Page last updated: 2024-12-11

lisinopril

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Lisinopril: One of the ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME INHIBITORS (ACE inhibitors), orally active, that has been used in the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID5362119
CHEMBL ID1237
CHEBI ID43755
SCHEMBL ID15680
MeSH IDM0026771
PubMed CID5362118
CHEMBL ID419213
CHEBI ID6503
SCHEMBL ID542591
MeSH IDM0026771
PubMed CID22887897
CHEMBL ID1729579
SCHEMBL ID454824
MeSH IDM0026771

Synonyms (273)

Synonym
BIDD:GT0755
AB00052250-13
BRD-K67966701-335-03-5
AKOS015836369
KBIO1_001037
DIVK1C_001037
coric
doneka
ici-209k
vivatec
longes
carace
acerbon
prinivil
lysinopril
SPECTRUM_000497
zestril
hsdb 6852
lisinopril
PRESTWICK3_000301
PRESTWICK2_000301
SPECTRUM5_000995
BSPBIO_000262
NCGC00179623-01
IDI1_001037
brn 4276619
alapril
presiten
inhibril
l-proline, n2-((1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl-
noperten
n-(1(s)-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl-l-proline
n2-((s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl-l-proline
mk 521
linvas
sinopryl
lipril
tersif
ccris 3568
tensyn
acercomp
cipril
sinopril
lisoril
l-proline, 1-(n(sup 2)-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl)-, (s)-
lispril
linopril
inopril
mk 522
(s)-1-(n(sup 2)-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl)-l-proline
loril
lisipril
cipral
(s)-1-(n2-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl)-l-proline
lisinal
novatec
tensopril
lisinoprilum [latin]
prinil
einecs 278-488-1
[n2-[(s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-l-lysyl-l-proline
LPR ,
(s)-1-(n(2)-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl)-l-proline
n(2)-[(1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-l-lysyl-l-proline
76547-98-3
lisinopril anhydrous
CHEBI:43755 ,
DB00722
KBIOSS_000977
KBIO2_000977
KBIOGR_001599
KBIO2_006113
KBIO2_003545
KBIO3_002002
SPBIO_001351
PRESTWICK0_000301
SPECTRUM3_000941
SPECTRUM4_001040
NINDS_001037
SPECTRUM2_001456
SPBIO_002481
PRESTWICK1_000301
SPECTRUM1501217
BPBIO1_000290
smr000544473
MLS001306481
n2-[(1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-l-lysyl-l-proline
HMS2090O14
HMS2092L21
L0220
1-[nalpha-[(s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-l-lysyl]-l-proline
MLS001306436
nsc-758151
nsc-751176
CHEMBL1237 ,
lisinopril (inn)
D08131
HMS503O15
(2s)-1-[(2s)-6-amino-2-[[(2s)-1-hydroxy-1-oxo-4-phenylbutan-2-yl]amino]hexanoyl]pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid
HMS1921B14
A838743
(2s)-1-[(2s)-6-amino-2-[[(1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenyl-propyl]amino]hexanoyl]pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid;lisinopril
nsc751176
(s)-1-[n2-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl]-l-proline dihydrate
hipril
qbrelis
nsc758151
pharmakon1600-01501217
CCG-39190
77726-95-5
optimon
laaven
lizinopril
lisopril
unii-7q3p4bs2fd
lisinoprilum
listril
skopryl
lisitec
l-proline, 1-(n2-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl)-
amicor
1-(n2-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl)-l-proline
prinvil
irumed
diroton
l-proline, 1-(n2-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl)-, (s)-
7q3p4bs2fd ,
vitopril
lisinopril [inn]
lizonoton
nanopril
BCP9000856
bdbm50367879
HMS2850N20
1-(n(sup 2)-((s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl)-l-proline
lisinopril [who-dd]
lisinopril [mi]
l-proline, 1-(n(sup 2)-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl)-
S2076
AKOS015894970
gtpl6360
n-[n2 -(1(s)-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl]-l-proline
n-[n2 (1(s)-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl]-l-proline
DL-434
HY-18206
SCHEMBL15680
bdbm66979
(2s)-1-[(2s)-6-amino-2-[[(1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenyl-propyl]amino]hexanoyl]proline;hydrate
(2s)-1-[(2s)-6-amino-2-[[(1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]amino]hexanoyl]pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid;hydrate
cid_22887897
(2s)-1-[(2s)-6-amino-2-[[(1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]amino]-1-oxohexyl]-2-pyrrolidinecarboxylic acid;hydrate
(2s)-1-[(2s)-6-azanyl-2-[[(2s)-1-oxidanyl-1-oxidanylidene-4-phenyl-butan-2-yl]amino]hexanoyl]pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid;hydrate
AB00052250_14
AB00052250_15
DTXSID6040537 ,
(2s)-1-[(2s)-6-amino-2-{[(1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]amino}hexanoyl]pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid
lysinopryl
sr-05000001786
SR-05000001786-1
SBI-0051692.P002
(s)-1-((s)-6-amino-2-(((s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)amino)hexanoyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid
(s)-1-((s)-6-amino-2-((s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropylamino)hexanoyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid
n~2~-[(1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-l-lysyl-l-proline
Q412208
lisinopril (zestril)
(s)-1-[n2-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl]-l-proline
(2s)-1-[(2s)-6-amino-2-[[(1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]amino]hexanoyl]pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid
C76449
NCGC00179623-07
lisiprilprinivil
(s)-lisinopril dihydrate
l-proline, n2-[(1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-l-lysyl-
lisinopril (usp monograph)
dtxcid4020537
n2-((1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl-l-proline, dihydrate
lisinopril (usp-rs)
rtecs ua0658000
c09aa03
n2-((1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl-l-proline
lisinoprilum (latin)
n(2)-((1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl-l-proline
lisinopril (usp impurity)
lisinopril dihydrate (ep monograph)
lisinopril (mart.)
Z1515376765
AC-6226
(s)-lisinopril
(s)-1-(n(2)-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl)-l-proline dihydrate
CHEBI:6503 ,
n(2)-[(1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-l-lysyl-l-proline dihydrate
mk-521
(s)-1-(n2-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl)-l-proline dihydrate
renacor
l-proline, 1-(n(sup 2)-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl)-, dihydrate, (s)-
l-proline, 1-(n2-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl)-, dihydrate, (s)-
(s)-1-(n(sup 2)-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl)-l-proline dihydrate
1-(n(sup 2)-((s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl)-l-proline dihydrate
PRESTWICK_613
cas-83915-83-7
NCGC00017141-01
lisinopril hydrate (jp17)
prinivil (tn)
lisinopril (usp)
lisinopril dihydrate
D00362
zestril (tn)
HMS1568N04
HMS2095N04
lisinopril hydrate
unii-e7199s1ywr
e7199s1ywr ,
nsc 758151
nsc 751176
lisinopril [usan:usp:inn:ban:jan]
ranolip
CHEMBL419213
dtxsid2045600 ,
dtxcid0025600
tox21_110798
AKOS015950799
lisinopril component of prinzide
lisinopril component of zestoretic
prinzide component lisinopril
lisinopril [mart.]
lisinopril dihydrate [who-dd]
lisinopril [usp-rs]
lisinopril [usan]
lisinopril [orange book]
lisinopril [hsdb]
lisinopril dihydrate [mi]
lisinopril hydrate [jan]
lisinopril [usp impurity]
lisinopril [usp monograph]
lisinopril dihydrate [ep monograph]
zestoretic component lisinopril
CCG-220301
lisinopril (dihydrate)
HY-18206A
SCHEMBL542591
tox21_110798_1
NCGC00179623-04
KS-1078
lisinopril-dihydrat
l-proline, n2-[(1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-l-lysyl-, dihydrate
lisinopril dihydrate, british pharmacopoeia (bp) reference standard
sr-01000801314
SR-01000801314-3
lisinopril, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
lisinopril dihydrate, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
F20515
lisinopril, pharmaceutical secondary standard; certified reference material
lisinopril for system suitability a, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
lisinopril, >=98% (hplc)
lisinopril for peak identification, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
lisinopril dihydrate; n2-[(1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-l-lysyl-l-proline dihydrate; (s)-1-[n2-(1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)-l-lysyl]-l-proline dihydrate
HMS3712N04
Q47495698
(s)-1-((s)-6-amino-2-(((s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)amino)hexanoyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid dihydrate
(s)-1-((s)-6-amino-2-(((s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)amino)hexanoyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxylicaciddihydrate
BL164629
l-proline, n2-[(1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-l-lysyl-, hydrate (1:2)
(2s)-1-[(2s)-6-amino-2-{[(1s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]amino}hexanoyl]pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid dihydrate
EN300-19652794
smr001233519
MLS002154258 ,
83915-83-7
HMS2230O24
CHEMBL1729579
SCHEMBL454824
mk-521 (dihydrate)
DTXSID30860992
328395-62-6
lisinopril monohydrate

Research Excerpts

Toxicity

Significantly fewer adverse events were experienced on lisinopril and metoprolol than on diuretic treatment. The main adverse event related to Felodipine was headache, and to Lisinopril was cough. It is concluded that lisinobril 5 mg is a safe starting dose for elderly patients.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" When patients who received lisinopril or placebo for the same period were compared, the proportion of lisinopril patients reporting an adverse event was 44."( Safety of long-term use of lisinopril for congestive heart failure.
Higgins, TJ; Moyses, C, 1992
)
0.28
" Significantly fewer adverse events were experienced on lisinopril and metoprolol than on diuretic treatment."( Quality of life, side effects and efficacy of lisinopril compared with metoprolol in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
Bech, P; Frimodt-Moeller, J; Kornerup, HJ; Poulsen, DL, 1991
)
0.28
" In clinical trials, adverse experiences in patients treated with a lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide combination were dizziness (7."( Review of international safety data for lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide combination treatment.
Murray, NH, 1991
)
0.28
"Data from the lisinopril-captopril comparison trial (6), as well as other data (1, 8, 14, 10) indicate that both long- and short-acting ACEI are effective and safe for the treatment of CHF."( Comparison of lisinopril and captopril in the treatment of left ventricular congestive heart failure--influence of duration of action on efficacy and safety.
Giles, TD, 1991
)
0.28
" Treatment was well tolerated and the profile of adverse events was similar to the pattern found with other nonsulfydryl angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors."( The antihypertensive effect and safety of lisinopril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. A Belgian multicenter study.
De Lame, PA; Droussin, AM; Lame, PA; Thomson, M, 1990
)
0.28
" In the hypertensive population, the most frequent clinical adverse experiences on lisinopril alone were headache, dizziness, cough, and diarrhea."( The safety and tolerability of lisinopril in clinical trials.
Merrill, DD; Rush, JE, 1987
)
0.27
" It is concluded that lisinopril 5 mg is a safe starting dose for elderly patients who are not on diuretics, and that once-daily lisinopril monotherapy reduces BP safety without affecting heart rate."( Safety and efficacy of lisinopril in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension.
De Vriese, G; Marlier, R; Vandepapelière, P, 1989
)
0.28
" Here we compare the clinical and laboratory adverse experiences in younger (under 55 years old) and older (at least 55 years old) patients treated with lisinopril monotherapy."( Safety and tolerability of lisinopril in older hypertensive patients.
Lyle, PA; Rush, JE, 1988
)
0.27
" There were a total of 35 reported adverse events, 22 of which led to withdrawal of the patient from the study."( Effectiveness and safety of diltiazem or lisinopril in treatment of hypertension after heart transplantation. Results of a prospective, randomized multicenter trail.
Bourge, R; Brozena, SC; Clemson, B; Hobbs, R; Johnson, MR; Miller, L; Mills, RM; Naftel, D; Olivari, MT; Quigg, R; Ventura, H, 1996
)
0.29
"These results indicate that both diltiazem and lisinopril are safe for treatment of hypertension after heart transplantation, although titrated monotherapy with either drug controlled the condition in < 50% of patients."( Effectiveness and safety of diltiazem or lisinopril in treatment of hypertension after heart transplantation. Results of a prospective, randomized multicenter trail.
Bourge, R; Brozena, SC; Clemson, B; Hobbs, R; Johnson, MR; Miller, L; Mills, RM; Naftel, D; Olivari, MT; Quigg, R; Ventura, H, 1996
)
0.29
" Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in low dose are a safe and effective long-term therapy for postrenal transplant erythrocytosis."( Treatment of postrenal transplant erythrocytosis. Long-term efficacy and safety of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
Briggs, JD; Junor, BJ; MacGregor, MS; Rodger, RS; Rowe, PA; Watson, MA, 1996
)
0.29
" Adverse events were carefully monitored."( A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study of the effectiveness and safety of lisinopril for children with hypertension.
Miller, K; Shahinfar, S; Soffer, B; Vogt, BA; Zhang, Z, 2003
)
0.32
" Evaluation of safety of the trial was based on the evaluation of a physician, standard laboratory evaluation, adverse effects."( Clinical study on safety and efficacy of the administration of amlodipine in a combination with lisinopril in hypertensive patients.
Arslanagic, A; Bajraktarevic, A; Zulic, I, 2005
)
0.33
" Minor adverse effects have been reported, which were not a reason for interruption of the treatment, with the exception of 3 cases (lower leg oedema, dry cough)."( Clinical study on safety and efficacy of the administration of amlodipine in a combination with lisinopril in hypertensive patients.
Arslanagic, A; Bajraktarevic, A; Zulic, I, 2005
)
0.33
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
" There was no evidence of dose-related increases in the rate of adverse events with aliskiren treatment."( Safety and efficacy of the oral direct renin inhibitor aliskiren in elderly patients with hypertension.
Calvo, C; Keeling, L; Möckel, V; Satlin, A; Verdecchia, P, 2007
)
0.34
"Aliskiren, a novel direct renin inhibitor, provides effective 24-h BP lowering with no evidence of dose-related increases in the incidence of adverse events in elderly patients with hypertension."( Safety and efficacy of the oral direct renin inhibitor aliskiren in elderly patients with hypertension.
Calvo, C; Keeling, L; Möckel, V; Satlin, A; Verdecchia, P, 2007
)
0.34
" The main adverse event related to Felodipine was headache, and to Lisinopril was cough."( [Efficacy, safety and tolerance of Felodipine controlled release tablets and Felodipine controlled release tablets associated combination therapy in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension in China].
Chen, YY; Liu, HL; Shen, FR; Sun, NL; Tao, J; Wu, HY; Xiang, XP; Yu, ZQ; Zhang, FC; Zhang, L; Zhang, WZ; Zhao, JA, 2007
)
0.34
"Even in children with mild immunoglobulin (Ig)A nephropathy (IgA-N) showing minimal/focal mesangial proliferation, persistent proteinuria seems to be a risk factor for progression of the disease, indicating the need for an effective and safe treatment even in such cases."( Efficacy and safety of lisinopril for mild childhood IgA nephropathy: a pilot study.
Awazu, M; Hataya, H; Honda, M; Iijima, K; Ishikura, K; Nakanishi, K; Sako, M; Yoshikawa, N, 2009
)
0.35
" An understanding of structure-activity relationships (SARs) of chemicals can make a significant contribution to the identification of potential toxic effects early in the drug development process and aid in avoiding such problems."( Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
Fisk, L; Greene, N; Naven, RT; Note, RR; Patel, ML; Pelletier, DJ, 2010
)
0.36
" She had been treated with quinapril, enalapril, and lisinopril in the past by different primary care physicians without any adverse effects."( Unique case of presumed lisinopril-induced hepatotoxicity.
Adam, AK; Kumar, S; Loe, S; May, EJ; Sethi, S; Shi, D; Tchokonte, R; Zalawadiya, SK, 2010
)
0.36
"A woman who had received quinapril, enalapril, and lisinopril in the past without apparent adverse effects developed hepatocellular disease that became evident eight months after lisinopril therapy was reinstituted."( Unique case of presumed lisinopril-induced hepatotoxicity.
Adam, AK; Kumar, S; Loe, S; May, EJ; Sethi, S; Shi, D; Tchokonte, R; Zalawadiya, SK, 2010
)
0.36
" Our system employs a sequential, propensity score-matched framework and signalling rules for prospective drug safety monitoring and identified signals for all three adverse drug reactions evaluated."( Early steps in the development of a claims-based targeted healthcare safety monitoring system and application to three empirical examples.
Avorn, J; Bohn, RL; Daniel, GW; Eisenberg, DF; Gagne, JJ; Patrick, AR; Rassen, JA; Rodgers, JK; Schneeweiss, S; Wahl, PM; Wasser, TE; Wilson, M, 2012
)
0.38
" We describe a unique adjunct to standard safety assessment wherein the metabolite profile of treated animals is compared with the MetaMap Tox metabolomics database in order to predict the potential for a wide variety of adverse events, including DIKI."( Prediction of clinically relevant safety signals of nephrotoxicity through plasma metabolite profiling.
Bush, ED; Fabian, E; Herold, M; Kamp, HG; Krennrich, G; Looser, R; Mattes, WB; Mellert, W; Moeller, N; Nadanaciva, S; Naraoka, H; Omura, K; Piccoli, SP; Prokoudine, A; Ruiz-Noppinger, P; Schuppe-Koistinen, I; Strauss, V; van Ravenzwaay, B; Walk, T, 2013
)
0.39
" Propensity scores were generated, and differences in BP and adverse events (angioedema, acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia) between BID/QDay groups were analyzed within dosing cohorts using inverse propensity of treatment-weighted regression models."( Twice-daily versus once-daily lisinopril and losartan for hypertension: Real-world effectiveness and safety.
Botts, SR; Delate, T; Derington, CG; Kao, DP; King, JB; Kroehl, M; Trinkley, KE, 2020
)
0.56
" No severe adverse effects occurred in the intervention group related to the treatment with lisinopril and bisoprolol."( The Role of Lisinopril and Bisoprolol to Prevent Anthracycline Induced Cardiotoxicity in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients.
Abdurahman, M; Azhar, Y; Hidayat, S; Wihandono, A, 2021
)
0.62

