Page last updated: 2024-11-04

imidazole

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

imidazole: RN given refers to parent cpd [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

1H-imidazole : An imidazole tautomer which has the migrating hydrogen at position 1. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID795
CHEMBL ID540
CHEBI ID16069
CHEBI ID14434
MeSH IDM0095023

Synonyms (133)

Synonym
him
CHEBI:16069 ,
brn 0103853
nsc 60522
einecs 206-019-2
glioksal [polish]
nsc 51860
nsc-60522
wln: t5m cnj
imutex
glyoxalin
iminazole
1,4-cyclopentadiene
imidazol
nsc60522
formamidine,n'-vinylene-
usaf ek-4733
methanimidamide,n'-1,2-ethenediyl-
miazole
bdbm7882
chembl540 ,
IMD ,
nsc51860
1,3-diaza-2,4-cyclopentadiene-
MLS001055465
smr000057825
inchi=1/c3h4n2/c1-2-5-3-4-1/h1-3h,(h,4,5
1h-imidazole (9ci)
ccris 3345
imidazole (8ci)
ai3-24703
methanimidamide, n,n'-1,2-ethenediyl-
pyrro(b)monazole
formamidine, n,n'-vinylene-
NCGC00090984-01
STK362967
n,n'-vinyleneformamidine
imidazole
C01589
1,3-diazole
1,3-diaza-2,4-cyclopentadiene
pyrro[b]monazole
288-32-4
1h-imidazole
glyoxaline
n,n'-1,2-ethenediylmethanimidamide
imidazole, acs reagent, >=99% (titration)
imidazole, for molecular biology, >=99% (titration)
imidazole, >=99% (titration), crystalline
DB03366
NCISTRUC2_000693
NCISTRUC1_001975
imidazole, bioultra, for molecular biology, >=99.5% (gc)
imidazole, puriss. p.a., >=99.5% (gc)
imidazole, bioultra, >=99.5% (gc)
4286D518-643C-4C69-BCE7-519D073F4992
BMSE000096
I0001
I0014
I0288
I0290
AKOS000120177
NCGC00090984-02
BMSE000790
cas-288-32-4
tox21_303345
NCGC00257344-01
dtxcid809616
dtxsid2029616 ,
tox21_201504
NCGC00259055-01
FT-0670295
5-23-04-00191 (beilstein handbook reference)
unii-7gbn705nh1
ec 206-019-2
7gbn705nh1 ,
hsdb 8449
glioksal
BP-11451
FT-0627179
imidazole [who-dd]
ondansetron hydrochloride dihydrate impurity e [ep impurity]
clotrimazole impurity d [ep impurity]
enalapril maleate impurity i [ep impurity]
sildenafil citrate impurity e [ep impurity]
imidazole [inci]
ondansetron hydrochloride impurity, imidazole- [usp impurity]
enalapril impurity i
flutrimazole impurity a [ep impurity]
imidazole [mi]
imidazole [usp-rs]
S6006
AM82000
HY-D0837
CS-5135
1-h-imidazole
immidazole
1h-imidazol
mfcd00005183
J-200340
F2190-0638
imidazole, anhydrous, free-flowing, redi-dri(tm), acs reagent, >=99%
imidazole, pharmaceutical impurity standard, >=95.0% (hplc)
imidazole, saj special grade, >=99.0%
imidazole, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
imidazole, reagentplus(r), 99%
imidazole, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
{pyrro[b]monazole}
imidazole, acs grade
P17516
ondansetron impurity e, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
imidazole, for synthesis, 99.5%
imidazole, lr, >=99%
imidazole, pharmaceutical secondary standard; certified reference material
imidazole, vetec(tm) reagent grade, 98%
6745-43-3
Q328692
imidazole, reagent
imidazole zone refined (number of passes:30)
BCP26547
imidazole;1,3-diazole; glyoxaline; 1,3-diazacyclopenta-2,4-diene
imidazole-
227760-40-9
EN300-19083
imidazole-13c,15n2(major)
glyoxaline solution
imidazole buffer solution
imidazole (usp-rs)
enalapril maleate impurity i (ep impurity)
chebi:14434
clotrimazole impurity d (ep impurity)
sildenafil citrate impurity e (ep impurity)
Z104472692

Research Excerpts

Overview

Imidazole is a small but important molecule occurring as a structure fragment in systems from amino acids, over ionic liquids, to synthetic polymers. It acts as a subunit in the DNA base adenine and the amino acid histidine-both important biomolecules which display low fluorescence quantum yields following UV excitation.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Imidazole is a biologically and pharmaceutically important nitrogen-containing heterocyclic ring."( Imidazole and Derivatives Drugs Synthesis: A Review.
Kumar, P; Rani, N; Singh, R, 2023
)
3.07
"The imidazole group is an ubiquitous chemical motif present in several key types of biomolecules. "( Evolutionary convergence in the biosyntheses of the imidazole moieties of histidine and purines.
Becerra, A; Lazcano, A; Vázquez-Salazar, A, 2018
)
1.29
"Imidazole ring is an important five-membered aromatic heterocycle widely present in natural products and synthetic molecules. "( Comprehensive review in current developments of imidazole-based medicinal chemistry.
Damu, GL; Geng, RX; Peng, XM; Zhang, L; Zhou, CH, 2014
)
2.1
"Imidazole (C3H4N2) is an important biomaterial for material research and applications. "( Hydrogen bonds and ionic forms versus polymerization of imidazole at high pressures.
Murli, C; Sharma, BB; Sharma, SM; Thomas, S; Verma, AK, 2015
)
2.11
"Imidazole is a small but important molecule occurring as a structure fragment in systems from amino acids, over ionic liquids, to synthetic polymers. "( Aqueous imidazole solutions: a structural perspective from simulations with high-rank electrostatic multipole moments.
Liem, SY; Popelier, PL; Shaik, MS, 2011
)
2.25
"Imidazole acts as a subunit in the DNA base adenine and the amino acid histidine-both important biomolecules which display low fluorescence quantum yields following UV excitation. "( Investigation of multiple electronic excited state relaxation pathways following 200 nm photolysis of gas-phase imidazole.
Evans, NL; Stavros, VG; Ullrich, S; Yu, H, 2012
)
2.03
"Imidazole is a reagent widely used in protein purifying processes. "( Imidazole as a catalyst for in vitro refolding of enhanced green fluorescent protein.
Guan, Y; Hua, Z; Huang, Y; Li, Y; Pan, Q; Shi, R; Zhao, M, 2007
)
3.23
"Imidazole acts as a heme-site inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). "( Identification of imidazole as L-arginine-competitive inhibitor of porcine brain nitric oxide synthase.
Klatt, P; Mayer, B; Schmidt, K; Werner, ER, 1994
)
2.07
"Thus imidazole is a stronger denaturant than urea, at least at dilute concentration."( Characterization of imidazole as a DNA denaturant by using TGGE of PCR products from a random pool of DNA.
Ariyama, T; Eli, P; Husimi, Y; Nishigaki, K, 1999
)
1.08

Effects

Imidazole has been proposed to reverse renal vasoconstriction following unilateral obstruction, presumably through blockade of thromboxane A2 (TXA2) synthesis. Imidazol antifungals have been used with success in scalp psoriasis.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Al-imidazole has a larger bond dissociation energy than Cu-imidazole, although the opposite order was previously found for the corresponding ions."( Electron spectroscopy, molecular structures, and binding energies of Al- and Cu-imidazole.
Lee, JS; Wang, X; Yang, DS, 2006
)
1.07
"Al-imidazole has a larger bond dissociation energy than Cu-imidazole, although the opposite order was previously found for the corresponding ions."( Electron spectroscopy, molecular structures, and binding energies of Al- and Cu-imidazole.
Lee, JS; Wang, X; Yang, DS, 2006
)
1.07
"Imidazole has been proposed to reverse renal vasoconstriction following unilateral obstruction, presumably through blockade of thromboxane A2 (TXA2) synthesis. "( Effect of imidazole on renal function in unilateral ureteral-obstructed rat kidneys.
Anderson, ME; Edwards, BS; Knox, FG; Romero, JC; Strand, JC, 1981
)
2.11
"Imidazole antifungals have been used with success in scalp psoriasis."( Psoriasis of the scalp. Diagnosis and management.
Franssen, ME; van de Kerkhof, PC, 2001
)
1.03

Actions

Imidazole was used because it is a potent inducer of cytochrome P-450 isozyme 3a which is also induced by ethanol. The imidazoles increase in contracture appears to be mediated through increased influx of calcium.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The imidazole-induced increase in contracture appears to be mediated through increased influx of calcium."( Effect of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase regulators on isolated rat uterus: with observations on their mechanism of action.
Sharma, PL; Singh, M, 1985
)
0.75
"Imidazole was used because it is a potent inducer of cytochrome P-450 isozyme 3a which is also induced by ethanol."( Characterization of halothane oxidation by hepatic microsomes and purified cytochromes P-450 using a gas chromatographic mass spectrometric assay.
Gruenke, LD; Konopka, K; Koop, DR; Waskell, LA, 1988
)
1

Treatment

Imidazole treatment (10 mg/100 g b.m., intraperitoneally, twice a day for two days) failed to influence the arterial blood pressure, the cardiac output and its distribution in organs investigated. Imidazoles significantly inhibited thromboxane production, but augmented production of prostacyclin and PGE2.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"In imidazole treated cells, the G1/G0 phase cell proportion increased, whereas in the S and G2/M phases the cell proportion decreased."( Inhibition of Colon Cancer Cell Growth by Imidazole Through Activation of Apoptotic Pathway.
Long, Y; Wang, D, 2019
)
1.29
"Imidazole-treated cells showed a reduction in the level of Tcf/Lef target genes involved in the β-catenin signaling network, including ubiquitous genes such as Axin2, Lef1, and Wisp1 as well as cell lineage-restricted genes such as microphthalmia-associated transcription factor and dopachrome tautomerase."( Inhibition of melanogenesis by the pyridinyl imidazole class of compounds: possible involvement of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.
Bellei, B; Izzo, E; Picardo, M; Pitisci, A, 2012
)
1.36
"Imidazole pretreatment prevented a rise of TxB(2), but not 6-keto-PGF(1alpha); indomethacin blocked both."( Thromboxane mediation of cardiopulmonary effects of embolism.
Hechtman, HB; Krausz, MM; Levine, L; Shepro, D; Utsonomiya, T, 1982
)
0.99
"Imidazole treatment (i) causes moderate inhibition of 125I-labeled transferrin binding to both control and Me2SO-treated MEL cells; (ii) markedly suppresses Me2SO-induced activation of iron uptake into MEL cells; (iii) markedly decreases the incorporation of iron into ferritin; and (iv) abolishes heme biosynthesis from [2-14C]glycine and hemoglobin accumulation in Me2SO-treated cells."( Dissociation of iron transport and heme biosynthesis from commitment to terminal maturation of murine erythroleukemia cells.
Nunez, MT; Robinson, SH; Tsiftsoglou, AS; Wong, W, 1983
)
0.99
"When imidazole as pretreated with alpha-N-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone, the ability of this imidazole solution to restore amidolytic activity to MrhPm was eliminated, suggesting that N alpha-(p-tosyl)lysine chloromethyl ketone directs into the binding pocket a derivatized form of imidazole, which is ineffective as an His-603 substitute."( Breaching the conformational integrity of the catalytic triad of the serine protease plasmin: localized disruption of a side chain of His-603 strongly inhibits the amidolytic activity of human plasmin.
Castellino, FJ; Chibber, BA; Mhashilkar, AM; Viswanatha, T, 1993
)
0.74
"Imidazole treatment (10 mg/100 g b.m., intraperitoneally, twice a day for two days) failed to influence the arterial blood pressure, the cardiac output and its distribution in organs investigated (heart, muscle, lung [bronchial fraction], skin, liver, spleen, small intestine, adrenal gland and kidneys)."( Cardiac output distribution and intrarenal haemodynamics: role of thromboxanes.
Bartha, J; Hably, C; Menz, V, 1991
)
1
"Imidazole treatment significantly reduced the decrement in SV."( Cardiovascular effects of high frequency ventilation--the possible involvement of thromboxane.
Durante, W; Sunahara, FA, 1987
)
0.99
"Imidazole pretreatment (50 mg/kg i.p.) significantly inhibited thromboxane production, but augmented production of prostacyclin and PGE2."( Thromboxane synthetase inhibition with imidazole increases blood flow in ischemic penumbra.
Cowen, DE; Dempsey, RJ; Donaldson, DL; Roy, MW; Young, AB, 1988
)
1.27
"Imidazole pretreatment also enhanced rates of the microsomal metabolism of 7-ethoxycoumarin and aminopyrine, but did not affect rates of aniline or p-nitrophenol hydroxylation."( Comparison of ethanol and imidazole pretreatments on hepatic monooxygenase activities in the rat.
Reinke, LA; Rikans, LE; Sexter, SH, 1985
)
1.29
"Treatment with imidazole led to chromatin material condensation, detaching of cells, and apoptotic nuclei."( Inhibition of Colon Cancer Cell Growth by Imidazole Through Activation of Apoptotic Pathway.
Long, Y; Wang, D, 2019
)
1.12
"Pretreatment with imidazole, which attenuated the lipid-induced increase in thromboxane B2 concentration, completely blocked the pulmonary hemodynamic response to lipid.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)"( Lung vascular effects of lipid infusion in awake lambs.
Berner, ME; Bland, RD; Braun, D; Clyman, RI; Raj, JU; Teague, WG, 1987
)
0.6

