Page last updated: 2024-11-08

mometasone furoate

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Mometasone Furoate: A pregnadienediol derivative ANTI-ALLERGIC AGENT and ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENT that is used in the management of ASTHMA and ALLERGIC RHINITIS. It is also used as a topical treatment for skin disorders. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID441336
CHEMBL ID1161
CHEBI ID47564
SCHEMBL ID4568
MeSH IDM0152540

Synonyms (132)

Synonym
AC-941
smr001233233
MLS002153879
(9beta,10alpha,11alpha,14beta,16alpha,17alpha)-9,21-dichloro-11-hydroxy-16-methyl-3,20-dioxopregna-1,4-dien-17-yl furan-2-carboxylate
bdbm50148733
BRD-K60640630-001-03-7
(11beta,16alpha)-9,21-dichloro-11-hydroxy-16-methyl-3,20-dioxopregna-1,4-dien-17-yl furan-2-carboxylate
PRESTWICK_924
NCGC00016950-01
cas-83919-23-7
PRESTWICK3_000572
NCGC00179578-01
BPBIO1_000424
PRESTWICK2_000572
BSPBIO_000384
pregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione, 9,21-dichloro-17-((2-furanylcarbonyl)oxy)-11-hydroxy-16-methyl-, (11beta,16alpha)-
asmanex twisthaler
rimelon
danitin
nosorex
9,21-dichloro-11beta,17-dihydroxy-16alpha-methylpregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione 17-(2-furoate)
sch 32088
elocone
nasonex
brn 4340538
ecural
sch-32088
asmanex
flumeta
mometasone 17-furoate
9,21-dichloro-11beta-hydroxy-16alpha-methyl-3,20-dioxopregna-1,4-dien-17-yl furan-2-carboxylate
CHEBI:47564 ,
mometasone furoate
C07817
83919-23-7
MOF ,
mometasone furoate (jan/usp)
elocon (tn)
asmanex (tn)
D00690
PRESTWICK0_000572
PRESTWICK1_000572
SPBIO_002603
monovo
mometasone furoate anhydrous
nsc-760077
lyr-210
CHEMBL1161 ,
lyr210
[(8s,9r,10s,11s,13s,14s,16r,17r)-9-chloro-17-(2-chloroacetyl)-11-hydroxy-10,13,16-trimethyl-3-oxo-6,7,8,11,12,14,15,16-octahydrocyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-yl] furan-2-carboxylate
mometasone 17-(2-furoate)
nsc746171
nsc-746171
pregna-1,20-dione, 9,21-dichloro-17-[(2-furanylcarbonyl)oxy]-11-hydroxy-16-methyl-, (11.beta.,16.alpha.)-
HMS1569D06
[(8s,9r,10s,11s,13s,14s,16r,17r)-9-chloro-17-(2-chloroacetyl)-11-hydroxy-10,13,16-trimethyl-3-oxo-6,7,8,11,12,14,15,16-octahydrocyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-yl] furan-2-carboxylate;mometasone furoate
A840685
HMS2096D06
las 41002
04201gdn4r ,
ovixan
mometasone furoate [usan:usp:jan]
asmanex hfa
nsc 746171
nsc 760077
unii-04201gdn4r
elomet
sinuva
dtxcid003333
dtxsid4023333 ,
tox21_110705
HMS2235I14
AKOS015994732
NCGC00179578-04
S1987
mometasone furoate [mart.]
mometasone furoate [jan]
mometasone furoate [vandf]
mometasone furoate [mi]
mometasone furoate [orange book]
mometasone furoate [who-dd]
mometasone furoate [ep monograph]
mometasone furoate component of dulera
mometasone furoate [green book]
mometasone furoate [usan]
mometasone furoate [usp monograph]
dulera component mometasone furoate
mometasone furoate [usp-rs]
pregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione, 9,21-dichloro-17-((2-furanylcarbonyl)oxy)-11-hydroxy-16-methyl-, (11.beta.,16.alpha.)
(11.beta.,16.alpha.)-9,21-dichloro-17-((2-furanylcarbonyl)oxy)-11-hydroxy-16-methylpregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione
lyr-220 active component mometasone furoate
CCG-220572
HY-13693
(11beta,16alpha)-9,21-dichloro-17-[(2-furanylcarbonyl)oxy]-11-hydroxy-16-methylpregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione
M2354
SCHEMBL4568
tox21_110705_1
NCGC00179578-03
KS-1275
11?,16?)-9,21-dichloro-11-hydroxy-16-methyl-3,20-dioxopregna-1,4-dien-17-yl 2-furoate
Q-101380
mfcd00866003
furoate, mometasone
sch32088
sr-01000841209
SR-01000841209-2
(8s,9r,10s,11s,13s,14s,16r,17r)-9-chloro-17-(2-chloroacetyl)-11-hydroxy-10,13,16-trimethyl-3-oxo-6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17-dodecahydro-3h-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-yl furan-2-carboxylate
mometasone furoate, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
mometasone furoate, pharmaceutical secondary standard; certified reference material
mometasone furoate, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
mometasone furoate, >=98% (hplc)
HMS3713D06
mometasone fuorate
DB14512
WOFMFGQZHJDGCX-ZULDAHANSA-N
Q1044248
BRD-K60640630-001-11-0
mometasone-furoate
mometasone furoate 100 microg/ml in acetonitrile
[(9r,10s,11s,13s,16r,17r)-9-chloro-17-(2-chloroacetyl)-11-hydroxy-10,13,16-trimethyl-3-oxo-6,7,8,11,12,14,15,16-octahydrocyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-yl] furan-2-carboxylate
(1r,2r,3as,3bs,9as,9br,10s,11as)-9b-chloro-1-(2-chloroacetyl)-10-hydroxy-2,9a,11a-trimethyl-7-oxo-1h,2h,3h,3ah,3bh,4h,5h,7h,9ah,9bh,10h,11h,11ah-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-1-yl furan-2-carboxylate
EN300-19766989
mometasone furoate (usp monograph)
childrens nasonex
propel mini
mometasone furoate (usan:usp:jan)
nasonex 24hr allergy
mometasone furoate (usp-rs)
mometasone furoate (ep monograph)
propel mini sinus implant with straight delivery system
mometasone furoate (mart.)
propel contour

Research Excerpts

Overview

Mometasone furoate (MF) is an efficient glucocorticoid for topical treatment of inflammation on the skin, lung and nose. The synthetic steroid has a very high receptor affinity and a low bioavailability and shown to be superior compared to other inhaled corticosteroids.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Mometasone furoate (MF) is a synthetic glucocorticoid used clinically to treat specific inflammatory disorders including superior and inferior respiratory tract. "( Zein nanoparticles as oral carrier for mometasone furoate delivery.
Dias, S; Pinto, S; Rafacho, A; Sarmento, B; Zimath, P, 2023
)
2.62
"Mometasone furoate (MF) is an efficient glucocorticoid for topical treatment of inflammation on the skin, lung and nose."( Mometasone furoate inhibits growth of acute leukemia cells in childhood by regulating PI3K signaling pathway.
Gong, D; Shi, J; Wang, X, 2018
)
2.64
"Mometasone furoate is a potent synthetic steroid with a very high receptor affinity and a low bioavailability and shown to be superior compared to other inhaled corticosteroids."( Mometasone furoate nasal spray for the treatment of asthma.
Backer, V; Meteran, H, 2016
)
2.6
"Mometasone furoate (MMF) is a modern glucocorticoid of the 4th generation, which has been proven not only for inhalation but also for cutaneous treatment. "( Ex vivo Cutaneous Bioavailability of Topical Mometasone Furoate in an O/W Preparation.
Michael, J; Neubert, RH; Sommer, E; Wohlrab, J, 2016
)
2.14
"Mometasone furoate (Nasonex) is a high-potency intranasal corticosteroid available for the treatment and/or prophylaxis of the nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). "( Mometasone furoate: a review of its intranasal use in allergic rhinitis.
Baldwin, CM; Scott, LJ, 2008
)
3.23
"Mometasone furoate (MF) is an effective, well-tolerated inhaled steroid and is indicated for the maintenance treatment of adult and adolescent patients (> or = 12 years) with persistent asthma."( Mometasone furoate: an effective anti-inflammatory with a well-defined safety and tolerability profile in the treatment of asthma.
Bousquet, J, 2009
)
2.52
"Mometasone furoate is a topically potent glucocorticoid with a favorable risk-benefit profile."( Mometasone furoate: an inhaled glucocorticoid for the management of asthma in adults and children.
Cowie, RL; Giembycz, MA; Leigh, R, 2009
)
2.52
"Mometasone furoate (MF) is a topical glucocorticoid used for atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, and bronchial asthma. "( Dissociation of local anti-inflammatory effect and systemic effects of mometasone furoate in mice.
Kamei, C; Ogawa, M; Sakonjo, H, 2009
)
2.03
"Mometasone furoate (MF) is a new, potent synthetic inhaled corticosteroid. "( Efficacy and safety of two dry-powder inhalers for the administration of mometasone furoate in asthma patients.
Carvalho, EV; Chibante, AM; Cukier, A; Domingues, CP; Gomes, EP; Mayo, SV; Oliveira, JC; Pereira, CA; Stelmach, R; Vianna, FF,
)
1.81
"Mometasone furoate spray is a moderate potency corticosteroid that prevents influx of inflammatory cells into the mucosa."( Application of mometasone spray to reduce sore throat after tracheal intubation.
Cousnit, P; Narasethakamol, A; Saothongthong, J; Techanivate, A; Yurakate, N, 2011
)
1.09
"Mometasone furoate dry powder is an inhaled corticosteroid that is approved for once-daily treatment of asthma in both adults and children as young as 4 years."( Mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler for the treatment of asthma.
Craig, TJ; Fausnight, TB, 2011
)
2.53
"Mometasone furoate (MF) is a synthetic steroid exhibiting a strong affinity for the glucocorticoid receptor as well as a low bioavailability and a high plasma protein binding."( A review of mometasone furoate / formoterol in the treatment of asthma.
Backer, V; Porsbjerg, C; Westergaard, CG, 2013
)
1.48
"Mometasone furoate (MF) is a synthetic glucocorticoid. "( Degradation kinetics of mometasone furoate in aqueous systems.
Cutler, DC; Davies, NM; Teng, XW, 2003
)
2.07
"Mometasone furoate (MF) is a potent glucocorticoid developed for the treatment of glucocorticoid-responsive inflammatory disorders. "( Kinetics of metabolism and degradation of mometasone furoate in rat biological fluids and tissues.
Cutler, DJ; Davies, NM; Teng, XW, 2003
)
2.03
"Mometasone furoate (MF) is a topically used glucocorticoid with high anti-inflammatory potency. "( Human receptor kinetics, tissue binding affinity, and stability of mometasone furoate.
Elert, O; Högger, P; Neukam, K; Valotis, A, 2004
)
2
"Mometasone furoate (MF) is a synthetic glucocorticoid with anti-inflammatory activity, which is used for the treatment of topical skin disorders, allergic rhinitis and treatment of mild to moderate persistent asthma. "( Characterization of degradation products of mometasone furoate.
Hochhaus, G; Horváth, G; Issar, M; Sahasranaman, S; Tóth, G, 2004
)
2.03
"Mometasone furoate microemulsion is a safe and effective therapy in the treatment of symptomatic erosive-ulcerative OLP."( Efficacy of mometasone furoate microemulsion in the treatment of erosive-ulcerative oral lichen planus: pilot study.
Aguirre, JM; Bagán, JV; Díaz de Rojas, F; Jimenez, Y; Martínez-Conde, R; Ponte, A; Rodriguez, C, 2004
)
2.15
"Mometasone furoate (MF) is a highly potent glucocorticoid used topically to treat inflammation in the lung, nose and on the skin. "( Significant receptor affinities of metabolites and a degradation product of mometasone furoate.
Högger, P; Valotis, A, 2004
)
2
"Mometasone furoate is a potent glucocorticoid anti-inflammatory agent. "( Solid state characterization of mometasone furoate anhydrous and monohydrate forms.
Bradley, P; Carillo, M; Chen, XS; Curtis Haltiwanger, R, 2005
)
2.05
"Mometasone furoate is a newer corticoid that has high potency but low systemic toxicity."( Comparative potency of formulations of mometasone furoate in terms of inhibition of 'PIRHR' in the forearm skin of normal human subjects measured with laser doppler velocimetry.
Chevli, T; Karnik, R; Kulhalli, P; Mulgaonkar, N; Sheth, M,
)
1.12
"Mometasone furoate NS is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for bilateral nasal polyposis in adults, reducing nasal polyp size and symptoms of nasal congestion and/or obstruction."( A randomized controlled trial of mometasone furoate nasal spray for the treatment of nasal polyposis.
Bellussi, L; Danzig, M; Jorissen, M; Mösges, R; Passàli, D; Staudinger, H; Stjärne, P, 2006
)
2.06
"Mometasone furoate is a new corticosteroid, synthesized to have an improved ratio of anti-inflammatory potential to adverse effects. "( Sensitization studies with mometasone furoate, tixocortol pivalate, and budesonide in the guinea pig.
Bjorkner, B; Bruze, M; Dooms-Goossens, A, 1996
)
2.03
"Mometasone furoate (MF) is a new strongly lipophilic steroid which has an anti-inflammatory effect as evaluated by in vivo and in vitro studies."( Inhibition of elicitation of contact dermatitis in humans by mometasone furoate: evaluation by means of 20-MHz B scanning associated with image analysis.
Bianchi, B; Di Nardo, A; Giusti, G; Mantovani, L; Seidenari, S, 1997
)
1.98
"Mometasone furoate (MF) is a newly synthesized glucocorticoid with the advantage of increasing efficacy and reducing the number of adverse effects."( Effects of mometasone furoate on human keratinocytes and fibroblasts in vitro.
Bosserhoff, A; Hein, R; Kurzidym, U; Landthaler, M; Nowok, K; Wach, F,
)
1.24
"Mometasone furoate is a synthetic corticosteroid which has been evaluated for intranasal use in the treatment of adults and children with allergic rhinitis. "( Mometasone furoate. A review of its intranasal use in allergic rhinitis.
Lamb, HM; Onrust, SV, 1998
)
3.19
"Mometasone furoate is a well tolerated intranasal corticosteroid with minimal systemic activity and an onset of action of < or = 7 hours. "( Mometasone furoate. A review of its intranasal use in allergic rhinitis.
Lamb, HM; Onrust, SV, 1998
)
3.19
"Mometasone furoate is a potent glucocorticoid that can markedly inhibit proinflammatory Th2 cytokines in vitro. "( Effect of mometasone furoate on early and late phase inflammation in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Chavarria, V; Cosachov, J; Dellevecchia, D; Etzel, J; Frieri, M; Kumar, NS; Mesarina-Wicki, B; Nolop, KB; Sansone, G; Therattil, J; Wang, SF; Zitt, M, 1998
)
2.15
"Mometasone furoate (MF) is a new potent corticosteroid for use in treating asthma."( Mometasone furoate antagonizes AMP-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with mild asthma.
Arshad, H; Harrison, JE; Holgate, ST; Stryszak, P, 2000
)
3.19
"Mometasone furoate (MF) is a new inhaled glucocorticoid administered by dry powder inhaler (DPI)."( Mometasone furoate: efficacy and safety in moderate asthma compared with beclomethasone dipropionate.
Ahmed, T; Graft, DF; Harrison, JE; Lawrence, M; Nathan, RA; Nayak, AS; Nolop, KB; Picone, FJ; Vanderwalker, ML; Wolfe, J, 2001
)
3.2
"Mometasone furoate is a corticosteroid with relatively high in vitro potency. "( Inhaled mometasone furoate: a review of its use in adults and adolescents with persistent asthma.
Jarvis, B; Sharpe, M, 2001
)
2.19
"Mometasone furoate (SCH 32088) is a synthetic corticosteroid which has a topical anti-inflammatory activity with a minimal potential for suppressing hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis. "( A competitive enzyme immunoassay for the direct determination of mometasone furoate (SCH 32088) in human plasma.
Byrnes, K; Lin, CC; Tian, Z; Wang, CJ, 1992
)
1.96
"Mometasone furoate (Elocon) is a newly formulated and unique medium-potency synthetic 17-heterocyclic corticosteroid. "( Mometasone furoate ointment and cream 0.1 percent in treatment of psoriasis: comparison with ointment and cream formulations of fluocinolone acetonide 0.025 percent and triamcinolone acetonide 0.1 percent.
Bressinck, R; Cole, GW; Deeken, JH; Ellis, CN; Guin, JD; Herndon, JH; Lasser, AE; Leibsohn, E; Medansky, RS; Menter, MA, 1988
)
3.16

Effects

Mometasone furoate has been available for clinical use, starting with a dermatologic preparation, for nearly 20 years. It also has strong anti-inflammatory activity, with IL-4 and IL-5 inhibition activities equivalent to those of fluticasone propionate.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Mometasone furoate has been available for clinical use, starting with a dermatologic preparation, for nearly 20 years. "( Mometasone furoate: an inhaled glucocorticoid for the management of asthma in adults and children.
Cowie, RL; Giembycz, MA; Leigh, R, 2009
)
3.24
"Mometasone furoate also has strong anti-inflammatory activity, with IL-4 and IL-5 inhibition activities equivalent to those of fluticasone propionate."( A review of the preclinical and clinical data of newer intranasal steroids used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.
Lumry, WR, 1999
)
1.02
"Mometasone furoate (MF), has recently been developed for the treatment of asthma and inhibits key anti-inflammatory processes with a potency equal to or greater than that of fluticasone propionate."( Review of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of action of glucocorticoids for use in asthma.
Johnston, SL; Schleimer, RP; Umland, SP, 2002
)
1.04

Treatment

Mometasone furoate nasal spray treated subjects also showed a significant reduction in TNNSS (-0.30; 95% CI: - 0.43 to -0.18). Both mometas one furoATE NS treatment regimens were more effective than loratadine or placebo for TNSS (P < .01 for both) and TSS.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Mometasone furoate nasal spray treated subjects also showed a significant reduction in TNNSS (-0.30; 95% CI: -0.43 to -0.18)."( Efficacy of mometasone furoate nasal spray in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trials.
Baena-Cagnani, CE; Canonica, GW; Compalati, E; Passalacqua, G; Penagos, M; Tarantini, F, 2008
)
1.45
"Both mometasone furoate NS treatment regimens were more effective than loratadine or placebo for TNSS (P < .01 for both) and TSS (P < or = .03 for both), whereas loratadine was more effective than placebo for TNSS only (P = .02)."( Clinical benefits of combination treatment with mometasone furoate nasal spray and loratadine vs monotherapy with mometasone furoate in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Anolik, R, 2008
)
1.06
"Treatment with mometasone furoate or tacrolimus does not affect short-term growth in children with mild to moderate atopic eczema."( Short-term growth in children with eczema during treatment with topical mometasone furoate and tacrolimus.
Gradman, J; Wolthers, OD, 2007
)
0.92

Toxicity

Intranasal mometasone furoate (MF) has been extensively studied in adults. It has been found to be safe and effective therapy for the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Eighteen percent of patients using mometasone reported adverse reactions but all were of limited duration and did not persist despite continued application of the drug."( Safety and efficacy of mometasone furoate cream in the treatment of steroid responsive dermatoses.
Cains, GD; Gilmore, SJ; Kelly, JW; Rallings, M, 1991
)
0.59
" MFNS was also found to be well tolerated by both the younger and older children, with headache the most frequently reported adverse event in both the placebo- and MFNS-treated groups."( Safety and tolerability of once-daily mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray in children.
Affrime, MB; Brannan, MD; Herron, JM,
)
0.4
"Mometasone furoate fatty cream is effective and safe both for treatment and as a prophylaxis in patients with atopic dermatitis."( An open study of efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with mometasone furoate fatty cream in the treatment of adult patients with atopic dermatitis.
Christensen, O; Edmar, B; Faergemann, J; Hersle, K; Johnsson, A; Nordin, P; Sjövall, P; Svensson, A, 2000
)
1.99
"Intranasal mometasone furoate (MF) has been extensively studied in adults and has been found to be safe and effective therapy for the treatment of allergic rhinitis."( Safety and efficacy of mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray in children with allergic rhinitis: results of recent clinical trials.
Dibildox, J, 2001
)
1.01
" Loratadine did not show beneficial effect when combined with good topical corticosteroid but it was safe and had no serious side effect on the children."( Therapeutic efficacy and safety of loratadine syrup in childhood atopic dermatitis treated with mometasone furoate 0.1 per cent cream.
Chunharas, A; Viravan, S; Wananukul, S; Wisuthsarewong, W, 2002
)
0.53
" All treatments were generally safe and well tolerated, with adverse events of mild to moderate severity."( Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate administered once-daily in the evening in patients with persistent asthma dependent on inhaled corticosteroids.
Boulet, LP; Busse, WW; D'Urzo, A; Karpel, JP; Lutsky, B; Monahan, ME; Staudinger, H, 2005
)
0.64
"MFNS 200 mug, once or twice daily, was safe and significantly superior to placebo in reducing polyp grade (size and extent) and improving congestion/obstruction and return of sense of smell."( Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray in nasal polyposis.
Damiano, A; Danzig, M; Hernandez, J; Reyes, A; Schenkel, E; Small, CB; Staudinger, H; Stryszak, P, 2005
)
0.64
" Safety assessments included disease recurrence during follow-up and adverse event monitoring."( Treating acute rhinosinusitis: comparing efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray, amoxicillin, and placebo.
Bachert, C; Meltzer, EO; Staudinger, H, 2005
)
0.57
" All treatments were well tolerated with a similar incidence of adverse events."( Treating acute rhinosinusitis: comparing efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray, amoxicillin, and placebo.
Bachert, C; Meltzer, EO; Staudinger, H, 2005
)
0.57
" MFNS was well tolerated, with no unusual or unexpected adverse events."( The efficacy and safety of once-daily mometasone furoate nasal spray in nasal polyposis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Blomgren, K; Cayé-Thomasen, P; Salo, S; Stjärne, P; Søderstrøm, T, 2006
)
0.6
" Diary cards recording symptoms, use of medication, and adverse events were kept by the patients."( Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate vs nedocromil sodium as prophylactic treatment for moderate/severe seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Baibas, N; Garris, V; Kompoti, E; Kontou-Fili, K; Manoussakis, E; Papadopoulos, D; Papadopoulos, NG; Petalas, K; Pitsios, C; Saxoni-Papageorgiou, P; Tassios, I, 2006
)
0.64
" No serious adverse event was recorded, and there was no difference between the treatments in any adverse event."( Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate vs nedocromil sodium as prophylactic treatment for moderate/severe seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Baibas, N; Garris, V; Kompoti, E; Kontou-Fili, K; Manoussakis, E; Papadopoulos, D; Papadopoulos, NG; Petalas, K; Pitsios, C; Saxoni-Papageorgiou, P; Tassios, I, 2006
)
0.64
"Prophylactic administration of mometasone furoate before the pollen season is safe and may lead to improved control of SAR compared with the use of nedocromil sodium."( Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate vs nedocromil sodium as prophylactic treatment for moderate/severe seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Baibas, N; Garris, V; Kompoti, E; Kontou-Fili, K; Manoussakis, E; Papadopoulos, D; Papadopoulos, NG; Petalas, K; Pitsios, C; Saxoni-Papageorgiou, P; Tassios, I, 2006
)
0.93
"The development of corticosteroids that are delivered directly to the nasal mucosa has alleviated much of the concern about the systemic adverse effects associated with oral corticosteroid therapy."( Mometasone furoate nasal spray: a review of safety and systemic effects.
Hubbell, J; Kosoglou, T; Zitt, M, 2007
)
1.78
" Searches were also conducted to identify articles on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and adverse effects of the intranasal corticosteroids discussed in this article."( Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of mometasone furoate nasal spray: potential effects on clinical safety and efficacy.
Hochhaus, G, 2008
)
0.61
"The data reviewed indicate that MFNS has a number of qualities that are important in achieving nasal selectivity with minimal systemic adverse effects."( Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of mometasone furoate nasal spray: potential effects on clinical safety and efficacy.
Hochhaus, G, 2008
)
0.61
"MFNS is an intranasal corticosteroid with a low potential for systemic adverse effects."( Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of mometasone furoate nasal spray: potential effects on clinical safety and efficacy.
Hochhaus, G, 2008
)
0.61
" However, the adverse event (AE) profiles of oral glucocorticoids, which result largely from the systemic absorption of those agents, have engendered concerns about the safety of INSs."( Safety of intranasal corticosteroids in acute rhinosinusitis.
Demoly, P,
)
0.13
" A total of 94% and 100% of MFNS and BDP subjects, respectively, reported adverse events (AEs), which were mostly mild or moderate."( Mometasone furoate nasal spray is safe and effective for 1-year treatment of children with perennial allergic rhinitis.
Meltzer, EO; Ratner, PH; Teper, A, 2009
)
1.8
" The primary safety variable was the incidence of adverse events."( Long-term safety of mometasone furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler in children: Results of an open-label study comparing mometasone furoate with beclomethasone dipropionate in children with persistent asthma.
Corren, J; Leflein, J; Noonan, M; Staudinger, H, 2009
)
0.68
"The incidence of adverse events was similar in all 3 treatment groups."( Long-term safety of mometasone furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler in children: Results of an open-label study comparing mometasone furoate with beclomethasone dipropionate in children with persistent asthma.
Corren, J; Leflein, J; Noonan, M; Staudinger, H, 2009
)
0.68
"Both MF-DPI doses were well tolerated, with no unusual or unexpected adverse events or safety concerns, and had a similar adverse event profile to that of BDP-MDI 168 microg BID."( Long-term safety of mometasone furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler in children: Results of an open-label study comparing mometasone furoate with beclomethasone dipropionate in children with persistent asthma.
Corren, J; Leflein, J; Noonan, M; Staudinger, H, 2009
)
0.68
" The safety of MF-DPI treatment was evaluated by measuring adverse events (AEs) and laboratory tests."( Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of mometasone furoate in adult Japanese patients with mild asthma: open-label clinical trial findings.
Miyamoto, T; Tohda, Y, 2010
)
0.63
" An understanding of structure-activity relationships (SARs) of chemicals can make a significant contribution to the identification of potential toxic effects early in the drug development process and aid in avoiding such problems."( Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
Fisk, L; Greene, N; Naven, RT; Note, RR; Patel, ML; Pelletier, DJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout."( Efficacy and long-term safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray in children with perennial allergic rhinitis.
Baena-Cagnani, CE; Patel, P, 2010
)
0.64
" MF/F was safe and provided rapid and sustained bronchodilation in patients with asthma."( Twenty-six-week efficacy and safety study of mometasone furoate/formoterol 200/10 microg combination treatment in patients with persistent asthma previously receiving medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids.
Nathan, RA; Nolte, H; Pearlman, DS,
)
0.39
" Effects of MF/F on asthma control and symptoms were evaluated and adverse events recorded."( Twelve-week efficacy and safety study of mometasone furoate/formoterol 200/10 microg and 400/10 microg combination treatments in patients with persistent asthma previously receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids.
Corren, J; Murphy, K; Nolte, H; Weinstein, SF; White, M,
)
0.4
" Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events toxicity was greater in the placebo group (p = ."( Mometasone furoate effect on acute skin toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a phase III double-blind, randomized trial from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N06C4.
Anders, JC; Atherton, PJ; Bearden, JD; Deming, RL; Griffin, PC; Haselow, RE; Loprinzi, CL; Martenson, JA; Miller, RC; Schaefer, PL; Schwartz, DJ; Sloan, JA; Stoffel, TJ, 2011
)
1.81
"The use of the single-dose inhaler developed in Brazil for MF administration is as effective and safe as is that of a standard inhaler in the treatment of patients with asthma."( Efficacy and safety of two dry-powder inhalers for the administration of mometasone furoate in asthma patients.
Carvalho, EV; Chibante, AM; Cukier, A; Domingues, CP; Gomes, EP; Mayo, SV; Oliveira, JC; Pereira, CA; Stelmach, R; Vianna, FF,
)
0.36
" The primary endpoint was the number and percentage of patients reporting any adverse event (AE)."( Long-term safety of mometasone furoate/formoterol combination for treatment of patients with persistent asthma.
Chérrez-Ojeda, I; Maspero, JF; Nolte, H, 2010
)
0.68
"One-year treatment with the new combination therapies - twice-daily MF/F-MDI 200/10 and 400/10 μg - is safe and well tolerated in patients with persistent asthma."( Long-term safety of mometasone furoate/formoterol combination for treatment of patients with persistent asthma.
Chérrez-Ojeda, I; Maspero, JF; Nolte, H, 2010
)
0.68
" placebo to prevent radiation dermatitis, the primary provider-assessed (PA) endpoint, using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), was negative."( Comparison of provider-assessed and patient-reported outcome measures of acute skin toxicity during a Phase III trial of mometasone cream versus placebo during breast radiotherapy: the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (N06C4).
Anders, JC; Atherton, PJ; Burger, KN; Deming, RL; Griffin, PC; Loprinzi, CL; Martenson, JA; Miller, RC; Neben-Wittich, MA; Schwartz, DJ; Sloan, JA, 2011
)
0.37
" MFNS offers an effective and safe treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis."( Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.
Bachert, C; Hauswald, B; Hörmann, K; Klimek, L; Mösges, R; Rasp, G; Rudack, C; Spaeth, J; Vent, J, 2011
)
0.68
"Historically, skin toxicity has been assessed in prospective clinical trials using the clinician-reported National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)."( Using the Skindex-16 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to assess rash symptoms: results of a pooled-analysis (N0993).
Atherton, PJ; Burger, KN; Jatoi, A; Loprinzi, CL; Miller, RC; Neben Wittich, MA; Sloan, JA, 2012
)
0.38
" Statistical procedures, including Pearson correlations, were utilized to determine relationships between adverse event (AE) grades and Skindex-16 scores."( Using the Skindex-16 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to assess rash symptoms: results of a pooled-analysis (N0993).
Atherton, PJ; Burger, KN; Jatoi, A; Loprinzi, CL; Miller, RC; Neben Wittich, MA; Sloan, JA, 2012
)
0.38
" Recent studies, which evaluated topical and systemic adverse events associated with ciclesonide (CIC), fluticasone furoate (FF), mometasone furoate (MF), triamcinolone acetonide, fluticasone propionate, budesonide, and beclomethasone dipropionate were summarized."( Safety update regarding intranasal corticosteroids for the treatment of allergic rhinitis.
Blaiss, MS,
)
0.34
" No device-related adverse events occurred."( Safety and efficacy of a novel bioabsorbable, steroid-eluting sinus stent.
Bhattacharyya, N; Hwang, PH; Lanier, BJ; Mugglin, AS; Murr, AH; Smith, TL; Stambaugh, JW,
)
0.13
" Similar proportions of subjects in all five treatment groups reported treatment-emergent adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination of mometasone furoate and formoterol fumarate in subjects with moderate to very severe COPD: results from a 52-week Phase III trial.
Banerjee, S; Doherty, DE; Kerwin, E; Knorr, B; Matiz-Bueno, CE; Shekar, T; Staudinger, H; Tashkin, DP, 2012
)
0.63
" The incidence of adverse events was similar in the active-treated and placebo-treated subjects across 26 weeks of treatment."( Efficacy and safety characteristics of mometasone furoate/formoterol fumarate fixed-dose combination in subjects with moderate to very severe COPD: findings from pooled analysis of two randomized, 52-week placebo-controlled trials.
Doherty, DE; Gates, D; Kerwin, E; Knorr, B; Matiz-Bueno, CE; Shekar, T; Staudinger, H; Tashkin, DP, 2012
)
0.65
" Safety was monitored by physical examination, laboratory investigation and documentation of clinical adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of 15(R/S)-methyl-lipoxin A(4) in topical treatment of infantile eczema.
Chen, XQ; Dong, L; Liu, B; Wu, HJ; Wu, SH, 2013
)
0.39
" No clinical adverse event was found in the three patient groups."( Efficacy and safety of 15(R/S)-methyl-lipoxin A(4) in topical treatment of infantile eczema.
Chen, XQ; Dong, L; Liu, B; Wu, HJ; Wu, SH, 2013
)
0.39
" End-points included change in 24-h urinary free cortisol (primary), change in 24-h urinary free cortisol corrected for creatinine (key secondary), and adverse events."( Safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray in the treatment of nasal polyps in children.
Chur, V; Small, CB; Stryszak, P; Teper, A, 2013
)
0.79
" For the treatment-related adverse effects (AEs), treatment-related severe AEs, discontinuations due to AEs and some common symptom of AEs, MF was all similar to other ICSs in their incidence."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate to other inhaled steroids for asthma: a meta-analysis.
Bunjhoo, H; Wang, J; Xiong, W; Xu, Y; Yang, D; Zhao, J, 2013
)
0.66
"1% MMF ointment for 12 weeks on a tapering regimen was found to be an effective and safe therapy option in the ATP of VLS and could represent an alternative first-line treatment to an ultra-potent molecule."( Mometasone fuoroate 0.1% ointment in the treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus: a study of efficacy and safety on a large cohort of patients.
Borghi, A; Corazza, M; Minghetti, S; Virgili, A, 2014
)
0.4
"No patient experienced any adverse effect during the study."( Efficacy and safety of erdosteine in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis - a pilot study.
Hoza, J; Kellnerova, R; Salzman, R; Schalek, P; Starek, I, 2013
)
0.39
" Safety and tolerability included evaluation by adverse events (AEs), physical (including nasal) examinations, vital signs assessments, laboratory evaluations, and change in concomitant medications."( Comparative safety and efficacy of two formulations of mometasone nasal spray in adult seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Jones, S; Kreft, KZ; Kuna, P; Wasiak, W,
)
0.13
" Physicians evaluated the drug as 'Good' in 72% and 'Excellent' in 28% of subjects; adverse events were reported in 27."( The Efficacy and Safety of Eberconazole Nitrate 1% and Mometasone Furoate 0.1% w/w Cream in Subjects with Inflamed Cutaneous Mycoses.
Carol, F; Gnaneshwar, R; Jerajani, HR; Krishnankutty, B; Kumar, AS; Kuruvila, M; Latha, MS; Martis, J, 2015
)
0.66
" It offers an effective and safe therapeutic option for the management of ICM."( The Efficacy and Safety of Eberconazole Nitrate 1% and Mometasone Furoate 0.1% w/w Cream in Subjects with Inflamed Cutaneous Mycoses.
Carol, F; Gnaneshwar, R; Jerajani, HR; Krishnankutty, B; Kumar, AS; Kuruvila, M; Latha, MS; Martis, J, 2015
)
0.66
"Topical steroids are known for their anti-inflammatory properties and are commonly prescribed to treat many adverse skin conditions such as eczema and psoriasis."( Longitudinal in vivo tracking of adverse effects following topical steroid treatment.
Arp, Z; Boppart, SA; Bower, AJ; Chaney, EJ; Hughes-Earle, A; Li, J; Marjanovic, M; Zhao, Y, 2016
)
0.43
"Derivatives of hydrocortisone, such as mometasone furoate, a (2') furoate-17 ester with chlorine substitutions at positions 9 and 21, have been designed to improve efficacy and reduce the incidence of adverse effects."( Comparative safety and efficacy of topical mometasone furoate with other topical corticosteroids.
Barnes, TM; Greive, KA; Spada, F, 2018
)
1.01
" No adverse events of treatment with modafinil and intranasal mometasone furoate were reported."( Comparison of the Efficacy, Side Effects, and Cost of Modafinil and Intranasal Mometasone Furoate in Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome: A Preliminary Clinical Study.
Duan, Z; Fu, J; Zhang, S, 2018
)
0.95
" The primary endpoint was product-related serious adverse events (SAEs) at 4 weeks."( Phase 1 clinical study to assess the safety of a novel drug delivery system providing long-term topical steroid therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis.
Cervin, A; Douglas, RG; Kuang, Y; Kuruvilla, T; Psaltis, AJ; Rimmer, J, 2019
)
0.51
"LYR-210 is safe and well-tolerated in ESS-naive CRS patients and leads to sustained symptom improvement in patients."( Phase 1 clinical study to assess the safety of a novel drug delivery system providing long-term topical steroid therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis.
Cervin, A; Douglas, RG; Kuang, Y; Kuruvilla, T; Psaltis, AJ; Rimmer, J, 2019
)
0.51
" Additional assessments included average morning and evening 12-hour instantaneous TNSS (iTNSS), ocular symptoms, individual symptoms, onset of action, quality of life, and adverse events (AEs)."( Efficacy and safety of olopatadine-mometasone combination nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Amar, NJ; Berman, G; Caracta, CF; Gross, GN; Tantry, SK, 2019
)
0.51
" Average morning and evening 12-hour instantaneous TNSS (iTNSS), ocular symptoms, individual symptoms, onset of action, quality of life, and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed."( Efficacy and safety of twice-daily and once-daily olopatadine-mometasone combination nasal spray for seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Andrews, CP; Mohar, D; Salhi, Y; Tantry, SK, 2020
)
0.56
" Overall, approximately 50% of participants experienced one or more treatment-emergent adverse events, with fewer occurring in the MF/F group."( A phase 3 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a pediatric dose of mometasone furoate with and without formoterol for persistent asthma.
Amar, NJ; Gates, D; Jain, N; Mok, W; Varnell, T; Vermeulen, JH; Weinstein, CLJ; Zhang, X, 2020
)
0.79
" Secondary end points included change from baseline to week 24 in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) score, University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, sense of smell, postnasal drip, runny nose, and adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in nasal polyposis: 2 randomized phase 3 trials.
Bachert, C; Corren, J; Gevaert, P; Han, J; Howard, M; Islam, L; Kaufman, D; Lee, SE; Ligueros-Saylan, M; Mullol, J; Omachi, TA; Owen, R; Wong, K; Zhu, R, 2020
)
0.56
" Adverse events were similar between groups."( Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in nasal polyposis: 2 randomized phase 3 trials.
Bachert, C; Corren, J; Gevaert, P; Han, J; Howard, M; Islam, L; Kaufman, D; Lee, SE; Ligueros-Saylan, M; Mullol, J; Omachi, TA; Owen, R; Wong, K; Zhu, R, 2020
)
0.56
" The objective of this study is to describe adverse events related to CESs."( Adverse Events Associated With Corticosteroid-Eluting Sinus Stents: A MAUDE Database Analysis.
Kasle, DA; Lerner, MZ; Manes, RP; Narwani, V; Patel, RA; Torabi, SJ, 2022
)
0.72
"The MAUDE database was queried for reports of adverse events involving the use of CESs approved by the Food and Drug Administration, including Propel, Propel Mini, Propel Contour, and Sinuva (Intersect ENT)."( Adverse Events Associated With Corticosteroid-Eluting Sinus Stents: A MAUDE Database Analysis.
Kasle, DA; Lerner, MZ; Manes, RP; Narwani, V; Patel, RA; Torabi, SJ, 2022
)
0.72
"There were 28 reported adverse events in total, with all events being related to the Propel family of stents and none related to Sinuva stents."( Adverse Events Associated With Corticosteroid-Eluting Sinus Stents: A MAUDE Database Analysis.
Kasle, DA; Lerner, MZ; Manes, RP; Narwani, V; Patel, RA; Torabi, SJ, 2022
)
0.72
"The most commonly reported adverse events were postoperative infection, including multiple cases of fungal infection, followed by migration of the stent."( Adverse Events Associated With Corticosteroid-Eluting Sinus Stents: A MAUDE Database Analysis.
Kasle, DA; Lerner, MZ; Manes, RP; Narwani, V; Patel, RA; Torabi, SJ, 2022
)
0.72
" However, an increase in serious adverse events with the use of both regular formoterol and regular salmeterol (long-acting beta₂-agonists) compared with placebo for chronic asthma has been demonstrated in previous Cochrane Reviews."( Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; O'Shea, O; Stovold, E, 2021
)
0.62
"To assess risks of mortality and non-fatal serious adverse events in trials that have randomised patients with chronic asthma to regular formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid."( Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; O'Shea, O; Stovold, E, 2021
)
0.62
" We sought unpublished data on mortality and serious adverse events from study sponsors and authors."( Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; O'Shea, O; Stovold, E, 2021
)
0.62
" In all, 201 adults reported non-fatal serious adverse events."( Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; O'Shea, O; Stovold, E, 2021
)
0.62
" Evidence on all-cause non-fatal serious adverse events indicates that there is probably little to no difference between formoterol/budesonide and salmeterol/fluticasone inhalers."( Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.
Cates, CJ; O'Shea, O; Stovold, E, 2021
)
0.62
" Average morning and evening 12-h reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS), instantaneous total nasal symptom score (iTNSS), reflective total ocular symptom score (rTOSS), instantaneous total ocular symptom score(iTOSS), Physician-assessed nasal symptom score (PNSS), rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life (RQLQ), rhinitis control assessment test (RCAT) and adverse events (AEs) were measured."( Efficacy and safety of twice-daily olopatadine-mometasone combination nasal spray (GSP301) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, R; Sima, G; Zhang, Y; Zheng, D, 2022
)
0.72
"GSP301 is a safe and well-tolerated medication."( Efficacy and safety of twice-daily olopatadine-mometasone combination nasal spray (GSP301) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, R; Sima, G; Zhang, Y; Zheng, D, 2022
)
0.72
" The primary endpoint was incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) over 52-weeks."( Long-term safety of once-daily indacaterol acetate/glycopyrronium bromide/mometasone furoate high-dose, and indacaterol acetate/mometasone furoate high-dose, in Japanese patients with inadequately controlled asthma: Results from two open-label, 52-week st
D'Andrea, P; Hosoe, M; Matsuo, K; Nakamura, Y; Pethe, A; Sagara, H; Tanaka, Y; Tanase, AM, 2023
)
1.14
" Additional assessments included instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score, Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, reflective Total Ocular Symptoms Score, instantaneous Total Ocular Symptoms Score, individual symptoms, Physician-assessed Nasal Symptom Score, and adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of GSP301 nasal spray in children aged 6 to 11 years with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Amar, NJ; Caracta, CF; Hampel, FC; Prenner, BM; Wu, W, 2022
)
0.72
" Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 12."( Efficacy and safety of GSP301 nasal spray in children aged 6 to 11 years with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Amar, NJ; Caracta, CF; Hampel, FC; Prenner, BM; Wu, W, 2022
)
0.72
" Thus, ligands with potential therapeutic applications and fewer adverse effects are needed."( Oral mometasone furoate administration preserves anti-inflammatory action with fewer metabolic adverse effects in rats.
Almeida, MS; Bruxel, MA; Rafacho, A; Zimath, PL, 2023
)
1.42
" Also, the potential reversibility of the adverse effects was assessed."( Oral mometasone furoate administration preserves anti-inflammatory action with fewer metabolic adverse effects in rats.
Almeida, MS; Bruxel, MA; Rafacho, A; Zimath, PL, 2023
)
1.42
" The anti-inflammatory and metabolic adverse effects of MF were GR-dependent, and metabolic outcomes altered by MF administration were reversible."( Oral mometasone furoate administration preserves anti-inflammatory action with fewer metabolic adverse effects in rats.
Almeida, MS; Bruxel, MA; Rafacho, A; Zimath, PL, 2023
)
1.42

Pharmacokinetics

Clinical evidence suggests no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions between indacaterol (IND), glycopyrronium (GLY) and mometasone furoate (MF) This study evaluated the systemic safety and performance of a bioabsorbable sinus implant.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"This article reviews the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of MFNS, highlighting the potential clinical relevance of data concerning its glucocorticoid receptor binding, bioavailability, and metabolism, and its role in activating and suppressing transcription of steroid-dependent genes."( Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of mometasone furoate nasal spray: potential effects on clinical safety and efficacy.
Hochhaus, G, 2008
)
0.61
" The efficacy and safety profiles of MFNS seen in clinical use are consistent with its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties."( Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of mometasone furoate nasal spray: potential effects on clinical safety and efficacy.
Hochhaus, G, 2008
)
0.61
" This pharmacokinetic study evaluated the systemic safety and performance of a bioabsorbable sinus implant that gradually releases 1350 μg of mometasone furoate directly to the sinus mucosa."( Steroid-eluting sinus implant for in-office treatment of recurrent polyposis: a pharmacokinetic study.
Clutter, D; Gawlicka, AK; Groppo, E; Ow, R, 2014
)
0.6
" We describe here a study designed to assess any pharmacokinetic (PK) and/or biopharmaceutical interaction between indacaterol and mometasone furoate when administered via the Breezhaler(®) device, either alone or in a free or fixed combination (QMF149) in healthy adult subjects."( Pharmacokinetics of indacaterol and mometasone furoate delivered alone or in a free or fixed dose combination in healthy subjects.
Calder, N; Febbraro, S; Fuhr, R; Hara, H; Khindri, S; Machineni, S; Majumdar, T; Vaidya, SS; Woessner, R, 2016
)
0.91
"Approach 1 suggested PK profiles which agreed well with the published pharmacokinetic profiles."( Predicting Pulmonary Pharmacokinetics from In Vitro Properties of Dry Powder Inhalers.
Absar, M; Bhagwat, S; Chen, MJ; Delvadia, R; Hochhaus, G; Saluja, B; Schilling, U; Wei, X, 2017
)
0.46
" To assess the relative bioavailability of olopatadine in the fixed-dose nasal spray versus two monotherapies, pharmacokinetic (PK) estimates, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last time point with measurable concentration (AUC0-t), and AUC from time 0 to time infinity (AUC0-∞) were compared by analysis of variance."( Pharmacokinetics of intranasal olopatadine in the fixed-dose combination GSP301 versus two monotherapy intranasal olopatadine formulations.
Patel, P; Salapatek, AM; Talluri, RS; Tantry, SK, 2018
)
0.48
" To evaluate the relative bioavailability of mometasone, pharmacokinetic (PK) estimates, the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last time point with measurable concentration (AUC0-t), and AUC from time 0 to time infinity (AUC0-∞) were compared by analysis of variance."( Pharmacokinetics of intranasal mometasone in the fixed-dose combination GSP301 versus two monotherapy intranasal mometasone formulations.
Patel, P; Salapatek, AM; Talluri, RS; Tantry, SK, 2018
)
0.48
" A slightly higher Cmax was observed with GSP301 than with MF, but AUC was comparable."( Pharmacokinetics of intranasal mometasone in the fixed-dose combination GSP301 versus two monotherapy intranasal mometasone formulations.
Patel, P; Salapatek, AM; Talluri, RS; Tantry, SK, 2018
)
0.48
" There was no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between IND, GLY and MF when administered as IND/GLY/MF."( Pharmacokinetics of indacaterol, glycopyrronium and mometasone furoate following once-daily inhalation as a combination in healthy subjects.
Abdallah, N; Drollmann, A; Ethell, B; Hahn, M; Heudi, O; Ignatenko, S; Jauernig, J; Last, S; Machineni, S; Radhakrishnan, R; Tillmann, HC; Vaidya, S, 2020
)
0.81
"Clinical evidence suggests no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions between indacaterol (IND), glycopyrronium (GLY) and mometasone furoate (MF)."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium/Mometasone Furoate After Administration of Combination Therapies Using the Breezhaler
Bartels, C; Jain, M; Tillmann, HC; Vaidya, S; Yu, J, 2021
)
1.06
"The final pharmacokinetic models were two-compartment disposition models with first-order elimination and sequential zero-order/first-order absorption (IND), with bolus administration and first-order elimination (GLY), and with mixed zero-order/first-order absorption and first-order elimination (MF)."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium/Mometasone Furoate After Administration of Combination Therapies Using the Breezhaler
Bartels, C; Jain, M; Tillmann, HC; Vaidya, S; Yu, J, 2021
)
0.86
" The pharmacokinetic profiles of MF were comparable for combination products at corresponding medium- or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium/Mometasone Furoate After Administration of Combination Therapies Using the Breezhaler
Bartels, C; Jain, M; Tillmann, HC; Vaidya, S; Yu, J, 2021
)
0.86
" While budesonide is the most common steroid irrigation for this indication, mometasone has a superior pharmacokinetic profile, which may allow dose escalation."( The possibility of short-term hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression with high-volume, high-dose nasal mometasone irrigation in postsurgical patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.
Batra, PS; Brown, HJ; Eggerstedt, M; Ganti, A; Papagiannopoulos, P; Tajudeen, BA, 2022
)
0.72
"), this study aims to characterize the pharmacokinetic profiles of both doses of LYR-210 at earlier timepoints post-placement in patients with CRS."( Pharmacokinetic Evidence of Steady and Sustained Drug Release from Long-Acting Implantable Corticosteroid Matrices for Chronic Rhinosinusitis.
Brayton, L; Kakarlapudi, V; Kuang, Y; McIntyre, J; Naclerio, RM; Ow, RA; Pappas, A; Shao, J; Shotts, S; You, C, 2022
)
0.72
" In addition to in vitro and human pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, this includes a comparative clinical endpoint study to ensure equivalent bioavailability of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) at the site of action."( Sensitivity of Pharmacokinetics to Differences in the Particle Size Distribution for Formulations of Locally Acting Mometasone Furoate Suspension-Based Nasal Sprays.
Absar, M; Al-Humiari, M; Amini, E; Bachhav, S; Baumstein, SM; Berger, SM; Bielski, E; Boc, S; Bulitta, JB; Carrasco, C; Chen, MJ; Conti, DS; Delvadia, R; Dhapare, S; Drescher, S; Hochhaus, G; Iley, T; Jiao, Y; Leon Astudillo, CE; Luke, MC; Newman, B; Oguntimein, O; Price, R; Saluja, B; Schilling, U; Shur, J; Tang, Y; Witzmann, K, 2023
)
1.12

Compound-Compound Interactions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"05% monotherapy, and were higher still when tazarotene was used in combination with mometasone furoate."( Tazarotene 0.1% gel in combination with mometasone furoate cream in plaque psoriasis: a photographic tracking study.
Poulin, YP, 1999
)
0.8
"This study was designed to investigate the clinical effect of montelukast sodium combined with inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS)."( Clinical effect of montelukast sodium combined with inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of OSAS children.
Liang, J; Shu, Y; Yang, DZ; Yao, HB; Zhang, F, 2017
)
0.46
"To examine the clinical typing and individualized treatment approach for allergic rhinitis and to determine the optimal treatment method for this disease using various drug combination therapies."( Individualized treatment for allergic rhinitis based on key nasal clinical manifestations combined with histamine and leukotriene D4 levels.
Chen, F; Li, G; Shen, C; Wang, H; Wen, Z; Zhang, X,
)
0.13
"Clinical symptom evaluation combined with experimental detection of histamine and leukotriene levels can be an objective and accurate method to clinically classify the allergic rhinitis types."( Individualized treatment for allergic rhinitis based on key nasal clinical manifestations combined with histamine and leukotriene D4 levels.
Chen, F; Li, G; Shen, C; Wang, H; Wen, Z; Zhang, X,
)
0.13
"To investigate the effect of drug treatment combined with psychological intervention on mental disorders in patients with persistent moderate-severe allergic rhinitis."( Improvement in Psychological Condition of Patients With Persistent Moderate-Severe Allergic Rhinitis by Drug Therapy Combined With Psychological Intervention.
Di, LL; Kang, ZP; Liu, J; Peng, XB; Tan, Y; Wang, LX; Yang, ZC, 2021
)
0.62
"Drug therapy or drug therapy combined with psychological intervention can alleviate anxiety and depression of patients with persistent moderate-severe allergic rhinitis and improve their quality of life."( Improvement in Psychological Condition of Patients With Persistent Moderate-Severe Allergic Rhinitis by Drug Therapy Combined With Psychological Intervention.
Di, LL; Kang, ZP; Liu, J; Peng, XB; Tan, Y; Wang, LX; Yang, ZC, 2021
)
0.62

Bioavailability

Mometasone furoate (MF) is a synthetic steroid exhibiting a strong affinity for the glucocorticoid receptor as well as a low bioavailability and a high plasma protein binding. It should be noted that systemic bioavailability after intranasal therapy with mometas one furoates is lowest with respect to other steroid molecules.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Systemic bioavailability of INSs, by way of nasal and intestinal absorption, can be substantial; but current INSs vary significantly in their degree of first-pass hepatic inactivation and clearance from the body of the swallowed drug."( Systemic effects of intranasal steroids: an endocrinologist's perspective.
Allen, DB, 2000
)
0.31
"These studies were conducted to assess the systemic bioavailability of mometasone furoate (MF) administered by both the dry-powder inhaler (DPI) and the metered-dose inhaler with an alternate propellant (MDI-AP)."( Bioavailability and metabolism of mometasone furoate following administration by metered-dose and dry-powder inhalers in healthy human volunteers.
Affrime, MB; Alton, K; Cayen, MN; Clement, RP; Cuss, F; Kantesaria, B; Lim, J; Padhi, D; Pai, S; Wirth, M, 2000
)
0.82
"This article reviews available data on the comparative structure-activity relationships, chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and systemic bioavailability of fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate to assess whether claims of differences in the absolute systemic bioavailability of the 2 compounds are supported by the published literature."( A review of the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of inhaled fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate.
Crim, C; Daley-Yates, PT; Pierre, LN, 2001
)
0.72
" A systematic review was conducted of the identified literature pertaining to the molecular structure, topical potency, lipophilicity, pharmacokinetics, and bioavailability of the 2 agents."( A review of the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of inhaled fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate.
Crim, C; Daley-Yates, PT; Pierre, LN, 2001
)
0.53
" When administered intranasally, mometasone furoate is reported to have comparable relative systemic bioavailability to that of fluticasone propionate (mean plasma area under the curve, 123 pmol x h/L vs 112 pmol x h/L, respectively)."( A review of the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of inhaled fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate.
Crim, C; Daley-Yates, PT; Pierre, LN, 2001
)
0.81
" Recently, it has been reported that inhaled mometasone furoate has a systemic bioavailability of less than 1%, which is much lower than other corticosteroids currently available."( Bioavailability and metabolism of mometasone furoate: pharmacology versus methodology.
Daley-Yates, PT; Derendorf, H; Efthimiou, J; Pierre, LN, 2002
)
0.85
" If these degradation and metabolic products are also formed and active in humans in vivo, both MF and its 'active' products need to be taken into account when determining the systemic bioavailability of MF and in establishing concentration-effect relationships with this drug."( Mometasone furoate degradation and metabolism in human biological fluids and tissues.
Cutler, DJ; Davies, NM; Teng, XW, 2003
)
1.76
"FP and MF have similar and very low systemic bioavailability when administered intranasally using a high-dose regimen."( Bioavailability of fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate aqueous nasal sprays.
Andrews, SM; Callejas, S; Daley-Yates, PT; Kunka, RL; Ng, C; Yin, Y, 2004
)
0.58
" The systemic bioavailability of MF is claimed to be negligible, leading to a minimal potential for systemic adverse effects."( Adrenal suppression with dry powder formulations of fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate.
Fardon, TC; Haggart, K; Lee, DK; Lipworth, BJ; McFarlane, LC, 2004
)
0.55
" The drug is well tolerated, with low systemic bioavailability and minimal systemic activity."( Inhaled mometasone furoate: A review of its use in persistent asthma in adults and adolescents.
McCormack, PL; Plosker, GL, 2006
)
0.77
" The systemic bioavailability of MF has been claimed to be minimal (1%)."( Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of urinary cortisol suppression after inhalation of fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate.
Fardon, TC; Haggart, K; Hochhaus, G; Lee, DK; Lipworth, BJ; McFarlane, LC; Tayab, ZR, 2007
)
0.55
" MF has comparable bioavailability to FP based on the steady-state concentrations observed for the different doses."( Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of urinary cortisol suppression after inhalation of fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate.
Fardon, TC; Haggart, K; Hochhaus, G; Lee, DK; Lipworth, BJ; McFarlane, LC; Tayab, ZR, 2007
)
0.55
" MF had low systemic bioavailability and no clinically significant hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis suppression at therapeutic doses."( Mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler: a once-daily inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of persistent asthma.
Karpel, JP; Nelson, H, 2007
)
1.78
" MF-DPI has low systemic bioavailability and high glucocorticoid receptor affinity compared with most other ICSs and modifies inflammatory mediators involved in the pathogenesis of asthma."( Mometasone furoate dry-powder inhaler for the control of persistent asthma.
D'Urzo, A, 2007
)
1.78
" Its systemic bioavailability (0."( Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of mometasone furoate nasal spray: potential effects on clinical safety and efficacy.
Hochhaus, G, 2008
)
0.61
" Low systemic bioavailability and high relative binding affinity for the glucocorticoid receptor are properties of MF that allow for a favourable efficacy and tolerability profile."( Mometasone furoate: an effective anti-inflammatory with a well-defined safety and tolerability profile in the treatment of asthma.
Bousquet, J, 2009
)
1.8
" It should be noted that systemic bioavailability after intranasal therapy with mometasone furoate (MF) is lowest with respect to other steroid molecules."( [Intranasal steroid therapy in inflammatory nasal-sinus pathology in pediatric age].
Berlucchi, M; Tomenzoli, D, 2009
)
0.58
" Mometasone furoate has approximately 1% oral bioavailability but does produce systemic glucocorticoid effects from the drug released from the lung and its metabolites."( Mometasone furoate: an inhaled glucocorticoid for the management of asthma in adults and children.
Cowie, RL; Giembycz, MA; Leigh, R, 2009
)
2.71
" It is concluded that, taking into account high bioavailability of dexametasone and hydrocortisone (> 80%) and contraindications to their intranasal administration, the preference should be given to medications with lower bioavailability."( [Effectiveness criteria for the topical application of glucocorticosteroids to the treatment of exudative otitis media associated with allergic rhinitis].
Poliakova, SD; Popova, EA, 2010
)
0.36
"By delivering immunomodulatory drugs in vivo directly to lymph nodes draining an injection site, an opportunity exists to increase drug bioavailability to local immune cells."( Nano-sized drug-loaded micelles deliver payload to lymph node immune cells and prolong allograft survival.
Dane, KY; Eby, JK; Hubbell, JA; Inverardi, L; Nembrini, C; O'Neil, CP; Swartz, MA; Tomei, AA; Velluto, D, 2011
)
0.37
" Thus, the topical bioavailability of the active ingredient mometasone furoate (0."( Bioavailability, antipsoriatic efficacy and tolerability of a new light cream with mometasone furoate 0.1%.
Korting, HC; Schöllmann, C; Wigger-Alberti, W; Willers, C, 2012
)
0.85
" Mometasone furoate (MF) is a synthetic steroid exhibiting a strong affinity for the glucocorticoid receptor as well as a low bioavailability and a high plasma protein binding."( A review of mometasone furoate / formoterol in the treatment of asthma.
Backer, V; Porsbjerg, C; Westergaard, CG, 2013
)
1.67
" Pharmacokinetic studies have revealed no drug-drug interactions but a discrete increase in bioavailability of fluticasone propionate which was considered clinically unimportant."( New patents of fixed combinations of nasal antihistamines and corticosteroids in allergic rhinitis.
Wolthers, OD, 2013
)
0.39
" Mometasone furoate is a potent synthetic steroid with a very high receptor affinity and a low bioavailability and shown to be superior compared to other inhaled corticosteroids."( Mometasone furoate nasal spray for the treatment of asthma.
Backer, V; Meteran, H, 2016
)
2.79
" Results showed that the condition of the skin had no significant impact on the cutaneous bioavailability of MMF, but the intrinsic effect of the O/W vehicle could be utilized in periods of acute inflammation."( Ex vivo Cutaneous Bioavailability of Topical Mometasone Furoate in an O/W Preparation.
Michael, J; Neubert, RH; Sommer, E; Wohlrab, J, 2016
)
0.69
"Both approaches derived the total lung doses and the central to peripheral lung deposition ratios from clinically relevant cascade impactor studies, but differed in the way the pulmonary absorption rate was derived."( Predicting Pulmonary Pharmacokinetics from In Vitro Properties of Dry Powder Inhalers.
Absar, M; Bhagwat, S; Chen, MJ; Delvadia, R; Hochhaus, G; Saluja, B; Schilling, U; Wei, X, 2017
)
0.46
" Similarly, within approach 2, input parameters for the pulmonary absorption rate constant derived from dissolution rate experiments were able to reasonably predict the pharmacokinetic profiles published in literature."( Predicting Pulmonary Pharmacokinetics from In Vitro Properties of Dry Powder Inhalers.
Absar, M; Bhagwat, S; Chen, MJ; Delvadia, R; Hochhaus, G; Saluja, B; Schilling, U; Wei, X, 2017
)
0.46
"To assess the relative bioavailability of olopatadine administered as GSP301 versus two olopatadine monotherapy nasal spray formulations."( Pharmacokinetics of intranasal olopatadine in the fixed-dose combination GSP301 versus two monotherapy intranasal olopatadine formulations.
Patel, P; Salapatek, AM; Talluri, RS; Tantry, SK, 2018
)
0.48
" To assess the relative bioavailability of olopatadine in the fixed-dose nasal spray versus two monotherapies, pharmacokinetic (PK) estimates, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last time point with measurable concentration (AUC0-t), and AUC from time 0 to time infinity (AUC0-∞) were compared by analysis of variance."( Pharmacokinetics of intranasal olopatadine in the fixed-dose combination GSP301 versus two monotherapy intranasal olopatadine formulations.
Patel, P; Salapatek, AM; Talluri, RS; Tantry, SK, 2018
)
0.48
"Olopatadine bioavailability with GSP301 was comparable with OLO-sponsor and OLO."( Pharmacokinetics of intranasal olopatadine in the fixed-dose combination GSP301 versus two monotherapy intranasal olopatadine formulations.
Patel, P; Salapatek, AM; Talluri, RS; Tantry, SK, 2018
)
0.48
"To assess the relative bioavailability of mometasone administered as GSP301 FDC versus two mometasone monotherapy NS formulations."( Pharmacokinetics of intranasal mometasone in the fixed-dose combination GSP301 versus two monotherapy intranasal mometasone formulations.
Patel, P; Salapatek, AM; Talluri, RS; Tantry, SK, 2018
)
0.48
" To evaluate the relative bioavailability of mometasone, pharmacokinetic (PK) estimates, the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last time point with measurable concentration (AUC0-t), and AUC from time 0 to time infinity (AUC0-∞) were compared by analysis of variance."( Pharmacokinetics of intranasal mometasone in the fixed-dose combination GSP301 versus two monotherapy intranasal mometasone formulations.
Patel, P; Salapatek, AM; Talluri, RS; Tantry, SK, 2018
)
0.48
"Mometasone bioavailability with GSP301 was comparable with MF-sponsor and MF monotherapies."( Pharmacokinetics of intranasal mometasone in the fixed-dose combination GSP301 versus two monotherapy intranasal mometasone formulations.
Patel, P; Salapatek, AM; Talluri, RS; Tantry, SK, 2018
)
0.48
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" However, no information is available on the absorption rate of topical mometasone on the sinonasal surface."( Mometasone absorption in cultured airway epithelium.
Ebert, CS; Ehrmann, BM; Kimple, AJ; Lee, RE; Lewis, CA; Mascenik, T; Nguyen, TT; Randell, SH; Senior, BA; Soma, PS; Thorp, BD; Zanation, AM, 2019
)
0.51
"Study 1: For intravenous MF and FP, respectively: absolute bioavailability was 11."( Comparative clinical pharmacology of mometasone furoate, fluticasone propionate and fluticasone furoate.
Daley-Yates, PT; Deans, A; Mehta, R; Sousa, AR, 2022
)
0.99
"Single inhaled and intravenous doses of MF and FP (400 μg) resulted in similar bioavailability and reductions in serum cortisol."( Comparative clinical pharmacology of mometasone furoate, fluticasone propionate and fluticasone furoate.
Daley-Yates, PT; Deans, A; Mehta, R; Sousa, AR, 2022
)
0.99
" Due to its poor bioavailability we further investigated whether nanoparticles (NPs) made of zein protein may constitute a safe and effective choice to incorporate MF."( Zein nanoparticles as oral carrier for mometasone furoate delivery.
Dias, S; Pinto, S; Rafacho, A; Sarmento, B; Zimath, P, 2023
)
1.18
" In addition to in vitro and human pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, this includes a comparative clinical endpoint study to ensure equivalent bioavailability of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) at the site of action."( Sensitivity of Pharmacokinetics to Differences in the Particle Size Distribution for Formulations of Locally Acting Mometasone Furoate Suspension-Based Nasal Sprays.
Absar, M; Al-Humiari, M; Amini, E; Bachhav, S; Baumstein, SM; Berger, SM; Bielski, E; Boc, S; Bulitta, JB; Carrasco, C; Chen, MJ; Conti, DS; Delvadia, R; Dhapare, S; Drescher, S; Hochhaus, G; Iley, T; Jiao, Y; Leon Astudillo, CE; Luke, MC; Newman, B; Oguntimein, O; Price, R; Saluja, B; Schilling, U; Shur, J; Tang, Y; Witzmann, K, 2023
)
1.12
"We found that nanoparticulation of MF enhances local intranasal absorption, and nasal bioavailability is higher than that of CA-MF."( Nasal Absorption Enhancement of Mometasone Furoate Nanocrystal Dispersions.
Deguchi, S; Kanai, K; Kawasaki, N; Masuda, S; Nagai, N; Ogata, F; Otake, H; Yoshitomi, J, 2023
)
1.19

