeframe: Month 1, 3, and 6

,
Interventionµmol/L (Mean)
Change From Month 1 to Month 3 (n=94, 88)Change From Month 1 to Month 6 (n=86, 81)
Alefacept-5.0830-11.7212
Placebo-5.0125-6.1777

[back to top]

Maximum Histological Grade of All Biopsies After Local Review

"The grade of acute rejection was classified according to Banff 97/05 updated version. If a patient had more than 1 rejection episode, the episode with the most severe grade was used.~Acute T-cell mediated rejection:~Grade IA: significant interstitial infiltration (>25% parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis;~Grade IB: significant interstitial infiltration (>25% parenchyma affected) and foci of severe tubulitis;~Grade IIA: mild to moderate intimal arteritis;~Grade IIB: severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area;~Grade III: transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocyte inflammation.~Acute antibody-mediated rejection:~Grade I: acute tubular necrosis-like - complement split product positive (C4d+), minimal inflammation;~Grade II: capillary-margination and/or thromboses, C4d+~Grade III: arterial - v3, C4d+." (NCT00617604)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
T-Cell Mediated Rejection - No EventT-Cell Mediated Rejection - Grade IAT-Cell Mediated Rejection - Grade IBT-Cell Mediated Rejection - Grade IIAT-Cell Mediated Rejection - Grade IIBT-Cell Mediated Rejection - Grade IIIAntibody Mediated Rejection - No EventAntibody Mediated Rejection - Grade IAntibody Mediated Rejection - Grade IIAntibody Mediated Rejection - Grade III
Alefacept89.51.91.04.82.90.096.21.91.90.0
Placebo93.52.80.01.91.90.097.22.80.00.0

[back to top]

Incidence Rate of Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR) at Months 12 and 24

"tBPAR was defined as an acute rejection confirmed by biopsy with a Rejection Activity Index (RAI) score ≥ 3, which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. Liver biopsies were collected for all cases of suspected acute rejection preferably within 24 hours, at the latest within 48 hours, whenever clinically possible. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, they received a graft re-transplant, or they died.~The incidence rates of tBPAR were estimated with a Kaplan-Meier product-limit formula." (NCT00622869)
Timeframe: Randomization to Month 24

,,
InterventionPercentage (Number)
Month 12Month 24
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus3.04.8
Tacrolimus Control Arm7.27.7
Tacrolimus Elimination18.819.9

[back to top]

Change in Renal Function From Randomization to Months 12 and 24

"Change in renal function was assessed by the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) using the abbreviated (4 variables) Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-4) formula which was developed by the MDRD Study Group and has been validated in patients with chronic kidney disease. The MDRD-4 formula used for the eGFR calculation is: eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) = 186.3*(C^-1.154)*(A^-0.203)*G*R, where C is the serum concentration of creatinine (mg/dL), A is age (years), G=0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G=1, R=1.21 when race is black, otherwise R=1.~The changes in renal function were analyzed via analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment, pre-transplant hepatitis C virus status and randomization eGFR as covariates. Based on these ANCOVA analyses, the least-squares mean and standard errors of change were reported." (NCT00622869)
Timeframe: Randomization to Month 24

,,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Least Squares Mean)
Month 12 (N=244, 231, 243)Month 24 (N=245, 231, 243)
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus-2.23-7.94
Tacrolimus Control Arm-10.73-14.60
Tacrolimus Elimination-1.51-4.19

[back to top]

Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure From Randomization to Month 12

"Composite efficacy failure was defined as treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss, or death. A BPAR was defined as an acute rejection confirmed by biopsy with a Rejection Activity Index (RAI) score ≥ 3. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, they received a graft re-transplant, or they died.~The incidence rates of composite efficacy failure were estimated with a Kaplan-Meier product-limit formula." (NCT00622869)
Timeframe: Randomization to Month 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus6.7
Tacrolimus Elimination24.2
Tacrolimus Control Arm9.7

[back to top]

Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure From Randomization to Month 24

"Composite efficacy failure was defined as treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss, or death.~The incidence rates of composite efficacy failure were estimated with a Kaplan-Meier product-limit formula." (NCT00622869)
Timeframe: Randomization to Month 24

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus10.3
Tacrolimus Elimination26.0
Tacrolimus Control Arm12.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS)

The events will be defined as any one of the following: death; respiratory failure; renal failure, as defined by chronic dialysis > or = 6 months or kidney transplantation; occurrence of cardiomyopathy, confirmed by clinical CHF (New York Class III or IV) or LVEF < 30% by echocardiogram, sustained for at least 3 months despite therapy; organ dysfunction specific events must be documented on at least two occasions > or = 3 months apart, or sustained for a 3-month period (documented from the first occurrence). (NCT00622895)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment: Allogeneic HCT After Reduced Intensity Conditioning1

[back to top]

EFS

event-free survival after umbilical cord blood transplant (NCT00622895)
Timeframe: 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment: Allogeneic UCB After Reduced Intensity Conditioning1

[back to top]

Quality of Life as Assessed by the Modified Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ)

The questionnaire includes measure of quality of life and measure of the scale of skin tightness, activity level and function specifically designed for patients with systemic sclerosis (NCT00622895)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
pre-transplant SHAQ5 year post transplantpre-transplant Raynaud symptoms5 year post transplant Raynaud symptomspre-transplant Finger ulcer symptoms5 year post-transplant Finger ulcer symptomspre-transplant Overall health symptoms5 year post-transplant overall health symptoms
Treatment: Allogeneic HCT After Reduced Intensity Conditioning1.1250.12530.5302.50.2

[back to top]

Quality of Life as Assessed by the Medical Outcome Short Form (36) Health Survey Instrument (SF-36)

The Medical Outcome Short Form (36) Health Survey instrument (SF-36) is a general assessment of health quality of life with eight components: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, pain index, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems and Mental Health Index. Each domain is positively scored, indicating that higher scores are associated with positive outcome. (NCT00622895)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
SF-36 pretransplant overall scorepretransplant limitations due to physical healthpretransplant limitations due to emotional health
Treatment: Allogeneic HCT After Reduced Intensity Conditioning49.35050

[back to top]

Incidence and Severity of Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)

The grading of acute and chronic GVHD will follow previously published guidelines and according to institutional standard of practice but will also include capture of symptoms and characterization of alternative causes. The highest level of organ abnormalities, the etiologies contributing to the abnormalities and biopsy results pertaining to GVHD will be identified. Since both GVHD and SSc involve the skin and the gastrointestinal tract, all diagnostic biopsies of these organs will be centrally reviewed by a study pathologist. (NCT00622895)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post-transplant

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
acute GVHD severity maximum gradechronic GVHD maximum grade
Treatment: Allogeneic HCT After Reduced Intensity Conditioning22

[back to top]

Skin Score

The skin score measure is a scale: the name of the scale is the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS). Total score of mRSS is from 0 to 51. Higher values represents worse skin score. Highest value is 51, represents very hidebound tight thick skin. Lowest value is 0, represent normal skin, no tightness. (NCT00622895)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post-transplant

Interventionunits on a scale (mRSS) (Number)
Pre-transplant (baseline) skin score5 year post-transplant skin score
Treatment: Allogeneic HCT After Reduced Intensity Conditioning174

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants With Definite and Probable Viral, Fungal, and Bacterial Infections

The percent of participants with definite and probable viral, fungal, and bacterial infections after transplant (NCT00622895)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment: Allogeneic HCT After Reduced Intensity Conditioning2

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Event is defined as death due to any cause. (NCT00622895)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment: Allogeneic HCT After Reduced Intensity Conditioning1

[back to top]

Incidence of Graft Rejection

Engraftment is defined as achieving > 5% donor peripheral blood T cell chimerism by Day 56 after HCT. Primary graft failure is defined as a donor peripheral blood T cell chimerism peak of < 5% by Day 56 post-HCT. Methodological requirements for chimerism are as defined by institutional standard of practice. Secondary Graft Failure is defined as documented engraftment followed by loss of the graft with donor peripheral blood T cell chimerism < 5% as demonstrated by a chimerism assay (NCT00622895)
Timeframe: Up to day +56

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment: Allogeneic HCT After Reduced Intensity Conditioning0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

achieved overall survival in regard to leukemia (NCT00623012)
Timeframe: up to 10 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Study Population2

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival

achieved disease free in regard to leukemia (NCT00623012)
Timeframe: up to 10 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Study Population2

[back to top]

Improvement of the Rate of Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) From the Accepted Rate of 74%.

Percentage of patients free from graft versus host disease (NCT00623012)
Timeframe: up to 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Study Population0

[back to top]

Tacrolimus Powder Dissolution Time

Tacrolimus Powder Dissolution Time during Sublingual Administration (minutes) (NCT00629122)
Timeframe: Day 3, minutes to powder dissolution

Interventionminutes (Median)
Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin)2.25
Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole)2.0

[back to top]

Cmax

Maximum concentration (ng/mL) (NCT00629122)
Timeframe: Day 3 and Day 8, at time of maximum concentration

,
Interventionng/mL (Median)
Day 3 (Sublingual)Day 8 (Oral)
Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin)9.64.6
Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole)14.019.5

[back to top]

C0 (ng/mL)

Trough concentration (NCT00629122)
Timeframe: Day 3 and Day 8, time 0 (before tacrolimus dose)

,
Interventionng/mL (Median)
Day 3 (Sublingual)Day 8 (Oral)
Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin)1.451.25
Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole)6.26.5

[back to top]

Tmax

Time to Maximum concentration (hours) (NCT00629122)
Timeframe: Day 3 and Day 8, time of maximum concentration

,
Interventionhours (Median)
Day 3 (Sublingual)Day 8 (Oral)
Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin)1.750.875
Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole)3.02.0

[back to top]

Estimated AUC 0-6

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve from 0-6 hours (mg-hr/L) (NCT00629122)
Timeframe: Day 3 and Day 8, calculated based on concentrations measured between hours 0 and 6

,
Interventionmg-hr/L (Number)
Patient 1 Sublingual (day 3)Patient 1 Oral (day 8)Patient 2 Sublingual (day 3)Patient 2 Oral (day 8)Patient 3 Sublingual (day 3)Patient 3 Oral (day 8)Patient 4 Sublingual (day 3)Patient 4 Oral (day 8)Patient 5 Sublingual (day 3)Patient 5 Oral (day 8)
Arm A (Tacrolimus and Nystatin)9.34.9NANANANANANA63.023.2
Arm B (Tacrolimus and Clotrimazole)NANA27.232.466.076.063.752.5NANA

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients That Experienced Graft Versus Host Disease

Incidence of acute GVHD grades 2-4 and chronic GVHD in this study population (NCT00639717)
Timeframe: 6 Months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Etanercept and ECP46

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Relapse by 6 Months

Relapse rate at 6 months. Relapse is defined as recurrence of disease. (NCT00639717)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Etanercept and ECP8

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Alive at 6 Months

Overall survival at 6 months (NCT00639717)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Etanercept and ECP83

[back to top]

The % Change From Baseline to Week 4 (or End of Treatment) in the IGA.

"Investigator Global Assessment: Investigator's Global Assessment of severity integrates all lesions for overall score. This measure is commonly used as a quick and simple way to quantify disease severity both for clinical studies and in a non-study clinic setting. Score ranges from '0' = clear or No inflammatory signs of AD to '4' = Very Severe Disease with severe erythema and severe papulation/infiltration with oozing/crusting." (NCT00654355)
Timeframe: Week 4

Intervention% change in IGA (Median)
Control Group-33
Extra Visit Group-33

[back to top]

EASI

Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI): Disease severity will be assessed by a physician with the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI). This measure is commonly used and well validated instrument of eczema severity. It is weighted for area in each of the four body regions (which differs for adults and children under 7) and scores erythema, excoriation, induration/papulation, and lichenification. The total scores range from 0-72. Higher scores represent more severe eczema. (NCT00654355)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Control Group2.1
Extra Visit Group1

[back to top]

Adherence

"adherence to topical therapy in children via MEMS cap in a real-life clinic population measured as the % of required applications completed" (NCT00654355)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionpercentage of required applicaitons (Median)
Control Group56
Extra Visit Group72

[back to top]

Number of Patients Presenting With Insulin Independence at Day 365 Post First and Last Transplant

"Number of patients presenting with insulin independence, including:~Absence of exogenous insulin injection reported at Day 365.~Fasting capillary glucose level not exceeding 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) more than 3 times in a week (based on measuring capillary glucose levels a minimum of 7 times in a 7-day period) at Day 365 ± 28 days.~Fasting plasma glucose level ≤ 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) at Day 365 ± 28 days (if the fasting plasma glucose level is > 126 mg/dL [7.0 mmol/L], it must have been confirmed in an additional 1 out of 2 measurements).~Two-hour post-prandial capillary glucose not exceeding 180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L) more than 1 out of every 7 times in a week (based on measuring capillary glucose levels a minimum of 7 times in a 7-day period) at Day 365 ± 28 days.~Evidence of endogenous insulin production defined as fasting or stimulated C-peptide levels ≥ 0.5 ng/mL (0.16 nmol/L) at Day 365 ± 28 days" (NCT00679042)
Timeframe: 1 year after islet infusion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
First Tx Day 365 Absence of exogenous insulinLast Tx Day 365 Absence of exogenous insulinFirst Tx Day 365 Fasting capillary glucose in a week not exceeding 140 mg/dL more than 3XLast Tx Day 365 Fasting capillary glucose in a week not exceeding 140 mg/dL more than 3XFirst Tx Day 365 Fasting plasma glucose ≤126 mg/dLLast Tx Day 365 Fasting plasma glucose ≤126 mg/dLFirst Tx Day 365 Post-prandial capillary glucose in a week: Not exceeding 180 mg/dL more than 1X/7XLast Tx Day 365 Post-prandial capillary glucose in a week: Not exceeding 180 mg/dL more than 1X/7XFirst Tx Day 365 C-peptide (fasting or stimulated) ≥0.5 ng/mLLast Tx Day 365 C-peptide (fasting or stimulated) ≥0.5 ng/mL
Treatment1012741011531010

[back to top]

Hypoglycemic Episodes by HYPO Score

"Hypoglycemic episodes will be measured by the Ryan hypoglycemic (HYPO) Score derived from the number and severity of hypoglycemic episodes recorded throughout the follow-up phase from Day 28 to Day 365.~(From Ryan et al., 2004) A HYPO score was generated based on a combination of scores from the 4 weeks of readings and the patients' self-reported episodes over the previous year using the scoring system found in online appendix 2 (available at http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org). The record sheets returned by the patients were analyzed for the number of episodes of glucose values recorded as <2.5 mmol/l and between 2.5 and 2.9 mmol/l. Points were awarded if symptoms were absent or were neuroglycopenic rather than autonomic... Thus the more severe the problem with hypoglycemia, the higher the score. A Ryan score ranges from 0 (no event) to a cumulative sum of episode points of total events reported during the 4 weeks then multiplied by 13 to provide a 1-year value." (NCT00679042)
Timeframe: One year after the last transplant

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Baseline (pre-Tx)First Tx Day 365Last Tx Day 365
Treatment26640.618.7

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Reaching the Efficacy Goal

"A successful primary endpoint was defined as HbA1c ≤ 6.5% at the one-year follow-up visit and absence of severe hypoglycemic events (SHE) from Day 28 post-first transplant to 1 year after first and last transplant.~The primary analysis was to estimate the true rate of the composite favorable outcome at 1 year following first and last transplant in patients in the ITT population." (NCT00679042)
Timeframe: One year after islet transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Success at 1 yr post first transplantSuccess at 1 yr post last transplant
Treatment811

[back to top]

Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Safety endpoints: Incidence and severity of events related to islet infusion, immunosuppression, and islet preparations (NCT00679042)
Timeframe: From first islet transplant through one year after last transplant (maximum 3 infusions possible), an average of 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAESerious TEAETEAEs rated as severe or beyondTEAEs leading to death or discontinuation
Treatment2111160

[back to top]

Reduction in Hypoglycemic Severity Measured by %Reduction in HYPO Score

%reduction in Ryan HYPO Score [%(baseline score - 1-year post transplant score)/baseline] at time of evaluation. (NCT00679042)
Timeframe: One year after the first and last transplant

Interventionpercentage of HYPO baseline (Mean)
% Reduction from baseline to first tx day 365% Reduction from baseline to last tx day 365
Treatment66.190.1

[back to top]

The Clinical Efficacy of Topical Steroid and Topical Tacrolimus Therapies for the Treatment of Oral cGHVD.

Participants were given a survey at the time of screening and 4 weeks after start of therapy. The participants self-reported three symptoms of oral cGVHD: oral sensitivity, mouth pain, and mouth dryness. Each symptom was given a score ranging from 0-10, with 0 as none and 10 as the worst. Improvement in subjective scores was defined as 3 points or further reduction from pre-treatment to post-treatment assessment. (NCT00686855)
Timeframe: Participants were assessed at Baseline and 4 weeks after start of therapy

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Improvement in Oral SensitivityImprovement in Mouth PainImprovement in Mouth DrynessImprovement in 1 or more areasImprovement in 2 or more areasImprovement in all 3 areas
Dexamethasone15111117137
Tacrolimus325721

[back to top]

Stimulation of Growth After 12 Months (Delta Z-score)

(NCT00707759)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
A: Withdrawal Steroids1.2
B: Control Steroids0.6

[back to top]

Relapse

Patients with different disease relapses was determined according to current clinical standards based on the disease. For example, AML or MDS relapse is determined by a bone marrow biopsy. Multiple myeloma relapse requires a number of labs and/or biopsy to diagnose such as SPEP, UPEP, immunofixation, serum and urine light chains. In lymphoma disease is followed using CT and/or PET scans. (NCT00709592)
Timeframe: 2 year relapse rate (%)

InterventionPercent patients relapsing (Number)
A:Thymoglobulin: 1.7 mg/kg/Day28
B:Thymoglobulin: 2.5 mg/kg/Day50

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

(NCT00709592)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A:Thymoglobulin: 1.7 mg/kg/Day62.2
B:Thymoglobulin: 2.5 mg/kg/Day44.5

[back to top]

The Comparison of Functional Immune Reconstitution at 6-9 Months Following Transplant as Measured by Antibody Response to Vaccination With Inactivated Hepatitis A or B Vaccine.

A positive test result will indicate immune reconstitution, while a negative test results will indicate lack of immune reconstitution. Participants not done (ND) will be counted with the negative (Neg). (NCT00709592)
Timeframe: Up to 9 months following transplant

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
PositiveNegative/Not Done
A:Thymoglobulin: 1.7 mg/kg/Day811
B:Thymoglobulin: 2.5 mg/kg/Day319

[back to top] [back to top]

Engraftment of Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cells, as Measured by Time in Days to Neutrophil and Platelet Count Recovery Following Allogeneic PBSCT.

(NCT00709592)
Timeframe: Up to 52 weeks post transplant.

InterventionDays (Median)
A:Thymoglobulin: 1.7 mg/kg/Day12
B:Thymoglobulin: 2.5 mg/kg/Day12

[back to top]

Donor Lymphocyte Infusion

(NCT00709592)
Timeframe: 2 year rate of DLI

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A:Thymoglobulin: 1.7 mg/kg/Day8.9
B:Thymoglobulin: 2.5 mg/kg/Day45.5

[back to top]

Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD)

(NCT00709592)
Timeframe: 2 year rate (%)

Interventionpercentage of participant (Number)
A:Thymoglobulin: 1.7 mg/kg/Day27.2
B:Thymoglobulin: 2.5 mg/kg/Day4.5

[back to top]

Survival

(NCT00709592)
Timeframe: 2-year survival rate (%)

Interventionpercentage of patient surviving (Number)
A:Thymoglobulin: 1.7 mg/kg/Day71.3
B:Thymoglobulin: 2.5 mg/kg/Day62.4

[back to top]

Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD)

(NCT00709592)
Timeframe: 2 year GVHD rate

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A:Thymoglobulin: 1.7 mg/kg/Day23.8
B:Thymoglobulin: 2.5 mg/kg/Day31.8

[back to top]

Incidence of Rituximab Response to Reactivated EBV Without PTLD

"Participants who developed plasma EBV-DNA of >1000 copies/mL on any tests received rituximab.~Incidence of Rituximab Response: Reactivated EBV participants whose plasma titers cleared after rituximab, without post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD)." (NCT00720629)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
First Study Stage: Study Treatment6

[back to top]

Incidence of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Reactivation

Number of participants who reactivated EBV. Patients had their plasma tested once weekly using the TaqMan polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for quantitative determination of EBV-DNA for 6 weeks. Plasma levels > 1000 copies per ml plasma were scored as positive. (NCT00720629)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
First Study Stage: Study Treatment6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Score at 100 Days

"Cumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD Score at 100 Days. Investigators had planned to assess whether the grade of acute GVHD was decreased by visilizumab in combination with tacrolimus/methotrexate compared to standard treatment with thymoglobulin/tacrolimus/methotrexate after transplantation from unrelated mismatched donors, from day of transplant up to one year. Study was closed during the first treatment stage and did not proceed to the second stage treatment comparison to ATG in combination with tacrolimus/methotrexate as originally planned.~Overall GVHD Grade: From Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, etal: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: I. Diagnosis and Staging Working Group Report. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 11:945-955 (2005). Grade I: Skin Stage 1-2, Liver Stage 0, Gut State 0; Grade II: Skin Stage 3 or, Liver Stage 1 or, Gut Stage 1; Grade II" (NCT00720629)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade II-IV Acute GVHDGrade I-II Acute GVHDGrade III-IV Acute GVHD
First Study Stage: Study Treatment862

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Median OS in days. Survival was measured from the time of transplant to the time of death. (NCT00720629)
Timeframe: At 2 years and 5 years

Interventiondays (Median)
2 Year Analysis Group197
5 Year Analysis Group1803

[back to top]

Pharmacodynamics of Visilizumab - Test 2

Mean terminal half-life (±SD) (NCT00720629)
Timeframe: Up to 205 hours

Interventionhours (Mean)
First Study Stage: Study Treatment157

[back to top]

Pharmacodynamics of Visilizumab - Test 1

Mean Cmax (±SD) (NCT00720629)
Timeframe: At 1 - 2 hours

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
First Study Stage: Study Treatment1564

[back to top]

Incidence of Opportunistic Infection

(NCT00731874)
Timeframe: 36 months post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 (Target Tacrolimus 6 to 8 ng/mL)1
Arm 2 (Target Tacrolimus 3 to 5 ng/mL)1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection and/or Progression of Histologically Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy at 15 Months After Transplantation.

(NCT00731874)
Timeframe: 15 months post-transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm 1 (Target Tacrolimus 6 to 8 ng/mL)0
Arm 2 (Target Tacrolimus 3 to 5 ng/mL)1

[back to top]

Patient Survival

(NCT00731874)
Timeframe: 36 months post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 (Target Tacrolimus 6 to 8 ng/mL)10
Arm 2 (Target Tacrolimus 3 to 5 ng/mL)13

[back to top]

Development of Donor Specific Antibody (DSA)

Percent of subjects who developed new donor specific antibody (mean fluorescence intensity > 3,000) after enrollment, within 36 months of transplant (NCT00731874)
Timeframe: 36 months post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 (Target Tacrolimus 6 to 8 ng/mL)0
Arm 2 (Target Tacrolimus 3 to 5 ng/mL)5

[back to top]

Development of New Onset Diabetes Mellitus

(NCT00731874)
Timeframe: 36 months post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 (Target Tacrolimus 6 to 8 ng/mL)1
Arm 2 (Target Tacrolimus 3 to 5 ng/mL)2

[back to top]

Graft Survival

(NCT00731874)
Timeframe: 36 months post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 (Target Tacrolimus 6 to 8 ng/mL)10
Arm 2 (Target Tacrolimus 3 to 5 ng/mL)12

[back to top]

Incidence of Acute Rejection

Incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (NCT00731874)
Timeframe: 36 months post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 (Target Tacrolimus 6 to 8 ng/mL)0
Arm 2 (Target Tacrolimus 3 to 5 ng/mL)5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure at 12 Months Post-Transplant

Treatment failure was defined by the occurrence of any of the following: use of additional maintenance immunosuppressive medication not specified in the assigned treatment group; discontinuation of any of the assigned immunosuppressants for more than 14 consecutive days or 30 cumulative days; graft loss or return to chronic dialysis; or death. (NCT00758602)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
MMF, Standard Dose Tacrolimus9.6
MMF, Low Dose Tacrolimus6.6

[back to top]

Participant and Graft Survival

The percentage of participants surviving with grafts intact at 6 and 12 months after renal transplant. (NCT00758602)
Timeframe: Months 6 and 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6 months post-transplant12 months post-transplant
MMF, Low Dose Tacrolimus100.099.1
MMF, Standard Dose Tacrolimus100.0100.0

[back to top]

Time to First Acute Rejection Post-Transplant

The median time, in days, between randomization and acute rejection. (NCT00758602)
Timeframe: BL, Weeks 2, 4, 13, 26, 39, and 52

Interventiondays (Median)
MMF, Standard Dose Tacrolimus40
MMF, Low Dose Tacrolimus18

[back to top]

Chronic Allograft Damage Index (CADI) Score at Month 12 After Transplantation

CADI scoring was defined for 6 histological categories: interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration (0 equals (=) no or mild inflammation, 1=approximately (~)25 percent (%) cell infiltration, 2=26-50% cell infiltration, and 3=greater than (>)50% cell infiltration); interstitial fibrosis (0=none, 1=~25% interstitial affected, 2=26-50% interstitial affected, and 3=>50% interstitial affected); tubular atrophy (0=none, 1=~15% proximal tubular atrophy [PTA], 2=16-30% PTA, and 3=>30% PTA); mesangial matrix proliferation (MMP; 0=none, 1=25% non-glomerulosclerosis [NGS] combined with moderate MMP, 2=25-50% NGS combined with MMP, and 3=>50% NGS combined with MMP); glomerular sclerosis (0=none, 1=~15% glomerulus affected, 2=16-50% glomerulus affected, and 3=>50% glomerulus affected); endothelial proliferation (EP; 0=none, 1=EP to less than (<)25% remaining artery/small artery membrane [RA/SAM], 2=EP to 26-50% [RA/SAM], and 3=>50% [RA/SAM]). CADI score was the sum of the 6 histological findings. (NCT00758602)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
MMF, Standard Dose Tacrolimus1.82
MMF, Low Dose Tacrolimus2.13

[back to top]

Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 12 After Transplantation

GFR was determined using the Cockcroft-Gault formula to calculate the creatinine clearance, at Month 12 after renal transplantation. For males, creatinine clearance [milliliters per minute (mL/min)] = [(140 minus age) multiplied by (*) (body weight in kg) divided by [72 * serum creatinine mg per deciliter (mg/dL)]. For females, creatinine clearance (mL/min) = 0.85 * [(140 minus age) * (body weight in kg)] divided by [72 * serum creatinine (mg/dL)]. (NCT00758602)
Timeframe: Month 12

InterventionmL/min (Mean)
MMF, Standard Dose Tacrolimus77.08
MMF, Low Dose Tacrolimus80.12

[back to top]

Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) (mL/Min)

The mean GFR values in mL/min at BL, Weeks 2, 4, 13, 26, 39, and 52. (NCT00758602)
Timeframe: BL, Weeks 2, 4, 13, 26, 39, and 52

,
InterventionmL/min (Mean)
Baseline (n=95,96)Week 2 (n=101,102)Week 4 (n=99,98)Week 13 (n=88,91)Week 26 (n=84,83)Week 39 (n=83,77)Week 52 (n=86,82)
MMF, Low Dose Tacrolimus15.4171.0272.8775.7176.7778.0080.12
MMF, Standard Dose Tacrolimus14.3767.9571.7778.1375.9277.3477.08

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Acute Rejection, Graft Loss, or Death at 6 and 12 Months Post-Transplant

(NCT00758602)
Timeframe: Months 6 and 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Acute rejection, 6 months post-transplantAcute rejection, 12 months post-transplantGraft loss, 6 months post-transplantGraft loss, 12 months post-transplantDeath, 6 months post-transplantDeath, 12 months post-transplant
MMF, Low Dose Tacrolimus5.25.20.00.00.00.9
MMF, Standard Dose Tacrolimus2.62.60.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

Time to First Acute Rejection Post-Transplant - Number of Participants With an Event

(NCT00758602)
Timeframe: BL, Weeks 2, 4, 13, 26, 39, and 52

Interventionparticipants (Number)
MMF, Standard Dose Tacrolimus2
MMF, Low Dose Tacrolimus4

[back to top]

Serum Creatinine (Micromoles Per Liter [µmol/L])

The mean serum creatinine values in µmol/L at Baseline (BL), Weeks 2, 4, 13, 26, 39, and 52. (NCT00758602)
Timeframe: BL, Weeks 2, 4, 13, 26, 39, and 52

,
Interventionµmol/L (Mean)
Baseline (n=95,96)Week 2 (n=101,102)Week 4 (n=99,98)Week 13 (n=88,91)Week 26 (n=84,83)Week 39 (n=83,77)Week 52 (n=86,82)
MMF, Standard Dose Tacrolimus662.93154.57118.4797.52105.70102.22103.10
MMFl, Low Dose Tacrolimus639.70115.71107.08100.1097.5195.1694.19

[back to top]

Comparative Pharmacokinetics Between LCP-Tacro and Prograf Within 14 Days After Kidney Transplantation.

To compare the pharmacokinetics (AUC, Cmax, C24/Cmin) on Days 1, 7 and 14 of LCP-Tacro with the pharmacokinetics of Prograf in adult de novo kidney transplant patients. (NCT00765661)
Timeframe: 14 days

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
CmaxCmin
Group A28.2110.37
Group B20.278.12

[back to top]

Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf in Adult de Novo Kidney Transplant Patients.

"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LCP-Tacro compared to Prograf in the first 12 months after kidney transplantation.~Efficacy was assessed by monitoring biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) according to the Banff criteria, graft failure (defined by a patient starting dialysis for at least 30 days, nephrectomy, retransplantation, or death with a functioning graft), patient survival, and renal function based on serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR), based on serum creatinine, serum urea nitrogen, and serum albumin." (NCT00765661)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BPARGraft FailureDeath
Group A000
Group B020

[back to top]

Comparative Pharmacokinetics Between LCP-Tacro and Prograf Within 14 Days After Kidney Transplantation.

To compare the pharmacokinetics (AUC, Cmax, C24/Cmin) on Days 1, 7 and 14 of LCP-Tacro with the pharmacokinetics of Prograf in adult de novo kidney transplant patients. (NCT00765661)
Timeframe: 14 days

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
Group A349.31
Group B255.22

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics of LCP-Tacro™ Tablets in the First 14 Days After Transplantation in Adult de Novo Kidney Recipients.

Comparison of the proportion of patients achieving sufficient tacrolimus whole blood trough levels (7 to 20 ng/mL) during the first 14 days post-transplantation (NCT00765661)
Timeframe: 14 days

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Group A78.57
Group B57.14

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients in Each Treatment Group Achieving Sufficient Tacrolimus Whole Blood Trough Levels (5 to 20 ng/mL) During the First 14 Days Post-transplantation.

Percentage of patients with trough levels within the therapeutic range of 5 to 20 ng/mL was assessed during the initial 14 days (on days 1, 7 and 14) after liver transplant and compared between the two treatment groups. (NCT00772148)
Timeframe: 7 days

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
LCP-Tacro78.26
Prograf (Tacrolimus)75

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (AUC0-24) of LCP-Tacro™ Compared to Prograf Early After Transplantations (Within the First 14 Days) in Adult de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients.

The pharmacokinetic parameter (AUC, 0 to 24 hours post dose) was evaluated during the first 14 days after liver transplant (on days 1, 7 and 14). The results for Day 14 is listed below as the primary outcome parameter for this study. (NCT00772148)
Timeframe: 14 days

Interventionng/mL*hr (Mean)
LCP-Tacro279.59
Prograf (Tacrolimus)241.22

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (Cmax and Cmin) of LCP-Tacro™ Compared to Prograf Early After Transplantations (Within the First 14 Days) in Adult de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients.

The pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax and Cmin) were evaluated during the first 14 days after liver transplant (on days 1, 7 and 14). The results for Day 14 is listed below as the primary outcome parameter for this study. (NCT00772148)
Timeframe: 14 days

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
CmaxCmin
LCP-Tacro21.307.41
Prograf (Tacrolimus)22.957.56

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients in Each Treatment Group Achieving Sufficient Tacrolimus Whole Blood Trough Levels (5 to 20 ng/mL) During the First 14 Days Post-transplantation.

Percentage of patients with trough levels within the therapeutic range of 5 to 20 ng/mL was assessed during the initial 14 days (on days 1, 7 and 14) after liver transplant and compared between the two treatment groups. (NCT00772148)
Timeframe: 14 days

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
LCP-Tacro85.71
Prograf (Tacrolimus)91.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients in Each Treatment Group Achieving Sufficient Tacrolimus Whole Blood Trough Levels (5 to 20 ng/mL) During the First 14 Days Post-transplantation.

Percentage of patients with trough levels within the therapeutic range of 5 to 20 ng/mL was assessed during the initial 14 days (on days 1, 7 and 14) after liver transplant and compared between the two treatment groups. (NCT00772148)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
LCP-Tacro13.79
Prograf (Tacrolimus)32.14

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Died Within the 360 Days.

Number of patients who died was compared between the two groups during the study. (NCT00772148)
Timeframe: 360 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
LCP-Tacro2
Prograf (Tacrolimus)2

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival at 12 Months

Disease free survival refers to patients with no evidence of disease after transplant, at the 12 month time point. (NCT00782379)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haploidentical Transplant7

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival at Day 100

Disease free survival refers to patients with no evidence of disease after transplant, at the Day 100 time point. (NCT00782379)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haploidentical Transplant16

[back to top]

Incidence of Graft Rejection for Patients at Day 100

Number of patients who experienced graft rejection by Day 100 (NCT00782379)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haploidentical Transplant0

[back to top]

Achievement of >90% (Full) Donor Chimerism in the T-Cell Lineage as Measured by PCR at Day 30 Post-transplantation

Chimerism analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells using PCR (polymerase chain reaction) for STR/VNTR (short tandme repeat/variable number tandem repeat) will be performed post transplant. On each occasion, the peripheral blood will be separated into the T-cell component (using e.g. CD3 selection) and the myeloid component (using e.g.CD14/15 selection) before assessment of chimerism. (NCT00782379)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haploidentical Transplant18

[back to top]

Achievement of >90% (Full) Donor Chimerism in the T-Cell Lineage as Measured by PCR at Day 60 Post-transplantation

Chimerism analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells using PCR for STR/VNTR will be performed post transplant. On each occasion, the peripheral blood will be separated into the T-cell component (using e.g. CD3 selection) and the myeloid component (using e.g.CD14/15 selection) before assessment of chimerism. (NCT00782379)
Timeframe: Day 60

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haploidentical Transplant18

[back to top]

Achievement of >90% (Full) Donor Chimerism in the T-Cell Lineage as Measured by PCR at Day 90 Post-transplantation

Chimerism analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells using PCR for STR/VNTR will be performed post transplant. On each occasion, the peripheral blood will be separated into the T-cell component (using e.g. CD3 selection) and the myeloid component (using e.g.CD14/15 selection) before assessment of chimerism. (NCT00782379)
Timeframe: Day 90

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haploidentical Transplant13

[back to top]

Non-relapse Mortality at 1 Year After Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (PBSCT)

Non-relapse mortality refers to whether a patient dies of causes related to something other than the primary disease. (NCT00782379)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haploidentical Transplant2

[back to top]

Non-relapse Mortality at Day 100 After Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (PBSCT)

(NCT00782379)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haploidentical Transplant2

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Experienced Severe Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)(Grade 3 or 4)

Number of patients who experienced post-transplant complication (GVHD) as seen by clinical evidence (NCT00782379)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haploidentical Transplant2

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 12 Months

Overall survival, defined as a patient being alive after transplant, is without regard to disease status. (NCT00782379)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haploidentical Transplant14

[back to top]

Overall Survival at Day 100

Overall survival is assessed, without regard to disease status, post-transplant, at Day 100. (NCT00782379)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Haploidentical Transplant17

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) at 24 Months

Disease Free survival is measured by the amount of time a patient spends in a disease free state after being transplanted. (NCT00787761)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
RIC Transplant Using ATG, Busulfan, Fludarabine and Cytoxan13

[back to top]

Non-relapse Mortality (NRM) at Day 180 Post-transplantation

non-relapse mortality refers to the death of a patient for causes other than relapsed disease. (NCT00787761)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionparticipants (Number)
RIC Transplant Using ATG, Busulfan, Fludarabine and Cytoxan0

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing Extensive Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

Patients who had post-transplant complication (GVHD) as seen by clinical evidence including but not limited to skin rash, elevated liver function tests, nausea/vomiting/diarrhea. (NCT00787761)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
RIC Transplant Using ATG, Busulfan, Fludarabine and Cytoxan13

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Experience Severe (Grade 3 or 4) Acute Graft-versus-host Disease

number of patients who experienced post-transplant complication (GVHD) as seen by clinical evidence including but not limited to skin rash, elevated liver function tests, nausea/vomiting/diarrhea. (NCT00787761)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Severe Graft Versus Host Disease2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) at 24 Months

Overall survival refers to the length of time a patient is alive after transplant regardless of whether they have progressive or relapsed disease. (NCT00787761)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
RIC Transplant Using ATG, Busulfan, Fludarabine and Cytoxan16

[back to top]

Achievement of > 90% (Full) Donor Chimerism in the T-cell Lineage as Measured by PCR at Day 30 Post-transplantation

Chimerism analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells using PCR for STR/VNTR will be performed post transplant. On each occasion, the peripheral blood will be separated into the T-cell component (using e.g. CD3 selection) and the myeloid component (using e.g.CD14/15 selection) before assessment of chimerism. (NCT00787761)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Transplant Recipients12

[back to top]

T-cell and Myeloid Chimerism at Days 180 Post-transplantation (>90%)

Chimerism analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells using PCR for STR/VNTR will be performed post transplant. On each occasion, the peripheral blood will be separated into the T-cell component (using e.g. CD3 selection) and the myeloid component (using e.g.CD14/15 selection) before assessment of chimerism. (NCT00787761)
Timeframe: 180 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
RIC Transplant Using ATG, Busulfan, Fludarabine and Cytoxan19

[back to top]

T-cell and Myeloid Chimerism at Days 90 Post-transplantation (>90% Chimerism)

Chimerism analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells using PCR for STR/VNTR will be performed post transplant. On each occasion, the peripheral blood will be separated into the T-cell component (using e.g. CD3 selection) and the myeloid component (using e.g.CD14/15 selection) before assessment of chimerism. (NCT00787761)
Timeframe: Day 90

Interventionparticipants (Number)
RIC Transplant Using ATG, Busulfan, Fludarabine and Cytoxan17

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Chronic Extensive GVHD

Number of patients who developed chronic extensive GVHD post-transplant. The diagnosis of chronic GVHD requires at least one manifestation that is distinctive for chronic GVHD as opposed to acute GVHD. In all cases, infection and others causes must be ruled out in the differential diagnosis of chronic GVHD. (NCT00789776)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose 1 (2.5 x 10^6/kg NK Cells)2
Dose 2 (5.0 x 10^6/kg NK Cells)3

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Graft Failure

Graft failure is defined as grade IV thrombocytopenia and neutropenia after Day +21 that lasts >2 weeks and is refractory to growth factor support. (NCT00789776)
Timeframe: Day 100

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose 1 (2.5 x 10^6/kg NK Cells)0
Dose 2 (5.0 x 10^6/kg NK Cells)4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities

Defined as having at least one of the following adverse events, independent of the attribution to the Natural Killer cell infusion: grade IV infusional toxicity (based on the Adapted Common Toxicity Criteria); grade IV regimen-related toxicity (based on Adapted Common Toxicity Criteria); grade IV acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease; non-relapse mortality. (NCT00789776)
Timeframe: Day 35 (28 days after NK cell infusion)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose 1 (2.5 x 10^6/kg NK Cells)0
Dose 2 (5.0 x 10^6/kg NK Cells)0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grades III-IV Acute GVHD

"Number of patients who developed acute GVHD post-transplant. aGVHD Stages~Skin:~a maculopapular eruption involving < 25% BSA a maculopapular eruption involving 25 - 50% BSA generalized erythroderma generalized erythroderma with bullous formation and often with desquamation~Liver:~bilirubin 2.0 - 3.0 mg/100 mL bilirubin 3 - 5.9 mg/100 mL bilirubin 6 - 14.9 mg/100 mL bilirubin > 15 mg/100 mL~Gut:~Diarrhea is graded 1 - 4 in severity. Nausea and vomiting and/or anorexia caused by GVHD is assigned as 1 in severity. The severity of gut involvement is assigned to the most severe involvement noted. Patients with visible bloody diarrhea are at least stage 2 gut and grade 3 overall.~aGVHD Grades Grade III: Stage 2 - 4 gut involvement and/or stage 2 - 4 liver involvement Grade IV: Pattern and severity of GVHD similar to grade 3 with extreme constitutional symptoms or death" (NCT00789776)
Timeframe: Day 100

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose 1 (2.5 x 10^6/kg NK Cells)1
Dose 2 (5.0 x 10^6/kg NK Cells)0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Relapsed Disease

"CML New cytogenetic abnormality and/or development of accelerated phase or blast crisis. The criteria for accelerated phase will be defined as unexplained fever greater than 38.3°C, new clonal cytogenetic abnormalities in addition to a single Ph-positive chromosome, marrow blasts and promyelocytes >20%.~AML, ALL >5% marrow blasts by morphologic or flow cytometric, or appearance of extramedullary disease.~CLL ≥1 of: Physical exam/Imaging studies (nodes, liver, and/or spleen) ≥50% increase or new, circulating lymphocytes by morphology and/or flow cytometry ≥50% increase, and lymph node biopsy w/ Richter's transformation.~NHL >25% increase in the sum of the products of the perpendicular diameters of marker lesions, or the appearance of new lesions.~MM~≥100% increase of the serum myeloma protein from its lowest level, or reappearance of myeloma peaks that had disappeared w/ treatment; or definite increase in the size or number of plasmacytomas or lytic bone lesions." (NCT00789776)
Timeframe: At 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose 1 (2.5 x 10^6/kg NK Cells)1
Dose 2 (5.0 x 10^6/kg NK Cells)10

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Surviving Post-transplant.

Number of subjects surviving post-transplant. (NCT00789776)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose 1 (2.5 x 10^6/kg NK Cells)5
Dose 2 (5.0 x 10^6/kg NK Cells)25

[back to top]

Number of Non-relapse Participant Mortalities

Defined as death in any patient for whom there has not been a diagnosis of relapse or disease progression. (NCT00789776)
Timeframe: Day 200

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose 1 (2.5 x 10^6/kg NK Cells)0
Dose 2 (5.0 x 10^6/kg NK Cells)0

[back to top]

Continuous Complete Remission (CCR) Rate

Will be testing using an exact binomial test (NCT00792948)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment57

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00792948)
Timeframe: From the date of initial registration on the study until death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years

InterventionProbability of surviving 12 months (Number)
Treatment0.88

[back to top]

Relapse-free Survival (RFS) After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00792948)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionProbability of 12-month RFS (Number)
Treatment0.83

[back to top]

Change in Renal Function

Change in renal function as seen in serum creatinine values from baseline until study completion or participant termination. Baseline is defined as the lowest serum creatinine collected during stabilization period or in the four weeks following the end of the stabilization period. The stabilization period is defined as four consecutive creatinine values close in value (not differing more than 0.3 mg/dL). Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. (NCT00801632)
Timeframe: Transplantation until study completion or participant termination (up to five years)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline Serum CreatinineStudy Termination/CompletionChange from Baseline
MEDI-5071.93.21.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Significant Invasive or Resistant Opportunistic Infection

Clinically significant invasive or resistant opportunistic infections include cytomegalovirus, herpes zoster, and candida. (NCT00801632)
Timeframe: Transplantation until study completion or participant termination (participants followed up to five years)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MEDI-5070

[back to top]

Time to Neutrophil Recovery Following Transplant

Time (in days) until neutrophil recovery following transplant. Neutrophil recovery is defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 500/mm^3 at three consecutive assessments on different days post-transplant. Time to recovery is time from transplantation until the first assessment date used to confirm the recovery. (NCT00801632)
Timeframe: Transplantation until study completion or participant termination (participants followed up to five years)

Interventiondays (Mean)
MEDI-50714.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Successfully Withdrawn Off of Immunosuppressant Medication for 104 Weeks

A participant was considered a success if they were off immunosuppressive therapy for 104 consecutive weeks leading up to study week 208 (48 months post-transplant) or study termination, whichever occurred first. (NCT00801632)
Timeframe: 48 months post-transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
MEDI-5073

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Graft Survival Through 156 Weeks

The percentage of participants with graft survival from transplantation through 156 weeks. Participants who terminated from the study prior to Week 156 without meeting the event were excluded. Graft survival is defined as the time to week 156 or graft loss. Graft loss is defined as the day on which a graft is deemed irreversibly nonfunctional and dialysis is begun, a transplantectomy is performed, or the participant is re-transplanted, whichever comes first. Six consecutive weeks of dialysis are required for the diagnosis of graft loss, though the date of graft loss will be defined as the date of first dialysis. (NCT00801632)
Timeframe: Transplantation until week 156

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MEDI-50780

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Surviving Through 156 Weeks

The percentage of participants who survived from transplantation through 156 weeks. Participants who terminated from the study prior to Week 156 without meeting the event were excluded. (NCT00801632)
Timeframe: Transplantation until week 156

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MEDI-507100

[back to top]

Time to Platelet Recovery Following Transplant

Time (in days) until platelet recovery following transplant. Platelet recovery is defined as a platelet count >20,000 /mm^3 and where no transfusion is required. Time to recovery is time from transplantation until platelet value recovers. (NCT00801632)
Timeframe: Transplantation until study completion or participant termination (participants followed up to five years)

Interventiondays (Mean)
MEDI-5071.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Acute Rejection

"The percentage of participants who experience an acute rejection. Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy with findings of Banff score of grade IA or higher. The Banff classification is as follows: grade IA is >25% of parenchyma affected and foci of moderate tubulitis; Grade IB is >25% of parenchyma affected and foci of severe tubulitis; Grade IIA is mild to moderate intimal arteritis; Grade IIB is severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area; Grade III is transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation." (NCT00801632)
Timeframe: Transplantation until study completion or participant termination (up to five years)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MEDI-50740

[back to top]

Incidence of Increased Absolute Numbers of Regulatory T Cells (Treg)

Absolute numbers of Treg at designated time points according to study arm. MTX = methotrexate/tacrolimus-treated patients; SIR = sirolimus/tacrolimus-treated patients; Treg absolute number units = number of cells/microL. A two-sided Wilcoxon's rank-sum test was employed to test differences in percent Treg (% Treg/total CD4+ cells). (NCT00803010)
Timeframe: 30 days and 90 days

,
InterventionCells/MicroL (Median)
30 Day Measure90 Day Measure
1 Tacrolimus / Rapamycin16.2714.6
2 Tacrolimus / Methotrexate9.879.67

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Evidence of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (aGVHD), Post Transplant

"Incidence of acute graft versus host disease grades 2-3 according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 3.~Graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) is a risk associated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT). Clinical evidence of acute GVHD was recorded per standard grading scheme.~Acute GVHD classified as the following:~classic acute GVHD - onset within 100 days after transplant~persistent - acute GVHD with onset prior to day 100 and without resolution beyond day 100~recurrent - acute GVHD recurrent after prior episode of acute GVHD~late acute GVHD - syndrome consistent with acute GVHD, without features of chronic GVHD, with onset occurring beyond 100 days" (NCT00803010)
Timeframe: 100 Days Post Transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1 Tacrolimus / Rapamycin43
2 Tacrolimus / Methotrexate89

[back to top]

2 Year Post Transplant Overall Survival (OS) Rate

Defined as time from transplantation (day 0 as day of stem cell infusion per standard nomenclature) to death from any cause . (NCT00803010)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1 Tacrolimus / Rapamycin61
2 Tacrolimus / Methotrexate69

[back to top]

Rejection-free Patient Survival With a Functioning Graft

(NCT00807144)
Timeframe: One and two years post kidney transplantation

,
Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
year 1year 2
Extended Release Tacrolimus8683.4
Standard Release Tacrolimus8480.1

[back to top]

Patient Survival With a Functioning Graft

(NCT00807144)
Timeframe: One year post kidney transplantation

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Extended Release Tacrolimus92.3
Standard Release Tacrolimus96

[back to top]

Number of Serious Adverse Events

The safety and feasibility will be partially measured by the number of serious adverse events (SAE) recorded by participants receiving at least one dose of Vorinostat. (NCT00810602)
Timeframe: 100 days

InterventionNumber of Serious Adverse Events (Number)
Vorinostat Prophylaxis33

[back to top]

Percent Cumulative Incidence of Relapse at 2 Years.

Determine the cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years. (NCT00810602)
Timeframe: two years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Vorinostat Prophylaxis16

[back to top]

100-day Cumulative Incidence of Grade 2-4 Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

Assess if the addition of Vorinostat to standard GVHD prophylaxis regimen can reduce the rate of grades 2-4 acute GVHD when compared to 48% in a cohort of identically treated RIC HSCT patients without vorinostat. A reduction of incidence to less than 25% will be considered successful. (NCT00810602)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Vorinostat Prophylaxis22

[back to top]

Percent Survival at 2-years

To determine 2-year overall survival rate (NCT00810602)
Timeframe: two years

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Vorinostat Prophylaxis73

[back to top]

Composite Endpoint for Efficacy Failure Within 12 Months of Randomization: Death, Graft Failure, Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection or Loss to Follow-up.

(NCT00817206)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
DeathGraft FailureBPARLoss to follow up
LCP-Tacro2010
Prograf (Tacrolimus)1041

[back to top]

Non-relapse Mortality at Day 100

patients are evaluable for their cause of death at Day 100 (NCT00818961)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation1

[back to top]

Survival at Day 100

Survival at Day 100 (NCT00818961)
Timeframe: 100 day

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation35

[back to top]

Platelet Engraftment

The number of patients experiencing platelet engraftment post-transplant (NCT00818961)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation35

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 1 Year

Evaluation of overall survival at 1 year (# of patients who are alive at 1 year post-transplant) (NCT00818961)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation26

[back to top]

Number of Patients Requiring the Use of Donor Leukocyte Infusion (DLI) for Early Mixed T-cell Chimerism

DLI is used for patients with mixed chimerism following transplant (NCT00818961)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation19

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD) Post-transplant

Patients will be evaluated up to 4 years post transplant (NCT00818961)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation0

[back to top]

Complete Donor Chimerism

Complete donor chimerism (defined as >/= 95% donor cells in peripheral blood CD3+ and CD33+ was measured. (NCT00818961)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation26

[back to top]

Neutrophil Recovery

The number of patients experiencing neutrophil recovery post transplant (NCT00818961)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation35

[back to top]

Non-relapse Mortality at 1 Year Post-transplant

Number of patients who died of non-relapse causes at one year. this is in clusive of all patients who were transplanted on study even though only 10 patients died at by 1 year time point. This outcome will be referenced in the donor chimerism outcome. Only 26/36 patients were eligible for this time point as that is all that were alive. (NCT00818961)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation4

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 2-4 Acute Graft-versus-host Disease Post-transplant

patients experiencing acute graft versus host disease post-transplant (NCT00818961)
Timeframe: patients were followed for 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation15

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease

(NCT00818961)
Timeframe: >100 days post-transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation20

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Less Than 100 Hepatitis C Virus RNA Copies/mL

Number of Participants with Undetectable or Less than 100 copies/ml Hepatitis C Viral Level --defined as SVR -Sustained Virologic Response (NCT00821587)
Timeframe: 6 months after completion of interferon based therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tacrolimus (TAC)7
Cyclosporine (CsA)7

[back to top]

Number of Patients That Engrafted Blood Counts by 30 Days After Transplant

Number of patients whose Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) recovered to >500 x10^3/uL for at least 3 consecutive days after transplant (NCT00827099)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant5

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Patient Who Gained Remission From the Nephrotic Syndrome

Efficacy of mycophenolate in preventing relapse of nephrotic syndrome secondary to membranous glomerulonephritis on withdrawal of tacrolimus therapy. (NCT00843856)
Timeframe: 10-109 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tacrolimus8
Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil8

[back to top]

Number of Patients Achieved Remission

The degree of remission of proteinuria obtained (complete or partial) The rate of decline of renal function measured by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation for glomerular filtration rate. (NCT00843856)
Timeframe: 6-12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tacrolimus16
Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil19

[back to top]

Engraftment

Engraftment is most commonly defined as the first of three consecutive days of achieving a sustained peripheral blood neutrophil count of >500 × 10^6/L . (NCT00857389)
Timeframe: up to 100 days post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Conditioning Reg- Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Clofarabine52

[back to top]

Graft vs Host Disease (GVHD)

Severity of toxicities graded according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Effects (CTCAE) v3.0. Standard reporting guidelines followed for adverse events. Safety data summarized by category, severity and frequency. (NCT00857389)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Conditioning Reg- Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Clofarabine34

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Disease Free Survival

Kaplan-Meier product limit method to estimate the disease free survival. (NCT00857389)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Conditioning Reg- Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Clofarabine32

[back to top]

Relapse Rate of Participants Treated With Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Clofarabine

Relapse Rate will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00857389)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Conditioning Reg- Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Clofarabine26

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate

Overall Survival Rate will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00857389)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post transplant

Interventiondays (Median)
Conditioning Reg- Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Clofarabine320

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Survival Rate at 100 Days Post-transplant

The toxicities will be monitored and scored on a daily basis following the methods of Simon R. Practical Bayesian Guideline for Phase IIB Clinical Trials. A Bayesian stopping rule will be used to stop the trial if there is a 90% chance that the true toxicity rate exceeds the target toxicity rate of 0.25. (NCT00857389)
Timeframe: 100 days post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Conditioning Reg- Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Clofarabine45

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

Severity of toxicities graded according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Effects (CTCAE) v3.0. Standard reporting guidelines followed for adverse events. Safety data summarized by category, severity and frequency. (NCT00857389)
Timeframe: up to 30 days post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Conditioning Reg- Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Clofarabine52

[back to top]

Incidence of Chronic GVHD

(NCT00860574)
Timeframe: at 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic Transplantation)20

[back to top]

Non Relapse Mortality Incidence

(NCT00860574)
Timeframe: 1 year after HCT

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic Transplantation)6

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

(NCT00860574)
Timeframe: at 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic Transplantation)71

[back to top]

Relapse Incidence

(NCT00860574)
Timeframe: At 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic Transplantation)18

[back to top]

Relapse-free Survival

(NCT00860574)
Timeframe: at 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic Transplantation)62

[back to top]

Incidence of Grades II-IV Acute GVHD

(NCT00860574)
Timeframe: at 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic Transplantation)57

[back to top]

Non Relapse Mortality (NRM) Incidence

Cumulative incidence of NRM at 6 months. NRM includes all deaths without relapse or disease progression. (NCT00860574)
Timeframe: At 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic Transplantation)6

[back to top]

Median Donor CD3 + T Lymphocyte Chimerism in Peripheral Blood

Donor chimerism was evaluated in peripheral blood T cells (NCT00860574)
Timeframe: Day 28 after HCT

Interventionpercentage of T cells (Median)
Treatment (Allogeneic Transplantation)100

[back to top]

Occurrence of Treatment Failures From Month 6 to 9 and Month 9 to 18

Treatment failure was defined as composite endpoint of biopsy proven acute rejection of ISHLT 1990 grade ≥ 3A resp. ISHLT 2004 grade ≥ 2R, acute rejection episodes associated with hemodynamic compromise, graft loss / re-transplant, death, loss to follow up (at least one condition must be present). If participant had an occurrence in each period it was counted for each period. (NCT00862979)
Timeframe: Month 6 to Month 9; Month 9 to Month 18

,
InterventionOccurences (Number)
Month 6 to Month 9 Treatment failure - all reasonsMonth 9 to Month 18 Treatment failure-all reasons
CNI-free-regimen415
CNI-regimen13

[back to top]

Occurrence of Major Cardiac Events (MACE) From Month 6 to 18

Major cardiac events (MACE) was defined as one of the following: any death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting (NCT00862979)
Timeframe: Month 6 to Month 18

,
InterventionOccurences (Number)
Myocardial infarctionDeath
CNI-free-regimen01
CNI-regimen10

[back to top]

Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) According to Cockcroft-Gault at Month 12 and 18

Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) according to Cockcroft-Gault at Month 12 and 18. For men: GFR=(140-Age) x Body weight (kg) / 72 x Serum Creatinine (mg/dl) For women: GFR=0.85 (140 -Age) x Body weight(kg)/ 72 x Serum Creatinine (mg/dl) (NCT00862979)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 18

,
InterventionmL/min (Mean)
Month 12Month 18
CNI-free-regimen69.866.9
CNI-regimen54.254.2

[back to top]

Reciprocal Creatinine Slope Between Month 6 and Month 18

Reciprocal Creatinine Slope is an indication of renal function over time with a higher slope value indicating an improvement in renal function. (NCT00862979)
Timeframe: Between Month 6 and Month 18

Intervention1/(μmol/L)/(hour) (Mean)
CNI-regimen0.045
CNI-free-regimen0.403

[back to top]

Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) Using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Formula at Month 18

Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) Using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Formula at Month 18 cGFR (in mL/min/1.73 m2) = 186.3*(C-1.154)*(A-0.203)*G*R where C = the serum concentration of creatinine (mg/dL), A = age (years), G = 0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G = 1, R = 1.21 when race is black, otherwise R = 1. (NCT00862979)
Timeframe: Month 18

InterventionmL/min (Mean)
CNI-regimen54.2
CNI-free-regimen66.9

[back to top]

Serum Creatinine at Month 6, 8, 9, 10 12 and 18

Serum Creatinine is an indicator of renal function measured in the blood (NCT00862979)
Timeframe: Month 6, 8, 9, 10 12 and 18

,
Interventionμmol/L (Mean)
Month 6Month 8Month 9Month 10Month 12Month 18
CNI-free-regimen1.491.271.241.201.221.27
CNI-regimen1.531.441.581.531.531.50

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement of ≥5 mL/Min/m^2 in Calculated GFR at 12 and 24 Months Post-Transplantation (Intent-to-Treat [ITT] Analysis)

GFR was calculated using the MDRD equation using either serum creatinine traceable to IDMS or serum creatinine not traceable to IDMS. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 12Month 24
Sirolimus38.233.6
Tacrolimus42.340.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement of ≥7.5 mL/Min/m^2 in Calculated GFR at 12 and 24 Months Post-Transplantation

GFR was calculated using the MDRD equation using either serum creatinine traceable to IDMS or serum creatinine not traceable to IDMS. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 12Month 24
Sirolimus24.425.2
Tacrolimus35.830.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With New-Onset Diabetes

Participants were considered as having new onset diabetes during the On-therapy period if any of the below events emerged from baseline to Month 24: 1) at least 30 days continuous, or at least 25 days non-stop (without gap) use of any diabetic treatment after randomization; 2) a fasting glucose greater than or equal to (≥)126 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) after randomization; or 3) a non-fasting glucose ≥200 mg/dL after randomization, were included in the new-onset diabetes population. Events at Months 12 or 24 occurred from baseline to On-therapy Month 12 and from On-therapy Months 12 to 24, respectively. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: From Baseline to On-Therapy Month 12, from Baseline to On-Therapy Month 24, and from On-Therapy Month 12 up to On-Therapy Month 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
New onset (n=82,72)New onset at 1 year (n=82,72)New onset at 2 years (n=70,70)
Sirolimus18.314.64.3
Tacrolimus5.62.82.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With New-Onset Diabetes Receiving Treatment for Diabetes (Insulin and Non-Insulin)

Participants were considered as having new onset diabetes during the On-therapy period if any of the below events emerged between baseline and Month 12 or Month 24: 1) at least 30 days continuous, or at least 25 days non-stop (without gap) use of any diabetic treatment after randomization; 2) a fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL after randomization; or 3) a non-fasting glucose ≥200 mg/dL after randomization. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: 12 Months and 24 Months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Insulin (12-Month)Insulin (24-Month)Non-insulin (12-Month)Non-Insulin (24-Month)
Sirolimus13.36.713.313.3
Tacrolimus0.025.00.00.0

[back to top]

Serum Creatinine (On-Therapy Analysis)

Serum creatinine was measured in micromillimoles per liter (mcmol/L). Baseline was defined as the last nonmissing assessment before or on the date of the first dose of test article. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18, and 24

,
Interventionmcmol/L (Mean)
Baseline (n=131,123)Month 6 (n=125,120)Month 12 (n=109,116)Month 18 (n=99,111)Month 24 (n=86,109)
Sirolimus118.3113.9119.6116.9122.9
Tacrolimus117.7117.0109.4114.2117.5

[back to top]

Spot and 24 Hour Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPr/Cr)

Baseline was defined as the last nonmissing assessment before or on the date of the first dose of test article. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12 and 24

,
InterventionUPr/Cr (Mean)
Baseline (n=127,120)Month 12 (n=112,108)Month 24 (n=102,106)
Sirolimus0.1800.3530.510
Tacrolimus0.1950.2080.300

[back to top]

Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in Body Mass Index (BMI; in Kilograms Per Square Meter [kg/m^2])

BMI = Weight (kg)/(Height*Height) (square meters [m^2]). (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
Sirolimus0.53
Tacrolimus0.75

[back to top]

Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in Fasting Glucose (mmol/L)

(NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionmmol (Mean)
Sirolimus-0.50
Tacrolimus-0.23

[back to top]

Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in Fasting Insulin (Picomoles Per Liter [Pmol/L])

(NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionpmol/L (Mean)
Sirolimus27.25
Tacrolimus17.14

[back to top]

Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in Hemoglobin A1C (Liter Per Liter [L/L])

Ratio of hemoglobin A1c to normal hemoglobin. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

InterventionL/L (Mean)
Sirolimus-0.00
Tacrolimus0.00

[back to top]

Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in HOMA-Beta Cell (HOMA-B; Fasting)

"The Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) estimates steady state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population.~HOMA-B = 20 * insulin (µU/L) / fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) minus (-) 3.5 Participants taking insulin within 12 hours were excluded from the analysis." (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionpercentage beta cell function (Mean)
Sirolimus230.23
Tacrolimus26.05

[back to top]

Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR; Fasting)

"The HOMA-IR measures insulin resistance based on fasting glucose and insulin measurements:~HOMA-IR = fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) multiplied by (*) fasting plasma insulin in microunits per liter (µU/L) divided by (/) 22.5.~Participants taking insulin within 12 hours were excluded from the analysis." (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventioninsulin resistance score (Mean)
Sirolimus1.14
Tacrolimus1.10

[back to top]

Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in Waist Circumference(Centimeters [cm])

(NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventioncm (Mean)
Sirolimus1.13
Tacrolimus2.21

[back to top]

Change From Pre-Randomization to 12 Months Post-Transplantation in Weight (Kilograms [kg])

(NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionkg (Mean)
Sirolimus1.61
Tacrolimus2.03

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-Confirmed Acute Rejection (BCAR), Graft Loss, or Death From Randomization to 24 Months Post-Transplantation

Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was defined according to updated Banff criteria (2007) for renal allograft rejection. Graft loss was defined as physical loss (nephrectomy or retransplantation), functional loss (requiring dialysis for greater than or equal to [≥]56 days with no return of graft function), or death. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Post-randomization to Month 24 post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sirolimus11.5
Tacrolimus2.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection

Includes adverse event terms reported by the investigator to be attributed to the organism 'cytomegalovirus', regardless of the preferred term in MedDRA. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 24 months after transplantation (On-Therapy)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sirolimus3.1
Tacrolimus3.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement of ≥5 mL/Min/m^2 in Calculated GFR at 12 Months Post-Transplantation (On-Therapy Analysis)

GFR was calculated using the MDRD equation using either serum creatinine traceable to IDMS or serum creatinine not traceable to IDMS. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sirolimus39.4
Tacrolimus44.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement of Greater Than or Equal to [≥]5 Milliliters Per Minute Per 1.73 Square Meters (mL/Min/m^2) in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 24 Months Post-Transplantation (On-Therapy Analysis)

GFR was calculated using the Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation using either serum creatinine traceable to isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) or serum creatinine not traceable to IDMS. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sirolimus33.7
Tacrolimus42.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Infection

Includes adverse events based on categorization by the investigator as 'infection', regardless of the event preferred term in MedDRA. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 24 months after transplantation (On-Therapy)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sirolimus61.8
Tacrolimus52.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Malignancy

Includes any adverse events based on categorization by the investigator as 'malignancy', regardless of the event preferred term in MedDRA. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 24 months after transplantation (On-Therapy)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sirolimus3.1
Tacrolimus7.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Polyomavirus Infection

Includes adverse event terms reported by the investigator to be attributed to the organism 'polyomavirus', regardless of the preferred term in MedDRA. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 24 months after transplantation (On-Therapy)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sirolimus3.8
Tacrolimus7.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Stomatitis

Includes adverse events based on categorization by the investigator as stomatitis, regardless of the event preferred term in Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 24 months after transplantation (On-Therapy)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sirolimus28.2
Tacrolimus1.6

[back to top]

Slope of Calculated GFR (MDRD) From Randomization to 24 Months Post-Transplantation (On-Therapy Analysis)

GFR was calculated using the MDRD equation using either serum creatinine traceable to IDMS or serum creatinine not traceable to IDMS. Timepoints were calculated as study days, relative to the time of randomization of study medication. All available on-therapy values were included. Observed data were multiplied by a scale factor of 365, expressing the slope as an annual change. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 per year (Mean)
Sirolimus-0.9
Tacrolimus0.9

[back to top]

Calculated GFR Using MDRD (On-Therapy Analysis)

GFR was calculated using the MDRD equation using either serum creatinine traceable to IDMS or serum creatinine not traceable to IDMS. Baseline was defined as the last nonmissing assessment before or on the date of the first dose of test article. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18, and 24

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Baseline (n=131,123)Month 6 (n=125,120)Month 12 (n=109,116)Month 18 (n=99,111)Month 24 (n=86,109)
Sirolimus58.561.659.660.059.4
Tacrolimus57.457.661.359.858.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Pre-Randomization) to 12 and 24 Months Post-Transplantation in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L])

Parameters assessed included total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C); collected when participant was in a fasting state. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
TC, Change at Month 12 (n=96,107)TC, Change at Month 24 (n=74,88)HDL-C, Change at Month 12 (n=90,99)HDL-C, Change at Month 24 (n=69,81)LDL-C, Change at Month 12 (n=87,98)LDL-C, Change at Month 24 (n=66,78)Triglycerides, Change at Month 12 (n=94,104)Triglycerides, Change at Month 24 (n=73,86)
Sirolimus0.660.51-0.000.010.430.340.470.43
Tacrolimus-0.12-0.080.010.01-0.06-0.06-0.180.07

[back to top]

Change From Randomization in Calculated GFR Using MDRD (On-Therapy Analysis)

GFR was calculated using the MDRD equation using either serum creatinine traceable to IDMS or serum creatinine not traceable to IDMS. Baseline was defined as the last nonmissing assessment before or on the date of the first dose of test article. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18, and 24

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Month 6 (n=125,120)Month 12 (n=109,116)Month 18 (n=99,111)Month 24 (n=86,109)
Sirolimus2.71.52.21.2
Tacrolimus0.03.41.50.6

[back to top]

Change From Randomization in Serum Creatinine (On-Therapy Analysis)

Serum creatinine was measured in mcmol/L. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first administration of study drug. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18, and 24

,
Interventionmcmol/L (Mean)
Month 6 (n=125,120)Month 12 (n=109,116)Month 18 (n=99,111)Month 24 (n=86,109)
Sirolimus-4.1-0.3-3.03.2
Tacrolimus-0.0-7.0-1.90.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With BCAR by Severity of First BCAR and Time of Onset From Post-Randomization to 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post-Transplant

BCAR was categorized as antibody-mediated (AM) or T-cell. AM BCAR severity was graded as Grade I (mild), Grade II (moderate), and Grade III (severe). T-cell BCAR severity was graded as 'Grade Ia, Ib (mild), Grade IIa, IIb (moderate), and Grade III (severe). If a participant had both T-cell BCAR and antibody-mediated BCAR on the first rejection, the participant was counted in each category. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Months 6, 12, 18, and 24

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 6, AM Grade IMonth 6, AM Grade IIMonth 6, AM Grade IIIMonth 6, T-cell Grade Ia, IbMonth 6, T-cell Grade IIa, IIbMonth 6, T-cell Grade IIIMonth 12, AM Grade IMonth 12, AM Grade IIMonth 12, AM Grade IIIMonth 12, T-cell Grade Ia, IbMonth 12, T-cell Grade IIa, IIbMonth 12, T-cell Grade IIIMonth 18, AM Grade IMonth 18, AM Grade IIMonth 18, AM Grade IIIMonth 18, T-cell Grade Ia, IbMonth 18, T-cell Grade IIa, IIbMonth 18, T-cell Grade IIIMonth 24, AM Grade IMonth 24, AM Grade IIMonth 24, AM Grade IIIMonth 24, T-cell Grade Ia, IbMonth 24, T-cell Grade IIa, IIbMonth 24, T-cell Grade III
Sirolimus000200101510101710211810
Tacrolimus000000000010100110100110

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Requiring Anti-Hypertensive Medication, Diabetes Agents, Lipid-Lowering Agents, or Erythropoiesis Stimuating Agents (ESAs)

(NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline, Anti-hypertensivesMonth 12, Anti-hypertensivesMonth 24, Anti-hypertensivesBaseline, Diabetes agents (insulin)Month 12, Diabetes agents (insulin)Month 24, Diabetes agents (insulin)Baseline, Diabetes agents (non-insulin)Month 12, Diabetes agents (non-insulin)Month 24, Diabetes agents (non-insulin)Baseline, Lipid-lowering agentsMonth 12, Lipid-lowering agentsMonth 24, Lipid-lowering agentsBaseline, ESAsMonth 12, ESAsMonth 24, ESAs
Sirolimus95.475.661.846.626.018.314.510.79.246.655.747.350.47.63.8
Tacrolimus92.769.965.947.226.025.217.913.813.060.254.549.643.12.42.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Requiring Treatment for Stomatitis by Treatment Type

Included treatments (analgesics, dental paste, topical antifungal, topical steroids, or other) prior to randomization, during the on-therapy period (up to 19 to 21 months post-randomization) and the off-therapy period (up to 24 months post-transplantation). (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: On-Therapy Period (up to 21 months post-randomization) and Off-Therapy Period (up to 24 months post-transplantation)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
On-Therapy Period, any treatmentOff-Therapy Period, any treatmentOn-Therapy, analgesicsOn-Therapy, dental pasteOn-Therapy, topical steroidsOn-Therapy, otherOff-Therapy, topical steroidsOff-Therapy, other
Sirolimus17.63.10.83.85.310.71.51.5
Tacrolimus2.41.60.00.80.02.40.01.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Anemia, Thrombocytopenia, or Leukopenia

Anemia was defined as hemoglobin less than or equal to (≤)10 grams per deciliter (g/dL); leukopenia was defined as white blood cell (WBC) count ≤2000 per cubic millimeters (/mm^3); and thrombocytopenia was defined as platelets ≤100,000/mm^3. Baseline was defined as the last nonmissing assessment before or on the date of the first dose of test article. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline (n=131,122)Month 12 (n=110,116)Month 24 (n=89,112)
Sirolimus4.69.13.4
Tacrolimus1.62.64.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI) or Angiotensin II Receptor Block (ARB) Use

Included ACEI or ARB use prior to randomization, during the on-therapy period (up to 19 to 21 months post randomization) and the off-therapy period (up to 24 months post-transplantation). (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Pre-randomization, On-Therapy Period (up to 21 months post-randomization), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 24 months post-transplantation)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-randomizationOn-Therapy PeriodOff-Therapy Period
Sirolimus46.643.532.1
Tacrolimus46.329.318.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Antibody Use in Treatment of Acute Rejection

Number of participants who experienced an adverse event (AE) of rejection was used as the denominator in the determination of percentage of participants with antibody use in treatment of acute rejection. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: On Therapy Period (up to 21 months post-randomization) and Off-Therapy Period (up to 24 months post-transplantation)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
On-therapy PeriodOff-therapy Period
Sirolimus60.040.0
Tacrolimus75.025.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With BCAR Post-Randomization to 6, 12, 18, and 24 Months Post-Transplantation

BCAR was defined according to updated Banff criteria (2007) for renal allograft rejection. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Post-Randomization to 6, 12, 18, and 24 months Post-Transplantation

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6Month 12Month 18Month 24
Sirolimus1.55.36.98.4
Tacrolimus0.00.81.61.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With First On-Therapy BCAR From Transplantation Occurring at 12 and 24 Months

Defined as the first BCAR occurring during the On-Therapy period based on the ITT population. Time to first BCAR was the days from transplantation to the date of BCAR. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Months 12 and 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 12Month 24
Sirolimus5.19.3
Tacrolimus0.00.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss (Including Death) at 12 and 24 Months Post-Randomization

Graft loss was defined as physical loss (nephrectomy or retransplantation), functional loss (requiring dialysis for ≥56 days with no return of graft function), or death. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Post-randomization to Months 12 and 24 Post-Transplantation

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 12Month 24
Sirolimus0.83.8
Tacrolimus0.00.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement of ≥10 mL/Min/m^2 in Calculated GFR at 12 and 24 Months Post-Transplantation

GFR was calculated using the MDRD equation using either serum creatinine traceable to IDMS or serum creatinine not traceable to IDMS. (NCT00895583)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 12Month 24
Sirolimus19.822.1
Tacrolimus23.622.0

[back to top]

Either Equivalent or Improved Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at One Year in the Rapamycin Group

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. (NCT00896012)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

,
InterventionmL/min (Mean)
eGFR at 1 MontheGFR at 3 MonthseGRF at 6 MonthseGRF at 12 Months
1. Low-dose Tacrolimus Arm65.568.67574
2. Rapamune Conversion Arm:58.358.76766

[back to top]

Improved Histology at 12 Months in the Rapamycin Group

Chronic allograft damage index (CADI) scores. It's a sum score of six histo- pathological lesions commonly seen in biopsies taken from transplanted kidneys that correlate with the function and outcome of the graft. The maximum CADI score can go up to 18. In this case the lesions found were Interstitial fibrosis (IF) and Tubular Atrophy (TA) subscales from 0 (min) to 5 (max) . A score of 0 to 1 means absence of chronic allograft damage, a score of 4 is severe damage. . (NCT00896012)
Timeframe: 3 and 12 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
CADI Score at 3-Month Randomization Follow-UpCADI Score at 12-Month Randomization Follow-up
1. Low-dose Tacrolimus Arm1.12.8
2. Rapamune Conversion Arm:1.02.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Graft Survival at 12 Months

Graft survival is defined as no rejection or inflammation at 12 months. (NCT00896012)
Timeframe: Number of participants biopsied at 12 months post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1. Low-dose Tacrolimus Arm18
2. Rapamune Conversion Arm:12

[back to top]

Renal Function in Patients Converted From Cyclosporine to Prograf

(NCT00905515)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionChange in serum creatinine (mg/dL) (Mean)
Remaining on CsA0.05
Reduced TAC0
Standard TAC0.10

[back to top]

Optimal Dose of Calcineurin Inhibitor in Long-term Maintenance Kidney Transplant Patients

(NCT00905515)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Remaining on CsA130.2
Reduced TAC5.24
Standard TAC6.90

[back to top]

Change in Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Morbidity and Chronic Graft Dysfunction as Evidenced by Blood Levels of Homocysteine

(NCT00905515)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionng/dL (Median)
Remaining on CsA4.75
Reduced TAC4.72
Standard TAC4.89

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Chronic GVHD

Chronic GVHD measured by meeting NIH criteria and treated with immune suppression (NCT00914940)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Chronic GVHD that meets NIH criteriaNo documented chronic GVHD
Overall Study Participants335

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Did Not Engraft After Receiving a CD45RA+ T Cell Depleted PBSC Transplant

Graft failure is defined as either a failure to reach an ANC of >500/uL for 3 consecutive days by day 28 post-transplant, or an irreversible decrease in ANC <100 after an established donor graft, unless there is a reasonable explanation such as a viral infection or drug effect that may be responsible for a reversible decrease in ANC. (NCT00914940)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Overall Study Participants0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Have Relapsed Within 5 Years of CD45RA+ T Cell Depleted PBSC Transplant

Relapse is defined by the presence of malignant cells in marrow, peripheral blood, or extramedullary sites by histopathology. Testing for recurrent malignancy in the blood and bone marrow performed by monitoring the CBC and bone marrow at Day 28, 58, 80, 360, and as needed for suspected relapse. (NCT00914940)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Overall Study Participants10

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Infections

Number of participants with clinically significant infections (bacterial, fungal, viral) requiring treatment within 100 days following transplant (NCT00919503)
Timeframe: 100 days post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Regimen A (PBSCT and BMT)57
Regimen B (UBCT)9

[back to top]

Donor Chimerism CD33 at Day 100 Post Transplant

Number of patients with peripheral blood donor chimerism for CD33 less than 5%, 5-49%, 50-94% and greater than or equal to 95% at 100 days post transplant. (NCT00919503)
Timeframe: 100 days post transplant

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Greater than equal to 95%50-94%5-49%Less than 5%
Regimen A (PBSCT and BMT)72840
Regimen B (UBCT)7221

[back to top]

Donor Chimerism CD3 at 100 Days Post Transplant

Number of patients with peripheral blood donor chimerism for CD3 less than 5%, 5-49%, 50-94% and greater than or equal to 95% at 100 days post transplant. (NCT00919503)
Timeframe: Day 100 post transplant

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Greater than equal to 95%50 - 94%5-49%Less than 5%
Regimen A (PBSCT and BMT)492960
Regimen B (UBCT)7211

[back to top]

Preliminary Efficacy

Number of patients engrafted (>5% donor CD3+ peripheral blood chimerisms) at 1 year following transplant (NCT00919503)
Timeframe: 1 year following transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Regimen A (PBSCT and BMT)83
Regimen B (UBCT)10

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Number of patients alive at 1 year following transplant (NCT00919503)
Timeframe: 1 year following transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Regimen A (PBSCT and BMT)80
Regimen B (UBCT)9

[back to top]

Number of Patients With of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease

Number of patients diagnosed with chronic GVHD and requiring systemic immunosuppression within 1 year following transplant (NCT00919503)
Timeframe: 1 year following transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Regimen A (PBSCT and BMT)29
Regimen B (UBCT)5

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Grade II-IV Acute Graft-versus-host Disease

Number of patients diagnosed with overall grade II-IV acute GVHD by Day 100 post transplant (NCT00919503)
Timeframe: Day 100 post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Regimen A (PBSCT and BMT)44
Regimen B (UBCT)8

[back to top]

Non-relapse Mortality

Number of patients who experienced non-relapse mortality by 1 year following transplant (NCT00919503)
Timeframe: 1 year following transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Regimen A (PBSCT and BMT)2
Regimen B (UBCT)5

[back to top]

Immune Reconstitution Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Number of patients with immune reconstitution (defined by a normal range CD3) at 1 year post transplant (NCT00919503)
Timeframe: 1 year following transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Regimen A (PBSCT and BMT)39
Regimen B (UBCT)4

[back to top]

Disease Response at One Year Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Number of patients with no evidence of disease at one year following transplant (NCT00919503)
Timeframe: 1 year following transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Regimen A (PBSCT and BMT)78
Regimen B (UBCT)8

[back to top]

To Compare 2-year Overall Survival of Patients With Lymphoma Undergoing RIC SCT Between Those Receiving Tacrolimus/Sirolimus/Methotrexate and Those Receiving Tacrolimus/Methotrexate or Cyclosporine/Mycophenolate Mofetil

(NCT00928018)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sirolimus-Containing Regimen70
Sirolimus-Free Regimen68

[back to top]

To Compare the 2-year Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD Between the Two Treatment Arms.