Toxicity

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" When we administered the combination of captopril (100 mg X kg-1 X day-1) and gentamicin in potassium-depleted rats, we observed a surprising and significant adverse effect of this combination on the clearances of inulin (CIn) and PAH (CPAH) and renal blood flow (RBF)."( Captopril enhances aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity in potassium-depleted rats.
Baker, JD; Boatman, JE; Klotman, PE; Volpp, BD; Yarger, WE, 1985
)
0.27
" In what respects the effect of the different cations, it is possible to recognize that the phosphonium-based ILs seem to be more toxic when compared to the analog imidazolium-based ILs (with the same anion and alkyl chains)."( Toxicity assessment of various ionic liquid families towards Vibrio fischeri marine bacteria.
Afonso, CA; Coutinho, JA; Gonçalves, F; Marques, CS; Rosatella, AA; Ventura, SP, 2012
)
0.38
" Stable O/W emulsions and gels were prepared containing the less toxic choline-based ILs and caffeine."( Choline- versus imidazole-based ionic liquids as functional ingredients in topical delivery systems: cytotoxicity, solubility, and skin permeation studies.
Araújo, MEM; Baby, AR; Fernandes, AS; Júlio, A; Mota, JP; Rosado, C; Santos de Almeida, T; Saraiva, N, 2017
)
0.8
" SOF-based therapy was well-tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported."( Safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antiviral regimens for hepatitis C virus genotype 6 in Southwest China: Real-world experience of a retrospective study.
Chen, B; Chen, EQ; Jiang, W; Tang, H; Tao, YC; Wang, ML; Wang, YH; Wu, DB, 2019
)
0.51
" All doses of DS-1040 were well tolerated; no serious/severe adverse events (AEs) or discontinuations due to AEs occurred."( First-in-Human Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of an Oral Formulation of DS-1040, an Inhibitor of the Activated Form of Thrombin-Activatable Fibrinolysis Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects.
Atiee, G; Dishy, V; Kobayashi, F; Kochan, J; Limsakun, T; Pav, J; Vashi, V; Warren, V; Yin, O; Zamora, C; Zhou, J, 2019
)
0.51

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Flutrimazole presented a biological half-life (t1/2) of 14."( Pharmacokinetic study of [14C]flutrimazole after oral and intravenous administration in dogs. Comparison with clotrimazole.
Basi, N; Conte, L; Forn, J; Mis, R; Ramis, J; Vilageliu, J, 1992
)
0.28
" The mean terminal half-life ranged from 17."( First-in-Human Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of an Oral Formulation of DS-1040, an Inhibitor of the Activated Form of Thrombin-Activatable Fibrinolysis Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects.
Atiee, G; Dishy, V; Kobayashi, F; Kochan, J; Limsakun, T; Pav, J; Vashi, V; Warren, V; Yin, O; Zamora, C; Zhou, J, 2019
)
0.51

Compound-Compound Interactions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Compound 4d, a novel TGR5 agonist, in combination with Sitagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, has demonstrated an adequate GLP-1 secretion and glucose lowering effect in animal models, suggesting a potential clinical option in treatment of type-2 diabetes."( Evaluation of novel TGR5 agonist in combination with Sitagliptin for possible treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Agarwal, S; Bhayani, H; Deshmukh, P; Giri, P; Giri, S; Jain, M; Kulkarni, N; Kumar, J; Sasane, S; Soman, S, 2018
)
0.48

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Lead optimization efforts which included the optimization of structure-activity relationships and drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic properties led to the identification of compound 9m, a potent, selective and orally bioavailable inhibitor of IGF-1R with in vivo efficacy in an IGF-driven mouse xenograft model."( Potent and selective cyclohexyl-derived imidazopyrazine insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor inhibitors with in vivo efficacy.
Bittner, MA; Cooke, A; Dong, H; Foreman, K; Gokhale, PC; Ji, Q; Jin, M; Kleinberg, A; Landfair, D; Mak, G; Mulvihill, KM; Mulvihill, MJ; O'Connor, M; Pachter, JA; Rosenfeld-Franklin, M; Siu, KW; Wild, R; Yao, Y, 2011
)
0.37
" Structure-activity-relationship studies and lead optimization led to the discovery of potent, selective and orally bioavailable Smoothened antagonist 19 that is suitable for in vivo studies."( Design, synthesis, and structure-activity-relationship of phenyl imidazoles as potent Smoothened antagonists.
Cheng, D; Englund, NP; Gao, W; Han, D; Jiang, J; Jing, Q; Pan, S; Tuntland, T; Wan, Y; Wu, X, 2012
)
0.62
" Compound 4 h, which contains a substituted tricyclic 6-6-6 xanthene, demonstrated broad genotypic spectrum, compelling potency, and good oral bioavailability with dose-dependent drug exposure level in multiple animal species."( Potent bisimidazole-based HCV NS5A inhibitors bearing annulated tricyclic motifs.
Colonno, R; Huang, N; Huang, Q; Huq, A; Lau, M; Li, L; Peng, E; Zhong, M, 2014
)
0.8
"We describe the effects of pH on the structure and bioavailability of MIDD0301, an oral lead compound for asthma."( The Effects of pH on the Structure and Bioavailability of Imidazobenzodiazepine-3-Carboxylate MIDD0301.
Arnold, LA; Cook, JM; Knutson, DE; Li, G; Mian, MY; Mikulsky, BN; Roni, MSR; Stafford, DC; Zahn, NM, 2020
)
0.56

Dosage Studied

Imidazole fungicides prochloraz, ketoconazole and imazalil inhibited cortisol secretion in a similar monotonic dose-response pattern with an EC(50) value of approximately 0. Imidazoles had no effect on the dose- response relationship for Ca2+ in the presence of potassium.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Those involving the patient include denial of illness, misconceptions regarding the nature of the infection or its treatment, a misunderstanding of symptomatic relief versus microbiologic cure, dislike of the dosage form, nonsupport of the sexual consort, or intolerance of side effects."( Vulvovaginitis: the role of patient compliance in treatment success.
Nixon, SA, 1991
)
0.28
" There was a dose-response relationship between the amount of drug administered to the rats and 14C labeling of the membrane pool of factor X carboxylase substrates."( Early processing of prothrombin and factor X by the vitamin K-dependent carboxylase.
Martin, LF; Wallin, R, 1988
)
0.27
" Imidazole had no effect on the dose-response relationship for Ca2+ in the presence of potassium, 40 mM."( Imidazole-induced potentiation of the contractile response to various agonists in vascular smooth muscle.
Hester, RK; Ishida, Y; Shibata, S; Suzuki, Y, 1982
)
2.62
" A challenge with IS was carried out in every patient in single-blind fashion, reaching a cumulative dosage of 1000 mg in the fourth session."( Tolerability of imidazole salycilate in aspirin-sensitive patients.
Andri, G; Andri, L; Dama, AR; Mezzelani, P; Senna, GE,
)
0.48
" Dose-response curves with methacholine (MCh) were performed in basal conditions (baseline); 1-1."( Ineffectiveness of a four week treatment with the thromboxane synthetase inhibitor, imidazole salycilate, in reducing airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine in asthmatics.
Casucci, G; Dottorini, ML; Mezzasoma, AM; Peccini, F; Sorbini, CA; Tantucci, C, 1997
)
0.52
" Moreover, the utility of prodrug 8t was demonstrated through similar exposure of the parent compound when the prodrugs were dosed in vivo."( Design and synthesis of imidazole N-H substituted amide prodrugs as inhibitors of hepatitis C virus replication.
Cai, J; Chen, B; Chen, J; Ji, M; Li, W; Wang, P; Zhou, G; Zong, X, 2015
)
0.72
" Alternative dosing regimens and combination with other targeted agents are needed to achieve successful development of nutlin in the clinical setting."( Heterogeneous Mechanisms of Secondary Resistance and Clonal Selection in Sarcoma during Treatment with Nutlin.
Chaire, V; Chibon, F; Coindre, JM; Hostein, I; Italiano, A; Lagarde, P; Laroche, A; Lesluyes, T; Lucchesi, C; Neuville, A; Tran-Cong, K, 2015
)
0.42
" AVP dose-response experiments recorded IC50s in the low nM range that were similar to IC50s previously reported for HPV16."( Antiviral activity of pyrrole-imidazole polyamides against SV40 and BK polyomaviruses.
Edwards, TG; Fisher, C, 2018
)
0.77
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Drug Classes (1)

ClassDescription
imidazole
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (5)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
histamine biosynthesis421
starch degradation III115
nitroethane degradation115
UDP-u03B1-D-glucose biosynthesis I1424
L-isoleucine biosynthesis II1430