Dosage Studied

Mometasone furoate NS doses of 200 microg administered once or twice daily produced greater reductions in bilateral polyp grade at the end point than placebo. In clinical trials, once-daily evening dosing was effective in patients with mild to moderate asthma previously treated with short-acting beta2-agonists alone.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" The once-daily dosing schedule of MFNS may improve patient compliance, while its high margin of systemic safety and rapid onset of action may enhance patient and physician acceptance."( Once-daily mometasone furoate nasal spray: efficacy and safety of a new intranasal glucocorticoid for allergic rhinitis.
Davies, RJ; Nelson, HS,
)
0.52
"This study was conducted to determine the dose-response relationship of 3 different doses of MFNS in a pediatric population."( A dose-ranging study of mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Anolik, R; Berger, WE; Berkowitz, RB; Bronsky, EA; Dockhorn, RJ; Dvorin, DJ; Finn, AF; Galant, SP; Grossman, J; Hampel, FC; Meltzer, EO; Mesarina-Wicki, B; Nolop, K; Ratner, PH; Ruff, ME; Schenkel, EJ; Segal, AT; Segall, N; Skoner, DP; Stewart, GE; Tripathy, I; van Bavel, J, 1999
)
0.61
"These results indicate that the most appropriate therapeutic dosage of MFNS in the treatment of SAR in children 6 to 11 years of age is 100 microgram once daily."( A dose-ranging study of mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Anolik, R; Berger, WE; Berkowitz, RB; Bronsky, EA; Dockhorn, RJ; Dvorin, DJ; Finn, AF; Galant, SP; Grossman, J; Hampel, FC; Meltzer, EO; Mesarina-Wicki, B; Nolop, K; Ratner, PH; Ruff, ME; Schenkel, EJ; Segal, AT; Segall, N; Skoner, DP; Stewart, GE; Tripathy, I; van Bavel, J, 1999
)
0.61
" A simplified, once-daily dosing regimen may foster improved compliance."( Once-daily mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in the treatment of patients with persistent asthma.
Banov, C; Corren, J; Feinstein, BK; Floreani, A; Friedman, BF; Goldsobel, A; Gottschlich, GM; Hannaway, PJ; Harrison, JE; Lampl, KL; Lapidus, RJ; Lawrence, M; Lumry, W; Munk, Z; Nayak, AS; Nolop, KB; Pearlman, D; Scardella, AT; Schenkel, EJ; Segal, AT; Segall, N; Shneyer, L; Silverman, B, 2000
)
0.7
"To test the lower range of the dose-response curve, effects of MF delivered by dry powder inhaler (DPI) on AMP-induced bronchoconstriction were compared with those of placebo."( Mometasone furoate antagonizes AMP-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with mild asthma.
Arshad, H; Harrison, JE; Holgate, ST; Stryszak, P, 2000
)
1.75
"The safety and efficacy of two once daily dosing regimens (200 microg and 400 microg) of mometasone furoate (MF) administered in the morning by using a dry-powder inhaler (DPI) were compared with those of a twice daily dosing regimen (200 microg administered twice daily) in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma previously taking only inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonists."( Mometasone furoate administered once daily is as effective as twice-daily administration for treatment of mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.
Berkowitz, RB; Harrison, JE; Kemp, JP; Miller, SD; Murray, JJ; Nolop, K, 2000
)
1.97
" A review of available information indicates that (1) sensitive tests can measure the effects of INSs on biologic feedback systems, but they do not accurately predict clinically relevant adverse effects; (2) the primary factors that influence the relationship between therapeutic and adverse systemic effects of INSs are dosing frequency and efficiency of hepatic inactivation of swallowed drug; (3) INS treatment in recommended doses does not cause clinically significant hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression; (4) growth suppression can occur with twice-daily administration of certain INSs but does not appear to occur with once-daily dosing or with agents with more complete first-pass hepatic inactivation; (5) harmful effects of INSs on bone metabolism have not yet been adequately studied but would not be expected with the use of an INS dose and dosing frequency that do not suppress basal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function or growth; and (6) these conclusions apply to INS treatment alone and in recommended doses-the risk of adverse effects in individual patients who are treated with INSs is increased by excessive dosing or concomitant inhaled corticosteroid or other topical corticosteroid therapy."( Systemic effects of intranasal steroids: an endocrinologist's perspective.
Allen, DB, 2000
)
0.31
" Plasma concentrations were near the lower limit of quantitation (50 pg/mL) at the MF DPI 400-microg qd dosage and approximately 250 pg/mL at the 1,200-microg qd dosage."( Mometasone furoate has minimal effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis when delivered at high doses.
Affrime, MB; Flannery, BE; Herron, JM; Kosoglou, T; Thonoor, CM, 2000
)
1.75
"The MF 800-microg bid dosage (1,600 microg/d), which is twice the highest projected clinical dosage, represents the lower limit for consistently detectable systemic effects of MF."( Mometasone furoate has minimal effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis when delivered at high doses.
Affrime, MB; Flannery, BE; Herron, JM; Kosoglou, T; Thonoor, CM, 2000
)
1.75
"Once-daily dosing with an effective inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) would likely enhance compliance and, therefore, aid in the management of asthma."( Comparison of once-daily to twice-daily treatment with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler.
Bensch, GW; Karpel, JP; Lutsky, BN; Nolop, KB; Noonan, M; Ramsdell, JW; Webb, DR, 2001
)
0.56
"Several once-daily dosing regimens of mometasone furoate (MF) administered by dry powder inhaler (DPI) were compared with a twice-daily dosing regimen in 286 patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma who were previously being treated with ICS."( Comparison of once-daily to twice-daily treatment with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler.
Bensch, GW; Karpel, JP; Lutsky, BN; Nolop, KB; Noonan, M; Ramsdell, JW; Webb, DR, 2001
)
0.83
" Once-daily dosing offers an effective and convenient treatment that could aid compliance in the treatment of asthma."( Comparison of once-daily to twice-daily treatment with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler.
Bensch, GW; Karpel, JP; Lutsky, BN; Nolop, KB; Noonan, M; Ramsdell, JW; Webb, DR, 2001
)
0.56
" All dosage groups showed improvement at endpoint."( Dose-ranging study of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in the treatment of moderate persistent asthma using fluticasone propionate as an active comparator.
Bonnaud, G; Haahtela, T; Luna, JM; Lutsky, BN; O'Connor, B; Querfurt, H; Wegener, T, 2001
)
0.63
" They were operated on with sector resection and scheduled for postoperative radiotherapy using photons with identical radiation qualities and dosage to the breast parenchyma."( Potent corticosteroid cream (mometasone furoate) significantly reduces acute radiation dermatitis: results from a double-blind, randomized study.
Bergh, J; Berne, B; Boström, A; Lindman, H; Swartling, C, 2001
)
0.6
" MF-DPI is effective at attenuating allergen-induced early and late responses, airway hyperresponsiveness, and sputum eosinophilia, and dose-response effects exist for the attenuation of the late response."( Dose-dependent effects of inhaled mometasone furoate on airway function and inflammation after allergen inhalation challenge.
Gauvreau, GM; Inman, MD; Lutsky, BN; O'Byrne, PM; Rerecich, T; Stryszak, P; Watson, RM, 2001
)
0.59
" In a preliminary study, involving 7 days' challenge with allergen, promising symptom consistency was obtained and dose-response to a glucocorticosteroid could, in part, be demonstrated."( Establishing a model of seasonal allergic rhinitis and demonstrating dose-response to a topical glucocorticosteroid.
Ahlström-Emanuelsson, C; Akerlund, A; Andersson, M; Greiff, L; Hosszu, Z; Persson, CG; Svensson, C, 2002
)
0.31
" Areas under the dose-response curve were calculated to determine relative potencies."( Fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate have equivalent transcriptional potencies.
Bousquet, J; Henriquet, C; Mathieu, M; Roumestan, C, 2003
)
0.62
" Although compliance to this type of medication is often suboptimal and once-daily dosing can help to improve adherence to the treatment, the clinical implications of such a mode of administration should be determined."( Once-daily inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma.
Boulet, LP, 2004
)
0.32
" An increased frequency of dosing seems preferable if asthma becomes uncontrolled or is severe, although this requires further study."( Once-daily inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma.
Boulet, LP, 2004
)
0.32
"Once-daily dosing with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) may simplify asthma management and improve patient compliance."( Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate administered once-daily in the evening in patients with persistent asthma dependent on inhaled corticosteroids.
Boulet, LP; Busse, WW; D'Urzo, A; Karpel, JP; Lutsky, B; Monahan, ME; Staudinger, H, 2005
)
0.64
"Once-daily evening dosing of MF-DPI at doses of 400 and 200 microg restored lung function and improved nocturnal and daytime symptom control in subjects with asthma previously dependent on bid ICS therapy."( Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate administered once-daily in the evening in patients with persistent asthma dependent on inhaled corticosteroids.
Boulet, LP; Busse, WW; D'Urzo, A; Karpel, JP; Lutsky, B; Monahan, ME; Staudinger, H, 2005
)
0.64
"Mometasone furoate NS doses of 200 microg administered once or twice daily produced greater reductions in bilateral polyp grade at the end point than placebo, with differences reaching statistical significance with twice-daily dosing (P = ."( A randomized controlled trial of mometasone furoate nasal spray for the treatment of nasal polyposis.
Bellussi, L; Danzig, M; Jorissen, M; Mösges, R; Passàli, D; Staudinger, H; Stjärne, P, 2006
)
2.06
" Once-daily dosing with mometasone furoate DPI was well tolerated."( Once-daily evening administration of mometasone furoate in asthma treatment initiation.
Bensch, GW; Berkowitz, R; Galant, S; Lutsky, B; Prenner, B; Ramsdell, J, 2006
)
0.91
" Once-daily administration of mometasone furoate 200 microg in the evening was more effective than administration of the same dosage in the morning."( Inhaled mometasone furoate: A review of its use in persistent asthma in adults and adolescents.
McCormack, PL; Plosker, GL, 2006
)
1.06
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens of mometasone furoate DPI in the treatment of mild-to-moderate persistent asthma in children previously using inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs)."( Effects of treatment with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in children with persistent asthma.
Berger, WE; Chervinsky, P; Lutsky, BN; Milgrom, H; Noonan, M; Staudinger, H; Weinstein, SF, 2006
)
0.88
"A 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study evaluated 2 dosing regimens of mometasone furoate DPI (100 microg every evening and 100 microg twice daily) in 296 children 4 to 11 years old with asthma previously using ICSs."( Effects of treatment with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in children with persistent asthma.
Berger, WE; Chervinsky, P; Lutsky, BN; Milgrom, H; Noonan, M; Staudinger, H; Weinstein, SF, 2006
)
0.85
" In clinical trials, once-daily evening dosing of mometasone furoate delivered via dry powder inhaler (200 or 400 mu g/day) was effective in patients with mild to moderate asthma previously treated with short-acting beta2-agonists alone and in those previously maintained on inhaled corticosteroid therapy."( The efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate delivered via a dry powder inhaler for the treatment of asthma.
Meltzer, EO; Wenzel, S, 2006
)
0.88
" Once-daily dosing of MF-DPI was effective in patients with mild or moderate persistent asthma previously taking twice-daily regimens of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), and in patients taking only inhaled beta2-agonists for symptom relief."( Mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler: a once-daily inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of persistent asthma.
Karpel, JP; Nelson, H, 2007
)
1.78
" Allergy symptoms (sneezing, runny, itchy, and stuffy nose) were rated by patients at 16 time points during 12 hours after dosing and patient satisfaction was assessed at 4 and 12 hours postdose."( Onset and duration of action of nasal sprays in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients: olopatadine hydrochloride versus mometasone furoate monohydrate.
Brubaker, M; Conroy, JP; Crenshaw, K; Garadi, R; Kaji, Y; Patel, D; Wall, GM; Whitling, A,
)
0.34
"This open-label study did not identify differences between morning and evening dosing of MF-DPI 400 microg QD."( Comparable morning versus evening administration of once-daily mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler.
Dahl, R; Lindqvist, A; Olsson, P; Zetterström, O, 2008
)
0.59
" After randomization to placebo or MF, they used a nasal spray for 3 months at a dosage of 200 microg."( To treat snoring with nasal steroids - effects on more than one level?
Harder, H; Harder, L; Hultcrantz, E; Roberg, K; Zetterlund, EL, 2010
)
0.36
" Both MF-DPI doses tested are twice the approved pediatric dosage of 100 microg once-daily (QD) for children aged 4-11 years."( Long-term safety of mometasone furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler in children: Results of an open-label study comparing mometasone furoate with beclomethasone dipropionate in children with persistent asthma.
Corren, J; Leflein, J; Noonan, M; Staudinger, H, 2009
)
0.68
"Once-evening moderate dosing (400 microg) MF-DPI does not suppress HPA axis function in adults with mild to moderate asthma."( Once-daily evening dosing of mometasone furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler does not adversely affect the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.
Cutler, DL; Herron, JM; Kosoglou, T; Staudinger, H, 2010
)
0.65
"To examine the evidence for the efficacy of once daily dosing of mometasone furoate (MF) and to establish the dose-response relationship for MF in asthma."( Frequency of dosing and comparative doses of mometasone furoate: a meta-analysis.
Beasley, R; Hart, K; Shirtcliffe, P; Weatherall, M, 2009
)
0.85
"Meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trials, identified through a Medline and EMBASE search, comparing once versus twice daily dosing with the same dose and/or comparing two different doses that presented data on measurements of clinical efficacy."( Frequency of dosing and comparative doses of mometasone furoate: a meta-analysis.
Beasley, R; Hart, K; Shirtcliffe, P; Weatherall, M, 2009
)
0.61
"For the outcome variables considered, once daily dosing of MF is as effective as twice daily dosing, which may be useful in improving compliance in the treatment of asthma."( Frequency of dosing and comparative doses of mometasone furoate: a meta-analysis.
Beasley, R; Hart, K; Shirtcliffe, P; Weatherall, M, 2009
)
0.61
"Self-adjusted dosage of mometasone furoate nasal spray gives reasonable control of allergic rhinitis (albeit with some 'breakthrough' symptoms)."( Daily versus self-adjusted dosing of topical mometasone furoate nasal spray in patients with allergic rhinitis: randomised, controlled trial.
Abou-Halawa, AS; Al-Robaee, AA; Al-Shobaili, HA; Alzolibani, AA; Khan, MA, 2010
)
0.93
"Mean adherence rates were greater with a once-daily dosing regimen of MF-DPI than with a twice-daily dosing regimen."( Improved adherence with once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of mometasone furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler: a randomized open-label study.
Bullen, K; Horne, R; Price, D; Rand, C; Robertson, A; Staudinger, H, 2010
)
0.6
" In both adults and children, once-daily dosing of MF-DPI has been demonstrated to be as efficacious as twice-daily dosing."( Use of mometasone furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler in the treatment of asthma.
Corren, J; Tashkin, DP; Zeidler, M, 2010
)
0.82
" Data from the clinical trial program for MF-DPI that establish the efficacy, long-term safety, and absence of systemic effects of the approved dosage in children with mild to moderate persistent asthma are reviewed."( Mometasone furoate in children with mild to moderate persistent asthma: a review of the evidence.
Milgrom, H, 2010
)
1.8
" Improved adherence to mometasone furoate versus beclomethasone dipropionate may be related to a simpler dosing regimen (ie, once daily vs twice daily)."( Mometasone furoate versus beclomethasone dipropionate: effectiveness in patients with mild asthma.
Friedman, HS; McLaughlin, JM; Navaratnam, P; Urdaneta, E, 2010
)
2.11
" Mometasone furoate delivered through a dry powder inhaler (MF-DPI) is an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) approved for once-daily dosing in most patients."( Adherence and asthma control with mometasone furoate versus fluticasone propionate in adolescents and young adults with mild asthma.
Friedman, HS; McLaughlin, J; Navaratnam, P, 2010
)
1.55
"Differences between mometasone furoate (MF), administered once daily, and fluticasone propionate (FP), administered twice daily, dosing regimens may affect adherence and short-acting β(2) agonist (SABA) use."( Treatment with inhaled mometasone furoate reduces short-acting β(2) agonist claims and increases adherence compared to fluticasone propionate in asthma patients.
Friedman, HS; Navaratnam, P; Urdaneta, E,
)
0.77
" Although significant improvements were seen with both doses, a trend showing a dose-response effect was observed in the lung function measurements."( Efficacy and safety characteristics of mometasone furoate/formoterol fumarate fixed-dose combination in subjects with moderate to very severe COPD: findings from pooled analysis of two randomized, 52-week placebo-controlled trials.
Doherty, DE; Gates, D; Kerwin, E; Knorr, B; Matiz-Bueno, CE; Shekar, T; Staudinger, H; Tashkin, DP, 2012
)
0.65
" In a 26-week well designed trial in patients with persistent asthma uncontrolled on medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), mometasone/formoterol 200 μg/10 μg twice daily (bid) was more effective than placebo or the same nominal dosage of formoterol alone in reducing the incidence of asthma deteriorations, as well as in improving lung function, asthma control, asthma symptoms and asthma-related quality-of-life outcomes."( Mometasone/formoterol inhalation aerosol: in asthma uncontrolled on medium- or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids.
Frampton, JE, 2012
)
0.38
"Results of this study confirm the safety profile of MFNS in pediatric patients with bilateral nasal polyps over 4 months, even at double the recommended pediatric dosage for allergic rhinitis."( Safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray in the treatment of nasal polyps in children.
Chur, V; Small, CB; Stryszak, P; Teper, A, 2013
)
0.79
" Common dosage forms available on the market for those situations are lotions; however, the presence of hair limits their use."( Mometasone furoate hydrogel for scalp use: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
Marto, J; Raposo, S; Ribeiro, HM; Salgado, A; Silva, AN; Simões, S, 2014
)
1.85
" The primary assessments were TPS and regimen attributes composite satisfaction score composed of two of nine satisfaction subscales: sensory impact (including medication running out of the nose, medication running down the throat, and impact on smell and taste) and regimen management (comprised of issues relating to dosing and ability to remember to take medication)."( A patient preference and satisfaction study of ciclesonide nasal aerosol and mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis.
Berger, WE; Meltzer, EO; Prenner, B; Turner, R,
)
0.36
" Healthy subjects (n = 12) were dosed and imaged for six hours."( Regional deposition of mometasone furoate nasal spray suspension in humans.
Berger, RL; Connor, A; Gupta, P; Lin, W; McDermott, J; Monteith, D; Shah, SA,
)
0.44
"Phase I clinical studies were performed to assess the local safety and tolerability upon multiple dosing of this new cream as well as to assess the single-dose bioequivalence relative to the marketed product."( Topical safety and vasoconstrictive assay-based bioequivalence of a new reformulated mometasone cream.
Bolognese, J; Horowitz, A; Krishna, R; Larson, P; Marcantonio, EE, 2017
)
0.46
"A novel and simple ultra-performance LC method was developed for the estimation of nadifloxacin (NAD), terbinafine hydrochloride (TBH), mometasone furoate (MMF), methyl paraben (MP), and propyl paraben (PP) in a topical pharmaceutical dosage formulation."( Stability-Indicating UPLC Method for the Estimation of Nadifloxacin, Terbinafine Hydrochloride, Mometasone Furoate, Methyl Paraben, and Propyl Paraben in Topical Pharmaceutical Dosage Form.
Bhosale, DM; Nikalje, APG, 2017
)
0.88
" The developed TLC-densitometric method can be applied for identification and quantitative determination of MF in bulk drug and pharmaceutical dosage forms without any interference from excipients and degradates."( Validated Stability-Indicating Methods for Determination of Mometasone Furoate in Presence of its Alkaline Degradation Product.
El-Mammli, MY; El-Masri, MM; Hassan, WS; Sayed, RA; Shalaby, A, 2018
)
0.72
" Significant improvements in iTNSS with twice-daily GSP301 occurred by 10 minutes after dosing (-1."( Effect of olopatadine-mometasone combination nasal spray on seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms in an environmental exposure chamber study.
Patel, P; Salapatek, AM; Tantry, SK, 2019
)
0.51
"Nadifloxacin, mometasone furoate and miconazole nitrate are formulated together as a topical antifungal dosage form."( A Validated Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Nadifloxacin, Mometasone Furoate and Miconazole Nitrate in Their Combined Dosage Form and Spiked Human Plasma Samples.
Amer, SM; Elzanfaly, ES; Tarek, M; Wagdy, HA, 2020
)
1.13
"This phase 3, multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluated metered-dose inhaler twice daily (BID) dosing with MF/F 100/10 µg or MF 100 µg in children, aged 5 to 11 years, with a history of asthma for greater than or equal to 6 months and confirmed bronchodilator reversibility, who were adequately controlled on inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonist combination therapy for greater than or equal to 4 weeks."( A phase 3 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a pediatric dose of mometasone furoate with and without formoterol for persistent asthma.
Amar, NJ; Gates, D; Jain, N; Mok, W; Varnell, T; Vermeulen, JH; Weinstein, CLJ; Zhang, X, 2020
)
0.79
"Present investigation was aimed to develop aspasomal gel of Mometasone Furoate for the treatment of Psoriasis that are biologically active and deliver drug at controlled rate and decrease dosing frequency."( Mometasone furoate-loaded aspasomal gel for topical treatment of psoriasis: formulation, optimization,
Bangale, G; Desai, P; Kulkarni, D; Patel, R; Shelke, S; Shinde, G, 2022
)
2.41
"In conclusion, Mometasone furoate loaded aspasomal gel releases the drug for longer duration of time and reduce dosing frequency, providing the new dimension for the treatment of psoriasis."( Mometasone furoate-loaded aspasomal gel for topical treatment of psoriasis: formulation, optimization,
Bangale, G; Desai, P; Kulkarni, D; Patel, R; Shelke, S; Shinde, G, 2022
)
2.52
" Dose-response associations were found between increased use of potent or very potent TCSs and the risk of osteoporosis and MOF."( Association of Potent and Very Potent Topical Corticosteroids and the Risk of Osteoporosis and Major Osteoporotic Fractures.
Andersen, YMF; Egeberg, A; Hallas, J; Harsløf, T; Pottegård, A; Schwarz, P; Thyssen, JP, 2021
)
0.62
" BUD and mometasone furoate (MF) were administered as per the approved dosing regimen using pressurized metered-dose inhalers via oral inhalation route for a period of 12 weeks."( Inhaled Budesonide vis-à-vis Inhaled Mometasone in Chinese Children with Mild Persistent Asthma: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study.
Ding, Y; Gao, P; Gu, H; Yin, B, 2021
)
1.04
" Owing to low dosing frequency, MF could provide a better treatment approach than BUD due to improved patient compliance."( Inhaled Budesonide vis-à-vis Inhaled Mometasone in Chinese Children with Mild Persistent Asthma: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study.
Ding, Y; Gao, P; Gu, H; Yin, B, 2021
)
0.62
" Low plasma concentrations of 6β-hydroxy mometasone were detected after intravenous dosing (Study 1) and after multiple inhaled dosing (Study 2); mometasone was not detected in any samples."( Comparative clinical pharmacology of mometasone furoate, fluticasone propionate and fluticasone furoate.
Daley-Yates, PT; Deans, A; Mehta, R; Sousa, AR, 2022
)
0.99
" Repeat dosing of inhaled MF and FP in the therapeutic range (800 μg/day) resulted in greater systemic exposure for MF, and a 35% reduction in serum cortisol that was 2-fold greater than for FP."( Comparative clinical pharmacology of mometasone furoate, fluticasone propionate and fluticasone furoate.
Daley-Yates, PT; Deans, A; Mehta, R; Sousa, AR, 2022
)
0.99
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (2)

RoleDescription
anti-inflammatory drugA substance that reduces or suppresses inflammation.
anti-allergic agentA drug used to treat allergic reactions.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (6)

ClassDescription
2-furoate esterAny carboxylic ester where the carboxylic acid component is 2-furoic acid.
steroid ester
11beta-hydroxy steroidAny 11-hydroxy steroid in which the hydroxy group at position 11 has beta- configuration.
20-oxo steroidAn oxo steroid carrying an oxo group at position 20.
organochlorine compoundAn organochlorine compound is a compound containing at least one carbon-chlorine bond.
3-oxo-Delta(1),Delta(4)-steroidA 3-oxo-Delta(1) steroid containing an additional double bond between positions 4 and 5.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (54)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, Beta-lactamaseEscherichia coli K-12Potency10.00000.044717.8581100.0000AID485294
glp-1 receptor, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency31.62280.01846.806014.1254AID624417
hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha subunitHomo sapiens (human)Potency24.86843.189029.884159.4836AID1224846; AID1224894
RAR-related orphan receptor gammaMus musculus (house mouse)Potency11.44420.006038.004119,952.5996AID1159521; AID1159523
Fumarate hydrataseHomo sapiens (human)Potency26.35060.00308.794948.0869AID1347053
USP1 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency28.18380.031637.5844354.8130AID743255
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency13.36670.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
GLI family zinc finger 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency13.62310.000714.592883.7951AID1259369; AID1259392
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.21730.000221.22318,912.5098AID1259247; AID743035; AID743036; AID743040; AID743042; AID743053; AID743054; AID743063
caspase 7, apoptosis-related cysteine proteaseHomo sapiens (human)Potency29.84930.013326.981070.7614AID1346978
progesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.00090.000417.946075.1148AID1346784; AID1347036
isocitrate dehydrogenase 1, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency22.19696.309627.099079.4328AID602179; AID624002
cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A polypeptide 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.23020.01237.983543.2770AID1645841
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency7.98720.001310.157742.8575AID1259252; AID1259253; AID1259255; AID1259256
glucocorticoid receptor [Homo sapiens]Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.00030.000214.376460.0339AID720691; AID720692; AID720719
retinoic acid nuclear receptor alpha variant 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency29.24620.003041.611522,387.1992AID1159552; AID1159553; AID1159555
retinoid X nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency13.44810.000817.505159.3239AID1159527
estrogen-related nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency19.14630.001530.607315,848.9004AID1224841; AID1224842; AID1224848; AID1224849; AID1259401; AID1259403
farnesoid X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency26.60110.375827.485161.6524AID743220; AID743239
pregnane X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency15.53500.005428.02631,258.9301AID1346982; AID1346985
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.45460.000229.305416,493.5996AID743075; AID743080
GVesicular stomatitis virusPotency4.36490.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
cytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)Potency2.45450.00108.379861.1304AID1645840
polyproteinZika virusPotency26.35060.00308.794948.0869AID1347053
67.9K proteinVaccinia virusPotency6.68970.00018.4406100.0000AID720579; AID720580
caspase-3Homo sapiens (human)Potency29.84930.013326.981070.7614AID1346978
IDH1Homo sapiens (human)Potency16.36010.005210.865235.4813AID686970
cytochrome P450, family 19, subfamily A, polypeptide 1, isoform CRA_aHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.00030.001723.839378.1014AID743083
activating transcription factor 6Homo sapiens (human)Potency26.83250.143427.612159.8106AID1159516; AID1159519
nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group I, member 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.99530.10009.191631.6228AID1346983
Caspase-7Cricetulus griseus (Chinese hamster)Potency33.49150.006723.496068.5896AID1346980
parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptor precursorHomo sapiens (human)Potency79.43283.548119.542744.6684AID743266
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2 isoform dHomo sapiens (human)Potency5.01190.01789.637444.6684AID588834
caspase-3Cricetulus griseus (Chinese hamster)Potency33.49150.006723.496068.5896AID1346980
thyroid hormone receptor beta isoform 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency13.25310.000323.4451159.6830AID743065; AID743067
heat shock protein beta-1Homo sapiens (human)Potency29.84700.042027.378961.6448AID743210; AID743228
flap endonuclease 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency56.23410.133725.412989.1251AID588795
nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency15.55540.000627.21521,122.0200AID743202; AID743219
DNA polymerase iota isoform a (long)Homo sapiens (human)Potency17.78280.050127.073689.1251AID588590
urokinase-type plasminogen activator precursorMus musculus (house mouse)Potency8.91250.15855.287912.5893AID540303
plasminogen precursorMus musculus (house mouse)Potency8.91250.15855.287912.5893AID540303
urokinase plasminogen activator surface receptor precursorMus musculus (house mouse)Potency8.91250.15855.287912.5893AID540303
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency8.19950.004611.374133.4983AID624297
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3G isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency35.48130.058010.694926.6086AID602310
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3F isoform aHomo sapiens (human)Potency25.11890.025911.239831.6228AID602313
Interferon betaHomo sapiens (human)Potency4.36490.00339.158239.8107AID1645842
HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)Potency4.36490.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
Guanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)Potency12.58931.995325.532750.1187AID624288
Inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency4.36490.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
cytochrome P450 2C9, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency4.36490.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Glucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.00070.00010.38637.0010AID1525534
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.14810.10472.71957.0795AID977603
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.87000.08002.46889.8000AID977604
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)2.95120.05002.37979.7000AID977600
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)Ki1.62000.04401.36305.0000AID977601
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Progesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Kd0.00010.00010.00030.0004AID162459
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (101)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of autophagyInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylation of STAT proteinInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interferon-betaInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell proliferationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of viral genome replicationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of MHC class I biosynthetic processInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of Lewy body formationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T-helper 2 cell cytokine productionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
humoral immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell mediated cytotoxicityHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen via MHC class I via ER pathway, TAP-independentHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of T cell anergyHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
defense responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
detection of bacteriumHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of interleukin-12 productionHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of interleukin-6 productionHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protection from natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicityHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of dendritic cell differentiationHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen via MHC class IbHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of gluconeogenesisGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatin organizationGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromosome segregationGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
glucocorticoid metabolic processGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
gene expressionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
microglia differentiationGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adrenal gland developmentGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of glucocorticoid biosynthetic processGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, glutamatergicGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
maternal behaviorGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular glucocorticoid receptor signaling pathwayGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
glucocorticoid mediated signaling pathwayGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
astrocyte differentiationGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell divisionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mammary gland duct morphogenesisGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
motor behaviorGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to steroid hormone stimulusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucocorticoid stimulusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to dexamethasone stimulusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to transforming growth factor beta stimulusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuroinflammatory responseGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular steroid hormone receptor signaling pathwayGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
ovulation from ovarian follicleProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
glandular epithelial cell maturationProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell-cell signalingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
paracrine signalingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of phosphorylationProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
lung alveolus developmentProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of epithelial cell proliferationProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
progesterone receptor signaling pathwayProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
maintenance of protein location in nucleusProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
tertiary branching involved in mammary gland duct morphogenesisProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular steroid hormone receptor signaling pathwayProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of inflammatory response to antigenic stimulusGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
renal water homeostasisGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of insulin secretionGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucagon stimulusGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
inositol phosphate metabolic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phosphate biosynthetic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol phosphate biosynthetic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
thyroid hormone transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (51)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cytokine activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
chloramphenicol O-acetyltransferase activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
TAP bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
peptide antigen bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
TAP bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear glucocorticoid receptor activityGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
steroid bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
TBP-class protein bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Hsp90 protein bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
steroid hormone bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
estrogen response element bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription coactivator bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear steroid receptor activityProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor activityProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
steroid bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
ATPase bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
estrogen response element bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein activityGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase activator activityGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
inositol-1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol heptakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 5-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 1-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 3-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol 5-diphosphate pentakisphosphate 5-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol diphosphate tetrakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
serine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
thyroid hormone transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (32)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
extracellular spaceInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
ER to Golgi transport vesicle membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
phagocytic vesicle membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
early endosome membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
lumenal side of endoplasmic reticulum membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
MHC class I protein complexHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
centrosomeGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
spindleGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
membraneGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear speckGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synapseGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial outer membraneProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
fibrillar centerInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (86)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID540299A screen for compounds that inhibit the MenB enzyme of Mycobacterium tuberculosis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 20, Issue:21
Synthesis and SAR studies of 1,4-benzoxazine MenB inhibitors: novel antibacterial agents against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
AID588519A screen for compounds that inhibit viral RNA polymerase binding and polymerization activities2011Antiviral research, Sep, Volume: 91, Issue:3
High-throughput screening identification of poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors.
AID1347119qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347128qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347122qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347113qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347135qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347117qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347114qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347121qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347116qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347137qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for Daoy cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347125qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347118qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347136qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347112qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347141qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347127qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347139qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347109qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347140qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347126qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347110qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for A673 cells)2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347115qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347129qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347138qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D caspase screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347111qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347123qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347124qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID977602Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B3-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID977604Ki values for sodium fluorescein (10 uM) uptake in OATP1B3-transfected CHO cells2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID1525534Inhibition of glucocorticoid receptor (unknown origin)2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-27, Volume: 62, Issue:22
Why Some Targets Benefit from beyond Rule of Five Drugs.
AID576507Antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 infected in RBCs by firefly luciferase reporter gene assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Sep, Volume: 54, Issue:9
Discovery of potent small-molecule inhibitors of multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum using a novel miniaturized high-throughput luciferase-based assay.
AID588209Literature-mined public compounds from Greene et al multi-species hepatotoxicity modelling dataset2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jul-19, Volume: 23, Issue:7
Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
AID977603pIC50 values for sodium fluorescein (10 uM) uptake in OATP1B3-transfected CHO cells2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID977600pIC50 values for sodium fluorescein (10 uM) uptake in OATP1B1-transfected CHO cells2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID588210Human drug-induced liver injury (DILI) modelling dataset from Ekins et al2010Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Dec, Volume: 38, Issue:12
A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.
AID977599Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B1-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID977601Ki values for sodium fluorescein (10 uM) uptake in OATP1B1-transfected CHO cells2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID162459Dissociation constant for progesterone receptor2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-17, Volume: 47, Issue:13
Progesterone receptor ligand binding pocket flexibility: crystal structures of the norethindrone and mometasone furoate complexes.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (799)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19905 (0.63)18.7374
1990's64 (8.01)18.2507
2000's252 (31.54)29.6817
2010's347 (43.43)24.3611
2020's131 (16.40)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 107.53

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index107.53 (24.57)
Research Supply Index7.15 (2.92)
Research Growth Index5.95 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index203.13 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.07 (0.95)