Pharmacokinetics

The aim of the present study was to determine whether or not the pharmacokinetic and hemodynamic response to a 20 mg single oral dose of lisinopril was sex-dependent. The method described herein was fully validated and successfully applied to the Pharmacokinetic study of lisinopril tablets in healthy male volunteers after oral administration.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Pharmacokinetic parameters including area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC), peak serum concentration (Cmax) and time to peak concentration (tmax), as well as renal function, blood pressure, and plasma renin activity (PRA) and aldosterone levels, were determined on the first and last days of the study."( Comparison of the steady-state pharmacokinetics of fosinopril, lisinopril and enalapril in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.
Cutler, RE; Ford, NF; Parmer, RJ; Sica, DA, 1991
)
0.28
"Co-administration of drugs with complementary action is a rational approach to the treatment of hypertension provided that the drugs are free of mutual pharmacokinetic interactions."( The pharmacokinetics of co-administered lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide.
Swaisland, AJ, 1991
)
0.28
" Similar differences have been reported for such patient groups when the drugs were administered separately, indicating an absence of pharmacokinetic interaction."( The effects of age and renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of co-administered lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide.
Connell, PA; Hosie, J; Laher, MS; Mulkerrins, E; Smith, RP; Swaisland, AJ, 1991
)
0.28
"The acute hemodynamic, hormonal, and pharmacokinetic aspects of treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor lisinopril were assessed in two studies in 24 patients with chronic stable congestive heart failure (CHF)."( Hemodynamic, hormonal, and pharmacokinetic aspects of treatment with lisinopril in congestive heart failure.
Dickstein, K, 1987
)
0.27
" The influence of renal function and cardiac failure on lisinopril clearance has been confirmed using a population pharmacokinetic analysis technique."( Lisinopril population pharmacokinetics in elderly and renal disease patients with hypertension.
Kelly, JG; Thomson, AH; Whiting, B, 1989
)
0.28
"In an open, crossover study, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of lisinopril and enalapril, administered alone and in combination with propranolol, were evaluated in 12 volunteers."( Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lisinopril and enalapril, alone and in combination with propranolol.
Bendtsen, F; Henriksen, JH, 1989
)
0.28
"The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of two angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, enalapril (a prodrug) and lisinopril (directly acting), were compared in eight patients with hepatic cirrhosis and 10 healthy controls."( Pharmacokinetics of enalapril and lisinopril in subjects with normal and impaired hepatic function.
Bouchier, IA; Hayes, PC; Plevris, JN, 1989
)
0.28
"In a pharmacokinetic drug interaction study, the purpose is to determine whether the coadministration of a drug A with a second drug B alters the absorption/distribution/metabolism/elimination profile of either drug."( The statistical evaluation of a three-period two-treatment crossover pharmacokinetic drug interaction study.
Bolognese, JA; Ciminera, JL; Gregg, MH, 1987
)
0.27
" Traditionally, separate groups of patients, each with different underlying disease, are given the drug and then detailed studies are performed to assess which groups have significantly different pharmacokinetic parameters and therefore require an adjustment in dose."( Population pharmacokinetics of lisinopril in hypertensive patients.
Thomson, AH; Whiting, B, 1987
)
0.27
" In patients with severe renal failure the peak concentrations were higher, the decline in serum concentration was slower and the time to peak concentration was extended."( Pharmacokinetics of lisinopril in hypertensive patients with normal and impaired renal function.
Geyskes, GG; Porsius, AJ; van der Wouw, PA; van Rooij, HH; van Schaik, BA, 1988
)
0.27
" The accumulation half-life averages 12."( Pharmacokinetics of lisinopril.
Beermann, B, 1988
)
0.27
" It is therefore possible to study their pharmacokinetics as well as their pharmacodynamic effects in man."( Pharmacodynamics and population pharmacokinetics of enalapril and lisinopril.
Ajayi, AA; Campbell, BC; Howie, C; Kelman, AW; Meredith, PA; Reid, JL, 1985
)
0.27
" After 15 days of lisinopril treatment pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were determined in patients with advanced renal failure (n = 8; endogenous creatinine clearance [CLCR]: 18 ml."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lisinopril in advanced renal failure. Consequence of dose adjustment.
Fliser, D; Fliser, M; Mutschler, E; Neubeck, M; Nussberger, J; Pritsch, M; Ritz, E; Weisser, K, 1994
)
0.29
"The aim of the present study was to determine whether or not the pharmacokinetic and hemodynamic response to a 20 mg single oral dose of lisinopril was sex-dependent."( Sex-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variations of lisinopril.
Barbanoj, M; Bayés, MC; Jané, F; Martín, S; Masana, E; Sáenz-Campos, D, 1996
)
0.29
" Based upon this study performed on normal dogs given a single dose, no pharmacokinetic advantage or disadvantage is apparent for any ACEi except captopril, which, at the dosage used, decreased ACE levels to a much lesser degree and shorter time."( Comparison of some pharmacokinetic parameters of 5 angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in normal beagles.
Hamlin, RL; Nakayama, T,
)
0.13
" In vehicle-treated SD, SHR and TG+ the half-life (t1/2) of Ang-(1-7) averaged 10+/-1, 10+/-1, and 9+/-1 seconds, respectively."( Converting enzyme determines plasma clearance of angiotensin-(1-7).
Chappell, MC; Ferrario, CM; Ganten, D; Iyer, SN; Yamada, K, 1998
)
0.3
" Samples of blood were collected for determination of pharmacokinetic parameters."( Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of fosinoprilat with enalaprilat and lisinopril in patients with congestive heart failure and chronic renal insufficiency.
Caspi, A; Greenbaum, R; Liao, WC; Mangold, B; Nouriel, H; O'Grady, P; Paz, R; Sclarovsky, S; Yee, KF; Zucchelli, P, 2000
)
0.31
" A single 20 mg oral dose of lisinopril was administrated and pharmacokinetic parameters were compared."( Evaluation of the bioequivalence and pharmacokinetics of two lisinopril tablet formulations after single oral administration in healthy volunteers.
Georgarakis, M; Kontopoulos, G; Tsakalof, A; Tsiptsios, I; Zougrou, F, 2004
)
0.32
"The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of lisinopril were obtained in 46 children aged 6 months to 15 years."( A multicenter study of the pharmacokinetics of lisinopril in pediatric patients with hypertension.
Batisky, DL; Blumer, JL; Delucchi, A; Hand, E; Hogg, RJ; Lo, MW; Panebianco, D; Rippley, R; Sakihara, G; Shahinfar, S; Shaw, W; Tenney, F; Vogt, BA; Wells, TG, 2007
)
0.34
" In conclusion, both pharmacodynamic and -kinetic factors account for the non-response to lisinopril."( Therapeutic resistance to angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition is related to pharmacodynamic and -kinetic factors in 5/6 nephrectomized rats.
de Zeeuw, D; Henning, RH; Hut, F; Jeronimus-Stratingh, CM; Kluppel, CA; van Dokkum, RP; Windt, WA, 2008
)
0.35
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
" The primary pharmacodynamic parameters were baseline-adjusted 24-hour mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure."( The effect of exenatide on lisinopril pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in patients with hypertension.
Kothare, P; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, M; Park, S, 2009
)
0.35
" The method described herein was fully validated and successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study of lisinopril tablets in healthy male volunteers after oral administration."( Quantitative determination of lisinopril in human plasma by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and its application in a pharmacokinetic study.
Jing, L; Li, F; Qin, F; Wang, D; Xiong, Z; Yang, S, 2012
)
0.38
"The present study was designed as an open label, multiple-dose, randomized, parallel trial to evaluate the pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction of lisinopril and concomitantly administered diclofenac sodium in non-diabetic and diabetic, mild to moderate hypertensive, osteoarthritic patients."( Potential pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction between concomitantly administered lisinopril and diclofenac sodium: a call for appropriate management in hypertensive osteoarthritic patients.
Chudasama, H; Goswami, SK; Jain, S; Santani, D, 2011
)
0.37
" This method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study after oral administration of a dose (150 mg) of ranitidine."( A sensitive and rapid determination of ranitidine in human plasma by HPLC with fluorescence detection and its application for a pharmacokinetic study.
Tuncel, M; Ulu, ST, 2012
)
0.38
" In this study, we have analysed the ex vivo domain selectivity and pharmacokinetic profile of LisW-S."( Pharmacokinetic evaluation of lisinopril-tryptophan, a novel C-domain ACE inhibitor.
Chibale, K; Davies, NH; Denti, P; Gibhard, L; Kröger, WL; Mahajan, A; Njoroge, M; Schwager, SL; Sharp, SK; Smit, I; Sturrock, ED; Wiesner, L, 2014
)
0.4
" We conducted a multicenter, open-label pharmacokinetic (PK) study of daily oral lisinopril in 22 children (ages 7-17 years) with stable kidney transplant function."( Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Lisinopril in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Patients: Implications for Starting Dose Selection.
Anand, R; Feig, DI; Frymoyer, A; Gipson, DS; Goebel, JW; Greenbaum, LA; Lewandowski, A; Lewis, K; Patel, UD; Schwartz, GJ; Trachtman, H; Warady, BA, 2015
)
0.42
" A cellular pharmacokinetic model integrating resveratrol transport/metabolism with glucuronide hydrolysis/excretion was well fitted to the experimental data, allowing derivation of the efflux rate constant values in the absence or presence of shRNA targeting MRP4."( Efflux Transport Characterization of Resveratrol Glucuronides in UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 Transfected HeLa Cells: Application of a Cellular Pharmacokinetic Model to Decipher the Contribution of Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 4.
Dong, D; Li, F; Quan, E; Wang, S; Wu, B, 2016
)
0.43
"This study aimed to assess the pediatric lisinopril doses using an adult physiological based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model."( Prediction of lisinopril pediatric dose from the reference adult dose by employing a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model.
Abbas, N; Arafat, M; Bukhari, NI; Hussain, A; Rashid, M; Rasool, MF; Sadiq, MW; Sarfraz, M, 2020
)
0.56
" The findings of previous real time pharmacokinetic studies in pediatric patients supported the present simulated dose."( Prediction of lisinopril pediatric dose from the reference adult dose by employing a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model.
Abbas, N; Arafat, M; Bukhari, NI; Hussain, A; Rashid, M; Rasool, MF; Sadiq, MW; Sarfraz, M, 2020
)
0.56

Compound-Compound Interactions

The effects on plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme activity and renin activity of lisinopril and enalapril, alone and in combination with propranolol were studied.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" L/HCTZ appears to be a well-tolerated combination with efficacy on once-daily dosing superior to that of C/HCTZ."( Treating mild-to-moderate hypertension: a comparison of lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide fixed combination with captopril and hydrochlorothiazide free combination.
Graham, RD, 1991
)
0.28
"In an open, crossover study, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of lisinopril and enalapril, administered alone and in combination with propranolol, were evaluated in 12 volunteers."( Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lisinopril and enalapril, alone and in combination with propranolol.
Bendtsen, F; Henriksen, JH, 1989
)
0.28
"The effects on plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme activity and renin activity of the two long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, lisinopril and enalapril, alone and in combination with propranolol were studied."( Effects on plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme activity and circulating renin of lisinopril and enalapril alone and in combination with propranolol in healthy volunteers.
Bendtsen, F; Hansen, EF; Henriksen, JH, 1999
)
0.3
"To compare candesartan cilexetil and lisinopril in fixed combination with hydrochlorothiazide with respect to antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability."( Comparison of the AT1-receptor blocker, candesartan cilexetil, and the ACE inhibitor, lisinopril, in fixed combination with low dose hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients.
Istad, H; Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, S; McInnes, GT; O'Kane, KP; Van Mierlo, HF, 2000
)
0.31
" Four variants of the course treatment were used: 1) monotherapy with enalapril maleate (2 mg twice a day); 2) enalapril maleate (5 mg twice a day) in combination with NSAID; 3) monotherapy with lisinopril (10 mg once a day); 4) lisinopril (10 mg once a day in combination with NSAID."( [Antihypertensive effect of enalapril and lisinopril administered in combination with nonsteroid anti-inflammatory agents].
Brodskaia, SA; Ivanov, SN; Savenkov, MP, 2001
)
0.31
" We wished to determine the cardioprotective actions of an aminopeptidase P inhibitor, apstatin alone and in combination with enalapril/lisinopril/ramipril in an in vivo rat model of acute ischemia (30 min) and reperfusion (4 h)."( Infarct size limiting effect of apstatin alone and in combination with enalapril, lisinopril and ramipril in rats with experimental myocardial infarction.
Akula, A; Kota, MK; Routhu, KV; Veeravalli, KK, 2003
)
0.32
" Although the participation of the particular transporters in observed drug-drug interactions can be difficult to confirm in humans, this review focuses mainly on pharmacokinetic interactions of clinically important drugs."( Transporter-mediated Drug Interactions.
Tsuji, A, 2002
)
0.31
" In this randomized double-blind study we investigated renin-angiotensin system blockade obtained with 3 doses of olmesartan medoxomil (20, 40, and 80 mg every day) in 30 normal subjects and compared it with that obtained with lisinopril alone (20 mg every day) or combined with olmesartan medoxomil (20 or 40 mg)."( Sustained 24-hour blockade of the renin-angiotensin system: a high dose of a long-acting blocker is as effective as a lower dose combined with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.
Brunner, HR; Burnier, M; Forclaz, A; Hasler, C; Maillard, M; Nussberger, J, 2005
)
0.33
" By contrast, renal damage was aggravated when PM was combined with ACEi."( Adverse renal effects of the AGE inhibitor pyridoxamine in combination with ACEi in non-diabetic adriamycin-induced renal damage in rats.
Navis, G; van Goor, H; Waanders, F, 2008
)
0.35
"In patients with hypertension and metabolic syndrome, manidipine, both alone and in combination with the ACE inhibitor lisinopril, is significantly superior to amlodipine for improving insulin sensitivity as well as several metabolic, inflammatory and prothrombotic markers."( Effects of manidipine and its combination with an ACE inhibitor on insulin sensitivity and metabolic, inflammatory and prothrombotic markers in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome: the MARCADOR study.
Comi-Diaz, C; Macias-Batista, A; Martinez-Martin, FJ; Pedrianes-Martin, P; Rodriguez-Rosas, H; Soriano-Perera, P, 2011
)
0.37
"The present study was designed as an open label, multiple-dose, randomized, parallel trial to evaluate the pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction of lisinopril and concomitantly administered diclofenac sodium in non-diabetic and diabetic, mild to moderate hypertensive, osteoarthritic patients."( Potential pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction between concomitantly administered lisinopril and diclofenac sodium: a call for appropriate management in hypertensive osteoarthritic patients.
Chudasama, H; Goswami, SK; Jain, S; Santani, D, 2011
)
0.37
"The hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) influence the pharmacokinetics of several drug classes and are involved in many clinical drug-drug interactions."( Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
Artursson, P; Haglund, U; Karlgren, M; Kimoto, E; Lai, Y; Norinder, U; Vildhede, A; Wisniewski, JR, 2012
)
0.38
"The aim of the study was to estimate the efficacy of lysinopril (and/or its combination with hydrochlorothiazide) in terms of alteration of the diurnal AP profile and heart rhythm in patients with essential hypertension (EH)."( [The efficacy of lysinopril (and/or its combination with hydrochlorothiazide) in patients with essential hypertension].
Kakhramanova, SM, 2012
)
0.38
"In this study we report on potential drug-drug interactions between drugs occurring in patient clinical data."( Using semantic predications to uncover drug-drug interactions in clinical data.
Cairelli, MJ; Fiszman, M; Kilicoglu, H; Melton, GB; Pakhomov, SV; Rindflesch, TC; Rosemblat, G; Zhang, R, 2014
)
0.4
" We now investigated the effects of carnosine treatment alone and in combination with ACE inhibition, a clinically established nephroprotective drug in diabetic nephropathy."( Carnosine treatment in combination with ACE inhibition in diabetic rats.
Benck, U; Braunagel, M; Hammes, HP; Hauske, S; Höger, S; Köppel, H; Krämer, BK; Lanthaler, B; Peters, V; Pfister, F; Riedl, E; Schmitt, CP; Yard, BA; Zschocke, J, 2014
)
0.4
"Five clinical pharmacology studies evaluated the potential drug-drug interaction between multiple subcutaneous taspoglutide doses and a single dose of lisinopril, warfarin, and simvastatin and multiple doses of digoxin and an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel."( Assessment of Drug-Drug Interactions between Taspoglutide, a Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonist, and Drugs Commonly Used in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results of Five Phase I Trials.
Bogman, K; Brumm, J; Giraudon, M; Hofmann, C; Mangold, B; Niggli, M; Sauter, A; Schmitt, C; Sturm, S; Sturm-Pellanda, C, 2019
)
0.51
" Participants were divided into six treatment groups based on the hypertensive drug therapy they were using; lisinopril, losartan or valsartan alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (A, B and C group respectively) or combination of lisinopril, losartan or valsartan with/without hydrochlorothiazide together with amlodipine (D, E and F respectively)."( Effects of Different Antihypertensive Drug Combinations on Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness.
Hebibovic, S; Jatic, Z; Rustempasic, E; Skopljak, A; Sukalo, A; Valjevac, A, 2019
)
0.51
"These data suggest that lisinopril/lisinopril + hydrochlorothiazide, losartan/losartan + hydrochlorothiazide and valsartan/valsartan + hydrochlorothiazide alone or in combination with amlodipine are equally effective and well tolerated for the reduction of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure and improve arterial stiffness in patients with essential hypertension."( Effects of Different Antihypertensive Drug Combinations on Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness.
Hebibovic, S; Jatic, Z; Rustempasic, E; Skopljak, A; Sukalo, A; Valjevac, A, 2019
)
0.51
"This study aimed to estimate how prevalent potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) were in patients with cardiovascular diseases who were hospitalized for more than 24 hours, and to determine the risk factors associated with these pDDIs."( Detection and analysis of potential drug-drug interactions among patients admitted to the cardiac care unit in a tertiary care hospital.
Almaghaslah, D; Khaled, A; Makki, S; Nagib, R; Siddiqua, A, 2023
)
0.91

Bioavailability

Lisinopril bioavailability (approximately 25%) is not significantly affected by food, age, or coadministration of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), propranolol, digoxin, and glibenclamide. This finding was concurrent with significantly increased serum bioavailability of nitric oxide in the hypertensive rats treated with L-arginine and lisinopil. Compound 2 is well absorbed from rat jejunum, whereas lisinobril absorption is relatively low.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" This apparent tissue selectivity may stem from either differences in tissue bioavailability or from a different affinity for the enzyme."( Differences in structure of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors might predict differences in action.
Herman, AG, 1992
)
0.28
" Lisinopril bioavailability (approximately 25%) is not significantly affected by food, age, or coadministration of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), propranolol, digoxin, and glibenclamide."( The clinical pharmacology of lisinopril.
Cirillo, VJ; Gomez, HJ; Moncloa, F, 1987
)
0.27
" Its bioavailability is approximately 25% and is not affected by food."( Lisinopril: a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.
Chase, SL; Sutton, JD, 1989
)
0.28
" Although hydralazine had no effect on the bioavailability of enalapril, significantly increased bioavailability was observed with lisinopril."( Comparative pharmacokinetics of enalapril and lisinopril, alone and with hydralazine.
Drummer, OH; Froomes, P; McLean, AJ; McNeil, JJ; Smith, HJ, 1989
)
0.28
" Compound 2 is well absorbed from rat jejunum, whereas lisinopril absorption is relatively low."( Intestinal absorption mechanism of dipeptide angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors of the lysyl-proline type: lisinopril and SQ 29,852.
Amidon, GL; Friedman, DI, 1989
)
0.28
"The angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril, has an oral bioavailability of 25 percent +/- 4 percent, which is unaffected by food."( Pharmacokinetics of lisinopril.
Beermann, B, 1988
)
0.27
" Although there were no statistically significant differences in lisinopril pharmacokinetics during single or combined treatment, serum and urinary parameters suggest that bioavailability may be enhanced slightly during combined treatment."( A study of the potential pharmacokinetic interaction of lisinopril and digoxin in normal volunteers.
Dews, IM; Kelly, JG; Marks, C; Morris, F; Stephens, JD; Vandenburg, MJ, 1988
)
0.27
" A population pharmacokinetic analysis approach applied to a few concentration-time data points in each of a relatively large number of subjects provided average population parameter estimates of the absorption rate constant, volume of distribution and clearance which correspond closely with the limited published data based on conventional pharmacokinetic approaches."( Pharmacodynamics and population pharmacokinetics of enalapril and lisinopril.
Ajayi, AA; Campbell, BC; Howie, C; Kelman, AW; Meredith, PA; Reid, JL, 1985
)
0.27
"A randomized, two-way, crossover study was performed on 18 normal volunteers to assess the influence of food on the bioavailability of lisinopril, (1-[N2-[(S)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-L-lysyl]-L-proline), a long-acting nonsulfhydryl angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor."( Effect of food on the bioavailability of lisinopril, a nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.
Clementi, RA; Ferguson, RK; Hoholick, C; Mojaverian, P; Rocci, ML; Vlasses, PH, 1986
)
0.27
"The aim of the present studies, performed in two different groups of volunteers, was to compare the bioavailability of 20 mg lisinopril tablets (Sinopryl as test and an orignator product as reference formulation; study 1) and lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide (20 mg/12."( Effect of the combination of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide on the bioequivalence of tablet formulations.
Alpan, RS; Erenmemisoglu, A; Koytchev, R; Ozalp, Y; van der Meer, MJ, 2004
)
0.32
" These "in combo" PAMPA data were used to predict the human absolute bioavailability of the ampholytes."( The permeation of amphoteric drugs through artificial membranes--an in combo absorption model based on paracellular and transmembrane permeability.
Avdeef, A; Sun, N; Tam, KY; Tsinman, O, 2010
)
0.36
"Oral bioavailability (F) is a product of fraction absorbed (Fa), fraction escaping gut-wall elimination (Fg), and fraction escaping hepatic elimination (Fh)."( Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
Chang, G; El-Kattan, A; Miller, HR; Obach, RS; Rotter, C; Steyn, SJ; Troutman, MD; Varma, MV, 2010
)
0.36
"Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors differ in their lipophilic/hydrophilic index that determines their tissue bioavailability and affinity to ACE, which may result in major differences in the degree of blockade of cardiac ACE."( Effects of ACE inhibitors on cardiac angiotensin II and aldosterone in humans: "Relevance of lipophilicity and affinity for ACE".
Coletta, E; Davies, R; Haddad, H; Leenen, FH; Ruzicka, M; White, R, 2010
)
0.36
" The bioavailability of compound 4j was determined in experimental mice."( Design, synthesis, and antihypertensive activity of curcumin-inspired compounds via ACE inhibition and vasodilation, along with a bioavailability study for possible benefit in cardiovascular diseases.
Dong, XB; Du, ZM; Guo, Y; Hu, X; Liao, LZ; Liao, XX; Wang, LC; Zhuang, XD, 2016
)
0.43
" These results suggest that the extent of intestinal absorption of lisinopril was significantly impaired in the presence of GTE, whereas it had no major effect on the absorption rate and renal excretion of lisinopril."( Impact of Green Tea Catechin Ingestion on the Pharmacokinetics of Lisinopril in Healthy Volunteers.
Abe, O; Misaka, S; Ogata, H; Ono, T; Ono, Y; Onoue, S; Sato, H; Shikama, Y; Shimomura, K; Suzuki, M; Uchida, A, 2021
)
0.62
" This finding was concurrent with significantly increased serum bioavailability of nitric oxide in the hypertensive rats treated with L-arginine and lisinopril."( L-arginine and lisinopril supplementation protects against sodium fluoride-induced nephrotoxicity and hypertension by suppressing mineralocorticoid receptor and angiotensin-converting enzyme 3 activity.
Adedapo, AA; Adedapo, AD; Adejumobi, OA; Adetona, MO; Ajibade, TO; Aro, AO; Awodele, OA; Kayoka-Kabongo, PN; McGaw, LJ; Nkadimeng, SM; Oguntibeju, OO; Ola-Davies, OE; Omobowale, TO; Oyagbemi, AA; Saba, AB; Tijani, MO; Yakubu, MA, 2023
)
0.91
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51

