Page last updated: 2024-12-06

sufentanil

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Sufentanil: An opioid analgesic that is used as an adjunct in anesthesia, in balanced anesthesia, and as a primary anesthetic agent. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

sufentanil : An anilide resulting from the formal condensation of the aryl amino group of 4-(methoxymethyl)-N-phenyl-1-[2-(2-thienyl)ethyl]piperidin-4-amine with propanoic acid. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID41693
CHEMBL ID658
CHEBI ID9316
SCHEMBL ID26728
MeSH IDM0026423

Synonyms (77)

Synonym
r-30730
arx-04
arx-f02
n-{4-[(methyloxy)methyl]-1-[2-(2-thienyl)ethyl]piperidin-4-yl}-n-phenylpropanamide
PDSP1_001741
sufentanil (usan/inn)
D05938
OPREA1_120838
PDSP2_001724
56030-54-7
sufentanil
C08022
n-(4-(methoxymethyl)-1-(2-(2-thienyl)ethyl)-4-piperidinyl)-n-phenylpropanamide
n-(4-(methoxymethyl)-1-(2-(2-thienyl)ethyl)-4-piperidyl)propionanilide
DB00708
sufentanyl
OPREA1_246787
chronogesic
propanamide, n-(4-(methoxymethyl)-1-(2-(2-thienyl)ethyl)-4-piperidinyl)-n-phenyl-
hsdb 6760
sufentanilum [inn-latin]
r 30730
sulfentanil
sulfentanyl
chebi:9316 ,
ids-ns-001
r 30,730
CHEMBL658
n-[4-(methoxymethyl)-1-(2-thiophen-2-ylethyl)piperidin-4-yl]-n-phenylpropanamide
L000580
sufentanilum
n-{4-(methoxymethyl)-1-[2-(2-thienyl)ethyl]piperidin-4-yl}-n-phenylpropanamide
NCGC00247355-01
unii-afe2yw0iiz
sufentanil [usan:inn:ban]
zalviso
afe2yw0iiz ,
arx04
arx 04
bdbm94503
2-hydroxypropane-1,2,3-tricarboxylic acid;n-[4-(methoxymethyl)-1-(2-thiophen-2-ylethyl)-4-piperidinyl]-n-phenylpropanamide
cid_65494
n-[4-(methoxymethyl)-1-(2-thiophen-2-ylethyl)piperidin-4-yl]-n-phenyl-propanamide;2-oxidanylpropane-1,2,3-tricarboxylic acid
citric acid;n-[4-(methoxymethyl)-1-[2-(2-thienyl)ethyl]-4-piperidyl]-n-phenyl-propionamide
EPITOPE ID:153513
gtpl3534
sufentanil [mi]
sufentanil [usan]
sufentanil [inn]
sufentanil [who-dd]
sufentanil [vandf]
n-[4-(methoxymethyl)-1-[2-(2-thienyl)ethyl]-4-piperidyl]propionanilide
sufentanil [ep monograph]
sufentanil [hsdb]
sufentanil [mart.]
HY-13754
n-(4-(methoxymethyl)-1-(2-(thiophen-2-yl)ethyl)piperidin-4-yl)-n-phenylpropionamide
n-[4-(methoxymethyl)-1-{2-(2-thienyl)ethyl}-4-piperidinyl]-n-phenylpropanamide
SCHEMBL26728
n-[4-(methoxymethyl)-1-[2-(2-thienyl)ethyl]-4-piperidinyl]propionalnalide
n-(4-(methoxymethyl)-1-[2-(2-thienyl)ethyl]-4-piperidinyl)-n-phenylpropanamide #
propanamide, n-[4-(methoxymethyl)-1-[2-(2-thienyl)ethyl]-4-piperidinyl]-n-phenyl-
DTXSID6023604 ,
n-[4-(methoxymethyl)-1-[2-(thiophen-2-yl)ethyl]piperidin-4-yl]-n-phenylpropanamide
Q417915
dsuvia (brand name)
sufenta (brand name)
sufentanil (mart.)
sufentanilum (inn-latin)
sufentanilum (latin)
sufentanil (ep monograph)
sufentanilo
dtxcid103604
n-(4-(methoxymethyl)-1-(2-(2-thienyl)ethyl)piperidin-4-yl)-n-phenylpropanamide
n01ah03
sufentanil, 1mg/ml in methanol
sufentanil; n-[4-(methoxymethyl)-1-[2-(thiophen-2-yl)ethyl]piperidin-4-yl]-n-phenylpropanamide

Research Excerpts

Overview

Sufentanil is an inexpensive synthetic opioid with a high therapeutic index and rapid onset of action, making it an attractive agent for management of acute pain in the ED. It is usually used to facilitate painless labor in combination with the local anesthetic ropivacaine.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Sufentanil is a commonly used opioid anesthetic in clinics."( Sufentanil inhibits the proliferation and epithelial mesenchymal transition of lung cancer cells through Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway.
Guan, M; Huang, Y; Lin, X, 2022
)
2.89
"Sufentanil is a feasible, safe, and effective analgesic for MWA in patients with pulmonary nodules. "( Safety and efficacy of microwave ablation to treat pulmonary nodules under conscious analgosedation with sufentanil: A single-center clinical experience.
Cao, P; Kong, Y; Li, Z; Meng, W; Wang, N; Wei, Z; Xue, G; Ye, X, 2022
)
2.38
"Sufentanil is a potent opioid uncommonly used to manage pain and is rarely administered via an intrathecal pain pump system."( Malfunctioning sufentanil intrathecal pain pump: a case report.
Branstad, A; Eldrige, J; Hunter Guevara, L; Matzke Bitterman, L; Nicholson, W; Pingree, M; Warner, L, 2020
)
2.35
"Sufentanil is a selective µ-opioid agonist, used intravenously and intrathecally for moderate to severe acute pain. "( An up-to-date overview of sublingual sufentanil for the treatment of moderate to severe pain.
Kokki, H; Kokki, M; Porela-Tiihonen, S, 2020
)
2.27
"Sufentanil is a potent synthetic opioid used for analgesia in neonates; however, data concerning drug disposition of sufentanil and dosage regimen are sparse in this population. "( Sufentanil Disposition and Pharmacokinetic Model-Based Dosage Regimen for Sufentanil in Ventilated Full-Term Neonates.
Koch, B; Pokorná, P; Šíma, M; Slanař, O; Tibboel, D, 2021
)
3.51
"Sufentanil is a potent analgesic drug used for pain management. "( Sufentanil pharmacokinetics in a full-term neonate treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case report.
Bašková, M; Pokorná, P; Posch, L; Šíma, M; Slanař, O; Vobruba, V, 2019
)
3.4
"Sufentanil is an inexpensive synthetic opioid with a high therapeutic index and rapid onset of action, making it an attractive agent for management of acute pain in the ED."( Intranasal Sufentanil Versus Intravenous Morphine for Acute Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Pilot Trial.
Adebayo, A; Davenport, L; de Souza, S; Halpern, Z; Jeffrey, I; Lee, AS; Persaud, K; Ruiz, J; Sin, B; Williams, M; Wing, T, 2019
)
1.63
"Sufentanil is a type of opioid analgesic and is usually used to facilitate painless labor in combination with the local anesthetic ropivacaine. "( By regulating miR-182-5p/BCL10/CYCS, sufentanil reduces the apoptosis of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells caused by ropivacaine.
Li, L; Luo, Q; Qiu, X; Sun, Y; Wang, L; Zhang, N, 2019
)
2.23
"Sufentanil is a μ-opioid agonist with a high therapeutic index in preclinical studies and no active metabolites, and it is highly lipophilic, thereby enabling a transmucosal route of administration. "( Pharmacokinetic properties of single- and repeated-dose sufentanil sublingual tablets in healthy volunteers.
Chiang, YK; Evashenk, MA; Hamel, LG; Hwang, SS; Palmer, PP; Willsie, SK, 2015
)
2.11
"Sufentanil is a highly selective µ-opioid agonist commonly used by intravenous and intrathecal routes for acute pain. "( Sufentanil sublingual formulation for the treatment of acute, moderate to severe postoperative pain in adult patients.
Kokki, H; Kokki, M; Porela-Tiihonen, S, 2017
)
3.34
"Sufentanil is a more potent and more lipophilic analgesic than fentanyl."( [New opioids for general anaesthesia and in- and out-hospital analgesia].
Dabrowska-Wójciak, I; Piotrowski, A,
)
0.85
"Sufentanil is a suitable choice for target-controlled infusion (TCI) because of its shorter context-sensitive half-time. "( Two-stage analysis of pharmacokinetics of sufentanil administered by target-controlled infusion in Chinese patients.
Duan, JL; Jia, DL; Jiang, JY; Liu, W; Lu, W; Meng, XL; Sheng, XY; Wang, J; Wu, XM; Xu, CY; Zhang, LP; Zhao, Y, 2009
)
2.06
"Sufentanil is a potent synthetic opioid. "( Aspects of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sufentanil in pediatric practice.
Lundeberg, S; Roelofse, JA, 2011
)
2.06
"Sufentanil (SUF) is a synthetic analgesic opioid widely used for the management of acute and chronic pain. "( Sufentanil-2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex for pain treatment: physicochemical, cytotoxicity, and pharmacological evaluation.
Braga, AF; Cereda, CM; De Araujo, DR; De Paula, E; Fraceto, LF; Franco, MK; Moraes, CM; Nunes, LA; Tófoli, GR; Volobuef, C; Yokaichiya, F, 2012
)
3.26
"Sufentanil (S) is a very potent opioid with high micro-receptor affinity, a much wider therapeutic index and a lower fractional receptor occupancy."( Analgesic transition after remifentanil-based anesthesia in neurosurgery. A comparison of sufentanil and tramadol.
Burrelli, R; Cafiero, T; Latina, P; Mastronardi, P,
)
1.07
"Sufentanil (S) is a very potent opioid with high micro-receptor affinity, a much wider therapeutic index and a lower fractional receptor occupancy."( Analgesic transition after remifentanil-based anesthesia in neurosurgery. A comparison of sufentanil and tramadol.
Burrelli, R; Cafiero, T; Latina, P; Mastronardi, P,
)
1.07
"Sufentanil is a widely used opioid agent, but its optimal dosage has not yet been defined."( Epidural analgesia in abdominal surgery: 0.2% ropivacaine with sufentanil.
Adducci, E; Beccia, G; De Cosmo, G; Fiorenti, M; Primieri, P, 2004
)
1.28
"Sufentanil is a powerful central anesthetic and analgesic of the opiate family that can be used with levobupivacaine for epidural administration. "( Stability of sufentanil citrate with levobupivacaine HCl in NaCl 0.9% infusion after microwave freeze-thaw treatment.
Boitquin, LP; Galanti, LM; Hecq, JD; Jamart, J; Vanbeckbergen, DF, 2004
)
2.14
"Sufentanil is a potent opioid that occasionally has been associated with hypotension. "( Vasodilation from sufentanil in humans.
Arain, SR; Ebert, TJ; Ficke, DJ; Holtz, MN; Shankar, H, 2005
)
2.1
"Sufentanil is a potent opioid analgesic frequently used in clinical anaesthesia. "( Different small-dose sufentanil blunting cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and intubation in children: a randomized, double-blind comparison.
Liao, X; Liu, HP; Liu, JH; Liu, Y; Luo, MP; Xu, YC; Xue, FS; Yang, QY; Zhang, YM, 2008
)
2.11
"Sufentanil is a new synthetic opiate analgesic that is 4520 times more potent than morphine in animal experiments. "( Cardiovascular effects of sufentanil anesthesia.
Bovil, JG; Sebel, PS, 1982
)
2.01
"Sufentanil citrate is a potent analogue of fentanyl that has been evaluated primarily for use in opioid anesthesia. "( Sufentanil citrate: a new opioid analgesic for use in anesthesia.
Rosow, CE,
)
3.02
"Sufentanil appears to be a suitable agent to provide analgesia/sedation in the neonatal patient under the experimental conditions of this study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)"( Safety and efficacy of sufentanil therapy in the ventilated infant.
Erenberg, A; Leff, RD; Seguin, JH, 1994
)
1.32
"Sufentanil is a potent analgesic with a very high receptor affinity and specificity, high lipid solubility, marked protein binding, and a shorter elimination half-life than fentanyl."( [Sufentanil. An alternative to fentanyl/alfentanil?].
Ellmauer, S, 1994
)
1.92
"Sufentanil is an intravenous opioid often used as a component of anesthesia during neurosurgical procedures. "( Sufentanil increases intracranial pressure in patients with head trauma.
Albanese, J; Alliez, B; Durbec, O; Martin, C; Potie, F; Viviand, X, 1993
)
3.17
"Sufentanil is a new opioid that is also of the phenylpiperidone group and has been recently licensed and introduced in Germany."( [A comparative study of intravenous opioid analgesia. Sufentanil and alfentanil for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in urologic patients].
Feller, S; Heide, C; Mörstedt, K; Nyga, B; Peter, K; Riegler, N; Sachs, M; Stoschek, M; Weninger, E, 1996
)
1.26
"Sufentanil is a highly lipid soluble opioid that provides potent analgesia when administered in the subarachnoid space. "( The effect of prior dural puncture on cerebrospinal fluid sufentanil concentrations in sheep after the administration of epidural sufentanil.
Lee, TH; McJames, S; Swenson, JD, 1998
)
1.99
"Sufentanil is a synthetic mu-opioid receptor agonist frequently used in anesthesia and critically ill patients. "( The opiate sufentanil alters the inflammatory, endocrine, and metabolic responses to endotoxin in dogs.
Ackermans, MT; Endert, E; Moeniralam, HS; Romijn, JA; Sauerwein, HP; Van Lanschot, JJ, 1998
)
2.13
"Sufentanil is a potent but short-acting spinal analgesic used to manage perioperative pain. "( Transdermal nitroglycerine enhances spinal sufentanil postoperative analgesia following orthopedic surgery.
de Oliveira, R; Lauretti, GR; Mattos, AL; Pereira, NL; Reis, MP, 1999
)
2.01

Effects

Sufentanil has a good protective effect on myocardial and liver injury caused by ischemia reperfusion (IR), but its effect on kidney is still unclear. SufentanIL has a synergistic effect on the clinically observed hypnotic properties of propofol.

Sufentanil has favourable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties as an opioid. It is usually co-administered with propofol as intravenous anaesthesia for hysteroscopic examination or therapeutic surgery.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Sufentanil has a significant protective activity on myocardial I/R injury in rats, the mechanism of which may be associated with the inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress."( Protective Effect of Sufentanil on Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rats by Inhibiting Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress.
Hou, Z; Lin, J; Qiu, L; Sun, L; Zhong, G, 2022
)
2.48
"Sufentanil has a good protective effect on myocardial and liver injury caused by ischemia reperfusion (IR), but its protective effect on kidney is still unclear. "( Sufentanil promotes autophagy and improves ischemia
Li, J; Li, L; Li, R; Lu, Y; Piao, Z, 2022
)
3.61
"Sufentanil has a synergistic effect on the clinically observed hypnotic properties of propofol. "( Investigating propofol-sufentanil interaction using clinical endpoints and processed electroencephalography: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Prasser, C; Weber, F, 2019
)
2.27
"Sufentanil has a protective effect against liver injury by reducing inflammatory response."( Sufentanil Preconditioning Protects Against Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury by Suppressing Inflammation.
Fang, J; Jiang, HF; Lian, YH; Xie, KJ; Zhou, HD, 2019
)
2.68
"Sufentanil has a significant protective activity on myocardial I/R injury in rats, the mechanism of which may be associated with the inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress."( Protective Effect of Sufentanil on Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rats by Inhibiting Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress.
Hou, Z; Lin, J; Qiu, L; Sun, L; Zhong, G, 2022
)
2.48
"Sufentanil has a good protective effect on myocardial and liver injury caused by ischemia reperfusion (IR), but its protective effect on kidney is still unclear. "( Sufentanil promotes autophagy and improves ischemia
Li, J; Li, L; Li, R; Lu, Y; Piao, Z, 2022
)
3.61
"Sufentanil has protective effects on IRI-induced organ injury."( Sufentanil inhibits Pin1 to attenuate renal tubular epithelial cell ischemia-reperfusion injury by activating the PI3K/AKT/FOXO1 pathway.
Liu, C; Niu, L; Wang, Q, 2023
)
3.07
"Sufentanil has been widely used to inhibit the hemodynamic responses caused by tracheal intubation. "( Intravenous Lidocaine Decreased the Median Effective Concentration of Sufentanil for Tracheal Intubation in Obese Patients.
He, C; Jia, D; Tu, F; Yuan, X, 2023
)
2.59
"Sufentanil has a synergistic effect on the clinically observed hypnotic properties of propofol. "( Investigating propofol-sufentanil interaction using clinical endpoints and processed electroencephalography: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Prasser, C; Weber, F, 2019
)
2.27
"Sufentanil has been widely used in epidural PCA, while its use in intravenous PCA has rarely been reported. "( Dose determination of sufentanil for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with background infusion in abdominal surgeries: A random study.
Gao, X; Lei, X; Li, X; Wei, H; Zhen, L, 2018
)
2.24
"Sufentanil has a protective effect against liver injury by reducing inflammatory response."( Sufentanil Preconditioning Protects Against Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury by Suppressing Inflammation.
Fang, J; Jiang, HF; Lian, YH; Xie, KJ; Zhou, HD, 2019
)
2.68
"Sufentanil has favourable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties as an opioid, and it is usually co-administered with propofol as intravenous anaesthesia for hysteroscopic examination or therapeutic surgery. "( ED50 of propofol in combination with low-dose sufentanil for intravenous anaesthesia in hysteroscopy.
Chen, H; Li, Y; Liu, C; Song, Y; Xiang, B; Yu, J, 2019
)
2.21
"Sufentanil has less physiological interference and lower incidence of adverse reactions for ICU patients."( [A multicenter randomized controlled trial of sufentanil for analgesia/sedation in patients in intensive care unit].
Chang, Y; Fu, Y; Hu, Y; Jiao, X; Li, B; Liu, X; Lu, Y; Mao, Z; Qin, B; Sun, L; Sun, R; Yang, H; Zhang, Z, 2014
)
1.38
"Sufentanil has been reported to provide stable hemodynamics similar to other opioids. "( Sufentanil preserves hemodynamics and left ventricular function in patients with ischemic heart disease.
Bhavsar, R; Folkersen, L; Greisen, JR; Jakobsen, CJ; Sloth, E, 2011
)
3.25
"Sufentanil has not yet been registered for epidural analgesia in Germany, in contrast to other countries."( [Obstetric peridural anesthesia with sufentanil. Is it contraindicated?].
Kick, O; Van Aken, H; Weissauer, W, 1994
)
1.28
"Sufentanil-lorazepam has no clinically significant effect on the electrophysiologic expression of the accessory pathway. "( The electrophysiologic effects of volatile anesthetics and sufentanil on the normal atrioventricular conduction system and accessory pathways in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.
Dobkowski, WB; Guiraudon, G; Klein, G; Murkin, JM; Sharpe, MD; Yee, R, 1994
)
1.97
"Sufentanil has been reported to increase cerebral blood flow in comparison with fentanyl. "( Effects of fentanyl versus sufentanil in equianesthetic doses on middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity.
Dodson, BA; Rampil, IJ; Trindle, MR, 1993
)
2.03
"Sufentanil has so far seldom been used for intravenous postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and the resulting serum concentrations have not yet been determined. "( Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with sufentanil: analgesic efficacy and minimum effective concentrations.
Gerhard, A; Grond, S; Horrichs-Haermeyer, G; Lehmann, KA; Zech, D, 1991
)
1.98

Actions

Sufentanil did not increase the inhibitory effect of ropivacaine on the growth of S. The sufentanIL group had a lower mean (SD) visual analogue pain score than the remifent anil group. SufentAnil may also enhance the potency differences between bupivACaine and the two S-enantiomer agents.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The sufentanil group had a lower mean (SD) visual analogue pain score than the remifentanil group; 1.5 (1.2) vs."( A comparison of sufentanil vs. remifentanil in fast-track cardiac surgery patients.
Borger, MA; Ender, JK; Flo Forner, A; Turton, EW; von Aspern, K; Zakhary, WZA, 2019
)
1.34
"Sufentanil did not increase the inhibitory effect of ropivacaine on the growth of S."( Sufentanil modifies the antibacterial activity of bupivacaine and ropivacaine.
Bonnaure-Mallet, M; Robert, JC; Shacoori, V; Tamanai-Shacoori, Z; Vo Van, JM, 2004
)
2.49
"Sufentanil may also enhance the potency differences between bupivacaine and the two S-enantiomer agents."( Effect of sufentanil on minimum local analgesic concentrations of epidural bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in nullipara in early labour.
Buyse, I; Columb, M; Stockman, W; Van de Velde, M; Vandermeersch, E, 2007
)
1.46

Treatment

Sufentanil inhibited BC cell proliferation, invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), immune response, but induced apoptosis. RANKL (NF-κB receptor agonist) abrogated the effects induced by sufent anil. SufentAnil was ineffective in preventing against ischaemia/reperfusion in diabetic rats.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Sufentanil treatment inhibited BC cell proliferation, invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), immune response, but induced apoptosis.Sufentanil suppressed the activation of the NF-κB pathway.RANKL (NF-κB receptor agonist) abrogated the effects induced by sufentanil.Sufentanil inhibited tumor growth, proliferation, immune response and promoted apoptosis via the NF-κB pathway."( Sufentanil inhibits the metastasis and immune response of breast cancer via mediating the NF-κB pathway.
Gu, J; Gu, K; Kong, Q; Li, M; Wang, G, 2023
)
3.8
"Sufentanil treatment markedly reduced pathological changes in lung tissue, pulmonary edema and secretion of inflammatory factors associated with ALI "(
Chang, N; Gao, Q; Liu, D, 2021
)
2.06
"Sufentanil pretreatment of the rats subjected to WIRS significantly alleviated the gastric mucosal injury, lowered the UI, and reduced ASIC3 mRNA expression in thoracic DRG neurons."( [Protective effects of sufentanil pretreatment against acute gastric mucosal lesion in rats and its relationship with acid-sensing ion channels].
Jiang, Q; Tu, WF, 2010
)
1.39
"Sufentanil treatment was ineffective in preventing against ischaemia/reperfusion in diabetic rats, which is associated with the activation of GSK-3β. "( Diabetes mellitus abrogates the cardioprotection of sufentanil against ischaemia/reperfusion injury by altering glycogen synthase kinase-3β.
Cao, YY; Chen, QL; Fang, WP; Gu, EW; Zhang, L; Zhu, Y, 2013
)
2.08
"Pretreatment with sufentanil induced a sustained increase in pain sensitivity with a delayed return to baseline values characterizing an OIH in carrageenan-injected mice only."( Role of kinin B2 receptors in opioid-induced hyperalgesia in inflammatory pain in mice.
Bader, M; Bedel, J; Etcheverry, J; Fourcade, O; Frances, B; Girolami, JP; Grastilleur, S; Minville, V; Mouledous, L, 2013
)
0.71
"Pretreatment with sufentanil (1 microgram/kg, i.p.) induced an elevation in apomorphine-induced stereotyped behaviour, but attenuated locomotor activity."( Increased dopamine receptor sensitivity in the rat following acute administration of sufentanil, U50,488H and D-Ala2-D-Leu5-enkephalin.
Armstrong, RA; Rooney, KF; Sewell, RD, 1991
)
0.83

Toxicity

Sufentanil combined with ropivacaine is commonly used for epidural labor analgesia, but it may cause some adverse effects. We investigated analgesia and the adverse effects of epidural sufent anil infusion in a double-blind randomized study of 37 patients undergoing thoracic surgery.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" FHR changes occurred in 15% of cases but were not associated with adverse neonatal outcome."( Intrathecal sufentanil for labor analgesia--sensory changes, side effects, and fetal heart rate changes.
Cherry, CM; Cohen, SE; el-Sayed, YY; Gibson, RN; Holbrook, RH; Jaffe, RA, 1993
)
0.66
"We investigated analgesia and the adverse effects of epidural sufentanil infusion in a double-blind randomized study of 37 patients undergoing thoracic surgery."( The analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of continuous epidural sufentanil and bupivacaine infusion after thoracotomy.
Bake, B; Hansdóttir, V; Nordberg, G, 1996
)
0.77
"To assess the effect of opioid substitution (substituting one member of the opioid class for another) on the incidence and severity of adverse effects in palliative care patients who experience unacceptable, refractory adverse effects when taking an opioid drug."( Opioid substitution to reduce adverse effects in cancer pain management.
Ashby, MA; Jackson, KA; Martin, P, 1999
)
0.3
" 49 substitutions were for adverse effects."( Opioid substitution to reduce adverse effects in cancer pain management.
Ashby, MA; Jackson, KA; Martin, P, 1999
)
0.3
"We found that the incidence and severity of adverse effects differed between opioids in the same patient."( Opioid substitution to reduce adverse effects in cancer pain management.
Ashby, MA; Jackson, KA; Martin, P, 1999
)
0.3
"This review of 6,002 CSE blocks performed in a community hospital has demonstrated that CSE labor analgesia, surgical anesthesia are safe and efficacious."( The safety and efficacy of combined spinal and epidural analgesia/anesthesia (6,002 blocks) in a community hospital.
Albright, GA; Forster, RM,
)
0.13
"To determine the adverse event and complication rate for the use of procedural sedation and analgesia for painful procedures and diagnostic imaging studies performed in a pediatric emergency department."( Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department.
Krauss, B; Peña, BM, 1999
)
0.3
" Adverse events and complications were recorded."( Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department.
Krauss, B; Peña, BM, 1999
)
0.3
"3%) experienced adverse events, which included oxygen desaturation less than 90% requiring intervention (10 patients) [supplemental oxygen (9), bag-mask ventilation (1)], paradoxical reactions (7), emesis (3), paradoxical reaction and oxygen desaturation requiring supplemental oxygen (2), apnea requiring bag-mask ventilation (1), laryngospasm requiring bag-mask ventilation (1), bradycardia (1), stridor and emesis (1) and oxygen desaturation requiring bag-mask ventilation with subsequent emesis (1)."( Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department.
Krauss, B; Peña, BM, 1999
)
0.3
" The main side effect was pruritus."( Combined spinal epidural for labour analgesia--duration, efficacy and side effects of adding sufentanil or fentanyl to bupivacaine intrathecally vs plain bupivacaine.
Chen, LH; Chong, JL; Lo, WK, 1999
)
0.52
" The addition of epinephrine improves the side effect profile of this technique while prolonging the duration of analgesia."( Epinephrine reduces the sedative side effects of epidural sufentanil for labour analgesia.
Armstrong, KP; Butler, R; Kennedy, B; Morley-Forster, PK; Watson, JT; Yee, I, 2002
)
0.56
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
" The incidence of adverse events was comparable in both groups."( Fast-track cardiac anesthesia: efficacy and safety of remifentanil versus sufentanil.
Conzen, P; Lison, S; Schill, M, 2007
)
0.57
"Remifentanil for fast-track cardiac anesthesia provided safe and stable operating conditions and facilitated earlier tracheal extubation."( Fast-track cardiac anesthesia: efficacy and safety of remifentanil versus sufentanil.
Conzen, P; Lison, S; Schill, M, 2007
)
0.57
"The Leipzig fast-track protocol for cardio-anesthesia including the central elements of switching opiate therapy to remifentanil and switching patient recovery to a special post-anesthesia recovery and care unit, shortened therapy times, is safe and economically effective."( [Leipzig fast-track protocol for cardio-anesthesia. Effective, safe and economical].
Ender, J; Fassl, J; Funkat, AK; Häntschel, D; Scholz, M; Sommer, M; Wittmann, M, 2009
)
0.35
" However, during cesarean section with neuraxial block, S-Ketamine might have adverse effects on the interaction between mothers and infants, including breastfeeding."( A study of low-dose S-ketamine infusion as "preventive" pain treatment for cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: benefits and side effects.
Catarci, S; Draisci, G; Suppa, E; Valente, A; Zanfini, BA, 2012
)
0.38
" All side effects were rated as light and there were no serious adverse events."( A study of low-dose S-ketamine infusion as "preventive" pain treatment for cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: benefits and side effects.
Catarci, S; Draisci, G; Suppa, E; Valente, A; Zanfini, BA, 2012
)
0.38
"Preventive administration of S-Ketamine via 12-hour infusion was safe and may have anti-hyperalgesic action after cesarean section."( A study of low-dose S-ketamine infusion as "preventive" pain treatment for cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: benefits and side effects.
Catarci, S; Draisci, G; Suppa, E; Valente, A; Zanfini, BA, 2012
)
0.38
"2 min) when injected at the same dose (1 μg kg(-1)), prolonging the duration of analgesia after intramuscular administration and representing an alternative on the development of effective and safe drug-delivery system for opioid analgesics."( Sufentanil-2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex for pain treatment: physicochemical, cytotoxicity, and pharmacological evaluation.
Braga, AF; Cereda, CM; De Araujo, DR; De Paula, E; Fraceto, LF; Franco, MK; Moraes, CM; Nunes, LA; Tófoli, GR; Volobuef, C; Yokaichiya, F, 2012
)
1.82
" All doses of sublingual sufentanil were well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse events was similar between the sublingual sufentanil and placebo groups."( Pharmacokinetics of sublingual sufentanil tablets and efficacy and safety in the management of postoperative pain.
Chiang, YK; Evashenk, MA; Hamel, LG; Hwang, SS; Minkowitz, HS; Palmer, PP; Singla, NK,
)
0.72
"Labor analgesia by patient-controlled lumbar epidural combined anesthesia accompanied with Doula with ropivacaine and sufentanil is effective, safe, reliable, has no adverse effects, and reduces cesarean section rate."( Investigation on delivery analgesia effect of combined spinal epidural anesthesia plus Doula and safety of mother and baby.
Feng, BB; Wang, L; Zhai, JJ, 2013
)
0.6
" Proper management of the untoward effects of this method may introduce it as a safe and low-cost method for painless labor."( Efficacy and Safety of Sufentanil and Pethidine in Spinal Anesthesia for Painless Labor.
Bagheri, B; Farzanegan, B; Fathi, M; Salarian, S, 2015
)
0.73
"To test the safe clinical application of sufentanil as topical ophthalmic drops by examining treated rabbit eyes for ophthalmic irritation signs or short-time toxic reactions."( Short-term ocular toxicity and eye irritation tests following application of sufentanil in rabbits.
Chen, H; Chen, Z; Xu, Y, 2014
)
0.9
" Corneal endothelial counts were performed and toxic reactions were evaluated."( Short-term ocular toxicity and eye irritation tests following application of sufentanil in rabbits.
Chen, H; Chen, Z; Xu, Y, 2014
)
0.63
"Single ocular administration of sufentanil at a dose of 5-10 μg in rabbits yields no ocular irritation or toxic responses at 14 or 30 d following eye drop delivery."( Short-term ocular toxicity and eye irritation tests following application of sufentanil in rabbits.
Chen, H; Chen, Z; Xu, Y, 2014
)
0.91
"Objective To compare the analgesic effect and incidences of adverse events of different sufentanil concentration regimens in postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia(PCA)."( Effect of Different Sufentanil Concentration Regimens on Postoperative Pain Control and Its Adverse Events in Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia.
Huang, Y; Ren, L; Sang, N; Xu, J, 2017
)
1
" No severe adverse effects associated with continuous wound infiltration were observed during the study period."( Efficacy and Safety of a Continuous Wound Catheter in Open Abdominal Partial Hepatectomy.
Che, L; Lu, X; Pei, LJ, 2017
)
0.46
" The secondary endpoints were the incidence of opioid-related adverse effects, recovery results and patient satisfaction after surgery."( Prospective investigation of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with hydromorphone or sufentanil: impact on mood, opioid adverse effects, and recovery.
Cheng, L; Feng, Z; Li, H; Peng, Z; Wu, J; Xu, X; Yang, Y; Ye, S; Zhu, L, 2018
)
0.7
" The secondary outcomes were heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and adverse reactions."( Efficacy and Safety of Sufentanil-Propofol Versus Remifentanil-Propofol as Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy: A Meta-Analysis.
Lu, S; Peng, G; Wang, JM; Xu, F, 2018
)
0.79
" Moreover, there were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions between the 2 groups."( Efficacy and Safety of Sufentanil-Propofol Versus Remifentanil-Propofol as Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy: A Meta-Analysis.
Lu, S; Peng, G; Wang, JM; Xu, F, 2018
)
0.79
" There was no difference in adverse events except for dizziness (RR=1."( Efficacy and safety of sufentanil sublingual tablet system in postoperative pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Singh, S; Tamilselvan, T; Thangaraju, P; Varthya, SB; Venkatesan, S, 2023
)
1.22
" This study aimed to determine whether intrathecal fentanyl or sufentanil offers safety in mortality and perioperative adverse events."( Safety and effectiveness of adding fentanyl or sufentanil to spinal anesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Azi, LMTA; de Ávila Oliveira, R; Fonseca, NM; Guimarães, GMN; Pontes, JPJ,
)
0.63
"Infiltration of ropivacaine and Diprospan can achieve satisfactory postoperative pain relief after craniotomy; it is a simple, easy, and safe technique, worth clinical promotion."( Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Ropivacaine Plus Diprospan for Preemptive Scalp Infiltration in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Han, X; Ji, N; Luo, F; Ren, T; Wang, Y, 2022
)
0.72
"Sufentanil combined with ropivacaine is commonly used for epidural labor analgesia, but it may cause some adverse effects."( Efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine versus sufentanil-ropivacaine for epidural labor analgesia: a randomized controlled trial.
Cao, R; Fan, M; Hu, L; Li, J; Lu, S, 2022
)
2.41
" Secondary outcomes included the duration of labor stages and adverse reactions of parturient women and newborns."( Efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine versus sufentanil-ropivacaine for epidural labor analgesia: a randomized controlled trial.
Cao, R; Fan, M; Hu, L; Li, J; Lu, S, 2022
)
0.97
" The incidence of adverse reactions in parturient women and newborns was low in both groups."( Efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine versus sufentanil-ropivacaine for epidural labor analgesia: a randomized controlled trial.
Cao, R; Fan, M; Hu, L; Li, J; Lu, S, 2022
)
0.97
" Twenty-six patients had mild adverse events including nausea (6."( Safety and efficacy of microwave ablation to treat pulmonary nodules under conscious analgosedation with sufentanil: A single-center clinical experience.
Cao, P; Kong, Y; Li, Z; Meng, W; Wang, N; Wei, Z; Xue, G; Ye, X, 2022
)
0.94
" Previous studies present conflicting results in analgesia satisfactory and adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of epidural anesthesia versus local anesthesia in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guo, C; Hong, Y; Jin, L; Liu, C; Liu, H; Xu, S; Zheng, B, 2022
)
0.72
" Secondary outcomes: adverse events, surgery exit, bleed volume, X-ray radiation."( Efficacy and safety of epidural anesthesia versus local anesthesia in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guo, C; Hong, Y; Jin, L; Liu, C; Liu, H; Xu, S; Zheng, B, 2022
)
0.72
"00001), adverse events (OR =0."( Efficacy and safety of epidural anesthesia versus local anesthesia in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guo, C; Hong, Y; Jin, L; Liu, C; Liu, H; Xu, S; Zheng, B, 2022
)
0.72
"EA is an effective and safe anesthesia method for PTED and might achieve better clinical results than LA."( Efficacy and safety of epidural anesthesia versus local anesthesia in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guo, C; Hong, Y; Jin, L; Liu, C; Liu, H; Xu, S; Zheng, B, 2022
)
0.72
"The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative analgesia effectiveness and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)-related adverse events."( Effectiveness of Sufentanil-Based Patient-Controlled Analgesia Regimen in Children and Incidence of Adverse Events Following Major Congenital Structure Repairs.
Liu, F; Xie, D; Zuo, Y, 2023
)
1.25
" The secondary endpoints included hemodynamics, the duration of induction, the duration of insertion, tidal volume, plateau pressure and adverse events."( Feasibility and Safety of Remazolam versus Propofol When Inserting Laryngeal Masks Without Muscle Relaxants During Hysteroscopy.
Chen, R; Lu, J; Mei, S; Meng, QT; Tang, S; Wei, L; Xu, C, 2023
)
0.91
" Using the lowest possible dose of anesthetic that provides painless delivery with the lowest adverse events is a major concern."( Safety and efficacy of combined ropivacaine and sufentanil compared with ropivacaine for cesarean sections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Abdalla, AM; Albadrani, MS; Azeem, FM; El-Amin, EI; Elhusein, AM; Elhussain, MY; Fadlalmola, HA; Masada, HK, 2023
)
1.17
" Efficacy indicators consisting of maternal vital signs, obstetric transfer, neonatal prognostic indicators, and adverse effects were recorded before and after analgesia across groups."( Cytochrome P4503A4 gene polymorphisms guide safe sufentanil analgesic doses in pregnant Chinese mothers: a multicenter, randomized, prospective study.
Chi, L; Shu, X; Yan, Y; Yu, J, 2024
)
1.7