Protein Targets (14)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, MAJOR APURINIC/APYRIMIDINIC ENDONUCLEASEHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.39810.003245.467312,589.2998AID2517
aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1Homo sapiens (human)Potency35.48130.011212.4002100.0000AID1030
retinoic acid nuclear receptor alpha variant 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency52.03610.003041.611522,387.1992AID1159552; AID1159555
retinoid X nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency5.18680.000817.505159.3239AID1159531
estrogen-related nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency18.25010.001530.607315,848.9004AID1224841
Nuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)Potency33.49150.026622.448266.8242AID651802
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Thromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)670.00000.00091.230410.0000AID212779
Nitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)Ki175.00000.01501.18117.3000AID404423
Nitric oxide synthase, inducibleMus musculus (house mouse)IC50 (µMol)40.00000.00103.39119.6000AID147271
Glutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferaseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)352.00005.00005.00005.0000AID1893771
Glutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferaseHomo sapiens (human)Ki100.00000.26202.93587.0000AID1796106
Glutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferaseMus musculus (house mouse)Ki160.00006.40006.40006.4000AID1796111
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Epoxide hydrolase 1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)E1008,800.00006.20006.20006.2000AID208343
Cytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)Ks1,255.00000.70000.70000.7000AID1515301
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (113)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
prostaglandin biosynthetic processThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid metabolic processThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
cyclooxygenase pathwayThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular chloride ion homeostasisThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vasoconstrictionThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
response to fatty acidThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of sodium ion transportNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
arginine catabolic processNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
nitric oxide biosynthetic processNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
striated muscle contractionNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
myoblast fusionNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
response to heatNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of calcium ion transport into cytosolNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cardiac muscle contraction by calcium ion signalingNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-cysteine S-nitrosylationNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylationNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
multicellular organismal response to stressNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
vasodilationNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion transportNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
cell redox homeostasisNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of hydrolase activityNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of serotonin uptakeNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of calcium ion transportNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cardiac muscle contractionNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of ryanodine-sensitive calcium-release channel activityNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to growth factor stimulusNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of the force of heart contractionNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of adenylate cyclase-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of sodium ion transmembrane transportNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of calcium ion transmembrane transport via high voltage-gated calcium channelNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of membrane repolarization during ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of guanylate cyclase activityNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
nitric oxide mediated signal transductionNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
response to hormoneNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of blood pressureNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of glucose metabolic processNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of steroid metabolic processNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular receptor signaling pathwayNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
circadian regulation of gene expressionNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to sterolNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of circadian rhythmNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fat cell differentiationNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
adipose tissue developmentNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
T-helper 17 cell differentiationNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
protein foldingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
response to bacteriumPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
chaperone-mediated protein foldingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
protein peptidyl-prolyl isomerizationPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to organic cyclic compoundCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
angiogenesisCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
trabecular meshwork developmentCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA modificationCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
nitric oxide biosynthetic processCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
cell adhesionCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
response to nutrientCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
male gonad developmentCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to oxidative stressCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
toxin metabolic processCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor productionCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle cell migrationCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
sterol metabolic processCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
epoxygenase P450 pathwayCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
collagen fibril organizationCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
adrenal gland developmentCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell migrationCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activityCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
response to follicle-stimulating hormoneCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
response to estradiolCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell adhesion mediated by integrinCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
benzene-containing compound metabolic processCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
retinol metabolic processCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
retinal metabolic processCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
blood vessel endothelial cell migrationCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
endothelial cell migrationCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
estrous cycleCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of translationCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of angiogenesisCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
membrane lipid catabolic processCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
response to arsenic-containing substanceCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
blood vessel morphogenesisCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
retinal blood vessel morphogenesisCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
ganglion developmentCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hydrogen peroxideCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cAMPCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to tumor necrosis factorCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to luteinizing hormone stimulusCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cortisol stimulusCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to progesterone stimulusCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
response to dexamethasoneCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
endothelial cell-cell adhesionCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
response to indole-3-methanolCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to toxic substanceCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
omega-hydroxylase P450 pathwayCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
response to 3-methylcholanthreneCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA biosynthetic processCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-pyroglutamic acid biosynthetic process, using glutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferaseGlutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
protein modification processGlutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (39)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
monooxygenase activityThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
thromboxane-A synthase activityThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygenThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
12-hydroxyheptadecatrienoic acid synthase activityThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
hydroperoxy icosatetraenoate dehydratase activityThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
nitric-oxide synthase activityNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
calcium channel regulator activityNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
FMN bindingNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
sodium channel regulator activityNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
heme bindingNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
tetrahydrobiopterin bindingNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
arginine bindingNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter bindingNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
cadmium ion bindingNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
calcium-dependent protein bindingNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
flavin adenine dinucleotide bindingNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
NADP bindingNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
oxysterol bindingNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
ligand-activated transcription factor activityNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activityPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
FK506 bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
protein-macromolecule adaptor activityPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
heat shock protein bindingPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen, reduced flavin or flavoprotein as one donor, and incorporation of one atom of oxygenCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
aromatase activityCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen 16-alpha-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
hydroperoxy icosatetraenoate dehydratase activityCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen, NAD(P)H as one donor, and incorporation of one atom of oxygenCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingGlutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingGlutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
glutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferase activityGlutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (28)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
endoplasmic reticulumThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolThromboxane-A synthase Homo sapiens (human)
photoreceptor inner segmentNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
cytoskeletonNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
sarcoplasmic reticulumNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
sarcolemmaNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
dendritic spineNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
membrane raftNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
synapseNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
cell peripheryNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic densityNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusNitric oxide synthase, brainHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
membranePeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomePeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionGlutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
specific granule lumenGlutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeGlutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
tertiary granule lumenGlutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumenGlutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (46)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1515301Binding affinity to human C-terminal 4His-tagged CYP1B1 expressed in Escherichia coli DH5alpha assessed as spectral dissociation constant by spectrophotometric analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-15, Volume: 27, Issue:2
Design and synthesis of selective CYP1B1 inhibitor via dearomatization of α-naphthoflavone.
AID1893771Inhibition of recombinant human QC using H-Gln-AMC hydrobromide as fluorogenic substrate incubated for 6 hrs by fluorometric microplate reader analysis2022ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-08, Volume: 13, Issue:9
2-Amino-1,3,4-thiadiazoles as Glutaminyl Cyclases Inhibitors Increase Phagocytosis through Modification of CD47-SIRPα Checkpoint.
AID1543820Antiproliferative activity against human MCF7 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 48 hrs by MTS assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 168Synthesis and antitumor activity of novel steroidal imidazolium salt derivatives.
AID161184Inhibition of ram seminal vesicle Cyclooxygenase1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 28, Issue:10
Selective thromboxane synthetase inhibitors. 1. 1-[(Aryloxy)alkyl]-1H-imidazoles.
AID1268846Cytotoxicity against human HL60 cells by MTT assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 26, Issue:2
Synthesis and cytotoxic activity of novel hexahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole imidazolium salts.
AID26810Partition coefficient (logP)1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Structural features of imidazole derivatives that enhance styrene oxide hydrolase activity in rat hepatic microsomes.
AID208343Enhanced styrene oxide hydrolase activity pH 8.71985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Structural features of imidazole derivatives that enhance styrene oxide hydrolase activity in rat hepatic microsomes.
AID1543819Antiproliferative activity against human SMMC7721 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 48 hrs by MTS assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 168Synthesis and antitumor activity of novel steroidal imidazolium salt derivatives.
AID1543822Antiproliferative activity against human SW480 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 48 hrs by MTS assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 168Synthesis and antitumor activity of novel steroidal imidazolium salt derivatives.
AID155525Inhibition of porcine aorta prostacyclin PGI-2 synthase1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 28, Issue:10
Selective thromboxane synthetase inhibitors. 1. 1-[(Aryloxy)alkyl]-1H-imidazoles.
AID404423Inhibition of nNOS assessed as conversion of L-[3H]arginine to L-[3H]citrulline2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 16, Issue:11
Design, synthesis, and evaluation of potential inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase.
AID1543821Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 48 hrs by MTS assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 168Synthesis and antitumor activity of novel steroidal imidazolium salt derivatives.
AID1649764Binding affinity to 15N-labeled FKBP51 (1 to 140 residues) (unknown origin) expressed in Escherichia coli OD2N assessed as induction of chemical shift perturbations at Ile87 residues by two-dimensional 1H/15N HSQC NMR spectroscopy2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-11, Volume: 63, Issue:11
Hybrid Screening Approach for Very Small Fragments: X-ray and Computational Screening on FKBP51.
AID147271Inhibition of purified mouse inducible nitric oxide synthase catalyzed [14C]L-citrulline production at a compound concentration of 1 mM in presence of 50 uM L-arginine1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-18, Volume: 9, Issue:20
Guanidine-substituted imidazoles as inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase.
AID25595Dissociation constant was evaluated1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 39, Issue:11
Comparative molecular moment analysis (CoMMA): 3D-QSAR without molecular superposition.
AID1268850Cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells by MTT assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 26, Issue:2
Synthesis and cytotoxic activity of novel hexahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole imidazolium salts.
AID537734Antifungal activity against yeast AD1-8u expressing Candida albicans CaMdr1p by agar disk diffusion assay2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 45, Issue:11
Analysis of physico-chemical properties of substrates of ABC and MFS multidrug transporters of pathogenic Candida albicans.
AID1649766Binding affinity to 15N-labeled FKBP51 (1 to 140 residues) (unknown origin) expressed in Escherichia coli OD2N by two-dimensional 1H/15N HSQC NMR spectroscopy2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-11, Volume: 63, Issue:11
Hybrid Screening Approach for Very Small Fragments: X-ray and Computational Screening on FKBP51.
AID497162Selectivity ratio of IC50 for Plasmodium falciparum to IC50 for CHO cells2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 18, Issue:16
Anti-Plasmodium activity of imidazolium and triazolium salts.
AID1195896Inhibition of calmodulin-dependent bovine neuronal NOS using [3H]-arginine as substrate assessed as citrulline formation after 30 mins2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 58, Issue:3
Novel 2,4-disubstituted pyrimidines as potent, selective, and cell-permeable inhibitors of neuronal nitric oxide synthase.
AID1268847Cytotoxicity against human SMMC7721 cells by MTT assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 26, Issue:2
Synthesis and cytotoxic activity of novel hexahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole imidazolium salts.
AID537736Antifungal activity against yeast AD1-8u expressing Candida albicans CaCdr1p by agar disk diffusion assay2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 45, Issue:11
Analysis of physico-chemical properties of substrates of ABC and MFS multidrug transporters of pathogenic Candida albicans.
AID760059Inhibition of [15N]-labeled humanized-Xenopus MDM2 (13-119 amino acids) interaction with p53 at 1 mM by NMR method2013ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-11, Volume: 4, Issue:7
Deconstruction of a nutlin: dissecting the binding determinants of a potent protein-protein interaction inhibitor.
AID760057Inhibition of Humanized-Xenopus MDM2 (13-119 amino acids) interaction with p53 at 1 to 2.5 mM by SPR analysis2013ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-11, Volume: 4, Issue:7
Deconstruction of a nutlin: dissecting the binding determinants of a potent protein-protein interaction inhibitor.
AID213129Inhibition of Thromboxane synthetase at 100 uM1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 24, Issue:10
Highly selective inhibitors of thromboxane synthetase. 2. Pyridine derivatives.
AID537735Binding affinity to Candida albicans CaMdr1p expressed in yeast AD1-8u2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 45, Issue:11
Analysis of physico-chemical properties of substrates of ABC and MFS multidrug transporters of pathogenic Candida albicans.
AID497160Antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 after 72 by LDH assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 18, Issue:16
Anti-Plasmodium activity of imidazolium and triazolium salts.
AID687184Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound at pH 2 to 3 by spectrophotometric analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 55, Issue:11
Rational design of 4-aryl-1,2,3-triazoles for indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 inhibition.
AID208350Maximum enhancement of styrene oxide hydrolase activity was reported at compound concentration of 1e-1M1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Structural features of imidazole derivatives that enhance styrene oxide hydrolase activity in rat hepatic microsomes.
AID537733Binding affinity to Candida albicans CaCdr1p expressed in yeast AD1-8u2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 45, Issue:11
Analysis of physico-chemical properties of substrates of ABC and MFS multidrug transporters of pathogenic Candida albicans.
AID1719955Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-13, Volume: 63, Issue:15
Thiazoles, Their Benzofused Systems, and Thiazolidinone Derivatives: Versatile and Promising Tools to Combat Antibiotic Resistance.
AID1268848Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells by MTT assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 26, Issue:2
Synthesis and cytotoxic activity of novel hexahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole imidazolium salts.
AID70214Enhancement of epoxide hydrolase activity1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 28, Issue:8
Structural features of imidazole derivatives that enhance styrene oxide hydrolase activity in rat hepatic microsomes.
AID1268849Cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells by MTT assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 26, Issue:2
Synthesis and cytotoxic activity of novel hexahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole imidazolium salts.
AID701844Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-12, Volume: 55, Issue:13
Mitigating heterocycle metabolism in drug discovery.
AID212779Inhibitory activity against thromboxane A2 synthetase1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 28, Issue:10
Selective thromboxane synthetase inhibitors. 1. 1-[(Aryloxy)alkyl]-1H-imidazoles.
AID233501The pKa value was measured at N15 chemical shift changes due to protonation1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 36, Issue:23
Protonation of phosphoramide mustard and other phosphoramides.
AID1266401Binding affinity to cytochrome c peroxidase His175Gly mutant (unknown origin) assessed as equillibrium dissociation constant by Electron paramagnetic resonance spectra method2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-10, Volume: 58, Issue:23
New Frontiers in Druggability.
AID687185Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound at pH 11 to 12 by spectrophotometric analysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 55, Issue:11
Rational design of 4-aryl-1,2,3-triazoles for indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 inhibition.
AID25092Ionization constant (pKa)1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 34, Issue:7
Direct prediction of dissociation constants (pKa's) of clonidine-like imidazolines, 2-substituted imidazoles, and 1-methyl-2-substituted-imidazoles from 3D structures using a comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) approach.
AID26397Dissociation constant (pKa, calculated using GNN method)1997Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-19, Volume: 40, Issue:26
Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships from molecular similarity matrices and genetic neural networks. 2. Applications.
AID1543818Antiproliferative activity against human HL60 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 48 hrs by MTS assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 168Synthesis and antitumor activity of novel steroidal imidazolium salt derivatives.
AID497161Cytotoxicity against CHO cells after 48 hrs by MTT assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 18, Issue:16
Anti-Plasmodium activity of imidazolium and triazolium salts.
AID1802737Resonance Raman Assay from Article 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00041: \\Interaction of Azole-Based Environmental Pollutants with the Coelomic Hemoglobin from Amphitrite ornata: A Molecular Basis for Toxicity.\\2017Biochemistry, 05-02, Volume: 56, Issue:17
Interaction of Azole-Based Environmental Pollutants with the Coelomic Hemoglobin from Amphitrite ornata: A Molecular Basis for Toxicity.
AID1796111QC Inhibition Testing from Article 10.1021/bi051142e: \\Isolation, catalytic properties, and competitive inhibitors of the zinc-dependent murine glutaminyl cyclase.\\2005Biochemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 44, Issue:40
Isolation, catalytic properties, and competitive inhibitors of the zinc-dependent murine glutaminyl cyclase.
AID1796106QC Inhibition Testing from Article 10.1021/jm050756e: \\The first potent inhibitors for human glutaminyl cyclase: synthesis and structure-activity relationship.\\2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
The first potent inhibitors for human glutaminyl cyclase: synthesis and structure-activity relationship.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (2,355)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-1990421 (17.88)18.7374
1990's198 (8.41)18.2507
2000's539 (22.89)29.6817
2010's1000 (42.46)24.3611
2020's197 (8.37)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 92.87

