Page last updated: 2024-12-08

latanoprost

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth

Description

Latanoprost: A prostaglandin F analog used to treat OCULAR HYPERTENSION in patients with GLAUCOMA. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

latanoprost : A prostaglandin Falpha that is the isopropyl ester prodrug of latanoprost free acid. Used in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID5311221
CHEMBL ID1051
CHEBI ID6384
SCHEMBL ID24698
MeSH IDM0195347

Synonyms (105)

Synonym
CHEMBL1051
xa-41
latanoprost (isopropyl ester)
phxa-41
gtpl1961
ar-202
nova-21027
t-2345
phxa41
xa41
phxa34 [as 15(r,s)-isomer]
catioprost
l-ppds
xalatan
latanoprost [usan:inn:ban]
5-heptenoic acid, 7-(3,5-dihydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-5-phenylpentyl)cyclopentyl)-, 1-methylethyl ester, (1r-(1-alpha(z),2-beta(r*),3-alpha,5-alpha))-
xa 41
MLS001424106
latanoprost
isopropyl (z)-7-((1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-((3r)-3-hydroxy-5-phenylpentyl)cyclopentyl)-5-heptenoate
latanoprostum
isopropyl (5z,9alpha,11alpha,15r)-9,11,15-trihydroxy-17-phenyl-18,19,20-trinorprost-5-en-1-oate
phxa 41
CHEBI:6384 ,
smr000466354
MLS000759468
propan-2-yl (5z)-7-{(1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-[(3r)-3-hydroxy-5-phenylpentyl]cyclopentyl}hept-5-enoate
DB00654
130209-82-4
xalatan (tn)
D00356
latanoprost (jan/usp/inn)
HMS2051H11
HMS2089J17
bdbm50240648
T2345 ,
propan-2-yl (z)-7-[(1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-[(3r)-3-hydroxy-5-phenylpentyl]cyclopentyl]hept-5-enoate
A806039
(z)-7-[(1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-[(3r)-3-hydroxy-5-phenylpentyl]cyclopentyl]-5-heptenoic acid propan-2-yl ester
propan-2-yl (z)-7-[(1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-bis(oxidanyl)-2-[(3r)-3-oxidanyl-5-phenyl-pentyl]cyclopentyl]hept-5-enoate
NCGC00246969-01
unii-6z5b6hvf6o
6z5b6hvf6o ,
S4709
CCG-100946
latanoprost [mi]
isopropyl (z)-7-[(1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-[(3r)-3-hydroxy-5-phenylpentyl]cyclopentyl]-5-heptenoate
latanoprost [usp monograph]
iyuzeh
latanoprost [ep monograph]
latanoprost [inn]
latanoprost [usp-rs]
rocklatan component latanoprost
latanoprost component of rocklatan
latanoprost [mart.]
latanoprost [orange book]
latanoprost [who-dd]
xelpros
xalacom component latanoprost
5-heptenoic acid, 7-(3,5-dihydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-5-phenylpentyl)cyclopentyl)-1-methylethyl ester, (1r-(1.alpha.(z),2.beta.(r*),3.alpha.,5.alpha.))-
latanoprost [vandf]
latanoprost [jan]
latanoprost [usan]
HY-B0577
AB00640005-04
NC00196
SCHEMBL24698
AB00640005-06
(z)-isopropyl 7-((1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-((r)-3-hydroxy-5-phenylpentyl)cyclopentyl)hept-5-enoate
GGXICVAJURFBLW-CEYXHVGTSA-N
(5z)-7-[(1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-[(3r)-3-hydroxy-5-phenylpentyl]cyclopentyl]-5-heptanoic acid 1-methylethyl ester
unii-8s5fb3xxg8
AKOS024458331
L0262
tris(2,4-dimethylphenyl)phosphine-5,5',5-trisulfonic acid trisodium salt
mfcd00216074
DTXSID1041057 ,
J-005764
(1r,2r,3r,5s,3''r)-7-[3,5-dihydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-5-phenyl-pentyl)-cyclopentyl]-hept-5-enoic acid isopropyl ester
SR-01000759428-4
sr-01000759428
latanoprost, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
propan-2-yl (5z)-7-[(1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-[(3r)-3-hydroxy-5-phenylpentyl]cyclopentyl]hept-5-enoate
AS-75099
EX-A1770
HMS3715N22
8S5FB3XXG8 ,
155551-81-8
5-heptenoic acid, 7-(3,5-dihydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-5-phenylpentyl)cyclopentyl)-, 1-methylethyl ester
latanoprost, (+/-)-
Q634959
AMY30089
NCGC00246969-06
5-heptenoic acid, 7-[(1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-[(3r)-3-hydroxy-5-phenylpentyl]cyclopentyl]-, 1-methylethyl ester, (5z)-
isopropyl (5z,9alpha,11alpha,15r)-9,11,15-trihydroxy-17-phenyl-18,19,20-trinor-prost-5-en-1-oate;xalatan
latanoprost pf
latanoprost (ep monograph)
propan-2-yl (5z)-7-((1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-((3r)-3-hydroxy-5-phenylpentyl)cyclopentyl)hept-5-enoate
s01ee01
latanoprost (usp monograph)
dtxcid9021057
latanoprost (mart.)
latanoprost ophthalmic solution 0.005%
latanoprost (usp-rs)
EN300-21692769

Research Excerpts

Toxicity

Latanoprost is safe and equally effective to a fixed combination of dorzolamide and timolol in the treatment of uveitic glaucoma. The most significant ocular side effect was increased pigmentation of the iris observed in five and suspected in seven more latano-treated eyes.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The most significant ocular side effect was increased pigmentation of the iris observed in five and suspected in seven more latanoprost-treated eyes."( Effects on intraocular pressure and side effects of 0.005% latanoprost applied once daily, evening or morning. A comparison with timolol. Scandinavian Latanoprost Study Group.
Alm, A; Stjernschantz, J, 1995
)
0.29
" Monotherapy with xalathane is safe sufficiently effective, and comparable to combined therapy with timolol and pilocarpine."( [Xalathane: comparative assessment of efficacy and safety in hypotensive therapy of glaucoma].
Erichev, VP; Iakubova, LV,
)
0.13
" No differences were observed between treatments in visual acuity, anterior segment findings, or adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of timolol solution once daily vs timolol gel added to latanoprost.
Day, DG; Dubiner, HB; Holmes, KT; Sharpe, ED; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 1999
)
0.3
" The most frequently reported adverse ocular events were mild conjunctival hyperemia and iris pigmentation."( Efficacy and safety of latanoprost eye drops for glaucoma treatment: a 1-year study in Japan.
Araie, M; Azuma, I; Kitazawa, Y; Masuda, K; Mishima, HK; Suzuki, M,
)
0.13
" Patients who were treated for less than three months, who failed therapy due to ineffectiveness of the medicine or an adverse event also were included."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of latanoprost 0.005% compared to brimonidine 0.2% or dorzolamide 2% when added to a topical beta-adrenergic blocker in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Chopra, H; Day, DG; Holmes, KT; Kolker, AE; Konstas, AG; Lee, WH; Rieser, JC; Sharpe, ED; Stewart, WC, 2000
)
0.31
" The majority of adverse events during both treatments were judged as mild."( Efficacy and side effects of latanoprost monotherapy compared to adding dorzolamide to timolol in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension--a three-month randomised study. Spanish Latanoprost Study Group.
García Sanchez, J,
)
0.13
" Both treatment regimens were safe and well tolerated, with no significant between-group differences in reports of specific adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of bimatoprost in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 30-day comparison with latanoprost.
Cooke, D; Dirks, M; DuBiner, H; Felix, C; Stewart, WC; VanDenburgh, AM, 2001
)
0.31
"03% provided better diurnal IOP control than latanoprost and was safe and well tolerated in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma."( Efficacy and safety of bimatoprost in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 30-day comparison with latanoprost.
Cooke, D; Dirks, M; DuBiner, H; Felix, C; Stewart, WC; VanDenburgh, AM, 2001
)
0.31
" Safety and tolerability parameters included adverse events and quality-of-life measures (e."( Effectiveness and safety of brimonidine as adjunctive therapy for patients with elevated intraocular pressure in a large, open-label community trial.
Gornbein, JA; Lee, DA, 2001
)
0.31
" The most severe adverse effects were one case of corneal punctate erosion and one case of cystoid macular oedema in a pseudophakic patient."( Effect of 0.005% latanoprost once daily on intraocular pressure in glaucomatous patients not adequately controlled by beta-blockers twice daily: a 3-year follow-up. Experience and incidence of side effects in a prospective study on 76 patients.
Antinozzi, P; Costagliola, C; Del Prete, A; Fusco, R; Mastropasqua, L; Parmeggiani, F; Verolino, M, 2002
)
0.31
" The new formulation appears to be safe and does not demonstrate any more side effects than either of the components."( The efficacy and safety of unfixed and fixed combinations of latanoprost and other antiglaucoma medications.
Alm, A; Diestelhorst, M; Higginbotham, EJ; Pfeiffer, N; Rouland, JF, 2002
)
0.31
" Adverse events were recorded at each visit."( Efficacy and safety of the fixed combinations latanoprost/timolol versus dorzolamide/timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.
Feldman, RM; Sheu, WP; Shin, DH, 2004
)
0.32
" Intraocular pressures and adverse events were recorded."( A 5-year, multicenter, open-label, safety study of adjunctive latanoprost therapy for glaucoma.
Alm, A; McDermott, J; Schoenfelder, J, 2004
)
0.32
" Adverse event profiles were similar for patients with and without increased pigmentation."( A 5-year, multicenter, open-label, safety study of adjunctive latanoprost therapy for glaucoma.
Alm, A; McDermott, J; Schoenfelder, J, 2004
)
0.32
"Latanoprost therapy is safe and well tolerated for long-term treatment of open-angle glaucoma."( A 5-year, multicenter, open-label, safety study of adjunctive latanoprost therapy for glaucoma.
Alm, A; McDermott, J; Schoenfelder, J, 2004
)
0.32
" The most common reason to discontinue therapy was lack of efficacy (n = 70, 4%) and adverse event (n = 17, 1%)."( Short term efficacy and safety in glaucoma patients changed to the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination from monotherapies and adjunctive therapies.
Beausencourt, E; Hamacher, T; Jütte, M; Lorger, C; Maier, H; Neff, HM; Schinzel, M; Schlaffer, G; Scholz, R; Schölzel-Klatt, A; Stewart, WC, 2004
)
0.32
" Adverse events were recorded at each visit."( Concomitant administration of travoprost and brinzolamide versus fixed latanoprost/timolol combined therapy: three-month comparison of efficacy and safety.
Castillo, A; Fernandez-Vidal, A; Garcia-Feijoo, J; Garcia-Sanchez, J; Martinez-de-la-Casa, JM; Mendez-Hernandez, C, 2004
)
0.32
" The most common adverse event with latanoprost was ocular allergy (1."( Intraocular pressure, safety and quality of life in glaucoma patients switching to latanoprost from adjunctive and monotherapy treatments.
Fuchs, M; Haverkamp, F; Stewart, WC; Wuensch, S,
)
0.13
" The most common adverse event with LTFC was conjunctival hyperemia, which occurred in patients not previously treated with latanoprost therapy (N=16, 10%)."( Intraocular pressure and safety in glaucoma patients switching to latanoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination from mono- and adjunctive therapies.
Bányai, L; Blask, KD; Konstas, AG; Kozobolis, VP; Maloutas, S; Stewart, WC; Teus, MA; Trüb, PR; Tsironi, S; Väth, J, 2004
)
0.32
" There were no clinically significant ocular or systemic adverse effects."( Efficacy and safety of latanoprost for glaucoma treatment: a three-month multicentric study in India.
Baskaran, M; Parikh, R; Prasad, KK; Sekhar, GC; Sood, D; Sood, NN; Thomas, R; Vijaya, L, 2005
)
0.33
" The impact on cellular viability and apoptosis in the same cell line was evaluated, to address the possible proinflammatory and/or toxic origin of the most frequent clinical impairments induced by prostanoids (i."( In vitro study of inflammatory potential and toxicity profile of latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost in conjunctiva-derived epithelial cells.
Baudouin, C; Brignole-Baudouin, F; Guenoun, JM; Pauly, A; Rat, P; Warnet, JM, 2005
)
0.33
"TNFalpha induced or stimulated expression of the three inflammatory markers, whereas the PGF2alpha, latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost solutions did not induce an increase in these markers and even produced a marked reduction of ICAM-1 and PECAM-1 expression in those solutions most concentrated in BAC, thus suggesting a toxic phenomenon in cellular membranes induced by the preservative rather than the medication itself."( In vitro study of inflammatory potential and toxicity profile of latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost in conjunctiva-derived epithelial cells.
Baudouin, C; Brignole-Baudouin, F; Guenoun, JM; Pauly, A; Rat, P; Warnet, JM, 2005
)
0.33
" The most important adverse events for the prostaglandin derivatives were conjunctival hyperemia, eyelashes pigmentation and growth, iris pigmentation."( Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of latanoprost, travoprost and the fixed combination timolol-dorzolamide; a prospective, randomized, masked, cross-over design study.
Antohi, I; Chiseliţă, D; Danielescu, C; Medvichi, R, 2005
)
0.33
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
" Both volunteered and elicited reports of adverse events were collected; all patients who were randomized and received > or =1 dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis."( A 6-week, double-masked, parallel-group study of the efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% compared with latanoprost 0:005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Cunliffe, IA; Franks, WA; Renard, JP; Rojanapongpun, P, 2006
)
0.33
" Adverse events related to therapy were mild in nature, and there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 treatment groups."( A 6-week, double-masked, parallel-group study of the efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% compared with latanoprost 0:005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Cunliffe, IA; Franks, WA; Renard, JP; Rojanapongpun, P, 2006
)
0.33
" The purpose of the present work was to compare the stability, clinical efficacy, and adverse effect profile of this formulation with the innovator product."( Comparison of the stability, efficacy, and adverse effect profile of the innovator 0.005% latanoprost ophthalmic solution and a novel cyclodextrin-containing formulation.
Alarcon-Oceguera, F; Baiza-Duran, L; Beltran-Loustaunau, M; Castaneda-Hernandez, G; Cortez-Gastelum, M; Garcidueñas-Mejia, J; Gomez-Bastar, P; Gonzalez, JR; Jimenez-Roman, J; Korder-Ortega, V; Ortiz, M; Paczka-Zapata, J; Quintana-Hau, J; Tornero-Montaño, R; Torres-Segura, M; Velasco-Gallegos, G, 2007
)
0.34
" There was no significant difference in incidence of conjunctival hyperemia or any other adverse events in both the groups."( A randomized, crossover, open label pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xalatan in comparison with generic Latanoprost (Latoprost) in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Baskaran, M; Desai, C; George, R; Lingam, V; Narayanaswamy, A; Neog, A; Rajadhyaksha, V,
)
0.13
" Treatment-related adverse events were mild in both groups."( A 1-year study to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% to once-daily latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Andrew, R; Danesh-Meyer, H; Kozobolis, V; Melamed, S; Topouzis, F; Wells, AP; Wells, D; Wieland, H,
)
0.13
"5% fixed combination ophthalmic solution is an effective treatment for reducing IOP and it is safe and well-tolerated in patients with OAG or OH."( A 1-year study to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% to once-daily latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Andrew, R; Danesh-Meyer, H; Kozobolis, V; Melamed, S; Topouzis, F; Wells, AP; Wells, D; Wieland, H,
)
0.13
" Adverse effects were assessed and conjunctival hyperemia was graded using a standardized scale."( Efficacy and safety of a systematic switch from latanoprost to travoprost in patients with glaucoma.
Aung, T; Ho, CL; Hoh, ST; Istiantoro, VW; Kumar, RS; Oen, FT,
)
0.13
" There were 116 predominantly mild, nonserious adverse events attributed to the study drugs, reported by 86 (24."( Effectiveness and safety of dorzolamide-timolol alone or combined with latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Bastien, NR; Koulis, T; Lesk, MR; Sampalis, F; Sampalis, JS, 2008
)
0.35
"In patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and elevated IOP while on monotherapy with latanoprost, switching to dorzolamide-timolol or combining dorzolamide-timolol with latanoprost are effective and safe treatment options for reducing IOP and achieving therapeutic response."( Effectiveness and safety of dorzolamide-timolol alone or combined with latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Bastien, NR; Koulis, T; Lesk, MR; Sampalis, F; Sampalis, JS, 2008
)
0.35
" As systemic adverse events, there was one instance of malar flushing after brinzolamide addition and episodes of chest discomfort after timolol addition in 1 patient."( Comparison of ocular hypotensive effect and safety of brinzolamide and timolol added to latanoprost.
Ito, K; Matsunaga, K; Miura, K; Okawa, C; Sugimoto, K; Uji, Y,
)
0.13
"To investigate the incidence of latanoprost-related adverse events of the cornea, iris, and retina and the occurrence of hyperpigmentation."( A 5-year, randomized, open-label safety study of latanoprost and usual care in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Goldberg, I; Li, XY; Paggiarino, D; Selaru, P,
)
0.13
" Serious adverse drug reactions were reported in 17/3936 (0."( A 5-year, randomized, open-label safety study of latanoprost and usual care in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Goldberg, I; Li, XY; Paggiarino, D; Selaru, P,
)
0.13
"This 5-year study suggests that latanoprost as prescribed in 14 countries is a safe long-term treatment for patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension."( A 5-year, randomized, open-label safety study of latanoprost and usual care in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Goldberg, I; Li, XY; Paggiarino, D; Selaru, P,
)
0.13
" There was no statistical difference for any individual adverse event between treatments (p>0."( Comparison of daytime efficacy and safety of dorzolamide/timolol maleate fixed combination versus latanoprost.
Ahmad, A; Mulaney, J; Sonty, S; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC,
)
0.13
"Latanoprost is safe and equally effective to a fixed combination of dorzolamide and timolol in the treatment of uveitic glaucoma."( Efficacy and safety of latanoprost in eyes with uveitic glaucoma.
Chalkidou, S; Georgopoulos, G; Halkiadakis, I; Kostakou, A; Markomichelakis, NN; Papakonstantinou, D, 2009
)
0.35
"To document patient/physician perceptions of adverse effects and their relationship to medication changes among patients prescribed prostaglandin analogs."( The impact of ocular adverse effects in patients treated with topical prostaglandin analogs: changes in prescription patterns and patient persistence.
Gelb, L; Hahn, SR; Kim, EE; Tan, H; Zimmerman, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Frequency of adverse effects noted by physicians and associations with medication change decisions were examined in charted data."( The impact of ocular adverse effects in patients treated with topical prostaglandin analogs: changes in prescription patterns and patient persistence.
Gelb, L; Hahn, SR; Kim, EE; Tan, H; Zimmerman, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Adverse effects were the second most common reasons noted by physicians for switching medications after lack of efficacy (19% vs."( The impact of ocular adverse effects in patients treated with topical prostaglandin analogs: changes in prescription patterns and patient persistence.
Gelb, L; Hahn, SR; Kim, EE; Tan, H; Zimmerman, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
"Ocular adverse effects, particularly hyperemia, negatively affect patient continuation with therapy and switching."( The impact of ocular adverse effects in patients treated with topical prostaglandin analogs: changes in prescription patterns and patient persistence.
Gelb, L; Hahn, SR; Kim, EE; Tan, H; Zimmerman, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
" The cationic emulsion of latanoprost will most likely have fewer long-term adverse effects on the ocular surface than formulations containing toxic preservative BAC and may improve long-term tolerance over BAC-containing antiglaucomatous topical treatments."( Comparison of the ocular tolerability of a latanoprost cationic emulsion versus conventional formulations of prostaglandins: an in vivo toxicity assay.
Baudouin, C; Brignole-Baudouin, F; Faure, MO; Lambert, G; Liang, H, 2009
)
0.35
" Adverse events were recorded at each visit."( Efficacy and safety of fixed combinations of latanoprost/timolol and dorzolamide/timolol in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Grunden, JW; Kwok, K; Miglior, S, 2010
)
0.36
"Latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost are prostaglandin or prostamide-type ocular hypotensive medications, all of which are effective and safe for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP)."( Prostaglandin efficacy and safety study undertaken by race (the PRESSURE study).
Ahmed, II; Birt, CM; Buys, YM; Trope, GE, 2010
)
0.36
" Adverse events were recorded and ocular safety was evaluated."( Efficacy and safety of tafluprost 0.0015% versus latanoprost 0.005% eye drops in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: 24-month results of a randomized, double-masked phase III study.
Pillunat, LE; Ropo, A; Uusitalo, H, 2010
)
0.36
" Ocular and systemic adverse events were recorded."( Five-year, multicenter safety study of fixed-combination latanoprost/timolol (Xalacom) for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Alm, A; Grunden, JW; Kwok, KK,
)
0.13
"1% experienced a serious adverse event."( Five-year, multicenter safety study of fixed-combination latanoprost/timolol (Xalacom) for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Alm, A; Grunden, JW; Kwok, KK,
)
0.13
" The fixed combination is safe and well tolerated for long-term treatment in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension."( Five-year, multicenter safety study of fixed-combination latanoprost/timolol (Xalacom) for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Alm, A; Grunden, JW; Kwok, KK,
)
0.13
" Its goal was to compare the UNILAT generic product (latanoprost 50 microg/ml, eye drops solution, Unimed Pharma) with XALATAN original product (latanoprost 50 microg/ml, eye drops solution, Pfizer) and to prove that UNILAT is as effective and safe as original product."( [Clinical trial of the generic product UNILAT following its efficiency and safety in glaucoma and intraocular hypertension].
Jancus, V; Okkelová, J; Strmen, P; Tvrdonová, M, 2010
)
0.36
" Bimatoprost treatment was safe and well tolerated."( Efficacy and safety of switching from topical latanoprost to bimatoprost in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.
Baba, T; Fujimura, T; Hirooka, K; Mizote, M; Sato, S; Shiraga, F; Tenkumo, K; Ueda, H, 2011
)
0.37
" Ocular symptoms and adverse events were monitored."( A 4-week, dose-ranging study comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of latanoprost 75, 100 and 125 μg/mL to latanoprost 50 μg/mL (xalatan) in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Eveleth, D; Starita, C; Tressler, C, 2012
)
0.38
" Conjunctival hyperemia, the most commonly reported adverse event, occurred in 16."( A 4-week, dose-ranging study comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of latanoprost 75, 100 and 125 μg/mL to latanoprost 50 μg/mL (xalatan) in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Eveleth, D; Starita, C; Tressler, C, 2012
)
0.38
" The gastro-intestinal effects are among the most reported adverse effects upon topical application of PGAs."( Possible mechanism for the gastro-intestinal adverse effects upon topical application of Prostaglandin F₂α analogs.
Cai, S; Li, X; Liu, X; Yan, N; Zhou, X, 2013
)
0.39
" The most frequent ocular adverse event, drug intolerance, was reported in 1 (0."( Efficacy and safety of preservative-free latanoprost eyedrops, compared with BAK-preserved latanoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma.
Baudouin, C; Delval, L; Fekih, LE; Renault, D; Rouland, JF; Stalmans, I; Traverso, CE, 2013
)
0.39
" Adverse reactions associated with latanoprost were mainly ocular in nature."( Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Latanoprost Monotherapy in Patients With Angle-closure Glaucoma.
Chen, R; Ong, ML; Wang, NL; Yang, K; Zhan, SY; Zheng, Z, 2016
)
0.43
"Both LT and TT are safe and effective for the treatment of OHT associated with uveitis and greater IOP reduction may be achieved by TT than by LT treatment."( Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Latanoprost/Timolol versus Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combinations for Ocular Hypertension Associated with Uveitis.
Kanda, T; Mine, I; Sakurai, Y; Shibata, M; Taguchi, M; Takeuchi, M, 2017
)
0.46
"Uveitis due to brimonidine is a rare adverse effect, but it must be known."( Hypertensive acute granulomatous anterior uveitis as a side effect of topical brimonidine.
Arciniegas-Perasso, CA; Clemente-Tomás, R; Duch-Samper, AM; García-Ibor, F; Hervás-Hernandis, JM; Ruiz-Del Río, N, 2018
)
0.48
" Adverse reactions and dropouts were recorded."( Short-term Efficacy and Safety of a Latanoprost/Carteolol Fixed Combination Switched From Concomitant Therapy to in Patients With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension.
Inoue, K; Ishida, K; Iwasa, M; Shiokawa, M; Tomita, G, 2018
)
0.48
", tafluprost/timolol (TAF/TIM) and latanoprost/carteolol (LAT/CAR), by determining their effects on intraocular pressure (IOP) in ocular normotensive monkeys and examining their toxic effects on ocular surface using human corneal epithelial cells."( Efficacy and safety of the fixed combinations of tafluprost/timolol and latanoprost/carteolol.
Akaishi, T; Fuwa, M; Kato, M; Mieda, M; Shimazaki, A; Taniguchi, T; Yamashita, N, 2019
)
0.51
" All treatments had some common adverse ocular effects."( Comparative evaluation of Latanoprostene Bunod, Timolol Maleate, and latanoprost Ophthalmic Solutions to assess their safety and efficacy in lowering intraocular pressure for the management of Open-Angle Glaucoma.
Liao, Y; Nie, X; Wang, Y, 2020
)
0.56
" Topical latanoprost added to therapeutic efficacy of topical betamethason and minoxidil in treating patchy AA, suggesting it being beneficial and safe adjuvant therapy and add to efficacy of topical treatments without any adverse effects."( Comparison of efficacy, safety and satisfaction of latanoprost versus minoxidil, betamethasone and in combination in patients with alopecia areata: A blinded multiple group randomized controlled trial.
Behrangi, E; Ghassemi, M; Goodarzi, A; Jafari, M; Yazdanian, N, 2022
)
0.72
" A major challenge in the treatment is the occurrence of adverse events and poor adherence."( The use of benzalkonium chloride in topical glaucoma treatment: An investigation of the efficacy and safety of benzalkonium chloride-preserved intraocular pressure-lowering eye drops and their effect on conjunctival goblet cells.
Nagstrup, AH, 2023
)
0.91

Pharmacokinetics

Currently available latanoprost solutions with different preservatives showed sufficient intraocular concentration to activate the FP receptor. Different pharmacokinetic profiles of absorption or elimination.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The elimination half-life of the acid of latanoprost was estimated to be 13."( Pharmacokinetics of latanoprost in the cynomolgus monkey. 2nd communication: repeated topical administration on the eye.
Byding, P; Sjöquist, B; Stjernschantz, J; Uhlin, A, 1999
)
0.3
" The half-life of latanoprost acid in the aqueous humor was 2-3 hours."( Ocular and systemic pharmacokinetics of latanoprost in humans.
Sjöquist, B; Stjernschantz, J, 2002
)
0.31
"Currently available latanoprost solutions with different preservatives showed sufficient intraocular concentration to activate the FP receptor, but different pharmacokinetic profiles of absorption or elimination."( Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Intraocular Penetration of Latanoprost Solutions with Different Preservatives in Human Eyes.
Aihara, M; Hara, T; Hisaka, A; Honjo, M; Okubo, M; Satake, S; Sekine, Y; Shimada, M, 2018
)
0.48

