Page last updated: 2024-12-11

dutasteride

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Dutasteride: A 5-ALPHA-REDUCTASE INHIBITOR that is reported to inhibit both type-1 and type2 isoforms of the enzyme and is used to treat BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

dutasteride : An aza-steroid that is inasteride in which the tert-butyl group is replaced by a 2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl group. A synthetic 4-azasteroid, dutasteride is a selective inhibitor of both the type 1 and type 2 isoforms of steroid 5alpha-reductase, an intracellular enzyme that converts testosterone to 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone. Dutasteride is used for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia in men with an enlarged prostate gland. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID6918296
CHEMBL ID1200969
CHEBI ID521033
SCHEMBL ID5903
MeSH IDM0281571

Synonyms (100)

Synonym
AB01274774-01
avodart
dutasteride
gi-198745x
avidart
avolve
gg-745
gi-198745
duagen
164656-23-9
dutasteride (jan/usp/inn)
avodart (tn)
D03820
17beta-n-(2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl))phenyl-carbamoyl-4-aza-5alpha-androst-1-en-3-one
gi198745
(5alpha,17beta)-n-(2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3-oxo-4-azaandrost-1-ene-17-carboxamide
DB01126
alpha,alpha,alpha,alpha',alpha',alpha'-hexafluoro-3-oxo-4-aza-5alpha-androst-1-ene-17beta-carboxy-2',5'-xylidide
gi 198745
1h-indeno(5,4-f)quinoline-7-carboxamide, n-(2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-2,4a,4b,5,6,6a,7,8,9,9a,9b,10,11,11a-tetradecahydro-4a,6a-dimethyl-2-oxo-, (4ar,4bs,6as,7s,9as,9bs,11ar)-
dutasteride [usan]
gg 745
(5.alpha.,5 bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl}-3-oxo-4-azaandrost-1-ene-17-carboxamide;dutasteride;avodart;
nsc-740477
nsc740477
duastride
nsc-759880
CHEMBL1200969 ,
(1s,3as,3bs,5ar,9ar,11as)-n-[2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-9a,11a-dimethyl-7-oxo-1,2,3,3a,3b,4,5,5a,6,9b,10,11-dodecahydroindeno[5,4-f]quinoline-1-carboxamide
n-[2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-3-oxo-4-aza-5alpha-androst-1-ene-17beta-carboxamide
chebi:521033 ,
4-azaandrost-1-ene-17-carboxamide, n-[2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-3-oxo-, (5a,17b)-
A810580
(1s,3as,3bs,5ar,9ar,9bs,11as)-n-[2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-9a,11a-dimethyl-7-oxo-1,2,3,3a,3b,4,5,5a,6,9b,10,11-dodecahydroindeno[5,4-f]quinoline-1-carboxamide
unii-o0j6xjn02i
nsc 759880
dutasteride [usan:inn:ban]
nsc 740477
o0j6xjn02i ,
dtxsid8046452 ,
dtxcid6026452
tox21_112199
cas-164656-23-9
bdbm50340481
BCP9000630
AKOS015924431
AKOS015920136
BCPP000248
dutasteride [usp-rs]
dutasteride [vandf]
jalyn component dutasteride
.alpha.,.alpha.,.alpha.,.alpha.',.alpha.',.alpha.'-hexafluoro-3-oxo-4-aza-5.alpha.-androst-1-ene-17.beta.-carboxy-2',5'-xylidide
dutasteride [inn]
dutasteride [mi]
dutasteride [usp monograph]
dutasteride [jan]
dutasteride [who-dd]
dutasteride [orange book]
dutasteride [ep monograph]
dutasteride component of jalyn
dutasteride [mart.]
(5.alpha.,17.beta.)-n-(2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3-oxo-4-azaandrost-1-ene-17-carboxamide
S1202
CS-1542
HY-13613
SCHEMBL5903
gtpl7457
(4ar,4bs,6as,7s,9as,9bs,11ar)-n-(2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-4a,6a-dimethyl-2-oxo-2,4a,4b,5,6,6a,7,8,9,9a,9b,10,11,11a-tetradecahydro-1h-indeno[5,4-f]quinoline-7-carboxamide
Q-201052
AB01274774_02
(1s,2r,7r,10s,11s,14s,15s)-n-[2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,15-dimethyl-5-oxo-6-azatetracyclo[8.7.0.0^{2,7}.0^{11,15}]heptadec-3-ene-14-carboxamide
mfcd00937869
GS-3565
dutasteride, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
dutasteride, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
dutasteride, >=98% (hplc)
dutasteride for system suitability, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
(5alpha,17beta)-n-{2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl}-3-oxo-4-azaandrost-1-ene-17-carboxamide
Q424760
Z1558504346
BCP02344
BRD-K30373883-001-02-8
1h-indeno[5,4-f]quinoline-7-carboxamide, n-[2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,4a,4b,5,6,6a,7,8,9,9a,9b,10,11,11a-tetradecahydro-4a,6a-dimethyl-2-oxo-, (4ar,4bs,6as,7s,9as,9bs,11ar)-
CCG-269904
EX-A1952
(4ar,4bs,6as,7s,9as,9bs,11ar)-n-[2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,4a,4b,5,6,6a,7,8,9,9a,9b,10,11,11a-tetradecahydro-4a,6a-dimethyl-2-oxo-1h-indeno[5,4-f]quinoline-7-carboxamide
(5alpha,17beta)-n-[2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-3-oxo-4-azaandrost-1-ene-17-carboxamide
dutasteride for system suitability
dutasteride- bio-x
BD164398
g04cb02
dutasteridum
dutasterida
dutasteride (mart.)
dutasteride (usp monograph)
dutasteride (usp-rs)
dutasteride (ep monograph)
D5973
EN300-124223
(4ar,4bs,6as,7s,9as,9bs,11ar)-n-[2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4a,6a-dimethyl-2-oxo-1h,2h,4ah,4bh,5h,6h,6ah,7h,8h,9h,9ah,9bh,10h,11h,11ah-indeno[5,4-f]quinoline-7-carboxamide

Research Excerpts

Overview

Dutasteride is a potent inhibitor of 5-alpha reductase enzymes that reduces concentrations of dihydrotestosterone to a greater extent than finasteride. The drug is an effective, safe and well-tolerated treatment either a monotherapy or a combination.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Dutasteride is a specific and selective inhibitor of both 5α-reductase isoforms used mainly in benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms. "( LC-MS/MS determination of dutasteride and its major metabolites in human plasma.
Buś-Kwaśnik, K; Giebułtowicz, J; Gniazdowska, E; Kaza, M, 2021
)
2.36
"The dutasteride add-on is a reasonable treatment option for male patients with LUTS who are not satisfied with tadalafil monotherapy."( Dutasteride add-on treatment to tadalafil for patients with benign prostatic enlargement is similarly effective as dutasteride add-on treatment to alpha blocker: a propensity-score matching analysis.
Abe, N; Ishikawa, M; Kakizaki, H; Makino, S; Miyauchi, K; Wada, N, 2022
)
2.72
"Dutasteride is a 5α-reductase inhibitor that is used for benign prostate hypertrophy and androgenetic alopecia."( Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Associated with Dutasteride Use.
Cheon, K; Cho, BH; Choi, BK; Jung, JW; Lee, KY, 2020
)
1.53
"Dutasteride is a 5alpha-reductase inhibitor in clinical use to treat endocrine conditions. "( Effect of the 5α-reductase enzyme inhibitor dutasteride in the brain of intact and parkinsonian mice.
Caruso, D; Di Paolo, T; Litim, N; Melcangi, RC; Morissette, M, 2017
)
2.16
"Dutasteride is a potent inhibitor of 5-alpha reductase enzymes that reduces concentrations of dihydrotestosterone to a greater extent than finasteride. "( A population-based study of the risk of osteoporosis and fracture with dutasteride and finasteride.
Antoniou, T; Gomes, T; Ho, JM; Juurlink, DN; Macdonald, EM; Mamdani, MM; Tadrous, M; Yao, Z, 2018
)
2.16
"Dutasteride is a pharmacologically important drug employed to treat prostate cancer. "( Deciphering the binding of dutasteride with human alpha-2-macroglobulin: Molecular docking and calorimetric approach.
Ahsan, H; Ali, SS; Khan, FH; Siddiqui, T; Zia, MK, 2019
)
2.25
"Dutasteride is a selective inhibitor of type 1 and type 2 isoforms of 5-α-reductase, an enzyme responsible for the conversion of testosterone to 5-α-dihydrotestosterone, approved as a treatment for symptomatic BPH."( Dutasteride for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Kapoor, A; Wu, C, 2013
)
2.55
"Dutasteride is an effective, safe and well-tolerated treatment either as monotherapy or in combination with an α-blocker, for the management of symptomatic BPH to improve symptoms, reduce the risk of acute urinary retention and risk for BPH-related surgery. "( Dutasteride for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Kapoor, A; Wu, C, 2013
)
3.28
"Dutasteride is suggestive to be an alternative treatment option to patients with AGA who do not clinically respond to finasteride in six months."( Effect of dutasteride 0.5 mg/d in men with androgenetic alopecia recalcitrant to finasteride.
Choi, JW; Huh, CH; Jung, JY; Kim, BJ; Kwon, SH; Park, KC; Yeon, JH; Youn, SW, 2014
)
2.25
"Dutasteride is a dual blocker of both the type-1 and type-2 isoform of SRD5A1 and is indicated in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia."( The anti-androgen drug dutasteride renders triple negative breast cancer cells more sensitive to chemotherapy via inhibition of HIF-1α-/VEGF-signaling.
Bernemann, C; Götte, M; Hülsewig, C; Kiesel, L; Ruckert, C; von Wahlde, MK, 2015
)
1.45
"Dutasteride is a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia. "( [CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF PROSTATE BIOPSY IN PATIENTS RECEIVING DUTASTERIDE FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA].
Endo, T; Hiruta, N; Kamijima, S; Kamiya, N; Lee, FC; Nishimi, D; Oka, R; Suzuki, H; Takanami, M; Utsumi, T; Yano, M, 2015
)
2.1
"Dutasteride is a new drug similar to finasteride, inhibits enzyme testosterone 5-alpha reductase, diminish symptoms of BPH, reduce risk of the complications and increases quality of life in patients with BPH."( Cost effectiveness comparison of dutasteride and finasteride in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia--The Markov model based on data from Montenegro.
Dabanović, V; Janković, S; Kostić, M, 2016
)
1.44
"Dutasteride is a cost effective option for treating BPH comparing to finasteride. "( Cost effectiveness comparison of dutasteride and finasteride in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia--The Markov model based on data from Montenegro.
Dabanović, V; Janković, S; Kostić, M, 2016
)
2.16
"Dutasteride is a 5 alpha-reductase (5AR) inhibitor currently being evaluated both for chemoprevention and treatment of prostate cancer."( Effects of the 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride on gene expression in prostate cancer xenografts.
Anderson, SK; Ballman, KV; Regan, KM; Schmidt, LJ; Sun, Z; Tindall, DJ, 2009
)
1.34
"Dutasteride (Avodart) is a dual inhibitor of both type I and type II 5 alpha reductases, and thus inhibits conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone, a key mediator of male pattern hair loss."( Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dutasteride 0.5 mg once daily in male patients with male pattern hair loss: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study.
Cho, HK; Eun, HC; Hong, SP; Ji, JH; Kim, BY; Kwon, OS; Lee, WS; Lew, BL; Park, HY; Ro, BI; Shin, HS; Sim, WY; Yeon, JH, 2010
)
2.07
"Dutasteride is a dual inhibitor of type I and type II 5α-reductases and provides nearly complete suppression of dihydrotestosterone, which plays a key role in the aetiology and development of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). "( Efficacy and safety of dutasteride in Chinese adults with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study with an open-label extension.
Na, Y; Ye, Z; Zhang, S, 2012
)
2.13
"Dutasteride has proved to be a safe and efficacious treatment for symptoms related to BPH. "( Dutasteride for the treatment of prostate-related conditions.
Bubley, G; Dumas, C; Slater, S, 2012
)
3.26
"Dutasteride is an inhibitor of 5α-reductase, an enzyme that is responsible for the conversion of testosterone to its active form dihydrotestosterone."( Dutasteride/tamsulosin fixed-dose combination for the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement.
Hashim, H; Ismail, M, 2012
)
2.54
"Dutasteride is a potent inhibitor of dihydrotestosterone production that is safe and effective in terms of the reduction of prostate volume and symptoms, flow rate improvement, and the reduction of the risk of acute urinary retention and surgery during a 24-month study period."( Efficacy and safety of a dual inhibitor of 5-alpha-reductase types 1 and 2 (dutasteride) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Andriole, G; Boyle, P; Hoefner, K; Nickel, JC; Roehrborn, CG, 2002
)
1.99
"Dutasteride is a new 5-alpha reductase inhibitor for the treatment of men with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. "( Dutasteride: a new 5-alpha reductase inhibitor for men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Brown, CT; Nuttall, MC, 2003
)
3.2
"Dutasteride is a 5alpha-reductase inhibitor that inhibits both types 1 and 2 isozymes of 5alpha-reductase, the enzyme responsible for converting testosterone to dihydrotestosterone in the prostate and other tissues. "( Dutasteride: a potent dual inhibitor of 5-alpha-reductase for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Rabasseda, X, 2004
)
3.21
"Dutasteride is a new dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. "( Dutasteride: a novel dual inhibitor of 5alpha-reductase for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Djavan, B; Fong, YK; Milani, S, 2005
)
3.21
"Dutasteride is a specific selective inhibitor of the two isoenzymes, while finasteride is a selective inhibitor of type 2 -alpha-reductase."( [Effect of dutasteride on reduction of plasma DHT following finasteride therapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia].
Botto, H; Comenducci, A; Lan, O; Poulain, JE, 2005
)
1.44
"Dutasteride is a novel dual inhibitor of the 5 alpha-reductase enzymes and is currently in use both for treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and in the reduction by dutasteride of prostate cancer events (REDUCE) prostate cancer prevention trial."( Inhibition of fatty acid synthase activity in prostate cancer cells by dutasteride.
Ballman, KV; Schmidt, LJ; Tindall, DJ, 2007
)
1.29

Effects

Dutasteride has a potential to improve BMD with elevation of serum testosterone in aging male patients with LUTS and prostatic enlargement. It has a role as an adjunct in the treatment of prostate cancer; but this is an area still under active investigation.

Dutasteride has been shown to increase expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in prostate cancer cells. It has been demonstrated to be effective in several randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trials in androgenetic alopecia.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Dutasteride has a potential to improve BMD with elevation of serum testosterone in aging male patients with LUTS and prostatic enlargement."( Dutasteride improves bone mineral density in male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and prostatic enlargement: a preliminary study.
Hashizume, K; Kakizaki, H; Matsumoto, S; Wada, N, 2016
)
3.32
"Dutasteride has a role as an adjunct in the treatment of prostate cancer; however, this is an area still under active investigation."( Dutasteride for the treatment of prostate-related conditions.
Bubley, G; Dumas, C; Slater, S, 2012
)
2.54
"Dutasteride has been proposed as an effective therapy for frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA)."( Effectiveness of dutasteride in a large series of patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia in real clinical practice.
Hermosa-Gelbard, Á; Jaén-Olasolo, P; Moreno-Arrones, ÓM; Pindado-Ortega, C; Rodrigues-Barata, AR; Saceda-Corralo, D; Vañó-Galván, S, 2021
)
2.4
"Dutasteride has been shown to increase expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in prostate cancer cells in previous in vitro studies. "( Impact of short-term Dutasteride treatment on prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in a mouse xenograft model.
Burger, IA; Eberli, D; Kranzbühler, B; Prause, L; Rupp, NJ; Salemi, S; Sousa, R; Sulser, T, 2021
)
2.38
"Dutasteride has been demonstrated to be effective in several randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trials in androgenetic alopecia."( Dutasteride in Androgenetic Alopecia: An Update.
Adil, M; Arif, T; Dorjay, K; Sami, M, 2017
)
2.62
"Dutasteride has been shown to be more effective than finasteride in the treatment of AGA but is not yet a recommended therapy."( Androgens and hair loss.
Alsantali, A; Shapiro, J, 2009
)
1.07
"Dutasteride has been investigated in three multicenter studies involving 4325 men aged 50 years and above with benign prostatic hyperplasia."( Dutasteride: a potent dual inhibitor of 5-alpha-reductase for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Rabasseda, X, 2004
)
2.49

Actions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Dutasteride can improve lower urinary tract symptoms by improving storage bladder function and relieving obstruction."( Urodynamic effects of dutasteride add-on therapy to alpha-adrenergic antagonist for patients with benign prostatic enlargement: prospective pressure-flow study.
Hashizume, K; Kakizaki, H; Kita, M; Matsumoto, S; Wada, N, 2013
)
2.15

Treatment

Dutasteride treatment significantly improved urinary symptoms and BMD in patients with low baseline serum TT and FT levels. The drug also reduced alcohol effects on the BAES sedation and SS anesthesia scales. Dutasterside treatment was associated with highly variable alterations in benign epithelial gene expression.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Dutasteride add-on treatment to tadalafil significantly improved IPSS (from 16.4 ± 5.2 to 13.3 ± 6.4) and IPSS-QOL (from 4.0 ± 1.2 to 3.3 ± 1.1), and reduced PV from 55 ± 26 to 39 ± 22 ml."( Dutasteride add-on treatment to tadalafil for patients with benign prostatic enlargement is similarly effective as dutasteride add-on treatment to alpha blocker: a propensity-score matching analysis.
Abe, N; Ishikawa, M; Kakizaki, H; Makino, S; Miyauchi, K; Wada, N, 2022
)
2.89
"Dutasteride treatment led to significant inhibition of the testosterone-induced increase dependent on AR and SLC39A9 in cell viability and migration of T24 and J82 BCa cells and induced alterations in the expression level of cancer progression proteins, such as metalloproteases, p21, BCL-2, NF-KB, and WNT in AR-negative BCa. "( Anti-oncogenic effects of dutasteride, a dual 5-alpha reductase inhibitor and a drug for benign prostate hyperplasia, in bladder cancer.
Cho, SG; Kim, A; Kwak, HJ; Kwak, Y; Lee, M; Park, KS; Seok, J, 2023
)
2.65
"Dutasteride treatment improved not only prostatic inflammation evident as increased gene expression levels in IL-1β and IL-18, but also bladder overactivity shown by increased NVCs during bladder filling. "( Effects of dutasteride in a rat model of chemically induced prostatic inflammation-Potential role of estrogen receptor β.
DeFranco, DB; Mimata, H; Mizoguchi, S; Mori, K; Shin, T; Wang, Z; Yoshimura, N, 2020
)
2.39
"Dutasteride pre-treatment prevented loss of striatal dopamine (DA) and its metabolite DOPAC."( Effect of the 5α-reductase enzyme inhibitor dutasteride in the brain of intact and parkinsonian mice.
Caruso, D; Di Paolo, T; Litim, N; Melcangi, RC; Morissette, M, 2017
)
1.44
"Dutasteride-treated patients had a lower incidence of osteoporosis than those receiving finasteride [2.2 versus 2.6 per 100 person years; hazard ratio (HR) 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.93]."( A population-based study of the risk of osteoporosis and fracture with dutasteride and finasteride.
Antoniou, T; Gomes, T; Ho, JM; Juurlink, DN; Macdonald, EM; Mamdani, MM; Tadrous, M; Yao, Z, 2018
)
1.44
"Dutasteride treatment significantly decreased levels of androsterone and its metabolites."( Effect of Dose and 5α-Reductase Inhibition on the Circulating Testosterone Metabolite Profile of Men Administered Oral Testosterone.
Amory, JK; Basit, A; Prasad, B, 2018
)
1.2
"Dutasteride treatment resulted in a significant upregulation of PSMA surface expression compared to vehicle control after 7 days in all tested concentrations. "( Concentration-dependent effects of dutasteride on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression and uptake of
Burger, IA; Deberle, LM; Eberli, D; Hermanns, T; Kranzbühler, B; Müller, C; Salemi, S; Sulser, T; Umbricht, CA, 2019
)
2.23
"Dutasteride add-on treatment significantly improved IPSS (from 18.4 ± 7.5 to 13.8 ± 7.3) and maximum flow rate (from 11.4 ± 5.6 to 13.0 ± 6.8 ml/sec). "( Urodynamic effects of dutasteride add-on therapy to alpha-adrenergic antagonist for patients with benign prostatic enlargement: prospective pressure-flow study.
Hashizume, K; Kakizaki, H; Kita, M; Matsumoto, S; Wada, N, 2013
)
2.15
"Dutasteride treatment significantly improved urinary symptoms and BMD in patients with low baseline serum TT and FT levels."( Effects of dutasteride on lower urinary tract symptoms and general health in men with benign prostatic hypertroplasia and hypogonadism: a prospective study.
Izumi, K; Kadono, Y; Kitagawa, Y; Koh, E; Konaka, H; Maeda, Y; Mizokami, A; Nakashima, T; Namiki, M; Sakamoto, J; Shigehara, K; Ueno, S; Yaegashi, H, 2014
)
2.23
"Dutasteride pretreatment reduced alcohol effects on the BAES sedation and SS anesthesia scales."( Dutasteride reduces alcohol's sedative effects in men in a human laboratory setting and reduces drinking in the natural environment.
Arias, AJ; Covault, J; Feinn, R; Kranzler, HR; Oncken, C; Pond, T, 2014
)
2.57
"Dutasteride treatment significantly decreased the rats' ventral prostate weight, increased their testosterone levels, and decreased the dihydrotestosterone levels in their serum. "( Effects of the 5α-reductase inhibitor dutasteride on rat prostate α1A-adrenergic receptor and its mediated contractility.
Akino, H; Ito, H; Muramatsu, I; Nagase, K; Wang, D; Yokoyama, O; Zha, X, 2015
)
2.13
"Dutasteride treatment was started and the patients were followed up for 3 months after insertion of the stents."( Biodegradable braided poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) urethral stent combined with dutasteride in the treatment of acute urinary retention due to benign prostatic enlargement: a pilot study.
Hänninen, V; Isotalo, T; Juuti, H; Kellomäki, M; Kotsar, A; Leppiniemi, J; Mikkonen, J; Talja, M; Tammela, TL, 2009
)
1.3
"Dutasteride treatment was associated with highly variable alterations in benign epithelial gene expression."( Variability in the androgen response of prostate epithelium to 5alpha-reductase inhibition: implications for prostate cancer chemoprevention.
Coleman, IM; Geng, L; Holcomb, I; Lucas, J; Mostaghel, EA; Nelson, PS; True, LD, 2010
)
1.08
"A dutasteride treatment resulted in decreases in the DHT and 5α-androstanedione concentrations and DHT/T ratio in the hair samples."( Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry based hair steroid profiling may reveal pathogenesis in hair follicles of the scalp.
Choi, MH; Chung, BC; Jung, HJ; Kim, SJ; Lee, WY, 2011
)
0.93
"Dutasteride treatment attenuated VCaP cell proliferation and invasion."( Role of dutasteride in pre-clinical ETS fusion-positive prostate cancer models.
Ateeq, B; Cao, Q; Lonigro, RJ; Pienta, KJ; Tomlins, SA; Varambally, S; Vellaichamy, A; Wang, R, 2012
)
1.53
"Dutasteride-treated patients with a baseline BII score of < 5 (least symptom burden) had a clinically significant improvement in health status, while placebo-treated patients deteriorated."( Improvements in benign prostatic hyperplasia-specific quality of life with dutasteride, the novel dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor.
Andriole, G; Boyle, P; Höfner, K; Nickel, C; O'Leary, MP; Roehrborn, C, 2003
)
1.27
"Dutasteride treatment is associated with clinically significant improvements in BII score, reflecting improvements in the quality of life of men with BPH. "( Improvements in benign prostatic hyperplasia-specific quality of life with dutasteride, the novel dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor.
Andriole, G; Boyle, P; Höfner, K; Nickel, C; O'Leary, MP; Roehrborn, C, 2003
)
1.99
"Dutasteride treatment was also associated with an 18% decrease in mean benign epithelial cell width compared with placebo (p < 0.0001)."( Effect of the dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride on markers of tumor regression in prostate cancer.
Andriole, GL; Gleave, ME; Humphrey, P; Lazier, CB; Ray, P; Rittmaster, RS; Thomas, LN; Trachtenberg, J, 2004
)
1.3
"Dutasteride treatment for 24 weeks significantly improved BPH symptoms, QoL and patient discomfort and satisfaction, and was well tolerated in clinical practice."( Effect of dutasteride on the symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and patient quality of life and discomfort, in clinical practice.
Comenducci, A; Desgrandchamps, F; Droupy, S; Irani, J; Saussine, C, 2006
)
2.18
"In dutasteride/dutasteride treated patients the risk of acute urinary retention was decreased by 60% in those with a prostate volume of 30 to less than 40 cc and 55% in those with a prostate volume of 40 cc or greater vs values in placebo/dutasteride treated patients (p = 0.036 and <0.001, respectively)."( Dutasteride improves objective and subjective disease measures in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and modest or severe prostate enlargement.
Gittelman, M; McNicholas, T; Ramsdell, J; Young, J, 2006
)
2.29
"Dutasteride treatment results in similar but less marked changes compared with androgen ablation."( The effects of the dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride on localized prostate cancer--results from a 4-month pre-radical prostatectomy study.
Andreou, C; Bostwick, D; Casey, R; Chin, J; Fleshner, N; Gleave, M; Pommerville, P; Qian, J; Rittmaster, R; Steinhoff, G; Thomas, L, 2006
)
2.03
"Treatment with dutasteride promoted morphological changes in the corpus cavernous of this BPH model. "( Effects of the dutasteride and sildenafil association in the penis of a benign prostatic hyperplasia animal model.
Costa, WS; Da Silva, MHA; De Souza, DB; Medeiros, JL; Sampaio, FJB, 2020
)
1.26
"Treatment with dutasteride can help to analyze PSA kinetic. "( Prostate-specific antigen increase during dutasteride to indicate the need for prostate biopsy: influence of prostatic inflammation.
Cattarino, S; Fasulo, A; Gentile, V; Gentilucci, A; Maggi, M; Salciccia, S; Sciarra, A, 2017
)
1.07
"Treatment with dutasteride post-lesion left unchanged striatal DA levels."( Effect of the 5α-reductase enzyme inhibitor dutasteride in the brain of intact and parkinsonian mice.
Caruso, D; Di Paolo, T; Litim, N; Melcangi, RC; Morissette, M, 2017
)
1.06
"Treatment with dutasteride 0.1 mg daily and minoxidil 1 mg daily stabilised hair loss and artificial fibre hair transplantation initially led to a satisfactory cosmetic outcome."( Familial frontal fibrosing alopecia treated with dutasteride, minoxidil and artificial hair transplantation.
Cranwell, WC; Sinclair, R, 2017
)
1.05
"Pretreatment with dutasteride had no significant impact on the detection of prostate cancer (p = 0.97)."( Contrast enhanced transrectal ultrasound for the detection of prostate cancer: a randomized, double-blind trial of dutasteride pretreatment.
Forsberg, F; Gomella, LG; Halpern, EJ; McCue, PA; Trabulsi, EJ, 2012
)
0.91
"Treatment with dutasteride caused a 97% decrease in intraprostatic DHT and was associated with a trend toward increased apoptosis. "( Effect of the dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride on markers of tumor regression in prostate cancer.
Andriole, GL; Gleave, ME; Humphrey, P; Lazier, CB; Ray, P; Rittmaster, RS; Thomas, LN; Trachtenberg, J, 2004
)
0.93
"Treatment with dutasteride was associated with reductions in serum and intraprostatic DHT of >or=90%, and a decrease in total prostate and tumor volumes. "( The effects of the dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride on localized prostate cancer--results from a 4-month pre-radical prostatectomy study.
Andreou, C; Bostwick, D; Casey, R; Chin, J; Fleshner, N; Gleave, M; Pommerville, P; Qian, J; Rittmaster, R; Steinhoff, G; Thomas, L, 2006
)
0.94
"Men treated with dutasteride showed significant improvements in SPI, BSIA, BPWB and BSLA scores compared with placebo."( Dutasteride significantly improves quality of life measures in patients with enlarged prostate.
Black, L; O'Leary, MP; Roehrborn, CG, 2008
)
2.12

Toxicity

Dutasteride was well tolerated with no statistically significant increase in drug-related adverse events during the open-label extension. The adverse event profile was similar to that observed in the overall CombAT population.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Dutasteride is a potent inhibitor of dihydrotestosterone production that is safe and effective in terms of the reduction of prostate volume and symptoms, flow rate improvement, and the reduction of the risk of acute urinary retention and surgery during a 24-month study period."( Efficacy and safety of a dual inhibitor of 5-alpha-reductase types 1 and 2 (dutasteride) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Andriole, G; Boyle, P; Hoefner, K; Nickel, JC; Roehrborn, CG, 2002
)
1.99
"5 mg/day for drug-related adverse events, clinical laboratory test results, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels derived from four large, randomised, double-blind clinical trials (n=5655)."( Safety and tolerability of the dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Andriole, GL; Kirby, R, 2003
)
0.56
" Additionally, when dutasteride was used in combination with an alpha(1)-blocker, the drug-related adverse event profiles were as would be expected for the individual agents."( Safety and tolerability of the dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Andriole, GL; Kirby, R, 2003
)
0.88
" Dutasteride was well tolerated with no statistically significant increase in drug-related adverse events during the open-label extension and no adverse laboratory trends."( Efficacy and safety of dutasteride in the four-year treatment of men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Fenter, T; Freedman, S; Gittleman, M; Marks, LS; Morrill, B; Roehrborn, CG; Tuttle, J; Wolford, ET, 2004
)
1.54
" Near-complete, long-term suppression of dihydrotestosterone (93% at 48 months) with dutasteride did not lead to an increase in adverse events compared with that reported in the 2-year period."( Efficacy and safety of dutasteride in the four-year treatment of men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Fenter, T; Freedman, S; Gittleman, M; Marks, LS; Morrill, B; Roehrborn, CG; Tuttle, J; Wolford, ET, 2004
)
0.86
" Onset of new drug-related adverse events were reported most frequently at the start of therapy and declined over time in patients receiving dutasteride."( Efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with the dual 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Barkin, J; Debruyne, F; Reis, M; Roehrborn, C; Tammela, TL; van Erps, P, 2004
)
0.75
" 5ARIs were generally well tolerated, with sexual dysfunction the most frequently reported adverse effect, although in only a small proportion of men (1%-8%)."( A review of the clinical efficacy and safety of 5alpha-reductase inhibitors for the enlarged prostate.
Miner, M; Naslund, MJ, 2007
)
0.34
" The adverse event profile was similar to that observed in the overall CombAT population, and drug-related adverse events were more common with combination therapy (26%) than with tamsulosin (15%) or dutasteride (9%)."( Efficacy and safety of dutasteride, tamsulosin and their combination in a subpopulation of the CombAT study: 2-year results in Asian men with moderate-to-severe BPH.
Chung, BH; Major-Walker, K; Montorsi, F; Morrill, BB; Roehrborn, CG; Siami, P; Wilson, TH, 2009
)
0.85
")), adverse events, and retention."( Efficacy and safety of tolterodine extended release and dutasteride in male overactive bladder patients with prostates >30 grams.
Chung, DE; Kaplan, SA; Staskin, DR; Te, AE, 2010
)
0.61
" There was no major difference in adverse events between two groups."( Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dutasteride 0.5 mg once daily in male patients with male pattern hair loss: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study.
Cho, HK; Eun, HC; Hong, SP; Ji, JH; Kim, BY; Kwon, OS; Lee, WS; Lew, BL; Park, HY; Ro, BI; Shin, HS; Sim, WY; Yeon, JH, 2010
)
0.63
" Although the incidences of drug-related sexual adverse events were higher in the dutasteride group, only in rare occasions did they lead to drug discontinuation."( Efficacy and safety of dutasteride on prostate cancer risk reduction in Asian men: the results from the REDUCE study.
Akaza, H; Endo, Y; Kanetake, H; Masumori, N; Miyanaga, N; Nakatsu, H; Sagiyama, K; Sakai, H; Sakamoto, S; Tsukamoto, T; Yamanouchi, T, 2011
)
0.91
" The dutasteride group had fewer patients reporting falls than did the placebo group (9 vs 16; p=0·048); there were no other significant differences in reported adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of dutasteride in patients with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Auh, S; Chen, C; Di Prospero, NA; Fernández-Rhodes, LE; Fischbeck, KH; Harris-Love, MO; Jeffries, NO; Kokkinis, AD; La Pean, A; Lehky, TJ; Levy, EW; Li, L; Ryder, JE; Schindler, AB; Shrader, JA; Solomon, BI; Watts, CA; White, MJ, 2011
)
1.19
" Dutasteride was well tolerated with a low incidence of treatment-related adverse events over 18 months."( Efficacy and safety of dutasteride in Chinese adults with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study with an open-label extension.
Na, Y; Ye, Z; Zhang, S, 2012
)
1.6
"Despite their efficacy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) the popularity of inhibitors of 5α-reductase (5ARI) is limited by their association with adverse sexual side effects."( Inhibitors of 5α-reductase-related side effects in patients seeking medical care for sexual dysfunction.
Balercia, G; Corona, G; Forti, G; Maggi, M; Mannucci, E; Maseroli, E; Rastrelli, G; Sforza, A, 2012
)
0.38
" Safety assessments included International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and adverse events."( A 5-year retrospective analysis of 5α-reductase inhibitors in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: finasteride has comparable urinary symptom efficacy and prostate volume reduction, but less sexual side effects and breast complications than dutasteride.
Chung, DE; Kaplan, SA; Lee, RK; Scofield, S; Te, AE, 2012
)
0.56
" The number and severity of adverse events were similar among treatment groups."( A randomized, active- and placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of different doses of dutasteride versus placebo and finasteride in the treatment of male subjects with androgenetic alopecia.
Barboza Martínez, J; Barnes, A; Chetty, D; Ferron-Brady, G; Gubelin Harcha, W; Katsuoka, K; Kawashima, M; Tsai, TF; Tsuboi, R, 2014
)
0.62
"Dutasteride can be used to improve urinary symptoms (IPSS and Q max) and reduce TPV but with awareness of its potential adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of dutasteride for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Choi, JY; Park, T, 2014
)
2.16
" Recent preclinical and clinical findings indicate that 5α-R inhibitors evoke not only beneficial, but also adverse effects."( Adverse effects of 5α-reductase inhibitors: What do we know, don't know, and need to know?
Bortolato, M; Garcia-Segura, LM; Melcangi, RC; Traish, AM; Zitzmann, M, 2015
)
0.42
"Treatment-induced sexual dysfunctions (SD) are a recurrent and controversial topic in recent literature on the adverse events related to the use of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) (1, 2)."( Comments concerning the real risk of sexual adverse events secondary to the use of 5-ARIs.
Pirozzi Farina, F; Pischedda, A, 2016
)
0.43
" Primary end-points included adverse event assessment, incidence of drug-related adverse event and premature discontinuations."( Long-term safety and efficacy of dutasteride in the treatment of male patients with androgenetic alopecia.
Brotherton, B; Irisawa, R; Ito, H; Kawashima, M; Manyak, M; Tsuboi, R; Tsunemi, Y; Yoshiie, H, 2016
)
0.72
" In conclusion, a combination of dutasteride and silodosin therapy may be effective and safe for patients with AUR due to BPH."( Efficacy and Safety of Silodosin and Dutasteride Combination Therapy in Acute Urinary Retention due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Single-Arm Prospective Study.
Hagiwara, K; Hashimoto, Y; Hatakeyama, S; Imai, A; Iwamura, H; Koie, T; Ohyama, C; Yoneyama, T, 2016
)
0.99
"Tamsulosin, dutasteride and imidafenacin combination therapy improves overactive bladder symptoms and quality of life without causing serious adverse drug reactions in patients with enlarged prostate not responding to tamsulosin."( Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with tamsulosin, dutasteride and imidafenacin for the management of overactive bladder symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled trial (DIrecT Study)
Asakura, H; Seki, N; Tokunaga, S; Yamanishi, T, 2017
)
1.08
" Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database revealed a significant disproportionality in the reporting of sexual dysfunction with the use of finasteride."( Assessing dutasteride-associated sexual dysfunction using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
Carviel, J; Gupta, AK; Gupta, MA; Shear, NH, 2018
)
0.88
" The disproportionality was present for all age ranges except for 31-45 years where there were few overall reports of adverse events."( Assessing dutasteride-associated sexual dysfunction using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
Carviel, J; Gupta, AK; Gupta, MA; Shear, NH, 2018
)
0.88
"Treatment of AGA with 5α-reductase inhibitors lead to variable adverse effects and relatively unstable results (therapeutic efficacy ending with treatment cessation), so the choice of optimal therapy is not straightforward."( Androgenetic alopecia; drug safety and therapeutic strategies.
Baconi, DL; Bălălău, C; Constantin, VD; Georgescu, SR; Motofei, IG; Păunică, I; Păunică, S; Rowland, DL; Sârbu, MI; Tampa, M, 2018
)
0.48
" Thus, finasteride preserves important physiological roles of dihydrotestosterone (unrelated to AGA) and, in addition, its adverse effects seem to be (at least in part) predictable."( Androgenetic alopecia; drug safety and therapeutic strategies.
Baconi, DL; Bălălău, C; Constantin, VD; Georgescu, SR; Motofei, IG; Păunică, I; Păunică, S; Rowland, DL; Sârbu, MI; Tampa, M, 2018
)
0.48
" The two drugs appear to show similar rates of adverse reactions, especially in sexual dysfunction."( The efficacy and safety of dutasteride compared with finasteride in treating men with androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cui, Y; Gao, Z; Ma, J; Song, S; Wu, J; Zhou, Z, 2019
)
0.81
"To assess the impact of baseline characteristics on Men's Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) total scores and to evaluate the clinical relevance of MSHQ changes and their association with spontaneously reported sexual adverse events (SexAEs) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia."( Men's Sexual Health Questionnaire score changes vs spontaneous sexual adverse event reporting in men treated with dutasteride/tamsulosin combination therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: A post hoc analysis of
Giuliano, F; Lulic, Z; Manyak, MJ; Palacios-Moreno, JM; Roehrborn, CG; Rosen, RC; Wilson, TH, 2020
)
0.77
"To investigate the sexual, physical, and mental adverse effects associated with exposure to 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARIs)."( An evaluation of the federal adverse events reporting system data on adverse effects of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors.
Chughtai, B; Harrell, MB; Ho, K; Kaplan, SA; Te, AE, 2021
)
0.62
" Reports identified one or more adverse effects, along with all concurrent medications."( An evaluation of the federal adverse events reporting system data on adverse effects of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors.
Chughtai, B; Harrell, MB; Ho, K; Kaplan, SA; Te, AE, 2021
)
0.62
" The frequency, duration of treatment and risk of any adverse event (AE) or serious AE (SAE) was compared for combination therapy versus each monotherapy using non-inferiority testing."( Free combination of dutasteride plus tamsulosin for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in South Korea: analysis of drug utilization and adverse events using the National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database.
Bhak, RH; Cortes, V; Cunnington, M; Duh, MS; Kapse, P; Lulic, Z; Miller, D; Park, S; Son, H; Yoo, SB, 2021
)
0.94
" Adverse events occurred in two cases."( Efficacy and safety of dutasteride with tadalafil add-on therapy in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Fujimoto, K; Gotoh, D; Hori, S; Miyake, M; Morizawa, Y; Nakai, Y; Torimoto, K, 2022
)
1.03

Pharmacokinetics

In the presence or absence of tamsulosin, there were no apparent changes in dutasteride AUC and Cmax. Benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer can be treated with the 5α-reductase inhibitors, finasteride and dutasterside.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Data were analysed by nonlinear mixed effects modelling using NONMEM where both linear and nonlinear pharmacokinetic models were examined."( The pharmacokinetic modelling of GI198745 (dutasteride), a compound with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination.
Gisleskog, PO; Hammarlund-Udenaes, M; Hermann, D; Karlsson, MO, 1999
)
0.57
"The time course of GI198745 serum concentrations indicated concentration dependent elimination, with the apparent half-life increasing with dose."( The pharmacokinetic modelling of GI198745 (dutasteride), a compound with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination.
Gisleskog, PO; Hammarlund-Udenaes, M; Hermann, D; Karlsson, MO, 1999
)
0.57
"G1198745 pharmacokinetics are well described by a pharmacokinetic model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination."( The pharmacokinetic modelling of GI198745 (dutasteride), a compound with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination.
Gisleskog, PO; Hammarlund-Udenaes, M; Hermann, D; Karlsson, MO, 1999
)
0.57
" Simulations closely predicted the outcome of the repeat dose study, estimated parameters of the pharmacodynamic modelling were generally close to within 88 to 116% of those from the original model and the individual predictions did not indicate any bias."( Validation of a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors.
Hammarlund-Udenaes, M; Hermann, D; Karlsson, MO; Olsson Gisleskog, P, 1999
)
0.3
" Therefore, we hypothesize that because of its pharmacokinetic parameters and increased potency against r5AR1, GI198745 is more effective than finasteride in preventing the growth of the rat prostate."( Pharmacokinetic parameters and mechanisms of inhibition of rat type 1 and 2 steroid 5alpha-reductases: determinants for different in vivo activities of GI198745 and finasteride in the rat.
Batchelor, KW; Bramson, HN; Hoffman, CR; Kadwell, SH; Kost, TA; Lee, FW; Overton, LK; Simpson Noel, D; Stuart, JD; Tippin, TK; Yeager, RL, 2001
)
0.31
" Therefore, we conducted a pharmacokinetic study of oral T and TE in oil, with and without concomitant D, in normal men whose T production had been temporarily suppressed by the GnRH antagonist acyline."( Oral testosterone in oil plus dutasteride in men: a pharmacokinetic study.
Amory, JK; Bremner, WJ, 2005
)
0.62
" Therefore, we conducted a pharmacokinetic study of oral T in oil, alone or with D or F, in the fasting and fed states in normal men whose endogenous T production was suppressed by the GnRH antagonist acyline."( Oral testosterone in oil: pharmacokinetic effects of 5alpha reduction by finasteride or dutasteride and food intake in men.
Amory, JK; Bremner, WJ; Page, ST,
)
0.35
"Benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer can be treated with the 5α-reductase inhibitors, finasteride and dutasteride, when pharmacodynamic biomarkers are useful in assessing response."( Simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of 5α-reductase inhibitors and androgens by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Andrew, R; Faqehi, AM; Homer, NZ; Hughes, KA; Naredo, G; Stewart, LH; Upreti, R; Walker, BR, 2015
)
0.63
" In the presence or absence of tamsulosin, there were no apparent changes in dutasteride AUC and Cmax ."( Effect of tamsulosin on the pharmacokinetics of dutasteride in Chinese male healthy volunteers.
Fossler, MJ; Li, H; Wang, C; Yang, J; Zhao, H, 2015
)
0.9
" As part of the project to develop the fixed-dose combination product, alternative formulations of dutasteride were prepared by GSK, and their pharmacokinetic properties were investigated."( Impact of Formulation on the Pharmacokinetics of Dutasteride: Results from Two Phase I Studies.
Fossler, M; Manyak, M; McAleese, P; Roehrborn, C; Zhu, J, 2016
)
0.91
" These studies demonstrate the importance of formulation for obtaining the optimal pharmacokinetic properties of dutasteride."( Impact of Formulation on the Pharmacokinetics of Dutasteride: Results from Two Phase I Studies.
Fossler, M; Manyak, M; McAleese, P; Roehrborn, C; Zhu, J, 2016
)
0.9
" Noncompartmental analysis and modeling approaches were carried out to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of dutasteride."( Pharmacokinetic Study of a Soft Gelatin Capsule and a Solid-Supersaturatable SMEDDS Tablet of Dutasteride in Beagle Dogs.
Baek, IH; Choi, DH; Ha, ES; Kim, JS; Kim, MS; Park, H, 2020
)
0.99
" Using t test analysis, no statistically significant difference was detected in the pharmacokinetic parameters of the two formulations."( Pharmacokinetic Study of a Soft Gelatin Capsule and a Solid-Supersaturatable SMEDDS Tablet of Dutasteride in Beagle Dogs.
Baek, IH; Choi, DH; Ha, ES; Kim, JS; Kim, MS; Park, H, 2020
)
0.78

Compound-Compound Interactions

Curcumin combined with dutasteride suppressed proliferation and affected apoptosis of LNCaP cells.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"To evaluate the likelihood of alpha-adrenergic antagonist (alpha-blocker) discontinuation in combination with dutasteride or finasteride among patients aged > or =65 years with enlarged prostate."( Comparative analysis of alpha-blocker utilization in combination with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors for enlarged prostate in a managed care setting among Medicare-aged men.
Davis, EA; Eaddy, MT; Issa, MM; Lin, PJ; Shah, MB, 2008
)
0.56
"Curcumin combined with dutasteride suppressed proliferation and affected apoptosis of LNCaP cells."( Effects of Curcumin Combined With the 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitor Dutasteride on LNCaP Prostate Cancer Cells.
Arai, G; Fukuda, K; Horie, S; Ide, H; Lu, Y; Nakayama, A; Okada, H; Osaka, A; Saito, K; Takei, A,
)
0.68

