Page last updated: 2024-12-04

dacarbazine

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Dacarbazine, also known as DTIC, is an alkylating agent used in the treatment of certain types of cancer, including Hodgkin's lymphoma, melanoma, and soft tissue sarcoma. Its synthesis involves the reaction of 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide with 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea. Dacarbazine exerts its anti-cancer effects by inhibiting DNA synthesis and repair, leading to cell death. The compound is studied extensively due to its effectiveness in treating various cancers and its unique mechanism of action, which differs from other chemotherapy drugs. Its importance lies in its role as a valuable treatment option for patients with certain types of cancer, offering a chance for remission or extended survival.'

(E)-dacarbazine : A dacarbazine in which the N=N double bond adopts a trans-configuration. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID135398738
CHEMBL ID476
CHEBI ID177836
CHEBI ID94587
SCHEMBL ID1014331
SCHEMBL ID5561
SCHEMBL ID5560
MeSH IDM0005636
PubMed CID2942
CHEMBL ID1574179
CHEBI ID4305

Synonyms (238)

Synonym
4-[(e)-dimethylaminodiazenyl]-1h-imidazole-5-carboxamide
CHEBI:177836
(e)-dacarbazine
BRD-K35520305-001-07-8
imidazole-4-carboxamide, 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)-
nsc-45388
NSC45388 ,
4(5)-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5(4)-carboxamide
dtie
5-(3,3-dimethyltriazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide
5-(dimethyltriazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide
5-(dimethyltriazeno)imidazole-4-carboximide
dimethyltriazenoimidazolecarboxamide
4-(or 5)-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5(or 4)-carboxamide
carboxamide,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-
icdmt
deticene
dtic-dome
nci-c04717
dtic
imidazole-4-carboxamide,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)-
(dimethyltriazeno)imidazolecarboxamide
4-(dimethyltriazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide
imidazole-4(or 5)-carboxamide,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)-
di-me-triazenoimidazolecarboxamide
4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide
4-(5)-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5(4)-carboxamide
1h-imidazole-4-carboxamide,3-dimethyl-1-triazenyl)-
5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide
icdt
nsc 45388
wln: t5m cnj dvz enunn1&1
dacarbazinum
dacarbazina
hsdb 3219
5-(3,3-dimethyltriaz-1-en-1-yl)-1h-imidazole-4-carboxamide
biocarbazine r
ai3-52825
dacarbazinum [inn-latin]
ccris 190
4(5)-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide
dimethyl triazeno imidazole carboxamide
1h-imidazole-4-carboxamide, 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazenyl)-
dacatic
einecs 224-396-1
carboxamide, 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-
5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazenyl)-1h-imidazole-4-carboxamide
dacarbazino [inn-spanish]
5(or 4)-(dimethyltriazeno)imidazole-4(or 5)-carboxamide
decarbazine
imidazole-4(or 5)-carboxamide, 5(or 4)-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)-
imidazole-4-carboxamide, 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazenyl)-
carboxamide, dimethyl imidazole
imidazole carboxamide, dimethyl
4-[(e)-dimethylaminoazo]-1h-imidazole-5-carboxamide
imidazole carboxamide
4-[(1e)-3,3-dimethyltriaz-1-en-1-yl]-1h-imidazole-5-carboxamide
NCGC00091861-01
DACARBAZINE ,
C06936
4342-03-4
DB00851
biocarbazine
D00288
dacarbazine (jan/usp/inn)
dtic-dome (tn)
NCGC00091861-02
SPECTRUM1500218
NCGC00091861-04
NCGC00091861-03
HMS2090A20
HMS2091I20
dacarbasine
nci c04717
CHEMBL476
dicarbazine
HMS501A08
(5e)-5-(dimethylaminohydrazinylidene)imidazole-4-carboxamide
NCGC00091861-05
NCGC00188955-01
NCGC00258563-01
tox21_201010
A826278
(5e)-5-(dimethylaminohydrazinylidene)-4-imidazolecarboxamide
AKOS005220502
pharmakon1600-01500218
nsc-759610
nsc759610
dtxcid20369
tox21_111171
dtxsid0020369 ,
cas-4342-03-4
750512-03-9
CCG-40272
CCG-36068
CCG-35381
dacarbazine [usan:usp:inn:ban:jan]
dacarbazino
4-(or 5)-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5(or 4)-carboxamide
unii-7gr28w0fji
7gr28w0fji ,
dacarbazine [usan]
dacarbazine [jan]
dacarbazine [who-dd]
dacarbazine [usp monograph]
dacarbazine [orange book]
dacarbazine [ep monograph]
dacarbazinum [who-ip latin]
dacarbazine [iarc]
dacarbazine [hsdb]
dacarbazine [who-ip]
dacarbazine [mi]
dacarbazine [usp-rs]
dacarbazine [inn]
dacarbazine [mart.]
dacarbazine [vandf]
S1221
AKOS015850745
SCHEMBL1014331
CS-1772
HY-B0078
SCHEMBL5561
SCHEMBL5560
tox21_111171_1
NCGC00091861-07
KS-5186
W-106228
5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazenyl)imidazole-4-carboxamide
FDKXTQMXEQVLRF-ZHACJKMWSA-N
(5z)-5-(dimethylaminohydrazono)imidazole-4-carboxamide
(5e)-5-(dimethylaminohydrazono)imidazole-4-carboxamide
mfcd00057167
5- (3,3-dimethyl-1-triazenyl) imidazole-4-carboxamide
AKOS026750028
sr-05000001598
SR-05000001598-3
5-(dimethyltriaz-1-en-1-yl)-1h-imidazole-4-carboxamide
CHEBI:94587
dacarbazine, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
bdbm233149
SR-05000001598-1
dacarbazine, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
SBI-0051328.P003
dacarbazine, pharmaceutical secondary standard; certified reference material
dacarbazine, british pharmacopoeia (bp) reference standard
dacarbazine (dtic-dome)
BRD-K35520305-001-04-5
nsc-799994
nsc799994
5-[(1e)-dimethyltriaz-1-en-1-yl]-1h-imidazole-4-carboxamide
EN300-7357020
5-(3,3-dimethyltriaz-1-enyl)-1h-imidazole-4-carboxamide
l01ax04
1 h-imidazole-4-carboxamide, 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazenyl)-
imidazole carboxamide dimethyltriazeno
asercit
dakarbazin
fauldetic
dacarbazina almirall
dimethyl-triazeno-imidazole-carboximide
dacarbazine (mart.)
dacarbazine-dtic
dimethyl (triazeno) imidazolecarboxamide
dacarbazine (usp monograph)
dacarbazine (usp-rs)
detimedac
imidazole-4-carboxamide, 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno1-
dacarbazin
dacarbazine (iarc)
dacarbazine (ep monograph)
dtic-aome
wr-139007
dimethyl triazeno imidazol carboxamide
dimethyl-triazeno-imidazole carboxamide
5-(3-3-dimethyl-1-triazenyl)-1h-imidazole-4-carboxamide
Z2289761610
KBIO1_000326
DIVK1C_000326
NCIMECH_000261
NCI60_004053
CHEBI:4305 ,
SPECTRUM_000884
BPBIO1_000428
SMP2_000251
PRESTWICK_904
BSPBIO_000388
PRESTWICK3_000574
PRESTWICK2_000574
IDI1_000326
KBIO2_006500
KBIO2_003932
KBIO3_001311
KBIO2_001364
KBIOGR_000896
KBIOSS_001364
PRESTWICK1_000574
SPBIO_001075
SPECTRUM3_000366
SPECTRUM4_000308
NINDS_000326
SPBIO_002607
SPECTRUM2_001148
PRESTWICK0_000574
SPECTRUM5_000823
BSPBIO_002091
MLS001332544
smr000857131
MLS001332543
D3634
FT-0665443
HMS1569D10
HMS2096D10
CHEMBL1574179
(e)-5-(3,3-dimethyltriaz-1-en-1-yl)-1h-imidazole-4-carboxamide
HMS2231L23
FT-0603657
FT-0624397
NCGC00091861-06
1185241-28-4
HMS3369K21
CCG-220574
gtpl9075
AKOS025402325
AC-8116
HMS3654J03
FDKXTQMXEQVLRF-UHFFFAOYSA-N
HMS3713D10
SW219867-1
(e)-5-(3,3-dimethyltriaz-1-enyl)-1h-imidazole-4-carboxamide
Q416975
Q63088173
Q27166417
5-(dimethylaminohydrazinylidene)-4-imidazolecarboxamide
2,2,3,3,4,6,6-heptachlorobiphenyl
BCP08972
wr139007
T70919
AKOS037515488

Research Excerpts

Toxicity

This systematic review aims to synthesize safety data from clinical trials on ipilimumab, vemurafenib, interferon (IFN) alfa-2b, dacarbazine and interleukin (IL)-2 to elucidate the severe adverse events associated with each melanoma therapy. Similar side effect intensity of BZA2 and dacarbazine was observed, whereas BZA1 was more toxic.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The close correspondence of the two QSAR leaves essentially no means for the synthesis of more potent, less toxic triazenes."( Antitumor 1-(X-aryl)-3,3-dialkyltriazenes. 2. On the role of correlation analysis in decision making in drug modification. Toxicity quantitative structure-activity relationships of 1-(X-phenyl)-3,3-dialkyltriazenes in mice.
Greenberg, N; Hansch, C; Hatheway, GJ; Quinn, FR, 1978
)
0.26
"Decomposition of the antitumor agent 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide (DTIC, Dacarbazine) produces several potentially toxic compounds, the concentration of which depend on incubation parameters such as pH, temperature and illumination."( Mechanisms of 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide (Dacarbazine) cytotoxicity toward Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro are dictated by incubation conditions.
Chao, LY; DeChang, W; Saunders, PP, 1986
)
0.27
" Since it was unclear whether light exposure enhanced DTIC antitumor activity or local toxic effects in vivo, a series of experiments was performed in mice given DTIC solutions exposed to light for 2 hours at room temperature."( Experimental dacarbazine antitumor activity and skin toxicity in relation to light exposure and pharmacologic antidotes.
Alberts, DS; Dorr, RT; Einspahr, J; Mason-Liddil, N; Soble, M, 1987
)
0.27
" It appears that DTIC hyperthermic isolation perfusion is a safe procedure, however, the total dosage should be below 40 mg/kg to avoid hematologic toxicity."( Toxicity and complications of vascular isolation and hyperthermic perfusion with imidazole carboxamide (DTIC) in melanoma.
Didolkar, MS; Fitzpatrick, JL; Jackson, AJ; Johnston, GS, 1986
)
0.27
" DM-COOK's greater chemical stability might be an advantage, as the decomposition of DTIC is thought to lead to products responsible for some toxic effects in humans."( Comparison of the antitumor activity of DTIC and 1-p-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno) benzoic acid potassium salt on murine transplantable tumors and their hematological toxicity.
Colombo, T; D'Incalci, M, 1984
)
0.27
" M&B 39565 and MCTIC were 5- to 6-fold more toxic to VA-13 cells than to IMR-90 cells for drug concentrations which produced a 2-log cell kill, as measured by colony-forming assays."( DNA cross-linking and cytotoxicity in normal and transformed human cells treated in vitro with 8-carbamoyl-3-(2-chloroethyl)imidazo[5,1-d] -1,2,3,5-tetrazin-4(3H)-one.
Erickson, LC; Gibson, NW; Hickman, JA, 1984
)
0.27
"5 mg/g), the drug was toxic to both aerobic and hypoxic tumor cells with some evidence of increased toxicity towards hypoxic cells."( Selective toxicity of 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide toward hypoxic mammalian cells.
Mohindra, JK; Rauth, AM, 1981
)
0.26
" Although the neurotoxic effects produced by different cytostatics present a different appearance and are partly of only sporadic or slight clinical importance, there is hardly a cytostatic which does not exercise a side effect on the nervous system."( [Neurotoxic side effects of cytostatic therapy (author's transl)].
Maurach, R; Strian, F, 1981
)
0.26
" Dacarbazine (5-(3,3-dimethyl-triazeno) imidazole-4-carboxamide), 3 and 6 mM, was toxic to SECs but not to hepatocytes."( Dacarbazine toxicity in murine liver cells: a model of hepatic endothelial injury and glutathione defense.
Deleve, LD, 1994
)
0.29
"The effects of treatment of mice with O6-benzylguanine (O6-BeG) on the levels of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (ATase) in the hematopoietic compartment and on the in vivo sensitivity of hematopoietic progenitor cells to the toxic and clastogenic effects of the antitumor agents 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-nitrosourea (BCNU) and temozolomide were studied."( O6-benzylguanine potentiates the in vivo toxicity and clastogenicity of temozolomide and BCNU in mouse bone marrow.
Ashby, J; Chinnasamy, N; Dexter, TM; Fairbairn, LJ; Hickson, I; Margison, GP; Rafferty, JA; Tinwell, H, 1997
)
0.3
" Similar degrees of protection were seen for the methylating agent streptozotocin, but no protection was detected for the chloroethylating agents carmustine or mitozolomide in the samples for which there was protection against the toxic effects of Tz."( Macrophage inflammatory protein 1alpha attenuates the toxic effects of temozolomide in human bone marrow granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells.
Chang, J; Clemons, M; Dexter, TM; Heyworth, C; Howell, A; Lord, B; Margison, G; Testa, N; Watson, A, 2000
)
0.31
" Potentiation of cytotoxicity was obtained at concentrations of NU1025 and NU1085 that were not toxic per se; however, NU1085 alone was 3-fold more cytotoxic (LC50 values ranged from 83 to 94 microM) than NU1025 alone (LC50 > 900 microM)."( Potentiation of temozolomide and topotecan growth inhibition and cytotoxicity by novel poly(adenosine diphosphoribose) polymerase inhibitors in a panel of human tumor cell lines.
Calvert, AH; Curtin, NJ; Delaney, CA; Durkacz, BW; Hostomsky, Z; Kyle, S; Newell, DR; Wang, LZ; White, AW, 2000
)
0.31
"The DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) has been shown to protect cells from the toxic and mutagenic effect of alkylating agents by removing lesions from the O6 position of guanine."( Effect of O6-benzylguanine on alkylating agent-induced toxicity and mutagenicity. In Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing wild-type and mutant O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferases.
Cai, Y; Dolan, ME; Ludeman, SM; Pegg, AE; Wu, MH; Xu-Welliver, M, 2000
)
0.31
" Temozolomide was safe and well tolerated."( Safety and efficacy of temozolomide in patients with recurrent anaplastic oligodendrogliomas after standard radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Barrie, M; Braguer, D; Chinot, OL; Dufour, H; Figarella-Branger, D; Grisoli, F; Honore, S; Martin, PM; Muracciole, X, 2001
)
0.31
"Temozolomide is safe and effective in the treatment of recurrent AO and AOA."( Safety and efficacy of temozolomide in patients with recurrent anaplastic oligodendrogliomas after standard radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Barrie, M; Braguer, D; Chinot, OL; Dufour, H; Figarella-Branger, D; Grisoli, F; Honore, S; Martin, PM; Muracciole, X, 2001
)
0.31
" This study also analyzed the ratio of the toxic effect of TMZ on MNC and on tumor cells (i."( DNA repair enzymes and cytotoxic effects of temozolomide: comparative studies between tumor cells and normal cells of the immune system.
Alvino, E; Bonmassar, L; D'Atri, S; Falcinelli, S; Fuggetta, MP; Guadagni, F; Lacal, PM; Pagani, E; Passarelli, F; Pepponi, R; Prete, SP; Turriziani, M, 2003
)
0.32
"We have studied the toxic effect of the alkylating antitumor drug N'-cyclohexyl-N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-nitrosourea (lomustine, CCNU) on Escherichia coli (E."( Spin labeled antioxidants protect bacteria against the toxicity of alkylating antitumor drug CCNU.
Gadjeva, V; Lazarova, G; Zheleva, A, 2003
)
0.32
"Postoperative radiochemotherapy with 30-33 daily doses of temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)) is safe in patients with malignant glioma."( Efficacy and toxicity of postoperative temozolomide radiochemotherapy in malignant glioma.
Eich, HT; Kocher, M; Kunze, S; Müller, RP; Semrau, R, 2005
)
0.33
" In conclusion, there were no adverse effects of the ABVD regimen on the course of HCV infection in this patient who was successfully treated for HD."( No adverse effect of ABVD chemotherapy in a patient with chronic hepatitis C and Hodgkin's disease.
Donley, K; Grgurević, I; Kujundzić, M; Martinović, M; Pavletic, S; Pejsa, V; Stancić, V, 2004
)
0.32
" The mean toxic CD of doxorubicin was 170+/-33 mg/m2 (range 100-200; median 175) and the mean time of the onset EF decline was 13."( Echocardiographic evaluation of early and chronic cardiotoxicity in adult patients treated for Hodgkin's disease with ABVD regimen.
Elbl, L; Kral, Z; Navratil, M; Smardova, L; Vasova, I; Vorlicek, J, 2006
)
0.33
" Similar side effect intensity of BZA2 and dacarbazine was observed, whereas BZA1 was more toxic."( Alkylating benzamides with melanoma cytotoxicity: experimental chemotherapy in a mouse melanoma model.
Bauder-Wüst, U; Eisenhut, M; Eskerski, H; Haberkorn, U; Wolf, M, 2006
)
0.33
"This complex and highly toxic chemoimmunotherapeutic regimen should not be considered as standard therapy in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma."( Complex combination biochemotherapy regimen in advanced metastatic melanoma in a non-intensive care unit: toxicity or benefit?
Hofmann, MA; Sterry, W; Trefzer, U, 2007
)
0.34
" Four patients receiving HDC/IL-2/IFN and nine receiving DTIC experienced at least one grade 4 adverse event."( Results of a multicenter randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined immunotherapy with interleukin-2, interferon-{alpha}2b and histamine dihydrochloride versus dacarbazine in patients with stage IV melanoma.
Anderson, R; Burdette-Radoux, S; Gehlsen, K; Hauschild, A; Hellstrand, K; Middleton, M; Naredi, P; Thomson, D, 2007
)
0.34
" This study could provide an insight into the safe usage of DTIC."( Mechanism of UVA-dependent DNA damage induced by an antitumor drug dacarbazine in relation to its photogenotoxicity.
Hiraku, Y; Iwamoto, T; Kawanishi, S; Okuda, M, 2008
)
0.35
" CB related adverse events occurring in more than one patient were fatigue, gait disturbance, nystagmus, and confusion."( Convection-enhanced delivery of cintredekin besudotox (interleukin-13-PE38QQR) followed by radiation therapy with and without temozolomide in newly diagnosed malignant gliomas: phase 1 study of final safety results.
Asher, AL; Chang, SM; Croteau, D; Grahn, AY; Husain, SR; Kunwar, S; Lang, FF; Parker, K; Puri, RK; Sampson, JH; Shaffrey, M; Sherman, JW; Vogelbaum, MA, 2007
)
0.34
" Thus, the implantation of BCNU wafers prior to TMZ and radiotherapy appears safe in newly diagnosed GBM patients."( A retrospective study of the safety of BCNU wafers with concurrent temozolomide and radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients.
Mitchell, SB; Pan, E; Tsai, JS, 2008
)
0.35
" The adverse effects related with TMZ administration are divided in three categories: myelosuppression, non haematologic toxicity, and infections."( The safety of the temozolomide in patients with malignant glioma.
Dario, A; Tomei, G, 2006
)
0.33
" Although TMZ is generally safe and acute toxicity is well documented, there are limited data on long-term toxicities."( Long-term use of temozolomide: could you use temozolomide safely for life in gliomas?
Bell, D; Khasraw, M; Wheeler, H, 2009
)
0.35
" There were no toxic deaths."( Temozolomide: a safe and effective treatment for malignant digestive endocrine tumors.
Couvelard, A; Faivre, S; Hammel, P; Hentic, O; Larroque, B; Lévy, P; Maire, F; Raymond, E; Ruszniewski, P; Yapur, L; Zappa, M, 2009
)
0.35
" An understanding of structure-activity relationships (SARs) of chemicals can make a significant contribution to the identification of potential toxic effects early in the drug development process and aid in avoiding such problems."( Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
Fisk, L; Greene, N; Naven, RT; Note, RR; Patel, ML; Pelletier, DJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Three patients experienced a grade 4 adverse reaction; two pulmonary emboli and one cerebral ischemia."( Phase I safety study of lenalidomide and dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma previously untreated with systemic chemotherapy.
Bassett, R; Bedikian, A; Hwu, P; Hwu, WJ; Kim, KB; Knight, RD; Papadopoulos, NE; Patnana, M, 2010
)
0.36
"The primary objective of this augmental, prospective, uncontrolled phase II multicentre trial was to assess adverse events (AE) associated with malignant glioma resection using 5-aminolevulinic (5-ALA)."( Favorable outcome in the elderly cohort treated by concomitant temozolomide radiochemotherapy in a multicentric phase II safety study of 5-ALA.
Kern, BC; Krex, D; Mehdorn, HM; Nestler, U; Pichlmeier, U; Stockhammer, F; Stummer, W; Vince, GH, 2011
)
0.37
"The majority of patients with Hodgkin's disease can be cured by combination of polychemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) that can produce late toxic pulmonary and cardiac effects which often remain at a subclinical level."( Cardiopulmonary toxicity of different chemoradiotherapy combined regimens for Hodgkin's disease.
Bonfante, V; Busia, A; Laffranchi, A; Villani, F; Viviani, S, 2010
)
0.36
"These data confirm that the combination of mediastinal RT with the more commonly used polychemotherapy regimens produce late toxic effects."( Cardiopulmonary toxicity of different chemoradiotherapy combined regimens for Hodgkin's disease.
Bonfante, V; Busia, A; Laffranchi, A; Villani, F; Viviani, S, 2010
)
0.36
" When this regimen was administered to mice containing humanized bone marrow, flow cytometric analyses indicated that the human bone marrow cells were significantly more sensitive to treatment than the murine bone marrow cells and that the regimen was highly toxic to human-derived hematopoietic cells of all lineages (progenitor, lymphoid, and myeloid)."( Humanized bone marrow mouse model as a preclinical tool to assess therapy-mediated hematotoxicity.
Bailey, B; Baluyut, AR; Cai, S; Chan, RJ; Ernstberger, A; Goebel, WS; Jones, DR; Juliar, BE; Mayo, LD; Pollok, KE; Sinn, AL; Wang, H, 2011
)
0.37
"Temozolomide (TMZ) is a widely used oral alkylating agent that has been associated with the development of severe hematologic adverse events (HAEs)."( Hematologic adverse events associated with temozolomide.
Abdur, S; Bressler, LR; Letarte, N; Villano, JL; Yu, JM, 2012
)
0.38
" Although there is possibly an indication that metronomic regimens of TMZ result in better PFS and response rate when compared to the conventional standard 5 day regimen, insufficient available data and study heterogeneity preclude any safe conclusions."( Using different schedules of Temozolomide to treat low grade gliomas: systematic review of their efficacy and toxicity.
Athanasiou, T; Lashkari, HP; Moreno, L; Saso, S; Zacharoulis, S, 2011
)
0.37
"The results suggest that Cyberknife re-treatments are relatively safe using selected dose/fraction schemes."( Efficacy and toxicity of CyberKnife re-irradiation and "dose dense" temozolomide for recurrent gliomas.
Arpa, D; Cardali, S; Conti, A; De Renzis, C; Granata, F; Pontoriero, A; Romanelli, P; Siragusa, C; Tomasello, C; Tomasello, F, 2012
)
0.38
" The survival rate, progression-free survival, overall survival time and adverse reactions were observed."( [Efficacy and safety of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with temozolomide for glioma].
Tu, Q; Wang, L; Zhou, R; Zhou, W, 2011
)
0.37
"The adverse reactions were mild and tolerable."( [Efficacy and safety of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with temozolomide for glioma].
Tu, Q; Wang, L; Zhou, R; Zhou, W, 2011
)
0.37
" Magnetic resonance imaging and laboratory tests were performed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions."( [Safety and efficacy of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with temozolomide in treatment of diffuse brainstem gliomas].
Cai, CL; Fang, HH; Kang, JB; Li, FM; Nie, Q, 2011
)
0.37
" Hematotoxicity is listed as a frequent adverse drug reaction in the US prescribing information and hepatotoxicity has been reported infrequently in the postmarketing period."( Severe sustained cholestatic hepatitis following temozolomide in a patient with glioblastoma multiforme: case study and review of data from the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Bronder, E; Garbe, E; Herbst, H; Kauffmann, W; Klimpel, A; Orzechowski, HD; Sarganas, G; Thomae, M, 2012
)
0.38
"Conformal Radiation yields low grades of MRI assessed neurotoxicity and cognitive disturbance in patients of HGG with no adverse impact on local control and survival."( Survival outcome and neurotoxicity in patients of high-grade gliomas treated with conformal radiation and temozolamide.
Aggarwal, HN; Anand, AK; Babu, AG; Chaudhory, AR; Chaudhury, PS; Jena, A; Negi, PS; Rao, A; Sachdeva, PK; Sinha, SN,
)
0.13
"Combining Gliadel wafers and radiochemotherapy with TMZ may carry the risk of increased adverse events (AE)."( Safety and efficacy of Gliadel wafers for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma.
Anile, C; Balducci, M; Chiesa, S; De Bonis, P; Fiorentino, A; Maira, G; Mangiola, A; Pompucci, A, 2012
)
0.38
" The incidence of hematological adverse effects (AE) was recorded for all patients."( Toxicity and survival in primary glioblastoma patients treated with concomitant plus adjuvant temozolomide versus adjuvant temozolomide: results of a single-institution, retrospective, matched-pair analysis.
Bock, HC; Brück, W; Giese, A; Gutenberg, A; Reifenberger, G, 2013
)
0.39
"Current immunomodulatory agents for stage III and IV melanoma exert different mechanisms of action that manifest in distinct adverse events."( Severe adverse events from the treatment of advanced melanoma: a systematic review of severe side effects associated with ipilimumab, vemurafenib, interferon alfa-2b, dacarbazine and interleukin-2.
Armstrong, AW; Ma, C, 2014
)
0.4
"This systematic review aims to synthesize safety data from clinical trials on ipilimumab, vemurafenib, interferon (IFN) alfa-2b, dacarbazine and interleukin (IL)-2 to elucidate the severe adverse events associated with each melanoma therapy."( Severe adverse events from the treatment of advanced melanoma: a systematic review of severe side effects associated with ipilimumab, vemurafenib, interferon alfa-2b, dacarbazine and interleukin-2.
Armstrong, AW; Ma, C, 2014
)
0.4
" However severe hematologic adverse events (HAEs), including myelodysplastic syndrome and aplastic anemia, have also been reported."( Temozolomide-related hematologic toxicity.
De Sanctis, V; Enrici, RM; Minniti, G; Scaringi, C, 2013
)
0.39
"Central diabetes insipidus is a rare but reversible side effect of treatment with TMZ."( Central diabetes insipidus: a previously unreported side effect of temozolomide.
Faje, AT; Klibanski, A; Makimura, H; Miller, KK; Nachtigall, L; Wexler, D, 2013
)
0.39
" Although TMZ is considered to be a safe drug, it has been demonstrated to cause severe myelotoxicity; in particular, some case reports and small series studies have reported severe myelotoxicity developing during TMZ and concomitant RT."( Clinical and Genetic Factors Associated With Severe Hematological Toxicity in Glioblastoma Patients During Radiation Plus Temozolomide Treatment: A Prospective Study.
Amadori, A; Berti, F; Bertorelle, R; Della Puppa, A; Farina, P; Lombardi, G; Marcato, R; Rumiato, E; Sacchetto, V; Saggioro, D; Zagonel, V; Zustovich, F, 2015
)
0.42
" The evaluating indicators were overall response rate (ORR), 1-year survival rate, and several of the most frequent adverse events."( Efficacy and safety between temozolomide alone and temozolomide-based double therapy for malignant melanoma: a meta-analysis.
Jia, HY; Jiang, G; Lei, TC; Li, RH; Liu, YQ; Sun, C, 2014
)
0.4
" The aim of this study was to investigate the benefits and adverse effects of this combined therapy in elderly patients with glioblastoma."( Toxicity and outcome of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma: a retrospective study.
Mukasa, A; Narita, Y; Saito, K; Saito, N; Shibui, S; Shinoura, N; Tabei, Y, 2014
)
0.4
"To determine the frequency of ocular adverse effects associated with vemurafenib (PLX4032) treatment for metastatic cutaneous melanoma."( Ocular toxicity in BRAF mutant cutaneous melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib.
Amaravadi, RK; Caro, I; Choe, CH; Kempen, JH; McArthur, GA, 2014
)
0.4
"Among the 568 patients treated with vemurafenib, ocular adverse effects developed in 22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18."( Ocular toxicity in BRAF mutant cutaneous melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib.
Amaravadi, RK; Caro, I; Choe, CH; Kempen, JH; McArthur, GA, 2014
)
0.4
"Ocular adverse events and symptoms may be seen in more than one-fifth of patients being treated with vemurafenib."( Ocular toxicity in BRAF mutant cutaneous melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib.
Amaravadi, RK; Caro, I; Choe, CH; Kempen, JH; McArthur, GA, 2014
)
0.4
"8% of the 618 toxicities were Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 1 or 2, while 15."( Toxicity profile of temozolomide in the treatment of 300 malignant glioma patients in Korea.
Bae, SH; Cho, SY; Kim, CY; Kim, TM; Kim, YH; Kim, YJ; Lee, MM; Lee, SH; Park, CK; Park, MJ, 2014
)
0.4
" In this project, we evaluated the effects of silibinin, a natural plant component of milk thistle seeds, to potentiate toxic effects of chemotherapy drugs such as temozolomide, etoposide and irinotecan on LN229, U87 and A172 (P53 and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) -tumor suppressor-mutated) glioma cell lines."( The effect of silibinin in enhancing toxicity of temozolomide and etoposide in p53 and PTEN-mutated resistant glioma cell lines.
Elhag, R; Mazzio, EA; Soliman, KF, 2015
)
0.42
" The safety profiles were consistent with the well-characterized toxicities of both agents, and the most common grade 3 to 4 adverse effects were myelosuppression and transient elevation of transaminases in the trabectedin arm."( Efficacy and Safety of Trabectedin or Dacarbazine for Metastatic Liposarcoma or Leiomyosarcoma After Failure of Conventional Chemotherapy: Results of a Phase III Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial.
Dean, A; Demetri, GD; Elias, A; Ganjoo, K; Hensley, ML; Jones, RL; Khokhar, NZ; Knoblauch, RE; Maki, RG; Milhem, M; Parekh, TV; Park, YC; Patel, SR; Schuetze, SM; Spira, A; Staddon, A; Tawbi, H; Van Tine, BA; von Mehren, M, 2016
)
0.43
" BBBD temozolomide was toxic in the efficacy study, but there was no evidence of symptomatic neurotoxicity in rats given IA temozolomide."( Intra-arterial administration improves temozolomide delivery and efficacy in a model of intracerebral metastasis, but has unexpected brain toxicity.
Muldoon, LL; Netto, JP; Neuwelt, EA; Pagel, MA, 2016
)
0.43
" Data on adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout."( Bevacizumab, temozolomide, and radiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: comprehensive safety results during and after first-line therapy.
Chinot, OL; Cloughesy, T; Dhar, S; Garcia, J; Henriksson, R; Mason, W; Nishikawa, R; Pozzi, E; Saran, F; Wick, W, 2016
)
0.43
"3; combined relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for survival rates, response rates, and adverse events."( Meta-Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Interferon Combined With Dacarbazine Versus Dacarbazine Alone in Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma.
Hou, XY; Huang, Q; Jiang, G; Tang, JQ; Xin, Y; Yang, M; Zhang, LZ; Zhang, P, 2016
)
0.43
" Patients reported adverse effects in Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events diaries; recorded vomiting, nausea, and rescue medication use in diaries (which were used to assess cRINV-CR); and reported QoL 4 days/week using the Modified Functional Living Index-Emesis (M-FLIE) and Osoba nausea and vomiting/retching modules."( Phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous palonosetron (PAL) in primary malignant glioma (MG) patients receiving standard radiotherapy (RT) and concomitant temozolomide (TMZ).
Affronti, ML; Allen, K; Desjardins, A; Friedman, HS; Healy, PN; Herndon, JE; Kirkpatrick, J; McSherry, F; Peters, KB; Vredenburgh, JJ; Woodring, S, 2016
)
0.43
"Single-dose weekly PAL is a safe and tolerable antiemetic for cRINV prevention in MG patients receiving standard RT and concomitant TMZ."( Phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous palonosetron (PAL) in primary malignant glioma (MG) patients receiving standard radiotherapy (RT) and concomitant temozolomide (TMZ).
Affronti, ML; Allen, K; Desjardins, A; Friedman, HS; Healy, PN; Herndon, JE; Kirkpatrick, J; McSherry, F; Peters, KB; Vredenburgh, JJ; Woodring, S, 2016
)
0.43
"Many adverse drug reactions are caused by the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent activation of drugs into reactive metabolites."( Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
Jones, LH; Nadanaciva, S; Rana, P; Will, Y, 2016
)
0.43
" Commenced 15 years ago, PRRT is now becoming established as first- and second-line therapy for gastroentero pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs), and early treatment minimizes myelotoxicity, which is the most significant potential adverse event following PRRT."( Myelotoxicity of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Decade of Experience.
Kesavan, M; Turner, JH, 2016
)
0.43
" Nausea was the most common side effect (31 %), only one case (1."( Low dose DTIC is effective and safe in pretreated patients with well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.
Gress, TM; Krug, S; Majumder, M; Mueller, D; Rinke, A, 2016
)
0.43
" The most common treatment emergent adverse events were ocular: blurred vision, dry eye, keratitis, photophobia, and eye pain."( Efficacy and safety results of ABT-414 in combination with radiation and temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Ansell, P; Fichtel, L; Fischer, J; Gan, HK; Gomez, E; Holen, KD; Kumthekar, P; Lassman, AB; Lee, HJ; Mandich, H; Merrell, R; Munasinghe, W; Reardon, DA; Roberts-Rapp, L; Scott, AM; Sulman, EP; van den Bent, M; Xiong, H, 2017
)
0.46
" We aimed to determine whether or not pulse high-dose lapatinib was a safe and tolerable regimen in addition to standard therapy."( Report of safety of pulse dosing of lapatinib with temozolomide and radiation therapy for newly-diagnosed glioblastoma in a pilot phase II study.
Cloughesy, TF; Faiq, N; Green, R; Green, S; Hu, J; Lai, A; Mellinghoff, I; Nghiemphu, PL; Yu, A, 2017
)
0.46
"Extended cycles of temozolomide are safe and feasible for Chinese patients with disease responsive to temozolomide."( Feasibility and safety of extended adjuvant temozolomide beyond six cycles for patients with glioblastoma.
Chan, DT; Hsieh, SY; Kam, MK; Loong, HH; Ng, SC; Poon, DM; Poon, WS; Tsang, WK, 2017
)
0.46
" This review summarizes the mechanism of action, efficacy, and adverse events based on pre-clinical studies and clinical trials for TTF in GBM."( Tumor treating fields: a novel and effective therapy for glioblastoma: mechanism, efficacy, safety and future perspectives.
Zhu, JJ; Zhu, P, 2017
)
0.46
" For recurrent GBM, the efficacy of TTF monotherapy was shown to be equivalent in PFS and OS without systemic adverse events when compared to the control group that received best physicians-chosen chemotherapies (EF-11 trial)."( Tumor treating fields: a novel and effective therapy for glioblastoma: mechanism, efficacy, safety and future perspectives.
Zhu, JJ; Zhu, P, 2017
)
0.46
"Radiochemotherapy involving cisplatinum-based polychemotherapy is more toxic than radiotherapy in combination with temozolomide."( Concurrent radiotherapy with temozolomide vs. concurrent radiotherapy with a cisplatinum-based polychemotherapy regimen : Acute toxicity in pediatric high-grade glioma patients.
Bison, B; Bojko, S; Gielen, GH; Hoffmann, M; Kortmann, RD; Kramm, CM; Pietsch, T; Seidel, C; von Bueren, AO; Warmuth-Metz, M, 2018
)
0.48
" Compelling clinical data also support the safety of carmustine wafer implantation (grade A recommendation) in these patients and suggest that observed adverse events can be avoided in experienced neurosurgeon hands."( Carmustine wafer implantation for high-grade gliomas: Evidence-based safety efficacy and practical recommendations from the Neuro-oncology Club of the French Society of Neurosurgery.
Caire, F; Guyotat, J; Menei, P; Metellus, P; Pallud, J; Roux, A, 2017
)
0.46
" The observation index of both groups included the short- and long-term clinical efficacies, improvement of symptoms and signs, quality of life (QOL), and adverse responses."( Efficacy and safety of temozolomide plus whole-brain radiotherapy in the treatment of intracranial metastases.
Liu, HP; Wang, JW; Zheng, KB, 2017
)
0.46
" Although temozolomide is generally a well tolerated drug, with rare severe toxic effects, sometimes certain toxicities can overcome the life risk of the underlying malignancy."( Severe hematologic temozolomide-related toxicity and lifethreatening infections.
Nikitovic, M; Stepanovic, A,
)
0.13
"Treatments for advanced melanoma are associated with different adverse events (AEs), which may be costly to manage."( Direct costs associated with adverse events of systemic therapies for advanced melanoma: Systematic literature review.
Chmielowski, B; Copley-Merriman, C; Liu, FX; Mauskopf, J; Stevinson, K; Wang, J; Zimovetz, EA, 2018
)
0.48
"CAPTEM is effective and relatively safe for treating patients with advanced NENs."( Safety and efficacy of combining capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) to treat advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms: A meta-analysis.
Fu, W; Li, W; Lu, L; Lu, Y; Lv, W; Wang, J; Zhao, Z, 2018
)
0.48
" We retrieved evidence on treatment-related grade III/IV adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)."( A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety outcomes in advanced melanoma.
Franken, MG; Gheorghe, M; Haanen, JBAG; Leeneman, B; Uyl-de Groot, CA; van Baal, PHM, 2019
)
0.51
"Patient data for multiple cardiac-related treatment-emergent adverse events (cTEAEs) were evaluated in pooled analyses of ten phase 2 trials, one phase 3 trial in STS (n = 982), and two phase 3 trials in ROC (n = 1231)."( Cardiac safety of trabectedin monotherapy or in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with sarcomas and ovarian cancer.
Coleman, RL; Demetri, GD; Herzog, TJ; Hu, P; Jones, RL; Knoblauch, R; McGowan, T; Monk, BJ; Patel, SR; Schuetze, SM; Shalaby, W; Triantos, S; Van Tine, BA; von Mehren, M, 2021
)
0.62
" Its longitudinal variations may discriminate between highly and minimally toxic protocols regarding ovarian function."( Longitudinal study of AMH variations in 122 Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) and non-AYA lymphoma patients to evaluate the chemo-induced ovarian toxicity to further personalise fertility preservation counselling.
Barbatti, M; Behal, H; Bruno, B; Decanter, C; Delepine, J; Labreuche, J; Manier, S; Morschhauser, F; Pigny, P; Robin, C, 2021
)
0.62
" In addition, OS, PFS and adverse event (AE) data on ndGBM and recurrent GBM (rGBM) were assessed."( Comparative efficacy and safety of therapeutics for elderly glioblastoma patients: A Bayesian network analysis.
Li, H; Ma, W; Qu, T; Wang, Y; Wu, J; Xia, Y; Xing, H; Zhao, B, 2022
)
0.72
" The most common adverse events were leukocytopenia (66."( Safety and Efficacy of Anlotinib Hydrochloride Plus Temozolomide in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma.
Bu, L; Cai, J; Chen, Q; Huang, K; Meng, X; Weng, Y; Xu, Q; Zhan, R; Zhang, L; Zheng, X, 2023
)
0.91

Pharmacokinetics

The current phase I study investigates the effects of sorafenib on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of dacarbazine and its metabolite 5-amino-imidazole-4-carboxamide (AIC) Our results provide a solid pharmacokinetics basis for considering subconjunctivally administered dacarbazine in the treatment of human ocular melanoma.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Our results provide a solid pharmacokinetic basis for considering subconjunctivally administered dacarbazine in the treatment of human ocular melanoma."( Ocular pharmacokinetics of dacarbazine following subconjunctival versus intravenous administration in the rabbit.
Kalsi, GS; Rootman, J; Silver, HK, 1991
)
0.28
" The reproducibility of the intra-arterial techniques was established by the repeated pharmacokinetic analysis."( Tourniquet infusion chemotherapy of the lower extremities--clinical and pharmacokinetic results.
Eksborg, S; Ingvar, C; Jönsson, PE; Stigsson, L, 1989
)
0.28
" The plasma disappearance of DTIC was biphasic, with a terminal half-life of 41."( Pharmacokinetics of dacarbazine (DTIC) and its metabolite 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide (AIC) following different dose schedules.
Aigner, K; Breithaupt, H; Dammann, A, 1982
)
0.26
" The half-life of the drug in the tumors was approximately 60 min."( Pharmacokinetics of the 13C labeled anticancer agent temozolomide detected in vivo by selective cross-polarization transfer.
Artemov, D; Bhujwalla, ZM; Glickson, JD; Griffiths, JR; Judson, IR; Leach, MO; Maxwell, RJ, 1995
)
0.29
"A pharmacokinetic study was undertaken in six patients with melanoma of an extremity who were undergoing hyperthermic isolation perfusion with DTIC in order to understand better its clinical pharmacokinetics."( Pharmacokinetics of dacarbazine in the regional perfusion of extremities with melanoma.
Buda, BS; Didolkar, MS; Fitzpatrick, JL; Jackson, AJ; Johnston, GS; Lesko, LJ; Zech, LA, 1996
)
0.29
"We conclude that spectral analysis provides important pharmacokinetic information about radiolabeled anti-cancer drugs with relatively few model assumptions."( Pharmacokinetic assessment of novel anti-cancer drugs using spectral analysis and positron emission tomography: a feasibility study.
Brock, CS; Cunningham, VJ; Harte, RJ; Jones, T; Matthews, JC; Meikle, SR; Price, P; Wells, P, 1998
)
0.3
" Plasma samples were obtained on days 1 and 2 to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of TMZ alone and in combination with CDDP."( A Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of temozolomide and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid malignancies.
Agarwala, SS; Baker, SD; Barrington, R; Britten, CD; Diab, SG; Eckardt, JR; Eckhardt, SG; Fraass, U; Hammond, LA; Johnson, T; Rowinsky, EK; Statkevich, P; Villalona-Calero, M; Von Hoff, DD, 1999
)
0.3
"Fifteen patients with advanced cancer were enrolled of which 12 were evaluable, all of whom had pharmacokinetic blood sampling."( Effect of gastric pH on the relative oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of temozolomide.
Beale, P; Brada, M; Cutler, DL; Judson, I; Marco, A; Moore, S; Reidenberg, P; Statkevich, P, 1999
)
0.3
" There was no difference in the pharmacokinetic parameters of temozolomide or MTIC with or without the concomitant administration of ranitidine."( Effect of gastric pH on the relative oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of temozolomide.
Beale, P; Brada, M; Cutler, DL; Judson, I; Marco, A; Moore, S; Reidenberg, P; Statkevich, P, 1999
)
0.3
" The 5-day schedule appears less toxic, and pharmacokinetic studies show that it provides greater exposure to MTIC and HMMTIC compared to the one-day schedule."( A randomized phase II and pharmacokinetic study of dacarbazine in patients with recurrent glioma.
Ames, MM; Buckner, JC; Hatfield, AK; Johnson, PS; Krook, JE; Morton, RF; Nair, S; Novotny, PJ; Rajkumar, SV; Reid, JM; Safgren, SL; Scheithauer, BW, 2000
)
0.31
" Statistical analyses of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic end points in the control and TNP-470 treatment groups were completed by nonparametric tests."( Pharmacodynamic-mediated reduction of temozolomide tumor concentrations by the angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470.
Chu, J; Gallo, JM; Li, S; Ma, J; Pulfer, S; Reed, K, 2001
)
0.31
" DTIC and AIC exhibited biphasic clearance from the blood, consistent with a 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model."( Pharmacokinetic, biochemical and clinical effects of dimethyltriazenoimidazole-4-carboxamide-bischloroethylnitrosourea combination therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.
Clemons, M; El Teraifi, H; Griffiths, A; Howell, A; Kelly, J; Margison, GP; Margison, JM; Morris, CQ; Ranson, M, 2003
)
0.32
" It is proposed that the net balance of antiangiogenic drug-mediated pharmacodynamic actions will determine how drug disposition in tumors may be affected."( Pharmacodynamic-mediated effects of the angiogenesis inhibitor SU5416 on the tumor disposition of temozolomide in subcutaneous and intracerebral glioma xenograft models.
Gallo, JM; Guo, P; Li, S; Ma, J; Reed, K, 2003
)
0.32
"To construct a population pharmacokinetic model for temozolomide (TMZ), a novel imidazo-tetrazine methylating agent and its metabolites MTIC and AIC in infants and children with primary central nervous system tumors."( Population pharmacokinetics of temozolomide and metabolites in infants and children with primary central nervous system tumors.
Fouladi, M; Gajjar, A; Heideman, RL; Kirstein, MN; Nair, G; Panetta, JC; Stewart, CF; Wilkinson, M, 2003
)
0.32
"We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of TMZ and MTIC in 39 children (20 boys and 19 girls) with 132 pharmacokinetic studies (109 in the training set and 23 in the validation set)."( Population pharmacokinetics of temozolomide and metabolites in infants and children with primary central nervous system tumors.
Fouladi, M; Gajjar, A; Heideman, RL; Kirstein, MN; Nair, G; Panetta, JC; Stewart, CF; Wilkinson, M, 2003
)
0.32
"To characterize and compare pharmacokinetic parameters in children and adults treated with temozolomide (TMZ) administered for 5 days in three doses daily, and to evaluate the possible relationship between AUC values and hematologic toxicity."( Pharmacokinetics of temozolomide given three times a day in pediatric and adult patients.
Barone, C; Caldarelli, M; Cefalo, G; Garrè, ML; Lazzareschi, I; Madon, E; Maira, G; Massimino, M; Mastrangelo, S; Mazzarella, G; Riccardi, A; Riccardi, R; Ridola, V; Ruggiero, A; Sandri, A, 2003
)
0.32
"TMZ pharmacokinetic parameters were characterized in pediatric and adult patients with primary central nervous system tumors treated with doses ranging from 120 to 200 mg/m2 per day, divided into three doses daily for 5 days."( Pharmacokinetics of temozolomide given three times a day in pediatric and adult patients.
Barone, C; Caldarelli, M; Cefalo, G; Garrè, ML; Lazzareschi, I; Madon, E; Maira, G; Massimino, M; Mastrangelo, S; Mazzarella, G; Riccardi, A; Riccardi, R; Ridola, V; Ruggiero, A; Sandri, A, 2003
)
0.32
"No difference appears to exist between pharmacokinetic parameters in adults and children when TMZ is administered in three doses daily."( Pharmacokinetics of temozolomide given three times a day in pediatric and adult patients.
Barone, C; Caldarelli, M; Cefalo, G; Garrè, ML; Lazzareschi, I; Madon, E; Maira, G; Massimino, M; Mastrangelo, S; Mazzarella, G; Riccardi, A; Riccardi, R; Ridola, V; Ruggiero, A; Sandri, A, 2003
)
0.32
" In total, 18 blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis (maximum plasma concentration, area under the concentration-time curve and total clearance) of D and F at 14 time points during therapy."( Preliminary study on pharmacokinetics of dacarbazine and fotemustine in glioblastoma multiforme patients does not indicate gender-specific differences.
Fazeny-Dörner, B; Mader, RM; Marosi, C; Piribauer, M; Rizovski, B; Stögermaier, B, 2004
)
0.32
" The population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with nonlinear mixed-effect modeling software."( Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid population pharmacokinetics of temozolomide in malignant glioma patients.
Buclin, T; Csajka, C; Decosterd, LA; Lejeune, F; Leyvraz, S; Ostermann, S; Stupp, R, 2004
)
0.32
"This is the first human pharmacokinetic study on TMZ to quantify CSF penetration."( Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid population pharmacokinetics of temozolomide in malignant glioma patients.
Buclin, T; Csajka, C; Decosterd, LA; Lejeune, F; Leyvraz, S; Ostermann, S; Stupp, R, 2004
)
0.32
" To that end, a novel method, based on physiologically based hybrid pharmacokinetic models, is presented to predict human tumor drug concentrations."( Pharmacokinetic model-predicted anticancer drug concentrations in human tumors.
Bookman, MA; Gallo, JM; Guo, P; Li, S; Ma, J; Orlansky, A; Pulfer, S; Vicini, P; Zhou, F, 2004
)
0.32
"To develop a pharmacokinetic limited sampling model (LSM) for temozolomide and its metabolite MTIC in infants and children."( Development of a pharmacokinetic limited sampling model for temozolomide and its active metabolite MTIC.
Freeman, BB; Gajjar, A; Iacono, LC; Kirstein, MN; Nair, G; Panetta, JC; Stewart, CF, 2005
)
0.33
" This accounted for prior distribution of temozolomide and MTIC pharmacokinetic parameters based on full pharmacokinetic sampling from 38 patients with 120 pharmacokinetic studies (dosage range 145-200 mg/m(2) per day orally)."( Development of a pharmacokinetic limited sampling model for temozolomide and its active metabolite MTIC.
Freeman, BB; Gajjar, A; Iacono, LC; Kirstein, MN; Nair, G; Panetta, JC; Stewart, CF, 2005
)
0.33
" Furthermore, PARP activity was not inhibited by temozolomide treatment and this newly validated pharmacodynamic assay is therefore suitable for use in a proof-of-principle phase I trial a PARP-1 inhibitor in combination with temozolomide."( Temozolomide pharmacodynamics in patients with metastatic melanoma: dna damage and activity of repair enzymes O6-alkylguanine alkyltransferase and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1.
Boddy, AV; Calvert, AH; Curtin, NJ; Harris, AL; Hickson, I; Jones, C; Margison, GP; McGown, G; McHugh, P; Middleton, MR; Newell, DR; Olsen, A; Plummer, ER; Thorncroft, M; Watson, AJ, 2005
)
0.33
" Although this approach is promising, there has not been any attempt to define optimal metronomic dosing regimens by integrating pharmacokinetic (PK) with pharmacodynamic (PD) measurements."( Preclinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of metronomic and conventional temozolomide dosing regimens.
Gallo, JM; Guo, P; Nuthalapati, S; Wang, X; Zhou, Q, 2007
)
0.34
" Antibiotic peak concentration in blood decreased by 55%, doxorubicin circulated several times longer, and the area under the concentration-time curve increased 5 times if compared with standard doxorubicin administration."( Doxorubicin pharmacokinetics in lymphoma patients treated with doxorubicin-loaded eythrocytes.
Ataullakhanov, FI; Galkina, NM; Kulikova, EV; Medvedev, PV; Pivnik, AV; Skorokhod, O; Vitvitsky, VM; Zybunova, EE, 2007
)
0.34
" Because significant obstacles prevent making these measurements in humans, development of a predictive pharmacokinetic model would be of great value to the translation of preclinical data to the clinic."( Predicting human tumor drug concentrations from a preclinical pharmacokinetic model of temozolomide brain disposition.
Gallo, JM; Guo, P; Kruh, GD; Vicini, P; Wang, X; Zhou, Q, 2007
)
0.34
" The resultant data provided the framework to develop a hybrid physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for temozolomide in brain."( Predicting human tumor drug concentrations from a preclinical pharmacokinetic model of temozolomide brain disposition.
Gallo, JM; Guo, P; Kruh, GD; Vicini, P; Wang, X; Zhou, Q, 2007
)
0.34
"A physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approach offers a means to translate preclinical to clinical characteristics of drug disposition in target tissues and, thus, a means to select appropriate drug dosing regimens for achieving optimal target tissue drug concentrations."( Predicting human tumor drug concentrations from a preclinical pharmacokinetic model of temozolomide brain disposition.
Gallo, JM; Guo, P; Kruh, GD; Vicini, P; Wang, X; Zhou, Q, 2007
)
0.34
"The pharmacokinetic and safety profile of TMZ in Japanese patients was comparable to that in Caucasians."( Pharmacokinetic study of temozolomide on a daily-for-5-days schedule in Japanese patients with relapsed malignant gliomas: first study in Asians.
Adachi, J; Aoki, T; Matsutani, M; Mishima, K; Mizutani, T; Nishikawa, R; Nojima, K, 2007
)
0.34
" The mean clearance of temozolomide was 107 mL/min/m2, with a volume of distribution of 20 L/m2 and half-life of 109 minutes."( Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of temozolomide in pediatric patients with refractory or recurrent leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group Study.
Adamson, PC; Berg, SL; Blaney, SM; Delaney, SM; Dolan, ME; Hedge, M; Horton, TM; Ingle, AM; Thompson, PA; Weiss, HL; Wu, MF, 2007
)
0.34
" Pharmacokinetic analyses revealed lowered exposures and enhanced clearance among patients on EIAEDs."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of dose-intensive imatinib mesylate plus temozolomide: phase 1 trial in adults with malignant glioma.
Desjardins, A; Egorin, MJ; Friedman, AH; Friedman, HS; Gururangan, S; Herndon, JE; Lagattuta, TF; McLendon, R; Quinn, JA; Reardon, DA; Rich, JN; Salvado, AJ; Sathornsumetee, S; Vredenburgh, JJ, 2008
)
0.35
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
"We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib as a single agent and in combination with temozolomide in children with refractory solid tumors."( Pediatric phase I and pharmacokinetic study of erlotinib followed by the combination of erlotinib and temozolomide: a Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Study.
Adamson, PC; Blaney, SM; Dancey, JE; Gilbertson, RJ; Hamilton, M; Ingle, AM; Jakacki, RI; Krailo, MD; Tersak, J; Voss, SD, 2008
)
0.35
" Pharmacokinetic studies and ERBB-receptor expression and signaling studies were performed."( Pediatric phase I and pharmacokinetic study of erlotinib followed by the combination of erlotinib and temozolomide: a Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Study.
Adamson, PC; Blaney, SM; Dancey, JE; Gilbertson, RJ; Hamilton, M; Ingle, AM; Jakacki, RI; Krailo, MD; Tersak, J; Voss, SD, 2008
)
0.35
"The enhanced hematologic toxicity resulting from combining O(6)BG with temozolomide does not appear to be the result of a pharmacokinetic interaction between the agents."( Pharmacokinetics of temozolomide administered in combination with O6-benzylguanine in children and adolescents with refractory solid tumors.
Aikin, AA; Balis, FM; Cole, DE; Fox, E; Meany, HJ; Warren, KE, 2009
)
0.35
" The current phase I study investigates the effects of sorafenib on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of dacarbazine and its metabolite 5-amino-imidazole-4-carboxamide (AIC)."( Pharmacokinetic results of a phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with dacarbazine in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Armand, JP; Brendel, E; Lathia, C; Ludwig, M; Robert, C; Ropert, S; Soria, JC, 2011
)
0.37
"Intraindividual comparative pharmacokinetic data were obtained for doxorubicin and paclitaxel/platinum in three and two baboons, respectively."( Pharmacokinetics of chemotherapeutic agents in pregnancy: a preclinical and clinical study.
Amant, F; Chai, D; de Bruijn, E; de Hoon, J; Delforge, M; Halaska, M; Heyns, L; Noens, L; Ottevanger, N; Renard, V; Rob, L; Van Bree, R; Van Calsteren, K; Verbesselt, R; Witteveen, E, 2010
)
0.36
" This method was used successfully to perform brain and plasma pharmacokinetic studies of temozolomide in mice after intraperitoneal administration."( Development of a new UPLC-MSMS method for the determination of temozolomide in mice: application to plasma pharmacokinetics and brain distribution study.
Farinotti, R; Fernandez, C; Goldwirt, L; Zahr, N, 2013
)
0.39
"Cabozantinib at a dose of 40 mg daily with RT plus TMZ and post-RT TMZ for patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma was generally well tolerated, and demonstrated no pharmacokinetic interactions with concurrent TMZ."( Phase 1 dose escalation trial of the safety and pharmacokinetics of cabozantinib concurrent with temozolomide and radiotherapy or temozolomide after radiotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with high-grade gliomas.
Chamberlain, MC; Cloughesy, T; Desjardins, A; Glantz, M; Mikkelsen, T; Reardon, DA; Schiff, D; Wen, PY, 2016
)
0.43
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using non-compartmental analysis."( Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of select chemotherapeutic agents following intranasal delivery in a non-human primate model.
Cruz, R; Figg, WD; League-Pascual, JC; Lester-McCully, CM; Peer, CJ; Rodgers, L; Ronner, L; Shandilya, S; Warren, KE, 2017
)
0.46