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index92.87 (24.57)
Research Supply Index7.80 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.86 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index170.57 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (92.87)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials6 (0.25%)5.53%
Reviews71 (2.91%)6.00%
Case Studies9 (0.37%)4.05%
Observational1 (0.04%)0.25%
Other2,353 (96.43%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (37)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Efficacy Study of a y-Secretase Inhibitor, Nirogacestat (PF-03084014), in Children and Adolescents With Progressive, Surgically Unresectable Desmoid Tumors [NCT04195399]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-07Active, not recruiting
Adcetris (Brentuximab Vedotin), Substituting Vincristine in the OEPA/COPDac Regimen [Treatment Group 3 (TG3) of Euro-Net C1] With Involved Node Radiation Therapy for High Risk Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) [NCT01920932]Phase 277 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-12Active, not recruiting
A Pilot Trial of AVD and Brentuximab Vedotin (SGN-35) in the Treatment of Stage II-IV HIV-Associated Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT01771107]Phase 1/Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-07Active, not recruiting
Feasibility and Dose Discovery Analysis of Zoledronic Acid With Concurrent Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Osteosarcoma [NCT00742924]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Non Invasive Imaging of [18F]HX4 With Positron-Emission-Tomography (PET) in Cervix Cancer. [NCT02233387]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Terminated(stopped due to patients did not want to participate)
Effects of Dexmedetomidine vs Propofol on the Recordings of Deep Brain Activity (Local Field Potentials) Measured Through Implanted Stimulators [NCT02256319]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Phase II Randomized, Open-Label Study of IMC-1121B With or Without Dacarbazine in Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma [NCT00533702]Phase 2106 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Tinidazole Versus Cefazolin Antibiotic Prophylaxis of Vaginal and Abdominal Hysterectomy [NCT00787553]75 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase 3 Interim Response Adapted Trial Comparing Standard Therapy With Immuno-oncology Therapy for Children and Adults With Newly Diagnosed Stage I and II Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT05675410]Phase 31,875 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-11Recruiting
Study of GSK2132231A Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic in Association With Chemotherapy in Patients With Unresectable and Progressive Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma [NCT00849875]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-26Terminated(stopped due to Early end of trial notification after termination of long term follow up due to lack of scientific justification to continue collect information.)
Non-invasive Imaging of Tumor Hypoxia With [18F]HX4 Positron-Emission-Tomography (PET): A Phase II Trial [NCT02584400]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Terminated(stopped due to patients did not want to participate)
A Phase II Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study of the Safety and Efficacy of IMCgp100 Compared With Investigator Choice in HLA-A*0201 Positive Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Uveal Melanoma [NCT03070392]Phase 2378 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-16Active, not recruiting
Randomized Phase II Trial of Temozolomide Versus Hyd-Sulfate AZD6244 [NSC 748727] in Patients With Metastatic Uveal Melanoma [NCT01143402]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Rituximab With ABVD Versus Standard ABVD for Patients With Advanced-Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma With Poor Risk Features (IPS Score > 2) [NCT00654732]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-19Completed
A Phase II Randomized Study of the Effect of Zoledronic Acid Versus Observation on Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine in Women Who Elect to Undergo Surgery That Results in Removal of Both Ovaries [NCT00305695]Phase 2160 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-28Completed
A Pilot Trial of Adriamycin, Pembrolizumab, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine (APVD) for Patients With Untreated Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT03331341]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-09Active, not recruiting
A Phase III, Randomized Study of Nivolumab (Opdivo) Plus AVD or Brentuximab Vedotin (Adcetris) Plus AVD in Patients (Age >/= 12 Years) With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT03907488]Phase 3995 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-29Active, not recruiting
Understanding GRID Radiation Therapy Effects on Human Tumor Oxygenation and Interstitial Pressure to Increase Translation of Solid Tumor Therapy [NCT01967927]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study has been open for 8 years with no enrollment. Procedures in 2013 protocol are outdated. Cannot make the radiopharmaceutical on campus anymore.)
The Role of the Tumor Microenvironment of Pancreatic Cancer to Predict Treatment Outcome [NCT01989000]47 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
In Vivo Assessment of Hypoxia in Gastro-intestinal Cancer Using 18F-HX4-PET: an Optimization and Reproducibility Study [NCT01995084]32 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Phase I Trial to Determine Optimal Phase II Dose of the Oral Dual CAIX Inhibitor/ Radiosensitizer [NCT02216669]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to No financial agreement)
A Randomized Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy and 5FU or Capecitabine With and Without Zometa in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT03073785]Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-09-16Recruiting
A Double Blind, Randomized, Single Dose, Placebo Controlled Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Side Effects of the mGlu5 Antagonist Fenobam in Adult Healthy Volunteers [NCT01806415]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Assessment of Hypoxia in Malignant Gliomas Using EF5 [NCT00430079]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Administratively complete.)
The Detection of Tumor Hypoxia and Vascularity in Patients Undergoing Intraperitoneal Photodynamic Therapy [NCT00028782]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Administratively complete.)
A Pilot, Phase II , Open Label, Nonrandomized, Multi- Center Study of [F 18]HX4 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) to Detect Hypoxia in Tumors [NCT01075399]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Phase II Multi-Center Open-Label Trial of Six Doses of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy Prior to Limited Chemotherapy as Front-Line Therapy for Patients With Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma, Including Elderly Patients. [NCT06164275]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Trial of PET-Directed Therapy Using AVD (Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine) Plus Brentuximab Vedotin Induction Chemotherapy, With or Without Brentuximab Vedotin Plus Nivolumab, Followed by Nivolumab Consolidation for Patients With Previ [NCT03233347]Phase 282 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-10-13Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumor Hypoxia With 18F-Fluoromisonidazole, [18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) and [15O]Water (H215O) [NCT01246869]Phase 12 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-27Terminated(stopped due to PI retired, study closed)
Brentuximab Vedotin Plus AD in Non-bulky Limited Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT02505269]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-07Completed
Phase II Trial of Response-Adapted Therapy Based on Positron Emission Tomography (PET) for Bulky Stage I and II Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) [NCT01390584]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-24Terminated(stopped due to slow accrual)
A Randomized Phase III Trial of ABVD Versus Stanford V (+/-) Radiation Therapy in Locally Extensive and Advanced Stage Hodgkin's Disease [NCT00003389]Phase 3854 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-06-17Completed
Pediatric Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Consortium Study: cHOD17 [NCT03755804]Phase 2250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-12Recruiting
A Pilot Phase II Study of Pre-Operative Radiation Therapy and Thalidomide (IND 48832; NSC 66847) for Low Grade Primary Soft Tissue Sarcoma or Pre-Operative MAID/Thalidomide/Radiation Therapy for High/Intermediate Grade Primary Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the E [NCT00089544]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-17Terminated
A Phase 2 Front-Line PET/CT-2 Response-Adapted Brentuximab Vedotin and Nivolumab Incorporated and Radiation-Free Management of Early Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) [NCT03712202]Phase 2155 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-28Active, not recruiting
Randomized Phase II Study Comparing the MET Inhibitor Cabozantinib to Temozolomide/Dacarbazine in Ocular Melanoma [NCT01835145]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Phase II Study of PET-Directed Frontline Therapy With Pembrolizumab and AVD for Patients With Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT03226249]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-09Active, not recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00003389 (3) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival
NCT00003389 (3) [back to overview]Failure-free Survival at 5 Years
NCT00003389 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Second Cancers
NCT00089544 (1) [back to overview]Treatment Delivery With Compliance Defined as Receiving at Least 95% of the Pre-operative Protocol Dose of RT, All 3 Cycles of MAID (if Applicable), and Receive Thalidomide on 75% of the Days During Radiation
NCT00305695 (4) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density of the Total Hip as Measured by DEXA Scan on Left Hip
NCT00305695 (4) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine as Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan at 9 Months
NCT00305695 (4) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine as Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan at 18 Months
NCT00305695 (4) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density of the Total Hip as Measured by DEXA Scan on Right Hip
NCT00533702 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00533702 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)
NCT00533702 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00533702 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) [Overall Response Rate (ORR)]
NCT00533702 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) or Better (Disease Control Rate) at 12 Weeks
NCT00533702 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Response Rate) at 12 Weeks
NCT00533702 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) or Better (Disease Control Rate) at 6 Weeks
NCT00654732 (1) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) Rate
NCT00742924 (1) [back to overview]Limiting Toxicity
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypercalcemia (HCA) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Platelets(PLT) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Neutrophils (NEU) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Lymphopenia (LYM) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Leukocytes (LEU) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hyponatremia (hNA) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypokalemia (hKA) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypocalcemia(hCA) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypernatremia (HNA) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hyperkalemia (HKA) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypoalbuminemia(hAL) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Anti-MAGE-A3 Antibody Concentrations
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Concentrations of Antibodies Against Protein D (Anti-PD)
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Duration of Stable Disease (SD) Response to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients Reported With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Treatment Response for Anti-MAGE-A3 Antibodies
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Treatment Response for Anti-PD
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Seroconverted Patients for Melanoma Antigen (Anti-MAGE-A3)
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) by Gene Signature
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) After Slow Progressive Disease (SPD) by Gene Signature
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Gene Signature
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) for the Overall Population
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Stable Disease (SD) Response to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients Reported With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs) That Were Causally Related to Treatment Administration by Maximum Grade.
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Alkaline Phosphatase (ALK) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Bilirubine (BIL) Values by Maximum Grade.
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Creatinine (CREA) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (TTF), by Gene Signature
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hemoglobin (HGB) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Objective Tumor Response (OR) to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Mixed Response (MxR) to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and With AEs by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and With AEs by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Gamma-glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT01075399 (1) [back to overview]Reproducibility of [F18]HX4 PET Imaging in Measuring Hypoxia in Tumors
NCT01143402 (2) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (Evaluable Randomized Patients)
NCT01143402 (2) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Evaluable Randomized Patients)
NCT01390584 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT01390584 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who Are PET Negative After Induction Treatment
NCT01390584 (5) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) Rate After Induction Treatment
NCT01390584 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01390584 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival at 36 Months Among Patients Who Are PET Positive After Induction Treatment
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]CD4 Counts
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]2-year Overall Survival
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Maximal Tolerated Dose of Brentuximab Vedotin (Phase I)
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Incidence of Neurotoxicity
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Frequency of Adverse Events
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]2-year Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Characterization of Histologic Subtypes in HIV-HL in the HAART Era
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]CD8 Counts
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Viral Load
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Partial Response Rate
NCT01835145 (5) [back to overview]Confirmed Response Rate as Determined by the RECIST Criteria (Version 1.1)
NCT01835145 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01835145 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Grade 3+ Adverse Events Regardless of Attribution
NCT01835145 (5) [back to overview]PFS
NCT01835145 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Without a Progression Free Survival Event at 4 Months (PFS4)
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]To Assess the Patient Reported Symptoms and Health-related Quality of Life in Children With High Risk HL Compared to Those Treated on the Unfavorable HOD99 Treatment Arm (UR2) at Multiple Time Points. (PedsQL v.4.0)
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]To Assess the Patient Reported Symptoms and Health-related Quality of Life in Children With High Risk HL Compared to Those Treated on the Unfavorable HOD99 Treatment Arm (UR2) at Multiple Time Points. (PedsQL v.3.0)
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]To Assess the Patient Reported Symptoms and Health-related Quality of Life in Children With High Risk HL Compared to Those Treated on the Unfavorable HOD99 Treatment Arm (UR2) at Multiple Time Points. (PedsQL v.3.0)
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Descriptive of Neuropathic Adverse Events
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Descriptive of Infectious Adverse Events
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Descriptive of Hematological Adverse Events
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Initially Enrolled Patients That Have a Complete Response at Early Response Assessment Compared to Historical Control
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Initially Enrolled Patients That Have a Complete Response at Early Response Assessment Compared to Historical Control
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Local Failure Rate in High Risk HL Patients Treated With AEPA/CAPDac.
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate Estimate for All Evaluable Participants
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Comparison of the Event-free (EFS) Survival in High Risk HL Patients Treated With AEPA/CAPDac to the Historical Control HOD99 Unfavorable Risk 2 Arm (UR2).
NCT02505269 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT02505269 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT02505269 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade III and IV Adverse Events
NCT03070392 (7) [back to overview]Efficacy: Overall Survival
NCT03070392 (7) [back to overview]Efficacy: Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03070392 (7) [back to overview]Safety: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT03070392 (7) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Tebentafusp Concentration
NCT03070392 (7) [back to overview]Quality-of-Life: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status
NCT03070392 (7) [back to overview]Quality-of-life: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
NCT03070392 (7) [back to overview]Quality-of-Life: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D,5L Domain Scores
NCT03226249 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) With Pembrolizumab Treatment Alone
NCT03226249 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival at Treatment Completion
NCT03226249 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Treatment Completion