Pharmacokinetics

The pharmacokinetic profiles of sufentanil available in the literature are conflicting because of methodologic differences. A simulation of the sufENTanil plasma concentrations was achieved. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from zero to 1h, 2h, 3h, tracheal extubation and infinity, the absorption and distribution half-lives, maximum plasma and CSF concentrations, time to the peak concentration of sufentanil, and the fraction of sufentanil that reached the central circulation after epidural administration were assessed."( Comparative absorption and distribution pharmacokinetics of intravenous and epidural sufentanil for major abdominal surgery.
Ionescu, TI; Nuyten, ST; Taverne, RH, 1992
)
0.69
"The pharmacokinetic variables of sufentanil were studied in 20 healthy children between two and eight years of age."( Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in normal children.
Gaudreault, P; Goulet, B; Guay, J; Tang, A; Varin, F, 1992
)
0.89
" The resulting data for the pharmacodynamic parameters of sufentanil were compared with fentanyl parameters that were obtained by reanalysis from an identically conducted, previously published study."( Electroencephalographic quantitation of opioid effect: comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and sufentanil.
Cooke, JE; Scott, JC; Stanski, DR, 1991
)
0.74
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived by noncompartmental analysis."( The CSF and plasma pharmacokinetics of sufentanil after intrathecal administration.
Hansdottir, V; Hedner, T; Nordberg, G; Woestenborghs, R, 1991
)
0.55
"Fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil have important pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences."( Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and rational opioid selection.
Shafer, SL; Varvel, JR, 1991
)
0.58
"The pharmacokinetic and the effects of sufentanil (S) and fentanyl (F) on cardiovascular stability, brain swelling, respiratory depression and post operative status were studied in 30 neurosurgical patients (group S, n = 15; group F, n = 15)."( [Clinical and pharmacokinetic comparative study of sufentanil and fentanyl in supratentorial neurosurgery].
Artru, F; Chacornac, R; Charlot, M; Levron, JC; Wasylkiewicz, Y, 1991
)
0.8
" Pharmacokinetic variables were calculated from the derived compartmental models."( Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in the elderly surgical patient.
Chang, WJ; Matteo, RS; Ornstein, E; Schwartz, AE; Young, WL, 1990
)
0.6
" A three-compartment pharmacokinetic model was fit to the concentration versus time data."( Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery.
Bergstrom, RG; Hudson, RJ; Rosenbloom, M; Sabourin, MA; Strunin, L; Thomson, IR, 1989
)
0.6
" Plasma sufentanil concentrations were best fitted to a bi-exponential curve and the pharmacokinetic variables calculated using a curve stripping program (STRIPE)."( Sufentanil pharmacokinetics in neurosurgical patients.
Bansinath, M; Brous, P; Canter, M; Puig, MM; Scoles, J; Turndorf, H, 1989
)
2.15
"The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of high-dose sufentanil (15 micrograms/kg) and oxygen were determined in 20 infants and children undergoing repair of congenital heart defects."( Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of high-dose sufentanil in infants and children undergoing cardiac surgery.
Cook, DR; Davin-Robinson, KA; Davis, PJ; Stiller, RL, 1987
)
0.77
" The elimination half-life (T1/2 beta) was 783 +/- 346 min in neonates, significantly longer than the values of 214 +/- 41, 140 +/- 30, and 209 +/- 23 min observed in infants, children, and adolescents, respectively."( Sufentanil pharmacokinetics in pediatric cardiovascular patients.
Davis, DP; de Bruijn, NP; Greeley, WJ, 1987
)
1.72
" The effects of chronic renal failure (CRF) on the pharmacokinetic profile of sufentanil were evaluated in six adolescent patients undergoing renal transplantation, and these findings were compared with data from age-matched control patients with normal renal function who were undergoing other surgical procedures."( Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in adolescent patients with chronic renal failure.
Brandom, BW; Cook, DR; Davin-Robinson, KA; Davis, PJ; Stiller, RL, 1988
)
0.83
" These changes, in turn, may result in pharmacokinetic alterations in affected patients."( Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in patients undergoing renal transplantation.
Avitable, M; Butt, K; Casthely, PA; Fyman, PN; Moser, F; Reynolds, JR, 1988
)
0.6
" For both analgesics, the pharmacokinetic profile in man could be described by a three-compartment model."( Radioimmunoassay of the new opiate analgesics alfentanil and sufentanil. Preliminary pharmacokinetic profile in man.
Hendriks, R; Heykants, J; Michiels, M, 1983
)
0.51
" Recent developments in analytical techniques have allowed pharmacokinetic studies and these have confirmed this opinion; fentanyl is rightly regarded as having a redistribution-limited duration of action after single or infrequent doses (analogous to thiopentone)."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of fentanyl and its newer derivatives.
Mather, LE,
)
0.13
" The average terminal elimination (beta) half-life was 164 +/- 22 min."( The pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in surgical patients.
Blackburn, CL; Bovill, JG; Heykants, JJ; Oei-Lim, V; Sebel, PS, 1984
)
0.57
" Median (range) values of pharmacokinetic parameters for sufentanil were: t1/2,z = 16 (7-49) h; CL = 1215 (519-2550) ml min-1; CLR = 7 (2-38) ml min-1; Vss = 10."( Pharmacokinetics and effects on intracranial pressure of sufentanil in head trauma patients.
Bause, H; Klotz, U; Krishna, DR; Pohl, S; Scholz, J; Schulte am Esch, J; Schulz, M, 1994
)
0.78
" In plasma, the area under the concentration curve (AUC) did not differ between the groups."( The cerebrospinal fluid and plasma pharmacokinetics of sufentanil after thoracic or lumbar epidural administration.
Hansdottir, V; Nordberg, G; Woestenborghs, R, 1995
)
0.54
" We investigated the role of each of these primary pharmacokinetic parameters to determine values of each that would contribute to rapid recovery after various dosing schemes."( Pharmacokinetic parameters relevant to recovery from opioids.
Shafer, SL; Youngs, EJ, 1994
)
0.29
" Set I predicted the change in plasma concentration of each drug after a bolus if each pharmacokinetic parameter were independently increased by 5%."( Pharmacokinetic parameters relevant to recovery from opioids.
Shafer, SL; Youngs, EJ, 1994
)
0.29
"This study proposes qualitative guidelines for pharmacokinetic properties desirable in anesthetic drugs."( Pharmacokinetic parameters relevant to recovery from opioids.
Shafer, SL; Youngs, EJ, 1994
)
0.29
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the derived compartmental models."( Sufentanil pharmacokinetics in young adult and elderly surgical patients.
Helmers, JH; van Leeuwen, L; Zuurmond, WW, 1994
)
1.73
"5 h Tmax was observed."( In vivo iontophoresis of fentanyl and sufentanil in rats: pharmacokinetics and acute antinociceptive effects.
Préat, V; Thysman, S, 1993
)
0.56
" The overall mean elimination half-life was 182 min, Vdss 169 l and the plasma clearance 910 ml min-1."( Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in general surgical patients under different conditions of anaesthesia.
Gasparini, R; Lehmann, KA; Sipakis, K; van Peer, A, 1993
)
0.61
"The pharmacokinetic profiles of sufentanil available in the literature are conflicting because of methodologic differences."( Linearity of pharmacokinetics and model estimation of sufentanil.
Camu, F; Gepts, E; Heykants, JJ; Shafer, SL; Stanski, DR; Van Peer, A; Woestenborghs, R, 1995
)
0.82
" The data were analyzed with the standard two-stage, naive pooled-data and the mixed effect pharmacokinetic approaches."( Linearity of pharmacokinetics and model estimation of sufentanil.
Camu, F; Gepts, E; Heykants, JJ; Shafer, SL; Stanski, DR; Van Peer, A; Woestenborghs, R, 1995
)
0.54
"min-1), and elimination half-life = 769 min (690-1011 min)."( Linearity of pharmacokinetics and model estimation of sufentanil.
Camu, F; Gepts, E; Heykants, JJ; Shafer, SL; Stanski, DR; Van Peer, A; Woestenborghs, R, 1995
)
0.54
" Important pharmacokinetic differences between alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil have been shown in many reports."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil. An update.
Scholz, J; Schulz, M; Steinfath, M, 1996
)
0.77
"The performance of 10 pharmacokinetic models in predicting blood propofol concentrations was evaluated in patients during neurosurgical anesthesia."( Predictive accuracy of continuous propofol infusions in neurosurgical patients: comparison of pharmacokinetic models.
Cantraine, F; Coussaert, E; d'Hollander, A; Dewandre, PY; Hans, P; Lamy, M; Pieron, F, 1997
)
0.3
"5 Hz frequency band of the electroencephalogram (EEG) was used as pharmacodynamic endpoint."( Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the electroencephalogram effect of synthetic opioids in the rat: correlation with the interaction at the mu-opioid receptor.
Cox, EH; Danhof, M; Kerbusch, T; Van der Graaf, PH, 1998
)
0.3
"To compare the pharmacokinetic behaviour of doxacurium in patients undergoing normothermic or hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for coronary artery bypass graft surgery."( Pharmacokinetics of doxacurium during normothermic and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.
Asokumar, B; Cheng, D; Chung, F; Peniston, C; Sandler, A; Varin, F, 1998
)
0.3
" Timed blood and urine samples were collected and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a non-compartmental approach."( Pharmacokinetics of doxacurium during normothermic and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.
Asokumar, B; Cheng, D; Chung, F; Peniston, C; Sandler, A; Varin, F, 1998
)
0.3
"For the normothermic and hypothermic groups, terminal elimination half-life (t1/2 beta) was 100."( Pharmacokinetics of doxacurium during normothermic and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.
Asokumar, B; Cheng, D; Chung, F; Peniston, C; Sandler, A; Varin, F, 1998
)
0.3
" Using SAAM II pharmacokinetic modeling software (SAAM Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA), the data were fit to a 16-compartment model that was divided into four spinal levels, each of which consisted of a caternary arrangement of four compartments representing the spinal cord, cerebrospinal fluid, epidural space, and epidural fat."( Comparative spinal distribution and clearance kinetics of intrathecally administered morphine, fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil.
Arends, RH; Bernards, CM; Shen, DD; Ummenhofer, WC, 2000
)
0.51
"The four opioids studied demonstrate markedly different pharmacokinetic behavior, which correlates well with their pharmacodynamic behavior."( Comparative spinal distribution and clearance kinetics of intrathecally administered morphine, fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil.
Arends, RH; Bernards, CM; Shen, DD; Ummenhofer, WC, 2000
)
0.51
"The pharmacodynamic differences in time to onset and dissipation of effect of sufentanil, fentanyl, and alfentanil probably result from different rates of blood-brain equilibration."( Pharmacokinetics of human cerebral opioid extraction: a comparative study on sufentanil, fentanyl, and alfentanil in a patient after severe head injury.
Göbel, L; Gruber, M; Hoerauf, KH; Metz, C; Taeger, K, 2000
)
0.76
"To evaluate the prospective predictive accuracy and the quality of anesthesia of pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of sufentanil and midazolam designed to establish and maintain a plasma level of drug during cardiac surgery."( Pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of sufentanil and midazolam during cardiac surgery: assessment of the prospective predictive accuracy and the quality of anesthesia.
Barvais, L; Cantraine, F; Coussaert, E; d'Hollander, A; Heitz, D; Maes, V; Schmartz, D, 2000
)
0.78
"Pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of sufentanil and midazolam using the pharmacokinetic sets of Gepts et al and Maitre et al is a safe and accurate anesthetic technique before CPB in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery when high sufentanil (1 to 10 ng/mL) and low midazolam (100 ng/mL) predicted plasma concentrations are targeted."( Pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of sufentanil and midazolam during cardiac surgery: assessment of the prospective predictive accuracy and the quality of anesthesia.
Barvais, L; Cantraine, F; Coussaert, E; d'Hollander, A; Heitz, D; Maes, V; Schmartz, D, 2000
)
0.84
"The authors have determined a pharmacokinetic model for sufentanil that can be used to maintain desired target concentrations of sufentanil before cardiopulmonary bypass, with a high degree of accuracy and acceptable variability."( Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Henderson, BT; Hudson, RJ; Moon, M; Peterson, MD; Thomson, IR, 2001
)
0.88
"No pharmacokinetic data are available with respect to the plasma concentration of ketoprofen during intravenous infusion in children."( Pharmacokinetics of a 24-hour intravenous ketoprofen infusion in children.
Jekunen, A; Karvinen, M; Kokki, H, 2002
)
0.31
" To compare pharmacokinetic results, a simulation of the sufentanil plasma concentrations was achieved."( Pilot study on the effect of tourniquet use on sufentanil pharmacokinetics.
Ecoffey, C; Estebe, JP; Le Corre, P; Le Moing, JP; Le Naoures, A; Levron, JC, 2002
)
0.82
"Exsanguination and inflation of the pneumatic tourniquet had no significant effect on pharmacokinetic results."( Pilot study on the effect of tourniquet use on sufentanil pharmacokinetics.
Ecoffey, C; Estebe, JP; Le Corre, P; Le Moing, JP; Le Naoures, A; Levron, JC, 2002
)
0.57
"Plasma concentration-time profiles of sufentanil and pharmacokinetic parameters such as initial postinfusion half-life (t(1/2alpha)), elimination half-life (t(1/2beta)), total clearance (Cl), volume of distribution (Vdbeta), and time required to obtain a 50% decrease in plasma concentration (tcp(0/2))."( Pharmacokinetics of long-term sufentanil infusion for sedation in ICU patients.
Assoune, P; Boudaoud, S; Ethuin, F; Eurin, B; Jacob, L; Le Moing, JP; Leblanc, I; Levron, JC; Marie, O; Troje, C, 2003
)
0.88
"The pharmacokinetic analysis of sufentanil for ICU sedation revealed increased volume of distribution and elimination half-life."( Pharmacokinetics of long-term sufentanil infusion for sedation in ICU patients.
Assoune, P; Boudaoud, S; Ethuin, F; Eurin, B; Jacob, L; Le Moing, JP; Leblanc, I; Levron, JC; Marie, O; Troje, C, 2003
)
0.89
" This study evaluates pharmacokinetic characteristics related to the absorption of sufentanil using a prototype 60-day system."( Pharmacokinetics of an implanted osmotic pump delivering sufentanil for the treatment of chronic pain.
Fisher, DM; Kellett, N; Lenhardt, R, 2003
)
0.79
" Plasma was sampled and population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed to estimate in vivo release rate and absorption half-life."( Pharmacokinetics of an implanted osmotic pump delivering sufentanil for the treatment of chronic pain.
Fisher, DM; Kellett, N; Lenhardt, R, 2003
)
0.56
" Absorption half-life was 16."( Pharmacokinetics of an implanted osmotic pump delivering sufentanil for the treatment of chronic pain.
Fisher, DM; Kellett, N; Lenhardt, R, 2003
)
0.56
" A comparison is also presented between several methods based on animal pharmacokinetic data, using the same set of proprietary compounds, and it lends further support for the use of this method, as opposed to methods that require the gathering of pharmacokinetic data in laboratory animals."( Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
Gao, F; Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Shalaeva, MY, 2004
)
0.32
"Complete pharmacokinetic modeling, including assessment of the effect of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on sufentanil disposition, has not been reported."( Effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on sufentanil pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.
Hudson, RJ; Jassal, R; Thomson, IR, 2004
)
0.81
"Population pharmacokinetic modeling was applied to data from 21 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting."( Effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on sufentanil pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.
Hudson, RJ; Jassal, R; Thomson, IR, 2004
)
0.6
"When sufentanil is infused at a constant rate, with initiation of CPB, a pharmacokinetic model adjusted for CPB predicts that the sufentanil concentration will decrease approximately 17% and that it will begin to return to the prebypass concentration 12 min after initiation of CPB."( Effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on sufentanil pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.
Hudson, RJ; Jassal, R; Thomson, IR, 2004
)
1.11
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
"10 L/min, and elimination half-life (t(1/2) gamma)=271."( Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil administered by target-controlled infusion in Chinese surgical patients.
Duan, JL; Liu, W; Lu, W; Sheng, XY; Wu, XM; Xu, CY; Zhang, LP; Zhao, Y, 2009
)
0.68
"84 L/min and elimination half-life (t(1/2Y)) was 389 minutes."( Two-stage analysis of pharmacokinetics of sufentanil administered by target-controlled infusion in Chinese patients.
Duan, JL; Jia, DL; Jiang, JY; Liu, W; Lu, W; Meng, XL; Sheng, XY; Wang, J; Wu, XM; Xu, CY; Zhang, LP; Zhao, Y, 2009
)
0.62
" The pharmacokinetic analysis technique may affect the pharmacokinetic parameters and correlations."( Two-stage analysis of pharmacokinetics of sufentanil administered by target-controlled infusion in Chinese patients.
Duan, JL; Jia, DL; Jiang, JY; Liu, W; Lu, W; Meng, XL; Sheng, XY; Wang, J; Wu, XM; Xu, CY; Zhang, LP; Zhao, Y, 2009
)
0.62
" Method was applied to pharmacokinetic study in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting."( Determination of total and unbound sufentanil in human plasma by ultrafiltration and LC-MS/MS: application to clinical pharmacokinetic study.
Fechner, J; Ihmsen, H; Jeleazcov, C; Saari, TI; Schüttler, J, 2012
)
0.66
"Plasma monitoring and pharmacokinetic assessment are important tools used in therapeutic control."( Pharmacokinetic assessment of sufentanil in cardiac surgery.
Carmona, MJ; Dos Santos, MB; Manfio, JL; Santos, LM; Santos, SR, 2013
)
0.68
" Population pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling."( Population pharmacokinetic modeling of hydromorphone in cardiac surgery patients during postoperative pain therapy.
Fechner, J; Fröhlich, K; Ihmsen, H; Jeleazcov, C; Krajinovic, L; Mell, J; Saari, TI; Schüttler, J, 2014
)
0.4
"The final pharmacokinetic model gave a robust representation of hydromorphone pharmacokinetics."( Population pharmacokinetic modeling of hydromorphone in cardiac surgery patients during postoperative pain therapy.
Fechner, J; Fröhlich, K; Ihmsen, H; Jeleazcov, C; Krajinovic, L; Mell, J; Saari, TI; Schüttler, J, 2014
)
0.4
" The pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of sufentanil, administered by different routes of delivery and after single and repeated sublingual (SL) administration, were examined in 2 studies."( Pharmacokinetic properties of single- and repeated-dose sufentanil sublingual tablets in healthy volunteers.
Chiang, YK; Evashenk, MA; Hamel, LG; Hwang, SS; Palmer, PP; Willsie, SK, 2015
)
0.92
"In the route of administration study (n = 25), mean Cmax values were highest with IV administration, and bioavailability values were: SL, 59%; BU, 78%; and PO, 9%."( Pharmacokinetic properties of single- and repeated-dose sufentanil sublingual tablets in healthy volunteers.
Chiang, YK; Evashenk, MA; Hamel, LG; Hwang, SS; Palmer, PP; Willsie, SK, 2015
)
0.66
"The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of sufentanil and to assess the influence of covariates in critically ill children admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit."( Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil during long-term infusion in critically ill pediatric patients.
Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, A; Bienert, A; Borsuk, A; Grześkowiak, E; Kaliszan, R; Rosada-Kurasińska, J; Tibboel, D; Warzybok, J; Wiczling, P; Zielińska, M, 2016
)
0.99
" ke0 was estimated using t peak and known sufentanil pharmacokinetic parameters in normal children."( Estimation of the plasma effect site equilibration rate constant of sufentanil in children using the time to peak effect of heart rate and blood pressure.
Jung, S; Kim, HS; Kim, JT; Lee, JH; Song, IK,
)
0.63
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a one-compartment model."( Pharmacokinetics after a single dose of naloxone administered as a nasal spray in healthy volunteers.
Bondesson, U; Eksborg, S; Hellmundt, L; Lundeberg, S; Vanky, E, 2017
)
0.46
"The accuracy of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model prediction in children, especially those younger than 2 years old, has not been systematically evaluated."( Predictive Performance of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling of Drugs Extensively Metabolized by Major Cytochrome P450s in Children.
Al-Huniti, N; Bui, KH; Cheung, SYA; Johnson, TN; Li, J; Xu, H; Zhou, D; Zhou, W, 2018
)
0.48
" We conclude that sufentanil is suited for the transmucosal route due to its pharmacokinetic profile, including rapid onset, absence of active metabolites and low tissue accumulation."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sublingual sufentanil for postoperative pain management.
Dahan, A; Langford, R; van de Donk, T; Ward, S, 2018
)
1.07
"Allometric approaches are widely used for interspecies scaling for the prediction of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters during drug development."( Multistep Unified Models Using Prior Knowledge for the Prediction of Drug Clearance in Neonates and Infants.
Forshee, R; Jiang, Z; Mahmood, I; Tegenge, MA, 2018
)
0.48
" The pharmacokinetic characteristics of sublingually administered tablets containing 15 or 30 µg of sufentanil are described."( Pharmacokinetic Properties of a Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet Intended to Treat Acute Pain.
Chang, P; Dahan, A; Fisher, DM; Palmer, PP; Wada, DR, 2018
)
0.98
"The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of many drugs are altered as a consequence of the pathophysiological changes associated with critical illness."( Altered Pharmacokinetics in Prolonged Infusions of Sedatives and Analgesics Among Adult Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review.
Joynt, GM; Lee, A; Ling, L; Tse, AHW, 2018
)
0.48
" A few studies describe the pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in neonates; however, no pharmacokinetic data about sufentanil during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have been published yet."( Sufentanil pharmacokinetics in a full-term neonate treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case report.
Bašková, M; Pokorná, P; Posch, L; Šíma, M; Slanař, O; Vobruba, V, 2019
)
2.21
" Based on these measurements, individual sufentanil pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated."( Sufentanil pharmacokinetics in a full-term neonate treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case report.
Bašková, M; Pokorná, P; Posch, L; Šíma, M; Slanař, O; Vobruba, V, 2019
)
2.22
"Individual sufentanil pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated based on therapeutic drug monitoring data using a 2-compartmental model."( Sufentanil Disposition and Pharmacokinetic Model-Based Dosage Regimen for Sufentanil in Ventilated Full-Term Neonates.
Koch, B; Pokorná, P; Šíma, M; Slanař, O; Tibboel, D, 2021
)
2.45
" Median daily COMFORT-B (IQR) scores ranged from 6 to 23 while no significant relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and COMFORT-B scores was found."( Sufentanil Disposition and Pharmacokinetic Model-Based Dosage Regimen for Sufentanil in Ventilated Full-Term Neonates.
Koch, B; Pokorná, P; Šíma, M; Slanař, O; Tibboel, D, 2021
)
2.06