Compound-Compound Interactions

Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor of Raf and several growth factor receptors, is under investigation in combination with dacarbazine, a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of many cancers. This work presents a biocompatible and tumor acidic environmental responsive CCM-camouflaged mesoporous silica nanoparticle.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" In the first phase, 14 patients (Group A) with progressive neurologic dysfunction following primary treatment were treated with DTIC alone (8 patients) or in combination with CCNU or methyl CCNU (6 patients) and evaluated for change in neurologic status."( Treatment of grade III and IV astrocytoma with dimethyl triazeno imidazole carboxamide (DTIC, NSC-45388) alone and in combination with CCNU (NSC-79037) or methyl CCNU (MeCCNU, NSC-95441).
Baxter, D; Cunningham, TJ; Horton, J; Nelson, L; Olson, KB; Rosenbaum, C; Sponzo, RW; Taylor, SG, 1975
)
0.25
"Twenty-one patients with disseminated malignant melanoma were treated with cis-dichlorodiammine-platinum(II) (cis-DDP): ten with cis-DDP alone at a dose of 20 mg/m2 iv x 4 days every 4 weeks and 11 with cis-DDP at a dose of 15 mg/m2 iv x 4 days combined with DTIC at a dose of 200 mg/m2 iv x 5 days every 4 weeks."( Cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum(II) alone and combined with DTIC for treatment of disseminated malignant melanoma.
Eilber, FR; Goodnight, JE; Morton, DL; Moseley, HS; Sarna, G,
)
0.13
" Data from other centers have shown that augmentation of remissions for melanoma patients occurred when BCG was combined with DTIC, vincristine, and allogeneic tumor cells."( Bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy in combination with DTIC (NSC-45388) for the treatment of malignant melanoma.
Burgess, MA; Gottlieb, J; Gutterman, JU; Hersh, EM; Mavligit, GM; Reed, R, 1976
)
0.26
" Hydroxyurea, antimetabolite, showed a time-dependent inhibition of CFE, and the combination with Ceph enhanced CFE inhibition by 29%, which is stable and independent of the treatment time."( [Enhancement of the effects of anticancer agents on B16 melanoma cells by combination with cepharanthine--II. Antimetabolite, alkylating agent, nitrosourea].
Kubota, K; Kubota, R; Yamada, S, 1992
)
0.28
" This provides a framework for future combinations of chemotherapy with rIL-2 alone or in combination with other biologic response modifiers in an outpatient setting."( A phase I-II study of dacarbazine in combination with outpatient interleukin-2 in metastatic malignant melanoma.
Bradley, EC; Chabot, GG; Flaherty, LE; Gualdoni, SM; Heilbrun, LK; Martino, S; Redman, BG; Valdivieso, M, 1990
)
0.28
" To establish in vivo models for chemoimmunotherapy trials, we investigated IL-2 alone and in combination with dacarbazine (DTIC) and adriamycin."( Antitumor efficacy of interleukin-2 alone and in combination with adriamycin and dacarbazine in murine solid tumor systems.
Aukerman, SL; Biernat, L; Corbett, TH; LoRusso, PM; Polin, L; Redman, BG; Valdivieso, M, 1990
)
0.28
" It is noteworthy that in all subsets, ABVD (Adriamycin + bleomycin + vinblastine + dacarbazine), either combined with irradiation or alternated with MOPP (mechlorethamine + vincristine + procarbazine + prednisone), yielded superior results compared with MOPP with or without irradiation."( Prognosis of bulky Hodgkin's disease treated with chemotherapy alone or combined with radiotherapy.
Bonadonna, G; Santoro, A; Valagussa, P, 1985
)
0.27
"A randomized phase II study of AMSA (amsacrine) alone and AMSA combined with DTIC (dacarbazine) was carried out in 31 and 39 patients with metastatic melanoma respectively."( Phase II study of AMSA alone and in combination with DTIC in patients with metastatic melanoma.
Benjamin, RS; Bodey, GP; Burgess, AM; Legha, SS; Polyzos, A, 1988
)
0.27
" Recombinant interferon alfa-2a in combination with chemotherapy is now being used in trials and the early results are encouraging."( Recombinant interferon alfa-2a in advanced malignant melanoma. A phase I-II study in combination with DTIC.
Hersey, P; McLeod, GR; Thomson, DB, 1987
)
0.27
"To define the activity of an individually escalated dacarbazine (DTIC) dose combined with interferon-alpha-2a (IFN), granulocyte-colony stimulating-factor (G-CSF) and ondansetron, 20 patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma were treated with DTIC, ondansetron 8 mg iv, G-CSF 300 micrograms sc and IFN 9 MU sc."( Dose escalation of dacarbazine combined with interferon alpha-2a, G-CSF and ondansetron in patients with metastatic melanoma.
Buter, J; de Vries, EG; Mulder, NH; Schraffordt Koops, H; Sleijfer, DT; van der Graaf, WT; Willemse, PH,
)
0.13
"The antitumor and antimetastatic activity of dacarbazine (DTIC) alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide (CY) was tested in C57BL/6 mice bearing Lewis lung carcinoma (3LL)."( Antitumor and antimetastatic effects of dacarbazine combined with cyclophosphamide and interleukin-2 in Lewis lung carcinoma (3LL).
Bonmassar, E; Leonetti, C; Lozupone, F; Tentori, L, 1995
)
0.29
"Recent data have shown that the in vitro and in vivo cytotoxicity of bioreductive drugs could be significantly increased when combined with chemotherapy drugs such as cisplatinum, depending on the timing of administration."( The effect of tirapazamine (SR-4233) alone or combined with chemotherapeutic agents on xenografted human tumours.
Guichard, M; Lartigau, E, 1996
)
0.29
"Biochemotherapy, which uses recombinant interferon alpha (rIFN-alpha) and recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) in combination with chemotherapy is a promising therapy for metastatic malignant melanoma."( Durable complete responses in metastatic melanoma treated with interleukin-2 in combination with interferon alpha and chemotherapy.
Legha, SS, 1997
)
0.3
" The analysis of cell cycle indicated that the drug combination of TZM and PADPRP inhibitors provoked G1 arrest only in p53+ cells."( Role of wild-type p53 on the antineoplastic activity of temozolomide alone or combined with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase.
Benincasa, E; Bonmassar, E; Faraoni, I; Franco, D; Graziani, G; Lacal, PM; Tentori, L, 1998
)
0.3
" AGT depleting agents in combination with methylating and chloroethylating agents are now in clinical testing, and may result in greater clinical efficacy in metastatic malignant melanoma."( New cytotoxic agents for the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma: temozolomide and related alkylating agents in combination with guanine analogues to abrogate drug resistance.
Gerson, S; Liu, L; Spiro, T,
)
0.13
"The activity of temozolomide combined with irinotecan (CPT-11) was evaluated against eight independent xenografts (four neuroblastomas, three rhabdomyosarcomas, and one glioblastoma)."( Antitumor activity of temozolomide combined with irinotecan is partly independent of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and mismatch repair phenotypes in xenograft models.
Brent, TP; Cheshire, PJ; Friedman, HS; Houghton, PJ; Kirstein, MN; Poquette, CA; Richmond, LB; Stewart, CF; Tan, M, 2000
)
0.31
" Preclinical and phase I trials have shown the additive or synergistic activity of temozolomide combined with carmustine against solid tumors, including malignant glioma, and the sequence-dependent effects of the combination."( Temozolomide in combination with other cytotoxic agents.
Prados, M, 2001
)
0.31
"Alternating COPP/ABVD and rapid alternating COPP/ABV/IMEP in combination with extended-field radiotherapy are equally effective in intermediate-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma and produce excellent long-term treatment results."( Rapidly alternating COPP/ABV/IMEP is not superior to conventional alternating COPP/ABVD in combination with extended-field radiotherapy in intermediate-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: final results of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group Trial HD5.
Anselmo, AP; Brosteanu, O; Diehl, V; Doelken, G; Duehmke, E; Engert, A; Franklin, J; Georgii, A; Greil, R; Hasenclever, D; Herrmann, R; Josting, A; Kirchner, H; Koch, P; Koch, T; Lathan, B; Loeffler, M; Munker, R; Paulus, U; Pfistner, B; Pfreundschuh, M; Rueffer, U; Schalk, KP; Sieber, M; Tesch, H; Wolf, J, 2002
)
0.31
" These results indicate that a careful selection of the antitumor agent has to be made when antitelomerase therapy is combined with chemotherapy."( Inhibition of telomerase increases resistance of melanoma cells to temozolomide, but not to temozolomide combined with poly (adp-ribose) polymerase inhibitor.
Balduzzi, A; Barbarino, M; Biroccio, A; Gold, B; Graziani, G; Levati, L; Lombardi, ML; Portarena, I; Tentori, L; Vergati, M, 2003
)
0.32
" Therefore, the authors initiated a Phase I study to determine the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of temozolomide (TMZ), a novel oral alkylating agent known to cross the blood-brain barrier, in combination with interferon alpha-2b (IFN-alpha2b)."( Temozolomide in combination with interferon alpha-2b in patients with metastatic melanoma: a phase I dose-escalation study.
Agarwala, SS; Kirkwood, JM, 2003
)
0.32
"A novel somatostatin analogue, TT-232 (which inhibits the proliferation of various cell cultures and transplantable mouse tumours), was examined regarding its effect on human melanoma and lymphoma xenografts as a single treatment or in combination with DTIC (dacarbazine) and etoposide."( Effect of a novel somatostatin analogue combined with cytotoxic drugs on human tumour xenografts and metastasis of B16 melanoma.
Bökönyi, G; Horváth, A; Kéri, G; Szende, B, 2003
)
0.32
"This EORTC multicentre study analysed the efficacy and tolerability in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma of BOLD chemotherapy in combination with recombinant interferon alpha-2b."( Bleomycin, vincristine, lomustine and dacarbazine (BOLD) in combination with recombinant interferon alpha-2b for metastatic uveal melanoma.
Gore, M; Hahka-Kemppinen, M; Hansson, J; Humblet, Y; Kivelä, T; Kloke, O; Kruit, WH; Kumpulainen, E; Parvinen, LM; Pyrhönen, S; Suciu, S; Vuoristo, MS, 2003
)
0.32
" This phase I study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TMZ alone (course 1) and TMZ in combination with PCB in subsequent courses in chemotherapy-naïve patients with malignant glioma."( Phase I study of temozolamide (TMZ) combined with procarbazine (PCB) in patients with gliomas.
Foster, T; Newlands, ES; Zaknoen, S, 2003
)
0.32
" Total response to DTIC used in combination with IPHN-alpha increased insignificantly: 25."( [Chemoimmunotherapy with dacarbazine and aranose combined with interferon-alpha in disseminated cutaneous melanoma].
Akimov, MA; Gershanovich, ML, 2004
)
0.32
"To evaluate the efficacy of temozolomide (TMZ) combined with cisplatin (CDDP) in terms of response rate, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS), as well as the tolerability of the regimen in patients with brain metastases from solid tumors."( Temozolomide (TMZ) combined with cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with brain metastases from solid tumors: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Phase II study.
Aravantinos, G; Bafaloukos, D; Bamias, A; Carina, M; Christodoulou, C; Klouvas, G; Linardou, H; Skarlos, D, 2005
)
0.33
"Patients (n=32) with brain metastases were treated with TMZ 150 mg/m2/day (chemotherapy-pretreated) or 200 mg/m2/day (chemotherapy-naive) for 5 days, combined with CDDP 75 mg/m2 on day 1, every 28 days."( Temozolomide (TMZ) combined with cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with brain metastases from solid tumors: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Phase II study.
Aravantinos, G; Bafaloukos, D; Bamias, A; Carina, M; Christodoulou, C; Klouvas, G; Linardou, H; Skarlos, D, 2005
)
0.33
"TMZ combined with CDDP is an active and well-tolerated combination in patients with brain metastases from solid tumors."( Temozolomide (TMZ) combined with cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with brain metastases from solid tumors: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Phase II study.
Aravantinos, G; Bafaloukos, D; Bamias, A; Carina, M; Christodoulou, C; Klouvas, G; Linardou, H; Skarlos, D, 2005
)
0.33
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carmustine (BCNU) in combination with temozolomide as first-line chemotherapy before and after radiotherapy (RT) in patients with inoperable, newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)."( Temozolomide in combination with BCNU before and after radiotherapy in patients with inoperable newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme.
Barrié, M; Braguer, D; Chinot, O; Couprie, C; Dufour, H; Figarella-Branger, D; Grisoli, F; Hoang-Xuan, K; Martin, PM; Muracciole, X; Peragut, JC, 2005
)
0.33
"This randomized phase II study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of dacarbazine (DTIC) and bleomycin, vincristine, lomustine and DTIC (BOLD) combined with natural interferon-alpha (nIFN-alpha) or recombinant interferon-alpha2b (rIFN-alpha2b) in patients with advanced melanoma."( Randomized trial of dacarbazine versus bleomycin, vincristine, lomustine and dacarbazine (BOLD) chemotherapy combined with natural or recombinant interferon-alpha in patients with advanced melanoma.
Hahka-Kemppinen, M; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P; Korpela, M; Parvinen, LM; Pyrhönen, S; Seppä, H; Vuoristo, MS, 2005
)
0.33
" Furthermore, we show that a human haemopoietic cell line (K562) transduced with a retroviral vector encoding MGMT(P140K) is highly resistant to the cytotoxic effects of PaTrin-2 in combination with the methylating agent temozolomide, and that cells expressing MGMT(P140K) can be effectively enriched in vitro following challenge with this drug combination."( The P140K mutant of human O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) confers resistance in vitro and in vivo to temozolomide in combination with the novel MGMT inactivator O(6)-(4-bromothenyl)guanine.
Fairbairn, LJ; Margison, GP; Milsom, MD; Southgate, TD; Woolford, LB, 2006
)
0.33
" As the combination with interferon-alfa (IFN-alpha) appears superior to single-agent DTIC regarding response rates, the purpose of this study was to compare TMZ alone and TMZ plus IFN-alpha in terms of objective response (OR), overall survival, and safety in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial."( Temozolomide in combination with interferon-alfa versus temozolomide alone in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: a randomized, phase III, multicenter study from the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group.
Becker, JC; Dummer, R; Garbe, C; Kaufmann, R; Krengel, S; Kretschmer, L; Leiter, U; Linse, R; Mauch, C; Schadendorf, D; Sebastian, G; Spieth, K; Tilgen, W; Vogt, T; von den Driesch, P, 2005
)
0.33
"Two hundred ninety-four patients with untreated stage IV metastatic melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) were randomly assigned to receive either oral TMZ alone (200 mg/m2/day; days 1 through 5 every 28 days) or in combination with subcutaneous IFN-alpha (5 MU/m2; days 1, 3, and 5 every week)."( Temozolomide in combination with interferon-alfa versus temozolomide alone in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: a randomized, phase III, multicenter study from the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group.
Becker, JC; Dummer, R; Garbe, C; Kaufmann, R; Krengel, S; Kretschmer, L; Leiter, U; Linse, R; Mauch, C; Schadendorf, D; Sebastian, G; Spieth, K; Tilgen, W; Vogt, T; von den Driesch, P, 2005
)
0.33
" In conclusion, temozolomide combined with cisplatin is an active and safe first-line chemotherapy regimen with acceptable and easily manageable toxicities in patients with metastatic melanoma."( Temozolomide in combination with cisplatin in patients with metastatic melanoma: a phase II trial.
Argon, A; Camlica, H; Tas, F; Topuz, E, 2005
)
0.33
" Patients with stable or progressive malignant primary glioma received erlotinib alone or combined with temozolomide in this dose-escalation study."( Phase 1 study of erlotinib HCl alone and combined with temozolomide in patients with stable or recurrent malignant glioma.
Burton, E; Butowski, N; Chang, S; Fedoroff, A; Kapadia, A; Kelley, SK; Lamborn, KR; Malec, M; Page, MS; Prados, MD; Rabbitt, J; Xie, D, 2006
)
0.33
" The main aims of this phase I trial were to determine an ATase-depleting dose (ADD) of lomeguatrib, a potent pseudosubstrate inhibitor, and to define a suitable dose of temozolomide to be used in combination with lomeguatrib in patients with advanced cancer."( Lomeguatrib, a potent inhibitor of O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase: phase I safety, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic trial and evaluation in combination with temozolomide in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Bridgewater, J; Dawson, M; Donnelly, D; Gumbrell, L; Halbert, G; Jowle, D; Lee, SM; Margison, GP; McElhinney, RS; McGrath, H; McMurry, TB; Middleton, MR; Ranson, M; Waller, S, 2006
)
0.33
"Lomeguatrib was administered at dose levels of 10 to 40 mg/m2 days 1 to 5, as a single agent, and also in combination with temozolomide."( Lomeguatrib, a potent inhibitor of O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase: phase I safety, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic trial and evaluation in combination with temozolomide in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Bridgewater, J; Dawson, M; Donnelly, D; Gumbrell, L; Halbert, G; Jowle, D; Lee, SM; Margison, GP; McElhinney, RS; McGrath, H; McMurry, TB; Middleton, MR; Ranson, M; Waller, S, 2006
)
0.33
" Groups treated with regional temozolomide alone (350 mg/kg), systemic temozolomide with O6BG, or vehicle combined with O6BG showed no significant tumor responses compared with controls."( Modulation of chemotherapy resistance in regional therapy: a novel therapeutic approach to advanced extremity melanoma using intra-arterial temozolomide in combination with systemic O6-benzylguanine.
Abdel-Wahab, OI; Abdel-Wahab, Z; Augustine, C; Cheng, TY; Friedman, HS; Grubbs, E; Ko, SH; Pruitt, SK; Tyler, DS; Ueno, T; Yoshimoto, Y, 2006
)
0.33
" We designed a new regimen utilizing dose-intensified, protracted course of TMZ in combination with vinorelbine, a lipophilic large-spectrum agent, in an attempt to improve the efficacy of TMZ."( Vinorelbine combined with a protracted course of temozolomide for recurrent brain metastases: a phase I trial.
Abrey, LE; Demopoulos, A; Malkin, MG; Omuro, AM; Raizer, JJ, 2006
)
0.33
" A multicentre phase II study was performed to assess the activity and toxicity of temozolomide in combination with interferon alpha-2b."( Phase II multicentre study of temozolomide in combination with interferon alpha-2b in metastatic malignant melanoma.
Crespo, C; del Muro, XG; Filipovich, E; García, M; Germà-Lluch, JR; López, JJ; Pérez, X; Rifà, J; Tres, A; Valladares, M, 2006
)
0.33
" Previously untreated patients received temozolomide administered orally at a dose of 150 mg/m/day for 5 days every 4 weeks, in combination with interferon given continuously subcutaneously twice a week at a dose of 10 MU/m."( Phase II multicentre study of temozolomide in combination with interferon alpha-2b in metastatic malignant melanoma.
Crespo, C; del Muro, XG; Filipovich, E; García, M; Germà-Lluch, JR; López, JJ; Pérez, X; Rifà, J; Tres, A; Valladares, M, 2006
)
0.33
"Temozolomide in combination with interferon is a well-tolerated palliative regimen that has moderate activity against metastatic melanoma."( Phase II multicentre study of temozolomide in combination with interferon alpha-2b in metastatic malignant melanoma.
Crespo, C; del Muro, XG; Filipovich, E; García, M; Germà-Lluch, JR; López, JJ; Pérez, X; Rifà, J; Tres, A; Valladares, M, 2006
)
0.33
" In contrast, the cytotoxic drug temozolomide, when used in combination with HIF-1alpha knockdown, exhibited a superadditive and likely synergistic therapeutic effect compared with the monotherapy of either treatment alone in the D54MG glioma model."( Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 inhibition in combination with temozolomide treatment exhibits robust antitumor efficacy in vivo.
Albert, DH; Fesik, SW; Li, L; Lin, X; Shen, Y; Shoemaker, AR, 2006
)
0.33
"Our results show that the DNA alkylating agent temozolomide exhibits robust antitumor efficacy when used in combination with HIF-1 inhibition in D54MG-derived tumors, suggesting that the combination of temozolomide with HIF-1 inhibitors might be an effective regimen for cancer therapy."( Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 inhibition in combination with temozolomide treatment exhibits robust antitumor efficacy in vivo.
Albert, DH; Fesik, SW; Li, L; Lin, X; Shen, Y; Shoemaker, AR, 2006
)
0.33
" The observed antitumor activity warrants further evaluation of this combination as an alternative to or in combination with whole-brain radiation therapy for the treatment of multiple brain metastases."( Phase I study of capecitabine in combination with temozolomide in the treatment of patients with brain metastases from breast carcinoma.
Arun, B; Broglio, K; Buchholz, T; Francis, D; Groves, M; Hortobagyi, GN; Meyers, C; Rivera, E; Valero, V; Yin, G, 2006
)
0.33
" Three MMR-proficient melanoma cell clones with low or no MGMT activity were treated daily for 5 days with 50 micromol/l TMZ, alone or in combination with 5 micromol/l BG."( A single cycle of treatment with temozolomide, alone or combined with O(6)-benzylguanine, induces strong chemoresistance in melanoma cell clones in vitro: role of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and the mismatch repair system.
Alvino, E; Bonmassar, E; Caporali, S; Caporaso, P; Castiglia, D; D'Atri, S; Fischer, F; Jiricny, J; Lacal, PM; Marra, G; Pepponi, R; Zambruno, G, 2006
)
0.33
" Randomized studies are needed to explore the role of celecoxib in combination with chemotherapy or as maintenance treatment in these patients."( Temozolomide in combination with celecoxib in patients with advanced melanoma. A phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.
Fountzilas, G; Frangia, K; Gogas, H; Mantzourani, M; Markopoulos, C; Middleton, M; Panagiotou, P; Papadopoulos, O; Pectasides, D; Polyzos, A; Stavrinidis, I; Tsoutsos, D; Vaiopoulos, G, 2006
)
0.33
"The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of temozolomide (TZM) in combination with X-rays on proliferation and migration in human glioma spheroids."( The inhibition of proliferation and migration of glioma spheroids exposed to temozolomide is less than additive if combined with irradiation.
Fehlauer, F; Muench, M; Rades, D; Richter, E, 2007
)
0.34
"To compare results of treatment with temozolomide or dacarbazine, in combination with an anthracycline, in dogs with relapsed or refractory lymphoma."( Efficacy of temozolomide or dacarbazine in combination with an anthracycline for rescue chemotherapy in dogs with lymphoma.
Cadile, CD; Dervisis, NG; Dominguez, PA; Kitchell, BE; Newman, RG; Sarbu, L; Swanson, CN, 2007
)
0.34
"The regimen, temozolomide combined with fotemustine, is an active and moderately safe first-line chemotherapy regimen with acceptable and easily manageable toxicities in patients with metastatic melanoma."( Temozolomide in combination with fotemustine in patients with metastatic melanoma.
Camlica, H; Tas, F; Topuz, E, 2008
)
0.35
" The effect of ZD6474, a potent inhibitor of VEGF-receptor-2, was evaluated in combination with either radiotherapy or temozolomide."( Effects of the VEGFR inhibitor ZD6474 in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide in an orthotopic glioma model.
Bergenheim, AT; Bergström, P; Henriksson, R; Johansson, M; Sandström, M, 2008
)
0.35
" ZD6474 30 mg/kg was given alone or in combination with radiotherapy 12 Gy x 1 or with temozolomide 100 mg/kg for 3 days."( Effects of the VEGFR inhibitor ZD6474 in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide in an orthotopic glioma model.
Bergenheim, AT; Bergström, P; Henriksson, R; Johansson, M; Sandström, M, 2008
)
0.35
"ZD6474 in combination with radiotherapy significantly decreased tumour area by 66% compared with controls whereas the combination with temozolomide decreased tumour area by 74%."( Effects of the VEGFR inhibitor ZD6474 in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide in an orthotopic glioma model.
Bergenheim, AT; Bergström, P; Henriksson, R; Johansson, M; Sandström, M, 2008
)
0.35
"ZD6474 in combination with two standard modalities in the treatment of malignant glioma, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, markedly decreased the growth of an intracerebral experimental glioma."( Effects of the VEGFR inhibitor ZD6474 in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide in an orthotopic glioma model.
Bergenheim, AT; Bergström, P; Henriksson, R; Johansson, M; Sandström, M, 2008
)
0.35
"A phase II trial was initiated to analyze the activity of continuously administered pioglitazone and rofecoxib combined with low-dose chemotherapy (capecitabine or temozolomide) in patients with high-grade gliomas (glioblastoma or anaplastic glioma)."( Low-dose chemotherapy in combination with COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR-gamma agonists in recurrent high-grade gliomas - a phase II study.
Baumgart, U; Bogdahn, U; Hau, P; Hirschmann, B; Kunz-Schughart, L; Muhleisen, H; Reichle, A; Ruemmele, P; Steinbrecher, A; Weimann, E, 2007
)
0.34
"To assess interim safety and tolerability of a 10-patient, Phase II pilot study using bevacizumab (BV) in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) and regional radiation therapy (RT) in the up-front treatment of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma."( Phase II pilot study of bevacizumab in combination with temozolomide and regional radiation therapy for up-front treatment of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: interim analysis of safety and tolerability.
Bergsneider, M; Cloughesy, T; Filka, E; Graham, C; Lai, A; Liau, LM; McGibbon, B; Mischel, P; Nghiemphu, PL; Pope, W; Selch, M; Yong, WH, 2008
)
0.35
" At this time data are not sufficient to encourage routine off-label use of BV combined with TMZ/RT in the setting of newly diagnosed glioblastoma without longer follow-up, enrollment of additional patients, and thorough efficacy assessment."( Phase II pilot study of bevacizumab in combination with temozolomide and regional radiation therapy for up-front treatment of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: interim analysis of safety and tolerability.
Bergsneider, M; Cloughesy, T; Filka, E; Graham, C; Lai, A; Liau, LM; McGibbon, B; Mischel, P; Nghiemphu, PL; Pope, W; Selch, M; Yong, WH, 2008
)
0.35
"6% and 1/6 rat survived more than 1 year in case of MRT combined with gadolinium injection."( Enhancement of survival of 9L gliosarcoma bearing rats following intracerebral delivery of drugs in combination with microbeam radiation therapy.
Bräuer-Krisch, E; Bravin, A; Keyriläinen, J; Le Duc, G; Régnard, P; Troprès, I, 2008
)
0.35
" The article reports safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic results of the first-in-class trial of a PARP inhibitor, AG014699, combined with temozolomide in adults with advanced malignancy."( Phase I study of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, AG014699, in combination with temozolomide in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Boddy, A; Calvert, H; Curtin, N; Dewji, R; Evans, J; Harris, A; Johnson, P; Jones, C; McHugh, P; Middleton, M; Newell, D; Olsen, A; Plummer, R; Robson, L; Steinfeldt, H; Wang, D; Wilson, R, 2008
)
0.35
" Dasatinib in combination with temozolomide more effectively increased the therapeutic efficacy of temozolomide than when dasatinib was combined with carboplatin or irinotecan."( Dasatinib-induced autophagy is enhanced in combination with temozolomide in glioma.
de Groot, J; LaFortune, T; Milano, V; Piao, Y, 2009
)
0.35
"To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with temozolomide to improve local tumor control in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS)."( Preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with temozolomide for locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma.
Dinter, DJ; Hohenberger, P; Jakob, J; Ströbel, P; Wenz, F, 2009
)
0.35
" Drug combination of TMZ plus BG and PHA-848125 produced additive or synergistic effects on cell growth, depending on the cell line."( The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor PHA-848125 suppresses the in vitro growth of human melanomas sensitive or resistant to temozolomide, and shows synergistic effects in combination with this triazene compound.
Alvino, E; Bonmassar, E; Brasca, MG; Caporali, S; Castiglia, D; Ciomei, M; Covaciu, C; D'Atri, S; Garbin, A; Levati, L; Starace, G, 2010
)
0.36
" After irradiation of the symptomatic sites, intrathecal liposomal Ara-C every 2-4 weeks was combined with temozolomide 100 mg/m(2) day 1-5/7."( Neoplastic meningitis from breast cancer: feasibility and activity of long-term intrathecal liposomal Ara-C combined with dose-dense temozolomide.
Buhk, JH; Hoffmann, AL; Strik, H, 2009
)
0.35
"To evaluate the effects and the toxicity of the protocol of CDV combined with CiE as pre-operative chemotherapy in childhood stage IV neuroblastoma."( [Curative effects of the protocol of CDV combined with CiE as pre-operative chemotherapy in high-risk childhood neuroblastoma].
Feng, C; Liu, Y; Tang, SQ; Wang, JW; Yang, G, 2009
)
0.35
"The protocol of CDV combined with CiE as pre-operative chemotherapy might be effective in children with stage IV neuroblastoma."( [Curative effects of the protocol of CDV combined with CiE as pre-operative chemotherapy in high-risk childhood neuroblastoma].
Feng, C; Liu, Y; Tang, SQ; Wang, JW; Yang, G, 2009
)
0.35
"To evaluate maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose (RD) for phase II studies of topotecan (TPT) combined with temozolomide (TMZ) (TOTEM) in children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory solid malignancies."( Phase I study of topotecan in combination with temozolomide (TOTEM) in relapsed or refractory paediatric solid tumours.
Aerts, I; Chastagner, P; Chatelut, E; Corradini, N; Dias, N; Djafari, L; Frappaz, D; Gentet, JC; Geoerger, B; Landman-Parker, J; Le Deley, MC; Leblond, P; Ndiaye, A; Paci, A; Pasquet, M; Rubie, H; Schmitt, A; Vassal, G, 2010
)
0.36
" Our results demonstrate the potential of the anti-IGF-1R antibody alone and in combination with alkylating agents and support the therapeutic development of the AVE1642 for aggressive neuroblastoma."( Anti-insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor antibody EM164 (murine AVE1642) exhibits anti-tumour activity alone and in combination with temozolomide against neuroblastoma.
Brasme, JF; Daudigeos-Dubus, E; Debussche, L; Geoerger, B; Opolon, P; Vassal, G; Venot, C; Vrignaud, P, 2010
)
0.36
" Metronomic dosing of temozolomide (TMZ) combined with standard radiotherapy may improve survival by increasing the therapeutic index and anti-angiogenic effect of TMZ."( A multi-centre Canadian pilot study of metronomic temozolomide combined with radiotherapy for newly diagnosed paediatric brainstem glioma.
Bartels, U; Baruchel, S; Bouffet, E; Eisenstat, D; Gammon, J; Huang, A; Hukin, J; Johnston, DL; Samson, Y; Sharp, JR; Stempak, D; Stephens, D; Tabori, U, 2010
)
0.36
" This factorial design phase I/II protocol tested dose-dense temozolomide alone and combined with cytostatic agents."( A phase I factorial design study of dose-dense temozolomide alone and in combination with thalidomide, isotretinoin, and/or celecoxib as postchemoradiation adjuvant therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Chang, E; Colman, H; Conrad, C; de Groot, J; Giglio, P; Gilbert, MR; Gonzalez, J; Groves, MD; Hess, K; Hunter, K; Levin, V; Mahajan, A; Puduvalli, V; Woo, S; Yung, WK, 2010
)
0.36
"Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor of Raf and several growth factor receptors, is under investigation in combination with dacarbazine, a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of many cancers."( Pharmacokinetic results of a phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with dacarbazine in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Armand, JP; Brendel, E; Lathia, C; Ludwig, M; Robert, C; Ropert, S; Soria, JC, 2011
)
0.37
" On the basis of promising preclinical data, the safety and tolerability of therapy with the mTOR inhibitor RAD001 in combination with radiation (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) was evaluated in this Phase I study."( North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase I trial N057K of everolimus (RAD001) and temozolomide in combination with radiation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme.
Brown, PD; Buckner, JC; Galanis, E; Giannini, C; Jaeckle, KA; McGraw, S; Peller, PJ; Sarkaria, JN; Uhm, JH; Wu, W, 2011
)
0.37
"All patients received weekly oral RAD001 in combination with standard chemoradiotherapy, followed by RAD001 in combination with standard adjuvant temozolomide."( North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase I trial N057K of everolimus (RAD001) and temozolomide in combination with radiation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme.
Brown, PD; Buckner, JC; Galanis, E; Giannini, C; Jaeckle, KA; McGraw, S; Peller, PJ; Sarkaria, JN; Uhm, JH; Wu, W, 2011
)
0.37
" On the basis of these results, the recommended Phase II dosage currently being tested is RAD001 70 mg/week in combination with standard chemoradiotherapy."( North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase I trial N057K of everolimus (RAD001) and temozolomide in combination with radiation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme.
Brown, PD; Buckner, JC; Galanis, E; Giannini, C; Jaeckle, KA; McGraw, S; Peller, PJ; Sarkaria, JN; Uhm, JH; Wu, W, 2011
)
0.37
"RAD001 in combination with RT/TMZ and adjuvant TMZ was reasonably well tolerated."( North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase I trial N057K of everolimus (RAD001) and temozolomide in combination with radiation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme.
Brown, PD; Buckner, JC; Galanis, E; Giannini, C; Jaeckle, KA; McGraw, S; Peller, PJ; Sarkaria, JN; Uhm, JH; Wu, W, 2011
)
0.37
" Fifty-nine patients underwent primary surgery by wide or marginal excision and were subsequently randomized to receive radiotherapy alone or in combination with six courses of chemotherapy consisting of ifosfamide, DTIC, and doxorubicin administered in 14-day intervals supported by G-CSF on days 5-13."( Intensified adjuvant IFADIC chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for soft tissue sarcoma: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized feasibility trial.
Abdolvahab, F; Brodowicz, T; Dominkus, M; Ebm, C; Fakhrai, N; Jantsch, M; Kauer-Dorner, D; Kostler, WJ; Pokrajac, B; Zielinski, CC, 2010
)
0.36
"The phase II trial has been prepared to assess the effectiveness of BPA (250 mg/kg)-based NCT combined with X-ray irradiation and temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)) for the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM."( The status of Tsukuba BNCT trial: BPA-based boron neutron capture therapy combined with X-ray irradiation.
Aiyama, H; Endo, K; Ishikawa, E; Kumada, H; Matsumura, A; Mizumoto, M; Nakai, K; Nariai, T; Okumura, T; Shibata, Y; Takada, T; Tsuboi, K; Yamamoto, T; Yoshida, F; Zaboronok, A, 2011
)
0.37
" The major differences of our protocol from the other past studies were simultaneous use of both sodium borocapate and boronophenylalanine, and combination with fractionated X-ray irradiation."( Phase II clinical study of boron neutron capture therapy combined with X-ray radiotherapy/temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme--study design and current status report.
Hiramatsu, R; Hirota, Y; Kawabata, S; Kirihata, M; Kuroiwa, T; Maruhashi, A; Miyata, S; Miyatake, S; Ono, K; Sakurai, Y; Takekita, Y, 2011
)
0.37
" Here, we describe 3 cases of GBM patients treated with autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine (AFTV) combined with TMZ."( Pathological changes after autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine therapy combined with temozolomide for glioblastoma - three case reports - .
Enomoto, T; Ishikawa, E; Matsumura, A; Morishita, Y; Nakai, K; Ohno, T; Sakamoto, N; Sato, M; Satomi, K; Takano, S; Tsuboi, K; Yamamoto, T, 2011
)
0.37
"The primary end point was surpassed showing promising activity of this bevacizumab/temozolomide combination with a favourable toxicity profile."( First-line temozolomide combined with bevacizumab in metastatic melanoma: a multicentre phase II trial (SAKK 50/07).
Cathomas, R; Dummer, R; Gillessen, S; Goldinger, SM; Mamot, C; Michielin, O; Mjhic-Probst, D; Moch, H; Ochsenbein, A; Schläppi, M; Schönewolf, N; Schraml, PH; Seifert, B; Simcock, M; von Moos, R, 2012
)
0.38
" The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of nimotuzumab in combination with chemotherapy for patients with malignant gliomas."( [Nimotuzumab in combination with chemotherapy for patients with malignant gliomas].
Chen, ZP; Jiang, XB; Mu, YG; Sai, K; Shen, D; Yang, QY; Zhang, XH, 2011
)
0.37
" Individualized chemotherapy was administered based on O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression and previous chemotherapy responses in combined with nimotuzumab."( [Nimotuzumab in combination with chemotherapy for patients with malignant gliomas].
Chen, ZP; Jiang, XB; Mu, YG; Sai, K; Shen, D; Yang, QY; Zhang, XH, 2011
)
0.37
"Nimotuzumab in combination with chemotherapy has moderate activity in patients with malignant gliomas and the toxicities are well tolerable, therefore, worth further investigation."( [Nimotuzumab in combination with chemotherapy for patients with malignant gliomas].
Chen, ZP; Jiang, XB; Mu, YG; Sai, K; Shen, D; Yang, QY; Zhang, XH, 2011
)
0.37
" In vitro Southern Blot analysis and cytopathic effect assays demonstrate high anti-glioma potency, which was significantly increased in combination with temozolomide (TMZ), daunorubicin and cisplatin."( YB-1 dependent virotherapy in combination with temozolomide as a multimodal therapy approach to eradicate malignant glioma.
Anton, M; Gänsbacher, B; Haczek, C; Holm, PS; Holzmüller, R; Kasajima, A; Lage, H; Mantwill, K; Rognoni, E; Schlegel, J; Schuster, T; Treue, D; Weichert, W, 2011
)
0.37
" Herein, we report the first phase I experience of the novel O6-meG pseudosubstrate lomeguatrib, combined with dacarbazine."( Inhibition of DNA repair with MGMT pseudosubstrates: phase I study of lomeguatrib in combination with dacarbazine in patients with advanced melanoma and other solid tumours.
Kirkwood, JM; Moschos, S; Radkowski, R; Shipe-Spotloe, J; Sulecki, M; Tarhini, A; Tawbi, HA; Villaruz, L; Viverette, F, 2011
)
0.37
"This is a phase I dose-escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of lomeguatrib combined with a single dose of dacarbazine on a 21-day schedule."( Inhibition of DNA repair with MGMT pseudosubstrates: phase I study of lomeguatrib in combination with dacarbazine in patients with advanced melanoma and other solid tumours.
Kirkwood, JM; Moschos, S; Radkowski, R; Shipe-Spotloe, J; Sulecki, M; Tarhini, A; Tawbi, HA; Villaruz, L; Viverette, F, 2011
)
0.37
" In this study, safety and clinical activity of L19-IL2 in combination with dacarbazine were assessed in patients with metastatic melanoma."( A dose-escalation and signal-generating study of the immunocytokine L19-IL2 in combination with dacarbazine for the therapy of patients with metastatic melanoma.
de Braud, F; Eigentler, TK; Garbe, C; Giovannoni, L; González-Iglesias, R; Kaspar, M; Lovato, V; Menssen, HD; Neri, D; Pflugfelder, A; Romanini, A; Schwager, K; Spitaleri, G; Tasciotti, A; Trachsel, E; Weide, B, 2011
)
0.37
"The first 10 studied patients received escalating doses of L19-IL2 on days 1, 3, and 5 in combination with 1 g/m(2) of dacarbazine on day 1 of a 3-weekly therapy cycle."( A dose-escalation and signal-generating study of the immunocytokine L19-IL2 in combination with dacarbazine for the therapy of patients with metastatic melanoma.
de Braud, F; Eigentler, TK; Garbe, C; Giovannoni, L; González-Iglesias, R; Kaspar, M; Lovato, V; Menssen, HD; Neri, D; Pflugfelder, A; Romanini, A; Schwager, K; Spitaleri, G; Tasciotti, A; Trachsel, E; Weide, B, 2011
)
0.37
"The recommended dose of L19-IL2 in combination with dacarbazine was defined as 22."( A dose-escalation and signal-generating study of the immunocytokine L19-IL2 in combination with dacarbazine for the therapy of patients with metastatic melanoma.
de Braud, F; Eigentler, TK; Garbe, C; Giovannoni, L; González-Iglesias, R; Kaspar, M; Lovato, V; Menssen, HD; Neri, D; Pflugfelder, A; Romanini, A; Schwager, K; Spitaleri, G; Tasciotti, A; Trachsel, E; Weide, B, 2011
)
0.37
"The repeated administration of L19-IL2 in combination with dacarbazine is safe and shows encouraging signs of clinical activity in patients with metastatic melanoma."( A dose-escalation and signal-generating study of the immunocytokine L19-IL2 in combination with dacarbazine for the therapy of patients with metastatic melanoma.
de Braud, F; Eigentler, TK; Garbe, C; Giovannoni, L; González-Iglesias, R; Kaspar, M; Lovato, V; Menssen, HD; Neri, D; Pflugfelder, A; Romanini, A; Schwager, K; Spitaleri, G; Tasciotti, A; Trachsel, E; Weide, B, 2011
)
0.37
"To study the efficacy and safety of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with temozolomide (TMZ) for gliomas."( [Efficacy and safety of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with temozolomide for glioma].
Tu, Q; Wang, L; Zhou, R; Zhou, W, 2011
)
0.37
" The patients received temozolomide alone,3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy alone,3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with temozolomide in the chemotherapy group,the radiotherapy group and the comprehensive therapy group respectively."( [Efficacy and safety of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with temozolomide for glioma].
Tu, Q; Wang, L; Zhou, R; Zhou, W, 2011
)
0.37
"Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with temozolomide is more effective for gliomas than the simple 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and the temozolomide chemotherapy alone."( [Efficacy and safety of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with temozolomide for glioma].
Tu, Q; Wang, L; Zhou, R; Zhou, W, 2011
)
0.37
" Levels of SHP-1 substrates (pSTAT1, pSTAT3, pLck and pSlp76) were increased (up to 3x) in peripheral blood cells following SSG with no potentiation by combination with IFN-α2b."( Phosphatase inhibitor, sodium stibogluconate, in combination with interferon (IFN) alpha 2b: phase I trials to identify pharmacodynamic and clinical effects.
Borden, EC; Budd, TG; Elson, P; Hollovary, E; Jacobs, B; Mitsuhashi, M; Spiro, T; Triozzi, P; Yi, T, 2011
)
0.37
"To study the safety and efficacy of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in combination with temozolomide in treatment of patients with diffuse brainstem glioma."( [Safety and efficacy of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with temozolomide in treatment of diffuse brainstem gliomas].
Cai, CL; Fang, HH; Kang, JB; Li, FM; Nie, Q, 2011
)
0.37
" It is likely that clinical testing of these agents will be in combination with standard therapies to harness the apoptotic potential of both the agents."( The MEK1/2 inhibitor, selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886), enhances anti-tumour efficacy when combined with conventional chemotherapeutic agents in human tumour xenograft models.
Alferez, D; Davies, BR; Heaton, SP; Heier, A; Holt, SV; Logié, A; Odedra, R; Smith, PD; Wilkinson, RW, 2012
)
0.38
"The aim of this study was to identify agents, which would be likely to offer clinical benefit when combined with selumetinib."( The MEK1/2 inhibitor, selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886), enhances anti-tumour efficacy when combined with conventional chemotherapeutic agents in human tumour xenograft models.
Alferez, D; Davies, BR; Heaton, SP; Heier, A; Holt, SV; Logié, A; Odedra, R; Smith, PD; Wilkinson, RW, 2012
)
0.38
" In several models we observed that continuous exposure to selumetinib in combination with docetaxel results in tumour regression."( The MEK1/2 inhibitor, selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886), enhances anti-tumour efficacy when combined with conventional chemotherapeutic agents in human tumour xenograft models.
Alferez, D; Davies, BR; Heaton, SP; Heier, A; Holt, SV; Logié, A; Odedra, R; Smith, PD; Wilkinson, RW, 2012
)
0.38
"The data presented suggests that MEK inhibition in combination with several standard chemotherapeutics or an Aurora B kinase inhibitor is a promising clinical strategy."( The MEK1/2 inhibitor, selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886), enhances anti-tumour efficacy when combined with conventional chemotherapeutic agents in human tumour xenograft models.
Alferez, D; Davies, BR; Heaton, SP; Heier, A; Holt, SV; Logié, A; Odedra, R; Smith, PD; Wilkinson, RW, 2012
)
0.38
" As HSP27 and AKT interact to regulate the activity of each other, we determined whether inhibition of HSP27 was better than targeting SPARC as a therapeutic approach to inhibit both SPARC-induced glioma cell invasion and survival."( Inhibition of HSP27 alone or in combination with pAKT inhibition as therapeutic approaches to target SPARC-induced glioma cell survival.
Brodie, C; Brown, SL; Golembieski, WA; King, DA; Rempel, SA; Schultz, CR, 2012
)
0.38
"We conclude that inhibition of HSP27 alone, or in combination with pAKT inhibitor IV, may be an effective therapeutic approach to inhibit SPARC-induced glioma cell invasion and survival in SPARC-positive/PTEN-wildtype and SPARC-positive/PTEN-null tumors, respectively."( Inhibition of HSP27 alone or in combination with pAKT inhibition as therapeutic approaches to target SPARC-induced glioma cell survival.
Brodie, C; Brown, SL; Golembieski, WA; King, DA; Rempel, SA; Schultz, CR, 2012
)
0.38
"A retrospective study assessing treatment-related toxicities in tumor-bearing cats treated with temozolomide (TMZ) alone or in combination with doxorubicin was conducted."( Treatment-related toxicities in tumor-bearing cats treated with temozolomide alone or in combination with doxorubicin: a pilot assessment.
Dervisis, NG; Gagnon, J; Kitchell, BE, 2012
)
0.38
" The primary objectives of this randomized phase 2 trial were to determine the safety and efficacy of cilengitide when combined with radiation and temozolomide for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme and to select a dose for comparative clinical testing."( A safety run-in and randomized phase 2 study of cilengitide combined with chemoradiation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (NABTT 0306).
Batchelor, T; Brem, S; Fisher, JD; Grossman, SA; Hegi, ME; Lesser, G; Mikkelsen, T; Nabors, LB; Olsen, J; Peereboom, D; Rosenfeld, MR; Ye, X, 2012
)
0.38
"Cilengitide was well tolerated when combined with standard chemoradiation and may improve survival for patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme regardless of MGMT methylation status."( A safety run-in and randomized phase 2 study of cilengitide combined with chemoradiation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (NABTT 0306).
Batchelor, T; Brem, S; Fisher, JD; Grossman, SA; Hegi, ME; Lesser, G; Mikkelsen, T; Nabors, LB; Olsen, J; Peereboom, D; Rosenfeld, MR; Ye, X, 2012
)
0.38
" At the time of last relapse, temozolomide was administered alone and combined with external beam radiation therapy."( Temozolomide combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of recurrent cranial meningioma previously treated with multiple surgical resections and two sessions of radiosurgery: a case report and literature review.
Alongi, F; Clerici, E; Navarria, P; Rognone, E; Santoro, A; Scorsetti, M; Simonelli, M,
)
0.13
"To evaluate the toxicity and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of arsenic trioxide (ATO) in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation therapy (RT) in malignant gliomas."( Phase I study of arsenic trioxide and temozolomide in combination with radiation therapy in patients with malignant gliomas.
Chandler, JP; Grimm, SA; Jovanovic, B; Levy, RM; Marymont, M; McCarthy, K; Muro, K; Newman, SB; Raizer, JJ, 2012
)
0.38
"A phase I, dose-finding study of vorinostat in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and pharmacokinetics in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG)."( Phase I study of vorinostat in combination with temozolomide in patients with high-grade gliomas: North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study 04-03.
Ames, MM; Chang, SM; Cloughesy, TF; Desideri, S; Drappatz, J; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Gilbert, MR; Kuhn, JG; Lamborn, KR; Lassman, AB; Lee, EQ; Lieberman, FS; McGovern, RM; Prados, MD; Puduvalli, VK; Reid, JM; Robins, HI; Wen, PY; Xu, J; Ye, X; Yung, WK, 2012
)
0.38
" Part 1 was a dose-escalation study of vorinostat in combination with TMZ 150 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days every 28 days."( Phase I study of vorinostat in combination with temozolomide in patients with high-grade gliomas: North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study 04-03.
Ames, MM; Chang, SM; Cloughesy, TF; Desideri, S; Drappatz, J; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Gilbert, MR; Kuhn, JG; Lamborn, KR; Lassman, AB; Lee, EQ; Lieberman, FS; McGovern, RM; Prados, MD; Puduvalli, VK; Reid, JM; Robins, HI; Wen, PY; Xu, J; Ye, X; Yung, WK, 2012
)
0.38
"In part 1, the MTD of vorinostat administered on days 1 to 7 and 15 to 21 of every 28-day cycle, in combination with TMZ, was 500 mg daily."( Phase I study of vorinostat in combination with temozolomide in patients with high-grade gliomas: North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study 04-03.
Ames, MM; Chang, SM; Cloughesy, TF; Desideri, S; Drappatz, J; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Gilbert, MR; Kuhn, JG; Lamborn, KR; Lassman, AB; Lee, EQ; Lieberman, FS; McGovern, RM; Prados, MD; Puduvalli, VK; Reid, JM; Robins, HI; Wen, PY; Xu, J; Ye, X; Yung, WK, 2012
)
0.38
"Vorinostat in combination with temozolomide is well tolerated in patients with HGG."( Phase I study of vorinostat in combination with temozolomide in patients with high-grade gliomas: North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study 04-03.
Ames, MM; Chang, SM; Cloughesy, TF; Desideri, S; Drappatz, J; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Gilbert, MR; Kuhn, JG; Lamborn, KR; Lassman, AB; Lee, EQ; Lieberman, FS; McGovern, RM; Prados, MD; Puduvalli, VK; Reid, JM; Robins, HI; Wen, PY; Xu, J; Ye, X; Yung, WK, 2012
)
0.38
" One of the most interesting combinations that have started to become part of the therapeutic arsenal in the daily clinic is dose-dense temozolomide in combination with bevacizumab."( A review of dose-dense temozolomide alone and in combination with bevacizumab in patients with first relapse of glioblastoma.
Bergqvist, M; Bergström, S; Blomquist, E; Ekman, S; Henriksson, R; Johansson, F, 2012
)
0.38
" (177)Lu-octreotate, in combination with capecitabine and temozolomide, is well tolerated in patients with advanced low-grade NETs, and shows substantial tumor control rates."( Phase I-II study of radiopeptide 177Lu-octreotate in combination with capecitabine and temozolomide in advanced low-grade neuroendocrine tumors.
Claringbold, PG; Price, RA; Turner, JH, 2012
)
0.38
" This drug combination significantly impaired the sphere-forming ability of GSCs in vitro and tumor formation in vivo, leading to increase in the overall survival of mice bearing orthotopic inoculation of GSCs."( Effective elimination of cancer stem cells by a novel drug combination strategy.
Chen, G; Colman, H; Feng, L; Huang, P; Keating, MJ; Li, X; Wang, F; Wang, J; Wang, L; Xu, RH; Yuan, S; Zhang, H, 2013
)
0.39
" We hypothesized that epigenetic modulators will reverse chemotherapy resistance, and in this article, we report studies that sought to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, and efficacy of decitabine (DAC) combined with TMZ."( Safety and efficacy of decitabine in combination with temozolomide in metastatic melanoma: a phase I/II study and pharmacokinetic analysis.
Beumer, JH; Buch, SC; Christner, S; Egorin, MJ; Kirkwood, JM; Lin, Y; Moschos, S; Tarhini, AA; Tawbi, HA, 2013
)
0.39
"This study suggests that ABT-888 has the clinical potential to enhance the current standard treatment for GBM, in combination with conventional chemo-radiotherapy."( Evaluation of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor ABT-888 combined with radiotherapy and temozolomide in glioblastoma.
Barazzuol, L; Burnet, NG; Jena, R; Jeynes, JC; Kirkby, KJ; Kirkby, NF; Meira, LB, 2013
)
0.39
"Daily oral everolimus (10 mg) combined with both concurrent radiation and temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide is well tolerated, with an acceptable toxicity profile."( RTOG 0913: a phase 1 study of daily everolimus (RAD001) in combination with radiation therapy and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Chinnaiyan, P; Corn, BW; Dipetrillo, TA; Mehta, MP; Rojiani, AM; Wen, PY; Wendland, M; Won, M, 2013
)
0.39
"To evaluate the efficacy of pulsed low-dose radiation therapy (PLRT) combined with temozolomide (TMZ) as a novel treatment approach for radioresistant glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in a murine model."( Pulsed versus conventional radiation therapy in combination with temozolomide in a murine orthotopic model of glioblastoma multiforme.
Chunta, JL; Grills, IS; Huang, J; Krueger, SA; Lee, DY; Marples, B; Martinez, AA; Park, SS; Wilson, GD, 2013
)
0.39
"Patients treated within a Phase I/II Trial with a carbon ion boost were compared retrospectively with randomly chosen patients treated with photons or photons in combination with TMZ in a retrospective analysis."( Comparison of carbon ion radiotherapy to photon radiation alone or in combination with temozolomide in patients with high-grade gliomas: explorative hypothesis-generating retrospective analysis.
Bruckner, T; Combs, SE; Debus, J; Kamada, T; Kieser, M; Mizoe, JE; Tsujii, H, 2013
)
0.39
"To assess objective response rate (ORR) after two cycles of temozolomide in combination with topotecan (TOTEM) in children with refractory or relapsed neuroblastoma."( Phase II study of temozolomide in combination with topotecan (TOTEM) in relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: a European Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer-SIOP-European Neuroblastoma study.
Aerts, I; Amoroso, L; Boubaker, A; Casanova, M; Chastagner, P; Courbon, F; Devos, A; Di Giannatale, A; Dias-Gastellier, N; Ducassoul, S; Geoerger, B; Landman-Parker, J; Le Deley, MC; Malekzadeh, K; Mc Hugh, K; Munzer, C; Riccardi, R; Rubie, H; Verschuur, A; Zwaan, CM, 2014
)
0.4
" In the present analysis, we retrospectively investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of bevacizumab combined with ICE in patients with glioblastoma at second relapse during ICE treatment."( Retrospective analysis of bevacizumab in combination with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide in patients with second recurrence of glioblastoma.
Arakawa, Y; Fujimoto, K; Kikuchi, T; Kunieda, T; Miyamoto, S; Mizowaki, T; Murata, D; Takagi, Y; Takahashi, JC, 2013
)
0.39
" We aimed to assess the safety and early clinical efficacy of this drug as first-line treatment in combination with standard or modified-standard treatment in patients with previously untreated Hodgkin's lymphoma."( Brentuximab vedotin combined with ABVD or AVD for patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma: a phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study.
Ansell, SM; Connors, JM; Fanale, M; Huebner, D; Hunder, NN; O'Meara, MM; Park, SI; Younes, A, 2013
)
0.39
"We did a phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation safety study comparing brentuximab vedotin in combination with standard (ABVD) or a modified-standard (AVD) treatment."( Brentuximab vedotin combined with ABVD or AVD for patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma: a phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study.
Ansell, SM; Connors, JM; Fanale, M; Huebner, D; Hunder, NN; O'Meara, MM; Park, SI; Younes, A, 2013
)
0.39
" The maximum tolerated dose of brentuximab vedotin when combined with ABVD or AVD was not exceeded at 1·2 mg/kg."( Brentuximab vedotin combined with ABVD or AVD for patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma: a phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study.
Ansell, SM; Connors, JM; Fanale, M; Huebner, D; Hunder, NN; O'Meara, MM; Park, SI; Younes, A, 2013
)
0.39
"Brentuximab vedotin should not be given with bleomycin in general or specifically as first-line therapy for patients with treatment naive, advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma."( Brentuximab vedotin combined with ABVD or AVD for patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma: a phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study.
Ansell, SM; Connors, JM; Fanale, M; Huebner, D; Hunder, NN; O'Meara, MM; Park, SI; Younes, A, 2013
)
0.39
"To determine the maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan administered every 2 weeks, in combination with a fixed and continuous administration of temozolomide, in patients with glioblastoma at first relapse."( A phase I study of irinotecan in combination with metronomic temozolomide in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
Balañá, C; Gallego, O; García, JL; Iglesias, L; Pérez, P; Reynés, G, 2014
)
0.4
" More generally, these results suggest that traditional therapy in combination with local, as opposed to systemic, delivery of angiogenesis inhibitors may be able to increase median survival for patients with glioblastoma."( Local delivery of angiogenesis-inhibitor minocycline combined with radiotherapy and oral temozolomide chemotherapy in 9L glioma.
Bow, H; Brem, H; Hwang, LS; Murray, L; Salditch, Q; Schildhaus, N; Tyler, B; Weingart, J; Xing, J; Ye, X; Zhang, Y, 2014
)
0.4
"To evaluate the safety and efficacy of nimotuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody specific for the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) in Chinese patients."( Nimotuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody specific for the EGFR, in combination with temozolomide and radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: First results in Chinese patients.
Chen, S; Dai, JZ; Pan, L; Sheng, XF; Wang, Y, 2016
)
0.43
" During RT, concurrent TMZ was given daily at 75 mg/m(2) for 40-42 days, combined with six weekly infusions of nimotuzumab at a 200 mg dose."( Nimotuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody specific for the EGFR, in combination with temozolomide and radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: First results in Chinese patients.
Chen, S; Dai, JZ; Pan, L; Sheng, XF; Wang, Y, 2016
)
0.43
" This phase I open-label, noncontrolled dose escalation study was performed to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Sb in combination with radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) in 17 patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma."( Phase I study of sorafenib combined with radiation therapy and temozolomide as first-line treatment of high-grade glioma.
Ben Aissa, A; Bodmer, A; Dietrich, PY; Dunkel, N; Espeli, V; Hottinger, AF; Hundsberger, T; Mach, N; Schaller, K; Squiban, D; Vargas, MI; Weber, DC, 2014
)
0.4
"Patients were treated with RT (60 Gy in 2 Gy fractions) combined with TMZ 75 mg m(-2) daily, and Sb administered at three dose levels (200 mg daily, 200 mg BID, and 400 mg BID) starting on day 8 of RT."( Phase I study of sorafenib combined with radiation therapy and temozolomide as first-line treatment of high-grade glioma.
Ben Aissa, A; Bodmer, A; Dietrich, PY; Dunkel, N; Espeli, V; Hottinger, AF; Hundsberger, T; Mach, N; Schaller, K; Squiban, D; Vargas, MI; Weber, DC, 2014
)
0.4
"Although Sb can be combined with RT and TMZ, significant side effects and moderate outcome results do not support further clinical development in malignant gliomas."( Phase I study of sorafenib combined with radiation therapy and temozolomide as first-line treatment of high-grade glioma.
Ben Aissa, A; Bodmer, A; Dietrich, PY; Dunkel, N; Espeli, V; Hottinger, AF; Hundsberger, T; Mach, N; Schaller, K; Squiban, D; Vargas, MI; Weber, DC, 2014
)
0.4
"Twenty-six patients received CEP-9722 150-1,000 mg/day combined with temozolomide."( Phase 1 dose-escalation study of the PARP inhibitor CEP-9722 as monotherapy or in combination with temozolomide in patients with solid tumors.
Aissat-Daudigny, L; Brown, PD; Cambois, A; Campone, M; Moachon, G; Plummer, R; Stephens, P, 2014
)
0.4
" F8-IL2 was shown to selectively localize at the tumor site in vivo, following intravenous administration, and to mediate tumor growth retardation, which was potentiated by the combination with paclitaxel or dacarbazine."( Preclinical evaluation of IL2-based immunocytokines supports their use in combination with dacarbazine, paclitaxel and TNF-based immunotherapy.
Castioni, N; Elia, G; Neri, D; Pretto, F, 2014
)
0.4
"WBRT followed by IMBRT combined with concomitant TMZ is well tolerated, yielding an encouraging objective response rate; however, overall survival improves slightly comparing with RTOG 9508 randomized trial."( Whole brain radiation therapy followed by intensity-modulated boosting treatment combined with concomitant temozolomide for brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer.
Jiang, Z; Leng, C; Liang, S; Liu, H; Lu, F; Lu, S; Qi, X; Shi, J; Wang, Q; Wang, S, 2014
)
0.4
"To investigate the electronic anti-nausea instrument (EANI) combined with hydrochloride palonosetron for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy."( Phase II study on EANI combined with hydrochloride palonosetron for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
Guo, JX; Huang, XE; Liu, J; Liu, YC; Wei, W; Xiao, Y, 2014
)
0.4
"Patients who received highly emetogenic chemotherapy were randomly assigned to a treatment group (60 patients) treated with EANI combined with hydrochloride palonosetron, and control group (also 60 patients) given only hydrochloride palonosetron."( Phase II study on EANI combined with hydrochloride palonosetron for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
Guo, JX; Huang, XE; Liu, J; Liu, YC; Wei, W; Xiao, Y, 2014
)
0.4
"EANI combined with hydrochloride palonosetron for prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy could be more effective than hydrochloride palonosetron alone, and can be recommended for use in prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy."( Phase II study on EANI combined with hydrochloride palonosetron for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
Guo, JX; Huang, XE; Liu, J; Liu, YC; Wei, W; Xiao, Y, 2014
)
0.4
"2 mg/kg three times weekly for 2 weeks (starting on day 1), in combination with oral panobinostat 10, 20, or 30 mg every 96 h (starting on day 8), and oral temozolomide 150 mg/m(2)/day on days 9 through 13."( Treatment of resistant metastatic melanoma using sequential epigenetic therapy (decitabine and panobinostat) combined with chemotherapy (temozolomide).
Deutsch, J; Frees, M; Laux, D; Leon-Ferre, R; Milhem, M; Smith, BJ; Xia, C, 2014
)
0.4
"This triple agent of dual epigenetic therapy in combination with traditional chemotherapy was generally well tolerated by the cohort and appeared safe to be continued in a Phase II trial."( Treatment of resistant metastatic melanoma using sequential epigenetic therapy (decitabine and panobinostat) combined with chemotherapy (temozolomide).
Deutsch, J; Frees, M; Laux, D; Leon-Ferre, R; Milhem, M; Smith, BJ; Xia, C, 2014
)
0.4
" Data from phase 2 trials suggest that it has antitumour activity as a single agent in recurrent glioblastoma and in combination with standard temozolomide chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (particularly in tumours with methylated MGMT promoter)."( Cilengitide combined with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CENTRIC EORTC 26071-22072 study): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
Adamska, K; Aldape, KD; Brandes, AA; Erridge, SC; Gorlia, T; Grujicic, D; Gupta, T; Hau, P; Hegi, ME; Herrlinger, U; Hicking, C; Hong, YK; Kim, CY; Kortmann, RD; Lhermitte, B; Markivskyy, A; McBain, C; Nabors, LB; Nam, DH; Perry, J; Picard, M; Pietsch, T; Rao, N; Reardon, DA; Schnell, O; Shen, CC; Steinbach, JP; Stupp, R; Taphoorn, MJ; Tarnawski, R; Thurzo, L; Tonn, JC; van den Bent, MJ; Weller, M; Weyerbrock, A; Wick, W; Wiegel, T, 2014
)
0.4
" In the present work, TMZ was combined with a specific SKI, and the cytotoxic effect of each drug alone or in combination was tested on GBM cell lines."( A sphingosine kinase inhibitor combined with temozolomide induces glioblastoma cell death through accumulation of dihydrosphingosine and dihydroceramide, endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy.
Choi, J; Kopp-Schneider, A; Noack, J; Régnier-Vigouroux, A; Richter, K, 2014
)
0.4
" We reasoned this could be more effective if combined with a vaccine that preferentially targeted TMZ-resistant cells."( Dendritic cell vaccination combined with temozolomide retreatment: results of a phase I trial in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.
Ancelet, LR; Bauer, E; Dzhelali, M; Findlay, MP; Gasser, O; Hamilton, DA; Hermans, IF; Hunn, MK; Mester, B; Sharples, KJ; Wood, CE, 2015
)
0.42
"After a biopsy (6 patients) or a resection (13 patients) of a newly diagnosed GBM, 19 patients received radiotherapy (30 fractions of 2 Gy) in combination with daily TMZ 75 mg/m(2) and BV 10 mg/kg on days 1, 14, and 28, followed by 6 monthly cycles of TMZ 150-200 mg/m(2) on days 1-5."( Bevacizumab in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme.
Reijneveld, JC; Richel, DJ; Stalpers, LJ; van Furth, WR; van Linde, ME; Verheul, HM; Verhoeff, JJ, 2015
)
0.42
"Wee1 regulates key DNA damage checkpoints, and in this study, the efficacy of the Wee1 inhibitor MK-1775 was evaluated in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) xenograft models alone and in combination with radiation and/or temozolomide."( The Efficacy of the Wee1 Inhibitor MK-1775 Combined with Temozolomide Is Limited by Heterogeneous Distribution across the Blood-Brain Barrier in Glioblastoma.
Agar, NY; Bakken, KK; Calligaris, D; Carlson, BL; Decker, PA; Eckel-Passow, JE; Elmquist, WF; Evans, DL; Gupta, SK; Iyekegbe, DO; Lou, Z; Ma, B; Mueller, D; Pokorny, JL; Pucci, V; Sarkaria, JN; Schroeder, MA; Shumway, SD, 2015
)
0.42
"In vitro MK-1775 efficacy alone and in combination with temozolomide, and the impact on DNA damage, was analyzed by Western blotting and γH2AX foci formation."( The Efficacy of the Wee1 Inhibitor MK-1775 Combined with Temozolomide Is Limited by Heterogeneous Distribution across the Blood-Brain Barrier in Glioblastoma.
Agar, NY; Bakken, KK; Calligaris, D; Carlson, BL; Decker, PA; Eckel-Passow, JE; Elmquist, WF; Evans, DL; Gupta, SK; Iyekegbe, DO; Lou, Z; Ma, B; Mueller, D; Pokorny, JL; Pucci, V; Sarkaria, JN; Schroeder, MA; Shumway, SD, 2015
)
0.42
" However, there was no sensitizing effect of MK-1775 when combined with temozolomide in vitro."( The Efficacy of the Wee1 Inhibitor MK-1775 Combined with Temozolomide Is Limited by Heterogeneous Distribution across the Blood-Brain Barrier in Glioblastoma.
Agar, NY; Bakken, KK; Calligaris, D; Carlson, BL; Decker, PA; Eckel-Passow, JE; Elmquist, WF; Evans, DL; Gupta, SK; Iyekegbe, DO; Lou, Z; Ma, B; Mueller, D; Pokorny, JL; Pucci, V; Sarkaria, JN; Schroeder, MA; Shumway, SD, 2015
)
0.42
" Primary GBM cells were treated with VPA as a monotherapy and in combination with temozolomide and irradiation."( The effect of valproic acid in combination with irradiation and temozolomide on primary human glioblastoma cells.
Cosgrove, L; Day, B; Fay, M; Head, R; Hosein, AN; Lim, YC; Martin, JH; Rose, S; Sminia, P; Stringer, B, 2015
)
0.42
" This phase II, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial investigated the efficacy and safety of 2 dose regimens of the selective integrin inhibitor cilengitide combined with standard chemoradiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and an unmethylated MGMT promoter."( Two cilengitide regimens in combination with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and unmethylated MGMT gene promoter: results of the open-label, controlled, randomized phase II CORE study.
Ashby, L; Depenni, R; Fink, KL; Grujicic, D; Hegi, ME; Hicking, C; Lhermitte, B; Mazurkiewicz, M; Mikkelsen, T; Nabors, LB; Nam, DH; Perry, JR; Picard, M; Reardon, DA; Salacz, M; Tarnawski, R; Zagonel, V, 2015
)
0.42
" Cilengitide was administered intravenously in combination with daily temozolomide (TMZ) and concomitant radiotherapy (RT; wk 1-6), followed by TMZ maintenance therapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ)."( Two cilengitide regimens in combination with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and unmethylated MGMT gene promoter: results of the open-label, controlled, randomized phase II CORE study.
Ashby, L; Depenni, R; Fink, KL; Grujicic, D; Hegi, ME; Hicking, C; Lhermitte, B; Mazurkiewicz, M; Mikkelsen, T; Nabors, LB; Nam, DH; Perry, JR; Picard, M; Reardon, DA; Salacz, M; Tarnawski, R; Zagonel, V, 2015
)
0.42
"Standard and intensive cilengitide dose regimens were well tolerated in combination with TMZ/RT→TMZ."( Two cilengitide regimens in combination with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and unmethylated MGMT gene promoter: results of the open-label, controlled, randomized phase II CORE study.
Ashby, L; Depenni, R; Fink, KL; Grujicic, D; Hegi, ME; Hicking, C; Lhermitte, B; Mazurkiewicz, M; Mikkelsen, T; Nabors, LB; Nam, DH; Perry, JR; Picard, M; Reardon, DA; Salacz, M; Tarnawski, R; Zagonel, V, 2015
)
0.42
" Pre-clinically, selumetinib in combination with alkylating agents enhanced antitumour activity compared with chemotherapy alone."( Study design and rationale for a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to assess the efficacy of selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) in combination with dacarbazine in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (SUMIT).
Carvajal, RD; Mann, H; Nathan, PD; Schwartz, GK; Smith, I, 2015
)
0.42
"SUMIT is a randomised, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study assessing the efficacy and safety of selumetinib in combination with dacarbazine in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma who have not received prior systemic therapy."( Study design and rationale for a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to assess the efficacy of selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) in combination with dacarbazine in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (SUMIT).
Carvajal, RD; Mann, H; Nathan, PD; Schwartz, GK; Smith, I, 2015
)
0.42
" This study evaluating selumetinib in combination with dacarbazine was designed with input from the US FDA, and is the first potential registration trial to be conducted in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma."( Study design and rationale for a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to assess the efficacy of selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) in combination with dacarbazine in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (SUMIT).
Carvajal, RD; Mann, H; Nathan, PD; Schwartz, GK; Smith, I, 2015
)
0.42
" Abemaciclib antitumor activity was assessed in subcutaneous and orthotopic glioma models alone and in combination with standard of care temozolomide (TMZ)."( Brain Exposure of Two Selective Dual CDK4 and CDK6 Inhibitors and the Antitumor Activity of CDK4 and CDK6 Inhibition in Combination with Temozolomide in an Intracranial Glioblastoma Xenograft.
Ajamie, RT; De Dios, A; Gelbert, LM; Kulanthaivel, P; Raub, TJ; Sanchez-Martinez, C; Sawada, GA; Shannon, HE; Staton, BA; Wishart, GN, 2015
)
0.42
" In this study, we found that PI3K inhibitor combined with miR-125b inhibitor caused a marked increase of TMZ-induced GSC proliferation and invasiveness inhibition."( PI3K inhibitor combined with miR-125b inhibitor sensitize TMZ-induced anti-glioma stem cancer effects through inactivation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.
Fei, X; Shi, L; Wang, Z; You, Y, 2015
)
0.42
"The primary aim of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of TPI 287 and the safety and tolerability of TPI 287 alone and in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in pediatric patients with refractory or recurrent neuroblastoma or medulloblastoma."( A Phase 1 Trial of TPI 287 as a Single Agent and in Combination With Temozolomide in Patients with Refractory or Recurrent Neuroblastoma or Medulloblastoma.
Ashikaga, T; Bergendahl, G; DeSarno, M; Eslin, D; Ferguson, W; Hanna, GK; Higgins, T; Kaplan, J; Kraveka, J; Mitchell, D; Roberts, W; Sholler, GL; Werff, AV, 2016
)
0.43
"Eighteen patients were enrolled to a phase I dose escalation trial of weekly intravenous infusion of TPI 287 for two 28-day cycles with toxicity monitoring to determine the MTD, followed by two cycles of TPI 287 in combination with TMZ."( A Phase 1 Trial of TPI 287 as a Single Agent and in Combination With Temozolomide in Patients with Refractory or Recurrent Neuroblastoma or Medulloblastoma.
Ashikaga, T; Bergendahl, G; DeSarno, M; Eslin, D; Ferguson, W; Hanna, GK; Higgins, T; Kaplan, J; Kraveka, J; Mitchell, D; Roberts, W; Sholler, GL; Werff, AV, 2016
)
0.43
"We determined the MTD of TPI 287 alone and in combination with temozolomide to be 125 mg/m(2)."( A Phase 1 Trial of TPI 287 as a Single Agent and in Combination With Temozolomide in Patients with Refractory or Recurrent Neuroblastoma or Medulloblastoma.
Ashikaga, T; Bergendahl, G; DeSarno, M; Eslin, D; Ferguson, W; Hanna, GK; Higgins, T; Kaplan, J; Kraveka, J; Mitchell, D; Roberts, W; Sholler, GL; Werff, AV, 2016
)
0.43
" Pharmacokinetic testing did not show evidence of drug-drug interaction between irinotecan and alisertib."( Phase I Study of the Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor Alisertib in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: A NANT (New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy) Trial.
Bagatell, R; Courtier, J; Czarnecki, S; DuBois, SG; Fox, E; Goodarzian, F; Groshen, S; Hawkins, R; Kudgus, RA; Lai, H; Malvar, J; Marachelian, A; Maris, JM; Matthay, KK; Mosse, YP; Reid, JM; Shimada, H; Tsao-Wei, D; Wagner, L, 2016
)
0.43
" This phase I study aims to evaluate its safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacodynamic effect, and preliminary efficacy when combined with adjuvant temozolomide in GBM patients after standard chemoradiotherapy."( A phase I study to repurpose disulfiram in combination with temozolomide to treat newly diagnosed glioblastoma after chemoradiotherapy.
Campian, JL; DeWees, TA; Gujar, AD; Huang, J; Kim, AH; Lockhart, AC; Tran, DD; Tsien, CI, 2016
)
0.43
"The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of interferon (IFN) combined with dacarbazine (DTIC) (experimental group) versus DTIC alone (control group) in cutaneous malignant melanoma."( Meta-Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Interferon Combined With Dacarbazine Versus Dacarbazine Alone in Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma.
Hou, XY; Huang, Q; Jiang, G; Tang, JQ; Xin, Y; Yang, M; Zhang, LZ; Zhang, P, 2016
)
0.43
" We show that GSI in combination with RT and TMZ attenuates proliferation, decreases 3D spheroid growth and results into a marked reduction in clonogenic survival in primary and established glioma cell lines."( NOTCH blockade combined with radiation therapy and temozolomide prolongs survival of orthotopic glioblastoma.
Barbeau, LM; Chalmers, AJ; Eekers, DB; Granton, PV; Groot, AJ; Habets, R; Iglesias, VS; King, H; Prickaerts, J; Short, SC; Theys, J; van Hoof, SJ; Verhaegen, F; Vooijs, M; Yahyanejad, S, 2016
)
0.43
" We investigated the pharmacologic characteristics of OTX015 as a single agent and combined with targeted therapy or conventional chemotherapies in glioblastoma cell lines."( OTX015 (MK-8628), a novel BET inhibitor, displays in vitro and in vivo antitumor effects alone and in combination with conventional therapies in glioblastoma models.
Astorgues-Xerri, L; Bekradda, M; Berenguer-Daizé, C; Cayol, M; Cvitkovic, E; Lokiec, F; MacKenzie, S; Noel, K; Odore, E; Ouafik, L; Rezai, K; Riveiro, ME, 2016
)
0.43
" Subsequently, each agent was used in combination with CNDAC at fixed concentration ratios."( Mechanism-Based Drug Combinations with the DNA Strand-Breaking Nucleoside Analog CNDAC.
Hargis, S; Jiang, Y; Liu, X; Nowak, B; Plunkett, W, 2016
)
0.43
" Its combination with other chemotherapeutic agents was reported to produce synergistic/additive effects on various cancers."( In-vitro and in-vivo inhibition of melanoma growth and metastasis by the drug combination of celecoxib and dacarbazine.
Averineni, RK; Guan, X; Sadhu, SS; Seefeldt, T; Wang, S; Yang, Y, 2016
)
0.43
"We observed no survival benefit in young adults (age < 50) with anaplastic glioma when treated with TMZ combined with RT."( Radiation combined with temozolomide contraindicated for young adults diagnosed with anaplastic glioma.
Cai, J; Jiang, T; Li, S; Li, W; Peng, X; Qiu, X; Wang, Y; Wu, C; Yang, P; Yao, K; You, G; Zhang, C; Zhang, W, 2016
)
0.43
"To observe the effect of RITA, a small molecule that targets p53, combined with temozolomide (TMZ) on proliferation, colony formation and apoptosis of human glioblastoma U87 cells and explore the underlying mechanism."( [RITA combined with temozolomide inhibits the proliferation of human glioblastoma U87 cells].
Cao, ZX; Feng, XL; He, XY; Song, XP; Wu, QH; Xiao, WW; Zeng, HC; Zhang, B, 2016
)
0.43
" RITA combined with TMZ caused a more significant inhibition of U87 cells (29."( [RITA combined with temozolomide inhibits the proliferation of human glioblastoma U87 cells].
Cao, ZX; Feng, XL; He, XY; Song, XP; Wu, QH; Xiao, WW; Zeng, HC; Zhang, B, 2016
)
0.43
" The present study used a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) nude-mouse model of melanoma with a BRAF-V600E mutation to determine the efficacy of temozolomide (TEM) combined with tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R."( Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R combined with temozolomide regresses malignant melanoma with a BRAF-V600E mutation in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model.
Chmielowski, B; Dry, SM; Eilber, FC; Hoffman, RM; Igarashi, K; Kawaguchi, K; Kiyuna, T; Li, Y; Murakami, T; Nelson, SD; Russell, TA; Singh, A; Unno, M; Zhang, Y; Zhao, M, 2016
)
0.43
" We evaluated the safety and tolerance of additional use of D,L-methadone in patients with glioma in combination with chemotherapy."( Safety and Tolerance of D,L-Methadone in Combination with Chemotherapy in Patients with Glioma.
Friesen, C; Misch, M; Onken, J; Vajkoczy, P, 2017
)
0.46
"D,L-methadone can be safely combined with standard glioma chemotherapy without increasing the risk of toxicity or vegetative symptoms such as tachycardia, sweating and restlessness."( Safety and Tolerance of D,L-Methadone in Combination with Chemotherapy in Patients with Glioma.
Friesen, C; Misch, M; Onken, J; Vajkoczy, P, 2017
)
0.46
"Antagonists of inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs), alone or in combination with genotoxic therapeutics, have been shown to efficiently induce cell death in various solid tumors."( Examining the In Vitro Efficacy of the IAP Antagonist Birinapant as a Single Agent or in Combination With Dacarbazine to Induce Melanoma Cell Death.
Alexopoulos, LG; Charles, EM; Hellwig, CT; Rehm, M; Rožanc, J; Vetma, V, 2017
)
0.46
" To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of severe hypokalemia and proximal tubular renal dysfunction as a result of a possible drug-drug interaction between vinblastine, tenofovir and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir."( Severe hypokalemia due to a possible drug-drug interaction between vinblastine and antiretrovirals in a HIV-infected patient with Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Arcondo, F; Cordova, E; Morganti, L; Odzak, A; Rodriguez, C; Silva, M; Zylberman, M, 2017
)
0.46
"New therapeutic agents in combination with the standard Stupp protocol (a protocol about the temozolomide combined with radiotherapy treatment with glioblastoma was research by Stupp R in 2005) were assessed to evaluate whether they were superior to the Stupp protocol alone, to determine the optimum treatment regimen for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma."( The interventional effect of new drugs combined with the Stupp protocol on glioblastoma: A network meta-analysis.
Chen, T; Fu, A; Li, J; Li, M; Song, X; Zhu, J, 2017
)
0.46
"The use of novel therapeutic agents in combination with the Stupp protocol were all shown to be superior than the Stupp protocol alone for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma, ranked as follows: cilengitide 2000mg/5/week, bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan, nimotuzumab, bevacizumab, cilengitide 2000mg/2/week, cytokine-induced killer cell immunotherapy, and the Stupp protocol."( The interventional effect of new drugs combined with the Stupp protocol on glioblastoma: A network meta-analysis.
Chen, T; Fu, A; Li, J; Li, M; Song, X; Zhu, J, 2017
)
0.46
"All intervention drugs evaluated in our study were superior to the Stupp protocol alone when used in combination with it."( The interventional effect of new drugs combined with the Stupp protocol on glioblastoma: A network meta-analysis.
Chen, T; Fu, A; Li, J; Li, M; Song, X; Zhu, J, 2017
)
0.46
"We evaluated stereotactic volume modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) for canine gliomas, alone (radiotherapy [RT]) and in combination with temozolomide (RT + TMZ), compared with palliation."( Frameless stereotactic radiotherapy alone and combined with temozolomide for presumed canine gliomas.
Bianchi, C; Carrara, N; Dolera, M; Finesso, S; Malfassi, L; Marcarini, S; Mazza, G; Pavesi, S; Sala, M; Urso, G, 2018
)
0.48
" The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of TMZ in dogs with relapsed multicentric lymphoma that failed multi-agent chemotherapy protocols, and compare the outcome to a group of dogs receiving the same drug in combination with DOX."( Temozolomide alone or in combination with doxorubicin as a rescue agent in 37 cases of canine multicentric lymphoma.
Baines, SJ; Blackwood, L; Elliott, JW; Treggiari, E, 2018
)
0.48
"An intestine-liver-glioblastoma biomimetic system was developed to evaluate the drug combination therapy for glioblastoma."( Evaluation of drug combination for glioblastoma based on an intestine-liver metabolic model on microchip.
He, Z; Jie, M; Li, HF; Lin, JM; Liu, H; Mao, S, 2017
)
0.46
" In vivo, systemic treatment with pacritinib demonstrated blood-brain barrier penetration and led to improved overall median survival in combination with TMZ, in mice orthotopically xenografted with an aggressive recurrent GBM BTIC culture."( The JAK2/STAT3 inhibitor pacritinib effectively inhibits patient-derived GBM brain tumor initiating cells in vitro and when used in combination with temozolomide increases survival in an orthotopic xenograft model.
Aman, A; Cseh, O; Jensen, KV; Luchman, HA; Weiss, S, 2017
)
0.46
"This preclinical study demonstrates the efficacy of pacritinib and supports the feasibility of testing pacritinib for the treatment of GBM, in combination with the standard of care TMZ."( The JAK2/STAT3 inhibitor pacritinib effectively inhibits patient-derived GBM brain tumor initiating cells in vitro and when used in combination with temozolomide increases survival in an orthotopic xenograft model.
Aman, A; Cseh, O; Jensen, KV; Luchman, HA; Weiss, S, 2017
)
0.46
"We performed C57BL/6 mouse orthotopic glioma model by stereotactic intracranial implantation of glioma cell line GL261, mice were randomly divided into four groups: (1) control group; (2) TMZ group; (3) anti-PD-1 antibody group; (4) TMZ combined with anti-PD-1 antibody group."( Temozolomide combined with PD-1 Antibody therapy for mouse orthotopic glioma model.
Dai, B; Li, J; Qi, N; Zhang, G, 2018
)
0.48
"Anti-PD1 antibody combined with TMZ therapy for orthotopic mouse glioma model could significantly improve the survival time of tumor-bear mice."( Temozolomide combined with PD-1 Antibody therapy for mouse orthotopic glioma model.
Dai, B; Li, J; Qi, N; Zhang, G, 2018
)
0.48
"To investigate the clinical efficacy of stereotactic radiation therapy combined with temozolomide on recurrent glioma."( [Clinical efficacy of stereotactic radiation therapy combined with temozolomide on recurrent brain glioma].
Jiang, C; Li, X; Liu, S; Tang, S; Zhao, H, 2018
)
0.48
"We retrospectively analyzed the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy (45 Gy/15 fr) combined with temozolomide (TMZ) followed by bevacizumab (BEV) salvage treatment in 18 glioblastoma patients aged > 75 years."( Treatment outcomes of hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with temozolomide followed by bevacizumab salvage therapy in glioblastoma patients aged > 75 years.
Kayama, T; Matsuda, KI; Nemoto, K; Sakurada, K; Sonoda, Y, 2018
)
0.48
"Hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with TMZ and BEV salvage treatment was found to be safe and effective in glioblastoma patients aged > 75 years."( Treatment outcomes of hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with temozolomide followed by bevacizumab salvage therapy in glioblastoma patients aged > 75 years.
Kayama, T; Matsuda, KI; Nemoto, K; Sakurada, K; Sonoda, Y, 2018
)
0.48
" In addition, TMZ could increase the levels of miR-505 and combination with pri-miR-505 and TMZ promoted the suppressive role mediated by miR-505 in GBM cells."( Combination with TMZ and miR-505 inhibits the development of glioblastoma by regulating the WNT7B/Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.
Fu, C; Liu, X; Yang, X; Zhang, C, 2018
)
0.48
" Temozolomide (TMZ) is one of them, widely used even in combination with ionizing radiation."( Drug resistance in glioblastoma and cytotoxicity of seaweed compounds, alone and in combination with anticancer drugs: A mini review.
Almeida, T; Azqueta, A; Ferreira, J; Ramos, AA; Rocha, E, 2018
)
0.48
" However, their effects and mechanisms of action, alone or in combination with anticancer drugs, namely TMZ, in glioblastoma cell, still few explored and require more attention due to the unquestionable high potential of these marine compounds."( Drug resistance in glioblastoma and cytotoxicity of seaweed compounds, alone and in combination with anticancer drugs: A mini review.
Almeida, T; Azqueta, A; Ferreira, J; Ramos, AA; Rocha, E, 2018
)
0.48
" Six patients received temozolomide and 8 received dacarbazine + 5-FU, combined with Endostar."( Effect of Endostar combined with chemotherapy in advanced well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Bai, CM; Cheng, YJ; Gao, X; Meng, CT; Yan, XY; Ying, HY; Zhou, JF; Zhou, N, 2018
)
0.48
" Administration of isRNA in combination with dacarbazine did not cause any additional damage to liver parenchyma, while stimulating regenerative processes in hepatic tissue of tumor-bearing animals."( [Tumor-Suppressing, Immunostimulating, and Hepatotoxic Effects of Immunostimulatory RNA in Combination with Dacarbazine in a Murine Melanoma Model].
Chernolovskaya, EL; Kabilova, TO; Savin, IA; Sen'kova, AV; Zenkova, MA,
)
0.13
" This work presents a biocompatible and tumor acidic environmental responsive CCM-camouflaged mesoporous silica nanoparticle (CMSN) that is loaded with dacarbazine (DTIC) and combined with aPD1 to achieve better antitumor efficacy."( Cancer Cell Membrane Camouflaged Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Combined with Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Regulating Tumor Microenvironment and Enhancing Antitumor Therapy.
Li, L; Qian, Z; Qiu, L; Zhang, H; Zhao, P; Zhou, S, 2021
)
0.62
"This two-stage phase I trial determined the MTD of zotiraciclib combined with either dose-dense (Arm1) or metronomic (Arm2) temozolomide using a Bayesian Optimal Interval design; then a randomized cohort expansion compared the progression-free survival rate at 4 months (PFS4) of the two arms for an efficient determination of a temozolomide schedule to combine with zotiraciclib at MTD."( Phase I Study of Zotiraciclib in Combination with Temozolomide for Patients with Recurrent High-grade Astrocytomas.
Aboud, O; Ahmad, S; Antony, R; Armstrong, TS; Boris, L; Bryla, C; Burton, EM; Butler, MK; Calvo, KR; Cordova, C; Figg, WD; Fink, D; Gallin, JI; Garren, N; Gilbert, MR; Gonzales, J; Grajkowska, E; Kuhns, DB; Leeper, H; Lindsley, M; Lollo, N; Long Priel, DA; Mendoza, TR; Mentges, K; Pang, Y; Peer, CJ; Penas-Prado, M; Siegel, C; Sissung, TM; Su, YT; Theeler, BJ; Vera, E; Wu, J; Yu, G; Yuan, Y, 2021
)
0.62
"Zotiraciclib combined with temozolomide is safe in patients with recurrent high-grade astrocytomas."( Phase I Study of Zotiraciclib in Combination with Temozolomide for Patients with Recurrent High-grade Astrocytomas.
Aboud, O; Ahmad, S; Antony, R; Armstrong, TS; Boris, L; Bryla, C; Burton, EM; Butler, MK; Calvo, KR; Cordova, C; Figg, WD; Fink, D; Gallin, JI; Garren, N; Gilbert, MR; Gonzales, J; Grajkowska, E; Kuhns, DB; Leeper, H; Lindsley, M; Lollo, N; Long Priel, DA; Mendoza, TR; Mentges, K; Pang, Y; Peer, CJ; Penas-Prado, M; Siegel, C; Sissung, TM; Su, YT; Theeler, BJ; Vera, E; Wu, J; Yu, G; Yuan, Y, 2021
)
0.62
" Cardiac safety for trabectedin monotherapy (T) for STS or in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (T+PLD) for ROC was evaluated in this retrospective postmarketing regulatory commitment."( Cardiac safety of trabectedin monotherapy or in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with sarcomas and ovarian cancer.
Coleman, RL; Demetri, GD; Herzog, TJ; Hu, P; Jones, RL; Knoblauch, R; McGowan, T; Monk, BJ; Patel, SR; Schuetze, SM; Shalaby, W; Triantos, S; Van Tine, BA; von Mehren, M, 2021
)
0.62
" In this work, we evaluate LVR01, an attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium, as neoadjuvant intralesional therapy in combination with dacarbazine in a preclinical melanoma model."( Preclinical Evaluation of LVR01 Attenuated Salmonella as Neoadjuvant Intralesional Therapy in Combination with Chemotherapy for Melanoma Treatment.
Agorio, CI; Chabalgoity, JA; Chilibroste, S; Mónaco, A; Moreno, M; Plata, MC; Vola, M, 2022
)
0.72