Bioavailability

Co-administration of the 5α-reductase inhibitor dutasteride increases the oral testosterone bioavailability in men with experimentally induced hypogonadism. Eudragit E nanoparticles containing a drug load of 5% showed an increase in bioavailability by 550% as compared to dutsasteride suspension.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The validated method has been successfully used to analyze human plasma samples for application in pharmacokinetic, bioavailability or bioequivalence studies."( Selective and rapid liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay of dutasteride in human plasma.
Koteshwara, M; Manoj, S; Puran, S; Ramakrishna, NV; Santosh, M; Vishwottam, KN, 2004
)
0.55
" Human oral bioavailability is an important pharmacokinetic property, which is directly related to the amount of drug available in the systemic circulation to exert pharmacological and therapeutic effects."( Hologram QSAR model for the prediction of human oral bioavailability.
Andricopulo, AD; Moda, TL; Montanari, CA, 2007
)
0.34
"Co-administration of the 5α-reductase inhibitor dutasteride increases the oral testosterone bioavailability in men with experimentally induced hypogonadism."( Oral testosterone with and without concomitant inhibition of 5α-reductase by dutasteride in hypogonadal men for 28 days.
Amory, JK; Bush, MA; Caricofe, RB; Clark, RV; Matsumoto, AM; Swerdloff, RS; Wang, C; Zhi, H, 2011
)
0.85
" Dutasteride improved the oral bioavailability of testosterone while suppressing dihydrotestosterone."( Oral testosterone with and without concomitant inhibition of 5α-reductase by dutasteride in hypogonadal men for 28 days.
Amory, JK; Bush, MA; Caricofe, RB; Clark, RV; Matsumoto, AM; Swerdloff, RS; Wang, C; Zhi, H, 2011
)
1.51
" The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effect of enzyme inhibition on the bioavailability of transdermal progesterone."( Transdermal delivery of bioidentical progesterone using dutasteride (A 5α-reductase inhibitor): a pilot study.
Alany, R; Mehrsai, A; Wahhabaghei, H; Wen, J; Zargar-Shoshtari, S, 2010
)
0.61
" Metabolism by the 5α-reductase enzyme is unlikely to affect the bioavailability of progesterone."( Transdermal delivery of bioidentical progesterone using dutasteride (A 5α-reductase inhibitor): a pilot study.
Alany, R; Mehrsai, A; Wahhabaghei, H; Wen, J; Zargar-Shoshtari, S, 2010
)
0.61
"In this study, amorphous solid dispersions containing dutasteride and various excipients, manufactured by spray-drying processes, were characterized to determine the effects on their ability to form supersaturated solutions and to identify the effects of supersaturation on increasing the bioavailability of dutasteride."( Improved supersaturation and oral absorption of dutasteride by amorphous solid dispersions.
Beak, IH; Kim, MS, 2012
)
0.88
" Eudragit E nanoparticles containing a drug load of 5% showed an increase in bioavailability by 550% as compared to dutasteride suspension."( Evaluation of in vitro dissolution and in vivo oral absorption of dutasteride-loaded eudragit E nanoparticles.
Kim, MS, 2013
)
0.84
" Flavonoids such as silibinin, green tea polyphenols, genistein, curcumin have shown great promise, but avenues to improve their bioavailability are requisite."( Advances in prostate cancer chemoprevention: a translational perspective.
Nambiar, D; Singh, RP, 2013
)
0.39
" In rats, the oral bioavailability of dutasteride increased with the supersaturation induced by the HP-β-CD nanostructures."( Influence of hydrophilic additives on the supersaturation and bioavailability of dutasteride-loaded hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin nanostructures.
Kim, MS, 2013
)
0.89
"The bioavailability of, and peak exposure to, dutasteride are influenced by the formulation of the administered medication."( Impact of Formulation on the Pharmacokinetics of Dutasteride: Results from Two Phase I Studies.
Fossler, M; Manyak, M; McAleese, P; Roehrborn, C; Zhu, J, 2016
)
0.95
"The aim of this study was to develop a dutasteride (DUT) solid dispersion (SD) using hydrophilic substances to enhance its dissolution (%) and oral bioavailability in rats."( Solid dispersion of dutasteride using the solvent evaporation method: Approaches to improve dissolution rate and oral bioavailability in rats.
Byeon, JC; Choi, JS; Jang, WS; Lee, SE; Park, JS, 2018
)
1.07
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" The self-microemulsifying tablets exhibited improved bioavailability (29."( Development of self-microemulsifying tablets containing dutasteride for enhanced dissolution and pharmacokinetic profile.
Choi, MS; Hwang, KM; Park, ES; Seok, SH, 2022
)
0.97

Dosage Studied

The model derived from single dose data from healthy volunteers was considered to be valid for the prediction of DHT levels in the patient population. The preparation of a solid-supersaturatable SMEDDS with HPMC or Soluplus could be a promising formulation strategy to develop novel solid dosage forms of dutasteride.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"To characterize the pharmacokinetics of the dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor GI198745 (dutasteride) to allow for more accurate predictions of GI198745 concentrations after different dosing schedules."( The pharmacokinetic modelling of GI198745 (dutasteride), a compound with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination.
Gisleskog, PO; Hammarlund-Udenaes, M; Hermann, D; Karlsson, MO, 1999
)
0.79
" Thus the model derived from single dose data from healthy volunteers was considered to be valid for the prediction of DHT levels in the patient population after repeated dosing of dutasteride and finasteride."( Validation of a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors.
Hammarlund-Udenaes, M; Hermann, D; Karlsson, MO; Olsson Gisleskog, P, 1999
)
0.5
" A total of 399 patients with BPH were randomized to receive once-daily dosing for 24 wk of dutasteride (0."( Marked suppression of dihydrotestosterone in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia by dutasteride, a dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor.
Clark, RV; Cunningham, GR; Hermann, DJ; Hobbs, S; Morrill, BB; Wilson, TH, 2004
)
0.77
"To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, drug interactions, and dosing recommendations of dutasteride, a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)."( Dutasteride: a dual 5-alpha reductase inhibitor for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Dolder, CR, 2006
)
1.99
"05) inhibits growth of LNCaP human prostate cancer xenografts in intact male nude mice, but this inhibition is not as great as that by equimolar oral dosing with dutasteride."( Pharmacologic basis for the enhanced efficacy of dutasteride against prostatic cancers.
Becker, RE; Dalrymple, SL; Denmeade, SR; Isaacs, JT; Xu, Y, 2006
)
0.78
" Food had a minimal effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of the NmT+D formulation but decreased the maximum observed concentration after dosing (C(max)) for CpT+D."( Nanomilled oral testosterone plus dutasteride effectively normalizes serum testosterone in normal men with induced hypogonadism.
Amory, JK; Bremner, WJ; Bush, MA; Caricofe, RB; Clark, RV; Page, ST; Smith, PM; Zhi, H,
)
0.41
" There was no suggestion of a dose-response relationship between exposure to 5-alpha reductase inhibitors when the exposure was stratified into tertiles of total exposure (P = ."( Association between 5-alpha reductase inhibition and risk of hip fracture.
Cheetham, TC; Haque, R; Jacobsen, SJ; Loo, RK; Shi, JM, 2008
)
0.35
" Testosterone dosing was adjusted to a serum testosterone of 500 to 1,000 ng/dl."( Dutasteride reduces prostate size and prostate specific antigen in older hypogonadal men with benign prostatic hyperplasia undergoing testosterone replacement therapy.
Amory, JK; Dighe, M; Gilchriest, J; Hirano, L; Marck, BT; Matsumoto, AM; Page, ST, 2011
)
1.81
" In conclusion, preparation of dutasteride-loaded HP-β-CD nanostructures using the supercritical antisolvent process affords a viable alternative solid dosage form for dutasteride."( Influence of hydrophilic additives on the supersaturation and bioavailability of dutasteride-loaded hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin nanostructures.
Kim, MS, 2013
)
0.9
"To develop a solid dosage form of dutasteride for improving its oral bioavailability, a novel dry elixir (DE) system was fabricated."( Enhanced oral bioavailability and controlled release of dutasteride by a novel dry elixir.
Ban, E; Jang, DJ; Kim, ST; Oh, E, 2014
)
0.93
" Furthermore, the dosage analysis showed that there were no significant associations between ACS risk and uses of a single drug medication regardless the dosages."( 5α-Reductase inhibitors increase acute coronary syndrome risk in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia.
Chou, CH; Kao, CH; Lin, CL; Lin, MC; Sung, FC, 2015
)
0.42
" Therefore, the preparation of a solid-supersaturatable SMEDDS with HPMC or Soluplus could be a promising formulation strategy to develop novel solid dosage forms of dutasteride."( Preparation and in vivo evaluation of a dutasteride-loaded solid-supersaturatable self-microemulsifying drug delivery system.
Baek, IH; Choo, GH; Ha, ES; Kim, MS, 2015
)
0.88
" When testosterone was dosed orally to men with experimental hypogonadism, a proportion of testosterone-glucuronide increased to 13%."( Effect of Dose and 5α-Reductase Inhibition on the Circulating Testosterone Metabolite Profile of Men Administered Oral Testosterone.
Amory, JK; Basit, A; Prasad, B, 2018
)
0.48
" Thus, overall sexual function in men with BPH and severe LUTS is not impaired by prolonged intake of double dosage of solifenacin combined with dutasteride."( The Risk of Sexual Dysfunction and Effectiveness of Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Severe Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction With Combination of Dutasteride and Solifenacin.
Gainullina, Y; Karashchuk, E; Kosilov, K; Kosilova, L; Kuzina, I; Kuznetsov, V; Loparev, S; Prokofyeva, A, 2018
)
0.88
"Based on the results of this study, the development of a tablet dosage form of dutasteride using a solid-supersaturatable SMEDDS should be considered for humans."( Pharmacokinetic Study of a Soft Gelatin Capsule and a Solid-Supersaturatable SMEDDS Tablet of Dutasteride in Beagle Dogs.
Baek, IH; Choi, DH; Ha, ES; Kim, JS; Kim, MS; Park, H, 2020
)
1
"We sought to describe the therapeutic response to dutasteride and the most effective dosage in FFA compared with other therapeutic options or no treatment."( Effectiveness of dutasteride in a large series of patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia in real clinical practice.
Hermosa-Gelbard, Á; Jaén-Olasolo, P; Moreno-Arrones, ÓM; Pindado-Ortega, C; Rodrigues-Barata, AR; Saceda-Corralo, D; Vañó-Galván, S, 2021
)
1.21
"Main purpose was to evaluate the applicability of a 3D-printer equipped with a hot-melt pneumatic dispenser as a single-step process to prepare tablet dosage forms."( 3D-printed tablets using a single-step hot-melt pneumatic process for poorly soluble drugs.
Jeong, SH; Kim, NA; Kim, SJ; Ko, JY; Lee, JC; Lee, SH, 2021
)
0.62
"001), which was partially increased after the incubation with onion at 10 μM dosage (P < 0."( Restorative effects of red onion (Allium cepa L.) juice on erectile function after-treatment with 5α-reductase inhibitor in rats.
Gur, S; Kaya-Sezginer, E; Onder, A; Oztekin, CV; Yilmaz-Oral, D; Zor, M, 2022
)
0.72
" Eco-friendly and progressive spectrophotometric methods were firstly developed in this work, for the simultaneous determination of Dutasteride (DUT) and Silodosin (SLD) in their newly-marketed dosage form."( Fingerprinting and iso-absorptive resolution techniques for the spectrally overlapping Dutasteride and Silodosin mixture: Content uniformity testing along with greenness profile assessment.
Abdel-Moety, EM; Marzouk, HM; Rezk, MR; Rostom, Y; Wadie, M, 2022
)
1.15
" However, very few studies were reported for their simultaneous quantification in their combined dosage form and were mainly based on chromatographic analysis."( A New Chemometrically Assisted UV Spectrophotometric Method for Simultaneous Determination of Tamsulosin and Dutasteride in Their Pharmaceutical Mixture.
Abbas, AEF; Attia, KAM; Eid, SM; Serag, A, 2022
)
0.93
"The proposed models were effectively used to determine TAM/DUT in their combined dosage form, and statistical comparison with the reported method revealed satisfactory results."( A New Chemometrically Assisted UV Spectrophotometric Method for Simultaneous Determination of Tamsulosin and Dutasteride in Their Pharmaceutical Mixture.
Abbas, AEF; Attia, KAM; Eid, SM; Serag, A, 2022
)
0.93
"Overall, this work presents powerful simple, selective, sensitive, and precise methods for simultaneous quantification of TAM/DUT in their dosage form with satisfactory results."( A New Chemometrically Assisted UV Spectrophotometric Method for Simultaneous Determination of Tamsulosin and Dutasteride in Their Pharmaceutical Mixture.
Abbas, AEF; Attia, KAM; Eid, SM; Serag, A, 2022
)
0.93
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (2)

RoleDescription
EC 1.3.1.22 [3-oxo-5alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase (NADP(+))] inhibitorAn EC 1.3.1.* (oxidoreductase acting on CH-CH group of donor, NAD(+) or NADP(+) as acceptor) inhibitor that interferes with the action of of 3-oxo-5alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase (NADP(+)), EC 1.3.1.22, the enzyme which converts testosterone (CHEBI:17347) into the more potent androgen 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone.
antihyperplasia drugA drug used for the treatment of hyperplasia (increaced cell production within an organ or tissue).
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (3)

ClassDescription
aza-steroidAn aza-steroid is a steroid where in the carbon skeleton a carbon atom is replaced by nitrogen.
(trifluoromethyl)benzenesAn organofluorine compound that is (trifluoromethyl)benzene and derivatives arising from substitution of one or more of the phenyl hydrogens.
delta-lactamA lactam in which the amide bond is contained within a six-membered ring, which includes the amide nitrogen and the carbonyl carbon.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (14)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency18.48910.000221.22318,912.5098AID743040; AID743054
glucocorticoid receptor [Homo sapiens]Homo sapiens (human)Potency17.41590.000214.376460.0339AID720691; AID720692; AID720719
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency5.52380.000229.305416,493.5996AID743069; AID743075; AID743079; AID743080; AID743091
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2 isoform dHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.51190.01789.637444.6684AID588834
thyroid hormone receptor beta isoform 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency3.34910.000323.4451159.6830AID743065; AID743067
Cellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)Potency18.83360.002319.595674.0614AID651631
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)29.80000.11007.190310.0000AID1473738
3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00400.00170.48807.5000AID1573006
3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00010.00010.526710.0000AID1573007
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Glycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.33000.32001.45774.2000AID1203550
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (234)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ER overload responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
somitogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferation involved in immune responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
B cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleotide-excision repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein import into nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrestCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
Ras protein signal transductionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
gastrulationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein localizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA replicationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
determination of adult lifespanCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
rRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to salt stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to X-rayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
viral processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic G1 DNA damage checkpoint signalingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of telomere maintenance via telomeraseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of tissue remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UVCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial DNA repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription initiation-coupled chromatin remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to antibioticCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
circadian behaviorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
bone marrow developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic organ developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein stabilizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of helicase activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein tetramerizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome organizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
type II interferon-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac septum morphogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of programmed necrotic cell deathCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
necroptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ionizing radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-CCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to actinomycin DCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replicative senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative stress-induced premature senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of execution phase of apoptosisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability involved in apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G1 to G0 transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA processingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of pentose-phosphate shuntCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of fibroblast apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
urogenital system development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
liver development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
androgen biosynthetic process3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
androgen catabolic process3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
sex determination3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
male gonad development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to starvation3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulus3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to muscle activity3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
diterpenoid metabolic process3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
spinal cord development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
hippocampus development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
thalamus development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
hypothalamus development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
pituitary gland development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cerebral cortex development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell differentiation3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
male genitalia development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
female genitalia development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to follicle-stimulating hormone3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to insulin stimulus3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
serotonin metabolic process3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
progesterone metabolic process3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to estrogen3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
bone development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to growth hormone3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to fungicide3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cAMP3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to growth factor stimulus3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to estradiol stimulus3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to testosterone stimulus3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to dexamethasone stimulus3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to epinephrine stimulus3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
steroid biosynthetic process3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
startle responseGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane potentialGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
startle responseGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of respiratory gaseous exchange by nervous system processGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transportGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
chloride transportGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
muscle contractionGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide signaling pathwayGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
acrosome reactionGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
visual perceptionGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
adult walking behaviorGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal action potentialGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
neuromuscular process controlling postureGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transmission of nerve impulseGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, glycinergicGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
righting reflexGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
excitatory postsynaptic potentialGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
inhibitory postsynaptic potentialGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to amino acid stimulusGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to zinc ionGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ethanolGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
response to alcoholGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of presynaptic membrane potentialGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
chloride transmembrane transportGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of acrosome reactionGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane potentialGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
androgen biosynthetic process3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
steroid catabolic process3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell-cell signaling3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
androgen metabolic process3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
male gonad development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulus3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
biphenyl metabolic process3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
dibenzo-p-dioxin metabolic process3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
phthalate metabolic process3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
hippocampus development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
hypothalamus development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell differentiation3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
male genitalia development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
female genitalia development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to nutrient levels3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to follicle-stimulating hormone3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to testosterone3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to peptide hormone3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to steroid hormone3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
bone development3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
testosterone biosynthetic process3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
steroid biosynthetic process3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (72)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
TFIID-class transcription factor complex bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
receptor tyrosine kinase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase regulator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent DNA/DNA annealing activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
MDM2/MDM4 family protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
disordered domain specific bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase activity3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
electron transfer activity3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
amide binding3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
3-oxo-5alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase (NADP+) activity3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
NADPH binding3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane signaling receptor activityGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
glycine bindingGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellularly glycine-gated chloride channel activityGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
taurine bindingGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
ligand-gated monoatomic ion channel activity involved in regulation of presynaptic membrane potentialGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
transmitter-gated monoatomic ion channel activity involved in regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activityGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel activityGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
excitatory extracellular ligand-gated monoatomic ion channel activityGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase activity3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein binding3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
testosterone dehydrogenase [NAD(P)] activity3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
amide binding3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
3-oxo-5alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase (NADP+) activity3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (50)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
PML bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
site of double-strand breakCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
germ cell nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membrane3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell body3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasm3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell body fiber3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
perikaryonGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
synapseGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
inhibitory synapseGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
glycinergic synapseGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel complexGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter complexGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
synapseGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGlycine receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membrane3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell body3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell body fiber3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (43)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1573006Inhibition of human type 1 5alpha reductase2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-26, Volume: 61, Issue:14
Fluorine and Fluorinated Motifs in the Design and Application of Bioisosteres for Drug Design.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1272912Effect on organ weight in male wistar rat assessed as vas deferens tissue weight per 100g at 5ml/kg, po qd measured on 15th day after 24 hrs of last dose (Rvb=67.613+/-3.248 mg/100g)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 24, Issue:4
Synthesis and biological evaluation of 3-tetrazolo steroidal analogs: Novel class of 5α-reductase inhibitors.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1272908Effect on organ weight in male wistar rat assessed as dorsal prostate tissue weight per 100g at 5ml/kg, po qd measured on 15th day after 24 hrs of last dose (Rvb=50.325+/-7.519 mg/100g)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 24, Issue:4
Synthesis and biological evaluation of 3-tetrazolo steroidal analogs: Novel class of 5α-reductase inhibitors.
AID1473782Ratio of drug concentration at steady state in human at 0.5 mg, po QD after 24 hrs to IC50 for human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1473781Drug concentration at steady state in human at 0.5 mg, po QD after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1203552Modulation of human alpha7 nAChR expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes assessed as effect on acetylcholine-induced currents at 10 uM after 1 to 4 days by two-electrode voltage clamp assay relative to control2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 58, Issue:7
Ensemble-based virtual screening for cannabinoid-like potentiators of the human glycine receptor α1 for the treatment of pain.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1203550Potentiation of human GlyR-alpha1 expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes assessed as induction of glycine-activated currents after 1 to 4 days by two-electrode voltage clamp assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 58, Issue:7
Ensemble-based virtual screening for cannabinoid-like potentiators of the human glycine receptor α1 for the treatment of pain.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1203549Potentiation of human GlyR-alpha1 expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes assessed as induction of glycine-activated currents at 1 uM after 1 to 4 days by two-electrode voltage clamp assay relative to control2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 58, Issue:7
Ensemble-based virtual screening for cannabinoid-like potentiators of the human glycine receptor α1 for the treatment of pain.
AID1272911Effect on organ weight in male wistar rat assessed as adrenal tissue weight per 100g at 5ml/kg, po qd measured on 15th day after 24 hrs of last dose (Rvb=14.762 +/-0.600 mg/100g)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 24, Issue:4
Synthesis and biological evaluation of 3-tetrazolo steroidal analogs: Novel class of 5α-reductase inhibitors.
AID1272905Increase in body weight gain in male wistar rat at 5ml/kg, po qd measured on 15th day after 24 hrs of last dose (Rvb=9.412+/-1.632g%)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 24, Issue:4
Synthesis and biological evaluation of 3-tetrazolo steroidal analogs: Novel class of 5α-reductase inhibitors.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1272913Effect on organ weight in male wistar rat assessed as epididymis tissue weight per 100g at 5ml/kg, po qd measured on 15th day after 24 hrs of last dose (Rvb=187.356+/- 5.961 mg/100g)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 24, Issue:4
Synthesis and biological evaluation of 3-tetrazolo steroidal analogs: Novel class of 5α-reductase inhibitors.
AID591082Inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis 3 beta hydroxysteriod dehydrogenase2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 21, Issue:8
Inhibition of the M. tuberculosis 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase by azasteroids.
AID1272906Effect on organ weight in male wistar rat assessed as liver tissue weight per 100g at 5ml/kg, po qd measured on 15th day after 24 hrs of last dose (Rvb=2.994+/- 0.254 g/100g)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 24, Issue:4
Synthesis and biological evaluation of 3-tetrazolo steroidal analogs: Novel class of 5α-reductase inhibitors.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID311524Oral bioavailability in human2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Hologram QSAR model for the prediction of human oral bioavailability.
AID1203551Potentiation of human GlyR-alpha1 expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes assessed as induction of glycine-activated currents at 10 uM after 1 to 4 days by two-electrode voltage clamp assay relative to control2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 58, Issue:7
Ensemble-based virtual screening for cannabinoid-like potentiators of the human glycine receptor α1 for the treatment of pain.
AID1473780AUC in human at 0.5 mg, po QD after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1272907Effect on organ weight in male wistar rat assessed as ventral prostate tissue weight per 100g at 5ml/kg, po qd measured on 15th day after 24 hrs of last dose (Rvb=59.494+/- 4.733 mg/100g)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 24, Issue:4
Synthesis and biological evaluation of 3-tetrazolo steroidal analogs: Novel class of 5α-reductase inhibitors.
AID1272910Effect on organ weight in male wistar rat assessed testis tissue weight per 100g at 5ml/kg, po qd measured on 15th day after 24 hrs of last dose (Rvb=1054.099+/- 55.648 mg/100g)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 24, Issue:4
Synthesis and biological evaluation of 3-tetrazolo steroidal analogs: Novel class of 5α-reductase inhibitors.
AID1272909Effect on organ weight in male wistar rat assessed as seminal vesicles tissue weight per 100g at 5ml/kg, po qd measured on 15th day after 24 hrs of last dose (Rvb=175.439+/-12.833 mg/100g)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 24, Issue:4
Synthesis and biological evaluation of 3-tetrazolo steroidal analogs: Novel class of 5α-reductase inhibitors.
AID1573007Inhibition of human type 2 5alpha reductase2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-26, Volume: 61, Issue:14
Fluorine and Fluorinated Motifs in the Design and Application of Bioisosteres for Drug Design.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (698)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's5 (0.72)18.2507
2000's173 (24.79)29.6817
2010's411 (58.88)24.3611
2020's109 (15.62)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 89.80

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index89.80 (24.57)
Research Supply Index6.82 (2.92)
Research Growth Index6.63 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index204.46 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.57 (0.95)