Compound-Compound Interactions

Lowdose sufentanil combined with TAP block is effective for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic hysterectomy. It helps to reduce the incidence of PONV and shorten the first off-bed time and postoperative hospital stay.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"5 mg combined with adrenaline 25 micrograms and sufentanil 10 micrograms; group B received the same solution with clonidine 30 micrograms."( Clonidine combined with sufentanil and bupivacaine with adrenaline for obstetric analgesia.
De Kock, M; Le Polain, B; Scholtes, JL; Van Lierde, M, 1993
)
0.85
"We have studied the use of clonidine combined with low doses of sufentanil and bupivacaine in 45 parturients requiring extradural analgesia for the first stage of labour, in a double-blind, randomized study."( Extradural clonidine combined with sufentanil and 0.0625% bupivacaine for analgesia in labour.
Boulétreau, P; Chassard, D; Dailler, F; Golfier, F; Mathon, L; Tournadre, JP, 1996
)
0.81
" Volatile anesthetics are commonly combined with opioids."( Drug interactions: volatile anesthetics and opioids.
Gan, TJ; Ginsberg, B; Glass, PS; Howell, S, 1997
)
0.3
"Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) using propofol, gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) or midazolam in combination with sufentanil was investigated in 45 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)."( Total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol, gamma-hydroxybutyrate or midazolam in combination with sufentanil for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.
Grundmann, U; Janneck, U; Kleinschmidt, S; Kreienmeyer, J; Kulosa, R; Larsen, R, 1997
)
0.72
" Because clonidine potentiates the analgesic effects of opioids without increasing their side effects, the authors wanted to determine the efficacy of low doses of intrathecal clonidine (15 and 30 microg) combined with sufentanil."( Intrathecal clonidine combined with sufentanil for labor analgesia.
De Kock, M; Fanard, L; Gautier, PE; Hody, JL; Van Steenberge, A, 1998
)
0.76
"In this study, we evaluated the effect of two doses of intrathecal sufentanil combined with bupivacaine and epinephrine on the incidence of pruritus and on the duration and quality of analgesia."( Two doses of intrathecal sufentanil (2.5 and 5 microg) combined with bupivacaine and epinephrine for labor analgesia.
Dumont, L; Mardirosoff, C, 1999
)
0.84
"We evaluated two different doses of intrathecal sufentanil combined with bupivacaine and epinephrine for labor analgesia."( Two doses of intrathecal sufentanil (2.5 and 5 microg) combined with bupivacaine and epinephrine for labor analgesia.
Dumont, L; Mardirosoff, C, 1999
)
0.86
"The purpose of this cardiac fast-track study was to evaluate the use of remifentanil (R) combined with intrathecal (IT) morphine as an alternative to sufentanil (S) during desflurane anesthesia with respect to postoperative pain control."( Fast-track cardiac anesthesia: use of remifentanil combined with intrathecal morphine as an alternative to sufentanil during desflurane anesthesia.
Bossard, R; Chi, L; Douning, LK; Latham, P; Morse, L; Shi, C; White, PF; Zarate, E, 2000
)
0.72
"As part of a cardiac fast-tracking program involving desflurane anesthesia, the use of intrathecal morphine in combination with a remifentanil infusion provided improved postoperative pain control, compared with IV sufentanil alone."( Fast-track cardiac anesthesia: use of remifentanil combined with intrathecal morphine as an alternative to sufentanil during desflurane anesthesia.
Bossard, R; Chi, L; Douning, LK; Latham, P; Morse, L; Shi, C; White, PF; Zarate, E, 2000
)
0.71
" The purpose of this study was to compare three doses of sufentanil combined with low-dose bupivacaine, to determine the lowest appropriate dose."( A comparison of three doses of sufentanil in combination with bupivacaine-adrenaline in continuous epidural analgesia during labour.
Eriksson, SL; Frykholm, P; Olofsson, C; Stenlund, PM, 2000
)
0.84
"To determine whether a low dose of spinal clonidine either alone or combined with sufentanil would provide effective analgesia following abdominal surgery, as a supplement to bupivacaine spinal anesthesia."( Low-dose intrathecal clonidine combined with sufentanil as analgesic drugs in abdominal gynecological surgery.
Julião, MC; Lauretti, GR, 2000
)
0.79
"We previously found that spinal clonidine prolongs labor analgesia when combined with spinal bupivacaine and sufentanil."( Neostigmine combined with bupivacaine, clonidine, and sufentanil for spinal labor analgesia.
D'Angelo, R; Dean, LS; Meister, GC; Nelson, KE, 2001
)
0.77
" Epidural catheters were inserted at T8-T9 (upper abdominal surgery) or T9-T11 (lower abdominal surgery) and ropivacaine 0,5% 7-9 ml (upper abdominal surgery) or 10-12 ml (lower abdominal surgery) combined with sufentanil 30 mcg (group S, n=30) or with morphine 2 mg (group M, n=30) was injected."( [Sufentanil vs morphine combined with ropivacaine for thoracic epidural analgesia in major abdominal surgery].
Borghi, B; Clara, ME; De Paolis, P; Gianferrari, P; Marzullo, A; Montone, N; Voltolina, M, 2001
)
1.41
"Continuous administration of epidural ropivacaine combined with sufentanil or with morphine resulted in good analgesia."( [Sufentanil vs morphine combined with ropivacaine for thoracic epidural analgesia in major abdominal surgery].
Borghi, B; Clara, ME; De Paolis, P; Gianferrari, P; Marzullo, A; Montone, N; Voltolina, M, 2001
)
1.46
" Our aim in the present study was to evaluate the effects of 2% hyperbaric mepivacaine alone, or combined with either intrathecal fentanyl (5 and 10 microg), or sufentanil (2."( Intrathecal fentanyl, sufentanil, or placebo combined with hyperbaric mepivacaine 2% for parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery.
Alparslan, Y; Birnbach, DJ; Bremerich, DH; Byhahn, C; Hall, BA; Kessler, P; Meininger, D; Nordmeyer, J, 2003
)
0.83
"Sensory, motor, and analgesic block characteristics of the local anesthetic mepivacaine alone or combined with intrathecal opioids were studied in parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery in a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial."( Intrathecal fentanyl, sufentanil, or placebo combined with hyperbaric mepivacaine 2% for parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery.
Alparslan, Y; Birnbach, DJ; Bremerich, DH; Byhahn, C; Hall, BA; Kessler, P; Meininger, D; Nordmeyer, J, 2003
)
0.63
" We conclude that spinal mechanisms contribute to the analgesia produced by epidural sufentanil in combination with a local anesthetic."( Spinal mechanisms contribute to analgesia produced by epidural sufentanil combined with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia.
Deleuse, JJ; Jacob, EA; Joris, JL; Kaba, A; Lamy, ML; Sessler, DI, 2003
)
0.78
"When combined with epidural bupivacaine, the sufentanil requirement was 50% less when given epidurally than IV."( Spinal mechanisms contribute to analgesia produced by epidural sufentanil combined with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia.
Deleuse, JJ; Jacob, EA; Joris, JL; Kaba, A; Lamy, ML; Sessler, DI, 2003
)
0.82
"This study evaluated the efficacy of an epidural single dose of neostigmine combined with sufentanil to provide selective and balanced analgesia at the beginning of labor."( Epidural neostigmine combined with sufentanil provides balanced and selective analgesia in early labor.
Lavand'homme, PM; Roelants, F, 2004
)
0.82
" Epidural combination with neostigmine 250 micrograms was ineffective, whereas 750 micrograms did not produce higher effect than 500 micrograms."( Epidural neostigmine combined with sufentanil provides balanced and selective analgesia in early labor.
Lavand'homme, PM; Roelants, F, 2004
)
0.6
"Using ropivacaine combined with sufentanil, we determined the analgesic efficacy of parturient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with or without (demand-only PCEA) continuous background infusion in reducing labor pain in 66 parturients."( Comparison of continuous background infusion plus demand dose and demand-only parturient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for labor and delivery.
Ackermann, HH; Bremerich, DH; Byhahn, C; Meininger, D; Mierdl, S; Waibel, HJ; Zwissler, BC, 2005
)
0.81
"This study compared the efficacy and safety profile of remifentanil and sufentanil in combination with propofol for anesthesia in adult patients undergoing nonemergency intracranial surgery."( Comparison of the time to extubation after use of remifentanil or sufentanil in combination with propofol as anesthesia in adults undergoing nonemergency intracranial surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.
Blanchet, B; Coste, J; Disdet, M; Djian, MC; Gury, C; Joly, LM; Pesce, F; Raggueneau, JL; Roux, FX; Sermet, A; Vazquez, V, 2006
)
0.8
"In these adults undergoing nonemergency intracranial surgery, there was no significant difference in extubation time between those receiving remifentanil and sufentanil infusions adjusted based on hemodynamic parameters in combination with propofol administered by TCI."( Comparison of the time to extubation after use of remifentanil or sufentanil in combination with propofol as anesthesia in adults undergoing nonemergency intracranial surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.
Blanchet, B; Coste, J; Disdet, M; Djian, MC; Gury, C; Joly, LM; Pesce, F; Raggueneau, JL; Roux, FX; Sermet, A; Vazquez, V, 2006
)
0.77
" The current trial describes the dose-response relation of levobupivacaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine, combined with sufentanil, when used for intrathecal labor analgesia."( Determination of the full dose-response relation of intrathecal bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine, combined with sufentanil, for labor analgesia.
Deprest, J; Dreelinck, R; Dubois, J; Kumar, A; Lewi, L; Van de Velde, M; Vandermeersch, E, 2007
)
0.75
"5% (10 mg) combined with either intrathecal fentanyl (10 and 20 microg), or sufentanil (5 microg) in terms of sensory and motor block characteristics."( Comparison of intrathecal bupivacaine and levobupivacaine combined with opioids for Caesarean section.
Bremerich, DH; Byhahn, C; Fetsch, N; Gogarten, W; Meininger, D; Zwissler, BC, 2007
)
0.57
"5% combined with sufentanil 5 microg was the most appropriate anaesthetic regimen in parturients undergoing elective Caesarean delivery in spinal anaesthesia."( Comparison of intrathecal bupivacaine and levobupivacaine combined with opioids for Caesarean section.
Bremerich, DH; Byhahn, C; Fetsch, N; Gogarten, W; Meininger, D; Zwissler, BC, 2007
)
0.68
"125%), all in combination with sufentanil 1 microg/mL with regard to postoperative pain relief and absence of motor block in a patient-controlled epidural analgesia setting."( Postoperative epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty with sufentanil 1 microg/ml combined with ropivacaine 0.2%, ropivacaine 0.125%, or levobupivacaine 0.125%: a randomized, double-blind comparison.
Dahan, A; Rose, L; Sitsen, E; Stienstra, R; van Alphen, W; van Poorten, F,
)
0.65
"To investigate the clinical effects of epidural clonidine pretreatment in epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using sufentanil combined with levobupivacaine."( [Effects of epidural clonidine pretreatment in epidural patient-controlled analgesia using sufentanil combined with levobupivacaine].
Ruan, XC; She, SZ; Su, J; Xie, XQ; Xu, LX, 2008
)
0.77
" 4 microg/ml combined with levobupivacaine 2 mg/ml was given for postoperative epidural patient-controlled analgesia."( [Effects of epidural clonidine pretreatment in epidural patient-controlled analgesia using sufentanil combined with levobupivacaine].
Ruan, XC; She, SZ; Su, J; Xie, XQ; Xu, LX, 2008
)
0.57
"Epidural clonidine 2-4 microg/kg pretreatment improves the clinical effects of epidural PCA using sufentanil combined with levobupivacaine."( [Effects of epidural clonidine pretreatment in epidural patient-controlled analgesia using sufentanil combined with levobupivacaine].
Ruan, XC; She, SZ; Su, J; Xie, XQ; Xu, LX, 2008
)
0.78
" It was aimed to analyze the effectiveness and the side effects of bupivacaine alone and in combination with sufentanil in arthroscopic knee surgery during unilateral spinal anesthesia."( Comparison of bupivacaine alone and in combination with sufentanil in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery.
Akan, B; Albayrak, D; Aydın, F; Erdem, D; Gogus, N; Susleyen, C, 2011
)
0.83
"To evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia."( Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil for post-caesarean section intravenous analgesia: a randomised, placebo-controlled study.
Huang, S; Liu, Y; Luo, Q; Nie, Y, 2014
)
0.92
"To evaluate the analgesic effect of pregabalin combined with intrathecal sufentanil infusion for the treatment of breakthrough pain in patients with bone metastases."( [Pregabalin combined with intrathecal sufentanil infusion for breakthrough pain in patients with bone metastases].
Cao, Q; Gu, S; Huang, D; Wu, L; Xu, H, 2014
)
0.91
"A total of 60 breakthrough pain patients with bone metastases were randomly divided to 3 groups: group A (pregabalin combined with intrathecal sufentanil infusion group, n=20), group B (placebo combined with intrathecal sufentanil infusion group, n=20) and group C (oral morphine sulfate controlled-release tablet group, n=20)."( [Pregabalin combined with intrathecal sufentanil infusion for breakthrough pain in patients with bone metastases].
Cao, Q; Gu, S; Huang, D; Wu, L; Xu, H, 2014
)
0.87
"Pregabalin combined with intrathecal sufentanil infusion can effectively relieve breakthrough pain in patients with bone metastases."( [Pregabalin combined with intrathecal sufentanil infusion for breakthrough pain in patients with bone metastases].
Cao, Q; Gu, S; Huang, D; Wu, L; Xu, H, 2014
)
0.95
" The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of bupivacaine with ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in combination with sufentanil (BUPI-, ROPI-, and LBUPI-SUF respectively) in epidural analgesia for labor."( Efficacy and safety of local anesthetics bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in combination with sufentanil in epidural anesthesia for labor and delivery: a meta-analysis.
Fang, F; Lv, BS; Mi, WD; Wang, JH; Wang, W; Wang, XW; Wang, ZQ, 2014
)
0.81
" In conclusion, BUPI-FEN combination exhibits significantly better tolerability at an approximate ratio of 6 FEN:1 SUF, albeit, both fentanyl and sufentanil in combination with bupivacaine provide similar analgesic properties via the epidural or intrathecal routes for labor pain relief."( Bupivacaine in combination with fentanyl or sufentanil in epidural/intrathecal analgesia for labor: a meta-analysis.
Gao, C; Li, B; Wang, H, 2015
)
0.88
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) of dezocine combined with sufentanil in burn patients after escharectomy or tangential excision followed by autologous skin grafting."( [Application of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia of dezocine combined with sufentanil in burn patients after surgery].
Li, S; Min, S; Tang, W; Wu, B, 2015
)
0.85
"Dezocine combined with sufentanil can provide effective postoperative analgesia with little adverse effect for PCIA in burn patients after escharectomy or tangential excision followed by autologous skin grafting, therefore it can be widely used."( [Application of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia of dezocine combined with sufentanil in burn patients after surgery].
Li, S; Min, S; Tang, W; Wu, B, 2015
)
0.95
"Multipoint TEAS at both proximal and distal points combined with TIVA can significantly decrease intraoperative sufentanil requirements, increase pain relief on postoperative day 1 and improve postoperative recovery of patients during supratentorial tumour resection, with no significant increase of side effects."( Intraoperative and postoperative anaesthetic and analgesic effect of multipoint transcutaneous electrical acupuncture stimulation combined with sufentanil anaesthesia in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy.
An, L; Li, S; Liu, X; Ren, X; Wang, B; Wu, H, 2015
)
0.83
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine in combination with sufentanil or butorphanol for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of a gastrointestinal tumor."( Evaluation of dexmedetomidine in combination with sufentanil or butorphanol for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of gastrointestinal tumors: A quasi-experimental trial.
Chen, QH; Hu, Q; Wang, WX; Zhang, XK, 2016
)
0.91
" This study to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil for PCIA after thoracotomy under general anaesthesia."( Effect of Dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil for post- thoracotomy intravenous analgesia:a randomized, controlled clinical study.
Dong, CS; Lu, Q; Sun, H; Sun, P; Wu, C; Yu, JM; Zhang, J, 2017
)
0.96
" The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil for postoperative analgesia after partial laryngectomy."( Dexmedetomidine in combination with sufentanil for postoperative analgesia after partial laryngectomy.
Chen, K; Liu, T; Qin, M; Shen, X, 2017
)
0.95
"To evaluate effect of parecoxib sodium pretreatment combined with dexmedetomidine on early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients after shoulder arthroscopy."( Effect of parecoxib sodium pretreatment combined with dexmedetomidine on early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients after shoulder arthroscopy: A randomized double blinded controlled trial.
Chen, G; Lu, J; Wu, C; Zhou, H; Zhou, Q; Zhu, Z, 2017
)
0.46
"Parecoxib sodium pretreatment combined with dexmedetomidine could reduce the incidence of early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients."( Effect of parecoxib sodium pretreatment combined with dexmedetomidine on early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients after shoulder arthroscopy: A randomized double blinded controlled trial.
Chen, G; Lu, J; Wu, C; Zhou, H; Zhou, Q; Zhu, Z, 2017
)
0.46
" In the present study, we investigated the effects of TAES combined with low-dose sufentanil pretreatment on the incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus in patients undergoing elective hysteroscopy."( Effects of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation combined with low-dose sufentanil pretreatment on the incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus: A randomized controlled trial.
Dai, Q; Geng, W; He, H; Jin, W; Lv, Y; Mo, Y; Pan, Y; Shou, C; Wang, J; Wang, L; Xie, J, 2018
)
0.93
"Our results suggest that TAES combined with low-dose opioids such as sufentanil can decrease the incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus."( Effects of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation combined with low-dose sufentanil pretreatment on the incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus: A randomized controlled trial.
Dai, Q; Geng, W; He, H; Jin, W; Lv, Y; Mo, Y; Pan, Y; Shou, C; Wang, J; Wang, L; Xie, J, 2018
)
0.94
"The aim of the current study was to evaluate the clinical effects of the regular intermittent epidural injection combined with different puncture points (RIEI-dPP) in suppressing breakthrough pain during a labour analgesia."( Clinical observation of regular intermittent epidural injection combined with different puncture points in suppressing breakthrough pain in labour analgesia.
Jiang, H; Shi, B; Wu, C, 2019
)
0.51
" DEX combined with sufentanil may play a synergistic reaction in causing respiratory distress, but remarkably decreases the incidence of POD."( Effects of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Sufentanil on Postoperative Delirium in Young Patients After General Anesthesia.
Gao, W; Hou, J; Liu, L; Wang, Y; Wu, Y; Xia, Z; Yuan, Q; Zhao, B, 2018
)
1.08
" Statistically significant differences were observed for remifentanil in comparison to fentanyl when combined with propofol: Propofol dose (in mg) -76."( Comparison of Fentanyl, Remifentanil, Sufentanil and Alfentanil in Combination with Propofol for General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Sivaramakrishnan, G; Sridharan, K, 2019
)
0.78
"To conclude, we found that remifentanil has a statistically significant anesthetic profile than fentanyl when combined with propofol."( Comparison of Fentanyl, Remifentanil, Sufentanil and Alfentanil in Combination with Propofol for General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Sivaramakrishnan, G; Sridharan, K, 2019
)
0.78
"To compare the efficacy and safety of postoperative analgesia with low-dose sufentanil combined with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and with sufentanil alone in promoting patients'recovery following laparoscopic hysterectomy."( [Postoperative low-dose sufentanil combined with transversus abdominis plane block promotes recovery following laparoscopic hysterectomy].
Ji, X; Ma, J; Sun, Q; Wang, Q; Wang, S; Zhou, G, 2019
)
1.05
"9% NaCl solution to 100 mL, pumped at the rate of 2 mL/h) combined with TAP block; in group B, the patients received similar postoperative analgesia but at a higher dose of sufentanil (2 μg/kg) without TAP block."( [Postoperative low-dose sufentanil combined with transversus abdominis plane block promotes recovery following laparoscopic hysterectomy].
Ji, X; Ma, J; Sun, Q; Wang, Q; Wang, S; Zhou, G, 2019
)
1.01
"Lowdose sufentanil combined with TAP block is effective for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic hysterectomy and helps to reduce the incidence of PONV and shorten the first off-bed time and postoperative hospital stay to promote the recovery of the patients."( [Postoperative low-dose sufentanil combined with transversus abdominis plane block promotes recovery following laparoscopic hysterectomy].
Ji, X; Ma, J; Sun, Q; Wang, Q; Wang, S; Zhou, G, 2019
)
1.26
" This study was designed to find the median effective dose of propofol for intravenous anaesthesia when combined with low-dose sufentanil."( ED50 of propofol in combination with low-dose sufentanil for intravenous anaesthesia in hysteroscopy.
Chen, H; Li, Y; Liu, C; Song, Y; Xiang, B; Yu, J, 2019
)
0.98
"To evaluate the anesthetic effect of ultrasound-guided (USG) ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve (II/IHN) block combined with genital branch of genitofemoral nerve (GFN) block in the elderly undergoing inguinal hernia repair, 54 old patients (aged 60-96years, ASA I-III) with indirect hernia were enrolled and scheduled for unilateral tension-free herniorrhaphy."( Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Genitofemoral Nerve Block Combined with Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric Nerve Block during Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Elderly.
Huang, Z; Ke, JY; Peng, XH; Wang, W; Xia, W, 2019
)
0.51
"To compare the application and efficacy of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for continuous epidural anesthesia (CEA) and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) in labor analgesia."( Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia.
Wang, Y; Xu, M, 2020
)
1.06
" Ropivacaine combined with sufentanil were used in all subjects."( Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia.
Wang, Y; Xu, M, 2020
)
1.12
"Considering ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for CSEA achieved a shorter onset time and labor period, significant analgesic effect, lower adverse drug reactions rates and higher subject satisfaction than CEA, it may be worthy of clinical promotion and application."( Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia.
Wang, Y; Xu, M, 2020
)
1.1
"Midazolam alone or in combination with sufentanil improved the general indicators along with long duration of sedative analgesia, reduced serum TNF-α, and IL-1β secretion and few adverse reactions."( Effects of midazolam combined with sufentanil on injury and expression of HMGB1 and NF-κB in rats with pancreatitis.
Liu, Y; Liu, YY; Zhou, H; Zhu, ZH, 2020
)
1.1
"Midazolam combined with sufentanil can inhibit the expression of HMGB1 and NF-κB, inhibit inflammation, thereby improving the sedative and analgesic effects, protecting pancreatic tissue, and reducing acute pancreatitis injury."( Effects of midazolam combined with sufentanil on injury and expression of HMGB1 and NF-κB in rats with pancreatitis.
Liu, Y; Liu, YY; Zhou, H; Zhu, ZH, 2020
)
1.14
" This study compared the effectiveness of epidural nalbuphine and sufentanil in combination with ropivacaine for labor analgesia, respectively."( The Effect of Epidural Nalbuphine Combined With Ropivacaine on Epidural Analgesia During Labor: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study.
Cao, R; Chen, Z; Huang, S; Sun, X; Tang, S; Zhou, M; Zhou, Q, 2021
)
0.86
"There are no studies on the use of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil and dezocine-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in females undergoing thoracic surgery."( Dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil and dezocine-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia increases female patients' global satisfaction degree after thoracoscopic surgery.
Li, Q; Wu, J; Xu, M; Yao, H, 2021
)
1.15
"Dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil and dezocine increased female patients' global satisfaction degree after thoracoscopic surgery."( Dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil and dezocine-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia increases female patients' global satisfaction degree after thoracoscopic surgery.
Li, Q; Wu, J; Xu, M; Yao, H, 2021
)
1.2
" In this study, we evaluated the analgesic effects of ulinastatin administered either as a single agent or in combination with sufentanil in a validated preclinical rat model of postoperative pain induced by plantar incision."( The analgesic effects of ulinastatin either as a single agent or in combination with sufentanil: A novel therapeutic potential for postoperative pain.
Chen, GZ; Guo, ZB; Huang, CL; Shi, ZM; Tang, L; Wang, LP; Wu, HH; Wu, XZ; Yang, CL; Yang, F; Zhan, MX; Zou, YQ, 2021
)
1.05
"To investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine combined with citrate sufentanil on the prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia and respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation."( Effects of dexmedetomidine combined with citrate sufentanil on the prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia and respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation.
Huang, J; Ji, M; Wang, J, 2021
)
1.11
" We aimed to compare general anesthesia (GA) and general anesthesia combined with caudal block (GA + CA) in laparoscopic-assisted Soave pull-through of HD."( General versus general anaesthesia combined with caudal block in laparoscopic-assisted Soave pull-through of Hirschsprung disease: a retrospective study.
Fang, Y; He, Y; Lin, Y; Lin, Z; Liu, M; Shen, Y; Wu, D; Yan, L; Zhang, B; Zhang, L, 2021
)
0.62
"General anesthesia combined with caudal block can shorten the duration of operation, and provide more stable intraoperative hemodynamics and better postoperative analgesia."( General versus general anaesthesia combined with caudal block in laparoscopic-assisted Soave pull-through of Hirschsprung disease: a retrospective study.
Fang, Y; He, Y; Lin, Y; Lin, Z; Liu, M; Shen, Y; Wu, D; Yan, L; Zhang, B; Zhang, L, 2021
)
0.62
"Whether epidural administered sufentanil combined with low-concentration ropivacaine affected labor progress as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes still remained unknown."( Impact of epidural labor analgesia using sufentanil combined with low-concentration ropivacaine on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.
Li, Y; Xu, C; Zhang, L, 2021
)
1.18
"This study attempted to investigate the effect of intravenous anesthesia with dexmedetomidine and propofol combined with seaweed polysaccharides on painless induced abortion."( Analysis on the effect of intravenous anesthesia with dexmedetomidine and propofol combined with seaweed polysaccharides on hemodynamics and analgesia in pregnant females undergoing painless induced abortion.
Han, Y; Liu, Z; Wu, J; Yang, L, 2021
)
0.62
"This review and meta-analysis comprehensively elaborated the analgesic and sedative effects of ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine in epidural labor analgesia, and its possible resulting motor block and adverse reactions."( Evaluation of the effect of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in epidural labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guo, G; Liu, W; Wen, J; Zhao, Y; Zhou, H, 2022
)
0.72
"PubMed, Web of science, Cochrane, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and WANFANG DATA were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine in epidural labor analgesia."( Evaluation of the effect of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in epidural labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guo, G; Liu, W; Wen, J; Zhao, Y; Zhou, H, 2022
)
0.72
"To investigated the effects of sufentanil in combination with flurbiprofen axetil and dexmedetomidine for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) on patients after open gastrointestinal tumor surgery, and compared this combination with traditional PCIA with pure opioids or epidural analgesia (PCEA)."( Analgesic effects of sufentanil in combination with flurbiprofen axetil and dexmedetomidine after open gastrointestinal tumor surgery: a retrospective study.
Chen, YJ; Huang, J; Li, TT; Liu, F; Wang, TH; Xiong, LL; Yin, L, 2022
)
1.33
"The analgesic effects of PCIA with sufentanil in combination with flurbiprofen axetil and dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia was better than that of traditional pure opioids PCIA, and similar with that of PCEA."( Analgesic effects of sufentanil in combination with flurbiprofen axetil and dexmedetomidine after open gastrointestinal tumor surgery: a retrospective study.
Chen, YJ; Huang, J; Li, TT; Liu, F; Wang, TH; Xiong, LL; Yin, L, 2022
)
1.32
"To observe the effect of Ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine prior administration on hemodynamics and postoperative sedation in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair."( Effect of ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine prior administration on hemodynamics and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair.
Cai, Z; Fu, B; Kang, Y; Li, Y; Wang, J; Wu, Y, 2022
)
0.72
"100 male patients aged 60 to 80 years old, a line to elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, were randomly divided into four groups: control group (Group A) and dezocine group (Group B), ketorolac tromethamine group (Group C), ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine group (Group D)."( Effect of ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine prior administration on hemodynamics and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair.
Cai, Z; Fu, B; Kang, Y; Li, Y; Wang, J; Wu, Y, 2022
)
0.72
"This study aimed to investigate the effect of ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone in a thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TPVB) combined with an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for thoracoscopic lobectomy analgesia."( Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine or Dexamethasone in a Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block Combined with an Erector Spinae Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Feng, XY; Lei, YJ; Wang, XR; Wang, ZH; Yang, J; Zhang, JW; Zhang, XR; Zhao, M, 2022
)
0.72
" Ultrasound-guided TPVB combined with an erector spinae plane block was given after anesthesia induction."( Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine or Dexamethasone in a Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block Combined with an Erector Spinae Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Feng, XY; Lei, YJ; Wang, XR; Wang, ZH; Yang, J; Zhang, JW; Zhang, XR; Zhao, M, 2022
)
0.72
"Ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone in TPVB combined with ESPB could prolong the time to first postoperative remedial analgesia, reduce perioperative sufentanil and postoperative remedial analgesic drug consumption, and decrease the postoperative NRS score in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy."( Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine or Dexamethasone in a Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block Combined with an Erector Spinae Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Feng, XY; Lei, YJ; Wang, XR; Wang, ZH; Yang, J; Zhang, JW; Zhang, XR; Zhao, M, 2022
)
0.92
" This study aimed to compare the applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block (LSPB) in the supine versus lateral position during lower limb fracture surgery."( Applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine versus lateral position during surgeries for lower limb fracture-a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Hu, X; Li, Y; Song, J; Tao, Z; Wang, L; Xia, X; Xu, Y; Yu, Y, 2022
)
0.72
"We included 126 patients who underwent elective internal fixation for lower limb fracture who were divided into the S group and the L group by the random number table method and underwent LSPB guided by ultrasound combined with a nerve stimulator in the supine and lateral positions, respectively."( Applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine versus lateral position during surgeries for lower limb fracture-a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Hu, X; Li, Y; Song, J; Tao, Z; Wang, L; Xia, X; Xu, Y; Yu, Y, 2022
)
0.72
"In order to study the clinical effect of sufentanil combined with nalmefene in fiberoptic bronchoscopy tracheal intubation in airway patients, a method based on sufentanil combined with nalmefene-assisted topical anesthesia for fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided nasotracheal intubation method is proposed."( Effect of Sufentanil Combined with Nalmefene Assisted Surface Anesthesia on Transnasal Endotracheal Intubation Guided by Fiberoptic Bronchoscope.
Wang, Z; Zhan, Y; Zhang, J; Zhao, Z, 2022
)
1.39
"This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy, opioid consumption, and safety profile of two patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) regimens (sufentanil combined with nalbuphine vs sufentanil alone) after cesarean section (CS)."( Sufentanil Combined with Nalbuphine via Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Evaluation.
Ma, Y; Mu, X; Nie, H; Wang, H; Wang, L; Wang, Y; Zhang, Z; Zheng, Z, 2022
)
2.36
"Parturients (n = 1808) received sufentanil combined with nalbuphine (SN group) or sufentanil alone (S group) as PCIA after CS."( Sufentanil Combined with Nalbuphine via Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Evaluation.
Ma, Y; Mu, X; Nie, H; Wang, H; Wang, L; Wang, Y; Zhang, Z; Zheng, Z, 2022
)
2.45
"Compared with sufentanil alone, sufentanil combined with nalbuphine for PCIA provided superior analgesia in parturient women after CS."( Sufentanil Combined with Nalbuphine via Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Evaluation.
Ma, Y; Mu, X; Nie, H; Wang, H; Wang, L; Wang, Y; Zhang, Z; Zheng, Z, 2022
)
2.52
" This study investigated the effect of different doses of nalbuphine combined with sufentanil for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing a second cesarean section."( Nalbuphine 20 mg combined with sufentanil 2 μg/kg exerts a better postoperative analgesia effect in patients undergoing a second cesarean section: a randomised trial.
Bo, Y; Chen, D; Huang, Y; Jin, H; Li, X; Lin, L; Liu, J; Pan, W; Peng, J; Zhao, Y, 2022
)
1.23
"A single intravenous injection of nalbuphine 20 mg 10 minutes before the infusion of oxytocin combined with sufentanil 2 µg/kg could be safely used for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing a second cesarean section and could effectively inhibit uterine contractions induced by oxytocin and reduce adverse reactions."( Nalbuphine 20 mg combined with sufentanil 2 μg/kg exerts a better postoperative analgesia effect in patients undergoing a second cesarean section: a randomised trial.
Bo, Y; Chen, D; Huang, Y; Jin, H; Li, X; Lin, L; Liu, J; Pan, W; Peng, J; Zhao, Y, 2022
)
1.22
"To explore the effects and safety of low dose of esketamine combined with propofol in elderly patients undergoing fibronchoscopy."( Low dose of esketamine combined with propofol in painless fibronchoscopy in elderly patients.
Chen, Z; Du, T; Feng, Y; Wang, J, 2022
)
0.72
" Patients were allocated to 2 groups based on the postoperative pain treatment they received: treatment group (administered butorphanol combined with sufentanil), and control group (administered conventional sufentanil analgesia)."( Analgesic efficacy of butorphanol combined with sufentanil after heart valve surgery: A propensity score-matching analysis.
Cheng, X; Du, C; Guo, S; Jiang, X; Zhang, W, 2022
)
1.18
"The purpose of the present study (a randomized clinical trial) was to evaluate the preemptive analgesic effects of pregabalin combined with celecoxib in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)."( Positive Preemptive Analgesia Effectiveness of Pregabalin Combined with Celecoxib in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Study.
Ding, C; Liu, X; Xiang, B; Yan, L; Zhou, Y, 2023
)
0.91
"The preemptive analgesia regimen of pregabalin combined with celecoxib had positive effects on improving acute pain and reducing the cumulative dose of opioids after TKA."( Positive Preemptive Analgesia Effectiveness of Pregabalin Combined with Celecoxib in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Study.
Ding, C; Liu, X; Xiang, B; Yan, L; Zhou, Y, 2023
)
0.91
"Sufentanil combined with parecoxib sodium is a commonly used postoperative medication for cancer patients."( Sufentanil combined with parecoxib sodium inhibits proliferation and metastasis of HER2-positive breast cancer cells and regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
Chen, X; Cui, J; Li, W; Li, X; Ma, H; Ma, N; Xu, S; You, X, 2023
)
3.8
"Functional assays indicated that sufentanil combined with parecoxib sodium induced blockade of HER2-positive breast cancer BT474 cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and inhibited cell proliferation, migration, angiogenesis, and invasion in vitro."( Sufentanil combined with parecoxib sodium inhibits proliferation and metastasis of HER2-positive breast cancer cells and regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
Chen, X; Cui, J; Li, W; Li, X; Ma, H; Ma, N; Xu, S; You, X, 2023
)
2.63
"Sufentanil combined with parecoxib sodium inhibited HER2-positive breast cancer progression, including cell proliferation, cell cycle, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis, and regulated EMT."( Sufentanil combined with parecoxib sodium inhibits proliferation and metastasis of HER2-positive breast cancer cells and regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
Chen, X; Cui, J; Li, W; Li, X; Ma, H; Ma, N; Xu, S; You, X, 2023
)
3.8
" Owing to the lag of knowledge in the above said facts, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of propofol combined with sufentanil on the expression of Bax, BCL-2, and caspase-3 genes in spontaneously hypertensive rats suffering with cerebral hemorrhage."( Effects of Propofol Combined with Sufentanil Target-Controlled Intravenous Anesthesia on Expression of Bax, Bcl-2, and Caspase-3 Genes in Spontaneous Hypertensive Rats with Cerebral Hemorrhage: a Prospective Case-Controlled Study.
Ke, Y; Lei, L; Qiao, X; Siqi, Y, 2023
)
1.39
" To avoid difficult airway-related emergency scenarios, the AFNI was successfully performed through intravenous injection of sufentanil and dexmedetomidine combined with lidocaine topical anesthesia under a conscious state without any uncomfortable feeling or complications."( Sufentanil, dexmedetomidine combined with surface anesthesia for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation in the patient with severe mouth opening difficulty undergoing wedge resection of the right upper lung: A case report and literature review.
Lv, X; Sun, P; Yin, D; Zhang, Y, 2023
)
2.56
"Intravenous injection of sufentanil and dexmedetomidine combined with lidocaine topical anesthesia can be used as an alternative medication scheme to relieve uncomfortable suffering for AFNI in patients with severe mouth opening difficulty."( Sufentanil, dexmedetomidine combined with surface anesthesia for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation in the patient with severe mouth opening difficulty undergoing wedge resection of the right upper lung: A case report and literature review.
Lv, X; Sun, P; Yin, D; Zhang, Y, 2023
)
2.66
"To explore the postoperative effects of sufentanil preemptive analgesia combined with psychological intervention on breast cancer patients undergoing radical surgery."( Postoperative effect of sufentanil preemptive analgesia combined with psychological intervention on breast cancer patients.
Jiang, Y; Li, D; Liang, W; Shi, Q; Tan, H; Wang, C, 2023
)
1.48
" Patients in group A were given 10 µg sufentanil preemptive analgesia combined with perioperative psychological support therapy (PPST), group B had only 10 µg sufentanil preemptive analgesia, group C had only PPST, and group D were under general anesthesia with conventional intubation."( Postoperative effect of sufentanil preemptive analgesia combined with psychological intervention on breast cancer patients.
Jiang, Y; Li, D; Liang, W; Shi, Q; Tan, H; Wang, C, 2023
)
1.49
"Sufentanil preemptive analgesia combined with psychological intervention can effectively relieve the postoperative pain of breast cancer patients."( Postoperative effect of sufentanil preemptive analgesia combined with psychological intervention on breast cancer patients.
Jiang, Y; Li, D; Liang, W; Shi, Q; Tan, H; Wang, C, 2023
)
2.66
" The effect of esketamine combined with other common anesthetics on IOP has been underinvestigated."( Effect of intravenous induction with different doses of Esketamine combined with propofol and sufentanil on intraocular pressure among pediatric strabismus surgery: a randomized clinical trial.
Luo, J; Sun, R; Yin, K; Zhang, Z; Zhao, D, 2023
)
1.13
"Propofol combined with sufentanil significantly decreased IOP during the induction of general anesthesia."( Effect of intravenous induction with different doses of Esketamine combined with propofol and sufentanil on intraocular pressure among pediatric strabismus surgery: a randomized clinical trial.
Luo, J; Sun, R; Yin, K; Zhang, Z; Zhao, D, 2023
)
1.44
"To evaluate the efficacy of sufentanil combined with dexmedetomidine in patient-controlled subcutaneous analgesia (PSCA) for advanced cancer pain, 62 patients with advanced cancer pain treated in Department of Oncology of Hebei PetroChina Central Hospital from January 2017 to May 2020 were recruited and assigned via the random number table method to either the control group or the observation group."( Clinical efficacy of sufentanil combined with dexmedetomidine in patient-controlled subcutaneous analgesia for advanced cancer pain.
Du, B; Guo, Q; Qi, X; Wang, B; Xiao, F; Zhang, H; Zhang, J, 2023
)
1.52
"To explore lumbar plexus nerve block combined with general anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip operation could improve analgesia effect, reduce consumption of analgesics, prevent inflammatory reaction, and avoid postoperative delirium(POD)."( [Lumbar plexus block combined with general anesthesia in treating postoperative delirium of hip fracture in elderly patients].
Chen, K; Chen, S; Li, M; Tian, KW; Xiao, Y; Zhang, ZZ; Zhou, X, 2023
)
0.91
"94) kg·m-2;19 patients with hemi arthroplasty, 46 patients with total hip arthroplasty, and 32 patients with femur intertrochanteric fixation;treated with lumbar plexus block combined with general anesthesia."( [Lumbar plexus block combined with general anesthesia in treating postoperative delirium of hip fracture in elderly patients].
Chen, K; Chen, S; Li, M; Tian, KW; Xiao, Y; Zhang, ZZ; Zhou, X, 2023
)
0.91
"Compared with general anesthesia, lumbar plexus nerve block combined with general anesthesia for the operations of hip fracture in elderly patients has better analgesic effect, has advantages of slight inflammatory reaction, and could decrease consumption of opioid and incidence of POD."( [Lumbar plexus block combined with general anesthesia in treating postoperative delirium of hip fracture in elderly patients].
Chen, K; Chen, S; Li, M; Tian, KW; Xiao, Y; Zhang, ZZ; Zhou, X, 2023
)
0.91
" In this study, we studied the efficacy and safety of remazolam combined with propofol for painless gastroscopy."( The study of different dosages of remazolam combined with sufentanil and propofol on painless gastroscopy: A randomized controlled trial.
Dong, S; Tian, Y; Wu, W; Wu, X; Zeng, L; Zhang, T, 2023
)
1.15
"Remazolam 3mg combined with sufentanil and propofol have less effect on hemodynamics in painless gastroscopy, and the patients have shorter awakening time."( The study of different dosages of remazolam combined with sufentanil and propofol on painless gastroscopy: A randomized controlled trial.
Dong, S; Tian, Y; Wu, W; Wu, X; Zeng, L; Zhang, T, 2023
)
1.45
"Remimazolam combined with sufentanil for general anesthesia induction has the advantages of small hemodynamic fluctuations, stable circulation, and few adverse reactions, making it suitable for elderly patients with mild hypertension."( Effects of remimazolam combined with sufentanil on hemodynamics during anesthetic induction in elderly patients with mild hypertension undergoing orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs: a randomized controlled trial.
Duan, G; Lan, H; Shan, W; Wu, J; Xu, Q, 2023
)
1.48
" The objective is to investigate the optimal dose of oxycodone for PCIA combined with paravertebral nerve block, to achieve effective multimodal analgesia management in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer lobectomy."( Effect of oxycodone combined with ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block on postoperative analgesia in patients with lung cancer undergoing thoracoscopic surgery: protocol for a randomised controlled study.
Feng, H; Liu, Z; Shi, P; Su, J; Wang, Y; Wei, X; Wu, G, 2023
)
0.91