(NCT00928018)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sirolimus-Containing Regimen59
Sirolimus-Free Regimen63

[back to top]

To Compare the 180-day Cumulative Incidence of Grades II-IV and Grades III-IV Acute GVHD Between the Two Treatment Arms

(NCT00928018)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade II-IV aGVHDGrade III-IV aGVHD
Sirolimus-Containing Regimen93
Sirolimus-Free Regimen254

[back to top]

To Compare the 2-year of Overall Survival, Progression-free Survival, Cumulative Incidences of Progression and Non-relapse Mortality Between the Treatment Arms for Each Histology Studied.

(NCT00928018)
Timeframe: 2 years

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Overall SurvivalProgression Free SurvivalCumulative Incidence of ProgressionNon-relapse mortality
Aggressive Group: Sirolimus-Containing Regimen54463221
Aggressive Group: Sirolimus-Free Regimen7664279
Indolent Group: Sirolimus-Containing Regimen8271218
Indolent Group: Sirolimus-Free Regimen63533315

[back to top]

To Compare the 2-year Cumulative Incidences of Disease Progression and of Non-relapse Mortality Between the Two Treatment Arms

(NCT00928018)
Timeframe: 2 years

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cumulative incidence of relapse/progressionNon-relapse mortality
Sirolimus-Containing Regimen2614
Sirolimus-Free Regimen3012

[back to top]

To Compare 2-year Progression-free Survival Between the Two Treatment Arms

(NCT00928018)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sirolimus-Containing Regimen61
Sirolimus-Free Regimen58

[back to top]

The Composite Endpoint of Reduction of e eGFR at One Year by More Than 15% & the Progression in Fibrosis Score at One Year by >=20% Compared With the Baseline Values

(NCT00931255)
Timeframe: One year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus6
Sirolimus9

[back to top]

Incidence of BK Nephropathy (Cumulative)

(NCT00931255)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus1
Sirolimus0

[back to top]

Graft Survival (Actual, Actuarial)

(NCT00931255)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus16
Sirolimus14

[back to top]

eGFR

(NCT00931255)
Timeframe: One year

InterventionmL/min per 1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Tacrolimus56.4
Sirolimus53.7

[back to top]

Change in Inflammatory Marker, MCP, From Baseline

(NCT00931255)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Tacrolimus-787.5
Sirolimus-965.2

[back to top]

Change in Inflammatory Marker, IL-6 From Baseline

(NCT00931255)
Timeframe: 1 Year

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Tacrolimus-0.7
Sirolimus6.2

[back to top]

Change in eGFR From Baseline to 1-year

(NCT00931255)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionmL/min per 1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Tacrolimus7.45
Sirolimus1.57

[back to top]

Incidence of Acute Rejection (Actual, Actuarial)

(NCT00931255)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus1
Sirolimus1

[back to top]

Change in Inflammatory Marker : CRP From Baseline

(NCT00931255)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Tacrolimus-1668
Sirolimus4510

[back to top]

Number of Participants of True Non-responder Rate

Defined as failure to achieve at least a 2 log reduction of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA. The HCV RNA detection limit was <15 IU/ml (<1.18 log IU/ml) (NCT00938860)
Timeframe: Week 80

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Neoral7
Tacrolimus5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Fibrosis Progression (Increase in Ishak-Knodell (IK) Score by at Least One Point From the Baseline)

Ishak-Knodell Score: 0=No fibrosis; 01=Fibrous expansion of some portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa; 02=Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa; 03=Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with occasional portal to portal (P-P) bridging; 04=Fibrous expansion of portal areas, with marked bridging (portal to portal (P-P) as well as portal to central (P-C)); 05=Marked bridging (P-P and/or P-C) with occasional nodules (incomplete cirrhosis); 06=Cirrhosis, probable or definite, Participants showing an increase of Ishak Knodell fibrosis score by at least one level (increase of ≥1) (NCT00938860)
Timeframe: Week 80

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Neoral3
Tacrolimus5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Sustained Virological Response (SVR) Following Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection With Peg-IFN and Ribavirin in Liver Transplanted Recipients on Maintenance Therapy With Neoral or Tacrolimus

The achievement of SVR, defined as HCV RNA below limit of detection at the end of AV treatment, 24 weeks after end of AV treatment (W24 post). A dichotomous variable (SVR achieved: Yes/No) was computed. A patient was classified as non-responder (SVR not achieved) if HCV RNA was detectable at the completion of antiviral treatment, at W24post, or at any time between W24 and completion of antiviral treatment. The HCV RNA detection limit was <15 IU/ml (<1.18 log IU/ml) (NCT00938860)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Neoral12
Tacrolimus10

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Reduction or Discontinuation of Antiviral (AV) Therapy Due to Poor Tolerability at Any Time During the Study for Any Reason

Defined as number of patients with dose reduction or discontinuation of AV therapy due to poor tolerability (NCT00938860)
Timeframe: Week 80

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Neoral Antiviral treatment: RibavirinNeoral Antiviral treatment: Peg-IFNTacrolimus Antiviral treatment: RibavirinTacrolimus Antiviral treatment: Peg-IFN
Neoral251000
Tacrolimus002311

[back to top]

Number of Participants for Relapse Rate

Defined as reappearance of detectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA at 24 weeks after completion of antiviral treatment when HCV RNA was undetectable at the end of treatment. The HCV RNA detection limit was <15 IU/ml (<1.18 log IU/ml) (NCT00938860)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Neoral5
Tacrolimus7

[back to top]

Number of Participants for the End of Treatment Response (ETR)

ETR defined as non-detectable HCV RNA at the completion of AV treatment. The HCV RNA detection limit was <15 IU/ml (<1.18 log IU/ml) (NCT00938860)
Timeframe: Week 80

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Neoral24
Tacrolimus27

[back to top]

Number of Participants of Early Viral Response (EVR)

EVR defined as non-detectable HCV RNA or a ≥2 logs reduction of HCV RNA at 12 weeks after initiation of antiviral treatment. The HCV RNA detection limit was <15 IU/ml (<1.18 log IU/ml) (NCT00938860)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Neoral28
Tacrolimus30

[back to top]

Number of Participants of Rapid Viral Response (RVR)

RVR defined as non-detectable HCV RNA 4 weeks after initiation of antiviral treatment. The HCV RNA detection limit was <15 IU/ml (<1.18 log IU/ml) (NCT00938860)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Neoral4
Tacrolimus5

[back to top]

Number of Events of the Composite Endpoint of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejections (BPAR), Death or Graft Loss and of the Individual Components

Efficacy failure (biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, or death (NCT00938860)
Timeframe: Week 80

,
InterventionNumber of events (Number)
BPAR, graft loss, or deathBPARGraft loss or deathDeath
Neoral2111
Tacrolimus1011

[back to top]

Incidence of Chronic GVHD

Percentage of participants who experienced chronic GVHD. Chronic GVHD is graded using NIH consensus criteria and Seattle criteria. (NCT00946023)
Timeframe: 1 year post intervention

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Transplant11

[back to top]

Incidence of Grades III-IV Acute GVHD

Percentage of participants who experienced grade II, III, or IV acute GVHD. Acute GVHD is graded using the Przepiorka criteria. (NCT00946023)
Timeframe: 1 year post intervention

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Transplant5

[back to top]

Non-relapse Mortality

Percentage of participants who died due to BMT-related reasons. (NCT00946023)
Timeframe: 1 year post intervention

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Transplant8

[back to top]

Engraftment

Percentage of patients who engrafted neutrophils and platelets. (NCT00946023)
Timeframe: Day 60

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Neutrophil engraftmentPlatelet engraftment
Transplant9898

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Percentage of participants alive. (NCT00946023)
Timeframe: 2 years post intervention

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
All participantsHaploidentical recipientsVV donorVF donorFF donor
Transplant7673877669

[back to top]

Relapse

Percentage of participants alive with relapse or disease progression. (NCT00946023)
Timeframe: 1 year post intervention

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
All participantsHaploidentical recipientsVV donorVF donorFF donor
Transplant2020182317

[back to top]

Relapse

Percentage of participants alive with relapse or disease progression. (NCT00946023)
Timeframe: 2 years post intervention

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
All participantsHaploidentical recipientsVV donorVF donorFF donor
Transplant2723253122

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Percentage of participants alive and without relapse or disease progression. (NCT00946023)
Timeframe: 1 year post-intervention

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
All participantsHaploidentical recipientsVV donorVF donorFF donor
Transplant7170827065

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Percentage of participants alive. (NCT00946023)
Timeframe: 1 year post intervention

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
All participantsHaploidentical recipientsVV donorVF donorFF donor
Transplant8683948678

[back to top]

Graft Failure

Percentage of participants who failed to engraft. (NCT00946023)
Timeframe: Day 60

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Transplant2

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Percentage of participants alive with and without relapse. (NCT00946023)
Timeframe: 2 years post-intervention

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
All participantsHaploidentical recipientsVV donorVF donorFF donor
Transplant6063685956

[back to top]

Incidence of Grades II-IV Acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease (GVHD)

Percentage of participants who experienced grade II, III, or IV acute GVHD. Acute GVHD is graded using the Przepiorka criteria. (NCT00946023)
Timeframe: 1 year post intervention

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Transplant41

[back to top]

Participants Who Had Occurrence of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection, Graft Loss or Death.

Biopsy-proven acute rejection was defined as a biopsy gradeed IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III. The allograft was presumed to be lost if the patient started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis. If the patient underwent a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was the day of graft loss. (NCT00965094)
Timeframe: 9 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
NoYes
Everolimus141
Reference Therapy141

[back to top]

Renal Function Assessed as Glomerula Filtration Rate (GFR) - Nankivell Method - 9 Months After Renal Transplantation (LOCF)

The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the best clinical estimate of renal function in health and disease, and correlates well with the clinical severity of renal function disturbances. The GFR, calculated according to the Nankivell formula, was used as the primary outcome measure in this study. This equation has been validated in renal transplant patients against the true GFR measured by a radionuclide method and has been confirmed as a very accurate method to calculate the GFR in this specific population (Gaspari et al., 2004)GFR = 6.7 / Scr + BW / 4 - Surea / 2-100 / (height)² + C Scr = serum creatinine concentration expressed in mmol/L. BW = body weight in kg, Surea = serum urea in mmol/L and Height is expressed in meters.The Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) imputation technique was used for this analysis. (NCT00965094)
Timeframe: 9 months

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Everolimus15.0
Reference Therapy16.6

[back to top]

Change in Renal Function (Creatinine Slope)

X(slope)=(1/value of creatinine). (NCT00965094)
Timeframe: 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months

,
Interventionmg/dl per month (Mean)
(ITT) Baseline 2: Month 3 N=15, 15(ITT) Month 3 (1st week) N=15, 4(ITT) Month 3 (2nd week) N=15, 4(ITT) Month 3 (3rd week) N=13, 2(ITT) Month 3 (4th week) N=12, 0*(ITT) Month 5 N=14, 15(ITT) Month 7 N=14, 14(ITT) Month 9 N=11, 15(PP) Baseline 2: Month 3 N=11, 15(PP) Month 3 (first week) N=11, 4(PP) Month 3 (second week) N=11, 4(PP) Month 3 (third week) N=10, 2(PP) Month 3 (fourth week) N=9, 0*(PP) Month 5 N=11, 15(PP) Month 7 N=11, 14(PP) Month 9 N=11, 15
Everolimus0.70.70.80.70.80.80.70.80.70.70.80.70.80.80.80.8
Reference Therapy0.70.80.90.9NA0.70.70.80.70.80.90.9NA0.70.70.8

[back to top]

Participants Who Had Occurrence of Treatment Failure.

Treatment failure was defined as a composite endpoint of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, loss to follow up, discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or toxicity or conversion to another regimen. (NCT00965094)
Timeframe: 9 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
NoYes
Everolimus105
Reference Therapy141

[back to top]

Assessment of GFR by the Cockcroft-Gault Method (LOCF)

the GFR was also calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault method (Cockcroft and Gault 1976) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) method (Levey et al., 1999, Rodrigo et al., 2003; Pierrat et al., 2003).Cockcroft-Gault formula For men: GFR= (140-Age)X Body Weight[kg]/72X Serum Creatinine[mg/dl] For women: GFR= 0,85x(140-Age) x Body Weight[kg]/72x Serum Creatinine [mg/dl] The Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) imputation technique was used for this analysis. (NCT00965094)
Timeframe: 9 months

InterventionmL/min (Mean)
Everolimus72.6
Reference Therapy72.7

[back to top]

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at 12 Months Post-surgery

Postoperative acute kidney injury is measured as reduced (eGFR) within 12 months post-surgery. (NCT00970073)
Timeframe: 12 Months

InterventionmL/min (Median)
Delayed CNI Group 172
Delayed CNI Group 287.8
Early CNI / Control Arm51.0

[back to top]

Allograft Rejection Rates at 30 Days

Acute Allograft Rejection (NCT00970073)
Timeframe: 30 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Delayed CNI Group 13
Delayed CNI Group 21
Early CNI / Control Arm0

[back to top]

Patient Survival

(NCT00970073)
Timeframe: 12 months post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Delayed CNI Group 110
Delayed CNI Group 29
Early CNI / Control Arm8

[back to top]

Graft Survival

90% graft survival, related to the deaths of 3 patients during the study period. (NCT00970073)
Timeframe: 12 months post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Delayed CNI Group 110
Delayed CNI Group 29
Early CNI / Control Arm8

[back to top]

Number of Serious Adverse Events

(NCT00982072)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionserious adverse events (Number)
Prednisolone4
Tacrolimus3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Remission From Nephrotic Syndrome at 8 Weeks

normalisation of serum albumin and urine PCR <50 units (NCT00982072)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Prednisolone21
Tacrolimus17

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving Remission Who Then Relapse

(NCT00982072)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Prednisolone17
Tacrolimus16

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving Complete Remission From Nephrotic Syndrome at 16 and 26 Weeks

(NCT00982072)
Timeframe: 16 and 26 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
16 weeks26 weeks
Prednisolone2323
Tacrolimus1922

[back to top]

Lipidic Profile (HDL-c)

(NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal44.84
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization49.29
CsA With Steroid Minimization48.35

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Using Statins

(NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal56.
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization61.5
CsA With Steroid Minimization73.7

[back to top]

Lipidic Profile (Cholesterol)

Lipidic Profile (total cholesterol) (NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal169.05
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization178.24
CsA With Steroid Minimization168.89

[back to top]

Changes of Carotid Intima-media Thickness Over Time

absolute difference between carotid intima-media thickness at study end versus baseline. (NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionmm (Mean)
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal0.12
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization0.04
CsA With Steroid Minimization0.01

[back to top]

Number of Antihypertensive Drugs Patients Reported Taking.

(NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionnumber of antihypertensive drugs (Median)
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal2
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization2
CsA With Steroid Minimization2

[back to top]

Lipidic Profile (Triglycerides)

(NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal159.44
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization145.59
CsA With Steroid Minimization160.78

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Using Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA)

(NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal53.9
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization48.7
CsA With Steroid Minimization52.8

[back to top]

Rejection

Biopsy proven acute rejection. Measured variable: Rate of Biopsy proven acute rejection. (NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal11.4
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization4.8
CsA With Steroid Minimization21.4

[back to top]

Patients Treated With Insulin or Oral Antidiabetic Drugs

(NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal20
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization15.4
CsA With Steroid Minimization2.6

[back to top]

Lipidic Profile (LDL-c)

(NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal94.00
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization95.43
CsA With Steroid Minimization88.65

[back to top]

"Primary Outcome Measure New Onset Diabetes After Renal Transplantation (NODAT)"

American Diabetes Association criteria (ADA) including an oral glucose tolerance test. (NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
% of patients with NODAT% of patients without NODAT
CsA With Steroid Minimization7.992.1
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal34.165.9
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization23.176.9

[back to top]

Renal Function

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (ml/min/1.73 m^2) (NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionml/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal51.9
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization47.4
CsA With Steroid Minimization44.6

[back to top]

Primary Outcome Measure (Glucose Intolerance)

Glycemia >=140 and <200 mg/dl, 2 hours after a standard oral glucose tolerance test. Measured values: glucose intolerance at 1 year defined by ADA criteria. (NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal26.9
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization31.0
CsA With Steroid Minimization33.3

[back to top]

Proteinuria

(NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionmg/day (Mean)
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal208
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization241
CsA With Steroid Minimization343.2

[back to top]

Blood Pressure

Diastolic pressure (mmHg) (NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal76.67
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization74.59
CsA With Steroid Minimization76.64

[back to top]

Blood Pressure

Systolic pressure (mmHg) (NCT01002339)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Tacrolimus With Rapid Steroid Withdrawal135.36
Tacrolimus With Steroids Minimization133.97
CsA With Steroid Minimization136.28

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With the Presence of Anti-MICA Antibodies by Luminex TM Assay

Major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related gene A (MICA) is an antigen that is a potential marker of rejection. Luminex TM assay was used to detect its presence. (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Pre-Transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A: Non-Sensitized8.2
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Positive18.8
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Negative11.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants- Mortality While on Transplantation Wait-List

Death that occurred while on the transplantation wait-list, and thus before receiving a heart transplant. (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Pre-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Enrolled, Not Transplanted39.2

[back to top]

Presence of C4d on Endomyocardial Biopsy (EMB)

The biopsy of the heart stained positive for the presence of C4d, a potential marker of rejection. (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Transplantation to the end of study (up to 4 years post transplant).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A: Non-Sensitized18.6
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Positive62.5
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Negative34.6

[back to top]

Time From Participant Listing on Organ Wait-List to Receiving Organ Transplant, Death or De-Listing

Time (in days) from listing on the organ wait-list to receiving an organ transplant, death or de-listing. This measure is calculated as time from listing on the organ wait-list until the earliest time among transplantation, death and de-listing. (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Study enrollment to transplantation

InterventionDays (Mean)
Enrolled128.3

[back to top]

Time to Acute Rejection

Time (in days) to acute rejection. Acute rejection is defined as any one of the following types of rejection: acute cellular rejection (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplant (ISHLT) system for grading rejection grade 2R or greater), acute refractory cellular rejection (acute cellular rejection unresponsive to two sequential courses of corticosteroids), acute antibody mediated rejection (histological evidence of unequivocal acute capillary injury, with complement deposition and margination of macrophages with or without neutrophils), acute mixed rejection (evidence of acute antibody mediated rejection with ISHLT grade 1R or greater), or acute clinical rejection (clinically-based acute rejection, no matter the ISHLT grade, leading to an acute augmentation of immunosuppression). Time to acute rejection is time from transplantation to first acute rejection date. (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Transplantation to the end of study.

InterventionDays (Mean)
Cohort A: Non-Sensitized151.0
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Positive74.5
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Negative124.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants -Overall Participant and Graft Survival

This measure looks at the participants who did not die and/or did not receive a subsequent heart transplant. (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Transplantation to the end of study (up to 4 years post transplant).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A: Non-Sensitized93.8
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Positive93.8
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Negative87.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Acute Rejection

Acute rejection is defined as any one of the following types of rejection: acute cellular rejection (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplant (ISHLT)) system for grading rejection grade 2R or greater), acute refractory cellular rejection (acute cellular rejection unresponsive to two sequential courses of corticosteroids), acute antibody mediated rejection (histological evidence of unequivocal acute capillary injury, with complement deposition and margination of macrophages with or without neutrophils), acute mixed rejection (evidence of acute antibody mediated rejection with ISHLT grade 1R or greater), or acute clinical rejection (clinically-based acute rejection, no matter the ISHLT grade, leading to an acute augmentation of immunosuppression). (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Transplantation to the end of study.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A: Non-Sensitized27.8
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Positive75.0
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Negative49.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With the Presence of Anti-HLA IgG Antibodies by Luminex SA Testing

Luminex SA testing was used to detect the presence of anti-HLA IgG Antibodies for all samples at a central laboratory. (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Pre-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A: Non-Sensitized22.7
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Positive81.3
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Negative68.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Positive for de Novo Donor-Specific Alloantibody Production in the First Year Post-Transplantation

A de novo donor-specific alloantibody (DSA) is a newly developed alloantibody that is against the donor organ. This measure includes all de novo DSA (≥1000 MFI) regardless of is persistence or timing within the first year post-transplant. Alloantibodies are important mediators of acute and chronic rejection. (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Transplantation to first year post transplant (up to 12 months post transplant).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A: Non-Sensitized22.7
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Positive50.0
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Negative37.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Positive for Event of Death, Graft Loss or Rejection With Hemodynamic Compromise at 12 Months Post-Transplantation

"This is a composite outcome of death, graft loss or rejection with hemodynamic compromise.~Rejection was considered to be with hemodynamic compromise if the rejection event had new onset echocardiographically measured from fractional shortening <26% with ≥5% fall from last echocardiogram or the rejection event had new onset of heart failure." (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: 12 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A: Non-Sensitized5.2
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Positive12.5
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Negative11.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Positive for Severe Infection(s)

Severe infections are defined as a clinical illness considered likely infectious in origin that leads to hospitalization. (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Transplantation to the end of study (up to 4 years post transplant).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A: Non-Sensitized34.0
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Positive43.8
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Negative30.7

[back to top]

Time to Production of Post-Transplant de Novo Donor-specific Alloantibodies

Time (in days) from transplant to development of de novo donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA). This measure is calculated as time from transplant until the earliest time of development of any de novo DSA. The DSA is a newly developed alloantibody that is against the donor organ. Alloantibodies are important mediators of acute and chronic rejection. (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Transplantation to first year post transplant (up to 12 months post transplant).

InterventionDays (Mean)
Cohort A: Non-Sensitized28.1
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Positive15.4
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Negative55.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Occurrence of Re-Hospitalization(s)

Hospitalization is defined as any hospitalization lasting greater than 24 hours. (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Transplantation to the end of study (up to 4 years post transplant).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A: Non-Sensitized66.0
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Positive75.0
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Negative62.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants -Quantification of Anti-HLA IgG Antibodies by Luminex SA Testing

Quantification of anti-HLA IgG antibodies is measured in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). The maximum MFI for the given subject is provided. (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Pre-transplantation

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
MissingNoneMFI 1000-3999MFI 4000-7999MFI ≥8000
Cohort A: Non-Sensitized077.320.61.01.0
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Negative2.429.129.914.224.4
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Positive018.86.312.562.5

[back to top]

Time to Diagnosis of Chronic Rejection

Time (in days) to the diagnosis of chronic rejection. Chronic rejection is defined as stenosis, irregularity, or ectasia of the epicardial vessels, or severe peripheral pruning of the distal coronary artery tree. Time to diagnosis is time from transplantation until the first diagnosis of chronic rejection. (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Transplantation to the end of study (up to 4 years post transplant).

InterventionDays (Mean)
Cohort A: Non-Sensitized606.8
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch PositiveNA
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Negative398.9

[back to top]

Time to New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus

Time (in days) to new-onset diabetes mellitus. New-onset diabetes mellitus is defined as the new onset of insulin dependency or the need for oral hypoglycemic agents lasting more than 30 days post-transplant. Time to new-onset diabetes is time from transplantation until the diagnosis of new-onset diabetes. (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Transplantation to the end of study (up to 4 years post transplant).

InterventionDays (Mean)
Cohort A: Non-Sensitized73
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Positive48
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Negative283.4

[back to top]

Time to Post-Transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorder

Time (in days) post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). PTLD is defined as histopathological evidence of lymphoid proliferation (nodal or extranodal) fulfilling the criteria of the revised classification of the WHO 2008 (Swerdlow 2008). Time to PTLD is time from transplantation until the diagnosis of PTLD. (NCT01005316)
Timeframe: Transplantation to the end of study (up to 4 years post transplant).

InterventionDays (Mean)
Cohort A: Non-Sensitized910
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch PositiveNA
Cohort B: Sensitized, Crossmatch Negative118.7

[back to top]

Effectiveness and Safety of a Particular Drug Regimen to Prevent Kidney Rejection

Number of Participants with Kidney Rejections (NCT01005706)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus Withdrawal Arm4
Tacrolimus Minimization Arm1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Grade II-IV Acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease and/or Chronic Extensive Graft-versus-Host-Disease

"aGVHD The diagnosis of aGVHD is identified through various stages and grading of the disease related to Skin (Rash), Gut (Diarrhea, Nausea/vomiting and/or anorexia) and the liver (Bilirubin) assessed by severity and grading scale outlined in the section Grafts vs Hosts by Sullivan (1999).~GVHD Grades Grade I: 1-2 Skin Rash; No gut or liver involvement Grade II: Stage 1-3 Skin rash; Stage 1 gut and/or stage 1 liver involvement Grade III: Stage 2-4 gut involvement and/or stage 2-4 liver involvement with or without rash Grade IV: Pattern and severity of GVHD similar to grade 3 with extreme constitutional symptoms or death~CGVHD The diagnosis of cGVHD requires at least one manifestation that is distinctive for chronic GVHD as opposed to acute GVHD. In all cases, infection and others causes must be ruled out in the differential diagnosis of chronic GVHD." (NCT01008462)
Timeframe: 1 year post-allograft,

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Acute Graft-versus-Host-DiseaseChronic extensive Graft-versus-Host-Disease
Treatment (Autologous HCT, Donor HCT)81

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Number of patients surviving one year post-autograft (NCT01008462)
Timeframe: 1 year post-autograft

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Autologous HCT, Donor HCT)10

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Relapsed/Progressive Disease

"Relapse/Progression defined as:~Nodes, liver, and/or spleen ≥50% increased or new by physical exam / imaging studies.~Circulating lymphocytes ≥50% increased by morphology and/or flow cytometry. Richter's transformation by lymph node biopsy ." (NCT01008462)
Timeframe: 1 year post-autograft

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Autologous HCT, Donor HCT)6

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Had Infections

Number of patients who had infections. (NCT01008462)
Timeframe: 1 Year post-autograft

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Autologous HCT, Donor HCT)16

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Engrafted

Number of patients with donor engraftment. (NCT01008462)
Timeframe: Day 84 post-allograft

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Autologous HCT, Donor HCT)13

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS)

Number of patients surviving without relapsed/progressive disease (NCT01008462)
Timeframe: 1 Year post-autograft

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Autologous HCT, Donor HCT)9

[back to top]

Non-relapse Mortality (NRM)

Number of patients with non-relapse mortalities. (NCT01008462)
Timeframe: 200 days and 1 Year post-allograft

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
200 days1 Year
Treatment (Autologous HCT, Donor HCT)01

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival

Participants who have survived without their original disease. (NCT01010217)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Haplo Arm50
1AgMM Related/Unrelated Donors24
MUD Donor12
Second Transplant0
Myelofibrosis0

[back to top]

Engraftments

(NCT01010217)
Timeframe: Day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Haplo Arm80
1AgMM Related/Unrelated Donors50
MUD Donor21
Second Transplant0
Myelofibrosis0

[back to top]

Grade III-IV aGVHD

Acute Graft vs host disease (NCT01010217)
Timeframe: 100 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Haplo Arm11
1AgMM Related/Unrelated Donors7
MUD Donor1
Second Transplant0
Myelofibrosis0

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Non-relapse Mortality (NRM)

Non-relapse mortality (NRM) is defined as death from any cause other than relapse disease. Bayesian monitoring scheme described in Thall, Simon, and Estey (1996) employed to perform interim monitoring of the data during the course of the trial separately within each group. (NCT01010217)
Timeframe: At 100 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Haplo Arm8
1AgMM Related/Unrelated Donors7
MUD Donor2
Second Transplant0
Myelofibrosis0

[back to top]

cGVHD

Chronic graft vs host disease (NCT01010217)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Haplo Arm11
1AgMM Related/Unrelated Donors7
MUD Donor0
Second Transplant0
Myelofibrosis0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Incidence of Composite Efficacy Failure

Efficacy failure rate used the composite endpoint of: (1) treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR)*, (2) graft loss**, (3) participant death or(4) loss to follow-up. *A treated BPAR was defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III and which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. **Graft loss is defined as when the allograft was presumed lost on the day the participant started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis. (NCT01025817)
Timeframe: 12 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Composite EndpointTreated Biopsy-proven Acute rejection (BPAR)Graft LossDeathLoss to follow up
Everolimus and Low Dose Tacrolimus7659469
Mycophenolate Mofetil and Standard Dose Tacrolimus623412517

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Incidence of CMV (Viremia, Syndrome and Disease)

Participants with incidence of CMV (viremia, syndrome and disease). CMV is cytomegalovirus. (NCT01025817)
Timeframe: 12 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
CMV syndrome eventLab evidence of CMV ViremiaCMV Disease
Everolimus and Low Dose Tacrolimus972
Mycophenolate Mofetil and Standard Dose Tacrolimus13108

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Incidence of Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Tacrolimus-associated Adverse Events

Incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, and tacrolimus-associated adverse events by System Organ Class (NCT01025817)
Timeframe: 12 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any system organ classMetabolism and nutrition disordersGastrointestinal disordersInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsGeneral disorders &administration site conditionsInfections and infestationsInvestigationsRenal and urinary disordersVascular disordersBlood and lymphatic system disordersNervous system disordersRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersPsychiatric disordersReproductive system and breast disordersCardiac disordersEye disordersImmune system disordersEndocrine disordersNeoplasms benign,malignant,other incl cysts/polypsEar and labyrinth disordersHepatobiliary disordersSurgical and medical proceduresCongenital, familial and genetic disordersSocial circumstances
Everolimus and Low Dose Tacrolimus3032662332231991841501411311301251221101099656512613121076200
Mycophenolate Mofetil and Standard Dose Tacrolimus30226324720217719614316012116315013411410810640473611815113061

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Incidence Rates of BKV Viremia, BKV Viruria, or BKV Nephropathy

Participants with Incidence of BKV (viremia, viruria, or nephropathy). BKV is Polyomavirus type BK. (NCT01025817)
Timeframe: 12 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Lab evidence of BKV ViremiaLab evidence of BKV ViruriaBKV Disease (Nephropathy)
Everolimus and Low Dose Tacrolimus19195
Mycophenolate Mofetil and Standard Dose Tacrolimus27155

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Incidence of Proteinuria Events

Number of participants with Incidence of proteinuria events indicating chronic kidney disease (NCT01025817)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline: Proteinuria (>=300 mg/g)Month 12, Day 316-450: Proteinuria (>=300 mg/g)
Everolimus and Low Dose Tacrolimus24336
Mycophenolate Mofetil and Standard Dose Tacrolimus25035

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Incidence of New Onset of Diabetes Mellitus

Incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus defined as non-diabetic patients before transplantation, who are receiving glucose lowering treatment for more than 30 days post-transplant, or with a random plasma glucose ≥200 mg dL (11.1 mmol/L) with 2 fasting plasma glucose values ≥126 mg/dL (7 mmol/L) (NCT01025817)
Timeframe: 12 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any New Onset DiabetesrandomGlucose≥200mg/dL w/2 fastingGlucose≥126mg/dLConcomitant Diabetes medicine for 30 days or more
Everolimus and Low Dose Tacrolimus251513
Mycophenolate Mofetil and Standard Dose Tacrolimus221214

[back to top]

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)

Renal function was assessed by estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. MDRD formula: GFR [mL/min/1.73m˄2] = 186.3*(C˄-1.154)*(A˄-0.203)*G*R. DEFINITIONS: C = serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL]; A = age [years]; G = 0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G = 1; R = 1.21 when race is black, otherwise R = 1 (NCT01025817)
Timeframe: 12 Months

InterventionmL/min/1.73m˄2 (Mean)
Everolimus and Low Dose Tacrolimus63.14
Mycophenolate Mofetil and Standard Dose Tacrolimus63.06

[back to top]

2-year Progression-free Survival in Early Disease Participants

"Percentage of participants who were alive and progression free at 2 years for participants with early disease stage. The 2 year progression free survival, with 95% confidence interval, was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method.~A progression is defined as one of the following events:~>= 50% increase in the products of at least two lymph nodes on two consecutive determinations two weeks apart (at least one lymph node must be >= 2 cm); appearance of new palpable lymph nodes.~>= 50% increase in the size of the liver and/or spleen as determined by measurement below the respective costal margin; appearance of palpable hepatomegaly or splenomegaly, which was not previously present.~> 50% increase in peripheral blood lymphocytes with an absolute increase > 5000/μL.~Transformation to a more aggressive histology (i.e., Richter's syndrome or prolymphocytic leukemia with >= 56% prolymphocytes)." (NCT01027000)
Timeframe: 2 years post-registration

Interventionpercentage of participants (Median)
Treatment (Combination of Chemotherapy and Transplant)79.5

[back to top]

Number of Platelet Transfusions

Number platelet transfusions given to the patient between day 0 and day 100 post transplant (NCT01028716)
Timeframe: Day 0-100

Interventiontransfusions (Median)
Treatment (Nonmyeloablative HCT, TBI)6

[back to top]

Point Estimate of Overall Survival at 3 Years

Kaplan Meier estimate of the percentage of participants with overall survival at 3 years (NCT01028716)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionpercent (Number)
Treatment (Nonmyeloablative HCT, TBI)45.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease

Scored according to the National Cancer Institute criteria. Mild-to-severe chronic GVHD at 2 years. (NCT01028716)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Nonmyeloablative HCT, TBI)26

[back to top]

Non-relapse Mortality at 1 Year

Cumulative incidence of death without evidence of disease progression at 1 year (NCT01028716)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Treatment (Nonmyeloablative HCT, TBI)22

[back to top]

Toxicity of Treatment Regimen Determined by Number of Adverse Events Per Organ System

Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. The incidence of all adverse events greater or equal to grade 3 was determined. (NCT01028716)
Timeframe: Up to day 90

Interventionevents (Number)
CardiacFeverRashGastrointestinalInfectionsCMV ReactivationFebrile NeutropeniaMetabolic/laboratoryMusculoskeletalNeurologicPainPulmonaryRenal/Genitourinary
Treatment (Nonmyeloablative HCT, TBI)139417552625243561010

[back to top]

Time to Platelet Recovery

The first day of a sustained platelet count > 20,000/mm^3 with no platelet transfusions in the preceding seven days. (NCT01028716)
Timeframe: Up to day 84 post-transplant

Interventiondays (Median)
Treatment (Nonmyeloablative HCT, TBI)23

[back to top]

Time to Neutrophil Recovery

Achievement of an absolute neutrophil count greater or equal to 500/mm^3 for three consecutive measurements on different days. The first of the three days will be designated the day of neutrophil recovery. (NCT01028716)
Timeframe: Up to day 84 post-transplant

Interventiondays (Median)
Treatment (Nonmyeloablative HCT, TBI)16

[back to top]

Relapse of Malignancy After Transplantation

Defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of acute leukemia consistent with pre-transplant features, or radiologic evidence of lymphoma progression. When in doubt, the diagnosis of recurrent or progressive lymphoma should be documented by tissue biopsy. (NCT01028716)
Timeframe: Up to 7 years

Interventionpercent (Number)
Treatment (Nonmyeloablative HCT, TBI)29

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival

Defined as being alive and in remission by < 5% blasts by bone marrow morphology for patients with myeloid malignancies and CT or PET imaging for patients with lymphoid malignancies at the time of the assessment (NCT01028716)
Timeframe: 3 years from the date of transplant

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Treatment (Nonmyeloablative HCT, TBI)40

[back to top]

Number of Red Blood Cell Transfusions

Number of units of RBCs given to the patient between day 0 and day 100 post transplant (NCT01028716)
Timeframe: Day 0-100

Interventiontransfusions (Median)
Treatment (Nonmyeloablative HCT, TBI)8

[back to top]

Incidence of Grades III/IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease

Grading determined by organ system stages. Grade III/IV acute graft versus host disease is defined as skin: stage IV, liver: stages II-IV, and/or gastrointestinal tract: stages II-IV. (NCT01028716)
Timeframe: At day 84

Interventionpercent (Number)
Treatment (Nonmyeloablative HCT, TBI)82

[back to top]

Incidence of Primary Graft Failure

Defined as < 5% donor CD3 chimerism. Chimerism will be measured by short tandem repeat-polymerase chain reaction on peripheral blood sorted into CD3 and CD33 cell fractions. (NCT01028716)
Timeframe: At day 84

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Nonmyeloablative HCT, TBI)0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimator. (NCT01044745)
Timeframe: From the date of transplant with death from any cause as a censored event, up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Rituximab and Allogeneic HCT Transplant)12

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grades II-IV Acute GVHD

Determined with death as a competing risk. Defined and staged using the 1994 consensus conference modifications of the Glucksberg criteria. (NCT01044745)
Timeframe: At day 100

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Rituximab and Allogeneic HCT Transplant)16

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimator. (NCT01044745)
Timeframe: From the date of transplant with relapse/progression or death as censored events, up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Rituximab and Allogeneic HCT Transplant)12

[back to top] [back to top]

Incidence of Success Based on the Investigator's Global Evaluation at the End of Treatment

(NCT01053247)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Test104
Reference121
Vehicle67

[back to top]

Phase II: The Minimization of Negative Side Effects - Patient Survival

The percentage of patients alive at 7 years post transplant or at the end of study activities. Not all participants completed 7-year follow-up. (NCT01062555)
Timeframe: up to 7 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II Arm 189
Phase II Arm 285

[back to top]

Phase II: The Minimization of Negative Side Effects - Graft Survival

The percentage of patients with a functioning graft (without graft failure) at 7 years post transplant or at the end of study activities. Not all participants completed 7-year follow-up. (NCT01062555)
Timeframe: up to 7 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II Arm 180
Phase II Arm 278

[back to top]

Phase I: Acute Rejection-Free Survival

Percent of participants at 6 months without acute rejection. (NCT01062555)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase I Arm 180
Phase I Arm 285

[back to top]

Phase I: The Minimization of Negative Side Effects - Graft Survival

Percent of participants at 6 months with a functioning graft (without graft failure). (NCT01062555)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase I Arm 199
Phase I Arm 299

[back to top]

Phase I: The Minimization of Negative Side Effects - Patient Survival

The percentage of patients alive at 6 month post transplant. (NCT01062555)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase I Arm 199
Phase I Arm 298

[back to top]

Phase II: Acute Rejection-Free Survival

The percentage of patients without acute rejection at 7 years post transplant or at the end of study activities. Not all participants completed 7-year follow-up. (NCT01062555)
Timeframe: up to 7 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II Arm 176
Phase II Arm 281

[back to top]

Incidence of Composite Efficacy Endpoint for Each Arm at Month 12 and Month 24

Efficacy failure rate used the composite endpoint of: (1) treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR)*, (2) graft loss**, or (3) death . *A treated BPAR was defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III and which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. **Graft loss is defined as when the allograft was presumed lost on the day the participant started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis or re-transplanted. (NCT01114529)
Timeframe: at 12 months and month 24 post-transplantation

,,
InterventionNumber of incidence (Number)
Month 12Month 24
Everolimus2127
Standard CNI (CsA)88
Standard CNI (Tac)48

[back to top]

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)

Assessment of renal function by comparing change from randomization to Month 12 in eGFR (MDRD4) between treatment arms (Full analysis set). Renal function was assessed by estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. MDRD formula: GFR [mL/min/1.73m˄2] = 186.3*(C˄-1.154)*(A˄-0.203)*G*R. DEFINITIONS: C = serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL]; A = age [years]; G = 0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G = 1; R = 1.21 when race is black, otherwise R = 1 (NCT01114529)
Timeframe: Month 12

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Everolimus64.1
Standard CNI (Tac)61.5
Standard CNI (CsA)58.4

[back to top]

Change in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMi) From Randomization to Month 12 and Month 24

Evolution of left ventricular mass and hypertrophy were evaluated by left ventricular mass index (LVMi) assessed by echocardiography. LVMi is derived using a standard formula from dimensional measurements on the echocardiogram. Analysis of covariance was applied with treatment, center (as a random effect), and donor type as factors and LVMi at Randomization as covariate. (NCT01114529)
Timeframe: Randomization, Month 12 and Month 24

,,
Interventiong/m^2.7 (Mean)
RandomizationMonth 12Month 24
Everolimus50.3049.9546.66
Standard CNI (CsA)51.1350.9647.91
Standard CNI (Tac)51.0848.9845.63

[back to top]

Comparison of Incidence Rates of Efficacy Endpoints Between Treatment Arms (Full Analysis Set - 24 Month Analysis)

(treated BPAR ≥ IB, graft loss or death)A comparison of the incidence rates for the individual components of the composite efficacy endpoint between treatment arms (NCT01114529)
Timeframe: at 24 months post-transplantation

,,
InterventionNumber of incidence (Number)
Composite failure: tBPAR>=IB, graft loss, deathComposite tBPAR>=IB, graft loss, death, loss f/uComposite of graft loss or DeathtBPAR>=IBGraft lossDeathSuspected Acute rejectionSubclinical Acute rejectionAcute rejection (AR)Treated Acute rejection (tAR)biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR)treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR)tBPAR=IAtBPAR=IBtBPAR=IIAtBPAR=IIBtBPAR=IIIAntibody tBPARAntibody mediated rejection (AMR)
Everolimus2735101848610524037321614320216
Standard CNI (CsA)8154524190151413138510013
Standard CNI (Tac)8146325270149873300014

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Cancer (at 18-months After Randomization to Maintenance Therapy)

Occurrence of any cancer reported during Period 2 (maintenance therapy randomization to either Sirolimus or Tacrolimus). (NCT01120028)
Timeframe: 2 years post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Period 2: Sirolimus17
Period 2: Tacrolimus17

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection at 6-months After Randomization to Induction Therapy

Occurence of biopsy-proven acute rejection events at 6-months after transplantation during Period 1 (randomization to induction therapy (Campath-1H and Tacrolimus, or Basiliximab and Tacrolimus)) (NCT01120028)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Period 1: Alemtuzumab/Tacrolimus31
Period 1: Basiliximab/Tacrolimus68

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Infection (at 18-months After Randomization to Maintenance Therapy)

Occurrence of any serious infection (opportunistic or requiring admission to hospital) reported during Period 2 (maintenance therapy randomization to either Sirolimus or Tacrolimus). (NCT01120028)
Timeframe: 2 years post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Period 2: Sirolimus95
Period 2: Tacrolimus70

[back to top]

Graft Function (at 18-months After Randomization to Maintenance Therapy)

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (estimated using MDRD formula) at 18-months after maintenance therapy randomization to either Sirolimus or Tacrolimus. (NCT01120028)
Timeframe: 2 years post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m² (Mean)
Period 2: Sirolimus53.7
Period 2: Tacrolimus54.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Infection (at 6-months After Randomization to Induction Therapy)

Occurrence of any serious infection (opportunistic or requiring admission to hospital) reported within Period 1 (randomization to induction therapy of either Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) and Tacrolimus, or Basiliximab and Tacrolimus). (NCT01120028)
Timeframe: 6-months post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Period 1: Campath 1H/Tacrolimus135
Period 1: Basiliximab/Tacrolimus136

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Major Vascular Event (at 18-months After Randomization to Maintenance Therapy)

Composite of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, cardiovascular death or arterial revascularization (NCT01120028)
Timeframe: 2 years post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Period 2: Sirolimus10
Period 2: Tacrolimus13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Graft Failure (at 6-months After Randomization to Induction Therapy)

Return to dialysis or re-transplantation by 6-months after randomization to induction therapy. (NCT01120028)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Period 1: Alemtuzumab/Tacrolimus16
Period 1: Basiliximab/Tacrolimus13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Graft Failure (at 18-Months After Randomization to Maintenance Therapy)

Return to dialysis or re-transplantation by 18-months after randomization to maintenance therapy. (NCT01120028)
Timeframe: 2 years post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Period 2: Sirolimus8
Period 2: Tacrolimus4

[back to top]

Graft Failure

Percentage of participants who failed to engraft. (NCT01135329)
Timeframe: Day 60

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Transplant8

[back to top]

Incidence of Success Based on the Investigator's Global Evaluation at the End of Treatment

(NCT01139450)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Test123
Reference130
Vehicle86

[back to top]

Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR ), Graft Loss or Death

The number of participants who experienced composite efficacy failure was analyzed. Composite efficacy failure was defined as treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss, or death. A BPAR was defined as an acute rejection confirmed by biopsy with a Rejection Activity Index (RAI) score ≥ 3. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, and venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died. (NCT01150097)
Timeframe: from months 24 to 36

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus2
Tacrolimus Elimination1
Tacrolimus Control3

[back to top]

Incidence Rate of tBPAR

The number of participants who had a tBPAR was analyzed. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, and venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection. (NCT01150097)
Timeframe: from months 24 - 36

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus0
Tacrolimus Elimination1
Tacrolimus Control2

[back to top]

Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR ), Graft Loss or Death

The number of participants who experienced composite efficacy failure was analyzed. Composite efficacy failure was defined as treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss, or death. A BPAR was defined as an acute rejection confirmed by biopsy with a Rejection Activity Index (RAI) score ≥ 3. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, and venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died. (NCT01150097)
Timeframe: from months 36 to 48

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus1
Tacrolimus Elimination0

[back to top]

Change in Renal Function

Change in renal function was assessed by the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) using the abbreviated (4 variables) Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-4) formula which was developed by the MDRD Study Group and has been validated in patients with chronic kidney disease. The MDRD-4 formula used for the eGFR calculation is: eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) = 186.3*(C^-1.154)*(A^-0.203)*G*R, where C is the serum concentration of creatinine (mg/dL), A is age (years), G=0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G=1, R=1.21 when race is black, otherwise R=1. (NCT01150097)
Timeframe: from months 24 to 36

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus-0.9
Tacrolimus Elimination2.5
Tacrolimus Control-3.3

[back to top]

Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Graft Loss or Death

The number of participants who experienced graft loss or death was analyzed. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died. (NCT01150097)
Timeframe: from months 24 to 36

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus2
Tacrolimus Elimination0
Tacrolimus Control1

[back to top]

Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Graft Loss or Death

The number of participants who experienced graft loss or death was analyzed. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died. (NCT01150097)
Timeframe: from months 36 - 48

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus0
Tacrolimus Elimination0

[back to top]

Remission Rate

Complete remission at 12 months Per KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis (2012): Complete remission (CR), urine protein creatinine ratio below 200mg/g (20mg/mmol) or 1+ of protein on urine dipstick for 3 consecutative days (NCT01162005)
Timeframe: 12-month treatment period

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SDNS/FRNS34
SRNS13

[back to top]

Duration of Remission

Mean duration of remission (NCT01162005)
Timeframe: 12-month treatment period

Interventionmonths (Mean)
SDNS/FRNS Group4.6
SRNS Group4.0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"Progression-free survival rate (percentage) at 2 and 5 years is defined as the percentage of patients who are alive and progression free at 2 and 5 years from date of transplantation respectively.~AML progression is defined as:~Reappearance of leukemia blast cells in peripheral blood and > 5% blasts in marrow~If no circulating blasts, but the marrow contains 5-20% blasts, a repeat bone marrow >= 1 week later with > 5% blasts~Development of extramedullary leukemia MDS progression is defined as~For patients with <5% bone marrow blasts: ≥50% increase in blasts to >5% blasts~For patients with 5-10% bone marrow blasts: ≥50% increase to >10% blasts~Any of the following: Reappearance of prior documented characteristic cytogenetic abnormality or refractory cytopenias with unequivocal evidence of dysplasia on bone marrow biopsy/aspirate" (NCT01168219)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
PFS at 2 yearsPFS at 5 years
Treatment (Chemotherapy and Transplant)41.226.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival rate (percentage) at 2 and 5 years is defined as the percentage of patients who are still alive 2 and 5 years after date of transplantation respectively. Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator. (NCT01168219)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
OS at 2 yearsOS at 5 years
Treatment (Chemotherapy and Transplant)45.731.2

[back to top]

100-day Mortality

The number of death reported within the first 100 days after transplant. (NCT01168219)
Timeframe: Up to 100 days post-treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy and Transplant)10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Biomarkers, C-reactive Protein (CRP)

Blood samples were collected to analyze CRP. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01169701)
Timeframe: Baseline, month 6, month 24

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Month 6 (n=27,30)Month 24 (n=24,24)
Everolimus0.326-0.040
Tacrolimus0.5120.100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Major Cardiovascular Events (MACE)

The percentage of participants who experienced MACE were reported. MACE included acute myocardial infarction, insertion or replacement of implantable defibrillator, peripheral vascular disorders, congestive heart failure, coronary artery bypass, other events, percutaneous coronary intervention and stroke. (NCT01169701)
Timeframe: Month 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus0.00
Everolimus0.00

[back to top]

Renal Function Measured by Serum Creatinine

Serum samples were collected to analyze serum creatinine. (NCT01169701)
Timeframe: Month 6, month 12, month 24

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Month 6 (n=33,29)Month 12 (n=32,28)Month 24 (n= 31,26)
Everolimus1.2341.2561.260
Tacrolimus1.2321.2311.217

[back to top]

Renal Function as Measured by Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)

Estimated GFR was caluclated using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. (NCT01169701)
Timeframe: Month 6, month 12, month 24

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Month 6 (n=33,29)Month 12 (n=32,28)Month 24 (n=31,26)
Everolimus63.78161.22560.779
Tacrolimus55.64857.75757.727

[back to top]

Renal Function as Measured by Creatinine Clearance

Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Cockroft-Gault formula. (NCT01169701)
Timeframe: Month 6, month 12, month 24

,
Interventionmg/min (Mean)
Month 6 (n=29,25)Month 12 (n=28,25)Month 24 (n=28,24)
Everolimus76.61873.36372.910
Tacrolimus64.84165.03766.933

[back to top]

Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV)

Utilizing the SphygmoCor Device, ECG leads placed at the carotid and femoral arteries provided the measure of the pulse wave at that particular arterial location. The distance between the two vascular beds divided by the pulse wave time shift provided a measure of the pulse wave velocity. (NCT01169701)
Timeframe: Month 6, month 24

,
Interventionm/sec (Mean)
Month 6 (n=31,30)Month 24 (n=28,25)
Everolimus7.407.06
Tacrolimus7.017.58

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss, Death and Lost to Follow up

The incidence of BPAR, graft loss, death and lost to follow-up events was calculated using relative frequency. (NCT01169701)
Timeframe: Month 24

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
BPARGraft lossDeathsLost to follow-up
Everolimus0.000.000.000.00
Tacrolimus0.000.000.003.13

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, Type 1 Procollagen Amino-terminal-propeptide (PINP)

Blood samples were collected to analyze PCR. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01169701)
Timeframe: Baseline, month 6, month 24

,
Interventionug/l (Mean)
Month 6 (n=27,30)Month 24 (n=24,24)
Everolimus-33.36-28.17
Tacrolimus-13.82-13.65

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide Fraction (NT-proBNP)

Blood samples were collected to analyze NT-proBNP. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01169701)
Timeframe: Baseline, month 6, month 24

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Month 6 (n=27,30)Month 24 (n=24,24)
Everolimus-79.10-193.3
Tacrolimus21.604-80.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI)

Left ventricular hypertrophy grade was assessed by echocardiogram where the left ventricular mass index was calculated. The presence of LVM was defined as > 49.2 g/m^2.7 in men and >46.7 g/m^2.7 in women. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01169701)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

Interventiong/m^2.7 (Mean)
Tacrolimus-6.071
Everolimus-4.008

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, Myeloperoxidase (MPO)

Blood samples were collected to analyze MPO. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01169701)
Timeframe: Baseline, month 6, month 24

,
InterventionU/mL (Mean)
Month 6 (n=27,30)Month 24 (n=24,24)
Everolimus-0.093-0.642
Tacrolimus0.433-0.329

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Blood samples were collected to analyze HbA1c. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01169701)
Timeframe: Baseline, month 6, month 24

,
InterventionPercentage of HbA1c (Mean)
Month 6 (n=20,22)Month12 (n=22,20)
Everolimus0.1590.185
Tacrolimus0.0150.045

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean 24 Hour Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Blood pressure was measured using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01169701)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, month 12, month 24

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Month 6 (n=31,29)Month 12 (n=28,24)Month 24 (n=29,24)
Everolimus3.22.72.0
Tacrolimus-0.62.12.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Biomarkers: Troponin I and Collagen Type 1 C-telopeptide (ICTP)

Blood samples were collected to analyze Troponin I and collagen type 1 C-telopeptide (ICTP). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01169701)
Timeframe: Baseline, month 6, month 24

,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Troponin 1, Month 6 (n=27,30)Troponin 1, Month 24 (n=24,24)ICTP, Month 6 (n=27,30)ICTP, Month 24 (n=24,24)
Everolimus-0.006-0.007-0.195-0.125
Tacrolimus0.0000.0030.049-0.035

[back to top]

Estimated Two Year Progression Free Survival Rate for Participants Undergoing Only Autologous Transplant

(NCT01181271)
Timeframe: Two Years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Autologous Then Allogeneic Transplant46

[back to top]

Estimated Two Year Progression Free Survival Rate for All Participants

(NCT01181271)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Autologous Then Allogeneic Transplant64

[back to top]

Estimated Two Year Progression Free Survival Rate for Participants Undergoing Both Autologous and Allogeneic Transplants

(NCT01181271)
Timeframe: 2 years after allogeneic transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Autologous Then Allogeneic Transplant72

[back to top]

Peripheral Blood All-cell Donor Chimerism

Successful donor stem cell engraftment is defined as when ≥ 80% of hematopoietic elements are donor-derived as determined by chimerism assays from peripheral blood at day 100 after non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. (NCT01181271)
Timeframe: 100 days post allogeneic transplant

Interventionpercentage of donor-derived elements (Median)
Autologous Then Allogeneic Transplant95

[back to top]

Number of Days After Allogeneic Transplant Until Absolute Neutrophil Count Was Equal to or Greater Than 500/uL

(NCT01181271)
Timeframe: within 28 days after allogeneic transplant

Interventiondays (Median)
Autologous Then Allogeneic Transplant12

[back to top]

Estimated Two Year Overall Survival Rate for Participants Undergoing Only Autologous Transplant

(NCT01181271)
Timeframe: two years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Autologous Then Allogeneic Transplant69

[back to top]

Estimated Two Year Overall Survival Rate for Participants Undergoing Both Autologous and Allogeneic Transplants

(NCT01181271)
Timeframe: Two-years after Allogeneic Transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Autologous Then Allogeneic Transplant89

[back to top]

Estimated Two Year Overall Survival Rate for All Participants

(NCT01181271)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Autologous Then Allogeneic Transplant83

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Grades II to IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

Grade I GVHD is characterized as mild disease, grade II GVHD as moderate, grade III as severe, and grade IV life-threatening. (NCT01181271)
Timeframe: within 200 days after allogeneic transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Autologous Then Allogeneic Transplant13.8

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Non-relapse Mortality

Non-relapse mortality is defined as participants who die from causes other than their underlying disease relapse, such as infection or graft versus host disease (NCT01181271)
Timeframe: 2-years after allogeneic transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Autologous Then Allogeneic Transplant11.1

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Extensive Chronic Graft-versus-host-disease

Extensive chronic graft versus-host-disease (GVHD) was defined as GVHD that required systemic immunosuppression. (NCT01181271)
Timeframe: 1-year after allogeneic transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Autologous Then Allogeneic Transplant37.9

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Disease Relapse

(NCT01181271)
Timeframe: 2-years after allogeneic transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Autologous Then Allogeneic Transplant17.2

[back to top]

For the 24-month Analysis, the Endpoint Includes Additional Treatment Failures That Occurred During the 12-month Treatment Extension Period, up to Day 734 After the Randomization Date.

Treatment failure is a composite endpoint; a patient is considered a treatment failure if the patient experienced any of the following events during this period (day 1 to day 734): death, graft failure, BPAR (Banff grade ≥1A) or lost to follow-up. (NCT01187953)
Timeframe: 734 days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
DeathGraft FailureBiobsy Proven Acute RejectionLost to follow up
LCP-Tacro1111464
Prograf (Tacrolimus)1315508

[back to top]

The Primary Efficacy Endpoint for the Study is the Proportion of Treatment Failures Within 12 Months After Randomization to Study Drug.

Treatment failure is a composite endpoint; a patient is considered a treatment failure if the patient experienced any of the following events during this period: death, graft failure, BPAR (Banff grade ≥1A) or lost to follow-up. (NCT01187953)
Timeframe: 360 days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
DeathGraft FailureBiobsy Proven Acute RejectionLost to follow up
LCP-Tacro89354
Prograf (Tacrolimus)811375

[back to top]

Safety Defined by Serious Adverse Events

Counted the number of participants that experienced any type of grade 3 or higher toxicity. (NCT01246206)
Timeframe: Assessed first 6 months post transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus and Thymoglobulin19

[back to top]

Severity of Acute GVHD

Cumulative Incidence of grade III-V acute GVHD with relapse or NRM as competing risks (NCT01246206)
Timeframe: Assessed first 6 months post transplant

Intervention% of participants with sever aGVHD (Number)
Tacrolimus and Thymoglobulin10.0

[back to top]

"Determine Time to Engraftment (G500)"

"The number of days until engraftment (G500)" (NCT01246206)
Timeframe: Followed for up to two years post transplant

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus and Thymoglobulin11

[back to top]

Overall Survival at Two Year,

(NCT01246206)
Timeframe: Followed for up to two years post transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus and Thymoglobulin75.0

[back to top]

"Determine Time to Engraftment (PLT20)"

"The number of days until engraftment (PLT20)" (NCT01246206)
Timeframe: Followed for up to two years post transplant

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus and Thymoglobulin17

[back to top]

Determine Incidence of Opportunistic Infections

(NCT01246206)
Timeframe: Followed for up to two years post transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus and Thymoglobulin95.0

[back to top]

Estimate Incidence of Chronic GVHD at Two Years

Cumulative Incidence of chronic GVHD with relapse or NRM as competing risks (NCT01246206)
Timeframe: Followed for up to two years post transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus and Thymoglobulin75.0

[back to top]

Incidence of Acute GVHD

Cumulative Incidence of grade II-V acute GVHD with relapse or NRM as competing risks (NCT01246206)
Timeframe: Assessed first 6 months post transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus and Thymoglobulin45.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

An AE was defined as the appearance or worsening of any undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition occurring after starting the study drug even if the event was not considered to be related to study drug. An SAE was an event which: was fatal or life-threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; constituted a congenital anomaly/birth defect; required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; was medically significant, i.e., an event that jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. (NCT01256294)
Timeframe: 28 Days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventSerious adverse event
Branded Tacrolimus121
Generic Tacrolimus80

[back to top]

Trough Plasma Drug Concentration (C0) at Steady State

Trough plasma drug concentration measured prior to drug administration at steady state (after 14 days of treatment with each study drug). (NCT01256294)
Timeframe: Days 14 and 28: predose

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 14 [N= 34, 33]Day 28 [N=31, 33]
Branded Tacrolimus7.017.04
Generic Tacrolimus7.257.26

[back to top]

Dose-Normalized Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 12 Hours (AUC0-12h) at Steady State

"Dose-normalized area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 12 hours (AUC0-12h) at steady state after 14 days of treatment with each study drug.~Geometric mean and 95% confidence intervals were determined from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model for the dose-normalized log transformed values with treatment, period and sequence as fixed factors and patients nested within sequences as a random factor." (NCT01256294)
Timeframe: Days 14 and 28: Predose and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 hours after dosing.

Interventionng*hr/mL/mg (Geometric Mean)
Generic Tacrolimus51.73
Branded Tacrolimus50.58

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Reported Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection Episodes

(NCT01256294)
Timeframe: 28 Days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Generic Tacrolimus0
Branded Tacrolimus0

[back to top]

Dose-normalized Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) at Steady State

Maximum (peak) plasma drug concentration after drug administration at steady state (after 14 days of treatment with each study drug). Geometric mean and 95% confidence intervals were determined from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model for the dose-normalized log transformed values with treatment, period and sequence as fixed factors and patients nested within sequences as a random factor. (NCT01256294)
Timeframe: Days 14 and 28: Predose and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 hours after dosing.