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The bioavailability of the drug over 24 hours was 107 micrograms/h."( Ocular pharmacokinetics of dacarbazine following subconjunctival versus intravenous administration in the rabbit.
Kalsi, GS; Rootman, J; Silver, HK, 1991
)
0.28
" This study evaluated the effect of an increase in gastric pH, through the use of ranitidine, on the oral bioavailability and plasma pharmacokinetics of temozolomide and MTIC."( Effect of gastric pH on the relative oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of temozolomide.
Beale, P; Brada, M; Cutler, DL; Judson, I; Marco, A; Moore, S; Reidenberg, P; Statkevich, P, 1999
)
0.3
"Temozolomide, an oral cytotoxic agent with approximately 100% bioavailability after one administration, has demonstrated schedule-dependent clinical activity against highly resistant cancers."( Phase I dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study of temozolomide (SCH 52365) for refractory or relapsing malignancies.
Batra, V; Beale, P; Brada, M; Cutler, D; Dugan, M; Judson, I; Moore, S; Reidenberg, P; Statkevich, P, 1999
)
0.3
"Temozolomide (TMZ) is a new, orally administered, second-generation imidazotetrazine prodrug with essentially 100% oral bioavailability that has demonstrated meaningful efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme."( Future directions in the treatment of malignant gliomas with temozolomide.
Prados, MD, 2000
)
0.31
" Predictable bioavailability and minimal toxicity make temozolomide a candidate for a wide range of clinical testing to evaluate the potential of combination treatments in different tumor types."( Temozolomide and treatment of malignant glioma.
Calvert, H; Friedman, HS; Kerby, T, 2000
)
0.31
" TMZ is an alkylating agent chemically similar to dacarbazine (DTIC) with good oral bioavailability and CNS penetration."( Temozolomide and whole brain irradiation in melanoma metastatic to the brain: a phase II trial of the Cytokine Working Group.
Atkins, B; Clark, I; Dutcher, P; Ernstoff, S; Flaherty, L; Gollob, J; II Smith, W; Johnson, D; Longmate, J; Margolin, K; Sosman, J; Thompson, A; Weber, J; Weiss, G, 2002
)
0.31
" We treated 25 stage IV patients with temozolomide - a cytostatic drug with 100% oral bioavailability and considerable penetration of CNS tissue."( [Temozolomide as therapeutic option for patients with metastatic melanoma and poor prognosis].
Christophers, E; Frick, S; Haacke, TC; Hauschild, A; Lischner, S; Rosien, F; Schäfer, F, 2002
)
0.31
" Temozolomide, an orally bioavailable alkylating agent that crosses the blood-brain barrier, has activity against brain metastases from both small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) when used as a single agent, but response rates are low."( Use of temozolomide with other cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with recurrent brain metastases from lung cancer.
Ebert, BL; Niemierko, E; Salgia, R; Shaffer, K, 2003
)
0.32
" In this work we investigated the effect of association of temozolomide (TMZ), an orally bioavailable alkylating agent, with three chemotherapeutic drugs, liposomal doxorubicin (DOXO), cis-platinum (CDDP)."( Effect of association of temozolomide with other chemotherapic agents on cell growth inhibition in glioma cell lines.
Balzarotti, M; Boiardi, A; Calatozzolo, C; Ciusani, E; Croci, D; Salmaggi, A, 2004
)
0.32
" Pharmacokinetics studies revealed that GPI 15427 possesses a substantial oral bioavailability (plasma Cmax after a single dose of 40 mg/kg: 1041+/-516 ng/ml)."( Brain distribution and efficacy as chemosensitizer of an oral formulation of PARP-1 inhibitor GPI 15427 in experimental models of CNS tumors.
Alemu, C; Calvin, D; Graziani, G; Hoover, R; Lapidus, R; Leonetti, C; Morgan, L; Scarsella, M; Tang, Z; Tentori, L; Vergati, M; Woznizk, K; Xu, W; Zhang, J, 2005
)
0.33
" TMZ is able to cross the blood brain barrier and is stable at gastric acid pH so it has almost 100% oral bioavailability and is rapidly absorbed after it is taken orally."( Role of temozolomide in pediatric brain tumors.
Barone, G; Maurizi, P; Riccardi, R; Tamburrini, G, 2006
)
0.33
" 10b is aqueous soluble, orally bioavailable across multiple species, and demonstrated good in vivo efficacy in a B16F10 subcutaneous murine melanoma model in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) and in an MX-1 breast xenograph model in combination with cisplatin."( Discovery and SAR of 2-(1-propylpiperidin-4-yl)-1H-benzimidazole-4-carboxamide: A potent inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) for the treatment of cancer.
Bontcheva-Diaz, V; Bouska, JJ; Donawho, CK; Frost, DJ; Fry, EH; Gandhi, VB; Giranda, VL; Gong, J; Grandel, R; Johnson, EF; Klinghofer, V; Liu, X; Lubisch, W; Luo, Y; Marsh, KC; Olson, AM; Park, CH; Penning, TD; Rosenberg, SH; Shi, Y; Thomas, S; Wernet, W; Zhu, GD, 2008
)
0.35
"ABT-888 is a potent, orally bioavailable PARP-1/2 inhibitor shown to potentiate DNA damaging agents."( The PARP inhibitor, ABT-888 potentiates temozolomide: correlation with drug levels and reduction in PARP activity in vivo.
Bontcheva-Diaz, VD; Bouska, JJ; Bukofzer, G; Colon-Lopez, M; Donawho, CK; Frost, DJ; Giranda, VL; Guan, R; Jarvis, K; Johnson, EF; Klinghofer, V; Liu, X; Luo, Y; Olson, A; Palma, JP; Penning, TD; Rodriguez, LE; Rosenberg, SH; Saltarelli, MJ; Shi, Y; Stavropoulos, JA; Zhu, GD,
)
0.13
" Although the bioavailability of temozolomide is approximately 100%, pathology or anatomical changes of the gastrointestinal tract may adversely affect absorption, and consequently therapeutic response."( Disposition of temozolomide in a patient with glioblastoma multiforme after gastric bypass surgery.
Beumer, JH; Egorin, MJ; Park, DM; Shah, DD, 2009
)
0.35
" In addition, 3a is aqueous soluble, orally bioavailable across multiple species, and demonstrated good in vivo efficacy in a B16F10 subcutaneous murine melanoma model in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) and in an MX-1 breast cancer xenograft model in combination with either carboplatin or cyclophosphamide."( Discovery of the Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor 2-[(R)-2-methylpyrrolidin-2-yl]-1H-benzimidazole-4-carboxamide (ABT-888) for the treatment of cancer.
Bontcheva-Diaz, V; Bouska, JJ; Donawho, CK; Frost, DJ; Gandhi, VB; Giranda, VL; Gong, J; Johnson, EF; Klinghofer, V; Liu, X; Luo, Y; Marsh, KC; Olson, AM; Osterling, DJ; Penning, TD; Shi, Y; Zhu, GD, 2009
)
0.35
" Thus, our results show that polymeric nanocapsules are able to increase the intratumoral bioavailability of indomethacin and reduce the growth of implanted gliomas."( Indomethacin-loaded nanocapsules treatment reduces in vivo glioblastoma growth in a rat glioma model.
Battastini, AM; Bernardi, A; Braganhol, E; Edelweiss, MI; Figueiró, F; Guterres, SS; Jäger, E; Pohlmann, AR, 2009
)
0.35
" Temozolomide's characteristics which make it a candidate for a wide range of clinical testing to evaluate the potential of combination treatments in different tumor types are its predictable bioavailability and minimal toxicity."( Temozolomide with radiation therapy in high grade brain gliomas: pharmaceuticals considerations and efficacy; a review article.
Beli, I; Chaldeopoulos, D; Fotineas, A; Koukourakis, GV; Kouloulias, V; Kouvaris, J; Maravelis, G; Pantelakos, P; Papadimitriou, C; Zacharias, G, 2009
)
0.35
" In addition, 22b is orally bioavailable across multiple species, crosses the blood-brain barrier, and appears to distribute into tumor tissue."( Optimization of phenyl-substituted benzimidazole carboxamide poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: identification of (S)-2-(2-fluoro-4-(pyrrolidin-2-yl)phenyl)-1H-benzimidazole-4-carboxamide (A-966492), a highly potent and efficacious inhibitor.
Bontcheva-Diaz, V; Bouska, JJ; Buchanan, FG; Bukofzer, GT; Donawho, CK; Frost, DJ; Fry, EH; Gandhi, VB; Giranda, VL; Gong, J; Johnson, EF; Klinghofer, V; Liu, X; Luo, Y; Marsh, KC; Olson, AM; Osterling, DJ; Park, CH; Penning, TD; Rodriguez, LE; Shi, Y; Thomas, S; Zhu, GD, 2010
)
0.36
" Recently, the clinical use of temozolomide (TMZ) has become the more commonly used analog of DTIC-related oral agents because of its greater bioavailability and ability to cross the blood brain barrier."( Quercetin abrogates chemoresistance in melanoma cells by modulating deltaNp73.
Burd, R; Limesand, KH; Mendoza, EE; Mitchell, GC; Radhakrishnan, VM; Sittadjody, S; Thangasamy, T, 2010
)
0.36
" Further in vivo experiments on laboratory animals and analysis of absorption rate and side effects are required."( Arsenic trioxide sensitizes cancer stem cells to chemoradiotherapy. A new approach in the treatment of inoperable glioblastoma multiforme.
Cernea, D; Cocis, A; Fischer-Fodor, E; Florian, IS; Ioani, H; Irimie, A; Kacso, G; Petrescu, M; Soritau, O; Timis, T; Tomuleasa, C; Virag, P,
)
0.13
" We evaluated the preclinical potential of a novel, orally bioavailable PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor (XL765) in in vitro and in vivo studies."( Inhibition of PI3K/mTOR pathways in glioblastoma and implications for combination therapy with temozolomide.
Aftab, DT; Berger, MS; Haas-Kogan, DA; James, CD; Mueller, S; Ozawa, T; Polley, MY; Prados, MD; Prasad, G; Sottero, T; Weiss, WA; Yang, X, 2011
)
0.37
" Future studies are needed to determine whether VPA increases TMZ bioavailability or acts as an inhibitor of histone deacetylases and thereby sensitizes for radiochemotherapy in vivo."( Prolonged survival with valproic acid use in the EORTC/NCIC temozolomide trial for glioblastoma.
Belanger, K; Bogdahn, U; Brandes, AA; Cairncross, JG; Forsyth, P; Gorlia, T; Lacombe, D; Macdonald, DR; Mason, W; Mirimanoff, RO; Rossetti, AO; Stupp, R; van den Bent, MJ; Vecht, CJ; Weller, M, 2011
)
0.37
" This preclinical study sought to test the efficacy of the food additive Triacetin (glyceryl triacetate, GTA) as a novel therapy to increase acetate bioavailability in glioma cells."( Triacetin-based acetate supplementation as a chemotherapeutic adjuvant therapy in glioma.
Davies, MT; Driscoll, HE; Jaworski, DM; Lawler, SE; Long, PM; Penar, PL; Pendlebury, WW; Spees, JL; Teasdale, BA; Tsen, AR; Viapiano, MS, 2014
)
0.4
"CNDAC (2'-C-cyano-2'-deoxy-1-β-d-arabino-pentofuranosyl-cytosine, DFP10917) and its orally bioavailable prodrug, sapacitabine, are undergoing clinical trials for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors."( Mechanism-Based Drug Combinations with the DNA Strand-Breaking Nucleoside Analog CNDAC.
Hargis, S; Jiang, Y; Liu, X; Nowak, B; Plunkett, W, 2016
)
0.43
" Its high bioavailability (40%~100%) and high tissue distribution in both monkeys and rats were its most important pharmacokinetic features."( Novel PARP1/2 inhibitor mefuparib hydrochloride elicits potent in vitro and in vivo anticancer activity, characteristic of high tissue distribution.
Chen, CH; Chen, XY; Chen, Y; Ding, J; Gao, ZW; He, JX; He, Q; Huan, XJ; Li, XH; Liao, XM; Lu, XL; Miao, ZH; Shen, YY; Song, SS; Su, Y; Sun, YM; Tan, C; Tong, LJ; Wang, M; Wang, YQ; Wang, YT; Xiong, B; Yang, CH; Yang, XY, 2017
)
0.46
" However, its pharmacological activity is reduced due MTIC low bioavailability in the brain."( Biophysical interaction of temozolomide and its active metabolite with biomembrane models: The relevance of drug-membrane interaction for Glioblastoma Multiforme therapy.
Andrade, S; Coelho, MÁN; Loureiro, JA; Pereira, MC; Ramalho, MJ, 2019
)
0.51
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
"The study aimed to enhance the solubility, dissolution, and oral bioavailability of standardized Piper longum fruits ethanolic extract (PLFEE) via fourth-generation ternary solid dispersion (SD) for melanoma therapy."( Quality by design-based development and optimization of fourth-generation ternary solid dispersion of standardized Piper longum extract for melanoma therapy.
Agrawal, AK; Dubey, PK; Kumar, DN; Mohapatra, D; Pandey, V; Sahu, AN; Shreya, S, 2023
)
0.91
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51

Dosage Studied

Dacarbazine (DTIC) is a chemotherapy drug which has antitumor activity at standard doses. It exhibits a steep dose-response effect in vitro, and is associated with relatively few side effects. We report a patient with malignant melanoma metastatic to the liver in whom an apparent dose- response relationship to dacarbazines was demonstrated.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" This drug combination does not appear to offer any therapeutic advantage within the dosage range tested in disseminated malignant melanoma."( Phase 1-11 study of DTIC and cyclocytidine in disseminated malignant melanoma.
Baker, LH; Izbicki, RM; Ratanatharathorn, V; Samson, MK, 1976
)
0.26
" 5-Azacytidine was administered subcutaneously at a dosage of 100 mg/m2/day for 10 days."( Phase II study of subcutaneously administered 5-azacytidine (NSC-102816) in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma.
Bellet, RE; Berd, D; Catalano, RB; Mastrangelo, MJ, 1978
)
0.26
" DTIC monotherapy was administered to 14 patients; one patient received additionally vitamin A in high dosage and a further patient VP 16 (a podophyllotoxin preparation)."( [Dacarbacinum (DTIC) and bronchogenic carcinoma (author's transl)].
Titscher, R, 1978
)
0.26
" This combination appears to be safe, provided the field of radiation is not so large that is may add significantly to the myelosuppressive effect of chemotherapy and the dosage of concomitantly administered radiopotentiating agent(s) is reduced."( Feasibility of integration of modalities in melanomas and sarcomas.
Berger, JL; Friedman, M; Holyoke, ED; Karakousis, CP; Lopez, R; Takita, H, 1979
)
0.26
" It is concluded that after current dosage of the drug, bleeding disorders caused by impairment of platelet functions are improbable."( Influence of imidazole carboxamide on platelet functions and coagulation in vitro.
Klener, P; Kubisz, P,
)
0.13
" At the normal therapeutic dosages, methotrexate is eliminated by the kidneys as the unchanged drug; appropriate dosage modifications are mandatory if renal function is compromised."( Clinical pharmacology of systemic chemotherapeutic agents in skin neoplasms.
Hall, SW; Loo, TL, 1978
)
0.26
" The optimum dosage and frequency of DTIC therapy have not yet been established."( [DTIC in the therapy of solid tumours (author's transl)].
Kokron, O; Pridun, N; Zischinsky, W, 1978
)
0.26
" Dose-response curves determined after single exposures to 60Co gamma radiation indicate that human malignant melanomas remain radioresistant after transplantation in mutant nude mice."( Effect of cobalt-60 gamma rays and DTIC (5-(3,3 dimethyl-1-triazeno)-imidazole-r-carboxamide) on human malignant melanomas grown in athymic nude mice.
Brustad, T; Johannessen, JV; Mossige, J; Rofstad, EK, 1977
)
0.26
" This study indicates that low doses of piperazinedione can produce variable and severe myelosuppression when used in combination with other myelosuppressive agents, and that only small increments in dosage may produce marked increases in the degree of myelosuppression."( Severe myelosuppression from piperazinedione, (NSC No. 135758), cyclophosphamide plus dimethyl-triazeno-imidazole carboxamide (DTIC).
Klahr, C; Presant, CA, 1977
)
0.26
" Wehn 1-(-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea was given in divided dosage at an interval of 8 days, marked and persistent tumor regression was observed."( Chemotherapy of a human malignant melanoma transplanted in the nude mouse.
Jacobsen, GK; Povlsen, CO, 1975
)
0.25
" Dosage was fotemustine 100 mg/m2 and dacarbazine 200 mg/m2 intravenously twice monthly on days 1 and 8, repeated for a maximum of six courses."( Fotemustine plus dacarbazine in advanced stage III malignant melanoma.
Binder, M; Dorffner, R; Glebowski, E; Pehamberger, H; Winkler, A; Wolff, K, 1992
)
0.28
" Regimen B, employing a lower dosage of metoclopramide and steroids and using a more simple schedule of administration should be the preferred treatment."( Antiemetic activity of two different high doses and schedules of metoclopramide in dacarbazine-treated cancer patients.
Basurto, C; Boschetti, E; Bracarda, S; Del Favero, A; Lupattelli, M; Picciafuoco, M; Roila, F; Sassi, M; Tonato, M, 1992
)
0.28
" Dose-response studies indicated that exceedingly high doses of DTIC were necessary to produce antimetastatic effects even when drug treatment was combined with the calcium channel blocker verapamil."( Efficacy of dacarbazine (DTIC) in preventing metastases arising from intraocular melanomas in mice.
Gamel, JW; Niederkorn, JY; Sanborn, GE, 1992
)
0.28
" WHO grade 3-4 toxicity was seen in 27 patients leading to delay and reduced dosage of therapy; in 4 patients treatment was discontinued, 8 patients had no side effects."( A phase II study of metastatic melanoma treated with a combination of interferon alfa 2b, dacarbazine and nimustine.
Gröhn, P; Hakala, T; Heikkinen, M; Jakobsson, M; Korpela, M; Kumpulainen, E; Numminen, S; Nuortio, L; Salmi, R; Vuoristo, MS, 1992
)
0.28
" In a multivariate analysis where both disease-related and treatment-related factors were taken into account drug dosage remained a significant prognostic factor."( Treatment of Hodgkin's disease with MOPP chemotherapy: effect of dose and schedule modification on treatment outcome.
Bezwoda, MA; Bezwoda, WR; Dansey, R, 1990
)
0.28
" Intralymphatic therapy with methanol extraction residue of BCG (MER-BCG) has been tested, and trials are now in progress with IL-2 to assess the optimal dosage by this route."( Role of interferons in the therapy of melanoma.
Ernstoff, MS; Kirkwood, JM, 1990
)
0.28
" A review of cisplatin-based therapy in metastatic melanoma suggests that there is no dose-response relationship."( A phase II trial of high-dose cisplatin and dacarbazine. Lack of efficacy of high-dose, cisplatin-based therapy for metastatic melanoma.
Bajorin, DF; Chapman, PB; Cody-Johnson, BV; Heelan, RT; Lovett, DR; Oettgen, HF; Portlock, CS; Steffens, TA; Templeton, MA; Wong, GY, 1991
)
0.28
" Examination of dose intensity received when combining treatment arms revealed a weak doxorubicin dose-response relationship."( Phase III comparison of doxorubicin and dacarbazine given by bolus versus infusion in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas: a Southwest Oncology Group study.
Baker, LH; Balcerzak, S; Benjamin, RS; Bonnet, JD; Chapman, R; Fletcher, WS; Metch, B; Ryan, J; Weiss, GR; Zalupski, M, 1991
)
0.28
" In a panel of 12 human cancer cell lines [melanoma (4), ovary (2), head and neck (3), lung (1), bladder (1), breast (1)], the dose-response curves of S 10036 (0-100 microM) were similar to those obtained with equimolar concentrations of BCNU and CCNU; they indicated a moderately more marked effect for two and an equal effect for six melanoma cell lines with S 10036 as compared with BCNU."( In vitro chemosensitivity testing of Fotemustine (S 10036), a new antitumor nitrosourea.
Bizzari, JP; Deloffre, P; Etienne, MC; Fischel, JL; Formento, P; Frenay, M; Gioanni, J; Milano, G, 1990
)
0.28
" There was statistically significant greater myelosuppression, stomatitis, and diarrhea in the very high dosage DTIC and melphalan (Regimen A) compared with the other two regimens."( High-dose, double alkylating agent chemotherapy with DTIC, melphalan, or ifosfamide and marrow rescue for metastatic malignant melanoma.
Carr, T; Chadwick, G; Craig, P; Jones, R; Lind, M; Morgenstern, G; Thatcher, D, 1989
)
0.28
" Unlike other methylation-resistant cell types, the neuroblastomas showed an initial decline in the MTIC dose-response profile for cell survival followed by a plateau at higher doses."( Sensitivity of human neuroblastoma to activated dacarbazine: relationships between cell survival, methyltransferase activity and activation of adenovirus-5.
Lihou, MG; Parsons, PG; Smith, PJ, 1988
)
0.27
" Further work is necessary to determine the best combined dosage and method of administration for optimum immunobiological effect."( Recombinant interferon alfa-2a in advanced malignant melanoma. A phase I-II study in combination with DTIC.
Hersey, P; McLeod, GR; Thomson, DB, 1987
)
0.27
" Attenuation schedules and data relating to the total administered dosage should be provided."( Chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma.
Brennan, MF; DeCosse, JJ; Greenall, MJ; Magill, GB, 1986
)
0.27
" Doxorubicin should be administered preferably as 3-weekly bolus injections at doses higher than 60 mg/m2 because of its dose-response relationship."( The treatment of soft tissue sarcomas with focus on chemotherapy: a review.
Pinedo, HM; Verweij, J, 1986
)
0.27
"This study addressed two major questions regarding therapeutic use of Adriamycin ([Adr] Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) in adult soft tissue sarcomas: the influence of dosing schedule and the value of adding imidazole carboxamide (DTIC) to Adr."( Randomized comparison of three adriamycin regimens for metastatic soft tissue sarcomas.
Amato, DA; Borden, EC; Carbone, PP; Creech, RH; Enterline, HT; Lerner, HJ; Rosenbaum, C; Shiraki, MJ, 1987
)
0.27
" All of the compounds of this class had significant activity against the B16 melanoma, with the most active compound, 2-[(methoxycarbonyl)sulfenyl]-1-methyl-1-[(4- methylphenyl)sulfonyl]hydrazine, producing percent T/C values for B16 melanoma tumor bearing mice of between 182 and 232 at dosage levels of from 12."( Synthesis and evaluation of 1-(arylsulfonyl)-2-[(methoxycarbonyl)sulfenyl]-1-methylhydrazines++ + as antineoplastic agents.
Cosby, LA; Hrubiec, RT; Sartorelli, AC; Shyam, K, 1986
)
0.27
" We report a patient with malignant melanoma metastatic to the liver in whom an apparent dose-response relationship to dacarbazine was demonstrated."( Dose-response relationship to dacarbazine demonstrated in a patient with malignant melanoma.
Harrison, BR; Hoelzer, KL; Luedke, DW; Mahanta, B, 1986
)
0.27
" Both cell lines showed a dose-response relationship to DTIC after 1- or 6-hour exposures in the presence or absence of light."( Experimental dacarbazine antitumor activity and skin toxicity in relation to light exposure and pharmacologic antidotes.
Alberts, DS; Dorr, RT; Einspahr, J; Mason-Liddil, N; Soble, M, 1987
)
0.27
" It appears that DTIC hyperthermic isolation perfusion is a safe procedure, however, the total dosage should be below 40 mg/kg to avoid hematologic toxicity."( Toxicity and complications of vascular isolation and hyperthermic perfusion with imidazole carboxamide (DTIC) in melanoma.
Didolkar, MS; Fitzpatrick, JL; Jackson, AJ; Johnston, GS, 1986
)
0.27
"To address the problem of drug dosage as a limiting factor for successful chemotherapy, seven patients with Stage IV neuroblastoma were treated with very high dose cyclophosphamide with imidazole carboximide (DTIC) and vincristine sulfate in conjunction with intensive supportive care."( Very high dose cyclophosphamide with imidazole carboximide and vincristine sulfate in the treatment of stage IV neuroblastoma.
Glaubiger, D; Levine, AS; Magrath, IT; Pizzo, PA; Poplack, DG; Srinivasan, U, 1985
)
0.27
" cytostatic antibiotic), the dosage (20% LD50 vs."( Immunosuppression by cytostatic drugs?
Duncker, D; Müller-Ruchholtz, W; Ulrichs, K; Yu, MY, 1984
)
0.27
" At a dosage equitoxic with that of dimethyltriazenes, cyclophosphamide causes the absence of tumor cells in the peritoneal cavity and in the brains and livers of mice bearing P388 and L1210 leukemias."( Infiltration of liver and brain by tumor cells in leukemic mice: prevention by dimethyltriazenes and cyclophosphamide.
Giraldi, T; Grill, V; Mallardi, F; Perissin, L; Sava, G; Zorzet, S, 1984
)
0.27
" The response achieved with our dose modification was no better than that achieved in several series with conventionally dosed CYVADIC."( Treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas with a modified CYVADIC protocol.
Biran, S; Pfeffer, MR; Sulkes, A, 1984
)
0.27
" Cytostatics are dosed per liter of perfused extremity."( [Technic of isolated perfusion of the extremities. Experience with 171 cases].
Aigner, K; Schwemmle, K, 1983
)
0.27
" The results of pilot clinical trials are reported, including toxicity, timing and dosage studies in 20 patients and subsequent studies of patients with metastatic melanoma treated at three separate centers, using a single lot of purified, allogeneic melanoma TAA."( Pilot studies using melanoma tumor-associated antigens (TAA) in specific-active immunochemotherapy of malignant melanoma.
Arlen, M; Cohen, M; Hollinshead, A; Kundin, WD; Scherrer, J; Tanner, K; Yonemoto, R, 1982
)
0.26
" The results imply that dosage scheduling in the treatment of murine melanomas must be individualized."( Effect of scheduling of combinations of 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)-imidazole-4-carboxamide and 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-(4-methylcyclohexyl)-1-nitrosourea on the Harding-Passey and Cloudman S91 mouse melanomas.
Hill, GJ; Hill, HZ, 1982
)
0.26
" For future administration of Dacarbazine in malignant melanoma (a) patients with pre-existent liver disease should be excluded from DTIC-treatment, (b) the prodromi and cardinal symptoms should be carefully registered and (c) high dosage corticosteroid therapy with fibrinolytic measures should be immediately administered."( [Dacarbazine in malignant melanoma. Rare, severe side-effect: Budd-Chiari-syndrome (author's transl)].
Altenähr, E; Doering, C; Orfanos, CE; Pickartz, H, 1982
)
0.26
" Comparison of various dosage schedules within the same patient did not reveal relevant differences of the areas under the concentration-time curves."( Pharmacokinetics of dacarbazine (DTIC) and its metabolite 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide (AIC) following different dose schedules.
Aigner, K; Breithaupt, H; Dammann, A, 1982
)
0.26
" Side effects were severe however, and it was necessary to discontinue treatment in 5 patients, and modify dosage in 9 other patients."( [Palliative chemotherapy of adult soft tissue sarcomas with an association of cyclophosphamide-vincristine-adriamycine-dacarbazine (CYVADIC) (author's transl)].
Brunet, R; Bui, B; Chauvergne, J; Durand, M, 1981
)
0.26
" A linear dose-response curve was observed for methyl methanesulfonate over a 100-fold dose range."( Methylation of cysteine in hemoglobin following exposure to methylating agents.
Bailey, E; Connors, TA; Farmer, PB; Gorf, SM; Rickard, J, 1981
)
0.26
" Dosage escalation was associated with a higher complete remission rate and lower fatality rate."( Protected environment - prophylactic antibiotic program for malignant sarcomas: randomized trial during remission induction chemotherapy.
Benjamin, RS; Bodey, GP; Burgess, A; Murphy, WK; Rodriguez, V, 1981
)
0.26
" Patients received intravenous DTIC from day 1 at a dosage of 400-500 mg/m2, repeated every 21 days (in the case of good tolerance--25 patients--the dose was increased to 600-800 mg/m2) combined with subcutaneous IFN-alpha 2a (9 x 10(6) U three times/week, increased in the case of good tolerance to 15 x 10(6) U three times/week)."( Dacarbazine and interferon-alpha 2a in advanced malignant melanoma: high response rate and prolongation of response duration occur in different patient subpopulations.
Betticher, DC; Clemons, M; Lee, SM; Morris, C; Thatcher, N, 1995
)
0.29
"The activity of HDI in these pretreated ASTS patients and the apparent circumvention of SDI resistance suggest a real dose-response relationship for ifosfamide and deserve further evaluation."( High-dose ifosfamide: circumvention of resistance to standard-dose ifosfamide in advanced soft tissue sarcomas.
Antoine, E; Brain, E; Fontaine, F; Genin, J; Janin, N; Kayitalire, L; Le Cesne, A; Le Chevalier, T; Spielmann, M; Toussaint, C, 1995
)
0.29
" Toxicity was tolerable, and more than 80% of ideal dosing was achieved during the first two cycles of treatment."( Megestrol melanoma study.
Garrison, M; Nathanson, L,
)
0.13
" Pretreatment of mice with O6-benzylguanine increased temozolomide-induced mortality, requiring reduction of the dosage from 1200 to 750 mg/m2 on the single-day regimen."( Activity of temozolomide in the treatment of central nervous system tumor xenografts.
Bigner, DD; Catino, JJ; Dolan, ME; Friedman, HS; Keir, S; Marcelli, S; Pegg, AE; Schold, SC, 1995
)
0.29
" Since ifosfamide induced unexpectedly higher toxicity, response was corrected based on the shape of the dose-response curve for ifosfamide."( Efficacy of ifosfamide, dacarbazine, doxorubicin and cisplatin in human sarcoma xenografts.
Budach, V; Budach, W; Reipke, P; Scheulen, ME; Schmauder, B; Stuschke, M, 1994
)
0.29
"Dacarbazine (DTIC) is a chemotherapy drug which has antitumor activity at standard doses, exhibits a steep dose-response effect in vitro, and is associated with relatively few non-hematologic toxicities."( A phase I clinical and pharmacological profile of dacarbazine with autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with solid tumors.
Adkins, DR; Boldt, DH; Freytes, C; Irvin, R; Kuhn, J; LeMaistre, CF; Roodman, GD; Salzman, D; Von Hoff, DD,
)
0.13
" We have recently shown wide interindividual variation in the depletion and subsequent regeneration of ATase in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMCs) following DTIC and this has now been extended to ascertain whether or not depletion is related to dosage of DTIC used and repeated treatment cycles of chemotherapy."( Dosage and cycle effects of dacarbazine (DTIC) and fotemustine on O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Dougal, M; Lee, SM; Margison, GP; Thatcher, N, 1993
)
0.29
" A statistically significant relationship was seen between the development of severe haematological toxicity (WHO > or = 3) with increasing dosage of DTIC and significant subclinical pulmonary damage was seen in 11 patients where the lung function was monitored during the course of treatment."( Sequential administration of varying doses of dacarbazine and fotemustine in advanced malignant melanoma.
Lee, SM; Margison, GP; Thatcher, N; Woodcock, AA, 1993
)
0.29
" Comparisons with BCNU were made on both single and multiple dosing schedules, since temozolomide cytotoxicity is highly schedule dependent."( Potentiation of temozolomide and BCNU cytotoxicity by O(6)-benzylguanine: a comparative study in vitro.
May, BL; Newlands, ES; Porteus, JK; Wedge, SR, 1996
)
0.29
" applications of IFN-alpha in 2 MU daily doses from days 1 to 4, completing the treatment with a DTIC application on day 5, given at the same dosage as in Group 1 (Group 2)."( DTIC vs. IFN-alpha plus DTIC in the treatment of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma.
Rudolf, Z; Strojan, P, 1996
)
0.29
") was examined using single and daily x5 dosing regimens in athymic mice bearing subcutaneous A375P xenografts."( Effect of single and multiple administration of an O6-benzylguanine/temozolomide combination: an evaluation in a human melanoma xenograft model.
Newlands, ES; Porteous, JK; Wedge, SR, 1997
)
0.3
" rIFN alpha 2a was administered at the dosage of 3 MIU subcutaneously 3 times a week until progression."( Fotemustine and dacarbazine plus recombinant interferon alpha 2a in thetreatment of advanced melanoma.
Caponigro, F; Casaretti, R; Comella, G; Comella, P; Daponte, A; Fiore, F; Frasci, G; Gravina, A; Ionna, F; Mozzillo, N; Parziale, AP; Presutti, F, 1997
)
0.3
" Further follow-up is required to assess the effect of dosage and the effect on survival and late toxicities."( BEACOPP, a new dose-escalated and accelerated regimen, is at least as effective as COPP/ABVD in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: interim report from a trial of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group.
Bischoff, H; Diehl, V; Duehmke, E; Engert, A; Franklin, J; Georgii, A; Glunz, A; Haedicke, C; Hasenclever, D; Hermann, R; Holmer, L; Krause, S; Lathan, B; Loeffler, M; Paulus, U; Pfreundschuh, M; Rueffer, JU; Sextro, M; Sieber, M; Stappert-Jahn, U; Tesch, H; von Kalle, K; Winnerlein-Trump, E; Wolf, J; Wulf, G, 1998
)
0.3
"Thirty-three patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and five patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) were treated with Temodal at a starting dose of 200 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days with repeat dosing every 28 days after the first daily dose."( DNA mismatch repair and O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase analysis and response to Temodal in newly diagnosed malignant glioma.
Ashley, DM; Bigner, DD; Bigner, SH; Cokgor, I; Colvin, OM; Dugan, M; Friedman, AH; Friedman, HS; Haglund, MM; Henry, AJ; Kerby, T; Krischer, J; Lovell, S; Marchev, F; McLendon, RE; Modrich, PL; Provenzale, JM; Rasheed, K; Rich, J; Seman, AJ; Stewart, E, 1998
)
0.3
" Following 1 cycle of MAID at the standard dose, four patients were to be treated at each of five dosage levels: +25%, +45%, +65%, +85%, +100%."( Phase I-II trial of intensification of the MAID regimen with support of lenograstim (rHuG-CSF) in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS).
Bui, BN; Chevallier, B; Chevreau, C; Coindre, JM; Cour-Chabernaud, V; Gil, B; Krakowski, I; Maugard, C; Mihura, J, 1999
)
0.3
" We attempted to improve its efficacy and decrease its toxicity by using decrescendo dosing of interleukin-2 (IL-2), posttreatment granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and low-dose tamoxifen."( Advantages of concurrent biochemotherapy modified by decrescendo interleukin-2, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and tamoxifen for patients with metastatic melanoma.
Boasberg, PD; Cannon, M; Edwards, S; Essner, R; Fawzy, NW; Foshag, LJ; Fournier, P; Gammon, G; Guo, M; Johnson, TD; Kristedja, TS; Martin, MA; Morton, DL; O'Day, SJ; Stern, S; Weisberg, M, 1999
)
0.3
" Decrescendo IL-2 dosing and administration of G-CSF seemed to reduce toxicity, length of hospital stay, and readmission rates."( Advantages of concurrent biochemotherapy modified by decrescendo interleukin-2, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and tamoxifen for patients with metastatic melanoma.
Boasberg, PD; Cannon, M; Edwards, S; Essner, R; Fawzy, NW; Foshag, LJ; Fournier, P; Gammon, G; Guo, M; Johnson, TD; Kristedja, TS; Martin, MA; Morton, DL; O'Day, SJ; Stern, S; Weisberg, M, 1999
)
0.3
"Patients were randomized to receive either oral temozolomide at a starting dosage of 200 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days every 28 days or intravenous (IV) DTIC at a starting dosage of 250 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days every 21 days."( Randomized phase III study of temozolomide versus dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic malignant melanoma.
Aamdal, S; Aaronson, N; Cebon, J; Coates, A; Dreno, B; Fierlbeck, G; Fraass, U; Gore, M; Grob, JJ; Henz, M; Kapp, A; Middleton, MR; Muller, M; Schadendorf, D; Seiter, S; Statkevich, P; Thatcher, N; Tilgen, W; Weiss, J, 2000
)
0.31
" This review discusses the mechanism of action of TMZ and strategies for overcoming pathways of resistance to this promising agent, including the use of TMZ in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents or radiation therapy, and exploration of alternate dosing schedules."( Future directions in the treatment of malignant gliomas with temozolomide.
Prados, MD, 2000
)
0.31
"The combination of GM-CSF with biochemotherapy is feasible and there appears to be a dose-response relationship with GM-CSF in terms of host immunological response, and possibly clinical efficacy."( GM-CSF with biochemotherapy (cisplatin, DTIC, tamoxifen, IL-2 and interferon-alpha): a phase I trial in melanoma.
A'Hern, RP; Ayliffe, MJ; Eisen, T; Gore, ME; Hill, ME; Johnston, SR; Moore, J; Riches, PG; Thomas, JM; Vaughan, MM, 2000
)
0.31
" One day after the last dose of vehicle or TNP-470, a steady-state dosing regimen of TMZ was administered with subsequent collection and high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of plasma and either tumor homogenate or tumor microdialysis steady-state TMZ concentrations, and in some cases [5-(3-methyltriazen-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboximide] MTIC, its active metabolite."( Pharmacodynamic-mediated reduction of temozolomide tumor concentrations by the angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470.
Chu, J; Gallo, JM; Li, S; Ma, J; Pulfer, S; Reed, K, 2001
)
0.31
" In this study, we evaluated the relation between TMZ dosing and AGT depletion in patients with deep visceral tumors and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) to determine whether the dose of TMZ was sufficient to inactivate AGT and lead to therapeutic efficacy."( Temozolomide: the effect of once- and twice-a-day dosing on tumor tissue levels of the DNA repair protein O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase.
Gerson, SL; Haaga, J; Liu, L; Majka, S; Spiro, TP; Willson, JK, 2001
)
0.31
" For patients with recurrent malignant glioma, temozolomide provides a therapeutic option with a predictable safety profile, clinical efficacy, and convenient dosing that can provide important quality-of-life benefits."( Temozolomide for recurrent high-grade glioma.
Macdonald, DR, 2001
)
0.31
" Also under investigation are modifications to the temozolomide dosing schedule, other routes of administration, and treatment regimens that include temozolomide in combination with other chemotherapeutic and biologic agents."( Future directions for temozolomide therapy.
Yung, WK, 2001
)
0.31
" The recommended dosage for TEMO for a phase II study of this combination is 200 mg/m2 per day for 5 days."( Phase I study of Gliadel wafers plus temozolomide in adults with recurrent supratentorial high-grade gliomas.
Affronti, ML; Cokgor, L; Early, M; Edwards, S; Friedman, AH; Friedman, HS; Gururangan, S; Herndon, JE; McLendon, RE; Provenzale, JM; Quinn, JA; Rich, JN; Sampson, JH; Stafford-Fox, V; Tourt-Uhlig, S; Zaknoen, S, 2001
)
0.31
" In patients with advanced stage soft tissue sarcomas (ASTS), a dose-response relationship has been established for doxorubicin and ifosfamide."( [High-dose chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas of adults].
Biron, P; Blay, JY; Ray-Coquard, I, 2001
)
0.31
" The standard dosage is 150-200 mg/m2 per day for 5 days in a 28-day cycle."( A phase II study of extended low-dose temozolomide in recurrent malignant gliomas.
Abrey, LE; Bazylewicz, KA; Khan, RB; Malkin, MG; Raizer, JJ, 2002
)
0.31
" Despite prompt initiation of antimycotic therapy the outcome was fatal; dosage of conventional and liposomal amphotericin B was limited due to treatment-related toxicities."( A novel type of metastatically spreading subcutaneous aspergillosis without epidermal lesions following allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Bethe, U; Cornely, OA; Pels, H; Ritzkowsky, A; Seibold, M; Soehngen, D; Toepelt, K, 2001
)
0.31
"To evaluate the antitumor effects and toxicities of whole brain irradiation (WBI) with temozolomide (TMZ) administered by prolonged oral dosing in patients with melanoma metastatic to the brain."( Temozolomide and whole brain irradiation in melanoma metastatic to the brain: a phase II trial of the Cytokine Working Group.
Atkins, B; Clark, I; Dutcher, P; Ernstoff, S; Flaherty, L; Gollob, J; II Smith, W; Johnson, D; Longmate, J; Margolin, K; Sosman, J; Thompson, A; Weber, J; Weiss, G, 2002
)
0.31
" This review will focus on the different pharmacological strategies aimed at overcoming tumor resistance to TMZ such as new formulations of the drug or dosing schedules, and combined treatments with other chemotherapeutic agents, modulators of DNA repair systems, or gene therapy."( Pharmacological strategies to increase the antitumor activity of methylating agents.
Graziani, G; Tentori, L, 2002
)
0.31
" Assuming linearity of the dose-response effect, the point estimate was used to calculate a doubling dose for the induction of heritable translocations of 12 mg/kg."( Induction of chromosomal aberrations by dacarbazine in somatic and germinal cells of mice.
Adler, ID; Jentsch, I; Kliesch, U; Speicher, MR, 2002
)
0.31
" However, the dose-response relationship was acute."( Relation between Irofulven (MGI-114) systemic exposure and tumor response in human solid tumor xenografts.
Billups, C; Cheshire, PJ; Fouladi, M; Friedman, HS; Houghton, PJ; Leggas, M; Peterson, JK; Stewart, CF; Woo, MH, 2002
)
0.31
" The drug is well tolerated with dose limiting myelosuppression and thrombocytopenia occurring in less than 10% of patients at current dosage schedules."( The use of temozolomide in recurrent malignant gliomas.
Gaya, A; Greenstein, A; Rees, J; Stebbing, J, 2002
)
0.31
" Body surface area-based dosing was statistically significantly associated with a reduction in interpatient variability in drug clearance for only five of the 33 agents: docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil/eniluracil, paclitaxel, temozolomide, and troxacitabine."( Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991-2001.
Baker, SD; Donehower, RC; Grochow, LB; Rowinsky, EK; Schellens, JH; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J, 2002
)
0.31
"We assessed whether split dosing with the methylating agent DTIC is an effective strategy for inactivating the DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine DNA-ATase in order to decrease tumour resistance to BCNU."( Pharmacokinetic, biochemical and clinical effects of dimethyltriazenoimidazole-4-carboxamide-bischloroethylnitrosourea combination therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.
Clemons, M; El Teraifi, H; Griffiths, A; Howell, A; Kelly, J; Margison, GP; Margison, JM; Morris, CQ; Ranson, M, 2003
)
0.32
" Two patients in the first triplet had G3-G4 local toxicity, so that the scheduled F dosage was halved."( Phase I-II study on isolation antiblastic fotemustine perfusion after dacarbazine chemosensitization for advanced melanoma of the extremities.
De Salvo, GL; Foletto, M; Lejeune, FJ; Lise, M; Lopes, M; Mocellin, S; Pilati, PL; Pontes, L; Ribeiro, M; Rossi, CR, 2003
)
0.32
" For example, Abdelbasit and Plackett proposed an optimal design assuming that the dose-response relationship follows some specified linear models."( Experimental design and sample size determination for testing synergism in drug combination studies based on uniform measures.
Fang, HB; Houghton, PJ; Tan, M; Tian, GL, 2003
)
0.32
" The model is fit to serial ANC measurements obtained after TMZ dosing and it is able to explain, among other things, the lag in ANC reduction following a dose of TMZ, the ANC nadir, and the 'rebound effect' observed where the ANC recovers to levels greater than that observed pre-TMZ dose."( A mechanistic mathematical model of temozolomide myelosuppression in children with high-grade gliomas.
Fouladi, M; Gajjar, AJ; Kirstein, MN; Nair, G; Panetta, JC; Stewart, CF, 2003
)
0.32
" In the last 2 years, studies have focused on exploring strategies to optimize the efficacy of temozolomide, including evaluating different temozolomide dosing schedules and combining temozolomide with other antineoplastic agents, radiation therapy, or drug resistance-modifying agents."( Temozolomide: realizing the promise and potential.
Dolan, ME; Nagasubramanian, R, 2003
)
0.32
" Temozolomide has activity and a favorable safety profile in all dosing schedules tested."( Temozolomide: realizing the promise and potential.
Dolan, ME; Nagasubramanian, R, 2003
)
0.32
" Extended TMZ dosing regimens may be superior by delivering the drug continuously at a higher dose over time."( Selective CD4+ lymphopenia in melanoma patients treated with temozolomide: a toxicity with therapeutic implications.
Chapman, PB; Foster, T; Krown, SE; Livingston, PO; Quinn, C; Sepkowitz, KA; Sohn, S; Su, YB; Williams, L; Wolchok, JD, 2004
)
0.32
" Alternate temozolomide dosing schedules such as continuous daily administration may enhance antitumor activity through sustained depletion of the DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase."( Temozolomide in patients with advanced cancer: phase I and pharmacokinetic study.
Baker, SD; Batra, VK; Cutler, DL; Donehower, RC; Rudek, MA; Statkevich, P, 2004
)
0.32
" In phase II of the study, four weeks after completion of RT, a monochemotherapy using TMZ was administered at the dosage of 200 mg/m2/day per 5 days every 28 days for 6 cycles."( Temozolomide in radio-chemotherapy combined treatment for newly-diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: phase II clinical trial.
Campanella, C; Costa, A; Fedele, F; Frati, A; Frati, L; Gagliardi, FM; Innocenzi, G; Lanzetta, G; Minniti, G; Nappa, M; Rozzi, A; Salvati, M; Vecchione, A,
)
0.13
" This observation suggests a strategy of individualized dosing adapted to hematotoxicity."( Low acute hematological toxicity during chemotherapy predicts reduced disease control in advanced Hodgkin's disease.
Brosteanu, O; Diehl, V; Hasenclever, D; Loeffler, M, 2004
)
0.32
" Median thalidomide dosage was 200 mg/day."( Combined thalidomide and temozolomide treatment in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.
Baumann, F; Baumert, BG; Bernays, RL; Bjeljac, M; Brandner, S; Kollias, SS; Rousson, V; Yonekawa, Y,
)
0.13
" IC(50) values were calculated from dose-response relationships using cell counts and a formazan dye assay (WST-1)."( Cytotoxic activity of camptothecin and paclitaxel in newly established continuous human medullary thyroid carcinoma cell lines.
Hamilton, G; Kaczirek, K; Mittlböck, M; Niederle, B; Passler, C; Pfragner, R; Prager, G; Raderer, M; Scheuba, C; Schindl, M; Siegl, V; Weinhäusel, A, 2004
)
0.32
"The response rate, efficacy, side-effects, reasons for discontinuation of therapy and survival rate of 47 patients treated with temozolomide in combination with two different dosing regimens of IFN-alpha 2b were documented."( Temozolomide and interferon alpha 2b in metastatic melanoma stage IV.
Fialla, R; Forstinger, Ch; Fritsch, P; Hofmann-Wellenhof, R; Kehrer, H; Kerl, H; Kindermann-Glebowski, E; Klein, G; Koller, J; Konrad, K; Kos, C; Lang, A; Mischer, P; Pachinger, W; Pehamberger, H; Raml, J; Ratzinger, G; Richtig, E; Seeber, A; Smolle, J; Steiner, A; Ulmer, H; Wolff, K; Zelger, B, 2004
)
0.32
"We conducted a study to determine the dose-limiting toxicity of an extended dosing schedule of temozolomide (TMZ) when used with a fixed dose of BCNU, or 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (carmustine), taking advantage of TMZ's ability to deplete O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase and the synergistic activity of these two agents."( Phase 1 study of 28-day, low-dose temozolomide and BCNU in the treatment of malignant gliomas after radiation therapy.
Abrey, LE; Kleber, M; Malkin, MG; Raizer, JJ, 2004
)
0.32
" We develop a maximum likelihood method based on the expectation/conditional maximization (ECM) algorithm to estimate the dose-response relationship while accounting for the informative censoring and the constraints of model parameters."( Repeated-measures models with constrained parameters for incomplete data in tumour xenograft experiments.
Fang, HB; Houghton, PJ; Tan, M; Tian, GL, 2005
)
0.33
" Attempts to maximise efficacy have led to manipulation of both dosage and drug scheduling and the evidence for the various strategies is reviewed."( Temozolomide in the treatment of solid tumours: current results and rationale for dosing/scheduling.
Middleton, MR; Payne, MJ; Pratap, SE, 2005
)
0.33
"Temozolomide has been studied in soft-tissue sarcomas with varying dosing schedules."( Temozolomide in uterine leiomyosarcomas.
Aghajanian, C; Anderson, S, 2005
)
0.33
" Cisplatin-temozolomide combinations are well tolerated without additional toxicity to single-agent treatments; the recommended phase II dosage is 80 mg m(-2) cisplatin and 150 mg m(-2) x 5 temozolomide in heavily treated, and 200 mg m(-2) x 5 temozolomide in less-heavily pretreated children."( Dose finding and O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase study of cisplatin combined with temozolomide in paediatric solid malignancies.
Chastagner, P; Couanet, D; Djafari, L; Doz, F; Frappaz, D; Gentet, JC; Geoerger, B; Geoffray, A; Margison, GP; O'Quigley, J; Pein, F; Raquin, MA; Rubie, H; Vassal, G; Wartelle, M; Watson, AJ, 2005
)
0.33
"The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of Temozolomide (TMZ) administered for 5 consecutive days in three daily dosing in children with recurrent or refractory high-grade glioma."( Phase II trial of temozolomide in children with recurrent high-grade glioma.
Abate, ME; Attinà, G; Caldarelli, M; Cefalo, G; Clerico, A; Colosimo, C; Di Rocco, C; Garré, ML; Lazzareschi, I; Madon, E; Massimino, M; Maurizi, P; Mazzarella, G; Riccardi, R; Ridola, V; Ruggiero, A; Sandri, A, 2006
)
0.33
"We identified a transcriptomic signature that predicts a common in vitro and in vivo resistance phenotype to these agents, a proportion of which is imprinted recurrently by gene dosage changes in the resistant glioblastoma genome."( Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced protein 3 as a putative regulator of nuclear factor-kappaB-mediated resistance to O6-alkylating agents in human glioblastomas.
Bredel, C; Bredel, M; Duran, GE; Harsh, GR; Juric, D; Recht, LD; Scheck, AC; Sikic, BI; Vogel, H; Yu, RX, 2006
)
0.33
" We reviewed the charts of patients diagnosed with Hodgkin's lymphoma between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2002 who were treated with ABVD chemotherapy, and seen at the University of Iowa with complete diagnosis, staging, and treatment dosing records."( Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with doxorubicin (Adriamycin), bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy.
Chand, VK; Link, BK; Ritchie, JM; Shannon, M; Wooldridge, JE, 2006
)
0.33
" Extended dosing has met with early favourable results."( Exploiting the role of O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) in cancer therapy.
Middleton, MR; Sabharwal, A, 2006
)
0.33
" There was no particular dose-response of dacarbazine on any parameters tested."( Dacarbazine induces genotoxic and cytotoxic germ cell damage with concomitant decrease in testosterone and increase in lactate dehydrogenase concentration in the testis.
Bairy, KL; D'Souza, UJ; Gopalakrishna, K; Kumar, SG; Narayana, K; Samuel, VP, 2006
)
0.33
" Temozolomide and capecitabine were administered concomitantly to 4 sequential cohorts at different dosing levels on Days 1-5 and Days 8-12, with cycles repeated every 21 days until disease progression."( Phase I study of capecitabine in combination with temozolomide in the treatment of patients with brain metastases from breast carcinoma.
Arun, B; Broglio, K; Buchholz, T; Francis, D; Groves, M; Hortobagyi, GN; Meyers, C; Rivera, E; Valero, V; Yin, G, 2006
)
0.33
" Three patients (12%) were changed to standard temozolomide dosing due to side effects, including intractable nausea (n = 2) and multiple cytopenias (n = 1)."( Toxicity and efficacy of protracted low dose temozolomide for the treatment of low grade gliomas.
Gasco, J; Pouratian, N; Schiff, D; Shaffrey, ME; Sherman, JH, 2007
)
0.34
"Dose-limiting adverse effects of thrombocytopenia and leukopenia prevent augmentation of current temozolomide (TMZ) dosing protocols; therefore, we hypothesized that the direct intracranial delivery of TMZ would lead to improved efficacy in an animal model of malignant glioma in an animal model."( Local delivery of temozolomide by biodegradable polymers is superior to oral administration in a rodent glioma model.
Brem, H; Brem, S; Caplan, J; Legnani, F; Li, K; Pradilla, G; Tyler, B, 2007
)
0.34
"Metronomic dosed (MD) chemotherapy as opposed to conventional dosed (CD) chemotherapy is considered an alternate strategy to target angiogenesis and limit host toxicity."( Preclinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of metronomic and conventional temozolomide dosing regimens.
Gallo, JM; Guo, P; Nuthalapati, S; Wang, X; Zhou, Q, 2007
)
0.34
" Subsequently the tumor recurred and the patient had a dramatic and durable response to standard 5 day dosing of adjuvant temozolomide."( Durable response of a radiation-induced, high-grade cerebellar glioma to temozolomide.
Doherty, LM; Drappatz, J; Kesari, S; Monje, ML; Ramakrishna, NR; Wen, PY; Young, G, 2007
)
0.34
"The efficacy of LM and TMZ in the current dosing schedule is similar to that of TMZ alone."( Randomized trial of the combination of lomeguatrib and temozolomide compared with temozolomide alone in chemotherapy naive patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
Baka, S; Beith, J; Davis, ID; Harris, PA; Haydon, A; Hersey, P; Kefford, RF; Margison, GP; McArthur, GA; Middleton, MR; Mortimer, P; Ranson, M; Sabharwal, A; Seebaran, A; Thompson, D; Watson, AJ, 2007
)
0.34
" The preclinical pharmacokinetic model was scaled to predict temozolomide concentrations in human CSF, normal brain, and brain tumor, and through a series of Monte Carlo simulations, the accumulation of temozolomide in brain tumors under conditions of altered blood-brain barrier permeability, fractional blood volume, and clinical dosing schedules was evaluated."( Predicting human tumor drug concentrations from a preclinical pharmacokinetic model of temozolomide brain disposition.
Gallo, JM; Guo, P; Kruh, GD; Vicini, P; Wang, X; Zhou, Q, 2007
)
0.34
" Through a series of model simulations, it was shown that the brain tumor accumulation of temozolomide varied substantially based on changes in blood-brain barrier permeability and fractional tumor blood volume but minimally based on clinical dosing regimens."( Predicting human tumor drug concentrations from a preclinical pharmacokinetic model of temozolomide brain disposition.
Gallo, JM; Guo, P; Kruh, GD; Vicini, P; Wang, X; Zhou, Q, 2007
)
0.34
"A physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approach offers a means to translate preclinical to clinical characteristics of drug disposition in target tissues and, thus, a means to select appropriate drug dosing regimens for achieving optimal target tissue drug concentrations."( Predicting human tumor drug concentrations from a preclinical pharmacokinetic model of temozolomide brain disposition.
Gallo, JM; Guo, P; Kruh, GD; Vicini, P; Wang, X; Zhou, Q, 2007
)
0.34
"The effects of 'metronomic' or extended chemotherapy dosing schedules (ECS) are mediated through poorly understood anti-angiogenic mechanisms."( Metronomic chemotherapy dosing-schedules with estramustine and temozolomide act synergistically with anti-VEGFR-2 antibody to cause inhibition of human umbilical venous endothelial cell growth.
Greenman, J; Hetherington, JW; Lam, T; Little, S; Maraveyas, A, 2007
)
0.34
" Single-dose temozolomide at five dosage levels (267, 355, 472, 628, and 835 mg/m(2)) was given at least 6 h after completion of O(6)-benzylguanine bolus."( Phase I trial of single-dose temozolomide and continuous administration of o6-benzylguanine in children with brain tumors: a pediatric brain tumor consortium report.
Boyett, JM; Broniscer, A; Danks, MK; Friedman, HS; Gajjar, A; Goldman, S; Gururangan, S; Kun, LE; MacDonald, TJ; Packer, RJ; Poussaint, TY; Stewart, CF; Wallace, D, 2007
)
0.34
" Because preclinical studies suggested that a twice-daily dosing schedule might be more effective, the safety and efficacy of twice-daily dosing of temozolomide were studied in patients with recurrent gliomas at their first, second, or third recurrence."( Multi-institutional phase II study of temozolomide administered twice daily in the treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas.
Alavi, J; Balmaceda, C; Chen, J; Cheung, YK; Fine, RL; Fisher, PG; Pannullo, S; Peereboom, D; Sisti, M, 2008
)
0.35
"Twice-daily dosing may enhance the efficacy of temozolomide in the treatment of recurrent gliomas without increasing toxicity."( Multi-institutional phase II study of temozolomide administered twice daily in the treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas.
Alavi, J; Balmaceda, C; Chen, J; Cheung, YK; Fine, RL; Fisher, PG; Pannullo, S; Peereboom, D; Sisti, M, 2008
)
0.35
" It may also allow a reduction in dosage and a decrease in systemic toxicity."( Solid lipid nanoparticles of temozolomide: potential reduction of cardial and nephric toxicity.
Bi, X; Dou, M; Huang, G; Zhang, N, 2008
)
0.35
" Lower dosing of TMZ also is associated with a more beneficial toxicity profile."( Radiochemotherapy in patients with primary glioblastoma comparing two temozolomide dose regimens.
Bischof, M; Combs, SE; Debus, J; Edler, L; Rausch, R; Schulz-Ertner, D; Wagner, F; Wagner, J; Welzel, T; Zabel-du Bois, A, 2008
)
0.35
" The patients were divided into two groups according to the chemotherapy (3-7 treatment cycles): with DTIC-given orally daily for 5 days, every 3 weeks as a single 2200 mg/kg dose and with the combination-DTIC (the same dose) + CCNU-administered orally at a dosage of 120 mg/m(2) once every 40 days in accordance with protocols, approved by the Bulgarian Ministry of Health."( Influence of therapy on the antioxidant status in patients with melanoma.
Dimov, A; Gadjeva, V; Georgieva, N, 2008
)
0.35
" Accordingly, a clinical trial using oral temozolomide (TMZ) and subcutaneous PEG-interferon alpha-2b (PEG) in patients with metastatic melanoma was designed to determine the maximal tolerated dosage of both drugs and the antitumoral response."( Temozolomide associated with PEG-interferon in patients with metastatic melanoma: a multicenter prospective phase I/II study.
Bedane, C; Cupissol, D; Delaunay, M; Dereure, O; Dreno, B; Guillot, B; Khamari, A; Picot, MC, 2008
)
0.35
" Further studies using ATO and AA with TMZ with this dosing schedule in advanced melanoma are not warranted."( Phase II trial of arsenic trioxide and ascorbic acid with temozolomide in patients with metastatic melanoma with or without central nervous system metastases.
Bael, TE; Gollob, JA; Peterson, BL, 2008
)
0.35
" Imatinib doses up to 1,000 mg/day for 8 consecutive days are well tolerated when combined with standard TMZ dosing for MG patients."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of dose-intensive imatinib mesylate plus temozolomide: phase 1 trial in adults with malignant glioma.
Desjardins, A; Egorin, MJ; Friedman, AH; Friedman, HS; Gururangan, S; Herndon, JE; Lagattuta, TF; McLendon, R; Quinn, JA; Reardon, DA; Rich, JN; Salvado, AJ; Sathornsumetee, S; Vredenburgh, JJ, 2008
)
0.35
" Noninvasive imaging of apoptosis facilitates optimization of therapeutic protocols regarding dosing and schedule and enables identification of efficacious combination therapies."( Noninvasive imaging of apoptosis and its application in cancer therapeutics.
Coppola, JM; Rehemtulla, A; Ross, BD, 2008
)
0.35
" If further studies are to be performed, emerging data suggest that higher daily doses of lomeguatrib and a dosing period beyond that of TMZ should be evaluated."( A phase II trial of lomeguatrib and temozolomide in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Khan, OA; Levitt, NC; Margison, GP; Michael, M; Middleton, MR; Midgley, R; Mortimer, P; Olver, I; Ranson, M; Watson, AJ, 2008
)
0.35
" Several preliminary studies have been initiated to address the issue of resistance and suppression of MGMT activity, and have used alternative temozolomide dosing schedules and O(6)-guanine mimetic agents as substrates for MGMT."( Mechanisms of disease: temozolomide and glioblastoma--look to the future.
Chamberlain, MC; Mrugala, MM, 2008
)
0.35
" A variety of dosing schedules that increase the duration of exposure and the cumulative dose of temozolomide are currently being investigated for the treatment of glioma, with the goal of improving antitumor activity and overcoming resistance."( New (alternative) temozolomide regimens for the treatment of glioma.
Platten, M; Weller, M; Wick, W, 2009
)
0.35
" The toxicity of the dose-intense pre-RT regimen used in this study may warrant evaluation of other, less intense dosing strategies."( Phase II trial of preirradiation and concurrent temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and mixed anaplastic oligoastrocytomas: RTOG BR0131.
Berkey, B; Biggs, C; Blumenthal, DT; Brown, P; Giannini, C; Herman, J; Jenkins, R; Macdonald, D; Mehta, M; Peereboom, D; Schultz, C; Suh, JH; Vogelbaum, MA, 2009
)
0.35
" Consistent with a functional significance of MGMT induction, treatment of GBM43 with a protracted low-dose TMZ regimen was significantly less effective than a shorter high-dose regimen, while survival for GBM14 was improved with the protracted dosing regimen."( Induction of MGMT expression is associated with temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma xenografts.
Carlson, BL; Decker, PA; Grogan, PT; James, CD; Kitange, GJ; Lamont, JD; Sarkaria, JN; Schroeder, MA; Wu, W, 2009
)
0.35
" Extended ABT-888 dosing schedules showed no advantage compared to simultaneous TMZ administration."( The PARP inhibitor, ABT-888 potentiates temozolomide: correlation with drug levels and reduction in PARP activity in vivo.
Bontcheva-Diaz, VD; Bouska, JJ; Bukofzer, G; Colon-Lopez, M; Donawho, CK; Frost, DJ; Giranda, VL; Guan, R; Jarvis, K; Johnson, EF; Klinghofer, V; Liu, X; Luo, Y; Olson, A; Palma, JP; Penning, TD; Rodriguez, LE; Rosenberg, SH; Saltarelli, MJ; Shi, Y; Stavropoulos, JA; Zhu, GD,
)
0.13
" The system analysis technique, embodied in the convolution integral, generated an impulse response function that, when convolved with temozolomide plasma concentration input functions, yielded predicted normal brain and brain tumor temozolomide concentration profiles for different temozolomide dosing regimens (75-200 mg/m(2)/d)."( A new model for prediction of drug distribution in tumor and normal tissues: pharmacokinetics of temozolomide in glioma patients.
Aboagye, EO; Brock, CS; Gallo, JM; Price, PM; Rosso, L; Saleem, A; Turkheimer, FE, 2009
)
0.35
" The inhibition of the target in non-tumour peripheral blood cells (taken as a potential surrogate marker) was measured periodically, and valproate dosing adjusted with the attempt to reach a measurable inhibition."( A phase I-II study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid plus chemoimmunotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma.
Ballarini, M; Contegno, F; Croci, D; Goldhirsch, A; Minucci, S; Munzone, E; Nolè, F; Pelicci, PG; Rocca, A; Salmaggi, A; Testori, A; Tosti, G, 2009
)
0.35
"O(6)-BG when added to a 1-day dosing regimen of temozolomide was able to restore temozolomide sensitivity in patients with temozolomide-resistant anaplastic glioma, but there seemed to be no significant restoration of temozolomide sensitivity in patients with temozolomide-resistant GBM."( Phase II trial of temozolomide plus o6-benzylguanine in adults with recurrent, temozolomide-resistant malignant glioma.
Bigner, DD; Desjardins, A; Friedman, AH; Friedman, HS; Gururangan, S; Herndon, JE; Jiang, SX; McLendon, RE; Quinn, JA; Reardon, DA; Rich, JN; Sampson, JH; Vredenburgh, JJ; Walker, A, 2009
)
0.35
" It has become common practice to re-expose patients to TMZ who had been previously treated with TMZ, or to switch patients to alternative dosing regimens of TMZ when there are signs of relapse or progress on standard TMZ therapeutic regimens."( Rechallenge with temozolomide in patients with recurrent gliomas.
Bogdahn, U; Hau, P; Jauch, T; Pascher, C; Weller, M; Wick, A; Wick, W, 2009
)
0.35
"This phase I clinical trial conducted with patients who had recurrent or progressive malignant glioma (MG) was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of three different 5-day dosing regimens of temozolomide (TMZ) in combination with O(6)-benzylguanine (O(6)-BG)."( Phase I trial of temozolomide plus O6-benzylguanine 5-day regimen with recurrent malignant glioma.
Bigner, DD; Desjardins, A; Friedman, AH; Friedman, HS; Gururangan, S; Herndon, JE; Jiang, SX; McLendon, RE; Quinn, JA; Reardon, DA; Rich, JN; Sampson, JH; Vredenburgh, JJ; Walker, A, 2009
)
0.35
"Lomeguatrib, an O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase inactivator, was evaluated in an extended dosing regimen with temozolomide, designed according to pharmacodynamic data from previous studies."( A phase I study of extended dosing with lomeguatrib with temozolomide in patients with advanced melanoma.
Abdi, E; Beith, J; Corrie, PG; Kefford, RF; Kotasek, D; Margison, GP; Middleton, MR; Mortimer, P; Palmer, C; Ranson, M; Thomas, NP; Watson, AJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Early recovery of MGMT activity in tumours suggested that more protracted dosing with LM is required."( O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase depletion and DNA damage in patients with melanoma treated with temozolomide alone or with lomeguatrib.
Beith, J; Davis, ID; Haydon, A; Hayward, O; Hersey, P; Kefford, R; Lorigan, P; Margison, GP; McArthur, G; McGown, G; Middleton, MR; Mortimer, P; Ranson, M; Sabharwal, A; Thomson, D; Thorncroft, M; Watson, AJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Regarding the dosing schedule and administration scheme, as well as the co-administration with other anticancer drugs, a C score was attributed for the off label situations."( [Prescription guidebook for temozolomide usage in brain tumors].
Borget, I; Brignone, M; Cartalat-Carel, S; Chinot, O; Hassani, Y; Taillandier, L; Taillibert, S; Tilleul, P, 2009
)
0.35
"Alternative dosing schedules of temozolomide may improve survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) by increasing the therapeutic index, overcoming common mechanisms of temozolomide resistance, or both."( Randomized phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy followed by either dose-dense or metronomic temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Abrey, LE; Clarke, JL; DeAngelis, LM; Gavrilovic, I; Hormigo, A; Iwamoto, FM; Karimi, S; Lassman, AB; Nolan, CP; Panageas, K; Sul, J, 2009
)
0.35
" Alternative dosing regimens, such as 1-week on/1-week off, or 3-week on/1-week off, that deliver more prolonged exposure have been observed to result in higher cumulative doses than the standard 5-day regimen and may deplete tumor-derived O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in tumor cells, thus sensitizing tumor cells to the effects of TMZ."( [Treatment of glioma with temozolomide].
Nishikawa, R, 2009
)
0.35
" Neither the extent of the initial resection nor dexamethasone dosing was associated with pseudoprogression."( Population-based study of pseudoprogression after chemoradiotherapy in GBM.
Cairncross, JG; de Robles, PA; Dharmawardene, M; Easaw, JC; Forsyth, PA; Hamilton, MG; Magliocco, AM; McIntyre, JB; Parney, IF; Roldán, GB; Scott, JN; Yan, ES, 2009
)
0.35
" Afterward, adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy was discontinued in one patient and the dosage of TMZ was reduced in the other."( Patient-tailored, imaging-guided, long-term temozolomide chemotherapy in patients with glioblastoma.
Backes, H; Brunn, A; Burghaus, L; Galldiks, N; Heiss, WD; Jacobs, AH; Kracht, LW; Ullrich, RT, 2010
)
0.36
" The present findings suggest that glucocorticoid-regulated oscillation in the hepatic MGMT expression is the underlying cause of dosing time-dependent changes in DTIC-induced hepatotoxicity."( Glucocorticoid-dependent expression of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene modulates dacarbazine-induced hepatotoxicity in mice.
Egawa, T; Horiguchi, M; Kaji, H; Kim, J; Koyanagi, S; Makino, K; Matsunaga, N; Ohdo, S, 2010
)
0.36
" 44 of the patients underwent chemo-radiotherapy with Temodal dosed 75 mg/m2, and the rest 135 ones received RT alone."( Postoperative chemo-radiotherapy with temodal in patients with glioblastoma multiforme--survival rates and prognostic factors.
Radev, LR; Semerdjieva, ML; Vlaikova, MI; Yaneva, MP,
)
0.13
" In addition, various protracted temozolomide dosing schedules have been evaluated as a strategy to further enhance its anti-tumor activity."( Effect of CYP3A-inducing anti-epileptics on sorafenib exposure: results of a phase II study of sorafenib plus daily temozolomide in adults with recurrent glioblastoma.
Bigner, DD; Desjardins, A; Friedman, AH; Friedman, HS; Gururangan, S; Herndon, JE; Janney, D; Marcello, J; McLendon, RE; Peters, K; Reardon, DA; Sampson, JH; Vredenburgh, JJ, 2011
)
0.37
" The originally approved temozolomide dosing regimen is 150 to 200 mg/m(2) per day (Days 1 to 5 every 28-day cycle [5 of 28 days])."( Dose-dense temozolomide regimens: antitumor activity, toxicity, and immunomodulatory effects.
Hwu, WJ; Neyns, B; Reardon, DA; Tosoni, A, 2010
)
0.36
" Metronomic dosing of temozolomide (TMZ) combined with standard radiotherapy may improve survival by increasing the therapeutic index and anti-angiogenic effect of TMZ."( A multi-centre Canadian pilot study of metronomic temozolomide combined with radiotherapy for newly diagnosed paediatric brainstem glioma.
Bartels, U; Baruchel, S; Bouffet, E; Eisenstat, D; Gammon, J; Huang, A; Hukin, J; Johnston, DL; Samson, Y; Sharp, JR; Stempak, D; Stephens, D; Tabori, U, 2010
)
0.36
"Chemoradiotherapy with metronomic dosing of TMZ showed similar toxicity to previous TMZ regimens, and does not appear to improve survival in paediatric DIBSG."( A multi-centre Canadian pilot study of metronomic temozolomide combined with radiotherapy for newly diagnosed paediatric brainstem glioma.
Bartels, U; Baruchel, S; Bouffet, E; Eisenstat, D; Gammon, J; Huang, A; Hukin, J; Johnston, DL; Samson, Y; Sharp, JR; Stempak, D; Stephens, D; Tabori, U, 2010
)
0.36
" Primary therapies were divided into four groups: radiotherapy alone, moderately dosed COPP/ABVD-like chemotherapies for intermediate and advanced stages and BEACOPP escalated."( Impact of first- and second-line treatment for Hodgkin's lymphoma on the incidence of AML/MDS and NHL--experience of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group analyzed by a parametric model of carcinogenesis.
Diehl, V; Engert, A; Franklin, J; Hasenclever, D; Josting, A; Loeffler, M; Scholz, M, 2011
)
0.37
" These combinations appear to be the most promising for in vivo pre-clinical studies, with a view to testing in melanoma patients as a continuous dosing strategy, due to the in vitro additive inhibitory effect on growth seen in both endothelial and cancer cells."( Sorafenib enhances the in vitro anti-endothelial effects of low dose (metronomic) chemotherapy.
Cawkwell, L; Little, SJ; Maraveyas, A; Murray, A; Stanley, P, 2010
)
0.36
" On the basis of these results, the recommended Phase II dosage currently being tested is RAD001 70 mg/week in combination with standard chemoradiotherapy."( North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase I trial N057K of everolimus (RAD001) and temozolomide in combination with radiation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme.
Brown, PD; Buckner, JC; Galanis, E; Giannini, C; Jaeckle, KA; McGraw, S; Peller, PJ; Sarkaria, JN; Uhm, JH; Wu, W, 2011
)
0.37
"After diagnostic surgery or biopsy, treatment with tipifarnib started 5 to 9 days before initiating radiotherapy, twice daily, in 4-week cycles using discontinuous dosing (21 out of 28 days), until toxicity or progression."( A phase I trial of tipifarnib with radiation therapy, with and without temozolomide, for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Abrey, L; Chang, SM; Cloughesy, TF; DeAngelis, LM; Demopoulos, A; Drappatz, J; Fine, HA; Fink, K; Kesari, S; Lamborn, KR; Lassman, AB; Lieberman, FS; Malkin, MG; Mehta, MP; Nghiemphu, PL; Prados, MD; Robins, HI; Torres-Trejo, A; Wen, PY, 2011
)
0.37
" All patients received TMZ at a dosage of 90 mg/m(2)/day for 42 days to a dose of 59."( Temozolomide in the treatment of children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.
Bouffet, E; Cohen, KJ; Heideman, RL; Holmes, EJ; Lavey, RS; Pollack, IF; Zhou, T, 2011
)
0.37
" We identified melanoma cell lines with different sensitivities to single versus prolonged clinical dosing regimens of temozolomide treatment and assessed a variety of potential resistance mechanisms using this model."( Temozolomide chemoresistance heterogeneity in melanoma with different treatment regimens: DNA damage accumulation contribution.
Boeckmann, L; Emmert, S; Kuschal, C; Nickel, AC; Schaefer, A; Schön, MP; Thomale, J; Thoms, KM, 2011
)
0.37
" Cediranib was dosed at 3 mg/kg daily five times a week orally for 2 weeks."( Cediranib enhances control of wild type EGFR and EGFRvIII-expressing gliomas through potentiating temozolomide, but not through radiosensitization: implications for the clinic.
Andersen, B; Dicker, AP; Lawrence, RY; Liu, Y; Wachsberger, PR; Xia, X, 2011
)
0.37
" We proposed a systematic classification scheme using FDA-approved drug labeling to assess the DILI potential of drugs, which yielded a benchmark dataset with 287 drugs representing a wide range of therapeutic categories and daily dosage amounts."( FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
Chen, M; Fang, H; Liu, Z; Shi, Q; Tong, W; Vijay, V, 2011
)
0.37
" In our case, TMZ administration, despite changing the TMZ dosing regimen to prompt a drug response, was incapable of depleting MGMT stores."( Aggressive silent corticotroph adenoma progressing to pituitary carcinoma: the role of temozolomide therapy.
Cusimano, M; Fadul, CE; Gonzalez, R; Horvath, E; Kovacs, K; Moshkin, O; Ortiz, LD; Rotondo, F; Scheithauer, BW; Syro, LV; Uribe, H,
)
0.13
"We conducted a phase I clinical trial of the combination of SCH 66336 with temozolomide administered on the standard 5-day dosing schedule."( A phase I trial of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor, SCH 66336, with temozolomide for patients with malignant glioma.
Coan, AD; Desjardins, A; Friedman, AH; Friedman, HS; Herndon, JE; Peters, KB; Reardon, DA; Threatt, S; Vredenburgh, JJ, 2011
)
0.37
" Additional trials are needed to better define the optimal dosing in such patients."( A phase I study of bortezomib and temozolomide in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Chow, W; Chung, V; Cristea, M; Frankel, P; Koehler, S; Leong, L; Lim, D; Martel, C; Morgan, R; Portnow, J; Reckamp, K; Shibata, S; Synold, TW; Twardowski, P, 2012
)
0.38
" The growing body of evidence demonstrating the clinical importance of O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) has generated a considerable interest in the exploration of strategies to overcome MGMT-mediated resistance to alkylating agents; for example protracted administration of Temozolomide (TMZ) may result in more extensive and sustained depletion of MGMT; for this reason a variety of dosing schedules that increase the duration of exposure and the cumulative dose of TMZ are being investigated for the treatment of patient with recurrent malignant glioma after standard treatment."( Rechallenge with temozolomide in recurrent glioma.
Botturi, A; Fariselli, L; Ferrari, D; Gaviani, P; Lamperti, E; Salmaggi, A; Silvani, A; Simonetti, G, 2011
)
0.37
" These may include TMZ concentrations in the brain parenchyma, TMZ dosing schemes, hypoxic microenvironments, niche factors, and the re-acquisition of stem cell properties by non-stem cells."( Chemoresistance of glioblastoma cancer stem cells--much more complex than expected.
Beier, CP; Beier, D; Schulz, JB, 2011
)
0.37
" Temozolomide, dosed according to MGMT methylation status, demonstrated modest clinical activity in elderly patients with AML, especially in those presenting with fewer comorbidities and low disease burden."( Tailored temozolomide therapy according to MGMT methylation status for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Arber, DA; Coutre, SE; Gotlib, J; Kohrt, HE; Medeiros, BC; Zehnder, JL; Zhang, B, 2012
)
0.38
"Seventy-one eligible patients 70 years of age or older with newly diagnosed GBM and a Karnofsky performance status ≥60 were treated with a short course of RT (40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks) plus TMZ at the dosage of 75 mg/m(2) per day followed by 12 cycles of adjuvant TMZ (150-200 mg/m(2) for 5 days during each 28-day cycle)."( Phase II study of short-course radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma.
Arcella, A; Caporello, P; De Sanctis, V; Enrici, RM; Giangaspero, F; Lanzetta, G; Minniti, G; Salvati, M; Scaringi, C, 2012
)
0.38
"A dosage of 10 mg everolimus daily with TMZ 150 mg/m(2)/day for five consecutive days every 28 days in patients is the recommended dose for this regimen."( A phase I study of temozolomide and everolimus (RAD001) in patients with newly diagnosed and progressive glioblastoma either receiving or not receiving enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants: an NCIC CTG study.
Easaw, J; Eisenhauer, E; Kavan, P; Lwin, Z; Macdonald, D; Macneil, M; Mason, WP; McIntosh, L; Thiessen, B; Urva, S, 2012
)
0.38
" Scheduling of docetaxel before selumetinib was more beneficial than when selumetinib was dosed before docetaxel and demonstrated a pro-apoptotic phenotype."( The MEK1/2 inhibitor, selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886), enhances anti-tumour efficacy when combined with conventional chemotherapeutic agents in human tumour xenograft models.
Alferez, D; Davies, BR; Heaton, SP; Heier, A; Holt, SV; Logié, A; Odedra, R; Smith, PD; Wilkinson, RW, 2012
)
0.38
" It could therefore be used as an important platform for better prediction of drug dosing and schedule towards personalized medicine."( Towards personalized medicine with a three-dimensional micro-scale perfusion-based two-chamber tissue model system.
Barker, J; Foltz, G; Honkakoski, P; Küblbeck, J; Li, W; Lin, B; Ma, L; Zhang, J; Zhou, C, 2012
)
0.38
" Moreover, this class of compounds possesses a generally favorable in vitro ADME profile, along with good exposure levels in plasma and brain following intraperitoneal dosing (30 mg/kg body weight) in mice."( Synthesis, biological evaluation, and structure-activity relationships of a novel class of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 inhibitors.
Dorjsuren, D; Jadhav, A; Maloney, DJ; Rai, G; Simeonov, A; Vyjayanti, VN; Wilson, DM, 2012
)
0.38
" These results suggest that GBMs with EGFR amplification are a heterogenous group of tumors and that behavior might differ according to the degree of amplification, although not in a straightforward dose-response manner."( Paradoxical relationship between the degree of EGFR amplification and outcome in glioblastomas.
Bortoluzzi, S; Cieply, K; Fardo, DW; Hamilton, RL; Hobbs, J; Horbinski, C; Nikiforova, MN, 2012
)
0.38
" However, the results were quite similar despite the different dosage used and the combination with dacarbazine in the first line treatment."( Immunomodulating antibodies in the treatment of metastatic melanoma: the experience with anti-CTLA-4, anti-CD137, and anti-PD1.
Ascierto, PA; Simeone, E,
)
0.13
"The effectiveness of temozolomide (TMZ) dosing schemes and the "rechallenge" of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with TMZ are controversial."( Efficacy of clinically relevant temozolomide dosing schemes in glioblastoma cancer stem cell lines.
Beier, CP; Beier, D; Brawanski, K; Hau, P; Schriefer, B; Schulz, JB; Weis, J, 2012
)
0.38
" Prospective pharmacokinetic studies to devise a rational dosing strategy for vinblastine in patients receiving ritonavir/lopinavir are warranted."( Incidence, predictors and significance of severe toxicity in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-associated Hodgkin lymphoma.
Boro, J; Cheung, MC; Ezzat, HM; Harris, M; Hicks, LK; Leitch, HA; Lima, VD; Montaner, JS, 2012
)
0.38
" These data reassuringly suggest that BEV does not significantly change the ECF tumor concentrations of TMZ in either tumor-bearing or normal brain when dosed 36 h prior to TMZ."( The impact of bevacizumab on temozolomide concentrations in intracranial U87 gliomas.
Blakeley, JO; Brastianos, H; Brem, H; Grossman, R; Rudek, MA; Tyler, B; Zadnik, P, 2012
)
0.38
" Dose-response and cellular growth assays indicate that erlotinib reduces cell proliferation in all tested cell lines without inducing cytotoxic effects."( EGFR inhibition in glioma cells modulates Rho signaling to inhibit cell motility and invasion and cooperates with temozolomide to reduce cell growth.
Fernández de Mattos, S; Ramis, G; Rodríguez, J; Thomàs-Moyà, E; Villalonga, P, 2012
)
0.38
" No DLTs were encountered, but vorinostat dosing could not be escalated further due to thrombocytopenia."( Phase I study of vorinostat in combination with temozolomide in patients with high-grade gliomas: North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study 04-03.
Ames, MM; Chang, SM; Cloughesy, TF; Desideri, S; Drappatz, J; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Gilbert, MR; Kuhn, JG; Lamborn, KR; Lassman, AB; Lee, EQ; Lieberman, FS; McGovern, RM; Prados, MD; Puduvalli, VK; Reid, JM; Robins, HI; Wen, PY; Xu, J; Ye, X; Yung, WK, 2012
)
0.38
" Treatment was well tolerated in all dosage groups."( Phase I-II study of radiopeptide 177Lu-octreotate in combination with capecitabine and temozolomide in advanced low-grade neuroendocrine tumors.
Claringbold, PG; Price, RA; Turner, JH, 2012
)
0.38
" It was designed to maximize cytoreduction via high dosing of synergistically interacting agents, while minimizing morbidity in patients with resistant neuroblastoma (NB) and ineligible for clinical trials due to myelosuppression from previous therapy."( 5-day/5-drug myeloablative outpatient regimen for resistant neuroblastoma.
Basu, EM; Cheung, NK; Kramer, K; Kushner, BH; Modak, S; Roberts, SS, 2013
)
0.39
" continuous dosing in combination with dacarbazine, 300 mg/m(2) for three consecutive days every 21 days until disease progression or intolerable toxicity."( Sorafenib and dacarbazine in soft tissue sarcoma: a single institution experience.
Dei Tos, AP; Del Vescovo, R; Frezza, AM; Santini, D; Schiavon, G; Silletta, M; Tonini, G; Vincenzi, B; Zobel, BB, 2013
)
0.39
" This regimen was based on our studies with carcinoid cell lines that showed synergistic cytotoxicity with sequence-specific dosing of 5-fluorouracil preceding temozolomide (TMZ)."( Capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) for metastatic, well-differentiated neuroendocrine cancers: The Pancreas Center at Columbia University experience.
Allendorf, J; Chabot, JA; Dinnen, RD; Fine, RL; Gulati, AP; Krantz, BA; Lee, JA; Mao, Y; Moss, RA; Mowatt, KB; Schreibman, S; Schrope, B; Sherman, WH; Stevens, PD; Tsushima, DA, 2013
)
0.39
" In a human GBM xenograft model, a single daily dosage of MB does not activate AMP-activated protein kinase signaling, and no tumor regression was observed."( Reversing the Warburg effect as a treatment for glioblastoma.
Bigner, DD; Choudhury, GR; Ghorpade, A; Keir, ST; Li, W; Liu, R; Poteet, E; Ryou, MG; Simpkins, JW; Tang, L; Wen, Y; Winters, A; Yan, H; Yang, SH; Yuan, F, 2013
)
0.39
" Sufficient information on steroid dosing was available in 72 patients included in the final analysis."( Steroid management in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Deangelis, LM; Deutsch, MB; Lassman, AB; Panageas, KS, 2013
)
0.39
"Temozolomide (TMZ) is important chemotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), but the optimal dosing schedule is unclear."( Efficacy of protracted temozolomide dosing is limited in MGMT unmethylated GBM xenograft models.
Anderson, SK; Ballman, KV; Carlson, BL; Cen, L; Decker, PA; Giannini, C; Grogan, PT; Kitange, GJ; Mladek, AC; Pokorny, JL; Sarkaria, JN; Schroeder, MA; Wu, W, 2013
)
0.39
"The efficacies of different clinically relevant dosing regimens were compared in a panel of 7 primary GBM xenografts in an intracranial therapy evaluation model."( Efficacy of protracted temozolomide dosing is limited in MGMT unmethylated GBM xenograft models.
Anderson, SK; Ballman, KV; Carlson, BL; Cen, L; Decker, PA; Giannini, C; Grogan, PT; Kitange, GJ; Mladek, AC; Pokorny, JL; Sarkaria, JN; Schroeder, MA; Wu, W, 2013
)
0.39
" There was no clear relationship between vorinostat dosage and drug exposure over the dose range studied."( A pediatric phase 1 trial of vorinostat and temozolomide in relapsed or refractory primary brain or spinal cord tumors: a Children's Oncology Group phase 1 consortium study.
Ahern, C; Ames, MM; Blaney, SM; Fouladi, M; Gilbertson, RJ; Horton, T; Hummel, TR; Ingle, AM; McGovern, RM; Reid, JM; Wagner, L; Weigel, B, 2013
)
0.39
"2mpk (equivalent to 10mpk of 1), 2 gave essentially the same exposure of 1 compared to dosing 10mpk of 1 itself."( Synthesis and evaluation of carbamoylmethylene linked prodrugs of BMS-582949, a clinical p38α inhibitor.
Barrish, JC; Dodd, JH; Everlof, G; Galella, MA; Gesenberg, C; Leftheris, K; Lin, J; Liu, C; Malley, M; Marathe, PH; McKinnon, M; Schieven, GL; Zhang, H, 2013
)
0.39
" Comparisons included no chemotherapy, non-temozolomide chemotherapy or different dosing schedules of temozolomide."( Temozolomide for high grade glioma.
Garside, R; Grant, R; Hart, MG; Rogers, G; Stein, K, 2013
)
0.39
" We report five patients who received long-term treatment with TMZ chemotherapy at normal dosing levels."( Long-term treatment with temozolomide in malignant glioma.
Defrates, SR; Lightner, DD; Mannas, JP; Pittman, T; Villano, JL, 2014
)
0.4
"Myelotoxicity during initial cycles of chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma is associated with better outcome, supporting the concept of individualised dosing based on pharmacodynamic end points to optimise results."( A study to investigate dose escalation of doxorubicin in ABVD chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma incorporating biomarkers of response and toxicity.
Dive, C; Gibb, A; Greystoke, A; Hampson, G; Illidge, T; Johnson, P; Linton, K; Lister, A; Neeson, S; Pettitt, A; Radford, J; Ranson, M; Smith, E, 2013
)
0.39
" Circulating cell death biomarkers may assist in the development of future individualised dosing strategies."( A study to investigate dose escalation of doxorubicin in ABVD chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma incorporating biomarkers of response and toxicity.
Dive, C; Gibb, A; Greystoke, A; Hampson, G; Illidge, T; Johnson, P; Linton, K; Lister, A; Neeson, S; Pettitt, A; Radford, J; Ranson, M; Smith, E, 2013
)
0.39
"Mutagenic and clastogenic effects of some DNA damaging agents such as methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) have been demonstrated to exhibit a nonlinear or even "thresholded" dose-response in vitro and in vivo."( Quantitative assessment of the dose-response of alkylating agents in DNA repair proficient and deficient ames tester strains.
Guérard, M; Tang, L; Zeller, A, 2014
)
0.4
" Overall, we have verified that TMZ in addition to being an alkylating and cytotoxic chemotherapy, also possess immune modulatory effect in MM patients treated with standard dosage of TMZ."( Immune modulations during chemoimmunotherapy & novel vaccine strategies--in metastatic melanoma and non small-cell lung cancer.
Iversen, TZ, 2013
)
0.39
" Patients aged over 70 years with favorable KPS, or patients aged 60-70 years with borderline KPS, should be considered for monotherapy utilizing standard TMZ dosing for patients with MGMT-methylated tumors, and hypofractionated RT (34 Gy in ten fractions or 40 Gy in 15 fractions) for patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors."( Treatment options and outcomes for glioblastoma in the elderly patient.
Arvold, ND; Reardon, DA, 2014
)
0.4
"Temozolomide, when dosed at 50, 25, 10, or 5 mg/kg, 5 days per week, beginning 3 days after inoculation, completely prevented the formation of experimental brain metastases from MGMT-negative 231-BR-EGFP cells."( Profound prevention of experimental brain metastases of breast cancer by temozolomide in an MGMT-dependent manner.
Biernat, W; Duchnowska, R; Gril, B; Hewitt, SM; Hua, E; Jassem, J; Liewehr, DJ; Palmieri, D; Qian, Y; Sosińska-Mielcarek, K; Stark, AM; Steeg, PS; Steinberg, SM; Woditschka, S, 2014
)
0.4
" The ECM algorithm for incomplete data is applied to estimating the dose-response relationship in the proposed model."( Modeling sustained treatment effects in tumor xenograft experiments.
Deng, D; Fang, HB; Tan, M; Zhang, T, 2014
)
0.4
" In vivo drug efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were analyzed using clinically relevant dosing regimens."( Discordant in vitro and in vivo chemopotentiating effects of the PARP inhibitor veliparib in temozolomide-sensitive versus -resistant glioblastoma multiforme xenografts.
Bakken, KK; Boakye-Agyeman, F; Carlson, BL; Gupta, SK; Kizilbash, SH; Mladek, AC; Reid, J; Sarkaria, JN; Schroeder, MA, 2014
)
0.4
"In vitro cytotoxicity assays do not adequately model the therapeutic index of PARP inhibitors, as concentrations of veliparib and TMZ required to sensitize TMZ-resistant cancer cells in vivo cannot be achieved using a tolerable dosing regimen."( Discordant in vitro and in vivo chemopotentiating effects of the PARP inhibitor veliparib in temozolomide-sensitive versus -resistant glioblastoma multiforme xenografts.
Bakken, KK; Boakye-Agyeman, F; Carlson, BL; Gupta, SK; Kizilbash, SH; Mladek, AC; Reid, J; Sarkaria, JN; Schroeder, MA, 2014
)
0.4
"The EORTC-NCIC regimen for glioblastoma requires different dosing of temozolomide (TMZ) during radiation and maintenance therapy."( Analyzing temozolomide medication errors: potentially fatal.
Bressler, LR; Gabay, MP; Letarte, N; Long, KE; Stachnik, JM; Villano, JL, 2014
)
0.4
" In phase II, participants were randomized (stratified by age and KPS) to receive A, T or AT; A was dosed at 40 mg/day and T at 75 mg/m(2) for 21 of 28 days."( Phase I/randomized phase II study of afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, with or without protracted temozolomide in adults with recurrent glioblastoma.
Cong, J; Cseh, A; Eisenstat, DD; Fu, Y; Kavan, P; Mason, WP; Mathieu, D; Nabors, LB; Perry, JR; Phuphanich, S; Reardon, DA; Shapiro, W; Wind, S, 2015
)
0.42
" We therefore evaluated a 5-day dosing schedule of temozolomide and examined MGMT as a predictive biomarker for temozolomide treatment in SCLC."( Trial of a 5-day dosing regimen of temozolomide in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancers with assessment of methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase.
Bergagnini, I; Drilon, A; Ginsberg, MS; Heguy, A; Holodny, AI; Huberman, K; Kadota, K; Kris, MG; Krug, LM; Pietanza, MC; Riely, GJ; Sima, CS; Sumner, DK; Travis, WD; Zauderer, MG, 2014
)
0.4
" Because tasisulam is highly albumin-bound, patients in the tumor-specific confirmation arms were dosed targeting specific albumin-corrected exposure ranges (AUCalb) identified during dose-escalation (3,500 h*μg/mL [75th percentile] for docetaxel, temozolomide, and cisplatin; 4,000 h*μg/mL for gemcitabine and erlotinib)."( An innovative, multi-arm, complete phase 1b study of the novel anti-cancer agent tasisulam in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Becerra, CR; Braiteh, F; Chen, J; Chow, KH; Conkling, PR; Garbo, L; Ilaria, R; Jotte, RM; Richards, DA; Robert-Vizcarrondo, F; Smith, DA; Stephenson, J; Tai, DF; Turner, PK; Von Hoff, DD, 2015
)
0.42
" Dose-response analysis of cultured GBM cells revealed that DP68 is more potent than DP86 and TMZ and that DP68 was effective even in cell lines resistant to TMZ."( Evaluation of novel imidazotetrazine analogues designed to overcome temozolomide resistance and glioblastoma regrowth.
Gynther, M; Mladek, AC; Phillips, RM; Ramirez, YP; Rautio, J; Ross, AH; Sakaria, JN; Wheelhouse, RT, 2015
)
0.42
" All patients received conformal WBRT (3 Gy × 10-30 Gy), with or without concomitant TMZ administered at a dosage of 75 mg/m(2)/day during the irradiation period."( Phase II randomized study of whole-brain radiation therapy with or without concurrent temozolomide for brain metastases from breast cancer.
Bourgier, C; Cao, KI; Gerber, S; Gobillion, A; Kirova, YM; Le Scodan, R; Lebas, N; Levy, C; Pierga, JY; Savignoni, A, 2015
)
0.42
" All patients received the first cycle of TMZ at a dosage of 150 mg/m(2) starting on the second or third postsurgical day."( Long-term therapy with temozolomide is a feasible option for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a single-institution experience with as many as 101 temozolomide cycles.
Albanese, V; Barbagallo, GM; Caltabiano, R; Certo, F; Lanzafame, S; Longo, A; Motta, F; Palmucci, S; Paratore, S; Parra, HS; Privitera, G; Scaglione, G, 2014
)
0.4
"01), and higher posttreatment dosing of corticosteroid (P=."( Standard (60 Gy) or short-course (40 Gy) irradiation plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for elderly patients with glioblastoma: a propensity-matched analysis.
Arcella, A; Bozzao, A; Enrici, RM; Esposito, V; Giangaspero, F; Lanzetta, G; Minniti, G; Pace, A; Scaringi, C; Terrenato, I, 2015
)
0.42
" Since TMZ is the most active cytotoxic agent against GBM, and the standard dosing of TMZ has shown favorable safety profile in clinical trials, re-challenge with TMZ in increased dose density schedules for recurrent tumors that have evaded from prior standard TMZ therapy appears to be a rational approach and has been intensively exploited."( Dose-dense temozolomide: is it still promising?
Nagane, M, 2015
)
0.42
" Even though dosing and timing might have been the reasons for this failure, it might also be that TREO does not reach the brain in sufficient amount."( Transport of treosulfan and temozolomide across an in-vitro blood-brain barrier model.
Hupert, M; Linz, U; Santiago-Schübel, B; Stab, J; Wagner, S; Wien, S, 2015
)
0.42
" The economic evaluation compared the costs and outcomes of ipilimumab by assuming that the 3 mg/kg dosing regimen was clinically equivalent in efficacy to an ipilimumab 10 mg/kg dosing regimen plus DTIC and by using a treatment sequencing approach that incorporated second-line active therapy and third-line best supportive care (BSC)."( Ipilimumab for Previously Untreated Unresectable Malignant Melanoma: A Critique of the Evidence.
Eastwood, A; Giannopoulou, C; McKenna, C; Moe-Byrne, T; Sideris, E; Wade, R, 2015
)
0.42
"8- and 21-fold, respectively, when similarly dosed in P-gp-deficient mice."( Brain Exposure of Two Selective Dual CDK4 and CDK6 Inhibitors and the Antitumor Activity of CDK4 and CDK6 Inhibition in Combination with Temozolomide in an Intracranial Glioblastoma Xenograft.
Ajamie, RT; De Dios, A; Gelbert, LM; Kulanthaivel, P; Raub, TJ; Sanchez-Martinez, C; Sawada, GA; Shannon, HE; Staton, BA; Wishart, GN, 2015
)
0.42
" We investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of iniparib with monthly (m) and continuous (c) temozolomide (TMZ) dosing schedules in patients with malignant gliomas (MG)."( Phase I study of iniparib concurrent with monthly or continuous temozolomide dosing schedules in patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas.
Blakeley, JO; Chi, AS; Desideri, S; Emmons, G; Garcia Ribas, I; Grossman, SA; Mikkelsen, T; Nabors, LB; Peereboom, D; Rosenfeld, MR; Supko, JG; Ye, X, 2015
)
0.42
"Midazolam causes a hormetic dose-response relationship in human neuroblastoma cells."( Pretreatment but not subsequent coincubation with midazolam reduces the cytotoxicity of temozolomide in neuroblastoma cells.
Bauer, I; Braun, S; Pannen, B; Werdehausen, R, 2015
)
0.42
" We confirmed in these studies that after completion of the Q7D×3 dosing of IrC™, but not IRN, the tumor-associated vascular was normalized as compared to untreated tumors."( Determination of an optimal dosing schedule for combining Irinophore C™ and temozolomide in an orthotopic model of glioblastoma.
Anantha, M; Backstrom, I; Bally, MB; Chu, F; Kalra, J; Masin, D; Strutt, D; Verreault, M; Walker, D; Waterhouse, D; Wehbe, M; Yapp, DT, 2015
)
0.42
" In comparing DNA damage signaling after dosing with veliparib/TMZ or TMZ alone, increased phosphorylation of damage-responsive proteins (KAP1, Chk1, Chk2, and H2AX) was observed only in MGMT promoter-hypermethylated lines."( Delineation of MGMT Hypermethylation as a Biomarker for Veliparib-Mediated Temozolomide-Sensitizing Therapy of Glioblastoma.
Bakken, KK; Ballman, KV; Boakye-Agyeman, F; Carlson, BL; Cen, L; Decker, PA; Eckel-Passow, JE; Gupta, SK; Jenkins, RB; Kitange, GJ; Kizilbash, SH; Mladek, AC; Pokorny, JL; Reid, JM; Sarkar, G; Sarkaria, JN; Schroeder, MA; Sulman, EP; Verhaak, RG, 2016
)
0.43
" This study provides strong scientific rationale for the development of an optimized dosing regimen for a PARP inhibitor with TMZ/IR for upfront treatment of GBM."( Evaluation of Concurrent Radiation, Temozolomide and ABT-888 Treatment Followed by Maintenance Therapy with Temozolomide and ABT-888 in a Genetically Engineered Glioblastoma Mouse Model.
Chenevert, TL; Galbán, CJ; Galbán, S; Heist, KA; Holland, EC; Lemasson, B; Li, Y; Rehemtulla, A; Ross, BD; Tsein, C; Wang, H; Zhu, Y, 2016
)
0.43
" Treatment of TMZ along with a sublethal dosage range of SU1498, a chemical inhibitor of the VEGF receptor signaling, induced significant cell death in both TMZ-sensitive and TMZ-resistant GBM cells without changing the status of the MGMT promoter methylation."( Combined inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling with temozolomide enhances cytotoxicity against human glioblastoma cells via downregulation of Neuropilin-1.
Choi, C; Choi, K; Kim, E; Lee, J; Ryu, SW, 2016
)
0.43
" So far, inhibition of angiogenesis by compounds such as bevacizumab, cediranib, enzastaurin or cilengitide as well as alternative dosing schedules of temozolomide did not prolong survival, neither at primary diagnosis nor at recurrent disease."( Pharmacotherapies for the treatment of glioblastoma - current evidence and perspectives.
Gramatzki, D; Roth, P; Seystahl, K; Weller, M, 2016
)
0.43
" According with the poor Performance Status (PS = 2) and to reduce the toxicity of the treatment was chosen an intermittent dosing regimen of metronomic temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)/day-one-week-on/on-week-off)."( Metronomic temozolomide as second line treatment for metastatic poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma.
Arcella, A; Ascierto, PA; Cicala, D; De Divitiis, C; Grimaldi, AM; Iaffaioli, RV; Romano, GM; Simeone, E; Tafuto, S; Tatangelo, F; von Arx, C, 2016
)
0.43
" In vivo, we implanted the cells orthotopically in nude mice and administered CBL0137 in various dosing regimens to assess brain and tumor accumulation of CBL0137, its effect on tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis, and on survival of mice with and without temozolomide (TMZ)."( Anticancer drug candidate CBL0137, which inhibits histone chaperone FACT, is efficacious in preclinical orthotopic models of temozolomide-responsive and -resistant glioblastoma.
Barone, TA; Burkhart, CA; Gudkov, AV; Gurova, KV; Haderski, G; Plunkett, RJ; Purmal, AA; Safina, A, 2017
)
0.46
" As a comparison group 33 patients with bevacizumab for at least 6 months continuously dosed at 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks were selected."( Impact of tapering and discontinuation of bevacizumab in patients with progressive glioblastoma.
Hertenstein, A; Hielscher, T; Menn, O; Platten, M; Wick, A; Wick, W; Wiestler, B; Winkler, F, 2016
)
0.43
" Dose-response curves were constructed using cell proliferation and sphere-forming assays."( The effects of tumor treating fields and temozolomide in MGMT expressing and non-expressing patient-derived glioblastoma cells.
Clark, PA; Deming, DA; Gaal, JT; Kuo, JS; Pasch, CA; Robins, HI; Strebe, JK, 2017
)
0.46
" Metronomic dosing of cytotoxic chemotherapy has emerged as a promising option to achieve this objective."( Phase I study of low-dose metronomic temozolomide for recurrent malignant gliomas.
Alsop, DC; Callahan, A; Giarusso, B; O'Loughlin, L; Timmons, J; Wong, ET, 2016
)
0.43
" As a part of the study, two DNA alkylating agents, methylnitrosourea (MNU) and temozolomide (TMZ), were dosed by single oral gavage at 25, 50, and 100mg/kg body weight."( Evaluation of the mutagenicity of alkylating agents, methylnitrosourea and temozolomide, using the rat Pig-a assay with total red blood cells or reticulocytes.
Ando, M; Inoue, Y; Iwase, Y; Kato, T; Muto, S; Uno, Y; Yamada, K, 2016
)
0.43
"6 μg/day) with negligible leakage into the peripheral blood (<100 ng) rendering ~1000 fold differential drug dosage in tumor versus peripheral blood."( Theranostic 3-Dimensional nano brain-implant for prolonged and localized treatment of recurrent glioma.
Ashokan, A; Gowd, GS; Junnuthula, VR; Koyakutty, M; Nair, SV; Panikar, D; Peethambaran, R; Ramachandran, R; Thomas, A; Thomas, J; Unni, AK, 2017
)
0.46
"Temozolomide (TMZ) for malignant gliomas is traditionally dosed in 5 out of a 28-day cycle, however alternative regimens exist, including dose-dense."( Long-term daily temozolomide with dose-dependent efficacy in MGMT promotor methylation negative recurrent high-grade astrocytoma.
Howard, TA; Villano, JL; Zhou, Z, 2017
)
0.46
" At recurrence, alternate dosing of temozolomide has shown to further deplete methyl-guanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) conferring added activity for patients who have progressed on the standard dosing regimen."( Phase II study of bi-weekly temozolomide plus bevacizumab for adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
Ahmadi, MM; Badruddoja, MA; Kuzma, K; Mahadevan, D; Norton, T; Pazzi, M; Sanan, A; Schroeder, K; Scully, T, 2017
)
0.46
" Modern techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton therapy allow for modifications in radiation dosing and delivery while improving conformality and limiting irradiation of normal tissue."( Fractionated Radiotherapy of Intracranial Gliomas.
Ghia, AJ, 2018
)
0.48
"8% of actual body weight calculated body surface area dosing was determined for concurrent phase temozolomide."( Actual body weight dosing of temozolomide and overall survival in patients with glioblastoma.
Chambers, C; Coppens, R; de Robles, P; Dersch-Mills, D; Folkman, F; Ghosh, S; Hsu, PYH; Leckie, C, 2021
)
0.62
"Temozolomide doses at full actual body weight calculated body surface area dosing during the concurrent phase is required to achieve a similar median OS as seen in the pivotal trial by Stupp et al."( Actual body weight dosing of temozolomide and overall survival in patients with glioblastoma.
Chambers, C; Coppens, R; de Robles, P; Dersch-Mills, D; Folkman, F; Ghosh, S; Hsu, PYH; Leckie, C, 2021
)
0.62
"To investigate the toxicity profile and establish an optimal dosing schedule of zotiraciclib with temozolomide in patients with recurrent high-grade astrocytoma."( Phase I Study of Zotiraciclib in Combination with Temozolomide for Patients with Recurrent High-grade Astrocytomas.
Aboud, O; Ahmad, S; Antony, R; Armstrong, TS; Boris, L; Bryla, C; Burton, EM; Butler, MK; Calvo, KR; Cordova, C; Figg, WD; Fink, D; Gallin, JI; Garren, N; Gilbert, MR; Gonzales, J; Grajkowska, E; Kuhns, DB; Leeper, H; Lindsley, M; Lollo, N; Long Priel, DA; Mendoza, TR; Mentges, K; Pang, Y; Peer, CJ; Penas-Prado, M; Siegel, C; Sissung, TM; Su, YT; Theeler, BJ; Vera, E; Wu, J; Yu, G; Yuan, Y, 2021
)
0.62
" Once validated, polymorphisms predicting drug metabolism may allow personalized dosing of zotiraciclib."( Phase I Study of Zotiraciclib in Combination with Temozolomide for Patients with Recurrent High-grade Astrocytomas.
Aboud, O; Ahmad, S; Antony, R; Armstrong, TS; Boris, L; Bryla, C; Burton, EM; Butler, MK; Calvo, KR; Cordova, C; Figg, WD; Fink, D; Gallin, JI; Garren, N; Gilbert, MR; Gonzales, J; Grajkowska, E; Kuhns, DB; Leeper, H; Lindsley, M; Lollo, N; Long Priel, DA; Mendoza, TR; Mentges, K; Pang, Y; Peer, CJ; Penas-Prado, M; Siegel, C; Sissung, TM; Su, YT; Theeler, BJ; Vera, E; Wu, J; Yu, G; Yuan, Y, 2021
)
0.62
" Cardiac and carotid radiation doses and chemotherapy exposure were combined with established dose-response relationships and population-based mortality and incidence rates."( Predicted Risks of Cardiovascular Disease Following Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in the UK NCRI RAPID Trial of Positron Emission Tomography-Directed Therapy for Early-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Buckle, A; Clifton-Hadley, L; Cutter, DJ; Darby, SC; Diez, P; Hoskin, PJ; Illidge, T; Ntentas, G; Popova, B; Radford, J; Ramroth, J, 2021
)
0.62
" There is insufficient data to make a recommendation about which alternative TMZ dosing provides the best benefits."( Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of cytotoxic chemotherapy and other cytotoxic therapies in the management of progressive glioblastoma in adults.
Germano, IM; Olson, JJ; Ormond, DR; Wen, P; Ziu, M, 2022
)
0.72
"This retrospective, observational study included adults with stage III/IV cHL initiating 1L doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD), brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine, or an escalated dosing regimen of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone within the US Oncology Network between January 2017 and October 2019."( Real-World Use of Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography and Reported Deauville Scores in Advanced-Stage Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Community Oncology Practice Perspective.
Beeks, A; Fanale, M; He, D; Liu, N; Robert, N; Yasenchak, C; Yu, KS, 2023
)
0.91
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (4)