Bioavailability

Mean plasma elimination half-life is 13 hours and bioavailability 47-57% after the first sublingual sufentanil tablet. This indicates that the bioavailability of epidurally-administered sufENTanil is reduced and suggests that a large proportion of the drug may be absorbed into the epidural fat.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The ability of acylcarnitines to increase the transmeningeal flux of morphine in vitro suggests that lauroyl or myristoyl carnitine may increase the spinal bioavailability of morphine after epidural administration."( Acylcarnitine chain length influences carnitine-enhanced drug flux through the spinal meninges in vitro.
Bernards, CM; Ummenhofer, WC, 1997
)
0.3
" This indicates that the bioavailability of epidurally-administered sufentanil is reduced and suggests that a large proportion of the drug may be absorbed into the epidural fat."( More epidural than intravenous sufentanil is required to provide comparable postoperative pain relief.
Chauvin, M; Fletcher, D; Guignard, B; Levron, JC; Menigaux, C; Sessler, DI, 2001
)
0.83
"Although liposome encapsulation prolongs the duration of action of epidurally administered drugs, little is known about how liposome encapsulation affects opioids differently, or about how lipid content of liposomes alters the bioavailability of epidurally-administered opioids."( The role of drug-lipid interactions on the disposition of liposome-formulated opioid analgesics in vitro and in vivo.
Bernards, CM; Bethune, CR; Bui-Nguyen, T; Ho, RJ; Shen, DD, 2001
)
0.31
" Bioavailability was calculated by comparing in vivo to in vitro release rates."( Pharmacokinetics of an implanted osmotic pump delivering sufentanil for the treatment of chronic pain.
Fisher, DM; Kellett, N; Lenhardt, R, 2003
)
0.56
" Release rate estimated in vivo was similar to that measured in vitro; bioavailability did not differ from 100%."( Pharmacokinetics of an implanted osmotic pump delivering sufentanil for the treatment of chronic pain.
Fisher, DM; Kellett, N; Lenhardt, R, 2003
)
0.56
"Oral bioavailability (F) is a product of fraction absorbed (Fa), fraction escaping gut-wall elimination (Fg), and fraction escaping hepatic elimination (Fh)."( Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
Chang, G; El-Kattan, A; Miller, HR; Obach, RS; Rotter, C; Steyn, SJ; Troutman, MD; Varma, MV, 2010
)
0.36
" The bioavailability of sufentanil and ketamine was 24."( Intranasal sufentanil/ketamine analgesia in children.
Anderson, BJ; Ferreirós, N; Friis, SM; Henneberg, SW; Labocha, S; Nielsen, BN; Rømsing, J; Schmiegelow, K, 2014
)
1.1
"In the route of administration study (n = 25), mean Cmax values were highest with IV administration, and bioavailability values were: SL, 59%; BU, 78%; and PO, 9%."( Pharmacokinetic properties of single- and repeated-dose sufentanil sublingual tablets in healthy volunteers.
Chiang, YK; Evashenk, MA; Hamel, LG; Hwang, SS; Palmer, PP; Willsie, SK, 2015
)
0.66
" Sublingual nanotablet PCA transmucosal bioavailability is 59% and the meaningful analgesic onset time is 60 minutes."( Sufentanil sublingual formulation for the treatment of acute, moderate to severe postoperative pain in adult patients.
Kokki, H; Kokki, M; Porela-Tiihonen, S, 2017
)
1.9
" The use of MAD even gives as better bioavailability of drugs."( Intranasal drug administration for procedural sedation in children admitted to pediatric Emergency Room.
Chiaretti, A; Fabrizio, GC; Fantacci, C; Ferrara, P; Franceschi, F, 2018
)
0.48
" Mean plasma elimination half-life is 13 hours and bioavailability 47-57% after the first sublingual sufentanil tablet."( An up-to-date overview of sublingual sufentanil for the treatment of moderate to severe pain.
Kokki, H; Kokki, M; Porela-Tiihonen, S, 2020
)
1.05
" This method is suitable not only for evaluation of the pharmacokinetics, toxicology, bioavailability and clinical pharmacology of sufentanil but also for the detection and identification of this compound in human plasma samples for forensic purposes."( Rapid Determination of Sufentanil in Human Plasma by UHPLC-QqQ-MS-MS.
Chłopaś-Konowałek, A; Kowalski, G; Leppert, W; Siczek, M; Sobieszczańska, M; Szpot, P; Wieczorowska-Tobis, K; Zawadzki, M, 2021
)
1.14

Dosage Studied

Intra-operative dosing of sufentanil significantly influenced post-operative morphine consumption, pain and hyperalgesia. A lower dosage of bupivacaine combined with sufENTanil in epidural analgesia significantly improves the obstetric outcome.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" We now report that LiCl pretreatment shifted the antinociceptive dose-response curve produced by the opioid agonists morphine, [D-Ala2, MePhe4, Gly5-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO) and sufentanil in inverse order of their intrinsic efficacy."( Opioid efficacy is linked to the LiCl-sensitive, inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate-restorable pathway.
Connelly, CD; Martinez, RP; Raffa, RB, 1992
)
0.48
"During cardiopulmonary-bypass (CB) procedures, anesthesiologists have traditionally based the administration of narcotics on general dosage recommendations and past experience."( Development of a real-time algorithm for predicting sufentanil plasma levels during cardiopulmonary-bypass surgery using a systems approach.
Gupte, PM; Inchiosa, MA; Liu, MZ; Sanchala, V; Silvern, DA, 1992
)
0.53
" catheters, dose-response curves were carried out using the hot plate (HP) test for a number of receptor-preferring opioids."( Characteristics of dose-dependent antagonism by beta-funaltrexamine of the antinociceptive effects of intrathecal mu agonists.
Mjanger, E; Yaksh, TL, 1991
)
0.28
" On the basis of our dose-response data, we suggest that, in mice, kappa and mu, but not delta, opioid receptors modulate tonic pain perception at both spinal and supraspinal loci."( Tonic pain perception in the mouse: differential modulation by three receptor-selective opioid agonists.
Cowan, A; Murray, CW, 1991
)
0.28
" On day 7, the magnitude of tolerance was assessed in each group by establishing intrathecal dose-response curves and ED50 values for sufentanil and morphine given as a bolus injection."( Differential cross-tolerance between intrathecal morphine and sufentanil in the rat.
Sosnowski, M; Yaksh, TL, 1990
)
0.72
" When the C1 antibody was combined with an iodinated analog to fentanyl, good detectability of alpha-methylfentanyl and 3-methylfentanyl, in terms of fentanyl equivalents, was obtained from urine samples of dosed mares."( Pharmacologic effects and detection methods of methylated analogs of fentanyl in horses.
Blake, JW; Tai, CL; Tai, HH; Tobin, T; Weckman, TJ; Woods, WE, 1989
)
0.28
" dose-response curves for the effect of the chronic drug given as a bolus."( Potency of infused spinal antinociceptive agents is inversely related to magnitude of tolerance after continuous infusion.
Stevens, CW; Yaksh, TL, 1989
)
0.28
" The AUC0-120 min after intranasal dosing was 78 per cent of that after intravenous injection."( Comparison of intravenous and intranasal sufentanil absorption and sedation.
Helmers, JH; Noorduin, H; Van Leeuwen, L; Van Peer, A; Zuurmond, WW, 1989
)
0.54
" The dosage scheme used in this study, which consisted of a sufentanil bolus followed by a continuous infusion, prevented plasma concentrations of sufentanil from declining in both groups during the entire study period."( [The effect of sufentanil in high doses on hemodynamics and electroencephalography activity in coronary patients].
Lange, H; Lüpke, K; Sonntag, H; Stephan, H, 1989
)
0.87
" The slopes of the monotonic dose-response curves for the five opioids did not differ significantly."( Studies of the pharmacology and pathology of intrathecally administered 4-anilinopiperidine analogues and morphine in the rat and cat.
Durant, PA; Noueihed, RY; Yaksh, TL, 1986
)
0.27
" After SUF dosing in dogs, N-[4-(methoxymethyl)-4-piperidinyl]-N-phenylpropanamide was more abundant than M5."( Excretion and biotransformation of alfentanil and sufentanil in rats and dogs.
Hendrickx, J; Heykants, J; Hurkmans, R; Lauwers, W; Meuldermans, W; Swysen, E; Thijssen, J; Timmerman, P; Woestenborghs, R,
)
0.38
" Thus, the dose-response curves for fentanyl and sufentanil were shifted to the left and the ED50 of the analgesics lowered in droperidol pre-treated animals."( Droperidol enhances fentanyl and sufentanil, but not morphine, analgesia.
Bansinath, M; Lovitz, M; Puig, MM; Statile, L; Turndorf, H; Warner, W, 1988
)
0.81
" We conclude that sufentanil administered in the dosage range of 19 micrograms/kg allows more rapid induction, earlier emergence from anesthesia, and faster extubation of patients than either morphine or fentanyl."( A comparison of morphine, fentanyl, and sufentanil anesthesia for cardiac surgery: induction, emergence, and extubation.
Dec-Silver, H; Harrison, WK; Sanford, TJ; Smith, NT, 1986
)
0.87
" Dosage above 50 micrograms did not seem to improve the quality or duration of pain relief, although the onset of action was faster with 75 micrograms."( Epidural sufentanil for postoperative pain relief.
Donadoni, R; Noorduin, H; Rolly, G; Vanden Bussche, G, 1985
)
0.69
" A sigmoidal dose-response curve was described."( The decrease of the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration produced by sufentanil in rats.
DiFazio, CA; Engle, JS; Hecker, BR; Lake, CL; Moscicki, JC, 1983
)
0.5
" In these animals, withdrawal of nimodipine for 48 hr returned the dose-response curve of sufentanil to the tolerant values, whereas Ca++ channels remained increased."( Regulation of dihydropyridine-sensitive Ca++ channels during opioid tolerance and supersensitivity in rats.
Díaz, A; Flórez, J; Hurlé, MA; Pazos, A; Ruíz, F, 1995
)
0.51
" Dose-response functions of sufentanil, clonidine and combinations of clonidine plus sufentanil were determined."( Interactions between the lipophilic opioid sufentanil and clonidine in rats after spinal application.
De Kock, M; Meert, TF, 1995
)
0.85
" We investigated the role of each of these primary pharmacokinetic parameters to determine values of each that would contribute to rapid recovery after various dosing schemes."( Pharmacokinetic parameters relevant to recovery from opioids.
Shafer, SL; Youngs, EJ, 1994
)
0.29
"To determine the influence of stimulation intensity on dose-response curves of three analgesics in halothane-anesthetized rats, continued immersion of the tail in 52."( Suppression of nociceptive responses by spinal mu opioid agonists: effects of stimulus intensity and agonist efficacy.
Saeki, S; Yaksh, TL, 1993
)
0.29
" Drug detection up to 24 h after dosing was necessary to define the terminal elimination phase."( Linearity of pharmacokinetics and model estimation of sufentanil.
Camu, F; Gepts, E; Heykants, JJ; Shafer, SL; Stanski, DR; Van Peer, A; Woestenborghs, R, 1995
)
0.54
"To assess effects of stimulus intensity, dose-response curves in rats for radiant heat-evoked withdrawal of the hind paw was assessed after the intrathecal (i."( Differential right shifts in the dose-response curve for intrathecal morphine and sufentanil as a function of stimulus intensity.
Dirig, DM; Yaksh, TL, 1995
)
0.52
" A threefold increase of sufentanil dosing did not significantly affect the induction times nor recovery times following propofol anesthesia."( Influence of sufentanil on propofol anesthesia using a target controlled infusion system.
Camu, F; Lauwers, MH; Los, GJ; Van Lersberghe, C, 1995
)
0.96
"ml-1 and observed mean AUC values from 0 to 3 min were all consistent with the dosing regimens."( Cardiovascular effects of different infusion rates of sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary surgery.
Barnette, R; Borenstein, M; Cooney, G; Johnson, W; Shupak, R; Tzeng, TB, 1997
)
0.55
" This study was performed to establish the dose-response relationship of intrathecal sufentanil analgesia in labor."( Determination of the dose-response relationship for intrathecal sufentanil in laboring patients.
Calicott, R; Conlin, G; Herman, NL; Tilton, J; Van Decar, TK, 1997
)
0.76
"This study was designed to determine and compare the dose-response characteristics, speed of onset, and relative potency of single-dose epidural fentanyl (F) and sufentanil (S) for postoperative pain relief."( A randomized, double-blind, dose-response comparison of epidural fentanyl versus sufentanil analgesia after cesarean section.
Grass, JA; Harris, AP; Michitsch, R; Sakima, NT; Schmidt, R; Zuckerman, RL, 1997
)
0.72
" Through an understanding of the pharmacodynamic interaction of volatile anesthetics with opioids and the pharmacokinetic processes responsible for the recovery from drug effect, optimal dosing schemes can thus be developed."( Drug interactions: volatile anesthetics and opioids.
Gan, TJ; Ginsberg, B; Glass, PS; Howell, S, 1997
)
0.3
"It is concluded that a lower dosage of bupivacaine combined with sufentanil in epidural analgesia significantly improves the obstetric outcome as compared to a higher dosage of bupivacaine with adrenaline using intermittent bolus technique."( Obstetric outcome following epidural analgesia with bupivacaine-adrenaline 0.25% or bupivacaine 0.125% with sufentanil--a prospective randomized controlled study in 1000 parturients.
Ekblom, A; Ekman-Ordeberg, G; Irestedt, L; Olofsson, C, 1998
)
0.75
" As dose-response curves are determined for other labor analgesics, future studies can compare equianalgesic doses or dose combinations."( Intrathecal sufentanil dose response in nulliparous patients.
Arkoosh, VA; Boxer, L; Cooper, M; Ferouz, F; Huffnagle, HJ; Huffnagle, S; Leighton, BL; Norris, MC; Silverman, NS, 1998
)
0.68
" The duration of analgesia was nearly equivalent in all sufentanil-alone groups (83, 102, and 99 minutes); a dose-response effect was more apparent in the bupivacaine group (35, 42, and 74 minutes; P = ."( Intrathecal sufentanil and epidural bupivacaine for labor analgesia: dose-response of individual agents and in combination.
Abouleish, A; Camann, W; Datta, S; Eisenach, J; Hood, D,
)
0.76
"125% behaves in a dose-response fashion allowing for the determination of equipotent dose of each."( Determination of the analgesic dose-response relationship for epidural fentanyl and sufentanil with bupivacaine 0.125% in laboring patients.
Gadalla, F; Herman, NL; Koff, HD; Reynolds, JE; Rubin, JD; Sheu, KL; Van Decar, TK, 1998
)
0.52
" Afterwards, the opioids were administered continuously with cumulative dosage up to total absence of motor evoked response."( Influence of fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil on motor evoked potentials.
Hanisch, M; Hoeft, A; Juntke, R; Nadstawek, J; Pechstein, U; Scheufler, KM; Thees, C; Zentner, J, 1999
)
0.57
" The epidural catheter can be dosed intermittently for parturients in whom labor is prolonged, who require surgical manipulation for vaginal delivery, or who require cesarean section for delivery."( Spinal and combined spinal epidural techniques for labor analgesia: clinical application in a small hospital.
Harris, LG, 1998
)
0.3
" Additionally, doses approximately double these ED50s each produced a similar duration of analgesia and side effects, indicating intrathecal neostigmine shifts the dose-response curve for intrathecal sufentanil to the left."( Intrathecal neostigmine and sufentanil for early labor analgesia.
D'Angelo, R; Eisenach, JC; Foss, ML; Hood, DD; Meister, GC; Nelson, KE, 1999
)
0.79
"0 micrograms kg-1, the dosage was adjusted to the patients needs (0."( No reduction in the sufentanil requirement of elderly patients undergoing ventilatory support in the medical intensive care unit.
Frass, M; Freye, E; Hammerschmidt, V; Hofbauer, R; Kofler, J; Kordova, H; Staudinger, T; Tesinsky, P; Vrastiolova, M, 1999
)
0.63
"25 microgram/kg/min, or sufentanil (S-group) 1 microgram/kg before surgery with dosage adjustments according to haemodynamic parameters."( [Endocrine stress parameters during TIVA with remifentanil or sufentanil].
Bastian, C; Brockmann, C; Raasch, W, 2000
)
0.85
" With increasing stimulus intensity, the dose-response curves showed a progressive shift to the right, but this shift was only slight with the highest intensity stimuli."( Effects of intravenous and intrathecal sufentanil on a C-fibre reflex elicited by a wide range of stimulus intensities in the rat.
Adam, F; Chauvin, M; Guirimand, F, 2001
)
0.58
" However, when making a choice between fentanyl and sufentanil, one must consider other important factors, such as the higher cost of sufentanil and the greater risk of dosing error due to the higher potency of sufentanil compared with fentanyl."( A comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil for labor analgesia.
D'Angelo, R; Nelson, KE; Rauch, T; Terebuh, V, 2002
)
0.83
" Using a mouse hot-plate test, dose-response relationships were first determined for all compounds individually and then for opioids co-administered with fixed doses of ketamine or dextromethorphan."( Dextromethorphan and ketamine potentiate the antinociceptive effects of mu- but not delta- or kappa-opioid agonists in a mouse model of acute pain.
Baker, AK; Hoffmann, VL; Meert, TF, 2002
)
0.31
" Measuring rectal body temperatures, dose-response relationships were established for all compounds."( Morphine and d-amphetamine nullify each others' hypothermic effects in mice.
Baker, A; Meert, T, 2003
)
0.32
"2% in oxygen and nitrous oxide and the opioid dosing was titrated to autonomic responses."( Remifentanil infusion for cleft palate surgery in young infants.
Dagher, C; Desjeux, L; Gall, O; Murat, I; Roulleau, P, 2003
)
0.32
" Fentanyl and sufentanil require higher hypnotic dosage (halogenated agents, propofol) and remifentanil is accompanied by greater volumes of fluid infusion."( [Opioid anesthetics (sufentanil and remifentanil) in neuro-anaesthesia].
Garnier, F; Viviand, X, 2004
)
1
" Sufentanil is a widely used opioid agent, but its optimal dosage has not yet been defined."( Epidural analgesia in abdominal surgery: 0.2% ropivacaine with sufentanil.
Adducci, E; Beccia, G; De Cosmo, G; Fiorenti, M; Primieri, P, 2004
)
1.47
" Although minimum local analgesic concentration studies suggested that they are less potent than bupivacaine, full dose-response studies have not been performed."( Determination of the full dose-response relation of intrathecal bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine, combined with sufentanil, for labor analgesia.
Deprest, J; Dreelinck, R; Dubois, J; Kumar, A; Lewi, L; Van de Velde, M; Vandermeersch, E, 2007
)
0.55
" Group-specific dose-response curves were constructed using a probit regression model."( Determination of the full dose-response relation of intrathecal bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine, combined with sufentanil, for labor analgesia.
Deprest, J; Dreelinck, R; Dubois, J; Kumar, A; Lewi, L; Van de Velde, M; Vandermeersch, E, 2007
)
0.55
"This full dose-response study suggests that ropivacaine and levobupivacaine are of similar potency, whereas bupivacaine is more potent than both other drugs."( Determination of the full dose-response relation of intrathecal bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine, combined with sufentanil, for labor analgesia.
Deprest, J; Dreelinck, R; Dubois, J; Kumar, A; Lewi, L; Van de Velde, M; Vandermeersch, E, 2007
)
0.55
" The dosage of PCA drug 0-4 h after operation of the C2 was significantly higher than that of the C4 group."( [Effects of epidural clonidine pretreatment in epidural patient-controlled analgesia using sufentanil combined with levobupivacaine].
Ruan, XC; She, SZ; Su, J; Xie, XQ; Xu, LX, 2008
)
0.57
"The time and the dosage of etomidate necessary to loss consciousness were greater in group F ((70."( Peri-intubation hemodynamic changes during low dose fentanyl, remifentanil and sufentanil combined with etomidate for anesthetic induction.
Sun, L; Zhang, GH, 2009
)
0.58
") analgesia in labor is well recognized, but information on dosing is limited."( On the ropivacaine-reducing effect of low-dose sufentanil in intrathecal labor analgesia.
Faybik, P; Grabovica, J; Gustorff, B; Kimberger, O; Ortner, CM; Posch, M; Roessler, B; Rützler, K, 2010
)
0.62
" In phase one, sufentanil dose-response was calculated using logistic regression."( On the ropivacaine-reducing effect of low-dose sufentanil in intrathecal labor analgesia.
Faybik, P; Grabovica, J; Gustorff, B; Kimberger, O; Ortner, CM; Posch, M; Roessler, B; Rützler, K, 2010
)
0.97
" Increasing dosage implicates no clinical benefit."( On the ropivacaine-reducing effect of low-dose sufentanil in intrathecal labor analgesia.
Faybik, P; Grabovica, J; Gustorff, B; Kimberger, O; Ortner, CM; Posch, M; Roessler, B; Rützler, K, 2010
)
0.62
"NT monitoring can be used to effectively predict the recovery of consciousness in patients undergoing abdominal surgery and facilitates a significant reduction of the recovery time and sufentanil dosage during a sevoflurane-sufentanil anesthesia."( [Narcotrend index monitoring can predict the recovery of consciousness in patients undergoing abdominal surgery].
Gu, MN; Sun, CJ; Xu, JS, 2010
)
0.55
"This prospective randomized double-blind dose-response study aimed to determine the ED₅₀ and ED₉₅ of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with morphine and sufentanil for elective Caesarean delivery."( ED₅₀ and ED₉₅ of intrathecal levobupivacaine with opioids for Caesarean delivery.
Allaouchiche, B; Boselli, E; Bouvet, L; Chassard, D; Da-Col, X; Daléry, F; Dantony, E; Ruynat, L, 2011
)
0.57
" The dose-response relationship of propofol for the maintenance of adequate anesthesia based on BIS, movement and hemodynamic response was investigated using a fixed effect-site concentration of sufentanil (0."( Predicted effect-site concentration of propofol and sufentanil for gynecological laparoscopic surgery.
Cho, CK; Jeong, SJ; Jung, SM; Kang, PS; Kwon, HU; Lim, YS; Oh, JY; Yang, CW, 2011
)
0.81
" The infarct size limitation of sufentanil was dose-dependent, 1 μg/kg has the optimal effect and increasing dosage could not afford further cardioprotection."( Sufentanil limits the myocardial infarct size by preservation of the phosphorylated connexin 43.
Fang, WP; Gu, EW; Liu, XQ; Wu, Y; Zhang, L; Zhu, Y, 2012
)
2.11
"Intra-operative dosing of sufentanil significantly influenced post-operative morphine consumption, pain and hyperalgesia."( The impact of intra-operative sufentanil dosing on post-operative pain, hyperalgesia and morphine consumption after cardiac surgery.
Fechner, J; Ihmsen, H; Jeleazcov, C; Schüttler, J, 2013
)
0.98
"Sufentanil formulated as a sublingual solid dosage form provides a duration of action that allows effective analgesia for postoperative patients in a medically supervised setting."( Pharmacokinetics of sublingual sufentanil tablets and efficacy and safety in the management of postoperative pain.
Chiang, YK; Evashenk, MA; Hamel, LG; Hwang, SS; Minkowitz, HS; Palmer, PP; Singla, NK,
)
1.86
" The application of this patient-derived population model in individualized pain therapy should improve the dosing of hydromorphone in patients undergoing cardiac surgery."( Population pharmacokinetic modeling of hydromorphone in cardiac surgery patients during postoperative pain therapy.
Fechner, J; Fröhlich, K; Ihmsen, H; Jeleazcov, C; Krajinovic, L; Mell, J; Saari, TI; Schüttler, J, 2014
)
0.4
" The dose-response relationships of sufentanil for providing adequate analgesia were evaluated by visual analog scales and Ramsay sedation scores."( Prediction of effect-site concentration of sufentanil by dose-response target controlled infusion of sufentanil and propofol for analgesic and sedation maintenance in burn dressing changes.
Cao, D; Chen, L; Lin, X; Wang, M; Xiang, H; Ye, L, 2014
)
0.94
" There are often patients who desire extensive liposuction on approximately 30% of total body surface area, which means the lidocaine total dose might be over the dosing recommendation."( Safe extensive tumescent liposuction with segmental infiltration of lower concentration lidocaine under monitored anesthesia care.
Cao, WG; Jiang, ZH; Li, SL; Liu, LN; Wang, G, 2015
)
0.42
"Sufentanil protein binding was significantly dependent on changes in the total drug concentration and volume balance addressing the importance of adequate dosing and fluid-guided therapy."( Influence of intensive care treatment on the protein binding of sufentanil and hydromorphone during pain therapy in postoperative cardiac surgery patients.
Fechner, J; Fröhlich, K; Ihmsen, H; Jeleazcov, C; Mell, J; Saari, TI; Schüttler, J, 2014
)
2.08
" The SSM 20-µg dosage strength was not superior to placebo for primary or secondary efficacy measures."( A dose-finding study of sufentanil sublingual microtablets for the management of postoperative bunionectomy pain.
Evashenk, MA; Muse, DD; Palmer, PP; Singla, NK, 2014
)
0.71
" Rapid distribution from the plasma after IV sufentanil administration results in a short duration of action requiring excessive repeated dosing if used for postoperative analgesia."( Pharmacokinetic properties of single- and repeated-dose sufentanil sublingual tablets in healthy volunteers.
Chiang, YK; Evashenk, MA; Hamel, LG; Hwang, SS; Palmer, PP; Willsie, SK, 2015
)
0.92
" The wide range of mean drug concentrations achieved after repeated dosing at 20-minute intervals compared with those with a single dose suggests the flexibility of patient-controlled dosing to meet individual analgesic requirements."( Pharmacokinetic properties of single- and repeated-dose sufentanil sublingual tablets in healthy volunteers.
Chiang, YK; Evashenk, MA; Hamel, LG; Hwang, SS; Palmer, PP; Willsie, SK, 2015
)
0.66
"This was a prospective randomized double-blind dose-response study."( Sparing effects of sufentanil on epidural ropivacaine in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate surgery.
He, R; Li, H; Li, Y, 2015
)
0.75
"05), whereas the total dosage and dosage per body weight of sufentanil were significantly lower in D1 group than that of S group only at 4, 8, and 16 hours after surgery (P < 0."( Effect of Intraoperative and Postoperative Infusion of Dexmedetomidine on the Quality of Postoperative Analgesia in Highly Nicotine-Dependent Patients After Thoracic Surgery: A CONSORT-Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Li, C; Liu, Z; Qi, F; Ren, C; Zhang, X; Zhang, Z, 2015
)
0.66
" This study was to determine the dose-response of intrathecal ropivacaine in patients with scarred uterus undergoing cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia."( The Dose-response of Intrathecal Ropivacaine Co-administered with Sufentanil for Cesarean Delivery under Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia in Patients with Scarred Uterus.
Liu, L; Liu, X; Wang, LZ; Xiao, F; Xu, WP; Zhang, YF, 2015
)
0.65
" Resting and coughing NRS scores and sufentanil dosage were recorded 0, 1, 4 hours, and every 4 hours until 48 hours after surgery."( Effects of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Pain in Highly Nicotine-Dependent Patients After Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Cai, X; Liu, D; Lu, S; Wu, S; Yu, A; Zhang, P; Zhang, Z, 2016
)
0.71
" Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) is a major method in reducing the severe pain after the surgery in our institution, but some adverse effects prevent the use of adequate dosage opioids."( The optimal dose of dexmedetomidine added to an sufentanil-based analgesic regimen for postoperative pain control in spine surgery: A probit analysis study.
Dong, CS; Lu, Q; Lu, Y; Sun, P; Wu, C; Yu, JM; Zhang, J, 2016
)
0.69
"In addition, the data were also gathered on the dosage of ephedrine and atropine were used, as well as the intraoperative awareness in the patients who were followed up on the first day after the operation."( [Impact of dexmedetomidine-sevoflurane anesthesia on intraoperative wake-up test in children patients undergoing scoliosis surgery].
An, HX; Quan, LX; Wang, DX, 2016
)
0.43
"Our aim was to describe the effect of dosing and genetic factors on sufentanil- and midazolam-induced analgosedation and withdrawal syndrome (WS) in pediatric population."( Sufentanil and midazolam dosing and pharmacogenetic factors in pediatric analgosedation and withdrawal syndrome.
Hronová, K; Pokorná, P; Posch, L; Slanař, O, 2016
)
2.11
"This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study comparing 2 sufentanil dosing regimens used between 2001 and 2010 and included all infants born at <28 weeks of gestation with surgical ductal closure."( Reduced Sufentanil Doses are Effective for Postoperative Analgesia After Ductal Closure in Extremely Premature Infants: A 10 Years Retrospective Cohort Study.
Audureau, E; Blary, S; Danan, C; Decobert, F; Durrmeyer, X; Jaby, O; Soreze, Y, 2017
)
1.13
"①The total dosage of sufentanil in the observation group was less than that in the control group[(1."( [Clinical research of electroacupuncture on the analgesic effect of thoracic perioperative stage].
Chang, J; Dong, X; Han, X; Li, Y; Wang, Y; Xing, Q; Zhou, M, 2017
)
0.77
" However, the duration of apnea increased with the increasing dosage of sufentanil."( The optimal bolus dose of sufentanil for satisfactory laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion conditions in chinese pediatric patients: A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial (CONSORT).
Chen, Y; Li, G; Li, N; Li, T; Li, Y; Lin, G; Ouyang, B, 2019
)
1.05
" It is a single-strength tablet housed in a single-dose applicator (which may minimize the likelihood of dosing errors) and is strictly for use in medically supervised/monitored settings."( Sufentanil 30 µg Sublingual Tablet: A Review in Acute Pain.
Deeks, ED, 2019
)
1.96
" The pain intensity, consumed sufentanil dosage of the PCA, and the side effects was not different between groups."( Effect of flurbiprofen axetil on postoperative delirium for elderly patients.
Chen, H; Han, F; Hu, Y; Wang, L; Wang, X; Wang, Y; Wei, L; Zhao, W, 2019
)
0.8
" However, the optimal dosage of propofol when it is co-administered with low-dose sufentanil has not yet been established."( ED50 of propofol in combination with low-dose sufentanil for intravenous anaesthesia in hysteroscopy.
Chen, H; Li, Y; Liu, C; Song, Y; Xiang, B; Yu, J, 2019
)
1
" The initial and total dosage of propofol in Group A were significantly lower than those in Group B, but the incidence of respiratory depression in Group A (26."( ED50 of propofol in combination with low-dose sufentanil for intravenous anaesthesia in hysteroscopy.
Chen, H; Li, Y; Liu, C; Song, Y; Xiang, B; Yu, J, 2019
)
0.77
" The decreased recovery of mainly sufentanil and propofol could lead to suboptimal dosing of patients during cardiac surgery with CPB."( In Vitro Recovery of Sufentanil, Midazolam, Propofol, and Methylprednisolone in Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Bypass Systems.
Bogers, AJJC; Kinzig, M; Koch, BCP; Sörgel, F; Stolker, RJ; Tibboel, D; van Hoeven, MPJ; van Rosmalen, J; van Saet, A; Wildschut, ED; Zeilmaker-Roest, GA, 2020
)
1.16
"To aid nurses in dosing sufentanil sublingual tablet (SST) 30 mcg administered via a single-dose applicator, dosing requirements and efficacy of SST 30 mcg were analyzed across age, sex, race, and body mass index subgroups."( Pooled Dosing and Efficacy Analysis of the Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet 30 mcg Across Demographic Subgroups for the Management of Moderate-to-Severe Acute Pain.
DiDonato, KP; Hutchins, JL; Leiman, D; Palmer, PP; Rafique, Z, 2020
)
1.13
" Drug dosing and efficacy data were pooled from the postoperative studies."( Pooled Dosing and Efficacy Analysis of the Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet 30 mcg Across Demographic Subgroups for the Management of Moderate-to-Severe Acute Pain.
DiDonato, KP; Hutchins, JL; Leiman, D; Palmer, PP; Rafique, Z, 2020
)
0.82
" CYP3A4*1G polymorphism related to postoperative VAS score, medication dosage and prevalence of adverse reactions in sufentanil group (p<0."( Correlation between gene polymorphism and opioid efficacy in patients with gastric or intestinal cancer.
He, XY; Huang, ZK; Pu, J; Wang, N; Yuan, HB, 2019
)
0.72
" Specifically, this patient did not experience the major withdrawal that would be expected given significant under dosing of opioid, and this may be explained by the lipophilicity and context-sensitive half-times of sufentanil."( Malfunctioning sufentanil intrathecal pain pump: a case report.
Branstad, A; Eldrige, J; Hunter Guevara, L; Matzke Bitterman, L; Nicholson, W; Pingree, M; Warner, L, 2020
)
1.1
"01) and sufentanil dosage (P < 0."( Effects of menstrual cycle on nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia.
Miao, S; Wang, G; Wang, L; Zou, L, 2020
)
0.99
" Pruritus, hypotension, motor block, maternal satisfaction, delivery mode, decreased fetal heart rate, total bupivacaine dose and breastfeeding scores were not significantly different among the 3 groups except the sufentanil dosage and incidence of mild drowsiness and fever (the B1S10 group had significantly higher fever than the other groups)."( A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Epidural Analgesia Onset Time and Adverse Reactions During Labor With Different Dose Combinations of Bupivacaine and Sufentanil.
Huang, S; Lu, Y; Wang, T; Yu, X; Zhou, P, 2020
)
0.94
" Dosing interval is a minimum of 20 min for a 15 mcg tablet and a treatment duration of up to 72 hours."( An up-to-date overview of sublingual sufentanil for the treatment of moderate to severe pain.
Kokki, H; Kokki, M; Porela-Tiihonen, S, 2020
)
0.83
" There was no significant difference in the dosage of sufentanil, propofol, remifentanil and vecuronium, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, the delay of recovery, dizziness, drowsiness or respiratory depression between the two groups (P >  0."( Ketorolac tromethamine pretreatment suppresses sufentanil-induced cough during general anesthesia induction: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Chen, B; Hu, B; Miao, M; Tian, Z; Wang, L; Zhang, L, 2020
)
1.06
" The objective of this trial was to elucidate whether haemodynamic or electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring parameters during general anaesthesia or sevoflurane dosage correlate with the incidence of PODE."( Intraoperative monitoring parameters and postoperative delirium: Results of a prospective cross-sectional trial.
Diegmann, O; Fielbrand, R; Fischer-Kumbruch, M; Hinken, L; Jung, C; Krauß, T; Scheinichen, D; Schenk, I; Schultz, B; Trübenbach, D, 2021
)
0.62
" We included any duration of drug treatment and any dosage given continuously or as bolus; we excluded studies that gave opioids to ventilated infants for procedures."( Opioids for newborn infants receiving mechanical ventilation.
Bellù, R; Bruschettini, M; de Waal, KA; Nava, C; Romantsik, O; Zanini, R, 2021
)
0.62
" However, the equation for predicting sufentanil dosage postoperatively based on genetic design has been established yet."( Establishment of predicting equation for individual sufentanil dosage postoperatively based on gene polymorphisms.
Cheng, H; Ding, C; He, Y; Kong, L; Sun, Y; Zeng, R; Zhuang, W, 2022
)
1.24
" To establish sufentanil dosage postoperatively for patients with gastric cancer, we collected patients' basic information and CYP3A4*1G, COMTVal158Met, OPRM1A118G, and ABCB1C3435T gene sequencing results."( Establishment of predicting equation for individual sufentanil dosage postoperatively based on gene polymorphisms.
Cheng, H; Ding, C; He, Y; Kong, L; Sun, Y; Zeng, R; Zhuang, W, 2022
)
1.33
"The sufentanil dosage prediction equation postoperatively was y = 4."( Establishment of predicting equation for individual sufentanil dosage postoperatively based on gene polymorphisms.
Cheng, H; Ding, C; He, Y; Kong, L; Sun, Y; Zeng, R; Zhuang, W, 2022
)
1.53
"We established the prediction equation for individual sufentanil dosage postoperatively based on gene polymorphisms."( Establishment of predicting equation for individual sufentanil dosage postoperatively based on gene polymorphisms.
Cheng, H; Ding, C; He, Y; Kong, L; Sun, Y; Zeng, R; Zhuang, W, 2022
)
1.22
" Hence, we designed aerosol inhalation of lidocaine by ultrasonic atomizer, to seek whether the dosage of sufentanil for intubation could be less or not."( Sufentanil EC50 for endotracheal intubation with aerosol inhalation of carbonated lidocaine by ultrasonic atomizer.
Ai, L; Liu, J; Tian, X; Xu, Q; Zhou, Z, 2021
)
2.28
"Aerosol inhalation of lidocaine by ultrasonic atomizer reduced the dosage of sufentanil for endotracheal intubation."( Sufentanil EC50 for endotracheal intubation with aerosol inhalation of carbonated lidocaine by ultrasonic atomizer.
Ai, L; Liu, J; Tian, X; Xu, Q; Zhou, Z, 2021
)
2.29
"Sufentanil is a potent synthetic opioid used for analgesia in neonates; however, data concerning drug disposition of sufentanil and dosage regimen are sparse in this population."( Sufentanil Disposition and Pharmacokinetic Model-Based Dosage Regimen for Sufentanil in Ventilated Full-Term Neonates.
Koch, B; Pokorná, P; Šíma, M; Slanař, O; Tibboel, D, 2021
)
3.51
"Body weight and gestational age were found as weak covariates for sufentanil distribution, and the dosage regimen was developed for a prospective trial."( Sufentanil Disposition and Pharmacokinetic Model-Based Dosage Regimen for Sufentanil in Ventilated Full-Term Neonates.
Koch, B; Pokorná, P; Šíma, M; Slanař, O; Tibboel, D, 2021
)
2.3
" However, there is no unified consensus on the exact dosage of sufentanil with the combination of ropivacaine in the induction of epidural analgesia in the early first stage of labor."( The 90% Effective Dose of Sufentanil for Epidural Analgesia in the Early First Stage of Labor: A Double-blind, Sequential Dose-Finding Study.
Shen, T; Shen, Y; Xu, T; Xu, Z; Zhang, C; Zheng, J, 2021
)
1.16
"Sufentanil at a dosage of 2 μg is recommended for the administration of epidural analgesia in parturients in the early first stage of labor."( The 90% Effective Dose of Sufentanil for Epidural Analgesia in the Early First Stage of Labor: A Double-blind, Sequential Dose-Finding Study.
Shen, T; Shen, Y; Xu, T; Xu, Z; Zhang, C; Zheng, J, 2021
)
2.36
" In Group D, dexmedetomidine was administrated at a dosage of 1 µg/kg/hour after induction."( The effect of ultra-fast track cardiac anaesthesia in infants and toddlers: a randomised trial.
Feng, J; Peng, L; Song, X; Wang, H, 2022
)
0.72
"The dosage of sufentanil (1."( The effect of ultra-fast track cardiac anaesthesia in infants and toddlers: a randomised trial.
Feng, J; Peng, L; Song, X; Wang, H, 2022
)
1.08
"001) and both recovery time and the dosage of propofol in the study group were significantly lower than those in the reference group (P<0."( Analysis on the effect of intravenous anesthesia with dexmedetomidine and propofol combined with seaweed polysaccharides on hemodynamics and analgesia in pregnant females undergoing painless induced abortion.
Han, Y; Liu, Z; Wu, J; Yang, L, 2021
)
0.62
" The primary endpoint was high sufentanil consumption 48 h after hepatectomy, and patients were divided into two groups: those with or without a high PCA sufentanil dosage depending on the third quartile (Q3)."( Factors affecting sufentanil consumption for intravenous controlled analgesia after hepatectomy: retrospective analysis.
Chen, G; Li, C; Liu, M; Qiao, S; Tian, L; Tian, S; Wu, Y; Zhang, W, 2021
)
1.24
" The dosage of propofol (38±9 mg) in the RM group was significantly less than that (115±15 mg) in the PR group, meanwhile the anesthesia time (8."( Gastroscopy sedation: clinical trial comparing propofol and sufentanil with or without remimazolam.
Chen, H; He, X; Xiao, N; Xiao, X; Zeng, F; Zhang, L, 2022
)
0.96
" Operation time, awakening time (time from drug withdrawal to consciousness recovery), the dosage of propofol, sufentanil, remifentanil, and intraoperative vasoactive drug dosage were recorded to compare."( Effect of ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine prior administration on hemodynamics and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair.
Cai, Z; Fu, B; Kang, Y; Li, Y; Wang, J; Wu, Y, 2022
)
0.93
" The dosage of sufentanil was 16."( Safety and efficacy of microwave ablation to treat pulmonary nodules under conscious analgosedation with sufentanil: A single-center clinical experience.
Cao, P; Kong, Y; Li, Z; Meng, W; Wang, N; Wei, Z; Xue, G; Ye, X, 2022
)
1.29
"En absence de changements cliniques ou biochimiques suggérant une aggravation de la fonction rénale, la cystatine C sérique a été mesurée par dosage immunoturbidimétrique."(
Abbasi, BA; Amaro-Estrada, I; Andreas, NS; Ariga, K; Bedrov, D; Bello, AK; Bouganim, N; Braam, B; Cao, Y; Capasso, R; Caro, AL; Chen, G; Chen, Y; Clark, MK; Cossio-Bayugar, R; Dong, D; Gao, D; Gao, T; Ghimire, A; Gul, F; Hamonic, LN; He, Y; Hill, JP; Hollebeek, LD; Hu, B; Iqbal, J; Jardan, YAB; Jiang, M; Jindal, K; John, B; Khan, I; Khan, M; Klarenbach, S; Kumar, V; Li, J; Li, L; Li, Z; Lin, H; Liu, C; Liu, HF; Liu, J; Liu, L; Liu, Z; Ma, R; Mach, T; Mahmood, T; Marath, U; Mathew, D; Mei, C; Muneer, S; Nakamura, J; Ni, H; Okpechi, IG; Padwal, R; Qi, A; Qin, Y; Renjitha, M; Ringrose, J; Scott-Douglas, N; Shahbaz, A; Shi, L; Shojai, S; Singh, SK; Slabu, D; Song, Y; Srivastava, RK; Sultana, N; Takeyasu, K; Tang, SS; Thompson, S; Tinwala, MM; Trinh, E; Valappil, SP; Wang, L; Wang, T; Wang, Y; Wu, W; Xi, H; Yang, M; Yang, Y; Ye, F; Yin, G; Yin, M; Yin, X; Yuan, XS; Zaidi, D; Zeng, L; Zhang, L; Zhang, Z; Zhang, ZC; Zheng, D, 2022
)
0.72
" The other aim included the average blood pressure, heart rate, surgical pleth index, and bispectral index values fluctuation during the intraoperative period of expanding the medullary cavity, the sufentanil, and remifentanil consumption during the operation, the amount of time the patients stayed in the Postanesthesia Care Unit, the 8 hours, 16 hours, and 24 hours total dosage of oxycodone, the resting and exercise Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores at 8 hours, 16 hours, and 24 hours after surgery, postoperative adverse events, and safety."( Ultrasound-Guided Oblique Sagittal Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Chen, L; Li, H; Ruan, B; Wang, M; Wang, N; Ye, W; Ying, T, 2022
)
0.91
" CYP3A4∗1G and OPRM1 A118G gene polymorphisms as well as sedation and pain scores at different time points after surgery were compared between the two groups of patients to analyze the relationship between the degree of pain and dosage of sufentanil and to analyze the effect of gene polymorphisms on the occurrence of adverse reactions."( Significance of CYP3A4∗1G and OPRM1 A118G Polymorphisms in Postoperative Sufentanil Analgesia in Women of Different Ethnicities.
Huang, Z; Pan, F; Wang, T; Xiao, Z; Zhang, C; Zhao, Y; Zheng, Q, 2022
)
1.14
"The dosage of sufentanil can be effectively reduced by ultrasound-directed rhomboid intercostal block and erector spinae plane block within 24 hours after VATS surgery, and pain can be relieved effectively within 24 hours by comparing with serratus plane block."( Comparison of Rhomboid Intercostal Block, Erector Spinae Plane Block, and Serratus Plane Block on Analgesia for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Deng, W; Jiang, CW; Liu, F; Wu, XP; Zhang, JG, 2022
)
1.08
" The cumulative dosage of sufentanil in perioperative period was significantly lower (149."( Effect of lidocaine perioperative infusion on chronic postsurgical pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical pneumonectomy.
Ding, H; Lian, C; Lu, Y; Shangguan, W; Shao, C; Shi, J; Wang, N; Wu, J, 2022
)
1.02
" The authors sought to provide evidence through a retrospective data analysis that helps investigate the relationship between intraoperative opioid dosage and postoperative lactic acidosis after cardiac surgery."( Sufentanil: a risk factor for lactic acidosis in patients after heart valve surgery.
Ge, YP; Jiang, W; Luo, TG; Pan, YC; Shi, Q; Xiao, ZH; Zhan, YF; Zheng, BS, 2022
)
2.16
" The rate of lactic acid decline was significantly faster in the group with a higher sufentanil dosage than in the lower group."( Sufentanil: a risk factor for lactic acidosis in patients after heart valve surgery.
Ge, YP; Jiang, W; Luo, TG; Pan, YC; Shi, Q; Xiao, ZH; Zhan, YF; Zheng, BS, 2022
)
2.39
"Comparison of cumulated dosage of sufentanil, times of effective press and rescue analgesia at 48 hours after operation: Group H was significantly lower than Group M, Group L, and Group C (P < ."( Effects of esketamine on analgesia and postpartum depression after cesarean section: A randomized, double-blinded controlled trial.
Chen, Q; Ling, B; Lv, J; Wang, W; Xu, H; Yu, W, 2022
)
1
" Compared with the control group, the total dosage of propofol in the experimental group was significantly lower, and the number of vasoactive drugs, the incidence of respiratory depression and bronchospasm were significantly lower (P < ."( Low dose of esketamine combined with propofol in painless fibronchoscopy in elderly patients.
Chen, Z; Du, T; Feng, Y; Wang, J, 2022
)
0.72
"Anterior QLB at the L2 level can reduce the perioperative dosage of sufentanil and the degree of postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, but it did not improve postoperative recovery quality and anesthesia satisfaction."( Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block at the L2 Level in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial.
He, Y; Huang, M; Ni, H; Yu, Z; Zhang, X; Zhong, Q, 2022
)
0.96
" The dosing of sufentanil was determined by the assessor when the NRS score was 1 to 3 points."( Could C3, 4, and 5 Nerve Root Block be a Better Alternative to Interscalene Block Plus Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Midshaft and Medial Clavicle Fractures? A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Gu, C; Han, J; Shan, Y; Wang, A; Xie, Y; Xu, Y, 2023
)
1.26
" The sufentanil 5 µg/kg dosage in the PCA regimen is superior to sufentanil 4 µg/kg alone or combined with tramadol in lowering moderate to severe pain."( Effectiveness of Sufentanil-Based Patient-Controlled Analgesia Regimen in Children and Incidence of Adverse Events Following Major Congenital Structure Repairs.
Liu, F; Xie, D; Zuo, Y, 2023
)
1.76
" However, the optimal dosage of opioids needed to initiate and maintain epidural labor analgesia in different phases during the first labor stage has rarely been studied."( ED90 of Sufentanil in Epidural Initiation for Labor Analgesia in Latent Phase and Active Phase During the First Labor Stage.
An, XH; Bian, Y; Shen, T; Shen, Y; Xu, T; Xu, Z; Zheng, J, 2023
)
1.34
" The dosage of sufentanil, the number of remedial analgesia, and the incidence of nausea and vomiting within 48 h after surgery were compared between the two groups; rest and motion visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 2 (T1), 8 (T2), 12 (T3), 24 (T4), and 48 (T5) h after surgery were observed; the quality of recovery-15 scale (QoR-15) at 24 and 48 h after surgery were evaluated."( [Analgesic effect of buccal acupuncture on patients after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized controlled trial].
Li, N; Liu, GS; Meng, RX; Wang, PS, 2023
)
1.26
" Secondary study indicators will include (1) visual analog scale (VAS) score and HAMD-17 score prior to surgery, immediately after entering the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days after surgery; (2) Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days after surgery; (3) consumed doses of sufentanil and esketamine after surgery; (4) postoperative analgesia pump effective press times, rescue analgesia times, and rescue drug dosage, recording the number of rescue analgesia and rescue drug dosage at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after the patient enters the PACU; (5) postoperative complications and adverse events; (6) postoperative hospital stay; (7) concentrations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNP), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and interleukin-6, at 1, 3, and, 5 days post-surgery; and (8) the patient survival rate at 6 and 12 months post-surgery."( Effect of postoperative application of esketamine on postoperative depression and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial protocol.
Gan, S; Pan, Q; Song, Z; Yang, Q; Yang, S; Yin, Y; Yu, K; Zhang, B; Zuo, X, 2023
)
1.08
" In addition, compared with saline group, the dosage of sufentanil in lidocaine group decreased significantly during the test."( Intravenous Lidocaine Decreased the Median Effective Concentration of Sufentanil for Tracheal Intubation in Obese Patients.
He, C; Jia, D; Tu, F; Yuan, X, 2023
)
1.39
" The patient's general condition, vital signs at different times, the dosage of propofol (mg) and additional times, complications, duration of gastroscopy (minute), awakening time (minute), residence time in the resuscitation room (minute), and adverse reactions were recorded."( The study of different dosages of remazolam combined with sufentanil and propofol on painless gastroscopy: A randomized controlled trial.
Dong, S; Tian, Y; Wu, W; Wu, X; Zeng, L; Zhang, T, 2023
)
1.15
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (4)