This Compound (107.53)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials355 (38.88%)5.53%
Reviews101 (11.06%)6.00%
Case Studies92 (10.08%)4.05%
Observational8 (0.88%)0.25%
Other357 (39.10%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (197)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Evaluation of the Anti-inflammatory Effects of Glycopyrronium Added to Indacaterol/Mometasone on the Allergen-induced Late Asthmatic Response [NCT04259164]Phase 328 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-10Completed
A 1-Year Safety Study of Medium and High Doses of Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Combination Formulation and Medium and High Doses of Fluticasone/Salmeterol in Persistent Asthmatics Previously Treated With Medium to High Doses of Inhaled Glucocorticosteroi [NCT00379288]Phase 3404 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Nasonex vs. Placebo in Subjects With SAR and Concomitant Asthma [NCT00070707]Phase 4188 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-03Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, 12-week Treatment, Doubleblind Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of QMF149 (150/80 Microgram) Compared With MF Twisthaler® (200 Microgram) in Adult and Adolescent Patients With Asthma [NCT02892344]Phase 3802 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-16Completed
A Prospective, Randomised, Vehicle-Controlled, Double-Blind, Exploratory Clinical Trial To Assess The Efficacy And Steroid Sparing Potential Of DGLA Cream Topically Applied To Patients With Moderate To Severe Atopic Dermatitis [NCT03676036]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, 52-week, Placebo Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Dupilumab, in Patients With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis on a Background Therapy With Intranasal Corticosteroids [NCT02898454]Phase 3448 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-28Completed
A Comparison of Patients on AVAMYS ® Versus NASONEX (A Trade Mark of Schering Corporation) and FLIXONASE ® on Key Health Outcome Measures [NCT01199757]540 participants (Actual)Observational2009-07-10Completed
A Randomized, 26-Week, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study With a 26-Week Long-Term Safety Extension, of High- and Medium-Dose Inhaled Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Fixed-Dose Combination Formulation Compared With Formoterol and High-Dose Inhaled [NCT00383721]Phase 31,196 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Open Label, 12-week Clinical Trial to Assess Efficacy, Safety, Treatment Adherence and Quality of Life Impact of Mometasone Furoate Dry Powder 400 mcg Once-daily in Persistent Mild-moderate Asthmatic Patients at Least 12 Years Old [NCT00687531]Phase 4385 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Terminated
Personalized Treatment Algorithms for Difficult-to-treat Asthma: Bench to Community [NCT04179461]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-16Completed
An Exploratory, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of the Effects of Dupilumab on Airway Inflammation of Adults With Persistent Asthma [NCT02573233]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-27Completed
A Randomized, 24-Week Treatment, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Dupilumab 300 mg Every Other Week, in Patients With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis on a Background Therapy With Intranasal Corticosteroids [NCT02912468]Phase 3276 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-05Completed
A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group PhIII Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of 100 mg SC Mepolizumab as an Add on to Maintenance Treatment in Adults With Severe Bilateral Nasal Polyps - SYNAPSE (StudY in NAsal Polyps Patients to Asse [NCT03085797]Phase 3414 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-25Completed
Comparison of Daily Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray Alone Versus a Combination With Montelukast for Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Asthma After Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: a 9-month Randomized, Open-label, Controlled Study [NCT02110654]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
A Randomized, 26-Week, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study With a 26-Week Long-Term Safety Extension, of High- and Medium-Dose Inhaled Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Fixed-Dose Combination Formulation Compared With Formoterol and High-Dose Inhaled [NCT00383435]Phase 31,055 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
A 12-Week Efficacy and Safety Study of Two Doses of Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Combination Formulation Compared With Mometasone Furoate Monotherapy, in Persistent Asthmatics Previously Treated With High-Dose Inhaled Glucocorticosteroids [NCT00381485]Phase 3834 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-01Completed
A Study of the Therapeutic Equivalency of MF DPI 100 mcg and 200 mcg Inhalers in Corticosteroid-Dependent Subjects With Moderate Asthma [NCT00521599]Phase 4672 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Comparative Study of the Effect of Two Doses of Mometasone Furoate Dry Powder Inhaler 200 mcg and 400 mcg QD PM, Fluticasone Propionate 250 mcg BID, and Montelukast 10 mg QD PM, on Bone Mineral Density in Adults With Asthma [NCT00394355]Phase 4566 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Acute and Chronic Effects of Inhaled Steroids on Pulmonary Function in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury [NCT01353599]Phase 150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-08-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase III, Non-inferiority, Open-label, Multicenter and Randomized Clinical Trial About the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Persistent Allergic Rhinitis With Eurofarma Mometasone or Reference Mometasone. [NCT01372865]Phase 3364 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Efficacy of Intranasal Steroid for Children With Sleep-Disordered Breathing Non-Responsive to Initial Treatment With Intranasal Saline: A Randomized Trial [NCT05382494]Phase 4154 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-05Recruiting
A Multicenter Randomized 52 Week Treatment Double-blind, Triple Dummy Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of QMF149 Compared to Mometasone Furoate in Patients With Asthma [NCT02554786]Phase 32,216 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-29Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Long-Term Safety of Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Fumarate (MF/F, MK-0887A [SCH418131]), Compared With Mometasone Furoate (MF, MK-0887 [SCH032088]), in Chi [NCT02741271]Phase 3181 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-11Completed
An Open-Label, Comparative, Randomized, Parallel, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Two Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Used for the Application of Mometasone in the Treatment of Asthma [NCT00817817]Phase 393 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-01Completed
A Two-Part, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Trial to Evaluate the Differential Effects of Inhaled Nedocromil, Oral Montelukast, and Inhaled Mometasone on Markers of the Early Airway Response to Allergen in Asthmatics [NCT01061333]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Evaluator-Blind, Crossover, Single Dose Study of the Bronchodilator Effect of Formoterol Fumarate in Combination With Mometasone Furoate Metered Dose Inhaler Delivered With and Without a Spacer Versus Placebo and Foradil® Aerolizer® in Child [NCT01258803]Phase 292 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Use of Mometasone Eluting Stent in Choanal Atresia [NCT03605537]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-03Withdrawn(stopped due to Study terminated due to lack of funding.)
A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Multiple Dose Study to Investigate Etokimab (ANB020) in Adult Subjects With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis [NCT03614923]Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-29Completed
Evaluation of the Sensitivity of Pharmacokinetics to Differences in the Particle Size Distribution of Two Different Formulations of a Locally-acting Mometasone Furoate Suspension-based Nasal Spray [NCT02588326]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-21Completed
An Open-label, Single-Dose, Three-way Crossover Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of Fixed-Dose Combination of Mometasone + Azelastine Nasal Spray to Mometasone and Azelastine Nasal Sprays in Adolescents (12 to 17 Years of Age) and Young Adults (18 to [NCT05887843]Phase 138 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-06-08Terminated(stopped due to Business decision (no safety concerns).)
Treatment of Phimosis With Topical Steroid Cream -Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study in 98 Boys [NCT01108198]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-10-31Recruiting
A 26-Week Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Fumarate Combination Formulation Compared With Mometasone Furoate and Formoterol Monotherapy in Subjects With Persistent Asthma Previously Treated With Low-Dose Inhale [NCT00383552]Phase 3746 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Single-Site Study of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS) In Subjects With Sleep-disordered Breathing Associated With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PAR) Using Home-Monitored Cardio-Respiratory [NCT00359216]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety Study Of Benralizumab in Patients With Severe Nasal Polyposis [NCT03401229]Phase 3413 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-15Completed
Effects of the Direct Interaction Between Streptococcus Salivarius 24SMBc and Streptococcus Oralis 89a With the Respiratory Epithelium in Children Affected by Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis [NCT03449836]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-01Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Mometasone Nasal Irrigation for Chronic Rhinosinusitis [NCT03705793]Phase 453 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Completed
Study of Nasonex® for the Treatment of Nasal Polyps in Pediatric Subjects Between Ages of 6 and Less Than 18 Years Old [NCT00378378]Phase 3127 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
Comparison the Efficacy and Safety of 0.1% Tacrolimus Ointment With 0.1% Mometasone Furoate Cream in the Treatment of Adult Vitiligo: A Single Blinded Pilot Study [NCT01333410]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multi-Site Study to Compare the Clinical Equivalence of Mometasone Nasal Spray (Lek Pharmaceuticals) With NASONEX® Nasal Spray (Schering Corporation) in the Relief of the Signs and Symptoms o [NCT01038427]Phase 3795 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-02Completed
Placebo-Controlled Study of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS) 200 mcg QD in the Relief of Nasal Congestion Associated With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) [NCT00728416]Phase 3333 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Active Controlled Trial of the Safety and Tolerability of MP 03-036 (Astepro 0.15%) in Patients With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis [NCT00720382]Phase 3703 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Multi-center, Parallel Group, Double Blind, Study to Assess the Safety of QMF Twisthaler® (500/400 µg) and Mometasone Furoate Twisthaler® (400 µg) in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Persistent Asthma [NCT00941798]Phase 22,283 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Open Label Study to Assess the Effects of a Nasal Corticosteroid on the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of PMI-150 (Intranasal Ketamine Hydrochloride) 30 mg [NCT00662883]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Corticosteroid Plus Montelukast Compared With Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy Alone in Patients With Chronic Asthma [NCT00666679]Phase 2134 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Long-term Study of Mometasone Furoate in Patients With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis [NCT00732368]Phase 398 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-01Completed
A Preference Evaluation of Nasonex® Nasal Spray (Unscented) vs. Flonase® Nasal Spray (Scented) in Subjects With Symptomatic Allergic Rhinitis (AR) - Single-Dose Cross-over [NCT00783458]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-01Completed
The Pathogenic Role Of Staphylococcus Aureus And The Skin Microbiome During Flare And Resolution Of Atopic Dermatitis [NCT05578482]Phase 445 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-24Recruiting
The Efficacy of Nasal Steroids in Treatment of Otitis Media With Effusion: Acomparative Study [NCT03491098]Early Phase 160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-15Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Trial Assessing the Chronobiology of Once Daily Administration of Mometasone Furoate DPI in Patients With Asthma [NCT00835094]Phase 4216 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-01Completed
Randomized, Double-blind, Cross-over Clinical Trial to Assess Onset of Action and Efficacy of Azelastine Hydrochloride 0.15% Nasal Spray in the Treatment of Allergen-Induced Allergic Rhinitis Symptoms in an Environmental Exposure Unit in Comparison to Pla [NCT06126952]Phase 284 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-30Recruiting
Characterisation and Intervention Study in Patients With Long-term Use of Nasal Decongestants [NCT04898764]Phase 4135 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-21Recruiting
A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Trial Evaluating the Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of ESO-101 in Adult Patients With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis [NCT04849390]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-29Completed
Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Bencycloquidium Bromide Nasal Spray Alone or in Combination With Mometasone Furoate Aqueous Nasal Spray in the Treatment of Moderate-severe Persistent Allergic Rhinitis [NCT05038202]Phase 4450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-16Recruiting
Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis With Mometason Furoat Aerosol: a Randomised, Placebo-controled Phase II Study for Evaluation of Treatment Effect on Group Level Including Symtom Questionnaires [NCT02113267]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Combination slow recruitment, short shelf life for placebo and insufficient funding for further drug production (probably anyway sufficient number included).)
Role of Corticosteroid Nasal Spray in Recovery of Smell Sensation in COVID-19 Patients [NCT04484493]Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-08Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multiple-Dose Trial of Mometasone Nasal Spray, 50 μg (Mylan), Nasonex® Nasal Spray, 50 μg (MSD-US), Nasonex® Nasal Spray Suspension, 50 μg (MSD-EU) & Placebo for Treatment of the Signs & Symptoms of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis i [NCT02109185]Phase 11,307 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
A Single-Blind, Randomized, Positive-controlled Study to Compare Monotherapy With an Inhaled Corticosteroid (Mometasone) to Combination Therapy With an Inhaled Corticosteroid + a Long-Acting Bronchodilator (Advair) in Patients With Milder Persistent Asthm [NCT00461812]Phase 433 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Terminated(stopped due to by sponsor due to failure to recruit patients who had mild persistent asthma who were not already on Advair 250/50 or 500/50.)
A Phase I, Single-Center, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Topical CRx-197 Formulations in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00721331]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of 14-days Treatment With an Inhaled Dose of QMF149 (500/800) in Mild to Moderate Asthmatic Patients [NCT00605306]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of SCH 32088 vs Beclomethasone Dipropionate (Vancenase AQ) and Placebo in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis [NCT03855189]Phase 3345 participants (Actual)Interventional1993-08-23Completed
Placebo-Controlled Study of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS) 200 mcg QD in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis [NCT00453063]Phase 3426 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Phase III Randomized Double-Blind Study of Mometasone Furoate Versus Placebo in the Prevention of Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy [NCT00438659]Phase 3176 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Vitiligo and the Koebner Phenomenon (Model of Vitiligo Induction and Therapy: a Clinical and Immunological Analysis) [NCT01082393]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-16Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Grass (Phleum Pratense) Sublingual Tablet (SCH 697243) in Adult Subjects With a History of Grass Pollen Induced Rhinoconjunctivitis Wit [NCT00562159]Phase 3439 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Comparison of Methylprednisolone or Methotrexate With Standard Treatment in the Maintenance Treatment of Medically and Surgically Treated Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis [NCT04532736]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-02Completed
The PIO III Study: In-office Placement of a Steroid-Eluting Implant Immediately Following Ethmoid Sinus Surgery [NCT02687438]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Topical Corticosteroid and Bacterial Decolonization to Prevent Radiation Dermatitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Quality of Life Assessment [NCT05505214]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-09-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Study planned but never formally submitted to the IRB)
An Open-label, Two-period, Single-sequence, Crossover Study to Compare the Systemic Exposure of a Single Inhaled Dose of Mometasone Furoate (MF) When Administered Alone Via the MF Twisthaler® (TH) to a Single Inhaled Dose of QMF149 Indacaterol Acetate/MF [NCT04589663]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-07Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray With the Addition of Loratadine Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (Study No. C94-145) [NCT03855228]Phase 3704 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-03-01Completed
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study Using Subjective and Objective Measures to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS) Following Initial and Maintenance Dosing in Subjects With Allergen-Indu [NCT00491504]Phase 4310 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Placebo-Controlled Study of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS) 200 mcg QD in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis [NCT00468312]Phase 3429 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Validation of a Rhinitis Control Tool : the Rhinitis Control Scoring System (RCSS) [NCT00967967]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-03-31Suspended(stopped due to Awaiting results from sub analysis to decide if study continuesé)
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Parallel-Group Multicenter Study of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray on Sleep Disturbances and Daytime Somnolence in Subjects With Symptomatic Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis [NCT00358527]Phase 4401 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
An Open-label Study to Assess the Effects of Allergic Rhinitis and Coadministration of Mometasone or Oxymetazoline on the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Intranasal Esketamine [NCT02154334]Phase 147 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
An Exploratory Study of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray in Patients With Moderate-severe Persistent Allergic Rhinitis and Intermittent Asthma: Effects on the Quality of Life Evaluated With the Rhinasthma Questionnaire [NCT00599027]Phase 351 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Placebo-Controlled Study of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS) 200 mcg QD in the Relief of Nasal Congestion Associated With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) [NCT00733005]Phase 3324 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Placebo-Controlled Study of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS) 200 mcg QD in the Relief of Nasal Congestion Associated With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) [NCT00732381]Phase 3351 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Partially-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Two-way Crossover, Proof of Concept Study to Compare the Relative Efficacy of CRTh2 Receptor Antagonist, QAV680 Against Placebo in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis in an Environmental Exposure Chamber [NCT00784732]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Comparative Study of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray in Patients With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis [NCT00783224]Phase 3351 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
"A Comparative Study of The Efficacy and Tolerability of Maintenance Treatment of Patients With Mild/Moderate Persistent Asthma With Asmanex Twisthaler 220 mcg QD PM Versus Asmanex Placebo QD PM" [NCT00442351]Phase 426 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow Enrollment)
A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Multi-centre, 4-way Cross-over Study to Compare the Single Dose Bronchodilatory Effect of Formoterol Fumarate in Combination With Mometasone Furoate Delivered Via Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler (pMDI) to Placebo [NCT00746330]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
The Effects of Mometasone on Markers of Airway Inflammation [NCT00711165]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
"Real Life Proof-of-Concept Study to Assess the Effect of Methylcellulose as add-on Seal to the In-season Pharmacologic Rescue Treatment in Subjects With Allergic Rhinitis" [NCT02557269]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Active, not recruiting
Inhaled Mometasone to Promote Reduction in Vasoocclusive Events 2 [NCT03758950]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-29Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 200 mcg BID Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS) in the Treatment of Nasal Polyps (Protocol No. P05604) [NCT01386125]Phase 3748 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Bioequivalence of Three Mometasone Furoate 0.1% Topical Lotions [NCT00805155]80 participants (Actual)Observational2004-02-29Completed
Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray in Pediatric Subjects With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (Protocol No.P06332) [NCT01135134]Phase 3333 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Clinical Equivalency Study of Two Formulations of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray [NCT00779740]Phase 3102 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-01Completed
Monteleukast Versus Inhaled Mometasone for Treatment of Otitis Media With Effusion in Children [NCT02541760]Phase 3143 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Open Label Pilot Trial, Evaluating the Role of Nasonex in the Management of Nasal Obstruction Secondary to Adenoids Hypertrophy in Children [NCT01098071]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-01Completed
A Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study to Assess the Activity of CRx-191 in Reducing the Psoriatic Infiltrate Band Thickness in Plaque Psoriasis [NCT00557739]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Phase I, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability Profile of Topical Cream SNG100 for 14 Days of Treatment in Moderate Atopic Dermatitis Subjects. [NCT04615962]Phase 166 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-01Not yet recruiting
A Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Multi-Site Study to Compare the Therapeutic Equivalence of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray, 50 mcg (Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC) With NASONEX® Nasal Spray (Schering Corporation) in the Relief of the [NCT02125253]Phase 3811 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Preference Evaluation of Nasonex® Nasal Spray (Unscented) vs. Flonase® Nasal Spray (Scented) in Subjects With Symptomatic Allergic Rhinitis (AR) - Single-Dose Cross-over [NCT00817050]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-01Completed
Combination Therapy With Mometasone Furoate and Oxymetazoline in the Treatment of Adenoid Hypertrophy Concomitant With Allergic Rhinitis [NCT02559440]Phase 4240 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
Dose-Ranging Study of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (SCH 32088) in the Treatment of Children (Ages 6-11) With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (Protocol C95-161) [NCT03879772]Phase 3679 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-03-12Completed
Phase III, National, Multicenter, Randomized, Single-blind, Non-inferiority to Compare the Efficacy of Mometasone Nasal Gel Compared to Mometasone Nasal Spray in the Treatment of Persistent or Intermittent Allergic Rhinitis in Childrens [NCT02953366]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor decision)
An Open-label, Comparative, Randomized, Parallel, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Two Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Used for the Application of Mometasone in the Treatment of Asthma [NCT00975741]Phase 397 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of New Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray Formulation in Acute Rhinosinusitis Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT05639959]20 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2022-09-10Completed
Efficacy and Cost Analysis of Steroids in Treatment of Otitis Media With Effusion (OME) Compared to That of Combination of Antibiotic, Antihistaminic, and Nasal Decongestant [NCT03590912]Phase 4160 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-05Completed
An Open-Label, Multi-Center, Patient Handling Study of Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Fumarate MDI With an Integrated Dose Counter in Adolescent and Adult Subjects and Adult With Asthma or COPD [NCT00604500]Phase 3272 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-01Completed
A Phase I, Single-Center, Randomized, Vehicle and Active-Controlled Study to Assess and Compare the Atrophy-Causing Potential of Topical CRx-191 Formulations in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00544687]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Mometasone Furoate Aqueous Nasal Spray vs Placebo and Flonase® (Fluticasone Propionate) in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Patients (I94-001) [NCT03882047]Phase 3313 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-08-11Completed
A 52-Week Efficacy and Safety Non-Inferiority Study of Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol 250/50mcg BID Delivered by Dry Powder Inhaler (Diskus) Versus Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Fumarate 200/10mcg BID Delivered by Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler in Pe [NCT00424008]Phase 3722 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Potential for Cortisol Suppression With the Use of High Volume Nasal Mometasone Irrigations in Varying Dosages. [NCT03979209]Phase 145 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-23Active, not recruiting
A 26-Week Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Fumarate Combination Formulation Compared With Mometasone Furoate and Formoterol Monotherapy in Subjects With Persistent Asthma Previously Treated With Medium-Dose Inh [NCT00383240]Phase 3781 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Open Label, Active Controlled (Mometasone Furoate Aqueous Nasal Spray [Nasonex®] 200mcg QD), Parallel Group, Multi-Center, 52-Week Study to Assess the Long Term Safety of GW685698X Aqueous Nasal Spray 100mcg QD Via Nasal Biopsy in Subjects 1 [NCT00224523]Phase 3125 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active Controlled Parallel-group Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Fixed Combination Medicinal Product Mometasone Furoate + Azelastine Hydrochloride Nasal Spray (50 + 140 mcg) in the Treatm [NCT05311475]Phase 3669 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-04-04Completed
A Comparison of Mometasone Furoate DPI Versus Budesonide DPI in Mild Persistent and Moderate Persistent Asthmatic Patients [NCT00442117]Phase 3180 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Onset of Action of Mometasone Furoate (SCH 32088) Nasal Spray 50 mcg/Spray vs Placebo in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (Study No. C93-184). [NCT03861559]Phase 3201 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-03-30Completed
A Study of Long-term (12-24 Weeks) Administration of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray in Pediatric Subjects With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (Protocol No. P06333) [NCT01165424]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Study of Asthma and Nasal Steroids for the American Lung Association-Airways Clinical Research Centers [NCT01118312]Phase 4388 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Nasonex® Nasal Suspension 50 μg Long-term Designated Drug Use Investigation [NCT00903721]3,806 participants (Actual)Observational2008-11-30Completed
Dose Finding and Dose Regimen Study of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray in Perennial Allergic Rhinitis [NCT00779545]Phase 2455 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-08Completed
A Multicenter Study of Establishing the Multi-disciplinary Cooperative Diagnosis and Treatment Process and Evaluation System for Children With Sleep Disordered Breathing and Malocclusion [NCT03451318]400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-02Recruiting
A 12-Week Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Mometasone Furoate Monotherapy in Subjects With Persistent Asthma Previously Treated With Low-Dose Inhaled Glucocorticosteroids [NCT01026870]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Withdrawn
Intranasal Steroids for the Treatment of Nocturnal Enuresis With Associated Obstructive Sleep Apnea [NCT01861145]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Unable to sufficiently enroll or collect follow-up)
Phase III, National, Multicenter, Randomized, Single-blind, Non-inferiority to Compare the Efficacy of Mometasone Nasal Gel Compared to Mometasone Nasal Spray in the Treatment of Persistent or Intermittent Allergic Rhinitis in Adults [NCT02953379]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor decision)
Psychometric Evaluation of a Novel Questionnaire Designed to Assess Patient Satisfaction With and Preference of Intranasal Corticosteroids Administered Via HFA Aerosol or Aqueous Suspension Used for the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis [NCT01287364]Phase 3185 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Mometasone Furoate 0.1% Versus Eucerin on Moderate to Severe Skin Toxicities in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Postmastectomy Radiation:A Randomized Trial, Double Blind Trial [NCT01856543]Phase 3143 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
CLINICAL EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF ASSOCIATION MOMETASONE FUROATE 0.1% AND SALICYLIC ACID 5% COMPARED WITH 0.1% MOMETASONE FUROATE INSULATED TOPICAL USE OF LABORATORY Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIASIS IN PLATE [NCT01228656]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Suspended
Phase IV Clinical Study,Comparative, Blind Double and Randomized to Compare Mometasone Furoate Cream (TOPISON) Versus Other Two Cream Mometasone Furoate, in Participants With Atopic Dermatitis [NCT04271007]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-23Completed
Efficacy and Safety of 200 mcg QD or 200 mcg BID Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS) vs Amoxicillin vs Placebo as Primary Treatment of Subjects With Acute Rhinosinusitis [NCT00750750]Phase 2981 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-01Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Phase Ⅲ Study of Mometasone Furoate/Azelastine Hydrochloride Combination Group and Mometasone Furoate and Azelastine Hydrochloride Group 4 Weeks After Treatment, Each Treatment Group Comparisons for Evaluation of Ef [NCT01470053]Phase 3347 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Efficacy of Tofacitinib in Vitiligo-a Randomized Controlled Trial in a Selected Tertiary Level Hospital in Dhaka [NCT05293119]Early Phase 180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-30Not yet recruiting
Acute Effect of Mometasone Furoate DPI on Beta-adrenergic Airway and Airway Vascular Relaxation in Moderately Severe Asthma [NCT01210170]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open Label, Two Period, Randomized, Cross Over Scintigraphy Study Assessing Nasal Deposition of a Single Dose of a Ciclesonide Radiolabeled Solution Following Nasal Inhalation of a Novel Nasal Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) and of a Mometasone Furo [NCT01371786]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
A 26-Week Randomized, Double-Blinded, Active Controlled Study Comparing the Safety of Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Fumarate MDI Fixed Dose Combination Versus Mometasone Furoate MDI Monotherapy in Adolescents and Adults With Persistent Asthma (Protocol No [NCT01471340]Phase 411,744 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-09Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Multi-Site Study to Compare the Clinical Equivalence of Mometasone Furoate Anhydrous, 50 Mcg/Actuation Nasal Spray (Teva Pharmaceuticals USA) Compared to Nasonex® (Mometasone Furoate Monohydr [NCT01523236]Phase 1/Phase 2800 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
An Exploratory Safety Study of 480 Biomedical Sinus Drug Depot in Adult Subjects With Chronic Sinusitis [NCT02967731]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-06Completed
Treatment of Olfactory Dysfunction in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis [NCT00361439]Phase 417 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Study stopped early due to slow accrual.)
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double Dummy, Placebo and Active Controlled Crossover Study, to Investigate the 24 Hour FEV1 Profile of a Single Dose of QMF TWISTHALER Device in Adult Patients With Persistent Asthma [NCT00557440]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Efficacy of Azelastine and Mometasone Irrigation in Comparison to Nasal Sprays in Patients With Chronic Rhinitis [NCT05626621]Phase 481 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-23Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Carbon Dioxide(CO2)Fractional Laser Combined With Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Female Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus [NCT05228483]134 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-23Recruiting
Stress and Treatment Response in Puerto Rican Children With Asthma [NCT03134755]249 participants (Actual)Observational2018-05-15Completed
Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial, Evaluating the Role of Nasonex® in the Management of Nasal Obstruction Secondary to Adenoids Hypertrophy in Children [NCT00553891]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to No enrollment because of war in the study country.)
A Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of the Steroid-Releasing S8 Sinus Implant When Used in Post-Sinus Surgery Patients With Recurrent Sinus Polyps [NCT01894503]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
An Open-label Study to Identify Molecular Markers of Steroid Resistance in Nasal Polyposis Before and Following Treatment With Mometasone Furoate (MFNS) 2 Sprays/Nostril (100 mcg/Nostril) Twice Daily for 4 Weeks. [NCT01616160]Phase 411 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Inability to recruit additional subjects.)
Camillian Saint Mary's Hospital Luodong [NCT05348148]450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-16Recruiting
[NCT00236106]Phase 420 participants Interventional2005-02-28Completed
A Comparison Between Local Anesthetics and Topical Cortikosteroids That is Applied to the Area of Cuff of Tracheal Intubation Tube in Pediatric Patients [NCT04085744]91 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-01Completed
A Randomized, Single Dose, 3-Period Crossover Study to Evaluate the Dosage Form Proportionality, Dose Proportionality and Pharmacokinetics of Mometasone Furoate and Formoterol Fumarate From Three Combination MDI Formulations [NCT00418509]Phase 124 participants Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Onset and Duration of Action of Mometasone Inhalation Powder as Measured by Oscillometry Versus Spirometry [NCT01635088]Phase 421 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Does the Response to a Nasal Decongestant Test Predict the Outcome to Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis With Nasonex? [NCT00618332]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND, CONTROLLED, CLINICAL STUDY TO DEMONSTRATE THE THERAPEUTIC CLINICAL EQUIVALENCE OF TWO MOMETASONE NASAL SPRAYS IN THE RELIEF OF THE SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF PERENNIAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS. [NCT01702103]Phase 3360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-10-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Brensocatib in Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps - The BiRCh Study [NCT06013241]Phase 2270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-30Recruiting
The PROGRESS Study: Safety and Efficacy of the Propel Mini and Propel Nova Steroid-Eluting Sinus Implants Following Surgical Opening of the Frontal Sinus for Chronic Sinusitis: A Randomized Blinded Controlled Study [NCT02266810]Phase 3160 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
An Exploratory, Multi-centre, Double-blind, Placebocontrolled Crossover Study, to Investigate the Bronchodilatory Efficacy of a Single Dose of Indacaterol in Fixed Combination With Mometasone Furoate Delivered Via a MDDPI (Twisthaler®) in Adult Patients W [NCT00556673]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the Steroid-Releasing S8 Sinus Implant Used in Post-Sinus Surgery Patients With Recurrent Sinus Obstruction [NCT01732536]Phase 2/Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Concurrent Administration of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS) and Oxymetazoline Nasal Spray Administered Once Daily (QD) vs. Oxymetazoline Twice Daily (BID), Mometasone Furoate QD, and Placebo in the Treatment of Subjects With [NCT00552110]Phase 2707 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Immunotherapy With SCH 697243 (Phleum Pratense) in Children 5 to <18 Years of Age With a History of Grass Pollen Induced Rhinoconjunctivi [NCT00550550]Phase 3345 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Double-blind Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Parallel-group, Multicenter Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray in Children With Adenoid Hypertrophy SNORE Study [NCT00552032]Phase 3132 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-01Completed
Replication of the P04334 Asthma Trial in Healthcare Claims Data [NCT04892758]10,288 participants (Actual)Observational2020-10-29Completed
Role of Lung Function, Airway Inflammation and Bronchial Hyper Reactivity for Exercise Capacity in Well-trained Individuals [NCT06077019]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-05Recruiting
A Clinical Evaluation of Propel Mini Sinus Implant Placement in the Frontal Sinus Ostia Following In-office Dilation [NCT02880514]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Completed
A 2-Week Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study Comparing the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Low, Medium, and High Dose Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Fumarate MDI Formulation and Medium Dose Mometasone Furoate DPI and MDI Formulations in Adu [NCT00635882]Phase 293 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Assessment of the Effectiveness of Regular Use of Intranasal Steroids in Alleviating Nasal Symptoms in Allergic Rhinitis When Used Alone or in Combination With Oral Antihistamine [NCT00834119]Phase 472 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-01Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Fixed Dose Combination GSP 301 Nasal Spray (NS) Compared With Placebo Nasal Spray and Individual Monotherapy Formulations (Comparators) in [NCT02631551]Phase 31,180 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Improving Asthma Control in the Real World: A Systematic Approach to Improving Dulera Adherence [NCT02045875]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-04Completed
A Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel-group, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Two Different Strengths and Regimens of a Fixed Dose Combination GSP 301 Nasal Spray Compared With Placebo Nasal Spray and Individual Monoth [NCT02318303]Phase 21,111 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Role of Short Term Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy in the Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps [NCT01676415]Phase 49 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Terminated(stopped due to participants are no longer receiving intervention due to clinical logistics)
An Open-Label Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Zenhale® (a Fixed-Dose Combination of Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Fumarate Delivered by Metered Dose Inhaler) in 40 Subjects With Persistent Asthma (Protocol No. 206-00 [P08212]) [NCT01566149]Phase 349 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
A Phase 2A, Single-Center, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Assess the Efficacy of an Anti-Inflammatory Agent in Patients With Sinusitis [NCT02874144]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-20Completed
The Role of Nonspecific Immune Response of the Airway Mucosa in Children With Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Asthma [NCT03011632]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
Steroids In Eosinophil Negative Asthma [NCT02066298]Phase 3295 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
The Efficacy Of Rhinophototherapy Compared To Intranasal Corticosteroids On The Nasal Mucosa Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients [NCT05919316]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-04Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, 4-week Treatment, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Mometasone Furoate Delivered Via Concept1 or Twisthaler® in Adult and Adolescent Patients With Persistent Asthma [NCT01555151]Phase 2739 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Evaluation of Mechanism(s)Limiting Expiratory Airflow in Chronic, Stable Asthmatics Who Are Non-smokers [NCT00576069]60 participants (Anticipated)Observational2007-10-25Recruiting
A 12-Week, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging, Efficacy and Safety Study of Mometasone Furoate Metered Dose Inhaler in the Treatment of Children Ages 5 to 11 Years With Persistent Asthma (Phase 2; Protocol No. P04223AM3) [NCT01502371]Phase 2583 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-25Completed
Effect of Inhaled Mometasone/Formoterol Versus Inhaled Fluticasone/Salmeterol on Peripheral Airway Function in Asthma Patients [NCT02415179]52 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Anti-IL4/IL13 Therapy With Dupilumab for Prevention of Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for CRSwNP [NCT04596189]Phase 436 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-25Recruiting
Inhaled Mometasone to Promote Reduction in Vasoocclusive Events [NCT02061202]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
Elocon vs Fluticasone in Localized Psoriasis [NCT00763529]Phase 4245 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-01Completed
The Efficacy Of Elonide Nasal Corticosteroids In Managing Allergic Rhinitis [NCT05912192]163 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-02-24Completed
Randomized Controled Double-blinded Study Comparing Mometasone Nasal Spray to Budesonide Irrigations in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis [NCT03323866]Phase 336 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-01Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty with recruitment)
Periostin-guided Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients With Non-eosinophilic Asthma [NCT03141424]Phase 4110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-01Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 12-week Treatment, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Indacaterol Acetate (75 and 150 µg o.d.) in Patients With Persistent Asthma [NCT01609478]Phase 2335 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Single-Site Study Of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS) In Subjects With Mild-Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome (OSAHS) Associated With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PAR) Us [NCT00491374]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Very poor enrollment)
A Randomized Two Period Two-Way Crossover Study To Evaluate Patient Preference, Satisfaction And Efficacy Of A Nasal Aerosol Versus An Aqueous Nasal Spray Used For The Treatment Of Allergic Rhinitis [NCT01401465]Phase 3327 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2, Placebo Controlled, 2 Arm Study To Evaluate Dupilumab In Patients With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis And Chronic Symptoms Of Sinusitis [NCT01920893]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A One-year Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the House Dust Mite Sublingual Allergen Immunotherapy Tablet (SCH 900237/MK 8237) in Children and Adult Subjects With House Dust Mite-Induced Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis W [NCT01700192]Phase 31,482 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of 200 mcg QD or 200 mcg BID Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS) vs Amoxicillin vs Placebo as Primary Treatment of Subjects With Acute Rhinosinusitis [NCT00751075]Phase 3981 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-01Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study on Efficacy and Safety of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS) in the Post Surgical Treatment of Nasal Polyposis [NCT00731185]Phase 3162 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-01Completed
Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Valproate -Loaded Nanospanlastics in Patients With Patchy Alopecia Areata in Comparison to Conventional Therapy With Topical Steroids: a Randomized Controlled Study, With Clinical, Dermoscopic and Molecular Ases [NCT05017454]Early Phase 167 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-01Completed
National, Multicenter, Randomized, Simple-blind, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Magnólia Nasal Gel in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis in Participants With Age Greater Than or Equal to 12 Years. [NCT04670653]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-08-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor decision)
Mometasone Furoate Cream Reduces Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas' Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy [NCT02495064]Phase 4160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-31Recruiting
Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of AKST4290 for Adjunctive Treatment of Mild to Moderate Bullous Pemphigoid [NCT04499235]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-30Terminated(stopped due to The study was prematurely terminated by the Sponsor due to operational challenges stemming from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, treatment limitations, rarity of the disease, and drug supply considerations.)
[NCT01673659]Phase 31,220 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intranasal Mometasone in Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Due to Adenotonsillar Hypertrophy [NCT01671852]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Could not obtain funding.)
A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of MK-3641, a Ragweed (Ambrosia Artemisiifolia) Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablet, in Children With a History of Ragweed-Induced Rhinoconjunctivitis With or Without [NCT02478398]Phase 31,025 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-20Completed
Xenon MRI Probing vEntilation Response to Triple Therapy (QVM149) [NCT04206761]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-01Withdrawn(stopped due to issues related to Covid-19 restrictions/shutdowns)
Establishment of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment System for Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis [NCT05390255]Phase 387 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-25Recruiting
[NCT01850823]Phase 3880 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Multicenter Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Concomitant Mometasone Furoate and Levocabastine HCl in Perennial Allergic Rhinitis Patients [NCT02498509]Phase 3459 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Onset of Action of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray vs. Placebo in Induced Allergic Rhinitis [NCT00783237]Phase 4340 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-01Completed
A Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the Steroid-Releasing S8 Sinus Implant in Chronic Sinusitis Patients With Recurrent Sinus Obstruction [NCT02291549]Phase 3300 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
The EXCEED Study: A Clinical Evaluation of the Drug-Eluting Propel Nova Sinus Implant When Placed in Peripheral Sinus Ostia to Maintain Patency [NCT02228720]15 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Nighttime Awakenings Due to Asthma
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Chest Tightness Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Cough Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Difficulty Breathing Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Nasal Congestion Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Nasal Itching Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Nasal Sneezing Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Rhinorrhea Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Total Nasal Symptom Severity (TNSS)
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM and PM Wheeze Symptom Score
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) Between 25% and 75% of the Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%)
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Total Asthma Symptom Severity (TASS)
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Auscultation/Wheezing Assessment
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Number of Puffs of Albuterol/Salbutamol Used
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Interference With Daily Activities
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Interference With Sleep
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Therapeutic Response to SAR Nasal Symptoms
NCT00070707 (21) [back to overview]Therapeutic Response to Asthma Symptoms
NCT00358527 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change of the AM-PRIOR-reflective (Participant's Status Over the Previous 12 Hours) Total Nasal Symptoms Severity Score (TNSS) Averaged Over the Last 7 Days of Treatment From the Baseline Score.
NCT00358527 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline (Day 1/Visit 3) in the Sleep Problems Index II (SLP9) Score From the Medical Outcome Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at the Day 29 Visit.
NCT00359216 (1) [back to overview]Apnea-Hypopnea Index
NCT00361439 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow at 2 Weeks
NCT00361439 (4) [back to overview]Histological Findings
NCT00361439 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score at 2 Weeks
NCT00361439 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percentage of Eosinophils at 2 Weeks
NCT00378378 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline 24-hour Urinary Free Cortisol Level Corrected for Creatinine
NCT00378378 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline 24-hour Urinary Free Cortisol Level
NCT00379288 (1) [back to overview]The Number of All Randomized Subjects Reporting Adverse Events (AEs).
NCT00381485 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proportion of Nights Across the Treatment Period With Nocturnal Awakenings Due to Asthma That Require Use of Short-Acting Beta Agonists (SABA)
NCT00381485 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ[S]) Total Score
NCT00381485 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Total Score
NCT00381485 (4) [back to overview]Mean Area Under the Time Curve From 0 to 12 Hours (AUC(0-12 Hours)) of Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Forced Expiratory Volume (Liters) in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT00383240 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ[S]) Total Score
NCT00383240 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score
NCT00383240 (6) [back to overview]Mean Area Under the Time Curve From 0 to 12 Hours (AUC(0-12 Hours)) of Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Forced Expiratory Volume (Liters) in 1 Second (FEV1) for MF/F Versus MF
NCT00383240 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least One Severe Asthma Exacerbation
NCT00383240 (6) [back to overview]Time-to-first Asthma Exacerbation Over the 26-week Treatment Period for the Comparison of MF/F Versus F
NCT00383240 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proportion of Nights Across the Treatment Period With Nocturnal Awakenings Due to Asthma Which Require Use of Short-acting Beta 2-agonist (SABA)
NCT00383435 (6) [back to overview]Mean Area Under the Time Curve From 0 to 12 Hours (AUC(0-12 Hours)) of Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Forced Expiratory Volume (Liters) in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT00383435 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Week 13 Endpoint in AM Predose FEV1
NCT00383435 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Mild, Moderate, or Severe COPD Exacerbations
NCT00383435 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Partly Stable COPD
NCT00383435 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proportion of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Symptom-Free Nights (AM Diary Symptoms)
NCT00383435 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in St George's Respiratory Questionaire (SGRQ) Total Score
NCT00383552 (8) [back to overview]AUC(0-12 Hour) of the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in FEV1 for Each Body Mass Index (BMI) Subgroup
NCT00383552 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM FEV1 Pre-dose Assessment, or Trough FEV1, at Week 12
NCT00383552 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proportion of Nights Across the Treatment Period With Nocturnal Awakenings Due to Asthma Which Require Use of Short-acting Beta Agonists (SABA)
NCT00383552 (8) [back to overview]Mean Area Under the Time Curve From 0 to 12 Hours (AUC(0-12 Hours)) of Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Forced Expiratory Volume (Liters) in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT00383552 (8) [back to overview]Median Time-to-first Severe Asthma Exacerbation Over the 26-week Treatment Period
NCT00383552 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standarized Activities (AQLQ[S]) Total Score
NCT00383552 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least One Severe Asthma Exacerbation at Week 26
NCT00383552 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Total Score
NCT00383721 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Partly Stable COPD
NCT00383721 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proportion of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Symptom-Free Nights (AM Diary Symptoms)
NCT00383721 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in St George's Respiratory Questionaire (SGRQ) Total Score
NCT00383721 (6) [back to overview]Mean Area Under the Time Curve From 0 to 12 Hours (AUC(0-12 Hours)) of Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Forced Expiratory Volume (Liters) in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT00383721 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Mild, Moderate, or Severe COPD Exacerbations
NCT00383721 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Week 13 Endpoint in AM Predose FEV1
NCT00394355 (4) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in the Left Total Femur From the Averaged Baseline Value to the Averaged Value at the Endpoint of Treatment Time Point
NCT00394355 (4) [back to overview]Summary of Change From Baseline to Endpoint in FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second).
NCT00394355 (4) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From the Averaged Baseline Value to the Endpoint of Treatment Time Point
NCT00394355 (4) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in the Femoral Neck BMD From the Averaged Baseline Value to the Averaged Value at the Endpoint of Treatment Time Point
NCT00424008 (4) [back to overview]Onset-of-action Based on Change From Baseline FEV1 at the 5 Min Pulmonary Function Test (PFT) Assessment on Day 1
NCT00424008 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Total Score at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT00424008 (4) [back to overview]The Proportion of Symptom-free Days and Nights (Combined) Over the 12-week Treatment Period.
NCT00424008 (4) [back to overview]The Area Under the Curve From 0 to 12 Hours [AUC](0-12 hr) of the Change From Baseline to the Week 12 Endpoint in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
NCT00438659 (8) [back to overview]Skin Toxicity as Measured by a Dermatologic Quality-of-life Instrument (Skindex-16).
NCT00438659 (8) [back to overview]Adverse Events Assessed Clinically by NCI CTCAE v3.0
NCT00438659 (8) [back to overview]Adverse Events Reported by the Patient in the Symptom Experience Diary (SED).
NCT00438659 (8) [back to overview]Incidence of Severe ( Grade >=3) Radiation Dermatitis
NCT00438659 (8) [back to overview]QOL Domains as Measured by LASA
NCT00438659 (8) [back to overview]Skin Toxicity as Measured by the Skin Toxicity Assessment Tool
NCT00438659 (8) [back to overview]Overall Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by Linear Analogue Self-Assessment (LASA)
NCT00438659 (8) [back to overview]Mean Maximum Grade of Radiation Dermatitis by Treatment Arm.
NCT00442117 (4) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change of AM PEFR (Peak Exploratory Flow Rate) From Baseline to Week 12.
NCT00442117 (4) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change of FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) From Baseline to Week 12.
NCT00442117 (4) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change of Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) From Baseline to Week 12.
NCT00442117 (4) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change of Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) at (25-75% Interval) From Baseline to Week 12.
NCT00453063 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total Score at Endpoint (Last Post Baseline Evaluation Carried Forward)
NCT00453063 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Average AM Instantaneous (NOW) Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Averaged Over Days 2 to 15
NCT00453063 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM NOW Nasal Congestion Score Averaged Over Days 2 to 15
NCT00453063 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) Averaged Over Days 2 to 15
NCT00453063 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Average AM Instantaneous (NOW) Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) Averaged Over Days 2 to 15
NCT00468312 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average AM Instantaneous (NOW) Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) Averaged Over Days 2 to 15
NCT00468312 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total Score at Endpoint (Last Post Baseline Evaluation Carried Forward)
NCT00468312 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM NOW Nasal Congestion Score Averaged Over Days 2 to 15
NCT00468312 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) Averaged Over Days 2 to 15
NCT00468312 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average AM Instantaneous (NOW) Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Averaged Over Days 2 to 15
NCT00491374 (1) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in the Number of Apnea-hypopnea Episodes Per Hour (Apnea-hypopnea Index (AHI)
NCT00491504 (1) [back to overview]Changes in the Total Nasal Symptom Severity Score (TNSS) at 6 Hours After Dosage Administration on Day 1
NCT00521599 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Average AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 7 Days of Week 8.
NCT00550550 (4) [back to overview]Participant Total Combined Symptom (TCS) Score Over the Entire Grass Pollen Season (GPS)
NCT00550550 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Scores (DSS) Over the Entire GPS
NCT00550550 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Weekly Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total Score Over the Entire GPS
NCT00550550 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) Over the Entire GPS
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Bilateral Tympanogram Results of: Normal, Abnormal, or Not Done
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Rhinomanometry Results- Left and Right Nasal Fossa: Expiratory Resistance
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Otoscopic Results of: Normal or Abnormal
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Acoustic Rhinometry Results- Minimal Cross-Sectional Area: Left and Right Nasal Fossa
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Total Severity Symptom Scores: Morning and Evening (AM & PM)
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Total Frequency Symptom Scores: AM & PM
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Rhinomanometry Results- Left and Right Nasal Fossa: Inspiratory Resistance
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Rhinomanometry Results- Left and Right Nasal Fossa: Inspiration Flow at 75 Pa
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Rhinomanometry Results- Left and Right Nasal Fossa: Expiratory Flow at 75 Pa
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Total Score (Ages 8-12)
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Acoustic Rhinometry Results- Nasopharyngeal Volume (NPV): Left and Right Nasal Fossa
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Total Score (Ages 2-4)
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Obstructive Sleep Apnea-18 (OSA-18) Questionnaire Total Score
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Rhinoscopic-Inferior Turbinates Results of: Normal, Hypertrophic, and Hypotrophic
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Rhinoscopic- Septum Results of: Aligned, Non-Obstructive, or Obstructive Deviation
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Rhinoscopic- Middle Meatus Results of: Patent, Partial Obstruction or Total Obstruction
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Pure-Tone Audiometric Results of: Normal, Abnormal, or Not Done
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ)- Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Results of: Mild, Moderate, or Severe
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Adenoid/Choana (A/C) Index Grade
NCT00552032 (20) [back to overview]Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Total Score (Ages 5-7)
NCT00552110 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM/PM Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (NOW TNSS) Averaged Over Days 1 to 15
NCT00552110 (2) [back to overview]Standardized Area Under the Curve From 0 to 4 Hours [AUC(0-4 hr)] of the Change From Baseline to Hour 4 on Day 1 in Nasal Congestion Score
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Period Baseline in Peak Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Period Baseline in Trough FEV1/FVC Ratio
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Period Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Period Baseline in Trough Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Period Baseline to 24 Hour Post-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Maximum (Peak) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Indacaterol
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Maximum (Peak) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mometasone Furoate
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Concentration Following Drug Administration for Mometasone Furoate
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 12 Hours Post-dose for Mometasone Furoate
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Indacaterol
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Mometasone Furoate
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Period Baseline in Peak FEV1/FVC Ratio
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Change From Period Baseline in Peak Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT00556673 (15) [back to overview]Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Concentration Following Drug Administration for Indacaterol
NCT00557440 (5) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) Between Baseline (Pre-dose) and 24 Hours Post-dose
NCT00557440 (5) [back to overview]Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Single Time Points
NCT00557440 (5) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Single Time Points
NCT00557440 (5) [back to overview]Change From Period Baseline to 24 Hour Post-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT00557440 (5) [back to overview]Time to Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT00562159 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Weekly Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (RQLQ(S)) Total Score Over the Entire GPS
NCT00562159 (4) [back to overview]Participant Total Combined Symptom (TCS) Score Over the Entire Grass Pollen Season (GPS)
NCT00562159 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) Over the Entire GPS
NCT00562159 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS) Over the Entire GPS
NCT00599027 (1) [back to overview]The Change of the Rhinasthma Global Summary Score From Baseline to Endpoint After 28 Days of Treatment.
NCT00604500 (4) [back to overview]End of Use Agreement: Number of Inhalers With an End of Use Agreement of 0 (Completer Population)
NCT00604500 (4) [back to overview]Overall Quartile Discrepancy Rate
NCT00604500 (4) [back to overview]Overall Discrepancy Size
NCT00604500 (4) [back to overview]Overall Discrepancy Rate
NCT00605306 (4) [back to overview]Levels of Plasma Glucose Over Time
NCT00605306 (4) [back to overview]Levels of Serum Cortisol Over Time
NCT00605306 (4) [back to overview]Levels of Serum Potassium Over Time
NCT00605306 (4) [back to overview]Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00618332 (9) [back to overview]Changes in RQLQ: Non-Nasal/Eye
NCT00618332 (9) [back to overview]Changes in RQLQ: Eye
NCT00618332 (9) [back to overview]Changes in RQLQ: Emotional
NCT00618332 (9) [back to overview]Changes in RQLQ: Activity
NCT00618332 (9) [back to overview]Changes in RQLQ: Nasal
NCT00618332 (9) [back to overview]Global Assessment
NCT00618332 (9) [back to overview]Changes in RQLQ: Sleep
NCT00618332 (9) [back to overview]Changes in RQLQ: Practical
NCT00618332 (9) [back to overview]Changes in RQLQ: Overall
NCT00635882 (9) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol Challenge
NCT00635882 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15
NCT00635882 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15
NCT00635882 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15
NCT00635882 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15
NCT00635882 (9) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Sputum Eosinophil Count (Percentage)
NCT00635882 (9) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)
NCT00635882 (9) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 7 in eNO Ppb
NCT00635882 (9) [back to overview]Baseline Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)
NCT00666679 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Days With Asthma Control
NCT00666679 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume; Volume of Air That is Exhaled During the First Second of a Forced Exhalation)
NCT00666679 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Nighttime Asthma Symptom Score
NCT00666679 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume; Volume of Air That is Exhaled During the First Second of a Forced Exhalation) in Patients Who Met Lung Function Eligibility Criteria Specifically at the Randomization Visit.
NCT00666679 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Daily β-agonist Use
NCT00666679 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Daytime Asthma Symptom Score
NCT00666679 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Peripheral Blood Eosinophils
NCT00666679 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Days With Asthma Exacerbations
NCT00687531 (4) [back to overview]Number of Items in the Asthma Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire and the General QOL Questionnaire That Had a Significant (Positive) Change From Baseline to Endpoint
NCT00687531 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Adhered to Treatment
NCT00687531 (4) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT00687531 (4) [back to overview]Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
NCT00720382 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams to 12 Months
NCT00720382 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Months in the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Compared to Placebo in Subjects 18 Years of Age and Older
NCT00720382 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams to 12 Months
NCT00728416 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average AM/PM PRIOR Nasal Congestion Score Over 15 Days
NCT00728416 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average AM/PM PRIOR Total Nasal Symptom Score Over 15 Days
NCT00732381 (2) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in Average AM/PM PRIOR Nasal Congestion Score Over 15 Days
NCT00732381 (2) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in Average AM/PM PRIOR Total Nasal Symptom Score Over 15 Days
NCT00733005 (2) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in Average AM/PM PRIOR Total Nasal Symptom Score Over 15 Days
NCT00733005 (2) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in Average AM/PM PRIOR Nasal Congestion Score Over 15 Days.
NCT00746330 (6) [back to overview]Plasma Formoterol Concentrations (Pmol/L) Following a Single Dose of Formoterol Fumarate Alone and in Combination With Mometasone Furoate Via the pMDI and Formoterol Fumarate Via the Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI)
NCT00746330 (6) [back to overview]The Standardized Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Using Area Under the Curve (AUC) From 0 to 12 Hours (0-12h) Post-dose by Treatment
NCT00746330 (6) [back to overview]Serial FEV1 Measurement (i.e. at 5, 30 Minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 Hours Post-dose) Following Inhalation of a Single Dose of Study Medication to Evaluate the Onset and Duration of the Bronchodilatory Effect
NCT00746330 (6) [back to overview]Serial Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Measurement (i.e. at 5, 30 Minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 Hours Post-dose) Following Inhalation of a Single Dose of Study Medication to Evaluate the Onset and Duration of the Bronchodilatory Effect
NCT00746330 (6) [back to overview]Serial Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEF) Measurement (i.e. at 5, 30 Minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 Hours Post-dose) Following Inhalation of a Single Dose of Study Medication to Evaluate the Onset and Duration of the Bronchodilatory Effect
NCT00746330 (6) [back to overview]Urinary Excretion of Formoterol Following a Single Dose of Formoterol Fumarate Alone and in Combination With Mometasone Furoate Via the pMDI and Formoterol Fumarate Via the Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI)
NCT00783224 (1) [back to overview]Change in 4 Nasal Symptom Score (Sneezing Attack, Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, and Nasal Itching) After 2 Weeks
NCT00941798 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Final Visit
NCT00941798 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiration Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Final Visit
NCT00941798 (12) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of the First Serious Asthma Exacerbation Resulting in Hospitalization, Intubation or Death.
NCT00941798 (12) [back to overview]Number of Patients With at Least One Asthma Worsening Post-baseline
NCT00941798 (12) [back to overview]Patients With Asthma Exacerbations That Required Treatment With Systemic Corticosteroids
NCT00941798 (12) [back to overview]Time to First Serious Asthma Exacerbation
NCT00941798 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average Asthma Symptom Score Total, Daytime and Nighttime
NCT00941798 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Expiration Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Final Visit
NCT00941798 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Final Visit
NCT00941798 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percentage of Days With no Asthma Symptoms During the Morning, Daytime and Nighttime
NCT00941798 (12) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) and Trough Evening PEF Averaged Over the Entire Post-baseline Period
NCT00941798 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percentage of Days With no Rescue Medication Use During 24 Hours, Daytime and Nighttime
NCT01038427 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)
NCT01038427 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)
NCT01038427 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)
NCT01038427 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)
NCT01061333 (8) [back to overview]Allergen-induced Concentrations of Sputum LTC4
NCT01061333 (8) [back to overview]Allergen-induced Concentrations of Sputum LTD4
NCT01061333 (8) [back to overview]Allergen-induced Concentrations of Sputum LTE4
NCT01061333 (8) [back to overview]Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT01061333 (8) [back to overview]Change in Plasma 9P at 20 Minutes
NCT01061333 (8) [back to overview]Change in Plasma 9α-11β-PGF2 (9P) at 5 Minutes
NCT01061333 (8) [back to overview]Allergen-induced Changes in Urinary 9P
NCT01061333 (8) [back to overview]Allergen-induced Changes in Urinary Leukotriene (LT) E4
NCT01098071 (8) [back to overview]Degree of Posterior Choana Obstruction at Baseline and Week 12
NCT01098071 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Referred to Surgery (Adenoidectomy) Within 12 Weeks of Start of Therapy
NCT01098071 (8) [back to overview]Severity of Eye Symptoms at Baseline and Week 12
NCT01098071 (8) [back to overview]Severity of Sneezing at Baseline and Week 12
NCT01098071 (8) [back to overview]Severity of Rhinorrhea at Baseline and Week 12
NCT01098071 (8) [back to overview]Severity of Nasal Obstruction Symptoms at Baseline and Week 12 as Measured by the Total Clinical Score
NCT01098071 (8) [back to overview]Severity of Nasal Itching at Baseline and Week 12
NCT01098071 (8) [back to overview]Severity of Nasal Congestion at Baseline and Week 12
NCT01118312 (2) [back to overview]Childhood Asthma Control Test
NCT01118312 (2) [back to overview]Asthma Control Test (ACT)
NCT01135134 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score at 1 Week
NCT01135134 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score at 2 Weeks
NCT01165424 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score
NCT01165424 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Adverse Drug Reactions
NCT01210170 (2) [back to overview]Albuterol Induced Percent Change in Qaw
NCT01210170 (2) [back to overview]Albuterol-induced Change in FEV1
NCT01258803 (8) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From 0-12 Hours (AUC[0-12h]) of the Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After a Single Dose of MF/F MDI With Spacer Compared to Placebo MDI Combined With or Without Spacer
NCT01258803 (8) [back to overview]AUC (0-12h) of the Change From Baseline in FEV1 After a Single Dose of F DPI Compared to Placebo MDI Combined With or Without Spacer
NCT01258803 (8) [back to overview]AUC (0-12h) of the Change From Baseline in FEV1 After a Single Dose of MF/F With Spacer Compared to F DPI
NCT01258803 (8) [back to overview]AUC (0-12h) of the Change From Baseline in FEV1 After a Single Dose of MF/F Without Spacer Compared to F DPI
NCT01258803 (8) [back to overview]AUC(0-12h) of the Change From Baseline in FEV1 After a Single Dose MF/F MDI Without Spacer Compared to Placebo MDI Combined With or Without Spacer
NCT01258803 (8) [back to overview]AUC(0-12h) of the Change From Baseline in FEV1 After a Single Dose of MF/F MDI With Spacer Compared to MF/F MDI Without Spacer
NCT01258803 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FEV1 After a Single Dose of MF/F MDI With Spacer, MF/F MDI Without Spacer, F DPI or Placebo MDI Combined With or Without Spacer at 5 and 30 Minutes, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 Hours Postdose
NCT01258803 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) After a Single Dose of MF/F MDI With Spacer, MF/F MDI Without Spacer, F DPI or Placebo MDI Combined With or Without Spacer at 5 and 30 Minutes, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 Hours Postdose
NCT01287364 (6) [back to overview]Discriminant Validity of Treatment Satisfaction Subscales Statistical Analyses Based on Baseline Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) Categories (Low, Medium, High)
NCT01287364 (6) [back to overview]Principal Components Analysis (Treatment Process, Treatment Outcomes) Factor Loadings for Treatment Preference Scales
NCT01287364 (6) [back to overview]Responsiveness Statistical Analysis of Treatment Satisfaction Subscales for Treatment Period 2 Versus Change in rTNSS From Baseline Categories (Low Change, Medium Change, or High Change)
NCT01287364 (6) [back to overview]Sensitivity Analyses of Treatment Satisfaction Subscales: Standard Effect Sizes (SES)
NCT01287364 (6) [back to overview]Treatment Satisfaction Subscales (Interference, Regimen Adaptation, Role Limitations, Sensory Impact, Regimen Difficulties, Burden, Hassle, Regimen Management, and Perceived Relief)Reliability Statistics
NCT01287364 (6) [back to overview]Responsiveness Statistical Analysis of Treatment Satisfaction Subscales for Treatment Period 1 Versus Change in rTNSS From Baseline Categories (Low Change, Medium Change, or High Change)
NCT01371786 (5) [back to overview]Initial Deposition of Radioactivity Within the Nasal Cavity as a Percent of Delivered Dose
NCT01371786 (5) [back to overview]Initial Deposition of Radioactivity on Nasal Wipes as a Percent of Delivered Dose
NCT01371786 (5) [back to overview]Deposition of Radioactivity Within the Nasal Cavity Over 10 Minutes as a Percent of Delivered Dose
NCT01371786 (5) [back to overview]Deposition of Radioactivity Within on Nasal Wipes Over 10 Minutes as a Percent of Delivered Dose
NCT01371786 (5) [back to overview]Initial Deposition of Radioactivity Within the Nasopharynx as a Percent of Delivered Dose
NCT01386125 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Congestion/Obstruction Score
NCT01386125 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Polyp Size Score
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]The Percentage of Subjects Experiencing AEs
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]The Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Nasal AEs, Including Epistaxis, Nasal Ulceration, and Nasal Perforation
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Total Preference Composite Score Assessed at the End of the Study. The Total Preference Score is the Standardized Sum of 17 Individual Preference Items
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Treatment Outcome Composite Score Assessed at the End of the Study
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Treatment Process Composite Preference Score
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Work/Disability Days: Bed Days
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Work/Disability Days: Missed Work
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Work/Disability Days: Reduced Activity Days
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Regimen Difficulties
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Regimen Adaptation
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Interference
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life: General Symptom Interference Scale
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life: General Health Perceptions Scale
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Burden
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Treatment Functional Impact Composite Score
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Regimen Acceptance Composite Score
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Subject-reported AM and PM rTNSS Averaged Over Each 2-week Treatment Period.
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Regimen Attributes Composite Score
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life: Allergic-Rhinitis Specific Symptom Interference Scale
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Sensory Impact
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Role Limitation
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Regimen Management
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in Overall Quality of Life Composite Score
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Perceived Relief
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]The Number of Subjects Experiencing AEs
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]The Number of Subjects Experiencing Nasal AEs, Including Epistaxis, Nasal Ulceration, and Nasal Perforation
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life: Symptoms and Side-Effects Distress Scale
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Hassle
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life: Work Well Being Questionnaire Scale
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life: Perceived Health (Global Analogue Scale)
NCT01401465 (31) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life: Mental and Emotional Health Scale
NCT01471340 (3) [back to overview]Time-to-First Serious Asthma Outcomes (SAO): Number of First SAO in the MF/F vs MF Arms
NCT01471340 (3) [back to overview]Number of SAO Components in MF/F Participants vs MF Participants
NCT01471340 (3) [back to overview]Time-to-First Severe Asthma Exacerbation (SAEX): Number of First SAEX in the MF/F vs MF Arms
NCT01502371 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Morning (AM) Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) - MF MDI vs. Placebo
NCT01502371 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted AM FEV1 - MF MDI 50 mcg BID vs. MF DPI 100 mcg QD
NCT01502371 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardised Activities (PAQLQ(S)) Total Score - MF MDI vs. Placebo
NCT01502371 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) - MF MDI vs. Placebo
NCT01555151 (11) [back to overview]Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After Days 8, 15 and 22 of Treatment
NCT01555151 (11) [back to overview]Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
NCT01555151 (11) [back to overview]Plasma Cortisol Concentrations
NCT01555151 (11) [back to overview]Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)
NCT01555151 (11) [back to overview]Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at All Time Points
NCT01555151 (11) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Forced Vital Capacity (FEV1/FVC) Percent at All Time Points
NCT01555151 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Days With no Rescue Medication Use Over 4 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01555151 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) by Visit
NCT01555151 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) Over 4 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01555151 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Over 4 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01555151 (11) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Flow Between 25% and 75% (FEF25-75%) at All Time Points
NCT01566149 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With At Least One Serious AE
NCT01566149 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With At Least One Drug-Related AE
NCT01566149 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With At Least One Adverse Event (AE)
NCT01566149 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued From the Study Due to an AE
NCT01566149 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Total Amounts (in Doses) of Systemic Corticosteroids Used to Treat Asthma Exacerbations Over the 12 Week Treatment Period
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) After 2 Weeks (Day 15), 4 Weeks (Day 29), and 8 Weeks (Day 57) of Treatment.
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) on Day 1, Day 2, Day 14, Day 15, Day 84, Day 85 at All Time Points
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Asthma Control Questionnaire 5 (ACQ-5) After 12 Weeks (Day 85)
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients Who Permanently Discontinued Study Due to Asthma Exacerbation Over the 12 Week Treatment Period
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Time to Permanent Study Discontinuation Due to Asthma Exacerbation Over the 12 Week Treatment Period
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) After 12 Weeks (Day 85)
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Asthma Control Questionnaire 5 (ACQ-5) After 4 Weeks (Day 29) and After 8 Weeks (Day 57) of Treatment
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ(S)) After 4 Weeks (Day 29) and 12 Weeks (Day 85) of Treatment
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Duration of Asthma Exacerbations (Mild, Moderate, Severe, Moderate or Severe and Any) Over the 12 Week Treatment Period
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF 25-75% )on Day 1, Day 2, Day 14, Day 15, Day 84, Day 85
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)/ Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) on Day 1, Day 2, Day 14, Day 15, Day 84, Day 85
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) Over 12 Weeks of Treatment. This is LS Mean of the Treatment Period.
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Day 1, 2 Weeks (Day 14), 12 Weeks (Day 84)
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Plasma Indacaterol Concentrations at Day 1 and Day 14
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Standardized Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) at (5 Min - 4 h), (5 Min - 1 h) (1 h - 4 h) Measured on Day 1, 2 Weeks (Day 14)&12 Weeks (Day 84)
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]The Annual Rate of Asthma Exacerbations (Mild, Moderate, Severe, Moderate or Severe and Any) Over the 12 Week Treatment Period
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients With at Least One Asthma Exacerbation (Mild, Moderate, Severe, Moderate or Severe and Any) Over the 12 Week Treatment Period
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]The Usage of Rescue Medication (Short Acting β2-agonist) Over 12 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01609478 (20) [back to overview]Time to First Asthma Exacerbation (Mild, Moderate, Severe, Moderate or Severe and Any) Over the 12 Week Treatment Period
NCT01616160 (2) [back to overview]Change in Steroid Sensitivity in Vivo Nasal Endoscopy Polyp Scores
NCT01616160 (2) [back to overview]Change in Steroid Sensitivity in Vivo Symptom Scores - Trouble With Sense of Smell
NCT01676415 (3) [back to overview]Medication Side-effect and Compliance Inventory
NCT01676415 (3) [back to overview]Taskforce Symptom Inventory
NCT01676415 (3) [back to overview]SNOT-22 Questionnaire
NCT01700192 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience At Least One Adverse Event (AE)
NCT01700192 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AE
NCT01700192 (7) [back to overview]Average Total Combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Score (TCS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01700192 (7) [back to overview]Average Total Combined Rhinitis Score (TCRS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01700192 (7) [back to overview]Average Rhinitis Daily Symptom Score (Rhinitis DSS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01700192 (7) [back to overview]Average Rhinitis Daily Medication Score (Rhinitis DMS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01700192 (7) [back to overview]Average Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptoms Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01732536 (6) [back to overview]Bilateral Polyp Grade
NCT01732536 (6) [back to overview]Bilateral Polyp Grade
NCT01732536 (6) [back to overview]Ethmoid Sinus Obstruction
NCT01732536 (6) [back to overview]Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Score
NCT01732536 (6) [back to overview]Nasal Obstruction/Congestion Score
NCT01732536 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Indicated for Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (RESS)
NCT01850823 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average AM/PM Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) Over Days 1 to 14.
NCT01850823 (2) [back to overview]Superiority of Active Treatment Arms Over Placebo
NCT01856543 (3) [back to overview]Difference Between Patient-reported Skin Toxicities at End of Radiation Therapy and 2 Week Follow-up
NCT01856543 (3) [back to overview]Difference From Baseline and 5 Weeks Between Patient-reported Skin Toxicities at Baseline and End of Radiation Treatment
NCT01856543 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Moist Desquamation
NCT01894503 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Plasma Mometasone Furoate Concentration >LLOQ
NCT01894503 (2) [back to overview]Number of Sinuses With Successful Implant Delivery
NCT01920893 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sinus Computed Tomography (CT) Scan Assessments at Week 16: Lund-Mackay Score
NCT01920893 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Participant Reported Symptoms Scores of Sinusitis at Week 16
NCT01920893 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sinus Computed Tomography (CT) Scan Assessments at Week 16: Percent Area Occupied by Disease
NCT01920893 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Nasal Total Symptoms Score (nTSS) at Week 16
NCT01920893 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow (NPIF) at Week 16
NCT01920893 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bilateral Endoscopic Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) at Week 16
NCT01920893 (11) [back to overview]Time to First Response in NPS: Kaplan-Meier Estimate at Week 16
NCT01920893 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Rhinosinusitis Symptoms Severity at Week 16
NCT01920893 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Smell Test (University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test [UPSIT]) Scores at Week 16
NCT01920893 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 22-Item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) at Week 16
NCT01920893 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bilateral Endoscopic NPS at Week 16 in Participants With Asthma
NCT02045875 (3) [back to overview]Overall Adherence to Dulera 100/5 and 200/5
NCT02045875 (3) [back to overview]Adherence to Dulera 100/5 and 200/5
NCT02045875 (3) [back to overview]Asthma Control
NCT02061202 (10) [back to overview]Change in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain
NCT02061202 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Completed Follow up
NCT02061202 (10) [back to overview]Asthma Control Test
NCT02061202 (10) [back to overview]Change in Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-Me)
NCT02061202 (10) [back to overview]Change in Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO)
NCT02061202 (10) [back to overview]Change in FEV1/FVC
NCT02061202 (10) [back to overview]Change in Reticulocytes Count
NCT02061202 (10) [back to overview]Change in Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (sVCAM) Level
NCT02061202 (10) [back to overview]The Medication Adherence Report Scale
NCT02061202 (10) [back to overview]Admissions or Visits to the Hospital
NCT02066298 (6) [back to overview]Peak Expiratory Flow Rate
NCT02066298 (6) [back to overview]Treatment Failure
NCT02066298 (6) [back to overview]Pairwise Comparison of Treatments Based on Composite Measure Using Treatment Failures, Asthma Control Days, and Percent Predicted FEV1.
NCT02066298 (6) [back to overview]Asthma Exacerbations
NCT02066298 (6) [back to overview]Annualized Asthma Control Days
NCT02066298 (6) [back to overview]Forced Expiratory Volume at One Second (FEV1) Percent of Predicted
NCT02228720 (5) [back to overview]Ostial Patency
NCT02228720 (5) [back to overview]Device Placement Success Rate
NCT02228720 (5) [back to overview]Degree of Inflammation
NCT02228720 (5) [back to overview]Adhesion/Scarring Grade 2 & 3
NCT02228720 (5) [back to overview]Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT) 22
NCT02266810 (10) [back to overview]Percent of Sinuses That Require Post-operative Interventions (Propel Nova Cohort)
NCT02266810 (10) [back to overview]Occlusion/Restenosis (Propel Mini Cohort)
NCT02266810 (10) [back to overview]Need for Surgical Interventions (Propel Nova Cohort)
NCT02266810 (10) [back to overview]Need for Surgical Interventions (Propel Mini Cohort)
NCT02266810 (10) [back to overview]Occlusion/Restenosis (Propel Nova Cohort)
NCT02266810 (10) [back to overview]Percent of Sinuses That Require Post-operative Interventions (Propel Mini Cohort)
NCT02266810 (10) [back to overview]Need for Post-operative Interventions (Propel Nova Cohort)
NCT02266810 (10) [back to overview]Inflammation (Propel Mini Cohort)
NCT02266810 (10) [back to overview]Need for Post-operative Interventions (Propel Mini Cohort)
NCT02266810 (10) [back to overview]Inflammation (Propel Nova Cohort)
NCT02291549 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Indicated for Repeat Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (RESS)
NCT02291549 (7) [back to overview]Nasal Obstruction/Congestion Score
NCT02291549 (7) [back to overview]Bilateral Polyp Grade
NCT02291549 (7) [back to overview]Ethmoid Sinus Obstruction
NCT02291549 (7) [back to overview]Decreased Sense of Smell Score
NCT02291549 (7) [back to overview]Facial Pain/Pressure Score
NCT02291549 (7) [back to overview]Nasal Obstruction/Congestion Score
NCT02318303 (1) [back to overview]Change in rTNSS From Baseline to End of Treatment
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Anaphylaxis and/or Systemic Allergic Reactions
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Average TCS During the Entire RS
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Pre-specified Local Application Site Reactions
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Average Rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DMS During the Peak RS
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Peak Ragweed Season (RS)
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Treated With Epinephrine
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Average Rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DSS During the Peak RS
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Post Dose FEV1 (5 Minutes-1 Hour)
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With at Least One Asthma Exacerbation by Exacerbation Category
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving the Minimal Important Difference (MID) ACQ ≥ 0.5 at Weeks 26 and 52
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Change Form Baseline in Percentage of Days With no Daytime Symptoms
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Change Form Baseline in Percentage of Mornings With no Symptoms on Awakening
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Duration in Days of Asthma Exacerbations by Exacerbation Category
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEF) Over 26 and 52 Weeks of Treatment
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percentage of Asthma Symptoms Free Days
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percentage of Nights With no Night-time Awakenings
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Due to Asthma Exacerbations
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Composite Endpoint of Serious Asthma Outcomes
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Time in Days to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Medication Due to Asthma Exacerbations
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Time to First Hospitalization for Asthma Exacerbation
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Total Amounts of Systemic Corticosteroids (in Doses) Used to Treat Asthma Exacerbations
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Trough FEV1 at Week 52
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Trough FEV1 Measured After 26 Weeks of Treatment
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) at Weeks 4, 12, 26 and 52
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Annual Rate of Asthma Exacerbations by Exacerbation Category
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (Trough FEV1) at Week 26
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percentage of Rescue Medication Free Days
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Trough Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF)Between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25-75)
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Time to First Asthma Exacerbation by Exacerbation Category
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Rescue Medication Usage
NCT02554786 (27) [back to overview]Pre-dose FEV1 at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT02573233 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mast Cells Count (Tryptase Positive) in the Bronchial Submucosa at Week 12
NCT02573233 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT02573233 (11) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK) Assessment: Serum Functional Dupilumab Concentration
NCT02573233 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mucin-Stained Area in the Bronchial Submucosa at Week 12
NCT02573233 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in T-Helper Lymphocytes Count in the Bronchial Submucosa at Week 12
NCT02573233 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in T-Lymphocytes Count in the Bronchial Submucosa at Week 12
NCT02573233 (11) [back to overview]Average Change in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) From Baseline to Week 6 Through Week 12
NCT02573233 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Eosinophils Cells Count in the Bronchial Submucosa at Week 12
NCT02573233 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) at Week 12
NCT02573233 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mast Cells Count (Chymase Positive) in the Bronchial Submucosa at Week 12
NCT02573233 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Antidrug Antibodies (ADA)
NCT02631551 (1) [back to overview]Change in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptoms Score (rTNSS) From Baseline to End of Treatment.
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Total Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA) Rescue Medication With MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID or MF MDI 100 mcg BID Over the First 12 Weeks of Treatment
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Morning (AM) Post-Dose % Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) in the Area Under the Curve (AUC)0-60
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AM Pre-Dose % Predicted FEV1 With MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID or MF MDI 100 mcg BID Over the First 12 Weeks of Treatment
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline AM Post-Dose Percent Predicted FEV1 on Day 1 of Treatment
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Count (Percentage) of Participants Discontinuing From Study Medication Due to An AE
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve of Mometasone Furoate From Time 0 to 12 Hours (AUC0-12)
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline AM Post-Dose % Predicted FEV1 AUC 0-4 Hours on Day 1 and Week 12 of Treatment
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Mometsone Furoate
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Participants Whose SABA Rescue Medication Use Increased Across Weeks 1-12 of the Treatment Period
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mometsone Furoate
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Count (Percentage) of Participants Experiencing At Least One Adverse Event (AE)
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve of Mometasone Furoate From Time 0 to Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last)
NCT02741271 (13) [back to overview]Participants Using SABA Rescue Medication Across Weeks 1-12 of the Treatment Period
NCT02874144 (5) [back to overview]SNOT-22 (Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22) Score
NCT02874144 (5) [back to overview]Sinus CT Scan Scores by Lund-Mackay Scores
NCT02874144 (5) [back to overview]BSIT (Brief Smell Identification Test)
NCT02874144 (5) [back to overview]TOTAL POLYP SCORE (TPS)
NCT02874144 (5) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
NCT02880514 (2) [back to overview]Patency Rate
NCT02880514 (2) [back to overview]Inflammation Score
NCT02892344 (15) [back to overview]The Number of Asthma Exacerbations (Moderate or Severe) Over the 12 Week Treatment Period
NCT02892344 (15) [back to overview]Rescue Medication Use Over 12 Weeks
NCT02892344 (15) [back to overview]PEF Over 4 and 12 Weeks
NCT02892344 (15) [back to overview]Trough FEV1 at Day 2
NCT02892344 (15) [back to overview]Trough FEV1
NCT02892344 (15) [back to overview]Quality of Life Assessed by Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire AQLQ-S 12
NCT02892344 (15) [back to overview]ACQ-7 at Week 4
NCT02892344 (15) [back to overview]ACQ-7
NCT02892344 (15) [back to overview]Pre-dose FEV1 at Week 4
NCT02892344 (15) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Asthma Exacerbation Over 12 Weeks
NCT02892344 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Rescue Medication Free Days Over 12 Weeks
NCT02892344 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With ACQ-7 MID at Week 12
NCT02892344 (15) [back to overview]Number of Patients With First Asthma Exacerbations (Moderate or Severe) Over the 12 Week Treatment Period
NCT02892344 (15) [back to overview]FVC Over 12 Weeks
NCT02892344 (15) [back to overview]Daily E-diary Over 12 Weeks
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Scores
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) for Participants With Asthma
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in European Quality of Life 5 Dimension Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale Score
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity Score
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow (NPIF)
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay (LMK) Score
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Rhinorrhea Daily Symptom Score
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Severity of Decreased/Loss of Smell as Assessed by Participant Daily
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) Score
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Total Symptom Score (TSS)
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Rhinosinusitis
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test Scores
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 for Participants With Asthma
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in European Quality of Life 5 Dimension Scale Visual Analog Scale Score
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second for Participants With Asthma
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity Score
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Polyp Score
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Polyp Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund-Mackay Score
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Polyp Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Rescue Treatment Use: Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 1 Event by Week 52 Obtained Using Kaplan-Meier Method
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent And Treatment-Boosted Anti-drug Antibodies Response (ADA)
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Functional Dupilumab Concentration in Serum
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Total Systemic Corticosteroids Rescue Intake Duration: Average Duration Per Participant
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Mean Total Systemic Corticosteroids Rescue Dose Prescribed During Treatment Period
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Changed From Baseline at Week 24 in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) for Participants With Asthma
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Visual Analogue Scale for Rhinosinusitis
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Total Symptom Score
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test Score
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Severity of Decreased/Loss of Smell
NCT02898454 (43) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Rhinorrhea Daily Symptom Score
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 and 48 in Severity of Decreased/Loss of Smell as Assessed by Participant Daily (Assessments Performed 4-24 Weeks After End of Treatment)
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Scores
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Rhinosinusitis
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow (NPIF)
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Weeks 36 and 48 in 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test Scores (Assessments Performed 12 and 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity Score
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion Symptom Severity Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion Symptom Severity Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) for Participants With Asthma
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale Score
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Rescue Treatment Use: Estimate of Percentage of Participants With >=1 Event by Week 48 Obtained Using Kaplan-Meier Method
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Rescue Treatment Use: Estimate of Percentage of Participants With >=1 Event by Week 24 Obtained Using Kaplan-Meier Method
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent And Treatment-Boosted Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Functional Dupilumab Concentration in Serum
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Weeks 36 and 48 in Visual Analog Scale for Rhinosinusitis (Assessments Performed 12 and 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Weeks 36 and 48 in Nasal Polyp Score (Assessments Performed 12 and 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Severity of Decreased/Loss of Smell as Assessed by Participant Daily
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Rhinorrhea Daily Symptom Score
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) Scores for Participants With Asthma
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 and 48 in Total Symptom Score (Assessments Performed 4-24 Weeks After End of Treatment)
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Total Symptom Score (TSS)
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 and 48 in Rhinorrhea Daily Symptom Score (Assessments Performed 4-24 Weeks After End of Treatment)
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 and 48 in Nasal Congestion Symptom Severity Score (Assessments Performed 4-24 Weeks After End of Treatment)
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Total Systemic Corticosteroids Rescue Intake Duration: Average Duration Per Participant
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Mean Total Systemic Corticosteroids Rescue Dose Prescribed During Treatment Period
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 48 in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (Assessment Performed 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund-Mackay Score (Assessment Performed 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) Score
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second for Participants With Asthma (Assessment Performed 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 Scores for Participants With Asthma (Assessment Performed 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund-Mackay (LMK) Score
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery
NCT02912468 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma
NCT03085797 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Nasal Surgery Over Time
NCT03085797 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring at Least One Course of Systemic Steroids for Nasal Polyps up to Week 52
NCT03085797 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Composite VAS Score (Combining VAS Scores for Nasal Obstruction, Nasal Discharge, Mucus in the Throat and Loss of Smell) During the 4 Weeks Prior to Week 52
NCT03085797 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 Total Score at Week 52
NCT03085797 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall VAS Score During the 4 Weeks Prior to Week 52
NCT03085797 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Nasal Obstruction Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score During the 4 Weeks Prior to Week 52
NCT03085797 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Nasal Polyps Score at Week 52
NCT03085797 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Individual VAS Symptom Score: Loss of Smell During the 4 Weeks Prior to Week 52
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Total Number of Courses of SCS for NP
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Total Duration of SCS_NP (Days)
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Time to the First NP Surgery up to Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Time to First SCS_NP up to Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Time to First NP Surgery and/or SCS Use for NP to Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With SCS_NP
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Difficulty With Daily Activities Due to Nasal Symptoms at Week 40
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total NPS at Week 40
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Physical Component Summary at Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Physical Functioning at Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SNOT-22 at Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems at Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Role Limitations Due to Physical Health at Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Social Functioning at Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Vitality at Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SNOT-22 at Week 40
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in DSS at Week 40
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Difficulty With Sleeping Due to Nasal Symptoms at Week 40
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sinus Severity Score at EOT/IPD
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Annual SCS_NP Use Rate Comparison by Period, Negative Binomial Model
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With NP Surgery or SCS_NP
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With NP Surgery
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in UPSIT Score in Males at Week 40
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in UPSIT Score in Females at Week 40
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in DSS at Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in LMS at EOT/IPD
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in NBS at Week 40
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in NBS at Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in NPS at Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Bodily Pain at Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 General Health Perceptions at Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Mental Component Summary at Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Mental Health at Week 56
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in TSS at Week 40
NCT03401229 (35) [back to overview]Total SCS_NP Dose (a) Used (mg)
NCT03614923 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) Score at Week 16
NCT03614923 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Eosinophil Count
NCT03614923 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) to Week 16
NCT03705793 (3) [back to overview]Change in Nasal Endoscopic Findings Using the Lund-Kennedy Grading System
NCT03705793 (3) [back to overview]Change in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test Scores (SNOT-22)
NCT03705793 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Score <3 on the Clinical Global Impression Scale
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the TNSS At Day 15 (Physician-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) (Average of Morning [AM]/Evening [PM] Score) Averaged Over Days 1 to 15 (Participant-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the TNSS At Day 8 (Physician-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the TNSS At Day 4 (Physician-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the TNSS At Day 29 (Physician-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the TNSS At Day 22 (Physician-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 8 (Physician-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 22 (Physician-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 4 (Physician-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 4 (Participant-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 8 (Participant-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to An Adverse Event (AE)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 29 (Physician-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced ≥1 Adverse Event
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Response To Therapy At Day 15 (Participant-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Response To Therapy At Day 15 (Physician-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Response To Therapy At Day 22 (Participant-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Response To Therapy At Day 22 (Physician-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Response To Therapy At Day 29 (Participant-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Response To Therapy At Day 29 (Physician-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Response To Therapy At Day 4 (Participant-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Response To Therapy At Day 4 (Physician-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Response To Therapy At Day 8 (Participant-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Response To Therapy At Day 8 (Physician-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 15 (Participant-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 15 (Physician-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 22 (Participant-Evaluated)
NCT03855189 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 29 (Participant-Evaluated)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Symptom Score on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Response to Therapy on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Response to Therapy on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (Assessed by Participant)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (Assessed by Participant)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Symptom Score on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Baseline Overall Disease Condition Score for Calculation of Change From Baseline at Days 4, 8, and 15 as Assessed by Participant
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Baseline Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) for Calculation of Change From Baseline at Days 4, 8, and 15 Visits as Assessed by Investigator
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Baseline Overall Disease Condition Score for Calculation of Change From Baseline at Days 4, 8, and 15 Visits as Assessed by Investigator
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (CFB) in Overall Disease Condition Score at Day 15 as Assessed by Participant
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Baseline Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) for Calculation of Change From Baseline Averaged Over 15 Days of Treatment as Assessed by Participant
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (CFB) in Overall Disease Condition Score at Day 4 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Therapeutic Response to Treatment at Day 8 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Therapeutic Response to Treatment at Day 8 as Assessed by Participant
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (CFB) in Overall Disease Condition Score at Day 4 as Assessed by Participant
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (CFB) in Overall Disease Condition Score at Day 8 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (CFB) in Overall Disease Condition Score at Day 8 as Assessed by Participant
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (CFB) in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) at Day 15 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (CFB) in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) at Day 4 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (CFB) in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) at Day 8 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (CFB) in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Averaged Over 15 Days of Treatment, as Assessed by Participant
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Disease Condition Score at Day 15 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Median Time to Onset of Nasal Symptom Relief as Assessed by Participant Diary Responses
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Therapeutic Response to Treatment at Day 15 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Therapeutic Response to Treatment at Day 15 as Assessed by Participant
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Therapeutic Response to Treatment at Day 4 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT03861559 (21) [back to overview]Therapeutic Response to Treatment at Day 4 as Assessed by Participant
NCT03879772 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) on Day 4 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT03879772 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) on Day 29 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT03879772 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) [Average of Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Score] Averaged Over Days 16 to 29 as Assessed by Participant
NCT03879772 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) [Average of Morning (AM), Evening (PM) Score] Averaged Over Days 1 to 15 as Assessed by Participant
NCT03879772 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) on Day 15 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT03879772 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) at Day 8 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT03882047 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score Averaged Over Day 1 Through Day 15 (Based on Participant Diaries)
NCT03882047 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score at Day 4 (Physician Evaluation)
NCT03882047 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score at Day 15 (Physician Evaluation)
NCT03882047 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis at Day 4 (Physician Evaluation)
NCT03882047 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis at Day 4 (Participant Evaluation)
NCT03882047 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis at Day 15 (Physician Evaluation)
NCT03882047 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis at Day 15 (Participant Evaluation)
NCT03882047 (11) [back to overview]Response to Therapy at Day 4 (Physician Evaluation)
NCT03882047 (11) [back to overview]Response to Therapy at Day 4 (Participant Evaluation)
NCT03882047 (11) [back to overview]Response to Therapy at Day 15 (Physician Evaluation)
NCT03882047 (11) [back to overview]Response to Therapy at Day 15 (Participant Evaluation)
NCT04179461 (4) [back to overview]Pulmonary Function Measured by Spirometry: Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) / Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT04179461 (4) [back to overview]Asthma Control Test (ACT)
NCT04179461 (4) [back to overview]Adherence of Asthma Controller Medication
NCT04179461 (4) [back to overview]Change in Composite Asthma Severity Index (CASI)
NCT04499235 (8) [back to overview]The Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve Disease Control Without Rescue Therapy
NCT04499235 (8) [back to overview]Total Cumulative Steroid Exposure
NCT04499235 (8) [back to overview]Maximum Daily Steroid Dose
NCT04499235 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAEs, Assessed by Seriousness and Severity
NCT04499235 (8) [back to overview]The Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) Score
NCT04499235 (8) [back to overview]The Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index Visual Analog Scale (BPDAI-VAS)
NCT04499235 (8) [back to overview]Time to Rescue Therapy
NCT04499235 (8) [back to overview]Time to Disease Control
NCT04589663 (3) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time Point 6h (AUC0-6h) of Mometasone Furoate
NCT04589663 (3) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Mometasone Furoate Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT04589663 (3) [back to overview]Systemic Exposure to Indacaterol in Plasma

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Nighttime Awakenings Due to Asthma

Participants recorded the number of times during the night they awakened due to asthma. The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionAwakenings (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 1Change at Week 2Change at Week 3Change at Week 4Change at Final Week
Mometasone0.6-0.1-0.1-0.3-0.2-0.2
Placebo0.6-0.2-0.2-0.3-0.3-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Chest Tightness Symptom Score

Chest tightness is an asthma symptom assessed by participants using diary cards to record morning and evening chest tightness (recorded twice daily). Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her chest tightness for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). The severity of chest tightness was rated on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom [best score] to 3=symptoms were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone1.6-0.2-0.3-0.5-0.5-0.41.6-0.3-0.4-0.6-0.6-0.6
Placebo1.6-0.4-0.4-0.7-0.7-0.61.6-0.5-0.5-0.7-0.7-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Cough Symptom Score

Cough is an asthma symptom assessed by participants who used diary cards to record morning and evening cough (recorded twice daily). Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her coughing for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). Cough was rated on a 4-point scale (0=no symptoms [best score] to 3=symptoms were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). Reduction in score indicated an improvement in cough symptoms. The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone1.7-0.3-0.4-0.7-0.7-0.61.7-0.4-0.5-0.7-0.7-0.6
Placebo1.5-0.3-0.4-0.4-0.5-0.51.5-0.4-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Difficulty Breathing Symptom Score

Difficulty breathing is an asthma symptom assessed by participants using diary cards to record morning and evening difficulty breathing (recorded twice daily). Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her difficulty breathing for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). Difficulty breathing was rated on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom [best score] to 3=symptoms were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone1.7-0.3-0.4-0.7-0.7-0.61.7-0.3-0.4-0.6-0.7-0.6
Placebo1.6-0.3-0.4-0.6-0.7-0.61.6-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.7-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Nasal Congestion Symptom Score

Nasal congestion is a symptom of SAR assessed by participants using diary cards to record morning and evening nasal congestion (recorded twice daily). Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her nasal congestion for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). It was assessed on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom [best score] to 3=symptoms were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone2.3-0.4-0.5-0.7-0.8-0.82.2-0.4-0.6-0.8-0.9-0.8
Placebo2.3-0.3-0.4-0.5-0.7-0.62.2-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.8-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Nasal Itching Symptom Score

Nasal itching is a symptom of SAR assessed by participants using diary cards to record morning and evening nasal itching (recorded twice daily). Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her nasal itching for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). It was assessed on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom [best score] to 3=symptoms were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone2.0-0.4-0.6-0.9-0.9-0.81.7-0.4-0.7-0.9-0.9-0.8
Placebo1.9-0.2-0.3-0.5-0.6-0.51.5-0.3-0.4-0.6-0.7-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Nasal Sneezing Symptom Score

Nasal sneezing is a symptom of SAR assessed by participants using diary cards to record morning and evening nasal sneezing (recorded twice daily). Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her nasal sneezing for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). It was assessed on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom [best score] to 3=symptoms a were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone1.8-0.5-0.6-0.9-0.9-0.81.9-0.5-0.7-0.9-0.9-0.9
Placebo1.7-0.2-0.6-0.4-0.6-0.61.8-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.7-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)

Participants used a peak flow meter to measure the rate of air forcibly expelled from the lungs. They performed triplicate PEFR measurements in the morning prior to taking their study medication and again in the evening, and documented the highest of the three values in their diaries. A day with worsening asthma was any day during which a decrease from baseline in morning (AM) PEFR of more than 25% occurred. The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionLiters/min (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone382.50.94.37.77.85.7394.40.54.95.86.95.6
Placebo362.31.04.11.03.34.6373.44.37.08.710.310.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Rhinorrhea Symptom Score

Rhinorrhea is a symptom of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) assessed by participants using diary cards to record morning and evening rhinorrhea (recorded twice daily). Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her rhinorrhea for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). Rhinorrhea was assessed on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom [best score] to 3=symptoms were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone2.2-0.3-0.5-0.7-0.9-0.82.1-0.4-0.5-0.8-0.9-0.8
Placebo2.1-0.2-0.3-0.4-0.5-0.52.0-0.3-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Total Nasal Symptom Severity (TNSS)

The Total Nasal Symptom Severity (TNSS) is the sum of severity scores for 4 nasal symptoms: nasal rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness/congestion, sneezing, and nasal itching as assessed in the participant diaries. The severity of each nasal symptom was rated on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom [best score] to 3=symptoms were hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]); minimum TNSS=0; maximum TNSS=12. A decrease in TNSS indicated an improvement in nasal symptoms. The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Week 1 (AM)Week 2 (AM)Week 3 (AM)Week 4 (AM)Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Week 1 (PM)Week 2 (PM)Week 3 (PM)Week 4 (PM)Final Week (PM)
Mometasone8.4-1.7-2.3-3.2-3.5-3.18.2-1.8-2.6-3.4-3.6-3.3
Placebo7.9-0.9-1.3-1.8-2.4-2.27.9-1.5-1.8-2.4-2.8-2.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM and PM Wheeze Symptom Score

Wheezing is a symptom of asthma. The wheezing assessment was based on participant diary data only. Every morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her wheezing for the time period since the last evaluation (or for the previous 12 hours for the first evaluation). Wheeze severity was rated on a 4-point scale (0=no wheezing [best score] to 3=wheezing was hard to tolerate and interfered with daily life activity [worst score]). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone1.5-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.6-0.51.5-0.3-0.4-0.6-0.7-0.6
Placebo1.3-0.3-0.3-0.5-0.6-0.51.3-0.4-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) Between 25% and 75% of the Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%)

Measured by the investigator (or a designated assistant) using a spirometer, FEF25%-75% is the average forcibly expelled air flow rate, measured between 75% and 25% of FVC. (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15 and Day 29

,
InterventionLiters/sec (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 15Change at Day 29
Mometasone2.980.120.15
Placebo3.000.000.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

Measured by the investigator (or a designated assistant) using a spirometer, FEV1 is the volume of air forcibly expelled from the lungs in one second. (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15 and Day 29

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 15Change at Day 29
Mometasone2.980.050.04
Placebo3.000.070.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Measured by the investigator (or a designated assistant) using a spirometer, FVC is the total volume of air forcibly expelled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15 and Day 29

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 15Change at Day 29
Mometasone3.750.02-0.00
Placebo3.800.000.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Total Asthma Symptom Severity (TASS)

Each morning prior to dosing and each evening approximately 12 hours later, the participant evaluated his/her asthma symptoms. The TASS was the sum of severity scores for 4 asthma symptoms: cough, wheeze, difficulty of breathing, and chest tightness. The severity of each asthma symptom was rated on a 4-point scale (0=no symptom; 3=severe); minimum TASS=0; maximum TASS=12. A decrease in TASS indicated an improvement in asthma symptoms. The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (AM)Change at Week 1 (AM)Change at Week 2 (AM)Change at Week 3 (AM)Change at Week 4 (AM)Change at Final Week (AM)Baseline (PM)Change at Week 1 (PM)Change at Week 2 (PM)Change at Week 3 (PM)Change at Week 4 (PM)Change at Final Week (PM)
Mometasone6.5-0.9-1.5-2.4-2.5-2.26.6-1.4-1.7-2.6-2.7-2.4
Placebo5.9-1.4-1.5-2.1-2.6-2.26.0-1.7-1.7-2.3-2.5-2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Auscultation/Wheezing Assessment

Wheezing was assessed by the investigator or designee based upon pulmonary auscultation (listening with a stethoscope) and reported in the case report form as present or absent. The count of wheezing presence (yes, no) at visits was summarized. (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15 and Day 29

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Present at BaselineAbsent at BaselinePresent on Day 15Absent on Day 15Present on Day 29Absent on Day 29
Mometasone111018941098
Placebo966468371

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Number of Puffs of Albuterol/Salbutamol Used

Once daily, participants recorded in their diaries the total number of puffs of albuterol/salbutamol used in each 24-hour period. The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionNumber of puffs (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 1Change at Week 2Change at Week 3Change at Week 4Change at Final Week
Mometasone2.4-0.4-0.6-0.8-0.7-0.7
Placebo2.1-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.6-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Interference With Daily Activities

Interference with daily activities was rated once each evening using a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (substantially interfered with activities or not able to perform the activities at all). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 1Change at Week 2Change at Week 3Change at Week 4Change at Final Week
Mometasone1.5-0.3-0.4-0.6-0.6-0.5
Placebo1.4-0.4-0.3-0.4-0.5-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Interference With Sleep

Interference with sleep was rated once each morning using a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (substantially interferes with sleep). The Final Week was the final 7 days post Day 1 (e. g., if Day 20 was the day of last dose of study medication, then the AM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 14 to Day 20, and the PM assessment at Final Week was calculated from Day 13 to Day 19). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 4

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 1Change at Week 2Change at Week 3Change at Week 4Change at Final Week
Mometasone1.3-0.2-0.4-0.5-0.5-0.4
Placebo1.2-0.2-0.3-0.4-0.5-0.4

[back to top]

Therapeutic Response to SAR Nasal Symptoms

On Day 15 and Day 29, the investigator or designee and participant jointly assessed the participant's response to study intervention by comparing the current level of SAR symptoms with those noted on Day 1. Therapeutic response for SAR symptoms was based on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (Complete Relief) to 5 (No Relief). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 29

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
SAR Nasal: Day 15SAR Nasal: Day 29
Mometasone3.23.0
Placebo3.43.4

[back to top]

Therapeutic Response to Asthma Symptoms

On Day 15 and Day 29, the investigator or designee and participant jointly assessed the participant's response to study intervention by comparing the current level of asthma symptoms with those noted on Day 1. Therapeutic response for asthma symptoms was based on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (Complete Relief) to 5 (No Relief). (NCT00070707)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 29

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Asthma: Day 15Asthma: Day 29
Mometasone3.43.2
Placebo3.43.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline (Day 1/Visit 3) in the Sleep Problems Index II (SLP9) Score From the Medical Outcome Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at the Day 29 Visit.

"Following Visit 2 (Screening), at Baseline, Day 15, and Day 29 visits, participants needed to complete the MOS-SS questionnaire with scores from 1 = all of the time to 6 = none of the time, according to their frequency of occurrence during the previous week. The analysis endpoint MOS-SS Sleep Problems Index II (SLP9) score was derived from MOS-SS questionnaire and scaled from 0 = none of the time to 100 = all of the time.~NOTE: Least squares means and standard errors were obtained from an ANCOVA model with the treatment effect and the variable specific Baseline as a covariate." (NCT00358527)
Timeframe: 29 days

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from baseline in SLP9 scoreBaseline SLP9 Score
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-26.168.6
Placebo Nasal Spray.-25.869.2

[back to top]

Apnea-Hypopnea Index

Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), used to assess severity of sleep apnea based on total number of complete cessations (apnea) and partial obstructions (hypopnea) of breathing occurring per hour of sleep. Determined by the frequency of occurrence of apnea-hypopnea episodes measured during sleep at home by an Embletta device. (NCT00359216)
Timeframe: change from baseline (screening) at the end of 28 days of treatment

Interventionapnea-hypopnea episodes per hour (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray1.0
Placebo Nasal Spray1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow at 2 Weeks

An increase between visits indicates improved nasal airflow. (NCT00361439)
Timeframe: baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionliters per minute (Median)
Mometasone19.2
Placebo-37.5

[back to top]

Histological Findings

Number of eosinophils per high-powered field (HPF) in olfactory biopsy taken after 2 weeks of study treatment (higher values indicate greater inflammation); average of three HPF reported (NCT00361439)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventioneosinophils per HPF (Median)
Mometasone0.167
Placebo2.67

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score at 2 Weeks

A decrease in scores between visits signifies an improvement in nasal symptoms. The total nasal symptom score can range from 0 to 27. (NCT00361439)
Timeframe: baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Mometasone-12
Placebo-5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Eosinophils at 2 Weeks

"A decrease between visits signifies a reduction in inflammation.~Calculated from cytology specimens obtained by lavage." (NCT00361439)
Timeframe: baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionpercentage of eosinophils (Median)
Mometasone-1.35
Placebo-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline 24-hour Urinary Free Cortisol Level Corrected for Creatinine

The key secondary objective of this study was the assessment of the 24-hour urinary free cortisol level (corrected for creatinine). (NCT00378378)
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint

,,
Interventionmcg/hour (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineBaseline to Endpoint
MFNS 100 or 200 mcg BID for Subjects 6 to Less Than 18 Years6.70.0
MFNS 100 or 200 mcg QD for Subjects 6 to Less Than 18 Years5.31.0
Pooled Placebo7.6-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline 24-hour Urinary Free Cortisol Level

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS) in the treatment of pediatric subjects 6 to <18 years of age. Primary safety was to be assessed by determining the subject's 24-hour urinary free cortisol level. (NCT00378378)
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint

,,
Interventionmcg/hour (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Endpoint
MFNS 100 or 200 mcg BID for Subjects 6 to Less Than 18 Years49.51.5
MFNS 100 or 200 mcg QD for Subjects 6 to Less Than 18 Years39.611.6
Pooled Placebo49.8-2.1

[back to top]

The Number of All Randomized Subjects Reporting Adverse Events (AEs).

AEs that are considered Related, Severe, and Serious, as determined by the investigator and using specific criteria defined in the protocol, are included in the primary results. (NCT00379288)
Timeframe: 1 year

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Related Adverse EventsSevere Adverse EventsSerious Adverse Events
F/SC 250/50 mcg BID561644
F/SC 500/50 mcg BID501342
MF/F 200/10 mcg BID1094087
MF/F 400/10 mcg BID1033058

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proportion of Nights Across the Treatment Period With Nocturnal Awakenings Due to Asthma That Require Use of Short-Acting Beta Agonists (SABA)

Baseline was the proportion of nights of the last week (Days -7 to 1) prior to first dose with nocturnal awakenings. Scale is measured as 0 to 1 with 0 = no awakenings to 1 = awakenings every night. The comparison was for MF/F versus placebo. Standard deviation was pooled. (NCT00381485)
Timeframe: 12-week Treatment Period

InterventionProportion of nights (Least Squares Mean)
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID-0.10
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID-0.10
MF MDI 400 mcg BID-0.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ[S]) Total Score

AQLQ(S) consists of 32 questions each scaled from 1 (worst case) to 7 (best case). The AQLQ(S) Total score was the mean of the individual 32 questions. The comparison was for MF/F versus placebo. Standard deviation was pooled. (NCT00381485)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID0.51
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID0.61
MF MDI 400 mcg BID0.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Total Score

ACQ consists of seven questions each scaled from 0 (best case) to 6 (worst case). The ACQ Total score was the mean of the individual seven questions. The comparison was for MF/F versus placebo. Standard deviation was pooled. (NCT00381485)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID-0.58
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID-0.59
MF MDI 400 mcg BID-0.42

[back to top]

Mean Area Under the Time Curve From 0 to 12 Hours (AUC(0-12 Hours)) of Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Forced Expiratory Volume (Liters) in 1 Second (FEV1)

The average of the two predose FEV1 measurements (30 minutes prior to dosing and 0 hour, immediately prior to dosing) at the Baseline Visit were subtracted from each of the serial measurements over the 12-hour period. The AUC was calculated based on these changes from Baseline evaluations. The comparison was for MF/F versus MF. Standard deviation was pooled. (NCT00381485)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionLiter x hour (Least Squares Mean)
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID4.19
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID3.59
MF MDI 400 mcg BID2.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ[S]) Total Score

AQLQ(S) consists of 32 questions each scaled from 1 (worst case) to 7 (best case). Standard deviations are pooled. (NCT00383240)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (n=183/189/187/189, respectively)Change from Baseline to Endpoint (26 weeks)
F MDI 10 mcg BID5.510.05
MF MDI 200 mcg BID5.400.37
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID5.380.49
Placebo BID5.56-0.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score

ACQ consists of seven questions each scaled from 0 (best case) to 6 (worst case). (NCT00383240)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 26

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (n=179/186/184/187, respectively)Change from Baseline to Endpoint (week 26)
F MDI 10 mcg BID1.430.11
MF MDI 200 mcg BID1.46-0.23
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID1.47-0.40
Placebo BID1.410.14

[back to top]

Mean Area Under the Time Curve From 0 to 12 Hours (AUC(0-12 Hours)) of Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Forced Expiratory Volume (Liters) in 1 Second (FEV1) for MF/F Versus MF

(NCT00383240)
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint (12 weeks)

,,,
Interventionliters x hours (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (n=188/189/198/192, respectively)Endpoint (Change from Baseline)
F MDI 10 mcg BID2.731.60
MF MDI 200 mcg BID1.291.31
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID3.203.19
Placebo BID1.420.51

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least One Severe Asthma Exacerbation

"A severe asthma exacerbation was defined as a clinically judged deterioration of asthma or a meaningful reduction in lung function based on any of the following criteria during the Treatment Period:~A decrease in FEV1 below the Treatment Period stability limit at any visit,~A decrease in AM or PM peak flow below the Treatment Period stability limits on any 2 consecutive days,~An occurrence of any clinical deterioration of asthma (ie, asthma attack) that resulted in emergency treatment, hospitalization due to asthma, or treatment with additional, excluded asthma medication." (NCT00383240)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26

Interventionparticipants (Number)
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID58
MF MDI 200 mcg BID65
F MDI 10 mcg BID109
Placebo BID109

[back to top]

Time-to-first Asthma Exacerbation Over the 26-week Treatment Period for the Comparison of MF/F Versus F

This endpoint was to measure the time it took for 50% of subjects in a treatment arm to experience a severe asthma exacerbation (also see the posted Other Pre-specified Outcome: Number of Participants With at Least One Severe Asthma Exacerbation) (NCT00383240)
Timeframe: 26-week Treatment Period

Interventiondays (Median)
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BIDNA
MF MDI 200 mcg BIDNA
F MDI 10 mcg BID92
Placebo BID131

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proportion of Nights Across the Treatment Period With Nocturnal Awakenings Due to Asthma Which Require Use of Short-acting Beta 2-agonist (SABA)

Baseline is the proportion of nights of last week (Days -7 to 1) prior to first dose with nocturnal awakenings. Scale is measured as 0 to 1 with 0=no awakenings to 1=awakenings every night. Standard deviation is pooled. (NCT00383240)
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint

,,,
InterventionRatio (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (n=186/191/199/194, respectively)Change from Baseline to Endpoint
F MDI 10 mcg BID0.160.01
MF MDI 200 mcg BID0.16-0.05
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID0.18-0.08
Placebo BID0.150.00

[back to top]

Mean Area Under the Time Curve From 0 to 12 Hours (AUC(0-12 Hours)) of Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Forced Expiratory Volume (Liters) in 1 Second (FEV1)

FEV1 AUC was standardized to liters. Endpoint was the last post-baseline non-missing result through Week 13 carried forward. (NCT00383435)
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint (13 weeks)

,,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineEndpoint (Change from Baseline)
F MDI 10 mcg BID1.2520.077
MF MDI 400 mcg BID1.2550.057
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID1.2270.126
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID1.1860.166
Placebo1.2270.003

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 13 Endpoint in AM Predose FEV1

"Endpoint was the last post-baseline non-missing result through Week 13 carried~forward." (NCT00383435)
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint (13 weeks)

,,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineEndpoint (Change from Baseline)
F MDI 10 mcg BID1.2520
MF MDI 400 mcg BID1.2580.027
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID1.2230.058
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID1.1910.111
Placebo1.230-0.017

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Mild, Moderate, or Severe COPD Exacerbations

Mild = 12 or more inhalations/day of inhaled rescue medication or 2 or more nebulized treatments/day of inhaled rescue medication. Moderate = treatment with antibiotics or oral steroids. Severe = emergency room treatment or hospitalizations of survival curves. If an event was composed of multiple criteria, the most severe criteria was assigned to the event. (NCT00383435)
Timeframe: Endpoint (26 weeks)

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
MildModerateSevere
F MDI 10 mcg BID45304
MF MDI 400 mcg BID41301
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID48230
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID41141
Placebo41253

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Partly Stable COPD

"Partly stable COPD was a composite measure that included the following COPD~outcomes: (1) No oral steroid rescue medication; (2) No AM or PM COPD weekly average symptom score greater than 2 during at least 7 of 8 weeks; (3) No moderate or severe exacerbations; (4) No unscheduled visits due to COPD worsenings; (5) No study discontinuation due to treatment failure or~treatment-related adverse event as determined by the investigator." (NCT00383435)
Timeframe: Endpoint (26 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID82
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID95
MF MDI 400 mcg BID83
F MDI 10 mcg BID90
Placebo85

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proportion of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Symptom-Free Nights (AM Diary Symptoms)

Prior to the use of study drug rescue medication (in the morning upon awakening) the participant evaluated the COPD symptoms of wheezing, cough, and difficulty breathing. A symptom-free night was defined as a combined score of 0 (no symptoms) across all three COPD symptoms evaluated the following morning. Proportion for Baseline included data from the last week before the first dose. Proportion for Endpoint included data across the entire 26-week treatment period. (NCT00383435)
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint (26 weeks)

,,,,
InterventionProportion of symptom-free nights (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineEndpoint (Change from Baseline)
F MDI 10 mcg BID0.350.14
MF MDI 400 mcg BID0.330.11
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID0.290.07
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID0.310.15
Placebo0.310.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in St George's Respiratory Questionaire (SGRQ) Total Score

SGRQ consisted of 76 items aggregated into 3 component scores: symptoms (frequency/severity), activity (cause or limited by breathlessness), impact (social functioning, psychological disturbances from airway disease), & total score. Best health scores have a low numeric value. All component scores & total score range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating greater disease burden. A 4-point increase over placebo (and Baseline) was considered the minimum clinically important difference. Endpoint is the last post-baseline non-missing result through the 26 week evaluation carried forward. (NCT00383435)
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint (26 weeks)

,,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineEndpoint (Change from Baseline)
F MDI 10 mcg BID44.87-6.18
MF MDI 400 mcg BID47.00-6.99
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID45.89-5.69
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID45.05-7.43
Placebo44.60-2.87

[back to top]

AUC(0-12 Hour) of the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in FEV1 for Each Body Mass Index (BMI) Subgroup

The average of the two predose FEV1 measurements (30 minutes prior to dosing and 0 hour, immediately prior to dosing) at the Baseline Visit were subtracted from each of the serial measurements over the 12-hour period. The AUC was calculated based on these changes from Baseline evaluations. BMI is a number calculated from a person's weight and height. The higher the number, the higher the amount of fat. The comparison was for MF/F vs placebo. Standard deviation was pooled. (NCT00383552)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

,,,
Interventionliters * hours (Least Squares Mean)
Less than 2525 to less than 3030 or more
F MDI 10 mcg BID4.344.263.13
MF MDI 100 mcg BID3.193.231.69
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID5.243.363.35
Placebo BID2.221.22-0.73

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM FEV1 Pre-dose Assessment, or Trough FEV1, at Week 12

Trough FEV1 is a measure of the end-of-dosing interval. The comparison was for MF/F vs F. Standard deviation was pooled. (NCT00383552)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

,,,
Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
F MDI 10 mcg BID2.470.11
MF MDI 100 mcg BID2.410.16
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID2.500.18
Placebo BID2.460.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proportion of Nights Across the Treatment Period With Nocturnal Awakenings Due to Asthma Which Require Use of Short-acting Beta Agonists (SABA)

Baseline is the proportion of nights of the last week (Days -7 to 1) prior to first dose with nocturnal awakenings. Scale is measured as 0 to 1 with 0=no awakenings to 1=awakenings every night. The comparison was for MF/F vs placebo. Standard deviation was pooled. (NCT00383552)
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint

,,,
InterventionProportion of Nights (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
F MDI 10 mcg BID0.15-0.03
MF MDI 100 mcg BID0.12-0.03
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID0.13-0.06
Placebo BID0.130.02

[back to top]

Mean Area Under the Time Curve From 0 to 12 Hours (AUC(0-12 Hours)) of Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Forced Expiratory Volume (Liters) in 1 Second (FEV1)

The average of the two predose FEV1 measurements (30 minutes prior to dosing and 0 hour, immediately prior to dosing) at the Baseline Visit were subtracted from each of the serial measurements over the 12-hour period. The AUC was calculated based on these changes from Baseline evaluations. The comparison was for MF/F vs MF. Standard deviation was pooled. (NCT00383552)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

,,,
Interventionliters * hours (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
F MDI 10 mcg BID4.093.83
MF MDI 100 mcg BID1.852.53
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID3.944.00
Placebo BID1.641.11

[back to top]

Median Time-to-first Severe Asthma Exacerbation Over the 26-week Treatment Period

Severe asthma exacerbation refers to an occurrence of a decrease below 80% of Baseline in FEV1, a decrease below 70% of Baseline in PEF on 2 consecutive days or a clinical deterioration of asthma resulting in emergency treatment, hospitalization or treatment with asthma medication. (NCT00383552)
Timeframe: Across the 26 week treatment period

InterventionDays (Median)
MF/F MDI 100/10 Mcg BID45.5
MF MDI 100 Mcg BID54
F MDI 10 Mcg BID51.5
Placebo BID27.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standarized Activities (AQLQ[S]) Total Score

AQLQ(S) consists of 32 questions each scaled from 1 (worst case) to 7 (best case). The comparison was for MF/F vs placebo. Standard deviation was pooled. (NCT00383552)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
F MDI 10 mcg BID5.600.15
MF MDI 100 mcg BID5.650.39
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID5.600.44
Placebo BID5.760.06

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least One Severe Asthma Exacerbation at Week 26

Severe asthma exacerbation refers to an occurrence of a decrease below 80% of Baseline in FEV1, a decrease below 70% of Baseline in PEF on 2 consecutive days and or a clinical deterioration of asthma resulting in emergency treatment, hospitalization or treatment with asthma medication. (NCT00383552)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionparticipants (Number)
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID30
MF MDI 100 mcg BID53
F MDI 10 mcg BID84
Placebo BID86

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Total Score

ACQ consists of seven questions each scaled from 0 (best case) to 6 (worst case). The comparison was for MF/F vs placebo. Standard deviation was pooled. (NCT00383552)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
F MDI 10 mcg BID1.38-0.12
MF MDI 100 mcg BID1.29-0.32
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID1.34-0.40
Placebo BID1.23-0.11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Partly Stable COPD

"Partly stable COPD was a composite measure that included the following COPD~outcomes: (1) No oral steroid rescue medication; (2) No AM or PM COPD weekly~average symptom score greater than 2 during at least 7 of 8 weeks; (3) No moderate or severe exacerbations; (4) No unscheduled visits due to COPD worsenings; (5) No study discontinuation due to treatment failure or treatment-related adverse event as determined by the investigator." (NCT00383721)
Timeframe: Endpoint (26 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID91
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID101
MF MDI 400 mcg BID92
F MDI 10 mcg BID98
Placebo87

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proportion of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Symptom-Free Nights (AM Diary Symptoms)

Prior to the use of study drug rescue medication (in the morning upon awakening) the participant evaluated the COPD symptoms of wheezing, cough, and difficulty breathing. A symptom-free night was defined as a combined score of 0 (no symptoms) across all three COPD symptoms evaluated the following morning. Proportion for Baseline included data from the last week before the first dose. Proportion for Endpoint included data across the entire 26-week treatment period. (NCT00383721)
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint (26 weeks)

,,,,
InterventionProportion of symptom-free nights (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineEndpoint (Change from Baseline)
F MDI 10 mcg BID0.250.13
MF MDI 400 mcg BID0.240.16
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID0.220.17
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID0.240.13
Placebo0.240.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in St George's Respiratory Questionaire (SGRQ) Total Score

"SGRQ consisted of 76 items aggregated into 3 component scores: symptoms~(frequency/severity), activity (cause or limited by breathlessness), impact (social functioning, psychological disturbances from airway disease), & total score. Best health scores have a low numeric value. All component scores & total score ranged from 0-100, with a higher score indicating greater disease burden. A 4-point increase over placebo (and Baseline) was considered the minimum clinically important difference. Endpoint was the last post-baseline non-missing result through the 26 week evaluation carried forward." (NCT00383721)
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint (26 weeks)

,,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineEndpoint (Change from Baseline)
F MDI 10 mcg BID46.27-4.93
MF MDI 400 mcg BID48.27-5.87
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID47.29-7.99
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID48.22-6.04
Placebo46.59-2.88

[back to top]

Mean Area Under the Time Curve From 0 to 12 Hours (AUC(0-12 Hours)) of Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Forced Expiratory Volume (Liters) in 1 Second (FEV1)

FEV1 AUC was standardized to liters. Endpoint was the last post-baseline non-missing result through Week 13 carried forward. (NCT00383721)
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint (13 weeks)

,,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineEndpoint (Change from Baseline)
F MDI 10 mcg BID1.1760.092
MF MDI 400 mcg BID1.2600.053
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID1.1950.139
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID1.1890.179
Placebo1.2050.018

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Mild, Moderate, or Severe COPD Exacerbations

"Mild = 12 or more inhalations/day of inhaled rescue medication or 2 or more~nebulized treatments/day of inhaled rescue medication. Moderate = treatment with~antibiotics or oral steroids. Severe = emergency room treatment or hospitalizations of survival curves. If an event was composed of multiple criteria, the most severe criteria was assigned to the event." (NCT00383721)
Timeframe: Endpoint (26 weeks)

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
MildModerateSevere
F MDI 10 mcg BID61332
MF MDI 400 mcg BID49295
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID53203
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID56243
Placebo64384

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 13 Endpoint in AM Predose FEV1

Endpoint was the last post-baseline non-missing result through Week 13 carried forward. (NCT00383721)
Timeframe: Baseline to Endpoint (13 weeks)

,,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineEndpoint (Change from Baseline)
F MDI 10 mcg BID1.1750.049
MF MDI 400 mcg BID1.2550.028
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID1.1940.063
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID1.1880.098
Placebo1.205-0.003

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in the Left Total Femur From the Averaged Baseline Value to the Averaged Value at the Endpoint of Treatment Time Point

The averaged baseline value is the average of the two scan results prior to treatment. The endpoint of treatment time point is the average of the last two valid post baseline BMD scans during the treatment period carried forward. (NCT00394355)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to ~ one year of treatment

Interventionpercentage of BMD (Mean)
MF DPI 200 mcg QD PM0.3
MF DPI 400 mcg QD PM0.2
FP MDI 250 mcg BID0.2
ML 10 mg QD PM0.5

[back to top]

Summary of Change From Baseline to Endpoint in FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second).