Interventionng/mL/mg (Geometric Mean)
Generic Tacrolimus8.34
Branded Tacrolimus7.62

[back to top]

Intra-patient Variability of Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetic Parameters

The intra-patient variability of tacrolimus pharmacokinetics of each formulation was evaluated by comparing AUC0-12h, maximum drug concentration (Cmax) and trough drug concentration (C0) at Days 7 and 14, and Days 21 and 28. Intra-patient variability was assessed by a calculation of the coefficient of variation, by patient, using the repeated measurements within each Period, where the coefficient of variation (%) = standard deviation/mean*100. (NCT01256294)
Timeframe: Days 7 and 14, and Days 21 and 28.

,
Interventionpercent coefficient of variation (Mean)
AUC0-12hCmaxC0
Branded Tacrolimus11.0217.8611.07
Generic Tacrolimus13.4116.9213.24

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS)

Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Proportions will be estimated using point as well as interval estimators. All interval estimators will be constructed using the finite sample size sampling distribution at the unadjusted two-sided level of 0.05. (NCT01256398)
Timeframe: 10 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Transplant)29.7

[back to top]

Probability of Being BCR-ABL Negative in the Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood at the Completion of the CNS Prophylaxis Course (Restricted to Those Patients Achieving a CR)

Proportions will be estimated based on the combined and individual cohorts. (NCT01256398)
Timeframe: 10 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Transplant)0.667

[back to top]

Response

Proportion of patients reaching a CR. A CR requires the following: an absolute neutrophil count (segs and bands) >1000/μL, no circulating blasts, platelets >100,000/μL; adequate bone marrow cellularity with trilineage hematopoiesis, and <5% marrow leukemia blast cells. All previous extramedullary manifestations of disease must be absent (e.g., lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, skin or gum infiltration, testicular masses, or CNS involvement). (NCT01256398)
Timeframe: 10 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Transplant).9846

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Proportions will be estimated using point as well as interval estimators. All interval estimators will be constructed using the finite sample size sampling distribution at the unadjusted two-sided level of 0.05. (NCT01256398)
Timeframe: 10 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Transplant)55.9

[back to top]

Feasibility of Maintenance Therapy in This Patient Population (Restricted to Those Patients Achieving a CR). Feasibility Will be Defined as the Number of Deaths Ocuring.

Proportions will be estimated based on the combined and individual cohorts. (NCT01256398)
Timeframe: 10 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Transplant)5

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival Defined From the Date of First Induction Complete Response (CR) to Relapse or Death Due to Any Cause

Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Proportions will be estimated using point as well as interval estimators. All interval estimators will be constructed using the finite sample size sampling distribution at the unadjusted two-sided level of 0.05. (NCT01256398)
Timeframe: At 3 years after CR

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Transplant)52.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dialysis Events

Any dialysis required by end of study. (NCT01265537)
Timeframe: 6 months post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Low Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)1
Standard Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Graft Failure

Any graft failure by the end of the study. (NCT01265537)
Timeframe: 6 months post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Low Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)0
Standard Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hospitalization Events

Any hospitalization by end of study. (NCT01265537)
Timeframe: 6 months post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Low Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)0
Standard Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Event

Any cardiovascular events by end of study. (NCT01265537)
Timeframe: 6 months post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Low Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)0
Standard Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weight

Any changes in weight by end of study. (NCT01265537)
Timeframe: baseline to 6 months post transplant

Interventionkg (Median)
Low Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)2.8
Standard Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)1.5

[back to top]

eGFR at 6 Months

Participant eGFR value by end of study. (NCT01265537)
Timeframe: 6 months post transplant

InterventionmL/min/1.73^2 (Median)
Low Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)56
Standard Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)51

[back to top]

Number of Participants With New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Acute Rejection

Composite endpoint of biopsy proven acute rejection and NODAT at 6 months post transplantation. NODAT will be defined as either FPG >7.0mmol/L OR symptoms of hyperglycemia and a random plasma glucose of >11.1 OR 2-h plasma glucose >11.1 during an oral glucose tolerance test(OGTT). (NCT01265537)
Timeframe: 6 months post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Low Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)2
Standard Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)2

[back to top]

Number of Any Leukopenia Events

Any leukopenia by end of study. (NCT01265537)
Timeframe: 6 months post transplant

Interventionevents (Number)
Low Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)11
Standard Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Infection Events

Any infection (CMV, opportunistic infections including urinary tract infections requiring treatment, pneumonia) by end of study. (NCT01265537)
Timeframe: 6 months post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Low Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)5
Standard Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)5

[back to top]

Number of Leukopenia Events on ≥2 Occasions

Any leukopenia on ≥2 occasions by end of study. (NCT01265537)
Timeframe: 6 months post transplant

Interventionevents (Number)
Low Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)6
Standard Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)0

[back to top]

Number of Participant Deaths

Death of any participant by end of study. (NCT01265537)
Timeframe: 6 months post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Low Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)0
Standard Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Malignancy Events

Any malignancy (including post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease) by end of study. (NCT01265537)
Timeframe: 6 months post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Low Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)0
Standard Target Tacrolimus (Advagraf)1

[back to top]

Re-transplantation or Re-listed for Transplantation

Re-transplantation is defined as the receipt of a subsequent heart transplant and re-listed for transplantation is being listed back on the heart transplant list to be re-transplanted. (NCT01278745)
Timeframe: 6 to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Episodes of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) of Any Grade Per Participant

The number of times a participant experienced biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR). Biopsy proven acute rejection is when an examination of tissue removed from the transplanted organ indicates that the subject's immune system is trying to reject the graft. BPAR was defined as a biopsy that met the International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria to be graded as 1R or greater rejection and was determined by a single, central pathology laboratory. (NCT01278745)
Timeframe: 6 to 12 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
0 Episodes of BPAR1 Episode of BPAR2 Episodes of BPAR3 Episodes of BPAR4 Episodes of BPAR
Placebo18281482
Rituximab45131792

[back to top]

Incidence of AMR

The number of participants who experienced antibody- mediated rejection (AMR). Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) occurs when the subject develops antibodies directed against the transplanted heart. This was assessed based on local pathology biopsy reads. (NCT01278745)
Timeframe: 6 to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab8
Placebo11

[back to top]

Death

Participants who died within 12 months post-transplant (NCT01278745)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab3
Placebo5

[back to top]

Change in Percent Atheroma Volume (PAV)

Nominal or noticeable change, bad or good, from baseline to 1 year in percent atheroma volume (PAV) which is a measure of the degree of coronary arterial obstruction due to host alloimmune processes measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in a target coronary artery. Thus a decrease in PAV would be an indicator of less obstruction and a better outcome. (NCT01278745)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 year

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Rituximab6.8
Placebo1.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Post-transplant Serious Infections Requiring Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy

Number of participants experiencing at least one serious infection requiring intravenous antimicrobial therapy which is used to kill the growth of microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, or protozoans. (NCT01278745)
Timeframe: Transplantation through end of study, up to 1 year post transplantation.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab16
Placebo13

[back to top]

Incidence of Cellular Rejection

Cellular Rejection refers to the organ recipient's immune system recognizing a transplanted organ as foreign and mounting a response to it via cellular mechanisms. Cellular rejection was defined as a biopsy which met The International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria to be graded as 1R or greater rejection and was determined by a single, central pathology laboratory (NCT01278745)
Timeframe: 6 to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab41
Placebo52

[back to top]

Incidence of Any Treated Rejection

The number of participants who were treated by their local physician for any type of rejection including, but not limited to cellular rejection and antibody- mediated rejection (AMR) of the transplanted heart regardless of the presence of a biopsy. (NCT01278745)
Timeframe: 6 to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab22
Placebo24

[back to top]

Incidence of BPAR (Any Grade)

The number of subjects who experienced any grade of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) within the clinical trial. Biopsy proven acute rejection is when an examination of tissue removed from the transplanted organ indicates that the subject's immune system is trying to reject the graft. BPAR was defined as a biopsy which met The International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria to be graded as 1R or greater rejection and was determined by a single, central pathology laboratory. (NCT01278745)
Timeframe: 6 to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab41
Placebo52

[back to top]

Post-transplant Safety Outcomes Among Participants: Safety and Tolerability of Rituximab

Defined as participants that experienced at least one adverse event that was possibly, probably, or definitely related to the study drug (i.e., Rituximab or Placebo). Serious adverse events were used to evaluate this endpoint and the attribution was based on the DAIT Medical Monitor's assessment. (NCT01278745)
Timeframe: Transplantation through end of study, up to 1 year post transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab26
Placebo26

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Development of Angiographically Evident Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is an aggressive form of atherosclerosis that is characterized by the development of fibrosis affecting cardiac arteries that result in concentric narrowing of the arteries and, ultimately allograft failure. Development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy can be diagnosed via an angiograph which is an X-ray of the cardiac arteries by injecting a radiopaque substance such as iodine. (NCT01278745)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab19
Placebo7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Episodes of Rejection Associated With Hemodynamic Compromise (HDC)

The number of participants that experienced at least one episode of rejection associated with hemodynamic compromise (HDC). Rejection associated with HDC is when there is insufficient blood flow to the transplanted heart in association with acute rejection found in a biopsy. Local biopsies were used for this outcome measure. (NCT01278745)
Timeframe: 6 to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab2
Placebo1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Post-transplant Incidence of PTLD

The number of participants experiencing at least one post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurrence during this trial. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder is an uncontrolled proliferation of B cell lymphocytes latently infected with Epstein-Barr virus. (NCT01278745)
Timeframe: Transplantation through end of study, up to 1 year post transplantation.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Tacrolimus Bioavailability (F)

Tac bioavailability alone vs. Tac bioavailability with Keto. To determine F we took the ratio of area under the curve of the oral dose divided by the area under the curve of the IV dose. F was determined by fitting a model that considered the plasma concentration of tac with IV vs. oral dosing. (NCT01288521)
Timeframe: baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionratio of oral to IV (Mean)
Tacrolimus Alone0.224
Tacrolimus + Ketoconazole0.681

[back to top]

Phase II: Percent of Patients Alive and Free of Progression at 12 Months Following Transplant

Percent of patients and the 95% Binomial Confidence interval who were alive and free of progression at 12 months following transplant for the patients in Phase II. Progression will be based on International Myeloma Working Group criteria where patients may meet any one of the following criteria - increase of 25% or more in serum or urine M-protein from baseline, Serum M-protein and/or the absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dl, Urine M-protein and/or absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24 hours, development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacyomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacyomas, or development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum Ca++>11.5 mg/dl) that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT01303965)
Timeframe: Transplant (Day 0) through 1 year post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II18.2

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Phase II - Percent of Patients With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)

Percent of patients and the 95% Binomial Confidence interval who had any chronic GvHD reported based on Filipovich et al. consensus document (BB&MT 2005) and Akpek et al. chronic GvHD grading system (Blood 2003) for patients in Phase II. (NCT01303965)
Timeframe: Transplant (Day 0) through 1 year post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II18.2

[back to top]

Phase II - Percent of Patients With Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)

"Percent of patients and the 95% Binomial Confidence interval who had any stage I-IV acute GvHD based on the modified Keystone Grading Scale for skin, liver and gastrointestinal symptoms for patients in Phase II. Zero means no acute GvHD was reported, and higher stages are worse outcomes (range of 0-4).~For skin: 0=no rash; 1=erthematous macular rash over <25% body surface; 2=over 25-50% of body surface; 4=bullae, exfoliation ulcerative dermatitis.~For liver (bilirubin (mg/dL)): 0= <2.0; 1= 2-<2.9; 3= 3-<5.9; 4= >=15 . For gut changes (diarrhea[ml/day]): 0=none; 1= >500-1000; 2= >1000-1500; 3= >1500; 4=severe abdominal pain with or without ileus.~Overall grade 0: Skin=0; liver=0; gut changes=0. Overall grade 1: Skin with 1 or 2; liver=0; gut changes=0. Overall grade 2: Skin with 1, 2, or 3; liver=1; gut changes=1. Overall grade 3: Skin with 2 or 3; liver with 2 or 3; gut changes with 2 or 3. Overall grade 4: Patients with grade 4 toxicity in any organ system." (NCT01303965)
Timeframe: Day 0 through 1 year post transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II36.4

[back to top]

Phase II - Time to Neutrophil Engraftment

Time to neutrophil engraftment will be analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The time to engraftment of neutrophils is defined as the time from day 0 to the date of the first of three consecutive days after transplantation during which the absolute neutrophils count (ANC) is at least 0.5 x109/l. Patients surviving at least 14 days after transplant will be evaluable for this endpoint. Patients who did not have neutrophil engraftment before death will be censored at the date of death. The median and 95% confidence intervals will be provided. (NCT01303965)
Timeframe: Transplant (Day 0) through 1 year post transplant

Interventiondays (Median)
Phase II11

[back to top]

Phase II - Time to Platelet Engraftment

Time to platelet engraftment will be analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The time to engraftment of platelets is defined as the time from day 0 to the first of three consecutive Complete Blood Counts (CBCs) obtained on different days after transplantation during which the platelet count is at least 20 x109/l. The CBCs obtained should be at least seven days after the most recent platelet transfusion. Only patients who achieved engraftment of platelets will be included in the analysis. The median and 95% confidence intervals will be provided. (NCT01303965)
Timeframe: Transplant (Day 0) through 1 year post-transplant

Interventiondays (Median)
Phase II19

[back to top]

Phase I: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity

The number of patients who had a DLT during the dose finding/confirming portion (Phase I) of the trial for the safety of the combination of sirolimus, tacrolimus and lenalidomid. Patients will be monitored for 28 days (a cycle) to determine whether a DLT is experienced for the specific dose level. (NCT01303965)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I Dose Finding0

[back to top]

Immunosuppression-free Duration in Days, Defined as Time From Completion of Immunosuppression Withdrawal to End of Trial Participation or to Time of Restarting Immunosuppression

Time (in days) from when the participant is off all immunosuppression to the end of trial participation or re-initiation of immunosuppression, whichever is earliest. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through end of trial participation (up to 4.4 years post-transplant)

InterventionDays (Median)
Transplanted374

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Requiring Anti-lymphocyte Therapy (OKT3, ATG) for an Acute Rejection Event

Anti-lymphocyte therapy is a drug that targets specific cells in the immune system called lymphocytes (white blood cells). This therapy helps stop the participant's immune system from attacking the donor kidney. The endpoint is summarized with a two-sided, 95% exact binomial confidence interval. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through end of trial participation (up to 4.4 years post-transplant)

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)20

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Successfully Withdrawn From Immunosuppression and Remained Off Immunosuppression for at Least 52 Weeks

Participants are considered successfully withdrawn from immunosuppression if they remained off immunosuppression for at least 52 weeks without evidence of rejection, as determined by a biopsy performed 52 weeks after completion of immunosuppression withdrawal. All participants who failed to complete immunosuppression withdrawal, regardless of reason, or failed to have a biopsy 52 weeks after completion of immunosuppression withdrawal, were considered to have failed. The endpoint is summarized with a two-sided, 95% exact binomial confidence interval. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through 52 weeks after discontinuation of all immunosuppression

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)20

[back to top]

Percent of Transplant Participants Who Died

Death after receiving a kidney transplant. The endpoint is summarized with a two-sided, 95% exact binomial confidence interval. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through end of trial participation (up to 4.4 years post-transplant)

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)0

[back to top]

Percent of Transplanted Participants Who Achieve Either Sirolimus Monotherapy or Monotherapy on a Mycophenolic Compound Within 52 Weeks Post-transplant

Participants that were treated with only sirolimus or treated with only mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or mycophenolic acid within 52 weeks after transplantation. The endpoint is summarized with a two-sided, 95% exact binomial confidence interval. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through 52 weeks post-transplantation

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)70

[back to top]

Percent of Transplanted Participants Who Achieve MMF or Mycophenolic Acid Monotherapy Within 52 Weeks Post-transplant in Those Participants Intolerant of Sirolimus

Participants that were treated with only mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or mycophenolic acid within 52 weeks after transplantation in those who could not tolerate sirolimus. The endpoint is summarized with a two-sided, 95% exact binomial confidence interval. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through 52 weeks post-transplantation

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)33

[back to top]

Percent of Transplanted Participants Who Remain Off Immunosuppression for at Least 52 Weeks Including Those in Whom the 52 Week Biopsy Was Not Performed

Participants are considered successfully withdrawn from immunosuppression if they remained off immunosuppression for at least 52 weeks without evidence of rejection. A biopsy performed 52 weeks after completion of immunosuppression withdrawal confirmed that there was no sub-clinical evidence of rejection. This result considers a participant off all immunosuppression for at least 52 weeks with or without the confirmatory week 52 biopsy as a success. The endpoint is summarized with a two-sided, 95% exact binomial confidence interval. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through 52 weeks after discontinuation of all immunosuppression

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)20

[back to top]

Percent of Transplanted Participants Who Remain Off Immunosuppression for the Duration of the Study as Defined as Completion of All Schedules of Events/Followed Through August 25, 2017

Participants that remained off all immunosuppression through the completion of study participation. The endpoint is summarized with a two-sided, 95% exact binomial confidence interval. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through study completion (up to 4.4 years post-transplant)

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)10

[back to top]

Percent of Transplanted Participants With Acute Rejection or Presumed Acute Rejection

Participants with either biopsy proven acute rejection per Banff guidelines or participants that were treated for acute rejection in the absence of a biopsy. The endpoint is summarized with a two-sided, 95% exact binomial confidence interval. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through end of trial participation (up to 4.4 years post-transplant)

InterventionPercent of participants (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)90

[back to top]

Percent of Transplanted Participants With Graft Loss

A participant is considered to have graft loss when the donated kidney needs to be removed, the participant is retransplanted with another donor kidney, or chronic dialysis is instituted. The endpoint is summarized with a two-sided, 95% exact binomial confidence interval. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through end of trial participation (up to 4.4 years post-transplant)

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)0

[back to top]

Time From Transplant to the First Episode of Acute Rejection Requiring Treatment

Time (in days) from transplant to the start date of the first dose of treatment for acute rejection. This includes acute rejection episodes requiring treatment that are not biopsy proven. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through end of trial participation (up to 4.4 years post-transplant)

InterventionDays (Median)
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)1008.5

[back to top]

Histological Severity of Biopsies Demonstrating Acute Rejection as Measured by Banff 2007 Grade

"Biopsy-confirmed 1.) acute cellular rejection and 2.) acute antibody-mediated rejection was classified according to Banff 2007 criteria of renal allograft pathology for renal allograft rejection. A Banff result of indeterminate was not classified as rejection.~Acute cellular rejection occurs when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection is defined as a grade ≥ IA. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe.~Acute antibody-mediated rejection-or humoral rejection-is defined as a grade ≥1. Severity is graded as I, II, or III, with I being the mildest form of antibody-mediated rejection and III being the most severe." (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through end of trial participation (up to 4.4 years post-transplant)

InterventionBiopsies (Number)
Acute Cellular Rejection (Type IA)Acute Cellular Rejection (Type IB)Acute Cellular Rejection (Type IIA)Acute Cellular Rejection (Type IIB)Acute Cellular Rejection (Type III)Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection (Type I)Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection (Type II)Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection (Type III)
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)73000000

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events, Including Number of Post-transplant Infections, Wound Complications, Lymphocoele, Post-transplant Diabetes Mellitus, and Malignancies

Adverse events that are reported as being a post-transplant infection, wound complication, lymphocoele (a collection of fluid in the lymphatic system), post-transplant diabetes mellitus or malignancy. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through end of trial participation (up to 4.4 years post-transplant)

InterventionEvents (Number)
Post-Transplant InfectionWound ComplicationsLymphocoelePost-Transplant Diabetes MellitusMalignancy
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)41000

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Chronic T Cell-mediated or Antibody-mediated Rejection

This assessment included participants who experienced chronic T cell-mediated rejection or chronic antibody mediated rejection as well as progressive interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA), transplant glomerulopathy or chronic obliterative arteriopathy without an alternative, non-rejection-related cause. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through end of trial participation (up to 4.4 years post-transplant)

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)0

[back to top]

Participant Diastolic Blood Pressure Over Time

Diastolic blood pressure measures the pressure in the arteries when the heart is at rest and is thus filled with blood. A normal diastolic blood pressure is lower than 80 mmHg. High blood pressure, as known as hypertension, is a risk factor for coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, and other complications if left unmanaged. The value closest to and within 6 weeks of the day expected was selected. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: 26, 52, 104, 156, and 208 Weeks Post-Transplant

InterventionmmHg (Median)
26 Weeks Post-Transplant52 Weeks Post-Transplant104 Weeks Post-Transplant156 Weeks Post-Transplant208 Weeks Post-Transplant
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)77.577797673

[back to top]

Participant Glucose Level Over Time

This is a measure of glucose found in the blood. Glucose, a sugar, is an energy source that the body relies on to properly function. If levels are too high for a long period of time, diabetes can develop. Diabetes can result in many long-term complications such as eye, kidney, and nerve damage, stroke, and cardiovascular complications. Fasting levels for glucose should be around 70-99 mg/dL and less than 140 mg/dL within 2 hours after a meal. The value closest to and within 6 weeks of the day expected was selected. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: 26, 52, 104, 156, and 208 Weeks Post-Transplant

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
26 Weeks Post-Transplant52 Weeks Post-Transplant104 Weeks Post-Transplant156 Weeks Post-Transplant208 Weeks Post-Transplant
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)103.510896.5104.583.5

[back to top]

Participant Systolic Blood Pressure Over Time

Systolic blood pressure measures the pressure on the blood vessels when the heart is beats and thus is pushing blood to the rest of the body. A normal systolic blood pressure is lower than 120 mmHg. High blood pressure, as known as hypertension, is a risk factor for coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, and other complications if left unmanaged. The value closest to and within 6 weeks of the day expected was selected. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: 26, 52, 104, 156, and 208 Weeks Post-Transplant

InterventionmmHg (Median)
26 Weeks Post-Transplant52 Weeks Post-Transplant104 Weeks Post-Transplant156 Weeks Post-Transplant208 Weeks Post-Transplant
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)131.5135137140132

[back to top]

Participant Total Cholesterol Over Time

Total cholesterol measures the amount of cholesterol found in the blood. Cholesterol is a waxy substance your body needs to build cells, but too much can be a problem since it can build-up in arteries. Narrowed arteries can result in heart attack or stroke. A value less than 200 mg/dL is considered good. The value closest to and within 12 weeks of the day expected was selected. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: 26, 52, 104, 156, and 208 Weeks Post-Transplant

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
26 Weeks Post-Transplant52 Weeks Post-Transplant104 Weeks Post-Transplant156 Weeks Post-Transplant208 Weeks Post-Transplant
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)188141.5165175173

[back to top]

Participant Renal Function as Measured by GFR Using CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. A value less than 15 indicates kidney failure, 15 to 29 indicates severe loss of kidney function, 30 to 44 indicates moderate to severe loss of kidney function, 45 to 59 mild to moderate loss of kidney function, 60 to 89 indicates mild loss of kidney function, and 90 or higher indicates normal kidney function. The equation developed by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) is used to estimate GFR from serum creatinine. The value closest to and within 6 weeks of the day expected was selected. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: 26, 52, 104, 156, and 208 Weeks Post-Transplant

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Median)
26 Weeks Post-Transplant52 Weeks Post-Transplant104 Weeks Post-Transplant156 Weeks Post-Transplant208 Weeks Post-Transplant
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)60.370.963.756.756.0

[back to top]

Time From Completion of Immunosuppression Withdrawal to First Episode of Acute Rejection or Presumed Acute Rejection

Time (in days) from when the participant is off all immunosuppression to the first episode of biopsy proven or presumed acute rejection. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through end of trial participation (up to 4.4 years post-transplant)

InterventionDays (Median)
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)380

[back to top]

Percent of Transplanted Participants Who Achieve Sirolimus Monotherapy Within 52 Weeks Post-transplant

Participants that were treated with only sirolimus within 52 weeks after transplantation in those who could tolerant sirolimus. The endpoint is summarized with a two-sided, 95% exact binomial confidence interval. (NCT01318915)
Timeframe: Transplantation through 52 weeks post-transplantation

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Induction (Rituximab and ATG)86

[back to top]

The Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD Requiring Systemic Immune Suppression up to 1 Year After Stem Cell Infusion

(NCT01323920)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade/Tac/MTX53

[back to top]

The Cumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD up to Day 100 After Stem Cell Infusion

The primary outcome of this study is the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD up to Day 100 after stem cell infusion. Acute GHVD is graded according to the modified Glucksberg criteria (adapted from Thomas et al., NEJM ,1975, pp. 895-90), which is based on criteria by which the provider classifies acute GVHD per its objective organ staging. Acute GVHD is assessed in weekly standard of care visits post stem cell infusion and is captured in the protocol EDC upon evaluation of clinical notes up to Day 100. Data for acute GVHD organ staging and etiologies are collected in an acute GVHD separate case report form and do not include system organ class, expectedness or attribution. (NCT01323920)
Timeframe: Day 100

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade/Tac/MTX32

[back to top]

The Non-relapse Mortality, Progression-free and Overall Survival up to 1 Year After Stem Cell Infusion

Progression free and overall survival by 1 year after stem cell infusion will be assessed using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Progression-free survival will be defined as the time from stem cell infusion to the time of disease progression or death from any cause. Overall survival will be defined as the time from stem cell infusion to the time to death from any cause. Patients will be censored at the time last documented alive. Cumulative incidence and Kaplan-Meier curves will be constructed as appropriate. Progression is defined per clinical presentation, not protocol specified, and vary per disease, e.g. blasts in bone marrow or peripheral blood for AML/MDS; lymphoma + on PET/CT re-staging etc. (NCT01323920)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
non-relapse mortalityprogression-free survivaloverall survival
Velcade/Tac/MTX8.88584

[back to top]

The Percentage Donor Engraftment up to Day 30 Post Stem Cell Infusion

To assess the percentage donor engraftment up to day 30 post stem cell infusion, defined as the first of 3 consecutive days tested of documented absolute netrophil count (ANC) >/= 500 cells/u/L (NCT01323920)
Timeframe: Day 30

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade/Tac/MTX94

[back to top]

Time to Engraftment in First Transplant Recipients Only With Median Thoracic Spine Standardized Uptake Values (SUV) of 1.4 or Greater Than Those Patients With SUV's Less Than 1.4

18F-FLT imaging was performed serially on patients post transplant to identify the level of uptake of 18F-FLT at a day +5 to +12 scan and the day at which neutrophils recover to >500 (i.e., subclinical bone-marrow recovery within 5 days of Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT infusion)). On each image for each patient, the region of interest was drawn within each thoracic medullary space (n=12), generating the SUV for each space. The mean of these was calculated for each scan. The analysis was the median of the means of the SUV of the thorax values of the day 5-12 scan (averaged the SUV of the thorax for each patient and then took the medians of these). (NCT01338987)
Timeframe: 18F FLT scan done between days +5 to +12 and then time from that scan to engraftment measured

InterventionDays (Median)
Patients with SUV 1.4 or greaterPatients with SUV less than 1.4
Transplant Recipient515

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)

Here is the count of participants with serious and non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. (NCT01338987)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 79 months and 11 days.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Males That Did Not Receive Leuprolide for 1st Transplant10
Males Randomized to Receive Leuprolide for 1st Transplant8
Females That Received Leuprolide for 1st Transplant20
Matched Related Donors for Transplant4
Recipients of 2nd Transplant2

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of B Cells at One Year Post-transplant in Participants Who Did/Did Not Receive Leuprolide Following Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)

B cell percentage is defined as the percentage of lymphocytes that are B cells. (NCT01338987)
Timeframe: after first Bone Marrow Transplant, approximately 12 months post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of cells (Median)
Males that received leuprolideMales that did not receive leuprolideFemales who all received leuprolide
Transplant Recipient22.121.914.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants That Experience One Year Relapse Free Survival After Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)

To assess relapse free survival in participants undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) using the Thomas Jefferson University 2 step approach with an extra day inserted between the donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and administration of cyclophosphamide. (NCT01341301)
Timeframe: 1 year after undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Allogeneic HSCT5

[back to top]

Patient Survival

in cyclosporine group 96.4 +/- 2.8%; in tacrolimus group 96.3 +/- 3.4% (NCT01346397)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cyclosporine Group96.4
Tacrolimus Group96.3

[back to top]

Graft Survival

in cyclosporine group 84.6 +/- 5.8%; in tacrolimus group 86.2 +/- 4.1% (NCT01346397)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cyclosporine Group84.6
Tacrolimus Group86.2

[back to top]

Disease-Free Survival (DFS)

1-year post-transplant disease free survival (DFS), defined as success if a patient is alive and disease free at 1-year post-transplant. (NCT01350245)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
TJU 2 Step Regimen78.6

[back to top]

Probability of Overall Survival at 15 Months Post-treatment

Probability of overall survival at 15 months post-treatment, defined as success if a patient is alive 1-year post-transplant. (NCT01350245)
Timeframe: 15 months

Interventionpercentage of probability (Number)
TJU 2 Step Regimen85

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Molecular Complete Remission at 3 Month Post Transplant

Molecular Complete Remission is defined as participant alive and engrafted with molecular complete remission 100 days post transplant where molecular complete response is no BCR-ABL transcripts detected and engraftment is defined as the evidence of donor derived cells (more than 95%) by chimerism studies in the presence of neutrophil recovery by day 28 post stem cell infusion. (NCT01390402)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 4 months post-transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NK Infusion + Chemotherapy3

[back to top]

Type of Treatment of Rejection

"Upon having a biopsy performed, persons often receive treatment for rejection based on the results of the biopsy, which may or may not have shown signs of rejection. Details of biopsy findings and corresponding treatment are presented here for each instance of treatment for rejection. Acronyms and abbreviations are defined below.~ACR=Acute Cellular Rejection ATG=Anti-thymocyte globulin therapy Chr. AMR=Chronic Antibody Mediated Rejection Gd.=Grade IFTA=Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy IVIG=Intravenous Immunoglobulin therapy.~Only 'for cause' biopsies were performed post-transplant; thus, it is possible for a participant to be included in the analysis population and not have a biopsy for this outcome measure." (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

,,
InterventionBiopsy (Number)
Borderline rejection; IVIG and plasmapheresisACR Gd. IA + Chr. AMR + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse SteroidsACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. II; Pulse SteroidsACR Gd. IIB; ATG and Pulse SteroidsBorderline + IFTA Gd. I; with Pulse SteroidsACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse SteroidsACR Gd. IIA; Pulse SteroidsACR Gd. IIA + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse SteroidsACR Gd. IIB + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse Steroids
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept011100000
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus100000000
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac000011121

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO

"New onset diabetes is the development of diabetes post-kidney transplant. It was identified by the clinical sites caring for each participant and reported directly in the clinical database. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) is a determination made by referencing glucose measurements obtained from a standard chemistry panel. Any fasting glucose measure that is between 110 and 125 mg/dL is classified as IFG.~Acronyms: American Diabetes Association (ADA); World Health Organization (WHO)." (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Week 52

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
New onset diabetes during first 52 weeksImpaired fasting glucose at week 52
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept00
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus01
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac00

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 Criteria

Acute cellular rejection is when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade ≥ IA by Banff 2007 criteria. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus0
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept2
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac4

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) is defined as diffusely positive staining for C4d, presence of circulating anti-donor antibodies and morphologic evidence of acute tissue injury. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus0
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept1
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac0

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-Transplant

Biopsy proven acute rejection was defined as histologic evidence of borderline or higher cellular rejection per local pathologist. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus3
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept2
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac5

[back to top]

Count of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplant

CAN/IFTA grades were determined per local pathology interpretations of biopsy tissue. These grades reflect the severity of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present in the tissue obtained during a kidney biopsy. Higher grades indicate greater severity in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present the kidney biopsy tissue. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept3
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac5

[back to top]

Count of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 52

The presence of antibodies reactive to Histocompatibility Antigen (HLA) molecules expressed on the renal allograft have been associated with both acute and chronic injury to the transplanted kidney. The development of de novo anti- donor HLA antibodies may mean a person is more likely to reject the graft. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus0
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept0
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac0

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-Transplant

Delayed graft function is defined as dialysis in the first week on one or more occasions for any indication other than the treatment of acute hyperkalemia in the setting of otherwise acceptable renal function (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Any time within the first week post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus0
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept2
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac0

[back to top]

Count of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events

"Viral infections following renal transplantation is a significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples.~Acronym: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)" (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus0
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept0
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac0

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse Events

Infections of certain types (i.e., excluding those identified in the protocol as occurring commonly in this study population) were required to be reported as a serious adverse event if they required either inpatient hospitalization of prolongation of a current hospitalization. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus2
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept2
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac1

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Rejection

The number of participants who were treated by their local physician for any type of rejection including, but not limited to cellular rejection and antibody- mediated rejection of the transplanted kidney regardless of the presence of a biopsy. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept3
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac5

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 52

Treated diabetes is defined as the receipt of oral medication or insulin for >14 days between 14 days and 52 weeks post-transplant (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Day 14 to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept0
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac1

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 52

Anti-hypertensive medications are a class of drugs that are used to treat hypertension. The medications seek to prevent the complications of high blood pressure, such as stoke and myocardial infarction. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus3
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept3
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac7

[back to top]

Mean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52

GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥ 90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus55.9
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept51.6
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac58.3

[back to top]

Number of Events of Death or Graft Loss

This measure counts deaths and graft loss occurring at any point post transplantation. Graft loss is defined as need for dialysis for greater than 30 days duration, allograft nephrectomy, or retransplantation. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

InterventionEvents (Number)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus2
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept3
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac0

[back to top]

Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant

"The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease are defined using the participant's GFR value as indicated below:~Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥90; Stage 2 if GFR value is ≥60 and < 90; Stage 3A if 45 ≤GFR < 60; Stage 3B if 30 ≤ GFR < 45; Stage 4 if 15 ≤GFR < 30;l Stage 5 if GFR < 15.~Stage 1 means kidney function is normal. Stage 2 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Stages 3A and 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Stage 4 indicates severely reduced kidney function. Stage 5 indicates very severe or end stage kidney failure." (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 52 - Stage 1Week 52 - Stage 2Week 52 - Stage 3AWeek 52 - Stage 3BWeek 52 - Stage 4Week 104 - Stage 1Week 104 - Stage 2Week 104 - Stage 3AWeek 104 - Stage 3BWeek 104 - Stage 4Week 156 - Stage 1Week 156 - Stage 2Week 156 - Stage 3AWeek 156 - Stage 3BWeek 156 - Stage 4
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept011011010001100
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus013000111001110
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac033101321005110

[back to top]

Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52

"Acute cellular rejection is when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade ≥ IA by Banff 2007 criteria. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Originally, this endpoint was worded as The severity of first and highest acute cellular rejection within the first 52 weeks. But since the highest grade for each subject coincided with the first ACR episode for each subject, only a summary of severity of the first episode is presented here." (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Transplantation through Week 52

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade IAGrade IBGrade IIAGrade IIBGrade III
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept10010
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus00000
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac10210

[back to top]

Count of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse Events

"Viral infections following renal transplantation is significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples.~Acronyms: BK Polyoma Virus (BKV); Cytomegalovirus (CMV)." (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BKVCMV
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept00
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus01
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac20

[back to top]

Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5

"The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease are defined using the participant's GFR value as indicated below.~Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥90; Stage 2 if 60 ≤ GFR < 90; Stage 3A if 45 ≤ GFR < 60; Stage 3B if 30 ≤ GFR < 45; Stage 4 if 15 ≤ GFR < 30; Stage 5 if GFR < 15.~Stage 1 means kidney function is normal. Stage 2 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Stages 3A abd 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Stage 4 indicates severely reduced kidney function. Stage 5 indicates very severe or end stage kidney failure." (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 52Week 104Week 156
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept100
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus000
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac000

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI

GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. This measure specifically looked at participants with scores less than 60. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 52Week 104Week 156
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept211
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus322
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac432

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure

Temperature of >39 degrees Celsius would be an indication of fever most often in response to an infection or illness. Systolic blood pressure <90mm Hg would be an indication of low blood pressure. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: 24 hours after transplantation

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Fever >39 degreesSystolic BP <90
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept01
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus00
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac00

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156

Lipid lowering medications are used in the treatment of high levels of fats (lipids), such as cholesterol in blood (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, Week 156

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineWeek 24Week 52Week 104Week 156
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept11111
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus54333
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac22233

[back to top]

Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156

"A fasting lipid profiles measures total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. These measurements are used in assessing one's risk of cardiovascular disease. Target ranges for each of these measures are detailed below.~Total cholesterol: 75-169 mg/dL if age ≤ 20; 100-199 mg/dL if age ≥ 21; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease~LDL cholesterol: <70 mg/dL for people with documented cardiovascular disease or metabolic syndrome; <100 mg/dL for people considered high risk for cardiovascular disease; <130 mg/dL for people considered low risk for cardiovascular disease; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease~HDL cholesterol: 40mg/dL and higher; high values indicate reduced risk of cardiovascular disease~Non-HDL cholesterol: 30 mg/dL above the target value for LDL cholesterol; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease~Triglycerides: <150 mg/dL; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease" (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, Week 156

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Tot. Chol. BaselineTot. Chol. W24Tot. Chol. W52Tot. Chol. W104Tot. Chol. W156Non-HDL BaselineNon-HDL W24Non-HDL W52Non-HDL W104Non-HDL W156LDL BaselineLDL W24LDL W52LDL W104LDL W156HDL BaselineHDL W24HDL W52HDL W104HDL W156Triglyc. BaselineTriglyc. W24Triglyc. W52Triglyc. W104Triglyc. W156
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept160.2159.0187.0142.5133.5118.8129.3151.0110.5102.586.686.6114.058.055.541.329.736.032.031.0307.8249.7187.0220.0228.0
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus141.2171.6156.0170.5183.5108.2128.0117.5129.5138.576.776.769.5100.5116.033.043.638.541.045.0158.7161.0319.3146.0115.0
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac165.6185.6157.5189.0181.7122.3129.061.0135.6136.083.483.449.0101.4106.043.356.659.053.445.7206.9115.958.0172.8156.5

[back to top]

HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measures the average blood glucose levels over 8-12 weeks, thus acting as a useful long-term gauge of blood glucose control. A value below 6.0% reflects normal levels, 6.0% to 6.4% reflects prediabetes, and a value of ≥ 6.5% reflects diabetes. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156

,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Day 28Day 84Week 24Week 36Week 52Week 104Week 156
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept5.15.05.15.34.85.25.2
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus5.35.76.96.77.05.75.6

[back to top]

HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measures the average blood glucose levels over 8-12 weeks, thus acting as a useful long-term gauge of blood glucose control. A value below 6.0% reflects normal levels, 6.0% to 6.4% reflects prediabetes, and a value of ≥ 6.5% reflects diabetes. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Day 28Day 84Week 24Week 36Week 52Week 72Week 104Week 156
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac5.85.96.57.27.68.16.67.8

[back to top]

Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model

The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (MDRD). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

,,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Week 52Week 104Week 156
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept47.869.365.5
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus52.454.249.0
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac55.760.461.5

[back to top]

Number of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Adverse events were collected systematically from enrollment through last study visit. Displayed below are counts of all adverse events per treatment group (including both serious and non-serious adverse events). Separately counts of all adverse events determined to be serious are displayed per treatment group. More detail about adverse events for this trial is displayed in the 'Adverse Event' section. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Enrollment through last study visit (up to week 156)

,,
InterventionEvents (Number)
All Adverse EventsSerious Adverse Events
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept2511
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus216
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac407

[back to top]

Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52

A blood pressure measurement consists of two numbers: the systolic and diastolic pressures. Systolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels when the heart beats. Diastolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels between beats of the heart. Systolic measures of <120 and diastolic measures of <80 are considered normal. Systolic measures of 120-139 and diastolic measures of 80-89 are considered at risk (or pre-hypertension). Systolic measures of ≥140 and diastolic measures of ≥90 are considered high. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Week 52

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 52Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 52
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept146.792.7
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus147.580.8
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac139.979.3

[back to top]

The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine

The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. An estimate of the slope, or change over time, in eGFR was produced using standard statistical linear modeling procedures. The estimate was then re-scaled so that it can be interpreted as a change in eGFR per month. Positive numbers indicate increasing kidney function. Larger numbers indicate greater change in kidney function. (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

,,
InterventionChange in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by month (Mean)
Week 52Week 104Week 156
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept0.620.620.69
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus1.291.271.33
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac1.070.680.48

[back to top]

Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156

This is a measure of the total number of pills a participant was prescribed on a given day (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156

,
InterventionNumber of pills (Mean)
Day 28Day 84Week 24Week 36Week 52Week 104Week 156
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept15.813.58.314.014.315.515.0
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus28.822.214.813.014.615.314.0

[back to top]

Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156

This is a measure of the total number of pills a participant was prescribed on a given day (NCT01436305)
Timeframe: Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156

InterventionNumber of pills (Mean)
Day 28Day 84Week 24Week 36Week 52Week 72Week 104Week 156
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac27.321.316.617.017.816.014.812.7

[back to top]

Evaluation of Hand Tremor and Stable Kidney Transplant Patients When Switched From Prograf to LCP-Tacro.

"The primary efficacy endpoint is the mean change from baseline (ie Day 7) in the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Clinical Rating Scale (FTM) for overall tremor score 7 days after (ie, Day 14) LCP-Tacro conversion.~The overall FTM score was 0 to 100 where higher scores denoted worst/more severe tremor.~Below the mean total score and standard deviation for each treatment is given in addition to the mean change." (NCT01438710)
Timeframe: 14 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Total score day 7 (Prograf)Total score day 14 (LCP-Tacro)Mean change
LCP-Tacro25.3019.96-5.35

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Number of events with progression free survival. (Progression is defined as more than 5% blast in the peripheral blood or bone marrow biopsy.) or expired from treatment related mortality post transplant. (NCT01471444)
Timeframe: From day of transplant to disease of progression or death of any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 years

InterventionNumber of events (Number)
Arm A (Flu+Bu)69
Arm B (Flu+Clo+Bu)61

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Post Transplant at 1, 3 and 5 Years

Number of participants in the study who are alive and disease free at 1, 3 and 5 years post transplant. (NCT01471444)
Timeframe: Post transplant after 1, 3 and 5 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1 Year Post Transplant3 Year Post Transplant5 Year Post Transplant
Arm A (Flu+Bu)836964
Arm B (Flu+Clo+Bu)826963

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Non Relapse Mortality at 100 Day Post Transplant

Number of participants expired from complications other than relapsed disease at 100 day Post Transplant. (NCT01471444)
Timeframe: 100 day Post Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (Flu+Bu)3
Arm B (Flu+Clo+Bu)6

[back to top]

Number of Participants in the Study Who Are With no Grade 3 or 4 Acute Graft-versus-host Disease at Any Time During the First 100 Days Post Transplant.

Number of participants in the study who are with no Grade 3 or 4 acute graft-versus-host disease at any time during the first 100 days post transplant. (NCT01471444)
Timeframe: 100 days post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (Flu+Bu)125
Arm B (Flu+Clo+Bu)115

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Percentage of participants alive at 3 years. (NCT01490723)
Timeframe: From date of treatment to date of relapse or death, up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Yttrium-90 Ibritumomab + Chemo14

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment

Neutrophil engraftment will be defined as first of three consecutive days with ANC ≥ 0.5 x 109/L post-conditioning regimen induced nadir. Similarly platelet engraftment is defined as first day of platelet count ≥ 20,000 x 109/L, without transfusion for 7 consecutive days. (NCT01491958)
Timeframe: weekly for 12 weeks, 100 days, 6 months, and 12 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Neutrophil engraftmentPlatelet engraftment
Patients1814

[back to top]

Safety of Atorvastatin in Transplant Recipients in Terms of Adverse Events and Toxicities.

Adverse events and toxicities were monitored in patients using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 criteria. (NCT01491958)
Timeframe: Patients: Baseline, weekly for 9 weeks and then on days 84, 91-100, 180 and 365. Donors: at apheresis and then 30 days later.

Interventionpatients (Number)
Grade 2 elevated liver enzymesGrade 4 elevated liver enzymes
Patients21

[back to top]

Non Relapse Mortality (NRM) at One Year

Cumulative incidence of NRM will be calculated as the time from transplant until death not related to disease, where the competing risk for NRM was death due to disease. Patients who had not died were censored at last follow up. (NCT01491958)
Timeframe: up to 12 months post transplant

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Patients5.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD)

cGVHD occurring anytime after day 100 post transplant will be termed chronic GVHD, and evaluated in patients who were followed for at least 100 days without early progression or death. Grading of cGVHD was done using the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project Criteria (NCT01491958)
Timeframe: up 1 year post transplant

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Patients43

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grades II to IV aGVHD at Day +100 of Atorvastatin Administration

The incidence of grades II to IV aGVHD at day +100 of atorvastatin administration. The grading of aGVHD and cGVHD were done using the Consensus Conference criteria. (NCT01491958)
Timeframe: Up through day 100 following transplant

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Patients30

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants in the Experimental Arm Off Tacrolimus

Participants in the 'Randomized to Tacrolimus Withdrawal' group were considered fully withdrawn once they no longer received any doses of tacrolimus. Participants met this endpoint if they did not resume taking tacrolimus as of 18 months post randomization with stable allograft function and without rejection of donor-specific antibodies. (NCT01517984)
Timeframe: 18 months post-randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Randomized to Tacrolimus Withdrawal43

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With New Donor Specific Antibodies (DSAs)

Donor specific antibodies are antibodies that are directed against antigens expressed on donor organs. These antibodies can result in an immune attack on the transplanted organ, increasing risk of graft loss and/or rejection. (NCT01517984)
Timeframe: 6 to 18 months post-randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Randomized to Tacrolimus Withdrawal36
Randomized to Control Group14

[back to top]

Estimated GFR Using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) Equation

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a test to measure the level of kidney function. In this measure, the effects of tacrolimus withdrawal on long-term kidney function was assessed by comparing absolute 24 month eGFR (18 months post-randomization) and change in eGFR from 6 to 24 months (randomization to 18 months randomization). Lower numbers indicate poorer kidney function (NCT01517984)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation, 24 months post-transplantation

,
InterventionmL/min (Mean)
6 Month eGFR24 Month eGFRChange in eGFR from 6 to 24 months
Randomized to Control Group62.368.66.3
Randomized to Tacrolimus Withdrawal56.261.75.5

[back to top]

Allograft Survival Rate

Allograft survival is defined as participants who did not need to be re-transplanted or placed on dialysis due to the failure of their allograft transplantation during the course of this study. (NCT01517984)
Timeframe: 6 to 18 months post-randomization

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Randomized to Tacrolimus Withdrawal14
Randomized to Control Group7

[back to top]

Participant Survival Rate

Number of participants who did not die within the course of this study. (NCT01517984)
Timeframe: 6 to 18 months post-transplantation

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Randomized to Tacrolimus Withdrawal14
Randomized to Control Group7

[back to top]

Incidence of Acute Rejection

Acute renal allograft rejection is defined as histological reading of borderline or greater determined by the local pathology laboratory. Participants suspected of having a rejection episode on the basis of clinical signs, symptoms, or on the basis of laboratory tests, had a renal ultrasound and underwent a renal transplant biopsy. Any detection of acute cellular rejection or acute humoral rejection resulted in participants in the 'Randomized to Tacrolimus Withdrawal' group to be restarted on tacrolimus and followed per the reduced follow-up schedule of events. (NCT01517984)
Timeframe: 6 to 18 months post-randomization

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Randomized to Tacrolimus Withdrawal6
Randomized to Control Group0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival is defined as the interval between day of transplant and day of death. (NCT01518153)
Timeframe: Every 3 months until day of death

Interventiondays (Median)
Stem Cell Transplant + Donor Lymphocyte Infusion246

[back to top]

Success Rate

Success rate defined as alive, engrafted without grade 3 or 4 GvHD or relapse at day 100 post allogeneic stem cell transplantation followed by donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). (NCT01518153)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Low Dose Donor T-Cells1
High Dose Donor T-Cells3

[back to top]

Median Time to Neutrophil Engraftment

Median time to recovery of absolute neutrophil count >=500/uL for 3 consecutive days. Summarized using standard descriptive statistics along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. (NCT01529827)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventiondays (Median)
Treatment (Reduced Intensity Allogeneic PBSCT)17

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) at One Year

Assessed using Kaplan Meier and Proportional Hazards (NCT01529827)
Timeframe: day of transplant until progression up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Reduced Intensity Allogeneic PBSCT)85

[back to top] [back to top]

Clinical Response

"Patients will be followed according to response criteria as referenced in BMT SOP Standards of Therapy last updated 2008. Clinical Response = CR + PR.~Complete Response Requires all of the following:~Serum and urine negative for monoclonal proteins by immunofixation~Normal free light chain ratio~Plasma cells in marrow < 5%~Partial Response (PR) Requires any of the following:~- ≥ 50% reduction in current serum monoclonal protein levels > 0.5 g/dL or urine light chain levels > 100 mg/day with a visible peak or free light chain levels > 10mg/dL~Progressive Disease (PD) Requires any of the following:~If progressing from CR, any detectable monoclonal protein or abnormal free light chain ratio (light chain must double)~If progressive from PR or SD, ≥ 50% increase in the serum M protein to > 0.5 g/dL,or ≥ 50% increase in urine M protein to > 200mg/day with visible peak present.~Free light chain increase of ≥ 50% to" (NCT01529827)
Timeframe: In the first 100 days from day 0 of transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Reduced Intensity Allogeneic PBSCT)45

[back to top]

Number of Participants With HCV

Number of Participants with HCV (hepatitis C virus) assessed as treatment emergent adverse events of special interest (NCT01551212)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Everolimus/Tacrolimus6
Tacrolimus12

[back to top]

Incidence of de Novo HCC Malignancies

Incidence of de novo Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) malignancies assessed as treatment emergent adverse events of special interest (NCT01551212)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Everolimus/Tacrolimus0
Tacrolimus2

[back to top]

Estimated GFR - PP Set

This was a sensitivity analysis for the primary outcome measure based on the per-protocol set of patients. (NCT01551212)
Timeframe: month 12

InterventionmL/min (Mean)
Everolimus/Tacrolimus74.83
Tacrolimus70.65

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or Death

Percentage of Participants with Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss or Death at Month 12 (NCT01551212)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionPercent of Patients (Number)
Everolimus/Tacrolimus9.5
Tacrolimus7.9

[back to top]

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

The estmated GFR was calculated using MDRD-4 formula (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group). (NCT01551212)
Timeframe: month 12

InterventionmL/min (Mean)
Everolimus/Tacrolimus73.46
Tacrolimus71.95

[back to top] [back to top]

Disease Activity

Evaluated using a standardized tool for evaluating CD (CDAI). (NCT01570348)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic BMT)0

[back to top]

Quality of Life Measured Using the Previously Validated Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire

(NCT01570348)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic BMT)0

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Development of Infectious Complications

The incidence of definite and probable viral, fungal and bacterial infections will be tabulated for each patient. (NCT01570348)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic BMT)1

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS)

Defined as alive and free of active CD. Described graphically using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. Generated with confidence intervals using Greenwood's formula to calculate the standard error. Estimated with exact 90% confidence intervals. (NCT01570348)
Timeframe: At 1 year post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic BMT)1

[back to top]

Incidence and Severity of GVHD

The grading of acute and chronic GVHD will follow previously published guidelines but will also include capture of symptoms and characterization of alternative causes. The highest level of organ abnormalities, the etiologies contributing to the abnormalities and biopsy results pertaining to GVHD will be identified. Since both GVHD and CD involve the gastrointestinal tract, all diagnostic biopsies of these organs will be reviewed by pathologists experienced in the diagnosis of GVHD and IBD, respectively. (NCT01570348)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic BMT)1

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Characterized by the event rates as functions of all patients enrolled and at risk of the event, with exact confidence intervals. (NCT01570348)
Timeframe: Time of treatment assignment until death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic BMT)1

[back to top]

EFS

Described graphically using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. Generated with confidence intervals using Greenwood's formula to calculate the standard error. Estimated with exact 90% confidence intervals. (NCT01570348)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic BMT)1

[back to top]

Incidence of Disease-modifying Drugs for CD Initiated Post-transplant

Includes the administration of any therapy (drugs, biologics, or any other treatments) clearly given as immunomodulatory therapy for underlying CD. (NCT01570348)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic BMT)0

[back to top]

Incidence of Graft Rejection

Engraftment is defined as achieving > 5% donor peripheral blood CD3 T cell chimerism by day 84 after HCT. Primary graft failure is defined as a donor peripheral blood CD3 T cell chimerism peak of < 5% by Day 84 post-HCT. Secondary graft failure is defined as documented engraftment followed by loss of the graft with donor peripheral blood CD3 T cell chimerism < 5% as demonstrated by a chimerism assay. (NCT01570348)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic BMT)0

[back to top]

Non-Relapse Mortality Rate (NRM)

Number of participants expired within the first 100 days after transplant not due to relapsed disease. (NCT01572662)
Timeframe: 100 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 16,000 Umol/l2
Arm 2: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 20,000umol/l.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Number of participants that are disease free and alive one year post transplant. (NCT01572662)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 16,000 Umol/l29
Arm 2: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 20,000umol/l.93

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Number of participants that were diseased free and alive 3 years post-transplant. (NCT01572662)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 16,000 Umol/l16
Arm 2: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 20,000umol/l.47

[back to top]

Growth Development - Weight at Baseline and Month 12

"Individual growth measurements were compared with the gender and age-specific growth percentiles in the CDC growth charts for the US population. Each value observed is thus represented by the (approximated) percentage of subjects with a lower value in the reference population. Changes were calculated on this scale and thus express the change in growth measurements relative to the percentiles in the CDC growth charts.~Patients were classified into growth percentile categories (<=5, >5-25, >25-50, >50-75, >75-95 and >95% percentile)." (NCT01598987)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

,,,,,,
InterventionPercentages (Number)
DecreaseNo ChangeIncrease >3 to 5%Increase >5 to 10%Increase >10%
<=5% Percentile0.033.30.026.740.0
>25% - 50% Percentile42.90.00.00.057.1
>5% - 25% Percentile20.020.00.00.060.0
>50% - 75% Percentile72.718.20.09.10.0
>75% - 95% Percentile16.733.316.70.033.3
>95% Percentile0.0100.00.00.00.0
Total28.024.02.010.036.0

[back to top]

Growth Development - Weight at Baseline and Month 24

"Individual growth measurements were compared with the gender and age-specific growth percentiles in the CDC growth charts for the US population. Each value observed is thus represented by the (approximated) percentage of subjects with a lower value in the reference population. Changes were calculated on this scale and thus express the change in growth measurements relative to the percentiles in the CDC growth charts.~Patients were classified into growth percentile categories (<=5, >5-25, >25-50, >50-75, >75-95 and >95% percentile)." (NCT01598987)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

,,,,,
InterventionPercentages (Number)
DecreaseNo ChangeIncrease >3 to 5%Increase >5 to 10%Increase >10%
<=5% Percentile0.050.016.716.716.7
>25% - 50% Percentile100.00.00.00.00.0
>5% - 25% Percentile40.00020.040.0
>50% - 75% Percentile12.525.012.512.537.5
>95% Percentile0.0100.00.00.00.0
Total22.727.39.113.627.3

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Failure Rates of Efficacy Endpoints

"The proportion of patients with composite efficacy failure (treated biopsy proven acute rejection[tBPAR], graft loss [GL] , death [D]) before/at Month 12 and Month 24, estimated with Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods and the proportion of patients who experienced any of the components of composite efficacy failure (tBPAR, GL, D) before/at Month 12 and Month 24, separately for each component.~AR: acute rejection; BPAR: biopsy proven acute rejection. Rate = Kaplan-Meier estimate for failure in %; CI = confidence interval for failure rate." (NCT01598987)
Timeframe: At 12-month and 24-month after start of study drug

InterventionPercentages (Number)
Month 12: tBPAR,GL,or DMonth 12: tBPAR,GL,D,or loss to follow-upMonth 12: Treated BPARMonth 12: Graft lossMonth 12: DeathMonth 12: Graft loss or deathMonth 12: BPARMonth 12: Treated ARMonth 24: tBPAR,GL,or DMonth 24: tBPAR,GL,D,or loss to follow-upMonth 24: Treated BPARMonth 24: Graft LossMonth 24: DeathMonth 24: Graft loss or deathMonth 24: BPARMonth 24: Treated AR
Everolimus Based Regimen1.91.91.90.00.00.03.73.65.99.75.90.00.00.011.97.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate - Month 12

Evolution of renal function assessed by estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) Schwartz formula (Schwartz 2009), expressed in mean change in eGFR of CKiD between start of study (baseline assessment) and Month 12. (NCT01598987)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Everolimus Based Regimen6.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate - Month 24

Evolution of renal function assessed by estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) Schwartz formula (Schwartz 2009), expressed in mean change in eGFR of CKiD between start of study (baseline assessment) and Month 24. (NCT01598987)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Everolimus Based Regimen4.5

[back to top]

Growth Development - Height at Baseline and Month 12

"Individual growth measurements were compared with the gender and age-specific growth percentiles in the CDC growth charts for the US population. Each value observed is thus represented by the (approximated) percentage of subjects with a lower value in the reference population. Changes were calculated on this scale and thus express the change in growth measurements relative to the percentiles in the CDC growth charts.~Patients were classified into growth percentile categories (<=5, >5-25, >25-50, >50-75, >75-95 and >95% percentile)." (NCT01598987)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

,,,,,,
InterventionPercentages (Number)
DecreaseNo ChangeIncrease >3 to 5%Increase >5 to 10%Increase >10%
<=5% Percentile0.068.812.50.018.8
>25% - 50% Percentile16.733.30.016.733.3
>5% - 25% Percentile26.720.06.720.026.7
>50% - 75% Percentile14.328.60.014.342.9
>75% - 95% Percentile25.050.025.00.00.0
>95% Percentile0.0100.00.00.00.0
Total14.044.08.010.024.0

[back to top]

Growth Development - Height at Baseline and Month 24

"Individual growth measurements were compared with the gender and age-specific growth percentiles in the CDC growth charts for the US population. Each value observed is thus represented by the (approximated) percentage of subjects with a lower value in the reference population. Changes were calculated on this scale and thus express the change in growth measurements relative to the percentiles in the CDC growth charts.~Patients were classified into growth percentile categories (<=5, >5-25, >25-50, >50-75, >75-95 and >95% percentile)." (NCT01598987)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

,,,,,,
InterventionPercentages (Number)
DecreaseNo ChangeIncrease >3 to 5%Increase >5 to 10%Increase >10%
<=5% Percentile0.050.033.30.016.7
>25% - 50% Percentile33.30.00.033.333.3
>5% - 25% Percentile12.512.512.50.062.5
>50% - 75% Percentile0.00.00.00.0100.0
>75% - 95% Percentile0.050.050.00.00.0
>95% Percentile0.0100.00.00.00.0
Total9.0027.318.24.540.9

[back to top]

Incidence and Severity of Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

The severity of chronic GVHD will be described. Chronic GVHD was evaluated using NIH Consensus Global Severity Scoring. The number of participants with chronic GVHD is given, organized by severity. (NCT01621477)
Timeframe: 100 days post transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No Chronic GVHDMildModerateSevere
Treatment15020

[back to top]

Disease-Free Survival (DFS)

Estimate the DFS at one-year post-transplantation. The event is defined as relapse or death due to relapse. The number of participants who did not relapse up to one year post transplant is reported. (NCT01621477)
Timeframe: one year post transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment7

[back to top]

Incidence and Severity of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

The number of participants with acute GVHD is given, organized by grade. Participants are graded on a scale from 1 to 4, with 1 being mild and 4 being severe. (NCT01621477)
Timeframe: 100 days post transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No Acute GVHDGrade IGrade IIGrade IIIGrade IV
Treatment93131

[back to top]

One-year Survival (OS)

Evaluate the number of participants alive at 1 year. The number of participants surviving to one-year post-transplantation is given. (NCT01621477)
Timeframe: One year post transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment7

[back to top]

Incidence of Malignant Relapse

Estimate the incidence of malignant relapse at one year post-transplant. The number of participants with malignant relapse or progressive disease is given. Relapse was evaluated using standard WHO criteria for each disease. (NCT01621477)
Timeframe: One year post transplantation.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment10

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS)

Estimate the EFS at one-year post-transplantation. The event is defined as relapse or death due to any cause. The number of participants who were alive without relapse at one year post-transplant is reported. (NCT01621477)
Timeframe: one year post transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment4

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Patients With Treatment Failures

"Incidence of treatment failures, assessed with composite criterion including treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR) with a rejection activity index (RAI) according to Banff classification >3, graft loss or death at 6 months.~Biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) was defined as a clinically suspected acute rejection confirmed by biopsy. The Banff Rejection Activity Index (RAI) comprises 3 components scored from 0 to 3: venous endothelial inflammation; bile duct inflammation damage; and portal inflammation; the scores are combined to an overall score (the RAI) ranging from 0 to 9. An overall score of 0-3 is considered indeterminate, score of 4-5 is mild acute, score of 6-7 is moderate acute , and score of 8-9 is severe acute. Only the episode with the highest total RAI score for each participant was counted.~The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was registered again on the waiting list, or the day he/she received a new graft." (NCT01625377)
Timeframe: At week 12 and week 24

,
InterventionPatients (Number)
week 12, Treatment failures - NOweek 12, Treatment failures - YESweek 24, Treatment failures - NOweek 24, Treatment failures - YES
Everolimus (RAD001)882819
Tacrolimus912894

[back to top]

Number of Patients Reported With Different Categories of Severity of BPAR According to Banff Classification

"Biopsy proven acute rejection was defined as a clinically suspected acute rejection confirmed by biopsy.~The severity of BPAR was categorized as :~Mild (Banff grade I, RAI = 4 and 5) Moderate (Banff grade II, RAI = 6 and 7) Severe (Banff grade III, RAI = 8 and 9) Banff Rejection Activity Index (RAI) comprises 3 components scored from 0 to 3: venous endothelial inflammation; bile duct inflammation damage; and portal inflammation; the scores are combined to an overall score (the RAI) ranging from 0 to 9. An overall score of 0-3 is considered indeterminate, score of 4-5 is mild acute, score of 6-7 is moderate acute , and score of 8-9 is severe acute. Only the episode with the highest total RAI score for each participant was counted." (NCT01625377)
Timeframe: at 12 week and 24 week

,
InterventionPatients (Number)
Week 12: MildWeek 12: ModerateWeek 12: SevereWeek 24: MildWeek 24: ModerateWeek 24: Sever
Everolimus (RAD001)110530
Tacrolimus110110

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Death or Graft Loss

The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was registered again on the waiting list, or the day he/she received a new graft. (NCT01625377)
Timeframe: at week 24

,
InterventionPatients (Number)
Graft LossDeath
Everolimus (RAD001)01
Tacrolimus11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Creatinine Clearance Estimated Using the Adjusted Cockcroft-Gault Formula

Creatinine clearance by the Cockcroft-Gault formula is computed in mL/min/1.73m^2 from the creatinine clearance in mL/min by multiplying it by 1.73 and dividing it by the body surface area Baseline was Day 28 visit. (NCT01625377)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Tacrolimus-9.0
Everolimus (RAD001)0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimated by Abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Formula

"Change in glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the MDRD abbreviated formula.~GFR in mL/min/1.73m^2 for men of non-black ethnicity: 186 * [C/88]^-1.154 * [A]^-0.023*G*R ; C = serum creatinine (in μmol/L); A = Age (in years). G = 0.742 when the patient is a women; Otherwise G=1 R= 1.21 when the patient was of black ethnicity; Otherwise R = 1 Baseline was Day 28 visit." (NCT01625377)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Tacrolimus-11.8
Everolimus (RAD001)0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimated by CKD-EPI Formula

"GFR estimated by using the Chronic kidney disease- epidemiology (CKD-EPI) formula:~eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) = 141 * min(C/K,1)^ α * max(C/K,1)^-1.209 * 0.993^A * 1.1018 (if male) * 1.159 (if black) where C = serum creatinine (in mg/dL) ; A = Age (in years); K = 0.7 for women and 0.9 for men; α = -0.329 for women and -0.411 for men. Baseline was Day 28 visit." (NCT01625377)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Tacrolimus-6.9
Everolimus (RAD001)2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Renal Function

"Change in renal function was measured by change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). GFR calculated using the abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease (aMDRD) formula.~GFR in mL/min/1.73m^2 for men of non-black ethnicity: 186 * [C/88]^-1.154 * [A]^-0.023*G*R ; C = serum creatinine (in μmol/L); A = Age (in years). G = 0.742 when the patient is a women; Otherwise G=1 R= 1.21 when the patient was of black ethnicity; Otherwise R = 1 Baseline was Day 28 visit." (NCT01625377)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Least Squares Mean)
Tacrolimus-13.29
Everolimus (RAD001)1.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Serum Creatinine

"Change in serum creatinine concentrations from baseline (randomization) to week 24 post-randomization was one of the efficacy assessments of renal function.~Baseline was Day 28 visit." (NCT01625377)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionµmol/L (Mean)
Tacrolimus7.2
Everolimus (RAD001)-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio

Change in urine protein/creatinine ratio from baseline (randomization) to week 24 post-randomization was one of the efficacy assessments of renal function. Baseline was Day 28 visit. (NCT01625377)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 24

Interventionmg/mmol (Mean)
Tacrolimus-2.3
Everolimus (RAD001)21.9

[back to top]

Number of Patients in Different Stages of Chronic Kidney Diseases According to the K/DOQI Classification System

"Kidney disease outcomes quality initiative (K/DOQI) classification is based on glomerular filtration rate (GFR), abbreviated MDRD formula (mL/min/1.73m^2) :~Stage 1 : GFR >= 90; Stage 2 = GFR was between 60-89; Stage 3 = GFR was between 30-59 ; Stage 4 = GFR was between 15-29; Stage 5 = GFR was < 15 (or dialysis)" (NCT01625377)
Timeframe: At Week 24

,
InterventionPatients (Number)
Stage 1Stage 2Stage 3Stage 4Stage 5
Everolimus (RAD001)4129400
Tacrolimus24342800

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Any Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, Death and Premature Discontinuation

Baseline was Day 28 visit. This endpoint reports patients with total adverse events (any), serious adverse events, death and premature discontinuation. (NCT01625377)
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 weeks

,
InterventionPatients (Number)
Any Adverse eventsSerious Adverse eventsDeathAt least one AE led to premature discontinuation
Everolimus (RAD001)8142218
Tacrolimus852814

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Treated or Not Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)

Biopsy proven acute rejection was defined as a clinically suspected acute rejection confirmed by biopsy. (NCT01625377)
Timeframe: at 12 week and 24 week

,
InterventionPatients (Number)
Week 12, Treated BPARWeek 12, Not treated BPARWeek 24, Treated BPARWeek 24, Not Treated BPAR
Everolimus (RAD001)2081
Tacrolimus2020

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Treated or Untreated BPAR With RAI Score Greater Than 3

"Biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) was defined as a clinically suspected acute rejection confirmed by biopsy. The Banff Rejection Activity Index (RAI) comprises 3 components scored from 0 to 3: venous endothelial inflammation; bile duct inflammation damage; and portal inflammation; the scores are combined to an overall score (the RAI) ranging from 0 to 9. An overall score of 0-3 is considered indeterminate, score of 4-5 is mild acute, score of 6-7 is moderate acute , and score of 8-9 is severe acute. Only the episode with the highest total RAI score for each participant was counted.~The patients with treated or untreated BPAR having RAI score > 3 were reported in this end point." (NCT01625377)
Timeframe: At 24 weeks

,
InterventionPatients (Number)
Not Treated BPAR: RAI score >3Not Treated BPAR: Missing RAI scoreTreated BPAR: RAI score >3
Everolimus (RAD001)018
Tacrolimus002

[back to top] [back to top]

Time-to-engraftment

The number of days until participants by dose level reach engraftment. (NCT01629511)
Timeframe: 30 days post transplant

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Day 10Day 11Day 12Day 13Day 15Day 17<10 days - Graft Failure
Gemcitabine Dose Level 11210000
Gemcitabine Dose Level 32401001
Gemcitabine Dose Level 40010110

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Will be estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier. Time-to-event distributions as function of patient baseline covariates will be evaluated using Bayesian time-to-event regression modeling. (NCT01629511)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Gemcitabine Dose Level 13
Gemcitabine Dose Level 20
Gemcitabine Dose Level 34
Gemcitabine Dose Level 42

[back to top]

Efficacy of Low-dose FK-506 in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) Measured by Change in 6-min Walk Distance (6MWD)

"Change in 6MWD in meter between baseline and 16 weeks~A large number would indicate an increase in exercise capacity" (NCT01647945)
Timeframe: baseline to 16 weeks

Interventionmeter (Median)
Placebo14.5
FK506 Level < 20
FK506 Level 2-341
FK506 Level 3-50

[back to top]

Safety of Low-dose FK-506 in PAH

Total number of adverse events measured between baseline and end of study at 18 weeks as reported by study subjects such as nausea/diarrhea, URI, sinus congestion, infection, fluid retention/edema, cough, headache, bronchitis, fatigue, drug reaction/hives, flushing, anxiety, tremor, fever, shingles, SOB, insomnia, pain (NCT01647945)
Timeframe: 18 weeks

Interventionnumber of AEs (Number)
Placebo8
FK506 Level < 218
FK506 Level 2-39
FK506 Level 3-522

[back to top]

Number of Combined Clinical Events

"Combined Clinical Events @ 16 weeks:~Number of patients who died Number of patients who got transplanted Number of patients who needed escalation of therapies Number of patients who had worsening of NYHA/WHO classification by at least 1 point Number of patients who require hospitalization for right heart failure~Low numbers would suggest either efficacy of the study drug or slowly progression of disease that is studied during the 16 week study period or short observation period or small study population" (NCT01647945)
Timeframe: Baseline to 16 weeks

InterventionCombined Number of Clinical Events (Number)
Placebo0
FK506 Level < 20
FK506 Level 2-30
FK506 Level 3-50

[back to top]

The Incidence of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss and Death Until Month 12 (Full Analysis Set) (Full Analysis Set)

The key secondary objective was to assess the incidence of individual endpoints BPAR, graft loss and death until month 6 post-transplantation. (NCT01649427)
Timeframe: baseline to month 12

,
InterventionIncidences (Number)
Biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR)Graft lossDeathComposite: BPAR, graft loss or death
Prograf®3114
Tacrolimus Hexal®2002

[back to top]

ANCOVA Model for Change in MDRD GFR (ml/Min) at Month 6, Without Replacement of Missing Values

MDRD GFR (NCT01649427)
Timeframe: least square (LS) mean change from baseline to Month 6

Intervention(ml/min) (Least Squares Mean)
Tacrolimus Hexal®46.20
Prograf®38.52

[back to top]

ANCOVA Model for Change in Cockcroft-Gault GFR (ml/Min) at Month 6, Without Replacement of Missing Values

change in Cockcroft-Gault GFR (NCT01649427)
Timeframe: least square (LS) mean change from baseline to Month 6

Intervention(ml/min) (Least Squares Mean)
Tacrolimus Hexal®60.45
Prograf®46.45

[back to top]

ANCOVA Model for Change in CKD-EPI GFR (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Glomerular Filtration Rate) at Month 6 Post-transplantation

ANCOVA model for change in CKD-EPI Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)[ml/min] without replacement of missing values (NCT01649427)
Timeframe: baseline to Month 6

InterventionmL/min (Least Squares Mean)
Tacrolimus Hexal®48.33
Prograf®39.77

[back to top]

ANOVA for Dose-normalized Tacrolimus 12-h-AUC (h/103*L) at Month 1

Compares the PK of Tacrolimus Hexal® assessed by the ratio of the AUC0-12h over one month period post transplantation vs. Prograf® in renal transplant patients (NCT01649427)
Timeframe: end of month 1

,
Interventionh/10^3*L (Least Squares Mean)
Adjusted, log-transformed Estimates (ANOVA)Adjusted, back-transformed Estimates (ANOVA)
Prograf®3.02020.484
Tacrolimus Hexal®2.94418.991

[back to top]

ANCOVA Model for Change in Nankivell GFR (mL/Min) at Month 6, Without Replacement of Missing Values (Full Analysis Set)

"Change in Nankivell glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from baseline to 6 months~Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR): The GFR is the best clinical estimate of renal function in health and disease, and correlates well with the clinical severity of renal function disturbances. Several studies have shown that in patients with progressive renal disease, GFR declines or reciprocal serum creatinine levels elevate linearly over time in a predictable manner. With the help of the serum creatinine values, the GFR was calculated via Nankivell formula." (NCT01649427)
Timeframe: baseline to month 6

InterventionmL/min (Least Squares Mean)
Tacrolimus Hexal®47.65
Prograf®38.60

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Incidence of BK Nephropathy

The number of people with incidence of BK Nephropathy in each of the two Arms (NCT01649609)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months from randomization

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard Immunosuppression Reduction Arm3
mTOR Substitution Arm1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With BK Viral Load <600 Copies/mL

A Viral load of <600 copies/mL for at least 3 months indicates sustained clearance of BK viremia, confirmed by blood test (NCT01649609)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months from enrollment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard Immunosuppression Reduction Arm13
mTOR Substitution Arm17

[back to top]

Number Of Participants With Chronic Rejection Who Met Primary Combined End-point

Treatment failure defined as: BOS progression (> 20% decline lung function), re-transplant, or death (NCT01650545)
Timeframe: approximately 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Liposomal Aerosol Cyclosporine2
Conventional Oral Immune Suppression5

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 5 Years Follow-up

Number of participants surviving at 5 year follow-up (NCT01650545)
Timeframe: 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Liposomal Aerosol Cyclosporine5
Conventional Oral Immune Suppression0

[back to top]

Cytokine Analysis From BAL Fluid in Lung

Multiple cytokines were assessed as markers of lung inflammation that may be used in addition to biopsy data, collected per patient as clinically indicated during the follow-up interval. Values are reported as mean change from baseline in each group, per week (NCT01650545)
Timeframe: baseline to approximately 1 year

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
lL-1betaIL-2IL-6IL-8IL-10IL-17TNF-alphaIFN-gamma
Conventional Oral Immune Suppression3.3-0.36.337.50.10.1-1.70
Liposomal Aerosol Cyclosporine-2-0.9-2.013.60.10.41.90.5

[back to top]

Change in T Cell & B Cell Generation

Evaluate the change in regulatory T cell generation and review the relationship of the newly generated T cells with their function in the two maintenance immunosuppressive regimens at baseline, 3 and 12 months post-transplant. (NCT01653847)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months, and 12 months post-transplant

,
InterventionMean % of Treg cells in peripheral blood (Mean)
Baseline3 Months12 Months
Group 1: Tacrolimus With MMF.1.050.80.81
Group 2: Tacrolimus With Everolimus0.931.121.18

[back to top]

Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

Evaluate the change in graft function (as measured by GFR) at 12 months post-transplant from baseline. (NCT01653847)
Timeframe: 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-transplant

,
Interventionml/minutes per 1.73 meters^2 (Mean)
3 months6 months12 months
Group 1: Tacrolimus With MMF.636465
Group 2: Tacrolimus With Everolimus666472

[back to top]

Patient Survival

The number of patients who were alive at 2 years post transplant (NCT01653847)
Timeframe: baseline - 24 months post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 1: Tacrolimus With MMF.20
Group 2: Tacrolimus With Everolimus20

[back to top]

Acute Rejection

Number of subjects who experience acute rejection of the renal allograft. (NCT01653847)
Timeframe: 12 months post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 1: Tacrolimus With MMF.4
Group 2: Tacrolimus With Everolimus0

[back to top]

Renal Allograft Survival

The number of subjects with renal allograft survival. (NCT01653847)
Timeframe: 12 months post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 1: Tacrolimus With MMF.20
Group 2: Tacrolimus With Everolimus20

[back to top]

Clinical Adverse Events

The effect of pharmacogenetic dosing of tacrolimus for 48 hours on the frequency clinical adverse effects over 30±3 days. (NCT01655563)
Timeframe: Over 30 days, +/- 3 days

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Standard Dosing Arm71
Pharmacogenetic Arm121

[back to top]

Time to Maintain Stable Therapeutic Trough Concentrations

Defined as two consecutive concentrations at least 48 hours apart in the therapeutic range without any changes in tacrolimus dose (NCT01655563)
Timeframe: From Baseline to 30 days post-dose

Interventiondays (Median)
Standard Dosing ArmNA
Pharmacogenetic Arm18

[back to top]

Time to Achieve Therapeutic Tacrolimus Drug Concentrations

The primary outcome (efficacy) was time to achieve therapeutic tacrolimus trough concentrations (NCT01655563)
Timeframe: From Baseline to 30 days post-dose

InterventionDays (Median)
Standard Dosing Arm4.7
Pharmacogenetic Arm3.4

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (AUC) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation

The pharmacokinetic parameter (AUC) was evaluated on Day 1 in adult de novo kidney recipients. Samples were collected from 0 to 24 hours post dose. (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 1 days

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
LCP-Tacro382.72
Prograf147.82

[back to top]

Daytime, Nighttime Overnight Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) on Day 28.