Compound-Compound Interactions

Nimodipine combined with latanoprost eye drops is effective in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. The combination could effectively improve the ocular hemodynamics and visual field defects.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Once-daily latanoprost treatment provides uniform circadian (around-the-clock) IOP reduction by itself, or in combination with timolol."( Around-the-clock intraocular pressure reduction with once-daily application of latanoprost by itself or in combination with timolol.
Bito, LZ; Gaygi, Z; Nagy, ZT; Rácz, P; Ruzsonyi, MR, 1996
)
0.29
"5% alone or combined with latanoprost in reducing IOP in a real-world setting."( Effectiveness and safety of dorzolamide-timolol alone or combined with latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Bastien, NR; Koulis, T; Lesk, MR; Sampalis, F; Sampalis, JS, 2008
)
0.35
" However, no studies have evaluated ripasudil combined with β-blockers and prostaglandin analogues."( Additive Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Effects of the Rho Kinase Inhibitor Ripasudil (K-115) Combined With Timolol or Latanoprost: A Report of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.
Abe, H; Araie, M; Inoue, T; Kuwayama, Y; Suganami, H; Tanihara, H; Yamamoto, T, 2015
)
0.42
"These clinical trials found additive IOP-lowering effects of ripasudil from placebo at trough and peak levels in combination with timolol and at peak level in combination with latanoprost."( Additive Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Effects of the Rho Kinase Inhibitor Ripasudil (K-115) Combined With Timolol or Latanoprost: A Report of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.
Abe, H; Araie, M; Inoue, T; Kuwayama, Y; Suganami, H; Tanihara, H; Yamamoto, T, 2015
)
0.42
"To examine the relevance of concentration of benzalkonium chloride (BAK) on the cornea, we investigated the effects of latanoprost containing BAK alone and in combination with other antiglaucoma drug classes on corneal epithelium in vitro in a cultured rabbit corneal cell line (SIRC) and in vivo, using a corneal resistance device (CRD)."( In vitro and in vivo corneal effects of latanoprost combined with brimonidine, timolol, dorzolamide, or brinzolamide.
Fukuda, M; Sasaki, H; Shibata, N; Shibata, S; Shibata, T; Sugiyama, K; Takeda, N, 2016
)
0.43
" In this pilot (24 patients) left-right comparative study we addressed efficiency of prostaglandin F2α analogue latanoprost versus tacrolimus when combined with narrow-band ultraviolet B and microneedling in repigmentation of nonsegmental vitiligo lesions."( A pilot comparative study of topical latanoprost and tacrolimus in combination with narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy and microneedling for the treatment of nonsegmental vitiligo.
Korobko, IV; Lomonosov, KM, 2016
)
0.43
" This study was designed to assess the therapeutic efficacy of microneedling in combination with NB-UVB phototherapy versus their combination with latanoprost in vitiligo."( A comparative study of combined microneedling and narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy versus their combination with topical latanoprost in the treatment of vitiligo.
Doghaim, NN; Ghaly, NR; Lotfy, SS; Neinaa, YME, 2021
)
0.62
"To explore the curative effect of nimodipine combined with latanoprost in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and its effect on ocular hemodynamics and visual field defects."( Efficacy of Nimodipine Combined with Latanoprost in Treating Open-Angle Glaucoma and Its Influence on Ocular Hemodynamics and Visual Field Defects.
Duan, HP; Liu, R, 2022
)
0.72
" According to different treatment plans, the patients were divided into two groups: an observation group (n = 46) treated with nimodipine combined with latanoprost, and a control group (n = 41) treated by latanoprost monotherapy."( Efficacy of Nimodipine Combined with Latanoprost in Treating Open-Angle Glaucoma and Its Influence on Ocular Hemodynamics and Visual Field Defects.
Duan, HP; Liu, R, 2022
)
0.72
"Nimodipine combined with latanoprost eye drops is effective in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma, which could effectively improve the ocular hemodynamics and visual field defects of patients with fewer adverse reactions and higher safety."( Efficacy of Nimodipine Combined with Latanoprost in Treating Open-Angle Glaucoma and Its Influence on Ocular Hemodynamics and Visual Field Defects.
Duan, HP; Liu, R, 2022
)
0.72

Bioavailability

Latanoprost (13,14-dihydro-15(R)-17-phenyl-18,19,20-trinor-PGF2a isopropyl ester, CAS 130209-82-4 PhXA41, Xalatan) is an antiglaucoma prodrug which enhances the bioavailability of the drug.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Latanoprost (13,14-dihydro-15(R)-17-phenyl-18,19,20-trinor-PGF2a isopropyl ester, CAS 130209-82-4 PhXA41, Xalatan) is an antiglaucoma prodrug which enhances the bioavailability of the drug into the eye compared to the corresponding acid."( Pharmacokinetics of latanoprost in the cynomolgus monkey. 2nd communication: repeated topical administration on the eye.
Byding, P; Sjöquist, B; Stjernschantz, J; Uhlin, A, 1999
)
0.3
" The absorption rate of latanoprost and timolol into the aqueous humor was similar after administration of the FC compared to the two drugs given separately."( Bioavailability in the human eye of a fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol compared to monotherapy.
Calissendorff, B; Grunge-Lowerud, A; Högberg, G; Sjöquist, B, 2002
)
0.31
" These findings may be valuable in developing formulation strategies to optimize ocular bioavailability of topically administered ocular agents."( Expression of multidrug resistance associated protein 5 (MRP5) on cornea and its role in drug efflux.
Herndon, BL; Karla, PK; Mitra, A; Pal, D; Quinn, TL; Thomas, P, 2009
)
0.35
"The differences in permeability and bioavailability between the 3 ophthalmic latanoprost formulations are attributable to the differences in their composition."( Does preservative content affect drug permeability? The permeability analysis in vitro of 3 ophthalmic Latanoprost formulations in a human epithelial cell culture model.
Antonik, J; Cisek, A; Romaniuk, D; Romaniuk, W; Smagur, J,
)
0.13
"2-fold) and bioavailability (2."( Co-delivery of latanoprost and timolol from micelles-laden contact lenses for the treatment of glaucoma.
Bu, R; Feng, S; Ge, Y; Gou, J; He, H; Tang, X; Wang, J; Xu, J; Yin, T; Zhang, A; Zhang, Y, 2019
)
0.51
"Anti-glaucoma latanoprost-loaded ocular implants provide prolonged delivery and enhanced bioavailability relative to the conventional eye drops."( Latanoprost Quantification in Ocular Implants and Tissues: HPLC-Fluorescence vs HPLC-UV.
Jirjees, F; Jones, D; Sheshala, R; Singh, TRR; Soliman, K; Sonawane, R; Wang, Y, 2021
)
0.62

Dosage Studied

New anti-glaucoma drugs, latanoprost and nipradilol, have been shown to effect a reduction in IOP equal to that achieved with the equivalent dosage of timolol. This prospective study included 59 NTG and 20 POAG patients.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Dosing once daily was at least as effective as twice daily."( Intraocular pressure-reducing effect of PhXA41 in ocular hypertension. Comparison of dose regimens.
Hitchings, RA; Nagasubramanian, S; Sheth, GP; Stjernschantz, J, 1993
)
0.29
"To establish the dose-response relationship for the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) and side effects during long-term treatment of patients with ocular hypertension with the prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2 alpha) analog PhXA41."( Intraocular pressure-reducing effect of PhXA41 in patients with increased eye pressure. A one-month study.
Airaksinen, J; Alm, A; Mandahl, A; Marsk, A; Resul, B; Stjernschantz, J; Törnquist, P; Tuulonen, A; Villumsen, J, 1993
)
0.29
"The three concentrations of PhXA41 reduced the average IOP between 31% and 38% during the second day of treatment, with only a weak dose-response relationship."( Intraocular pressure-reducing effect of PhXA41 in patients with increased eye pressure. A one-month study.
Airaksinen, J; Alm, A; Mandahl, A; Marsk, A; Resul, B; Stjernschantz, J; Törnquist, P; Tuulonen, A; Villumsen, J, 1993
)
0.29
" The IOP-lowering effect of latanoprost lasts for 20 to 24 hours after a single dose, which allows a single daily dosage regimen."( Latanoprost. A review of its pharmacological properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability in the management of primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Patel, SS; Spencer, CM, 1996
)
0.29
" New anti-glaucoma drugs, latanoprost and nipradilol, have been shown to effect a reduction in IOP equal to that achieved with the equivalent dosage of timolol, with no adverse systemic side effects."( [Current topics in glaucoma].
Masuda, K, 1996
)
0.29
"005%, once-a-day dosing of latanoprost is highly effective in significantly reducing intraocular pressure, causing only minimal, clinically acceptable short-term ocular side effects."( Clinical dose-regimen studies with latanoprost, a new ocular hypotensive PGF2 alpha analogue.
Diestelhorst, M; Krieglstein, GK; Lusky, M; Nagasubramanian, S, 1997
)
0.3
" Outflow facility was measured in six normal monkeys 3 hours prior to dosing and 1 hour after unilateral dosing with either drug."( A comparative study of latanoprost (Xalatan) and isopropyl unoprostone (Rescula) in normal and glaucomatous monkey eyes.
Kitazawa, Y; Podos, SM; Serle, JB; Wang, RF,
)
0.13
"It is known that twice daily dosing of latanoprost is less effective in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) than once daily applications."( Latanoprost twice daily is less effective than once daily: indication of receptor subsensitivity?
Alm, A; Lindén, C, 1998
)
0.3
"The results of the present study are compatible with development of subsensitivity, at the level of the FP-receptor or its associated intracellular signaling pathways, with twice- but not with once-daily dosing of latanoprost."( Latanoprost twice daily is less effective than once daily: indication of receptor subsensitivity?
Alm, A; Lindén, C, 1998
)
0.3
"To study any interaction between pilocarpine and latanoprost when administered together, and to determine the optimal timing of dosage to maximize reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP)."( Interaction of pilocarpine with latanoprost in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Crosson, CE; Hebert, RL; Kent, AR; Thomas, TJ; Vroman, DT, 1999
)
0.3
" There were no significant differences between dosage schedules in the magnitude of the additional reduction in IOP."( Interaction of pilocarpine with latanoprost in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Crosson, CE; Hebert, RL; Kent, AR; Thomas, TJ; Vroman, DT, 1999
)
0.3
"To compare the 24-hour diurnal ocular hypotensive efficacy of two dosing regimens of latanoprost, once daily (8 AM or 10 PM), vs timolol maleate, twice daily."( Comparison of 24-hour intraocular pressure reduction with two dosing regimens of latanoprost and timolol maleate in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Gandi, S; Hudgins, AC; Konstas, AG; Maltezos, AC; Stewart, WC, 1999
)
0.3
"005% given at 8 AM or 10 PM for 1 month and then changed to the other dosing regimen for 1 month."( Comparison of 24-hour intraocular pressure reduction with two dosing regimens of latanoprost and timolol maleate in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Gandi, S; Hudgins, AC; Konstas, AG; Maltezos, AC; Stewart, WC, 1999
)
0.3
" When dosed according to labeling, latanoprost had the lowest cost of therapy at $0."( Daily cost of newer glaucoma agents.
Hudgins, AC; Pruitt, CA; Sine, C; Stewart, WC, 1999
)
0.3
" The peak level 2 hours after dosing for timolol hemihydate was 16."( Efficacy and safety of timolol solution once daily vs timolol gel added to latanoprost.
Day, DG; Dubiner, HB; Holmes, KT; Sharpe, ED; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 1999
)
0.3
" Recommended dosing is once daily at bedtime."( Prostaglandin analogs in the treatment of glaucoma.
Camras, CB; Hejkal, TW, 1999
)
0.3
" The once daily dosing promotes compliance."( Therapeutic potential of prostaglandin analogues in glaucoma.
Lindén, C, 2001
)
0.31
" This prospective study included 59 NTG and 20 POAG patients treated with the following four dosing regimens of latanoprost: patients on no previous medication received latanoprost as initial therapy (Group 1, n=31), patients on beta-blocker therapy received latanoprost as adjunctive therapy (Group II, n=9), patients on unoprostone monotherapy were switched to latanoprost monotherapy (Group III, n=14), and patients previously on dual therapy with isopropyl unoprostone and beta-blocker were switched to a combined treatment of latanoprost and beta-blocker (Group IV, n=25)."( Intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of latanoprost in patients with normal-tension glaucoma or primary open-angle glaucoma.
Kitazawa, Y; Murase, H; Tamada, Y; Taniguchi, T; Yamamoto, T, 2001
)
0.31
"This study suggests latanoprost dosed daily in the evening statistically reduces intraocular pressure more during daytime and evening hours than brimonidine dosed twice daily."( The efficacy and safety of latanoprost 0.005% once daily versus brimonidine 0.2% twice daily in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Day, DG; Latham, KE; Schuhr, J; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 2001
)
0.31
"Although IOP was reduced with every 24-hour dosing of latanoprost, the frequency of prostaglandin-induced adverse events was high."( Effects of topical administration of 0.005% latanoprost solution on eyes of clinically normal horses.
Diehl, KA; Hoshaw-Woodard, S; Kobayashi, I; Schmall, LM; Vitucci, MP; Willis, AM, 2001
)
0.31
" The reduction in IOP was maintained throughout the 24-hour dosage interval."( Topical bimatoprost: a review of its use in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Easthope, SE; Perry, CM, 2002
)
0.31
"1 mm Hg) dosed latanoprost/timolol maleate compared with timolol maleate given twice daily (21."( A comparison of once-daily morning vs evening dosing of concomitant latanoprost/timolol.
Konstas, AG; Lallos, NA; Leech, JN; Nakos, E; Stewart, WC; Tersis, I, 2002
)
0.31
"Rates of medication discontinuation reflect factors including effectiveness, tolerability, cost, and dosing frequency."( Discontinuation rates of topical glaucoma medications in a managed care population.
Cho, J; Mullins, CD; Shaya, FT; Wong, W, 2002
)
0.31
"3%) mainly because of its once daily dosing (P < 0001)."( The efficacy and safety of the timolol/dorzolamide fixed combination vs latanoprost in exfoliation glaucoma.
Konstas, AG; Kozobolis, VP; Leech, J; Stewart, WC; Tersis, I, 2003
)
0.32
"We evaluated conjunctival hyperemia by a standard photographic measure at the slit lamp and by anterior segment photographs in healthy subjects after dosing for 5 days with latanoprost, bimatoprost, or travoprost."( Conjunctival hyperemia in healthy subjects after short-term dosing with latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost.
Jackson, AL; Kolker, AE; Leech, J; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 2003
)
0.32
"005% lasts for up to 24 hours after a single topical dose, which allows for a once-daily dosage regimen."( Latanoprost : an update of its use in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Culy, CR; Ibbotson, T; McGavin, JK; Perry, CM, 2003
)
0.32
" This may occur, despite a significant reduction in IOP, because the reached IOP is not sufficient enough to avoid further deterioration because the patient's work or social activities do not allow a correct daily dosage of the compound (bad compliance); or as a result of treatment suspension, because of the development of systemic and/or local side effects."( Assessing the cost-effectiveness of switching from a beta-blocker to latanoprost in the treatment of ocular hypertension.
Costagliola, C; Parmeggiani, F; Sebastiani, A, 2003
)
0.32
"A single centered, active-controlled, three-period crossover comparison that evaluated conjunctival and corneal punctate staining, by grade and individual stains, in healthy subjects after dosing for five days in one eye with latanoprost, bimatoprost, or travoprost."( Corneal punctate staining with latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost in healthy subjects.
Jackson, AL; Jenkins, JN; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 2003
)
0.32
"33) or at 1 hour after dosing (latanoprost 23."( Corneal punctate staining with latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost in healthy subjects.
Jackson, AL; Jenkins, JN; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 2003
)
0.32
" These agents are typically dosed once daily."( Comparison of the diurnal ocular hypotensive efficacy of travoprost and latanoprost over a 44-hour period in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.
Andrew, RM; Bergamini, MV; Darell Turner, F; Dubiner, HB; Landry, T; Przydryga, J; Robertson, S; Silver, LH; Sircy, MD; Weiner, A, 2004
)
0.32
" Due to the unique mechanism of action of latanoprost, once-daily dosing of one drop of FC latanoprost/timolol results in additional IOP reduction compared with either drug administered separately."( An evaluation of the fixed-combination of latanoprost and timolol for use in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Feldman, RM, 2004
)
0.32
"Fixed combination latanoprost/timolol administered once daily is both more effective and better tolerated than twice daily dosing with UFC brimonidine/timolol."( A comparison of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol with the unfixed combination of brimonidine and timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. A six month, evaluator masked, multicentre study in Europe.
Cunliffe, I; García-Sánchez, J; Landry, J; Pajic, B; Rouland, JF; Spiegel, D; Traverso, C, 2004
)
0.32
" The following 5 different dosing protocols were studied: latanoprost with bimatoprost added, bimatoprost with latanoprost added, latanoprost with travoprost added, travoprost with latanoprost added, and latanoprost with a second dose of latanoprost added."( Additivity of bimatoprost or travoprost to latanoprost in glaucomatous monkey eyes.
Gagliuso, DJ; Mittag, TW; Podos, SM; Wang, RF, 2004
)
0.32
"005% dosed once in the evening."( A comparison of the effects of dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost on intraocular pressure and pulsatile ocular blood flow in primary open-angle glaucoma patients.
Harris, A; Janulevicienë, I; Kagemann, L; McCranor, L; Siesky, B, 2004
)
0.32
"In previous analyses of primary efficacy data from two randomized clinical trials, standard dosing regimens of the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (COSOPT) and latanoprost (XALATAN) were shown to have equivalent efficacy with regard to reduction in mean daytime diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP)."( Efficacy of the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in the treatment of ocular hypertension or glaucoma: combined analysis of pooled data from two large randomized observer and patient-masked studies.
Adamsons, IA; Fechtner, RD; Lines, CR; McCarroll, KA, 2005
)
0.33
"A prospective, observer-masked, crossover, active-controlled, randomized comparison in which after a 6-week medicine-free period, patients were randomized to either latanoprost-timolol-fixed combination therapy or latanoprost therapy, both dosed once each evening, alone for 8 weeks."( Twenty-four-hour control with latanoprost-timolol-fixed combination therapy vs latanoprost therapy.
Boboridis, K; Jenkins, JN; Kallinderis, K; Konstas, AG; Stewart, WC; Tzetzi, D, 2005
)
0.33
"005% (Xalatan) dosed once daily in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension."( Circadian IOP-lowering efficacy of travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution compared to latanoprost 0.005%.
Castillo, A; Fernández-Vidal, A; García-Feijoo, J; García-Sánchez, J; Martínez-de-la-Casa, JM; Méndez, C, 2006
)
0.33
"After a medicine-free period, qualified patients were randomized to either placebo dosed in the morning with a latanoprost-timolol fixed combination dosed in the evening or timolol alone dosed twice daily for 8 weeks."( 24-Hour control with a latanoprost-timolol fixed combination vs timolol alone.
Economou, AI; Jenkins, JN; Kaltsos, K; Konstas, AG; Lake, S; Stewart, WC, 2006
)
0.33
" A second group of animals was exposed to the medications through a dosing regimen of 1 drop/min (lpar3 drops total) (n=4/group)."( Assessment of corneal epithelial integrity after acute exposure to ocular hypotensive agents preserved with and without benzalkonium chloride.
Cavanagh, HD; Lakshman, N; Petroll, WM; Whitson, JT,
)
0.13
"5% ophthalmic solution (Lat/Tim), dosed once daily in the morning, in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OH)."( A 1-year study to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% to once-daily latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Andrew, R; Danesh-Meyer, H; Kozobolis, V; Melamed, S; Topouzis, F; Wells, AP; Wells, D; Wieland, H,
)
0.13
"Both morning and evening dosing of LTFC were effective in lowering diurnal IOP in patients with POAG."( Comparison of intraocular pressure lowering effect of once daily morning vs evening dosing of latanoprost/timolol maleate combination.
Aşik, S; Can, I; Gurdal, C; Kürkçüoğlu, P; Takmaz, T,
)
0.13
"Once-daily dosing of travoprost with sofZia produced significantly fewer corneal changes and less conjunctival inflammation than latanoprost preserved with BAK."( Comparison of corneal and conjunctival changes after dosing of travoprost preserved with sofZia, latanoprost with 0.02% benzalkonium chloride, and preservative-free artificial tears.
Kahook, MY; Noecker, RJ, 2008
)
0.35
" dosing of dorzolamide."( Comparison of twice-daily and three-times-daily dosing of dorzolamide in ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma patients treated with latanoprost.
Evans, D; Fung, KH; Lupinacci, AP; Netland, PA; Zhao, Y, 2008
)
0.35
"00) dosing of dorzolamide, treated in both eyes for 4 weeks, washed out for 3 weeks, then switched to the opposite dosing frequency for 4 weeks."( Comparison of twice-daily and three-times-daily dosing of dorzolamide in ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma patients treated with latanoprost.
Evans, D; Fung, KH; Lupinacci, AP; Netland, PA; Zhao, Y, 2008
)
0.35
" dosing of dorzolamide did not significantly affect a change in IOP except at one afternoon time point."( Comparison of twice-daily and three-times-daily dosing of dorzolamide in ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma patients treated with latanoprost.
Evans, D; Fung, KH; Lupinacci, AP; Netland, PA; Zhao, Y, 2008
)
0.35
"To compare the 12-hour efficacy and safety of dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC) dosed twice daily versus latanoprost dosed every evening following a timolol run-in in primary open-angle glaucoma patients."( Comparison of daytime efficacy and safety of dorzolamide/timolol maleate fixed combination versus latanoprost.
Ahmad, A; Mulaney, J; Sonty, S; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC,
)
0.13
" Patients with an IOP of 22-29 mmHg inclusive at 8 AMwere randomized to either bimatoprost dosed each evening or DTFC twice-daily."( A comparison of dorzolamide/timolol-fixed combination versus bimatoprost in patients with open-angle glaucoma who are poorly controlled on latanoprost.
Nelson, LA; Sharpe, ED; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC; Williams, RD, 2008
)
0.35
" Patient dosing preference (a."( Comparison of morning versus evening dosing and 24-h post-dose efficacy of travoprost compared with latanoprost in patients with open-angle glaucoma .
Battista, RA; Haidich, AB; Konstas, AG; Yan, DB, 2008
)
0.35
"The mean IOP in the first period when all patients were dosed in the evening was assessed 12 h after dosing at 09:00 and it was similar in the two treatment groups (mean ± standard deviation: 17."( Comparison of morning versus evening dosing and 24-h post-dose efficacy of travoprost compared with latanoprost in patients with open-angle glaucoma .
Battista, RA; Haidich, AB; Konstas, AG; Yan, DB, 2008
)
0.35
"Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension with normal blood pressure were randomized to LTFC, dosed each evening, or timolol dosed twice daily in a cross-over design for 8 weeks and the opposite medicine for 8 weeks."( 24-hour intraocular pressure and blood pressure levels with latanoprost/timolol fixed combination versus timolol.
Konstas, AG; Kozobolis, VP; Lasaridis, AN; Mikropoulos, D; Nelson, LA; Pikilidou, MI; Sarafidis, PA; Stewart, WC; Tsironi, S, 2009
)
0.35
" This model-based meta-analysis validates previous findings that evening dosing is superior to morning dosing and predicts the optimal time for dosing, based on the quantitative assessment of baseline and latanoprost-treated 24-h circadian intraocular pressure (IOP) curves."( A model-based meta-analysis of the effect of latanoprost chronotherapy on the circadian intraocular pressure of patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Luu, KT; Nickens, DJ; Raber, SR; Vicini, P, 2010
)
0.36
"After up to a 6-week medicine-free period, XFG patients were randomized to either TTFC or LTFC for 3 months, dosed each evening, and then changed to the opposite treatment for another 3 months."( 24-h Intraocular pressure control with evening-dosed travoprost/timolol, compared with latanoprost/timolol, fixed combinations in exfoliative glaucoma.
Dimopoulos, AT; Embeslidis, TA; Haidich, AB; Konstas, AG; Mikropoulos, DG; Papanastasiou, A; Stewart, WC, 2010
)
0.36
"2%) and desire to simplify treatment with once-daily dosing (29."( Long-term effect of latanoprost/timolol fixed combination in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a prospective, observational, noninterventional study.
Guzy, C; Heckmann, B; Miller, PJ; Schwenn, O, 2010
)
0.36
" The potential benefit to the human ocular surface with oncedaily dosing needs to be evaluated clinically."( Polyquad-preserved travoprost/timolol, benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved travoprost/timolol, and latanoprost/timolol in fixed combinations: a rabbit ocular surface study.
Baudouin, C; Brignole-Baudouin, F; Liang, H; Pauly, A; Riancho, L, 2011
)
0.37
"This 8-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, noninferiority study compared once-daily evening dosing of LTFC with the unfixed combination of latanoprost, one drop in the evening, and timolol, one drop in the morning (LTuFC)."( Comparative efficacy and safety of the fixed versus unfixed combination of latanoprost and timolol in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Ge, J; Li, XX; Li, YM; Sheng, YH; Sun, NX; Sun, XH; Yao, K; Zhao, JL; Zhong, Z, 2011
)
0.37
"UBM revealed cyclodialysis in the patient's affected eye after a single dosage of bimatoprost."( A case hypersensitive to bimatoprost and dexamethasone.
Li, X; Liu, G; Liu, X; Wang, Y; Xiang, H; Yu, W, 2011
)
0.37
" Each participant underwent aqueous humor dynamics measurements at baseline and at 2 weeks of dosing in random order with latanoprost in the evening and placebo in the morning, timolol maleate twice daily, and dorzolamide hydrochloride twice daily."( Diurnal and nocturnal variations in aqueous humor dynamics of patients with ocular hypertension undergoing medical therapy.
Fan, S; Gangahar, C; Gulati, V; Maslonka, MA; Toris, CB; Zhao, M, 2012
)
0.38
"005% (n = 75, dosed in the evening, with vehicle control in the morning to maintain masking) for 12 weeks."( Fixed-combination brimonidine-timolol versus latanoprost in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a 12-week, randomized, comparison study.
Cottingham, AJ; Hollander, DA; Katz, LJ; Rauchman, SH; Schiffman, RM; Simmons, ST; Williams, JM, 2012
)
0.38
" After 1 month, eyes were crossed over to the opposite dosing regimen for another month."( Intraocular pressure-lowering effect of 0.005% latanoprost with two different dosing regimens.
Naghibi, A; Nilforushan, N; Nouri-Mahdavi, K; Shokrollahi, S; Soltan Sanjari, M, 2012
)
0.38
" Since the lack of compliance with topical ocular dosing may compromise efficacy, alternate methods of delivery are being sought."( Safety assessment of subconjunctivally implanted devices containing latanoprost in Dutch-belted rabbits.
Evans, M; Guo, H; Jessen, BA; Kaur, H; Leedle, R; Miller, P; Shiue, MH,
)
0.13
" Multiday dosing (daily for 3 days) of latanoprost also was evaluated."( Prostaglandin analog effects on cerebrospinal fluid reabsorption via nasal mucosa.
Pedler, MG; Petrash, JM; Subramanian, PS, 2021
)
0.62
" Razuprotafib QD dosing did not demonstrate additional IOP lowering compared to latanoprost alone."( Tie2 Activation via VE-PTP Inhibition With Razuprotafib as an Adjunct to Latanoprost in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension.
Brigell, M; Buch, A; Peters, KG; Withers, B, 2022
)
0.72
"The purpose of this study was to compare varying concentrations of NCX 470 (a nitric oxide-donating bimatoprost) to latanoprost in a dose-response safety and efficacy trial."( A Randomized, Controlled Comparison of NCX 470 (0.021%, 0.042%, and 0.065%) and Latanoprost 0.005% in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: The Dolomites Study.
Boyer, JL; Duquesroix, B; Fechtner, RD; Kothe, AC; Lopez, K; Navratil, T; Usner, DW; Walters, TR, 2022
)
0.72
" This would be achieved with a once daily dosing regimen to preserve glaucoma patients' vision, ocular surface, and quality-of-life and wellness."( Use of a Cationic Emulsion of Latanoprost to Treat Glaucoma Patients with Ocular Surface Disease: A Preclinical Review.
Baudouin, C; Daull, P; Garrigue, JS; Liang, H, 2023
)
0.91
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (4)