This Compound (89.80)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials188 (25.82%)5.53%
Reviews131 (17.99%)6.00%
Case Studies16 (2.20%)4.05%
Observational8 (1.10%)0.25%
Other385 (52.88%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (109)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Dutasteride in Extending the Time to Progression of Low-Risk, Localized Prostate Cancer in Men Who Are Candidates for or Undergoing Expectant Management [NCT00363311]Phase 4302 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
Drug Use Investigation for AVOLVE(BPH) [NCT01376284]1,000 participants (Actual)Observational2010-12-31Completed
Establishing the Benefits of Adherence to Enlarged Prostate Treatment: A Validation Study Linking Adherence to Outcomes Using the Market Scan Database [NCT01381510]54,459 participants (Actual)Observational2010-06-30Completed
A Biomarker Study of STA9090 in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) With Assessment of Androgen Receptor Pathway Signaling [NCT01368003]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Loss of funding.)
Biomarker Study Targeting Abiraterone Metabolites and Polymporphisms in Men With PSA Progression on Abiraterone for the Treatment of Castration Resistant or Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer (The Bio-STAMP Study) [NCT05705700]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to Feasibility)
A Phase II Neoadjuvant Study of Enzalutamide, Abiraterone Acetate, Dutasteride and Degarelix in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Pre-prostatectomy [NCT02159690]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to loss of funding)
Apoptosis and Expression of Neovascularization-related Factors in Human Prostate Tissue After Administration of Dutasteride [NCT00880672]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Single-Dose, Randomised, Open-Label, Two-Period Crossover Study to Determine the Bioequivalence of the Second Generation Dutasteride and Tamsulosin HCl Combination Capsule in the Fed State in Healthy Adult Male Subjects [NCT02058576]Phase 177 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-11Completed
Mechanisms of Hormonal Control of Spermatogenesis in Man [NCT02147964]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to No funding was obtained for this study.)
Economic Analyses Alongside the REDUCE Clinical Trial [NCT01337258]1 participants (Actual)Observational2010-01-31Completed
Effect of 5α Reductase Inhibitor Dutasteride on the Prevention of the Prostate Cancer in Men With High Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia of the Prostate [NCT00780754]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Benefits of Adherence to 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitor Treatment in Men With Enlarged Prostate: An Assessment of Medicare and Medicaid Patients Using the MarketScan Database [NCT01376258]28,903 participants (Actual)Observational2010-10-31Completed
Dutasteride Treatment for Reducing Heavy Drinking in AUD: Predictors of Efficacy [NCT04098302]Phase 2/Phase 3180 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-15Active, not recruiting
An Open-label, Randomized, Single Dose, Two-Period Crossover Study to Determine the Bioavailability of a Fixed Dose Combination Capsule Formulation of Dutasteride and Tamsulosin Hydrochloride (0.5mg/0.2mg) Relative to Co-administration of Dutasteride 0.5m [NCT01254071]Phase 186 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-10Completed
Single Site, Phase II, Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study of the Effect of Dutasteride (Avodart) 0.5mg on the Volume and Characteristics of Prostate Cancer, as Assessed by Multifunctional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) With Lower Risk Pr [NCT01193855]Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-06-30Recruiting
A Pilot Study of MRI and Spectroscopy Imaging Changes With 6-months of Dutasteride in Patients With Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy and Low-risk Prostate Cancer on Watchful Waiting or Requiring Neoadjuvant Androgen Suppression Prior to Prostate B [NCT00706966]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Comparative Efficacy of DuodartTM Versus Watchful Waiting With Step-up Therapy to Tamsulosin in the Management of Treatment naïve Men With Symptomatic BPH [NCT01294592]Phase 4742 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-22Completed
Subjective and Physiological Effects of Alcohol: Role of Genetic Variation and Adrenal Hormones [NCT00734656]94 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Phase I/II Trial of Ketoconazole, Hydrocortisone, Dutasteride and Lapatinib (KHAD-L) in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer With Pre- and Post-therapy Tumor Biopsies [NCT00953576]Phase 1/Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-29Terminated(stopped due to The study terminated early due to concerns about drug toxicity.)
"Dutasteride in Men Receiving Testosterone Therapy: Impact on Serum PSA, Testosterone, DHT Levels and Prostate Volume: Implications for Prostate Safety" [NCT00752869]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, Repeat Dose, 3 Period Crossover Study to Determine the Bioequivalence of 3 Different Formulations of Tamsulosin at Steady State in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT00609596]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-26Completed
Pharmacokinetic Study of Single Dose Dutasteride in Healthy Subjects [NCT00802321]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
[NCT02839122]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
ARI103094-Follow-Up Study for REDUCE Study Subjects [NCT00883909]2,795 participants (Actual)Observational2009-04-09Completed
A Single-Dose, Randomised, Open-Label, Two-Period Crossover Study to Determine the Bioequivalence of the Second Generation Dutasteride and Tamsulosin HCl Combination Capsule in the Fasted State in Healthy Adult Male Subjects [NCT02052713]Phase 178 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-19Completed
A Randomized, Open Label, Single Dose, Two-way Crossover Clinical Trial to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety/Tolerability of YY-201 in Comparison to Dutasteride and Tadalafil Administered in Healthy Male Volunteer [NCT03240939]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-27Completed
A Long-term Extension Study of GI198745 in Subjects With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [NCT00969072]Phase 2121 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With Dutasteride (0.5mg) and Tamsulosin (0.4mg), Administered Once Daily for 4 Years, Alone and Combination, on the Improvement of Symptoms and Clinical O [NCT00090103]Phase 34,844 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Dutasteride 0.5 mg Administered Orally Once Daily for Four Years to Reduce the Risk of Biopsy-Detectable Prostate Cancer [NCT00056407]Phase 38,231 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial on the Addition of Dutasteride to Combined Androgen Blockade Therapy Versus Combined Androgen Blockade Therapy Alone in Patients With Recurrent and/or Metastatic Salivary Duct Carcinoma - DUCT Study [NCT05513365]Phase 298 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-27Recruiting
Effect of Dutasteride on Androgen-Response Gene Expression During the Tumor Regrowth Phase of Intermittent Androgen Ablation Therapy in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00668642]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Single-dose, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of AD-208 [NCT04214808]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-03Completed
Phase II Trial of Exogenous Testosterone Plus Dutasteride for the Treatment of Castrate Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT00853697]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Exploratory Clinical Trial of Safety and Efficacy of Daily Application of Topical Dutasteride in Men With Androgenic Alopecia. [NCT05599243]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-29Active, not recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of Dutasteride in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Comparative Study of GI198745 (Dutasteride) in Subjects With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. [NCT00368979]Phase 3378 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-17Completed
Switch Study: Are There Any Measurable Differences When Switching Patients on Finasteride Therapy to Dutasteride? [NCT00690950]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-05-31Enrolling by invitation
The Effect of Male Hormonal Contraceptive Regimens on Prostate Tissue In Normal Men [NCT00490555]Phase 2/Phase 332 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Bioequivalence Study of Dutasteride Capsules-An Evaluation of the Bioequivalence of Dutasteride Capsule Manufactured at GSK Compared to Dutasteride Capsule Manufactured at Catalent in Healthy Japanese Male Subjects [NCT02578953]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-09Completed
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing The Efficacy And Safety Of Dutasteride At Improving Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms In Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Being Treated With Single-Dose Goserelin, Trans-Urethral Incisio [NCT00805701]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Metabolic Effects of Testosterone Alone or in Combination With Dutasteride or Anastrazole in Obese Men [NCT00983554]57 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Dutasteride (AVODART™) 0.5 mg in Extending the Time to PSA Doubling in Men With Prostate Cancer and Biochemical Failure (PSA Increase) After Radical Therapy With Cur [NCT00558363]Phase 2294 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Feasibility Study of Oral Hormonal Therapy and Radiation for Non-metastatic, Intermediate or High Risk Prostate Cancer in Men 70 and Older or With Medical Comorbidities [NCT01342367]74 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-17Active, not recruiting
Effect of Dutasteride on Bladder Wall Hypertrophy in Patients With Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A 24-Week Open-Label, Single-Arm Pilot Study [NCT00827814]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
An Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Dutasteride 0.5mg Once Daily for 6 Months in the Treatment of Male Subjects With Androgenetic Alopecia (Norwood-Hamilton Classification Type IIIv, I [NCT00441116]Phase 3153 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-15Completed
Phase II Clinical Trial to Examine the Efficacy and Safety of Dutasteride in Patients With Kennedy's Disease (Spinal and Bulbar Muscular Atrophy) [NCT00303446]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
[NCT01942551]Phase 147 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Effects of Dutasteride on Intraprostatic Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Levels [NCT00062790]Phase 450 participants Interventional2003-10-31Completed
An Open Label, Single Sequence, Three Period, Drug-Drug Interaction Study To Examine The Pharmacokinetics Of Dutasteride And Tamsulosin And Their Interactions In Chinese Male Healthy Volunteers [NCT01957189]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-25Completed
Oral Androgens in Man-4: Gonadotropin Suppression Medicated by Oral Testosterone Enanthate in Oil Plus Dutasteride (Short Title: Oral T-4) [NCT00399165]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Testosterone Replacement and Dutasteride Effectiveness (TRADE) [NCT00194675]Phase 453 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Randomized Double-Blind Parallel Group Study Comparing Casodex (or Generic Equivalent) 50mg Plus Placebo to Casodex (or Generic Equivalent) 50mg Plus Dutasteride 3.5mg Administered for 18 Months to Men With Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed First-Line And [NCT00470834]Phase 4127 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Pilot Trial on the Effects of Testosterone Undecanoate Plus Dutasteride or Placebo on Muscle Strength, Body Composition and Metabolic Profile in Transmen [NCT04545450]Phase 316 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-04Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blinded, Double-dummy, Parallel Group, 48-week, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of DKF-313 in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [NCT04947631]Phase 3667 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-07-27Completed
An Open Label, Multi-centre, Non-interventional Post-marketing Surveillance to Monitor the Safety and Effectiveness of AVODART® Administered in Korean Androgenetic Alopecia Patients According to the Prescribing Information [NCT01004809]712 participants (Actual)Observational2010-04-29Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Six-month Parallel-group Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Dutasteride 0.5mg Once Daily in Chinese Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), Followed by a 12-month Open-label Treatment Phase [NCT00527605]Phase 3253 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Doses of Dutasteride Versus Placebo and Finasteride in the Treatment of Male Subjects With Androgenetic Alopecia [NCT01231607]Phase 3917 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-28Completed
Phase 4 Study of Dual Five Alpha Reductase Inhibition Combined With Alpha Blockade in Men With Refractory Urinary Retention Secondary to BPH [NCT00680680]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Placebo Controlled Pilot Study of Dutasteride for the Reduction of Alcohol Use in Male Drinkers [NCT01262287]Phase 447 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
An Open-label, Randomized, Single Dose, Four-Period Crossover Study to Compare the Bioavailability of Fixed Dose Combination Capsule Formulations of Dutasteride and Tamsulosin Hydrochloride (0.5 mg/0.2 mg) With 10% and 15% of Enteric Coated Pellets With H [NCT01471678]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
An Open-label, Randomized, Single Dose, Multi-stage, Cross-over Study to Determine the Relative Bioavailability of Fixed Dose Combination Products Containing a 3-oblong Dutasteride Soft Gel Capsule and Tamsulosin (0.5 mg Dutasteride /0.2 mg Tamsulosin HCl [NCT01495026]Phase 163 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-06Completed
An Open Label, Multi-centre, Non-interventional Post-marketing Surveillance to Monitor the Safety and/or Efficacy of AVODART(Dutasteride) Administered in Korean BPH(Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia) Patients According to the Prescribing Information [NCT01299571]3,977 participants (Actual)Observational2004-12-31Completed
Multi Center Double Blind Study Comparing 0.5 mg Dutasteride vs Placebo Daily in Men Receiving Intermittent Androgen Ablation Therapy for Prostate Cancer [NCT00553878]Phase 2/Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Pivotal, Open-label Trial Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of the 0.5 mg Dutasteride and 0.4 mg Tamsulosin Combination Once Daily for Six Months in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [NCT01673490]Phase 459 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-29Terminated(stopped due to The sole investigative site refused to accept the amended protocol and declined to continue the study. There was no safety signal nor any other reason.)
A Pilot Investigation of Dutasteride (Avodart) After Failure of Finasteride (Proscar) In the Management of Symptomatic Prostatic Enlargement/Hypertrophy (BPE/H) [NCT00382356]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
A Randomized Trial of Tamsulosin and/or Dutasteride Versus Placebo to Relieve Urinary Symptoms After Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00244309]Phase 3348 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of the Use of Dutasteride for Improving Peri-Operative and Long-Term Outcomes of Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate (DOP Study) [NCT00274417]60 participants Interventional2006-01-31Active, not recruiting
The Effects of Dutasteride on Mood, HPA Axis, and Serum Allopregnanolone Levels in Women With Menstrual-Related Mood Disorders and Controls [NCT00082043]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Prostate Medication, Metabolism and Gut Microbiota [NCT06001619]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-01Recruiting
An Open Label Study to Evaluate the Impact of Novel Fixed-dose Testosterone/Dutasteride Combinations on the Relative Bioavailability of the Individual Dutasteride and Testosterone Components [NCT00400335]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
The Role of 5-alpha Reductase in Mediating Testosterone Actions [NCT00493987]Phase 4184 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Oral Androgens in Man-3: Pharmacokinetics of Oral Testosterone With Concomitant Inhibition of 5α-Reductase by Dutasteride Short Title: ORAL T-3 [NCT00161421]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Study of Safety and Efficacy of Dutasteride in Combination With Tolterodine ER or Placebo in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Including Urgency and Frequency [NCT00939120]Phase 446 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentre Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dutasteride 0.5mg Administered Orally Daily for 24 Weeks to Reduce The Risk of Acute Urinary Retention Relapse Following Successful Trial Wit [NCT00421421]Phase 4276 participants Interventional2007-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Incomplete information)
Assessment of Response of Patients on Surveillance for Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer to Dutasteride [NCT01525914]100 participants (Actual)Observational2010-05-31Completed
Detection of Prostate Cancer With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound After Treatment With Dutasteride [NCT00398281]Phase 3450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
A Phase II, 28-Day, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Twice Daily Oral Doses of Testosterone (150-400mg) Co-administered With 0.25mg Dutasteride Compared With 400mg Testosterone Alone and 0.25mg Dutasteride [NCT00398580]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, Single Dose Crossover Study to Determine the Bioequivalence of Duodart® 0.5mg/0.4mg (Capsule Formulation of Dutasteride 0.5mg and Tamsulosin Hydrochloride 0.4mg) Compared to Concomitant Dosing of Avodart® 0.5mg and Omnic® 0.4mg [NCT01657851]Phase 135 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-23Completed
Phase II Study of Dutasteride in Prostate Cancer Recurrent During Androgen Deprivation Therapy [NCT00403000]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
Role of Testosterone and Its Metabolites Regarding Different Physiological Functions in Subjects Affected by Gender Identity Disorder (FtM Transsexuals) [NCT00146146]Phase 315 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Early Antiandrogen Treatment (EAT) With Dutasteride for COVID-19 (EAT-DUTA AndroCoV Trial) [NCT04729491]Phase 2/Phase 3138 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Abiraterone Acetate Combined With Dutasteride With Correlative Assessment of Tumor Androgen Levels and Androgen Receptor Sequence and Signaling at Baseline and at Progression [NCT01393730]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Ketoconazole, Hydrocortisone and Dutasteride in Asymptomatic Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer [NCT00673127]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
A Multi-center Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of JALYN in Improving Symptoms in Men Diagnosed With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (CP/CPPS) [NCT01830829]Phase 31 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty in enrolling particpants)
Mechanisms of Testosterone-Driven Growth-Hormone (GH) Secretion in Aging Men: Modulation of GHRH, GHRP and Somatostatin Action by Estrogenic Versus Androgenic Steroids [NCT00309855]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Demonstrating the Clinical and Economic Benefit of 5 Alpha Reductase Inhibitor Adherence in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [NCT01334723]35,032 participants (Actual)Observational2010-04-30Completed
A Prospective Study of Sexual Function in Sexually Active Men Treated for BPH [NCT01777269]Phase 4489 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-18Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Study, to Assess the Pharmocodynamic Effect on Dihydrotestosterone Regulated Gene Expression, Longitudinally and in a Dose Dependent Manner, of 0.5mg and 3.5mg Dutasteride Administered Orally Once Daily, for One Ye [NCT00375765]Phase 440 participants Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Clinical Progression and Costs in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients Treated With Early Versus Delayed Combination Therapy [NCT01435954]13,551 participants (Actual)Observational2010-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Combination Treatment With Dutasteride (0.5mg) and Tamsulosin (0.2mg) With Tamsulosin (0.2mg) Monotherapy, Administered Once Daily for 2 Years, on the Improvement of Sy [NCT02058368]Phase 3607 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-10Completed
A Phase II Study of Enzalutamide Plus Dutasteride/Finasteride as First Line Treatment for Vulnerable Patients ≥ 65 Years With Systemic Prostate Cancer [NCT02213107]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-09-30Active, not recruiting
An Open-label, Single Dose, Randomized, Two-period Crossover Study to Investigate the Bioavailability of a Novel Dosage Form of Dutasteride in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01577693]Phase 135 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-12Completed
R01 CA155301: Validation of Digital Morphometry for Cancer Risk in Benign Prostate Biopsies [NCT01594502]139 participants (Actual)Observational2011-09-30Completed
An Open Label Study of 5α-reductase Inhibition on the Regulation of Insulin Action and Metabolic Phenotype in Healthy Volunteers. [NCT01923090]Phase 212 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-08-31Recruiting
An Evaluation of the Bioequivalence of Five 0.1 mg GI198745/Dutasteride Soft Gelatin Capsules Compared to One 0.5 mg GI198745/Dutasteride Gelatin Capsules in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT01929330]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-23Completed
Role of Dutasteride in Treatment of Category IIIB Chronic Prostatitis (A Placebo-Controlled Study) [NCT04756206]Phase 2/Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Completed
Mechanisms of Control of the Intratesticular Hormonal Milieu in Man [NCT01215292]Phase 1/Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
A Prospective Study of Sexual Function in Men Taking Dutasteride for the Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia [NCT02014584]Phase 3117 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-02Completed
Maximal Suppression of the Androgen Axis in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00298155]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Phase 2 Study Of Mdv3100 As A Neoadjuvant Therapy For Patients Undergoing Prostatectomy For Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT01547299]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
A Phase I Study of PCUR-101 in Combination With Androgen Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT04677855]Phase 148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-30Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label, Single-dose, 2-treatment, 2-way, 2-period Crossover Study to Evaluate the Safety and the Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of DKF-313 in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT02352311]Phase 154 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Assess the Role of Dutasteride in Patients Undergoing 3D Mapping Biopsy in Early Stage Prostate Cancer [NCT00985738]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Low recruitment)
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Masked Clinical Trial Comparing Laser TURP With and Without Neo-Adjuvant Dutasteride [NCT00431626]Phase 34 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Low enrollment)
Dutasteride Treatment for the Reduction of Heavy Drinking [NCT01758523]Phase 4189 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
An Open-label, Randomized, Single Dose, Two-way Crossover Study to Determine the Bioavailability of One Fixed Dose Combination Capsule Formulation of Dutasteride and Tamsulosin Hydrochloride (0.5 mg/0.2 mg) Relative to Coadministration of One Dutasteride [NCT02509104]Phase 156 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-30Completed
Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Patients Utilizing Combination Therapy for Enlarged Prostates: A Henry Ford Database Assessment [NCT01386983]332 participants (Actual)Observational2009-03-31Completed
Study ARI114264: A Long-Term Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Dutasteride in the Treatment of Male Subjects With Androgenetic Alopecia [NCT01831791]Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-14Completed
Phase II Study of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride for Prostate Cytoreduction Prior to Permanent Implant I-125 Prostate Brachytherapy [NCT00866554]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Molecular Mechanisms of Dutasteride and Dietary Interventions to Prevent Prostate Cancer and Reduce Its Progression [NCT01653925]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Active, not recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants With HGPIN, ASAP, and Prostate Cancer at Biopsy
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants Starting Alpha Blockers to Control Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Symptoms
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Prostate Volume at Months 24 and 48
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Maximum Urinary Flow (Qmax) at Months 12, 24, 36, and 48
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Volume of HGPIN at Biopsy
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Core Involved at Diagnosis
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Post-biopsy Macroscopic Hematuria
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Testosterone at Month 48
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Number of Cancer-positive Cores
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH CPSI) at Month 48
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Problem Assessment Scale of the Sexual Function Index (PASSFI) at Month 48
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Post-biopsy Macroscopic Hematospermia
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants Undergoing Intervention (Surgical and Non-surgical) for Prostate Cancer Treatment
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in The Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index 6-item Standard Version (MOS Sleep-6S) at Month 48
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Month 48
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH) Impact Index (BII) at Month 48
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Question 8 (QOL Q8) at Month 48
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least One Event of Acute Urinary Retention (AUR)
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least One Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Biopsy-detectable Prostate Cancer at Years 2 and 4 (Crude Rate Approach)
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Biopsy-detectable Prostate Cancer at Years 2 and 4 (Modified Crude Rate Approach)
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Biopsy-detectable Prostate Cancer at Years 2 and 4 (Restricted Crude Rate Approach)
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Gleason Score at Diagnosis
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Concentration at Month 48
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00056407 (26) [back to overview]Treatment Alteration Score
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Prostate Volume at Months 12, 24, 36, and 48
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Number of Events of Acute Urinary Retention (AUR) or Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)-Related Prostatic Surgery at the Indicated Time Periods.
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]"Number of Yes Responses to the Question: Would the Participant Have Paid a Visit to His GP/Urologist Regarding BPH-related Surgery Since the Last Study Visit?"
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Number of Events of First BPH Clinical Progression at Years 1, 2, 3 and 4
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Number of Events of Symptom Deterioration at the Indicated Time Periods
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Event of Post-baseline BPH-related Hematospermia
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Event of Post-baseline BPH-related Macroscopic Hematuria
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AUR or BPH-related Surgery
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Number of Unplanned Visits to GP/Urologist That Would Have Taken Place if a Scheduled Study Visit Had Not Been Planned (Including Visits Resulting From UTI, UI, Macroscopic Haematuria, Etc.)
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Number of Unscheduled Visits to GP/Urologist (Outpatient) Planned, Not Relating to the Study (Including Visits Resulting From UTI, UI, Macroscopic Haematuria, Etc.)
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Number of Unscheduled Visits to GP/Urologist Regarding AUR Symptoms Since the Last Study Visit
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Number of Visits to GP/Urologist Regarding BPH-related Surgery Since the Last Study Visit
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 1 (LOCF)
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 11 (LOCF)
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]"Number of Yes Responses to the Question: Would the Participant Have Paid a Visit to His GP/Urologist Regarding AUR Symptoms if the Study Visit Had Not Been Planned?."
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 7 (LOCF)
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 6 (LOCF)
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 5 (LOCF)
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 4 (LOCF)
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]The Number of Participants With Each of the Five Components of BPH Clinical Progression
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 9 (LOCF)
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 8 (LOCF)
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 3 (LOCF)
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 2 (LOCF)
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 10 (LOCF)
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 12 (LOCF)
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in BPH Impact Index (BII) at Months 12, 24, 36, and 48
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in BPH-Related Health Status (BHS) at Months 12, 24, 36, and 48
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Months 12, 24, 36, and 48
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Transition Zone (Portion of the Prostate That Surrounds the Proximal Urethra) Volume at Months 12, 24, 36, and 48
NCT00090103 (31) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax) at Months 12, 24, 36, and 48
NCT00194675 (6) [back to overview]Effects of Testosterone Gel Alone or in Combination With Oral Dutasteride on Prostate Volume in Hypogonadal Men With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
NCT00194675 (6) [back to overview]Serum and Intraprostatic Hormone Levels: Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
NCT00194675 (6) [back to overview]Serum Hormone Levels: Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, and Dihydrotestosterone(DHT), Dehydroepiandrosterone(DHEA), and Androstenedione.
NCT00194675 (6) [back to overview]Signs and Symptoms Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): Post-voiding Residual (PVR) Urinary Volume
NCT00194675 (6) [back to overview]Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) in Hypogonadal Men (Uroflow)
NCT00194675 (6) [back to overview]The Effects of T Alone or in Combination With Dutasteride on Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) in Hypogonadal Men With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. (International Prostate Symptom Score)
NCT00298155 (2) [back to overview]Prostate Tissue DHT
NCT00298155 (2) [back to overview]To Determine the Effects of Different Modes of Androgen Deprivation on Serum DHT
NCT00303446 (15) [back to overview]Activities of Daily Living, Change From Baseline
NCT00303446 (15) [back to overview]Adult Myopathy Assessment Tool, Change From Baseline
NCT00303446 (15) [back to overview]Creatine Kinase, Change From Baseline
NCT00303446 (15) [back to overview]Timed 2-minute Walk, Change From Baseline
NCT00303446 (15) [back to overview]International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF), Change From Baseline
NCT00303446 (15) [back to overview]Manual Muscle Testing, Change From Baseline.
NCT00303446 (15) [back to overview]Median Compound Muscle Action Potential, Change From Baseline
NCT00303446 (15) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) Mental Component Summary, Percent Change From Baseline
NCT00303446 (15) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary, Change From Baseline
NCT00303446 (15) [back to overview]Motor Unit Nerve Estimation, Change From Baseline
NCT00303446 (15) [back to overview]Muscle Strength Change From Baseline
NCT00303446 (15) [back to overview]Bulbar Rating Scale, Change From Baseline
NCT00303446 (15) [back to overview]Sensory Nerve Action Potential Average, Change From Baseline
NCT00303446 (15) [back to overview]Swallow Score Average, Change From Baseline
NCT00303446 (15) [back to overview]Peroneal Compound Muscle Action Potential, Change From Baseline
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MAX-PC Anxiety Subscale Score Related to PSA Testing (LOCF)
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MAX-PC Fear of Recurrence Subscale Score (LOCF)
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Volume at Years 1.5 and 3
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Cumulative Length of Cancer Tumor Core at Years 1.5, 3, and 0-3
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Number of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy at Years 1.5, 3, and 0-3
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy at Years 1.5, 3, and 0-3
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total FACT-P Score (LOCF)
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Memorial Anxiety Scale Scores for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) LOCF
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Cumulative Length of Cancer Tumor Core
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Mean Percentage of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Number of Biopsies With the Indicated Clinical Tumor Stage at Baseline
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Number of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Pathologic Progression
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Prostate Cancer (PCa) Progression [Restricted Crude Rate Analysis: Number of Participants With PCa Divided by Number of Participants in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population Who Had >=1 Post-baseline Biopsy or Had a Progression
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Gleason Score (GS) on Repeat Biopsy at Year 1.5
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Gleason Score on Repeat Biopsy at Years 0-3
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Total Gleason Score
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Number of Post-baseline Biopsies With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Clinical Stage
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Participants With at Least One Post-baseline Biopsy With the Indicated Prostate Cancer (PCa) Diagnosis
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Participants With at Least One Post-baseline Biopsy With the Indicated Prostate Cancer (PCa) Diagnosis for Their Final Biopsy
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Prostate Volume at Years 1.5 and 3
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total FACT-P Score (LOCF)
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Prostate Volume (PV) LOCF
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Total Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale, Prostate Module (FACT-P) Score
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Total MAX-PC Anxiety Subscale Score Related to PSA Testing
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Total MAX-PC Fear of Recurrence Subscale Score
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Total Memorial Anxiety Scale Scores for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC)
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FACT-P Physical Well-Being Subscale Score (LOCF)
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Therapeutic Progression
NCT00363311 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FACT-P Social Well-Being Subscale Score (LOCF)
NCT00368979 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With IPSS Improvement From Baseline at Week 52
NCT00368979 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Qmax Improvement From Baseline at Week 52
NCT00368979 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 52
NCT00368979 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Maximum Urine Flow Rate (Qmax) at Week 52
NCT00368979 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Prostate Volume at Week 52
NCT00431626 (1) [back to overview]Primary Outcome Measure Will be the 5 Point Change in AUA Symptom Index
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Kept What Hair I Had?
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Usual Hair Loss Has Slowed Down?
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Hair Growth Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (Hair Count) in the Vertex at 6 Months.
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Laboratory Values: Other Chemistry Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Laboratory Values: Liver Enzymes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Laboratory Values: Electrolytes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]The Percentage Change From Baseline in Testosterone at Month 3, 6, and 10
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]The Percentage Change From Baseline in Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Month 3, 6, and 10
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvements From Baseline Score
NCT00441116 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Hair Growth Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (Hair Count) in the Vertex at 3 Months.
NCT00470834 (5) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression
NCT00470834 (5) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT00470834 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Metastatic Disease
NCT00470834 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With PSA Response
NCT00470834 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total PSA at Months 6, 12, 18, 21, and 42
NCT00490555 (5) [back to overview]Androstenedione (AED)
NCT00490555 (5) [back to overview]Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)
NCT00490555 (5) [back to overview]Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Concentration
NCT00490555 (5) [back to overview]Testosterone Concentration
NCT00490555 (5) [back to overview]Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA)
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in the Prostate Volume at Month 3
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in the Prostate Volume at Month 6
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in the Serum DHT at Month 3
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in the Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Month 6
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Qmax at Month 3
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Qmax at Month 6
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the AUA-SI Score at Month 3
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the AUA-SI Score at Month 6
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Prostate Volume at Month 3
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Prostate Volume at Month 6
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Serum DHT at Month 3
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Serum DHT at Month 6
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Maximum Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax) at Month 6
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Qmax at Month 3
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) Score at Month 6
NCT00527605 (16) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in the AUA-SI Score at Month 3
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Time to PSA Progression (in Days)
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With PSA Progression
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) Evaluation Changing From Normal/Diffusely Enlarged at Baseline to Focal Abnormality at Any Time Post-baseline
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Change in PSA Doubling Time (PSADT) From Baseline at Month 12, Month 24, and End-of-treatment (up to 28 Months)
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Threshold Vital Signs at Baseline and Any Time Post-baseline
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Percent Change in PSA From Nadir PSA at Months 12 and 24
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Percent Change in Total PSA From Baseline at Months 12 and 24
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Shift From Normal at Baseline to at Least One Abnormal Laboratory Value for Any Parameter Any Time During the Study
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression From Baseline (in Days)
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Time to PSA Rise From Baseline (in Days)
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Change in PSA From Nadir PSA at Months 12 and 24
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Change in Total PSA From Baseline at Months 12 and 24
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Disease-related Anxiety Measured by the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC)
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants Classified as Treatment Responders at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a PSA Rise From Baseline
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Threshold Laboratory Value for Any Parameter at Baseline (BL) and Any Time Post-baseline
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Disease Progression
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Nipple Tenderness (NT) at Baseline (BL) and Any Time Post-baseline
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Doubling From Baseline (in Days)
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Palpable Breast Tissue (PBT) at Baseline (BL) and Any Time Post-baseline
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With PSA Doubling From Baseline
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With PSA Doubling From Baseline During Year 1
NCT00558363 (23) [back to overview]Time to PSA Doubling From Baseline (in Days) Within Year 1
NCT00668642 (2) [back to overview]Determination of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Doubling Time During First Off-cycle
NCT00668642 (2) [back to overview]Relative Expression of U19 Gene in Tumor From Prostate Gland During First Off-cycle.
NCT00673127 (2) [back to overview]PSA Response
NCT00673127 (2) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00706966 (9) [back to overview]Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Over Time
NCT00706966 (9) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Indices Over Time - FACE
NCT00706966 (9) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Indices Over Time - SQLI
NCT00706966 (9) [back to overview]Symptom Indices Over Time - IIEF-5
NCT00706966 (9) [back to overview]Symptom Indices Over Time - IPSS
NCT00706966 (9) [back to overview]Total PSA Over Time
NCT00706966 (9) [back to overview]Change in Extent of Cancer
NCT00706966 (9) [back to overview]Testosterone Over Time
NCT00706966 (9) [back to overview]Adverse Events Indicative of Safety of Dutasteride
NCT00734656 (4) [back to overview]BAES Sedation Response, Average of 6 Time Points
NCT00734656 (4) [back to overview]BAES Stimulation Response, Average of 6 Time Points
NCT00734656 (4) [back to overview]Breath Alcohol
NCT00734656 (4) [back to overview]Change in Serum 3a-androstanediol Glucuronide
NCT00939120 (9) [back to overview]Post-void Residual (PVR) Volume
NCT00939120 (9) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
NCT00939120 (9) [back to overview]Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OABq)
NCT00939120 (9) [back to overview]International Prostate Symptoms Score, Voiding Subscore
NCT00939120 (9) [back to overview]International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), Total
NCT00939120 (9) [back to overview]International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), Storage Subscore
NCT00939120 (9) [back to overview]Acute Urinary Retention (AUR)
NCT00939120 (9) [back to overview]Maximum Urine Flow Rate (Qmax).
NCT00939120 (9) [back to overview]Urine Voided Volume (Voiding)
NCT00953576 (4) [back to overview]Lapatinib Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) [Phase I]
NCT00953576 (4) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Treatment-Related Adverse Events Rate
NCT00953576 (4) [back to overview]Lapatinib Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) [Phase I]
NCT00953576 (4) [back to overview]Plasma Lapatinib Levels [Phase I]
NCT01215292 (3) [back to overview]Intratesticular Testosterone (IT-T) Level
NCT01215292 (3) [back to overview]Intratesticular Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Level
NCT01215292 (3) [back to overview]Intratesticular Androstenedione (ADD) Level
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hair Growth Index (HGI) Scores at Weeks 12 and 24
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Investigator Photographic Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ) Scores Assessed at Week 12 for Vertex and Frontal Views Separately
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Investigator Photographic Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ) Scores Assessed at Week 24 for Vertex and Frontal Views Separately
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Width Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MT
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Width Within a 2.54 cm (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MT
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Terminal Hair Count (THC) Within a 2.54 cm (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MT
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Terminal Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MT
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Hair Growth Satisfaction Scale (HGSS) Scores at Weeks 12 and 24
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Global Assessment of Improvement From Baseline to Week 24 Assessed for Vertex and Frontal Views Separately
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline (BL) in the Stage (S) of Androgenic Alopecia (AGA) According to the Norwood-Hamilton Scale at Week 12 (W12)
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline (BL) in the Stage (S) of Androgenic Alopecia (AGA) According to the Norwood-Hamilton Scale at Week 24
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of Dutasteride at Week 12, Week 24, and Follow-up (Week 26)
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Week 12, Week 24, and Follow-up (Week 26)
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (BL) in Target Area Hair Count (HC) Within a 2.54 Centimeter (cm) (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (MT)
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by MT
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex, as Assessed by MT at Week 12
NCT01231607 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 2.54 cm (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 as Assessed by MT
NCT01262287 (2) [back to overview]Change Number of Standard Drinks Per Week.
NCT01262287 (2) [back to overview]Change in Standard Drinks Per Week - Moderation by Genetic Variation
NCT01294592 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 2 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
NCT01294592 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Indicated Improvement Categories in the IPSS at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
NCT01294592 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Starting Post-randomization
NCT01294592 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had Any BPH-related Surgery, Who Had the Indicated Type of Surgery, Who Had 2 BPH-related Surgeries, and Who Had >=3 BPH-related Surgeries
NCT01294592 (11) [back to overview]Number of Events of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH
NCT01294592 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the BPH-related Health Status (BHS) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
NCT01294592 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the BPH Impact Index (BII) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
NCT01294592 (11) [back to overview]Exposure to Study Drug
NCT01294592 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach
NCT01294592 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated First-occurring Component of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH
NCT01294592 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 1 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
NCT01299571 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Serious Adverse Event
NCT01299571 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Adverse Event
NCT01299571 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Unexpected Adverse Events
NCT01334723 (8) [back to overview]BPH-Related Costs for Every 30 Days of 5-ARI Therapy
NCT01334723 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Risk of Acute Urinary Retention and Surgery Based on an MPR Threshold of 75%
NCT01334723 (8) [back to overview]Mean BPH-Related Costs for Participants With an MPR >=80% Versus <80%
NCT01334723 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Risk of Acute Urinary Retention and Surgery Based on an MPR Threshold of 80%
NCT01334723 (8) [back to overview]Mean BPH-Related Costs for Participants With an MPR >=75% Versus <75%
NCT01334723 (8) [back to overview]Mean BPH-Related Costs for Participants With an MPR >=70% Versus <70%
NCT01334723 (8) [back to overview]Mean Length of 5-ARI Therapy
NCT01334723 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Risk of Acute Urinary Retention and Surgery Based on an MPR Threshold of 70%
NCT01342367 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Free From Biochemical Failure
NCT01342367 (2) [back to overview]Quality of Life Was Measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire
NCT01386983 (2) [back to overview]Dollar Amount of Enlarged Prostate (EP)-Related Medical Costs Incurred Per Month
NCT01386983 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Progression
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Best Overall Response
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Change in Serum Androgen Levels
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Change in Serum Levels of Testosterone
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Androgen Receptor (AR) Related Mutations
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Presence of AR Amplification
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT01393730 (8) [back to overview]Time to PSA Progression
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Serum Testosterone: Baseline
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Serum Testosterone: Day 180
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 General Health Domain Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Domain Summary Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Bother Subscale Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamic Effects: Assessment of Androgen Receptor Signaling as Measured by Intensity of Androgen Receptor Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Positive Surgical Margins
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Positive Seminal Vesicles
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Positive Lymph Nodes
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 Mental Component Summary
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Pathologic Complete Response Rate
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) That Led to Dose Interruption, Dose Reduction, and Study Drug Discontinuation
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamic Effects: Tissue Dihydrotestosterone (DHT)
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamic Effects: Assessment of Mitotic Index
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Extracapsular Extension: Local Review
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Extracapsular Extension: Central Review
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone at Day 180
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Day 180
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Function Subscale Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 Role-Emotional Domain Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Reduction in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamic Effects: Tissue Testosterone
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Bother Subscale Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Function Subscale Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Summary Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Twelve-Item Short Form Version 2 Physical Functioning Domain Score
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT): Baseline
NCT01547299 (30) [back to overview]Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT): Day 180
NCT01673490 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Maximum Rate of Urinary Flow (Qmax) at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01673490 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Month 6
NCT01673490 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematology Values Shift From Normal at Baseline to Abnormal at Any Time Post-Baseline
NCT01673490 (10) [back to overview]Free to Total PSA Ratio at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01673490 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Prostate -Specific Antigen (PSA) at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01673490 (10) [back to overview]Number Participants With a Negative or Positive Response at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01673490 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Values Shift From Normal at Baseline to Abnormal at Any Time Post-Baseline
NCT01673490 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Post-treatment Adverse Events (AEs) or Any Serious Adverse Event (SAEs) and Treatment-related AEs
NCT01673490 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Events (AEs) or Any Serious Adverse Event (SAEs) and Treatment-related AEs
NCT01673490 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01758523 (6) [back to overview]Carbohydrate-deficient Transferrin
NCT01758523 (6) [back to overview]Drinks Per Week
NCT01758523 (6) [back to overview]HDD/ Week by Treatment Group and AKR1C3*2 Genotype
NCT01758523 (6) [back to overview]Heavy Drinking Days Per Week
NCT01758523 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With no Hazardous Drinking
NCT01758523 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With no Heavy Drinking Days
NCT01777269 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total MSHQ Scores From Baseline at 12 Months Among Participants With IPSS Improvement of >=25 Percent
NCT01777269 (11) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline (BL) in Total Score From the Full Men's Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) at 12 Months
NCT01777269 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Ejaculatory Dysfunction (EjD) at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months
NCT01777269 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reaching Various Thresholds of Change in Total MSHQ From Baseline at 12 Months
NCT01777269 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total MSHQ Scores From Baseline at 12 Months Among Participants With IPSS Improvement of >=2 Points and >=3 Points
NCT01777269 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Satisfaction Score at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months
NCT01777269 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (BPH Impact Index -BII Scores) at 2 Weeks, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
NCT01777269 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Perception of Treatment Benefit/Satisfaction With Treatment (Patient Perception of Study Medication - PPSM Questionnaire Scores) at 2 Weeks, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
NCT01777269 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Scores Using the Observed Cases Approach at 2 Weeks, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
NCT01777269 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Scores From the Full Men's Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) at 1, 3, 6 and 9 Months
NCT01777269 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Erectile Dysfunction (ED) at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Serum Concentrations of Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Baseline, and After 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, and Week 52
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sexual Problems as Assessed by the Problem Assessment Scale of the Sexual Function Inventory (PAS SFI) at Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, and Week 52
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in Target Area Hair Count Within a 2.54 Centimeter (cm) Diameter Circle at Week 26 and Week 52
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in Target Area Hair Width Within a 2.54 cm Diameter Circle at Week 26 and Week 52
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in Terminal Hair Count Within a 2.54 cm Diameter Circle at Week 26 and Week 52
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST) at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin, Albumin and Total Protein at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Potassium, Sodium, Glucose and Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Prostate-specific Antigen at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cells Count at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Mean of Median Score for Panel Global Assessment of Improvement From Baseline to 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks for Vertex and Frontal Views
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behavior Based on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Laboratory Value Shifts From Baseline at Any Time Post-baseline
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Breast Examination Results Any Time Post-Baseline Visit
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Drug-related, Treatment-emergent AEs and AE Leading to Premature Study Drug Discontinuation and Possible Suicidality-related Adverse Event (PSRAE)
NCT01831791 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline (BL) in the Stage of Androgenic Alopecia (AGA) According to the Norwood-Hamilton Scale at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Suicidality Assessment Score by Using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Suicidality Assessment Score by Using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Participant Satisfaction With Hair Growth as Assessed by the Total Score of the HGSS in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the DLQI in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Incidence of Premature Discontinuations in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Incidence of Premature Discontinuations in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to AEs Related to Sexual Function in the Double-blind and Open-label Combined Periods
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to AEs Related to Sexual Function in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to AEs Related to Sexual Function in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) Related to Sexual Function in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AE Related to Sexual Function for the Double-blind and Open-label Combined Periods
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AE Related to Sexual Function in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-related AEs in the Double-blind and Open-label Combined Periods
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-related AEs in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Open-label Treatment Period: Albumin and Total Protein
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Participant Satisfaction With Hair Growth as Assessed by the Total Score of the Hair Growth Satisfaction Scale (HGSS) in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Participants Perception of Sexual Function Measured by Responses to the Global Assessment Questions in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Participants Perception of Sexual Function Measured by Responses to the Global Assessment Questions Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Open-label Treatment Period: Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin and Total Bilirubin.
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Frequency of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure of Clinical Concern in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Double-blind Treatment Period: Albumin and Total Protein
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Double-blind Treatment Period: Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin and Total Bilirubin
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Double-blind Treatment Period: Glucose, Potassium, Sodium and Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Open-label Treatment Period: Glucose, Potassium, Sodium and Urea/BUN.
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameter in the Double-blind Treatment Period: Hematocrit
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameter in the Double-blind Treatment Period: Hemoglobin
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameter in the Double-blind Treatment Period: Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameter in the Open-label Treatment Period: Hematocrit
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameter in the Open-label Treatment Period: Hemoglobin
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameter in the Open-label Treatment Period: Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameters in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameters in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Individual Domain Scores (Erectile Function, Orgasmic Function, Sexual Desire, Intercourse Satisfaction and Overall Sexual Satisfaction) of the IIEF in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Individual Domain Scores (Erectile Function, Orgasmic Function, Sexual Desire, Intercourse Satisfaction and Overall Sexual Satisfaction) of the IIEF in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Score of the IIEF in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Score of the IIEF in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Duration and Persistence of AEs Related to Sexual Function in the Double-blind and Open-label Combined Periods
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Duration and Persistence of AEs Related to Sexual Function in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Duration and Persistence of AEs Related to Sexual Function in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Change in Sexual Function Defined as a Negative Change From Baseline in the IIEF Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) Score of >=4 Units in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Change in Sexual Function Defined as a Negative Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) Score of >=4 Units in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest in the Double-blind and Open-label Combined Periods
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs and PSRAEs in the Double-blind and Open-label Combined Periods
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs and PSRAEs in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AEs, Serious AEs (SAEs) and Possible Suicidality Related Adverse Events (PSRAEs) in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Frequency of Heart Rate of Clinical Concern in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Frequency of Heart Rate of Clinical Concern in the Open-label Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Frequency of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure of Clinical Concern in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02014584 (58) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-related AEs in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Acute Urinary Retention (AUR) or Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)-Related Prostatic Surgery
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With BPH-related Surgery
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants in a Hospital Ward
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With IPSS Improvement From Baseline
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AE) and Serious AE (SAE)
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the BPH-related Health Status (BHS) by LOCF Approach
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Problem Assessment Scale of the Sexual Function Inventory (PAS-SFI)
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual Volume
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Maximum Urine Flow Rate (Qmax) by LOCF Approach
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach at 24 Months
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in BPH Impact Index (BII) by LOCF Approach
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Number of Hospitalization Days
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Qmax Improvement From Baseline by LOCF Approach.
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Suicidal Behavior
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Threshold Clinical Chemistry Value.
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Threshold Hematology Value.
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Vital Signs Exceeding Threshold Values
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hospital Admissions
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With AUR
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Percent Change in Prostate Volume From Baseline
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Digital Rectal Examination (DRE)
NCT02058368 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Qualitative Breast Examination

Number of Participants With HGPIN, ASAP, and Prostate Cancer at Biopsy

"The occurrence and quantity of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) at biopsy were measured. HGPIN and ASAP are considered precancerous conditions. A participant diagnosed with prostate cancer only (i.e., no HGPIN or ASAP) was counted in both the first category (HGPIN or prostate cancer diagnosis) and again in the last category (HGPIN, ASAP, or prostate cancer diagnosis)." (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline to Year 4

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
HGPIN or prostate cancer diagnosisHGPIN and no prostate cancerHGPIN and no ASAP and no prostate cancerHGPIN or ASAPHGPIN or ASAP and no prostate cancerHGPIN, ASAP, or prostate cancer diagnosis
Dutasteride 0.5 mg810151121409248907
Placebo11262682066753731231

[back to top]

Number of Participants Starting Alpha Blockers to Control Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Symptoms

Medication taken during the study, including alpha blockers, was recorded at each 6-month study visit and during phone calls that occurred 3 months after each visit. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Years 1-2, Overall (Years 1-4)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Years 1-2Overall
Dutasteride 0.5 mg317515
Placebo425770

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Prostate Volume at Months 24 and 48

Prostate volume was measured by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) when biopsies were performed at Year 2 and Year 4. The investigator calculated the prostate volume using three prostate measurements (anteroposterior, cephalocaudal, and transverse diameters). Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: log(Post-Baseline/Baseline value) = treatment and cluster and log (baseline value). (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24, and Month 48

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Month 24, n=3192, 3116Month 48, n=3289, 3194
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-17.4-17.5
Placebo13.019.7

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Maximum Urinary Flow (Qmax) at Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

Maximum urinary flow was measured at selected sites using a Dantec Uroflow meter with a Thompson filter. Change from baseline was calculated as Month 12, 24, 36, and 48 values minus the baseline value. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: change from baseline = baseline Qmax and treatment. This measurement was performed at selected centers. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,
Interventionmilliliters/second (Mean)
Month 12, n=1178, 1168Month 24, n=1337, 1295Month 36, n=1375, 1334Month 48, n=1390, 1359
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.270.600.130.41
Placebo-0.55-0.63-0.74-0.90

[back to top]

Volume of HGPIN at Biopsy

The amount of prostate biopsy tissue with HGPIN was measured. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline to Year 4

Interventioncc*10^-3 (microliter) (Mean)
Placebo0.1105
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.0446

[back to top]

Percentage of Core Involved at Diagnosis

The average amount of cancer seen by the pathologist in the prostate tissue samples taken during the biopsy was measured. A core is a prostate biopsy sample. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline to Year 4

Interventionpercentage of core (Mean)
Placebo13.4
Dutasteride 0.5 mg12.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Post-biopsy Macroscopic Hematuria

Participants reported events of macroscopic hematuria (visible blood in the urine) throughout the study. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline to Year 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo168
Dutasteride 0.5 mg127

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Testosterone at Month 48

Testosterone, a male sex hormone, was measured by taking blood samples at screening and yearly thereafter. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 48

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Placebo-0.1
Dutasteride 0.5 mg20.0

[back to top]

Number of Cancer-positive Cores

The average number of prostate biopsy samples (cores) determined to be cancerous by the pathologist was measured. Normally, 10 cores were taken per biopsy for each participant. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline to Year 4

Interventionnumber of cores (Mean)
Placebo1.9
Dutasteride 0.5 mg1.8

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH CPSI) at Month 48

The NIH CSPI is a 9-item questionnaire that measures chronic prostatitis symptoms. The total score ranges from 0 to 43. A higher score indicates greater negative impact of prostatitis. Participants completed the questionnaire at Baseline and at each 6-month visit. Participants whose language did not have a validated translation of the questionnaire did not participate. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: change from Baseline = Baseline Value and Cluster and Treatment. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 48

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.94
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.37

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Problem Assessment Scale of the Sexual Function Index (PASSFI) at Month 48

The PASSFI is a 3-item questionnaire that measures sexual function. Responses range from 0 (big problem) to 4 (no problem), with a total score of 12. A higher score indicates fewer problems with sexual functioning. Participants completed the questionnaire at Baseline and then yearly . Participants whose language did not have a validated translation of the questionnaire did not participate. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: change from baseline = baseline value and cluster and treatment. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 48

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.82
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-1.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Post-biopsy Macroscopic Hematospermia

Participants reported events of macroscopic hematospermia (visible blood in semen) throughout the study. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline through Year 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo78
Dutasteride 0.5 mg53

[back to top]

Number of Participants Undergoing Intervention (Surgical and Non-surgical) for Prostate Cancer Treatment

The number of participants who received treatment for prostate cancer was measured. Prostate cancer interventions included surgical interventions (e.g., prostatectomy, adenomectomy, transurethral resection) and non-surgical interventions (e.g., chemotherapy, hormone therapy, radiation therapy). (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline to Year 4

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any interventionAny surgical interventionAny non-surgical intervention
Dutasteride 0.5 mg30022195
Placebo438304172

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in The Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index 6-item Standard Version (MOS Sleep-6S) at Month 48

The MOS Sleep-6S is a 6-item questionnaire measuring quality of sleep. Scores range from 1 (all of the time) to 6 (none of the time) and are converted to a 1-100 scale and then averaged; a higher score indicates greater negative impact, which indicates more sleep disturbance. Participants completed the questionnaire at Baseline and at each 6-month visit. Participants whose language did not have a validated translation of the questionnaire did not participate. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: change from baseline=baseline value and cluster and treatment. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 48

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.03
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.02

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Month 48

The IPSS is a 7-item questionnaire that measures urinary symptoms. It measures the level of urinary symptoms (including incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia) reported as the total IPSS score. Each of the 7 questions has a 6-point response scale (0=none/not at all to 5=almost always) with a total score that can range from 0-35: mild (0-7), moderate (8-19), or severe (20-35). Estimates are based on adjusted means from the general linear model: change from baseline = baseline value and cluster and treatment. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline to Year 4 (Month 48)

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Placebo1.35
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.46

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH) Impact Index (BII) at Month 48

The BII is a 4-item questionnaire that rates the level of BPH-related physical discomfort, worry, and interference with normal activities the participant has experienced. The total BII score ranges from 1 (no impact on symptoms) to 13 (major impact on symptoms). Participants completed the questionnaire at Baseline and at each 6-month visit. Participants whose language did not have a validated translation of the questionnaire did not participate. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model:change from baseline = baseline value and cluster and treatment. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 48

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.44
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.21

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Question 8 (QOL Q8) at Month 48

The QOL Q8 is the last question of the IPSS Questionnaire. It is a question about the participant's quality of life as it relates to prostate symptoms. Responses range from 0 (most positive) to 6 (most negative). A higher score indicates worse quality of life. Participants completed the questionnaire at Screening, Baseline, and at each 6-month visit. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: change from baseline = baseline value and cluster and treatment. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 48

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.06
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.33

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least One Event of Acute Urinary Retention (AUR)

A participant was considered to have AUR when he reported being unable to urinate and required catherization. Participants were asked to report any events of AUR during the study. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Years 1-2 and Overall (Years 1-4)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Years 1-2Overall
Dutasteride 0.5 mg3963
Placebo150272

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least One Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)

A participant was considered to have a UTI if the investigator noted that the participant had UTI symptoms and had been prescribed antibiotics. Participants were asked to report any events of UTI during the study. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Years 1-2, Years 3-4, and Overall (Years 1-4)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Years 1-2, n=4073, 4049Years 3-4, n=3363, 3318Overall, n=4073, 4049
Dutasteride 0.5 mg13183214
Placebo196164360

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Biopsy-detectable Prostate Cancer at Years 2 and 4 (Crude Rate Approach)

Study biopsies consisted of 10 biopsy samples (cores) in a pre-defined pattern. Biopsies were read at the central pathology laboratory (CPL, which processed the majority, 94%, of biopsies). Biopsy cases that were positive for prostate cancer or precancerous lesions (high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia[HGPIN] or typical small acinar proliferation [ASAP]) and prostate surgeries were reviewed by the lead pathologist. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Years 1-2, Years 3-4, and Overall (Years 1-4)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Years 1- 2, n=4073, 4049Years 3- 4, n=2815, 2844Overall, n=4073, 4049
Dutasteride 0.5 mg435224659
Placebo578280858

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Biopsy-detectable Prostate Cancer at Years 2 and 4 (Modified Crude Rate Approach)

Study biopsies (biop.) consisted of 10 biop. samples (cores) in a pre-defined pattern and were read at the central pathology laboratory. Biop. cases that were positive for prostate cancer or precancerous lesions (HGPIN or ASAP) and prostate surgeries were reviewed by the lead pathologist. Participants included in the risk sets at Years 1-2 and Years 3-4 included those with a positive biop. at Years 1-2 or a biop. after Months 18-24, and those with a positive biop. at Years 3-4 or a biop. after Month 42, respectively. Overall included participants with a positive biop. or biop. after Month 42. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Years 1-2, Years 3-4, and Overall (Years 1-4)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Years 1-2, n=3319, 3209Years 3-4, n=2325, 2434Overall, n=2903, 2869
Dutasteride 0.5 mg435224659
Placebo578280858

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Biopsy-detectable Prostate Cancer at Years 2 and 4 (Restricted Crude Rate Approach)

Study biopsies consisted of 10 biopsy samples (cores) in a pre-defined pattern. Biopsies were read at the central pathology laboratory (which processed the majority, 94%, of biopsies). Biopsy cases that were positive for prostate cancer or precancerous lesions (HGPIN or ASAP) and prostate surgeries were reviewed by the lead pathologist. Participants included in the risk set at Years 1-2, Years 3-4, and Overall (Years 1-4) were those who had a biopsy during the specified time period. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Years 1-2, Years 3-4, and Overall (Years 1-4)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Years 1-2, n=3364, 3244Years 3- 4, n=2359, 2451Overall, n=3424, 3305
Dutasteride 0.5 mg435224659
Placebo578280858

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Gleason Score at Diagnosis

Gleason score was determined by examining prostate biopsies and surgical samples. The Gleason scoring system sums the two most common Gleason grade patterns in order to predict the likelihood of a participant doing well or badly with their cancer. Gleason grades range from 1 (normal) to 5 (advanced cancer). The lowest Gleason score is 2 (1+1), and the highest Gleason score is 10 (5+5). A Gleason score of 2-6 is a low-grade cancer; a Gleason score of 7-10 is high-grade cancer. The most severe high-grade cancers are the subset of Gleason scores 8-10. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline to Year 4

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Between 2 and 6Between 7 and 10Between 8 and 10
Dutasteride 0.5 mg43722029
Placebo61723319

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Concentration at Month 48

Number of participants whose DHT, the active form of the male sex hormone testosterone, was less than 0.555 nanomoles/liter and below the level of detection at Month 48 was measured. It was measured by taking blood samples at screening and yearly thereafter. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Month 48

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
<0.555 nanomoles/Liter
Dutasteride 0.5 mg34142210
Placebo49342

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is assessed as the number of deaths reported throughout the study. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: From time informed consent is signed to 4-month Safety Follow-Up period

,
Interventionnumber of deaths (Number)
Years 1-2Overall
Dutasteride 0.5 mg3270
Placebo2977

[back to top]

Treatment Alteration Score

The treatment alteration score is a measure of the cellular changes due to treatment (effect of male hormone withdrawal) on the nucleus and cytoplasm of the prostate cancer cell. The treatment alteration score is the sum of two scores (the nuclear alteration score and the cytoplasmic architectural score), each ranging from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating no change and 3 indicating severe changes. (NCT00056407)
Timeframe: Baseline to Year 4

,
Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Nuclear, n=3357, 3256Architectural, n=3357, 3258Total, n=3357, 3256
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.0190.0230.041
Placebo0.0080.0090.017

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Prostate Volume at Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

Prostate volume measurements were conducted annually using Transurethral ultrasound (TRUS). The anteroposterior, cephalocaudal, and transverse diameters of the prostate obtained by TRUS calculate the total prostate volume centimeters (cc). Percent change from baseline = [(post-baseline - baseline)/baseline value] x 100. Estimates were based on the adjusted (least squares) means from the general linear model: log(post-baseline/baseline value) + treatment + cluster + log(baseline value) and are reported as percent change from baseline. (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Month 12, n=1411, 1442, 1451Month 24, n= 1427, 1451, 1465Month 36, n= 1430, 1455, 1468Month 48, n= 1430, 1455, 1468
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-25.2-28.0-28.8-28.0
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-24.1-26.9-27.6-27.3
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-1.50.01.64.6

[back to top] [back to top]

"Number of Yes Responses to the Question: Would the Participant Have Paid a Visit to His GP/Urologist Regarding BPH-related Surgery Since the Last Study Visit?"

"At each scheduled 13-week clinic visit post-randomization, the investigator was to record details of any health care utilization associated with BPH-related surgery. Responses to the following question were recorded: Would the participant have paid a visit to his general practitioner (GP)/Urologist regarding BPH-related surgery since the last study visit?. If the answer to the question was yes, the number of Yes responses was recorded." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Every 3 months from Month 3 to Month 48

,,
Interventionyes responses (Number)
Month 3, n=1550, 1581, 1564Month 6, n=1479, 1516, 1513Month 9, n=1438, 1465, 1477Month 12, n=1400, 1431, 1434Month 15, n=1343, 1386, 1380Month 18, n=1318, 1350, 1328Month 21, n=1281, 1326, 1287Month 24, n=1263, 1293, 1244Month 27, n=1233, 1262, 1206Month 30, n=1222, 1221, 1166Month 33, n=1202, 1199, 1128Month 36, n=1187, 1174, 1095Month 39, n=1160, 1144, 1055Month 42, n=1149, 1126, 1034Month 45, n=1129, 1110, 1009Month 48, n=1113, 1093, 990
Dutasteride 0.5 mg342310109129799758883
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg162012591310497537961
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg28161769108354825251

[back to top]

Number of Events of First BPH Clinical Progression at Years 1, 2, 3 and 4

The time when the first symptom/event of BPH clinical progression has occurred (i.e. AUR, incontinence) was measured. Summaries are based on the first occuring event after treatment start. The time period is from treatment start to each participant's last treatment visit. The Year 4 events include all those that occur during the fourth year and beyond. (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Years 1, 2, 3, and 4

,,
Interventionevents (Number)
Year 1, n=1610, 1623, 1611Year 2, n= 1264, 1240, 1262Year 3, n=1135, 1082, 1048Year 4, n= 1047, 959, 880
Dutasteride 0.5 mg184542922
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg126313016
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg171786731

[back to top]

Number of Events of Symptom Deterioration at the Indicated Time Periods

The number of participants (par.) with symptom deterioration of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥4 points on two consecutive visits post-baseline are presented. Data are based on the first occurrence of an event after treatment start. The year-4 events include all that occured during the 4th year and beyond. The IPSS is a 7-item questionnaire measuring the level of urinary symptoms reported as the total score. Each question has a 6-point response scale (0=none/not at all to 5=almost always), with a total score ranging from 0-35: mild (0-7), moderate (8-19), or severe (20-35). (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Years 1, 2, 3, and 4 (from treatment start until each participant's last treatment-phase visit)

,,
Interventionevents (Number)
Year 1, n=1610, 1623, 1611Year 2, n=1286, 1278, 1296Year 3, n=1158, 1132, 1088Year 4, n=1083, 1001, 926
Dutasteride 0.5 mg138382313
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg91231411
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg119494219

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Event of Post-baseline BPH-related Hematospermia

A participant was considered to have hematospermia when there was presence of blood in the semen. Hematospermia can occur from prostatitis (prostate infection), from cancer, or after a prostate biopsy. The event of hematospermia was either participant-reported or identified by the investigator during a clinic visit. Overall Crude Rate is the number of participants from the total number analyzed that experience experienced an incident of post-baseline BPH or Non-BPH related hematospermia. Participants may appear in both categories. (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) through Year 4

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Overall Crude RateNon-BPH-related Crude RateBPH-related Crude Rate
Dutasteride 0.5 mg19317
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg18217
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg20911

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Event of Post-baseline BPH-related Macroscopic Hematuria

A participant was considered to have macroscopic hematuria when there was presence of blood in the urine. The event of macroscopic hematuria was either participant-reported or identified by the investigator during a clinic visit. Overall Crude Rate is the number of participants from the total number analyzed that experience experienced an incident of post-baseline BPH or Non-BPH related macroscopic hematuria. Participants may appear in both categories. (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) through Year 4

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Overall crude rateNon-BPH-related Crude RateBPH-Related Crude Rate
Dutasteride 0.5 mg702845
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg531540
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg812556

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Unplanned Visits to GP/Urologist That Would Have Taken Place if a Scheduled Study Visit Had Not Been Planned (Including Visits Resulting From UTI, UI, Macroscopic Haematuria, Etc.)

"At each scheduled 13-week clinic visit post-randomization, the investigator was to record details of any health care utilization associated with unplanned visits to GP/Urologist. Responses to the following question were recorded: Has the participant had any unplanned GP/Urologist (outpatient) visits that would have taken place if a scheduled study visit had not been planned (this can include visits resulting from UTI, UI macroscopic haematuria, etc?. If the answer to the question was yes, the number of visits was recorded." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Every 3 months from Month 3 to Month 48

,,
Interventionvisits (Number)
Month 3, n=1550, 1581, 1564Month 6, n=1479, 1517, 1514Month 9, n=1439, 1465, 1477Month 12, n=1400, 1431, 1434Month 15, n=1343, 1386, 1380Month 18, n=1318, 1350, 1328Month 21, n=1281, 1326, 1287Month 24, n=1263, 1293, 1244Month 27, n=1233, 1262, 1206Month 30, n=1222, 1221, 1166Month 33, n=1202, 1199, 1128Month 36, n=1187, 1174, 1095Month 39, n=1160, 1144, 1055Month 42, n=1149, 1126, 1035Month 45, n=1129, 1110, 1009Month 48, n=1113, 1093, 990
Dutasteride 0.5 mg25343529222521191185413856
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg2323163024211810157456431
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg26222234272614211410107191265

[back to top]

Number of Unscheduled Visits to GP/Urologist (Outpatient) Planned, Not Relating to the Study (Including Visits Resulting From UTI, UI, Macroscopic Haematuria, Etc.)

"At each scheduled 13-week clinic visit post-randomization, the investigator was to record details of any health care utilization associated with unplanned visits to GP/Urologist. Responses to the following question were recorded: Does the participant have any unscheduled GP/Urologist (outpatients) visits planned, not relating to the study (this can include visits resulting from UTI, UI, macroscopic haematuria, etc.?. If the answer to the question was yes, the number of visits was recorded." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Every 3 months from Month 3 to Month 48

,,
Interventionvisits (Number)
Month 3, n=1550, 1581, 1564Month 6, n=1479, 1516, 1514Month 9, n=1439, 1465, 1477Month 12, n=1400, 1431, 1434Month 15, n=1343, 1386, 1381Month 18, n=1318, 1350, 1328Month 21, n=1281, 1326, 1287Month 24, n=1263, 1293, 1244Month 27, n=1233, 1262, 1206Month 30, n=1222, 1221, 1166Month 33, n=1202, 1199, 1128Month 36, n=1187, 1174, 1095Month 39, n=1160, 1144, 1055Month 42, n=1149, 1126, 1035Month 45, n=1129, 1110, 1009Month 48, n=1113, 1093, 990
Dutasteride 0.5 mg27292728282127231216131210974
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg2723123019232029131068121557
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg303326293234262616102018181588

[back to top]

Number of Unscheduled Visits to GP/Urologist Regarding AUR Symptoms Since the Last Study Visit

"At each scheduled 13-week clinic visit post-randomization, the investigator was to record details of any health care utilization associated with an episode of AUR. Responses to the following question were recorded: Has the participant needed to make any unscheduled visits to his general practitioner (GP)/Urologist regarding AUR symptoms since the last study visit? If the answer to the question was yes, the number of visits was recorded." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Every 3 months from Month 3 to Month 48

,,
Interventionvisits (Number)
Month 3, n=1550, 1581, 1565Month 6, n=1479, 1517, 1514Month 9, n=1439, 1465, 1477Month 12, n=1400, 1431, 1434Month 15, n=1343, 1386, 1380Month 18, n=1318, 1350, 1328Month 21, n=1281, 1326, 1287Month 24, n=1263, 1293, 1244Month 27, n=1233, 1262, 1206Month 30, n=1222, 1221, 1166Month 33, n=1202, 1199, 1128Month 36, n=1187, 1174, 1095Month 39, n=1160, 1144, 1055Month 42, n=1149, 1126, 1035Month 45, n=1129, 1110, 1009Month 48, n=1113, 1093, 990
Dutasteride 0.5 mg6433643262412222
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg8243333213322311
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg73896109778555842

[back to top] [back to top]

Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 1 (LOCF)

"This 12-item questionnaire (PPSM) was developed by GlaxoSmithKline for use in this study and was designed to quantify the participant's perceptions and satisfaction with the effect of study treatment on control of their urinary symptoms at baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, and 48. Participants were asked to respond to the question of Since you began taking the study medication, how has control of your urinary problems changed?." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline (BL), Any Improvement, n=1585, 1600, 1586BL, No Change/Any Worsening, n=1585, 1600, 1586Month (M) 12, Any Improvement, n=1576, 1593, 1581M12, No Change/Any Worsening, n=1576, 1593, 1581M24, Any Improvement, n=1576, 1593, 1581M24, No Change/Any Worsening, n=1576, 1593, 1581M36, Any Improvement, n=1576, 1593, 1581M36, No Change/Any Worsening, n=1576, 1593, 1581M48, Any Improvement, n=1576, 1593, 1581M48, No Change/Any Worsening, n=1576, 1593, 1581
Dutasteride 0.5 mg6569441171422120039312033901212381
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg6968891281295127330312683081278298
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg7068801218363119538611524291138443

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 11 (LOCF)

"This 12-item questionnaire (PPSM) was developed by GlaxoSmithKline for use in this study and was designed to quantify the participant's perceptions and satisfaction with the effect of study treatment on control of their urinary symptoms at baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, and 48. Participants were asked to respond to the question of Overall, how satisfied are you with the study medication and it's effect on your urinary problems?. Satisfact., satisfaction." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline (BL), Any Satisfact., n=1573, 1598, 1574BL, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1573, 1598, 1574Month (M) 12, Any Satisfact., n=1574, 1592, 1581M12, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1574, 1592, 1581M24, Any Satisfact., n=1574, 1592, 1581M24, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1574, 1592, 1581M36, Any Satisfact., n=1574, 1592, 1581M36, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1574, 1592, 1581M48, Any Satifact., n=1574, 1592, 1581M48, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1574, 1592, 1581
Dutasteride 0.5 mg6839151159433118840411884041182410
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg717856150324127929512703041262312
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg6998751202379116341811194621097484

[back to top]

"Number of Yes Responses to the Question: Would the Participant Have Paid a Visit to His GP/Urologist Regarding AUR Symptoms if the Study Visit Had Not Been Planned?."