Mean percent change from Baseline (the last non-missing value prior to treatment) in pulmonary function test FEV1 from in-office visits and at Endpoint (last non-missing postbaseline value carried forward) (NCT00394355)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to ~ one year of treatment

Interventionpercentage of FEV1 (Mean)
MF DPI 200 mcg QD PM0.29
MF DPI 400 mcg QD PM0.38
FP MDI 250 mcg BID0.31
ML 10 mg QD PM0.19

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From the Averaged Baseline Value to the Endpoint of Treatment Time Point

The averaged baseline value is the average of the two scan results prior to treatment. The endpoint of treatment time point is the average of the last two valid post baseline BMD scans during the treatment period carried forward. (NCT00394355)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to ~ one year of treatment

Interventionpercentage of BMD (Mean)
MF DPI 200 mcg QD PM0.7
MF DPI 400 mcg QD PM0.9
FP MDI 250 mcg BID1.1
ML 10 mg QD PM1.2

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in the Femoral Neck BMD From the Averaged Baseline Value to the Averaged Value at the Endpoint of Treatment Time Point

The averaged baseline value is the average of the two scan results prior to treatment. The endpoint of treatment time point is the average of the last two valid post baseline BMD scans during the treatment period carried forward. (NCT00394355)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to ~ one year of treatment

Interventionpercentage of BMD (Mean)
MF DPI 200 mcg QD PM-0.2
MF DPI 400 mcg QD PM0.4
FP MDI 250 mcg BID-0.4
ML 10 mg QD PM-0.2

[back to top]

Onset-of-action Based on Change From Baseline FEV1 at the 5 Min Pulmonary Function Test (PFT) Assessment on Day 1

PFTs, including FEV1, were done on Day 1. Evaluations included 30 min before and immediately before the first dose, the mean of which was Baseline, and at intervals from 5 min to 12 hrs postdose. Onset of action was defined as statistically significant improvement of MF/F over F/SC in Change from Baseline FEV1 at the 5-min postdose evaluation on Day 1. The same series of PFTs were done at Week 12. Change from Baseline to Week 12 evaluations were calculated using the same Day 1 predose scores for Baseline. The Week-12 evaluation consisted of AUC FEV1 scores across the 12-hour postdose interval. (NCT00424008)
Timeframe: Baseline to 5 minutes post-dose on Day 1

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID0.20
F/SC DPI 250/50 mcg BID0.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Total Score at Week 12 Endpoint

The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) by Juniper et al. is a mean of 7 equally weighted composite scores; each scaled from 0=best case scenario to 6=worst case scenario on an integer scale. Composites include the following: How Often Woken by Asthma, How Bad Were Asthma Symptoms When You Woke, Activity Limitations, Shortness of Breath, Wheezing, Average Daily Short-Acting Beta 2-Agonist (SABA) Puffs, and physician-evaluated lung function. With the exception of physician-evaluated lung function collected at the visit, evaluations were over the last week recall period. (NCT00424008)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID-0.65
F/SC DPI 250/50 mcg BID-0.65

[back to top]

The Proportion of Symptom-free Days and Nights (Combined) Over the 12-week Treatment Period.

For each day of the evaluation period, symptoms were collected in the morning for the night's evaluation, and in the evening for the day's evaluation. Symptoms included coughing, wheezing, and difficulty breathing, each integer-scaled from 0=none to 3=severe. A symptom-free Day/Night is defined as a combined score of 0 across the morning and evening evaluations. The proportion of 0 scores across the Baseline period, and across the 12-week treatment period, is calculated to determine the overall proportion of symptom-free Days/Nights for each of these periods. (NCT00424008)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

,
InterventionProportion of symptom-free days/nights (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (over the last week prior to first dose)Actual proportion over the 12-wk treatment periodChange from Baseline to over the 12-wk tx period
F/SC DPI 250/50 mcg BID0.180.430.25
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID0.190.420.24

[back to top]

The Area Under the Curve From 0 to 12 Hours [AUC](0-12 hr) of the Change From Baseline to the Week 12 Endpoint in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

(NCT00424008)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionLiter x hour (Least Squares Mean)
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID3.43
F/SC DPI 250/50 mcg BID3.24

[back to top]

Skin Toxicity as Measured by a Dermatologic Quality-of-life Instrument (Skindex-16).

Patient-Reported Mean of the Maximum Total a Skindex-16 Toxicity Score per patient on a 0-6 scale during radiation treatment (Lower score indicates less toxicity). (NCT00438659)
Timeframe: During Radiation Treatment, up to a maximum of 11 weeks.

Interventionscore on a 0-6 scale (Mean)
Mometasone1.4
Placebo1.7

[back to top]

Adverse Events Assessed Clinically by NCI CTCAE v3.0

(NCT00438659)
Timeframe: During Radiation Treatment, up to a maximum of 9 weeks.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ARTHRALGIA: SevereBURN: MildBURN: ModerateBURN: SevereCELLULITES INFECTN: ModerateCOUGH: SevereDERMATOLOGY: MildDERMATOLOGY: ModerateDERMATOLOGY: SevereFATIGUE: ModeratePAIN: SeverePAIN-BREAST: ModeratePAIN-CHEST: ModeratePRURITUS: MildPRURITUS: ModeratePRURITUS: SevereSKIN ATROPHY: MildSKIN ATROPHY: ModerateSKIN HYPOPIGMENT: MildSKIN HYPOPIGMENT: ModerateSKIN IRRITATION: ModerateSKIN STRIAE: MildSKIN STRIAE: Moderate
Mometasone132601011800010361410151021
Placebo032521119321111501452081160

[back to top]

Adverse Events Reported by the Patient in the Symptom Experience Diary (SED).

Maximum SED score during radiation treatment per patient on a 0 to 10 scale (lower score is better) (NCT00438659)
Timeframe: During Radiation Treatment, up to a maximum of 11 weeks.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
RednessDry PeelingWet PeelingWeepingRashSwellingFatigueDecrease in colorBand, Stripes or Lines
Mometasone5.12.71.31.22.62.34.52.31.7
Placebo6.83.11.61.44.02.45.02.11.5

[back to top]

Incidence of Severe ( Grade >=3) Radiation Dermatitis

To compare incidence of severe (Grade ≥ 3) radiation dermatitis as measured by the CTCAE v3.0 for the mometasone and placebo arms. (NCT00438659)
Timeframe: During Radiation Treatment, up to a maximum of 9 weeks.

,
InterventionPaticipants (Number)
Did not experience grade >=3 radiation dermatitisExperience grade >=3 radiation dermatitis
Mometasone804
Placebo784

[back to top]

QOL Domains as Measured by LASA

Mean scores of Linear Analogue Sef-Assessment (LASA) Mental, physical, emotional, social, spiritual wel-being on a 0 (as bad as it can be) to 100 (as good as it can be) scale. (NCT00438659)
Timeframe: During Radiation Treatment, up to a maximum of 11 weeks.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Mental well-beingPhysical well-beingEmotional well-beingSocial well-beingSpiritual well-being
Mometasone8683858189
Placebo8479807784

[back to top]

Skin Toxicity as Measured by the Skin Toxicity Assessment Tool

Mean of the Maximum Patient Reported Skin Toxicity Assessment Tool (STAT) per patient on a 0 to 5 scale during radiation treatment. Lower scores indicate less toxicity. (NCT00438659)
Timeframe: During Radiation Treatment, up to a maximum of 9 weeks.

,
InterventionScore on a 0 to 5 scale (Mean)
STAT: Discomfort/BurningSTAT: ItchingSTAT: PullingSTAT: Discomfort/Tenderness
Mometasone1.51.51.02.1
Placebo2.12.21.42.5

[back to top]

Overall Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by Linear Analogue Self-Assessment (LASA)

Patient completed QOL assessment was the Linear Analogue Self-Assessment (LASA). This instrument consisted of 6 questions with responses ranging from 0 (poor QOL) to 100 (best QOL). (NCT00438659)
Timeframe: During Radiation Treatment, up to a maximum of 11 weeks.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone85
Placebo82

[back to top]

Mean Maximum Grade of Radiation Dermatitis by Treatment Arm.

Maximum grade of radiation dermatitis as measured by the Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE) for Adverse Events (AE), Version 3.0. Grade 1 (Mild AE), Grade 2 (Moderate AE), Grade 3 (Severe AE), Grade 4 (Life-threatening or disabling AE), Grade 5 (Death related to AE). (NCT00438659)
Timeframe: During Radiation Treatment, up to a maximum of 9 weeks.

InterventionGrade (Mean)
Mometasone1.2
Placebo1.3

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change of AM PEFR (Peak Exploratory Flow Rate) From Baseline to Week 12.

The AM PEFR measurement at the Baseline visit was compared to the AM PEFR measurement during the last visit at Week 12. The mean percent change was calculated. (NCT00442117)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercent Change of AM PEFR (Mean)
MF-DPI2.59
BUD-DPI1.93

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change of FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) From Baseline to Week 12.

The FVC measurement at the baseline was compared to the FVC measurement during the last visit at Week 12. The mean percent change was calculated. (NCT00442117)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercent Change of FVC (Mean)
MF-DPI-0.11
BUD-DPI-0.88

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change of Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) From Baseline to Week 12.

FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second) measurement at the Baseline visit was compared to the FEV1 measurement during the last visit at Week 12. The mean percent change was calculated. (NCT00442117)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercent Change of FEV1 (Mean)
MF-DPI-1.09
BUD-DPI-0.02

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change of Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) at (25-75% Interval) From Baseline to Week 12.

The FEF (25-75%) measurement at the baseline was compared to the FEF (25-75%) measurement during the last visit at Week 12. The mean percent change was calculated. (NCT00442117)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercent Change of FEF (Mean)
MF-DPI0.01
BUD-DPI1.72

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total Score at Endpoint (Last Post Baseline Evaluation Carried Forward)

The RQLQ consisted of 28 items that fell into the following seven domains: activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional. Each of the items was scored from 0 = not troubled to 6 = extremely troubled, and the total of the seven domains was the primary focus of this quality of life evaluation. The best possible score on this scale is 0 and the worst possible score on this scale is 42. The Endpoint was the last post baseline evaluation carried forward and was Day 15 for the majority of the participants. (NCT00453063)
Timeframe: Baseline and 15 days

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline RQLQ Total ScoreChange from Baseline in RQLQ Total Score
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)4.19-1.63
Placebo4.42-1.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Average AM Instantaneous (NOW) Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Averaged Over Days 2 to 15

TNSS was defined as the sum of the following four nasal symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal congestion/stuffiness, nasal itching, sneezing; each symptom scored on a scale of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. The best possible score on this scale is 0 and the worst possible score on this scale is 12. (NCT00453063)
Timeframe: Baseline and 15 days

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline TNSSChange from Baseline in TNSS
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)9.83-2.36
Placebo9.69-1.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM NOW Nasal Congestion Score Averaged Over Days 2 to 15

Nasal congestion was one of the symptoms measured in the TNSS and was scored on a scale of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. The best possible score on this scale is 0 and the worst possible score on this scale is 3. (NCT00453063)
Timeframe: Baseline and 15 days

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline Nasal Congestion ScoreChange from Baseline in Nasal Congestion Score
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)2.66-0.54
Placebo2.64-0.39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) Averaged Over Days 2 to 15

Participants were to measure nasal airflow twice daily (in the morning prior to study drug dosing and in the evening) using their PNIF meter. The highest of 3 assessments was to be recorded in the electronic diary. The PNIF meter limits were between 30 and 370 liters/minute. Normal values range between 100 and 150 liters/minute. A positive change from Baseline correlates with improved nasal air flow. (NCT00453063)
Timeframe: Baseline and 15 days

,
Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline PNIFChange from Baseline in PNIF
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)89.1110.15
Placebo88.858.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Average AM Instantaneous (NOW) Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) Averaged Over Days 2 to 15

TOSS was defined as the sum of the following three ocular symptoms: redness of eyes, itching/burning eyes, and tearing/watering eyes; each symptom scored on a scale of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. The best possible score on this scale is 0 and the worst possible score on this scale is 9. (NCT00453063)
Timeframe: Baseline and 15 days

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline TOSSChange from Baseline in TOSS
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)7.07-1.52
Placebo7.01-1.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average AM Instantaneous (NOW) Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) Averaged Over Days 2 to 15

TOSS was defined as the sum of the following three ocular symptoms: redness of eyes, itching/burning eyes, and tearing/watering eyes; each symptom scored on a scale of 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. The best possible score on this scale is 0 and the worst possible score on the scale is 9. (NCT00468312)
Timeframe: Screening through 15 days daily

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline TOSSChange from Baseline in TOSS
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)6.78-1.71
Placebo6.74-1.37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total Score at Endpoint (Last Post Baseline Evaluation Carried Forward)

The RQLQ consisted of 28 items that fell into the following seven domains: activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional. Each of the items was scored from 0 = not troubled to 6 = extremely troubled, and the total of the seven domains was the primary focus of this quality of life evaluation. The best possible score on this scale is 0 and the worst possible score on this scale is 42. The Endpoint was the last post baseline evaluation carried forward and was Day 15 for the majority of the participants. (NCT00468312)
Timeframe: Baseline and 15 days

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline RQLQ Total ScoreChange from Baseline in RQLQ Total Score
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)4.27-1.81
Placebo4.28-1.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM NOW Nasal Congestion Score Averaged Over Days 2 to 15

Nasal congestion was one of the symptoms measures in the TNSS and was scored on a scale of 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. The best possible score on this scale is 0 and the worst possible score on this scale is 3. (NCT00468312)
Timeframe: Screening through 15 days daily

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline Nasal Congestion Scorechange from Baseline in Nasal Congestion Score
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)2.60-0.59
Placebo2.62-0.39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) Averaged Over Days 2 to 15

Participants were to measure nasal airflow twice daily (in the morning prior to study drug dosing and in the evening) using their PNIF meter. The highest of 3 assessments was to be recorded in the electronic diary. The PNIF meter limits were between 30 and 370 liters/minute. Normal values range between 100 and 150 liters/minute. A positive change from Baseline correlates with improved nasal air flow. (NCT00468312)
Timeframe: Screening through 15 days daily

,
Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline PNIFChange from Baseline in PNIF
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)93.1216.55
Placebo91.9612.59

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average AM Instantaneous (NOW) Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Averaged Over Days 2 to 15

TNSS was defined as the sum of the following four nasal symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal congestion/stuffiness, nasal itching, and sneezing; each symptom scored on a scale of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. The best possible score on this scale is 0 and the worst possible score on this scale is 12. (NCT00468312)
Timeframe: Screening through 15 days daily

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline TNSSChange from Baseline in TNSS
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)9.31-2.54
Placebo9.31-1.66

[back to top]

The Change From Baseline in the Number of Apnea-hypopnea Episodes Per Hour (Apnea-hypopnea Index (AHI)

(NCT00491374)
Timeframe:

Intervention (Number)
Placebo0
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray0

[back to top]

Changes in the Total Nasal Symptom Severity Score (TNSS) at 6 Hours After Dosage Administration on Day 1

Value at 6 hours after dosage administration (Day 1) minus value at Baseline. Minimum threshold TNSS response defined as TNSS score ≥6 out of a possible 12 for combined nasal symptoms of congestion, sneezing, rhinorrhea & itching with a score ≥2 for nasal congestion. Rating of the severity of the individual signs/symptoms according to the following scale: 0=None, sign/symptom wasn't present; 1=Mild, sign/symptom was present, but not disturbing; 2=Moderate, sign/symptom definitely present, & disturbing some of the time; 3=Severe: sign/symptom very noticeable & very bothersome most of the time. (NCT00491504)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 hours following initial dosing

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray 200 mcg-2.01
Placebo-1.86

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Average AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 7 Days of Week 8.

Week 8 End = The last 7 days of data with the last day within the range of Days 51 to 64. (NCT00521599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 End

,,
Interventionliters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 8 End
MF DPI 1 x 200 mcg BID374.37.65
MF DPI 2 x 100 mcg BID361.86.03
Placebo BID348.4-7.93

[back to top]

Participant Total Combined Symptom (TCS) Score Over the Entire Grass Pollen Season (GPS)

The TCS is the sum of the rhinoconjunctivitis daily symptom score (DSS) and rhinoconjunctivitis daily medication score (DMS) averaged over the entire GPS. The TCS ranged from 0 (no symptoms and no rescue medication use) to 54 (most severe symptoms and maximum use of rescue medication), with increasing score indicating a higher level of symptom severity. The DSS is composed of 6 rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms with scores from 0 (best) to 18 (worst), with increasing score indicating increased severity. The DMS is composed of a sum of the scores associated with rescue medication use per day. The range for the DMS was 0 (no rescue medication use) to 36 (maximum use of rescue medication), with a lower score indicating less use of rescue medication. (NCT00550550)
Timeframe: From the Start of the GPS to the End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972434.62
Placebo6.25

[back to top]

Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Scores (DSS) Over the Entire GPS

The DSS is composed of six rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms which were recorded daily including runny nose, blocked nose, sneezing, itchy nose, gritty feeling/red/itchy, and watery eyes, and the symptoms were measured on a scale of 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptoms). A higher score indicated a higher level of symptoms and the total daily score could range from 0 (best) to 18 (worst). (NCT00550550)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to the End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972433.71
Placebo4.91

[back to top]

Participant Average Weekly Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total Score Over the Entire GPS

The RQLQ has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0 (best) to 6 (worst), with a higher score indicating more significant impairment. (NCT00550550)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to the End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972431.45
Placebo1.77

[back to top]

Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) Over the Entire GPS

The DMS is composed of a sum of the scores associated with rescue medication use per day. Rescue medications were implemented when a participant had a symptom score >= 4. Rescue medications for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were to be utilized in a step-wise fashion: loratadine, olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% opthalmic solution, mometasone, and prednisone, in that sequence. The score for the DMS ranged from 0 (no use of rescue medication) to 36 (maximum use of rescue medication). A lower medication score indicated less impact on symptoms and was suggestive of less use of rescue medication. (NCT00550550)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to the End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972430.91
Placebo1.33

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Bilateral Tympanogram Results of: Normal, Abnormal, or Not Done

Tympanometry was performed in children ages 2-11 by certified audiologists. Results were categorized based on audiologist's assessment as either being normal (normal pressure in the middle ear with normal mobility of the eardrum and the conduction bones) , abnormal (abnormal pressure in the middle ear and/or abnormal mobility of the eardrum and the conduction bones), or tympanometry was not done (evaluation not completed). Results were assessed at baseline, Week 4 (Visit 3), and endpoint Week 8 (end of treatment). (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Visit 2- Normal (n=66 MFNS, n=66 Placebo)Visit 2- Abnormal (n=66 MFNS, n=66 Placebo)Visit 2- Not Done (n=66 MFNS, n=66 Placebo)Visit 3- Normal (n=65 MFNS, n=65 Placebo)Visit 3- Abnormal (n=65 MFNS, n=65 Placebo)Visit 3- Not Done (n=65 MFNS, n=65 Placebo)Visit 4- Normal (n=62 MFNS, n=60 Placebo)Visit 4- Abnormal (n=62 MFNS, n=60 Placebo)Visit 4- Not Done (n=62 MFNS, n=60 Placebo)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)352564414745161
Placebo Nasal Spray3922533221039192

[back to top]

Rhinomanometry Results- Left and Right Nasal Fossa: Expiratory Resistance

"Rhinomanometry examination of the left & right Nasal Fossa was performed at baseline (visit 2) and each visit throughout treatment (visit 3 and visit 4) in participants ages 7-11 years.~Rhinomanometry is a test of nasal function that measures air pressure and the rate of airflow in the nasal airway during respiration by means of equipment. These findings were used to calculate expiratory nasal airway resistance reported in Pascal/centimeter^3/second (Pa/cm^3/sec)." (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
InterventionPa/cm^3/sec (Mean)
Visit 2- Left Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=20)Visit 3- Left Nasal Fossa (n=18, n=18)Visit 4- Left Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=19)Visit 2- Right Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=20)Visit 3- Right Nasal Fossa (n=18, n=18)Visit 4- Right Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=19)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)1.7712.93713.4882.6252.1890.961
Placebo Nasal Spray3.9941.4784.1481.0833.6462.792

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Otoscopic Results of: Normal or Abnormal

Otoscopic examination was performed of the right and left ear canals at baseline (visit 2) and each visit throughout treatment (visit 3 and visit 4). Results were categorized based on audiologist's assessment as either being normal (ear canal structures appear normal) or abnormal (ear canal structures appear abnormal). (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Right Otoscopy: Visit 2- Normal (n=66, n=66)Right Otoscopy: Visit 2- Abnormal (n=66, n=66)Right Otoscopy Visit 3- Normal (n=65, n=65)Right Otoscopy Visit 3- Abnormal (n=65, n=65)Right Otoscopy Visit 4- Normal (n=62, n=60)Right Otoscopy Visit 4- Abnormal (n=62, n=60)Left Otoscopy: Visit 2- Normal (n=66, n=66)Left Otoscopy: Visit 2- Abnormal (n=66, n=66)Left Otoscopy Visit 3- Normal (n=65, n=65)Left Otoscopy Visit 3- Abnormal (n=65, n=65)Left Otoscopy Visit 4- Normal (n=62, n=60)Left Otoscopy Visit 4- Abnormal (n=62, n=60)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)501654114913491751144814
Placebo Nasal Spray5115531252852145510528

[back to top]

Acoustic Rhinometry Results- Minimal Cross-Sectional Area: Left and Right Nasal Fossa

"Acoustic rhinometry examination of the left & right Nasal Fossa was performed by principal investigators at baseline & each visit throughout treatment in participants ages 7-11 years. Acoustic rhinometry is a technique intended for assessment of the geometry of the nasal cavity and nasopharynx and for evaluating nasal obstruction. The technique is based on an analysis of sound waves reflected from the nasal cavities.~Measurements were taken for each side of the nose (nasopharyngeal minimum cross-sectional area) & were reported in cm^3." (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
Interventioncm^3 (Mean)
Visit 2- Left Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=20)Visit 3- Left Nasal Fossa (n=18, n=18)Visit 4- Left Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=19)Visit 2- Right Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=20)Visit 3- Right Nasal Fossa (n=18, n=18)Visit 4- Right Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=19)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)0.5990.6080.6620.5320.5810.734
Placebo Nasal Spray0.4910.5940.6610.5770.5960.814

[back to top]

Total Severity Symptom Scores: Morning and Evening (AM & PM)

Symptoms were assessed by whole-number linear scale to grade their severity. Scores were recorded AM & PM (a difference of 12 hours) & were based on severity within 12 hours of prior recording. The following symptoms were evaluated: Snoring; Nasal obstruction & discharge; Breathing difficulty; Oral respiration; Ear pain. Severity was graded according to the following scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Severity was scored individually and summed to obtain the Total Symptom Severity Score. The maximum total score possible was 36 daily; 18 for both AM (6 symptoms times max severity of 3)and PM. (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 2 AM (n=66 MFNS, n=66 Placebo)Visit 3 AM (n=64 MFNS, n=65 Placebo)Visit 4 AM (n=62 MFNS, n=60 Placebo)Visit 2 PM (n=66 MFNS, n=66 Placebo)Visit 3 PM (n=64 MFNS, n=65 Placebo)Visit 4 PM (n=62 MFNS, n=60 Placebo)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)9.45.44.29.96.34.8
Placebo Nasal Spray9.96.45.510.27.05.7

[back to top]

Total Frequency Symptom Scores: AM & PM

Symptoms were assessed by whole-number linear scale to grade their frequency. Scores were recorded AM & PM (a difference of 12 hours) & were based on frequency within 12 hours of prior recording. The following signs/symptoms were evaluated: Snoring; Nasal obstruction; and nasal discharge; Breathing difficulty; Oral respiration; Ear pain. Frequency was graded according to the following scale: 0=absent; 1=intermittent; 2=persistent. The frequency of symptoms was scored individually and summed to obtain the Total Frequency Symptom Score. The maximum total score possible was 24 daily; 12 for both AM (6 symptoms times max frequency of 2) and PM. (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 2 AM (n=66 MFNS, n=66 Placebo)Visit 3 AM (n=64 MFNS, n=65 Placebo)Visit 4 AM (n=62 MFNS, n=60 Placebo)Visit 2 PM (n=66 MFNS, n=66 Placebo)Visit 3 PM (n=64 MFNS, n=65 Placebo)Visit 4 PM (n=62 MFNS, n=60 Placebo)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)7.34.43.77.65.34.1
Placebo Nasal Spray7.35.44.48.05.74.6

[back to top]

Rhinomanometry Results- Left and Right Nasal Fossa: Inspiratory Resistance

"Rhinomanometry examination of the left & right Nasal Fossa was performed at baseline (visit 2) and each visit throughout treatment (visit 3 and visit 4) in participants ages 7-11 years.~Rhinomanometry is a test of nasal function that measures air pressure and the rate of airflow in the nasal airway during respiration by means of equipment. These findings were used to calculate inspiratory nasal airway resistance reported in Pascal/centimeter^3/second (Pa/cm^3/sec)." (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
InterventionPa/cm^3/sec (Mean)
Visit 2- Left Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=20)Visit 3- Left Nasal Fossa (n=18, n=18)Visit 4- Left Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=19)Visit 2- Right Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=20)Visit 3- Right Nasal Fossa (n=18, n=18)Visit 4- Right Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=19)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)2.1116.34131.0742.9851.8232.560
Placebo Nasal Spray3.2801.93454.7246.5353.02643.621

[back to top]

Rhinomanometry Results- Left and Right Nasal Fossa: Inspiration Flow at 75 Pa

"Rhinomanometry examination of the left & right Nasal Fossa was performed at baseline (visit 2) and each visit throughout treatment (visit 3 and visit 4) in participants ages 7-11 years.~Rhinomanometry is a test of nasal function that measures air pressure and the rate of airflow in the nasal airway during respiration by means of equipment. Inspiration flow was calculated at 75 Pa." (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
Interventioncm^3/sec (Mean)
Visit 2- Left Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=20)Visit 3- Left Nasal Fossa (n=18, n=18)Visit 4- Left Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=19)Visit 2- Right Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=20)Visit 3- Right Nasal Fossa (n=18, n=18)Visit 4- Right Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=19)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)200.530222.152194.208183.562228.661215.400
Placebo Nasal Spray178.933151.268172.346161.958197.266183.368

[back to top]

Rhinomanometry Results- Left and Right Nasal Fossa: Expiratory Flow at 75 Pa

"Rhinomanometry examination of the left & right Nasal Fossa was performed at baseline (visit 2) and each visit throughout treatment (visit 3 and visit 4) in participants ages 7-11 years.~Rhinomanometry is a test of nasal function that measures air pressure and the rate of airflow in the nasal airway during respiration by means of equipment. Expiratory flow was calculated at 75 Pa." (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
Interventioncm^3/sec (Mean)
Visit 2- Left Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=20)Visit 3- Left Nasal Fossa (n=18, n=18)Visit 4- Left Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=19)Visit 2- Right Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=20)Visit 3- Right Nasal Fossa (n=18, n=18)Visit 4- Right Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=19)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)190.024225.911181.026160.531209.676195.108
Placebo Nasal Spray166.930173.139192.374166.302209.787176.587

[back to top]

Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Total Score (Ages 8-12)

The impact on quality of life (QOL) was measured by a general pediatric health questionnaire. Versions were self-administered & answered by participants' parents. This modular instrument consists of 23 items using a 5-point scale: from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. 4 dimensions (physical, emotional, social, & school functioning) are scored. Total score is sum of all the items over the number of items answered on all the scales. Higher scores indicate a better health related QOL. (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 2 (n= 15 MFNS, n=13 Placebo)Visit 3 (n=15 MFNS, n= 14 Placebo)Visit 4 (n=15 MFNS, n=13 Placebo)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)76.01482.97185.725
Placebo Nasal Spray76.83984.00683.946

[back to top]

Acoustic Rhinometry Results- Nasopharyngeal Volume (NPV): Left and Right Nasal Fossa

Acoustic rhinometry examination of the left & right Nasal Fossa was performed by principal investigators at baseline & each visit throughout treatment in participants ages 7-11 years. Acoustic rhinometry is a technique intended for assessment of the geometry of the nasal cavity and nasopharynx and for evaluating nasal obstruction. The technique is based on an analysis of sound waves reflected from the nasal cavities. (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
Interventioncm^3 (Mean)
Visit 2- Left Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=20)Visit 3- Left Nasal Fossa (n=18, n=18)Visit 4- Left Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=19)Visit 2- Right Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=20)Visit 3- Right Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=18)Visit 4- Right Nasal Fossa (n=19, n=19)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)4.2453.7253.6313.5664.1833.774
Placebo Nasal Spray4.1173.4893.0844.4894.8843.275

[back to top]

Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Total Score (Ages 2-4)

The impact on quality of life (QOL) was measured by a general pediatric health questionnaire. Versions were self-administered & answered by participants' parents. This modular instrument consists of 21 items using a 5-point scale: from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. 4 dimensions (physical, emotional, social, & school functioning) are scored. Total score is sum of all the items over the number of items answered on all the scales. Higher scores indicate a better health related QOL. (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 2 (n= 23 MFNS, n=29 Placebo)Visit 3 (n=22 MFNS, n= 28 Placebo)Visit 4 (n=18 MFNS, n=25 Placebo)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)78.44280.43880.137
Placebo Nasal Spray78.01778.48682.701

[back to top]

Obstructive Sleep Apnea-18 (OSA-18) Questionnaire Total Score

"18 items of the survey were graded on a 7-point ordinal scale. Caregivers were asked to describe how often in the last 4 weeks had the child exhibited specific symptoms according to the following scale: 1: none of the time; 2: hardly any of the time; 3: a little of the time; 4: some of the time; 5: a good bit of the time; 6: most of the time; 7: all of the time. All scores were summed (total score: 18-126).~Grading was as follows:~Scores < 60 suggest a slight impact on health related quality of life (HRQL)~Scores 60-80 suggest a moderate impact~Scores over 80 suggest a great impact" (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 2 (n=66 MFNS, n=65 Placebo)Visit 3 (n=65 MFNS, n= 65 Placebo)Visit 4 (n=62 MFNS, n= 59 Placebo)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)62.74247.13842.742
Placebo Nasal Spray60.16948.76943.068

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Rhinoscopic-Inferior Turbinates Results of: Normal, Hypertrophic, and Hypotrophic

Rhinoscopic examination of the inferior turbinates was performed at baseline (visit 2) and each visit throughout treatment (visit 3 and visit 4). Results were categorized based on investigator's assessment as either being normal appearance (normal size) , hypertrophic (swollen/normal size increased), or hypotrophic (normal size diminished). (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Visit 2- Normal Appearance (n=66, n=66)Visit 2 Hypertrophic (n=66, n=66)Vist 2 Hypotrophic (n=66, n=66)Visit 3 Normal Appearance (n=65, n=65)Visit 3 Hypertrophic (n=65, n=65)Visit 3 Hypotrophic (n=65, n=65)Visit 4 Normal Appearance (n=62, n=60)Visit 4 Hypertrophic (n=62, n=60)Visit 4 Hypotrophic (n=62, n=60)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)501604619045170
Placebo Nasal Spray462004817042180

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Rhinoscopic- Septum Results of: Aligned, Non-Obstructive, or Obstructive Deviation

Rhinoscopic examination of the septum was performed at baseline (visit 2) and each visit throughout treatment (visit 3 and visit 4). Results were categorized based on investigator's assessment as either being aligned (septum is aligned), non-obstructive (septum is not aligned but the deviation is non-obstructive), or obstructive (septum is deviated and obstructive) deviation. (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Visit 2 Aligned (n= 66, n=66)Visit 2 Non-obstructive Deviation (n= 66, n=66)Vist 2 Obstructive Deviation (n=66, n=66)Visit 3 Aligned (n=65, n=65)Visit 3 Non-obstructive Deviation (n=65, n=65)Visit 3 Obstructive Deviation (n=65, n=65)Visit 4 Aligned (n=62, n=60)Visit 4 Non-obstructive Deviation (n=62, n=60)Visit 4 -Obstructive Deviation (n=62, n=60)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)651064106110
Placebo Nasal Spray633062305730

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Rhinoscopic- Middle Meatus Results of: Patent, Partial Obstruction or Total Obstruction

Rhinoscopic examination of the middle meatus was performed at baseline (visit 2) and each visit throughout treatment (visit 3 and visit 4). Results were categorized based on investigator's assessment into 3 categories: patent (easily observed), partial obstruction (partially blocked from view), or total obstruction (completely blocked from view). (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Visit 2- Patent (n=66, n=66)Visit 2- Partial Obstruction (n=66, n=66)Visit 2- Total Obstruction (n=66, n=66)Visit 3- Patent (n=65, n=65)Visit 3- Partial Obstruction (n=65, n=65)Visit 3- Total Obstruction (n=65, n=65)Visit 4- Patent (n=62, n=60)Visit 4- Partial Obstruction (n= 62, n=60)Visit 4- Total Obstruction (n=62, n=60)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)623161405660
Placebo Nasal Spray605161225343

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Pure-Tone Audiometric Results of: Normal, Abnormal, or Not Done

Pure-tone audiometry was performed in children ages 7-11 by certified audiologists. Results were categorized based on audiologist's assessment as either being normal (within normal limits), abnormal (outside normal limits), or audiometry was not done (not performed). Results were assessed at baseline, Week 4 (Visit 3), and endpoint Week 8 (end of treatment). (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Visit 2- Normal (n=19 MFNS, n=21 Placebo)Visit 2- Abnormal (n=19 MFNS, n=21 Placebo)Visit 2- Not Done (n=19 MFNS, n= 21 Placebo)Visit 3- Normal (n=20 MFNS, n=21 Placebo)Visit 3- Abnormal (n=20 MFNS, n=21 Placebo)Visit 3- Not Done (n=20 MFNS, n=21 Placebo)Visit 4- Normal (n=19 MFNS, n=20 Placebo)Visit 4- Abnormal (n=19 MFNS, n=20 Placebo)Visit 4- Not Done (n=19 MFNS, n=20 Placebo)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)135115411522
Placebo Nasal Spray182120101820

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Adenoid/Choana (A/C) Index Grade

Changes in adenoid size were assessed by nasopharyngoscopic examination and were determined using the Adenoid/Choana (A/C) Index. Grades were assigned to intervals of A/C ratio percentages: grade I (0-25%), II (26-50%), III (51-75%) and IV (76-100%). Changes in adenoid size were expressed as the mean difference between grades at baseline and study visit. Positive values indicated a decrease in adenoid size, a 0 value indicated that size remained the same, and negative values indicated an increase in adenoid size. (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 2), Weeks 4 (visit 3), Week 8 (visit 4)

,
InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
Change at Visit 3 (n=65 MFNS, n=63 Placebo)Change at Visit 4 (n=61 MFNS, n=58 Placebo)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)0.30.4
Placebo Nasal Spray0.20.3

[back to top]

Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Total Score (Ages 5-7)

The impact on quality of life (QOL) was measured by a general pediatric health questionnaire. Versions were self-administered & answered by participants' parents. Questionnaire consists of 23 items using a 3-point scale: from 0 (not at all), 2 (sometimes), 4 (a lot). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. 4 dimensions (physical, emotional, social, & school functioning) are scored. Total score is sum of all the items over the number of items answered on all the scales. Higher scores indicate a better health related QOL. (NCT00552032)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 8 (Visit 4)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 2 (n= 28 MFNS, n=24 Placebo)Visit 3 (n=28 MFNS, n= 23 Placebo)Visit 4 (n=28 MFNS, n=22 Placebo)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS)78.1481.5683.54
Placebo Nasal Spray79.0384.0782.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM/PM Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (NOW TNSS) Averaged Over Days 1 to 15

Subjects scored severity of rhinorrhea, nasal congestion/stuffiness, nasal itching, and sneezing at the time of evaluation (NOW) using an ordinal scale from 0 = none to 3 = severe. Evaluations were performed daily in the morning (AM) and evening (PM). For each evaluation, individual symptom scores were summed to a TNSS, which was then averaged for a single score across the 15 day treatment period. (NCT00552110)
Timeframe: 15 days of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combination1-3.29
Combination3-3.36
Mometasone-2.97
Oxymetazoline-2.44
Placebo-1.90

[back to top]

Standardized Area Under the Curve From 0 to 4 Hours [AUC(0-4 hr)] of the Change From Baseline to Hour 4 on Day 1 in Nasal Congestion Score

Subjects scored nasal congestion/stuffiness using an ordinal scale from 0 = none to 3 = severe. Baseline was the average of the scores assessed every 15 minutes for 1 hour prior to dosing on Day 1. After dosing on Day 1, congestion was scored every 15 minutes for the 1st hour and every 30 minutes for the next 3 hours. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using the trapezoid rule, then standardization achieved by dividing the calculation by 4 hours. Treatment comparisons were examined using the standardized AUC(0-4 hr) of the change from baseline to hour 4 on Day 1. (NCT00552110)
Timeframe: from baseline to hour 4 on Day 1

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Combination1-0.80
Combination3-0.92
Mometasone-0.63
Oxymetazoline-1.06
Placebo-0.57

[back to top]

Change From Period Baseline in Peak Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

"Peak FEV1 was defined as the peak FEV1 up to 4 hours post-dose. The FEV1 percent predicted expresses FEV1 as a percentage of the predicted values for participants of similar characteristics (height, age, sex, and sometimes race and weight). A positive change from baseline in FEV1 % predicted indicates improvement in lung function. Change from baseline in peak FEV1 % predicted was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose value as covariate." (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Days 1, 8 and 15, pre-dose (Baseline) and 5, 15, and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose.

InterventionPercent of predicted (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone16.27
Placebo6.85
Fluticasone/Salmeterol16.49

[back to top]

Change From Period Baseline in Trough FEV1/FVC Ratio

The forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio represents the proportion of a person's vital capacity that they are able to expire in the first second of an expiration. Trough FEV1/FVC was calculated from measurements taken 24 hours post-dose. Change from baseline in trough FEV1/FVC ratio was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose value as covariate. (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Pre-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 1, 8 and 15) and 24-hours post-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 2, 9 and 16).

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone2.50
Placebo2.15
Fluticasone/Salmeterol2.65

[back to top]

Change From Period Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Trough FVC was measured 24 hours post-dose. Change form baseline in trough FVC was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose value as covariate. (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Pre-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 1, 8 and 15) and 24-hours post-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 2, 9 and 16).

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone0.22
Placebo-0.14
Fluticasone/Salmeterol0.17

[back to top]

Change From Period Baseline in Trough Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

"Trough FEV1 was measured 24 hours post-dose. The FEV1 percent predicted expresses FEV1 as a percentage of the predicted values for participants of similar characteristics (height, age, sex, and sometimes race and weight). A positive change from baseline in FEV1 % predicted indicates improvement in lung function. Change from baseline in trough FEV1 % predicted was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose value as covariate." (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Pre-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 1, 8 and 15) and 24-hours post-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 2, 9 and 16).

InterventionPercent of predicted (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone6.95
Placebo-2.87
Fluticasone/Salmeterol9.85

[back to top]

Change From Period Baseline to 24 Hour Post-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Change from the period baseline to 24 hour post dose trough FEV1 after 1 day of treatment was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose FEV1 as covariate. (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Pre-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 1, 8 and 15) and 24-hours post-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 2, 9 and 16).

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone0.27
Placebo-0.12
Fluticasone/Salmeterol0.37

[back to top]

Maximum (Peak) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Indacaterol

(NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Samples were taken pre-dose and at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone289

[back to top]

Maximum (Peak) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mometasone Furoate

(NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Samples were taken pre-dose and at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone47.3

[back to top]

Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Concentration Following Drug Administration for Mometasone Furoate

(NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Samples were taken pre-dose and at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionhours (Median)
Indacaterol/Mometasone1.05

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 12 Hours Post-dose for Mometasone Furoate

(NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Samples were taken pre-dose and at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, and 12 hours post-dose.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone287

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Indacaterol

(NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Samples were taken pre-dose and at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone1331

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Mometasone Furoate

(NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Samples were taken pre-dose and at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone389

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Peak FEV1 is defined as the peak FEV1 between 0 and 4 hours post-dose. The change from baseline in peak FEV1 was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose FEV1 as covariate. (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Days 1, 8 and 15, pre-dose (Baseline) and 5, 15, and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose.

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone0.64
Placebo0.26
Fluticasone/Salmeterol0.62

[back to top]

Change From Period Baseline in Peak FEV1/FVC Ratio

The forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio represents the proportion of a person's vital capacity that they are able to expire in the first second of an expiration. Peak FEV1/FVC was calculated from spirometry measurements taken up to 4 hours post-dose. Change from baseline in peak FEV1/FVC ratio was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose value as covariate. (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Days 1, 8 and 15, pre-dose (Baseline) and 5, 15, and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose.

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone2.86
Placebo2.53
Fluticasone/Salmeterol2.90

[back to top]

Change From Period Baseline in Peak Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Peak FVC was measured up to 4 hours post-dose. Change from baseline in peak FVC was modeled using a linear mixed effect model fitting treatment, sequence and period as fixed factors, patient within sequence as a random factor and pre-dose value as covariate. (NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Days 1, 8 and 15, pre-dose (Baseline) and 5, 15, and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose.

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone0.47
Placebo0.20
Fluticasone/Salmeterol0.35

[back to top]

Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Concentration Following Drug Administration for Indacaterol

(NCT00556673)
Timeframe: Samples were taken pre-dose and at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionhours (Median)
Indacaterol/Mometasone0.325

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) Between Baseline (Pre-dose) and 24 Hours Post-dose

"FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. FEV1 was measured pre-dose and up to 24 hours post-dose. The FEV1 standardized area under the curve (AUC) was analyzed for four time intervals:~Baseline (pre-dose) to 4 hours (hr) post-dosing;~Baseline (pre-dose) to 23 hours, 45 minutes (min) post-dosing;~11 hours, 10 minutes to 12 hours, 30 minutes post-dosing;~11 hours, 10 minutes to 23 hours, 45 minutes post-dosing.~AUC for FEV1 was analyzed using Analysis of Covariance adjusting for treatment, period, sequence and center with period baseline as a covariate and patient nested within sequence as a random effect." (NCT00557440)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 5, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4 hours, 11 hours 10 minutes, 11 hours 45 minutes, 12 hours 30 minutes, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 hours, 23 hours 10 minutes, and 23 hours 45 minutes post-dosing.

,,
Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline to 4 hours [N=36, 36, 37]Baseline to 23 hours, 45 minutes [N=36, 36, 37]11 hr, 10 min to 12 hr, 30 min [N=36, 35, 34]11 hr, 10 min to 23 hr, 45min [N=36, 36, 36]
Fluticasone/Salmeterol2.7132.6792.5852.696
Indacaterol/Mometasone2.7302.7182.6672.726
Placebo2.4692.4302.3142.470

[back to top]

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Single Time Points

"Vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible.~FVC was analyzed using ANCOVA adjusting for treatment, period, sequence and center with period baseline as a covariate and patient nested within sequence as a random effect." (NCT00557440)
Timeframe: 5, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4 hours, 11 hours 10 minutes, 11 hours 45 minutes, 12 hours 30 minutes, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 hours, 23 hours 10 minutes, and 23 hours 45 minutes post-dosing.

,,
Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
5 minutes [N= 36, 36, 37]30 minutes [N= 36, 36, 36]1 hour [N= 36, 36, 36]2 hours [N= 36, 36, 36]3 hours [N= 36, 36, 36]4 hours [N= 36, 36, 35]11 hours 10 minutes [N= 36, 35, 34]11 hours 45 minutes [N= 36, 35, 32]12 hours 30 minutes [N= 36, 35, 32]14 hours [N= 36, 35, 32]16 hours [N= 36, 35, 31]18 hours [N= 35, 36, 33]20 hours [N= 35, 36, 34]22 hours [N= 35, 36, 34]23 hours 10 minutes [N= 35, 36, 35]23 hours 45 minutes [N=36, 36, 34]
Fluticasone/Salmeterol3.8803.9333.9553.8993.9233.8613.8283.7363.8413.8943.7873.8663.8483.9063.8663.825
Indacaterol/Mometasone3.9173.9463.9454.0803.9253.8573.8963.8373.8333.9183.8963.8933.9033.8653.8703.866
Placebo3.8303.8393.8083.7423.7083.6653.6323.6073.6803.7593.7373.7843.7643.7643.8083.817

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Single Time Points

FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. FEV1 was analyzed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) adjusting for treatment, period, sequence and center with period baseline as a covariate and patient nested within sequence as a random effect. (NCT00557440)
Timeframe: 5, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4 hours, 11 hours 10 minutes, 11 hours 45 minutes, 12 hours 30 minutes, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 hours, 23 hours 10 minutes, and 23 hours 45 minutes post-dosing.

,,
Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
5 minutes [N=36, 36, 37]30 minutes [N=36, 36, 36]1 hour [N=36, 36, 36]2 hours [N=36, 36, 36]3 hours [N=36, 36, 36]4 hours [N=36, 36, 35]11 hours 10 minutes [N=36, 35, 34]11 hours 45 minutes [N=36, 35, 32]12 hours 30 minutes [N=36, 35, 32]14 hours [N=36, 35, 32]16 hours [N=36, 35, 31]18 hours [N=35, 36, 33]20 hours [N=35, 36, 34]22 hours [N=35, 36, 34]23 hours 10 minutes [N=35, 36, 35]23 hours 45 minutes [N=36, 36, 34]24 hours post-dose trough [N=36, 36, 35]
Fluticasone/Salmeterol2.6322.7192.7712.7342.7242.6692.5702.5182.6592.7792.6812.7172.7072.6952.6762.6402.656
Indacaterol/Mometasone2.7132.7542.7602.7542.7282.7052.6852.6282.6672.7662.7202.7292.7252.6742.6962.6862.689
Placebo2.5542.5272.5252.4832.4252.3762.2952.2762.3592.4852.4542.5132.4792.4872.5302.5232.524

[back to top]

Change From Period Baseline to 24 Hour Post-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Change from the period baseline to 24 hour post dose trough FEV1 after 1 day of treatment was analyzed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) adjusting for treatment, period, sequence and center with period baseline as a covariate and patient nested within sequence as a random effect. (NCT00557440)
Timeframe: Pre-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 1, 8 and 15) and 24-hours post-dose for each Treatment Period (Days 2, 9 and 16).

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone0.081
Fluticasone/Salmeterol0.049
Placebo-0.083

[back to top]

Time to Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

"FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Time to peak FEV1 is calculated in minutes from the time of inhalation of study drug to the time of the peak FEV1 during the first 4 hours post-dose.~Time to peak FEV1 is based on log-transformed analysis of variance adjusted for treatment, period, sequence and center, with patient nested within sequence as a random effect. Geometric Mean was obtained by taking anti-logs of the adjusted means from the model and standard error was calculated using the delta method." (NCT00557440)
Timeframe: Up to 4 hours post-dose

Interventionminutes (Geometric Mean)
Indacaterol/Mometasone87.4
Fluticasone/Salmeterol67.7
Placebo22.3

[back to top]

Participant Average Weekly Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (RQLQ(S)) Total Score Over the Entire GPS

The RQLQ(s) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment. (NCT00562159)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972431.30
Placebo1.57

[back to top]

Participant Total Combined Symptom (TCS) Score Over the Entire Grass Pollen Season (GPS)

The TCS is the sum of the rhinoconjunctivitis daily symptom score (DSS) and rhinoconjunctivitis daily medication score (DMS) averaged over the entire GPS. The TCS ranged from 0-54, with increasing score indicating a higher level of symptom severity. The DSS is composed of 6 rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms with scores from 0-18, with increasing score indicating increased severity. The DMS is composed of a sum of the scores associated with rescue medication use per day. The range for the DMS was 0-36, with a lower score indicating less use of rescue medication. (NCT00562159)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972435.08
Placebo6.39

[back to top]

Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) Over the Entire GPS

The DMS is composed of a sum of the scores associated with rescue medication use per day. Rescue medications were implemented when a participant had a symptom score >= 4. Rescue medications for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were to be utilized in a step-wise fashion: loratadine, olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% opthalmic solution, mometasone, and prednisone, in that sequence. The score for the DMS ranged from 0-36. A lower medication score indicated less impact on symptomology and was suggestive of less use of rescue medication. (NCT00562159)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972431.25
Placebo1.70

[back to top]

Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS) Over the Entire GPS

The DSS is composed of six rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms which were recorded daily including runny nose, blocked nose, sneezing, itchy nose, gritty feeling/red/itchy, and watery eyes, and the symptoms were measured on a scale of 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptoms). A higher score indicated a higher level of symptoms and the total daily score could range from 0 to 18. (NCT00562159)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972433.83
Placebo4.69

[back to top]

The Change of the Rhinasthma Global Summary Score From Baseline to Endpoint After 28 Days of Treatment.

To explore the efficacy of mometasone furoate nasal spray in comparison with placebo in improving the quality of life of subjects with moderate-severe PER and intermittent asthma as measured by the Rhinasthma Questionnaire (Global Summary Score). The Rhinasthma is a questionnaire that consists of 30 items and for each of them subjects had to indicate on a Likert scale (1=not at all; 5=very much) the degree of limitation or discomfort caused by each problem. Possible total best score = 150 and possible total worst score = 30. (NCT00599027)
Timeframe: Baseline and 28 days of treatment

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEndpoint after 28 days of treatment
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray25.3-10.3
Placebo Nasal Spray26.70.4

[back to top]

End of Use Agreement: Number of Inhalers With an End of Use Agreement of 0 (Completer Population)

The difference in the final MDI dose counter readout and the total number of recorded actuations at the end-of-use. Dose Counter end-of-use agreement was calculated as the sum of the absolute difference between the final dose counter readout and the number of recorded actuations across all participants who used at least 90% of the labeled actuations (excluding participants who used the inhaler beyond the labeled number of actuations) divided by the total number of participants in this population. No participant used more than two inhalers during the treatment period. (NCT00604500)
Timeframe: 4-week Treatment Period

InterventionNumber of inhalers (Number)
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID (With Dose Counter)175

[back to top]

Overall Quartile Discrepancy Rate

"Quartile discrepancies refer to the difference between~the participant-recorded number of actuations and the participant-recorded~counter readout at each of the 4 weekly visit intervals [ie, quartiles] to~evaluate whether there was any difference in agreement over the life of~the inhaler. The Quartile Discrepancy Rate was calculated as 100 multiplied by the total number of discrepancies per Quartile across all participant who used at least 90% of the labeled actuations divided by the total number of actuations per Quartile in the same population." (NCT00604500)
Timeframe: 4-week Treatment Period

Interventiondiscrepancies per 100 actuations (Number)
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID (With Dose Counter)0.13

[back to top]

Overall Discrepancy Size

Discrepancy Size refers to the magnitude of the discrepancy between the dose counter readout and the number of recorded actuations (definition of discrepancy). Overall Discrepancy Size was calculated as 100 multiplied by the sum of the absolute values from each Dose Counter Discrepancy Size across all participants who used at least 90% of the labeled actuations divided by the total number of recorded actuations in the same participant population. (NCT00604500)
Timeframe: 4-week Treatment Period

InterventionDiscrepancy Size Per 100 actuations (Number)
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID (With Dose Counter)0.14

[back to top]

Overall Discrepancy Rate

Overall discrepancies refer to the difference between the participant-recorded number of actuations and the participant-recorded dose counter readout across the 4-week Treatment Period. The Overall Discrepancy Rate was calculated as 100 multiplied by the total number of discrepancies across all participants who used at least 90% of the labeled actuations divided by the total number of actuations in the same participant population (Completer Population). (NCT00604500)
Timeframe: 4-week Treatment Period

InterventionOverall discrepancies per 100 actuations (Number)
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID (With Dose Counter)0.13

[back to top]

Levels of Plasma Glucose Over Time

At the specified time-points, blood samples were collected for measurement of plasma glucose and the samples analyzed by a central laboratory. The end of study visit was conducted approximately 5-9 days after the last dose. (NCT00605306)
Timeframe: Baseline; Days 1 and 14 at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 hours post-dose; 12 and 24 hours post dose (Day 2); study completion (5-9 days after last dose, Day 19-23).

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Baseline (N=14, 14)Day 1, pre-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 0.25 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 1 hour post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 2 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 4 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 12 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 24 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 14, pre-dose (N=14, 14)Day 14, 0.25 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 0.5 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 1 hour post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 2 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 4 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)End of study (N=14, 13)
Indacaterol Maleate/Mometasone Furoate5.0795.0575.0074.9505.0365.0577.0645.2215.2935.1295.1365.1575.1365.0936.9295.257
Placebo5.1575.2365.2645.2075.1935.1796.7935.2865.3215.2214.9004.9464.9624.9087.4085.731

[back to top]

Levels of Serum Cortisol Over Time

At the specified time-points, blood samples were collected for measurement of serum cortisol and the samples analyzed by a central laboratory. The end of study visit was conducted approximately 5-9 days after the last dose. (NCT00605306)
Timeframe: Baseline; Days 1 and 14 at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 11, 12, 13 hours post-dose; 24 hours post dose (Day 2); study completion (5-9 days after last dose, Day 19-23).

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Baseline (N=14, 14)Day 1, pre-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 0.25 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 1 hour post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 2 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 4 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 11 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 12 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 13 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 24 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 14, pre-dose (N=14, 14)Day 14, 0.25 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 0.5 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 1 hour post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 2 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 4 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 15, 11 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 15, 12 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 15, 13 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)End of study (N=14, 14)
Indacaterol Maleate/Mometasone Furoate466.214159.643153.786130.14399.14365.35755.929362.500289.929335.214136.857126.071111.50099.50082.78662.07148.214242.143255.500324.857495.286
Placebo441.143140.714151.000130.571131.92984.286102.071478.214404.214370.071193.500122.857127.231121.154106.38594.154102.154417.000388.769385.769417.786

[back to top]

Levels of Serum Potassium Over Time

At the specified time-points, blood samples were collected for measurement of serum potassium and the samples analyzed by a central laboratory. The end of study visit was conducted approximately 5-9 days after the last dose. (NCT00605306)
Timeframe: Baseline; Days 1 and 14 at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 hours post-dose; 12 and 24 hours post-dose (Day 2); study completion (5-9 days after last dose, Day 19-23).

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Baseline (N=14, 14)Day 1, pre-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 0.25 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 0.5 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 1 hour post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 2 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 1, 4 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 12 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 2, 24 hours post-dose (N=14, 14)Day 14, pre-dose (N=14, 14)Day 14, 0.25 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 0.5 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 1 hour post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 2 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)Day 14, 4 hours post-dose (N=14, 13)End of study (N=14, 14)
Indacaterol Maleate/Mometasone Furoate4.2714.2644.2934.1504.1434.1573.9794.4364.2934.1504.0643.9863.9863.9863.8004.364
Placebo4.3364.2794.3144.1794.1714.0933.9294.5004.3864.1364.0924.0924.0384.0383.7924.429

[back to top]

Participants With Adverse Events

"An adverse event (AE) is the appearance or worsening of any undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition occurring after starting the study drug even if the event is not considered to be related to study drug. Abnormal laboratory values or test results constitute adverse events only if they induce clinical signs or symptoms, are considered clinically significant, or require intervention.~A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an event which is fatal or life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or is medically significant, i.e., defined as an event that jeopardizes the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above." (NCT00605306)
Timeframe: 15 days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventSerious adverse eventAE resulting in discontinuation
Indacaterol Maleate/Mometasone Furoate900
Placebo1201

[back to top]

Changes in RQLQ: Non-Nasal/Eye

The RQLQ non-nasal/eye range: 0-6. Higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. (NCT00618332)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate-1.11
Placebo-1.26

[back to top]

Changes in RQLQ: Eye

The RQLQ eye range: 0-6. Higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. (NCT00618332)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate-1.36
Placebo-1.34

[back to top]

Changes in RQLQ: Emotional

The RQLQ emotional range: 0-6. Higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. (NCT00618332)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate-1.05
Placebo-0.94

[back to top]

Changes in RQLQ: Activity

The RQLQ activity range: 0-6. Higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. (NCT00618332)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate-1.73
Placebo-1.55

[back to top]

Changes in RQLQ: Nasal

The RQLQ nasal range: 0-6. Higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. (NCT00618332)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate-1.54
Placebo-1.31

[back to top]

Global Assessment

"Global Assessment: 3=significantly improved, 2=moderately improved,~1=mildly improved, 0=no change, -1=mildly worse, -2=moderately worse, and -3=significantly worse" (NCT00618332)
Timeframe: at week 2

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate1.7
Placebo1.4

[back to top]

Changes in RQLQ: Sleep

The RQLQ sleep range: 0-6. Higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. (NCT00618332)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate-1.42
Placebo-0.85

[back to top]

Changes in RQLQ: Practical

The RQLQ practical range: 0-6. Higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. (NCT00618332)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate-1.37
Placebo-1.48

[back to top]

Changes in RQLQ: Overall

The RQLQ is a disease-specific measure of a patient's quality of life. It includes domains that measure nasal and eye symptoms as well as those of activity, sleep, non-nasal/eye symptoms, practical and emotional measures. A scale of 0-6 is used to record the patient responses, with lower scores reflecting a better quality of life. The average score of each domain is calculated as well as an overall domain score reflecting the average of all scores. (NCT00618332)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate-1.35
Placebo-1.25

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol Challenge

Mannitol challenge (also referred to as PD15) is the provocative dose of mannitol required to produce a 15% reduction in the forced expiratory volume (in liters) in one second (FEV1). (NCT00635882)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 15

,,,,,
Interventionmilligrams (Mean)
BaselineMean Change from Baseline to Day 15
MF DPI 200 mcg137.6159.4
MF MDI 200 mcg126.0146.2
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg102.2176.6
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg48.6153.8
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg67.9162.9
Placebo159.4-63.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15

Twice daily, participants rated the following asthma symptoms as experienced during the time period since the last evaluation: wheezing, difficulty breathing, and cough on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe, very uncomfortable and interfered with most or all of normal daily activities/sleep). The total asthma symptom score ranged from 0 to 9. The results were recorded in the participant's diary. (NCT00635882)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 1-15

,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineMean Change from Baseline to Days 1-15
MF DPI 200 mcg1.6-1.1
MF MDI 200 mcg1.6-0.7
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg1.7-0.4
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg1.1-0.6
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg2.1-1.4
Placebo1.7-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15

(NCT00635882)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 1-15

,,,,,
Interventionliters/minute (Mean)
BaselineMean Change from Baseline to Days 1-15
MF DPI 200 mcg484.420.2
MF MDI 200 mcg472.528.3
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg462.047.7
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg437.234.5
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg486.766.8
Placebo422.74.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15

Twice daily, participants rated the following asthma symptoms as experienced during the time period since the last evaluation: wheezing, difficulty breathing, and cough on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe, very uncomfortable and interfered with most or all of normal daily activities/sleep). The total asthma symptom score ranged from 0 to 9. The results were recorded in the participant's diary. (NCT00635882)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 2-15

,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineMean Change from Baseline to Days 2-15
MF DPI 200 mcg1.5-1.2
MF MDI 200 mcg1.1-0.5
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg1.6-0.7
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg1.2-0.7
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg2.2-1.5
Placebo1.4-0.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15

(NCT00635882)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 2-15

,,,,,
Interventionliters/minute (Mean)
BaselineMean Change from Baseline to Days 2-15
MF DPI 200 mcg466.330.3
MF MDI 200 mcg473.330.8
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg452.648.1
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg421.246.9
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg468.769.8
Placebo413.2-9.0

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Sputum Eosinophil Count (Percentage)

(NCT00635882)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 14

Interventionpercentage of Sputum Eosinophil Count (Mean)
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg21.1
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg-35.5
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg-75.4
MF DPI 200 mcg-55.3
MF MDI 200 mcg-33.7
Placebo71.7

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)

(NCT00635882)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 14

Interventionpercentage of eNO (Mean)
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg-35.3
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg-45.4
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg-61.4
MF DPI 200 mcg-51.3
MF MDI 200 mcg-46.1
Placebo0.1

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 7 in eNO Ppb

(NCT00635882)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 7

Interventionpercentage of eNO (Mean)
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg-37.9
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg-39.7
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg-45.6
MF DPI 200 mcg-46.0
MF MDI 200 mcg-37.2
Placebo4.8

[back to top]

Baseline Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)

(NCT00635882)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionppb (Mean)
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg54.8
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg70.0
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg77.1
MF DPI 200 mcg102.6
MF MDI 200 mcg66.2
Placebo79.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Days With Asthma Control

To determine the effect of 2 weeks of treatment with inhaled montelukast plus mometasone and mometasone alone on asthma control assessed by average percentage of days with asthma control over the 2 week treatment period; measurements taken at 1 and 2 weeks contributed to the average. (NCT00666679)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Days (Least Squares Mean)
Montelukast + Mometasone35.13
Placebo + Mometasone29.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume; Volume of Air That is Exhaled During the First Second of a Forced Exhalation)

To determine the effect of 2 weeks of treatment with inhaled montelukast plus mometasone and mometasone alone on bronchodilation assessed by average change from baseline in FEV1 over the 2 week treatment period; measurements taken at 1 and 2 weeks contributed to the average. (NCT00666679)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

InterventionL (Liter) (Least Squares Mean)
Montelukast + Mometasone0.22
Placebo + Mometasone0.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Nighttime Asthma Symptom Score

To determine the effect of 2 weeks of treatment with inhaled montelukast plus mometasone and mometasone alone on asthma symptoms assessed by average change from baseline in nighttime asthma symptom score (which could range from 0 [best] to 3 [worst]) over the 2 week treatment period; measurements taken at 1 and 2 weeks contributed to the average. (NCT00666679)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Montelukast + Mometasone-0.28
Placebo + Mometasone-0.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume; Volume of Air That is Exhaled During the First Second of a Forced Exhalation) in Patients Who Met Lung Function Eligibility Criteria Specifically at the Randomization Visit.

To determine the effect of 2 weeks of treatment with inhaled montelukast plus mometasone and mometasone alone on bronchodilation assessed by average change from baseline in FEV1 over the 2 week treatment period in patients who met lung function eligibility criteria at randomization; measurements taken at 1 and 2 weeks contributed to average. (NCT00666679)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 Weeks

InterventionL (Liter) (Least Squares Mean)
Montelukast + Mometasone0.27
Placebo + Mometasone0.19

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Daily β-agonist Use

To determine the effect of 2 weeks of treatment with inhaled montelukast plus mometasone and mometasone alone on as-needed β-agonist use assessed by average change from baseline in total daily β-agonist use over the 2 week treatment period; measurements taken at 1 and 2 weeks contributed to the average. (NCT00666679)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

InterventionPuffs (Least Squares Mean)
Montelukast + Mometasone-0.87
Placebo + Mometasone-0.27

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Daytime Asthma Symptom Score

To determine the effect of 2 weeks of treatment with inhaled montelukast plus mometasone and mometasone alone on asthma symptoms assessed by average change from baseline in daytime asthma symptom score (which could range from 0 [best] to 6 [worst]) over the 2 week treatment period; measurements taken at 1 and 2 weeks contributed to the average. (NCT00666679)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Montelukast + Mometasone-0.39
Placebo + Mometasone-0.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Peripheral Blood Eosinophils

To determine the effect of 2 weeks of treatment with inhaled montelukast plus mometasone and mometasone alone on change from baseline in total peripheral blood eosinophils during the 2 week treatment period. (NCT00666679)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

Intervention10^3/microliter (Least Squares Mean)
Montelukast + Mometasone-0.05
Placebo + Mometasone0.02

[back to top]

Percentage of Days With Asthma Exacerbations

To determine the effect of 2 weeks of treatment with inhaled montelukast plus mometasone and mometasone alone on worsening of asthma assessed by percentage of days with asthma exacerbations during the 2 week treatment period. (NCT00666679)
Timeframe: 2 Weeks

InterventionPercentage of Days (Least Squares Mean)
Montelukast + Mometasone9.71
Placebo + Mometasone15.14

[back to top]

Number of Items in the Asthma Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire and the General QOL Questionnaire That Had a Significant (Positive) Change From Baseline to Endpoint

"Questionnaires consisted of items such as General Health Condition (excellent/very good/good/regular/bad), Difficulty to Breathe (always/almost always/considerable part of time/partially/few amount of time/almost never/never), General Asthma Limitations (completely/a lot/enough to be considered/regular/a few/almost nothing/nothing), etc...~The questionnaires together consisted of 44 questions, each question with categorical variables as response. A Friedman test was performed to determine the significance of change in samples from baseline to endpoint, for each question." (NCT00687531)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Week 12

Interventionquestions (Number)
Mometasone Furoate41

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Adhered to Treatment

The compliance was measured via medication consumption. In the end of the last week of study (Week 12), a review of the remaining study drug in the initial prescribed Twisthaler device was done. A Twisthaler reading of 0 indicates no study drug left and full compliance. (NCT00687531)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Twisthaler reading 0 (zero)Twisthaler reading above zeroNot specified
Mometasone Furoate1962925

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

Spirometry was performed to measure FEV1, which is the amount of air the participant is able to exhale in 1 second. Normal values for FEV1 in healthy people depend on age and gender, but values between 80% and 120% of the normal value is considered good. Increased FEV1 indicates improvement in asthma control. (NCT00687531)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Week 12

InterventionLiters (Mean)
Initial (Day 1)Final (Week 12)
Mometasone Furoate2.182.6

[back to top]

Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)

Participants were to record their daily AM and PM PEFR values in a diary. PEFR can be measured using a peak flow meter that was given to the participant. Normal readings are based on a person's gender, age, and height. A reading of 80 to 100% of the usual or normal peak flow readings indicate that the asthma is under good control. Increased PEFR indicates improvement in asthma control. (NCT00687531)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Week 12

InterventionLiters/minute (Mean)
Initial AM (Day 1)Initial PM (Day 1)Final AM (Week 12)Final PM (Week 12)
Mometasone Furoate313.3311.12393.3395.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams to 12 Months

Examination of head and neck (scale: None, Mild, Moderate, Severe) for Epistaxis, Mucosal Edema, Nasal Discharge, Mucosal erythema, Mucosal Bleeding, and Crusting of mucosa. Nasal irritation was rated: 0 = None, Grade 1A = focal irritation, Grade 1B = superficial mucosal erosion, Grade 2 = moderate mucosal erosion, Grade 3 = ulceration, Grade 4 = septal perforation (NCT00720382)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Epistaxis - Day 1Epistaxis - Month 12/ETNasal Irritation - Day 1Nasal Irritation - Month 12/ETNoneGrade 1AGrade 1BGrade 2Grade 3Grade 4Conjunctival injection - Day 1Conjunctival injection - Month 12/ETErythematous TM - Day 1Erythematous TM - Month 12/ETMildLymphadenophthy-Day 1Lymphadenopathy - Month 12/ETMucosal Edema - Day 1SevereMucosal Edema - Month 12/ETNasal Discharge - Day 1Nasal Discharge - Month 12/ETModerateMucosal Erythema - Day 1Mucosal Erythema - Month 12/ETMucosal Bleeding - Day 1Mucosal Bleeding - Month 12/ETCrusting of Mucosa - Day 1Crusting of Mucosa - Month 12/ET
Nasonex®23722980022021370023721717300022020017200123716458141220182317023622681122020612202372251200220210910237428796122205494666237891103352209010722123714567214220142582002372241111220208111023721520112201972210

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Months in the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Compared to Placebo in Subjects 18 Years of Age and Older

"A 28-item RQLQ was completed on Day 1, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, month 9 and month 12 or Early termination. The RQLQ consists of 7 domains rated on a 7 point scale with 0 being not troubled by the allergy symptoms, and 6 being extremely troubled/all of the time.~Domain score will be calculated from the mean score of all items in the domain. Overall score will be calculated from the mean score of all items." (NCT00720382)
Timeframe: change from baseline to 12 months

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Overall Score BaselineMonth 1Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12/ET
Astepro 0.15%2.78-0.97-1.15-1.13-1.17-0.90
Nasonex®2.75-0.97-1.27-1.29-1.31-1.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams to 12 Months

Examination of head and neck (scale: None, Mild, Moderate, Severe) for Epistaxis, Mucosal Edema, Nasal Discharge, Mucosal erythema, Mucosal Bleeding, and Crusting of mucosa. Nasal irritation was rated: 0 = None, Grade 1A = focal irritation, Grade 1B = superficial mucosal erosion, Grade 2 = moderate mucosal erosion, Grade 3 = ulceration, Grade 4 = septal perforation (NCT00720382)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Epistaxis - Day 1Epistaxis - Month 12/ETNoneNasal Irritation - Day 1Grade 3Grade 4Nasal Irritation - Month 12/ETGrade 1AGrade 1BGrade 2Conjunctival injection - Day 1MildConjunctival injection - Month 12/ETErythematous TM - Day 1Erythematous TM - Month 12/ETLymphadenophthy-Day 1Lymphadenopathy - Month 12/ETMucosal Edema - Day 1Mucosal Edema - Month 12/ETModerateNasal Discharge - Day 1Nasal Discharge - Month 12/ETMucosal Erythema - Day 1Mucosal Erythema - Month 12/ETSevereMucosal Bleeding - Day 1Mucosal Bleeding - Month 12/ETCrusting of Mucosa - Day 1Crusting of Mucosa - Month 12/ET
Astepro 0.15%4664561000402387150046642537220040237422420046634010024240233656824664432120402392910465433302040238813104669216218131402101157129154661782027884021821635344662581535414022541143134664511500402384171046641246804023732090

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average AM/PM PRIOR Nasal Congestion Score Over 15 Days

Nasal congestion was scored on a scale of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. PRIOR (the subject's status over the previous 12 hours [reflective]). Baseline is the average score from the 3 days prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT00728416)
Timeframe: 15 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-0.71
Placebo Nasal Spray-0.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average AM/PM PRIOR Total Nasal Symptom Score Over 15 Days

Total nasal symptom score (TNSS) is a composite of 4 symptoms, each is scored on a scale of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The total can range from 0 to 12. PRIOR (the subject's status over the previous 12 hours [reflective]). Baseline is the average score from the 3 days prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT00728416)
Timeframe: 15 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-3.00
Placebo Nasal Spray-1.73

[back to top]

The Change From Baseline in Average AM/PM PRIOR Nasal Congestion Score Over 15 Days

Nasal congestion was scored on a scale of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe symptoms. PRIOR (the subject's status over the previous 12 hours [reflective]) (NCT00732381)
Timeframe: 15 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-0.64
Placebo Nasal Spray-0.49

[back to top]

The Change From Baseline in Average AM/PM PRIOR Total Nasal Symptom Score Over 15 Days

Total nasal symptom score (TNSS) is a composite of 4 symptoms, each is scored on a scale of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The total can range from 0 to 12. PRIOR (the subject's status over the previous 12 hours [reflective]) (NCT00732381)
Timeframe: 15 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-2.68
Placebo Nasal Spray-1.85

[back to top]

The Change From Baseline in Average AM/PM PRIOR Total Nasal Symptom Score Over 15 Days

Total nasal symptom score (TNSS) is a composite of 4 symptoms, each is scored on a scale of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The total can range from 0 to 12. (NCT00733005)
Timeframe: 15 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-2.61
Placebo Nasal Spray-2.06

[back to top]

The Change From Baseline in Average AM/PM PRIOR Nasal Congestion Score Over 15 Days.