Dosage Studied

The contemporary work describes a rapid and cost effective reversed phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography (RP-HPLC) method for the quantification of Captopril, Lisinopril and Dexibuprofen. After 12 weeks of therapy with lisinopril,. the dosage of which was titrated to produce optimal relief of symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF), repeat hemodynamic studies revealed persistent significant reductions in baseline systemic arterial pressure.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" It remains to be documented whether the persistence and degree of ACE inhibition is a factor in this effect, and, thus, comparison of short- with long-acting ACE inhibitors and study of the dosage of ACE inhibitors are of importance."( Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, the sympathetic nervous system, and congestive heart failure. The Australian Zestril (Lisinopril) Study Group.
Sloman, G, 1992
)
0.28
"01) from baseline over the 24 h dosing interval."( Twenty-four hour blood pressure effect of once-daily lisinopril, enalapril, and placebo in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.
Dunne, B; Glazer, N; Kostis, JB; Miller, WE; Rector, DJ; Tresznewsky, ON; Whelton, A, 1992
)
0.28
" This reaction to ACE inhibitors appears to be dose related, and subsides with a decreased dosage or discontinuation of the medication."( Lisinopril-induced "scalded mouth syndrome".
Haushalter, NM; Savino, LB, 1992
)
0.28
" In order to investigate whether there is a causal relationship between plasminogen-activator activity and smooth muscle cell migration, animals were dosed with tranexamic acid."( The role of plasminogen activation in smooth muscle cell migration after arterial injury.
Jackson, CL; Reidy, MA, 1992
)
0.28
" After a 2 week placebo, the examinees were administered either L in increasing dose of 10, 20, or 40 mg per day (amount necessary to achieve normotension), or C in a dosage of 25, 50, or 100 mg per day."( [Comparison of captopril and lisinopril in the treatment of mild and moderate hypertension].
Janezic, A; Knezević, S; Lijić, J; Marinković, M; Rumboldt, Z; Simunić, M,
)
0.13
" An evaluation of reduction in blood pressure, and of response rate and side-effects suggests that an initial dose of 10 mg lisinopril once daily is sufficient, and that this dosage will control blood pressure in the majority of patients."( [Treatment of hypertension with the ACE inhibitor lisinopril. A multicenter study of patients with mild to moderate hypertension in general practice].
Fagerthun, HE; Landmark, K; Larsen, S; Tellnes, G, 1991
)
0.28
" L/HCTZ appears to be a well-tolerated combination with efficacy on once-daily dosing superior to that of C/HCTZ."( Treating mild-to-moderate hypertension: a comparison of lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide fixed combination with captopril and hydrochlorothiazide free combination.
Graham, RD, 1991
)
0.28
" Dosing with hydrochlorothiazide alone resulted in a mean peak serum concentration of 53 ng/ml, 2-6 hours post dose."( The pharmacokinetics of co-administered lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide.
Swaisland, AJ, 1991
)
0.28
" The pharmacokinetic behaviour of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide given together to elderly and renally impaired hypertensive patients suggests that a fixed dose combination is appropriate and that no changes to the dosage regimen additional to those used for the individual agents are necessary."( The effects of age and renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of co-administered lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide.
Connell, PA; Hosie, J; Laher, MS; Mulkerrins, E; Smith, RP; Swaisland, AJ, 1991
)
0.28
" During consecutive dosing of lisinopril, its antihypertensive effects were sustained for greater than or equal to 12 h with less diurnal variation of BP."( Pharmacokinetics and antihypertensive effects of lisinopril in hypertensive patients with normal and impaired renal function.
Abe, Y; Ebina, T; Gotoh, E; Ishii, M; Matsukawa, T; Minamisawa, K; Shionoiri, H; Sugimoto, K; Ueda, S, 1990
)
0.28
" For the 47 patients randomized, data were collected for 25 patients switched to an equal milligram dosage of lisinopril and for 21 patients who continued to receive a constant dosage of enalapril."( Cost of switching hypertensive patients from enalapril maleate to lisinopril.
Goodfriend, TL; Lindgren-Furmaga, EM; Schuna, AA; Wolff, NL, 1991
)
0.28
" The dose should be adjusted to the pretreatment GFR, and a decrease in dosage should be considered with prolonged treatment."( Lisinopril in hypertensive patients with renal function impairment.
Apperloo, AJ; de Jong, PE; de Zeeuw, D; Heeg, JE, 1990
)
0.28
" A similar elimination profile was observed when the compound was dosed in its active form (FPL 63547 diacid), 87."( Preferential biliary elimination of FPL 63547, a novel inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme, in the rat.
Carr, RD; Cooper, AE; Hutchinson, R; Mann, J; O'Connor, SE; Robinson, DH; Wells, E, 1990
)
0.28
" Lisinopril seems to be at least as effective as captopril in congestive heart failure, and it has over the latter the advantage of a once a day dosage therapy."( [The value of lysinopril in cardiac insufficiency].
Lambert, M; Luccioni, R, 1990
)
0.28
" Arterial blood pressure was monitored continuously for 6 h following each dosage using an intraarterial cannula."( Hemodynamic, hormonal, and pharmacokinetic aspects of treatment with lisinopril in congestive heart failure.
Dickstein, K, 1987
)
0.27
" After a 2-week run-in period, 130 patients receiving digoxin and/or diuretics were randomised to 12 weeks of treatment with lisinopril 5 mg daily (87 patients) or with placebo (43 patients), with an option to increase lisinopril dosage to 10 or 20 mg."( Placebo-controlled study of lisinopril in congestive heart failure: a multicentre study.
Chalmers, JP; Cyran, J; De La Torre, D; Englert, M; Kramar, M; Lewis, GR; Maranhao, MF; Myburgh, DP; Schuster, P; West, MJ, 1987
)
0.27
"5 mg orally, was given every 24 h initially; in six patients, dosage was decreased to an alternate or once-a-week schedule, because of a hypotensive effect during dialysis."( Treatment of hypertension with lisinopril in end-stage renal failure.
Bellucci, A; Küntziger, HE; Pouthier, D, 1987
)
0.27
" A dose-response relation for most parameters was noted."( Lisinopril for severe congestive heart failure.
Amin, D; LeJemtel, T; Levine, TB; Liang, CS; Linnemaier, T; Shah, PK; Shaver, JA; Uretsky, BF; Walinsky, P, 1989
)
0.28
" After 12 weeks of therapy with lisinopril, the dosage of which was titrated to produce optimal relief of symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF), repeat hemodynamic studies revealed persistent significant reductions in baseline systemic arterial pressure, pulmonary artery wedge pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance."( Hemodynamic effects of lisinopril after long-term administration in congestive heart failure.
Amin, DK; Langendörfer, A; Liang, CS; Linnemeier, TJ; Rush, JE; Shah, PK; Snapinn, SM; Stone, CK; Uretsky, BF, 1989
)
0.28
" The usual initial oral dosage of lisinopril is 10 mg once a day (range 20-40 mg/day)."( Lisinopril: a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.
Chase, SL; Sutton, JD, 1989
)
0.28
" Lisinopril treatment reduced supine and standing cuff clinic measurements of BP 24 h after dosing by (systolic/diastolic) 21."( Assessment of the antihypertensive effect of lisinopril using 24-hour ambulatory monitoring.
Conte, D; Herpin, D, 1989
)
0.28
" These properties are consistent with once-daily dosing and uncomplicated clinical use in the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure."( The clinical pharmacology of lisinopril.
Case, DE, 1989
)
0.28
" There was a linear dose-response relationship for both supine and erect blood pressure."( Lisinopril dose-response relationship in essential hypertension.
Chrysant, SG; Cirillo, VJ; Gomez, HJ; Gradman, AH; Leon, AS; MacCarthy, EP; Otterbein, ES; Rush, JE; Shaw, WC; Sromovsky, JA, 1989
)
0.28
" In ex vivo dose-response and time-course studies, the inhibitory effects of the seven drugs on tissue ACEs and their relative distributions to SHR tissues were compared following oral administration."( Comparisons in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo of the actions of seven structurally diverse inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE).
Cushman, DW; DeForrest, JM; Fung, WC; Grover, GJ; Harvey, CM; Mitch, SL; Scalese, RJ; Wang, FL, 1989
)
0.28
"If optimal dosage administration schedules are to be defined, the factors that influence the disposition of a drug in the population of patients who are likely to receive it should first be determined."( Population pharmacokinetics of lisinopril in hypertensive patients.
Thomson, AH; Whiting, B, 1987
)
0.27
" The dosage of lisinopril was titrated upward to 40 mg daily according to BP response."( Lisinopril treatment of hypertension in patients with impaired renal function.
Cooper, WD; Donohoe, JF; Doyle, GD; Glover, DR; Laher, M; Long, C, 1987
)
0.27
" Prolonged duration of action of lisinopril allows once daily dosing, unlike captopril for which dosing is required every 8-12 hours or enalapril which may necessitate twice daily dosing."( Lisinopril: a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.
Armayor, GM; Lopez, LM, 1988
)
0.27
" The changes were present up to 24 hours after dosing for most parameters."( Modulation of hemodynamic effects with a converting enzyme inhibitor: acute hemodynamic dose-response relationship of a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril, with observations on long-term clinical, functional, and biochemical responses
Amin, D; LeJemtel, T; Levine, TB; Liang, CS; Linnemeier, T; Rush, JE; Shah, PK; Shaver, JA; Uretsky, BF; Walinsky, P, 1988
)
0.27
" Lisinopril reduced systolic blood pressure and inhibited serum ACE activity in both normal and diabetic rats in a dose-response fashion."( Effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril, on normal and diabetic rats.
Hartmann, JF; Hayes, NS; Keegan, ME; Slater, EE; Szemplinski, M, 1988
)
0.27
"The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical use, adverse effects, and dosage of lisinopril are reviewed."( Lisinopril: a nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.
Murray, KM; Noble, TA, 1988
)
0.27
" The design of dosage regimens of both lisinopril and enalapril for patients with severe renal impairment or chronic renal failure should take into consideration the use and effects of haemodialysis."( Pharmacokinetics of lisinopril, enalapril and enalaprilat in renal failure: effects of haemodialysis.
Carmody, M; Cooper, WD; Doyle, GD; Glover, DR; Kelly, JG, 1988
)
0.27
" Both drugs reduced blood pressure without change in heart rate after acute dosing and after seven days."( Acute and chronic effects of the converting enzyme inhibitors enalapril and lisinopril on reflex control of heart rate in normotensive man.
Ajayi, AA; Campbell, BC; Howie, CA; Reid, JL, 1985
)
0.27
" Population drug concentration data obtained in the course of early clinical evaluations of new drugs may provide a rational basis for dosage regimens with improved efficacy and, in particular, reduced concentration-related toxic effects."( Pharmacodynamics and population pharmacokinetics of enalapril and lisinopril.
Ajayi, AA; Campbell, BC; Howie, C; Kelman, AW; Meredith, PA; Reid, JL, 1985
)
0.27
" In patients with severe renal failure, adjustment of the dose or the dosing frequency to the degree of renal failure is recommended to avoid administration of doses in excess of those required to achieve adequate inhibition of converting enzyme."( Lisinopril in hypertensive patients with and without renal failure.
Boer, P; Geyskes, GG; van Schaik, BA, 1987
)
0.27
" Serum profiles after chronic dosing of enalapril show little accumulation of the active diacid metabolite, enalaprilat."( Kinetic and metabolic aspects of enalapril action.
Lant, AF; McNabb, RW; Noormohamed, FH, 1984
)
0.27
" All patients were New York Heart Association Functional Class II, III, or IV and had remained symptomatic despite optimal dosing with digoxin and diuretics."( Lisinopril versus placebo in the treatment of heart failure: the Lisinopril Heart Failure Study Group.
Beller, B; Bourge, RC; Bulle, T; Colfer, H; Fisher, MB; Fowles, RE; Giles, TD; Grover, J; Jessup, M; Whipple, JP, 1995
)
0.29
" At the end of both periods, sphygmomanometric blood pressure was assessed 24 hours after dosing and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure was performed, taking blood pressure readings every 15 minutes during day- and night-time."( [The antihypertensive effects of the lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide combination (Zestoretic) in elderly hypertensive patients. The results of a multicenter study. The Italian Zestoretic Study Group].
Mancia, G, 1994
)
0.29
" However, the search for the optimal dosage was not undertaken in these trials (a standard dose was fixed at the onset, average dose of enalapril from 15 to 20 mg/day)."( [The ATLAS study (Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril and Survival); justification and objectives].
Komajda, M; Thibout, E; Wimart, MC, 1994
)
0.29
" The differences were most marked 19-24 hours post dosage time when pressures (systolic/diastolic) during lisinopril therapy were lower than during captopril by 18."( Once daily lisinopril and captopril in hypertension: a double blind comparison using ambulatory monitoring.
Mann, S; O'Brien, KP, 1994
)
0.29
"In this study, lisinopril proved a more effective once daily antihypertensive agent than captopril, especially in the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosage interval."( Once daily lisinopril and captopril in hypertension: a double blind comparison using ambulatory monitoring.
Mann, S; O'Brien, KP, 1994
)
0.29
" Significantly more patients were dosed on a twice daily regimen of enalapril than lisinopril."( A multi-center analysis of the use of enalapril and lisinopril in elderly hypertensive patients.
Cotsonis, G; Douglas, MB; Hall, WD; Hawkins, DW, 1994
)
0.29
" Evaluation criteria were efficacy, clinical experience, safety, dosage interval, hepatic bioactivation, interactions, dosage forms and cost."( Decision analysis applied to the selection of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
Atienza Fernández, M; Carvajal Gragera, E; Piña Vera, MJ; Santos Ramos, B, 1993
)
0.29
" Increases in dosage caused very little increase in haemodynamic effect, suggesting that complete suppression of the angiotensin-converting enzyme may not be necessary for an optimal clinical response."( Acute haemodynamic effects of lisinopril and captopril in patients with severe congestive heart failure.
Byttebier, G; Van Hedent, T; Van Mieghem, W, 1993
)
0.29
"05) shifted the dose-response relationship of ammonium persulfate-induced reduction in cardiac contractile frequency."( Lisinopril increases the recovery during reoxygenation and resistance to oxidative damage in cardiomyocytes.
Rabkin, SW, 1993
)
0.29
" On the other hand, both, systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased satisfactory during the night with the dosage received in the morning."( [The antihypertensive effect of lisinopril in a single daily dosage. A study of arterial pressure with ambulatory monitoring].
Galván Montiel, O; González Romero, S; Guadalajara Boo, JF,
)
0.13
"This study examined the effects of lisinopril on diastolic function in 12 normotensive patients (mean age 72 years) with symptomatic congestive heart failure, intact left ventricular systolic function and abnormal diastolic function secondary to ischaemic heart disease in a placebo-controlled double blind crossover study, with each treatment dosed orally for 5 continuous weeks."( Effects of lisinopril on congestive heart failure in normotensive patients with diastolic dysfunction but intact systolic function.
Kennedy, N; Lang, CC; Lipworth, BJ; McAlpine, HM; Rahman, AR; Struthers, AD, 1995
)
0.29
"To provide clinical support that conversion from captopril to lisinopril at a daily oral dosage ratio of 5:1 maintains comparable therapeutic efficacy, and to estimate retrospectively cost savings because of conversion from captopril to lisinopril therapy at the study site and with the associated overall drug conversion program instituted by Kaiser Permanente."( Conversions from captopril to lisinopril at a dosage ratio of 5:1 result in comparable control of hypertension.
Gill, TH; Hauter, F; Pelter, MA, 1996
)
0.29
"The blood pressures of patients in whom captopril therapy was switched to lisinopril therapy were maintained throughout the entire study within the defined acceptable limits of control when the conversion was initiated at a daily oral dosage ratio of 5:1."( Conversions from captopril to lisinopril at a dosage ratio of 5:1 result in comparable control of hypertension.
Gill, TH; Hauter, F; Pelter, MA, 1996
)
0.29
"The conversion from captopril (in equally divided daily doses) to lisinopril (once daily) at a dosage ratio of 5:1 maintained comparable control of mild-to-moderate hypertension with no increase in adverse effects."( Conversions from captopril to lisinopril at a dosage ratio of 5:1 result in comparable control of hypertension.
Gill, TH; Hauter, F; Pelter, MA, 1996
)
0.29
" An incremental dose-response effect was observed both in clinic and ambulatory blood pressure parameters during treatment with mibefradil and nifedipine GITS alone and combined with lisinopril."( The antihypertensive efficacy of the novel calcium antagonist mibefradil in comparison with nifedipine GITS in moderate to severe hypertensives with ambulatory hypertension.
Archambault, F; Dalle Ave, S; Lacourcière, Y; Lefebvre, J; Lindberg, E; Poirier, L; Ward, C, 1997
)
0.3
" The renal dysfunction induced by simultaneous administration of lisinopril with PAN could be abolished by combination dosing with sarcosine, an angiotensin II (AII)-receptor agonist."( Dual effects of lisinopril on puromycin aminonucleoside nephrosis in unilaterally nephrectomized rats.
Kurihara, H; Shinosaki, T; Sunagawa, N; Takagawa, I; Yonetani, Y, 1997
)
0.3
" Significant dose-response differences were observed between treatments."( Lisinopril versus hydrochlorothiazide in obese hypertensive patients: a multicenter placebo-controlled trial. Treatment in Obese Patients With Hypertension (TROPHY) Study Group.
Anzalone, DA; Falkner, B; Hutchinson, HG; Reisin, E; Tuck, ML; Weir, MR, 1997
)
0.3
"5 mg combination is more effective during the last period of the dosing interval."( [Comparison of antihypertensive and metabolic effects of lisinopril 20 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg fixed combination and captopril 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg fixed combination].
Baleydier, A; Milon, H,
)
0.13
"Thirty THM aged 12 weeks were distributed equally to a lisinopril dosage group, a hydralazine dosage group, and an untreated group."( Tissue-localized angiotensin II enhances cardiac and renal disorders in Tsukuba hypertensive mice.
Fukamizu, A; Ishikawa, K; Kai, T; Kurooka, A; Murakami, K; Shimada, S; Sugimura, K; Takenaka, T, 1998
)
0.3
" Dosage could be increased for both telmisartan (40 --> 80 --> 160 mg) and lisinopril (10 --> 20 --> 40 mg) at each of the first 2 monthly visits if DBP control (<90 mm Hg) had not been established."( Comparison of telmisartan with lisinopril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.
Frishman, WH; Guthrie, G; Neutel, JM; Oparil, S; Papademitriou, V, 1999
)
0.3
" Vasoconstriction was induced by epinephrine in all groups in a dose-response fashion."( Vascular effects of epinephrine, lisinopril, and chlorpromazine in diabetic and non-diabetic rats.
Aygit, AC; Ayhan, MS; Demiralay, A; Yildirim, I, 1999
)
0.3
"To compare the serum pharmacokinetics of fosinoprilat with enalaprilat and lisinopril after 1 and 10 days of dosing with fosinopril, enalapril and lisinopril."( Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of fosinoprilat with enalaprilat and lisinopril in patients with congestive heart failure and chronic renal insufficiency.
Caspi, A; Greenbaum, R; Liao, WC; Mangold, B; Nouriel, H; O'Grady, P; Paz, R; Sclarovsky, S; Yee, KF; Zucchelli, P, 2000
)
0.31
" The proposed methods proved to be suitable for a rapid quality control of commercial dosage forms."( Spectrophotometric and spectrofluorometric methods for the assay of lisinopril in single and multicomponent pharmaceutical dosage forms.
Abdine, HH; El-Yazbi, FA; Shaalan, RA, 1999
)
0.3
"To be listed for heart transplantation (HTx), optimization of the dosage of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) -inhibitors is recommended worldwide even though this issue has not been thoroughly investigated in the pre-transplantation cohort."( ACE inhibitor dosage at the time of listing predicts survival.
Berger, R; Frey, B; Kozanly, I; Kuchling, G; Pacher, R; Stanek, B, 2000
)
0.31
" Earlier studies combining short acting drugs from these classes require multiple dosing and were associated with poor compliance."( Evaluation of amlodipine, lisinopril, and a combination in the treatment of essential hypertension.
Naidu, MU; Rao, TR; Shobha, JC; Usha, PR, 2000
)
0.31
" Single-dose combination antihypertension therapy is an important option that combines efficacy of blood pressure reduction and a low side effect profile with convenient once-daily dosing to enhance compliance."( Combination antihypertensive drugs: recommendations for use.
Beck, JD; Clark, M; Skolnik, NS, 2000
)
0.31
" In conclusion, this reappraisal of the conflicting observations reported on ACE inhibitor effects on exercise capacity has highlighted a proposition that there is an optimal dosage of ACE inhibitors which will most enhance exercise capacity, and this will require further well designed cross-over studies to elucidate."( Disparate results of ACE inhibitor dosage on exercise capacity in heart failure: a reappraisal of vasodilator therapy and study design.
Cooke, GA; Tan, LB; Williams, SG; Wright, DJ, 2001
)
0.31
"We sought to describe the dosages of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor prescribed to elderly patients with heart failure at hospital discharge, the factors associated with dosing level, and the association of these dosages with 1-year outcomes."( Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor dosages in elderly patients with heart failure.
Chen, YT; Krumholz, HM; Radford, MJ; Wang, Y, 2001
)
0.31
" We observed a dose-response relationship between higher doses and lower mortality."( Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor dosages in elderly patients with heart failure.
Chen, YT; Krumholz, HM; Radford, MJ; Wang, Y, 2001
)
0.31
" On the basis of the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) studies, it has been previously demonstrated that the antihypertensive effect of once daily drug, generally administrated in the morning, decreases at the end of the dosing period."( Management of antihypertensive treatment with Lisinopril: a chronotherapeutic approach.
Macchiarulo, C; Mitolo, DC; Pieri, R; Pirrelli, A,
)
0.13
" In contrast, urinary excretion rates of Ang I and Ang-(1-7) but not Ang II increased significantly throughout the dosing period of subjects who were given omapatrilat, whereas the smaller antihypertensive response produced by lisinopril had a smaller and transient effect on increasing urinary excretion rates of Ang-(1-7)."( Effects of omapatrilat on the renin-angiotensin system in salt-sensitive hypertension.
Brosnihan, B; Campese, VM; Chappell, MC; Ferrario, CM; Grim, CE; Liao, WC; Ruddy, MC; Smith, RD; Vesterqvist, O, 2002
)
0.31
" Telmisartan (40, 80, and 120 mg) provided greater decreases in mean hourly systolic and diastolic blood pressure throughout the 24-hour dosing interval, including the last 4 hours of the dosing period, than amlodipine (5 and 10 mg)."( Comparative effects of telmisartan in the treatment of hypertension.
White, WB,
)
0.13
"The aerobic exercise capacity (primary end-point) was significantly higher during the 5mg per day dosage compared to the 20 mg (1696 vs 1578 ml."( A mechanistic investigation of ACE inhibitor dose effects on aerobic exercise capacity in heart failure patients.
Al-Timman, JK; Cooke, GA; Marshall, P; Shelbourne, J; Tan, LB; Williams, SG; Wright, DJ, 2002
)
0.31
"5 mg) were evaluated for bioequivalence after single dosing in healthy volunteers."( Comparative bioavailability of two immediate-release tablets of lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide in healthy volunteers.
Cuadrado, A; Dalmau, R; Gascón, AR; Hernández, RM; Pedraz, JL; Ramírez, E; Solinís, MA, 2003
)
0.32
"This study explored the dose-response relationship and safety of lisinopril in 115 hypertensive children, aged 6 to 16 years."( A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study of the effectiveness and safety of lisinopril for children with hypertension.
Miller, K; Shahinfar, S; Soffer, B; Vogt, BA; Zhang, Z, 2003
)
0.32
"There was a dose-response relationship between the lowest and each of the higher doses of lisinopril."( A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study of the effectiveness and safety of lisinopril for children with hypertension.
Miller, K; Shahinfar, S; Soffer, B; Vogt, BA; Zhang, Z, 2003
)
0.32
"As the results of the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation trial suggested that patients with both coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes mellitus would benefit from angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy, our objective was to increase the percentage of patients with both of these conditions receiving the goal dosage (20 mg/day) or highest tolerated dosage of the ACE inhibitor lisinopril through intervention of a clinical pharmacy service."( Clinical pharmacy specialist implementation of lisinopril therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus.
Humphries, TL; McConnell, KJ; Merenich, JA; Raebel, MA, 2003
)
0.32
"At hospital discharge, lisinopril 5 mg/day was started in eligible patients; the drug was titrated to a goal dosage of 20 mg/day or the highest tolerated dosage."( Clinical pharmacy specialist implementation of lisinopril therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus.
Humphries, TL; McConnell, KJ; Merenich, JA; Raebel, MA, 2003
)
0.32
"The clinical pharmacy service more than doubled the number of patients with CAD and diabetes who achieved the goal dosage of an ACE inhibitor, a drug class that has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality in this patient population."( Clinical pharmacy specialist implementation of lisinopril therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus.
Humphries, TL; McConnell, KJ; Merenich, JA; Raebel, MA, 2003
)
0.32
" Increased ANP mRNA expression following doxorubicin dosing was localized predominantly in ventricular myocytes by in situ hybridization."( Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on delayed-onset doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.
Atkinson, J; Boucek, RJ; Miracle, A; Steele, A, 2003
)
0.32
"Two sensitive, simple and specific methods based on spectrophotometry and reversed-phase HPLC with fluorimetric detection are described for the determination of lisinopril in dosage forms as well as in spiked human plasma using solid phase extraction (SPE) procedures."( Determination of lisinopril in dosage forms and spiked human plasma through derivatization with 7-chloro-4-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (NBD-Cl) followed by spectrophotometry or HPLC with fluorimetric detection.
El-Ashry, SM; El-Emam, AA; El-Sherbiny, DT; Hansen, SH; Moustafa, MA, 2004
)
0.32
" Little is known about the stability of lisinopril in extemporaneously prepared liquid dosage forms."( Stability of lisinopril in two liquid dosage forms.
Morosco, RS; Nahata, MC, 2004
)
0.32
"Lisinopril can be prepared in either of 2 liquid dosage forms and stored for at least 13 weeks under refrigeration and 8 weeks at room temperature."( Stability of lisinopril in two liquid dosage forms.
Morosco, RS; Nahata, MC, 2004
)
0.32
" The aim of the study was to investigate dosing of ACE inhibitors in patients discharged from the hospital after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and, furthermore, to compare these doses with the doses actually reached in clinical trials."( The problem of underdosing of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is markedly overrated: results from a study of patients discharged from hospital after an acute myocardial infarction.
Kvan, E; Reikvam, A, 2004
)
0.32
" Outcome variables, including deaths and drug utilization with dosing after 6 months, were collected."( The problem of underdosing of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is markedly overrated: results from a study of patients discharged from hospital after an acute myocardial infarction.
Kvan, E; Reikvam, A, 2004
)
0.32
" Both the methods have been applied to the determination of lisinopril in pharmaceutical dosage forms."( Application of pi-acceptors to the spectrophotometric determination of lisinopril in commercial dosage forms.
Anwar, N; Kashif, M; Rahman, N,
)
0.13
" With a daily dosing regime, systolic BP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), diastolic BP, and pulse pressure (PP) were significantly lower in the lisinopril group compared to the placebo group at day 14 (P < ."( Lisinopril for the treatment of hypertension within the first 24 hours of acute ischemic stroke and follow-up.
Eveson, DJ; Potter, JF; Robinson, TG, 2007
)
0.34
" Whether these can be overcome simply by increasing drug dosage in non-responders should be investigated."( Therapeutic resistance to angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition is related to pharmacodynamic and -kinetic factors in 5/6 nephrectomized rats.
de Zeeuw, D; Henning, RH; Hut, F; Jeronimus-Stratingh, CM; Kluppel, CA; van Dokkum, RP; Windt, WA, 2008
)
0.35
" We can conclude that the results obtained in this study support an option of tablet splitting, which is very important for obtaining the required dosage when a dosage form of the required strength is unavailable, and for better individualization of the therapy."( Influence of tablet splitting on content uniformity of lisinopril/hydrochlorthiazide tablets.
Uzunović, A; Vranić, E, 2007
)
0.34
"Tablets are one of the most popular and preferred solid dosage forms because they can be accurately dosed, easily manufactured and packaged on a large scale, have good physical and chemical stability, and can contribute to good patient compliance given their ease of administration."( Comparison of some physical parameters of whole and scored lisinopril and lisinopril/hydrochlorthiazide tablets.
Uzunović, A; Vranić, E, 2008
)
0.35
" Exenatide delayed the time to attain maximum lisinopril concentration (tmax,ss) by 2 hours but did not significantly alter maximum lisinopril concentration (Cmax,ss) or area under the concentration-time profile (AUCtau,ss) over the 24-hour steady-state dosing interval."( The effect of exenatide on lisinopril pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in patients with hypertension.
Kothare, P; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, M; Park, S, 2009
)
0.35
"We obtained dose-response curve for the administration of complete extract and extract fractions."( Antihypertensive activity of Salvia elegans Vahl. (Lamiaceae): ACE inhibition and angiotensin II antagonism.
Badillo, FH; González-Cortazar, M; Herrera-Ruiz, M; Jiménez-Ferrer, E; Tortoriello, J, 2010
)
0.36
" Spearman correlation analyses indicated an inverse relationship between lisinopril dosage and number of polyps (P<0."( Long-term use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors is associated with decreased incidence of advanced adenomatous colon polyps.
Cipher, D; Kedika, R; Mahgoub, A; Patel, M; Pena Sahdala, HN; Siddiqui, AA, 2011
)
0.37
" This study's purpose was to determine whether an antihypertensive regimen including a maximally dosed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor could safely achieve target BP in indigent, predominantly minority patients with this disease."( Effective antihypertensive strategies for high-risk patients with diabetic nephropathy.
Adams-Huet, B; Toto, RD; Van Buren, PN, 2010
)
0.36
"A regimen using a maximally dosed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor is safe and effective for achieving BP goal in high-risk, predominantly minority patients with diabetic nephropathy."( Effective antihypertensive strategies for high-risk patients with diabetic nephropathy.
Adams-Huet, B; Toto, RD; Van Buren, PN, 2010
)
0.36
" When the dosage of prednisone was reduced, symptoms returned."( Autoimmune dysfunction and subsequent renal insufficiency in a collegiate female athlete: a case report.
Colandreo, RM; Kern, A; Leone, JE; Williamson, JD,
)
0.13
" The proposed approach was successfully applied to the analysis of pharmaceutical dosage forms with good accuracy and precision."( A novel analytical approach for reducing the consumption of organic solvents in the charge transfer-based spectrophotometric analysis: application in the analysis of certain antihypertensive drugs.
Al-Majed, AR; Darwish, IA; Mahmoud, AM, 2010
)
0.36
"To detect clinical predictors of renal worsening in CHF patient population characterized by two types of ACE-inhibitor dosing regimens."( ACE-inhibitor therapy at relatively high doses and risk of renal worsening in chronic heart failure.
Ariano, C; Cantatrione, S; Ciccarelli, A; Cioppa, C; De Vecchis, R; Di Biase, G; Giasi, A; Pucciarelli, A, 2011
)
0.37
" After screening 184 haemodialysis patients, 14 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, mainly long-term use of oral lisinopril in the upper end of dosage range for this population with stable haemoglobin levels and intravenous ESA therapy."( Lisinopril pharmacokinetics and erythropoietin requirement in haemodialysis patients.
Brunner, M; Herkner, H; Hörl, WH; Kletzmayr, J; Prehslauer, A; Sengoelge, G; Sunder-Plassmann, G; Winnicki, W, 2012
)
0.38
" An additional aim is to assess the effect of the polypill on LDL-c and BP compared to the administration of separate pills of identically dosed components of the polypill."( The evening versus morning polypill utilization study: the TEMPUS rationale and design.
Bots, ML; Grobbee, DE; Lafeber, M; Rodgers, A; Spiering, W; Thom, S; Visseren, FL; Webster, R, 2014
)
0.4
"5 mg) in the evening; (2) the polypill in the morning; and (3) the use of the identically dosed agents in separate pills taken at different time points during the day."( The evening versus morning polypill utilization study: the TEMPUS rationale and design.
Bots, ML; Grobbee, DE; Lafeber, M; Rodgers, A; Spiering, W; Thom, S; Visseren, FL; Webster, R, 2014
)
0.4
"A simple and rapid stability-indicating liquid chromatographic method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of lisinopril and hydrochlorotiazide (HCTZ) in drug substances and dosage forms in the presence of degradation products."( Stability-indicating LC method for the simultaneous determination of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide.
de Diego, M; Mennickent, S; Soto, J,
)
0.13
"Studies suggest that bedtime dosing of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker shows a more sustained and consistent 24-h antihypertensive profile, including greater night-time blood pressure (BP) reduction."( Time of administration important? Morning versus evening dosing of valsartan.
Crikelair, N; Kandra, A; Palatini, P; Zappe, DH, 2015
)
0.42
" Evening dosing also did not improve BP lowering in patients requiring add-on HCTZ or in nondippers at baseline."( Time of administration important? Morning versus evening dosing of valsartan.
Crikelair, N; Kandra, A; Palatini, P; Zappe, DH, 2015
)
0.42
"Once-daily dosing of valsartan 320 mg results in equally effective 24-h BP efficacy, regardless of dosing time."( Time of administration important? Morning versus evening dosing of valsartan.
Crikelair, N; Kandra, A; Palatini, P; Zappe, DH, 2015
)
0.42
" The floating bilayer tablets of lisinopril maleate and metoprolol tartrate were designed to overcome the various problems associated with conventional oral dosage form."( Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of floating bilayer tablet of lisinopril maleate and metoprolol tartrate.
Abdel-Daim, M; Danish, Z; Hanif, M; Ijaz, H; Mohammad, IS; Qureshi, J; Waheed, I; Zaman, M, 2015
)
0.42
" Group III was co-treated with GAR at a therapeutic dosage of 250 mg/kg body weight per day."( Garlic capsule and selenium-vitamins ACE combination therapy modulate key antioxidant proteins and cellular adenosine triphosphate in lisinopril-induced lung damage in rats.
Akintunde, DG; Akintunde, JK; Bolarin, OE, 2016
)
0.43
" Twice-daily lisinopril dosing was associated with greater systolic blood pressure reductions compared with the same total daily dose administered once daily."( Efficacy and safety of twice- vs once-daily dosing of lisinopril for hypertension.
Dai, IY; Kroehl, ME; Smith, SM; Thompson, AM; Trinkley, KE; Tsai, T, 2017
)
0.46
"The contemporary work describes a rapid and cost effective reversed phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography (RP-HPLC) method for the quantification of Captopril, Lisinopril and Dexibuprofen (DXP) simultaneously in dosage formulations, active pharmaceutical ingredients and human serum."( Simultaneous determination of ACE inhibitors and dexibuprofen in active pharmaceutical ingredient, formulations and human serum by RP-HPLC.
Naveed, S; Qamar, F; Sana, A; Shakeel, S, 2017
)
0.46
" Furthermore, the developed procedure was adapted for studying the content uniformity test of some dosage forms containing the cited drug."( An innovative validated spectrofluorimetric method for determination of Lisinopril in presence of hydrochlorothiazide; application to content uniformity testing.
Badr El-Din, KM; Derayea, SM; Mohammed, FF, 2018
)
0.48
" History was remarkable only for a doubling of her Lisinopril dosage 2 months prior to the appearance of her lesions, with no other potential environmental and/or drug triggers recognizable on history taking."( Lisinopril-associated bullous pemphigoid in an elderly woman: a case report of a rare adverse drug reaction.
Ballout, RA; Khattar, J; Musharrafieh, U, 2018
)
0.48
" In the absence of AH, patients received scheme I -(Mertenil® at initial dosage of 10 mg/day)."( ANICHKOV study: the effect of combined hypotensive and lipid-lowering therapy on cardiovascular complications in patients of high and very high risk.
Ansheles, AA; Boytsov, SA; Drapkina, ОМ; Gornyakova, NB; Kuharchuk, VV; Sergienko, IV; Shepel, RN; Zubareva, MY, 2019
)
0.51
" A major barrier to entry of this technology is the lack of non-destructive quality control methods capable of verifying the dosage of multiple drugs in polyprintlets at the point of dispensing."( Non-destructive dose verification of two drugs within 3D printed polyprintlets.
Basit, AW; Gaisford, S; Goyanes, A; Rowland, M; Tan, HX; Trenfield, SJ; Wilsdon, D, 2020
)
0.56
"Lisinopril and losartan manufacturer labels recommend twice-daily dosing (BID) if once-daily (QDay) is insufficient to lower blood pressure (BP)."( Twice-daily versus once-daily lisinopril and losartan for hypertension: Real-world effectiveness and safety.
Botts, SR; Delate, T; Derington, CG; Kao, DP; King, JB; Kroehl, M; Trinkley, KE, 2020
)
0.56
" Propensity scores were generated, and differences in BP and adverse events (angioedema, acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia) between BID/QDay groups were analyzed within dosing cohorts using inverse propensity of treatment-weighted regression models."( Twice-daily versus once-daily lisinopril and losartan for hypertension: Real-world effectiveness and safety.
Botts, SR; Delate, T; Derington, CG; Kao, DP; King, JB; Kroehl, M; Trinkley, KE, 2020
)
0.56
"4 with the evening dosing (р<0."( Psychological Continuum of Elderly Patients Suffering from Arterial Hypertension with Metabolic Syndrome, Against the Background of Chronotherapy with a Fixed Combination of Amlodipine, Lisinopril and Rosuvastatin.
Agarkov, NM; Kolomiets, VI; Korneeva, SI; Markelova, AM; Markelova, EA; Moskalev, AA; Moskaleva, EO; Okhotnikov, OI, 2021
)
0.62
" The applied method demonstrated the precise dosage opportunities of the inkjet printing methodology for customization and drug waste reduction."( Technical evaluation of precisely manufacturing customized microneedle array patches via inkjet drug printing.
Breitkreutz, J; Lammerding, LC, 2023
)
0.91
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (2)