"At each scheduled 13-week clinic visit post-randomization, the investigator was to record details of any health care utilization associated with an episode of AUR. Responses to the following question were recorded: Would the participant have paid a visit to his GP/Urologist regarding AUR symptoms if this study visit had not been planned?. If the answer to the question was yes, the number of Yes responses was recorded." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Every 3 months from Month 3 to Month 48

,,
Interventionyes responses (Number)
Month 3, n=1550, 1581, 1564Month 6, n=1479, 1516, 1513Month 9, n=1439, 1465, 1477Month 12, n=1400, 1431, 1434Month 15, n=1343, 1386, 1380Month 18, n=1318, 1350, 1328Month 21, n=1281, 1326, 1287Month 24, n=1263, 1293, 1244Month 27, n=1233, 1262, 1206Month 30, n=1222, 1221, 1166Month 33, n=1202, 1199, 1128Month 36, n=1187, 1174, 1095Month 39, n=1160, 1144, 1055Month 42, n=1149, 1126, 1035Month 45, n=1129, 1110, 1009Month 48, n=1113, 1093, 990
Dutasteride 0.5 mg3226141315131591191049889
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg312118891710597957672
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg29261891219178891156855

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 7 (LOCF)

"This 12-item questionnaire (PPSM) was developed by GlaxoSmithKline for use in this study and was designed to quantify the participant's perceptions and satisfaction with the effect of study treatment on control of their urinary symptoms at baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, and 48. Participants were asked to respond to the question of Since you began taking the study medication, how has your pain during urination changed?." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline (BL), Any Improvement, n=852, 889, 822BL, No Change/Any Worsening, n=852, 889, 822Month (M) 12, Any Improvement, n=760, 781, 755M12, No Change/Any Worsening, n=760, 781, 755M24, Any Improvement, n=706, 760, 747M24, No Change/Any Worsening, n=706, 760, 747M36, Any Improvement, n=704, 741, 733M36, No Change/Any Worsening, n=704, 741, 733M48, No Change/Any Worsening, n=702, 739, 740M48, Any Improvement, n=702, 739, 740
Dutasteride 0.5 mg314575500281508252504237252487
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg321531550210532174529175175527
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg319503529226519228491242257483

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 6 (LOCF)

"This 12-item questionnaire (PPSM) was developed by GlaxoSmithKline for use in this study and was designed to quantify the participant's perceptions and satisfaction with the effect of study treatment on control of their urinary symptoms at baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, and 48. Participants were asked to respond to the question of How satisfied are you with the effect the study medication has on your pain prior to urinating?. Satisfact., satisfaction." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline (BL), Any Satisfact., n=908, 932, 889BL, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=908, 932, 889Month (M) 12, Any Satisfact., n=1022, 1088, 1019M12, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1022, 1088, 1019M24, Any Satisfact., n=1077, 1151, 1085M24, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1077, 1151, 1085M36, Any Satisfact., n=1115, 1200, 1135M36, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1115, 1200, 1135M48, Any Satisfact., n=1135, 1223, 1161M48, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1135, 1223, 1161
Dutasteride 0.5 mg351581672416740411785415792431
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg375533712310764313799316810325
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg351538681338708377736399739422

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 5 (LOCF)

"This 12-item questionnaire (PPSM) was developed by GlaxoSmithKline for use in this study and was designed to quantify the participant's perceptions and satisfaction with the effect of study treatment on control of their urinary symptoms at baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, and 48. Participants were asked to respond to the question of Since you began taking the study medication, how has your pain prior to urinating changed?." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline (BL), Any Improvement, n=869, 901, 849BL, No Change/Any Worsening, n=869, 901, 849Month (M) 12, Any Improvement, n=769, 817, 771M12, No Change/Any Worsening, n=769, 817, 771M24, Any Improvement, n=720, 780, 771M24, No Change/Any Worsening, n=720, 780, 771M36, Any Improvement, n=714, 753, 748M36, No Change/Any Worsening, n=714, 753, 748M48, Any Improvement, n=709, 756, 751M48, No Change/Any Worsening, n=709, 756, 751
Dutasteride 0.5 mg331570526291526254514239510246
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg337532556213537183540174531178
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg332517527244535236496252489262

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 4 (LOCF)

"This 12-item questionnaire (PPSM) was developed by GlaxoSmithKline for use in this study and was designed to quantify the participant's perceptions and satisfaction with the effect of study treatment on control of their urinary symptoms at baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, and 48. Participants were asked to respond to the question of How satisfied are you with the effect of the study medication on the strength of your urinary stream?. Satisfact., satisfaction." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline (BL), Any Satisfact., n=1583,1601,1582BL, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1583,1601,1582Month (M) 12, Any Satisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581M12, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581M24, Any Satisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581M24, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581M36, Any Satisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581M36, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581M48, Any Satisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581M48, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581
Dutasteride 0.5 mg58610151037556107252110755181089504
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg6329511154422120337312013751208368
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg6139691097484105153010395421022559

[back to top]

The Number of Participants With Each of the Five Components of BPH Clinical Progression

The five components measured were symptom deterioration, BPH-related AUR, BPH-related incontinence, recurrent BPH-related Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), and BPH-related renal insufficiency. (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Year 4

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Symptom deteriorationBPH-related AURBPH-related incontinenceRecurrent BPH-related UTIBPH-related renal insufficiency
Dutasteride 0.5 mg203314952
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg132224621
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg221645635

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 9 (LOCF)

"This 12-item questionnaire (PPSM) was developed by GlaxoSmithKline for use in this study and was designed to quantify the participant's perceptions and satisfaction with the effect of study treatment on control of their urinary symptoms at baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, and 48. Participants were asked to respond to the question of Since you began taking the study medication, how has the way your urinary problems interfere with your ability to go about your usual activities changed?." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline (BL), Any Improvement, n=1574, 1599, 1575BL, No Change/Any Worsening, n=1574, 1599, 1575Month (M) 12, Any Improvement, n=1575, 1593, 1580M12, No Change/Any Worsening, n=1575, 1593, 1580M24, Any Improvement, n=1575, 1593, 1580M24, No Change/Any Worsening, n=1575, 1593, 1580M36, Any Improvement, n=1575, 1593, 1580M36, No Change/Any Worsening, n=1575, 1593, 1580M48, Any Improvement, n=1575, 1593, 1580M48, No Change/Any Worsening, n=1575, 1593, 1580
Dutasteride 0.5 mg48111181027566105354015935291063530
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg50910651124451114642915754121148427
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg49410811084496104953115805531008572

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 8 (LOCF)

"This 12-item questionnaire (PPSM) was developed by GlaxoSmithKline for use in this study and was designed to quantify the participant's perceptions and satisfaction with the effect of study treatment on control of their urinary symptoms at baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, and 48. Participants were asked to respond to the question of How satisfied are you with the effect the study medication has on your pain during urination?. Satisfact., satisfaction." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline (BL), Any Satisfact., n=890, 925, 851BL, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=890, 925, 851Month (M) 12, Any Satisfact., n=1022, 1088, 1011M12, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1022, 1088, 1011M24, Any Satisfact., n=1077, 1155, 1079M24, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1077, 1155, 1079M36, Any Satisfact., n=1121, 1206, 1131M36, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1121, 1206, 1131M48, Any Satsifact., n=1146,1224,1160M48, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1146, 1224, 1160
Dutasteride 0.5 mg348577655433730425784422785439
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg354536712310763314807314827319
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg333518678333708371724407729431

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 3 (LOCF)

"This 12-item questionnaire (PPSM) was developed by GlaxoSmithKline for use in this study and was designed to quantify the participant's perceptions and satisfaction with the effect of study treatment on control of their urinary symptoms at baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, and 48. Participants were asked to respond to the question of Since you began taking the study medication, how has the strength of your urinary stream changed?." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline (BL), Any Improvement, n=1585, 1601, 1585BL, No Change/Any Worsening, n=1585, 1601, 1585Month (M) 12, Any Improvement, n=1576, 1593, 158M12, No Change/Any Worsening, n=1576, 1593, 1581M24, Any Improvement, n=1576, 1593, 1581M24, No Change/Any Worsening, n=1576, 1593, 1581M36, Any Improvement, n=1576, 1593, 1581M36, No Change/Any Worsening, n=1576, 1593, 1581M48, Any Improvement, n=1576, 1593, 1581M48, No Change/Any Worsening, n=1576, 1593, 1581
Dutasteride 0.5 mg6029991044549107052310715221086507
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg6299561181395121536112063701202374
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg6159701105476105752410235581008573

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 2 (LOCF)

"This 12-item questionnaire (PPSM) was developed by GlaxoSmithKline for use in this study and was designed to quantify the participant's perceptions and satisfaction with the effect of study treatment on control of their urinary symptoms at baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, and 48. Participants were asked to respond to the question of How satisfied are you with the effect of the study medication on control of your urinary problems? Satisfact., satisfaction." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline (BL), Any Satisfact., n=1587, 1600, 1583BL, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1587, 1600, 1583Month (M) 12, Any Satisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581M12, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581M24, Any Satisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581M24, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581M36, Any Satisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581M36, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581M48, Any Satisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581M48, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1576, 1593, 1581
Dutasteride 0.5 mg6529481127466116642711674261172421
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg7078801224352126131512603161267309
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg6868971178403115043111204611088493

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 10 (LOCF)

"This 12-item questionnaire (PPSM) was developed by GlaxoSmithKline for use in this study and was designed to quantify the participant's perceptions and satisfaction with the effect of study treatment on control of their urinary symptoms at baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, and 48. Participants were asked to respond to the question of How satisfied are you with the effect the study medication has on your ability to go about your usual activities without interference from your urinary problems?. Satisfact., satisfaction." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline (BL), Any Satisfact., n=1574, 1600, 1576BL, Neutral /Any Dissatisfact., n=1574, 1600, 1576Month (M) 12, Any Satisfact., n=1575, 1593, 1580M12, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1575, 1593, 1580M24, Any Satisfact., n=1575, 1593, 1580M24, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1575, 1593, 1580M36, Any Satisfact., n=1575, 1593, 1580M36, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1575, 1593, 1580M48, Any Satisfact., n=1575, 1593, 1580M48, Neutral/Any Dissatisfact., n=1575, 1593, 1580
Dutasteride 0.5 mg56510351073520111647710984951123470
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg6119631176399120537012103651213362
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg5849921114466108849210745061043537

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM): Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 12 (LOCF)

"This 12-item questionnaire (PPSM) was developed by GlaxoSmithKline for use in this study and was designed to quantify the participant's perceptions and satisfaction with the effect of study treatment on control of their urinary symptoms at baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, and 48. Participants were asked to respond to the question of Would you ask your doctor for the medication you received in this study?." (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, Yes, n=1560, 1579, 1562Baseline, No/Not Sure, n=1560, 1579, 1562Month 12, Yes, n=1574, 1592, 1581Month 12, No/Not Sure, n=1574, 1592, 1581Month 24, Yes, n=1574, 1592, 1581Month 24, No/Not Sure, n=1574, 1592, 1581Month 36, Yes, n=1574, 1592, 1581Month 36, No/Not Sure, n=1574, 1592, 1581Month 48, Yes, n=1574, 1592, 1581Month 48, No/Not Sure, n=1574, 1592, 1581
Dutasteride 0.5 mg5571022920671955636956636918674
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg587973972602102754710315431003571
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg582980970611952629915666874707

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in BPH Impact Index (BII) at Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

The BII is a 4-item questionnaire, score range of 0 (best) to 12 (worst) for questions 1-3, and 0 (best) to 13 (worst) for question 4, that assesses the overall impact of BPH on a participant's general sense of well being and measures aspects of physical discomfort, worry, and bother, all of which can be affected by BPH and its symptoms. BII score = sum of questions 1-4. Change from baseline = Post-Baseline Value. Estimates are based on the adjusted (least squares) means from the general linear model: change from baseline BII = treatment + cluster + baseline BII. (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionpoints on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 12Month 24Month 36Month 48
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-1.5-1.7-1.8-1.8
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-1.9-2.1-2.2-2.2
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-1.6-1.5-1.3-1.2

[back to top] [back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

The IPSS is a 7-item questionnaire that measures urinary symptoms. It measures the level of urinary symptoms (including incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia) reported as the total IPSS score. Each of the 7 questions has a 6-point response scale (0=none/not at all to 5=almost always) with a total score that can range from 0-35: mild (0-7), moderate (8-19), or severe (20-35). Estimates are based on adjusted (least squares) means from the general linear model: change from baseline IPSS = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline IPSS. (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionpoints on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 12Month 24Month 36Month 48
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-4.2-4.9-5.2-5.3
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-5.6-6.2-6.3-6.3
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-4.5-4.3-4.0-3.8

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Transition Zone (Portion of the Prostate That Surrounds the Proximal Urethra) Volume at Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

Prostate volume (PV) measurements were conducted annually using Transurethral ultrasound (TRUS). The anteroposterior, cephalocaudal, and transverse diameters of the prostate obtained by TRUS calculate the total PV in centimeters (cc). Results are for the transition zone measurements of the prostate in a small subset of participants. Percent change from baseline (BL) = [(post-BL - BL)/BL value] x 100. Estimates are based on the adjusted (least squares) means for the general linear model: log(post-BL/BL value) = treatment + cluster + log(BL value) and are reported as percent change from BL. (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Month 12, n= 150, 159, 160Month 24, n= 153, 164, 160Month 36, n= 155, 164, 162Month 48, n= 155, 164, 163
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-15.6-22.8-26.7-26.5
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-17.2-23.4-20.9-17.9
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg5.68.714.718.2

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax) at Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

Peak maximum urinary flow (Qmax) of urinary flow using a Medtronic (formerly Dantec) Uroflow Meter (Urodyn 1000 or Duet models) with a Thompson filter was measured. Estimates are based on adjusted (least squares) means from the general linear model: Change from baseline Qmax = treatment + cluster + baseline Qmax. (NCT00090103)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36, and 48

,,
Interventionmilliliters (mL)/second (sec) (Least Squares Mean)
Month 12, n=1477, 1482, 1510Month 24, n= 1492, 1501, 1519Month 36, n= 1495, 1504, 1521Month 48, n= 1495, 1505, 1523
Dutasteride 0.5 mg1.51.91.92.0
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg2.02.42.62.4
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg0.90.90.60.7

[back to top]

Effects of Testosterone Gel Alone or in Combination With Oral Dutasteride on Prostate Volume in Hypogonadal Men With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

(NCT00194675)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6

,
Interventioncubic centimeters (Mean)
Baseline, Day 0Month 6
Testosterone Gel + Oral Dutasteride44.438.6
Testosterone Gel + Oral Placebo54.258.3

[back to top]

Serum and Intraprostatic Hormone Levels: Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)

(NCT00194675)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6

,
Interventionng/ ml (Mean)
Baseline PSAMonth 6 PSA
Testosterone Gel + Oral Dutasteride2.11.4
Testosterone Gel + Oral Placebo2.83.1

[back to top]

Serum Hormone Levels: Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, and Dihydrotestosterone(DHT), Dehydroepiandrosterone(DHEA), and Androstenedione.

(NCT00194675)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-months, 6-months

,
Interventionng/ dL (Mean)
Total testosterone, baselineTotal testosterone, month 3Total testosterone, month 6Free testosterone, baselineFree testosterone, month 3Free testosterone, month 6Dihydrotestosterone (DHT), baselineDihydrotestosterone (DHT), month 3Dihydrotestosterone (DHT), month 6Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), baselineDehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), month 3Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), month 6Androstenedione, baselineAndrostenedione, month 3Androstenedione, month 6
Testosterone Gel + Oral Dutasteride2135255344.512.012.32816129910911147140123
Testosterone Gel + Oral Placebo2064944814.211.311.4471451347298974599100

[back to top]

Signs and Symptoms Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): Post-voiding Residual (PVR) Urinary Volume

(NCT00194675)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-months, 6-months

,
Interventioncc (Mean)
Baseline Post Residual Volume (PVR)3 month Post Residual Volume6 month Post Residual Volume
Testosterone Gel + Oral Dutasteride484132
Testosterone Gel + Oral Placebo433639

[back to top]

Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) in Hypogonadal Men (Uroflow)

(NCT00194675)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-months, 6-months

,
Interventioncc/sec (Mean)
Baseline Uroflow, BaselineUroflow after 3 months of treatmentUroflow after 6 months of treatment
Testosterone Gel + Oral Dutasteride13.413.214.6
Testosterone Gel + Oral Placebo13.812.713.8

[back to top]

The Effects of T Alone or in Combination With Dutasteride on Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) in Hypogonadal Men With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. (International Prostate Symptom Score)

International Prostate Symptom Score to assess lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Minimum score = 0, maximum score = 35; mildly symptomatic score = 0-7; moderately symptomatic score = 8-19; severely symptomatic score = 20-35; no subscales. (NCT00194675)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

,
Interventionscore (Mean)
Baseline IPSSMonth 3- IPSSMonth 6 IPSS
Testosterone Gel + Oral Dutasteride13.310.210.3
Testosterone Gel + Oral Placebo13.511.611.1

[back to top]

Prostate Tissue DHT

Tissue dihydrotesterone (DHT) (NCT00298155)
Timeframe: After 12 weeks of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation

Interventionng/g (Mean)
Group 10.03
Group 20.06
Group 30.03

[back to top]

To Determine the Effects of Different Modes of Androgen Deprivation on Serum DHT

Serum DHT (NCT00298155)
Timeframe: After 12 weeks of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Group 14.2
Group 23.6
Group 35.7

[back to top]

Activities of Daily Living, Change From Baseline

Subjects rated their daily activity with a modified 9-question Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire (0-4, fully impaired to normal). (NCT00303446)
Timeframe: 0, 12, and 24 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Activities of Daily Living, Change at 12 monthsActivities of Daily Living, Change at 24 months
Dutasteride0.41.1
Placebo0.41.2

[back to top]

Adult Myopathy Assessment Tool, Change From Baseline

The Adult Myopathy Assessment Tool rates physical function and muscle endurance, with higher scores indicating better performance; it includes 7 timed functional tasks and 6 endurance tasks (0=worst, 45=best). (NCT00303446)
Timeframe: 0, 12, and 24 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Adult Myopathy Assessment Tool, Change at 12 mos.Adult Myopathy Assessment Tool, Change at 24 mos.
Dutasteride-0.7-1.5
Placebo-2.2-2.8

[back to top]

Creatine Kinase, Change From Baseline

Serum creatine kinase was determined in venous blood samples analyzed at the Department of Laboratory Medicine of the NIH Clinical Center. (NCT00303446)
Timeframe: 0, 12, and 24 months

,
InterventionUnits/liter (Mean)
Creatine kinase change at 12 monthsCreatine kinase change at 24 months
Dutasteride-32-62
Placebo-36-19

[back to top]

Timed 2-minute Walk, Change From Baseline

The subjects did the 2-minute walk in a 50-foot (15.2-meter) corridor three times, and the average distance was calculated. The subjects were allowed to use an assistive device and rest between the trials. (NCT00303446)
Timeframe: 0, 12, and 24 months

,
Interventionmeters (Mean)
Timed 2-minute Walk, Change at 12 monthsTimed 2-minute Walk, Change at 24 months
Dutasteride-0.8-1.6
Placebo8.12.2

[back to top]

International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF), Change From Baseline

Sexual function was rated using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). The total IIEF score (5-75, worst-best) was reported as the percent maximum (0-100%). (NCT00303446)
Timeframe: 0, 12, and 24 months

,
Interventionpercent of maximum score (Mean)
IIEF, Change at 12 monthsIIEF, Change at 24 months
Dutasteride-2.1-3.5
Placebo-2.4-0.3

[back to top]

Manual Muscle Testing, Change From Baseline.

Manual muscle testing was performed using a modified Medical Research Council (MRC) scale (0=worst, 5=best); the average muscle score was based on 22 muscle groups. (NCT00303446)
Timeframe: 0, 12, and 24 months

,
InterventionMRC units on a scale (Mean)
Manual Muscle Testing, Change at 12 monthsManual Muscle Testing, Change at 24 months
Dutasteride-0.250.01
Placebo0.040.02

[back to top]

Median Compound Muscle Action Potential, Change From Baseline

Nerve conduction studies were done on the median motor nerve, and the compound muscle action potential amplitude was determined. Loss of amplitude indicates impairment of conduction. (NCT00303446)
Timeframe: 0, 12, and 24 months

,
InterventionmVolts (Mean)
Median Motor Action Potential, Change at 12 monthsMedian Motor Action Potential, Change at 24 months
Dutasteride0.520.24
Placebo0.04-0.24

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) Mental Component Summary, Percent Change From Baseline

Subjects completed the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Version 2 (SF-36v2), in which they rated their mental quality of life over the preceding 4 weeks. Raw SF-36v2 scores were converted to norm-based scales and component summaries using the scoring code provided by QualityMetric (mean=50, standard deviation (SD)=10), and percent change in the norm-based scale was calculated. (NCT00303446)
Timeframe: 0, 12, and 24 months

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
SF-36v2 Mental Component Sum., Change at 12 mos.SF-36v2 Mental Component Sum., Change at 24 mos.
Dutasteride0.1-3.2
Placebo0.63.3

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary, Change From Baseline

Subjects completed the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Version 2 (SF-36v2), in which they rated their physical quality of life over the preceding 4 weeks. Raw SF-36v2 scores were converted to norm-based scales and component summaries using the scoring code provided by QualityMetric (mean=50, standard deviation (SD)=10). (NCT00303446)
Timeframe: 0, 12, and 24 months

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
SF-36v2 Physical Component Sum., Change at 12 mos.SF-36v2 Physical Component Sum., Change at 24 mos.
Dutasteride2.52.1
Placebo-0.9-3.6

[back to top]

Motor Unit Nerve Estimation, Change From Baseline

Motor unit number estimation (MUNE) was done with a statistical MUNE program, on the abductor pollicis brevis. All subjects were evaluated on the right side unless severe atrophy produced very low compound muscle action potentials; in this case, the left side was investigated or the abductor digiti minimi was substituted. A decrease in MUNE indicates a loss of motor units. (NCT00303446)
Timeframe: 0, 12, and 24 months

,
Interventionmotor unit number (Mean)
Motor Unit Nerve Estimation, Change at 12 monthsMotor Unit Nerve Estimation, Change at 24 months
Dutasteride-4.2-2.6
Placebo-4.2-2.2

[back to top]

Muscle Strength Change From Baseline

Quantitative muscle assessment (QMA) was done with a fixed frame dynamometer, a strain gauge tensiometer, and a computer-aided acquisition system. Maximal voluntary isometric muscle contractions were measured twice, the average was calculated, and the results were summed over 22 muscle groups (11 on each side). The total force was scaled for body weight and expressed as percent change from baseline. Measurements were performed at 0, 12, and 24 months. The calculated percent changes at 12 and 24 months are shown. (NCT00303446)
Timeframe: 0, 12, and 24 months

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Muscle Strength Change From Baseline at 12 MonthsMuscle Strength Change From Baseline at 24 Months
Dutasteride3.11.3
Placebo-2.2-4.5

[back to top]

Bulbar Rating Scale, Change From Baseline

The Bulbar Rating Scale includes eight domains each rated on a 1-4 scale, abnormal to normal. The original 8-32 point scale was transformed to a 0-100% scale to represent the responses as percentages. (NCT00303446)
Timeframe: 0, 12, and 24 months

,
Interventionpercentage of maximum score (Mean)
Bulbar Rating Scale, Change at 12 monthsBulbar Rating Scale, Change at 24 months
Dutasteride2.63.9
Placebo5.76.4

[back to top]

Sensory Nerve Action Potential Average, Change From Baseline

Nerve conduction studies were done on four sensory nerves (median, ulnar, radial, sural), and the amplitudes of the evoked responses were averaged. Loss of amplitude indicates impairment of conduction. (NCT00303446)
Timeframe: 0, 12, and 24 months

,
InterventionmicroVolts (Mean)
Sensory Nerve Action Potential, Change at 12 mos.Sensory Nerve Action Potential, Change at 24 mos.
Dutasteride00
Placebo00

[back to top]

Swallow Score Average, Change From Baseline

Modified barium swallow studies were done at 0, 12, and 24 months. Twenty-five domains were assessed, and six were chosen for final analysis based on the abnormal findings in subjects evaluated at baseline: vallecular pooling and repeated-swallow, each assessed with thin liquids, purees, and solids (rated 1-4, abnormal to normal). (NCT00303446)
Timeframe: 0, 12, and 24 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Swallow Score Average, Change at 12 monthsSwallow Score Average, Change at 24 months
Dutasteride0.06-0.14
Placebo-0.25-0.53

[back to top]

Peroneal Compound Muscle Action Potential, Change From Baseline

Nerve conduction studies were done on the peroneal nerve, and the compound muscle action potential amplitude was determined. Loss of amplitude indicates impairment of conduction. (NCT00303446)
Timeframe: 0, 12, and 24 months

,
InterventionmVolts (Mean)
Peroneal Motor Action Potential, Change at 12 mos.Peroneal Motor Action Potential, Change at 24 mos.
Dutasteride0.020.04
Placebo0.160.15

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in MAX-PC Fear of Recurrence Subscale Score (LOCF)

"The MAX-PC fear of recurrence subscale consists of 4 questions related to fear of recurrence; Because cancer is unpredictable, I feel I cannot plan for the future., My fear of having my cancer getting worse gets in the way of my enjoying life., I am afraid of my cancer getting worse., I am more nervous since I was diagnosed with prostate cancer. A higher MAX-PC score indicates greater anxiety. Scores range from 0 to 3 for each question. The total score is the sum of the 4 question scores: 0 to 12." (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36

,
Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Month 3, n=146, 143Month 6, n= 148, 143Month 12, n=148, 143Month 18, n=148, 143Month 18 Take-Home, n=148, 143Month 36, n=148, 143Month 36 Take-Home, n=148, 143
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily-0.0-0.5-0.7-0.7-0.3-0.6-0.7
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily-0.2-0.2-0.1-0.10.00.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Volume at Years 1.5 and 3

"Prostate volume was determined at baseline, Year 1.5, and Year 3. The anteroposterior, cephalocaudal, and transverse diameters of the prostate were obtained by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) to calculate the prostate volume using the following formula:~π/ 6 (anteroposterior width * cephalocaudal width * transverse width). Prostate volume calculated by pre-programmed equipment was unacceptable for the on-study prostate volume measurements." (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline and Years 1.5 and 3

,
Interventioncc (Mean)
Year 1.5, n=117, 117Year 3, n=118, 118
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily-9.5-8.6
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily0.73.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Cumulative Length of Cancer Tumor Core at Years 1.5, 3, and 0-3

All participants were required by protocol to undergo a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsy (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. All biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)

,
Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Year 1.5, n= 87, 99Year 3, n=52, 54Years 0-3 (Final biopsy), n=105, 90
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily2.51.53.8
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily3.91.84.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Number of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy at Years 1.5, 3, and 0-3

All participants were required by protocol to undergo a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsy (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. All biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. Change from baseline was calculated as the number of cancer-positive cores at post-baseline biopsy minus the number of cancer-positive cores at baseline. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)

,
Interventioncores (Mean)
Year 1.5, n= 87, 99Year 3, n=52, 54Years 0-3 (Final biopsy), n=105, 90
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily0.62.02.5
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily1.12.03.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy at Years 1.5, 3, and 0-3

All participants were required by protocol to undergo a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsy (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. All biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. (100 * number of positive cores/number of evaluated cores). (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)

,
Interventionpercentage of cores (Mean)
Year 1.5, n= 87, 99Year 3, n=52, 54Years 0-3 (Final biopsy), n=105, 90
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily3.71.56.0
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily8.44.110.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total FACT-P Score (LOCF)

The FACT-P consists of a total of 39 questions. This scale is divided into five subscales: the Physical Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); the Social/Family Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); the Emotional Well-Being Subscale (6 questions); the Functional Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); and the Prostate Cancer Subscale (12 questions). The questionnaire was administered at baseline and at Months 18 and 36. The score for each of the 39 questions ranges from 0 to 4. The total FACT-P score thus ranges from 0 to156; a higher score indicates better QOL. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 18 and 36

,
Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Month 18, n=144, 140Month 36, n=148, 140
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily-1.2-2.3
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily-4.2-3.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Memorial Anxiety Scale Scores for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) LOCF

The MAX-PC is a self-reported measure evaluating three aspects of PC-related anxiety: general anxiety related to PC/treatment, fear of recurrence, and anxiety related to PSA testing. The MAX-PC consists of 18 questions, each score ranging from 0 (least anxiety) to 3 (maximum anxiety). Total score is the sum of each question score, thus ranging from 0 to 54. A higher MAX-PC score indicates greater anxiety. At Months 18 and 36, participants were given an additional copy of the questionnaire and were asked to complete at home once they were notified of their PSA result and to send back to clinic. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36

,
Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Month 3, n=146, 143Month 6, n=148, 143Month 12, n=148, 143Month 18, n=148, 143Month 18 Take-Home, n=148, 143Month 36, n=148, 143Month 36 Take-Home, n=148, 143
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily0.3-0.8-1.4-1.6-0.6-1.5-1.8
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily0.4-0.0-0.1-0.30.60.50.7

[back to top]

Cumulative Length of Cancer Tumor Core

All participants were required by protocol to undergo a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsy (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. All biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. Tumor length is calculated as the number of cores (12) * total tumor length/number of evaluated cores. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)

,
Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Baseline, n= 155, 147Year 1.5, n=87, 99Year 3, n=52, 54Years 0-3 (Final biopsy), n=105, 90
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily2.14.83.86.1
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily2.06.23.77.0

[back to top]

Mean Percentage of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy

All participants were required by protocol to undergo a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsies (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. All biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. The sum of cancer positive cores and the sum of evaluated cores were used to compute the percentage (100* number of positive cores/number of evaluated cores). (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)

,
Interventionpercentage of cores (Mean)
Baseline, n= 155, 147Year 1.5, n=87, 99Year 3, n=52, 54Years 0-3 (Final biopsy), n=105, 90
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily14.519.017.321.7
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily14.323.716.524.7

[back to top]

Number of Biopsies With the Indicated Clinical Tumor Stage at Baseline

All on-study or for-cause biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathologists recommendations for clinical tumor staging were used. T1c = tumor identified by needle biopsy (e.g., because of elevated prostate-specific antigen [PSA]); T2 = tumor confined within the prostate; T2a = tumor involves one-half of one lobe, but not both lobes of the prostate. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
Interventionbiopsies (Number)
T1cT2aT2c
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily117291
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily125300

[back to top]

Number of Cancer-positive Cores in a 12-core Biopsy

All participants were required by protocol to undergo a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsy (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. All biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. . The final biopsy is defined as the latest post-baseline biopsy for which the results are available from the central pathology laboratory. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 1.5, Year 3, Years 0-3 (Final biopsy)

,
Interventioncores (Mean)
Baseline, n=155, 147Year 1.5, n=87, 99Year 3, n=52, 54Years 0-3 (Final biopsy), n=105, 90
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily1.62.22.02.5
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily1.62.82.03.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Pathologic Progression

Pathological progression is defined as one of the following: >=4 cores involved; >=50% of any 1 core involved; or a Gleason pattern of >=4 as a result of any on-study/for-cause biopsy. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathologists recommendations for Gleason scoring (GS) were used to grade tumors. A primary grade is assigned to the most common tumor pattern, and a second grade to the next most common tumor pattern. The two grades are added together to get a GS. The Gleason grade=1-5, with 5 having the worst prognosis. The Gleason score=2-10, with 10 having the worst prognosis. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Year 1.5 and Overall (Years 0-3)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Year 1.5, n= 136, 139Overall (Years 0-3) n=136, 140
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily2743
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily3951

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Prostate Cancer (PCa) Progression [Restricted Crude Rate Analysis: Number of Participants With PCa Divided by Number of Participants in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population Who Had >=1 Post-baseline Biopsy or Had a Progression

PC progression (prog.) was defined as the earliest occurrence of primary therapy, also referred to as therapeutic prog., for PC (prostatectomy/radiation/hormonal therapy); or pathological prog., defined as 1 of the following: >=4 cores involved; >=50% of any 1 core involved; or a Gleason pattern of >=4 as a result of any on-study/for-cause biopsy. Primary Gleason grade is assigned to the most common tumor pattern; a second grade to the next most common tumor pattern. The two grades are added together to get a score. Gleason grade= 1-5; Gleason score=2-10; 5 and 10 indicate worst prognosis. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Year 1.5 and Overall (Years 0-3)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Year 1.5, n=144, 142Overall (Years 0-3), n= 155, 147
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily3254
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily5071

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Gleason Score (GS) on Repeat Biopsy at Year 1.5

The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathologists recommendations for Gleason scoring were used to grade tumors. A primary grade is assigned to the most common tumor pattern (how the cancer cells look under a microscope), and a second grade to the next most common pattern. The two grades are added together to get a GS. Gleason grade range= 1-5; 5=worst prognosis. GS range=2-10; 10=worst prognosis. Improvement is defined as a decrease in GS from a baseline score of 6 (GS<=6; includes no cancer); worsening is defined as an increase in GS from a baseline score of 6 (GS >6). (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Year 1.5

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ImprovementNo changeWorsening
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily215821
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily65124

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Gleason Score on Repeat Biopsy at Years 0-3

The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathologists recommendations for Gleason scoring were used to grade tumors. A primary grade is assigned to the most common tumor pattern (how the cancer cells look under a microscope), and a second grade to the next most common pattern. The two grades are added together to get a GS. Gleason grade range= 1-5; 5=worst prognosis. GS range=2-10; 10=worst prognosis. Improvement is defined as a decrease in GS from a baseline score of 6 (GS<=6; includes no cancer); worsening is defined as an increase in GS from a baseline score of 6 (GS >6). (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Years 0-3 (Final Biopsy)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ImprovementNo cancer, GS 0No changeWorsening
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily50507119
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily31318322

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Total Gleason Score

All on-study or for-cause biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathologists recommendations for Gleason scoring were used to grade the tumor. A primary grade is assigned to the most common tumor pattern (how the cancer cells look under a microscope), and a secondary grade to the next most common tumor pattern. The two grades are added together to get a GS. The Gleason grade ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 having the worst prognosis. The Gleason score ranges from 2 to 10, with 10 having the worst prognosis. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Years 0-3 (Final Biopsy)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Missing (No Cancer)GS 5GS 6GS 7, 3 (primary grade) + 4 (secondary grade)GS 7, 4 (primary grade) + 3 (secondary grade)GS 8GS 9-10
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily5007113420
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily3108315430

[back to top]

Number of Post-baseline Biopsies With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Clinical Stage

"All on-study or for-cause biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. The National Comprehensive Network (NCCN), 2005 clinical practices guidelines in Oncology-prostate cancer were used for clinical tumor staging. T0: no evidence of primary tumor; T1: clinically inapparent tumor, neither palpable nor visible by imaging; T2: tumor confined within the prostate; T3: tumor extends through the prostate capsule; T4: tumor is fixed or invades adjacent structures other than seminal vesicles. A clinical stage of T0 in post-baseline biopsies has been interpreted as No Worsening." (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Months 0-18

,
Interventionbiopsies (Number)
No Worsening (same/lower stage)Worsening (higher stage)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily535
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily5313

[back to top]

Participants With at Least One Post-baseline Biopsy With the Indicated Prostate Cancer (PCa) Diagnosis

All participants were required by protocol to undergo a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsy (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. If a for-cause biopsy occurred within 6 months prior to the protocol-mandated biopsy, the biopsy was counted as the protocol-mandated biopsy. All biopsies were reviewed and analyzed by a central pathologist. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 18

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with a PCa diagnosisParticipants with no PCa diagnosis
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily11129
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily11125

[back to top]

Participants With at Least One Post-baseline Biopsy With the Indicated Prostate Cancer (PCa) Diagnosis for Their Final Biopsy

All participants were required by protocol to undergo a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy at 1.5 and 3 years or at the end of the study, if the participant discontinued the study early. Any for-cause biopsy (outside of protocol-mandated biopsies) 12 cores were obtained. If a for-cause biopsy occurred within 6 months prior to the protocol-mandated biopsy, the biopsy was counted as the protocol-mandated biopsy. The final biopsy is defined as the latest post-baseline biopsy for which the results are available from the central pathology laboratory. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Years 0-3

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with a PCa diagnosisParticipants with no PCa diagnosis
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily9050
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily10531

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Prostate Volume at Years 1.5 and 3

"Prostate volume was determined at baseline, Year 1.5, and Year 3. The anteroposterior, cephalocaudal, and transverse diameters of the prostate were obtained by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) to calculate the prostate volume using the following formula:~π/ 6 (anteroposterior width * cephalocaudal width * transverse width). Prostate volume calculated by pre-programmed equipment is unacceptable for the on-study prostate volume measurements." (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline and Years 1.5 and 3

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Year 1.5, n=117, 117Year 3, n=118, 118
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily-19.8-18.0
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily3.77.7

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total FACT-P Score (LOCF)

The FACT-P consists of a total of 39 questions. This scale is divided into five subscales: the Physical Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); the Social/Family Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); the Emotional Well-Being Subscale (6 questions); the Functional Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); and the Prostate Cancer Subscale (12 questions). The questionnaire was administered at baseline and at Months 18 and 36. The score for each of the 39 questions ranges from 0 to 4. The total FACT-P score thus ranges from 0 to156; a higher score indicates better QOL. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 18 and 36

,
Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Month 18, n=144, 140Month 36, n=148, 140
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily-0.2-1.0
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily-2.8-1.8

[back to top]

Prostate Volume (PV) LOCF

"Prostate volume was determined at baseline, at Year 1.5, and at Year 3. The anteroposterior, cephalocaudal, and transverse diameters of the prostate were obtained by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) to calculate the prostate volume using the following formula:~π/ 6 (anteroposterior width * cephalocaudal width * transverse width). Prostate volume calculated by pre-programmed equipment is unacceptable for the on-study prostate volume measurements." (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline and Years 1.5 and 3

,
Interventioncubic centimeters (cc) (Mean)
Baseline, n=133, 126Year 1.5, n=117, 117Year 3, n=118, 118
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily43.243.343.1
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily44.243.143.0

[back to top]

Total Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale, Prostate Module (FACT-P) Score

The FACT-P consists of a total of 39 questions. This scale is divided into five subscales: the Physical Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); the Social/Family Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); the Emotional Well-Being Subscale (6 questions); the Functional Well-Being Subscale (7 questions); and the Prostate Cancer Subscale (12 questions). The score for each of the 39 questions ranges from 0 to 4. The total FACT-P score thus ranges from 0 to156; a higher score indicates better quality of life. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 18 and 36

,
Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Baseline, n=154, 145Month 18, n=145, 140Month 36, n=149, 140
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily131.3130.2129.0
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily129.9126.9126.6

[back to top] [back to top]

Total MAX-PC Fear of Recurrence Subscale Score

"The MAX-PC fear of recurrence subscale consists of 4 questions related to fear of recurrence; Because cancer is unpredictable, I feel I cannot plan for the future., My fear of having my cancer getting worse gets in the way of my enjoying life., I am afraid of my cancer getting worse., I am more nervous since I was diagnosed with prostate cancer. A higher MAX-PC score indicates greater anxiety. Scores range from 0 to 3 for each question. The total score is the sum of the 4 question scores: 0 to 12." (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36

,
Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Baseline, n=151, 146Month 3, n=150, 144Month 6, n=152, 144Month 12, n=152, 144Month 18, n=152, 144Month 18 Take-Home, n=152, 144Month 36, n=152, 144
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily3.43.32.92.62.73.02.7
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily3.43.23.33.23.33.43.4

[back to top]

Total Memorial Anxiety Scale Scores for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC)

The MAX-PC is a self-reported measure evaluating three aspects of PC-related anxiety: general anxiety related to PC/treatment, fear of recurrence, and anxiety related to PSA testing. The MAX-PC consists of 18 questions, each score ranging from 0 (least anxiety) to 3 (maximum anxiety). Total score is the sum of each question score, thus ranging from 0 to 54. A higher MAX-PC score indicates greater anxiety. At Months 18 and 36, participants were given an additional copy of the questionnaire and were asked to complete at home once they were notified of their PSA result and to send back to clinic. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3, 6, 12, 18, and 36

,
Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Baseline, n=151, 146Month 3, n=150, 144Month 6, n=152, 144Month 12, n=152, 144Month 18, n=152, 144Month 18 Take-Home, n=152, 144Month 36, n=152, 144Month 36 Take-Home, n=152, 144
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily11.311.410.49.79.510.69.69.4
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily11.011.410.910.710.511.411.311.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FACT-P Physical Well-Being Subscale Score (LOCF)

"The FACT-P Physical Well-Being subscale is divided into 7 questions, and the participants rated the outcome over the past 7 days; I have a lack of energy., I have nausea., Because of my physical condition, I have trouble meeting the needs of my family., I have pain., I am bothered by side effects of treatment., I feel ill., I am forced to spend time in bed. The score for each question ranges from 0 to 4; a lower score indicates better physical well-being. The total FACT-P score thus ranges from 0 to156; a higher score indicates a better quality of life." (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 18 and 36

,
Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Month 18, n=148, 140Month 36, n=149, 140
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily-0.2-0.3
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily-0.4-0.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Therapeutic Progression

Primary therapy, also referred to as therapeutic progression, for prostate cancer can be one of the following: prostatectomy, radiation, or hormonal therapy. (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Year 1.5 and Overall (Years 0-3)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Year 1.5Overall (Years 0-3)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily511
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily1120

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FACT-P Social Well-Being Subscale Score (LOCF)

"The FACT-P Social Well-Being subscale is divided into 7 questions, and the participants rated the outcome over the past 7 days; I feel close to my friends., I get emotional support from my family., I get support from my friends., My family has accepted my illness., I am satisfied with family communication about my illness., I feel close to my partner (or the person who is my main support)., I am satisfied with my sex life. The score for each question ranges from 0 to 4; a higher score indicates better social well-being. The total FACT-P score thus ranges from 0 to 156." (NCT00363311)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 18 and 36

,
Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Month 18, n=148, 140Month 36, n=149, 140
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Once Daily-0.6-1.2
Matching Placebo 0.5 mg Once Daily-1.4-1.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With IPSS Improvement From Baseline at Week 52

Improvement is defined as greater than or equal to a 2 point increase in participants total score on the I-PSS questionaire. (NCT00368979)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Improvement >=2 PointsImprovement >=3 PointsImprovement >=4 PointsImprovement >=5 PointsImprovement >=6 PointsImprovement >=20%Improvement >=25%Improvement >=30%Improvement >=40%Improvement >=50%Improvement >=75%
Dutasteride1391281159482122114106866717
Placebo11310282756299847154397

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Qmax Improvement From Baseline at Week 52

Improvement was defined as an increase in Qmax by greater than or equal to 1 mL/sec (NCT00368979)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Improvement >=1 mL/secImprovement >=2 mL/secImprovement >=2.5 mL/secImprovement >=3 mL/secImprovement >=4 mL/secImprovement >=5 mL/secImprovement >=10 mL/secImprovement >=30%
Dutasteride10386737053441163
Placebo795645442922441

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 52

The International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) consists of 7 verified questions concerning urinary symptoms and one quality of life question scored from 0 to 5(0=Not at All, to 5=Almost Always). The total score can range from 0 to 35. Score of 1-7=Mild, 8-19=Moderate, 20-35=Severe. (NCT00368979)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-3.6
Dutasteride-5.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Maximum Urine Flow Rate (Qmax) at Week 52

Maximum Urine Flow Rate (Qmax) is the peak flow in milliliters per second. (NCT00368979)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionmilliliters per second (mL/sec) (Mean)
Placebo0.6
Dutasteride2.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Prostate Volume at Week 52

Prostate volume measurements by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Average prostate volume (55cc). The Ultrasound scans the prostate in the transverse plane while moving in the cephalocaudal direction of the prostate. The height and width of the prostate section with the greatest surface area is recorded. (NCT00368979)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventioncubic centimeters (cc) (Mean)
Placebo-8.9
Dutasteride-31.5

[back to top]

Primary Outcome Measure Will be the 5 Point Change in AUA Symptom Index

AUA symptoms index change is measured on a five level-scale: -2 (much worse), -1(worse) , 0 (no change), 1 (better), 2 (much better) (NCT00431626)
Timeframe: one year

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Laser TURP With Dutasteride1

[back to top]

Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?

GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index with Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions comparing photographs of their hair before treatment and concerning the last week and evaluated the change in Hair Growth. (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Much less scalp (Month 3)Moderately less scalp (Month 3)Slightly less scalp (Month 3)The same amount of scalp (Month 3)Slightly more scalp (Month 3)Moderately more scalp (Month 3)Much more scalp (Month 3)Much less scalp (Month 6)Moderately less scalp (Month 6)Slightly less scalp (Month 6)The same amount of scalp (Month 6)Slightly more scalp (Month 6)Moderately more scalp (Month 6)Much more scalp (Month 6)
Dutasteride12320251570022217284
Placebo13142423732521281711

[back to top]

Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?

GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index without Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions without photographs concerning their perception of Change in Hair Growth. (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Much less hair (Month 3)Moderately less hair (Month 3)Slightly less hair (Month 3)The same amount of hair (Month 3)Slightly more hair (Month 3)Moderately more hair (Month 3)Much more hair (Month 3)Much less hair (Month 6)Moderately less hair (Month 6)Slightly less hair (Month 6)The same amount of hair (Month 6)Slightly more hair (Month 6)Moderately more hair (Month 6)Much more hair (Month 6)
Dutasteride5826321109132425200
Placebo472636200782235300

[back to top]

Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Kept What Hair I Had?

GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index without Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions without photographs concerning their perception of Change in Hair Growth. (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
I strongly disagree (Month 3)I disagree (Month 3)No opinion either way (Month 3)I agree(Month 3)I strongly agree (Month 3)I strongly disagree (Month 6)I disagree (Month 6)No opinion either way (Month 6)I agree (Month 6)I strongly agree(Month 6)
Dutasteride045622033607
Placebo0811560089580

[back to top]

Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?

GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index without Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions without photographs concerning their perception of Change in Hair Growth. (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Much worse (Month 3)Moderately worse (Month 3)Slightly worse (Month 3)Not Changed (Month 3)Slightly Better (Month 3)Moderately Better (Month 3)Much Better (Month 3)Much worse (Month 6)Moderately worse (Month 6)Slightly worse (Month 6)Not changed (Month 6)Slightly Better (Month 6)Moderately Better (Month 6)Much Better (Month 6)
Dutasteride00136257401223261110
Placebo0144720300010332930

[back to top]

Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Usual Hair Loss Has Slowed Down?

GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index without Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions without photographs concerning their perception of Change in Hair Growth. (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
I strongly disagree (month 3)I disagree (month 3)No opinion either way (month 3)I agree (month 3)I strongly agree (month 3)I strongly disagree (month 6)I disagree (month 6)No opinion either way (month 6)I agree (month 6)I strongly agree (month 6)
Dutasteride0182034101812403
Placebo1301330102717292

[back to top]

Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection

"In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? For example, No Problem shift to No Problem indicates that the participant experienced no problem at baseline and no problem at Month 6, respectively." (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
No Problem shift to No ProblemNo Problem shift to Very Small ProblemNo Problem shift to Small ProblemNo Problem shift to Medium ProblemNo Problem shift to Big ProblemVery Small Problem shift to No ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Very Small ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Small ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Medium ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Big ProblemSmall Problem shift to No ProblemSmall Problem shift to Very Small ProblemSmall Problem shift to Small ProblemSmall Problem shift to Medium ProblemSmall Problem shift to Big ProblemMedium Problem shift to No ProblemMedium Problem shift to Very Small ProblemMedium Problem shift to Small ProblemMedium Problem shift to Medium ProblemMedium Problem shift to Big ProblemBig Problem shift to No ProblemBig Problem shift to Very Small ProblemBig Problem shift to Small ProblemBig Problem shift to Medium ProblemBig Problem shift to Big Problem
Dutasteride53631020210201100000000000
Placebo52530033000114101000000000

[back to top]

Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation

"In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? For example, No Problem shift to No Problem indicates that the participant experienced no problem at baseline and no problem at Month 6, respectively." (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
No Problem shift to No ProblemNo Problem shift to Very Small ProblemNo Problem shift to Small ProblemNo Problem shift to Medium ProblemNo Problem shift to Big ProblemVery Small Problem shift to No ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Very Small ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Small ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Medium ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Big ProblemSmall Problem shift to No ProblemSmall Problem shift to Very Small ProblemSmall Problem shift to Small ProblemSmall Problem shift to Medium ProblemSmall Problem shift to Big ProblemMedium Problem shift to No ProblemMedium Problem shift to Very Small ProblemMedium Problem shift to Small ProblemMedium Problem shift to Medium ProblemMedium Problem shift to Big ProblemBig Problem shift to No ProblemBig Problem shift to Very Small ProblemBig Problem shift to Small ProblemBig Problem shift to Medium ProblemBig Problem shift to Big Problem
Dutasteride54521033100101100000000000
Placebo54530031010123100000000000

[back to top]

Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive

"In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? For example, No Problem shift to No Problem indicates that the participant experienced no problem at baseline and no problem at Month 6, respectively." (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
No Problem shift to No ProblemNo Problem shift to Very Small ProblemNo Problem shift to Small ProblemNo Problem shift to Medium ProblemNo Problem shift to Big ProblemVery Small Problem shift to No ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Very Small ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Small ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Medium ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Big ProblemSmall Problem shift to No ProblemSmall Problem shift to Very Small ProblemSmall Problem shift to Small ProblemSmall Problem shift to Medium ProblemSmall Problem shift to Big ProblemMedium Problem shift to No ProblemMedium Problem shift to Very Small ProblemMedium Problem shift to Small ProblemMedium Problem shift to Medium ProblemMedium Problem shift to Big ProblemBig Problem shift to No ProblemBig Problem shift to Very Small ProblemBig Problem shift to Small ProblemBig Problem shift to Medium ProblemBig Problem shift to Big Problem
Dutasteride53621000310312000000000000
Placebo52440040100123201000000000

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Hair Growth Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (Hair Count) in the Vertex at 6 Months.

The Macrophotographic hair count method marks a 1-inch diameter circular area at the anterior leading edge of the vertex thinning area and then photographed. The photographs are enlarged and converted into dot maps and the dot maps are converted into total hair counts by means of personal computer-based scanners and imaging software. (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

,
Interventionhair count per centimeters squared (Mean)
BaselineMonth 6Change from Baseline - Month 6
Dutasteride148.14162.2712.21
Placebo144.27149.574.67

[back to top]

Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.

Normal ranges: TSH, 0.25-3.50 µIU/mL; T4, 4.5-12.0 mg/dL; PSA, ≤4 ng/mL; DHT, males (m): prepuberty, <0.1, adult, 0.25-0.75; females (f): prepuberty, <0.03, premenopausal, 0.05-0.3, menopausal, <0.03 ng/mL; T, m: 2.36-9.96; f: 0.08-0.86 ng/mL; LH, m: 1-8; f: follicular, 4-12; periovulatory, >20; luteal 5-20; postmenopausal, >10 IU/L. (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
TSH - Baseline - NormalTSH - Baseline - AbnormalTSH - Month 6 - NormalTSH - Month 6 - AbnormalTSH - Month 10 - NormalTSH - Month 10 - AbnormalT4 - Baseline - NormalT4 - Baseline - AbnormalT4 - Month 6 - NormalT4 - Month 6 - AbnormalT4 - Month 10 - NormalT4 - Month 10 - AbnormalPSA - Screening - NormalPSA - Screening - AbnormalPSA - Month 6 - NormalPSA - Month 6 - AbnormalPSA - Month 10 - NormalPSA - Month 10 - AbnormalDHT - Screening - NormalDHT - Screening - AbnormalDHT - Month 6 - NormalDHT - Month 6 - AbnormalDHT - Month 10 - NormalDHT - Month 10 - AbnormalTestosterone - Screening - NormalTestosterone - Screening - AbnormalTestosterone - Month 6 - NormalTestosterone - Month 6 - AbnormalTestosterone - Month 10 - NormalTestosterone - Month 10 - AbnormalLH - Baseline - NormalLH - Baseline - Abnormal
Dutasteride703700711730700720730700720721691702730673693676
Placebo7506947417507127417507307507416947237417127416411

[back to top]

Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline

Improvement Distribution is based on the number of hairs per centimeters squared by macrophotographic conversion hair count. Score Range -3=greatly decreased to +3=greatly increased. 0=No change. (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Greatly decreased (Month 3)Moderately decreased (Month 3)Slightly decreased (Month 3)No Change (Month 3)Slightly increased (Month 3)Moderately increased (Month 3)Greatly increased (Month 3)Greatly decreased (Month 6)Moderately decreased (Month 6)Slightly decreased (Month 6)No Change (Month 6)Slightly increased (Month 6)Moderately increased (Month 6)Greatly increased (Month 6)
Dutasteride0102835810042431122
Placebo01133030100816361410

[back to top]

Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive

"In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? For example, No Problem shift to No Problem indicates that the participant experienced no problem at baseline and no problem at Month 6, respectively." (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 10

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
No Problem shift to No ProblemNo Problem shift to Very Small ProblemNo Problem shift to Small ProblemNo Problem shift to Medium ProblemNo Problem shift to Big ProblemVery Small Problem shift to No ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Very Small ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Small ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Medium ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Big ProblemSmall Problem shift to No ProblemSmall Problem shift to Very Small ProblemSmall Problem shift to Small ProblemSmall Problem shift to Medium ProblemSmall Problem shift to Big ProblemMedium Problem shift to No ProblemMedium Problem shift to Very Small ProblemMedium Problem shift to Small ProblemMedium Problem shift to Medium ProblemMedium Problem shift to Big ProblemBig Problem shift to No ProblemBig Problem shift to Very Small ProblemBig Problem shift to Small ProblemBig Problem shift to Medium ProblemBig Problem shift to Big Problem
Dutasteride57500021100311100000000000
Placebo55302040100133101000000000

[back to top]

Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection

"In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? For example, No Problem shift to No Problem indicates that the participant experienced no problem at baseline and no problem at Month 6, respectively." (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 10

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
No Problem shift to No ProblemNo Problem shift to Very Small ProblemNo Problem shift to Small ProblemNo Problem shift to Medium ProblemNo Problem shift to Big ProblemVery Small Problem shift to No ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Very Small ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Small ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Medium ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Big ProblemSmall Problem shift to No ProblemSmall Problem shift to Very Small ProblemSmall Problem shift to Small ProblemSmall Problem shift to Medium ProblemSmall Problem shift to Big ProblemMedium Problem shift to No ProblemMedium Problem shift to Very Small ProblemMedium Problem shift to Small ProblemMedium Problem shift to Medium ProblemMedium Problem shift to Big ProblemBig Problem shift to No ProblemBig Problem shift to Very Small ProblemBig Problem shift to Small ProblemBig Problem shift to Medium ProblemBig Problem shift to Big Problem
Dutasteride54630023000301000000000000
Placebo54501024000222101000000000

[back to top]

Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation

"In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? For example, No Problem shift to No Problem indicates that the participant experienced no problem at baseline and no problem at Month 6, respectively." (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 10

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
No Problem shift to No ProblemNo Problem shift to Very Small problemNo Problem shift to Small ProblemNo Problem shift to Medium ProblemNo Problem shift to Big ProblemVery Small Problem shift to No ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Very Small ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Small ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Medium ProblemVery Small Problem shift to Big ProblemSmall Problem shift to No ProblemSmall Problem shift to Very Small ProblemSmall Problem shift to Small ProblemSmall Problem shift to Medium ProblemSmall Problem shift to Big ProblemMedium Problem shift to No ProblemMedium Problem shift to Very Small ProblemMedium Problem shift to Small ProblemMedium Problem shift to Medium ProblemMedium Problem shift to Big ProblemBig Problem shift to No ProbleBig Problem shift to Very Small ProblemBig Problem shift to Small ProblemBig Problem shift to Medium ProblemBig Problem shift to Big Problem
Dutasteride56230125000201000000000000
Placebo56600031010231100000000000

[back to top]

Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation

In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Screening

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sex Drive - No ProblemSex Drive - Very Small ProblemSex Drive - Small ProblemSex Drive - Medium ProblemSex Drive - Big ProblemErection - No ProblemErection - Very Small ProblemErection - Small ProblemErection - Medium ProblemErection - Big ProblemEjaculation - No ProblemEjaculation - Very Small ProblemEjaculation - Small ProblemEjaculation - Medium ProblemEjaculation - Big Problem
Dutasteride605440627400646300
Placebo585930606720634710

[back to top]

Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation

In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Month 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sex Drive - No ProblemSex Drive - Very Small ProblemSex Drive - Small ProblemSex Drive - Medium ProblemSex Drive - Big ProblemErection - No ProblemErection - Very Small ProblemErection - Small ProblemErection - Medium ProblemErection - Big ProblemEjaculation - No ProblemEjaculation - Very Small ProblemEjaculation - Small ProblemEjaculation - Medium ProblemEjaculation - Big Problem
Dutasteride567720576630588420
Placebo596820589710598620

[back to top]

Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation

In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Month 3

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sex Drive - No ProblemSex Drive - Very small ProblemSex Drive - Small ProblemSex Drive - Medium ProblemSex Drive - Big ProblemErection - No ProblemErection - Very Small ProblemErection - Small ProblemErection - Medium ProblemErection - Big ProblemEjaculation - No ProblemEjaculation - Very Small ProblemEjaculation - Small ProblemEjaculation - Medium ProblemEjaculation - Big Problem
Dutasteride49125505211260559340
Placebo5985015610331598321

[back to top]

Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation

In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Month 10

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sex Drive - No ProblemSex Drive - Very Small ProblemSex Drive - Small ProblemSex Drive - Medium ProblemSex Drive - Big ProblemErection - No ProblemErection - Very Small ProblemErection - Small ProblemErection - Medium ProblemErection - Big ProblemEjaculation - No ProblemEjaculation - Very Small ProblemEjaculation - Small ProblemEjaculation - Medium ProblemEjaculation - Big Problem
Dutasteride627210599400607401
Placebo62643060112206210120

[back to top]

Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation

In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sex Drive - No ProblemSex Drive - Very small problemSex Drive - Small problemSex Drive - Medium problemSex Drive - Big problemErection - No ProblemErection - Very small problemErection - Small problemErection - Medium problemErection - Big problemEjaculation - No ProblemEjaculation - Very small problemEjaculation - Small problemEjaculation - Medium problemEjaculation - Big problem
Dutasteride634600645400637300
Placebo605810606710625700

[back to top]

Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening

"Improvement Distribution is based on the number of hairs per centimeters squared by macrophotographic conversion hair count.~Score Range -3=greatly decreased to +3=greatly increased. 0=No change." (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 3 and Baseline to Month 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Greatly decreased (Month 3)Moderately decreased (Month 3)Slightly decreased (Month 3)No change (Month 3)Slightly increased (Month 3)Moderately increased (Month 3)Greatly increased (Month 3)Greatly decreased (Month 6)Moderately decreased (Month 6)Slightly decreased (Month 6)No Change (Month 6)Slightly increased (Month 6)Moderately increased (Month 6)Greatly increased (Month 6)
Dutasteride013283380006402052
Placebo0014292840142932810

[back to top]

Laboratory Values: Other Chemistry Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.

Glucose, Creatinine, Ferritine (ug/L) and Zinc (Hmol/L) (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Glucose - BaselineGlucose - Month 6Creatinine - BaselineCreatinine - Month 6Ferritine (ug/L) - BaselineFerritine (ug/L) - Month 6Zinc (Hmol/L) - BaselineZinc (Hmol/L) - Month 6
Dutasteride104.48104.491.031.05100.21109.61111.19118.07
Placebo101.56106.311.031.06131.91132.36112.66113.87

[back to top]

Laboratory Values: Liver Enzymes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.

sGOT (AST)- serum Glutamic-Oxaloacetic Transaminase, sGPT (ALT) - serum Glutamic-Pyruvic Transaminase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Bilirubin(mg/dL) and Albumin(g/dL) (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

,
InterventionIU/L (Mean)
AST(SGOT) - BaselineAST(SGOT) - Month 6ALT(SGPT) - BaselineALT(SGPT) - Month 6Alkaline Phosphatase - BaselineAlkaline Phosphatase - Month 6Bilirubin (mg/dL) - BaselineBilirubin (mg/dL) - Month 6Albumin (g/dL) - BaselineAlbumin (g/dL) - Month 6
Dutasteride23.1025.8829.7934.0087.3485.510.780.804.664.64
Placebo22.8025.1126.9130.4785.7984.240.710.794.604.60

[back to top]

Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.

Comparing Lab values and differences from Baseline to month 6 (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

,
Interventionthousands/microliter (Mean)
WBC - BaselineWBC - Month 6Neutrophils - BaselineNeutrophils - Month 6Lymphocytes - BaselineLymphocytes - Month 6Monocytes - BaselineMonocytes - Month 6Eosinophils - BaselineEosinophils - Month 6Basophils - BaselineBasophils - Month 6Platelets - BaselinePlatelets - Month 6Hemoglobin (%)- BaselineHemoglobin (%) - Month 6MCV (fL)- BaselineMCV (fL) - Month 6
Dutasteride6898.496463.6153.4652.4735.9636.967.037.082.812.750.480.50249.63243.6915.4415.4192.1291.57
Placebo6336.936387.0353.5252.9035.8736.037.037.142.692.990.520.51250.19240.2615.5415.4691.8991.44

[back to top]

Laboratory Values: Electrolytes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.

Sodium, Potassium (mEq/L), and Bicarbonate (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Sodium - BaselineSodium - Month 6Potassium (mEq/L) - BaselinePotassium (mEq/L) - Month 6Bicarbonate - BaselineBicarbonate - Month 6
Dutasteride141.23141.544.224.2527.6626.61
Placebo141.41141.584.344.2928.2327.08

[back to top]

The Percentage Change From Baseline in Testosterone at Month 3, 6, and 10

Mean percent change from Baseline for testosterone. Testosterone was measured in ng/ml. (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Month 3, Month 6, and Month 10

,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
% Change in Testosterone - Month 3% Change in Testosterone - Month 6% Change in Testosterone - Month 10
Dutasteride18.788.1512.18
Placebo-5.27-6.590.99

[back to top]

The Percentage Change From Baseline in Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Month 3, 6, and 10

Mean percent change from Baseline for DHT. DHT was measured in pg/ml. Change from baseline = Month 3, 6, and 10 values minus baseline value. (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Month 3, Month 6 and Month 10

,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
% Change in DHT - Month 3% Change in DHT - Month 6% Change in DHT - Month 10
Dutasteride-16.92-4.303.85
Placebo-1.9022.837.58

[back to top]

Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?

GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index with Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions comparing photographs of their hair before treatment and concerning the last week and evaluated the change in Hair Growth. (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Much less scalp (month 3)Moderately less scalp (month 3)Slightly less scalp (month 3)The same amount of scalp (month 3)Slightly more scalp (month 3)Moderately more scalp (month 3)Much more scalp (month 3)Much less scalp (month 6)Moderately less scalp (month 6)Slightly less scalp (month 6)The same amount of scalp (month 6)Slightly more scalp (month 6)Moderately more scalp (month 6)Much more scalp (month 6)
Dutasteride101725143139162620110
Placebo311172614402515262241

[back to top]

Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?

GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index with Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions comparing photographs of their hair before treatment and concerning the last week and evaluated the change in Hair Growth. (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Greatly decreased (Month 3)Moderately decreased (Month 3)Slightly decreased (Month 3)Stayed the same (Month 3)Slightly increased (Month 3)Moderately increased (Month 3)Greatly increased (Month 3)Greatly decreased (Month 6)Moderately decreased (Month 6)Slightly decreased (Month 6)Stayed the same (Month 6)Slightly increased (Month 6)Moderately increased (Month 6)Greatly increased (Month 6)
Dutasteride02717261560002222236
Placebo011921211032422261821

[back to top]

Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?

GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index with Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions comparing photographs of their hair before treatment and concerning the last week and evaluated the change in Hair Growth. (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Much Worse (Month 3)Moderately Worse (Month 3)Slightly Worse (Month 3)Not Changed (Month 3)Slightly Better (Month 3)Moderately Better (Month 3)Much Better (Month 3)Much Worse (Month 6)Moderately Worse (Month 6)Slightly Worse (Month 6)Not Changed (Month 6)Slightly Better (Month 6)Moderately Better (Month 6)Much Better (Month 6)
Dutasteride022162814110002124199
Placebo0192824941220252322

[back to top]

Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvements From Baseline Score

Improvement Distribution Score is based on the number of hairs per centimeters squared by macrophotographic conversion hair count. Score Range: -3 = greatly decreased to +3 = greatly increased. 0 = No change. (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Month 3 Mean ScoreMonth 6 Mean Score
Dutasteride0.780.88
Placebo0.19-0.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Hair Growth Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (Hair Count) in the Vertex at 3 Months.

The Macrophotographic hair count method marks a 1-inch diameter circular area at the anterior leading edge of the vertex thinning area and then photographed. The photographs are enlarged and converted into dot maps and the dot maps are converted into total hair counts by means of personal computer-based scanners and imaging software. (NCT00441116)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3

,
Interventionhair count per centimeters squared (Mean)
BaselineMonth 3Change from Baseline - Month 3
Dutasteride148.14160.197.58
Placebo144.27154.5010.24

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression

Time to disease progression (PD) is defined as the interval of time between the date of the start of treatment and the date of PD. PD is defined as prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression from Baseline (PSA value is 25% and at least 2 nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL] above Baseline, confirmed by a second PSA value); PSA progression from nadir, without a 50% decrease from Baseline (PSA value is 25% and at least 2 ng/mL above nadir, confirmed by a second PSA value); PSA progression from nadir, with a 50% or more decrease from Baseline (PSA value is 50% and at least 2 ng/mL above nadir, confirmed by a second PSA value); metastatic disease (radiographic evidence of metastatic disease); death due to prostate cancer; or the receipt of post-Baseline rescue medication. PSA confirmation was not required if no subsequent PSA values were available. Participants who did not experience an event were censored at the date of the latest follow-up information. (NCT00470834)
Timeframe: Interval of time between the date of the start of treatment and the date of disease progression (up to Study Month 42)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Placebo376.9
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Dutasteride 3.5 mg433.1

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to treatment failure is defined as the interval of time between the date of the start of treatment and the date of treatment failure. Treatment failure is defined as PSA progression from Baseline (PSA value is 25% and at least 2 ng/mL above Baseline, confirmed by a second PSA value); metastatic disease (radiographic evidence of metastatic disease); death due to prostate cancer; or receipt of post-baseline rescue medications. PSA confirmation was not required if no subsequent PSA values were available. Participants who did not experience an event were censored at the date of the latest follow-up information. (NCT00470834)
Timeframe: Interval of time between the date of the start of treatment and the date of treatment failure (up to Study Month 42)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Placebo368.4
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Dutasteride 3.5 mg457.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Metastatic Disease

Metastatic disease is that evidenced by a radiographic assessment. The time of metastatic disease was the date of radiographic evidence. (NCT00470834)
Timeframe: Interval of time between the date of the start of treatment and the date of radiographic evidence of metastatic disease (up to Study Month 42)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Months 1-18, n=65, 62Months 19-42, n=26, 30Overall (Months 1-42), n=65, 62
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Dutasteride 3.5 mg516
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Placebo819

[back to top]

Number of Participants With PSA Response

PSA response is defined as a 50% or greater decrease in PSA from Baseline, confirmed by a second PSA measurement. The time of this response was the date of the first PSA measurement that showed a 50% or greater decrease from the Baseline PSA measurement. PSA confirmation was not required if no subsequent PSA values were available. (NCT00470834)
Timeframe: Time from Baseline PSA measurement until the first PSA measurement with a 50% or greater reduction in PSA values (up to Study Month 42)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Months 1-18, n=65, 62Months 19-42, n=4, 7Overall (Months 1-42), n=65, 62
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Dutasteride 3.5 mg38038
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Placebo37037

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total PSA at Months 6, 12, 18, 21, and 42

Change from Baseline in total PSA was measured at each scheduled post-baseline visit using a general linear model with effects for treatment and Baseline total PSA. Analysis was done using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach, in which missing post-Baseline values were imputed with earlier non-missing values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT00470834)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 6, 12, 18, 21, and 42

,
InterventionNanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Median)
Month 6, n=62, 61Month 12, n=62, 61Month 18, n=62, 61Month 21, n=26, 30Month 42, n=26, 30
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Dutasteride 3.5 mg-2.2-2.1-1.7-1.80.6
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Placebo-2.0-1.7-1.2-2.1-0.1

[back to top]

Androstenedione (AED)

(NCT00490555)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

Interventionng/mL (Median)
1) Placebo0.9
2) Testosterone Gel0.9
3) T Gel +Dutasteride1.8
4) T Gel+ DMPA0.7

[back to top]

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)

(NCT00490555)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

Interventionng/mL (Median)
1) Placebo4.3
2) Testosterone Gel3.5
3) T Gel +Dutasteride3.8
4) T Gel+ DMPA3.2

[back to top]

Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Concentration

(NCT00490555)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

Interventionng/mL (Median)
1) Placebo0.5
2) Testosterone Gel1.8
3) T Gel +Dutasteride0.5
4) T Gel+ DMPA0.6

[back to top]

Testosterone Concentration

(NCT00490555)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

Interventionng/mL (Median)
1) Placebo4.0
2) Testosterone Gel4.4
3) T Gel +Dutasteride7.0
4) T Gel+ DMPA1.8

[back to top]

Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA)

PSA level week 10 end of treatment (NCT00490555)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

Interventionng/mL (Median)
1) Placebo0.8
2) Testosterone Gel0.9
3) T Gel +Dutasteride0.7
4) T Gel+ DMPA0.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in the Prostate Volume at Month 3

Percent change from baseline was calculated as the prostate volume at Month 3 minus the volume at baseline, divided by the prostate volume at baseline and multiplied by 100. Prostate volume was measured by transrectal ultrasound. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3

Interventionpercent change in volume (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-12.02
Placebo-1.02

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in the Prostate Volume at Month 6

Percent change from baseline was calculated as the prostate volume at Month 6 minus the volume at baseline, divided by the prostate volume at baseline and multiplied by 100. Prostate volume was measured by transrectal ultrasound. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionpercent change in volume (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-17.00
Placebo-2.77

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in the Serum DHT at Month 3

Percent change from baseline was calculated as the DHT at Month 3 minus the value at baseline, divided by the baseline value and multiplied by 100. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-59.15
Placebo28.33

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in the Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Month 6

Percent change from baseline was calculated as serum DHT at month 6 minus the value at baseline ,divided by the baseline value and multiplied by 100. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-52.53
Placebo26.78

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Qmax at Month 3

Change from baseline was calculated as Qmax at Month 3 minus Qmax at baseline. Qmax is the peak urinary flow measured by a uroflow meter. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3

Interventionml/s (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.93
Placebo0.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Qmax at Month 6

Change from baseline was calculated as Qmax at Month 6 minus Qmax at baseline. Qmax is the peak urinary flow measured by a uroflow meter. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionmilliliters/second (ml/s) (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.75
Placebo0.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the AUA-SI Score at Month 3

Change from baseline was calculated as the AUA-SI score at month 3 minus the baseline score. AUA-SI is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses the severity of benign prostate hyperplasia symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 35; mild, 0-7; moderate, 8-19; severe, 20-35. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-2.9
Placebo-2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the AUA-SI Score at Month 6

Change from baseline was calculated as the AUS-SI score at month 6 minus the baseline score. AUA-SI is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses the severity of benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 35; mild, 0-7; moderate, 8-19; severe, 20-35. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-4.9
Placebo-4.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Prostate Volume at Month 3

Change from baseline was calculated as the prostate volume at Month 3 minus the volume at baseline. Prostate volume is measured by transrectal ultrasound. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3

Interventioncubic centimeters (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-7.11
Placebo-1.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Prostate Volume at Month 6

Change from baseline was calculated as the prostate volume at Month 6 minus the volume at baseline. Prostate volume was measured by transrectal ultrasound. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventioncubic centimeters (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-9.16
Placebo-1.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Serum DHT at Month 3

Change from baseline was calculated as the value of DHT at Month 3 minus the baseline value. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-319.605
Placebo-34.400

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Serum DHT at Month 6

Change from baseline was calculated as the value of DHT at Month 6 minus the baseline value. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionpicograms/milliliter (pg/ml) (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-289.175
Placebo-46.099

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Maximum Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax) at Month 6

Percent change from baseline was calculated as Qmax at Month 6 minus Qmax at baseline, divided by baseline Qmax and multiplied by 100. Qmax is the peak urinary flow measured by a uroflow meter. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg16.14
Placebo6.31

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Qmax at Month 3

Percent change from baseline was calculated as Qmax at Month 3 minus Qmax at baseline, divided by baseline Qmax and multiplied by 100. Qmax is the peak urinary flow measured by a uroflow meter. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg14.34
Placebo5.85

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) Score at Month 6

Percent change from baseline is calculated as the AUA-SI score at month 6 minus the baseline AUA-SI score, divided by the baseline score and multiplied by 100. AUA-SI is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses the severity of benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 35; mild, 0-7; moderate, 8-19; severe, 20-35. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-26.48
Placebo-20.79

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in the AUA-SI Score at Month 3

Percent change from baseline is calculated as the AUA-SI score at month 3 minus the baseline AUA-SI score, divided by the baseline score and multiplied by 100. AUA-SI is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses the severity of benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 35; mild, 0-7; moderate, 8-19; severe, 20-35. (NCT00527605)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-15.64
Placebo-11.91

[back to top]

Time to PSA Progression (in Days)

A participant was designated as having PSA progression if there existed a post-baseline PSA value (within treatment period, typically up to 24-month evaluations) that was >10 ng/ml if radical prostatectomy or >20 ng/ml if primary radiotherapy and PSA >=1.5 times the baseline PSA value, or 0NCT00558363)
Timeframe: up to 28 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo368.0
Dutasteride 0.5 mg368.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With PSA Progression

A participant was designated as having a PSA progression if there existed a post-baseline PSA value (within treatment period, typically up to 24-month evaluations) that was (>10 ng/ml if radical prostatectomy or >20 ng/ml if primary radiotherapy) and PSA >=1.5 times the baseline PSA value), or 0NCT00558363)
Timeframe: up to 28 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
With PSA progressionWithout PSA progression
Dutasteride 0.5 mg19127
Placebo25119

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) Evaluation Changing From Normal/Diffusely Enlarged at Baseline to Focal Abnormality at Any Time Post-baseline

Participants underwent a digital rectal examination to evaluate for focal abnormality of the prostate. (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: Baseline; up to 28 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo10
Dutasteride 0.5 mg8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Change in PSA Doubling Time (PSADT) From Baseline at Month 12, Month 24, and End-of-treatment (up to 28 Months)

Participants with improvement included those whose PSADT at a specified visit was positive but more than the baseline PSADT, whose PSA at the visit was the same as the baseline PSA, or whose PSA at the visit was less than the baseline PSA. Participants with worsening included those whose PSADT at the visit was positive but less than the baseline PSADT. (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: Baseline; Month 12, Month 24, End-of-Treatment (up to 28 months)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 12, Worsening; n=110, 123Month 12, No change; n=110, 123Month 12, Improvement; n=110, 123Month 24, Worsening; n=76, 110Month 24, No change; n=76, 110Month 24, Improvement; n=76, 110End-of treatment, Worsening; n=144, 144End-of treatment, No change; n=144, 144End-of treatment, Improvement; n=144, 144
Dutasteride 0.5 mg7011630107190125
Placebo200907069370107

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Threshold Vital Signs at Baseline and Any Time Post-baseline

Threshold vital signs are defined as follows: < 80 mmHg or > 165 mmHg for systolic blood pressure; < 40 mmHg or > 105 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure, < 40 beats per minute (bpm) or > 100 bpm for heart rate. (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: Baseline; up to 28 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BaselineAny time post-baseline
Dutasteride 0.5 mg1536
Placebo1837

[back to top]

Percent Change in PSA From Nadir PSA at Months 12 and 24

Percent change from nadir PSA at Month X = 100*(Month X PSA - nadir PSA)/Nadir PSA. Nadir PSA was reported by the site as the lowest historical PSA value after the radical therapy. A nadir value below the detection level was captured as 0.0. The missing PSA value for scheduled visits could have been replaced by non-missing PSA values within 30 days after the clinic visit date. If such replacement was not possible, the latest non-missing post-baseline PSA before the scheduled visit was used for the scheduled visit PSA (Last Observation Carried Forward). (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: Baseline; Months 12 and 24

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Month 12Month 24
Dutasteride 0.5 mg2120.72927.2
Placebo2810.34036.1

[back to top]

Percent Change in Total PSA From Baseline at Months 12 and 24

Percent change in PSA from baseline at Month X = 100*(Month X PSA - Baseline PSA)/Baseline PSA. The missing PSA value for scheduled visits could have been replaced by non-missing PSA values within 30 days after the clinic visit date. If such replacement was not possible, the latest non-missing post-baseline PSA before the scheduled visit was used for the scheduled visit PSA (Last Observation Carried Forward). (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: Baseline; Months 12 and 24

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Month 12Month 24
Dutasteride 0.5 mg11.886.2
Placebo93.1197.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Shift From Normal at Baseline to at Least One Abnormal Laboratory Value for Any Parameter Any Time During the Study

A participant has a normal value for a laboratory parameter if the value is within the low and high range of normal provided by the laboratory. Each laboratory parameter is evaluated for shift from normal at baseline to abnormal any time post-baseline. A participant with any laboratory parameter showing this shift is counted. A participant is counted only once even if he had such a shift in more than one laboratory parameter or more than once among all post-baseline evaluations. (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: Baseline; up to 28 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo74
Dutasteride 0.5 mg64

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression From Baseline (in Days)

Time to disease progression is defined as the number of days between baseline and the first occurrence of any of the following: PSA doubling time (PSADT)<=91 days, PSA value is at least 50% more than baseline value (>20 nanogram/milliliter [ng/ml] for primary radiotherapy group or >10 ng/ml for radical prostatectomy group), rescue treatment, cancer-positive biopsy, cancer-positive bone scan. (Confirmation of PSA criteria is required in an immediate subsequent PSA, if available, and PSA values for consideration are restricted to treatment period, typically up to 24-month evaluations.) (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: up to 28 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo365.0
Dutasteride 0.5 mg285.0

[back to top]

Time to PSA Rise From Baseline (in Days)

A participant was designated as having a PSA rise if there existed a post-baseline PSA value (within treatment period, typically up to 24-month evaluations) that was >1.15 times the baseline PSA value, and all subsequent PSA values were >1.15 times the baseline PSA value. The study day for the first PSA evaluation that qualified for analysis of PSA rise was used for time to PSA rise. If none of the post-baseline PSA values qualified for analysis of PSA rise during the study, time to PSA rise was censored at the last post-baseline PSA evaluation. (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: up to 28 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo100.0
Dutasteride 0.5 mg279.0

[back to top]

Change in PSA From Nadir PSA at Months 12 and 24

Change from nadir PSA at Month X = Month X PSA - nadir PSA. Nadir PSA was reported by the site as the lowest historical PSA value after the radical therapy. A nadir value below the detection level was captured as 0.0. The missing PSA value for scheduled visits could have been replaced by non-missing PSA values within 30 days after the clinic visit date. If such replacement was not possible, the latest non-missing post-baseline PSA before the scheduled visit was used for the scheduled visit PSA (Last Observation Carried Forward). (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: Baseline; Months 12 and 24

,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Month 12Month 24
Dutasteride 0.5 mg3.54.9
Placebo4.76.3

[back to top]

Change in Total PSA From Baseline at Months 12 and 24

Change in PSA from baseline at Month X = Month X PSA - Baseline PSA. The missing PSA value for scheduled visits could have been replaced by non-missing PSA values within 30 days after the clinic visit date. If such replacement was not possible, the latest non-missing post-baseline PSA before the scheduled visit was used for the scheduled visit PSA (Last Observation Carried Forward). (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: Baseline; Months 12 and 24

,
Interventionnanograms/milliliter (ng/ml) (Mean)
Month 12Month 24
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.92.3
Placebo2.33.9

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants Classified as Treatment Responders at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

Treatment responders at Month X were defined as participants (par.) with either a PSA decrease or an increase <=15% from baseline to Month X confirmed in all PSA measurements between baseline (BL) and Month X. (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 3, n=141, 141Month 6, n=131, 135Month 9, n=121, 129Month 12, n=110, 124Month 15, n=100, 121Month 18, n=95, 120Month 21, n=83, 112Month 24, n=76, 110
Dutasteride 0.5 mg117105958782767062
Placebo6436221310876

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a PSA Rise From Baseline

A participant was designated as having a PSA rise if there existed a post-baseline PSA value (within treatment period, typically up to 24-month evluations) that was >1.15 times the baseline PSA value, and all subsequent PSA values were >1.15 times the baseline PSA value. (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: up to 28 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
With PSA riseWithout PSA rise
Dutasteride 0.5 mg7274
Placebo12717

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Threshold Laboratory Value for Any Parameter at Baseline (BL) and Any Time Post-baseline

Threshold laboratory values are defined in terms of a multiplicative factor of the testing laboratory's normal range, pre-specified in the analysis plan. A laboratory value that is above the upper limit factor multiplied by the upper limit of the normal range is considered a high threshold value. A laboratory value that is below the lower limit factor multiplied by the lower limit of the normal range is considered a low threshold value. (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: Baseline; up to 28 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Threshold at BLNon-threshold at BL; threshold at any time post-BL
Dutasteride 0.5 mg95
Placebo511

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Disease Progression

Disease progression is defined as the first occurrence of any of the following: PSADT<=91 days, PSA value is at least 50% more than baseline value (>20 ng/ml for primary radiotherapy group or >10 ng/ml for radical prostatectomy group), rescue treatment, cancer-positive biopsy, cancer-positive bone scan. If one of the PSA criteria is qualifying (within treatment period, typically up to 24-month evaluations), an immediate subsequent PSA, if available, must confirm either criterion (or at least 85% of the qualifying value). (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: up to 28 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
With disease progressionWithout disease progression
Dutasteride 0.5 mg25121
Placebo4995

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Nipple Tenderness (NT) at Baseline (BL) and Any Time Post-baseline

Participants underwent clinical examination of the breasts, to evaluate for nipple tenderness. Clinical significance of the results was determined by subjective judgment of the clinical personnel performing the examination. (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: Baseline; up to 28 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BL; NT, n=147, 147BL; Clinically significant (CS) NT, n=0, 3No NT at BL, but NT at any time post-BL, n=147,147CS change in NT; BL to any time post-BL, n=8, 11
Dutasteride 0.5 mg30111
Placebo0080

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Doubling From Baseline (in Days)

Time to PSA doubling is defined as the number of days between the baseline date and the study day of the first post-baseline PSA evaluation date (within treatment period, typically up to 24-month evaluations) on which the PSA value was at least twice as much as the baseline PSA value, and the immediate subsequent value, if available, was at least 85% of two times the baseline value. Participants who never achieved PSA doubling were censored at the last post-baseline, non-missing PSA evaluation. (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: up to 28 months

,
Interventiondays (Median)
Participants (par.) with PSA doubling; n=82, 41Par. without PSA doubling (censored); n=62, 105
Dutasteride 0.5 mg458.0NA
Placebo365.5NA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Palpable Breast Tissue (PBT) at Baseline (BL) and Any Time Post-baseline

Participants underwent clinical examination of the breasts, to evaluate for palpable breast tissue. Clinical significance of the results was determined by subjective judgment of the clinical personnel performing the examination. (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: Baseline; up to 28 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BL; PBT, n=147, 147BL; Clinically significant (CS) PBT, n=6, 4No BL PBT, but PBT at any time post-BL, n=147,147CS change in PBT; BL to any time post-BL, n=10, 21
Dutasteride 0.5 mg40214
Placebo60100

[back to top]

Number of Participants With PSA Doubling From Baseline

PSA doubling is defined as the first post-baseline PSA value (within treatment period, typically up to 24-month evaluations) that was at least twice as much as the baseline PSA value and was confirmed as such (at least 85% of two times the baseline PSA value) in the immediate subsequent PSA value if one is available. (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: up to 28 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
With PSA doublingWithout PSA doubling
Dutasteride 0.5 mg41105
Placebo8262

[back to top]

Number of Participants With PSA Doubling From Baseline During Year 1

PSA doubling is defined as the first post-baseline PSA value (within treatment period, typically up to 12-month evaluations) that was at least twice as much as the baseline PSA value and was confirmed as such (at least 85% of two times the baseline PSA value) in the immediate subsequent PSA value if one is available. (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: up to 16 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
With PSA doublingWithout PSA doubling
Dutasteride 0.5 mg15131
Placebo5094

[back to top]

Time to PSA Doubling From Baseline (in Days) Within Year 1

Time to PSA doubling is defined as the number of days between the baseline date and the study day of the first post-baseline PSA evaluation date within Year 1 (Y1; within treatment period, typically up to 12-month evaluations) on which the PSA value was at least twice as much as the baseline PSA value, and the immediate subsequent value, if available, was at least 85% of two times the baseline value. (NCT00558363)
Timeframe: up to 16 months

,
Interventiondays (Median)
Participants with PSA doubling in Y1; n=50, 15Participants without PSA doubling in Y1: n=94, 131
Dutasteride 0.5 mg183.0NA
Placebo273.5NA

[back to top]

Determination of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Doubling Time During First Off-cycle

"Calculation of number of months when baseline PSA doubles compared between the 2 arms at the end of off-treatment cycle 1." (NCT00668642)
Timeframe: At month 9 and ongoing monthly until end of off-cycle 1 defined by when the testosterone level reaches normal (approximately 6 months)

InterventionMonths (Mean)
A: Dutasteride During First Off-Cycle1.42
B: Placebo During First Off-Cycle1.56

[back to top]

Relative Expression of U19 Gene in Tumor From Prostate Gland During First Off-cycle.