RoleDescription
antiglaucoma drugAny drug which can be used to prevent or alleviate glaucoma, a disease in which the optic nerve is damaged, resulting in progressive, irreversible loss of vision. It is often, though not always, associated with increased pressure of the fluid in the eye.
antihypertensive agentAny drug used in the treatment of acute or chronic vascular hypertension regardless of pharmacological mechanism.
EC 4.2.1.1 (carbonic anhydrase) inhibitorAn EC 4.2.1.* (hydro-lyases) inhibitor that interferes with the action of carbonic anhydrase (EC 4.2.1.1). Such compounds reduce the secretion of H(+) ions by the proximal kidney tubule.
prodrugA compound that, on administration, must undergo chemical conversion by metabolic processes before becoming the pharmacologically active drug for which it is a prodrug.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (3)

ClassDescription
prostaglandins Falpha
triolA chemical compound containing three hydroxy groups.
isopropyl esterAny carboxylic ester resulting from the formal condensation of a carboxylic acid with the hydroxy group of propan-2-ol.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (10)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, Beta-lactamaseEscherichia coli K-12Potency11.22020.044717.8581100.0000AID485341
Chain A, 2-oxoglutarate OxygenaseHomo sapiens (human)Potency25.11890.177814.390939.8107AID2147
Microtubule-associated protein tauHomo sapiens (human)Potency5.01190.180013.557439.8107AID1460
beta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency35.48130.00586.026332.6427AID492947
mitogen-activated protein kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency12.58930.039816.784239.8107AID1454
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)12.90000.11007.190310.0000AID1473738
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1Homo sapiens (human)Ki10.00000.02300.07000.1490AID679659
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (43)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
lipid transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (26)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
lipid transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (18)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
lysosomeSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (41)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID126796Maximum reduction of the intraocular pressure in normotensive monkeys after topical administration of 3 ug of the compound1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-22, Volume: 36, Issue:2
Phenyl-substituted prostaglandins: potent and selective antiglaucoma agents.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID418262Increase in glutathione levels in aqueous humor of carbomer-induced glaucomatous pigmented rabbit at 0.005%, topical administration continuously for 5 days by fluorimetry2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 19, Issue:6
New prostaglandin derivative for glaucoma treatment.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1473784Drug concentration at steady state in human at 1.5 ug administered as 1 drop intraocularly QD after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID418263Increase in cGMP levels in aqueous humor of carbomer-induced glaucomatous pigmented rabbit at 0.005%, topical administration continuously for 5 days by radioimmunoassay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 19, Issue:6
New prostaglandin derivative for glaucoma treatment.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID417991Effect on intraocular pressure in carbomer-induced glaucoma in New Zealand albino rabbit assessed as AUC at 0.005%, topical administration measured after 4 hrs2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 19, Issue:6
New prostaglandin derivative for glaucoma treatment.
AID48546Maximum irritation of cat eyes after topical administration of 3 ug of the compound1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-22, Volume: 36, Issue:2
Phenyl-substituted prostaglandins: potent and selective antiglaucoma agents.
AID418259Increase in glutathione levels in aqueous humor of normotensive pigmented rabbit at 0.005%, topical administration2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 19, Issue:6
New prostaglandin derivative for glaucoma treatment.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID417989Effect on intraocular pressure in carbomer-induced glaucoma in pigmented rabbit assessed as AUC at 0.005%, topical administration continuously for 5 days measured after 4 hrs by fluorimetry2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 19, Issue:6
New prostaglandin derivative for glaucoma treatment.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID485979Inhibition of CETP in rabbit serum at 10 uM after 1 hr by fluorescent cholesteryl esters transfer assay2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Discovery of new cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors via ligand-based pharmacophore modeling and QSAR analysis followed by synthetic exploration.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1473783AUC in human at 1.5 ug administered as 1 drop intraocularly QD after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID417992Effect on intraocular pressure in carbomer-induced glaucoma in pigmented rabbit assessed as AUC at 0.005%, topical administration continuously for 5 days2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 19, Issue:6
New prostaglandin derivative for glaucoma treatment.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1473785Ratio of drug concentration at steady state in human at 1.5 ug administered as 1 drop intraocularly QD after 24 hrs to IC50 for human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID679659TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of PGE1 uptake (PGE1: 0.0004 uM) in PGT-expressing HeLa cells2002Experimental eye research, Jan, Volume: 74, Issue:1
Comparison between isopropyl unoprostone and latanoprost by prostaglandin E(2)induction, affinity to prostaglandin transporter, and intraocular metabolism.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
AID1346394Human FP receptor (Prostanoid receptors)2000Biochimica et biophysica acta, Jan-17, Volume: 1483, Issue:2
The utilization of recombinant prostanoid receptors to determine the affinities and selectivities of prostaglandins and related analogs.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (1,442)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's174 (12.07)18.2507
2000's728 (50.49)29.6817
2010's423 (29.33)24.3611
2020's117 (8.11)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials527 (33.19%)5.53%
Reviews155 (9.76%)6.00%
Case Studies169 (10.64%)4.05%
Observational15 (0.94%)0.25%
Other722 (45.47%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (211)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase 1, Open-label, Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Latanoprost Sustained Release (SR) Insert in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) or Ocular Hypertension (OHT) [NCT01180062]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated early due to manufacturer not replenishing study site supply of inserts, despite repeated requests for more inserts.)
Topical Application of Latanoprost in Diabetic Retinopathy [NCT01225653]Phase 427 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Effect of Alphagan and Xalatan Eye Drops on Corneal Temperature [NCT01201551]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
A Phase I, Multi-Center, Randomized, Adaptive, Investigator/Patient Masked, Multiple-Ascending Dose, Placebo and Active Comparator-Controlled Parallel Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of RO7058584 Follo [NCT03293992]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-10Completed
Effects of Latanoprost, Bimatoprost and Travoprost in Patients With Latanoprost-resistant Glaucoma [NCT01361841]141 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-01-31Recruiting
Effectiveness of Microneedling and Topical Latanoprost in Treatment of Acrofacial Vitiligo [NCT03611348]Phase 2/Phase 370 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-01Not yet recruiting
[NCT02047630]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Problem with IP supply)
Multi Center, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled, Parallel Design, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CKD-351 in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients [NCT03762369]Phase 3384 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-07Not yet recruiting
A Prospective, Double-masked, Randomized, Multicenter, Active-controlled, Parallel-group, 6-month Study Assessing the Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of PG324 Ophthalmic Solution Compared to GANFORT® (Bimatoprost 0.03% / Timolol 0.5%) Ophthalmic So [NCT03284853]Phase 3436 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-05Completed
Phase II, Randomized, Double-masked, Active-controlled Study of Fixed-Dose Combinations of Trabodenoson and Latanoprost in Subjects With Ocular Hypertension or Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma [NCT02829996]Phase 2201 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-19Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label Study of Latanoprost Acid Plasma Concentrations in Pediatric and Adult Glaucoma Patients Treated With Latanoprost 0.005%. [NCT00638742]Phase 147 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Choroidal Thickness and Its Correlations With Ocular Parameters in Cases With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma [NCT03966560]Phase 496 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Comparison of the Effects of Latanoprost(0.005%) and Brinzolamide(1.0%) on Intraocular Pressure in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension [NCT01084902]130 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Active, not recruiting
Examination of Ocular Surface Effects With Administration of TRAVATAN Z® and Xalatan® [NCT00708422]Phase 4231 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Efficacy of Unilateral Latanoprost-loaded Punctual Plug in Patients With Open Angle Early Visual Field Defects Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension in Comparison to Xalatan © Eye Drops in the Second Eye [NCT03318146]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-01Not yet recruiting
An Evaluation of the Usability and Patient Tolerability for Microtherapeutic Dosing of Commercially Available Ocular Medication Via the Eyenovia Microdose Delivery System (MiDD) [NCT03480906]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-12Completed
A Phase 2, Double-masked, Randomized, Active-controlled, Crossover Study Assessing the Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of AR-12286 or Timolol Added to Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pressure Currently Using Latanoprost [NCT01302249]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
[NCT00761709]Phase 2104 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A Randomised Control Study to Investigate if the Continuation of Prostaglandin Analogue Treatments in the Post-operative Phase of Glaucoma Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery Increases the Incidence of Cystoid Macular Oedema. [NCT03292796]Phase 256 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-07Completed
Comparison Between the Effect of Latanoprost 0.005%, Travoprost 0.004% and Tafluprost 0.0015% on Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation in Patients Having Primary Open-angle Glaucoma [NCT04461249]60 participants (Actual)Observational2019-06-01Completed
African Glaucoma Laser Trial [NCT03648229]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding unavailable)
Multi Center, Randomized, Open-label, Active Controlled, Phase 2 Trial, Proof Of Concept Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CKD-351 in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients [NCT04448223]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-11Recruiting
An Investigator-Masked, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of OPA-6566 Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT01410188]Phase 1/Phase 2160 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
An Open-Label, Phase 2 Study of the Latanoprost Punctal Plug Delivery System (L-PPDS) With Adjunctive Xalatan® Eye Drops in Subjects With Ocular Hypertension (OH) or Open-Angle Glaucoma (OAG) [NCT01037036]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A Phase II, Randomized, Masked, Parallel-Group Study of Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of the Punctum Plug Delivery System in Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00650702]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Special Investigation Of Long Term Use Of Xalacom(Regulatory Post Marketing Commitment Plan) [NCT01191008]661 participants (Actual)Observational2010-10-31Completed
[NCT02179008]Phase 2184 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Evaluation of Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients With Pre-existing Ocular Surface Disease Switched From a Preserved Prostaglandin Analog - Timolol Fixed Combination to a Preservative - Free Latanoprost - Timolol Fixed Combination [NCT04891588]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-08Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of the Latanoprost Punctal Plug Delivery System (L PPDS)in Subjects With Ocular Hypertension (OH) or Open Angle Glaucoma (OAG) [NCT01229982]Phase 2121 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Latanoprost Plus NB-UVB Versus Each Alone in Non-segmental Vitiligo: Clinical and Laboratory Evaluation [NCT04811326]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-13Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Al-37807 Ophthalmic Suspension vs. Timolol Gel Forming Solution and Vehicle, All Dosed Concomitantly With Xalatan in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00620256]Phase 2129 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Phase 1/2 Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Dose-Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of 3 Dose Levels of the VS101 Subconjunctival Latanoprost Insert for 3 Months in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hyperten [NCT02129673]Phase 1/Phase 277 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
[NCT01318252]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Catioprost® (Unpreserved Latanoprost 0.005% Emulsion) Compared to Travatan Z® in Subjects With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension and Ocular Surface Disease [NCT01254370]Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
[NCT00892762]Phase 3434 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
An Open-Label, Phase 2 Study of Punctal Placement of the Latanoprost Punctal Plug System (L-PPDS) in Subjects With Ocular Hypertension (OH) or Open-Angle Glaucoma (OAG) [NCT00821002]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
An Open-Label, Phase 2 Study of the Latanoprost Punctal Plug Delivery System (L-PPDS) in Subjects With Ocular Hypertension (OH) or Open Angle Glaucoma (OAG) [NCT00820300]Phase 2113 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Circadian Rhythms of Aqueous Humor Dynamics in Humans [NCT00572936]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-13Completed
Stop Retinal Ganglion Cell Dysfunction Study [NCT02390284]Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Active, not recruiting
Comparative Evaluation of Intraocular Pressure During the 24 Hour in Patients Affected by Primary Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: Latanoprost 0.005% Versus Tafluprost 0.0015% Ophthalmic Solutions [NCT01162603]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Prospective, Double-masked, Randomized, Multi-center, Active-controlled, Parallel-group, 3-month Study Assessing the Safety & Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of TC-002 Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005% in Subjects With Ele [NCT05165290]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-29Active, not recruiting
A 4 Week, Dose-Ranging, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel Study Comparing The Efficacy, Safety, And Tolerability Of Latanoprost 75, 100 And 125 ug/ml To Xalatan In The Treatment Of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Aand Ocular Hypertension [NCT01379144]Phase 2282 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
An Open Label, Comparative, Sequential-dose, Multi-centre Study Involving Intracameral Administration of a PA5108 Latanoprost FA SR Ocular Implant Into the Eye of Patients With Mild-moderate Glaucoma [NCT04060758]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-11Recruiting
A Phase 2, Double-masked, Randomized, Active-controlled, Dose-response Study Assessing the Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of AR-12286 in Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pressure [NCT01060579]Phase 2217 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Phase I Study of Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Topical Solution in Male Subjects With Androgenetic Alopecia [NCT05864885]Phase 114 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-09Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Adding the Brinzolamide/Timolol Maleate Fixed Combination (AZARGA®) to Ocular Hypertensive or Glaucoma Patients Uncontrolled on Prostaglandin Monotherapy [NCT01263444]Phase 447 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
The Effects of Latanoprost, Bimatoprost and Travoprost on Periocular Skin Pigmentation [NCT00705757]Phase 489 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Observational Study Assessing The Efficacy And Tolerability Of Xalatan™ In Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma And /Or Ocular Hypertension. [NCT00950690]1,289 participants (Actual)Observational2005-07-31Completed
A 2-STAGE, PHASE 2, DOUBLE-MASKED, RANDOMIZED, VEHICLE CONTROLLED, DOSE RESPONSE TRIAL OF PF-04217329 AND THE MARKETED FORMULATION OF LATANOPROST IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA OR OCULAR HYPERTENSION [NCT00572455]Phase 2318 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-11Completed
The International Collaborative Exfoliation Syndrome Treatment Study [NCT00804115]277 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-08-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase III, Open-label, Single-arm, Multi-center Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Who Are Non-/Low-responders to Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution: FUJ [NCT02822742]Phase 326 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-02Completed
A Partially Masked, Phase 2 Study of the Latanoprost Punctal Plug Delivery System (L-PPDS) in Subjects With Ocular Hypertension (OH) or Open-Angle Glaucoma (OAG) [NCT00855517]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor's decision)
Short-term Effect of Rho-kinase Inhibitor on Retinal Circulation [NCT04234932]Early Phase 110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-06Recruiting
Phase IV Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy of the Krytantek Ofteno PF® Plus Gaap Ofteno PF® Combination to the Krytantek Ofteno PF® Plus Gaap Ofteno PF® Combination, in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients. [NCT04702789]Phase 428 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-19Terminated(stopped due to For interests of sponsor.)
PPL GLAU 13: A Randomized Phase 2 Study of the Effect of Plug Placement on Efficacy and Safety of the Latanoprost Punctal Plug Delivery System (L-PPDS) in Subjects With Ocular Hypertension (OH) or Open-Angle Glaucoma (OAG) [NCT01481077]Phase 277 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, Phase 2 Study of the Effects of Artificial Tears Preserved With Benzalkonium Chloride (AT-BAK) on the Response to the Latanoprost Punctal Plug Delivery System (L PPDS) in Subjects With Ocular Hypertension (OH) or Open-Angle Glau [NCT00845299]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Multicentric, Prospective, Crossover, Double Blind Clinical Study to Evaluate the Non-inferiority of PRO-067 an Ophthlamic Solution Manufactured by Laboratorios Sophia S.A.de C.V., Previous Treatment With GAAP Ofteno ®, in Subjects With Primary Open-ang [NCT02801617]Phase 3116 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Terminated(stopped due to expiration time limit of recruitment)
Comparison of the Effects of Bimatoprost and a Fixed Combination of Latanoprost and Timolol on 24-hour Blood and Ocular Perfusion Pressures [NCT02154217]Phase 3200 participants (Actual)InterventionalCompleted
Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup Valdemar Hansens Vej 13, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark [NCT04957329]Phase 428 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-01Recruiting
A Randomized, Parallel, Open-label Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety Effects Using Mikelan® LA Ophthalmic Solution (OS) 2% Versus Timoptol® XE Ophthalmic Solution (OS) 0.5% in Ocular Hypertension Patients [NCT00972426]Phase 432 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
A 6-month, Randomized, Double-masked Comparison of PhXA41 With Timolol in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. A Multi-centre Study in the United Kingdom [NCT00751049]Phase 3294 participants (Actual)Interventional1992-12-31Completed
A 6-month, Randomized, Double-masked Comparison of Latanoprost (PhXA41) With Timolol in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. A Multi-centre Study in the United States. [NCT00751127]Phase 3268 participants (Actual)Interventional1993-01-31Completed
24-hour IOP Control With the Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Compared With the Latanoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination, When Both Are Dosed in the Evening in Patients With Exfoliative Glaucoma [NCT00757835]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A 6-month, Randomized, Double-masked Comparison of Fixed Combination of Latanoprost and Timolol With the Individual Components, Continuing Into a 6-month Open Label Safety Study of Fixed Combination in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. A Mult [NCT00800267]Phase 3418 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-07-31Completed
Proof of Concept of Latanoprost/Minoxidil (ANR-001.1) Topical Formulation for Eyebrows [NCT05790941]Early Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-11Recruiting
A 12 Week Comparison of DuoTrav and Xalacom at 24 Hours Post-Dose in the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma (the DVX Study) [NCT00887029]Phase 454 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Examination of Ocular Surface Effects With Administration of TRAVATAN Z® and XALATAN® [NCT00798759]Phase 4236 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Dose Response Study of AL-37807 Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00465621]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Blinded Evaluator, Active Control, Parallel, Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Xalost S in Glaucoma Patients. [NCT04164459]Phase 4144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-19Recruiting
Pharmacological Intervention Against Diabetic Retinal Flow Disturbances. [NCT00619034]87 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
[NCT00872651]Phase 3242 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Relationship Between Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation and Retinal Ganglion Cell Function in Eyes Receiving Latanoprost 0.005% Versus Placebo [NCT01042665]82 participants (Actual)Observational2006-02-28Completed
Central Corneal Thickness and 24-hour Fluctuation of Intraocular Pressure [NCT00941525]Phase 4174 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A 8-WEEK, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-MASKED, PARALLEL GROUP, PHASE III STUDY COMPARING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF XALACOM AND XALATAN IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA (POAG) OR OCULAR HYPERTENSION (OH) [NCT00383019]Phase 3300 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-14Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Latanoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Dosed Twice Daily Compared to Once Daily in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma [NCT04098861]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-02Recruiting
Blood Flow of Ophthalmic Artery and Its Relationship to Structural Properties of the Optic Nerve and Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma [NCT02656979]125 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-12-31Recruiting
An Evaluation of the Ocular Surface Health in Subjects Using TRAVATAN Z® Ophthalmic Solution Versus XALATAN® Ophthalmic Solution [NCT00761319]Phase 3705 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, Double-Masked, 12-Week, Parallel Group Study Evaluating The Efficacy And Safety Of Latanoprost And Timolol In Pediatric Subjects With Glaucoma. [NCT00716859]Phase 3139 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A Pilot Study on the Effects of Cosopt on IOP Lowering and Ocular Diastolic Perfusion Pressure in Patients Not Controlled With Xalatan Monotherapy [NCT00796198]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-12-31Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of Topical Latanoprost 0.005% Verses Timolol 0.5% Demonstrated by Corneal Biomechanical Correcting Modified Goldmann Prism [NCT04178863]Phase 472 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-01Recruiting
Effects of Latanoprost on Choroidal Blood Flow Regulation in Human Subjects [NCT00712400]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-masked, Placebo- and Active-controlled, Multi-Center, Dose Escalation Trial of DE-104 Ophthalmic Solution in Japanese and Non-Japanese Subjects With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00868894]Phase 1/Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
A Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Cosopt® Versus Xalacom® on Ocular Hemodynamics and Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma [NCT00815373]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to no participants recruded.)
A Phase 2, Single-masked, Randomized, Crossover Study Of The 24-hour Intraocular Pressure Lowering And Systemic Exposure of Pf-04217329 Alone And In Combination With Latanoprost [NCT00934089]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A 6-month, Randomized, Double-masked Comparison of PhXA41 With Timolol in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. A Multi-centre Study in Scandinavia [NCT00751062]Phase 3267 participants (Actual)Interventional1992-11-30Completed
A 28-day Double-masked, Randomized, Parallel-group, Active Controlled Study of ONO-9054 Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Ocular Hypertension (OHT) or Open-angle Glaucoma (OAG) [NCT02083289]Phase 2123 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
A Phase 2 Single-Masked, Randomized Study of the Latanoprost Punctal Plug Delivery System (L-PPDS) in Subjects With Ocular Hypertension or Open-Angle Glaucoma [NCT02014142]Phase 286 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
A Phase II Multi-center, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Monocular Addition of Trabodenoson (INO-8875) Ophthalmic Formulation to Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution Therapy in Adults With Ocular Hypertension or Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma [NCT01917383]Phase 2101 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
An Evaluation of the Ocular Surface Health in Subjects Using TRAVATAN Z® Ophthalmic Solution Versus XALATAN® Ophthalmic Solution [NCT00690794]Phase 3726 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Comparison of the Effects of Latanoprost and Timolol on Aqueous Humor Dynamics in Ocular Hypertensive Patients [NCT00579969]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Study stopped and data not analyzed)
A Comparison of Brinzolamide Ophthalmic Suspension, 1% (Azopt) TID vs. Placebo TID Added to Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution, 0.005% (Xalatan) in Patients With Elevated IOP on a Prostaglandin [NCT00759941]Phase 486 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Ocular Surface Changes With Topical Prostaglandin Analog Therapy [NCT00798694]Phase 458 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
An 8 Week, Single Masked, Parallel-Group, Exploratory Study Comparing Ocular Surface Signs and Symptoms in Monotherapy Ocular Hypertension or Glaucoma Patients Randomized to Either Xalatan® or Travatan Z® [NCT00799682]Phase 456 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
[NCT01151904]Phase 417 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty with patient recruitment)
A Randomized, Observer-masked Study of the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacodynamics of Sequential Ascending 28-Day Repeated Topical Doses of SAR366234 Versus Latanoprost in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT02531152]Phase 154 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
24-Hour Intraocular Pressure Control Obtained With the Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Compared With Latanoprost as First Choice Therapy in Subjects With Exfoliation Syndrome, or Exfoliative Glaucoma [NCT01448837]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Determination Of Predictive Factors Allowing To An Additional 10% Reduction Of Intra-Ocular Pressure After A 12-Week Treatment With Latanoprost 0.005% / Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination (Xalacom) In Previously Treated Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma Or Oc [NCT00230763]Phase 3396 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Phase 2 Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Randomized, 28-Day Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Single or Twice Daily Doses of AKB-9778 Ophthalmic Solution as an Adjunct to Latanoprost in Patients With Ocular Hypertension (OHT) or Open An [NCT04405245]Phase 2194 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-06Completed
An 8-Week, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study Comparing The Efficacy And Safety Of Xalacom With The Combination Of Unfixed Latanoprost And Timolol In Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma Or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00219596]Phase 3240 participants Interventional2005-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Determine the Efficacy, the Duration of Action, and Safety of Latanoprost in Patients With Menière's Disease [NCT01973114]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Active, not recruiting
Intraocular Pressure and Tolerability Study of Preservative Free Bimatoprost 0.03% Unit Dose (BUDPF) or Preservative Free Latanoprost 0.005% Unit Dose (LUDPF) (Monoprost®) in Patients With Ocular Hypertension or Glaucoma: A Randomized, Single Masked, 3 Mo [NCT01975714]Phase 467 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Blood-aqueous Barrier Changes After the Use of Timolol and Prostaglandin Analogues Fixed Combination in Pseudophakic Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma [NCT01978015]Phase 469 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Liposomal Latanoprost in Ocular Hypertensive Patients [NCT01987323]Phase 1/Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Geltim LP® 1 mg/g (Unpreserved Timolol Gel - TG1030) in Ocular Hypertensive or Glaucomatous Patients Stabilized by Xalatan® With Ocular Intolerance Signs. [NCT01155219]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Efficacy of Topical 5-fluorouracil Versus Topical Latanoprost With Microneedling in Localized Stable Vitiligo: A Randomised Clinical Trial [NCT05513924]Phase 2/Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-15Completed
Comparison of Bimatoprost and Lataprost in Patients With Chronic Angle-Closure Glaucoma: A Randomized Cross-Over Study [NCT00567788]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-07-31Active, not recruiting
The Effects of the Xal-Ease Delivery Aid Device on Patient Compliance With Xalatan Eye Drops [NCT00573638]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-02-28Recruiting
Additive Intra-ocular Pressure Reduction Effect of Fixed Combination of Maleate Timolol 0.5%/Dorzolamide 2% on Monotherapy With Latanoprost in Patients With Elevated Intra-ocular Pressure: a Prospective, Four-week, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Clini [NCT00906594]Phase 456 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Prospective, Unmasked, Randomized Evaluation of the iStent Versus Two Ocular Hypotensive Agents in Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma [NCT00913029]Phase 4192 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Observer-Masked, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of STN1012600 Ophthalmic Solution 0.002% Compared With Latanoprost 0.005% in Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocul [NCT05495061]Phase 3325 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-08-09Completed
Open Multicenter Study on the Efficacy of Xalatan at 3 Months as First-line Therapy in Naive Patients With Ocular Hypertension (OH) or Open Angle Glaucoma (OAG), Based on Initial Intraocular Pressure (IOP): 20 mmHg Less Than or Equal to IOP Less Than 24 m [NCT00647101]Phase 4600 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
A Double-masked Randomized Cross-over Study Comparing of the Effect of Xalacom® (Latanoprost/Timolol)and Combigan® (Brimonidine/Timolol) Fixed Combination on Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Blood Flow in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular [NCT00706927]16 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-masked, Placebo- and Active- Controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-center, Dose-response Trial of DE-104 Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00650338]Phase 2165 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Biodegradation Period of PA5346 Latanoprost Free Acid (FA) Sustained Release (SR) Ocular Implant When Administered to Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT05333419]Phase 16 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-04Recruiting
An 8 Week Comparison of Xalatan (Latanoprost) to Apo-latanoprost and Co-latanoprost in the Treatment of Open Angle Glaucoma [NCT02792803]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Recruiting
Phase 2 Study of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Lowering Efficacy of Transdermal Latanoprost Therapy [NCT01426464]Phase 222 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-09-30Not yet recruiting
Randomized,Active Comparator-Controlled,Three Months,Open Label Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Refrigeration-Free Latanoprost (0.005%) and Latanoprost (0.005%) Stored at Refrigeration Temperature in Patients With OAG or OHT [NCT01430923]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Comparison of Latanoprost (Xalatan) With Travoprost (Travatan) and Bimatoprost (Lumigan) in Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pressure. A Twelve-week, Masked Evaluator, Phase IV, Multicenter Study in the United States. (Xalatan vs Travatan vs Lumigan). [NCT00847483]Phase 4375 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
A 6-Month, Randomized, Double-Masked Comparison Of Fixed Combination Of Latanoprost And Timolol With The Individual Components, Continuing Into A 6-Month Open Label Safety Study Of Fixed Combination In Patients With Glaucoma Or Ocular Hypertension. [NCT00856622]Phase 3436 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-08-31Completed
A Phase II/III Randomized, Double-masked, Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension -AYAME Study- [NCT02623738]Phase 2/Phase 3253 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-06Completed
A MULTIPLE-CENTER, INVESTIGATOR/SUBJECT MASKED, ADAPTIVE, MULTIPLE ASCENDING DOSE, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL STUDY TO INVESTIGATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF RO5093151 FOLLOWING 7 DAYS ADMINISTRATION [NCT02622334]Phase 145 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-29Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Latanoprost (Xalatan) and Bimatoprost (Lumigan) Ophthalmic Solutions in Promoting Eyelash Growth in Patients With Alopecia Areata [NCT00187577]14 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
A Phase II, Randomized, Observer-masked, Placebo-and Active-controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-center Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution Compared With Latanoprost and Placebo in Subjects With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma o [NCT01868126]Phase 291 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Trabeculectomy Versus 2-iStent and Prostaglandin Study [NCT03274323]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-12Withdrawn(stopped due to Difficulty obtaining IDE by the FDA. Currently not worthwhile to pursue further.)
[NCT00440141]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
[NCT00293800]Phase 3173 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
Latanoprost Eluting Contact Lens for Treating Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension [NCT04500574]Phase 131 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-03Recruiting
A Phase 2, 28 Day Parallel-Group, Double-Masked, Dose-Finding Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of PF-03187207 to Latanoprost [NCT00441883]Phase 2176 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