RoleDescription
EC 3.4.15.1 (peptidyl-dipeptidase A) inhibitorAn EC 3.4.15.* (peptidyl-dipeptidase) inhibitor that interferes with the action of peptidyl-dipeptidase A (EC 3.4.15.1).
antihypertensive agentAny drug used in the treatment of acute or chronic vascular hypertension regardless of pharmacological mechanism.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (2)

ClassDescription
dipeptideAny molecule that contains two amino-acid residues connected by peptide linkages.
hydrateAn addition compound that contains water in weak chemical combination with another compound.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (1)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
Renin-angiotensin pathway (COVID-19 Disease Map)116

Protein Targets (21)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
DNA polymerase iota isoform a (long)Homo sapiens (human)Potency89.12510.050127.073689.1251AID588590
RAR-related orphan receptor gammaMus musculus (house mouse)Potency33.49150.006038.004119,952.5996AID1159521
USP1 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency39.81070.031637.5844354.8130AID504865
thyroid stimulating hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency7.94330.001318.074339.8107AID926
histone acetyltransferase KAT2A isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency7.94330.251215.843239.8107AID504327
lamin isoform A-delta10Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.00100.891312.067628.1838AID1487
Spike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusPotency11.22020.009610.525035.4813AID1479145
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency4.61090.000811.382244.6684AID686978
euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency10.00000.035520.977089.1251AID504332
chromobox protein homolog 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency100.00000.006026.168889.1251AID540317
VprHuman immunodeficiency virus 1Potency1.58491.584919.626463.0957AID651644
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.11007.190310.0000AID1473738
Angiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00210.00010.533610.0000AID1503699; AID1895844; AID39018; AID39616; AID39622; AID39767; AID39769; AID780572
Angiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.06400.00000.82557.5000AID1819416; AID1819417; AID271448; AID271449; AID271475
Angiotensin-converting enzymeOryctolagus cuniculus (rabbit)IC50 (µMol)0.28700.00001.612910.0000AID1168279; AID1231572; AID763534
Angiotensin-converting enzymeOryctolagus cuniculus (rabbit)Ki0.05100.00042.03378.6606AID271474
Type-2 angiotensin II receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00100.39573.3000AID39622
Angiotensin-converting enzymeRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00090.33223.0300AID39616
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, BCL-2-RELATED PROTEIN A1Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)350.00008.0570121.1218338.0000AID2765
bcl-2-like protein 11 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)350.00008.0570121.1218338.0000AID2765
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (96)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
kidney developmentAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
blood vessel remodelingAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
angiotensin maturationAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of renal output by angiotensinAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
neutrophil mediated immunityAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen via MHC class IAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of systemic arterial blood pressure by renin-angiotensinAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
proteolysisAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
spermatogenesisAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
female pregnancyAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of blood pressureAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
male gonad developmentAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
embryo development ending in birth or egg hatchingAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
post-transcriptional regulation of gene expressionAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
substance P catabolic processAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
bradykinin catabolic processAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of smooth muscle cell migrationAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of vasoconstrictionAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
animal organ regenerationAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
response to nutrient levelsAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
mononuclear cell proliferationAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
response to laminar fluid shear stressAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
angiotensin-activated signaling pathwayAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
vasoconstrictionAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
hormone metabolic processAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
hormone catabolic processAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
eating behaviorAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
peptide catabolic processAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vasoconstrictionAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glucose importAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of synaptic plasticityAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
lung alveolus developmentAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
amyloid-beta metabolic processAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid secretionAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neurogenesisAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
heart contractionAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of angiotensin metabolic processAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell differentiationAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
angiogenesis involved in coronary vascular morphogenesisAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose stimulusAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
response to dexamethasoneAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
cell proliferation in bone marrowAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of calcium ion importAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
response to thyroid hormoneAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
blood vessel diameter maintenanceAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of hematopoietic stem cell proliferationAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gap junction assemblyAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to aldosteroneAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-cysteine S-nitrosylationAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of systemic arterial blood pressureAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (40)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
carboxypeptidase activityAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
metalloendopeptidase activityAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
peptidase activityAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
metallopeptidase activityAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
exopeptidase activityAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
tripeptidyl-peptidase activityAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-dipeptidase activityAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
chloride ion bindingAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase bindingAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
bradykinin receptor bindingAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
mitogen-activated protein kinase bindingAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
metallodipeptidase activityAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
heterocyclic compound bindingAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (24)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
lysosomeAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
endosomeAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
brush border membraneAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
sperm midpieceAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAngiotensin-converting enzyme Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
virion membraneSpike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (205)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1409614Overall antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 (isolate France/IDF0372/2020) in the Vero E6 cell line at 48 h based on three assays 1) detection of viral RNA by qRT-PCR (targeting the N-gene), 2) plaque assay using lysate 3 days after addition of compound 2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID444058Volume of distribution at steady state in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID271476Selectivity for rabbit testis ACE C domain over human ACE N domain2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-01, Volume: 16, Issue:17
Synthesis of novel keto-ACE analogues as domain-selective angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors.
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID1409608AUC (viral infection %) for SARS-CoV-2 in the Vero E6 cell line at 48 h by immunofluorescence-based assay (detecting the viral NP protein in the nucleus of the Vero E6 cells).2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1676602Binding affinity to ferric ion assessed as accounting ratio by measuring total compound detected/total compound adsorbed at 2.55 umol by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography as a Drug Discovery Platform for Metalloenzyme Inhibitors.
AID271451Selectivity for ACE C domain over ACE N domain2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-01, Volume: 16, Issue:17
Synthesis and molecular modeling of a lisinopril-tryptophan analogue inhibitor of angiotensin I-converting enzyme.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1676599Binding affinity to cupric ion assessed as accounting ratio by measuring total compound detected/total compound adsorbed at 2.55 umol by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography as a Drug Discovery Platform for Metalloenzyme Inhibitors.
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID481439Absolute bioavailability in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
How well can the Caco-2/Madin-Darby canine kidney models predict effective human jejunal permeability?
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID763534Inhibition of rabbit lung ACE assessed as hydrolysis of hippuryl-histidyl-leucine to hippuric acid and histidyl-leucine after 30 mins2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-01, Volume: 21, Issue:15
Design, synthesis and evaluation of novel 2-hydroxypyrrolobenzodiazepine-5,11-dione analogues as potent angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.
AID444052Hepatic clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID592681Apparent permeability across human Caco2 cell membrane after 2 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 19, Issue:8
QSAR-based permeability model for drug-like compounds.
AID679611TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Digoxin transepithelial transport (basal to apical) (Digoxin: 0.1 uM, Lisinopril: 50 uM) in MDR1-expressing LLC-PK1 cells2002Life sciences, Feb-15, Volume: 70, Issue:13
Interaction of digoxin with antihypertensive drugs via MDR1.
AID567091Drug absorption in human assessed as human intestinal absorption rate2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 46, Issue:1
Prediction of drug intestinal absorption by new linear and non-linear QSPR.
AID699540Inhibition of human liver OATP1B3 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID681152TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake in Xenopus laevis oocytes2002Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, , Volume: 17, Issue:4
Transporter-mediated Drug Interactions.
AID1503699Inhibition of ACE (unknown origin) using Hippuryl-L-Histidyl-L-Leucine as substrate after 60 mins by colorimetric method2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 141Therapeutic investigations of novel indoxyl-based indolines: A drug target validation and Structure-Activity Relationship of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with cardiovascular regulation and thrombolytic potential.
AID1895844Inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme (unknown origin)2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 226Zinc enzymes in medicinal chemistry.
AID588209Literature-mined public compounds from Greene et al multi-species hepatotoxicity modelling dataset2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jul-19, Volume: 23, Issue:7
Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
AID481440Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
How well can the Caco-2/Madin-Darby canine kidney models predict effective human jejunal permeability?
AID1676589Binding affinity to Nickel cation assessed as performance ratio ratio by measuring product of accounting ratio and retention ratio at 2.55 umol by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography as a Drug Discovery Platform for Metalloenzyme Inhibitors.
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID444055Fraction absorbed in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID39769Inhibitory activity against Angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) from human blood serum2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-17, Volume: 46, Issue:15
Computer-aided selection of potential antihypertensive compounds with dual mechanism of action.
AID1676600Binding affinity to zinc ion assessed as accounting ratio by measuring total compound detected/total compound adsorbed at 2.55 umol by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography as a Drug Discovery Platform for Metalloenzyme Inhibitors.
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID444057Fraction escaping hepatic elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID481444Octanol-water partition coefficient, log P of the compound2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
How well can the Caco-2/Madin-Darby canine kidney models predict effective human jejunal permeability?
AID1676598Binding affinity to cupric ion assessed as retention ratio by measuring compound detected in elution fraction/total compound detected at 2.55 umol by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography as a Drug Discovery Platform for Metalloenzyme Inhibitors.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID404304Effect on human MRP2-mediated estradiol-17-beta-glucuronide transport in Sf9 cells inverted membrane vesicles relative to control2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-12, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Prediction and identification of drug interactions with the human ATP-binding cassette transporter multidrug-resistance associated protein 2 (MRP2; ABCC2).
AID39767Inhibitory activity against angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-10, Volume: 43, Issue:3
Protease inhibitors: current status and future prospects.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID699539Inhibition of human liver OATP1B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID1676592Binding affinity to Gallium ion assessed as performance ratio ratio by measuring product of accounting ratio and retention ratio at 2.55 umol by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography as a Drug Discovery Platform for Metalloenzyme Inhibitors.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1676591Binding affinity to Nickel cation assessed as accounting ratio by measuring total compound detected/total compound adsorbed at 2.55 umol by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography as a Drug Discovery Platform for Metalloenzyme Inhibitors.
AID1676588Binding affinity to Zinc ion assessed as performance ratio ratio by measuring product of accounting ratio and retention ratio at 2.55 umol by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography as a Drug Discovery Platform for Metalloenzyme Inhibitors.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID481441Aqueous diffusivity at 37C2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
How well can the Caco-2/Madin-Darby canine kidney models predict effective human jejunal permeability?
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID444053Renal clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID1409607IC50 for antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 in the Vero E6 cell line at 48 h by immunofluorescence-based assay (detecting the viral NP protein in the nucleus of the Vero E6 cells).2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID1156815Inhibition of rabbit lung ACE assessed as inhibition of hippuryl-histidyl-leucine substrate hydrolysis at 1 uM pretreated for 10 mins followed by addition of 5 mM HHL substrate for 30 mins measured as hippuric acid release2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Design and green synthesis of 2-(diarylalkyl)aminobenzothiazole derivatives and their dual activities as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers.
AID780572Inhibition of human serum ACE2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 21, Issue:22
Perindopril and ramipril phosphonate analogues as a new class of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.
AID481442Transcellular permeability at pH 6.5 calculated from in vitro P app values in Caco-2 and/or MDCK cells2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
How well can the Caco-2/Madin-Darby canine kidney models predict effective human jejunal permeability?
AID271448Inhibition of testis ACE C domain2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-01, Volume: 16, Issue:17
Synthesis and molecular modeling of a lisinopril-tryptophan analogue inhibitor of angiotensin I-converting enzyme.
AID1409609Cytotoxicity of compound against Vero E6 cells by MTT assay.2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID977602Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B3-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1676594Binding affinity to gallium ion assessed as accounting ratio by measuring total compound detected/total compound adsorbed at 2.55 umol by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography as a Drug Discovery Platform for Metalloenzyme Inhibitors.
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID38846Compound tested in vitro for inhibition of Angiotensin I converting enzyme in rat1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 32, Issue:7
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors: spirapril and related compounds.
AID481446Effective permeability across human jejunum2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
How well can the Caco-2/Madin-Darby canine kidney models predict effective human jejunal permeability?
AID271449Inhibition of somatic ACE N domain2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-01, Volume: 16, Issue:17
Synthesis and molecular modeling of a lisinopril-tryptophan analogue inhibitor of angiotensin I-converting enzyme.
AID1676590Binding affinity to Nickel cation assessed as retention ratio by measuring compound detected in elution fraction/total compound detected at 2.55 umol by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography as a Drug Discovery Platform for Metalloenzyme Inhibitors.
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID1819416Inhibition of recombinant human ACE C-domain expressed in CHO cells using Cbz-Phe-His-Leu as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition and measured after 10 mins by fluorescence spectrophotometric analysis2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-24, Volume: 65, Issue:4
Probing the Requirements for Dual Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme C-Domain Selective/Neprilysin Inhibition.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1409613Selectivity ratio: ratio of AUC (viral infection %) of SARS-CoV-2 in the Vero E6 cell line compared to AUC (cytotoxicity %) of compound against Vero E6 cells by MTT assay.2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID25867Ratio of biliary and urinary excretion of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in male rat after intravenous dosing.1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 34, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and physicochemical properties of a novel, conformationally restricted 2,3-dihydro-1,3,4-thiadiazole-containing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor which is preferentially eliminated by the biliary route in rats.
AID444054Oral bioavailability in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID445446Oral bioavailability in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 53, Issue:1
The permeation of amphoteric drugs through artificial membranes--an in combo absorption model based on paracellular and transmembrane permeability.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID977599Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B1-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID26306Logarithm of the ratio of anionic to unionized species at pH 7.41991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 34, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and physicochemical properties of a novel, conformationally restricted 2,3-dihydro-1,3,4-thiadiazole-containing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor which is preferentially eliminated by the biliary route in rats.
AID1676595Binding affinity to Ferric ion assessed as performance ratio ratio by measuring product of accounting ratio and retention ratio at 2.55 umol by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography as a Drug Discovery Platform for Metalloenzyme Inhibitors.
AID1409611AUC (cytotoxicity %) of compound against Vero E6 cells by MTT assay.2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID39616Inhibition of Angiotensin I converting enzyme1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 36, Issue:15
Excursions in drug discovery.
AID26526Compound was tested for its maximum lipophilicity.1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 34, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and physicochemical properties of a novel, conformationally restricted 2,3-dihydro-1,3,4-thiadiazole-containing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor which is preferentially eliminated by the biliary route in rats.
AID445445Permeability at pH 6.5 by PAMPA method2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 53, Issue:1
The permeation of amphoteric drugs through artificial membranes--an in combo absorption model based on paracellular and transmembrane permeability.
AID39018Inhibitory activity against angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-06, Volume: 36, Issue:16
Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship of angiotesin-converting enzyme and thermolysin inhibitors. II. A comparison of CoMFA models incorporating molecular orbital fields and desolvation free energies based on active-analog and com
AID444051Total clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID763533Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells assessed as cell survival after 24 hrs by MTT assay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-01, Volume: 21, Issue:15
Design, synthesis and evaluation of novel 2-hydroxypyrrolobenzodiazepine-5,11-dione analogues as potent angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.
AID1819417Inhibition of recombinant human ACE N-domain expressed in CHO cells using Cbz-Phe-His-Leu as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition and measured after 10 mins by fluorescence spectrophotometric analysis2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-24, Volume: 65, Issue:4
Probing the Requirements for Dual Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme C-Domain Selective/Neprilysin Inhibition.
AID763532Cytotoxicity against HEK293 cells assessed as cell survival after 24 hrs by MTT assay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-01, Volume: 21, Issue:15
Design, synthesis and evaluation of novel 2-hydroxypyrrolobenzodiazepine-5,11-dione analogues as potent angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.
AID444056Fraction escaping gut-wall elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID1676593Binding affinity to Gallium ion assessed as retention ratio by measuring compound detected in elution fraction/total compound detected at 2.55 umol by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography as a Drug Discovery Platform for Metalloenzyme Inhibitors.
AID1503700Inhibition of ACE (unknown origin) at IC50 using Hippuryl-L-Histidyl-L-Leucine as substrate after 60 mins by colorimetric method relative to control2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 141Therapeutic investigations of novel indoxyl-based indolines: A drug target validation and Structure-Activity Relationship of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with cardiovascular regulation and thrombolytic potential.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID271475Inhibition of recombinant ACE N domain2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-01, Volume: 16, Issue:17
Synthesis of novel keto-ACE analogues as domain-selective angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1607330Selectivity index, ratio of Ki for human wild type ACE N-domain to Ki for human testis ACE C-domain (unknown origin) using Abz-FRK(Dnp)P-OH as substrate by fluorescence based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Molecular Basis for Omapatrilat and Sampatrilat Binding to Neprilysin-Implications for Dual Inhibitor Design with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme.
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID1676596Binding affinity to Ferric ion assessed as retention ratio by measuring compound detected in elution fraction/total compound detected at 2.55 umol by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography as a Drug Discovery Platform for Metalloenzyme Inhibitors.
AID425653Renal clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID1819415Selectivity ratio of Ki for human ACE N-domain expressed in CHO cells to Ki for human ACE C-domain expressed in CHO cells2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-24, Volume: 65, Issue:4
Probing the Requirements for Dual Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme C-Domain Selective/Neprilysin Inhibition.
AID1168279Inhibition of rabbit lung ACE using hippuryl-histidyl-leucine as substrate assessed as release of hippuric acid incubated for 10 mins prior to substrate addition measured after 30 mins by spectrophotometry2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
Synthesis and evaluation of novel triazoles and mannich bases functionalized 1,4-dihydropyridine as angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID1676597Binding affinity to cupric ion assessed as performance ratio ratio by measuring product of accounting ratio and retention ratio at 2.55 umol by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography as a Drug Discovery Platform for Metalloenzyme Inhibitors.
AID588210Human drug-induced liver injury (DILI) modelling dataset from Ekins et al2010Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Dec, Volume: 38, Issue:12
A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.
AID699541Inhibition of human liver OATP2B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E3S uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID25873The acid dissociation constant, pKa was determined. a'' represents value of C-terminus carboxylic acid.1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 34, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and physicochemical properties of a novel, conformationally restricted 2,3-dihydro-1,3,4-thiadiazole-containing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor which is preferentially eliminated by the biliary route in rats.
AID1676601Binding affinity to Zinc ion assessed as retention ratio by measuring compound detected in elution fraction/total compound detected at 2.55 umol by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-22, Volume: 63, Issue:20
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography as a Drug Discovery Platform for Metalloenzyme Inhibitors.
AID271474Inhibition of rabbit testis recombinant ACE C domain2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-01, Volume: 16, Issue:17
Synthesis of novel keto-ACE analogues as domain-selective angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID476929Human intestinal absorption in po dosed human2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 45, Issue:3
Neural computational prediction of oral drug absorption based on CODES 2D descriptors.
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID425652Total body clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID39622Inhibition of Angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) in Bothrops jararaca venom2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-19, Volume: 45, Issue:26
2002 Alfred Burger Award Address in Medicinal Chemistry. Natural products and design: interrelated approaches in drug discovery.
AID444050Fraction unbound in human plasma2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID1231572Inhibition of rabbit lung ACE assessed as hippuryl-histidyl-leucine hydrolysis after 30 mins by colorimetric method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 23, Issue:13
Design, synthesis and evaluation of novel 2-butyl-4-chloroimidazole derived peptidomimetics as Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.
AID588519A screen for compounds that inhibit viral RNA polymerase binding and polymerization activities2011Antiviral research, Sep, Volume: 91, Issue:3
High-throughput screening identification of poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors.
AID540299A screen for compounds that inhibit the MenB enzyme of Mycobacterium tuberculosis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 20, Issue:21
Synthesis and SAR studies of 1,4-benzoxazine MenB inhibitors: novel antibacterial agents against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
AID1345457Human Angiotensin-converting enzyme (M2: Angiotensin-converting (ACE and ACE2))1997Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 51, Issue:6
Substrate dependence of angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibition: captopril displays a partial selectivity for inhibition of N-acetyl-seryl-aspartyl-lysyl-proline hydrolysis compared with that of angiotensin I.
AID1745854NCATS anti-infectives library activity on HEK293 viability as a counter-qHTS vs the C. elegans viability qHTS2023Disease models & mechanisms, 03-01, Volume: 16, Issue:3
In vivo quantitative high-throughput screening for drug discovery and comparative toxicology.
AID1745855NCATS anti-infectives library activity on the primary C. elegans qHTS viability assay2023Disease models & mechanisms, 03-01, Volume: 16, Issue:3
In vivo quantitative high-throughput screening for drug discovery and comparative toxicology.
AID1159550Human Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) Inhibitor Screening2015Nature cell biology, Nov, Volume: 17, Issue:11
6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase links oxidative PPP, lipogenesis and tumour growth by inhibiting LKB1-AMPK signalling.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID540299A screen for compounds that inhibit the MenB enzyme of Mycobacterium tuberculosis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 20, Issue:21
Synthesis and SAR studies of 1,4-benzoxazine MenB inhibitors: novel antibacterial agents against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
AID588519A screen for compounds that inhibit viral RNA polymerase binding and polymerization activities2011Antiviral research, Sep, Volume: 91, Issue:3
High-throughput screening identification of poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (2,069)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-1990145 (7.01)18.7374
1990's691 (33.40)18.2507
2000's669 (32.33)29.6817
2010's454 (21.94)24.3611
2020's110 (5.32)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 137.41