"At selected sites, a 24-hour measurement of blood pressure will be performed to assess the variability (ei, nighttime dipping) between the two Groups at Day 28." (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 28 days

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Daytime SBPNighttime SBPOvernight SBP
LCP-Tacro139.05137.18136.11
Prograf130.84129.09127.70

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (Fluctuation) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation

The pharmacokinetic parameter (Fluctuation) was evaluated on Day 14 in adult de novo kidney recipients. (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 14 days

InterventionPercentage of fluctuation (Mean)
LCP-Tacro126.86
Prograf114.73

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (AUC) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation

The pharmacokinetic parameter (AUC) was evaluated on Day 28 in adult de novo kidney recipients. Samples were collected from 0 to 24 hours post dose. (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
LCP-Tacro357.39
Prograf205.79

[back to top]

Ratio of Nighttime to Daytime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) on Day 14.

"At selected sites, a 24-hour measurement of blood pressure will be performed to assess the variability (ei, nighttime dipping) between the two Groups at Days 14." (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 14 days

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Night:Day ratio SBPOvernight:Day Ratio SBP
LCP-Tacro0.991.00
Prograf1.011.01

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (Tmax) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation

The pharmacokinetic parameter (Tmax) was evaluated on Day 1 in adult de novo kidney recipients. (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 1 days

Interventionhour (Mean)
LCP-Tacro11.26
Prograf7.39

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (Tmax) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation

The pharmacokinetic parameter (Tmax) was evaluated on Day 14 in adult de novo kidney recipients. (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 14 days

Interventionhour (Mean)
LCP-Tacro7.03
Prograf5.03

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (AUC) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation

The pharmacokinetic parameter (AUC) was evaluated on Day 14 in adult de novo kidney recipients. Samples were collected from 0 to 24 hours post dose. (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 14 days

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
LCP-Tacro371.43
Prograf244.63

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (Tmax) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation

The pharmacokinetic parameter (Tmax) was evaluated on Day 28 in adult de novo kidney recipients. (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionhour (Mean)
LCP-Tacro5.69
Prograf7.69

[back to top]

Daytime, Nighttime and Overnight Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) on Day 14.

"At selected sites, a 24-hour measurement of blood pressure will be performed to assess the variability (ei, nighttime dipping) between the two Groups at Days 14." (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 14 days

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Daytime SBPNighttime SBPOvernight SBP
LCP-Tacro140.96140.69140.80
Prograf131.54133.38132.54

[back to top]

Evaluation of the Short-term Efficacy of LCP-Tacro After the Start of Dosing.

The efficacy is measured by the number of treatment failures defined as all-cause mortality, Graft Failure, Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) and Lost to follow up. (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 30 days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
All-cause mortalityGraft FailureBPARLost to follow up
LCP-Tacro0020
Prograf0000

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (Cmax and C24) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation

The pharmacokinetic parameter (Cmax and C24) was evaluated on Day 1 in adult de novo kidney recipients. (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 1 days

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
CmaxC24
LCP-Tacro32.6813.32
Prograf12.975.72

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (Cmax and C24) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation

The pharmacokinetic parameter (Cmax and C24) was evaluated on Day 14 in adult de novo kidney recipients. (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 14 days

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
CmaxC24
LCP-Tacro30.089.11
Prograf18.987.54

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (Cmax and C24) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation

The pharmacokinetic parameter (Cmax and C24) was evaluated on Day 28 in adult de novo kidney recipients. (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 28 days

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
CmaxC24
LCP-Tacro32.519.31
Prograf17.386.75

[back to top]

Ratio of Nighttime to Daytime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) on Day 28.

"At selected sites, a 24-hour measurement of blood pressure will be performed to assess the variability (ei, nighttime dipping) between the two Groups at Days 28." (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 28 days

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Night:Day ratio SBPOvernight:Day Ratio SBP
LCP-Tacro0.990.99
Prograf0.980.98

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (Fluctuation) of LCP-Tacro Compared to Prograf After Kidney Transplantation

The pharmacokinetic parameter (Fluctuation) was evaluated on Day 28 in adult de novo kidney recipients. (NCT01666951)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionPercentage of fluctuation (Mean)
LCP-Tacro144.78
Prograf131.4

[back to top]

eGFR (Renal Function) at Month 3 Post-transplant

Renal function as determined by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3 months post-transplant, using the abbreviated MDRD formula. (NCT01680861)
Timeframe: at 3 months post-transplant

Interventionml/min per 1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Tacrolimus/Everolimus75.7
Tacrolimus/EC-MPS65.6

[back to top]

Incidence of Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAI) at 12 Months Post-transplant

Incidence of (biopsy-proven) chronic allograft nephropathy (CAI) [interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, using standard Banff criteria] at 12 months post-transplant. (NCT01680861)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Everolimus3
Tacrolimus/EC-MPS3

[back to top]

BPAR (Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection) Incidence During the First 12 Months Post-transplant

BPAR (biopsy-proven acute rejection) incidence during the first 12 months post-transplant. Grading is determined using standard Banff criteria. (NCT01680861)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Everolimus1
Tacrolimus/EC-MPS3

[back to top]

Discontinuance of Any Study Medication (Tacrolimus, Everolimus, or EC-MPS)

(NCT01680861)
Timeframe: during the first 12 months post-transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Everolimus0
Tacrolimus/EC-MPS1

[back to top]

eGFR (Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate), i.e., Renal Function, at 1 Month Post-transplant.

using the abbreviated MDRD formula. (NCT01680861)
Timeframe: at 1 month post-transplant

Interventionml/min per 1.73 m2 (Mean)
Tacrolimus/Everolimus82.1
Tacrolimus/EC-MPS62.1

[back to top]

eGFR (Renal Function) at 6 Months Post-transplant

using the abbreviated MDRD formula. (NCT01680861)
Timeframe: at 6 months post-transplant

Interventionml/min per 1.73 m2 (Mean)
Tacrolimus/Everolimus66.7
Tacrolimus/EC-MPS63.7

[back to top]

Graft Loss (Return to Permanent Dialysis or Death)

(NCT01680861)
Timeframe: during the first 12 months post-transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Everolimus0
Tacrolimus/EC-MPS0

[back to top]

Count of Participants Who Achieved Neutrophil Engraftment

Neutrophil engraftment is defined as the first day of three consecutive days where the neutrophil count (absolute neutrophil count) is 500 cells/mm^3 (0.5 x 10^9/L) or greater. (NCT01685411)
Timeframe: By Day 42

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant5

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Disease Free Survival

The length of time after treatment ends that a patient survives without any signs or symptoms of that cancer or any other type of cancer. In a clinical trial, measuring the disease-free survival is one way to see how well a new treatment works. Patients with leukemia involving the BM and myelodysplastic syndrome will have this done by BM biopsy and additional special studies such as cytogenetics or flow cytometry as appropriate. Patients will also have radiology studies such as plain X-rays or CT scans and/or other studies such as blood tumor markers to document presence or absence of disease as clinically indicated. (NCT01685411)
Timeframe: 5 Years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease is a severe long-term complication created by infusion of donor cells into a foreign host. Patients will be assigned an overall GVHD score based on extent of skin rash, volume of diarrhea and maximum bilirubin level. The stages of individual organ involvement are combined to produce an overall grade. Grade I GVHD is characterized as mild disease, grade II GVHD as moderate, grade III as severe, and grade IV life-threatening. (NCT01685411)
Timeframe: 6 Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant0

[back to top]

Number of Participant Who Were Alive at 7 Years Post Transplant

Overall survival will be defined as time from date of enrollment to date of death or censored at the date of last documented contact for patients still alive. (NCT01685411)
Timeframe: 7 Years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant1

[back to top]

Number of Participant Who Were Alive at 5 Years Post Transplant

Overall survival will be defined as time from date of enrollment to date of death or censored at the date of last documented contact for patients still alive. (NCT01685411)
Timeframe: 5 Years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant3

[back to top]

Number of Participant Who Were Alive at 2 Years Post Transplant

Overall survival will be defined as time from date of enrollment to date of death or censored at the date of last documented contact for patients still alive. (NCT01685411)
Timeframe: 2 Years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant4

[back to top]

Counts of Participants With Disease Free Survival

The length of time after treatment ends that a patient survives without any signs or symptoms of that cancer or any other type of cancer. In a clinical trial, measuring the disease-free survival is one way to see how well a new treatment works. Patients with leukemia involving the BM and myelodysplastic syndrome will have this assessed by BM biopsy and additional special studies such as cytogenetics or flow cytometry as appropriate. Patients will also have radiology studies such as plain X-rays or CT scans and/or other studies such as blood tumor markers to document presence or absence of disease as clinically indicated. (NCT01685411)
Timeframe: 2 Years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease by Grade

Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease is a severe short-term complication created by infusion of donor cells into a foreign host. Patients will be staged weekly between days 0 and 100 after transplantation using standard criteria used for staging. Patients will be assigned an overall GVHD score based on extent of skin rash, volume of diarrhea and maximum bilirubin level. The stages of individual organ involvement are combined to produce an overall grade. Grade I GVHD is characterized as mild disease, grade II GVHD as moderate, grade III as severe, and grade IV life-threatening. (NCT01685411)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 2-4Grade 3-4
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant4020

[back to top] [back to top]

Count of Participants With Disease Free Survival

The length of time after treatment ends that a patient survives without any signs or symptoms of that cancer or any other type of cancer. In a clinical trial, measuring the disease-free survival is one way to see how well a new treatment works. Patients with leukemia involving the BM and myelodysplastic syndrome will have this done by BM biopsy and additional special studies such as cytogenetics or flow cytometry as appropriate. Patients will also have radiology studies such as plain X-rays or CT scans and/or other studies such as blood tumor markers to document presence or absence of disease as clinically indicated. (NCT01685411)
Timeframe: 7 Years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant1

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Relapse

The return of disease after its apparent recovery/cessation. Patients with leukemia involving the BM and myelodysplastic syndrome will have this assessed by BM biopsy and additional special studies such as cytogenetics or flow cytometry as appropriate. Patients will also have radiology studies such as plain X-rays or CT scans and/or other studies such as blood tumor markers to document presence or absence of disease as clinically indicated. (NCT01685411)
Timeframe: 2 Years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant40

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Relapse

The return of disease after its apparent recovery/cessation. Patients with leukemia involving the BM and myelodysplastic syndrome will have this assessed by BM biopsy and additional special studies such as cytogenetics or flow cytometry as appropriate. Patients will also have radiology studies such as plain X-rays or CT scans and/or other studies such as blood tumor markers to document presence or absence of disease as clinically indicated. (NCT01685411)
Timeframe: 1 Year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant40

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Engraftment Failure

Graft failure is defined as not accepting donated cells. The donated cells do not make the new white blood cells, red blood cells and platelets. (NCT01685411)
Timeframe: Day 42

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease is a severe long-term complication created by infusion of donor cells into a foreign host. Patients will be staged weekly between days 0 and 100 after transplantation using standard criteria used for staging. Patients will be assigned an overall GVHD score based on extent of skin rash, volume of diarrhea and maximum bilirubin level. The stages of individual organ involvement are combined to produce an overall grade. Grade I GVHD is characterized as mild disease, grade II GVHD as moderate, grade III as severe, and grade IV life-threatening. (NCT01685411)
Timeframe: 1 Year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant0

[back to top]

Time to Neutrophil Recovery

Defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 500/ul for three consecutive measurements on different days. Will be summarized with mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range, and the change will be tested using a one-sample paired t-test at a two-tailed significance level of 0.05. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant16

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD According to BMTCTN

Will be summarized with a proportion and a 95% confidence interval. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant40.7

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Grade III-IV Acute GVHD

Determined by the standard bone marrow transplant (BMT) Clinical Trials Network criteria (BMTCTN). Will be analyzed using KM method, a Graft versus Host Disease (GVHD) grade III-IV will be obtained from the KM estimates along with 95% confidence intervals. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant27.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Remission After Transplantation

(NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant14

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Primary Graft Failure

Defined as less than 5% donor chimerism in the cluster of differentiation (CD)3 and CD33 selected cell populations at any time after transplantation. Will be analyzed using KM method. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Day 30

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, and OS will be obtained from the KM estimates along with 95% confidence intervals. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant64.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery by Day 30

Platelet recovery is defined as the first day of a platelet count greater than 20,000/mm^3 with no platelet transfusions. Will be summarized with mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range, and the change will be tested using a one-sample paired t-test at a two-tailed significance level of 0.05. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Up to day 30

Interventionpercentage with plt engraftment, day 30 (Number)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant58

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

(NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventiondays (Median)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant141

[back to top]

T Regulatory Cell (Treg)/Total Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Ratio

"Median Blood Treg/Total CD4+ Ratio at day 30 following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Comparison between study arms: Ustekinumab vs. Placebo. From NCI Dictionary: T reg - A type of immune cell that blocks the actions of some other types of lymphocytes, to keep the immune system from becoming over-active. T regs are being studied in the treatment of cancer. A T reg is a type of white blood cell and a type of lymphocyte. Also called regulatory T cell, suppressor T cell, and T-regulatory cell." (NCT01713400)
Timeframe: 30 days post transplant

Interventionratio (Median)
Ustekinumab13
Placebo11

[back to top]

Incidence of Acute Graft vs. Host Disease (AGVHD)

Cumulative incidence of Grade II - IV AGVHD to be characterized weekly from day of transplant to day 100 using the 1995 updated grading scheme for Graft vs. Host Disease (GVHD) developed by Glucksberg, et al. (NCT01713400)
Timeframe: 100 days post transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ustekinumab33.3
Placebo40.0

[back to top]

Time to First BPAR

Mean Time to first episode of BPAR (days) (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventiondays (Mean)
Group A229
Group B131.6
Group C159.6

[back to top]

Requirement of T-cell Depleting Therapy for Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)

Number of patients requiring anti-lymphocyte therapy for the treatment of BPAR rejection (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A8
Group B15
Group C0

[back to top]

# of Patients Developing Denovo Donor Specific Antibody (DSA) Post-transplant

Number of patients (%) with development of denovo DSA after transplant (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A5
Group B1
Group C5

[back to top]

# Patients Experiencing a First Biopsy-proven ACR With Severity Banff > or = 2a Grade

Number of patients with their First BPACR with a Banff grade >= Banff 2a using the Banff 2007 classification system for biopsy grading. Banff grade 2a and above is considered severe cellular rejection and includes grades of Banff 2a, Banff 2b, and Banff 3. (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A5
Group B12
Group C0

[back to top]

# Patients Experiencing a Graft Loss But Not Including Patients Who Died With Functioning Graft (Death-censored Graft Loss)

Number of patient who experienced Graft loss, not including (censored) patients who lost graft due to death (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A0
Group B1
Group C1

[back to top]

# Patients With Composite Endpoint of Either Experiencing Death, Graft Loss, or eGFR < 45ml/Min at 24 Months

Composite Endpoint of number of patients who experienced either patient death, allograft loss, or had an eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73m2 (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A11
Group B13
Group C21

[back to top]

# Patients With Composite Endpoint of Experiencing Either Death, Graft Loss, or eGFR < 45ml/Min

Number of Patients that experienced patient Death or Graft Loss or had an estimated GFR (eGFR) (MDRD) < 45 mL/min (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A9
Group B15
Group C14

[back to top]

Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection

Incidence of patients experiencing a Biopsy proven acute antibody mediated rejection (BPAMR) (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A2
Group B2
Group C3

[back to top]

Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection

Biopsy proven acute cellular rejection (BPACR) (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A14
Group B22
Group C2

[back to top]

Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection

Incidence of all biopsy proven acute rejection whether clinically relevant or clinically silent. (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A20
Group B26
Group C7

[back to top]

Biopsy Proven Mixed Acute Rejection

Incidence of patients experiencing a Biopsy proven acute cellular rejection with either DSA positive or C4d staining positive indicating antibody rejection (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A4
Group B2
Group C2

[back to top]

Delayed Graft Function

Number of patients experiencing Delayed graft function (DGF) within first week after transplant. DGF is defined as need for dialysis within the first week after transplant. (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A3
Group B1
Group C5

[back to top]

Discontinuation of Mycophenolate

Number of patients who were discontinued from mycophenolate treatment at 2 years (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A11
Group B9
Group C13

[back to top]

Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Belatacept or Tacrolimus)

Number of patients who had to Discontinue study treatment (belatacept or tacrolimus) at 2 years (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A11
Group B9
Group C5

[back to top]

eGFR (MRDRD) < 45 ml/Min/1.73m2

Patients with reduced Renal function measured by estimated GFR MDRD < 45 ml/min at 24 months (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A9
Group B8
Group C20

[back to top]

Leukopenia (WBC < 2000/mm3)

Number of patients developing leukopenia defined as WBC < 2000/mm3 (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A22
Group B14
Group C15

[back to top]

Mean eGFR (MDRD) (ml/Min/1.73m2)

Mean eGFR (MDRD) (ml/min/1.73m2) measured for all patients reaching 2 year endpoint (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionml/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Group A65.5
Group B65.3
Group C63.4

[back to top]

New Onset Diabetes After Transplantation (NODAT)

Number of patients developing New Onset Diabetes Mellitus after Transplant by one of 5 definitions; only patients without preexisting diabetes were included (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A11
Group B5
Group C12

[back to top]

Patient Death

Number of Patients who experienced death, all causes (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A2
Group B4
Group C1

[back to top]

Proteinuria UPC Ratio > 0.8

Number of Patients with a Urine protein/creatinine (UPC) ratio > 0.8 (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A11
Group B5
Group C21

[back to top]

Steroid Therapy

Number of patients on treatment with corticosteroids at 2 years (NCT01729494)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A16
Group B14
Group C9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Non-relapse Mortality

Non-relapse mortality by 1 year after stem cell infusion. (NCT01754389)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Standard of Care)11
Arm B (Experimental)15
Arm C (Experimental)6.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-free and Overall Survival

Progression-free and overall survival 1 year post stem cell infusion (NCT01754389)
Timeframe: 1 year

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Progression free survivalOverall survival
Arm A (Standard of Care)6472
Arm B (Experimental)5763
Arm C (Experimental)5770

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease

Rates of chronic GVHD 1 year after stem cell infusion (NCT01754389)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Standard of Care)59
Arm B (Experimental)55
Arm C (Experimental)55

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Incidence of Grade II-IV GVHD

The primary outcome of this study is the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD up to Day 180 after stem cell infusion. Acute GHVD is graded according to the modified Glucksberg criteria (adapted from Thomas et al., NEJM ,1975, pp. 895-90), which is based on criteria by which the provider classifies acute GVHD per its objective organ staging. Acute GVHD is assessed in weekly standard of care visits post stem cell infusion and is captured in the protocol EDC upon evaluation of clinical notes up to Day 100. Data for acute GVHD organ staging and etiologies are collected in an acute GVHD separate case report form and do not include system organ class, expectedness or attribution. (NCT01754389)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Standard of Care)33
Arm B (Experimental)31
Arm C (Experimental)21

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Relapse

Relapse relapse-cum-immunosuppression-free survival at 1 year after stem cell infusion (NCT01754389)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Standard of Care)24
Arm B (Experimental)28
Arm C (Experimental)36

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Relapse and/or Non-Relapse Mortality

Percentage of participants with relapse and/or non-relapse mortality at 18 months from registration. (NCT01773395)
Timeframe: 18 Months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Non-relapse MortalityRelapse
GVAX1730
Placebo7.737

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Acute and Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

"Percentage of participants with acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The time frame for the acute incidence is 1 year and for chronic is 3 years.Grading of aGVHD was derived by consensus grading (Przepiorka 1995). The aGVHD algorithm calculates the grade based on the organ (skin, GI and liver) stage and etiology/biopsy reported. Skin staging: Stage 1. <25% rash; 2. 25-50%; 3. >50%; 4. generalized erythroderma with bullae. GI staging: Stage 1. Diarrhea>500ml/d or persistent nausea; 2. >1000ml/d; 3. >1500ml/d; 4. Large volume diarrhea and severe abdominal pain +- ileus. Liver staging: Stage 1. bilirubin 2-3mg/dl; 2. bili 3-6 mg/dl; 3. bili 6-15 mg/dl; 4. bili>15mg/dl. Grade 4 is the worst outcome.~Chronic GVHD is classified using the NIH Consensus Criteria. 8 organs will be scored on a 0-3 scale to reflect degree of cGVHD involvement 0 being none, 1 mild, 2 moderate 3 severe. Liver and pulmonary function test results will also be recorded. Severe is the worst outcome" (NCT01773395)
Timeframe: 1 and 3 years

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 2-4 aGVHD @1yrGrade 3-4 aGVHD @1yrChronic GVHD @3yrsMod-severe cGVHD @3yrs
GVAX34164723
Placebo1205933

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 or Higher Non-Hematologic or Grade 4 or Higher Hematologic Adverse Events

Percentage of participants experiencing grade 3 or higher non-hematologic or grade or higher hematologic adverse events evaluated by CTCAE v5.0. (NCT01773395)
Timeframe: 18 Months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
GVAX3.33
Placebo0

[back to top]

18-Month Progression Free Survival

"Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 18 months after randomization. Progression-free survival is defined as time from randomization to progression of disease or death whichever occurs first. Patients with relapse/progressive disease who re-enter remission after vaccination or upon withdrawal of immune suppression alone will not be considered as having disease progression. The primary analysis will be performed using the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, i.e., all transplanted and eligible patients who receive at least one vaccination will be included in the analysis according to the treatment arm they are randomized to. Patients who have not progressed and are alive are censored at the date the patient is known to be progression-free.~Progression is defined by either morphological evidence of acute leukemia or MDS consistent with pre-transplant features~is defined by either morphological evidence of acute leukemia or MDS consistent with pre-transplant features" (NCT01773395)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionPercentage (Number)
GVAX53
Placebo55

[back to top]

18-Month Overall Survival

Assessment of overall survival at 18 months. Participants alive at last contact are censored at last contact. (NCT01773395)
Timeframe: 18 Month

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
GVAX63
Placebo59

[back to top]

Mean Percent of Planned Dose Administered

The addition of vorinostat to tacrolimus and methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis will be considered feasible if 60% or more of the planned doses are administered. (NCT01789255)
Timeframe: Up to day 30

Interventionpercent of dose administered (Mean)
Supportive Care (Vorinostat, Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)82.5

[back to top]

The Number of Participants That Experience Grade 2-4 Acute GVHD (Graft Versus Host Disease) by Day 100

"The incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD (Graft Versus Host Disease) by day 100~Grade 2 GVHD: Maculopapular rash covering 25-50% of BSA (Body Surface Area), bilirubin between 3.1-6 mg/dl, and/ or adult stool output between 1000-1500 ml/day (child between 20-30 ml/kg/day).~Grade 3 GVHD: Maculopapular rash covering >50% of BSA, bilirubin between 6.1-15 mg/dl, and/ or adult stool output >1500 ml/day (child >30 ml/kg/day).~Grade 4 GVHD: Generalized erythroderma plus bullous formation and desquamation >5% BSA, bilirubin >15 mg/dl, and/ or severe abdominal pain with or without ileus, or grossly bloody stool." (NCT01789255)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Supportive Care (Vorinostat, Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)2

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients Alive at 1 Year

The percentage of patients alive at 1 year (NCT01789255)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Supportive Care (Vorinostat, Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)76

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients Alive Without GVHD or Use of Steroids

The percentage of patients alive without GVHD or use of steroids at 1 year. (NCT01789255)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Supportive Care (Vorinostat, Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)47

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients With Relapse at 1 Year

(NCT01789255)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Supportive Care (Vorinostat, Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)19

[back to top]

Median Ac-H3 Levels in Patients Treated With Vorinostat and Patients Not Treated With Vorinostat

Median Ac-H3 levels ( depicted as a ratio of ac-H2 optical density (OD) and beta actin OD) were compared in patients treated with Vorinostat to patients not treated with Vorinostat. Optical Density is a dimensionless unit. (NCT01789255)
Timeframe: Up to day 100

InterventionRatio (Median)
Treated with VorinostatNot Treated with Vorinostat
Supportive Care (Vorinostat, Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)0.9430.679

[back to top]

Median Plasma Concentration of IL-6 in Patients Treated With Vorinostat and Patients Not Treated With Vorinostat

Median plasma concentration of IL-6 (Interleukin-6 cytokine) was compared in patients treated with Vorinostat to those not treated with Vorinostat. (NCT01789255)
Timeframe: Up to day 100

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Treated with VorinostatNot Treated with Vorinostat
Supportive Care (Vorinostat, Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)4.27.6

[back to top]

Non-Relapse Mortality Incidence

(NCT01790568)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Vorinostat16

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Alive at 1 Year

Overall survival at 1 Year. (NCT01790568)
Timeframe: 1 Year

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Vorinostat76

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients That Experience Grade 2-4 GVHD Within 100 Days of Transplant

"GVHD Staging:~Grade 2: (Skin) Maculopapular rash 25-50% BSA, (Liver) bilirubin 3.1-6mg/dl, (Gut) 1000-1500 ml/day for adult and 20-30ml/kg/day for child.~Grade 3: (Skin) Maculopapular rash >50% BSA, (Liver) 6.1-15mg/dl, (Gut) >1500mg/day for adult and >30ml/kg/day for child.~Grade 4: (Skin) Generalized erythroderma plus bullous formation and desquamation >5% BSA, (Liver) >15mg/dl, (Gut) Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus, or grossly bloody stool." (NCT01790568)
Timeframe: 100 Days

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Vorinostat22

[back to top]

The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine Post-Transplant

"The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI):~A score of ≥ 90 means kidney function is normal.~A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease.~Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function.~Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function.~Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure.~An estimate of the slope, or change over time, in eGFR was produced using standard statistical linear modeling procedures. The estimate was then re-scaled so that it could be interpreted as a change in eGFR per month. Positive numbers indicate increasing kidney function.~Larger numbers indicate greater change in kidney function." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Day 28 through Week 52 Post-Transplant

InterventioneGFR change over time (by month) (Mean)
Investigational0.1
Control-0.1

[back to top]

Count of Participant Diagnosed With BK Polyoma Virus (BKV) and Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Viremia As Adverse Events

"Viral infections following renal transplantation is a significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss.~Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples. Displayed are counts of participants who experienced BKV and CMV viremia as adverse events, diagnosed by test results from the local clinical pathology laboratory." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Transplant through Week 52 Post-Transplant

,
InterventionCount of Participants (Number)
BK ViremiaCMV Viremia
Control33
Investigational85

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) of Kidney or Pancreatic Transplant During the First 52 Wks Post-Transplant

"Biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR) of the kidney (renal) or pancreas during the first 52 weeks post-transplant. AR grading using standard Banff* criteria. For both kidney and pancreas, AR is defined as a grade ≥1.~AR for the kidney: Banff 2007 criteria. Severity of AR is graded by as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA defined as the mildest form of AR and III being the most severe.~AR for the pancreas: Banff 2011 Criteria. Severity of AR is graded as I, II, or III, with I defined as the mildest form of AR and III being the most severe." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Transplant through Week 52

,
InterventionCount of Participants (Number)
KidneyPancreas
Control21
Investigational25

[back to top]

Mean Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52 Post-Transplant

"eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI):~A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal.~A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease.~Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function.~Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function.~Scores below 15 indicate very severe or end stage kidney failure." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Week 52 Post-Transplant

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Investigational77.0
Control74.6

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Biopsy-Proven Humoral Rejection During the First 52 Weeks Post-Transplant

"Humoral rejection (i.e., antibody mediated rejection) of:~the kidney as defined by diffusely positive staining for C4d, presence of circulating anti-donor antibodies, and morphologic evidence of acute tissue injury determined by local pathology and,~the pancreas as defined by the presence of circulating anti-donor antibodies, and histopathological data including morphologic evidence of microvascular tissue injury and C4d staining in interacinar capillaries determined by local pathology." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Transplant through Week 52

,
InterventionCount of Participants (Number)
KidneyPancreas
Control00
Investigational00

[back to top]

Count of Participants With De Novo Anti-Donor Antibodies or Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Antibodies During the First 52 Weeks Post-Transplant

"The de novo development of donor-specific antibody (DSA) is associated with an increased risk of graft rejection.~The presence of anti-Histocompatibility Antigen (HLA) antibodies (alloantibodies) is associated with increased risk of acute and chronic injury to the transplant allograft." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Transplant through Week 52

,
InterventionCount of Participants (Number)
De novo DSAAnti-HLA
Control01
Investigational02

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Full Pancreatic Graft Function (Insulin Independent) at Wk 52 Post-Transplant

Participants with full pancreatic graft functions are defined as those that no longer require exogenous insulin therapy. (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Week 52 Post-Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Investigational19
Control21

[back to top]

Type of Treatment(s) Participants Received for Biopsy-Proven Renal Allograft Rejection During the First 52 Weeks Post-Transplant

"Participants are stratified by kidney biopsy results/treatment received.~In the event of a for cause renal (kidney) biopsy:~-The diagnosis of acute cellular rejection (ACR) using the Banff 2007 renal allograft pathology criteria. These criteria for renal allograft biopsies is an international histopathological classification standard. ACR is defined by a renal biopsy demonstrating a Banff 2007 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection. (Ref: Solez K, Colvin RB et al. Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions. Am J Transplant 2008 8(4): 753-60).~Acronyms and abbreviations:~ACR=Acute Cellular Rejection*~Normal*~Borderline* (criteria for ACR not fulfilled)~Gd.=Grade*~IFTA=Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy*~ATG=Anti-thymocyte globulin therapy~IVIG=Intravenous Immunoglobulin therapy~PO=Orally~QD=Daily *Banff 2007 renal allograft pathology criteria" (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Transplant through Week 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Borderline/NoneBorderline/Pulse SteroidsBorderline, IFTA-Gd. I/Pulse Steroids, IVIGACR-Gd. IA/ATG, Pulse SteroidsACR-Gd. IB/ATG, Pulse SteroidsACR-Gd. IIA/ATG, Pulse SteroidsACR-Gd. IIB/ATG, Pulse SteroidsIFTA-Gd. I/NoneIFTA-Gd. I/Potassium citrateNormal/Steroids QDNo grade reported/IVIGNo grade reported/NoneNormal/None
Control0111010001042
Investigational1000101120113

[back to top]

Type of Treatment(s) Participants Received for Biopsy-Proven Pancreatic Allograft Rejection During the First 52 Weeks Post-Transplant

"Participants are stratified by kidney biopsy results/treatment received.~Upon having a for-cause biopsy performed, persons often receive treatment for rejection based on the biopsy results, which may or may not reveal signs of rejection. Details of biopsy findings and corresponding treatment are provided for each instance of treatment for rejection.~Results summary format: biopsy results; treatment.~Acronyms and abbreviations:~ACR=Acute Cellular Rejection~IFTA=Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy~ATG=Anti-thymocyte globulin therapy~IVIG=Intravenous Immunoglobulin therapy~Gd =Grade~PO=Orally~QD=Daily" (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Transplant through Week 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ACR-Gd. I/ATGACR-Gd. I/ATG, Pulse SteroidsACR-Gd. I/ATG, Pulse Steroids, IVIGACR-Gd. I, IFTA-Gd. I/Pulse Steroids, Solumedrol,ACR-Gd. II/ATG, Pulse SteroidsNo grade reported/None
Control000010
Investigational111111

[back to top]

Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement From Baseline (Pre-Transplant) Through Wk 52 Post-Transplant

"A blood pressure measurement consists of two numbers: the systolic and diastolic pressures. Systolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels when the heart beats. Diastolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels between beats of the heart.~Systolic measures of <120 and diastolic measures of <80 are considered normal.~Systolic measures of 120-139 and diastolic measures of 80-89 are considered at risk (or pre-hypertension).~Systolic measures of ≥140 and diastolic measures of ≥90 are considered high." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-Transplant) and Days 28, 84, and Weeks 28, 36, and 52

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Systolic BP at BaselineSystolic BP at Day 28Systolic BP at Day 84Systolic BP at Week 28Systolic BP at Week 36Systolic BP at Week 52Diastolic BP at BaselineDiastolic BP at Day 28Diastolic BP at Day 84Diastolic BP at Week 28Diastolic BP at Week 36Diastolic BP at Week 52
Control158.3112.0123.8126.2126.7127.085.265.473.473.376.877.0
Investigational161.3116.9126.3136.1133.5132.082.767.072.876.676.574.2

[back to top]

Severity Grade of First Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (AR) During the First 52 Weeks Post-Transplant

"AR grading using standard Banff* criteria. For both kidney and pancreas, AR is defined as a grade ≥1.~AR for the kidney: Banff 2007 criteria. Severity of AR is graded by as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA defined as the mildest form of AR and III being the most severe.~AR for the pancreas: Banff 2011 Criteria. Severity of AR is graded is I, II, or III, with I defined as the mildest form of AR and III being the most severe." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Transplant through Week 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Kidney First Grade IAKidney First Grade IBKidney First Grade IIAKidney First Grade IIBPancreas First Grade IPancreas First Grade II
Control101001
Investigational010141

[back to top]

Lipid Profile at Wk 52 Post-Transplant

"A fasting lipid profiles measures total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. These measurements are used in assessing one's risk of cardiovascular disease. Target ranges for each of these measures are provided:~Total cholesterol: 75-169 mg/dL if age ≤ 20; 100-199 mg/dL if age ≥ 21; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease~LDL cholesterol: <70 mg/dL for people with documented cardiovascular disease or metabolic syndrome; <100 mg/dL for people considered high risk for cardiovascular disease; <130 mg/dL for people considered low risk for cardiovascular disease; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease~HDL cholesterol: 40mg/dL and higher; high values indicate reduced risk of cardiovascular disease~Non-HDL cholesterol: 30 mg/dL above the target value for LDL cholesterol; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease and~Triglycerides: <150 mg/dL; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Week 52 Post-Transplant

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Tot. Chol. Week 52Non-HDL Week 52LDL Week 52HDL Week 52Triglyc. Week 52
Control162.8112.392.747.395.4
Investigational164.2115.796.948.588.6

[back to top]

HbA1c at Baseline (Pre-Transplant) Through Wk 52 Post-Transplant

"Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measures the average blood glucose levels over 8-12 weeks, thus acting as a useful long-term gauge of blood glucose control:~A value below 6.0% reflects normal levels,~6.0% to 6.4% reflects prediabetes, and~a value of ≥ 6.5% reflects diabetes." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-Transplant) and Days 28, 84, and Weeks 28, 36, and 52

,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
BaselineDay 28Day 84Week 28Week 36Week 52
Control8.56.14.95.25.15.3
Investigational8.66.04.85.35.35.5

[back to top]

Fasting Lipid Profile at Wk 28 Post-Transplant

"A fasting lipid profiles measures total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. These measurements are used in assessing one's risk of cardiovascular disease. Target ranges for each of these measures are provided:~Total cholesterol: 75-169 mg/dL if age ≤20; 100-199 mg/dL if age ≥ 21; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease~LDL cholesterol: <70 mg/dL for people with documented cardiovascular disease or metabolic syndrome; <100 mg/dL for people considered high risk for cardiovascular disease; <130 mg/dL for people considered low risk for cardiovascular disease; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease~HDL cholesterol: 40mg/dL and higher; high values indicate reduced risk of cardiovascular disease~Non-HDL cholesterol: 30 mg/dL above the target value for LDL cholesterol; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease and~Triglycerides: <150 mg/dL; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Week 28 Post-Transplant

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Tot. Chol. Week 28Non-HDL Week 28LDL Week 28HDL Week 28Triglyc. Week 28
Control149.297.481.251.887.8
Investigational159.9112.693.147.393.2

[back to top]

Fasting Lipid Profile at Baseline (Pre-Transplant)

"A fasting lipid profiles measures total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. These measurements are used in assessing one's risk of cardiovascular disease. Target ranges for each of these measures are provided:~Total cholesterol: 75-169 mg/dL if age ≤20; 100-199 mg/dL if age ≥ 21; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease~LDL cholesterol: <70 mg/dL for people with documented cardiovascular disease or metabolic syndrome; <100 mg/dL for people considered high risk for cardiovascular disease; <130 mg/dL for people considered low risk for cardiovascular disease; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease~HDL cholesterol: 40mg/dL and higher; high values indicate reduced risk of cardiovascular disease~Non-HDL cholesterol: 30 mg/dL above the target value for LDL cholesterol; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease and~Triglycerides: <150 mg/dL; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-Transplant)

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Tot. Chol. BaselineNon-HDL BaselineLDL BaselineHDL BaselineTriglyc. Baseline
Control140.582.460.758.1107.5
Investigational142.891.066.551.8120.9

[back to top]

Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS) From Baseline (Pre-Transplant) Through Wk 52 Post-Transplant

"Fasting blood sugar (e.g., glucose) test is used to help diagnose diabetes, prediabetes, and gestational diabetes.~Reference fasting blood sugar (glucose) values:~70 to 99 mg/dL is normal~100 to 125 mg/dL is considered prediabetes~126 mg/dL or higher on two separate tests is considered diabetes." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-Transplant) and Days 28, 84, and Weeks 28, 36, and 52

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineDay 28Day 84Week 28Week 36Week 52
Control217.3100.989.796.287.291.5
Investigational183.3100.096.0106.596.098.6

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline, Wk 28 and Wk 52 Post-Transplant

Lipid lowering medications are used in the treatment of high levels of fats (lipids), such as cholesterol in blood (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-Transplant), Week 28, and Week 52

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BaselineWeek 28Week 52
Control181616
Investigational181919

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Successful Discontinuation of Tacrolimus in Recipients Randomized to the Investigational Arm

Participants achieved successful discontinuation if they were able to discontinue (e.g., off tacrolimus therapy completely) over a 4-8 weeks after tacrolimus withdrawal was initiated at week 40. (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Week 40 through week 48 Post-Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Investigational5

[back to top]

Count of Participants With the Occurrence of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

"Adverse events were collected systematically. Counts of all participants who experienced at least one adverse event (AEs, SAEs) by assigned treatment group.~Refer to the Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events tables for more detail." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: From Enrollment (Pre-Transplant) to Week 52 Post-Transplant

,
InterventionCount of Participants (Number)
All Adverse EventsSerious Adverse Events
Control2119
Investigational2220

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Event of Death, Graft Loss, or Undetectable C-peptide

"This measure counts death, graft loss, or undetectable C-peptide value (e.g., C-peptide <0.3 ng/mL) occurring at any point post-transplant and independent of each other.~Kidney Graft Loss was defined as 90 consecutive days of dialysis dependency.~Pancreas graft loss was defined as returning to exogenous insulin therapy or initiation of oral hypoglycemic agents for greater than 30 days.~Factitious hypoglycemia due to surreptitious insulin administration results in elevated serum insulin levels and low or undetectable C-peptide levels." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Transplant through Week 52 Post-Transplant

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DeathKidney Graft LossPancreas Graft LossUndetectable C-peptide
Control0000
Investigational1010

[back to top]

Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model at Wk 52 Post-Transplant

"The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (MDRD):~A score of ≥ 90 means kidney function is normal.~A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease.~Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function.~Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function.~Scores below 15 indicate severe or endstage kidney failure." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Week 52 Post-Transplant

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Investigational68.7
Control67.0

[back to top]

Count of Participants Diagnosed With Malignancy as an Adverse Event

An increased risk/incidence of malignancy is a recognized complication of immunosuppression in recipients of organ transplants. In Phase 3 clinical trials, overall malignancy rates were similar across all treatment groups, with the exception of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD).Displayed are counts of all participants who experienced malignancy reported as an adverse event. (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Transplant through Week 52 Post-Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Investigational0
Control0

[back to top]

Count of Participants Diagnosed With Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Infection as an Adverse Event

Viral infections following renal transplantation is a significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples. Displayed are counts of all participants diagnosed with EBV infection as an adverse event by EBV test(s), diagnosed by test results from the local clinical pathology laboratory. (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Transplant through Week 52 Post-Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Investigational0
Control0

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medication From Baseline (Pre-Transplant) Through Wk 52 Post-Transplant

Anti-hypertensive medications are a class of drugs that are used to treat hypertension. The medications seek to prevent the complications of high blood pressure, such as stoke and myocardial infarction. (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-Transplant) and Days 28, 84, and Weeks 28, 36, and 52

,
InterventionCount of Participants (Number)
BaselineDay 28Day 84Week 28Week 36Week 52
Control19107111111
Investigational181411131313

[back to top]

Count of Participants With an Infectious Disease Serious Adverse Event(s) Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy

Infections were required to be reported as a serious adverse event if they required either inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of a current hospitalization. Displayed are counts of all participants who experienced infection(s) as an adverse event, by treatment group. (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Transplant through Week 52 Post-Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Investigational11
Control11

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Defined CKD Stage 4 or 5 at Wk 52 Post-Transplant

"The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) are defined using the participant's GFR value:~Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥ 90 (kidney function is normal)~Stage 2 if 60 ≤ GFR < 90 (mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease)~Stage 3A if 45 <= GFR < 60*~Stage 3B if 30 <= GFR < 45*~Stage 4 if 15 ≤ GFR < 30 (severely reduced kidney function)~Stage 5 if GFR < 15 (severe or end stage kidney failure).~Stages 3A abd 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function.*" (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Week 52 Post-Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Investigational0
Control0

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function at Wk 52 Post-Transplant

Delayed grafted function is defined as dialysis in the first week on one or more occasions for any indication other than the treatment of acute hyperkalemia in the setting of otherwise acceptable renal function. (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Transplant through Week 52 Post-Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Investigational1
Control1

[back to top]

Count of Participants With eGFR < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 Measured by CKD-EPI at Wk 52 Post-Transplant

"eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI):~A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal.~A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease.~Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function.~Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function.~Scores below 15 indicate very severe or end stage kidney failure." (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Week 52 Post-Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Investigational5
Control5

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Evidence of Pancreatic Loss at Week 52 Post-Transplant

C-peptide is a measure of pancreatic function. The definition of pancreatic loss: a C-peptide value of <0.3 ng/mL. (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Week 52 Post-Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Investigational1
Control0

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Evidence of Partial Pancreatic Graft Function at Week 52 Post-Transplant

C-peptide is a measure of pancreatic function. The definition of partial pancreatic graft function: a fasting C-peptide levels >0.3ng.mL (0.1nmol.L) plus the participant's continued requirement for exogenous insulin or oral hypoglycemic agent(s). (NCT01790594)
Timeframe: Week 52 Post-Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Investigational1
Control0

[back to top]

Mean Number of Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress

"The frequency of symptom occurrence and symptom distress as measured with the Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale-59R (MTSOSD-59R) at baseline, Week 6, and Months 3, 6, and 12 post-randomization.~Higher scores in the MTSOSD-59R indicate a greater symptom and symptom distress burden than lower scores." (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: up to 12 Months

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline symptom occurrenceBaseline symptom distressweek 6 symptom occurrenceweek 6 symptom distressMonth 3 symptom occurrenceMonth 3 symptom distressmonth 6 symptom occurrencemonth 6 symptom distressmonth 12 symptom occurrencemonth 12 symptom distress
Belatacept87.828.779.019.880.521.480.522.482.325.8
CNI-Based Regimen90.734.888.632.489.935.291.836.391.034.4

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline of Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) - Adjusted Change

Mean change from baseline cGFR as calculated by the 4-variable MDRD equation to 12 and 24 months post-randomization - Adjusted Change (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: at 12 and 24 months

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m² (Mean)
at 12 Monthsat 24 Months
Belatacept5.66.2
CNI-Based Regimen-0.7-1.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Heart Rate

The mean change from baseline in measured heart rate (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: at 12 and 24 months

,
Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Mean)
Change from baseline at 12 monthsChange from baseline at 24 months
Belatacept-1.8-1.9
CNI-Based Regimen-0.61.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Mean change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 and 24 months post randomization (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: at 12 and 24 months

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Diastolic BP at 12 MonthsDiastolic BP at 24 MonthsSystolic BP at 12 MonthsSystolic BP at 24 Months
Belatacept-1.5-1.7-1.6-1.3
CNI-Based Regimen-0.60.50.11.2

[back to top]

Mean Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR)

Mean cGFR by study visit, as calculated by the 4-variable MDRD equation. (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m² (Mean)
ScreeningBaselineMonth 3Month 6Month 9Month 12Month 18Month 24
Belatacept49.849.653.053.353.755.556.555.7
CNI-Based Regimen49.750.750.250.950.750.551.351.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Survive With a Functional Graft at 24 Months

Percentage of participants who survive with a functional graft at 24 months post-randomization (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: at 24 Months

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Belatacept98.2
CNI-Based Regimen97.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Survive With a Functional Graft at 12 Months

Percentage of participants who survive with a functional graft at 12 months post-randomization (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: at 12 Months

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Belatacept98.7
CNI-Based Regimen99.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline of Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) - Percent Change

Mean change from baseline cGFR as calculated by the 4-variable MDRD equation to 12 and 24 months post-randomization - Percent Change (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: at 12 and 24 months

,
InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
at 12 Monthsat 24 Months
Belatacept13.215.2
CNI-Based Regimen-0.30.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Varying Severity of BPAR

Number of participants in each severity of clinically suspected, biopsy proven acute rejection (AR) at 12 and 24 months post-randomization (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: at 12 and 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
at 12 Months71950942at 12 Months71950941at 24 Months71950942at 24 Months71950941
Moderate Acute (IIA)Severe Acute (III)Mild Acute (IA)Mild Acute (IB)1Moderate Acute (IIB)
CNI-Based Regimen2
Belatacept1
Belatacept7
CNI-Based Regimen0
Belatacept4
CNI-Based Regimen1
Belatacept2
CNI-Based Regimen4
Belatacept6

[back to top]

Slope Analysis of cGFR

Slopes of cGFR as plotted from baseline as well as from Month 3, to Month 12 and Month 24 post-randomization (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: at 12 and 24 Months

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m²/month (Number)
Baseline to 12 MonthsMonth 3 to Month 12Baseline to Month 24Month 3 to Month 24
Belatacept0.2410.2810.6850.658
CNI-Based Regimen0.004-0.159-0.112-0.277

[back to top]

Slope Analysis of 1/Serum Creatinine

Slopes of 1/serum creatinine as plotted from baseline as well as from Month 3, to Month 12 and Month 24 post-randomization (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: at 12 and 24 Months

,
Interventionmg/dL/month (Number)
Baseline to 12 MonthsMonth 3 to Month 12Baseline to Month 24Month 3 to Month 24
Belatacept0.0340.0330.008680.00814
CNI-Based Regimen-0.003-0.021-0.00203-0.00425

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With > 5% and >10% Improvement Over Baseline cGFR

Percentage of participants with > 5% and >10% improvement over baseline cGFR, at 12 and 24 months post-randomization (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: at 12 and 24 Months

,
InterventionPercentage (Number)
>5% improvement at 12 months>10% improvement at 12 months>5% improvement at 24 months>10% improvement at 24 months
Belatacept53.443.954.348.4
CNI-Based Regimen28.721.529.622.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities

Number of participants with Marked Laboratory Abnormalities (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: 24 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Hemoglobin (Abnormal Low)Hemoglobin (Abnormal high)Platelet count (Abnormal low)Leukocytes (Abnormal low)Lymphocytes (Abnormal low)Lymphocytes (Abnormal high)Neutrophils Absolute (Abnormal low)Alanine Aminotransferase (Abnormal High)Alkaline Phosphatase (Abnormal High)Aspartate Aminotransferase (Abnormal High)Total Bilirubin (Abnormal High)Creatine (Abnormal High)Protein/Creatinine Ratio (Abnormal High)Bicarbonate (Abnormal High)Total Calcium (Abnormal low)Total Calcium (Abnormal high)Magnesium (Abnormal low)Magnesium (Abnormal high)Phosphorus (Abnormal Low)Potassium (Abnormal low)Potassium (Abnormal high)Sodium (Abnormal low)Sodium (Abnormal high)Albumin (Abnormal low)Total Cholesterol (Abnormal High)Serum Glucose (Abnormal low)Serum Glucose (Abnormal high)Triglycerides (Abnormal high)Uric Acid (Abnormal high)
Belatacept0000290500005000100143140013018215
CNI-Based Regimen0010100300104013200122591017018230

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA)

Number of participants with donor specific antibodies (DSA) at Baseline/Day 1, and Months 12 and 24 post-randomization (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: at baseline, 12 and 24 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pre Existing at baselineDe Novo at 12 MonthsDe Novo at 24 Months
Belatacept1022
CNI-Based Regimen26914

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Adverse Event of Special Interest

"Number of participants with an adverse event of special interests. Adverse events of special interest include:~Serious Infections, Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD), Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), Malignancies (other than PTLD) including non-melanoma skin carcinomas, Tuberculosis Infections, CNS infections, Viral Infections and Infusion related reactions." (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: 24 Months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Serious InfectionsPTLDPMLMalignanciesTuberculosis infectionsCNS InfectionsViral InfectionsInfusion Related Reactions
Belatacept37101700513
CNI-Based Regimen4400120090

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)

"The number of clinically suspected, biopsy proven acute rejection (AR) at 12 and 24 months post-randomization~includes participants with at least one cellular and/or humoral BPAR event." (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: at 12 and 24 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
at 12 Monthsat 24 Months
Belatacept1818
CNI-Based Regimen49

[back to top]

Number of Antihypertensive Medications Used to Control Hypertension

The total number of antihypertensive medications used to control hypertension (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: at baseline, 12 and 24 Months

,
InterventionNumber of medications (Mean)
at Baselineat 12 Monthsat 24 Months
Belatacept2.12.32.3
CNI-Based Regimen2.22.22.3

[back to top]

Mean Urine Protein/ Creatinine Ratio (UPCR)

Urine protein/ creatinine ratio (UPCR) at baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post randomization (NCT01820572)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
Interventionmg/mmol (Mean)
at Baselineat 3 monthsat 6 monthsat 12 monthsat 24 months
Belatacept17.8022.8723.4229.1128.81
CNI-Based Regimen18.6120.6120.8521.6724.56

[back to top]

Percent Probability of Event-free Survival (EFS)

Probability of Event-free Survival (EFS) for Patients after 18 months. An event is either treatment related mortality (TRM), primary or secondary graft failure, or relapse/non-response (as defined in protocol section 10). Time to event is time from transplant with patients who die between the start of the conditioning regimen and transplant given a time to event of zero. (NCT01824693)
Timeframe: From transplant up to 18 months

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Arm I (Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, Melphalan)83
Arm II (Busulfan, Fludarabine Phosphate)22

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experience Primary Graft Failure Event Between Arms

Primary Graft failure is defined as the failure to achieve an ANC >= 500/uL after 42 days, determined by 3 consecutive measurements on different days; OR < 5% donor cells in blood or bone marrow by day +42 (as demonstrated by a chimerism assay), without evidence of Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia (JMML). (NCT01824693)
Timeframe: Day 0 - day 540 (18 months) following completion of stem cell transplant

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm I (Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, Melphalan)0
Arm II (Busulfan, Fludarabine Phosphate)0

[back to top] [back to top]

Percent Probability of 18 Months-relapse Event Between Arms

Probability of patients relapsing at 18 months. A relapse event is defined in protocol section 10.2.3. Time to relapse/non-response is defined as time from transplant to when all criteria of section 10.2.3 are met. (NCT01824693)
Timeframe: From transplant up to 18 months

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Arm I (Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, Melphalan)17
Arm II (Busulfan, Fludarabine Phosphate)55

[back to top]

Glomular Filtration Rate (GFR) Via Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Method at Month 12 Post Transplant

Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) method = GFR=141 x min(Scr/κ, 1)α x max(Scr/κ, 1)1.209 x 0.993Age x 1.018 [if female] x 1.159 [if black] where Scr is serum creatinine, κ is 0.7 for females and 0.9 for males, α is 0.329 for females and 0.411 for males, min indicates the minimum of Scr/κ or 1, and max indicates the maximum of Scr/κ or 1. last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for imputation of missing values, ANCOVA model (NCT01843348)
Timeframe: Month 12 post transplant

InterventionmL/min per 1.73m² (Least Squares Mean)
TAC+MPA51.62
TAC+Certican44.42
CycA+Certican42.44

[back to top]

Glomular Filtration Rate (GFR) mL/Min Via Cockcroft- Gault Method at Month 12 Post Transplant

Cockcroft-Gault formula: For men: GFR= ((140-age) × body weight in kg)∕(72 x serum creatinine in mg∕dl)For women: GFR= (0.85×(140-age) × body weight in kg)∕(72 x serum creatinine in mg/dl), ), last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for imputation of missing values, ANCOVA model (NCT01843348)
Timeframe: Month 12 post transplant

InterventionmL/min per 1.73m² (Least Squares Mean)
TAC+MPA60.26
TAC+Certican52.25
CycA+Certican51.30

[back to top]

Duration of Wound Healing

A wound will be considered healed if all the suture material and staples are removed and the wound is intact. Number of participants is based on all patients of the respective treatment group in the safety set, excluding patients with no answer (unknown). (NCT01843348)
Timeframe: Post transplant until individual reporting

Interventiondays (Mean)
TAC+MPA42.4
TAC+Certican54.1
CycA+Certican85.3

[back to top]

Glomular Filtration Rate (GFR) Via Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Method at Month 12 Post Transplant

Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) = For men: GFR = 170 x (serum creatinine -0,999) x (age-0,176) x (urea nitrogen -0,17) x (albumin0,318) For women: GFR = 170 x (serum creatinine -0,999) x (age-0,176) x (urea nitrogen -0,17) x albumin0,318) x 0.762 with urea nitrogen = urea / 2.144. last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for imputation of missing values, ANCOVA model (NCT01843348)
Timeframe: Month 12 post transplant

InterventionmL/min per 1.73m² (Least Squares Mean)
TAC+MPA53.24
TAC+Certican45.72
CycA+Certican43.47

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Wound Healing Complications During Study

Information collected to report wound healing process which included percentage of participants with complications, fluid collections detected and occurrence of lymphoceles (NCT01843348)
Timeframe: Post transplant until individual reporting

,,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Wound healing complicationFluids detectedOccurrence of lymphoceles
CycA+Certican22.227.821.8
TAC+Certican19.126.818.2
TAC+MPA14.318.711.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure Endpoints at Month 12

Treatment failure endpoints: biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) defined as a rejection which was acute and proven by biopsy, graft loss (GL) defined as: allograft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient starts dialysis and not able to be removed from dialysis or death. Patients who prematurely discontinued the study: if the patient did not suffer from an event before discontinuation and reason was not related to efficacy, the patient was assessed as having had no event, otherwise the patient was assessed as having had an event. Full analysis set (FAS) (NCT01843348)
Timeframe: Month 12 post transplant

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR)Treated BPAR (tBPAR)Graft lossDeath
CycA+Certican24.623.69.06.5
TAC+Certican12.011.56.36.3
TAC+MPA9.38.85.44.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Composite Treatment Failure Endpoints - Difference Between Groups at Month 12

Combined endpoint included: biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) defined as a rejection which was acute and proven by biopsy, graft loss (GL) defined as: allograft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient starts dialysis and not able to be removed from dialysis or death. Patients who prematurely discontinued the study: if the patient did not suffer from an event before discontinuation and reason was not related to efficacy, the patient was assessed as having had no event, otherwise the patient was assessed as having had an event. Full analysis set (FAS) (NCT01843348)
Timeframe: Month 12 post transplant

,,,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
BPAR or graft loss or deathBPAR, graft loss, death, or loss of follow-up
CycA+Certican24.632.7
CycA+Certican -Tac+MPA - Difference Between Groups14.917.1
TAC+Certican13.022.6
Tac+Certican - Tac+MPA - Difference Between Groups3.27.0
TAC+MPA9.815.6

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Viral Infections

Viral infections for BKV Virus Humane Polyomavirus 1 and Cytomegalovirus (NCT01843348)
Timeframe: Post transplant to month 12

,,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Viral infections - CMVMissingViral infections - CMVAsymptomaticViral infections - CMVMildViral infections - CMVModerateViral infections - CMVSevereViral infections - BKVAsymptomaticViral infections - BKVMildViral infections - BKVModerateViral infections - BKVSevere
CycA+Certican1.01.01.01.00.05.03.01.00
TAC+Certican0.01.02.01.00.08.07.02.00
TAC+MPA1.07.05.06.01.010.05.07.00

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Delayed Graft Function by Day

Delayed graft function (DGF) was defined as the need for dialysis within the first 7 days post-transplantation, excluding the first post-transplantation day. (NCT01843348)
Timeframe: Post transplant up to day 7

,,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
day 1 (8,7,4)day 2 (2,2,2)day 3 (5,1,2)day 4 (4,2,4)day 5 (4,5,3)day 6 (1,1,2)day 7 (2,4,0)>7 days (9,16,21)
CycA+Certican10.55.35.310.57.95.30.055.3
TAC+Certican18.45.32.65.313.22.610.542.1
TAC+MPA22.95.714.311.411.42.95.725.7

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Delayed Graft Function and Slow Graft Function

Delayed graft function (DGF) was defined as the need for dialysis within the first 7 days post-transplantation, excluding the first post-transplantation day. Slow graft function (SGF) was defined as a serum creatinine >3.0 mg/dL at Day 5 post-transplantation. Full analysis set (NCT01843348)
Timeframe: Post transplant to month 12

,,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Delayed graft function (197,187,172)Slow graft function (195,187,171)
CycA+Certican22.149.7
TAC+Certican20.348.7
TAC+MPA17.846.2

[back to top]

Glomular Filtration Rate (GFR) mL/Min Via Nankivell Method at Month 12 - Standard Regimen vs Certican Regimens

"To demonstrate non-inferiority in renal function assessed by glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell formula) in at least one of the Certican® treatment regimens compared to the standard regimen group at month 12 post-transplantation in renal transplant patients. Nankivell formula:~GFR = 6.7/Scr + BW/4 - Surea/2 - 100/(height)² + C where Scr is the serum creatinine concentration expressed in mmol/L, BW the body weight in kg, Surea the serum urea in mmol/L, height in m, and the constant C is 35 for male and 25 for female patients. The eGFR is expressed in mL/min per 1.73m². If a patient was on dialysis at the time of urea or creatinine assessment, the eGFR was set to 0. Analysis set = per protocol set" (NCT01843348)
Timeframe: One year post transplant

,,
InterventionmL/min per 1.73m² (Mean)
Month 1 - Day 1 to 60 (146,111,78)Month 3 - Day 61 to 136 (143,108,79)Month 6 - Day 137 to 228 (142,108,76)Month 9 - Day 229 to 319 (140,106,77)Month12 - Day 320 to 450 (147,111, 80)
CycA+Certican59.4762.2263.1762.8961.51
TAC+Certican60.5461.2162.7664.6863.34
TAC+MPA62.6266.3668.0569.4770.41

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function at Wk 52 Post-Transplant

Delayed grafted function is defined as dialysis in the first week on one or more occasions for any indication other than the treatment of acute hyperkalemia in the setting of otherwise acceptable renal function. (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Transplantation through Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac6
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept9
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept0

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Defined CKD Stage 4 or 5 at Wk 52 Post-Transplant

"The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) are defined using the participant's GFR value:~Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥ 90 (kidney function is normal)~Stage 2 if 60 ≤ GFR < 90 (mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease)~Stage 3A if 45 <= GFR < 60*~Stage 3B if 30 <= GFR < 45*~Stage 4 if 15 ≤ GFR < 30 (severely reduced kidney function)~Stage 5 if GFR < 15 (severe or end stage kidney failure).~Stages 3A abd 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function.*" (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac4
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept4
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept0

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection By Wk 52 Post-Transplant

Biopsy proven acute rejection definition: histologic evidence of a Banff grade of ≥1A per local pathologist. (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Transplantation through Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac1
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept10
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept4

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection by Wk 52 Post-Transplant

Antibody mediated rejection is defined by diffusely positive staining for C4d, presence of circulating anti-donor antibodies, and morphologic evidence of acute tissue injury and was determined by local pathology. (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Transplantation through Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac1
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept1
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept0

[back to top]

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Measurements Over Time

"Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measures the average blood glucose levels over 8-12 weeks, thus acting as a useful long-term gauge of blood glucose control:~A value below 6.0% reflects normal levels,~6.0% to 6.4% reflects prediabetes, and~a value of ≥ 6.5% reflects diabetes." (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-Transplant) and Days 28 and -84, and Weeks 28, -36, and -52 Post-Transplant

,,
Interventionpercentage (Mean)
BaselineDay 28Day 84Week 28Week 36Week 52
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept5.95.45.45.65.55.8
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept5.75.65.56.05.96.7
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac5.75.45.66.26.77.8

[back to top]

Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52 Post-Transplant

"A blood pressure measurement consists of two numbers: the systolic and diastolic pressures. Systolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels when the heart beats. Diastolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels between beats of the heart.~Systolic measures of <120 and diastolic measures of <80 are considered normal.~Systolic measures of 120-139 and diastolic measures of 80-89 are considered at risk (or pre-hypertension).~Systolic measures of ≥140 and diastolic measures of ≥90 are considered high." (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Week 52

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Systolic BP at W52Diastolic BP at W52
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept132.075.7
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept133.779.1
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac135.077.7

[back to top]

Total Daily Prescribed Pill Count

This is a measure of the total number of pills a participant was prescribed on a given day (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Day 28, Day 84, Week 28, Week 36, and Week 52

,,
Interventionpills per day (Mean)
Day 28Day 84Week 28Week 36Week 52
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept23.521.016.613.913.7
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept18.917.215.515.415.7
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac25.822.219.719.124.4

[back to top]

Type of Rejection Classified by Pathologist - For Cause Kidney Biopsies

"Upon having a biopsy performed, persons often receive treatment for rejection based on the results of the biopsy, which may or may not have shown signs of rejection. Details of local biopsy findings are presented here for rejection. Acronyms and abbreviations are defined as follows:~ACR= Acute T-Cell Mediated rejection~AMR= Acute Antibody-mediated rejection~Chr. AMR=Chronic Antibody Mediated Rejection~Gd.=Grade~IFTA=Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy" (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Transplantation through Week 52

,,
InterventionBiopsy (Number)
BorderlineBorderline, AMR-Gd. I (ATN-Like)Borderline, AMR-Gd.I (ATN-Like), Chr.AMR, IFTA-Gd1Borderline, AMR-Gd. I (ATN-Like), IFTA-Gd. IBorderline, Chr.AMR, IFTA-Gd. IBorderline, IFTA-Gd. IBorderline, IFTA- Gd. IIACR-Gd. IAACR-Gd. IA, IFTA-Gd. IACR-Gd. IA, IFTA-Gd. IIACR-Gd. IBACR-Gd. IB, IFTA-Gd. IACR-Gd. IB, IFTA-Gd. IIACR-Gd. IB, IFTA-Gd. IIIACR-Gd. IIAACR-Gd. IIA, IFTA-Gd. IACR-Gd. IIIAMR-Gd. II (Capillary/Glomerular)IFTA-Gd. IIFTA-Gd. II
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept00000102000110000010
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept50010214100101222052
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac31101120011000000141

[back to top]

Count of Participant Deaths or Graft Loss by Wk 52 Post-Transplant

This measure counts deaths and graft loss occurring at any point post transplantation. Graft loss is defined as 90 days of dialysis dependency. (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Transplantation through Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac2
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept0
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept0

[back to top]

Fasting Lipid Profile at Baseline (Pre-Transplant)

"A fasting lipid profiles measures total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. These measurements are used in assessing one's risk of cardiovascular disease. Target ranges for each of these measures are provided:~Total cholesterol: 75-169 mg/dL if age ≤20; 100-199 mg/dL if age ≥ 21; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease~LDL cholesterol: <70 mg/dL for people with documented cardiovascular disease or metabolic syndrome; <100 mg/dL for people considered high risk for cardiovascular disease; <130 mg/dL for people considered low risk for cardiovascular disease; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease~HDL cholesterol: 40mg/dL and higher; high values indicate reduced risk of cardiovascular disease~Non-HDL cholesterol: 30 mg/dL above the target value for LDL cholesterol; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease and~Triglycerides: <150 mg/dL; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease." (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Baseline

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Total cholesterolNon-HDLLDLHDLTriglyceride
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept167.6123.465.244.1227.1
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept159.4116.183.143.3194.4
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac167.1122.091.145.1156.8

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wk 28 and Wk 52 Post-Transplant

Lipid lowering medications are used in the treatment of high levels of fats (lipids), such as cholesterol in blood. (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-Transplant), Week 28, and Week 52

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineWeek 28Week 52
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept345
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept799
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac1389

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90 mmHg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure

Temperature of >39 degrees Celsius (e.g., 102.2 degrees Fahrenheit) would be an indication of fever most often in response to an infection or illness. Systolic blood pressure <90mm Hg would be an indication of low blood pressure. (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Within 24 Hours of transplant procedure

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Fever >39 CelsiusSystolic BP < 90 mmHg
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept00
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept00
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac00

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Week 52 Post-Transplant -Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO

"New onset diabetes is the development of diabetes post-kidney transplant. It was identified by the clinical sites caring for each participant and reported directly in the clinical database. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) is a determination made by referencing glucose measurements obtained from a standard chemistry panel. Any fasting glucose measure that is between 110 and 125 mg/dL is classified as IFG.~Acronyms: American Diabetes Association (ADA); World Health Organization (WHO)." (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Transplantation through Week 52

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
New onset diabetes during first 52 weeksImpaired fasting glucose at week 52
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept00
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept10
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac12

[back to top]

Count of Participants With BK Polyoma Virus (BKV) and Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) as Adverse Events by Wk 52 Post-Transplant

Viral infections following renal transplantation is significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during the study, using participant blood samples. Displayed are counts of participants who experienced BKV and CMV viremia as adverse events by treatment arm. (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Transplantation through Week 52

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BKVCMV
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept11
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept46
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac01

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade ≥ IA Defined by Banff 2007 Criteria By Wk 52 Post-Transplant

Acute cellular rejection occurs when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade equal to or greater than IA by Banff 2007 criteria as determined by local pathology. (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Transplantation through Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac1
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept10
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept4

[back to top]

Type of Treatment for Detected Graft Rejection

"Upon having a biopsy performed, persons often receive treatment for rejection based on the results of the biopsy, which may or may not have shown signs of rejection. Details of treatment are presented here for rejection. Acronyms and abbreviations are defined below.~ATG=Thymoglobulin" (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Transplantation through Week 52

,,
InterventionBiopsy (Number)
ATGATG, Pulse SteroidsATG, Pulse Steroids, PrografAntibioticPlasmapheresisPlasmapheresis, Oral SteroidsPulse SteroidsPulse Steroids, LeflunomidePulse Steroids, Plasmapheresis, EculizumabPrednisone
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept0200003000
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept1510009102
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac0001116010

[back to top]

Count of Participants With eGFR < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 Measured by CKD-EPI at Wk 52 Post-Transplant

"eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI):~A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal.~A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease.~Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function.~Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function.~Scores below 15 indicate very severe or end stage kidney failure." (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac21
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept15
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept6

[back to top]

Count of Participants Experiencing ≥ 1 Adverse Event (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) by Wk 52

Adverse events were collected systematically from enrollment through Wk 52, the last study visit. Provided are numbers of participants with ≥ 1 adverse event (serious or non-serious adverse events) by treatment arm. (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Enrollment through Week 52

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Adverse EventsSerious Adverse Events
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept96
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept2821
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac2119

[back to top]

Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 Post-Transplant

Acute cellular rejection occurs when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade equal to or greater than IA by Banff 2007 criteria as determined by local pathology. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Originally it was 2 endpoints but all participants' highest grade was also their first grade so only reporting their first grade. (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Transplantation through Week 52

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
IAIBIIAIIBIII
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept22000
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept31402
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac01000

[back to top]

Fasting Lipid Profile at Wk 52 Post-Transplant

"A fasting lipid profiles measures total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. These measurements are used in assessing one's risk of cardiovascular disease. Target ranges for each of these measures are provided:~Total cholesterol: 75-169 mg/dL if age ≤ 20; 100-199 mg/dL if age ≥ 21; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease~LDL cholesterol: <70 mg/dL for people with documented cardiovascular disease or metabolic syndrome; <100 mg/dL for people considered high risk for cardiovascular disease; <130 mg/dL for people considered low risk for cardiovascular disease; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease~HDL cholesterol: 40mg/dL and higher; high values indicate reduced risk of cardiovascular disease~Non-HDL cholesterol: 30 mg/dL above the target value for LDL cholesterol; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease and~Triglycerides: <150 mg/dL; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease." (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Week 52

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Total cholesterolNon-HDLLDLHDLTriglyceride
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept174.8130.894.644.0182.8
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept163.7121.286.342.4170.0
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac177.1128.6102.948.5125.8

[back to top]

Mean Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52 Post-Transplant

"eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI):~A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal.~A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease.~Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function.~Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function.~Scores below 15 indicate very severe or end stage kidney failure." (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac59.2
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept61.5
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept63.0

[back to top]

The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine Post-Transplant

"The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI):~A score of ≥ 90 means kidney function is normal.~A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease.~Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function.~Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function.~Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure.~An estimate of the slope, or change over time, in eGFR was produced using standard statistical linear modeling procedures. The estimate was then re-scaled so that it could be interpreted as a change in eGFR per month. Positive numbers indicate increasing kidney function.~Larger numbers indicate greater change in kidney function." (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Day 28 through Week 52 Post-Transplant

InterventioneGFR change over time (by month) (Mean)
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac0.3
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept1.3
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept0.8

[back to top]

Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model at Wk 52 Post-Transplant

"The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (MDRD):~A score of ≥ 90 means kidney function is normal.~A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease.~Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function.~Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function.~Scores below 15 indicate severe or endstage kidney failure." (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac56.1
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept57.0
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept58.2

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medication at Wk 52 Post-Transplant

Anti-hypertensive medications are a class of drugs that are used to treat hypertension. The medications seek to prevent the complications of high blood pressure, such as stroke and myocardial infarction. (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac18
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept23
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept8

[back to top]

Fasting Lipid Profile at Wk 28 Post-Transplant

"A fasting lipid profiles measures total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. These measurements are used in assessing one's risk of cardiovascular disease. Target ranges for each of these measures are provided:~Total cholesterol: 75-169 mg/dL if age ≤20; 100-199 mg/dL if age ≥ 21; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease~LDL cholesterol: <70 mg/dL for people with documented cardiovascular disease or metabolic syndrome; <100 mg/dL for people considered high risk for cardiovascular disease; <130 mg/dL for people considered low risk for cardiovascular disease; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease~HDL cholesterol: 40mg/dL and higher; high values indicate reduced risk of cardiovascular disease~Non-HDL cholesterol: 30 mg/dL above the target value for LDL cholesterol; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease and~Triglycerides: <150 mg/dL; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease." (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Week 28

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Total cholesterolNon-HDLLDLHDLTriglyceride
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept167.3115.082.752.3166.6
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept179.5133.5109.846.0153.3
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac169.6119.695.651.0126.4

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 52 Post-Transplant

Treated diabetes is defined as receipt of any oral medication or insulin for the treatment of diabetes for >14 days. (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Day 14 through week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac3
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept2
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept0

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy by Wk 52 Post-Transplant

Infections of certain types (i.e., excluding those identified in the protocol as occurring commonly in this study population) were required to be reported as a serious adverse event if they required either inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of a current hospitalization. (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Transplantation through Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac1
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept8
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept2

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Graft Rejection by Wk 52 Post-Transplant

The number of participants who were treated by their local physician for any type of rejection including, but not limited to cellular rejection and antibody- mediated rejection of the transplanted kidney regardless of the presence of a biopsy. (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Transplantation through Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac7
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept14
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept4

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events

Viral infections following renal transplantation, including but not limited to EBV infection, is a significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. (NCT01856257)
Timeframe: Transplantation through Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Tac0
Induction:MEDROL+Thymoglobulin, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept0
Induction:MEDROL+Simulect+Tac, Maintenance:MMF+Belatacept0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Relapse of Disease

Relapse of Disease is defined as the return of a disease or the signs and symptoms of a disease after a period of improvement. Relapse is almost always associated with the immunological failure of the donor immune system to recognize and/or respond to reemergence of a tumor. The number of participants with relapse of disease will be collected. (NCT01871441)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Haploidentical Allogeneic HSCT)2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Disease-free Survival (DFS)

Disease free survival (DFS), defined as the time to death, relapse or disease progression. (NCT01871441)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Haploidentical Allogeneic HSCT)1

[back to top]

To Assess the Proportions of GvHD Response Post-administration of AP1903.