"Calculation of the level of gene expression of the U19 tumor suppressor gene compared between the 2 arms at the end of off-treatment cycle 1." (NCT00668642)
Timeframe: At the end of off-cycle 1 defined by when the testosterone level reaches normal (approximately 6 months)

InterventionRelative expression (Mean)
A: Dutasteride During First Off-Cycle0.24
B: Placebo During First Off-Cycle0.28

[back to top]

PSA Response

PSA decline of 50% from baseline confirmed by a PSA at least 4 weeks later. (NCT00673127)
Timeframe: From treatment initiation until treatment cessation. Maximum 32 months. Median treament duration 8 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
KHAD56

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Duration of time from treatment initiation until documented progression (PSA or Disease progression) (NCT00673127)
Timeframe: Duration of time from treatment initiation until documented progression. Maximum 32 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
KHAD14.5

[back to top]

Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Over Time

(NCT00706966)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Dutasteride - Baseline33.5
Dutasteride - 1 Month5.2
Dutasteride - 3 Months2.5
Dutasteride - 6 Months2.5

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Symptom Indices Over Time - IIEF-5

The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) is an abridged five-item version of the original IIEF 15-item questionnaire designed to evaluate erectile function, based on a definition arrived at by the National Institutes of Health Consensus Panel. Each of 5 questions about erectile function over the past 6 months is scored by the patient from 1 (severe dysfunction) to 5 (little or no dysfunction). The IIEF-5 is scored from 5 to 25, with lower scores indicating erectile dysfunction: 22-25 = No erectile dysfunction; 17-21 = Mild erectile dysfunction; 12-16 = Mild to moderate erectile dysfunction; 8-11 = Moderate erectile dysfunction; 5-7 = Severe erectile dysfunction (NCT00706966)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Dutasteride - Baseline16.4
Dutasteride - 1 Month17.0
Dutasteride - 3 Months16.0
Dutasteride - 6 Months15.3

[back to top]

Symptom Indices Over Time - IPSS

IPSS (The International Prostate Symptom Score) is a symptom index based on seven questions concerning urinary symptoms (1 Incomplete emptying, 2 Frequency, 3 Intermittency, 4 Urgency, 5 Weak Stream, 6 Straining, 7 Nocturia) for which the patient chooses one out of six answers indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom, ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 5(Almost always). The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). Mild (symptom score less than of equal to 7); Moderate (symptom score range 8-19); Severe (symptom score range 20-35). (NCT00706966)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Dutasteride - Baseline8.8
Dutasteride - 1 Month6.6
Dutasteride - 3 Months7.9
Dutasteride - 6 Months5.9

[back to top]

Total PSA Over Time

(NCT00706966)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Dutasteride - Baseline5.44
Dutasteride - 1 Month4.33
Dutasteride - 3 Months2.85
Dutasteride - 6 Months2.59

[back to top]

Change in Extent of Cancer

Proportion of voxels consistent with prostate cancer as measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI). MRSI spectra were examined and scored as healthy or cancerous. The change in cancerous volumes over time was evaluated. Because a significant decrease in citrate and polyamines on MRSI spectra was noted at 1 month compared with baseline, healthy tissue appeared to be more like cancer and thus created a false impression that the cancer had grown after 1 month. To reduce this bias, primary comparisons were made between the 1-month and 6-month scans. (NCT00706966)
Timeframe: 1 month, 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
30-45% DecreaseNo change (95 - 100%)65-167% Increase
Dutasteride324

[back to top]

Testosterone Over Time

(NCT00706966)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Dutasteride - Baseline356.5
Dutasteride - 1 Month418.4
Dutasteride - 3 Months443.2
Dutasteride - 6 Months484.3

[back to top]

Adverse Events Indicative of Safety of Dutasteride

Toxicities from Dutasteride were recorded at each study visit and assessed by NCI-CTCAE v3.0. (NCT00706966)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Dutasteride5

[back to top]

BAES Sedation Response, Average of 6 Time Points

Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) Sedation items - sum of subjective responses - 0(not at all)to 10 (extremely)- for 7 sedation related questions regarding effects of alcohol. Total BAES sedation subscale score 0-70 with higher numbers indicating greater sedative effects of alcohol. [Martin, C. S., M. Earleywine, R. E. Musty, M. W. Perrine and R. M. Swift (1993a). Development and validation of the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 17(1): 140-6.] (NCT00734656)
Timeframe: 40, 80, 120, 160, 210 and 240 minutes after start of drinking

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Medication + Placebo Alcohol0.7
Placebo Medication + 0.8 gr/kg Ethanol8.9
4 mg Dutasteride + Placebo Alcohol1.5
4 mg Dutasteride + 0.8 mg/kg Ethanol7.4

[back to top]

BAES Stimulation Response, Average of 6 Time Points

Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES)Simulation items - sum of subjective responses - 0(not at all)to 10 (extremely)- for 7 stimulation related questions regarding effects of alcohol. Total BAES stimulation subscale score 0-70 with higher numbers indicating greater stimulating effects of alcohol. [Martin, C. S., M. Earleywine, R. E. Musty, M. W. Perrine and R. M. Swift (1993a). Development and validation of the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 17(1): 140-6.] (NCT00734656)
Timeframe: 40, 80, 120, 160, 210 and 240 minutes after start of drinking

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Medication + Placebo Alcohol0.7
Placebo Medication + 0.8 gr/kg Ethanol4.2
4 mg Dutasteride + Placebo Alcohol1.7
4 mg Dutasteride + 0.8 mg/kg Ethanol4.8

[back to top]

Breath Alcohol

Breath Alcohol level (NCT00734656)
Timeframe: 40 minutes after beginning drink

Interventiongr/dL (Mean)
Placebo Medication + Placebo Alcohol0.001
Placebo Medication + 0.8 gr/kg Ethanol0.075
4 mg Dutasteride + Placebo Alcohol0.001
4 mg Dutasteride + 0.8 mg/kg Ethanol0.071

[back to top]

Change in Serum 3a-androstanediol Glucuronide

Ratio of serum 3a-androstanediol drawn prior to alcohol administration (2-4 days after medication administration) compared to the baseline level prior to medication dose. The pharmacologic effect of dutasteride was measured by assay of serum 5a-androstan-3a,17b-diol,17-glucuronide (aka 3a-androstanediol glucuronide) as a biochemical measure of 5a-reductase enzyme inhibition. 3a-androstanediol glucuronide is the primary metabolic excretion product of 3a,5a-androstane neuroactive steroids. The (NCT00734656)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre medication administration) and 2-4 days post-medication (alcohol session)

Interventionratio (Mean)
Placebo Medication + Placebo Alcohol1.04
Placebo Medication + 0.8 gr/kg Ethanol1.11
4 mg Dutasteride + Placebo Alcohol0.31
4 mg Dutasteride + 0.8 mg/kg Ethanol0.31

[back to top]

Post-void Residual (PVR) Volume

To evaluate the safety of dutasteride 0.5 mg in combination with either tolterodine ER 4mg or placebo for the treatment of men with symptoms of LUTS: post-voiding residual volume measured via ultrasound. (NCT00939120)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionmL (Mean)
Tolterodine ER 4mg + Dutasteride 0.5mg101.7
Placebo + Dutasteride 0.5mg75.8

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)

To evaluate the efficacy in men taking dutasteride 0.5 mg in combination with either tolterodine ER 4mg or placebo for the treatment of men with LUTS including OAB symptoms: participant reported patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC), one question scored from 1-6, higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. (NCT00939120)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tolterodine ER 4mg + Dutasteride 0.5mg3.6
Placebo + Dutasteride 0.5mg3.0

[back to top]

Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OABq)

To evaluate the efficacy in men taking dutasteride 0.5 mg in combination with either tolterodine ER 4mg or placebo for the treatment of men with LUTS including OAB symptoms: overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq) - 33 questions scored via 1-6 (higher scores indicate more severe symptoms), thus values ranged from 33-198. (NCT00939120)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tolterodine ER 4mg + Dutasteride 0.5mg80.2
Placebo + Dutasteride 0.5mg67.7

[back to top]

International Prostate Symptoms Score, Voiding Subscore

To evaluate the efficacy in men taking dutasteride 0.5 mg in combination with either tolterodine ER 4mg or placebo for the treatment of men with LUTS including OAB symptoms: voiding subscore of international prostate symptoms score (IPSS) - 4 questions scored from 0-5 (higher score indicating more severe symptoms), thus total scores ranged from 0-20. (NCT00939120)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tolterodine ER 4mg + Dutasteride 0.5mg7.5
Placebo + Dutasteride 0.5mg7.0

[back to top]

International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), Total

To evaluate the efficacy in men taking dutasteride 0.5 mg in combination with either tolterodine ER 4mg or placebo for the treatment of men with LUTS including OAB symptoms: total international prostate symptoms score (IPSS) - 7 questions scored from 0-5 (higher score indicating more severe symptoms), thus total scores ranged from 0-35. (NCT00939120)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tolterodine ER 4mg + Dutasteride 0.5mg15.4
Placebo + Dutasteride 0.5mg14.5

[back to top]

International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), Storage Subscore

To evaluate the efficacy in men taking dutasteride 0.5 mg in combination with either tolterodine ER 4mg or placebo for the treatment of men with LUTS including OAB symptoms: storage subscore international prostate symptoms score (IPSS) - 3 questions scored from 0-5 (higher score indicating more severe symptoms), thus total scores ranged from 0-15. (NCT00939120)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tolterodine ER 4mg + Dutasteride 0.5mg7.9
Placebo + Dutasteride 0.5mg7.5

[back to top]

Acute Urinary Retention (AUR)

To evaluate the safety of dutasteride 0.5 mg in combination with either tolterodine ER 4mg or placebo for the treatment of men with symptoms of LUTS: acute urinary attention (AUR) - inability to urinate requiring catheterization. (NCT00939120)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tolterodine ER 4mg + Dutasteride 0.5mg0
Placebo + Dutasteride 0.5mg0

[back to top]

Maximum Urine Flow Rate (Qmax).

To evaluate the safety of dutasteride 0.5 mg in combination with either tolterodine ER 4mg or placebo for the treatment of men with symptoms of LUTS: maximum urine flow rate (Qmax) measured via uroflowmetry. (NCT00939120)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionmL/sec (Mean)
Tolterodine ER 4mg + Dutasteride 0.5mg11.7
Placebo + Dutasteride 0.5mg12.9

[back to top]

Urine Voided Volume (Voiding)

To evaluate the safety of dutasteride 0.5 mg in combination with either tolterodine ER 4mg or placebo for the treatment of men with symptoms of LUTS: urine voided volume (voiding) measured by uroflowmetry. (NCT00939120)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionmL (Mean)
Tolterodine ER 4mg + Dutasteride 0.5mg219.9
Placebo + Dutasteride 0.5mg232.9

[back to top]

Lapatinib Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) [Phase I]

"A DLT is defined as an adverse event (AE) occurring during the first cycle of KHLAD treatment that are determined to related to the Lapatinib or the combination as follows:~Any Grade 3 or greater non-hematological treatment related (possible, probable, or definite attribution) including diarrhea~Grade 4 or greater for hematological toxicities, regardless of attribution.~Grade 3 skin reactions, pulmonary reactions, regardless of attribution." (NCT00953576)
Timeframe: The evaluation for DLT occurred continuously through one cycle of treatment (28 days).

Interventionparticipants with DLT (Number)
Phase I Dose Level 1: KHAD+L (250 mg)0
Phase I Dose Level 2: KHAD+L (500 mg)2

[back to top] [back to top]

Lapatinib Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) [Phase I]

The MTD of lapatinib in combination with KHAD is determined by the number of participants who experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at the various dose levels of lapatinib under evaluation. See subsequent primary outcome measure for the DLT definition. The MTD is defined as the lapatinib dose at which fewer than one-third of patients experience a DLT. If no DLTs are observed, the MTD is not reached and the Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D) will be based on safety and pharmacokinetic results. (NCT00953576)
Timeframe: The evaluation for MTD occurred continuously through one cycle of KHLAD treatment (28 days).

Interventionmg 1x daily (Number)
All Phase I Participants KHAD+LNA

[back to top]

Plasma Lapatinib Levels [Phase I]

Plasma lapatinib levels were measured after day 28 of KHLAD treatment. Participants were instructed to fast prior to samples being taken. (NCT00953576)
Timeframe: After first 28 days of KHLAD treatment

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Phase I Dose Level 1: KHAD+L (250 mg)731
Phase I Dose Level 2: KHAD+L (500 mg)1506

[back to top]

Intratesticular Testosterone (IT-T) Level

(NCT01215292)
Timeframe: 10 days

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Acyline + Testosterone Gel + Placebo14
Acyline + Tgel + Ketoconazole 400mg3.7
Acyline + Tgel + Ketoconazole 800mg1.7
Acyline & TGel & Dutasteride 2.5mg18.4
Acyline & TGel & Anastrazole 1mg24.0

[back to top]

Intratesticular Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) Level

(NCT01215292)
Timeframe: 10 days

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Acyline + Testosterone Gel (Tgel)+ Placebo3.17
Acyline & TGel & Ketoconazole 400 mg2.08
Acyline & TGel & Ketoconazole 800 mg1.46
Acyline & TGel & Dutasteride0.12
Acyline & TGel & Anastrazole3.63

[back to top]

Intratesticular Androstenedione (ADD) Level

(NCT01215292)
Timeframe: 10 days

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Acyline + Testosterone Gel (Tgel)+ Placebo.87
Acyline + Tgel + Ketoconazole 400mg0.5
Acyline + Tgel + Ketoconazole 800mg0.12
Acyline & TGel & Dutasteride 2.5mg1.7
Acyline & TGel & Anastrazole 1mg3.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hair Growth Index (HGI) Scores at Weeks 12 and 24

"Participant-perceived change in HG was assessed by 3 questions (each scored on a 7-point scale) on a health outcome questionnaire: Since the start of treatment, when I look at my thinning area, I can see..., Since the start of treatment, my hair now covers…, and Since the start of treatment, the appearance (thickness/quality/amount) of the thinning area on my head is… -3, Much less; -2, Moderately less; -1, Slightly less; 0, The same amount; 1, Slightly more; 2, Moderately more; 3, Much more scalp. The scores for the 3 questions were summed to obtain the HGI total score (-9 to 9)." (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12, n=171, 171, 172, 166, 160Week 24, n=172, 174, 177, 167, 165
Dutasteride 0.02 mg0.91.1
Dutasteride 0.1 mg1.72.8
Dutasteride 0.5 mg2.03.2
Finasteride 1 mg1.72.5
Placebo1.21.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Investigator Photographic Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ) Scores Assessed at Week 12 for Vertex and Frontal Views Separately

The IPAQ was completed by the Investigator or designee by comparing the global photographs obtained at Baseline with those obtained at Week 12. This assessment was made separately based on the global photography of the vertex and frontal views. The change from Baseline in hair growth was assessed using the following 7-point scale: -3 = greatly decreased, -2 = moderately decreased, -1 = slightly decreased, 0 = no change, +1 = slightly increased, +2 = moderately increased, +3 = greatly increased. (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Vertex viewFrontal view
Dutasteride 0.02 mg0.350.33
Dutasteride 0.1 mg0.620.54
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.780.55
Finasteride 1 mg0.700.55
Placebo0.480.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Investigator Photographic Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ) Scores Assessed at Week 24 for Vertex and Frontal Views Separately

The IPAQ was completed by the Investigator or designee by comparing the global photographs obtained at Baseline with those obtained at Week 12. This assessment was made separately based on the global photography of the vertex and frontal views. The change from Baseline in hair growth was assessed using the following 7-point scale: -3 = greatly decreased, -2 = moderately decreased, -1 = slightly decreased, 0 = no change, +1 = slightly increased, +2 = moderately increased, +3 = greatly increased. (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Vertex viewFrontal view
Dutasteride 0.02 mg0.370.28
Dutasteride 0.1 mg1.030.78
Dutasteride 0.5 mg1.301.11
Finasteride 1 mg1.070.88
Placebo0.360.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Width Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MT

The target area hair width was the sum of all nonvellus hairs (>=30 µm in width; thick and noticeable hair) within a target 1.13 cm (0.44 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph. A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at Baseline so that the same area could be identified at Baseline and post-Baseline. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure it was visible for subsequent photographs. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 12 or Week 24 value minus the Baseline value. (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

,,,,
Interventionmillimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12, n=152, 154, 155, 149, 134Week 24, n=152, 158, 159, 152, 142
Dutasteride 0.02 mg0.10.1
Dutasteride 0.1 mg0.70.8
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.91.2
Finasteride 1 mg0.60.8
Placebo-0.1-0.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Width Within a 2.54 cm (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MT

The target area hair width was the sum of all nonvellus hairs (>=30 µm in width; thick and noticeable hair) within a target 2.54 cm (1 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph. A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at Baseline so that the same area could be identified at Baseline and post-Baseline. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure it was visible for subsequent photographs. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 12 or Week 24 value minus the Baseline value. (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

,,,,
Interventionmillimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12, n=147, 144, 151, 145, 131Week 24, n=148, 155, 158, 150, 141
Dutasteride 0.02 mg0.3-0.0
Dutasteride 0.1 mg3.13.9
Dutasteride 0.5 mg4.75.8
Finasteride 1 mg3.24.0
Placebo-0.7-0.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Terminal Hair Count (THC) Within a 2.54 cm (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MT

The THC (thick, long, and dark hair) was the sum of all nonvellus hairs (>=60 μm in width; thick and noticeable hair) within a target 2.54 cm (1 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at BL so that the same area could be identified at BL and post-BL. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure visibility for subsequent photographs. For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph; HC was based on the hair follicles in the photographs. Change from BL=Week 12/Week 24 value minus BL value. (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

,,,,
InterventionHair count (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12, n=147, 144, 151, 145, 131Week 24, n=148, 155, 158, 150, 141
Dutasteride 0.02 mg-13.4-15.7
Dutasteride 0.1 mg18.329.4
Dutasteride 0.5 mg29.346
Finasteride 1 mg24.236.3
Placebo-11.5-17.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Terminal Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MT

The THC (thick, long, and dark hair) was the sum of all nonvellus hairs (>=60 μm in width; thick and noticeable hair) within a target 1.13 cm (0.44 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at BL so that the same area could be identified at BL and post-BL. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure visibility for subsequent photographs. For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph; HC was based on hair follicles in the photographs. Change from BL=Week 12/Week 24 value minus BL value. (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

,,,,
InterventionHair count (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12, n=152, 154, 155, 149, 134Week 24, n=152, 158, 159, 152, 142
Dutasteride 0.02 mg-2.7-2.8
Dutasteride 0.1 mg4.06.0
Dutasteride 0.5 mg5.99.3
Finasteride 1 mg4.57.2
Placebo-1.1-3.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Hair Growth Satisfaction Scale (HGSS) Scores at Weeks 12 and 24

Participant satisfaction with hair appearance/growth was assessed by 5 questions (each scored on a 7-point scale: How satisfied do you feel about: [1] The overall appearance of your hair; [2] The appearance of the thinning area[s] [TAs] on your head; [3] The amount of scalp that can be seen in the TAs; [4] The amount of hair in the TAs; [5] The growth of hair in the TAs): -3, Very dissatisfied (DS); -2, DS; -1, Somewhat DS; 0, Neutral (neither satisfied nor DS); 1, Somewhat satisfied (SA); 2, SA; 3, Very SA. The scores for the 5 questions were summed to obtain the HGSS total score (-15 to 15). (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12, n=171, 174, 173, 170, 160Week 24, n=172, 176, 177, 170, 165
Dutasteride 0.02 mg7.98.3
Dutasteride 0.1 mg9.811.5
Dutasteride 0.5 mg8.412.5
Finasteride 1 mg8.510.8
Placebo8.59.3

[back to top]

Global Assessment of Improvement From Baseline to Week 24 Assessed for Vertex and Frontal Views Separately

A central panel of 3 dermatologists independently assessed change in hair growth from Baseline to Week 24 using a 7-point scale: greatly decreased (-3), moderately decreased (-2), slightly decreased (-1), no change (0), slightly increased (1), moderately increased (2), and greatly increased (3). The median score, across the 3 panel members, is summarized. This assessment was performed by comparing the global photographs obtained at Baseline with those subsequently obtained at Week 24. This assessment was made separately based on the global photography of the vertex and frontal views. (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Vertex view, n=172, 174, 176, 167, 164Frontal/Superior view, n=171, 174, 176, 167, 165
Dutasteride 0.02 mg-0.09-0.10
Dutasteride 0.1 mg0.420.36
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.630.58
Finasteride 1 mg0.490.34
Placebo-0.15-0.14

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline (BL) in the Stage (S) of Androgenic Alopecia (AGA) According to the Norwood-Hamilton Scale at Week 12 (W12)

"The investigator/designee assessed the stage (Stage I to Stage VII) of AGA (i.e., male pattern baldness [MPB]) by utilizing the Norwood-Hamilton scale, used to measure the progression of MPB. Stage VII indicates worse balding than stage I. Assessment was made by direct visual examination (aided by pictures) of the participant at Baseline and Week 12 (W12). v, vertex; most of the hair loss (commonly seen with advancing age) is on the vertex. a, type a variant; major features are (1) the entire anterior hairline border recedes in unison; (2) there is no simultaneous balding of the vertex." (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BL S IIIv to W12 S II, n=79, 70, 69, 72, 73BL S IIIv to W12 S IIa, n=79, 70, 69, 72, 73BL S IIIv to W12 S III, n=79, 70, 69, 72, 73BL S IIIv to W12 S IIIa, n=79, 70, 69, 72, 73BL S IIIv to W12 S IIIv, n=79, 70, 69, 72, 73BL S IIIv to W12 S IV, n=79, 70, 69, 72, 73BL S IIIv to W12 S IVa, n=79, 70, 69, 72, 73BL S IIIv to W12 S V, n=79, 70, 69, 72, 73BL S IIIv to W12 S Va, n=79, 70, 69, 72, 73BL S IIIv to W12 S VI, n=79, 70, 69, 72, 73BL S IV to W12 S II, n=52, 59, 58, 56, 53BL S IV to W12 S IIa, n=52, 59, 58, 56, 53BL S IV to W12 S III, n=52, 59, 58, 56, 53BL S IV to W12 S IIIa, n=52, 59, 58, 56, 53BL S IV to W12 S IIIv, n=52, 59, 58, 56, 53BL S IV to W12 S IV, n=52, 59, 58, 56, 53BL S IV to W12 S IVa, n=52, 59, 58, 56, 53BL S IV to W12 S V, n=52, 59, 58, 56, 53BL S IV to W12 S Va, n=52, 59, 58, 56, 53BL S IV to W12 S VI, n=52, 59, 58, 56, 53BL S V to W12 S II, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W12 S IIa, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W12 S III, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W12 S IIIa, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W12 S IIIv, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W12 S IV, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W12 S IVa, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W12 S V, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W12 S Va, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W12 S VI, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35
Dutasteride 0.02 mg108059101000040350020000101404000
Dutasteride 0.1 mg0011155200000010844140000003503800
Dutasteride 0.5 mg1010059200000040547000000101503301
Finasteride 1 mg0011062000000010545020000000203300
Placebo104071201000020245120000200403500

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline (BL) in the Stage (S) of Androgenic Alopecia (AGA) According to the Norwood-Hamilton Scale at Week 24

"The investigator/designee assessed the stage (Stage I to Stage VII) of AGA (i.e., male pattern baldness [MPB]) by utilizing the Norwood-Hamilton scale, used to measure the progression of MPB. Stage VII indicates worse balding than stage I. Assessment was made by direct visual examination (aided by pictures) of the participant at Baseline and Week 24 (W24). v, vertex; most of the hair loss (commonly seen with advancing age) is on the vertex. a, type a variant; major features are (1) the entire anterior hairline border recedes in unison; (2) there is no simultaneous balding of the vertex." (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BL S IIIv to W24 S II, n=80, 72, 72, 72, 76BL S IIIv to W24 S IIa, n=80, 72, 72, 72, 76BL S IIIv to W24 S III, n=80, 72, 72, 72, 76BL S IIIv to W24 S IIIa, n=80, 72, 72, 72, 76BL S IIIv to W24 S IIIv, n=80, 72, 72, 72, 76BL S IIIv to W24 S IV, n=80, 72, 72, 72, 76BL S IIIv to W24 S IVa, n=80, 72, 72, 72, 76BL S IIIv to W24 S V, n=80, 72, 72, 72, 76BL S IIIv to W24 S Va, n=80, 72, 72, 72, 76BL S IIIv to W24 S VI, n=80, 72, 72, 72, 76BL S IV to W24 S II, n=52, 59, 59, 56, 54BL S IV to W24 S IIa, n=52, 59, 59, 56, 54BL S IV to W24 S III, n=52, 59, 59, 56, 54BL S IV to W24 S IIIa, n=52, 59, 59, 56, 54BL S IV to W24 S IIIv, n=52, 59, 59, 56, 54BL S IV to W24 S IV, n=52, 59, 59, 56, 54BL S IV to W24 S IVa, n=52, 59, 59, 56, 54BL S IV to W24 S V, n=52, 59, 59, 56, 54BL S IV to W24 S Va, n=52, 59, 59, 56, 54BL S IV to W24 S VI, n=52, 59, 59, 56, 54BL S V to W24 S II, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W12 S IIa, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W24 S III, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W24 S IIIa, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W24 S IIIv, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W24 S IV, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W24 S IVa, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W24 S V, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W24 S Va, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35BL S V to W24 S VI, n=41, 46, 46, 41, 35
Dutasteride 0.02 mg2080611000010307460200101011003300
Dutasteride 0.1 mg20110581000010401139040000104803300
Dutasteride 0.5 mg311305410000105210371000003031002500
Finasteride 1 mg21130591000000401336010000101812400
Placebo306067400000020444020000203702900

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of Dutasteride at Week 12, Week 24, and Follow-up (Week 26)

Serum concentrations of dutasteride were measured after 12 weeks and 24 weeks of study treatment and at follow-up (approximately 2 weeks after the last dose of study treatment). (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Week 12, Week 24, and Week 26

,,
Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Week 12, n=172, 172, 165Week 24, n=158, 158, 153Week 26, n=156, 154, 152
Dutasteride 0.02 mg0.20.00.1
Dutasteride 0.1 mg2.12.00.3
Dutasteride 0.5 mg33.236.121.1

[back to top]

Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Week 12, Week 24, and Follow-up (Week 26)

Serum concentrations of DHT were measured after 12 weeks and 24 weeks of study treatment and at follow-up (approximately 2 weeks after the last dose of study treatment). (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Week 12, Week 24, and Week 26

,,,,
Interventionnanomoles per liter (nmol/L) (Mean)
Week 12, n=172, 174, 172, 170, 161Week 24, n=173, 177, 176, 170, 165Week 26, n=173, 177, 177, 171, 165
Dutasteride 0.02 mg0.881.011.11
Dutasteride 0.1 mg0.390.490.77
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.310.310.37
Finasteride 1 mg0.450.491.03
Placebo1.171.161.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (BL) in Target Area Hair Count (HC) Within a 2.54 Centimeter (cm) (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (MT)

The primary target area HC was based on the nonvellus hair (>=30 micrometers [μm] in width; thick and noticeable hair) count within a target 2.54 cm (1 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at BL so that the same area could be identified at BL and post-BL. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure visibility for subsequent photographs. For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph; HC was based on hair follicles in the photographs. Change from BL=Week 24 value minus the BL value. (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionHair count (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.9
Dutasteride 0.02 mg17.1
Dutasteride 0.1 mg63.0
Dutasteride 0.5 mg89.6
Finasteride 1 mg56.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by MT

The primary target area HC was based on the nonvellus hair (>=30 micrometers [μm] in width; thick and noticeable hair) count within a target 1.13 cm (0.44 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at BL so that the same area could be identified at BL and post-BL. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure visibility for subsequent photographs. For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph; HC was based on hair follicles in the photographs. Change from BL=Week 24 value minus the BL value. (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionHair count (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.3
Dutasteride 0.02 mg4.2
Dutasteride 0.1 mg12.4
Dutasteride 0.5 mg18.1
Finasteride 1 mg12.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex, as Assessed by MT at Week 12

The primary target area HC was based on the nonvellus hair (>=30 micrometers [μm] in width; thick and noticeable hair) count within a target 1.13 cm (0.44 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at BL so that the same area could be identified at BL and post-BL. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure visibility for subsequent photographs. For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph; HC was based on hair follicles in the photographs. Change from BL=Week 12 value minus the BL value. (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionHair count (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.4
Dutasteride 0.02 mg5.1
Dutasteride 0.1 mg12.8
Dutasteride 0.5 mg17.1
Finasteride 1 mg10.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 2.54 cm (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 as Assessed by MT

The primary target area HC was based on the nonvellus hair (>=30 micrometers [μm] in width; thick and noticeable hair) count within a target 2.54 cm (1 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at BL so that the same area could be identified at BL and post-BL. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure visibility for subsequent photographs. For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph; HC was based on hair follicles in the photographs. Change from BL=Week 12 value minus the BL value. (NCT01231607)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionHair count (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.0
Dutasteride 0.02 mg22.9
Dutasteride 0.1 mg59.6
Dutasteride 0.5 mg82.3
Finasteride 1 mg50.9

[back to top]

Change Number of Standard Drinks Per Week.

Change in Average Standard Drinks (14 gr ethanol) per week: last 2 weeks of treatment (wk 7-8) minus baseline average drinking average from baseline 90 day drinking history (NCT01262287)
Timeframe: Baseline (average weekly drinking for 90 day period prior to screening) vs. End Point (average weekly drinking weeks 7 and 8 of treatment)

Interventionstandard drinks per week (Mean)
Dutasteride-26.2
Placebo-25.5

[back to top]

Change in Standard Drinks Per Week - Moderation by Genetic Variation

Moderation of primary outcome measure [change in standard drinks per week from baseline to end point (average weeks 7 and 8 of treatment)] by genetic variation rs12529 in neuroactive steroid biosynthetic enzyme gene AKR1C (AKR1C3*2 C-allele associated with alcohol use disorder) (NCT01262287)
Timeframe: Baseline (average weekly drinking for 90 day period prior to screening) vs. End Point (average weekly drinking weeks 7 and 8 of treatment)

Interventionstandard drinks per week (Mean)
AKR1C3*2 C/C Genotype + Dutasteride-32.4
AKR1C3*2 C/C Genotype + Placebo-31.2
AKR1C3*2 G-carriers + Dutasteride21.8
AKR1C3*2 G-carriers + Placebo-22.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 2 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach

"The PPST questionnaire consists of two questions (asked to determine how satisfied participants are with the treatment received) and was administered at Baseline and all post-Baseline visits. Question 2 was: Would you ask your doctor for the treatment you received in this study? There were three possible responses, including: Yes, No, and Not sure. Response categories included Yes and No or Not Sure, created by grouping together No and Not sure. The LOCF method involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study." (NCT01294592)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline, Yes, n=315, 328Baseline, No or Not Sure, n=315, 328Month 1, Yes, n=358, 347Month 1, No or Not Sure, n=358, 347Month 3, Yes, n=359, 357Month 3, No or Not Sure, n=359, 357Month 6, Yes, n=359, 360Month 6, No or Not Sure, n=359, 360Month 9, Yes, n=359, 361Month 9, No or Not Sure, n=359, 361Month 12, Yes, n=359, 363Month 12, No or Not Sure, n=359, 363Month 15, Yes, n=359, 364Month 15, No or Not Sure, n=359, 364Month 18, Yes, n=359, 364Month 18, No or Not Sure, n=359, 364Month 21, Yes, n=359, 364Month 21, No or Not Sure, n=359, 364Month 24, Yes, n=359, 364Month 24, No or Not Sure, n=359, 364
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin109206224134232127232127238121240119246113235124249110243116
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No103225166181207150227133231130229134239125236128234130236128

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Indicated Improvement Categories in the IPSS at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach

Symptom improvement was assessed using IPSS categorical changes from Baseline. Change from Baseline categories were summarized by treatment group using five improvement levels: >=1 point through >=5 points. IPSS percent change from Baseline was summarized using seven improvement levels: >0 percent, >=10 percent, >=20 percent, >=25 percent, >=30 percent, >=40 percent, and >=50 percent. Change in IPSS from Baseline was analysed using the LOCF method and is summarized for the following categories: >=2 points, >=3 points, and percent change >=25. The 7 items in the IPSS questionnaire quantitatively measure the level of urinary symptoms reported as a total IPSS. The total IPSS (sum of the first 7 items) can range from 0 to 35: mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19), or severe (20 to 35). (NCT01294592)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Month 1, >=2 points, n=358, 367Month 1, >=3 points, n=358, 367Month 1, >=25 percent, n=358, 367Month 3, >=2 points, n=359, 368Month 3, >=3 points, n=359, 368Month 3, >=25 percent, n= 359, 368Month 6, >=2 points, n=359, 368Month 6, >=3 points, n=359, 368Month 6, >=25 percent, n=359, 368Month 9, >=2 points, n=359, 368Month 9, >=3 points, n=359, 368Month 9, >=25 percent, n=359, 368Month 12, >=2 points, n=359, 368Month 12, >=3 points, n=359, 368Month 12, >=25 percent, n= 359, 368Month 15, >=2 points, n=359, 368Month 15, >=3 points, n=359, 368Month 15, >=25 percent, n=359, 368Month 18, >=2 points, n=359, 368Month 18, >=3 points, n=359, 368Month 18, >=25 percent, 359, 368Month 21, >=2 points, n=359, 368Month 21, >=3 points, n=359, 368Month 21, >=25 percent, n= 359, 368Month 24, >=2 points, n=359, 368Month 24, >=3points, n=359, 368Month 24, >=25 percent, n= 359, 368
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin225182161277233218277245229286257247291261249289259245288262245292267253295277261
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No1499076221172150250208189276222207273229214275243231268229212274237224279234221

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Starting Post-randomization

A post-randomization adverse event is defined as an event with an onset on or after the randomization date or with a missing onset date. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment was exercised in deciding whether reporting was appropriate in other situations. Refer to the general non-serious AE/SAE module for a list of non-serious AEs (occurring at a frequency threshold of >=5%) and SAEs. (NCT01294592)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAny SAE
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin19038
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No11925
Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes9519

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Events of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH

The number of participants with the first occurrence of clinical progression (CP) of BPH occurring on or after the randomization date are summarized by treatment and year. Time is based on the date of the first-occurring CP event, and is relative to the randomization date. CP of BPH is a composite of five endpoints assessed through the end of the study, including: symptom deterioration by IPSS >=3 points from Baseline (Visit 2); acute urinary retention related to BPH; incontinence (overflow or urge) related to BPH; recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or urosepsis related to BPH; renal insufficiency related to BPH (a single >=50% rise from Baseline serum creatinine and a total value >=1.5 milligrams/deciliter). For components that required multiple episodes, the first of the multiple episodes was utilized in terms of timing. (NCT01294592)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

,
InterventionEvents (Number)
Year 1, n=369, 373Year 2, n=276, 251
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin4817
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No9414

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in the BPH Impact Index (BII) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach

The BII is a 4-item questionnaire covering physical discomfort, worry, bother, and impact on usual activities, with a minimum score of 0 (best) and a maximum score (worst) of 13 points. Individual missing questionnaire responses were imputed, as applicable. Change from Baseline in the BII score was summarized by treatment group using the LOCF approach at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline =Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. Baseline is defined as the Visit 2 value if it exists; otherwise, it is the latest of all Screening values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT01294592)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1, n=357, 366Month 3, n=359, 368Month 6, n=359, 368Month 9, n=359, 368Month 12, n=359, 368Month 15, n=359, 368Month 18, n=359, 368Month 21, n=359, 368Month 24, n=359, 368
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-1.3-1.8-1.9-2.1-2.1-2.2-2.2-2.4-2.4
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-0.4-1.0-1.3-1.5-1.5-1.5-1.4-1.6-1.6

[back to top]

Exposure to Study Drug

Study drug exposure (days) = treatment stop date - treatment start date + 1. Participants in the Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes subgroup could have been escalated to study drug at any time during the study. Therefore, it is possible that participants were exposed to tamsulosin for a shorter length of time than participants in the dutasteride plus tamsulosin group. (NCT01294592)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventiondays (Mean)
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin639.8
Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes566.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach

"The IPSS questionnaire is a 7-item self-administered questionnaire designed to quantify the following urinary symptoms: Question 1 (Q1), incomplete emptying; Q2, frequency; Q3, intermittency; Q4, urgency; Q5, weak stream; Q6, straining; Q7, nocturia. It has an additional, independent eighth question to assess change in BPH-related health status (BHS) and quality of life. BHS scores range from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates delighted and 6 indicates terrible. The 7 items in the IPSS questionnaire quantitatively measure the level of urinary symptoms reported as a total IPSS. The total IPSS (sum of the first 7 items) can range from 0 to 35: mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19), or severe (20 to 35). Change from Baseline in IPSS total score was calculated as the Month 24 value minus the Baseline value. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study." (NCT01294592)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1, n=358, 367Month 3, n=359, 368Month 6, n=359, 368Month 9, n=359, 368Month 12, n=359, 368Month 15, n=359, 368Month 18, n=359, 368Month 21, n=359, 368Month 24, n=359, 368
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-3.2-4.5-4.6-5.1-5.2-5.2-5.1-5.5-5.4
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-0.9-2.4-3.2-3.6-3.6-3.6-3.3-3.6-3.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated First-occurring Component of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH

"CP of BPH is a composite of five endpoints assessed through the end of the study, including: symptom progression (symptom deterioration by IPSS >=3 points from Baseline [Visit 2]); acute urinary retention (AUR) related to BPH; incontinence (overflow or urge) related to BPH; recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or urosepsis related to BPH; renal insufficiency related to BPH (a single >=50% rise from Baseline serum creatinine and a total value >=1.5 milligrams/deciliter). The number of participants with CP of BPH, the number of participants with the indicated first-occurring component of CP of BPH, the number of participants with two simultaneously first-occurring components (Tied for first component), and the number of participants with multiple first-occurring components were summarized by treatment group." (NCT01294592)
Timeframe: Up to Month 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Participants with CP of BPH, n=369, 373BPH symptom progression, n=65, 108BPH-related AUR, n=65, 108BPH-related incontinence, n=65, 108Recurrent BPH-related UTI, n=65, 108BPH-related renal insufficiency, n=65, 108Tied for first component, n=65, 108Multiple components (2 components), n=65, 108Multiple components (3 components), n=65, 108Multiple components (>=4 components), n=65, 108
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin655924000400
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No1089743400911

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 1 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach

"The PPST questionnaire consists of two questions (asked to determine how satisfied participants are with the treatment received) and was administered at Baseline and all post-Baseline visits. Question 1 was: Overall, how satisfied are you with the treatment and its effect on your urinary problems? There were seven possible responses, including: very satisfied, satisfied, somewhat satisfied, neutral, somewhat dissatisfied, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied. Response categories were created by grouping together very satisfied, satisfied, and somewhat satisfied responses into the category of Any Satisfaction (AS), and separately grouping neutral, somewhat dissatisfied, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied responses into the category of Neutral or Any Dissatisfaction (N/AD). The LOCF method involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study." (NCT01294592)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline, Any Satisfaction, n=315, 328Baseline, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=315, 328Month 1, Any Satisfaction, n=358, 349Month 1, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=358, 349Month 3, Any Satisfaction, n= 359, 359Month 3, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 359Month 6, Any Satisfaction, n=359, 361Month 6, Neutral /Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 361Month 9, Any Satisfaction, n=359, 361Month 9, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n= 359, 361Month 12, Any Satisfaction, n=359, 363Month 12, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 363Month 15, Any Satisfaction, n=359, 364Month 15, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 364Month 18, Any Satisfaction, n=359, 364Month 18, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 364Month 21, Any Satisfaction, n=359, 364Month 21, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 364Month 24, Any Satisfaction, n=359, 364Month 24, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 364
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin119196272863005930158304553114831148305543104931247
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No1222062091402659428576293683055829965298663006431252

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Serious Adverse Event

"A serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or results in prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. For a list of all serious adverse events occurring during the course of the study, see the table entitled Serious Adverse Events in the Adverse Event section of the results record." (NCT01299571)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Avodart 0.5 mg5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Adverse Event

"An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. For a list of all adverse events occurring during the course of the study, see the table entitled Other (Non-Serious) Adverse Events in the Adverse Event section of the results record." (NCT01299571)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Avodart 0.5 mg146

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Unexpected Adverse Events

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Unexpected adverse events include those not listed in the approved product information and not described as precautions or warnings. (NCT01299571)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
InsomniaMouth DryConstipationAbdominal PainDiarrheaVomitingColonic PolypEpigastric DiscomfortGastroesophageal RefluxHemorrhoidsAstheniaFeverChillsPainSpasmsOrofacial DyskinesiaEmbolism PulmonaryThrombosis CerebralNose CongestionPneumoniaLung CarcinomaSkin EruptionThrombosis Venous Deep
Avodart 0.5 mg23222111111111111111111

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Risk of Acute Urinary Retention and Surgery Based on an MPR Threshold of 75%

Claims-based definition of AUR and surgery based on the presence of an ICD-9-CM code of 599.6x, 788.20, or 788.29 and CPT procedure codes, respectively. For this analysis, we evaluated the association between compliance with 5-ARI therapy (measured by medication possession ratio [MPR]) and risk of AUR and surgery. MPR was calculated as the number of days that 5-ARI therapy was taken divided by the total number of follow-up days. For this analysis, the threshold for compliance was set at MPR = 75%. (NCT01334723)
Timeframe: Up to one year following the first pharmacy claim for 5ARI therapy or medical encounter for AUR or prostate surgery in the 5 and a half year period from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2006

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of Participants with AUR and surgeryNumber of Participants without AUR and surgery
Acute Urinary Retention Outcomes Cohort, MPR <=75%27557658
Acute Urinary Retention Outcomes Cohort, MPR >75%12775603
Prostate Surgery Outcomes Cohort, MPR <=75%62710480
Prostate Surgery Outcomes Cohort, MPR >75%1856447

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Risk of Acute Urinary Retention and Surgery Based on an MPR Threshold of 80%

Claims-based definition of AUR and surgery based on the presence of an ICD-9-CM code of 599.6x, 788.20, or 788.29 and CPT procedure codes, respectively. For this analysis, we evaluated the association between compliance with 5-ARI therapy (measured by medication possession ratio [MPR]) and risk of AUR and surgery. MPR was calculated as the number of days that 5-ARI therapy was taken divided by the total number of follow-up days. For this analysis, the threshold for compliance was set at MPR = 80%. (NCT01334723)
Timeframe: Up to one year following the first pharmacy claim for 5ARI therapy or medical encounter for AUR or prostate surgery in the 5 and a half year period from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2006

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of Participants with AUR and surgeryNumber of Participants without AUR and surgery
Acute Urinary Retention Outcomes Cohort, MPR <=80%28128975
Acute Urinary Retention Outcomes Cohort, MPR >80%9154591
Prostate Surgery Outcomes Cohort, MPR <=80%62711326
Prostate Surgery Outcomes Cohort, MPR >80%1855601

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Mean Length of 5-ARI Therapy

In this analysis, we evaluated the association between 5-ARI length of therapy and risk of acute urinary retention and prostate surgery. (NCT01334723)
Timeframe: Up to one year following the first pharmacy claim for 5ARI therapy or medical encounter for AUR or prostate surgery in the 5 and a half year period from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2006

Interventiondays (Mean)
Acute Urinary Retention Outcomes Cohort276.8
Prostate Surgery Outcomes Cohort289.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Risk of Acute Urinary Retention and Surgery Based on an MPR Threshold of 70%

Claims-based definition of acute urinary retention (AUR) and surgery based on the presence of an ICD-9-CM code of 599.6x, 788.20, or 788.29 and CPT procedure codes, respectively. For this analysis, we evaluated the association between compliance with 5-ARI therapy (measured by medication possession ratio [MPR]) and risk of AUR or surgery. MPR was calculated as the number of days that 5-ARI therapy was taken divided by the total number of follow-up days. For this analysis, the threshold for compliance was set at MPR = 70%. (NCT01334723)
Timeframe: The 5 and a half year period from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2006

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of Participants with AUR and SurgeryNumber of Participants without AUR and Surgery
Acute Urinary Retention Outcomes Cohort, MPR <=70%21405511
Acute Urinary Retention Outcomes Cohort, MPR >70%15878055
Prostate Surgery Outcomes Cohort, MPR <=70%4816905
Prostate Surgery Outocomes Cohort, MPR >70%33110022

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Free From Biochemical Failure

Increase in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measured over time. Freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) was defined from the time of enrollment until PSA failure occurs as defined by the Phoenix definition of a rise to 2 ng/mL above the nadir PSA value. (NCT01342367)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
SOC Cohort81
Oral ADT Group88

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Progression

Participants with clinical progression are defined as those with acute urinary retention and/or receiving prostate-related surgery. (NCT01386983)
Timeframe: 3 months prior to and 12 months following index date

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Early Cohort14
Delayed Cohort5

[back to top]

Best Overall Response

Overall response (OR) rate was defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) based on RECIST 1.0 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. To be assigned a status of CR or PR, changes in tumor measurements must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the response criteria are first met. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions. (NCT01393730)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 12 weeks cycles on treatment. In this study cohort, participants were followed up to 48 months for this endpoint.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone + Prednisone + Dutasteride6

[back to top]

Change in Serum Androgen Levels

Serum androgen levels measured based on established methods. The change from baseline to progression was calculated for each participant. (NCT01393730)
Timeframe: Pairs of patients' samples for androgen analyses were obtained at baseline and at time of progression. In this study cohort, participants were followed up to 48 months for this endpoint.

Interventionng/dl (Median)
Abiraterone + Prednisone + Dutasteride1.2

[back to top]

Change in Serum Levels of Testosterone

Serum testosterone levels were estimated based on established methods. The change from baseline to progression was calculated for each participant. (NCT01393730)
Timeframe: Samples for testosterone analyses were obtained at baseline and at time of progression. In this study cohort, participants were followed up to 48 months for this endpoint.