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index137.41 (24.57)
Research Supply Index2.56 (2.92)
Research Growth Index5.63 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index248.16 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (137.41)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials648 (29.32%)5.53%
Trials0 (0.00%)5.53%
Trials0 (0.00%)5.53%
Reviews124 (5.61%)6.00%
Reviews0 (0.00%)6.00%
Reviews0 (0.00%)6.00%
Case Studies285 (12.90%)4.05%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Observational9 (0.41%)0.25%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other1,144 (51.76%)84.16%
Other12 (100.00%)84.16%
Other5 (100.00%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (115)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Optimal Management of HIV Infected Adults at Risk for Kidney Complications in Nigeria [NCT03201939]Phase 2280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-02-29Suspended(stopped due to DSMB recommendations--lab QC issues relate to urine albumin measurement (>2-year pause). DSMB approval obtained (3/24/2023) to re-open but will not enroll participants until new/separate funding obtained as this award ends in Feb. 2024.)
Series of Single Patient Trials Comparing the Efficacy Between the Most Commonly Prescribed Thiazide Diuretic in the US, Hydrochlorothiazide, and Lisinopril for the Treatment of Stage 1 Hypertension. [NCT01258764]2 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Evaluation of Perioperative Biochemical Stress Factors in Craniotomy Neurosurgical Procedure With Respect to Preoperative Hypertension [NCT02441842]Phase 485 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
A Randomized Clinical Trial of the N-of-1 Approach in Children With Hypertension [NCT03461003]Phase 449 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-02Completed
Randomized, Open-label, Three Treatment Crossover Comparative Bioavailability Study of Lisinopril Tablets, 40 mg - Effect of Food Study [NCT01380431]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-08-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Maximally Tolerated RAAS Blockade and Spironolactone Therapy on Urinary Proteinuria and Progression of Type II Diabetic Nephropathy in African Americans and Other Patient Cohorts. [NCT03502031]Phase 472 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-01Recruiting
Assessment of Immediate Postoperative Delirium (IPD) in Adult Patients: Incidence, Implication of Type of Anesthesia and Identification of Other Etiological Factors [NCT03967496]402 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2019-01-01Completed
An Open-label, Single Arm, Sequential, Single Centre Trial Investigating the Influence of Oral Semaglutide (NNC0113-0217) on Pharmacokinetics of Lisinopril and Warfarin in Healthy Subjects [NCT02070510]Phase 152 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-27Completed
Modulation of Heme Oxygenase 1 by Nizatidine and Lisinopril in Healthy Subjects [NCT02232308]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Dose Titration Study to Test Efficacy and Safety of Lisinopril in Children Aged 1 to 18 Years With Primary or Secondary Hypertension. [NCT02184858]Phase 413 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-25Completed
Bioequivalence Study of Compound Lisinopril Tablets [NCT04885660]Phase 192 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-12Completed
A Non-randomized, Open-label, Single-dose, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Dose Proportionality of the Final Fixed Dose Combination Formulation of COREG CR™ and Lisinopril. [NCT00549510]Phase 129 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Multi-center, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomized, Placebo- and Active-reference, Parallel Group, Phase 2, Dose-finding Study With ACT-132577 in Subjects With Essential Hypertension (Grade 1 and 2). [NCT02603809]Phase 21,659 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-14Completed
Randomized, Open-label, Two-treatment Crossover, of a 10 mg Single Oral Dose, Study to Compare the Lisinopril Plasma Levels Produced After Administration of the Test Formulation With Those Produced After Administration of a Marketed Reference Product, Zes [NCT01375244]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-06-30Completed
Effect of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor, Lisinopril, on Renal Blood Flow and Its Correlation With Proteinuria Reduction in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes and Kidney Disease (KXK005). [NCT01101269]6 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Slow Recruitment)
A Phase 3, International, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate on CKD Progression in Participants With CKD and Hyperkalaemia or at Risk of Hyperkalaemia [NCT05056727]Phase 31,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-30Recruiting
PITT0908: Clinical Trial of Coenzyme Q10 and Lisinopril in Muscular Dystrophies [NCT01126697]Phase 2/Phase 363 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
The Chymase Angiotensin-(1-12) Axis in Hypertensive Disease [NCT05644769]Phase 410 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-15Recruiting
A Pilot, Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Blinded Endpoint (Probe) Histopathology Trial to Assess the Effects of ACE- Inhibition Therapy on Glomerular Proliferative Lesions in Patients With Extracapillary Glomerulonephritis [NCT02682459]Phase 222 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-02-29Recruiting
Comparison of Optimal Hypertension Regimens (Part of the Ancestry Informative Markers in Hypertension (AIMHY) Programme - AIMHY-INFORM) [NCT02847338]Phase 41,320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Recruiting
Lisinopril To Reduce Microalbuminuria In Postpartum Preeclamptic Women. A Role For Renal Protection? [NCT05016440]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Withdrawn
Prophylactic Lisinopril to Prevent Anthracycline Induced Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (PLAID) Study. [NCT03392740]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-15Not yet recruiting
A Randomised, Single Blind, Multicentre, 9-month, Phase IV Study, Comparing Treatment Guided by Clinical Symptoms and Signs and NT-proBNP vs Treatment Guided by Clinical Symptoms and Signs Alone, in Patients With Heart Failure (HF) and Left Ventricular Sy [NCT00391846]Phase 4252 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial Adaptive Platform Trial for Community- Acquired Pneumonia [NCT02735707]Phase 310,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-11Recruiting
Association Between Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Use and COVID-19 Severity and Mortality Among US Veterans [NCT04467931]22,213 participants (Actual)Observational2020-01-19Completed
The Precision Hypertension Care Study [NCT02774460]Phase 4280 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-20Completed
CSP #565 - Combination Angiotensin Receptor Blocker and Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor for Treatment of Diabetic Nephropathy (VA NEPHRON-D Study) [NCT00555217]Phase 31,448 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Terminated(stopped due to It was stopped primarily because of safety concerns along with low conditional power to detect a treatment effect on the primary outcome.)
A Phase 1, Fixed-Sequence, Open-label Study in Healthy Subjects to Estimate the Effects of ITCA 650 on Gastric Emptying and on the Absorption Pharmacokinetics of Each of 4 Commonly Studied Drug/Drug Interaction (DDI) Probe Compounds [NCT02641899]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
COR111096, A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study Comparing the Proportion of Subjects With Stage 1 or 2 Essential Hypertension Who Achieve Target Blood Pressure While Receiving Either Carvedilol CR + Lisinopril o [NCT00624065]Phase 3348 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Genetic Mechanisms in Human Hypertension RAAS Inhibition Study [NCT01009944]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Not funded.)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study Comparing the Effects of Carvedilol Modified Release Formulation (COREG MR) and Atenolol in Combination With and Compared to an Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (Lisinopril) on Left Ventricular Mass Re [NCT00108082]Phase 3287 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Randomized Study of Antihypertensives and Antilipemics in American Indians With Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus at High Risk of Developing Nephropathy and Cardiovascular Disease [NCT00004266]Phase 3160 participants (Actual)Interventional1993-08-31Completed
A Randomised, Placebo-controlled Pilot Trial to Examine the Efficacy of Interventions to Prevent Left Ventricular Remodelling in Patients Receiving New Pacemaker Implantation (OPT-Prevent-pilot). [NCT03422705]Phase 275 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Nebivolol Added To Antihypertensive Treatment With Lisinopril or Losartan in Patients With Hypertension. [NCT00734630]Phase 4491 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Prognostic Value of the Circadian Pattern of Ambulatory Blood Pressure for Multiple Risk Assessment [NCT00741585]Phase 421,983 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-01Completed
Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients [NCT00582114]Phase 3200 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Stopped by data safety monitoring board)
Antiproteinuric Effect of Valsartan, Lisinopril and Valsartan Plus Lisinopril in Non-diabetic and Diabetic Renal Disease: a Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel Group, Controlled Trial With 5 Months Follow-up [NCT00171574]Phase 4124 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
NT-proBNP Selected PreventiOn of Cardiac eveNts in a populaTion of dIabetic Patients Without A History of Cardiac Disease: a Prospective Randomized Trial [NCT02817360]Phase 42,400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-02-29Recruiting
Vascular Benefits of Adding CarvedilolCR to Type2 Diabetic Patients on ACEI:Effects on Oxidative Stress and Inflammation. [NCT00430040]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Terminated
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Investigate the Effects of Aleglitazar 150 µg in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Treated With Lisinopril 20 mg on Renal Function, the Renin-angiotensin System and the Pharmacokinetics of Lis [NCT01398267]Phase 155 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Randomized, 2-Way Crossover, Bioequivalence Study of Eon Labs Manufacturing Inc. (USA) and Zeneca (USA) (Zestril) 40 mg Lisinopril Tablet Administered as a 1 x 40 mg Tablet in Health Adult Males Under Fasting Conditions. [NCT00883064]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-03-31Completed
Effect of ACE-inhibitors on Aortic Stiffness in Elderly Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease [NCT00874432]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Blood Pressure and Metabolic Effects of Nebivolol Compared With Hydrochlorothiazide and Placebo in Hypertensive Patients With Impaired Glucose Tolerance or Impaired Fasting Glucose [NCT00673790]Phase 4537 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-15Completed
Aliskiren and Renin Inhibition in Diastolic Heart Failure in Mexican Americans [NCT00773084]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Difficulty in recruiting patients and then the PI left the institution)
Women With Chest Pain and Normal Coronary Arteries Study: A Randomized Study of Medical Treatment and Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes [NCT00743197]3 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to departure of PI from institution.)
Renal Denervation in Patients After Acute Coronary Syndrome [NCT01901549]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-06-30Recruiting
Bioequivalence Study of 10 mg Lisinopril Tablets (Lisinopril 10 mg) Produced by PT Dexa Medica in Comparison With The Innovator Tablets (Zestril® 10 mg, PT Boehringer Ingelheim Indonesia, Indonesia, Under License From Astra Zeneca UK Ltd.) [NCT01936012]34 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Randomized, 3-Way Crossover, Bioequivalence Study of Eon Labs Manufacturing Inc. (USA) and Zeneca (USA) (Zestril) 40 mg Lisinopril Tablet Administered as a 1 x 40 mg Tablet in Health Adult Males Under Fasting Conditions Under Fasting and Fed Conditions. [NCT00883506]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-05-31Completed
Comparative, Open Multicenter Trial Assessing the Effect on Albumin Excretion Rate of 320mg Valsartan (With or Without HCTZ) vs 40mg Lisinopril (With or Without HCTZ) on Hypertensive Patients With Diabetic and Non-diabetic Nephropathy and Albuminuria [NCT00171600]Phase 454 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Terminated
A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Effects of First-Line Treatment With a Free Combination of Nebivolol and Lisinopril Compared With Placebo and the Monotherapy Components on Blood Pressure in Patients With Stage 2 Diastolic [NCT01218100]Phase 4664 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
The Vascular Effects of Carvedilol Controlle Release (CR) + Lisinopril Versus Lisinopril + Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in Abdominally Obese Hypertensive Patients [NCT00459056]Phase 325 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Comparative Blood Pressure Effects of Nebivolol Versus Lisinopril in Patients With New Onset or Exacerbated Hypertension Induced by Bevacizumab: a Crossover Study [NCT01076140]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to No participants enrolled)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel Group, Factorial Design Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of up to Six Weeks Treatment With 20mg, 40mg, or 80mg QD Doses of Carvedilol Controlled Release Formulation (COREG CR) or 10mg, 20mg, or 40m [NCT00347360]Phase 3654 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Single-dose, Crossover Study to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of the Final Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) Formulation (COREG CR & Lisinopril) to COREG CR & ZESTRIL Employed in the Phase III Factorial Study [NCT00552708]Phase 155 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Paramedic Initiated Lisinopril For Acute Stroke Treatment: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT01066572]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
HALT Progression of Polycystic Kidney Disease Study A [NCT00283686]Phase 3558 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
The Usefulness of Non-invasive Assessment of Haemodynamic Profile in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertension [NCT01996085]144 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Pharmacological Association of the Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism on Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Risk in Relation to Anti-hypertensive Treatment [NCT00006294]37,939 participants (Actual)Observational1999-09-30Completed
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Effect of LY2189265 on Lisinopril in Subjects With Hypertension and Metoprolol in Healthy Subjects [NCT01324388]Phase 151 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Role of Lisinopril in Preventing the Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD): Relief-NAFLD [NCT04550481]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-01Recruiting
Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) [NCT00000620]Phase 310,251 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-09-30Completed
The Use of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitors to Assess Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Resistant Hypertension [NCT02623036]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-11-30Recruiting
Lack of Effect of Antihypertensive Treatment With Amlodipine and Lisinopril on Retinal Autoregulation in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes and Mild Diabetic Retinopathy. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. [NCT00337298]25 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy of Carvedilol Phosphate Modified Release Formulation (COREG MR) and Metoprolol Succinate Extended Release (TOPROL-XL) on the Reduction of Microalbuminuria in Patient [NCT00123903]Phase 31,220 participants Interventional2005-07-31Terminated
Optimal Dose of ACE Inhibitor for Treatment of Diabetic Nephropathy in Type 1 Diabetic Patients With Hypertension and Diabetic Nephropathy [NCT00118976]60 participants Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Study to Evaluate the Potential Incidence of Orthostatic Hypotension in Elderly Hypertensive Patients Following Administration of a Combination of COREG CR and Lisinopril [NCT00508365]Phase 162 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-25Completed
A Two-way Cross-over, Placebo-controlled Interaction Trial in Two Parts (in Healthy Subjects), Studying Liraglutide's Potential Influence on the Absorption Pharmacokinetics of Lisinopril, Atorvastatin, Griseofulvin and Digoxin, and Liraglutide's Potential [NCT01518166]Phase 170 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Compare Efficacy of the Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEi) Lisinopril With Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist Losartan (ARB) for the Cardiomyopathy of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy [NCT01982695]23 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Cognitive and Cerebrovascular Sequelae of Hypertension [NCT00151138]50 participants Interventional2002-09-30Completed
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Valsartan 320 mg in Combination With Lisinopril 20 mg Versus Monotherapy With Lisinopril 40 mg or Valsartan 320 mg in Hypertensive Patients With Microalbuminuria on the Reduction of Urinary Albumin Creatinine Ratio [NCT00171067]Phase 3134 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
Clinical Bioequivalence Study on Two Lisinopril Tablets 20mg Formulations [NCT03599466]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-31Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of Coreg CR and Lisinopril on Markers for Cardiovascular Functional and Structural Disease. DETECT (DEtection and Treatment of Early Cardiovascular Disease Trial) [NCT00553969]Phase 1/Phase 2101 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Novel Therapies for Resistant Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis [NCT00814255]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Open Label, Balanced, Two-Treatment, Two-Period, Two-Sequence, Single Dose, Crossover, Comparative Bioavailability Study of Lisinopril and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets (20+25) mg of M/s Ipca Laboratories Ltd., India With Zestoretic® 20/25 Lis [NCT01831700]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
Chronic Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Intermediate Risk Surgery: A Randomized, Single-Blinded Study [NCT01669434]Phase 4291 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-01Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, Active-Controlled Study To Evaluate The Effectiveness Of Morning Versus Evening Doses Of 320 Mg Valsartan Versus 40 Mg Lisinopril On The 24 Hour Blood Pressure Profile In Patients With Hypertension [NCT00241124]Phase 41,099 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Renal Protective Effect of ACEI and ARB in Primary Hyperoxaluria [NCT00280215]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Inadequate number of patients, lack of funding)
Black Education and Treatment of Hypertension (BEAT HTN) [NCT00661895]Phase 499 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Prognostic Value of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Events and Effects of Chronotherapy in Relation to Risk (the MAPEC Study). [NCT00295542]Phase 43,344 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-03-31Completed
HALT Progression of Polycystic Kidney Disease Study B [NCT01885559]Phase 3486 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
[NCT00311870]Phase 452 participants Interventional1993-03-31Completed
A Randomised Controlled Cross-over Trial to Evaluate Evening Versus Morning Administration of a Cardiovascular Polypill [NCT01506505]78 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Balanced, Open Label, Two Treatment, Two Period, Two Sequence, Single Dose, Crossover, Bioequivalence Study of Lisinopril Tablets 40 mg With Zestril® (Lisinopril) 40 mg Tablets in Normal, Healthy, Adult, Male and Female Human Subjects Under [NCT01735318]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Balanced, Open Label, Two Treatment, Two Period, Two Sequence, Single Dose, Crossover, Bioequivalence Study of Lisinopril Tablets 40 mg With Zestril® (Lisinopril) 40 mg Tablets in Normal, Healthy, Adult, Male and Female Human Subjects Under [NCT01735344]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Multicentre Prospective Open Label Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of Personalized Therapy on Patients With Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy. [NCT04662723]Phase 4878 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-01Recruiting
A Randomized, Open Label, Balanced, Two-Treatment, Two-Period, Two-Sequence, Single Dose, Crossover, Comparative Bioavailability Study of Lisinopril and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets (20+25) mg of M/s Ipca Laboratories Ltd., India With Zestoretic® 20/25 Lis [NCT01827878]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Phase II Study of the Effect of ACE Inhibitors on Pro-Angiogenic Hormones in Cancer Patients With Hypertension [NCT01234922]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Terminated(stopped due to slow accrual)
Is There a Benefit to Optimize HF (Heart Failure) Treatment in Aged Over 80 Year's Old Patients? [NCT01437371]Phase 335 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction for Persons With HIV Infection: a Polypill Pilot Study [NCT00982189]37 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Effect of Polipill on Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk : a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01313702]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Withdrawn
The CORONAvirus Disease 2019 Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor/Angiotensin Receptor Blocker InvestigatiON (CORONACION) Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04330300]Phase 42,414 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-30Suspended(stopped due to Challenges with funding and very low incidence of COVID-19 at Irish study site)
AuTophagy Activation for Cardiomyopathy Due to Anthracycline tReatment (ATACAR) Trial [NCT04190433]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Administratively closed due to low/no accrual)
A Randomized, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Effects on Blood Pressure Control, Pulse Wave Velocity, as Well as Safety and Tolerability of Felodipine Sustained Release, Alone and in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide, in Chin [NCT02336607]529 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Effects of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors on Peritoneal Protein Loss and Solute Transport in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients [NCT01575652]Phase 443 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Randomized Crossover 2 Period Single Dose Bioequivalence Study of 2 Formulations Lisinopril Tab. 20mg (Pharmtechnology LLC,Belarus) and Zestril® Tab. 20mg (Avara Reims Pharmaceutical Services, France) in Healthy Volunteers Under Fasting Conditions [NCT05061901]Phase 138 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-06Completed
[NCT00000542]Phase 30 participants Interventional1993-08-31Completed
CAndesartan vs LIsinopril Effects on the BRain and Endothelial Function in eXecutive MCI (CALIBREX) [NCT01984164]Phase 2176 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-20Completed
Optimization of Pre-surgical Testing With an Intensive Multifactorial Intervention to MinimiZe Cardiovascular Events in Orthopedic Surgery [NCT01837069]Phase 4198 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Low recruitment / DSMB approval to halt recruitment)
A Novel Phase 2 Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Centrally Acting, Non-toxic ACE Inhibition in Cognitive Impairment Associated With SLE [NCT04486118]Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-01Recruiting
A Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of Low Dose Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Prevent Pneumonia in Older People Who Require Tube Feeding Because of Neurological Dysphagia [NCT02358642]Phase 493 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Terminated(stopped due to The interim analysis suggested that low dose lisinopril given to be tube fed older patients with neuroligical dysphagia had increased mortality.)
Effect of Renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) Blocker Drugs on Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Progression in Elderly Patients With Non Proteinuric Nephropathies (PROERCAN01) [NCT03195023]Phase 4106 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-06-30Recruiting