[NCT00273481]Phase 433 participants Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel Group Comparison Of Xalacom Given In The Evening, Xalatan Given In The Evening, And Timolol Given In The Morning In Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma Or Ocular Hypertension In The United States. [NCT00277498]Phase 3528 participants Interventional2005-12-31Completed
The 24 Control of IOP in Ocular Hypertension: a Cross-over Study on Inflow Versus Outflow Drugs. [NCT01655758]Phase 461 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
[NCT00287521]Phase 287 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
A 12-Month Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Instillation of Combination Glaucoma Therapy in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00311389]Phase 3408 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
An Evaluation of Use of Topical Ocular Hypotensive Medication by Electronic Compliance Measures [NCT00329095]Phase 460 participants Interventional2005-12-31Completed
24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) And Blood Pressure Control In Glaucoma And Ocular Hypertension Patients [NCT00330577]Phase 430 participants Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Phase 4 Study to Evaluate Efficacy And Safety of Three Different Preparations of Latanoprost 0,005% Eyedrops in Subjects Affected by Primary Open Angle Glaucoma [NCT01580254]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-06-30Recruiting
Brimonidine Purite 0.15% Versus Dorzolamide 2% Used as Adjunctive Therapy to Latanoprost [NCT00348400]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
Effect Of Corneal Versus Conjunctival Delivery On The Corneal Safety, Tolerability, and Antihypertensive Efficacy Of The Xalatan Ophthalmic Delivery Device [NCT00143429]Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn
Short Term Comparative Study of Xalatan With Benzalkonium Chloride vs. Travatan Z Without Benzalkonium Chloride in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00468988]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
[NCT00539526]Phase 4106 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
[NCT00541242]Phase 4586 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
[NCT00527592]Phase 454 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
[NCT00716742]1,099 participants (Actual)Observational2004-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Open-Label Rocklatan® (Netarsudil/Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution) 0.02%/0.005% Evaluation of IOP Lowering Efficacy and Safety as Replacement of Current Medical Therapy Regimen for the Reduction of Elevated Intraocular Pressure in Patients [NCT05283395]Phase 4136 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-28Completed
A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel Group Comparison Of Xalacom Given In The Evening, Xalatan Given In The Evening, And Timolol Given In The Morning In Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma Or Ocular Hypertension. [NCT00159653]Phase 3500 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Comparison of Efficacy of Prostaglandin Analogues (Xalatan) and Aqueous Suppressants (Cosopt) in Reducing Intraocular Pressure Following Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in the Management of Open-Angle Glaucoma. [NCT00440336]30 participants Interventional2006-10-31Recruiting
A Safety and Efficacy Study of Travoprost 0.004% Compared to Latanoprost 0.005% in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00051142]Phase 30 participants Interventional2001-02-28Completed
A Safety and Efficacy Study of Travoprost 0.004% Compared to Latanoprost 0.005% in Patients With Chronic Angle-Closure Glaucoma. [NCT00051181]Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-01-31Completed
Phase II Safety and Efficacy Study to Evaluate a Glaucoma Therapy in Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients [NCT00069706]Phase 2118 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
"A Randomized Post-Marketing Efficacy And Safety Study Of Xalatan Compared With Usual Care Over 36 Months In Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, Exfoliative Glaucoma Or Ocular Hypertension" [NCT00140062]Phase 4329 participants Interventional2002-02-28Completed
A 4-week Multi-center, Single-masked, Randomized, Latanoprost-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of RKI983 (0.05% and 0.10%) Ophthalmic Solution Given Twice a Day Versus Once Daily Latanoprost 0.005%, in Patie [NCT00846989]Phase 1/Phase 2276 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Prospective, Double-masked, Randomized, Multi-center, Active Controlled, Parallel-group, 3-month Study Assessing the Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of PG324 Ophthalmic Solution Compared to AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% and Latanoprost Ophth [NCT02674854]Phase 3750 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
24-hour IOP With DTFC and LTFC Monotherapies and the Adjunctive Therapy of DTFC and Latanoprost in Open-angle Glaucoma Insufficiently Controlled With Latanoprost Monotherapy. [NCT00397241]Phase 433 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Prospective,Randomized,Masked,Study to Evaluate the Interaction of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Agent With IOP-Lowering Effect of Brimonidine or Latanoprost. [NCT00402493]51 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
A 6-Week Safety and Efficacy Study of TRAVATAN Compared to XALCOM in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. [NCT00051155]Phase 30 participants Interventional2001-01-31Completed
Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Combigan With Timolol Adjunctive to Xalatan in Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Subjects [NCT00735449]Phase 4204 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy to Reduce the IOP of the Fixed Association of Latanoprost 0.005% (50 μg/mL)/ Brinzolamide 1% (10mg/mL) Drops, Compared to Latanoprost 0.005% (50 μg/mL) Drops, in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT01721707]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to withdrawn by industry)
Prospective, Single Center Switching Study of 0.0015% Tafluprost Ophthalmic Solution in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Patients With Corneal Disorders [NCT04737928]1 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-02Completed
[NCT00273429]Phase 40 participants Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A Phase 3, 12-Week, Parallel-Design Study Comparing The Safety, Efficacy, and Ease Of Use Of Xalatan When Self-Administered By Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma Or Ocular Hypertension Using Either A Conventional Dropper Bottle Or A Forced-Flow Delivery De [NCT00283764]Phase 30 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn
A Study of Glaucoma Therapy to Treat Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00293787]Phase 3156 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
[NCT00304785]Phase 436 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Influence of Travoprost 0.004% and Latanoprost 0.005% on Retinal Vascular Diameter and Choroidal Blood Flow in Glaucoma Patients [NCT00308945]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
Efficacy of Bimatoprost 0.03% in Patients Who Are Low-Responders to Latanoprost [NCT00347841]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Topical Medical Therapy With Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in South Indian Population [NCT01639807]600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-10-31Recruiting
24-Hour Efficacy of Travoprost/Timolol Benzalkonium Chloride BAK Free Compared With Latanoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Therapy in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma Insufficiently Controlled With Latanoprost Monotherapy [NCT01779284]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter, Single-Masked, Parallel-Group Dose Finding Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of BOL-303259-X to Latanoprost in Subjects With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT01223378]Phase 2413 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-13Completed
In Vivo Effects of Antiglaucomatous Prostaglandin Therapy on Immune Cells, Epithelium, and Nerves of the Ocular Surface: A Laser In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Study [NCT01315574]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Slow Enrollment)
Latanoprost Preserved Versus Unpreserved: Effect on Tear Film Thickness as Measured With OCT [NCT02585375]Phase 470 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-17Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Fixed Combination Unpreserved Latanoprost Eye Drops and Timolol 0.5% (T2347) Versus Xalacom® in Ocular Hypertensive or Glaucomatous Patients. [NCT02278614]Phase 3242 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
The Advantage of Switching From Preserved to Preserved-free Treatments in Glaucoma. A Clinical and Confocal Study. [NCT01433900]Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-05-31Recruiting
The Secondary Beneficial Effects of Prostaglandin Analog Treatment in Thyroid Eye Disease Patients. [NCT01927406]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding source unavailable)
A Prospective, Double-masked, Randomized, Multi-center, Active-controlled, Parallel-group 12-month Study Assessing the Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of PG324 Ophthalmic Solution Compared to AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution, 0.02% and Latanoprost Opht [NCT02558400]Phase 3718 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-18Completed
[NCT01243567]Phase 481 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-01Completed
A Multi Center, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Design, Exploratory Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of D565H Twice Daily Versus D565 Once Daily in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients. [NCT03067415]Phase 298 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-30Recruiting
Phase 3, Randomized, Adaptive Dose-Selection, Multi-regional, Double-Masked, Parallel-Group, 3-Month Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of NCX 470 vs. Latanoprost 0.005% in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension (Mont Blanc) [NCT04445519]Phase 3670 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-01Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Multicenter, Masked, Parrallel-Group, Dose-Response Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of NCX 470 (3 Doses: 0.021%, 0.042%, and 0.065%) vs. Latanoprost 0.005% in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT03657797]Phase 2656 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-01Completed
[NCT01525173]Phase 4137 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Response Time of Latanoprost 0.005% in Patients With Glaucoma [NCT00224289]Phase 417 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
Comparison of Efficacy and Ocular Surface Disease Assessment Between Monoprost and BAK-preserved Latanoprost in Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertensive Patients [NCT04743622]Phase 457 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-30Completed
An Open-label Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Subconjunctival Liposomal Latanoprost (POLAT-001) to Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Ocular Hypertension and Primary Open Angle Glaucoma [NCT02466399]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Comparison of Preserved and Preservative-free Latanoprost 0.005% in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertensive Patients, at Guinness Eye Centre, Lagos. [NCT05606796]Phase 476 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-31Recruiting
A Pilot, Single-Masked Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of ALZ-1101 (Latanoprost 0.005%/Dorzolamide 2.0%) to Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution, 0.005% in Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension With Intraocular Pressure Inad [NCT01896180]Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
To Prove the Non-inferiority of Cosopt Compared to Xalatan in the Aspects of Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Perfusion Pressure in Subjects With Normal Tension Glaucoma [NCT01175902]44 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
[NCT01253902]Phase 4164 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Preservative-free Fixed-dose Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% / Timolol 0.5% in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: Clinical Effectiveness, Tolerability and Safety in a Real World Setting [NCT04828057]50 participants (Actual)Observational2021-09-01Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter, Parallel-Group, Observer-Masked, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of T-2345 Ophthalmic Solution to Xalatan (Latanoprost 0.005%) in Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT02059278]Phase 3335 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Monoprost® in Comparison With Lumigan® 0.01% and Lumigan® 0.03% Unit Dose, in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension, Stabilized by Lumigan® 0.01% With Ocular Surface Intolerance [NCT02017327]Phase 4379 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
A Phase IIb, Randomized, Observer-Masked, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multinational and Multicenter Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of DE-126 Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertensi [NCT03216902]Phase 2241 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-25Completed
Effect of Nailfold Application of Latanoprostene Bunod on Nailfold Capillary Blood Flow [NCT03949244]Phase 447 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-15Completed
[NCT02105272]Phase 3237 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
A Phase III, Multinational, Multicenter, Investigator-Masked, Randomised, Active-Controlled Trial, Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of DE-130A With Xalatan® in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT04133311]Phase 3386 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-10Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2, 28-Day Parallel-Group, Double-Masked, Dose Finding Study Comparing The Safety And Efficacy Of PF-03187207 To Latanoprost In Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Or Ocular Hypertension. [NCT00595101]Phase 2117 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
[NCT02108288]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Aqueous Humor Dynamic Components That Determine Intraocular Pressure Variance [NCT04412096]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-23Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Multi-Regional, Double-Masked, Parallel-Group Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of NCX 470 0.1% vs. Latanoprost 0.005% in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension (Denali) [NCT04630808]Phase 3670 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-09Recruiting
A Phase 2, Double-masked, Randomized, Multi-center, Active-controlled, Dose-response Parallel-group Study Comparing the Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of AR-13324 to Latanoprost in Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pressure [NCT01731002]Phase 2224 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
[NCT00811564]Phase 4148 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Phase 1/2 Safety and Efficacy Study of JV-GL1 Applied to the Periorbital Skin in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT04761705]Phase 1/Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-10Active, not recruiting
A Phase III, Randomized, Observer-Masked, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multinational and Multicenter Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution 0.002% Compared With Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005% in Subjects With O [NCT02981446]Phase 3370 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Completed
Comparison of Benzalkonium Chloride-containing Latanoprost and Preservative-free Bimatoprost on Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma Patients: a Prospective Randomised Study [NCT04896125]300 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-10-02Recruiting
Multicentric Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of an Innovative Formulation of Benzalkonium Chloride-free Latanoprost in Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma [NCT03331770]Phase 4103 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-06Completed
A Randomized Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Topical Latanoprost Versus Topical Corticosteroid in the Treatment of Localized Alopecia Areata [NCT02350023]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
PPL GLAU 12: A Phase 2 Dose Evaluation Study for the Latanoprost Punctal Plug Delivery System (L-PPDS) in Subjects With Ocular Hypertension (OH) or Open-Angle Glaucoma (OAG) [NCT01481051]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Aqueous Humor Dynamic Components That Determine Intraocular Pressure Variance [NCT01677507]Phase 4135 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Effect of Topical Anti-glaucoma Medications on Late Pupillary Light Reflex, as Evaluated by Pupillometry [NCT02522039]21 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Additive Effect of Twice Daily Brinzolamide 1%/Brimonidine 0.2% Fixed Dose Combination as an Adjunctive Therapy to a Prostaglandin Analogue [NCT02419508]Phase 4290 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-07Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized,Blinded Evaluator, Active Control, Parallel, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TJO-002 in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients [NCT03419975]Phase 3146 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-26Completed
A Double-masked, Randomized, Controlled Study Assessing the Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of PG324 Ophthalmic Solution, 0.01% and PG324 Ophthalmic Solution, 0.02%, Compared to AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution, 0.02% and Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solutio [NCT02057575]Phase 2298 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Phase III, Multi-center, Randomized, Single-blind (to Evaluator), Parallel, and Positive-controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of OPC-1085EL Ophthalmic Solution in the Treatment of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertensio [NCT05583474]Phase 3240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-27Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Prostaglandin Analogue and Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Pediatric Glaucoma [NCT01527682]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00224289 (2) [back to overview]Post-Treatment IOP (Intraocular Pressure)
NCT00224289 (2) [back to overview]Pre-Treatment IOP (Intraocular Pressure)
NCT00383019 (9) [back to overview]Percent Change of IOP From Baseline to Week 8
NCT00383019 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With an IOP of <=18 mmHg at Week 8
NCT00383019 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With an IOP of <=17 mmHg at Week 8
NCT00383019 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With an IOP of <=16 mmHg at Week 8
NCT00383019 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With an IOP Reduction of >=3 mmHg From Baseline to Week 8
NCT00383019 (9) [back to overview]Change of IOP From Baseline to Week 4
NCT00383019 (9) [back to overview]Change of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline to Week 8
NCT00383019 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With an IOP of <=15 mmHg at Week 8
NCT00383019 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With an IOP Reduction of >=2 mmHg From Baseline to Week 8
NCT00441883 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye on Day 28
NCT00441883 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Less Than or Equal to 18 mmHg at Any Visit Through Day 28
NCT00441883 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure IOP at the Day 7, 14, and 21 Visits
NCT00527592 (1) [back to overview]Comfort Immediately After Dosing
NCT00539526 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining With Fluorescein at Month 3
NCT00539526 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Conjunctival Hyperemia Scores at Month 3
NCT00539526 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) at Month 3
NCT00541242 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12
NCT00541242 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 18
NCT00572455 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Ocular Adverse Events (AEs): Stage I
NCT00572455 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Ocular Adverse Events (AEs): Stage II
NCT00572455 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching and Maintaining Target Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP): Stage I
NCT00572455 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 1 (8 AM), 7 (8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, 4 PM), 14 (8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, 4 PM) and Day 28 (8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, 4 PM): Stage II
NCT00572455 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: Stage I
NCT00572455 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 28: Stage II
NCT00572455 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 1 (8 AM), 7 and 14 (8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, 4 PM): Stage I
NCT00572455 (10) [back to overview]Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye: Stage II
NCT00572455 (10) [back to overview]Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye: Stage I
NCT00572455 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching and Maintaining Target Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP): Stage II
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Outflow Facility
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Central Corneal Thickness
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Blood Pressure
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Aqueous Flow
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Episcleral Venous Pressure
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Anterior Chamber Volume
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Uvescleral Outflow
NCT00595101 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye on Day 28
NCT00595101 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Specific Time Points on Day 14 and Day 28
NCT00595101 (3) [back to overview]Target IOP
NCT00690794 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score = 0
NCT00690794 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change at Day 90 From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score
NCT00705757 (1) [back to overview]The Extent of Latanoprost, Bimatoprost and Travoprost Induced Periocular Skin Hyperpigmentation Over a One Year Time Course in Newly Diagnosed Primary Open Angle and Ocular Hypertension Patients.
NCT00708422 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Tear Film Break Up Time (TBUT)
NCT00708422 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score
NCT00716742 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bilateral Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at One Year
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 12 (Observed)
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 12, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 4
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Mean IOP at Week 12
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Mean IOP at Baseline
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Mean IOP at Week 1
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Mean IOP at Week 4
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Therapy Due to a Drug-related Adverse Experience
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 15% IOP Reduction From Baseline at Both Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 1
NCT00735449 (5) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 AM at Week 6
NCT00735449 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Adverse Events
NCT00735449 (5) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 10 AM at Week 12
NCT00735449 (5) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 10 AM at Week 6
NCT00735449 (5) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 AM at Week 12
NCT00759941 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure, 8 AM, at 3 Months
NCT00759941 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure, 12 PM, at 3 Months
NCT00759941 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure, 4 PM, at 3 Months
NCT00759941 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure, Diurnal, at 3 Months
NCT00761319 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change at Day 90 From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score
NCT00761319 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score = 0
NCT00798694 (6) [back to overview]Change in Tear Break up Time (TBUT)
NCT00798694 (6) [back to overview]Conjunctival Hyperemia Score
NCT00798694 (6) [back to overview]Corneal Staining Score
NCT00798694 (6) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure
NCT00798694 (6) [back to overview]Ocular Surface Disease Index Score
NCT00798694 (6) [back to overview]Tear Production
NCT00798759 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT)
NCT00798759 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score
NCT00811564 (1) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 4 PM (8 Hours)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 6 PM (10 Hours)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 8 Ante Meridiem (AM) (0 Hour)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 8 PM (12 Hours)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 15: 4 AM (20 Hours)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 15: 6 AM (22 Hours)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 15: 8 AM (24 Hours)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Corneal Staining Score at Day 7, 13, 16, 21, 28 and 35
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Diastolic Ocular Perfusion Pressure (DOPP)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Maximum Conjunctival Hyperemia Score
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 15: 12 AM (16 Hours)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Total Corneal Staining Score
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 16: 8 AM (48 Hours)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 17: 8 AM (72 Hours)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 21: 8 AM (168 Hours)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Ocular and Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration for PF-04217329 Active Metabolite (CP-544326) at 0.25 Hours on Day 14
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration for PF-04217329 Active Metabolite (CP-544326) at 0.5 Hours on Day 14
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration for PF-04217329 Active Metabolite (CP-544326) at 0.75 Hours on Day 14
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration for PF-04217329 Active Metabolite (CP-544326) at 1 Hour on Day 14
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration for PF-04217329 Active Metabolite (CP-544326) at 5 Minutes on Day 14
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Corneal Endothelial Cell Counts at Day 13 and 35
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Corneal Thickness at Day 7, 13, 16, 21, 28 and 35
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Ocular Perfusion Pressure (DOPP) at Day 14 (8 AM, 10 AM, 12 PM, 2 PM, 4 PM, 6 PM, 8 PM, 10 PM) and Day 15 (12 AM, 2 AM, 4 AM, 6 AM and 8 AM)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Maximum Conjunctival Hyperemia Score Observed
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 10 AM (2 Hours)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 10 PM (14 Hours)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Photophobia and Iritis
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 12 Post Meridiem (PM) (4 Hours)
NCT00934089 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 2 PM (6 Hours)
NCT01155219 (1) [back to overview]Ocular Tolerance
NCT01175902 (6) [back to overview]Blood Pressure (BP), Period 1
NCT01175902 (6) [back to overview]Blood Pressure (BP), Period 2
NCT01175902 (6) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP), Period 2
NCT01175902 (6) [back to overview]Ocular Perfusion Pressure (OPP), Period 1
NCT01175902 (6) [back to overview]OPP, Period 2
NCT01175902 (6) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP), Period 1
NCT01191008 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Unexpected From Japanese Package Insert
NCT01191008 (3) [back to overview]Clinical Effectiveness Rate
NCT01191008 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants WithTreatment-Related Adverse Events
NCT01223378 (5) [back to overview]Change in IOP at Specified Time Points (8 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM) at Visit 6 (Day 28)
NCT01223378 (5) [back to overview]Change in Mean Diurnal IOP at Visits 4,5, and 7
NCT01223378 (5) [back to overview]IOP
NCT01223378 (5) [back to overview]Change in IOP at Specified Time Points (8 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM) at Visits 4, 5, and 7 (Days 7, 14, and 29)
NCT01223378 (5) [back to overview]Change in Mean Diurnal IOP at Visit 6 (Day 28)
NCT01243567 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline IOP
NCT01243567 (5) [back to overview]Absolute Difference Between Patient's Highest IOP Reading at Baseline (Day 0) and the Corresponding IOP Reading
NCT01243567 (5) [back to overview]Absolute Difference Between Patient's Lowest IOP Reading at Baseline (Day 0) and the Corresponding IOP Reading
NCT01243567 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT01243567 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Reaching a Predefined Target Pressure Threshold
NCT01253902 (3) [back to overview]Mean Tear Break Up Time (TBUT) at Week 12
NCT01253902 (3) [back to overview]Mean Corneal Staining With Fluorescein at Week 12
NCT01253902 (3) [back to overview]Mean Conjunctival Hyperemia at Week 12
NCT01263444 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Reaching the Target IOP (≤ 18 mmHg)
NCT01263444 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 4
NCT01263444 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12
NCT01263444 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP Per Prostaglandin Group at Week 12
NCT01315574 (3) [back to overview]Effectiveness in Lowering Intraocular Pressure
NCT01315574 (3) [back to overview]Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score
NCT01315574 (3) [back to overview]Tear Film Break-Up Time
NCT01525173 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT01527682 (3) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
NCT01527682 (3) [back to overview]Number of Eyes With an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT01527682 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Eyes With Response
NCT01677507 (3) [back to overview]Variation in Episcleral Venous Pressure.
NCT01677507 (3) [back to overview]Variation in Aqueous Flow Between Individuals.
NCT01677507 (3) [back to overview]Variation in Eye Pressure Between Individuals.
NCT01731002 (2) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT01731002 (2) [back to overview]Extent of Exposure
NCT02057575 (1) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT02059278 (5) [back to overview]Visual Acuity
NCT02059278 (5) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure
NCT02059278 (5) [back to overview]Mean Deviation in Visual Field
NCT02059278 (5) [back to overview]Ophthalmoscopy
NCT02059278 (5) [back to overview]Slit Lamp Examination
NCT02105272 (6) [back to overview]Decrease From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 at 2 Hours After IMP Administration
NCT02105272 (6) [back to overview]Decrease From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 at 8 Hours After IMP Administration
NCT02105272 (6) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 at 2 Hours After IMP Administration
NCT02105272 (6) [back to overview]Decrease From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure
NCT02105272 (6) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 Predose
NCT02105272 (6) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 at 8 Hours After IMP Administration
NCT02108288 (4) [back to overview]Cmax of Carteolol
NCT02108288 (4) [back to overview]Tmax of Latanoprost Acid
NCT02108288 (4) [back to overview]Tmax of Carteolol
NCT02108288 (4) [back to overview]Cmax of Latanoprost Acid
NCT02278614 (1) [back to overview]Non-inferiority of T2347 Compared With Xalacom® on Change in Mean IOP at 9.00 am (± 1 Hour) Between the Baseline (Day 0) and Day 84 in the Worse Eye
NCT02419508 (7) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in IOP at 11:00 at Week 6
NCT02419508 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at 09:00 at Week 6
NCT02419508 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at 11:00 at Week 6
NCT02419508 (7) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal IOP at Week 6
NCT02419508 (7) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Change From Baseline at 09:00 at Week 6
NCT02419508 (7) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP at Week 6
NCT02419508 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline (on PGA) in Diurnal IOP (Mean of 09:00 and 11:00 Time Points) at Week 6
NCT02466399 (1) [back to overview]Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure Between Two Measures- Baseline and 3 Months
NCT02558400 (2) [back to overview]Extent of Exposure
NCT02558400 (2) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT02674854 (1) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT02801617 (7) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events.
NCT02801617 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chemosis
NCT02801617 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Ocular Burning
NCT02801617 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Foreign Body Sensation
NCT02801617 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Hyperemia
NCT02801617 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Tearing
NCT02801617 (7) [back to overview]Target Intraocular Pressure (TIOP)
NCT02829996 (1) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT03216902 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure ≤ 18 mmHg in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit
NCT03216902 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Reduction From Baseline ≥ 20%, 25% and 30% in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit
NCT03216902 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Reduction From Baseline ≥ 20%, 25% and 30% in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit
NCT03216902 (12) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Month 3
NCT03216902 (12) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Week 1 and Week 2
NCT03216902 (12) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Week 6
NCT03216902 (12) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit
NCT03216902 (12) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline (CFB) in Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Three Time Points at Each Post-baseline Visit
NCT03216902 (12) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline (CFB) in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit
NCT03216902 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure ≤ 18 mmHg in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit
NCT03216902 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (CFB) in Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Three Time Points at Each Post-baseline Visit
NCT03216902 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (CFB) in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit
NCT03284853 (1) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
NCT03657797 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Study Eye Mean Diurnal IOP at Week 1, Week 2, and Exit Visit
NCT03657797 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Ocular Adverse Events
NCT03657797 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Study Eye Mean Diurnal IOP at the Week 4
NCT03949244 (1) [back to overview]NFC Blood Flow at Baseline and 15 Minutes
NCT04405245 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure at Day 28 (Study Eye)
NCT04405245 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Diurnal Mean IOP at the Day 14 Visit (Study Eye)
NCT04405245 (9) [back to overview]Percentages of Subjects Achieving Pre-Specified Mean, Mean Change, and Percent Mean Change in Diurnal Mean IOP Levels
NCT04405245 (9) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change From Diurnally Adjusted Baseline IOP at Each Time Point on Days 14 and 28
NCT04405245 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Diurnal Mean IOP on Days 14 and 28 (Both Eyes)
NCT04405245 (9) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Diurnal Mean IOP on Days 14 and 28
NCT04405245 (9) [back to overview]Mean Observed IOP at Each Time Point on Days 14 and 28
NCT04405245 (9) [back to overview]Observed Mean Diurnal Mean IOP on Days 14 and 28 (Both Eyes)
NCT04405245 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline IOP at Each Time Point on Days 14 and 28