To assess the proportions of GvHD complete response (CR), partial response (PR), mixed response, no response, and progression among surviving patients at Day 3, 7, 14, 28, and 56 post-administration of AP1903. (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: Day 3, 7, 14, 28, and 56 post-administration of AP1903

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 3 post-administration of AP190371985950Day 3 post-administration of AP190371985951Day 7 post-administration of AP190371985951Day 7 post-administration of AP190371985950Day 14 post-administration of AP190371985951Day 14 post-administration of AP190371985950Day 28 post-administration of AP190371985951Day 28 post-administration of AP190371985950Day 56 post-administration of AP190371985951Day 56 post-administration of AP190371985950
no responsecomplete responseprogressionpartial response
Transplat Plus DLI1
Transplat Plus DLI0
Transplant Only0

[back to top]

To Evaluate the Safety of Donor Lymphocyte Infusion Followed by Dimerizer Drug, AP1903 by Number of Participants With Adverse Events.

To evaluate the safety of the infusion of inducible caspase 9 (BPZ-1001) modified T-cells followed by dimerizer drug, AP1903. Safety evaluated by number of participants with Adverse events. (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: up to 3.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Transplant Only0
Transplat Plus DLI1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Assessed Post Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI): Disease-free Survival & Non-relapse Mortality, Chimerism and GVHD.

Participants to assess at 6 months post donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI): disease-free survival & non-relapse mortality, chimerism and GVHD (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
disease-free survivaIchimerism post DLIGVHD post DLInon-relapse mortality
Transplant Only0000
Transplat Plus DLI1110

[back to top]

To Assess the Incidence of GvHD Treatment Failure Post-administration of AP1903.

To assess the incidence of GvHD treatment failure, defined as no response, progression, administration of additional therapy for GvHD, or mortality post-administration of AP1903. (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: Day 3, 7, 14, 28, and 56 post-administration of AP1903.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 3 post-administration of AP1903.Day 7 post-administration of AP1903.Day 14 post-administration of AP1903.Day 28 post-administration of AP1903.Day 56 post-administration of AP1903.
Transplant Only00000
Transplat Plus DLI11111

[back to top]

To Assess Post Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) Chimerism

To assess the number of Participants with 100% donor chimerism at 6 months post donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Transplant Only0
Transplat Plus DLI1

[back to top]

To Assess the Incidence of Acute GvHD Flare After CR/PR Requiring Additional Agent for Systemic Therapy Before Day 56 Post-administration of AP1903.

"To assess participants with incidence of acute GvHD flare after CR/PR requiring additional agent (including 2.5 mg/kg/day of prednisone [or methylprednisolone equivalent of 2 mg/kg/day]) for systemic therapy before Day 56 post-administration of AP1903." (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: before Day 56 post AP1903

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Transplant Only0
Transplat Plus DLI1

[back to top]

To Assess the Incidence of Epstein-Barr Virus -PTLD or EBV Reactivation Requiring Therapy Post DLI.

To assess the incidence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated lymphoproliferative disorder or EBV reactivation requiring therapy post DLI. (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Transplant Only0
Transplat Plus DLI1

[back to top]

To Assess the Proportion of Patients Developing Grade I-IV Acute GvHD

To assess the proportion of patients developing grade I-IV acute GvHD by Day 28, 56, and 180 post DLI. (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: Day 28, 56, and 180 post DLI.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 28Day 56Day 180
Transplant Only000
Transplat Plus DLI110

[back to top]

Collection of Blood for Future Analysis of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs)

Blood was drawn and banked for future use in order to characterize immune system markers and further the understanding of the immune factors that contribute to disease progression in ALS. (NCT01884571)
Timeframe: Pre-Treatment Period (2 months prior to the start of treatment), Treatment Period (Day 1 and Months 1, 2, 4, 6), Post-Treatment Period (Months 8 and 12)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Immunosuppression Regimen31

[back to top]

Collection of Cerebrospinal Fluid for Future Analysis of Cytokine Levels

Lumbar punctures (LPs) were performed to collect cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). CSF is banked for future use to characterize immune system markers and to further the understanding of the immune factors that contribute to disease progression in ALS. Cytokines are markers of neuroinflammation and can be categorized as neurotoxic or neuroprotective. The role that cytokines play in in ALS progression is still not yet fully understood. (NCT01884571)
Timeframe: Pre-Treatment Period (two months prior to the start of treatment), Treatment Period (Months 2 and 6), Post-Treatment Period (Month 12)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Immunosuppression Regimen29

[back to top]

Mean Rate of Change in Grip Strength Treatment Compared to Pre-Treatment

Hand grip was measured using a study approved dynamometer to test the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles. The grip strength of the left and right hands were analyzed together. Grip strength was measured during the 3 month lead in period and the 6 month treatment period. A random slopes model was fit to the the lead-in and treatment periods, with a change point when treatment started. The analysis was based on the difference in slope after the change point. Grip strength is a measurement of muscle strength and declines as ALS progresses. A positive value means that scores during treatment were higher than pre-treatment scores, indicating an increase in grip strength over time. (NCT01884571)
Timeframe: Pre-Treatment Period (3 months prior to the start of treatment, 2 months prior to the start of treatment, and 1 month prior to the start of treatment), Treatment Period (Day 1 and then monthly until Month 6)

Interventionpounds change per month (Mean)
Immunosuppression Regimen1.38

[back to top]

Mean Rate of Change of ALSFRS-R Scores During Treatment Compared to Pre-Treatment

The ALS Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R) is an ordinal rating scale (0 through 4) used to determine the ALS patient's self assessment of their ability and need for assistance in 12 activities or functions. This is a validated scale, both in person and by phone, which provides a total score from four sub-scores which assess speech and swallowing, (bulbar function), use of upper extremities (cervical function), gait and turning in bed (lumbar function), and breathing (respiratory function). Total scores range from 0 (most impaired) to 48 (normal ability). ALSFRS-R was measured during the 3 month lead in period and the 6 month treatment period. A random slopes model was fit to the lead-in and treatment periods, with a change point when treatment started. The analysis was based on the difference in slope after the change point. A negative value means that scores during treatment were lower than pre-treatment scores, indicating a decline in ability over time. (NCT01884571)
Timeframe: Pre-Treatment Period (3 months prior to the start of treatment, 2 months prior to the start of treatment, and 1 month prior to the start of treatment), Treatment Period (Day 1 and then monthly until Month 6)

Interventionunits on a scale change per month (Mean)
Immunosuppression Regimen-0.24

[back to top]

Mean Rate of Change of Hand-Held Dynamometry (HHD) During Treatment Compared to Pre-Treatment

Hand held dynamometry (HHD) is a measure of muscle strength and scores decrease as ALS progresses. Six proximal muscle groups were examined bilaterally in both upper and lower extremities. Mean and standard deviation for each muscle group are established from the initial values for each participant. Strength determinations were converted to Z scores and averaged to provide an HHD megascore. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean of 0. Negative numbers indicate values lower than the mean and positive numbers indicate values higher than the mean. HHD was measured during the 3 month lead in period and the 6 month treatment period. A random slopes model was fit to the lead-in and treatment periods, with a change point when treatment started. The analysis was based on the difference in slope after the change point. A negative value means that scores during treatment were lower than pre-treatment scores, indicating a decline in strength over time. (NCT01884571)
Timeframe: Pre-Treatment Period (3 months prior to the start of treatment, 2 months prior to the start of treatment, and 1 month prior to the start of treatment), Treatment Period (Day 1 and then monthly until Month 6)

Interventionz-score change per month (Mean)
Immunosuppression Regimen-0.05

[back to top]

Mean Rate of Change of Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) During Treatment Compared to Pre-Treatment

Vital capacity (VC), percent of predicted normal, was determined using the slow VC method. SVC measures the amount of air exhaled following a deep breath. For this test, participants hold a mouthpiece in their mouth, breathe in deeply, and breathe out as much air as they can. The test was done seated in a chair and then repeated while lying on an exam table at the Screening Visit. For all other visits, this test was done while seated in a chair. This test takes 15-20 minutes. SVC was measured during the 3 month lead in period and the 6 month treatment period. A random slopes model was fit to the lead-in and treatment periods, with a change point when treatment started. The analysis was based on the difference in slope after the change point. SVC is a way to measure respiratory insufficiency in persons with ALS and SVC decreases as ALS progresses. A negative value means that scores during treatment were lower than pre-treatment scores, indicating a decline over time. (NCT01884571)
Timeframe: Pre-Treatment Period (3 months prior to the start of treatment, 2 months prior to the start of treatment, and 1 month prior to the start of treatment), Treatment Period (Day 1 and then monthly until Month 6)

Interventionpercent predicted change per month (Mean)
Immunosuppression Regimen-0.18

[back to top]

Mean Rate of Change of T-cell Subsets in Blood Treatment Compared to Pre-Treatment

Blood was collected for ribonucleic acid (RNA) and the mean rate of decline of T-cells during the 6 month treatment period compared to the pre-treatment period was assessed (blood was collected twice during the 3-month long lead in period). The precise role that T-cells have in ALS is unknown and this study aims to further the understanding of how T-cells operate in persons with ALS. T-cell measurement is a ratio where the relative expression levels of FOXP3 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) was calculated using the Comparative CT Method (ΔΔCT Method), normalizing to β-actin. Samples were obtained during the 3 month lead in period and the 6 month treatment period. A random slopes model was fit to the lead-in and treatment periods, with a change point when treatment started. The analysis was based on the difference in slope after the change point. A negative value means that scores during treatment were lower than pre-treatment scores, indicating a decline in T-cells over time. (NCT01884571)
Timeframe: Pre-Treatment Period (2 months prior to the start of treatment), Treatment Period (Day 1 and Months 1, 2, 4, 6)

Interventionfold change per month (Mean)
Immunosuppression Regimen-0.04

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Average Increase in ALSFRS-R Score of One Point Per Month

The ALS Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R) is an ordinal rating scale (0 through 4) used to determine the ALS patient's self assessment of their ability and need for assistance in 12 activities or functions. This is a validated scale, both in person and by phone, which provides a total score (best of 48) from four sub-scores which assess speech and swallowing, (bulbar function), use of upper extremities (cervical function), gait and turning in bed (lumbar function), and breathing (respiratory function). A clinical response is defined as a rate of change of ALSFRS-R of +6 points over 6 months (mean of +1 point per month), where typically patients with ALS have a decline in ALSFRS-R by an average of -1/month. (NCT01884571)
Timeframe: Pre-Treatment Period (3 months prior to the start of treatment, 2 months prior to the start of treatment, and 1 month prior to the start of treatment), Treatment Period (Day 1 and then monthly until Month 6)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Immunosuppression Regimen0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival at 2 Years

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as time from start of protocol treatment to disease relapse/progression, death or last contact, whichever occurs first. Progression-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; the 95% confidence interval was calculated using Greenwood's formula. (NCT01885689)
Timeframe: From start of protocol treatment to death due to any cause, disease relapse/progression, or last follow-up, whichever comes first, assessed up to 2 years.

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Treatment (Clofarabine, Melphalan, Transplant)54

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 2 Years

Overall survival (OS) is defined as time from start of protocol treatment to death from any cause. It was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; the 95% confidence interval was calculated using Greenwood's formula. (NCT01885689)
Timeframe: From start of protocol treatment to death due to any cause, or last follow-up, whichever comes first, assessed up to 2 years.

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Treatment (Clofarabine, Melphalan, Transplant)67

[back to top]

Early Allograft Dysfunction

"Protocol is restricted to liver transplants performed with classic technique with sequential portal-arterial reperfusion.~Early allograft dysfunction will be assessed on the basis of highest levels of AST and ALT during 1-7 postoperative days." (NCT01887171)
Timeframe: 1-7 postoperative days after liver transplant procedure

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tacrolimus + HTK6
HTK Solution Only18

[back to top]

Compare Incidence of Notable Safety Events (SAEs, Infections and Serious Infections Leading to Premature Discontinuation)

Notable events include death, Serious AE/infection,, and AE/infection leading to discontinuation of study medication. (NCT01888432)
Timeframe: Month 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any notable eventsDeathSerious AE/InfectionAE/Infection lead. to premature disc of study med
EVR+Reduced TAC8688321
TAC Control8247818

[back to top]

Compare Incidence of tAR

Compare between the treatment group EVR with rTAC vs standard TAC: incidence of treated acute rejection (tAR). (NCT01888432)
Timeframe: Month 12 and Month 24 post transplantation

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Month 12Month 24
EVR+Reduced TAC57
TAC Control67

[back to top]

Composite Efficacy Failure of Treated Biopsy in Everolimus With Reduced Tacrolimus Group Compared to Standard Tacrolimus in Patients From Japan Only

"Rate of composite efficacy failure of treated biopsy in everolimus with reduced tacrolimus group compared to standard tacrolimus from randomization in core study up to 36 months in the extension study.~Composite endpoint = treated BPAR, graft loss or death. AR = Acute rejection; tAR = treated AR; BPR = biopsy proven rejection; BPAR = biopsy proven acute rejection; tBPAR = treated BPAR" (NCT01888432)
Timeframe: randomization, 36 months post transplantion

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Composite endpointOn-treatment composite endpointGraft loss/deathtBPARGraft lossDeathARtARBPRBPAR
EVR+Reduced TAC2112013263
TAC Control1010102032

[back to top]

Renal Function by Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (All Extension Patients)

Renal function (change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)) from randomization to Month 36 post transplantation with everolimus (EVR) in combination with reduced tacrolimus (rTAC) compared to standard exposure tacrolimus (TAC) in living donor liver transplant recipients in Japan (NCT01888432)
Timeframe: randomization, at 36 months post transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Least Squares Mean)
EVR+Reduced TAC-26.88
TAC Control-16.87

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Composite Efficacy Failure of Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection, Graft Loss or Death in Everolimus With Reduced Tacrolimus Group Compared to Standard Tacrolimus

Rate of composite efficacy failure of treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR ≥ RAI score 3), graft loss (GL) or death (D) in everolimus with reduced tacrolimus group compared to standard tacrolimus at 12 months (NCT01888432)
Timeframe: 12 months post transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
EVR+Reduced TAC7
TAC Control8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Composite of tBPAR, Graft Loss, and Death

Compare between the treatment group EVR with rTAC vs standard TAC: incidence of a composite of tBPAR, graft loss, death (NCT01888432)
Timeframe: Month 24 post transplantation

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
tBPAR/graft loss/deathOn-treatment tBPAR/graft loss/death
EVR+Reduced TAC127
TAC Control119

[back to top]

Compare Incidence of Death

Compare between the treatment group EVR with rTAC vs standard TAC: incidence of death (NCT01888432)
Timeframe: Month 12 and Month 24 post transplantation

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Month 12Month 24Month 24 (on-treatment death)
EVR+Reduced TAC484
TAC Control343

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Experiencing Adverse Events/Infections by SOC

(NCT01888432)
Timeframe: Month 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AE/infectionBlood and lymphatic system disordersCardiac disordersCongenital, familial and genetic disordersEar and labyrinth disordersEndocrine disordersEye disordersGastrointestinal disordersGeneral disorders&admin site conditionsHepatobiliary disordersImmune system disordersInfections and infestationsInjury, poisoning&proced. complicationsInvestigationsMetabolism and nutrition disordersMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersNeoplasms benign, malig&unspecified (cysts&polyps)Nervous system disordersProduct issues#Psychiatric disordersRenal and urinary disordersReproductive system&breast dis.Respiratory, thoracic&mediastinal dis.Skin&subcutaneous tissue disordersVascular disorders
EVR+Reduced TAC140441512117984844884366187301038133469343938
TAC Control13632122521574424011702868604317441263612394430

[back to top]

Compare Renal Function Over Time Assessed by the Change by eGFR, Post-randomization

Change in renal function from randomization to month 24 assessed by the change in estimated GFR (MDRD-4). Rate of change of renal function. (NCT01888432)
Timeframe: From randomziation to month 24

InterventionmL/min/1.73 m2 (Least Squares Mean)
EVR+Reduced TAC-11.01
TAC Control-14.26

[back to top]

Compare Incidence of tBPAR

Compare between the treatment group EVR with rTAC vs standard TAC: Incidence of tBPAR (NCT01888432)
Timeframe: Month 12 and Month 24 post transplantation

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
tBPAR - month 12tBPAR - month 24On-treatment tBPAR - month 24
EVR+Reduced TAC343
TAC Control566

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Time to Recurrence of HCC in Subjects With a Diagnosis of HCC at the Time of Liver Transplantation

Patients transplanted for HCC or with HCC diagnosed at time of transplantation were monitored for HCC recurrence according to local practice. For example routine laboratory monitoring/tests, tumor markers, hepatic ultrasound, computed tomography scans (CAT, CT) or MRI (especially Fe-MRI) on a regular basis per local practice. (NCT01888432)
Timeframe: Month 12 and Month 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HCC recurrence (n/M) - month 12HCC recurrence (n/M) - month 24
EVR+Reduced TAC01
TAC Control56

[back to top]

Renal Function by Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Randomization

Renal function (change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)) from randomization to Month 12 post transplantation with everolimus (EVR) in combination with reduced tacrolimus (rTAC) compared to standard exposure tacrolimus (TAC) in living donor liver transplant recipients. (NCT01888432)
Timeframe: From randomization to month 12

InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Least Squares Mean)
EVR+Reduced TAC-7.94
TAC Control-12.09

[back to top]

Compare Incidence of a Composite of Death or Graft Loss

Compare between the treatment group EVR with rTAC vs standard TAC: Incidence of a composite of death or graft loss (NCT01888432)
Timeframe: Month 12 and Month 24 post transplantation

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Month 12Month 24
EVR+Reduced TAC48
TAC Control35

[back to top]

Compare Incidence of AR

Compare between the treatment group EVR with rTAC vs standard TAC: incidence of acute rejection (AR) (NCT01888432)
Timeframe: Month 12 and Month 24 post transplantation

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Month 12Month 24
EVR+Reduced TAC912
TAC Control89

[back to top]

Compare Incidence of BPAR

Compare between the treatment group EVR with rTAC vs standard TAC: incidence of a composite of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) (NCT01888432)
Timeframe: Month 12 and Month 24 post transplantation

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Month 12Month 24
EVR+Reduced TAC78
TAC Control67

[back to top]

Compare Incidence of Graft Loss

Compare between the treatment group EVR with rTAC vs standard TAC: incidence of graft loss (NCT01888432)
Timeframe: Month 12 and Month 24 post transplantation

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Month 12month 24month 24 (on-treatment graft loss)
EVR+Reduced TAC000
TAC Control010

[back to top]

The Number of CMV Viremia

The number of patients with CMV viremia (NCT01911546)
Timeframe: 12 Months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Everolimus + Low-dose Tacrolimus0

[back to top]

The Number of Polyoma BK Viremia Patients

Patients will be monitored at regular interval for the development of Polyomavirus Viremia. (NCT01911546)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Everolimus + Low-dose Tacrolimus5

[back to top]

Incidence of Cell Mediated Rejection (CMR)

Patients will be monitored for any episodes of CMR. (NCT01911546)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Everolimus + Low-dose Tacrolimus2

[back to top]

Incidence of Antibody Mediated Rejection (ABMR)

Protocol biopsies were obtained at T0 and 6 months post transplant. (NCT01911546)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Everolimus + Low-dose Tacrolimus2

[back to top]

Time to Initiation of Dialysis

Time to dialysis is measured as the time of randomization to initiation of dialysis. Participants already requiring dialysis at the time of enrollment were excluded from this endpoint analysis. (NCT01921218)
Timeframe: Up to Year 2

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Belatacept Treatment Group11.75
Control Group10.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Donor-specific Antibody Formation

The number of participants in each group with donor-specific antibody formation at 36 months following randomization. (NCT01921218)
Timeframe: Month 36

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Belatacept Treatment Group3
Control Group4

[back to top]

Number of Infectious Complications

The number of infections complications occurring among study participants is presented here. (NCT01921218)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 36

Interventioncomplications (Number)
Belatacept Treatment Group12
Control Group18

[back to top]

Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) assesses kidney function. GFR uses values for serum creatinine (SCr) measured in mg/dL, age in years, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) measures in mg/dL, and serum albumin (Alb) measured in g/dL. GFR is calculated as 170 x (SCr/0.95)^(-0.999) x (Age)^(-0.176) x (0.762 if the patient is female) x (1.180 if the patient is black) x (BUN)^(-0.170) x (Alb)^(0.318). A value of 90 or above is considered normal while values between 15 and 29 indicate severely decreased kidney function and values below 15 indicate kidney failure. The GFR in participants who do not require dialysis will be followed for two years. (NCT01921218)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 24

InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
BaselineMonth 1Month 2Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12
Control Group14.51110.516.514.513.520

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Anti-human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Alloantibodies

The presence of anti-HLA Class I and Class II alloantibodies is categorized as being negative (absent for both classes of alloantibodies), positive for Class I, positive for Class II, and positive for both Class I and Class II alloantibodies. (NCT01921218)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 36

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline - NegativeBaseline - Positive Class IBaseline - Positive Class IIBaseline - Positive Class I and IIMonth 12 - NegativeMonth 12 - Positive Class IMonth 12 - Positive Class IIMonth 12 - Positive Class I and IIMonth 24 - NegativeMonth 24 - Positive Class IMonth 24 - Positive Class IIMonth 24 - Positive Class I and IIMonth 36 - NegativeMonth 36 - Positive Class IMonth 36 - Positive Class IIMonth 36 - Positive Class I and II
Belatacept Treatment Group6000410010201020
Control Group5200243312111211

[back to top]

Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) assesses kidney function. GFR uses values for serum creatinine (SCr) measured in mg/dL, age in years, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) measures in mg/dL, and serum albumin (Alb) measured in g/dL. GFR is calculated as 170 x (SCr/0.95)^(-0.999) x (Age)^(-0.176) x (0.762 if the patient is female) x (1.180 if the patient is black) x (BUN)^(-0.170) x (Alb)^(0.318). A value of 90 or above is considered normal while values between 15 and 29 indicate severely decreased kidney function and values below 15 indicate kidney failure. The GFR in participants who do not require dialysis will be followed for two years. (NCT01921218)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 24

InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
BaselineMonth 1Month 2Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12Month 18
Belatacept Treatment Group14.2514.2519.3316.3314.6714.6713.677

[back to top]

Incidence of Unexpected or Serious Adverse Events (AEs)

Grade 3-5 unexpected or serious adverse events (AEs) according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4.03) were captured up to day +130 or 30 days after the last dose of IL-2. Events listed, with causality in relation to study treatment noted. (NCT01927120)
Timeframe: Up to days 130 post HCT

Interventionadverse events (Number)
VOD, possibly relatedPortal vein thrombosis, possibly relatedSepsis, unlikely to be relatedGI bleed, unrelatedAcute kidney injury, unrelatedKidney stone, unrelatedIntracranial hemorrhage, unrelated
GVHD Regimen2111311

[back to top]

Regulatory T Cells (Tregs)/Total CD4+ Cells at Day 30 Post-HCT

Percentage of Treg among blood CD4+ T cells at day 30 after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), to compare to SIR/TAC alone data from a previous trial (median of 16%). The study was designed to capture an increase in regulatory T cells from a median of 16.0% at day +30. (NCT01927120)
Timeframe: 30 days post HCT

Interventionpercentage of CD4+Tregs (Median)
GVHD Regimen23.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival at Day +365

Overall survival will be defined as the time from transplant date to death from any cause. (NCT01927120)
Timeframe: 365 days post HCT

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
GVHD Regimen77.1

[back to top]

Incidence of Non-relapse Death

Incidence of Non-relapse death/Transplant-related mortality. Non-relapse death is defined as death in continuous remission from primary disease requiring transplantation. (NCT01927120)
Timeframe: 365 days post HCT

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
GVHD Regimen5.0

[back to top]

Function of Blood Treg After Allogeneic HSCT

Percent of Treg suppression at day +30. Investigators had also planned to test Treg function at day +90, if sufficient Tregs had been available for analysis. (NCT01927120)
Timeframe: 30 days post HCT

Interventionpercentage of suppression (Median)
GVHD Regimen61.0

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Relapse

Incidence of primary disease relapse per standard definitions. (NCT01927120)
Timeframe: 1 year post HCT

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
GVHD Regimen35.2

[back to top]

Proportion of Treg Among Blood CD4+ T Cells at Day +90 After HCT

The proportion of Tregs to non-Treg CD4+ cells to be assessed at day +90. Natural Killer Cells (NKs): Median K/uL NK cells. (NCT01927120)
Timeframe: 90 days post HCT

InterventionK/uL NK cells (Median)
GVHD Regimen0.212

[back to top]

STAT3, STAT5 (Y694), and S6 Phosphorylation Among Treg and Non-Treg at Day 30

Phosphorylation (p): pSTAT3, pSTAT5 (Y694), and pS6 among Treg and non-Treg at day +30. (NCT01927120)
Timeframe: 30 days post HCT

Interventionpercentage in total CD4s (Median)
pSTAT3pSTAT5pS6
GVHD Regimen34.197.119.3

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD by Day +365

Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD by day +365 per NIH Consensus criteria. (NCT01927120)
Timeframe: 365 days post HCT

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
GVHD Regimen61.5

[back to top]

STAT3, STAT5 (Y694), and S6 Phosphorylation Among Treg and Non-Treg at Day 90

Phosphorylation (p): pSTAT3, pSTAT5 (Y694), and pS6 among Treg and non-Treg at day +90. (NCT01927120)
Timeframe: 90 days post HCT

Interventionpercentage in total CD4s (Median)
pSTAT3pSTAT5pS6
GVHD Regimen20.278.616.3

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD by Day +100

Acute GVHD will be graded per the 1995 consensus guidelines. (NCT01927120)
Timeframe: 100 days post HCT

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
GVHD Regimen40

[back to top]

Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection

The percentage of patients with a treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (a co-primary endpoint) within the 2 year study time period (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus1

[back to top]

Impaired Glucose Tolerance

The number of patients with impaired glucose tolerance as indicated by fasting blood glucose levels, Hemoglobin A1C (HgbA1C) levels and the need for hypoglycemic medications (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus14

[back to top]

Infection Requiring Hospitalization

The number of patients with serious infections as defined by need for hospitalization (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus11

[back to top]

Leukopenia

The number of patients with leukopenia as indicated by white blood cell count less than 1.0, absolute neutrophil count less than 500 or the need for exogenous granulocyte stimulating factor administration (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus1

[back to top]

Malignancies

The number of patients developing malignancies including post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus2

[back to top]

Mouth Ulcers

The number of patients with stomatitis/aphthous ulcer (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus14

[back to top]

Neurotoxicity

The number of patients with neurotoxicity as evidenced by incidence of new onset seizure activity or tremors (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus1

[back to top]

Patient Survival

Patient survival is defined as the percentage of patients still surviving at 2 years post baseline visit (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus49

[back to top]

Pneumonitis

The number of patients with pneumonitis as demonstrated by lung inflammation symptoms such as shortness of breath and/or cough requiring clinical intervention and management (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus3

[back to top]

Gastrointestinal Complaints

The number of patients with gastrointestinal complaints as indicated by abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting or diarrhea not accounted for by a specific episode of illness such as gastroenteritis (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus22

[back to top]

Cardiovascular Complications

The number of patients with cardiovascular complications as indicated by conditions such as dysrhythmias, coronary artery disease requiring intervention or myocardial infarction (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus1

[back to top]

BK Nephropathy

The number of patients with BK nephropathy as defined by biopsy. Note that biopsies were not required as part of the study but were only done as part of the patient's standard of care if rejection was suspected (i.e. if the serum creatinine increased by 25% and was not associated with elevated tacrolimus levels or clinical signs of dehydration/illness to account for elevated creatinine) (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus0

[back to top]

Development of Donor Specific Antibody

The number of patients with incidence of development of donor specific antibody (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus2

[back to top]

Lipid Levels

The number of patients with hyperlipidemia as defined by the development of new onset hyperlipidemia in the baseline negative patients and the number of baseline positive patients who required starting a new lipid-lowering medication or an increase in dose of their lipid-lowering medication over the course of the study (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline negative patients with new onset hyperlipidemiaBaseline positive patients started on new lipid-lowering medication or needing increase in dose
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus719

[back to top]

Cytomegalovirus

The number of patients with Incidence of cytomegalovirus infection as defined by need for hospitalization (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus0

[back to top]

Thrombocytopenia

The number of patients with thrombocytopenia as defined by platelet count less than 50 (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus0

[back to top]

Renal Function

"Renal function in patients will be assessed using glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as measured by the Modified Diet Renal Disease (MDRD) estimation.~Glomerular filtration is the process by which the kidneys filter the blood, removing excess wastes and fluids. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a calculation that determines how well the blood is filtered by the kidneys, which is one way to measure remaining kidney function. GFR is also used to find the stage of chronic kidney disease. Glomerular filtration rate is usually calculated using a mathematical formula that compares a person's size, age, sex, and race to serum creatinine levels. The higher the GFR number, the better the kidney function; the lower the GFR number, the worse the kidney function. A GFR of 60 or higher is in the normal range. A GFR below 60 may mean kidney disease. A GFR of 15 or lower may mean kidney failure." (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionmL/min/1.73 m2 (Mean)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus65.70

[back to top]

Proteinuria

The number of patients with proteinuria as defined by spot urine protein to creatinine ratio greater than 1.0 (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus7

[back to top]

BK Infection

The number of patients with BK infection as defined by blood titers requiring reduction in immunosuppressive dose (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus7

[back to top]

Graft Survival

Graft survival is defined as the percentage of kidney transplants still functioning at 2 years post baseline visit . One patient died of natural causes at 12 months with a functioning graft. (NCT01935128)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 Everolimus/Reduced Dose Tacrolimus49

[back to top]

Renal Function as Measured by 24 Hour Urine Creatinine Clearance

Renal Function was assessed by 24 hr urine collection creatinine clearance measured (mL/min). 24 Hr urine collection was assessed at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post transplant. (NCT01936519)
Timeframe: 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years

,
InterventionmL/min (Mean)
24hr Urine Creatinine Clearance at 6 months24hr Urine Creatinine Clearance at 1 year24hr Urine Creatinine Clearance at 2 years
Calcineurin Inhibitor With Mycophenolic Acid68.0968.0961.54
Everolimus With Mycophenolic Acid70.7586.890.63

[back to top]

Renal Function as Measured by Cockcroft Gault Creatinine Clearance

The Cockcroft-Gault formula for estimating creatinine clearance was determined at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post transplant (NCT01936519)
Timeframe: 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Cockcroft Gault Creatinine Clearance at 6 monthsCockcroft Gault Creatinine Clearance at 1 yearCockcroft Gault Creatinine Clearance at 2 years
Calcineurin Inhibitor and Mycophenolic Acid79.8486.8480.85
Everolimus and Mycophenolic Acid100.17113.47108.16

[back to top]

Renal Function as Measured by Iothalamate Clearance

Iothalamate Clearance was assessed at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post transplant. (NCT01936519)
Timeframe: 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Iothalamate Clearance at 6 monthsIothalamate Clearance at 1 yearIothalamate Clearance at 2 years
Calcineurin Inhibitor and Mycophenolic Acid67.9966.6557.19
Everolimus and Mycophenolic Acid74.23104.0179.41

[back to top]

Renal Function as Measured by Serum Creatinine Level

Serum creatinine levels were assessed at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post transplant (NCT01936519)
Timeframe: 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Serum Creatinine at 6 monthsSerum Creatinine at 1 yearSerum Creatinine at 2 years
Calcineurin Inhibitor and Mycophenolic Acid1.291.291.51
Everolimus and Mycophenolic Acid1.020.950.95

[back to top]

Renal Function as Measured by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)

Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was assessed at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post transplant. (NCT01936519)
Timeframe: 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73 m2 (Mean)
MDRD eGFR at 6 monthsMDRD eGFR at 1 yearMDRD eGFR at 2 years
Calcineurin Inhibitor and Mycophenolic Acid62.1860.6353.29
Everolimus and Mycophenolic Acid81.2788.0187.37

[back to top]

Recipient and Donor Genotyping for Selected Variants of CYP3A5, ABCB1 (MDR1), and CYP4A Genes

A blood sample was obtained from recipients and donors to measure gene polymorphism effects on metabolism of calcineurin inhibitor and everolimus. The polymorphisms are represented as the number of SNP occurrences for the CYP3A5, ABCB1 (MDR1) gene, and CYP4A4*22 genes. (NCT01936519)
Timeframe: 2 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Recipient Genotypes : rs776746 (CYP3A5 gene)Recipient Genotypes : rs1045642 (ABCB1 gene)Recipient Genotypes : rs1128503 (ABCB1 gene)Recipient Genotypes : rs2032582 (ABCB1 gene)Recipient Genotypes : rs35599367 (CYP4A4*22 gene)Donor Genotypes : rs776746 (CYP3A5 gene)Donor Genotypes : rs1045642 (ABCB1 gene)Donor Genotypes : rs1128503 (ABCB1 gene)Donor Genotypes : rs2032582 (ABCB1 gene)Donor Genotypes : rs35599367 (Cyp4A4*22)
Calcineurin Inhibitor and Mycophenolic Acid11671131000
Everolimus and Mycophenolic Acid11680105001

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 4 Weeks After the End of Treatment (SVR 4)

Participants were considered to have achieved SVR4 if HCV RNA levels were (<) 25 IU/mL detectable or undetectable at 4 weeks after the end of treatment. (NCT01938625)
Timeframe: Week 28

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cyclosporine100
Tacrolimus88

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Viral Relapse

Participants who did not achieve SVR12, with undetectable HCV RNA at the actual end of study drug treatment and confirmed HCV RNA greater than or equal to (>=) LLOQ during follow-up. (NCT01938625)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24 after actual EOT (week 24)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cyclosporine0
Tacrolimus0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After the End of Treatment (SVR 24)

Participants were considered to have achieved SVR 24 if hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels were (<) 25 IU/mL detectable or undetectable at 24 weeks after the end of treatment. (NCT01938625)
Timeframe: Week 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cyclosporine100
Tacrolimus88

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Viral Breakthrough

Viral breakthrough is defined as a confirmed increase of >1 log10 IU/mL in HCV RNA level from the lowest level reached, or a confirmed HCV RNA level of >100 IU/mL in participants whose HCV RNA levels had previously been below the limit of quantification (<25 IU/mL detectable) or undetectable (<25 IU/mL undetectable) while on study treatment. (NCT01938625)
Timeframe: Up to week 24

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cyclosporine0
Tacrolimus3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With On-Treatment Failure

On-treatment failure is defined as participants who did not achieve SVR12 and with confirmed detectable HCV RNA at the actual end of treatment. This was to include participants with: 1) Viral breakthrough, defined as a confirmed increase of greater than (>)1 log10 in HCV RNA from nadir, or confirmed HCV RNA of >100 IU/mL in participants whose HCV RNA had previously been NCT01938625)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24 after actual EOT (week 24)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cyclosporine0
Tacrolimus3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After the End of Treatment (SVR 12)

Participants were considered to have achieved SVR12 if hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels were less than (<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) detectable or undetectable at 12 weeks after the end of treatment. (NCT01938625)
Timeframe: Week 36

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cyclosporine100
Tacrolimus88

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HCV RNA (<) 100 IU/mL at Week 4

Percentage of participants with HCV RNA (<) 100 IU/mL at week 4 were reported. (NCT01938625)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cyclosporine100
Tacrolimus100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With HCV RNA (< 25 IU/mL Undetectable) and HCV RNA < 25 IU/mL Detectable

Percentage of participants with detectable and undetectable HCV RNA (<) 25 IU/mL during treatment at Weeks 2,4, 12, and 24 were reported. (NCT01938625)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2: <25 IU/mL detectableWeek 2: <25 IU/mL undetectableWeek 4: <25 IU/mL detectableWeek 4: <25 IU/mL undetectableWeek 12: <25 IU/mL detectableWeek 12: <25 IU/mL undetectableWeek 24: <25 IU/mL detectableWeek 24: <25 IU/mL undetectable
Cyclosporine3010307001000100
Tacrolimus361224680960100

[back to top]

Renal Function by Alternative Formulae (e.g. CKD-EPI). eGFR Values Reported

Mean Renal function as used in clinical practice, using different formula for calculation of renal function than MDRD4 (our primary efficacy parameter), and other alternate formulae (e.g. CKD-EPI). Analysis is done without considering missing values for analysis. (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
eGFR (Hoek) baseline (mL/min/1.73m2)eGFR (Hoek) month 12 (mL/min/1.73m2)eGFR (Hoek) month 24 (mL/min/1.73m2)eGFR (MDRD4) baseline (mL/min/1.73m2)eGFR (MDRD4) month 12 (mL/min/1.73m2)eGFR (MDRD4) month 24 (mL/min/1.73m2)eGFR-CKDEPI baseline (mL/min/1.73m2)eGFR-CKDEPI month 12(mL/min/1.73m2)eGFR-CKDEPI month 24 (mL/min/1.73m2)
EVR+rCNI21.3850.0849.8611.7957.5958.0711.2958.8359.39
MPA+sCNI20.1052.0052.7511.5657.5858.6811.0558.7559.95

[back to top]

Renal Function Assessed by Creatinine Lab Values

Mean Renal function as assessed in clinical practice, by ceatinine values. Analysis is done without considering missing values for analysis. (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
Interventionmicromol/L (Mean)
screening baseline (creatinine, micromol/L)month 12 (creatinine, micromol/L)month 24 (creatinine, micromol/L)
EVR+rCNI590.1129.8130.1
MPA+sCNI601.8128.6127.6

[back to top]

Incidence of tBPAR (Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection) Excluding Grade IA Rejections

"Incidence of tBPAR, defined as any condition where the subject received anti-rejection treatment and was histologically diagnosed as acute rejection (according to the Banff 2009 criteria), excluding grade IA rejections. Grades for T-cell mediated rejection, with increasing severity:~Type IA - Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).~Type IB - Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).~Type IIA - Mild to moderate intimal arteritis~Type IIB - Severe intimal arteritis comprising > 25% of the lumenal area~Type III - Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation)" (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
month 12month 24
EVR+rCNI6674
MPA+sCNI5355

[back to top]

Incidence of tBPAR (Excluding Grade IA Rejections) or GFR<50 mL/Min/1.73m2

Incidence of tBPAR (excluding grade IA rejections) or GFR<50 mL/min/1.73m2 (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
month 12month 24
EVR+rCNI475475
MPA+sCNI441426

[back to top]

Incidence of Failure on the Composite of Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR) or Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) < 50 mL/Min/1.73m2.

Incidence of failure on the composite of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (tBPAR) or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 50 mL/min/1.73m2. (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 is Primary, Month 24 secondary

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
month 12month 24
EVR+rCNI489489
MPA+sCNI456443

[back to top]

Incidence of Failure on the Composite of Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR) or Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) < 50 mL/Min/1.73m2 Among Compliant Subjects.

Incidence of failure on the composite of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (tBPAR) or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 50 mL/min/1.73m2 among compliant subjects. (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
month 12month 24
EVR+rCNI6062
MPA+sCNI106102

[back to top]

Incidence of Failure on the Composite of (Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR), Graft Loss or Death or Loss to Follow-up

Incidence of failure on the composite of (treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss or death or loss to follow-up (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
month 12month 24
EVR+rCNI181218
MPA+sCNI170201

[back to top]

Incidence of Failure on the Composite of (Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR), Graft Loss or Death

Incidence of failure on the composite of (treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss or death (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
month 12month 24
EVR+rCNI146169
MPA+sCNI131147

[back to top]

Incidence of Failure on the Composite Endpoint of tBPAR, Graft Loss, Death or eGFR < 50 mL/Min/1.73m2

Incidence of failure on the composite endpoint of tBPAR, graft loss, death or eGFR < 50 mL/min/1.73m2 (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
month 12month 24
EVR+rCNI497497
MPA+sCNI466457

[back to top]

Incidence of Failure on the Composite Endpoint of Graft Loss or Death.

Incidence of failure on the composite endpoint of graft loss or death. (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
month 12month 24
EVR+rCNI5167
MPA+sCNI5465

[back to top]

Incidence of eGFR < 50 mL/Min/1.73m2

Incidence of eGFR < 50 mL/min/1.73m2 (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
month 12month 24
EVR+rCNI456474
MPA+sCNI424423

[back to top]

Incidence tBPAR (Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection) by Severity and Time to Event (Events)

"Incidence tBPAR, defined as any condition where the subject received anti-rejection treatment and was histologically diagnosed as acute rejection (according to the Banff 2009 criteria), by severity (grade IA, IB, IIA, IIB, III) and time to event. Grades for T-cell mediated rejection, with increasing severity:~Type IA - Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).~Type IB - Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).~Type IIA - Mild to moderate intimal arteritis~Type IIB - Severe intimal arteritis comprising > 25% of the lumenal area~Type III - Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation)" (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
Interventionevents (Number)
overall number of tBPAR regardless of gradenumber of tBPAR regardless of grade days 1-90number of tBPAR regardless of grade days 91-180number of tBPAR regardless of grade days 181-360number of tBPAR regardless of grade days 361-540number of tBPAR regardless of grade days 541-720number of tBPAR regardless of grade days 721-810
EVR+rCNI14672242512112
MPA+sCNI1166314201522

[back to top]

Incidence of Death, Graft Loss, tBPAR, BPAR, tAR, AR and Humoral Rejection

Incidence of death, graft loss, tBPAR (treated biopsy proven acute rejection), BPAR (biopsy proven acute rejection), tAR (treated acute rejection), AR (acute rejection) and humoral rejection (aAMR : active antibody mediated rejection and cAMR: chronic antibody mediated rejection) (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
deaths month 12deaths month 24graft loss month 12graft loss month 24tBPAR month 12tBPAR month 24BPAR month 12BPAR month 24tAR month 12tAR month 24AR month 12AR month 24aAMR month 12aAMR month 24cAMR month 12cAMR month 24
EVR+rCNI203233371071181141271291451471677384913
MPA+sCNI2836283291989510411712613314461691418

[back to top]

Incidence of Cytomegalovirus and BK Virus, New Onset Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease With Associated Proteinuria and Calcineurin Inhibitor Associated Adverse Events.

Incidence of cytomegalovirus and BK virus, new onset diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease with associated proteinuria and calcineurin inhibitor associated adverse events. (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
clinical signs of CMV infectionany BKV infectionnew onset of diabetes mellitusat least one event of interest
EVR+rCNI53103144871
MPA+sCNI132154138764

[back to top]

Incidence of Malignancies.

Incidence of malignancies. (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
EVR+rCNI41
MPA+sCNI39

[back to top]

Incidence of Major Cardiovascular Events.

Incidence of major cardiovascular events by Preferred Term (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
EVR+rCNI66
MPA+sCNI86

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Events Leading to Study Regimen Discontinuation.

Incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events and adverse events leading to study regimen discontinuation. (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
EVR+rCNI276
MPA+sCNI152

[back to top]

Incidence of Composite of tBPAR (Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection)or eGRF<50 mL/Min/1.73m2 by Subgroup

Incidence of composite of tBPAR or eGRF<50 mL/min/1.73m2 by subgroup (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
month 12month 24
EVR+rCNI489489
MPA+sCNI456443

[back to top]

Urinary Protein and Albumin Excretion by Treatment Estimated by Urinary Protein/Creatinine and Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratios.

Mean urinary protein and albumin excretion by treatment estimated by mean urinary protein/creatinine and urinary albumin/creatinine ratios. (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12 and 24

,
Interventionmg/g (Mean)
albumine /creatinine ratio baselinealbumine /creatinine ratio month 12albumine /creatinine ratio month 24protein /creatinine ratio baselineprotein /creatinine ratio month 12protein /creatinine ratio month 24
EVR+rCNI1019.75150.061149.0491648.10298.557290.242
MPA+sCNI646.111111.322116.6181142.59234.698233.009

[back to top]

Evolution of Renal Function, as eGFR, Over Time by Slope Analysis.

Rate of change of renal function, as eGFR, calculated using MDRD4 formula (Coresh, 2003) and adjusted by covariates. (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

InterventionmL / min / 1.73m2 / day (Mean)
EVR+rCNI0.0001
MPA+sCNI0.0047

[back to top]

Renal Allograft Function : Mean Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, eGFR

Renal allograft function : mean estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 4), Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
baseline (week 4)month 12month 24
EVR+rCNI53.1353.2952.63
MPA+sCNI52.2554.4954.91

[back to top]

Incidence tBPAR (Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection) by Severity and Time to Event (Participants)

"Incidence tBPAR, defined as any condition where the subject received anti-rejection treatment and was histologically diagnosed as acute rejection (according to the Banff 2009 criteria), by severity (grade IA, IB, IIA, IIB, III) and time to event. Grades for T-cell mediated rejection, with increasing severity:~Type IA - Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).~Type IB - Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).~Type IIA - Mild to moderate intimal arteritis~Type IIB - Severe intimal arteritis comprising > 25% of the lumenal area~Type III - Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation)" (NCT01950819)
Timeframe: Month 12 and 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Patient's maximum tBPAR grade : no grade (missing)Patient's maximum tBPAR grade : grade IAPatient's maximum tBPAR grade : grade IBPatient's maximum tBPAR grade : grade IIAPatient's maximum tBPAR grade : grade IIBPatient's maximum tBPAR grade : grade III
EVR+rCNI2534232196
MPA+sCNI1836172430

[back to top]

Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Elevated Liver Enzymes

100-day incidence of hepatotoxicity will be compared using a Gray test. Percentage of patients with elevated Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase and a 95% confidence interval (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: Up to day +100

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ASTALTAlkaline Phosphatase
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)29332
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)15282

[back to top]

Incidence of Chronic GVHD

"Chronic GVHD will be graded as mild, moderate, or severe based on the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project. The type and duration of immunosuppressive treatment given for cGVHD will be recorded. Mild grades are associated with a better participant outcome and severe corresponds to a worse participant outcome. Grading is as follows:~Mild: 1 or 2 organs involved with no more than score 1 plus Lung score 0~Moderate: 3 or more organs involved with no more than score 1 OR At least 1 organ (not lung) with a score of 2 OR Lung score 1~Severe: At least 1 organ with a score of 3 OR Lung score of 2 or 3~Organ scores can range from 0 to 3, with 0 being no symptoms on the target organ and a better participant outcome while a score of 3 correlates to severe symptoms on the target organ and worse participant outcomes.~Potential target organs include: skin, mouth, eyes, GI tract, liver, lungs, joint /fascia, and genital tract" (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: at 6 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
any chronic GVHDmoderate-severe chronic GVHD
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)1612
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)1511

[back to top]

Incidence of Chronic GVHD

"Chronic GVHD will be graded as mild, moderate, or severe based on the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project. The type and duration of immunosuppressive treatment given for cGVHD will be recorded. Mild grades are associated with a better participant outcome and severe corresponds to a worse participant outcome. Grading is as follows:~Mild: 1 or 2 organs involved with no more than score 1 plus Lung score 0~Moderate: 3 or more organs involved with no more than score 1 OR At least 1 organ (not lung) with a score of 2 OR Lung score 1~Severe: At least 1 organ with a score of 3 OR Lung score of 2 or 3~Organ scores can range from 0 to 3, with 0 being no symptoms on the target organ and a better participant outcome while a score of 3 correlates to severe symptoms on the target organ and worse participant outcomes.~Potential target organs include: skin, mouth, eyes, GI tract, liver, lungs, joint /fascia, and genital tract" (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: at 12 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
any chronic GVHDmoderate-severe chronic GVHD
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)2520
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)3623

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Participants With Acute GVHD

"Acute GVHD by grade will be estimated using cumulative incidence methods and compared using the Gray test.~A lower clinical grade and/or stage of GVHD corresponds to a better participant outcome and a higher grade corresponds to a worse participant outcome. Grading is as follows:~Grade 0: No stage 1-4 of any organ Grade 1: Stage 1-2 skin without liver, upper GI, or lower GI involvement. Grade 2: Stage 3 rash and/or stage 1 liver and/or stage 1 upper GI and/or stage 1 lower GI.~Grade 3: Stage 2-3 liver and/or stage 2-3 lower GI, with stage 0-3 skin and/or stage 0-1 upper GI.~Grade 4: Stage 4 skin, liver, or lower GI involvement, with stage 0-1 upper GI.~A greater stage of GVHD involves worsening end-organ involvement and worse participant outcomes based on the skin, liver, lower GI, and upper GI." (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: Day 7- Day 100

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 1-4Grade 2-4Grade 3-4
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)37274
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)472813

[back to top]

Time to Platelet Engraftment

The number of days to reach a platelet count of greater than or equal to 20,000/ul for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days, independent of platelet transfusions the prior 7 days. The day of engraftment will be the first day of the three consecutive laboratory values. For cases of delayed engraftment beyond 28 days, results will be recorded once the participant engrafts. (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: The date the participant engrafts, up to 28 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)27
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)23

[back to top]

Time to Neutrophil Engraftment

The number of days to reach a neutrophil count of greater than or equal to 500/ul for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days. The day of engraftment will be the first day of the three consecutive laboratory values. (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)17
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)15

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the 2 groups using the log-rank test. (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)59
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)68

[back to top]

Percentage of Severe (Grade 3-4) Mucositis Graded According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Grading Scale

"Participants (percentage of) will be graded three times per week through day 28 of the study. Incidence will be compared through Wilcoxon rank sum tests.~The WHO grading scale for mucositis is scaled depending on the severity of mucositis symptoms, with a lower stage associated with a better outcome and greater stages associated with worse outcomes. The staging is as follows:~Stage 0: None Stage 1 (mild): Oral soreness, erythema Stage 2 (moderate): Oral erythema, ulcers, solid diet tolerated Stage 3 (severe): Oral ulcers, liquid diet only Stage 4 (life-threatening): Oral alimentation impossible" (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: Up to day 28

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)81.6
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)57.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Using Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) Within 100 Days

TPN use will be compared using the Chi-square test. (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: Up to day 100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)41
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)38

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the 2 groups using the log-rank test. (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)71
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)72

[back to top]

Length of Hospitalization

Hospital stay will be compared between patients in groups A and B using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: Date of transplant to date of discharge, assessed up to 1 year

Interventiondays (Median)
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)31
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)27

[back to top]

Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Respiratory Failure

180-day incidence of pulmonary toxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with respiratory failure and 95% confidence interval (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: Up to day +180

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)9
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)6

[back to top]

Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Pulmonary Hemorrhage

180-day incidence of pulmonary toxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with pulmonary hemorrhage and 95% confidence interval (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: Up to day +180

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)2
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)2

[back to top]

Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Pulmonary Edema

180-day incidence of pulmonary toxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with pulmonary edema and 95% confidence interval (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: Up to day +180

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)14
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)4

[back to top]

Incidence of Infection

100-day incidence of infection will be compared using a the Gray test. (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: Up to day +100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)63
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)53

[back to top]

Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Bilirubin

100-day incidence of hepatotoxicity will be compared using a Gray test. Median and range of largest total bilirubin (mg/dL), (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: Up to day +100

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)1.5
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)1.1

[back to top]

Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)

100-day incidence of hepatotoxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with VOD and 95% confidence interval (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: Up to day +100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)8
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)2

[back to top]

Length of Time on Continuous Infusion Narcotics

Start and stop dates for the need of continuous IV infusion of narcotics for severe mucositis pain will be recorded. Time on IV infusion will be compared between patients in groups A and B using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: up to +28 day

Interventiondays (Median)
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)10
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)9

[back to top]

Incidence of Nephrotoxicity

100-day incidence of nephrotoxicity will be compared using a Chi-squared test. Percentage of patients requiring dialysis and those with elevated creatinine using a 95% confidence interval (NCT01951885)
Timeframe: Up to day +100

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Participants requiring dialysisParticipants with elevated creatinine
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)1227
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)42

[back to top]

Evaluation of C(Max) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac

"Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling time was used to calculate C(max). Arithmetic mean and standard deviation is given below.~Nominal time points used were: Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18 and 24 hours." (NCT01962922)
Timeframe: Day 7

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Envarsus XR16.53
Tacrolimus - IR26.84

[back to top]

Evaluation of C(Max) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac

"Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling time was used to calculate C(max). Arithmetic mean and standard deviation is given below.~Nominal time points used were: Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18 and 24 hours." (NCT01962922)
Timeframe: Day 21

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Envarsus XR19.71
Tacrolimus - IR26.31

[back to top]

Evaluation of C(Max) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac

"Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling time was used to calculate C(max). Arithmetic mean and standard deviation is given below.~Nominal time points used were: Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18 and 24 hours." (NCT01962922)
Timeframe: Day 14

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Envarsus XR20.83
Tacrolimus - IR26.31

[back to top]

Evaluation of AUC(0-24) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac

"Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling time was used to calculate AUC(0-24). Arithmetic mean and standard deviation is given below.~Nominal time points used were: Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18 and 24 hours." (NCT01962922)
Timeframe: Day 21

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
Envarsus XR289.3
Tacrolimus - IR230.3

[back to top]

Evaluation of AUC(0-24) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac

"Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling time was used to calculate AUC(0-24). Arithmetic mean and standard deviation is given below.~Nominal time points used were: Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18 and 24 hours." (NCT01962922)
Timeframe: Day 7

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
Envarsus XR251.9
Tacrolimus - IR247.9

[back to top]

Evaluation of AUC(0-24) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac

"Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling time was used to calculate AUC(0-24). Arithmetic mean and standard deviation is given below.~Nominal time points used were: Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18 and 24 hours." (NCT01962922)
Timeframe: Day 14

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
Envarsus XR293.3
Tacrolimus - IR225.7

[back to top]

Evaluation of C(Min) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac

"Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling time was used to calculate AUC(0-24). Arithmetic mean and standard deviation is given below.~Nominal time points used were: Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18 and 24 hours." (NCT01962922)
Timeframe: Day 21

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Envarsus XR8.01
Tacrolimus - IR6.62

[back to top]

Evaluation of C(Min) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac

"Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling time was used to calculate AUC(0-24). Arithmetic mean and standard deviation is given below.~Nominal time points used were: Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18 and 24 hours." (NCT01962922)
Timeframe: Day 7

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Envarsus XR7.51
Tacrolimus - IR7.06

[back to top]

Evaluation of C(Min) for Envarsus XR and IR-Tac

"Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling time was used to calculate AUC(0-24). Arithmetic mean and standard deviation is given below.~Nominal time points used were: Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18 and 24 hours" (NCT01962922)
Timeframe: Day 14

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Envarsus XR8.34
Tacrolimus - IR6.46

[back to top]

Schirmer Tear Test (mm)

Schirmer tear test measures the amount of tear secretion produced by a patient in millimeters (mm). Generally, the greater amounts of tear secretion is better than smaller amounts of tear secretion. The minimum value of this scale is 0 mm of tear secretion and there is no maximum value to this scale. (NCT01977781)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

Interventionmillimeter (mm) (Mean)
Tacrolimus3.5
Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate3.5

[back to top]

Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire

The OSDI questionnaire is a 12-question survey used to measure the symptoms of dry eye disease. Each of the 12 individual questions rate each of the dry eye symptoms on a 0-4 scale, with 4 meaning that the symptom is present all of the time and 0 meaning the symptom is present none of the time. The overall ODSI score is calculated by adding all of the values from the 12 questions, multiplying that value by 25, and dividing the resulting value by the number of questions answered. This results in an overall scale that ranges from 0-100, with 100 being severe dry eye symptoms and 0 being no dry eye symptoms. (NCT01977781)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tacrolimus42
Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate28

[back to top]

Corneal Epitheliopathy (Corneal Fluorescein Staining Using the NEI Grading Scheme)

Corneal fluorescein staining is used to assess the level of corneal epitheliopathy that is related to dry eye disease. The corneal fluorescein staining scale ranges from 0 to 15, with 0 representing the minimum level of corneal epitheliopathy and 15 representing the maximum level of epitheliopathy. (NCT01977781)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tacrolimus3.7
Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate6.6

[back to top]

Ocular Burning Sensation, Ocular Discharge, Ocular Redness, Ocular Itching, Foreign Body Sensation

Ocular burning sensation, ocular discharge, ocular redness, ocular Itching, and foreign body sensation were measured to evaluate the safety and tolerability of topical tacrolimus 0.05% twice a day in the treatment of patients with ocular GVHD. Safety and tolerability of topical tacrolimus 0.05% twice a day will be monitored by the occurrence of systemic and ocular adverse events in addition to symptoms directly related to the instillation or use of the investigational medication. Subjects will be monitored at each study visit for the occurrence of any adverse events found through examination or patient reports. Tolerability will be evaluated at every visit with a self-response questionnaire that assessed burning sensation, discharge, redness, itchiness, and foreign body sensation on a scale from 0 to 4 (none = 0, trace = 1, mild = 2, moderate = 3, and severe = 4). Where a higher value represents more symptoms (less tolerability). (NCT01977781)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ocular Burning SensationOcular DischargeOcular RednessOcular ItchingForeign Body Sensation
Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate2.230.260.430.600.57
Tacrolimus3.500.161.250.500.70

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure

Intraocular pressure is the measure of the fluid pressure within the eye as measured by tonometry. Intraocular pressure is normally measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). The normal range for intraocular pressure is 12-20 mmHg, there is no better or worse measurement. (NCT01977781)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Tacrolimus16.5
Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate17.1

[back to top]

Visual Acuity

Visual acuity is measured by asking subjects to read letters on a chart that consists of different rows of letters. Each row of letters corresponds to different levels of visual acuity. The Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) scale generally ranges from 0 to 1, with 0 corresponding to 20/20 vision and 1 corresponding to 20/200 vision. The range from 0-1 is not absolute, however, as patients who have vision better than 20/20 or vision worse than 20/200 will score out side of the 0 to 1 range. (NCT01977781)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

InterventionLogMAR Scale (Mean)
Tacrolimus0.13
Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate0.13

[back to top]

Tear Film Break-Up Time

Tear Film Break-Up Time measures the amount of time, in seconds, that the tear film completely coats the ocular surface after each blink. The longer the amount of time the tear film completely coats the ocular surface is considered to be better than a shorter amount of time. (NCT01977781)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

InterventionSeconds (Mean)
Tacrolimus2.6
Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate1.0

[back to top]

C24,ss (Maximum Measured Concentration of the FDV [Followed by Tac Treatment] in Plasma at Steady State Over a 24 Hour Dosing Interval)

"PK sampling (relative to the first tac administration [h:min]):~period 2 For FDV~-144:00h, -120:00h, -96:00h, -72:00h, -48:00h, -24:00h, -23:30h, -23:00h, -22:30h, -22:00h, -21:00h, -20:00h, -18:00h, -16:00h, -14:00h, -12:00h, -8:00h, 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h, 120:00h, 144:00h, 168:00h." (NCT02016625)
Timeframe: up to 168 hours (details in description)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Faldaprevir904
Tacrolimus + Faldaprevir900

[back to top]

Cmax (Maximum Measured Concentration of the Tac in Plasma)

"Cmax (maximum measured concentration of the tac in plasma).~PK sampling (relative to the first tac administration [h:min]):~Period 1:~for tac 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h, 144:00h, 168:00h, 192:00h Period 2 For tac~-192:00h, -168:00h, 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h, 120:00h, 144:00h, 168:00h" (NCT02016625)
Timeframe: up to 192 hours (details in description)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Tacrolimus1.14
Tacrolimus + Faldaprevir1.13

[back to top]

AUC τ,ss (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of the Analyte in Plasma at Steady State Over a Uniform Dosing Interval τ)

"AUC τ,ss (area under the concentration-time curve of the FDV in plasma at steady state over a uniform dosing interval τ).~PK sampling (relative to the first cyclo administration [h:min]):~period 2 For FDV~-144:00h, -120:00h, -96:00h, -72:00h, -48:00h, -24:00h, -23:30h, -23:00h, -22:30h, -22:00h, -21:00h, -20:00h, -18:00h, -16:00h, -14:00h, -12:00h, -8:00h, 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h, 120:00h, 144:00h, 168:00h" (NCT02016625)
Timeframe: up to 168 hours (details in description)

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Faldaprevir24600
Cyclosporine + Faldaprevir30600

[back to top]

AUC 0-tz (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of the Tac in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 to the Last Quantifiable Point)

"AUC 0-tz (area under the concentration-time curve of the tac in plasma over the time interval from 0 to the last quantifiable point).~PK sampling (relative to the first tac administration [h:min]):~Period 1: for tac~0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h, 144:00h, 168:00h, 192:00h~Period 2 For tac~-192:00h, -168:00h, 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h, 120:00h, 144:00h, 168:00h" (NCT02016625)
Timeframe: up to 192 hours (details in description)

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Tacrolimus11.1
Tacrolimus + Faldaprevir15.3

[back to top]

AUC 0-tz (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of the Cyclo in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 to the Last Quantifiable Point)

"AUC 0-tz (area under the concentration-time curve of the cyclo in plasma over the time interval from 0 to the last quantifiable point).~PK sampling (relative to the first cyclo administration [h:min]):~Period 1:~for cyclo 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h period 2 for cyclo 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h, 120:00h, 144:00h, 168:00h." (NCT02016625)
Timeframe: up to 168 hours (details in description)

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cyclosporine635
Cyclosporine + Faldaprevir685

[back to top]

AUC τ,ss (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of the FDV [Followed by Tac Treatment] in Plasma at Steady State Over a Uniform Dosing Interval τ)

"AUC τ,ss (area under the concentration-time curve of the FDV [followed by tac treatment] in plasma at steady state over a uniform dosing interval τ).~PK sampling (relative to the first cyclo administration [h:min]):~period 2 For FDV~-144:00h, -120:00h, -96:00h, -72:00h, -48:00h, -24:00h, -23:30h, -23:00h, -22:30h, -22:00h, -21:00h, -20:00h, -18:00h, -16:00h, -14:00h, -12:00h, -8:00h, 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h, 120:00h, 144:00h, 168:00h." (NCT02016625)
Timeframe: up to 168 hours (details in description)

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Faldaprevir40300
Tacrolimus + Faldaprevir38700

[back to top]

C24,ss (Maximum Measured Concentration of the FDV in Plasma at Steady State Over a 24 Hour Dosing Interval)

"PK sampling (relative to the first cyclo administration [h:min]):~period 2 For FDV~-144:00h, -120:00h, -96:00h, -72:00h, -48:00h, -24:00h, -23:30h, -23:00h, -22:30h, -22:00h, -21:00h, -20:00h, -18:00h, -16:00h, -14:00h, -12:00h, -8:00h, 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h, 120:00h, 144:00h, 168:00h" (NCT02016625)
Timeframe: up to 168 hours (details in description)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Faldaprevir619
Cyclosporine + Faldaprevir723

[back to top]

AUC 0-infinity (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of the Tac in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity)

"AUC 0-infinity (area under the concentration-time curve of the tac in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity).~PK sampling (relative to the first tac administration):~Period 1: for tac 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h, 144:00h, 168:00h, 192:00h period 2 for tac~-192:00h, -168:00h, 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h, 120:00h, 144:00h, 168:00h" (NCT02016625)
Timeframe: up to 192 hours (details in description)

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Tacrolimus16.0
Tacrolimus + Faldaprevir20.4

[back to top]

AUC 0-infinity (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of the Cyclo in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity)

"AUC 0-infinity (area under the concentration-time curve of the cyclo in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity).~PK sampling (relative to the first cyclo administration [h:min])~Period 1:~for cyclo 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h.~period 2 for cyclo 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h, 120:00h, 144:00h, 168:00h." (NCT02016625)
Timeframe: up to 168 hours (details in description)

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cyclosporine672
Cyclosporine + Faldaprevir732

[back to top]

Cmax,ss (Maximum Measured Concentration of the FDV [Followed by Tac Treatment] in Plasma at Steady State Over a Uniform Dosing Interval τ)

"Cmax,ss (maximum measured concentration of the FDV [followed by tac treatment] in plasma at steady state over a uniform dosing interval τ).~PK sampling (relative to the first tac administration [h:min]):~period 2 For FDV~-144:00h, -120:00h, -96:00h, -72:00h, -48:00h, -24:00h, -23:30h, -23:00h, -22:30h, -22:00h, -21:00h, -20:00h, -18:00h, -16:00h, -14:00h, -12:00h, -8:00h, 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h, 120:00h, 144:00h, 168:00h." (NCT02016625)
Timeframe: up to 168 hours (details in description)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Faldaprevir3120
Tacrolimus + Faldaprevir2930

[back to top]

Cmax,ss (Maximum Measured Concentration of the FDV [Followed by Cyclo Treatment] in Plasma at Steady State Over a Uniform Dosing Interval τ)

"Cmax,ss (maximum measured concentration of the FDV [followed by cyclo treatment] in plasma at steady state over a uniform dosing interval τ).~PK sampling (relative to the first cyclo administration [h:min]):~period 2 For FDV~-144:00h, -120:00h, -96:00h, -72:00h, -48:00h, -24:00h, -23:30h, -23:00h, -22:30h, -22:00h, -21:00h, -20:00h, -18:00h, -16:00h, -14:00h, -12:00h, -8:00h, 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h, 120:00h, 144:00h, 168:00h" (NCT02016625)
Timeframe: up to 168 hours (details in description)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Faldaprevir1740
Cyclosporine + Faldaprevir2470

[back to top]

Cmax (Maximum Measured Concentration of the Cyclo in Plasma)

"Cmax (maximum measured concentration of the cyclo in plasma).~PK sampling (relative to the first cyclo administration [h:min]):~Period 1: for cyclo 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h period 2 for cyclo 0:00h, 0:30h, 1:00h, 1:30h, 2:00h, 3:00h, 4:00h, 6:00h, 8:00h, 10:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, 24:00h, 48:00h, 72:00h, 96:00h, 120:00h, 144:00h, 168:00h" (NCT02016625)
Timeframe: up to 168 hours (details in description)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cyclosporine172
Cyclosporine + Faldaprevir164

[back to top]

Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

Percentage of participants who developed grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute GVHD. Acute GVHD is defined by the Przepiorka criteria, which stages the degree of organ involvement in the skin, liver, and gastrointestinal (GI) tract, based on severity, with Stage 1+ being least severe and stage 4+ being the most severe. Grading of acute GVHD is as follows: Grade I (skin involvement stages 1+ to 2+, with no liver or GI involvement), Grade II (skin involvement stages 1+ to 3+, liver 1+, GI tract 1+), Grade III (skin involvement stages 2+ to 3+, liver 1+, GI tract 2+ to 4+), Grade IV (skin involvement stages 4+, Liver 4+). (NCT02080195)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grades II-IV acute GVHDGrades III-IV acute GVHD
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMT00

[back to top]

Survival

Number of patients alive and alive without relapse, respectively. (NCT02080195)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Overall SurvivalEvent Free Survival
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMT11

[back to top]

The Feasibility of the Conditioning Regimen and Post Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Refractory SLE Patients With Donors Having Various Degrees of Matching

Number of participants who were alive at 1 year after transplant and who had not suffered graft rejection, acute or chronic GVHD, or Grade 3 or higher (CTCAE V4.0) adverse events. (NCT02080195)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMT1

[back to top]

Graft Failure

Number of participants with primary and/or secondary graft failure. (NCT02080195)
Timeframe: 60 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Primary graft failureSecondary graft failure
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMT00

[back to top]

Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

"Percentage of participants who developed chronic GVHD as defined by the NIH consensus criteria. This system gives scores from 0 to 3 for Karnofsky performance score, skin, mouth, eyes, gastrointestinal, liver, lungs, joints, and genitals, as well as an overall severity (mild, moderate, or severe).~Mild chronic GVHD involves only 1 or 2 organs or sites (except the lung), with no clinically significant functional impairment (maximum of score 1 in all affected organs or sites).~Moderate chronic GVHD involves 1) at least 1 organ or site with clinically significant but no major disability (maximum score of 2 in any affected organ or site) OR 2) 3 or more organs or sites with no clinically significant functional impairment (maximum score of 1 in all affected organs or sites).~Severe chronic GVHD indicates major disability caused by chronic GVHD (score of 3 in any organ or site)." (NCT02080195)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMT0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR) Acute Rejection (AR), Graft Loss (GL) or Death (D)

Participants were assessed for tBPAR, AR, GL or death. For all suspected rejection episodes, regardless of initiation of anti-rejection treatment, a liver biopsy was to be performed preferably within 24 hours, latest within 48 hours whenever clinically possible. A treated biopsy proven acute rejection was considered an episode of acute rejection when demonstrated by local pathology reading with a rejection activity index of at least 3 or greater of acute rejection index and when treated with anti-rejection therapy. The allograft was considered lost on the day the subject was re-transplanted or died due to liver failure. (NCT02115113)
Timeframe: At 12 and 18 months post-transplant

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
tBPAR, 12 monthsAR, 12 monthsGL, 12 monthsDeath, 12 monthstBPAR, 18 monthsAR, 18 monthsGL, 18 monthsDeath, 18 months
Group A (Tacrolimus Elimination Arm)22012201
Group B (Tacrolimus Minimization Arm)11001101

[back to top]

Renal Function Assessed by Estimated Glomerular Filtartion Rate (eGFR)

"Renal function was assessed by eGFR using the MDRD-4 formula at 12 months after transplant:~eGFR = 186.3 * (serum creatinine)-1.154 * age-0.203 * (0.742 for women) * (1.21 if African American) where serum creatinine was in mg/dL and age in years." (NCT02115113)
Timeframe: At 12 months post-transplant

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Least Squares Mean)
Group A (Tacrolimus Elimination Arm)85.50
Group B (Tacrolimus Minimization Arm)80.26

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Serum Creatinine at 12 Months Post-transplant

Blood samples were collected to assess serum creatinine. (NCT02115113)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 months post-transplant

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Group A (Tacrolimus Elimination Arm)-0.11
Group B (Tacrolimus Minimization Arm)-0.05

[back to top]

Graft Survival

Graft survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier Method procedures at 66 months (phase II) and 30 months (phase III). The two-sided 95% confidence intervals for the estimated rates of patients free from graft loss at EOS was calculated using Greenwood's formula. Graft loss was defined as re-transplantation or death. For kidney transplantation graft loss was also defined as nephrectomy or return to long-term dialysis. The date of graft loss is the earliest date of either of these events. Start, event and censor times for the Kaplan-Meier analyses of graft survival were (Event time: day of death, Censor Time: day of last follow-up (for participants prematurely withdrawn from the study), and day of last visit (for participants completing the study) . (NCT02118896)
Timeframe: Up to 5.5 years ((66 months (phase II) and 30 months (phase III)).