RoleDescription
opioid analgesicA narcotic or opioid substance, synthetic or semisynthetic agent producing profound analgesia, drowsiness, and changes in mood.
mu-opioid receptor agonistA compound that exhibits agonist activity at the mu-opioid receptor.
anaesthesia adjuvantAny substance that possesses little anaesthetic effect by itself, but which enhances or potentiates the anaesthetic action of other drugs when given at the same time.
intravenous anaestheticnull
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (4)

ClassDescription
piperidines
thiophenesCompounds containing at least one thiophene ring.
anilideAny aromatic amide obtained by acylation of aniline.
etherAn organooxygen compound with formula ROR, where R is not hydrogen.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (1)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
Sufentanil Action Pathway3111

Protein Targets (7)

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Solute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)19.36000.21005.553710.0000AID1526751
ATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)4.50000.00022.318510.0000AID679130
Delta-type opioid receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.00230.00030.38877.0000AID150396
Mu-type opioid receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.00140.00010.887410.0000AID150396; AID1576134
Mu-type opioid receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki0.00020.00000.38458.6000AID151590
Kappa-type opioid receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.00230.00050.36987.0000AID150396
Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Cavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)IC50 (µMol)2.07700.00202.123310.0000AID1576132
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Mu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.00140.00000.32639.4000AID1573395; AID1573397
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (59)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
serotonin transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
establishment or maintenance of transmembrane electrochemical gradientSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
quaternary ammonium group transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
epinephrine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
serotonin uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
metanephric proximal tubule developmentSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
purine-containing compound transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic cation transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
(R)-carnitine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
acyl carnitine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
cellular detoxificationSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
G2/M transition of mitotic cell cycleATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phospholipid translocationATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
terpenoid transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of response to osmotic stressATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ceramide translocationATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of anion channel activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
carboxylic acid transmembrane transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic detoxification by transmembrane export across the plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of chloride transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sensory perceptionMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of painMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor signaling pathwayMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to ethanolMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neurogenesisMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of Wnt protein secretionMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to morphineMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cellular response to stressMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of NMDA receptor activityMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide signaling pathwayMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (38)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
acetylcholine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine:sodium symporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine:sodium symporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
secondary active organic cation transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
pyrimidine nucleoside transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
quaternary ammonium group transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
toxin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
(R)-carnitine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
carboxylic acid transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylcholine floppase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylethanolamine flippase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ceramide floppase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
floppase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
G-protein alpha-subunit bindingMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor activityMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta-endorphin receptor activityMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activityMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
morphine receptor activityMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G-protein beta-subunit bindingMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide bindingMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (19)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
lateral plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
presynapseSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
endosomeMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
axonMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
perikaryonMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synapseMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (86)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1526835Unbound Cmax in human at 0.615 mg, po dosed as repeated dose2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID131732Analgesic activity using mouse hot plate technique at 55 degree Centigrade1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID26789Partition coefficient (logP)1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 29, Issue:11
Synthetic 1,4-disubstituted-1,4-dihydro-5H-tetrazol-5-one derivatives of fentanyl: alfentanil (R 39209), a potent, extremely short-acting narcotic analgesic.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID444050Fraction unbound in human plasma2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1526836Unbound maximal portal vein concentration of in human at 0.615 mg, po dosed as repeated dose2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID781328pKa (acid-base dissociation constant) as determined by Luan ref: Pharm. Res. 20052014Pharmaceutical research, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID8002Observed volume of distribution2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID444052Hepatic clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID444051Total clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID127629Duration of analgesic effect using mouse hot plate assay1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID1526843Ratio of unbound maximal portal vein concentration in human at 0.615 mg, po dosed as single dose to inhibition of human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in ASP+ substrate uptake by microplate reader based analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID444056Fraction escaping gut-wall elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID150412In vitro affinity to displace [3H]naloxone from opiate receptor in freshly prepared rat brain homogenates1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 32, Issue:5
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of 4,4-disubstituted piperidines.
AID1526839Cmax in human at 0.615 mg, po dosed as single dose2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1526752Passive membrane permeability by LC-MS/MS analysis based PAMPA2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID311367Permeability coefficient in human skin2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 15, Issue:22
Transdermal penetration behaviour of drugs: CART-clustering, QSPR and selection of model compounds.
AID134893Dose required to produce loss of righting (LOR) in anesthetic mouse1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 32, Issue:5
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of 4,4-disubstituted piperidines.
AID1526838Ratio of unbound maximal portal vein concentration in human at 0.615 mg, po dosed as repeated dose to inhibition of human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in ASP+ substrate uptake by microplate reader based analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID150396Displacement of [3H]nalotrexone from rat-brain Opioid receptors1982Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 25, Issue:8
Potential affinity labels for the opiate receptor based on fentanyl and related compounds.
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1526841Unbound maximal portal vein concentration of in human at 0.615 mg, po dosed as single dose2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID444058Volume of distribution at steady state in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1526842Ratio of unbound Cmax in human at 0.615 mg, po dosed as single dose to inhibition of human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in ASP+ substrate uptake by microplate reader based analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID1576132Displacement of [3H]pentazocine from LAL/HA/BR guinea pig brain sigma1 receptor incubated for 90 mins by liquid scintillation counting method2019MedChemComm, Jul-01, Volume: 10, Issue:7
Affinity of fentanyl and its derivatives for the σ
AID1573395Agonist activity at human mu opioid receptor expressed in CHO cell membranes after 1 hr by [35S]-GTPgammaS binding assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Biased Ligands of G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs): Structure-Functional Selectivity Relationships (SFSRs) and Therapeutic Potential.
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID129194Time from loss of righting (LOR) to that of righting occurance in anesthetic mouse1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 32, Issue:5
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of 4,4-disubstituted piperidines.
AID680128TP_TRANSPORTER: transepithelial transport (basal to apical) in MDR1-expressing LLC-PK1 cells2002Anesthesiology, Apr, Volume: 96, Issue:4
Interaction of morphine, fentanyl, sufentanil, alfentanil, and loperamide with the efflux drug transporter P-glycoprotein.
AID151590Ability to displace [3H]naloxone from the Opioid receptor mu 1 isolated from the rat brain membranes.1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID73902Inhibition of electrically evoked contraction in guinea pig ileum determined in vitro1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 34, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and pharmacological evaluation of ultrashort- to long-acting opioid analgetics.
AID177922Analgesic effect calculated using in vivo rat tail withdrawal assay.1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 34, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and pharmacological evaluation of ultrashort- to long-acting opioid analgetics.
AID174621Duration of analgesic effect calculated using in vivo rat tail withdrawal assay.1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 34, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and pharmacological evaluation of ultrashort- to long-acting opioid analgetics.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1526834Cmax in human at 0.615 mg, po dosed as repeated dose2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID444055Fraction absorbed in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID227718Binding energy by using the equation deltaG obsd = -RT ln KD1984Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 27, Issue:12
Functional group contributions to drug-receptor interactions.
AID1573396Agonist activity at human mu opioid receptor expressed in CHO cell membranes after 1 hr by [35S]-GTPgammaS binding assay relative to control2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Biased Ligands of G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs): Structure-Functional Selectivity Relationships (SFSRs) and Therapeutic Potential.
AID1576134Displacement of [3H]DAMGO from rat brain mu opioid receptor incubated for 60 mins by microbeta scintillation counting method2019MedChemComm, Jul-01, Volume: 10, Issue:7
Affinity of fentanyl and its derivatives for the σ
AID425653Renal clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID425652Total body clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID129036Duration of analgesic activity in a standard mouse hot plate assay; 6-15 min1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 32, Issue:5
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of 4,4-disubstituted piperidines.
AID23713Apparent coefficient between octanol and water, measured at 25 degree centigrades, at pH 7.41986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 29, Issue:11
Synthetic 1,4-disubstituted-1,4-dihydro-5H-tetrazol-5-one derivatives of fentanyl: alfentanil (R 39209), a potent, extremely short-acting narcotic analgesic.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID679130TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Digoxin transepithelial transport (basal to apical) (Digoxin: 5 uM) in Caco-2 cells2002Anesthesiology, Apr, Volume: 96, Issue:4
Interaction of morphine, fentanyl, sufentanil, alfentanil, and loperamide with the efflux drug transporter P-glycoprotein.
AID1573397Agonist activity at human mu opioid receptor expressed in human U2OS cells co-transfected with beta-arrestin-2 assessed as increase in beta-arrestin-2 recruitment after 90 mins by BRET assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Biased Ligands of G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs): Structure-Functional Selectivity Relationships (SFSRs) and Therapeutic Potential.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1526733Substrate activity at human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as increase in compound uptake at 0.5 uM incubated for 2 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis relative to control empty vector transfected cells2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID444057Fraction escaping hepatic elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1573398Agonist activity at human mu opioid receptor expressed in human U2OS cells co-transfected with beta-arrestin-2 assessed as increase in beta-arrestin-2 recruitment after 90 mins by BRET assay relative to control2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Biased Ligands of G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs): Structure-Functional Selectivity Relationships (SFSRs) and Therapeutic Potential.
AID1526837Ratio of unbound Cmax in human at 0.615 mg, po dosed as repeated dose to inhibition of human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in ASP+ substrate uptake by microplate reader based analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID25830Partition coefficient was measured at 25 degree centigrades1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 29, Issue:11
Synthetic 1,4-disubstituted-1,4-dihydro-5H-tetrazol-5-one derivatives of fentanyl: alfentanil (R 39209), a potent, extremely short-acting narcotic analgesic.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID7783Unbound fraction (plasma)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1526731Substrate activity at human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as increase in compound uptake at 0.05 uM incubated for 2 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis relative to control empty vector transfected cells2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID177756Analgesic activity at 1 min following injection at 1 mg/kg into the lateral tail vein of the rat (55 degree Centigrade hot plate assay)1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 34, Issue:2
New 1-(heterocyclylalkyl)-4-(propionanilido)-4-piperidinyl methyl ester and methylene methyl ether analgesics.
AID250135Inhibition of compound against MES-SA/DX5 cell line was determined using P-glycoprotein assay2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-21, Volume: 48, Issue:8
A pharmacophore hypothesis for P-glycoprotein substrate recognition using GRIND-based 3D-QSAR.
AID444054Oral bioavailability in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID26362Ionization constant (pKa)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID1526751Inhibition of human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in ASP+ substrate uptake by microplate reader based analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID1526732Substrate activity at human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as increase in compound uptake at 0.1 uM incubated for 2 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis relative to control empty vector transfected cells2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID444053Renal clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID128340Analgesic activity in a standard mouse hot plate assay1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 32, Issue:5
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of 4,4-disubstituted piperidines.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1526840Unbound Cmax in human at 0.615 mg, po dosed as single dose2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID1346400Rat mu receptor (Opioid receptors)1988Neuropharmacology, Apr, Volume: 27, Issue:4
Comparative binding of mu and delta selective ligands in whole brain and pons/medulla homogenates from rat: affinity profiles of fentanyl derivatives.
AID1346364Human mu receptor (Opioid receptors)2011Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP, Apr, Volume: 59, Issue:3
Uniform assessment and ranking of opioid μ receptor binding constants for selected opioid drugs.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (2,022)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-1990267 (13.20)18.7374
1990's598 (29.57)18.2507
2000's442 (21.86)29.6817
2010's430 (21.27)24.3611
2020's285 (14.09)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 72.40