Post-Treatment IOP (Intraocular Pressure)

Subjects applied topical latanoprost at bedtime for 8 weeks (NCT00224289)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Topical Latanoprost18.3

[back to top]

Pre-Treatment IOP (Intraocular Pressure)

Subjects applied topical latanoprost at bedtime for 8 weeks (NCT00224289)
Timeframe: At baseline (before treatment)

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Topical Latanoprost21.8

[back to top]

Percent Change of IOP From Baseline to Week 8

Value at Week 8 minus value at baseline was divided by baseline value, then multiplied by 100 (NCT00383019)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
KP2035 Group-12.67
Xalatan Group-7.69

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With an IOP of <=18 mmHg at Week 8

Number of subjects who achieved IOP reduction to 18 mmHg or below at Week 8 (NCT00383019)
Timeframe: Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
KP2035 Group105
Xalatan Group91

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With an IOP of <=17 mmHg at Week 8

Number of subjects who achieved IOP reduction to 17 mmHg or below at Week 8 (NCT00383019)
Timeframe: Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
KP2035 Group83
Xalatan Group60

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With an IOP of <=16 mmHg at Week 8

Number of subjects who achieved IOP reduction to 16 mmHg or below at Week 8 (NCT00383019)
Timeframe: Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
KP2035 Group60
Xalatan Group35

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With an IOP Reduction of >=3 mmHg From Baseline to Week 8

Number of subjects whose IOP were reduced by 3 mmHg or more at Week 8 from baseline (NCT00383019)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
KP2035 Group66
Xalatan Group40

[back to top]

Change of IOP From Baseline to Week 4

Value at Week 4 minus value at baseline (NCT00383019)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
KP2035 Group-2.50
Xalatan Group-1.17

[back to top]

Change of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline to Week 8

Value at Week 8 minus value at baseline (NCT00383019)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
KP2035 Group-2.59
Xalatan Group-1.62

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With an IOP of <=15 mmHg at Week 8

Number of subjects who achieved IOP reduction to 15 mmHg or below at Week 8 (NCT00383019)
Timeframe: Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
KP2035 Group36
Xalatan Group13

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With an IOP Reduction of >=2 mmHg From Baseline to Week 8

Number of subjects whose IOP were reduced by 2 mmHg or more at Week 8 from baseline (NCT00383019)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
KP2035 Group95
Xalatan Group65

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye on Day 28

Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer. Diurnal IOP, defined as the mean IOP over the day based on values obtained at 8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, and 4 PM, was calculated for each visit. Both eyes were tested, with the right eye preceding the left eye. The operator initially set the dial at 10 mmHg, then looked through the slit lamp and adjusted the dial to take the reading, and then recorded the results. The procedure was repeated on the same eye twice consecutively. If the measurements were within 2 mmHg or less of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the 2 readings were more than 2 mmHg of each other, a third (consecutive) reading was taken and the median (middle) IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. (NCT00441883)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionmmHg (milimeters of mercury) (Mean)
PF-03187207 0.024% AM-6.96
PF-03187207 0.040% AM-7.09
PF-03187207 0.040% PM-8.20
Latanoprost 0.005% AM-6.02
Latanoprost 0.005% PM-7.28

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Less Than or Equal to 18 mmHg at Any Visit Through Day 28

Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer. Both eyes were tested, with the right eye preceding the left eye. The operator initially set the dial at 10 mmHg, then looked through the slit lamp and adjusted the dial to take the reading, and then recorded the results. The procedure was repeated on the same eye twice consecutively. If the measurements were within 2 mmHg or less of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the 2 readings were more than 2 mmHg of each other, a third (consecutive) reading was taken and the median (middle) IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. (NCT00441883)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PF-03187207 0.024% AM1
PF-03187207 0.040% AM1
PF-03187207 0.040% PM3
Latanoprost 0.005% AM0
Latanoprost 0.005% PM2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure IOP at the Day 7, 14, and 21 Visits

Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer. gBoth eyes were tested, with the right eye preceding the left eye. The operator initially set the dial at 10 mmHg, then looked through the slit lamp and adjusted the dial to take the reading, and then recorded the results. The procedure was repeated on the same eye twice consecutively. If the measurements were within 2 mmHg or less of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the 2 readings were more than 2 mmHg of each other, a third (consecutive) reading was taken and the median (middle) IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. (NCT00441883)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7, Day 14, and Day 21

,,,,
InterventionmmHg (milimeters of mercury) (Mean)
Day 7Day 14Day 21
Latanoprost 0.005% AM-5.49-5.27-5.81
Latanoprost 0.005% PM-6.82-7.0-7.04
PF-03187207 0.024% AM-6.58-7.20-6.68
PF-03187207 0.040% AM-7.20-7.20-7.34
PF-03187207 0.040% PM-7.85-8.18-8.35

[back to top]

Comfort Immediately After Dosing

Comfort was assessed by the patient and recorded on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 = perfect comfort and 100 = worse discomfort imaginable. (NCT00527592)
Timeframe: 5 seconds

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Travoprost7.8
Latanoprost7.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining With Fluorescein at Month 3

Change from baseline in corneal staining with fluorescein at month 3. The cornea is the transparent front part of the eye which covers the iris and pupil. To detect the presence or absence of corneal puncta (tiny disruptions in the surface of the eye), fluorescein dye is administered into the eye and the eye is graded using a 5-point scale where 0 equals no puncta (best), and 3 equals too many puncta to count (worst). A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT00539526)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,,
InterventionScores on a Scale (Mean)
BaselineMonth 3
Bimatoprost 0.03%0.590.15
Latanoprost 0.005%0.70-0.18
Travoprost 0.004%0.48-0.07

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Conjunctival Hyperemia Scores at Month 3

Change from baseline in mean conjunctival hyperemia scores at month 3. Hyperemia is engorgement of the blood vessels (redness) of the bulbar conjunctiva of the eye (the clear membrane covering the white surface of the eye). Hyperemia was graded using a 5-point scale in which 0=no redness and +3=deep, diffuse redness. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT00539526)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,,
InterventionScores on Scale (Mean)
BaselineMonth 3
Bimatoprost 0.03%0.740.05
Latanoprost 0.005%0.740.06
Travoprost 0.004%0.860.07

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) at Month 3

Change from baseline in TBUT at month 3. TBUT is defined as the time (seconds) required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A positive number change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT00539526)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,,
InterventionSeconds (Mean)
BaselineMonth 3
Bimatoprost 0.03%9.10.5
Latanoprost 0.005%8.60.4
Travoprost 0.004%7.91.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12

Change from Baseline in mean diurnal IOP. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Mean diurnal IOP is the average of the IOP values of both eyes at each time point measured at 8AM, 12PM and 4PM. For each eye, the IOP was either the average of the 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the median of the 3 measurements. A negative number change from Baseline indicated a reduction in IOP. (NCT00541242)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12
Bimatoprost 0.03% Eye Drops21.90-5.64
Latanoprost 0.005% Eye Drops22.16-4.89

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 18

Change from Baseline in mean diurnal IOP. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Mean diurnal IOP is the average of the IOP values of both eyes at each time point measured at 8AM, 12PM and 4PM. For each eye, the IOP was either the average of the 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the median of the 3 measurements. A negative number change from Baseline indicated a reduction in IOP. (NCT00541242)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 18

,
Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineWeek 18
Bimatoprost 0.03% Eye Drops21.90-5.77
Latanoprost 0.005% Eye Drops22.16-5.09

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Ocular Adverse Events (AEs): Stage I

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Ocular AEs were the events which were localized in the ocular region. (NCT00572455)
Timeframe: Stage I: Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study medication (up to 44 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Taprenepag 0.0025% (Stage I)1
Taprenepag 0.005% (Stage I)2
Taprenepag 0.01% (Stage I)0
Taprenepag 0.015% (Stage I)5
Taprenepag 0.02% (Stage I)4
Taprenepag 0.03% (Stage I)9
Taprenepag Vehicle (Stage I)3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Ocular Adverse Events (AEs): Stage II

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Ocular AEs were the events which were localized in the ocular region. (NCT00572455)
Timeframe: Stage II: Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study medication (up to 59 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Latanoprost Vehicle and Taprenepag 0.005% (Stage II)17
Latanoprost Vehicle and Taprenepag 0.01% (Stage II)20
Latanoprost Vehicle and Taprenepag 0.015% (Stage II)27
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag 0.005% (Stage II)24
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag 0.01% (Stage II)26
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag 0.015% (Stage II)26
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag Vehicle (Stage II)14

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching and Maintaining Target Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP): Stage I

Percentage of participants who reached an IOP of less than or equal to (<=) 18 mmHg by post-eligibility visit (Day 1) and maintained an IOP <= 18 mm Hg across all post-eligibility visits in Stage I were reported. IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometer. (NCT00572455)
Timeframe: Stage I: Day 1 up to Day 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Taprenepag 0.0025% (Stage I)0.0
Taprenepag 0.005% (Stage I)11.1
Taprenepag 0.01% (Stage I)11.1
Taprenepag 0.015% (Stage I)0.0
Taprenepag 0.02% (Stage I)11.1
Taprenepag 0.03% (Stage I)22.2
Taprenepag Vehicle (Stage I)0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 1 (8 AM), 7 (8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, 4 PM), 14 (8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, 4 PM) and Day 28 (8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, 4 PM): Stage II

IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometer. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading at 2 eligibility visits was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as the study eye. IOP was measured twice in the same eye, and if the difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 mmHg, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change at various post-dose time points was calculated from the baseline values at same time points on Day 0 (for example, value at 8 AM on Day 0 was used as baseline value for 8 AM value on Day 1, 7, 14 and 28). (NCT00572455)
Timeframe: Stage II: 8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, and 4 PM on Day 0 (Baseline), 8 AM on Day 1; 8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, 4 PM on Days 7, 14, and 28

,,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day 0: Baseline for Day 1: 8AMDay 0: Baseline for Day 7,14,28: 8AMDay 0: Baseline for Day 7: 10AMDay 0: Baseline for Day 7: 1PMDay 0: Baseline for Day 7: 4PMDay 0: Baseline for Day 14: 10AMDay 0: Baseline for Day 14: 1PMDay 0: Baseline for Day 14: 4PMDay 0: Baseline for Day 28: 10AMDay 0: Baseline for Day 28: 1PMDay 0: Baseline for Day 28: 4PMChange at Day 1: 8AMChange at Day 7: 8AMChange at Day 7: 10AMChange at Day 7: 1PMChange at Day 7: 4PMChange at Day 14: 8AMChange at Day 14: 10AMChange at Day 14: 1PMChange at Day 14: 4PMChange at Day 28: 8AMChange at Day 28: 10AMChange at Day 28: 1PMChange at Day 28: 4PM
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag 0.005% (Stage II)29.1029.0327.1326.0425.9226.9425.9225.9927.0625.9826.009.7210.209.198.028.279.507.957.037.339.928.687.516.94
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag 0.01% (Stage II)28.6328.6326.4225.3425.3526.4225.3425.3526.4225.3425.359.8711.229.618.548.4410.949.768.838.3610.669.558.668.23
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag 0.015% (Stage II)29.1929.1927.4826.2726.1227.4126.2126.2027.4126.2126.209.4910.9110.149.178.5510.529.568.867.9510.209.748.827.64
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag Vehicle (Stage II)28.5528.6026.7025.9925.8426.7025.9925.8426.7025.9925.848.168.507.606.696.148.947.307.166.307.917.066.665.79
Latanoprost Vehicle and Taprenepag 0.005% (Stage II)27.3427.5925.7424.8524.8325.7024.8424.8725.7024.8424.878.229.248.477.607.578.747.896.897.467.997.786.547.09
Latanoprost Vehicle and Taprenepag 0.01% (Stage II)28.2128.1626.4425.6725.5926.4425.6725.5926.4425.6725.596.298.767.496.996.928.606.836.336.248.407.006.476.51
Latanoprost Vehicle and Taprenepag 0.015% (Stage II)28.2728.2726.7026.1925.8726.6626.1325.8626.6626.1325.867.668.598.107.467.608.557.227.177.558.006.927.076.74

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: Stage I

Diurnal IOP was defined as the mean IOP over 24 hours. IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometer. IOP was measured in both the eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading at the 2 eligibility visits was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both the measurements were equal, right eye was selected as the study eye. IOP was measured twice in the same eye, and if the difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline = diurnal IOP at baseline - diurnal IOP at Day 14. (NCT00572455)
Timeframe: Stage I: Baseline, Day 14

,,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 14
Taprenepag 0.0025% (Stage I)25.973.65
Taprenepag 0.005% (Stage I)26.255.40
Taprenepag 0.01% (Stage I)25.907.18
Taprenepag 0.015% (Stage I)26.446.48
Taprenepag 0.02% (Stage I)28.106.00
Taprenepag 0.03% (Stage I)26.266.69
Taprenepag Vehicle (Stage I)26.040.64

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 28: Stage II

Diurnal IOP was defined as the mean IOP over 24 hours. IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometer. IOP was measured in both the eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading at the 2 eligibility visits was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both the measurements were equal, right eye was selected as the study eye. IOP was measured twice in the same eye, and if the difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 mmHg, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline = diurnal IOP at baseline - diurnal IOP at Day 28. (NCT00572455)
Timeframe: Stage II: Baseline, Day 28

,,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 28
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag 0.005% (Stage II)26.988.29
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag 0.01% (Stage II)26.369.10
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag 0.015% (Stage II)27.348.78
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag Vehicle (Stage II)26.816.74
Latanoprost Vehicle and Taprenepag 0.005% (Stage II)25.757.35
Latanoprost Vehicle and Taprenepag 0.01% (Stage II)26.477.05
Latanoprost Vehicle and Taprenepag 0.015% (Stage II)26.697.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 1 (8 AM), 7 and 14 (8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, 4 PM): Stage I

IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometer. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading at 2 eligibility visits was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as the study eye. IOP was measured twice in the same eye, and if the difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 mmHg, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change at various post-dose time points was calculated from the baseline values at same time points on Day 0 (for example, value at 8 AM on Day 0 was used as baseline value for 8 AM value on Day 1, 7 and 14). (NCT00572455)
Timeframe: Stage I: 8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, 4 PM on Day 0 (Baseline), 8 AM on Day 1, 8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, 4 PM on Day 7, and 14

,,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day0: Baseline for Day 1, 7, 14 8 AMDay 0: Baseline for Day 7 10 AMDay 0: Baseline for Day 7 1 PMDay 0: Baseline for Day 7 4 PMDay 0:Baseline for Day 14 10 AMDay 0:Baseline for Day 14 1 PMDay 0:Baseline for Day 14 4 PMChange at Day 1 8 AMChange at Day 7 8 AMChange at Day 7 10 AMChange at Day 7 1 PMChange at Day 7 4 PMChange at Day 14 8 AMChange at Day 14 10 AMChange at Day 14 1 PMChange at Day 14 4 PM
Taprenepag 0.0025% (Stage I)27.7824.7525.8325.5024.7525.8325.504.894.563.584.674.333.443.864.562.72
Taprenepag 0.005% (Stage I)27.7226.1126.0625.1126.1126.0625.115.446.677.006.225.066.116.335.223.94
Taprenepag 0.01% (Stage I)27.7225.9425.0824.8625.9425.0824.867.728.287.567.867.258.447.676.536.08
Taprenepag 0.015% (Stage I)28.4526.3025.1025.9026.3025.1025.906.758.207.157.558.957.706.405.506.30
Taprenepag 0.02% (Stage I)29.8126.5327.1326.4127.4428.0327.117.759.586.166.505.536.865.565.146.44
Taprenepag 0.03% (Stage I)28.4426.1625.6925.2826.1625.6925.287.227.678.727.446.668.288.097.196.22
Taprenepag Vehicle (Stage I)28.1525.1325.5225.3525.1325.5225.351.352.15-0.331.90-0.231.560.670.060.27

[back to top]

Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye: Stage II

IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometer. IOP was measured in both the eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading at the 2 eligibility visits was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both the measurements were equal, right eye was selected as the study eye. IOP was measured twice in the same eye, and if the difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 mmHg, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. (NCT00572455)
Timeframe: Stage II: 8 AM on Day 1; 8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, 4 PM on Days 7, 14, and 28

,,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day 1: 8 AMDay 7: 8 AMDay 7: 10 AMDay 7: 1 PMDay 7: 4 PMDay 14: 8 AMDay 14: 10 AMDay 14: 1 PMDay 14: 4 PMDay 28: 8 AMDay 28: 10 AMDay 28: 1 PMDay 28: 4 PM
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag 0.005% (Stage II)19.3918.8317.9418.0217.6519.5318.9818.8918.6619.1118.3818.4719.06
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag 0.01% (Stage II)18.7617.4116.8016.8016.9117.6916.6616.5216.9817.9716.8616.6817.12
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag 0.015% (Stage II)19.6918.2817.3417.0917.5618.6717.8517.3518.2618.9917.6717.3918.56
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag Vehicle (Stage II)20.3920.1019.1019.3019.7019.6619.4018.8319.5420.6919.6419.3320.06
Latanoprost Vehicle and Taprenepag 0.005% (Stage II)19.1218.3417.2617.2517.2618.8517.8117.9417.4119.6017.9318.3017.79
Latanoprost Vehicle and Taprenepag 0.01% (Stage II)21.9119.4018.9618.6818.6719.5619.6119.3319.3519.7619.4419.1919.08
Latanoprost Vehicle and Taprenepag 0.015% (Stage II)20.6119.6818.6118.7318.2719.7219.4418.9618.3120.2819.7419.0619.13

[back to top]

Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye: Stage I

IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometer. IOP was measured in both the eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading at the 2 eligibility visits was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both the measurements were equal, right eye was selected as the study eye. IOP was measured twice in the same eye, and if the difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 mmHg, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. (NCT00572455)
Timeframe: Stage I: 8 ante meridiem (AM) on Day 1, 8 AM, 10 AM, 1 post meridiem (PM), 4 PM on Day 7, and 14

,,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day 1: 8 AMDay 7: 8 AMDay 7: 10 AMDay 7: 1 PMDay 7: 4 PMDay 14: 8 AMDay 14: 10 AMDay 14: 1 PMDay 14: 4 PM
Taprenepag 0.0025% (Stage I)22.8923.2221.1721.1721.1724.3320.8921.2822.78
Taprenepag 0.005% (Stage I)22.2821.0619.1119.8320.0621.6119.7820.8321.17
Taprenepag 0.01% (Stage I)20.0019.4418.3917.2217.6119.2818.2818.5618.78
Taprenepag 0.015% (Stage I)21.7020.2519.1517.5516.9520.7519.9019.6019.60
Taprenepag 0.02% (Stage I)22.0620.2220.3820.6320.8822.9421.8922.8920.67
Taprenepag 0.03% (Stage I)21.2220.7817.4418.2518.6320.1718.0618.5019.06
Taprenepag Vehicle (Stage I)26.7926.0025.4623.6325.5826.5824.4625.4625.08

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching and Maintaining Target Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP): Stage II

Percentage of participants who reached an IOP <= 18 mmHg by post-eligibility visit (Day 1) and maintained an IOP <= 18 mm Hg across all post-eligibility visits in Stage II were reported. IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometer. (NCT00572455)
Timeframe: Stage II: Day 1 up to Day 28

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Latanoprost Vehicle and Taprenepag 0.005% (Stage II)22.9
Latanoprost Vehicle and Taprenepag 0.01% (Stage II)2.8
Latanoprost Vehicle and Taprenepag 0.015% (Stage II)13.9
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag 0.005% (Stage II)8.3
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag 0.01% (Stage II)38.9
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag 0.015% (Stage II)16.7
Latanoprost 0.005% and Taprenepag Vehicle (Stage II)5.7

[back to top]

Outflow Facility

outflow facility was calculated using fluorophotometry and tonography (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
InterventionµL/min per mm Hg (Mean)
day time fluorophotometrydaytime tonographynight tonography
Dorzolamide0.210.200.18
Latanoprost0.230.220.21
Timolol0.230.180.17

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure

Intra-ocular Pressure was measured by applanation tonometry (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
DaytimeNight time
Dorzolamide20.217.6
Latanoprost17.617.0
Timolol16.417.1

[back to top]

Central Corneal Thickness

central corneal thickness was measured by ultrasound pachymetry (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
Interventionμm (Mean)
day timenight time
Dorzolamide564582
Latanoprost564585
Timolol568586

[back to top]

Blood Pressure

blood pressure was measured by sphygmomanometry (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
systolic day timesystolic night timediastolic day timediastolic night time
Dorzolamide1391388382
Latanoprost1361437883
Timolol1381368179

[back to top]

Aqueous Flow

aqueous flow measurements was calculated using fluorophotometry measurements. (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
InterventionμL/min (Mean)
day timenight time
Dorzolamide1.751.1
Latanoprost2.091.1
Timolol1.571.1

[back to top]

Episcleral Venous Pressure

Episcleral venous pressure was measured by venomenometry (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Latanoprost9.4
Timolol9.6
Dorzolamide9.4

[back to top]

Anterior Chamber Volume

Anterior chamber volume was measured by A-scan ultrasound biometry, daytime (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionμL (Mean)
Latanoprost191
Timolol191
Dorzolamide198

[back to top]

Uvescleral Outflow

uvescleral outflow was calulated using goldmann equation (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
InterventionµL/min per mm Hg (Mean)
day time fluorophotometrydaytime tonographynight tonography
Dorzolamide0.140.580.12
Latanoprost0.430.900.26
Timolol-0.160.700.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye on Day 28

Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer. Diurnal IOP, defined as the mean IOP over the day based on values obtained at 8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, and 4 PM, was calculated for each visit. Both eyes were tested, with the right eye preceding the left eye. The operator initially set the dial at 10 mmHg, then looked through the slit lamp and adjusted the dial to take the reading, and then recorded the results. The procedure was repeated on the same eye twice consecutively. If the measurements were within 2 mmHg or less of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the 2 readings were more than 2 mmHg of each other, a third (consecutive) reading was taken and the median (middle) IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. (NCT00595101)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionmmHg (milimeters of mercury) (Mean)
PF-0318 0.006%-5.12
PF-0318 0.024%-5.94
PF-0318 0.04%-5.02
0.005% Latanoprost-5.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Specific Time Points on Day 14 and Day 28

Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer. Both eyes were tested, with the right eye preceding the left eye. The operator initially set the dial at 10 mmHg, then looked through the slit lamp and adjusted the dial to take the reading, and then recorded the results. The procedure was repeated on the same eye twice consecutively. If the measurements were within 2 mmHg or less of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the 2 readings were more than 2 mmHg of each other, a third (consecutive) reading was taken and the median (middle) IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. (NCT00595101)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, Day 28

,,,
InterventionmmHg (milimeters of mercury) (Mean)
Day 14, 9amDay 28, 9amDay 28, 11amDay 28, 2pmDay 28, 5pm
0.005% Latanoprost-5.53-5.33-5.65-5.27-4.73
PF-0318 0.006%-5.20-5.63-5.61-4.57-4.68
PF-0318 0.024%-5.87-6.11-6.07-5.28-6.28
PF-0318 0.04%-4.35-5.19-5.46-4.85-4.57

[back to top]

Target IOP

Percentage of participants with IOP of 18 mmHg or Lower, 16 mmHg or Lower, or 14 mmHg or Lower at Any Visit Through Day 28. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer. Both eyes were tested, with the right eye preceding the left eye. The operator initially set the dial at 10 mmHg, then looked through the slit lamp and adjusted the dial to take the reading, and then recorded the results. The procedure was repeated on the same eye twice consecutively. If the measurements were within 2 mmHg or less of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the 2 readings were more than 2 mmHg of each other, a third (consecutive) reading was taken and the median (middle) IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. (NCT00595101)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
18 mmHg or lower16 mmHg or lower14 mmHg or lower
0.005% Latanoprost932
PF-0318 0.006%940
PF-0318 0.024%1121
PF-0318 0.04%1330

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score = 0

The corneal surface was assessed by the investigator and graded on a scale of 0-3, where 0 = Absent (no staining present) and 3 = Severe (>50% coverage). Percentage of patients with score = 0 at 90 days was calculated by dividing the number of patients with score = 0 by the total number of patients analyzed. (NCT00690794)
Timeframe: Day 90

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Travoprost37.1
Latanoprost40.0

[back to top]

Mean Change at Day 90 From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score

The OSDI is a 12-question validated questionnaire (resultant overall 0-100 point score) used to measure ocular symptoms, visual function and environmental factors that may affect a patient's vision, where 0 = normal and 100 = severe. The OSDI questionnaire was administered at both visits and completed by the patient with no assistance from the office staff, physician, or anyone else. The baseline OSDI score was subtracted from the 90-day OSDI score and reported as change. A negative number represents a perceived improvement in ocular health. (NCT00690794)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 90

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Travoprost-11.3
Latanoprost-11.4

[back to top]

The Extent of Latanoprost, Bimatoprost and Travoprost Induced Periocular Skin Hyperpigmentation Over a One Year Time Course in Newly Diagnosed Primary Open Angle and Ocular Hypertension Patients.

