Page last updated: 2024-11-08

octreotide

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID383414
CHEMBL ID262746
SCHEMBL ID678434
MeSH IDM0023526
PubMed CID448601
CHEMBL ID1680
CHEBI ID7726
SCHEMBL ID10044649
MeSH IDM0023526

Synonyms (87)

Synonym
LS-15492
gtpl2055
sms 201,995
10-(4-aminobutyl)-19-[(2-amino-3-phenylpropanoyl)amino]-n-(1,3-dihydroxybutan-2-yl)-7-(1-hydroxyethyl)-13-(1h-indol-3-ylmethyl)-6,9,12,15,18-pentaoxo-16-(phenylmethyl)-1,2-dithia-5,8,11,14,17-pentazacycloicosane-4-carboxamide
NCI60_025753
C07306
d-phenylalanyl-l-cysteinyl-l-phenylalanyl-d-tryptophyl-l-lysyl-l- threonyl-n-((1r,2r)-2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)propyl)-l- cysteinamide cyclic (2->7)-disulfide
83150-76-9
octreotide (usan/inn)
D00442
(4r,7s,10s,13r,16s,19r)-10-(4-aminobutyl)-19-[[(2r)-2-amino-3-phenylpropanoyl]amino]-16-benzyl-n-[(2r,3r)-1,3-dihydroxybutan-2-yl]-7-[(1r)-1-hydroxyethyl]-13-(1h-indol-3-ylmethyl)-6,9,12,15,18-pentaoxo-1,2-dithia-5,8,11,14,17-pentazacycloicosane-4-carboxa
L000453
(4r,7s,10s,13r,16s,19r)-10-(4-aminobutyl)-19-[[(2r)-2-amino-3-phenyl-propanoyl]amino]-16-benzyl-7-[(1r)-1-hydroxyethyl]-n-[(1r,2r)-2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)propyl]-13-(1h-indol-3-ylmethyl)-6,9,12,15,18-pentaoxo-1,2-dithia-5,8,11,14,17-pentazacycloicosan
A840511
CHEMBL262746
FT-0630918
10-(4-aminobutyl)-16-benzyl-n-(1,3-dihydroxybutan-2-yl)-7-(1-hydroxyethyl)-13-(1h-indol-3-ylmethyl)-6,9,12,15,18-pentaoxo-19-(phenylalanylamino)-1,2-dithia-5,8,11,14,17-pentaazacycloicosane-4-carboxam
STL483734
SCHEMBL678434
AKOS026750549
BCP28870
octreotide acetate; longastatin; sms-201-995; octreotide-lar; sms 201-995
Q27088142
1240797-41-4
octreotide-phenylalanine-d8;sandostatin-d8; sandostatin lar-d8
octreotide d8
BCP31200
NCGC00379009-01
sms 201-995
l-cysteinamide, d-phenylalanyl-l-cysteinyl-l-phenylalanyl-d-tryptophyl-l-lysyl-l- threonyl-n-(2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)propyl)-, cyclic (2->7)-disulfide, (r-(r*,r*))-
sms-995
octrotide
DB00104
octreotida [spanish]
sms-201-995
d-phenylalanyl-l-cysteinyl-l-phenylalanyl-d-tryptophyl-l-lysyl-l-threonyl-n-((1r,2r)-2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)propyl)-l-cysteinamide cyclic (2-7)-disulfide
d-phenylalanyl-l-cysteinyl-l-phenylalanyl-d-tryptophyl-l-lysyl-l-threonyl-l-cysteinyl-l-threoninol cyclic (2-7)-disulfide
octreotide [usan:inn:ban]
drg-0115
octreotidum [latin]
l-cysteinamide, d-phenylalanyl-l-cysteinyl-l-phenylalanyl-d-tryptophyl-l-lysyl-l-threonyl-n-(2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)propyl)-, cyclic (2-7)-disulfide, (r-(r*,r*))-
HMS2090C09
bdbm50272772
2-{[(13r,16s,19r)-10-(4-amino-butyl)-19-((s)-2-amino-3-phenyl-propionylamino)-16-benzyl-7-(1-hydroxy-ethyl)-13-(1h-indol-3-ylmethyl)-6,9,12,15,18-pentaoxo-1,2-dithia-5,8,11,14,17-pentaaza-cycloicosane-4-carbonyl]-amino}-3-hydroxy-butyric acid
10-(4-amino-butyl)-19-(2-amino-3-phenyl-propionylamino)-16-benzyl-7-(1-hydroxy-ethyl)-13-(1h-indol-3-ylmethyl)-6,9,12,15,18-pentaoxo-1,2-dithia-5,8,11,14,17-pentaaza-cycloicosane-4-carboxylic acid (2-hydroxy-1-
CHEMBL1680 ,
sms995
octreotide-lar
rwm8ccw8gp ,
octreotida
octreotidum
unii-rwm8ccw8gp
dtxcid6028608
dtxsid0048682 ,
AKOS015994656
octreotide [who-dd]
octreotide [ep monograph]
d-phenylalanyl-l-cysteinyl-l-phenylalanyl-d-tryptophyl-l-lysyl-l-threonyl-n-((1r,2r)-2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)propyl)-l-cysteinamide cyclic (2->7)-disulfide
l-cysteinamide, d-phenylalanyl-l-cysteinyl-l-phenylalanyl-d-tryptophyl-l-lysyl-l-threonyl-n-(2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)propyl)-, cyclic (2->7)-disulfide, (r-(r*,r*))-
octreotide [mi]
octreotide [inn]
octreotide [usan]
d-phenylalanyl-l-hemicystyl-l-phenylalanyl-d-tryptophyl-l-lysyl-l-threonyl-l-hemicystyl-l-threoninol cyclic (2->7)-disulfide
octreotide [vandf]
HS-2020 ,
DEQANNDTNATYII-OULOTJBUSA-N
AB01275486-01
CHEBI:7726 ,
SCHEMBL10044649
Q-201501
AC-28733
mfcd00871400
d-phenylalanyl-l-cysteinyl-l-phenylalanyl-d-tryptophyl-l-lysyl-l-threonyl-l-cysteinyl-l-threoninol cyclic (2->7)-disulfide
octreotide, >=98% (hplc)
(4r,7s,10s,13r,16s,19r)-13-((1h-indol-3-yl)methyl)-19-((r)-2-amino-3-phenylpropanamido)-10-(4-aminobutyl)-16-benzyl-n-((2r,3r)-1,3-dihydroxybutan-2-yl)-7-((r)-1-hydroxyethyl)-6,9,12,15,18-pentaoxo-1,2-dithia-5,8,11,14,17-pentaazacycloicosane-4-carboxamide
Q419935
83150-76-9 (free base)
CCG-270610
EX-A4865
octreotode acetate
[r-(r*,r*)]-d-phenylalanyl-l-cysteinyl-l-phenylalanyl-d-tryptophyl-l-lysyl-l-threonyl-n-[2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxy-methyl)propyl]-cysteinamide cyclic(2-->7)-disulfide
octreotide crs
octreotide (ep monograph)
d-phenylalanyl-l-cysteinyl-l-phenylalanyl-d-tryptophyl-l-lysyl-l-threonyl-n-((1r,2r)-2-hydroxy-1-(hyroxymethyl)propyl)-l-cysteinamide, cyclic (2->7)-disulfide
h01cb02
octreotidum (latin)
d-phenylalanyl-l-cysteinyl-l-phenyl-alanyl-d-tryptophyl-l-lysyl-l-threonyl-n-(2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)propyl)-l-cysteinamide cyclic (2->7)-disulfide
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Protein Targets (3)

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Somatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.00040.00000.40914.7200AID1571190
Somatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.00000.00010.00210.0042AID1533639
Somatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.06600.00060.27333.2000AID1571189
Somatostatin receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.02200.00020.04720.3930AID1533640
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Somatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.00000.00000.00080.0023AID1781889
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (19)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwaySomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
spermatogenesisSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
peristalsisSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
forebrain developmentSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
somatostatin signaling pathwaySomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to starvationSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucocorticoid stimulusSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to estradiol stimulusSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide signaling pathwaySomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwaySomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerSomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationSomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
cell migrationSomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
forebrain developmentSomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
somatostatin signaling pathwaySomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeSomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of arachidonic acid secretionSomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of adenylate cyclase-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwaySomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide signaling pathwaySomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucocorticoid stimulusSomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwaySomatostatin receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerSomatostatin receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationSomatostatin receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytokinesisSomatostatin receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
somatostatin signaling pathwaySomatostatin receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucocorticoid stimulusSomatostatin receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide signaling pathwaySomatostatin receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of insulin secretionSomatostatin receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (4)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
protein bindingSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
PDZ domain bindingSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
somatostatin receptor activitySomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide bindingSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
somatostatin receptor activitySomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide bindingSomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSomatostatin receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide bindingSomatostatin receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
somatostatin receptor activitySomatostatin receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (3)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cytosolSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSomatostatin receptor type 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionSomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSomatostatin receptor type 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSomatostatin receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSomatostatin receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionSomatostatin receptor type 5Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (38)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1346332Human SST3 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1999Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, Nov, Volume: 360, Issue:5
Characterisation of human recombinant somatostatin receptors. 1. Radioligand binding studies.
AID1346424Human SST2 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1994Endocrinology, Dec, Volume: 135, Issue:6
Subtype selectivity of peptide analogs for all five cloned human somatostatin receptors (hsstr 1-5).
AID1346332Human SST3 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1994Endocrinology, Dec, Volume: 135, Issue:6
Subtype selectivity of peptide analogs for all five cloned human somatostatin receptors (hsstr 1-5).
AID1346419Rat SST2 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1998Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology, , Volume: 133The elucidation of somatostatin receptor functions: a current view.
AID1346413Human SST5 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1999Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, Nov, Volume: 360, Issue:5
Characterisation of human recombinant somatostatin receptors. 1. Radioligand binding studies.
AID1346424Human SST2 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1998European journal of pharmacology, May-08, Volume: 348, Issue:2-3
[125I][Tyr3]octreotide labels human somatostatin sst2 and sst5 receptors.
AID1346420Rat SST5 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1998Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology, , Volume: 133The elucidation of somatostatin receptor functions: a current view.
AID1346332Human SST3 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1996Metabolism: clinical and experimental, Aug, Volume: 45, Issue:8 Suppl 1
Binding properties of somatostatin receptor subtypes.
AID1346424Human SST2 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1998Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Sep-01, Volume: 95, Issue:18
Synthesis and biological activities of potent peptidomimetics selective for somatostatin receptor subtype 2.
AID1346311Mouse SST2 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1998Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology, , Volume: 133The elucidation of somatostatin receptor functions: a current view.
AID1346413Human SST5 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1996Metabolism: clinical and experimental, Aug, Volume: 45, Issue:8 Suppl 1
Binding properties of somatostatin receptor subtypes.
AID1346424Human SST2 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1999Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, Nov, Volume: 360, Issue:5
Characterisation of human recombinant somatostatin receptors. 1. Radioligand binding studies.
AID1346424Human SST2 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1998Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, May, Volume: 357, Issue:5
[125I]Tyr10-cortistatin14 labels all five somatostatin receptors.
AID1346413Human SST5 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1998European journal of pharmacology, May-08, Volume: 348, Issue:2-3
[125I][Tyr3]octreotide labels human somatostatin sst2 and sst5 receptors.
AID1346424Human SST2 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1996Metabolism: clinical and experimental, Aug, Volume: 45, Issue:8 Suppl 1
Binding properties of somatostatin receptor subtypes.
AID1346413Human SST5 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1998Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology, , Volume: 133The elucidation of somatostatin receptor functions: a current view.
AID1346332Human SST3 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1993FEBS letters, Apr-26, Volume: 321, Issue:2-3
A human somatostatin receptor (SSTR3), located on chromosome 22, displays preferential affinity for somatostatin-14 like peptides.
AID1346413Human SST5 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1998Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Sep-01, Volume: 95, Issue:18
Synthesis and biological activities of potent peptidomimetics selective for somatostatin receptor subtype 2.
AID1346332Human SST3 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1998Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, May, Volume: 357, Issue:5
[125I]Tyr10-cortistatin14 labels all five somatostatin receptors.
AID1346397Mouse SST5 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)2000Neuropharmacology, Jun-08, Volume: 39, Issue:8
Cloning, expression and pharmacological characterisation of the mouse somatostatin sst(5) receptor.
AID1346332Human SST3 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1998Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Sep-01, Volume: 95, Issue:18
Synthesis and biological activities of potent peptidomimetics selective for somatostatin receptor subtype 2.
AID1346413Human SST5 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1998Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, May, Volume: 357, Issue:5
[125I]Tyr10-cortistatin14 labels all five somatostatin receptors.
AID1346321Rat SST3 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1998Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology, , Volume: 133The elucidation of somatostatin receptor functions: a current view.
AID1346404Mouse SST3 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1993Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 43, Issue:6
Cloned somatostatin receptors: identification of subtype-selective peptides and demonstration of high affinity binding of linear peptides.
AID1346413Human SST5 receptor (Somatostatin receptors)1994Endocrinology, Dec, Volume: 135, Issue:6
Subtype selectivity of peptide analogs for all five cloned human somatostatin receptors (hsstr 1-5).
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1533639Inhibition of human SSTR4 by radioligand binding assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 163Ligand design for somatostatin receptor isoforms 4 and 5.
AID1571189Binding affinity to human SST4 receptor
AID1381540Agonist activity at SSTR5 (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of forskolin-induced CRE promoter activity at 10 to 1000 nM by luciferase reporter gene assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-30, Volume: 26, Issue:13
New somatostatin-drug conjugates for effective targeting pancreatic cancer.
AID1882821Stability of the compound in simulated gastric fluid at pH 1.2 assessed as half life measured up to 24 hrs by RP-HPLC-UV analysis2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-28, Volume: 65, Issue:8
On the Utility of Chemical Strategies to Improve Peptide Gut Stability.
AID1381538Agonist activity at SSTR3 (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of forskolin-induced CRE promoter activity at 10 to 1000 nM by luciferase reporter gene assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-30, Volume: 26, Issue:13
New somatostatin-drug conjugates for effective targeting pancreatic cancer.
AID1882822Stability of the compound in simulated intestinal fluid at pH 6.8 assessed as half life measured up to 24 hrs by RP-HPLC-UV analysis2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-28, Volume: 65, Issue:8
On the Utility of Chemical Strategies to Improve Peptide Gut Stability.
AID1781889Agonist activity at human SSTR2 expressed in CHO-K1 cells assessed as inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation measured after 30 mins by GloSensor cAMP Assay2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 11-01, Volume: 49Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel somatostatin receptor subtype-2 agonists: Optimization for potency and risk mitigation of hERG and phospholipidosis.
AID1533640Inhibition of human SSTR5 by radioligand binding assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 163Ligand design for somatostatin receptor isoforms 4 and 5.
AID1381537Agonist activity at SSTR2 (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of forskolin-induced CRE promoter activity at 10 to 1000 nM by luciferase reporter gene assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-30, Volume: 26, Issue:13
New somatostatin-drug conjugates for effective targeting pancreatic cancer.
AID1571190Binding affinity to human SST2 receptor
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (17)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's9 (52.94)18.2507
2000's1 (5.88)29.6817
2010's4 (23.53)24.3611
2020's3 (17.65)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 104.57