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index72.40 (24.57)
Research Supply Index8.04 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.82 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index129.61 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (72.40)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials956 (44.34%)5.53%
Reviews99 (4.59%)6.00%
Case Studies158 (7.33%)4.05%
Observational31 (1.44%)0.25%
Other912 (42.30%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (225)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
The Effects of Sufentanil or Morphine Added to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Spinal Anaesthesia for Elective Caesarean Section [NCT03386630]Phase 466 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-28Completed
A Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Study Comparing Three Different Anesthesic Techniques for Pregnant Women in Labour: Dural Puncture Epidural, Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural. Evaluation of the Pain Control and the Hypotension Incidence [NCT05196256]Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-30Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Sufentanil, Fentanyl and Remifentanil in Combination With Midazolam During Bronchoscopy Under Conscious Sedation: A Randomized Double-blind Prospective Study [NCT03901716]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-15Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Sufentanil Combined With Midazolam in Bronchoscopy Under Conscious Sedation: Retrospective Study [NCT03890094]11,158 participants (Actual)Observational2018-01-01Completed
Effect of Rematazolam Besylate, Propofol, and Sevoflurane Perioperative Sedation on Incidence of Emergence Agitation and Hemodynamics in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery [NCT05624424]Phase 41,317 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-15Not yet recruiting
Determination of Sufentanil in Breast Milk of Puerpera During Analgesia [NCT03764202]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
Intraoperative Sublingual Sufentanil for Acute Pain in the Ambulatory Surgery Center [NCT04387136]Phase 453 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-14Completed
Sublingual Sufentanil vs Intravenous Fentanyl for Acute Pain in the Ambulatory Surgery Center [NCT04177862]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-11Completed
Efficacy of Alfentanyl Versus Sufentanyl in Children for Pain During Treatment by Tracheal Suction in an Intensive Care Unit. [NCT01235637]Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
The Randomised Epidural Analgesia in Term Delivering Women Trial [NCT01261689]488 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Determination of the 90% Effective Dose of a Sufentanil Bolus in Analgesia During Lateral Decubitus of Mechanically Ventilated Patients. [NCT01356732]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Effect of Dexmedetomidine Plus Ropivacaine Versus Sufentanil Plus Ropivacaine for Epidural Labor Analgesia on Neonatal Outcomes: a Pilot Randomized Trial [NCT05698407]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-16Recruiting
Comparison Between Epidural and Patient Controlled Analgesia on Immunological and Inflammatory Systems Following Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy [NCT01367418]Phase 326 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Randomized Double-blind Study on Efficacy of iv PCA With Fentanyl or Sufentanil in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Nephrectomy [NCT03171610]82 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-13Completed
Narcotrend Versus Bispectral Index Monitoring During Sufentanil-Midazolam Anesthesia for Bronchoscopy Under Conscious Sedation [NCT03738137]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-01Completed
Effect of Goal-directed Analgesia Using ANI (Analgesia/Nociception Index) During General Anesthesia in Children Undergoing EDAS (Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis) Surgery for Moyamoya Disease: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05672212]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-04Recruiting
Impact of Dexmedetomidine Supplemented Intravenous Analgesia on Postoperative Delirium and Long-term Outcomes in Elderly After Orthopedic Surgery: A Multicenter, Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03629262]Phase 4712 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-28Active, not recruiting
Sole Epidural Local Anesthetic Versus Opioid Plus Local Anesthetic in Epidural Labor Pain Control [NCT02036242]Phase 4500 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Intra Nasal Sufentanil Versus Intravenous Morphine for Acute Severe Traumatic Pain Analgesia in Emergency Setting. A Multicenter,Randomized,Controled, Comparative, Double Blinded Study [NCT02095366]Phase 4194 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-02Completed
A MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED STUDY OF EPIDURAL ANALGESIA FOR SEVERE ACUTE PANCREATITIS [NCT02126332]Phase 3148 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-06Completed
Pharmacokinetics of Sufentanil Sublingual Microtablet 30 mcg and 15 mcg in Healthy Subjects [NCT02082236]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Post-VATS Analgesia Between Patients With an Intrathecal Injection of Morphine and Sufentanil Versus Placebo. [NCT02152514]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Due to technical details recruitment was unreasonably slow)
Fast-track in Cardiac Surgery. Remifentanyl & Sufentanil Anaesthesia for CABG+/-AVR Evaluated by Recovery, Cognitive Dysfunction, Haemodynamics (PAC/TTE) and Cardiac Biochemical Markers (CKMB, TNT, Pro-BNP) [NCT02053818]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Ability of Pupillometry to Reduce Sufentanil Consumption in Planned Cardiac Surgery: Randomized, Controlled, Single-center Clinical Superiority Trial [NCT03864016]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-20Completed
Impact of Oral Acetaminophen Analgesia on Postoperative Delirium and Long-term Survival in Elderly Patients After Non-cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03763084]Early Phase 1164 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-15Recruiting
Thoracic Paravertebral Block: a Comparative Study of Ropivacaine With Ropivacaine and Sufentanil for Treating Pain After Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery. [NCT01082744]Phase 390 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Effect of Adding Sufentanil to Epidural Ropivacaine on Perioperative Metabolic and Stress Responses in Combined General/Epidural Anaesthesia for Geriatric Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy [NCT01086956]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Single-dose Intraoperative Methadone for Early Ambulation and Sustained Pain Control in Spinal Fusion Surgery Patients [NCT02989597]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-29Terminated(stopped due to Due to personnel loss and logistical issues the study was unable to be completed as planned.)
The Efficacy and Optimal Dose of Sufentanil in Patient Controlled Analgesia After Moderate Surgery [NCT02503826]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-31Enrolling by invitation
Effect of Epidural Opioid Administered in the First A Period on the Progress of Labour [NCT03344042]Phase 4300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-12-01Recruiting
Effect of Remimazolam and Propofol on Hemodynamic Stability During Anesthesia Induction in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting [NCT05423951]106 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-07-26Completed
Non-analgesic Effects Produced by Equipotent Analgesic Doses of Sufentanil, Hydromorphone, and Oxycodone in Female Patients Before Anesthesia Induction [NCT04396587]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-20Completed
The Impact of Sublingual Sufentanil on Postoperative Pain and Analgesic [NCT04263909]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-01Active, not recruiting
Combination of Nalbuphine and Dexmedetomidine Versus Sufentanil and Dexmedetomidine on Patients After Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study [NCT05445024]300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-01Recruiting
A Multicenter, Open-Label Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet 30 mcg in Patients With Post-Operative Pain [NCT02662556]Phase 3140 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet System For Management Of Postoperative Pain In Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway For Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04448457]72 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-01Completed
A Multicenter, Open-Label Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet 30 mcg for the Treatment of Acute Pain in Patients in Emergency Room Setting [NCT02447848]Phase 376 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
The Association Between Epidural Labor Analgesia and Pregnancy Outcomes [NCT03381495]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-16Recruiting
The Effects of Single Dose Oxycodone Versus Sufentanil on Pain and Inflammatory Response After Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Randomized Controlled Study [NCT06041425]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-07Recruiting
Comparison of Two Different Peridural During the Labor and Effect of Deambulation [NCT02264834]Phase 3164 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-01Completed
Effect of the Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion on the Quality of Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing VATS Lobectomy [NCT05930405]252 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-01Recruiting
Benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery [NCT04048070]55 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-03Completed
Comparison of Epidural Labor Analgesia With Dexmedetomidine or Sufentanil [NCT03622047]1,800 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-15Recruiting
Epidural Analgesia for Labor Pain and Infant Neurobehavior [NCT00987441]1,200 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Evaluation of the Efficacy of VR on Pain and Anxiety When Performing an Ultrasound-controlled Ankle Block. [NCT03677323]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-02Completed
"Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet System vs Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia With Morphine: Postoperative Pain Control and Its Impact in Quality of Recovery" [NCT05259098]Phase 454 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-01Completed
Throughput and Disposition Metrics When Using Dsuvia as a Bridging Medication to Decrease Time to Analgesia and Hospital Admissions in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-Occlusive Crisis That Present to the Emergency Department [NCT05388188]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-03-30Recruiting
Sublingual Sufentanil Tablet System (SSTS) Versus Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCIA) With Morphine for Postoperative Pain After Back Surgery. A Single Center Case-control Study. [NCT03036514]27 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-05Completed
Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Effect of Dexmedetomidine in Scheduled Outpatient Surgery: Single-center Prospective Randomized Double-blind Non-inferiority Study. [NCT06082856]594 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-19Recruiting
The Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Target Controlled Infusion of Propofol or Etomidate at General Anesthesia in Geriatric Patients --A Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT02111265]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-04-30Not yet recruiting
Observational Study of Analgesia and Cost-efficiency of Analgetic Medication Pumps (Zalviso and PCA-syringe Pump) After Urogenital Intervention at the Clinical Daily Routine [NCT03355352]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational2017-11-01Recruiting
Comparison of Three Different Rates of Continuous Intravenous Sufentanil Infusion for Postoperative Pain Management Following Coblation Tonsillectomy or Adeno-tonsillectomy in Children [NCT02205580]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-09-30Enrolling by invitation
Comparison of Oxycodone and Sufentanil for Analgesic Efficacy After Hip Surgery: a Prospective, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03685188]Phase 4570 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-01Enrolling by invitation
The Impact of Anesthesia on the Absorption of Glycine in Operative Hysteroscopy: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01124383]95 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Effects of Esketamine on Acute Abdominal Pain After TACE in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma:a Prospective Study TACE(Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization) [NCT05670561]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-05Recruiting
"Volatile Anesthetic Protection Of Renal Transplants: VAPOR-1-trail" [NCT01248871]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Comparison Between Sufentanil and Remifentanil as General Anesthetic Adjuvant [NCT03868111]66 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-04Completed
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Intra-nasal Sufentanil for Analgesia of Vaso-occlusive Crisis in Sickle-cell Adults. [NCT04076748]Phase 3196 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-20Recruiting
Thoracic Epidural Analgesia: Epidural Levobupivacaine and Sufentanil Versus Epidural Levobupivacaine and Intravenous Ketamine [NCT01320475]Phase 42 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty of Recruitment)
Different Anesthesia Maintain Protocol Effect the Outcome of the Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Urinary Surgery [NCT04443946]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-25Completed
The Effect of Mild Sedation and Analgesia on Radial Artery Cannulation in Novice Operators [NCT05863455]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-17Recruiting
Standardised Drug Provocation Testing in Perioperative Hypersensitivity [NCT06065137]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-31Not yet recruiting
Pain Control and Patient Satisfaction: a Dosing Study to Determine a Safe and Effective Dose of Intra-nasal Sufentanil to Treat Emergency Department Patients With Moderate to Severe Pain Due to Extremity Trauma [NCT01012999]Phase 1/Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty enrolling patients)
Interest of the Injection of Morphine, in Addition to a Local Anesthetic When Performing a Combined Spinal-epidural for Labor Analgesia [NCT02868944]Phase 3144 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Spinal Analgesia Versus Epidural Analgesia in Minor Laparotomic Liver Surgery in an Enhanced Recovery Programme: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02647047]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-31Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Fentalogs and Their Metabolites in Hair of Patients in a Monitored Clinical Context by Means of Hair Analysis [NCT05740657]225 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2022-12-06Recruiting
Precision Assessment of Perioperative Effectiveness and Safety of Transthoracic Minimally Invasive Hybrid Closure for Pediatric Ventricular Septal Defects [NCT02794584]200 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
The Application of Balanced Propofol Sedation in Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy [NCT06116955]500 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-12-01Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Intraoperative Ketamine on Opioid Consumption and Pain After Spine Surgery in Opioid-dependent Patients [NCT02085577]Phase 4147 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction During One-lung Ventilation in Elder Patients -a Single-center, Randomized ,Double-blinded and Controlled Trial [NCT02134093]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-07-31Not yet recruiting
The Safety of Administration of Sufentanil by Paramedics to Treat Pain in Acute Trauma in The Prehospital Setting: Observational Study [NCT04913402]158 participants (Actual)Observational2020-09-14Completed
Effect of Different Labour Analgesics on Maternal UtA, Fetal UA and MCA Blood Flow Index Observed by Doppler Ultrasonography:a Prospective Randomized Double-blinded Controlled Trial [NCT06099938]90 participants (Actual)Observational2021-03-01Completed
Comparison of the Hemodynamic Effect Between the Paravertebral Block and Thoracic Epidural in Esophageal Surgery With Thoracotomy . [NCT03185403]54 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Application of Esketamine in Anesthesia of Autism Children Undergoing Colonic Transendoscopic Enteral Tubing [NCT05960942]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-08-01Completed
Comparisons of Postoperative BIS Profile and Extubation Time After Valvular Heart Surgery: Remifentanil-based Propofol-supplemented Versus Sevoflurane-sufentanil Balanced Anesthesia Regimen [NCT02400879]38 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Effect of Three Doses of Sufentanil on Anesthesia Introduction and Recovery Quality in Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy [NCT04067648]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-06Completed
Perioperative Cardiovascular Protection Conservative Effects of Esketamine Versus µ-opioid Receptor Agonists in Total Intravenous General Anesthesia: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial [NCT04553536]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-02Recruiting
Analgesic Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001 After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extraction - A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Study [NCT05508594]Phase 2/Phase 3220 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-09-05Completed
A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Parallel Group Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Sufentanil Transdermal System (TDS) With Sustained-Release Morphine Sulfate in Patients With Chronic Pain Due to Cancer [NCT00943566]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to funding for project discontinued)
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus (PIEB) Compared to Continuous Epidural Infusion (CEI) Relative Efficacy and Mechanism of Efficacy For Labor Anlagesia: A Minimal Local Analgesic Concentration (MLAC) Study [NCT02573597]Phase 431 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty in recruitment)
Effect of Dexmedetomidine Combined With Sufentanil for Postoperative Intravenous Analgesia in Neurosurgery: A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT02552459]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Recruiting
Stress, Anxiety and Type A Personality and Analgesics. Impact on Induction Time and Consumption of Analgesics During Cardiac Surgery [NCT02756598]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Coupled With PCEA (PIEB-PCEA) Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion Coupled With PCEA (CEI-PCEA) for Labor Analgesia in Nulliparous: Effects on Labor Outcomes [NCT01856166]300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-06-30Recruiting
Recovery Profiles of Remifentanil-based vs. Sevoflurane-sufentanil Combined Regimen for Cardiac Surgery [NCT02712528]Phase 443 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Analgesia Postoperatoria Mediante Catetere Perdurare e Analgesia Postoperatoria Mediante Infusione Continua Periferia Nell'Intervento Chirurgico Per Riparazione Chirurgica di Aneurismi Dell'Aorta Addominale: Tecniche a Confronto [NCT02677532]Phase 451 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
[NCT02799797]62 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Laparoscopic Surgery and Abdominal Compliance Factors Including Neuromuscular Blocking Agents [NCT02816567]Phase 4180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-31Recruiting
[NCT02741219]Phase 4225 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
Effects of Epidural Labor Analgesia With Esketamine on the Incidence of Postpartum Depression and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Parturients With Prenatal Depression [NCT05826327]Phase 4364 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-01Recruiting
An Open-Label Functionality, Safety, and Efficacy Study of the NanoTab® Delivery System/ARX-F01 15 Mcg in Patients Undergoing Elective Unilateral Knee Replacement [NCT00859313]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic Modeling of the Postoperative Pain Sensation During Patient-controlled Analgesia With Target-controlled Infusion of Hydromorphone, Taking Into Account the Interaction With Intraoperatively Administered Sufentanil for Electi [NCT01490268]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study for the Evaluation of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of ARX-F02 Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Cancer Breakthrough Pain [NCT00833040]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Lidocaine Combined With Sufentanil for Preventing Catheter-related Bladder Discomfort After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: a Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial [NCT05957653]Phase 4140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-07Not yet recruiting
the Effect of Different Drugs and Infusion Ways on Degree of Comfort for Patients Undergoing Spinal Neoplasm Surgery [NCT04111328]Phase 4600 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-08Completed
Single-institution Case-series Analysis on the Addition of the Sufentanil NanoTab PCA System/15 mcg (Zalviso™) to a Multimodal Analgesic Regimen in Vertebral Surgery: A Preliminary Investigation [NCT03459404]17 participants (Actual)Observational2018-09-19Completed
Analgesia Effects of Nalbuphine vs Sulfentanil in Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section [NCT02604797]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-31Not yet recruiting
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Third Trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy Analgesia : a Randomized Study. [NCT02563821]Phase 337 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-05Completed
Effects of Sufentanil on the Intraoperative Hemodynamic Parameters in Patients Undergoing Extracranial-intracranial Bypass Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT06091904]92 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-24Recruiting
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Fentanyl, Sufentanil and Butorphanol After Remifentanil Anesthesia in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgeries [NCT00738192]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Plasmatic Catecholamines After Neuraxial Labor Analgesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Epidural Versus Combined Spinal-epidural [NCT02666794]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-12Completed
Whether Dexmedetomidine Can Improve the Prognosis of Elderly Patients With Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction [NCT02923128]Phase 4240 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Completed
Influence of Intraoperative Analgesia (Sufentanil Administered According to the Usual Criteria or Remifentanil Administered by a Closed-loop System Using Bispectral Index as the Controller) on the Postoperative Morphine Consumption [NCT00772616]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Comparison of the Effects of Atropine on Haemodynamics and Tissue Oxygenation in Anaesthesia With Propofol and Sufentanil Versus Propofol and Remifentanil [NCT01871935]70 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-06-30Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Opioid-free Anesthesia With Propofol Combined With S-ketamine in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Non-inferiority Clinical Study (SKOF - LC) [NCT05242081]980 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-31Recruiting
Comparative Effect of Etomidate and Propofol on Major Complications After Abdominal Surgery in Elderly Patients [NCT02910206]1,917 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-15Completed
Use of Ultiva ® Associated With Xylocaine ® in the Procedures of Feticide: A Phase III Randomized Trial [NCT02597699]Phase 366 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-18Completed
Different Lipid Soluble Opioids for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery Postoperative Patient-controlled Analgesia --- a Double Blind Randomized Study [NCT01917045]180 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Large-scale Prospective Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Pecs II Block for Breast Surgery: Effect on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption [NCT02544282]Phase 4140 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
The Effects of Sufentanil-remimazolam vs. Remifentanil-remimazolam Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy - A Randomized, Controlled Study- [NCT05785234]66 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-30Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of ARX-F01 Sublingual Sufentanil in Patients Undergoing Elective Unilateral Total Knee Replacement [NCT00612534]Phase 294 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Phase III Study of the Addition of Sufentanil to Interscalene Block in Shoulder Surgery [NCT01025102]Phase 326 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A Pilot Study Assessing the Effects of Sublingual Sufentanil 30 µg on Postoperative Recovery From Ambulatory Surgery [NCT04561375]Phase 461 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-11Terminated(stopped due to For practical reasons of slow enrollment)
Comparison of Intubation Conditions After Induction With Propofol Associated With a Dose of Remifentanil or Sufentanil in Surgical Tooth Extraction. [NCT01910285]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Patients Undergoing On-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery With Crystalloid Cardioplegic Arrest [NCT01406678]Phase 2/Phase 31,204 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Acute Severe Traumatic Pain in the ED : Can we Improve Time to Pain-relief With a Single Dose of Intranasal Sufentanil Given at Triage ? A Randomized Double-blinded Placebo Controlled Study (InSPEED Study) [NCT01954368]Phase 4144 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Randomized Control Trial Evaluating the Utility of Multimodal Opioid-free Anesthesia on Return of Bowel Function in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery [NCT04144933]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-15Recruiting
Epidural Dexamethasone for Labor Analgesia: the Effects on Ropivacaine Consumption and Labour Outcome. A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Study [NCT02857465]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to French Agency for the Safety of Health Products refusal)
Nasal Administration of Sufentanil+Ketamine for Procedure-related Pain in Children [NCT01047241]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
The Effect of Desflurane on Myocardial Function in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting [NCT02213718]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-07-31Recruiting
Effects of Remote Ischemic PreConditioning in Off-pump Versus On-pump Coronary [NCT01608984]Phase 1100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-05-31Recruiting
Long-term Outcome After Radical Lymph Node Dissection of Malignant Melanoma. Comparison Between Regional Versus General Anesthesia With Respect to Impact of Perioperative Immunoediting and Validation of New Potential Predictive Biomarkers [NCT01588847]230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-03-31Recruiting
The Effect of Intranasal Sufentanil on Acute Posttraumatic Pain. A Randomized Study. [NCT04137198]Phase 4170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-22Recruiting
Pain Management During Labor: Use of Intermittent Drug Delivery Devices for Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Improvement and Health-care Burden Reduction [NCT02710877]671 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-23Terminated(stopped due to Stopped funding by Regional Healthcare System.)
Effect of Oxycodone Combined With Ultrasound Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients With Lung Cancer Undergoing Thoracoscopic Surgery [NCT05742256]Phase 1159 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-01Not yet recruiting
Cerebral NIRS Profiles During Premedication for Neonatal Intubation [NCT02700893]Phase 2/Phase 328 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Does Audiovisual Distraction Decrease the Use of Hypnotic Drugs During Oocyte Retrieval? [NCT04213781]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-23Completed
Comparison of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus With Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Epidural Analgesia [NCT02873091]186 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-09-30Recruiting
Conventional Sedation Compaired With THRIVE Under General Anesthesia in Endotracheal Intubation by Fiberbronchoscope in Patients With Difficult Airways,A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04924621]42 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-10Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of Morphine and Sufentanil for Treatment of Prehospital Traumatic Severe Acute Pain. [NCT00656773]Phase 3108 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Comparison of Two Methods of Administration of the Epidural, by Programmed Intermittent Bolus or Continuous Perfusion, on the Incidence of Cesarean Sections and Instrumented Deliveries in Primiparous Women [NCT02705872]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-08Withdrawn(stopped due to Change in guidelines)
Impact of Sufentanil on the Depth of Sedation Measured by Bispectral Index During Induction of Anaesthesia With Propofol in the Elderly - a Randomised Trial [NCT02831101]71 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Neuronale Mechanismen Der Sensorischen Reizverarbeitung in Der Narkose [NCT00434382]768 participants Interventional2002-10-31Active, not recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Patient Controlled Analgesia Using the Sublingual Sufentanil Tablet System (SSTS) in a Fast Track Rehabilitation Program After Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT04432428]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-26Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of ARX-F01 Sublingual Sufentanil in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery [NCT00718081]Phase 288 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Assessment of Fetal and Maternal Sufentanil Pharmacokinetics After Intra-amniotic Injection [NCT02962830]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-04-19Recruiting
Comparison of Intrathecal Levobupivacaine Combined With Sufentanil, Fentanyl, or Placebo for Elective Caesarean Section: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study [NCT01858090]Phase 393 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Impact on Maternal and Fetal Wellbeing and on Labor Curve of Intrathecal Clonidine Addiction for Labor Analgesia. A Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT03018171]Phase 4268 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Recruiting
Individualized Goal-directed Sufentanil Administration Versus Standard Therapy in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial. [NCT03166644]128 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-04Completed
Comparison of Intra-articular Infiltration and Gabapentin With Epidural Analgesia After Total Knee Replacement Surgery [NCT01489631]81 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
The Pharmacokinetics of Opioids and Sedative/Hypnotics During Selective Cerebral Perfusion [NCT00494598]6 participants (Actual)Observational2007-03-31Completed
The Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of Dezocine and Sufentanil in Patient-controlled Analgesia After Laryngectomy [NCT06000137]129 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-02-10Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ARX-F03 Sublingual Sufentanil/Triazolam NanoTabs™ in Patients Undergoing an Elective Abdominal Liposuction Procedure [NCT00894699]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Estimation of the ED95 of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Prilocaine 2% With Sufentanyl for Scheduled Cesarean Delivery : a Dose-finding Study Bases on the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) [NCT03036384]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Effect of Delivery Route on the Pharmacokinetics of Sufentanil NanoTab® in Healthy Subjects [NCT01639729]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Effect of Intrathecal Morphine on Urinary Bladder Function and Recovery in Patients Having a Cesarean Delivery - A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT05042817]56 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-01Completed
The Safety of Driving in Patients After Minor Surgery With Monitored Anesthesia Care [NCT00577200]Phase 4625 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-01-31Active, not recruiting
Optimizing Outpatient Anesthesia (OSPREy-Outpatient Surgery Pain Relief Enhancement) [NCT03726268]Phase 41,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-29Active, not recruiting
Intraoperative Methadone for the Prevention of Postoperative Pain: a Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Study in Orthopedic Surgery [NCT05831345]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-28Recruiting
Intranasal Sufentanil for Analgesia of Severe Sickle Cell Vaso-occlusive Pain Crisis in the Pediatric Emergency Department: a Double Blind Randomized Versus Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT06181695]Phase 3182 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-05-02Not yet recruiting
Impact of Individualized Timing of Analgesia on the Effectiveness of Labor Analgesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02920489]200 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Completed
Epidural Analgesia During Labour. Impact of Clonidine Addition to Levobupivacaine and Sufentanil [NCT00437996]Phase 385 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
The Safety and Efficacy of Long-term-opioid-free Anesthesia in Anterior Cervical Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05548465]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-20Enrolling by invitation
Comparison of Surgical Pleth Index Guided Analgesia With Standard Clinical Practise During Balanced Anesthesia [NCT01525537]82 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Pharmacokinetics of Sufentanil After Epidural Administration in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery [NCT06069219]18 participants (Actual)Observational2019-06-01Completed
Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia Combined With Different Opioid Receptors for Gastrointestinal Surgery [NCT05576675]Phase 34,342 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-01Completed
Improving Pain Management and Decreasing Length of Stay After THA and TKA: A Randomized, Patient-Blinded Comparison of Standard of Care Pain Management With and Without Sufentanil [NCT05307341]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-31Recruiting
IAP104 - Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Changes Following Concurrent Administration of Sufentanil NanoTab and Ketoconazole in Healthy Subjects [NCT01721070]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Electroencephalographic Profiles During General Anesthesia: a Comparative Study of Remimazolam and Propofol [NCT05533567]12 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-01Recruiting
Effect of Esketamine on Abdominal Pain During TACE-HAIC in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Prospective Study TACE-HAIC (Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined With Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy ) [NCT05416073]Phase 470 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-22Recruiting
Comparative Study of General Anesthesia With or Without Opioid on the Cardiac Index During Total Hip Arthroplasty [NCT05446623]Phase 2/Phase 3120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-01Recruiting
The Effect and Safety of the Four Points Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Under the Ultrasound Guidance in Postoperative Analgesia to the Hepatectomy [NCT03598192]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-15Completed
Comparison of Intratechal Low-Dose Levobupivacaine With Levobupivacaine-Fentanyl and Levobupivacaine-Sufentanil Combinations for Cesarean Section [NCT02430090]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
The Ultrasound-guided Multiple-injection Costotransverse Block for Mastectomy and Primary Reconstructive Surgery. A Double Blind, Randomised, Placebo Controlled Trial. [NCT04248179]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-29Completed
[NCT01608334]56 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Analgesics in the Pre-hospital Setting: Implications on Hemorrhage Tolerance - Sufentanil [NCT04959812]Phase 1/Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-01Active, not recruiting
Effect of Epidural Analgesia on the Parameter ANI During Childbirth [NCT01505283]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Terminated(stopped due to recruitment difficulties)
Whether Opioids Are Factor That Induced Postoperative Delirium? [NCT05596071]130 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-25Completed
Continuous Right Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Postoperative Pain After Right Lobe Hepatectomy [NCT01691937]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Safety and Feasibility Study of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol in Patients Undergoing Elective Pancreaticoduodenectomy. [NCT01759706]123 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Phase IV Study of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Anesthesia Induction With Single Dose Sufentanil for Open Abdominal Surgery Under Continuous Remifentanil Anesthesia Versus Total Intravenous Remifentanil Anesthesia [NCT01777100]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Cisatracurium Infusion and Sufentanil Consumption and Its Variations in Different Age Groups, Using a Closed Loop Computer Controlled System. [NCT01785446]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-11-30Recruiting
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Second Trimester Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy Analgesia: a Randomized Study. [NCT01860521]104 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Opioid Free Anesthesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Randomized, Controlled and Triple-blind Clinical Trial [NCT05072704]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-02-03Completed
the Effect of Adding Sufentanyl to Bupivacaine in Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Under the Guide of Ultrasound to Reduce the Narcotic Dosage, Side Effects and Pain in the First 24 Hours After Cesarean Delivery [NCT01516268]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Usability and Satisfaction Evaluation of Sufentanil Sublingual Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Elective Surgery With Moderate-to-Severe Postoperative Pain [NCT03373851]119 participants (Actual)Observational2018-06-25Completed
The Effect of Dexmedetomidine Combined With Low-dose Nalmefene on Preventing Remifentanil-induced Postoperative Hyperalgesia in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Surgery [NCT03096730]150 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-06Completed
Effect of Intraoperative Intravenous Lidocaine on the Quality of Recovery Following Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection [NCT05750056]Phase 4234 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-24Not yet recruiting
The Application of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Plus Rectus Sheath Block in Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement and Analgesia Based on Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Combined With κ Receptor Agonist and NSAID(Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Dru [NCT02984865]190 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-20Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Multimodal Analgesia Used in Patients With Microvascular Decompression [NCT03152955]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-15Active, not recruiting
Comparison of the Effects of Esketamine, Sufentanil, or Lidocaine Combined With Propofol on Tussis Reflection During Upper Gastroscopy: a Randomised, Two Centre, Three-blind, Controlled Trial [NCT05497492]400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-05Recruiting
Effect of Mini-dose Esketamine-dexmedetomidine Supplemented Analgesia on Long-term Outcomes Following Scoliosis Correction Surgery: 2-year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05718544]Phase 4199 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-01-30Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Two Analgesic Strategies After Scheduled Caesarean : Block of the Lumbar Region With Ropivacaine Versus Intrathecal Morphine [NCT04755712]Phase 4104 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-22Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Parallel-group Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Resource Utilization of a Remifentanil/Propofol Analgesia/Sedation Regimen Versus a Sufentanil/Propofol Analgesia/Sedation Regimen in Mechanically Ventilated I [NCT00421720]Phase 4164 participants Interventional2007-01-31Terminated
Comparison the Effect of Lidocaine (With Epinephrine) With and Without Sufentanil on the Rate of Anesthesia of Intra-ligamentary Injection in Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis [NCT01572116]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Treatment of Acute Post-operative Pain in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colon Resections [NCT03403842]159 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-01Recruiting
Suboxone User Perioperative Early Referral and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery- Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery Population [NCT04464512]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-10Withdrawn(stopped due to No qualified enrollments; study cancelled due to pandemic)
Effect of Butorphanol Combined With Flurbiprofen Axetil on Preventing Postoperative Hyperalgesia Induced by Remifentanil in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdomimal Surgery [NCT02043366]180 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
The Effect of Combination of Dexmedetomidine and Sufentanil in Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia on Pediatric Patients Undergoing Scoliosis Surgery [NCT05249153]84 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-23Recruiting
Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Minimal Invasive Nuss Repair of Pectus Excavatum: a Randomized Clinical Trial (ICE Trial) [NCT05731973]46 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-31Not yet recruiting
the Safety and Effectiveness of the Effects on the Perioperative Pain Control Comparing Between the Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block Using the Camera Guided and the Intrathoracic Intercostals Nerve Block for the Management of Nonintubated Local Regional [NCT03086213]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-01Completed
Real-time Decision Support for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Prophylaxis [NCT02625181]27,034 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
A Multicenter, Open-Label Trial to Evaluate the Overall Performance of the Zalviso System™ (Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet System) 15 mcg [NCT02662764]Phase 3320 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-28Completed
Effects of Combined Spinal-epidural Analgesia During Labor on Postpartum Electrophysiological Function of Maternal Pelvic Floor Muscle: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02334150]Phase 2/Phase 3308 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Relationship Between General Anesthetic Mode and Postoperative Severe Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Complications: a Retrospective Cohort Study [NCT03335579]50,000 participants (Actual)Observational2016-12-31Completed
Comparison of Intranasal Sufentanil Versus Intravenous Morphine for the Management of Acute Pain [NCT03224039]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-01Recruiting
Bioavailability Study of Intranasal CT001 in Healthy Volunteers [NCT04807335]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-17Completed
Impact of Opioids on Heart Rate During Rapid Sequence Intubation: Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study [NCT05384665]3 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-05-16Terminated(stopped due to rate of inclusion too low)
Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Stress Response in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery During Perioperative Anesthesia and Its Correlation With Serum Orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) [NCT05899127]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-22Recruiting
Comparison of an Opioid-Free Anesthesia Protocol Versus Standard Practices on Early and Late Post-operative Recovery [NCT04797312]Phase 3140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-12Recruiting
Comparison of Intrathecal Morphine, Epidural Bupivacaine With Sufentanil and Systemic Patient Controlled Analgesia With Morphine for Analgesia After Colorectal Surgery: Prospective Randomised Study. [NCT03007121]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-10Completed
[NCT01710345]Phase 2101 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
Comparison of Effects of Oxycodone and Sufentanil on Cardiovascular Stress Induced by Tracheal Intubation in the Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Undergoing Major Noncardiac Surgery [NCT04121416]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-01Completed
Regional Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery [NCT03830086]28 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-07Completed
The Impact of an Epidural Anesthetic on the Consumption of Sevoflurane in Major Abdominal Surgery [NCT04021264]Phase 2/Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Inability to enroll participants.)
A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Trial of the Efficacy of a Bilateral Lumbar Erector Spinae Block on the 24h Morphine Consumption After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery. [NCT03825198]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-01Recruiting
Comparison of Remifentanil-induced Postoperative Hyperalgesia After Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery Between Patients From the Plain Area and the Plateau Area [NCT05028049]160 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2021-08-30Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Sufentanil NanoTab PCA System/15 mcg (Zalviso™) for the Treatment of Post-Operative Pain in Patients After Open Abdominal Surgery [NCT01539642]Phase 3172 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Effect of Epidural Hydromorphone Combined With Ropivacaine in Labor Analgesia [NCT05901441]Phase 2240 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-06-01Completed
Differential Effects of Remimazolam and Propofol on Dynamic Cerebral [NCT05533580]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-01Recruiting
Analgesic Effect and Safety Analysis of Nalbuphine in ARDS Patients After Surgery [NCT06037330]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Hydromorphone-ropivacaine Versus Sufentanil-ropivacaine for Epidural Labor Analgesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT06036797]Phase 2240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-17Recruiting
ANI and SPI Guided Intraoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Neurosurgical Procedures Under General Anaesthesia [NCT02490540]72 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
"Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Atropine+Propofol Versus Atropine+Atracurium+Sufentanil as a Premedication Prior to Semi-urgent or Elective Endotracheal Intubation of Term and Preterm Newborns" [NCT01490580]Phase 2/Phase 3173 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Effect of Ketamine Versus Sufentanil on Cerebral Glutamate After Traumatic Brain Injury : a Randomized, Double-blinded, Microdialysis Study [NCT02232347]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-10-31Not yet recruiting
DSUVIA Early Evaluation of PAIN (DEEP) Trial [NCT05288348]Phase 3150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-05Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Sublingual Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg for the Treatment of Post-Operative Pain in Patients After Abdominal Surgery [NCT02356588]Phase 3161 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
The Influence of Epigenetic Modification in OPRM1 on Postoperative Analgesia and Side Effect Induced by μ-opioid Receptor Agonists [NCT03135795]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-06Recruiting
Effect of Spinal or Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Neutrophil Activation After Tourniquet Induced Ischemia-reperfusion in Knee Surgery [NCT03470363]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-01Completed
Comparison of Clinical Effects of Meperidine and Sufentanil Added to 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section [NCT04446715]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-01Recruiting
Comparisons of Myocardial Injury After Using Different Anesthetics Regimens for Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Remifentanil-based Versus Sevoflurane-sufentanil Balanced Regimen [NCT02499445]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Effect of 0.5µg/ml Sufentanil and Ropivacaine Towards Pregnant Women and Fetus in Analgesia Labor [NCT02488291]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Sufentanil Infusion vs Sufentanil Bolus and Time to Extubation During Routine Cardiac Surgery [NCT04226495]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-13Completed
P3 - A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Sufentanil NanoTab® PCA System/15 mcg (Zalviso™) for the Treatment of Post-Operative Pain in Patients After Knee or Hip Replacement Surgery [NCT01660763]Phase 3419 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Low-dose S-ketamine and Dexmedetomidine in Combination With Opioids for Patient-controlled Analgesia After Scoliosis Correction Surgery: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT04791059]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-09Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of the Sufentanil NanoTab PCA System/15 mcg (Zalviso™) to Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia With Morphine for the Treatment of Acute Post-Operative Pain [NCT01539538]Phase 3357 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00612534 (1) [back to overview]SPID-12
NCT00718081 (2) [back to overview]SPID-12
NCT00718081 (2) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who Responded Very Good or Excellent in Patient Global Evaluation of Pain Relief
NCT00833040 (1) [back to overview]Time-weighted SPID30
NCT00859313 (1) [back to overview]Percent of Patients Without Device Failure
NCT00894699 (1) [back to overview]Summed Richmond Agitation Sedation Score (RASS) Over the 4-hour Study Period (SRS-4)
NCT01012999 (1) [back to overview]Pain Relief at Thirty Minutes
NCT01047241 (6) [back to overview]Acceptance of Intranasal Administration
NCT01047241 (6) [back to overview]Procedural Pain Intensity Score
NCT01047241 (6) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Plasma Concentrations (Tmax) Sufentanil and Ketamine
NCT01047241 (6) [back to overview]Sedation Score (UMSS)
NCT01047241 (6) [back to overview]Bioavailability of Sufentanil and Ketamine
NCT01047241 (6) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sufentanil and Ketamine
NCT01490580 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients Surviving Without Ages and Stages Questionnaire Score Below Threshold at Age 2
NCT01490580 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Intubation Procedure
NCT01490580 (8) [back to overview]Transcutaneous PCO2 (TcPCO2) Measurement
NCT01490580 (8) [back to overview]Mean Blood Pressure
NCT01490580 (8) [back to overview]Pulse Oxymetry
NCT01490580 (8) [back to overview]Heart Rate
NCT01490580 (8) [back to overview]Short Term Neurological Outcome: Worsening of Head Ultrasound
NCT01490580 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Prolonged Desaturation
NCT01516268 (1) [back to overview]Narcotic Dosage
NCT01539538 (1) [back to overview]Patient Global Satisfaction
NCT01539642 (1) [back to overview]Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 48-hour Study Period (SPID-48).
NCT01639729 (4) [back to overview]CST 1/2
NCT01639729 (4) [back to overview]AUC (0 - Inf)
NCT01639729 (4) [back to overview]Cmax
NCT01639729 (4) [back to overview]Tmax
NCT01660763 (1) [back to overview]Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 48-hour Study Period (SPID48).
NCT01710345 (1) [back to overview]SPID-12
NCT01721070 (2) [back to overview]Cmax
NCT01721070 (2) [back to overview]AUC (0-inf)
NCT01860521 (4) [back to overview]Incidence of Motor Block
NCT01860521 (4) [back to overview]Total Sufentanil Consumption.
NCT01860521 (4) [back to overview]Total Levobupivacaine Consumption
NCT01860521 (4) [back to overview]Degree of Satisfaction of the Patients With the Analgesia Procedure
NCT02043366 (2) [back to overview]Normalized Area of Hyperalgesia Around the Incision
NCT02043366 (2) [back to overview]Mechanical Hyperalgesia Threshold on the Dominant Inner Forearm
NCT02356588 (14) [back to overview]TOTPAR24
NCT02356588 (14) [back to overview]Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 12-hour Study Period (SPID12).
NCT02356588 (14) [back to overview]Time-weighted SPRID24
NCT02356588 (14) [back to overview]Time-weighted SPRID12
NCT02356588 (14) [back to overview]Summary of Number of Rescue Morphine Doses Used by Study Period in the ITT Population
NCT02356588 (14) [back to overview]Summed Pain Intensity Difference
NCT02356588 (14) [back to overview]Summary of Number of Rescue Morphine Doses Used by Study Period in the ITT Population
NCT02356588 (14) [back to overview]Summary of Number of Rescue Morphine Doses Used by Study Period in the ITT Population
NCT02356588 (14) [back to overview]TOTPAR12
NCT02356588 (14) [back to overview]Patient Global Assessment
NCT02356588 (14) [back to overview]Healthcare Professional Global Assessment
NCT02356588 (14) [back to overview]Analysis of Total Number of Doses Used During the 24-Hour Study Period in the ITT Population
NCT02356588 (14) [back to overview]Analysis of Total Number of Doses Used During the 12-Hour Study Period in the ITT Population
NCT02356588 (14) [back to overview]Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 24-hour Study Period (SPID24).
NCT02430090 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
NCT02447848 (3) [back to overview]TOTPAR1 (Time-weighted)
NCT02447848 (3) [back to overview]PI at Each Evaluation Time Point
NCT02447848 (3) [back to overview]Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 1-hour (SPID1).
NCT02573597 (8) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction With Labor Analgesia
NCT02573597 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Maternal Nausea/Vomiting
NCT02573597 (8) [back to overview]Minimum Local Analgesic Concentration (MLAC) of the Final Participants in Each Respective Group at Study Completion
NCT02573597 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Requiring Treatment for Pruritus, Nausea and Vomiting, or Hypotension
NCT02573597 (8) [back to overview]Numerical Verbal Pain Scores
NCT02573597 (8) [back to overview]Time to First Clinician Rescue Analgesia Request (From Initial Epidural Dose)
NCT02573597 (8) [back to overview]Protocol Success or Failure
NCT02573597 (8) [back to overview]Labor Outcome (Spontaneous, Assisted, Cesarean)
NCT02625181 (4) [back to overview]Adherence to PONV Guidelines
NCT02625181 (4) [back to overview]PONV Incidence: Number of Participants With Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
NCT02625181 (4) [back to overview]The Number of Prophylactic Interventions for PONV
NCT02625181 (4) [back to overview]Time to Discharge From the Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
NCT02662556 (4) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals Who Responded to the Global Assessments as Excellent or Good"
NCT02662556 (4) [back to overview]Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the First Hour (SPID1).
NCT02662556 (4) [back to overview]Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 12-hour Study Period (SPID12).
NCT02662556 (4) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Global Assessments as Excellent or Good"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Number of Study Drug Doses Used
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Nurse Usability Questionnaire (NUQ)
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Pain Intensity (PI) at Each Evaluation Time Point
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at Each Evaluation Time Point
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Pain Relief (PR) at Each Evaluation Time Point
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Patient Usability Questionnaire (PUQ)
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 48-hour Study Period (SPID-48) Study Period
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professional (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) as Excellent at 24 Hours"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professional (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) as Poor at 24 Hours"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) as Fair at 24 Hours"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Rate the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 48 Hours as Good or Excellent"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Rated the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 24 Hours as Good or Excellent"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Rated the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 72 Hours as Good or Excellent"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA )at 48 Hours as Good"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) as Good at 24 Hours"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 48 Hours as Excellent"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 48 Hours as Fair"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 48 Hours as Poor"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 72 Hours as Excellent"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 72 Hours as Fair"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 72 Hours as Good"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 72 Hours as Poor"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Rate the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 24 Hours as Good or Excellent"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Rate the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 48 Hours as Good or Excellent"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Rate the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 72 Hours as Good or Excellent"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) as Excellent at 24 Hours"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) as Fair at 24 Hours"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) as Good at 24 Hours"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) as Poor at 24 Hours"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 48 Hours as Excellent"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 48 Hours as Fair"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 48 Hours as Good"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 48 Hours as Poor"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 72 Hours as Excellent"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 72 Hours as Fair"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 72 Hours as Good"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 72 Hours as Poor"
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Average Hourly Use of Study Drug
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Number of Misplaced Tablets (i.e., Tablet Found Outside the Patient's Mouth)
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Number of Zalviso System Notifications to the Nurse to Retrain Patient to Not Pull Down on the Controller While Dosing
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Experienced at Least One System-generated Error Based on the Controller Data While Using the Zalviso System
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Either a System-generated Error or a Misplaced Tablet (i.e., a Dispense Failure)
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Either a System-generated Error or a Misplaced Tablet That Caused an Analgesic Gap
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Terminated From the Study Due to Inadequate Analgesia After the 24-hour Study Period and Prior to or During the 48 Hour Study Period
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Terminated From the Study Due to Inadequate Analgesia Over the 24-hour Study Period
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Terminated From the Study Due to Inadequate Analgesia Prior to or During the 72 Hour Study Period
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Misplaced Tablet(s)
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients, if Any, With Tablet Dispensed When the Zalviso System Was in Lockout
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients, if Any, With Tablets Dispensed But Not Requested
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 24-hour Study Period (SPID24)
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 72-hour Study Period (SPID-72) Study Period
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Total Amount of Supplemental Morphine (mg) Utilized
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Over the 24-hour Study Period (TOTPAR24)
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Over the 48-hour Study Period (TOTPAR48)
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Over the 72-hour Study Period (TOTPAR72)
NCT02662764 (56) [back to overview]Average Inter-dosing Interval (in Minutes)
NCT03036384 (14) [back to overview]Sensitive Block at End of Surgery
NCT03036384 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants Needing Vasopressors
NCT03036384 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dizziness
NCT03036384 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Nausea or Vomiting
NCT03036384 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Pruritus
NCT03036384 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Transient Neurologic Symptoms (TNS)
NCT03036384 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Urinary Retention
NCT03036384 (14) [back to overview]Number of Satisfied Participants
NCT03036384 (14) [back to overview]Success of Anesthesia
NCT03036384 (14) [back to overview]Bromage Motor Block Level at End of Surgery
NCT03036384 (14) [back to overview]Newborn Apgar Score
NCT03036384 (14) [back to overview]Sensitive Block Duration
NCT03036384 (14) [back to overview]Newborn Methemoglobinemia (MetHb)
NCT03036384 (14) [back to overview]Motor Block Duration
NCT03086213 (6) [back to overview]Comparing the Hemodynamics of the Intervention of the Each Group During the Operation
NCT03086213 (6) [back to overview]Comparing the Hemodynamics of the Intervention of the Each Group During the Operation
NCT03086213 (6) [back to overview]Comparing the Blood Gas Analysis After the Intervention of the Each Group
NCT03086213 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Puncture Related Complications
NCT03086213 (6) [back to overview]Concentration of Cortisol at Different Point During the Operation
NCT03086213 (6) [back to overview]Comparing the Inflammatory Markers During the Operation After the Intervention of the Each Group
NCT03096730 (1) [back to overview]Mechanical Hyperalgesia Threshold on the Dominant Inner Forearm
NCT04177862 (6) [back to overview]Recovery Room Time
NCT04177862 (6) [back to overview]Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
NCT04177862 (6) [back to overview]Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS)
NCT04177862 (6) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT04177862 (6) [back to overview]Rescue Milligram Morphine Equivalents (Opioid Use After Intervention Until Discharge)
NCT04177862 (6) [back to overview]Supplemental Oxygen
NCT04226495 (2) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration
NCT04226495 (2) [back to overview]Time to Extubation
NCT04387136 (3) [back to overview]Opioid Use in Recovery Room
NCT04387136 (3) [back to overview]Initial Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score Upon Arrival
NCT04387136 (3) [back to overview]OBAS Score
NCT04561375 (3) [back to overview]Total Consumption of Fentanyl in PACU
NCT04561375 (3) [back to overview]Time to Fitness for PACU Discharge
NCT04561375 (3) [back to overview]Phase 1 Recovery Time