"Periocular skin color was measured with the Minolta Chroma Meter CR-400 and the L*a*b* system, also known as Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. This is a well-accepted unit of measurement in which L* corresponds to brightness and a* and b* correspond to chromaticity.~Measurements were taken at baseline and 1 year. Data from each time point and each location (upper and lower eyelids or cheeks/face) were averaged, and subtracted from the baseline value for that location. Six predetermined areas on and around the upper and lower eyelid and 2 areas of the face/cheek were measured.Upper and lower eyelid values were averaged and reported as single value for each location ie;-upper eyelids, lower eyelid and cheek/face. A decrease in luminance indicates increased pigmentation at the site of measurement." (NCT00705757)
Timeframe: one year

,,
InterventionL*a*b* (Mean)
Upper LidLower LidCheek/Face
Lumigan-0.90-0.370.30
Travatan-0.900.170.51
Xalatan-1.420.480.55

[back to top]

Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Tear Film Break Up Time (TBUT)

Tear film break-up time was assessed by the same examiner both visits using the same slitlamp/settings. Examiner instilled fluorescein onto the patient's eye, after which the patient blinked several times, then kept the eye open. Immediately thereafter, the examiner used a stopwatch to time the occurrence of the first break in the fluorescein film. Three consecutive measurements were taken and averaged for actual TBUT. TBUT at Baseline (Day 0) was subtracted from TBUT at 12 weeks (Day 84) and reported as change. A higher number represents a lengthening in the tear film break up time. (NCT00708422)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (Day 84)

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Travoprost0.8
Latanoprost1.1

[back to top]

Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score

The OSDI is a 12-question validated questionnaire (resultant overall 0-100 score) used to measure ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors that may affect a patient's vision, where 0 = normal and 100 = severe. The OSDI questionnaire was administered at both visits and completed by the patient with no assistance from the office staff, physician, or anyone else. The baseline OSDI score was subtracted from the 12-week OSDI score and reported as change. A negative number represents a perceived improvement in ocular health. (NCT00708422)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (Day 84)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Travoprost-0.0
Latanoprost-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bilateral Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at One Year

Change from baseline in bilateral (both eyes) IOP at the 1 year follow-up visit. IOP is a measure of the fluid pressure inside the eye. The bilateral IOP was calculated as an average between both eye's IOP. A negative number change from baseline indicates reduction in IOP (improvement). (NCT00716742)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 Year

,,
InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at 1 Year
Lumigan®20.8-4.8
Travatan®20.3-4.3
Xalatan®20.6-4.3

[back to top]

Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 12 (Observed)

Calculated as Baseline IOP minus Week 12 IOP (observed). IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Timolol6.96
Latanoprost7.75

[back to top]

Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 12, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

Calculated as Baseline IOP minus Week 12 IOP, LOCF. IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were less than or equal to (≤) 2 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Timolol5.72
Latanoprost7.18

[back to top]

Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 4

Calculated as Baseline IOP minus Week 4 IOP (observed). IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Timolol5.37
Latanoprost6.99

[back to top]

Mean IOP at Week 12

IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Timolol19.8
Latanoprost19.2

[back to top]

Mean IOP at Baseline

IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Timolol27.8
Latanoprost27.3

[back to top]

Mean IOP at Week 1

IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Week 1

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Timolol21.7
Latanoprost20.6

[back to top]

Mean IOP at Week 4

IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Timolol21.5
Latanoprost20.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 15% IOP Reduction From Baseline at Both Weeks 4 and 12

Participants with ≥15% IOP reduction from baseline at both Week 4 and Week 12. Calculated as (post baseline IOP minus baseline IOP) divided by IOP, multiplied by 100%. IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Timolol52
Latanoprost60

[back to top]

Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 1

Calculated as Baseline IOP minus Week 1 IOP (observed). IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Timolol6.02
Latanoprost6.70

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 AM at Week 6

Mean IOP at 8 AM at week 6. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. (NCT00735449)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Combigan®17.3
Timolol Maleate 0.5%17.8

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events

Number of subjects with adverse events, defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, during the study (reported through the week 12 visit). (NCT00735449)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Combigan®15
Timolol Maleate 0.5%13

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 10 AM at Week 12

Mean IOP at 10 AM at week 12. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure in the eye. (NCT00735449)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Combigan®15.1
Timolol Maleate 0.5%16.9

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 10 AM at Week 6

Mean IOP at 10 AM at week 6. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. (NCT00735449)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Combigan®15.9
Timolol Maleate 0.5%16.7

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 AM at Week 12

Mean IOP at 8 AM at week 12. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. (NCT00735449)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Combigan®17.0
Timolol Maleate 0.5%17.7

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure, 8 AM, at 3 Months

Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A negative number indicated a reduction in intraocular pressure. (NCT00759941)
Timeframe: Day 0, 3 months

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Xalatan + Azopt-3.13
Xalatan + Placebo-2.57

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure, 12 PM, at 3 Months

Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A negative number indicated a reduction in intraocular pressure. (NCT00759941)
Timeframe: Day 0, 3 months

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Xalatan + Azopt-3.30
Xalatan + Placebo-2.48

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure, 4 PM, at 3 Months

Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A negative number indicated a reduction in intraocular pressure. (NCT00759941)
Timeframe: Day 0, 3 months

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Xalatan + Azopt-3.00
Xalatan + Placebo-2.33

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure, Diurnal, at 3 Months

Diurnal intraocular pressure is the mean of the three timepoints measured (8AM, 12PM & 4PM). Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A negative number indicated a reduction in mean intraocular pressure. (NCT00759941)
Timeframe: Day 0, 3 months

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Xalatan + Azopt-3.20
Xalatan + Placebo-2.48

[back to top]

Mean Change at Day 90 From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score

The OSDI is a 12-question validated questionnaire (resultant overall 0-100 score) used to measure ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors that may affect a patient's vision, where 0 = normal and 100 = severe. The OSDI questionnaire was administered at both visits and completed by the patient with no assistance from the office staff, physician, or anyone else. A negative number represents a perceived improvement in ocular health. (NCT00761319)
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 90

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Travoprost-9.1
Latanoprost-10.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score = 0

The corneal surface was assessed by the investigator and graded on a scale of 0-3, where 0 = Absent (no staining present) and 3 = Severe (>50% coverage). Percentage of patients with score = 0 at 90 days was calculated by dividing the number of patients with score = 0 by tht total number of patients analyzed. (NCT00761319)
Timeframe: Day 90

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Travoprost37.6
Latanoprost38.7

[back to top]

Change in Tear Break up Time (TBUT)

Difference of tear break up time (in seconds, average of 3 measurements) at one and two months after enrollment. (NCT00798694)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months

,
Interventionseconds (Mean)
1 month2 months
Currently on Xalatan-0.590.27
New to Meds-0.86-2.00

[back to top]

Conjunctival Hyperemia Score

Conjunctival hyperemia is the amount of redness on the white part of the eye. A total score was obtained by the sum of assessments in 6 areas of each eye are which are scored from 0 to 3 (0 = no redness; 3 = severe redness), then summed per eye for a total score range of 0-18 (0 = no redness; 18 = severe redness). (NCT00798694)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline1 month2 months
Group 1 Travatan Z4.64.65.3
Group 1 Xalatan4.04.04.0
Group 2 Travatan Z3.64.84.0
Group 2 Xalatan3.23.43.3

[back to top]

Corneal Staining Score

Corneal staining is an indication of the amount of dryness of the cornea (front clear part of the eye). A total score was obtained by the sum of assessments in five areas of each eye which are scored from 0 to 3 (0 = no dryness; 3 = severe dryness), then summed per eye for a total score range of 0-15 (0 = no dryness; 15 = severe dryness). (NCT00798694)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline1 month2 months
Group 1 Travatan Z0.80.81.3
Group 1 Xalatan0.70.71.0
Group 2 Travatan Z1.01.21.0
Group 2 Xalatan1.01.31.0

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure

Intraocular pressure (the fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured two times in each eye using the Goldman applanation tonometer and averaged. (NCT00798694)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline1 month2 months
Group 1 Travatan Z20.115.515.2
Group 1 Xalatan20.915.614.6
Group 2 Travatan Z15.014.514.3
Group 2 Xalatan14.815.114.6

[back to top]

Ocular Surface Disease Index Score

Ocular Surface Disease Index Scores (OSDI) were obtained from a 12-item validated OSDI questionnaire completed by each participant. This is an assessment related to eye comfort. Each question's score ranges from 0 = no disability to 4 = greatest disability. The total score is multiplied by 25 then divided by the number of questions answered then matched to a grid ranging from 0 to 100 with 0 having symptoms reported none of the time versus 100 having disability symptoms reported all of the time. (NCT00798694)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline1 month2 months
Group 1 Travatan Z11.711.711.8
Group 1 Xalatan10.810.811.1
Group 2 Travatan Z14.28.111.2
Group 2 Xalatan9.87.06.6

[back to top]

Tear Production

Tear production, measured by Schirmer test in millimeters (NCT00798694)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months

,
Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Baseline1 month2 months
Group 1 (New to Meds)22.421.123.0
Group 2 (Currently on Xalatan)17.117.417.4

[back to top]

Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT)

Tear film break-up time was assessed by the same examiner both visits using the same slitlamp/settings. Examiner instilled fluorescein onto the patient's eye, after which the patient blinked several times, then kept the eye open. Immediately thereafter, the examiner used a stopwatch to time the occurrence of the first break in the fluorescein film. Three consecutive measurements were taken and averaged for actual TBUT. TBUT at Baseline (Day 0) was subtracted from TBUT at 12 weeks (Day 84) and reported as change. A higher number represents a lengthening in the tear film break up time. (NCT00798759)
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 84

InterventionSeconds (Mean)
Travoprost0.7
Latanoprost0.6

[back to top]

Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score

The OSDI is a 12-question validated questionnaire (resultant overall 0-100 score) used to measure ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors that may affect a patient's vision, where 0 = normal and 100 = severe. The OSDI questionnaire was administered at both visits and completed by the patient with no assistance from the office staff, physician, or anyone else. The baseline OSDI score was subtracted from the 12-week OSDI score and reported as change. A negative number represents a perceived improvement in ocular health. (NCT00798759)
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 84

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Travoprost-1.9
Latanoprost0.6

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12

Mean IOP at week 12. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. (NCT00811564)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mm Hg) (Mean)
Fixed Combination of Brimonidine Tartrate 0.2%/Timolol Maleate17.75
Latanoprost 0.005% Ophthalmic Solution17.90

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 4 PM (8 Hours)

IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8, Day 14 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 visit was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as study eye. IOP was measured twice in same eye, and if difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline in IOP = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change was calculated using the value at 4 PM on Day -8 as baseline for 4 PM value on Day 14. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 4 PM on Baseline (Day -8), 4 PM on Day 14 (8 Hours)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day -8): 4 PMChange at Day 14: 4 PM
Taprenepag+Latanoprost18.565.79
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle17.684.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 6 PM (10 Hours)

IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8, Day 14 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 visit was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as study eye. IOP was measured twice in same eye, and if difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline in IOP = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change was calculated using the value at 6 PM on Day -8 as baseline for 6 PM value on Day 14. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 6 PM on Baseline (Day -8), 6 PM on Day 14 (10 Hours)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day -8): 6 PMChange at Day 14: 6 PM
Taprenepag+Latanoprost19.106.42
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle17.293.95

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 8 Ante Meridiem (AM) (0 Hour)

IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8, Day 14 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 visit was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as study eye. IOP was measured twice in same eye, and if difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline in IOP = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change was calculated using the value at 8 AM on Day -8 as baseline for 8 AM value on Day 14. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 8 AM on Baseline (Day -8), 8 AM on Day 14 (0 Hour)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day -8) : 8 AMChange at Day 14: 8 AM
Taprenepag+Latanoprost22.775.00
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle22.413.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 8 PM (12 Hours)

IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8, Day 14 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit. IOP was measured in both the eyes, and eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 visit was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as study eye. IOP was measured twice in same eye, and if difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline in IOP = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change was calculated using the value at 8 PM on Day -8 as baseline for 8 PM value on Day 14. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 8 PM on Baseline (Day -8), 8 PM on Day 14 (12 Hours)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day -8) for Day 14 : 8 PMChange at Day 14: 8 PM
Taprenepag+Latanoprost18.586.44
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle16.663.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 15: 4 AM (20 Hours)

IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit, Day -7 and Day 15. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as study eye. IOP was measured twice in the same eye, and if difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), mean of 2 readings was recorded as IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline in IOP = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change was calculated using the value at 4 AM on Day -7 as baseline for 4 AM value on Day 15. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 4 AM on Baseline (Day -7), 4 AM on Day 15 (20 Hours)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day -7) : 4 AMChange at Day 15: 4 AM
Taprenepag+Latanoprost16.774.31
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle16.664.39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 15: 6 AM (22 Hours)

IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit, Day -7 and Day 15. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as study eye. IOP was measured twice in the same eye, and if difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), mean of 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline in IOP = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change was calculated using the value at 6 AM on Day -7 as baseline for 6 AM value on Day 15. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 6 AM on Baseline (Day -7), 6 AM on Day 15 (22 Hours)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day -7): 6 AMChange at Day 15: 6 AM
Taprenepag+Latanoprost17.985.02
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle17.364.32

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 15: 8 AM (24 Hours)

IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit, Day -7 and Day 15. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as study eye. IOP was measured twice in the same eye, and if difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), mean of 2 readings was recorded as IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline in IOP = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change was calculated using the value at 8 AM on Day -7 as baseline for 8 AM value on Day 15. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 8 AM on Baseline (Day -7), 8 AM on Day 15 (24 Hours)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day -7): 8 AMChange at Day 15: 8 AM
Taprenepag+Latanoprost23.316.19
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle22.714.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Corneal Staining Score at Day 7, 13, 16, 21, 28 and 35

Corneal staining was assessed using fluorescein dye, a yellow filter, and a slit lamp. The cornea was divided into 5 different zones. Each corneal zone was graded independently using a 0 to 3 grading scale; where 0= no staining, 1= scattered micropunctate staining (dots were discrete and countable), 2= areas of clustered micropunctate or one macropunctate stain, 3= areas of confluent micropunctate stain or two or more macropunctate stain or filaments. Sum of scores of each zone led to total score. Total score range: 0 to 15, higher score indicated greater staining. Total corneal score from both study eye and fellow eye were reported. Study eye: IOP was measured in both the eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and baseline visit was referred as 'study eye'. If both the measurements were equal, right eye was selected as the study eye. The other eye was referred as 'fellow eye'. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 8 AM Day 1 (Baseline), Day 7, 13, 16, 21, 28, 35

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change at Day 7 8 AM: study eyeChange at Day 7 8 AM: fellow eyeChange at Day 13 8 AM: study eyeChange at Day 13 8 AM: fellow eyeChange at Day 16 8 AM: study eyeChange at Day 16 8 AM: fellow eyeChange at Day 21 8 AM: study eyeChange at Day 21 8 AM: fellow eyeChange at Day 28 8 AM: study eyeChange at Day 28 8 AM: fellow eyeChange at Day 35 8 AM: study eyeChange at Day 35 8 AM: fellow eye
Taprenepag+Latanoprost0.60.50.90.90.70.80.40.40.10.1-0.0-0.0
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle0.30.41.01.01.10.90.40.20.30.00.00.0

[back to top]

Diastolic Ocular Perfusion Pressure (DOPP)

DOPP = diastolic blood pressure minus IOP of the study eye. IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8, Day 14 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit and Day 15. IOP was measured in both the eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both the measurements were equal, right eye was selected as the study eye. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 8 AM, 10 AM, 12 PM, 2 PM, 4 PM, 6 PM, 8 PM, 10 PM on Day 14; 12 AM, 4 AM, 6 AM, 8 AM on Day 15

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day 14: 8AMDay 14: 10AMDay 14: 12PMDay 14: 2PMDay 14: 4PMDay 14: 6PMDay 14: 8PMDay 14: 10PMDay 15: 12AMDay 15: 4AMDay 15: 6AMDay 15: 8AM
Taprenepag+Latanoprost57.4248.2852.7049.7356.7359.3858.1851.5751.1054.2554.0857.32
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle57.4848.2952.8452.5256.7560.4155.9849.8653.5254.0053.9058.47

[back to top]

Maximum Conjunctival Hyperemia Score

Conjunctival hyperemia score was assessed using slit-lamp examination on a photographic reference scale ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Higher score indicated severe condition. Conjunctival hyperemia was recorded to the nearest whole number using standard rounding rules (for example, a score of 1.5 was rounded up to 2 and a score of 1.4 was rounded down to 1). Highest conjunctival hyperemia score observed at Day -8 (baseline) and through Day 1 to 35 were reported. Maximum conjunctival hyperemia score for both study eye and fellow eye was reported. Study eye: IOP was measured in both the eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 was referred as 'study eye'. If both the measurements were equal, right eye was selected as the study eye. The other eye was referred as 'fellow eye'. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: Day -8 (Baseline), Day 1 to 35

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Day -8: Baseline for study eyeDay -8: Baseline for fellow eyeDay 1 to 35: study eyeDay 1 to 35: fellow eye
Taprenepag+Latanoprost0.300.301.871.77
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle0.380.281.451.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 15: 12 AM (16 Hours)

IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit, Day -7 and Day 15. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as study eye. IOP was measured twice in the same eye, and if difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), mean of 2 readings was recorded as IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline in IOP = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change was calculated using the value at 12 AM on Day -7 as baseline for 12 AM value on Day 15. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 12 AM on Baseline (Day -7), 12 AM on Day 15 (16 Hours)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day -7): 12 AMChange at Day 15: 12 AM
Taprenepag+Latanoprost17.985.71
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle16.774.34

[back to top]

Total Corneal Staining Score

Corneal staining was assessed using fluorescein dye, a yellow filter, and a slit lamp. The cornea was divided into 5 different zones. Each corneal zone was graded independently using a 0 to 3 grading scale; where 0= no staining, 1= scattered micropunctate staining (dots were discrete and countable), 2= areas of clustered micropunctate or one macropunctate stain, 3= areas of confluent micropunctate stain or two or more macropunctate stain or filaments. Sum of scores of each zone led to total score. Total score range: 0 to 15, higher score indicated greater staining. Total corneal score from both study eye and fellow eye were reported. Study eye: IOP was measured in both the eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and baseline visit was referred as 'study eye'. If both the measurements were equal, right eye was selected as the study eye. The other eye was referred as 'fellow eye'. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 8 AM on Day 1 (Baseline)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Day 1 8 AM: Baseline for study eyeDay 1 8 AM: Baseline for fellow eye
Taprenepag+Latanoprost0.10.0
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle0.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 16: 8 AM (48 Hours)

IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit and Day 16. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as study eye. IOP was measured twice in the same eye, and if difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), the mean of 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline in IOP = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change was calculated using the value at 8 AM on Day -8 as baseline for 8 AM value on Day 16. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 8 AM on Baseline (Day -8), 8 AM on Day 16 (48 Hours)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Taprenepag+Latanoprost1.21
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle-0.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 17: 8 AM (72 Hours)

IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit and Day 17. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as study eye. IOP was measured twice in the same eye, and if difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), the mean of 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline in IOP = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change was calculated using the value at 8 AM on Day -8 as baseline for 8 AM value on Day 17. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 8 AM on Baseline (Day -8), 8 AM on Day 17 (72 Hours)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Taprenepag+Latanoprost0.89
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle-0.95

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 21: 8 AM (168 Hours)

IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit and Day 21. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as study eye. IOP was measured twice in the same eye, and if difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), the mean of 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline in IOP = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change was calculated using the value at 8 AM on Day -8 as baseline for 8 AM value on Day 21. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 8 AM on Day -8 (Baseline), 8 AM on Day 21 (168 Hours)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Taprenepag+Latanoprost-0.19
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle-0.36

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Ocular and Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Number of participants with ocular (AE related to eye) and systemic (all AEs including eye) AEs were reported. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study medication (up to 58 Days)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ocular AEsSystemic AEs
Taprenepag+Latanoprost2930
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle2528

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration for PF-04217329 Active Metabolite (CP-544326) at 0.25 Hours on Day 14

(NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 0.25 hours post-dose on Day 14

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Taprenepag+Latanoprost67.23
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle88.65

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration for PF-04217329 Active Metabolite (CP-544326) at 0.5 Hours on Day 14

(NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 0.5 hours post-dose on Day 14

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Taprenepag+Latanoprost47.88
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle53.07

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration for PF-04217329 Active Metabolite (CP-544326) at 0.75 Hours on Day 14

(NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 0.75 hours post-dose on Day 14

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Taprenepag+Latanoprost31.68
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle30.74

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration for PF-04217329 Active Metabolite (CP-544326) at 1 Hour on Day 14

(NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 1 hour post-dose on Day 14

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Taprenepag+Latanoprost24.94
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle18.96

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration for PF-04217329 Active Metabolite (CP-544326) at 5 Minutes on Day 14

(NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 5 minutes post-dose on Day 14

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Taprenepag+Latanoprost36.20
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle43.27

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Corneal Endothelial Cell Counts at Day 13 and 35

Endothelial cell count was defined as the number of cells per millimeter square (cells/mm^2) of endothelium and was calculated using confocal microscopy for both study eye and fellow eye. Study eye: IOP was measured in both the eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 was referred as 'study eye'. If both the measurements were equal, right eye was selected as the study eye. The other eye was referred as 'fellow eye'. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 8 AM on Day 1 (Baseline), Day 13, 35

,
Interventioncells/mm^2 (Mean)
Day 1 8 AM: Baseline for study eyeDay 1 8 AM: Baseline for fellow eyeChange at Day 13 8 AM: study eyeChange at Day 13 8 AM: fellow eyeChange at Day 35 8 AM: study eyeChange at Day 35 8 AM: fellow eye
Taprenepag+Latanoprost2560.72456.5-41.829.5-10.6-12.6
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle2585.32519.117.2-12.1-45.3-13.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Corneal Thickness at Day 7, 13, 16, 21, 28 and 35

Corneal thickness was measured using an ultrasonic pachymeter. Corneal thickness in both study eye and fellow eye were reported. Study eye: IOP was measured in both the eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 was referred as 'study eye'. If both the measurements were equal, right eye was selected as the study eye. The other eye was referred as 'fellow eye'. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 8 AM on Day 1 (Baseline), Days 7, 13, 16, 21, 28, 35

,
Interventionmicrometer (Mean)
Day 1 8 AM: Baseline for study eyeDay 1 8 AM: Baseline for fellow eyeChange at Day 7 8 AM: study eyeChange at Day 7 8 AM: fellow eyeChange at Day 13 8 AM: study eyeChange at Day 13 8 AM: fellow eyeChange at Day 16 8 AM: study eyeChange at Day 16 8 AM: fellow eyeChange at Day 21 8 AM: study eyeChange at Day 21 8 AM: fellow eyeChange at Day 28 8 AM: study eyeChange at Day 28 8 AM: fellow eyeChange at Day 35 8 AM: study eyeChange at Day 35 8 AM: fellow eye
Taprenepag+Latanoprost562.8562.526.626.720.224.420.721.75.76.47.88.22.35.1
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle561.0560.725.026.421.224.919.722.08.910.96.99.25.45.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Ocular Perfusion Pressure (DOPP) at Day 14 (8 AM, 10 AM, 12 PM, 2 PM, 4 PM, 6 PM, 8 PM, 10 PM) and Day 15 (12 AM, 2 AM, 4 AM, 6 AM and 8 AM)

DOPP=diastolic blood pressure minus IOP of the study eye. IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8, Day 14 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit, Day -7 and Day 15. IOP was measured in both the eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both the measurements were equal, right eye was selected as the study eye. Change at various post-dose time points on Day 14 and Day 15 was calculated from the values at same time points on Day -8 and Day -7 respectively (for example, value at 8 AM on Day -8 was used as baseline value for 8 AM value on Day 14 and value at 8 AM on Day -7 was used as baseline value for 8 AM value on Day 15). (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 8 AM, 10 AM, 12 PM, 2 PM, 4 PM, 6 PM, 8 PM, and 10 PM on Day -8 (Baseline), Day 14; 12 AM, 4 AM, 6 AM, 8 AM on Day -7 (Baseline), Day 15

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day -8: Baseline for Day 14 8 AM (n=24,28)Day -8: Baseline for Day 14 10 AM(n=24,28)Day -8: Baseline for Day 14 12 PM (n=24,28)Day -8: Baseline for Day 14 2 PM (n=24,28)Day -8: Baseline for Day 14 4 PM (n=24,28)Day -8: Baseline for Day 14 6 PM (n=24,28)Day -8: Baseline for Day 14 8 PM (n=24,28)Day -8: Baseline for Day 14 10 PM (n=24,28)Day -7: Baseline for Day 15 12 AM (n=24,28)Day -7: Baseline for Day 15 4 AM (n=24,28)Day -7: Baseline for Day 15: 6 AMDay -7: Baseline for Day 15: 8 AMChange at Day 14: 8 AMChange at Day 14: 10 AMChange at Day 14: 12 PMChange at Day 14: 2 PMChange at Day 14: 4 PMChange at Day 14: 6 PMChange at Day 14: 8 PMChange at Day 14: 10 PMChange at Day 15: 12 AMChange at Day 15: 4 AMChange at Day 15: 6 AMChange at Day 15: 8 AM
Taprenepag+Latanoprost52.8146.0647.2946.7553.9853.9852.5046.5448.7351.9853.6052.945.382.776.654.153.256.006.945.733.042.851.814.23
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle53.0544.5750.3446.1352.3958.1453.7747.7949.7351.7354.3955.184.433.702.827.313.982.592.162.053.801.86-0.433.23

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Maximum Conjunctival Hyperemia Score Observed

Conjunctival hyperemia score was assessed using slit-lamp examination on a photographic reference scale ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Conjunctival hyperemia was recorded to the nearest whole number using standard rounding rules (for example, a score of 1.5 was rounded up to 2 and a score of 1.4 was rounded down to 1). Change between highest conjunctival hyperemia score observed through Day 1 to 35 and highest conjunctival hyperemia score at baseline (Day -8) was reported. Maximum conjunctival hyperemia score for both study eye and fellow eye was reported. Study eye: IOP was measured in both the eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 was referred as 'study eye'. If both the measurements were equal, right eye was selected as the study eye. The other eye was referred as 'fellow eye'. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: Day -8 (Baseline), Day 1 to 35

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change in study eyeChange in fellow eye
Taprenepag+Latanoprost1.571.47
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle1.071.10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 10 AM (2 Hours)

IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8, Day 14 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 visit was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as study eye. IOP was measured twice in same eye, and if difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury, mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline in IOP = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change was calculated using the value at 10 AM on Day -8 as baseline for 10 AM value on Day 14. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 10 AM on Baseline (Day -8), 10 AM on Day 14 (2 Hours)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day -8): 10 AMChange at Day 14: 10 AM
Taprenepag+Latanoprost21.403.90
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle20.823.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 10 PM (14 Hours)

IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8, Day 14 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 visit was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as study eye. IOP was measured twice in the same eye, and if difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), mean of 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline in IOP = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change was calculated using the value at 10 PM on Day -8 as baseline for 10 PM value on Day 14. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 10 PM on Day -8 (Baseline), 10 PM on Day 14 (14 Hours)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day -8): 10 PMChange at Day 14: 10 PM
Taprenepag+Latanoprost18.255.40
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle17.963.88

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Photophobia and Iritis

Percentage of participants with treatment emergent photophobia (abnormal sensitivity or intolerance of eye towards light) and iritis (inflammation of the iris of eye) were reported. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study medication (up to 58 Days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PhotophobiaIritis
Taprenepag+Latanoprost83.333.33
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle24.146.90

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 12 Post Meridiem (PM) (4 Hours)

IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8, Day 14 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 visit was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as study eye. IOP was measured twice in the same eye, and if difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), mean of 2 readings was recorded as IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline in IOP = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change was calculated using the value at 12 PM on Day -8 as baseline for 12 PM value on Day 14. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 12 PM on Baseline (Day -8), 12 PM on Day 14 (4 Hours)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day -8): 12 PMChange at Day 14: 12 PM
Taprenepag+Latanoprost21.545.15
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle21.454.43

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye at Day 14: 2 PM (6 Hours)