5-year Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or last known alive. The 5-year survival rate is the probability a patient survives 5 years. (NCT00003389)
Timeframe: Assessed every 2 months if patient is < 1 year from study entry, every 3 months for the second year, every 4 months for the third year, every 6 months for years 4 and 5, and yearly for 5 years

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Arm A (ABVD)0.88
Arm B (Stanford V)0.88

[back to top]

Failure-free Survival at 5 Years

"Failure-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to the earlier of progression/relapse or death. The 5-year failure-free survival is the probability a patient is failure-free and survives 5 years.~Progression is defined as an increase in size of 25% of the sum of the products of the pretreatment measurements or appearance of new lesions. Significant enlargement of the liver or spleen is evidence of progression. A significant increase in size is defined as > 2.0 cm in distance between costal margin and the inferior margin of either organ.~Relapse is defined as the re-appearance of any clinical evidence of Hodgkin's disease in a patient who has had a complete response. Relapse for partial responders is defined as progressive disease relative to disease status during the partial remission." (NCT00003389)
Timeframe: Assessed every 2 months if patient is < 1 year from study entry, every 3 months for the second year, every 4 months for the third year, every 6 months for years 4 and 5

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Arm A (ABVD)0.74
Arm B (Stanford V)0.71

[back to top]

Incidence of Second Cancers

Number of patients who developed second primary cancers (NCT00003389)
Timeframe: Assessed every 2 months if patient is < 1 year from study entry, every 3 months for the second year, every 4 months for the third year, every 6 months for years 4 and 5, and yearly for 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm A (ABVD)15
Arm B (Stanford V)19

[back to top]

Treatment Delivery With Compliance Defined as Receiving at Least 95% of the Pre-operative Protocol Dose of RT, All 3 Cycles of MAID (if Applicable), and Receive Thalidomide on 75% of the Days During Radiation

Was to be estimated using a binomial distribution and accompanied by the associated 95% confidence interval. Due to early study closure, this endpoint could not be fully evaluated per the protocol plan. (NCT00089544)
Timeframe: Duration of treatment (which can continue up to approximately 15 months).

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Not CompliantCompliant
Cohort A (Chemotherapy, Radiation, Thalidomide, Surgery)510
Cohort B (Thalidomide, Radiation, Surgery)25

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density of the Total Hip as Measured by DEXA Scan on Left Hip

To compare the effect of zoledronic acid on the change in BMD of the left hip following treatment, evaluated by measuring the change from baseline to 18 months (NCT00305695)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventiong/cm2 (Mean)
Arm I (Zoledroic Acid)-0.003
Arm II (Clinical Observation)-0.058

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine as Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan at 9 Months

To compare the effect of zoledronic acid administered every 6 months on bone loss associated with surgery (at a minimum, any surgical procedure that results in removal of both ovaries), as compared with observation alone. This is to be evaluated by measuring the change from baseline to 9 months in bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, specifically L1-L4 dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). (NCT00305695)
Timeframe: 9 Months

Interventiong/cm2 (Mean)
Arm I (Zoledroic Acid)-0.025
Arm II (Clinical Observation)-0.086

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine as Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan at 18 Months

To compare the effect of zoledronic acid administered every 6 months on bone loss associated with surgery (at a minimum, any surgical procedure that results in removal of both ovaries), as compared with observation alone. This is to be evaluated by measuring the change from baseline to 18 months in bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, specifically L1-L4 dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). (NCT00305695)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventiong/cm2 (Mean)
Arm I (Zoledroic Acid)-0.001
Arm II (Clinical Observation)-0.094

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density of the Total Hip as Measured by DEXA Scan on Right Hip

To compare the effect of zoledronic acid on the change in BMD of the right hip following treatment, evaluated by measuring the change from baseline to 18 months (NCT00305695)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventiong/cm2 (Mean)
Arm I (Zoledroic Acid)0.101
Arm II (Clinical Observation)-0.052

[back to top]

Duration of Response

The duration of overall response was defined as the time from first assessment of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the first date of progressive disease (PD) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0), initiation of other or additional antitumor therapy, or death from any cause. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as having at least a 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. CR and PR had to be confirmed by repeat assessments and performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. PD was defined as at least 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. Participants who did not relapse were censored at the day of their last objective tumor assessment. (NCT00533702)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (of 21-day cycle) up to 17.1 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Dacarbazine11.0
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)NA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)

The number of participants who experienced any IMC-1121B (ramucirumab [RAM]) treatment-related and treatment emergent AE (TEAE), treatment-related TEAE of Grade ≥3, treatment-related TE serious AEs (SAEs), treatment-related TEAE resulting in death (Grade 5 AE) and any TEAEs resulting in death. A summary of SAEs and all other non-serious AEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT00533702)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 40 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any RAM related TEAERAM related SAERAM related ≥ Grade 3 AERAM related deathRAM related TEAE leading to discontinuation of RAMAny AE with outcome of death
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)40513142
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Dacarbazine43920132

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the first day of therapy to the first evidence of disease progression as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0) or death from any cause. Progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of the target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started in comparison with the measurement of the nadir or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. In addition, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions was considered PD. New or existing pleural effusion/ascites required cytological confirmation for PD according to the protocol. Participants who did not progress and who were alive or did not have documented progression or missed ≥2 visits, or had no post baseline assessment were censored at the day of their last tumor assessment. (NCT00533702)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Dacarbazine2.6
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)1.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) [Overall Response Rate (ORR)]

The ORR was defined as the percentage of all randomized participants with the best overall response of PR or CR using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. CR and PR had to be confirmed by repeat assessments and performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. (NCT00533702)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (of 21-day cycle) up to 17.1 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Dacarbazine17.3
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)4.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) or Better (Disease Control Rate) at 12 Weeks

Disease Control Rate (DCR) was defined as complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR) plus SD using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and the normalization of non-target lesion tumor marker levels. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease from baseline in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. CR and PR had to be confirmed by repeat assessments and performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Stable Disease (SD) was defined as: neither sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD) nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters recorded since treatment began. PD was defined as at least 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. (NCT00533702)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (4 cycles of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Dacarbazine40
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)24

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Response Rate) at 12 Weeks

Response rate was defined as a CR or a PR using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and the normalization of non-target lesion tumor marker levels. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease from baseline in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. CR and PR had to be confirmed by repeat assessments and performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. (NCT00533702)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (4 cycles of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Dacarbazine13.5
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)4.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) or Better (Disease Control Rate) at 6 Weeks

Disease Control Rate (DCR) was defined as complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR) plus SD using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and the normalization of non-target lesion tumor marker levels. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease from baseline in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. CR and PR had to be confirmed by repeat assessments and performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. SD was defined as: neither sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD) nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters recorded since treatment began. PD was defined as at least 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. (NCT00533702)
Timeframe: 6 weeks (2 cycles of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Dacarbazine54
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)44

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) Rate

EFS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test will be performed to test the difference in time-to-event distributions between patient groups. Cox proportional hazards model will be utilized to include multiple covariates in the time-to-event analysis. Logistic regression will be utilized to assess the effect of patient prognostic factors on the response rate. (NCT00654732)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RABVD17
ABVD20

[back to top]

Limiting Toxicity

"The occurrence of Limiting Toxicity defined as Any CTC AE version 4 Grade 3 and 4 non-hematologic toxicity thought to be possibly, probably or definitely related to zoledronic acid with the specific exclusion of:~Grade 3 nausea and vomiting controlled with adequate antiemetic prophylaxis.~Grade 3 transaminase (AST/ALT) that occurs during the evaluation period but resolves to ≤ Grade 2, before the planned dose of therapy after definitive surgery.~Grade 3 fever or infection.~Grade 3 or 4 hypocalcemia (see Section 5.1.1)~Grade 3 mucositis.~Grade 3 fatigue that returns to ≤ Grade 2, before the planned dose of therapy after definitive surgery.~Grade 3 joint range of motion, decreased or joint effusion that is related to the primary tumor." (NCT00742924)
Timeframe: Enrollment through the first 12 weeks of therapy.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm 1- Chemotherapy and 1.2 mg/m2 Zoledronic Acid1
Arm 2 - Chemotherapy and 2.3 mg/m2 Zoledronic Acid1
Arm 3 - Chemotherapy and 3.5 mg/m2 Zoledronic Acid3
Chemotherapy and 2.3 mg/m2 Zoledronic Acid After MTD2

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypercalcemia (HCA) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards HCA laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Unknown (UNK), Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
HCA - SCR UNK; SE G0HCA - SCR UNK; SE G1HCA - SCR UNK; SE G2HCA - SCR UNK; SE G3HCA - SCR UNK; SE G4HCA - SCR UNK; SE UNKHCA - SCR G0; SE G0HCA - SCR G0; SE G1HCA - SCR G0; SE G2HCA - SCR G0; SE G3HCA - SCR G0; SE G4HCA - SCR G0; SE UNKHCA - SCR G1; SE G1HCA - SCR G1; SE G2HCA - SCR G1; SE G3HCA - SCR G1; SE G4HCA - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP210000370000611000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Platelets(PLT) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards PLT laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
PLT - SCR G0; SE G0PLT - SCR G0; SE G1PLT - SCR G0; SE G2PLT - SCR G0; SE G3PLT - SCR G0; SE G4PLT - SCR G0; SE UNKPLT - SCR G1; SE G0PLT - SCR G1; SE G1PLT - SCR G1; SE G2PLT - SCR G1; SE G3PLT - SCR G1; SE G4PLT - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP3951002100000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards PTT laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
PTT - SCR G0; SE G0PTT - SCR G0; SE G1PTT - SCR G0; SE G2PTT - SCR G0; SE G3PTT - SCR G0; SE G4PTT - SCR G0; SE UNKPTT - SCR G1; SE G0PTT - SCR G1; SE G1PTT - SCR G1; SE G2PTT - SCR G1; SE G3PTT - SCR G1; SE G4PTT - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP3530107010100

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Neutrophils (NEU) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards NEU laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0). CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
NEU - SCR G0; SE G0NEU - SCR G0; SE G1NEU - SCR G0; SE G2NEU - SCR G0; SE G3NEU - SCR G0; SE G4NEU - SCR G0; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP3941202

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Lymphopenia (LYM) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards LYM laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
LYM - SCR G0; SE G0LYM - SCR G0; SE G1LYM - SCR G0; SE G2LYM - SCR G0; SE G3LYM - SCR G0; SE G4LYM - SCR G0; SE UNKLYM - SCR G1; SE G0LYM - SCR G1; SE G1LYM - SCR G1; SE G2LYM - SCR G1; SE G3LYM - SCR G1; SE G4LYM - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP18136002243000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Leukocytes (LEU) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards LEU laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
LEU - SCR G0; SE G0LEU - SCR G0; SE G1LEU - SCR G0; SE G2LEU - SCR G0; SE G3LEU - SCR G0; SE G4LEU - SCR G0; SE UNKLEU - SCR G1; SE G0LEU - SCR G1; SE G1LEU - SCR G1; SE G2LEU - SCR G1; SE G3LEU - SCR G1; SE G4LEU - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP3760102011000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hyponatremia (hNA) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards hNA laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
hNA - SCR G0; SE G0hNA - SCR G0; SE G1hNA - SCR G0; SE G2hNA - SCR G0; SE G3hNA - SCR G0; SE G4hNA - SCR G0; SE UNKhNA - SCR G1; SE G0hNA - SCR G1; SE G1hNA - SCR G1; SE G2hNA - SCR G1; SE G3hNA - SCR G1; SE G4hNA - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP33100102110000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypokalemia (hKA) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards hKA laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
hKA - SCR G0; SE G0hKA - SCR G0; SE G1hKA - SCR G0; SE G2hKA - SCR G0; SE G3hKA - SCR G0; SE G4hKA - SCR G0; SE UNKhKA - SCR G1; SE G0hKA - SCR G1; SE G1hKA - SCR G1; SE G2hKA - SCR G1; SE G3hKA - SCR G1; SE G4hKA - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP4210001300001