SPID-12

SPID-12 is the sum of the pain intensity difference (PID) over the 12 hour time period. A pain intensity score of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained before starting the study and throughout the 12 hour time period. The pain score at each assessment time point is subtracted from the baseline pain score (starting point) to provide the total sum score or SPID-12. A higher SPID-12 score is better and indicates a reduction in pain intensity compared to the baseline score. Per protocol, pain scores are collected at 15 different time points. If all scores are collected, the full range of SPID-12 scores could be -150 to 150. (NCT00612534)
Timeframe: 12 hours after first dose

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sufentanil NanoTab 5 Mcg2.87
Sufentanil NanoTab 10 Mcg1.28
Sufentanil NanoTab 15 Mcg12.66
Placebo NanoTab-7.39

[back to top]

SPID-12

The primary outcome measure is the summed pain intensity difference over the 12-hour study period (SPID-12). A pain intensity score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained at baseline and throughout the 12 hour study period. The SPID-12 is calculated by summing the difference between baseline pain score and pain score at each assessment time point. The scores after summing could range from -122 to +122. A higher SPID-12 score is better. (NCT00718081)
Timeframe: 12 hours after surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sufentanil NanoTab 10 mcg22.41
Sufentanil NanoTab 15 mcg27.56
Placebo NanoTab2.93

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who Responded Very Good or Excellent in Patient Global Evaluation of Pain Relief

At the end of the 12-hour study period each patient rated their overall pain relief since starting study drug on a 5-point scale: poor, fair, good, very good or excellent. (NCT00718081)
Timeframe: Up to 12 hours after surgery

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Sufentanil NanoTab 10 mcg38
Sufentanil NanoTab 15 mcg55
Placebo NanoTab10

[back to top]

Time-weighted SPID30

time-weighted SPID30 is the sum of the pain intensity difference (PID) over the 30 minute time period. A pain intensity score of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse possible pain) is recorded at pre-dose, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes post-dose. The pain score at each assessment time through 30 minutes is subtracted from the baseline pain score to provide the total sum score or SPID30. A higher SPID30 is better and indicates a reduction in pain intensity compared to the baseline score. (NCT00833040)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after dosing

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Double Blind Phase of 7 Sufentanil Tablets59.9
Double Blind Phase of 3 Pbo Tablets42.6

[back to top]

Percent of Patients Without Device Failure

Percent of patients who completed the study without a device failure. A device failure is defined as the failure to dispense a NanoTab, dispensing more than one NanoTab, or dispensing a broken NanoTab. Device failures were monitored and reported by study staff. (NCT00859313)
Timeframe: 12 hours

Interventionpercent (Number)
Sufentanil NanoTab PCA System/15 Mcg100

[back to top]

Summed Richmond Agitation Sedation Score (RASS) Over the 4-hour Study Period (SRS-4)

The primary efficacy endpoint of the study is the sedation level as assessed by the 10-point RASS, where unarousable is graded as minus 5 (- 5) and combative is graded as plus 4 (+ 4). The RASS was assessed at 15 time points throughout the four hour study period. (NCT00894699)
Timeframe: 4 hour study period

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sublingual Sufentanil 15 mcg/Triazolam NanoTab™ 200 mcg-5.44
Placebo NanoTab™0.79

[back to top]

Pain Relief at Thirty Minutes

Measured pain relief on a visual analog scale (0-10- ten being the worst pain and zero being no pain at all). (NCT01012999)
Timeframe: 30 min post dose

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Sufentanil, Pain Relief4.3

[back to top]

Acceptance of Intranasal Administration

Asking the children (parents for preverbal children) if they would like to receive this treatment again in a similar situation rather than analgesic suppositories, tablets, oral solutions, or injections? (NCT01047241)
Timeframe: Immediately after the procedure

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Intranasal Sufentanil/Ketamine47

[back to top]

Procedural Pain Intensity Score

Children <5 years old were administered the FLACC (Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability) Scale (Range: 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain). Children >= 5 years but < 8 years old were administered the Visual analog scale modified with six faces by Wong-Baker (Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale) (Range: 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain). Children >= 8 years old were administered a Visual Analog Scale (Range: 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain). (NCT01047241)
Timeframe: Pain assessment during painful medical procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Intranasal Sufentanil/Ketamine3.1

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentrations (Tmax) Sufentanil and Ketamine

(NCT01047241)
Timeframe: Time=5-60 min after administration of investigational medicinal product

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Tmax sufentanilTmax ketamine
Intranasal Sufentanil/Ketamine13.88.5

[back to top]

Sedation Score (UMSS)

"University of Michigan Sedation Score (UMSS) (0-4, 0 awake and alert, 4 unarousable)" (NCT01047241)
Timeframe: Time= 0-70 min. after drug administration

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Intranasal Sufentanil/Ketamine0

[back to top]

Bioavailability of Sufentanil and Ketamine

(NCT01047241)
Timeframe: Time= 5-60 min after administration of the investigational medical product

Interventionpercentage bioavailable (Mean)
Bioavailability sufentanilBioavailability ketamine
Intranasal Sufentanil/Ketamine24.635.8

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sufentanil and Ketamine

(NCT01047241)
Timeframe: Time= 5-60 min after administration of the investigational medical product

Interventionmcg/L (Mean)
Cmax sufentanilCmax ketamine
Intranasal Sufentanil/Ketamine0.042102

[back to top]

Number of Patients Surviving Without Ages and Stages Questionnaire Score Below Threshold at Age 2

Survival without risk of neurodevelopmental delay. Risk of neurodevelopmental delay was defined as no Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) domain score below threshold (-2 SD) at 2 years of corrected age. The ASQ includes 30 items in 5 neurodevelopmental domains: communication abilities, gross motor skills, fine motor skills, problem solving abilities, and personal-social skills. For each domain, the score obtained by the sum of the items ranges from 0 to 60 and the overall maximum ASQ score is 300 points. For each domain, the score can be categorized using established screening thresholds: an ASQ score <-2 SD below the mean suggests a risk of neurodevelopmental delay in that domai. (NCT01490580)
Timeframe: At 2 years corrected age

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
"Atropine Atracurium Sufentanil as Treated Population"38
"Atropine Propofol as Treated Population"45

[back to top]

Duration of Intubation Procedure

Although the initial definition of procedure duration in the registered protocol was the time between the first laryngoscope insertion and last laryngoscope removal after successful intubation, the variable collected in the clinical research form was defined as the time between first laryngoscope insertion and the fixation of the tube with tape. (NCT01490580)
Timeframe: Expected duration 1 to 15 minutes

InterventionMinutes (Median)
Atropine + Propofol6.0
Atropine + Atracurium + Sufentanil3.5

[back to top]

Transcutaneous PCO2 (TcPCO2) Measurement

TcPCO2 recordings 1 minute before the first injection and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after the first injection (NCT01490580)
Timeframe: from 1 minute before to 60 minutes after the start of premedication

,
InterventionDifference in mm Hg (Mean)
TcPCO2 from t-1 to t+15TcPCO2 from t-1 to t+30
Atropine + Atracurium + Sufentanil14.116.2
Atropine + Propofol8.05.1

[back to top]

Mean Blood Pressure

Blood pressure recordings 1 minute before the first injection and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after the first injection (NCT01490580)
Timeframe: from 1 minute before to 60 minutes after the start of premedication

,
InterventionDifference in mm Hg (Mean)
Mean arterial blood pressure from t-1 to t+15Mean arterial blood pressure from t-1 to t+30
Atropine + Atracurium + Sufentanil0.2-3.3
Atropine + Propofol-6.8-9.1

[back to top]

Pulse Oxymetry

Pulse oxymetry recordings 1 minute before the first injection and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after the first injection (NCT01490580)
Timeframe: from 1 minute before to 60 minutes after the start of premedication

,
Intervention% SpO2 (Mean)
SpO2 from t-1 to t+6, Difference in %SpO2 from t-1 to t+9, Difference in %
Atropine + Atracurium + Sufentanil-12.0-15.9
Atropine + Propofol-6.0-8.7

[back to top]

Heart Rate

Heart rate recordings 1 minute before the first injection and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after the first injection (NCT01490580)
Timeframe: from 1 minute before to 60 minutes after the start of premedication

,
Interventionbpm (Mean)
Heart rate from t-1 to t+6, Difference in bpmHeart rate from t-1 to t+9, Difference in bpm
Atropine + Atracurium + Sufentanil11.511.7
Atropine + Propofol3.31.6

[back to top]

Short Term Neurological Outcome: Worsening of Head Ultrasound

Worsening of head ultrasound scans in the 7 days after intubation from the preinclusion evaluation, defined as either a normal scan before inclusion and any grade intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) afterwards, or as a preinclusion grade 1 or 2 IVH scan deteriorating to grade 3 or 4 IVH, according to Papile's classification; This analysis was not centralized but performed in each center according to its usual protocols. (NCT01490580)
Timeframe: Within 7 days after inclusion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Atropine + Propofol14
Atropine + Atracurium + Sufentanil12

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Prolonged Desaturation

"Pulse oxymetry value measured by Masimo technology below 80% for 60 seconds or more.~Duration of intubation is defined by the time between first laryngoscope insertion and last laryngoscope removal after successful intubation. Successful intubation is defined by clear bilateral breath sounds, increasing heart rate and saturation (if previously low) and appropriate flow curves on the ventilator." (NCT01490580)
Timeframe: During intubation procedure, expected duration 1 to 15 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Atropine Atracurium Sufentanil54
Atropine Propofol53

[back to top]

Narcotic Dosage

The total dosage of morphin consumed by the patients in sufentanil or control group. (NCT01516268)
Timeframe: over 24 hours after surgery

Interventionmgm,. (Mean)
Sufentanyl Group37.2
Control Group52.8

[back to top]

Patient Global Satisfaction

Proportion of patients responding good or excellent at 48-hour global assessment of method of pain control (NCT01539538)
Timeframe: 48 hours

Intervention% patients reporting good or excellent (Number)
Sufentanil NanoTab PCA System/15 mcg78.5
Morphine IV PCA65.6

[back to top]

Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 48-hour Study Period (SPID-48).

"SPID-48 is the sum of the pain intensity difference (PID) over the 48 hour time period. A pain intensity score of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse possible pain) is obtained before starting the study and throughout the 48 time period. The pain score at each assessment time is subtracted from the baseline pain score to provide the total sum score or SPID-48. A higher SPID-48 is better and indicates a reduction in pain intensity compared to the baseline score. The range of SPID48 scores were -232 to 326.~Time-weighted SPID48 = ∑ [T(i) - T(i-1)] x PID(i), where T(0) = Time 0 (baseline), T(i) is the scheduled or unscheduled assessment time, and PID(i) is the PID score at time i for i=0 to 48 hours.~Note: Active group n=114 and placebo group n=58, instead of active n=115 and placebo n=57, due to one active patient receiving placebo inadvertently." (NCT01539642)
Timeframe: 48 hours

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sufentanil NanoTab PCA System/15 mcg105.60
Placebo Sufentanil NanoTab PCA System55.58

[back to top]

CST 1/2

time for maximum plasma concentration to decrease by 50% (NCT01639729)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Sufentanil IV0.14
Sufentanil NanoTab Buccal2.28
Sufentanil NanoTab Sublingual2.50
Sufentanil NanoTab Oral2.00

[back to top]

AUC (0 - Inf)

total amount of sufentanil absorbed (NCT01639729)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionh.pg/mL (Mean)
Sufentanil IV273.8
Sufentanil NanoTab Buccal212.5
Sufentanil NanoTab Sublingual163.4
Sufentanil NanoTab Oral24.9

[back to top]

Cmax

maximum plasma concentration (NCT01639729)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Sufentanil IV445.1
Sufentanil NanoTab Buccal58.9
Sufentanil NanoTab Sublingual40.6
Sufentanil NanoTab Oral4.3

[back to top]

Tmax

time to maximum plasma concentration (NCT01639729)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Sufentanil IV0.07
Sufentanil NanoTab Buccal0.85
Sufentanil NanoTab Sublingual0.83
Sufentanil NanoTab Oral1.11

[back to top]

Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 48-hour Study Period (SPID48).

"SPID-48 is the sum of the pain intensity difference (PID) over the 48 hour time period. A pain intensity score of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse possible pain) is obtained before starting the study and throughout the 48 time period. The pain score at each assessment time is subtracted from the baseline pain score to provide the total sum score or SPID-48. A higher SPID-48 is better and indicates a reduction in pain intensity compared to the baseline score. Range of SPID48 scores were -239 to 417.~Time-weighted SPID48 = ∑ [T(i) - T(i-1)] x PID(i), where T(0) = Time 0 (baseline), T(i) is the scheduled or unscheduled assessment time, and PID(i) is the PID score at time i for i=0 to 48 hours" (NCT01660763)
Timeframe: 48 hours

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sufentanil NanoTab PCA System/15 mcg76.24
Placebo Sufentanil NanoTab PCA System-11.35

[back to top]

SPID-12

"The primary outcome measure is the summed pain intensity difference over the 12-hour study period (SPID-12). A pain intensity score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained at baseline and throughout the 12 hour study period. The SPID-12 is calculated by summing the difference between baseline pain score and pain score at each assessment time point.~The SPID-12 ranges from -120 (indicative of an increase in pain) to 120 (indicative of a decrease in pain). A higher SPID-12 score is better." (NCT01710345)
Timeframe: 12 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sufentanil NanoTab 20 mcg-5.65
Sufentanil NanoTab 30 mcg6.53
Placebo NanoTab-7.12

[back to top]

Cmax

Maximum plasma concentration; After each dosing of Sufentanil NanoTab, serial blood samples will be taken at regular time points. (NCT01721070)
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, 600, 720, and 840 minutes, and 24 hours after dosing.

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
SUF NT 15 mcg39.95
Ketoconazole 400 mg and SUF NT 15 mcg46.00

[back to top]

AUC (0-inf)

Total amount of sufentanil absorbed; After each dosing of Sufentanil NanoTab, serial blood samples will be taken at regular time points. (NCT01721070)
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, 600, 720, and 840 minutes, and 24 hours after dosing.24 hours

Interventionh*pg/mL (Geometric Mean)
SUF NT 15 mcg126.47
Ketoconazole 400 mg and SUF NT 15 mcg223.63

[back to top]

Incidence of Motor Block

The assessment of the degree of motor block was performed in the right and left lower extremities using the Breen modified Bromage score: 1 = complete block (unable to move feet or knees), 2 = almost complete block (able to move feet only), 3 = partial block (just able to move knees), 4 = detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine (between scores 3 and 5), 5 = no detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine (full flexion of knees), and 6 = able to stand and to perform partial knee bend. Patients with a Bromage score < 6 were considered to have motor block. (NCT01860521)
Timeframe: Assessed every hour from starting the analgesia procedure (up to 66 hours from starting of the procedure).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Continuous Epidural Infusion24
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus3

[back to top]

Total Sufentanil Consumption.

(NCT01860521)
Timeframe: During the whole analgesia procedure (assessed between the starting of the procedure until 66 hours).

Interventionmicrog (Mean)
Continuous Epidural Infusion69.0
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus60.4

[back to top]

Total Levobupivacaine Consumption

(NCT01860521)
Timeframe: At the moment of fetal expulsion (up to 66 hours from starting of the procedure).

Interventionmg (Mean)
Continuous Epidural Infusion86.2
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus75.5

[back to top]

Degree of Satisfaction of the Patients With the Analgesia Procedure

"At discharge from the hospital, patients were requested to answer the following question Taking into consideration the variations in pain symptoms, as well as the adverse events experienced, if any, how would you define the grade of satisfaction with your analgesic treatment? The grade of satisfaction was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to completely unsatisfied and 100 to completely satisfied." (NCT01860521)
Timeframe: At discharge from the hospital (up to 72 hours from starting of the procedure).

Interventionmm (Mean)
Continuous Epidural Infusion73.2
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus84.4

[back to top]

Normalized Area of Hyperalgesia Around the Incision

The skin around the incision is stimulated in steps of 5 mm at intervals of 1 s starting outside of the hyperalgesic area in the direction of the incision. The distance from the incision to the first point where a 'painful', 'sore' or 'sharper' feeling occurred is measured and noted. This measurement is repeated at predefined radial lines around the incision. To eliminate the variable length of incision, this length is subtracted from the longer diameter leaving four radial distances from the end and from the middle of the incision. The normalized area of hyperalgesia is calculated by summing up the areas of the remaining four triangles measured by and Von Frey filament. (NCT02043366)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventioncm^2 (Mean)
Normal Saline60.46
Flurbiprofen AxetilⅠ53.64
Flurbiprofen AxetilⅡ56.57
Butorphanol54.00
Butorphanol-Flurbiprofen Axetil52.5
Sufentanil49.89

[back to top]

Mechanical Hyperalgesia Threshold on the Dominant Inner Forearm

The mechanical hyperalgesia threshold was defined as the lowest force (g) necessary to bend a Von Frey filament, which was perceived to be painful by the patient and measured by Von Frey filament at 24 hours postoperatively (NCT02043366)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventiong (Mean)
Normal Saline60.57
Flurbiprofen AxetilⅠ78.29
Flurbiprofen AxetilⅡ68.50
Butorphanol79.7
Butorphanol-Flurbiprofen Axetil81.64
Sufentanil89.5

[back to top]

TOTPAR24

Total pain relief over the 24 hour study period. The observed total pain relief scores ranged from 12.35 to 95.23 in the active group and 2.61 to 82.04 in the placebo group. A higher score indicates greater pain relief. (NCT02356588)
Timeframe: 24 Hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg45.80
Placebo Tablet35.45

[back to top]

Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 12-hour Study Period (SPID12).

"The primary outcome measure is the summed pain intensity difference to baseline over the 12-hour study period (SPID-12). A pain intensity score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained at baseline and throughout the 12 hour study period. The SPID-12 is calculated by summing the difference between baseline pain score and pain score at each assessment time point.~The observed SPID-12 scores ranged from -42.15 to 71.87 in the active group and -34.96 to 64.37 in the placebo group. A negative score indicates an increase in pain intensity and a higher score indicates a greater decrease in pain intensity." (NCT02356588)
Timeframe: 12 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg25.84
Placebo Tablet13.14

[back to top]

Time-weighted SPRID24

Time-weighted summed pain relief intensity difference (SPRID) over the 24 hour study period. The observed SPRID scores ranged from -49.67 to 222.04 in the active group and -24.97 to 237.54 in the placebo group. A negative score indicates an increase in pain intensity and decrease in pain relief, while a higher score indicates a greater decrease in pain intensity and increase in pain relief. (NCT02356588)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg103.88
Placebo Tablet73.05

[back to top]

Time-weighted SPRID12

Time-weighted summed pain relief intensity difference (SPRID) over the 12 hour study period. The observed SPRID scores ranged from -38.08 to 106.82 in the active group and -20.10 to 95.72 in the placebo group. A negative score indicates an increase in pain intensity and decrease in pain relief, while a higher score indicates a greater decrease in pain intensity and increase in pain relief. (NCT02356588)
Timeframe: 12 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg47.03
Placebo Tablet28.62

[back to top]

Summary of Number of Rescue Morphine Doses Used by Study Period in the ITT Population

(NCT02356588)
Timeframe: Cumulative through 12 hours

Interventionmean number of doses used (Mean)
Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg0.4
Placebo Tablet1.6

[back to top]

Summed Pain Intensity Difference

"The SPID-1 is calculated by summing the difference to baseline between baseline pain score and the pain score at each assessment time point through 1 hour.~The observed SPID scores ranged from -2.00 to 5.25 in the active group to -4.90 to 3.00 in the placebo group. A negative score indicates an increase in pain intensity and a higher score indicates a greater decrease in pain intensity." (NCT02356588)
Timeframe: 1 hour

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg1.09
Placebo Tablet-0.37

[back to top]

Summary of Number of Rescue Morphine Doses Used by Study Period in the ITT Population

(NCT02356588)
Timeframe: Cumulative through 6 hours

Interventionmean number of doses used (Mean)
Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg0.3
Placebo Tablet1.1

[back to top]

Summary of Number of Rescue Morphine Doses Used by Study Period in the ITT Population

(NCT02356588)
Timeframe: Cumulative through 24 hours

Interventionmean number of doses used (Mean)
Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg0.5
Placebo Tablet2.1

[back to top]

TOTPAR12

Total pain relief over the 12 hours. The observed total pain relief scores ranged from 4.08 to 47.50 in the active group and 1.77 to 33.71 in the placebo group. A higher score indicates greater pain relief. (NCT02356588)
Timeframe: 12 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg21.18
Placebo Tablet15.36

[back to top]

Patient Global Assessment

Proportion of patients who responded good or excellent to the global assessment of method of pain control at 24 hours (NCT02356588)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg80.4
Placebo Tablet51.9

[back to top]

Healthcare Professional Global Assessment

Proportion of Health Care Professionals who responded good or excellent to the global assessment of method of pain control at 24 hours (NCT02356588)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionPercentage of HCPs (Number)
Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg80.4
Placebo Tablet53.7

[back to top]

Analysis of Total Number of Doses Used During the 24-Hour Study Period in the ITT Population

(NCT02356588)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionmean number of tablets taken (Mean)
Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg7.09
Placebo Tablet6.40

[back to top]

Analysis of Total Number of Doses Used During the 12-Hour Study Period in the ITT Population

(NCT02356588)
Timeframe: Cumulative through 12 hours

Interventionmean number of tablets taken (Mean)
Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg4.4
Placebo Tablet4.7

[back to top]

Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 24-hour Study Period (SPID24).