A Phase I Study to Determine the Preferred Dose of the Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Lisinopril for Preventing Urinary Toxicity Following Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer [NCT05530655]Early Phase 170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Lisinopril in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients [NCT01491919]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Reducing Total Cardiovascular Risk in an Urban Community [NCT00241904]Phase 4525 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Plasma Renin Activity Guided vs Generic Combination Therapy for Hypertension [NCT01658657]17 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Double-Blind Pilot Study to Measure the Effect of Lisinopril vs. Placebo on Pulmonary Distress in Patients Receiving External Beam Radiotherapy to the Lung [NCT01880528]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System and Parathyroid Hormone Control: The RAAS-PARC Study [NCT01691781]41 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
ACE Inhibitors to Decrease Lymphoid Fibrosis in Antiretroviral-Treated, HIV-infected Patients: A Pilot Study [NCT01535235]Phase 431 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Advanced Chronic Heart Failure [NCT00292162]41 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Phase II Placebo-controlled Trial of Lisinopril and Coreg CR® to Reduce Cardiotoxicity in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Trastuzumab (Herceptin®) [NCT01009918]Phase 2468 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
The Antihypertensives and Vascular, Endothelial and Cognitive Function Trial (AVEC Trial) [NCT00605072]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Single-dose, 3-period Crossover Study to Assess the Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of the Final Fixed Dose Combination Formulation of COREG CR and Lisinopril in the Fed and Fasted State. [NCT00557128]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A 5-year Prospective, Placebo-controlled, Crossover Evaluation of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Low-dose Lisinopril in Normotensives With Idiopathic Oligospermic Infertility [NCT01409837]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-03-31Completed
Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD [NCT03417388]Phase 44,422 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-09Recruiting
Series of N-of-1 Crossover Trials of Antihypertensive Therapy in Adolescents With Essential Hypertension [NCT02412761]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]Death From Any Cause in the Glycemia Trial.
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]Stroke in the Blood Pressure Trial.
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]First Occurrence of MCE or Revascularization or Hospitalization for Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) in Lipid Trial.
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]First Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE) in the Lipid Trial.
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]First Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE) in the Blood Pressure Trial.
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]First Occurrence of a Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE); Specifically Nonfatal Heart Attack, Nonfatal Stroke, or Cardiovascular Death (Measured Throughout the Study) in the Glycemia Trial.
NCT00108082 (14) [back to overview]Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed by Height (LVMIH) as Measured by Echocardiography at Month 12
NCT00108082 (14) [back to overview]Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular (LV) Mass as Measured by MRI at Month 12
NCT00108082 (14) [back to overview]Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed (LVMI) by Body Surface Area as Measured by Echocardiography at Month 12
NCT00108082 (14) [back to overview]Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed (LVMI) by Body Surface Area as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Month 12
NCT00108082 (14) [back to overview]Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed by Height (LVMIH) as Measured by MRI at Month 12
NCT00108082 (14) [back to overview]Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in LV Mass as Measured by Echocardiography at Month 12
NCT00108082 (14) [back to overview]Model-adjusted Ratio to Baseline as Percentage Change From Baseline in Log Transformed Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) at Month 12
NCT00108082 (14) [back to overview]Model-adjusted Ratio to Baseline as Percentage Change From Baseline in Log Transformed B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) at Month 12
NCT00108082 (14) [back to overview]Model-adjusted Ratio to Baseline as Percentage Change From Baseline in Log Transformed C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 12
NCT00108082 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in LV Filling Parameters as Measured by MRI at Month 12
NCT00108082 (14) [back to overview]Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in LV End Systolic and Diastolic Volumes and Ejection Fraction as Measured by Echocardiography at Month 12
NCT00108082 (14) [back to overview]Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in LV End Systolic and Diastolic Volumes and Ejection Fraction as Measured by MRI at Month 12
NCT00108082 (14) [back to overview]Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 12
NCT00108082 (14) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Log Transformed Lipid Parameters at Month 12
NCT00241904 (4) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT00241904 (4) [back to overview]Patients' Satisfaction With Care and Health Care Utilization
NCT00241904 (4) [back to overview]Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00241904 (4) [back to overview]HbA1c
NCT00283686 (9) [back to overview]All-Cause Hospitalizations
NCT00283686 (9) [back to overview]Kidney Function (eGFR)
NCT00283686 (9) [back to overview]Left Ventricular Mass Index
NCT00283686 (9) [back to overview]Quality of Life Physical Component Summary
NCT00283686 (9) [back to overview]Renal Blood Flow
NCT00283686 (9) [back to overview]Study A: Percent Annual Change in Total Kidney Volume
NCT00283686 (9) [back to overview]Aldosterone
NCT00283686 (9) [back to overview]Albuminuria
NCT00283686 (9) [back to overview]Quality of Life Mental Component Summary
NCT00292162 (6) [back to overview]Plasma B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) at Baseline
NCT00292162 (6) [back to overview]Plasma B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) at 6 Months
NCT00292162 (6) [back to overview]Plasma B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)
NCT00292162 (6) [back to overview]Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)%
NCT00292162 (6) [back to overview]Baseline Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
NCT00292162 (6) [back to overview]Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)at 6 Months
NCT00347360 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 6 in 24 Hour (hr) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT00347360 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 6 in 24 Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT00347360 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Trough Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT00347360 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Trough Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT00347360 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Trough to Peak Ratios of DBP by 24 Hour ABPM (Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring)
NCT00347360 (11) [back to overview]Diastolic Responders, Defined as ≥ 10 mmHg Sitting (s)DBP Reduction From Baseline or a sDBP of <90 / 80 Millimeters (mm) of Mercury (Hg) for Non Diabetic / Diabetic Subjects Respectively (Based on Cuff Trough Measures)
NCT00347360 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Mean SBP and DBP Measured at Night by 24hr ABPM
NCT00347360 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Mean Trough Sitting SBP and Sitting DBP by Cuff Assessment
NCT00347360 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Mean SBP and DBP Measured in Morning by 24 Hour ABPM
NCT00347360 (11) [back to overview]Dose-response Treatment Estimates: Change From Baseline to Week 6 in 24 Hour Mean DBP by ABPM (Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring)
NCT00347360 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Mean SBP and DBP Measured in Afternoon by 24hr ABPM
NCT00391846 (8) [back to overview]Changes in Health-related Quality of Life
NCT00391846 (8) [back to overview]Changes in Heart Failure Symptoms
NCT00391846 (8) [back to overview]Changes in NT-proBNP Values Over Time in All Patients
NCT00391846 (8) [back to overview]Composite Value of 3 Variables After 9 Months: Cardiovascular Death (Days Alive), Cardiovascular Hospitalization (Days Out of Hospital), Heart Failure Symptoms (Symptom Score Subset of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire - Questions 3,5,7,9)
NCT00391846 (8) [back to overview]Discontinuations
NCT00391846 (8) [back to overview]Number of CV Deaths
NCT00391846 (8) [back to overview]Number of Days in Hospital for CV Reason
NCT00391846 (8) [back to overview]Total Number of Titration Steps in Prescribed Heart Failure Treatment
NCT00459056 (1) [back to overview]Change in Reactive Hyperemic Index by Period (Carvedilol CR + Lisinopril vs. Lisinopril + HCTZ)
NCT00553969 (1) [back to overview]Change in Disease Score (DS) Among the Treatment Groups
NCT00555217 (2) [back to overview]A Renal Composite Endpoint, Defined as; Reduction in Estimated GFR of >50% (for Individuals With Baseline GFR <60) or Reduction in GFR of >30 (for Individuals With Baseline GFR >= GFR 60) or ESRD.
NCT00555217 (2) [back to overview]A Composite Endpoint of Reduction in Estimated GFR of 30ml/Min/1.73m*m in Individuals w/a Baseline Estimated GFR >= 60 ml/Min/1.73m*m, Reduction in Estimated GFR >50% in Individuals w/ Baseline Estimated GFR <60ml/Min/1.73m*m; ESRD or Death
NCT00582114 (2) [back to overview]Serious Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Events That Led to Trial Termination
NCT00582114 (2) [back to overview]The Primary End Point is the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) by Echocardiographic Criteria From Baseline to 1 Year.
NCT00605072 (5) [back to overview]Cognitive Assessment: Trail Making Test Part B
NCT00605072 (5) [back to overview]Blood Flow Velocity, Sitting
NCT00605072 (5) [back to overview]Blood Pressure Outcome: Systolic BP
NCT00605072 (5) [back to overview]Cognitive Assessment: Forward Digit Span Test
NCT00605072 (5) [back to overview]Cognitive Assessment: Hopkins Verbal Learning- Immediate Recall
NCT00624065 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (sSBP) and Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (sDBP) at Week 6
NCT00624065 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Mean Sitting Cuff Blood Pressure <140/90 mmHg at the End of 6 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00661895 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving Blood Pressure Goals
NCT00673790 (2) [back to overview]Plasma Glucose Level After an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
NCT00673790 (2) [back to overview]Trough Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT00734630 (2) [back to overview]Mean Seated Trough Cuff Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 12
NCT00734630 (2) [back to overview]Mean Seated Trough Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 12
NCT00814255 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Reduction in Proteinuria at 6 Months by > 50% of the Value at Screening AND Stable GFR Defined as Greater Than 75 ml/Min/1.73m2 in Those With an Initial Value Above 90 OR Within 25% of Baseline for Remaining Patients
NCT00814255 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00874432 (2) [back to overview]Mean Vascular Stiffness As Measured by PWV
NCT00874432 (2) [back to overview]Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV)
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Changes in Blood Pressure
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Changes in Small Artery Elasticity
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Changes IL-6 (Interleukin-6)
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Changes hsCRP (C-reactive Protein)
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Stated (by Self-report) That They Had Side Effects
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Month 4 in the Framingham Risk Score (FRS)
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Changes in Blood Lipids
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Took >90% of Their Doses (by Pill Count)
NCT00982189 (9) [back to overview]Changes TNFa (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha)
NCT01009918 (5) [back to overview]Quality-of-life Changes Between Baseline and 52-weeks
NCT01009918 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Cardiotoxicity-free Survival at 750 Days From Baseline
NCT01009918 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With LVEF Decrease to <50%
NCT01009918 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Trastuzumab-Induced Cardiotoxicity After 52 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01009918 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Trastuzumab Course Interruption
NCT01218100 (2) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in Trough Seated Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 6.
NCT01218100 (2) [back to overview]The Change From Baseline in Trough Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 6.
NCT01234922 (1) [back to overview]Changes in Ang1-7 Levels Among Patients After ACE-I/ARB Treatment Measured in Picogram/Milliliter
NCT01324388 (8) [back to overview]Mean, 24-hour Blood Pressure (Collected by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring [ABPM]) in Response to Co-administration of LY2189265 and Lisinopril
NCT01324388 (8) [back to overview]Mean, 24-hour Blood Pressure (Collected by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring [ABPM]) in Response to Co-administration of LY2189265 and Metoprolol
NCT01324388 (8) [back to overview]Mean, 24-hour Heart Rate (Collected by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring [ABPM]) in Response to Co-administration of LY2189265 and Lisinopril
NCT01324388 (8) [back to overview]Mean, 24-hour Heart Rate (Collected by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring [ABPM]) in Response to Co-administration of LY2189265 and Metoprolol
NCT01324388 (8) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics, Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) of Metoprolol When Administered With LY2189265
NCT01324388 (8) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics, Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Lisinopril
NCT01324388 (8) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics, Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Metoprolol When Administered With LY2189265
NCT01324388 (8) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics, Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) of Lisinopril
NCT01409837 (9) [back to overview]Adverse Events Monitoring
NCT01409837 (9) [back to overview]Changes From Baseline in the Seminal Fluid Characteristics Throughout the Study
NCT01409837 (9) [back to overview]Ejaculate Volume
NCT01409837 (9) [back to overview]Proportion of Sperm Cells With Abnormal Morphology (%)
NCT01409837 (9) [back to overview]Proportion of Sperm Cells With Abnormal Morphology (%)
NCT01409837 (9) [back to overview]Proportion of Sperm Cells With Normal Motility (%)
NCT01409837 (9) [back to overview]Proportion of Sperm Cells With Normal Motility (%)
NCT01409837 (9) [back to overview]Total Sperm Cell Count
NCT01409837 (9) [back to overview]Total Sperm Cell Count Per Milliliter of Seminal Fluid.
NCT01491919 (14) [back to overview]PK - Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug in Plasma (Cmax)
NCT01491919 (14) [back to overview]PK - Oral Clearance (CL/F)
NCT01491919 (14) [back to overview]PK - Time of the Maximum Observed Concentration in Plasma (Tmax)
NCT01491919 (14) [back to overview]PK Renal Clearance (CLrenal)
NCT01491919 (14) [back to overview]Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline in Lisinopril SOC Group
NCT01491919 (14) [back to overview]Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline in Lisinopril-naive Participants
NCT01491919 (14) [back to overview]Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (BP) From Baseline in Lisinopril SOC Group
NCT01491919 (14) [back to overview]Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline in Lisinopril-naive Participants
NCT01491919 (14) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During/After Study Drug Administration
NCT01491919 (14) [back to overview]Worse Post-dose Decrease in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Baseline in Lisinopril-naive Participants
NCT01491919 (14) [back to overview]Change in Potassium Level From Baseline in Lisinopril-naive Participants
NCT01491919 (14) [back to overview]Change in Urine Protein/Creatinine From Baseline in Lisinopril-naive Participants.
NCT01491919 (14) [back to overview]Largest eGFR Percent Decrease From Baseline in Lisinopril-naive Participants
NCT01491919 (14) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK) - Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC)
NCT01535235 (2) [back to overview]Change in HIV DNA (Copies/Million Rectal Cells)
NCT01535235 (2) [back to overview]Change in HIV RNA (Copies/Million Rectal Cells)
NCT01658657 (1) [back to overview]Blood Pressure Control, as Defined as Office BP Measurement of <140 mmHg Systolic and <90 mmHg Diastolic
NCT01669434 (6) [back to overview]Postoperative Hypotension
NCT01669434 (6) [back to overview]Low Blood Pressure Subgroup
NCT01669434 (6) [back to overview]Acute Renal Failure
NCT01669434 (6) [back to overview]Postoperative Hypertension
NCT01669434 (6) [back to overview]Older Age Subgroup
NCT01669434 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Interoperative Hypotension
NCT01691781 (3) [back to overview]Urinary Aldosterone Excretion Measurements Following 1 Week of ACE Inhibitor Therapy
NCT01691781 (3) [back to overview]Serum Calcium Following 1 Week of ACE Inhibitor Administration
NCT01691781 (3) [back to overview]Parathyroid Hormone Following 1 Week of ACE Inhibitor Administration
NCT01837069 (2) [back to overview]Length of Stay
NCT01837069 (2) [back to overview]Number of Partipants That Experienced Death, Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack, Myocardial Necrosis, or Venous Thromboembolism
NCT01880528 (5) [back to overview]Acute Respiratory Distress (Dyspnea), Measured Using of the Maximum Score, at Any Time, of the Shortness of Breath Question (Item #4) on the LCSS (Worst Dyspnea Score)
NCT01880528 (5) [back to overview]Experience Shortness of Breath During Exercise as Measured Using Item #3 on the Symptom Experience Questionnaire (SEQ) at Week 4
NCT01880528 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Hypotension, Acute Kidney Injury, Allergic Reaction, or Anaphylaxis, as Measured Using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.0
NCT01880528 (5) [back to overview]Quality of Life (Dyspnea When Climbing Stairs) Assessed Using Item #5 of the European Organization for Research on the Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Module Survey (EORTC-QLQ-LC13) at Week 4
NCT01880528 (5) [back to overview]Total LCSS Score as Measure by the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) at Week 4
NCT01885559 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With 50% Reduction of Baseline eGFR, End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD, Initiation of Dialysis or Preemptive Transplant), or Death.
NCT01885559 (8) [back to overview]Quality of Life Mental Component Summary
NCT01885559 (8) [back to overview]Quality of Life Physical Component Summary
NCT01885559 (8) [back to overview]Albuminuria
NCT01885559 (8) [back to overview]Aldosterone
NCT01885559 (8) [back to overview]Back or Flank Pain
NCT01885559 (8) [back to overview]Cardiovascular Hospitalizations
NCT01885559 (8) [back to overview]Hospitalizations
NCT01982695 (1) [back to overview]Cardiac Ejection Fraction as Measured by Echocardiogram
NCT01984164 (8) [back to overview]Executive Function
NCT01984164 (8) [back to overview]Language
NCT01984164 (8) [back to overview]Memory
NCT01984164 (8) [back to overview]White Matter Lesion Volume
NCT01984164 (8) [back to overview]Cerebral Perfusion
NCT01984164 (8) [back to overview]"NINDS-initiated EXecutive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research or EXAMINER Tool Box."
NCT01984164 (8) [back to overview]Attention Measured Using Digit Span Backward
NCT01984164 (8) [back to overview]Attention Measured Using Digit Span Forward
NCT02336607 (12) [back to overview]The Magnitude of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Changes From Baseline Among the Subjects Who Reached Target at 2 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release, Alone
NCT02336607 (12) [back to overview]The Magnitude of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Changes From Baseline Among the Subjects Who Reached Target at 12 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.
NCT02336607 (12) [back to overview]The Magnitude of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Changes From Baseline Among the Subjects Who Reached Target After 8 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.
NCT02336607 (12) [back to overview]The Magnitude of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Changes From Baseline Among All Randomized Subjects After 8 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.
NCT02336607 (12) [back to overview]The Magnitude of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Changes From Baseline Among All Randomized Subjects After 12 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.
NCT02336607 (12) [back to overview]The Magnitude of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Change From Baseline Among All Randomized Subjects After 4 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.
NCT02336607 (12) [back to overview]The Change of Pulse Wave Velocity From Baseline at 2, 14 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release Alone.
NCT02336607 (12) [back to overview]The Percentage of Subjects Reaching Blood Pressure Target (Defined as < 140 / 90 mmHg) After 8 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.
NCT02336607 (12) [back to overview]The Percentage of Subjects Reaching Blood Pressure Target (Defined as < 140 / 90 mmHg) After 4 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.
NCT02336607 (12) [back to overview]The Percentage of Subjects Reaching Blood Pressure Target (Defined as < 140 / 90 mmHg) After 14 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.
NCT02336607 (12) [back to overview]The Change of Pulse Wave Velocity at 12 Weeks Compare With Baseline Data of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.
NCT02336607 (12) [back to overview]The Magnitude of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Changes From Baseline Among the Subjects Who Reached Target at 4 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.
NCT02412761 (1) [back to overview]The Number of Patients for Whom Each Drug is Selected as the Preferred Therapy
NCT02603809 (8) [back to overview]Response Rates at End of Double-blind Treatment Period Based on Trough Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT02603809 (8) [back to overview]Ratio of Group Mean at Trough to Group Mean at Peak for Diastolic Blood Pressure Based on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM)
NCT02603809 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to End of Double-blind Treatment in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Trough
NCT02603809 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to End of Double-blind Treatment in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Trough
NCT02603809 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to End of Double-blind Treatment in 24-hour Diastolic and Systolic Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM)
NCT02603809 (8) [back to overview]Response Rates at End of Double-blind Treatment Period Based on Trough Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT02603809 (8) [back to overview]Control Rates at the End of the Double-blind Treatment Period Based on Trough Sitting Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT02603809 (8) [back to overview]Supportive Analysis of Primary Endpoint: Change From Baseline to End of Double-blind Treatment in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Trough
NCT03461003 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Self-reported Adherence to Intervention
NCT03461003 (5) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction With Intervention as Assessed by a Survey
NCT03461003 (5) [back to overview]Change in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT03461003 (5) [back to overview]Change in Mean Wake Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT03461003 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Reported That Side Effects From Medication Led Them to Discontinue Medication