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypocalcemia(hCA) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards hCA laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Unknown (UNK), Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
hCA - SCR UNK; SE G0hCA - SCR UNK; SE G1hCA - SCR UNK; SE G2hCA - SCR UNK; SE G3hCA - SCR UNK; SE G4hCA - SCR UNK; SE UNKhCA - SCR G0; SE G0hCA - SCR G0; SE G1hCA - SCR G0; SE G2hCA - SCR G0; SE G3hCA - SCR G0; SE G4hCA - SCR G0; SE UNKhCA - SCR G1; SE G0hCA - SCR G1; SE G1hCA - SCR G1; SE G2hCA - SCR G1; SE G3hCA - SCR G1; SE G4hCA - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP1100102770005050001

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypernatremia (HNA) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards HNA laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
HNA - SCR G0; SE G0HNA - SCR G0; SE G1HNA - SCR G0; SE G2HNA - SCR G0; SE G3HNA - SCR G0; SE G4HNA - SCR G0; SE UNKHNA - SCR G1; SE G0HNA - SCR G1; SE G1HNA - SCR G1; SE G2HNA - SCR G1; SE G3HNA - SCR G1; SE G4HNA - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP4400002200000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hyperkalemia (HKA) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards HKA laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0), G1 and G2. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
HKA - SCR G0; SE G0HKA - SCR G0; SE G1HKA - SCR G0; SE G2HKA - SCR G0; SE G3HKA - SCR G0; SE G4HKA - SCR G0; SE UNKHKA - SCR G1; SE G0HKA - SCR G1; SE G1HKA - SCR G1; SE G2HKA - SCR G1; SE G3HKA - SCR G1; SE G4HKA - SCR G1; SE UNKHKA - SCR G2; SE G0HKA - SCR G2; SE G1HKA - SCR G2; SE G2HKA - SCR G2; SE G3HKA - SCR G2; SE G4HKA - SCR G2; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP4220001100001100000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypoalbuminemia(hAL) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards hAL laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Unknown (UNK), Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
hAL - SCR UNK; SE G0hAL - SCR UNK; SE G1hAL - SCR UNK; SE G2hAL - SCR UNK; SE G3hAL - SCR UNK; SE G4hAL - SCR UNK; SE UNKhAL - SCR G0; SE G0hAL - SCR G0; SE G1hAL - SCR G0; SE G2hAL - SCR G0; SE G3hAL - SCR G0; SE G4hAL - SCR G0; SE UNKhAL - SCR G1; SE G1hAL - SCR G1; SE G2hAL - SCR G1; SE G3hAL - SCR G1; SE G4hAL - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP101001264200443002

[back to top]

Anti-MAGE-A3 Antibody Concentrations

Anti-MAGE-A3 antibody concentrations were presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMTs) and expressed in ELISA units per millilitre (EL.U/mL) (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: Post Dose 4 at Week 13 (W13).

InterventionEL.U/mL (Geometric Mean)
GSK2132231A GROUP2778.7
GSK2132231A GS+ Group2650.8
GSK2132231A GS- Group4046.9
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group336.0

[back to top]

Concentrations of Antibodies Against Protein D (Anti-PD)

Anti-PD antibody concentrations were presented ad geometric mean concentrations (GMTs) and expressed in ELISA units per millilitre (EL.U/mL). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: Post Dose 4 at Week 13 (W13).

InterventionEL.U/mL (Geometric Mean)
GSK2132231A GROUP9979.6
GSK2132231A GS+ Group10437
GSK2132231A GS- Group10853.6
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group2176

[back to top]

Duration of Stable Disease (SD) Response to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment

Assessment was done based on a set of MLs identified at baseline as TLs and NTLs followed up until disease progression. Stable disease was defined as follows: 1) In case of target lesions (TL) greater than or equal to (≥) 20 mm: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for Partial Response nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progressive Disease, taking as references the sum of Longest Diameter (LD) of TL recorded previously but not necessarily at baseline; 2) In case of TL both less than 20 mm and ≥ 20 mm: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify as a PR nor sufficient increase to qualify as PD, taking as references the smallest sum LD since the start of the treatment. The minimal time interval required between 2 measurements for determination of SD was at least 12 weeks. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2132231A GS+ Group5.6
GSK2132231A GS- Group7.7
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group5.1

[back to top]

Number of Patients Reported With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Serious adverse events (SAEs) assessed include medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity. Events which were part of the natural course of the disease under study (i.e., disease progression, recurrence) were captured as part of the clinical activity outcome variables in this study; therefore these did not need to be reported as SAEs. Progression/recurrence of the tumor in a patient was recorded as part of the clinical assessment data collection, and deaths due to progressive disease was recorded on a specific form, but not as an SAE. However, if the investigator considered that there was a causal relationship between treatment or protocol design/procedures and the disease progression/recurrence, then the event was reported as an SAE. Any new primary cancer (non-related to the cancer under study) was reported as an SAE. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study period, up to 5 years

InterventionPatients (Number)
GSK2132231A GROUP10

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Treatment Response for Anti-MAGE-A3 Antibodies

Treatment response defined as: For initially seronegative patients: post-administration antibody concentration ≥ 27 EL.U/mL For initially seropositive patients: post-administration antibody concentration ≥ 2 fold the pre-vaccination antibody concentration (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: Post Dose 4 at Week 13 (W13).

InterventionPatients (Number)
GSK2132231A GROUP28
GSK2132231A GS+ Group19
GSK2132231A GS- Group8
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Treatment Response for Anti-PD

Treatment response defined as: For initially seronegative patients: post-administration antibody concentration ≥ 100 EL.U/mL For initially seropositive patients: post-administration antibody concentration ≥ 2 fold the pre-vaccination antibody concentration (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: Post Dose 4 at Week 13 (W13).

InterventionPatients (Number)
GSK2132231A GROUP28
GSK2132231A GS+ Group19
GSK2132231A GS- Group8
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group1

[back to top]

Number of Seroconverted Patients for Melanoma Antigen (Anti-MAGE-A3)

Seroconversion was defined as a concentration of antibodies assessed that was greater than the cut-off value for a patient whose concentration of such antibodies was below the cut-off level before the initiation of treatment. Seroconverted patients were those patients with anti-MAGE-A3 antibody concentrations ≥ 27. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: Post Dose 4 at Week 13 (W13).

InterventionPatients (Number)
GSK2132231A GROUP28
GSK2132231A GS+ Group19
GSK2132231A GS- Group8
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) by Gene Signature

OS was defined as the time from first treatment to the date of death. OS analysis was performed using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. Each patient was censored out at the time of death. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2132231A GROUP9.4
GSK2132231A GS+ Group11.4
GSK2132231A GS- Group5.3
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) After Slow Progressive Disease (SPD) by Gene Signature

PFS after initial SPD was defined and calculated as the time from the time point at which the disease was the most advanced during the treatment to either a new progression of the disease or the date to death, whichever occurred first as another secondary outcome of this study. In that case, the largest diameter during the course of treatment was to be used as reference measurement. This outcome was defined to take into account the delay to induce an active immune response and the strict rules set up in this study to allow pursuing investigational treatment in case of SPD. PFS after SPD analysis was performed using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2132231A GS+ Group2.8
GSK2132231A GS- Group2.8
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group5.1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Gene Signature

PFS was defined and calculated as the time from first treatment to either the first progression of the disease or the date of death, whichever occurred first. In case a patient went off protocol treatment, the date of first documented progression (if applicable) was to be used as date of progression. Patients still alive with no evidence of disease progression at the time of their last visit or for whom date of first documented progression was not applicable, were censored at the time of the last examination. PFS analysis was performed using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2132231A GROUP2.8
GSK2132231A GS+ Group2.8
GSK2132231A GS- Group2.8
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group5.1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) for the Overall Population

PFS was defined and calculated as the time from first treatment to either the first progression of the disease or the date of death, whichever occurred first. In case a patient went off protocol treatment, the date of first documented progression (if applicable) was to be used as date of progression. Patients still alive with no evidence of disease progression at the time of their last visit or for whom date of first documented progression was not applicable, were censored at the time of the last examination. PFS analysis was performed using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2132231A GROUP2.8

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Stable Disease (SD) Response to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment

Assessment was done based on a set of MLs identified at baseline as TLs and NTLs followed up until disease progression. TLs and NTLs were assessed as regards matching or not SD-related definitions, 1) SD definitions per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria for TLs >= 20 mm and TLs both >= and < 20 mm: a) for TLs: SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify as a PR nor sufficient increase to qualify as PD, taking as references the smallest sum LD since treatment start. and b) for NTLs: SD = Persistence of one or more NTL; 2) following below criteria for TLs < 20mm e. a. a) for TLs: PR/SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR nor sufficient increase, to qualify for PD taking as references the smallest sum LD since treatment start, and b) for NTLs: PR/SD = Persistence of one or more NTL. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

,,,
Interventionpatients (Number)
SDSD/PR
GSK2132231A GROUP50
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group10
GSK2132231A GS- Group00
GSK2132231A GS+ Group40

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards ALT laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0), G1 and G2. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
ALT - SCR G0; SE G0ALT - SCR G0; SE G1ALT - SCR G0; SE G2ALT - SCR G0; SE G3ALT - SCR G0; SE G4ALT - SCR G0; SE UNKALT - SCR G1; SE G0ALT - SCR G1; SE G1ALT - SCR G1; SE G2ALT - SCR G1; SE G3ALT - SCR G1; SE G4ALT - SCR G1; SE UNKALT - SCR G2; SE G0ALT - SCR G2; SE G1ALT - SCR G2; SE G2ALT - SCR G2; SE G3ALT - SCR G2; SE G4ALT - SCR G2; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP3431101321001010000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Alkaline Phosphatase (ALK) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards ALK laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end(SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
ALK - SCR G0; SE G0ALK - SCR G0; SE G1ALK - SCR G0; SE G2ALK - SCR G0; SE G3ALK - SCR G0; SE G4ALK - SCR G0; SE UNKALK - SCR G1; SE G0ALK - SCR G1; SE G1ALK - SCR G1; SE G2ALK - SCR G1; SE G3ALK - SCR G1; SE G4ALK - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP31110001130001

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards AST laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
AST - SCR G0; SE G0AST - SCR G0; SE G1AST - SCR G0; SE G2AST - SCR G0; SE G3AST - SCR G0; SE G4AST - SCR G0; SE UNKAST - SCR G1; SE G0AST - SCR G1; SE G1AST - SCR G1; SE G2AST - SCR G1; SE G3AST - SCR G1; SE G4AST - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP3621011231001

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Bilirubine (BIL) Values by Maximum Grade.