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index104.57 (24.57)
Research Supply Index2.40 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.45 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index184.10 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (104.57)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials0 (0.00%)5.53%
Trials0 (0.00%)5.53%
Reviews2 (20.00%)6.00%
Reviews1 (14.29%)6.00%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other8 (80.00%)84.16%
Other6 (85.71%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (235)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Double-blind Randomised Placebo-controlled Feasibility Study to Assess the Impact of Octreotide Infusion During Liver Transplantation on Post-operative Renal Failure. [NCT04941911]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-27Active, not recruiting
Everolimus Added to Long Acting Octreotide as a Volume Reducing Treatment of Polycystic Livers [NCT01157858]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial on Role of Octreotide in Preventing Pancreatic Fistula and Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients With Soft Pancreas [NCT01301222]Phase 4110 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Continuing Somatostatin Analogues Upon Progression in Neuroendocrine Tumour pAtients - The SAUNA Trial [NCT05701241]Phase 4270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-28Recruiting
Al18F-NOTA-octreotide PET Imaging of the Somatostatin Receptor in Neuroendocrine Tumors: a First-in-human PET/CT Study [NCT03883776]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-11Completed
[NCT01587222]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to the sponsor did not provide the treatment)
Terlipressin Versus Somatostatin/Octreotide on Effect of Renal Function in Cirrhotic Patients With Acute Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage (TORCH): A Retrospective Multicenter Observational Study [NCT03846180]1,682 participants (Actual)Observational2019-03-01Completed
Phase II Study of the Combination of Bevacizumab Plus Somatostatin Analogue and Metronomic Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Inoperable Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT01203306]Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-01-31Recruiting
Phase I Study of Anti-IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody, IMC-A12, and mTOR Inhibitor, Everolimus, in Advanced Low to Intermediate Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinoma [NCT01204476]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
A Phase 1 Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Single Doses of Octreotide Administered Orally Via the RaniPill™ Capsule in Healthy Subjects [NCT03798912]Phase 162 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-09Completed
A Phase II Study on Everolimus, an mTOR Inhibitor (Oral Formulation), With Octreotide LAR® in Adult Patients With Advanced, Non-functioning, Well-differentiated Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumours (GI NET) [NCT01567488]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-08Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Four- Part Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of ONO-5788 in Healthy Adult Volunteers [NCT03571594]Phase 176 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-07Terminated(stopped due to The study met a pre-defined protocol study stopping criteria)
Continuous 5-fluorouracil Infusion Plus Long Acting Octreotide in Advanced Well Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas. A Phase II Trial of the Piemonte Oncology Network. [NCT00953394]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-02-28Completed
Gastrointestinal Nutrient Transit and Enteroendocrine Function After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery [NCT03734627]40 participants (Actual)Observational2016-07-01Completed
The Longitudinal Approach to Acromegaly: A Pattern of Treatment and Comparative Effectiveness Research [NCT03158090]1,965 participants (Anticipated)Observational2017-12-15Recruiting
Gallium-68 DOTATOC for Management of Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT02375464]0 participants Expanded Access2015-04-30No longer available
A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF LONG-ACTING SOMATOSTATIN (OCTREOTIDE LAR) THERAPY ON DISEASE PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT POLYCYSTIC KIDNEY DISEASE AND MODERATE TO SEVE [NCT01377246]Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
The Effect of Octreotide on the Duration of Post-mastectomy Wound Drainage: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05682209]Phase 441 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-18Completed
A Multicentre, Stratified, Open, Randomized, Comparator-controlled, Parallel-group Phase III Study Comparing Treatment With 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate to Octreotide LAR in Patients With Inoperable, Progressive, Somatostatin Receptor Positive Midgut Carci [NCT01578239]Phase 3231 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-06Completed
Prophylactic Octreotide to Prevent Post Duodenal EMR and Ampullectomy Bleeding [NCT02032784]Phase 433 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Difficult to enroll subjects)
Comparison of Combination Low-Dose SRL + Daily Pegvisomant Therapy, Low-Dose SRL + Weekly Pegvisomant Therapy, and High-Dose SRL + Weekly Pegvisomant Therapy [NCT01538966]76 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-29Terminated(stopped due to Review of the 12-month data showed patients who deviated from protocol with full IRB monitoring and reporting could not be optimally analyzed. Reopening the study for new enrollment is not feasible and the study was terminated with IRB approval.)
A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Study to Investigate Efficacy and Safety of ITF2984 in Acromegalic Patients [NCT02111044]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Selective Intra-arterial Injection of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients With Liver Metastases [NCT03724409]Early Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-11Terminated(stopped due to Pandemic)
Adjuvant Use of Autologous Platelet-rich Fibrin Glue in the Treatment of Fistulas and Anastomotic Leakages of the Digestive Tract [NCT01561066]Phase 1122 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Phase III Study in Patients With Advanced Carcinoid Tumor Receiving Octreotide Depot and Everolimus 10 mg/Day or Octreotide Depot and Placebo [NCT00412061]Phase 3429 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
A Phase II Clinical and Biologic Study of AMG 706 and Octreotide in Patients With Low-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT00427349]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-07Completed
Investigation of the Developmental, Nutritional and Hormonal Regulation of Ghrelin in Children and Young Adults With Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS): Octreotide Intervention Sub-study [NCT00399893]5 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Inadequate recruitment)
Treatment With Octreotide in Patients With Lymphangioleiomyomatosis [NCT00005906]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-06-30Completed
Impact of Somatostatin Analogs vs. Surgery on Glucose Metabolism in Acromegaly: Results of a 5 Years Observational, Open, Prospective Study [NCT00703079]100 participants (Actual)Observational1997-01-31Completed
PANasta Trial Cattell-Warren Versus Blumgart Techniques of Pancreatico-jejunostomy Following Pancreato-duodenectomy - a Double Blinded Multi Centred Trial [NCT02457156]Phase 3506 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-04-30Active, not recruiting
Open Label Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of an Octreotide Implant in Patients With Carcinoid Syndrome [NCT00884715]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Program was terminated for business reasons)
Octreotide for Management of Bronchorrhea in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02916433]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
Yttrium-90 DOTA-TOC Intra-arterial (IA) Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) for Neuroendocrine Tumor [NCT03197012]Early Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-01Completed
A Prospective Randomized, Placebo (Saline)-Controlled, Balanced, 3-treatment Regimen Crossover Study Comparing the Effects of Prolonged (13 h) Hyperglucagonemia With Those of Acute (3 hr) Hyperglucagonemia on Energy Expenditure and Endogenous Glucose Prot [NCT02237053]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health [NCT05171751]50 participants (Actual)Observational2021-11-01Completed
PHASE IIIB, OPEN-LABEL, MULTICENTER STUDY TO EVALUATE THE LONG-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF AN 84-MG OCTREOTIDE SUBCUTANEOUS HYDROGEL IMPLANT IN SUBJECTS WITH ACROMEGALY [NCT01295060]Phase 312 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Program was terminated for business reasons)
Hemodynamic Effects of Terlipressin and High Dose Octreotide on Patients With Liver Cirrhosis Related Esophageal Varices: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Trial [NCT02119884]Phase 488 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
Randomized, Open, Positive Control Phase III Clinical Trial of Lutetium (177Lu) Oxodotreotide Injection Combined With Standard-dose Long-acting Octreotide Versus High-dose Long-acting Octreotide in the Treatment of Somatostatin Receptor-positive Advanced [NCT05884255]Phase 3220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-06Recruiting
Activity and Safety of Everolimus in Combination With Octreotide LAR and Metformin in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Well-differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors (pWDNETs): a Phase II, Open, Monocentric, Prospective Study [NCT02294006]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of 68Ga-DOTATOC Positron Emission Tomography (PET) CT in Children and Young Adults With Brain Tumors [NCT02194452]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Withdrawn
Comparative Effectiveness Research: Effects of Terlipressin When Usual Somatostatin or Octreotide Dose Fails to Treat the Patients With Acute Variceal Bleeding [NCT02311608]1,320 participants (Anticipated)Observational2014-02-28Recruiting
Studio Esplorativo Monocentrico Non Controllato, in Aperto, Volto a Sviluppare e Valutare l'Applicazione di Una Tecnica Innovativa di Rimozione Radioguidata Dei Tumori Neuroendocrini Gastro-entero-pancreatici [NCT04296149]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-16Completed
A Phase 2 Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of 212Pb-DOTAMTATE in Subjects With Somatostatin Receptor Expressing Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT05153772]Phase 268 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-21Recruiting
A Phase III Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lutathera in Patients With Grade 2 and Grade 3 Advanced GEP-NET [NCT03972488]Phase 3222 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-22Active, not recruiting
Phase III Prospective Randomized Comparison of Depot Octreotide Plus Interferon Alpha Versus Depot Octreotide Plus Bevacizumab (NSC #704865) in Advanced, Poor Prognosis Carcinoid Patients [NCT00569127]Phase 3427 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-01Active, not recruiting
A Study of 18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/CT for Imaging Neuroendocrine Neoplasms [NCT03511768]Phase 1/Phase 265 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-02Recruiting
A Study Comparing Treatment With Lutetium[177Lu] Oxodotreotide Injection to Octreotide LAR in Patients With Inoperable, Progressive, , Well Differentiated, Somatostatin Receptor Positive Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours [NCT05459844]Phase 3196 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-31Recruiting
Hepatic Hemodynamic Responses to Long-acting Octreotide in Patients With Cirrhosis Hepatic Hemodynamic Responses to Long-acting Octreotide in Patients With Cirrhosis [NCT01188733]Phase 1/Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-06-30Completed
A Phase 1, Non-Randomized, Open-Label, Dose Escalation, Single-Center Study to Determine the Safety, Bio-distribution, and Preliminary Effectiveness of AlphaMedix™ in Adult Subjects With SSRT(+) NETs. [NCT03466216]Phase 133 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-05Recruiting
An Observational Study Investigating Recurrence Rates of Type I Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated With Long-acting Somatostatin Analogs [NCT03812939]30 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-01-01Recruiting
"Efficacy of Octreotide in the Prevention of Postoperative Complications After Pancreaticodudenectomy in Patients With Soft Pancreas and Non-dilated Pancreatic Duct: A Prospective Randomized Trial" [NCT02474914]104 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Impact of Pasireotide on Postoperative Pancreatic Fistulas Following Distal Resections [NCT04281680]258 participants (Actual)Observational2014-07-01Completed
Terlipressin + Albumin Versus Midodrine + Octreotide in the Treatment of Hepatorenal Syndrome (HRS): An Open Multicentric Randomized Study [NCT00742339]Phase 2/Phase 349 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Decision of independent monitoring committee: Risk of non-response to treatment significantly higher in midodrine group than in terlipressin group.)
Comparison of 2 Days Versus 5 Days of Octreotide After Endoscopic Therapy in Preventing Early Esophageal Varices Rebleed: A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT05199038]Phase 4184 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-30Not yet recruiting
Effect of Octreotide on Saliva [NCT05340192]Phase 14 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-24Completed
Does Surgical Debulking Of Pituitary Adenomas Improve Responsiveness To Octreotide LAR In The Treatment Of Acromegaly: An Investigator-Initiated Study [NCT01371643]Phase 441 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Role of Hyperinsulinemia in NAFLD: Dexamethasone-Pancreatic Clamp Pilot & Feasibility Study [NCT06126354]Phase 116 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Control Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Combining Hemospray With Medical Standard of Care Treatment in the Management of Acute Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhotic Patients. [NCT03061604]105 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Phase II Study of RAD001 Plus Octreotide Depot in Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable Low Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (Carcinoid, Islet Cell) [NCT00113360]Phase 267 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in Tumors With High Expression of Somatostatin Receptors [NCT04790708]250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-02Recruiting
Randomized Phase II Study of Octreotide LAR as Maintenance Treatment After First-line Chemotherapy for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Gastro-entero-pancreatic or Esophageal Neuroendocrine Carcinomas [NCT02409849]Phase 292 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-04-30Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1, Open-label, Single-center, 2-period, Single Sequence Drug-drug Interaction Study to Evaluate the Effects of Octreotide Acetate Injection (Sandostatin®) on the Pharmacokinetics of Single-dose Telotristat Etiprate in Healthy Male and Female Subje [NCT02195635]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Real-world Effectiveness of Adjuvant Octreotide Therapy in High Recurrence Risk Patients With Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT06080204]411 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Phase 1b/3 Global, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Trial Comparing Treatment With RYZ101 to Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects With Inoperable, Advanced, SSTR+, Well-differentiated GEP-NETs That Have Progressed Following Prior 177Lu-SSA Therapy [NCT05477576]Phase 3288 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-24Recruiting
Vasoconstrictors as Alternatives to Albumin After Large Volume Paracentesis in Cirrhosis [NCT00108355]Phase 429 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Replace Sandostatine® in Three Daily Subcutaneous Injections by a Single Intramuscular Injection of Sandostatine® LP Per Month in Patients With a Diffuse Form of Hyperinsulinism [NCT00987168]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Ghrelin Suppression by Sandostatin LAR® Depot (Octreotide Acetate for Injectable Suspension) in Patients With Prader-Willi Syndrome [NCT01613495]2 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Active, not recruiting
Multicenter, Randomised Open Trial Comparing the Efficacy of a Medical Treatment With Sandostatin LP 30 mg Performed Before Surgery to a Prime Line transsphenoïdal Surgery in Previously Untreated Acromegalic Patients With Either a Micro or a Macro Pituita [NCT01029275]89 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Octreotide Improves Human Lymphatic Fluid Transport a Translational Trial [NCT05683444]Early Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-01Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Two Tier Study of IMC-A12 in Combination With Depot Octreotide in Patients With Metastatic, Well or Moderately Differentiated Carcinoid or Islet Cell Carcinoma [NCT00781911]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Phase II Study of Octreotide Treatment of Advanced, Recurrent Thymoma [NCT00003283]Phase 238 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-10-13Completed
Phase II Study of [90Y-DOTA]-TOC and [177Lu-DOTA]-TOC in Metastasized Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT00978211]Phase 21,499 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-09-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of High Dose Regimen of Octreotide LAR in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors in Progressive Disease: A Phase II, Open, Multicentric Prospective Study [NCT00990535]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
A Phase 1b Study in Patients With Acromegaly or Functioning Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs) to Characterize the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Tolerability of Debio 4126, a 12-week Prolonged-release Octreotide Formu [NCT05364944]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-18Active, not recruiting
Treatment of Orthostatic Intolerance [NCT00262470]Phase 1/Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-04-30Active, not recruiting
An Open Label, Stratified, Single-arm Phase II Study of Everolimus in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (NET) After Failure of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy [NCT00363051]Phase 2160 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Effect of Hyperglycemia on Microvascular Perfusion in Healthy Adults [NCT03520569]Early Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-04Completed
Clinical Study of the Use of Yttrium-90 (90Y) and/or Lutecium-177 (177Lu) DOTATATE (DOTA-0-Tyr3-Octreotate) in the Treatment of Disseminated and / or Symptomatic Tumors With Somatostatin Receptor Overexpression [NCT04029428]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-11-02Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Blinded Efficacy and Safety Study of Pasireotide LAR vs Octreotide LAR in Patients With Metastatic Carcinoid Tumors Whose Disease-related Symptoms Are Inadequately Controlled by Somatostatin Analogues. [NCT00690430]Phase 3186 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Response of a Hydrated and Non-Hydrated 84mg Octreotide Implant in Patients With Acromegaly [NCT00913055]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Co-treatment With Pegvisomant and a Somatostatin Analogue (SA) in SA-responsive Acromegalic Patients: Impact on Insulin Sensitivity, Glucose Tolerance, and Pharmacoeconomics [NCT00652379]18 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate Maintenance of Response, Safety and Patient Reported Outcomes in Acromegaly Patients Treated With Octreotide Capsules vs. Parenteral Somatostatin Receptor Ligands [NCT02685709]Phase 3146 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
Angiotensin 2 as a Novel Treatment for Hepatorenal Syndrome [NCT04048707]Phase 248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-01Not yet recruiting
Safety and Biological Activity of a New Prolonged Release Formulation of Octreotide Acetate, C2l-OCT-01 PR, Administered Intra Muscularly Every 4, 5 or 6 Weeks in Acromegalic Patients [NCT00642421]Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-02-29Terminated(stopped due to Commercial reasons)
Randomized Trial of High-Dose Versus Conventional Dose Octreotide Acetate Versus Loperamide in the Treatment of Chemotherpay-Related Diarrhea in Patients With Colorectal Cancer [NCT00003057]Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-03-26Completed
LARCID: Evaluation of Octreotide LAR in Prevention of Chemotherapy-induced Diarrhea [NCT00582426]Phase 3139 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Comparison of Octreotide and Standard Therapy vs. Standard Therapy Alone for the Treatment of Hypoglycemia in Patients Taking Sulfonylureas or a Combination of Insulin and Sulfonylureas Presenting to the Emergency Department [NCT00804297]Phase 340 participants Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Food Intake and Gut Hormone Release in Patients in Cancer Remission Who Have Undergone Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery [NCT02385617]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Randomised, Open-label, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Medical Treatment With Octreotide Acetate 30 mg Administered Every 21 Days for 6 Months With That of Octreotide Acetate 60 mg Administered Every 28 Days for 6 Months in Acrom [NCT00372697]Phase 328 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Changes in Pancreatic Texture After Single-shot Administration of 500 µg Octreotide in the Gastroduodenal Artery During Pancreatoduodenectomy - a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01400100]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Investigation of the Effects of Obesity Surgery on Appetitive Behaviour - Impact of Gut Hormones [NCT02010385]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
An Uncontrolled, Pilot-study Assessing the Efficacy of Octreotide Long-acting Release to Decrease Transfusion Requirements and Endoscopy Frequency in Patients With Rendu-Osler-Weber and Gastrointestinal Bleeding [NCT02874326]Phase 215 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study Of Octreotide Acetate (Sandostatin) (SMS) As A Biomodulator Of Doxorubicin (DOX) [NCT00008073]Phase 10 participants Interventional1996-01-31Completed
Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Phase III-Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Octreotide in Patients With Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT00386984]Phase 3108 participants Interventional1999-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Effects of Octreotide Acetate on Circulating Levels of Chromogranin A in Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT00166725]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
Effect of Somatostatin on Ghrelin Concentrations, Food Seeking Behaviour and Weight in Patients With Prader-Willi Syndrome [NCT00175305]Phase 310 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-08-31Terminated
A Randomized, Open Label, Controlled Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Octreotide i.m. in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) After Start of Laser Coagulation [NCT00170742]Phase 317 participants Interventional2003-12-31Terminated(stopped due to trial stopped on Sept 24, 2007)
Impact of Prophylactic Octreotide to Pancreatic Exocrine Secretion and Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy [NCT02920567]282 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-01-31Recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of Octreotide Compared to Placebo in Patients With Inoperable Bowel Obstruction Due to Peritoneal Carcinomatosis [NCT00332696]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Ascending, Multidose Study To Determine Safety and Tolerability of Orally Administered LX1606 in Subjects With Symptomatic Carcinoid Syndrome Refractory to Stable-Dose Octreotide Long-A [NCT00853047]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Predictive Value of 3 Months Results on 12 Months Tumor Shrinkage After First-Line Octreotide-LAR Therapy in Patients With Acromegaly [NCT00616408]61 participants (Actual)Observational1997-01-31Completed
Pharmacodynamics Of Product Octreotide Acetate Lar 30 Mg, Imported And Distributed By The Laboratory Chemical Pharm. Bergamo, Compared To Product Sandostatin LAR®30 MG Manufactured By Novartis Biosciences S/A [NCT01086982]Phase 116 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-03-31Suspended
Sandostatin LAR vs. Surgery in Acromegalics With Macroadenoma [NCT00001860]Phase 25 participants Interventional1999-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of LF-PB 10 mg, 20 mg, and 30 mg to Treat Lymphorrhea Post Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer [NCT01754285]Phase 2114 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
The Use of Midodrine, Octreotide and Albumin in Refractory Ascites [NCT00240045]Phase 2/Phase 39 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Long-acting Release Octreotide in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT00241020]Phase 3270 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
Combination of Everolimus and Octreotide LAR in Aggressive Recurrent Meningiomas. [NCT02333565]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-22Completed
Open Label Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Octreotide Acetate in Patients With Acromegaly, With Micro or Macroadenomas [NCT00242541]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Terminated
Evaluation and Treatment of Autonomic Failure. [NCT00223691]Phase 1389 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
PHASE II TRIAL OF FLUDARABINE AND SANDOSTATIN FOR RELAPSED LOW-GRADE NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA [NCT00002779]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-02-28Completed
RCT for the Effect of Early Administration of Vasoactive Substances When Combined With Endoscopic Treatment in Acute Gastro-esophageal Variceal Bleeds: Comparisons Among Terlipressin, Somatostatin, and Octreotide [NCT00966355]Phase 41,034 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Dose, 3-Period, 4 Treatment Incomplete Crossover Study to Assess the Effects of Single Oral Doses of L-001241689 on Glucagon-Induced Glycemic Excursion in Healthy Male Subjects Following Intravenous A [NCT02012166]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Comparison of 24-hours Versus 72-hours of Octreotide Infusion Along With Endoscopic Therapy in Preventing Early Rebleed From Esophageal Varices: a Multi-center, Randomized Clinical Study [NCT03624517]Phase 4160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-19Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Safety and Immunogenicity of Survivin Long Peptide Vaccine (SurVaxM) in Patients With Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) [NCT03879694]Phase 114 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-17Recruiting
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study in Women With Irritable Bowel Syndrome to Evaluate Feasibility and Reproducibility of Barostat Assessments of Colorectal Sensation During Colorectal Distention and Its Pharmacol [NCT00584298]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Double-blind Pasireotide LAR 40 mg and Pasireotide LAR 60 mg Versus Open-label Octreotide LAR or Lanreotide ATG in Patients With Inadequately Controlled Acrome [NCT01137682]Phase 3198 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-19Completed
Study to Investigate the Antiproliferative Effect of Octreotide in Patients With Metastasized Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Midgut [NCT00171873]Phase 385 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
[NCT02217839]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
The Effect of Acute Application of Pegvisomant Alone and in Combination With Octreotide on Endogenous GH Levels During a 6 Hour Test in Patients With Acromegaly on Constant Pegvisomant Treatment [NCT00595140]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Role of Octreotide Intravenous Infusion in Non-variceal GI Bleeding in ICU [NCT06062719]Phase 2/Phase 356 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-23Recruiting
The Effect of Satiety Gut Hormone Modulation on Appetitive Drive After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery [NCT02381249]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
A Multicentre, Double Blind, Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial to Assess the Effect of LF-PB on Seroma Formation in Women With Breast Cancer Undergoing Axillary Lymph Node Dissection [NCT02668588]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-22Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Blinded Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Pasireotide LAR vs. Octreotide LAR in Patients With Active Acromegaly [NCT00600886]Phase 3358 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-11Completed
An Open-Label Extension Trial of IONIS GHR-LRx, an Antisense Inhibitor of the Growth Hormone Receptor Administered Monthly Subcutaneously to Patients With Acromegaly Being Treated With Long-Acting Somatostatin Receptor Ligands (SRL) [NCT03967249]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-25Completed
Efficacy And Safety Of Terlipressin Vs Octreotide As Adjuvant Therapy In Bleeding Esophageal Varices [NCT00534677]Phase 4320 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Efficacy of Medical Treatment With Octreotide in Patients With Primary Inoperable Thymoma to Reduce Tumor Size [NCT00332969]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Pilot, Phase II Study With a Prospective, Randomized, Cross-Over, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Design to Assess the Short-Term Effects of Tolvaptan Plus Placebo vs Tolvaptan Plus Octreotide LAR Combination Therapy in ADPKD Patients With Normal Kidne [NCT03541447]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-12Completed
Metabolic, Cardiovascular and Body Composition Effects of Sandostatin LAR® Therapy of Acromegaly, Effect of Reduction of Serum Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) Levels Into a New Normative Range [NCT01424241]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-08-31Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover, Open Label Dose Finding Study to Compare the Safety, Efficacy and PK/PD Relationship of Multiple Doses of SOM230 and Sandostatin in Acromegalic Patients [NCT00088582]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Phase 1 Trial Using 131I MIBG and 90Y DOTATOC in a Dosimetrically Determined Optimal Combination for Therapy of Selected Patients With Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors. [NCT03044977]Early Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-07Active, not recruiting
A Phase III, Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Open, Parallel Group Comparison of Lanreotide Autogel® (90 and 120 mg) Administered by Deep Subcutaneous Injection Every Four Weeks, With Sandostatin LAR Depot (20 and 30 mg) Administered by Intramuscular [NCT00092287]Phase 34 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Terminated
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Sandostatin LAR Depot for the Prevention of Irinotecan-Induced Diarrhea in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00006269]Phase 389 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-12-31Terminated
Functional MRI-based Assessment of Terlipressin vs. Octreotide on Renal Function in Cirrhotic Patients With Acute Variceal Bleeding (CHESS1903): A Multicenter, Single-blind, Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT04028323]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-16Recruiting
Open Label, Randomized Study Comparing the Biological Efficacy & Safety of a New Prolonged Release Formulation of Octreotide Acetate, C2L-OCT-01 PR, 30 mg Administered Every 42 Days for 84 Days With Sandostatin LAR 30 mg Administered Every 28 Days for 84 [NCT00616551]Phase 365 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Incidence of Medical and Nutritional Complications After Bariatric Surgery, Especially Focusing on Assessment and Treatment of Severe Hypoglycemia [NCT01865760]33 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
A Within Group, Randomised, Phase I, Repeated Doses, Placebo and Octreotide Controlled Study in Healthy Volunteers to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics After Incremental Doses of ITF2984 [NCT01871844]Phase 146 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Dosimetry Based PRRT Versus Standard Dose PRRT With Lu-177-DOTATOC in NEN Patients- a Randomized Study; a Step Towards Tailored PRRT [NCT04917484]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-01Recruiting
Validation of 99mTc- EDDA - HYNIC -TOC Kits for Diagnosis of Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT02691078]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
A Phase I , Open Label, Single Center, Dose Escalation Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of a Single Dose of a New Extended Long-acting Formulation of Octreotide Pamoate Administered i.m. in Healthy Cholecystectomized Volunteer [NCT00432068]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Phase 2 Study of Long Acting Octreotide in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis [NCT00463983]Phase 1/Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Clinical Trial of Sir-Spheres® in Patients With Symptomatic or Progressive Hepatic Metastases From Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT00466856]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Terminated(stopped due to due to slow accrual)
Preoperative Octreotide Treatment of Patients With Growth Hormone Producing Pituitary Adenomas [NCT00521300]Phase 462 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-09-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Octreotide in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Surgery: Effect on Blood Loss, Need for Vasoactive Drugs, Transfusion Requirements. [NCT06085976]Phase 262 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-14Recruiting
Pros & Cons of Norepinephrine Infusion Versus Midodrine & Octreotide in Patients With Hepatorenal Syndrome Type 1 in Intensive Care Unit. [NCT03455322]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-15Completed
GI-072: Randomized Controlled Trial of the Use of Octreotide to Enhance Liver Recovery After Major Hepatectomy [NCT03179995]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-07Terminated(stopped due to Grantor closed study)
A Phase II Study of Octreotide Acetate for the Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT00257426]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
An Open-label, Two-step, Multicenter European Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sandostatin LAR at High Dose or in Combination Either With GH-receptor Antagonist or Dopamine-agonist in Acromegalic Patients Not Adequately Controlled by Conventio [NCT01278342]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
The Effect of Preoperative Long Period Octreotide Combined With Postoperative Short Period Octreotide on the Complications After Pancreatectomy. A Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial [NCT03398941]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-01Recruiting
A Phase II Clinical Trial of Cabazitaxel Plus Prednisone With Octreotide in the Treatment of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) Previously Treated With Docetaxel [NCT01469338]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Terminated(stopped due to lack of funding)
a Prospective Study on the Efficacy and Safety Using Sequential Therapy of Irinotecan Combined With Cisplatin (IP)and Octretide Lar in the First Line Treatment of Metastatic or Inoperable Gastrointestinal Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: th [NCT01480986]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Octreotide LAR Depot in Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) Associate Gastrointestinal (GI) [NCT01707225]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
[NCT00076362]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
An Open-label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Octreotide Acetate in Microspheres in the Therapy of Patients With Moderately Severe or Severe Non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR) or Low Risk Proliferative Diabe [NCT00248131]Phase 3260 participants Interventional2005-11-30Terminated
A Study To Compare The Efficacy And Safety Of Pegvisomant To That Of Sandostatin Lar Depot In Patients With Acromegaly [NCT00068042]Phase 4100 participants Interventional2003-04-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Clinical Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Octreotide in Decreasing Blood and Iron Requirements in Patients With Refractory Anemia Due to Angiodysplasias [NCT02384122]Phase 362 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
[NCT00094146]Phase 2160 participants Interventional2002-01-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Octreotide LAR in Treatment Naïve Acromegalic Patients [NCT00128232]Phase 3100 participants Interventional2002-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Controlled Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Octreotide Acetate in Microspheres in the Therapy of Patients With Moderately Severe or Severe Non-proliferate Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR) or Low Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) [NCT00130845]Phase 3312 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-02-29Completed
Beneficial Effect of Dose Escalation of Octreotide-LAR as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Resistant Acromegaly [NCT00461149]Phase 450 participants Interventional1995-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Controlled Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Octreotide Acetate in Microspheres in the Therapy of Patients With Moderately Severe or Severe Non-proliferate Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR) or Low Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) [NCT00131144]Phase 3583 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-11-30Completed
Circulating Tumor Cells and Tumor DNA in HCC and NET - Patient-specific Biomarkers for Clinical Decision Support and Tailored Relapse Diagnostics [NCT02973204]167 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2016-11-30Completed
Role of Hyperinsulinemia in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Pathogenesis: Pancreatic Clamp Pilot & Feasibility Study [NCT05724134]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-29Recruiting
An Open-label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Octreotide Acetate in Microspheres in the Therapy of Patients With Moderately Severe or Severe Non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR) or Low Risk Proliferative Diabe [NCT00248157]Phase 3105 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Inconsistent treatment benefit)
Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Depot Somatostatin Analogues: a Pilot Prospective Study Based on Somatostatin Receptors Tumors Expression [NCT00495846]Phase 2/Phase 325 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
A Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Dose Titration Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sandostatin (SMS 201-995) in the Treatment of Patients With Acquired Immunodeficiency Related Diarrhea [NCT00002252]0 participants InterventionalCompleted
[NCT00050635]Phase 4150 participants Interventional2002-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Parallel Group, Three-Arm Study To Evaluate Treatment With A Combination Of Pegvisomant Plus Sandostatin Lar, Pegvisomant (Alone), And Sandostatin Lar (Alone) In Patients With Acromegaly [NCT00068029]Phase 475 participants Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study To Determine The Efficacy Of Sandostatin LAR® Depot (Octreotide Acetate) In Preventing Or Reducing The Severity Of Chemoradiation-Induced Diarrhea In Patients With Anal Or Rectal Cancer [NCT00075868]Phase 3233 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Macro and Microcirculatory Effects of the Combination of Norepinephrine and Octreotide for the Treatment of Cirrhotic Patients With Hemorrhagic Shock [NCT03891849]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-01Withdrawn(stopped due to No participant enrolled. Equipment unvailable.)
Hemodynamic Profile of Terlipressin and Octreotide in Patients With Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension. A Randomised, Single Blinded Clinical Trial. [NCT04353193]Phase 436 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-30Not yet recruiting
A Phase I, Open Label, Maximum Tolerated Dose-Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of 90Y-DOTA-tyr3-Octreotide Administered by Intravenous Infusion to Children With Refractory Somatostatin-Receptor Positive Tumors [NCT00049023]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
Phase III Double-Blind Study Of Depot Octreotide Versus Placebo In The Prevention Of Acute Diarrhea In Patients Receiving Pelvic Radiation Therapy [NCT00033605]Phase 3130 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-04-30Completed
Comparable Effects of Lanreotide Autogel and Octreotide LAR on GH, IGF-I Levels and Patient Satisfaction - A Twelve Month Randomized Cross-Over Study in Patients With Acromegaly [NCT00145405]Phase 412 participants Interventional2002-09-30Completed
A Study of Octreotide Depot vs Saline Control in Pediatric Hypothalamic Obesity Patients [NCT00171613]Phase 432 participants Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Octreotide Efficacy and Safety in First-line Acromegalic Patients [NCT00171886]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-07-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Long-acting Repeatable Octreotide Acetate for Injectable Suspension vs. Surgery in Treatment-naïve Patients With Acromegaly [NCT00225979]Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Phase II Study of Vatalanib and Octreotide in Patients With Progressive Low-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT00227773]Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn
A Phase II, Open-label, Multicentre, Randomised Study of the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy, and Safety of CAM2029 in Patients With Acromegaly and Neuroendocrine Tumours (NETs) Previously Treated With Sandostatin® LAR® [NCT02299089]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Stress, Diurnal Cortisol, and Breast Cancer Survival [NCT00226967]115 participants (Anticipated)Observational2002-09-08Completed
[NCT02217826]Phase 18 participants (Actual)InterventionalCompleted
Randomized Evaluation of Octreotide Versus Compazine for Emergency Department Treatment of Migraine Headache [NCT00274170]Phase 1/Phase 256 participants Interventional2006-01-31Recruiting
Trial of Thalidomide, a- Interferon +/- Octreotide in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT00250796]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-09-30Completed
Phase II, Dosimetry-Guided, Peptide Receptor Radiotherapy (PRRT) With 90Y-DOTA- tyr3-Octreotide (90Y-DOTATOC) in Children and Adults With Neuroendocrine and Other Somatostatin Receptor Expressing Tumors [NCT03013387]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to This project has undergone a significant amount of updates and has been resubmitted under IRB# 201708778)
A Randomized, Multi-center, Open-label, Active-controlled Phase 3 Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Octreotide Subcutaneous Depot (CAM2029) Versus Octreotide LAR or Lanreotide ATG in Patients With GEP-NET [NCT05050942]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-22Recruiting
Treatment of Acromegaly With Somatostatin Analogs: GH vs. IGF-I as Primary Biochemical Target [NCT01618513]Phase 484 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
[NCT02374632]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II/III Randomized Double-blind Study of Sandostatin LAR in Combination With Axitinib Versus Sandostatin LAR With Placebo in Patients With Advanced G1-G2 Neuroendocrine Tumours (WHO 2010) of Non-pancreatic Origin [NCT01744249]Phase 2/Phase 3255 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-11-30Active, not recruiting
The Effect of Obesity-induced Cytokine Elevation on the Molecular Regulation of Protein Turnover and Carbohydrate Metabolism in Human Skeletal Muscle [NCT02305069]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Study to Determine Whether Ultrasound Guidance Improves Delivery and Efficacy of Intramuscular Injection of Long-Acting Octreotide in the Treatment of Acromegaly [NCT00552071]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
The Effect of Subcutaneous Infusions of 3 Doses of a Novel Somatostatin Analogue, DG3173, on Growth Hormone Levels in Untreated Acromegalics [NCT02217800]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
Prospective Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Study of the Efficacy of Octreotide in Prevention of Salivary Fistulae After Post Radiation Salvage Surgery [NCT02437825]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Recruiting
A Pilot Study To Evaluate Patient Experience With the Somatostatin Analogs Octreotide Long Acting Release and Lanreotide During the Treatment of Advanced, Nonfunctional, Well Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT03289741]Phase 453 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-19Completed
"A Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Double Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sandostatin ( SMS 201-995 ) in Patients With Acquired Immunodeficiency Related Diarrhea Who Were Either Responders or Non-Responders in a Prior Placebo-Controlled [NCT00002253]0 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Phase II Study of Ramucirumab With Somatostatin Analog Therapy in Patients With Advanced, Progressive Carcinoid Tumors [NCT02795858]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-14Active, not recruiting
An Expanded Access Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors Using 68Ga-DOTA-TOC [NCT03001349]Early Phase 14 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-16Terminated(stopped due to Per PI Request)
A Two-Part, Phase 1, Randomized, Crossover Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Intranasal Octreotide (DP1038) Versus Subcutaneous Sandostatin® Injection in Healthy Adult Volunteers [NCT03031535]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
Phase III, Open-Label, Multicenter International Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Octreotide Implant vs. Sandostatin LAR Depot in Patients With Acromegaly [NCT00765323]Phase 3169 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Terminated
Sandostatin (Octreotide LAR) May Lead to Clinical Improvement Through Receptor Occupation Optimisation A Prospective Interventional Trial of Patients With Neuro-endocrine Tumors With Carcinoid Syndrome Receiving Octreotide LAR [NCT04140409]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-02Terminated(stopped due to Slow recruitment)
Phase II Study of Above-Label Octreotide-LAR in Patients With Insufficiently Controlled Carcinoid Syndrome [NCT01886287]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
IMMUNeOCT Study: Octreotide LAR in the Induction of Immunologic Response in Patient With Neuroendocrine Tumors: an Interventional Pharmacological Study [NCT04129255]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-28Completed
A Study of the Effect of Ascending Single Doses of DG3173 and 300 μg of Octreotide on Human Growth Hormone Levels in Untreated Acromegalics. [NCT02235987]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
Evaluation of Gallium-68 DOTA-TOC Imaging of Somatostatin Receptor Positive Malignancies [NCT02177773]Phase 1/Phase 2300 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-23Terminated(stopped due to FDA approved agent for this indication during enrollment)
Evaluation of Impact of Sandostatin® Injection Before Axillary Clearance on Lymphocele Formation In Patients With Breast Cancer [NCT03791736]4 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-06Terminated(stopped due to The surgical technique is no longer used)
Phase II, Dosimetry Guided, Peptide Receptor Radiotherapy (PRRT) Using 90Y-DOTA tyr3-Octreotide (90Y-DOTATOC) in Children and Adults With Neuroendocrine and Other Somatostatin Receptor Positive Tumors [NCT03273712]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-29Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multi-center Trial to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Octreotide Subcutaneous Depot (CAM2029) in Patients With Symptomatic Polycystic Liver Disease [NCT05281328]Phase 2/Phase 369 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-28Recruiting
An Exploratory, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Depot Octreotide (Sandostatin LARDepot) for Symptomatic Ascites in Cancer Patients [NCT00182754]Phase 333 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Effect of Octreotide on the Colonic Motility in Pediatric Patients [NCT01917773]Phase 413 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Comparator Study of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT With Octreoscan + High-resolution, Contrast-enhanced CT for Diagnosis and Staging in Neuroendocrine Tumors and Other Somatostatin Receptor Positive Tumors [NCT01869725]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-01Completed
A Randomized Trial of Antiestrogen Therapy Versus Combined Antiestrogen and Octreotide Therapy in the Adjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer in Post-Menopausal Women [NCT00002864]Phase 3667 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-09-24Completed
[NCT00004327]Phase 28 participants Interventional1995-01-31Completed
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Benefit of Adding Octreotide (SMS 201-995 PA LAR) to Tamoxifen Alone or to Tamoxifen and Chemotherapy in Patients With Axillary Node-Negative, Estrogen-Receptor-Positive, Primary Invasive Breast Cancer [NCT00002967]Phase 30 participants Interventional1997-05-31Completed
Octreotide Treatment to Improve Nutritional Recovery After Surgery for Patients With Esophageal or Gastric Cancer, a Prospective Randomized Open Label Phase II Study - OTIS [NCT04871204]Phase 2152 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-16Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Octreotide Capsules in Patients Who Demonstrated Biochemical Control on Injectable Somatostatin Receptor Ligands (SRL) Treatment [NCT03252353]Phase 356 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-01Active, not recruiting
Fecal Calprotectin Levels in Mycophenolate Mofetil Induced Diarrhea and Treatment With Octreotide [NCT02977897]10 participants (Anticipated)Observational2017-01-31Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter, Single Arm, Proof of Concept Study to Investigate the Efficacy of an 8 Month Combination Therapy of Octreotide and Cabergoline in Acromegalic Patients Only Partially Responsive to Somatostatin Analog Monotherapy [NCT00376064]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy Study of 68Ga-Dotatoc Positron Emission Tomography for Diagnosis for Staging, Restaging and Assessment of Response to Treatment in Somatostatin Receptor-Positive Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT02359500]Phase 171 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Terminated(stopped due to compound no longer available)
Pilot Study Of Long-Acting Octreotide (Octreotide LAR® Depot) In The Treatment Of Patients With Severe Polycystic Liver Disease [NCT00426153]Phase 2/Phase 342 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Monocentric Interventionnal Pilot Study Pilot Study Evaluating Somatostatin Receptor's PET Imaging to Detect Inflammatory Phases of Myocarditis [NCT03347760]33 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-13Recruiting
Long-term (up to 3 Years) Clinical and Hormonal Outcomes in Acromegalic Patients With Treated Surgery With or Without Long Acting Somatostatin Analogues: Open-labeled, Prospective, Parallel Group Study [NCT02427295]Phase 41 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-03-31Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Trial to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Octreotide Subcutaneous Depot (CAM2029) in Patients With Acromegaly [NCT04076462]Phase 372 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-14Completed
Al18F-NOTA-octreotide PET Imaging of the Somatostatin Receptor in Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT04552847]Phase 2/Phase 385 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-07Completed
Application of Al18F-octreotide PET/CT in Neuroendocrine Tumor [NCT05749289]Phase 150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-20Recruiting
A Phase 3, Open-label, Single-arm, Multi-center Trial to Assess the Long-term Safety of Octreotide Subcutaneous Depot (CAM2029) in Patients With Acromegaly [NCT04125836]Phase 3135 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-10Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of the Combination of Bevacizumab, Pertuzumab, and Sandostatin for Patients With Advanced Neuroendocrine Cancers. [NCT01121939]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Palliative Management of Inoperable Malignant Bowel Obstruction: A Prospective, Open Label, Phase-2 Study at an NCI Comprehensive Cancer Center [NCT04027348]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-26Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
A Pilot Study Of Ga-68-DOTA-TOC Imaging In Participants With Small Bowel Carcinoid Tumors [NCT03057509]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Slow accrual)
A Phase II Study of the Somatostatin Analog Sandostatin LAR in Patients With Androgen Independent Prostate Cancer [NCT00510224]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Stopped at interim analyses phase due to lack of efficacy)
An Open-label, Multi-center Everolimus Roll-over Protocol for Patients Who Have Completed a Previous Novartis-sponsored Everolimus Study and Are Judged by the Investigator to Benefit From Continued Everolimus Treatment [NCT01789281]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-14Completed
Prevention of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula by SOMATOSTATIN Compared to OCTREOTIDE: Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study [NCT03000946]Phase 3655 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-15Completed
Randomized Phase II Study of Everolimus Alone Versus Everolimus Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT01229943]Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-15Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Octreolin™ in Patients With Acromegaly Who Are Currently Receiving Parenteral Somatostatin Analogs [NCT01412424]Phase 3155 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Octreotide for Palliation of Inoperable Bowel Obstruction: A Phase II Study [NCT00004895]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-10-31Completed
Nor-epinephrine Versus Midodrine/Octreotide in Patients With Hepatorenal Acute Kidney Injury [NCT04522297]91 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-15Completed
A Single-dose Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Octreotide Injection in Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT05761431]Phase 156 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-03-02Completed
A Randomised, Multicentre, Open Label, Phase II Study of Prophylactic Octreotide to Prevent or Reduce the Frequency and Severity of Diarrhoea in Subjects Receiving Lapatinib With Capecitabine for the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT02294786]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-17Terminated
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00005906 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Reduction in Total Tumor Volume of at Least 20%.
NCT00005906 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Reduction of Pain/Symptoms as Measured by a Simple Numeric Symptom Distress Scale (NDS) to Rate the Severity of Individual Symptoms.
NCT00005906 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Liver Function Abnormalities
NCT00108355 (2) [back to overview]Time to Recurrence of Ascites.
NCT00108355 (2) [back to overview]Development of Post-paracentesis Circulatory Dysfunction (PCD)
NCT00113360 (1) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00171873 (1) [back to overview]Time to Tumor Progression Documented by Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
NCT00182754 (3) [back to overview]Median Time to Paracentesis
NCT00182754 (3) [back to overview]Number of Paracenteses
NCT00182754 (3) [back to overview]Average Quality-of-life
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview]Participant's Quality of Life Using the Edmonton Scale
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview]Number of Vomiting Episodes Per Day at Day1, Day 2 and Day 14
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Success From Day 10 to Day 13
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Relief From Obstruction at Day 7 and Day 14
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Recurrence of an Episode of Bowel Obstruction at Month 3
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Recurrence of an Episode of Bowel Obstruction at Month 2
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Recurrence of an Episode of Bowel Obstruction at Month 1
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting Scores 0 to 3 on the Nausea Intensity World Heath Organization (WHO) Scale at Day 7
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting Scores 0 to 3 on the Nausea Intensity World Heath Organization (WHO) Scale at Day 14
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting Scores 0 to 3 on the Nausea Intensity World Heath Organization (WHO) Scale at Day 1
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Success From Day 5 to Day 7
NCT00363051 (11) [back to overview]Time to Overall Survival (OS)(Stratum 1)
NCT00363051 (11) [back to overview]Time to Overall Survival (OS) (Stratum 2)
NCT00363051 (11) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate: Percentage of Participants With Best Over All Response of Complete Response or Partial Response by Central Radiology Review (Stratum 2) Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT00363051 (11) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate: Percentage of Participants With Best Over All Response of Complete Response or Partial Response by Central Radiology Review (Stratum 1) Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT00363051 (11) [back to overview]Everolimus Trough Level Determination by Pharmacokinetics Parameter in Both Strata (Stratum 1 and 2)
NCT00363051 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Overall Response (Stratum 1) Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)- Central Radiology Review
NCT00363051 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [Stratum 2]
NCT00363051 (11) [back to overview]Effect of Octreotide Depot on the Trough Concentrations of Everolimus
NCT00363051 (11) [back to overview]Time to Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Central Radiology Review (Stratum 2)
NCT00363051 (11) [back to overview]Time to Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Central Radiology Review (Stratum 1)
NCT00363051 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)[Stratum 1]
NCT00372697 (7) [back to overview]Change in Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) Level From Screening to End of Study (Week 24)
NCT00372697 (7) [back to overview]Change in Tumor Volume From Screening to End of Study (Week 24)
NCT00372697 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Asymptomatic for Acromegaly Symptoms at Week 12 and End of Study (Week 24)
NCT00372697 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With > 20% Tumor Shrinkage From Screening to End of Study (Week 24)
NCT00372697 (7) [back to overview]Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL) Questionnaire Physical Scale Score at End of Study (Week 24)
NCT00372697 (7) [back to overview]Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL) Questionnaire Psychological Scale Score at End of Study (Week 24)
NCT00372697 (7) [back to overview]Change in Growth Hormone (GH) Level From Screening to End of Study (Week 24)
NCT00399893 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improved Leptin Regulation From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00399893 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improved Insulin Regulation From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00399893 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Decreased BMI Z-score From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00399893 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Decrease in Fasting Total Ghrelin
NCT00399893 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Decrease in Weight From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00399893 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Decreased Body Composition From Baseline to 6 Months by BOD POD®
NCT00399893 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improved Adiponectin Regulation From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00399893 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Decreased Body-composition From Baseline to 6 Months by DEXA
NCT00399893 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improved Peptide YY (PYY) Regulation From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00412061 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Adjudicated Central Radiology Review
NCT00412061 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs), Clinically Notable AE, Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Double-Blind Phase)
NCT00412061 (7) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Rate as Per Adjudicated Central Radiology Review Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT00412061 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival Using Kaplan-Meier Methodology
NCT00412061 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Adjudicated Central Review by Baseline 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Level
NCT00412061 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs), Clinically Notable AE, Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Open Label Phase)
NCT00412061 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Adjudicated Central Review by Baseline Chromogranin A (CgA)
NCT00426153 (4) [back to overview]Change in Subject Reported Outcomes Using Mean Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Scores
NCT00426153 (4) [back to overview]Percent Change in Renal Volume
NCT00426153 (4) [back to overview]Percent Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
NCT00426153 (4) [back to overview]Percent Change in Liver Volume
NCT00427349 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00427349 (3) [back to overview]Four-month Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT00427349 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT00510224 (3) [back to overview]Pre-post Percent Change in Circulating Levels of IGF-1 and IGF-Binding Protein 1.
NCT00510224 (3) [back to overview]Grade 4-5 Adverse Events
NCT00510224 (3) [back to overview]PSA Response
NCT00552071 (2) [back to overview]Serum IGF-1 Level
NCT00552071 (2) [back to overview]Plasma Octreotide Level After Each Treatment Phase
NCT00569127 (6) [back to overview]Central Review-based Progression-Free Survival
NCT00569127 (6) [back to overview]Local Progression-Free Survival (Investigator Assessed)
NCT00569127 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00569127 (6) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT00569127 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT00569127 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response (Confirmed and Unconfirmed Complete Response and Partial Response)
NCT00582426 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response at Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT00582426 (11) [back to overview]Number of Episodes of Diarrhea by Patient by Cycle
NCT00582426 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Need Intravenous Hydration for Control of Diarrhea
NCT00582426 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Hospitalized Due to Diarrhea
NCT00582426 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Episodes by Grade
NCT00582426 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients by Grade of Diarrhea
NCT00582426 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Need Opioids for Control of Diarrhea
NCT00582426 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Need Chemotherapy Dose Reduction Due to Diarrhea
NCT00582426 (11) [back to overview]Number of Episodes of Diarrhea by Patient
NCT00582426 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Developing Diarrhea (Grade 1 to 4)
NCT00582426 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Diarrhea (FACIT-D)
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Mean GH Level to <2.5 μg/L and the Normalization of IGF-1
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Normalization of IGF-1
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Normalization of IGF-1
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Normalization of IGF-1 After Crossover
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Ring Size
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Ring Size After Crossover
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Ring Size After Crossover
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Severity Scores of Acromegaly Symptoms
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Severity Scores of Acromegaly Symptoms After Crossover
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Summary of Mean GH Values
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Summary of Mean GH Values After Crossover
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Summary of Prolactin Levels
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Summary of Prolactin Levels After Crossover
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Octreotide Trough Concentrations by Incident Dose
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Duration of Response for Patients Achieving a Reduction of Mean GH Level to <2.5 μg/L and the Normalization of IGF-1 at Month 12 (No. of Responders: Pasireotide LAR = 51, Octreotide LAR = 32)
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Time to First Response for Patients Achieving a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5 μg/L and Normalization of IGF-1 (No. of Responders: Pasireotite LAR = 81, Octreotide LAR = 63) )
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Tumor Volume
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Tumor Volume at 12 Months
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Change From Extension Baseline in Tumor Volume After Crossover
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Health-related Quality-of-life as Measured by the AcroQoL Questionnaire
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Health-related Quality-of-life as Measured by the AcroQoL Questionnaire After Crossover
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Octreotide Trough Concentrations by Incident Dose
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Octreotide Trough Concentrations by Incident Dose
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Pasireotide Trough Concentrations by Incident Dose
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Pasireotide Trough Concentrations by Incident Dose
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5μg/L
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5μg/L
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5μg/L After Crossover
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5μg/L and Normalization of IGF-1
NCT00600886 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5μg/L and Normalization of IGF-1 After Crossover
NCT00690430 (5) [back to overview]Objective Tumor Response Rate Assessed by Investigator
NCT00690430 (5) [back to overview]Pasireotide LAR vs. Octreotide LAR on Disease Control Rate Based on RECIST Criteria
NCT00690430 (5) [back to overview]Improvement in Daily Mean Number of Diarrhea Bowel Movement Episodes by Randomization Stratum and Treatment.
NCT00690430 (5) [back to overview]Improvement in Daily Mean Number of Flushing Episodes by Randomization Stratum and Treatment.
NCT00690430 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Improvement by Randomization Stratum and Treatment.
NCT00781911 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Modified Objective Response Rate (ORR) of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Minor Response (MR) Modified Objective Response Rate (mORR)
NCT00781911 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT00781911 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Biochemical Response Rate
NCT00781911 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Six Months
NCT00853047 (13) [back to overview]Time to First Rescue, Short-acting Octreotide
NCT00853047 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Any Drug-related TEAE in the Core Phase
NCT00853047 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Bowel Movements (BMs) Per Day
NCT00853047 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any TEAE in the Open-Label Extension Phase
NCT00853047 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Complete Response at Week 4
NCT00853047 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting Improvement in the Subjective Global Assessment of Symptoms Associated With Carcinoid Syndrome
NCT00853047 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (u5-HIAA)
NCT00853047 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Severity of Abdominal Pain or Discomfort
NCT00853047 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percentage of Days Per Week Experiencing a Sensation of Urgency to Defecate
NCT00853047 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Cutaneous Flushing Episodes
NCT00853047 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Frequency of Rescue for Short-acting Octreotide Use/Day
NCT00853047 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Stool Form
NCT00853047 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Chromogranin A
NCT00966355 (2) [back to overview]5-day Treatment Failure (Failure to Control Bleeding, Rebleeding, or Death)
NCT00966355 (2) [back to overview]Active Bleeding During the First Endoscopic Exam, Needing Blood Transfusion for 5 Days, Experiencing Adverse Effects
NCT01121939 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01121939 (5) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01121939 (5) [back to overview]Define Toxicity and Safety
NCT01121939 (5) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate
NCT01121939 (5) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Duration of the First Response for Patients Achieving a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5 μg/L and Normalization of IGF-1 and Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly (Extension Full Analysis Set)
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Mean GH Levels to < 2.5 µg/L and Normalization of Sex- and Age-adjusted IGF-1.
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Mean GH <1.0 μg/L Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly (Extension Full Analysis Set)
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Time to First Response (Weeks) by Treatment for Patients Achieving a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5 µg/L and Normalization of IGF-1 and Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AcroQoL Total Scores for Patients Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly for CORE Visits(Extension Full Analysis Set)
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AcroQoL Total Scores for Patients Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly for Extension Visits (Extension Full Analysis Set)
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean GH Values for Patients Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly for CORE Visits (Extension Full Analysis Set)
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean GH Values for Patients Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly for Extension Visits (Extension Full Analysis Set)
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Standardized IGF-1 Values for Patients Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly for CORE Visits (Extension Full Analysis Set)
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Standardized IGF-1 Values for Patients Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly for Extension Visits (Extension Full Analysis Set)
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Normalization of Sex- and Age-adjusted IGF-1treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly (Extension Full Analysis Set).
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Mean GH < 1.0 μg/L and Normalization of IGF-1, Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly (Extension Full Analysis Set)
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Mean GH < 2.5 μg/L and Normalization of IGF-1, Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly (Extension Full Analysis Set)
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Mean GH < 2.5 μg/L Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly (Extension Full Analysis Set)
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Summary of Pasireotide Trough Concentrations in Acromegaly Patients Following Monthly i.m. Injections of Pasireotide LAR by Incident Dose From Start of Extension Phase up to Week 196 of the Extension Phase (PK Set)
NCT01137682 (16) [back to overview]Summary of Pasireotide Trough Concentrations in Acromegaly Patients Following Monthly i.m. Injections of Pasireotide LAR by Incident Dose From Start of Extension Phase up to Week 196 of the Extension Phase (PK Set)
NCT01229943 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01229943 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01229943 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01278342 (3) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) At 3 Months
NCT01278342 (3) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants With Partial Response (PR) at 8 Months
NCT01278342 (3) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at 8 Months
NCT01371643 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders (Primary Medical Treatment in Arm 1, Primary Surgical Treatment in Arm 2)
NCT01371643 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders (Only Including Surgical Failures in Arm 2)
NCT01371643 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders (All Treatments)
NCT01412424 (8) [back to overview]Maintenance of Response During the Extension Treatment Period
NCT01412424 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders at the End of the Core Treatment Period
NCT01412424 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Specified IGF-1 and GH Concentrations at the Beginning and at the End of the Extension Treatment Period
NCT01412424 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders at the End of the Extension Treatment Period
NCT01412424 (8) [back to overview]Maintenance of Response During the Fixed Dose Phase of the Core Treatment Period
NCT01412424 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥ 1, 2, or 3 Acromegaly Symptoms at Baseline and at the End of the Extension Treatment Period
NCT01412424 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improved or Maintained Acromegaly Symptoms at the End of the Extension Treatment Period
NCT01412424 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Specified IGF-1 and GH Concentrations at Baseline and at the End of the Core Treatment Period
NCT01538966 (1) [back to overview]Cost Effectiveness
NCT01578239 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Questionnaire
NCT01578239 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Questionnaire
NCT01578239 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Neuroendocrine Carcinoid Module (EORTC QLQ-GINET21)
NCT01578239 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Neuroendocrine Carcinoid Module (EORTC QLQ-GINET21)
NCT01578239 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01578239 (11) [back to overview]Rate of Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01578239 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT01578239 (11) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01578239 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01578239 (11) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01578239 (11) [back to overview]Time to Tumour Progression (TTP)
NCT01707225 (2) [back to overview]Need for Blood Transfusion and Hospital Admission for GI Bleed
NCT01707225 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Side-Effects
NCT01789281 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Clinical Benefit
NCT01789281 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01869725 (3) [back to overview]Compare Specificity of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT With Octreoscan
NCT01869725 (3) [back to overview]Compare Sensitivity of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT With Octreoscan
NCT01869725 (3) [back to overview]Comparison of Conventional Imaging and Gallium Ga 68-edotreotide PET Using Concordance in Tumor Detection With Pathology
NCT01886287 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Improved Frequency of Diarrhea
NCT01917773 (1) [back to overview]Compared Colonic Motility Index From Fasting to Post Octreotide Infusion
NCT02217800 (1) [back to overview]The Number of Patients Who Achieve a Trough Human Growth Hormone (hGH) Concentration of <2.5µg/L During the Last 12 Hours of the 23 Hour Profile Following Each Study Treatment.
NCT02235987 (1) [back to overview]Participants With Trough Human Growth Hormone < 2.5 ug/mL
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Requiring Treatment Withdrawal in Lapatinib and Capecitabine
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Taking Anti-diarrhoeal Medication
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Response (up to 24 Weeks)
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Duration of Diarrhoea of Any Grade of Severity
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Contacting Other Non-hospital Healthcare Professionals to Discuss Diarrhoea as Recorded in the DMD
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Diarrhoea of Any Grade of Severity (up to 24 Weeks)
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Diarrhoea of Grade 3 and Above (up to 24 Weeks)
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Making Dietary Changes Due to Diarrhoea as Recorded in the DMD
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Reporting Changes in Bowel Movements From Baseline (Frequency and/or Consistency) as Recorded in the Diarrhoea Management Diary (DMD)
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Reporting Stopping Completely or Missing Doses of Anti-cancer Tablets Due to Diarrhoea as Recorded in the DMD
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Taking Anti-diarrhoeal Medication as Recorded in the DMD
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Time to Onset of the First Episode of Diarrhoea of Any Grade of Severity
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Time to the First Subject Reported Change in Frequency and/or Consistency of Bowel Movements From Baseline as Recorded in the DMD
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Number of Lapatinib and Capecitabine Tablets Dispensed and Returned
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Diarrhoea of Grade 2 and Above (up to 24 Weeks)
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Requiring Dose Delay in Lapatinib and Capecitabine
NCT02294786 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects Requiring Dose Reduction in Lapatinib and Capecitabine
NCT02299089 (10) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of Octreotide After Each Injection of CAM2029 as Compared With Baseline PK for Sandostatin® Long-acting Release (LAR®) Ctrough
NCT02299089 (10) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of Octreotide After Each Injection of CAM2029 as Compared With Baseline PK for Sandostatin® Long-acting Release (LAR®) Cmax
NCT02299089 (10) [back to overview]CAM2029 Effect on Growth Hormone (GH) (Acromegaly)
NCT02299089 (10) [back to overview]CAM2029 Effect on Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF-1) (Acromegaly)
NCT02299089 (10) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of Octreotide After Each Injection of CAM2029 as Compared With Baseline PK for Sandostatin® Long-acting Release (LAR®) AUC.
NCT02299089 (10) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of Octreotide After Each Injection of CAM2029 as Compared With Baseline PK for Sandostatin® Long-acting Release (LAR®) Ctrough
NCT02299089 (10) [back to overview]To Assess the Symptoms of Carcinoid Syndrome (Number of Bowel Movements and Flushing) and the Use of Rescue Medication Versus Baseline (by Using Patient Diaries) (NET)
NCT02299089 (10) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of Octreotide After Each Injection of CAM2029 as Compared With Baseline PK for Sandostatin® Long-acting Release (LAR®) AUC
NCT02299089 (10) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
NCT02299089 (10) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of Octreotide After Each Injection of CAM2029 as Compared With Baseline PK for Sandostatin® Long-acting Release (LAR®) Cmax.
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Improved Acromegaly Index of Severity (AIS) Score at the End of the Run-in Phase
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With a Reduction in the Overall Number of Active Acromegaly Symptoms at the End of the Run-in Phase
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who Maintain or Reduce the Overall Number of Active Acromegaly Symptoms at the End of the RCT Phase
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who Maintain or Improve Their Overall Acromegaly Index of Severity (AIS) Score at the End of the RCT Phase
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who Are Biochemically Controlled Throughout the RCT Phase
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Reporting Interference With Daily Activities in Acro-TSQ During the RCT Phase
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Change in Acromegaly Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ACRO-TSQ) Scores From Baseline to End of Run-in in Randomized Patients.
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to End of Run-in Phase in WPAI
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Reporting Injection Site Reactions in the Acro-TSQ During the RCT Phase
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients on Octreotide Capsules Who Are Biochemically Controlled at the End of the RCT Phase- Landmark Analysis
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients of Those Completing the RCT Phase Who Entered the Study Extension Phase
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Biochemically Controlled at the End of Run-in
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]EuroQol - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Scores During the Run-in Phase
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Clinical and Biochemical Control at the End of the RCT Phase
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to End of RCT Phase in WPAI
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Proportion of Week 26 Responders on Octreotide Capsules Who Are Biochemically Controlled at the End of the RCT Phase- Landmark Sensitivity Analysis
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Change in IGF-1 Levels in the RCT Phase
NCT02685709 (18) [back to overview]Change in GH Levels in the RCT Phase
NCT02916433 (2) [back to overview]Bronchial Secretion Volume Over Preceding 24 Hour Period
NCT02916433 (2) [back to overview]Extubation Within 72 Hours
NCT03252353 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Begin Rescue Treatment
NCT03252353 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Maintain Their Biochemical Response at the End of the Double Blind Placebo Controlled (DPC) Period.
NCT03252353 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Maintain Growth Hormone (GH) Response at the End of the Double Blind Placebo Controlled Period
NCT03273712 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Grade 4 or Higher Renal Adverse Event.
NCT03273712 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Grade 4 or Higher Irreversible Adverse Events
NCT03520569 (3) [back to overview]Change in Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) Between Baseline and After 2 Hour Insulin Clamp
NCT03520569 (3) [back to overview]Change in Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) Between Baseline and After 2 Hour Insulin Clamp
NCT03520569 (3) [back to overview]Change in Augmentation Index Between Baseline and After 2 Hour Insulin Clamp
NCT04027348 (1) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Obstruction Clearance