RoleDescription
antineoplastic agentA substance that inhibits or prevents the proliferation of neoplasms.
alkylating agentHighly reactive chemical that introduces alkyl radicals into biologically active molecules and thereby prevents their proper functioning. It could be used as an antineoplastic agent, but it might be very toxic, with carcinogenic, mutagenic, teratogenic, and immunosuppressant actions. It could also be used as a component of poison gases.
prodrugA compound that, on administration, must undergo chemical conversion by metabolic processes before becoming the pharmacologically active drug for which it is a prodrug.
carcinogenic agentA role played by a chemical compound which is known to induce a process of carcinogenesis by corrupting normal cellular pathways, leading to the acquistion of tumoral capabilities.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (4)

ClassDescription
dacarbazineA monocarboxylic acid amide that is 1H-imidazole-4-carboxamide which is substituted at position 5 by a 3,3-dimethyltriaz-1-en-1-yl group. It is used for the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma, and in combination with other drugs for the treatment of Hodgkin's disease and soft-tissue sarcoma.
monocarboxylic acid amideA carboxamide derived from a monocarboxylic acid.
imidazolesA five-membered organic heterocycle containing two nitrogen atoms at positions 1 and 3, or any of its derivatives; compounds containing an imidazole skeleton.
triazene derivativeA nitrogen molecular entity resulting from the formal substitution of one or more of the hydrogens of triazene.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (35)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, 2-oxoglutarate OxygenaseHomo sapiens (human)Potency35.48130.177814.390939.8107AID2147
interleukin 8Homo sapiens (human)Potency74.97800.047349.480674.9780AID651758
hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha subunitHomo sapiens (human)Potency4.25273.189029.884159.4836AID1224846
RAR-related orphan receptor gammaMus musculus (house mouse)Potency13.33320.006038.004119,952.5996AID1159521
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency37.00880.000221.22318,912.5098AID1259243; AID1259247; AID743042; AID743054
aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1Homo sapiens (human)Potency16.81590.011212.4002100.0000AID1030
thyroid stimulating hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency39.81070.001318.074339.8107AID926; AID938
glucocorticoid receptor [Homo sapiens]Homo sapiens (human)Potency9.27800.000214.376460.0339AID720691; AID720692
retinoic acid nuclear receptor alpha variant 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency36.84250.003041.611522,387.1992AID1159552; AID1159553; AID1159555
estrogen-related nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency43.64790.001530.607315,848.9004AID1224848; AID1224849; AID1259403
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency44.66840.000229.305416,493.5996AID588513
cytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)Potency21.87610.00108.379861.1304AID1645840
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)Potency44.27740.001019.414170.9645AID743191
thyroid stimulating hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency37.57800.001628.015177.1139AID1259385
activating transcription factor 6Homo sapiens (human)Potency22.19120.143427.612159.8106AID1159516
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency16.78890.004611.374133.4983AID624296
survival motor neuron protein isoform dHomo sapiens (human)Potency9.44950.125912.234435.4813AID1458
lamin isoform A-delta10Homo sapiens (human)Potency11.22020.891312.067628.1838AID1487
Inositol monophosphatase 1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000010.475628.1838AID1457
Chain A, Beta-lactamaseEscherichia coli K-12Potency6.30960.044717.8581100.0000AID485294
glp-1 receptor, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency10.00000.01846.806014.1254AID624417
Fumarate hydrataseHomo sapiens (human)Potency37.22120.00308.794948.0869AID1347053
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency18.65480.001310.157742.8575AID1259252; AID1259253
polyproteinZika virusPotency37.22120.00308.794948.0869AID1347053
IDH1Homo sapiens (human)Potency8.19950.005210.865235.4813AID686970
urokinase-type plasminogen activator precursorMus musculus (house mouse)Potency6.30960.15855.287912.5893AID540303
plasminogen precursorMus musculus (house mouse)Potency6.30960.15855.287912.5893AID540303
urokinase plasminogen activator surface receptor precursorMus musculus (house mouse)Potency6.30960.15855.287912.5893AID540303
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.08200.004611.374133.4983AID624297
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)566.50000.11007.190310.0000AID1449628; AID1473738
Matrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.55600.00000.705310.0000AID625178
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
PAX8Homo sapiens (human)AC505.34000.04885.435469.1700AID687027
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (71)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
skeletal system developmentMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein phosphorylationMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
proteolysisMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
embryo implantationMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
cell migrationMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix disassemblyMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
macrophage differentiationMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
collagen catabolic processMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to reactive oxygen speciesMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
endodermal cell differentiationMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA bindingMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathwayMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
ephrin receptor signaling pathwayMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of keratinocyte migrationMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lipopolysaccharideMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cadmium ionMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-AMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of neuroinflammatory responseMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of receptor bindingMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
response to amyloid-betaMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular associated smooth muscle cell proliferationMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of epithelial cell differentiation involved in kidney developmentMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cation channel activityMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic signaling pathwayMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix organizationMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (32)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
metalloendopeptidase activityMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
serine-type endopeptidase activityMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
collagen bindingMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
peptidase activityMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
metallopeptidase activityMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (22)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
collagen-containing extracellular matrixMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
tertiary granule lumenMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumenMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceMatrix metalloproteinase-9Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (257)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1224817Assays to identify small molecules inhibitory for eIF4E expression2015Chemistry & biology, Jul-23, Volume: 22, Issue:7
Internal Ribosome Entry Site-Based Bicistronic In Situ Reporter Assays for Discovery of Transcription-Targeted Lead Compounds.
AID1764138Cytotoxicity against human HaCaT cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 48 hrs relative to control2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-01, Volume: 47l-Hypaphorine and d-hypaphorine: Specific antiacetylcholinesterase activity in rat brain tissue.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1132405Toxicity in mouse B16 cells allografted mouse at 216 mg/kg, ip qd for 9 days1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 21, Issue:3
Synthesis and antitumor activity of halogen-substituted 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)quinolines.
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID1455302Antitumor activity against mouse B16 cells implanted in nude mouse assessed as inhibition of tumor growth at 15 mg/kg, iv administered every other day for 20 days relative to control2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-08, Volume: 61, Issue:5
Glutathione S-Transferase π-Activatable O
AID1147881Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in BDF1 mouse assessed as increase in survival at 125 mg/kg administered on day 1 followed by 5 injections with 1 day interval relative to control1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Synthesis and antileukemic activities of furanyl, pyranyl, and ribosyl derivatives of 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide and 3-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.
AID977599Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B1-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID116629Percent increase in life span of TLX/5 lymphoma bearing mice at dose of 200 mg/kg1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Tumor inhibitory triazenes. 2. Variation of antitumor activity within an homologous series.
AID1869916Toxicity in BALB/c mouse assessed as change in body weight at 70 mg/kg, iv measured once every two days for 7 days
AID457505Cytotoxicity against human fibroblasts after 48 hrs by SRB assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 18, Issue:2
Synthesis, in vitro structure-activity relationship, and in vivo studies of 2-arylthiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid amides as anticancer agents.
AID1132406Toxicity in mouse B16 cells allografted mouse at 130 mg/kg, ip qd for 9 days1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 21, Issue:3
Synthesis and antitumor activity of halogen-substituted 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)quinolines.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID409952Inhibition of human brain MAOB2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and complex network approach to monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID526640Toxicity in mouse B16-F1 cells xenografted C57/BL mouse assessed as reduction of body weight at 60 mg/kg, ip administered 7 days after tumor inoculation qd for 14 days2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-28, Volume: 53, Issue:20
Discovery of novel 2-aryl-4-benzoyl-imidazoles targeting the colchicines binding site in tubulin as potential anticancer agents.
AID477295Octanol-water partition coefficient, log P of the compound2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 45, Issue:4
QSPR modeling of octanol/water partition coefficient of antineoplastic agents by balance of correlations.
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID1148443Toxicity in CDF1 mouse assessed as concentration required for producing T/C of 1401978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 21, Issue:6
Antitumor 1-(X-aryl)-3,3-dialkyltriazenes. 2. On the role of correlation analysis in decision making in drug modification. Toxicity quantitative structure-activity relationships of 1-(X-phenyl)-3,3-dialkyltriazenes in mice.
AID116626Percent increase in life span of TLX/5 lymphoma bearing mice at dose of 12.5 mg/kg1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Tumor inhibitory triazenes. 2. Variation of antitumor activity within an homologous series.
AID1147898Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted BDF1 mouse assessed as reduction in body weight at 120 mg/kg administered on day 1 followed by 5 injections with 1 day interval1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Synthesis and antileukemic activities of furanyl, pyranyl, and ribosyl derivatives of 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide and 3-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.
AID1147865Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in BDF1 mouse assessed as survival at 180 mg/kg administered on day 1 followed by 5 injections with 1 day interval1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Synthesis and antileukemic activities of furanyl, pyranyl, and ribosyl derivatives of 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide and 3-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.
AID977602Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B3-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID1147866Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in BDF1 mouse assessed as survival at 125 mg/kg administered on day 1 followed by 5 injections with 1 day interval1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Synthesis and antileukemic activities of furanyl, pyranyl, and ribosyl derivatives of 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide and 3-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.
AID1147883Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in BDF1 mouse assessed as increase in survival at 80 mg/kg administered on day 1 followed by 5 injections with 1 day interval relative to control1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Synthesis and antileukemic activities of furanyl, pyranyl, and ribosyl derivatives of 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide and 3-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID588220Literature-mined public compounds from Kruhlak et al phospholipidosis modelling dataset2008Toxicology mechanisms and methods, , Volume: 18, Issue:2-3
Development of a phospholipidosis database and predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models.
AID1147884Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in BDF1 mouse assessed as increase in survival at 53 mg/kg administered on day 1 followed by 5 injections with 1 day interval relative to control1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Synthesis and antileukemic activities of furanyl, pyranyl, and ribosyl derivatives of 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide and 3-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.
AID1869924Antitumor activity against human A-375 cells implanted in BALB/c mouse assessed as shrinkage of tumor tissue at 70 mg/kg, ip measured once every two days for 14 days
AID409950Inhibition of human brain MAOA2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and complex network approach to monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
AID550850Cytotoxicity against human OVCAR3 cells after 6 days by MTT assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 19, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of N-acetyl-S-(p-chlorophenylcarbamoyl)cysteine and its analogs as a novel class of anticancer agents.
AID1449628Inhibition of human BSEP expressed in baculovirus transfected fall armyworm Sf21 cell membranes vesicles assessed as reduction in ATP-dependent [3H]-taurocholate transport into vesicles incubated for 5 mins by Topcount based rapid filtration method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Dec, Volume: 40, Issue:12
Mitigating the inhibition of human bile salt export pump by drugs: opportunities provided by physicochemical property modulation, in silico modeling, and structural modification.
AID409947Inhibition of human recombinant MAOB at 1 mM by fluorimetric method2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and complex network approach to monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
AID132734Percent increase in life span was measured in B6d2F1 mice after implanting B16 melanoma cells(ic) at an intracerebral (ic) optimal dose of 10-40 mg/ (kg day)1984Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 27, Issue:12
1-Aryl-3,3-dimethyltriazenes: potential central nervous system active analogues of 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide (DTIC).
AID1132404Toxicity in mouse B16 cells allografted mouse at 360 mg/kg, ip qd for 9 days1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 21, Issue:3
Synthesis and antitumor activity of halogen-substituted 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)quinolines.
AID457503Antiproliferative activity against human A375 cells after 48 hrs by SRB assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 18, Issue:2
Synthesis, in vitro structure-activity relationship, and in vivo studies of 2-arylthiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid amides as anticancer agents.
AID678714Inhibition of human CYP2C19 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 3-butyryl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID404382Antiproliferative activity against fibroblast cells after 48 hrs by SRB assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-01, Volume: 18, Issue:11
Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of imidazole and imidazoline analogs for melanoma.
AID550851Cytotoxicity against human SK-MEL-2 cells after 6 days by MTT assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 19, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of N-acetyl-S-(p-chlorophenylcarbamoyl)cysteine and its analogs as a novel class of anticancer agents.
AID588209Literature-mined public compounds from Greene et al multi-species hepatotoxicity modelling dataset2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jul-19, Volume: 23, Issue:7
Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
AID1148442Toxicity in mouse assessed as concentration required for producing T/C of 1401978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 21, Issue:6
Antitumor 1-(X-aryl)-3,3-dialkyltriazenes. 2. On the role of correlation analysis in decision making in drug modification. Toxicity quantitative structure-activity relationships of 1-(X-phenyl)-3,3-dialkyltriazenes in mice.
AID1132417Antitumor activity against mouse B16 cells allografted mouse assessed as host survival at 360 mg/kg, ip qd for 9 days relative to control1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 21, Issue:3
Synthesis and antitumor activity of halogen-substituted 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)quinolines.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1132394Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted mouse assessed as host survival at 100 mg/kg, ip qd for 9 days relative to control1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 21, Issue:3
Synthesis and antitumor activity of halogen-substituted 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)quinolines.
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID40577Effect of compound on the survival time of mice bearing the B16 melanoma at a daily dose of 150 mg/kg1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 29, Issue:9
Synthesis and evaluation of 1-(arylsulfonyl)-2-[(methoxycarbonyl)sulfenyl]-1-methylhydrazines++ + as antineoplastic agents.
AID1147868Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in BDF1 mouse assessed as survival at 53 mg/kg administered on day 1 followed by 5 injections with 1 day interval1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Synthesis and antileukemic activities of furanyl, pyranyl, and ribosyl derivatives of 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide and 3-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID1132381Antitumor activity against mouse P388 cells allografted mouse assessed as host survival at 100 mg/kg, ip qd for 9 days relative to control1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 21, Issue:3
Synthesis and antitumor activity of halogen-substituted 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)quinolines.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID625276FDA Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base Benchmark Dataset (LTKB-BD) drugs of most concern for DILI2011Drug discovery today, Aug, Volume: 16, Issue:15-16
FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID1764137Cytotoxicity against human HaCaT cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 24 hrs relative to control2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-01, Volume: 47l-Hypaphorine and d-hypaphorine: Specific antiacetylcholinesterase activity in rat brain tissue.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1123539Mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium strain TA92 assessed as number of bacterial revertants after 2 days by Ames test in presence of rat liver S9 fraction1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 22, Issue:5
Ames test of 1-(X-phenyl)-3,3-dialkyltriazenes. A quantitative structure-activity study.
AID116635Percent increase in life span of TLX/5 lymphoma bearing mice at dose of 50 mg/kg1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Tumor inhibitory triazenes. 2. Variation of antitumor activity within an homologous series.
AID1636357Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 300 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NA2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID1147897Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted BDF1 mouse assessed as reduction in body weight at 125 mg/kg administered on day 1 followed by 5 injections with 1 day interval1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Synthesis and antileukemic activities of furanyl, pyranyl, and ribosyl derivatives of 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide and 3-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID73186In vitro cytotoxicity against human lymphoblastoid cell (GM892 A)1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-28, Volume: 38, Issue:9
Antitumor imidazotetrazines. 32. Synthesis of novel imidazotetrazinones and related bicyclic heterocycles to probe the mode of action of the antitumor drug temozolomide.
AID404381Antiproliferative activity against mouse B16-F1 cells after 48 hrs by SRB assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-01, Volume: 18, Issue:11
Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of imidazole and imidazoline analogs for melanoma.
AID678713Inhibition of human CYP2C9 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-methoxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin-3-acetic acid as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID665020Cytotoxicity against human A375 cells after 48 hrs by MTT assay2012European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 53Synthesis of new 2-galactosylthiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid amides. Antitumor evaluation against melanoma and breast cancer cells.
AID1132418Antitumor activity against mouse B16 cells allografted mouse assessed as host survival at 216 mg/kg, ip qd for 9 days relative to control1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 21, Issue:3
Synthesis and antitumor activity of halogen-substituted 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)quinolines.
AID1132823Distribution coefficient, log P of the compound1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 21, Issue:6
Antitumor 1-(X-aryl)-3,3-dialkyltriazenes. 1. Quantitative structure-activity relationships vs. L1210 leukemia in mice.
AID1636440Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2D6-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 300 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NA2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID1181988Cytotoxicity against human HeLa cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 24 to 48 hrs by MTT assay2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 24, Issue:15
New benzothieno[3,2-d]-1,2,3-triazines with antiproliferative activity: synthesis, spectroscopic studies, and biological activity.
AID457502Antiproliferative activity against mouse B16-F1 cells after 48 hrs by SRB assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 18, Issue:2
Synthesis, in vitro structure-activity relationship, and in vivo studies of 2-arylthiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid amides as anticancer agents.
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID678712Inhibition of human CYP1A2 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using ethoxyresorufin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID134111Mean life extension in mice bearing Trypanosoma rhodesiense, after ip administration at a dose of 0.2 mmol/kg1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 33, Issue:2
Methylating agents as trypanocides.
AID678722Covalent binding affinity to human liver microsomes assessed per mg of protein at 10 uM after 60 mins presence of NADPH2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1636495Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2C9-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 258.5 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of 2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID1147880Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in BDF1 mouse assessed as increase in survival at 180 mg/kg administered on day 1 followed by 5 injections with 1 day interval relative to control1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Synthesis and antileukemic activities of furanyl, pyranyl, and ribosyl derivatives of 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide and 3-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.
AID1147899Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted BDF1 mouse assessed as reduction in body weight at 80 mg/kg administered on day 1 followed by 5 injections with 1 day interval1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Synthesis and antileukemic activities of furanyl, pyranyl, and ribosyl derivatives of 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide and 3-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.
AID588210Human drug-induced liver injury (DILI) modelling dataset from Ekins et al2010Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Dec, Volume: 38, Issue:12
A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.
AID116624Percent increase in life span of TLX/5 lymphoma bearing mice at dose of 100 mg/kg1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Tumor inhibitory triazenes. 2. Variation of antitumor activity within an homologous series.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID132179Maximum increase in life span was measured in B6d2F1 mice after implanting murine leukemia L1210 cells(ic, 10e4 cells) at an intracerebral optimal dose of 160 mg/ (kg day)(qd 1-9)1984Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 27, Issue:12
1-Aryl-3,3-dimethyltriazenes: potential central nervous system active analogues of 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide (DTIC).
AID678718Metabolic stability in human liver microsomes assessed as high signal/noise ratio (S/N of >100) by measuring GSH adduct formation at 100 uM after 90 mins by HPLC-MS analysis2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID526641Toxicity in mouse B16-F1 cells xenografted C57/BL mouse assessed as reduction of body weight at 30 mg/kg, ip administered 7 days after tumor inoculation qd for 14 days2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-28, Volume: 53, Issue:20
Discovery of novel 2-aryl-4-benzoyl-imidazoles targeting the colchicines binding site in tubulin as potential anticancer agents.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID134249Mean life extension in mice bearing Trypanosoma rhodesiense, after ip administration at 0.5 mmol/kg dose1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 33, Issue:2
Methylating agents as trypanocides.
AID1147867Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in BDF1 mouse assessed as survival at 80 mg/kg administered on day 1 followed by 5 injections with 1 day interval1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Synthesis and antileukemic activities of furanyl, pyranyl, and ribosyl derivatives of 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide and 3-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.
AID37924Effect of compound on the body weight of mice bearing the B16 melanoma at a daily dose of 12.5 mg/kg1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 29, Issue:9
Synthesis and evaluation of 1-(arylsulfonyl)-2-[(methoxycarbonyl)sulfenyl]-1-methylhydrazines++ + as antineoplastic agents.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1869921Antitumor activity against human A-375 cells implanted in BALB/c mouse assessed as reduction in tumor weight at 70 mg/kg, ip measured once every two days for 14 days
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID1147882Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in BDF1 mouse assessed as increase in survival at 120 mg/kg administered on day 1 followed by 5 injections with 1 day interval relative to control1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Synthesis and antileukemic activities of furanyl, pyranyl, and ribosyl derivatives of 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide and 3-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID526637Antitumor activity against mouse B16-F1 cells xenografted in C57/BL mouse assessed as reduction of tumor growth at 60 mg/kg, ip administered 7 days after tumor inoculation qd for 14 days2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-28, Volume: 53, Issue:20
Discovery of novel 2-aryl-4-benzoyl-imidazoles targeting the colchicines binding site in tubulin as potential anticancer agents.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1147896Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted BDF1 mouse assessed as reduction in body weight at 180 mg/kg administered on day 1 followed by 5 injections with 1 day interval1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Synthesis and antileukemic activities of furanyl, pyranyl, and ribosyl derivatives of 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide and 3-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID116630Percent increase in life span of TLX/5 lymphoma bearing mice at dose of 25 mg/kg1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Tumor inhibitory triazenes. 2. Variation of antitumor activity within an homologous series.
AID678716Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using diethoxyfluorescein as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID1132822Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in mouse assessed as increase of host lifespan1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 21, Issue:6
Antitumor 1-(X-aryl)-3,3-dialkyltriazenes. 1. Quantitative structure-activity relationships vs. L1210 leukemia in mice.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1132419Antitumor activity against mouse B16 cells allografted mouse assessed as host survival at 130 mg/kg, ip qd for 9 days relative to control1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 21, Issue:3
Synthesis and antitumor activity of halogen-substituted 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)quinolines.
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID37923Effect of compound on the body weight of mice bearing the B16 melanoma at a daily dose of 100 mg/kg1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 29, Issue:9
Synthesis and evaluation of 1-(arylsulfonyl)-2-[(methoxycarbonyl)sulfenyl]-1-methylhydrazines++ + as antineoplastic agents.
AID19219Partition coefficient (logP)1984Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 27, Issue:12
1-Aryl-3,3-dimethyltriazenes: potential central nervous system active analogues of 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide (DTIC).
AID40574Effect of compound on the survival time of mice bearing the B16 melanoma at a daily dose (mg/kg) of,501986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 29, Issue:9
Synthesis and evaluation of 1-(arylsulfonyl)-2-[(methoxycarbonyl)sulfenyl]-1-methylhydrazines++ + as antineoplastic agents.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID38043Effect of compound on the body weight of mice bearing the B16 melanoma at a daily dose of 150 mg/kg1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 29, Issue:9
Synthesis and evaluation of 1-(arylsulfonyl)-2-[(methoxycarbonyl)sulfenyl]-1-methylhydrazines++ + as antineoplastic agents.
AID299636Antiproliferative activity against human SK-MEL-188 cells after 48 hrs by SRB assay2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 17, Issue:15
Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of thiazolidine analogs for melanoma.
AID1147900Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted BDF1 mouse assessed as reduction in body weight at 53 mg/kg administered on day 1 followed by 5 injections with 1 day interval1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Synthesis and antileukemic activities of furanyl, pyranyl, and ribosyl derivatives of 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-5-carboxamide and 3-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)pyrazole-4-carboxamide.
AID231797Ratio of cytotoxicity against Raji cells to that of GM892 A cells.1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-28, Volume: 38, Issue:9
Antitumor imidazotetrazines. 32. Synthesis of novel imidazotetrazinones and related bicyclic heterocycles to probe the mode of action of the antitumor drug temozolomide.
AID1869918Antitumor activity against human A-375 cells implanted in BALB/c mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 70 mg/kg, ip measured once every two days for 14 days
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID40575Effect of compound on the survival time of mice bearing the B16 melanoma at a daily dose of 100 mg/kg1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 29, Issue:9
Synthesis and evaluation of 1-(arylsulfonyl)-2-[(methoxycarbonyl)sulfenyl]-1-methylhydrazines++ + as antineoplastic agents.
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID678715Inhibition of human CYP2D6 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 4-methylaminoethyl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID409949Inhibition of human liver MAOA2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and complex network approach to monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
AID550849Cytotoxicity against human GC3/C1 cells after 6 days by MTT assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 19, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of N-acetyl-S-(p-chlorophenylcarbamoyl)cysteine and its analogs as a novel class of anticancer agents.
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID404380Antiproliferative activity against human A375 cells after 48 hrs by SRB assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-01, Volume: 18, Issue:11
Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of imidazole and imidazoline analogs for melanoma.
AID132184Maximum increase in life span was measured in B6d2F1 mice after implanting murine leukemia L1210 cells(ip, 10e5 cells) at an intraperitoneal optimal dose of 108 mg/ (kg day)(qd 1-9)1984Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 27, Issue:12
1-Aryl-3,3-dimethyltriazenes: potential central nervous system active analogues of 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide (DTIC).
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID457504Antiproliferative activity against human WM164 cells after 48 hrs by SRB assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 18, Issue:2
Synthesis, in vitro structure-activity relationship, and in vivo studies of 2-arylthiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid amides as anticancer agents.
AID526639Toxicity in mouse B16-F1 cells xenografted C57/BL mouse assessed as reduction of body weight at 10 mg/kg, ip administered 7 days after tumor inoculation qd for 14 days2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-28, Volume: 53, Issue:20
Discovery of novel 2-aryl-4-benzoyl-imidazoles targeting the colchicines binding site in tubulin as potential anticancer agents.
AID1132421Binding affinity to synthetic melanin at 5.8 mg/100 mL after 15 mins by UV-spectroscopic analysis1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 21, Issue:3
Synthesis and antitumor activity of halogen-substituted 4-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)quinolines.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID132738Percent increase in life span was measured in B6d2F1 mice after implanting murine leukemia Ependymoblastoma cells(ic) at an oral optimal dose of 64 mg/ (kg injection)1984Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 27, Issue:12
1-Aryl-3,3-dimethyltriazenes: potential central nervous system active analogues of 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide (DTIC).
AID116633Percent increase in life span of TLX/5 lymphoma bearing mice at dose of 400 mg/kg1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Tumor inhibitory triazenes. 2. Variation of antitumor activity within an homologous series.
AID550848Cytotoxicity against human UACC62 cells after 6 days by MTT assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 19, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of N-acetyl-S-(p-chlorophenylcarbamoyl)cysteine and its analogs as a novel class of anticancer agents.
AID678717Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-benzyloxyquinoline as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1132826Octanol-saturated water partition coefficient, log D of the compound1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 21, Issue:6
Antitumor 1-(X-aryl)-3,3-dialkyltriazenes. 1. Quantitative structure-activity relationships vs. L1210 leukemia in mice.
AID299637Antiproliferative activity against human WM164 cells after 48 hrs by SRB assay2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 17, Issue:15
Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of thiazolidine analogs for melanoma.
AID165776In vitro cytotoxicity against Raji cell line1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-28, Volume: 38, Issue:9
Antitumor imidazotetrazines. 32. Synthesis of novel imidazotetrazinones and related bicyclic heterocycles to probe the mode of action of the antitumor drug temozolomide.
AID299638Antiproliferative activity against human fibroblasts after 48 hrs by SRB assay2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 17, Issue:15
Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of thiazolidine analogs for melanoma.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347140qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347116qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347139qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347112qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347122qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347111qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347129qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347114qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347136qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347126qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347110qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for A673 cells)2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347123qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347115qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347118qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347127qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347119qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347117qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347141qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347137qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for Daoy cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347125qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347128qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347124qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347135qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347138qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D caspase screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347121qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347113qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347109qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1159550Human Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) Inhibitor Screening2015Nature cell biology, Nov, Volume: 17, Issue:11
6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase links oxidative PPP, lipogenesis and tumour growth by inhibiting LKB1-AMPK signalling.
AID1802950ICL Enzyme Assay from Article 10.3109/14756360903425221: \\5-Nitro-2,6-dioxohexahydro-4-pyrimidinecarboxamides: synthesis, in vitro antimycobacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and isocitrate lyase inhibition studies.\\2010Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 25, Issue:6
5-Nitro-2,6-dioxohexahydro-4-pyrimidinecarboxamides: synthesis, in vitro antimycobacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and isocitrate lyase inhibition studies.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID540299A screen for compounds that inhibit the MenB enzyme of Mycobacterium tuberculosis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 20, Issue:21
Synthesis and SAR studies of 1,4-benzoxazine MenB inhibitors: novel antibacterial agents against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
AID588519A screen for compounds that inhibit viral RNA polymerase binding and polymerization activities2011Antiviral research, Sep, Volume: 91, Issue:3
High-throughput screening identification of poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (7,211)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-1990916 (12.70)18.7374
1990's757 (10.50)18.2507
2000's1776 (24.63)29.6817
2010's3391 (47.03)24.3611
2020's371 (5.14)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 65.30