Interventionng/dL (Median)
Abiraterone + Prednisone + Dutasteride0.25

[back to top] [back to top]

Presence of AR Amplification

Presence of AR amplification was measured by established methods. (NCT01393730)
Timeframe: Patients' samples were evaluated at baseline and every 12 weeks on treatment. In this study cohort, participants were followed up to 48 months for this endpoint.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone + Prednisone + Dutasteride10

[back to top]

Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response

PSA response was defined as decline of 50% from baseline confirmed by a PSA at least 4 weeks later based on Prostate-specific Antigen Working Group-2 (PSAWG-2) (2008) criteria. (NCT01393730)
Timeframe: PSA was measured at baseline and day 1 of every cycle on treatment. In this study cohort, participants were followed up to 48 months for this endpoint.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone + Prednisone + Dutasteride34

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented first observation of progressive disease (PD). Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT01393730)
Timeframe: Disease evaluation occurred every 12 weeks while patients were receiving treatment. In this study cohort, participants were followed up to 48 months for this endpoint.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone + Prednisone + Dutasteride11

[back to top]

Time to PSA Progression

Time to PSA progression based on the Kaplan-Meier method was defined as the time between registration and documented PSA progression. PSA progression based on Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group-2 (PSAWG-2) (2008) criteria was an increase of >/=25% and >/= 2 ng/ml after 12 weeks for patients without a PSA decline from baseline and an increase of >/=25% and >/= 2 ng/ml above the nadir, confirmed by a 2nd value 3 weeks or later for patients with a PSA decline from baseline. PSA progression was reported not duration of response. (NCT01393730)
Timeframe: PSA was measured at baseline and day 1 of every cycle on treatment. In this study cohort, participants were followed up to 48 months for this endpoint.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone + Prednisone + Dutasteride5

[back to top]

Serum Testosterone: Baseline

(NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride4.10
Enzalutamide3.69

[back to top]

Serum Testosterone: Day 180

(NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.12
Enzalutamide9.76

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir

To determine the effects on PSA as measured by the time to the lowest post baseline PSA value prior to prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was a protein produced by normal, as well as malignant, cells of the prostate gland. The PSA nadir was the participant's lowest observed post baseline PSA value. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 195

Interventiondays (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride5.09
Enzalutamide6.01

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Pharmacodynamic Effects: Assessment of Androgen Receptor Signaling as Measured by Intensity of Androgen Receptor Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining

To determine the effects of triplet therapy and enzalutamide alone on androgen receptor signaling in prostatectomy specimens. Androgen receptor (AR) was a type of nuclear receptor that was activated by binding either of the androgenic hormones, testosterone, or dihydrotestosterone in the cytoplasm and then translocating into the nucleus. Androgen receptor (AR) signaling represented the major therapeutic target for treating metastatic prostate cancer. Assessment of androgen receptor signaling was measured by intensity of androgen receptor IHC staining and were graded as 0 (absent), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate) and 3 (strong). Percentage of participants within each grade are reported below. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
0123
Enzalutamide0.00.05.394.7
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.05.627.866.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Positive Surgical Margins

To determine the percentage of participants with positive surgical margins at prostatectomy as assessed by the local and central pathologist. Surgical margin, also known as tumor free margin referred to the visible normal tissue or skin margin that was removed with the surgical excision of a tumor, growth, or malignancy. The margin was described as positive when the pathologist finds cancer cells at the edge of the tissue, suggesting that all of the cancer has not been removed. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Local pathologistCentral pathologist
Enzalutamide12.016.0
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride4.321.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Positive Seminal Vesicles

To determine the percentage of participants with positive seminal vesicles at prostatectomy as assessed by the local and central pathologist. Seminal vesicles or seminal glands, were defined as a pair of simple tubular glands located within the pelvis. They secrete fluid that partly composes the semen. Seminal vesicles with cancer cells in them were called positive seminal vesicles. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Local pathologistCentral pathologist
Enzalutamide36.036.0
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride30.430.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Positive Lymph Nodes

To determine the percentage of participants with positive lymph nodes at prostatectomy as assessed by the local and central pathologist. Lymph nodes were small clumps of immune cells that act as filters for the lymphatic system. Lymph nodes with cancer cells in them were called positive lymph nodes. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Local pathologistCentral pathologist
Enzalutamide4.04.0
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride26.126.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Pathologic Complete Response Rate

Pathologic complete response rate was defined as percentage of participants with pathologic complete response. Pathologic complete response rate following triplet therapy (enzalutamide in combination with leuprolide and dutasteride) and enzalutamide alone when administered as neoadjuvant therapy for 180 days prior to prostatectomy in participants with localized prostate cancer. Pathologic complete response was defined as the absence of morphologically identifiable carcinoma in the prostatectomy specimen, as assessed by the local and central pathologist. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Local pathologistCentral pathologist
Enzalutamide0.00.0
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride8.74.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) That Led to Dose Interruption, Dose Reduction, and Study Drug Discontinuation

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 210 days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Permanent Discontinuation of EnzalutamideTemporary Interruption of EnzalutamideDose Reduction of EnzalutamideStudy Drug Discontinuation
Enzalutamide0000
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0300

[back to top]

Pharmacodynamic Effects: Tissue Dihydrotestosterone (DHT)

To determine pharmacodynamic effects as measured by the amount of tissue DHT in prostatectomy specimens following radical prostatectomy. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionpicogram per milligram (Mean)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.04
Enzalutamide3.34

[back to top]

Pharmacodynamic Effects: Assessment of Mitotic Index

Assessment was performed to determine the effects of triplet therapy and enzalutamide alone on mitotic index. Mitotic index was defined as the ratio between the numbers of cells in a population undergoing mitosis to the number of cells in a population not undergoing mitosis in prostatectomy specimens. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionratio (Mean)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.9
Enzalutamide2.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Extracapsular Extension: Local Review

To determine the percentage of participants with extracapsular extension at prostatectomy as assessed by the local pathologist. Extracapsular extension was defined as prostate cancer cells when extended into the prostate capsule or outer lining of the prostate gland. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride26.1
Enzalutamide36.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Extracapsular Extension: Central Review

To determine the percentage of participants with extracapsular extension at prostatectomy as assessed by the central pathologist. Extracapsular extension was defined as prostate cancer cells when extended into the prostate capsule or outer lining of the prostate gland. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride56.5
Enzalutamide70.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone at Day 180

To determine serum hormone effects as measured by change in testosterone at baseline and at completion of therapy. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride-4.00
Enzalutamide5.74

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Day 180

To determine serum hormone effects as measured by change in DHT values from baseline to the completion of therapy. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride-0.33
Enzalutamide0.25

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Reduction in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)

To determine the effects on PSA as measured by the percentage of participants with PSA less than (<) 0.2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL), and a 50 percent (%) and 90% decrease in PSA value prior to prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was a protein produced by normal, as well as malignant, cells of the prostate gland. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 195

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PSA < 0.2 ng/mL50% decrease in PSA90% decrease in PSA
Enzalutamide29.6100.063.0
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride92.0100.0100.0

[back to top]

Pharmacodynamic Effects: Tissue Testosterone

To determine pharmacodynamic effects as measured by the amount of tissue testosterone in prostatectomy specimens following radical prostatectomy. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionpicogram per milligram (Mean)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.18
Enzalutamide0.90

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir

To determine the effects on PSA as measured by the lowest post baseline PSA value prior to prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was a protein produced by normal, as well as malignant, cells of the prostate gland. The PSA nadir was the participant's lowest observed post baseline PSA value. (NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 195

Interventionmicrogram per liter (mcg/L) (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.04
Enzalutamide0.51

[back to top]

Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT): Baseline

(NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.34
Enzalutamide0.29

[back to top]

Serum Dihydrotestosterone (DHT): Day 180

(NCT01547299)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride0.01
Enzalutamide0.51

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Maximum Rate of Urinary Flow (Qmax) at the Indicated Time Points

The Qmax is used as an indicator for the diagnosis of enlarged prostate. A lower Qmax may indicate that the enlarged prostate. Qmax was assessed at Baseline (screening), Month 3 and Month 6. Change from Baseline was calculated as Qmax score at specified timepoint minus the Baseline Qmax score. (NCT01673490)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6

InterventionMililiter/seconds (Mean)
Month 3, n=54Month 6, n=52
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg2.772.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Month 6

The IPSS is a screening tool used to assess the symptoms of prostate related disease. The IPSS questionnaire consists of seven symptoms questions including feeling of incomplete bladder emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining and nocturia, each referring to during the last month, and each involving assignment of a score from 0 to 5 (no symptoms to almost always symptoms) for a total of maximum 35 points. IPSS total is the sum of the scores of seven questions; therefore, the possible total score ranges from 0 to 35 (0-7: Mildly symptomatic; 8-19: Moderately symptomatic; 20-35: Severely symptomatic). IPSS was assessed at Baseline and Month 6. Change from Baseline was calculated as Month 6 IPSS score- minus Baseline IPSS score. (NCT01673490)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-8.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematology Values Shift From Normal at Baseline to Abnormal at Any Time Post-Baseline

Blood samples were collected at Screening, Month 3 (Visit 3) and Month 6 (Visit 5) for hematology laboratory assessments. Hematology parameters included basophils, leukocytes, hemoglobin (HGB), eosinophils, erythrocytes (ery), ery mean Corpuscular HGB concentration, ery mean corpuscular HGB, ery distribution width, lymphocytes, hematocrit, monocytes, neutrophils and platelets. The number of participants with a shift from normal at Baseline to abnormal at any time post-Baseline for hematology parameters are summarized. (NCT01673490)
Timeframe: Screening, Month 3 and Month 6

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Basophils/Leukocytes, n=54Eosinophils/Leukocytes, n=46Ery Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration, n=44Ery Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin, n=36Ery Mean Corpuscular Volume, n=42Erythrocytes, n=49Erythrocytes Distribution Width, n=4Hematocrit, n=48Hemoglobin, n=49Leukocytes, n=47Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, n=53Monocytes/Leukocytes, n=52Neutrophils/Leukocytes, n=41Platelets, n=53
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg052264337271151

[back to top]

Free to Total PSA Ratio at the Indicated Time Points

Serum sample was collected at Screening (Baseline for participants with Free to Total PSA ratio at Month 6), and Month 6 for assessment of free to total PSA ratio. PSA is a substance produced by prostate gland, and the elevated level of PSA indicates prostate cancer or any other non-cancerous condition related to prostate. Free to total PSA ratio at Baseline for participants with free to total PSA Ratio at Month 6 and free to total PSA ratio at month 6 are presented. (NCT01673490)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Baseline, n=50Month 6, n=52
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg28.20724.887

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Prostate -Specific Antigen (PSA) at the Indicated Time Points

Serum sample was collected at Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6 for assesment of total PSA. PSA is a substance produced by prostate gland, and the elevated level of PSA indicates prostate cancer or any other non-cancerous condition related to prostate. Change from Baseline in total PSA at Month 3 and Month 6 was calculated as value at specified visist minus Baseline value. (NCT01673490)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6

InterventionMicrogram per liter (ug/L) (Mean)
Month 3, n=54Month 6, n=52
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-1.499-1.824

[back to top]

Number Participants With a Negative or Positive Response at the Indicated Time Points

Urine samples were collected at Screening (SC), Month 3 (3M) and Month 6 (6M) for urinalysis laboratory assesment. Final value (FV) is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the study for each parameter.Urinalysis parameters included erythrocytes, glucose, ketones, leukocytes and protein. Number of participants with a negative (NEG) or positive (POS) response at the indicated time points are summarized. (NCT01673490)
Timeframe: Screening, Month 3 and Month 6

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Erythrocytes, SC, POS, n=59Erythrocytes, SC, NEG, n=59Erythrocytes, 3M, POS, n=54Erythrocytes, 3M, NEG, n=54Erythrocytes, 6M, POS, n=52Erythrocytes, 6M, NEG, n=52Erythrocytes, FV, POS, n=54Erythrocytes, FV, NEG, n=54Glucose, SC, POS, n=59Glucose, SC, NEG, n=59Glucose, 3M, POS, n=54Glucose, 3M, NEG, n=54Glucose, 6M, POS, n=52Glucose, 6M, NEG, n=52Glucose, FV, POS, n=54Glucose, FV, NEG, n=54Ketones, SC, POS, n=59Ketones, SC, NEG, n=59Ketones, 3M, POS, n=54Ketones, 3M, NEG, n=54Ketones, 6M, POS, n=52Ketones, 6M, NEG, n=52Ketones, FV, POS, n=54Ketones, FV, NEG, n=54Leukocytes, SC, POS, n=59Leukocytes, SC, NEG, n=59Leukocytes, 3M, POS, n=54Leukocytes, 3M, NEG, n=54Leukocytes, 6M, POS, n=52Leukocytes, 6M, NEG, n=52Leukocytes, FV, POS, n=54Leukocytes, FV, NEG, n=54Protein, SC, POS, n=59Protein, SC, NEG, n=59Protein, 3M, POS, n=54Protein, 3M, NEG, n=54Protein, 6M, POS, n=52Protein, 6M, NEG, N=52Protein, FV, POS, n=54Protein, FV, NEG, n=54
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg455648646747356153052054059252151153356054646648950648745846

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Values Shift From Normal at Baseline to Abnormal at Any Time Post-Baseline

Blood samples were collected at Screening, Month 1 (Visit 1), Month 3 (Visit 3) and Month 6 (Visit 5) for chemistry laboratory assessments. Clinical chemistry parameters included alanine aminotrasferase (ALT), aspartate aminotrasferase (AST), creatinine, glucose, potassium, protein, sodium and urea. The number of participants with a shift from normal at Baseline to abnormal at any time post-Baseline for a clinical chemistry parameter are summarized. (NCT01673490)
Timeframe: Screening, Month 1, Month 3 and Month 6

InterventionParticipants (Number)
ALT, n=48AST, n=49Creatinine, n=51Glucose, n=47Potassium, n=52Protein, n=56Sodium, n=53Urea, n=54
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg96981407

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Post-treatment Adverse Events (AEs) or Any Serious Adverse Event (SAEs) and Treatment-related AEs

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product at any dose, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is an important medical event that jeopardizes the participants or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the above definition, and is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. (NCT01673490)
Timeframe: From start of study medication until follow-up (up to 7 months)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAny SAEAny treatment-related AE
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg211

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at the Indicated Time Points

A 12 lead ECG was measured at Screening, Month 1 (Visit 1), Month 3 (Visit 3) and Month 6 (Visit 5). (NCT01673490)
Timeframe: Screening, Month 1, Month 3 and Month 6

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Screening, n=59Month 1, n=56Month 3, n=53Month 6, n=52
Dutasteride 0.5 mg Plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg49475044

[back to top]

Carbohydrate-deficient Transferrin

Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) at end of treatment as percentage of baseline. Serum CDT is a biochemical measure of heavy alcohol use. (NCT01758523)
Timeframe: end of 12-week treatment vs. baseline

Interventionpercentage of baseline CDT (Mean)
Dutasteride94
Sugar Pill107

[back to top]

Drinks Per Week

Total number of drinks aggregated by week (NCT01758523)
Timeframe: 12-week treatment period

Interventiondrinks/week (Mean)
Dutasteride22.0
Sugar Pill27.2

[back to top]

HDD/ Week by Treatment Group and AKR1C3*2 Genotype

Change in Number of days / week with 5 or more drinks consumed contrasting AKR1C3*2 CC vs. G-carrier genotype and treatment group (NCT01758523)
Timeframe: 12-week treatment period

Interventionheavy drinking days/week (Mean)
Dutasteride - AKR1C3*2 CC1.06
Sugar Pill - AKR1C3*2 CC2.9
Dutasteride - AKR1C3*2 G-carrier2.05
Sugar Pill - AKR1C3*2 G-carrier2.5

[back to top]

Heavy Drinking Days Per Week

Number of days / study week with 5 or more drinks consumed (NCT01758523)
Timeframe: 12-week treatment period

Interventionheavy drinking days/week (Mean)
Dutasteride1.75
Sugar Pill2.67

[back to top]

Number of Participants With no Hazardous Drinking

Number of participants with no hazardous drinking (not more than 4 drinks on one day and not more than 14 drinks per week) during the last 4 weeks of treatment. (NCT01758523)
Timeframe: Last 4 weeks of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dutasteride13
Sugar Pill3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With no Heavy Drinking Days

Number of participants with no heavy drinking days (days with 5 or more drinks) during the last 4 weeks of treatment. (NCT01758523)
Timeframe: Last 4 weeks of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dutasteride16
Sugar Pill8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total MSHQ Scores From Baseline at 12 Months Among Participants With IPSS Improvement of >=25 Percent

Participants with change from baseline in total MSHQ scores with good BPH symptomatic response (measured by improvement in IPSS)were analysed.Change from BL at the scheduled post-baseline time points were analyzed using MMRM analysis method with an Observed Cases approach. Values are expressed as adjusted mean along with standard error. The MMRM analysis included fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit and treatment by visit interaction and the continuous fixed covariates of BL total score and BL score by visit interaction. BL is defined as earliest DB treatment start date if the par. took at least one dose of DB study drug; change from BL was calculated as Month 12 value(s) minus BL value(s). Only those par with non-missing change from baseline data were analysed (presented as n=X,X in the category titles) (NCT01777269)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.6
Duodart-8.3

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline (BL) in Total Score From the Full Men's Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) at 12 Months

Total MSHQ score is composed of 3 domain scores: Erection score(ES)=sum of score for Questions (Q) 1 to 3(ranges from 0 to 15), Ejaculation score(EjS)=sum of scores for Q5 to 11(ranges from 1 to 35), Satisfaction score(SS)=sum of scores for Q13 to 18(ranges from 6 to 30). Total MSHQ score=ES+EjS+SS. The total MSHQ score ranges from 7-80, with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. Change from BL at scheduled post-BL time points were analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis method with an Observed Cases approach. Values are expressed as adjusted mean along with standard error. The MMRM analysis included fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit and treatment by visit interaction and the continuous fixed covariates of BL total score and BL score by visit interaction. BL is defined as earliest double-blind (DB) treatment start date if the par. took at least one dose of DB study drug; change from BL was calculated as Month 12 value(s) minus BL value(s) (NCT01777269)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.7
Duodart-8.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Ejaculatory Dysfunction (EjD) at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months

Ejaculation scale is a domain of MSHQ to assess ejaculatory dysfunction. EjS is the sum of score for questions 5 to 11. The score ranges from 1 (could not ejaculate) to 35 (strong ejaculation). Change from BL at the scheduled post-baseline time points were analyzed using MMRM analysis method with an Observed Cases approach. Values are expressed as adjusted mean along with standard error. The MMRM analysis included fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit and treatment by visit interaction and the continuous fixed covariates of BL total score and BL score by visit interaction. BL is defined as earliest DB treatment start date if the par. took at least one dose of DB study drug; change from BL was calculated as Month 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 values minus BL value(s). Only those par with non-missing change from baseline data were analysed (presented as n=X,X in the category titles) (NCT01777269)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1, n=210, 208Month 3, n= 197, 196Month 6, n= 191, 179Month 9, n=177, 161Month 12, n= 173, 164
Duodart-3.2-5.8-7.5-7.6-7.5
Placebo-0.3-0.5-0.7-0.5-0.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reaching Various Thresholds of Change in Total MSHQ From Baseline at 12 Months

"Participants reaching thresholds of change in total MSHQ were assessed. Threshold values are defined as multiplicative factor. Threshold included +10 points, +20 points, +25 points, -10 points, -20 points, -25 points; where + indicates improvement and -indicates worsening. Treatment comparisons were done based on categories defined by these thresholds using Mantel-Haenszel test" (NCT01777269)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
>= 25>= 20>= 10<= -25<= -20<= -10
Duodart138132061
Placebo03163324

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total MSHQ Scores From Baseline at 12 Months Among Participants With IPSS Improvement of >=2 Points and >=3 Points

Total MSHQ score is composed of 3 domain scores: ES+EjS+SS and the score ranges from 7-80, with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. Par. with change from baseline in total MSHQ scores with good BPH symptomatic response (measured by improvement in IPSS)were analysed. Change from BL at the scheduled post-baseline time points were analyzed using MMRM analysis method with an Observed Cases approach. Values are expressed as adjusted mean along with standard error. The MMRM analysis included fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit and treatment by visit interaction and the continuous fixed covariates of BL total score and BL score by visit interaction. BL is defined as earliest DB treatment start date if the par. took at least one dose of DB study drug; change from BL was calculated as Month 12 value(s) minus BL value(s). Only those par with non-missing change from baseline data were analysed (presented as n=X,X in the category titles) (NCT01777269)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
IPSS improvement of >=2, n=152, 142IPSS improvement of >=3, n=138,136
Duodart-8.4-8.0
Placebo-0.6-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Satisfaction Score at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months

Satisfaction scale is a domain of MSHQ to assess sexual relationship. SS is the sum of score for questions 13 to 18. The score ranges from 6 (extremely dissatisfied) to 30 (extremely satisfied). Change from BL at the scheduled post-baseline time points were analyzed using MMRM analysis method with an Observed Cases approach. Values are expressed as adjusted mean along with standard error. The MMRM analysis included fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit and treatment by visit interaction and the continuous fixed covariates of BL total score and BL score by visit interaction. BL is defined as earliest DB treatment start date if the par. took at least one dose of DB study drug; change from BL was calculated as Month 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 values minus BL value(s). Only those par with non-missing change from baseline data were analysed (presented as n=X,X in the category titles) (NCT01777269)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Month 1, n=200, 197Month 3, n= 189, 182Month 6, n= 185, 168Month 9, n=173, 153Month 12, n= 169, 152
Duodart-0.8-0.5-1.5-1.2-0.6
Placebo0.10.40.2-0.00.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (BPH Impact Index -BII Scores) at 2 Weeks, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

The BPH Impact Index (BII) is a 4-item, self-administered questionnaire evaluating the impact of urinary problems on overall health and activity. Total scores range from 0 to 13; higher scores represent increased perceived impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia-lower urinary tract symptoms on overall health. Change from BL were analyzed using MMRM analysis method with an Observed Cases approach. Values are expressed as adjusted mean along with standard error. The MMRM analysis included fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit and treatment by visit interaction and the continuous fixed covariates of BL total score and BL score by visit interaction. BL is defined as earliest DB treatment start date if the subject took at least one dose of DB study drug; change from BL was calculated as Week 2, Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 values minus BL value(s). Only those par with non-missing change from baseline data were analysed (presented as n=X,X in the category titles) (NCT01777269)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 2, n=226, 227Month1, n=216, 223Month 3, n=211, 217Month 6, n=201, 195Month 9, n=188, 179Month 12, n=183, 177
Duodart-0.7-0.7-1.1-1.2-1.2-1.2
Placebo-0.3-0.7-0.9-0.6-0.7-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Perception of Treatment Benefit/Satisfaction With Treatment (Patient Perception of Study Medication - PPSM Questionnaire Scores) at 2 Weeks, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM) is a 12-item questionnaire designed to quantify the participant's perceptions and satisfaction with the effect of study treatment on control of their urinary symptoms. The total PPSM score ranges from 7 to 49, with higher scores indicating lower satisfaction. Change from BL were analyzed using MMRM analysis method with an Observed Cases approach. Values are expressed as adjusted mean along with standard error. The MMRM analysis included fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit and treatment by visit interaction and the continuous fixed covariates of BL total score and BL score by visit interaction. BL is defined as earliest DB treatment start date if the subject took at least one dose of DB study drug; change from BL was calculated as Week 2, Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 values minus BL value(s). Only those par with non-missing change from baseline data were analysed (presented as n=X,X in the category titles) (NCT01777269)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 2, n=225, 227Month1, n=216, 223Month 3, n=211, 217Month 6, n=201, 195Month 9, n=188, 179Month 12, n=182, 177
Duodart-3.4-3.4-3.8-3.6-2.9-4.6
Placebo-0.4-1.3-1.7-1.0-1.6-1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Scores Using the Observed Cases Approach at 2 Weeks, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

The IPSS questionnaire is a 7-item self-administered questionnaire designed to quantify urinary symptoms: Q1, incomplete emptying; Q2, frequency; Q3, intermittency; Q4, urgency; Q5, weak stream; Q6, straining; Q7, nocturia. The score can range from 0 to 35: mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19), or severe (20 to 35). Change from BL were analyzed using MMRM analysis method with an Observed Cases approach. Values are expressed as adjusted mean along with standard error. The MMRM analysis included fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit and treatment by visit interaction and the continuous fixed covariates of BL total score and BL score by visit interaction. BL is defined as earliest DB treatment start date if the par. took at least one dose of DB study drug; change from BL was calculated as Week 2, Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 values minus BL value(s). Only those par with non-missing change from baseline data were analysed (presented as n=X,X in the category titles) (NCT01777269)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 2, n=232, 234Month1, n=222, 231Month 3, n=217, 224Month 6, n=206, 203Month 9, n=193, 185Month 12, n=187, 184
Duodart-3.1-3.4-4.1-4.6-4.5-5.2
Placebo-1.5-2.8-2.8-2.9-3.2-3.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Scores From the Full Men's Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) at 1, 3, 6 and 9 Months

Total MSHQ score is composed of 3 domain scores: ES=sum of score for Q 1 to 3(ranges from 0 to 15), EjS=sum of scores for Q5 to 11(ranges from 1 to 35), SS=sum of scores for Q13 to 18(ranges from 6 to 30). Total MSHQ score=ES+EjS+SS and the score ranges from 7-80, with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. Change from BL at scheduled post-BL time points were analysed using MMRM analysis method with an Observed Cases approach. Values are expressed as adjusted mean along with standard error. The MMRM analysis included fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit and treatment by visit interaction and the continuous fixed covariates of BL total score and BL score by visit interaction. BL is defined as earliest DB treatment start date if the par. took at least one dose of DB study drug; change from BL was calculated as Month 1, 3, 6, 9 values minus BL value(s). Only those par with non-missing change from baseline data were analysed (presented as n=X,X in the category titles) (NCT01777269)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 1, 3, 6, and 9

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1, n=193, 192Month 3, n= 184, 181Month 6, n=179, 164Month 9, n=166, 146
Duodart-4.6-6.9-9.9-9.6
Placebo-0.5-0.5-0.8-0.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Erectile Dysfunction (ED) at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months

Erection scale is a domain of MSHQ to assess erectile dysfunction. ES is the sum of score for questions 1 to 3. The score ranges from 0 (no erection) to 15 (strong erection). Change from BL at the scheduled post-baseline time points were analyzed using MMRM analysis method with an Observed Cases approach. Values are expressed as adjusted mean along with standard error. The MMRM analysis included fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit and treatment by visit interaction and the continuous fixed covariates of BL total score and BL score by visit interaction. BL is defined as earliest DB treatment start date if the par. took at least one dose of DB study drug; change from BL was calculated as Month 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 values minus BL value(s). Only those par with non-missing change from baseline data were analysed (presented as n=X,X in the category titles) (NCT01777269)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1, n=209, 215Month 3, n= 202, 208Month 6, n= 193, 188Month 9, n=182, 169Month 12, n= 175, 168
Duodart-0.5-0.7-1.0-1.2-1.0
Placebo-0.3-0.5-0.6-0.5-0.5

[back to top]

Serum Concentrations of Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Baseline, and After 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

Blood samples for DHT analysis was collected at Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52. DHT values at a lower limit of quantification (LLQ) were imputed using 1/2 LLQ. The Baseline value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the Baseline date (latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). The LOCF method for missing data was used by carrying forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for participants with missing visit data and/or for participants who discontinued from the study. (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52

Interventionnanomole per liter (nmol/L) (Mean)
Baseline, n=120Week 26 LOCF, n=118Week 52 LOCF, n=118
Dutasteride 0.5 mg1.550.190.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, and Week 52

The DLQI is a 10-item validated measure developed specifically to assess quality of life (QoL) in participants with dermatological conditions. It assesses six domains: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work ⁄school, personal relationships, and treatment. The DLQI total is the sum of 10 questions, each ranging from 0 (unanswered/not relevant,not at all) to 3 (very much). The higher the score, the greater the impairment of (QoL). Change from Baseline in DLQI scores is defined as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the Baseline date (latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). The LOCF method for missing data was used by carrying forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for participants with missing data and/or for participants who discontinued from the study. (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, and Week 52

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Week 13 LOCFWeek 26 LOCFWeek 39 LOCFWeek 52 LOCF
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.15-0.25-0.27-0.23

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sexual Problems as Assessed by the Problem Assessment Scale of the Sexual Function Inventory (PAS SFI) at Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, and Week 52

The Problem Assessment Scale of the Sexual Function Inventory (PAS SFI) questionnaire was used to assess participant-perceived problems in sexual function using 3 questions assessing problems with sex drive, erections and ejaculation. They are scored on a 5-point scale of 0 to 4 (0=big problem, 1= medium problem, 2=small problem, 3=very small problem, 4=no problem). Total scores range from 0-12. Change from Baseline in PAS SFI scores is defined as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the Baseline date (latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). The LOCF method for missing data was used by carrying forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for participants with missing data and/or for participants who discontinued from the study. (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39 and Week 52

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Week 13 LOCFWeek 26 LOCFWeek 39 LOCFWeek 52 LOCF
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.6-0.7-0.3-0.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in Target Area Hair Count Within a 2.54 Centimeter (cm) Diameter Circle at Week 26 and Week 52

Target area hair count is based on the nonvellus hair(>= 30 micrometer[μm] in width) count within a target 2.54cm(1 inch) diameter circle at the vertex and was assessed by macrophotographic technique. A cosmetic ink dot was placed by means of a tattoo at BL on the scalp in the center of the circle as a marker to guide the placement of the hair count area at subsequent time points. If the ink dot faded between study visits, it was redone. For the macrophotography, hair was clipped before each photograph. Change from BL is defined as post-BL value minus BL value. The BL value is defined as the latest assessment on or before the BL date(latest non-missing value of either treatment start date or randomization date). The last observation carried forward(LOCF) method for missing data was used by carrying forward the last non-missing post-BL assessment value for participants with missing data and/or for participants who discontinued from the study. (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26, and Week 52

InterventionHair count (Mean)
Week 26 LOCFWeek 52 LOCF
Dutasteride 0.5 mg87.368.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in Target Area Hair Width Within a 2.54 cm Diameter Circle at Week 26 and Week 52

Target area hair width was based on the total width of the nonvellus hairs(>=30μm in width) within a target 2.54cm(1 inch) diameter circle at the vertex and was assessed by macrophotographic technique. A cosmetic ink dot was placed by means of a tattoo at BL on the scalp in the center of the circle as a marker to guide the placement of the hair count area at subsequent time points. If the ink dot faded between study visits, it was redone. For the macrophotography, hair was clipped before each photograph. Change from BL is defined as the post-BL value minus the BL value. The BL value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the BL date(latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). The LOCF method for missing data was used by carrying forward the last non-missing post-BL assessment value for participants with missing data and/or for participants who discontinued from the study. (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26, and Week 52

Interventionmicrons x 10^-3 (Mean)
Week 26 LOCFWeek 52 LOCF
Dutasteride 0.5 mg6.76.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in Terminal Hair Count Within a 2.54 cm Diameter Circle at Week 26 and Week 52

Terminal hair count was based on the terminal hair(>=60 μm in width) count within a target 2.54cm(1 inch) diameter circle at the vertex and was assessed by macrophotographic technique. A cosmetic ink dot was placed by means of a tattoo at BL on the scalp in the center of the circle as a marker to guide the placement of the hair count area at subsequent time points. If the ink dot faded between study visits, it was redone. For the macrophotography, hair was clipped before each photograph. Change from BL is defined as the post-BL value minus the BL value. BL value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the BL date(latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). The LOCF method for missing data was used by carrying forward the last non-missing post-BL assessment for participants with missing data and/or for participants who discontinued from the study. (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52

InterventionHair count (Mean)
Week 26 LOCFWeek 52 LOCF
Dutasteride 0.5 mg60.876.9

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST) at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of ALT, ALP and AST at Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52 visits and the early withdrawal visit where applicable. Change from Baseline in the ALT, ALP and AST values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment as well as for the final assessment (the last post-Baseline value in the study [final value]). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the Baseline date (latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52 visits and/or early withdrawal visit

InterventionUnits per liter (U/L) (Mean)
ALT, Week 26, n=114ALT, Week 52, n=111ALT, Final value, n=118ALP, Week 26, n=114ALP, Week 52, n=111ALP, Final value, n=118AST, Week 26, n=113AST, Week 52, n=108AST, Final value, n=118
Dutasteride 0.5 mg5.581.511.140.300.240.244.811.851.71

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at the Indicated Time Points

Vital sign monitoring included heart rate measurement at the Screening visit, Baseline visit, Weeks 13, 26, 39, and 52 visits and the early withdrawal visit if applicable. Change from Baseline in heart rate is summarized for each post-Baseline assessment as well as for the final assessment (the last post-Baseline value in the study [final value]). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the Baseline date (latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline visit, Weeks 13, 26, 39, and 52 visits and or early withdrawal visit

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Week 13, n=120Week 26, n=116Week 39, n=112Week 52, n=111Final value, n=120
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.30.62.7-0.3-0.6

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit at Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52 visits and the early withdrawal visit where applicable. Change from Baseline in the hematocrit value is summarized for each post-Baseline assessment as well as for the final assessment (the last post-Baseline value in the study [final value]). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the Baseline date (latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52 visits and/or early withdrawal visit

InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Week 26, n=114Week 52, n=111Final value, n=118
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.010.00-0.00

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin, Albumin and Total Protein at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hemoglobin, albumin and total protein at Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52 visits and the early withdrawal visit where applicable. Change from Baseline in the hemoglobin, albumin and total protein values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment as well as for the final assessment (the last post-Baseline value in the study [final value]). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the Baseline date (latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52 visits and/or early withdrawal visit

InterventionGrams per liter (g/L) (Mean)
Hemoglobin, Week 26, n=114Hemoglobin, Week 52, n=111Hemoglobin, Final value, n=118Albumin, Week 26, n=114Albumin, Week 52, n=111Albumin, Final value, n=118Total protein, Week 26, n=114Total protein, Week 52, n=111Total protein, Final value, n=118
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.61-0.94-0.69-0.64-1.42-1.31-0.17-0.55-0.40

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Platelet Count and White Blood Cell Count at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of platelet count and white blood cell count at Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52 visits and the early withdrawal visit where applicable. Change from Baseline in the platelet count and white blood cell count values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment as well as for the final assessment (the last post-Baseline value in the study [final value]). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the Baseline date (latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52 visits and/or early withdrawal visit

Intervention10^9 cells/Liter (GI/L) (Mean)
Platelet count, Week 26, n=114Platelet count,Week 52, n=109Platelet count,Final value, n=118White blood cells count, Week 26, n=114White blood cells count, Week 52, n=111White blood cells count, Final value, n=118
Dutasteride 0.5 mg3.41-1.48-1.120.050.170.13

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Potassium, Sodium, Glucose and Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of potassium, sodium, glucose and urea/BUN at Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52 visits and the early withdrawal visit where applicable. Change from Baseline in the potassium, sodium, glucose and urea/BUN values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment as well as for the final assessment (the last post-Baseline value in the study [final value]). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the Baseline date (latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52 visits and/or early withdrawal visit

InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Potassium, Week 26, n=113Potassium,, Week 52, n=108Potassium, Final value, n=118Sodium, Week 26, n=114Sodium, Week 52, n=111Sodium, Final value, n=118Glucose, Week 26, n=114Glucose, Week 52, n=111Glucose, Final value, n=118Urea/BUN , Week 26, n=114Urea/BUN , Week 52, n=111Urea/BUN , Final value, n=118
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.080.020.021.221.011.020.480.440.450.050.020.00

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Prostate-specific Antigen at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of prostate-specific antigen at Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52 visits and the early withdrawal visit where applicable. Change from Baseline in the prostate-specific antigen value is summarized for each post-Baseline assessment as well as for the final assessment (the last post-Baseline value in the study [final value]). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the Baseline date (latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52 visits and/or early withdrawal visit

InterventionMicrogram per liter (µg/L) (Mean)
Week 26, n=116Week 52, n=111Final value, n=118
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.29-0.32-0.32

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cells Count at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of the red blood cell count at Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52 visits and the early withdrawal visit where applicable. Change from Baseline in the red blood cell count value is summarized for each post-Baseline assessment as well as for the final assessment (the last post-Baseline value in the study [final value]). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the Baseline date (latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52 visits and/or early withdrawal visit

Intervention10^12 cells per liter (TI/L) (Mean)
Week 26, n=114Week 52, n=111Final value, n=118
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.010.010.01

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure at the Indicated Time Points

Blood pressure measurements were taken to observe vital signs and included systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at the Screening visit, Baseline visit, Weeks 13, 26, 39, and 52 visits and the early withdrawal visit if applicable. Change from Baseline in SBP and DBP is summarized for each post-Baseline assessment as well as for the final assessment (the last post-Baseline value in the study [final value]). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the Baseline date (latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 13, 26, 39, and 52 visits and or early withdrawal visit

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
SBP, Week 13, n=120SBP, Week 26, n=116SBP, Week 39, n=112SBP, Week 52, n=111SBP, Final value, n=120DBP, Week 13, n=120DBP, Week 26, n=116DBP, Week 39, n=112DBP, Week 52, n=111DBP, Final value, n=120
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.30.90.9-1.3-1.0-1.31.90.4-0.3-0.6

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of total bilirubin and creatinine at Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52 visits and the early withdrawal visit where applicable. Change from Baseline in the total bilirubin and creatinine values are summarized for each post-Baseline assessment as well as for the final assessment (the last post-Baseline value in the study [final value]). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the Baseline date (latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52 visits and/or early withdrawal visit

InterventionMicromoles per liter (µmol/L) (Mean)
Total bilirubin, Week 26, n=114Total bilirubin,, Week 52, n=111Total bilirubin, Final value, n=118Creatinine, Week 26, n=114Creatinine, Week 52, n=111Creatinine, Final value, n=118
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.99-0.23-0.26-1.141.731.29

[back to top]

Mean of Median Score for Panel Global Assessment of Improvement From Baseline to 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks for Vertex and Frontal Views

A central panel of 3 dermatologists independently assessed change in hair growth from Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52 using a 7-point scale: greatly decreased (-3), moderately decreased (-2), slightly decreased (-1), no change (0), slightly increased (1), moderately increased (2), and greatly increased (3). The median score, across the 3 panel members, is summarized. This assessment was performed by comparing the global photographs obtained at Baseline (Screening) with those subsequently obtained at Week 26 and Week 52. This assessment was made separately based on the global photography of the vertex and frontal views. The LOCF method for missing data was used for the assessment, if a participants was missing the Week 26 global photograph, but has a global photograph from an earlier assessment (i.e., a withdrawal visit), then that photograph was assessed during the panel review. (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Week 26 LOCF, vertex viewWeek 26 LOCF, frontal viewWeek 52 LOCF, vertex viewWeek 52 LOCF, frontal view
Dutasteride 0.5 mg1.341.211.501.40

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behavior Based on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

The C-SSRS captures occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. The number of participants answering yes/no responses to questions about suicidal ideation (Question [Que] 1 and Que 2) at Baseline and post-Baseline (since last visit) and suicidal behaviors (Que 6 - Que 10) at post-Baseline (since last visit) are presented. Questions included the presence (yes) or absence (no) of the following: Que 1 - a wish to be dead; Que 2 - nonspecific (NS) active suicidal thoughts; Que 6 - preparatory acts or behavior; Que 7 - aborted attempt; Que 8 - interrupted attempt (int. att.); Que 9 - non-fatal actual suicide attempt; Que 10 - completed suicide and non-suicidal self-injurious behavior. Final assessment (FA) is the last post-Baseline measurement during the study. (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Number)
BL, wish to be dead, n=103BL, NS active suicidal thoughts, n=103Week 26, wish to be dead, n=116Week 26, NS active suicidal thoughts, n=116Week 26 preparatory acts or behavior, n=116Week 26, aborted attempt, n=116Week 26, int. att., n=116Week 26, non-fatal actual suicide attempt, n=116Week 26, completed suicide, n=116Week 26, non-suicidal self-injurious, n=116Week 52, wish to be dead, n=111Week 52, NS active suicidal thoughts, n=111Week 52 preparatory acts or behavior, n=111Week 52, aborted attempt, n=111Week 52, interrupted attempt n=111Week 52, non-fatal actual suicide attempt, n=111Week 52, completed suicide, n=111Week 52, non-suicidal self-injurious, n=111FA, wish to be dead, n=118FA, NS active suicidal thoughts, n=118FA preparatory acts or behavior, n=118FA, aborted attempt, n=118FA, int. att., n=118FA, non-fatal actual suicide attempt, n=118FA, completed suicide, n=118FA, non-suicidal self-injurious, n=118
Dutasteride 0.5 mg20210000001000000031000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign(including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease(new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical events that jeopardize the participants or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the above definition, drug-induced liver injury, breast cancer in male participants, prostate cancer, spontaneous abortion in female partner of male participants (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: From Baseline (Week 0) until Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAny SAE
Dutasteride 0.5 mg642

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Laboratory Value Shifts From Baseline at Any Time Post-baseline

Blood samples for the assessment of the indicated laboratory parameters were taken at the Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52 visits and the early withdrawal visit where applicable. The laboratory parameters included ALP, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, total protein, sodium, potassium, albumin, glucose, creatinine, urea/BUN, hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell (RBC) count, platelet count, white blood cell (WBC) count, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). A laboratory value (LV) that is within the normal range is considered normal. A LV that is above the upper limit of the normal range is considered high abnormal. A LV that is below the lower limit of the normal range is considered low abnormal. Number of participants with any LV shifts from BL at any time post-BL are presented for, normal at BL to abnormal; normal at BL to high; normal at BL to low; normal or low at BL to high; normal or high at BL to low. (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52 visits and/or early withdrawal visit

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Hemoglobin, normal at BL to abnormal, n=98Hematocrit, normal at BL to abnormal, n=95Platelet count, normal at BL to abnormal, n=118RBC count, normal at BL to abnormal, n=99WBC count, normal at BL to abnormal, n=117Albumin, normal at BL to abnormal, n=116ALP, normal at BL to abnormal, n=118ALT, normal at BL to abnormal, n=116AST, normal at BL to abnormal, n=118Total Bilirubin, normal at BL to abnormal, n=104Creatinine, normal at BL to abnormal, n=99Glucose, normal at BL to abnormal, n=116Potassium, normal at BL to abnormal, n=118Total Protein, normal at BL to abnormal, n=118Sodium, normal at BL to abnormal, n=118Urea/BUN, normal at BL to abnormal, n=116PSA, normal at BL to abnormal, n=118Hemoglobin, normal at BL to high, n=98Hematocrit, normal at BL to high, n=95Platelet count, normal at BL to high, n=118RBC count, normal at BL to high, n=99WBC count, normal at BL to high, n=117Albumin, normal at BL to high, n=116ALP, normal at BL to high, n=118ALT, normal at BL to high, n=116AST, normal at BL to high, n=118Total Bilirubin, normal at BL to high, n=104Creatinine, normal at BL to high, n=99Glucose, normal at BL to high, n=116Potassium, normal at BL to high, n=118Total Protein, normal at BL to high, n=118Sodium, normal at BL to high, n=118Urea/BUN, normal at BL to high, n=116PSA, normal at BL to high, n=118Hemoglobin, normal at BL to low, n=98Hematocrit, normal at BL to low, n=95Platelet count, normal at BL to low, n=118RBC count, normal at BL to low, n=99WBC count, normal at BL to low, n=117Albumin, normal at BL to low, n=116ALP, normal at BL to low, n=118ALT, normal at BL to low, n=116AST, normal at BL to low, n=118Total Bilirubin, normal at BL to low, n=104Creatinine, normal at BL to low, n=99Glucose, normal at BL to low, n=116Potassium, normal at BL to low, n=118Total Protein, normal at BL to low, n=118Sodium, normal at BL to low, n=118Urea/BUN, normal at BL to low, n=116PSA, normal at BL to low, n=118Hemoglobin, normal or low at BL to high, n=118Hematocrit, normal or low at BL to high, n=106Platelet count, normal or low at BL to high, n=118RBC count, normal or low at BL to high, n=118WBC count, normal or low at BL to high, n=118Albumin, normal or low at BL to high, n=116ALP, normal or low at BL to high, n=118ALT, normal or low at BL to high, n=116AST, normal or low at BL to high, n=118Total Bilirubin, normal or low at BL to high n=104Creatinine, normal or low at BL to high, n=118Glucose, normal or low at BL to high, n=117Potassium, normal or low at BL to high, n=118Total Protein, normal or low at BL to high, n=118Sodium, normal or low at BL to high, n=118Urea/BUN, normal or low at BL to high, n=117PSA, normal or low at BL to high, n=118Hemoglobin, normal or high at BL to low, n=98Hematocrit, normal or high at BL to low, n=107Platelet count, normal or high at BL to low, n=118RBC count, normal or high at BL to low, n=99WBC count, normal or high at BL to low, n=117Albumin, normal or high at BL to low, n=118ALP, normal or high at BL to low, n=118ALT, normal or high at BL to low, n=118AST, normal or high at BL to low, n=118Total Bilirubin, normal or high at BL to low,n=118Creatinine, normal or high at BL to low, n=99Glucose, normal or high at BL to low, n=117Potassium, normal or high at BL to low, n=118Total Protein, normal or high at BL to low, n=118Sodium, normal or high at BL to low, n=118Urea/BUN, normal or high at BL to low, n=117PSA, normal or high at BL to low, n=118
Dutasteride 0.5 mg8801130176510140210100003017650140010188011000000100020000000301765014001018801100000010002000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Breast Examination Results Any Time Post-Baseline Visit

A qualitative breast examination was performed at Baseline (Week 0), at the Week 26 Visit and at the Week 52 Visit (and at the early withdrawal visit, if applicable). Participants were assessed for presence (reported as yes) and absence (reported as no) of palpable breast tissue (PBT) or nipple tenderness (NT) and/or clinically significant (CS) PBT or NT at Baseline (BL), at each scheduled Post-BL assessment. Change from BL in breast examination results included the number of participants with change from 'no (N)' at BL to 'yes (Y)' at any Post-BL assessment for the presence of PBT or NT, and the number of participants with change from N at BL in CS to Y at any Post-BL assessment in CS for PBT and for NT. BL value of an assessment is defined as the latest assessment on or before the BL date (latest non-missing value of either the treatment start date or the randomization date). (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Number)
PBT, Change from N at BL to Y, n=120PBT, CS, Y (among change from N at BL to Y), n=0PBT, CS, N (among change from N at BL to Y), n=0NT, Change from N at BL to Y, n=120NT, CS, Y (among change from N at BL to Y), n=1NT, CS, N (among change from N at BL to Y), n=0
Dutasteride 0.5 mg000110

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline (BL) in the Stage of Androgenic Alopecia (AGA) According to the Norwood-Hamilton Scale at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