Number of Participants With a Reduction in Total Tumor Volume of at Least 20%.

Octreotide treatment will be considered successful if the patient receiving treatment for six months shows a reduction in total tumor mass/ fluid collection or reaccumulation of at least 20%. (NCT00005906)
Timeframe: Six months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Octreotide0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Reduction of Pain/Symptoms as Measured by a Simple Numeric Symptom Distress Scale (NDS) to Rate the Severity of Individual Symptoms.

"Octreotide treatment will be considered successful if the reported pain/symptom score is reduced by at least 2 levels at termination of treatment.~A simple visual numeric distress scale ranging from zero to 10 will be employed to rate the severity of individual symptoms. The best score is zero, which means absence of symptoms and the maximal is 10, meaning that the symptoms are very severe." (NCT00005906)
Timeframe: Six months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Octreotide1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Liver Function Abnormalities

"One or more abnormality of the following liver function tests:~Alkaline phosphatase above 116 i.u.~SGPT above 41 i.u.~SGOT from 34 i.u.~Total bilirubin above 1.0 mg/dl" (NCT00005906)
Timeframe: Six months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Octreotide1

[back to top]

Time to Recurrence of Ascites.

Comparison between Albumin (Control group) and Vasoconstrictor (Treatment group) (NCT00108355)
Timeframe: Variable depending on the patient, average 10 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Albumin (Control Group)10
Vasoconstrictor (Treatment Group)8

[back to top]

Development of Post-paracentesis Circulatory Dysfunction (PCD)

Defined as an increase in Plasma Renin Activity (PRA) by >50% from baseline to a level > 4 ng/mL/h at post-paracentesis day (NCT00108355)
Timeframe: 6 days after paracentesis

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Albumin (Control Group)2
Vasoconstrictor (Treatment Group)2

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is measured from date of trial entry until documented progression of disease or death from any cause. PFS is measured by computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed at baseline and after every three cycles. (NCT00113360)
Timeframe: PFS assessed every 12 weeks (at the end of every 3 cycles) or more frequently if clinically indicated

InterventionWeeks (Median)
RAD001 Plus Octreotide Depot60

[back to top]

Time to Tumor Progression Documented by Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Median time to tumor progression at the time of the planned interim analysis that includes all data observed until June 2008. (NCT00171873)
Timeframe: Up to 7 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Octreotide LAR (SMS995)14.3
Placebo6.0

[back to top]

Median Time to Paracentesis

Kaplan Meier curves will be constructed for each group; patients lost to follow up will be censored. A log rank test will be used to compare groups. We will adjust for the volume of fluid withdrawn at paracentesis and for change in abdominal circumference between baseline and the next procedure because a patient may require an extra paracentesis if only a small volume is withdrawn at baseline. (NCT00182754)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Arm I28
Arm II14

[back to top]

Number of Paracenteses

We will compare the number of paracenteses between groups. Parametric or nonparametric testing will be used as appropriate. (NCT00182754)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionnumber of paracenteses per patient (Median)
Arm I0.5
Arm II1

[back to top]

Average Quality-of-life

Quality of life will be recorded and analyzed in a descriptive, exploratory fashion. We acknowledge that this study will represent the first to attempt a prospective assessment of quality of life in patients with symptomatic ascites. The underlying hypothesis of this quality of life assessment is that patients who are receiving octreotide will enjoy a better quality of life compared to patients who receive placebo. Quality of life scores from the CLDQ will be summed for all patients on a monthly basis. Again we anticipate high patient drop out rates over time within these two cohorts. With due diligence, we will attempt to ascertain the reason for each patient drop out, and appropriate imputation techniques will be employed for each.Quantified as: 1='All of the time' 2='Most of the time' 3='A good bit of the time' 4='Some of the time' 5='A little bit of the time' 6='Hardly any of the time' 7='None of the time' 0='Missing'; (NCT00182754)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

,
InterventionQOL score (Median)
abdominal bloatingshortness of breathabdominal discomfort
Arm I444.5
Arm II332

[back to top]

Participant's Quality of Life Using the Edmonton Scale

The Edmonton Scale consisted of 9 items: pain, activity, nausea, depression, anxiety, fatigue, appetite, sensation of well-being and dyspnea (difficult or labored breathing). Participants rated these items on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being the worse. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 7, Day 14, Month 1, Month 2 and Month 3

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Day 1 (n=30,29)Day 7 (n=24,26)Day 14 (n=20,14)Month 1 (n=11,13)Month 2 (n=7,4)Month 3 (n=2,2)
Octreotide4.124.234.304.183.460.05
Placebo4.123.373.854.493.231.60

[back to top]

Number of Vomiting Episodes Per Day at Day1, Day 2 and Day 14

The mean number of vomiting episodes per a 24 hour period is presented for Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14

,
InterventionVomiting episodes (Mean)
Day 1Day 7 (n=31,31)Day 14 (n=28,27)
Octreotide1.20.30.3
Placebo0.60.40.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Success From Day 10 to Day 13

"Treatment Success was defined as: less than 2 episodes of vomiting on average per day for the 4 days prior to Day 14 [from Day 10 to Day 13] and no use of an Nasogastric Tube (NGT) since at least Day 10 and no use of an anticholinergic agent until Day 14.~Treatment Failure is defined as: 2 or more episodes of vomiting per day on average for the 4 days prior to Day 14 or use of an NGT after Day 9 or use of an anticholinergic agent before Day 14 or withdrawal from the trial between Day 1 and Day 14 (included), whatever the cause." (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 10 to Day 13

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
TREATMENT SUCCESSVomiting episodes <2 (per day)Vomiting episodes ≥2 (per day)No Nasogastric Tube since Day 10Nasogastric Tube used since Day 10No Anticholinergic agentsAnticholinergic agents takenPremature discontinuation/missing data, failure
Octreotide1219214718311
Placebo913213211417

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Relief From Obstruction at Day 7 and Day 14

Relief from obstruction is defined by combining restart of stools for at least the previous 3 days, less than 2 episodes of vomiting on average for the previous 4 days and the restarting of flatus (gas generated in the stomach or bowels) for at least the previous 12 hours. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 7 and Day 14

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Relief from Obstruction: Day 7No Relief from Obstruction: Day 7Relief from Obstruction: Day 14No Relief from Obstruction: Day 14
Octreotide9201110
Placebo1512105

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Recurrence of an Episode of Bowel Obstruction at Month 3

Recurrence of bowel obstruction was confirmed by abdominal X-ray. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Month 3

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Recurrence at Month 3No Recurrence at Month 3
Octreotide03
Placebo02

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Recurrence of an Episode of Bowel Obstruction at Month 2

Recurrence of bowel obstruction was confirmed by abdominal X-ray. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Month 2

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Recurrence at Month 2No Recurrence at Month 2
Octreotide26
Placebo25

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Recurrence of an Episode of Bowel Obstruction at Month 1

Recurrence of bowel obstruction was confirmed by abdominal X-ray. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: 1 Month

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Recurrence at Month 1No Recurrence at Month 1
Octreotide113
Placebo213

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting Scores 0 to 3 on the Nausea Intensity World Heath Organization (WHO) Scale at Day 7

Participants rated their nausea intensity on a scale of 0 to 3, with 3 being the worse. The number of participants with a score of 0, a score of 1, a score of 2 and a score of 3 are presented for Day 7. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 7

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Score=0Score=1Score=2Score=3
Octreotide21253
Placebo15961

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting Scores 0 to 3 on the Nausea Intensity World Heath Organization (WHO) Scale at Day 14

Participants rated their nausea intensity on a scale of 0 to 3, with 3 being the worse. The number of participants with a score of 0, a score of 1, a score of 2 and a score of 3 are presented for Day 14. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 14

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Score=0Score=1Score=2Score=3
Octreotide22222
Placebo22311

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting Scores 0 to 3 on the Nausea Intensity World Heath Organization (WHO) Scale at Day 1

Participants rated their nausea intensity on a scale of 0 to 3, with 3 being the worse. The number of participants with a score of 0, a score of 1, a score of 2 and a score of 3 are presented for Day 1. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 1

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Score=0Score=1Score=2Score=3
Octreotide16178
Placebo13298

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Success From Day 5 to Day 7

Day 7 treatment success was defined as improvement of symptoms in the previous 2 days (average number of vomiting episodes less than 2 from Day 5, no Nasogastric Tube (NGT) since Day 5 and no anticholinergic agent or withdrawal from trial). (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 5 to Day 7

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
TREATMENT SUCCESSVomiting episodes <2 (per day) since Day 5Vomiting episodes ≥2 (per day) since Day 5No Nasogastric Tube since Day 5Nasogastric Tube used since Day 5No Anticholinergic agentsAnticholinergic agents takenPremature discontinuation/missing data
Octreotide222812272633
Placebo202522432525

[back to top]

Time to Overall Survival (OS)(Stratum 1)

"Overall survival measures the time of survival , with any response or disease progression, until death. The OS is defined as the time from date of start of treatment to date of death due to any cause.~If a patient is not known to have died, survival was censored at the date of last contact. In each treatment stratum, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the overall survival function was constructed." (NCT00363051)
Timeframe: from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause, reported between day of first patient randomised, 26 June 2006, until cut-off date 13 April 2012

Interventionmonths (Median)
Stratum 1: Everolimus 10 mg28.78

[back to top]

Time to Overall Survival (OS) (Stratum 2)

"Overall survival measures the time of survival , with any response or disease progression, until death. The OS is defined as the time from date of start of treatment to date of death due to any cause.~If a patient is not known to have died, survival was censored at the date of last contact. In each treatment stratum, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the overall survival function was constructed." (NCT00363051)
Timeframe: from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause, reported between day of first patient randomised, 26 June 2006, until cut-off date 13 April 2012

Interventionmonths (Median)
Stratum 2: Everolimus 10 mg + Octreotide Depot38.77

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate: Percentage of Participants With Best Over All Response of Complete Response or Partial Response by Central Radiology Review (Stratum 2) Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

Objective response rate was defined by RECIST criteria: Partial response (PR) must have ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter of all target lesions, from the baseline sum. Complete response (CR) must have disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. For CR or PR, tumor measurements must be confirmed by 2nd assessments within 4 weeks. Progression = 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of all target lesions, from smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline; or a new lesion; or progression of non-target lesions. (NCT00363051)
Timeframe: from date of randomization/start of treatment until first documented response confirmed 4 weeks later (at least 3 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stratum 2: Everolimus 10 mg + Octreotide Depot4.4

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate: Percentage of Participants With Best Over All Response of Complete Response or Partial Response by Central Radiology Review (Stratum 1) Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

Objective response rate was defined by RECIST criteria: Partial response (PR) must have ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter of all target lesions, from the baseline sum. Complete response (CR) must have disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. For CR or PR, tumor measurements must be confirmed by 2nd assessments within 4 weeks. Progression = 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of all target lesions, from smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline; or a new lesion; or progression of non-target lesions. (NCT00363051)
Timeframe: from date of randomization/start of treatment until first documented response confirmed 4 weeks later( at least 3 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stratum 1: Everolimus 10 mg9.6

[back to top]

Everolimus Trough Level Determination by Pharmacokinetics Parameter in Both Strata (Stratum 1 and 2)

For all patients in both strata, a blood sample for everolimus trough level determination will be collected immediately prior to the everolimus administration on Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, and every month thereafter. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 days of consecutive daily treatment with everolimus and treatment continued until tumor progression. It is critical that patients not take their daily everolimus dose before the sample is drawn. (NCT00363051)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Stratum 1: Everolimus 10 mg15.7
Stratum 2: Everolimus 10 mg + Octreotide Depot17.3

[back to top]

Duration of Overall Response (Stratum 1) Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)- Central Radiology Review

"Duration of overall response applies only to patients whose best overall response was complete response (CR) or partial response (PR):~Complete Response (CR) = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression.~Partial response (PR) = at least two determinations of PR or better at least 4 weeks apart before progression.~Progression = 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, from the smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline; or a new lesion; or progression of non-target lesions" (NCT00363051)
Timeframe: from date of first documented confirmed response to time to progression, at least 3 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Stratum 1: Everolimus 10 mg10.64

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [Stratum 2]

Adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgment of investigators represent significant hazards. (NCT00363051)
Timeframe: on or after the day of the first intake of study treatment to starting no later than 28 days after study treatment discontinuation, at least every month

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Adverse EventsDeathSerious Adverse Events
Stratum 2: Everolimus 10 mg + Octreotide Depot45227

[back to top]

Effect of Octreotide Depot on the Trough Concentrations of Everolimus

The effect of Octreotide Depot on the trough concentrations of everolimus was assessed at Cycle 1 Day 15. (NCT00363051)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (pre-treatment baseline) (n=37)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n= 38)
Stratum 2: Everolimus 10 mg + Octreotide Depot3.23.7

[back to top]

Time to Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Central Radiology Review (Stratum 2)

"Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death from any cause. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the PFS survival function was constructed.~Median PFS was obtained and displayed along with 95% confidence intervals." (NCT00363051)
Timeframe: from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 26 June 2006, until cut-off date 13 September 2010

InterventionMonths (Median)
Stratum 2: Everolimus 10 mg + Octreotide Depot16.69

[back to top]

Time to Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Central Radiology Review (Stratum 1)

"Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death from any cause. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the PFS survival function was constructed.~Median PFS was obtained and displayed along with 95% confidence intervals." (NCT00363051)
Timeframe: from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 26 June 2006, until cut-off date 13 September 2010

InterventionMonths (Median)
Stratum 1: Everolimus 10 mg9.69

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)[Stratum 1]

Adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgment of investigators represent significant hazards. (NCT00363051)
Timeframe: on or after the day of the first intake of study treatment to starting no later than 28 days after study treatment discontinuation, at least every month

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Adverse EventsDeathSerious Adverse Events
Stratum 1: Everolimus 10 mg1151063

[back to top]

Change in Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) Level From Screening to End of Study (Week 24)

Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) level was measured in a blood sample with an automated immunometric assay in a central laboratory. (NCT00372697)
Timeframe: Screening to end of study (Week 24)

Interventionµg/L (Mean)
Octreotide 30 mg Every 21 Days-40.4
Octreotide 60 mg Every 28 Days-135.0

[back to top]

Change in Tumor Volume From Screening to End of Study (Week 24)

A pre-treatment magnetic resonance image (MRI) assessment of the pituitary area was required within 12 weeks prior to Screening as a baseline evaluation. A second MRI was performed at the end of the study (Week 24). All MRIs were performed according to protocol-defined guidelines. The tumor volume (mm^3) was calculated from measurements obtained in 3 axes from the MRI images. (NCT00372697)
Timeframe: Screening to end of study (Week 24)

Interventionmm^3 (Mean)
Octreotide 30 mg Every 21 Days15.9
Octreotide 60 mg Every 28 Days-0.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Asymptomatic for Acromegaly Symptoms at Week 12 and End of Study (Week 24)

The investigator asked the participant to score the following symptoms of acromegaly: Headache, perspiration, paresthesia, fatigue, osteoarthralgia, and carpal tunnel syndrome on a 5-point scale (0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe, but not disabling; 4=severe and disabling). The percentage of asymptomatic participants, ie, with a score of 0 for all symptoms, was calculated. (NCT00372697)
Timeframe: Week 12 and end of study (Week 24)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24
Octreotide 30 mg Every 21 Days33.320.0
Octreotide 60 mg Every 28 Days9.099.09

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With > 20% Tumor Shrinkage From Screening to End of Study (Week 24)

A pre-treatment magnetic resonance image (MRI) assessment of the pituitary area was required within 12 weeks prior to Screening as a baseline evaluation. A second MRI was performed at the end of the study (Week 24). All MRIs were performed according to protocol-defined guidelines. The tumor volume (mm^3) was calculated from measurements obtained in 3 axes from the MRI images. (NCT00372697)
Timeframe: Screening to end of study (Week 24)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Octreotide 30 mg Every 21 Days14.3
Octreotide 60 mg Every 28 Days11.1

[back to top]

Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL) Questionnaire Physical Scale Score at End of Study (Week 24)

The AcroQoL contains 8 items on Physical aspects. Participants were asked to rate each item on a 1-5 Likert scale measuring either the frequency of occurrence (always, most of the time, sometimes, rarely, or never) or the degree of agreement (completely agree, moderately agree, neither agree nor disagree, moderately disagree, completely disagree). The score on the physical scale can range from 8-40. A higher score indicates better Quality of Life. (NCT00372697)
Timeframe: End of study (Week 24)

InterventionPercent of maximum score (Mean)
Octreotide 30 mg Every 21 Days67.9
Octreotide 60 mg Every 28 Days58.0

[back to top]

Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL) Questionnaire Psychological Scale Score at End of Study (Week 24)

The AcroQoL contains 14 items on Psychological aspects. Participants were asked to rate each item on a 1-5 Likert scale measuring either the frequency of occurrence (always, most of the time, sometimes, rarely, or never) or the degree of agreement (completely agree, moderately agree, neither agree nor disagree, moderately disagree, completely disagree). The score on the psychological scale ranges from 14-70. A higher score indicates better Quality of Life. (NCT00372697)
Timeframe: End of study (Week 24)

InterventionPercent of maximum score (Mean)
Octreotide 30 mg Every 21 Days65.1
Octreotide 60 mg Every 28 Days72.1

[back to top]

Change in Growth Hormone (GH) Level From Screening to End of Study (Week 24)

Growth hormone (GH) level was the average value measured in 3 blood samples collected at 15 minute intervals at each visit. GH was measured with an automated immunometric assay in a central laboratory. (NCT00372697)
Timeframe: Screening to end of study (Week 24)

Interventionµg/L (Mean)
Octreotide 30 mg Every 21 Days-1.7
Octreotide 60 mg Every 28 Days-2.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improved Leptin Regulation From Baseline to 6 Months

Number of participants with improved Leptin regulation from baseline to 6 months of Octreotide or Placebo therapy (NCT00399893)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Octreotide1
Placebo Comparator2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improved Insulin Regulation From Baseline to 6 Months

Number of participants with improved Insulin regulation from baseline to 6 months of Octreotide or Placebo therapy. Insulin regulation was measured by immunochemiluminescent assay. (NCT00399893)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Octreotide2
Placebo Comparator0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Decreased BMI Z-score From Baseline to 6 Months

Number of participants with decreased BMI z-score from baseline to 6 months of Octreotide or Placebo therapy (NCT00399893)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Octreotide0
Placebo Comparator2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Decrease in Fasting Total Ghrelin

Number of participants showing a decrease in Fasting total ghrelin from baseline to 6 months of treatment with Octreotide or placebo (NCT00399893)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Octreotide1
Placebo Comparator1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Decrease in Weight From Baseline to 6 Months

Number of participants who had a decrease in weight from baseline to 6 months of Octreotide or placebo therapy (NCT00399893)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Octreotide0
Placebo Comparator2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Decreased Body Composition From Baseline to 6 Months by BOD POD®

Number of participants with decreased body-composition as Measured by BOD POD® body composition tracking system from baseline to 6 months of Octreotide or Placebo therapy (NCT00399893)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Octreotide2
Placebo Comparator3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improved Adiponectin Regulation From Baseline to 6 Months

Number of participants with improved Adiponectin regulation from baseline to 6 months of Octreotide or Placebo therapy (NCT00399893)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Octreotide2
Placebo Comparator2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Decreased Body-composition From Baseline to 6 Months by DEXA

Number of participants with decreased body-composition as Measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan from baseline to 6 months of Octreotide or Placebo therapy (NCT00399893)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Octreotide0
Placebo Comparator0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improved Peptide YY (PYY) Regulation From Baseline to 6 Months

Number of participants with improved Peptide YY (PYY) regulation from baseline to 6 months of Octreotide or Placebo therapy (NCT00399893)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Octreotide1
Placebo Comparator1

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Adjudicated Central Radiology Review

Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death from any cause. The primary analysis of PFS was based on the independent central adjudicated assessment using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00412061)
Timeframe: Time from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 January 2007, until cut-off date 02 April 2010

InterventionMonths (Median)
Octreotide+ Everolimus16.43
Octreotide+ Placebo11.33

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs), Clinically Notable AE, Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Double-Blind Phase)

AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. SAEs are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgment of investigators represent significant hazards. (NCT00412061)
Timeframe: From first day of treatment up to 28 days after last day of treatment in double blind

,
InterventionPatients (Number)
Clinically notable AEGrade 3-4 Adverse EventsOn treatment deathSerious adverse events
Octreotide+ Everolimus20816219126
Octreotide+ Placebo1461091174

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Rate as Per Adjudicated Central Radiology Review Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

The best overall response rate is defined as the percentage of patients having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response. Complete Response (CR) = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression. • Partial response (PR) = at least two determinations of PR or better at least 4 weeks apart before progression. (NCT00412061)
Timeframe: Time from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 January 2007, until cut-off date 02 April 2010

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Octreotide+ Everolimus2.3
Octreotide+ Placebo1.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival Using Kaplan-Meier Methodology

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. If a patient was not known to have died, survival was censored at the date of last contact. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate the median overall survival for each treatment group. (NCT00412061)
Timeframe: Months 12, 24, 36, 48

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
12 Months24 Months36 Months48 Months
Octreotide+ Everolimus80.557.042.938.0
Octreotide+ Placebo Followed by Open Label Arm81.863.648.541.6

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Adjudicated Central Review by Baseline 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Level

5-HIAA levels in urine are frequently elevated in patients with advanced carcinoid tumors. Baseline levels of 5-HIAA in urine were defined as 'High' if they exceeded the median value, and 'Low' if they were lower than or equal to the median. (NCT00412061)
Timeframe: If elevated at baseline, evaluated every cycle visit (28 days/cycle) reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 January 2007, until cut-off date 02 April 2010

,
InterventionMonths (Median)
5-HIAA <=median (n=93,96)5-HIAA > median (n=94,95)
Octreotide+ Everolimus21.7513.83
Octreotide+ Placebo13.908.41

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs), Clinically Notable AE, Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Open Label Phase)

AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. SAEs are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgment of investigators represent significant hazards. (NCT00412061)
Timeframe: From first day of treatment up to 28 days after last day of treatment in double blind

InterventionPatients (Number)
Clinically notable AEGrade 3-4 Adverse EventsOn treatment deathSerious adverse events
Everolimus Open Label Arm1541152293

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Adjudicated Central Review by Baseline Chromogranin A (CgA)

"Serum CgA levels in urine are frequently elevated in patients with advanced carcinoid tumors. Baseline levels of serum CgA were characterized relative to the upper limited of normal (ULN). CgA levels exceeding 2 x ULN were considered to be 'Elevated'; otherwise considered as Non-elevated." (NCT00412061)
Timeframe: If elevated at baseline, evaluated every cycle visit (28 days/cycle) reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 January 2007, until cut-off date 02 April 2010

,
InterventionMonths (Median)
CgA<=2x ULN (n=60,78)CgA>2x ULN (n=152,130)
Octreotide+ Everolimus31.3113.93
Octreotide+ Placebo20.078.41

[back to top] [back to top]

Percent Change in Renal Volume

Percent change from baseline in renal volume, measured in milliliters by MRI or CT scans (NCT00426153)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Octreotide0.25
Placebo8.61

[back to top]

Percent Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

Percent change from baseline in renal function/GFR, measured by clearance of iothalamate with monitoring of bladder emptying using ultrasound (NCT00426153)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Octreotide-5.1
Placebo-7.2

[back to top]

Percent Change in Liver Volume

Percent change from baseline in liver volume, measured in milliliters by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)or Computed Tomography (CT) scans (NCT00426153)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Octreotide-5.0
Placebo0.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from registration until death (event), or censored at last date known alive. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method , with 95% confidence intervals calculated using Greenwood's formula (NCT00427349)
Timeframe: assessed every 3 months if patient is < 2 years from study entry, then every 6 months up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
AMG 706+Octreotide27.5

[back to top]

Four-month Progression-free Survival Rate

Four-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate is defined as number of patients who are still progression free at 4 months after study entry divided by number of eligible and treated patients enrolled to the study. Progression is evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0, and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the baseline measurements, or the appearance of one or more new lesion(s), or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT00427349)
Timeframe: assessed every 4 weeks while on treatment and at three months post-treatment for participants treated for one cycle, up to month four

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AMG 706+Octreotide78.5

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Tumor response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0. Objective response rate is defined as number of patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by the total number of analyzable patients. CR is defined as complete disappearance of all tumor lesions, and partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. (NCT00427349)
Timeframe: assessed every 8 weeks while on treatment, and frequency of tumor measurements during follow-up were determined by the treating physician, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AMG 706+Octreotide13.6

[back to top]

Pre-post Percent Change in Circulating Levels of IGF-1 and IGF-Binding Protein 1.

Serum was batched and IGF and IGFBP levels were assayed at one time at the end of the study using an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) method by Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (Webster, TX). (NCT00510224)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Median)
IGF-1IGFBP-1
Octreotide Acetate-34.576.3

[back to top]

Grade 4-5 Adverse Events

(NCT00510224)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionAdverse Events (Number)
Octreotide Acetate0

[back to top]

PSA Response

Number of participants with a PSA decline of at least 50% from Baseline during the first 3 cycles of therapy, confirmed by a second measurement at least 2 weeks later. (NCT00510224)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Octreotide Acetate0

[back to top]

Serum IGF-1 Level

Venous sampling was performed at each visit immediately prior to each IM injection. Levels were measured at each visit and mean for the group was calculated after each treatment phase. (NCT00552071)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercentage of upper limit of normal (Mean)
Ultrasound-guided Injections of Octreotide LAR132
Regular Injections of Octreotide LAR124

[back to top]

Plasma Octreotide Level After Each Treatment Phase

Venous sampling was performed at each visit immediately prior to each IM injection. Levels were measured at each visit and mean for the group was calculated after each treatment phase. (NCT00552071)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Ultrasound-guided Injections of Octreotide LAR885
Regular Injections of Octreotide LAR1167

[back to top]

Central Review-based Progression-Free Survival

From date of randomization (which is the date of registration) to date of first documentation of progression based on Central Radiological Review of the appropriate CT or MRI scans, or symptomatic deterioration (as defined in Section 10.2e)), or development of new lesions or disease not identified on CT or MRI, or death due to any cause. Patients who have a local assessment of progression based on imaging, but for whom central review does not concur, will be censored at the last Central Radiological Review date, unless subsequent scans or documentation of symptomatic deterioration provides evidence of progression. Patients last known not to have progressed are censored at the date of last contact. Patients with incomplete Central Radiological Review are censored at the date of last Central Radiological Review if patient has not progressed prior to that time. (NCT00569127)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Octreotide, Bevacizumab16.6
Octreotide, Interferon Alpha-2b15.4

[back to top]

Local Progression-Free Survival (Investigator Assessed)

From date of randomization (which is the date of registration) to date of first documentation of progression [per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) as defined in Section 10.2d] or symptomatic deterioration (as defined in Section 10.2e), or death due to any cause. Patients last known not to have progressed are censored at date of last contact. Progression (Section 10.2d) includes one or more of the following: 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target measurable lesions over smallest sum observed using the same techniques as baseline; unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease in the opinion of the treating physician; appearance of new lesion/site; or death due to disease without prior documentation of progression and without symptomatic deterioration. Symptomatic deterioration (Section 10.2e) is global deterioration of health status requiring discontinuation of treatment without objective evidence of progression. (NCT00569127)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Octreotide, Bevacizumab15.4
Octreotide, Interferon Alpha-2b10.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival

From date of registration to date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive are censored at date of last contact. (NCT00569127)
Timeframe: Up to 7 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Octreotide, Bevacizumab35.2
Octreotide, Interferon Alpha-2b47.3

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

From date of randomization (which is the date of registration) to date of first observation of progressive disease (as defined in Section 10.2d), death due to any cause, symptomatic deterioration (as defined in Section 10.2e), or discontinuation of treatment. This has been calculated using Central-Review based progression events. Patients last known not to have failed treatment are censored at date last known not to have failed. Patients with incomplete Central Radiological Review are censored at the date of last Central Radiological Review if patient has not failed treatment prior to that time. (NCT00569127)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Octreotide, Bevacizumab9.9
Octreotide, Interferon Alpha-2b5.6

[back to top] [back to top]

Objective Response (Confirmed and Unconfirmed Complete Response and Partial Response)

Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0): Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable disease, and no new lesions; Partial Response (PR) is greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target measurable lesions, no unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease, and no new lesions. Confirmed response is two or more objective statuses of CR a minimum of four weeks apart documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration. Partial response is two or more objective statuses of PR or better a minimum of four weeks apart documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration. Unconfirmed CR is one objective status of CR documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration but not qualifying as CR or PR. Unconfirmed PR is one objective status of PR documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration but not qualifying as CR, PR or unconfirmed CR. (NCT00569127)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseUnconfirmed Complete ResponseUnconfirmed Partial ResponseStable/No ResposneIncreasing DiseaseSymptomatic DeteriorationAssessment Inadequate
Octreotide, Bevacizumab2200713520016
Octreotide, Interferon Alpha-2b081613730317

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response at Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

Lesions that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter (LD) to be recorded) as > 20 mm with conventional techniques (CT, MRI) or as > 10 mm with spiral CT scan. All measurable lesions up to maximum of 5 lesions per organ and 10 lesions in total representative of all involved organs should be identified as target lesions and recorded and measured at baseline. Complete Response is defined as Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response is defined at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00582426)
Timeframe: Day 56, Day 84, Day 112, Day 140, Day 168

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Day 56 (N=11,2)Day 84 (N=5,3)Day 112 (N=1,1)Day 140 (N=9,1)Day 168 (N=2,1)
Octreotide Long Acting Release45.560.010044.4100
Standard Treatment0.01000.0100100

[back to top]

Number of Episodes of Diarrhea by Patient by Cycle

Mean number of episodes of diarrhea is evaluated by patient diaries recorded by cycle. (cycle 1 to cycle 7.) (NCT00582426)
Timeframe: at each cycle (28 days per cycle)

,
InterventionEpisodes/patient/cycle (Mean)
Cycle 1 (n=20, 18)Cycle 2 (n=36,38)Cycle 3 (n=33,39)Cycle 4 (n=24, 27)Cycle 5 (n=20,29)Cycle 6 (n=22, 22)Cycle 7 (n= 16, 20)
Octreotide Long Acting Release2.68.26.98.68.16.14.8
Standard Treatment2.25.96.77.175.86.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Need Intravenous Hydration for Control of Diarrhea

(NCT00582426)
Timeframe: 6 months overall

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Octreotide Long Acting Release4.5
Standard Treatment7.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Hospitalized Due to Diarrhea

(NCT00582426)
Timeframe: 6 months overall

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Octreotide Long Acting Release6
Standard Treatment4.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Episodes by Grade

Grade (severity)of episodes of diarrhea is evaluated by patient diaries recorded on a daily basis by considering only worse grade of diarrhea for each patient. Diarrhea was graded according to Common Toxicity Criteria where Grade 1 = Increase of <4 stools/day over pretreatment, Grade 2 = Increase of 4-6 stools/day, or nocturnal stools, Grade 3 = Increase of ≥7 stools/day or incontinence;or need for parenteral support for dehydration and Grade 4= Physiologic consequences requiring intensive care; or hemodynamic collapse. (NCT00582426)
Timeframe: 6 months overall