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index65.30 (24.57)
Research Supply Index2.77 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.69 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index105.17 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (65.30)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials1,463 (19.36%)5.53%
Trials0 (0.00%)5.53%
Reviews787 (10.42%)6.00%
Reviews0 (0.00%)6.00%
Case Studies1,122 (14.85%)4.05%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Observational17 (0.22%)0.25%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other4,167 (55.15%)84.16%
Other15 (100.00%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (175)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Two-Arm, Phase III Study in Patients With Untreated Stage III (Unresectable) or IV Melanoma Receiving Dacarbazine Plus 10 mg/kg Ipilimumab (MDX-010) vs. Dacarbazine With Placebo [NCT00324155]Phase 3681 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Phase III Trial of High Dose Interferon Alfa 2-b Versus Cisplatin, Vinblastine, DTIC Plus IL-2 and Interferon in Patients With High Risk Melanoma [NCT00006237]Phase 3432 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-08-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Tunlametinib Capsules Versus Combination Chemotherapy of Investigator's Choice in Advanced NRAS-mutant Melanoma Patients Who Had Previously Received Immunotherapy [NCT06008106]Phase 3165 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-22Not yet recruiting
[NCT01569204]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase III, 2-arm Study Comparing Efficacy and Tolerability of the Intensified Variant 'Dose-dense/Dose-intense ABVD' (ABVD DD-DI) With an Interim PET Response-adapted ABVD Program as Upfront Therapy in Advanced-stage [NCT03159897]Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-01Active, not recruiting
A Randomised Phase III Trial With a PET Response Adapted Design Comparing ABVD +/- ISRT With A2VD +/- ISRT in Patients With Previously Untreated Stage IA/IIA Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT04685616]Phase 31,042 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-14Recruiting
Non-Comparative, Multi-Cohort, Single Arm, Open-Label, Phase 2 Study of Nivolumab (BMS-936558) in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) Subjects [NCT02181738]Phase 2294 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-12Completed
CD20-Immunotargeting in Metastatic Melanoma Patients- A Prospective, Open Label, Sequential Pilot Study [NCT01376713]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
A Randomized Controlled Study of YONDELIS (Trabectedin) or Dacarbazine for the Treatment of Advanced Liposarcoma or Leiomyosarcoma [NCT01343277]Phase 3579 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
PV-10 Intralesional Injection vs Systemic Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma [NCT02288897]Phase 320 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Inadequate rate of enrollment)
A Phase II, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Efficacy of AZD6244 in Combination With Dacarbazine Compared With Dacarbazine Alone in First Line Patients With BRAF Mutation Positive Advanced Cutaneous or Unknown Primary Melanoma [NCT00936221]Phase 2385 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
First Line Chemotherapy for Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma in Russia [NCT04638790]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-01Recruiting
Phase II Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study of Sorafenib in Repeated Cycles of 21 Days in Combination With Dacarbazine (DTIC) Chemotherapy in Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma [NCT00110994]Phase 2101 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A Phase II Study of PI-88 With Dacarbazine in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00130442]Phase 2134 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Extended Schedule, Escalated Dose Temozolomide Versus Dacarbazine in Stage IV Metastatic Melanoma: A Randomized Phase III Study of the EORTC Melanoma Group [NCT00091572]Phase 3859 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-20Completed
Solitary Fibrous Tumor: Phase II Study on Trabectedin Versus Adriamycin Plus Dacarbazine in Advanced Patients [NCT03023124]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-04Recruiting
Nivolumab and AVD in Early-stage Unfavorable Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT03004833]Phase 2110 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-21Active, not recruiting
Localized High-Risk Soft Tissue Sarcomas Of The Extremities And Trunk Wall In Adults: An Integrating Approach Comprising Standard Vs Histotype-Tailored Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [NCT01710176]Phase 3550 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-01Active, not recruiting
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Active Controlled, Two-parallel Groups, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Masitinib at 7.5 mg/kg/Day to Dacarbazine in the Treatment of Patients With Non-resectable or Metastatic Stage [NCT01280565]Phase 3134 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor decision based on portfolio prioritization)
A Phase 3, Open Label, Randomized, Comparative Study Of CP-675,206 And Either Dacarbazine Or Temozolomide In Patients With Advanced Melanoma [NCT00257205]Phase 3655 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Phase I-II Trial of Sunitinib and/or Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcomas [NCT03277924]Phase 1/Phase 2270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-31Recruiting
A Phase 2 Open-label Study of Brentuximab Vedotin in Front-line Therapy of Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) an dCD30-expressing Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL) in Older Patients or Patients With Significant Comorbidities Ineligible for Standard Chemotherapy [NCT01716806]Phase 2131 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
Adcetris (Brentuximab Vedotin), Substituting Vincristine in the OEPA/COPDac Regimen [Treatment Group 3 (TG3) of Euro-Net C1] With Involved Node Radiation Therapy for High Risk Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) [NCT01920932]Phase 277 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-12Active, not recruiting
A Phase II, Multicenter, Open Label Study of Treatment Intensification With ACVD and Brentuximab-Vedotin in Advanced-stage Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients With a Positive Interim PET Scan After 2 ABVD Cycles [NCT03527628]Phase 2220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-01Recruiting
Phase II Multicenter Randomized Study to Compare Dacarbazine With Melatonin or Metformin Versus Dacarbazine in the First Line Therapy of Disseminated Melanoma [NCT02190838]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Preliminary terminated due to inefficacy)
A Single-center, Open-arm, Single-arm Phase II Trial of the PD-1 Antibody Tirelizumab Plus Dacarbazine as First-line Treatment for Advanced Melanoma [NCT05466474]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-30Recruiting
HD17 for Intermediate Stages - Treatment Optimization Trial in the First-Line Treatment of Intermediate Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT01356680]Phase 31,100 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-13Completed
Impact of O6-methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) Promoter Methylation and MGMT Expression on Dacarbazine Treated Sarcoma Patients (MGMT) [NCT04893356]75 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-01-20Active, not recruiting
A Pilot Trial of AVD and Brentuximab Vedotin (SGN-35) in the Treatment of Stage II-IV HIV-Associated Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT01771107]Phase 1/Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-07Active, not recruiting
Prospective Randomized Comparison of ABVD Versus BEACOPP Chemotherapy With or Without Radiotherapy for Advanced Stage or Unfavorable Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL) [NCT01251107]Phase 3331 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-03-31Completed
Phase II Clinical Trial of Camrelizumab Combined With AVD (Epirubicin, Vincristine and Dacarbazine) in the First-line Treatment for Patients With Advanced Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT04067037]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-26Recruiting
A Phase II, Multicentre, Open, Randomised, Dose Ranging Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Combination Therapy Containing Dacarbazine (DTIC) Plus Low Dose Interferon Alpha (aIFN) Plus Thymosin a1 Versus Both DTIC Plus Thymosin a1 and DTIC Plus aIFN in P [NCT00911443]Phase 2488 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-07-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Brentuximab Vedotin Combined With AVD Chemotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Early Stage, Unfavorable Risk Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT01868451]118 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Active, not recruiting
Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (KEYNOTE-C11) [NCT05008224]Phase 2146 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-07Active, not recruiting
A Phase II, Multi-center, Open-label, Uncontrolled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BAY 43-9006 Given Daily in Combination With Repeated 21-Day Cycles of Dacarbazine (DTIC) Chemotherapy in Subjects With Advanced Metastatic Melanoma. [NCT00492297]Phase 283 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A Multi-centre, Two-arm, Randomized, Open, Phase II Study Investigating SentoClone® Compared to Reference Treatment in Advanced Malignant Melanoma [NCT00991250]Phase 2140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-10-31Recruiting
Phase III Study Comparing Rituximab-supplemented ABVD (R-ABVD) With ABVD Followed by Involved-field Radiotherapy (ABVD-RT) in Limited Stage (Stage I-IIA With no Areas of Bulk) Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00992030]Phase 3112 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Low recruitment and difficulty in having study data)
Phase II Randomized, Open-Label Study of IMC-1121B With or Without Dacarbazine in Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma [NCT00533702]Phase 2106 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Multicenter, Double-blinding, Randomized Controlled, Phase II Clinical Trial on Combined Chemotherapy of Endostar (Recombinant Human Endostatin) for Untreated Patients With Advanced Melanoma [NCT00813449]Phase 2140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-08-31Recruiting
Phase III Randomized, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Effect of R-mabHDI in Patients With Lymphocytic Predominant Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00816959]Phase 31,200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-07-31Not yet recruiting
European Network-Paediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (EuroNet-PHL) Second International Inter-Group Study for Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma in Children and Adolescents [NCT02684708]Phase 32,200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-01Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of the Tumor-targeting Human Antibody-cytokine Fusion Protein L19TNF in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Stage or Metastatic Soft-tissue Sarcoma [NCT04733183]Phase 298 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-28Recruiting
A Randomized Phase 3 Interim Response Adapted Trial Comparing Standard Therapy With Immuno-oncology Therapy for Children and Adults With Newly Diagnosed Stage I and II Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT05675410]Phase 31,875 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-11Recruiting
Rituximab and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage II, Stage III, or Stage IV Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00369681]Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Study of GSK2132231A Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic in Association With Chemotherapy in Patients With Unresectable and Progressive Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma [NCT00849875]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-26Terminated(stopped due to Early end of trial notification after termination of long term follow up due to lack of scientific justification to continue collect information.)
A Phase II Trial of Response-Adapted Therapy of Stage III-IV Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Early Interim FDG-PET Imaging [NCT00822120]Phase 2371 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Parallel, 3-arm Study to Characterize the Effect of Ipilimumab + Chemotherapy in Patients With Untreated Advanced Melanoma [NCT00796991]Phase 172 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Phase II Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study of the Safety and Efficacy of IMCgp100 Compared With Investigator Choice in HLA-A*0201 Positive Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Uveal Melanoma [NCT03070392]Phase 2378 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-16Active, not recruiting
Randomized Phase II Trial of Temozolomide Versus Hyd-Sulfate AZD6244 [NSC 748727] in Patients With Metastatic Uveal Melanoma [NCT01143402]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Monocentric Pilot Study Investigating the Metabolic Activity of Melanoma in Vivo During Sorafenib and Dacarbazine [NCT00794235]Phase 212 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
HD16 for Early Stages - Treatment Optimization Trial in the First-line Treatment of Early Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma; Treatment Stratification by Means of FDG-PET [NCT00736320]Phase 31,150 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of OrienX010 in Previously Untreated With Dacarbazine Patients in Unresectable Stage IIIb/IIIc or Stage IV(Mla/Mlb) Malignant Melanoma [NCT04200040]Phase 2165 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-27Recruiting
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase III Trial of ABI-007 vs Dacarbazine in Previously Untreated Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma [NCT00864253]Phase 3529 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-23Completed
Phase II Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial on PTK-ZK With or Without DTIC in Patients With Non-resectable Metastatic Malignant Melanoma [NCT00615160]Phase 1/Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Substance was withdrawn from further development.)
Phase I/II Clinical Trial for the Evaluation of the Interaction Between Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Melanoma Patients [NCT00559026]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Phase II Study of Dacarbazine With the Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Antibody (Bevacizumab) in Patients With Unresectable/Metastatic Melanoma [NCT01164007]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Study Characterizing the Impact of Different Therapeutic Strategies on Event Occurrence at 2 Years, 5 Years, 10 Years, and 15 Years, According to Prognostic Groups in Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT00920153]Phase 3442 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Other new drugs)
Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Primary Uveal Melanoma With Genetic Imbalance [NCT01100528]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-11Completed
Phase II Trial of Sorafenib and Dacarbazine in Soft Tissue Sarcoma [NCT00837148]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Phase II Open Label, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Study Comparing the Efficacy of R-mabHD Alone and a Combination of Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vinblastine and Dacarbazine (ABVD)in Treating Patients With Hodgkin's Disease. [NCT00797472]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-07-31Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of Rituximab With ABVD Versus Standard ABVD for Patients With Advanced-Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma With Poor Risk Features (IPS Score > 2) [NCT00654732]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-19Completed
Multiple Part Clinical Trial of Brentuximab Vedotin in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Subjects [NCT03646123]Phase 2255 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-28Active, not recruiting
Prospectively Randomized Phase III Study of an Individualized Sensitivity-Directed Combination Chemotherapy Versus DTIC as First-Line Treatment in Stage IV Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00779714]Phase 3360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-10-31Recruiting
A Pilot Trial of Adriamycin, Pembrolizumab, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine (APVD) for Patients With Untreated Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT03331341]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-09Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label, Cross-over Pharmacokinetic Study of Dacarbazine in Combination With Genasense® in Subjects With Advanced Melanoma [NCT00542893]Phase 10 participants Interventional2006-04-30Completed
A Phase 2/3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Unesbulin in Unresectable or Metastatic, Relapsed or Refractory Leiomyosarcoma [NCT05269355]Phase 2/Phase 3345 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-23Active, not recruiting
A Phase III, Randomized Study of Nivolumab (Opdivo) Plus AVD or Brentuximab Vedotin (Adcetris) Plus AVD in Patients (Age >/= 12 Years) With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT03907488]Phase 3995 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1B Study of Unesbulin (PTC596) in Combination With Dacarbazine in Patients With Locally Recurrent, Unresectable or Metastatic Relapsed/Refractory Leiomyosarcoma [NCT03761095]Phase 141 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-13Active, not recruiting
Dose Definition and Activity Evaluation Study of the Tumor-Targeting Human L19IL2 Monoclonal Antibody-Cytokine Fusion Protein in Combination With Dacarbazine in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [NCT01055522]Phase 2102 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Terminated
A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Safety Study of Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination With Multi-Agent Chemotherapy as Frontline Therapy in Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT01060904]Phase 151 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A Phase II Evaluation of DMAP Plus GM-CSF in the Treatment of Advanced, Persistent, or Recurrent Leiomyosarcoma of the Uterus [NCT00033644]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-03-31Terminated
IDE196 (Darovasertib) in Combination With Crizotinib Versus Investigator's Choice of Treatment as First-line Therapy in HLA-A2 Negative Metastatic Uveal Melanoma (DAR-UM-2) [NCT05987332]Phase 2/Phase 3380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-31Recruiting
PET Adapted Brentuximab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab in Combination With Doxorubicin and Dacarbazine in Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT05922904]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-14Recruiting
A Phase III Study of AL3818 (Anlotinib, Catequentinib) Hydrochloride Monotherapy in Subjects With Metastatic or Advanced Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma and Synovial Sarcoma [NCT03016819]Phase 3325 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-15Active, not recruiting
Phase I Trial of Dacarbazine and Bortezomib in Melanoma and Soft Tissue Sarcoma [NCT00580320]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized, Phase Ib/II Study of E7080 (Lenvatinib) in Combination With Dacarbazine Versus Dacarbazine Alone as First Line Therapy in Patients With Stage IV Melanoma. [NCT01133977]Phase 1/Phase 297 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Response-Adapted Chemotherapy Based on Positron Emission Tomography for Non-Bulky Stage I and II Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT01132807]Phase 2164 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
BRIM 3: A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled, Multicenter, Phase III Study in Previously Untreated Patients With Unresectable Stage IIIC or Stage IV Melanoma With V600E BRAF Mutation Receiving Vemurafenib (RO5185426) or Dacarbazine [NCT01006980]Phase 3675 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Interleukin-21 (rIL-21) Versus Dacarbazine (DTIC) in Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Melanoma [NCT01152788]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-05Completed
An International, Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial. Treatment for Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma in Children and Adolescents Standard Treatment (Chemotherapy and RT) Compared With Experimental Treatment (Chemotherapy Without RT or Restricted to RT) [NCT02797717]2,200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-11-30Recruiting
[NCT00006200]Phase 20 participants InterventionalActive, not recruiting
NB2004 Trial Protocol for Risk Adapted Treatment of Children With Neuroblastoma [NCT00410631]Phase 3642 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-10-31Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label, Phase 3 Trial of A+AVD Versus ABVD as Frontline Therapy in Patients With Advanced Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT01712490]Phase 31,334 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-09Active, not recruiting
The TEAM Trial (Tasigna Efficacy in Advanced Melanoma): A Phase II, Open Label, Multi-center, Single-arm Study to Assess the Efficacy of Tasigna ® in the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic and/or Inoperable Melanoma Harboring a c-Kit Mutation [NCT01028222]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Phase I, Open Label, Study of the Safety and Tolerability of KU-0059436 and Dacarbazine in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours [NCT00516802]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Phase I Safety Study of the Combination of Lenalidomide and Dacarbazine (DTIC) in Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma Previously Untreated With Systemic Chemotherapy (CC-5013-MEL-003) [NCT00412581]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Phase III Randomized, Open-label Study Comparing GSK2118436 to Dacarbazine (DTIC) in Previously Untreated Subjects With BRAF Mutation Positive Advanced (Stage III) or Metastatic (Stage IV) Melanoma [NCT01227889]Phase 3251 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-23Completed
PHASE III MULTICENTRE TRIAL OF TREATMENT OF NEUROBLASTOMA IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS [NCT00002802]Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1990-07-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Dacarbazine With or Without Genasense in Chemotherapy-naive Subjects With Advanced Melanoma and Low LDH (The AGENDA Trial) [NCT00518895]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
An Open-Label Study of Brentuximab Vedotin + Adriamycin, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine in Pediatric Patients With Advanced Stage Newly Diagnosed Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT02979522]Phase 1/Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-06Completed
A Phase 1/2, Multi-Center, Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the Human Monoclonal Antibody to Human α ν Integrins (CNTO 95), Alone and in Combination With Dacarbazine, in Subjects With Stage IV Melanoma [NCT00246012]Phase 1/Phase 2144 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Sequential SGN-35 Therapy With Adriamycin, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine (S-AVD) for Older Patients With Untreated Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT01476410]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Active, not recruiting
Continuation Protocol For G3139 (Bcl-2 Antisense Oligonucleotide) And Dacarbazine In Patients With Malignant Melanoma Who Responded To This Combination In Protocol GM301 [NCT00070343]0 participants Interventional2003-08-31Active, not recruiting
Hodgkin's Disease Study [NCT00416377]353 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalActive, not recruiting
A Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center, Phase III Clinical Study to Investigate Recombinant Humanized PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody Injection (JS001) Versus Dacarbazine as the 1st-line Therapy for Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma [NCT03430297]Phase 3256 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-02Active, not recruiting
First International Inter-Group Study for Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Children and Adolescents [NCT00433459]Phase 32,134 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Controlled Phase II Study to Compare Capecitabine Combined With Dacarbazine(CAPDTIC) Versus Capecitabine Combined Temozolomide(CAPTEM) in Advanced and Metastatic Gastrointestinal Pancreatic and Esophageal Neuroendocrine Tumor [NCT03279601]Phase 2148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-09-01Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Toxicity of Imatinib Mesylate in Combination With Dacarbazine and Capecitabine in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma [NCT00354523]Phase 1/Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Study closed following Phase I portion, insufficient activity to continue to Phase II.)
Phase I Evaluation of Sodium Stibogluconate in Combination With Interferon α-2b Followed by Cisplatin, Vinblastine and Dacarbazine for Patients With Melanoma or Malignancies Potentially Responsive to SSG and/or Interferons [NCT00498979]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
A Phase I, Open-Label, Multi-center Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) When Given in Combination With Standard Doses of Selected Chemotherapies to Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00600496]Phase 1140 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-14Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Rituximab + ABVD for Patients With Hodgkin's Disease [NCT00504504]Phase 285 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-03-31Completed
A Randomized Phase III Trial to Assess Response Adapted Therapy Using FDG-PET Imaging in Patients With Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT00678327]Phase 31,202 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of a-Interferon With Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Velban, and Dacarbazine (ABVD) for Patients With Hodgkin's Disease [NCT01404936]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-07-31Completed
Trial Protocol for the Treatment of Children With High Risk Neuroblastoma (NB2004-HR) [NCT00526318]360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-01-31Recruiting
Fotemustine and Dacarbazine Versus Dacarbazine +/- Alpha Interferon in Advanced Malignant Melanoma: Phase III Study [NCT01359956]Phase 3269 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-04-30Completed
Adjuvant Interleukin2 (Proleukin)and 5-(3,3 Dimethyl-1-Triazeno) Imidazole-4-Carboxamide (DTIC) in Resected High-Risk Primary and Regionally Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00553618]Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-08-31Active, not recruiting
HD21 for Advanced Stages Treatment Optimization Trial in the First-line Treatment of Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma; Comparison of 6 Cycles of Escalated BEACOPP With 6 Cycles of BrECADD [NCT02661503]Phase 31,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-07-31Recruiting
Standard Palliative Care Versus Standard Palliative Care Plus Polychemotherapy (CVD-Protocol) in the Second-Line Therapy of Distant Metastasized Malignant Melanoma [NCT00226473]Phase 4200 participants Interventional2001-09-30Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Sunitinib and Dacarbazine in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00496223]Phase 1/Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Terminated(stopped due to toxicities required dose reduction compromising effectiveness and PI left Moffitt)
Phase II Trial of Sequenced Chemotherapy With Dacarbazine and Carmustine With Neulasta® Support in Previously Treated Metastatic Melanoma [NCT01692691]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Terminated(stopped due to PI decision)
A Randomised Phase II Study of Sunitinib Versus Dacarbazine in the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Uveal Melanoma [NCT01551459]Phase 2124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Phase II Open-Label Study of Volociximab in Combination With DTIC in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Not Previously Treated With Chemo [NCT00099970]Phase 240 participants Interventional2004-12-31Completed
Randomized Study Of Dacarbazine Versus Dacarbazine Plus G3139 (Bcl-2 Antisense Oligonucleotide) In Patients With Advanced Malignant Melanoma [NCT00016263]Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-07-31Completed
A Phase II, Randomized, Open-Label Study Evaluating The Antitumor Activity Of MEDI-522, A Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Directed Against The Human Alpha V Beta 3 Integrin, ± Dacarbazine In Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00066196]Phase 2110 participants Interventional2003-08-31Completed
ProMune™ (CPG 7909 Injection) With or Without Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Stage III b/c or IV Melanoma: A Randomized, Multi-Center, Open Label, Parallel Group, Active-Controlled, Phase II/III Study [NCT00070642]Phase 2184 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
A Prospective Random Assignment Trial Comparing Complete Metastasectomy to Chemotherapy for Selected Patients With Stage IV Melanoma [NCT00072124]Phase 30 participants Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Neuroblastoma Study Phase II Study of Various Therapies in Patients With Neuroblastoma [NCT00017225]Phase 20 participants Interventional1997-05-31Completed
A Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Treatment With 2 mg Intralesional Allovectin-7® Compared to Dacarbazine (DTIC) or Temozolomide (TMZ) in Subjects With Recurrent Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00395070]Phase 3390 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study Of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Angiogenesis Inhibitor SU5416 (NSC # 696819; A TK Inhibitor Anti-Angionesises Compound), And Radiation Therapy In The Management Of High Risk, High-Grade, Soft Tissue Sarcomas Of The Extremities And Body Wal [NCT00023738]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-08-31Completed
Protocol For The Treatment Of Children And Adolescents With Hodgkin's Disease [NCT00025064]Phase 2260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2000-01-31Active, not recruiting
Prophylactic Use of Filgrastim SD/01 In Patients With Hodgkin's Disease Receiving ABVD Chemotherapy [NCT00038558]Phase 325 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
Protocol for a Randomized Phase III Study of the Stanford V Regimen, Compared With ABVD for the Treatment of Advanced Hodgkin's Disease [NCT00041210]Phase 3850 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-10-31Active, not recruiting
Optimising Therapy for Boys With Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Quality Assurance of Therapy for Girls With Hodgkin's Lymphoma Until Start of a New Prospective Trial for Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Childhood and Adolescence [NCT00416832]Phase 2648 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Bevacizumab, Dacarbazine and Interferon Alfa-2a Combination as a First-Line Therapy in Patients With Locally Advancing or Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00308607]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
A Phase 2, Single Arm Study on Dacarbazine (DTIC) Followed by Immunotherapy Re-challenge in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma With Primary Resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 or PD-1 + CTLA-4 Blockade [NCT04225390]Phase 238 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-13Recruiting
A Phase II Multi-Center Open-Label Trial of Six Doses of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy Prior to Limited Chemotherapy as Front-Line Therapy for Patients With Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma, Including Elderly Patients. [NCT06164275]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
Multicenter, Open-label Study of YONDELIS (Trabectedin) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Liposarcoma or Leiomyosarcoma [NCT01692678]Phase 316 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-07Completed
Determination of Tumor Response Rate by RECIST and FDG-PET Criteria to Dacarbazine in Metastatic Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma [NCT00802880]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Bevacizumab Monotherapy With Dacarbazine (DTIC) in Treatment of Malignant Melanoma, Focusing on Angiogenic Markers and Prevention of Hypertension. [NCT01705392]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of financing of the study drug. Not sufficient financial support.)
Temozolomide or Dacarbazine-based Chemotherapy Plus Endostatin in Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor [NCT01845675]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of BMS-936558 vs Dacarbazine in Subjects With Previously Untreated, Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma [NCT01721772]Phase 3418 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-18Completed
A Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized Phase II Trial of the MEK Inhibitor Pimasertib or Dacarbazine in Previously Untreated Subjects With N-Ras Mutated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Malignant Cutaneous Melanoma [NCT01693068]Phase 2194 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-05Completed
Phase 2 Study of Ipilimumab Plus Dacarbazine in Japanese Patients With Previously Untreated Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma [NCT01681212]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of PET-Directed Therapy Using AVD (Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine) Plus Brentuximab Vedotin Induction Chemotherapy, With or Without Brentuximab Vedotin Plus Nivolumab, Followed by Nivolumab Consolidation for Patients With Previ [NCT03233347]Phase 282 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-10-13Active, not recruiting
A Prospective Multicenter Study on HIV-associated Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT01468740]Phase 2130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-03-31Recruiting
Brentuximab Vedotin Associated With Chemotherapy in Untreated Patients With Stage I/II Unfavourable Hodgkin Lymphoma. A Randomized Phase II LYSA-FIL-EORTC Intergroup Study [NCT02292979]Phase 2170 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
Metronomic Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma: A Phase II Study of Low Dose Vinblastine, Cyclophosphamide, and Dacarbazine [NCT01542255]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual not allowing to support statistical endpoints)
Randomized, Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma (KEYNOTE 002) [NCT01704287]Phase 2540 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-20Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Two-arm, Comparative Study in Chinese Subjects With Chemotherapy Naïve Stage IV Melanoma Receiving Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) vs. Dacarbazine [NCT02545075]Phase 3182 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
A Prospective Phase I and Consecutive Phase II, Two-arm, Randomized Multi-center Trial of Temsirolimus in Combination With Pioglitazone, Etoricoxib and Metronomic Low-dose Trofosfamide Versus Dacarbazine (DTIC) in Patients With Advanced Melanoma [NCT01614301]Phase 1/Phase 2136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-05-31Recruiting
Phase II Study of Filgrastim (G-CSF) Plus ABVD in the Treatment of HIV-Associated Hodgkin's Disease [NCT00000626]Phase 227 participants InterventionalCompleted
Phase III Trial Investigating the Potential Benefit of Intensified Peri-operative Chemotherapy With in High-risk CINSARC Patients With Resectable Soft-tissue SARComas [NCT03805022]Phase 3351 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-14Recruiting
Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma Patients With Regional Lymph Node Metastases With Interferon Alfa-2B vs. Biochemotherapy Using Cisplatin + Vinblastine + DTIC + Interferon Plus IL-2 [NCT00002882]Phase 3140 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-11-30Completed
Pilot Study for the Treatment of Children With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage Hodgkin's Disease: Upfront Dose Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT00004010]Phase 299 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-10-31Completed
A PHASE II STUDY OF NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIATION THERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HIGH-RISK, HIGH-GRADE, SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS OF THE EXTREMITIES AND BODY WALL [NCT00002791]Phase 20 participants Interventional1997-02-28Completed
A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Early High Dose Chemotherapy and an Autologous Stem Cell Transplant to Conventional Dose ABVD Chemotherapy for Patients With Advanced Stage Poor Prognosis Hodgkin's Disease as Defined by the International Prognostic [NCT00005090]Phase 311 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-04-30Terminated(stopped due to poor accrual)
A UKLG Randomised Trial of Initial Chemotherapy for Advanced Stage Hodgkins Disease [NCT00003421]Phase 3800 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-06-30Completed
Phase II Study of Outpatient CDDP and DTIC Followed by GM-CSF, IFN-a2b, and IL-2 in Patients With Advanced Melanoma [NCT00004141]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-08-31Completed
A Phase III Study of Radiotherapy or ABVD Plus Radiotherapy Versus ABVD Alone in the Treatment of Early Stage Hodgkin's Disease [NCT00002561]Phase 3405 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-01-25Completed
TREATMENT OF METASTATIC MELANOMA WITH DTIC, CDDP AND IFN ALPHA WITH OR WITHOUT IL-2: A RANDOMIZED PHASE III TRIAL [NCT00002669]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1995-06-30Completed
The NEMO Trial (NRAS Melanoma and MEK Inhibitor):A Randomized Phase III, Open Label, Multicenter, Two-arm Study Comparing the Efficacy of MEK162 Versus Dacarbazine in Patients With Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic NRAS Mutation-positive Melanoma [NCT01763164]Phase 3402 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-12Completed
Brentuximab Vedotin Plus AD in Non-bulky Limited Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT02505269]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-07Completed
A Phase 2 Front-Line PET/CT-2 Response-Adapted Brentuximab Vedotin and Nivolumab Incorporated and Radiation-Free Management of Early Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) [NCT03712202]Phase 2155 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-28Active, not recruiting
Phase 2 Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) With Gemcitabine Followed by Systemic Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Dacarbazine for Locally Recurrent Uterine Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) [NCT04727242]Phase 225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-28Recruiting
Phase II Trial of Response-Adapted Therapy Based on Positron Emission Tomography (PET) for Bulky Stage I and II Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) [NCT01390584]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-24Terminated(stopped due to slow accrual)
A Randomized Phase III Trial of ABVD Versus Stanford V (+/-) Radiation Therapy in Locally Extensive and Advanced Stage Hodgkin's Disease [NCT00003389]Phase 3854 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-06-17Completed
Effect of Refnot on Immunity in Cancer Patients [NCT05898451]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-04Completed
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Concurrent Biochemotherapy With Cisplatin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine, IL-2 and Interferon A-2B Versus Cisplatin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine Alone in Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma [NCT00003027]Phase 3482 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-11-13Completed
Pediatric Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Consortium Study: cHOD17 [NCT03755804]Phase 2250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-12Recruiting
TAGGED: A Phase 2 Study Using Low Dose/Metronomic Trabectedin, Gemcitabine, and Dacarbazine as 2nd/3rd/4th Line Therapy for Advanced Leiomyosarcoma [NCT04535271]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-09Recruiting
Very Early PET-response Adapted Targeted Therapy for Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma: a Single -Arm Phase II Study [NCT03517137]Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-01Active, not recruiting
BEACOPP (4 Cycles Escalated + 4 Cycles Baseline) Versus ABVD (8 Cycles) In Stage III & IV Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00049595]Phase 3552 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
A Pilot Phase II Study of Pre-Operative Radiation Therapy and Thalidomide (IND 48832; NSC 66847) for Low Grade Primary Soft Tissue Sarcoma or Pre-Operative MAID/Thalidomide/Radiation Therapy for High/Intermediate Grade Primary Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the E [NCT00089544]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-17Terminated
An Open-label, Uncontrolled, Multicenter Phase II Trial of MK-3475 (Pembrolizumab) in Children and Young Adults With Newly Diagnosed Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma With Inadequate (Slow Early) Response to Frontline Chemotherapy (KEYNOTE 667) [NCT03407144]Phase 2340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-09Active, not recruiting
Phase III Randomized Study of Dacarbazine With or Without Allovectin-7 in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00003647]Phase 30 participants Interventional1998-07-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Dasatinib and Dacarbazine in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00597038]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Randomised, Double-Blind Study to Assess the Efficacy of Selumetinib (AZD6244: ARRY-142886) (Hyd-Sulfate) in Combination With Dacarbazine Compared With Placebo in Combination With Dacarbazine as First Systemic Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Uveal M [NCT01974752]Phase 3152 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
High-Risk Neuroblastoma Study 2 of SIOP-Europa-Neuroblastoma (SIOPEN) [NCT04221035]Phase 3800 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-05Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Eribulin With Dacarbazine in Subjects With Soft Tissue Sarcoma [NCT01327885]Phase 3452 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-10Completed
Fitness-adapted, Pembrolizumab-based Therapy for Untreated Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients 60 Years of Age and Above (cHL 001) [NCT05404945]Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-26Recruiting
Randomized Phase II Study Comparing the MET Inhibitor Cabozantinib to Temozolomide/Dacarbazine in Ocular Melanoma [NCT01835145]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Phase II Study of PET-Directed Frontline Therapy With Pembrolizumab and AVD for Patients With Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT03226249]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-09Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II of Nivolumab and A(B)VD in the Front-line Setting for High Risk Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT03033914]Phase 1/Phase 281 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-25Recruiting
A Randomized Open-Label Phase 3 Trial of BMS-936558 (Nivolumab) Versus Investigator's Choice in Advanced (Unresectable or Metastatic) Melanoma Patients Progressing Post Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy [NCT01721746]Phase 3405 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-21Completed
Brentuximab Vedotin Plus AVD in Non-bulky Limited Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT01534078]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00003389 (3) [back to overview]Failure-free Survival at 5 Years
NCT00003389 (3) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival
NCT00003389 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Second Cancers
NCT00006237 (3) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival
NCT00006237 (3) [back to overview]5-year Relapse-Free Survival
NCT00006237 (3) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT00089544 (1) [back to overview]Treatment Delivery With Compliance Defined as Receiving at Least 95% of the Pre-operative Protocol Dose of RT, All 3 Cycles of MAID (if Applicable), and Receive Thalidomide on 75% of the Days During Radiation
NCT00091572 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Objective Response
NCT00091572 (4) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate in Subjects With Measurable Lesions
NCT00091572 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00091572 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00110994 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Tumor Response Categories
NCT00110994 (10) [back to overview]Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to the Visit When the Best Tumor Response Was Noted
NCT00110994 (10) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT00110994 (10) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00110994 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00110994 (10) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT00110994 (10) [back to overview]Change of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score From Baseline to the Visit at Which Best Response Was First Noted
NCT00110994 (10) [back to overview]Change of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score From Baseline to the End of Treatment
NCT00110994 (10) [back to overview]Change of European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index Score From Baseline to the End of Treatment
NCT00110994 (10) [back to overview]Change of European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index Score From Baseline to the Visit at Which Best Response Was First Noted
NCT00130442 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00130442 (4) [back to overview]Non-progression Rate
NCT00130442 (4) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00130442 (4) [back to overview]Survival
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Total Clearance (CL) of Intetumumab After Intravenous Administration - Phase 1 (Part 1)
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Time to Worsening in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status - Phase 2
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) - Phase 2
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Stable Disease (SD) - Phase 2
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CR - Phase 2
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Best Overall Tumor Response as Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) - Phase 2
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Best Overall Response as CR, PR, or SD - Phase 2
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) - Phase 2
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) - Phase 1
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Intetumumab - Phase 2
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 2)
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 1)
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Half-life of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 2)
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Half-life of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 1)
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Area Under the Serum Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 2)
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Area Under the Serum Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 1)
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Between Zero to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 1)
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma Subscale (FACT-MS) Score - Phase 2
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution (Vz) of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 1)
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Score - Phase 2
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution (Vz) of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 2)
NCT00246012 (22) [back to overview]Total Clearance (CL) of Intetumumab After Intravenous Administration - Phase 1 (Part 2)
NCT00324155 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 2-3 and Grade 3-4 Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) With Resolution Resolved
NCT00324155 (13) [back to overview]Time to Resolution of Grade 2-3, Grade 3-4 Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs)
NCT00324155 (13) [back to overview]Survival Rate at 1 Year, 18 Months, 2 Years, and 3 Years
NCT00324155 (13) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate Truncated at Week 12
NCT00324155 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Drug-related AEs, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related Hypersensitivity, Immune-related AEs/SAEs, and Inflammatory AEs/SAEs
NCT00324155 (13) [back to overview]Median Number of Months of Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00324155 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Stable Disease (SD): Randomized Participants With Stable Disease
NCT00324155 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR): Randomized Participants With Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
NCT00324155 (13) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Rate (BORR)
NCT00324155 (13) [back to overview]Time to Response: All Randomized Participants With Response to Treatment
NCT00324155 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Brain Metastasis-Free Survival at Time of Data Cutoff
NCT00324155 (13) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00324155 (13) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (DCR)
NCT00369681 (3) [back to overview]Effect of Rituximab on EBV(+) Tumors
NCT00369681 (3) [back to overview]Relationship Between Marker Detection and Clinical Outcome
NCT00369681 (3) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT00492297 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Progression-free Survival at Specific Time-points
NCT00492297 (11) [back to overview]Overall Best Response
NCT00492297 (11) [back to overview]Disease Control (DC)
NCT00492297 (11) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT00492297 (11) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00492297 (11) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00492297 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Response
NCT00492297 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Stable Disease
NCT00492297 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00492297 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Partial Response
NCT00492297 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00504504 (1) [back to overview]5-year Failure-free Survival Rate for Participants With Hodgkin's Disease Given Rituximab With ABVD
NCT00533702 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) or Better (Disease Control Rate) at 12 Weeks
NCT00533702 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00533702 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Response Rate) at 12 Weeks
NCT00533702 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) [Overall Response Rate (ORR)]
NCT00533702 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) or Better (Disease Control Rate) at 6 Weeks
NCT00533702 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00533702 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)
NCT00597038 (4) [back to overview]Phase II - Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR)
NCT00597038 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 6 Months
NCT00597038 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With 12 Month Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00597038 (4) [back to overview]Recommended Phase II Dose
NCT00654732 (1) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) Rate
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameter of Clearance (CLT) for Ipilimumab, Paclitaxel, Dacarbazine and Active Metabolite AIC - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameter Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) for Ipilimumab, Paclitaxel, Dacarbazine and the Active Metabolite for Dacarbazine, 5-aminoimidazole-4carboxamide (AIC)- Pharmacokinetic Analysis Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Objective Response to Treatment and Disease Control Using mWHO Criteria - All Randomized Participants
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Neutrophils Plus Bands - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Grade for Leukocytes - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Grade for Hemoglobin - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Best Overall Response Categories Based on Modified World Health Organization (mWHO) Criteria - All Treated Participants
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Best Overall Response Categories Based on Immune Related (ir) Response Criteria (RC) - All Treated Participants
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Respiration Rate at Weeks 16 and 48 - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Weeks 16 and 48 - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline at Weeks 16 and 48 in Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Mean Baseline Change in Body Temperature at Weeks 16 and 48 - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, Deaths, and Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events From Day 1 to Week 48 - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Uric Acid - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Total Lipase - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Total Calcium (High) - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Total Bilirubin - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Total Amylase - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Serum Potassium (High) - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Alkaline Phosphatase - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Neutrophils - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Albumin - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Grade for Lymphocytes - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Platelet Count - All Treated Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameter Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) for Ipilimumab, Paclitaxel, Dacarbazine and Active Metabolite AIC - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameter of Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Ipilimumab, Paclitaxel, Dacarbazine and Active Metabolite AIC - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameter of Terminal Elimination Half Life (T-HALF) for Ipilimumab, Paclitaxel, Dacarbazine and Active Metabolite AIC - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Mean Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC) at Each Nominal Ipilimumab Induction Dose and at End of the Induction Period - Pharmacodynamic Population
NCT00796991 (31) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to 21 Days [AUC(0-21d)] for Ipilimumab and AUC Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity [AUC(INF)] for Paclitaxel, Dacarbazine and the Active Metabolite AIC - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Population
NCT00802880 (13) [back to overview]Overall Tumor Metabolic Response
NCT00802880 (13) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT00802880 (13) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00802880 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Nausea/Emesis (Any Grade)
NCT00802880 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Neutropenia (Grade 3/4)
NCT00802880 (13) [back to overview]Overall Disease Control Rate
NCT00802880 (13) [back to overview]Correlate Time to Progression With Best Metabolic Response
NCT00802880 (13) [back to overview]Correlate the Tumor Metabolic Response Rate With the Tumor Anatomic Response Rate
NCT00802880 (13) [back to overview]Correlate the Time to Progression With Best Anatomic Response
NCT00802880 (13) [back to overview]Correlate Overall Survival With Best Metabolic Response
NCT00802880 (13) [back to overview]Correlate Overall Survival With Best Anatomic Response
NCT00802880 (13) [back to overview]Comparison of the SUV at up to 3 Tumor Sites
NCT00802880 (13) [back to overview]Best Anatomical Tumor Response
NCT00822120 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of HIV-negative Patients Who Are PET-positive After 2 Cycles of ABVD With 2-year PFS
NCT00822120 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of HIV-negative Patients With 2-year Overall Survival (OS) Treated With 2 Initial Cycles of ABVD Followed by Response-Adapted Therapy Based on Interim FDG-PET Imaging
NCT00822120 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of HIV-negative Patients With 2-year Progression-free Survival (PFS) Treated With 2 Initial Cycles of Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vnblastine, and Dacarbazine (ABVD) Followed by Response-adapted Therapy Based on Interim FDG-PET Imaging.
NCT00822120 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of HIV-positive Patients With 2-year Progression-free Survival (PFS) Treated With Initial 2 Cycles of Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vnblastine, and Dacarbazine (ABVD) Followed by Response-adapted Therapy Based on Interim FDG-PET Imaging.
NCT00822120 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of HIV-positive Patients With 5-year Overall Survival (OS) Treated With 2 Initial Cycles of ABVD Followed by Response-Adapted Therapy Based on Interim FDG-PET Imaging.
NCT00822120 (8) [back to overview]Number of HIV-negative Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT00822120 (8) [back to overview]Number of HIV-positive Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT00822120 (8) [back to overview]Complete and Partial Response Rates for HIV-negative Patients Treated With Response- Adapted Therapy Based on FDG-PET Imaging After 2 Cycles of ABVD
NCT00837148 (1) [back to overview]Overall Objective Response
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypercalcemia (HCA) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Concentrations of Antibodies Against Protein D (Anti-PD)
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Anti-MAGE-A3 Antibody Concentrations
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Lymphopenia (LYM) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Bilirubine (BIL) Values by Maximum Grade.
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Creatinine (CREA) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Gamma-glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hemoglobin (HGB) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hyperkalemia (HKA) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypernatremia (HNA) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypoalbuminemia(hAL) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypocalcemia(hCA) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypokalemia (hKA) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Hyponatremia (hNA) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Leukocytes (LEU) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Neutrophils (NEU) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Platelets(PLT) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and With AEs by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and With AEs by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Mixed Response (MxR) to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Objective Tumor Response (OR) to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Stable Disease (SD) Response to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Alkaline Phosphatase (ALK) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Abnormal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Values by Maximum Grade
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients Reported With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs) That Were Causally Related to Treatment Administration by Maximum Grade.
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (TTF), by Gene Signature
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) for the Overall Population
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Gene Signature
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) After Slow Progressive Disease (SPD) by Gene Signature
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) by Gene Signature
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Seroconverted Patients for Melanoma Antigen (Anti-MAGE-A3)
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Treatment Response for Anti-PD
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Treatment Response for Anti-MAGE-A3 Antibodies
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Number of Patients Reported With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00849875 (37) [back to overview]Duration of Stable Disease (SD) Response to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment
NCT00864253 (12) [back to overview]Nadir for the Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Measurements
NCT00864253 (12) [back to overview]Nadir for the Hemoglobin Count Measurements
NCT00864253 (12) [back to overview]Nadir for White Blood Cells (WBCs) Measurements
NCT00864253 (12) [back to overview]Participant Survival
NCT00864253 (12) [back to overview]Nadir for Platelet Count Measurements.
NCT00864253 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) in Responding Participants
NCT00864253 (12) [back to overview]Summary of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00864253 (12) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Who Achieve an Objective Confirmed Complete or Partial Response Based on Blinded Radiology Assessment of Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.0
NCT00864253 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Reductions, or Dose Interruptions, or Dose Delays of Study Drug
NCT00864253 (12) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment Using RECIST Response Guidelines
NCT00864253 (12) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on a Blinded Radiology Assessment of Response Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Guidelines
NCT00864253 (12) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) for ≥ 16 Weeks, or Confirmed Complete or Partial Response (i.e., Disease Control) Based on a Blinded Radiology Assessment of Response
NCT00911443 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00911443 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00911443 (3) [back to overview]Overall Tumor Response
NCT00936221 (4) [back to overview]Change in Target Lesion Tumour Size at Week 12
NCT00936221 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00936221 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00936221 (4) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT01006980 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01006980 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01006980 (7) [back to overview]Time to Confirmed Response
NCT01006980 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01006980 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01006980 (7) [back to overview]Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response or Partial Response
NCT01006980 (7) [back to overview]Pre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study Day
NCT01028222 (8) [back to overview]PFS Rate
NCT01028222 (8) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01028222 (8) [back to overview]Time to Objective Response (TOR)
NCT01028222 (8) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (DCR)
NCT01028222 (8) [back to overview]Durable Overall Response Rate (DORR)
NCT01028222 (8) [back to overview]OS Rate
NCT01028222 (8) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01028222 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01100528 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Toxicity or Grade 4 Adverse Events Via CTCAE Version 3.0
NCT01100528 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Disease-free Survival (DFS)
NCT01132807 (3) [back to overview]36 Month Progression Free Survival Rate of Patients Receiving 4 Cycles of ABVD Versus Patients Receiving 2 Cycles of ABVD and 2 Cycles of BEACOPP and Radiation.
NCT01132807 (3) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 36-Months for Patients Who Received 4 Cycles of ABVD
NCT01132807 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01133977 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) (for Phase 2)
NCT01133977 (3) [back to overview]Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) of Lenvatinib Administered in Combination With Dacarbazine (for Phase 1b)
NCT01133977 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events/Serious Adverse Events (AEs/SAEs)
NCT01143402 (2) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (Evaluable Randomized Patients)
NCT01143402 (2) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Evaluable Randomized Patients)
NCT01152788 (4) [back to overview]Safety and Toxicity Profile (Participants With Grade 3 4 5 Adverse Event)
NCT01152788 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT01152788 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01152788 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01164007 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01164007 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) With CR or PR According to RECIST
NCT01164007 (11) [back to overview]DOR With CR, PR, or SD According to RECIST
NCT01164007 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment
NCT01164007 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression Following a Previous Assessment of CR, PR, or Stable Disease (SD) According to RECIST
NCT01164007 (11) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
NCT01164007 (11) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP) According to RECIST
NCT01164007 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression Following a Previous Assessment of CR or PR According to RECIST
NCT01164007 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression According to RECIST
NCT01164007 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT01164007 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Died
NCT01227889 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Confirmed Partial Response (PR) as Assessed by the Investigator: Randomized Phase
NCT01227889 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR or PR as Assessed by an Independent Radiologist: Randomized Phase
NCT01227889 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Non-melanoma Skin Lesions: Randomized Phase
NCT01227889 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Response as Assessed by an Independent Radiologist: Randomized Phase
NCT01227889 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Response as Assessed by the Investigator: Crossover Phase
NCT01227889 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Response as Assessed by the Investigator: Randomized Phase
NCT01227889 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01227889 (12) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by an Independent Radiologist: Randomized Phase
NCT01227889 (12) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator
NCT01227889 (12) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS2) as Assessed by the Investigator: Crossover Phase
NCT01227889 (12) [back to overview]Agreement Rate for V600E Mutation Validation of the BRAF Mutation Assay
NCT01227889 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Confirmed Partial Response (PR) as Assessed by the Investigator: Crossover Phase
NCT01327885 (4) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01327885 (4) [back to overview]Progression-Free Rate at 12 Weeks (PFR12wks)
NCT01327885 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01327885 (4) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
NCT01343277 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01343277 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT01343277 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01343277 (6) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01343277 (6) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT01343277 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01359956 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01359956 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01359956 (4) [back to overview]Treatment Related Toxicity
NCT01359956 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01390584 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT01390584 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01390584 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who Are PET Negative After Induction Treatment
NCT01390584 (5) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) Rate After Induction Treatment
NCT01390584 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival at 36 Months Among Patients Who Are PET Positive After Induction Treatment
NCT01404936 (1) [back to overview]Participants' Response
NCT01534078 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01534078 (4) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01534078 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate After One Cycle of Brentuximab
NCT01534078 (4) [back to overview]Grade III or IV Adverse Events
NCT01542255 (1) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01681212 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Surviving at 1 Year
NCT01681212 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3-4 Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs)
NCT01681212 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Died and Who Had Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Related AEs, Grade 3-4 AEs, and Related Grade 3-4 AEs
NCT01693068 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Life Assessed by Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Melanoma Trial Outcome Index (FACT-M TOI) at Day 1 of Pre-Specified Cycles and End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT01693068 (13) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation or TEAEs Leading to Death
NCT01693068 (13) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest
NCT01693068 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Life Assessed by Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Melanoma Trial Outcome Index (FACT-M TOI) at Day 1 of Pre-Specified Cycles and End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT01693068 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Life Assessed by Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Melanoma Total Score (FACT-M TS) at Day 1 of Pre-Specified Cycles and End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT01693068 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Life Assessed by Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Melanoma Total Score (FACT-M TS) at Day 1 of Pre-Specified Cycles and End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT01693068 (13) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01693068 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Progression-free Survival (PFS) at 6 Months
NCT01693068 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Overall Survival (OS) at 12 Months
NCT01693068 (13) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (DCR)
NCT01693068 (13) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01693068 (13) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01693068 (13) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Laboratory Parameter, Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Ophthalmologic Findings
NCT01704287 (10) [back to overview]Final Overall Survival (OS) By Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Expression Status - Initial Treatment Period
NCT01704287 (10) [back to overview]Final Overall Survival (OS) - Initial Treatment Period
NCT01704287 (10) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) - Initial Treatment Period
NCT01704287 (10) [back to overview]Best Overall Response (BOR) - Switch-to-Pembrolizumab Treatment Period
NCT01704287 (10) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Initial Treatment Period
NCT01704287 (10) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) - Initial Treatment Period
NCT01704287 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE) - Overall Study
NCT01704287 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event (AE) - Overall Study
NCT01704287 (10) [back to overview]Best Overall Response (BOR) - Initial Treatment Period
NCT01704287 (10) [back to overview]Interim Overall Survival (OS) - Initial Treatment Period
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Values
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]Modified Progression-free Survival (mPFS) Per Independent Review Facility (IRF)
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) Per IRF
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) Per IRF
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores by mPFS Based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at EOT
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) Per IRF
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate at the End of Randomized Regimen Per IRF
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Per IRF Rate at the End of Frontline Therapy
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]A+AVD: AUCinf: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity for Brentuximab Vedotin MMAE
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Negativity Rate Per IRF at Cycle 2
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Remission (DOCR) Per IRF
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]A+AVD: AUCinf: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity for Brentuximab Vedotin ADC and TAb
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]A+AVD: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Brentuximab Vedotin Monomethyl Auristatin E (MMAE)
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]A+AVD: Number of Participants With Antitherapeutic Antibody (ATA) and Neutralizing Antitherapeutic Antibody (nATA) Positive for Brentuximab Vedotin
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]A+AVD: Cmax: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration for Brentuximab Vedotin Antibody-drug Conjugate (ADC) and Total Antibody (TAb)
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per IRF
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01712490 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Not in CR Per IRF Who Received Subsequent Radiation After Completion of Frontline Therapy
NCT01721746 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1 Negative
NCT01721746 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1 Positive
NCT01721746 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01721746 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
NCT01721746 (7) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Baseline PD-L1 Expression
NCT01721746 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01721746 (7) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01721772 (10) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate
NCT01721772 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Extended
NCT01721772 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01721772 (10) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01721772 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival by Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Level
NCT01721772 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Rate Extended
NCT01721772 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Rate
NCT01721772 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Scores
NCT01721772 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Scores
NCT01721772 (10) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in Global Health Status Score of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30)
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Time to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Time to Response (TTR)
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (DCR)
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Duration of Objective Response (DOR)
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Ocular Events
NCT01763164 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Cardiac Events
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Partial Response Rate
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Maximal Tolerated Dose of Brentuximab Vedotin (Phase I)
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Incidence of Neurotoxicity
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Frequency of Adverse Events
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Characterization of Histologic Subtypes in HIV-HL in the HAART Era
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]CD8 Counts
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]CD4 Counts
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]Viral Load
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]2-year Overall Survival
NCT01771107 (12) [back to overview]2-year Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01835145 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Grade 3+ Adverse Events Regardless of Attribution
NCT01835145 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Without a Progression Free Survival Event at 4 Months (PFS4)
NCT01835145 (5) [back to overview]Confirmed Response Rate as Determined by the RECIST Criteria (Version 1.1)
NCT01835145 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01835145 (5) [back to overview]PFS
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Descriptive of Neuropathic Adverse Events
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]To Assess the Patient Reported Symptoms and Health-related Quality of Life in Children With High Risk HL Compared to Those Treated on the Unfavorable HOD99 Treatment Arm (UR2) at Multiple Time Points. (PedsQL v.3.0)
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]To Assess the Patient Reported Symptoms and Health-related Quality of Life in Children With High Risk HL Compared to Those Treated on the Unfavorable HOD99 Treatment Arm (UR2) at Multiple Time Points. (PedsQL v.3.0)
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]To Assess the Patient Reported Symptoms and Health-related Quality of Life in Children With High Risk HL Compared to Those Treated on the Unfavorable HOD99 Treatment Arm (UR2) at Multiple Time Points. (PedsQL v.4.0)
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Initially Enrolled Patients That Have a Complete Response at Early Response Assessment Compared to Historical Control
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Comparison of the Event-free (EFS) Survival in High Risk HL Patients Treated With AEPA/CAPDac to the Historical Control HOD99 Unfavorable Risk 2 Arm (UR2).
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate Estimate for All Evaluable Participants
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Local Failure Rate in High Risk HL Patients Treated With AEPA/CAPDac.
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Initially Enrolled Patients That Have a Complete Response at Early Response Assessment Compared to Historical Control
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Descriptive of Hematological Adverse Events
NCT01920932 (11) [back to overview]Descriptive of Infectious Adverse Events
NCT01974752 (4) [back to overview]Assessment of the Overall Survival (OS) in Patients Taking Selumetinib in Combination With Dacarbazine Compared With Those Taking Placebo in Combination With Dacarbazine
NCT01974752 (4) [back to overview]Assessment of the Efficacy of Selumetinib in Combination With Dacarbazine Compared With Placebo in Combination With Dacarbazine in Terms of Objective Response Rate (ORR) by BICR
NCT01974752 (4) [back to overview]Assessment of the Efficacy of Selumetinib in Combination With Dacarbazine Compared With Placebo in Combination With Dacarbazine Measured as Progression Free Survival (PFS) Using BICR According to RECIST 1.1.
NCT01974752 (4) [back to overview]Assessment of the Efficacy of Selumetinib in Combination With Dacarbazine Compared With Placebo in Combination With Dacarbazine in Terms of Change in Tumour Size at Week 6 by BICR
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate Based on IRRC Assessments in Cohorts A, B, and C
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Partial Remission (PR) Rate Based on IRRC Assessments in Cohorts A, B, and C
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohort D
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Select AEs in Cohort D
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Specific Thyroid Tests in Cohort D Monotherapy Phase
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants Laboratory Abnormalities in Specific Thyroid Tests in Cohort D Combination Therapy Phase
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Objective Response Rates (ORR) Based on Investigator Assessments for Cohorts A, B, and C
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRRC Assessments in Cohorts A, B, and C Extended Collection
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRRC Assessments in Cohorts A, B, and C
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Specific Liver Tests in Cohort D Monotherapy Phase
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Duration of PR Based on IRRC Assessments in Cohorts A, B, and C
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Duration of Objective Response (DOR) Based on Investigator Assessments in Cohorts A, B, and C
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Treatment Discontinuation Rate in Cohort D
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) Rate at Planned End of Therapy Based on IRRC Assessments in Cohort D
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Remission (CR) Based on IRRC Assessments for Cohorts A, B, and C
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Dose Delay in Cohort D
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Specific Liver Tests in Cohort D Combination Therapy Phase
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Duration of Objective Response Based on IRRC Assessments in Cohorts A, B, and C
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation in Cohort D
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) in Cohort D
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment Related Grade 3-5 AE in Cohort D
NCT02181738 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Died in Cohort D
NCT02288897 (6) [back to overview]Change in Domain Scores From Baseline Using the Patient Reported Skindex-16 Instrument
NCT02288897 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT02288897 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02288897 (6) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate (CRR)
NCT02288897 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT02288897 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Response (DCR)
NCT02505269 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT02505269 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade III and IV Adverse Events
NCT02505269 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT02545075 (8) [back to overview]Two-Years Survival Rate
NCT02545075 (8) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival ( PFS)
NCT02545075 (8) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Rate ( BORR )
NCT02545075 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Response ( DoR)
NCT02545075 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02545075 (8) [back to overview]One-Year Survival Rate
NCT02545075 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Stable Disease ( DoSD )
NCT02545075 (8) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate ( DCR )
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Whose Disease Was Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Negative After 2 Cycles of Protocol Therapy Per IRF Assessment
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Were Able to Complete 6 Cycles of Protocol Therapy at the Recommended Dose
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced SAEs From the First Dose of Protocol Therapy Through 30 Days After Administration of the Last Dose of Protocol Therapy
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced AEs From the First Dose of Protocol Therapy Through 30 Days After Administration of the Last Dose of Protocol Therapy
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per IRF Assessment Per IWG Criteria at EOT Visit
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Partial Remission (PR) Per IRF Assessment Per IWG Criteria at EOT Visit
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Remission (CR) Per Independent Review Facility (IRF) Assessment Per International Working Group (IWG) Criteria at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Receiving Irradiation for HL Following Study Treatment
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Recommended Dose of Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination With Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine in a Pediatric Population
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Whose Disease Was PET Positive After 6 Cycles of Protocol Therapy Per IRF Assessment
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Whose Disease Was PET Negative After 2 Cycles of Protocol Therapy Per IRF Assessment
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) From the First Dose of Protocol Therapy Through 30 Days After Administration of the Last Dose of Protocol Therapy
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs) From the First Dose of Protocol Therapy Through 30 Days After Administration of the Last Dose of Protocol Therapy
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an ORR Per IRF Assessment Per IWG Criteria at EOT Visit
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PR Per IRF Assessment Per IWG Criteria at EOT Visit
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a CR Per IRF Assessment Per IWG Criteria at EOT Visit
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Number of ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants With AEs and SAEs
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline Total Immunoglobulin at EOT
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline Poliovirus Antibodies Ratio at EOT
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in Total Lymphocyte Count at EOT
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in the Percentage of CD8+ (CD8+CD45RA-CD197- and CD8+CD45RA-CD197+) Subset of Cells at EOT
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in the Percentage of CD4+ (CD4+CD45RA-CD197- and CD4+CD45RA+CD197+) Subset of Cells at EOT
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in Tetanus at EOT
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in Peripheral Blood CD34+A at EOT
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin M at the End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin A at EOT
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Were ATA Positive, Persistently Positive, or Transiently Positive, and nATA Positive
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in Haemophilus Influenzae B Antibody, IgG at EOT
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline Immunoglobulin G Levels at End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Percentage of Participants With Low and High ATA Titer Values
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Who Were Antitherapeutic Antibody (ATA) Positive, Persistently Positive or Transiently Positive, and Neutralizing Antitherapeutic Antibody (nATA) Positive
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving CR Per IRF Assessment Per IWG Criteria in ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Median Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of MMAE in Plasma
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Low and High ATA Titer Values
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Time to Onset and Resolution for All Peripheral Neuropathy Events
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving CR Per IRF Assessment Per IWG Criteria in ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Median Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of Brentuximab Vedotin and TAb in Serum
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Mean Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Brentuximab Vedotin Total Conjugated and Therapeutic Antibody (TAb)
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Mean Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Monomethyl Auristatin E (MMAE)
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Number of ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants With AEs and SAEs
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Peripheral Neuropathy, Regardless of Seriousness, From the First Dose of Protocol Therapy
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Median Tmax of MMAE in Plasma
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Median Tmax of Brentuximab Vedotin and TAb in Serum
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Mean Serum Cmax of Brentuximab Vedotin and TAb
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Mean Serum AUC0-15d of Brentuximab Vedotin and TAb
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Mean AUC 0-15 of Brentuximab Vedotin in ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Mean Cmax of Brentuximab Vedotin in ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Mean AUC 0-15d of Brentuximab Vedotin in ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Mean Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Day 0 to Day 15 (AUC0-15) of Brentuximab Vedotin and TAb
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 1: Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Day 0 to Day 15 (AUC0-15) of MMAE
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Mean Plasma Cmax of MMAE
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Mean Plasma AUC0-15 of MMAE
NCT02979522 (57) [back to overview]Phase 2: Mean Cmax of Brentuximab Vedotin in ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants
NCT03070392 (7) [back to overview]Quality-of-Life: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status
NCT03070392 (7) [back to overview]Quality-of-Life: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D,5L Domain Scores
NCT03070392 (7) [back to overview]Safety: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT03070392 (7) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Tebentafusp Concentration
NCT03070392 (7) [back to overview]Efficacy: Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03070392 (7) [back to overview]Efficacy: Overall Survival
NCT03070392 (7) [back to overview]Quality-of-life: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
NCT03226249 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) With Pembrolizumab Treatment Alone
NCT03226249 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival at Treatment Completion
NCT03226249 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Treatment Completion
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Subsequent Anticancer Therapy Utilization Rate (Part A)
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Relative Dose Intensity (Part A)
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Rate of Dose Reduction and Delays: Vinblastine (Part A)
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Rate of Dose Reduction and Delays: Doxorubicin (Part A)
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Rate of Dose Reduction and Delays: Dacarbazine (Part A)
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Rate of Dose Reduction and Delays: Brentuximab Vedotin (Part A)
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Incidence of Laboratory Abnormalities (Parts B and C)
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Febrile Neutropenia (FN) Rate (Part A)
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Actual Dose Intensity: Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine (Part A)
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Primary Refractory Disease Rate (Part A)
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Physician-reported Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Part A)
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) at EOT (Parts B and C)
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate (Part A)
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) Rate (Parts B and C)
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Actual Dose Intensity: Brentuximab Vedotin (Part A)
NCT03646123 (16) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events (Parts B and C)

Failure-free Survival at 5 Years

"Failure-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to the earlier of progression/relapse or death. The 5-year failure-free survival is the probability a patient is failure-free and survives 5 years.~Progression is defined as an increase in size of 25% of the sum of the products of the pretreatment measurements or appearance of new lesions. Significant enlargement of the liver or spleen is evidence of progression. A significant increase in size is defined as > 2.0 cm in distance between costal margin and the inferior margin of either organ.~Relapse is defined as the re-appearance of any clinical evidence of Hodgkin's disease in a patient who has had a complete response. Relapse for partial responders is defined as progressive disease relative to disease status during the partial remission." (NCT00003389)
Timeframe: Assessed every 2 months if patient is < 1 year from study entry, every 3 months for the second year, every 4 months for the third year, every 6 months for years 4 and 5

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Arm A (ABVD)0.74
Arm B (Stanford V)0.71

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or last known alive. The 5-year survival rate is the probability a patient survives 5 years. (NCT00003389)
Timeframe: Assessed every 2 months if patient is < 1 year from study entry, every 3 months for the second year, every 4 months for the third year, every 6 months for years 4 and 5, and yearly for 5 years

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Arm A (ABVD)0.88
Arm B (Stanford V)0.88

[back to top]

Incidence of Second Cancers

Number of patients who developed second primary cancers (NCT00003389)
Timeframe: Assessed every 2 months if patient is < 1 year from study entry, every 3 months for the second year, every 4 months for the third year, every 6 months for years 4 and 5, and yearly for 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm A (ABVD)15
Arm B (Stanford V)19

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival

Overall survival was measured from the date of registration to study until death from any cause with observations censored at the date of last contact for patients last known to be alive. (NCT00006237)
Timeframe: Every three months for a year, every six months for years 2-5, annual for years 5-10

InterventionPercent of population (Number)
Interferon56
Biochemotherapy56

[back to top]

5-year Relapse-Free Survival

Measured from date of registration to date of first observation of progressive disease or death due to any cause. (NCT00006237)
Timeframe: Every three months for the first year, every 6 months for years 2-5, annually for years 6-10

InterventionPercentage of population (Number)
Interferon47
Biochemotherapy38

[back to top]

Toxicity

Number of patients with Grade 3-5 adverse events that are related to study drug by given type of adverse event (NCT00006237)
Timeframe: While on treatment, patients on the HDIFN arm were assessed weekly for the 1st month, then every 2 weeks for the 2nd month, then every 3 months therafter; patients on the biochemo arm were assessed daily for the 1st 5 days, then weekly thereafter.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Abdominal pain/crampingAcidosisAcute vascular leak syndromeAlkaline phosphatase increaseAllergic reactionAnal incontinenceAnemiaAnorexiaAnxiety/agitationApneaArrhythmia, NOSArthralgiaBilirubin increaseBone painCPK increaseCardiovascular-otherCatheter related infectionCerebrovascular ischemiaColitisConfusionConstipation/bowel obstructionCranial neuropathyCreatinine increaseDehydrationDelusionsDepressionDiarrhea without colostomyDizziness/light headednessDizziness/vertigo, NOSDouble visionDyspneaEryth/rash/eruption/desq, NOSEsophagitis/dysphagiaEye-otherFatigue/malaise/lethargyFebrile neutropeniaFever without neutropeniaFever, NOSHallucinationsHeadacheHemorrhage w/ 3-4 thrombocytHyperglycemiaHyperkalemiaHypermagnesemiaHypertensionHypertriglyceridemiaHypocalcemiaHypokalemiaHypomagnesemiaHyponatremiaHypophosphatemiaHypotensionHypoxiaInfection w/o 3-4 neutropeniaInfection with 3-4 neutropeniaInfection, unk ANCInsomniaLeukopeniaLipase increaseLocal injection site reactionLymphopeniaMood/consciousness change, NOSMuscle weakness (not neuro)MyalgiaNauseaNeutropenia/granulocytopeniaPRBC transfusionPancreatitisPersonality/behavioral changePetechiae/purpuraPlatelet transfusionPruritusRash/desquamationRenal failureReportable adverse event, NOSRespiratory infect w/ neutropRigors/chillsSGOT (AST) increaseSGPT (ALT) increaseSeizuresSensory neuropathyStomatitis/pharyngitisSurgery-wound infectionSyncopeThrombocytopeniaThrombosis/embolismTyphlitisVertigoVomitingWeakness (motor neuropathy)Weight loss
Biochemotherapy1113018950031410202340471461112320229511513111018756416139213820211451613101531011217822100501103720
Interferon10001001412400010102010101422001101381101902010101000000011121100071025001001401021832000321101913

[back to top]

Treatment Delivery With Compliance Defined as Receiving at Least 95% of the Pre-operative Protocol Dose of RT, All 3 Cycles of MAID (if Applicable), and Receive Thalidomide on 75% of the Days During Radiation

Was to be estimated using a binomial distribution and accompanied by the associated 95% confidence interval. Due to early study closure, this endpoint could not be fully evaluated per the protocol plan. (NCT00089544)
Timeframe: Duration of treatment (which can continue up to approximately 15 months).

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Not CompliantCompliant
Cohort A (Chemotherapy, Radiation, Thalidomide, Surgery)510
Cohort B (Thalidomide, Radiation, Surgery)25

[back to top]

Duration of Objective Response

Duration of objective response was measured from the time the criteria were met for complete response or partial response to the first date that recurrent or progressive disease was objectively documented. (NCT00091572)
Timeframe: Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Temozolomide4.34
Dacarbazine8.31

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate in Subjects With Measurable Lesions

Based on investigator's assessment of response in subjects with measurable lesions. Objective response = complete response + partial response. Complete response = disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response = at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. (NCT00091572)
Timeframe: Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

InterventionRatio (Median)
Temozolomide0.14
Dacarbazine0.10

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. (NCT00091572)
Timeframe: The final analysis was to be performed when at least 616 deaths had occurred.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Temozolomide9.13
Dacarbazine9.36

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or the date of death regardless of the cause. (NCT00091572)
Timeframe: Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients will be followed for survival.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Temozolomide2.30
Dacarbazine2.17

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Tumor Response Categories

Tumor response was defined as the best response (confirmed complete response [CR], partial response [PR], stable disease [SD], or progressive disease [PD]) assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter [SLD] of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. SD: Does not qualify for CR or PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. (NCT00110994)
Timeframe: Every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRPRSDPDNot Evaluated
Placebo + Dacarbazine0622211
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine01224150

[back to top]

Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to the Visit When the Best Tumor Response Was Noted

Change in ECOG PS is defined as an improvement (increase) or worsening (decrease) of at least one grade from the baseline ECOG score (from 0 [fully active] to 5 [dead]). Change in ECOG PS was recorded at the visit at which best confirmed response (BCR) using the modified RECIST (PR, CR, stable disease or Progressive Disease (PD)) was first noted (the change was 7% for both Sorafenib and Placebo). The BCR is the BCR recorded from the start of the treatment until DP/recurrence (taking as reference for DP, the smallest measurements recorded since treatment started). (NCT00110994)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
missingbetterno changeworse
Placebo + Dacarbazine123413
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine113415

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was calculated as the time (days) from date of randomization to date of first observed disease progression (per modified RECIST or clinical judgment, whichever was earlier: CR, PR, stable disease, progressive disease). The actual dates of tumor assessments were used for this calculation. TTP for subjects without disease progression at the time of analysis, including subjects with death prior to progression, was censored at the last date of tumor evaluation. TTP for subjects who had no tumor assessments after baseline was censored at 1 day. (NCT00110994)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to documented tumor progression (median time of 148 days)

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine148
Placebo + Dacarbazine82

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was calculated as the time (days) from date of randomization to date of first observed DP (per modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors [RECIST] or clinical judgment, whichever was earlier: CR, PR, stable disease, progressive disease) or death due to any cause, if death occurred before progression was documented. The actual date of tumor assessments was used for this calculation. PFS for subjects without progression or death was censored at the last date of tumor evaluation. PFS for subjects who had no tumor assessments after baseline and did not die was censored at 1 day. (NCT00110994)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to documented tumor progression or death (the maximum treatment duration of 71.1 weeks)

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine148
Placebo + Dacarbazine82

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival (OS) was calculated as the number of days from date of randomization to death date. Subjects who had not died at the time of analysis were censored at their last contact date. (NCT00110994)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to death (the maximum treatment duration of 71.1 weeks)

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine319
Placebo + Dacarbazine359

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented objective response of Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter [SLD] of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD or better) or Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions), whichever was noted earlier, to disease progression or death (if death occurred before progression was documented). Duration of response for subjects who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. (NCT00110994)
Timeframe: Time from initial response to documented tumor progression or death (median time of 188 days)

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine188
Placebo + Dacarbazine161

[back to top]

Change of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score From Baseline to the Visit at Which Best Response Was First Noted

European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) is a self-administered test that records the respondents' self-rated health status on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Responders specify their scales by indicating a position along a continuous line between 0 and 100. (NCT00110994)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine0.558
Placebo + Dacarbazine-4.425

[back to top]

Change of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score From Baseline to the End of Treatment

European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) is a self-administered test that records the respondents' self-rated health status on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Responders specify their scales by indicating a position along a continuous line between 0 and 100. (NCT00110994)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine-2.00
Placebo + Dacarbazine-8.146

[back to top]

Change of European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index Score From Baseline to the End of Treatment

European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) is a self-administered questionnaire developed to measure health status across 5 dimensions: Mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels of response: No problem (1), some problems (2), and extreme problems (3). The five dimensions are summarized into a single score, the EQ-5D index score, which ranges between 0 and 1, with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state or death and 1 representing perfect health. (NCT00110994)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine-0.015
Placebo + Dacarbazine-0.019

[back to top]

Change of European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index Score From Baseline to the Visit at Which Best Response Was First Noted

European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) is a self-administered questionnaire developed to measure health status across 5 dimensions: Mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels of response: No problem (1), some problems (2), and extreme problems (3). The five dimensions are summarized into a single score, the EQ-5D index score, which ranges between 0 and 1, with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state or death and 1 representing perfect health. (NCT00110994)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine-0.004
Placebo + Dacarbazine-0.008

[back to top]

Duration of Response

time from commencement to radiological evidence of progression (NCT00130442)
Timeframe: At screening and in week 3 of every second cycle up to the end of cycle 6 and every third cycle after cycle 6. Each cycle was 21 days. Assessed from date of randomization until the date of first documented progression, up to 50 months.

Interventiondays (Mean)
Arm 1- PI-88 Plus Dacarbazine117.0
Arm 2- Dacarbazine Alone140.6

[back to top]

Non-progression Rate

The Proportion of Patients With Objective Response or Stable Disease (Non-progression Rate) after 2 or 4 treatment cycles (NCT00130442)
Timeframe: In week 3 of every second cycle (each cycle was 21 days) for all subjects enrolled in cycle 2 and cycle 4.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
End of cycle 2_Non-progressedEnd of cycle 2_progressedEnd of cycle 4_Non-progressedEnd of cycle 4_progressed
Arm 1- PI-88 Plus Dacarbazine33322441
Arm 2- Dacarbazine Alone35303133

[back to top]

Time to Progression

treatment was to continue until the subject experienced disease progression. (NCT00130442)
Timeframe: At screening and in week 3 of every second cycle up to the end of cycle 6 and every third cycle after cycle 6 . Each cycle was 21 days.Assessed from date of randomization until the date of first documented progression, up to 50 months.

Interventiondays (Median)
Arm 1- PI-88 Plus Dacarbazine66
Arm 2- Dacarbazine Alone82

[back to top]

Survival

time to death and also at time-points 6 month and 12 months (NCT00130442)
Timeframe: It was to assess time to death. The time frame is at least 6th month, 12th month and data was continuously collected till the end of the study, up to 50 months..

Interventiondays (Median)
Arm 1- PI-88 Plus Dacarbazine304.00
Arm 2- Dacarbazine Alone416.00

[back to top]

Total Clearance (CL) of Intetumumab After Intravenous Administration - Phase 1 (Part 1)

The CL is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion, post-infusion at 2, 4, 8, 24 hour, Day 8, Day 15, post-last dose (3 weeks or 1 week) and 3 months post-last dose

InterventionmL/day/kg (Mean)
Intetumumab 3 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]11.85
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]9.96
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]6.79

[back to top]

Time to Worsening in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status - Phase 2

Eastern Cooperative Oncology (ECOG) performance status: Participants will be graded from 0 (Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction) to 4 (Completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair). Worsening in ECOG score was defined as ≥ 1 point increase in ECOG score from baseline. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Baseline (within 7 days of first infusion of study medication), Day 1 of all 8 cycles, 3 weeks or 1 week post-last dose, 3 months and 6 months post-last dose of study medication

InterventionDays (Median)
Dacarbazine + Placebo [Phase 2]135.0
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 2]226.0
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]194.0
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]170.0

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) - Phase 2

The PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of initial documented progressive disease (PD), or the date of initial documented symptomatic deterioration, or the date of death, whichever occurred first. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to date of initial documented progressive disease or death, whichever occured first, as assessed upto 6 months after last dose of study medication

InterventionDays (Median)
Dacarbazine + Placebo [Phase 2]54.0
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 2]42.0
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]42.0
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]75.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Stable Disease (SD) - Phase 2

The SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progressive disease (PD), taking as a reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started. The participants who achieved SD as the best response were reported. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Screening, within 1 week of the end of Cycles 2, 4, 6, 8 (but prior to the next cycle dose), and follow-up (3 and 6 months post-last dose where applicable)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Dacarbazine + Placebo [Phase 2]32.3
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 2]25.8
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]24.2
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]53.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CR - Phase 2

The CR: complete disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable target lesions. The participants who achieved CR as the best response were reported. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Screening, within 1 week of the end of Cycles 2, 4, 6, 8 (but prior to the next cycle dose), and follow-up (3 and 6 months post-last dose where applicable)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Dacarbazine + Placebo [Phase 2]0
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 2]0
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]0
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Best Overall Tumor Response as Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) - Phase 2

The CR: complete disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable target lesions and PR: 50 percent (%) or more decrease in sum of the longest diameters of target lesion(s), with at least stable disease (SD) in all other evaluable disease in the absence of treatment failure. The best response achieved among all the evaluated time points was reported. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Screening, within 1 week of the end of Cycles 2, 4, 6, 8 (but prior to the next cycle dose), and follow-up (3 and 6 months post-last dose where applicable)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Dacarbazine + Placebo [Phase 2]9.7
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 2]0
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]6.1
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]3.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Best Overall Response as CR, PR, or SD - Phase 2

The CR: complete disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable target lesions and PR: 50% or more decrease in sum of the longest diameters of target lesion(s), with at least stable disease (SD) in all other evaluable disease in the absence of treatment failure. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Within 28 days of first infusion of study medication, within 1 week of the end of Cycles 2, 4, 6, 8; 3 months and 6 months post-last dose of study medication

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Dacarbazine + Placebo [Phase 2]41.9
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 2]25.8
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]30.3
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]56.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) - Phase 2

The OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause and was to be censored at the date that the subject is last known to be alive. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Every 3 months until death, until lost to follow-up, until withdrawal of consent, or until the Sponsor ends the study, as assessed up to 6 months post-last dose of study medication

InterventionDays (Median)
Dacarbazine + Placebo [Phase 2]233.0
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 2]298.0
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]426.0
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]333.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) - Phase 1

The DLT is defined as any Grade 3 or higher adverse event identified by the safety data monitoring committee as attributable to intetumumab except for hypersensitivity reactions, which are not considered DLTs unless there are 2 or more occurrences of greater than or equal to Grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction within a group. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Up to 21 days post-first infusion from the last treated participant in Phase 1

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Intetumumab 3 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]0
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]0
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]0
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 2)]0
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 2)]0

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Intetumumab - Phase 2

The maximum observed analyte concentration in serum was reported. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion, post-infusion at 2, 4, 8, 24 hour, Day 8, Day 15, post-last dose (3 weeks or 1 week) and 3 months post-last dose

Interventionmcg/mL (Mean)
Dacarbazine + Placebo [Phase 2]NA
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 2]131.18
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]240.81
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]219.47

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 2)

The maximum observed analyte concentration in serum was reported. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion, post-infusion at 2, 4, 8, 24 hour, Day 8, Day 15, post-last dose (3 weeks or 1 week) and 3 months post-last dose

InterventionMicrogram per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Mean)
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 2)]118.47
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 2)]220.87

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 1)

The maximum observed analyte concentration in serum was reported. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion, post-infusion at 2, 4, 8, 24 hour, Day 8, Day 15, post-last dose (3 weeks or 1 week) and 3 months post-last dose

InterventionMicrogram per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Mean)
Intetumumab 3 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]94.44
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]199.45
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]306.86

[back to top]

Half-life of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 2)

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration of the drug to decrease by one half. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion, post-infusion at 2, 4, 8, 24 hour, Day 8, Day 15, post-last dose (3 weeks or 1 week) and 3 months post-last dose

InterventionDays (Mean)
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 2)]2.41
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 2)]2.36

[back to top]

Half-life of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 1)

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration of the drug to decrease by one half. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion, post-infusion at 2, 4, 8, 24 hour, Day 8, Day 15, post-last dose (3 weeks or 1 week) and 3 months post-last dose

InterventionDays (Mean)
Intetumumab 3 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]2.03
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]2.13
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]5.33

[back to top]

Area Under the Serum Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 2)

The AUC is a measure of the serum concentration of the drug over time. It is used to characterize drug absorption. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion, post-infusion at 2, 4, 8, 24 hour, Day 8, Day 15, post-last dose (3 weeks or 1 week) and 3 months post-last dose

Interventionmcg*day/mL (Mean)
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 2)]368.74
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 2)]963.17

[back to top]

Area Under the Serum Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 1)

The AUC is a measure of the serum concentration of the drug over time. It is used to characterize drug absorption. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion, post-infusion at 2, 4, 8, 24 hour, Day 8, Day 15, post-last dose (3 weeks or 1 week) and 3 months post-last dose

Interventionmcg*day/mL (Mean)
Intetumumab 3 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]257.55
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]503.71
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]1479.07

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Between Zero to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 1)

The AUCinf = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞). (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion, post-infusion at 2, 4, 8, 24 hour, Day 8, Day 15, post-last dose (3 weeks or 1 week) and 3 months post-last dose

Interventionmcg*day/mL (Mean)
Intetumumab 3 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]257.80
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]503.88
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]1591.54

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma Subscale (FACT-MS) Score - Phase 2

The FACT-MS subscale is used to evaluate health related quality of life. It consists of 16 items: 12 items related to physical well-being, 3 to emotional well-being and 1 to social well-being. Scores for all items will range from 0 to 4. Total score ranges from 0-64; higher score indicates a more positive quality of life. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Day 1 (pre-dose) of Cycles 1, 2, 3; and final visit (3 weeks post-last dose of study medication)

,,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (Cycle 1) (n=23, 24, 26, 26)Change at Cycle 2 (pre-dose) (n=20, 24, 22, 23)Change at Cycle 3 (pre-dose) (n = 19, 11, 5, 14)Change at final visit (n = 15, 20, 20, 17)
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]53.3-2.0-0.1-3.2
Dacarbazine + Placebo [Phase 2]53.8-2.2-2.6-5.7
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]55.3-2.90.2-2.2
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 2]55.6-1.9-1.3-5.5

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution (Vz) of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 1)

Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion, post-infusion at 2, 4, 8, 24 hour, Day 8, Day 15, post-last dose (3 weeks or 1 week) and 3 months post-last dose

InterventionmL/kg (Mean)
Intetumumab 3 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]34.69
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]30.63
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 1)]50.80

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Score - Phase 2

The BPI questionnaire is used to evaluate heath related quality of life. BPI allows participants to rate the severity of their pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Day 1 (pre-dose) of Cycles 1, 2, 3; and final visit (3 weeks post-last dose of study medication)

,,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (Cycle 1) (n=23, 23, 27, 25)Change at Cycle 2 (pre-dose) (n=20, 22, 22, 22)Change at Cycle 3 (pre-dose) (n = 19, 10, 6, 14)Change at final visit (n = 15, 20, 20, 16)
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]2.2-0.3-0.80.3
Dacarbazine + Placebo [Phase 2]1.30.90.51.4
Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 2]0.90.50.01.0
Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 2]2.00.00.50.8

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution (Vz) of Intetumumab - Phase 1 (Part 2)

Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion, post-infusion at 2, 4, 8, 24 hour, Day 8, Day 15, post-last dose (3 weeks or 1 week) and 3 months post-last dose

InterventionmL/kg (Mean)
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 2)]47.38
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 2)]35.18

[back to top]

Total Clearance (CL) of Intetumumab After Intravenous Administration - Phase 1 (Part 2)

The CL is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body. (NCT00246012)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion, post-infusion at 2, 4, 8, 24 hour, Day 8, Day 15, post-last dose (3 weeks or 1 week) and 3 months post-last dose

InterventionmL/day/kg (Mean)
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 5 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 2)]13.44
Dacarbazine + Intetumumab 10 mg/kg [Phase 1 (Part 2)]10.34

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Survival Rate at 1 Year, 18 Months, 2 Years, and 3 Years

The survival rate (percentage of participants alive) was defined as the probability that a participant is alive at 1 year (or 18 months, 2 years, or 3 years) following randomization and was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00324155)
Timeframe: Date of randomization to 3 years following randomization

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
At 1 yearAt 18 monthsAt 2 yearsAt 3 years
Ipilimumab and Dacarbazine47.335.628.520.8
Placebo and Dacarbazine36.326.117.912.2

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate Truncated at Week 12

PFS rate=probability patient was progression-free at Day 78, calculated as total patients receiving treatment and with an overall response of stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), or complete response (CR) at Week 12, divided by total patients. For those alive and not progressed at or before Week 12, PFS censored on date of last evaluable tumor assessment (TA) at or before Week 12. Those with an assessment of PD prior to Week 12 and subsequent assessment of SD, PR, or CR at Week 12 were called progression-free at Week 12. Those with no recorded postbaseline TA dated on or before Day 109, and who had not died on or before Day 109, were censored at randomization. PD=at least 25% increase in sum of products of all index lesions or appearance of any new lesions. Both an investigator and independent review committee (IRC) assessed radiologic imaging studies, photographs of skin lesions, and clinical data. IRC assessment was considered primary over that of the investigators. (NCT00324155)
Timeframe: Day 78

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
PFS rate at Week 12 by IRCPFS rate at Week 12 by Investigator
Ipilimumab and Dacarbazine55.458.5
Placebo and Dacarbazine50.754.0

[back to top] [back to top]

Median Number of Months of Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS=time between randomization and date of progression or death, whichever occurs first. Participants who died without reported prior progression were considered to have progressed on date of death. For those alive and not progressed, PFS was censored on date of last evaluable tumor assessment (TA). Those who have not died and have no recorded postbaseline TA were censored at randomization. Those who died without any recorded postbaseline TA were considered to have progressed on date of death. Evaluation was conducted by both investigator and an independent review committee (IRC), who assessed radiologic imaging studies, photographs of skin lesions, and clinical data. Progressive disease defined using modified criteria of the World Health Organization: demonstration of at least a 25% increase in the sum of products of all index lesions or the appearance of any new lesions. For nonindex lesions: appearance of any new lesions or unequivocal progression of nonindex lesions. (NCT00324155)
Timeframe: Randomization to date of progression or death to approximately 5 years

,
InterventionMonths (Median)
PFS per IRCPFS per investigator
Ipilimumab and Dacarbazine2.762.73
Placebo and Dacarbazine2.602.63

[back to top]

Duration of Stable Disease (SD): Randomized Participants With Stable Disease

Duration of SD was defined in those whose Best Overall Response (BOR) was SD, per independent review committee (IRC) as the time between Week 12 and date of progressive disease (PD) or death , whichever occurs first. For those who underwent tumor resection following Week 12 but prior to PD, duration of SD was censored on date of last evaluable tumor assessment (TA) prior to resection. For those with BOR of SD at Week 12, date of PD was used in analysis of duration of SD. For those with BOR=SD who have not subsequently progressed and who remain alive, duration of SD censored on date of last evaluable TA. Modified criteria of the World Health Organization (mWHO): SD=insufficient decrease to qualify for partial response or sufficient increase to qualify for PD; PD=an increase of 25% or more in sum of products of longest diameter and greatest perpendicular diameter of index lesions compared with smallest recorded sum, or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. (NCT00324155)
Timeframe: Week 12 to date of disease progression or death up to data cutoff for primary endpoint (approximately 5 years)

,
InterventionMonths (Median)
Duration of SD by mWHO criteria(n=45, 50)Duration of SD by IRC criteria (n=45, 57)
Ipilimumab and Dacarbazine4.74.8
Placebo and Dacarbazine4.63.4

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR): Randomized Participants With Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)

DOR defined in those with Best Overall Response (BOR)=CR or PR per independent review committee (IRC) as time between date of response of confirmed CR or PR, whichever occurred first, and date of PD or death. If PR assessed before CR, DOR confirmed at earlier time-point showing PR. Modified criteria of the World Health Organization (mWHO): CR=disappearance of all lesions;no evidence of PD; PR=50% or greater decrease in the sum of products of longest and greatest perpendicular diameters (SPD) of all index lesions compared with baseline. PD=an increase of 25% or greater in SPD of index lesions compared with the smallest recorded sum, or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Immune-related response criteria (irRC): SD=50% decrease in total measurable tumor burden compared with peak cannot be established nor 25% increase compared with nadir, in absence of unequivocal progression of nonindex lesions. Unconfirmed immune-related (ir) CR, irPR, or irPD=irSD. (NCT00324155)
Timeframe: Day of CR or PR to day of PD or death up to data cutoff for primary endpoint (approximately 5 years)

,
InterventionMonths (Median)
Using mWHO criteria (n=38, 26)Using irRC criteria (n=42, 28)
Ipilimumab and Dacarbazine19.321.1
Placebo and Dacarbazine8.110.2

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Rate (BORR)

BORR=number with Best Overall Response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), divided by total number of randomized patients. BOR=date of first dose to the last tumor assessment prior to subsequent cancer therapy (including tumor resection surgery but excluding palliative local radiotherapy for bone lesions). Independent review committee assessment. Modified criteria of the World Health Organization (mWHO): CR=disappearance of all lesions; no evidence of progressive disease; PR=50% or greater decrease in the sum of products of the longest diameter and greatest perpendicular diameter of all index lesions compared with baseline. Immune-related (ir) response criteria (irRC) assess tumor response in patients on immunotherapy: irCR=disappearance of all lesions in 2 consecutive observations at least 4 weeks apart; irPR=50% or greater decrease in total measureable tumor burden compared with peak in 2 observations at least 4 weeks apart. (NCT00324155)
Timeframe: First dose to last tumor assessment at data cutoff for primary endpoint (approximately 5 years)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
BORR by mWHO criteriaBORR by irRC
Ipilimumab and Dacarbazine15.216.8
Placebo and Dacarbazine10.311.1

[back to top]

Time to Response: All Randomized Participants With Response to Treatment

Time to response was defined as the time between the first dose of study therapy and the date when measurement criteria were met for Best Overall Response (BOR) of partial response (PR) or complete response (CR), whichever occurred first, per independent review committee. Note that if an overall response of PR occurred before confirmation of CR, the time to response endpoint was not determined by the time that the BOR of CR was shown but rather by the earlier time point showing PR. Modified criteria of the World Health Organization: CR=disappearance of all lesions; no evidence of progressive disease (PD); PR=50% or more decrease in the sum of products of the longest and greatest perpendicular diameters (SPD) of all index lesions compared with baseline; PD=an increase of 25% or greater in the SPD of index lesions compared with the smallest recorded sum, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. (NCT00324155)
Timeframe: First dose to date of BOR up to data cutoff for primary endpoint (approximately 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ipilimumab and Dacarbazine2.6
Placebo and Dacarbazine2.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Brain Metastasis-Free Survival at Time of Data Cutoff

Brain metastasis-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the date of progression with a new lesion located in the brain. New brain lesions prior to Week 12 constituted a progression event (unlike main progression-free survival analysis). A participant who dies without documentation of a brain lesion was considered to have progressed with brain metastasis on the date of death. Participants who are free of brain metastasis were censored on the date of their last tumor assessment. An independent review committee evaluated images of participants with clinical symptoms to determine the number of those free of brain metastasis. The brain metastasis-free status was reported as a percent of participants (n/N), where n= participants with metastasis-free brains at data cutoff for the Primary Endpoint and N= randomized participants. A 2-sided Clopper and Pearson confidence interval was performed. (NCT00324155)
Timeframe: Date of randomization up to data cutoff for primary endpoint (approximately 5 years)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ipilimumab and Dacarbazine93.6
Placebo and Dacarbazine90.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death. Analysis of OS was to be done once 416 deaths had occurred (primary endpoint). However, analysis occurred at 414 deaths (February 7, 2011), due to operational timing of the study. Median number of months of OS and associated confidence interval calculated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT00324155)
Timeframe: Date of randomization to 37 months through 5-year follow-up and up to approximately 76 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ipilimumab and Dacarbazine11.17
Placebo and Dacarbazine9.07