Interventionsurvival probability (Number)
FG-506-11-010.9092
FG-506E-12-011.0000
FG-506E-12-020.9217
FG-506-15-020.9031
FG-506E-11-030.9536
FG-506E-12-030.9469
PMR-EC-11051.0000
PMR-EC-12050.9898
PMR-EC-12091.0000
PMR-EC-1210NA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. An AE was, therefore, any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use the study drug, whether or not related to the study drug. Causally-related is defined as a highly probably, probably, possible, not assessable or missing relationship as assessed by the investigator. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Resulted in death, was life threatening: did not refer to event which hypothetically might have caused death if more severe); resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; required inpatient hospitalization/led to prolongation of hospitalization (treatment/observation/examination caused by AE was considered serious); other medically important events. (NCT02118896)
Timeframe: From first dose to duration of participation in the study (up to 6 years and 28 days after EOS).

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants with adverse events (Number)
Adverse eventsCausally related adverse eventsSerious adverse eventsCausally related serious adverse eventsDeaths
FG-506-11-01474736224
FG-506-15-02735643216
FG-506E-11-0313011267313
FG-506E-12-01474231160
FG-506E-12-02674440154
FG-506E-12-0318013264301
PMR-EC-110558331350
PMR-EC-120559291670
PMR-EC-120962211520
PMR-EC-12101NA2NA0

[back to top]

Participant Survival

Participant survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) method procedures at 66 months (phase 2) and 24 months (phase III). The two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the estimated rates of patients alive at end of study (EOS) was calculated using Greenwood's formula. Start, event and censor times for the Kaplan-Meier analyses of participant survival were (Event time: day of death, Censor Time: day of last follow-up (for participants prematurely withdrawn from the study), and day of last visit (for participants completing the study) . (NCT02118896)
Timeframe: Up to 5.5 years (66 months (phase II) and 24 months (phase III)).

Interventionsurvival probability (Number)
FG-506-11-010.9092
FG-506E-12-011.0000
FG-506E-12-020.9356
FG-506-15-020.9031
FG-506E-11-030.9536
FG-506E-12-030.9933
PMR-EC-11051.000
PMR-EC-12051.000
PMR-EC-12091.000
PMR-EC-1210NA

[back to top]

Time to First BCAR Episode

The time to first acute rejection episode was defined as the number of days from day 1 (defined as the day of study enrollment) to the first clinical, laboratory or histological signs that were considered to be related to the first acute rejection episode. (NCT02118896)
Timeframe: Up to 1344 days (3.75 years).

Interventiondays (Mean)
FG-506-11-01479.3
FG-506E-12-01358
FG-506-15-02601.2
FG-506E-11-0389.6
FG-506E-12-031
PMR-EC-1209192

[back to top]

Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection (BCAR) Episodes

"FAS population. Evaluation of biopsy specimens performed by local histopathologist following Histological Grading of Biopsies for Rejection using grading relevant to type of organ allograft. Spontaneously resolving AR defined as episode not treated with new/increased corticosteroid medication, antibodies/any other medication and resolved irrespective of any MR4/MMF/azathioprine dose changes; corticosteroid sensitive AR was an episode which was treated with new/increased corticosteroid medication only and resolved, irrespective of any MR4, MMF or azathioprine dose changes; corticosteroid resistant AR was an episode which did not resolve following treatment with corticosteroids, if it was not treated with corticosteroids first but only with antibodies, it was included in this category; corticosteroid resistant AR episodes were further classified into episodes which resolved with further treatment and those which did not respond to further treatment/were ongoing at EOS/withdrawal." (NCT02118896)
Timeframe: Up to 6 years.

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants with with BCAR episodes (Number)
BCAR episodesIn male subjects N=36,27,48,64,91,117,61,80,52,5In female subjects N=11,20,19,15,39,74,24,27,36,4BCAR episodes with spontaneous resolutionCorticosteriod sensitive BCAR episodesCorticosteroid resistant BCAR episodesMild histological grade of BCAR episodesModerate histological grade of BCAR episodesSevere histological grade of BCAR episodesUnknown histological grade of BCAR episodes
FG-506-11-013211202010
FG-506-15-029904514420
FG-506E-11-035322302210
FG-506E-12-013120211201
FG-506E-12-020000000000
FG-506E-12-031010101001
PMR-EC-11050000000000
PMR-EC-12050000000000
PMR-EC-12091100010100
PMR-EC-12100000000000

[back to top]

Efficacy Failure

Efficacy failure was defined as BCAR, graft loss, death, or an unknown outcome at the end of the study period. Start, event and censor times for the Kaplan-Meier analyses of efficacy failure were (Event time: onset of first episode of BCAR, graft loss, or death after study start, Censor Time: day of withdrawal (for participants prematurely withdrawn from the study), and day of last visit (for participants completing the study). No Kaplan-Meier estimates for PMR-EC-1210 due to the short subject participation period and the low number of subjects (NCT02118896)
Timeframe: Up to 5.75 years ((69 months (phase II) and 33 months (phase III)).

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants with efficacy failure (Number)
Failure during the studyFailure after withdrawalFailure cause during study: BCAR:Acute respiratory failure:Astrocytoma:Chronic allograft dysfunction:Hepatic cirrhosis:Hypoglycemia:Increased creatinine:Cerebrovascular accident:Lymphoma:Lung neoplasm:Operative hemorrhage:Pulmonary embolism:Renal insufficiency:Sudden death:Cardiac disorder:Hepatic insufficiency:Hemolytic/uremic syndrome:Esophageal varices hemorrhage:Urethral stenosisFailure cause after withdrawal: Lost to follow-up
FG-506-11-016131110000000000000001
FG-506-15-0215090001100100111000000
FG-506E-11-038250000000000000110102
FG-506E-12-013230000000000000000002
FG-506E-12-025100000011011100000001
FG-506E-12-036020020000000000100010
PMR-EC-11050000000000000000000000
PMR-EC-12051000000000000000001000
PMR-EC-12091010000000000000000000
PMR-EC-12100000000000000000000000

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Non-relapse Mortality

Cumulative incidence (measured as a percentage) of non-relapse mortality at 180 days following myeloablative, Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-mismatched bone marrow transplant (BMT) for patients with high risk hematologic malignancies. (NCT02120157)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionpercent (Number)
Haploidentical BMT With PTCy for Acute Leukemias and MDS0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Donor Cell Engraftment

Number of Participants with Donor Cell Engraftment at Day 60 following myeloablative, HLA-mismatched BMT. (NCT02120157)
Timeframe: Day 60

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Haploidentical BMT With PTCy for Acute Leukemias and MDS27

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) Grades 2-4 and Grades 3-4

Cumulative incidence (measured as a percentage) of acute GVHD grades 2-4 (overall) and grades 3-4 (severe). (NCT02120157)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionpercent (Number)
Grades 2-4Grades 3-4
Haploidentical BMT With PTCy for Acute Leukemias and MDS100

[back to top]

Primary and Secondary Graft Failure

Incidence (measured as a percentage) of primary and secondary graft failure. (NCT02120157)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of graft failure (Number)
PrimarySecondary
Haploidentical BMT With PTCy for Acute Leukemias and MDS160

[back to top]

Steroid and Non-steroid Immunosuppressants

Number of participants who used steroid and non-steroid immunosuppressants to treat GVHD. (NCT02120157)
Timeframe: Two Years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Steroid immunosuppressantsNon-steroid immunosuppressants
Haploidentical BMT With PTCy for Acute Leukemias and MDS42

[back to top]

Steroid and Non-steroid Immunosuppressants Use Duration

Duration of use of steroid and non-steroid immunosuppressants (in months) to treat GVHD. (NCT02120157)
Timeframe: Two Years

Interventionmonths (Number)
Steroid immunosuppressantsNon-steroid immunosuppressants
Haploidentical BMT With PTCy for Acute Leukemias and MDS1819

[back to top]

Survival

Estimate incidence of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), event-free survival, and relapse-free GVHD-free survival (GRFS) in patients receiving myeloablative, HLA-mismatched BMT for patients with high risk hematologic malignancies at 1 year. Incidence as a percentage. (NCT02120157)
Timeframe: up to 1 years

Interventionpercent (Number)
overall survival (OS)progression-free survival (PFS)disease-free survival (DFS)event-free survivalRelapse-free GVHD-free survival (GRFS)
Haploidentical BMT With PTCy for Acute Leukemias and MDS7768686865

[back to top]

Incidence of Donor Cell Engraftment

Incidence of donor cell engraftment measured as the percentage of donor cell engraftment. (NCT02120157)
Timeframe: 60 days

Interventionpercentage of donor cell engraftment (Number)
Haploidentical BMT With PTCy for Acute Leukemias and MDS84

[back to top]

Survival

Estimate incidence of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), event-free survival, and relapse-free GVHD-free survival (GRFS) in patients receiving myeloablative, HLA-mismatched BMT for patients with high risk hematologic malignancies at 2 years. Incidence as a percentage. (NCT02120157)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionpercent (Number)
overall survival (OS)progression-free survival (PFS)disease-free survival (DFS)event-free survivalRelapse-free GVHD-free survival (GRFS)
Haploidentical BMT With PTCy for Acute Leukemias and MDS7364646452

[back to top]

Time to Neutrophil and Platelet Recovery

Time to neutrophil and platelet recovery in median days (NCT02120157)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventiondays (Median)
neutrophilplatelet
Haploidentical BMT With PTCy for Acute Leukemias and MDS2221

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD

Cumulative incidence (measured as a percentage) of chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD). (NCT02120157)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercent (Number)
Haploidentical BMT With PTCy for Acute Leukemias and MDS11

[back to top]

Participants Experiencing Acute Rejection Episode

(NCT02123108)
Timeframe: 12 months post liver transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Basiliximab3
Tacrolimus Group4

[back to top]

Participants Experiencing Graft Failure

(NCT02123108)
Timeframe: 12 months post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Basiliximab2
Tacrolimus Group5

[back to top]

Renal Recovery/ Function

Number of participants who experienced dialysis independence or improvement based upon kidney function labs as a measure of renal recovery/ function following OLT in patients after undergoing orthotopic liver transplant (NCT02123108)
Timeframe: 12 months post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Basiliximab28
Tacrolimus Group26

[back to top]

Participants Experiencing Adverse Event Attributable to Study Drug

(NCT02123108)
Timeframe: 12 months post liver transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Basiliximab0
Tacrolimus Group0

[back to top]

Survival

Participants at risk minus incidence of death within the first year post-transplant (NCT02123108)
Timeframe: 12 months post liver transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Basiliximab28
Tacrolimus Group26

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Percentage of participants with SAEs up to 24 months post-transplant (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months Post-Transplant

InterventionPercentage of participants with SAEs (Number)
Treatment A52.0
Treatment B60.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes After Transplant

Percentage of participants with New Onset Diabetes After Transplantation (NODAT) at 6, 12, and 24 months post-transplant. (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Up to 6 MonthsUp to 12 MonthsUp to 24 Months
Treatment A11.511.515.4
Treatment B6.36.312.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Percentage of participants with AEs up to 24 months post-transplant (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months Post-Transplant

InterventionPercentage of participants with AEs (Number)
Treatment A100.0
Treatment B97.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Particpants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (LTAs)

Percentage of participants with laboratory tests with marked laboratory abnormalities (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: At 24 Months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Hemoglobin (Low)Leukocytes (low)Lymphocyte (Absolute) (low)Neutrophils (Absolute) (low)Aspartate Aminotransferase (High)Creatinine (High)Inorganic Phosphorus (low)Potassium (high)Sodium (low)Albumin (low)Glucose (high)Triglycerides (high)Uric Acid (high)
Treatment A12.0084.004.016.024.04.04.008.012.08.0
Treatment B6.13.069.73.003.012.1003.012.100

[back to top]

Time to Event: Graft Loss and Death

The Number of days to participant Graft Loss and death for any reason (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up to 728 Days

,
InterventionDays (Number)
Graft Loss
Treatment A107
Treatment B2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With De Novo Donor Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies (DSA)

Characterization of any de novo DSA detected by IgM and IgG subclasses, and by the presence or absence of complement fixing properties. (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
InterventionPercentage (Number)
Baseline Class 1 DSABaseline Class 2 DSABaseline Both Class 1 and 2 DSADe Novo 12 Month Class 1 DSADe Novo 12 Month Class 2 DSADe Novo 12 Month Both Class 1 and 2 DSADe Novo 24 Month Class 1 DSADe Novo 24 Month Class 2 DSADe Novo 24 Month Both Class 1 and 2 DSA
Treatment A1000000000
Treatment B0000003.4500

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Donor Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies (DSA)

Percentage of participants with, and titers of pre-existing (pre-transplant) DSA on Day 1 (pre-transplant, pre-dose), and at Months 12 and 24 posttransplant (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Baseline Class 1 DSABaseline Class 2 DSABaseline Both Class 1 and 2 DSA12 Month Class 1 DSA12 Month Class 2 DSA12 Month Both Class 1 and 2 DSA24 Month Class 1 DSA24 Month Class 2 DSA24 Month Both Class 1 and 2 DSA
Treatment A10008.00008.0000
Treatment B00003.0303.033.030

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With BANFF Grade by Severity Grades. BANFF Type (Grade) for Acute/Active Rejection

"Treatment differences in the severity grades to treat all episodes of CSBPAR at 6, 12, and 24 months post-transplant.~Type 1A - Cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis (>4 mononuclear cells/Tubular cross section or group of 10 Tubular cell). Type 1B - Cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis (>10 mononuclear cells/Tubular cross section or group of 10 Tubular cell).Type 2A - Cases with mild to moderate intimal arteritis.Type 2B - Cases with severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area. Type 3 - Cases with transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (v3 with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation)" (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: At 6, 12 and 24 Months

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
6 Months: Mild Acute (1A)6 Months: Mild Acute (1B)6 Months: Moderate Acute (2A)6 Months: Moderate Acute (2B)6 Months: Severe Acute12 Months: Mild Acute (1A)12 Months: Mild Acute (1B)12 Months: Moderate Acute (2A)12 Months: Moderate Acute (2B)12 Months: Severe Acute24 Months: Mild Acute (1A)24 Months: Mild Acute (1B)24 Months: Moderate Acute (2A)24 Months: Moderate Acute (2B)24 Months: Severe Acute
Treatment A3.807.7007.707.70011.507.700
Treatment B03.16.3003.13.16.3003.13.16.300

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Survive With a Functioning Graft

Number of all participants who survive with a functioning graft at 6, 12 and 24 months post transplant (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: At 6, 12 and 24 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
At 6 MonthsAt 12 MonthsAt 24 Months
Treatment A252525
Treatment B313131

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Graft Loss Post Transplant

Number of all participants who experience graft loss at 6, 12 and 24 months post transplant (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: At 6, 12 and 24 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
At 6 MonthsAt 12 MonthsAt 24 Months
Treatment A111
Treatment B111

[back to top]

Number of Participants Deaths Post Transplant

Number of participant deaths at 6, 12 and 24 months post transplant (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
At 6 MonthsAt 12 MonthsAt 24 Months
Treatment A000
Treatment B000

[back to top]

Median Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR)

Median cGFR values at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-transplant, as determined from the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up 24 Months post-transplant

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Median)
At 3 MonthsAt 6 MonthsAt 12 MonthsAt 24 Months
Treatment A64.064.066.073.5
Treatment B62.067.062.568.0

[back to top]

Mean Changes From Baseline Values of Lipid Values

"Mean changes from baseline values in the following:~Serum total cholesterol (TC) Serum high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol Serum low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol Serum triglycerides (TG)" (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: at months 12 and 24

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
TC Month 12TC Month 24HDL Month 12HDL Month 24LDL Month 12LDL Month 24TG Month 12TG Month 24
Treatment A25.726.65.46.225.717.43.3106.8
Treatment B-2.810.01.94.810.815.7-86.1-13.6

[back to top]

Mean Changes From Baseline Values for Blood Pressure

Mean changes from baseline values for SBP and DBP at 6, 12 and 24 months post-transplant (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Diastolic Month 6Systolic Month 6Diastolic Month 12Systolic Month 12Diastolic Month 24Systolic Month 24
Treatment A1.0-4.02.3-1.10.9-2.3
Treatment B4.8-0.75.4-3.22.1-4.2

[back to top]

Mean Change From Month 3 in cGFR

The mean change from Month 3 cGFR at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-transplant (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up 24 Months post-transplant

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
At 3 MonthsAt 6 MonthsAt 12 MonthsAt 24 Months
Treatment A0-3.2-3.13.1
Treatment B02.81.46.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Clinically-suspected Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (CSBPAR) at 6 Months

Number of Participants with Clinically-suspected biopsy-proven acute rejection (CSBPAR) at 6 Months (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: 6 Months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment A7.7
Treatment B9.4

[back to top]

Treatment Differences in Therapeutic Modalities

Treatment Received for Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (Banff Grade IA or Higher), or Humoral (Antibody Mediated) Rejection Treatment regimen: Categorical analysis of CSBPAR episodes by treatment received. (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: at 6, 12 and 24 Months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants with CSBPARs (Number)
Corticosteroids (6 months)Lymphocyte depleting agent (6 months)Plasmapheresis (6 months)IVIG (6 months)Rituximab (6 months)Corticosteroids (12 months)Lymphocyte depleting agent (12 months)Plasmapheresis (12 months)IVIG (12 months)Rituximab (12 months)Corticosteroids (24 months)Lymphocyte depleting agent (24 months)Plasmapheresis (24 months)IVIG (24 months)Rituximab (24 months)
Treatment A7.7000015.43.800019.23.8000
Treatment B9.46.303.1012.56.303.1012.56.303.10

[back to top]

Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio (UPr/Cr)

Urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPr/Cr) at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-transplant. (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up 24 Months post-transplant

,
Interventionmg Protein/mg Creatinine (Mean)
At 3 MonthsAt 6 MonthsAt 12 MonthsAt 24 Months
Treatment A0.31460.38960.28350.3940
Treatment B0.14120.14610.18490.1685

[back to top]

Mean and Mean Change From Baseline in Whole Blood HbA1c

Mean whole blood HbA1C concentrations, and mean changes from baseline values at Months 6, 12 and 24 months post-transplant. (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Mean Value at 6 monthsChange from baseline at 6 monthsMean Value at 12 monthsChange from baseline at 12 monthsMean Value at 24 monthsChange from baseline at 24 months
Treatment A6.110.346.180.476.240.66
Treatment B6.130.486.210.326.290.41

[back to top]

Mean and Mean Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose

Mean fasting blood glucose levels, and mean changes from baseline values at Months 6, 12 and 24 months post- transplant (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Mean Value at 6 monthsChange from baseline at 6 monthsMean Value at 12 monthsChange from baseline at 12 monthsMean Value at 24 monthsChange from baseline at 24 months
Treatment A107.24.9101.1-1.3127.522.3
Treatment B107.24.8127.520.6111.815.0

[back to top]

Clinically-suspected Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (CSBPAR) at 6, 12 and 24 Months

"Clinically-suspected biopsy-proven acute rejection (CSBPAR) at 6, 12 and 24 Months~Change in the incidence of CSBPAR at 6, 12 and 24 months post transplant, in the belatacept + EVL(Treatment A) as compared to TAC + MMF (Treatment B)." (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
InterventionPercentage of CSBPAR (Number)
CSBPAR at 6 MonthsCSBPAR at 12 monthsCSBPAR at 24 Months
Treatment A7.711.515.4
Treatment B9.412.512.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Events of Special Interest (ESIs)

"Percentage of participants which have one of the following events of special interest:~Serious Infections Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) Malignancies (Other than PTLD) including non-melanoma skin carcinomas (Malignancies) Tuberculosis Infections Central Nervous System (CNS) Infections Viral Infections Infusion Related reactions within 24 hours since belatacept infusion" (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants with ESIs (Number)
Serious InfectionsPTLDPMLMalignanciesTBCNS InfectionsViral InfectionsInfusion Related Reactions
Treatment A164.004.00001
Treatment B15.23.003.00000

[back to top]

Absolute Values of Fasting Lipid Values: Median

"Absolute (mean and median) values at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-transplant for the following:~Serum total cholesterol (TC) Serum high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol Serum low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol Serum triglycerides (TG)" (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Median)
TC Month 3TC Month 6TC Month 12TC Month 24HDL Month 3HDL Month 6HDL Month 12HDL Month 24LDL Month 3LDL Month 6LDL Month 12LDL Month 24TG Month 3TG Month 6TG Month 12TG Month 24
Treatment A167.0187.0184.0193.045.045.550.049.089.099.5104.0103.5147.0157.5154.0159.0
Treatment B173.0178.0171.5166.049.049.047.049.095.0100.091.586.0128.0126.0130.0114.0

[back to top]

Absolute Values of Fasting Lipid Values: Mean

"Absolute (mean and median) values at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-transplant for the following:~Serum total cholesterol (TC) Serum high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol Serum low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol Serum triglycerides (TG)" (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
TC Month 3TC Month 6TC Month 12TC Month 24HDL Month 3HDL Month 6HDL Month 12HDL Month 24LDL Month 3LDL Month 6LDL Month 12LDL Month 24TG Month 3TG Month 6TG Month 12TG Month 24
Treatment A181.2197.7189.0193.250.646.449.450.196.9115.2107.597.9171.6180.0162.4263.4
Treatment B174.4175169.9168.250.453.949.651.396.593.788.091.5137.8138.3161.3145.0

[back to top]

Absolute Values of Blood Pressure: Median

Absolute (mean and median) values for SBP and DBP at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months posttransplant; (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
InterventionmmHg (Median)
Diastolic Month 3Systolic Month 3Diastolic Month 6Systolic Month 6Diastolic Month 12Systolic Month 12Diastolic Month 24Systolic Month 24
Treatment A78.5135.575.5127.077.0130.078.0130.0
Treatment B80.0131.080.0131.081.0126.079.0130.0

[back to top]

Absolute Values of Blood Pressure: Mean

Absolute (mean and median) values for SBP and DBP at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months posttransplant; (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Diastolic Month 3Systolic Month 3Diastolic Month 6Systolic Month 6Diastolic Month 12Systolic Month 12Diastolic Month 24Systolic Month 24
Treatment A78.7134.277.4128.178.7131.078.1130.9
Treatment B77.7131.079.4133.080.1131.078.5131.7

[back to top]

Absolute Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR): Mean

Absolute (mean and median) cGFR values at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-transplant, as determined from the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up 24 Months post-transplant

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
At 3 MonthsAt 6 MonthsAt 12 MonthsAt 24 Months
Treatment A69.266.066.271.8
Treatment B62.263.962.068.7

[back to top]

Time to Clinically-suspected Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (CSBPAR).

Time to Clinically suspected biopsy proven acute rejection (NCT02137239)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

InterventionMonths (Mean)
Treatment ANA
Treatment BNA

[back to top]

Phase II: Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Overall Survival Time

The time from day 0 to the day of death from any cause. Subjects who receive all 4 doses of carfilzomib at the maximum tolerated dose level will be considered evaluable for endpoint analysis. (NCT02145403)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1 year since transplant3 years since transplant
Dose Level 3 - Maximum Dose Carfilzomib 36 mg/m^27254

[back to top]

Phase II: Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Progression/Relapse-free Survival Time

Time from day 0 to the date of the first progression/relapse. Subjects who receive all 4 doses of carfilzomib at the maximum tolerated dose level will be considered evaluable for endpoint analysis. (NCT02145403)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1 year since transplant3 years since transplant
Dose Level 3 - Maximum Dose Carfilzomib 36 mg/m^27240

[back to top]

"Phase II: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Patients Who Are Alive and Have Not Developed Any Event"

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients who are alive and have not developed relapse/progression of primary disease or clinical grade III-IV acute graft-versus- host disease (GVHD) or chronic GVHD requiring systemic treatment. Subjects who receive all 4 doses of carfilzomib at the maximum tolerated dose level will be considered evaluable for endpoint analysis. (NCT02145403)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose Level 3 - Maximum Dose Carfilzomib 36 mg/m^2 IV31

[back to top] [back to top]

Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Carfilzomib

Subjects were enrolled on the first dose level (20 mg/m^2), following a standard 3+3 dose escalation. For any given dose level, if none of the 3 subjects developed a treatment-related dose limiting toxicity (DLT), defined per protocol, dose escalation would follow. If a DLT occurred in any given dose level, the cohort would be expanded to 6. Further dose escalation would be made only if DLTs occurred in <2 out of 6 subjects. If >=2 of 6 develop DLTs, dose de-escalation would be made to the previous level. The highest dose level at which no more than one of six participants experience a DLT defines the MTD. (NCT02145403)
Timeframe: Up to day 28

Interventionmilligrams per square meter (mg/m^2) (Number)
Phase 1 Study Participants36

[back to top]

Phase II: Cumulative Incidence of Acute GVHD

The cumulative incidence of acute Graft Versus Host Disease (aGVHD). Events were assigned a severity grade using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v. 4.0; lower values indicate least severe and higher values indicate most severe. Grades 2 - 4 and grades 3 - 4 events are reported. Subjects who receive all 4 doses of carfilzomib at the maximum tolerated dose level will be considered evaluable for endpoint analysis. (NCT02145403)
Timeframe: At day 180 post-transplant; data collected up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Acute GVHD grade 2-4Acute GVHD grade 3-4
Dose Level 3 - Maximum Dose Carfilzomib 36 mg/m^23215

[back to top]

Phase II: Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD

The cumulative incidence of chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD). Subjects who receive all 4 doses of carfilzomib at the maximum tolerated dose level will be considered evaluable for endpoint analysis. (NCT02145403)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
cGVHD overall: Day 180cGVHD overall: Day 365cGVHD overall: Day 1095cGVHD Moderate / Severe: Day 180cGVHD Moderate / Severe: Day 365cGVHD Moderate / Severe: Day 1095cGVHD Requiring Systemic Therapy: Day 180cGVHD Requiring Systemic Therapy: Day 365cGVHD Requiring Systemic Therapy: Day 1095
Dose Level 3 - Maximum Dose Carfilzomib 36 mg/m^22151521010277

[back to top]

Phase II: Cumulative Incidence of Non-relapse Mortality

The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality. Subjects who receive all 4 doses of carfilzomib at the maximum tolerated dose level will be considered evaluable for endpoint analysis. (NCT02145403)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 180Day 365Day 1095
Dose Level 3 - Maximum Dose Carfilzomib 36 mg/m^2151723

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Delayed Graft Function (DGF)

"To assess whether treatment with Thymoglobulin induction and belatacept based maintenance immunosuppression would reduce delayed graft function (DGF) rates among recipients of deceased donor renal transplants as measured by clinical findings and NGAL marker, as specified below and defined by others. This will be compared to the incidence of DGF in patients treated with a Tacrolimus based regimen.~Patients who require hemodialysis in the first 7 days after transplantation and/or patients whose serum creatinine decreases <10% during 3 consecutive days after the transplant will be considered to have DGF in the absence of other confounding factors such as obstruction or infection. NGAL will be used as a verification marker of DGF." (NCT02152345)
Timeframe: Up to 3 months post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Belatacept Immunosuppression12
Standard Immunosuppression (Tacrolimus)15

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Allograft Survival

Allograft survival is defined as functioning renal transplant. (NCT02152345)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Belatacept Immunosuppression24
Standard Immunosuppression (Tacrolimus)21

[back to top]

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is based on a blood sample (serum creatinine value), age, race, and gender. eGFR estimates best the function of the kidney at any one time. (NCT02152345)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Belatacept Immunosuppression46
Standard Immunosuppression (Tacrolimus)41

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Allograft Rejection Episode

All rejection episodes will be confirmed by renal transplant biopsy provoked by change in renal function not explained by other clinical causes. (NCT02152345)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Belatacept Immunosuppression7
Standard Immunosuppression (Tacrolimus)11

[back to top]

Anti-Tumor Response Rate

"This is measurement is summarized via bone marrow biopsy results and blood assays through 3 years.~Anti-tumor response is assessed according to Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR.org) criteria.~For multiple myeloma, based on assessment of serum and urine immunofixation, the presence or absence of soft tissue plasmacytomas and analyses of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy samples, response categories include stringent complete remission (sCR), complete remission (CR), near CR (nCR) very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD).~For AL amyloidosis, based on assessment of serum and urine immunofixation and serum free light chain ratio, hematologic response categories include complete response, very good partial response, partial response, no response/stable disease and progressive disease. Organ responses are also assessed according to organ specific criteria." (NCT02158052)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow and Kidney RECIPIENTS1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Without Renal Allograft Rejection at 6 Months Post-transplant

The Primary Outcome is: the incidence of renal allograft rejection at 6 months post-transplant (NCT02158052)
Timeframe: 6 Months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow and Kidney RECIPIENTS1

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Attributable to the Donor Alloantigen Reactive Tregs (darTregs) Infusion

"AEs classified by the site investigator/clinician as possibly or definitely related to the study treatment, the Donor Alloantigen Reactive Tregs (darTregs) infusion. These AEs include:~infusion reaction~Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome (Reference: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0 (4/28/2009) grading criteria~malignant cellular transformation." (NCT02188719)
Timeframe: Transplantation to 40 Weeks Post Transplantation

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Cohort 20

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Wound Complication(s) Adverse Event(s)

"The severity of adverse events (AEs) was classified into grades using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0 (4/28/2009):~Grade 3 wound complications are defined as Hernia without evidence of strangulation; fascial disruption/dehiscence; primary wound closure or revision by operative intervention indicated~Grade 4 complications are defined as Hernia with evidence of strangulation; major reconstruction flap, grafting, resection, or amputation indicated" (NCT02188719)
Timeframe: Transplantation to 40 Weeks Post Transplantation

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Cohort 10
Cohort 20

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy-Proven Acute and/or Chronic Rejection

"Biopsy-proven acute rejection graded as Mild, Moderate or Severe, per 1997 Banff classification. Chronic Rejection graded using Banff 2000 classification.~References: 1.) Banff Schema for Grading Liver Allograft Rejection: An International Consensus Document developed by an international panel of experts in liver transplantation pathology, hepatology, and surgery (Hepatology 1997; 25(3): 658-663). 2.) Update of the International Banff Schema for Liver Allograft Rejection: Working Recommendations for the Histopathologic Staging and Reporting of Chronic Rejection (Hepatology 2000; 31(3): 792-799)." (NCT02188719)
Timeframe: Transplantation to 40 Weeks Post Transplantation

,
InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Mild Acute RejectionModerate Acute RejectionSevere Acute RejectionChronic Rejection
Cohort 10000
Cohort 211.1000

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Infectious Adverse Event(s)

"The severity of infectious adverse events (AEs) was classified into grades as follows:~Grade 1 = asymptomatic; clinical or diagnostic observation only; intervention with oral antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral agent only; no invasive intervention required~Grade 2 = symptomatic; intervention with intravenous antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral agent; invasive intervention may be required~Grade 3 = any infection associated with hemodynamic compromise requiring pressors; any infection necessitating intensive care unit level of care; any infection necessitating operative intervention; any infection involving the central nervous system; any infection with a positive fungal blood culture; any proven or probable aspergillus infection; any tissue invasive fungal infection; any pneumocystis jiroveci infection~Grade 4 = life-threatening infection~Grade 5 = death resulting from infection" (NCT02188719)
Timeframe: Transplantation to 40 Weeks Post Transplantation

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Cohort 10
Cohort 211.1

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher Hematologic Adverse Events (AEs) of Anemia, Neutropenia, and/or Thrombocytopenia

"The severity of adverse events (AEs) was classified into grades using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0 (4/28/2009):~Grade 1 = mild AE~Grade 2 = moderate AE~Grade 3 = severe and undesirable AE~Grade 4 = life-threatening or disabling AE~Grade 5 = death" (NCT02188719)
Timeframe: Transplantation to 40 Weeks Post Transplantation

,
InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
AnemiaNeutropeniaThrombocytopenia
Cohort 166.716.716.7
Cohort 222.200

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Secondary Graft Failure

"The cumulative incidence of secondary graft failure will be estimated using the Kalbfleisch-Prentice method. Deaths due to toxicity and relapse before day 100 are the competing events.~Secondary graft failure or graft rejection will be defined as no evidence of donor chimerism by umbilical cord blood (UCB) and/or haploidentical donor (<10%), or too few cells to perform adequate chimerism analysis, in research participants with prior neutrophil engraftment.~Due to the early close of the study, a small number of patients were enrolled. Subsequently, the number of patients who experienced secondary graft failure is provided." (NCT02199041)
Timeframe: 100 days after transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment0

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants by Severity With Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) in the First 100 Days After HCT

"Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD was estimated using Kalbfleisch-Prentice method. Death is the competing risk event. SAS macro (bmacro252-Excel2007cin) available at St. Jude was used for analysis. Severity of GVHD and stage were determined using the Clinical Oncology Group (COG) Stem Cell Committee Consensus Guidelines for establishing organ stage and overall grade of acute GVHD. Participants are graded on a scale from I to IV, with I being mild and IV being severe.~Overall Clinical Grade (based on the highest stage obtained):~Grade 0: No stage 1-4 of any organ. Grade I: Stage 1-2 skin and no liver or gut involvement. Grade II: Stage 3 skin, or Stage I liver involvement, or Stage 1 gastrointestinal (GI).~Grade III: Stage 0-3 skin, with Stage 2-3 liver, or Stage 2-3 GI. Grade IV: Stage 4 skin, liver or GI involvement.~Due to early close of study, a small number of patients were enrolled. The number of patients who experienced acute GVHD is provided." (NCT02199041)
Timeframe: 100 days after transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
No Acute GVHDGrade IGrade IIGrade IIIGrade IV
Treatment80121

[back to top]

Number of Participants by Severity With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) in the First 100 Days After HCT

"Cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was estimated using Kalbfleisch-Prentice method. Death is competing risk event. SAS macro (bmacro252-Excel2007cin) available St. Jude was used for such analysis. Severity of chronic GVHD was evaluated using National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Global Severity Scoring. Mild is considered a better outcome with severe being the worst.~Criteria for grading chronic GVHD:~Mild: 1-2 organs/sites, maximum organ score of 1, and lung score of 1. Moderate: 3 or more organs/sites and maximum organ score of 1 and lung score of 1, OR at least 1 organ/site and maximum organ score of 2 and lung score of 1. Severe: At least 1 organ/site and maximum organ score of 3 and lung score of 2-3.~Due to the early close of the study, a small number of patients were enrolled. Subsequently, the number of patients who experienced chronic GVHD is provided." (NCT02199041)
Timeframe: 100 days after transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
No Chronic GVHDMildModerateSevere
Treatment11001

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Neutrophil Engraftment

Neutrophil engraftment is defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery of ≥ 0.5 x 10^9/L (500/mm^3) for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days (derived from either donor). Date of engraftment is the date of the first of the three consecutive laboratory values. The number of patients engrafted by day +42 post-transplant is provided. (NCT02199041)
Timeframe: Until day 42 post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Event-free Survival (EFS)

"The Kaplan-Meier estimate of EFS with relapse, death due to any cause and graft failure as events along with their standard errors will be calculated using the SAS macro (bmacro251-Excel2007kme) available in the Department of Biostatistics at St. Jude, where EFS = min (date of last follow-up, date of relapse, date of graft failure, date of death due to any cause) - date of transplant, and all participants surviving at the time of analysis without events will be censored. The number of participants who did not experience any of these events through one year post-transplant is given.~Due to the early close of the study, a small number of patients were enrolled. Subsequently, the number of patients who did not experience any events defined above is provided." (NCT02199041)
Timeframe: One year after transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Malignant Relapse

"Relapse was evaluated using standard World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for each disease. The estimate of cumulative incidence of relapse will be estimated using Kalbfleisch-Prentice method. Relapse defined as the recurrence of original disease. Death is the competing risk event. The analysis will be implemented using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) macro (bmacro252-Excel2007cin).~Due to the early close of the study, a small number of patients were enrolled. Subsequently, the number of patients who experienced malignant relapse is provided" (NCT02199041)
Timeframe: One year after transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)

"The Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS with relapse, death due to any cause and graft failure as events along with their standard errors will be calculated using the SAS macro (bmacro251-Excel2007kme) available in the Department of Biostatistics at St. Jude, where OS = min (date of last follow-up, date of death) - date of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and all participants surviving after 1 year post-transplant will be considered as censored.~Due to the early close of the study, a small number of patients were enrolled. Subsequently, the number of patients who did not die at 1 year post-transplant is provided." (NCT02199041)
Timeframe: One year after transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment6

[back to top]

Score of Anxiety Symptoms Using the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) Instrument

"Levels of anxiety symptoms will be measured using the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) instrument. (see Watson, 2007). Anxiety will be assessed combining two domain categories of the IDAS (panic and traumatic intrusions). There are seven 5-item, Likert-style questions responding symptom severity during the past 2 weeks, including today ... ranging from 'Not at all' to 'Extremely.' Scores range from 0 to 28 with higher scores indicating worse symptoms." (NCT02206035)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 28, Day 100 and Day 180

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 28Day 100Day 180
Historical Control Arm (Secondary Outcome Measures)15.616.917.416.9
Tacrolimus, Methotrexate and Tocilizumab (Tac/MTX/Toc)16.017.519.218.6

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Not Experiencing Grade II-IV Acute Graph Versus Host Disease (aGVHD)

This measure is the number of subjects who did not experience grade II-IV aGVHD at or before day 180 comparing recipients of tacrolimus (Tac), methotrexate (MTX), and tocilizumab (Toc) to a contemporary control population abstracted from a database maintained by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). The staging of aGVHD was according to the criteria of Przepiorka, et al., 1995 which assigns a score to the clinical status of multiple organ systems aggregated to determine the clinical stage. A higher stage indicates more severe aGVHD symptoms and poorer clinical outcome. (NCT02206035)
Timeframe: Day 180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tacrolimus, Methotrexate and Tocilizumab (Tac/MTX/Toc)3
Historical Control Arm (Primary Outcome Measure)18
Historical Control Arm (Secondary Outcome Measures)0

[back to top]

Score of Depressive Symptoms Using General Depressive Subscale of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) Instrument

"The measure of depressive symptoms will be determined from the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) instrument. The IDAS contains 10 specific symptom scales: Suicidality, Lassitude, Insomnia, Appetite Loss, Appetite Gain, Ill Temper, Well-Being, Panic, Social Anxiety, and Traumatic Intrusions (see Watson, 2007). The General Depression subscale of the IDAS and includes a subset of 20 five-item Likert-style questions (1= Not at All to 5-= Extremely) with a scoring range of 20-100. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms." (NCT02206035)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 28, Day 100 and Day 180

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 28Day 100Day 180
Historical Control Arm (Secondary Outcome Measures)38.940.340.438.9
Tacrolimus, Methotrexate and Tocilizumab (Tac/MTX/Toc)34.842.739.538.6

[back to top]

Score of Pain Symptoms Using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Instrument (Interference)

Levels of interference in activities due to pain symptoms will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) instrument. The BPI Interference scale is a mean of 7 eleven-item Likert-style questions with a range of 0-10 (0 = Does not interfere to 10 = Completely interferes). Higher scores indicate greater interference in daily activities due to pain symptoms (see Cleeland 1994). (NCT02206035)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 28, Day 100 and Day 180

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 28Day 100Day 180
Historical Control Arm (Secondary Outcome Measures)1.81.72.22.3
Tacrolimus, Methotrexate and Tocilizumab (Tac/MTX/Toc)1.52.01.61.6

[back to top]

Score of Sleep Symptoms Using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Instrument

Levels of sleep symptoms will be measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index instrument. The PSQI contains 19 four-item Likert-style questions conducted over a 30-day period and 5 questions rated by the bed partner or roommate. Responses range from 0 = Not in the past month to 3 = Three or more times a week. The bed partner/roommate questions were not assessed. The 19 self-rated questions are grouped into seven component domains including subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medications, and daytime dysfunction. See Buysse (1989), for the scoring schema of the component domains. The PSQI score is the sum of the seven component scores and ranges from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality. (NCT02206035)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 28, Day 100 and Day 180

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 28Day 100Day 180
Historical Control Arm (Secondary Outcome Measures)6.97.86.77.2
Tacrolimus, Methotrexate and Tocilizumab (Tac/MTX/Toc)7.58.17.98.5

[back to top]

Score of Fatigue Symptoms Using the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) Instrument

"Levels of fatigue symptoms will be measured using the Fatigue Symptom Inventory instrument. The FSI comprises 13 eleven-item Likert-style questions ranging from 0 = Not at all fatigued to 10 -Extreme fatigue. The FSI score is the average of the individual question scores. The range of scores is 0 to 10 with higher scores indicate greater fatigue (Hann, 1998)." (NCT02206035)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 28, Day 100 and Day 180

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 28Day 100Day 180
Historical Control Arm (Secondary Outcome Measures)4.14.54.34.2
Tacrolimus, Methotrexate and Tocilizumab (Tac/MTX/Toc)2.44.23.74.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD Requiring Immunosupressive Therapy

Chronic GVHD is classified per 2005 NIH Consensus Criteria (Filipovich et al. 2005) into categories of severity: none, mild, moderate, and severe. Occurrence of chronic GVHD is defined as the occurrence of mild, moderate, or severe chronic GVHD per this classification. This endpoint considers the occurrence of chronic GVHD that necessitated initiation of immunosuppressive therapy for treatment. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib29
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc33
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide22

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Relapse or Progression

Relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of acute leukemia or MDS consistent with pretransplant features, or radiologic evidence of lymphoma. Progression of disease applies to patients with lymphoproliferative diseases (lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia) not in remission prior to transplantation and is defined as increase in size of prior sites of disease or evidence of new sites of disease. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib24
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc31
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide28

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery

Platelet recovery is defined as the first day of a sustained platelet count >20,000/mm^3 with no platelet transfusion in the preceding seven days. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: Days 60 and 100 Post-transplant

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 60Day 100
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib9191
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc9292
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide9096

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival

Disease-free survival is defined as being alive and free of disease relapse or progression. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib58
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc56
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide60

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery

Neutrophil recovery is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 500/mm^3 for three consecutive measurements on three different days. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: Days 28 and 100 Post-transplant

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 28Day 100
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib9496
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc9395
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide9598

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival

(NCT02208037)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib68
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc66
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide71

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With GVHD/Relapse or Progression-free Survival (GRFS)

GRFS is defined as being free of grade III-IV acute GVHD onset, chronic GVHD onset requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy, disease relapse or progression, and death from any cause. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib35.5
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc27.2
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide44.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With GVHD-free Survival

GVHD-free survival is defined as being alive without previous onset of Grade III-IV acute GVHD or chronic GVHD requiring immunosuppressive therapy. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib43
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc34
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide53

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade III-IV Acute GVHD

"Acute GVHD is graded according to the scoring system proposed by Przepiorka et al.1995:~Skin stage:~0: No rash~Rash <25% of body surface area~Rash on 25-50% of body surface area~Rash on > 50% of body surface area~Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation~Liver stage (based on bilirubin level)*:~0: <2 mg/dL 1.2-3 mg/dL 2.3.01-6 mg/dL 3.6.01-15.0 mg/dL 4.>15 mg/dL~GI stage*:~0: No diarrhea or diarrhea <500 mL/day~Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD~Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day~Diarrhea >1500 mL/day~Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus * If multiple etiologies are listed for liver or GI, the organ system is downstaged by 1.~GVHD grade:~0: All organ stages 0 or GVHD not listed as an etiology I: Skin stage 1-2 and liver and GI stage 0 II: Skin stage 3 or liver or GI stage 1 III: Liver stage 2-3 or GI stage 2-4 IV: Skin or liver stage 4" (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: Day 180 Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib8
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc9
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD

"Acute GVHD is graded according to the scoring system proposed by Przepiorka et al.1995:~Skin stage:~0: No rash~Rash <25% of body surface area~Rash on 25-50% of body surface area~Rash on > 50% of body surface area~Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation~Liver stage (based on bilirubin level)*:~0: <2 mg/dL~2-3 mg/dL~3.01-6 mg/dL~6.01-15.0 mg/dL~>15 mg/dL~GI stage*:~0: No diarrhea or diarrhea <500 mL/day~Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD~Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day~Diarrhea >1500 mL/day~Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus * If multiple etiologies are listed for liver or GI, the organ system is downstaged by 1.~GVHD grade:~0: All organ stages 0 or GVHD not listed as an etiology I: Skin stage 1-2 and liver and GI stage 0 II: Skin stage 3 or liver or GI stage 1 III: Liver stage 2-3 or GI stage 2-4 IV: Skin or liver stage 4" (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: Day 180 Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib26
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc32
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide27

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD

Chronic GVHD is classified per 2005 NIH Consensus Criteria (Filipovich et al. 2005) into categories of severity: none, mild, moderate, and severe. Occurrence of chronic GVHD is defined as the occurrence of mild, moderate, or severe chronic GVHD per this classification. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib39
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc43
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide28

[back to top]

Donor Cell Engraftment

Donor cell engraftment will be assessed with donor/recipient chimerism. Chimerism may be evaluated in bone marrow, whole blood, or CD3 fractions. Full donor chimerism is defined as the presence of ≥ 95% of donor cells as a proportion of total cells. Mixed chimerism is defined as the presence of donor cells, as a proportion of total cells, of < 95% but > 5% in the bone marrow or peripheral blood. Full and mixed chimerism will be evidence of donor cell engraftment. Donor cells of ≤ 5% will be considered as graft rejection. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: Days 28 and 100 Post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 2872130179Day 2872130181Day 2872130180Day 10072130180Day 10072130181Day 10072130179
Full ChimerismMixed ChimerismGraft RejectionDeadNo Assay Performed
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib58
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide64
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib11
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide8
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib1
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc1
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide2
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib2
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc4
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide0
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib17
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc21
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide18
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib63
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc56
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide62
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib14
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc17
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide13
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib5
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc3
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide3
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib4
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc10
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide5
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib3
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc6
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide9

[back to top]

Change in eGFR (MDRD) at 2 Years Post-transplant Compared to Baseline at Month 3 (Conversion)

To assess change in renal function by calculated (MDRD) GFR of adult EBV seropositive renal transplant recipients of living or standard criteria donors converted from Tacrolimus to Belatacept or low dose Tacrolimus with Belatacept at three months post-operatively compared to renal transplant recipients randomized to remain on standard dose Tacrolimus and MPA for maintenance therapy at 2 years post-transplantation (NCT02213068)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Belatacept + MPA-5.44
Belatacept + Low-Dose Tac8.08
Tacrolimus + MPA Standard Treatment Regimen-0.38

[back to top]

Graft Survival

Number of Subjects with a functioning Graft (NCT02213068)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Belatacept + MPA8
Belatacept + Low-Dose Tac8
Tacrolimus + MPA Standard Treatment Regimen10

[back to top]

Patient Survival

Number of Subjects alive at the end of 24 months (NCT02213068)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Belatacept + MPA9
Belatacept + Low-Dose Tac7
Tacrolimus + MPA Standard Treatment Regimen9

[back to top]

Acute Rejection

Number of Participants with Acute Rejection (AR). AR is defined as allograft dysfunctions in the setting of recipient immune system engaging an allo-response against the kidney transplant. (NCT02213068)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Belatacept + MPA4
Belatacept + Low-Dose Tac0
Tacrolimus + MPA Standard Treatment Regimen2

[back to top]

CFZ533 Plasma PK Concentrations - Part II

Quantify the systemic concentrations of CFZ533 in combination with MMF, CS, and tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant patients during the treatment and follow-up periods. A full pharmacokinetic analysis can be performed on the concentration-time data to evaluate the impact of renal transplantation on the various medications used in the treatment regimen. (NCT02217410)
Timeframe: throughout study period (day 84 to day 336)

Interventionug/mL (Mean)
Day 84Day 112Day 140Day 168Day 196Day 224Day 252Day 280Day 308Day 336End of study
CFZ533 + MMF (Part 2)247211178157148147151160132156133

[back to top]

Anti-CFZ533 Antibodies - Part II

To evaluate the immunogenicity of CFZ533 via the quantitative analysis of anti-CFZ533 antibodies (NCT02217410)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (screening, baseline, Day 141, Day 225, Day 309, Study Completion)

Interventionanti-CFZ533 antibodies (Number)
ScreeningBaselineDay 141Day 225Day 309Study Completion
CFZ533 + MMF (Part 2)000000

[back to top]

Anti-CFZ533 Antibodies - Part II

To evaluate the immunogenicity of CFZ533 via the quantitative analysis of anti-CFZ533 antibodies (NCT02217410)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (screening, baseline, Day 141, Day 225, Day 309, Study Completion)

Interventionanti-CFZ533 antibodies (Number)
ScreeningDay 141Day 225Day 309Study Completion
Tac + MMF (Part 2)00000

[back to top]

Mean Tmax Pharmacokinetic Parameter - Part I

Quantify pharmacokinetics of CFZ533 in combination with MMF, CS, and tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant patients during the treatment and follow-up periods. (NCT02217410)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionday (Median)
CFZ533 + TAC + MMF (Part 1)0.237

[back to top]

Mean Cmax Pharmacokinetic Parameter- Part I

Pharmacokinetics as defined by the systemic concentrations and Cmax of certain immunosuppressant medications used in Part I (NCT02217410)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionug/mL (Mean)
CFZ533 + TAC + MMF (Part 1)66.3

[back to top]

Mean AUClast Pharmacokinetic Parameter - Part I

Quantify pharmacokinetics of CFZ533 in combination with MMF, CS, and tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant patients during the treatment and follow-up periods. (NCT02217410)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionday*ug/mL (Mean)
CFZ533 + TAC + MMF (Part 1)367

[back to top]

Anti-CFZ533 Antibodies - Part I

To evaluate the immunogenicity of CFZ533 via the quantitative analysis of anti-CFZ533 antibodies (NCT02217410)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study

Interventionanti-CFZ533 antibodies (Number)
CFZ533 + TAC + MMF (Part 1)0

[back to top]

Total Soluble CD40 and Total Soluble CD154 Concentrations in Plasma - Part 1

To quantify the change from baseline and recovery of peripheral blood total soluble CD40 and total soluble CD154 (NCT02217410)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (Day 1, Day 29, Day 337)

,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
BaselineDay 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 8Day 15Day 22Day 29Day 36Day 43Day 50Day 57Day 64Day 71Day 85Day 99Day 113Day 127EoS
sCD1540.1250.05850.1390.1570.2410.3990.08790.05000.2250.1160.01930.047800.03160.01480.013900.06680.04880.0184
sCD40 (Part I)4.038.8616.724.831.354.084.110212012814515616116315616815585.712.20.918

[back to top]

Total sCD40 Plasma Concentrations - Part II

To quantify the change from baseline and recovery of peripheral blood total soluble CD40 (NCT02217410)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
BaselineDay 1Day 4Day 15Day 29Day 57Day 85Day 113Day 141Day 169Day 197Day 225Day 253Day 281Day 309Day 337End of Study
CFZ533 + MMF (Part 2)3.026.9524.669.6101140189215237238253258236273286298303
Tac + MMF (Part 2)3.671.161.160.8690.3620.4380.4290.3910.4530.5370.4230.4520.4570.4550.4540.4110.959

[back to top]

Free CD40 and Total CD40 on B Cells - Part II

The magnitude and duration of peripheral blood CD40 occupancy. MESF: molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (NCT02217410)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (Day 1/predose)

,
InterventionMESF (Mean)
CFZ553 + MMF (Baseline)CFZ553 + MMF (D1 - 6h post dose)CFZ553 + MMF (D15)CFZ553 + MMF (D 29)CFZ553 + MMF (D 57)CFZ553 + MMF (D 85)CFZ553 + MMF (D 197)CFZ553 + MMF (253)CFZ553 + MMF (EoS)Tac + MMF (Baseline)Tac + MMF (D1 - 6h post dose)Tac + MMF (D15)Tac + MMF (D29)Tac + MMF (D57)Tac + MMF (D85)Tac + MMF (D197)Tac + MMF (D253)Tac + MMF (EoS)
Free CD40 on Whole Blood B Ceels30836.001623.81799.62817.63597.13635.473699.02667.38176.1731508.3326437.6524441.6727840.0027994.2925044.0021360.0015752.7521200.00
Total CD40 on Whole Blood B Cells12778.8013806.9015160.3813299.6012234.389330.862820.721427.141069.6714581.4313715.0013707.1412698.7512583.858701.542067.601750.506276.17

[back to top]

eGFR - Part II

"Renal function as assessed by MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) formula.~eGFR: Estimated glomerular filtration rate" (NCT02217410)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 29, Day 337,

,
Interventionml/min (Mean)
Day 1Day 29Day 337
CFZ533 + MMF (Part 2)9.855.658.2
Tac + MMF (Part 2)9.744.344.2

[back to top]

Efficacy as Defined by the Frequency and Severity (Banff Classification) of Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR) Adjudicated Data - Part II

"To assess the activity of the investigational arm as compared to the standard of care control arm in de novo renal transplant patients as measured by the frequency and severity of tBPAR as measured on the Banff classification scale.~An adjudication was performed on all on cause renal biopsies by an independent expert committee blinded to therapy." (NCT02217410)
Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

,
Interventionevents (Number)
Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12
CFZ533 + MMF (Part 2)6777
Tac + MMF (Part 2)2333

[back to top] [back to top]

Length of Time Required for Patients to Recover ANC and Platelet Counts After Transplant

CBC drawn daily with a WBC differential once the total WBC is greater than 100 until ANC > 500 for three days or two consecutive measurements over a three day period; then CBC drawn weekly with differential. (NCT02224872)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventiondays (Median)
Bone Marrow Transplant18.85

[back to top]

Participants That Were GVHD Free, Relapse Free Survival (GRFS)

(NCT02224872)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant14

[back to top]

Is This Type of Transplantation for Severe Aplastic Anemia Feasible and Safe?

Feasibility will be met with the following conditions: the patient has the transplant, is assessed for the safety endpoint, and survives one year. The safety monitoring plan is included to monitor graft failure (day 60), grade 2-4 acute graft versus host disease (day100), 6 month mortality (day 180), and chronic graft versus host disease (day 180). (NCT02224872)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant18

[back to top]

Number of Patients That Have Survived at One Year

(NCT02224872)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant18

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade II-IV or Grade III-IV Acute GVHD

Participants were graded during clinical visits based on evidence and extent of skin rash, liver involvement, and GI tract involvement (NCT02224872)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant17

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Primary or Secondary Graft Failure Following Transplant

"Graft failure: < 5% donor chimerism in blood and/or bone marrow on ~Day 30 or after and on all subsequent measurements.~Primary graft failure: < 5% donor chimerism in blood and/or bone marrow by ~ Day 56 Secondary graft failure: achievement of > 5% donor chimerism, followed by sustained <5% donor chimerism in blood and/or bone marrow." (NCT02224872)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant17

[back to top]

Number of Patients That Have Acheived Full Donor Chimerism by Day 60 After Transplant

Donor chimerism will be measured in the peripheral blood around day 30 and day 60. Patients with >5% donor chimerism around day 60 will be considered as having engrafted. (NCT02224872)
Timeframe: 60 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant7

[back to top]

Participants With Chronic GVHD at One Year

(NCT02224872)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant3

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Rate of Acute GvHD

Kaplan-Meier estimation of the rate of acute GvHD in the study population at one year with a 95% confidence interval. (NCT02248597)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Stem Cell Transplant With GVHD Prophylaxis)51.8

[back to top]

Relapse-free Mortality

Non-relapse mortality will be defined as time from registration to death due to anything other than relapse of hematological malignancy. Patients who relapse will be treated as a competing risk. (NCT02248597)
Timeframe: At 12 months

Interventiondays (Mean)
Treatment (Stem Cell Transplant With GVHD Prophylaxis)86.8

[back to top]

12 Month Disease Free Survival Probability

The percentage of patients who experience death or disease relapse by one year will be calculated and a corresponding 95% confidence interval will be constructed using the normal approximation for binomial proportions. The survival function will be estimated and plotted using the method of Kaplan and Meier. (NCT02248597)
Timeframe: At 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Stem Cell Transplant With GVHD Prophylaxis)51.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival

The survival function will be estimated and plotted using the method of Kaplan and Meier. (NCT02248597)
Timeframe: At 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Stem Cell Transplant With GVHD Prophylaxis)66.7

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Kaplan-Meier estimation of the percentage of patients who are alive without progressive disease at one year. (NCT02248597)
Timeframe: At 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Stem Cell Transplant With GVHD Prophylaxis)51.8

[back to top]

Non-Relapse Mortality

The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality is estimated by proportional hazard models methods. (NCT02328755)
Timeframe: 1 year or until study stops, whichever is later. Median time of follow-up was 25 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6 months2 years
189mcg Peg-IFN-α, HLA-matched1325

[back to top]

Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Peg-IFN-α

The dose level assigned to the most participants is selected as the MTD. Participants from the arms for dose level 1 (90mcg, 3 participants) and dose level 2 (180mcg, 33 participants) were analyzed together to determine the MTD. Dosage levels are determined by dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Only DLTs encountered during the treatment period, prior to day 56 post HCT (or 14 days after final treatment, whichever comes later), are counted. DLTs after the treatment period are counted only if they reflect an ongoing toxicity that initiated in the treatment period. (NCT02328755)
Timeframe: Up to day 56 post-transplant or up to 14 days after final treatment with peg-IFN-α, whichever comes later. Data was collected up to 63 days.

Interventionmcg (Number)
Peg-IFN-α180

[back to top]

Phase 2: Number of Patients That Relapse

The cumulative incidence of relapse, estimated using proportional hazard model for the competing risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM). (NCT02328755)
Timeframe: 6 Months Post HCT

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II MTD (180mcg) participants with fully matched donor HCTAll participants
Dose Level 2 - 180 mg Peg-IFN-α3939

[back to top]

Phase 2: Number of Patients That Relapse

The cumulative incidence of relapse, estimated using proportional hazard model for the competing risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM). (NCT02328755)
Timeframe: 6 Months Post HCT

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
All participants
Dose Level 1 - 90 mg Peg-IFN-α67

[back to top]

Phase 2: Overall Survival Time

Estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the day of transplantation (day 0) until death; shown at 6 month and 2 year estimates (NCT02328755)
Timeframe: 1 year or until study stops, whichever is later. Median time of follow-up was 25 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6 months (Phase II MTD [180 mcg] participants with fully matched donor HCT)6 months - all participants2 years (Phase II MTD [180 mcg] participants with fully matched donor HCT)
Dose Level 2 - 180 mcg Peg-IFN-α555533

[back to top]

Acute GVHD

Grade 2-4 Acute GVHD estimated using proportional hazards ratio. Graded according to CTCAE v. 4.0; higher grades represent more severe events. (NCT02328755)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
180mcg Peg-IFN-α, HLA-matched39

[back to top]

Phase 2: Overall Survival Time

Estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the day of transplantation (day 0) until death; shown at 6 month and 2 year estimates (NCT02328755)
Timeframe: 1 year or until study stops, whichever is later. Median time of follow-up was 25 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6 months - all participants
Dose Level 1 - 90 mcg Peg-IFN-α33

[back to top]

Phase 2: Event Free Survival Time

Defined for this study as Leukemia Free Survival, and estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. (NCT02328755)
Timeframe: 1 year or until study stops, whichever is later. Median time of follow-up was 25 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6 months2 years
Peg-IFN-α4828

[back to top]

Evaluation of T(Max) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.

"Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling times was used to calculate T(max).~Nominal time points used were:~Prograf sampling strategy (21 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 14.5, 15, 16, 18, 20, and 24.~Envarsus XR sampling strategy (18 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, and 27.~Astagraf XL sampling strategy (17 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 24." (NCT02339246)
Timeframe: 8 days

Interventionhour (Median)
Envarsus XR5.91
Astagraf XL1.93
Prograf1.48

[back to top]

Evaluation of C(Max) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.

"Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling times was used to calculate C(max).~Nominal time points used were:~Prograf sampling strategy (21 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 14.5, 15, 16, 18, 20, and 24.~Envarsus XR sampling strategy (18 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, and 27.~Astagraf XL sampling strategy (17 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 24." (NCT02339246)
Timeframe: 8 days

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Envarsus XR13.88
Astagraf XL13.17
Prograf14.54

[back to top]

Evaluation of AUC(0-24) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.

"Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling times was used to calculate AUC(0-24).~Nominal time points used were:~Prograf sampling strategy (21 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 14.5, 15, 16, 18, 20, and 24.~Envarsus XR sampling strategy (18 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, and 27.~Astagraf XL sampling strategy (17 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 24." (NCT02339246)
Timeframe: 8 days

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Envarsus XR213.41
Astagraf XL165.02
Prograf176.52

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD

The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD will be determined. Death prior to acute GVHD is treated as the competing risk. Data will be collected directly from providers and chart review according to the recommendations of the NIH Consensus Criteria. Eight organs will be scored on a 0-3 scale to reflect degree of chronic GVHD involvement. Liver and pulmonary function test results and use of systemic therapy for treatment of chronic GVHD will also be recorded. This secondary endpoint of chronic GVHD will include mild, moderate and severe chronic GVHD based on NIH Consensus Criteria. (NCT02345850)
Timeframe: 2 Years

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1 year post-transplantation2 years post-transplantation
CD34 Selected Graft16.418.5
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide33.037.0
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Control31.140.0

[back to top]

Participants With Primary Graft Failure

Primary graft failure is defined as no neutrophil recovery to > 500 cells/µL by Day 28 post HSCT. (NCT02345850)
Timeframe: Day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CD34 Selected Graft3
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide9
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Control4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD-free Survival

The event for this endpoint includes moderate to severe chronic GVHD according to NIH consensus criteria global score, or death by any cause. (NCT02345850)
Timeframe: 2 Years

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1 year post-transplantation2 years post-transplantation
CD34 Selected Graft71.055.4
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide67.454.2
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Control65.847.1

[back to top]

Participants With Immunosuppression-free Survival

Patients who are alive, relapse-free, and do not need ongoing immune suppression to control GVHD at one year post HSCT are considered successes for this endpoint. Immune suppression is defined as any systemic agents used to control or suppress GVHD. (NCT02345850)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CD34 Selected Graft59
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide73
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Control66

[back to top]

Participants With Grade ≥ 3 Toxicity

All grades ≥ 3 toxicities according to CTCAE, version 4 will be tabulated for each intervention arm. The number of unique patients is counted. (NCT02345850)
Timeframe: 2 Years

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any Grade 3-5 Stem Cell Infusional ToxicitiesGrades 3-5 Oral mucositisGrades 3-5 Cystitis noninfectiveGrades 3-5 Acute kidney injuryGrades 3-5 Chronic kidney diseaseGrades 3-5 HemorrhageGrades 3-5 HypotensionGrades 3-5 HypertensionGrades 3-5 Cardiac arrhythmiaGrades 3-5 Left ventricular systolic dysfunctionGrades 3-5 SomnolenceGrades 3-5 SeizureGrades 3-5 Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraGrades 3-5 Capillary leak syndromeGrades 3-5 HypoxiaGrades 3-5 DsypneaGrades 3-4 ALTGrades 3-4 ASTGrades 3-4 BilirubinGrades 3-4 Alkaline PhosphataseReceived dialysisAbnormal liver functionSOS/VODIPSToxicities Within Day 100Toxicities Day 100 to 1 yearToxicities 1 year to 2 yearsOverall NCI CTCAE Grade 3-5 Toxicities
CD34 Selected Graft6394124121920957611322310118115120268262380
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide45111134915216240202215262714122142282331888
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Control1763215341130884241141218197662413814124100

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Relapse-free Survival

The events for this endpoint RFS are death and relapse of the underlying malignancy. The analyses of this endpoint use the transplanted populations and time is from transplant to the event of disease relapse or death, or last follow up, whichever comes first. (NCT02345850)
Timeframe: 2 Years

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1 year post-transplantation2 years post-transplantation
CD34 Selected Graft64.157.1
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide78.870.3
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Control70.166.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)

OS is a key secondary endpoint, with explicit control of the type I error rate through a gatekeeper approach. Formal significance testing of OS between a CNI-free strategy and the control will be conducted if the corresponding CRFS comparison is significant. This OS comparison will be done using a Bonferroni adjusted significance level of 0.05/3 to account for three potential CNI-free comparisons to the control. Otherwise, survival analyses will be considered exploratory. Death from any cause is considered as event for this endpoint. Participant is censored if lost to follow up. (NCT02345850)
Timeframe: 2 Years

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1 year post-randomization2 year post-randomization1 year post-transplantation2 year post-transplantation
CD34 Selected Graft75.760.174.861.6
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide84.676.283.476.7
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Control84.276.183.374.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil Engraftment

Neutrophil recovery is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 500/mm^3 for three consecutive measurements on three different days. The first of the three days will be designated the day of neutrophil recovery. The competing event is death without neutrophil recovery. (NCT02345850)
Timeframe: Day 28

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CD34 Selected Graft97.1
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide91.7
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Control96.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Relapse

Relapse is defined by either morphological evidence of acute leukemia or MDS consistent with pre-transplant features, or radiologic evidence of lymphoma, documented or not by biopsy. The event is defined as increase in size of prior sites of disease or evidence of new sites of disease, documented or not by biopsy. Relapse is adjudicated by ERC. Disease relapse is analyzed using cumulative incidence function with death as a competing risk. The analyses of this endpoint use the transplanted populations, and the time will be measured from transplant to the earliest of death, relapse/progression, or last follow up. (NCT02345850)
Timeframe: 2 Years

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1 year post transplantation2 years post transplantation
CD34 Selected Graft19.421.4
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide9.213.9
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Control22.925.6

[back to top]

Incidence of Infections

All grade 2 and grade 3 infections, as defined by the BMT CTN Technical MOP, occurring post transplantation will be reported. The incidence of definite and probable viral, fungal and bacterial infections will be tabulated for each intervention arm. (NCT02345850)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionnumber of Infection Events (Number)
CD34 Selected Graft157
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide161
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Control123

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Secondary Graft Failure

Secondary graft failure will be assessed according to neutrophil count after initial hematologic recovery. Secondary graft failure is defined as initial neutrophil engraftment followed by subsequent decline in absolute neutrophil counts < 500 cells/µL, unresponsive to growth factor therapy, but cannot be explained by disease relapse or medications. Secondary graft failure will be analyzed using cumulative incidence function with death as a competing risk. (NCT02345850)
Timeframe: 2 Years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CD34 Selected Graft2.9
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide0
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Control0.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery

Platelet recovery is defined as the first day of a sustained platelet count >20,000/mm^3 with no platelet transfusion in the preceding seven days. The first day of sustained platelet count above this threshold will be designated the day of platelet engraftment. The competing event is death without platelet recovery. (NCT02345850)
Timeframe: Day 60

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CD34 Selected Graft94.2
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide91.6
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Control98.2

[back to top]

Chronic GVHD-free, Relapse-free Survival (CRFS) Probability

The primary endpoint of the trial is Chronic GVHD/Relapse-Free Survival (CRFS), treated as a time to event variable. An event for this time to event outcome is defined as moderate to severe chronic GVHD, disease relapse, or death by any cause. Participant will be censored if lost to follow up prior to 2 years. Time is from randomization to the event of moderate to severe chronic GVHD, disease relapse, death, last follow up, or 2 years, whichever comes first. The primary analysis is performed using the intent-to-treat principle (ITT) so that all randomized patients are included in the analysis. (NCT02345850)
Timeframe: 2 years

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1 year Post Randomization2 years Post Randomization
CD34 Selected Graft60.250.6
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide60.348.1
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Control52.641.0

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Participants Infected Post Transplant

All grade 2 and grade 3 infections, as defined by the BMT CTN Technical MOP, occurring post transplantation will be reported. The incidence of definite and probable viral, fungal and bacterial infections will be tabulated for each intervention arm. (NCT02345850)
Timeframe: 2 Years

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Patients with Grades 2-3 infectionsPatients with Grades 3 infections
CD34 Selected Graft7231
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide6623
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Control5016

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Acute GVHD

Cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD were determined. Death prior to acute GVHD is treated as the competing risk. Grading of acute GVHD was derived by consensus grading (Przepiorka 1995) per BMTCTN manual of procedures (MOP). The acute GVHD algorithm calculates the grade based on the organ (skin, GI and liver) stage and etiology/biopsy reported on the weekly GVHD form. Staging for skin: Stage 1. <25% rash; 2. 25-50%; 3. >50%; 4. generalized erythroderma with bullae. Staging for GI: Stage 1. Diarrhea>500ml/d or persistent nausea; 2. >1000ml/d; 3. >1500ml/d; 4. Large volume diarrhea and severe abdominal pain +- ileus. Staging for Liver: Stage 1. bilirubin 2-3mg/dl; 2. bilirubin 3-6 mg/dl; 3. bilirubin 6-15 mg/dl; 4. bilirubin>15mg/dl. Grade 4 is the worst outcome. (NCT02345850)
Timeframe: Day 100

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
grade II-IV acute GVHDgrade III-IV acute GVHD
CD34 Selected Graft16.32.9
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide37.610.1
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Control29.83.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Metabolic Parameters

"Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:~Glucose: <=3.9 mmol/L and =11.1 mmol/L (unfasted [unfas]) or >=7 mmol/L (fasted [fas])~Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): >8%~Total cholesterol: >=6.2 mmol/L; >=7.74 mmol/L~LDL cholesterol: >=4.1 mmol/L; >=4.9 mmol/L~Triglycerides: >=4.6 mmol/L; >=5.6 mmol/L" (NCT02373202)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 58

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Glucose <=3.9 mmol/L and Glucose >=11.1 mmol/L (unfas) or >=7 mmol/L (fas)HbA1c >8%Total Cholesterol >=6.2 mmol/LTotal Cholesterol >=7.74 mmol/LLDL Cholesterol >=4.1 mmol/LLDL Cholesterol >=4.9 mmol/LTriglycerides >=4.6 mmol/LTriglycerides >=5.6 mmol/L
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w1001216200
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w + DMARDs000611000
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w1211323111
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w + DMARDs010713100

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received IMP and did not necessary have to had a causal relationship with treatment. All AEs that occurred from the first dose of the IMP administration up to 6 weeks after last dose of treatment (up to Week 58) were considered as TEAEs. SAEs were AEs resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly or a medically important event. TEAEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs. (NCT02373202)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 58

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAESAE
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w251
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w + DMARDs140
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w282
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w + DMARDs133

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters

"Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:~Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): >1 ULN and <=1.5 ULN; >1.5 ULN and <=3 ULN; >3 ULN and <=5 ULN; >5 ULN and <=10 ULN; >10 ULN and <=20 ULN; >20 ULN~Aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >1 ULN and <=1.5 ULN; >1.5 ULN and <=3 ULN; >3 ULN and <=5 ULN; >5 ULN and <=10 ULN; >10 ULN and <=20 ULN; >20 ULN~Alkaline phosphatase: >1.5 ULN~Total bilirubin (TBILI): >1.5 ULN; >2 ULN~Conjugated bilirubin(CBILI): >1.5 ULN~Unconjugated bilirubin: >1.5 ULN~ALT >3 ULN and TBILI >2 ULN~CBILI >35% TBILI and TBILI >1.5 ULN~Albumin: <=25 g/L" (NCT02373202)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 58

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ALT >1 ULN and <=1.5 ULNALT >1.5 ULN and <=3 ULNALT >3 ULN and <=5 ULNALT >5 ULN and <=10 ULNALT >10 ULN and <=20 ULNALT >20 ULNAST >1 ULN and <=1.5 ULNAST >1.5 ULN and <=3 ULNAST >3 ULN and <=5 ULNAST >5 ULN and <=10 ULNAST >10 ULN and <=20 ULNAST >20 ULNAlkaline Phosphatase >1.5 ULNTBILI >1.5 ULNTBILI >2 ULNCBILI >1.5 ULNUnconjugated Bilirubin >1.5 ULNALT> 3 ULN and TBILI >2ULNCBILI >35% TBILI and TBILI >1.5 ULNAlbumin <=25 g/L
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w73100082000000000000
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w + DMARDs32110061100001000000
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w62400043100000000000
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w + DMARDs41000050000001000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

"Criteria for potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities:~PR Interval: >200 milliseconds (ms); >200 ms and IFB >=25%; >220 ms; >220 ms and IFB >=25%; >240 ms; >240 ms and IFB >=25%~QRS Interval: >110 ms; >110 ms and IFB >=25%; >120 ms; >120 ms and IFB >=25%~QT Interval: >500 ms~QTc Bazett (QTc B): >450 ms; >480 ms; >500 ms; IFB >30 and <=60 ms, IFB >60 ms~QTc Fridericia (QTc F): >450 ms; >480 ms; >500 ms; IFB >30 and <=60 ms; IFB >60 ms" (NCT02373202)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 58

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
PR >200 msPR >200 ms and IFB >=25%PR >220 msPR >220 ms and IFB >=25%PR >240 msPR >240 ms and IFB >=25%QRS >110 msQRS >110 ms and IFB >=25%QRS >120 msQRS >120 ms and IFB >=25%QT >500 msQTc B >450 msQTc B >480 msQTc B >500 msQTc B IFB >30 and <=60 msQTc B IFB >60 msQTc F >450 msQTc F >480 msQTc F >500 msQTc F IFB >30 and <=60 msQTc F IFB >60 ms
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w000000000006002020000
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w + DMARDs000000000002000020000
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w1010001000110101061000
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w + DMARDs000000202001101010000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes

"Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:~Sodium: <=129 mmol/L; >=160 mmol/L~Potassium: <3 mmol/L; >=5.5 mmol/L~Chloride: <80 mmol/L; >115 mmol/L" (NCT02373202)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 58

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sodium <=129 mmol/LSodium >=160 mmol/LPotassium <3 mmol/LPotassium >=5.5 mmol/LChloride <80 mmol/LChloride >115 mmol/L
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w000000
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w + DMARDs000000
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w000000
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w + DMARDs000000

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints Based on C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)

DAS28-CRP is a composite score that contains 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints), SJC (based on 28 joints), participant's assessment of general health on VAS (range 0 [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad]) and CRP (mg/L). DAS28-CRP total score ranges from 2-10 with a lower score indicating less disease activity. A DAS28-CRP above 5.1 indicates high disease activity, whereas below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and below 2.6 as disease remission. (NCT02373202)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w + DMARDs-2.90
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w + DMARDs-2.47
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w-2.62
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w-2.64

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters

"Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:~Hemoglobin: <=115 g/L (Male[M]) or <=95 g/L (Female[F]); >=185 g/L (M) or >=165 g/L (F); DFB >=20 g/L~Hematocrit: <=0.37 v/v (M) or <=0.32 v/v (F); >=0.55 v/v (M) or >=0.5 v/v (F)~Red blood cells (RBC): >=6 Tera/L~Platelets: <50 Giga/L; >=50 and <100 Giga/L; >=700 Giga/L~White blood cells (WBC): <3.0 Giga/L (Non-Black [NB]) or <2.0 Giga/L (Black [B]); >=16.0 Giga/L~Neutrophils: <1.5 Giga/L (NB) or <1.0 Giga/L (B); <1.0 Giga/L~Lymphocytes: <0.5 Giga/L; >=0.5 Giga/L and 4.0 Giga/L~Monocytes: >0.7 Giga/L~Basophils: >0.1 Giga/L~Eosinophils: >0.5 Giga/L or >upper limit of normal (ULN) (if ULN >=0.5 Giga/L)" (NCT02373202)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 58

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hemoglobin <=115 g/L (M) or <=95 g/L (F)Hemoglobin >=185 g/L (M) or >=165 g/L (F)Hemoglobin DFB >=20 g/LHematocrit <=0.37 v/v (M) or <=0.32 v/v (F)Hematocrit >0.55 v/v (M) or >=0.5 v/v (F)RBC >=6 Tera/LPlatelets <50 Giga/LPlatelets >=50 and <100 Giga/LPlatelets >=700 Giga/LWBC <3.0 Giga/L (NB) or <2.0 Giga/L (B)WBC >=16.0 Giga/LNeutrophils <1.5 Giga/L (NB) or <1.0 Giga/L (B)Neutrophils <1.0 Giga/LLymphocytes <0.5 Giga/LLymphocytes >=0.5 Giga/L and Lymphocytes >4.0 Giga/LMonocytes >0.7 Giga/LBasophils >0.1 Giga/LEosinophils >0.5 Giga/L or >ULN (ULN >=0.5 Giga/L)
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w1002000107082030302
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w + DMARDs0000000106085030110
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w30260000090134180252
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w + DMARDs10030001090113041000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function Parameters

"Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:~Creatinine: >=150 micromol/L (adults); >=30% change from baseline, >=100% change from baseline~Creatinine clearance: <15 mL/min; >=15 to <30 mL/min; >=30 to <60 mL/min; >=60 to <90 mL/min~Blood urea nitrogen: >=17 mmol/L~Uric acid: <120 micromol/L; >408 micromol/L" (NCT02373202)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 58

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Creatinine >=150 micromol/L (Adults)Creatinine >=30% change from baselineCreatinine >=100% change from baselineCreatinine Clearance <15 mL/minCreatinine clearance >=15 to <30 mL/minCreatinine clearance >=30 to <60 mL/minCreatinine clearance >=60 to <90 mL/minBlood Urea Nitrogen >=17 mmol/LUric acid <120 micromol/LUric acid >408 micromol/L
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w06000615002
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w + DMARDs0300068001
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w15000517004
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w + DMARDs0300067011

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, 50 and 70 Responses at Week 52

ACR response is a composite rating scale that includes 7 variables: tender joints count (TJC [68 joints]); swollen joints count (SJC [66 joints]); levels of an acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive protein [hs-CRP level]); participant's assessment of pain (measured on 0 [no pain]-100 mm [worst pain] visual analog scale [VAS]); participant's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 [no arthritis activity]-100 mm [maximal arthritis activity] VAS); physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 [no arthritis activity]-100 mm [maximal arthritis activity] VAS); participant's assessment of physical function (measured by Health Assessment Question-Disability Index [HAQ-DI], with scoring range of 0 [better health] - 3 [worst health]). ACR20/50/70 response is defined as at least 20/50/70% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 20/50/70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments, respectively. (NCT02373202)
Timeframe: Week 52

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ACR20ACR50ACR70
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w76.756.726.7
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w + DMARDs73.360.053.3
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w74.254.825.8
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w + DMARDs40.033.326.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities

"Criteria for potentially clinically significant vital sign abnormalities:~Systolic blood pressure (SBP) supine: <=95 mmHg and decrease from baseline (DFB) >=20 mmHg; >=160 mmHg and increase from baseline (IFB) >=20 mmHg~Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) supine: <=45 mmHg and DFB >=10 mmHg; >=110 mmHg and IFB ≥10 mmHg~SBP (Orthostatic): <=-20 mmHg~DBP (Orthostatic): <=-10 mmHg~Heart rate (HR) supine: <=50 beats per minute (bpm) and DFB >=20 bpm; >=120 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm~Weight: >=5% DFB; >=5% IFB" (NCT02373202)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 58

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SBP (supine) <=95 mmHg and DFB >=20 mmHgSBP (supine) >=160 mmHg and IFB >=20 mmHgDBP (supine) <=45 mmHg and DFB >=10 mmHgDBP (supine) >=110 mmHg and IFB >=10 mmHgSBP (orthostatic) <=-20 mmHgDBP (orthostatic) <=-10 mmHgHR (supine) <=50 bpm and DFB >= 20 bpmHR (supine) >=120 bpm and IFB >=20 bpmWeight >=5% DFBWeight >=5% IFB
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w01005510212
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w + DMARDs0100830013
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w01009101007
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w + DMARDs0100530012

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 52

HAQ-DI assessed the degree of difficulty participants experienced in 8 daily living activity domains during a week: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consisted of 2-3 items. Each items's difficulty was scored from 0-3 (0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, 3=unable to do). Overall HAQ-DI score was computed as the sum of domain scores divided by the number of domains answered, providing a score from 0-3. Low scores denoted improvement of disability/lower degree of domain difficulty. (NCT02373202)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w + DMARDs-0.52
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w + DMARDs-0.34
Sarilumab 150 mg q2w-0.48
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w-0.38

[back to top]

Event Free Survival; Number of Participants Who Survived at 2 Years

29 participants will be evaluated for Event Free Survival. (NCT02435901)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Expired Secondary to SepsisExpired Secondary to GVHDSurvived Participants
Reduced Intensity Regimen1226

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Sustained Cell Engraftment of Donor Cells

Sustained stem cell engraftment of donor cells will be evaluated by chimerism (FISH fluorescence in situ hybridization OR VNTR (Variable Number of Tandem Repeats), based on recipient/donor gender, at 30 days, 100 days, 6 months and 1 year following the use of reduced intensity conditioning. (NCT02435901)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Reduced Intensity Regimen29

[back to top]

Difference in Time to Therapeutic Level

Difference in the time to a therapeutic tacrolimus trough level in the aBW group compared to the IBW group. (NCT02444143)
Timeframe: Days 1 to 7

Interventiondays (Mean)
Ideal Body Weight4.9
Adjusted Body Weight5.1

[back to top]

Difference in Tacrolimus Exposure (AUC-0-24)) in Obese Patients Who Received an Initial TAC -ER Dose of 0.15 mg/kg Using aBW Versus IBW

Difference in tacrolimus exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC-0-24)) in obese patients who received an initial TAC -ER dose of 0.15 mg/kg using aBW versus IBW (NCT02444143)
Timeframe: Days 1-14

,
Interventionng•h/mL (Mean)
day 1 AUC 0-24day 7 AUC 0-24day 14 AUC 0-24
Adjusted Body Weight-Tacrolimus Extended Release90.0269.3267.3
Ideal Body Weight- Tacrolimus Extended Release115.2268.3355.0

[back to top]

Duration of Delayed Graft Function (DGF), Defined as Time From Transplantation to the Last Required Dialysis Treatment.

Participants are considered to have had DGF if they had at least one dialysis treatment in the first week post-transplant. For this endpoint, duration was calculated as the date of last post-transplant dialysis treatment minus the date of the first post-transplant dialysis treatment. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: First post-transplant dialysis treatment to last post-transplant dialysis treatment

InterventionDays (Mean)
Experimental13.27
Control15.74

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between Post-transplant Nadir and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. Post-transplant nadir was defined as the lowest value of eGFR from the first 6 months post-transplant. The change in eGFR between nadir and month 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the nadir eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental8.1
Control11.6

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between Post-transplant Nadir and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. Post-transplant nadir was defined as the lowest value of eGFR from the first 6 months post-transplant. The change in eGFR between nadir and month 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the nadir eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental8.5
Control12.0

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between 6 Months and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 6 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 6 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental1.0
Control5.2

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With BK Viremia That Require a Change in Immunosuppression or Anti-viral Treatment as Per Standard of Care at the Site.

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of BK viremia that required a change in their existing immunosuppression or the use of anti-viral therapy. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Experimental28.9
Control13.4

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR).

Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Criteria include: IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental5.1
Control4.2

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR) or Borderline Rejection.

Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of borderline or greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as Borderline, IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with borderline representing possible cellular rejection, IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection, and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection.Criteria include: Borderline-no intimal arteritis is present but foci of mild tubulitis; IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental8.5
Control6.1

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR) or Borderline Rejection

Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of borderline or greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as Borderline, IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with borderline representing possible cellular rejection, IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection, and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Criteria include: Borderline-no intimal arteritis is present but foci of mild tubulitis; IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental12.8
Control7

[back to top]

eGFR Values as Measured by MDRD

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Days 30, 60, and 180 post-transplantation

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Day 30Day 90Day 180
Control48.2048.9950.16
Experimental46.6447.1447.89

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Locally Treated Rejection, Defined as Treatment Administered for Rejection Based on Clinical Signs or Biopsy Findings.

Biopsies were read by the local pathologist at the hospital where the participant was a patient. These local reads informed clinical care for the participant, which may or may not include prescribing/administering medication to the participant to help with clinical concerns or findings noted on a biopsy. Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they have a report of receiving treatment for clinical or biopsy-proven rejection during the first 6 months post-transplant. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental12.6
Control20.5

[back to top]

eGFR Values as Measured by CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Days 30, 90, and 180 post-transplantation

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Day 30Day 90Day 180
Control50.6351.4452.65
Experimental49.2949.8050.56

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Immediately After Surgery) in Serum Creatinine.

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. eGFR values from 24, 48, and 72 hours post-transplant (i.e., days 1, 2, and 3) were used to generate an estimate of the serum creatinine at each time point of interest for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24, 48 and 72 hours post-transplantation

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
24 Hours48 Hours72 Hours
Control6.855.875.21
Experimental7.356.245.77

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants With a Serum Creatinine of More Than 3 mg/dL.

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. This endpoint is ascertaining slow graft function in the immediate days post-transplant. A participant was considered to have met this endpoint if their day 5 serum creatinine was greater than 3 mg/dL. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 5 post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental47.4
Control42.9

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection AMR or Suspicious for AMR.

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR or suspicious for AMR within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, C4d staining positive, or suspicious. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes; suspicious-when 2 of 3 factors for acute/active are present (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental3.8
Control1.4

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants Whose Day 5 Serum CRR Was Less Than 70%.

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 5 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function. A participant was considered to have met this endpoint if their day 5 serum CRR was less than 70%. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 5 post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental74.4
Control88.4

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants Whose Day 2 Serum CRR Was Less Than 30%.

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 2 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function. A participant was considered to have met this endpoint if their day 2 serum CRR was less than 30%. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 2 post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental57.1
Control68.6

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants Who Need Dialysis After Week 1.

Participants who needed dialysis after the first week post-transplant were considered to have met this endpoint. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 1 week to 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental9.0
Control2.8

[back to top]

The Difference Between the Mean eGFR (Modified MDRD) in the Experimental vs. Control Groups.

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the month 24 eGFR for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24-Month post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental52.45
Control57.35

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Primary Non-Function (PNF), Defined as Dialysis-dependency for More Than 3 Months.

Post-transplant dialysis is sometimes required in the setting of kidney transplant. If such dialysis continues for more than 3 months, the participant is considered to have PNF and, as such, meets this endpoint definition. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Transplantation through at least month 3 up to month 24

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Experimental2.8
Control0.9

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Only Graft Failure.

Participants who experienced graft failure were considered to have met this endpoint. Graft failure was defined as the need for post-transplant dialysis for more than 56 days. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental2.7
Control2.7

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Mycobacterial or Fungal Infections

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had at least one mycobacterial of fungal infection. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental6.1
Control6.3

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Malignancy.

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of malignancy. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Experimental1.8
Control0.9

[back to top]

BANFF Grades of First AMR.

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, or C4d staining positive. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Experimental0
Control0

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between 3 Months and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 3 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 3 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 14 days was used for month 3 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 3 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental2.7
Control4.4

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between 3 Months and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 3 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 3 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 14 days was used for month 3 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 3 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental2.8
Control4.8

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between 6 Months and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 6 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 6 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental0.8
Control4.8

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Locally Treated Rejection, Defined as Treatment Administered for Rejection Based on Clinical Signs or Biopsy Findings.

Biopsies were read by the local pathologist at the hospital where the participant was a patient. These local reads informed clinical care for the participant, which may or may not include prescribing/administering medication to the participant to help with clinical concerns or findings noted on a biopsy. Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they have a report of receiving treatment for clinical or biopsy-proven rejection during the 24 month post-transplant follow-up. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental16.2
Control27

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection AMR or Suspicious for AMR

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR or suspicious for AMR within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, C4d staining positive, or suspicious. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes; suspicious-when 2 of 3 factors for acute/active are present. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental2.8
Control0.0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR).

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, or C4d staining positive. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participant (Number)
Experimental1.3
Control0.0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR)

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, or C4d staining positive.Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Experimental0.0
Control0.0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Impaired Wound Healing Manifested by Wound Dehiscence, Wound Infection, or Hernia at the Site of the Transplant Incision

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of impaired wound healing at the site of the transplant incision manifested by one wound dehiscence, wound infection, or hernia. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Experimental7.9
Control11.6

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With BANFF Chronicity Scores > or Equal 2 on the 24 Month Biopsy.

The Banff 2013 classification involves scoring numerous characteristics of renal biopsy specimens. The ci (interstitial fibrosis) and ct (tubular atrophy) scores are two such characteristics. The scores can take values of 0, 1, 2, or 3 for each characteristic (ci and ct), indicating increasing severity of disease as the scores increase. Participants are considered to have met this endpoint if their ci + ct score on the 24 month biopsy summed to be > or equal to 2. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental73.1
Control36.4

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Any Infection Requiring Hospitalization or Resulting in Death.

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had an infection that required hospitalization or resulted in death. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental43.0
Control39.3

[back to top]

Percent of Participants That Required at Least One Dialysis Treatment.

Dialysis within the first week post-transplant is used in the setting of delayed graft function (DGF). Participants are considered to have had DGF if they had at least one dialysis treatment in the first week post-transplant. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 1 week post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental31.0
Control35.7

[back to top]

Number of Dialysis Sessions.

The number of dialysis sessions a person had during their first 8 weeks post-transplant was used for this endpoint. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 8 weeks post-transplantation

InterventionDialysis sessions (Mean)
Experimental0.14
Control0.26

[back to top]

eGFR Values as Measured by MDRD

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 7 post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental38.93
Control39.96

[back to top]

eGFR Values as Measured by CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 7 post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental41.01
Control41.85

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Death or Graft Failure.

Participants who died or experienced graft failure were considered to have met this endpoint. Graft failure was defined as the need for post-transplant dialysis for more than 56 days. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental5.3
Control7.1

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With de Novo DSA.

Donor specific antibody (DSA) can be formed post-transplant as part of the recipient's alloimmune response to the transplanted organ. DSA was determined by a central laboratory. Participants with newly developed DSA (i.e., de novo) following transplant were considered to have met this endpoint. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental8.0
Control3.6

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With CMV Viremia That Require a Change in Immunosuppression or Anti-viral Treatment as Per Standard of Care at the Site

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of CMV viremia that required a change in their existing immunosuppression or the use of anti-viral therapy. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental18.4
Control11.6

[back to top]

Days From Transplantation Until Event (ACR, AMR, or Hospitalization for Infection and/or Malignancy)

Participants are considered to have met this endpoint if they experienced biopsy-proven T-cell mediated rejection (ACR) or antibody mediated rejection (AMR) based on central pathology reading or were hospitalized for infection and/or malignancy. For participants who met one or more of these three components, the earliest event date of the three components was used as the time of meeting the endpoint. Participants who did not meet any of the three components were censored at their last date of follow-up. Event (or censor) day was calculated as event (or censor) date minus transplant date. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionDays to event (Median)
Experimental642
Control613

[back to top]

Creatinine Reduction Ratio (CRR), Defined as the First Creatinine on Day 5 Divided by the First Creatinine After Surgery.

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 5 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 5 post-transplantation

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
Experimental47.06
Control43.37

[back to top]

Creatinine Reduction Ratio (CRR), Defined as the First Creatinine on Day 2 Divided by he First Creatinine After Surgery

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 2 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 2 post-transplantation

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
Experimental24.28
Control20.97

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR)

Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection.Criteria include: IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 month post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental4.2
Control3.0

[back to top]

Number of Number of Participants Who Experience Graft Failure, Day 360 (D60)

Number of participants who experience graft failure by Day 360. All participants are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Day 360

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D602

[back to top]

Number of Number of Participants Who Experience Grades III-IV GVHD, Day 360 (D60)

Number of participants who experience grade III or IV GVHD by Day 360. All participants are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Day 360

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D6018

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Relapse, Day 360 (D60)

Number of participants who experience disease relapse by Day 360. All participants are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Day 360

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D6010

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Non-relapse Mortality, Days 90-180 (D90)

Number of participants who die for any reason other than disease relapse between Day 90 and Day 180. Only participants who are able to stop prophylactic tacrolimus at Day 90 are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Between Day 90 and Day 180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D901

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Non-relapse Mortality, Days 60-180 (D60)

Number of participants who die for any reason other than disease relapse between Day 60 and Day 180. Only participants who are able to stop prophylactic tacrolimus at Day 60 are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Between Day 60 and Day 180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D602

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Graft Failure, Days 60-180 (D60)

Number of participants who experience graft failure between Day 60 and Day 180. Only participants who are able to stop prophylactic tacrolimus at Day 60 are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Between Day 60 and Day 180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D601

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Graft Failure, Days 90-180 (D90)

Number of participants who experience graft failure between Day 90 and Day 180. Only participants who are able to stop prophylactic tacrolimus at Day 90 are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Between Day 90 and Day 180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D900

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Non-relapse Mortality, Day 360 (D60)

Number of participants who die for any reason other than disease relapse by Day 360. All participants are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Day 360

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D604

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Disease Relapse, Days 60-180 (D60)

Number of participants who experience disease relapse between Day 60 and Day 180. Only participants who are able to stop prophylactic tacrolimus at Day 60 are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Between Day 60 and Day 180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D6010

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Non-relapse Mortality, Day 360 (D90)

Number of participants who die for any reason other than disease relapse by Day 360. All participants are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Day 360

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D904

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Grades III-IV GVHD, Day 360 (D90)

Number of participants who experience grade III or IV GVHD by Day 360. All participants are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Day 360

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D9016

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Disease Relapse, Days 90-180 (D90)

Number of participants who experience disease relapse between Day 90 and Day 180. Only participants who are able to stop prophylactic tacrolimus at Day 90 are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Between Day 90 and Day 180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D9014

[back to top]

Number of Number of Participants With Severe Chronic GVHD, Day 360 (D90)

Number of participants who experience severe chronic GVHD requiring additional immunosuppressive therapy by Day 360. All participants are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Day 360

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D907

[back to top]

Number of Number of Participants With Severe Chronic GVHD, Day 360 (D60)

Number of participants who experience severe chronic GVHD requiring additional immunosuppressive therapy by Day 360. All participants are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Day 360

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D605

[back to top]

Number of Number of Participants Who Experience Graft Failure, Day 360 (D90)

Number of participants who experience graft failure by Day 360. All participants are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Day 360

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D900

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Are Able to Stop Prophylactic Tacrolimus (D90 Cohort)

This outcome measures the feasibility of stopping prophylactic tacrolimus at Day 90. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Day 90

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D9033

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Are Able to Stop Prophylactic Tacrolimus (D60 Cohort)

This outcome measures the feasibility of stopping prophylactic tacrolimus at Day 60. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Day 60

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D6042

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grades III-IV Acute GVHD, Days 90-180 (D90)

Number of participants who experience grade III or IV acute GVHD between Day 90 and Day 180. Only participants who are able to stop prophylactic tacrolimus at Day 90 are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Between Day 90 and Day 180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D901

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grades III-IV Acute GVHD, Days 60-180 (D60)

Number of participants who experience grade III or IV acute GVHD between Day 60 and Day 180. Only participants who are able to stop prophylactic tacrolimus at Day 60 are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Between Day 60 and Day 180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D603

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Chronic GVHD, Days 90-180 (D90)

Number of participants who experience chronic GVHD requiring additional immunosuppressive therapy between Day 90 and Day 180. Only participants who are able to stop prophylactic tacrolimus at Day 90 are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Between Day 90 and Day 180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D902

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Chronic GVHD, Days 60-180 (D60)

Number of participants who experience chronic GVHD requiring additional immunosuppressive therapy between Day 60 and Day 180. Only participants who are able to stop prophylactic tacrolimus at Day 60 are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Between Day 60 and Day 180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D601

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Relapse, Day 360 (D90)

Number of participants who experience disease relapse by Day 360. All participants are evaluable. (NCT02556931)
Timeframe: Day 360

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PBSCT D9014

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Primary Disease Relapse

Incidence of primary disease relapse and non-relapse related death will be reported per standard definitions. These will be treated as competing risk events. (NCT02588339)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Panobinostat (PANO) Therapy7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival: Time from transplant date to death from any cause. Time-to-event data such as overall survival is measured from the date of transplantation. OS will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02588339)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Panobinostat (PANO) Therapy87

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Relapse-free Survival (RFS)

Relapse-free survival: Time from transplant date to death or primary disease relapse. Time-to-event data such as relapse-free survival is measured from the date of transplantation. RFS will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02588339)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Panobinostat (PANO) Therapy77

[back to top]

Number of Participants Stratified by Acute Graft Versus Host Disease GVHD Stage

Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD grades II-IV by day 100. Investigators will consider ≥43% incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD not acceptable. Investigators will use 23% incidence rate of GVHD as target. GVHD severity stage and grading and distribution will be measured weekly from day of transplant to day 90 +/- 14 using standard scoring system. Stage of GVHD will be given for each site of involvement (e.g. skin, liver, and gut), as well as a composite score for overall acute GVHD grade. Pathologic confirmation of aGVHD will be dictated by usual clinical practice, and not mandated by this protocol. (NCT02588339)
Timeframe: 100 days post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade II GVHDGrade III GVHD
Panobinostat (PANO) Therapy61

[back to top]

Number of Participants Stratified by Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) Stage

GVHD with onset after 100 days post-HCT with presence of at least one diagnostic manifestation of chronic c-GVHD or distinct manifestation confirmed by biopsy or other relevant tests (e.g., PFT). Classified as: 1- Classic chronic GVHD - meets criteria for chronic GVHD and has no features consistent with aGVHD or 2-Overlap syndrome - features of acute and chronic GVHD exist together. C-GVHD will be measured prospectively in all participants on days 90+/-14 , 120 +/- 14, 150 +/- 14, 180+/- 14, 270+/- 30, and 365 +/- 30 as per standardized scoring system. (NCT02588339)
Timeframe: 100 days post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Mild GVHDModerate GVHD
Panobinostat (PANO) Therapy102

[back to top]

Time to Stable Engraftment

Stable engraftment for white blood count (WBC) is defined as a sustained absolute neutrophil count > 500 over 3 days without cytokine support. Stable platelet engraftments is defined as count of > 20,000 over 7 days without transfusion support. Time to engraftment is defined as time from day 0 to day of sustained engraftment per above criteria for both platelets and WBC. (NCT02588339)
Timeframe: 100 days post transplant

Interventiondays (Median)
ANC engraftmentPlatelet engraftment
Panobinostat (PANO) Therapy1516

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Non-relapse Mortality

Incidence of primary disease relapse and non-relapse related death will be reported per standard definitions. These will be treated as competing risk events. Non-relapse death is defined as death in continuous remission from primary disease requiring transplantation. (NCT02588339)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Panobinostat (PANO) Therapy1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

(NCT02652468)
Timeframe: Median follow up of 1689 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant352

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Absolute Neutrophil Count >= 500/Mcl for 3 Consecutive Measurements on Different Days and Platelet Count > 20,000/mm^3 With no Platelet Transfusions in the Preceding 7 Days

To determine engraftment of neutrophils and platelets at 28 days following alpha/beta T-cell depletion using Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) haploidentical donors for stem cell transplant in relapsed lymphoma. (NCT02652468)
Timeframe: At day 28 after transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade III-IV Acute GVHD as Determined by International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) Severity Index Criteria

The number of participants with grade III - IV acute Graft versus host disease (GVHD) by Day +100 is reported. (NCT02652468)
Timeframe: Day +100

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant3

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival will be analyzed as time before any progression by either Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) or bone marrow, (NCT02652468)
Timeframe: Median follow up of 1689 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant352

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Graft Failure

Graft failure - defined as < 5% donor chimerism in the CD3 and/or CD33 selected cell populations at any time during the study follow up period once initial engraftment has been achieved. (NCT02652468)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years after graft

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Severe Chronic GVHD

The number of participants with severe chronic GVHD by Day +180 will be reported. (NCT02652468)
Timeframe: Day +180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant0

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

A DLT was defined as: any Grade III or higher non-hematologic toxicity not clearly related to the underlying malignancy, intercurrent infection, or the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioning regimen; any death not related to relapse or intercurrent infection; and failure to engraft by day 30. Event grading was based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.03 criteria. Hypersensitivity reactions and other infusion-related reactions were not considered DLTs. (NCT02663622)
Timeframe: Up to 32 days for the Placebo, CD24Fc 240 mg, and CD24Fc 480 mg arms. Up to 62 days for the CD24Fc 960 mg arm.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo0
CD24Fc 240 mg0
CD24Fc 480 mg0
CD24Fc 960 mg0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Non-Relapse Mortality (NRM) Following HCT

The percentage of participants who experienced NRM is presented as cumulative incidence of NRM. The cumulative incidence (%) of NRM at approximately 1 year following HCT and the 95% CI were estimated using the cumulative incidence function with relapse as a competing risk. If the maximum observed time is < Study Day 380, the cumulative incidence at the maximum observed time will be presented. (NCT02663622)
Timeframe: Up to 380 days

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo16.7
CD24Fc 240 mg16.7
CD24Fc 480 mg0.0
CD24Fc 960 mg0.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HCT)

OS is defined as the time from HCT to death due to any cause. Participants were censored at 380 days for the Placebo, CD24Fc 240 mg, and CD24Fc 480 mg arms, and at 366 days for the CD24Fc 960 mg arm. (NCT02663622)
Timeframe: Up to 380 days for the Placebo, CD24Fc 240 mg, and CD24Fc 480 mg arms. Up to 366 days for the CD24Fc 960 mg arm.

InterventionDays (Mean)
Placebo276.3
CD24Fc 240 mg343.0
CD24Fc 480 mg343.5
CD24Fc 960 mg321.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Chronic GVHD Following HCT

The percentage of participants who experienced chronic GVHD will be presented as cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD. Chronic GVHD assessments occurred approximately quarterly beginning on Day 100 after HCT until 1 year after HCT. The cumulative incidence (%) of chronic GVHD at 1 year post-HCT and the 95% CI were estimated using the cumulative incidence function with death without chronic GVHD as a competing risk. If the maximum observed time was NCT02663622)
Timeframe: Up to 380 days

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo33.3
CD24Fc 240 mg50.0
CD24Fc 480 mg50.0
CD24Fc 960 mg83.3

[back to top]

Open Label Expansion Arm Only: Grade III-IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Free Survival (AGFS)

AGFS was defined as the time from the date of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) to the earliest of Grade III-IV acute GVHD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Event grading was based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.03 criteria. Participants were censored at 181 days. (NCT02663622)
Timeframe: Up to 181 days

InterventionDays (Mean)
CD24Fc 960 mg159.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The number of participants who experienced an AE is presented. As described in the protocol, AEs reported after the protocol-specified timeframe were not analyzed in this outcome measure: 1 day prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) through either 30 or 60 days post-HCT, depending on arm as defined in the Time Frame section. (NCT02663622)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 32 days for the Placebo, CD24Fc 240 mg, and CD24Fc 480 mg arms. Up to approximately 62 days for the CD24Fc 960 mg arm.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo6
CD24Fc 240 mg6
CD24Fc 480 mg6
CD24Fc 960 mg6

[back to top]

Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HCT)

RFS is defined as the time from HCT to relapse or death due to any cause. Participants were censored at 380 days for the Placebo, CD24Fc 240 mg, and CD24Fc 480 mg arms, and at 366 days for the CD24Fc 960 mg arm. (NCT02663622)
Timeframe: Up to 380 days for the Placebo, CD24Fc 240 mg, and CD24Fc 480 mg arms. Up to 366 days for the CD24Fc 960 mg arm

InterventionDays (Mean)
Placebo232.7
CD24Fc 240 mg342.5
CD24Fc 480 mg335.2
CD24Fc 960 mg296.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented. (NCT02663622)
Timeframe: 1 day for the Placebo, CD24Fc 240 mg, and CD24Fc 480 mg arms. Up to approximately 30 days for the CD24Fc 960 mg arm.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo1
CD24Fc 240 mg0
CD24Fc 480 mg0
CD24Fc 960 mg0

[back to top]

GVHD-Free and Relapse-Free Survival (GRFS) Following HCT

This GRFS following HCT is a composite endpoint in which events included Grade III to IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy, relapse, or death from any cause (NCT02663622)
Timeframe: Up to 380 days

InterventionDays (Mean)
Placebo178.7
CD24Fc 240 mg260.5
CD24Fc 480 mg250.3
CD24Fc 960 mg227.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Relapse Following HCT

The percentage of participants who experienced relapse of disease is presented as cumulative incidence of relapse. The cumulative incidence (%) of relapse at approximately 1 year following HCT and the 95% CI were estimated using the cumulative incidence function with death without relapse as a competing risk. If the maximum observed time is < Study Day 380, the cumulative incidence at the maximum observed time is presented. (NCT02663622)
Timeframe: Up to 380 days

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo33.3
CD24Fc 240 mg0.0
CD24Fc 480 mg16.7
CD24Fc 960 mg16.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Infection Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HCT)

The percentage of participants who experienced infection by approximately 101 days following HCT is presented. (NCT02663622)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 101 days

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo33.3
CD24Fc 240 mg83.3
CD24Fc 480 mg33.3
CD24Fc 960 mg100.0

[back to top]

Grade II-IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Free Survival (AGFS)

AGFS was defined as the time from the date of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) to the earliest of Grade II-IV acute GVHD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Event grading was based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.03 criteria. Participants were censored at 195 days for the Placebo, CD24Fc 240 mg, and CD24Fc 480 mg arms, and at 181 days for the CD24Fc 960 mg arm. (NCT02663622)
Timeframe: Up to 195 days for the Placebo, CD24Fc 240 mg, and CD24Fc 480 mg arms. Up to 181 days for the CD24Fc 960 mg arm.

InterventionDays (Mean)
Placebo144.2
CD24Fc 240 mg145.7
CD24Fc 480 mg116.2
CD24Fc 960 mg125.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade II to IV Acute GVHD Following HCT

The percentage of participants who experienced grade II to IV acute GVHD is presented as cumulative incidence of Grade II to IV acute GVHD by approximately 108 days following HCT. Event grading was based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.03 criteria. The cumulative incidence (%) of acute GVHD and the 95% CI were estimated using the cumulative incidence function with death without Grade II to IV acute GVHD as a competing risk. (NCT02663622)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 108 days

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo16.7
CD24Fc 240 mg33.3
CD24Fc 480 mg50.0
CD24Fc 960 mg33.3

[back to top]

Percentage of DSA Positive Participants With DSA Persistence

DSA was regarded as persistent under the following conditions: (i) DSA was detected and remained above the threshold for positivity (MFI = 1000) for two consecutive or nonconsecutive measurements, or (ii) the new appearance of a DSA at the threshold for positivity when preceded by a DSA of a different specificity that had subsequently become non-detectable. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily73.3
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID50

[back to top]

Percentage of DSA Positive Participants With Human Leukocyte Antigen, Class II, DQ Locus (HLA-DQ)

Percentage of DSA positive participants with HLA-DQ Class-II were reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily40
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID25

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Died

Percentage of participants who died were reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily0.7
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID0.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Lost to Follow-up

Percentage of participants who were lost to follow-up were reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily0
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID0.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive for de Novo DSA (dnDSA) or Immune Activation (IA) Occurrence

DSA was considered as a categorical (binary) variable with positivity determined at a threshold criteria approaching mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)=1000 at any time during the study. IA was considered either present or absent using the Trugraf™ v2.0 molecular assay. A negative designation (Trugraf TX Normal) was referred to as Immune Quiescence (IQ). Due to operating characteristics of the assay, a positive designation was considered evidence of IA in all participants. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily35.6
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID34.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive for IA Occurrence From Day 1 to Day 365 Visit

IA was considered either present or absent using the Trugraf™ v2.0 molecular assay. A negative designation (Trugraf TX Normal) was referred to as Immune Quiescence (IQ). Due to operating characteristics of the assay, a positive designation was considered evidence of IA in all participants. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From day 1 to day 365 visit

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily31.3
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID31.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive for IA Occurrence From Day 30 to Day 365 Visit

IA was considered either present or absent using the Trugraf™ v2.0 molecular assay. A negative designation (Trugraf TX Normal) was referred to as Immune Quiescence (IQ). Due to operating characteristics of the assay, a positive designation was considered evidence of IA in all participants. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From day 30 to day 365 visit

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily21.8
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID21.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Five-point Decline in eGFR

The eGFR was calculated using the MDRD formula. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From 30 days post transplant until 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily13.1
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID11.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Acute ABMR

Percentage of participants with acute ABMR were reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily1.6
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID0.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection (TCMR)

Percentage of participants with acute TCMR were reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily6.5
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID5.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Any Additional Findings

Percentage of participants with any additional findings (other than Normal biopsy, borderline changes, acute and chronic ABMR, Grade I, II, and III ABMR, C4D deposition, acute and chronic TCMR, Grade I, II, and III TCMR, Grade I, II and III IFTA, acute tubular necrosis, interstitial nephritis, pyelonephritis, bk virus, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, hemolytic uremic syndrome and recurrent disease) were reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily29.3
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID34.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Any Antibody-Mediated Rejection (ABMR)

Percentage of participants with ABMR were reported. Central pathology reading was performed as per the 2007 Update to the Banff '97 classification. A positive assessment is defined as antibody mediated changes that are diagnosed as either acute ABMR or chronic active ABMR. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily1.6
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID0.7

[back to top]

Peak Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) of DSA Positive Participants

Peak MFI of DSA positive participants was reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventionfluorescence intensity unit (Median)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily6119.21
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID2727.99

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Glomerular Basement Membrane Double Contours (cg) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores

Central pathology reading was performed as per the 2007 Update to the Banff '97 classification. Banff Lesion Scores assess the presence and the degree of histopathological changes in the different compartments of renal transplant biopsies, focusing primarily but not exclusively on the diagnostic features seen in rejection. [Roufosse C et. al 2018]. Here, Score 0= No GBM double contours by light microscopy (LM) or electron microscopy (EM), Score 1= No GBM double contours by LM but GBM double contours (incomplete or circumferential) in at least 3 glomerular capillaries by EM or Double contours of the GBM in 1-25% of capillary loops in the most affected nonsclerotic glomerulus by LM , Score 2= Double contours affecting 26 to 50% of peripheral capillary loops in the most affected-glomerulus and Score 3= Double contours affecting more than 50% of peripheral capillary loops in the most affected-glomerulus. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Banff Lesion Score 0Banff Lesion Score 1Banff Lesion Score 2Banff Lesion Score 3Not able to score
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily93.55.7000.8
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID93.43.71.501.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Presence of Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy (IFTA) and Inflammation on Biopsy

IFTA and inflammation was defined as IFTA positive and inflammation positive (i >0) on centrally-interpreted institutional protocol biopsy or biopsy obtained for cause during the first year posttransplant, with +2 months visit window. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily26
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID16.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Presence of Microcirculatory Inflammation (MI) on Biopsy

MI was defined as glomerulitis (g) + peritubular capillaritis (ptc)>=2 on centrally-interpreted institutional protocol biopsy or biopsy obtained for cause during the first year post-transplant, with +2 months visit window. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily8.9
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID5.9

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of HLA-DQ DSA

Time to first occurrence of HLA-DQ DSA was reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once DailyNA
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BIDNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Presence of Transplant Glomerulopathy (TG) on Biopsy

TG was defined as chronic glomerulopathy (cg) >0 on centrally-interpreted institutional protocol biopsy or biopsy obtained for cause during the first year post-transplant with +2 months visit window. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily6.5
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID6.6

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of Acute Forms of ABMR

Time to first occurrence of acute forms of ABMR was reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once DailyNA
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BIDNA

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of Acute TCMR

Time to first occurrence of acute TCMR was reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once DailyNA
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BIDNA

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of Borderline Changes

Time to first occurrence of borderline changes was reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once DailyNA
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BIDNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Arteriolar Hyalinosis (ah) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores

Central pathology reading was performed as per the 2007 Update to the Banff '97 classification. Banff Lesion Scores assess the presence and the degree of histopathological changes in the different compartments of renal transplant biopsies, focusing primarily but not exclusively on the diagnostic features seen in rejection. [Roufosse C et. al 2018]. Here, Score 0= No periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-positive hyaline arteriolar thickening, Score 1= Mild to moderate PAS-positive hyaline thickening in at least 1 arteriole, Score 2= Moderate to severe PAS-positive hyaline thickening in more than 1 arteriole and Score 3= Severe PAS-positive hyaline thickening in many arterioles. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Banff Lesion Score 0Banff Lesion Score 1Banff Lesion Score 2Banff Lesion Score 3Not able to score
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily91.14.14.100.8
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID86.85.93.72.21.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive, Negative or Indeterminate for dnDSA Occurrence

DSA was considered as a categorical (binary) variable with positivity determined at a threshold criteria approaching MFI=1000 at any time during the study. Indeterminate was defined as MFI signal was >1000 and DSA was suspected, but could not be confirmed due to inadequate donor typing. Participants whose samples for the test were not available were reported as unknown. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PositiveNegativeIndeterminateUnknown
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily5.590.540
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID4.392.82.50.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive or Negative for DSA Immunoglobulin G (IgG3) Isotype

Percentage of participants who were positive or negative for IgG3 isotype were reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PositiveNegative
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily0.799.3
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID1.198.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive or Negative for Complement Component 1, Q Subcomponent (C1q)-Binding DSA

Percentage of participants who were positive or negative for C1q-binding DSA were reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PositiveNegative
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily1.898.2
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID0.499.6

[back to top]

Percentage of DSA Positive Participants With Weak, Moderate and Strong Antibody Strentgh

DSA was considered as a categorical (binary) variable with positivity determined at a threshold criteria approaching MFI=1000 at any time during the study. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
WeakModerateStrong
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily073.326.7
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID083.316.7

[back to top]

eGFR at Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 270 and Day 365

The eGFR was calculated using the MDRD formula. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: Day 30, day 90, day 180, day 270 and day 365

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Day 30Day 90Day 180Day 270Day 365
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily50.8655.5656.8157.1958.25
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID52.7257.1058.3359.0460.94

[back to top]

Time to Occurrence of Death

Time to occurrence of death was reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventiondays (Median)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once DailyNA
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BIDNA

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of TG on Biopsy

Time to first occurrence of TG on biopsy was reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once DailyNA
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BIDNA

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of Local BPAR

Time to first occurrence of local BPAR was reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once DailyNA
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BIDNA

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of IFTA

Time to first occurrence of IFTA was reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once DailyNA
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BIDNA

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of IA

Time to first occurrence of IA was reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once DailyNA
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BIDNA

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of C1q-binding DSA

Time to first occurrence of C1q-binding DSA was reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once DailyNA
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BIDNA

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of Chronic Forms of ABMR

Time to first occurrence of chronic forms of ABMR was reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once DailyNA
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BIDNA

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of Chronic TCMR

Time to first occurrence of chronic TCMR was reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once DailyNA
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BIDNA

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of DSA

DSA was considered as a categorical (binary) variable with positivity determined at a threshold criteria approaching MFI=1000 at any time during the study. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once DailyNA
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BIDNA

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of DSA IgG3 Isotype

Time to first occurrence of DSA IgG3 isotype was reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once DailyNA
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BIDNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Intimal Arteritis (v) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores

Central pathology reading was performed as per the 2007 Update to the Banff '97 classification. Banff Lesion Scores assess the presence and the degree of histopathological changes in the different compartments of renal transplant biopsies, focusing primarily but not exclusively on the diagnostic features seen in rejection. [Roufosse C et. al 2018]. Here, Score 0= No arteritis, Score 1= Mild to moderate intimal arteritis in at least 1 arterial cross section, Score 2= Severe intimal arteritis with at least 25% luminal area lost in at least 1 arterial cross section and Score 3= Transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and medial smooth muscle necrosis with lymphocytic infiltrate in vessel. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Banff Lesion Score 0Banff Lesion Score 1Banff Lesion Score 2Banff Lesion Score 3Not able to score
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily93.52.42.401.6
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID94.92.2002.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Borderline Changes

Percentage of participants with borderline changes were reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily14.6
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID14.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Vascular Fibrous Intimal Thickening (cv) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores

Central pathology reading was performed as per the 2007 Update to the Banff '97 classification. Banff Lesion Scores assess the presence and the degree of histopathological changes in the different compartments of renal transplant biopsies, focusing primarily but not exclusively on the diagnostic features seen in rejection. [Roufosse C et. al 2018]. Here, Score 0= No chronic vascular changes, Score 1= Vascular narrowing of up to 25% luminal area by fibrointimal thickening, Score 2= Vascular narrowing of 26 to 50% luminal area by fibrointimal thickening and Score 3= Vascular narrowing of more than 50% luminal area by fibrointimal thickening. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Banff Lesion Score 0Banff Lesion Score 1Banff Lesion Score 2Banff Lesion Score 3Not able to score
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily33.340.7222.41.6
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID3641.217.62.22.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Tubulitis (t) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores

Central pathology reading was performed as per the 2007 Update to the Banff '97 classification. Banff Lesion Scores assess the presence and the degree of histopathological changes in the different compartments of renal transplant biopsies, focusing primarily but not exclusively on the diagnostic features seen in rejection. [Roufosse C et. al 2018]. Here, Score 0= No mononuclear cells in tubules or single focus of tubulitis only, Score 1= Foci with 1 to 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section (or 10 tubular cells), Score 2= Foci with 5 to 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section (or 10 tubular cells) and Score 3= Foci with >10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or the presence of ≥2 areas of tubular basement membrane destruction accompanied by i2/i3 inflammation and t2 elsewhere. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Banff Lesion Score 0Banff Lesion Score 1Banff Lesion Score 2Banff Lesion Score 3Not able to score
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily79.716.31.61.60.8
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID79.415.41.52.90.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Tubular Atrophy (ct) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores

Central pathology reading was performed as per the 2007 Update to the Banff '97 classification. Banff Lesion Scores assess the presence and the degree of histopathological changes in the different compartments of renal transplant biopsies, focusing primarily but not exclusively on the diagnostic features seen in rejection. [Roufosse C et. al 2018]. Here, Score 0= No tubular atrophy, Score 1= Tubular atrophy involving up to 25% of the area of cortical tubules, Score 2= Tubular atrophy involving 26 to 50% of the area of cortical tubules and Score 3= Tubular atrophy involving in >50% of the area of cortical tubules. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Banff Lesion Score 0Banff Lesion Score 1Banff Lesion Score 2Banff Lesion Score 3Not able to score
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily20.353.719.55.70.8
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID21.355.915.46.60.7

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Normal Biopsy Findings

Percentage of participants with normal biopsy findings were reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily6.5
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID4.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With IA Persistence

IA was regarded as persistent under the following conditions: (i) IA was detected and remained above the threshold for positivity for two consecutive or non-consecutive measurements, or (ii) the new appearance of an IA at the threshold for positivity when preceded by an IA of a different specificity that had subsequently become non-detectable. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily7.3
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID10

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss

Graft loss was defined as re-transplantation, transplant nephrectomy, or a return to dialysis for at least a six week duration, or participants' death. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily1.5
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID1.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Threshold of <30 Millimetre Per Minute Per 1.73 Meter Square (mL/Min/1.73m^2)

The eGFR was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: At 1 year post transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily1.5
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID1.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Either Graft Loss, Death, BPAR or Lost to Follow-up

Percentage of participants with either graft loss, death, BPAR or lost to follow-up were reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily9.1
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID10.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With eGFR Threshold of <50 mL/Min/1.73m^2

The eGFR was calculated using the MDRD formula. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: At 1 year post transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily25.5
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID19.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With eGFR Threshold of <40 mL/Min/1.73m^2

The eGFR was calculated using the MDRD formula. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: At 1 year post transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily9.5
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID5.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic TCMR

Percentage of participants with chronic TCMR were reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily25
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID12.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic ABMR

Percentage of participants with chronic ABMR were reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily0
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With C4d Deposition Without Active Rejection

Percentage of participants with C4d deposition without active rejection were reported. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily0.8
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID0.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)

Positivity was determined by local biopsy, central pathology, or reported adverse events. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily7.6
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID8.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Peritubular Capillaritis (Ptc) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores

Central pathology reading was performed as per the 2007 Update to the Banff '97 classification. Banff Lesion Scores assess the presence and the degree of histopathological changes in the different compartments of renal transplant biopsies, focusing primarily but not exclusively on the diagnostic features seen in rejection. [Roufosse C et. al 2018]. Here, Score 0= Maximum number of leukocytes <3, Score 1= At least 1 leukocyte cell in ≥10% of cortical PTCs with 3-4 leukocytes in most severely involved PTC, Score 2= At least 1 leukocyte in ≥10% of cortical PTC with 5-10 leukocytes in most severely involved PTC and Score 3= At least 1 leukocyte in ≥10% of cortical PTC with >10 leukocytes in most severely involved PTC. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Banff Lesion Score 0Banff Lesion Score 1Banff Lesion Score 2Banff Lesion Score 3Not able to score
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily91.13.34.900.8
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID90.45.12.90.70.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Mononuclear Cell Interstitial Inflammation (i) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores

Central pathology reading was performed as per the 2007 Update to the Banff '97 classification. Banff Lesion Scores assess the presence and the degree of histopathological changes in the different compartments of renal transplant biopsies, focusing primarily but not exclusively on the diagnostic features seen in rejection. [Roufosse C et. al 2018]. Here, Score 0= No inflammation or in less than 10% of unscarred cortical parenchyma, Score 1= Inflammation in 10 to 25% of unscarred cortical parenchyma, Score 2= Inflammation in 26 to 50% of unscarred cortical parenchyma and Score 3= Inflammation in more than 50% of unscarred cortical parenchyma. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Banff Lesion Score 0Banff Lesion Score 1Banff Lesion Score 2Banff Lesion Score 3Not able to score
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily68.326.84.100.8
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID76.517.62.22.90.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Mesangial Matrix Expansion (mm) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores

Central pathology reading was performed as per the 2007 Update to the Banff '97 classification. Banff Lesion Scores assess the presence and the degree of histopathological changes in the different compartments of renal transplant biopsies, focusing primarily but not exclusively on the diagnostic features seen in rejection. [Roufosse C et. al 2018]. Here, Score 0= No more than mild mesangial matrix increase in any glomerulus, Score 1= At least moderate mesangial matrix increase in up to 25% of nonsclerotic glomeruli, Score 2= At least moderate mesangial matrix increase in 26% to 50% of nonsclerotic glomeruli and Score 3= At least moderate mesangial matrix increase in >50% of nonsclerotic glomeruli. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Banff Lesion Score 0Banff Lesion Score 1Banff Lesion Score 2Banff Lesion Score 3Not able to score
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily87.88.92.400.8
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID91.26.60.701.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Interstitial Fibrosis (ci) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores

Central pathology reading was performed as per the 2007 Update to the Banff '97 classification. Banff Lesion Scores assess the presence and the degree of histopathological changes in the different compartments of renal transplant biopsies, focusing primarily but not exclusively on the diagnostic features seen in rejection. [Roufosse C et. al 2018]. Here, Score 0= Interstitial fibrosis in up to 5% of cortical area, Score 1= Interstitial fibrosis in 6 to 25%of cortical area (mild interstitial fibrosis), Score 2= Interstitial fibrosis in 26 to 50% of cortical area (moderate interstitial fibrosis) and Score 3= Interstitial fibrosis in >50% of cortical area (severe interstitial fibrosis). (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Banff Lesion Score 0Banff Lesion Score 1Banff Lesion Score 2Banff Lesion Score 3Not able to score
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily21.152.819.55.70.8
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID20.656.615.46.60.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade I, II and III IFTA

Percentage of participants with Grade I, II and III IFTA were reported. Central pathology reading was performed as per the 2007 Update to the Banff '97 classification. IFTA was graded as Grade I: mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (<25% of cortical area), Grade II: moderate interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (26-50% of cortical area), and Grade III: severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy/ loss (>50% of cortical area). (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade IGrade IIGrade III
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily54.518.75.7
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID56.615.46.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade I, II and III Acute ABMR

Percentage of participants with grade I, II and III acute ABMR were reported. Central pathology reading was performed as per the 2007 Update to the Banff '97 classification. Acute ABMR was graded as Grade I: acute tubular necrosis-like -like minimal inflammation, Grade II: Capillary and or glomerular inflammation (ptc/g >0) and/or thromboses, and Grade III: arterial - v3. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade IGrade IIGrade III
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily50500
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID01000

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Glomerulitis (g) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores

Central pathology reading was performed as per the 2007 Update to the Banff '97 classification. Banff Lesion Scores assess the presence and the degree of histopathological changes in the different compartments of renal transplant biopsies, focusing primarily but not exclusively on the diagnostic features seen in rejection. [Roufosse C et. al 2018]. Here, Score 0= No glomerulitis, Score 1= <25% glomerulitis, Score 2= 25 to 75% glomerulitis and Score 3= >75% glomerulitis. (NCT02723591)
Timeframe: From date of transplant until month 14

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Banff Lesion Score 0Banff Lesion Score 1Banff Lesion Score 2Banff Lesion Score 3Not able to score
Tacrolimus, Extended Release (Astagraf XL®) Once Daily89.45.74.100.8
Tacrolimus, Immediate Release BID90.46.61.501.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Having Any Abnormality of Potential Clinical Importance of Vital Signs Results

Vital signs parameters included analysis of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR) and body temperature. Number of participants with any abnormality of potential clinical importance (high or low) in any of these vitals signs at any time post Baseline visit have been presented. PCI (high or low) was considered if SBP (low: <85, high:>160), DBP (low: <45, high>100), HR (low: <40, high: >110) and temperature (low: <35.5, high: >37.5). (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SBP, HighSBP, LowDBP, HighDBP, LowHR, HighTemperature, HighTemperature, Low
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV5121112

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Are Dialysis Independent at Visits up to 12 Months Post-transplant

Number of participants who are dialysis independent at visits up to 12 months post transplant was evaluated to assess the effect of GSK1070806 on dialysis dependency and graft survival. (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Requiring Dialysis During the First 7 Days Post Transplant

The requirement of dialysis (except as needed for hyperkalaemia during the first 24 hours [hrs]) were used to assess the frequency of delayed graft function (DGF) in donation after circulatory death (DCD) renal transplant recipients treated with GSK1070806. The 'Analysis Population' (AP) is defined as participants in the 'All Subjects' Population who have been declared to have DGF or have reached 7 days. (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Up to Day 7

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV4

[back to top]

Number of Participants in the First 7 Days With: Primary Non Function, Functional DGF, Intermediate Graft Function, Immediate Graft Function

Number of participants in the first 7 days with primary non function, functional DGF, intermediate graft function and immediate graft function were evaluated to access graft function in DCD renal transplant recipients treated with GSK1070806. The AP Population is defined as participants in the 'All Subjects' Population who have been declared to have DGF or have reached 7 days. (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Up to Day 7

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Primary Non Function3 day Functional DGF7 day Functional DGF3 day Intermediate Graft Function7 day Intermediate Graft Function3 day Immediate Graft Function7 day Immediate Graft Function
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV1350110

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment were categorized as SAE. (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEAny SAE
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV76

[back to top]

Serum Concentrations of GSK1070806

Serial blood samples were collected to evaluate PK of GSK1070806 at Pre-operative, 0.75 hours, 4-8 hours, 24 hours, 168 hours, Day 30, Day 90, 6 months and 12 months after kidney reperfusion. PK Population included participants in the 'All Subjects' Population for whom a serum PK sample is obtained and analyzed for GSK1070806. (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Pre-operative, 0.75 hours, 4-8 hours, 24 hours, 168 hours, Day 30, Day 90, 6 months and 12 months after kidney reperfusion

InterventionNanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Pre-operative, n=70.75 hours, n=64-8 hours, n=624 hours, n=6168 hours, n=5Day 30, n=6Day 90, n=76 months, n=712 months, n=6
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV0.058783.360033.350933.328260.017366.75047.01083.419.2

[back to top]

Serum Creatinine at Baseline and Change From Baseline Over Time Post Transplant

Blood samples were collected to measure serum creatinine at the indicated timepoints to assess graft function in DCD renal transplant recipients treated with GSK1070806. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment value. Change from Baseline was post Baseline value minus Baseline value. NA indicates data is not available as standard deviation could not be calculated due to n=1. The AP Population is defined as participants having Baseline and at least one post-Baseline assessment. (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 12 months

InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Screening, n=7Day 0, n=7Day 1, n=7Day 2, n=7Day 3, n=7Day 4, n=7Day 5, n=6Day 6, n=6Day 7, n=6Day 8, n=5Day 9, n=3Day 10, n=3Day 11, n=3Day 12, n=2Day 13, n=2Day 14, n=2Day 15, n=2Day 16, n=2Day 17, n=2Day 18, n=2Day 19, n=2Day 20, n=2Day 21, n=1Day 22, n=1Day 23, n=1Day 24, n=1Day 25, n=1Day 26, n=1Day 27, n=1Day 28, n=1Day 30, n=7Day 90, n=76 months, n=712 months, n=6
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV679.0-39.3-44.7-99.0-36.7-104.6-57.2-75.7-43.5-150.8-24.0-53.0-97.0110.038.04.0-51.0-61.5-107.5-145.0-173.5-183.5-117.0-91.0-95.0-115.0-152.0-155.0-175.0-191.0-478.3-489.9-467.4-490.5

[back to top]

Serum Interferon Gamma-induced Protein 10 (IP-10) and Serum Monokine Induced Gamma Interferon (Mig) Levels at Baseline and Change From Baseline Over Time Post Transplant

The interferon-gamma -inducible chemokine IP10 and the interferon-gamma -inducible chemokine Mig have been identified as an early predictive marker of antibody-mediated kidney graft rejection. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment value. Change from Baseline was calculated as post Baseline value minus Baseline value. (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 0.75 hours, 4-8 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 30, Day 90, 6 months and 12 months post reperfusion