Nasal congestion was scored on a scale of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. PRIOR (the subject's status over the previous 12 hours [reflective]) (NCT00733005)
Timeframe: 15 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-0.68
Placebo Nasal Spray-0.57

[back to top]

Plasma Formoterol Concentrations (Pmol/L) Following a Single Dose of Formoterol Fumarate Alone and in Combination With Mometasone Furoate Via the pMDI and Formoterol Fumarate Via the Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI)

Unchanged racemic formoterol in plasma was assayed by LC-MS/MS. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for plasma was 1.45 pmol/L. No non-compartmental PK analysis was performed. (NCT00746330)
Timeframe: 5, 30 Minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 Hours Post-dose

,,
Interventionpmol/L (Mean)
Pre-Dose (N count MFF=15,F12M=17,F12D=16)5-10 minutes (N=16, 17, 17)30 minutes - 2 hours (N=16,17,17)2 hours - 4 hours (N= 16, 17, 17)4 hours - 8 hours (N= 16, 17, 17)8 hours - 12 hours (N= 16, 16, 17)
F12D018.5623.117.411.36.83
F12M016.324.717.711.06.66
MFF10013.127.522.412.37.74

[back to top]

The Standardized Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Using Area Under the Curve (AUC) From 0 to 12 Hours (0-12h) Post-dose by Treatment

For FEV1 AUC(0-12h) the trapezoidal rule was applied using planned time measurements to calculate the AUC up to and including the last measurement recorded before intake of rescue medication. The AUC was standardized by dividing by the length of time for which measurements of FEV1 were included in the calculation of the AUC thus adjusting for subjects who were unable to complete the measurements during the 12-hour observation period and without inhaling rescue medication. The unit of the AUC was in L, being a weighted average of the acceptable FEV1 measurements recorded over 12 hours post dose (NCT00746330)
Timeframe: From 0 to 12 Hours (0-12h) post-dose, after each treatment administered (approximately 1 treatment a week for 4 weeks of treatment).

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
MFF101.77
F12M1.77
F12D1.80
Placebo1.71

[back to top]

Serial FEV1 Measurement (i.e. at 5, 30 Minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 Hours Post-dose) Following Inhalation of a Single Dose of Study Medication to Evaluate the Onset and Duration of the Bronchodilatory Effect

All efficacy evaluations were based on spirometry assessments of lung function. FEV1 is the maximum amount of air expired in one second. At Visits 2, 3, 4 and 5, spirometry assessments were performed in the clinic at predose and again at 5 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 hours post-dose within ± 5 minutes of the scheduled time for the time points up to and including 60 minutes post-dose and then within ± 10 minutes for all subsequent time points. Spirometry equipment and performance of spirometric testing were in accordance with the (ATS / ERS) standards. (NCT00746330)
Timeframe: 5, 30 Minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 Hours Post-dose

,,,
Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
5 minutes30 minutes1 hour (N=32, 31, 29, 31)2 hours4 hours8 hours12 hours
F12D1.771.821.861.851.841.791.76
F12M1.771.801.801.791.791.751.71
MFF101.741.791.811.811.811.761.72
Placebo1.681.691.721.731.721.701.66

[back to top]

Serial Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Measurement (i.e. at 5, 30 Minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 Hours Post-dose) Following Inhalation of a Single Dose of Study Medication to Evaluate the Onset and Duration of the Bronchodilatory Effect

All efficacy evaluations were based on spirometry assessments of lung function. FVC is the volume (liters) of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration. At Visits 2, 3, 4 and 5, spirometry assessments were performed in the clinic at predose and again at 5 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 hours post-dose within ± 5 minutes of the scheduled time for the time points up to and including 60 minutes post-dose and then within ± 10 minutes for all subsequent time points. Spirometry equipment and performance of spirometric testing were in accordance with the ATS / ERS standards. (NCT00746330)
Timeframe: 5, 30 Minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 Hours Post-dose

,,,
Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
5 minutes30 minutes1 hour (N=32, 31, 29, 31)2 hours4 hours8 hours12 hours
F12D2.092.112.152.142.122.102.09
F12M2.092.112.092.082.082.092.05
MFF102.092.122.142.112.122.092.07
Placebo2.082.082.102.112.112.092.06

[back to top]

Serial Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEF) Measurement (i.e. at 5, 30 Minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 Hours Post-dose) Following Inhalation of a Single Dose of Study Medication to Evaluate the Onset and Duration of the Bronchodilatory Effect

All efficacy evaluations were based on spirometry assessments of lung function. PEF is the greatest airflow rate achieved during forced exhalation with lungs fully inflated. At Visits 2, 3, 4 and 5, spirometry assessments were performed in the clinic at predose and again at 5 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 hours post-dose within ± 5 minutes of the scheduled time for the time points up to and including 60 minutes post-dose and then within ± 10 minutes for all subsequent time points. Spirometry equipment and performance of spirometric testing were in accordance with the ATS/ERS standards (NCT00746330)
Timeframe: 5, 30 Minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 Hours Post-dose

,,,
Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
5 minutes30 minutes1 hour (N=32, 31, 29, 31)2 hours4 hours8 hours12 hours
F12D250.05257.81262.95267.91265.20262.61259.71
F12M248.17253.37257.08259.28258.92255.27250.71
MFF10246.65255.69261.18261.45264.68257.96255.48
Placebo237.85243.59248.24248.88249.07248.47244.13

[back to top]

Urinary Excretion of Formoterol Following a Single Dose of Formoterol Fumarate Alone and in Combination With Mometasone Furoate Via the pMDI and Formoterol Fumarate Via the Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI)

Unchanged racemic formoterol in urine was assayed by LC-MS/MS. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for urine was 0.0174 nmol/L expressed as free base. The amounts of unchanged formoterol excreted in urine from 0 to 3 hours (Ae0-3) and from 0 to 12 hours post-dose (Ae0-12) were calculated from the formoterol concentrations in urine and the urine volumes using non-compartmental methods. (NCT00746330)
Timeframe: 0 to 3 hrs and 0-12 hrs

,,
Interventionnmol (Least Squares Mean)
Ae (0-3) nmol (N=15,17,17)Ae (0-12) nmol (N=16,17,17)
F12D0.421.33
F12M0.521.50
MFF100.311.14

[back to top]

Change in 4 Nasal Symptom Score (Sneezing Attack, Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, and Nasal Itching) After 2 Weeks

The nasal symptoms (sneezing attacks, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion and itching) were rated in 4 grades (+++: 3 points, ++: 2 points, +: 1 point, -: 0 point) based on the evaluation criteria for nasal symptoms. Total possible best score is 0 points, total possible worst score is 12 points. (NCT00783224)
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 weeks of treatment

,,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineTwo Weeks
Fluticasone Propionate (FP)8.293.69
Fluticasone Propionate Placebo (PLAFP)8.411.74
Mometasone Furoate (MF)8.273.90
Mometasone Furoate Placebo (PLAMF)7.841.63

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Final Visit

"The Asthma Control Questionnaire score ranges from 0 (good control of asthma) to 6 (poor control of asthma). A negative change in score indicates improvement in asthma control.~Repeated measures of analysis of covariance model: change from baseline in ACQ score = treatment + visit + treatment*visit interaction + baseline ACQ score + region + asthma related hospitalization in the last 12 months + asthma worsening in the last 12 months + African American patient." (NCT00941798)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of treatment (varying durations, up to 21 months)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 Twisthaler® 500/400-0.55
Mometasone Twisthaler®-0.32

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiration Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Final Visit

Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FEV1 was measured 15 minutes before dosing; measurements within 6 hours of rescue medication use were set to missing. Repeated measures of analysis of covariance model: change from baseline to trough FEV1 = treatment + visit + treatment*visit interaction + baseline FEV1 + region + asthma related hospitalization in the last 12 months + asthma worsening in the last 12 months + African American patient. (NCT00941798)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of treatment (varying durations, up to 21 months)

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 Twisthaler® 500/4000.06
Mometasone Twisthaler®-0.07

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of the First Serious Asthma Exacerbation Resulting in Hospitalization, Intubation or Death.

The number of patients with at least one serious asthma exacerbation over the course of the study. A serious asthma exacerbation was one that resulted in hospitalization, intubation or death. (NCT00941798)
Timeframe: up to 21 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
QMF149 Twisthaler® 500/4002
Mometasone Twisthaler®6

[back to top]

Number of Patients With at Least One Asthma Worsening Post-baseline

The criterion for asthma worsening were: decrease in peak expiratory flow (PEF) >= 20% from mean baseline on >= 3 consecutive days, nighttime symptom score >= 2 on >= 2 consecutive nights, decrease in forced expiration volume in 1 second (FEV1) >=20% from baseline at evening visits, daytime symptom score of 3 or 4 on >= 2 consecutive days, requiring an urgent unscheduled visit for medical care, 24 hour rescue medication use >= 8 puffs on >= 2 consecutive days, and any other clinically important symptoms (pre-specified MedDRA preferred terms). (NCT00941798)
Timeframe: Up to 21 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
QMF149 Twisthaler® 500/400533
Mometasone Twisthaler®637

[back to top]

Patients With Asthma Exacerbations That Required Treatment With Systemic Corticosteroids

Number of patients requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids (oral or parenteral) over the course of the study (up to 21 months). (NCT00941798)
Timeframe: Up to 21 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
QMF149 Twisthaler® 500/400124
Mometasone Twisthaler®171

[back to top]

Time to First Serious Asthma Exacerbation

Defined as the number of days from start of treatment up to the first date when an asthma exacerbation becomes serious. A serious asthma exacerbation was one that resulted in hospitalization, intubation or death. (NCT00941798)
Timeframe: Up to 21 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
QMF149 Twisthaler® 500/40013.3
Mometasone Twisthaler®13.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average Asthma Symptom Score Total, Daytime and Nighttime

"Total asthma symptom score = morning symptoms (0, 1) + daytime score (0-4) + nighttime score (0-4). The range is from 0 to 9. A lower number indicates improvement. Baseline = the last 14 days prior to start of treatment.~Analysis of covariance model: Change from baseline = treatment + baseline value + region + history of asthma related hospitalization in past 12 months + history of asthma worsening in past 12 months + African American patient." (NCT00941798)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of treatment (varying durations, up to 21 months)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Total (n = 708, 733)Daytime (n = 731, 749)Nighttime (n = 730, 746)
Mometasone Twisthaler®-0.94-0.39-0.36
QMF149 Twisthaler® 500/400-1.22-0.50-0.46

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiration Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Final Visit

Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Change from baseline at final visit. FEV1 data taken within 6 hours of rescue medication was excluded from the analysis. Repeated measures of analysis of covariance model: change from baseline to final visit FEV1 = treatment + visit + treatment*visit interaction + baseline FEV1 + region + asthma related hospitalization in the last 12 months + asthma worsening in the last 12 months + African American patient. (NCT00941798)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of treatment (varying durations, up to 21 months). At the following timepoints: 5 minutes post-dose, 30 minutes post-dose, 1 hour post-dose and 2 hours post-dose

,
Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
5 minutes post-dose (n = 578, 607)30 minutes post-dose (n = 576, 605)1 hour post-dose (n = 575, 602)2 hours post-dose (n = 568, 601)
Mometasone Twisthaler®-0.04-0.05-0.06-0.05
QMF149 Twisthaler® 500/4000.090.120.130.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Final Visit

Spirometry was conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Change from baseline at final visit. FVC data taken within 6 hours of rescue medication was excluded from the analysis. Repeated measures of analysis of covariance model: change from baseline to final visit FVC = treatment + visit + treatment*visit interaction + baseline FVC + region + asthma related hospitalization in the last 12 months + asthma worsening in the last 12 months + African American patient. (NCT00941798)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of treatment (varying durations, up to 21 months). At the following timepoints: 5 minutes post-dose, 30 minutes post-dose, 1 hour post-dose and 2 hours post-dose

,
Interventionliter (Least Squares Mean)
5 minutes post-dose (n = 578, 607)30 minutes post-dose (n = 576, 605)1 hour post-dose (n = 575, 602)2 hours post-dose (n = 568, 601)
Mometasone Twisthaler®-0.11-0.13-0.13-0.13
QMF149 Twisthaler® 500/400-0.03-0.03-0.01-0.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Days With no Asthma Symptoms During the Morning, Daytime and Nighttime

Baseline = the last 14 days prior to start of treatment. Analysis of covariance model: Change from baseline = treatment + baseline value + region + history of asthma related hospitalization in past 12 months + history of asthma worsening in past 12 months + African American patient. (NCT00941798)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of treatment (varying durations, up to 21 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
Morning (n = 730, 746)Daytime (n = 731, 749)Nighttime (n = 730, 746)
Mometasone Twisthaler®18.419.517.3
QMF149 Twisthaler® 500/40022.327.123.6

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) and Trough Evening PEF Averaged Over the Entire Post-baseline Period

"PEF was performed every morning and evening prior to study medication use except evenings on the day of clinic visits.~Baseline is average over the last 14 days prior to start of treatment. Analysis of covariance model: change from baseline in PEF = treatment + baseline PEF + region + history of asthma related hospitalization in the past 12 months + history of asthma worsening in the past 12 months + African American patient." (NCT00941798)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of treatment (varying durations, up to 21 months)

,
Interventionliters per second (Least Squares Mean)
Morning PEF (n = 730, 746)Evening PEF (n = 731, 748)
Mometasone Twisthaler®0.00-0.15
QMF149 Twisthaler® 500/4000.430.27

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Days With no Rescue Medication Use During 24 Hours, Daytime and Nighttime

24 hours consists of both 12 hour daytime and 12 hour nighttime. Baseline = the last 14 days prior to start of treatment. Analysis of covariance model: Change from baseline = treatment + baseline value + region + history of asthma related hospitalization in past 12 months + history of asthma worsening in past 12 months + African American patient. (NCT00941798)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of treatment (varying durations, up to 21 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
24 hours (n = 669, 696)Daytime (n = 692, 711)Nighttime (n = 691, 708)
Mometasone Twisthaler®17.913.814.5
QMF149 Twisthaler® 500/40029.123.624.6

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)

"Patients were required to record a 12 hour reflective score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTNSS patients were asked to look back or reflect on their severity of nasal symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms.~Mean baseline rTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period.~Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline rTNSS - mean post-randomization rTNSS. A positive change from baseline in rTNSS is considered a favorable outcome." (NCT01038427)
Timeframe: Baseline, 14 days

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Test1.981
Reference1.817

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)

"Patients were required to record an instantaneous score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the iTNSS patients were asked to evaluate how I feel now regarding their severity of nasal symptoms. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean iTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms.~Mean baseline iTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period.~Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline iTNSS - mean post-randomization iTNSS. A positive change from baseline in iTNSS is considered a favorable outcome." (NCT01038427)
Timeframe: Baseline, 14 days

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Test1.900
Reference1.656

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)

"Patients were required to record an instantaneous score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the iTNSS patients were asked to evaluate how I feel now regarding their severity of nasal symptoms. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean iTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms.~Mean baseline iTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period.~Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline iTNSS - mean post-randomization iTNSS. A positive change from baseline in iTNSS is considered a favorable outcome." (NCT01038427)
Timeframe: Baseline, 14 days

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Test1.932
Reference1.630
Placebo0.905

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)

"Patients were required to record a 12 hour reflective score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTNSS patients were asked to look back or reflect on their severity of nasal symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms.~Mean baseline rTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period.~Mean change from baseline was calculated as mean baseline rTNSS - mean post-randomization rTNSS. A positive change from baseline in rTNSS is considered a favorable outcome." (NCT01038427)
Timeframe: Baseline, 14 days

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Test2.008
Reference1.794
Placebo1.034

[back to top]

Allergen-induced Concentrations of Sputum LTC4

Concentrations of LTC4 in sputum at 2 hours post-allergen challenge (NCT01061333)
Timeframe: 2 hours post allergen challenge

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Placebo13.63
Nedocromil14.02
Montelukast13.76
Mometasone12.14

[back to top]

Allergen-induced Concentrations of Sputum LTD4

Concentrations of LTD4 in sputum at 2 hours post-allergen challenge (NCT01061333)
Timeframe: 2 hours post allergen challenge

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Placebo17.48
Nedocromil18.04
Montelukast18.52
Mometasone17.37

[back to top]

Allergen-induced Concentrations of Sputum LTE4

Concentrations of LTE4 in sputum at 2 hours post-allergen challenge (NCT01061333)
Timeframe: 2 hours post allergen challenge

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Placebo115.5
Nedocromil149.8
Montelukast181.3
Mometasone140.3

[back to top]

Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

Maximal percent drop in FEV1 at 20 minutes post allergen challenge (NCT01061333)
Timeframe: Pre-allergen challenge and 20 minutes after allergen challenge

InterventionPercentage drop in FEV1 (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-24.66
Nedocromil-8.44
Montelukast-9.15
Mometasone-16.17

[back to top]

Change in Plasma 9P at 20 Minutes

Fold change over baseline of plasma 9P at 20 minutes post-allergen challenge (NCT01061333)
Timeframe: Pre-allergen challenge and 20 minutes post allergen challenge

InterventionFold change over baseline (Geometric Mean)
Placebo1.22
Nedocromil0.72
Montelukast0.72
Mometasone1.06

[back to top]

Change in Plasma 9α-11β-PGF2 (9P) at 5 Minutes

Fold change over baseline of plasma 9P at 5 minutes post-allergen challenge (NCT01061333)
Timeframe: Pre-allergen challenge and 5 minutes post allergen challenge

InterventionFold change over baseline (Geometric Mean)
Placebo0.77
Nedocromil0.97
Montelukast1.08
Mometasone1.00

[back to top]

Allergen-induced Changes in Urinary 9P

Fold change over baseline in Urinary 9P at 2 hours post allergen challenge (NCT01061333)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 hours post allergen challenge

InterventionFold change over baseline (Geometric Mean)
Placebo1.54
Nedocromil1.39
Montelukast1.45
Mometasone1.40

[back to top]

Allergen-induced Changes in Urinary Leukotriene (LT) E4

Fold change over baseline in urinary LTE4 at 2 hours post-allergen challenge (NCT01061333)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 hours post allergen challenge

InterventionFold change over baseline (Geometric Mean)
Placebo1.77
Nedocromil1.19
Montelukast1.40
Mometasone1.62

[back to top]

Degree of Posterior Choana Obstruction at Baseline and Week 12

The degree of obstruction of the posterior choana was assessed by endoscopy. Endoscopy grading consisted of Grade I (minimum), Grade II and Grade III (maximum). Grade I was defined as <50% obstruction, Grade II was defined as 50-75% obstruction, and Grade III was defined as >75% obstruction. (NCT01098071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercent obstruction (Mean)
Baseline scoreScore at Week 12
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray8561

[back to top]

Number of Participants Referred to Surgery (Adenoidectomy) Within 12 Weeks of Start of Therapy

(NCT01098071)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray2

[back to top]

Severity of Eye Symptoms at Baseline and Week 12

Eye symptoms are a symptom of allergic rhinitis. Eye symptoms were assessed using a 3-point scale (0 = no symptoms [best score] and 3 = symptom interferes with daily life activity [worst score]). (NCT01098071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline scoreScore at Week 12
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray0.680.16

[back to top]

Severity of Sneezing at Baseline and Week 12

Sneezing is a symptom of allergic rhinitis. Sneezing was assessed using a 3-point scale (0 = no symptoms [best score] and 3 = symptom interferes with daily life activity [worst score]). (NCT01098071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline scoreScore at Week 12
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray0.890.37

[back to top]

Severity of Rhinorrhea at Baseline and Week 12

Rhinorrhea is a symptom of allergic rhinitis. Rhinorrhea was assessed using a 3-point scale (0 = no symptoms [best score] and 3 = symptom interferes with daily life activity [worst score]). (NCT01098071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline scoreScore at Week 12
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray0.950.37

[back to top]

Severity of Nasal Obstruction Symptoms at Baseline and Week 12 as Measured by the Total Clinical Score

Clinical score (based on a 5 point grading system) was assessed for each of 5 nasal obstruction symptoms (oral/mouth breathing, snoring, restless sleep, frequent waking-ups during the night, and obstructive breathing during sleep). Each nasal obstruction symptom was estimated by the parent/guardian of the participant and scored on a scale of 0 (best) to 1 (worst). Total clinical score is a score on a scale (0 = no symptoms [best score] and 5 = worst symptoms [worst score]). (NCT01098071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline scoreScore at Week 12
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray3.891.26

[back to top]

Severity of Nasal Itching at Baseline and Week 12

Nasal itching is a symptom of allergic rhinitis. Nasal itching was assessed using a 3-point scale (0 = no symptoms [best score] and 3 = symptom interferes with daily life activity [worst score]). (NCT01098071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline scoreScore at Week 12
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray0.740.37

[back to top]

Severity of Nasal Congestion at Baseline and Week 12

Nasal congestion is a symptom of allergic rhinitis. Nasal congestion was assessed using a 3-point scale (0 = no symptoms [best score] and 3 = symptom interferes with daily life activity [worst score]). (NCT01098071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline scoreScore at Week 12
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray0.790.32

[back to top]

Childhood Asthma Control Test

Childhood Asthma Control Test (score range: 0-27); higher score indicates better asthma control (NCT01118312)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Nasal Steroid4.15
Placebo4.53

[back to top]

Asthma Control Test (ACT)

Asthma Control Test for adults (score range: 5-25); higher score indicates better asthma control (NCT01118312)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Nasal Steroid2.95
Placebo2.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score at 1 Week

Total nasal symptom score was a composite of 4 symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and nasal itching), each symptom was scored on a scale of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The total score ranged from 0 to 12. The higher the score was, the more severe the symptoms were. (NCT01135134)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 week

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
MFNS-2.4686
Placebo-1.1651

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score at 2 Weeks

Total nasal symptom score was a composite of 4 symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and nasal itching), each symptom was scored on a scale of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The total score ranged from 0 to 12. The higher the score was, the more severe the symptoms were. (NCT01135134)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks (or discontinuation)

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
MFNS-3.9850
Placebo-1.9081

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score

Total nasal symptom score was a composite of 4 symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and nasal itching). Each symptom was scored on a scale of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe for a total score ranging from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms. (NCT01165424)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 (or discontinuation)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change at Week 2Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12Change at Week 24
MFNS-3.1-3.9-4.4-4.5-4.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Adverse Drug Reactions

(NCT01165424)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number with Adverse EventsNumber with Adverse Drug Reactions
MFNS7618

[back to top]

Albuterol Induced Percent Change in Qaw

Qaw will be measured before and 15 min after albuterol inhalation (NCT01210170)
Timeframe: change in Qaw 15 minutes after albuterol inhalation

Interventionpercent change in Qaw (Mean)
400 mcg Mometasone 30 Minutes Before Albuterol18
Mometasone Placebo 30 Minutes Before Albuterol0
400 mcg Mometasone and Albuterol Simultaneously30
Mometasone Placebo and Albuterol Simultaneously-2
400 mcg Mometasone 60 Minutes Before AlbuterolNA
Mometasone Placebo 60 Minutes Before AlbuterolNA
200 mcg Mometasone and Albuterol SimultaneouslyNA
200 mcg Mometasone 60 Minutes Before AlbuterolNA
200 mcg Mometasone 30 Minutes Before AlbuterolNA

[back to top]

Albuterol-induced Change in FEV1

FEV1 will be measured before and after inhalation of 180 mcg albuterol. (NCT01210170)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after albuterol inhalation

Interventionliters (Mean)
All Participants Received 400 mcg Mometasone-30 Min0.27
All Participants Received Placebo 30 Minutes Before Albuterol0.18
All Participants Received 400 mcg Mometasone Simultaneous0.32
All Participants Received Placebo Simultaneously With Albutero0.20
All Participants Received 200 mcg Mometasone-30 Min0.23
All Participants Received 400 mcg -60 MinNA
All Participants Received Placebo -60 MinNA
All Participants Received 200 mcg Mometasone SimultaneousNA
All Participants Received 200 mcg -60 MinNA

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From 0-12 Hours (AUC[0-12h]) of the Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After a Single Dose of MF/F MDI With Spacer Compared to Placebo MDI Combined With or Without Spacer

The AUC was standardized to liters by dividing the length of time for which measurements of FEV1 were included in the calculation of the AUC. Baseline was defined as the average of 2 pre-dose FEV1 measurements (taken 30 minutes before and immediately before dosing), which was subtracted from each of the serial FEV1 measurements over the 12-hour period. The AUC was calculated based on these changes from the baseline evaluations using the trapezoidal rule. (NCT01258803)
Timeframe: Up to 12 hours postdose

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
MF/F MDI With Spacer0.115
Placebo MDI With or Without Spacer-0.009

[back to top]

AUC (0-12h) of the Change From Baseline in FEV1 After a Single Dose of F DPI Compared to Placebo MDI Combined With or Without Spacer

The AUC was standardized to liters by dividing the length of time for which measurements of FEV1 were included in the calculation of the AUC. Baseline was defined as the average of 2 pre-dose FEV1 measurements (taken 30 minutes before and immediately before dosing), which was subtracted from each of the serial FEV1 measurements over the 12-hour period. The AUC was calculated based on these changes from the baseline evaluations using the trapezoidal rule. (NCT01258803)
Timeframe: Up to 12 hours postdose

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
F DPI0.097
Placebo MDI With or Without Spacer-0.009

[back to top]

AUC (0-12h) of the Change From Baseline in FEV1 After a Single Dose of MF/F With Spacer Compared to F DPI

The AUC was standardized to liters by dividing the length of time for which measurements of FEV1 were included in the calculation of the AUC. Baseline was defined as the average of 2 pre-dose FEV1 measurements (taken 30 minutes before and immediately before dosing), which was subtracted from each of the serial FEV1 measurements over the 12-hour period. The AUC was calculated based on these changes from the baseline evaluations using the trapezoidal rule. (NCT01258803)
Timeframe: Up to 12 hours postdose

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
MF/F MDI With Spacer0.115
F DPI0.097

[back to top]

AUC (0-12h) of the Change From Baseline in FEV1 After a Single Dose of MF/F Without Spacer Compared to F DPI

The AUC was standardized to liters by dividing the length of time for which measurements of FEV1 were included in the calculation of the AUC. Baseline was defined as the average of 2 pre-dose FEV1 measurements (taken 30 minutes before and immediately before dosing), which was subtracted from each of the serial FEV1 measurements over the 12-hour period. The AUC was calculated based on these changes from the baseline evaluations using the trapezoidal rule. (NCT01258803)
Timeframe: Up to 12 hours postdose

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
MF/F MDI Without Spacer0.093
F DPI0.097

[back to top]

AUC(0-12h) of the Change From Baseline in FEV1 After a Single Dose MF/F MDI Without Spacer Compared to Placebo MDI Combined With or Without Spacer

The AUC was standardized to liters by dividing the length of time for which measurements of FEV1 were included in the calculation of the AUC. Baseline was defined as the average of 2 pre-dose FEV1 measurements (taken 30 minutes before and immediately before dosing), which was subtracted from each of the serial FEV1 measurements over the 12-hour period. The AUC was calculated based on these changes from the baseline evaluations using the trapezoidal rule. (NCT01258803)
Timeframe: Up to 12 hours postdose

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
MF/F MDI Without Spacer0.093
Placebo MDI With or Without Spacer-0.009

[back to top]

AUC(0-12h) of the Change From Baseline in FEV1 After a Single Dose of MF/F MDI With Spacer Compared to MF/F MDI Without Spacer

The AUC was standardized to liters by dividing the length of time for which measurements of FEV1 were included in the calculation of the AUC. Baseline was defined as the average of 2 pre-dose FEV1 measurements (taken 30 minutes before and immediately before dosing), which was subtracted from each of the serial FEV1 measurements over the 12-hour period. The AUC was calculated based on these changes from the baseline evaluations using the trapezoidal rule. (NCT01258803)
Timeframe: Up to 12 hours postdose

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
MF/F MDI With Spacer0.115
MF/F MDI Without Spacer0.093

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FEV1 After a Single Dose of MF/F MDI With Spacer, MF/F MDI Without Spacer, F DPI or Placebo MDI Combined With or Without Spacer at 5 and 30 Minutes, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 Hours Postdose

Baseline was defined as the average of 2 predose measurements (taken 30 minutes and immediately before dosing). (NCT01258803)
Timeframe: Baseline and 5 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 hours postdose

,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (n=79, 79, 79, 79)5 minutes postdose (n=79, 79, 79, 79)30 minutes postdose (n=79, 79, 79, 79)1 hour postdose (n=79, 79, 79, 79)2 hours postdose (n=79, 79, 79, 79)4 hours postdose (n=79, 79, 79, 79)8 hours postdose (n=79, 79, 79, 79)12 hours postdose (n=78, 79, 78, 79)
F DPI1.5700.1050.1170.1360.1350.1180.0870.059
MF/F MDI With Spacer1.5540.1110.1310.1590.1360.1360.1080.092
MF/F MDI Without Spacer1.5630.0680.0990.1310.1260.1150.0930.046
Placebo MDI With or Without Spacer1.547-0.0010.0060.0070.0190.005-0.012-0.033

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) After a Single Dose of MF/F MDI With Spacer, MF/F MDI Without Spacer, F DPI or Placebo MDI Combined With or Without Spacer at 5 and 30 Minutes, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 Hours Postdose

Baseline was defined as the average of 2 predose FVC measurements (taken 30 minutes and immediately before dosing). (NCT01258803)
Timeframe: Baseline and 5 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 hours postdose

,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (n=79, 79, 79, 79)5 minutes postdose (n=79, 79, 79, 79)30 minutes postdose (n=79, 79, 79, 79)1 hour postdose (n=79, 79, 79, 79)2 hours postdose (n=79, 79, 79, 79)4 hours postdose (n=79, 79, 79, 79)8 hours postdose (n=79, 79, 79, 79)12 hours postdose (n=78, 79, 78, 79)
F DPI1.9280.0320.0170.0220.0470.008-0.013-0.014
MF/F MDI With Spacer1.9140.0280.0370.0480.0230.031-0.001-0.001
MF/F MDI Without Spacer1.9310.0050.0200.0270.0260.0180.007-0.022
Placebo MDI With or Without Spacer1.9130.0180.009-0.0030.015-0.006-0.006-0.012

[back to top]

Discriminant Validity of Treatment Satisfaction Subscales Statistical Analyses Based on Baseline Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) Categories (Low, Medium, High)

Discriminant validity tests whether the subscales differentiate among groups of respondents that differ on a pre-specified criterion, baseline rTNSS. Patients were assigned to baseline rTNSS categories of Low Symptoms(3.00 - 7.17; n = 62), Medium Symptoms (7.25 - 9.25; n = 61), or High Symptoms (9.33 - 12.00; n = 62). Reflective TNSS group served as the independent variable and the nine treatment satisfaction subscales were evaluated as dependent variables by analysis of variance models. Contrasts were tested between the Low and Medium Symptoms and the High and Low Symptom categories. Reflective TNSS group served as the independent variable and the nine treatment satisfaction subscales were evaluated as dependent variables by analysis of variance models. All of the treatment satisfaction subscales and satisfaction scales were scored from 0 (low satisfaction) to 100 (high satisfaction). (NCT01287364)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Pre-treatment) through Day 7 Treatment Period 1

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
InterferenceRegimen AdaptationRole LimitationRegimen DifficultySensory ImpactHassleBurdenRegimen ManagementPerceived ReliefOverall Satisfaction
High Symptoms59.01853.45573.26971.67653.74240.72660.53472.19250.05459.407
Low Symptoms78.72660.76487.14185.94067.93463.36177.81880.94956.06673.189
Medium Symptoms70.93159.49183.52878.89061.45249.83976.10981.77155.45768.607

[back to top]

Principal Components Analysis (Treatment Process, Treatment Outcomes) Factor Loadings for Treatment Preference Scales

"Principal components analysis was conducted with varimax rotation that revealed two factors. These two factors are the principal components of the preference scale: Treatment Process and Treatment Outcomes. Loadings represent the degree each of the variables correlates with each of the factors. The loadings range from -1 to 1. An inspection of the factor loadings, reveals the extent to which each of the variables contributes to the meaning of each of the factors. High loading number provide meaning and interpretation of factors." (NCT01287364)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Pre-treatment) through Day 29

,
Interventionfactor loadings (Number)
for conveniencefor ease of usefor use in publicfor tastefewer problems with medicaton running out nosefor number of sprays per dosefor flexibility in daily activitiesfor smellfewer problems w/ medication dripping down throatfor longer relieffor symptom relieffor faster reliefif both were the same pricefor better feeling about your appearancefor fewer problems with irritation to your nosefor how is makes your nose feel
Treatment Outcomes0.4330.4500.2700.1420.3240.3310.5600.3600.2340.8760.8750.8020.7730.6780.5870.571
Treatment Process0.7660.7640.7620.7560.7220.7130.7120.7060.6660.2300.2430.2830.4330.5390.5090.501

[back to top]

Responsiveness Statistical Analysis of Treatment Satisfaction Subscales for Treatment Period 2 Versus Change in rTNSS From Baseline Categories (Low Change, Medium Change, or High Change)

"Analysis was conducted with one-sample t-tests on the treatment satisfaction subscale change scores for Treatment Period 2 against the test criterion of no change (ie, change score = 0)TNSS is the sum of individual symptoms of runny nose, sneezing, itchy nose, and nasal congestions. Subjects assess each individual symptom on a scale of 0-3: 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. TNSS values range from 0-12 (0 representing an absence of symptoms and higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms). Reflective TNSS measures these symptoms over the previous 12-hour time interval. All of the treatment satisfaction subscales and satisfaction scales were scored from 0 (low satisfaction) to 100 (high satisfaction)." (NCT01287364)
Timeframe: Day 1 (pre-treatment) through Day 7 Treatment Period 2

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
InterferenceRegimen AdaptationRole LimitationRegimen DifficultySensory ImpactHassleBurdenRegimen ManagementPerceived ReliefOverall Satisfaction
High Change6.6124.2424.688.3093.20010.2734.6021.5248.4244.875
Low Change.8838-8.4621.075-7.620-3.407-0.6481.8520.2521-6.512-2.510
Medium Change7.914-3.7616.079-3.751-0.5008.0368.1471.265-2.3812.337

[back to top]

Sensitivity Analyses of Treatment Satisfaction Subscales: Standard Effect Sizes (SES)

"Within-and between-responder group standardized effect sizes (SES) were calculated. The generally accepted guidelines for clinically important standard effect sizes are small(0.2), medium (0.5), and large (0.8).~Between group SES indicates the magnitude of treatment differences. In this case, the groups were responders according to the baseline rTNSS scores. All of the treatment satisfaction subscales and satisfaction scales were scored from 0 (low satisfaction) to 100 (high satisfaction)." (NCT01287364)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Pre-treatment) through Day 29

,,
Interventionstandard effect sizes (Number)
InterferenceRegimen AdaptationRole LimitationRegimen DifficultySensory ImpactHassleBurdenRegimen ManagementPerceived Relief
High Minus Low Response Group0.4740.5530.1980.1570.3260.5970.0640.0760.591
High Response Group0.8930.5340.9200.0980.8430.9260.7610.7280.439
Low Response Group0.5510.0570.722-0.0570.7200.4660.8980.656-0.114

[back to top]

Treatment Satisfaction Subscales (Interference, Regimen Adaptation, Role Limitations, Sensory Impact, Regimen Difficulties, Burden, Hassle, Regimen Management, and Perceived Relief)Reliability Statistics

Reliability for the nine treatment satisfaction subscales was established through internal consistency statistical analyses [Cronbach's alpha (raw and standardized) coefficients were calculated]. The correlation coefficients for these analyses ranged from 0.0 to 1.0, with higher coefficients indicating greater reliability. A coefficient of ≥ 0.7 was the standard for evidence of reliability. (NCT01287364)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Pre-treatment) through Day 7 Treatment Period 2

,
Interventionratio of variance (Number)
InterferenceRegimen AdaptationRole LimitationsSensory ImpactRegimen DifficultiesHassleBurdenRegimen ManagementPerceived Relief
Average Cronbach's Alpha (Raw) Coefficients0.9710.9320.9390.8890.7220.9180.9370.7500.864
Average Cronbach's Alpha (Standardized) Coefficients0.9720.9320.9440.8950.7310.9280.9380.8040.871

[back to top]

Responsiveness Statistical Analysis of Treatment Satisfaction Subscales for Treatment Period 1 Versus Change in rTNSS From Baseline Categories (Low Change, Medium Change, or High Change)

"Analysis was conducted with one-sample t-tests on the treatment satisfaction subscale change scores for Treatment Period 1 against the test criterion of no change (ie, change score = 0)TNSS is the sum of individual symptoms of runny nose, sneezing, itchy nose, and nasal congestions. Subjects assess each individual symptom on a scale of 0-3: 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. TNSS values range from 0-12 (0 representing an absence of symptoms and higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms). Reflective TNSS measures these symptoms over the previous 12-hour time interval. All of the treatment satisfaction subscales and satisfaction scales were scored from 0 (low satisfaction) to 100 (high satisfaction)." (NCT01287364)
Timeframe: Day 1 (pre-treatment) through Day 7 Treatment Period 1

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
InterferenceRegimen AdaptationRole LimitationRegimen DifficultySensory ImpactHassleBurdenRegimen ManagementPerceived ReliefOverall Satisfaction
High Change20.38013.33312.4402.08319.47526.47516.7019.02712.70514.735
Low Change10.4921.1219.764-1.08312.66711.25015.4698.042-2.9177.201
Medium Change15.83612.12110.5123.76013.22617.74216.3319.3488.28011.906

[back to top]

Initial Deposition of Radioactivity Within the Nasal Cavity as a Percent of Delivered Dose

The scintigraphic measure of radioactivity initially deposited (approximately 2 minutes post-dose) within the nasal cavity, expressed as a percent of the delivered dose (i.e., the total amount of radioactivity delivered), following nasal inhalation of a ciclesonide radiolabeled solution via a novel nasal MDI and a mometasone radiolabeled suspension via an aqueous nasal spray. (NCT01371786)
Timeframe: Day 1 at 2 minutes post dose

Interventionpercentage of radiolabeled (Mean)
Ciclesonide Nasal Aerosol99.48
Mometasone86.28

[back to top]

Initial Deposition of Radioactivity on Nasal Wipes as a Percent of Delivered Dose

The scintigraphic measure of radioactivity initially deposited (approximately 2 minutes post-dose) on nasal wipes, expressed as a percent of the delivered dose (i.e., the total amount of radioactivity delivered), following nasal inhalation of a ciclesonide radiolabeled solution via a novel nasal MDI and a mometasone radiolabeled suspension via an aqueous nasal spray. (NCT01371786)
Timeframe: Day 1 at 2 minutes post-dose

Interventionpercentage of radiolabeled (Mean)
Ciclesonide Nasal Aerosol0.49
Mometasone12.15

[back to top]

Deposition of Radioactivity Within the Nasal Cavity Over 10 Minutes as a Percent of Delivered Dose

The scintigraphic measure of radioactivity deposited within the nasal cavity, expressed as a percent of the delivered dose (i.e., the total amount of radioactivity delivered), over 10 minutes (at approximately 2 minute intervals post-dose) following nasal inhalation of a ciclesonide radiolabeled solution via a novel nasal MDI and a mometasone radiolabeled suspension via an aqueous nasal spray. (NCT01371786)
Timeframe: Average of 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 minutes post dose

Interventionpercentage of of radiolabled (Mean)
Ciclesonide Nasal Aerosol89.61
Mometasone69.15

[back to top]

Deposition of Radioactivity Within on Nasal Wipes Over 10 Minutes as a Percent of Delivered Dose

The scintigraphic measure of radioactivity deposited on nasal wipes, expressed as a percent of the delivered dose (i.e., the total amount of radioactivity delivered), over 10 minutes (at approximately 2 minute intervals post-dose) following nasal inhalation of a ciclesonide radiolabeled solution via a novel nasal MDI and a mometasone radiolabeled suspension via an aqueous nasal spray. (NCT01371786)
Timeframe: Average of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 minutes post dose

Interventionpercentage of radiolabeled (Mean)
Ciclesonide Nasal Aerosol0.98
Mometasone13.15

[back to top]

Initial Deposition of Radioactivity Within the Nasopharynx as a Percent of Delivered Dose

The scintigraphic measure of radioactivity initially deposited (approximately 2 minutes post-dose) within the nasopharynx, expressed as a percent of the delivered dose (i.e., the total amount of radioactivity delivered), following nasal inhalation of a ciclesonide radiolabeled solution via a novel nasal MDI and a mometasone radiolabeled suspension via an aqueous nasal spray. (NCT01371786)
Timeframe: Day 1 at 2 minutes post-dose

Interventionpercentage of radiolabeled (Mean)
Ciclesonide Nasal Aerosol0.03
Mometasone1.58

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Congestion/Obstruction Score

At Baseline, the Investigator and participant jointly evaluated the signs and symptoms of congestion/obstruction. After Baseline, participants scored the signs and symptoms of congestion/obstruction every morning immediately prior to dosing using a morning instantaneous congestion/obstruction score. This score reflected the participant's condition at that time (instantaneous) and ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe), with a lower score indicating less congestion/obstruction. Congestion/obstruction scores were averaged over Weeks 1-4 of the treatment period. Data are compared using Least Square (LS) Means. LS Mean Change from Baseline = LS Mean Score averaged over Weeks 1-4 - LS Mean Score for Baseline. (NCT01386125)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1-4

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
MFNS-0.56
Placebo-0.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Polyp Size Score

An endoscopic nasal examination was performed by the Investigator. Bilateral nasal polyps were scored as follows for each notril (left and right): 0=no polyps, 1=polyps in middle meatus not reaching below inferior border of middle turbinate, 2=polyps reaching below inferior border of middle turbinate but not inferior border of inferior turbinate, 3=large polyps reaching to or below the lower borders of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle turbinate. Total polyp size score ranged from 0 to 6 (scored 0 to 3 for each nostril), with a lower score indicating smaller-sized polyps. LS Mean Change from Baseline = LS Mean Score for Week 16 - LS Mean Score for Baseline. (NCT01386125)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
MFNS-0.76
Placebo-0.45

[back to top]

The Percentage of Subjects Experiencing AEs

(NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Over both two-week treatment periods combined

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ciclesonide28.9
Mometasone21.5

[back to top]

The Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Nasal AEs, Including Epistaxis, Nasal Ulceration, and Nasal Perforation

(NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Over both two-week treatment periods combined

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ciclesonide1.9
Mometasone1.3

[back to top]

Total Preference Composite Score Assessed at the End of the Study. The Total Preference Score is the Standardized Sum of 17 Individual Preference Items

"For the 17 individual items, patients were forced to choose their preference between ciclesonide and mometasone (item choices: 1 = prefer ciclesonide; 0 = prefer mometasone). The items for the Total Preference Score assessed 16 treatment attributes and one overall treatment preference: Ease of use, Convenience, Flexibility in daily activities, Taste, Use in public, Smell, Less run out of nose, Longer relief, Less run down of throat, Symptom relief, If both were the same price, Better appearance, Less nasal irritation, Faster relief, Number of sprays per dose, Makes nose feel, and Overall - the one preferred. The score is based on the proportion of items (x 100) preferred for ciclesonide and a score of 50 indicates no preference and scores over 50 indicate preference for ciclesonide. This analysis presents the comparison of ciclesonide versus mometasone and provides the score in relation to the preference for ciclesonide." (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: End of Study - Day 43

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Ciclesonide Versus Mometasone68.3

[back to top]

Treatment Outcome Composite Score Assessed at the End of the Study

Reflects preference on items concerned with perceived drug effectiveness (longer relief; symptom relief; prefer if both were the same price; for feeling better about your appearance; for few problems with irritation to nose; faster relief; how it makes your nose feel). The score is based on the proportion of items (x 100) preferred for ciclesonide and a score of 50 indicates an equal number of items preferred in the two groups. Larger values than 50 indicated greater than 50 percent of the subjects indicated preference for ciclesonide, while smaller values than 50 indicated greater than 50 percent preference for mometasone. Data is presented as the mean treatment outcome composite score. This analysis presents the comparison of ciclesonide versus mometasone in relation to preference for ciclesonide. (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: End of Study - Day 43

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Ciclesonide61.598

[back to top]

Treatment Process Composite Preference Score

"The Treatment Process Composite Preference Score is a standardized sum of 9 individual preference items (Ease of use, Convenience, Flexibility Daily Activity, Taste, Use in public, Smell. Less Run out of nose, Less Run down of throat, Number Sprays Dose). For each of these 9 individual items, patients were forced to choose their preference between ciclesonide nasal aerosol 74 mcg and mometasone AQ 200 mcg. Larger values greater than 50 indicated greater preference for ciclesonide, while smaller values less than 50 indicated greater preference for mometasone." (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: End of Study - Day 43

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Ciclesonide74.087

[back to top]

Work/Disability Days: Bed Days

Assessed at the end of each two-week treatment period (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Period 1 (days 0-14), Period 2 (days 29-43)

,
InterventionIncidence Rate (#events/person-days) (Number)
Period 1Period 2
Ciclesonide0.0180.009
Mometasone0.0130.018

[back to top]

Work/Disability Days: Missed Work

Assessed at the end of each two-week treatment period (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Period 1 (days 0-14), Period 2 (days 29-43)

,
InterventionIncidence Rate (#events/person-days) (Number)
Period 1Period 2
Ciclesonide0.0020.004
Mometasone0.0050.004

[back to top]

Work/Disability Days: Reduced Activity Days

Assessed at the end of each two-week treatment period (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Period 1 (days 0-14), Period 2 (days 29-43)

,
InterventionIncidence Rate (#events/person-days) (Number)
Period 1Period 2
Ciclesonide0.0390.017
Mometasone0.0670.039

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Regimen Difficulties

This subscale evaluates the patient's degree of pain, discomfort and side effects perceived to be associated with treatment, and the extent to which pain and discomfort were bothersome. Scores range from 0 (lower satisfaction) to 100 (higher satisfaction). (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Baseline for this measurement was Day 1 for Treatment Period 1 and Day 29 for Treatment Period 2. The assessment for Treatment Period 1 was on Day 14 and for Treatment Period 2 on Day 42

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide-7.58
Mometasone-0.13

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Regimen Adaptation

This subscale evaluates the patient's assessment of the convenience of the treatment, whether the treatment was one the subject would recommend to other persons with the same condition, and the level of satisfaction with the current treatment. Scores range from 0 (lower satisfaction) to 100 (higher satisfaction). (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Baseline for this measurement was Day 1 for Treatment Period 1 and Day 29 for Treatment Period 2. The assessment for Treatment Period 1 was on Day 14 and for Treatment Period 2 on Day 42

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide6.65
Mometasone2.19

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Interference

This subscale evaluates the patient's assessment of the degree to which allergy symptoms or side effects of the nasal spray interfered with daily routine, meals, recreation, family life, sleep schedules, energy levels, making plans, traveling, having fun and overall quality of life. Scores range from 0 (lower satisfaction) to 100 (higher satisfaction). (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Baseline for this measurement was Day 1 for Treatment Period 1 and Day 29 for Treatment Period 2. The assessment for Treatment Period 1 was on Day 14 and for Treatment Period 2 on Day 42

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide17.31
Mometasone14.36

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Burden

This subscale evaluates the patient's assessment of the level of degree of burden that treatment for allergic rhinitis imposes on a number of areas, including adherence to the treatment regimen, exercise, performing daily activities, social activities, and enjoying life. Scores range from 0 (lower satisfaction) to 100 (higher satisfaction). (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Baseline for this measurement was Day 1 for Treatment Period 1 and Day 29 for Treatment Period 2. The assessment for Treatment Period 1 was on Day 14 and for Treatment Period 2 on Day 42

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide10.45
Mometasone8.23

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Functional Impact Composite Score

A combination of the Interference Scale, the Role Limitation Scale, and the Burden Scale. The composite score and the subscales all range from 0 (lower satisfaction) to 100 (higher satisfaction). This is an unweighted average of the combined scales. (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Baseline for this measurement was Day 1 for Treatment Period 1 and Day 29 for Treatment Period 2. The assessment for Treatment Period 1 was on Day 14 and for Treatment Period 2 on Day 42

Interventionscores on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide12.36
Mometasone9.70

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Regimen Acceptance Composite Score

A combination of the Perceived Relief Scale and the Regimen Adaptation Scale. The composite score and all subscales range from 0 (lower satisfaction) to 100 (higher satisfaction). This is an unweighted average of the combined scales. (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Baseline for this measurement was Day 1 for Treatment Period 1 and Day 29 for Treatment Period 2. The assessment for Treatment Period 1 was on Day 14 and for Treatment Period 2 on Day 42

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide7.34
Mometasone2.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Subject-reported AM and PM rTNSS Averaged Over Each 2-week Treatment Period.

The reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) is the sum of 4 Nasal Symptoms: Runny Nose, Sneezing, Itchy Nose, and Nasal Congestion. These symptoms were assessed each morning and evening, and their totals averaged to obtain a daily average rTNSS. These daily averages were averaged over the 6 days prior to treatment to obtain the baseline value, and over the 14 days of each two-week period to obtain the on-treatment averages. The baseline values were then subtracted from the on-treatment averages to obtain the change from baseline scores. Subjects assess each individual symptoms on a scale of 0-3 where: 0 = absent, 1 = mild ,2 = moderate ,3 = severe Therefore, rTNSS values range from 0-12 (with 0 representing an absence of symptoms and higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms). Reflective TNSS measures these symptoms over the previous 12-hour time interval. (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Averages over each two week treatment period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide-2.4
Mometasone-2.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Regimen Attributes Composite Score

The Regimen Attributes Composite Score is a composite of the Sensory Impact and Regimen Management Scales of the Allergic Rhinitis Treatment Satisfaction and Preference Scales. The Regimen Management Scale assess patient satisfaction with issues relating to dosing, ability to remember to use the spray, the ease/difficulty of the spray, and convenience of the treatment. The Sensory Impact Scale assess patient satisfaction with issues relating to sensory attributes, including medication running out of the nose, medication running down the throat, impact on smell/taste, etc. Scores range from 0 (lower satisfaction) to 100 (higher satisfaction). (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Baseline for this measurement was Day 1 for Treatment Period 1 and Day 29 for Treatment Period 2. The assessment for Treatment Period 1 was on Day 14 and for Treatment Period 2 on Day 42

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide13.90
Mometasone4.88

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Sensory Impact

This subscale evaluates the patient's assessment of the sensory attributes including medication running out of the nose, medication running down the throat, and impact on smell and taste. Issues regarding skipping the medication because of the way the nose feels and wanting to try other medications to find a better one are also included. Scores range from 0 (lower satisfaction) to 100 (higher satisfaction). (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Baseline for this measurement was Day 1 for Treatment Period 1 and Day 29 for Treatment Period 2. The assessment for Treatment Period 1 was on Day 14 and for Treatment Period 2 on Day 42

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide21.37
Mometasone4.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Role Limitation

This subscale evaluates the patient's assessment of the degree of interference with social interactions with family, friends, travel, having fun, problems in performing work or social roles and how flexible the treatment was with scheduling life activities. Scores range from 0 (lower satisfaction) to 100 (higher satisfaction). (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Baseline for this measurement was Day 1 for Treatment Period 1 and Day 29 for Treatment Period 2. The assessment for Treatment Period 1 was on Day 14 and for Treatment Period 2 on Day 42

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide9.35
Mometasone6.62

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Regimen Management

This subscale evaluates the patient's assessment of issues relating to dosing (number of times and the time required to dose), ability to remember to use the spray, the ease/difficulty of the spray and several questions further pertaining to the convenience of the treatment. Scores range from 0 (lower satisfaction) to 100 (higher satisfaction). (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Baseline for this measurement was Day 1 for Treatment Period 1 and Day 29 for Treatment Period 2. The assessment for Treatment Period 1 was on Day 14 and for Treatment Period 2 on Day 42

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide6.41
Mometasone5.38

[back to top]

The Change From Baseline in Overall Quality of Life Composite Score

Mean of all items in the Mental and Emotional Health and General Health Perceptions scales. Scores range from 100 (lower satisfaction) to 500 (higher satisfaction) (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Baseline for this measurement was Day 1 for Treatment Period 1 and Day 29 for Treatment Period 2. The assessment for Treatment Period 1 was on Day 14 and for Treatment Period 2 on Day 42

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide6.64
Mometasone6.31

[back to top]

The Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Perceived Relief

The patient's perceived level of relief along with the degree of satisfaction associated with that amount of relief was evaluated within this scale. Scores range from 0 (lower satisfaction) to 100 (higher satisfaction). (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Baseline for this measurement was Day 1 for Treatment Period 1 and Day 29 for Treatment Period 2. The assessment for Treatment Period 1 was on Day 14 and for Treatment Period 2 on Day 42

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide8.05
Mometasone3.77

[back to top]

The Number of Subjects Experiencing AEs

(NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Over both two-week treatment periods combined

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ciclesonide90
Mometasone67

[back to top]

The Number of Subjects Experiencing Nasal AEs, Including Epistaxis, Nasal Ulceration, and Nasal Perforation

(NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Over both two-week treatment periods combined

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ciclesonide6
Mometasone4

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Rating Scale: Hassle

This subscale focuses specifically on the patient's assessment of the amount of bother and hassle of the treatment regimen, including coordinating activities, dosing, carrying supplies, rubbing nose or eyes, blowing nose repeatedly, or facial puffiness. Scores range from 0 (lower satisfaction) to 100 (higher satisfaction). Scores range from 0 (lower satisfaction) to 100 (higher satisfaction). (NCT01401465)
Timeframe: Baseline for this measurement was Day 1 for Treatment Period 1 and Day 29 for Treatment Period 2. The assessment for Treatment Period 1 was on Day 14 and for Treatment Period 2 on Day 42

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Ciclesonide24.7
Mometasone17.4

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Time-to-First Serious Asthma Outcomes (SAO): Number of First SAO in the MF/F vs MF Arms

The primary safety outcome was the time-to-first SAO (a composite endpoint of adjudicated asthma-related hospitalizations, adjudicated asthma-related intubations, and adjudicated asthma-related deaths). To accomplish this, the number of participants experiencing a first SAO was collected for 26 weeks following initiation of study treatment (or 7 days after the last treatment dose, whichever occurred later). Data generated by this methodology were used to compute a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), modeling the likelihood of a first SAO occurring at any given time in the MF/F arm relative to the MF arm. Although data were sufficient to generate a HR and 95% CI, time-to-first SAO in the overall population could not be accurately reported due to insufficient SAO occurrence. Therefore, the number of first SAO in either arm is reported as a descriptive measure. For each participant, first SAO denotes first event per participant. (NCT01471340)
Timeframe: 26 weeks, or 7 days after the last treatment dose, whichever occurred later

InterventionSerious asthma outcomes (Number)
MF/F MDI BID39
MF MDI BID32

[back to top]

Number of SAO Components in MF/F Participants vs MF Participants

To further examine the primary safety outcome, each adjudicated component of the SAO composite endpoint (asthma-related hospitalization, asthma-related intubation and asthma-related death), was tabulated for descriptive purposes only to show the relative contribution of each component to the SAO composite. Hospitalizations were defined as an in-patient stay of >= 24 hour in a hospital, emergency department or equivalent healthcare facility. Intubation was defined as endotracheal intubation only. (NCT01471340)
Timeframe: 26 weeks, or 7 days after the last treatment dose, whichever occurred later

,
InterventionSAO components (Number)
First SAOAsthma-related hospitalizationsAsthma-related intubationsAsthma-related deaths
MF MDI BID323200
MF/F MDI BID393900

[back to top]

Time-to-First Severe Asthma Exacerbation (SAEX): Number of First SAEX in the MF/F vs MF Arms

The key secondary efficacy outcome was time-to-first protocol-defined asthma exacerbation (SAEX). The SAEX were deteriorations of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids (tablets, suspension, or injection) for >= 3 consecutive days, in-patient hospitalization >= 24 hours, or an emergency department (ED) visit < 24 hours that required systemic corticosteroids in the MF/F MDI BID arm versus the MF MDI BID arm. The number of first SAEX occurred from initiation of study treatment to 7 days after the last treatment (modified intention-to-treat). This outcome was measured as the HR and 95% CI for the number of first SAEX in the MF/F MDI BID arm versus the number of first SAEX in the MF MDI BID arm. Given insufficient data for SAEX events, it was not informative to report the time-to-first SAEX in the overall population. Therefore, the number of first SAEXs in either arm is reported as a descriptive measure. For each participant, first SAEX denotes first event per participant. (NCT01471340)
Timeframe: 26 weeks, plus 7 days after the last treatment

InterventionAsthma exacerbations (Number)
MF/F MDI BID708
MF MDI BID779

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Morning (AM) Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) - MF MDI vs. Placebo

FEV1 is the amount of air, measured in liters, forcibly exhaled in 1 second. Pulmonary function tests were to be performed by participants in the morning before dosing. The percent predicted FEV1 equals the participant's observed FEV1 divided by the participant's predicted FEV1 (determined by height and race) and converted to a percentage by multiplying by 100%. The goal of the primary outcome measure was to compare the change from Baseline in AM FEV1 between the MF MDI and Placebo treatment groups. The comparison between the MF MDI 50 mcg BID vs. MF DPI 100 mcg QD treatment groups is presented in a subsequent outcome measure. (NCT01502371)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercentage of Predicted FEV1 (Least Squares Mean)
MF MDI 50 mcg BID4.52
MF MDI 100 mcg BID6.95
MF MDI 200 mcg BID6.00
Placebo0.66

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted AM FEV1 - MF MDI 50 mcg BID vs. MF DPI 100 mcg QD

FEV1 is the amount of air, measured in liters, forcibly exhaled in 1 second. Pulmonary function tests were to be performed by participants in the morning before dosing. The percent predicted FEV1 equals the participant's observed FEV1 divided by the participant's predicted FEV1 (determined by height and race) and converted to a percentage by multiplying by 100%. The goal of the secondary outcome measure was to compare the change from Baseline in AM FEV1 between the MF MDI 50 mcg BID and MF DPI 100 mcg QD treatment groups. The comparisons between the other MF MDI BID and Placebo treatment groups are presented in a previous outcome measure. (NCT01502371)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercentage of Predicted FEV1 (Least Squares Mean)
MF MDI 50 mcg BID4.52
MF DPI 100 mcg QD3.13

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardised Activities (PAQLQ(S)) Total Score - MF MDI vs. Placebo

The PAQLQ(S) consists of 23 questions in 3 categories: Symptoms (10 items), Activity Limitations (5 items), and Emotional Function (8 items). Responses are based on a 7-point scale (7=not bothered at all to 1=extremely bothered). PAQLQ(S) Total Scores could range from 23 to 161, with a lower score indicating a lower quality of life. The PAQLQ(S) included only participants in participating countries in which a validated translated questionnaire was available. The goal of the secondary outcome measure was to compare the change from Baseline in PAQLQ(S) between the MF MDI and Placebo treatment groups. (NCT01502371)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionScore on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
MF MDI 50 mcg BID0.35
MF MDI 100 mcg BID0.38
MF MDI 200 mcg BID0.44
Placebo0.26
MF DPI 100 mcg QD0.47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) - MF MDI vs. Placebo

PEF, measured in liters per minute, is the highest flow during exhalation. Participants recorded diary entries for PEF twice daily (in the morning upon rising and in the evening at bedtime). The goal of the secondary outcome measure was to compare the change from Baseline in AM PEF between the MF MDI and Placebo treatment groups. (NCT01502371)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
MF MDI 50 mcg BID17.83
MF MDI 100 mcg BID26.03
MF MDI 200 mcg BID16.68
Placebo-1.32
MF DPI 100 mcg QD-0.92

[back to top]

Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After Days 8, 15 and 22 of Treatment

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured via spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Measurements were taken on days 8, 15 and 22 after treatment. Data within 6 hr of rescue medication use is excluded from this analysis. (NCT01555151)
Timeframe: Days 8, 15 and 22

,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 8 (n=178,173,181,181)Day 15 (n=179,171,177,178)Day 22 (n=174,170,177,177)
Mometasone Furoate 200 ug Daily Via the Twisthaler® Device2.0572.0482.071
Mometasone Furoate 320 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device2.1132.1342.175
Mometasone Furoate 80 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device2.0692.0952.126
Mometasone Furoate 800 ug Via the Twisthaler® Device2.1112.1352.146

[back to top]

Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured via spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Measurements were taken on day 29 after treatment. (NCT01555151)
Timeframe: Day 29

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Mometasone Furoate 80 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device2.139
Mometasone Furoate 200 ug Daily Via the Twisthaler® Device2.071
Mometasone Furoate 320 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device2.187
Mometasone Furoate 800 ug Via the Twisthaler® Device2.162

[back to top]

Plasma Cortisol Concentrations

Blood samples were taken from each subject participating in the study post dose at day 1 and week 4. Cortisol concentrations were evaluated. Results are presented as nmol/L (NCT01555151)
Timeframe: Baseline, days 1 and 28

,,,
Interventionnmol/L (Mean)
Baseline (n= 183, 178, 179, 181)Day 1/1 Hr (n=179, 177,174, 176)Day 28/-25 Mins (n= 172, 169, 174, 172)Day 28/1 Hr (n= 172, 168, 174, 170)
Mometasone Furoate 200 ug Daily Via the Twisthaler® Device143.132106.965140.604107.931
Mometasone Furoate 320 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device143.791107.526143.555105.468
Mometasone Furoate 80 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device150.040118.130140.760105.399
Mometasone Furoate 800 ug Via the Twisthaler® Device150.108115.489145.484110.477

[back to top]

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)

FeNO is widely accepted as a non-invasive marker for airway inflammation such as asthma and conducted according to published guideline. FeNO was measured on days 15 and 29 after treatment. (NCT01555151)
Timeframe: Days 15 and 29

,,,
Interventionppm (Mean)
Day 15 (n= 142, 139, 139, 149)Day 29 (n=141, 143, 145, 150)
Mometasone Furoate 200 ug Daily Via the Twisthaler® Device26.76227.055
Mometasone Furoate 320 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device19.09818.468
Mometasone Furoate 80 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device25.28623.777
Mometasone Furoate 800 ug Via the Twisthaler® Device21.01719.981

[back to top]

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at All Time Points

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Data within 6 hr of rescue medication use is excluded from this analysis. Mixed model: FVC = treatment + gender+ baseline FVC + age + level of asthma control + region + center (region) + error. Center is included as a random effect nested within region. (NCT01555151)
Timeframe: Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 and 29 at all time points

,,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1/30 min post-dose (n=172,172,175,173)Day 1/1 hr post-dose (n=178,169,174,175)Day 8/50 min pre-dose (n=174,171,179,174)Day 8/15 min pre-dose (n=176,172,179,174)Day 15 /50 min pre-dose (n=175,169,170,169)Day 15/15 min pre-dose (n=176,168,176,167)Day 22/50 min pre-dose (n=172,167,174,169)Day 22/15 min pre-dose (n=169,170,174,172)Day 28/50 min pre-dose (n=172,168,176,172)Day 28/15 min pre-dose (n=170,165,174, 170)Day 28/30 min post-dose (n=175,166,174,170)Day 28/30 min post-dose (n=173,167,172,172)Day 29/23hr 10 min post-dose (n=173,162,172,168)Day 29/23hr 45 min post-dose (n=172,161, 175,170)
Mometasone Furoate 200 ug Daily Via the Twisthaler® Device2.8932.9133.0963.0743.0903.0763.0913.0963.1153.0953.0923.0843.1133.090
Mometasone Furoate 320 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device2.8612.9433.1343.1213.1683.1373.2033.1983.1843.1533.1513.1583.2163.192
Mometasone Furoate 80 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device2.8922.9303.1113.0993.1343.1093.1363.1343.1463.1353.1323.1403.1603.165
Mometasone Furoate 800 ug Via the Twisthaler® Device2.8972.9463.1393.1253.1553.1273.1523.1573.1803.1613.1843.1613.1943.158

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Forced Vital Capacity (FEV1/FVC) Percent at All Time Points

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) was measured via spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Data within 6 hr of rescue medication use is excluded from this analysis. (NCT01555151)
Timeframe: Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 and 29 at all time points

,,,
InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1/30 min post-dose (n=172,172,175,173)Day 1/1 hr post-dose (n=178,169,174,175)Day 8/50 min pre-dose (n=174,171,179,175)Day 8/15 min pre-dose (n=176,172,179,174)Day 15 /50 min pre-dose (n=176,169,170,169)Day 15/15 min pre-dose (n=176,168,176,167)Day 22/50 min pre-dose (n=172,167,174,169)Day 22/15 min pre-dose (n=169,170,174,172)Day 28/50 min pre-dose (n=172,168,176,172)Day 28/15 min pre-dose (n=170,165,174, 170)Day 28/30 min post-dose (n=175,166,174,170)Day 28/30 min post-dose (n=173,167,172,172)Day 29/23hr 10 min post-dose (n=173,162,172,168)Day 29/23hr 45 min post-dose (n=172,161, 175,170)
Mometasone Furoate 200 ug Daily Via the Twisthaler® Device64.89864.83366.30166.79066.12266.00666.56766.88566.83567.29667.01366.83266.71166.541
Mometasone Furoate 320 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device65.18465.00567.34467.77867.48767.60767.83168.14368.12468.25568.03168.24368.26567.961
Mometasone Furoate 80 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device65.04365.17766.56666.59567.00766.87867.08167.40367.12867.50367.70067.94567.42767.630
Mometasone Furoate 800 ug Via the Twisthaler® Device64.89865.07266.56867.15667.13967.51467.74267.89567.81067.87868.12668.05767.59267.831

[back to top]

Percentage of Days With no Rescue Medication Use Over 4 Weeks of Treatment

"Mixed model used: percentage of days with no rescue medication use = treatment + age + gender + baseline percentage of days with no rescue use + level of asthma control + region + center (region) + error. Center is included as a random effect nested within region.~A day with no rescue use is defined from diary data as any day where the subject does not use any puffs of rescue medication.~The total number of days with no rescue use over the 4 week treatment period is divided by the total number of evaluable days in order to derive the percentage of days with no rescue use." (NCT01555151)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionpercentage days (Least Squares Mean)
Mometasone Furoate 80 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device74.148
Mometasone Furoate 200 ug Daily Via the Twisthaler® Device75.236
Mometasone Furoate 320 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device75.157
Mometasone Furoate 800 ug Via the Twisthaler® Device80.578

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) by Visit

Asthma symptoms were evaluated by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ). The ACQ-5 has five questions of the asthma symptoms to be answered by the patient. The overall score is the average of the 5 questions; a minimum overall score of 0 = good control of asthma whereas a maximum overall score of 6 = poor control of asthma. A negative change in score indicates improvement in symptoms. MIXED model: Change from baseline in ACQ-5 = treatment + gender + baseline ACQ-5 score + age + level of asthma control + region + center (region) + error. Center is included as a random effect nested within region. - Baseline ACQ-5 is defined as the questionnaire completed on Day 1 (randomization). (NCT01555151)
Timeframe: Baseline, days 8,15,22 and 29

,,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Day 8-baseline (n=179,176,182,182)Day 15-baseline(n=180,174,179,178)Day 22-baseline (n=178,173,178,177)Day 29-baseline (n=179,176,181,182)
Mometasone Furoate 200 ug Daily Via the Twisthaler® Device-0.730-0.908-0.982-1.109
Mometasone Furoate 320 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device-0.908-1.117-1.262-1.329
Mometasone Furoate 80 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device-0.662-0.899-0.994-1.079
Mometasone Furoate 800 ug Via the Twisthaler® Device-0.890-0.973-1.097-1.162

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) Over 4 Weeks of Treatment

Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was measured via electronice Peak flow meter by patient at home. Mixed model used: change from baseline in the mean evening PEFR = treatment + age + gender + baseline evening PEFR + level of asthma control + region + center (region)+ error. Center is included as a random effect nested within region. (NCT01555151)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4

,,,
InterventionLiters per min (Least Squares Mean)
Morning 4 wks-baseline (n=177,171, 175, 182)Evening 4 wks-baseline (n=176, 172, 174, 179)
Mometasone Furoate 200 ug Daily Via the Twisthaler® Device3.9550.293
Mometasone Furoate 320 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device2.785-0.644
Mometasone Furoate 80 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device-4.9521.354
Mometasone Furoate 800 ug Via the Twisthaler® Device1.6066.287

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Over 4 Weeks of Treatment

Rescue medication data recorded during the 14 day run-in period is used to calculate the baseline. - Total number of puffs of rescue medication per day over the full 4 weeks is calculated and divided by the total number of days with non-missing rescue medication data to derive the mean daily number of puffs of rescue medication taken for the subject. - MIXED model: Change = treatment + gender + baseline mean daily number of puffs + age + level of asthma control + region + center (region) + error. Center is included as a random effect nested within region. (NCT01555151)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks

Interventionnumber of puffs (Least Squares Mean)
Mometasone Furoate 80 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device-0.456
Mometasone Furoate 200 ug Daily Via the Twisthaler® Device-0.391
Mometasone Furoate 320 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device-0.600
Mometasone Furoate 800 ug Via the Twisthaler® Device-0.677

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Flow Between 25% and 75% (FEF25-75%) at All Time Points

The Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25%-75% measurement describes the amount of air expelled from the lungs during the middle half (25% - 75%) of the forced vital capacity test and is measured using spirometry. (NCT01555151)
Timeframe: Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 and 29 at all time points

,,,
InterventionLiters per second (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1/30 min post-dose (n=172,172,175,172)Day 1/1 hr post-dose (n=178,169,174,174)Day 8/50 min pre-dose (n=173,171,179,174)Day 8/15 min pre-dose (n=175,172,179,173)Day 15 /50 min pre-dose (n=175,169,170,169)Day 15/15 min pre-dose (n=175,168,176,167)Day 22/50 min pre-dose (n=171,167,174,169)Day 22/15 min pre-dose (n=168,170,174,172)Day 28/50 min pre-dose (n=171,168,176,172)Day 28/15 min pre-dose (n=169,165,174, 170)Day 28/30 min post-dose (n=175,166,174,170)Day 28/30 min post-dose (n=172,167,172,172)Day 29/23hr 10 min post-dose (n=172,162,172,168)Day 29/23hr 45 min post-dose (n=171,161, 175,170)
Mometasone Furoate 200 ug Daily Via the Twisthaler® Device1.3001.3271.4491.4661.4301.4141.4401.4761.4581.4811.4571.4601.4511.438
Mometasone Furoate 320 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device1.3091.3161.5191.5421.5141.5201.5651.6001.5811.5741.5571.5771.6041.576
Mometasone Furoate 80 ug Daily Via the Concept1 Device1.3081.3371.4571.4581.5091.4941.5111.5401.5041.5291.5581.5661.5371.550
Mometasone Furoate 800 ug Via the Twisthaler® Device1.3081.3451.5251.5661.5441.5611.5551.5911.5981.5841.6151.5931.5841.571

[back to top]

Number of Participants With At Least One Serious AE

"A serious AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at~any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; is a congenital anomaly or birth defect; and/or cancer." (NCT01566149)
Timeframe: Up to Week 14

Interventionparticipants (Number)
MF/F 200/10 mcg MDI BID0
MF/F 400/10 mcg MDI BID0

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With At Least One Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. (NCT01566149)
Timeframe: Up to Week 14

Interventionparticipants (Number)
MF/F 200/10 mcg MDI BID5
MF/F 400/10 mcg MDI BID8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued From the Study Due to an AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. (NCT01566149)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
MF/F 200/10 mcg MDI BID0
MF/F 400/10 mcg MDI BID1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12

Baseline was defined as the highest FEV1 value of three assessments prior to first dose of study drug. If two (or all three) spirometry efforts had identical FEV1, the FEV1 from the effort with the highest Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) was to be recorded. Week 12 FEV1 was assessed as the morning FEV1 at the end of the dosing interval (trough FEV1). For participants who discontinued prior to Week 12, the FEV1 measurement from the discontinuation visit was to be be carried forward to Week 12 if (and only if) the participant's study medication compliance rate prior to discontinuation was at least 85%. (NCT01566149)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
Interventionliters (Mean)
Baseline FEV1Week 12 FEV1Change from Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12
MF/F 200/10 mcg MDI BID2.3972.5030.106
MF/F 400/10 mcg MDI BID2.2152.2700.054

[back to top]

Total Amounts (in Doses) of Systemic Corticosteroids Used to Treat Asthma Exacerbations Over the 12 Week Treatment Period

Total amounts (in doses) of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) used to treat asthma exacerbations.SCS includes Intramuscular (IM), Intravenous (IV) and Oral. A severe asthma exacerbation is SCS use ≥3 days and hospitalization or emergency department visit (greater than 24 h) or death due to asthma. A moderate asthma exacerbation is SCS use ≥3 days either as an outpatient or in emergency department visits (less than or equal to 24 h). Worsening of asthma not requiring more than 3 days of SCS or hospitalization/emergency room will be considered mild asthma exacerbations. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Interventionmilligrams (mg) (Mean)
IIntramuscular - Triamcinolone AcetonideIntravenous - BetamethasoneIntravenous- HydrocortisoneIntravenous- Hydrocortisone NA SuccinateIntravenous- Methylprednisolone NA SuccinateOral- MethylprednisoloneOral - PrednisoloneOral - PrednisoneOral - Prednisone equivalent dose
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg20410050080329040106.11
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µgNANA50030060NA6040102
Placebo04200NANANA37.5010058.61

[back to top]

Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) After 2 Weeks (Day 15), 4 Weeks (Day 29), and 8 Weeks (Day 57) of Treatment.