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR=number whose best overall response (BOR) was partial response (PR), complete response (CR) or stable disease (SD), divided by all randomized participants (unevaluable participants included). Independent review committee assessment. BOR=date of first dose to last tumor assessment prior to subsequent cancer therapy (including tumor resection, excluding palliative local radiotherapy). Modified World Health Organization criteria: CR=disappearance of all lesions; no evidence of progressive disease (PD); PR=50% or more decrease in the sum of products of the longest diameter and greatest perpendicular diameter of all index lesions compared with baseline; SD=neither sufficient decrease to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD; PD=at least 25% increase in sum of products of all index lesions and/or appearance of any new lesions; nonindex lesions: appearance of any new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of nonindex lesions. (NCT00324155)
Timeframe: First dose to last tumor assessment prior to subsequent therapy at data cutoff for Primary Endpoint (approximately 5 years)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ipilimumab and Dacarbazine33.2
Placebo and Dacarbazine30.2

[back to top]

Effect of Rituximab on EBV(+) Tumors

Number of relapses among participants who had tumors positive for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). (NCT00369681)
Timeframe: Up to 56 months

Interventionrelapses (Number)
R-ABVD0

[back to top]

Relationship Between Marker Detection and Clinical Outcome

Number of relapses for participants who did and did not have re-emergence of clonal CD27(+) ALDH(+) B cells after completing study intervention. (NCT00369681)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionrelapses (Number)
No re-emergence of cloneRe-emergence of clone
R-ABVD02

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Percentage of participants who did not experience death, relapse, or progression (worsening) of their lymphoma. (NCT00369681)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
R-ABVD83

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Progression-free Survival at Specific Time-points

Progression-free Survival (PFS) was the time from the first dose of combination therapy to disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever is earlier) or death (if death occurs before progression is documented). PFS for subjects without tumor progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor evaluation. (NCT00492297)
Timeframe: from start of treatment until progression or death before progression after 3, 6 and 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PFS at month 3PFS at month 6PFS at month 12
Sorafenib + Dacarbazine56.6333.7310.84

[back to top]

Overall Best Response

Best Overall Response (BOR): Best tumor response achieved during or within 30 days after active therapy confirmed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete response (CR): The disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Partial response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. SD was defined as steady state of disease, PD was defined as an increase of at least 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or appearance of new lesions. (NCT00492297)
Timeframe: during or within 30 days after active therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Overall response (CR+PR)Complete response (CR)Partial response (PR)Stable disease (SD)Progressive disease (PD)
Sorafenib + Dacarbazine10193134

[back to top]

Disease Control (DC)

DC was defined as the total number of subjects whose best response was not progressive disease (PD) (total number of CRs + total number of PRs + total number of Stable Diseases (SD)). The DC at specific time points could also be calculated as the total number of subjects whose response was not PD at that time point. (NCT00492297)
Timeframe: after start of treatment, at 6 months and 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
DC based on overall best responseDC at 6 monthsDC at 12 months
Sorafenib + Dacarbazine413838

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to Response in subjects who achieved an objective response (PR or CR with confirmation) was measured from the date of starting study combination treatment until the earliest date that the response was first documented. (NCT00492297)
Timeframe: start of therapy to confirmed CR or PR (median 259 days)

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib + Dacarbazine48

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Time to Progression was the number of days from the start of therapy to progression (if patient progressed then censored=no) or to the last observation at which the patient was known to have not progressed, that is, the last observation with a best response of CR, PR, or SD. (NCT00492297)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until progression (median 259 days)

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib + Dacarbazine102

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free Survival (PFS) was the time from the first dose of combination therapy to disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever is earlier) or death (if death occurs before progression is documented). PFS for subjects without tumor progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor evaluation. (NCT00492297)
Timeframe: from start of treatment until progression or death before progression (median 259 days)

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib + Dacarbazine102

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Response

Duration of complete response was the number of days from the date that a complete response was first documented to the date that recurrent or progressive disease was first objectively documented (if patient progressed then censored=no) or to last observation (if patient did not progress then censored=yes). (NCT00492297)
Timeframe: from confirmed CR until PD (median 259 days)

Interventiondays (Number)
Sorafenib + Dacarbazine420

[back to top]

Duration of Stable Disease

Duration of Stable Disease (DSD), defined as the time from the first documented objective evidence of Stable Disease (SD) to disease progression (DP) or death if death occurred before DP, was assessed in subjects who showed SD as best response. DSD for subjects who had not progressed or died was censored at the date of last tumor assessment. (NCT00492297)
Timeframe: from start of therapy to PD, only in non-responders (median 259 days)

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib + Dacarbazine93

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of Response was assessed in subjects who showed a Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR). It was defined as the time from the first documented objective response to Progressive Disease (PD), or death if before documented progression. Duration of response for subjects who have not progressed or died at the time of analysis was censored at the date of last tumor assessment. (NCT00492297)
Timeframe: from confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) until Progressive Disease (PD) (median 259 days)

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib + Dacarbazine327

[back to top]

Duration of Partial Response

Duration of partial response was the number of days from the date that a partial response was first documented to the date that recurrent or progressive disease was first objectively documented (if patient progressed then censored=no) or to last observation (if patient did not progress then censored=yes). (NCT00492297)
Timeframe: from confirmed PR until PD (median 259 days)

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib + Dacarbazine255

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival was the number of days from the date that combination treatment started until the date of death. (NCT00492297)
Timeframe: from start of treatment until death (median 259 days)

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib + Dacarbazine259

[back to top]

5-year Failure-free Survival Rate for Participants With Hodgkin's Disease Given Rituximab With ABVD

Five year Event Free Survival (EFS) is proportion of surviving participants who remain event free out of total participants at 5 years after receiving Rituximab + ABVD (RABVD). Event-free Survival (EFS) analyzed every 6 months. (NCT00504504)
Timeframe: Baseline to 5 Years or until disease progression

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab + ABVD Chemotherapy83

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) or Better (Disease Control Rate) at 12 Weeks

Disease Control Rate (DCR) was defined as complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR) plus SD using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and the normalization of non-target lesion tumor marker levels. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease from baseline in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. CR and PR had to be confirmed by repeat assessments and performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Stable Disease (SD) was defined as: neither sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD) nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters recorded since treatment began. PD was defined as at least 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. (NCT00533702)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (4 cycles of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Dacarbazine40
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)24

[back to top]

Duration of Response

The duration of overall response was defined as the time from first assessment of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the first date of progressive disease (PD) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0), initiation of other or additional antitumor therapy, or death from any cause. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as having at least a 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. CR and PR had to be confirmed by repeat assessments and performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. PD was defined as at least 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. Participants who did not relapse were censored at the day of their last objective tumor assessment. (NCT00533702)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (of 21-day cycle) up to 17.1 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Dacarbazine11.0
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)NA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Response Rate) at 12 Weeks

Response rate was defined as a CR or a PR using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and the normalization of non-target lesion tumor marker levels. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease from baseline in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. CR and PR had to be confirmed by repeat assessments and performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. (NCT00533702)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (4 cycles of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Dacarbazine13.5
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)4.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) [Overall Response Rate (ORR)]

The ORR was defined as the percentage of all randomized participants with the best overall response of PR or CR using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. CR and PR had to be confirmed by repeat assessments and performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. (NCT00533702)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (of 21-day cycle) up to 17.1 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Dacarbazine17.3
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)4.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) or Better (Disease Control Rate) at 6 Weeks

Disease Control Rate (DCR) was defined as complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR) plus SD using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and the normalization of non-target lesion tumor marker levels. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease from baseline in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. CR and PR had to be confirmed by repeat assessments and performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. SD was defined as: neither sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD) nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters recorded since treatment began. PD was defined as at least 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. (NCT00533702)
Timeframe: 6 weeks (2 cycles of treatment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Dacarbazine54
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)44

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the first day of therapy to the first evidence of disease progression as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0) or death from any cause. Progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of the target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started in comparison with the measurement of the nadir or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. In addition, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions was considered PD. New or existing pleural effusion/ascites required cytological confirmation for PD according to the protocol. Participants who did not progress and who were alive or did not have documented progression or missed ≥2 visits, or had no post baseline assessment were censored at the day of their last tumor assessment. (NCT00533702)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Dacarbazine2.6
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)1.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)

The number of participants who experienced any IMC-1121B (ramucirumab [RAM]) treatment-related and treatment emergent AE (TEAE), treatment-related TEAE of Grade ≥3, treatment-related TE serious AEs (SAEs), treatment-related TEAE resulting in death (Grade 5 AE) and any TEAEs resulting in death. A summary of SAEs and all other non-serious AEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT00533702)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 40 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any RAM related TEAERAM related SAERAM related ≥ Grade 3 AERAM related deathRAM related TEAE leading to discontinuation of RAMAny AE with outcome of death
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)40513142
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Dacarbazine43920132

[back to top]

Phase II - Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR)

Phase II - To determine the overall response rate (ORR) of the combination of dasatinib and DTIC by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0). Tumor assessments were made at baseline and at the end of every second cycle (i.e. every 6 weeks). Partial and complete responses were defined by the best treatment response achieved. (NCT00597038)
Timeframe: 1 Year 6 Months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase II Dose Treatment4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 6 Months

Phase II - PFS Rate in patients receiving dasatinib 70 mg orally (PO) twice a day (BID). Tumor assessments were made at baseline and at the end of every second cycle (i.e. every 6 weeks). Partial and complete responses were defined by the best treatment response achieved. Stable disease was defined as maintenance of the sum of lesions diameters between a 30% reduction and a 20% increase of overall tumour size over 12 weeks or longer. (NCT00597038)
Timeframe: 6 Months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase II Dose Treatment6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With 12 Month Overall Survival (OS)

Phase II - To determine Overall Survival of patients treated with the combination of dasatinib and DTIC at 12 months. (NCT00597038)
Timeframe: 12 Months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase I Dose Escalation9
Phase II Dose Treatment8

[back to top] [back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) Rate

EFS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test will be performed to test the difference in time-to-event distributions between patient groups. Cox proportional hazards model will be utilized to include multiple covariates in the time-to-event analysis. Logistic regression will be utilized to assess the effect of patient prognostic factors on the response rate. (NCT00654732)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RABVD17
ABVD20

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameter of Clearance (CLT) for Ipilimumab, Paclitaxel, Dacarbazine and Active Metabolite AIC - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Population

CLT reported in milliliters/hour (mL/h): derived from drug concentration versus time for ipilimumab (Day 43 only) and paclitaxel, dacarbazine, and AIC (Days 1, 43). Ipilimumab determined from plasma ELISA; LLOQ=0.8 µg/mL; ULOQ=25.6 µg/mL; sample times on Day 43=0 hour (h) predose, 1.5, 4.0, 24, 72, 168, 336, 504 h post dose; starting Day 162 every 12 weeks (Day 1 and 22= 0 h). Paclitaxel determined from plasma using LC/MS/MS detection; LLOQ=10 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL); ULOQ=5000 ng/mL; sample times Day 1 and Day 43=0 h predose, 1.5, 3.0, 3.5, 5,5, 9.5, 24, 48 h postdose. Dacarbazine (DTIC) and AIC determined from plasma using liquid chromatography API tandem mass spectrometry (LC-API/MS/MS) detection; LLOQ for dacarbazine=10.0 ng/mL; ULOQ=5000 ng/mL; AIC LLOQ=0.05 µg/mL; ULOQ=25.0 µg/mL; sample times Day 1: 0 h predose, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 9.5, 24 h post dose.. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 (0 h) to Day 43

,,
InterventionmL/h (Geometric Mean)
CLT of Ipilimumab N=14, 14, 12CLT of Paclitaxel (Day 1) N=20, 0, 0CLT of Paclitaxel (Day 43) N=14, 0, 0CLT of Dacarbazine (Day 1) N=0, 19, 0CLT of Dacarbazine (Day 43) N=0, 16, 0CLT of AIC (Day 1) N=0, 19, 0CLT of AIC (Day 43) N=0, 17, 0
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab11.17NANA34.3337.0991.6788.75
Ipilimumab10.23NANANANANANA
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab11.6327.8725.44NANANANA

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameter Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) for Ipilimumab, Paclitaxel, Dacarbazine and the Active Metabolite for Dacarbazine, 5-aminoimidazole-4carboxamide (AIC)- Pharmacokinetic Analysis Population

Cmax=micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL): drug concentration versus time for ipilimumab (Day 43) and paclitaxel, dacarbazine, and AIC (Days 1, 43). Ipilimumab determined from plasma by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA); lower level of quantitation (LLOQ)=0.8 µg/mL; upper limit of quantitation (ULOQ)=25.6 µg/mL; Day 43=0 hour (h) predose, 1.5, 4.0, 24, 72, 168, 336, 504 h post dose; from Day 162 on every 12 weeks (Day 1 and 22= 0 h). Paclitaxel determined using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) detection; LLOQ=10 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL); ULOQ=5000 ng/mL; Day 1 and Day 43=0 h predose, 1.5, 3.0, 3.5, 5,5, 9.5, 24, 48 h postdose. Dacarbazine (DTIC) and AIC determined from plasma using liquid chromatography atmospheric pressure ionization (API) tandem mass spectrometry (LC-API/MS/MS) detection; LLOQ for dacarbazine=10.0 ng/mL; ULOQ=5000 ng/mL; AIC LLOQ=0.05 µg/mL; ULOQ=25.0 µg/mL; Day 1: 0 h predose, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 9.5, 24 h post dose. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 (0 h) to Day 43

,,
Interventionµg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cmax of Ipilimumab N=14, 14, 12Cmax of Paclitaxel (Day 1) N=20, 0, 0Cmax of Paclitaxel (Day 43) N=14, 0, 0Cmax of Dacarbazine (Day 1) N=0, 19, 0Cmax of Dacarbazine (Day 43) N=0, 16, 0Cmax of AIC (Day 1) N=0, 19, 0Cmax of AIC (Day 43) N=0, 17, 0
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab246.50NANA18.2318.613.573.98
Ipilimumab251.05NANANANANANA
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab234.543.353.19NANANANA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Objective Response to Treatment and Disease Control Using mWHO Criteria - All Randomized Participants

Number of participants with an objective response to treatment excluded participants with a best overall response (BOR) of Stable Disease (SD). Disease control is non-progression of disease while on treatment. A participant was considered to have achieved disease control if he/she had a BOR of CR, PR, or SD in the absence of resected index lesions or new lesions while the participant was considered to have an objective response to treatment in he/she had a BOR of CR or PR in the absence of resected index lesions or new lesions. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with Objective ResponseParticipants with Disease Control
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab510
Ipilimumab59
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab28

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Neutrophils Plus Bands - All Treated Population

Neutrophils plus bands (absolute) were measured as *10^3 cells per microliter (c/µL). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) v3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): 1.5 - < 2.0; GRADE (2): 1.0 - < 1.5; GRADE (3): 0.5 - < 1.0; GRADE (4): < 0.5. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Neutrophils Plus Bands Grade 0Neutrophils Plus Bands Grade 1Neutrophils Plus Bands Grade 3
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab1801
Ipilimumab1910
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab2000

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Grade for Leukocytes - All Treated Population

Leukocytes are measured as *10^3 cells per microliter (c/µL). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) version (v) 3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): 3.0 - < LLN; GRADE (2): 2.0 - < 3.0; GRADE (3): 1.0 - < 2.0; GRADE (4): < 1.0. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Leukocytes Grade 0Leukocytes Grade 1Leukocytes Grade 2Leukocytes Grade 3Leukocytes Grade 4Leukocytes Not Reported
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab1342000
Ipilimumab1711001
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab842510

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Grade for Hemoglobin - All Treated Population

Hemoglobin was measured in grams per deciliter (g/dL). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) v3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): 10.0 - less than (<) lower limit of normal (LLN); GRADE (2): 8.0 - < 10.0; GRADE (3): 6.5 - < 8.0; GRADE (4): < 6.5 (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hemoglobin Grade 0Hemoglobin Grade 1Hemoglobin Grade 2Hemoglobin Grade 3Hemoglobin Not Reported
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab413110
Ipilimumab510401
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab39800

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Best Overall Response Categories Based on Modified World Health Organization (mWHO) Criteria - All Treated Participants

Assessments for antitumor activity by physical exam and routine anatomic imaging were at Week 12 and confirmatory imaging at Weeks 16, 20, and 24. Participants with resected index or new lesions were considered progressed in their disease. Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of all index lesions; Partial Response (PR): Decrease, relative to baseline, of 50% or greater in the sum of the products of the two largest perpendicular diameters of all index lesions, in the absence of Complete Response; Stable Disease (SD): Does not meet criteria for complete or partial response, in the absence of progressive disease. Participants with PR or CR that was not confirmed after at least 4 weeks are scored as SD unless they have new primary lesions; Progressive Disease: At least 25% increase in the sum of products of all index lesions and/or the appearance of any new lesion(s). Unknown=the participants overall response was not known. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseUnknown
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab14581
Ipilimumab05483
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab11693

[back to top] [back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Respiration Rate at Weeks 16 and 48 - All Treated Population

Respiration rate was obtained while the participant was sitting down and measured in breaths per minute (bpm). During the induction phase respiration rate was collected 30 minutes prior to dosing and every 30 minutes for the duration of the ipilimumab infusion. Respiration rate was recorded at Weeks 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, and 22 during the Induction Phase, and at Weeks 24, 36, and 48 during the Maintenance Phase. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionbpm (Mean)
Respiration Rate at Week 16 (N=1, 5, 6)Respiration Rate at Week 48 (N=1, 3, 3)
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab1.4-2.7
Ipilimumab-0.8-1.3
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab0-2.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Weeks 16 and 48 - All Treated Population

Pulse rate was obtained while the participant was sitting down and measured in beats per minute (bpm). During the induction phase pulse rate was collected 30 minutes prior to dosing and every 30 minutes for the duration of the ipilimumab infusion. Pulse rate was recorded at Weeks 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, and 22 during the Induction Phase, and at Weeks 24, 36, and 48 during the Maintenance Phase. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionbpm (Mean)
Pulse Rate at Week 16 (N=1, 6, 9)Pulse Rate at Week 48 (N=1, 4, 4)
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab0.3-9.5
Ipilimumab-0.77.5
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab24.0-3.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline at Weeks 16 and 48 in Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure - All Treated Population

Blood pressure was obtained while the participant was sitting down and was measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). During the induction phase blood pressure was collected 30 minutes prior to dosing and every 30 minutes for the duration of the ipilimumab infusion. Orthostatic blood pressure was to be measured when clinically indicated (for example, participant was experiencing lightheadedness, dizziness, syncope). Blood pressures were recorded at Weeks 1, 4, 7, 10,13, 16, 19, and 22 during the Induction Phase, and at Weeks 24, 36, and 48 during the Maintenance Phase. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 16 (N=1, 6, 9)Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 48 (N=1, 4, 4)Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 16 (N=1, 6, 9)Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 48 (N=1, 4, 4)
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab6.67.02.71.0
Ipilimumab4.98.59.712.0
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab10.02.022.05.0

[back to top]

Mean Baseline Change in Body Temperature at Weeks 16 and 48 - All Treated Population

Temperature was obtained while the participant was sitting down and was measured in degrees Fahrenheit (F). During the induction phase this vital sign was collected 30 minutes prior to dosing and every 30 minutes for the duration of the ipilimumab infusion. Temperature was recorded at Weeks 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, and 22 during the Induction Phase, and at Weeks 24, 36, and 48 during the Maintenance Phase. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventiondegrees F (Mean)
Temperature at Week 16 (N=1, 6, 9)Temperature at Week 48 (N=1, 4, 4)
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab-0.10.0
Ipilimumab0.2-0.2
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab-0.50.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, Deaths, and Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events From Day 1 to Week 48 - All Treated Population

Adverse events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse events version 3.0. Week 48 database lock was 27 July 2010. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with AEsParticipants with SAEsParticipants with SAEs Treatment-RelatedDeathsDeaths Treatment-RelatedParticipants discontinued due to AE(s)
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab1986507
Ipilimumab2095705
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab20941206

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Uric Acid - All Treated Population

Uric acid was measured as milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) v3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): > 1.0 * ULN - 10.0; GRADE (4): > 10.0 mg/dL. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Uric Acid Grade 0Uric Acid Grade 1
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab191
Ipilimumab173
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab200

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Total Lipase - All Treated Population

Total Lipase (as measured with a turbidimetric assay) was measured as units per liter (U/L). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) v3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): > 1.0 - 1.5 * ULN; GRADE (2): > 1.5 - 2.0 * ULN; GRADE (3): > 2.0 - 5.0 * ULN; GRADE (4): > 5.0 X ULN. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Total Lipase Grade 0Total Lipase Grade 1Total Lipase Grade 4Total Lipase Not Reported
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab60013
Ipilimumab40115
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab12107

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) - All Treated Population

AST was measured as Units per Liter (U/L). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) v3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): > 1.0 - 2.5 * upper limits of normal (ULN); GRADE (2): > 2.5 - 5.0 * ULN; GRADE (3): > 5.0 - 20.0 * ULN; GRADE (4): > 20.0 * ULN. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AST Grade 0AST Grade 1AST Grade 2
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab1810
Ipilimumab1541
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab1820

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Total Calcium (High) - All Treated Population

Total Calcium was measured as milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) v3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): 8.0 - < LLN OR > ULN - 11.5; GRADE (2): 7.0 - < 8.0 > 11.5 - 12.5; GRADE (3): 6.0 - < 7.0 > 12.5 - 13.5; GRADE (4): < 6.0 > 13.5 mg/dL. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Total Calcium (High) Grade 0Total Calcium (High) Grade 1
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab190
Ipilimumab191
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab182

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Total Bilirubin - All Treated Population

Total Bilirubin was measured as milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) v3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): > 1.0 - 1.5 * upper limits of normal (ULN); GRADE (2): > 1.5 - 3.0 * ULN; GRADE (3): > 3.0 - 10.0 * ULN; GRADE (4): > 10.0 * ULN. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Total Bilirubin Grade 0Total Bilirubin Grade 1Total Bilirubin Grade 2
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab1711
Ipilimumab1820
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab2000

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Total Amylase - All Treated Population

Amylase was measured as units per liter (U/L). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) v3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): > 1.0 - 1.5 * upper limits of normal (ULN); GRADE (2): > 1.5 - 2.0 * ULN; GRADE (3): > 2.0 - 5.0 * ULN; GRADE (4): > 5.0 * ULN. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Total Amylase Grade 0Total Amylase Grade 1Total Amylase Grade 2Total Amylase Grade 3
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab19000
Ipilimumab16211
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab20000

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Serum Potassium (High) - All Treated Population

Serum potassium was measured as milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) v3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): 3.0 - < LLN OR > ULN - 5.5;; GRADE (2): > 5.5 - 6.0; GRADE (3): 2.5 - < 3.0 > 6.0 - 7.0; GRADE (4): < 2.5 mEq/L. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Serum Potassium (High) Grade 0Serum Potassium (High) Grade 1Serum Potassium (High) Grade 2
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab1720
Ipilimumab1712
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab2000

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Alkaline Phosphatase - All Treated Population

Alkaline Phosphatase was measured as Units per Liter (U/L). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) v3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): > 1.0 - 2.5 * upper limits of normal (ULN); GRADE (2): > 2.5 - 5.0 * ULN; GRADE (3): > 5.0 - 20.0 * ULN; GRADE (4): > 20.0 * ULN. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Alkaline Phosphatase Grade 0Alkaline Phosphatase Grade 1Alkaline Phosphatase Grade 2
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab1810
Ipilimumab1802
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab1460

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Neutrophils - All Treated Population

Neutrophils (absolute) are measured as *10^3 cells per microliter (c/µL). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) v3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): 1.5 - < 2.0; GRADE (2): 1.0 - < 1.5; GRADE (3): 0.5 - < 1.0; GRADE (4): < 0.5 (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Neutrophils Grade 0Neutrophils Grade 1Neutrophils Grade 3
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab1801
Ipilimumab1910
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab2000

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Albumin - All Treated Population

Albumin was measured in grams per deciliter (g/dL). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) v3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): < LLN - 3.0; GRADE (2): < 3.0 - 2.0; GRADE (3): < 2.0 g/dL. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Albumin Grade 0Albumin Grade 1
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab145
Ipilimumab146
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab173

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) - All Treated Population

ALT was measured as Units per Liter (U/L). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) v3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): > 1.0 - 2.5 * upper limits of normal (ULN); GRADE (2): > 2.5 - 5.0 * ULN; GRADE (3): > 5.0 - 20.0 * ULN; GRADE (4): > 20.0 * ULN. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ALT Grade 0ALT Grade 1ALT Grade 2
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab1810
Ipilimumab1631
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab1820

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Grade for Lymphocytes - All Treated Population

Lymphocytes (absolute) were measured as *10^3 cells per microliter (c/µL). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) version (v) 3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): 0.8 - < 1.5; GRADE (2): 0.5 - < 0.8; GRADE (3): 0.2 - < 0.5; GRADE (4): < 0.2 (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lymphocytes Grade 0Lymphocytes Grade 1Lymphocytes Grade 2Lymphocytes Grade 3
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab51310
Ipilimumab61130
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab41231

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Treatment With Toxicity Changes From Baseline by Worst CTC Grade for Platelet Count - All Treated Population

Platelets were measured as *10^9 cells per liter (c/L). National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) v3.0 was used to determine Grade. GRADE (1): 75.0 - < LLN; GRADE (2): 50.0 - < 75.0; GRADE (3): 25.0 - < 50.0; GRADE (4): < 25.0. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 48

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Platelet Count Grade 0Platelet Count Grade 1
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab190
Ipilimumab182
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab200

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameter Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) for Ipilimumab, Paclitaxel, Dacarbazine and Active Metabolite AIC - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Population

Vss reported in liters(L): derived from drug concentration versus time for ipilimumab (Day 43 only) and paclitaxel, dacarbazine, and AIC (Days 1, 43). Ipilimumab determined from plasma ELISA; LLOQ=0.8 µg/mL; ULOQ=25.6 µg/mL; sample times on Day 43=0 hour (h) predose, 1.5, 4.0, 24, 72, 168, 336, 504 h post dose; starting Day 162 every 12 weeks (Day 1 and 22= 0 h). Paclitaxel determined from plasma using LC/MS/MS detection; LLOQ=10 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL); ULOQ=5000 ng/mL; sample times Day 1 and Day 43=0 h predose, 1.5, 3.0, 3.5, 5,5, 9.5, 24, 48 h postdose. Dacarbazine (DTIC) and AIC determined from plasma using liquid chromatography API tandem mass spectrometry (LC-API/MS/MS) detection; LLOQ for dacarbazine=10.0 ng/mL; ULOQ=5000 ng/mL; AIC LLOQ=0.05 µg/mL; ULOQ=25.0 µg/mL; sample times Day 1: 0 h predose, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 9.5, 24 h post dose. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 (0 h) to Day 43

,,
InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
Vss of Ipilimumab N=14, 14, 12Vss of Paclitaxel (Day 43) N=14, 0, 0Vss of Dacarbazine (Day 43) N=0, 16, 0Vss of AIC (Day 1) N=0, 17, 0
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab4.88NA107.90342.64
Ipilimumab5.05NANANA
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab5.10205.63NANA

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameter of Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Ipilimumab, Paclitaxel, Dacarbazine and Active Metabolite AIC - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Population

Tmax reported in hours (h): derived from drug concentration versus time for ipilimumab (Day 43 only) and paclitaxel, dacarbazine, and AIC (Days 1, 43). Ipilimumab determined from plasma ELISA; LLOQ=0.8 µg/mL; ULOQ=25.6 µg/mL; sample times on Day 43=0 hour (h) predose, 1.5, 4.0, 24, 72, 168, 336, 504 h post dose; starting Day 162 every 12 weeks (Day 1 and 22= 0 h). Paclitaxel determined from plasma using LC/MS/MS detection; LLOQ=10 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL); ULOQ=5000 ng/mL; sample times Day 1 and Day 43=0 h predose, 1.5, 3.0, 3.5, 5,5, 9.5, 24, 48 h postdose. Dacarbazine (DTIC) and AIC determined from plasma using liquid chromatography API tandem mass spectrometry (LC-API/MS/MS) detection; LLOQ for dacarbazine=10.0 ng/mL; ULOQ=5000 ng/mL; AIC LLOQ=0.05 µg/mL; ULOQ=25.0 µg/mL; sample times Day 1: 0 h predose, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 9.5, 24 h post dose.. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 (0 h) to Day 43

,,
Interventionh (Median)
Tmax of Ipilimumab N=14, 14, 12Tmax of Paclitaxel (Day 1) N=20, 0, 0Tmax of Paclitaxel (Day 43) N=14, 0, 0Tmax of Dacarbazine (Day 1) N=0, 18, 0Tmax of Dacarbazine (Day 43) N=0, 15, 0Tmax of AIC (Day 1) N=0, 19 0Tmax of AIC (Day 43) N=0, 16, 0
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab4.00NANA1.001.001.001.00
Ipilimumab1.56NANANANANANA
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab1.513.003.00NANANANA

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameter of Terminal Elimination Half Life (T-HALF) for Ipilimumab, Paclitaxel, Dacarbazine and Active Metabolite AIC - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Population

T(HALF) reported in hours (h): derived from drug concentration versus time for ipilimumab (Day 43 only) and paclitaxel, dacarbazine, and AIC (Days 1, 43). Ipilimumab determined from plasma ELISA; LLOQ=0.8 µg/mL; ULOQ=25.6 µg/mL; sample times on Day 43=0 hour (h) predose, 1.5, 4.0, 24, 72, 168, 336, 504 h post dose; starting Day 162 every 12 weeks (Day 1 and 22= 0 h). Paclitaxel determined from plasma using LC/MS/MS detection; LLOQ=10 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL); ULOQ=5000 ng/mL; sample times Day 1 and Day 43=0 h predose, 1.5, 3.0, 3.5, 5,5, 9.5, 24, 48 h postdose. Dacarbazine (DTIC) and AIC determined from plasma using liquid chromatography API tandem mass spectrometry (LC-API/MS/MS) detection; LLOQ for dacarbazine=10.0 ng/mL; ULOQ=5000 ng/mL; AIC LLOQ=0.05 µg/mL; ULOQ=25.0 µg/mL; sample times Day 1: 0 h predose, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 9.5, 24 h post dose. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 (0 h) to Day 43

,,
Interventionh (Mean)
T(HALF) of Ipilimumab N=14, 14, 12T(HALF) of Paclitaxel (Day 1) N=20, 0, 0T(HALF) of Paclitaxel (Day 43) N=14, 0, 0T(HALF) of Dacarbazine (Day 1) N=0, 19, 0T(HALF) of Dacarbazine (Day 43) N=0, 16, 0T(HALF) of AIC (Day 1) N=0, 18, 0T(HALF) of AIC (Day 43) N=0, 16, 0
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab13.39NANA2.112.072.242.21
Ipilimumab15.25NANANANANANA
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab13.9310.2610.41NANANANA

[back to top]

Mean Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC) at Each Nominal Ipilimumab Induction Dose and at End of the Induction Period - Pharmacodynamic Population

Absolute lymphocyte counts were obtained from routine hematology panels from 28 days prior to the first treatment with any study medication through the end of the Induction-Dosing Period and were reported as number*10^3 cells per micro liter (x10^3 c/µL). (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day to Week 12

,,
Intervention10^3 cells/µL (Mean)
Nominal Ipilimumab Induction Dose Number 1Nominal Ipilimumab Induction Dose Number 2Nominal Ipilimumab Induction Dose Number 3Nominal Ipilimumab Induction Dose Number 4End of Ipilimumab Induction dosing Period
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab1.412.051.961.872.07
Ipilimumab1.281.561.991.801.73
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab1.191.621.431.421.67

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to 21 Days [AUC(0-21d)] for Ipilimumab and AUC Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity [AUC(INF)] for Paclitaxel, Dacarbazine and the Active Metabolite AIC - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Population

AUC=micrograms*hour(h) per mL (µg*h/mL): derived from drug concentration versus time for ipilimumab (Day 43 only) and paclitaxel, dacarbazine, and AIC (Days 1, 43). Ipilimumab determined from plasma ELISA; LLOQ=0.8 µg/mL; ULOQ=25.6 µg/mL; sample times on Day 43=0 hour (h) predose, 1.5, 4.0, 24, 72, 168, 336, 504 h post dose; starting Day 162 every 12 weeks (Day 1 and 22= 0 h). Paclitaxel determined from plasma using LC/MS/MS detection; LLOQ=10 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL); ULOQ=5000 ng/mL; sample times Day 1 and Day 43=0 h predose, 1.5, 3.0, 3.5, 5,5, 9.5, 24, 48 h postdose. Dacarbazine (DTIC) and AIC determined from plasma using liquid chromatography API tandem mass spectrometry (LC-API/MS/MS) detection; LLOQ for dacarbazine=10.0 ng/mL; ULOQ=5000 ng/mL; AIC LLOQ=0.05 µg/mL; ULOQ=25.0 µg/mL; sample times Day 1: 0 h predose, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5, 9.5, 24 h post dose. (NCT00796991)
Timeframe: Day 1 (0 h) to Day 43

,,
Interventionµg*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
AUC(0-21d) of Ipilimumab N=14, 14, 12AUC(INF) of Paclitaxel (Day 1) N=20, 0, 0AUC(INF) of Paclitaxel (Day 43) N=14, 0, 0AUC(INF) of Dacarbazine (Day 1) N=0, 19, 0AUC(INF) of Dacarbazine (Day 43) N=0, 16, 0AUC(INF) of AIC (Day 1) N=0, 18, 0AUC(INF) of AIC (Day 43) N=0, 16, 0
Dacarbazine, Ipilimumab49569.06NANA47.3641.1317.6817.38
Ipilimumab54039.79NANANANANANA
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Ipilimumab46925.3612.3713.41NANANANA

[back to top]

Overall Tumor Metabolic Response

"Complete metabolic response (CMR)-complete resolution of all metabolically active target and non-target lesions, and no interval development of new lesions.~Partial metabolic response (PMR)~Target lesions: 20% or greater decrease in maximum SUV from baseline. No unequivocal metabolic progression of non-target disease, and no unequivocal new lesions.~Non-target lesions: decrease in total number of non-target lesions, without complete resolution of metabolically active disease, or unequivocal decrease in degree of FDG activity within >50% of the lesions. No unequivocal new lesions.~Stable metabolic disease (SMD): does not qualify for CMR, PMR, or PMD.~Progressive metabolic disease (PMD):~Unequivocal development of one more new metabolically active lesions~Target lesion: 20% or greater increase in maximum SUV from baseline.~Non-target lesions: unequivocal increase in FDG activity" (NCT00802880)
Timeframe: After completion of 3 cycles

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CMRPMRSMDPMD
Dacarbazine041334

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

-Progression - At least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. (NCT00802880)
Timeframe: Until completion of follow-up (estimated to be 1 year)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dacarbazine2.07

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT00802880)
Timeframe: Until completion of follow-up or patient death (estimated to be 1 year)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dacarbazine8.09

[back to top]

Rate of Nausea/Emesis (Any Grade)

Approximately 18 weeks (NCT00802880)
Timeframe: Completion of 6 cycles of treatment (18 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dacarbazine22.5

[back to top]

Rate of Neutropenia (Grade 3/4)

"Grade 3 neutropenia = absolute neutrophil count of <1000 - 500/mm^3~Grade 4 neutropenia = absolute neutrophil count of <500/mm^3" (NCT00802880)
Timeframe: Completion of 6 cycles of treatment (18 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dacarbazine7.5

[back to top]

Overall Disease Control Rate

(NCT00802880)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete responsePartial responseStable diseaseProgressive disease
Dacarbazine0051

[back to top]

Correlate Time to Progression With Best Metabolic Response

-Progression - At least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. (NCT00802880)
Timeframe: Completion of follow-up (estimated to be 1 year)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Partial metabolic responseStable metabolic diseaseProgressive metabolic disease
Dacarbazine3.955.302.07

[back to top]

Correlate the Tumor Metabolic Response Rate With the Tumor Anatomic Response Rate

(NCT00802880)
Timeframe: After completion of 3 cycles

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
PRSDPDTotal
Partial Metabolic Response1214
Progressive Metabolic Disease182433
Stable Metabolic Disease010212
Total2202749

[back to top]

Correlate the Time to Progression With Best Anatomic Response

-Progression - At least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. (NCT00802880)
Timeframe: Completion of follow-up (estimated to be 1 year)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Partial responseStable diseaseProgressive disease
DacarbazineNA4.141.97

[back to top]

Correlate Overall Survival With Best Metabolic Response

(NCT00802880)
Timeframe: Completion of follow-up (estimated to be 1 year)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Partial metabolic responseStable metabolic diseaseProgressive metabolic disease
Dacarbazine18.1618.598.75

[back to top]

Correlate Overall Survival With Best Anatomic Response

(NCT00802880)
Timeframe: Completion of follow-up (estimated to be 1 year)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Partial responseStable diseaseProgressive disease
Dacarbazine18.1614.777.96

[back to top]

Comparison of the SUV at up to 3 Tumor Sites

(NCT00802880)
Timeframe: Baseline and after every three cycles of treatment (up to 1 year)

Interventionstandard uptake value (Mean)
BaselineEnd of cycle 3End of cycle 6End of cycle 9End of cycle 12
Dacarbazine7.427.577.76.897.48

[back to top]

Best Anatomical Tumor Response

"Complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions, disappearance of all non-target lesions, normalization of tumor level marker~Partial response (PR): at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD, persistence of one or more non-target lesion and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the upper limits of normal~Stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage in target lesions to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease taking as references the smallest sum LD since the treatment started, persistence of one or more non-target lesion and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits of normal~Progressive disease (PD): at least 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions and/or appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions" (NCT00802880)
Timeframe: After completion of 3 cycles

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete responsePartial responseStable diseaseProgressive disease
Dacarbazine022230

[back to top]

Percentage of HIV-negative Patients Who Are PET-positive After 2 Cycles of ABVD With 2-year PFS

Disease progression is defined using the 2007 revised Cheson et al. criteria that is at least 50% increase in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of target measurable nodal lesions over the smallest sum observed, or >= 50% increase in greatest transverse diameter (GTD) of any nodal > 1 cm in shortest axis, or >= 50% increase in the SPD of other target measurable lesions over the smallest sum observed, any new bone marrow involvement, any new lesion, lymph node with long axis is > 1.5 cm or if both long and short axes are > 1 cm, PET positive if patients with no pretreatment PET scan or when PET scan was positive before therapy. Progression-free survival is measured from date of registration to date of first observation of progressive disease, or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and progression-free are censored at date of last contact. (NCT00822120)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HIV-negative: 2 Cycles of ABVD Followed by Escalated BEACOPP64

[back to top]

Percentage of HIV-negative Patients With 2-year Overall Survival (OS) Treated With 2 Initial Cycles of ABVD Followed by Response-Adapted Therapy Based on Interim FDG-PET Imaging

Measured from date of registration to date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and are censored at date of last contact. (NCT00822120)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HIV-negative:2 Cycles of ABVD Followed by PET-directed Therapy98

[back to top]

Percentage of HIV-negative Patients With 2-year Progression-free Survival (PFS) Treated With 2 Initial Cycles of Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vnblastine, and Dacarbazine (ABVD) Followed by Response-adapted Therapy Based on Interim FDG-PET Imaging.

Disease progression is defined using the 2007 revised Cheson et al. criteria that is at least 50% increase in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of target measurable nodal lesions over the smallest sum observed, or >= 50% increase in greatest transverse diameter (GTD) of any nodal > 1 cm in shortest axis, or >= 50% increase in the SPD of other target measurable lesions over the smallest sum observed, any new bone marrow involvement, any new lesion, lymph node with long axis is > 1.5 cm or if both long and short axes are > 1 cm, PET positive if patients with no pretreatment PET scan or when PET scan was positive before therapy. Progression-free survival is measured from date of registration to date of first observation of progressive disease, or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and progression-free are censored at date of last contact. (NCT00822120)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HIV-negative: 2 Cycles of ABVD Followed by PET-directed Therap79

[back to top]

Percentage of HIV-positive Patients With 2-year Progression-free Survival (PFS) Treated With Initial 2 Cycles of Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vnblastine, and Dacarbazine (ABVD) Followed by Response-adapted Therapy Based on Interim FDG-PET Imaging.

Disease progression is defined using the 2007 revised Cheson et al. criteria that is at least 50% increase in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of target measurable nodal lesions over the smallest sum observed, or >= 50% increase in greatest transverse diameter (GTD) of any nodal > 1 cm in shortest axis, or >= 50% increase in the SPD of other target measurable lesions over the smallest sum observed, any new bone marrow involvement, any new lesion, lymph node with long axis is >1.5 cm or if both long and short axes are > 1 cm, PET positive if patients with no pretreatment PET scan or when PET scan was positive before therapy. progression-free survival is measured from date of registration to date of first observation of progressive disease, or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and progression-free are censored at date of last contact. (NCT00822120)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
HIV-positive: 2 Cycles of ABVD Followed by PET-directed Therap83

[back to top]

Percentage of HIV-positive Patients With 5-year Overall Survival (OS) Treated With 2 Initial Cycles of ABVD Followed by Response-Adapted Therapy Based on Interim FDG-PET Imaging.

Measured from date of registration to date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and are censored at date of last contact. (NCT00822120)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HIV-positive: 2 Cycles of ABVD Followed by PET-directed Therap89

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Complete and Partial Response Rates for HIV-negative Patients Treated With Response- Adapted Therapy Based on FDG-PET Imaging After 2 Cycles of ABVD

Complete Response (CR) is a complete disappearance of all disease with the exception of the following. If no PET scan or when the PET scan was positive before therapy, a post-treatment residual mass of any size is permitted if it is PET negative. If the PET scan was negative before therapy, all nodal masses at baseline must have regressed. No new lesions. Previously enlarged organs must have regressed and not be palpable. Bone marrow (BM) must be negative if positive at baseline. Normalization of markers. Partial Response (PR) is a 50% decrease in the sum of products of greatest diameters (SPD) for up to 6 identified dominant lesions, including spleenic and hepatic nodules from baseline. No new lesions and no increase in the size of liver, spleen or other nodes. If PET scan or when the PET scan was positive before therapy, PET should be positive in at least one previously involved site. (NCT00822120)
Timeframe: 7 months after registration

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
PET-negative: Continued ABVD After 2 Cycles of ABVD100
PET-positive: BEACOPP Escalated After 2 Cycles of ABVD93

[back to top]

Overall Objective Response

Response and progression will be evaluated in this study using the new international criteria proposed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline (version 1.1) (NCT00837148)
Timeframe: at 18 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progression of Disease (POD)
Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients5228

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypercalcemia (HCA) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards HCA laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Unknown (UNK), Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
HCA - SCR UNK; SE G0HCA - SCR UNK; SE G1HCA - SCR UNK; SE G2HCA - SCR UNK; SE G3HCA - SCR UNK; SE G4HCA - SCR UNK; SE UNKHCA - SCR G0; SE G0HCA - SCR G0; SE G1HCA - SCR G0; SE G2HCA - SCR G0; SE G3HCA - SCR G0; SE G4HCA - SCR G0; SE UNKHCA - SCR G1; SE G1HCA - SCR G1; SE G2HCA - SCR G1; SE G3HCA - SCR G1; SE G4HCA - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP210000370000611000

[back to top]

Concentrations of Antibodies Against Protein D (Anti-PD)

Anti-PD antibody concentrations were presented ad geometric mean concentrations (GMTs) and expressed in ELISA units per millilitre (EL.U/mL). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: Post Dose 4 at Week 13 (W13).

InterventionEL.U/mL (Geometric Mean)
GSK2132231A GROUP9979.6
GSK2132231A GS+ Group10437
GSK2132231A GS- Group10853.6
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group2176

[back to top]

Anti-MAGE-A3 Antibody Concentrations

Anti-MAGE-A3 antibody concentrations were presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMTs) and expressed in ELISA units per millilitre (EL.U/mL) (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: Post Dose 4 at Week 13 (W13).

InterventionEL.U/mL (Geometric Mean)
GSK2132231A GROUP2778.7
GSK2132231A GS+ Group2650.8
GSK2132231A GS- Group4046.9
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group336.0

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Lymphopenia (LYM) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards LYM laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
LYM - SCR G0; SE G0LYM - SCR G0; SE G1LYM - SCR G0; SE G2LYM - SCR G0; SE G3LYM - SCR G0; SE G4LYM - SCR G0; SE UNKLYM - SCR G1; SE G0LYM - SCR G1; SE G1LYM - SCR G1; SE G2LYM - SCR G1; SE G3LYM - SCR G1; SE G4LYM - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP18136002243000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Bilirubine (BIL) Values by Maximum Grade.

The status of each patient as regards BIL laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Unknown (UNK) and Grade 0 (G0). CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
BIL - SCR UNK; SE G0BIL - SCR UNK; SE G1BIL - SCR UNK; SE G2BIL - SCR UNK; SE G3BIL - SCR UNK; SE G4BIL - SCR UNK; SE UNKBIL - SCR G0; SE G0BIL - SCR G0; SE G1BIL - SCR G0; SE G2BIL - SCR G0; SE G3BIL - SCR G0; SE G4BIL - SCR G0; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP1000003930005

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Creatinine (CREA) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards CREA laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end(SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0). CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
CREA - SCR G0; SE G0CREA - SCR G0; SE G1CREA - SCR G0; SE G2CREA - SCR G0; SE G3CREA - SCR G0; SE G4CREA - SCR G0; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP4041012

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Gamma-glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards GGT laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end(SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0), G1 and G3. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
GGT - SCR G0; SE G0GGT - SCR G0; SE G1GGT - SCR G0; SE G2GGT - SCR G0; SE G3GGT - SCR G0; SE G4GGT - SCR G0; SE UNKGGT - SCR G1; SE G0GGT - SCR G1; SE G1GGT - SCR G1; SE G2GGT - SCR G1; SE G3GGT - SCR G1; SE G4GGT - SCR G1; SE UNKGGT - SCR G3; SE G0GGT - SCR G3; SE G1GGT - SCR G3; SE G2GGT - SCR G3; SE G3GGT - SCR G3; SE G4GGT - SCR G3; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP20114002220000000100

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hemoglobin (HGB) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards HGB laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
HGB - SCR G0; SE G0HGB - SCR G0; SE G1HGB - SCR G0; SE G2HGB - SCR G0; SE G3HGB - SCR G0; SE G4HGB - SCR G0; SE UNKHGB - SCR G1; SE G0HGB - SCR G1; SE G1HGB - SCR G1; SE G2HGB - SCR G1; SE G3HGB - SCR G1; SE G4HGB - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP22145102220000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards AST laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
AST - SCR G0; SE G0AST - SCR G0; SE G1AST - SCR G0; SE G2AST - SCR G0; SE G3AST - SCR G0; SE G4AST - SCR G0; SE UNKAST - SCR G1; SE G0AST - SCR G1; SE G1AST - SCR G1; SE G2AST - SCR G1; SE G3AST - SCR G1; SE G4AST - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP3621011231001

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hyperkalemia (HKA) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards HKA laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0), G1 and G2. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
HKA - SCR G0; SE G0HKA - SCR G0; SE G1HKA - SCR G0; SE G2HKA - SCR G0; SE G3HKA - SCR G0; SE G4HKA - SCR G0; SE UNKHKA - SCR G1; SE G0HKA - SCR G1; SE G1HKA - SCR G1; SE G2HKA - SCR G1; SE G3HKA - SCR G1; SE G4HKA - SCR G1; SE UNKHKA - SCR G2; SE G0HKA - SCR G2; SE G1HKA - SCR G2; SE G2HKA - SCR G2; SE G3HKA - SCR G2; SE G4HKA - SCR G2; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP4220001100001100000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypernatremia (HNA) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards HNA laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
HNA - SCR G0; SE G0HNA - SCR G0; SE G1HNA - SCR G0; SE G2HNA - SCR G0; SE G3HNA - SCR G0; SE G4HNA - SCR G0; SE UNKHNA - SCR G1; SE G0HNA - SCR G1; SE G1HNA - SCR G1; SE G2HNA - SCR G1; SE G3HNA - SCR G1; SE G4HNA - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP4400002200000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypoalbuminemia(hAL) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards hAL laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Unknown (UNK), Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
hAL - SCR UNK; SE G0hAL - SCR UNK; SE G1hAL - SCR UNK; SE G2hAL - SCR UNK; SE G3hAL - SCR UNK; SE G4hAL - SCR UNK; SE UNKhAL - SCR G0; SE G0hAL - SCR G0; SE G1hAL - SCR G0; SE G2hAL - SCR G0; SE G3hAL - SCR G0; SE G4hAL - SCR G0; SE UNKhAL - SCR G1; SE G1hAL - SCR G1; SE G2hAL - SCR G1; SE G3hAL - SCR G1; SE G4hAL - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP101001264200443002

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypocalcemia(hCA) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards hCA laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Unknown (UNK), Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
hCA - SCR UNK; SE G0hCA - SCR UNK; SE G1hCA - SCR UNK; SE G2hCA - SCR UNK; SE G3hCA - SCR UNK; SE G4hCA - SCR UNK; SE UNKhCA - SCR G0; SE G0hCA - SCR G0; SE G1hCA - SCR G0; SE G2hCA - SCR G0; SE G3hCA - SCR G0; SE G4hCA - SCR G0; SE UNKhCA - SCR G1; SE G0hCA - SCR G1; SE G1hCA - SCR G1; SE G2hCA - SCR G1; SE G3hCA - SCR G1; SE G4hCA - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP1100102770005050001

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hypokalemia (hKA) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards hKA laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
hKA - SCR G0; SE G0hKA - SCR G0; SE G1hKA - SCR G0; SE G2hKA - SCR G0; SE G3hKA - SCR G0; SE G4hKA - SCR G0; SE UNKhKA - SCR G1; SE G0hKA - SCR G1; SE G1hKA - SCR G1; SE G2hKA - SCR G1; SE G3hKA - SCR G1; SE G4hKA - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP4210001300001

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Hyponatremia (hNA) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards hNA laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
hNA - SCR G0; SE G0hNA - SCR G0; SE G1hNA - SCR G0; SE G2hNA - SCR G0; SE G3hNA - SCR G0; SE G4hNA - SCR G0; SE UNKhNA - SCR G1; SE G0hNA - SCR G1; SE G1hNA - SCR G1; SE G2hNA - SCR G1; SE G3hNA - SCR G1; SE G4hNA - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP33100102110000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Leukocytes (LEU) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards LEU laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
LEU - SCR G0; SE G0LEU - SCR G0; SE G1LEU - SCR G0; SE G2LEU - SCR G0; SE G3LEU - SCR G0; SE G4LEU - SCR G0; SE UNKLEU - SCR G1; SE G0LEU - SCR G1; SE G1LEU - SCR G1; SE G2LEU - SCR G1; SE G3LEU - SCR G1; SE G4LEU - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP3760102011000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Neutrophils (NEU) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards NEU laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0). CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
NEU - SCR G0; SE G0NEU - SCR G0; SE G1NEU - SCR G0; SE G2NEU - SCR G0; SE G3NEU - SCR G0; SE G4NEU - SCR G0; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP3941202

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards PTT laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
PTT - SCR G0; SE G0PTT - SCR G0; SE G1PTT - SCR G0; SE G2PTT - SCR G0; SE G3PTT - SCR G0; SE G4PTT - SCR G0; SE UNKPTT - SCR G1; SE G0PTT - SCR G1; SE G1PTT - SCR G1; SE G2PTT - SCR G1; SE G3PTT - SCR G1; SE G4PTT - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP3530107010100

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Platelets(PLT) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards PLT laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
PLT - SCR G0; SE G0PLT - SCR G0; SE G1PLT - SCR G0; SE G2PLT - SCR G0; SE G3PLT - SCR G0; SE G4PLT - SCR G0; SE UNKPLT - SCR G1; SE G0PLT - SCR G1; SE G1PLT - SCR G1; SE G2PLT - SCR G1; SE G3PLT - SCR G1; SE G4PLT - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP3951002100000

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and With AEs by Maximum Grade

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs reported are here below tabulated irrespective of grade (any), as well as graded by maximum grade reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. Maximum grade reported and tabulated were Grade 1 (G1), G2, G3, G4 and G5. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: Within the 31-day follow-up period post treatment administration.

InterventionSubjects (Number)
Patients with any AEsPatients with G1 AEsPatients with G2 AEsPatients with G3 AEsPatients with G4 AEsPatients with G5 AEs
GSK2132231A GROUP4814191230

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and With AEs by Maximum Grade

SAEs include medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a patient, is a Grade 4 AE according to the CTCAE, version3.0. Events which were part of the natural course of the disease under study were captured as part of the clinical activity outcome variables in this study; therefore did not need to be reported as SAEs. Progression/recurrence of the tumor was recorded as part of the clinical assessment data collection, and deaths due to progressive disease was recorded on a specific form, but not as an SAE. SAEs reported are here below tabulated irrespective of grade (any), as well as graded by maximum grade reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. Maximum grade reported and tabulated were Grade 1 (G1), G2, G3, G4 and G5. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: Within the 31-day follow-up period post treatment administration.

InterventionSubjects (Number)
Patients with any SAEsPatients with G1 SAEsPatients with G2 SAEsPatients with G3 SAEsPatients with G4 SAEsPatients with G5 SAEs
GSK2132231A GROUP1012520

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Mixed Response (MxR) to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment

Assessment was done based on a set of MLs identified at baseline as TLs and NTLs followed up until disease progression. MLs were assessed as regards matching below MxR definitions. In case of evaluability per RECIST: a) MxR Type 1= at least (a.l.) 30% decrease in LD in a.l. one TL measured at baseline. Such response occurring in SD/PD status of LD of TL and without appearance of one or more new lesions = SD/PD with TL regression; b) MxR Type 2: appearance of one or more new lesions occurring in SD/PR status of LD of TL, and = SD/PR with new lesion. In case of non-evaluability per RECIST: a) MxR Type 1 = a clear decrease in diameters occurring in a.l. one TL measured at baseline. Such response occurring in SD/PD status of LD of (baseline) TL and without appearance of one or more new lesions = SD/PD with TL regression; b) MxR Type 2 = appearance of one or more new lesions occurring in SD/PR status of LD of TL = SD/PR with new lesion. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

,,,
InterventionPatients (Number)
MxR: SD/PR with new lesionMxR: SD/PD with target lesion regression
GSK2132231A GROUP101
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group00
GSK2132231A GS- Group41
GSK2132231A GS+ Group60

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Objective Tumor Response (OR) to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment

Response assessment was done based on a set of measurable lesions (MLs) identified at baseline as target lesions (TLs), and followed up until disease progression. Up to 5 MLs per organ & 10 in total were identified as TLs and measured at baseline, selected based on size (those with the longest diameter [LD]) and measurability; a sum of LDs for all TLs was calculated and reported as baseline sum LD, which was used to characterize objective tumor response (OR), OR being defined as either complete response (CR) and/or partial response (PR) post MAGE-A3 ASCI treatment. After identification, MLs and TLs were assessed as regards CR and PR definitions per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria: CR = Disappearance of all extranodal target lesions. All pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to <10 mm in short axis; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the SLD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

,,,
Interventionpatients (Number)
ORCRPR
GSK2132231A GROUP413
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group000
GSK2132231A GS- Group000
GSK2132231A GS+ Group413

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Stable Disease (SD) Response to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment

Assessment was done based on a set of MLs identified at baseline as TLs and NTLs followed up until disease progression. TLs and NTLs were assessed as regards matching or not SD-related definitions, 1) SD definitions per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria for TLs >= 20 mm and TLs both >= and < 20 mm: a) for TLs: SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify as a PR nor sufficient increase to qualify as PD, taking as references the smallest sum LD since treatment start. and b) for NTLs: SD = Persistence of one or more NTL; 2) following below criteria for TLs < 20mm e. a. a) for TLs: PR/SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR nor sufficient increase, to qualify for PD taking as references the smallest sum LD since treatment start, and b) for NTLs: PR/SD = Persistence of one or more NTL. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

,,,
Interventionpatients (Number)
SDSD/PR
GSK2132231A GROUP50
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group10
GSK2132231A GS- Group00
GSK2132231A GS+ Group40

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Alkaline Phosphatase (ALK) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards ALK laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end(SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0) and G1. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
ALK - SCR G0; SE G0ALK - SCR G0; SE G1ALK - SCR G0; SE G2ALK - SCR G0; SE G3ALK - SCR G0; SE G4ALK - SCR G0; SE UNKALK - SCR G1; SE G0ALK - SCR G1; SE G1ALK - SCR G1; SE G2ALK - SCR G1; SE G3ALK - SCR G1; SE G4ALK - SCR G1; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP31110001130001

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Abnormal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Values by Maximum Grade

The status of each patient as regards ALT laboratory values at baseline (SCR) up to study end (SE) was collected and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Adverse event terminology, version 3.0. The post-treatment values were presented by worst grade versus baseline grade. SCR CTC grade statuses reported were Grade 0 (G0), G1 and G2. CTC grade statuses reported at SE were G0, G1, G2, G3, G4, and Unknown (UNK). (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionSubjects (Number)
ALT - SCR G0; SE G0ALT - SCR G0; SE G1ALT - SCR G0; SE G2ALT - SCR G0; SE G3ALT - SCR G0; SE G4ALT - SCR G0; SE UNKALT - SCR G1; SE G0ALT - SCR G1; SE G1ALT - SCR G1; SE G2ALT - SCR G1; SE G3ALT - SCR G1; SE G4ALT - SCR G1; SE UNKALT - SCR G2; SE G0ALT - SCR G2; SE G1ALT - SCR G2; SE G2ALT - SCR G2; SE G3ALT - SCR G2; SE G4ALT - SCR G2; SE UNK
GSK2132231A GROUP3431101321001010000

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF), by Gene Signature

TTF was defined as withdrawal from treatment with the MAGE-A3 ASCI study product due to disease progression or death. TTF analysis was performed using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2132231A GS+ Group2.8
GSK2132231A GS- Group2.3
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group4.3

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) for the Overall Population

PFS was defined and calculated as the time from first treatment to either the first progression of the disease or the date of death, whichever occurred first. In case a patient went off protocol treatment, the date of first documented progression (if applicable) was to be used as date of progression. Patients still alive with no evidence of disease progression at the time of their last visit or for whom date of first documented progression was not applicable, were censored at the time of the last examination. PFS analysis was performed using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2132231A GROUP2.8

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Gene Signature

PFS was defined and calculated as the time from first treatment to either the first progression of the disease or the date of death, whichever occurred first. In case a patient went off protocol treatment, the date of first documented progression (if applicable) was to be used as date of progression. Patients still alive with no evidence of disease progression at the time of their last visit or for whom date of first documented progression was not applicable, were censored at the time of the last examination. PFS analysis was performed using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2132231A GROUP2.8
GSK2132231A GS+ Group2.8
GSK2132231A GS- Group2.8
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group5.1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) After Slow Progressive Disease (SPD) by Gene Signature

PFS after initial SPD was defined and calculated as the time from the time point at which the disease was the most advanced during the treatment to either a new progression of the disease or the date to death, whichever occurred first as another secondary outcome of this study. In that case, the largest diameter during the course of treatment was to be used as reference measurement. This outcome was defined to take into account the delay to induce an active immune response and the strict rules set up in this study to allow pursuing investigational treatment in case of SPD. PFS after SPD analysis was performed using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2132231A GS+ Group2.8
GSK2132231A GS- Group2.8
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group5.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) by Gene Signature

OS was defined as the time from first treatment to the date of death. OS analysis was performed using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. Each patient was censored out at the time of death. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2132231A GROUP9.4
GSK2132231A GS+ Group11.4
GSK2132231A GS- Group5.3
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group0

[back to top]

Number of Seroconverted Patients for Melanoma Antigen (Anti-MAGE-A3)

Seroconversion was defined as a concentration of antibodies assessed that was greater than the cut-off value for a patient whose concentration of such antibodies was below the cut-off level before the initiation of treatment. Seroconverted patients were those patients with anti-MAGE-A3 antibody concentrations ≥ 27. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: Post Dose 4 at Week 13 (W13).

InterventionPatients (Number)
GSK2132231A GROUP28
GSK2132231A GS+ Group19
GSK2132231A GS- Group8
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Treatment Response for Anti-PD

Treatment response defined as: For initially seronegative patients: post-administration antibody concentration ≥ 100 EL.U/mL For initially seropositive patients: post-administration antibody concentration ≥ 2 fold the pre-vaccination antibody concentration (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: Post Dose 4 at Week 13 (W13).

InterventionPatients (Number)
GSK2132231A GROUP28
GSK2132231A GS+ Group19
GSK2132231A GS- Group8
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Treatment Response for Anti-MAGE-A3 Antibodies

Treatment response defined as: For initially seronegative patients: post-administration antibody concentration ≥ 27 EL.U/mL For initially seropositive patients: post-administration antibody concentration ≥ 2 fold the pre-vaccination antibody concentration (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: Post Dose 4 at Week 13 (W13).

InterventionPatients (Number)
GSK2132231A GROUP28
GSK2132231A GS+ Group19
GSK2132231A GS- Group8
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group1

[back to top]

Number of Patients Reported With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Serious adverse events (SAEs) assessed include medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity. Events which were part of the natural course of the disease under study (i.e., disease progression, recurrence) were captured as part of the clinical activity outcome variables in this study; therefore these did not need to be reported as SAEs. Progression/recurrence of the tumor in a patient was recorded as part of the clinical assessment data collection, and deaths due to progressive disease was recorded on a specific form, but not as an SAE. However, if the investigator considered that there was a causal relationship between treatment or protocol design/procedures and the disease progression/recurrence, then the event was reported as an SAE. Any new primary cancer (non-related to the cancer under study) was reported as an SAE. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study period, up to 5 years

InterventionPatients (Number)
GSK2132231A GROUP10

[back to top]

Duration of Stable Disease (SD) Response to MAGE-A3 ASCI Study Treatment

Assessment was done based on a set of MLs identified at baseline as TLs and NTLs followed up until disease progression. Stable disease was defined as follows: 1) In case of target lesions (TL) greater than or equal to (≥) 20 mm: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for Partial Response nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progressive Disease, taking as references the sum of Longest Diameter (LD) of TL recorded previously but not necessarily at baseline; 2) In case of TL both less than 20 mm and ≥ 20 mm: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify as a PR nor sufficient increase to qualify as PD, taking as references the smallest sum LD since the start of the treatment. The minimal time interval required between 2 measurements for determination of SD was at least 12 weeks. (NCT00849875)
Timeframe: During the entire study, up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2132231A GS+ Group5.6
GSK2132231A GS- Group7.7
GSK2132231A GS Unknown Group5.1

[back to top]

Nadir for the Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Measurements

Maximal degree of myelosuppression during study drug dosing was represented by the nadir in ANC measurements over all treatment cycles. (NCT00864253)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to 106 weeks; up to data cut off 30 June 2012

Intervention10^9/L (Median)
ABI-007 150mg/m^21.50
Dacarbazine 1000mg/m^22.40

[back to top]

Nadir for the Hemoglobin Count Measurements

Maximal degree of myelosuppression during study drug dosing was represented by the nadir in hemoglobin count measurements over all treatment cycles. (NCT00864253)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to 106 weeks; up to data cut off 30 June 2012

Interventiong/L (Median)
ABI-007 150mg/m^2109.0
Dacarbazine 1000mg/m^2122.0

[back to top]

Nadir for White Blood Cells (WBCs) Measurements

Maximal degree of myelosuppression was represented by the nadir in white blood cells (WBCs) count measurements over all treatment cycles. (NCT00864253)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to 106 weeks; up to data cut off 30 June 2012

Intervention10^9/L (Median)
ABI-007 150mg/m^23.00
Dacarbazine 1000mg/m^24.10

[back to top]

Participant Survival

Survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death (any cause). Participants were censored at the last known time that they were alive. (NCT00864253)
Timeframe: Up to 38 months; Up to data cut off of 30 June 2012

Interventionmonths (Median)
ABI-007 150mg/m^212.8
Dacarbazine 1000mg/m^210.7

[back to top]

Nadir for Platelet Count Measurements.

Maximal degree of myelosuppression was represented by the nadir in platelet count measurements over all treatment cycles. (NCT00864253)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to 106 weeks; up to data cut off 30 June 2012

Intervention10^9/L (Median)
ABI-007 150mg/m^2228.5
Dacarbazine Arm B153

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) in Responding Participants

Duration of response (DOR) as measured by PFS based on radiological review for participants who achieved an objective confirmed response of CR or PR. DOR was defined as progression-free survival in responders, i.e. as the time between the start of a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and the start of progressive disease (PD) or participants death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants that did not have progression or had not died were censored at the last known time the participant was progression free. Participants that had initiated other anticancer therapy prior to progression were censored at the time when new anticancer therapy was initiated. Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) are defined in outcome #4. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions; or the appearance of one or more new lesions; or the unequivocal progression of a non-target lesion. (NCT00864253)
Timeframe: up to data cut off 30 June 2012

Interventionmonths (Median)
ABI-007 150mg/m^211.1
Dacarbazine 1000mg/m^216.4

[back to top]

Summary of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

"A Treatment Emergent AE (TEAE) was any AE that began or worsened after the start of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or end of study whichever is later. A treatment related toxicity was one considered by the investigator to be possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug. AE's were graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) V 3.0 criteria and the following scale:~Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life threatening, and Grade 5 = Death A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that is fatal or life threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; requires prolonged hospitalizations; is a congenital anomaly birth defect in the offspring of a patient, and conditions not included in the above that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above." (NCT00864253)
Timeframe: Maximum exposure to study drug was 106 weeks; up to data cut off of 30 June 2012

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥1 TEAE≥1 TEAE related to study drug≥1 NCI CTCAE Grade (GR) 3 or above≥1 NCI CTCAE GR 3 or above TEAE to study drug≥1 TEAE with outcome of death≥1 drug related TEAE with outcome of death≥1 serious TEAE≥1 serious TEAE related to study drug≥1 TEAE leading to a dose reduction of study drug≥1 related TEAE leading to dose reduction≥1 TEAE leading to drug interruption≥1 drug related TEAE leading to drug interruption≥1 TEAE leading to dose delay of study drug≥1 drug related TEAE leading to dose delay≥1 TEAE leading to drug discontinuation≥1 drug related TEAE leading to drug discontinuing
ABI-007 150mg/m^22552501671298262238180431241065956
Dacarbazine 1000mg/m^2239212117711154175149161584771211

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Who Achieve an Objective Confirmed Complete or Partial Response Based on Blinded Radiology Assessment of Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.0

RECIST defines complete response (CR): The disappearance of all known disease and no new sites or disease related symptoms confirmed at least 4 weeks after initial documentation. All sites must be assessed, including non-measurable sites, such as effusions, or markers. Disappearance of all non-target lesions. The normalization of tumor marker level confirmed at least 4 weeks after initial documentation. Partial response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters confirmed at least 4 weeks after initial documentation. PR is also recorded when all measurable disease has completely disappeared, but a non-measurable component (i.e., ascites) is still present but not progressing. As well as persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or the maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT00864253)
Timeframe: every 8 weeks; up to data cut off 30 June 2012

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)
ABI-007 150mg/m^2015
Dacarbazine 1000mg/m^2011

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Reductions, or Dose Interruptions, or Dose Delays of Study Drug

The number of participants with dose reductions, dose interruptions and dose delays that occurred during the treatment period. Dose reductions, interruptions and delays are typically caused by clinically significant laboratory abnormalities and /or treatment emergent adverse events/toxicities. (NCT00864253)
Timeframe: Maximum study drug exposure 106 weeks; data cut off 30 June 2012

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dose ReductionsDose InterruptionsDose Delay
ABI-007 150mg/m^2816145
Dacarbazine 1000mg/m^25117105

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment Using RECIST Response Guidelines

PFS was defined as the time from the randomization date to the start of disease progression or patient death, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not have disease progression or had not died were censored at the last known time that the patient was progression free. In the event of palliative radiotherapy or surgery, they were censored at the last assessment where they were documented to be progression-free prior to the date of radiotherapy or surgery. In follow up, patients who began new anticancer therapy prior to documented progression were censored at the last assessment where they were documented as progression free. Those with two or more missing response assessments prior to a visit with documented disease progression (or death) were censored at the last visit where they were documented to be progression free. (NCT00864253)
Timeframe: Response assessments completed every 8 weeks until disease progression; up to data cut off 30 June 2012; 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
ABI-007 150mg/m^23.7
Dacarbazine 1000mg/m^22.1

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on a Blinded Radiology Assessment of Response Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Guidelines

PFS was defined as the time from the randomization date to the start of disease progression or patient death, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not have disease progression or had not died were censored at the last known time that the patient was progression free. In the event of palliative radiotherapy or surgery, they were censored at the last assessment where they were documented to be progression-free prior to the date of radiotherapy or surgery. In follow up, participants who began new anticancer therapy prior to documented progression were censored at the last assessment where they were documented as progression free. Those with two or more missing response assessments prior to a visit with documented disease progression (or death) were censored at the last visit where they were documented to be progression free. RECIST defines progressive disease as a ≥ 20% increase taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters recorded since the treatment began. (NCT00864253)
Timeframe: Response assessment completed every 8 weeks until disease progression for up to 106 weeks; data cut off 30 June 2012

Interventionmonths (Median)
ABI-007 150mg/m^24.8
Dacarbazine 1000mg/m^22.5

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) for ≥ 16 Weeks, or Confirmed Complete or Partial Response (i.e., Disease Control) Based on a Blinded Radiology Assessment of Response

"Disease control is stable disease (SD) for >=16 weeks + complete response (CR) + partial response (PR). See Outcome #4 for definitions of CR and PR.~RECIST defines SD for target lesions as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, no occurrence of progression disease for non-target lesions, and no new lesions." (NCT00864253)
Timeframe: Response assessment completed every 8 weeks until disease progression; up to data cut-off 30 June 2012

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
ABI-007 150mg/m^239
Dacarbazine 1000mg/m^227

[back to top]

Overall Survival

The survival time for each patient is defined as the time between randomization and death. Patients lost to follow-up or still alive at the date of last evaluation have been censored. (NCT00911443)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 1.6 mg9.3
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 3.2 mg8.6
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 6.4 mg10.3
Dacarbazin + Thymosin-alpha-1 3.2 mg9.3
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha6.6

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression Free Survival is defined as the time from the randomization to progression or death (NCT00911443)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 1.6 mg1.9
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 3.2 mg1.8
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 6.4 mg1.8
Dacarbazin + Thymosin-alpha-1 3.2 mg2.0
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha1.8

[back to top]

Overall Tumor Response

Tumor response is measured according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) computing number of Complete Response plus Partial Response (NCT00911443)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 1.6 mg7
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 3.2 mg10
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha + Thymosin-alpha-1 6.4 mg6
Dacarbazin + Thymosin-alpha-1 3.2 mg12
Dacarbazin + Interferon Alpha4

[back to top]

Change in Target Lesion Tumour Size at Week 12

(NCT00936221)
Timeframe: randomization to week 12

Intervention% change (Median)
Selumetinib 75mg BD + Dacarbazine-8.85
Placebo + Dacarbazine0.22

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Following progression survival data was collected until documentation of death, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up or the final data cut-off, whichever occurred first. (NCT00936221)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until death, withdrawal of consent or the end of the study. The end of the study was defined as the date all AZD6244 patients had been followed for a minimum of 12 months, or the date of final analysis, whichever was later

InterventionDays (Median)
Selumetinib 75mg BD + Dacarbazine424
Placebo + Dacarbazine321

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

PFS is the time from randomisation until the date of objective disease progression as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST version 1.1) or death (by any cause in the absence of progression). Progression is defined using RECIST (v1.1), as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm. (NCT00936221)
Timeframe: From randomization until evidence of RECIST-defined objective disease progression or data cut off, for a minimum of 12 months since start of treatment

InterventionDays (Median)
Selumetinib 75mg BD + Dacarbazine169
Placebo + Dacarbazine92

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

ORR rate is defined as the number (%) of subjects with at least one visit response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) , as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI. CR, Disappearance of all target lesions; PR, ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. Data obtained up until progression, or last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression, was included in the assessment of ORR (NCT00936221)
Timeframe: From randomization until evidence of RECIST-defined objective disease progression or data cut off, for a minimum of 12 months since start of treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ResponseComplete ResponsePartial ResponseNon-responseStable Disease >=6 weeksProgression
Placebo + Dacarbazine12111341024
Selumetinib 75mg BD + Dacarbazine18117271314

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

A progression-free survival (PFS) event was defined as disease progression or death due to any cause. Tumor response (progression) was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria using computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). (NCT01006980)
Timeframe: From randomization (initiated January 2010) to December 30 2010.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with eventsParticipants without events
Dacarbazine18292
Vemurafenib104171

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response was defined as the time between the date of the earliest qualifying response and the date of disease progression or death due to any cause. Duration of response was calculated only for participants who had a best overall response of Complete Response or Partial Response and was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01006980)
Timeframe: From randomization (initiated in January 2010) until December 30, 2010.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Vemurafenib5.49
DacarbazineNA

[back to top]

Time to Confirmed Response

Time to response was defined as the time from randomization to confirmed response (complete response or partial response). (NCT01006980)
Timeframe: From randomization (initiated January 2010) until December 30, 2010.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Vemurafenib1.45
Dacarbazine2.72

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

The intensity of AEs was graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0 (CTCAE) on a five-point scale (Grade 1 to 5: Mild, Moderate, Severe, Life-threatening and Death). A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution, for example is life-threatening, requires hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or requires intervention to prevent one or other of the outcomes listed above. (NCT01006980)
Timeframe: From randomization (initiated January 2010) until December 30, 2010.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventSerious adverse event
Dacarbazine25345
Vemurafenib326110

[back to top]

Overall Survival

An Overall survival event was defined as death due to any cause. The number of participants with overall survival events is reported. (NCT01006980)
Timeframe: From randomization (initiated January 2010) to December 30 2010. Median follow-up time in the vemurafenib group was 3.75 months (range 0.3 to 10.8) and in the dacarbazine group was 2.33 months (range <0.1 to 10.3).

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with eventsParticipants without events
Dacarbazine75261
Vemurafenib43293

[back to top]

Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response or Partial Response

BOR was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Participants who never received study treatment and treated participants without any post-baseline tumor assessments were considered as non-responders. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, all non-target lesions and no new lesion. Any pathological lymph nodes must have had reduction in the short axis to <10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, no progression in non-target lesion and no new lesion. (NCT01006980)
Timeframe: From randomization (initiated January 2010) until December 30, 2010

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
RespondersNon-responders
Dacarbazine12208
Vemurafenib106113

[back to top]

Pre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study Day

The pharmacokinetics of vemurafenib were assessed at the beginning of each 21-day cycle using pre-dose and 2-4 hours post-dose sampling. (NCT01006980)
Timeframe: Plasma samples were collected before the morning dose (troughs) and 2-4 hours after the morning dose at the beginning of each cycle (Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 106, 148 and 190).