,
InterventionPercentage of Episodes (Number)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4
Octreotide Long Acting Release65.423.311.30
Standard Treatment66.927.25.90

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients by Grade of Diarrhea

Grade (severity) of episodes of diarrhea is evaluated by patient diaries recorded on a daily basis by considering only worse grade of diarrhea for each patient. Diarrhea was graded according to Common Toxicity Criteria where Grade 0 = None, 1 = Increase of <4 stools/day over pretreatment, Grade 2 = Increase of 4-6 stools/day, or nocturnal stools, Grade 3 = Increase of ≥7 stools/day or incontinence; or need for parenteral support for dehydration and Grade 4= Physiologic consequences requiring intensive care; or hemodynamic collapse. (NCT00582426)
Timeframe: 6 months overall

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4
Octreotide Long Acting Release41.225.533.30
Standard Treatment26.851.821.40

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Need Opioids for Control of Diarrhea

(NCT00582426)
Timeframe: 6 months overall

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Octreotide Long Acting Release1.5
Standard Treatment1.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Need Chemotherapy Dose Reduction Due to Diarrhea

For patient, chemotherapy dose reduction due to diarrhea as counted each time it occurred. Chemotherapy dose reduction because of other adverse events related to chemotherapy was not considered. (NCT00582426)
Timeframe: 6 months overall

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Octreotide Long Acting Release26.9
Standard Treatment11.3

[back to top]

Number of Episodes of Diarrhea by Patient

Number of episodes of diarrhea is evaluated by patient diaries recorded on a daily basis. (NCT00582426)
Timeframe: 6 months overall

InterventionEpisodes/patients/day (Mean)
Octreotide Long Acting Release21.6
Standard Treatment20.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Developing Diarrhea (Grade 1 to 4)

The percentage of patients developing diarrhea (incidence of grade 1 to 4) during treatment, considering only the worst grade of diarrhea for each patient. Diarrhea was graded according to Common Toxicity Criteria where Grade 0=None, 1 = Increase of <4 stools/day over pretreatment, Grade 2 = Increase of 4-6 stools/day, or nocturnal stools, Grade 3 = Increase of ≥7 stools/day or incontinence; or need for parenteral support for dehydration and Grade 4= Physiologic consequences requiring intensive care; or hemodynamic collapse. (NCT00582426)
Timeframe: 6 month overall

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Octreotide Long Acting Release76.1
Standard Treatment78.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Diarrhea (FACIT-D)

Quality of life (QoL) is evaluated using FACIT-D scale. FACIT-D is composed of 38 items, whose responses range from 0 to 4. The total FACIT-D score may range from 0 to 152. The 38 items compose five subscales, each evaluating a different component of the (QOL). For calculating the subscale score, some items are computed in a reverse fashion, so that higher FACIT-D scores indicate a better (QoL). Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum) are used to summarize FACIT-D scores (total and subscales) by study group at each time point. (NCT00582426)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 168

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Octreotide Long Acting Release0.5
Standard Treatment3.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Mean GH Level to <2.5 μg/L and the Normalization of IGF-1

"Percentage of participants with a reduction of mean GH levels to <2.5μg/L (based on a 5-point 2-hour profile) and normalization of sex- and age-adjusted IGF-1.~Post surgery = patients with prior surgery but no previous medical treatment for acromegaly De novo = patients with de novo disease who refused pituitary surgery or for whom pituitary surgery was contraindicated." (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
OverallPost SurgeryDe novo
Octreotide LAR (Core)19.221.817.3
Pasireotide LAR (Core)31.339.425.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Normalization of IGF-1

Percentage of participants with normalization of sex- and age-adjusted IGF-1. Analysis was based on data up to crossover (i.e., included data from both blinded core and extension phase up to 26 Months for patients who continued the same treatment in the extension. For patients who switched to the other treatment, only data collected before crossover was included). Denominator for time points up to Month 12 is the FAS. Denominator for time points after Month 12 excludes patients who completed the core and did not enter the extension. Patients who discontinued were considered non-responders for the time points after discontinuation, patients who crossed over were considered non-responders for all time points after crossover. (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 16, 19, 22, 25

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
M3M6M9M12M16M19M22M25
Octreotide LAR (Core & Extension)25.324.228.022.013.715.717.014.4
Pasireotide LAR (Core & Extension)35.235.834.135.829.925.225.925.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Normalization of IGF-1

Percentage of participants with normalization of sex- and age-adjusted IGF-1. Post surgery = patients with prior surgery but no previous medical treatment for acromegaly De novo = patients with de novo disease who refused pituitary surgery or for whom pituitary surgery was contraindicated. (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: 12 Months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
OverallPost surgeryDe novo
Octreotide LAR (Core)23.626.921.2
Pasireotide LAR (Core)38.650.730.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Normalization of IGF-1 After Crossover

Percentage of participants with normalization of sex- and age-adjusted IGF-1. Analysis was based on data after crossover (i.e., included data from blinded extension phase collected after the crossover time point for patients who crossed over). Denominator for all time points is the Crossover Analysis Set (CAS). (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Months 3, 6, 9, 12 after crossover

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
M3 after crossoverM6 after crossoverM9 after crossoverM12 after crossover
Crossed Over to Octreotide LAR (Extension)7.97.910.55.3
Crossed Over to Pasireotide LAR (Extension)19.830.929.627.2

[back to top]

Ring Size

Ring size (based on jeweler's finger gauge). Analysis was based on data up to crossover (i.e., included data from both blinded core and extension phase up to 26 Months for patients who continued the same treatment in the extension. For patients who switched to the other treatment, only data collected before crossover was included). (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 12, 25

,
Interventionring zize (Mean)
Baseline left hand (LH) 4th digitBaseline left hand 5th digitBaseline right hand (RH) 4th digitBaseline right hand 5th digitM12 LH 4th digitM12 LH 5th digitM12 RH 4th digitM12 RH 5th digitM25 LH 4th digitM25 LH 5th digitM25 RH 4th digitM25 RH 5th digit
Octreotide LAR (Core & Extension)11.812.411.411.311.112.411.310.511.114.310.97.5
Pasireotide LAR (Core & Extension)11.611.712.511.210.611.812.210.710.110.011.87.8

[back to top]

Ring Size After Crossover

Ring size (based on jeweler's finger gauge). Extension baseline was defined as last measurement prior to the start of crossover treatment. Analysis was based on data after crossover (i.e., included data from blinded extension phase collected after the crossover time point for patients who crossed over). BL = baseline, LH = left hand, RH = right hand, CO = crossover (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Extension baseline, month 12 after crossover

Interventionring size (Mean)
Ext. BL LH 4th digitExt. BL LH 5th digitExt. BL RH 4th digitM12 after CO LH 4th digitM12 after CO LH 5th digit COM12 after CO RH 4th digit
Crossed Over to Octreotide LAR (Extension)11.012.312.411.212.511.4

[back to top]

Ring Size After Crossover

Ring size (based on jeweler's finger gauge). Extension baseline was defined as last measurement prior to the start of crossover treatment. Analysis was based on data after crossover (i.e., included data from blinded extension phase collected after the crossover time point for patients who crossed over). BL = baseline, LH = left hand, RH = right hand, CO = crossover (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Extension baseline, month 12 after crossover

Interventionring size (Mean)
Ext. BL LH 4th digitExt. BL LH 5th digitExt. BL RH 4th digitExt. BL RH 5th digitM12 after CO LH 4th digitM12 after CO LH 5th digit COM12 after CO RH 4th digitM12 after CO RH 5th digit
Crossed Over to Pasireotide LAR (Extension)11.211.611.410.710.911.911.611.5

[back to top]

Severity Scores of Acromegaly Symptoms

Severity scores of acromegaly symptoms (Headache, Fatigue, Perspiration, Paresthesias, Osteoarthralgia). Symptoms were scored from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (very severe). Analysis was based on data up to crossover (i.e., included data from both blinded core and extension phase up to 26 Months for patients who continued the same treatment in the extension. For patients who switched to the other treatment, only data collected before crossover was included). (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 12, 25

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Headache - BaselineFatigue - BaselinePerspiration - BaselineParesthesia - BaselineOsteoarthraliga - BaselineHeadache - M12Fatigue - M12Perspiration - M12Paresthesia - M12Osteoarthraliga - M12Headache - M25Fatigue - M25Perspiration - M25Paresthesia - M25Osteoarthraliga - M25
Octreotide LAR (Core & Extension)1.01.41.30.81.30.60.70.50.40.70.60.70.40.40.8
Pasireotide LAR (Core & Extension)0.91.21.10.71.00.50.80.40.30.50.40.50.40.20.4

[back to top]

Severity Scores of Acromegaly Symptoms After Crossover

"Severity scores of acromegaly symptoms (Headache, Fatigue, Perspiration, Paresthesias, Osteoarthralgia).~Symptoms were scored from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (very severe). Extension baseline was defined as last measurement prior to the start of crossover treatment. Analysis was based on data after crossover (i.e., included data from blinded extension phase collected after the crossover time point for patients who crossed over)." (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Extension baseline, month 12 after crossover

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Headache: Ext. BLHeadache: M12 after crossoverFatigue: Ext. BLFatigue: M12 after crossoverPerspiration: Ext. BLPerspiration: M12 after crossoverParesthesia: Ext. BLParesthesia: M12 after crossoverOsteoarthralgia: Ext. BLOsteoarthralgia: M12 after crossover
Crossed Over to Octreotide LAR (Extension)0.40.70.70.70.60.50.40.40.60.7
Crossed Over to Pasireotide LAR (Extension)0.60.50.80.80.50.60.40.30.60.5

[back to top]

Summary of Mean GH Values

Mean GH levels (based on a 5-point profile over 2 hours). Analysis was based on data up to crossover (i.e., included data from both blinded core and extension phase up to 26 Months for patients who continued the same treatment in the extension. For patients who switched to the other treatment, only data collected before crossover was included). (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 16, 19, 22, 25

,
Interventionμg/L (Mean)
BaselineMonth 3Month 6Month 9Month 12Month 16Month 19Month 22Month 25
Octreotide LAR (Core & Extension)18.85.85.24.34.51.41.51.41.2
Pasireotide LAR (Core & Extension)21.96.35.64.94.62.32.12.12.0

[back to top]

Summary of Mean GH Values After Crossover

Mean GH levels (based on a 5-point profile over 2 hours). Extension baseline was defined as last measurement prior to the start of crossover treatment. Analysis was based on data after crossover (i.e., included data from blinded extension phase collected after the crossover time point for patients who crossed over). (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Extension baseline, months 3, 6, 9, 12 after crossover

,
Interventionμg/L (Mean)
Ext. BaselineM3 after crossoverM6 after crossoverM9 after crossoverM12 after crossover
Crossed Over to Octreotide LAR (Extension)7.19.89.88.710.4
Crossed Over to Pasireotide LAR (Extension)5.95.94.82.62.5

[back to top]

Summary of Prolactin Levels

Prolactin Levels. Analysis was based on data up to crossover (i.e., included data from both blinded core and extension phase up to 26 Months for patients who continued the same treatment in the extension. For patients who switched to the other treatment, only data collected before crossover was included). (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 12, 25

,
Interventionμg/L (Mean)
BaselineM12M25
Octreotide LAR (Core & Extension)15.811.76.7
Pasireotide LAR (Core & Extension)20.68.95.4

[back to top]

Summary of Prolactin Levels After Crossover

Prolactin (PRL) levels. Analysis was based on data after crossover (i.e., included data from blinded extension phase collected after the crossover time point for patients who crossed over). Extension baseline was defined as last measurement prior to the start of crossover treatment. (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Extension baseline, month 12 after crossover

,
Interventionμg/L (Mean)
Ext. BaselineM12 after crossover
Crossed Over to Octreotide LAR (Extension)15.716.1
Crossed Over to Pasireotide LAR (Extension)11.97.5

[back to top]

Octreotide Trough Concentrations by Incident Dose

Octreotide LAR trough concentrations by incident dose (last dose administered prior to PK sample collection). PK observations with missing concentrations, missing dose, missing elapsed time or an elapsed time from previous injection outside of 28±2 days window were excluded. (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Months 1 - 12

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
M2M3M4M6M7M12
Octreotide LAR 10mg0.610.620.191.330.700.30

[back to top]

Duration of Response for Patients Achieving a Reduction of Mean GH Level to <2.5 μg/L and the Normalization of IGF-1 at Month 12 (No. of Responders: Pasireotide LAR = 51, Octreotide LAR = 32)

"The duration of response is defined as the time from the date that patient first met and maintained the response criteria based on primary efficacy variable to the date that patient lost response status.~Median and corresponding 95% CI are derived based on Kaplan-Meier method. Analysis was based on data up to crossover (i.e., included data from both blinded core and extension phase up to 26 Months for patients who continued the same treatment in the extension. For patients who switched to the other treatment, only data collected before crossover was included)." (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Up to 26 months

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Pasireotide LAR (Core & Extension)64.4
Octreotide LAR (Core & Extension)64.6

[back to top]

Time to First Response for Patients Achieving a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5 μg/L and Normalization of IGF-1 (No. of Responders: Pasireotite LAR = 81, Octreotide LAR = 63) )

Time to first response for patients achieving a reduction of mean GH level to < 2.5 μg/L and normalization of IGF-1. Analysis was based on data up to crossover (i.e., included data from both blinded core and extension phase up to 26 Months for patients who continued the same treatment in the extension. For patients who switched to the other treatment, only data collected before crossover was included). (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Up to 26 months

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Pasireotide LAR (Core & Extension)12.6
Octreotide LAR (Core & Extension)12.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Tumor Volume

Percentage change from baseline in tumor volume (assessed by pituitary MRI). Analysis was based on data up to crossover (i.e., included data from both blinded core and extension phase up to 26 Months for patients who continued the same treatment in the extension. For patients who switched to the other treatment, only data collected before crossover was included). (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Baseline, months 6, 12, 19, 25

,
Interventionmm^3 (Mean)
BaselineM6M12M19M25% change at M6% change at M12% change at M19% change at M25
Octreotide LAR (Core & Extension)2259.21565.41390.41009.9814.1-28.8-38.0-47.2-55.0
Pasireotide LAR (Core & Extension)2420.71614.11482.4956.6840.4-29.9-39.7-48.9-51.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Tumor Volume at 12 Months

Absolute and percentage change from baseline in tumor volume (assessed by pituitary MRI) Post surgery = patients with prior surgery but no previous medical treatment for acromegaly De novo = patients with de novo disease who refused pituitary surgery or for whom pituitary surgery was contraindicated. (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Months

,
Interventionmm^3 (Mean)
Overall at baselineOverall % change at month 12Post surgery at baselinePost surgery % change at month 12De novo at baselineDe novo % change at month 12Overall absolute change at month 12Post surgery abs. change at month 12De novo absolute change at month 12
Octreotide LAR (Core)2259.2-38.02196.5-39.02308.1-37.2-801.2-713.8-867.1
Pasireotide LAR (Core)2420.7-39.72185.2-39.52592.4-39.9-987.1-873.7-1051.9

[back to top]

Change From Extension Baseline in Tumor Volume After Crossover

"Percentage change from extension baseline in tumor volume (assessed by pituitary MRI).~Extension baseline was defined as last assessment prior to the administration of the new treatment after crossover. Analysis was based on data after crossover (i.e., included data from blinded extension phase collected after the crossover time point for patients who crossed over)." (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Extension baseline, months 6, 12 after crossover

,
Interventionmm^3 (Mean)
Ext. BaselineValue at M6 after crossover% change - M6 after crossoverValue at M12 after crossover% change - M12 after crossover
Crossed Over to Octreotide LAR (Extension)1809.61794.9-12.31610.4-17.9
Crossed Over to Pasireotide LAR (Extension)1420.91027.5-18.1949.0-24.7

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Octreotide Trough Concentrations by Incident Dose

Octreotide LAR trough concentrations by incident dose (last dose administered prior to PK sample collection). PK observations with missing concentrations, missing dose, missing elapsed time or an elapsed time from previous injection outside of 28±2 days window were excluded. (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Months 1 - 12

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
M1M2M3M4M5M6M7M8M9M10M11M12
Octreotide LAR 20 mg0.861.211.291.451.651.581.461.551.741.661.741.58

[back to top]

Octreotide Trough Concentrations by Incident Dose

Octreotide LAR trough concentrations by incident dose (last dose administered prior to PK sample collection). PK observations with missing concentrations, missing dose, missing elapsed time or an elapsed time from previous injection outside of 28±2 days window were excluded. (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Months 1 - 12

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
M4M5M6M7M8M9M10M11M12
Octreotide LAR 30 mg1.552.142.122.142.162.202.502.392.55

[back to top]

Pasireotide Trough Concentrations by Incident Dose

"Pasireotide LAR trough concentrations by incident dose (last dose administered prior to PK sample collection). PK observations with missing concentrations, missing dose, missing elapsed time or an elapsed time from previous injection outside of 28±2 days window were excluded.~5 patients with evaluable PK data in the pasireotide arm received erroneously 20 mg pasireotide LAR at baseline." (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Months 1 - 12

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
M1M2M3M4M5M6M7M8M9M10M11M12
Pasireotide LAR 20 mg4.652.883.393.935.222.872.293.654.805.665.104.54
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg6.657.818.709.5110.9210.5911.8512.3312.7512.4212.6211.11

[back to top]

Pasireotide Trough Concentrations by Incident Dose

"Pasireotide LAR trough concentrations by incident dose (last dose administered prior to PK sample collection). PK observations with missing concentrations, missing dose, missing elapsed time or an elapsed time from previous injection outside of 28±2 days window were excluded.~5 patients with evaluable PK data in the pasireotide arm received erroneously 20 mg pasireotide LAR at baseline." (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Months 1 - 12

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
M4M5M6M7M8M9M10M11M12
Pasireotide LAR 60mg13.4813.4213.0814.7615.8816.0316.0116.3116.16

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5μg/L

"Percentage of participants with a reduction of mean GH levels to < 2.5μg/L (based on a 5-point 2-hour profile).~Analysis was based on data up to crossover (i.e., included data from both blinded core and extension phase up to 26 Months for patients who continued the same treatment in the extension. For patients who switched to the other treatment, only data collected before crossover was included). Denominator for time points up to Month 12 is the Full Analysis Set. Denominator for time points after Month 12 excludes patients who completed the core and did not enter the extension. Patients who discontinued were considered non-responders for the time points after discontinuation, patients who crossed over were considered non-responders for all time points after crossover." (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 16, 19, 22, 25

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
M3M6M9M12M16M19M22M25
Octreotide LAR (Core & Extension)43.447.846.247.322.221.622.224.2
Pasireotide LAR (Core & Extension)49.445.542.643.233.336.735.435.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5μg/L

"Percentage of participants with a reduction of mean GH levels to < 2.5μg/L (based on a 5-point 2-hour profile).~Post surgery = patients with prior surgery but no previous medical treatment for acromegaly De novo = patients with de novo disease who refused pituitary surgery or for whom pituitary surgery was contraindicated." (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: 12 Months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
OverallPost surgeryDe novo
Octreotide LAR (Core)51.651.351.9
Pasireotide LAR (Core)48.352.145.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5μg/L After Crossover

Percentage of participants with a reduction of mean GH levels to < 2.5μg/L (based on a 5-point 2-hour profile). Analysis was based on data after crossover (i.e., included data from blinded extension phase collected after the crossover time point for patients who crossed over). Denominator for all time points is the Crossover Analysis Set (CAS). (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Months 3, 6, 9, 12 after crossover

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
M3 after crossoverM6 after crossoverM9 after crossoverM12 after crossover
Crossed Over to Octreotide LAR (Extension)28.931.631.623.7
Crossed Over to Pasireotide LAR (Extension)49.443.254.344.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5μg/L and Normalization of IGF-1

"Percentage of participants with a reduction of mean GH levels to < 2.5μg/L (based on a 5-point 2-hour profile) and normalization of sex- and age-adjusted IGF-1.~Denominator for time points up to Month 12 is the Full Analysis Set (FAS). Denominator for time points after Month 12 excludes patients who completed the core and did not enter the extension. Patients who discontinued were considered non-responders for the time points after discontinuation, patients who crossed over were considered non-responders for all time points after crossover. Analysis was based on data up to crossover (i.e., included data from both blinded core & ext. phase up to 26 Months for patients who continued the same treatment in the extension. For patients who switched to the other treatment, only data collected before crossover was included.)" (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 16, 19, 22, 25

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12Month 16Month 19Month 22Month 25
Octreotide LAR (Core & Extension)21.419.823.117.612.413.716.313.7
Pasireotide LAR (Core & Extension)30.130.127.829.025.223.125.224.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5μg/L and Normalization of IGF-1 After Crossover

Percentage of participants with a reduction of mean GH levels to < 2.5μg/L (based on a 5-point 2-hour profile) and normalization of sex- and age-adjusted IGF-1. Analysis was based on data after crossover (i.e., included data from blinded extension phase collected after the crossover time point for patients who crossed over). Denominator for all time points is the Crossover Analysis Set (CAS). (NCT00600886)
Timeframe: Months 3, 6, 9, 12 after crossover

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
M3 after crossoverM6 after crossoverM9 after crossoverM12 after crossover
Crossed Over to Octreotide LAR (Extension)2.62.65.30.0
Crossed Over to Pasireotide LAR (Extension)17.321.022.217.3

[back to top]

Objective Tumor Response Rate Assessed by Investigator

Baseline evaluations were to include Triphasic CT scan or MRI of the abdomen. Triphasic CT or MRIs were to be read by same radiologist at each assessment, measuring the same target and non-target lesions and accounting for all lesions that were present at Baseline. All known disease was accounted for when assessing objective tumor status. Current objective tumor status was to be captured on Tumor Assessment CRF. Objective response rate was defined by RECIST criteria: Partial response (PR) must have ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter of all target lesions, from the baseline sum. Complete response (CR) must have disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. For CR or PR, tumor measurements must be confirmed by 2nd assessments within 4 weeks. Progression = 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of all target lesions, from smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline; or a new lesion; or progression of non-target lesions. (NCT00690430)
Timeframe: Month 6

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Pasireotide LAR2.0
Octreotide LAR3.8

[back to top]

Pasireotide LAR vs. Octreotide LAR on Disease Control Rate Based on RECIST Criteria

Disease control rate (DCR) is the proportion of patients with a best overall response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD). Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, or a new lesion; or progression of non-target lesions. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for PD. Unknown (UNK) Progression has not been documented and one or more target lesions have not been assessed or have been assessed using a different method than baseline. (NCT00690430)
Timeframe: Month 6

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Pasireotide LAR62.7
Octreotide LAR46.2

[back to top]

Improvement in Daily Mean Number of Diarrhea Bowel Movement Episodes by Randomization Stratum and Treatment.

Percent change from Baseline in mean daily bowel movements at Month 6 were compared between the two treatment groups using ANCOVA model with treatment as the main effect and symptom levels at Baseline (e.g. mean daily bowel movement at Baseline) and randomization stratum (D+F or D) as covariates. Percentage change = (Month 6 - baseline)/baseline. (NCT00690430)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionPercentage of Episodes (Mean)
Diarrhea and Flushing (N=24, 28)Predominantly Diarrhea (D) (N=2, 4)Overall (N=26, 32)
Octreotide LAR-38.4-22.9-36.5
Pasireotide LAR-23.5-44.2-25.1

[back to top]

Improvement in Daily Mean Number of Flushing Episodes by Randomization Stratum and Treatment.

Percent change from Baseline in total number of flushing episodes comprising Month 6 were compared between the two treatment groups using ANCOVA model with treatment as the main effect and symptom levels at Baseline (e.g. total number of flushing episodes at Baseline) and randomization stratum (D+F or F) as covariates. (NCT00690430)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
InterventionPercentage of Episodes (Mean)
Diarrhea and Flushing (N=24, 28)Predominately Flushing (N=4, 1)Overall (N=28, 29)
Octreotide LAR-52.847.2-49.4
Pasireotide LAR-41.0-48.4-42.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Improvement by Randomization Stratum and Treatment.