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured via spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FEV1 was defined as the average of measurements made 23 hours 10 minutes and 23 hours 45 minutes post-dose after 2 weeks (Day 15), 4 weeks (Day 29), and 8 weeks (Day 57) of treatment. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57

,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 15Day 29Day 57
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg2.1982.1962.227
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg2.1692.1802.180
Placebo2.0692.0572.099

[back to top]

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) on Day 1, Day 2, Day 14, Day 15, Day 84, Day 85 at All Time Points

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) was measured via spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. FVC is measured on Day 1, Day 2, Day 14, Day 15, Day 84, Day 85 at all time points (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2, Day 14, Day 15, Day 84, Day 85

,,
Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1 / 5 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 1 / 15 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 1 / 30 min post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 1 / 1 hr post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 1 / 2 hr post-dose (n=106,104,111)Day 1 / 4 hr post-dose (n=107,101,111)Day 1 / 6 hr post-dose (n=24,24,26)Day 2 / 23 hr 10min post-dose (n=107,104,110)Day 2 / 23 hr 45min post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 14 / 5 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 14 / 15 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 14 / 30 min post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 14 / 1 hr post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 14 / 2 hr post-dose (n=106,104,111)Day 14 / 4 hr post-dose (n=107,101,111)Day 14 / 6 hr post-dose (n=24,24,26)Day 15 / 23 hr 10min post-dose (n=107,104,110)Day 15 / 23 hr 45min post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 84 / 5 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 84 / 15 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 84 / 30 min post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 84 / 1hr post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 84 / 2 hr post-dose (n=106,104,111)Day 84 / 4 hr post-dose (n=106,101,111)Day 85 / 23 hr 10min post-dose (n=107,104,110)Day 85 / 23 hr 45min post-dose (n=107,104,111)
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg3.3383.3483.3673.3333.3673.3423.3453.3033.3413.3643.3773.3893.3793.3953.3383.4263.3113.3133.3743.3923.3993.3933.3823.3633.3003.321
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg3.3423.3723.3783.3563.3663.3463.2993.3143.3133.4043.3973.4123.4083.4023.3683.3323.3243.3473.3813.3933.4243.3943.4133.3463.3503.343
Placebo3.2353.2383.2393.2413.2683.2383.2803.2543.2693.2123.2133.2463.2063.2073.2173.2573.2373.2603.2633.2753.2823.2623.2923.2573.2873.294

[back to top]

Asthma Control Questionnaire 5 (ACQ-5) After 12 Weeks (Day 85)

The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) is a validated questionnaire consisting of 5 items for the assessment of asthma symptom which are night symptom, morning symptom, limitation for the activities, shortness of breath, and wheeze. The ACQ-5 score is the mean of the 5 questions and therefore between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled). A negative change in score indicates improvement in symptoms. MIXED model: Change from baseline in ACQ-5 = treatment + gender + baseline ACQ-5 score + age + level of asthma control + region + center (region) + error. Center is included as a random effect nested within region. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: aftert 12 weeks (Day 85)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg1.31
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg1.42
Placebo1.32

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients Who Permanently Discontinued Study Due to Asthma Exacerbation Over the 12 Week Treatment Period

The percentage of patients who permanently discontinued study due to asthma exacerbation. A severe asthma exacerbation is SCS use ≥3 days and hospitalization or emergency department visit (greater than 24 h) or death due to asthma. A moderate asthma exacerbation is SCS use ≥3 days either as an outpatient or in emergency department visits (less than or equal to 24 h). Worsening of asthma not requiring more than 3 days of SCS or hospitalization/emergency room will be considered mild asthma exacerbations. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg1.9
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg1.0
Placebo3.6

[back to top]

Time to Permanent Study Discontinuation Due to Asthma Exacerbation Over the 12 Week Treatment Period

Time to permanent study discontinuation due to asthma exacerbation. A severe asthma exacerbation is SCS use ≥3 days and hospitalization or emergency department visit (greater than 24 h) or death due to asthma. A moderate asthma exacerbation is SCS use ≥3 days either as an outpatient or in emergency department visits (less than or equal to 24 h). Worsening of asthma not requiring more than 3 days of SCS or hospitalization/emergency room will be considered mild asthma exacerbations. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µgNA
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µgNA
PlaceboNA

[back to top]

Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) After 12 Weeks (Day 85)

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured via spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FEV1 was defined as the average of measurements made 23 hours 10 minutes and 23 hours 45 minutes post-dose after 12 weeks (Day 85) (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: after 12 weeks (Day 85)

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg2.190
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg2.216
Placebo2.110

[back to top]

Asthma Control Questionnaire 5 (ACQ-5) After 4 Weeks (Day 29) and After 8 Weeks (Day 57) of Treatment

The ACQ-5 is a validated questionnaire consisting of 5 items for the assessment of asthma symptom which are night symptom, morning symptom, limitation for the activities, shortness of breath, and wheeze. Each item is graded on a scale of 0-6 and the questions are equally weighted. The ACQ-5 score is the mean of the 5 questions and therefore between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled). (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: after 4 weeks (Day 29) and after 8 weeks (Day 57)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Day 29 (n=103, 104, 108)Day 57 (n= 103, 104, 108)
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg1.391.29
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg1.431.42
Placebo1.551.46

[back to top]

Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ(S)) After 4 Weeks (Day 29) and 12 Weeks (Day 85) of Treatment

The AQLQ is a 32-item disease specific questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments in asthma. Patients are asked to score each item on a 7-point scale based on the experience of last 2 weeks. The overall AQLQ score is the mean response to all 32 questions. Therefore, the possible highest score (better) would be 7 and the lowest (worse) would be 1. Changes in scores of 0.5 to 1.0 are considered clinically meaningful; 1.0 to 1.5 as moderate and > 1.5 as marked clinically important differences for any individual domain or for the overall summary score. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: 4 Weeks, 12 Weeks

,,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Day 29 (n=103,104, 108)Day 85 (n=103,104, 108)
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg5.485.47
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg5.525.64
Placebo5.385.60

[back to top]

Duration of Asthma Exacerbations (Mild, Moderate, Severe, Moderate or Severe and Any) Over the 12 Week Treatment Period

Duration of asthma exacerbations by severity of exacerbation. A severe asthma exacerbation is SCS use ≥3 days and hospitalization or emergency department visit (greater than 24 h) or death due to asthma. A moderate asthma exacerbation is SCS use ≥3 days either as an outpatient or in emergency department visits (less than or equal to 24 h). Worsening of asthma not requiring more than 3 days of SCS or hospitalization/emergency room will be considered mild asthma exacerbations. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Interventiondays (Mean)
moderate or severe exacerbationsany asthma exacerbationsmild asthma exacerbationsmoderate asthma exacerbationsSevere asthma exacerbations
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg0.60.90.40.60.0
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg0.71.00.30.60.1
Placebo0.81.30.50.60.1

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF 25-75% )on Day 1, Day 2, Day 14, Day 15, Day 84, Day 85

Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF 25-75%) was measured via spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2, Day 14, Day 15, Day 84, Day 85

,,
Interventionliters/second (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1 / 5 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 1 / 15 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 1 / 30 min post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 1 / 1 hr post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 1 / 2 hr post-dose (n=106,104,111)Day 1 / 4 hr post-dose (n=107,101,111)Day 1 / 6 hr post-dose (n=24,24,26)Day 2 / 23 hr 10min post-dose (n=107,104,110)Day 2 / 23 hr 45min post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 14 / 5 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 14 / 15 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 14 / 30 min post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 14 / 1 hr post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 14 / 2 hr post-dose (n=106,104,111)Day 14 / 4 hr post-dose (n=107,101,111)Day 14 / 6 hr post-dose (n=24,24,26)Day 15 / 23 hr 10min post-dose (n=107,104,110)Day 15 / 23 hr 45min post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 84 / 5 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 84 / 15 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 84 / 30 min post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 84 / 1hr post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 84 / 2 hr post-dose (n=106,104,111)Day 84 / 4 hr post-dose (n=106,101,111)Day 85 / 23 hr 10min post-dose (n=107,104,110)Day 85 / 23 hr 45min post-dose (n=107,104,111)
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg1.4851.5631.5681.5941.6321.6251.6201.5201.5241.5711.5971.6071.6641.6761.6281.5191.4421.4921.6271.675106591.6871.7041.6481.5071.496
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg1.4201.4491.4671.4711.5081.4791.3641.4071.4361.5051.5401.5321.5691.5511.5261.3701.4211.4301.5351.5301.5481.5781.5711.5481.4371.476
Placebo1.2951.2951.3101.2971.3481.3291.3321.3101.3261.3181.3511.3361.3431.3381.3391.3631.3151.3191.3631.3721.3681.4041.3821.3501.3281.378

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)/ Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) on Day 1, Day 2, Day 14, Day 15, Day 84, Day 85

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) was measured via spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2, Day 14, Day 15, Day 84, Day 85

,,
Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1 / 5 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 1 / 15 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 1 / 30 min post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 1 / 1 hr post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 1 / 2 hr post-dose (n=106,104,111)Day 1 / 4 hr post-dose (n=107,101,111)Day 1 / 6 hr post-dose (n=24,24,26)Day 2 / 23 hr 10min post-dose (n=107,104,110)Day 2 / 23 hr 45min post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 14 / 5 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 14 / 15 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 14 / 30 min post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 14 / 1 hr post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 14 / 2 hr post-dose (n=106,104,111)Day 14 / 4 hr post-dose (n=107,101,111)Day 14 / 6 hr post-dose (n=24,24,26)Day 15 / 23 hr 10min post-dose (n=107,104,110)Day 15 / 23 hr 45min post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 84 / 5 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 84 / 15 min post-dose (n=107,105,111)Day 84 / 30 min post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 84 / 1hr post-dose (n=107,104,111)Day 84 / 2 hr post-dose (n=106,104,111)Day 84 / 4 hr post-dose (n=106,101,111)Day 85 / 23 hr 10min post-dose (n=107,104,110)Day 85 / 23 hr 45min post-dose (n=107,104,111)
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg66.04967.03967.18967.62067.82467.96868.84666.94266.79167.36667.57767.76568.26268.39768.04467.34665.93066.43567.76267.90767.8653.3933.3823.3633.3003.321
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg65.60865.60265.73866.08966.60766.09464.71665.46565.80966.54867.18767.02467.10067.53866.86664.79265.43665.60667.04067.16266.9363.3943.4133.3463.3503.343
Placebo63.46163.53763.76763.74464.14164.21263.77363.82263.74164.36264.70264.19264.38364.61764.42664.16764.02763.72664.85065.07464.8483.2623.2923.2573.2873.294

[back to top]

Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) Over 12 Weeks of Treatment. This is LS Mean of the Treatment Period.

PEFR is measured with portable spirometer by participants every morning and evening at home. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: baseline, 4weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks

,,
Interventionliters/second (Least Squares Mean)
Morning Baseline - <4 weeks (n=104,100,109)Evening baseline - <4 weeks (n=104,100,109)Morning 4 weeks - <8 weeks (n=104,100,109)Evening 4 weeks - <8 weeks (n=104,100,109)Morning 8 weeks - <12 weeks (n=104,100,109)Evening 8 weeks - <12 weeks (n=104,100,109)
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg335.44345.99338.23344.63334.83342.40
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg326.98332.96328.45333.36329.85332.61
Placebo307.68312.42315.60313.31317.03316.28

[back to top]

Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Day 1, 2 Weeks (Day 14), 12 Weeks (Day 84)

Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured via spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Peak FEV1 is defined as the maximum FEV1 during the first 4 h post morning dosing at Day 1, 2Weeks and 12 Weeks. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: Day 1, 2 weeks (Day 14), 12 weeks (Day 84)

,,
Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Day 14Day 84
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg2.3532.3872.403
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg2.2872.3452.345
Placebo2.1722.1652.215

[back to top]

Plasma Indacaterol Concentrations at Day 1 and Day 14

Maximum plasma concentration after drug administration (Cmax) was measured for indacaterol acetate 75 µg and indacaterol acetate 150 µg for Pharmacokinetic (PK) Subgroup (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 14

,
Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Day 1 (n=21, 21)Day 14 (n=21, 21)
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg164285
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg70.7129

[back to top]

Standardized Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) at (5 Min - 4 h), (5 Min - 1 h) (1 h - 4 h) Measured on Day 1, 2 Weeks (Day 14)&12 Weeks (Day 84)

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)/Area Under the Curve(AUC) was measured via spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards.FEV1 AUC(5 min - 4 h), (5 min - 1 h) and (1 h - 4 h) are measured at Day 1, 2 Weeks (Day 14) and 12 Weeks (Day84) and defined as average of FEV1 at specified timepoints above. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: Day 1, 2 Weeks, 12 Weeks

,,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1 (5min-4h) (n=107,105,111)Day 1 (5min-1h) (n=107,105,111)Day 1 (1h-4h) (n=107,104,111)Day 14 (5min-4h) (n=107,105,111)Day 14 (5min-1h) (n=107,105,111)Day 14 (1h-4h) (n=107,104,111)Day 84 (5min-4h) (n=107,105,111)Day 84 (5min-1h) (n=107,105,111)Day 84 (1h-4h) (n=107,104,111)
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg2.2742.2532.2842.3132.2992.3182.3222.3212.322
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg2.2092.1982.2122.2652.2672.2622.2642.2652.263
Placebo2.0772.0592.0822.0742.0692.0662.1322.1192.130

[back to top]

The Annual Rate of Asthma Exacerbations (Mild, Moderate, Severe, Moderate or Severe and Any) Over the 12 Week Treatment Period

Annual incidence rate of asthma exacerbation by severity of exacerbation. The number of asthma exacerbation is used to calculate annual incidence rate. A severe asthma exacerbation is SCS use ≥3 days and hospitalization or emergency department visit (greater than 24 h) or death due to asthma. A moderate asthma exacerbation is SCS use ≥3 days either as an outpatient or in emergency department visits (less than or equal to 24 h). Worsening of asthma not requiring more than 3 days of SCS or hospitalization/emergency room will be considered mild asthma exacerbations. Number of the asthma exacerbation will be analyzed by the negative binomial regression including treatment, history of asthma exacerbation in the 12 months prior to screening and region as factors and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 30 min post inhalation of salbutamol/albuterol (components of SABA reversibility) as covariates. The estimates are obtained from the model and so we cannot specify a formula. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Intervention# of exacerbations (Number)
Moderate or Severe ExacerbationAny asthma exacerbationMild Asthma ExacerbationModerate Asthma ExacerbationSevere Asthma Exacerbation
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg0.3530.5690.0010.3200.000
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg0.3150.4210.0000.2250.000
Placebo0.3520.7880.0010.2740.000

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients With at Least One Asthma Exacerbation (Mild, Moderate, Severe, Moderate or Severe and Any) Over the 12 Week Treatment Period

The percentage of patients with at least one asthma exacerbation by severity of exacerbation. A severe asthma exacerbation is SCS use ≥3 days and hospitalization or emergency department visit (greater than 24 h) or death due to asthma. A moderate asthma exacerbation is SCS use ≥3 days either as an outpatient or in emergency department visits (less than or equal to 24 h). Worsening of asthma not requiring more than 3 days of SCS or hospitalization/emergency room will be considered mild asthma exacerbations. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
moderate or severe asthma exacerbationsany asthma exacerbationsmild asthma exacerbationsmoderate asthma exacerbationssevere asthma exacerbations
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg5.78.63.85.70.0
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg5.68.42.84.70.9
Placebo4.59.95.44.50.9

[back to top]

The Usage of Rescue Medication (Short Acting β2-agonist) Over 12 Weeks of Treatment

Participants record the number of puffs of rescue medication taken in the previous 12 hours in the morning and nighttime. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Interventionnumber of puffs (Least Squares Mean)
Mean daily number of puffs (n=105, 102, 105)Mean Daytime number of puffs (n=103, 99, 100)Mean nighttime number of puffs (n=104, 100, 107)
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µg0.990.550.47
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µg1.080.540.55
Placebo1.310.730.64

[back to top]

Time to First Asthma Exacerbation (Mild, Moderate, Severe, Moderate or Severe and Any) Over the 12 Week Treatment Period

Duration of treatment until first asthma exacerbation by severity of exacerbation. A severe asthma exacerbation is systemic corticosteroids (SCS) use ≥3 days and hospitalization or emergency department visit (greater than 24 h) or death due to asthma. A moderate asthma exacerbation is SCS use ≥3 days either as an outpatient or in emergency department visits (less than or equal to 24 h). Worsening of asthma not requiring more than 3 days of SCS or hospitalization/emergency room will be considered mild asthma exacerbations. (NCT01609478)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Interventionweeks (Median)
Moderate or Severe exacerbationAny Asthma ExacerbationMild Asthma ExacerbationModerate Asthma ExacerbationSevere Asthma Exacerbation
Indacaterol Acetate 150 µgNANANANANA
Indacaterol Acetate 75 µgNANANANANA
PlaceboNANANANANA

[back to top]

Change in Steroid Sensitivity in Vivo Nasal Endoscopy Polyp Scores

To assess steroid sensitivity in subjects comparing nasal endoscopy polyp score before and following 4 weeks treatment with mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS). Nasal endoscopic polyp score measured on 0 to 4 scale ( 0 = no nasal polyp; 1 = polyp in the middle meatus, not below the inferior border of the middle turbinate (MT); 2 = polyp below the inferior border of the MT but not touching the inferior turbinate (IT); 3 = polyp below the inferior border of the MT and touching the IT; 4 = polyp to or below the lower border of the IT). The outcome is the difference in mean score (Post - Pre). A negative difference would indicate that patients had a reduction in nasal polyp size at the end of the study. (NCT01616160)
Timeframe: Change between pre- and post-treatment symptom score after 4 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Right nasal polypLeft nasal polyp
Nasal Polyps Subjects0-0.25

[back to top]

Change in Steroid Sensitivity in Vivo Symptom Scores - Trouble With Sense of Smell

To assess steroid sensitivity in subjects comparing Trouble with sense of smell symptom scores before and following 4 weeks treatment with mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS). Trouble with sense of smell measured on 0 to 4 scale ( 0 = no trouble with smell; 4 = severe trouble with smell). The outcome is the difference in mean score (Post - Pre). A negative difference would indicate patients had less trouble with sense of smell at the end of the study. (NCT01616160)
Timeframe: Change between pre- and post-treatment symptom score after 4 weeks of treatment

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Nasal Polyps Subjects-0.9

[back to top]

Medication Side-effect and Compliance Inventory

The medication side-effect and compliance inventory is a questionnaire to evaluate the frequency and severity of common side effects associated with the medications used in this study. (NCT01676415)
Timeframe: 4-6 weeks and 3 months after initiation of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Prednisone0
Topical Mometasone0

[back to top]

Taskforce Symptom Inventory

Change from baseline in individual symptom severity. The taskforce symptom inventory is a visual analog scale of the severity of the 4 major symptoms making up the clinical diagnostic criteria of CRS. (NCT01676415)
Timeframe: 4-6 weeks and 3 months after initiation of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Prednisone0
Topical Mometasone0

[back to top]

SNOT-22 Questionnaire

"The Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 is a validated questionnaire that measures 22 nasal and quality of life symptoms (nasal obstruction and loss of smell and taste) ranked from 0 (not a problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be).~Min score= 0, Max score= 110 (worst possible problem on all symptoms)~Change from baseline of the SNOT-22 score. The SNOT-22 questionnaire is a 22-item disease-specific health related quality of life instrument validated for use in chronic rhinosinusitis." (NCT01676415)
Timeframe: 4-6 weeks and 3 months after initiation of treatment

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
4-6 WEEKS3 MONTHS
Prednisone45.7549
Topical Mometasone34.434.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience At Least One Adverse Event (AE)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. (NCT01700192)
Timeframe: Up to 54 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
MK-8237676
Placebo539

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AE

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. (NCT01700192)
Timeframe: Up to 52 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
MK-823773
Placebo19

[back to top]

Average Total Combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Score (TCS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment

The TCS is the sum of the rhinoconjunctivitis DSS (rhinitis DSS and conjunctivitis DSS; range: 0 to 18) and the rhinoconjunctivitis DMS (rhinitis DMS and conjunctivitis DMS; range: 0 to 20); the total possible TCS ranges from 0 to 38 points with higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity. The endpoint was calculated as the average daily diary entry score from the last 8 weeks of treatment. (NCT01700192)
Timeframe: Last 8 weeks of treatment (Weeks 44 to 52)

InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
MK-82376.40
Placebo7.62

[back to top]

Average Total Combined Rhinitis Score (TCRS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment

The TCRS is the sum of the rhinitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS; range: 0 to 12) and the rhinitis Daily Medication Score (DMS; range: 0 to 12); the total possible TCRS ranges from 0 to 24 points with higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity. The endpoint was calculated as the average daily diary entry score from the last 8 weeks of treatment. (NCT01700192)
Timeframe: Last 8 weeks of treatment (Weeks 44 to 52)

InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
MK-82374.67
Placebo5.49

[back to top]

Average Rhinitis Daily Symptom Score (Rhinitis DSS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment

The Rhinitis DSS ranges from a score of 0 to 12 (higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity). The endpoint was calculated as the average daily diary entry score from the last 8 weeks of treatment. (NCT01700192)
Timeframe: Last 8 weeks of treatment (Weeks 44 to 52)

InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
MK-82373.83
Placebo4.46

[back to top]

Average Rhinitis Daily Medication Score (Rhinitis DMS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment

The Rhinitis DMS ranges from a score of 0 to 12 (higher scores indicative of greater symptomatic medication use). The endpoint was calculated as the average daily diary entry score from the last 8 weeks of treatment. (NCT01700192)
Timeframe: Last 8 weeks of treatment (Weeks 44 to 52)

InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
MK-82370.84
Placebo1.03

[back to top]

Average Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptoms Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment

"Participants indicated the severity of symptoms in the past week on a VAS with a score range of 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (severe symptoms). Symptoms were assessed during 2 clinic visits occurring during the final 8 weeks of treatment (VAS score reflects the mean of 2 scores)." (NCT01700192)
Timeframe: Last 8 weeks of treatment (Weeks 44 to 52)

InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
MK-823742.29
Placebo47.96

[back to top]

Bilateral Polyp Grade

Polyps were graded by clinical investigators on a scale from 0 (no visible polyps) to 4 (nasal polyps completely obstructing nasal cavity) and then the left and right values were added to obtain a total bilateral polyp grade, ranging from 0 to 8. Negative values for change from baseline indicate reduction (improvement) in nasal polyps. (NCT01732536)
Timeframe: 90 days, 6 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline90 daysChange from baseline to 90 daysMonth 6Change from baseline to 6 months
Control4.324.24-0.094.360.02
S8 Sinus Implant4.683.65-1.043.96-0.71

[back to top]

Bilateral Polyp Grade

Polyp grade was determined by a panel of 3 independent sinus surgeons based on a centralized, blinded videoendoscopy review. Each sinus was graded from 0 (no visible polyps) to 4 (nasal polyps completely obstructing nasal cavity) and then the left and right values were added to obtain a total bilateral polyp grade, ranging from 0 to 8. Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in bilateral polyp grade. (NCT01732536)
Timeframe: 90 days

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 90Change from baseline
Control4.394.00-0.38
Treatment4.904.12-0.76

[back to top]

Ethmoid Sinus Obstruction

Percentage of the ethmoid sinus volume obstructed by scarring, polyps, or edema on endoscopy, as determined by a panel of 3 independent sinus surgeons based on a centralized, blinded videoendoscopy review using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (absence of obstruction) to 100 (complete obstruction). Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in ethmoid sinus obstruction. (NCT01732536)
Timeframe: 90 days

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 90Change from baseline
Control62.7457.17-5.57
S8 Sinus Implant70.5953.54-17.05

[back to top]

Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Score

NOSE scale is a validated symptom scoring instrument consisting of 5 questions each scored by patients on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not a problem) to 4 (severe problem), then multiplied by 5 and resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in NOSE score. (NCT01732536)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineMonth 6Change from baseline
Control63.1950.67-12.22
S8 Sinus Implant66.7941.83-25.58

[back to top]

Nasal Obstruction/Congestion Score

Nasal Obstruction by patients using a paper questionnaire on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in (NCT01732536)
Timeframe: 90 days

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 90Change from baseline
Control3.302.62-0.67
Treatment3.622.31-1.33

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Indicated for Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (RESS)

"To be indicated for RESS, the following criteria had to be met:~Continued to use topical intranasal steroids daily;~Continued to complain of at least 2 symptoms of chronic sinusitis despite ongoing topical intranasal steroid use~Needed or had received at least 1 course of aggressive steroid therapy or had refused such therapy due to intolerance/side effects; and~Had endoscopic evidence of persisting ethmoid sinus obstruction (bilateral polyp grade >=2 on at least one side)" (NCT01732536)
Timeframe: 90 days, 6 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineDay 90Month 6
Control473641
S8 Sinus Implant532536

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average AM/PM Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) Over Days 1 to 14.

"The Total Nasal Symptom Score Scale was used. Patients rated each of the following four symptoms on a scale from 0 to 3 : Nasal Congestion, Runny Nose, Sneezing, and Itchy Nose. Measurements were taken twice daily approximately 12 hours apart.~0= No symptom~Mild symptoms (sign/symptom present, minimal awareness, easily tolerated)~Moderate symptom (definite awareness of sign/symptom, bothersome but tolerable)~Severe symptom (sign/symptom hard to tolerate, causes interference with daily activities and/or sleeping)" (NCT01850823)
Timeframe: Twice daily from Baseline to 2 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
NASONEX® Nasal Spray (Schering Corporation)1.861
Mometasone Nasal Spray (Watson Laboratories, Inc)1.600

[back to top]

Superiority of Active Treatment Arms Over Placebo

"Superiority analysis of Change From Baseline in rTNSS for both active arms compared to placebo arm. The Total Nasal Symptom Score Scale was used. Patients rated each of the following four symptoms on a scale from 0 to 3: Nasal Congestion, Runny Nose, Sneezing, and Itchy Nose twice daily approximately 12 hours apart.~0= No symptom~Mild symptoms (sign/symptom present, minimal awareness, easily tolerated)~Moderate symptom (definite awareness of sign/symptom, bothersome but tolerable)~Severe symptom (sign/symptom hard to tolerate, causes interference with daily activities and/or sleeping)" (NCT01850823)
Timeframe: Twice daily from Baseline to 2 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.898
NASONEX® Nasal Spray (Schering Corporation)1.609
Mometasone Nasal Spray (Watson Laboratories, Inc)1.863

[back to top]

Difference Between Patient-reported Skin Toxicities at End of Radiation Therapy and 2 Week Follow-up

The Skindex-16 assessment tool is designed to capture patient-reported assessments of subjective adverse effects. It consists of a short 16-item assessment completed by the patient, with each item rated on a 7-point Likert scale (0=never bothered to 6=always bothered). Responses to the Skindex-16 are categorized into three subscales: symptom, emotional, and functional. Scores for the emotions, symptoms and functioning scales are also expressed in a linear scale from 0 to 100. Rankings of the questionnaire are then averaged to obtain a score of severity of patient-reported outcomes. This allows providers to gauge which aspects of the participant's experience are most affected by the treatment. (NCT01856543)
Timeframe: 2 weeks after end of Radiation Therapy

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Median)
EmotionsSymptomsFunctioning
Eucerin15.011.06.0
Mometasone Furoate 0.1%12.011.05.0

[back to top]

Difference From Baseline and 5 Weeks Between Patient-reported Skin Toxicities at Baseline and End of Radiation Treatment

The Skindex-16 assessment tool is designed to capture patient-reported assessments of subjective adverse effects. It consists of a short 16-item assessment completed by the patient, with each item rated on a 7-point Likert scale (0=never bothered to 6=always bothered). Responses to the Skindex-16 are categorized into three subscales: symptom, emotional, and functional. Scores for the emotions, symptoms and functioning scales are also expressed in a linear scale from 0 to 100. Rankings of the questionnaire are then averaged to obtain a score of severity of patient-reported outcomes. This allows providers to gauge which aspects of the participant's experience are most affected by the treatment. (NCT01856543)
Timeframe: 5 weeks and Baseline

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
EmotionsSymptomsFunctioning
Eucerin8.06.02.0
Mometasone Furoate 0.1%5.06.01.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Moist Desquamation

Skin toxicity assessments will be done on a weekly basis while the patient is receiving RT, by the RN or physician utilizing CTCAE 4.0 and the weekly status check form, as per current standard practice. (NCT01856543)
Timeframe: 2 years

Intervention% of participants w/moist desquamation (Number)
Eucerin66.7
Mometasone Furoate 0.1%43.8

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Plasma Mometasone Furoate Concentration >LLOQ

Concentration of mometasone furoate was determined in blood samples collected at baseline, Days 3, 7, 14, 21 and 30 using a validated method with the lowest level of quantification (LLOQ) of 30 pg/ml. (NCT01894503)
Timeframe: Days 3, 7, 14, 21 and 30

Interventionparticipants (Number)
BaselineDay 3Day 7Day 14Day 21Day 30
S8 Sinus Implant031200

[back to top]

Number of Sinuses With Successful Implant Delivery

Defined as successful access and deployment of the S8 Sinus Implant to the target ethmoid sinus at the end of the baseline procedure (NCT01894503)
Timeframe: End of baseline procedure

InterventionSinuses (Count of Units)
S8 Sinus Implant10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sinus Computed Tomography (CT) Scan Assessments at Week 16: Lund-Mackay Score

CT scan assessment included Lund-Mackay score and percent of the maxillary sinuses occupied by disease. The Lund-Mackay scoring system rated each of both the left and right frontal, maxillary, sphenoid, ostiomeatal complex, anterior ethmoid and posterior ethmoid sinuses. The total score ranges from 0 (normal) - 24 (more opacified); higher score indicated worse status. (NCT01920893)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.23
Dupilumab 300 mg QW-9.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Participant Reported Symptoms Scores of Sinusitis at Week 16

Morning symptoms of sinusitis (nasal congestion/obstruction, anterior rhinorrhea [runny nose], posterior rhinorrhea [post nasal drip], and loss of sense of smell) were assessed using a 0 (no symptoms) - 3 (severe symptoms) categorical scale where higher score indicated severe symptoms. (NCT01920893)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Congestion/obstructionRunny nosePost nasal dripLoss of sense of smell
Dupilumab 300 mg QW-0.95-0.62-0.49-1.36
Placebo-0.26-0.1-0.15-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sinus Computed Tomography (CT) Scan Assessments at Week 16: Percent Area Occupied by Disease

CT scan assessment included Lund-Mackay score and percentage of the area of maxillary sinuses occupied by disease. (NCT01920893)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

Interventionpercent area (Mean)
Placebo-3.92
Dupilumab 300 mg QW-35.66

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Nasal Total Symptoms Score (nTSS) at Week 16

nTSS was the sum of participant-assessed nasal symptom scores for nasal congestion/obstruction, decreased/loss of sense of smell, and rhinorrhea (anterior/posterior nasal discharge), each accessed on 0-3 categorical scale. Total score ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 9 (severe symptoms). Higher score indicated severe symptoms. (NCT01920893)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
nTSS - MorningnTSS - Evening
Dupilumab 300 mg QW-2.87-2.9
Placebo-0.68-0.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow (NPIF) at Week 16

NPIF evaluation represents a physiologic measure of the air flow through both nasal cavities during forced inspiration and/or expiration expressed in liter per minute. (NCT01920893)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

,
Interventionliter/minute (Mean)
NPIF-MorningNPIF-Evening
Dupilumab 300 mg QW61.9161.25
Placebo28.8126.65

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bilateral Endoscopic Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) at Week 16

NPS was the sum of the right and left nostril scores, as evaluated by means of nasal endoscopy. Total score ranges from 0 to 8 (scored 0 [no polyp] to 4 [large polyps] for each nostril), with a lower score indicating smaller-sized polyps. (NCT01920893)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 16Change from baseline at Week 16
Dupilumab 300 mg QW5.873.97-1.9
Placebo5.675.39-0.26

[back to top]

Time to First Response in NPS: Kaplan-Meier Estimate at Week 16

The time-to-first response in NPS: time from the date of randomization to the date of first NPS (defined as >=1 point reduction from baseline score); for participants without NPS >=1 point reduction, it was censored at the end of treatment date. The median time to first response was not estimated because the number of responses was too low in the Dupilumab arm. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of response at Week 16, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics. (NCT01920893)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

InterventionProbability of response (Number)
Placebo0.44
Dupilumab 300 mg QW0.828

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Rhinosinusitis Symptoms Severity at Week 16

Severity of rhinosinusitis symptoms were assessed on a 0 cm (not troublesome) - 10 cm (worst thinkable troublesome) VAS where higher score indicated worst thinkable troublesome. (NCT01920893)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

Interventioncentimetre (cm) (Mean)
Placebo-1.84
Dupilumab 300 mg QW-4.32

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Smell Test (University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test [UPSIT]) Scores at Week 16

UPSIT was a 40-item test to measure the individual's ability to detect odors. Total score ranges from 0 (anosmia)-40 (normal sense of smell), lower score indicated severe smell loss. (NCT01920893)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.17
Dupilumab 300 mg QW15.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 22-Item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) at Week 16

The SNOT-22 was a validated questionnaire to assess the impact of chronic rhinosinusitis on quality of life. The total score may range from 0 (no problem)-110 (worst quality of life), higher scores represented worst quality of life; minimal clinically important change ≥ 8.90. (NCT01920893)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-8.26
Dupilumab 300 mg QW-29.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bilateral Endoscopic NPS at Week 16 in Participants With Asthma

NPS was the sum of the right and left nostril scores, as evaluated by means of nasal endoscopy. Total score ranges from 0 to 8 (scored 0 [no polyp] to 4 [large polyps] for each nostril), with a lower score indicating smaller-sized polyps. (NCT01920893)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.27
Dupilumab 300 mg QW-2.4

[back to top]

Overall Adherence to Dulera 100/5 and 200/5

"Subjects in the monitoring group will have adherence greater than or equal to the 60% benchmark~Overall interval value was the mean of daily percent" (NCT02045875)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercent of prescribed doses per day (Mean)
Dulera Adherence Monitoring80.95

[back to top]

Adherence to Dulera 100/5 and 200/5

"Subjects in the monitoring group will have adherence greater than or equal to the 60% benchmark~Adherence was calculated by taking the number of doses actually taken divided by the number of doses prescribed and multiplying by 100." (NCT02045875)
Timeframe: week 2. months 1, 2, and 3

Interventionpercent of prescribed doses (Mean)
week 2month 1month 2month 3
Dulera Adherence Monitoring88.7580.777.5576.8

[back to top]

Asthma Control

Asthma Control Questionnaire measured at each office visit. ACQ integrates values by 6 clinical questions related to symptoms and the value related to FEV1% predicted with a total score ranging from 0-6 and higher values indicating poorer asthma control. (NCT02045875)
Timeframe: Baseline, one, two and three months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
baselineone monthtwo monththree month
Dulera Adherence Monitoring1.8571.7921.3451.105
Dulera Standard of Asthma Care1.5921.5781.4881.407

[back to top]

Change in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain

Mean change in patient reported pain NRS score, full scale range 0- 10, higher score indicate more pain (NCT02061202)
Timeframe: baseline and 20 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate2.09
Placebo2.82

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Completed Follow up

Feasibility is determined by calculating the proportion of randomized participants who complete follow up and a minimum of 30 pain diaries with good adherence to the study medication vs. the number enrolled. (NCT02061202)
Timeframe: at 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Mometasone Furoate35
Placebo17

[back to top]

Asthma Control Test

Asthma control test, total score from 0-25, with higher score indicating more symptoms (NCT02061202)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate17.7
Placebo17.1

[back to top]

Change in Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-Me)

Mean changes in ASCQ-Me (NHLBI developed a patient-reported Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) quality of life measurement tool) pain impact, at week 20 as compared to baseline. A reduction change on a 100-point scale indicated improved quality of life. ASCQ-Me uses a T-score metric (0-100) in which 50 is the mean of the reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. (NCT02061202)
Timeframe: baseline and week 20

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate2.8
Placebo6.9

[back to top]

Change in Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO)

Change in effects of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as measured by exhaled nitric oxide levels, which is the primary marker of pulmonary inflammation. (NCT02061202)
Timeframe: Before ICS therapy begins and at 8 weeks post enrollment

Interventionppb (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate0.63
Placebo2.71

[back to top]

Change in FEV1/FVC

Mean change in FEV1/FVC at 8 weeks compared to baseline (NCT02061202)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 weeks

Interventionratio (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate-0.71
Placebo-1.41

[back to top]

Change in Reticulocytes Count

Mean change in reticulocytes count - the number of new red blood cells. (NCT02061202)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 weeks

Intervention10^3 cells/μL (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate-0.15
Placebo0.07

[back to top]

Change in Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (sVCAM) Level

Mean Change in effects of inhaled corticosteroids vascular injury, assessed by biomarker sVCAM as a surrogate for vascular injury. (NCT02061202)
Timeframe: Before ICS therapy begins and at 8 weeks post enrollment

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate-182.47
Placebo170.25

[back to top]

The Medication Adherence Report Scale

The medication adherence report scale for asthma is a 10 question tool scored between 0 and 5, with full scale from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating greater adherence (NCT02061202)
Timeframe: 20 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate17.7
Placebo17.1

[back to top]

Admissions or Visits to the Hospital

Number of times participant visited the Emergency Department (ED) or was admitted to the hospital (NCT02061202)
Timeframe: baseline through 8 weeks

,
InterventionEvents (Mean)
ED visitsObservation admitsAdmissions
Mometasone Furoate0.970.370.37
Placebo1.120.590.47

[back to top]

Peak Expiratory Flow Rate

Peak expiratory flow rate is a person's maximum speed of expiration. It measures the airflow through the bronchi and thus the degree of obstruction in the airways. (NCT02066298)
Timeframe: End of 12-week treatment period

Interventionliters per minute (Mean)
Placebo476
Mometasone 220mcg BID485
Tiotropium Respimat 5mcg QD497

[back to top]

Treatment Failure

"Treatment Failure includes:~Awakening from asthma three or more times in a two-week period or on two consecutive nights, or~Using albuterol for relief of symptoms four or more times/day for two or more consecutive days, or~Albuterol has been relieving symptoms for less than four hours after each treatment over a 12-hour period, or~Using albuterol for relief of symptoms daily for seven days, and this use exceeds two times the weekly use of albuterol in the baseline period, or~exercise induces unusual breathlessness" (NCT02066298)
Timeframe: End of 12-week treatment period

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo29
Mometasone 220mcg BID29
Tiotropium Respimat 5mcg QD35

[back to top]

Pairwise Comparison of Treatments Based on Composite Measure Using Treatment Failures, Asthma Control Days, and Percent Predicted FEV1.

This composite outcome uses a hierarchical method to ascertain differences in asthma control. For each participant, treatments are first compared to see if they differ in terms of treatment failures. If one treatment results in no treatment failures and another treatment does, it is deemed the superior treatment and no further comparisons are made. If treatment superiority cannot be assigned by treatment failures, then they are compared by asthma control days (ACDs). If one treatment yields at least 31 annualized ACDs more than another, it is deemed the superior treatment. If treatment superiority still cannot be assigned by ACDs, then they are compared by percent predicted FEV1 at the end of a treatment period. If one treatment yields at least 5% greater FEV1 than another, it is deemed the superior treatment. If treatment superiority cannot be assigned by exacerbations, ACDs or FEV1, then that participant is classified as having no differential response. (NCT02066298)
Timeframe: End of 12-week treatment period

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Mometesone superior to placeboPlacebo superior to mometasoneMometesone equal to placeboTiotropium superior to placeboPlacebo superior to tiotropiumTiotropium equal to placebo
Eosinophil High351220251918
Eosinophil Low745646805249

[back to top]

Asthma Exacerbations

"Asthma exacerbations are more severe episodes of acute worsening, defined by meeting one or more of the following:~FEV1 <50% of baseline on 2 consecutive measurements~FEV1 <40% of predicted on 2 consecutive measurements~Use of ≥ 16 puffs of as needed β-agonist per 24 hours for a period of 48 hours~Use of oral/parenteral corticosteroid due to asthma" (NCT02066298)
Timeframe: End of 12-week treatment period

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo1
Mometasone 220mcg BID3
Tiotropium Respimat 5mcg QD5

[back to top]

Annualized Asthma Control Days

Asthma Control Days (ACD) are based on patient completed electronic daily diaries, and are defined as: A day with no rescue albuterol use (pre-exercise albuterol will not be counted), no non-study asthma medications, no daytime asthma symptoms (shortness of breath, wheezing, chest tightness, phlegm/mucus rated as mild, moderate or severe, or cough rated as moderate or severe), no nighttime asthma symptoms, no unscheduled healthcare visits for asthma, and no PEF < 80% of predetermined baseline. Annualized ACD are calculated as the proportion of ACD during the treatment period multiplied by 365. (NCT02066298)
Timeframe: End of 12-week treatment period

Interventiondays (Mean)
Placebo179
Mometasone 220mcg BID186
Tiotropium Respimat 5mcg QD176

[back to top]

Forced Expiratory Volume at One Second (FEV1) Percent of Predicted

FEV1, expressed as percent of predicted FEV1 based on age, sex, race, and height. (NCT02066298)
Timeframe: End of 12-week treatment period

Interventionpercentage of predicted FEV1 (Mean)
Eosinophil Low - Placebo92
Mometasone 220mcg BID94
Tiotropium Respimat 5mcg QD95

[back to top]

Ostial Patency

Ostial patency grading scale from 0 (patent) to 1 (Occluded/Restenosed) (NCT02228720)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90

Interventionpercentage of evaluable sinuses (Number)
Baseline - Frontal SinusesDay 30 - Frontal SinusesDay 90 - Frontal SinusesBaseline - Maxillary SinusesDay 30 - Maxillary SinusesDay 90 - Maxillary Sinuses
Propel Nova Sinus Implant33.310088.257.110094.1

[back to top]

Device Placement Success Rate

Defined as successful access to and placement of the Propel Nova Sinus Implant in the frontal or maxillary sinus ostium within two attempts. Calculated as a proportion where the numerator is the number of successful device placements and the denominator is the number of attempted sinuses. (NCT02228720)
Timeframe: Baseline Procedure

InterventionPercentage of attempted sinuses (Number)
Frontal SinusesMaxillary Sinuses
Propel Nova Sinus Implant10095.2

[back to top]

Degree of Inflammation

Inflammation visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (no visible inflammation) to 100 (severe inflammation, involving significant and extensive erythema and edema and/or hypertrophy and/or polypoid changes) (NCT02228720)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline - Frontal SinusesDay 30 - Frontal SinusesDay 90 - Frontal SinusesBaseline - Maxillary SinusesDay 30 - Maxillary SinusesDay 90 - Maxillary Sinuses
Propel Nova Sinus Implant62.828.125.051.622.214.1

[back to top]

Adhesion/Scarring Grade 2 & 3

Adhesion/scarring grading scale from 0 (No visible granulation/scarring), 1 (Minimal amount of scarring/contraction observed but non-obstructing the frontal or maxillary sinus ostium), 2 (moderate amount of obstructive scar tissue/contraction present in the frontal or maxillary sinus ostium), 3 (Significant scar tissue/ contraction causing obstruction of the frontal or maxillary sinus ostium) (NCT02228720)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90

Interventionpercentage of evaluable sinuses (Number)
Baseline - Frontal SinusesDay 30 - Frontal SinusesDay 90 - Frontal SinusesBaseline - Maxillary SinusesDay 30 - Maxillary SinusesDay 90 - Maxillary Sinuses
Propel Nova Sinus Implant33.44.511.819.105.3

[back to top]

Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT) 22

Validated, disease-specific, symptom-scoring instrument consisting of 22 questions, each scored by the patient on a scale of 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be), resulting in a maximum total score of 110 (NCT02228720)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 30Day 90
Propel Nova Sinus Implant42.621.520.6

[back to top]

Percent of Sinuses That Require Post-operative Interventions (Propel Nova Cohort)

"The reduction in need for post-operative interventions at Day 30, as determined by an independent blinded sinus surgeon based on video-endoscopy reviews.~Need for Post-Operative Intervention is a composite endpoint that includes: surgical intervention required to debride obstructive adhesions or scar tissue formation in the Frontal sinus opening(defined as grade 2 or 3 on the adhesion/scarring scale), and/or oral steroid intervention warranted to resolve recurrent inflammation and polypoid edema in the frontal recess/FSO (Yes/No response)." (NCT02266810)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionpercentage sinus requiring intervention (Number)
PROPEL Nova Sinus Implant11.5
Sinus Surgery Only: Cohort 232.8

[back to top]

Occlusion/Restenosis (Propel Mini Cohort)

"Patency of the FSO was assessed by clinical investigators endoscopically on a 3-point grading scale as follows:~0=Patent~Restenosed/Partially Occluded~Occluded" (NCT02266810)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionpercentage of evaluable sinuses (Number)
PROPEL Mini Sinus Implant21.1
Sinus Surgery Only: Cohort 146.1

[back to top]

Need for Surgical Interventions (Propel Nova Cohort)

"Need for Surgical Interventions by clinical investigators at Day 30~Need for Surgical Interventions by clinical investigators at Day 30.~Need for surgical interventions was prospectively defined as Adhesion/scarring grades of 2 and 3.~Adhesions/Scarring was assessed based on a 4-point scale as follows:~0= No visible granulation/scarring in the FSO~Minimal amount of granulation, scarring or contraction observed but not obstructing the FSO (intervention not warranted)~Moderate amount of obstructive granulation, scarring or contraction present in the FSO (intervention is warranted)~Significant amount of scarring or contraction causing obstruction of the FSO requiring intervention (likely to compromise patency if not removed)" (NCT02266810)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionpercentage of evaluable sinuses (Number)
PROPEL Nova Sinus Implant4.0
Sinus Surgery Only: Cohort 214.7

[back to top]

Need for Surgical Interventions (Propel Mini Cohort)

"Need for Surgical Interventions by clinical investigators at Day 30.~Need for surgical interventions was prospectively defined as Adhesion/scarring grades of 2 and 3.~Adhesions/Scarring was assessed based on a 4-point scale as follows:~0= No visible granulation/scarring in the FSO~Minimal amount of granulation, scarring or contraction observed but not obstructing the FSO (intervention not warranted)~Moderate amount of obstructive granulation, scarring or contraction present in the FSO (intervention is warranted)~Significant amount of scarring or contraction causing obstruction of the FSO requiring intervention (likely to compromise patency if not removed)" (NCT02266810)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionpercentage of evaluable sinuses (Number)
PROPEL Mini Sinus Implant4.0
Sinus Surgery Only: Cohort 116.0

[back to top]

Occlusion/Restenosis (Propel Nova Cohort)

"Patency of the FSO was assessed by clinical investigators endoscopically on a 3-point grading scale as follows:~0=Patent~Restenosed/Partially Occluded~Occluded" (NCT02266810)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionpercentage of evaluable sinuses (Number)
PROPEL Nova Sinus Implant13.3
Sinus Surgery Only: Cohort 236.0

[back to top]

Percent of Sinuses That Require Post-operative Interventions (Propel Mini Cohort)

"The reduction in need for post-operative interventions at Day 30, as determined by an independent blinded sinus surgeon based on video-endoscopy reviews.~Need for Post-Operative Intervention is a composite endpoint that includes: surgical intervention required to debride obstructive adhesions or scar tissue formation in the Frontal sinus opening(defined as grade 2 or 3 on the adhesion/scarring scale), and/or oral steroid intervention warranted to resolve recurrent inflammation and polypoid edema in the frontal recess/FSO (Yes/No response)." (NCT02266810)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionpercent sinuses requiring intervention (Number)
PROPEL Mini Sinus Implant38.8
Sinus Surgery Only: Cohort 162.7

[back to top]

Need for Post-operative Interventions (Propel Nova Cohort)

"Need for post-operative interventions by clinical investigators at Day 30.~Need for Post-Operative Intervention is a composite endpoint that includes: surgical intervention required to debride obstructive adhesions or scar tissue formation in the FSO (defined as grade 2 or 3 on the adhesion/scarring scale by investigators), and/or oral steroid intervention warranted to resolve recurrent inflammation and polypoid edema in the frontal recess/FSO (Yes/No response)." (NCT02266810)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionpercentage of evaluable sinuses (Number)
PROPEL Nova Sinus Implant16.0
Sinus Surgery Only: Cohort 233.3

[back to top]

Inflammation (Propel Mini Cohort)

The degree of inflammation present in the frontal recess/FSO was evaluated by clinical investigators using a 100-mm VAS ranging from 0 defined as no visible inflammation to 100 defined as severe inflammation, involving extensive erythema, edema, or polyposis. (NCT02266810)
Timeframe: Day 30

Intervention100-mm VAS (Mean)
PROPEL Mini Sinus Implant24.7
Sinus Surgery Alone: Cohort 141.3

[back to top]

Need for Post-operative Interventions (Propel Mini Cohort)

"Need for post-operative interventions by clinical investigators at Day 30~Need for Post-Operative Intervention is a composite endpoint that includes: surgical intervention required to debride obstructive adhesions or scar tissue formation in the FSO (defined as grade 2 or 3 on the adhesion/scarring scale), and/or oral steroid intervention warranted to resolve recurrent inflammation and polypoid edema in the frontal recess/FSO (Yes/No response)." (NCT02266810)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionpercentage of evaluable sinuses (Number)
PROPEL Mini Sinus Implant16.5
Sinus Surgery Only: Cohort 141.8

[back to top]

Inflammation (Propel Nova Cohort)

The degree of inflammation present in the frontal recess/FSO was evaluated by clinical investigators using a 100-mm VAS ranging from 0 defined as no visible inflammation to 100 defined as severe inflammation, involving extensive erythema, edema, or polyposis. (NCT02266810)
Timeframe: Day 30

Intervention100-mm VAS (Mean)
PROPEL Nova Sinus Implant23.1
Sinus Surgery Alone: Cohort 235.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Indicated for Repeat Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (RESS)

Proportion of patients still indicated for RESS at day 90 despite ongoing use of mometasone furoate nasal spray based on clinical investigator assessment using study-specific criteria. To be indicated for RESS, patients had to: (1) complain of nasal obstruction/congestion (moderate to severe) and postnasal discharge, facial pain/pressure/fullness, or altered sense of smell/taste; (2) have endoscopic evidence of persisting nasal polyps (grade >= 2 on each side); and (3) have received (required at baseline) or need a systemic steroid as noted during endoscopy. (NCT02291549)
Timeframe: Day 90

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineDay 90
Control9962
Treatment20178

[back to top]

Nasal Obstruction/Congestion Score

Determined by patients using a daily diary on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) over a period of 7 days prior to the baseline and Day 30 visits. Negative values for change from baseline indicate reduction (improvement) in nasal obstruction/congestion symptoms. (NCT02291549)
Timeframe: Day 30

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline30 DayChange from baseline
Control2.351.79-0.56
Treatment2.361.56-0.80

[back to top]

Bilateral Polyp Grade

Polyp grade was determined by an independent panel of 3 sinus surgeons based on a centralized, blinded videoendoscopy review. Each sinus was graded from 0 (no visible polyps) to 4 (nasal polyps completely obstructing nasal cavity) and then the left and right values were added to obtain a total bilateral polyp grade, ranging from 0 to 8. Negative values for change from baseline indicated reduction (improvement) in bilateral polyp grade. (NCT02291549)
Timeframe: Day 90

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 90Change from baseline
Control5.435.26-0.15
Treatment5.484.91-0.56

[back to top]

Ethmoid Sinus Obstruction

Percentage of the ethmoid sinus volume obstructed by scarring, polyps, or edema on endoscopy, as determined by an independent panel of 3 sinus surgeons based on a centralized, blinded videoendoscopy review using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (absence of obstruction) to 100 (complete obstruction). Negative values for change from baseline indicated reduction (improvement) in ethmoid sinus obstruction. (NCT02291549)
Timeframe: Day 90

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 90Change from baseline
Control67.064.8-1.9
Treatment69.257.7-11.3

[back to top]

Decreased Sense of Smell Score

Determined by patients on a 6-point Likert scale from 0 (absent) to 5 (very severe). Negative values for change from baseline indicated reduction (improvement) in sense of smell. (NCT02291549)
Timeframe: Day 90

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 90Change from baseline
Control4.13.4-0.76
Treatment4.12.9-1.20

[back to top]

Facial Pain/Pressure Score

Determined by patients on a 6-point Likert scale from 0 (absent) to 5 (very severe). Negative values for change from baseline indicated reduction (improvement) in facial pain/pressure symptoms. (NCT02291549)
Timeframe: Day 90

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 90Change from baseline
Control2.21.2-0.90
Treatment1.91.1-0.77

[back to top]

Nasal Obstruction/Congestion Score

Determined by patients using a daily diary on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) over a period of 7 days prior to baseline and Day 90. Negative values for change from baseline indicated reduction (improvement) in nasal obstruction/congestion symptoms. (NCT02291549)
Timeframe: Day 90

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 90Change from baseline
Control2.351.68-0.69
Treatment2.361.42-0.93

[back to top]

Change in rTNSS From Baseline to End of Treatment

"Subjects were asked to assess rTNSS (reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score), ie, an evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours prior to the recording of the score. The TNSS was defined as the sum of the subject-reported symptom severity scores for the following four nasal symptoms, recorded by each subject in the diary: rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching.~The total rTNSS scores for all four symptoms (i.e, the lowest possible score (0) and the highest possible score (12).) Higher score means a worse outcome.~The severity scale for each symptom evaluation was defined as follows:~0 = absent (no sign/symptom evident)~1 = mild (sign/symptom clearly present, but minimal awareness; easily tolerated)~2 = moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable)~3 = severe (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate [i.e., causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping])" (NCT02318303)
Timeframe: 14 days

,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Visit 4
GSP 301 Placebo10.3-1.4
GSP 301-1 NS (QD)10.4-2.5
GSP 301-2 NS (BID)10.4-2.6
Mometasone Furoate-1 NS (QD)10.4-2.2
Mometasone Furoate-2 NS (BID)10.5-1.9
Olopatadine HCl-1 NS (QD)10.3-1.7
Olopatadine HCl-2 NS (BID)10.3-2.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Anaphylaxis and/or Systemic Allergic Reactions

For the purposes of this study, systemic allergic reactions are allergic reactions that occur away from the site of study drug application (allergic reactions other than local application site reactions). Anaphylaxis is a severe allergic reaction that typically involves more than one body system. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: Up to 35 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Short Ragweed Pollen Allergen Extract0.58
Placebo0.20

[back to top]

Average TCS During the Entire RS

TCS is DSS plus DMS, assessed here during the entire RS. This starts from the first day of 3 consecutive days with ragweed pollen counts ≥10 grains/m^3 through the last day of the last occurrence of 3 consecutive days with ragweed pollen counts ≥10 grains/m^3. The duration of the entire RS is up to 13 weeks; this duration varies by site/region. The RC DSS assesses 6 allergy symptoms measured on a scale of 0 to 3 (score range: 0-18). A lower DSS indicates less RC symptoms. The RC DMS is based on use of RC rescue medications (loratadine, olopatadine, mometasone) with different scores/dose unit (score range: 0-20). A lower DMS indicates less RC medication use. The sum of RC DSS+DMS ranges from 0 to 38, with a lower score indicating less RC symptoms and medication use. Components contributing to the TCS for the entire RS are collected in an e-diary completed by the participant/parent/guardian. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: Up to 13 weeks

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Short Ragweed Pollen Allergen Extract3.88
Placebo5.75

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Pre-specified Local Application Site Reactions

Pre-specified local application site reactions, irrespective of causality, included AEs related to lip swelling/edema, mouth swelling/edema, palatal swelling/edema, swollen tongue/edema, oropharyngeal swelling/edema, pharyngeal edema/throat tightness, oral pruritus, throat irritation, tongue pruritus, and ear pruritus. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: Up to 35 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Short Ragween Pollen Allergen Extract64.52
Placebo26.92

[back to top]

Average Rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DMS During the Peak RS

This DMS endpoint consists of a total of scores for use of RC medications: loratadine syrup or tablets (6 points), olopatadine (6 points), and mometasone (8 points). The score range of the RC DMS is 0-20 points, and a lower DMS means that less medication is used. The method used for analysis of the RC DMS is a zero-inflated log-normal model, which takes the average RC DMS during the peak RS as the response and adjusts for the same terms as in the ANOVA model. The components that contribute to the DMS endpoint are collected in an e-diary completed by the participant/parent/guardian. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: The 15-day period during the ragweed season with the highest moving pollen average

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Short Ragweed Pollen Allergen Extract2.01
Placebo3.85

[back to top]

Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Peak Ragweed Season (RS)

TCS is daily symptom score (DSS) plus daily medication score (DMS), assessed in the peak RS (15 consecutive RS days with the highest 15-day average pollen count). The rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DSS assesses 6 allergy symptoms measured on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=no symptoms, 3=severe symptoms; score range: 0-18). Lower DSS indicates less RC symptoms. The RC DMS is based on use of RC rescue medications (loratadine, olopatadine, mometasone), with different rescue medications being assigned different scores/dose unit (score range: 0-20). Lower DMS indicates less RC medication use. Summed RC DSS+DMS could range from 0 to 38; a lower score indicates less RC symptoms and medication use. Components that contribute to DSS and DMS endpoints are collected in an electronic diary (e-diary) completed by the participant/parent/guardian. Evaluation is based on average TCS during peak RS. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: The 15-day period during the ragweed season with the highest moving pollen average

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Short Ragweed Pollen Allergen Extract4.39
Placebo7.12

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Treated With Epinephrine

Self-injectable epinephrine was provided to each participant/parent/guardian at randomization in countries where it is a regulatory requirement, and was to be available around the time treatment is administered at home. Self-injectable epinephrine was intended for immediate self-administration for an anaphylactic reaction, including symptoms/signs of upper airway obstruction. Instances of treatment with forms of epinephrine other than systemic epinephrine (e.g., inhaled racepinephrine) were counted as use of epinephrine. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: Up to 35 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Short Ragween Pollen Allergen Extract0.19
Placebo0.20

[back to top]

Average Rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DSS During the Peak RS

The DSS consists of a total of 6 rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms: 4 rhinitis symptoms (runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing, itchy nose) and 2 conjunctivitis symptoms (itchy eyes, watery eyes). The components that contribute to the DSS endpoint are collected in an e-diary completed by the participant/parent/guardian. The RC DSS is measured on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 as follows: 0 (no sign/symptom evident) to 3 (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate; may cause interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping). The maximum DSS is 18 points if a participant experiences all 6 symptoms with an intensity of 3 for each symptom. The minimum DSS is 0 points if a participant experiences no symptoms. A lower DSS means symptoms are less severe. The evaluation is based on the average DSS during the peak RS. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: The 15-day period during the ragweed season with the highest moving pollen average

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Short Ragweed Pollen Allergen Extract2.55
Placebo3.95

[back to top]

Post Dose FEV1 (5 Minutes-1 Hour)

Post-dose FEV1 measurements were analyzed at 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes and 1 hour. FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured through spirometry testing. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52 (Day 364)

,,,,
InterventionL (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1: 5 minutesDay 1: 15 minutesDay 1: 30 minutesDay 1: 1 hourDay 30: 5 minutesDay 30: 30 minutesDay 30: 1 hourDay 86:5 minutesDay 86: 30 minutesDay 86:1 hourDay 183: 5 minutesDay 183: 30 minutesDay 183: 1 hourDay 364: 5 minutesDay 364: 30 minutesDay 364:1 hour
MF 400 μg2.1182.1372.1412.1422.1742.1742.1832.1782.1792.1882.1632.1682.1652.1302.1352.128
MF 800 μg2.1382.1592.1622.1662.2242.2382.2572.2482.2572.2692.2402.2502.2532.2452.2532.251
QMF149 150/160 μg2.2702.3122.3262.3472.4062.4262.4402.4092.4312.4362.4062.4272.4232.3792.3992.390
QMF149 150/320 μg2.2792.3212.3382.3432.4132.4322.4482.4112.4362.4562.4032.4262.4322.3842.4082.414
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg2.2242.2782.3102.3372.3602.3892.4112.3562.3982.4132.3592.3862.3932.3582.3772.383

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Asthma Exacerbation by Exacerbation Category

The exacerbation categories were: All (mild, moderate and severe) and combination of moderate or severe and severe. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Moderate or severe asthma exacerbationSevere asthma exacerbationModerate asthma exacerbationMild asthma exacerbationAll (mild, moderate, severe) asthma exacerbation
MF 400 μg32.520.116.519.644.5
MF 800 μg26.114.514.317.536.1
QMF149 150/160 μg16.99.88.212.125.6
QMF149 150/320 μg14.98.17.713.325.5
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg19.111.99.215.130.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence (i.e., any unfavorable and unintended sign including abnormal laboratory findings, symptom or disease) in a participant or clinical investigation participant after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. An SAE is defined as any adverse event (appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable sign(s), symptom(s) or medical conditions(s) which meets any one of the following criteria: is fatal or life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or is medically significant, i.e. defined as an event that jeopardizes the participants or may require medical or surgical intervention. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Approximately up to 56 weeks

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Adverse Events(AEs)Serious Adverse Events(SAEs)
MF 400 μg72.27.0
MF 800 μg70.04.8
QMF149 150/160 μg66.84.6
QMF149 150/320 μg64.64.7
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg65.34.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving the Minimal Important Difference (MID) ACQ ≥ 0.5 at Weeks 26 and 52

Change from baseline in ACQ-7 scores of ≤ 0.5 was defined as minimal clinically important difference and were considered clinically meaningful. The ACQ-7 measured asthma symptom control and consists of 7 items: 5 on symptom assessment, 1 on rescue bronchodilator use and 1 on airway calibre (FEV1 % predicted). All 7 questions of the ACQ-7 were equally weighted. Items 1-5 were scored along a 7-point response scale, where 0 = totally controlled and 6 = severely uncontrolled. Item 6 is scored between 0 = no rescue medication and 6 = More than 16 puffs/inhalations most days. The 7th item was scored by the investigator based on the FEV1 % predicted from the masterscope at the site (i.e., Score = 0 means > 95% of predicted FEV1, 1 = 90 - 95%, 2 = 80 - 89%, 3 = 70 - 79%, 4 = 60 - 69%, 5 = 50 - 59%, and Score = 6 means < 50% of predicted FEV1). The total score was calculated as the mean of all questions (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Weeks 26 (Day 183) and 52 (Day 364)

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 183Day 364
MF 400 μg66.969.2
MF 800 μg72.373.6
QMF149 150/160 μg76.282.1
QMF149 150/320 μg76.477.7
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg75.977.3

[back to top]

Change Form Baseline in Percentage of Days With no Daytime Symptoms

All participants were provided with an electronic diary (e-Diary) to record clinical symptoms. They were instructed to routinely complete the e-Diary twice daily at the same time each morning and again approximately 12 hours later in the evening. The e-Diary was reviewed at each visit until study completion. For days with no daytime symptoms, all 5 evening questions must have a score = 0 with respect to shortness of breath, wheeze, cough, chest tightness and impact on usual daily activities due to symptoms, each with scores from 0 (no problems) to 4 (very severe problems). (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 150/320 μg28.0
QMF149 150/160 μg28.0
MF 800 μg23.0
MF 400 μg20.0
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg24.8

[back to top]

Change Form Baseline in Percentage of Mornings With no Symptoms on Awakening

"All participants were provided with an electronic diary (e-Diary) to record clinical symptoms. They were instructed to routinely complete the e-Diary twice daily at the same time each morning and again approximately 12 hours later in the evening. The e-Diary was reviewed at each visit until study completion. The question asked for mornings with no symptoms on awakening was Did you have asthma symptoms upon awakening in the morning? to be answered with None with scores from 0 (no problem)-4 (very severe problems)." (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of mornings (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 150/320 μg25.5
QMF149 150/160 μg22.9
MF 800 μg19.1
MF 400 μg14.1
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg20.7

[back to top]

Duration in Days of Asthma Exacerbations by Exacerbation Category

The exacerbation categories were: All (mild, moderate and severe) and combination of moderate or severe and severe. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,,,,
Interventiondays (Mean)
Moderate or severe asthma exacerbationSevere asthma exacerbationAll(mild, moderate,severe) asthma exacerbation
MF 400 μg5.83.210.1
MF 800 μg3.71.76.9
QMF149 150/160 μg3.01.75.0
QMF149 150/320 μg2.61.35.4
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg3.11.95.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEF) Over 26 and 52 Weeks of Treatment