InterventionPicograms per milliliter (Mean)
IP-10, Baseline, n=7IP-10, Day 0, 0.75 hour, n=6IP-10, Day 0, 4-8 hour, n=6IP-10, Day 1, n=6IP-10, Day 2, n=5IP-10, Day 30, n=6IP-10, Day 90, n=7IP-10, 6 months, n=7IP-10, 12 months, n=5Mig, Baseline, n=7Mig, Day 0, 0.75 hour, n=6Mig, Day 0, 4-8 hour, n=6Mig, Day 1, n=6Mig, Day 2, n=5Mig, Day 30, n=6Mig, Day 90, n=7Mig, 6 months, n=7Mig, 12 months, n=5
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV518.83817-48.36607-262.30099-214.27224-91.07498-215.96831221.97286145.05039241.29317175.76865-14.02145-49.28436-67.61716-133.99600-159.17646-78.69081-43.68148-30.52711

[back to top]

Urine Volume at Baseline and Change From Baseline Over Time Post Transplant

Urine volume at Baseline and over time post transplant was measured to assess graft function in DCD renal transplant recipients treated with GSK1070806. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment value. Change from Baseline was post Baseline value minus Baseline value. All Subjects Population comprised of participants who received the dose of study medication. (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-operative) and up to Day 28

InterventionLiter (Mean)
Baseline (Pre-operative), n=5Day 0, n=4Day 1, n=5Day 2, n=5Day 3, n=5Day 4, n=5Day 5, n=4Day 6, n=4Day 7, n=4Day 8, n=3Day 9, n=2Day 10, n=2Day 11, n=2Day 12, n=1Day 13, n=1Day 14, n=1Day 15, n=1Day 16, n=1Day 17, n=1Day 18, n=1Day 19, n=1Day 20, n=1Day 21, n=1Day 22, n=1Day 23, n=1Day 24, n=1Day 25, n=1Day 26, n=1Day 27, n=1Day 28, n=1
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV0.6700-0.51500.58621.28200.88401.14800.82701.11681.29851.20901.21350.85850.49851.40001.69001.18001.55001.85001.50001.90001.60001.25000.75001.05001.15001.45002.05002.00001.55001.4600

[back to top]

Number of Participants Having Infections

Number of participants having infections were summarized. (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV5

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of GSK1070806

Serial blood samples were collected to evaluate PK of GSK1070806 at Pre-operative, 0.75 hours, 4-8 hours, 24 hours, 168 hours, Day 30, Day 90, 6 months and 12 months after kidney reperfusion. Log-transformed geometric mean and 95% confidence interval have been presented. (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Pre-operative, 0.75 hours, 4-8 hours, 24 hours, 168 hours, Day 30, Day 90, 6 months and 12 months after kidney reperfusion

InterventionLog (nanograms per milliliter) (Geometric Mean)
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV36315.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Having Any Abnormality in Hematology Results of Potential Clinical Importance

Blood samples were collected to evaluate hematology parameters. Number of participants with abnormality in any hematology parameter results of potential clinical importance (high or low) observed at any time post Baseline are presented. PCI (high or low) was considered if hematocrit (high:>0.54;low:change from baseline [CFB] 0.075 decrease), hemoglobin (high:180; low: CFB 25 decrease), lymphocytes (low: 0.8), neutrophil count (low: 1.5), platelet count (low: 100; high: 550), White blood cells (low: 3; high:20). (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lymphocytes, LowHematocrit, HighWhite Blood Cells, HighWhite Blood Cells, LowPlatelet Count, LowTotal neutrophils, Low
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV711111

[back to top]

Number of Participants Having Any Abnormal Clinical Chemistry Results of Potential Clinical Importance

Blood samples were collected to evaluate clinical chemistry parameters. Number of participants with abnormal chemistry results of potential clinical importance (high or low) in any of these parameters at any time post Baseline visit have been presented. PCI (high or low) was considered if albumin (low<30), calcium (low<2, high>2.75), creatinine (high: CHB>44.2 increase), glucose (low<3, high>9), magnesium (low<0.5, high>1.23), phosphorus (low<0.8, high>1.6), potassium (low<3, high>5.5), sodium (low: 130, high>150), Total carbon dioxide (CO2) (low:18, high>32), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (high>=2*upper limit of normal [ULN]), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (high: >=2*ULN), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (high:>=2*ULN), Total bilirubin (high: >2*ULN), Total bilirubin+ALT (high: 1.5*ULN total bilirubin with >=2*ULN ALT). (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Albumin, LowCalcium, LowGlucose, HighPotassium, LowPotassium, HighTotal Bilirubin, HighSodium, LowALT, HighALP, HighAST, High
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV6751312111

[back to top]

Baseline and Change From Baseline in Serum Levels of Free, Total, and GSK1070806 Bound Interleukin 18 (IL-18) Over Time Post-transplant

IL-18 is itself rapidly secreted from intracellular stores following inflammasome mediated-activation. The appearance of IL-18 marks the initiation of the inflammatory response leading to further injury. Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to assess serum levels of free, total, and GSK1070806 bound IL-18. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment value. Change from Baseline was post Baseline value minus Baseline value. (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 0.75 hours, 4-8 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 30, Day 90, 6 months and 12 months post reperfusion

InterventionPicograms per milliliter (Mean)
Serum Free IL-18, Baseline (pre-operative), n=5Serum Free IL-18, Day 0, 0.75 hour, n=5Serum Free IL-18, Day 0, 4-8 hour, n=5Serum Free IL-18, Day 1, n=5Serum Free IL-18, Day 2, n=4Serum Free IL-18, Day 30, n=4Serum Free IL-18, Day 90, n=2Serum Bound IL-18, Baseline (pre-operative), n=5Serum Bound IL-18, Day 0, 0.75 hour, n=5Serum Bound IL-18, Day 0, 4-8 hour, n=5Serum Bound IL-18, Day 1, n=5Serum Bound IL-18, Day 2, n=4Serum Bound IL-18, Day 30, n=4Serum Bound IL-18, Day 90, n=2Serum Total IL-18, Baseline (pre-operative), n=7Serum Total IL-18, Day 0, 0.75 hour, n=6Serum Total IL-18, Day 0, 4-8 hour, n=6Serum Total IL-18, Day 1, n=6Serum Total IL-18, Day 2, n=5Serum Total IL-18, Day 30, n=6Serum Total IL-18, Day 90, n=7Serum Total IL-18, 6 months, n=7Serum Total IL-18, 12 months, n=6
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV26.840-22.620-22.540-23.890-5.263-27.925-2.25021.156362.084314.864472.204485.740617.543946.020130.6857572.3333576.3667636.5667660.66001175.50001423.54291303.71431091.0833

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From Time 0 to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-t]) and AUC From Time 0 to Infinite Time (AUC[0-inf]) of GSK1070806

Blood samples were collected to evaluate PK of GSK1070806 at Pre-operative, 0.75 hours, 4-8 hours, 24 hours, 168 hours, Day 30, Day 90, 6 months and 12 months after kidney reperfusion. Log-transformed geometric mean and 95% confidence interval have been presented. (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Pre-operative, 0.75 hours, 4-8 hours, 24 hours, 168 hours, Day 30, Day 90, 6 months and 12 months after kidney reperfusion

InterventionLog (Hour*nanograms per milliliter) (Geometric Mean)
AUC (0-t), n=7AUC (0-inf), n=6
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV26131338.241032450.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Episodes of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection

Number of participants with episodes of biopsy-proven acute rejection were evaluated to assess the effect of GSK1070806 on acute rejection risk, and rejection/Pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers. (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dialysis Events in the First 30 Days Post-transplant

Number of participants with dialysis events in the first 30 days post transplant was evaluated to assess the effect of GSK1070806 on dialysis dependency and graft survival. The AP Population is defined as participants having Baseline and at least one post-Baseline assessment. (NCT02723786)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
GSK1070806 3 mg/kg IV5

[back to top]

Amount of Treg Cells Observed in Peripheral Blood in Patients With and Without Rejection

flow cytometry immunophenotyping and gene expression microassays to assess amount of Treg cells and mRNA in peripheral blood in patients with and without rejection (after Tacc withdrwal) (NCT02736227)
Timeframe: Six months post transplantation

Interventionpercentage of CD4 positive cell (Mean)
Graft Rejection After Tacrolimus Was Discontinued (REJ)10
No Graft Rejection After Tacrolimus Weaning (Non REJ)5

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Success at Visit 4/Day 15

Percentage of subjects in each treatment group with treatment success, defined as a grade of clear or almost clear (a score of 0 or 1 on the IGA) within all treatment areas at the end of treatment on Visit 4/Day 15 (NCT02791308)
Timeframe: 15 days

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SuccessFailure
Elidel Cream, 1%7191
Pimecrolimus Cream, 1%62102
Vehicle Cream47109

[back to top] [back to top]

Probability of Platelet Recovery as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Have Recovered Platelet Counts

Probability of platelet recovery will be assessed by the number of participants who have recovered platelet counts at 1 year. (NCT02833805)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant20

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Chronic GVHD

Number of participants who experience chronic GVHD by two years after BMT. (NCT02833805)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Grades II-IV Acute GVHD

Number of participants who experience grade II, III, or IV acute GVHD by Day 100. (NCT02833805)
Timeframe: Day 100

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Grades III-IV Acute GVHD

Number of participants who experience grade III or IV acute GVHD by Day 100. (NCT02833805)
Timeframe: Day 100

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Primary Graft Failure

Number of participants who experience primary graft failure by one year after BMT. (NCT02833805)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant21

[back to top]

GVHD-free Relapse-free Survival (GRFS)

Number of participants alive, without relapse, and without GVHD at 1 year. (NCT02833805)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant19

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Secondary Graft Failure

Number of participants who experience secondary graft failure by one year after BMT. (NCT02833805)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant19

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Full Donor Chimerism

Number of participants with full donor chimerism at Day 60. (NCT02833805)
Timeframe: Day 60

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant21

[back to top]

Overall Survival and Engraftment at One Year

Number of enrolled participants who receive BMT, achieve engraftment, and are alive at one year post bone marrow transplant (BMT). (NCT02833805)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant19

[back to top]

Overall Survival at One Year

Number of participants alive at one year after BMT. (NCT02833805)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant19

[back to top]

Probability of Neutrophil Recovery as Assessed by the Number of Participants Who Have Recovered Neutrophil Counts

Probability of neutrophil recovery will be assessed by the number of participants who have recovered neutrophil counts at 1 year (>500 ANC). (NCT02833805)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bone Marrow Transplant21

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Infectious Episodes at 1 Year

Infectious episodes are defined as a positive test result for an infection. (NCT02866682)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cytomegalovirus infectionBK virus infectionOther infection
Brand Tacrolimus Only : Prograf10315
Generic A Only221634

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of Acute Rejection, Failure, Death

The definition of graft failure includes re-transplant and/or death and, in case of kidney transplant, also includes return to dialysis. Acute rejection was defined as biopsy-proven rejection according to Banff 2007 criteria. Please see the following article for details of the Banff '07 classification: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1600613522056428?via%3Dihub. (NCT02866682)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

Interventiondays (Mean)
Time to first graft failure
Brand Tacrolimus Only : Prograf86

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of Acute Rejection, Failure, Death

The definition of graft failure includes re-transplant and/or death and, in case of kidney transplant, also includes return to dialysis. Acute rejection was defined as biopsy-proven rejection according to Banff 2007 criteria. Please see the following article for details of the Banff '07 classification: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1600613522056428?via%3Dihub. (NCT02866682)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

Interventiondays (Mean)
Time to first of rejectionTime to first graft failureTime to first death
Generic A Only57.1200200

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Graft Rejection at 1 Year

Rejection was defined as biopsy-proven rejection according to Banff 2007 criteria. Please see the following article for details of the Banff '07 classification: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1600613522056428?via%3Dihub. (NCT02866682)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Brand Tacrolimus Only : Prograf0
Generic A Only9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Graft Failure at 1 Year

Graft failure as determined by return to dialysis, death, or re-transplant (NCT02866682)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Brand Tacrolimus Only : Prograf1
Generic A Only1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Adhered to Medication Regimen

"Patient adherence was assessed by their physician with participants marked as adherent, non-adherent, or unknown." (NCT02866682)
Timeframe: post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Brand Tacrolimus Only : Prograf37
Generic A Only105

[back to top]

Death or Loss-to-follow-up at 1 Year

(NCT02866682)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Brand Tacrolimus Only : Prograf0
Generic A Only5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Malignancy at 1 Year

Malignancy is defined as physician reported malignancy according to review of participants' medical history. (NCT02866682)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Brand Tacrolimus Only : Prograf0
Generic A Only1

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Incidence of Acute GVHD

Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD . Participants will be monitored for clinical signs of acute GVHD. Acute GVHD will be graded per the 1995 consensus guidelines. (NCT02891603)
Timeframe: up to 100 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pacritinib With Sirolimus and Tacrolimus at MTD46.4

[back to top]

STAT Activity

"STAT3 activity in circulating CD4+ T-cells. This is equivalent to 5.5 tablespoons of blood for each assessment. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) will be isolated by Ficoll density gradient. PBMCs will be stimulated with IL-6 for 20 minutes to activate STAT3. Phosphoproteins will be analyzed within T-cells by flow cytometry.~Result reported is %pSTAT3+CD4+T cells at day +21." (NCT02891603)
Timeframe: up to 21 days

Intervention%pSTAT3+CD4+T cells at day +21 (Mean)
Pacritinib With Sirolimus and Tacrolimus9.623

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Graft-Failure-Free Survival

Events for Graft-Failure-Free Survival (GFFS) including death, primary graft failure, secondary graft failure. The time to this event is the time from transplant to death from any cause, or graft failure, or last follow-up, or 1 year from transplant, whichever occurs first. For patients experiencing primary graft failure, Day 0.1 was used for primary graft failure event date to count the event in. The one-year GFFS probability and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and Greenwood's formula. (NCT02918292)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Haplo Bone Marrow HSCT77.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) is the primary endpoint of this study. The time to this event is the time from transplant to death from any cause or last follow-up or 1 year from transplant, whichever occurs first. The one-year OS probability and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and Greenwood's formula. (NCT02918292)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Haplo Bone Marrow HSCT80.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery

Neutrophil recovery is achieving an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 0.5 x10^9/L for three consecutive measurements on different days, with the first of the three days being defined as the day of neutrophil engraftment. The cumulative percentage of neutrophil engraftment was estimated with a 95% confidence interval using the Aalen-Johansen estimator with death prior to neutrophil engraftment treated as a competing risk. (NCT02918292)
Timeframe: Day 28 and 56

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 28Day 56
Haplo Bone Marrow HSCT93.593.5

[back to top]

Participants With Grade 3-5 Toxicities by SOC

Toxicities are evaluated for the study participants at Day 28, Day 56, Day 100, Day 180 and Day 365 post-transplant and graded using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Grade 3-5 toxicities are reported with higher grade indicating worse outcomes. Toxicities are summarized here by system organ class (SOC). A participant can report multiple toxicities, so the categories are not mutually exclusive for participants. (NCT02918292)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abnormal Liver SymptomsBlood and Lymphatic DisordersCardiovascular DisordersChemistry/InvestigationsGI DisordersGeneral DisordersHemorrhagic DisordersHepatic DisordersImmune System DisordersMetabolism and Nutrition DisordersMusculoskeletal and Connective Tissue DisordersNervous System DisordersRenal DisordersRespiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal DisordersTotal (any of above SOC)
Haplo Bone Marrow HSCT711521053617145823

[back to top]

Immune Reconstitution of Quantitative Immunoglobulins

Quantitative immunoglobulins of IgA, IgG, IgM were done at baseline and 1-year post-transplant. (NCT02918292)
Timeframe: baseline and 1-year

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
IgA at BaselineIgA at 1 YearIgG at BaselineIgG at 1 YearIgM at BaselineIgM at 1 Year
Haplo Bone Marrow HSCT172.3111.6987.51004102.896

[back to top]

Immune Reconstitution of Flow Cytometry

Quantitative assessments of peripheral blood CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, and CD56 positive lymphocytes will be done through flow cytometric analysis. (NCT02918292)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 100, 180, and 365

Interventioncells/uL (Mean)
CD3 at BaselineCD3 at Day 100CD3 at 6 MonthsCD3 at 1 YearCD4 at BaselineCD4 at Day 100CD4 at 6 MonthsCD4 at 1 YearCD8 at BaselineCD8 at Day 100CD8 at 6 MonthsCD8 at 1 YearCD19 at BaselineCD19 at Day 100CD19 at 6 MonthsCD19 at 1 YearCD56 at BaselineCD56 at Day 100CD56 at 6 MonthsCD56 at 1 Year
Haplo Bone Marrow HSCT862550.8640.51121434.1122.3172.6472.7326.9272.9333.3569.7106.2221.1204.8264.6124.6237.6260.3293.2

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Frequencies of Infections Categorized by Infection Type

The number of systemic infections is reported. Infections are categorized by infection type. A participant can report multiple types of infections, so the categories are not mutually exclusive for participants. All grade 2 and grade 3 infections, as defined by the BMT CTN Technical MOP, occurring post transplantation were reported on the study. (NCT02918292)
Timeframe: 1 Year

Interventioninfections (Number)
Bacterial infectionViral infectionFungal infectionProtozoal infectionOther infection
Haplo Bone Marrow HSCT2632303

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) or Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease (PTLD)

CMV viremia and disease, EBV viremia, and PTLD are monitored and reported per protocol. The cumulative percentage of each outcome was estimated with a 95% confidence interval using the Aalen-Johansen estimator with death prior to event treated as a competing risk. (NCT02918292)
Timeframe: 1 Year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cumulative Percentage of Participants with EBVCumulative Percentage of Participants with CMVCumulative Percentage of Participants with PTLD
Haplo Bone Marrow HSCT9.722.66.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Secondary Graft Failure

"Secondary graft failure is defined as any one of the following:~Initial neutrophil engraftment (ANC greater than or equal to 0.5 x10^9/L measured for three consecutive measurements on different days) followed by sustained subsequent decline in ANC to less than 0.5 x 10^9/L for three consecutive measurements on different days;~Initial whole blood or marrow donor chimerism greater than or equal to 5%, but then declining to less than 5% on subsequent measurements;~Second infusion/transplant given after Day 56 for graft failure." (NCT02918292)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Haplo Bone Marrow HSCT3.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Primary Graft Failure

Primary graft failure is defined by the lack of neutrophil engraftment by Day 56 post-HSCT or failure to achieve at least 5% donor chimerism (whole blood or marrow) on any measurements up to and including Day +56. For this protocol, lineage-specific, myeloid, and T cell chimerisms are required. Myeloid engraftment might not proceed at the same rate as T cell engraftment. If myeloid has greater than or equal to 5% donor, even if T cell compartment does not, this is not considered primary graft failure. Secondary graft failure is defined by initial neutrophil engraftment (ANC greater than or equal to 0.5 x 10^8/L measured for 3 consecutive measurements on different days) followed by sustained subsequent decline in ANC to less than 0.5 x 10^9/L for three consecutive measurements on different days or initial whole blood or marrow donor chimerism greater than or equal to 5%, but then declining to less than 5% on subsequent measurements or second infusion/transplant given for graft failure. (NCT02918292)
Timeframe: Day 56

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Haplo Bone Marrow HSCT12.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery

Platelet recovery is defined by achieving a platelet count > 20 x 10^9/L with no platelet transfusions in the preceding seven days. The first day of the sustained platelet count will be defined as the day of platelet engraftment. The cumulative percentage of platelet engraftment was estimated with a 95% confidence interval using the Aalen-Johansen estimator with death prior to platelet engraftment treated as a competing risk. (NCT02918292)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Haplo Bone Marrow HSCT77.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Acute Graft-vs-host-disease (GVHD)

Acute GVHD is graded by consensus grading (Przepiorka 1995) per BMTCTN manual of procedures (MOP). Acute GVHD is graded by consensus grading (Przepiorka 1995) per BMTCTN manual of procedures (MOP). The time of onset of grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute GVHD were recorded. This endpoint is evaluated through 100 days post-transplant. Cumulative percentage of acute GVHD post-transplant are estimated using the cumulative incidence function, treating death prior to acute GVHD as the competing risk. (NCT02918292)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Haplo Bone Marrow HSCT16.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD

The event for this secondary endpoint is any chronic GVHD based on 2014 NIH Consensus Criteria. This includes mild, moderate and severe chronic GVHD. The analyses of Chronic GVHD use the site-reported data. The cumulative percentage of chronic GVHD is computed using the cumulative incidence function, treating death prior to chronic GVHD as a competing risk. Eight organs will be scored on a 0-3 scale to reflect degree of chronic GVHD involvement. Liver and pulmonary function test results and use of systemic therapy for treatment of chronic GVHD will also be recorded. This secondary endpoint of chronic GVHD will include mild, moderate and severe chronic GVHD based on NIH Consensus Criteria. (NCT02918292)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Haplo Bone Marrow HSCT25.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (rFSGS) or Death or Graft Loss or Lost to Follow-up Through 3 Months Post Transplant

rFSGS was defined as nephrotic range proteinuria with a protein/creatinine ratio (≥ 3.0 g/g). Death, graft loss or lost to follow-up was imputed as rFSGS. (NCT02921789)
Timeframe: At 3 Months post transplant

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
SOC Regimen31.3
Bleselumab Regimen18.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven rFSGS Through 3, 6 and 12 Months Post-Transplant

Percentage of participants with biopsy-proven rFSGS determined by a blinded central review of images from electron microscopy (EM) and slides for light microscopy (LM) by an independent pathologist. (NCT02921789)
Timeframe: At 3, 6 and 12 Months post transplant

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6Month 12
Bleselumab Regimen31.830.429.2
SOC Regimen35.736.736.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) Through 3, 6, and 12 Months Post Transplant

All episodes of kidney dysfunction based on clinical signs and symptoms were evaluated for possible BPAR. BPAR was confirmed if participants Banff criteria >=1. (NCT02921789)
Timeframe: At 3, 6 and 12 Months post transplant

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6Month 12
Bleselumab Regimen26.926.929.2
SOC Regimen20.020.024.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With rFSGS or Death or Graft Loss or Lost to Follow-up Through 6 and 12 Months Post Transplant

rFSGS was defined as nephrotic range proteinuria with a protein/creatinine ratio (≥ 3.0 g/g). Death, graft loss or lost to follow-up was imputed as rFSGS. (NCT02921789)
Timeframe: At 6 and 12 Months post transplant

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6Month 12
Bleselumab Regimen18.523.1
SOC Regimen31.335.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure Through 12 Months Post Transplant

Efficacy failure was defined as BPAR, death, graft loss or lost to follow-up through 12 months post transplant. (NCT02921789)
Timeframe: 12 Months post transplant

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
SOC Regimen32.3
Bleselumab Regimen32.0

[back to top]

Dose Modifications

Number of dose modifications from baseline to 3 months post-conversion. (NCT02953873)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 months post conversion

Interventionnumber of dose modifications (Median)
Homozygous CYP3A5 1 expressorsHeterozygous CYP3A5 1 expressorsCYP3A5 1 non expressers
Conversion Arm124

[back to top]

Total Daily Dose

Difference in Total Daily Dose necessary for steady state therapeutic goal (NCT02953873)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 months post conversion

Interventionmg (Median)
Pre-Conversion Tacrolimus DosePost-Conversion Tacrolimus Dose
Conversion Arm1015

[back to top]

Number of Days to Reach Therapeutic Trough Goal

Days to reach therapeutic goal after conversion (NCT02953873)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 months post conversion

Interventionnumber of days (Median)
Homozygous CYP3A5 1 expressorsHeterozygous CYP3A5 1 expressorsCYP3A5 1 non-expressors
Conversion Arm151015

[back to top]

Dose-normalized Trough

Difference in dose-normalized trough at steady state before and after conversion from tacrolimus IR to Astagraf XL® (NCT02953873)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 months post-conversion

Interventionng/dL (Median)
Pre-Conversion Dose TroughPost-Conversion Dose Trough
Conversion Arm0.590.44

[back to top]

Weight-Based Dose Requirement

Weight-based dose requirements to reach therapeutic goal pre- and post-conversion (NCT02953873)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 months post conversion

Interventionmg/kg (Median)
Pre-ConversionPost-Conversion
Conversion Arm0.110.16

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Experiencing Acute Allograft Rejection

Estimate the composite of treatment failure rate, defined as acute allograft rejection with a Banff grade 1A or higher, graft loss, or death at six months post-conversion, in patients converted to a once-daily immunosuppressant regimen of Envarsus®, everolimus, and prednisone versus patients converted to a twice-daily regimen of Envarsus®, MMF, and prednisone. (NCT02954198)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months post conversion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Control: Envarsus + MMF0
Intervention: Envarsus + Everoliumus0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Who Experienced Kidney Transplant Graft Loss

Measure and compare time-to-event analysis between the two arms graft loss (time to event analysis) (NCT02954198)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months post conversion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Control: Envarsus + MMF0
Intervention: Envarsus + Everoliumus0

[back to top]

Self-reported Medication Adherence From Baseline to 6 Months.

Percent of subjects reporting high medication adherence at baseline compared to 6 months post-conversion, using the Morisky Medication Adherence scale (MMAS). The MMAS rates medication adherence on a scale of 0 to 8. 0 is high adherence, 1-2 is medium adherence, and greater than or equal to 3 is low adherence. (NCT02954198)
Timeframe: 6 months post conversion

,
Intervention% of participants (Number)
Baseline6 months post-conversion
Control: Envarsus + MMF8059
Intervention: Envarsus + Everoliumus4547

[back to top]

Subject Specific Change on Medication Side Effect Scale

Examine subject specific change on a validated Medication Side Effect Scale at the time of the conversion versus six months post-conversion, compared between the two arms. Side effect burden scale is from 0 to 180. A lower score is less side effect burden, a higher score is more side effect burden. (NCT02954198)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months post conversion

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline6 month post-conversion
Control: Envarsus + MMF7193
Intervention: Envarsus + Everoliumus3738

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Chronic Renal Impairment by eGFR Category

Renal function will be assessed using estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). Creatinine clearance (CrCl) may also be calculated as a reference. Patients will be categorized as having either mild (eGFR of 60 mL/min/1.73m^2 to 89 mL/min/1.73m^2), moderate (eGFR of 30 mL/min/1.73m^2 to 59 mL/min/1.73m^2), or severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m^2). (NCT03020589)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Mild : Week 1Mild : Month12Moderate : Week 1Moderate : Month12Severe : Week 1Severe : Month12
Control24464251353
CYP3A5 Based Tacrolimus Dosing235335334313

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Outcomes

Number of adverse outcomes (i.e., graft loss, infection, and death) (NCT03020589)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
Interventionadverse outcomes (Number)
Graft lossInfectionDeath
Control2170
CYP3A5 Based Tacrolimus Dosing1121

[back to top]

Tacrolimus Level

Time to achieve tacrolimus therapeutic range at 0 to 4 months (8-10 ng/mL) (NCT03020589)
Timeframe: 4 months

InterventionDays (Mean)
CYP3A5 Based Tacrolimus Dosing6.4
Control7.87

[back to top]

Mean Number of Dose Adjustments and/or Drug Alterations

Mean number of dose adjustments and/or drug alteration or addition due to insufficient immunosuppression. (NCT03020589)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionAdjustments (Mean)
CYP3A5 Based Tacrolimus Dosing7.86
Control7.37

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Reaching Target Tacrolimus Levels (8-10 ng/mL) on Day 7 After Kidney Transplantation

(NCT03020589)
Timeframe: Day 7 after transplantation

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
CYP3A5 Based Tacrolimus Dosing0.29
Control0.21

[back to top]

Number of Events of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)

The number of events of BPAR within the first 3 months (Days 0 through 90), 91-180, and 181-365 days after transplantation (NCT03020589)
Timeframe: first 3 months (Days 0 through 90), 91-180, and 181-365 days after transplantation

,
InterventionBPAR events (Number)
Days 0 through 90Days 91-180Days 181-365
Control200
CYP3A5 Based Tacrolimus Dosing330

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Reaching Target Tacrolimus Levels (8-10 ng/mL) on Day 3 After Kidney Transplantation

(NCT03020589)
Timeframe: Day 3 after transplantation

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
CYP3A5 Based Tacrolimus Dosing0.2
Control0.14

[back to top]

Time to Engraftment

Number of days from transplant when participants achieved engraftment measure by ANC of 0.5 for three consecutive days. (NCT03096782)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months after transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Twenty Two DaysTwenty Nine DaysThirty DaysNine DaysThirty Two Days
Chemotherapy Plus Cord Blood Transplant21111

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival

Number of participants that were in remission post transplant. (NCT03096782)
Timeframe: Up to12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete Remission at 30 daysComplete Remission at 12 months
Chemotherapy Plus Cord Blood Transplant64

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Number of participants alive 1 year post transplant. (NCT03096782)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months after transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Chemotherapy Plus Cord Blood Transplant4

[back to top]

Proportion of Modified Intent to Treat Subjects With Success on Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (Success Being a Score of Clear [0] or Almost Clear [1])

Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Severity Scale: Clear (0) Minor residual discoloration, no erythema or induration/papulation, no oozing/crusting; Almost Clear (1) Trace faint pink erythema with almost no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting; Mild disease (1) Faint pink erythema with mild induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting; Moderate disease (3) Pink-red erythema with moderate induration/papulation and there may be some oozing/crusting; Severe disease (4) Deep/bright red erythema with severe induration/papulation with oozing/crusting (NCT03107611)
Timeframe: Day 15

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Test108
Reference Standard115
Placebo98

[back to top]

Proportion of Per Protocol Subjects With Success on Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (Success Being a Score of Clear [0] or Almost Clear [1])

Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Severity Scale: Clear (0) Minor residual discoloration, no erythema or induration/papulation, no oozing/crusting; Almost Clear (1) Trace faint pink erythema with almost no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting; Mild disease (1) Faint pink erythema with mild induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting; Moderate disease (3) Pink-red erythema with moderate induration/papulation and there may be some oozing/crusting; Severe disease (4) Deep/bright red erythema with severe induration/papulation with oozing/crusting (NCT03107611)
Timeframe: Day 15

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Test105
Reference Standard113
Placebo95

[back to top]

Change in Severity of Four Individual Signs and Symptoms

Erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification and pruritus (NCT03107611)
Timeframe: Day 15

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Erythema - Head & Neck72266832Erythema - Head & Neck72266833Erythema - Head & Neck72266834Erythema - Trunk72266832Erythema - Trunk72266833Erythema - Trunk72266834Erythema - Upper Limbs72266834Erythema - Upper Limbs72266832Erythema - Upper Limbs72266833Erythema - Lower Limbs72266832Erythema - Lower Limbs72266833Erythema - Lower Limbs72266834Induration/Papulation - Head & Neck72266832Induration/Papulation - Head & Neck72266833Induration/Papulation - Head & Neck72266834Induration/Papulation - Trunk72266834Induration/Papulation - Trunk72266832Induration/Papulation - Trunk72266833Induration/Papulation - Upper Limbs72266832Induration/Papulation - Upper Limbs72266833Induration/Papulation - Upper Limbs72266834Induration/Papulation - Lower Limbs72266834Induration/Papulation - Lower Limbs72266832Induration/Papulation - Lower Limbs72266833Lichenification - Head & Neck72266832Lichenification - Head & Neck72266833Lichenification - Head & Neck72266834Lichenification - Trunk72266834Lichenification - Trunk72266832Lichenification - Trunk72266833Lichenification - Upper Limbs72266834Lichenification - Upper Limbs72266832Lichenification - Upper Limbs72266833Lichenification - Lower Limbs72266832Lichenification - Lower Limbs72266833Lichenification - Lower Limbs72266834Pruritus72266832Pruritus72266833Pruritus72266834
3 = Worsen by 32 = Worsen by 21 = Worsen by 10 = No change-1 = Improve by 1-2 = Improve by 2-3 = Improve by 3
Test121
Reference Standard118
Test51
Placebo48
Placebo15
Test3
Test106
Test56
Placebo50
Test35
Reference Standard30
Placebo30
Reference Standard80
Placebo85
Reference Standard91
Placebo76
Test49
Placebo33
Placebo4
Test101
Reference Standard109
Placebo106
Test64
Reference Standard62
Placebo61
Test34
Placebo3
Test118
Reference Standard117
Placebo135
Placebo51
Test22
Placebo14
Reference Standard4
Placebo5
Test103
Reference Standard110
Placebo108
Test62
Reference Standard57
Placebo55
Test31
Reference Standard33
Placebo34
Placebo6
Test75
Reference Standard79
Placebo88
Test83
Placebo81
Test39
Reference Standard35
Placebo26
Test100
Reference Standard100
Placebo116
Test71
Reference Standard81
Placebo57
Reference Standard21
Placebo23
Test1
Placebo1
Test5
Placebo2
Test131
Reference Standard137
Placebo151
Test47
Placebo42
Test17
Reference Standard20
Placebo7
Placebo0
Test114
Reference Standard126
Placebo127
Test59
Reference Standard50
Test24
Reference Standard23
Placebo17
Reference Standard0
Reference Standard2
Test7
Reference Standard6
Placebo12
Test93
Reference Standard93
Placebo98
Test72
Reference Standard83
Placebo65
Test29
Reference Standard18
Reference Standard3
Test6
Test126
Reference Standard113
Placebo126
Test54
Placebo52
Test13
Reference Standard16
Placebo18
Test0
Test2
Reference Standard1
Reference Standard5
Placebo10
Test42
Reference Standard41
Placebo59
Test76
Reference Standard78
Placebo82
Test73
Reference Standard71
Placebo49
Test4
Reference Standard8

[back to top]

Evaluation of Application Site Reactions

Dryness, burning/stinging, erosion, edema, and pain (NCT03107611)
Timeframe: Day 15

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dryness72266832Dryness72266833Dryness72266834Stinging/Burning72266833Stinging/Burning72266834Stinging/Burning72266832Erosion72266832Erosion72266833Erosion72266834Edema72266834Edema72266833Edema72266832Pain72266832Pain72266833Pain72266834
MildModerateSevereNone
Test121
Reference Standard126
Placebo103
Test64
Reference Standard63
Placebo76
Test23
Reference Standard21
Placebo33
Test6
Reference Standard3
Placebo5
Test180
Reference Standard171
Placebo172
Reference Standard30
Placebo28
Test11
Reference Standard11
Placebo14
Reference Standard1
Placebo3
Test190
Reference Standard187
Placebo190
Reference Standard19
Placebo18
Test8
Reference Standard7
Placebo9
Test2
Test196
Reference Standard194
Placebo193
Test14
Reference Standard13
Placebo17
Test4
Reference Standard6
Placebo7
Test0
Reference Standard0
Placebo0
Test192
Reference Standard195
Placebo197
Test18
Reference Standard16
Placebo12
Reference Standard2
Placebo1

[back to top]

Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (aGVHD) of Grades 2-4 According to the Consensus Grading

Acute graft versus host disease is graded according to the 1994 Keystone Consensus Grading. aGVHD grade was evaluated from day 0 through 100 days post-transplant. The first day of acute GVHD onset at grades 2-4 was used to calculate the cumulative incidence. Relapse/death prior to onset was considered competing events. (NCT03128359)
Timeframe: Up to 100 days post-stem cell infusion

Interventionpercentage of probability (Number)
Regimen A (Fludarabine, Melphalan, PBSC HCT, GVHD Prophylaxis)47
Regimen C (Fludarabine, TBI, PBSC HCT, GVHD Prophylaxis)53

[back to top]

Graft-Versus-Host Disease-Free, Relapse-Free Survival (GRFS) at 1 Year

Estimates will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, Greenwood formula will be used to calculate standard error (SE), and log-log transformation method will be used to construct 95% confidence intervals. Graft versus host disease (GVHD, acute and chronic), disease status and vital status will be monitored per clinical standard operating procedure. For this endpoint failure is defined as the first occurrence of grade 3 or 4 acute GVHD, or moderate/severe chronic GVHD, or disease relapse (for patients in complete remission at the start of conditioning) or disease progression (for patients with active disease at the start of conditioning) or death (from any cause). Patients not experiencing any of these will be censored at his/her date of last contact. (NCT03128359)
Timeframe: From stem cell infusion to grade 3-4 acute graft versus host disease (GVHD), moderate-severe chronic GVHD, relapse, progression or death (from any cause), whichever occurs first, assessed for up to 1 year.

Interventionpercentage of survival probability (Number)
Regimen A (Fludarabine, Melphalan, PBSC HCT, GVHD Prophylaxis)53
Regimen C (Fludarabine, TBI, PBSC HCT, GVHD Prophylaxis)84

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) at 1 Year

Estimates was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, Greenwood formula was used to calculate SE, and log-log transformation method was used to construct 95% confidence intervals. Each patient's vital status was monitored per clinical standard operating procedure. For this endpoint failure is defined as death (from any cause). Patients not experiencing a death event was censored at his/her date of last contact. (NCT03128359)
Timeframe: From start of transplant to death, or last follow up, whichever occurs first, assessed for up to 1 year.

Interventionpercentage of probability (Number)
Regimen A (Fludarabine, Melphalan, PBSC HCT, GVHD Prophylaxis)68
Regimen C (Fludarabine, TBI, PBSC HCT, GVHD Prophylaxis)100

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Experiencing an Improvement in Their Nosebleeds

Efficacy of tacrolimus nasal ointment on nosebleeds when administered for 6 weeks (NCT03152019)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Protopic® 0.1% (Tacrolimus) Ointment10
Placebo Ointment9

[back to top]

Tolerability as Defined by the Number of Subjects Discontinuing the Study Medication

To observe the tolerability as defined by the number of subjects discontinuing the study medication. (NCT03194321)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tacrolimus Extended-Release Arm3

[back to top] [back to top]

Change in Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA) as Defined by the DSA Relative Intensity Score (RIS)

To observe the change in DSA as defined by the DSA RIS, which is defined by: 0 points for no DSA, 2 points for each weak DSA (MFI <5,000), 5 points for each moderate DSA (MFI 5,000 -10,000), and 10 points for each strong DSA (MFI >10,000). (NCT03194321)
Timeframe: Transplant, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

InterventionDSA Relative Intensity Score (Mean)
DSA RIS @ TransplantDSA RIS @ Month 1DSA RIS @ Month 3DSA RIS @ Month 6DSA RIS @ Month 9DSA RIS @ Month 12
Tacrolimus Extended-Release Arm3.210.790.640.930.861.14

[back to top]

Change in Quality of Life

The Investigators will evaluate the quality of life between baseline and 6 months related to sleep disturbance and upper extremity fine motor skills/ADL (activities of daily living), with the goal to be an improvement in their quality of life. This was assessed via a study-specific clinical assessment that evaluated patient reports of hand tremor and related complaints, and scored in a range of 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms of hand tremor, and a lower QOL. (NCT03270462)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 Month, 6 Months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineMonth 1Month 6
Envarsus XR2.71.350.2

[back to top]

Kidney Function: Serum Creatinine Levels

The Investigators will evaluate serum creatinine levels and will document any adverse events associated with this measure. (NCT03270462)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 Month, 6 Months

Interventionmg/dl (Geometric Mean)
BaselineMonth 1Month 6
Envarsus XR1.191.141.11

[back to top]

Therapeutic Tacrolimus Drug Levels

The Investigators will evaluate Tacrolimus drug levels and will document any adverse events associated with this measure. (NCT03270462)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 Month, 6 Months

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
BaselineMonth 1Month 6
Envarsus XR8.668.588.48

[back to top]

Change in Kidney Transplant Function From 2 Weeks Post Transplant Through 12 Months Post Transplant

change in the mean eGFR from the baseline (2 weeks post transplant), 3 months (post transplant) , and 12 months (post transplant). (NCT03289650)
Timeframe: 2 weeks post transplant through 12 months post transplant

InterventionmL/min/1.73m^2 (Mean)
Group 1: Control Arm: Standard of Care (SOC) Tacrolimus2.03
Group 2: Interventional Arm: Study Related Drug: LCP-Tacrolimus/Envarsus XR (LCP-Tacro/Envarsus XR)-2.19

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Acute Rejection at 3 Months and 12 Months Post-Transplant

Acute rejection of kidney transplant is determined via biopsy. (NCT03289650)
Timeframe: Measured at 3 months post transplant, 12 months post transplant

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Acute rejection at 3 monthsAcute rejection at 12 months
Group 1: Control Arm: Standard of Care (SOC) Tacrolimus00
Group 2: Interventional Arm: Study Related Drug: LCP-Tacrolimus/Envarsus® XR (LCP-Tacro/Envarsus XR)12

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change in Allograft Immunohistopathology Profile

"Tissue analysis via immunohistopathological staining and microscopic examination Moderate acute tubular necrosis => presence of focal coagulative necrosis or infarction on histopathologic examination~Arteriolar hyalinosis grade 2 means: Replacement of degenerated smooth muscle cells by hyaline deposits in more than 1 arteriole, without circumferential involvement~Global glomerulosclerosis >grade 2, means glomerulosclerosis affecting more than 50% of glomeruli in the biopsy sample~IFTA : Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy: Inflammation in 26% to 50% of scarred cortical parenchyma" (NCT03289650)
Timeframe: Measured at 3 months post transplant, 12 months post transplant

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Acute tubular necrosis > moderate >=2Arteriolar Hyalinosis >= grade 2isometric vacuolization of tubulesArteriolar myocyte vacuolizationThrombotic microangiopathyGlobal glomerulosclerosis >grade 2IFTA > grade 2
Group 1: Control Arm: Standard of Care (SOC) Tacrolimus2200111
Group 2: Interventional Arm: Study Related Drug: LCP-Tacrolimus/Envarsus XR (LCP-Tacro/Envarsus XR)2210122

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Deceased at at 3 Months and 12 Months Post-Transplant

Subject survival status is continually monitored via routine follow-up visits. (NCT03289650)
Timeframe: Through 12 months post transplant

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Subject Death at 3 monthsSubject Death at 12 months
Group 1: Control Arm: Standard of Care (SOC) Tacrolimus00
Group 2: Interventional Arm: Study Related Drug: LCP-Tacrolimus/Envarsus® XR (LCP-Tacro/Envarsus XR)00

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Graft Loss at 3 Months and 12 Months Post-Transplant

Graft loss is determined via biopsy. (NCT03289650)
Timeframe: Measured at 3 months post transplant, 12 months post transplant

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Graft Loss at 3 monthsGraft loss at 12 months
Group 1: Control Arm: Standard of Care (SOC) Tacrolimus00
Group 2: Interventional Arm: Study Related Drug: LCP-Tacrolimus/Envarsus XR (LCP-Tacro/Envarsus XR)00

[back to top]

Donor-specific HLA Antibodies, Re-transplantation, or Death

The Outcome Measure is a composite primary endpoint of the development of donor-specific HLA antibodies, re-transplantation, or death. Testing for donor-specifc HLA antibodies was performed at study-specified time points using the single antigen bead assay at the study core lab. Donor-specific HLA antibodies were defined as reactivity with a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ≥ 2,000. (NCT03388008)
Timeframe: 365 days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
DeathDonor-specific HLA antibodiesRe-transplantation
Belatacept-based Immunosuppression530
Standard of Care030

[back to top]

Change in Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)

During The Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), participants are asked to make verbal associations to different letters of the alphabet by saying all the words which they can think of beginning with a given letter. Three letters of progressively increasing associative difficulty are presented with 60 seconds allotted per letter for word retrieval. Scores are calculated as a sum of the total words produced across the 3 letter trials. The lowest possible score is zero, meaning no words could be produced. There is no limit to the higher end of the scale given that participants can produce as many words as possible for each of the three letters. Higher scores indicate greater word retrieval and better cognitive function. Outcome is reported as the change in COWAT between baseline and 6 weeks, baseline and 12 weeks, and baseline and 24 weeks. (NCT03437577)
Timeframe: Change from baseline at 6,12, 24 weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline to 6 weeksBaseline to 12 weeksBasline to 24 weeks
Extended-Release Tacrolimus-2.11-1.78-0.44
Immediate-Release Tacrolimus.44-0.880.78

[back to top]

Tacrolimus Target Trough Level Maintenance

Percentage of Days Far (> 2 ng/mL) Out of Range of Tacrolimus Target Trough Level (NCT03527238)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Standard of Care38.4
Phenotypic Precision Medicine (PPM)24.2

[back to top]

Drug Concentrations in Blood Samples at Individual Time-points

The concentrations of tacrolimus in blood samples were measured at baseline, day 1 (1 hr, 3 hrs, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, and 24 hrs), followed by days 3, 7, 14, 21, 30, 37, 44, 51 and 60. (NCT03626714)
Timeframe: 60 days

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
BaselineDay 1, hour 1Day 1, hour 3Day 1 hour 6Day 1, hour 12Day 1, hour 24Day 3Day 7Day 14Day 21Day 30Day 37Day 44Day 51Day 60
Experimental: Sustained Release Injectable Tacrolimus00.6670.9561.301.841.541.240.7750.3410.3200.3020.2820.2600.2690.260

[back to top] [back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half-life [t1/2]

The apparent terminal elimination half-life was calculated. (NCT03626714)
Timeframe: 60 days

Interventionhours (Mean)
Experimental: Sustained Release Injectable Tacrolimus1100

[back to top]

Blood Concentration-time Curve [AUC]

Area under the concentration-time curve (NCT03626714)
Timeframe: 60 days

Interventionhour*ng/mL (Mean)
Experimental: Sustained Release Injectable Tacrolimus568

[back to top]

Mean Blood Concentration-time Curve - Cmax

Maximum observed tacrolimus whole blood concentration (NCT03626714)
Timeframe: 60 days

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Experimental: Sustained Release Injectable Tacrolimus1.92

[back to top]

Mean Blood Concentration-time Curve - Tmax

Time to maximum observed tacrolimus whole blood concentration (NCT03626714)
Timeframe: 60 days

InterventionHour (Mean)
Experimental: Sustained Release Injectable Tacrolimus14.3

[back to top]

Mean Change in Family Dermatology Life Quality Index

The FDLQI is a 10-item questionnaire designed for adult family members of a patient with a skin disease. It measures the impact of the patient's skin disease on the family member's quality of life. The caregiver will answer each question using a 4-point scale: Not at all = 0, A Little = 1, Quite A Lot = 2, Very Much = 3. The scores from each item are summed to create a severity burden score (i.e., minimum score = 0; maximum score = 30). Higher scores indicate worse quality of life. The scores represent degree of severity burden on quality of life: No effect = 0-1; Small effect = 2-6; Moderate effect = 7-12; Very large effect = 13-18; and Extremely large effect = 19-30. This measure will be completed electronically on an iPad using REDCap. (NCT03645057)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Crisaborole-2.6
Tacrolimus 0.03%-3.6

[back to top]

Mean Change in Children's PROMIS Pediatric Itch Short-Form

This is a patient-reported outcome measure for Itch in pediatric patients that consists of 8 fixed items items, spanning four domains (general, activity, mood/sleep, and scratching behavior). Each item is scored on using 1 = No Itch, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, 4 = Severe, and 5 = Very Severe. The range of the scale is 1 to 5 with higher numbers indicating worse outcome. A total score, representing overall itch-related quality of life, is scored by taking the average (i.e., divide by 8) of the sum of all 8 items. Therefore, total itch scores range between 1 and 5, with higher scores indicating worse impact of itch on quality of life. The measure was completed electronically on an iPad using REDCap. (NCT03645057)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Crisaborole-0.3
Tacrolimus 0.03%-0.4

[back to top]

Mean Change in Children's Eczema Area & Severity Index (EASI)

Clinician rated the severity of atopic dermatitis using the EASI. The EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of AD. It does not include a grade for dryness or scaling and includes only inflamed areas. The area score is a 7-point scale representing the percentage of skin affected by AD for each body region. The severity score is recorded for each of the four regions of the body and is the sum of the intensity scores for four signs. The four signs include redness, thickness, scratching, and lichenification. The intensity scores are performed using a 4-pont scale. The final EASI score is the sum of the total scores for each region. Add up the total scores for each region to determine the final EASI score. The minimum EASI score is 0 and the maximum EASI score is 72. Higher scores represent worse AD severity. (NCT03645057)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Crisaborole-2.4
Tacrolimus 0.03%-1.9

[back to top]

Mean Change in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index

This patient-reported outcome measure will be completed using an iPad. The 10-item questionnaire designed for use in parents of children (i.e., ages 4-17) to obtain information on children's quality of life. Each question relates to a component of quality of life: Symptoms/Feelings (items 1-2); Leisure (items 4-6); School (item 7); Relationships (items 3-8); Sleep (item 9), and Treatment (item 10). Children answer each question using a 4-point scale: Not at all = 0, A Little = 1, Quite A Lot = 2, Very Much = 3. The scores from each item are summed to create a severity burden score (i.e., minimum score = 0; maximum score = 30). Higher the scores, the greater burden on quality of life. The scores represent degree of severity burden on quality of life: No effect = 0-1; Small effect = 2-6; Moderate effect = 7-12; Very large effect = 13-18; and Extremely large effect = 19-30. (NCT03645057)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Crisaborole-1.1
Tacrolimus 0.03%-3.6

[back to top]

Mean Change in Caregiver Burden Inventory

"The CBI is a 24-item, five-subscale Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI) and demonstrates its use as a diagnostic tool for caregiver burden. The five subscales include: Time Dependency, Development, Physical Health, Emotional Health, and Social Relationships. Each subscale contains 4-5 items which are statements of feelings. Caregivers use a 5-point scale, anchored by 0 = Never and 4 = Nearly Always, to show how often the statement describes his/her feelings. Overall scores can range from 0 (minimum) to 96 (maximum), where a score near or above 36 indicates significant burden. Higher scores indicate greater caregiver burden (i.e., worse outcome). All subscales have a maximum score of 20, except Physical Health which has a maximum score of 16. Subscale scores and item scores help identify the underlying cause of caregiver burden. This measure will be completed electronically on an iPad using REDCap." (NCT03645057)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Crisaborole-1.3
Tacrolimus 0.03%-4.2

[back to top]

Mean Change in PROMIS Anxiety-children (Adaptive Test)

"This patient-reported outcome measure will be completed by the child patient electronically on an iPad using computer adaptive test (CAT). The CAT consists of 4-12 questions on feelings related to anxiety. The number of questions a patient answers depends on how he or she answers each question. The domain score is a t-score ranging from 0 to 100 with a score of 50 representing the average score for the general population. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety. A score above 55 is considered clinically significant for each domain. A score change of 5 or more is considered a clinically important change in domain severity. This PRO was completed electronically on an iPad using REDCap." (NCT03645057)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Crisaborole-5.0
Tacrolimus 0.03%-6.8

[back to top]

Mean Change in PROMIS Pain Interference-Children (Adaptive Test)

"This is a patient reported outcome measure for pain interference in pediatric patients. This is a computer adaptive test consisting of 4-12 questions related to how pain interferes with daily activities. The number of questions a patient answers depends on how he or she answers each question. The overall domain score ranges from 0 to100 with a score of 50 representing the average score for the general population. Higher scores indicate greater pain interference. A score above 55 is considered clinically significant for each domain. A score change of 5 or more is considered a clinically important change in domain severity. This measure was completed electronically on an iPad using REDCap." (NCT03645057)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Crisaborole-6.4
Tacrolimus 0.03%-6.8

[back to top]

Mean Change in PROMIS Depressive Symptoms-Pediatric (Adaptive Test)

"This patient-reported outcome measure s will be completed by the child patient electronically on an iPad using computer adaptive test (CAT). The CAT consists of 4-12 questions on feelings related to depressive symptoms. The number of questions a patient answers depends on how he or she answers each question. The domain score is a t-score ranging from 0 to 100 with a score of 50 representing the average score for the general population. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptoms. A score above 55 is considered clinically significant for each domain. A score change of 5 or more is considered a clinically important change in domain severity. This PRO was completed electronically on an iPad using REDCap." (NCT03645057)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Crisaborole-4.0
Tacrolimus 0.03%-5.8

[back to top]

Mean Change in Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire

"This patient-reported outcome measure was completed by the caregiver using an iPad. This is a validated 22 item questionnaire consisting of 4 subscales: Bedtime, Sleep Behavior, Waking During the Night, and Morning Wake Up. The patient/parent will answer each item choosing from: Always if something occurs every night; Usually if it occurs 5 or 6 times a week; Sometimes if it occurs 2 to 4 times a week; Rarely if it occurs once a week; and Never if it occurs less than once a week. Each question is scored on a 3-point scale as 1 = Usually and Always (5-7 times/week); 2 = Sometimes (2-4 times/week); or 3 = Rarely and Never (0-1 time/week). The scores are combined from each subscale to generate a Total Sleep Disturbance Score, which can range from 22 (minimum) to 66 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the sleep disturbance. A Total Sleep Disturbances score over 28 represent clinically significant sleep disturbance." (NCT03645057)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Crisaborole-1.7
Tacrolimus 0.03%-1.3

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With GVHD/Relapse-free (GRFS) Survival

GRFS is defined as survival without grade III-IV acute graft versus host disease (GVHD), systemic therapy requiring chronic GVHD, relapse, or death at 12 months after matched related/unrelated donor bone marrow or peripheral blood allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) using myeloablative conditioning (MAC). Patients who are alive without GVHD will be censored at the last follow-up. (NCT03699631)
Timeframe: Day 365

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Tocilizumab25

[back to top]

Tacrolimus Dose at Therapeutic Tacrolimus Concentration

Tacrolimus dose at therapeutic tacrolimus concentration (NCT03713645)
Timeframe: At time of therapeutic tacrolimus concentration up to 30 days

Interventionmg/day (Median)
Non-Expresser12
Intermediate Metabolizer16
Extensive Metabolizer16

[back to top]

Tacrolimus Dose During Study Period

Tacrolimus dose during study period (NCT03713645)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionmg/day (Median)
Non-Expresser9.6
Intermediate Metabolizer12.5
Extensive Metabolizer13.8

[back to top]

Weight-based Tacrolimus Dose During Study Period

Weight-based tacrolimus dose during study period (NCT03713645)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionmg/kg/day (Median)
Non-Expresser0.128
Intermediate Metabolizer0.136
Extensive Metabolizer0.176

[back to top]

Weight Based Tacrolimus Dose at Therapeutic Concentration

Weight based tacrolimus dose at therapeutic concentration (NCT03713645)
Timeframe: At time of therapeutic tacrolimus concentration up to 30 days

Interventionmg/kg/day (Median)
Non-Expresser0.13
Intermediate Metabolizer0.20
Extensive Metabolizer0.19

[back to top]

Time to First Therapeutic Tacrolimus Trough Concentration From Initiation of Tacrolimus Extended Release Measured in Days

Therapeutic tacrolimus trough= 8-10ng/mL (NCT03713645)
Timeframe: Within the first 30 days of kidney transplant

Interventiondays (Median)
Non-Expresser4.5
Intermediate Metabolizer6
Extensive Metabolizer13.5

[back to top]

Tacrolimus Trough Level During Study Period

Tacrolimus trough level during study period (NCT03713645)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Non-Expresser10.78
Intermediate Metabolizer9.18
Extensive Metabolizer7.98

[back to top]

Average Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Within 30 Days

eGFR (NCT03713645)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionml/min/173m^2 (Median)
Non-Expresser40
Intermediate Metabolizer46
Extensive Metabolizer31.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With no Impact of Tremor on Quality of Life

"Assessed via QUEST questionnaire which includes a self-assessment of tremor impact on quality of life. The following areas related to impact on tremor are assessed by this scale:~Patients will select the severity of tremor in each of the following body parts on a scale of (none: no tremor at any time, mild: mild tremor not causing difficulty in performing any activities, moderate: tremor causes difficulty in performing some activities, marked: tremor causes difficulty in performing most or all activities, severe: tremor prevents performing some activities).~Head~Voice~Right arm/hand~Left arm/hand~Right leg/foot~Left leg/foot~Several questions will be answered relating to specific situations and the impact of tremor on those situations (scale: never/no, rarely, sometimes, frequently, always/yes, not applicable)" (NCT03713645)
Timeframe: At 30 days after kidney transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tacrolimus Extended-release 0.13mg/kg/Day35

[back to top]

Graft vs Host Disease (GvHD)

"Recipients will be monitored for Grade 2 to 4 graft vs host disease (GvHD). The outcome is reported as the number of transplant recipients who experienced acute GvHD grades 2 to 4, the number of transplant recipients who experienced chronic and extensive GvHD. In addition, the number of transplant recipients with chronic and extensive GvHD that was refractory to treatment (persistent) is reported. Per protocol, the result for chronic extensive and persistent GvHD is based on the subset of participants that had chronic and extensive GvHD." (NCT03734601)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Acute GvHDChronic extensive GvHDChronic extensive and persistent GvHD
TBI+TLI583

[back to top]

Full-dose Donor Chimerism (FDC) at Day 28 Following TLI/ATG/TBI Conditioning.

Subsequent to TLI/ATG/TBI conditioning, the proportion of participants with full dose donor chimerism (FDC) will be determined by Day 28. FDC is defined as achieving ≥ 95% donor type in the CD3+ lineage within 28 days of donor cell infusion, as assessed by short tandem repeat (STR) testing. The outcome will be expressed as the number of participants that achieve FDC by Day 28, a number without dispersion. (NCT03734601)
Timeframe: Day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TBI+TLI13

[back to top]

Disease Progression

Transplant recipients will be assessed for disease progression at 1 year after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The outcome is reported as the number of transplant recipients who experienced disease progression. (NCT03734601)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TBI+TLI7

[back to top]

Non-relapse Mortality (NRM)

Non-relapse mortality (NRM) is defined as death without known disease relapse or recurrence. The outcome is expressed as the number of transplant recipients whose cause of death was not disease relapse or recurrence, a number without dispersion. (NCT03734601)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TBI+TLI2

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) at 1 Year

Event-free survival (EFS) is defined as the number of transplant recipients remaining alive at 12 months after transplant and who did not experience disease relapse defined as blasts < 5%. The outcome is expressed as the number of transplant recipients remaining alive at 12 months after transplant without disease relapse, a number without dispersion. (NCT03734601)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TBI+TLI16

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the number of transplant recipients remaining alive at 12 months after transplant. The outcome is expressed as the number of transplant recipients who remained alive at 12 months after treatment, a number without dispersion. (NCT03734601)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TBI+TLI16

[back to top]

Evaluate the Effect of Envarsus Conversion as Evidenced by a 15% Decrease in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) and Proteinuria.

This assessment will include incidence of rejection, graft failure, graft dysfunction as defined by a 15% decrease in estimated GFR and proteinuria (NCT03762473)
Timeframe: at 300 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Study Group0
Control Group0

[back to top]

Participants Will Experience Less BK Infection Episodes Based on Nephropathy Results.

The evidence of BK virus infection will be measured by nephropathy as defined by Banff classification (sv 40 positivity with or without tubulitis or if/ta). (NCT03762473)
Timeframe: at 300 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Study Group1
Control Group1

[back to top]

Participants Will Experience Less BK Infection Episodes Based on Viremia Results.

The evidence of BK virus infection will be measured by viremia >500 copies. (NCT03762473)
Timeframe: at 300 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Study Group8
Control Group15

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Viruria >500 Copies

Participants will experience less BK infection episodes based on viruria reported with >500 copies. (NCT03762473)
Timeframe: at 300 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Study Group14
Control Group22

[back to top]

Evaluate the Safety of Envarsus Treatment as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.

Safety will be assessed for all Grade 3 or higher infection (NCT03762473)
Timeframe: at 300 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Study Group1
Control Group0

[back to top]

Duration of Overall Survival After Receiving Nivolumab, Tacrolimus, and Prednisone

The time from the participant's first dose of nivolumab to the date of death from any cause. (NCT03816332)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Nivolumab, Tacrolimus, and Prednisone9.1

[back to top]

Duration of Progression-free Survival After Receiving Nivolumab, Tacrolimus, and Prednisone

From the first dose of nivolumab to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. (NCT03816332)
Timeframe: Up to 4 months

Interventiondays (Mean)
Nivolumab, Tacrolimus, and Prednisone59

[back to top]

Number (and Percentage) of Outcome Responses After Receiving Nivolumab, Tacrolimus, and Prednisone

Percentage of kidney transplant recipients who experienced complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) without allograft loss. (NCT03816332)
Timeframe: At 16 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) without allograft lossProgressive Disease (PD) without allograft loss
Nivolumab, Tacrolimus, and Prednisone08

[back to top]

Rate of Allograft Loss After Receiving Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Tacrolimus, and Prednisone

Number of patients who experienced allograft loss after receiving nivolumab, ipilimumab, tacrolimus, and prednisone. (NCT03816332)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Experienced allograft lossDid not experience allograft loss
Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Tacrolimus, and Prednisone33

[back to top]

Number of Days Needed to Recover From Delayed Graft Function (DGF)

The primary endpoint of the study will be the length of time between first dialysis and last dialysis after kidney transplant (duration of DGF). (NCT03864926)
Timeframe: up to 3 months post transplant

Interventiondays (Median)
Standard of Care14.0
Experimental15.0

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Tacrolimus or Envarsus XR Dose Adjustments Required During the Period of DGF

The secondary endpoint will be number of tacrolimus or Envarsus XR dose adjustments required during the period of DGF. (NCT03864926)
Timeframe: up to 3 months post transplant

Interventiondose adjustments (Median)
Standard of Care4.0
Experimental3.0

[back to top]

Severity of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)

The highest grade (1-4) of acute GvHD experienced by participants as measured from day of transplantation to Day +100 using the Glucksberg criteria (NCT04002115)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionpercentage of Participants (Number)
Clofarabine 30 mg/m^20

[back to top]

Rate of Chronic GVHD

The rate of any grade (1-4) of Chronic GvHD as measured from Day +100 to Year 1 post-transplantation using the Glucksberg criteria. (NCT04002115)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of Participants (Number)
Clofarabine 30 mg/m^20

[back to top]

Rate of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)

The rate of any grade (1-4) of acute GvHD as measured from day of transplantation to Day +100 using the Glucksberg criteria. (NCT04002115)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionpercentage of Participants (Number)
Clofarabine 30 mg/m^20

[back to top]

Neutrophil Engraftment

Rates of engraftment, defined as the first day of Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) greater than 500 for the first of three consecutive days (NCT04002115)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of Participants (Number)
Clofarabine 30 mg/m^20

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate at Day 30 Post HSCT

The CR rate at 30 days (Day +30) post stem cell transplant infusion (NCT04002115)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionpercentage of Participants (Number)
Clofarabine 30 mg/m^2100

[back to top] [back to top]

Severity of Chronic GVHD

The highest overall grade (1-4) of chronic GvHD experienced by participants as measured from Day +100 to Year 1 post-transplantation using the Glucksberg criteria (NCT04002115)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of Participants (Number)
Clofarabine 30 mg/m^20

[back to top]

Median Sublingual (SL) to Oral (PO) Ratio

Total daily dose will be divided by the corresponding trough whole blood concentration for each route of administration to determine the dosing ratio of SL:PO. [(daily doseSL/blood concentrationSL)/(daily dosePO/blood concentrationPO)] for each individual participant. (NCT04041219)
Timeframe: 14 days

Interventionratio (Median)
Allogeneic Blood or Marrow Transplantation1.02

[back to top]

Median Tacrolimus Sublingual Trough Level

Trough level is the lowest concentration in the patient's bloodstream and was collected after four consecutive sublingual doses. Measured as ng/mL. (NCT04041219)
Timeframe: 14 days

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Allogeneic Blood or Marrow Transplantation11.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from HCT to death due to any cause. Participants who were alive at the end of the 180 days post HCT were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. (NCT04095858)
Timeframe: Up to 180 days after HCT

Interventiondays (Median)
PlaceboNA
CD24Fc TreatmentNA

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS)

DFS is defined as the earlier of time to leukemia relapse, or death, whichever occurred first. Subjects that were alive and did not experience disease relapse at the end of the follow-up period (180 days after HCT) were censored at the last date of evaluation. (NCT04095858)
Timeframe: Up to 180 days after HCT

Interventiondays (Median)
PlaceboNA
CD24Fc TreatmentNA

[back to top]

180 Day Grade III-IV aGVHD-free and Relapse-free Survival (aGVHD RFS)

Grade III-IV aGVHD RFS was defined as the time in days to the earlier of the first documented acute Grade III-IV aGVHD, relapse, or death by any cause in 180 days after HCT. Event grading was based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.03 criteria. Participants who did not drop out, experience Grade III-IV aGVHD, relapse, or death were censored at Day 180. (NCT04095858)
Timeframe: Up to 180 days after HCT

Interventiondays (Median)
PlaceboNA
CD24Fc TreatmentNA

[back to top]

180 Day Grade II-IV aGFS

Grade II-IV aGFS was defined as the time in days to the earlier of the first documented acute Grade II-IV GVHD or death by any cause in 180 days after HCT. Event grading was based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.03 criteria. Participants who did not drop out or experience aGVHD or death were censored at the time of leukemia relapse or Day 180, whichever came first. (NCT04095858)
Timeframe: Up to 180 days after HCT

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo45.0
CD24Fc TreatmentNA

[back to top]

180 Day Grade III-IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD)-Free Survival (aGFS)

Grade III-IV aGFS was defined as the time in days to the earlier of the first documented acute Grade III-IV GVHD or death by any cause in 180 days after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Event grading was based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.03 criteria. Participants who did not drop out or experience aGVHD or death were censored at the time of leukemia relapse or Day 180, whichever came first. (NCT04095858)
Timeframe: Up to 180 days after HCT

Interventiondays (Median)
PlaceboNA
CD24Fc TreatmentNA

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Grade II-IV Acute Graft-versus Host Disease (GvHD (aGVHD)

The event will be onset of grade II-IV aGvHD and time to aGvHD will be defined as the period of time from transplantation to the event of aGvHD. Death and early relapse without aGvHD will be competing risks. Cumulative incidence rate of aGVHD with 95% confidence intervals will be estimated from the cumulative incidence curves. To evaluate the association between patient characteristics and aGVHD, the Gray's test accounting for competing risks will be used to compare the cumulative incidence curves and a proportional hazards model for the sub distribution of competing risks will be used to estimate the hazard ratio. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) will be similarly analyzed. (NCT04205240)
Timeframe: Up to 6 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Conditioning Regimen, Stem Cell Transplant)0

[back to top]

Number of Patients With a Partial Response

The proportion of each type of response with a 95% CI will be reported for all evaluable patients, assuming a binomial distribution. (NCT04205240)
Timeframe: Approximately 11 months

Interventionpatients (Number)
Treatment (Conditioning Regimen, Stem Cell Transplant)1

[back to top]

Graft-versus-host Disease Free Relapse Free (GRFS) at 1 Year

GRFS is defined as time from the date of transplantation to the first time of observing following events: grade 3-4 acute graft versus host disease (GVHD), chronic GVHD requiring systemic treatment, relapse, or death, whichever occurs first. Kaplan-Meier curve will be generated for GRFS. (NCT04339101)
Timeframe: From the date of transplantation to the first time of observing following events: grade 3-4 acute graft versus host disease (GVHD), chronic GVHD requiring systemic treatment, relapse, or death, whichever occurs first, assessed at 1 year post transplant.

Interventionpercentage of probability (Number)
Treatment (Itacitinib Adipate, Tacrolimus, Sirolimus)56

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD

Acute GVHD will be graded and staged according to the Consensus Grading. (NCT04339101)
Timeframe: From day 0 (date of stem cell infusion) through 100 days post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of probability (Number)
Treatment (Itacitinib Adipate, Tacrolimus, Sirolimus)4

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Kaplan-Meier curve will be generated for PFS. (NCT04339101)
Timeframe: From the date of stem cell infusion to the date of death, disease relapse/progression, or last follow-up, whichever occurs first, assessed at 1 year post transplant

Interventionpercentage of probability (Number)
Treatment (Itacitinib Adipate, Tacrolimus, Sirolimus)70

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GvHD by Day +120

"The first day of grade II-IV acute GvHD will be used to calculate the cumulative incidence. The cumulative incidence will be defined as the percentage of participants with grade II-IV acute GvHD. The diagnosis of acute GvHD is based on clinical and pathological evaluation by the principal investigator in collaboration with the treating physician.~Overall Grades of Acute GvHD:~0 = none;~= mild;~= moderate;~= severe;~= life threatening" (NCT04503616)
Timeframe: 120 days

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
HSCT Patients17.4

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration (AUC 72)

Measurement of whole blood tacrolimus prior to dosing and up to 72 hours post-dose (NCT04725682)
Timeframe: 72 hours

Interventionpg.h/mL (Mean)
Tacrolimus (Generic)37434.51
Tacrolimus (Brand)33716.80

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration (AUC 0-t)

Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero until the last measurable concentration or last sampling time t, whichever occurs first. (NCT04725682)
Timeframe: To the last measurable concentration or last sampling time t, whichever occurs first. (0 to 144 hours post-dose)

Interventionpg.h/mL (Mean)
Tacrolimus (Generic)41480.11
Tacrolimus (Brand)38744.54

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Measurement of whole blood tacrolimus prior to dosing and up to 144 hours post-dose (NCT04725682)
Timeframe: 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50, 1.75, 2.00, 2.25, 2.50, 2.75, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 5.00, 6.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 16.00, 24.00, 36.00, 48.00, 72.00, 96.00, 120.00, 144.00 hours

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Tacrolimus (Generic)6780.05
Tacrolimus (Brand)4246.68

[back to top]

Time at Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)

Measurement of whole blood tacrolimus prior to dosing and up to 144 hours post-dose (NCT04725682)
Timeframe: 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50, 1.75, 2.00, 2.25, 2.50, 2.75, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 5.00, 6.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 16.00, 24.00, 36.00, 48.00, 72.00, 96.00, 120.00, 144.00 hours

Interventionhour (Median)
Tacrolimus (Generic)1.00
Tacrolimus (Brand)1.50

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration (AUC Inf)

Time curve from time zero to infinity, calculated as AUCt + Clast/λ, where Clast is the last measurable concentration. Measurement of whole blood tacrolimus prior to dosing and up to 144 hours post-dose. (NCT04725682)
Timeframe: Estimated using the last measurable concentration (144 hours)

Interventionpg.h/mL (Mean)
Tacrolimus (Generic)45484.38
Tacrolimus (Brand)42764.68

[back to top]