Percentage of patients who received clinical benefit in symptom (diarrhea and/or flushing) improvement as: Diarrhea (D)+Flushing (F): Patients with a daily mean number (#) of at least four bowel movements and a total of five or more flushing episodes. Clinical Benefit Response Criteria (CBRC): <4 daily mean bowel movements AND at least 20% reduction from Baseline in the daily mean # of bowel movements AND any reduction in the total # of flushing episodes compared with Baseline. (D) Patients with a daily mean # of at least four bowel movements and a total # of <5 flushing episodes. (CBRC) <4 daily mean bowel movements AND at least a 20% reduction from Baseline in the daily mean # of bowel movements. (F) Patients with a total # of at least 14 flushing episodes and a daily mean # of <4 bowel movements (CBRC) At least a 30% reduction from Baseline in the total # of flushing episodes. (NCT00690430)
Timeframe: Month 6

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Diarrhea and Flushing (N=37, 39)Diarrhea (N=2, 5)Flushing (N=4, 1)Overall (N=43, 45)
Octreotide LAR28.220.00.026.7
Pasireotide LAR13.51005020.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Modified Objective Response Rate (ORR) of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Minor Response (MR) Modified Objective Response Rate (mORR)

Modified ORR is defined as CR+ PR + MR. According to RECIST v1.0, CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; PR defined as a >30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (LD) of the target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the LD and MR defined as 20% - 29% reduction. Disease progression defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the baseline measurements, and/or the appearance of one or more new lesion(s), and/or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions. (NCT00781911)
Timeframe: From Start of Treatment Baseline to Disease Progression (Up to 18 Months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Carcinoid Tumor3.2
Islet Cell Carcinoma0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Number of participants that had at least one TEAE is presented. A summary of other non-serious adverse events and all serious adverse events, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events Section. (NCT00781911)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Carcinoid Tumor31
Islet Cell Carcinoma12

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Biochemical Response Rate

Determine the biochemical response rate (≥ 50% reduction in tumor-specific markers; may include, not limited to 24 hour urine 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, chromogranin A, adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH), or gastrin) in the subset of participants with biochemically measurable disease. (NCT00781911)
Timeframe: From Start of Treatment Up to 18 Months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Chromogranin AGastrin
Carcinoid Tumor0.00.0
Islet Cell Carcinoma22.20.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Six Months

Percentage of participants who are alive and progression-free at 6 month from start of the study treatment over all participants. PFS is defined as the time from the start of study treatment until the date of objectively determined progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. Disease progression was assessed via Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0, and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the baseline measurements, and/or the appearance of one or more new lesion(s), and/or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions. Participants without documentation of progression or death will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment. The PFS was estimated by the binomial distribution and Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00781911)
Timeframe: From Start of Study Treatment to Progressive Disease or Death Due to Any Cause (Up to 6 Months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Binomial Distribution; Primary AnalysisKaplan-Meier Method; Secondary Analysis
Carcinoid Tumor45.254.1
Islet Cell Carcinoma41.761.4

[back to top]

Time to First Rescue, Short-acting Octreotide

Time to the first subcutaneous injections of rescue, short-acting octreotide was determined from the participant's daily diary. (NCT00853047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo Core Phase1.00
Telotristat Etiprate 500 mg Core Phase1.00

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Bowel Movements (BMs) Per Day

Participants recorded the number of BMs per day in a daily diary. The total number of BMs per day were averaged over the 4-week period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT00853047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

Interventionbowel movements/day (Mean)
Placebo Core Phase0.82
Telotristat Etiprate 150 mg Core Phase-1.37
Telotristat Etiprate 250 mg Core Phase-2.17
Telotristat Etiprate 350 mg Core Phase-0.20
Telotristat Etiprate 500 mg Core Phase-0.71

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any TEAE in the Open-Label Extension Phase

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. A TEAE was an AE reported after receiving treatment. (NCT00853047)
Timeframe: Up to 180 weeks in the open-label extension phase

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Telotristat Etiprate Open-Label Extension Phase18

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Complete Response at Week 4

"Complete Response to treatment was defined as one of the following: 1. Less than 4 bowel movements per day; or 2. A decrease in daily bowel movements that is ≥ 50% from baseline; or 3. A positive response to the global assessment question (In the past 7 days, have you had adequate relief of your carcinoid syndrome bowel complaints such as diarrhea, urgent need to have a bowel movement, abdominal pain or discomfort?) for each of the last 2 weeks of the Treatment Period." (NCT00853047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo Core Phase0
Telotristat Etiprate 150 mg Core Phase1
Telotristat Etiprate 250 mg Core Phase2
Telotristat Etiprate 350 mg Core Phase1
Telotristat Etiprate 500 mg Core Phase2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting Improvement in the Subjective Global Assessment of Symptoms Associated With Carcinoid Syndrome

"Participants were asked to answer the following question: In the past 7 days, have you had adequate relief of your carcinoid syndrome bowel complaints such as diarrhea, urgent need to have a bowel movement, abdominal pain, or discomfort?. The number of participants who answered Yes are reported." (NCT00853047)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo Core Phase0
Telotristat Etiprate 150 mg Core Phase1
Telotristat Etiprate 250 mg Core Phase2
Telotristat Etiprate 350 mg Core Phase1
Telotristat Etiprate 500 mg Core Phase3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (u5-HIAA)

u5-HIAA is a standard test used in clinical practice to assess the neuroendocrine tumor (NET) activity and is collected as a 24-hour urine specimen. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT00853047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

Interventionmg/24 hours (Mean)
Placebo Core Phase-20.73
Telotristat Etiprate 150 mg Core Phase-27.55
Telotristat Etiprate 250 mg Core Phase-0.67
Telotristat Etiprate 350 mg Core Phase13.60
Telotristat Etiprate 500 mg Core Phase-35.49

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Severity of Abdominal Pain or Discomfort

Participants recorded the severity of abdominal pain or discomfort in a daily diary assessed using a 4-point scale (0-none, 1-mild, 2-moderate, 3-severe). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT00853047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Core Phase0.04
Telotristat Etiprate 150 mg Core Phase0.03
Telotristat Etiprate 250 mg Core Phase-0.53
Telotristat Etiprate 350 mg Core Phase0.03
Telotristat Etiprate 500 mg Core Phase0.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Days Per Week Experiencing a Sensation of Urgency to Defecate

Participants recorded the sensation of urgency to defecate (Yes or No) in a daily diary. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT00853047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Placebo Core Phase-2.72
Telotristat Etiprate 150 mg Core Phase-34.43
Telotristat Etiprate 250 mg Core Phase-32.13
Telotristat Etiprate 350 mg Core Phase0.00
Telotristat Etiprate 500 mg Core Phase-8.49

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Cutaneous Flushing Episodes

Participants recorded the number of daily flushing episodes per day in a daily diary. The total number of flushing episodes per day were averaged over the 4-week period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT00853047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

Interventioncutaneous flushing episodes (Mean)
Placebo Core Phase-0.43
Telotristat Etiprate 150 mg Core Phase-0.60
Telotristat Etiprate 250 mg Core Phase-0.30
Telotristat Etiprate 350 mg Core Phase-0.10
Telotristat Etiprate 500 mg Core Phase-0.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Frequency of Rescue for Short-acting Octreotide Use/Day

Participants recorded details (location and frequency of injection) of subcutaneous injections of rescue, short-acting octreotide, if taken, in the daily diary. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT00853047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

Interventioninjections per day (Mean)
Placebo Core Phase-0.38
Telotristat Etiprate 150 mg Core Phase-0.03
Telotristat Etiprate 250 mg Core Phase0.03
Telotristat Etiprate 350 mg Core Phase0.00
Telotristat Etiprate 500 mg Core Phase-0.29

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Stool Form

Participants recorded stool form in a daily diary using a 6-point scale (0-none,1-hard, 2-firm, 3-soft, 4-loose, 5-watery). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT00853047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Core Phase-0.07
Telotristat Etiprate 150 mg Core Phase-0.50
Telotristat Etiprate 250 mg Core Phase0.00
Telotristat Etiprate 350 mg Core Phase0.00
Telotristat Etiprate 500 mg Core Phase-0.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Chromogranin A

Blood samples were collected for assessment of Chromogranin A level. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT00853047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Placebo Core Phase-3251.2
Telotristat Etiprate 150 mg Core Phase-190.5
Telotristat Etiprate 250 mg Core Phase-12.3
Telotristat Etiprate 350 mg Core Phase52.5
Telotristat Etiprate 500 mg Core Phase26011.4

[back to top]

5-day Treatment Failure (Failure to Control Bleeding, Rebleeding, or Death)

(NCT00966355)
Timeframe: 5 days after enrollment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Octreotide218
Somatostatin216
Terlipressin225

[back to top]

Active Bleeding During the First Endoscopic Exam, Needing Blood Transfusion for 5 Days, Experiencing Adverse Effects

at least one of the three criteria (NCT00966355)
Timeframe: 5 days after enrollment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Octreotide113
Somatostatin115
Terlipressin114

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

The Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Death (NCT01121939)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Typical CarcinoidNA
Pancreatic Islet Cell26.4

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

The Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Worsening of Their Disease. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01121939)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Typical Carcinoid11.96
Pancreatic Islet Cell5.49

[back to top]

Define Toxicity and Safety

To define the toxicity and safety of the combination of bevacizumab, pertuzumab and Sandostatin LAR® when used in patients with advanced low grade neuroendocrine cancer - defined by grade 3/4, treatment-related toxicity (NCT01121939)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
HypertensionPainLeft ventricular systolic dysfunctionDiarrheaAnemiaLeukopenia
All Patients1155311

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate

The Percentage of Patients Who Experience an Objective Benefit From Treatment or Experience Stable Disease. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), Neither Sufficient Shrinkage to Qualify For PR, Nor Sufficient Increase to Qualify for Progressive Disease; Disease Control Rate = CR + PR + SD. (NCT01121939)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Typical Carcinoid72
Pancreatic Islet Cell91
All Patients77

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

The Percentage of Patients Who Experience an Objective Benefit From Treatment. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01121939)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Typical Carcinoid16
Pancreatic Islet Cell18
All Patients16

[back to top]

Duration of the First Response for Patients Achieving a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5 μg/L and Normalization of IGF-1 and Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly (Extension Full Analysis Set)

n is the number of patients achieving response criteria. The weeks correspond to duration of first response (in weeks) for patients achieving biomedical control. Median and 95% CI are derived from Kaplan-Meier curves. Kaplan-Meier estimates [95% CI] at each time point are estimates of probability of response. (NCT01137682)
Timeframe: CORE baseline up to approximately 268 weeks

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg Extension29.1
Pasireotide LAR 60 mg Extension26.9
Cross Over to Pasireotide Extension24.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Mean GH Levels to < 2.5 µg/L and Normalization of Sex- and Age-adjusted IGF-1.

The primary objective of this study was to compare the percentage of patients achieving biochemical control (defined as mean GH levels <2.5 µg/L and normalization of sex- and age- adjusted IGF-1) at 24 weeks with pasireotide LAR 40 mg and pasireotide LAR 60 mg separately versus continued treatment with octreotide LAR 30 mg or lanreotide autogel (ATG) 120 mg. The primary efficacy variable is the proportion of patients with a reduction of mean GH levels to < 2.5 µg/L and normalization of sex- and age-adjusted IGF-1 at 24 weeks. (NCT01137682)
Timeframe: At 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg15.4
Pasireotide LAR 60 mg20.0
Control Arm (Octreotide or Lanreotide)0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Mean GH <1.0 μg/L Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly (Extension Full Analysis Set)

The percentage of patients achieving mean growth hormone (GH) levels < 1.0 μg/L was calculated with two sided 95% confidence interval. All GH assessments were based on a 5-point mean growth hormone (GH) assessed from a 2-hour profile. Scheduled time points for blood sampling were pre-dose at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. Concomitant medication known to affect GH levels were allowed in patients who were not biochemically controlled after at least one year treatment with pasireotide LAR monotherapy: dopamine agonists and growth hormone receptor antagonists (Extension full analysis set) (NCT01137682)
Timeframe: Extension baseline up to approximately week 268

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 16Week 28Week 40Week 52Week 64Week 76Week 88Week 100Week 112Week 124Week 136Week 148Week 160Week 172Week 184Week 196Week 208Week 220Week 232Week 244Week 256Week 268
Cross Over to Pasireotide Extension8.19.74.89.711.311.311.317.716.114.514.514.514.514.56.512.99.79.78.18.14.81.6
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg Extension14.014.014.012.315.812.315.817.517.512.38.814.017.517.517.515.817.515.815.812.312.33.5
Pasireotide LAR 60 mg Extension27.822.213.022.218.522.222.220.425.916.725.916.718.514.818.513.013.011.13.75.63.73.7

[back to top]

Time to First Response (Weeks) by Treatment for Patients Achieving a Reduction of Mean GH Level to < 2.5 µg/L and Normalization of IGF-1 and Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly

Time to first response is defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of first occurrence of a reduction of mean GH < 2.5 µg/L and the normalization of IGF-1. The weeks correspond to time taken to achieve first mean GH < 2.5 µg/L and the normalization of IGF-1. (NCT01137682)
Timeframe: CORE baseline up to approximately 268 weeks

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg Extension112.3
Pasireotide LAR 60 mg Extension65.3
Cross Over to Pasireotide Extension95.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AcroQoL Total Scores for Patients Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly for CORE Visits(Extension Full Analysis Set)

Acromegaly Quality of Life questionnaire (AcroQoL) is a validated disease specific questionnaire. It contains 22 items divided into two scales: physical aspects (8 items) and psychological aspects (14 items) which is divided in two sub-scales: physical appearance and personal relationships of the patient (seven items each). The total score and sub-scores were calculated using the following formula: ((X -Y) / 4Y) x 100, X=sum of the scores for individual items (between 1 and 5 for each item), Y=number of individual items included in above sum (i.e. 22 for the total score, 8 for the physical sub-score, 14 for the psychological sub-score, 7 for the sub-score 'appearance' and 'personal relations'). The scoring of the questionnaire was performed as specified by the instrument developers. Total scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent better quality of life. If more than 25% of items are not completed, results were considered invalid. (NCT01137682)
Timeframe: CORE baseline up to approximately 24 weeks

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Week 4 COREWeek 8 COREWeek 12 COREWeek 16 COREWeek 20 COREWeek24 CORE
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg3.52.43.03.33.53.0
Pasireotide LAR 60 mg2.32.51.96.64.05.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AcroQoL Total Scores for Patients Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly for Extension Visits (Extension Full Analysis Set)

Acromegaly Quality of Life questionnaire (AcroQoL) is a validated disease specific questionnaire. It contains 22 items divided into two scales: physical aspects (8 items) and psychological aspects (14 items) which is divided in two sub-scales: physical appearance and personal relationships of the patient (seven items each). The total score and sub-scores were calculated using the following formula: ((X -Y) / 4Y) x 100, X=sum of the scores for individual items (between 1 and 5 for each item), Y=number of individual items included in above sum (i.e. 22 for the total score, 8 for the physical sub-score, 14 for the psychological sub-score, 7 for the sub-score 'appearance' and 'personal relations'). The scoring of the questionnaire was performed as specified by the instrument developers. Total scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent better quality of life. If more than 25% of items are not completed, results were considered invalid. (NCT01137682)
Timeframe: CORE Baseline and extension baseline up to approximately 268 weeks

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Week 16 extensionWeek 28 extensionWeek 40 extensionWeek 52 extensionWeek 64 extensionWeek 76 extensionWeek 88 extensionWeek 100 extensionWeek 112 extensionWeek 124 extensionWeek 136 extensionWeek 148 extensionWeek 160 extensionWeek 172 extensionWeek 184 extensionWeek 196 extensionWeek 208 extensionWeek 220 extensionWeek 232 extensionWeek 244 extensionWeek 256 extensionWeek 268 extension
Cross Over to Pasireotide Extension0.83.33.24.25.47.76.45.94.12.06.55.51.52.11.63.84.57.37.03.00.3-10.6
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg Extension4.25.63.26.15.87.74.64.34.65.87.57.67.04.85.86.11.24.82.14.56.10.6
Pasireotide LAR 60 mg Extension2.94.82.55.74.22.55.63.96.52.05.46.85.15.75.86.06.25.8-0.26.3-3.0-4.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean GH Values for Patients Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly for CORE Visits (Extension Full Analysis Set)

(NCT01137682)
Timeframe: CORE baseline up to approximately 24 weeks

,
Interventionmcg/L (Mean)
Week 12 - COREWeek 24 - CORE
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg-0.8-0.6
Pasireotide LAR 60 mg-6.4-7.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean GH Values for Patients Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly for Extension Visits (Extension Full Analysis Set)

Change from CORE baseline at each scheduled assessment was performed for patients randomized to pasireotide arms. Change from extension baseline at each scheduled assessment was performed for patients randomized to active control arm. (NCT01137682)
Timeframe: CORE and extension baseline up to approximately 268 weeks

,,
Interventionmcg/L (Mean)
Week 16 - extensionWeek 28 - extensionWeek 40 - extensionWeek 52 - extensionWeek 64 - extensionWeek 76 - extensionWeek 88 - extensionWeek 100 - extensionWeek 112 - extensionWeek 124 - extensionWeek 136 - extensionWeek 148 - extensionWeek 160 - extensionWeek 172 - extensionWeek 184 - extensionWeek 196 - extensionWeek 208 - extension (n=22,20,23)Week 220 - extensionWeek 232 - extensionWeek 244 - extensionWeek 256 - extensionWeek 268 - extension
Cross Over to Pasireotide Extension-8.4-3.0-11.2-2.5-15.7-3.5-3.6-3.8-3.9-4.0-4.0-3.8-3.2-3.0-3.3-3.4-3.5-3.8-4.2-4.2-5.0-3.7
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg Extension-7.9-9.0-9.7-10.7-11.3-5.5-5.7-5.6-5.8-5.5-6.0-6.3-5.5-6.3-6.3-7.1-7.0-7.1-5.7-6.0-6.4-3.6
Pasireotide LAR 60 mg Extension-6.9-4.5-5.8-7.1-7.9-7.2-6.2-5.3-4.4-6.0-5.36.1-4.9-5.9-5.8-6.5-6.2-7.1-6.8-2.4-4.9-2.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Standardized IGF-1 Values for Patients Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly for CORE Visits (Extension Full Analysis Set)

Standardized IGF-1 = IGF-1 value / ULN, where ULN is the upper limit of the normal range (NCT01137682)
Timeframe: CORE baseline up to approximately 24 weeks

,
Interventionmcg/L (Mean)
CORE Week 12CORE Week 24
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg0.7-0.7
Pasireotide LAR 60 mg-1.1-1.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Standardized IGF-1 Values for Patients Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly for Extension Visits (Extension Full Analysis Set)

Change from CORE baseline at each scheduled assessment was performed for patients randomized to pasireotide arms. Change from extension baseline at each scheduled assessment was performed for patients randomized to active control arm. Standardized IGF-1 = IGF-1 value / ULN, where ULN is the upper limit of the normal range (NCT01137682)
Timeframe: CORE and extension baseline up to approximately 268 weeks

,,
Interventionmcg/L (Mean)
Week 16 extensionWeek 28 extensionWeek 40 extensionWeek 52 extensionWeek 64 extensionWeek 76 extensionWeek 88 extensionWeek 100 extensionWeek 112 extensionWeek 124 extensionWeek 136 extensionWeek 148 extensionWeek 160 extensionWeek 172 extensionWeek 184 extensionWeek 196 extensionWeek 208 extensionWeek 220 extensionWeek 232 extensionWeek 244 extensionWeek 256 extensionWeek 268 extension
Cross Over to Pasireotide Extension-0.9-0.9-1.1-1.1-1.3-1.3-1.3-1.3-1.4-1.3-1.4-1.3-1.4-1.3-1.4-1.3-1.2-1.4-1.7-1.5-1.8-1.7
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg Extension-0.8-0.9-1.1-1.1-1.3-1.3-1.3-1.4-1.5-1.4-1.4-1.4-1.4-1.5-1.3-1.4-1.4-1.4-1.4-1.3-1.3-1.4
Pasireotide LAR 60 mg Extension-1.4-1.3-1.4-1.3-1.4-1.5-1.6-1.5-1.5-1.5-1.7-1.5-1.6-1.6-1.5-1.5-1.6-1.6-1.5-1.9-1.4-1.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Normalization of Sex- and Age-adjusted IGF-1treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly (Extension Full Analysis Set).

The percentage of patients achieving normalization of sex and age-adjusted IGF-1 was calculated with two sided 95% confidence interval. Total insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) levels were assessed with one pre-dose sample at the same visits as GH. Concomitant medication known to affect IGF-1 levels were allowed in patients who were not biochemically controlled after at least one year treatment with pasireotide LAR monotherapy: dopamine agonists and growth hormone receptor antagonists (Extension full analysis set) (NCT01137682)
Timeframe: Extension baseline up to approximately week 268

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 16Week 28Week 40Week 52Week 64Week 76Week 88Week 100Week 112Week 124Week 136Week 148Week 160Week 172Week 184Week 196Week 208Week 220Week 232Week 244Week 256Week 268
Cross Over to Pasireotide Extension25.822.624.225.829.029.025.832.330.629.037.133.933.922.622.627.421.019.417.714.56.51.6
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg Extension33.329.836.828.133.326.328.131.631.624.621.126.324.626.319.324.622.822.814.014.012.35.3
Pasireotide LAR 60 mg Extension29.033.337.033.327.835.235.229.627.831.525.922.225.922.222.222.222.211.114.89.37.45.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Mean GH < 1.0 μg/L and Normalization of IGF-1, Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly (Extension Full Analysis Set)

The percentage of patients achieving mean growth hormone (GH) levels < 1.0 μg/L and normalization of sex and age-adjusted IGF-1 was calculated with two sided 95% confidence interval. All GH assessments were based on a 5-point mean growth hormone (GH) assessed from a 2-hour profile. Scheduled time points for blood sampling were pre-dose at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. Total insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) levels were assessed with one pre-dose sample at the same visits as GH. Concomitant medication known to affect GH or IGF-1 levels were allowed in patients who were not biochemically controlled after at least one year treatment with pasireotide LAR monotherapy: dopamine agonists and growth hormone receptor antagonists (Extension full analysis set (NCT01137682)
Timeframe: Extension baseline up to approximately week 268

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Week 16Week 28Week 40Week 52Week 64Week 76Week 88Week 100Week 112Week 124Week 136Week 148Week 160Week 172Week 184Week 196Week 208Week 220Week 232Week 244Week 256Week 268
Cross Over to Pasireotide Extension6.58.14.84.89.76.54.88.19.78.111.38.19.78.13.28.16.56.54.86.53.21.6
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg Extension10.58.810.58.88.810.57.012.314.07.03.510.58.814.07.08.88.810.510.58.88.81.8
Pasireotide LAR 60 mg Extension16.714.89.313.013.013.020.414.820.414.818.514.814.813.013.013.09.37.43.73.73.73.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Mean GH < 2.5 μg/L and Normalization of IGF-1, Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly (Extension Full Analysis Set)

The percentage of patients achieving mean growth hormone (GH) levels < 2.5 μg/L and normalization of sex and age-adjusted IGF-1 was calculated with two sided 95% confidence interval. All GH assessments were based on a 5-point mean growth hormone (GH) assessed from a 2-hour profile. Scheduled time points for blood sampling were pre-dose at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. Total insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) levels were assessed with one pre-dose sample at the same visits as GH. Concomitant medication known to affect GH or IGF-1 levels were allowed in patients who were not biochemically controlled after at least one year treatment with pasireotide LAR monotherapy: dopamine agonists and growth hormone receptor antagonists (extension full analysis set) (NCT01137682)
Timeframe: Extension baseline up to approximately week 268

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 16Week 28Week 40Week 52Week 64Week 76Week 88Week 100Week 112Week 124Week 136Week 148Week 160Week 172Week 184Week 196Week 208Week 220Week 232Week 244Week 256Week 268
Cross Over to Pasireotide Extension19.419.417.721.025.827.425.832.325.825.829.029.030.621.017.724.219.414.514.511.33.21.6
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg Extension19.317.521.121.122.821.124.624.624.621.115.821.119.322.817.515.817.521.114.014.010.55.3
Pasireotide LAR 60 mg Extension25.925.927.829.620.429.631.524.125.924.124.120.420.420.420.420.418.511.114.87.47.45.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Mean GH < 2.5 μg/L Treated With Pasireotide LAR Alone or With Concomitant Medications Used to Treat Acromegaly (Extension Full Analysis Set)

The percentage of patients achieving mean growth hormone (GH) levels < 2.5 μg/L was calculated with two sided 95% confidence interval. All GH assessments were based on a 5-point mean growth hormone (GH) assessed from a 2-hour profile. Scheduled time points for blood sampling were pre-dose at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. Concomitant medication known to affect GH levels were allowed in patients who were not biochemically controlled after at least one year treatment with pasireotide LAR monotherapy: dopamine agonists and growth hormone receptor antagonists (Extension full analysis set) (NCT01137682)
Timeframe: Extension baseline up to approximately week 268

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 16Week 28Week 40Week 52Week 64Week 76Week 88Week 100Week 112Week 124Week 136Week 148Week 160Week 172Week 184Week 196Week 208Week 220Week 232Week 244Week 256Week 268
Control Arm (Octreotide or Lanreotide) Extension33.943.540.341.941.945.245.246.840.341.943.543.540.338.733.935.525.822.621.012.96.53.2
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg Extension38.640.438.638.640.433.340.440.436.840.436.840.438.640.433.329.831.629.824.619.315.87.0
Pasireotide LAR 60 mg Extension55.644.442.646.337.044.442.640.744.431.535.233.333.337.031.529.624.118.518.511.19.35.6

[back to top]

Summary of Pasireotide Trough Concentrations in Acromegaly Patients Following Monthly i.m. Injections of Pasireotide LAR by Incident Dose From Start of Extension Phase up to Week 196 of the Extension Phase (PK Set)

"PK samples were collected for those patients treated with pasireotide LAR in the core study and who continued on pasireotide LAR in the extension phase. PK samples were collected before the injection of pasireotide LAR only at weeks 112 and 196. PK samples were also collected at weeks 48 and 132 only for all patients treated with octreotide LAR 30 mg or lanreotide ATG 120 mg in the core study who started treatment with pasireotide LAR in the extension study.~Blood samples (2.5 mL each sample) were collected to yield 1-mL plasma for analysis of pasireotide LAR oncentration." (NCT01137682)
Timeframe: Extension baseline up to approximately 196 weeks

InterventionmL (Mean)
Week 112Week 196
Pasireotide LAR 60 mg14.0614.96

[back to top]

Summary of Pasireotide Trough Concentrations in Acromegaly Patients Following Monthly i.m. Injections of Pasireotide LAR by Incident Dose From Start of Extension Phase up to Week 196 of the Extension Phase (PK Set)

"PK samples were collected for those patients treated with pasireotide LAR in the core study and who continued on pasireotide LAR in the extension phase. PK samples were collected before the injection of pasireotide LAR only at weeks 112 and 196. PK samples were also collected at weeks 48 and 132 only for all patients treated with octreotide LAR 30 mg or lanreotide ATG 120 mg in the core study who started treatment with pasireotide LAR in the extension study.~Blood samples (2.5 mL each sample) were collected to yield 1-mL plasma for analysis of pasireotide LAR oncentration." (NCT01137682)
Timeframe: Extension baseline up to approximately 196 weeks

InterventionmL (Mean)
Week 48Week 112Week 132Week 196
Pasireotide LAR 40 mg5.708.669.2810.32

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from study entry to death from any cause. The median OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01229943)
Timeframe: From registration to time of death, assessed up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Octreotide Acetate and Everolimus)35.0
Arm II (Octreotide Acetate, Everolimus, and Bevacizumab)36.7

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression Free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from study entry until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. The median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was assessed per RECIST criteria, and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (and an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm) or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01229943)
Timeframe: From study entry to the date of documented progression or death from any cause, up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Octreotide Acetate and Everolimus)14.0
Arm II (Octreotide Acetate, Everolimus, and Bevacizumab)16.7

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

The proportion of patients who respond (completely or partially) to each combination regimen will be estimated. Response was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria: Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR) 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. (NCT01229943)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Octreotide Acetate and Everolimus)12
Arm II (Octreotide Acetate, Everolimus, and Bevacizumab)31

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) At 3 Months

"A patient was classified as CR if both biochemical parameters were controlled at the end of 3 months of treatment:~Mean 1 hour GH < 2.5µg/L (according to Central Laboratory); and~IGF-I within the Central Laboratory Normal Range (for age and gender)" (NCT01278342)
Timeframe: From Baseline to 3 months

Interventionpercent (Number)
Sandostatin LAR High Dose Alone60
Sandostatin LAR High Dose + Pegvisomat0
Sandostatin LAR High Dose + Cabergoline0

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants With Partial Response (PR) at 8 Months

"Patients who met one of the following criteria at the end of 8 months of treatment were defined as Partial Responders, regardless of the treatment.~Mean 1 hour GH > 2.5 µg/L and < 5 µg/L and either a decrease in IGF-I of at least 50% compared to baseline or IGF-I within normal range.~Mean 1 hour GH < 2.5 µg/L and a decrease in IGF-I of at least 50% compared to baseline and IGF-I outside normal range." (NCT01278342)
Timeframe: From Baseline to 8 months

Interventionpercent (Number)
Sandostatin LAR High Dose Alone25
Sandostatin LAR High Dose + Pegvisomat22.6
Sandostatin LAR High Dose + Cabergoline21.9

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at 8 Months

"A patient was classified as a Complete Responder (CR) if both biochemical parameters were controlled at the end of 8 months of treatment:~Mean 1 hour GH < 2.5µg/L (according to Central Laboratory); and~IGF-I within the Central Laboratory Normal Range (for age and gender)." (NCT01278342)
Timeframe: From Baseline to 8 months

Interventionpercent (Number)
Sandostatin LAR High Dose Alone25
Sandostatin LAR High Dose + Pegvisomat0
Sandostatin LAR High Dose + Cabergoline9.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders (Primary Medical Treatment in Arm 1, Primary Surgical Treatment in Arm 2)

Nadir growth hormone <1 ng/mL during a standard 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test using 75 g glucose and normal IGF-I according to age and gender-matched standards. (NCT01371643)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Medical Treatment by Octreotide LAR6.7
Surgical Debulking Followed by Octreotide LAR50

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders (Only Including Surgical Failures in Arm 2)