PEF is a person's maximum speed of expiration. All the participants were instructed to record PEF twice daily using a mini Peak Flow Meter device, once in the morning (before taking the morning dose) and once approximately 12 h later in the evening (before taking the evening dose). At each timepoint, the participant was instructed to perform 3 consecutive manoeuvres within 10 minutes. These PEF values were captured in the e-PEF/diary. The best of 3 values were used. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Weeks 26 and 52

,,,,
InterventionL/min (Least Squares Mean)
Week 26: Mean morning PEFWeek 26:Mean evening PEFWeek 52:Mean morning PEFWeek 52:Mean evening PEF
MF 400 μg5.90.06.7-0.3
MF 800 μg12.87.713.47.4
QMF149 150/160 μg38.130.436.928.7
QMF149 150/320 μg42.432.542.131.2
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg29.123.928.322.1

[back to top]

Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)

"AQLQ is a 32-item disease specific questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to patients with asthma, with a recall time of two weeks and each question to be answered on a 7-point scale (1-totally limited/problems all the time, 7-not at all limited/no problems). It consists of 4 domains:~Symptoms = Mean of Items 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 29, 30 (12 items)~Activity limitation = Mean of Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 11, 19, 25, 28, 31, 32 (11 items)~Emotional function = Mean of Items 7, 13, 15, 21, 27 (5 items)~Environmental stimuli = Mean of Items 9, 17, 23, 26 (4 items)~Overall Score = Mean of Items 1 to 32 (32 items)" (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52 (Day 364)

,,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Day 30Day 86Day 183Day 254Day 364
MF 400 μg5.3745.5105.5815.6145.641
MF 800 μg5.4135.5645.5985.6895.705
QMF149 150/160 μg5.4985.6295.7385.7815.832
QMF149 150/320 μg5.5605.6185.7245.7615.783
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg5.5155.5925.6395.7005.742

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Asthma Symptoms Free Days

All participants were provided with an electronic diary (e-Diary) to record clinical symptoms. They were instructed to routinely complete the e-Diary twice daily at the same time each morning and again approximately 12 hours later in the evening. The e-Diary was reviewed at each visit until study completion. Asthma symptoms free days are days with no daytime symptoms, no night-time awakenings and no symptoms on awakening. The daytime asthma symptom score was based on the daily e-diary recordings by participants with respect to shortness of breath, wheeze, cough, chest tightness, and impact on usual daily activities due to symptoms. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 150/320 μg28.3
QMF149 150/160 μg28.4
MF 800 μg22.5
MF 400 μg19.3
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg24.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Nights With no Night-time Awakenings

"All participants were provided with an electronic diary (e-Diary) to record clinical symptoms. They were instructed to routinely complete the e-Diary twice daily at the same time each morning and again approximately 12 hours later in the evening. The e-Diary was reviewed at each visit until study completion. The question asked for nights with no night-time awakenings was How did you sleep last night? had to be answered with I did not wake up because of any breathing problems with scores from 0 (no problem)-4 (very severe problems)." (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of nights (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 150/320 μg17.0
QMF149 150/160 μg16.4
MF 800 μg14.2
MF 400 μg12.5
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg16.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Due to Asthma Exacerbations

(NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
QMF149 150/320 μg0.2
QMF149 150/160 μg0
MF 800 μg0.9
MF 400 μg1.6
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg0.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Composite Endpoint of Serious Asthma Outcomes

A composite endpoint of serious asthma outcomes is defined as asthma-related hospitalization, asthma-related intubation, or asthma-related death and was reviewed by the Adjudication Committee. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
QMF149 150/320 μg0.7
QMF149 150/160 μg0.5
MF 800 μg1.6
MF 400 μg1.8
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg0.5

[back to top]

Time in Days to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Medication Due to Asthma Exacerbations

The exacerbation categories were: All (mild, moderate and severe) and combination of moderate or severe and severe. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

Interventiondays (Median)
QMF149 150/320 μg367.0
QMF149 150/160 μg367.0
MF 800 μg367.0
MF 400 μg366.0
Salmeterol /Fluticasone 50/500 μg367.0

[back to top]

Time to First Hospitalization for Asthma Exacerbation

The exacerbation categories were: All (mild, moderate and severe) and combination of moderate or severe and severe. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

Interventiondays (Median)
QMF149 150/320 μg367.0
QMF149 150/160 μg367.0
MF 800 μg367.0
MF 400 μg366.0
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg367.0

[back to top]

Total Amounts of Systemic Corticosteroids (in Doses) Used to Treat Asthma Exacerbations

The treatment of asthma exacerbations including the initiation of systemic corticosteroids were done according to investigator's or treating physician's medical judgement and in line with national and international recommendations. If systemic corticosteroids were required, a participant could return to the study after successfully completing a taper of approximately 7-10 days. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

Interventionmilligrams (Mean)
QMF149 150/320 μg26.0
QMF149 150/160 μg29.9
MF 800 μg28.0
MF 400 μg47.8
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg26.9

[back to top]

Trough FEV1 at Week 52

Trough FEV1 was assessed by performing spirometric assessment. It is defined as average of the two FEV1 measurements taken 23 hr 15 min and 23 hr 45 min post-evening dose. FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured through spirometry testing. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionL (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 150/320 μg2.386
QMF149 150/160 μg2.357
MF 800 μg2.249
MF 400 μg2.148
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg2.338

[back to top]

Trough FEV1 Measured After 26 Weeks of Treatment

Trough FEV1 was assessed by performing spirometric assessment. It is defined as average of the two FEV1 measurements taken 23 hr 15 min and 23 hr 45 min post-evening dose. FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured through spirometry testing. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionL (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 150/320 μg2.383
QMF149 150/160 μg2.387
MF 800 μg2.250
MF 400 μg2.176
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg2.346

[back to top]

Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) at Weeks 4, 12, 26 and 52

The ACQ-7 measured asthma symptom control and consists of 7 items: 5 on symptom assessment, 1 on rescue bronchodilator use and 1 on airway calibre (FEV1 % predicted). All 7 questions of the ACQ-7 were equally weighted. Items 1-5 were scored along a 7-point response scale, where 0 = totally controlled and 6 = severely uncontrolled. Item 6 is scored between 0 = no rescue medication and 6 = More than 16 puffs/inhalations most days. The 7th item was scored by the investigator based on the FEV1 % predicted from the masterscope at the site (i.e., Score = 0 means > 95% of predicted FEV1, 1 = 90 - 95%, 2 = 80 - 89%, 3 = 70 - 79%, 4 = 60 - 69%, 5 = 50 - 59%, and Score = 6 means < 50% of predicted FEV1). The total score was calculated as the mean of all questions. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 12, 26 and 52

,,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 12Week 26Week 52
MF 400 μg1.7301.6251.5091.449
MF 800 μg1.6591.5231.4391.373
QMF149 150/160 μg1.5331.3771.2611.183
QMF149 150/320 μg1.4861.3941.2671.231
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg1.5411.4451.3221.221

[back to top]

Annual Rate of Asthma Exacerbations by Exacerbation Category

The exacerbation categories were: All (mild, moderate and severe) and combination of moderate or severe and severe. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,,,,
Interventionexacerbations per year (Mean)
Moderate or severe asthma exacerbationSevere asthma exacerbationAll (mild, moderate, severe) asthma exacerbation
MF 400 μg0.560.291.05
MF 800 μg0.390.180.74
QMF149 150/160 μg0.270.130.48
QMF149 150/320 μg0.250.130.49
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg0.270.140.52

[back to top]

Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (Trough FEV1) at Week 26

Trough FEV1 was assessed by performing spirometric assessment. It is defined as average of the two FEV1 measurements taken 23 hr 15 min and 23 hr 45 min post-evening dose. FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured through spirometry testing. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionlitre (L) (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 150/320 μg2.383
QMF149 150/160 μg2.387
MF 800 μg2.250
MF 400 μg2.176
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg2.346

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Rescue Medication Free Days

All participants were given salbutamol/albuterol to use as rescue medication throughout the study along with e-Diary to record rescue medication use. Rescue medication free days is defined as any day where the participant did not use any puffs of rescue medication during daytime and night-time. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Weeks 26 and 52

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
Weeks 1-26Weeks 1-52
MF 400 μg19.120.8
MF 800 μg21.423.5
QMF149 150/160 μg27.429.4
QMF149 150/320 μg31.533.1
Salmeterol /Fluticasone 50/500 μg27.428.8

[back to top]

Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

FVC is the total amount of air exhaled during the FEV test. Trough FVC is defined as average of the two FVC measurements taken 23 hr 15 min and 23 hr 45 min post-evening dose. It was assessed by performing spirometric assessment. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52 (Day 365)

,,,,
InterventionL (Least Squares Mean)
Day 2Day 184Day 365
MF 400 μg3.2033.2463.218
MF 800 μg3.2563.3223.319
QMF149 150/160 μg3.3423.3873.364
QMF149 150/320 μg3.3423.3723.394
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg3.3443.3553.358

[back to top]

Trough Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF)Between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25-75)

FEF is the flow (or speed) of air coming out of the lung during the middle portion of a forced expiration. Trough FEF25-75% is defined as average of the two FEF25-75% measurements taken 23 hr 15 min and 23 hr 45 min post-evening dose. It was assessed by performing spirometric assessment. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52 (Day 365)

,,,,
InterventionLitres/second (L/s) (Least Squares Mean)
Day 2Day 184Day 365
MF 400 μg1.4061.4731.440
MF 800 μg1.4551.5461.530
QMF149 150/160 μg1.6171.7381.686
QMF149 150/320 μg1.6441.7751.745
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg1.6621.6921.692

[back to top]

Time to First Asthma Exacerbation by Exacerbation Category

The exacerbation categories were: All (mild, moderate and severe) and combination of moderate or severe and severe. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,,,,
Interventiondays (Median)
Moderate or severe asthma exacerbationSevere asthma exacerbationAll (mild, moderate or severe) asthma exacerbation
MF 400 μg364.0366306.0
MF 800 μg366.0366364.5
QMF149 150/160 μg366.0366366.0
QMF149 150/320 μg366.0367366.0
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg366.0366365.0

[back to top]

Rescue Medication Usage

All participants were given salbutamol/albuterol to use as rescue medication throughout the study along with e-Diary to record rescue medication use. The number of puffs of rescue medication during the past 12 hours is recorded twice (morning/evening) by the participant prior to taking study medication. The mean daily number of puffs of rescue medication use will be calculated for each participant, done separately for morning (night-time), evening (daytime), and daily (night-time plus daytime) rescue medication use (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Up to Weeks 26 and 52

,,,,
Interventionnumber of puffs (Least Squares Mean)
Week1-26 Mean night-time number of puffsWeek1-26 Mean daytime number of puffsWeek1-26 Mean daily number of puffsWeek1-52 Mean night-time number of puffsWeek 1-52 Mean daytime number of puffsWeek 1-52 Mean daily number of puffs
MF 400 μg-0.19-0.34-0.53-0.20-0.36-0.56
MF 800 μg-0.26-0.38-0.65-0.29-0.43-0.72
QMF149 150/160 μg-0.27-0.46-0.73-0.30-0.51-0.80
QMF149 150/320 μg-0.38-0.57-0.96-0.40-0.60-1.00
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/500 μg-0.34-0.53-0.87-0.35-0.55-0.91

[back to top]

Pre-dose FEV1 at Weeks 4 and 12

Pre-dose trough FEV1 is defined as average of the two FEV1 measurements taken 45 min and 15 min pre evening dose. It was assessed by performing spirometric assessment. FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured through spirometry testing. (NCT02554786)
Timeframe: Weeks 4 (Day 30) and 12 (Day 86)

,,,,
InterventionL (Least Squares Mean)
Day 30Day 86
MF 400 μg2.1712.177
MF 800 μg2.2372.245
QMF149 150/160 μg2.3672.361
QMF149 150/320 μg2.3692.368
Salmeterol /Fluticasone 50/500 μg0.23332.330

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mast Cells Count (Tryptase Positive) in the Bronchial Submucosa at Week 12

Inflammatory cells i.e. mast cells were counted in the bronchial submucosa of biopsy thin sections using quantitative immunohistochemistry and reported as the number of cells per square millimeter. (NCT02573233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventioncells/mm^2 (Mean)
Placebo2.37
Dupilumab-20.89

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during between the first administration of study medication to the end of the 12 week Post-treatment Period. Serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included both serious and non-serious AEs. (NCT02573233)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEAny treatment emergent SAEAny TEAE leading to deathAny TEAE leading to permanent discontinuation
Dupilumab15100
Placebo17000

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK) Assessment: Serum Functional Dupilumab Concentration

Serum functional dupilumab concentrations were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. (NCT02573233)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 2, 6, 8, 12, 18, End of study (Week 24)

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Week 0Week 2Week 6Week 8Week 12Week 18Week 24
Dupilumab0.0052675.0059969.0061097.9567387.0020728.171851.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mucin-Stained Area in the Bronchial Submucosa at Week 12

Mucin was identified by staining with Alcian-blue periodic acid-Schiff and/or immunostaining for MUC5AC and then the mucin-positive area was measured and expressed per square millimeter. (NCT02573233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventioncells/mm^2 (Mean)
Placebo64.09
Dupilumab-142.74

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in T-Helper Lymphocytes Count in the Bronchial Submucosa at Week 12

T-helper i.e. CD4 positive lymphocytes were counted in the bronchial submucosa of biopsy thin sections using quantitative immunohistochemistry and reported as the number of cells per square millimeter. (NCT02573233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventioncells/mm^2 (Median)
Placebo7.26
Dupilumab62.34

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in T-Lymphocytes Count in the Bronchial Submucosa at Week 12

T-Lymphocytes i.e. CD3 positive cells were counted in the bronchial submucosa of biopsy thin sections using quantitative immunohistochemistry and reported as the number of cells per square millimeter. (NCT02573233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventioncells/mm^2 (Median)
Placebo-36.70
Dupilumab34.21

[back to top]

Average Change in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) From Baseline to Week 6 Through Week 12

"FeNO is a surrogate marker for airway inflammation. FeNO was analyzed using a NIOX instrument or similar analyzer using a flow rate of 50 mL/s, and reported in ppb.~The average change in FeNO from baseline to Week 6 through Week 12 was calculated as follows: For each participant the change in FeNO from Baseline to Week 6, Week 8, Week 10 and Week 12 was calculated (value at Week X - value at baseline). Subsequently the weekly mean of these 4 change from baseline values was determined (Weeks 6, 8, 10 and 12). Using these weekly mean values the overall arithmetic mean and standard deviation of the average change in FeNO from baseline to Week 6 through Week 12 was calculated." (NCT02573233)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 6 through Week 12

Interventionppb (Mean)
Placebo3.5
Dupilumab-16.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Eosinophils Cells Count in the Bronchial Submucosa at Week 12

Inflammatory cells i.e. eosinophils were counted in the bronchial submucosa of biopsy thin sections using quantitative immunohistochemistry and reported as the number of cells per square millimeter. (NCT02573233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventioncells/mm^2 (Median)
Placebo5.80
Dupilumab-6.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) at Week 12

FeNO is a surrogate marker for airway inflammation. FeNO was analyzed using a NIOX instrument or similar analyzer using a flow rate of 50 mL/second, and reported in ppb. (NCT02573233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionppb (Mean)
Placebo3.9
Dupilumab-15.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mast Cells Count (Chymase Positive) in the Bronchial Submucosa at Week 12

Inflammatory cells i.e. mast cells were counted in the bronchial submucosa of biopsy thin sections using quantitative immunohistochemistry and reported as the number of cells per square millimeter. (NCT02573233)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventioncells/mm^2 (Mean)
Placebo-14.80
Dupilumab1.76

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Antidrug Antibodies (ADA)

Anti-drug antibodies were detected using a validated immunoassay. Incidence of ADA were classified as following: 1) Pre-existing immunoreactivity - an ADA positive response in the assay at baseline with all post treatment ADA results negative or an ADA positive response at baseline with all post treatment ADA responses less than 4-fold over baseline titer levels. 2) Treatment-emergent ADA: an ADA positive response in the assay post first dose, when baseline results were negative or missing. 3) Treatment-boosted ADA: an ADA positive response in the assay post first dose that was greater-than or equal to 4-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results were positive. (NCT02573233)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to 24 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
With pre-existing immunoreactivityWith treatment-emergent ADAWith treatment-boosted ADA
Dupilumab010
Placebo100

[back to top]

Change in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptoms Score (rTNSS) From Baseline to End of Treatment.

Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) was calculated as the sum of 12-hour reflective scoring of the severity of four nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing). Subjects responded on a 4-point severity scale with scores ranging from 0 (no signs/symptoms evident) to 3 (severe signs/symptoms that is hard to tolerate). The rTNSS was calculated as the sum of the subject-reported severity scores for nasal symptoms, and value ranged from 0 (no signs/symptoms evident) to 12 (severe signs/symptoms that is hard to tolerate). (NCT02631551)
Timeframe: 14 days

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from baseline to end of treatment
GSP 301 NS10.1-3.6
GSP 301 Placebo NS10.2-2.8
Mometasone Furoate NS10.2-3.5
Olopatadine HCl NS10.3-3.2

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA) Rescue Medication With MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID or MF MDI 100 mcg BID Over the First 12 Weeks of Treatment

To evaluate the efficacy of MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID compared with MF MDI 100 mcg BID, the change from baseline in total daily short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) use (puffs per day) was averaged and assessed. All participants received SABA MDIs (albuterol 90 mcg or salbutamol 100 mcg) for as-needed relief of asthma symptoms. This secondary analysis of the change from baseline used the cLDA method without multiple imputation.A model-based MAR approach was used for missing data. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1-12 (Averaged)

,
InterventionPuffs per day (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline Over Weeks 1-12 (Average)
MF MDI 100 mcg BID0.13-0.02
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID0.25-0.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Morning (AM) Post-Dose % Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) in the Area Under the Curve (AUC)0-60

This endpoint reflects changes in lung function data (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) measured across 0 to 60 minutes post-dose (at 0, 5, 15, 30 and 60 minutes) and averaged across study visits in the Treatment Period (Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12) compared to Baseline. Baseline was the average of % predicted FEV1 values at 30 min and 0 min pre-dose. At each visit, the area under the curve is calculated over the post-dose timepoints. Units are standardized to percent predicted FEV1 by dividing the AUC calculation by the duration of the observed AUC. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Baseline, and average of Day 1, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12

,
InterventionPercent predicted FEV1 (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
MF MDI 100 mcg BID78.483.96
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID79.218.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AM Pre-Dose % Predicted FEV1 With MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID or MF MDI 100 mcg BID Over the First 12 Weeks of Treatment

The change from baseline in AM pre-dose % predicted FEV1 with MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID vs MF MDI 100 mcg BID averaged over 12 weeks treatment was assessed. This secondary analysis of the change from baseline used the cLDA method without multiple imputation. A model-based MAR approach was used for missing data. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 (Averaged)

,
InterventionPercent predicted FEV1 (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline (Weeks 4, 8, and 12)
MF MDI 100 mcg BID78.220.44
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID79.211.51

[back to top]

Change From Baseline AM Post-Dose Percent Predicted FEV1 on Day 1 of Treatment

The key secondary objective was to determine the onset of action for the efficacy of MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID, compared with MF MDI 100 mcg BID. The post-dose AM % predicted FEV1 was averaged sequentially, and the change from baseline on Day 1 was assessed. This key secondary endpoint was controlled for multiplicity in a step-down fashion, based on trial success defined as a statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint for MF/F vs MF. Missing data were imputed using control-based multiple imputations with the cLDA model. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1, measured at 4 hr, 2 hr and 60, 30, 15, and 5 min, post-dose time points

,
InterventionPercent predicted FEV1 (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline (4 hr post-dose on Day 1)Change from Baseline (2 hr post-dose on Day 1)Change from Baseline (60 min post-dose on Day 1)Change from Baseline (30 min post-dose on Day 1)Change from Baseline (15 min post-dose on Day 1)Change from Baseline (5 min post-dose on Day 1)
MF MDI 100 mcg BID78.485.685.874.923.051.380.95
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID79.2111.6112.7111.059.568.005.20

[back to top]

Count (Percentage) of Participants Discontinuing From Study Medication Due to An AE

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID0
MF MDI 100 mcg BID3
Total3

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve of Mometasone Furoate From Time 0 to 12 Hours (AUC0-12)

Blood samples were collected predose, and 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12 in a subset of participants who consented to take part in a PK sub-trial. Per protocol, descriptive MF pharmacokinetics were summarized without regard to treatment assignment. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12

Interventionhr*pg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Pooled MF/F 100/10 mcg and MF 100 mcg109

[back to top]

Change From Baseline AM Post-Dose % Predicted FEV1 AUC 0-4 Hours on Day 1 and Week 12 of Treatment

This endpoint reflects changes in lung function data (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) measured across 0 to 4 hours post-dose on Day 1 and Week 12 compared to Baseline. Baseline was the average of 30 and 0 minutes pre-dose % predicted FEV1 values. The AUC was calculated over the scheduled timepoints of 0 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 2 hr and 4 hr post-dose. Units are standardized to percent predicted FEV1 by dividing the AUC calculation by the duration of the observed AUC. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 and Week 12

,
InterventionPercent predicted FEV1 (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline on Day 1Change from Baseline at Week 12
MF MDI 100 mcg BID78.482.704.87
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID79.217.137.56

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Mometsone Furoate

Blood samples were collected predose, and 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12 in a subset of participants who consented to take part in a PK sub-trial. Per protocol, descriptive MF pharmacokinetics were summarized without regard to treatment assignment. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12

Interventionhr (Median)
Pooled MF/F 100/10 mcg and MF 100 mcg1.47

[back to top]

Participants Whose SABA Rescue Medication Use Increased Across Weeks 1-12 of the Treatment Period

To evaluate the efficacy of MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID compared with MF MDI 100 mcg BID, the number of participants whose use of SABA rescue medication increased in Weeks 1-12 (individually) of the double-blind treatment period was assessed. All participants received SABA MDIs (albuterol 90 mcg or salbutamol 100 mcg) for relief of asthma symptoms. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Weeks 1-12 (Averaged)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID24
MF MDI 100 mcg BID34

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mometsone Furoate

Blood samples were collected predose, and 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12 in a subset of participants who consented to take part in a PK sub-trial. Per protocol, descriptive MF pharmacokinetics were summarized without regard to treatment assignment. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Pooled MF/F 100/10 mcg and MF 100 mcg16

[back to top]

Count (Percentage) of Participants Experiencing At Least One Adverse Event (AE)

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Up to 26 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID37
MF MDI 100 mcg BID52
Total89

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve of Mometasone Furoate From Time 0 to Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last)

Blood samples were collected predose, and 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12 in a subset of participants who consented to take part in a PK sub-trial. Per protocol, descriptive MF pharmacokinetics were summarized without regard to treatment assignment. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.75, 1.5, 3, 8, and 12 hours postdose at Week 12

Interventionhr*pg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Pooled MF/F 100/10 mcg and MF 100 mcg106

[back to top]

Participants Using SABA Rescue Medication Across Weeks 1-12 of the Treatment Period

To evaluate the efficacy of MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID compared with MF MDI 100 mcg BID, the number of participants using SABA rescue medication in Weeks 1-12 (individually) of the double-blind treatment period was assessed. All participants received SABA MDIs (albuterol 90 mcg or salbutamol 100 mcg) for as-needed relief of asthma symptoms. (NCT02741271)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1-12 (Averaged)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
BaselineWeeks 1-12
MF MDI 100 mcg BID1745
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID2341

[back to top]

SNOT-22 (Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22) Score

"Measurement of secondary outcome- the SNOT-22 test contains 22 items regarding patient-reported outcomes of sino-nasal symptom severity on a 0-5 scale for each item. 0 is no problem and 5 is problem as bad as it can be, so higher values represent a worse outcome than lower values. The subscale is 0 - 5 of each of the 22 items and the total score is the sum of the subscales of all 22 items. The minimum total score is 0/110. The maximum total score is 110/110.~This secondary outcome measured change in patient-reported outcomes of nasal symptoms as measured by Sino Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) over 12 weeks in the AZD1981 group vs. the placebo group." (NCT02874144)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1 (baseline)Visit 5 (12 weeks)
AZD + INCS33.7326.07
PLACEBO + INCS40.4136.13

[back to top]

Sinus CT Scan Scores by Lund-Mackay Scores

Measurement of secondary outcome: sinus CT scan scores by Lund-Mckay scores. We measured sinus radiographic severity with Lund-Mackay scores of 0 to 24. 0 was the least severe and 24 was the most severe. This secondary outcomes included change in radiographic severity of sinus disease, as measured by sinus CT scan scores at baseline and 12 weeks in the AZD1981 group vs. the placebo group. (NCT02874144)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1 (Baseline)Visit 5 (12 weeks)
AZD + INCS17.4418.25
PLACEBO + INCS15.5316.33

[back to top]

BSIT (Brief Smell Identification Test)

"Measurement of secondary outcome- BSIT (brief smell identification test) is a 12-item test measuring sense of smell. This is a multiple choice test with one correct answer out of four possible answer choices. This test features distinct types of smells. Minimum score: 0/12, which indicates that none of the correct answers were chosen on the 12-item test. Maximum score: 12/12, which indicates that all of the correct answers were chosen on the 12-item test. The higher the score, the better the outcome. Only one out of the four possible answer choices for each multiple choice question is correct. There are no subscales.~This secondary outcome measures sense of smell by Brief Smell Identification Test (B-SIT) at baseline (visit 1) and 12 weeks (visit 5) in the AZD1981 group vs. the placebo group." (NCT02874144)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1 (Baseline)Visit 5 (12 weeks)
AZD + INCS5.756.92
PLACEBO + INCS5.205.80

[back to top]

TOTAL POLYP SCORE (TPS)

"Measure Description:~Measurement of Primary outcome- 0-4 scale in each nostril, total is 8. The total polyp score is the sum of the right and left nasal polyp score. Maximum is 8, minimum is 0. Higher score indicates worse disease. 0 =No polyps 1=Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2=Polyps reaching the lower border of the middle turbinate or polyp medial to the middle turbinate 3 = Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate 4 =Large polyps causing complete obstruction.~The primary outcome measured change in polyp size and secondary outcomes included change in radiographic severity of sinus disease, quality of life, and nasal symptoms as measured by Sino Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and sense of smell by Brief Smell Identification Test (B-SIT) at 12 weeks in the AZD1981 group vs. the placebo. These were done at the baseline visit and the Week 12 visit." (NCT02874144)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
AZD + INCS4.67
PLACEBO + INCS5.24

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Measurement of secondary outcome- 0 to 10 scale bilaterally that measures how subjective sinus symptom severity, with 0 being the least troublesome to 10 being the most troublesome over 12 weeks in the AZD1981 group vs. the placebo group. (NCT02874144)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1Visit 5
AZD + INCS5.574.75
PLACEBO + INCS5.704.74

[back to top]

Patency Rate

Patency of the frontal recess/frontal sinus ostia (FSO) was evaluated on a 3-point grading scale from 0 to 2, with 0=Patent, 1=Restenosed/partially occluded, and 2=Occluded. The percentage of sinuses with patency grade 0 and 1 was used to calculate the patency rate. (NCT02880514)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionsinus sides (Count of Units)
PROPEL Mini Sinus Implant38
Balloon Sinus Dilation Alone33

[back to top]

Inflammation Score

Inflammation visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (no visible inflammation) to 100 (severe inflammation, involving significant and extensive erythema and edema and/or hypertrophy and/or polypoid changes) (NCT02880514)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionmm (Mean)
PROPEL Mini Sinus Implant43.2
Balloon Sinus Dilation Alone45.8

[back to top]

The Number of Asthma Exacerbations (Moderate or Severe) Over the 12 Week Treatment Period

Annual incidence rate of asthma exacerbation by severity of exacerbation. The number of asthma exacerbation is used to calculate annual incidence rate. A severe asthma exacerbation is SCS (Systemic Corticosteroids) use ≥3 days and hospitalization or emergency department visit (greater than 24 h) or death due to asthma. A moderate asthma exacerbation is SCS use ≥3 days either as an outpatient or in emergency department visits (less than or equal to 24 h). Worsening of asthma not requiring more than 3 days of SCS or hospitalization/emergency room will be considered mild asthma exacerbations (NCT02892344)
Timeframe: Week 12

,
InterventionNumber of exacerbation (Number)
Moderate or severe asthma exacerbationAll (mild, moderate, severe) asthma exacerbation
MF 200 µg0.310.67
QMF149 150/80 μg0.080.20

[back to top]

Rescue Medication Use Over 12 Weeks

Rescue salbutamol/albuterol usage (mean daily, nighttime and daytime use) from e-Diary recordings over 12 weeks of treatment (NCT02892344)
Timeframe: week 12

,
InterventionNumber of puffs of rescue medication (Least Squares Mean)
Night-time number of puffs of rescue medicationDaytime number of puffs of rescue medication
MF 200 µg-0.16-0.24
QMF149 150/80 μg-0.26-0.39

[back to top]

PEF Over 4 and 12 Weeks

Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEF) will be measured. PEF is the peak expiratory flow, the maximum speed of expiration (NCT02892344)
Timeframe: week 12

,
InterventionL/min (Least Squares Mean)
Mean Morning PEF (n=382,382)Mean Evening PEF (n=386,386)
MF 200 µg3.80.7
QMF149 150/80 μg31.026.8

[back to top]

Trough FEV1 at Day 2

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured through spirometry testing (NCT02892344)
Timeframe: Day 2

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 150/80 μg2.490
MF 200 µg2.358

[back to top]

Trough FEV1

demonstrate the superiority of QMF149 150/80 microgram o.d. (in the evening) delivered via Concept1 compared with MF 200 microgram o.d. (in the evening) delivered via Twisthaler® in terms of trough FEV1 after 12 weeks of treatment in adults and adolescents. Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured by spirometry. (NCT02892344)
Timeframe: week 12

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 150/80 μg2.562
MF 200 µg2.379

[back to top]

Quality of Life Assessed by Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire AQLQ-S 12

The AQLQ is a 32-item disease specific questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments in asthma. Patients are asked to score each item on a 7-point scale based on the experience of last 2 weeks. The overall AQLQ score is the mean response to all 32 questions. Therefore, the possible highest score (better) would be 7 and the lowest (worse) would be 1. Changes in scores of 0.5 to 1.0 are considered clinically meaningful; 1.0 to 1.5 as moderate and > 1.5 as marked clinically important differences for any individual domain or for the overall summary score. (NCT02892344)
Timeframe: week 12

InterventionScore (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 150/80 μg5.779
MF 200 µg5.630

[back to top]

ACQ-7 at Week 4

ACQ-7 is an asthma control questionnaire (scoring 5 symptoms, FEV1 entered by the investigator and daily rescue bronchodilator use entered by the patient) validated to evaluate different levels of asthma control (NCT02892344)
Timeframe: week 4

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 150/80 μg1.454
MF 200 µg1.658

[back to top]

ACQ-7

ACQ-7 is an asthma control questionnaire (scoring 5 symptoms, FEV1 entered by the investigator and daily rescue bronchodilator use entered by the patient) validated to evaluate different levels of asthma control. the ACQ-7 was used to assess improvements in asthma symptom control. The ACQ-7, a seven-item disease-specific instrument developed and validated to assess asthma control in patients in clinical trials as well as in individuals in clinical practice, was provided to the site. All seven items were then scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating total control and 6 indicating no control. The questions were equally weighted and the total score was the mean of the seven items. The first 6 questions of the ACQ-7 were completed by the patient while the last question (question 7) was completed by the study investigator using spirometry data generated by the spirometry equipment. (NCT02892344)
Timeframe: week 12

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 150/80 μg1.323
MF 200 µg1.540

[back to top]

Pre-dose FEV1 at Week 4

Pre-dose FEV1 is defined as the mean of -45 min and -15 min FEV1 values pre-evening dose (NCT02892344)
Timeframe: week 4

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 150/80 μg2.545
MF 200 µg2.369

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Asthma Exacerbation Over 12 Weeks

The exacerbation categories are: mild, moderate, severe and the combination of moderate or severe. Time to first asthma exacerbation by exacerbation category. Annual rate of asthma exacerbations by exacerbation category. (NCT02892344)
Timeframe: Week 12

,
InterventionNumber of patients (Number)
Mild asthma exacerbationModerate asthma exacerbationSevere asthma exacerbationModerate or severe asthma exacerbation
MF 200 µg29231132
QMF149 150/80 μg117310

[back to top]

Percentage of Rescue Medication Free Days Over 12 Weeks

Percentage of rescue medication free days over 12 weeks of treatment period (NCT02892344)
Timeframe: week 12

InterventionPercentage (Least Squares Mean)
QMF149 150/80 μg22.2
MF 200 µg14.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With ACQ-7 MID at Week 12

MID is Minimum Important Difference. ACQ-7 is an asthma control questionnaire (scoring 5 symptoms, FEV1 entered by the investigator and daily rescue bronchodilator use entered by the patient) validated to evaluate different levels of asthma control. Percent of patients achieving the minimal important difference (MID) in ACQ-7 (i.e. at least 0.5 decrease from baseline) will be measured. (NCT02892344)
Timeframe: week 12

InterventionPercentage (Number)
QMF149 150/80 μg74.7
MF 200 µg64.9

[back to top]

Number of Patients With First Asthma Exacerbations (Moderate or Severe) Over the 12 Week Treatment Period

The annual rate of asthma exacerbations were analyzed using a generalized linear model. (NCT02892344)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionCount of participants (Number)
QMF149 150/80 μg10
MF 200 µg32

[back to top]

FVC Over 12 Weeks

FVC is the total amount of air exhaled during the FEV test. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Forced Expiratory Flow between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25-75) will be measured (NCT02892344)
Timeframe: week 12

,
InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
Pre dose trough FVC (n=383,379)Pre-dose trough FEF25-75% (n=383,379)
MF 200 µg3.3531.742
QMF149 150/80 μg3.4532.030

[back to top]

Daily E-diary Over 12 Weeks

Percentage of asthma symptoms free days, the percentage of nights without nighttime awakenings, and the percentage of mornings without symptoms on awakening as recorded by daily electronic Diary (e-Diary) over 12 weeks of treatment (NCT02892344)
Timeframe: week 12

,
InterventionPercentage (Least Squares Mean)
% of nights with no night-time awakenings% of mornings with no symptoms on awakening% of asthma symptom-free days
MF 200 µg8.711.214.4
QMF149 150/80 μg13.414.717.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Scores

The SNOT-22 is a validated questionnaire was used to assess the impact of chronic rhinosinusitis phenotype with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). It is a 22 item questionnaire with each item assigned a score ranging from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score may range from 0 (no disease) to 110 (worst disease), lower scores representing better health related quality of life. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-10.40
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-27.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) for Participants With Asthma

ACQ-6 had 6 questions which assessed the most common asthma symptoms (woken by asthma, symptoms on waking, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheezing, puffs/inhalations use). Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to the symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 = no impairment to 6 = maximum impairment. The ACQ-6 score was the mean of the scores of all 6 questions and therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled), with higher scores indicated lower asthma control. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline value, treatment, asthma status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.08
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-0.78

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in European Quality of Life 5 Dimension Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale Score

The EQ-5D was a standardized HRQoL questionnaire consisting of EQ-5D descriptive system and EQ VAS. The EQ-5D descriptive system comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension had 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. EQ VAS recorded the participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS that allowed them to indicate their health state that can range from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable). All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.91
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)10.83

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity Score

NC symptom severity was assessed by the participants on a daily basis from visit 1 and throughout the study using an e-diary on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms, with higher scores indicated more severity. Least squares (LS) means and standard error (SE) were obtained from Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.38
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-1.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma

NC symptom severity was assessed by the participants on a daily basis from Visit 1 and throughout the study using an e-diary on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms, with higher scores indicated more severity. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.39
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-1.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery

NC symptom severity was assessed by the participants on a daily basis from Visit 1 and throughout the study using an e-diary on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms, with higher scores indicated more severity. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.27
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-1.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow (NPIF)

NPIF evaluation represented a physiologic measure of the air flow through both nasal cavities during forced inspiration expressed in liters per minute. Higher NPIF values were indicative of better nasal air flow. Data was analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline value, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionliters per minute (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo18.65
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)55.29

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score

NPS: sum of right, left nostril scores, evaluated by nasal endoscopy. For each nostril, NPS was graded based on polyp size from 0 = no polyps to 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction of inferior nasal cavity; lower score = smaller sized polyps. Total NPS: sum of right and left nostril scores, ranges from 0 (no polyps) to 8 (large polyps), higher score = more severe disease. NPS was assessed by centralized, blinded, independent review of the nasal endoscopy video recordings. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.10
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-1.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma

NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores, as evaluated by means of nasal endoscopy. For each nostril, NPS was graded from 0 to 4 (0 = no polyps to 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity), with a lower score indicating smaller-sized polyps. Total NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyp) to 8 (large polyp), with highest score representing more severe disease. NPS was assessed by centralized, blinded, independent review of the nasal endoscopy video recordings. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. LS mean and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.13
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-1.88

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery

NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores, as evaluated by means of nasal endoscopy. For each nostril, NPS was graded from 0 to 4 (0 = no polyps to 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity), with a lower score indicating smaller-sized polyps. Total NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyp) to 8 (large polyp), with highest score representing more severe disease. NPS was assessed by centralized, blinded, independent review of the nasal endoscopy video recordings. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. LS mean and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.22
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-1.73

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay (LMK) Score

The LMK scoring system rated each of both the left and right frontal, maxillary, sphenoid, ostiomeatal complex, anterior ethmoid and posterior ethmoid sinuses using following grading: 0 = normal, 1 = partial opacification, 2 = total opacification. The total score was the sum of scores from each side and ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified); higher score indicated more severe disease. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. NOTE: For Japan regulatory submission only, this endpoint is not included as a secondary outcome measure and is instead one of the co-primary outcome measures. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.09
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-5.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma

The LMK scoring system rated each of both the left and right frontal, maxillary, sphenoid, ostiomeatal complex, anterior ethmoid and posterior ethmoid sinuses using following grading: 0 = normal, 1 = partial opacification, 2 = total opacification. The total score was the sum of scores from each side and ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified); higher score indicated more severe disease. Data was analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline value, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.33
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-5.86

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery

The LMK scoring system rated each of both the left and right frontal, maxillary, sphenoid, ostiomeatal complex, anterior ethmoid and posterior ethmoid sinuses using following grading: 0 = normal, 1 = partial opacification, 2 = total opacification. The total score was the sum of scores from each side and ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified); higher score indicated more severe disease. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, and regions as covariates. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.10
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-5.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Rhinorrhea Daily Symptom Score

Rhinorrhea was reported by the participants using a 0 to 3 categorical scale (where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms), where higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. Data was analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline value, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.40
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-0.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Severity of Decreased/Loss of Smell as Assessed by Participant Daily

The severity of decreased/loss of sense of smell was reported by the participants using a 0 to 3 categorical scale (where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms), higher score indicated more severe symptoms. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.23
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-1.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) Score

The UPSIT was a 40-item test to measure the individual's ability to detect odors. Total score ranges from 0 (anosmia) to 40 (normal sense of smell), lower score indicated severe smell loss. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.81
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)9.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Total Symptom Score (TSS)

The TSS was the sum of participant-assessed nasal symptom scores for NC/obstruction, decreased/loss of sense of smell, and rhinorrhea (anterior/posterior nasal discharge), each accessed on 0-3 categorical scale (where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms). Total score ranged from 0 (no symptoms) to 9 (severe symptoms). Higher score indicated more severe symptoms. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.00
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-3.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Rhinosinusitis

"The VAS for rhinosinusitis was used to evaluate the total disease severity. The participants were asked to indicate on a 10 centimeters VAS the answer to the question, How troublesome are your symptoms of your rhinosinusitis? The range of the VAS was from 0 (not troublesome) to 10 (worse thinkable troublesome), where higher score indicated worse thinkable troublesome. Data was analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline value, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments." (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventioncentimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.39
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-4.32

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test Scores

The SNOT-22 is a validated questionnaire that was used to assess the impact of CRSwNP on HRQoL. It is a 22 item questionnaire with each item assigned a score ranging from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score may range from 0 (no disease) to 110 (worst disease), lower scores representing better health related quality of life. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-9.06
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w-30.42
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-29.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 for Participants With Asthma

ACQ-6 had 6 questions which assessed the most common asthma symptoms (woken by asthma, symptoms on waking, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheezing, puffs/inhalations use). Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to the symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 = no impairment to 6 = maximum impairment. The ACQ-6 score was the mean of the scores of all 6 questions and therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled), with higher scores indicated lower asthma control. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline value, treatment, asthma status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.12
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w-0.76
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-0.83

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in European Quality of Life 5 Dimension Scale Visual Analog Scale Score

The EQ-5D was a standardized HRQoL questionnaire consisting of EQ-5D descriptive system and EQ VAS. The EQ-5D descriptive system comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension had 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. EQ VAS recorded the participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS that allowed them to indicate their health state that can range from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable). (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.38
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w11.98
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w13.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second for Participants With Asthma

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. Data was analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline value, treatment group, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.18
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w0.10
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity Score

NC symptom severity was assessed by the participants on a daily basis from Visit 1 and throughout the study using an e-diary on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms, with higher scores indicated more severity. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.37
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w-1.48
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-1.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma

NC symptom severity was assessed by the participants on a daily basis from Visit 1 and throughout the study using an e-diary on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms, with higher scores indicated more severity. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.34
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w-1.51
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-1.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery

NC symptom severity was assessed by the participants on a daily basis from Visit 1 and throughout the study using an e-diary on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms, with higher scores indicated more severity. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, and regions as covariates. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.25
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w-1.54
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-1.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Polyp Score

NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores, as evaluated by means of nasal endoscopy. For each nostril, NPS was graded based on polyp size from 0 to 4 (0 = no polyps to 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity), with a lower score indicating smaller-sized polyps. Total NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyp) to 8 (large polyp), with highest score representing more severe disease. NPS was assessed by centralized, blinded, independent review of the nasal endoscopy video recordings. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.16
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w-2.05
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-2.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Polyp Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma

NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores, as evaluated by means of nasal endoscopy. For each nostril, NPS was graded from 0 to 4 (0 = no polyps to 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity), with a lower score indicating smaller-sized polyps. Total NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyp) to 8 (large polyp), with highest score representing more severe disease. NPS was assessed by centralized, blinded, independent review of the nasal endoscopy video recordings. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. LS mean and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.29
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w-2.25
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-2.34

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund-Mackay Score

The LMK scoring system rated each of both the left and right frontal, maxillary, sphenoid, ostiomeatal complex, anterior ethmoid and posterior ethmoid sinuses using following grading: 0 = normal, 1 = partial opacification, 2 = total opacification. The total score was the sum of scores from each side and ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified); higher score indicated more severe disease. Data was analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline value, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.11
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w-5.60
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-6.83

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery

The LMK scoring system rated each of both the left and right frontal, maxillary, sphenoid, ostiomeatal complex, anterior ethmoid and posterior ethmoid sinuses using following grading: 0 = normal, 1 = partial opacification, 2 = total opacification. The total score was the sum of scores from each side and ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified); higher score indicated more severe disease. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, and regions as covariates. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.06
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w-6.01
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-7.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma

The LMK scoring system rated each of both the left and right frontal, maxillary, sphenoid, ostiomeatal complex, anterior ethmoid and posterior ethmoid sinuses using following grading: 0 = normal, 1 = partial opacification, 2 = total opacification. The total score was the sum of scores from each side and ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified); higher score indicated more severe disease. Data was analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline value, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.20
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w-6.23
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-7.22

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Polyp Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery

NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores, as evaluated by means of nasal endoscopy. For each nostril, NPS was graded from 0 to 4 (0 = no polyps to 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity), with a lower score indicating smaller-sized polyps. Total NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyp) to 8 (large polyp), with highest score representing more severe disease. NPS was assessed by centralized, blinded, independent review of the nasal endoscopy video recordings. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. LS mean and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.21
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w-2.22
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-2.56

[back to top]

Rescue Treatment Use: Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 1 Event by Week 52 Obtained Using Kaplan-Meier Method

"Rescue treatment was defined as usage of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) or NP surgery (actual or planned) during the treatment period. Rescue treatment included:~SCS: betamethasone, deflazacort, dexamethasone, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, hydrocortisone, meprednisone, methylprednisolone, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, prednisolone, prednisolone sodium succinate, prednisone, stelamin, triamcinolone, and triamcinolone acetonide.~Sino-nasal surgery for nasal polyps when there was worsening of signs and/or symptoms during the study.~Estimate of percentage of participants with event by Week 52 was obtained using Kaplan-Meier method." (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 52 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
SCS treatmentNP surgery
Dupilumab 300 mg (Pooled Arm)13.15.5
Placebo42.528.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent And Treatment-Boosted Anti-drug Antibodies Response (ADA)

ADA response were categorized as: treatment emergent and treatment boosted response. 1) Treatment emergent was defined as a positive response in the ADA assay post first dose, when baseline results are negative or missing. 2) Treatment boosted was defined as: an ADA positive response in the assay post first dose that is greater-than or equal to 4-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
With treatment-emergent ADAWith treatment-boosted ADA
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w80
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w180
Placebo61

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation

An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened in grade or became serious during TEAE period which was defined as the period from the time of first dose of drug until 84 days following the last administration of drug. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 84 days after last dose of study drug (up to 64 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEAny treatment emergent SAEAny TEAE leading to deathTEAE leading to treatment discontinuation
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w125806
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w1341212
Placebo13816017

[back to top]

Functional Dupilumab Concentration in Serum

(NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 16, Week 24, Week 40, End of treatment (Week 52), End of study (Week 64)

,
Interventionnanogram/milliliter (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Week 4Week 16Week 24Week 40Week 52Week 64
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w0.0022285.6737326.3174382.0479890.0680526.3775872.58851.30
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w0.0021545.7933760.6270503.0775929.4121052.0617276.1353.60

[back to top]

Total Systemic Corticosteroids Rescue Intake Duration: Average Duration Per Participant

Rescue treatment was defined as usage of SCS or NP surgery (actual or planned) during the treatment period. SCS Rescue intake duration was defined as the duration (in days) from start of SCS rescue medication till the end of SCS rescue treatment. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

Interventiondays (Mean)
Placebo19.58
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w10.71
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w23.23

[back to top]

Mean Total Systemic Corticosteroids Rescue Dose Prescribed During Treatment Period

SCS included: betamethasone, deflazacort, dexamethasone, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, hydrocortisone, meprednisone, methylprednisolone, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, prednisolone, prednisolone sodium succinate, prednisone, stelamin, triamcinolone, and triamcinolone acetonide. For every participant, the total dose was calculated as (prescribed total daily dose*duration of SCS use). Then, mean of the total dose of 64 participants (placebo group), 17 participants (dupilumab 300 mg q2w then q4w) and 22 participants (dupilumab 300 mg q2w) was derived. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

Interventionmilligrams (Mean)
Placebo547.56
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w282.38
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w389.68

[back to top]

Changed From Baseline at Week 24 in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) for Participants With Asthma

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. Data was analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline value, treatment group, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.05
Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)0.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Visual Analogue Scale for Rhinosinusitis

"The VAS for rhinosinusitis was used to evaluate the total disease severity. The participants were asked to indicate on a 10 centimeters VAS the answer to the question, How troublesome are your symptoms of your rhinosinusitis? The range of the VAS was from 0 (not troublesome) to 10 (worse thinkable troublesome), where higher score indicated worse thinkable troublesome. Data was analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline value, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates." (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventioncentimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.93
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w-4.39
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-4.74

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Total Symptom Score

The TSS was the sum of participant-assessed nasal symptom scores for NC/obstruction, decreased/loss of sense of smell, and rhinorrhea (anterior/posterior nasal discharge), each accessed on 0-3 categorical scale (where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms). Total score ranged from 0 (no symptoms) to 9 (severe symptoms). Higher score indicated more severe symptoms. Data was analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline value, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.93
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w-4.17
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-3.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test Score

The UPSIT was a 40-item test to measure the individual's ability to detect odors. Total score ranges from 0 (anosmia) to 40 (normal sense of smell), lower score indicated severe smell loss. Data was analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline value, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.78
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w9.99
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w9.53

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Severity of Decreased/Loss of Smell

The severity of decreased/loss of sense of smell was reported by the participants using a 0 to 3 categorical scale (where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms), higher score indicated more severe symptoms. Data was analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline value, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.18
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w-1.49
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-1.29

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Rhinorrhea Daily Symptom Score

Rhinorrhea was reported by the participants using a 0 to 3 categorical scale (where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms), where higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. Data was analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline value, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02898454)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.35
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w-1.19
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w-1.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 and 48 in Severity of Decreased/Loss of Smell as Assessed by Participant Daily (Assessments Performed 4-24 Weeks After End of Treatment)

The severity of decreased/loss of sense of smell was reported by the participants using a 0 to 3 categorical scale (where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms), higher score indicated more severe symptoms. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28, Week 32, Week 36, Week 40, Week 44 and Week 48 (Post-baseline assessments performed 4-24 weeks after end of treatment)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48
Dupilumab 300 mg-1.45-1.36-1.07-0.83-0.74-0.71
Placebo-0.28-0.31-0.33-0.30-0.28-0.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Scores

The SNOT-22 is a validated questionnaire that was used to assess the impact of chronic rhinosinusitis phenotype with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). It is a 22 item questionnaire with each item assigned a score ranging from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score may range from 0 (no disease) to 110 (worst disease), lower scores representing better health related quality of life. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-9.31
Dupilumab 300 mg-30.43

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Rhinosinusitis

"The VAS for rhinosinusitis was used to evaluate the total disease severity. The participants were asked to indicate on a 10 centimeters (cm) VAS the answer to the question, How troublesome are your symptoms of your rhinosinusitis? The range of the VAS was from 0 (not troublesome) to 10 (worse thinkable troublesome), where higher score indicated worse thinkable troublesome. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates." (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventioncentimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.34
Dupilumab 300 mg-4.54

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score

NPS: sum of right, left nostril scores, evaluated by nasal endoscopy. For each nostril, NPS was graded based on polyp size from 0 = no polyps to 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction of inferior nasal cavity; lower score = smaller-sized polyps. Total NPS: sum of right and left nostril scores; ranges from 0 (no polyps) to 8 (large polyps), higher score = more severe disease. NPS was assessed by centralized, blinded, independent review of the nasal endoscopy video recordings. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.17
Dupilumab 300 mg-1.89

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow (NPIF)

NPIF evaluation represented a physiologic measure of the air flow through both nasal cavities during forced inspiration expressed in liters per minute. Higher NPIF values are indicative of better nasal air flow. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionliters per minute (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo14.09
Dupilumab 300 mg54.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Weeks 36 and 48 in 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test Scores (Assessments Performed 12 and 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)

The SNOT-22 is a validated questionnaire that was used to assess the impact of CRSwNP on HRQoL. It is a 22 item questionnaire with each item assigned a score ranging from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score may range from 0 (no disease) to 110 (worst disease), lower scores representing better health related quality of life. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 36 and Week 48 (Post-baseline assessments performed 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 36Week 48
Dupilumab 300 mg-20.87-17.66
Placebo-8.31-8.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity Score

NC symptom severity was assessed by the participants on a daily basis from Visit 1 and throughout the study using an e-diary on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms, with higher scores indicated more severity. Least squares (LS) means and standard error (SE) were obtained from Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.45
Dupilumab 300 mg-1.34

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion Symptom Severity Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery

NC symptom severity was assessed by the participants on a daily basis from Visit 1 and throughout the study using an e-diary on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms, with higher scores indicated more severity. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.52
Dupilumab 300 mg-1.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion Symptom Severity Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma

NC symptom severity was assessed by the participants on a daily basis from Visit 1 and throughout the study using an e-diary on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms, with higher scores indicated more severity. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.36
Dupilumab 300 mg-1.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) for Participants With Asthma

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.06
Dupilumab 300 mg0.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale Score

The EQ-5D was a standardized HRQoL questionnaire consisting of EQ-5D descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D descriptive system comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension had 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. EQ-VAS recorded the participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS that allowed them to indicate their health state that can range from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable). (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.74
Dupilumab 300 mg12.00

[back to top]

Rescue Treatment Use: Estimate of Percentage of Participants With >=1 Event by Week 48 Obtained Using Kaplan-Meier Method

"Rescue treatment was defined as usage of SCS or NP surgery (actual or planned) during the study. Rescue treatment included:~SCS: Betamethasone, dexamethasone, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, Hydrocortisone sodium succinate, methylprednisolone, prednisolone, prednisolone metasulfobenzoate sodium, prednisone, and triamcinolone.~Sino-nasal surgery for nasal polyps when there was worsening of signs and/or symptoms during the study.~Estimate of percentage of participants with event by Week 48 was obtained using Kaplan-Meier method." (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

,
Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
SCS treatmentNP surgery
Dupilumab 300 mg21.46.3
Placebo28.812.5

[back to top]

Rescue Treatment Use: Estimate of Percentage of Participants With >=1 Event by Week 24 Obtained Using Kaplan-Meier Method

"Rescue treatment was defined as usage of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) or NP surgery (actual or planned) during the treatment period. Rescue treatment included:~SCS: Betamethasone, dexamethasone, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, Hydrocortisone sodium succinate, methylprednisolone, prednisolone, prednisolone metasulfobenzoate sodium, prednisone, and triamcinolone.~Sino-nasal surgery for nasal polyps when there was worsening of signs and/or symptoms during the study.~Estimate of percentage of participants with event by Week 24 was obtained using Kaplan-Meier method." (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
SCS treatmentNP surgery
Dupilumab 300 mg6.52.1
Placebo18.97.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent And Treatment-Boosted Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response

ADA response were categorized as: treatment emergent and treatment boosted response. 1) Treatment emergent was defined as a positive response in the ADA assay post first dose, when baseline results are negative or missing. 2) Treatment boosted was defined as: An ADA positive response in the assay post first dose that is greater-than or equal to 4-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of study (Week 48)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
With treatment-emergent ADAWith treatment-boosted ADA
Dupilumab 300 mg220
Placebo70

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation

An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened in grade or became serious during TEAE period which was defined as the period from the time of first dose of study drug until 98 days following the last administration of study drug. Serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 98 days following the last administration of study drug (up to 36 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEAny treatment emergent SAETEAE leading to treatment discontinuation
Dupilumab 300 mg9365
Placebo93193

[back to top]

Functional Dupilumab Concentration in Serum

(NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, End of study (Week 48)

Interventionnanogram/milliliter (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 8Week 16Week 24Week 36Week 48
Dupilumab 300 mg0.0031267.1848306.7363958.1269224.11356.5339.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Weeks 36 and 48 in Visual Analog Scale for Rhinosinusitis (Assessments Performed 12 and 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)

"The VAS for rhinosinusitis was used to evaluate the total disease severity. The participants were asked to indicate on a 10 cm VAS the answer to the question, How troublesome are your symptoms of your rhinosinusitis? The range of the VAS was from 0 (not troublesome) to 10 (worse thinkable troublesome), where higher score indicated worse thinkable troublesome. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates." (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 36 and Week 48 (Post-baseline assessments performed 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment)

,
Interventioncentimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Week 36Week 48
Dupilumab 300 mg-3.02-2.42
Placebo-1.36-1.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Weeks 36 and 48 in Nasal Polyp Score (Assessments Performed 12 and 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)

NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores, as evaluated by means of nasal endoscopy. For each nostril, NPS was graded based on polyp size from 0 to 4 (0 = no polyps to 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity), with a lower score indicating smaller-sized polyps. Total NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyp) to 8 (large polyp), with highest score representing more severe disease. NPS was assessed by centralized, blinded, independent review of the nasal endoscopy video recordings. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. LS mean and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 36, Week 48 (post-baseline assessments performed 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 36Week 48
Dupilumab 300 mg-0.99-0.66
Placebo-0.060.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Severity of Decreased/Loss of Smell as Assessed by Participant Daily

The severity of decreased/loss of sense of smell was reported by the participants using a 0 to 3 categorical scale (where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms), higher score indicated more severe symptoms. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.29
Dupilumab 300 mg-1.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Rhinorrhea Daily Symptom Score

Rhinorrhea was reported by the participants using a 0 to 3 categorical scale (where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms), where higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.42
Dupilumab 300 mg-1.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) Scores for Participants With Asthma

ACQ-6 had 6 questions which assessed the most common asthma symptoms (woken by asthma, symptoms on waking, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheezing, puffs/inhalations use). Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to the symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 = no impairment to 6 = maximum impairment. The ACQ-6 score was the mean of the scores of all 6 questions and therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled), with higher scores indicated lower asthma control. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with the corresponding baseline value, treatment group, prior surgery, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.24
Dupilumab 300 mg-1.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 and 48 in Total Symptom Score (Assessments Performed 4-24 Weeks After End of Treatment)

The TSS was the sum of participant-assessed nasal symptom scores for NC/obstruction, decreased/loss of sense of smell, and rhinorrhea (anterior/posterior nasal discharge), each accessed on 0-3 categorical scale (where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms). Total score ranged from 0 (no symptoms) to 9 (severe symptoms). Higher score indicated more severe symptoms. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28, Week 32, Week 36, Week 40, Week 44 and Week 48 (Post-baseline assessments performed 4-24 weeks after end of treatment)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48
Dupilumab 300 mg-3.84-3.64-2.91-2.28-2.09-2.05
Placebo-1.18-1.25-1.31-1.27-1.20-1.28

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Total Symptom Score (TSS)

The TSS was the sum of participant-assessed nasal symptom scores for nasal congestion/obstruction, decreased/loss of sense of smell, and rhinorrhea (anterior/posterior nasal discharge), each accessed on 0-3 categorical scale (where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms). Total score ranged from 0 (no symptoms) to 9 (severe symptoms). Higher score indicated more severe symptoms. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.17
Dupilumab 300 mg-3.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 and 48 in Rhinorrhea Daily Symptom Score (Assessments Performed 4-24 Weeks After End of Treatment)

Rhinorrhea was reported by the participants using a 0 to 3 categorical scale (where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms), where higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28, Week 32, Week 36, Week 40, Week 44 and Week 48 (Post-baseline assessments performed 4-24 weeks after end of treatment)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48
Dupilumab 300 mg-1.04-0.97-0.80-0.63-0.58-0.58
Placebo-0.42-0.43-0.44-0.44-0.41-0.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 and 48 in Nasal Congestion Symptom Severity Score (Assessments Performed 4-24 Weeks After End of Treatment)

NC symptom severity was assessed by the participants on a daily basis from Visit 1 and throughout the study using an e-diary on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms, with higher scores indicated more severity. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28, Week 32, Week 36, Week 40, Week 44 and Week 48 (Post-baseline assessments performed 4-24 weeks after end of treatment)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48
Dupilumab 300 mg-1.36-1.33-1.05-0.83-0.77-0.77
Placebo-0.48-0.50-0.53-0.51-0.49-0.52

[back to top]

Total Systemic Corticosteroids Rescue Intake Duration: Average Duration Per Participant

Rescue treatment was defined as usage of SCS or NP surgery (actual or planned) during the treatment period. SCS rescue intake duration was defined as the duration (in days) from start of SCS rescue medication till the end of SCS rescue treatment. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventiondays (Mean)
Placebo11.04
Dupilumab 300 mg23.33

[back to top]

Mean Total Systemic Corticosteroids Rescue Dose Prescribed During Treatment Period

SCS included: Betamethasone, dexamethasone, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, hydrocortisone sodium succinate, methylprednisolone, prednisolone, prednisolone metasulfobenzoate sodium, prednisone, and triamcinolone. For every participant, total dose was calculated as (prescribed total daily dose*duration of SCS use). Then, mean of the total dose of 25 participants (placebo group) and 9 participants (Dupilumab group) was derived. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmilligrams (Mean)
Placebo366.07
Dupilumab 300 mg686.65

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 48 in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (Assessment Performed 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)

The UPSIT was a 40-item test to measure the individual's ability to detect odors. Total score ranges from 0 (anosmia) to 40 (normal sense of smell), lower score indicated severe smell loss. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48 (Post-baseline assessment performed 24 weeks after end of treatment)

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.21
Dupilumab 300 mg4.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund-Mackay Score (Assessment Performed 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)

The LMK scoring system rated each of both the left and right frontal, maxillary, sphenoid, ostiomeatal complex, anterior ethmoid and posterior ethmoid sinuses using following grading: 0 = normal, 1 = partial opacification, 2 = total opacification. The total score was the sum of scores from each side and ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified); higher score indicated more severe disease. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48 (Post-baseline assessment performed 24 weeks after end of treatment)

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.82
Dupilumab 300 mg-2.62

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) Score

The UPSIT was a 40-item test to measure the individual's ability to detect odors. Total score ranges from 0 (anosmia) to 40 (normal sense of smell), lower score indicated severe smell loss. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.70
Dupilumab 300 mg11.26

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second for Participants With Asthma (Assessment Performed 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48 (Post-baseline assessment performed 24 weeks after end of treatment)

Interventionliters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.11
Dupilumab 300 mg-0.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 Scores for Participants With Asthma (Assessment Performed 24 Weeks After End of Treatment)

ACQ-6 had 6 questions which assessed the most common asthma symptoms (woken by asthma, symptoms on waking, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheezing, puffs/inhalations use). Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to the symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 = no impairment to 6 = maximum impairment. The ACQ-6 score was the mean of the scores of all 6 questions and therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled), with higher scores indicated lower asthma control. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with the corresponding baseline value, treatment group, prior surgery, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48 (Post-baseline assessment performed 24 weeks after end of treatment)

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.09
Dupilumab 300 mg-0.55

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund-Mackay (LMK) Score

The LMK scoring system rated each of both the left and right frontal, maxillary, sphenoid, ostiomeatal complex, anterior ethmoid and posterior ethmoid sinuses using following grading: 0 = normal, 1 = partial opacification, 2 = total opacification. The total score was the sum of scores from each side and ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified); higher score indicated more severe disease. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. NOTE: For Japan regulatory submission only, this endpoint is not included as a secondary outcome measure and is instead one of the co-primary outcome measures. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.74
Dupilumab 300 mg-8.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery

The LMK scoring system rated each of both the left and right frontal, maxillary, sphenoid, ostiomeatal complex, anterior ethmoid and posterior ethmoid sinuses using following grading: 0 = normal, 1 = partial opacification, 2 = total opacification. The total score was the sum of scores from each side and ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified); higher score indicated more severe disease. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, asthma/NSAID-ERD status, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.39
Dupilumab 300 mg-7.60

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma

The LMK scoring system rated each of both the left and right frontal, maxillary, sphenoid, ostiomeatal complex, anterior ethmoid and posterior ethmoid sinuses using following grading: 0 = normal, 1 = partial opacification, 2 = total opacification. The total score was the sum of scores from each side and ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified); higher score indicated more severe disease. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. The imputed completed data were analyzed by fitting an ANCOVA model with corresponding baseline, treatment group, prior surgery history, and regions as covariates. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.15
Dupilumab 300 mg-7.97

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score: Subgroup of Participants With Prior Nasal Polyp Surgery

NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores, as evaluated by means of nasal endoscopy. For each nostril, NPS was graded from 0 to 4 (0 = no polyps to 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity), with a lower score indicating smaller-sized polyps. Total NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyp) to 8 (large polyp), with highest score representing more severe disease. NPS was assessed by centralized, blinded, independent review of the nasal endoscopy video recordings. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. LS mean and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.14
Dupilumab 300 mg-1.86

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score: Subgroup of Participants With Asthma

NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores, as evaluated by means of nasal endoscopy. For each nostril, NPS was graded from 0 to 4 (0 = no polyps to 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity), with a lower score indicating smaller-sized polyps. Total NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyp) to 8 (large polyp), with highest score representing more severe disease. NPS was assessed by centralized, blinded, independent review of the nasal endoscopy video recordings. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. LS mean and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model. (NCT02912468)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.27
Dupilumab 300 mg-1.89

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Nasal Surgery Over Time

The percentage of participants with nasal surgery over time (by Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 52) was derived from Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analyses for the event 'first nasal surgery'. Nasal surgery was defined as any procedure involving instruments resulting in incision and removal of tissue (polypectomy) in the nasal cavity. Time to first nasal surgery was defined as (Date of first nasal surgery - Date of first dose of study treatment) + 1. Percentage of participants with nasal surgery over time (by Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 52) and corresponding 95% CI have been presented, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Analysis included surgeries occurring up to Week 52, reported on-treatment and those reported after early discontinuation from IP by participants who remained in the study. (NCT03085797)
Timeframe: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 52

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 8Week 16Week 24Week 32Week 40Week 48Week 52
Mepolizumab 100 mg SC0.51.04.06.07.69.29.2
Placebo1.03.59.114.218.922.023.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Requiring at Least One Course of Systemic Steroids for Nasal Polyps up to Week 52

The number of courses of systemic steroids received by participants were recorded. For the purpose of this study, a course of systemic corticosteroid separated by less than 7 days was considered as a continuation of the same course. Percentage of participants requiring at least one course of systemic steroids for nasal polyps up to Week 52 is presented. Data up to Week 52, including from participants who remained in the study after early discontinuation from IP, were included in analysis. (NCT03085797)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo37
Mepolizumab 100 mg SC25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Composite VAS Score (Combining VAS Scores for Nasal Obstruction, Nasal Discharge, Mucus in the Throat and Loss of Smell) During the 4 Weeks Prior to Week 52

Participants rated individual (nasal obstruction, nasal discharge, mucus in the throat, loss of smell, facial pain) and overall symptoms on a visual analog scale using an eDiary. Captured scores ranged between 0 (none) and 100 (as bad as you can imagine), final scores derived from electronically captured scores by dividing by 10. The composite VAS score was calculated as average of individual scores of nasal obstruction, nasal discharge, mucus in the throat and loss of smell and ranged between 0 and 10, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Data up to Week 52, including from participants who remained in the study after early discontinuation from IP, were included in analysis. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and data is presented for Weeks 49-52. Baseline was defined as the average score from the 7 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. (NCT03085797)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 49 to 52

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Placebo-0.89
Mepolizumab 100 mg SC-3.96

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 Total Score at Week 52

"The SNOT-22 is a 22-item self-reported questionnaire developed to measure symptoms and impacts related to chronic rhinosinusitis. The 22 questions are self-completed by participants based on their recall of their symptoms over the previous 2 weeks using a 6-point rating scale (0 = Not present/no problem; 1 = Very mild problem; 2 = Mild or slight problem; 3 = Moderate problem; 4 = Severe problem; 5 = Problem as bad as it can be). Scores for each question are summed to derive the total score. The SNOT-22 total score ranges from 0 to 110, with higher scores representing worse quality of life. Data up to Week 52, including from participants who remained in the study after early discontinuation from IP, were included in analysis. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value." (NCT03085797)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Placebo-14.0
Mepolizumab 100 mg SC-30.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall VAS Score During the 4 Weeks Prior to Week 52

Participants rated individual (nasal obstruction, nasal discharge, mucus in the throat, loss of smell, facial pain) and overall symptoms on a visual analog scale using an eDiary. Captured scores ranged between 0 (none) and 100 (as bad as you can imagine), final scores derived from the electronically captured scores by dividing by 10. The final overall VAS score ranged between 0 and 10, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Data up to Week 52, including from participants who remained in the study after early discontinuation from IP, were included in analysis. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and data is presented for Weeks 49-52. Baseline was defined as the average score from the 7 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. (NCT03085797)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 49 to 52

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Placebo-0.90
Mepolizumab 100 mg SC-4.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Nasal Obstruction Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score During the 4 Weeks Prior to Week 52

Participants rated individual (nasal obstruction, nasal discharge, mucus in the throat, loss of smell, facial pain) and overall symptoms on a visual analog scale (VAS) using an electronic diary (eDiary). Captured scores ranged between 0 (none) and 100 (as bad as you can imagine), final scores derived from the electronically captured scores by dividing by 10. The final nasal obstruction VAS score ranged between 0 and 10, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Data up to Week 52, including from participants who remained in the study after early discontinuation from IP, were included in analysis. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and data is presented for Weeks 49-52. Baseline was defined as the average score from the 7 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. (NCT03085797)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 49 to 52

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Placebo-0.82
Mepolizumab 100 mg SC-4.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Nasal Polyps Score at Week 52

Independent reviewers, blinded to treatment, reviewed image recordings of nasal endoscopies to determine total endoscopic NP score based on NP size. The right and left nostrils were scored from 0 to 4 (0 = No polyps; 1 = Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha; 2 = Polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle concha; and 4 = Large polyps causing complete obstruction/congestion of the inferior meatus). The total score is the sum of the right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 to 8, higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Data up to Week 52, including from participants who remained in the study after early discontinuation from IP, were included in analysis. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. (NCT03085797)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Placebo0.0
Mepolizumab 100 mg SC-1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Individual VAS Symptom Score: Loss of Smell During the 4 Weeks Prior to Week 52

Participants rated individual (nasal obstruction, nasal discharge, mucus in the throat, loss of smell, facial pain) and overall symptoms on a visual analog scale using an eDiary. Captured scores ranged between 0 (none) and 100 (as bad as you can imagine), final scores derived from the electronically captured scores by dividing by 10. The final loss of smell VAS score ranged between 0 and 10, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Data up to Week 52, including from participants who remained in the study after early discontinuation from IP, were included in analysis. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and data is presented for Weeks 49-52. Baseline was defined as the average score from the 7 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. (NCT03085797)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 49 to 52

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Placebo0.00
Mepolizumab 100 mg SC-0.53

[back to top]

Total Number of Courses of SCS for NP

The total number of courses of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) use for nasal polyposis (NP) was summarized using descriptive statistics. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

Interventionnumber of courses (Mean)
Benra 30 mg1.7
Placebo1.6

[back to top]

Total Duration of SCS_NP (Days)

The total duration of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) for nasal polyposis (NP) in days was summarized using descriptive statistics. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

Interventiondays (Mean)
Benra 30 mg17.6
Placebo20.1

[back to top]

Time to the First NP Surgery up to Week 56

The cumulative percentage and the corresponding 95% CI are based on the Kaplan-Meier estimates. Patients can have more than 1 rescue category during the study, and the first rescue per patient is considered. The time to first nasal polyposis (NP) surgery up to week 56 was calculated based on the earliest occurrence of NP surgery and was calculated as follows: Time to first NP surgery=Start date of first NP surgery - date of randomization + 1. For patients who did not experience any surgery, the time to event was censored at earlier of (date of their week 56 visit, date of discontinuation). (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

Interventionmonths (Number)
Benra 30 mg16.6
Placebo19.5

[back to top]