The primary outcome measure is the summed pain intensity difference to baseline over the 24-hour study period (SPID-24). A pain intensity score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained at baseline and throughout the 24 hour study period. The SPID-24 is calculated by summing the difference between baseline pain score and pain score at each assessment time point. The observed SPID-24 scores ranged from -70.00 to 148.70 in the active group to -58.09 to 160.24 in the placebo group. A negative score indicates an increase in pain intensity and a higher score indicates a greater decrease in pain intensity. (NCT02356588)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg57.96
Placebo Tablet37.28

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

The frequency and the severity (ex) of the side effects including nausea and vomiting, hypotension, pruritus, and bradycardia were recorded. (NCT02430090)
Timeframe: Up to 4 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Levobupivacaine5
Levobupivacaine + Fentanyl10
Levobupivacaine + Sufentanil9

[back to top]

TOTPAR1 (Time-weighted)

"The total pain relief (TOTPAR) is the time-weighted sum of the pain relief scores over the first hour (15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes and 1-hour after the first dose of study drug is taken) of the study period.~The minimum score is 0.00 and the maximum score is 4.00. A higher score indicates greater pain relief." (NCT02447848)
Timeframe: 1-hour

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet 30 mcg1.37

[back to top]

PI at Each Evaluation Time Point

Pain intensity at each evaluation time point after the first dose of study drug up through 5 hours is evaluated using an 11-point NRS where 0 equals no pain and 10 equals worst possible pain. The score was obtained at Baseline, 15- , 30-, 45- minutes, 1-hour, and 2-hours after the first dose for all patients, and at hours 3, 4, and 5 for cohort 2 (patients 41-76). Scores ranged from 0 -10 for the first two hours, and 2 - 10 for hours three to five. (NCT02447848)
Timeframe: 5 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline15-minutes30-minutes45-minutes1-hour2-hours3-hours4-hours5-hours
Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet 30 mcg8.086.006.235.515.25.496.834.672

[back to top]

Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 1-hour (SPID1).

"The primary efficacy endpoint is the time-weighted SPID1 evaluated from the patient questionnaire data. Pain intensity (PI) will be measured using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) with 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst possible pain).~The patient's rating of PI will be measured at baseline and at 0.25 (15 min), 0.5 (30 min), 0.75 (45 min), 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 hours following the first dose of study drug.~The PID at each evaluation time point after the initiation of the first dose is the difference in PI at the specific evaluation time point and baseline pain intensity [PID (evaluation time after the first dose) = PI(baseline) - PI(evaluation time after the first dose)]. The time-weighted SPID1 is the time-weighted summed PID over the 1-hour study period.~The observed SPID scores ranged from -.70 to 8.00. A negative score indicates an increase in pain intensity and a positive score indicates a decrease in pain intensity." (NCT02447848)
Timeframe: One hour

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet 30 mcg2.11

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction With Labor Analgesia

0-100% (0 means least satisfaction and 100 means most satisfaction) (NCT02573597)
Timeframe: Participants were assessed once from initial epidural bolus to delivery (up to approximately 16 hours)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Part A Group 197.3
Part A Group 297.6
Part B Group 399.2
Part B Group 496.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Maternal Nausea/Vomiting

yes/no. (NCT02573597)
Timeframe: From initial epidural bolus to delivery (up to 16 hours following initial bolus)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part A Group 10
Part A Group 20
Part B Group 30
Part B Group 42

[back to top]

Minimum Local Analgesic Concentration (MLAC) of the Final Participants in Each Respective Group at Study Completion

The mean concentration of Bupivacaine in patients who have success or failure outcome were compared between groups. (NCT02573597)
Timeframe: From initial epidural bolus to delivery (up to approximately 16 hours)

Intervention% mg/ml (Mean)
Part A Group 10.06
Part A Group 20.06
Part B Group 30.075
Part B Group 40.072

[back to top]

Number of Participants Requiring Treatment for Pruritus, Nausea and Vomiting, or Hypotension

Number of Participants Requiring Treatment for pruritus, nausea and vomiting, and hypotension were reported. (NCT02573597)
Timeframe: From initial epidural bolus to delivery (up to 16 hours following initial bolus)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part A Group 10
Part A Group 20
Part B Group 32
Part B Group 43

[back to top]

Numerical Verbal Pain Scores

The initial pain score (VAS 0-10 scale with 0 means no pain and 10 means max pain) in patients who have success or failure outcome were compared between groups. (NCT02573597)
Timeframe: Patients were assessed once between initial epidural bolus to delivery (up to 16 hours following initial bolus)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Part A Group 16.3
Part A Group 28.4
Part B Group 37.7
Part B Group 48.2

[back to top]

Time to First Clinician Rescue Analgesia Request (From Initial Epidural Dose)

The time to first clinician rescue analgesia request in patients who have success or failure outcome were compared between groups. (NCT02573597)
Timeframe: From initial epidural bolus to delivery (up to 16 hours following initial bolus)

Interventionhours (Mean)
Part A Group 14.3
Part A Group 25.3
Part B Group 37.5
Part B Group 44.8

[back to top]

Protocol Success or Failure

"Success - No supplemental analgesia request until vaginal exam c/w 8 cm dilation or more -> 0.01% w/v reduction in subsequent participant's local anesthetic.~Failure - Supplemental analgesia request c vaginal exam c/w less than 8 cm dilatation ->0.01% w/v increase in subsequent LA infusion." (NCT02573597)
Timeframe: From initial epidural bolus to delivery (up to 16 hours following initial bolus)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SuccessFailure
Part A Group 113
Part A Group 232
Part B Group 324
Part B Group 424

[back to top]

Labor Outcome (Spontaneous, Assisted, Cesarean)

Labor outcome in patients who have success or failure outcome were compared between groups. (NCT02573597)
Timeframe: At the time of delivery

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SpontaneousC-section
Part A Group 131
Part A Group 232
Part B Group 342
Part B Group 460

[back to top]

Adherence to PONV Guidelines

PONV guideline adherence: percentage of patients who received the exact number of prophylactic interventions for PONV that were recommended by the decision support. (NCT02625181)
Timeframe: A specific time frame on the day of surgery: the start of admission at the holding room to the end of the anesthetic case

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline Measurement666
CDS Email Recommendations5260
CDS Email + Real TIme Recommenations5863

[back to top]

PONV Incidence: Number of Participants With Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

The occurrence of PONV, as defined by the administration of antiemetics in the PACU between admission to PACU and discharge from PACU. (NCT02625181)
Timeframe: PACU recovery period

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline Measurement139
CDS Email Recommendations1323
CDS Email + Real TIme Recommenations1343

[back to top]

The Number of Prophylactic Interventions for PONV

the absolute number of prophylactic interventions applied between the admission of the patient in the holding room until admission to the PACU. (NCT02625181)
Timeframe: A specific time frame on the day of surgery: from the start of admission at the holding room to the end of the anesthetic case

Interventionprophylactic antiemetics administered (Mean)
Baseline Measurement2.196
CDS Email Recommendations2.176
CDS Email + Real TIme Recommenations2.129

[back to top]

Time to Discharge From the Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU)

This is the number of minutes from admission to the PACU until discharge, assessed up to 2 days (NCT02625181)
Timeframe: A specific time frame on the day of surgery: from the start of admission to the PACU to discharge from the PACU

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Baseline Measurement266
CDS Email Recommendations264
CDS Email + Real TIme Recommenations266

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals Who Responded to the Global Assessments as Excellent or Good"

"Healthcare professionals were asked Overall, how would you rate the method of pain control? Poor (1) Fair (2) Good (3) Excellent (4)" (NCT02662556)
Timeframe: 12 hours or until patients' termination from study

Interventionpercentage of healthcare professionals (Number)
Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet (SST) 30 mcg90.2

[back to top]

Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the First Hour (SPID1).

The pain intensity difference (PID) at each evaluation time point after the dose of study drug is the difference in pain intensity at the specific evaluation time point and baseline pain intensity [PID(evaluation time after the first dose) = PI(baseline) - PI(evaluation time after the first dose)]. A pain intensity score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained at baseline and throughout the 1 hour period. The time-weighted SPID1 is the time-weighted summed PID over the 1-hour study period. The scores ranged from -6.67 to 6.77. A negative score indicates an increase in pain intensity and a higher score indicates a greater decrease in pain intensity. (NCT02662556)
Timeframe: 1 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet (SST) 30 mcg0.87

[back to top]

Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 12-hour Study Period (SPID12).

The pain intensity difference (PID) at each evaluation time point after the dose of study drug is the difference in pain intensity at the specific evaluation time point and baseline pain intensity [PID(evaluation time after the first dose) = PI(baseline) - PI(evaluation time after the first dose)]. A pain intensity score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained at baseline and throughout the 12 hour period. The time-weighted SPID12 is the time-weighted summed PID over the 12-hour study period. The scores ranged from -13.75 to 100.5. A negative score indicates an increase in pain intensity and a higher score indicates a greater decrease in pain intensity. (NCT02662556)
Timeframe: 12-hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet (SST) 30 mcg36.04

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Global Assessments as Excellent or Good"

"Patients were asked Overall, how would you rate the method of pain control? Poor (1), Fair (2), Good (3), or Excellent (4)" (NCT02662556)
Timeframe: 12 hours or at patients' termination from study

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet (SST) 30 mcg87.4

[back to top]

Number of Study Drug Doses Used

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventiondoses (Mean)
24-hour treatment period48-hour treatment period72-hour treatment period
Zalviso™ 15 mcg15.721.922.8

[back to top]

Nurse Usability Questionnaire (NUQ)

Questionnaire regarding the usability of Zalviso completed by HCPs who had set up at least 5 Zalviso Systems for patients (NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Agreed Zalviso easy to set upAgreed had confidence to set up ZalvisoAgreed no need to trouble-shoot during patient useAgreed with appropriate tablet accountabilityAgreed Zalviso was not time-consuming to set upAgreed Zalviso instructions were clearWould recommend using Zalviso
Zalviso™ 15 mcg92.592.587.510072.59087.5

[back to top]

Pain Intensity (PI) at Each Evaluation Time Point

At protocol-specified time points, the patient is asked to self-record his/her current level of pain on an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 equals no pain and 10 equals the worst possible pain. (NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline15 minutes30 minutes45 minutes1 hour2 hours4 hours6 hours8 hours10 hours12 hours16 hours20 hours24 hours28 hours32 hours36 hours40 hours44 hours48 hours52 hours56 hours60 hours64 hours68 hours72 hours
Zalviso™ 15 mcg5.844.774.464.053.703.373.393.203.183.102.973.083.203.163.163.153.062.962.932.822.762.772.752.762.772.76

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at Each Evaluation Time Point

The PID at each evaluation time point after the dose of study drug is the difference in pain intensity at the specific evaluation time point and baseline pain intensity [PID(evaluation time after the first dose) = PI(baseline) - PI(evaluation time after the first dose)]. The higher the PID score, the lower the pain intensity. The scores ranged from - 239 to 624. (NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline15 minutes30 minutes45 minutes1 hour2 hours4 hours6 hours8 hours10 hours12 hours16 hours20 hours24 hours28 hours32 hours36 hours40 hours44 hours48 hours52 hours56 hours60 hours64 hours68 hours72 hours
Zalviso™ 15 mcg5.841.071.381.792.142.482.452.642.672.742.882.772.652.692.682.692.782.882.913.023.083.083.093.083.083.08

[back to top]

Pain Relief (PR) at Each Evaluation Time Point

At protocol-specified time points, the patient is asked to self-record his/her current level of pain relief on 5-point numerical rating scale where 0 equaled no pain relief and 4 equaled complete pain relief. The baseline score references the baseline pain intensity score and the following timepoints reference pain relief scores. (NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
(Not Applicable)15 minutes30 minutes45 minutes1 hour2 hours4 hours6 hours8 hours10 hours12 hours16 hours20 hours24 hours28 hours32 hours36 hours40 hours44 hours48 hours52 hours56 hours60 hours64 hours68 hours72 hours
Zalviso™ 15 mcgNA1.181.421.671.812.082.122.242.242.322.372.312.302.422.372.342.342.392.412.442.482.482.492.482.492.50

[back to top]

Patient Usability Questionnaire (PUQ)

Questionnaire completed by patients at the end of his/her participation in the study regarding the usability of Zalviso. (NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Agreed Zalviso was easy to useAgreed having confidence to doseAgreed Zalviso worked consistently as expectedAgreed they knew how to use ZalvisoAgreed they knew what to do if a tablet droppedAgreed Zalviso instructions were explainedAgreed to request Zalviso after next surgery
Zalviso™ 15 mcg90.592.482.393.486.191.280.4

[back to top]

Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 48-hour Study Period (SPID-48) Study Period

The pain intensity difference (PID) at each evaluation time point after the dose of study drug is the difference in pain intensity at the specific evaluation time point and baseline pain intensity [PID(evaluation time after the first dose) = PI(baseline) - PI(evaluation time after the first dose)]. A pain intensity score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained at baseline and at protocol-specified time points and throughout the 48 hour period. The time-weighted SPID48 is the time-weighted summed PID over the 48-hour study period. A negative score indicates an increase in pain intensity and a higher score indicates a greater decrease in pain intensity.The scores ranged from -144 to 408. (NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg130.69

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professional (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) as Excellent at 24 Hours"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg52.2

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professional (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) as Poor at 24 Hours"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg0.7

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) as Fair at 24 Hours"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg8.1

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Rate the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 48 Hours as Good or Excellent"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg95.1

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Rated the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 24 Hours as Good or Excellent"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg91.1

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Rated the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 72 Hours as Good or Excellent"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg100

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA )at 48 Hours as Good"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg27.5

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) as Good at 24 Hours"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg38.9

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 48 Hours as Excellent"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg67.6

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 48 Hours as Fair"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg3.9

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 48 Hours as Poor"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg1.0

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 72 Hours as Excellent"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg91.7

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 72 Hours as Fair"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg0

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 72 Hours as Good"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg8.3

[back to top]

"Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 72 Hours as Poor"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of HCPs (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg0

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Rate the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 24 Hours as Good or Excellent"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg86.1

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Rate the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 48 Hours as Good or Excellent"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg88.5

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Rate the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 72 Hours as Good or Excellent"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg100

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) as Excellent at 24 Hours"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg45.2

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) as Fair at 24 Hours"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg12.6

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) as Good at 24 Hours"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg40.8

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) as Poor at 24 Hours"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg1.4

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 48 Hours as Excellent"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg46.9

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 48 Hours as Fair"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg10.6

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 48 Hours as Good"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg41.6

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 48 Hours as Poor"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg0.9

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 72 Hours as Excellent"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg57.1

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 72 Hours as Fair"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg0

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 72 Hours as Good"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg42.9

[back to top]

"Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 72 Hours as Poor"

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg0

[back to top]

Average Hourly Use of Study Drug

Average number of study drug doses used per hour, adjusting by treatment exposure time and study period (NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionaverage number of study doses per hour (Mean)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg0.82

[back to top]

Number of Misplaced Tablets (i.e., Tablet Found Outside the Patient's Mouth)

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Interventiontablets (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg13

[back to top]

Number of Zalviso System Notifications to the Nurse to Retrain Patient to Not Pull Down on the Controller While Dosing

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

InterventionNotifications (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Experienced at Least One System-generated Error Based on the Controller Data While Using the Zalviso System

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg2.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Either a System-generated Error or a Misplaced Tablet (i.e., a Dispense Failure)

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg5.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Either a System-generated Error or a Misplaced Tablet That Caused an Analgesic Gap

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg2.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Terminated From the Study Due to Inadequate Analgesia After the 24-hour Study Period and Prior to or During the 48 Hour Study Period

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg2.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Terminated From the Study Due to Inadequate Analgesia Over the 24-hour Study Period

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg2.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Terminated From the Study Due to Inadequate Analgesia Prior to or During the 72 Hour Study Period

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Misplaced Tablet(s)

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg3.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients, if Any, With Tablet Dispensed When the Zalviso System Was in Lockout

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients, if Any, With Tablets Dispensed But Not Requested

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg0

[back to top]

Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 24-hour Study Period (SPID24)

The pain intensity difference (PID) at each evaluation time point after the dose of study drug is the difference in pain intensity at the specific evaluation time point and baseline pain intensity [PID(evaluation time after the first dose) = PI(baseline) - PI(evaluation time after the first dose)]. A pain intensity score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained at baseline and at protocol-specified time points throughout the 24 hour period. The time-weighted SPID24 is the time-weighted summed PID over the 24-hour study period. A negative score indicates an increase in pain intensity and a higher score indicates a greater decrease in pain intensity.The scores ranged from - 72 to 204. (NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg63.09

[back to top]

Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 72-hour Study Period (SPID-72) Study Period

The pain intensity difference (PID) at each evaluation time point after the dose of study drug is the difference in pain intensity at the specific evaluation time point and baseline pain intensity [PID(evaluation time after the first dose) = PI(baseline) - PI(evaluation time after the first dose)]. A pain intensity score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained at baseline and at protocol-specified time points throughout the 72 hour period. The time-weighted SPID72 is the time-weighted summed PID over the 72-hour study period. A negative score indicates an increase in pain intensity and a higher score indicates a greater decrease in pain intensity. The scores ranged from -239 to 624. (NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg204.66

[back to top]

Total Amount of Supplemental Morphine (mg) Utilized

Supplemental opioid medication (2 mg IV morphine) was allowed in the first 30 minutes after the first on-demand dose of study drug had been administered, if necessary, to keep a patient comfortable. Otherwise, supplemental opioid medication (2 mg IV morphine, no more frequently than hourly) was allowed for pain due to ambulation or with the initiation of passive range of motion therapy throughout the remainder of the study. (NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionamount of morphine (mg) used (Mean)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg0.1

[back to top]

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Over the 24-hour Study Period (TOTPAR24)

Total pain relief over the 24-hour study period. A higher TOTPAR score means a greater relief in pain. Range of scores was from 0.00 to 96.00. (NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg54.27

[back to top]

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Over the 48-hour Study Period (TOTPAR48)

Total pain relief over the 48-hour study period. A higher TOTPAR score means a greater relief in pain. Range of scores was from 0.00 to 192.00. (NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg111.42

[back to top]

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Over the 72-hour Study Period (TOTPAR72)

Total pain relief over the 72-hour study period. A higher TOTPAR means a greater relief in pain. Range of scores was from 0.00 to 288.00. (NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Zalviso™ 15 mcg171.10

[back to top]

Average Inter-dosing Interval (in Minutes)

(NCT02662764)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours

Interventionaverage interval (minutes) between doses (Mean)
24-hour study period48-hour study period72-hour study period
Zalviso™ 15 mcg121.4123.2120.9

[back to top]

Sensitive Block at End of Surgery

Level of Sensory block assessed as loss of sensation to cold, every 2 minutes after spinal anesthesia during 15 minutes, then every 5 minutes until the end of surgery, thereafter, once 30 minutes until total regression of sensory block (T12-S1). For this study, dermatome levels are depicted on a scale ranging from 1 to 18. (1 to 12 = T1-T12 thoracic levels; 13 to 17 = L1-L5 lumbar levels; 18 = S1 sacral level) (NCT03036384)
Timeframe: Until complete release of sensory block (T12-S1) (average 4 hours)

InterventionDermatome level (Median)
45mg HB Prilocaine3.88
50mg HB Prilocaine3.00

[back to top]

Number of Participants Needing Vasopressors

"Arterial blood pressure will be measured at every 2.5 minute during surgery, then at every 20 minutes in the PACU (Post Anesthesia Care Unit). Vasopressors were given for patients with low blood pressure.~A low blood pressure is defined as a blood pressure lower than 20% or more than the basal blood pressure (Systolic blood pressure before spinal anesthesia)." (NCT03036384)
Timeframe: during surgery (average 1 hour)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
45mg HB Prilocaine15
50mg HB Prilocaine2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dizziness

All parturients will be questioned for dizziness (yes or no) (NCT03036384)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours after surgery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
45mg HB Prilocaine5
50mg HB Prilocaine2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Nausea or Vomiting

from 15 minutes after spinal anesthesia and every 4 hours for 24 hours (score 0=no symptoms; 1=symptoms with no treatment necessary; 2=symptoms present and treated) (NCT03036384)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours after surgery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
45mg HB Prilocaine3
50mg HB Prilocaine0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Pruritus

from 15 minutes after spinal anesthesia and every 4 hours for 24 hours (score 0=no symptoms; 1=symptoms with no treatment necessary; 2=symptoms present and treated) (NCT03036384)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours after surgery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
45mg HB Prilocaine0
50mg HB Prilocaine0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Transient Neurologic Symptoms (TNS)

TNS are defined as pain and/or dysesthesia occurred after complete release of sensory block at the gluteal level, at the thighs and at the legs. At Day 0, Day 1, Day 3 and Day 5 (NCT03036384)
Timeframe: up to 5 Days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
45mg HB Prilocaine0
50mg HB Prilocaine0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Urinary Retention

All parturients will be questioned for urinary retention (yes or no) (NCT03036384)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours after surgery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
45mg HB Prilocaine0
50mg HB Prilocaine0

[back to top]

Number of Satisfied Participants

Maternal satisfaction (yes or no) will be assessed 1 hour after surgery in the PACU (Post Anesthesia Care Unit) (NCT03036384)
Timeframe: up to 1 hour after surgery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
45mg HB Prilocaine16
50mg HB Prilocaine4

[back to top]

Success of Anesthesia

The nerve blockade will be considered as success when a bilateral T4 level will reach in 15 minutes after intrathecal injection without additional epidural injection needed within 45 minutes peri-operative ; no pain at the skin incision, no pain during 45 minutes after the skin incision (NCT03036384)
Timeframe: during surgery (average 1 hour)

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SuccessFailure
Cohort 140
Cohort 1031
Cohort 240
Cohort 340
Cohort 413
Cohort 540
Cohort 640
Cohort 740
Cohort 840
Cohort 931

[back to top]

Bromage Motor Block Level at End of Surgery

Bromage scale (1 = no motor block; 2 = hip blocked; 3 = hip and knee blocked; and 4 = hip, knee, and ankle blocked) was used to evaluate the motor block every 15 min after spinal anaesthesia (T0) and until the end of surgery. (NCT03036384)
Timeframe: Until complete release of motor block (average 4 hours)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
45mg HB Prilocaine3.56
50mg HB Prilocaine4.00

[back to top]

Newborn Apgar Score

"Newborn Apgar score assessed at 1, 5, 10 minutes after baby extraction. The Apgar score is determined by evaluating the newborn baby on five simple criteria on a scale from 0 to 2, then summing up the five values thus obtained. The overall resulting score ranges from 0 to 10 ( 0-3 : severely depressed, 4-6 : Moderately depressed and 7-10 : Excellent condition).~The five criteria are summarized using words chosen to form an abbreviation (Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration)." (NCT03036384)
Timeframe: up to 10 minutes after baby extraction

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Apgar at 1 minuteApgar at 5 minutesApgar at 10 minutes
45mg HB Prilocaine8.479.639.84
50mg HB Prilocaine9.009.7510

[back to top]

Sensitive Block Duration

Level of Sensory block assessed as loss of sensation to cold, every 2 minutes after spinal anesthesia during 15 minutes, then every 5 minutes until the end of surgery, thereafter, once 30 minutes until total regression of sensory block (T12-S1). (NCT03036384)
Timeframe: Until complete release of sensory block (T12-S1) (average 4 hours)

Interventionhours (Mean)
45mg HB Prilocaine2.31
50mg HB Prilocaine3.25

[back to top]

Newborn Methemoglobinemia (MetHb)

Newborn Methemoglobinemia (MetHb) will be assessed at delivery by cordal blood sample, as a routine control, and expressed as a percentage of total hemoglobinemia. (NCT03036384)
Timeframe: average 1 hour

Interventionpercentage of MetHb (Mean)
45mg HB Prilocaine1.59
50mg HB Prilocaine1.60

[back to top]

Motor Block Duration

Bromage scale (1 = no motor block; 2 = hip blocked; 3 = hip and knee blocked; and 4 = hip, knee, and ankle blocked) was used to evaluate the motor block every 15 minutes after spinal anaesthesia (T0) and until the end of surgery. Duration was defined from the time of the spinal injection until Bromage scale = 1. (NCT03036384)
Timeframe: Until complete release of motor block (Bromage scale = 1; average 4 hours)

Interventionhours (Mean)
45mg HB Prilocaine2.75
50mg HB Prilocaine3.50

[back to top]

Comparing the Hemodynamics of the Intervention of the Each Group During the Operation

data of mean arterial pressure (NCT03086213)
Timeframe: During the operation, an average of one hour

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
mean arterial pressure T0mean arterial pressure T1mean arterial pressure T2mean arterial pressure T3
Intercostals Nerve Block Group80868580
Paravertebral Nerve Block Group79857278

[back to top]

Comparing the Hemodynamics of the Intervention of the Each Group During the Operation

data of heart rate (NCT03086213)
Timeframe: During the operation, an average of one hour

,
Interventionbpm (Mean)
heart rate T0heart rate T1heart rate T2heart rate T3
Intercostals Nerve Block Group79859280
Paravertebral Nerve Block Group78848178

[back to top]

Comparing the Blood Gas Analysis After the Intervention of the Each Group

data of arterial partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2) and PaCO2 at different point during the operation (NCT03086213)
Timeframe: During the operation, an average of one hour

,
InterventioncmH2O (Mean)
arterial partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2)arterial partial pressure of PaC
Intercostals Nerve Block Group96.247.3
Paravertebral Nerve Block Group95.251.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Concentration of Cortisol at Different Point During the Operation

(NCT03086213)
Timeframe: During the operation, an average of one hour

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
During the operation, 0mDuring the operation, 15mDuring the operation, 30mDuring the operation, 60m
Intercostals Nerve Block Group125221290318
Paravertebral Nerve Block Group120208258267

[back to top]

Comparing the Inflammatory Markers During the Operation After the Intervention of the Each Group

serum concentrations of Interleukin-6 (NCT03086213)
Timeframe: During the operation, an average of one hour

,
Interventionpg/L (Mean)
Interleukin-6 T0Interleukin-6 T1Interleukin-6 T2Interleukin-6 T3
Intercostals Nerve Block Group35425354
Paravertebral Nerve Block Group33394447

[back to top]

Mechanical Hyperalgesia Threshold on the Dominant Inner Forearm

The mechanical hyperalgesia threshold was defined as the lowest force (g) necessary to bend a Von Frey filament, which was perceived to be painful by the patient and measured by Von Frey filament at 24 hours postoperatively (NCT03096730)
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery

Interventiong (Mean)
Normal Saline61.5
Sufentanil88.2
Dexmedetomidine73.0
Nalmefene67.2
Dexmedetomidine-Nalmefene74.0

[back to top]

Recovery Room Time

The time (reported in minutes) from when the patient arrives in the PACU, right after surgery, to the time that all discharge criteria are met. (NCT04177862)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionminutes (Median)
Sublingual Sufentanil73.0
IV Fentanyl65.0

[back to top]

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)

Number of participants in each arm who are treated for nausea and/or vomiting. (NCT04177862)
Timeframe: 1 day

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sublingual Sufentanil4
IV Fentanyl7

[back to top]

Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS)

Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS) is a 7-item multi-dimensional survey that assesses analgesia benefits. Items are scored on a scale from 0 (minimal) to 4 (maximal). Total score is a sum of the 7 item scores with question 7 scored as 4 minus the patient reported number. Total scores range from 0 to 28 with lower scores representing greater benefit from analgesic therapy. (NCT04177862)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Sublingual Sufentanil3.0
IV Fentanyl3.0

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Number of serious adverse events (grades 3, 4, and 5) experienced by each group (NCT04177862)
Timeframe: 1 day

InterventionSAEs (Number)
Sublingual Sufentanil0
IV Fentanyl0

[back to top]

Rescue Milligram Morphine Equivalents (Opioid Use After Intervention Until Discharge)

All doses of opioid medications administered following initial dosage (sufentanil or fentanyl depending on study arm) will be converted to milligram morphine equivalents and summed for reporting. (NCT04177862)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionmilligram morphine equivalents (Median)
Sublingual Sufentanil15.0
IV Fentanyl22.5

[back to top]

Supplemental Oxygen

Number of participants in each arm who require supplemental oxygen therapy (NCT04177862)
Timeframe: 1 day

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sublingual Sufentanil4
IV Fentanyl4

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration

We will determine if sufentanil infusion administration intra-operatively during routine cardiac surgery will result in a lower plasma concentration of sufentanil at time of arrival to ICU and if the plasma concentration correlates with time to extubation. (NCT04226495)
Timeframe: Lab concentration is drawn when patient arrives to ICU, an average of 1 hour after procedure.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Sufentanil Bolus2.8
Sufentanil Infusion2.8

[back to top]

Time to Extubation

We will determine if sufentanil infusion administration intra-operatively during routine cardiac surgery will decrease time to extubation from OR stop data collection time point by 60 minutes compared to sufentanil bolus administration. (NCT04226495)
Timeframe: Amount of time in minutes from procedure finish to time of extubation, up to 800 minutes.

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Sufentanil Bolus230.5
Sufentanil Infusion242.4

[back to top]

Opioid Use in Recovery Room

Opioid medication type and dose will be recorded and converted to milligram morphine equivalents. Outcome is reported as the total milligram morphine equivalents of opioid medication used in the recovery room. (NCT04387136)
Timeframe: 2 hours

Interventionmg (morphine equivalent) (Median)
Sublingual Sufentanil7.5
Control15.0

[back to top]

Initial Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score Upon Arrival

Pain is assessed on a scale of 0-10 (whole numbers). A score of 0 being no pain, 10 being maximum imaginable pain. Data collected upon arrival to Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). (NCT04387136)
Timeframe: 2 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Sublingual Sufentanil4
Control4

[back to top]

OBAS Score

Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS) is a 7-item multi-dimensional survey that assesses analgesia benefits. Items are scored on a scale from 0 (minimal) to 4 (maximal). Total score is a sum of the 7 item scores with question 7 scored as 4 minus the patient reported number. Total scores range from 0 to 28 with lower scores representing greater benefit from analgesic therapy. (NCT04387136)
Timeframe: 2 hours

Interventionscore (Median)
Sublingual Sufentanil1.0
Control3.0

[back to top]

Total Consumption of Fentanyl in PACU

The total amount of fentanyl consumed in PACU. (NCT04561375)
Timeframe: About 3 hours in PACU

Interventionµg (Median)
Intervention Group0
Control Group25

[back to top]

Time to Fitness for PACU Discharge

This will be determined per facility protocol-scheduled assessments using the CCF Phase II Discharge Scoring tool. The time that the minimum acceptable score of 14 is achieved will be recorded (NCT04561375)
Timeframe: 1 - 2 hours.

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Intervention Group120
Control Group114

[back to top]

Phase 1 Recovery Time

Recovery will be considered complete at the time an order is placed for progression to phase II. (NCT04561375)
Timeframe: 1.5 hours

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Intervention Group77
Control Group66

[back to top]