The status of each patient as regards BIL laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Unknown (UNK) and Grade 0 (G0). CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
BIL - SCR UNK; SE G0BIL - SCR UNK; SE G1BIL - SCR UNK; SE G2BIL - SCR UNK; SE G3BIL - SCR UNK; SE G4BIL - SCR UNK; SE UNKBIL - SCR G0; SE G0BIL - SCR G0; SE G1BIL - SCR G0; SE G2BIL - SCR G0; SE G3BIL - SCR G0; SE G4BIL - SCR G0; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP1000003930005

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Creatinine (CREA) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards CREA laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end(SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0). CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
CREA - SCR G0; SE G0CREA - SCR G0; SE G1CREA - SCR G0; SE G2CREA - SCR G0; SE G3CREA - SCR G0; SE G4CREA - SCR G0; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP4041012

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF), by Gene Signature

TTF was defined as withdrawal from treatment with the MAGE-A3 ASCI study product due to disease progression or death. TTF analysis was performed using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2132231A GS+ Group2.8
GSK2132231A GS- Group2.3
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group4.3

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hemoglobin (HGB) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards HGB laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
HGB - SCR G0; SE G0HGB - SCR G0; SE G1HGB - SCR G0; SE G2HGB - SCR G0; SE G3HGB - SCR G0; SE G4HGB - SCR G0; SE UNKHGB - SCR G1; SE G0HGB - SCR G1; SE G1HGB - SCR G1; SE G2HGB - SCR G1; SE G3HGB - SCR G1; SE G4HGB - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP22145102220000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Objective Tumor Response (OR) to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment

Response assessment was done based on a set of measurable lesions (MLs) identified at baseline as target lesions (TLs), and followed up until disease progression. Up to 5 MLs per organ & 10 in total were identified as TLs and measured at baseline, selected based on size (those with the longest diameter [LD]) and measurability; a sum of LDs for all TLs was calculated and reported as baseline sum LD, which was used to characterize objective tumor response (OR), OR being defined as either complete response (CR) and/or partial response (PR) post MAGE-A3 ASCI treatment. After identification, MLs and TLs were assessed as regards CR and PR definitions per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria: CR = Disappearance of all extranodal target lesions. All pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to <10 mm in short axis; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the SLD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

,,,
Interventionpatients (Number)
ORCRPR
GSK2132231A GROUP413
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group000
GSK2132231A GS- Group000
GSK2132231A GS+ Group413

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Mixed Response (MxR) to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment

Assessment was done based on a set of MLs identified at baseline as TLs and NTLs followed up until disease progression. MLs were assessed as regards matching below MxR definitions. In case of evaluability per RECIST: a) MxR Type 1= at least (a.l.) 30% decrease in LD in a.l. one TL measured at baseline. Such response occurring in SD/PD status of LD of TL and without appearance of one or more new lesions = SD/PD with TL regression; b) MxR Type 2: appearance of one or more new lesions occurring in SD/PR status of LD of TL, and = SD/PR with new lesion. In case of non-evaluability per RECIST: a) MxR Type 1 = a clear decrease in diameters occurring in a.l. one TL measured at baseline. Such response occurring in SD/PD status of LD of (baseline) TL and without appearance of one or more new lesions = SD/PD with TL regression; b) MxR Type 2 = appearance of one or more new lesions occurring in SD/PR status of LD of TL = SD/PR with new lesion. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

,,,
InterventionPatients (Number)
MxR: SD/PR with new lesionMxR: SD/PD with target lesion regression
GSK2132231A GROUP101
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group00
GSK2132231A GS- Group41
GSK2132231A GS+ Group60

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and With AEs by Maximum Grade

SAEs include medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a patient, is a Grade 4 AE according to the CTCAE, version3.0. Events which were part of the natural course of the disease under study were captured as part of the clinical activity outcome variables in this study; therefore did not need to be reported as SAEs. Progression/recurrence of the tumor was recorded as part of the clinical assessment data collection, and deaths due to progressive disease was recorded on a specific form, but not as an SAE. SAEs reported are here below tabulated irrespective of grade (any), as well as graded by maximum grade reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. Maximum grade reported and tabulated were Grade 1 (G1), G2, G3, G4 and G5. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: Within the 31-day follow-up period post treatment administration.

InterventionSubjects (Number)
Patients with any SAEsPatients with G1 SAEsPatients with G2 SAEsPatients with G3 SAEsPatients with G4 SAEsPatients with G5 SAEs
GSK2132231A GROUP1012520

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and With AEs by Maximum Grade

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs reported are here below tabulated irrespective of grade (any), as well as graded by maximum grade reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. Maximum grade reported and tabulated were Grade 1 (G1), G2, G3, G4 and G5. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: Within the 31-day follow-up period post treatment administration.

InterventionSubjects (Number)
Patients with any AEsPatients with G1 AEsPatients with G2 AEsPatients with G3 AEsPatients with G4 AEsPatients with G5 AEs
GSK2132231A GROUP4814191230

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Gamma-glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards GGT laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end(SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0), G1 and G3. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
GGT - SCR G0; SE G0GGT - SCR G0; SE G1GGT - SCR G0; SE G2GGT - SCR G0; SE G3GGT - SCR G0; SE G4GGT - SCR G0; SE UNKGGT - SCR G1; SE G0GGT - SCR G1; SE G1GGT - SCR G1; SE G2GGT - SCR G1; SE G3GGT - SCR G1; SE G4GGT - SCR G1; SE UNKGGT - SCR G3; SE G0GGT - SCR G3; SE G1GGT - SCR G3; SE G2GGT - SCR G3; SE G3GGT - SCR G3; SE G4GGT - SCR G3; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP20114002220000000100

[back to top]

Reproducibility of [F18]HX4 PET Imaging in Measuring Hypoxia in Tumors

Primary tumor uptake of [F 18]HX4 was measured on PET images by onsite radiologist or nuclear medicine physician for 1st and 2nd PET scans. Values measured were: SUV (Standard Uptake Value), SUV Max (Maximum standard uptake value), SUV Mean (Mean standard uptake value), and T/B ratio (Tumor to background ratio). Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated for each of the parameter. (NCT01075399)
Timeframe: Time between 1st and 2nd scan was 1 to 6 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Subjects That Received 1st and 2nd [F18] HX4 Scans39

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (Evaluable Randomized Patients)

The primary analysis will be performed among the Gnaq/Gna11 mutant patients. A stratified logrank test will be performed stratified by mutation status, M stage, and number of prior systemic therapies for metastatic disease. Due to the potential for a large number of strata and small strata sizes, the standard asymptotic stratified logrank test will be verified for robustness utilizing a permutation reference distribution. (NCT01143402)
Timeframe: The time from randomization to death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm I (Temozolomide)9.1
Arm II (Selumetinib)11.8

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Evaluable Randomized Patients)

The primary analysis will be performed among the Gnaq/Gna11 mutant patients. A stratified logrank test will be performed stratified by mutation status, M stage, and number of prior systemic therapies for metastatic disease. Due to the potential for a large number of strata and small strata sizes, the standard asymptotic stratified logrank test will be verified for robustness utilizing a permutation reference distribution. (NCT01143402)
Timeframe: The time from randomization to the earlier date of objective disease progression per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria or death due to any cause in the absence of progression, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionweeks (Median)
Arm I (Temozolomide)7
Arm II (Selumetinib)15.9

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Rate

Progression-free survival is defined as the time from study entry to lymphoma progression or death from any cause. Proportion of patients who are progression-free and alive at 36 months will be reported. Progression is defined as appearance of any new lesions more than 1.5 cm in any axis, at least a 50% increase from nadir in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or at least 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis. (NCT01390584)
Timeframe: Assessed at 36 months

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
ABVD + INRTNA
ABVD + BEACOPP + INRTNA

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who Are PET Negative After Induction Treatment

(NCT01390584)
Timeframe: Assessed at end of Cycle 2

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Step 1: Induction Tx0.8

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR) Rate After Induction Treatment

Complete response (CR) is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy. (NCT01390584)
Timeframe: Assessed at end of Cycle 2

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Step 1: Induction Tx1.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive. (NCT01390584)
Timeframe: Assessed at 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
ABVD + INRTNA
ABVD + BEACOPP + INRTNA

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival at 36 Months Among Patients Who Are PET Positive After Induction Treatment

Progression-free survival is defined as the time from study entry to lymphoma progression or death from any cause. Proportion of patients who are progression-free and alive at 36 months will be reported. Progression is defined as appearance of any new lesions more than 1.5 cm in any axis, at least a 50% increase from nadir in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or at least 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis. (NCT01390584)
Timeframe: Assessed at 36 months

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
ABVD + BEACOPP + INRTNA

[back to top]

CD4 Counts

CD4 counts (absolute) at visit 4 (cycle 5) (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 5 months

Interventioncells/µL (Median)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg378
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg401

[back to top]

2-year Overall Survival

Proportion of study participants who are alive at 2 years estimated using the Kaplan-Meier survival function (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg1.0
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg0.91

[back to top]

Maximal Tolerated Dose of Brentuximab Vedotin (Phase I)

Defined as the dose level at which =< 1 of 6 subjects experience dose limiting toxicity. (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionmg/kg (Number)
Treatment (Brentuximab and Combination Chemotherapy)1.2

[back to top]

Incidence of Neurotoxicity

Number of participants who experience neurotoxicity at cycle 5 (visit 4) (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 5 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg4
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg23

[back to top]

Frequency of Adverse Events

Number of Participants who had one or more adverse events (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg6
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg35

[back to top]

2-year Progression-free Survival (PFS)

2-year PFS is determined based on the Kaplan-Meier estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals based on standard errors using Greenwood's formula. (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg1.0
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg0.84

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Proportion of participants who are alive and progression-free at 2 years (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg1.0
Phase II Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg0.84

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

Number of participants who experienced a complete response per RECIST v1.0 criteria (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg6
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg32

[back to top]

Characterization of Histologic Subtypes in HIV-HL in the HAART Era

Participants with mixed cellularity histologic subtype (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg2
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg13

[back to top]

CD8 Counts

Absolute CD8 counts at cycle 5 (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 5 months

Interventioncells/µL (Median)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg719.5
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg666.5

[back to top]

Viral Load

HIV viral load (detectable) (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 5 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg1
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg7

[back to top]

Partial Response Rate

Number of participants who achieved a partial response per RECIST v1.0 criteria (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg1
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg4

[back to top]

Confirmed Response Rate as Determined by the RECIST Criteria (Version 1.1)

The confirmed response rates will be estimated by dividing the number of confirmed responders by the number of evaluable patients. 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT01835145)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Cabozantinib-s-malate)0
Arm II (Temozolomide or Dacarbazine)0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

The distribution of OS time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan Meier. (NCT01835145)
Timeframe: Number of days from registration until death, assessed up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Cabozantinib-s-malate)6.3
Arm II (Temozolomide or Dacarbazine)7.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Grade 3+ Adverse Events Regardless of Attribution

percentage of patients who experienced grade 3+ adverse events regardless of attribution, graded according to the National Cancer Institute CTCAE version 4.0 (NCT01835145)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm I (Cabozantinib-s-malate)51.6
Arm II (Temozolomide or Dacarbazine)20

[back to top]

PFS

The distribution of PFS time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan Meier and is defined as the number of days from registration until disease progression (or death). Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression. (NCT01835145)
Timeframe: Number of days from registration until disease progression (or death), assessed up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Cabozantinib-s-malate)2.0
Arm II (Temozolomide or Dacarbazine)1.9

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Without a Progression Free Survival Event at 4 Months (PFS4)

A patient will be declared a PFS4 success if they are on study and progression free for at least 4 months. Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression. The success for each arm will be calculated independently as the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. A one-sided chi-squared test for a difference in PFS4 proportions will be used to test for a difference between arms. (NCT01835145)
Timeframe: At 4 months

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm I (Cabozantinib-s-malate).323
Arm II (Temozolomide or Dacarbazine).267

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Descriptive of Neuropathic Adverse Events

To describe acute hematologic, neuropathic, and infectious toxicities as they relate to transfusion requirements, growth factor support, episodes of febrile neutropenia and hospitalizations, according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: From enrollment to end of therapy (approximately 8 months)

,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Peripheral sensory neuropathyPain in extremityNeuralgiaPain NOS
Cycle 1 - Grade 20311
Cycle 1 - Grade 3-40100
Cycle 2 - Grade 21401
Cycle 2 - Grade 3-40000
Cycle 3 - Grade 22100
Cycle 3 - Grade 3-40000
Cycle 4 - Grade 23100
Cycle 4 - Grade 3-40000
Cycle 5 - Grade 21210
Cycle 5 - Grade 3-40000
Cycle 6 - Grade 21001
Cycle 6 - Grade 3-40001

[back to top]

Descriptive of Infectious Adverse Events

To describe acute hematologic, neuropathic, and infectious toxicities as they relate to transfusion requirements, growth factor support, episodes of febrile neutropenia and hospitalizations, according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: From enrollment to end of therapy (approximately 8 months)

,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Febrile neutropeniaMucositisUpper respiratory infectionGenitourinary infection
Cycle 1 - Grade 201051
Cycle 1 - Grade 3-46220
Cycle 2 - Grade 20631
Cycle 2 - Grade 3-43400
Cycle 3 - Grade 20002
Cycle 3 - Grade 3-40000
Cycle 4 - Grade 20101
Cycle 4 - Grade 3-42020
Cycle 5 - Grade 20102
Cycle 5 - Grade 3-41000
Cycle 6 - Grade 20100
Cycle 6 - Grade 3-40000

[back to top]

Descriptive of Hematological Adverse Events

To describe acute hematologic, neuropathic, and infectious toxicities as they relate to transfusion requirements, growth factor support, episodes of febrile neutropenia and hospitalizations, according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: From enrollment to end of therapy (approximately 8 months)

,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
LeukopeniaNeutropeniaLymphopeniaAnemiaThrombocytopenia
Cycle 1 - Grade 215515233
Cycle 1 - Grade 3-4496236123
Cycle 2 - Grade 2281318282
Cycle 2 - Grade 3-423511551
Cycle 3 - Grade 287960
Cycle 3 - Grade 3-4410712
Cycle 4 - Grade 2551660
Cycle 4 - Grade 3-4531501
Cycle 5 - Grade 2741340
Cycle 5 - Grade 3-4232211
Cycle 6 - Grade 21482021
Cycle 6 - Grade 3-4563112

[back to top]

Percentage of Initially Enrolled Patients That Have a Complete Response at Early Response Assessment Compared to Historical Control

To determine the efficacy of 2 cycles of AEPA chemotherapy, the response rate for the first 32 evaluable participants enrolled was evaluated. If it shown efficacy (detect 20% increase complete rate with 80% power and 5% type I error compared with the proportion of historical control of HOD99 unfavorable risk patients had complete rate at week 8 of 17% (24/141), the response results will be reported in a national/international meeting and the study will continue to enroll for a total of 77 patients. (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: After the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (at approximately 2 months after enrollment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AEPA Chemotherapy31.25

[back to top]

Percentage of Initially Enrolled Patients That Have a Complete Response at Early Response Assessment Compared to Historical Control

To determine the efficacy of 2 cycles of AEPA chemotherapy, the response rate for the first 32 evaluable participants enrolled was evaluated. If it shown efficacy (detect 20% increase complete rate with 80% power and 5% type I error compared with the proportion of historical control of HOD99 (NCT00145600) unfavorable risk patients had complete rate at week 8 of 17% (24/141), the response results will be reported in a national/international meeting and the study will continue to enroll for a total of 77 patients. (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: After the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (at approximately 2 months after enrollment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AEPA Chemotherapy31.25

[back to top]

Local Failure Rate in High Risk HL Patients Treated With AEPA/CAPDac.