Time to First SCS_NP up to Week 56

The cumulative percentage and the corresponding 95% CI are based on the Kaplan-Meier estimates. Patients can have more than 1 rescue category during the study, and the first rescue per patient is considered. The time to first systemic corticosteroids for use for nasal polyposis (SCS_NP) up to week 56 was calculated based on the earliest occurrence of SCS_ NP and was calculated as follows: Time to first SCS_NP = Earlier of (Start date of first SCS use for NP) - date of randomization + 1. For patients who did not experience any SCS use for NP, the time to event was censored at earlier of (date of their week 56 visit, date of discontinuation). The time to first SCS use for NP surgery was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model with treatment arm, region (US vs non-US) and baseline comorbid asthma status (yes vs no) as covariates. A hazard ratio less than 1 indicates a lower rate of incidence for subjects on benra. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

Interventionmonths (Number)
Benra 30 mg25.7
Placebo33.5

[back to top]

Time to First NP Surgery and/or SCS Use for NP to Week 56

The cumulative percentage and the corresponding 95% CI are based on the Kaplan-Meier estimates. Patients can have more than 1 rescue category during the study, and the first rescue per patient is considered. The time to first nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids (SCS) use for NP up to week 56 was calculated based on the earliest occurrence of NP surgery and/or SCS use for NP and was calculated as follows: Time to first NP surgery and/or SCS use for NP = Earlier of (Start date of first NP surgery, Start date of first SCS use for NP) - date of randomization + 1. For patients who did not experience any surgery or SCS use for NP, the time to event was censored at earlier of (date of their week 56 visit, date of discontinuation). (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

Interventionmonths (Number)
Benra 30 mg35.5
Placebo46.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With SCS_NP

The percentage of patients who had systemic corticosteroids (SCS) use for nasal polyposis (NP) surgery up to week 56 was summarized and analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by region (US vs non-US) and baseline comorbid asthma status (yes vs no). (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Benra 30 mg52
Placebo66

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Difficulty With Daily Activities Due to Nasal Symptoms at Week 40

Change from baseline in difficulty with daily activities due to nasal symptoms score at week 40 was defined as the endpoint at week 40 minus baseline value. The score was captured by an item in NPSD. The severity of difficulty with daily activities due to nasal symptoms over the past 24 hours was rated using options: 0-none; 1-mild; 2-moderate; 3-severe. The score and change from baseline were summarized every two weeks (bi-weekly). Baseline was average of daily responses from Day -13 to Day 1. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for nasal polyposis (SCS_NP) were set to missing. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. In ANCOVA, a hybrid method of the WP after NP surgery, WOCF after SCS_NP and multiple imputation (MI) assuming MAR were used to build the complete imputation datasets for the analysis. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 40

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-0.35
Placebo-0.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total NPS at Week 40

Change from baseline in total nasal polyps score (NPS) at week 40 was defined as the endpoint value at week 40 minus the baseline value. The total NPS was the sum of the right and left nostril scores and maximum total NPS is 8, as evaluated by nasal endoscopy and the left and right score were based on central read with scale from 0 to 4 where higher score reflects heavier bilateral nasal polyp burden. Baseline was the last valid value on or prior to the date of randomization. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. In ANCOVA, a hybrid method of WP after NP surgery, WOCF after SCS_NP and multiple imputation (MI) assuming missing at random were used to build the complete imputation datasets for the analysis. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 40

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-0.36
Placebo0.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Physical Component Summary at Week 56

Change from baseline in SF-36v2 physical component summary (PCS) at week 56 was defined as the endpoint value at week 56 minus the baseline value. The Short Form 36-item Health survey (SF-36v2) is a 36-item, self-report survey of functional health and wellbeing, with 4-week recall period. Responses to SF-36v2 were used to compute an 8-domain profile of functional health and well-being scores. PCS score is computed from 8 subscale scores to give a broader metric of physical health-related quality of life. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. Non-rescued patients whose post-baseline observations were all missing were excluded from this analysis. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-1.557
Placebo-3.185

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Physical Functioning at Week 56

Change from baseline in SF-36v2 physical functioning score at week 56 was defined as the endpoint value at week 56 minus the baseline value. The Short Form 36-item Health survey (SF-36v2) is a 36-item, self-report survey of functional health and wellbeing, with 4-week recall period. Responses to SF-36v2 were used to compute an 8-domain profile of functional health and well-being scores. Physical functioning is one of the 8-domain profile. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. Non-rescued patients whose post-baseline observations were all missing were excluded from this analysis. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg0.080
Placebo-0.911

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SNOT-22 at Week 56

Change from baseline in SinoNasal outcome test (SNOT-22) at week 56 was defined as the endpoint value at week 56 minus the baseline value. The SNOT-22 is a condition specific health-related quality of life assessment which captures patient-reported physical problems, functional limitations, and emotional consequences of sinonasal conditions. The total score is range from 0 to 110 (higher scores indicate poorer outcomes). Baseline was the last valid value on or prior to the date of randomization. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. In ANCOVA, a hybrid method of WP after NP surgery, WOCF after SCS_NP and multiple imputation (MI) assuming missing at random were used to build the complete imputation datasets for the analysis. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-15.1
Placebo-7.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems at Week 56

Change from baseline in SF-36v2 role limitations due to emotional problems score at week 56 was defined as the endpoint value at week 56 minus the baseline value. The Short Form 36-item Health survey (SF-36v2) is a 36-item, self-report survey of functional health and wellbeing, with 4-week recall period. Responses to SF-36v2 were used to compute an 8-domain profile of functional health and well-being scores. Role limitations due to emotional problems is one of the 8-domain profile. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. Non-rescued patients whose post-baseline observations were all missing were excluded from this analysis. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-0.492
Placebo-1.825

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Role Limitations Due to Physical Health at Week 56

Change from baseline in SF-36v2 role limitations due to physical health score at week 56 was defined as the endpoint value at week 56 minus the baseline value. The Short Form 36-item Health survey (SF-36v2) is a 36-item, self-report survey of functional health and wellbeing, with 4-week recall period. Responses to SF-36v2 were used to compute an 8-domain profile of functional health and well-being scores. Role limitations due to physical health is one of the 8-domain profile. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. Non-rescued patients whose post-baseline observations were all missing were excluded from this analysis. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg1.576
Placebo0.025

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Social Functioning at Week 56

Change from baseline in SF-36v2 social functioning score at week 56 was defined as the endpoint value at week 56 minus the baseline value. The Short Form 36-item Health survey (SF-36v2) is a 36-item, self-report survey of functional health and wellbeing, with 4-week recall period. Responses to SF-36v2 are used to compute an 8-domain profile of functional health and well-being scores. Social functioning is one of the 8-domain profile. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. Non-rescued patients whose post-baseline observations were all missing were excluded from this analysis. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg0.262
Placebo-1.247

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Vitality at Week 56

Change from baseline in SF-36v2 vitality score at week 56 was defined as the endpoint value at week 56 minus the baseline value. The Short Form 36-item Health survey (SF-36v2) is a 36-item, self-report survey of functional health and wellbeing, with 4-week recall period. Responses to SF-36v2 were used to compute an 8-domain profile of functional health and well-being scores. Vitality is one of the 8-domain profile. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. Non-rescued patients whose post-baseline observations were all missing were excluded from this analysis. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg1.913
Placebo-0.594

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SNOT-22 at Week 40

Change from baseline in SinoNasal outcome test (SNOT-22) at week 40 was defined as the endpoint value at week 40 minus the baseline value. The SNOT-22 is a condition specific health-related quality of life assessment which captures patient-reported physical problems, functional limitations, and emotional consequences of sinonasal conditions. The total score is the sum of item scores and has a range from 0 to 110 (higher scores indicate poorer outcomes). Baseline was the last valid value on or prior to the date of randomization. Data collected after NP surgery and/or SCS_NP were set to missing. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. In ANCOVA, a hybrid method of WP after NP surgery, WOCF after SCS_NP and multiple imputation (MI) assuming missing at random were used to build the complete imputation datasets for the analysis. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 40

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-15.2
Placebo-10.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in DSS at Week 40

Change from baseline in difficulty with sense of smell (DSS) at week 40 was defined as the endpoint value at week 40 minus the baseline value. The DSS is captured by an item in the NPSD. Severity of worst difficulty with sense of smell over the past 24 hours was rated with response options: 0-none; 1-mild; 2-moderate; 3-severe. The DSS and the changes from baseline were summarized every two weeks (bi-weekly). Baseline was the average of daily responses from Day -13 to Day 1. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids use for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. In ANCOVA, a hybrid method of WP after NP surgery, WOCF after SCS_NP and multiple imputation (MI) assuming missing at random were used to build the complete imputation datasets for the analysis. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 40

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-0.34
Placebo-0.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Difficulty With Sleeping Due to Nasal Symptoms at Week 40

Change from baseline in difficulty with sleeping due to nasal symptoms score at week 40 was defined as the endpoint at week 40 minus baseline value. The score was captured by an item in NPSD. The severity of difficulty with sleeping due to nasal symptoms over past 24 hours was rated using options: 0-none; 1-mild; 2-moderate; 3-severe. The score and change from baseline were summarized every two weeks (bi-weekly). Baseline was the average of daily responses from Day -13 to Day 1. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for nasal polyposis (SCS_NP) were set to missing. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. In ANCOVA, a hybrid method of the WP after NP surgery, WOCF after SCS_NP and multiple imputation (MI) assuming missing at random were used to build the complete imputation datasets for the analysis (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 40

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-0.39
Placebo-0.19

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sinus Severity Score at EOT/IPD

Change from baseline in sinus severity score at end of treatment (EOT)/investigational product discontinuation (IPD) was defined as the endpoint value at EOT/IPD minus the baseline value. Quantitative assessment of sinus CT image data was used to derive an objective measure of sinus disease burden called sinus severity score. The sinus severity score is defined as (sinus mucosal volume)/(sinus mucosal volume + sinus air volume)×100. A composite strategy was used for NP surgery. If a patient had NP surgery before EOT/IPD CT scan, the data was censored after the time of the first NP surgery and the worst possible value (WP) was imputed in its place. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the WP for NP surgery rescued subjects was applied. In ANCOVA, following WP (WP for NP surgery rescued subjects), model included treatment, baseline score, region (US/Non-US) and baseline comorbid asthma status. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT/IPD, up to 56 weeks

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-3.48
Placebo0.79

[back to top]

Annual SCS_NP Use Rate Comparison by Period, Negative Binomial Model

Annual systemic corticosteroids for nasal polyposis (SCS_NP) use rate =365.25×total number of courses of SCS_NP /total duration of follow-up within the treatment group (days). The estimated annual event rates, absolute differences, rate ratio and the corresponding confidence interval were based on a negative binomial model including covariates treatment group, region (US/non-US) and prior use of SCS_NP with total number of courses of SCS_NP as the outcome and the log of each subject's corresponding follow-up time up to week 56 as an offset variable in the model to adjust for subject's having different exposure times during which the events occur. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

Interventionnumber of courses for each patient (Mean)
Benra 30 mg0.40
Placebo0.50

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With NP Surgery or SCS_NP

The percentage of patients who had nasal polyposis (NP) surgery or systemic corticosteroids use for nasal polyposis (SCS_NP) surgery up to week 56 was summarized and analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by region (US vs non-US) and baseline comorbid asthma status (yes vs no). (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Benra 30 mg72
Placebo91

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With NP Surgery

The percentage of patients who had nasal polyposis (NP) surgery or systemic corticosteroids use for nasal polyposis (SCS_NP) surgery up to week 56 was summarized and analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by region (US vs non-US) and baseline comorbid asthma status (yes vs no). (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Benra 30 mg33
Placebo37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in UPSIT Score in Males at Week 40

Change from baseline in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) score at week 40 was defined as the endpoint value at week 40 minus the baseline value. The UPSIT is quantitative test of olfactory function. Scores were based on number of correctly identified odors (score range 0 to 40). Baseline was the last valid value on or prior to the date of randomization. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for nasal polyposis (SCS_NP) were set to missing. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. In ANCOVA, a hybrid method of the WP after NP surgery, WOCF after SCS_NP and multiple imputation (MI) assuming missing at random were used to build the complete imputation datasets for the analysis. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 40

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-0.20
Placebo0.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in UPSIT Score in Females at Week 40

Change from baseline in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) score at week 40 was defined as the endpoint value at week 40 minus the baseline value. The UPSIT is quantitative test of olfactory function. Scores are based on number of correctly identified odors (score range 0 to 40). Baseline was the last valid value on or prior to the date of randomization. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for nasal polyposis (SCS_NP) were set to missing. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. In ANCOVA, a hybrid method of the WP after NP surgery, WOCF after SCS_NP and multiple imputation (MI) assuming missing at random were used to build the complete imputation datasets for the analysis. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 40

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg1.66
Placebo-1.32

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in DSS at Week 56

Change from baseline in difficulty with sense of smell (DSS) at week 56 was defined as the endpoint value at week 56 minus the baseline value. The DSS is captured by an item in the NPSD with response options: 0-none; 1-mild; 2-moderate; 3-severe to rate the severity of their worst difficulty with sense of smell over past 24 hours. The DSS and the changes from baseline were summarized every two weeks (bi-weekly). Baseline was the average of daily responses from Day -13 to Day 1. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. In ANCOVA, a hybrid method of WP after NP surgery, WOCF after SCS_NP and multiple imputation (MI) assuming missing at random were used to build the complete imputation datasets for the analysis. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-0.39
Placebo-0.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in LMS at EOT/IPD

Change from baseline in Computed tomography (CT) Lund Mackay Score (LMS) at end of treatment (EOT)/investigational product discontinuation (IPD) was defined as the endpoint value at EOT/IPD minus the baseline value. The LMS evaluates the patency using a 0-2 scale (0-normal; 1-partial opacification; and 2-total opacification) of each sinus (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, frontal sinus on each side). The osteomeatal complex is graded as 0- not occluded or 2-occluded. The total CT score is the sum of the scores from all the sinus and ranges from 0 to 24. The minimum is 0 and higher score indicates worse outcome. The analysis used the data collected after systemic corticosteroids for nasal polyposis (SCS_NP). A composite strategy was used for NP surgery. If a patient had NP surgery before EOT/IPD CT scan, the data was censored after the time of the first NP surgery and the worst possible value (WP) was imputed in its place. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT/IPD, up to 56 weeks

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-0.93
Placebo-0.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in NBS at Week 40

Change from baseline in nasal blockage score (NBS) at week 40 was defined as the endpoint value at week 40 minus the baseline value. The NBS was captured by an item in NPSD. Patients were asked to rate the severity of their worst nasal blockage over the past 24 hours using the following response options: 0-none; 1-mild; 2-moderate; 3-severe. The NBS and the changes from baseline were summarized every two weeks (bi-weekly). Baseline was the average of daily responses from Day -13 to Day 1. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. In ANCOVA, a hybrid method of the WP after NP surgery, WOCF after SCS_NP and multiple imputation (MI) assuming missing at random were used to build the complete imputation datasets for the analysis. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 40

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-0.68
Placebo-0.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in NBS at Week 56

Change from baseline in nasal blockage score (NBS) at week 56 was defined as the endpoint value at week 56 minus the baseline value. The NBS is captured by an item in the NPSD. Patients were asked to rate the severity of their worst nasal blockage over the past 24 hours using the following response options: 0-none; 1-mild; 2-moderate; 3-severe. The NBS and the changes from baseline were summarized every two weeks (bi-weekly). Baseline was the average of daily responses from Day -13 to Day 1. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. In ANCOVA, a hybrid method of WP after NP surgery, WOCF after SCS_NP and multiple imputation (MI) assuming missing at random were used to build the complete imputation datasets for the analysis. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-0.68
Placebo-0.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in NPS at Week 56

Change from baseline in total nasal polyps score (NPS) at week 56 was defined as the endpoint value at week 56 minus the baseline value. The total NPS is the sum of the right and left nostril scores, as evaluated by nasal endoscopy and the left and right score are based on central read with scale from 0 to 4 where higher score reflects heavier bilateral nasal polyp burden. Baseline was the last valid value on or prior to the date of randomization. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. In ANCOVA, a hybrid method of WP after NP surgery, WOCF after SCS_NP and multiple imputation (MI) assuming missing at random were used to build the complete imputation datasets for the analysis. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-0.22
Placebo0.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Bodily Pain at Week 56

Change from baseline in SF-36v2 bodily pain score at week 56 was defined as the endpoint value at week 56 minus the baseline value. The Short Form 36-item Health survey (SF-36v2) is a 36-item, self-report survey of functional health and wellbeing, with 4-week recall period. Responses to SF-36v2 were used to compute an 8-domain profile of functional health and well-being scores. Bodily pain is one of the 8-domain profile. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. Non-rescued patients whose post-baseline observations were all missing were excluded from this analysis. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg0.982
Placebo-1.066

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 General Health Perceptions at Week 56

Change from baseline in SF-36v2 general health perceptions score at week 56 was defined as the endpoint value at week 56 minus the baseline value. The Short Form 36-item Health survey (SF-36v2) is a 36-item, self-report survey of functional health and wellbeing, with 4-week recall period. Responses to SF-36v2 were used to compute an 8-domain profile of functional health and well-being scores. General health perceptions is one of the 8-domain profile. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. Non-rescued patients whose post-baseline observations were all missing are excluded from this analysis. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg0.445
Placebo-1.064

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Mental Component Summary at Week 56

Change from baseline in SF-36v2 mental component summary (MCS) at week 56 was defined as the endpoint value at week 56 minus the baseline value. The Short Form 36-item Health survey (SF-36v2) is a 36-item, self-report survey of functional health and wellbeing, with 4-week recall period. Responses to SF-36v2 were used to compute an 8-domain profile of functional health and well-being scores. MCS score is computed from 8 subscale scores to give a broader metric of mental health-related quality of life. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. Non-rescued patients whose post-baseline observations were all missing were excluded from this analysis. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-2.263
Placebo-4.182

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Mental Health at Week 56

Change from baseline in SF-36v2 mental health score at week 56 was defined as the endpoint value at week 56 minus the baseline value. The Short Form 36-item Health survey (SF-36v2) is a 36-item, self-report survey of functional health and wellbeing, with 4-week recall period. Responses to SF-36v2 were used to compute an 8-domain profile of functional health and well-being scores. Mental health is one of the 8-domain profile. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for NP (SCS_NP) were set to missing. Non-rescued patients whose post-baseline observations were all missing were excluded from this analysis. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-1.506
Placebo-3.308

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in TSS at Week 40

Change from baseline in total symptom score (TSS) at week 40 was defined as the endpoint at week 40 minus baseline value. The TSS is defined as sum of first 8 NPSD components. Severity of each nasal symptoms over the past 24 hours is rated using response options: 0-none; 1-mild; 2-moderate; 3-severe. The TSS and the change from baseline were summarized every two weeks (bi-weekly). Baseline was the average of daily TSS responses from Day -13 to Day 1. Data collected after nasal polyposis (NP) surgery and/or systemic corticosteroids for nasal polyposis (SCS_NP) were set to missing. In calculation of summary statistics (mean and standard deviation), the worst-possible (WP) after NP surgery and worst-observation carried forward (WOCF) after SCS_NP were applied. In ANCOVA, a hybrid method of the WP after NP surgery, WOCF after SCS_NP and multiple imputation (MI) assuming MAR were used to build the complete imputation datasets for the analysis. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 40

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Benra 30 mg-3.20
Placebo-1.38

[back to top]

Total SCS_NP Dose (a) Used (mg)

The total systemic corticosteroids (SCS) for nasal polyposis (NP) dose used (mg) was summarized using descriptive statistics. (NCT03401229)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 56

Interventionmilligrams (Mean)
Benra 30 mg1083.2
Placebo435.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) Score at Week 16

SNOT-22 is a 22-item outcome measure on a 5-category scale that assesses symptoms and social/emotional consequences of rhinosinusitis. Each item is scored from 0 (No problem at all) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be), and the total score ranges from 0 to 110. Higher SNOT-22 scores are indicative of greater impact of rhinosinusitis on quality of life. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT03614923)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4W-22.97
Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8W-18.34
Placebo-16.32

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Eosinophil Count

(NCT03614923)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16, and Week 24

,,
Intervention10^9 cells/L (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 16Change from Baseline at Week 24
Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4W0.437-0.162-0.038
Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8W0.350-0.117-0.029
Placebo0.434-0.0200.019

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) to Week 16

"Nasal polyps were evaluated by nasal endoscopy using centralized imaging data assessments scored by an independent reviewer.~Each nostril was scored on a scale from 0 to 4, where a score of 0 means no polyps, and a score of 4 means the presence of polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity.~The bilateral NPS score is the sum of the right and left nostril scores, and hence the total NPS value is between 0 and 8 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement." (NCT03614923)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4W-0.87
Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8W-0.89
Placebo-0.49

[back to top]

Change in Nasal Endoscopic Findings Using the Lund-Kennedy Grading System

"A board-certified otolaryngologist will perform a nasal endoscopic examination pre- and post-intervention and findings recorded using the Lund-Kennedy grading system.~The The Lund Kennedy System grades the pathologic state of the nasal cavity based on the presence of polyps, nasal discharge, and mucosal edema.~Polyps graded from 0 to 2 (0=absent, 1=limited to middle meatus, 2=extending to nasal cavity) Discharge graded from 0 to 2 (0=absent, 1=thin/clear, 2=thick) Edema graded from 0 to 2 (0=absent, 1=mild/moderate, 2=polypoid degeneration). Scores are added for each side of the nose with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 12 with higher scores indicating more severe sinonasal inflammation." (NCT03705793)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline to Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Irrigation2.2
Mometasone Nasal Spray2.1

[back to top]

Change in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test Scores (SNOT-22)

"The change in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test scores (SNOT-22) scores pre- and post-treatment between the two arms was measured. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test asks subjects to rate how bad their rhinosinusitis is by using a 0-5 point scale with 0=no problem, 1=very mild problem, 2=mild or slight problem, 3=moderate problem, 4=severe problem, 5=problem as bad as it can be. The SNOT includes 22 questions (symptoms and social/emotional consequences of rhinosinusitis), each of which are rated from 0 to 5 for a minimum score of 0 to maximum score of 110, with higher scores representing worse outcome.~All relevant time points used in the calculation in the Time Frame (e.g., 'baseline and 8 weeks)" (NCT03705793)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline to Week 8

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Irrigation23.18
Mometasone Nasal Spray17.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Score <3 on the Clinical Global Impression Scale

CGI asks subjects to rate their overall response to treatment using a 7-point Likert scale with anchors of 1=very much improved, 4=no change, and 7=very much worse. (NCT03705793)
Timeframe: Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Irrigation22
Mometasone Nasal Spray20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the TNSS At Day 15 (Physician-Evaluated)

TNSS evaluated participant nasal symptoms of discharge (rhinorrhea), stuffiness, sneezing, and itching. The 4 individual symptom scores were rated by the physician at the visit as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. TNSS was the sum of the 4 individual symptom scores (range= 0-12, higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms). For each participant, individual scores were totaled and used to calculate the change from Baseline in TNSS at the visit. Participant changes were then used to calculate the mean change for each treatment group at that visit. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Day 15

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 15
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)7.9-3.8
Mometasone Furoate (MF)8.3-3.3
Placebo8.4-2.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) (Average of Morning [AM]/Evening [PM] Score) Averaged Over Days 1 to 15 (Participant-Evaluated)

TNSS evaluated participant nasal symptoms of discharge (rhinorrhea), stuffiness, sneezing, and itching, as rated in their diary in the morning (AM) and evening (PM). The 4 individual symptom scores rated as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. TNSS was the sum of the 4 individual symptom scores (range= 0-12, higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms). For the 15 day interval, participant individual daily scores were totaled and averaged over interval (AM and PM computed separately then averaged) and used to calculate the overall average change from Baseline. Participant average changes were then used to calculate the mean change for each arm for the interval. Average change from Baseline for Days 1-15 = average post-treatment score (Days 1-15) - Baseline average score (average of the Baseline AM/PM diary scores from 3 consecutive days prior to Baseline visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Days 1 through 15 (average of 15 days of treatment)

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline Days 1-15
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)7.3-2.8
Mometasone Furoate (MF)7.6-2.3
Placebo7.6-1.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the TNSS At Day 8 (Physician-Evaluated)

TNSS evaluated participant nasal symptoms of discharge (rhinorrhea), stuffiness, sneezing, and itching. The 4 individual symptom scores were rated by the physician at the visit as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. TNSS was the sum of the 4 individual symptom scores (range= 0-12, higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms). For each participant, individual scores were totaled and used to calculate the change from Baseline in TNSS at the visit. Participant changes were then used to calculate the mean change for each treatment group at that visit. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Day 8

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 8
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)7.9-3.8
Mometasone Furoate (MF)8.3-3.3
Placebo8.4-1.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the TNSS At Day 4 (Physician-Evaluated)

TNSS evaluated participant nasal symptoms of discharge (rhinorrhea), stuffiness, sneezing, and itching. The 4 individual symptom scores were rated by the physician at the visit as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. TNSS was the sum of the 4 individual symptom scores (range= 0-12, higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms). For each participant, individual scores were totaled and used to calculate the change from Baseline in TNSS at the visit. Participant changes were then used to calculate the mean change for each treatment group at that visit. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Day 4

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 4
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)7.9-2.7
Mometasone Furoate (MF)8.3-2.4
Placebo8.4-1.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the TNSS At Day 29 (Physician-Evaluated)

TNSS evaluated participant nasal symptoms of discharge (rhinorrhea), stuffiness, sneezing, and itching. The 4 individual symptom scores were rated by the physician at the visit as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. TNSS was the sum of the 4 individual symptom scores (range= 0-12, higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms). For each participant, individual scores were totaled and used to calculate the change from Baseline in TNSS at the visit. Participant changes were then used to calculate the mean change for each treatment group at that visit. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Day 29

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 29
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)7.9-4.6
Mometasone Furoate (MF)8.3-4.1
Placebo8.4-3.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the TNSS At Day 22 (Physician-Evaluated)

TNSS evaluated participant nasal symptoms of discharge (rhinorrhea), stuffiness, sneezing, and itching. The 4 individual symptom scores were rated by the physician at the visit as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. TNSS was the sum of the 4 individual symptom scores (range= 0-12, higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms). For each participant, individual scores were totaled and used to calculate the change from Baseline in TNSS at the visit. Participant changes were then used to calculate the mean change for each treatment group at that visit. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Day 22

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 22
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)7.9-4.0
Mometasone Furoate (MF)8.3-3.9
Placebo8.4-3.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 8 (Physician-Evaluated)

Overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis was evaluated by the physician during the visit and scored on a scale from 0 to 3 as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. A higher score indicated more frequent/severe nasal symptoms. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Day 8

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 8
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.2-0.8
Mometasone Furoate (MF)2.3-0.7
Placebo2.2-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 22 (Physician-Evaluated)

Overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis was evaluated by the physician during the visit and scored on a scale from 0 to 3 as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. A higher score indicated more frequent/severe nasal symptoms. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Day 22

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 22
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.2-0.8
Mometasone Furoate (MF)2.3-0.9
Placebo2.2-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 4 (Physician-Evaluated)

Overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis was evaluated by the physician during the visit and scored on a scale from 0 to 3 as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. A higher score indicated more frequent/severe nasal symptoms. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Day 4

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 4
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.2-0.5
Mometasone Furoate (MF)2.3-0.6
Placebo2.2-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 4 (Participant-Evaluated)

Overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis was evaluated by the participant during the visit and scored on a scale from 0 to 3 as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. A higher score indicated more frequent/severe nasal symptoms. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Day 4

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 4
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.2-0.6
Mometasone Furoate (MF)2.2-0.6
Placebo2.3-0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 8 (Participant-Evaluated)

Overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis was evaluated by the participant during the visit and scored on a scale from 0 to 3 as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. A higher score indicated more frequent/severe nasal symptoms. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Day 8

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 8
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.2-0.8
Mometasone Furoate (MF)2.2-0.7
Placebo2.3-0.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to An Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product was also an AE. The number of participants who discontinued due to an AE was reported for each treatment group. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Up to 31 Days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Mometasone Furoate (MF)5
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2
Placebo4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 29 (Physician-Evaluated)

Overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis was evaluated by the physician during the visit and scored on a scale from 0 to 3 as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. A higher score indicated more frequent/severe nasal symptoms. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Day 29

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 29
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.2-0.9
Mometasone Furoate (MF)2.3-0.9
Placebo2.2-0.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced ≥1 Adverse Event

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product was also an AE. The number of participants with at least one AE was reported for each treatment group. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Up to 31 Days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Mometasone Furoate (MF)60
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)64
Placebo78

[back to top]

Response To Therapy At Day 15 (Participant-Evaluated)

Response to therapy was evaluated by the participant and based upon their status scored relative to Baseline. Response was scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = Complete Relief, 2 = Marked Relief, 3 = Moderate Relief, 4= Slight Relief, and 5 = Treatment Failure. A higher score indicated a weaker response. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Day 15

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate (MF)3.0
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.7
Placebo3.3

[back to top]

Response To Therapy At Day 15 (Physician-Evaluated)

Response to therapy was evaluated by the physician and based upon the participant's status scored relative to Baseline. Response was scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = Complete Relief, 2 = Marked Relief, 3 = Moderate Relief, 4= Slight Relief, and 5 = Treatment Failure. A higher score indicated a weaker response. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Day 15

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate (MF)3.0
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.8
Placebo3.3

[back to top]

Response To Therapy At Day 22 (Participant-Evaluated)

Response to therapy was evaluated by the participant and based upon their status scored relative to Baseline. Response was scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = Complete Relief, 2 = Marked Relief, 3 = Moderate Relief, 4= Slight Relief, and 5 = Treatment Failure. A higher score indicated a weaker response. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Day 22

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate (MF)2.9
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.7
Placebo3.1

[back to top]

Response To Therapy At Day 22 (Physician-Evaluated)

Response to therapy was evaluated by the physician and based upon the participant's status scored relative to Baseline. Response was scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = Complete Relief, 2 = Marked Relief, 3 = Moderate Relief, 4= Slight Relief, and 5 = Treatment Failure. A higher score indicated a weaker response. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Day 22

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate (MF)2.8
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.7
Placebo3.1

[back to top]

Response To Therapy At Day 29 (Participant-Evaluated)

Response to therapy was evaluated by the participant and based upon their status scored relative to Baseline. Response was scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = Complete Relief, 2 = Marked Relief, 3 = Moderate Relief, 4= Slight Relief, and 5 = Treatment Failure. A higher score indicated a weaker response. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Day 29

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate (MF)2.9
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.6
Placebo3.3

[back to top]

Response To Therapy At Day 29 (Physician-Evaluated)

Response to therapy was evaluated by the physician and based upon the participant's status scored relative to Baseline. Response was scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = Complete Relief, 2 = Marked Relief, 3 = Moderate Relief, 4= Slight Relief, and 5 = Treatment Failure. A higher score indicated a weaker response. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Day 29

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate (MF)2.9
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.5
Placebo3.2

[back to top]

Response To Therapy At Day 4 (Participant-Evaluated)

Response to therapy was evaluated by the participant and based upon their status scored relative to Baseline. Response was scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = Complete Relief, 2 = Marked Relief, 3 = Moderate Relief, 4= Slight Relief, and 5 = Treatment Failure. A higher score indicated a weaker response. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Day 4

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate (MF)3.3
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)3.2
Placebo3.6

[back to top]

Response To Therapy At Day 4 (Physician-Evaluated)

Response to therapy was evaluated by the physician and based upon the participant's status scored relative to Baseline. Response was scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = Complete Relief, 2 = Marked Relief, 3 = Moderate Relief, 4= Slight Relief, and 5 = Treatment Failure. A higher score indicated a weaker response. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Day 4

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate (MF)3.3
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)3.2
Placebo3.5

[back to top]

Response To Therapy At Day 8 (Participant-Evaluated)

Response to therapy was evaluated by the participant and based upon their status scored relative to Baseline. Response was scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = Complete Relief, 2 = Marked Relief, 3 = Moderate Relief, 4= Slight Relief, and 5 = Treatment Failure. A higher score indicated a weaker response. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Day 8

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate (MF)3.0
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.7
Placebo3.5

[back to top]

Response To Therapy At Day 8 (Physician-Evaluated)

Response to therapy was evaluated by the physician and based upon the participant's status scored relative to Baseline. Response was scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = Complete Relief, 2 = Marked Relief, 3 = Moderate Relief, 4= Slight Relief, and 5 = Treatment Failure. A higher score indicated a weaker response. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Day 8

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate (MF)3.0
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.7
Placebo3.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 15 (Participant-Evaluated)

Overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis was evaluated by the participant during the visit and scored on a scale from 0 to 3 as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. A higher score indicated more frequent/severe nasal symptoms. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Day 15

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 15
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.2-0.8
Mometasone Furoate (MF)2.2-0.7
Placebo2.3-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 15 (Physician-Evaluated)

Overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis was evaluated by the physician during the visit and scored on a scale from 0 to 3 as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. A higher score indicated more frequent/severe nasal symptoms. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Day 15

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 15
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.2-0.8
Mometasone Furoate (MF)2.3-0.7
Placebo2.2-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 22 (Participant-Evaluated)

Overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis was evaluated by the participant during the visit and scored on a scale from 0 to 3 as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. A higher score indicated more frequent/severe nasal symptoms. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Day 22

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 22
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.2-0.9
Mometasone Furoate (MF)2.2-0.9
Placebo2.3-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis At Day 29 (Participant-Evaluated)

Overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis was evaluated by the participant during the visit and scored on a scale from 0 to 3 as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. A higher score indicated more frequent/severe nasal symptoms. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes from baseline indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03855189)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Day 29

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 29
Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP)2.2-0.9
Mometasone Furoate (MF)2.2-0.9
Placebo2.3-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Symptom Score on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)

"The mean change from baseline on study day 8 was calculated for total symptom scores assessed by physician. Total symptom scores are a composite of the following: rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness (congestion), nasal itching, sneezing, itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, redness of the eyes, and itching of the ears or palate scores. Physician scored each symptom during study visit at baseline and study day 8, on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), totaling to a composite score from 0-24 where a higher value indicates greater severity.~A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in symptom severity." (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and study day 8

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 8
Loratadine 10 mg15.9-5.2
MFNS 200 μg16.1-6.9
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg15.9-7.0
Placebo16.2-4.6

[back to top]

Response to Therapy on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)

Mean response to therapy based on the participant's status relative to baseline. Physician scored participant's response on a scale from 1 (complete relief) to 5 (treatment failure) during study visit on study day 8. A higher value indicates weaker response. (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Study day 8

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg3.0
MFNS 200 μg3.1
Loratadine 10 mg3.4
Placebo3.6

[back to top]

Response to Therapy on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)

Mean response to therapy based on the participant's status relative to baseline. Physician scored participant's response on a scale from 1 (complete relief) to 5 (treatment failure) during study visit on study day 15. A higher value indicates weaker response. (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Study day 15

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg2.8
MFNS 200 μg3.0
Loratadine 10 mg3.4
Placebo3.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)

"The mean change from baseline on study day 15 was calculated for overall condition of rhinitis. Physicians scored participant rhinitis condition during study visit at baseline and study day 15, on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). A higher value indicates greater severity.~A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in symptom severity." (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and study day 15

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 15
Loratadine 10 mg2.3-0.6
MFNS 200 μg2.3-0.9
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg2.3-0.9
Placebo2.3-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (Assessed by Participant)

"Mean change from baseline (CFB), averaged over study days 1-15, is calculated for total symptom scores assessed by participants. Participants scored 8 symptoms (rhinorrhea; nasal stuffiness; nasal itching; sneezing; itching/burning eyes; tearing/watering eyes; eye redness; and ear/palate itching) in diaries on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Scores sum to a total symptom score (range: 0-24); higher values indicate greater severity. A decrease in symptom severity is reflected by a negative CFB.~CFB is the 15-day average score minus baseline score. Scores were recorded twice daily, in morning (AM) and night (PM). Average AM/PM scores are first calculated separately, then averaged together to compute the 15-day average score. If diary entries were missing, an average AM or PM score was not calculated. If neither average AM nor PM score was calculated, total 15-day average score was not calculated. Baseline score is an average of the three AM and three PM scores preceding treatment. (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and days 1 through 15 (average of 15 days of treatment)

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Days 1-15
Loratadine 10 mg14.4-3.8
MFNS 200 μg14.2-4.8
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg14.3-5.4
Placebo14.6-2.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)

"The mean change from baseline on study day 15 was calculated for total nasal symptom scores assessed by physician. Total nasal symptom scores are a composite of the following: rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness (congestion), nasal itching, and sneezing scores. Physician scored each symptom during study visit at baseline and study day 8, on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), totaling to a composite score from 0-12 where a higher value indicates greater severity.~A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in symptom severity." (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and study day 8

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 8
Loratadine 10 mg8.6-2.6
MFNS 200 μg8.6-3.6
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg8.7-3.7
Placebo8.8-2.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)

"The mean change from baseline on study day 8 was calculated for overall condition of rhinitis. Physicians scored participant rhinitis condition during study visit at baseline and study day 8, on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). A higher value indicates greater severity.~A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in symptom severity." (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and study day 8

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 8
Loratadine 10 mg2.3-0.5
MFNS 200 μg2.3-0.7
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg2.3-0.8
Placebo2.3-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (Assessed by Participant)

"Mean change from baseline (CFB), averaged over study days 1-15, is calculated for total nasal symptom scores assessed by participants. Participants scored 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea; nasal stuffiness; nasal itching; sneezing) in diaries on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Scores sum to a total nasal symptom score (range: 0-12); higher values indicate greater severity. A decrease in symptom severity is reflected by a negative CFB.~CFB is the 15-day average score minus baseline score. Scores were recorded twice daily, in morning (AM) and night (PM). Average AM/PM scores are first calculated separately, then averaged together to compute the 15-day average score. If diary entries were missing, an average AM or PM score was not calculated. If neither average AM nor PM score was calculated, total 15-day average score was not calculated. Baseline score is an average of the three AM and three PM scores preceding treatment." (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and days 1 through 15 (average of 15 days of treatment)

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Days 1-15
Loratadine 10 mg7.9-1.9
MFNS 200 μg7.8-2.7
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg7.9-3.0
Placebo8.0-1.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)

"The mean change from baseline on study day 15 was calculated for total nasal symptom scores assessed by physician. Total nasal symptom scores are a composite of the following: rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness (congestion), nasal itching, and sneezing scores. Physician scored each symptom during study visit at baseline and study day 15, on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), totaling to a composite score from 0-12 where a higher value indicates greater severity.~A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in symptom severity." (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and study day 15

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 15
Loratadine 10 mg8.6-3.1
MFNS 200 μg8.6-4.2
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg8.7-4.4
Placebo8.8-2.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Symptom Score on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)

"The mean change from baseline on study day 15 was calculated for total symptom scores assessed by physician. Total symptom scores are a composite of the following: rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness (congestion), nasal itching, sneezing, itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, redness of the eyes, and itching of the ears or palate scores. Physician scored each symptom during study visit at baseline and study day 15, on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), totaling to a composite score from 0-24 where a higher value indicates greater severity.~A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in symptom severity." (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and study day 15

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 15
Loratadine 10 mg15.9-6.2
MFNS 200 μg16.1-8.0
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg15.9-8.2
Placebo16.2-5.4

[back to top]

Baseline Overall Disease Condition Score for Calculation of Change From Baseline at Days 4, 8, and 15 as Assessed by Participant

The participant scored the overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis in a diary using the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity. The baseline score was recorded preceding treatment. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1)

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray2.4
Placebo Nasal Spray2.4

[back to top]

Baseline Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) for Calculation of Change From Baseline at Days 4, 8, and 15 Visits as Assessed by Investigator

TNSS was assessed by the investigator who scored 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea; nasal stuffiness; nasal itching; sneezing) in diaries using the scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. The composite score ranged from 0-12 where a higher value indicated greater severity. The baseline score was taken at the baseline visit preceding treatment. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1)

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray8.9
Placebo Nasal Spray8.9

[back to top]

Baseline Overall Disease Condition Score for Calculation of Change From Baseline at Days 4, 8, and 15 Visits as Assessed by Investigator

The investigator scored the overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis for the participant during the study visits using the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity. The baseline score was taken at the baseline visit preceding treatment. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1)

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray2.3
Placebo Nasal Spray2.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (CFB) in Overall Disease Condition Score at Day 15 as Assessed by Participant

CFB on study Day 15 was calculated for the overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis as assessed by the participant. The participant scored their overall condition on study Day 15 on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity. Percent CFB was calculated as the difference between the baseline and Day 15 scores divided by baseline score multiplied by 100. A negative percent CFB indicated a decrease in symptom severity and a positive percent CFB indicated a worsening of symptoms. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-41
Placebo Nasal Spray-21

[back to top]

Baseline Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) for Calculation of Change From Baseline Averaged Over 15 Days of Treatment as Assessed by Participant

TNSS was assessed by participants who scored 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea; nasal stuffiness; nasal itching; sneezing) in diaries using the scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. The composite score ranged from 0-12 where a higher value indicated greater severity. Scores were recorded twice daily, in morning (AM) and night (PM). The baseline score was an average of the three AM and three PM scores preceding treatment. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Baseline (3 days preceding treatment)

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray8.4
Placebo Nasal Spray8.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (CFB) in Overall Disease Condition Score at Day 4 as Assessed by Investigator

CFB on study Day 4 was calculated for the overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis as assessed by the investigator. The investigator scored the overall condition of the participant during the study visit on study Day 4 on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity. Percent CFB was calculated as the difference between the baseline and Day 4 scores divided by baseline score multiplied by 100. A negative percent CFB indicated a decrease in symptom severity and a positive percent CFB indicated a worsening of symptoms. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 4

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-22
Placebo Nasal Spray-16

[back to top]

Therapeutic Response to Treatment at Day 8 as Assessed by Investigator

Mean therapeutic response to treatment was assessed by evaluating the participant's relief of nasal symptoms during study visit on study Day 8. Treatment response was evaluated by the investigator using a 5-point scale: 1=complete relief, 2=marked relief, 3=moderate relief, 4=slight relief, and 5=no relief. The scores were averaged across each treatment group with a lower score indicating a greater response to treatment and an improvement in nasal symptoms. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Day 8

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray2.9
Placebo Nasal Spray3.5

[back to top]

Therapeutic Response to Treatment at Day 8 as Assessed by Participant

Mean therapeutic response to treatment was assessed by the participant using diary cards on Day 8. Treatment response was evaluated by the participant using a 5-point scale: 1=complete relief, 2=marked relief, 3=moderate relief, 4=slight relief, and 5=no relief. The scores were averaged across each treatment group with a lower score indicating a greater response to treatment and an improvement in nasal symptoms. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Day 8

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray2.9
Placebo Nasal Spray3.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (CFB) in Overall Disease Condition Score at Day 4 as Assessed by Participant

CFB on study Day 4 was calculated for the overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis as assessed by the participant. The participant scored their overall condition on study Day 4 on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity. Percent CFB was calculated as the difference between the baseline and Day 4 scores divided by baseline score multiplied by 100. A negative percent CFB indicated a decrease in symptom severity and a positive percent CFB indicated a worsening of symptoms. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 4

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-24
Placebo Nasal Spray-18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (CFB) in Overall Disease Condition Score at Day 8 as Assessed by Investigator

CFB on study Day 8 was calculated for the overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis as assessed by the investigator. The investigator scored the overall condition of the participant during the study visit on study Day 8 on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity. Percent CFB was calculated as the difference between the baseline and Day 8 scores divided by baseline score multiplied by 100. A negative percent CFB indicated a decrease in symptom severity and a positive percent CFB indicated a worsening of symptoms. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 8

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-34
Placebo Nasal Spray-22

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (CFB) in Overall Disease Condition Score at Day 8 as Assessed by Participant

CFB on study Day 8 was calculated for the overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis as assessed by the participant. The participant scored their overall condition on study Day 8 on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity. Percent CFB was calculated as the difference between the baseline and Day 8 scores divided by baseline score multiplied by 100. A negative percent CFB indicated a decrease in symptom severity and a positive percent CFB indicated a worsening of symptoms. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 8

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-36
Placebo Nasal Spray-21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (CFB) in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) at Day 15 as Assessed by Investigator

CFB at Day 15 was calculated for TNSS assessed by the investigator. TNSS was a composite of the following symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness, nasal itching, and sneezing scores. The investigator scored each symptom during study visit on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. The composite score ranged from 0-12 where a higher value indicated greater severity. Percent CFB was calculated as the difference between the baseline and endpoint scores divided by baseline score multiplied by 100. A negative percent CFB indicated a decrease in symptom severity and a positive percent CFB indicated a worsening of symptoms. Signs and symptoms data collected by the investigator for Day 15 were not evaluated because the data was missing from the case report forms. The final endpoint was calculated using the last valid visit for each participant. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Final Endpoint (Up to Day 15). The final endpoint was calculated using the last valid visit for each participant due to missing data at Day 15.

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-43
Placebo Nasal Spray-27

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (CFB) in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) at Day 4 as Assessed by Investigator

CFB on study Day 4 was calculated for TNSS assessed by investigator. TNSS was a composite of the following symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness, nasal itching, and sneezing scores. The investigator scored each symptom during study visit on study Day 4, on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. The composite score ranged from 0-12 where a higher value indicated greater severity. Percent CFB was calculated as the difference between the baseline and Day 4 scores divided by baseline score multiplied by 100. A negative percent CFB indicated a decrease in symptom severity and a positive percent CFB indicated a worsening of symptoms. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 4

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-34
Placebo Nasal Spray-16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (CFB) in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) at Day 8 as Assessed by Investigator

CFB on study Day 8 was calculated for TNSS assessed by investigator. TNSS was a composite of the following symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness, nasal itching, and sneezing scores. The investigator scored each symptom during study visit on study Day 8 on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. The composite score ranged from 0-12 where a higher value indicated greater severity. Percent CFB was calculated as the difference between the baseline and Day 8 scores divided by baseline score multiplied by 100. A negative percent CFB indicated a decrease in symptom severity and a positive percent CFB indicated a worsening of symptoms. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 8

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-44
Placebo Nasal Spray-28

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (CFB) in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Averaged Over 15 Days of Treatment, as Assessed by Participant

"CFB, averaged over study days 1-15, was calculated for TNSS assessed by participants. Participants scored 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea; nasal stuffiness; nasal itching; sneezing) in diaries using the scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. The composite score ranged from 0-12 where a higher value indicated greater severity. A decrease in symptom severity is reflected by a negative CFB.~Percent CFB was calculated as the difference between the baseline and 15-day average scores divided by baseline score multiplied by 100. Scores were recorded twice daily, in morning (AM) and night (PM). Average AM/PM scores were first calculated separately, then averaged together to compute the 15-day average score. If diary entries were missing, an average AM or PM score was not calculated. If neither average AM nor PM score was calculated, total 15-day average score was not calculated. Baseline score was an average of the three AM and three PM scores preceding treatment." (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Baseline (3 days preceding treatment) through Day 15 (averaged over 15 days)

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-39
Placebo Nasal Spray-20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Disease Condition Score at Day 15 as Assessed by Investigator

CFB on study Day 15 was calculated for the overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis as assessed by the investigator. The investigator scored the overall condition of the participant during the study visit on study Day 15 on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity. Percent CFB was calculated as the difference between the baseline and Day 15 scores divided by baseline score multiplied by 100. A negative percent CFB indicated a decrease in symptom severity and a positive percent CFB indicated a worsening of symptoms. Signs and symptoms data collected by the investigator for Day 15 were not evaluated because the data was missing from the case report forms. The final endpoint was calculated using the last valid visit for each participant. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Final Endpoint (Up to Day 15). The final endpoint was calculated using the last valid visit for each participant due to missing data at Day 15.

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-41
Placebo Nasal Spray-18

[back to top]

Median Time to Onset of Nasal Symptom Relief as Assessed by Participant Diary Responses

"Time to onset of relief of nasal stuffiness/congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing, itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, redness of eyes, and itching of ears or palate was assessed by the participant using diary response data in the morning and night for the first 3 days of treatment. The participants were asked to rate their relief on the following scale: 1=complete, 2=marked, 3=moderate, 4=slight, and 5=none. If a participant recorded a degree of relief that was at least moderate (3 or below), they answered the question, When did you first experience noticeable relief? and noted the date and time. The data were analyzed using a log ranked test and with a Kaplan-Meier estimate. Any participant who did not experience at least moderate relief by the end of 72 hours was considered censored at that time in the analysis. Time to onset of relief is presented in hours." (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment until onset of symptom relief (up to Day 4)

InterventionHours (Median)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray35.9
Placebo Nasal Spray72.0

[back to top]

Therapeutic Response to Treatment at Day 15 as Assessed by Investigator

Mean therapeutic response to treatment was assessed by evaluating the participant's relief of nasal symptoms during study visit on study Day 15. Treatment response was evaluated by the investigator using a 5-point scale: 1=complete relief, 2=marked relief, 3=moderate relief, 4=slight relief, and 5=no relief. The scores were averaged across each treatment group with a lower score indicating a greater response to treatment and an improvement in nasal symptoms. Signs and symptoms data collected by the investigator for Day 15 were not evaluated because the data was missing from the case report forms. The final endpoint was calculated using the last valid visit for each participant. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Final Endpoint (Up to Day 15). The final endpoint was calculated using the last valid visit for each participant due to missing data at Day 15.

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray2.7
Placebo Nasal Spray3.7

[back to top]

Therapeutic Response to Treatment at Day 15 as Assessed by Participant

Mean therapeutic response to treatment was assessed by the participant using diary cards on Day 15. Treatment response was evaluated by the participant using a 5-point scale: 1=complete relief, 2=marked relief, 3=moderate relief, 4=slight relief, and 5=no relief. The scores were averaged across each treatment group with a lower score indicating a greater response to treatment and an improvement in nasal symptoms. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Day 15

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray2.8
Placebo Nasal Spray3.6

[back to top]

Therapeutic Response to Treatment at Day 4 as Assessed by Investigator

Mean therapeutic response to treatment was assessed by evaluating the participant's relief of nasal symptoms during study visit on study Day 4. Treatment response was evaluated by the investigator using a 5-point scale: 1=complete relief, 2=marked relief, 3=moderate relief, 4=slight relief, and 5=no relief. The scores were averaged across each treatment group with a lower score indicating a greater response to treatment and an improvement in nasal symptoms. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Day 4

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray3.2
Placebo Nasal Spray3.8

[back to top]

Therapeutic Response to Treatment at Day 4 as Assessed by Participant

Mean therapeutic response to treatment was assessed by the participant using diary cards on Day 4. Treatment response was evaluated by the participant using a 5-point scale: 1=complete relief, 2=marked relief, 3=moderate relief, 4=slight relief, and 5=no relief. The scores were averaged across each treatment group with a lower score indicating a greater response to treatment and an improvement in nasal symptoms. (NCT03861559)
Timeframe: Day 4

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray3.2
Placebo Nasal Spray3.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) on Day 4 as Assessed by Investigator

The mean change from baseline at study day 4 was calculated for TNSS as assessed by the investigator. TNSS was a composite of the individual nasal symptom scores of discharge (rhinorrhea), stuffiness, sneezing, and itching. The 4 individual nasal symptom scores were rated by the investigator at the visit as follows: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. TNSS was the sum of the 4 individual nasal symptom scores (range= 0-12; higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms). For each participant, individual scores were totaled and used to calculate the change from Baseline in TNSS at the visit. Participant changes were then used to calculate the mean change for each treatment group at that visit. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03879772)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 4

,,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 4
BDP 84 mcg BID8.0-2.4
MFNS 100 mcg QD8.1-2.0
MFNS 200 mcg QD7.9-2.0
MFNS 25 mcg QD7.8-2.2
Placebo8.0-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) on Day 29 as Assessed by Investigator

The mean change from baseline at study day 29 was calculated for TNSS as assessed by the investigator. TNSS was a composite of the individual nasal symptom scores of discharge (rhinorrhea), stuffiness, sneezing, and itching. The 4 individual nasal symptom scores were rated by the investigator at the visit as follows: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. TNSS was the sum of the 4 individual nasal symptom scores (range= 0-12; higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms). For each participant, individual scores were totaled and used to calculate the change from Baseline in TNSS at the visit. Participant changes were then used to calculate the mean change for each treatment group at that visit. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03879772)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 29

,,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 29
BDP 84 mcg BID8.0-3.7
MFNS 100 mcg QD8.1-3.7
MFNS 200 mcg QD7.9-3.8
MFNS 25 mcg QD7.8-3.1
Placebo8.0-2.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) [Average of Morning (AM)/Evening (PM) Score] Averaged Over Days 16 to 29 as Assessed by Participant

Mean change from baseline (CFB) averaged over study days 1-15 was calculated for TNSS assessed by participants (with assistance from caregiver). Participants scored 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, stuffiness, itching, sneezing) in diaries using the scale 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. TNSS was the sum of the 4 individual scores (range=0-12; higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms.) CFD=the 15-day average score-baseline score. Scores were recorded twice daily, in the morning (AM) and evening (PM). Average AM/PM scores were first calculated separately, then averaged together to obtain the 15-day average score. If diary entries were missing, an average AM or PM score was not calculated. If neither average AM nor PM score were calculated, the total 15-day average score was not calculated. Baseline score=Mean of the Baseline AM (day of visit plus 3 preceding days) and the Baseline PM (3 preceding days) scores. Negative change indicated a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03879772)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 16 through 29 (average over 15 days)

,,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Days 16 to 29
BDP 84 mcg BID6.6-2.6
MFNS 100 mcg QD6.9-2.8
MFNS 200 mcg QD6.9-2.7
MFNS 25 mcg QD6.3-2.1
Placebo6.8-1.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) [Average of Morning (AM), Evening (PM) Score] Averaged Over Days 1 to 15 as Assessed by Participant

Mean change from baseline (CFB) averaged over study days 1-15 was calculated for TNSS assessed by participants (with assistance from caregiver). Participants scored 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, stuffiness, itching, sneezing) in diaries using the scale 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. TNSS was the sum of the 4 individual scores (range=0-12; higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms.) CFD=the 15-day average score-baseline score. Scores were recorded twice daily, in the morning (AM) and evening (PM). Average AM/PM scores were first calculated separately, then averaged together to obtain the 15-day average score. If diary entries were missing, an average AM or PM score was not calculated. If neither average AM nor PM score were calculated, the total 15-day average score was not calculated. Baseline score=Mean of the Baseline AM (day of visit plus 3 preceding days) and the Baseline PM (3 preceding days) scores. Negative change indicated a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03879772)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 1 through 15 (average over 15 days)

,,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Days 1 to 15
BDP 84 mcg BID6.6-1.9
MFNS 100 mcg QD6.9-1.9
MFNS 200 mcg QD6.9-1.8
MFNS 25 mcg QD6.3-1.5
Placebo6.8-1.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) on Day 15 as Assessed by Investigator

The mean change from baseline at study day 15 was calculated for TNSS as assessed by the investigator. TNSS was a composite of the individual nasal symptom scores of discharge (rhinorrhea), stuffiness, sneezing, and itching. The 4 individual nasal symptom scores were rated by the investigator at the visit as follows: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. TNSS was the sum of the 4 individual nasal symptom scores (range= 0-12; higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms). For each participant, individual scores were totaled and used to calculate the change from Baseline in TNSS at the visit. Participant changes were then used to calculate the mean change for each treatment group at that visit. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03879772)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15

,,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 15
BDP 84 mcg BID8.0-3.5
MFNS 100 mcg QD8.1-3.0
MFNS 200 mcg QD7.9-3.1
MFNS 25 mcg QD7.8-2.9
Placebo8.0-2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) at Day 8 as Assessed by Investigator

The mean change from baseline at study day 8 was calculated for TNSS as assessed by the investigator. TNSS was a composite of the individual nasal symptom scores of discharge (rhinorrhea), stuffiness, sneezing, and itching. The 4 individual nasal symptom scores were rated by the investigator at the visit as follows: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. TNSS was the sum of the 4 individual nasal symptom scores (range= 0-12; higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms). For each participant, individual scores were totaled and used to calculate the change from Baseline in TNSS at the visit. Participant changes were then used to calculate the mean change for each treatment group at that visit. Change from Baseline = visit score - Baseline score (Day 1 visit). Negative changes indicate a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03879772)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 8

,,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 8
BDP 84 mcg BID8.0-2.8
MFNS 100 mcg QD8.1-2.8
MFNS 200 mcg QD7.9-2.8
MFNS 25 mcg QD7.8-2.8
Placebo8.0-1.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score Averaged Over Day 1 Through Day 15 (Based on Participant Diaries)

Change from baseline averaged over study Day 1 through study Day 15 was calculated for Total Nasal Symptom Score, based on participant diaries. Participants scored 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, stuffiness, itching, sneezing) in their diaries using the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. The Total Nasal Symptom Score was the sum of the 4 individual scores (range=0-12; higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms.) Change from baseline was the 15-day average score minus the baseline score. Scores were recorded twice daily, in the morning (AM) and night (PM). Average AM/PM scores were first calculated separately, then averaged together to obtain the 15-day average score. Baseline score was an average of the 3 AM scores and 3 PM scores preceding treatment. Negative changes indicated a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03882047)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 through Day 15 (averaged over 15 days)

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-2.8
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray-3.4
Placebo Nasal Spray-0.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score at Day 4 (Physician Evaluation)

Change from baseline at Day 4 was calculated for the Total Nasal Symptom Score, as assessed by the physician. The Total Nasal Symptom Score was a composite of the following symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness, nasal itching, and sneezing scores. The physician scored each symptom during the study visit on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. The composite score ranged from 0-12. Change from baseline = visit score - baseline score (Day 1 visit). A negative change from baseline score indicated a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03882047)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 4

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-3.2
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray-3.5
Placebo Nasal Spray-1.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score at Day 15 (Physician Evaluation)

Change from baseline at Day 15 was calculated for the Total Nasal Symptom Score, as assessed by the physician. The Total Nasal Symptom Score was a composite of the following symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness, nasal itching, and sneezing scores. The physician scored each symptom during the study visit on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. The composite score ranged from 0-12. Change from baseline = visit score - baseline score (Day 1 visit). A negative change from baseline score indicated a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03882047)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-4.4
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray-5.5
Placebo Nasal Spray-2.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis at Day 4 (Physician Evaluation)

Change from baseline at Day 4 was calculated for the Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis, as assessed by the physician. The physician scored their overall condition on study Day 4 on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity of symptoms. Change from baseline = visit score - baseline score (Day 1 visit). A negative change from baseline score indicated a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03882047)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 4

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-0.5
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray-0.7
Placebo Nasal Spray-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis at Day 4 (Participant Evaluation)

The overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis was evaluated by the participant on Day 4, based on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity of symptoms. Change from baseline = visit score - baseline score (Day 1 visit). A negative change from baseline score indicated a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03882047)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 4

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-0.6
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray-0.8
Placebo Nasal Spray-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis at Day 15 (Physician Evaluation)

Change from baseline at Day 15 was calculated for the overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis, as assessed by the physician. The physician scored their overall condition on study Day 15 on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity of symptoms. Change from baseline = visit score - baseline score (Day 1 visit). A negative change from baseline score indicated a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03882047)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-0.9
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray-1.2
Placebo Nasal Spray-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis at Day 15 (Participant Evaluation)

The overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis was evaluated by the participant on Day 15, based on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity of symptoms. Change from baseline = visit score - baseline score (Day 1 visit). A negative change from baseline score indicated a decrease in symptom severity. (NCT03882047)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray-1.1
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray-1.3
Placebo Nasal Spray-0.5

[back to top]

Response to Therapy at Day 4 (Physician Evaluation)

Response to therapy was assessed by evaluating the participant's relief of nasal symptoms at Day 4. The physician evaluated the participant's response using the following 5-point scale: 1=complete relief, 2=marked relief, 3=moderate relief, 4=slight relief, and 5=no relief. The scores were averaged across each treatment group, with a lower score indicating a greater response to therapy and an improvement in nasal symptoms. (NCT03882047)
Timeframe: Day 4

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray3.2
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray3.1
Placebo Nasal Spray3.8

[back to top]

Response to Therapy at Day 4 (Participant Evaluation)

Response to therapy was evaluated by participants and based upon their status scored at Day 4. Participants evaluated their response to therapy using the following 5-point scale: 1 = Complete Relief, 2 = Marked Relief, 3 = Moderate Relief, 4= Slight Relief, and 5 = Treatment Failure. The scores were averaged across each treatment group, with a lower score indicating a greater response to therapy and an improvement in nasal symptoms. (NCT03882047)
Timeframe: Day 4

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray3.2
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray3.1
Placebo Nasal Spray3.7

[back to top]

Response to Therapy at Day 15 (Physician Evaluation)

Response to therapy was assessed by evaluating the participant's relief of nasal symptoms at Day 15. The physician evaluated the participant's response using the following 5-point scale: 1=complete relief, 2=marked relief, 3=moderate relief, 4=slight relief, and 5=no relief. The scores were averaged across each treatment group, with a lower score indicating a greater response to therapy and an improvement in nasal symptoms. (NCT03882047)
Timeframe: Day 15

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray2.7
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray2.4
Placebo Nasal Spray3.2

[back to top]

Response to Therapy at Day 15 (Participant Evaluation)

Response to therapy was evaluated by participants and based upon their status scored at Day 15. Participants evaluated their response to therapy using the following 5-point scale: 1 = Complete Relief, 2 = Marked Relief, 3 = Moderate Relief, 4= Slight Relief, and 5 = Treatment Failure. The scores were averaged across each treatment group, with a lower score indicating a greater response to therapy and an improvement in nasal symptoms. (NCT03882047)
Timeframe: Day 15

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray2.6
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray2.4
Placebo Nasal Spray3.4

[back to top]

Pulmonary Function Measured by Spirometry: Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) / Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

"FEV1 is air volume exhaled in 1 second during spirometry. Forced vital capacity is the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. The change in FEV1/FVC was calculated between V1 (Baseline), V2 (Guideline Care - before intervention), and V3 (12 Months). This will be used as a measurement in asthma severity.~[A lower FEV1/FVC ratio indicates more severe asthma]" (NCT04179461)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

InterventionRatio (Median)
V1V2V3
Personalized Treatment0.810.80.8

[back to top]

Asthma Control Test (ACT)

"ACT was measured by questionnaire, assessing frequency of reported asthma symptoms, rescue medication use, the effect of asthma on daily functioning, and overall asthma control. The change in ACT score was calculated between V1 (Baseline), V2 (Guideline Care - before intervention), and V3 (12 Months).~[The ACT score has a minimum value = 5, maximum value = 25, a score 19 indicates well-controlled asthma]" (NCT04179461)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
V1V2V3
Personalized Treatment23.021.722.5

[back to top]

Adherence of Asthma Controller Medication

Adherence was measured using the Propeller Health Inhaler monitor and web-based software management platform that tracks adherence of asthma medications. The change in adherence was calculated between V1 (baseline) to V3 (12 Months). (NCT04179461)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of medication taken (Median)
V1V3
Personalized Treatment4236

[back to top]

Change in Composite Asthma Severity Index (CASI)

"CASI was measured by questionnaire and is a severity score of symptom burden, exacerbations, healthcare utilization, lung function and dose of inhaled corticosteroids. The change in CASI score was calculated between V1 (Baseline), V2 (Guideline Care - before intervention), and V3 (12 Months).~[The CASI score has a minimum value = 0, maximum value = 20, a higher score indicates greater asthma severity]" (NCT04179461)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
V1V2V3
Personalized Treatment555

[back to top]

The Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve Disease Control Without Rescue Therapy

Disease control is defined as ≤ 3 new blisters/eczematous lesions/urticarial plaques/day and healing of existing blisters/eczematous lesions/urticarial plaques without requiring rescue therapy. (NCT04499235)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 3 weeks (until disease control)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Mometasone Furoate + AKST42902
Mometasone Furoate + Placebo1

[back to top]

Total Cumulative Steroid Exposure

Total cumulative steroid exposure (cortisol equivalent/kg) by treatment group (NCT04499235)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 3 weeks (EOT). EOT occurs at disease control (assessed every day from Week 1/Day 7 up to Week 3/Day 21 +/- 2 days) or at Week 3/Day 21 +/- 2 days when the subject is discontinued from treatment due to not reaching disease control.

Interventionmg cortisol equivalent/kg (Mean)
Mometasone Furoate + AKST4290260

[back to top]

Maximum Daily Steroid Dose

Evaluation of maximum daily steroid dose at baseline, by treatment week, and at disease control. Study Day 1 is defined as the initiation of study treatment. 1 mg/kg prednisolon(e) = 5 mg/kg cortisone. (NCT04499235)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 3 weeks (EOT). EOT occurs at disease control (assessed every day from Week 1/Day 7 up to Week 3/Day 21 +/- 2 days) or at Week 3/Day 21 +/- 2 days when the subject is discontinued from treatment due to not reaching disease control.

Interventionmg cortisol equivalent/kg (Number)
Maximum Daily Steroid Dose Occurred: Day 4Maximum Daily Steroid Dose Occurred: Day 8Maximum Daily Steroid Dose Occurred: Day 11
Mometasone Furoate + AKST4290175150150

[back to top]

Number of Participants With TEAEs, Assessed by Seriousness and Severity

Treatment-emergent AEs summarized by MedDRA coding terms; separate tabulations produced for incidence, seriousness and severity of AEs (NCT04499235)
Timeframe: Baseline to 5 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Subjects Reporting at Least One TEAESubjects Reporting at Least One Serious TEAETEAE by Severity: MildTEAE by Severity: ModerateTEAE by Severity: Severe
Mometasone Furoate + AKST429020200
Mometasone Furoate + Placebo11001

[back to top]

The Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) Score

Change from baseline in BPDAI score at End of Treatment (EOT). Subscales for the BPDAI include the skin blister score (range 0-120), skin urticarial score (range 0-120), mucosal activity score (range 0-120), and damage score (range 0-12). Higher scores indicate greater disease activity or damage. (NCT04499235)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 3 weeks (EOT). EOT occurs at disease control (assessed every day from Week 1/Day 7 up to Week 3/Day 21 +/- 2 days) or at Week 3/Day 21 +/- 2 days when the subject is discontinued from treatment due to not reaching disease control.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Total BPDAI Skin Blister Score: BaselineTotal BPDAI Skin Blister Score: EOTTotal BPDAI Skin Urticarial Score: BaselineTotal BPDAI Skin Urticarial Score: EOTTotal BPDAI Mucosal Activity Score: BaselineTotal BPDAI Mucosal Activity Score: EOTTotal BPDAI Damage Score: BaselineTotal BPDAI Damage Score: EOT
Mometasone Furoate + AKST4290157.416.49.23.41.65.05.0
Mometasone Furoate + Placebo13.08.014.012.0009.08.0

[back to top]

The Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index Visual Analog Scale (BPDAI-VAS)

Change from baseline in pruritus as evaluated by the BPDAI-VAS at End of Treatment (EOT). EOT occurs at disease control (up to 3 weeks) or at Week 3 when the subject is discontinued from treatment due to not reaching disease control. Scores for the BPDAI-VAS can range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating a worse condition. (NCT04499235)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 3 weeks (EOT). EOT occurs at disease control (assessed every day from Week 1/Day 7 up to Week 3/Day 21 +/- 2 days) or at Week 3/Day 21 +/- 2 days when the subject is discontinued from treatment due to not reaching disease control.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BPDAI-VAS BaselineBPDAI-VAS EOT
Mometasone Furoate + AKST429019.49.2
Mometasone Furoate + Placebo15.04.0

[back to top]

Time to Rescue Therapy

Time to rescue therapy by treatment day/week. The time to rescue therapy is calculated as the start date of the first rescue therapy minus Date of Visit 2 (Baseline (Day 1)) plus 1. (NCT04499235)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 3 weeks (EOT). EOT occurs at disease control (assessed every day from Week 1/Day 7 up to Week 3/Day 21 +/- 2 days) or at Week 3/Day 21 +/- 2 days when the subject is discontinued from treatment due to not reaching disease control.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Time (Days) to Rescue Therapy: 4Time (Days) to Rescue Therapy 8Time (Days) to Rescue Therapy 9
Mometasone Furoate + AKST4290111
Mometasone Furoate + Placebo000

[back to top]

Time to Disease Control

Time to disease control by treatment day/week. The time to disease control is calculated as the date of disease control minus Date of Visit 2 (Baseline (Day 1)) plus 1. (NCT04499235)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 3 weeks (until disease control)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Time (Days) to Disease Control: 8Time (Days) to Disease Control: 11Time (Days) to Disease Control: 15Time (Days) to Disease Control: 16Time (Days) to Disease Control: 22
Mometasone Furoate + AKST429012011
Mometasone Furoate + Placebo00100

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time Point 6h (AUC0-6h) of Mometasone Furoate

"AUC0-6h of mometasone furoate was determined using non-compartment methods with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8.0 or higher). The linear trapezoidal rule was used for AUC0-6h calculation.~A correction factor was applied to MF pharmacokinetic parameters to consider the first-dose effect that is based on the fact that the participants in this study received a single dose from single unused (unprimed) C1 and TH devices. Unprimed devices are not coated with the formulation, and therefore may lead to lower fine particle mass (FPM) and delivered dose compared to later doses actuated from the device throughout its use time. The first-dose correction factor (FPMprimed (MF) / FPMunprimed (MF)) for MF delivered via TH was 1.26 and for MF delivered via C1 it was 1.62." (NCT04589663)
Timeframe: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 and Day 6-9

Interventionh*pg/mL (Mean)
MF 100 ug Via Twisthaler208
QMF149 75/40 ug Via Concept 1176

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Mometasone Furoate Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

"Mometasone furoate plasma concentrations were determined by a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Cmax of mometasone furoate was determined with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8.0 or higher).~A correction factor was applied to MF pharmacokinetic parameters to consider the first-dose effect that is based on the fact that the participants in this study received a single dose from single unused (unprimed) C1 and TH devices. Unprimed devices are not coated with the formulation, and therefore may lead to lower fine particle mass (FPM) and delivered dose compared to later doses actuated from the device throughout its use time. The first-dose correction factor (FPMprimed (MF) / FPMunprimed (MF)) for MF delivered via TH was 1.26 and for MF delivered via C1 it was 1.62." (NCT04589663)
Timeframe: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 and Day 6-9

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
MF 100 ug Via Twisthaler51.9
QMF149 75/40 ug Via Concept 153.5

[back to top]

Systemic Exposure to Indacaterol in Plasma

"Systemic exposure to indacaterol in plasma following sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling on Day 6-9 after inhalation of QMF149.~A correction factor was applied to indacaterol plasma concentrations to consider the first-dose effect that is based on the fact that the participants in this study received a single dose from single unused (unprimed) C1 and TH devices. Unprimed devices are not coated with the formulation, and therefore may lead to lower fine particle mass (FPM) and delivered dose compared to later doses actuated from the device throughout its use time. The first-dose correction factor (FPMprimed (indacaterol) / FPMunprimed (indacaterol)) for indacaterol delivered via C1 was 2.0." (NCT04589663)
Timeframe: pre-dose, 0.25 and 1 hour post-dose on Day 6-9

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose0.25 hours post-dose1 hours post-dose
MF Followed by QMF1490102.062.3

[back to top]