Interventionμg/mL (Mean)
Pre-Dose Day 1 (n = 260)Post-Dose Day 1 (n = 255)Pre-Dose Day 22 (n = 204)Post-Dose Day 22 (n = 221)Pre-Dose Day 43 (n = 166)Post-Dose Day 43 (n = 170)Pre-Dose Day 64 (n = 141)Post-Dose Day 64 (n = 138)Pre-Dose Day 106 (n = 77)Post-Dose Day 106 (n = 75)Pre-Dose Day 148 (n = 38)Post-Dose Day 148 (n = 39)Pre-Dose Day 190 (n = 9)Post-Dose Day 190 (n = 9)
Vemurafenib04.353.054.054.454.457.457.755.056.351.853.353.650.5

[back to top]

PFS Rate

PFS was defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.0, as a >=20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of all target lesions, from smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline; or a new lesion; or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. (NCT01028222)
Timeframe: End of study (up to 39 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Nilotinib34.6
DTIC23.1

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.0, as a >=20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of all target lesions, from smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline; or a new lesion; or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. (NCT01028222)
Timeframe: End of study (up to 39 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Nilotinib4.2
DTIC4.2

[back to top]

Time to Objective Response (TOR)

TOR was defined as the time between the start date of treatment until first documented confirmed response of CR or PR determined by RECIST v1.0 based on local investigators' assessment (CT/MRI/photography). Per RECIST, CR: disappearance of all target lesions, all non-target lesions, and no new lesion; PR: a >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions (TLs) taking as a reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of non-TLs, and no new lesions. For CR or PR, tumor measurements must be confirmed by 2nd assessments at least 4 weeks apart. (NCT01028222)
Timeframe: End of study (up to 39 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
NilotinibNA
DTICNA

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR was defined as the proportion of participants with an overall response of CR of any duration, PR of any duration, or stable disease (SD) for a minimum of 12 weeks from start of treatment. Per RECIST, CR: disappearance of all target lesions, all non-target lesions, and no new lesion; PR: a >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions (TLs) taking as a reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of non-TLs, and no new lesions; PD, a >=20% increase in TLs, clearly worsening of non-TLs, or emergence of new lesions; SD: no change or small changes that do not meet previously given criteria for CR, PR or PD. (NCT01028222)
Timeframe: End of study (up to 39 months)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Nilotinib20
DTIC7

[back to top]

Durable Overall Response Rate (DORR)

DORR was defined as the rate of best overall response (CR+PR) lasting at least 12 weeks determined by RECIST v1.0 based on local investigators' assessment (CT/MRI/photography). The duration of ORR responders is computed from the date of first documented response (CR/PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying disease. Per RECIST, CR: disappearance of all target lesions, all non-target lesions, and no new lesion; PR: a >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions (TLs) taking as a reference the baseline sum, no worsening of non-TLs, and no new lesions. For CR or PR, tumor measurements must be confirmed by 2nd assessments at least 4 weeks apart. (NCT01028222)
Timeframe: End of study (up to 39 months)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Nilotinib11
DTIC3

[back to top]

OS Rate

OS was defined as the time from the date of the start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. (NCT01028222)
Timeframe: End of study (up to 39 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Nilotinib63.6
DTIC66.7

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the proportion of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of a confirmed complete response or partial response (CR+PR) determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0) based on local investigators' assessment (CT/MRI/photography). Per RECIST, CR: disappearance of all target lesions, all non-target lesions, and no new lesion; PR: a >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions (TLs) taking as a reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of non-TLs, and no new lesions. For CR or PR, tumor measurements must be confirmed by 2nd assessments at least 4 weeks apart. (NCT01028222)
Timeframe: End of study (up to 39 months)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Nilotinib11
DTIC3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of the start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. (NCT01028222)
Timeframe: End of study (up to 39 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Nilotinib18.0
DTIC22.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Toxicity or Grade 4 Adverse Events Via CTCAE Version 3.0

Number of participants with toxicity as defined as an underlying risk of >33% Grade 3 (non blood/bone marrow) or Grade 4 adverse events that are related to therapy, assessed by NCI CTCAE version 3.0 (NCT01100528)
Timeframe: up to 32 weeks from start of study

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I: Dacarbazine + Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b2

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Disease-free Survival (DFS)

DFS will be calculated from the date treatment starts to the date of documented recurrence or death. It will be summarized using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Treatment will be considered relatively ineffective in this population if the underlying 2-year DFS is <60%, whereas the combination will be considered promising if the underlying rate is >80%. (NCT01100528)
Timeframe: 5 years from time-of-enrollment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I: Dacarbazine + Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b8

[back to top]

36 Month Progression Free Survival Rate of Patients Receiving 4 Cycles of ABVD Versus Patients Receiving 2 Cycles of ABVD and 2 Cycles of BEACOPP and Radiation.

All patients received an initial 2-28 day cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) on Days 1 and 15. After the first 2 cycles of ABVD, PET/CT was performed and submitted for central review (cycle 2, days 23-25) and determined whether patients would receive 2 cycles of escalated BEACOPP and involved-field RT (IFRT) or an additional 2 cycles of ABVD. PFS for each patient is measured as the time from registration on trial to the first incident of death or progression. The PFS rate at 36 months is calculated as the number of patients who have a progression-free survival time greater than 36 months divided by the total number of patients that started treatment. For this endpoint, we compare the PFS rate between patients who received 4 cycles of ABVD and patients who received 2 cycles of ABVD and 2 cycles of IFRT. (NCT01132807)
Timeframe: at 36 months

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Treatment (ABVD:4 Cycles).91
Escalated BEACOPP and Involved Field Radiation Therapy.67

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 36-Months for Patients Who Received 4 Cycles of ABVD

The primary objective of this trial is to estimate the 3 year PFS in patients who received 4 cycles of ABVD. PFS for each patient is measured as the time from registration on trial to the first incident of death or progression. The PFS at 36 months is calculated as the number of patients who have a progression-free survival time greater than 36 months divided by the total number of patients that started treatment. For this endpoint, all patients that received 4 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) are included. (NCT01132807)
Timeframe: 36 Months

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
Treatment (ABVD: 4 Cycles).91

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

A Complete Response (CR) was defined as having the following conditions: 1. A complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. 2. In patients with a PET scan that was positive before therapy, a post-treatment residual mass of any size is permitted as long as it is PET-negative. A Complete Response rate was defined as the number of patients who achieved a CR divided by the number of patients that were eligible for analysis in each group. The CR rate was calculated for patients that completed 4 cycles of ABVD and for patients that completed 2 cycles of ABVD and 2 cycles of BEACOPP and IFRT. (NCT01132807)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Treatment (ABVD: 4 Cycles).97
Escalated BEACOPP and Involved Field Radiation Therapy.85

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) (for Phase 2)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization of a participant until (1) the date of first documented progression of such participant's disease based on Investigator assessments according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST v. 1.1) or (2) the date of such participant's death due to any cause. Progression was defined as at least a 20% increase or 5 mm increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions, based on Investigator assessment according to RECIST 1.1. If missing assessments, imputed dates were used in the analysis. (NCT01133977)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization until the date of disease progression or death (whichever was earlier) or up to approximately 2 years

InterventionWeeks (Median)
20 mg Lenvatinib + Dacarbazine (Phase 2)19.1
Dacarbazine (Phase 2)7.0

[back to top]

Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) of Lenvatinib Administered in Combination With Dacarbazine (for Phase 1b)

DLTs were defined as clinically significant adverse events (AEs) occurring less than or equal to 21 days after commencing study treatment and considered by the Investigator to be possibly or probably related to study treatment. (NCT01133977)
Timeframe: From Day 1 through 21 days (one cycle)

,,
InterventionParticipants with DLT (Number)
Participants with DLTsGrade 3 hypertensionGrade 3 febrile neutropeniaGrade 3 thrombocytopenia
16 mg Lenvatinib + Dacarbazine (Phase 1b)0000
20 mg Lenvatinib + Dacarbazine (Phase 1b)1100
22 mg Lenvatinib + Dacarbazine (Phase 1b)2111

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events/Serious Adverse Events (AEs/SAEs)

Safety assessments consisted of monitoring and recording all AEs, including all Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE v. 4.0) grades, and SAEs; regular monitoring of hematology, blood chemistry, and urine values; periodic measurement of vital signs and electrocardiograms (ECGs); and performance of physical examinations. Details of AEs and SAEs are provided in the reported adverse event section. (NCT01133977)
Timeframe: From signing of informed consent up to 30 days after the last dose, up to approximately 2 years

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
16 mg Lenvatinib + Dacarbazine (Phase 1b)32
20 mg Lenvatinib + Dacarbazine (Phase 1b)74
20 mg Lenvatinib + Dacarbazine (Phase 2)4016
22 mg Lenvatinib + Dacarbazine (Phase 1b)62
Dacarbazine (Phase 2)311

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (Evaluable Randomized Patients)

The primary analysis will be performed among the Gnaq/Gna11 mutant patients. A stratified logrank test will be performed stratified by mutation status, M stage, and number of prior systemic therapies for metastatic disease. Due to the potential for a large number of strata and small strata sizes, the standard asymptotic stratified logrank test will be verified for robustness utilizing a permutation reference distribution. (NCT01143402)
Timeframe: The time from randomization to death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm I (Temozolomide)9.1
Arm II (Selumetinib)11.8

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Evaluable Randomized Patients)

The primary analysis will be performed among the Gnaq/Gna11 mutant patients. A stratified logrank test will be performed stratified by mutation status, M stage, and number of prior systemic therapies for metastatic disease. Due to the potential for a large number of strata and small strata sizes, the standard asymptotic stratified logrank test will be verified for robustness utilizing a permutation reference distribution. (NCT01143402)
Timeframe: The time from randomization to the earlier date of objective disease progression per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria or death due to any cause in the absence of progression, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionweeks (Median)
Arm I (Temozolomide)7
Arm II (Selumetinib)15.9

[back to top]

Safety and Toxicity Profile (Participants With Grade 3 4 5 Adverse Event)

To determine the safety and toxicity profile of rIL-21 and dacarbazine in patients with chemotherapy and immunotherapy-naive metastatic or recurrent malignant melanoma. Adverse events were measured according to the Common Terminology Criteria version 4.0 for Adverse Events. Number of patients with worst adverse event of grade 3 4 or 5 were counted for both rIL-21 and Dacarbazine arms. (NCT01152788)
Timeframe: Over study period, up to 22 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
rIL-2117
Dacarbazine6

[back to top]

Response Rate

Tumour response is defined per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumour markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures < 10 mm (Note: continue to record the measurement even if < 10 mm and considered CR). Residual lesions (other than nodes < 10 mm) thought to be non-malignant should be further investigated (by cytology or PET scans) before CR can be accepted. Confirmation of complete response is not required in this randomized study. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumour lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Confirmation of partial response is not required in this randomized study. Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01152788)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment until the end of treatment (before disease progression)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
rIL-2113.3
Dacarbazine14.3

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression free survival is defined as the time from randomization to the time of the first documented progression event or death by any cause. A patient who stops treatment with study drug and goes on to receive alternative therapy prior to documentation of disease progression, will be censored at the date alternative therapy began. If a patient has not progressed or received alternative therapy, progression free survival (PFS) will be censored at the date of the last disease assessment. (NCT01152788)
Timeframe: From randomization to progression or death, up to 22 months

Interventionyears (Median)
rIL-211.87
Dacarbazine2.04

[back to top]

Overall Survival

For patients who have died, overall survival is calculated in months from the day of randomization to date of death. Otherwise, survival is censored at the last day the patient is known alive. (NCT01152788)
Timeframe: From randomization to death of any cause, up to 22 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
rIL-216.6
Dacarbazine7.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from Baseline visit to the time of death from any cause. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology and expressed in months. (NCT01164007)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 6 years (assessed at Baseline, every 12 weeks on treatment, thereafter every 3 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dacarbazine + Bevacizumab11.41

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) With CR or PR According to RECIST

Tumor assessments were performed using RECIST. DOR was defined as the time from first assessment of CR or PR to the time of death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to smallest sum on study or the appearance of new lesion(s). CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions with normalization of tumor markers. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. DOR was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology and expressed in months. (NCT01164007)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 6 years (assessed at Baseline, every 12 weeks on treatment, thereafter every 3 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dacarbazine + Bevacizumab16.89

[back to top]

DOR With CR, PR, or SD According to RECIST

Tumor assessments were performed using RECIST. DOR was defined as the time from first assessment of CR, PR, or SD to the time of death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to smallest sum on study or the appearance of new lesion(s). CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions with normalization of tumor markers. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression, using smallest sum of LD on study as reference. DOR was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology and expressed in months. (NCT01164007)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 6 years (assessed at Baseline, every 12 weeks on treatment, thereafter every 3 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dacarbazine + Bevacizumab12.52

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment

The percentage of participants who discontinued treatment as a result of death, adverse event, disease progression, loss to follow-up, non-compliance, or consent withdrawal was reported. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to smallest sum on study or the appearance of new lesion(s). (NCT01164007)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 6 years (assessed at Baseline, every 12 weeks on treatment, thereafter every 3 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dacarbazine + Bevacizumab91.89

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

TTF was defined as the time from start of treatment to the time of treatment discontinuation as a result of death, adverse event, disease progression, loss to follow-up, non-compliance, or consent withdrawal was reported. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to smallest sum on study or the appearance of new lesion(s). TTF was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology and expressed in months. (NCT01164007)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 6 years (assessed at Baseline, every 12 weeks on treatment, thereafter every 3 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dacarbazine + Bevacizumab3.05

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP) According to RECIST

Tumor assessments were performed using RECIST. TTP was defined as the time from Baseline visit to time of death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to smallest sum on study or the appearance of new lesion(s). TTP was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology and expressed in months. (NCT01164007)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 6 years (assessed at Baseline, every 12 weeks on treatment, thereafter every 3 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dacarbazine + Bevacizumab5.48

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression According to RECIST

Tumor assessments were performed using RECIST. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to smallest sum on study or the appearance of new lesion(s). The percentage of participants who died or demonstrated disease progression was reported. (NCT01164007)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 6 years (assessed at Baseline, every 12 weeks on treatment, thereafter every 3 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dacarbazine + Bevacizumab81.08

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

Tumor assessments were performed using RECIST. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions with normalization of tumor markers. PR was defined as greater than or equal to (≥) 30 percent (%) decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Both were to be confirmed at a follow-up visit at least 4 weeks from the initial assessment of CR or PR. The percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR during the study was reported. (NCT01164007)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 6 years (assessed at Baseline, every 12 weeks on treatment, thereafter every 3 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dacarbazine + Bevacizumab18.92

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Died

The percentage of participants who died from any cause was reported. (NCT01164007)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 6 years (assessed at Baseline, every 12 weeks on treatment, thereafter every 3 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dacarbazine + Bevacizumab81.08

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Confirmed Partial Response (PR) as Assessed by the Investigator: Randomized Phase

A participant was defined as a responder if he/she achieved either a CR (the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be <10 mm in the short axis.) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum of the diameters [e.g., percent change from Baseline]). Response was evaluated by an investigator per RECIST, version 1.1. A participant without a post-Baseline assessment of response was considered a non-responder. Confirmation, per RECIST version 1.1, requires a confimatory disease assessment of CR or PR at least 28 days after the initial disease assessment of CR or PR. (NCT01227889)
Timeframe: From randomization until the first documented evidence of a confirmed complete response or partial response (median of 6.6 weeks)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRPR
DTIC 1000 mg/m^2 in RP411
GSK2118436 150 mg BID2686

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR or PR as Assessed by an Independent Radiologist: Randomized Phase

A participant was defined as a responder if he/she achieved either a CR (the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be <10 mm in the short axis.) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum of the diameters [e.g., percent change from Baseline]). Response was evaluated by an independent radiologist per RECIST, version 1.1. A participant without a post-Baseline assessment of response was considered a non-responder. Confirmation, per RECIST version 1.1, requires a confimatory disease assessment of CR or PR at least 28 days after the initial disease assessment of CR or PR. (NCT01227889)
Timeframe: From randomization until the first documented evidence of a confirmed complete response or partial response (median of 12.0 weeks)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRPR
DTIC 1000 mg/m^2 in RP13
GSK2118436 150 mg BID687

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Non-melanoma Skin Lesions: Randomized Phase

Dermatological examinations were performed by the investigator, or at the discretion of the investigator, referred to a dermatologist. The number of participants with non-melanoma skin lessions was assessed from the time of Screening until study completion or discontinuation from the study for any reason. (NCT01227889)
Timeframe: From Screening until study completion or discontinuation from the study (up to 9.9 months)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of Subjects with EventNumber of Events
DTIC 1000 mg/m^2 in RP00
GSK2118436 150 mg BID1424

[back to top]

Duration of Response as Assessed by an Independent Radiologist: Randomized Phase

Duration of response for participants with either a CR (the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be <10 mm in the short axis.) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum of the diameters [e.g., percent change from Baseline]) was defined as the time from the first documented evidence of a PR or CR until the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started (e.g., percent change from nadir, where nadir is defined as the smallest sum of diameters recorded since treatment start). In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm. NA indicates that data is not available. (NCT01227889)
Timeframe: Time from the first documented evidence of PR or CR until the first documented sign of disease progression or death due to any cause (up to 7.4 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2118436 150 mg BID5.5
DTIC 1000 mg/m^2 in RPNA

[back to top]

Duration of Response as Assessed by the Investigator: Crossover Phase

Duration of response for participants with either a CR (the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be <10 mm in the short axis.) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum of the diameters [e.g., percent change from Baseline]) was defined as the time from the first documented evidence of a PR or CR until the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started (e.g., percent change from nadir, where nadir is defined as the smallest sum of diameters recorded since treatment start). In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm. (NCT01227889)
Timeframe: Time from the first documented evidence of PR or CR until the first documented sign of disease progression or death due to any cause (up to 6.4 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK25118436 in Crossover Phase4.4

[back to top]

Duration of Response as Assessed by the Investigator: Randomized Phase

Duration of response for participants with either a CR (the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be <10 mm in the short axis.) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum of the diameters [e.g., percent change from Baseline]) was defined as the time from the first documented evidence of a PR or CR until the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started (e.g., percent change from nadir, where nadir is defined as the smallest sum of diameters recorded since treatment start). In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm. (NCT01227889)
Timeframe: Time from the first documented evidence of PR or CR until the first documented sign of disease progression or death due to any cause (up to 65.6 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2118436 150 mg BID9.2
DTIC 1000 mg/m^2 in RP8.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause. For participants who did not die, overall survival was censored at the date of last contact. (NCT01227889)
Timeframe: Time interval between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause (up to 22.1 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2118436 150 mg BID20.0
DTIC 1000 mg/m^2 in RP15.6

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by an Independent Radiologist: Randomized Phase

PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression or the date of death due to any cause. Disease progression was based on radiographic or photographic evidence, and assessments were made by an independent radiologist according to RECIST version 1.1. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started (e.g., percent change from nadir, where nadir is defined as the smallest sum of diameters recorded since treatment start). In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm. For participants who did not progress or die, PFS was censored at the date of last contact. (NCT01227889)
Timeframe: Time interval between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression or the date of death due to any cause (up to 9.9 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2118436 150 mg BID6.7
DTIC 1000 mg/m^2 in RP2.9

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator

PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression or the date of death due to any cause. Disease progression was based on radiographic or photographic evidence, and assessments were made by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started (e.g., percent change from nadir, where nadir is defined as the smallest sum of diameters recorded since treatment start). In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 millimeters (mm). For participants who did not progress or die, PFS was censored at the date of last contact. Data are presented as median and 96% confidence interval. (NCT01227889)
Timeframe: Time interval between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression or the date of death due to any cause (up to 9.9 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK2118436 150 mg BID6.9
DTIC 1000 mg/m^2 in RP2.7

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS2) as Assessed by the Investigator: Crossover Phase

PFS2 is defined as the time from the first dose of GSK2118436, in participants randomized to DTIC who crossed over to GSK2118436 after initial progression, to the earliest date of radiographic or photographic disease progression or death due to any cause. Disease progression was based on radiographic or photographic evidence, and assessments were made by the investigator according to RECIST version 1.1. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started (e.g., percent change from nadir, where nadir is defined as the smallest sum of diameters recorded since treatment start). In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm. For participants who did not progress or die, PFS was censored at the date of last contact. (NCT01227889)
Timeframe: Time from first dose of GSK2118436 in participants who crossover after initial progression to the earliest date of radiographical or photographical PD or death due to any cause (up to 6.4 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
GSK25118436 in Crossover Phase4.3

[back to top]

Agreement Rate for V600E Mutation Validation of the BRAF Mutation Assay

Analytical and clinical validation of the companion diagnostic (cDx) assay was performed to determine the extent of agreement between the bioMerieux cDx assay (THxID BRAF Assay) and the Clinical Trial Assay (CTA) to detect BRAF mutations to determine participant eligibility into the study. Skin tissue samples collected at the Screening visit were used for this analysis. Multiple specimen per participant were analyzed. (NCT01227889)
Timeframe: Screening

InterventionPercent agreement (Number)
Agreement for V600EAgreement for V600KAgreement for mutation negativeAgreement for overall
All Screened Participants96.7090.0095.0094.90

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Confirmed Partial Response (PR) as Assessed by the Investigator: Crossover Phase

A participant was defined as a responder if he/she achieved either a CR (the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be <10 mm in the short axis.) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum of the diameters [e.g., percent change from Baseline]). Response was evaluated by an investigator per RECIST, version 1.1. A participant without a post-Baseline assessment of response was considered a non-responder. Confirmation, per RECIST version 1.1, requires a confimatory disease assessment of CR or PR at least 28 days after the initial disease assessment of CR or PR. (NCT01227889)
Timeframe: From randomization until the first documented evidence of a confirmed complete response or partial response (up to 6.4 months)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRPR
GSK25118436 in Crossover Phase012

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression, or date of death (whichever occurred first). The date of disease progression was defined as the date of radiologic disease progression as assessed by the investigator or designee based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. Participants who did not have an event (i.e., participants who were lost to follow-up or who did not progress or die at the date of data cut-off), were censored. Participants who discontinued study treatment without disease progression were censored on the date of their last radiological assessment (scan date). (NCT01327885)
Timeframe: Randomization (day 1) to the date of first documentation of disease progression, or date of death (whichever occurred first), up to 5 years 5 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate2.6
Arm B: Dacarbazine2.6

[back to top]

Progression-Free Rate at 12 Weeks (PFR12wks)

The PFR12wks was defined as the percentage of participants who were still alive without disease progression at 12 weeks from the date of randomization. Tumor assessment by the investigator or designee was based on RECIST criteria 1.1. (NCT01327885)
Timeframe: From date of randomization start until Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate33.3
Arm B: Dacarbazine28.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time in months from the date of treatment start until death, regardless of cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, participants were censored either at the date that participant was last known to be alive or the date of study cut-off, whichever was earlier. Participants who died on the date of randomization had a survival time of 0.5 day. Allocation of randomization numbers were performed based upon the following stratification factors: (a) Histology (adipocytic [ADI] or leiomyosarcoma [LMS]), (b) Region (Region 1: USA and Canada; or Region 2: Western Europe, Australia, Israel; or Region 3: Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Asia), and (c) Number of prior regimens for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) (2 or greater than [>] 2 prior regimens). (NCT01327885)
Timeframe: From date of treatment start until date of death from any cause, up to 5 years 5 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate13.5
Arm B: Dacarbazine11.5

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

CBR was defined as the percentage of participants who have best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR), or partial response (PR), or duration of stable disease (dSD) greater than or equal to 11 weeks, between Arm A and Arm B. CBR was estimated by treatment arm based on the tumor response evaluation performed by the PI or designee according to RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameter. (NCT01327885)
Timeframe: From date of treatment start (Day 1) until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, participant's choice to stop study treatment, up to 5 years 5 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate46.1
Arm B: Dacarbazine47.8

[back to top]

Duration of Response

"Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of initial documentation of a response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (or relapse for participants who experience CR during the study) or death.~Independent Data Monitoring Committee performed ongoing safety monitoring and conducted the interim analysis after 189 death events and 329 PFS events were observed." (NCT01343277)
Timeframe: approximately 2 years 4 months (From Study start date [27 May 2011] up to interim analysis data cut-off [16 September 2013])

InterventionMonths (Median)
Trabectedin6.47
Dacarbazine4.17

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

The objective response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a Complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as best responses. according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST). CR defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to less than 10 millimeter (mm). PR defined as at least 30 percent (%) decrease in sum of the diameters of the target lesions taking as reference the Baseline sum diameters. Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study for at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. Independent Data Monitoring Committee performed ongoing safety monitoring and conducted the interim analysis after 189 death events and 329 PFS events were observed. (NCT01343277)
Timeframe: approximately 2 years 4 months (From Study start date [27 May 2011] up to interim analysis data cut-off [16 September 2013])

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Trabectedin9.9
Dacarbazine6.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

The OS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study drug to date of death from any cause. If the participant is alive or the vital status is unknown, the participant will be censored at the date the participant will be last known to be alive. (NCT01343277)
Timeframe: approximately 3 years 8 months (From Study start date [27 May 2011] up to final analysis data cut-off [05 January 2015]

InterventionMonths (Median)
Trabectedin13.73
Dacarbazine13.14

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

The Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was assessed as median number of months from baseline until the first documented sign of disease progression (increase in disease; radiographic, clinical, or both) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred earlier. Independent Data Monitoring Committee performed ongoing safety monitoring and conducted the interim analysis after 189 death events and 329 PFS events were observed. (NCT01343277)
Timeframe: approximately 2 years 4 months (From Study start date [27 May 2011] up to interim analysis data cut-off [16 September 2013])

InterventionMonths (Median)
Trabectedin4.21
Dacarbazine1.54

[back to top]

Time to Progression

"Time interval in months between the date of randomization and the date of disease progression or death due to progression, whichever occurred first.~Independent Data Monitoring Committee performed ongoing safety monitoring and conducted the interim analysis after 189 death events and 329 PFS events were observed." (NCT01343277)
Timeframe: approximately 2 years 4 months (From Study start date [27 May 2011] up to interim analysis data cut-off [16 September 2013])

InterventionMonths (Median)
Trabectedin4.24
Dacarbazine1.54

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. (NCT01343277)
Timeframe: approximately 3 years 8 months (From Study start date [27 May 2011] up to final analysis data cut-off [05 January 2015])

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Adverse Events (AEs)
Dacarbazine52166
Trabectedin155375

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

"Overall Survival was defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of death from any cause or the date of last follow-up for living patients.~OS curves were estimated with the Kaplan - Meier (K-M) method and treatments were compared with a two - sided log - rank test." (NCT01359956)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine/Interferon + Fotemustine/Dacarbazine7.9
Dacarbazine/Interferon + Dacarbazine8.6
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine/Interferon+Dacarbazine/Interferon9.1
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine + Dacarbazine7.7

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"Progression Free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of progression of disease or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, or date of last follow-up for patients without progression and alive at the end of the study.~PFS curves were estimated with the Kaplan - Meier (K-M) method and treatments were compared with a two-sided log-rank test." (NCT01359956)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine/Interferon + Fotemustine/Dacarbazine2.7
Dacarbazine/Interferon + Dacarbazine2.5
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine/Interferon+Dacarbazine/Interferon2.8
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine + Dacarbazine2.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"Overall Response Rate (ORR) included Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR).~Complete Response (CR) was defined as disappearance of all symptoms and signs of all measurable disease, lasting for at least four weeks, without appearance of new lesions.~Partial Response (PR) was defined as a > 50% reduction in the sum of the products of the perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions, lasting for at least four weeks, without appearance of new lesions or enlargement of existing lesions." (NCT01359956)
Timeframe: 18 weeks from start of therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine/Interferon + Fotemustine/Dacarbazine32
Dacarbazine/Interferon + Dacarbazine33
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine/Interferon+Dacarbazine/Interferon34
Fotemustine/Dacarbazine + Dacarbazine31

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Rate

Progression-free survival is defined as the time from study entry to lymphoma progression or death from any cause. Proportion of patients who are progression-free and alive at 36 months will be reported. Progression is defined as appearance of any new lesions more than 1.5 cm in any axis, at least a 50% increase from nadir in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or at least 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis. (NCT01390584)
Timeframe: Assessed at 36 months

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
ABVD + INRTNA
ABVD + BEACOPP + INRTNA

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive. (NCT01390584)
Timeframe: Assessed at 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
ABVD + INRTNA
ABVD + BEACOPP + INRTNA

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who Are PET Negative After Induction Treatment

(NCT01390584)
Timeframe: Assessed at end of Cycle 2

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Step 1: Induction Tx0.8

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR) Rate After Induction Treatment

Complete response (CR) is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy. (NCT01390584)
Timeframe: Assessed at end of Cycle 2

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Step 1: Induction Tx1.0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival at 36 Months Among Patients Who Are PET Positive After Induction Treatment

Progression-free survival is defined as the time from study entry to lymphoma progression or death from any cause. Proportion of patients who are progression-free and alive at 36 months will be reported. Progression is defined as appearance of any new lesions more than 1.5 cm in any axis, at least a 50% increase from nadir in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or at least 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis. (NCT01390584)
Timeframe: Assessed at 36 months

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
ABVD + BEACOPP + INRTNA

[back to top]

Participants' Response

Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all clinical evidence of active tumors for a minimum of 8 weeks. Partial Response (PR): 50% or greater decrease in sum of products all measured lesions persisting for at least 4 weeks. No Change: Steady state or change of +/- 25% of tumor size and no progression for minimum of 8 weeks with no appearance of new lesions. Progressive Disease: > 25 % increase in size of any measurable lesion or appearance of significant new lesions. (NCT01404936)
Timeframe: After 6 courses (3 months)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponseUncomfirmed Complete ResponsePartial ResponseProgressive Disease
Interferon-2A + Chemotherapy23231

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

"The number of participants achieving a Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR) at the end of therapy as measured via PET/CT response. Response is evaluated using the Revised International Working Group Criteria.~CR: Disappearance of all evidence of disease~PR: Regression of measurable disease and no new sites" (NCT01534078)
Timeframe: End of Therapy (median duration of four months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial Response
Treatment Arm310

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

Complete response rate at the end of therapy as measured by Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT). Response is evaluated using Revised International Working Group Criteria. Complete response is defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease. (NCT01534078)
Timeframe: End of Therapy (median duration of four months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Arm31

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate After One Cycle of Brentuximab

"The number of participants achieving a Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR) after one cycle of Brentuximab monotherapy as measured via PET/CT response. Response is evaluated using the Revised International Working Group Criteria.~CR: Disappearance of all evidence of disease~PR: Regression of measurable disease and no new sites" (NCT01534078)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Arm18

[back to top]

Grade III or IV Adverse Events

A summary of the grade 3 or 4 adverse events experienced by participants as determined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. The data is shown as the number of participants that experienced at least one grade 3 or 4 adverse event for each of the specified toxicities. (NCT01534078)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Peripheral sensory neuropathyNeutrophil count decreasedFatigueNauseaAnemiaWhite blood cell decreasedAbdominal painDiarrheaFebrile neutropeniaVomitingMucositis oralWeight lossDehydrationHypertensionInfections and infestations - Other, specifyBlood and lymphatic system disorders - Other, spec
Treatment Arm821312621121121111

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Tumor evaluation will be performed every 8 weeks from day 1 of cycle 1 (+/- 1 week) while on therapy assessed by RECIST 1.0 criteria. (NCT01542255)
Timeframe: From date of registration until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months

Interventionweeks (Median)
Single Arm3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Surviving at 1 Year

Survival rate=percentage of participants surviving at 1 year following start of study drug. Every effort was made to collect survival data on all patients, including those withdrawn from treatment for any reason. If the death of a patient was not reported, the patient's last known alive date was recorded. Confidence intervals were computed using the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT01681212)
Timeframe: At 1 year from start of study drug

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ipilimumab, 10 mg/kg + Dacarbazine, 850 mg/m^266.7

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Life Assessed by Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Melanoma Trial Outcome Index (FACT-M TOI) at Day 1 of Pre-Specified Cycles and End of Treatment (EOT)

QoL assessed using FACT-M assessment tool. This includes 27-item FACT-G questionnaire which consists of 24 questions; 7 relating to PWB, 7 relating to SWB, 6 relating to EWB and 7 relating to FWB. Also, it includes melanoma-specific subscale consists of 16 questions for MS and 8 questions for the MSS. Each of these questions could have a response of Not at all, a little bit, somewhat, quite a bit and very much. The responses were given a value between 0 and 4 with 4 being best response. The FACT-M Trial Outcome Index (FACT-M TOI) ranges from 0 to a high of 120 and is derived as: FACT-M TOI = PWB Score + FWB Score +MS Score. Higher scores represent a better quality of life. (NCT01693068)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37 and EOT (up to cut-off date [04-Jul-2015])

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 1 Cycle 2Change at Day 1 Cycle 3Change at Day 1 Cycle 4Change at Day 1 Cycle 5Change at Day 1 Cycle 6Change at Day 1 Cycle 7Change at Day 1 Cycle 8Change at Day 1 Cycle 9Change at Day 1 Cycle 10Change at Day 1 Cycle 11Change at Day 1 Cycle 12Change at Day 1 Cycle 13Change at Day 1 Cycle 14Change at Day 1 Cycle 15Change at Day 1 Cycle 16Change at Day 1 Cycle 17Change at Day 1 Cycle 18Change at Day 1 Cycle 19Change at Day 1 Cycle 20Change at Day 1 Cycle 21Change at Day 1 Cycle 22Change at Day 1 Cycle 23Change at Day 1 Cycle 24Change at Day 1 Cycle 25Change at Day 1 Cycle 26Change at Day 1 Cycle 27Change at Day 1 Cycle 28Change at EOT
Dacarbazine90.35-3.33-0.691.54-0.86-3.29-2.070.83-1.93-1.10-2.90-2.400.800.001.600.612.503.002.504.003.504.003.002.503.503.003.003.00-8.18

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation or TEAEs Leading to Death

AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this the study drug. An AE was defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 33 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. TEAEs were to be reported separately for dacarbazine, pimasertib and pimasertib (crossover) reporting arms. (NCT01693068)
Timeframe: Baseline up to cut-off date (04-Jul-2015)

,,
Interventionsubjects (Number)
TEAEsSerious TEAEsTEAEs Leading to DiscontinuationTEAEs Leading To Death
Dacarbazine601234
Pimasertib13074616
Pimasertib (Crossover)4126166

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest

Adverse events of special interest included ocular retinal vein occlusion, serious retinal detachment or similar retinal abnormality characterized by accumulation of serous fluid in the retina, creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation and isoenzyme TEAE of Special Interest (Grade >=2) and acute renal failure (Grade >=2). Subjects were presented under 3 reporting groups: Dacarbazine group: for subjects who received at least 1 dose of dacarbazine; Pimasertib group: for subjects who received at least 1 dose of pimasertib; Pimasertib (Crossover) group: for subjects who were initially randomized and received dacarbazine, but crossed over to pimasertib treatment on progression of their disease. (NCT01693068)
Timeframe: Baseline up to cut-off date (04-Jul-2015)

,,
Interventionsubjects (Number)
Retinal vein occlusionSerious retinal detachmentCPK/Isoenzyme TEAE of Special Interest (>=Grade 2)Acute renal failure (Grade >= 2)
Dacarbazine0001
Pimasertib576749
Pimasertib (Crossover)221242

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Life Assessed by Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Melanoma Trial Outcome Index (FACT-M TOI) at Day 1 of Pre-Specified Cycles and End of Treatment (EOT)

QoL assessed using FACT-M assessment tool. This includes 27-item FACT-G questionnaire which consists of 24 questions; 7 relating to PWB, 7 relating to SWB, 6 relating to EWB and 7 relating to FWB. Also, it includes melanoma-specific subscale consists of 16 questions for MS and 8 questions for the MSS. Each of these questions could have a response of Not at all, a little bit, somewhat, quite a bit and very much. The responses were given a value between 0 and 4 with 4 being best response. The FACT-M Trial Outcome Index (FACT-M TOI) ranges from 0 to a high of 120 and is derived as: FACT-M TOI = PWB Score + FWB Score +MS Score. Higher scores represent a better quality of life. (NCT01693068)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37 and EOT (up to cut-off date [04-Jul-2015])

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 1 Cycle 2Change at Day 1 Cycle 3Change at Day 1 Cycle 4Change at Day 1 Cycle 5Change at Day 1 Cycle 6Change at Day 1 Cycle 7Change at Day 1 Cycle 8Change at Day 1 Cycle 9Change at Day 1 Cycle 10Change at Day 1 Cycle 11Change at Day 1 Cycle 12Change at Day 1 Cycle 13Change at Day 1 Cycle 14Change at Day 1 Cycle 15Change at Day 1 Cycle 16Change at Day 1 Cycle 17Change at Day 1 Cycle 18Change at Day 1 Cycle 19Change at Day 1 Cycle 20Change at Day 1 Cycle 21Change at Day 1 Cycle 22Change at Day 1 Cycle 23Change at Day 1 Cycle 24Change at Day 1 Cycle 25Change at Day 1 Cycle 26Change at Day 1 Cycle 28Change at Day 1 Cycle 30Change at Day 1 Cycle 31Change at Day 1 Cycle 32Change at Day 1 Cycle 33Change at Day 1 Cycle 35Change at Day 1 Cycle 36Change at Day 1 Cycle 37Change at EOT
Pimasertib94.07-4.40-7.99-7.97-4.37-9.15-8.99-15.09-13.79-12.37-13.95-11.95-13.57-18.55-13.59-13.15-10.66-5.72-4.94-2.330.00-1.40-13.36-2.00-1.000.001.001.00-3.00-4.00-3.000.000.00-3.00-10.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Life Assessed by Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Melanoma Total Score (FACT-M TS) at Day 1 of Pre-Specified Cycles and End of Treatment (EOT)

QoL assessed using Function Assessment Cancer Therapy-melanoma (FACT-M) assessment tool. This includes 27-item FACT-General (FACT-G) questionnaire which consists of 24 questions;7 relating to physical well-being (PWB),7 relating to social/family well-being (SWB),6 relating to emotional well-being (EWB) and 7 relating to functional well-being (FWB). Also, it includes melanoma-specific subscale consists of 16 questions for Melanoma Subscale (MS) and 8 questions for Melanoma Surgery Scale (MSS).Each of these questions could have a response of Not at all, a little bit, somewhat, quite a bit and very much. The responses were given a value between 0 and 4 with 4 being best response. The FACT-M Total Score (FACT-M TS) ranges from 0 to 172 and is derived as follows: FACT-M TS= PWB Score + SWB Score + EWB Score + FWB Score + MS Score. Higher scores represent a better quality of life. (NCT01693068)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37 and EOT (up to cut-off date [04-Jul-2015])

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 1 Cycle 2Change at Day 1 Cycle 3Change at Day 1 Cycle 4Change at Day 1 Cycle 5Change at Day 1 Cycle 6Change at Day 1 Cycle 7Change at Day 1 Cycle 8Change at Day 1 Cycle 9Change at Day 1 Cycle 10Change at Day 1 Cycle 11Change at Day 1 Cycle 12Change at Day 1 Cycle 13Change at Day 1 Cycle 14Change at Day 1 Cycle 15Change at Day 1 Cycle 16Change at Day 1 Cycle 17Change at Day 1 Cycle 18Change at Day 1 Cycle 19Change at Day 1 Cycle 20Change at Day 1 Cycle 21Change at Day 1 Cycle 22Change at Day 1 Cycle 23Change at Day 1 Cycle 24Change at Day 1 Cycle 25Change at Day 1 Cycle 26Change at Day 1 Cycle 28Change at Day 1 Cycle 30Change at Day 1 Cycle 31Change at Day 1 Cycle 32Change at Day 1 Cycle 33Change at Day 1 Cycle 35Change at Day 1 Cycle 36Change at Day 1 Cycle 37Change at EOT
Pimasertib132.24-3.06-6.77-6.54-2.81-8.45-8.84-14.67-13.67-13.26-14.10-10.52-13.38-18.24-11.33-11.18-9.18-3.92-1.151.174.171.32-13.69-3.83-3.83-2.83-0.83-1.83-7.83-7.83-8.83-1.83-3.83-4.83-9.98

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Life Assessed by Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Melanoma Total Score (FACT-M TS) at Day 1 of Pre-Specified Cycles and End of Treatment (EOT)

QoL assessed using Function Assessment Cancer Therapy-melanoma (FACT-M) assessment tool. This includes 27-item FACT-General (FACT-G) questionnaire which consists of 24 questions;7 relating to physical well-being (PWB),7 relating to social/family well-being (SWB),6 relating to emotional well-being (EWB) and 7 relating to functional well-being (FWB). Also, it includes melanoma-specific subscale consists of 16 questions for Melanoma Subscale (MS) and 8 questions for Melanoma Surgery Scale (MSS).Each of these questions could have a response of Not at all, a little bit, somewhat, quite a bit and very much. The responses were given a value between 0 and 4 with 4 being best response. The FACT-M Total Score (FACT-M TS) ranges from 0 to 172 and is derived as follows: FACT-M TS= PWB Score + SWB Score + EWB Score + FWB Score + MS Score. Higher scores represent a better quality of life. (NCT01693068)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37 and EOT (up to cut-off date [04-Jul-2015])

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Day 1 Cycle 2Change at Day 1 Cycle 3Change at Day 1 Cycle 4Change at Day 1 Cycle 5Change at Day 1 Cycle 6Change at Day 1 Cycle 7Change at Day 1 Cycle 8Change at Day 1 Cycle 9Change at Day 1 Cycle 10Change at Day 1 Cycle 11Change at Day 1 Cycle 12Change at Day 1 Cycle 13Change at Day 1 Cycle 14Change at Day 1 Cycle 15Change at Day 1 Cycle 16Change at Day 1 Cycle 17Change at Day 1 Cycle 18Change at Day 1 Cycle 19Change at Day 1 Cycle 20Change at Day 1 Cycle 21Change at Day 1 Cycle 22Change at Day 1 Cycle 23Change at Day 1 Cycle 24Change at Day 1 Cycle 25Change at Day 1 Cycle 26Change at Day 1 Cycle 27Change at Day 1 Cycle 28Change at EOT
Dacarbazine126.20-3.050.604.110.62-3.71-1.101.282.214.401.021.565.5111.509.6010.563.0027.0016.5016.0017.0018.0027.0013.5014.5027.0027.0027.00-7.91

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the duration (in weeks) from randomization until the first progressive disease (PD) observation as assessed by the Investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, or death due to any cause when death occurred within 12 weeks after the last tumor assessment (otherwise censored), whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum since the treatment started (including baseline), or appearance of one or more new lesions, and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT01693068)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to cut-off date (04-Jul-2015)

Interventionweeks (Median)
Dacarbazine6.86
Pimasertib13.00

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Progression-free Survival (PFS) at 6 Months

PFS was defined as the duration (in weeks) from randomization until the first progressive disease (PD) observation as assessed by the Investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, or death due to any cause when death occurred within 12 weeks after the last tumor assessment, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum since the treatment started (including baseline), or appearance of one or more new lesions, and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Percentage of Subjects with PFS at 6 Months were reported. (NCT01693068)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Dacarbazine9.4
Pimasertib17.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Overall Survival (OS) at 12 Months

OS was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death due to any cause. Subjects without a death date were to be censored at the minimum of last known date alive, defined as the latest date available on the electronic case report form, and cut-off date. Percentage of Subjects with OS at 12 months were reported. (NCT01693068)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Dacarbazine44.5
Pimasertib43.3

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR was defined as the percentage of subjects with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) for greater than (>) 3 months assessed by investigator according to RECIST version 1.1. CR: defined as disappearance of all target and all non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than <10 mm. PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters along with absence of new lesions and disease progression in non-target lesions. SD: defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. (NCT01693068)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to cut-off date (04-Jul-2015)

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Dacarbazine15.6
Pimasertib33.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death due to any cause. Subjects without a death date were to be censored at the minimum of last known date alive, defined as the latest date available on the electronic case report form, and cut-off date. (NCT01693068)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until date of death from any cause, assessed up to cut-off date (04-Jul-2015)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dacarbazine10.61
Pimasertib8.87

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of subjects with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.1 criteria. CR: defined as disappearance of all target and all non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters along with absence of new lesions and disease progression in non-target lesions. (NCT01693068)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to cut-off date (04-Jul-2015)

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Dacarbazine14.1
Pimasertib26.9

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Laboratory Parameter, Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Ophthalmologic Findings

Subjects were presented under 3 reporting groups: Dacarbazine group: for subjects who received at least 1 dose of dacarbazine; Pimasertib group: for subjects who received at least 1 dose of pimasertib; Pimasertib (Crossover) group: for subjects who were initially randomized and received dacarbazine, but crossed over to pimasertib treatment on progression of their disease. (NCT01693068)
Timeframe: Baseline up to cut-off date (04-Jul-2015)

,,
Interventionsubjects (Number)
Laboratory ParameterVital SignsECGOphthalmologic Findings
Dacarbazine0000
Pimasertib0000
Pimasertib (Crossover)0000

[back to top]

Final Overall Survival (OS) By Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Expression Status - Initial Treatment Period

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants with an Allred Proportion Score (APS) ≥2 (membranous staining in ≥1% of cells for PD-L1) were considered to be PD-L1 Positive and participants with an APS of 0 or 1 were considered to be PD-L1 Negative. Analysis of OS was not planned or conducted for the switch-to-pembrolizumab treatment groups. Median OS duration based on the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data by PD-L1 tumor expression status is presented. (NCT01704287)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 75 months (Through End of Trial Analysis database cutoff date of 31-Jan-2019)

,,
InterventionMonths (Median)
PD-L1 PositivePD-L1 Negative
Investigator-Choice Chemotherapy (ICC)12.19.3
Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg17.513.4
Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg15.010.5

[back to top]

Final Overall Survival (OS) - Initial Treatment Period

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Analysis of OS was not planned or conducted for the switch-to-pembrolizumab treatment groups. Median OS duration based on the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data is presented. This was the final analysis for OS. (NCT01704287)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 75 months (Through End of Trial Analysis database cutoff date of 31-Jan-2019)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg13.4
Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg14.7
Investigator-Choice Chemotherapy (ICC)11.0

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) - Initial Treatment Period

For participants who demonstrated a confirmed response (Complete Response [CR]: disappearance of all target lesions or Partial Response [PR]: ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1, DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until disease progression or death. DOR for participants who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was to be censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. DOR analysis was based on IRO assessment. Analysis of DOR was not planned or analyzed for the switch-to-pembrolizumab treatment groups. Median DOR for participants who demonstrated a confirmed response is presented. (NCT01704287)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 36 months (Through Final Analysis database cutoff date of 16-Nov-2015)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg22.8
Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kgNA
Investigator-Choice Chemotherapy (ICC)6.8

[back to top]

Best Overall Response (BOR) - Switch-to-Pembrolizumab Treatment Period

The BOR was assessed using RECIST 1.1 and was recorded from the start of the second line of study drug (pembrolizumab) until the last imaging assessment in this period. Response categories included: Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD): at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions; and Stable Disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. For the switch-to-pembrolizumab treatment groups, BOR was based on independent review committee (IRC) assessment. The BOR for switched-to pembrolizumab treatment groups is presented. (NCT01704287)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 36 months (Through Final Analysis database cutoff date of 16-Nov-2015)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseNot EvaluableNo Assessment
ICC→Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg4.413.311.155.613.32.2
ICC→Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg1.917.015.154.711.30.0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Initial Treatment Period

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per Response Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must have also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. Analysis of PFS was based on an integrated radiology and oncology (IRO) assessment and was not planned or conducted for the switch-to-pembrolizumab treatment groups. Median PFS based on the product limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data is presented. This was the final analysis for PFS. (NCT01704287)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 36 months (Through Final Analysis database cutoff date of 16-Nov-2015)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg2.9
Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg3.0
Investigator-Choice Chemotherapy (ICC)2.8

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) - Initial Treatment Period

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) as assessed using RECIST 1.1. Analysis of ORR was not planned or conducted for the switch-to-pembrolizumab treatment groups. The percentage of participants who experienced a CR or PR is presented. This was the final analysis for ORR. (NCT01704287)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 36 months (Through Final Analysis database cutoff date of 16-Nov-2015)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg22.2
Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg27.6
Investigator-Choice Chemotherapy (ICC)4.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE) - Overall Study

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition which was temporally associated with the use of study drug, was also an AE. Participants were included in the treatment group in which an AE was experienced. The number of participants who experienced at least one AE is presented. (NCT01704287)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 75 months (Through End of Trial Analysis database cutoff date of 31-Jan-2019)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg172
Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg179
ICC Only71
ICC→Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg52
ICC→Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg45
ICC→Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg (After Switch to Pembrolizumab)53
ICC→Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg (After Switch to Pembrolizumab)41

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event (AE) - Overall Study

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of study drug, was also an AE. The number of participants who discontinued study drug due to an AE is presented. (NCT01704287)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 75 months (Through End of Trial Analysis database cutoff date of 31-Jan-2019)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg29
Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg33
ICC Only13
ICC→Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg1
ICC→Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg1
ICC→Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg (After Switch to Pembrolizumab)4
ICC→Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg (After Switch to Pembrolizumab)4

[back to top]

Best Overall Response (BOR) - Initial Treatment Period

BOR was assessed by independent radiology review using RECIST 1.1 and was recorded from randomization until the last imaging assessment in this period. Response categories included: Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD): at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions; and Stable Disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. BOR for the Initial Treatment Period was based on IRO. BOR for participants during the Initial Treatment Period is presented. (NCT01704287)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 36 months (Through Final Analysis database cutoff date of 16-Nov-2015)

,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseNot EvaluableNo DiseaseNo Assessment
Investigator-Choice Chemotherapy (ICC)0.04.519.061.515.10.00.0
Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg7.220.414.947.59.90.00.0
Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg3.318.916.746.713.30.60.6

[back to top]

Interim Overall Survival (OS) - Initial Treatment Period

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Analysis of OS was not planned or conducted for the switch-to-pembrolizumab treatment groups. Median OS based on the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data is presented. This was the interim analysis for OS. (NCT01704287)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 36 months (Through Final Analysis database cutoff date of 16-Nov-2015)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg13.4
Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg14.7
Investigator-Choice Chemotherapy (ICC)11.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Values

(NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (approximately 1 year)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
A+AVD662
ABVD658

[back to top]

Modified Progression-free Survival (mPFS) Per Independent Review Facility (IRF)

mPFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first of documentation of progressive disease (PD), death due to any cause, or for participants who were confirmed non complete responders per IRF, receipt of subsequent anticancer therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after completion of frontline therapy. PD was defined as any new lesion or increase by greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) of previously involved sites from nadir. Frontline therapy is the part of standard set of treatments. (NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Baseline until PD or death or receipt of any subsequent anticancer therapy for HL after completion of frontline therapy (approximately up to 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A+AVDNA
ABVDNA

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) Per IRF

EFS was defined as the time from randomization until any cause of treatment failure: PD, premature discontinuation of randomized treatment for any reason, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as any new lesion or increase by >=50% of previously involved sites from nadir per IRF. (NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Baseline until PD or discontinuation of treatment or death, whichever occurs first (approximately up to 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A+AVDNA
ABVDNA

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) Per IRF

DOR per IRF in participants with response was the time between first documentation of response (PR or CR) and PD as determined by an IRF. PD was defined as any new lesion or increase by >=50% of previously involved sites from nadir. CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease. PR was defined as regression of measurable disease and no new sites. (NCT01712490)
Timeframe: From first documented response until PD (approximately 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A+AVDNA
ABVDNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

(NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (approximately 1 year)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
TEAESAE
A+AVD653284
ABVD646178

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores by mPFS Based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at EOT

EORTC QLQ-C30 included 30 items across 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 9 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and global health status/QOL scale. It has 28 questions (4-point scale where 1=not at all [best] to 4=Very Much [worst]) and 2 questions (7-point scale where 1=very poor [worst] to 7= excellent [best]). Raw scores were converted into scale scores from 0 to 100. For functional scales and global health status/QOL scale, higher scores show better QOL; for symptom scales, lower scores show better QOL. mPFS was time from date of randomization to date of first of documentation of PD, death due to any cause, or for participants who were confirmed non complete responders per IRF, receipt of subsequent anticancer therapy for HL after completion of frontline therapy. PD is any new lesion or increase by >=50% of previously involved sites from nadir. (NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of treatment (approximately 1 year)

,
Interventionunits on scale (Mean)
Baseline: With mPFS eventWithout mPFS eventChange at end of treatment: with mPFS eventChange at end of treatment: without mPFS event
A+AVD78.1579.852.683.35
ABVD76.6879.918.586.08

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) Per IRF

DFS per IRF was defined as the time from CR to disease progression as determined by an IRF or to death from lymphoma or acute toxicity from treatment. CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease. (NCT01712490)
Timeframe: From CR until PD or death (approximately up to 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A+AVDNA
ABVDNA

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate at the End of Randomized Regimen Per IRF

CR rate at the end of randomized regimen per investigator was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR at the end of treatment with randomized regimen (ABVD or A+AVD) as determined by IRF. CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease. (NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of randomized regimen (approximately 1 year)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A+AVD73
ABVD70

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Per IRF Rate at the End of Frontline Therapy

CR rate at the end of frontline therapy per IRF was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR at the end of frontline therapy that is after completion of either randomized regimen or alternate frontline therapy as determined by an IRF. CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease. (NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of frontline therapy (approximately 4 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A+AVD73
ABVD71

[back to top]

A+AVD: AUCinf: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity for Brentuximab Vedotin MMAE

(NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to 48 hours) post-dose

Interventionday*nanogram per milliliter (day*ng/mL) (Mean)
A+AVD25.3

[back to top]

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Negativity Rate Per IRF at Cycle 2

PET negativity rate at Cycle 2 was defined as the percentage of participants with negative Cycle 2 PET results defined as Deauville score less than or equal to (<=) 3 at Cycle 2. The Deauville score according to IRF assessment of response was used to evaluate the results of PET scans. (NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 25

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A+AVD89
ABVD86

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Remission (DOCR) Per IRF

DOCR per IRF in participants with CR was the time between first documentation of CR and PD as determined by an IRF. PD was defined as any new lesion or increase by >=50% of previously involved sites from nadir. CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease. (NCT01712490)
Timeframe: From first documentation of CR until PD (approximately 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A+AVDNA
ABVDNA

[back to top]

A+AVD: AUCinf: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity for Brentuximab Vedotin ADC and TAb

(NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to 48 hours) post-dose

Interventionday*microgram per milliliter (day*ug/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1: ADCCycle 1 Day 1: TAb
A+AVD47.493.0

[back to top]

A+AVD: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Brentuximab Vedotin Monomethyl Auristatin E (MMAE)

(NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to 48 hours) post-dose

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 1
A+AVD3.201.36

[back to top]

A+AVD: Number of Participants With Antitherapeutic Antibody (ATA) and Neutralizing Antitherapeutic Antibody (nATA) Positive for Brentuximab Vedotin

The nATA positive was defined as positive ATA with neutralizing activity at any postbaseline visit. (NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of treatment (approximately 1 year)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ATA positivenATA positive
A+AVD10912

[back to top]

A+AVD: Cmax: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration for Brentuximab Vedotin Antibody-drug Conjugate (ADC) and Total Antibody (TAb)

(NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-dose and at multiple timepoints (up to 48 hours) post-dose

Interventionmicrogram per milliliter (microgm/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1: ADCCycle 3 Day 1: ADCCycle 1 Day 1: TAbCycle 3 Day 1: TAb
A+AVD22.923.622.626.4

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per IRF

ORR per IRF was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR or partial remission (PR) at the end of treatment with randomized regimen (ABVD or A+AVD) as determined by an IRF. CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease. PR was defined as regression of measurable disease and no new sites. (NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of randomized regimen (approximately 1 year)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A+AVD86
ABVD83

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants without documented death at the time of analysis were censored at the date last known to be alive. (NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Baseline until death (approximately up to 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A+AVDNA
ABVDNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Not in CR Per IRF Who Received Subsequent Radiation After Completion of Frontline Therapy

CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease as determined by an IRF. (NCT01712490)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of frontline therapy (approximately 4 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A+AVD8
ABVD13

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1 Negative

Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1 expression was defined the time between the date of randomization to the date of death. For participants without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive. (NCT01721746)
Timeframe: Up to 96 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Nivolumab11.14
Investigator's Choice (Dacarbazine or Carboplatin+Paclitaxel)11.76

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1 Positive

Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1 expression was defined the time between the date of randomization to the date of death. For participants without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive. (NCT01721746)
Timeframe: Up to 96 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Nivolumab31.44
Investigator's Choice (Dacarbazine or Carboplatin+Paclitaxel)16.72

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented progression, as determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) using RECIST 1.1, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Participants who died without a reported progression were considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not progress or die were censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment before subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Unit of measure (months) is the median survival time. (NCT01721746)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression or death (Up to approximately 38 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Nivolumab3.12
Investigator's Choice (Dacarbazine or Carboplatin+Paclitaxel)3.65

[back to top] [back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Baseline PD-L1 Expression

Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the number of participants with a Best Overall Response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by number of randomized participants. PD-L1 expression evaluated for ORR. (NCT01721746)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the date of objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent therapy (Up to approximately 38 months)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
<5% PD-L1 expression>=5% PD-L1 expression
Investigator's Choice (Dacarbazine or Carboplatin+Paclitaxel)13.812.2
Nivolumab15.343.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival (OS) was defined the time between the date of randomization to the date of death. For participants without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive. Unit of measure (months) is the median survival time. (NCT01721746)
Timeframe: Up to 96 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Nivolumab15.74
Investigator's Choice (Dacarbazine or Carboplatin+Paclitaxel)14.39

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Objective response rate (ORR) per Independent Review Committee (IRC) is defined as the number of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by the number of randomized participants using RECIST 1.1 (NCT01721746)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the date of objectively documented progression, date of death, or the date of subsequent therapy (Up to approximately 38 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Nivolumab27.2
Investigator's Choice (Dacarbazine or Carboplatin+Paclitaxel)9.8

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate

The PFS rate at a time point is the estimated percentage of patients who have not progressed and are alive at that time point following randomization and is estimated using the Kaplan-Meier methodology. (NCT01721772)
Timeframe: From randomization to the specified timepoints, up to 84 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
At 6 monthsAt 12 monthsAt 18 monthsAt 24 monthsAt 36 monthsAt 48 monthsAt 60 monthsAt 72 monthsAt 84 months
Dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m^2 + Placebo-matching Nivolumab20.07.45.25.23.93.93.93.93.9
Nivolumab, 3 mg/kg + Placebo-matching Dacarbazine48.243.340.535.832.829.728.427.825.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Extended

OS is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death. For those without documentation of death, OS will be censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive. OS data for this endpoint was collected after the primary completion date up until study completion. (NCT01721772)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to date of death. For those without documentation of death, to the last date the participant was known to be alive, assessed up to 94 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Nivolumab, 3 mg/kg + Placebo-matching Dacarbazine37.29
Dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m^2 + Placebo-matching Nivolumab11.17

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death or the last date the participant was known to be alive. (NCT01721772)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to date of death. For those without documentation of death, to the last date the participant was known to be alive, assessed up to 17 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Nivolumab, 3 mg/kg + Placebo-matching DacarbazineNA
Dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m^2 + Placebo-matching Nivolumab10.84

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) defined complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). RECIST, volume 1.1 for target lesions: CR=disappearance of all target lesions; PR=at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimension (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; stable disease=neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started; PD=at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, and the sum LD must have an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. (NCT01721772)
Timeframe: Tumor assessments beginning at 9 weeks following randomization and continuing every 6 weeks for the first year, then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death, assessed to 94 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Nivolumab, 3 mg/kg + Placebo-matching Dacarbazine42.4
Dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m^2 + Placebo-matching Nivolumab14.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival by Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Level

Overall Survival is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death or the last date the participant was known to be alive. PD-L1 expression level is defined as the percent of tumor cells demonstrating plasma membrane PD-L1-staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per a Dako PD-L1 IHC (immunohistochemistry) assay (referred to as quantifiable PD-L1 expression). Assessment of OS by PD-L1 expression as measured by a validated assay and comparing OS in patients with tumor PD-L1 expression ≥5% (PD-L1 positive) versus patients with tumor PD-L1 expression <5% (PD-L1 negative). Tumor tissue samples for PD-L1 testing were collected at screening from metastatic or unresectable sites prior to randomization. (NCT01721772)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to date of disease progression or death, up to approximately 94 months

,
InterventionMonths (Median)
PD-L1 positive participants (cutoff=5%)PD-L1 negative/indeterminate participants (cutoff=5%)
Dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m^2 + Placebo-matching Nivolumab12.3910.84
Nivolumab, 3 mg/kg + Placebo-matching Dacarbazine53.3626.97

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Rate Extended

OS rate is calculated as the percentage of participants alive at the indicated timepoints. Data for this endpoint was collected after the primary completion date up until study completion. The OS rate for the 6 month and 12 month timepoints reflect updated data that was collected after the primary completion date. (NCT01721772)
Timeframe: From randomization to the specified timepoints, up to 84 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
6 months12 months18 months24 months36 months48 months60 months72 months84 months
Dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m^2 + Placebo-matching Nivolumab20.07.436.726.321.617.917.416.916.9
Nivolumab, 3 mg/kg + Placebo-matching Dacarbazine48.243.363.857.850.843.839.337.336.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Rate

OS rate is calculated as the percentage of participants alive at the indicated timepoints (NCT01721772)
Timeframe: From randomization to 6 months and or to 12 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
At 6 monthsAt 12 months
Dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m^2 + Placebo-matching Nivolumab71.842.1
Nivolumab, 3 mg/kg + Placebo-matching Dacarbazine84.172.9

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Investigator-assessed PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented progression, as determined by the investigator, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Patients who died without progressing were considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Those who did not progress or die were documented on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Patients who did not have any on-study tumor assessments and did not die were documented on their date of randomization. Those who started any subsequent anticancer therapy without a prior reported progression were documented on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment prior to initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy. (NCT01721772)
Timeframe: From date of randomization up to date of disease progression or death, up to approximately 84 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Nivolumab, 3 mg/kg + Placebo-matching Dacarbazine5.06
Dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m^2 + Placebo-matching Nivolumab2.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

EQ-5D-5L, is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. EQ-5D-5L contained 1 item for each of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Index score: participant responses to the 5 dimensions reflected a specific health state that corresponded to a population preference weight for that state on a continuous scale of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Higher index scores = better health state. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4 Day 1Week 7 Day 1Week 13 Day 1Week 19 Day 1Week 25 Day 1Week 34 Day 1Week 43 Day 1Week 52 Day 1Week 61 Day 1Week 70 Day 1End of Treatment30-day safety follow-upPost treatment follow-up 1Post treatment follow-up 2Post treatment follow-up 3Post treatment follow-up 4Post treatment follow-up 5Post treatment follow-up 6
Binimetinib (MEK162)0.7780-0.0422-0.0397-0.0773-0.0576-0.1563-0.0801-0.0170-0.03890.06900.0120-0.0978-0.1165-0.0820-0.2480-0.12100.11150.17300.2230

[back to top]

Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in Global Health Status Score of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30)

The time to definitive 10% deterioration was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event, which was defined as death due to any cause or at least 10% worsening of the corresponding scale score, relative to baseline, with no later improvement above this threshold observed during the course of the study or death due to any cause. If a participant had no event prior to analysis cut-off or start of another anticancer therapy, time to deterioration was censored at the date of the last adequate health related quality of life (HRQoL) evaluation. EORTC QLQ-C30: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, pain, fatigue) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single-item measures range =0 to 100. High score for global health status = high quality of life. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

InterventionMonths (Median)
Binimetinib (MEK162)2.79
Dacarbazine4.27

[back to top]

Time to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)

ECOG PS was used to assess the physical health of participants, and ranged from 0 (most active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS grades: 0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work, 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours, 4=completely disabled. cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair and 5= dead. Definitive deterioration is defined as on treatment death due to any cause or decrease in ECOG PS by at least one category from baseline score. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 73 weeks 3 days for binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 57 weeks 3 days for dacarbazine arm

InterventionMonths (Median)
Binimetinib (MEK162)NA
DacarbazineNA

[back to top]

Time to Response (TTR)

TTR: time between date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: >=30% decrease in sum of diameter (dia) of all TLs, referring baseline sum of dia; c) PD: >=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured TLs taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all TLs recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of >=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Appearance of >=1 new lesion. Participants who did not achieve PR or CR censored at last adequate tumor assessment date when they did not have PFS event (time from date of randomization to date of first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occur first) or at maximum follow-up when they had PFS event. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Binimetinib (MEK162)1.45
Dacarbazine2.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

EQ-5D-5L, is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. EQ-5D-5L contained 1 item for each of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Index score: participant responses to the 5 dimensions reflected a specific health state that corresponded to a population preference weight for that state on a continuous scale of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Higher index scores = better health state. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4 Day 1Week 7 Day 1Week 13 Day 1Week 19 Day 1Week 25 Day 1Week 34 Day 1Week 43 Day 1Week 52 Day 1End of Treatment30-day safety follow-upPost treatment follow-up 1
Dacarbazine0.76570.01100.01320.01980.02570.06570.06170.10600.0000-0.0540-0.0740-0.0438

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)

ECOG PS was used to assess the physical health of participants, and ranged from 0 (most active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS grades: 0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work, 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, 4=completely disabled. cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours and 5= dead. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: For both arms: Baseline, Weeks 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, 40, 43, 46, 49, 52, 55 and 30-day Follow-up For binimetinib only: Weeks 58, 61, 64, 67, 70, 73

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline : Grade 0Baseline: Grade 1Baseline : Grade 2Week 4 Day 1: Grade 0Week 4 Day 1: Grade 1Week 4 Day 1: Grade 2Week 4 Day 1: Grade 3Week 7 Day 1: Grade 0Week 7 Day 1: Grade 1Week 7 Day 1: Grade 2Week 7 Day 1: Grade 3Week 7 Day 1: Grade 4Week 10 Day 1: Grade 0Week 10 Day 1: Grade 1Week 10 Day 1: Grade 2Week 10 Day 1: Grade 3Week 13 Day 1: Grade 0Week 13 Day 1: Grade 1Week 13 Day 1: Grade 2Week 13 Day 1: Grade 3Week 16 Day 1: Grade 0Week 16 Day 1: Grade 1Week 16 Day 1: Grade 2Week 16 Day 1: Grade 4Week 19 Day 1: Grade 0Week 19 Day 1: Grade 1Week 19 Day 1:Grade 2Week 22 Day 1: Grade 0Week 22 Day 1: Grade 1Week 22 Day 1: Grade 2Week 22 Day 1: Grade 3Week 25 Day 1: Grade 0Week 25 Day 1: Grade 1Week 25 Day 1: Grade 2Week 25 Day 1: Grade 3Week 28 Day 1: Grade 0Week 28 Day 1: Grade 1Week 28 Day 1: Grade 2Week 28 Day 1: Grade 5Week 31 Day 1: Grade 0Week 31 Day 1: Grade 1Week 31 Day 1: Grade 2Week 34 Day 1: Grade 0Week 34 Day 1: Grade 1Week 34 Day 1: Grade 2Week 37 Day 1: Grade 0Week 37 Day 1: Grade 1Week 40 Day 1: Grade 0Week 40 Day 1: Grade 1Week 43 Day 1: Grade 0Week 43 Day 1: Grade 1Week 43 Day 1: Grade 2Week 46 Day 1: Grade 0Week 46 Day 1: Grade 1Week 46 Day 1: Grade 2Week 49 Day 1: Grade 0Week 49 Day 1: Grade 1Week 52 Day 1: Grade 0Week 52 Day 1: Grade 1Week 55 Day 1: Grade 0Week 55 Day 1: Grade 1Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 0Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 1Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 2Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 3Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 4
Dacarbazine8231166274051263003415202914002451019721750013600920072091071615004001021112416400

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

EORTC QLQ-C30: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a h global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, pain, fatigue) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single-item measures range =0 to 100. High score for global health status = high quality of life. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4 Day 1Week 7 Day 1Week 13 Day 1Week 19 Day 1Week 25 Day 1Week 34 Day 1Week 43 Day 1Week 52 Day 1End of Treatment30-day safety follow-upPost treatment follow-up 1
Dacarbazine70.50-1.810.00-1.34-3.26-3.473.57-6.94-8.33-6.74-9.62-8.59

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

EORTC QLQ-C30: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a h global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, pain, fatigue) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single-item measures range =0 to 100. High score for global health status = high quality of life. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4 Day 1Week 7 Day 1Week 13 Day 1Week 19 Day 1Week 25 Day 1Week 34 Day 1Week 43 Day 1Week 52 Day 1Week 61 Day 1Week 70 Day 1End of Treatment30-day safety follow-upPost treatment follow-up 1Post treatment follow-up 2Post treatment follow-up 3Post treatment follow-up 4Post treatment follow-up 5Post treatment follow-up 6
Binimetinib (MEK162)68.35-5.75-8.63-8.28-8.05-10.58-6.25-11.36-1.52-10.00-20.83-12.20-8.10-5.950.0016.6725.0025.0033.33

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR was calculated as the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR, PR, SD RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: >=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; c) SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum diameters; d) PD: >=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of >=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first documented response of CR, PR, SD or non-CR/non-PD (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Binimetinib (MEK162)58.4
Dacarbazine24.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03

Clinically notable shifts are defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to >= grade 3. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Albumin decreasedAlkaline phosphataseAlanine aminotransferaseAspartate aminotransferaseBilirubinCorrected Calcium increasedCorrected Calcium decreasedCreatinineGamma-glutamyl transferaseGlucose serum fasting increasedGlucose serum fasting decreasedPotassium increasedPotassium decreasedMagnesium increasedMagnesium decreasedPhosphate decreasedSodium increasedSodium decreased
Binimetinib (MEK162)27814201229913613141117234
Dacarbazine524114027503100540

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03

Clinically notable shifts are defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to >= grade 3. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Activated partial thromboplastin time prolongedHemoglobin decreasedProthrombin international normalized ratio increasedLymphocytes increasedLymphocytes decreasedNeutrophils decreasedPlatelets decreasedLeukocytes increasedLeukocytes decreased
Binimetinib (MEK162)717920358306
Dacarbazine21300192117026

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs

Abnormalities criteria included: low/high pulse rate (beats per minute [bpm]):<=50bpm with decrease from baseline >=15bpm/>=120bpm with increase from baseline >=15bpm; Low/high systolic blood pressure (millimeters of mercury [mmHg]): <=90mmHg with decrease from baseline >=20mmHg/>=160mmHg with increase from baseline >=20mmHg; Low/high diastolic blood pressure [mmHg]: <=50mmHg with decrease from baseline >=15mmHg/>=100mmHg with increase from baseline >=15mmHg; Low/high body weight (kilogram [kg]): >=20% decrease from baseline / >=10% increase from baseline; Low/high body temperature (degree Celsius [°C]): <=36°C / >= 37.5°C (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sitting Pulse Rate - HighSitting Pulse Rate - LowSitting systolic blood pressure - HighSitting systolic blood pressure -LowSitting diastolic blood pressure - HighSitting diastolic blood pressure - LowWeight - HighWeight - LowBody temperature - HighBody temperature - Low
Binimetinib (MEK162)434322821601590
Dacarbazine11844110624

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. SAE was defined as one of the following: was fatal or life-threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; constituted a congenital anomaly/birth defect; was medically significant; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. Treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE with onset date occurring during the on-treatment period. AEs included all SAEs and non-SAEs. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 219.4 weeks for binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 123.9 weeks for dacarbazine arm

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEsSAEs
Binimetinib (MEK162)26995
Dacarbazine10426

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR: percentage of participants with best overall response (BOR) of CR or PR. BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until CR or PR. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: >=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, taking as reference baseline sum of diameters. ORR is reported for confirmed and unconfirmed responses. Confirmed CR or PR = at least 2 determinations of CR or PR at least 4 weeks apart before PD. PD: >=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all TLs recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of >=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Confirmed ORRConfirmed + Unconfirmed: ORR
Binimetinib (MEK162)15.222.7
Dacarbazine6.89.8

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib

(NCT01763164)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Week 1: Pre-dose, 1, 1.5, 2, 10 hours post-dose; Day 1 of Weeks 4, 7: Pre-dose, 1.5 hours post-dose; Day 1 of Weeks 10, 13: Pre-dose

InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Week 1 Day 1, Pre-doseWeek 1 Day 1, 1 hour (hr) Post-doseWeek 1 Day 1, 1.5 hr Post-doseWeek 1 Day 1, 2 hr Post-doseWeek 1 Day 1, 10 hr Post-doseWeek 4 Day 1, Pre-doseWeek 4 Day 1, 1.5 hr Post-doseWeek 7 Day 1, Pre-doseWeek 7 Day 1, 1.5 hr Post-doseWeek 10 Day 1, Pre-doseWeek 13 Day 1, Pre-dose
Binimetinib (MEK162)64.418231332115310141810137292.993.9

[back to top]

Duration of Objective Response (DOR)

DOR: time from date of first documented response (CR or PR) to first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: >=30% decrease in sum of diameter (dia) of all TLs, referring baseline sum of dia; c) PD: >=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of >=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion. If a participant with a CR or PR had no PD or death due to underlying cancer, participants was censored at date of last adequate tumor assessment. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: From the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the first documented progression or death (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Binimetinib (MEK162)6.87
DacarbazineNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)

ECOG PS was used to assess the physical health of participants, and ranged from 0 (most active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS grades: 0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work, 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, 4=completely disabled. cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours and 5= dead. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: For both arms: Baseline, Weeks 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, 40, 43, 46, 49, 52, 55 and 30-day Follow-up For binimetinib only: Weeks 58, 61, 64, 67, 70, 73

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline : Grade 0Baseline: Grade 1Baseline : Grade 2Week 4 Day 1: Grade 0Week 4 Day 1: Grade 1Week 4 Day 1: Grade 2Week 4 Day 1: Grade 3Week 7 Day 1: Grade 0Week 7 Day 1: Grade 1Week 7 Day 1: Grade 2Week 7 Day 1: Grade 3Week 7 Day 1: Grade 4Week 10 Day 1: Grade 0Week 10 Day 1: Grade 1Week 10 Day 1: Grade 2Week 10 Day 1: Grade 3Week 13 Day 1: Grade 0Week 13 Day 1: Grade 1Week 13 Day 1: Grade 2Week 13 Day 1: Grade 3Week 16 Day 1: Grade 0Week 16 Day 1: Grade 1Week 16 Day 1: Grade 2Week 16 Day 1: Grade 4Week 19 Day 1: Grade 0Week 19 Day 1: Grade 1Week 19 Day 1:Grade 2Week 22 Day 1: Grade 0Week 22 Day 1: Grade 1Week 22 Day 1: Grade 2Week 22 Day 1: Grade 3Week 25 Day 1: Grade 0Week 25 Day 1: Grade 1Week 25 Day 1: Grade 2Week 25 Day 1: Grade 3Week 28 Day 1: Grade 0Week 28 Day 1: Grade 1Week 28 Day 1: Grade 2Week 28 Day 1: Grade 5Week 31 Day 1: Grade 0Week 31 Day 1: Grade 1Week 31 Day 1: Grade 2Week 34 Day 1: Grade 0Week 34 Day 1: Grade 1Week 34 Day 1: Grade 2Week 37 Day 1: Grade 0Week 37 Day 1: Grade 1Week 40 Day 1: Grade 0Week 40 Day 1: Grade 1Week 43 Day 1: Grade 0Week 43 Day 1: Grade 1Week 43 Day 1: Grade 2Week 46 Day 1: Grade 0Week 46 Day 1: Grade 1Week 46 Day 1: Grade 2Week 49 Day 1: Grade 0Week 49 Day 1: Grade 1Week 52 Day 1: Grade 0Week 52 Day 1: Grade 1Week 55 Day 1: Grade 0Week 55 Day 1: Grade 1Week 58 Day 1: Grade 0Week 58 Day 1: Grade 1Week 61 Day 1: Grade 0Week 64 Day 1: Grade 0Week 67 Day 1: Grade 0Week 70 Day 1: Grade 0Week 73 Day 1: Grade 0Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 0Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 1Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 2Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 3Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 4
Binimetinib (MEK162)193760146101631388410311187283936211170485153434422631371911281521221112072164150121111219210191715432142411444

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline

Number of participants with NRAS mutation status at baseline were reported. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Wild TypeMutant: Q61KMutant: Q61LMutant: Q61R
Binimetinib (MEK162)010032137
Dacarbazine1511764

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

Criteria for notable ECG values were as follow: QT interval (in millisecond [msec]) new (newly occurring post-baseline value) greater than (>) 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline >30, increase from baseline >60; corrected QT interval by Fredericia formula (QTcF) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) > 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline >30, increase from baseline >60; corrected QT interval by Bazett's formula (QTcB) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) > 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline >30, increase from baseline >60; heart rate in bpm new (newly occurring post-baseline value) <60 and >100. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
QT - New > 450 msecQT - New > 480 msecQT - New > 500 msecQT - Increase from baseline > 30 msecQT - Increase from baseline > 60 msecQTcF - New > 450 msecQTcF - New > 480 msecQTcF - New > 500 msecQTcF - Increase from baseline > 30 msecQTcF - Increase from baseline > 60 msecQTcB - New > 450 msecQTcB - New > 480 msecQTcB - New > 500 msecQTcB - Increase from baseline > 30 msecQTcB - Increase from baseline > 60 msecHeart rate - New < 60 bpmHeart rate - New > 100 bpm
Binimetinib (MEK162)327510928291055296524676118518
Dacarbazine810335151125526863691316

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1

PFS: time from randomization to first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. RECIST 1.1, PD: >=20% increase in sum of diameter of target lesions (TLs) taking as reference the smallest sum on study (including baseline sum), sum must also be an absolute increase of >=5 mm; unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs; appearance of >=1 lesion. Complete response (CR): disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs. Partial response (PR): >=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, referring baseline sum of diameters. Stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor increase in lesions qualified for PD referring smallest sum diameter. With no event at time of analysis cut-off or at start of any new anti-neoplastic therapy, PFS censored at date of last adequate tumor assessment of CR, PR or SD. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Binimetinib (MEK162)2.83
Dacarbazine1.51

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, overall survival was censored at the date of last known date participant alive. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the date of death (maximum up to 107 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 88 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Binimetinib (MEK162)10.97
Dacarbazine10.09

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Ocular Events

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. Grade 1: Asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately sight threatening; Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: Sight-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; blindness (20/200 or worse) in the affected eye. Here, in this outcome measure data is reported for events falling in any of the grades. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Binimetinib (MEK162)6
Dacarbazine0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Cardiac Events

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. Here, in this outcome measure data is reported for events falling in any of the grades. (NCT01763164)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Binimetinib (MEK162)35
Dacarbazine2

[back to top]

Partial Response Rate

Number of participants who achieved a partial response per RECIST v1.0 criteria (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg1
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg4

[back to top]

Maximal Tolerated Dose of Brentuximab Vedotin (Phase I)

Defined as the dose level at which =< 1 of 6 subjects experience dose limiting toxicity. (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionmg/kg (Number)
Treatment (Brentuximab and Combination Chemotherapy)1.2

[back to top]

Incidence of Neurotoxicity

Number of participants who experience neurotoxicity at cycle 5 (visit 4) (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 5 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg4
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg23

[back to top]

Frequency of Adverse Events

Number of Participants who had one or more adverse events (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg6
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg35

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Proportion of participants who are alive and progression-free at 2 years (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg1.0
Phase II Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg0.84

[back to top]

Characterization of Histologic Subtypes in HIV-HL in the HAART Era

Participants with mixed cellularity histologic subtype (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg2
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg13

[back to top]

CD8 Counts

Absolute CD8 counts at cycle 5 (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 5 months

Interventioncells/µL (Median)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg719.5
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg666.5

[back to top]

CD4 Counts

CD4 counts (absolute) at visit 4 (cycle 5) (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 5 months

Interventioncells/µL (Median)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg378
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg401

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

Number of participants who experienced a complete response per RECIST v1.0 criteria (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg6
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg32

[back to top]

Viral Load

HIV viral load (detectable) (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 5 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg1
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg7

[back to top]

2-year Overall Survival

Proportion of study participants who are alive at 2 years estimated using the Kaplan-Meier survival function (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg1.0
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg0.91

[back to top]

2-year Progression-free Survival (PFS)

2-year PFS is determined based on the Kaplan-Meier estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals based on standard errors using Greenwood's formula. (NCT01771107)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Phase I - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg1.0
Phase II - Brentuximab 1.2 mg/kg0.84

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Grade 3+ Adverse Events Regardless of Attribution

percentage of patients who experienced grade 3+ adverse events regardless of attribution, graded according to the National Cancer Institute CTCAE version 4.0 (NCT01835145)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm I (Cabozantinib-s-malate)51.6
Arm II (Temozolomide or Dacarbazine)20

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Without a Progression Free Survival Event at 4 Months (PFS4)

A patient will be declared a PFS4 success if they are on study and progression free for at least 4 months. Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression. The success for each arm will be calculated independently as the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. A one-sided chi-squared test for a difference in PFS4 proportions will be used to test for a difference between arms. (NCT01835145)
Timeframe: At 4 months

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm I (Cabozantinib-s-malate).323
Arm II (Temozolomide or Dacarbazine).267

[back to top]

Confirmed Response Rate as Determined by the RECIST Criteria (Version 1.1)

The confirmed response rates will be estimated by dividing the number of confirmed responders by the number of evaluable patients. 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT01835145)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Cabozantinib-s-malate)0
Arm II (Temozolomide or Dacarbazine)0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

The distribution of OS time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan Meier. (NCT01835145)
Timeframe: Number of days from registration until death, assessed up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Cabozantinib-s-malate)6.3
Arm II (Temozolomide or Dacarbazine)7.2

[back to top]

PFS

The distribution of PFS time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan Meier and is defined as the number of days from registration until disease progression (or death). Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression. (NCT01835145)
Timeframe: Number of days from registration until disease progression (or death), assessed up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Cabozantinib-s-malate)2.0
Arm II (Temozolomide or Dacarbazine)1.9

[back to top]

Descriptive of Neuropathic Adverse Events

To describe acute hematologic, neuropathic, and infectious toxicities as they relate to transfusion requirements, growth factor support, episodes of febrile neutropenia and hospitalizations, according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: From enrollment to end of therapy (approximately 8 months)

,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Peripheral sensory neuropathyPain in extremityNeuralgiaPain NOS
Cycle 1 - Grade 20311
Cycle 1 - Grade 3-40100
Cycle 2 - Grade 21401
Cycle 2 - Grade 3-40000
Cycle 3 - Grade 22100
Cycle 3 - Grade 3-40000
Cycle 4 - Grade 23100
Cycle 4 - Grade 3-40000
Cycle 5 - Grade 21210
Cycle 5 - Grade 3-40000
Cycle 6 - Grade 21001
Cycle 6 - Grade 3-40001

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Initially Enrolled Patients That Have a Complete Response at Early Response Assessment Compared to Historical Control

To determine the efficacy of 2 cycles of AEPA chemotherapy, the response rate for the first 32 evaluable participants enrolled was evaluated. If it shown efficacy (detect 20% increase complete rate with 80% power and 5% type I error compared with the proportion of historical control of HOD99 unfavorable risk patients had complete rate at week 8 of 17% (24/141), the response results will be reported in a national/international meeting and the study will continue to enroll for a total of 77 patients. (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: After the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (at approximately 2 months after enrollment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AEPA Chemotherapy31.25

[back to top]

Comparison of the Event-free (EFS) Survival in High Risk HL Patients Treated With AEPA/CAPDac to the Historical Control HOD99 Unfavorable Risk 2 Arm (UR2).