The local failure rate within the high-risk HL participants treated with AEPA/CAPDac will be estimated with a 95% confidence interval using appropriate methods (e.g., estimate cumulative incidence in the presence of competing risks). (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: From start of therapy to 2 years after completion of therapy (up to 3 years after study enrollment)

InterventionProbability (Number)
AEPA/CAPDac0.013

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate Estimate for All Evaluable Participants

To evaluate the safety of AEPA/CAPDac, as well as the efficacy (early complete response) after 2 cycles of AEPA chemotherapy in high-risk patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL). (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: After the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (at 2 months from enrollment for each participant)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AEPA/CAPDac35

[back to top]

Comparison of the Event-free (EFS) Survival in High Risk HL Patients Treated With AEPA/CAPDac to the Historical Control HOD99 Unfavorable Risk 2 Arm (UR2).

Event-free survival (EFS) is defined as the probability of survival between the date of study enrollment to the date of first event (relapsed or progressive disease, second malignancy, or death from any cause) or to last follow-up for patients without events. Under the proportional hazard model assumption, the two-sample log-rank test used to compare the EFS between HLHR13 and historical control of HOD99 unfavorable risk 2 arm (UR2). (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: From start of therapy to 2 years after completion of therapy (up to 3 years after study enrollment)

Interventionprobability (Number)
AEPA/CAPDac0.974

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

"The number of patients that achieved a complete response (CR) to therapy as assessed by the revised International Working Group Criteria.~Complete response:~Lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites: Score 1, 2, or 3 with or without a residual mass on 5-point (Daeuville) scale~Bone Marrow: No evidence of FDG-avi disease~No new lesions~Deauville Criteria for PET scan Interpretation in Lymphoma~Five-point scale:~No Uptake~Uptake ≤ mediastinum~Uptake >mediastinum but ≤ liver~Uptake moderately increased compared to liver at any site~Uptake markedly increased compared to the liver at any site or/and new sites of disease" (NCT02505269)
Timeframe: 4-6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Brentuximab Vedotin34

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

"The number of patients that achieved a complete Metabolic Response (CR) or Partial Metabolic Response (PR) to therapy as assessed by the revised International Working Group Criteria.~Complete Metabolic Response:~Lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites: Score 1, 2, or 3 with or without a residual mass on 5-point (Daeuville) scale Bone Marrow: No evidence of FDG-avi disease No new lesions~Partial Metabolic Response:~>Lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites: Score 4, 5 with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size.~Deauville Criteria for PET scan Interpretation in Lymphoma~Five-point scale:~No Uptake~Uptake ≤ mediastinum~Uptake >mediastinum but ≤ liver~Uptake moderately increased compared to liver at any site~Uptake markedly increased compared to the liver at any site or/and new sites of disease" (NCT02505269)
Timeframe: 4-6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Brentuximab Vedotin34

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Grade III and IV Adverse Events

The number of patients that experienced grade III and grade IV adverse events that were deemed to be possibly, probably, or definitely related to study treatment. Adverse events were assessed using Common Toxicology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0) criteria. (NCT02505269)
Timeframe: 4-6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade III Adverse EventsGrade IV Adverse Events
Brentuximab Vedotin40

[back to top]

Efficacy: Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to date of death due to any cause. (NCT03070392)
Timeframe: From randomization to the data cut off date of 13-Oct-2020; median follow-up duration was 14.1 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Tebentafusp21.7
Investigator's Choice16.0

[back to top]

Efficacy: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization to the date of progression (RECIST v1.1) or death due to any cause. (NCT03070392)
Timeframe: PFS was assessed every 3 months from randomization until disease progression or death, up to 36 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Tebentafusp3.3
Investigator's Choice2.9

[back to top]

Safety: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Safety was defined as the number of participants with treatment emergent adverse events, including laboratory abnormalities, ECG changes, and/or physical examination findings. (NCT03070392)
Timeframe: Safety was assessed from informed consent through 90 days after end of treatment, up to 36 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tebentafusp245
Investigator's Choice105

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Tebentafusp Concentration

Serum PK concentrations of tebentafusp were collected over time. (NCT03070392)
Timeframe: PK concentrations were assessed at pre-dose, end of infusion and anytime in the 12 to 24 hour window after completion of the infusion in Cycle 1 on Days 1, 8 and 15.

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 - End of InfusionCycle 1 Day 1 - 12 to 24 hours post-infusionCycle 1 Day 8 - End of InfusionCycle 1 Day 8 - 12 to 24 hours post-infusionCycle 1 Day 15 - End of InfusionCycle 1 Day 15 - 12 to 24 hours post-infusion
Tebentafusp4201.929505.1005787.139738.60213715.9141685.354

[back to top]

Quality-of-Life: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status

Global health status and quality of life was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The score range for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning and better global health status and health-related quality of life. A positive change indicates improvement. (NCT03070392)
Timeframe: EORTC QLQ-C30 was assessed at baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1) and on Day 1 of every other cycle to Cycle 5 Day 1, every fourth cycle thereafter, beginning with Cycle 9 Day 1 and End of Treatment (EOT), up to 36 months. Each cycle is 21 days.

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline Cycle 1Change at Cycle 3Change at Cycle 5Change at Cycle 9Change at Cycle 13Change at Cycle 17Change at Cycle 21Change at Cycle 25Change at Cycle 29Change at EOT
Investigator's Choice74.872-0.238-10.227-8.333-10.185-4.167-4.1670.000.00-10.539
Tebentafusp76.1080.952-1.152-2.193-5.625-10.1850.758-2.381-8.333-10.417

[back to top]

Quality-of-life: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Score (VAS)

The EQ-5D VAS score records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, with 0 being the worst imaginable health state and 100 being the best imaginable health state. A positive change indicates improvement. (NCT03070392)
Timeframe: EQ-5D,5L VAS was assessed at baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1) and on Day 1 of every other cycle to Cycle 5 Day 1, every fourth cycle thereafter, beginning with Cycle 9 Day 1 and End of Treatment (EOT), up to 36 months. Each cycle is 21 days.

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline Cycle 1Change at Cycle 3Change at Cycle 5Change at Cycle 9Change at Cycle 13Change at Cycle 17Change at Cycle 21Change at Cycle 25Change at Cycle 29Change at EOT
Investigator's Choice80.4-0.8-0.7-3.3-2.6-8.5-1.0-4.0-2.0-11.7
Tebentafusp81.00.40.6-0.9-2.0-10.2-1.8-13.60.0-10.1

[back to top]

Quality-of-Life: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D,5L Domain Scores

General health status was assessed using the EQ-5D,5L questionnaire, which includes five dimensions (5D): mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 scoring levels, where 1 indicates a better health state (no problems) and 3 indicates a worse health state. A positive change indicates improvement. (NCT03070392)
Timeframe: EQ-5D,5L was assessed at baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1) and on Day 1 of every other cycle to Cycle 5 Day 1, every fourth cycle thereafter, beginning with Cycle 9 Day 1 and End of Treatment (EOT), up to 36 months. Each cycle is 21 days.

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Mobility - Baseline Cycle 1Mobility - Change at Cycle 3Mobility - Change at Cycle 5Mobility - Change at Cycle 9Mobility - Change at Cycle 13Mobility - Change at Cycle 17Mobility - Change at Cycle 21Mobility - Change at Cycle 25Mobility - Change at Cycle 29Mobility - Change at EOTSelf-care - Baseline Cycle 1Self-care - Change at Cycle 3Self-care - Change at Cycle 5Self-care - Change at Cycle 9Self-care - Change at Cycle 13Self-care - Change at Cycle 17Self-care - Change at Cycle 21Self-care - Change at Cycle 25Self-care - Change at Cycle 29Self-care - Change at EOTUsual activities - Baseline Cycle 1Usual activities - Change at Cycle 3Usual activities - Change at Cycle 5Usual activities - Change at Cycle 9Usual activities - Change at Cycle 13Usual activities - Change at Cycle 17Usual activities - Change at Cycle 21Usual activities - Change at Cycle 25Usual activities - Change at Cycle 29Usual activities - Change at EOTPain/Discomfort - Baseline Cycle 1Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 3Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 5Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 9Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 13Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 17Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 21Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 25Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 29Pain/Discomfort - Change at EOTAnxiety/Depression - Baseline Cycle 1Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 3Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 5Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 9Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 13Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 17Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 21Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 25Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 29Anxiety/Depression - Change at EOT
Investigator's Choice1.30.10.30.00.30.20.50.00.00.41.10.00.00.00.10.00.00.00.00.11.30.10.20.10.10.20.00.00.00.51.50.10.2-0.10.10.30.01.00.50.41.7-0.30.00.1-0.10.00.00.00.50.2
Tebentafusp1.2-0.10.00.0-0.10.30.00.10.00.31.10.00.00.00.10.10.00.00.00.11.20.20.10.20.30.50.30.30.20.41.50.00.00.10.10.40.20.00.10.21.8-0.2-0.2-0.3-0.4-0.4-0.5-0.4-0.60.3

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR) With Pembrolizumab Treatment Alone

"To assess the primary objective of response rate following PET #2 performed after 3 doses of pembrolizumab. PET response will be assessed using the Lugano Criteria (2014) which recommends the 5 point Deauville score for assessing response. The Deauville five-point scale is an internationally-recommended scale for routine clinical reporting and clinical trials using FDG PET-CT in the initial staging and assessment of treatment response in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Patients with a Deauville score of 1-3 will be considered a complete response.~Deauville criteria is defined as follows:~No residual uptake~Slight uptake, but below blood pool (mediastinum)~Uptake above mediastinum, but below or equal to uptake in the liver~Uptake slightly to moderately higher than liver~Markedly increased uptake or any new lesions~Patients will be evaluable for response assessment if they have received at least one dose of pembrolizumab." (NCT03226249)
Timeframe: After 3 cycles of pembrolizumab (1 cycle = 21 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment: Pembrolizumab and AVD Chemotherapy Guided by PET-CT37

[back to top]

Overall Survival at Treatment Completion

Overall survival will be defined as the number of patients that are alive at the time of treatment completion (3 cycles of pembrolizumab and 2-6 cycles of AVD) (NCT03226249)
Timeframe: At completion of treatment with 3 cycles of pembrolizumab (21 day cycles) and up to 6 cycles of AVD (28 days cycles)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment: Pembrolizumab and AVD Chemotherapy Guided by PET-CT30

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Treatment Completion

"PFS is defined as the number of patients that are progression/relapse free at the time of treatment completion (3 cycles of pembrolizumab and up to 6 cycles of AVD).~Progressive or relapse disease is defined as of the following:~Appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during treatment, even if other lesions are decreasing in size.~At least a 50% increased from nadir in the sum of the product of the diameter (SPD) of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered progressive disease, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of less than 1.0 cm must increase by at least 50% and to a size of more than 1.5 x 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis.~At least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node more than 1.0 cm in its short axis.~Lymphoma confirmed by repeat biopsy." (NCT03226249)
Timeframe: At completion of treatment with 3 cycles of pembrolizumab (21 day cycles) and up to 6 cycles of AVD (28 days cycles)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment: Pembrolizumab and AVD Chemotherapy Guided by PET-CT30

[back to top]