"The investigator/designee assessed the stage (Stage I to Stage VII) of AGA (i.e., male pattern baldness [MPB]) by utilizing the Norwood-Hamilton scale, used to measure the progression of MPB. Stage VII indicates worse balding than Stage I. Assessment was made by direct visual examination (aided by pictures) of the participant at Screening (Baseline), Week 26, and Week 52. v, vertex; most of the hair loss (commonly seen with advancing age) is on the vertex. a, type a variant; major features are (1) the entire anterior hairline border recedes in unison; (2) there is no simultaneous balding of the vertex. The number of participants with stage changes from Baseline are summarized. The LOCF method for missing data was used by carrying forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for participants with missing data and/or for participants who discontinued from the study." (NCT01831791)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline BL Stage IIIv to W26 Stage I, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W26 Stage II, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W26 Stage IIa, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W26 Stage III, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W26 Stage IIIa, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W26 Stage IIIv, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W26 Stage IV, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W26 Stage IVa, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W26 Stage V, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W26 Stage Va, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W26 Stage VI, n=53BL Stage IV to W26 Stage I, n=46BL Stage IV to W26 Stage II, n=46BL Stage IV to W26 Stage IIa, n=46BL Stage IV to W26 Stage III, n=46BL Stage IV to W26 Stage IIIa, n=46BL Stage IV to W26 Stage IIIv, n=46BL Stage IV to W26 Stage IV, n=46BL Stage IV to W26 Stage IVa, n=46BL Stage IV to W26 Stage V, n=46BL Stage IV to W26 Stage Va, n=46BL Stage IV to W26 Stage VI, n=46BL Stage V to W26 Stage I, n=19BL Stage V to W26 Stage II, n=19BL Stage V to W26 Stage IIa, n=19BL Stage V to W26 Stage III, n=19BL Stage V to W26 Stage IIIa, n=19BL Stage V to W26 Stage IIIv, n=19BL Stage V to W26 Stage IV, n=19BL Stage V to W26 Stage IVa, n=19BL Stage V to W26 Stage V, n=19BL Stage V to W26 Stage Va, n=19BL Stage V to W26 Stage VI, n=19BL Stage IIIv to W52 Stage I, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W52 Stage II, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W52 Stage IIa, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W52 Stage III, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W52 Stage IIIa, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W52 Stage IIIv, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W52 Stage IV, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W52 Stage IVa, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W52 Stage V, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W52 Stage Va, n=53BL Stage IIIv to W52 Stage VI, n=53BL Stage IV to W52 Stage I, n=46BL Stage IV to W52 Stage II, n=46BL Stage IV to W52 Stage IIa, n=46BL Stage IV to W52 Stage III, n=46BL Stage IV to W52 Stage IIIa, n=46BL Stage IV to W52 Stage IIIv, n=46BL Stage IV to W52 Stage IV, n=46BL Stage IV to W52 Stage IVa, n=46BL Stage IV to W52 Stage V, n=46BL Stage IV to W52 Stage Va, n=46BL Stage IV to W52 Stage VI, n=46BL Stage V to W52 Stage I, n=19BL Stage V to W52 Stage II, n=19BL Stage V to W52 Stage IIa, n=19BL Stage V to W52 Stage III, n=19BL Stage V to W52 Stage IIIa, n=19BL Stage V to W52 Stage IIIv, n=19BL Stage V to W52 Stage IV, n=19BL Stage V to W52 Stage IVa, n=19BL Stage V to W52 Stage V, n=19BL Stage V to W52 Stage Va, n=19BL Stage V to W52 Stage VI, n=19
Dutasteride 0.5 mg002404520000000101529000100010310050012414028400000100019260000000204100300

[back to top]

Suicidality Assessment Score by Using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in the Double-blind Treatment Period

Assessment of suicidality were done through use of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) for suicidal ideation with the ratings 1 to 5 (1. wish to be dead, 2. Non-specific suicidal thoughts, 3..without intent, 4. with intent but no plan, 5. with plan and intent) and for suicidal behavior with the ratings 6 to 9 (6.Prep acts/behavior, 7.aborted attempt, 8. interrupted attempt and 9. actual attempt). C-SSRS was administered at Day 1, Week 12, Week 24, and the early withdrawal visit if applicable . (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Wish to be deadNon-specific suicidal thoughtsWithout intentWith intent but no planWith plan and intentPrep acts/behaviorAborted attemptInterrupted attemptActual attemptNon-suicidal self injury behavior
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0000000000
Placebo0000000000

[back to top]

Suicidality Assessment Score by Using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in the Open-label Treatment Period

Assessment of suicidality were done through use of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) for suicidal ideation with the ratings 1 to 5 (1. wish to be dead, 2. Non-specific suicidal thoughts, 3. without intent, 4. with intent but no plan, 5. with plan and intent) and for suicidal behavior with the ratings 6 to 9 (6.Prep acts/behavior, 7.aborted attempt, 8. interrupted attempt and 9. actual attempt). C-SSRS was administered at Day 1, Week 12, Week 24, and the early withdrawal visit if applicable . (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Wish to be deadNon-specific suicidal thoughtsWithout intentWith intent but no planWith plan and intentPrep acts/behaviorAborted attemptInterrupted attemptActual attemptNon-suicidal self injury behavior
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)0000000000
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)0000000000

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) in the Double-blind Treatment Period

The Baseline blood presssure assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the double-blind treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

,
Interventionmillimeter of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
SBP Week 12, n=59, 53SBP Week 24, n=57, 52DBP Week 12, n=59, 53DBP Week 24, n=57, 52
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.1-2.01.6-1.5
Placebo0.9-1.02.1-0.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Participant Satisfaction With Hair Growth as Assessed by the Total Score of the HGSS in the Open-label Treatment Period

The HGSS assessed participants satisfaction with hair appearance and growth by scoring 5 questions on a 7-point scale ranging from 1=very dissatisfied to 7=very satisfied with a maximum score of 35. The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the OL treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A decrease from Baseline indicates a worsening. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

InterventionScores on a Scale (Mean)
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)4.5
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)4.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the DLQI in the Open-label Treatment Period

The DLQI was a 10-item questionnaire designed to evaluate the effect of skin conditions (alopecia) on the participants quality of life. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3 with a maximum score of 30. Higher scores represent greater impairment in quality of life. The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the OL treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and Upto Week 24

InterventionScores on a Scale (Mean)
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)-1.0
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)-0.8

[back to top]

Incidence of Premature Discontinuations in the Double-blind Treatment Period

Participants were referred as premature discontinuations if they do not complete the double-blind period. The reasons for premature withdrawal were protocol deviation, lost to follow-up and withdrawal of consent by participants. (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo2
Dutasteride 0.5 mg6

[back to top]

Incidence of Premature Discontinuations in the Open-label Treatment Period

Participants were referred as premature discontinuations if they do not complete the open-label treatment period. The reasons for premature withdrawal were protocol deviation, lost to follow-up and withdrawal of consent by participants. (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Week 48

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)5
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)1

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Open-label Treatment Period: Albumin and Total Protein

Clinical chemistry parameters included: albumin and total protein at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the open-label treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionG/L (Mean)
Albumin OL Week 24, n=44, 47Albumin Final Value, n=44, 47Total Protein OL Week 24, n=44, 47Total Protein Final Value, n=44, 47
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)-1.1-1.1-2.4-2.4
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)-0.6-0.5-0.8-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate in the Double-blind Treatment Period

The Baseline heart rate assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the double-blind treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

,
InterventionBeats per Minute (Mean)
Week 12, n=59, 53Week 24, n=57, 52
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.6-0.7
Placebo0.30.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate in the Open-label Treatment Period

Baseline heart rate assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the open-label treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

,
InterventionBeats per Minute (Mean)
Week 12, n=46, 48Week 24, n=44, 47
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)1.11.2
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)-1.5-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Participant Satisfaction With Hair Growth as Assessed by the Total Score of the Hair Growth Satisfaction Scale (HGSS) in the Double-blind Treatment Period

The HGSS assessed participants satisfaction with hair appearance and growth by scoring 5 questions on a 7-point scale ranging from 1=very dissatisfied to 7= very satisfied with a maximum score of 35. The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the DB treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A decrease from Baseline indicates a worsening. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

,
InterventionScores on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
DB Week 12, n= 58, 53DB Week 24, n=57, 52
Dutasteride 0.5 mg2.43.2
Placebo1.3-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Participants Perception of Sexual Function Measured by Responses to the Global Assessment Questions in the Double-blind Treatment Period

The global assessment questions consist of 2 questions, recording how much the participant perceives his sexual life has changed and how he perceives his ability to achieve and maintain erections has changed, compared to how it was before he began receiving treatment in this study. The wording of these questions were based on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire, which was validated for use in the assessment of improvement in stress urinary incontinence. The questions were scored on a 7-point scale.The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the DB treatment start. (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline, Erection ability, Very Much BetterBaseline, Erection ability, Much BetterBaseline, Erection ability, A Little BetterBaseline, Erection ability, No changeBaseline, Erection ability, A Little WorseBaseline, Erection ability, Much worseBaseline, Erection ability, Very Much WorseBaseline, Sexual life, Very Much BetterBaseline, sexual life, Much BetterBaseline, sexual life, A Little BetterBaseline, sexual life, No changeBaseline, sexual life, A Little WorseBaseline, sexual life, Much worseBaseline, sexual life, Very Much WorseDB week 24, Erection ability, Very Much BetterDB week 24, Erection ability, Much BetterDB week 24, Erection ability, A Little BetterDB week 24, Erection ability, No changeDB week 24, Erection ability, A Little WorseDB week 24, Erection ability, Much worseDB week 24, Erection ability, Very Much WorseDB week 24, Sexual life, Very Much BetterDB week 24, sexual life, Much BetterDB week 24, sexual life, A Little BetterDB week 24, sexual life, No changeDB week 24, sexual life, A Little WorseDB week 24, sexual life, Much worseDB week 24, sexual life, Very Much Worse
Dutasteride 0.5 mg01155100010561000044071001239910
Placebo01154300011552001024950010347600

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Participants Perception of Sexual Function Measured by Responses to the Global Assessment Questions Open-label Treatment Period

The global assessment questions consist of 2 questions, recording how much the participant perceives his sexual life has changed and how he perceives his ability to achieve and maintain erections has changed, compared to how it was before he began receiving treatment in this study. The wording of these questions were based on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire, which was validated for use in the assessment of improvement in stress urinary incontinence. The questions were scored on a 7-point scale.The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the OL treatment start. (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
OL Baseline, Erection ability, Very Much BetterOL Baseline, Erection ability, Much BetterOL Baseline, Erection ability, A Little BetterOL Baseline, Erection ability, No changeOL Baseline, Erection ability, A Little WorseOL Baseline, Erection ability, Much worseOL Baseline, Erection ability, Very Much WorseOL Baseline, Sexual life, Very Much BetterOL Baseline, sexual life, Much BetterOL Baseline, sexual life, A Little BetterOL Baseline, sexual life, No changeOL Baseline, sexual life, A Little WorseOL Baseline, sexual life, Much worseOL Baseline, sexual life, Very Much WorseOL week 24, Erection ability, Very Much BetterOL week 24, Erection ability, Much BetterOL week 24, Erection ability, A Little BetterOL week 24, Erection ability, No changeOL week 24, Erection ability, A Little WorseOL week 24, Erection ability, Much worseOL week 24, Erection ability, Very Much WorseOL week 24, Sexual life, Very Much BetterOL week 24, sexual life, Much BetterOL week 24, sexual life, A Little BetterOL week 24, sexual life, No changeOL week 24, sexual life, A Little WorseOL week 24, sexual life, Much worseOL week 24, sexual life, Very Much Worse
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)00439500012396000043750001239400
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)10142500102406000213560002137400

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure in the Open-label Treatment Period

Baseline blood presure assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the open-label treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SBP Week 12, n=46, 48SBP Week 24, n=44, 47DBP Week 12, n=46, 48DBP Week 24, n=44, 47
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)0.10.4-0.60.9
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)-0.9-0.7-0.8-1.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Open-label Treatment Period: Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin and Total Bilirubin.

Clinical chemistry parameters included: creatinine, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the open-label treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionUMOL/L (Mean)
Creatinine OL Week 24, n=44, 47Creatinine Final Value, n=44, 47Direct bilirubin OL Week 24, n=44, 47Direct bilirubin Final Value, n=44, 47Total bilirubin OL Week 24, n=44, 47Total bilirubin Final Value, n=44, 47
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)-0.2-0.20.10.10.40.4
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)1.11.20.10.10.91.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Double-blind Treatment Period

Clinical chemistry parameters included: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the double-blind treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionIU/L (Mean)
ALT DB Week 24, n=57, 52ALT Final Value, n=58, 53ALP DB Week 24, n=57, 52ALP Final Value, n=58, 53AST DB Week 24, n=57, 51AST Final Value, n=58, 52GGT DB Week 24, n=57, 52GGT Final Value, n=58, 53
Dutasteride 0.5 mg4.03.5-4.1-4.50.50.3-1.1-1.1
Placebo0.91.0-4.8-4.80.70.6-6.4-6.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Frequency of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure of Clinical Concern in the Open-label Treatment Period

The Baseline blood presssure assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the open-label treatment start. The clinical concern range for vital signs was defined as: systolic blood pressure (lower: <80, upper: >165) and diastolic blood pressure: (lower: <40, upper: >105). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline SBP <80 mmHgBaseline SBP >165 mmHgBaseline DBP <40 mmHgBaseline DBP >105 mmHgPost Baseline SBP <80 mmHgPost Baseline SBP >165 mmHgPost Baseline DBP <40 mmHgPost Baseline DBP >105 mmHg
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)00000000
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)00000000

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Double-blind Treatment Period: Albumin and Total Protein

Clinical chemistry parameters included: albumin and total protein at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the open-label treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionG/L (Mean)
Albumin, DB Week 24, n=57, 52Albumin, Final Value, n=58, 53Total Protein, DB Week 24, n=57, 52Total Protein, Final Value, n=58, 53
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.1-0.1-0.00.1
Placebo0.20.2-0.1-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Double-blind Treatment Period: Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin and Total Bilirubin

Clinical chemistry parameters included: creatinine, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the double-blind treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionUMOL/L (Mean)
Creatinine DB Week 24, n=57, 52Creatinine Final Value, n=58, 53Direct bilirubin DB Week 24, n=57, 52Direct bilirubin Final Value, n=58, 53Total bilirubin DB Week 24, n=57, 52Total bilirubin Final Value, n=58, 53
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.7-0.8-0.3-0.2-1.1-1.0
Placebo1.71.6-0.2-0.1-1.1-1.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Double-blind Treatment Period: Glucose, Potassium, Sodium and Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)

Clinical chemistry parameters included: glucose, potassium, sodium, and urea/BUN at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the double-blind treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionMMOL/L (Mean)
Glucose DB Week 24, n=57, 52Glucose Final Value, n=58, 53Potassium DB Week 24, n=57, 51Potassium Final Value n=58, 52Sodium DB Week 24, n=57, 52Sodium Final Value, n=58, 53Urea/BUN Final Value, n=57, 52Urea/BUN Value, n=58, 53
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.00.00.00.00.20.40.00.1
Placebo0.10.10.00.00.50.50.20.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Open-label Treatment Period

Clinical chemistry parameters included: ALT, ALP, AST, and GGT at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the open-label treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionIU/L (Mean)
ALT OL Week 24, n=44, 47ALT Final Value, n=44, 47ALP OL Week 24, n=44, 47ALP Final Value, n=44, 47AST OL Week 24, n=43, 47AST Final Value, n=44, 47GGT OL Week 24, n=44, 47GGT Final Value, n=44, 47
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)-1.7-1.7-3.3-3.30.10.10.60.6
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)-1.4-1.30.00.0-0.2-0.53.73.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters in the Open-label Treatment Period: Glucose, Potassium, Sodium and Urea/BUN.

Clinical chemistry parameters included: glucose, potassium, sodium, and urea/BUN at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the open-label treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionMMOL/L (Mean)
Glucose OL Week 24, n=44, 47Glucose Final Value, n=44, 47Potassium OL Week 24, n=43, 47Potassium Final Value, n=44, 47Sodium OL Week 24, n=44, 47Sodium Final Value, n=44, 47Urea/BUN OL Week 24, n=44, 47Urea/BUN Final Value, n=44, 47
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)0.20.2-0.0-0.0-0.6-0.6-0.1-0.1
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)0.30.3-0.1-0.0-0.9-0.90.30.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameter in the Double-blind Treatment Period: Hematocrit

Hematology parameter included: hematocrit at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the double-blind treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionProportion of RBCs (Mean)
DB Week 24, n=55, 51Final Value, n=56, 52
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.00.0
Placebo-0.0-0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameter in the Double-blind Treatment Period: Hemoglobin

Hematology parameter included: hemoglobin at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the double-blind treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionG/L (Mean)
DB Week 24, n=55, 51Final Value, n=56, 52
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.8-0.8
Placebo-2.0-2.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameter in the Double-blind Treatment Period: Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count

Hematology parameter included: RBC at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the double-blind treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionT/L (Mean)
DB Week 24, n=55, 51Final Value, n=56, 52
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0.00.0
Placebo-0.0-0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameter in the Open-label Treatment Period: Hematocrit

Hematology parameter included: hematocrit at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the open-label treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionProportion of RBCs (Mean)
OL Week 24, n=43, 47Final Value, n=43, 47
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)0.00.0
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)0.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameter in the Open-label Treatment Period: Hemoglobin

Hematology parameters included: hemoglobin at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the open-label treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionG/L (Mean)
OL Week 24, n=43, 47Final Value, n=43, 47
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)-1.4-1.4
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)-1.5-1.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameter in the Open-label Treatment Period: Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count

Hematology parameter included: RBC at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the open-label treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionT/L (Mean)
OL Week 24, n=43, 47Final Value, n=43, 47
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)-0.1-0.1
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)-0.1-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameters in the Double-blind Treatment Period

Hematology parameters included: platelet count, white blood cell (WBC) count, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, segmented neutrophils and total neutrophils at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the double-blind treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionGiga per Liter (GI/L) (Mean)
Platelet Count DB Week 24, n=54, 47Platelet Count Final Value, n=55, 48WBC DB Week 24, n=55, 51WBC Final Value, n=56, 52Basophils DB Week 24, n=50, 46Basophils Final Value, n=51, 47Eosinophils DB Week 24, n=50, 46Eosinophils Final Value, n=51, 47Lymphocytes DB Week 24, n=50, 46Lymphocytes Final Value, n=51, 47Monocytes DB Week 24, n=50, 46Monocytes Final Value, n=51, 47Segmented Neutrophils DB Week 24, n=50, 46Segmented Neutrophils Final Value, n=51, 47Total Neutrophils DB Week 24, n=50, 46Total Neutrophils Final Value, n=51, 47
Dutasteride 0.5 mg9.69.00.10.1-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.1-0.0-0.0-0.00.20.20.20.2
Placebo2.22.30.10.1-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.00.00.10.00.00.10.10.10.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameters in the Open-label Treatment Period

Hematology parameters included: platelet count, white blood cell (WBC) count, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, segmented neutrophils, and total neutrophils at the indicated time points (Week 24 and final value). The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the open-label treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. A final value for each period is defined as the latest post-Baseline value available in the period. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionGiga per Liter (GI/L) (Mean)
Platelet Count OL Week 24, n=42, 45Platelet Count Final Value, n=42, 45WBC OL Week 24, n=42, 47WBC Final Value, n=42, 47Basophils OL Week 24, n=39, 44Basophils Final Value, n=40, 44Eosinophils OL Week 24, n=39, 44Eosinophils Final Value, n=40, 44Lymphocytes OL Week 24, n=39, 44Lymphocytes Final Value, n=40, 44Monocytes OL Week 24, n=39, 44Monocytes Final Value, n=40, 44Segmented Neutrophils OL Week 24, n=39, 44Segmented Neutrophils Final Value, n=40, 44Total Neutrophils OL Week 24, n=39, 44Total Neutrophils Final Value, n=40, 44
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)-2.5-3.40.20.10.00.00.00.00.10.1-0.0-0.00.00.00.00.0
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)2.12.10.20.1-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.00.20.20.20.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Individual Domain Scores (Erectile Function, Orgasmic Function, Sexual Desire, Intercourse Satisfaction and Overall Sexual Satisfaction) of the IIEF in the Double-blind Treatment Period

The IIEF is a validated 15-item questionnaire with individual items of the questionnaire assigned to five separate domains of sexual function (i.e., erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction). The IIEF was employed to assess treatment-related changes in men with erectile dysfunction. Overall score range is 0-75. The erectile function score range is 0-30, intercourse satisfaction score range is 0-15, orgasmic function score range is 0-10, sexual desire score range is 0-10, overall satisfaction score range is 0-10. A decrease from Baseline indicates a worsening. The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the DB treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24

,
InterventionScores on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Erectile Function DB Week 4, n=56, 54Erectile Function DB Week 12, n= 59, 53Erectile Function DB Week 24, n=57, 52Intercourse satisfaction DB Week 4, n=56, 54Intercourse satisfaction DB Week 12, n=59, 53Intercourse satisfaction DB Week 24, n=57, 52Orgasmic function DB Week 4, n=56, 54Orgasmic function DB Week 12, n=59, 53Orgasmic function DB Week 24, n=57, 52Sexual desire DB Week 4, n=56, 54Sexual desire DB Week 12, n=59, 53Sexual desire DB Week 24, n=57, 52Overall sexual satisfaction DB Week 4, n=56, 54Overall sexual satisfaction DB Week 12, n=59, 53Overall sexual satisfaction DB Week 24, n=57, 51
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.3-1.3-1.20.0-0.2-0.40.1-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.4-0.20.1-0.2-0.2
Placebo-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.3-0.1-0.3-0.00.0-0.0-0.4-0.2-0.2-0.1-0.1-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Individual Domain Scores (Erectile Function, Orgasmic Function, Sexual Desire, Intercourse Satisfaction and Overall Sexual Satisfaction) of the IIEF in the Open-label Treatment Period

The IIEF is a validated 15-item questionnaire with individual items of the questionnaire assigned to five separate domains of sexual function (i.e., erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction). The IIEF was employed to assess treatment-related changes in men with erectile dysfunction. Overall score range is 0-75. The erectile function score range is 0-30, intercourse satisfaction score range is 0-15, orgasmic function score range is 0-10, sexual desire score range is 0-10, overall satisfaction score range is 0-10. A decrease from Baseline indicates a worsening. The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the OL treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24

,
InterventionScores on a Scale (Mean)
Erectile Function OL Week 4, n=47, 48Erectile Function OL Week 12, n= 46, 48Erectile Function OL Week 24, n=44, 47Intercourse satisfaction OL Week 4, n=47, 48Intercourse satisfaction OL Week 12, n= 46, 48Intercourse satisfaction OL Week 24, n=44, 47Orgasmic function OL Week 4, n=47, 48Orgasmic function OL Week 12, n= 46, 48Orgasmic function OL Week 24, n=44, 47Sexual desire OL Week 4, n=47, 48Sexual desire OL Week 12, n= 46, 48Sexual desire OL Week 24, n=44, 47Overall sexual satisfaction OL Week 4, n=47, 48Overall sexual satisfaction OL Week 12, n= 46, 48Overall sexual satisfaction OL Week 24, n=44, 47
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)-0.1-0.3-1.40.0-0.1-0.50.1-0.1-0.40.0-0.1-0.10.10.2-0.1
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)0.0-0.10.00.1-0.2-0.10.10.00.10.1-0.2-0.00.0-0.2-0.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in the Double-blind Treatment Period

The DLQI was a 10-item questionnaire designed to evaluate the effect of skin conditions (alopecia) on the participants quality of life. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3 with a maximum score of 30. Higher scores represent greater impairment in quality of life. The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the DB treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

,
InterventionScores on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
DB Week 12, n= 58, 53DB Week 24, n=57, 52
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.40.2
Placebo0.20.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Score of the IIEF in the Double-blind Treatment Period

The IIEF is a validated 15-item questionnaire with individual items of the questionnaire assigned to five separate domains of sexual function (i.e., erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction). The IIEF was employed to assess treatment-related changes in men with erectile dysfunction. Overall score range is 0-75. The erectile function score range is 0-30, intercourse satisfaction score range is 0-15, orgasmic function score range is 0-10, sexual desire score range is 0-10, overall satisfaction score range is 0-10. A decrease from Baseline indicates a worsening. The change from Baseline values are presented for Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24. The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the DB treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24

,
InterventionScores on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
DB Week 4, n=56, 54DB Week 12, n= 59, 53DB Week 24, n=57, 51
Dutasteride 0.5 mg-0.0-2.2-1.2
Placebo-1.4-0.9-1.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Score of the IIEF in the Open-label Treatment Period

The IIEF is a validated 15-item questionnaire with individual items of the questionnaire assigned to five separate domains of sexual function (i.e., erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction). The IIEF was employed to assess treatment-related changes in men with erectile dysfunction. Overall score range is 0-75. The erectile function score range is 0-30, intercourse satisfaction score range is 0-15, orgasmic function score range is 0-10, sexual desire score range is 0-10, overall satisfaction score range is 0-10. A decrease from Baseline indicates a worsening. The change from Baseline values are presented for Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24. The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the DB treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24

,
InterventionScores on a Scale (Mean)
OL Week 4, n=47, 48OL Week 12, n=46, 48OL Week 24, n=44, 47
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)0.2-0.3-2.6
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)0.4-0.6-0.1

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With a Change in Sexual Function Defined as a Negative Change From Baseline in the IIEF Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) Score of >=4 Units in the Open-label Treatment Period

The IIEF is a validated 15-item questionnaire with individual items of the questionnaire assigned to five separate domains of sexual function (i.e., erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction). The IIEF was employed to assess treatment-related changes in men with erectile dysfunction. The erectile function domain of the IIEF (IIEF-EF) includes Questions 1 through 5 and Question 15 (maximum score of 30). A clinically meaningful gradient of severity of erectile dysfunction (ED) has been developed, indicating that a score of greater than 25 represents an individual without ED while men scoring <=25 may be classified as having ED. The values are presented for Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24. The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the DB treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
OL Week 4OL Week 12OL Week 24
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)235
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)221

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Change in Sexual Function Defined as a Negative Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) Score of >=4 Units in the Double-blind Treatment Period

The IIEF is a validated 15-item questionnaire with individual items of the questionnaire assigned to five separate domains of sexual function (i.e., erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction). The IIEF was employed to assess treatment-related changes in men with erectile dysfunction. The erectile function domain of the IIEF (IIEF-EF) includes Questions 1 through 5 and Question 15 (maximum score of 30). A clinically meaningful gradient of severity of erectile dysfunction (ED) has been developed, indicating that a score of greater than 25 represents an individual without ED while men scoring <=25 may be classified as having ED. The values are presented for Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24. The Baseline assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the DB treatment start. Change from Baseline is post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
DB Week 4DB Week 12DB Week 24
Dutasteride 0.5 mg176
Placebo343

[back to top]

Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest in the Double-blind and Open-label Combined Periods

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs of special interest included those of sexual function: breast disorders (breast enlargement and breast tenderness), prostate cancer, cardiovascular events, and possible suicidality-related AEs (PSRAEs). Infrequent AEs of special interest included breast cancer, allergic reactions, depressed mood, hair changes, interference with formation of external genitalia in a male fetus, potential for decreased male fertility, and testicular pain and swelling. Special interest AEs are groups of MedDRA terms which have been defined in the analysis plan. (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Altered (decreased libido)ImpotenceEjaculation disordersBreast disorderProstate cancerCardiovascular adverse eventInfrequent adverse events
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)1810002

[back to top]

Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest in the Double-blind Treatment Period

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs of special interest included those of sexual function: breast disorders (breast enlargement and breast tenderness), prostate cancer, cardiovascular events, and possible suicidality-related AEs (PSRAEs). Infrequent AEs of special interest included breast cancer, allergic reactions, depressed mood, hair changes, interference with formation of external genitalia in a male fetus, potential for decreased male fertility, and testicular pain and swelling. Special interest AEs are groups of MedDRA terms which have been defined in the analysis plan. (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Altered (decreased libido)ImpotenceEjaculation disordersBreast disorderProstate cancerCardiovascular adverse eventInfrequent adverse events
Dutasteride 0.5 mg1710001
Placebo2300000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest in the Open-label Treatment Period

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs of special interest included those of sexual function: breast disorders (breast enlargement and breast tenderness), prostate cancer, cardiovascular events, and possible suicidality-related AEs (PSRAEs). Infrequent AEs of special interest included breast cancer, allergic reactions, depressed mood, hair changes, interference with formation of external genitalia in a male fetus, potential for decreased male fertility, and testicular pain and swelling. Special interest AEs are groups of MedDRA terms which have been defined in the analysis plan. (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Altered (decreased libido)ImpotenceEjaculation disordersBreast disorderProstate cancerCardiovascular adverse eventInfrequent adverse events
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)1100001
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)2100000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs and PSRAEs in the Double-blind and Open-label Combined Periods

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.. SAE is defined as any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment, all events of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinemia, breast cancer in male participants, or spontaneous abortion in female partner of male participant. The PSRAE form was used in this study to collect detailed information on the circumstances of reported AEs which, in the investigator's opinion, were possibly suicidality-related. (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAny SAEPSRAE
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)2510

[back to top]

Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs and PSRAEs in the Open-label Treatment Period

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.. SAE is defined as any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment, all events of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinemia, breast cancer in male participants, or spontaneous abortion in female partner of male participant. The PSRAE form was used in this study to collect detailed information on the circumstances of reported AEs which, in the investigator's opinion, were possibly suicidality-related. (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAny SAEPSRAE
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)1500
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)1310

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Frequency of Heart Rate of Clinical Concern in the Double-blind Treatment Period

The Baseline heart rate assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the double-blind treatment start. The clinical concern range for heart rate was defined as: (lower: <40, upper: >100). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline <40Baseline >100Post- Baseline <40Post- Baseline >100
Dutasteride 0.5 mg0102
Placebo0101

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Frequency of Heart Rate of Clinical Concern in the Open-label Treatment Period

Baseline heart rate assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the open-label treatment start. The clinical concern range for heart rate was defined as: (lower: <40, upper: >100). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline <40Baseline >100Post- Baseline <40Post- Baseline >100
Dutasteride 0.5 mg (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)0105
Placebo (DB)/Dutasteride 0.5 mg (OL)0103

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Frequency of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure of Clinical Concern in the Double-blind Treatment Period

The Baseline blood presssure assessment was defined as the latest assessment on or before the double-blind treatment start. The clinical concern range for vital signs was defined as: Systolic blood pressure (lower: <80, upper: >165) and diastolic blood pressure: (lower: <40, upper: >105). (NCT02014584)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline SBP <80 mmHgBaseline SBP >165 mmHgBaseline DBP <40 mmHgBaseline DBP >105 mmHgPost Baseline SBP <80 mmHgPost Baseline SBP >165 mmHgPost Baseline DBP <40 mmHgPost Baseline DBP >105 mmHg
Dutasteride 0.5 mg00000002
Placebo00000001

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants in a Hospital Ward

Details of number of participants in different types of wards was recorded. Types of wards included general ward, recovery, intensive care unit, multiple ward types and others (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
General wardRecoveryOther
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg010
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg201

[back to top]

Number of Participants With IPSS Improvement From Baseline

Improvement in IPSS was categorized as improvement, no change and worsening. Improvement defined as greater than or equal to 2 points, greater than or equal to 3 points and greater than or equal to 25 percent in participants at months 3,6,9,12,15,18,21 and 24 . Baseline value was defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date. Change from Baseline was reported based on the LOCF. Change from Baseline defined as difference between Post-Baseline value and Baseline value. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3, 6, 9,12,15,18,21 and 24 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Month 3,>= 3 units, n=299, 296Month 3,>= 2 units, n=299,296Month 3,>= 25percent, n=299, 296Month 6,>= 3 units, n=300, 298Month 6,>= 2 units, n=300, 298Month 6,>= 25percent, n=300, 298Month 9,>= 3 units, n=300, 298Month 9,>= 2 units, n=300, 298Month 9,>= 25percent, n=300, 298Month 12,>= 3 units, n=300, 298Month 12,>= 2 units, n=300, 298Month 12,>= 25percent, n=300, 298Month 15,>= 3 units, n=300, 298Month 15,>= 2 units, n=300, 298Month 15,>= 25percent, n=300, 298Month 18,>= 3 units, n=300, 298Month 18,>= 2 units, n=300, 298Month 18,>= 25percent, n=300, 298Month 21,>= 3 units, n=300, 298Month 21,>= 2 units, n=300, 298Month 21,>= 25percent, n=300, 298Month 24,>= 3 units, n=300, 298Month 24,>= 2 units, n=300, 298Month 24,>= 25percent, n=300, 298
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg157176123156176133177193150171191154186203160171187148178194161184197169
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg160190134156179131157185128154179131171186133156173136169186141156175137

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AE) and Serious AE (SAE)

An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject or clinical investigation subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A SAE is defined as resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation that is medically important, All events of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinaemia, male breast cancer and spontaneous abortion of a female partner of a male subject (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any Non-serious AEAny SAE
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg20849
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg20352

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)

Total serum PSA concentrations were assessed at pre-screening, month 6, 12 and 24. Change from baseline total PSA was compared in terms of combination treatment (Dut plus Tam) versus tamsulosin treatment at each scheduled post-baseline assessment using a general linear model with effects for treatment and baseline total PSA. Baseline value was defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date. Change from Baseline defined as difference between Post-Baseline value and Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Baseline 6, 12 and 24 Months

,
Interventionnanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Month 6, n=292, 294Month 12, n=293, 294Month 24, n=293, 295
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg-1.7-1.9-2.0
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg0.20.20.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Problem Assessment Scale of the Sexual Function Inventory (PAS-SFI)

PAS SFI consists of three questions each with a range of 0 (Big Problem) to 4 (No Problem). PAS SFI was administered at screening, Baseline and at each month 12 and 24. The total PSI is the sum of the three questions; the total score range is 0 to 12. Change from Baseline PAS SFI at each scheduled post-baseline assessment was compared in terms of combination treatment (Dut plus Tam) versus tamsulosin treatment using t-tests from a general linear model with effects for treatment, country, and Baseline PAS SFI. Baseline value was defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date. Change from Baseline defined as difference between Post-Baseline value and Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 and 24 Months

,
InterventionScores on scale (Mean)
Month 12, n=291, 293Month 24, n=291, 294
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg-0.91-0.82
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg0.11-0.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual Volume

Post void residual volume was measured suprapubically by ultrasound (immediately following the urinary flow measurement). Post void residual volume change from Baseline distribution at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment was compared with combination treatment (Dut plus Tam) versus tamsulosin treatment using a nonparametric van Elteren test. Baseline value was defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date. Change from Baseline defined as difference between Post-Baseline value and Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months

,
InterventionmL (Mean)
Month 6, n=288, 290Month 12, n=291, 292Month 18, n=291, 292Month 24, n=291, 292
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg-3.0-1.4-1.3-2.6
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg-4.81.5-2.62.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Maximum Urine Flow Rate (Qmax) by LOCF Approach

Qmax is defined as maximum urine flow. Qmax was measured with Uroflow meter (Urodyn 1000) at Screening, Baseline, and at Months 6,12,18 and 24. Change from Baseline Qmax at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment was compared in terms of combination treatment (Dut plus Tam) versus tamsulosin treatment using t-tests from a general linear model with effects for treatment, country, and Baseline Qmax. Baseline value was defined as the latest non-missing assessment either treatment start date or randomization date. Change from Baseline defined as difference between Post-Baseline value and Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months

,
Interventionmilliliter per second (mL/sec) (Mean)
Month 6, n=270, 274Month 12, n=286, 287Month 18, n=287, 288Month 24, n=287,290
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg1.541.622.362.27
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg0.620.630.900.93

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach at 24 Months

IPSS (also called IPSS total score) is the sum of the seven questions with each score ranging from 0 (best) to 5 (worst). IPSS was self administered at screening, Baseline and each time-point of Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24. Seven questions included are incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining and nocturia. The total IPSS score can range from 0-35 with severity catagories of mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19) or severe (20 to 35). LOCF is defined as carrying forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for participants with missing visit data and/or for participants who discontinued from the study. Baseline value is defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date. Month 24 is the primary timepoint and earlier timepoints are considered secondary. Change from Baseline defined as difference between Post-Baseline value and Baseline value. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months

,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Month 3, n=299, 296Month 6, n=300, 298Month 9, n=300, 298Month 12,n= 300, 298Month 15, n=300, 298Month 18, n=300, 298Month 21, n=300, 298Month 24, n=300, 298
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg-3.28-3.36-4.28-4.30-4.90-4.54-4.66-4.96
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg-4.07-3.73-4.14-3.93-3.95-3.84-3.94-3.53

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in BPH Impact Index (BII) by LOCF Approach

The BII consists of four questions and BII total score is the sum of four questions. Total score range is 0 (no problem) to 13 (worst value). Baseline value was defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date. Change from Baseline BII at each scheduled post-baseline assessment was compared in terms of combination treatment (Dut plus Tam) versus tamsulosin treatment using t-tests from a general linear model with effects for treatment, country, and Baseline BII. Change from Baseline was summarized using LOCF approaches. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Baseline 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 Months

,
InterventionScores on scale (Mean)
Month 3, n=299, 296Month 6, n=300, 298Month 9, n=300, 298Month 12, n=300, 298Month 15, n=300, 298Month 18, n=300, 298Month 21, n=300, 298Month 24, n=300, 298
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg-1.23-1.08-1.26-1.24-1.41-1.28-1.27-1.48
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg-1.48-1.28-1.55-1.39-1.30-1.16-1.12-1.02

[back to top]

Number of Hospitalization Days

Duration of hospitalization days due to AUR or BPH-related surgery was recorded. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

InterventionDays (Median)
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg10.0
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg9.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Qmax Improvement From Baseline by LOCF Approach.

Qmax change from Baseline was presented using six improvement levels: >0 milliliter per second (mL/sec) and >=1 mL/sec through >=5mL/sec. Qmax percentage change from Baseline was presented using six improvement levels: >0%, >=10%, >=20%, >=30%, >=40%, and >=50%. Here, Qmax improvement of >= 3 mL/sec and Qmax percentage of >= 30 % for 24 Months has been summarized. Baseline value is defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date. Change from Baseline defined as difference between Post-Baseline value and Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Baseline 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Month 6, >= 3 mL/sec, n=270, 274Month 6, >= 3 %, n=270, 274Month 12, >= 3 mL/sec, n=286, 287Month 12, >= 3 %, n=286, 287Month 18, >= 3 mL/sec, n=287, 288Month 18, >= 3 %, n= 287, 288Month 24, >= 3 mL/sec, n=287, 290Month 24, >= 30 %, n=287, 290
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg8686102107115111121119
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg6970647380817771

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Suicidal Behavior

Suicidality was assessed utilizing the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). It included tabular summaries of suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior questions that were administered. Assessments were carried out at Screening, Month 6, Month 12, and Month 24 (or end of treatment) visits. C-SSRS included Question1-2 were for suicidal ideation Question 1: Passive: wish to be dead, Question 2: Active: Non-specific (no method, intent or plan). Questions 6-10 were for suicidal behavior, Question 6: Preparatory Acts or Behavior, Question 7: any aborted attempt, Question 8: Any interrupted attempts, Question 9: Any non-fatal actual suicide attempt, Question 10: Completed suicide. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: 6, 12, 18 , 24 months and final assessment

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Month 6, Suicidal ideation, Q1, n=289, 285Month 6, Suicidal ideation, Q2, n=289, 285Month 6, Suicidal behavior, Q6, n=289, 285Month 6, Suicidal behavior, Q7, n=289, 285Month 6, Suicidal behavior, Q8, n=289, 285Month 6, Suicidal behavior, Q9, n=289, 285Month 6, Suicidal behavior, Q10, n=289, 285Month 12, Suicidal ideation, Q1, n=279, 273Month 12, Suicidal ideation, Q2, n=279, 273Month 12, Suicidal behavior, Q6, n=279, 273Month 12, Suicidal behavior, Q7, n=279, 273Month 12, Suicidal behavior, Q8, n=279, 273Month 12, Suicidal behavior, Q9, n=279, 273Month 12, Suicidal behavior, Q10, n=279, 273Month 24, Suicidal ideation, Q1, n=261, 251Month 24, Suicidal ideation, Q2, n=261, 251Month 12, Suicidal behavior, Q6, n=261, 251Month 12, Suicidal behavior, Q7, n=261, 251Month 12, Suicidal behavior, Q8, n=261, 251Month 12, Suicidal behavior, Q9, n=261, 251Month 12, Suicidal behavior, Q10, n=261, 251Final assessment, Suicidal ideation,Q1, n=288, 285Final assessment, Suicidal ideation,Q2, n=288, 285Final assessment, Suicidal behavior,Q6, n=288, 285Final assessment, Suicidal behavior,Q7, n=288, 285Final assessment, Suicidal behavior,Q8, n=288, 285Final assessment, Suicidal behavior,Q9, n=288, 285Final assessment, Suicidal behavior,Q10,n=288, 285
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg0000000000000010000001000000
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg0000000000000000000000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Threshold Clinical Chemistry Value.

Clinical chemistry laboratory parameters assessed included albumin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatinine, glucose, potassium, sodium, total bilirubin, total protein and urea/blood urea nitrogen (BUN). Threshold factors are in the below table. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
albumin, <0.90 X LLN, n=289, 292albumin, >1.20 X ULN, n=289, 292ALT, >3.00 X ULN, n=289, 292ALP, > 1.50 X ULN, n=289, 292AST, >3.00 X ULN, n=288, 292creatinine, <0.50 X LLN, n=289, 292creatinine, >3.00 X ULN, n=289, 292glucose, <0.70 X LLN, n=288, 292glucose, >1.75 X ULN, n=280, 285potassium, <0.75 X LLN, n=288, 292potassium, >1.40 X ULN, n=288, 292sodium, <0.90 X LLN, n=289, 292sodium, >1.15 X ULN, n=289, 292total bilirubin, >2.50 X ULN, n=289, 292total protein, <0.80 X LLN, n=289, 292total protein, >1.15 X ULN, n=289, 292Urea/BUN, <0.50 X LLN, n=289, 292Urea/BUN, >2.00 X ULN, n=289, 292
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg0000100013000000000
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg0000000013000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Threshold Hematology Value.

The threshold laboratory values are defined in terms of a multiplicative factor of the testing laboratory's normal range. A laboratory value that is above the upper limit factor multiplied by the upper limit of the normal (ULN) range is considered a high threshold value. A laboratory value that is below the lower limit factor multiplied by the lower limit of the normal (LLN) range is considered a low threshold value. Hematology laboratory parameters assessed included hemoglobin (Hgb), platelet count, white blood cell count (WBC) and red blood cell (RBC) count. Threshold factors are in the below table. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hgb, <0.75 X LLN, n=287, 291Platelet count, <0.75 X LLN, n=284, 283Platelet count, >1.50 X ULN, n=285, 285RBC, <0.50 X LLN, n=287, 291WBC, <0.50 X LLN, n=287, 291WBC, >3.00 X ULN, n=287, 291
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg010000
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg060000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Vital Signs Exceeding Threshold Values

Vital signs included assessment of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate. Threshold ranges for SBP ranged from < 80 mmHg (millimeter of mercury) (lower) to > 165 mmHg (upper); for DBP ranged from < 40 mmHg (lower) to > 105 mmHg (upper) and heart rate < 40 beats per minute (bpm) (lower) to > 100 bpm (upper). (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SBP, < 80 mmHgSBP, > 165 mmHgSBP, either thresholdDBP, < 40 mmHgDBP, > 105 mmHgDBP, either thresholdHeart rate, < 40 bpmHeart rate, > 100 bpmHeart rate, either threshold
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg0131302201414
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg0101006601111

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hospital Admissions

Details of participants who were admitted to hospitals related to AUR or BPH-Related surgery has been recorded. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Out-patientIn-patient
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg03
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg56

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With AUR

AUR is defined as condition when the participant is unable to urinate and requires bladder catheterization. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
OverallYear 1 subsetYear 2 subset
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg220
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg1385

[back to top]

Percent Change in Prostate Volume From Baseline

Prostate Volume measurements were conducted annually using Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). The following calculation was utilized to assess the prostate volume (cc): pi/6 (Anteroposterior Width multiplied by Cephalocaudal Width multiplied by Transverse Width). Post-Baseline prostate volume was calculated at 12 and 24 months. Baseline value was defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date. Change from Baseline was reported based on the LOCF. Change from Baseline defined as difference between Post-Baseline value and Baseline value and reported as a percentage. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: Baseline,12 and 24 months

,
InterventionCubic centimeters (cc) (Mean)
Month 12, n=287, 286Month 24, n=287, 286
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg-22.8-24.8
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg0.23.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Digital Rectal Examination (DRE)

DRE evaluation was carried out from normal/diffusely enlarged at Baseline to focal abnormalities at any time post-Baseline. DRE was assessed at screening visit, Month 6, 12, 18 , 24 and final assessment is the latest post-Baseline evaluation that was available. Here, participants with focal abnormalities are summarized. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: 6, 12, 18 , 24 months and final assessment

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Month 6, n=287, 285Month 12, n=279, 272Month 18, n=267, 258Month 24, n=261, 252Final Assessment, n=296, 295
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg911121315
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg111061010

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Qualitative Breast Examination

Qualitative breast examination included palpable breast tissue and nipple tenderness. Here, participants with clinically significant abnormalities for palpable breast tissue and nipple tenderness are summarized. Qualitative breast examination was done at screening visit, Month 6, 12, 18 , 24 and final assessment (latest post-Baseline evaluation that was available). Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02058368)
Timeframe: 6, 12, 18 , 24 months and final assessment

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Palpable breast tissue, Month 6, n=289, 284Nipple tenderness,Month 6, n=289, 284Palpable breast tissue, Month 12, n=279, 273Nipple tenderness,Month 12, n=279, 273Palpable breast tissue, Month 18, n=267, 258Nipple tenderness,Month 18, n=267, 258Palpable breast tissue, Month 24, n=262, 252Nipple tenderness, Month 24, n=262, 252Palpable breast tissue,final assessment, n=296,296Nipple tenderness,final assessment, n=296, 296
Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg0021000000
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg0010100000

[back to top]