IOP was measured using Perkins applanation tonometer at Day -8, Day 14 and using standard Goldmann applanation tonometer at eligibility visit. IOP was measured in both eyes, and the eye with higher IOP reading across eligibility visit and Day -8 visit was referred as 'study eye' for efficacy assessment. If both measurements were equal, right eye was selected as study eye. IOP was measured twice in same eye, and if difference between 2 measurements was less than or equal to 2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. If the difference between 2 readings was greater than 2 mmHg, a third consecutive reading was taken and the median IOP was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Mean IOP was reported as the average of individual participants' mean or median IOP values. Change from baseline in IOP = baseline IOP - post-baseline IOP. Change was calculated using the value at 2 PM on Day -8 as baseline for 2 PM value on Day 14. (NCT00934089)
Timeframe: 2 PM on Baseline (Day -8), 2 PM on Day 14 (6 Hours)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day -8): 2 PMChange at Day 14: 2 PM
Taprenepag+Latanoprost22.256.56
Taprenepag+Latanoprost Vehicle20.803.91

[back to top]

Ocular Tolerance

Response defined as a combination of satisfactory or acceptable effect on IOP and a reduction of at least 20% of the total tolerance score in the worse eye. (NCT01155219)
Timeframe: Day 84

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Geltim LP®65
Xalatan®34

[back to top]

Blood Pressure (BP), Period 1

systolic and diastolic BP at 4 weeks after use of eyedrops (NCT01175902)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
systolic BP at 8amsystolic BP at 10amsystolic BP at 12pmsystolic BP at 16pmsystolic BP at 20pmdiastolic BP at 8amdiastolic BP at 10amdiastolic BP at 12pmdiastolic BP at 16pmdiastolic BP at 20pm
Dorzolamide/Timolol, Period 1122.82119.14120.55118.55119.4577.3673.8173.1872.8174.13
Latanoprost, Period 1121.82120.68120.45122.09123.3274.7774.5074.2275.2775.95

[back to top]

Blood Pressure (BP), Period 2

systolic and diastolic BP measured after treaemt from week 8 to week 12 (NCT01175902)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
systolic BP at 8amsystolic BP at 10amsystolic BP at 12pmsystolic BP at 16pmsystolic BP at 20pmdiastolic BP at 8amdiastolic BP at 10amdiastolic BP at 12pmdiastolic BP at 16pmdiastolic BP at 20pm
Dorzolamide/Timolol, Period 2118.41117.95119.05118.45119.8273.7272.5072.4071.3674.72
Latanoprost, Period 2123.14123.59122.41124.50123.2376.4574.8675.5473.4573.81

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP), Period 2

IOP (mean IOP) after treaemt from week 8 to week 12 (NCT01175902)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
IOP at 8amIOP at 10amIOP at 12pmIOP at 16pmIOP at 20pm
Dorzolamide/Timolol, Period 212.3612.3612.7213.0413.13
Latanoprost, Period 213.1312.8112.5412.8113.40

[back to top]

Ocular Perfusion Pressure (OPP), Period 1

"OPP was calculated according to the following formula:~OPP=(1/3 systolic BP + 2/3 diastolic BP) x 2/3 -IOP, diastolic OPP (DOPP)=diastolic BP-IOP" (NCT01175902)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
OPP at 8amOPP at 10amOPP at 12pmOPP at 16pmOPP at 20pm
Dorzolamide/Timolol, Period 149.1246.9548.1745.4446.73
Latanoprost, Period 146.5746.6546.2146.8147.79

[back to top]

OPP, Period 2

"OPP was calculated according to the following formula:~OPP=(1/3 systolic BP + 2/3 diastolic BP) x 2/3 -IOP, diastolic OPP (DOPP)=diastolic BP-IOP~OPP after treaemt from week 8 to week 12" (NCT01175902)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
OPP at 8amOPP at 10amOPP at 12pmOPP at 16pmOPP at 20pm
Dorzolamide/Timolol, Period 246.7146.0745.9044.9946.70
Latanoprost, Period 248.3648.0448.4747.8147.10

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP), Period 1

IOP (mean IOP) after 4 weeks of treatment (NCT01175902)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
IOP at 8amIOP at 10amIOP at 12pmIOP at 16pmIOP at 20pm
Dorzolamide/Timolol, Period 113.5013.3612.6313.7713.63
Latanoprost, Period 113.7213.2713.5413.7713.36

[back to top] [back to top]

Clinical Effectiveness Rate

Clinical effectiveness rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved clinical effectiveness over the total number of effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding exact 2sided 95% confidence interval. Overall effectiveness of latanoprost/timolol was determined by the investigator based on clinical symptoms and examinations. Clinical effectiveness was assessed according to the following categories: (1) effective, (2) not effective, or (3) not assessable at the end of observation period (Max 104 weeks). (NCT01191008)
Timeframe: Max 104 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Latanoprost/Timolol Maleate82.8

[back to top] [back to top]

Change in IOP at Specified Time Points (8 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM) at Visit 6 (Day 28)

The change in the observed mean study eye IOP from baseline (Visit 3, Day 1) at specified time points (8 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM) at Visit 6 (Day 28) (NCT01223378)
Timeframe: baseline and Visit 6 (Day 28)

,,,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Change from Baseline (8 am)Change from Baseline (12 pm)Change from Baseline (4 pm)
BOL-303259-X 0.006%-8.42-7.82-7.23
BOL-303259-X 0.012%-8.91-8.33-7.65
BOL-303259-X 0.024%-9.46-8.98-8.59
BOL-303259-X 0.040%-9.61-8.60-8.47
Latanoprost-8.76-7.63-6.99

[back to top]

Change in Mean Diurnal IOP at Visits 4,5, and 7

Determine the most effective drug concentration(s) of BOL-303259-X in the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) and compared to latanoprost (NCT01223378)
Timeframe: Baseline and Visit 4 (Day 7), Visit 5 (day 14), and Visit 7 (Day 29)

,,,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Visit 4 (Day 7)Visit 5 (Day 14)Visit 7 (Day 29)
BOL-303259-X 0.006%-6.850-7.607-6.188
BOL-303259-X 0.012%-7.707-7.934-6.202
BOL-303259-X 0.024%-8.230-8.859-7.177
BOL-303259-X 0.040%-8.456-8.606-6.846
Latanoprost-7.325-7.719-6.276

[back to top]

IOP

Determine the number of subjects with mean diurnal IOP NCT01223378)
Timeframe: Visit 4 (Day 7), Visit 5 (day 14), Visit 6 (Day 28) and Visit 7 (Day 29)

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 4 (Day 7)Visit 5 (Day 14)Visit 6 (Day 28)Visit 7 (Day 29)
BOL-303259-X 0.006%30344125
BOL-303259-X 0.012%37424424
BOL-303259-X 0.024%47525737
BOL-303259-X 0.040%46455125
Latanoprost29393823

[back to top]

Change in IOP at Specified Time Points (8 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM) at Visits 4, 5, and 7 (Days 7, 14, and 29)

The change in the observed mean study eye IOP from baseline (Visit 3, Day 1) at specified time points (points 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM) at Visits 4, 5, and 7 (Days 7, 14, and 29) (NCT01223378)
Timeframe: baseline and Visits 4, 5 and 7 (Days 7, 14, and 29)

,,,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Visit 4 (Day 7) (8 am)Visit 4 (Day 7) (12 pm)Visit 4 (Day 7) (4 pm)Visit 5 (Day 14) (8 am)Visit 5 (Day 14) (12 pm)Visit 5 (Day 14) (4 pm)Visit 7 (Day 29) (8 am)Visit 7 (Day 29) (12 pm)Visit 7 (Day 29) (4 pm)
BOL-303259-X 0.006%-7.203-6.665-6.684-8.270-7.500-7.053-6.969-6.039-5.575
BOL-303259-X 0.012%-8.396-7.823-6.902-8.538-8.381-6.905-6.796-6.235-5.574
BOL-303259-X 0.024%-8.667-8.247-7.778-9.569-8.700-8.310-7.675-7.119-6.738
BOL-303259-X 0.040%-8.869-8.219-8.281-9.006-8.556-8.256-7.406-6.791-6.090
Latanoprost-8.125-7.200-6.650-8.519-7.519-7.120-7.006-6.108-5.715

[back to top]

Change in Mean Diurnal IOP at Visit 6 (Day 28)

Determine the most effective drug concentration(s) of BOL-303259-X in the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) and compared to latanoprost (NCT01223378)
Timeframe: Baseline and Visit 6 (Day 28)

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
BOL-303259-X 0.006%-7.829
BOL-303259-X 0.012%-8.295
BOL-303259-X 0.024%-8.952
BOL-303259-X 0.040%-8.894
Latanoprost-7.800

[back to top]

Change From Baseline IOP

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. For each patient, the IOP is the average of the two eyes. IOP is recorded at the 08:00 (8:00 am), 12:00 (noon) and 16:00 (4:00 pm) hour time points for each patient at each visit. A negative number change from Baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement). (NCT01243567)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Baseline-08:00Baseline-12:00Baseline-16:00Change from Baseline at Month 3-08:00Change from Baseline at Month 3-12:00Change from Baseline at Month 3-16:00
Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Combination Ophthalmic Solution29.728.726.8-14.6-13.6-12.4
Latanoprost 0.005% Ophthalmic Solution29.629.026.8-12.3-11.8-10.3

[back to top]

Absolute Difference Between Patient's Highest IOP Reading at Baseline (Day 0) and the Corresponding IOP Reading

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Two or three measurements of IOP are taken for each eye at each time point. The highest IOP values between the two eyes for each patient at each time point are used to calculate the absolute difference. (NCT01243567)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineAbsolute Difference at Month 3
Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Combination Ophthalmic Solution30.4-15.3
Latanoprost 0.005% Ophthalmic Solution30.3-12.9

[back to top]

Absolute Difference Between Patient's Lowest IOP Reading at Baseline (Day 0) and the Corresponding IOP Reading

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Two or three measurements of IOP are taken for each eye at each time point. The lowest IOP values between the two eyes for each patient at each time point are used to calculate the absolute difference. (NCT01243567)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineAbsolute Difference at Month 3
Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Combination Ophthalmic Solution26.2-11.8
Latanoprost 0.005% Ophthalmic Solution26.5-9.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. For each patient, the IOP is the average of the two eyes. The average IOP is the average of the 08:00, 12:00 and 16:00 hour time points at each visit for each patient. A negative number change from Baseline indicates a reduction in average IOP (improvement). (NCT01243567)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Month 3
Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Combination Ophthalmic Solution28.4-13.5
Latanoprost 0.005% Ophthalmic Solution28.5-11.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Reaching a Predefined Target Pressure Threshold

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. For each patient, the IOP is the average of the two eyes. The predefined target pressure thresholds are at least a 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% reduction in IOP from baseline. (NCT01243567)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,
InterventionPercentage of Patients (Number)
Decrease of at Least 20%Decrease of at Least 30%Decrease of at Least 40%Decrease of at Least 50%
Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Combination Ophthalmic Solution97.790.774.446.5
Latanoprost 0.005% Ophthalmic Solution100.086.847.415.8

[back to top]

Mean Tear Break Up Time (TBUT) at Week 12

Tear Break Up Time was analyzed using the average of the readings of both eyes. TBUT is defined as the time (seconds) required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. (NCT01253902)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionSeconds (Mean)
Bimatoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.01%9.7
Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.004%9.7
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005%9.3

[back to top]

Mean Corneal Staining With Fluorescein at Week 12

Corneal staining was analyzed using the average of the scores of both eyes. The cornea is the transparent front part of the eye which covers the iris and pupil. To detect the presence or absence of corneal puncta (tiny disruptions in the surface of the eye), fluorescein dye is administered into the eye and the eye is graded using a 5-point scale where 0=None (no puncta), 0.5=Trace (1-5 puncta), 1=Mild (6-20 puncta), 2=Moderate (>20 puncta) and 3=Severe (too many puncta to count). (NCT01253902)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Bimatoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.01%0.31
Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.004%0.32
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005%0.22

[back to top]

Mean Conjunctival Hyperemia at Week 12

Conjunctival hyperemia was analyzed using the average of the scores of both eyes. Hyperemia is engorgement of the blood vessels (redness) of the bulbar conjunctiva of the eye (the clear membrane covering the white surface of the eye). Hyperemia was graded on a 5 point scale where 0=none (normal), 0.5=trace (trace flush reddish pink), 1=Mild (mild flush reddish color), 2=Moderate (bright red color) and 3=severe (deep bright diffuse redness). (NCT01253902)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Bimatoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.01%0.42
Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.004%0.46
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005%0.44

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Reaching the Target IOP (≤ 18 mmHg)

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye (study eye) was assessed. (NCT01263444)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azarga70.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 4

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. Only one eye (study eye) contributed to the mean. (NCT01263444)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Azarga-6.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. Only one eye (study eye) contributed to the mean. (NCT01263444)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Azarga-6.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP Per Prostaglandin Group at Week 12

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. Only prostaglandin subgroups with ≥ 15 patients were analyzed. Only one eye (study eye) contributed to the mean. (NCT01263444)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
AZARGA + Latanoprost (n=22)AZARGA + Travoprost (n=15)
Azarga-7.1-5.1

[back to top]

Effectiveness in Lowering Intraocular Pressure

Applanation tonometry will be used to measure patients' intraocular pressure (NCT01315574)
Timeframe: At the 6 month follow-up time point

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Latanoprost (Xalatan)13.7
Travoprost (Travatan Z)17.2

[back to top]

Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score

Corneal Fluorescein Staining score was used in this study to quantify changes in dry eye symptoms. Corneal fluorescein staining scores range from 0 to 4 points: 0=non-staining to 4 =regional whole staining of the cornea. Higher scores indicate worse eye condition. (NCT01315574)
Timeframe: At the 6 month follow-up time point

Interventionunits on a scale (1-4) (Mean)
Latanoprost (Xalatan)1
Travoprost (Travatan Z)1.5

[back to top]

Tear Film Break-Up Time

Tear Film Break-Up Time (TBUT) is a clinical test used to quantify changes in dry eye symptoms. The Tear Film Break-Up time is the number of seconds between the subjects last blink and the detection of the first dry spot in the tear film. (NCT01315574)
Timeframe: At the 6 month follow-up time point

InterventionSeconds (Mean)
Latanoprost (Xalatan)6.3
Travoprost (Travatan Z)6.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP was measured in the study eye, defined as the worse eye at Baseline. The mean diurnal IOP is the average of all the IOP measurements in the study eye taken at 8 AM, 10 AM and 4 PM at Baseline and at Week 12. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. (NCT01525173)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 12
ALPHAGAN® P and LUMIGAN®22.3-4.7
LUMIGAN® Alone22.2-4.0

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

calculated as the time from the date of baseline visit to the date in which the medical treatment will be stopped, since IOP control will be considered not satisfactory (NCT01527682)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventioneyes (Median)
Latanoprost, DorzolamideNA

[back to top]

Number of Eyes With an Adverse Event (AE)

The occurrence of the following events will be monitored: growth of the eyelashes (hypertrichosis), changes iris colour, corneal epitheliopathy, allergic conjunctivitis, increase of central corneal thickness, non-serious and serious adverse event occurrence. (NCT01527682)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventioneyes (Number)
Latanoprost, Dorzolamide61

[back to top]

Percentage of Eyes With Response

defined as those eyes in which the decrease of intraocular pressure (IOP) of at least 20% with respect to baseline assessment will be achieved and maintained during the 3-year period of study duration (NCT01527682)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventioneyes (Count of Units)
Latanoprost, Dorzolamide33

[back to top]

Variation in Episcleral Venous Pressure.

Episcleral venous pressure (mm Hg) of the eye will be determined under baseline condition and under glaucoma drug treatment. (NCT01677507)
Timeframe: 1 week treatment

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Right eyeLeft eye
Latanoprost7.77.4
Timolol7.67.3

[back to top]

Variation in Aqueous Flow Between Individuals.

Aqueous flow production (microliters/minute) will be determined under baseline condition and under glaucoma drug treatment. (NCT01677507)
Timeframe: 1 week after treatment

,
Interventionmicroliters/min (Mean)
Right eyeLeft eye
Latanoprost2.83.0
Timolol1.92.0

[back to top]

Variation in Eye Pressure Between Individuals.

Eye pressure is a steady state quantitative trait that is measured in mm Hg. Eye pressure is determined by the following physiological factors (units of measure): eye fluid or aqueous humor production (microliters/minute), aqueous humor outflow (microliters/minute), outflow resistance (microliters/minute/mm Hg) and venous pressure (mm Hg) of the eye. All of these physiological factors will be determined under baseline condition and under glaucoma drug treatment. (NCT01677507)
Timeframe: Measurement after 1 week of drug treatment

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
RIght EyesLeft Eyes
Latanoprost11.311.0
Timolol11.511.0

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean IOP across subjects within treatment group on each day at each post-treatment timepoint. IOP was measured at 0800, 1000, and 1600 hours on days 0, 14, and 28. IOP was also measured at 0800 hours on Day 7 and follow-up days 29 and 30. (NCT01731002)
Timeframe: Study treatment was administered for 28 days

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day 0, 0800 hoursDay 0, 1000 hoursDay 0, 1600 hoursDay 7, 0800 hoursDay 14, 0800 hoursDay 14, 1000 hoursDay 14, 1600 hoursDay 28, 0800 hoursDay 28, 1000 hoursDay 28, 1600 hours
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.01%27.3425.5524.4921.8921.2419.2818.9021.9519.6918.82
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02%27.1125.4124.2921.1520.8018.8818.7221.2419.5319.13
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005%26.7825.1824.5820.0319.3018.0917.8619.2418.4018.34

[back to top]

Extent of Exposure

Exposure to study medication in days for all treatment groups. (NCT01731002)
Timeframe: 28 Days

Interventiondays (Mean)
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.01%27.6
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02%26.8
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005%27.8

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean diurnal IOP across subjects within treatment group at Day 29. (NCT02057575)
Timeframe: Study treatment was administered for 28 days, and outcome measures collected on Day 29

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day 1, Diurnal MeanDay 29, Diurnal Mean
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution25.9918.44
Netarsudil (AR-13324) Ophthalmic Solution25.3519.13
PG324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.01%25.1117.33
PG324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02%25.1216.52

[back to top]

Visual Acuity

Visual Acuity was measured using the Corrected Snellen Visual Acuity method reported as the Logarithm Minimum Angle of Resoution (logMAR) change from baseline. The Snellen eye chart was used with the subject's current corrected lens prescription at a distance equivalent to 20 feet. Results from the Snellen chart were converted to the logMAR scale which is the standard tool for reporting visual acuity outcomes. (NCT02059278)
Timeframe: Baseline and 84 days

InterventionlogMAR units (Mean)
T-2345-0.003
Xalatan-0.008

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure

"Evaluation of intraocular pressure using Goldmann applanation tonometry.~Primary outcome was the between group difference in the change from baseline in IOP at each of 9 assessment points.~Equivalence was achieved if the 95% Confidence Intervals were within 1.5 mmHg at all 9 time points" (NCT02059278)
Timeframe: Measured at 8am 10 am and 4 pm at Baseline and on Days 15, 42 and 84

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Day 15 08:00Day 15 10:00Day 15 16:00Day 42 08:00Day 42 10:00Day 42 16:00Day 84 08:00Day 84 10:00Day 84 16:00
T-2345-3.0-2.7-2.3-3.0-2.7-2.3-3.0-2.7-2.2
Xalatan-3.8-3.6-3.1-3.5-3.5-3.1-3.5-3.6-2.9

[back to top]

Mean Deviation in Visual Field

Visual Field was performed using an automated perimeter according to the sites standard protocol. This test measures the angle of the visual field from the central visual axis. Visual Field Testing generates a numerical scale as its main result which shows the retinal sensitivities at the different test locations, expressed in Decibels (dB). The mean deviation in the visual field reflects the overall depression (deviation from normal values). Negative values indicate a reduction in visual field. The analysis performed is the mean change from baseline at Day 84. (NCT02059278)
Timeframe: Baseline and 84 days

,
InterventionDecibels (dB) (Mean)
Study eyeFellow eye
T-2345-0.1690.067
Xalatan-0.166-0.094

[back to top]

Ophthalmoscopy

Number of participants with eye abnormalities following ophthalmoscopy. Direct ophthalmoscopy with dilation included assessment of the optic nerve head for pallor and cupping. A dilated fundus examination consisting of the vitreous, optic nerve, macula, and peripheral retina was conducted. Results are reported as the number of subjects with clinical significant abnormalities at Day 84 that were not clinically significant at Baseline. (NCT02059278)
Timeframe: Baseline and 84 days

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Study eyeFellow eye
T-234511
Xalatan00

[back to top]

Slit Lamp Examination

Number of participants with eye abnormalities following routine slit lamp examination. The anterior segment of the eye including lids, cornea, conjunctiva, anterior chamber, iris and lens were evaluated with a routine slit lamp examination and any abnormalities observed were reported. (NCT02059278)
Timeframe: Baseline and 84 days

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
LidCorneaConjunctivaIrisLens
T-234541203
Xalatan02216

[back to top]

Decrease From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 at 2 Hours After IMP Administration

"Comparison of each group in change from baseline in intraocular pressure at Week 8 at 2 hours after IMP administration.~The number of subjects showed in the Participant Flow comes from all the subjects administered IMP. For efficacy analysis, on the other hand, several subjects were excluded from the analysis according to the statistical analysis plan. For example, subjects without IOP after administration were excluded. In addition, IOP measurement at 8 hours was not mandatory. That is why there are differences between the number in the Participant Flow and Outcome." (NCT02105272)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8 at 2 hours after IMP administration

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
OPC-1085EL Ophthalmic Solution2.1
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution1.0

[back to top]

Decrease From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 at 8 Hours After IMP Administration

"Comparison of each group in change from baseline in intraocular pressure at 8 at 8 hours after IMP administration.~The number of subjects showed in the Participant Flow comes from all the subjects administered IMP. For efficacy analysis, on the other hand, several subjects were excluded from the analysis according to the statistical analysis plan. For example, subjects without IOP after administration were excluded. In addition, IOP measurement at 8 hours was not mandatory. That is why there are differences between the number in the Participant Flow and Outcome." (NCT02105272)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8 at 8 hours after IMP administration

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
OPC-1085EL Ophthalmic Solution1.7
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution1.0

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 at 2 Hours After IMP Administration

"Comparison of each group in intraocular pressure at Week 8 at 2 hours after IMP administration.~The number of subjects showed in the Participant Flow comes from all the subjects administered IMP. For efficacy analysis, on the other hand, several subjects were excluded from the analysis according to the statistical analysis plan. For example, subjects without IOP after administration were excluded. In addition, IOP measurement at 8 hours was not mandatory. That is why there are differences between the number in the Participant Flow and Outcome." (NCT02105272)
Timeframe: Week 8 at 2 hours after IMP administration

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
OPC-1085EL Ophthalmic Solution17.2
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution18.2

[back to top]

Decrease From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure

(NCT02105272)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 8 predose

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
OPC-1085EL Ophthalmic Solution2.9
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution1.6

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 Predose

Comparison of each group in intraocular pressure at Week 8 Predose. The number of subjects showed in the Participant Flow comes from all the subjects administered IMP. For efficacy analysis, on the other hand, several subjects were excluded from the analysis according to the statistical analysis plan. For example, subjects without IOP after administration were excluded. In addition, IOP measurement at 8 hours was not mandatory. That is why there are differences between the number in the Participant Flow and Outcome. (NCT02105272)
Timeframe: Week 8 Predose

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
OPC-1085EL Ophthalmic Solution17.1
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution18.4

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 at 8 Hours After IMP Administration

"Comparison of each group in intraocular pressure at Week 8 at 8hours after IMP administration.~The number of subjects showed in the Participant Flow comes from all the subjects administered IMP. For efficacy analysis, on the other hand, several subjects were excluded from the analysis according to the statistical analysis plan. For example, subjects without IOP after administration were excluded. In addition, IOP measurement at 8 hours was not mandatory. That is why there are differences between the number in the Participant Flow and Outcome." (NCT02105272)
Timeframe: Week 8 at 8 hours after IMP administration

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
OPC-1085EL Ophthalmic Solution16.7
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution17.4

[back to top]

Cmax of Carteolol

(NCT02108288)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 7

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 7
Carteolol Long-acting Ophthalmic Solution0.99841.627
OPC-1085EL Ophthalmic Solution0.85581.174

[back to top]

Tmax of Latanoprost Acid

(NCT02108288)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 7

,
Interventionmin (Median)
Day 1Day 7
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution1010
OPC-1085EL Ophthalmic Solution105

[back to top]

Tmax of Carteolol

(NCT02108288)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 7

,
Interventionh (Median)
Day 1Day 7
Carteolol Long-acting Ophthalmic Solution0.250.38
OPC-1085EL Ophthalmic Solution0.250.25

[back to top]

Cmax of Latanoprost Acid

(NCT02108288)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 7

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 7
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution21.2217.48
OPC-1085EL Ophthalmic Solution19.7718.47

[back to top]

Non-inferiority of T2347 Compared With Xalacom® on Change in Mean IOP at 9.00 am (± 1 Hour) Between the Baseline (Day 0) and Day 84 in the Worse Eye

"the non-inferiority of T2347 unpreserved eye drops compared with Xalacom® on change in mean IOP at 9.00 am (± 1 hour) between the baseline (Day 0) and Day 84 in the worse eye.~Two relevant time points are considered for this primary criteria: D0 and Day 84." (NCT02278614)
Timeframe: Day 84

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
T2347-0.51
Xalacom-0.52

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in IOP at 11:00 at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry at 11:00 AM. A more negative percent change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02419508)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
SIMBRINZA + PGA-31.3
Vehicle + PGA-10.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at 09:00 at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry at 09:00 AM. Baseline is defined as the average of the 9:00 hour values at both Eligibility visits. A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02419508)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineChange from baseline
SIMBRINZA + PGA23.4-4.9
Vehicle + PGA23.4-2.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at 11:00 at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry at 11:00 AM. A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02419508)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineChange from baseline
SIMBRINZA + PGA22.4-7.0
Vehicle + PGA22.6-2.4

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal IOP at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry and averaged over the 09:00 AM and 11:00 AM time points. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02419508)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SIMBRINZA + PGA17.2
Vehicle + PGA20.9

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline at 09:00 at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry at 9:00 AM. Baseline is defined as the average of the 9:00 hour values at both Eligibility visits.A more negative percent change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02419508)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
SIMBRINZA + PGA-21.0
Vehicle + PGA-10.9

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry and averaged over the 09:00 AM and 11:00 AM time points. A more negative percent change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02419508)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
SIMBRINZA + PGA-24.7
Vehicle + PGA-9.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline (on PGA) in Diurnal IOP (Mean of 09:00 and 11:00 Time Points) at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry and averaged over the 09:00 AM and 11:00 AM time points. A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02419508)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SIMBRINZA + PGA-5.6
Vehicle + PGA-2.1

[back to top]

Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure Between Two Measures- Baseline and 3 Months

The mean change from baseline intraocular pressure at 3 months (0800 hrs) (NCT02466399)
Timeframe: 3 months

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
POLAT-001-2.3
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution-6.4

[back to top]

Extent of Exposure

Exposure to study medication in days for all treatment groups (NCT02558400)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventiondays (Mean)
PG324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02%/0.005%275.7
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02%266.2
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005%330.4

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

The primary efficacy variable was mean IOP at 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 hours at Day 15, Day 43 and Day 90, as measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. Secondary analysis were conducted as a part of safety measurements to month 12 on treatment. (NCT02558400)
Timeframe: Primary efficacy endpoint measured for 3 months (data collected at 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 hours at Day 15, Day 43 and Day 90)

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day 1, 0800 hoursDay 1, 1000 hoursDay 1, 1600 hoursDay 15, 0800 hoursDay 15, 1000 hoursDay 15, 1600 hoursDay 43, 0800 hoursDay 43, 1000 hoursDay 43, 1600 hoursDay 90, 0800 hoursDay 90, 1000 hoursDay 90, 1600 hours
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02%24.8123.4522.6318.6617.7817.2519.0617.9217.5419.0417.9617.30
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005%24.5923.4323.4317.7417.3617.1117.5817.0616.9717.5316.8816.67
PG324 Ophthalmic Solution24.8423.7222.5915.6814.9314.8316.0415.3915.4316.3715.4115.49

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

Mean intraocular pressure(IOP) at 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 hours, at Day 15, Day 43 and Day 90, as measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. (NCT02674854)
Timeframe: 3 months

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day 1, 0800 hoursDay 1, 1000 hoursDay 1, 1600 hoursDay 15, 0800 hoursDay 15, 1000 hoursDay 15, 1600 hoursDay 43, 0800 hoursDay 43, 1000 hoursDay 43, 1600 hoursDay 90, 0800 hoursDay 90, 1000 hoursDay 90, 1600 hours
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005%24.7523.2322.5918.1017.6117.0817.9317.3517.0917.9817.4817.14
Netarsudil (AR-13324) Ophthalmic Solution 0.02%24.6623.4022.7619.3517.9917.5319.5218.4017.9519.7218.3017.94
PG324 Ophthalmic Solution24.6923.3322.3716.0615.3115.1616.4315.5415.4516.4515.5815.52

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events.