Nadir growth hormone <1 ng/mL during a standard 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test using 75 g glucose and normal IGF-I according to age and gender-matched standards. (NCT01371643)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Medical Treatment by Octreotide LAR6.7
Surgical Debulking Followed by Octreotide LAR53.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders (All Treatments)

Nadir growth hormone <1 ng/mL during a standard 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test using 75 g glucose and normal IGF-I according to age and gender-matched standards. (NCT01371643)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Medical Treatment by Octreotide LAR6.7
Surgical Debulking Followed by Octreotide LAR76.9

[back to top]

Maintenance of Response During the Extension Treatment Period

Maintenance of an insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) response during the extension treatment period was defined as the percentage of participants with an IGF-1 concentration < 1.3 times the upper limit of normal at the beginning of the extension treatment period and at the end of the extension treatment period. IGF-1 concentration was determined in serum samples taken at the same visits growth hormone concentration was assessed. (NCT01412424)
Timeframe: Beginning of the extension treatment period and the end of the extension treatment period (up to 13 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Octreotide Capsules87.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders at the End of the Core Treatment Period

A responder was defined as a participant with a serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentration < 1.3 times the upper limit of normal (adjusted for age and gender) and a growth hormone (GH) concentration < 2.5 ng/mL. The growth hormone concentration was the mean of 5 fasted GH serum concentrations collected at 30 minute intervals for 2 hours, 2 to 4 hours post-octreotide dose. IGF-1 concentration was determined in serum samples taken at the same visits GH concentration was assessed. (NCT01412424)
Timeframe: End of the core treatment period (up to 7 months)

InterventionPercentage of responders (Number)
Octreotide 40 mg86.9
Octreotide 60 mg66.7
Octreotide 80 mg40.4
Octreotide 40, 60, or 80 mg - All Participants64.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Specified IGF-1 and GH Concentrations at the Beginning and at the End of the Extension Treatment Period

Percentage of participants with the following serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH) concentrations at the beginning (BETP) and at the end (EETP) of the extension treatment period: IGF-1 < 1.3 times the upper level of normal (ULN) and GH < 5.0 ng/mL, IGF-1 < 1.3 times ULN and GH < 1.0 ng/mL, IGF-1 ≤ 1.0 times ULN and GH < 5.0 ng/mL, IGF-1 ≤ 1.0 times ULN and GH < 2.5 ng/mL, IGF-1 ≤ 1.0 times ULN and GH < 1.0 ng/mL, IGF-1 < 1.3 times ULN, IGF-1 ≤ 1.0 times ULN, GH < 5.0 ng/mL, GH < 2.5 ng/mL, GH < 1.0 ng/mL, IGF-1 ≥ 1.3 times ULN and GH < 2.5 ng/mL, IGF-1 < 1.3 times ULN and GH ≥ 2.5 ng/mL, and IGF-1 ≥ 1.3 times ULN and GH ≥ 2.5 ng/mL. The growth hormone concentration was the mean of 5 fasted GH serum concentrations collected at 30 minute intervals for 2 hours, 2 to 4 hours post-octreotide dose. IGF-1 concentration was determined in serum samples taken at the same visits GH concentration was assessed. (NCT01412424)
Timeframe: Beginning and the end of the extension treatment period (up to 6 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
IGF-1 < 1.3 & GH < 5.0: BETPIGF-1 < 1.3 & GH < 5.0: EETPIGF-1 < 1.3 & GH < 1.0: BETPIGF-1 < 1.3 & GH < 1.0: EETPIGF-1 ≤ 1.0 & GH < 5.0: BETPIGF-1 ≤ 1.0 & GH < 5.0: EETPIGF-1 ≤ 1.0 & GH < 2.5: BETPIGF-1 ≤ 1.0 & GH < 2.5: EETPIGF-1 ≤ 1.0 & GH < 1.0: BETPIGF-1 ≤ 1.0 & GH < 1.0: EETPIGF-1 < 1.3: BETPIGF-1 < 1.3: EETPIGF-1 ≤ 1.0: BETPIGF-1 ≤ 1.0: EETPGH < 5.0: BETPGH < 5.0: EETPGH < 2.5: BETPGH < 2.5: EETPGH < 1.0: BETPGH < 1.0: EETPIGF-1 ≥ 1.3 & GH < 2.5: BETPIGF-1 ≥ 1.3 & GH < 2.5: EETPIGF-1 < 1.3 & GH ≥ 2.5: BETPIGF-1 < 1.3 & GH ≥ 2.5: EETPIGF-1 ≥ 1.3 & GH ≥ 2.5: BETPIGF-1 ≥ 1.3 & GH ≥ 2.5: EETP
Octreotide Capsules84.179.569.368.248.950.048.950.042.044.384.179.548.950.0100.097.798.995.583.083.014.817.00.01.11.13.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders at the End of the Extension Treatment Period

A responder was defined as a participant with a serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentration < 1.3 times the upper limit of normal (adjusted for age and gender) and a growth hormone (GH) concentration < 2.5 ng/mL. The growth hormone concentration was the mean of 5 fasted GH serum concentrations collected at 30 minute intervals for 2 hours, 2 to 4 hours post-octreotide dose. IGF-1 concentration was determined in serum samples taken at the same visits GH concentration was assessed. (NCT01412424)
Timeframe: End of the extension treatment period (up to 13 months)

InterventionPercentage of responders (Number)
Octreotide Capsules78.4

[back to top]

Maintenance of Response During the Fixed Dose Phase of the Core Treatment Period

Maintenance of response during the fixed dose phase of the core treatment period was defined as the percentage of participants with an insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentration < 1.3 times the upper limit of normal at the beginning of the fixed dose phase of the core treatment period and at the end of the core treatment period. IGF-1 concentration was determined in serum samples taken at the same visits growth hormone concentration was assessed. (NCT01412424)
Timeframe: Beginning of the fixed dose phase of the core treatment period and the end of the core treatment period (up to 7 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Beginning of the FDP of the CTPEnd of the CTP
Octreotide Capsules82.780.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 1, 2, or 3 Acromegaly Symptoms at Baseline and at the End of the Extension Treatment Period

Reported is the percentage of participants who had ≥ 1, 2, or 3 of the 5 symptoms of acromegaly (headaches, perspiration, asthenia, swelling of extremities, or joint pain) of any severity (mild, moderate, or severe). This was a post hoc analysis. (NCT01412424)
Timeframe: Baseline and the end of the extension treatment period (up to 13 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
1 Symptom - Baseline1 Symptom - End of the extension treatment period2 Symptoms - Baseline2 Symptoms - End of the extension treatment period3 Symptoms - Baseline3 Symptoms - End of the extension treatment period
Octreotide Capsules786561434325

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improved or Maintained Acromegaly Symptoms at the End of the Extension Treatment Period

The severity (absent, mild, moderate, severe) of the 5 acromegaly symptoms headache, perspiration, asthenia, swelling of extremities, and joint pain was assessed at Baseline and at the end of the extension treatment period. The percentage of participants with improved or maintained (no change) acromegaly symptoms from Baseline at the end of the extension treatment period is reported. (NCT01412424)
Timeframe: Baseline and the end of the extension treatment period (up to 13 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
MaintainedImproved
Octreotide Capsules2757

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Specified IGF-1 and GH Concentrations at Baseline and at the End of the Core Treatment Period

Percentage of participants with the following serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH) concentrations at Baseline and at the end of the core treatment period (ECTP): IGF-1 < 1.3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) and GH < 5.0 ng/mL, IGF-1 < 1.3 times ULN and GH < 1.0 ng/mL, IGF-1 ≤ 1.0 times ULN and GH < 5.0 ng/mL, IGF-1 ≤ 1.0 times ULN and GH < 2.5 ng/mL, IGF-1 ≤ 1.0 times ULN and GH < 1.0 ng/mL, IGF-1 < 1.3 times ULN, IGF-1 ≤ 1.0 times ULN, GH < 5.0 ng/mL, GH < 2.5 ng/mL, GH < 1.0 ng/mL, IGF-1 ≥ 1.3 times ULN and GH < 2.5 ng/mL, IGF-1 < 1.3 times ULN and GH ≥ 2.5 ng/mL, and IGF-1 ≥ 1.3 times ULN and GH ≥ 2.5 ng/mL. The growth hormone concentration was the mean of 5 fasted GH serum concentrations collected at 30 minute intervals for 2 hours, 2 to 4 hours post-octreotide dose. IGF-1 concentration was determined in serum samples taken at the same visits GH concentration was assessed. (NCT01412424)
Timeframe: Baseline and the end of the core treatment period (up to 7 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
IGF-1 < 1.3 & GH < 5.0: BaselineIGF-1 < 1.3 & GH < 5.0: ECTPIGF-1 < 1.3 & GH < 1.0: BaselineIGF-1 < 1.3 & GH < 1.0: ECTPIGF-1 ≤ 1.0 & GH < 5.0: BaselineIGF-1 ≤ 1.0 & GH < 5.0: ECTPIGF-1 ≤ 1.0 & GH < 2.5: BaselineIGF-1 ≤ 1.0 & GH < 2.5: ECTPIGF-1 ≤ 1.0 & GH < 1.0: BaselineIGF-1 ≤ 1.0 & GH < 1.0: ECTPIGF-1 < 1.3: BaselineIGF-1 < 1.3: ECTPIGF-1 ≤ 1.0: BaselineIGF-1 ≤ 1.0: ECTPGH < 5.0: BaselineGH < 5.0: ECTPGH < 2.5: BaselineGH < 2.5: ECTPGH < 1.0: BaselineGH < 1.0: ECTPIGF-1 ≥ 1.3 & GH < 2.5: BaselineIGF-1 ≥ 1.3 & GH < 2.5: ECTPIGF-1 < 1.3 & GH ≥ 2.5: BaselineIGF-1 < 1.3 & GH ≥ 2.5: ECTPIGF-1 ≥ 1.3 & GH ≥ 2.5: BaselineIGF-1 ≥ 1.3 & GH ≥ 2.5: ECTP
Octreotide Capsules91.465.662.953.063.635.861.635.843.031.891.466.963.637.1100.097.496.094.766.277.57.329.82.60.71.32.0

[back to top]

Cost Effectiveness

We evaluated cost-effectiveness of combination low-dose SRL and weekly or daily pegvisomant compared to combination high-dose SRL and weekly pegvisomant by assessing cost of therapy per month in each treatment arm among patients who achieved normal IGF-1 levels. (NCT01538966)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionUS dollars/month (Mean)
High Dose SRL + Weekly Pegvisomant14,261.33
Low Dose SRL + Daily Pegvisomant22,542.86
Low Dose SRL + Weekly Pegvisomant9,836.52

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Questionnaire

"The Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) was developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) to assess quality of life in cancer patients. It includes five function domains (physical, emotional, social, role, cognitive), eight symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea, and appetite loss), as well as global health/quality-of-life and financial impact. Subjects respond on a four-point scale from not at all to very much for most items. Raw scores are linearly transformed so each score ranged a 0-100, where higher scores indicate worse symptoms (e.g., more severe/worsened) and lower scores indicate less symptoms (e.g., less severe/improvement)." (NCT01578239)
Timeframe: Inclusion (Baseline) (BL), Week 72, Week 120

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Physical functioning: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Role functioning: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Emotional functioning: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Cognitive functioning: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Social functioning: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Global Health Status/QoL: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Fatigue: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Nausea & Vomiting: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Pain: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Dyspnoea: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Insomnia: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Appetite loss: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Constipation: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Diarrhoea: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Financial difficulties: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)
Octreotide LAR-4.242-3.0306.0611.515-7.5761.515-2.020-4.545-3.0303.0306.0619.0910.000-3.0306.061

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Questionnaire

"The Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) was developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) to assess quality of life in cancer patients. It includes five function domains (physical, emotional, social, role, cognitive), eight symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea, and appetite loss), as well as global health/quality-of-life and financial impact. Subjects respond on a four-point scale from not at all to very much for most items. Raw scores are linearly transformed so each score ranged a 0-100, where higher scores indicate worse symptoms (e.g., more severe/worsened) and lower scores indicate less symptoms (e.g., less severe/improvement)." (NCT01578239)
Timeframe: Inclusion (Baseline) (BL), Week 72, Week 120

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Physical functioning: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Physical functioning: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Role functioning: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Role functioning: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Emotional functioning: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Emotional functioning: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Cognitive functioning: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Cognitive functioning: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Social functioning: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Social functioning: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Global Health Status/QoL: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Global Health Status/QoL: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Fatigue: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Fatigue: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Nausea & Vomiting: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Nausea & Vomiting: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Pain: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Pain: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Dyspnoea: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Dyspnoea: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Insomnia: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Insomnia: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Appetite loss: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Appetite loss: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Constipation: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Constipation: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Diarrhoea: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Diarrhoea: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Financial difficulties: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Financial difficulties: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)
177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate3.232-3.3335.0518.3337.74412.5005.55616.6678.5868.3335.556-16.667-7.23911.111-4.5450.000-8.5860.000-3.0300.0000.00033.333-8.0810.0000.0000.000-12.121-16.667-7.071-16.667

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Neuroendocrine Carcinoid Module (EORTC QLQ-GINET21)

The Quality of Life GI Neuroendocrine Tumor survey (QLQ GINET21) contains a total of 21 items: four single-item assessments relating to muscle and/or bone pain (MBP), body image (BI), information (INF) and sexual functioning (SX), together with 17 items organized into five proposed scales: endocrine symptoms (ED; three items), GI symptoms (GI; five items), treatment-related symptoms (TR; three items), social functioning (SF) and disease-related worries (DRW; three items). The response format of the questionnaire is a four-point Likert scale. Responses are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale using EORTC guidelines, with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. (NCT01578239)
Timeframe: Inclusion (Baseline) (BL), Week 72, Week 120

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Endocrine scale: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Endocrine scale: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)G.I. scale: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)G.I. scale: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Treatment scale: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=21,5)Treatment scale: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=1,0)Social function scale: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Social function scale: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Diseases rel. worries scale: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Diseases rel. worries scale: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Muscle/Bone pain symptom: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,10)Muscle/Bone pain symptom: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Sexual function: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=21,7)Sexual function: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Information/Communication: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Information/Communication: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)Body image: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Body image: chg from BL @ wk 120 (n=2,0)
177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate-8.7540.000-2.727-13.333-8.995-16.667-7.57611.111-6.06133.333-5.051-16.6676.34950.000-4.0400.000-4.04016.667

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Neuroendocrine Carcinoid Module (EORTC QLQ-GINET21)

The Quality of Life GI Neuroendocrine Tumor survey (QLQ GINET21) contains a total of 21 items: four single-item assessments relating to muscle and/or bone pain (MBP), body image (BI), information (INF) and sexual functioning (SX), together with 17 items organized into five proposed scales: endocrine symptoms (ED; three items), GI symptoms (GI; five items), treatment-related symptoms (TR; three items), social functioning (SF) and disease-related worries (DRW; three items). The response format of the questionnaire is a four-point Likert scale. Responses are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale using EORTC guidelines, with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. (NCT01578239)
Timeframe: Inclusion (Baseline) (BL), Week 72, Week 120

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Endocrine scale: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)G.I. scale: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Treatment scale: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=21,5)Social function scale: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Diseases rel. worries scale: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Muscle/Bone pain symptom: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,10)Sexual function: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=21,7)Information/Communication: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)Body image: chg from BL @ wk 72 (n=33,11)
Octreotide LAR-11.1112.4240.000-7.5761.010-16.66714.286-12.121-3.030

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

The distribution of adverse events was done via the analysis of frequencies for Adverse Event (AEs), Serious Adverse Event (SAEs) and Deaths, through the monitoring of relevant clinical and laboratory safety parameters. (NCT01578239)
Timeframe: From informed consent signature through study completion reached at final safety cutoff date on 18July2021, assessed up to approximately 101 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Adverse Events (AEs)Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Deaths during treatment periodDeaths during follow-up period
177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate10540466
Octreotide LAR9031563

[back to top]

Rate of Overall Survival (OS)

Survival estimates were collected every 12 Months up to 60 Months to compare OS between the two treatment groups. (NCT01578239)
Timeframe: 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months

,
InterventionPercentage of Survival Estimates (Number)
12 months24 months36 months48 months60 months
177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate91.076.061.449.537.1
Octreotide LAR79.762.750.141.835.4

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR)

The Duration of Response (DoR) was defined as the time from initially meeting the criteria for response (CR or PR) until the time of progression by RECIST 1.1. (NCT01578239)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until date of progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first until Primary Analysis cutoff date reached on 24July2015, assessed up to approximately 34 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-OctreotateNA
Octreotide LAR1.9

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Objective Response Rate (ORR) was calculated as the proportion of patients with tumour size reduction (sum of partial responses (PR) and complete responses (CR)) according to RECIST 1.1. (NCT01578239)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until date of progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first until Primary Analysis cutoff date reached on 24July2015, assessed up to approximately 34 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate14.7
Octreotide LAR4.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or the date of last contact (censored observation) prior to the date of the data cut-off, and during the entire study period (i.e. the treatment period plus follow-up). (NCT01578239)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until date of death from any cause up to final safety cut-off date reached on 18Jan2021, assessed up to approximately 100 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate48.0
Octreotide LAR36.3

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression Free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to documented centrally assessed disease progression, as evaluated by the Independent Review Committee (IRC), or death due to any cause. If a participant had no centrally assessed progression and had not died at the time of the primary endpoint analysis, the participant was regarded as censored in the context of a time to event analysis at the date of last evaluable tumor assessment. Disease progression was determined by objective tumor response status using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1). (NCT01578239)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until date of radiographic progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first until Primary Analysis cutoff date reached on 24July2015, assessed up to approximately 34 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-OctreotateNA
Octreotide LAR8.5

[back to top]

Time to Tumour Progression (TTP)

Time to Tumour Progression (TTP) was defined as the time from randomization to progression centrally assessed. It included patients who dropped out due to toxicity, but omitted patients who died without measured progression (censored to last follow-up date or death date). (NCT01578239)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until date of progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first until Primary Analysis cutoff date reached on 24July2015, assessed up to approximately 34 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-OctreotateNA
Octreotide LAR8.7

[back to top]

Need for Blood Transfusion and Hospital Admission for GI Bleed

(NCT01707225)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Octreotide LAR Depot10

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Side-Effects

"Cardiovascular:~Sinus bradycardia (19% to 25%) Hypertension (≤13%) conduction abnormalities (9% to 10%)~Central nervous system:~Fatigue (1% to 32%) headache (6% to 30%) malaise (16% to 20%) fever (16% to 20%) dizziness (5% to 20%) Pain (4% to 15%)~Dermatologic:~Pruritus (≤18%) Rash (15%; depot formulation) alopecia (≤13%)~Endocrine & metabolic:~Hyperglycemia (2% to 27%)~Gastrointestinal:~Abdominal pain (5% to 61%) loose stools (5% to 61%) nausea (5% to 61%) diarrhea (34% to 58%) flatulence (≤38%) cholelithiasis (13% to 38%; length of therapy dependent) constipation (9% to 21%) vomiting (4% to 21%)~Hematologic Anemia (5-15%)~Local:~Injection site pain (2% to 50%; dose and formulation related)~Neuromuscular & skeletal:~Back pain (1% to 27%) arthropathy (8% to 19%) myalgia (≤18%)~Renal Kidney Stones (5-15%)~Respiratory:~Upper respiratory infection (10% to 23%)~Miscellaneous:~flu symptoms (1% to 20%)" (NCT01707225)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Octreotide LAR Depot10

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Clinical Benefit

Percentage of patients with clinical benefit as judged by the investigator. Investigator attestation of continued clinical benefit was collected in clinical database after protocol amendment (release date 18 March 2016). Clinical benefit assessment before protocol amendment was done retrospectively. (NCT01789281)
Timeframe: After 3 months from enrollment, every 3 months, until end of treatment, assessed up to 7.2 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
At 3 monthsAt 6 monthsAt 9 monthsAt 12 monthsAt 15 monthsAt 18 monthsAt 21 monthsAt 24 monthsAt 27 monthsAt 30 monthsAt 33 monthsAt 36 monthsAt 39 monthsAt 42 monthsAt 45 monthsAt 48 monthsAt 51 monthsAt 54 monthsAt 57 monthsAt 60 monthsAt 63 monthsAt 66 monthsAt 69 monthsAt 72 monthsAt 75 monthsAt 78 monthsAt 81 monthsAt 84 months
Everolimus9888888653211111100000000000
Everolimus+Sandostatin LAR7777777777777666665544333210

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Any sign or symptom that occurs during the study treatment plus the 30 days post treatment. All SAEs were captured in safety database from enrollment. Safety data collection was changed in the protocol amendment released in March 2016: AEs and SAEs were captured in the clinical database from protocol amendment release (18 March 2016). Hence, SAEs from both safety database and clinical database are summarized separately. (NCT01789281)
Timeframe: SAEs collected in safety database from enrollment to end of treatment (EOT) plus 30 days, up to approximately 7.2 years. AEs/SAEs collected in clinical database from protocol amendment date 18 March 2016 to EOT plus 30 days, up to approximately 4.5 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SAEs (Safety database)Treatment-related SAEs (Safety database)AEs (Clinical Database)Tretament-related AEs (Clinical Database)SAEs (Clinical Database)Treatment-related SAEs (Clinical Database)
Everolimus617420
Everolimus+Sandostatin LAR947442

[back to top]

Compare Specificity of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT With Octreoscan

Compare specificity of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT with Octreoscan + high-resolution, contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis and staging in neuroendocrine tumors and other somatostatin receptor positive tumors (NCT01869725)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of specificity (Number)
Specificity of 68Ga-DOTATOCSpecificity of OctreoscanSpecificity of Conventional Imaging (CI)
Diagnostic (Gallium Ga 68-edotreotide PET/CT)10010047.82

[back to top]

Compare Sensitivity of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT With Octreoscan

Compare sensitivity of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT with Octreoscan + high-resolution, contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis and staging in neuroendocrine tumors and other somatostatin receptor positive tumors (NCT01869725)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

Interventionpercentage of sensitivity (Number)
Sensitivity of Ga-68-DOTATOCSensitivity of OctreoScanSensitivity of Conventional Imaging (CI)
Diagnostic (Gallium Ga 68-edotreotide PET/CT)96.5579.3182.24

[back to top]

Comparison of Conventional Imaging and Gallium Ga 68-edotreotide PET Using Concordance in Tumor Detection With Pathology

Tumor lesions detected on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT compared with tumor lesions detected on Octreoscan SPECT imaging plus high-resolution, contrast-enhanced CT. (NCT01869725)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months between the timing of the Octreoscan SPECT/CT plus high-resolution, contrast-enhanced CT and the time of the 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT (either imaging type may occur first)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sensitivity and Specificity for Ga-68-DOTATOC as Compared to Pathology72023597Sensitivity and Specificity for OctreoScan as Compared to Pathology72023597
Total positiveFalse positionFalse negativeTotal negative
Diagnostic (Gallium Ga 68-edotreotide PET/CT)28
Diagnostic (Gallium Ga 68-edotreotide PET/CT)1
Diagnostic (Gallium Ga 68-edotreotide PET/CT)23
Diagnostic (Gallium Ga 68-edotreotide PET/CT)0
Diagnostic (Gallium Ga 68-edotreotide PET/CT)6
Diagnostic (Gallium Ga 68-edotreotide PET/CT)5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Improved Frequency of Diarrhea

The frequencies of flushing, diarrhea, and carcinoid syndrome control rating (scale 1-5) will be measured and compared at week 0 and week 12 . These measurements will be compared using two-sided non-parametric paired Wilcoxon signed-rank. (NCT01886287)
Timeframe: At 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Octreotide Long-acting Release (LAR)1

[back to top]

Compared Colonic Motility Index From Fasting to Post Octreotide Infusion

"Colonic motility was measured using a solid-state catheter. The catheter had 36 sensors spaced 5-cm apart for the first 15 sensors and 1-cm apart for the remaining sensors. Pressures were transmitted to a transducer and recorded on a personal computer system (Medical Measurement Systems USA, Dover, NH).~Motility index (MI) was calculated using the Medical Measurement Systems computer program. The MI represents the area under the curve of the pressure tracing for a certain period (21). The MI was calculated for each channel. The MIs from all of the channels were then averaged to give each patient 1 average MI for the particular period under study. In this study, MI was calculated for the periods of 15, 30, and 45 minutes before and after infusion of octreotide. MI is reported as millimeters of mercury (mmHg) per 15, 30, or 45 minutes." (NCT01917773)
Timeframe: Average MI for all patients was calculated over 15-minutes, 30-minutes and 45- minutes before and after administration of octreotide.

,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
pre-octreotidepost-octreotide
15 Minutes6.035.32
30 Minutes6.896.71
45 Minutes7.737.53

[back to top]

The Number of Patients Who Achieve a Trough Human Growth Hormone (hGH) Concentration of <2.5µg/L During the Last 12 Hours of the 23 Hour Profile Following Each Study Treatment.

(NCT02217800)
Timeframe: 23 hours following each treatment

Interventionparticipants with trough hGH < 2.5 µg/mL (Number)
Saline (Control)0
920 µg DG31731
2760 µg DG31732
5520 µg DG31733
Active Control (Octreotide)4

[back to top]

Participants With Trough Human Growth Hormone < 2.5 ug/mL

(NCT02235987)
Timeframe: Pre dose and 0.33, 0.67 hours and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 hours post dose on each dosing day.