Event-free survival (EFS) is defined as the probability of survival between the date of study enrollment to the date of first event (relapsed or progressive disease, second malignancy, or death from any cause) or to last follow-up for patients without events. Under the proportional hazard model assumption, the two-sample log-rank test used to compare the EFS between HLHR13 and historical control of HOD99 unfavorable risk 2 arm (UR2). (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: From start of therapy to 2 years after completion of therapy (up to 3 years after study enrollment)

Interventionprobability (Number)
AEPA/CAPDac0.974

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate Estimate for All Evaluable Participants

To evaluate the safety of AEPA/CAPDac, as well as the efficacy (early complete response) after 2 cycles of AEPA chemotherapy in high-risk patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL). (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: After the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (at 2 months from enrollment for each participant)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AEPA/CAPDac35

[back to top]

Local Failure Rate in High Risk HL Patients Treated With AEPA/CAPDac.

The local failure rate within the high-risk HL participants treated with AEPA/CAPDac will be estimated with a 95% confidence interval using appropriate methods (e.g., estimate cumulative incidence in the presence of competing risks). (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: From start of therapy to 2 years after completion of therapy (up to 3 years after study enrollment)

InterventionProbability (Number)
AEPA/CAPDac0.013

[back to top]

Percentage of Initially Enrolled Patients That Have a Complete Response at Early Response Assessment Compared to Historical Control

To determine the efficacy of 2 cycles of AEPA chemotherapy, the response rate for the first 32 evaluable participants enrolled was evaluated. If it shown efficacy (detect 20% increase complete rate with 80% power and 5% type I error compared with the proportion of historical control of HOD99 (NCT00145600) unfavorable risk patients had complete rate at week 8 of 17% (24/141), the response results will be reported in a national/international meeting and the study will continue to enroll for a total of 77 patients. (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: After the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (at approximately 2 months after enrollment)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AEPA Chemotherapy31.25

[back to top]

Descriptive of Hematological Adverse Events

To describe acute hematologic, neuropathic, and infectious toxicities as they relate to transfusion requirements, growth factor support, episodes of febrile neutropenia and hospitalizations, according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: From enrollment to end of therapy (approximately 8 months)

,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
LeukopeniaNeutropeniaLymphopeniaAnemiaThrombocytopenia
Cycle 1 - Grade 215515233
Cycle 1 - Grade 3-4496236123
Cycle 2 - Grade 2281318282
Cycle 2 - Grade 3-423511551
Cycle 3 - Grade 287960
Cycle 3 - Grade 3-4410712
Cycle 4 - Grade 2551660
Cycle 4 - Grade 3-4531501
Cycle 5 - Grade 2741340
Cycle 5 - Grade 3-4232211
Cycle 6 - Grade 21482021
Cycle 6 - Grade 3-4563112

[back to top]

Descriptive of Infectious Adverse Events

To describe acute hematologic, neuropathic, and infectious toxicities as they relate to transfusion requirements, growth factor support, episodes of febrile neutropenia and hospitalizations, according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. (NCT01920932)
Timeframe: From enrollment to end of therapy (approximately 8 months)

,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Febrile neutropeniaMucositisUpper respiratory infectionGenitourinary infection
Cycle 1 - Grade 201051
Cycle 1 - Grade 3-46220
Cycle 2 - Grade 20631
Cycle 2 - Grade 3-43400
Cycle 3 - Grade 20002
Cycle 3 - Grade 3-40000
Cycle 4 - Grade 20101
Cycle 4 - Grade 3-42020
Cycle 5 - Grade 20102
Cycle 5 - Grade 3-41000
Cycle 6 - Grade 20100
Cycle 6 - Grade 3-40000

[back to top]

Assessment of the Overall Survival (OS) in Patients Taking Selumetinib in Combination With Dacarbazine Compared With Those Taking Placebo in Combination With Dacarbazine

Overall Survival (NCT01974752)
Timeframe: From Randomization, up until death assessed up to 15th May 2015

InterventionNumber of Overall Survival Events (Number)
Selumetinib 75 mg BD + Dacarbazine 1000 mg/m234
Placebo + Dacarbazine 1000 mg/m214

[back to top]

Assessment of the Efficacy of Selumetinib in Combination With Dacarbazine Compared With Placebo in Combination With Dacarbazine in Terms of Objective Response Rate (ORR) by BICR

ORR at Week 6 using BICR according to RECIST 1.1 (NCT01974752)
Timeframe: From Randomization, then every 6 weeks up until progression or death (whichever is sooner) assessed up to 15th May 2015

Interventionnumber of responders (Number)
Selumetinib 75 mg BD + Dacarbazine 1000 mg/m23
Placebo + Dacarbazine 1000 mg/m20

[back to top]

Assessment of the Efficacy of Selumetinib in Combination With Dacarbazine Compared With Placebo in Combination With Dacarbazine Measured as Progression Free Survival (PFS) Using BICR According to RECIST 1.1.

Progression free survival (PFS) using blinded independent central review (BICR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01974752)
Timeframe: From Randomization, then every 6 weeks up until progression or death (whichever is sooner) assessed up to 15th May 2015

Interventionnumber of progression events (Number)
Selumetinib 75 mg BD + Dacarbazine 1000 mg/m282
Placebo + Dacarbazine 1000 mg/m224

[back to top]

Assessment of the Efficacy of Selumetinib in Combination With Dacarbazine Compared With Placebo in Combination With Dacarbazine in Terms of Change in Tumour Size at Week 6 by BICR

Percent change in tumour size at Week 6 using BICR according to RECIST 1.1 (NCT01974752)
Timeframe: From Randomization, then every 6 weeks up until progression or death (whichever is sooner) assessed up to 15th May 2015

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Selumetinib 75 mg BD + Dacarbazine 1000 mg/m26.94
Placebo + Dacarbazine 1000 mg/m219.76

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate Based on IRRC Assessments in Cohorts A, B, and C

"The CR rate was defined as the percent of participants with a BOR of CR (disappearance of all evidence of disease) according to the 2007 IWG criteria, based on IRRC assessment.~Confidence interval based on Clopper-Pearson method." (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose to the date of initial objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent therapy, or death whichever occurred first (up to approximately 100 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Cohort A: Post-Transplant, Never Taken Brentuximab Vedotin31.7
Cohort B: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant13.8
Cohort C: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Pre-and/or Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant21

[back to top]

Partial Remission (PR) Rate Based on IRRC Assessments in Cohorts A, B, and C

"The PR rate was defined as the percent of participants with a BOR of PR (regression of measurable disease and no new sites) according to the 2007 IWG criteria, based on IRRC assessment.~Confidence interval based on Clopper-Pearson method." (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose to the date of initial objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent therapy, or death whichever occurred first (up to approximately 100 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Cohort A: Post-Transplant, Never Taken Brentuximab Vedotin33.3
Cohort B: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant57.5
Cohort C: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Pre-and/or Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant54.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohort D

A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening (defined as an event in which the participant was at risk of death at the time of the event; it does not refer to an event which hypothetically might have caused death if it were more severe), requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose of the considered therapy phase to 30 days after last dose of study therapy phase (or up to first dose of combination if any when considering the monotherapy period) (an average of 8 months and a maximum of 11 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MonotherapyCombination Therapy (receiving AVD or NAVD)
Cohort D: Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Advanced Stage cHL (Stage IIB, III and IV)210

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Select AEs in Cohort D

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study drug and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (such as an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Select AEs have been categorized into seven areas: pulmonary toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, hepatotoxicity, endocrinopathy, skin toxicity, neurological toxicity and renal toxicity. Select AEs, in particular pneumonitis, are considered clinically meaningful as they require greater vigilance and for early recognition and prompt intervention. (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose of the considered therapy phase to 30 days after last dose of study therapy phase (or up to first dose of combination if any when considering the monotherapy period) (an average of 8 months and a maximum of 11 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Gastrointestinal MonotherapyGastrointestinal Combination TherapyHepatic MonotherapyHepatic Combination TherapyPulmonary MonotherapyPulmonary Combination TherapyRenal MonotherapyRenal Combination TherapySkin MonotherapySkin Combination TherapyHypersensitivity/Infusion Reactions MonotherapyHypersensitivity/Infusion Reactions Combination
Cohort D: Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Advanced Stage cHL (Stage IIB, III and IV)613230310179164

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Specific Thyroid Tests in Cohort D Monotherapy Phase

The number of participants with laboratory abnormalities in specific thyroid tests based on SI conventional units. TSH = Thyroid Stimulating Hormone LLN = Lower Limit of Normal ULN = Upper Limit of Normal (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose of monotherapy to 30 days after last dose of monotherapy phase (up to approximately 3 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TSH > ULNTSH > ULN WITH TSH <= ULN AT BASELINETSH >ULN WITH ATLEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST VALUE TSH >ULN WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST VALUES >= LLNTSH > ULN WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSINGTSH < LLNTSH = LLN AT BASELINETSH ULNTSH TSH < LLN WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING
Cohort D: Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Advanced Stage cHL (Stage IIB, III and IV)1100155104

[back to top]

Number of Participants Laboratory Abnormalities in Specific Thyroid Tests in Cohort D Combination Therapy Phase

The number of participants with laboratory abnormalities in specific thyroid tests based on SI conventional units. TSH = Thyroid Stimulating Hormone LLN = Lower Limit of Normal ULN = Upper Limit of Normal (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose of the combination therapy to 30 days after last dose of combination therapy (an average of 8 months and a maximum of 11 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TSH > ULNTSH > ULN WITH TSH <= ULN AT BASELINETSH >ULN WITH ATLEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST VALUE TSH >ULN WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST VALUES >= LLNTSH > ULN WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSINGTSH < LLNTSH = LLN AT BASELINETSH ULNTSH TSH < LLN WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING
Cohort D: Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Advanced Stage cHL (Stage IIB, III and IV)12831855104

[back to top]

Objective Response Rates (ORR) Based on Investigator Assessments for Cohorts A, B, and C

"ORR is the percent of participants achieving either a complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) according to the 2007 IWG criteria. Analyses of efficacy endpoints were performed separately for each cohort, according to IWG 2007. For cohort A and B, if the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma before treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. For cohort C, no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow was required in all participants in lieu of bone marrow aspirate/ biopsy.~CR is the percent of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of CR (disappearance of all evidence of disease) according to the 2007 IWG criteria, based on IRRC assessment.~PR is the percent of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of PR (regression of measurable disease and no new sites) according to the 2007 IWG criteria, based on IRRC assessment.~Confidence interval based on Clopper-Pearson method." (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose to the date of initial objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent therapy, or death whichever occurred first (up to approximately 100 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Cohort A: Post-Transplant, Never Taken Brentuximab Vedotin69.8
Cohort B: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant73.8
Cohort C: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Pre-and/or Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant70.0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRRC Assessments in Cohorts A, B, and C Extended Collection

Represents an updated version of the primary endpoint to include additional data collection that occurred after the primary completion date. (Assessments were made until 30 Nov 2022). Clinical benefit of nivolumab, as measured by ORR per IRRC assessment, and defined as percent of participants achieving either complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) according to the 2007 IWG criteria. For cohort A and B, if the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma before treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. For cohort C, no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow was required in all patients in lieu of bone marrow aspirate/ biopsy. CR is the percent of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of CR (disappearance of all evidence of disease) according to the 2007 IWG criteria. PR is the percent of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of PR (regression of measurable disease and no new sites) according to the 2007 IWG criteria. (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose to the date of initial objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent therapy, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 100 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Cohort A: Post-Transplant, Never Taken Brentuximab Vedotin65.1
Cohort B: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant71.3
Cohort C: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Pre-and/or Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant75.0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRRC Assessments in Cohorts A, B, and C

"ORR is the percent of participants achieving either a complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) according to the 2007 IWG criteria. Analyses of efficacy endpoints were performed separately for each cohort, according to IWG 2007. For cohort A and B, if the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma before treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. For cohort C, no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow was required in all participants in lieu of bone marrow aspirate/ biopsy.~CR is the percent of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of CR (disappearance of all evidence of disease) according to the 2007 IWG criteria, based on IRRC assessment.~PR is the percent of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of PR (regression of measurable disease and no new sites) according to the 2007 IWG criteria, based on IRRC assessment.~Confidence interval based on Clopper-Pearson method." (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose to the date of initial objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent therapy, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 28 months)

InterventionPercentage of Particpants (Number)
Cohort A: Post-Transplant, Never Taken Brentuximab Vedotin65.1
Cohort B: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant67.5
Cohort C: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Pre-and/or Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant73.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Specific Liver Tests in Cohort D Monotherapy Phase

The number of participants with laboratory abnormalities in specific liver tests based on SI conventional units. ALT = Alanine Aminotransferase, AST = Aspartate Aminotransferase, ULN = Upper Limit of Normal. (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose of monotherapy to 30 days after last dose of monotherapy phase (up to approximately 3 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ALT OR AST > 3XULNALT OR AST> 5XULNALT OR AST> 10XULNALT OR AST > 20XULNTOTAL BILIRUBIN > 2XULNALT/AST ELEV>3XULN;TOTAL BILIRUBIN>2XULN IN 1 DAYALT/AST ELEV>3XULN;TOTAL BILIRUBIN>2XULN IN 30 DAYS
Cohort D: Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Advanced Stage cHL (Stage IIB, III and IV)2100000

[back to top]

Duration of PR Based on IRRC Assessments in Cohorts A, B, and C

"The duration of PR was only evaluated in participants with BOR of PR and was defined as the time from first documentation of PR (regression of measurable disease and no new sites) to the date of initial objectively documented progression (any new lesion or increase by >=50% of previously involved sites from nadir) as determined using the 2007 IWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Censoring was applied as per DOR definition.~Computed using Kaplan-Meier method." (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose to the date of initial objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent therapy, or death whichever occurred first (up to approximately 100 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cohort A: Post-Transplant, Never Taken Brentuximab Vedotin12.78
Cohort B: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant10.58
Cohort C: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Pre-and/or Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant14.65

[back to top]

Duration of Objective Response (DOR) Based on Investigator Assessments in Cohorts A, B, and C

"DOR is the time from first response (complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR)) to the date of initial objectively documented progression as determined using the 2007 IWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. For participants who neither progressed nor died, the DOR was censored on the date of their last tumor assessment. Participants who started subsequent therapy without a prior reported progression were censored at the last tumor assessments prior to initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapy.~CR is the percent of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of CR (disappearance of all evidence of disease) according to the 2007 IWG criteria, based on IRRC assessment.~PR is the percent of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of PR (regression of measurable disease and no new sites) according to the 2007 IWG criteria, based on IRRC assessment.~Computed using Kaplan-Meier method." (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose to the date of initial objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent therapy, or death whichever occurred first (up to approximately 100 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cohort A: Post-Transplant, Never Taken Brentuximab Vedotin39.10
Cohort B: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant25.26
Cohort C: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Pre-and/or Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant28.85

[back to top]

Treatment Discontinuation Rate in Cohort D

"Treatment discontinuation rate (TDR) is the number of treated participants who received <4 doses of monotherapy or <12 doses of their assigned combination regimen. A participant is considered as having received an AVD/NAVD dose as soon as they received at least one drug of AVD/NAVD for the considered dose. Participants must have received at least one dose of Nivolumab during the combination therapy phase to be included in participants treated with NAVD. If a participant subsequently met Criteria to Resume Nivolumab Dosing, the combination of nivolumab and AVD could be used. Participants who underwent treatment beyond progression during the Monotherapy phase could use the combination of nivolumab and AVD if all 4 doses of nivolumab monotherapy are completed.~Discontinuation can be due to any reason including, but not limited to, drug-related toxicity, diseases progression, or death." (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose up until the date of treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 100 months).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MonotherapyCombination Therapy (receiving AVD or NAVD)Combination Therapy (NAVD receivers only)Overall Therapy
Cohort D: Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Advanced Stage cHL (Stage IIB, III and IV)2556

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR) Rate at Planned End of Therapy Based on IRRC Assessments in Cohort D

"CR rate is the percent of participants who show CR (disappearance of all evidence of disease) according to the 2007 IWG criteria at the planned end of study therapy radiographic tumor assessment.~Confidence interval based on the Klopper and Pearson method." (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose to the date of initial objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent therapy, or death whichever occurred first (up to approximately 100 months)

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Cohort D: Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Advanced Stage cHL (Stage IIB, III and IV)66.7

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Remission (CR) Based on IRRC Assessments for Cohorts A, B, and C

"The duration of CR was only evaluated in participants with BOR of CR and was defined as the time from first documentation of CR (the date of first negative FDG-PET scan or the date of first documentation of no disease involvement in the bone marrow (if required), whichever occurred later) to the date of initial objectively documented progression (Any new lesion or increase by >=50% of previously involved sites from nadir) as determined using the 2007 IWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Censoring was applied as per DOR definition.~Computed using Kaplan-Meier method." (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose to the date of initial objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent therapy, or death whichever occurred first (up to approximately 100 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cohort A: Post-Transplant, Never Taken Brentuximab Vedotin43.47
Cohort B: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant30.32
Cohort C: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Pre-and/or Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant26.41

[back to top]

Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Dose Delay in Cohort D

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study drug and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (such as an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose of the considered therapy phase to 30 days after last dose of study therapy phase (or up to first dose of combination if any when considering the monotherapy period) (an average of 8 months and a maximum of 11 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MonotherapyCombination Therapy (receiving AVD or NAVD)
Cohort D: Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Advanced Stage cHL (Stage IIB, III and IV)329

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Specific Liver Tests in Cohort D Combination Therapy Phase

The number of participants with laboratory abnormalities in specific liver tests based on SI conventional units. ALT = Alanine Aminotransferase, AST = Aspartate Aminotransferase, ULN = Upper Limit of Normal. (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose of the combination therapy to 30 days after last dose of combination therapy (an average of 8 months and a maximum of 11 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ALT OR AST > 3XULNALT OR AST> 5XULNALT OR AST> 10XULNALT OR AST > 20XULNTOTAL BILIRUBIN > 2XULNALT/AST ELEV>3XULN;TOTAL BILIRUBIN>2XULN IN 1 DAYALT/AST ELEV>3XULN;TOTAL BILIRUBIN>2XULN IN 30 DAYS
Cohort D: Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Advanced Stage cHL (Stage IIB, III and IV)4110000

[back to top]

Duration of Objective Response Based on IRRC Assessments in Cohorts A, B, and C

"DOR is the time from first response (complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR)) to the date of initial objectively documented progression as determined using the 2007 IWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. For participants who neither progressed nor died, the DOR was censored on the date of their last tumor assessment. Participants who started subsequent therapy without a prior reported progression were censored at the last tumor assessments prior to initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapy.~CR is the percent of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of CR (disappearance of all evidence of disease) according to the 2007 IWG criteria, based on IRRC assessment.~PR is the percent of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of PR (regression of measurable disease and no new sites) according to the 2007 IWG criteria, based on IRRC assessment.~Computed using Kaplan-Meier method." (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose to the date of initial objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent therapy, or death whichever occurred first (up to approximately 100 months).

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cohort A: Post-Transplant, Never Taken Brentuximab Vedotin26.18
Cohort B: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant16.59
Cohort C: Post Transplant, Brentuximab Vedotin Taken Pre-and/or Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant18.17

[back to top]

Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation in Cohort D

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study drug and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (such as an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose of the considered therapy phase to 30 days after last dose of study therapy phase (or up to first dose of combination if any when considering the monotherapy period) (an average of 8 months and a maximum of 11 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MonotherapyCombination Therapy (receiving AVD or NAVD)
Cohort D: Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Advanced Stage cHL (Stage IIB, III and IV)13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) in Cohort D

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study drug and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (such as an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose of the considered therapy phase to 30 days after last dose of study therapy phase (or up to first dose of combination if any when considering the monotherapy period) (an average of 8 months and a maximum of 11 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MonotherapyCombination Therapy (receiving AVD or NAVD)
Cohort D: Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Advanced Stage cHL (Stage IIB, III and IV)4849

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants Who Died in Cohort D

Number of participants who died in Cohort D within 100 days after last dose of study therapy. (NCT02181738)
Timeframe: From first dose of the considered therapy phase to 100 days after last dose of study therapy phase (or up to first dose of combination if any when considering the monotherapy period) (an average of 10 months up to a maximum of 13 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MonotherapyCombination Therapy (receiving AVD or NAVD)
Cohort D: Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Advanced Stage cHL (Stage IIB, III and IV)01

[back to top]

Change in Domain Scores From Baseline Using the Patient Reported Skindex-16 Instrument

In this exploratory endpoint, changes in Skindex-16 self-assessment scores were evaluated vs Day 1 baseline domain scores: symptom domain (items 1-4); emotional domain (items 5-11); and functioning domain (items 12-16). The Skindex-16 instrument solicits response to the extent of bother during the preceding week by 16 items (e.g., itching, hurting, worry, impact on daily activities), using a score from 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered) for each item. Item scores are transformed to 0 to 100 scale, and domain scores are calculated as the average of the item scores comprising the domain. A lower domain score at baseline signifies lower impact of that domain; a decrease in domain score from baseline signifies improvement in that domain. Median baseline score and change from baseline over the study interval is presented for each domain. (NCT02288897)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline (Day 1 at start of study treatment) and at the end of each treatment cycle (every 4 or 6 weeks) until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks.

,
InterventionScores on a Scale (0-100) (Median)
Baseline Symptom Domain ScoreChange in Symptom Domain Score from BaselineBaseline Emotional Domain ScoreChange in Emotional Domain Score from BaselineBaseline Functioning Domain ScoreChange in Functioning Domain Score from Baseline
Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy18.8-6.316.7-4.88.36.7
PV-102.1-2.120.2-10.11.7-1.7

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"PFS was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) criteria. Subjects who did not have an event of progression or death were censored at their last assessment date.~Assessment of progression was performed by the sponsor based on review of lesion measurement and clinical progression data reported by each investigator. Events signaling progression included increase in size and/or number of study lesions, onset of visceral metastatic disease, and death. For target lesions (assigned prior to randomization), complete response (CR) required disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR) required >= 30% decrease in sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all target lesions; progressive disease (PD) required >=20% increase in SLD of target lesions. Non-target lesions were followed for CR, PD, or non-CR/non-PD status using equivalent thresholds. Progression occurred when PD was observed in either target or non-target lesion." (NCT02288897)
Timeframe: Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; progression detected between formal assessments was documented at the time of detection; median follow-up time for PFS was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks.

InterventionMonths (Median)
PV-106.1
Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy8.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was documented at 12 week intervals commencing on withdrawal from active study participation. Documentation was made by subject clinic visit or other personal contact, telephonic contact, review of medical records, or other unequivocal evidence of survival status. OS was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis, and was defined as the interval from randomization to death; subjects who did not have an event of death were censored at their last assessment date. (NCT02288897)
Timeframe: Assessed every 12 weeks upon withdrawal from active study participation until death, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for survival was 82.4 weeks, maximum was 167.0 weeks.

InterventionMonths (Median)
PV-10NA
Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral TherapyNA

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate (CRR)

CRR was assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria, and required disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. (NCT02288897)
Timeframe: Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for CRR was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PV-103
Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring the frequency, duration, severity and attribution of adverse events and evaluating changes in laboratory values and vital signs. (NCT02288897)
Timeframe: Assessed every 4 weeks until 28 days after last treatment; median duration of treatment was 11.8 and 9.5 weeks in each treatment group, respectively.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PV-1014
Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy8

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Response (DCR)

DCR was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis for participants achieving a complete response, and was defined as the interval from first complete response to disease progression or death; responders who did not have an event of progression or death were censored at their last assessment date. Complete response was assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria, and required disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. (NCT02288897)
Timeframe: Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for DCR was 26.7 weeks, maximum was 77.7 weeks.

InterventionMonths (Median)
PV-10NA
Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral TherapyNA

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

"The number of patients that achieved a complete response (CR) to therapy as assessed by the revised International Working Group Criteria.~Complete response:~Lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites: Score 1, 2, or 3 with or without a residual mass on 5-point (Daeuville) scale~Bone Marrow: No evidence of FDG-avi disease~No new lesions~Deauville Criteria for PET scan Interpretation in Lymphoma~Five-point scale:~No Uptake~Uptake ≤ mediastinum~Uptake >mediastinum but ≤ liver~Uptake moderately increased compared to liver at any site~Uptake markedly increased compared to the liver at any site or/and new sites of disease" (NCT02505269)
Timeframe: 4-6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Brentuximab Vedotin34

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Grade III and IV Adverse Events

The number of patients that experienced grade III and grade IV adverse events that were deemed to be possibly, probably, or definitely related to study treatment. Adverse events were assessed using Common Toxicology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0) criteria. (NCT02505269)
Timeframe: 4-6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade III Adverse EventsGrade IV Adverse Events
Brentuximab Vedotin40

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

"The number of patients that achieved a complete Metabolic Response (CR) or Partial Metabolic Response (PR) to therapy as assessed by the revised International Working Group Criteria.~Complete Metabolic Response:~Lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites: Score 1, 2, or 3 with or without a residual mass on 5-point (Daeuville) scale Bone Marrow: No evidence of FDG-avi disease No new lesions~Partial Metabolic Response:~>Lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites: Score 4, 5 with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size.~Deauville Criteria for PET scan Interpretation in Lymphoma~Five-point scale:~No Uptake~Uptake ≤ mediastinum~Uptake >mediastinum but ≤ liver~Uptake moderately increased compared to liver at any site~Uptake markedly increased compared to the liver at any site or/and new sites of disease" (NCT02505269)
Timeframe: 4-6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Brentuximab Vedotin34

[back to top]

Two-Years Survival Rate

Two-year survival rate is defined as the probability that a subject is alive at 2 years following the randomization date and will be estimated via the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. (NCT02545075)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg)33.98
Dacarbazine (250 mg/m2)34.09

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival ( PFS)

PFS is defined for each subject as the time between randomization date and the date of progression or death, whichever occurs first. (NCT02545075)
Timeframe: Approximately 43 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg)2.60
Dacarbazine (250 mg/m2)1.84

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Rate ( BORR )

BORR definition is defined as the number of subjects in the arm with a BOR of CR or PR, divided by the total number of randomized subjects in the arm. (NCT02545075)
Timeframe: Approximately 43 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg)8.2
Dacarbazine (250 mg/m2)8.3

[back to top]

Duration of Response ( DoR)

DoR definition for the response evaluable subjects whose BOR is CR or PR is defined as the time between the date of response of CR or PR (whichever occurs first) and the first date of progressive disease (PD) or the date of death (whichever occurs first). (NCT02545075)
Timeframe: Approximately 43 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg)8.99
Dacarbazine (250 mg/m2)7.98

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined for each subject as the time between randomization date and the date of death (of any cause). (NCT02545075)
Timeframe: Approximately 43 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg)15.08
Dacarbazine (250 mg/m2)14.55

[back to top]

One-Year Survival Rate

Survival rate at 1 year is defined as the probability that a subject is alive at 1 year following the randomization date and will be estimated via the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. (NCT02545075)
Timeframe: Approximately 43 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg)61.68
Dacarbazine (250 mg/m2)64.11

[back to top]

Duration of Stable Disease ( DoSD )

"Primary duration of stable disease (DoSD) definition for the randomized subjects whose BOR is SD is defined as the time between the randomization date and the first date of PD or the date of death (whichever occurs first)." (NCT02545075)
Timeframe: Approximately 43 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg)6.83
Dacarbazine (250 mg/m2)9.40

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate ( DCR )

Primary DCR is defined as the number of subjects in the arm with Best Overall Response (BOR) of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD), divided by the total number of randomized subjects in the arm. (NCT02545075)
Timeframe: Approximately 43 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg)32
Dacarbazine (250 mg/m2)31.7

[back to top]

Phase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS per IRF:time from first dose until disease progression per IRF/death due to any cause,whichever occurred first.Participants with no objective progressive disease (PD),did not die,were still on study follow-up at time of analysis were removed from study prior to documentation of PD,PFS was censored on date of last adequate disease assessment before initiation of any non-protocol,alternative therapy.Participants who were on antitumor treatment,other than SCT/radiotherapy,censoring was at last adequate disease assessment before initiation of such alternative treatment.If participant experienced disease progression per IRF/died after initiation of antitumor treatment,other than SCT/radiotherapy,such participant was censored and not considered having PFS.Outcome measure was planned to be assessed for all participant treated at recommended dose in Phase 2.As per SAP,Phase 2 data was summarized and reported in two arms:Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVDNA
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVDNA

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Whose Disease Was Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Negative After 2 Cycles of Protocol Therapy Per IRF Assessment

The Deauville score according to IRF assessment of response was used to evaluate the results of PET scans. PET negative after Cycle 2 was defined as an IRF Deauville score of (1 or 2 or 3). This outcome measure was planned to be assessed for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to Cycle 2 Day 25 (Each Cycle length=28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD90
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD90

[back to top] [back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced SAEs From the First Dose of Protocol Therapy Through 30 Days After Administration of the Last Dose of Protocol Therapy

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: From first dose in Cycle 1 Day 1 until 30 days after the last dose of study drug in Cycle 6 Day 15 (up to Cycle 7 Day 15) (Cycle length=28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD45
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD41

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced AEs From the First Dose of Protocol Therapy Through 30 Days After Administration of the Last Dose of Protocol Therapy

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: From first dose in Cycle 1 Day 1 until 30 days after the last dose of study drug in Cycle 6 Day 15 (up to Cycle 7 Day 15) (Cycle length=28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD100
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD100

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per IRF Assessment Per IWG Criteria at EOT Visit

Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR as assessed by IRF using IWG criteria. CR was defined as the disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR was defined as regression of measurable disease and no new diseases. The confidence interval was based on exact binomial distribution (Clopper-Pearson method). This outcome measure was planned to be assessed for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: At EOT visit 30 days after the last dose of study drug (at Month 7)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD86
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD88

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Partial Remission (PR) Per IRF Assessment Per IWG Criteria at EOT Visit

PR was defined as regression of measurable disease and no new sites as assessed by IRF as per IWG criteria. Percentage of participants in the response-evaluable population who achieved a partial response based on the IRF assessment at the EOT visit based on the IWG criteria are reported. The confidence interval was based on exact binomial distribution (Clopper-Pearson method). This outcome measure was planned to be assessed for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: At EOT visit 30 days after the last dose of study drug (at Month 7)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD12
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD12

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Remission (CR) Per Independent Review Facility (IRF) Assessment Per International Working Group (IWG) Criteria at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit

CR was defined as the disappearance of all evidence of disease as assessed by IRF as per IWG Criteria. The confidence interval was based on exact binomial distribution (Clopper-Pearson method). This outcome measure was planned to be assessed for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in the statistical analysis plan (SAP) , data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: At end of treatment (EOT) visit 30 days after the last dose of study drug (at Month 7)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD75
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD76

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Receiving Irradiation for HL Following Study Treatment

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD25
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD24

[back to top]

Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as time from first dose until death. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, including study closure. This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVDNA
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVDNA

[back to top]

Phase 2: Event-free Survival (EFS)

EFS:Time from first dose until any treatment failure:PD per IRF including progression events during follow-up period,failing to complete 6 cycles of treatment due to any reason or death due to any cause,whichever occurred first.EFS per IRF were censored on last adequate disease assessment date per IRF if none of above events occur during study.Participants with antitumor treatment,other than SCT/radiotherapy as part of frontline treatment were censored at last adequate disease assessment before initiation of such alternative treatment.If a participant experienced disease progression per IRF/died after initiation of antitumor treatment,other than SCT/radiotherapy,such participant was censored,and not be considered having EFS.This outcome measure was planned to be assessed for all patients treated at recommended dose in Phase 2.As prespecified in SAP,data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms:Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVDNA
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVDNA

[back to top]

Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR per IRF in participants with a response (CR or PR per IRF) was defined as the time from start of the first objective tumor response (CR or PR per IRF) to the first subsequent PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. For patients who did not have an objective PD, did not die and are either still on a study follow-up at the time of the analysis, or were removed from the study prior to documentation of PD, DOR has been censored on the date of last adequate disease assessment. This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVDNA
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVDNA

[back to top] [back to top]

Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Whose Disease Was PET Positive After 6 Cycles of Protocol Therapy Per IRF Assessment

The Deauville score according to IRF assessment of response was used to evaluate the results of PET scans. PET positive after Cycle 6 defined as an IRF Deauville score of (4 or 5). This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to Cycle 6 (Each Cycle length=28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 +AVD13

[back to top]

Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Whose Disease Was PET Negative After 2 Cycles of Protocol Therapy Per IRF Assessment

The Deauville score according to IRF assessment of response was used to evaluate the results of PET scans. PET negative after Cycle 2 was defined as an IRF Deauville score of (1 or 2 or 3). This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to Cycle 2 (Each Cycle length=28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 +AVD88

[back to top]

Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) From the First Dose of Protocol Therapy Through 30 Days After Administration of the Last Dose of Protocol Therapy

AE means any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product; the untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it is related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, Is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, Is a medically important event. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: From first dose in Cycle 1 Day 1 until 30 days after the last dose of study drug in Cycle 6 Day 15 (up to Cycle 7 Day 15) (Cycle length=28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 +AVD13

[back to top]

Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs) From the First Dose of Protocol Therapy Through 30 Days After Administration of the Last Dose of Protocol Therapy

AE means any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product; the untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it is related to the medicinal product. This outcome measure is planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: From first dose in Cycle 1 Day 1 until 30 days after the last dose of study drug in Cycle 6 Day 15 (up to Cycle 7 Day 15) (Cycle length=28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 +AVD100

[back to top]

Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an ORR Per IRF Assessment Per IWG Criteria at EOT Visit

Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR as assessed by an IRF using IWG Revised Response Criteria. CR was defined as the disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR was defined as regression of measurable disease and no new sites. The confidence interval was based on exact binomial distribution (Clopper-Pearson method). This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: At EOT visit 30 days after the last dose of study drug (at Month 7)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 +AVD100

[back to top]

Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PR Per IRF Assessment Per IWG Criteria at EOT Visit

PR was defined as regression of measurable disease and no new diseases as per IWG Criteria based on IRF. The confidence interval was based on exact binomial distribution (Clopper-Pearson method). This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: At EOT visit 30 days after the last dose of study drug (at Month 7)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 +AVD13

[back to top]

Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a CR Per IRF Assessment Per IWG Criteria at EOT Visit

CR was defined as the disappearance of all evidence of disease as assessed by IRF as per IWG Criteria. The confidence interval was based on exact binomial distribution (Clopper-Pearson method). This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: At EOT visit 30 days after the last dose of study drug (at Month 7)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 +AVD88

[back to top]

Phase 1: Number of ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants With AEs and SAEs

This outcome measure is planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ATA Negative: AEsATA Positive: AEsATA Negative: SAEsATA Positive: SAEs
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD7101

[back to top]

Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline Total Immunoglobulin at EOT

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT [Month 7]

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at EOT
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD2045.1-556.3
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD2086.6-582.3

[back to top]

Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline Poliovirus Antibodies Ratio at EOT

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT [Month 7]

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Baseline: Type IEOT: Type IBaseline: Type IIIEOT: Type III
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD0.023730.008450.034320.01013
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD0.024470.009130.036410.01141

[back to top]

Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in Total Lymphocyte Count at EOT

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT [Month 7]

,
Intervention10^9 lymphocytes/L (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at EOT
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD1.74080.5965
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD1.80220.6736

[back to top]

Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in the Percentage of CD8+ (CD8+CD45RA-CD197- and CD8+CD45RA-CD197+) Subset of Cells at EOT

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT [Month 7]

,
Interventionpercentage of CD8+ subset cells (Mean)
Baseline: CD8+CD45RA-CD197-Change from Baseline at EOT: CD8+CD45RA-CD197-Baseline: CD8+CD45RA-CD197+Change from Baseline at EOT: CD8+CD45RA-CD197+Baseline: CD8+CD45RA+CD197-Change from Baseline at EOT: CD8+CD45RA+CD197-Baseline: CD8+CD45RA+CD197+Change from Baseline at EOT: CD8+CD45RA+CD197+
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD40.6-11.02.32.125.8-6.530.815.4
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD39.9-11.52.41.625.9-6.031.315.7

[back to top]

Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in the Percentage of CD4+ (CD4+CD45RA-CD197- and CD4+CD45RA+CD197+) Subset of Cells at EOT

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT [Month 7]

,
Interventionpercentage of CD4+ subset cells (Mean)
Baseline: CD4+CD45RA-CD197-Change from Baseline at EOT: CD4+CD45RA-CD197-Baseline: CD4+CD45RA-CD197+Change from Baseline at EOT: CD4+CD45RA-CD197+Baseline: CD4+CD45RA+CD197-Change from Baseline at EOT: CD4+CD45RA+CD197-Baseline: CD4+CD45RA+CD197+Change from Baseline at EOT: CD4+CD45RA+CD197+
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD29.0-5.122.312.63.1-0.746.3-6.8
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD28.0-5.023.713.02.9-0.746.2-7.2

[back to top]

Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in Tetanus at EOT

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT [Month 7]

,
Intervention(IU)/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at EOT
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD1.935-0.914
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD1.636-0.648

[back to top]

Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in Peripheral Blood CD34+A at EOT

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT [Month 7]

,
InterventionµL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at EOT
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD3.917-1.456
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD4.182-1.512

[back to top]

Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin M at the End of Treatment (EOT)

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT [Month 7]

,
Interventiong/L (Mean)
BaselineChange at EOT (Month 7)
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD1.261-0.375
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD1.275-0.345

[back to top]

Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin A at EOT

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT [Month 7]

,
Interventiong/L (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at EOT
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD2.671-0.125
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD2.708-0.195

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Were ATA Positive, Persistently Positive, or Transiently Positive, and nATA Positive

ATA positive was defined as participants who have a positive ATA in any postbaseline sample. Transiently ATA positive was defined as participants who have positive ATA in 1 or 2 postbaseline samples. Persistently ATA positive was defined as participants who have positive ATA in more than 2 postbaseline timepoints. Transiently ATA positive was defined as participants who have positive ATA in 1 or 2 postbaseline samples. nATA positive was defined as participants who have at least one positive nATA in any postbaseline ATA positive sample. Here, percentage of participants who were transiently or persistently ATA positive are considered as ATA positive. This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: From first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 7 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Transiently ATA PositivePersistently ATA PositivenATA Positive
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD703
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD604

[back to top]

Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline in Haemophilus Influenzae B Antibody, IgG at EOT

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT [Month 7]

,
Interventionµg/mL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at EOT
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD9.50-6.03
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD10.39-7.00

[back to top]

Phase 2: Immune Reconstitution-Change From Baseline Immunoglobulin G Levels at End of Treatment (EOT)

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Month 7)

,
Interventiong/L (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at EOT
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD16.217-4.675
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD16.518-4.822

[back to top]

Phase 1: Percentage of Participants With Low and High ATA Titer Values

High ATA titer was defined as participants who have at least one postbaseline ATA titer less than (>) 25. Low ATA titer was defined as participants whose postbaseline ATA titer are all less than or equal to (<=) 25. This outcome measure is planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ATA Titer lowATA Titer High
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD130

[back to top]

Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Who Were Antitherapeutic Antibody (ATA) Positive, Persistently Positive or Transiently Positive, and Neutralizing Antitherapeutic Antibody (nATA) Positive

ATA positive was defined as participants who have a positive ATA in any postbaseline sample. Transiently ATA positive was defined as participants who have positive ATA in 1 or 2 postbaseline samples. Persistently ATA positive was defined as participants who have positive ATA in more than 2 postbaseline timepoints. Transiently ATA positive was defined as participants who have positive ATA in 1 or 2 postbaseline samples. nATA positive was defined as participants who have at least one positive nATA in any postbaseline ATA positive sample. Here, percentage of participants who were transiently or persistently ATA positive are considered as ATA positive. This outcome measure is planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Up to 7 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Transiently ATA PositivePersistently ATA PositivenATA Positive
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 +AVD1300

[back to top]

Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving CR Per IRF Assessment Per IWG Criteria in ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants

CR was defined as the disappearance of all evidence of disease as assessed by IRF as per IWG Criteria. The data is reported per ATA status as categories. This outcome measure is planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ATA Negative who Achieved CRTransiently ATA Positive who Achieved CR
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD86100

[back to top]

Phase 1: Median Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of MMAE in Plasma

This outcome measure is planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 3 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

Interventionhour (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 15
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 +AVD44.943.148.048.2

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Low and High ATA Titer Values

High ATA titer was defined as participants who have at least one postbaseline ATA titer >25. Low ATA titer was defined as participants whose postbaseline ATA titer are all <=25. This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ATA Titer LowATA Titer High
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD70
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD60

[back to top]

Phase 2: Time to Onset and Resolution for All Peripheral Neuropathy Events

Time to onset of first event was defined as time from first dose of study drug to onset of first treatment-emergent PN event. Time to resolution was calculated as the time from onset date to the date of resolution PN (SMQ) event. Participants with multiple resolved events were counted once at the longest time to resolution. Resolution was defined as an event outcome of resolved or resolved with sequelae. This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

,
Interventionweeks (Median)
Time to OnsetTime to Resolution
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD5.931.57
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD5.931.57

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving CR Per IRF Assessment Per IWG Criteria in ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants

CR is defined as the disappearance of all evidence of disease as assessed by IRF as per IWG Criteria. This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ATA NegativeTransiently ATA Positive
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD7675
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD7567

[back to top]

Phase 1: Median Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of Brentuximab Vedotin and TAb in Serum

This outcome measure is planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Cycle 1-6: Days 1 and 15 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

Interventionhour (Median)
Tmax of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 1 Day 1Tmax of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 1 Day 15Tmax of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 3 Day 1Tmax of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 3 Day 15Tmax of TAb at Cycle 1 Day 1Tmax of TAb at Cycle 1 Day 15
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 +AVD1.000.9151.000.8301.000.915

[back to top]

Phase 1: Mean Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Brentuximab Vedotin Total Conjugated and Therapeutic Antibody (TAb)

This outcome measure is planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 3 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

Interventionmicrogram per milliliter(mcg/mL) (Mean)
Conjugate Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 1 Day 1Conjugate Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 1 Day 15Conjugate Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 3 Day 1Conjugate Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 3 Day 15TAb at Cycle 1 Day 1TAb at Cycle 1 Day 15TAb at Cycle 3 Day 1TAb at Cycle 3 Day 15
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 +AVD22.623.126.727.324.925.529.628.1

[back to top]

Phase 1: Mean Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Monomethyl Auristatin E (MMAE)

This outcome measure is planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 3 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/ml) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 15
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 +AVD5.512.081.381.19

[back to top]

Phase 2: Number of ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants With AEs and SAEs

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ATA Negative: AEsATA Positive: AEsATA Negative: SAEsATA Positive: SAEs
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD554213
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD483212

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Peripheral Neuropathy, Regardless of Seriousness, From the First Dose of Protocol Therapy

Peripheral Neuropathy (PN) was defined by the peripheral neuropathy standardized MedDRA query (SMQ) broad search. This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD20
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD19

[back to top]

Phase 2: Median Tmax of MMAE in Plasma

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 3 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

,
Interventionhour (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 15
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD44.442.945.346.0
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD44.142.944.945.4

[back to top]

Phase 2: Median Tmax of Brentuximab Vedotin and TAb in Serum

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 3 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

,
Interventionhour (Median)
Tmax of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 1 Day 1Tmax of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 1 Day 15Tmax of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 3 Day 1Tmax of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 3 Day 15Tmax of TAb at Cycle 1 Day 1Tmax of TAb at Cycle 1 Day 15Tmax of TAb at Cycle 3 Day 1Tmax of TAb at Cycle 3 Day 15
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD1.031.001.001.001.011.001.001.00

[back to top]

Phase 2: Mean Serum Cmax of Brentuximab Vedotin and TAb

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 3 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

,
Interventionµg/mL (Mean)
Cmax of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 1 Day 1Cmax of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 1 Day 15Cmax of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 3 Day 1Cmax of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 3 Day 15Cmax of TAb Vedotin at Cycle 1 Day 1Cmax of TAb Vedotin at Cycle 1 Day 15Cmax of TAb Vedotin at Cycle 3 Day 1Cmax of TAb Vedotin at Cycle 3 Day 15
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD23.024.927.325.822.426.429.531.4
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD23.125.327.425.422.126.529.532.2

[back to top]

Phase 2: Mean Serum AUC0-15d of Brentuximab Vedotin and TAb

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 3 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

,
Interventionday*µg/mL (Mean)
AUC0-15d of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 1 Day 1AUC0-15d of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 1 Day 15AUC0-15d of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 3 Day 1AUC0-15d of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 3 Day 15AUC0-15d of TAb at Cycle 1 Day 1AUC0-15d of TAb at Cycle 1 Day 15AUC0-15d of TAb at Cycle 3 Day 1AUC0-15d of TAb at Cycle 3 Day 15
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD48.854.063.961.477.698.1120125
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD49.754.962.660.677.297.3119124

[back to top]

Phase 2: Mean AUC 0-15 of Brentuximab Vedotin in ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Cycle 1-3: Days 1 and 15 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

,
Interventionday*µg/mL (Mean)
ATA Positive: Cycle 1 Day 1ATA Positive: Cycle 1 Day 15ATA Positive: Cycle 3 Day 1ATA Positive: Cycle 3 Day 15ATA Negative: Cycle 1 Day 1ATA Negative: Cycle 1 Day 15ATA Negative: Cycle 3 Day 1ATA Negative: Cycle 3 Day 15
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD49.346.754.659.148.854.864.461.7
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD51.645.653.757.249.655.863.060.9

[back to top]

Phase 1: Mean Cmax of Brentuximab Vedotin in ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants

This outcome measure is planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 and 3: Days 1 and 15 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

Interventionµg/mL (Mean)
ATA Positive: Cycle 1 Day 1ATA Positive: Cycle 1 Day 15ATA Positive: Cycle 3 Day 1ATA Positive: Cycle 3 Day 15ATA Negative: Cycle 1 Day 1ATA Negative: Cycle 1 Day 15ATA Negative: Cycle 3 Day 1ATA Negative: Cycle 3 Day 15
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD23.321.123.121.622.523.527.228.3

[back to top]

Phase 1: Mean AUC 0-15d of Brentuximab Vedotin in ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants

This outcome measure is planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 and 3: Days 1 and 15 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

Interventionday*µg/mL (Mean)
ATA Positive: Cycle 1 Day 1ATA Positive: Cycle 1 Day 15ATA Positive: Cycle 3 Day 1ATA Positive: Cycle 3 Day 15ATA Negative: Cycle 1 Day 1ATA Negative: Cycle 1 Day 15ATA Negative: Cycle 3 Day 1ATA Negative: Cycle 3 Day 15
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD42.450.056.663.042.248.675.465.1

[back to top]

Phase 1: Mean Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Day 0 to Day 15 (AUC0-15) of Brentuximab Vedotin and TAb

This outcome measure is planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 3 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

Interventionday*microgram per milliliter(day*mcg/mL) (Mean)
AUC0-15d of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 1 Day 1AUC0-15d of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 1 Day 15AUC0-15d of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 3 Day 1AUC0-15d of Brentuximab Vedotin at Cycle 3 Day 15AUC0-15d of TAb at Cycle 1 Day 1AUC0-15d of TAb at Cycle 1 Day 15AUC0-15d of TAb at Cycle 3 Day 1AUC0-15d of TAb at Cycle 3 Day 15
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 +AVD42.348.872.764.880.6103127128

[back to top]

Phase 1: Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Day 0 to Day 15 (AUC0-15) of MMAE

This outcome measure is planned to be assessed only for participants treated in Phase 1 arm. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 3 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

Interventionday* nanogram per milliliter (day*ng/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 15
Phase 1: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 +AVD29.813.18.887.17

[back to top]

Phase 2: Mean Plasma Cmax of MMAE

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 3 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 15
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD5.492.811.691.61
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD5.492.951.751.74

[back to top]

Phase 2: Mean Plasma AUC0-15 of MMAE

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 3 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

,
Interventionday*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 15
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD31.017.911.111.3
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD31.218.411.512.3

[back to top]

Phase 2: Mean Cmax of Brentuximab Vedotin in ATA Positive and ATA Negative Participants

This outcome measure was planned to be assessed only for all participants treated at the recommended dose in Phase 2. As prespecified in SAP, data for Phase 2 was summarized and reported in two arms: Phase 2 and Phase 1 + Phase 2. (NCT02979522)
Timeframe: Cycle 1-3: Days 1 and 15 pre-infusion and up to 30 minutes after the end of infusion (Cycle length=28 days)

,
Interventionµg/mL (Mean)
ATA Positive: Cycle 1 Day 1ATA Positive: Cycle 1 Day 15ATA Positive: Cycle 3 Day 1ATA Positive: Cycle 3 Day 15ATA Negative: Cycle 1 Day 1ATA Negative: Cycle 1 Day 15ATA Negative: Cycle 3 Day 1ATA Negative: Cycle 3 Day 15
Phase 1 + Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD26.722.722.424.222.725.227.626.0
Phase 2: Brentuximab Vedotin 48 mg/m^2 + AVD27.823.322.025.622.825.427.725.4

[back to top]

Quality-of-Life: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status

Global health status and quality of life was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The score range for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning and better global health status and health-related quality of life. A positive change indicates improvement. (NCT03070392)
Timeframe: EORTC QLQ-C30 was assessed at baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1) and on Day 1 of every other cycle to Cycle 5 Day 1, every fourth cycle thereafter, beginning with Cycle 9 Day 1 and End of Treatment (EOT), up to 36 months. Each cycle is 21 days.

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline Cycle 1Change at Cycle 3Change at Cycle 5Change at Cycle 9Change at Cycle 13Change at Cycle 17Change at Cycle 21Change at Cycle 25Change at Cycle 29Change at EOT
Investigator's Choice74.872-0.238-10.227-8.333-10.185-4.167-4.1670.000.00-10.539
Tebentafusp76.1080.952-1.152-2.193-5.625-10.1850.758-2.381-8.333-10.417

[back to top]

Quality-of-Life: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D,5L Domain Scores

General health status was assessed using the EQ-5D,5L questionnaire, which includes five dimensions (5D): mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 scoring levels, where 1 indicates a better health state (no problems) and 3 indicates a worse health state. A positive change indicates improvement. (NCT03070392)
Timeframe: EQ-5D,5L was assessed at baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1) and on Day 1 of every other cycle to Cycle 5 Day 1, every fourth cycle thereafter, beginning with Cycle 9 Day 1 and End of Treatment (EOT), up to 36 months. Each cycle is 21 days.

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Mobility - Baseline Cycle 1Mobility - Change at Cycle 3Mobility - Change at Cycle 5Mobility - Change at Cycle 9Mobility - Change at Cycle 13Mobility - Change at Cycle 17Mobility - Change at Cycle 21Mobility - Change at Cycle 25Mobility - Change at Cycle 29Mobility - Change at EOTSelf-care - Baseline Cycle 1Self-care - Change at Cycle 3Self-care - Change at Cycle 5Self-care - Change at Cycle 9Self-care - Change at Cycle 13Self-care - Change at Cycle 17Self-care - Change at Cycle 21Self-care - Change at Cycle 25Self-care - Change at Cycle 29Self-care - Change at EOTUsual activities - Baseline Cycle 1Usual activities - Change at Cycle 3Usual activities - Change at Cycle 5Usual activities - Change at Cycle 9Usual activities - Change at Cycle 13Usual activities - Change at Cycle 17Usual activities - Change at Cycle 21Usual activities - Change at Cycle 25Usual activities - Change at Cycle 29Usual activities - Change at EOTPain/Discomfort - Baseline Cycle 1Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 3Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 5Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 9Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 13Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 17Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 21Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 25Pain/Discomfort - Change at Cycle 29Pain/Discomfort - Change at EOTAnxiety/Depression - Baseline Cycle 1Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 3Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 5Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 9Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 13Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 17Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 21Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 25Anxiety/Depression - Change at Cycle 29Anxiety/Depression - Change at EOT
Investigator's Choice1.30.10.30.00.30.20.50.00.00.41.10.00.00.00.10.00.00.00.00.11.30.10.20.10.10.20.00.00.00.51.50.10.2-0.10.10.30.01.00.50.41.7-0.30.00.1-0.10.00.00.00.50.2
Tebentafusp1.2-0.10.00.0-0.10.30.00.10.00.31.10.00.00.00.10.10.00.00.00.11.20.20.10.20.30.50.30.30.20.41.50.00.00.10.10.40.20.00.10.21.8-0.2-0.2-0.3-0.4-0.4-0.5-0.4-0.60.3

[back to top]

Safety: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Safety was defined as the number of participants with treatment emergent adverse events, including laboratory abnormalities, ECG changes, and/or physical examination findings. (NCT03070392)
Timeframe: Safety was assessed from informed consent through 90 days after end of treatment, up to 36 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tebentafusp245
Investigator's Choice105

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Tebentafusp Concentration

Serum PK concentrations of tebentafusp were collected over time. (NCT03070392)
Timeframe: PK concentrations were assessed at pre-dose, end of infusion and anytime in the 12 to 24 hour window after completion of the infusion in Cycle 1 on Days 1, 8 and 15.

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 - End of InfusionCycle 1 Day 1 - 12 to 24 hours post-infusionCycle 1 Day 8 - End of InfusionCycle 1 Day 8 - 12 to 24 hours post-infusionCycle 1 Day 15 - End of InfusionCycle 1 Day 15 - 12 to 24 hours post-infusion
Tebentafusp4201.929505.1005787.139738.60213715.9141685.354

[back to top]

Efficacy: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization to the date of progression (RECIST v1.1) or death due to any cause. (NCT03070392)
Timeframe: PFS was assessed every 3 months from randomization until disease progression or death, up to 36 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Tebentafusp3.3
Investigator's Choice2.9

[back to top]

Efficacy: Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to date of death due to any cause. (NCT03070392)
Timeframe: From randomization to the data cut off date of 13-Oct-2020; median follow-up duration was 14.1 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Tebentafusp21.7
Investigator's Choice16.0

[back to top]

Quality-of-life: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Score (VAS)

The EQ-5D VAS score records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, with 0 being the worst imaginable health state and 100 being the best imaginable health state. A positive change indicates improvement. (NCT03070392)
Timeframe: EQ-5D,5L VAS was assessed at baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1) and on Day 1 of every other cycle to Cycle 5 Day 1, every fourth cycle thereafter, beginning with Cycle 9 Day 1 and End of Treatment (EOT), up to 36 months. Each cycle is 21 days.

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline Cycle 1Change at Cycle 3Change at Cycle 5Change at Cycle 9Change at Cycle 13Change at Cycle 17Change at Cycle 21Change at Cycle 25Change at Cycle 29Change at EOT
Investigator's Choice80.4-0.8-0.7-3.3-2.6-8.5-1.0-4.0-2.0-11.7
Tebentafusp81.00.40.6-0.9-2.0-10.2-1.8-13.60.0-10.1

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR) With Pembrolizumab Treatment Alone

"To assess the primary objective of response rate following PET #2 performed after 3 doses of pembrolizumab. PET response will be assessed using the Lugano Criteria (2014) which recommends the 5 point Deauville score for assessing response. The Deauville five-point scale is an internationally-recommended scale for routine clinical reporting and clinical trials using FDG PET-CT in the initial staging and assessment of treatment response in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Patients with a Deauville score of 1-3 will be considered a complete response.~Deauville criteria is defined as follows:~No residual uptake~Slight uptake, but below blood pool (mediastinum)~Uptake above mediastinum, but below or equal to uptake in the liver~Uptake slightly to moderately higher than liver~Markedly increased uptake or any new lesions~Patients will be evaluable for response assessment if they have received at least one dose of pembrolizumab." (NCT03226249)
Timeframe: After 3 cycles of pembrolizumab (1 cycle = 21 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment: Pembrolizumab and AVD Chemotherapy Guided by PET-CT37

[back to top]

Overall Survival at Treatment Completion

Overall survival will be defined as the number of patients that are alive at the time of treatment completion (3 cycles of pembrolizumab and 2-6 cycles of AVD) (NCT03226249)
Timeframe: At completion of treatment with 3 cycles of pembrolizumab (21 day cycles) and up to 6 cycles of AVD (28 days cycles)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment: Pembrolizumab and AVD Chemotherapy Guided by PET-CT30

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Treatment Completion

"PFS is defined as the number of patients that are progression/relapse free at the time of treatment completion (3 cycles of pembrolizumab and up to 6 cycles of AVD).~Progressive or relapse disease is defined as of the following:~Appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during treatment, even if other lesions are decreasing in size.~At least a 50% increased from nadir in the sum of the product of the diameter (SPD) of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered progressive disease, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of less than 1.0 cm must increase by at least 50% and to a size of more than 1.5 x 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis.~At least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node more than 1.0 cm in its short axis.~Lymphoma confirmed by repeat biopsy." (NCT03226249)
Timeframe: At completion of treatment with 3 cycles of pembrolizumab (21 day cycles) and up to 6 cycles of AVD (28 days cycles)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment: Pembrolizumab and AVD Chemotherapy Guided by PET-CT30

[back to top]

Subsequent Anticancer Therapy Utilization Rate (Part A)

Number of participants with subsequent anticancer therapy (NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 33.8 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with any subsequent therapyConsolidative radiotherapy: RadiotherapyConsolidative radiotherapy: Proton radiationImmunotherapy: NivolumabMaintenance: NivolumabMaintenance radiotherapy: Radiation therapySystemic therapy for progressive disease: Bendamustine monotherapySystemic therapy for relapsed disease: Nivolumab
Part A63111111

[back to top]

Relative Dose Intensity (Part A)

(NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 6.5 months

Interventionpercentage of intended dose (Mean)
Brentuximab vedotinDoxorubicinVinblastineDacarbazine
Part A91.094.289.094.0

[back to top]

Rate of Dose Reduction and Delays: Vinblastine (Part A)

(NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 6.5 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with any dose modificationParticipants with any dose delayParticipants with any dose delay due to AEParticipants with any dose delay due to other reasonParticipants with any dose reduction due to AE
Part A2722151412

[back to top]

Rate of Dose Reduction and Delays: Doxorubicin (Part A)

(NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 6.5 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with any dose modificationParticipants with any dose delayParticipants with any dose delay due to AEParticipants with any dose delay due to other reasonParticipants with any dose reduction due to AE
Part A252315157

[back to top]

Rate of Dose Reduction and Delays: Dacarbazine (Part A)

(NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 6.5 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with any dose modificationParticipants with any dose delayParticipants with any dose delay due to AEParticipants with any dose delay due to other reasonParticipants with any dose reduction due to AE
Part A252215146

[back to top]

Rate of Dose Reduction and Delays: Brentuximab Vedotin (Part A)

(NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 6.5 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with any dose modificationParticipants with any dose delayParticipants with any dose delay due to AEParticipants with any dose delay due to other reasonParticipants with any dose reduction due to AE
Part A2922151414

[back to top]

Incidence of Laboratory Abnormalities (Parts B and C)

Laboratory values were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4.03). (NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 8.9 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hemoglobin high, Grade 1Hemoglobin high, Grade 2Hemoglobin high, Grade 3Hemoglobin high, Grade 4Hemoglobin low, Grade 1Hemoglobin low, Grade 2Hemoglobin low, Grade 3Hemoglobin low, Grade 4Leukocytes high, Grade 1Leukocytes high, Grade 2Leukocytes high, Grade 3Leukocytes high, Grade 4Leukocytes low, Grade 1Leukocytes low, Grade 2Leukocytes low, Grade 3Leukocytes low, Grade 4Lymphocytes high, Grade 1Lymphocytes high, Grade 2Lymphocytes high, Grade 3Lymphocytes high, Grade 4Lymphocytes low, Grade 1Lymphocytes low, Grade 2Lymphocytes low, Grade 3Lymphocytes low, Grade 4Neutrophils low, Grade 1Neutrophils low, Grade 2Neutrophils low, Grade 3Neutrophils low, Grade 4Neutrophils low, value missingPlatelets low, Grade 1Platelets low, Grade 2Platelets low, Grade 3Platelets low, Grade 4Alanine aminotransferase high, Grade 1Alanine aminotransferase high, Grade 2Alanine aminotransferase high, Grade 3Alanine aminotransferase high, Grade 4Albumin low, Grade 1Albumin low, Grade 2Albumin low, Grade 3Albumin low, Grade 4Alkaline phosphatase high, Grade 1Alkaline phosphatase high, Grade 2Alkaline phosphatase high, Grade 3Alkaline phosphatase high, Grade 4Amylase high, Grade 1Amylase high, Grade 2Amylase high, Grade 3Amylase high, Grade 4Aspartate aminotransferase high, Grade 1Aspartate aminotransferase high, Grade 2Aspartate aminotransferase high, Grade 3Aspartate aminotransferase high, Grade 4Calcium corrected for albumin high, Grade 1Calcium corrected for albumin high, Grade 2Calcium corrected for albumin high, Grade 3Calcium corrected for albumin high, Grade 4Calcium corrected for albumin low, Grade 1Calcium corrected for albumin low, Grade 2Calcium corrected for albumin low, Grade 3Calcium corrected for albumin low, Grade 4Ionized calcium high, Grade 1Ionized calcium high, Grade 2Ionized calcium high, Grade 3Ionized calcium high, Grade 4Ionized calcium low, Grade 1Ionized calcium low, Grade 2Ionized calcium low, Grade 3Ionized calcium low, Grade 4Creatinine high, Grade 1Creatinine high, Grade 2Creatinine high, Grade 3Creatinine high, Grade 4Estimated glomerular filtration rate low, Grade 1Estimated glomerular filtration rate low, Grade 2Estimated glomerular filtration rate low, Grade 3Estimated glomerular filtration rate low, Grade 4Estimated glomerular filtration rate low, value missingGlucose high, Grade 1Glucose high, Grade 2Glucose high, Grade 3Glucose high, Grade 4Glucose low, Grade 1Glucose low, Grade 2Glucose low, Grade 3Glucose low, Grade 4Lipase high, Grade 1Lipase high, Grade 2Lipase high, Grade 3Lipase high, Grade 4Phosphate low, Grade 1Phosphate low, Grade 2Phosphate low, Grade 3Phosphate low, Grade 4Potassium high, Grade 1Potassium high, Grade 2Potassium high, Grade 3Potassium high, Grade 4Potassium low, Grade 1Potassium low, Grade 2Potassium low, Grade 3Potassium low, Grade 4Sodium high, Grade 1Sodium high, Grade 2Sodium high, Grade 3Sodium high, Grade 4Sodium low, Grade 1Sodium low, Grade 2Sodium low, Grade 3Sodium low, Grade 4Total bilirubin high, Grade 1Total bilirubin high, Grade 2Total bilirubin high, Grade 3Total bilirubin high, Grade 4Urate high, Grade 1Urate high, Grade 2Urate high, Grade 3Urate high, Grade 4
Part B000037101000001912000100111971414422610026340113003020032002712012000700000000000475101400045511121009150172030009021200011020120000100
Part C4000966100000412420030031279012381130221007116100226005110015660757101800051000000000012511008110026911130180001366331440610019000301025020800000281

[back to top]

Febrile Neutropenia (FN) Rate (Part A)

The FN rate is defined as the number of participants who experience treatment-emergent FN. (NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 7.5 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any treatment-emergent FNTreatment-related treatment-emergent FNGrade 3 or higher treatment-emergent FNGrade 3 or higher treatment-related treatment-emergent FN
Part A5555

[back to top]

Actual Dose Intensity: Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine (Part A)

(NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 6.5 months

Interventionmg/m2/week (Mean)
DoxorubicinVinblastineDacarbazine
Part A11.82.7176.3

[back to top]

Primary Refractory Disease Rate (Part A)

The primary refractory disease rate is defined as the percentage of participants with less than complete response or relapse within 3 months of EOT, according to the Lugano Classification Revised Staging System for nodal non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphomas (NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 10.2 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part A10

[back to top]

Physician-reported Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Part A)

The physician-reported PFS rate at 2 years is estimated based on Kaplan-Meier methodology. (NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part A89.23

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) at EOT (Parts B and C)

ORR is defined as the proportion of participants with CR or partial response (PR) at EOT according to the Lugano Classification Revised Staging System for malignant lymphoma (Cheson 2014) with the incorporation of LYRIC (Cheson 2016) in subjects with previously untreated cHL. (NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 7.8 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part B93
Part C95

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate (Part A)

The complete response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with CR at EOT according to the Lugano Classification Revised Staging System for nodal non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphomas (Cheson 2014). (NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 7.2 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part A80

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR) Rate (Parts B and C)

CR rate at EOT is defined as the percentage of subjects with CR at EOT, according to the Lugano Classification Revised Staging System for malignant lymphoma (Cheson 2014) with the incorporation of LYRIC (Cheson 2016), in subjects with previously untreated cHL. (NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 7.8 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part B88
Part C90

[back to top]

Actual Dose Intensity: Brentuximab Vedotin (Part A)

(NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 6.5 months

Interventionmg/kg/week (Mean)
Part A0.5

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events (Parts B and C)

(NCT03646123)
Timeframe: 8.9 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)Treatment-related TEAEGrade 3 or higher TEAEGrade 3 or higher treatment-related TEAEAny treatment-emergent serious adverse event (SAE)Treatment-related treatment-emergent SAEParticipants who discontinued treatment due to TEAEParticipants who discontinued treatment due to treatment-related TEAETEAE leading to death
Part B57562919158440
Part C15314967522919440

[back to top]