"the two periods of PRO-067 of each sequence were grouped as well as those of GAAP to form two comparative groups of adverse events in each intervention. (PRO-067 vs. GAAP ofteno).~The number of adverse events presented throughout the study was evaluated with each study drug to make the comparison between groups." (NCT02801617)
Timeframe: it is evaluated from the baseline visit (day 1) to the security call (day 75)

Interventionadverse events (Number)
PRO-06724
GAAP Ofteno®20

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chemosis

The chemosis will be measured as present / absent according to each case. A Pearson´s chi-square test is performed in the crossover and final visit to compare the end of periods 1 and 2 between both study sequences. (NCT02801617)
Timeframe: basal visit (day 1), Crossover visit (day 30) and final visit (day 60)

,
Interventionpercentage of patients with chemosis (Number)
basal visit (day 1)Crossover visit (day 30)final visit (day 60)
Sequence A (PRO-067- GAAP Ofteno®)3.400
Sequence B (GAAP Ofteno® - PRO-067)7.100

[back to top]

Percentage of Ocular Burning

the ocular burning of the study subjects was evaluated, during the baseline, crossover and final visit, the variable was described as present or absent, according to the case, in both groups. A Pearson´s chi-square test is performed in the crossover and final visit to compare the end of periods 1 and 2 between both study sequences. (NCT02801617)
Timeframe: at the basal visit (day 1) crossover visit (day 30) and final visit (day 60)

,
Interventionpercentage of Ocular burning (Number)
basal visitCrossover visitFinal visit
Sequence 1 (PRO-067)20.703.810.3
Sequence 2 (GAAP Ofteno®)19.625.016.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Foreign Body Sensation

The foreign body sensation will be measured as present / absent according to each case. A Pearson´s chi-square test is performed in the crossover and final visit to compare the end of periods 1 and 2 between both study sequences. (NCT02801617)
Timeframe: basal visit (day 1), Crossover visit (day 30) and final visit (day 60)

,
Interventionpercentage of patients with Foreign body (Number)
basal visit (day 1)Crossover visit (day 30final visit (day 60)
Sequence A (PRO-067- GAAP Ofteno®)20.724.117.2
Sequence B (GAAP Ofteno® - PRO-067)37.530.430.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Hyperemia

the hyperemia of the study subjects was evaluated, during the baseline, crossover and final visit, the variable was described as a scale of: absent, very mild, mild, moderate and severe, according to the case, in both groups. A Pearson´s chi-square test is performed in the crossover and final visit to compare the end of periods 1 and 2 between both study sequences. (NCT02801617)
Timeframe: basal visit (day 1), Crossover visit (day 30) and final visit (day 60)

,
Interventionpercentage of patients with hyperemia (Number)
Basal Visit Very MildBasal Visit MildBasal Visit ModerateCross Over Visit Very MildCross Over Visit MildCross Over Visit ModerateFinal visit Very MildFinal Visit MildFinal Visit Moderate
Sequence A (PRO-067- GAAP Ofteno®)53.441.45.260.337.91.767.232.80
Sequence B (GAAP Ofteno® - PRO-067)50.043.94.451.844.63.669.623.27.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Tearing

The tearing will be measured as present / absent according to each case. A Pearson´s chi-square test is performed in the crossover and final visit to compare the end of periods 1 and 2 between both study sequences. (NCT02801617)
Timeframe: basal visit (day 1), Crossover visit (day 30) and final visit (day 60)

,
Interventionpercentage of patients with tearing (Number)
Basal visit (day 1)Crossover visit (day 30)Final visit (day 60)
Sequence A (PRO-067- GAAP Ofteno®)8.68.63.4
Sequence B (GAAP Ofteno® - PRO-067)5.410.77.1

[back to top]

Target Intraocular Pressure (TIOP)

Target Intraocular Pressure (TIOP): Efficacy of experimental drug or active comparator to maintain the IOP in a range at which a patient is likely to remain stable or at which worsening of glaucoma will be slow enough that the risk of additional intervention is not justified.The upper limit of intraocular pressure is: TIOP + 2 mmHg. The measurement of the TIOP in each treatment period. (NCT02801617)
Timeframe: the baseline visit (day 0), Cross Over Visit (day 30) and the final visit (day 60) for both sequences

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
baseline visitCross over visitfinal visit
Sequence A (PRO-067- GAAP Ofteno®)14.2513.8513.99
Sequence B (GAAP Ofteno® - PRO-067)14.0413.9214.07

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

Daily change from diurnal baseline in IOP (NCT02829996)
Timeframe: Two Months

Interventionmm of mercury (Mean)
Trabodenoson 6.0% / Latanoprost 0.005% QD-6.4
Trabodenoson 3.0% / Latanoprost 0.005% QD-6.8
Trabodenoson 6.0% / Latanoprost 0.0025% QD-6.4
Latanoprost 0.005% QD-7.1
Latanoprost 0.0025% QD-5.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure ≤ 18 mmHg in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit

A subject was a responder if the mean diurnal IOP in the study eye was ≤ 18 mmHg. (NCT03216902)
Timeframe: Week 1, Week 2, Week 6 and Month 3.

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 1 -Reduced to 18 mmHg or LowerWeek 2 -Reduced to 18 mmHg or LowerWeek 6 -Reduced to 18 mmHg or LowerMonth 3 -Reduced to 18 mmHg or Lower
0.005% Latanoprost29302730
High Dose 0.003% DE-12630232314
Low Dose 0.001% DE-12620222219
Medium Dose 0.002% DE-12626272527
Ultra-low Dose 0.0005% DE-12616182418

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Reduction From Baseline ≥ 20%, 25% and 30% in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit

"A Subject was a responder if the percent reduction from baseline in mean diurnal IOP in the study eye was ≥ 20%.~A Subject was a responder if the percent reduction from baseline in mean diurnal IOP in the study eye was ≥ 25%.~A Subject was a responder if the percent reduction from baseline in mean diurnal IOP in the study eye was ≥ 30%." (NCT03216902)
Timeframe: WeeK 1, Week 2, Week 6 and Month 3.

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 1- At Least 20% ReductionWeek 1- At Least 25% ReductionWeek 1- At Least 30% ReductionWeek 2- At Least 20% ReductionWeek 2- At Least 25% ReductionWeek 2- At Least 30% ReductionWeek 6- At Least 20% ReductionWeek 6- At Least 25% ReductionWeek 6- At Least 30% ReductionMonth 3- At Least 20% ReductionMonth 3- At Least 25% ReductionMonth 3- At Least 30% Reduction
0.005% Latanoprost362316382720372619362316
High Dose 0.003% DE-126342718332415282614231810
Low Dose 0.001% DE-12628158262213282218272211
Medium Dose 0.002% DE-126312514312717302215372816
Ultra-low Dose 0.0005% DE-1262218927211330171228157

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Reduction From Baseline ≥ 20%, 25% and 30% in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit

"A Subject was a responder if the percent reduction from baseline in mean diurnal IOP in the study eye was ≥ 20%.~A Subject was a responder if the percent reduction from baseline in mean diurnal IOP in the study eye was ≥ 25%.~A Subject was a responder if the percent reduction from baseline in mean diurnal IOP in the study eye was ≥ 30%." (NCT03216902)
Timeframe: WeeK 1, Week 2, Week 6 and Month 3.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 1- At Least 20% ReductionWeek 1- At Least 25% ReductionWeek 1- At Least 30% ReductionWeek 2- At Least 20% ReductionWeek 2- At Least 25% ReductionWeek 2- At Least 30% ReductionWeek 6- At Least 20% ReductionWeek 6- At Least 25% ReductionWeek 6- At Least 30% Reduction
Placebo (Vehicle of DE-126) Followed by High Dose of DE-126200000311

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Month 3

Intraocular Pressure (IOP),the fluid pressure inside the eye was measured by the Goldmann applanation tonometer in millimeters mercury (mmHg) at 3 time-points throughout the day. (NCT03216902)
Timeframe: 9:00, 13:00 and 17:00 at Month 3

,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
9:0013:0017:00
0.005% Latanoprost18.117.317.2
High Dose 0.003% DE-12619.318.717.9
Low Dose 0.001% DE-12619.218.117.8
Medium Dose 0.002% DE-12617.617.416.7
Placebo (Vehicle of DE-126) Followed by High Dose of DE-12618.817.617.8
Ultra-low Dose 0.0005% DE-12619.718.518.3

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Week 1 and Week 2

Intraocular Pressure (IOP),the fluid pressure inside the eye was measured by the Goldmann applanation tonometer in millimeters mercury (mmHg) at 3 time-points throughout the day. (NCT03216902)
Timeframe: 9:00, 13:00 and 17:00 at Week 1 and Week 2

,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Week1 9:00Week1 13:00Week1 17:00Week 2 9:00Week 2 13:00Week2 17:00
0.005% Latanoprost17.717.517.417.617.416.9
High Dose 0.003% DE-12618.017.617.218.317.617.3
Low Dose 0.001% DE-12618.918.618.518.718.117.8
Medium Dose 0.002% DE-12618.117.116.917.917.216.7
Placebo (Vehicle of DE-126) Followed by High Dose of DE-12622.822.821.622.722.021.9
Ultra-low Dose 0.0005% DE-12619.418.718.119.418.218.2

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Week 6

Intraocular Pressure (IOP),the fluid pressure inside the eye was measured by the Goldmann applanation tonometer in millimeters mercury (mmHg) at 3 time-points throughout the day. (NCT03216902)
Timeframe: 9:00, 13:00 and 17:00 at Week 6

,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
9:0013:0017:00
High Dose 0.003% DE-12618.717.517.4
Low Dose 0.001% DE-12618.517.917.9
Medium Dose 0.002% DE-12618.717.316.6
Placebo (Vehicle of DE-126) Followed by High Dose of DE-12623.222.221.6
Ultra-low Dose 0.0005% DE-12619.018.217.8

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit

Mean Diurnal IOP was defined as the mean of the IOP values at the three schedules timepoints (9:00, 13:00 and 17:00) at that visit for that subject. (NCT03216902)
Timeframe: Week 1, Week 2, Week 6 and Month 3.

,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 6Month 3
0.005% Latanoprost17.517.317.317.5
High Dose 0.003% DE-12617.617.717.818.6
Low Dose 0.001% DE-12618.718.218.118.4
Medium Dose 0.002% DE-12617.417.317.517.2
Placebo (Vehicle of DE-126) Followed by High Dose of DE-12622.422.221.718.1
Ultra-low Dose 0.0005% DE-12618.818.618.418.8

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline (CFB) in Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Three Time Points at Each Post-baseline Visit

Intraocular Pressure (IOP),the fluid pressure inside the eye was measured by the Goldmann applanation tonometer in millimeters mercury (mmHg) at 3 time-points throughout the day. (NCT03216902)
Timeframe: 9:00, 13:00 and 17:00 at Week 1, Week 2, Week 6 and Month 3.

,,,,,
InterventionPercentage of change in IOP (Mean)
Week 1 9:00Week 1 13:00Week 1 17:00Week 2 9:00Week 2 13:00Week 2 17:00Week 6 9:00Week 6 13:00Week 6 17:00Month 3 at 9:00Month 3 at 13:00Month 3 at 17:00
0.005% Latanoprost-28.5-27.3-25.7-28.9-27.8-27.8-27.5-28.8-28.4-27.3-28.2-26.8
High Dose 0.003% DE-126-26.5-27.0-26.8-25.6-27.0-26.3-24.3-27.8-26.1-21.4-22.5-23.4
Low Dose 0.001% DE-126-23.7-22.8-21.5-24.5-24.9-24.4-25.3-25.6-24.0-22.8-24.8-24.3
Medium Dose 0.002% DE-126-26.5-28.0-27.9-27.4-27.8-28.8-24.4-27.7-29.4-28.8-27.3-28.7
Placebo (Vehicle of DE-126) Followed by High Dose of DE-126-8.7-5.3-11.5-7.8-7.5-9.9-8.4-8.6-11.1-23.3-25.3-25.4
Ultra-low Dose 0.0005% DE-126-21.6-23.3-23.4-21.7-25.1-23.5-22.8-24.5-24.6-20.6-24.2-22.7

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline (CFB) in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit

Mean Diurnal IOP was defined as the mean of the IOP values at the three schedules timepoints (9:00, 13:00 and 17:00) at that visit for that subject. (NCT03216902)
Timeframe: Week 1, Week 2, Week 6 and Month 3.

,,,,,
InterventionPercentage of change (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 6Month 3
0.005% Latanoprost-27.3-28.3-28.5-27.5
High Dose 0.003% DE-126-27.0-26.4-26.2-22.7
Low Dose 0.001% DE-126-22.9-24.7-25.1-24.1
Medium Dose 0.002% DE-126-27.4-28.2-27.2-28.4
Placebo (Vehicle of DE-126) Followed by High Dose of DE-126-8.6-8.6-9.4-24.7
Ultra-low Dose 0.0005% DE-126-22.8-23.5-24.0-22.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure ≤ 18 mmHg in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit

A subject was a responder if the mean diurnal IOP in the study eye was ≤ 18 mmHg. (NCT03216902)
Timeframe: Week 1, Week 2, Week 6 and Month 3.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 1 -Reduced to 18 mmHg or LowerWeek 2 -Reduced to 18 mmHg or LowerWeek 6 -Reduced to 18 mmHg or Lower
Placebo (Vehicle of DE-126) Followed by High Dose of DE-126012

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (CFB) in Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Three Time Points at Each Post-baseline Visit

Intraocular Pressure (IOP),the fluid pressure inside the eye was measured by the Goldmann applanation tonometer in millimeters mercury (mmHg) at 3 time-points throughout the day. (NCT03216902)
Timeframe: 9:00, 13:00 and 17:00 at Week 1, Week 2, Week 6 and Month 3.

,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Week 1 9:00Week 1 13:00Week 1 17:00Week 2 9:00Week 2 13:00Week 2 17:00Week 6 9:00Week 6 13:00Week 6 17:00Month 3 at 9:00Month 3 at 13:00Month 3 at 17:00
0.005% Latanoprost-7.3-6.8-6.2-7.4-6.8-6.7-7.0-7.0-6.8-6.9-6.9-6.4
High Dose 0.003% DE-126-6.6-6.7-6.4-6.4-6.7-6.3-6.1-6.8-6.2-5.4-5.5-5.5
Low Dose 0.001% DE-126-6.0-5.6-5.2-6.2-6.0-5.8-6.4-6.2-5.7-5.7-6.0-5.8
Medium Dose 0.002% DE-126-6.7-6.8-6.7-6.9-6.8-6.9-6.1-6.8-7.0-7.2-6.7-6.9
Placebo (Vehicle of DE-126) Followed by High Dose of DE-126-2.1-1.2-2.8-1.9-1.8-2.4-2.0-2.1-2.7-5.6-6.0-6.1
Ultra-low Dose 0.0005% DE-126-5.3-5.7-5.6-5.5-6.2-5.7-5.7-6.1-5.9-5.1-5.9-5.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (CFB) in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit

Mean Diurnal IOP was defined as the mean of the IOP values at the three schedules timepoints (9:00, 13:00 and 17:00) at that visit for that subject. (NCT03216902)
Timeframe: Week 1, Week 2, Week 6 and Month 3.

,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 6Month 3
0.001% Low Dose DE-126-5.6-6.0-6.1-5.9
0.005% Latanoprost-6.7-7.0-7.0-6.7
High Dose 0.003% DE-126-6.6-6.5-6.4-5.5
Medium Dose 0.002% DE-126-6.7-6.9-6.6-6.9
Placebo (Vehicle of DE-126) Followed by High Dose of DE-126-2.1-2.0-2.3-5.9
Ultra-low Dose 0.0005% DE-126-5.5-5.8-5.9-5.5

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

Comparison of PG324 to Ganfort for mean intraocular pressure at specified timepoints at Week 2, Week 6 and Month 3. (NCT03284853)
Timeframe: Day 90

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 2Week 6Month 3
GANFORT®15.5615.2515.19
Netarsudil/Latanoprost 0.02%/0.005%15.3915.6415.61

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Study Eye Mean Diurnal IOP at Week 1, Week 2, and Exit Visit

Participants used medication in both eyes from baseline to the evening prior to the week 4 visit. One eye was designated the study eye at baseline. The study eye was defined as the eye with the highest mean diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) value at baseline (or the right eye if both eyes had the same IOP value at baseline). Mean diurnal IOP is the average of the 8AM, 10AM and 4PM values. Visits were conducted at week 1, week 2, week 4, and an exit visit (1 to 2 days following the week 4 visit) (NCT03657797)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, week 2, exit visit

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Exit Visit
Latanoprost 0.005%-7.54-7.99-4.89
NCX 470 0.021%-7.73-7.96-4.95
NCX 470 0.042%-8.15-8.38-5.59
NCX 470 0.065%-8.66-8.87-5.98

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Ocular Adverse Events

Safety and tolerability based on percentage of subjects with treatment-emergent ocular adverse events (NCT03657797)
Timeframe: 4 weeks for adverse events and through 30 days post-treatment for serious adverse events

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NCX 470 0.021%34
NCX 470 0.042%52
NCX 470 0.065%50
Latanoprost 0.005%21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Study Eye Mean Diurnal IOP at the Week 4

Participants used medication in both eyes for 4 weeks with one eye was designated the study eye at baseline. The study eye was defined as the eye with the highest mean diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) value at baseline (or the right eye if both eyes had the same IOP value at baseline). Mean diurnal IOP at week 4 is the average of the 8AM, 10AM and 4PM IOPs at week 4. (NCT03657797)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
NCX 470 0.021%-7.79
NCX 470 0.042%-8.28
NCX 470 0.065%-8.70
Latanoprost 0.005%-7.41

[back to top]

NFC Blood Flow at Baseline and 15 Minutes

NFC blood flow at baseline and at 15 minutes after NF application to the 4th digit of the nondominant hand. (NCT03949244)
Timeframe: baseline and 15 minutes

,,
InterventionpL/s (Mean)
Baseline15 minutes
Latanoprost 0.005%72.5260.50
Latanoprost Bunod 0.024%83.9475.57
Normal Saline 0.9%93.0169.70

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure at Day 28 (Study Eye)

Change from Baseline in Diurnal Mean IOP (mmHg) at Day 28 in the Study Eye -- ITT Population (NCT04405245)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 28

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
AKB-9778 4% QD + Latanoprost-6.95
AKB-9778 4% BID + Latanoprost-7.95
Placebo Twice Daily + Latanoprost-7.04

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Diurnal Mean IOP at the Day 14 Visit (Study Eye)

Change from Baseline in Diurnal Mean IOP (mmHg) at Day 14 in the Study Eye -- ITT Population (NCT04405245)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 14

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
AKB-9778 4% QD + Latanoprost-6.75
AKB-9778 4% BID + Latanoprost-7.62
Placebo Twice Daily + Latanoprost-7.03

[back to top]

Percentages of Subjects Achieving Pre-Specified Mean, Mean Change, and Percent Mean Change in Diurnal Mean IOP Levels

Percentages of Subjects Achieving Pre-Specified Mean, Mean Change, and Percent Mean Change in Diurnal Mean IOP Levels in Study Eye -- ITT Population (NCT04405245)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 28

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Pre-Specified Mean IOP: <=22 mmHgPercentage of Subjects Achieving Pre-Specified Mean IOP: <=20 mmHgPercentage of Subjects Achieving Pre-Specified Mean IOP: <=18 mmHgPercentage of Subjects Achieving Pre-Specified Mean IOP: <=16 mmHgPercentage of Subjects Achieving Pre-Specified Mean IOP : <=14 mmHgPercentages of Subjects Achieving Mean Change (IOP Reduction from Baseline) : >=2 mmHgPercentages of Subjects Achieving Mean Change (IOP Reduction from Baseline) : >=3 mmHgPercentages of Subjects Achieving Mean Change (IOP Reduction from Baseline) : >=4 mmHgPercentages of Subjects Achieving Mean Change (IOP Reduction from Baseline) : >=6 mmHgPercentages of Subjects Achieving Mean Change (IOP Reduction from Baseline) : >=8 mmHgPercentages of Subjects Achieving Mean Change (IOP Reduction from Baseline) : >=10 mmHgPercent Mean Change in Diurnal Mean IOP Levels (IOP Percent Reduction from Baseline): >=5%Percent Mean Change in Diurnal Mean IOP Levels (IOP Percent Reduction from Baseline): >=10%Percent Mean Change in Diurnal Mean IOP Levels (IOP Percent Reduction from Baseline): >=15%Percent Mean Change in Diurnal Mean IOP Levels (IOP Percent Reduction from Baseline): >=20%Percent Mean Change in Diurnal Mean IOP Levels (IOP Percent Reduction from Baseline): >=25%Percent Mean Change in Diurnal Mean IOP Levels (IOP Percent Reduction from Baseline): >=30%Percent Mean Change in Diurnal Mean IOP Levels (IOP Percent Reduction from Baseline): >=35%Percent Mean Change in Diurnal Mean IOP Levels (IOP Percent Reduction from Baseline): >=40%
AKB-9778 4% BID + Latanoprost636046206656564573296565646255401810
AKB-9778 4% QD + Latanoprost60563514363626147213636261574325134
Placebo Twice Daily + Latanoprost58513513464636044204646359534127114

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change From Diurnally Adjusted Baseline IOP at Each Time Point on Days 14 and 28

Percent Change from Baseline IOP (mmHg) at Each Time Point on Day 14 and Day 28 in the Study Eyes -- ITT Population (NCT04405245)
Timeframe: Baseline to each timepoint on Day 14 and Baseline to each timepoint on Day 28

,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Day 14, 08:00Day 14, 10:00Day 14, 12:00Day 14, 16:00Day 28, 08:00Day 28, 10:00Day 28, 12:00Day 28, 16:00
AKB-9778 4% BID + Latanoprost-30.41-31.10-30.19-28.94-30.96-32.36-33.09-29.65
AKB-9778 4% QD + Latanoprost-25.52-28.09-28.21-26.48-28.19-28.12-27.65-27.21
Placebo Twice Daily + Latanoprost-28.68-29.29-27.53-26.61-27.93-29.70-29.03-25.58

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Diurnal Mean IOP on Days 14 and 28 (Both Eyes)

Mean change from baseline in diurnal mean IOP (measured in mmHg) at Day 14 and 28 in both eyes - ITT Population (NCT04405245)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 14 and Baseline to Day 28

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline to Day 14Baseline to Day 28
AKB-9778 4% BID + Latanoprost-7.53-7.86
AKB-9778 4% QD + Latanoprost-6.68-6.83
Placebo Twice Daily + Latanoprost-6.91-6.93

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Diurnal Mean IOP on Days 14 and 28

Percent Change from Baseline in Diurnal Mean IOP (mmHg) at Day 14 and Day 28 in the Study Eye -- ITT Population (NCT04405245)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 14 and Baseline to Day 28

,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Baseline to Day 14Baseline to Day 28
AKB-9778 4% BID + Latanoprost-30.29-31.67
AKB-9778 4% QD + Latanoprost-27.08-27.83
Placebo Twice Daily + Latanoprost-28.16-28.19

[back to top]

Mean Observed IOP at Each Time Point on Days 14 and 28

Mean observed IOP measured in mmHg at each time point on Days 14 and 28 (study eye) - ITT Population (NCT04405245)
Timeframe: Baseline to each timepoint on Day 14 and Baseline to each timepoint on Day 28

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day 14, 08:00Day 14, 10:00Day 14, 12:00Day 14, 16:00Day 28, 08:00Day 28, 10:00Day 28, 12:00Day 28, 16:00
AKB-9778 4% BID + Latanoprost18.2517.3217.2517.1718.1317.0216.5516.97
AKB-9778 4% QD + Latanoprost19.5417.9817.5017.5218.8117.9717.6017.35
Placebo Twice Daily + Latanoprost18.7518.0217.8717.5618.9517.9017.5117.82

[back to top]

Observed Mean Diurnal Mean IOP on Days 14 and 28 (Both Eyes)

Mean of the Diurnal Mean IOP (mmHg) at Day 14 and Day 28 in both eyes -- ITT Population (NCT04405245)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 14 and Baseline to Day 28

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline to Day 14Baseline to Day 28
AKB-9778 4% BID + Latanoprost17.3717.03
AKB-9778 4% QD + Latanoprost18.0117.86
Placebo Twice Daily + Latanoprost17.9517.92

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline IOP at Each Time Point on Days 14 and 28

Change from Baseline in Mean IOP (mmHg) at Each Time Point on Day 14 and Day 28 in the Study Eyes -- ITT Population (NCT04405245)
Timeframe: Baseline to each timepoint on Day 14 and Baseline to each timepoint on Day 28

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day 14, 08:00Day 14, 10:00Day 14, 12:00Day 14, 16:00Day 28, 08:00Day 28, 10:00Day 28, 12:00Day 28, 16:00
AKB-9778 4% BID + Latanoprost-8.13-7.88-7.52-7.10-8.25-8.19-8.21-7.30
AKB-9778 4% QD + Latanoprost-6.66-7.02-6.79-6.29-7.39-7.03-6.69-6.45
Placebo Twice Daily + Latanoprost-7.59-7.45-6.83-6.36-7.38-7.57-7.18-6.10

[back to top]