Death From Any Cause in the Glycemia Trial.

"Time to death from any cause. Secondary measure for Glycemia Trial.~A finding of higher mortality in the intensive-therapy group led to an early discontinuation of therapy after a mean of 3.5 years of follow-up. Intensive arm participants were transitioned to standard arm strategy over a period of 0.2 year and followed for an additional 1.2 years to the planned end of the Glycemia Trial while participating in one of the other sub-trials (BP or Lipid)." (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.9 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Glycemia Trial: Intensive Control391
Glycemia Trial: Standard Control327

[back to top]

Stroke in the Blood Pressure Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal or fatal stroke among participants in the BP Trial. (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.7 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
BP Trial: Intensive Control36
BP Trial: Standard Control62

[back to top]

First Occurrence of MCE or Revascularization or Hospitalization for Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) in Lipid Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, cardiovascular death, revascularization procedure or hospitalization for CHF in Lipid Trial participants. (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.7 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lipid Trial: Fenofibrate641
Lipid Trial: Placebo667

[back to top]

First Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE) in the Lipid Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death in Lipid Trial participants. (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.7 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lipid Trial: Fenofibrate291
Lipid Trial: Placebo310

[back to top]

First Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE) in the Blood Pressure Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. Primary outcome for Blood Pressure Trial. (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.7 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
BP Trial: Intensive Control208
BP Trial: Standard Control237

[back to top]

First Occurrence of a Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE); Specifically Nonfatal Heart Attack, Nonfatal Stroke, or Cardiovascular Death (Measured Throughout the Study) in the Glycemia Trial.

"Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. This was the primary outcome measure in all three trials: Glycemia (all participants), Blood Pressure (subgroup of participants not in Lipid Trial), and Lipid (subgroup of participants not in Blood Pressure Trial).~In the Glycemia Trial, a finding of higher mortality in the intensive arm group led to an early discontinuation of therapy after a mean of 3.5 years of follow-up. Intensive arm participants were transitioned to standard arm strategy over a period of 0.2 year and followed for an additional 1.2 years to the planned end of the Glycemia Trial while participating in one of the other sub-trials (BP or Lipid) to their planned completion." (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.9 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Glycemia Trial: Intensive Control503
Glycemia Trial: Standard Control543

[back to top]

Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed by Height (LVMIH) as Measured by Echocardiography at Month 12

LVMIH was measured by echogradiography at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. (NCT00108082)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was available)

Interventiong/m raised to 2.7 (g/(m^2.7)) (Mean)
Carvedilol CR-11.78
Atenolol-12.51
Lisinopril-11.61

[back to top]

Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular (LV) Mass as Measured by MRI at Month 12

LV Mass was measured by MRI at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. (NCT00108082)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

Interventiongrams (g) (Mean)
Carvedilol CR-13.74
Atenolol-14.17
Lisinopril-17.17

[back to top]

Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed (LVMI) by Body Surface Area as Measured by Echocardiography at Month 12

LVMI was measured by echogradiography at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. (NCT00108082)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

Interventiongrams per meters squared (g/m^2) (Mean)
Carvedilol CR-20.35
Atenolol-20.06
Lisinopril-18.48

[back to top]

Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed (LVMI) by Body Surface Area as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Month 12

LVMI was measured by MRI at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. A reduction in left ventricular mass, calculated as LVMI, of 5 g/m^2 was assumed to be clinically meaningful. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. (NCT00108082)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF] analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

Interventiongrams per meters squared (g/m^2) (Mean)
Carvedilol CR-6.34
Atenolol-6.67
Lisinopril-7.94

[back to top]

Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed by Height (LVMIH) as Measured by MRI at Month 12

LVMIH was measured by MRI at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. LV mass depends on body size. One method of determining whether an individual has LV hypertrophy relates LV mass to height raised to a power of 2.7. (NCT00108082)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

Interventiong/m raised to 2.7 (g/(m^2.7)) (Mean)
Carvedilol CR-3.19
Atenolol-3.37
Lisinopril-3.98

[back to top]

Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in LV Mass as Measured by Echocardiography at Month 12

LV Mass was measured by echocardiography at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. (NCT00108082)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

Interventiongrams (Mean)
Carvedilol CR-45.76
Atenolol-40.56
Lisinopril-38.58

[back to top]

Model-adjusted Ratio to Baseline as Percentage Change From Baseline in Log Transformed Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) at Month 12

Urinary ACR (micrograms per milligram) was determined at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Percentage change from Baseline was based on log transformed data and was calculated as 100 x (exponent (exponent (mean change on log scale) - 1. [Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.] (NCT00108082)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF was used)

Interventionpercentage of change (Geometric Mean)
Carvedilol CR-27.1
Atenolol-20.1
Lisinopril-21.5

[back to top]

Model-adjusted Ratio to Baseline as Percentage Change From Baseline in Log Transformed B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) at Month 12

BNP concentration (picagram per milliter) was measured at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Percentage change from Baseline was based on log transformed data and was calculated as 100 x (exponent (mean change on log scale) -1) [Change is the Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value]. (NCT00108082)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF was used

Interventionpercentage of change (Geometric Mean)
Carvedilol CR51.7
Atenolol48.3
Lisinopril-39.1

[back to top]

Model-adjusted Ratio to Baseline as Percentage Change From Baseline in Log Transformed C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 12

CRP concentration (milligrams per deciliter) was measured at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Percentage change from Baseline was based on log transformed data and calculated as 100 x (exponent (mean change on log scale) - 1). [Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.] (NCT00108082)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF was used)

Interventionpercentage of change (Geometric Mean)
Carvedilol CR-10.63
Atenolol-3.22
Lisinopril2.70

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in LV Filling Parameters as Measured by MRI at Month 12

LV filling parameters, LV E-Volume and LV A-Volume, were measured by MRI at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. These filling parameters represent the volumes of blood filling the ventricle during the passive filling phase (E-volume) and the active filling phase caused by atrial contraction (A-volume). (NCT00108082)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

,,
Interventionmilliliters (mL) (Mean)
LV E-volumeLV A-volume
Atenolol6.763-0.565
Carvedilol CR0.364-0.513
Lisinopril-3.4061.088

[back to top]

Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in LV End Systolic and Diastolic Volumes and Ejection Fraction as Measured by Echocardiography at Month 12

LV End Systolic and Diastolic Volumes and Ejection Fraction were measured by echocardiography at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. (NCT00108082)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

,,
Interventionmilliliters (mL) (Mean)
LV End Systolic VolumeLV End Diastolic VolumeLV Ejection Fraction
Atenolol-4.74-3.642.33
Carvedilol CR-3.38-3.071.03
Lisinopril-5.34-9.370.63

[back to top]

Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in LV End Systolic and Diastolic Volumes and Ejection Fraction as Measured by MRI at Month 12

LV End Systolic and Diastolic Volumes and Ejection Fraction were measured by MRI at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. The ejection fraction is the fraction of the blood volume available at the end of diastole that is pumped out of the ventricules during systole. (NCT00108082)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

,,
Interventionmilliliters (mL) (Mean)
LV End Systolic VolumeLV End Diastolic VolumeLV Ejection Fraction
Atenolol-4.29-2.452.16
Carvedilol CR-1.44-2.860.08
Lisinopril-3.04-7.45-0.01

[back to top]

Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 12

Systolic and Diastolic BP were measured at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. (NCT00108082)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

,,
InterventionmmHg (millimeters of mercury) (Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Atenolol-21.12-14.05
Carvedilol CR-21.32-12.77
Lisinopril-22.53-11.13

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Log Transformed Lipid Parameters at Month 12

Plasma lipid concentrations (milligrams per deciliter) were measured at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Percentage change from Baseline was based on log transformed data and calculated as 100 x (exponent(mean change on log scale) - 1). [Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.] (NCT00108082)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF was used)

,,
Interventionpercentage of change (Geometric Mean)
Total cholesterolLow-density lipid cholesterolHigh-density lipid cholesterolTriglycerides
Atenolol-1.3-4.0-4.77.1
Carvedilol CR0.70.0-4.311.0
Lisinopril-1.7-2.7-1.56.2

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure

Blood pressure measured with automatic blood pressure machine according to the guidelines of the American Heart Association. (NCT00241904)
Timeframe: Measured at 1 year

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Comprehensive Intervention Group130.8
Less Intensive Intervention Group135.9

[back to top]

Patients' Satisfaction With Care and Health Care Utilization

Patient satisfaction with care and healthcare utilization was measured with the Patient Assessment for Chronic Illness Care Scale (PACIC). The scores range from 0-5, with 5 being the most satisfied (NCT00241904)
Timeframe: Measured at 1 year

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Comprehensive Intervention Group2.9
Less Intensive Intervention Group1.8

[back to top]

Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Blood was drawn after a 12 hour fast and low density lipoprotein cholesterol was measured in a standardized lab (NCT00241904)
Timeframe: Measured at 1 year

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Comprehensive Intervention Group100.1
Less Intensive Intervention Group110.6

[back to top]

HbA1c

Fasting for 12 hour blood sample was measured in standardized lab (NCT00241904)
Timeframe: Measured at 1 year

Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Mean)
Comprehensive Intervention Group8.3
Less Intensive Intervention Group8.2

[back to top]

All-Cause Hospitalizations

(NCT00283686)
Timeframe: Up to 96 months

Interventionevents (Number)
ACE-I + ARB85
ACE-I Alone128
Low Blood Pressure Group93
Standard Blood Pressure Group120

[back to top]

Kidney Function (eGFR)

The estimated GFR was calculated by means of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation with the use of central serum creatinine measurements. (NCT00283686)
Timeframe: Up to 96 months (6 month assessments)

Interventionml/min/1.73/m2/yr (Mean)
ACE-I + ARB-3.0
ACE-I Alone-2.9
Low Blood Pressure Group-2.9
Standard Blood Pressure Group-3.0

[back to top]

Left Ventricular Mass Index

Left ventricular mass index (g/m^2) measured by MRI, centrally reviewed and measured (NCT00283686)
Timeframe: 0, 24 months, 48 months, 60 months

Interventionannual change in g/m^2 (Mean)
ACE-I + ARB-0.91
ACE-I Alone-0.83
Low Blood Pressure Group-1.17
Standard Blood Pressure Group-0.57

[back to top]

Quality of Life Physical Component Summary

Short Form-36 Quality of Life Physical Component Summary ranges from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome) (NCT00283686)
Timeframe: baseline, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96 months (assessed annually)

Interventionannual change in units on a scale (Mean)
ACE-I + ARB-0.24
ACE-I Alone-.23
Low Blood Pressure Group-0.17
Standard Blood Pressure Group-0.30