Interventionparticipants with trough hGH < 2.5 µg/mL (Number)
Baseline (Untreated Control)1
300 µg Octreotide8
100 µg DG31734
300 µg DG31736
900 µg DG31737
1800 µg DG31738

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Requiring Treatment Withdrawal in Lapatinib and Capecitabine

Proportion of subjects requiring diarrhoea related Lapatinib and Capecitabine treatment withdrawal as recorded in the eCRF (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Requiring treatment withdrawal in LapatinibRequiring treatment withdrawal in Capecitabine
No Octreotide Treatment00
Octreotide Treatment00

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Taking Anti-diarrhoeal Medication

Proportion of subjects taking anti-diarrhoeal medication as recorded in the eCRF (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Octreotide Treatment7
No Octreotide Treatment11

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Response (up to 24 Weeks)

"Clinical benefit response as measured in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.~Clinical Benefit Response rate (CBR) is defined as the percentage of subjects with a CR, PR or SD at week 24." (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Octreotide Treatment7
No Octreotide Treatment9

[back to top]

Duration of Diarrhoea of Any Grade of Severity

Duration of diarrhoea of any grade of severity, recorded as AEs in the eCRF (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

Interventiondays (Mean)
Octreotide Treatment8.7
No Octreotide Treatment36.8

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Contacting Other Non-hospital Healthcare Professionals to Discuss Diarrhoea as Recorded in the DMD

The proportion of subjects contacting a health care professional other than the hospital doctors/nurses to discuss diarrhoea are summarised (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Octreotide Treatment4
No Octreotide Treatment3

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Diarrhoea of Any Grade of Severity (up to 24 Weeks)

Proportion of subjects experiencing diarrhoea of any grade of severity as defined by the NCI CTCAE, version 4.03 and recorded as AEs in the eCRF (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Octreotide Treatment18
No Octreotide Treatment14

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Diarrhoea of Grade 3 and Above (up to 24 Weeks)

Proportion of subjects experiencing diarrhoea with a severity of Grade 3 and above, as defined by the NCI CTCAE, version 4.03 and recorded as AEs in the eCRF (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Octreotide Treatment2
No Octreotide Treatment0

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Making Dietary Changes Due to Diarrhoea as Recorded in the DMD

The proportion of subjects making dietary changes to help with the diarrhoea are summarised (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Octreotide Treatment9
No Octreotide Treatment11

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Reporting Changes in Bowel Movements From Baseline (Frequency and/or Consistency) as Recorded in the Diarrhoea Management Diary (DMD)

All subjects completed the baseline DMD during the 3 days prior to randomisation, before any study-related treatment is administered. Subjects randomised to receive Octreotide completed a second baseline DMD before starting the first cycle of treatment with Lapatinib and Capecitabine. The baseline DMD comprised of 3 questions to record stool form and consistency. The DMD to be completed throughout the rest of the study comprised of 3 questions in the baseline DMD and a further 5 questions and 6 sub-questions to evaluate the consequences and management of diarrhoea. (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Octreotide Treatment23
No Octreotide Treatment29

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Reporting Stopping Completely or Missing Doses of Anti-cancer Tablets Due to Diarrhoea as Recorded in the DMD

The proportion of subjects reducing or completely stopping the number of anti-cancer tablets to help with diarrhoea are summarised (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Octreotide Treatment2
No Octreotide Treatment3

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Taking Anti-diarrhoeal Medication as Recorded in the DMD

The proportion of subjects taking medication at least once as a result of diarrhoea are summarised (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Octreotide Treatment2
No Octreotide Treatment2

[back to top]

Time to Onset of the First Episode of Diarrhoea of Any Grade of Severity

Time to onset of the first episode of diarrhoea of any grade of severity, recorded as an AE in the eCRF. Subject are censored if there was no event. Median time and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
Octreotide TreatmentNA
No Octreotide Treatment170

[back to top]

Time to the First Subject Reported Change in Frequency and/or Consistency of Bowel Movements From Baseline as Recorded in the DMD

Event is defined as Subjects reporting change in frequency and/or consistency of bowel movements from baseline at least once in DMD. Subject are censored if there is no change in bowel movement frequency/consistency as compared to baseline. Median time and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
Octreotide Treatment22.0
No Octreotide Treatment8.0

[back to top]

Number of Lapatinib and Capecitabine Tablets Dispensed and Returned

Number of Lapatinib and Capecitabine tablets dispensed and returned as recorded in the eCRF (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

,
Interventiontablets (Mean)
Number of Lapatinib tablets dispensedNumber of Lapatinib tablets returnedNumber of Capecitabine tablets dispensedNumber of Capecitabine tablets returned
No Octreotide Treatment1115.6403.31011.2210
Octreotide Treatment1197.5477.11022.6186.1

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Diarrhoea of Grade 2 and Above (up to 24 Weeks)

Proportion of subjects experiencing at least one episode of diarrhoea with a severity of Grade 2 and above, as defined by the National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03, recorded as AEs in the Electronic case report form (eCRF) (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cyclce 1-3 (up to 9 weeks)with impuationCyclce 1-8 (up to 24 weeks)without imputation
No Octreotide Treatment95
Octreotide Treatment76

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Requiring Dose Delay in Lapatinib and Capecitabine

Proportion of subjects requiring diarrhoea related Lapatinib and Capecitabine dose delay as recorded in the eCRF (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Subjects requiring dose delay in LapatinibSubjects requiring dose delay in Capecitabine
No Octreotide Treatment22
Octreotide Treatment22

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects Requiring Dose Reduction in Lapatinib and Capecitabine

Proportion of subjects requiring diarrhoea related Lapatinib and Capecitabine dose reduction as recorded in the eCRF (NCT02294786)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Subjects requiring dose reduction in LapatinibSubjects requiring dose reduction in Capecitabine
No Octreotide Treatment02
Octreotide Treatment11

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of Octreotide After Each Injection of CAM2029 as Compared With Baseline PK for Sandostatin® Long-acting Release (LAR®) Ctrough

"Pharmacokinetics (PK) of octreotide after injection of Sandostatin Long-acting Release (LAR) was determined for the dosing period Day -28 to Day 0; Ctrough (ng/mL).~Ctrough; Concentration levels assessed prior to next injection for the final (Sandostatin LAR) dosing interval (ng/mL)." (NCT02299089)
Timeframe: Pre-dose; study Day -28- to Day 0 (PK analysis:Sandostatin (LAR®) sampling time points: 0, 1hour, 24hours, 7days, 14days, 21days and 28days)

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Sandostatin LAR 10 mg (Acromegaly)0.225
Sandostatin LAR 30mg (Acromegaly)1.20
Sandostatin LAR 20 mg (NET)0.901
Sandostatin LAR 30 mg (NET)1.27

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of Octreotide After Each Injection of CAM2029 as Compared With Baseline PK for Sandostatin® Long-acting Release (LAR®) Cmax

"Pharmacokinetics (PK) of octreotide after injection of Sandostatin Long-acting Release (LAR) was determined for the dosing period Day -28 to Day 0; Cmax (ng/mL).~Cmax (ng/mL): Maximum observed plasma concentration over the final (Sandostatin LAR) dosing interval (ng/mL)" (NCT02299089)
Timeframe: Pre-dose; study Day -28- to Day 0 (PK analysis:Sandostatin (LAR®) sampling time points: 0, 1hour, 24hours, 7days, 14days, 21days and 28days)

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Sandostatin LAR 10 mg (Acromegaly)0.349
Sandostatin LAR 30mg (Acromegaly)1.41
Sandostatin LAR 20 mg (NET)1.68
Sandostatin LAR 30 mg (NET)2.48

[back to top]

CAM2029 Effect on Growth Hormone (GH) (Acromegaly)

GH (growth hormone) levels measured on Day 84 in patients with acromegaly (NCT02299089)
Timeframe: Day 84

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
GH level < 2.5 μg/LGH level >2.5 μg/L
CAM2029 10 mg q2w (Acromegaly)21
CAM2029 20 mg q4w (Acromegaly)20

[back to top]

CAM2029 Effect on Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF-1) (Acromegaly)

"Data is presented as number of patients~Within the reference limits (see below)~Above ULN (Upper Limits of Normal)~In the Acromegaly group both males and females were included the age was between 42-70 years. The IGF normal range for the different genders and age are presented below.~REFERENCE VALUES~Males (NMOL/L) 8.34-27.44 (41-45 years) 7.7-26.36 (46-50 years) 7.3-26.34 (51-55 years) 6.64-25.44 (56-60 years) 6.17-25.02 (61-65 years) 5.96-25.48 (66-70 years)~Females (NMOL/L) 8.06-26.89 (41-45 years) 7.39-25.44 (46-50 years) 6.92-24.98 (51-55 years) 5.92-22.7 (56-60 years) 5.42-21.96 (61-65 years) 5.07-21.97 (66-70 years)" (NCT02299089)
Timeframe: Day 84

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Within Normal LimitsAbove ULN
CAM2029 10 mg q2w (Acromegaly)21
CAM2029 20 mg q4w (Acromegaly)11

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of Octreotide After Each Injection of CAM2029 as Compared With Baseline PK for Sandostatin® Long-acting Release (LAR®) AUC.

"Pharmacokinetics (PK) of octreotide after administrations of CAM2029 was determined for the dosing period Day 0 to Day 84 ; AUC0-28d (day*ng/mL).~AUC0-28d: AUC from 0 to 28 days over the dosing intervals (day*ng/mL) for CAM2029 20 mg q4w and CAM2029 10 mg q2w (to estimate AUC0-28d for those patients receiving CAM2029 10 mg q2w, AUC0-14d was multiplied by a factor of 2 as an estimate of the AUC0-28d) dosing intervals" (NCT02299089)
Timeframe: (Day 0) to Day 84 (PK analysis:CAM2029 sampling time points: CAM2029 10mg q2w; 0, 2hours, 24hours, 48hours, 7days and 14days CAM2029 20mg q4w; 0, 2hours, 24hours, 48hours, 7days, 21days and 28days)

,,,
Interventionday*ng/mL (Mean)
AUC0-28d (day*ng/mL) Day 0AUC0-28d (day*ng/mL) Day 56
CAM2029 10 mg q2w (Acromegaly)92.995.6
CAM2029 10 mg q2w (NET)72.983.3
CAM2029 20 mg q4w (Acromegaly)72.478.5
CAM2029 20 mg q4w (NET)135135

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of Octreotide After Each Injection of CAM2029 as Compared With Baseline PK for Sandostatin® Long-acting Release (LAR®) Ctrough

"Pharmacokinetics (PK) of octreotide after administrations of CAM2029 was determined for the dosing period Day 0 to Day 84; Ctrough (ng/mL).~Ctrough; Concentration levels assessed prior to next injection for CAM2029 20 mg q4w and CAM2029 10 mg q2w dosing intervals (ng/mL)" (NCT02299089)
Timeframe: (Day 0) to Day 84 (PK analysis:CAM2029 sampling time points: CAM2029 10mg q2w; 0, 2hours, 24hours, 48hours, 7days and 14days CAM2029 20mg q4w; 0, 2hours, 24hours, 48hours, 7days, 21days and 28days)

,,,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Ctrough (ng/mL) Day 0Ctrough (ng(mL) Day 56
CAM2029 10 mg q2w (Acromegaly)1.321.03
CAM2029 10 mg q2w (NET)1.801.27
CAM2029 20 mg q4w (Acromegaly)0.4031.01
CAM2029 20 mg q4w (NET)1.811.73

[back to top]

To Assess the Symptoms of Carcinoid Syndrome (Number of Bowel Movements and Flushing) and the Use of Rescue Medication Versus Baseline (by Using Patient Diaries) (NET)

"Number of bowel movements and flushing during period 0 and 1, data is presented as patients experience symptoms~Bowel movement without flushing Bowel movement and flushing No Bowel movement or Flushing" (NCT02299089)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Day 84

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bowel movements without flushingBowel movements with flushingNo Bowel movement or Flushing
CAM2029 10 mg q2w (NET)100
CAM2029 20 mg q4w (NET)022

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of Octreotide After Each Injection of CAM2029 as Compared With Baseline PK for Sandostatin® Long-acting Release (LAR®) AUC

"Pharmacokinetics (PK) of octreotide after injection of Sandostatin Long-acting Release (LAR) was determined for the dosing period Day -28 to Day 0; AUC0-28d (day*ng/mL).~AUC0-28d: AUC from 0 to 28 days over the final dosing interval (day*ng/mL) for Sandostatin LAR." (NCT02299089)
Timeframe: Pre-dose; study Day -28- to Day 0 (PK analysis:Sandostatin (LAR®) sampling time points: 0, 1hour, 24hours, 7days, 14days, 21days and 28days)

Interventionday*ng/mL (Mean)
Sandostatin LAR 10 mg (Acromegaly)6.23
Sandostatin LAR 30mg (Acromegaly)24.1
Sandostatin LAR 20 mg (NET)27.8
Sandostatin LAR 30 mg (NET)39.9

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

Safety (number of adverse events and serious adverse events) after repeated doses of CAM2029 (assessment period from Day 0 to Day 84) and single dose Sandostatin LAR (assessment period Day -28 to Day 0) (NCT02299089)
Timeframe: Day -28 to Day 84

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CAM2029 10 mg q2w (Acromegaly)2
CAM2029 20 mg q4w (Acromegaly)4
CAM2029 10 mg q2w (NET)0
CAM2029 20 mg q4w (NET)2
Sandostatin LAR (Acromegaly)4
Sandostain LAR (NET)2

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of Octreotide After Each Injection of CAM2029 as Compared With Baseline PK for Sandostatin® Long-acting Release (LAR®) Cmax.

"Pharmacokinetics (PK) of octreotide after administrations of CAM2029 was determined for the dosing period Day 0 to Day 84 ; Cmax (ng/mL).~Cmax (ng/mL): Maximum observed plasma concentration over CAM2029 20 mg q4w and CAM2029 10 mg q2w dosing intervals (ng/mL)" (NCT02299089)
Timeframe: (Day 0) to Day 84 (PK analysis:CAM2029 sampling time points: CAM2029 10mg q2w; 0, 2hours, 24hours, 48hours, 7days and 14days CAM2029 20mg q4w; 0, 2hours, 24hours, 48hours, 7days, 21days and 28days)

,,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cmax (ng/mL) Day 0Cmax (ng/mL) Day 56
CAM2029 10 mg q2w (Acromegaly)10.410.6
CAM2029 10 mg q2w (NET)6.335.61
CAM2029 20 mg q4w (Acromegaly)13.411.3
CAM2029 20 mg q4w (NET)16.315.7

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Improved Acromegaly Index of Severity (AIS) Score at the End of the Run-in Phase

"Proportion of patients with improved AIS score at the end of the Run-in phase compared to Baseline Acromegaly index of severity (AIS) at the end of Run-in phase compared to Baseline.~The Acromegaly Index of Severity (AIS) symptom score is calculated based on the presence and severity of 5 acromegaly signs/symptoms: headache, swelling of extremities, joint pain, sweating, and fatigue. Each symptom was graded from no symptoms (score 0), to mild symptoms (1), moderate (2), or severe symptoms (3)." (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Run-in Phase45

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With a Reduction in the Overall Number of Active Acromegaly Symptoms at the End of the Run-in Phase

Proportion of patients with a reduction in the overall number of active acromegaly symptoms at the end of the Run-in phase compared to Baseline (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Run-in Phase97

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who Maintain or Reduce the Overall Number of Active Acromegaly Symptoms at the End of the RCT Phase

Proportion of patients who maintain or reduce the overall number of active acromegaly symptoms at the end of the RCT phase (week 62/ EOT) , compared to week 26 (start of the RCT phase (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: 62 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RCT Phase - Oral41
RCT Phase - Injectables26

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who Maintain or Improve Their Overall Acromegaly Index of Severity (AIS) Score at the End of the RCT Phase

Proportion of patients who maintain or improve their overall Acromegaly index of severity (AIS) score at the end of the RCT phase (improvement defined as a reduction of at least one point in the AIS score), compared to week 26 (start of the RCT phase) (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: 62 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RCT Phase - Oral40
RCT Phase - Injectables25

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who Are Biochemically Controlled Throughout the RCT Phase

Proportion of patients who are biochemically controlled throughout the RCT phase. A patient was considered biochemically controlled if IGF-1 Time Weighted Average (TWA) during the RCT phase is <1.3 ULN (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: 62 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RCT Phase - Oral50
RCT Phase - Injectables37

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Reporting Interference With Daily Activities in Acro-TSQ During the RCT Phase

"Proportion of patients reporting interference with daily activities in the Acromegaly Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (Acro-TSQ) during the RCT phase.~Acro-TSQ is a validated PRO tool assessing overall convenience and satisfaction with treatment and patient perception of symptomatic control and adverse drug. It includes 6 scales: Symptom Interference, (4 items); Treatment Convenience, (6 items); Injection Site Interference (2 items); GI Interference (3 items); Treatment Satisfaction, (3 items); and Emotional Reaction (3 items). Each scale score can range from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the lowest (highest burden/lower satisfaction) and 100 representing the best possible score (lowest burden/highest satisfaction) for each of the 6 scales. Positive Acro-TSQ change scores indicate improvement while negative change scores indicate worsening." (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: 62 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RCT Phase - Oral0
RCT Phase - Injectables13

[back to top]

Change in Acromegaly Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ACRO-TSQ) Scores From Baseline to End of Run-in in Randomized Patients.

"Change in Acromegaly treatment satisfaction questionnaire (ACRO-TSQ) PRO questionnaire from baseline to end of Run-in phase in randomized patients.~Acro-TSQ is a validated PRO tool assessing overall convenience and satisfaction with treatment and patient perception of symptomatic control and adverse drug. It includes 6 scales: Symptom Interference, (4 items); Treatment Convenience, (6 items); Injection Site Interference (2 items); GI Interference (3 items); Treatment Satisfaction, (3 items); and Emotional Reaction (3 items). Each scale score can range from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the lowest (highest burden/lower satisfaction) and 100 representing the best possible score (lowest burden/highest satisfaction) for each of the 6 scales. Positive Acro-TSQ change scores indicate improvement while negative change scores indicate worsening." (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Emotional reaction - Change from baselineGI interference - Change from baselineSymptom interference- Change from baselineTreatment convenience - Change from baselineTreatment satisfaction - Change from baseline
Run-in Phase9.654.242.456.376.73

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to End of Run-in Phase in WPAI

"Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire- Run-in phase. WPAI:SHP is a standardized and validated PRO questionnaire to measure health outcomes in clinical trial settings. It measures time missed from work, impairment of work and regular activities due to overall health and symptoms, relative to measures of general health perceptions, role (physical), role (emotional), pain, symptom severity, and global measures of work and interference with regular activity.~The WPAI yields 4 types of scores: (1) absenteeism (work time missed); (2) presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); (3) work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and (4) activity impairment. Each of the 4 WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity (i.e., worse outcomes)." (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: 62 weeks

InterventionPercentage change from Run-in baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Absenteeism (%)Presenteeism (%)Work Productivity Loss (%)Activity Impairment (%)
Run-in Phase-0.81-6.65-6.92-4.94

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Reporting Injection Site Reactions in the Acro-TSQ During the RCT Phase

Proportion of patients reporting injection site reactions (ISRs). Acromegaly treatment satisfaction questionnaire (ACRO-TSQ) is a validated PRO tool assessing overall convenience and satisfaction with treatment and patient perception of symptomatic control and adverse drug. It includes 6 scales: Symptom Interference, (4 items); Treatment Convenience, (6 items); Injection Site Interference (2 items); GI Interference (3 items); Treatment Satisfaction, (3 items); and Emotional Reaction (3 items). Each scale score can range from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the lowest (highest burden/lower satisfaction) and 100 representing the best possible score (lowest burden/highest satisfaction) for each of the 6 scales. Positive ACRO-TSQ change scores indicate improvement while negative change scores indicate worsening. (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: 62 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RCT Phase - Oral0
RCT Phase - Injectables17

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients on Octreotide Capsules Who Are Biochemically Controlled at the End of the RCT Phase- Landmark Analysis

Proportion of patients on octreotide capsules who are biochemically controlled at the end of the RCT phase defined as IGF-1< 1.3 x ULN based on average of weeks 58 and 62 (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: Average of weeks 58 and 62

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RCT Phase - Oral49
RCT Phase - Injectables35

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients of Those Completing the RCT Phase Who Entered the Study Extension Phase

Proportion of patients of those completing the RCT phase (at a time octreotide capsules were not commercially available at the specific country), who entered the Study Extension phase, overall and by treatment group (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: 62 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RCT Phase - Oral34
RCT Phase - Injectables18

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Biochemically Controlled at the End of Run-in

Proportion of patients biochemically controlled at the end of the Run-in phase, defined as average IGF-1 levels during weeks 24 and 26 < 1.3xULN (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Run-in Phase94

[back to top]

EuroQol - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Scores During the Run-in Phase

"Change from baselines in EQ-5D-5L Index scores in randomized participants during the Run-in phase.~EQ-5D-5L (five severity levels EQ-5D) is a standardized instrument completed by the patient for use as a measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions. It comprises 5 dimensions of health: mobility, ability to self care, ability to undertake usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Based on qualitative and quantitative studies conducted by the EuroQol Group, there are 5 levels under each domain: 'no problems' (assigned a value of 1), 'slight problems' (assigned a value of 2), 'moderate problems' (assigned a value of 3), 'severe problems' (assigned a value of 4), and 'unable to/extreme problems' (assigned a value of 5). An EQ-5D Index score is calculated based on the responses to these 5 dimensions of health. Weights for use in the index calculation are not universally available. Higher values represent better health states." (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Run-in Phase0.0433

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Clinical and Biochemical Control at the End of the RCT Phase

"Proportion of patients with clinical and biochemical control at the end of the RCT phase. Patients were considered biochemically and clinically controlled if they met both of the following criteria:~Their IGF-1 TWA during the RCT phase was <1.3 times ULN~Their AIS score at week 62/EOT was maintained or reduced compared to week 26 (start of RCT phase)" (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: Week 62/ End of treatment; EOT

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RCT Phase - Oral36
RCT Phase - Injectables27

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to End of RCT Phase in WPAI

"Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire- RCT phase. WPAI:SHP is a standardized and validated PRO questionnaire to measure health outcomes in clinical trial settings. It measures time missed from work, impairment of work and regular activities due to overall health and symptoms, relative to measures of general health perceptions, role (physical), role (emotional), pain, symptom severity, and global measures of work and interference with regular activity.~The WPAI yields 4 types of scores: (1) absenteeism (work time missed); (2) presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness); (3) work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism); and (4) activity impairment. Each of the 4 WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity (i.e., worse outcomes)." (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

,
InterventionPercentage change from Baseline RCT (Least Squares Mean)
Absenteeism (%)Presenteeism (%)Work productivity loss (%)Activity impairment (%)
RCT Phase - Injectables0.795.986.934.34
RCT Phase - Oral-0.341.851.490.84

[back to top]

Proportion of Week 26 Responders on Octreotide Capsules Who Are Biochemically Controlled at the End of the RCT Phase- Landmark Sensitivity Analysis

Proportion of patients on Octreotide Capsules Who Are Biochemically Controlled at the End of the RCT Phase- Landmark sensitivity analysis- Week 26 responders (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: 62 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RCT Phase - Oral45
RCT Phase - Injectables34

[back to top]

Change in IGF-1 Levels in the RCT Phase

"Change in IGF-1 levels from the start of the randomized phase to the end of RCT phase.~Complete Responder (CR) is defined as IGF-1 ≤ 1 x ULN; Partial Responder (PR) is defined as 1 x ULN < IGF-1 < 1.3 x ULN, and Non-Responder (NR): IGF-1 ≥ 1.3 x ULN" (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: Change from Week 26 to week 62

Intervention"x Upper limit of normal (ULN)" (Mean)
RCT Phase - Oral-0.01
RCT Phase - Injectables-0.04

[back to top]

Change in GH Levels in the RCT Phase

Change in GH levels from the start of the randomized phase through the end of RCT phase. (NCT02685709)
Timeframe: Change from Week 26 to week 62

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
RCT Phase - Oral-0.02
RCT Phase - Injectables0.27

[back to top]

Bronchial Secretion Volume Over Preceding 24 Hour Period

Change in the rate of bronchial secretion at 24, 48, and 72 hours post-intervention initiation, as compared to the baseline rate (NCT02916433)
Timeframe: baseline, 24, 48, 72 hours

,,
InterventionmL/24 hr (Number)
Baseline24 hr time point48 hr time point72 hr time point
Octreotide #1310185120NA
Octreotide #2200185170140
Usual Care2207019525

[back to top]

Extubation Within 72 Hours

Percentage of patients who were extubated within 72 hours of intervention initiation (NCT02916433)
Timeframe: 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Usual Care0
Octreotide50

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Begin Rescue Treatment

Number of Patients who Began Rescue Treatment Prior to and Including Week 36 (NCT03252353)
Timeframe: Week 36

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Octreotide Capsules7
Placebo19

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Maintain Their Biochemical Response at the End of the Double Blind Placebo Controlled (DPC) Period.

Maintenance of response was defined by using the average IGF-1 level of the last 2 available assessments in the DPC period. If the average IGF-1 is ≤ 1×ULN, a patient was classified as a responder (i.e., maintained their biochemical response). If the average IGF-1 is > 1×ULN, a patient was classified as a non-responder. Patients who discontinue study medication during the DPC period for any reason was classified as non-responders for the primary analysis, regardless of their IGF-1 values. (NCT03252353)
Timeframe: Week 36

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Octreotide Capsules16
Matching Placebo5

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Maintain Growth Hormone (GH) Response at the End of the Double Blind Placebo Controlled Period

Maintenance of GH response was defined as having mean Growth Hormone (5 measurements 30 minutes apart) < 2.5 ng/mL at the end of the double blind placebo controlled period, out of those who were responders on Somatostatin Receptor Ligands (SRLs) injections at Screening. (NCT03252353)
Timeframe: Week 36

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Octreotide Capsules21
Placebo7

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Grade 4 or Higher Renal Adverse Event.

The percentage of patients who experience a grade 4 or higher renal adverse event. Renal adverse events were graded using CTCAE v4.0 criteria. (NCT03273712)
Timeframe: Initiation of treatment through last follow-up visit (6-9 months after last treatment), up to approximately 10-13 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
90Y-DOTA-tyr3-Octreotide0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Grade 4 or Higher Irreversible Adverse Events

The percentage of patients who experience a grade 4 or higher irreversible adverse event. Adverse events were graded using CTCAE v4.0 criteria. (NCT03273712)
Timeframe: Initiation of treatment through last follow-up visit (6-9 months after last treatment), up to approximately 10-13 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
90Y-DOTA-tyr3-Octreotide0

[back to top]

Change in Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) Between Baseline and After 2 Hour Insulin Clamp

The time required for a blood pressure wave to travel from the carotid to the femoral artery was measured in meter/sec. This is a measurement of central artery stiffness. Higher numbers indicate stiffer vessels (NCT03520569)
Timeframe: baseline and after 2 hour insulin clamp

Interventionm/sec (Mean)
Octreotide- Euglycemia5.21
Octreotide - Euglycemia- Insulin Clamp5.06
Octreotide- Hyperglycemia4.79
Octreotide- Hyperglycemia - Insulin Clamp5.07

[back to top]

Change in Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) Between Baseline and After 2 Hour Insulin Clamp

Flow mediated dilation measures the change in brachial diameter in response to 5 minutes of ischemia using B-mode ultrasound. It provides an index of nitric oxide generation by the endothelium . (NCT03520569)
Timeframe: baseline and after 2 hour insulin clamp

Intervention% change (Mean)
Octreotide- Euglycemia11.8
Octreotide - Euglycemia- Insulin Clamp11.8
Octreotide- Hyperglycemia8.9
Octreotide- Hyperglycemia - Insulin Clamp8.95

[back to top]

Change in Augmentation Index Between Baseline and After 2 Hour Insulin Clamp

The augmentation index (AIx) measured at the radial artery is a measure of systemic arterial stiffness, and is defined as the ratio of augmentation (Δ P) to central pulse pressure and expressed as percent. AIx = (ΔP/PP) x 100, where P = pressure and PP = Pulse Pressure. Higher percentages indicate increased arterial stiffness. (NCT03520569)
Timeframe: baseline and after 2 hour insulin clamp

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Octreotide- Euglycemia-4.15
Octreotide - Euglycemia- Insulin Clamp-2.23
Octreotide- Hyperglycemia-4.80
Octreotide- Hyperglycemia - Insulin Clamp-8.45

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Obstruction Clearance

"The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of eligible patients whose malignant bowel obstruction clears (de-obstruction) within 7 days of starting the protocol therapy. Patients meeting de-obstruction criteria within 7 days will be deemed treatment successes.~De-obstruction is defined as:~Effective introduction of oral intake (yes/no)~Distinguished from small volumes of oral fluid that may be allowed with unresolved MBO~Tolerating oral liquid diet (day 1 of de-obstruction) that is able to be progressively more solid (oral or enteral)~Cessation of vomiting or ability for NGT or venting G tube to remain clamped without vomiting~Rate of de-obstruction is defined as:~- From the date of study enrollment to the first observation of de-obstruction." (NCT04027348)
Timeframe: Within 7 days of starting protocol therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Octreotide, Dexamethasone, Metoclopramide)10

[back to top]