[back to top]

Renal Blood Flow

renal blood flow (mL/min/1.73 m^2) from MRI, centrally reviewed and measured. This outcome was more difficult to measure resulting in more missing data than other MRI outcomes such as total kidney volume (TKV) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI). (NCT00283686)
Timeframe: 0, 24 months, 48 months, 60 months

Interventionannual change in mL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
ACE-I + ARB-6.6
ACE-I Alone-9.5
Low Blood Pressure Group-7.6
Standard Blood Pressure Group-8.5

[back to top]

Study A: Percent Annual Change in Total Kidney Volume

Annual percentage change in total kidney volume as assessed by abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline, 2 years, 4 years, and 5 years follow-up. (NCT00283686)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2-, 4- and 5-year follow-up

Interventionpercentage of Total Kidney Volume (Mean)
ACE-I + ARB6.0
ACE-I Alone6.2
Low Blood Pressure Group5.6
Standard Blood Pressure Group6.6

[back to top]

Aldosterone

Urinary aldosterone excretion, centrally processed, 24 hour urine collection (NCT00283686)
Timeframe: Up to 96 months (assessed annually)

Interventionannual % change micrograms per 24 hr (Mean)
ACE-I + ARB-8.5
ACE-I Alone-7.3
Low Blood Pressure Group-8.5
Standard Blood Pressure Group-7.3

[back to top]

Albuminuria

Urine albumin excretion, centrally processed from 24 hour urine collection (NCT00283686)
Timeframe: Up to 96 months (assessed annually)

Interventionannual percent change in mg/24 hr (Mean)
ACE-I + ARB-1.1
ACE-I Alone-0.4
Low Blood Pressure Group-3.8
Standard Blood Pressure Group2.4

[back to top]

Quality of Life Mental Component Summary

Short Form-36 Quality of LIfe Mental Component Summary ranges from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome) (NCT00283686)
Timeframe: baseline, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96 months (assessed annually)

Interventionannual change in units on a scale (Mean)
ACE-I + ARB0.19
ACE-I Alone-0.06
Low Blood Pressure Group-0.05
Standard Blood Pressure Group0.18

[back to top]

Plasma B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) at Baseline

Plasma B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) measured at basline (NCT00292162)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionpicograms per millilitre (Mean)
Medical Therapy1846
Radiofrequency Ablation2550

[back to top]

Plasma B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) at 6 Months

Plasma B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) (NCT00292162)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpicograms per millilitre (Mean)
Medical Therapy1931
Radiofrequency Ablation2354

[back to top]

Plasma B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)

venous blood taken to assess levels of the above peptide. High evels of the peptide are associated with adverse prognosis. Blood levels are taken at baseline and 6 months. The change over 6 months is assessed, thereore it is possible to have a negative number if the level falls. (NCT00292162)
Timeframe: baseline and 6 months

Interventionpicograms per millilitre (Mean)
Medical Therapy85
Radiofrequency Ablation-196

[back to top]

Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)%

left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a measure of the % of blood ejected from the ventricle in one heart beat. It is a measure of cardiac function. We measured LVEF at baseline and at 6 months, to assess whether there had been a change in the patients cardiac function over time. (NCT00292162)
Timeframe: baseline and 6 months

Interventionpercentage of blood ejected in one beat (Mean)
Medical Therapy2.8
Radiofrequency Ablation4.5

[back to top]

Baseline Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Baseline Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)in % (NCT00292162)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionpercentage of blood ejected in one beat (Mean)
Medical Therapy43
Radiofrequency Ablation36

[back to top]

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)at 6 Months

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)at 6 months (NCT00292162)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of blood ejected in one beat (Mean)
Medical Therapy46
Radiofrequency Ablation41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in 24 Hour (hr) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was completed at Baseline and at the end of treatment/Week 6 or early withdrawal by standard electronic ABPM equipment worn by the subject for 24-hr of ambulatory activity. The 24 hr assessment period started at the time of the first reading and ended exactly 24 hr later on the following day. Data collected included mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP). (NCT00347360)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6.

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Lisinopril 10-5.79
Lisinopril 20-8.11
Lisinopril 40-7.37
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20-4.40
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40-7.61
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80-6.52
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 10-9.29
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 20-8.57
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 40-10.19
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 10-9.36
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 20-10.96
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 40-10.37
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 10-10.93
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 20-11.09
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 40-11.92

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in 24 Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was completed at Baseline and at the end of treatment/Week 6 or early withdrawal by standard electronic ABPM equipment worn by the subject for 24-hr of ambulatory activity. The 24 hr assessment period started at the time of the first reading and ended exactly 24 hr later on the following day. Data collected included mean systolic blood pressure (SBP). (NCT00347360)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Lisinopril 10-9.19
Lisinopril 20-13.58
Lisinopril 40-10.60
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20-6.15
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40-9.84
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80-10.38
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 10-12.06
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 20-11.58
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 40-14.16
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 10-11.68
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 20-14.03
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 40-13.90
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 10-15.60
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 20-15.93
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 40-15.59

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Trough Diastolic Blood Pressure

Trough ABPM was the average across 20-24 hr after dosing for each subject. (NCT00347360)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Lisinopril 10-6.40
Lisinopril 20-6.08
Lisinopril 40-8.16
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20-2.34
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40-7.76
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80-5.26
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 10-5.14
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 20-6.36
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 40-7.22
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 10-6.79
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 20-7.76
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 40-4.90
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 10-6.54
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 20-7.26
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 40-8.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Trough Systolic Blood Pressure

Trough ABPM was the average across 20-24 hr after dosing for each subject. (NCT00347360)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Lisinopril 10-9.47
Lisinopril 20-7.52
Lisinopril 40-9.54
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20-0.96
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40-9.27
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80-5.68
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 10-6.44
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 20-9.27
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 40-9.88
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 10-8.87
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 20-8.11
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 40-5.82
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 10-9.80
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 20-10.74
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 40-10.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Trough to Peak Ratios of DBP by 24 Hour ABPM (Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring)

Trough (20-24 hr) to peak (3-7 hr) ratios of DBP were examined in order to evaluate the extent to which once-daily criteria were met (ie trough:peak > 50%). Trough to peak ratios were calculated from change trough mean/change peak mean x 100. (NCT00347360)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

Interventiontrough:peak ratio x 100% (Number)
Lisinopril 10133.33
Lisinopril 2061.04
Lisinopril 40114.45
Carvedilol Controlled Release 2034.11
Carvedilol Controlled Release 4071.00
Carvedilol Controlled Release 8049.67
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 1044.50
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 2049.46
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 4059.47
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 1054.71
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 2052.86
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 4037.93
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 1041.95
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 2053.54
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 4052.07

[back to top]

Diastolic Responders, Defined as ≥ 10 mmHg Sitting (s)DBP Reduction From Baseline or a sDBP of <90 / 80 Millimeters (mm) of Mercury (Hg) for Non Diabetic / Diabetic Subjects Respectively (Based on Cuff Trough Measures)

(NCT00347360)
Timeframe: Week 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lisinopril 1022
Lisinopril 2023
Lisinopril 4027
Carvedilol Controlled Release 2020
Carvedilol Controlled Release 4018
Carvedilol Controlled Release 8017
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 1020
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 2028
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 4025
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 1030
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 2022
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 4027
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 1028
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 2024
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 4028

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Mean SBP and DBP Measured at Night by 24hr ABPM

Mean changes from Baseline to Week 6 in DBP and SBP measured by 24hr ABPM at the end of up-titration recorded in the night. The night-time assessment period started at the time of the first reading at or after 6 pm and ended immediately before 6 am on the following day. (NCT00347360)
Timeframe: Night BP, Baseline, Week 6

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change in Night SBP from Baseline to Week 6Change in Night DBP from Baseline to Week 6
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20-4.28-3.20
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 10-10.37-8.11
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 20-9.94-7.03
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 40-12.64-9.36
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40-7.70-6.49
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 10-10.02-8.23
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 20-11.87-9.34
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 40-11.25-9.09
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80-7.71-5.34
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 10-12.08-8.27
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 20-14.12-9.88
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 40-13.06-10.14
Lisinopril 10-9.01-5.83
Lisinopril 20-11.58-6.78
Lisinopril 40-10.38-7.49

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Mean Trough Sitting SBP and Sitting DBP by Cuff Assessment

Analysis of Change from Baseline to Week 6 in Mean sSBP and sDBP by Cuff Assessments at Drug Trough (20-24 hr) at End of Treatment Titration (NCT00347360)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change in sSBP by Cuff from Baseline to Week 6Change in sDBP by Cuff from Baseline to Week 6
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20-5.68-6.87
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 10-9.54-5.66
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 20-11.84-10.02
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 40-13.43-10.28
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40-5.07-5.70
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 10-9.79-8.73
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 20-11.26-10.89
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 40-13.49-9.63
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80-8.88-7.54
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 10-6.42-8.22
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 20-9.00-9.45
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 40-14.58-10.95
Lisinopril 10-11.97-7.45
Lisinopril 20-10.85-5.32
Lisinopril 40-13.09-10.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Mean SBP and DBP Measured in Morning by 24 Hour ABPM

Mean changes from Baseline to Week 6 in DBP and SBP measured by 24hr ABPM at the end of up-titration recorded in the morning. The morning assessment period started at or after 6 am and ended immediately before 12 noon. (NCT00347360)
Timeframe: Morning BP, Baseline, Week 6

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change in Morning SBP from Baseline to Week 6Change in Morning DBP from Baseline to Week 6
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20-6.23-5.01
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 10-13.89-9.21
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 20-10.22-7.86
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 40-14.50-10.04
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40-10.42-6.82
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 10-12.78-8.79
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 20-14.29-11.15
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 40-14.84-9.96
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80-13.70-7.53
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 10-17.09-11.95
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 20-14.52-10.71
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 40-17.12-12.46
Lisinopril 10-9.37-6.12
Lisinopril 20-14.53-9.20
Lisinopril 40-10.76-7.62

[back to top]

Dose-response Treatment Estimates: Change From Baseline to Week 6 in 24 Hour Mean DBP by ABPM (Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring)

Evaluation of the dose-response relationship between incremental doses of carvedilol CR and lisinopril and mean 24-hr ABPM DBP. (NCT00347360)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Lisinopril 10-5.77
Lisinopril 20-7.55
Lisinopril 40-7.49
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20-5.11
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40-6.61
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80-7.13
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 10-8.08
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 20-9.83
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 40-9.71
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 10-9.55
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 20-11.3
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 40-11.1
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 10-10.0
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 20-11.7
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 40-11.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Mean SBP and DBP Measured in Afternoon by 24hr ABPM

Mean changes from Baseline to Week 6 in SBP and DBP measured by 24hr ABPM at the end of up-titration recorded in the afternoon. The afternoon assessment period started at or after 12 noon and ended immediately before 6 pm. (NCT00347360)
Timeframe: Afternoon BP, Baseline, Week 6

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change in Afternoon SBP from Baseline to Week 6Change in Afternoon DBP from Baseline to Week 6
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20-9.69-6.27
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 10-13.96-11.28
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 20-15.54-12.04
Carvedilol Controlled Release 20 Lisinopril 40-16.38-11.59
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40-13.34-10.12
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 10-14.51-12.18
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 20-17.97-14.03
Carvedilol Controlled Release 40 Lisinopril 40-17.82-12.54
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80-13.76-8.38
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 10-20.91-15.12
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 20-20.46-13.87
Carvedilol Controlled Release 80 Lisinopril 40-19.36-15.02
Lisinopril 10-9.68-5.62
Lisinopril 20-17.21-10.25
Lisinopril 40-10.53-6.67

[back to top] [back to top]

Changes in Heart Failure Symptoms

Changes from baseline in the symptom score subset (question 3, 5, 7 and 9) of KCCQ (swelling, fatigue, shortness of breath, shortness of breath night time). KCCQ is a self-administered by patient symptom score, where higher score reflect better health status. Scale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100. This mean that the KCCQ scale is from 0 to 100 with the higher value showing a better health status. (NCT00391846)
Timeframe: 9 months and baseline

InterventionCategorial scale (Mean)
Guided by NT-proBNP3.67
Not Guided by NT-proBNP6.11

[back to top]

Changes in NT-proBNP Values Over Time in All Patients

The 95% confidential interval (CI) is given as measure of dispersion (NCT00391846)
Timeframe: 9 months and baseline

Interventionng/L (Geometric Mean)
Guided by NT-proBNP2332.1
Not Guided by NT-proBNP2063

[back to top]

Composite Value of 3 Variables After 9 Months: Cardiovascular Death (Days Alive), Cardiovascular Hospitalization (Days Out of Hospital), Heart Failure Symptoms (Symptom Score Subset of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire - Questions 3,5,7,9)

The non-parametric scale is constructed from 3 variables, modified after Cleland. Each patient receives a rank score from 1 to 246 (246-number of patients in the study). The lowest score receive patients who die (due to CV event), next patients still alive at end-of-study with the worst composite score, the best alive patients with 0 days in hospital and the largest improvement in the KCCQ (self-administered by patient symptom score, where the higher score reflect better health status). Scores will be summarized using non-parametric calculations. The mean of non-parametric scores is presented (NCT00391846)
Timeframe: 9 months

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Guided by NT-proBNP118.6
Not Guided by NT-proBNP128.4

[back to top]

Discontinuations

Number of patients discontinued due to adverse events' (NCT00391846)
Timeframe: 9 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Guided by NT-proBNP8
Not Guided by NT-proBNP6

[back to top]

Number of CV Deaths

Number of deaths (NCT00391846)
Timeframe: 9 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Guided by NT-proBNP4
Not Guided by NT-proBNP5

[back to top]

Number of Days in Hospital for CV Reason

Each overnight stay is counted as one day. The lower the better (NCT00391846)
Timeframe: 9 months

InterventionDays in hospital (Mean)
Guided by NT-proBNP5.79
Not Guided by NT-proBNP5.94

[back to top]

Total Number of Titration Steps in Prescribed Heart Failure Treatment

Each titration step in prescribed medication is counted as one step, either up or down. One step up indicates an increase of dose in prescribed medication and one step down indicates a decrease of dose in prescribed medication. The sum of steps is given as a score. Score is given for each arm as a total number of titration steps for all patients in arm. (NCT00391846)
Timeframe: 9 months

InterventionTitration steps (Number)
Guided by NT-proBNP517
Not Guided by NT-proBNP485

[back to top]

Change in Reactive Hyperemic Index by Period (Carvedilol CR + Lisinopril vs. Lisinopril + HCTZ)

Reactive hyperemic index is a measure of endothelial function. This is measured by the ratio of post-occlusion blood volume flow versus the baseline blood volume flow. The outcome reported is the change in this ratio after the first intervention phase compared to after the second intervention phase. (NCT00459056)
Timeframe: Change from three months to seven months

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Carvedilol CR + Lisinopril, Then Lisinopril +HCTZ-0.26
Lisinopril + HCTZ, Then Carvedilol CR + Lisinopril-0.14

[back to top]

Change in Disease Score (DS) Among the Treatment Groups

Rasmussen Disease Score (RDS) Change From Baseline to 9 Months A score of six or higher on these tests means the patient likely has plaque build-up in the arteries, or atherosclerosis, while a score of three to five suggests that such a problem may be developing. A score of two or less signals a patient is fine but should return in the future for another test. The method detects disease at the earliest moment, before the traditionally used calcium score would show any signs of trouble. (NCT00553969)
Timeframe: Baseline and nine months

InterventionOverall Rasmussen Disease Score Change (Mean)
1 Coreg CR + Lisinopril-2.48
2 Coreg CR + Placebo-2.29
3 Lisinopril + Placebo-2.38
4 Placebo + Placebo-0.96

[back to top]

A Renal Composite Endpoint, Defined as; Reduction in Estimated GFR of >50% (for Individuals With Baseline GFR <60) or Reduction in GFR of >30 (for Individuals With Baseline GFR >= GFR 60) or ESRD.

Time to the first event of reduction in estimated GFR of >50% (for individuals with baseline GFR <60) or reduction in GFR of >30 (for individuals with baseline GFR >= GFR 60) or ESRD. (NCT00555217)
Timeframe: From enrollment to time of first event, up to 4.5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Combination of ARB and ACEI77
Monotherapy ARB101

[back to top]

A Composite Endpoint of Reduction in Estimated GFR of 30ml/Min/1.73m*m in Individuals w/a Baseline Estimated GFR >= 60 ml/Min/1.73m*m, Reduction in Estimated GFR >50% in Individuals w/ Baseline Estimated GFR <60ml/Min/1.73m*m; ESRD or Death

Time to the first event of reduction in estimated GFR of 30ml/min/1.73m*m in individuals w/a baseline estimated GFR >= 60 ml/min/1.73m*m, reduction in estimated GFR >50% in individuals w/ baseline estimated GFR <60ml/min/1.73m*m; ESRD or death. (NCT00555217)
Timeframe: From enrollemnt to time of first primary event, up to 4.5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Combination of ARB and ACEI132
Monotherapy ARB152

[back to top]

Serious Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Events That Led to Trial Termination

Cardiovascular events were counted by subject and included the following: myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF), hospitalized angina, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization and heart valve replacement. Adverse events reported are those during the course of 12 months of participation in the trial. All serious adverse events were adjudicated by R.A. and A.D.S. who were masked to the drug assignment at the time of adjudication. The duration of participation in the study per subject, which according to the trial design could be up to 12 months, was determined. The cardiovascular event rate was calculated by treatment group assignment. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) by treatment was then determined along with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). As a post hoc analysis, we also determined the narrower definition of cardiovascular events per group that included MI, stroke, CHF, or cardiovascular death. (NCT00582114)
Timeframe: 1 yr

,
Interventionevents/100 patient-years (Number)
Incidence rate, cardiovasular eventsIncidence rate, combined MI, stroke, CHF, CV deathIncidence rate, congest heart failureIncidence rate, all-cause hospitalizations
Atenolol24.613.56.289.9
Lisinopril583120.2144.3

[back to top]

The Primary End Point is the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) by Echocardiographic Criteria From Baseline to 1 Year.

The primary outcome of the study was the average reduction in left ventricular mass indexed for body surface area from baseline to 1 year. A mixed model was used with left ventricular mass index (LVMI) as the outcome variable. Fixed effects were indicator variables for time, treatment and their interaction. Random effect was subject and statistical inference was made using the maximum likelihood estimator. No imputation was made for missing data. (NCT00582114)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

,
Interventiong/m^2 (Mean)
LVMI Change from baseline, 6 monthsLVMI Change from baseline, 12 months
Atenolol-8.4-21.5
Lisinopril-3.4-15.1

[back to top]

Cognitive Assessment: Trail Making Test Part B

This test requires the connection of sequentially numbered circles (A), and the connection of circles marked by numbers and letters in alternating sequence (B). This test is considered a benchmark of executive function. The test score is the time required to complete the task in seconds. (NCT00605072)
Timeframe: Baseline-12 months

Interventionseconds (Least Squares Mean)
ACEI (Lisinopril)-14
ARB (Candesartan)17
HCTZ4

[back to top]

Blood Flow Velocity, Sitting

This reports the change in the least square mean from baseline to 12 months, adjusted for age (NCT00605072)
Timeframe: Baseline-12 months

Interventioncm/sec (Least Squares Mean)
ACEI (Lisinopril)-0.3
ARB (Candesartan)-2.85
HCTZ0.35

[back to top]

Blood Pressure Outcome: Systolic BP

Blood pressure was measured as follows: the participant was in the sitting position, rested for 5 minutes, no caffeine or smoking 2 hours prior to measurement, using appropriate cuff size (covering 60% of upper arm length and 80% of arm circumference), correct cuff placement (1-2 inches above brachial pulse on bare arm), and the bell of the stethoscope. The systolic blood pressure was defined as the pressure corresponding to the first korotkoff sounds (K1) and the diastolic as the pressure corresponding to the last korotkoff sound (K5). Blood pressure was measured in both arms and recorded (NCT00605072)
Timeframe: Baseline-12 months

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
ACEI (Lisinopril)28
ARB (Candesartan)27
HCTZ21

[back to top]

Cognitive Assessment: Forward Digit Span Test

This test consists of series of digits of increasing length, some of which are recited as presented, and some of which are to be recited in reversed order. The forward digit span score ranges from 0 (ie cannot repeat two digits) to 8 ( participant can repeat up to 8 digits) (NCT00605072)
Timeframe: Baseline-12 months

Interventionnumber of digits repeated (Least Squares Mean)
ACEI (Lisinopril)-0.3
ARB (Candesartan)0.02
HCTZ-0.04

[back to top]

Cognitive Assessment: Hopkins Verbal Learning- Immediate Recall

This is a 12-item list learning test in which individuals are presented three learning and recall trials followed by a delayed recall and 24 item recognition test. The HVLT-R has been identified as an ideal memory measure for elderly patients, and appropriate reliability and validity have been shown in older individuals. The test score is the number of correct answers in the delayed recall ( score range 0-12) (NCT00605072)
Timeframe: Baseline-12 months

Interventionnumber words remembered (Least Squares Mean)
ACEI (Lisinopril)-1
ARB (Candesartan)-2
HCTZ-3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (sSBP) and Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (sDBP) at Week 6

Mean change was calculated as Week 6 values minus Baseline values. (NCT00624065)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
sSBP (mmHg)sDBP (mmHg)
Carvedilol CR + Lisinopril-16.07-9.14
Lisinopril-17.05-10.15

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Mean Sitting Cuff Blood Pressure <140/90 mmHg at the End of 6 Weeks of Treatment

Sitting cuff blood pressure was calculated as the mean of three measurements taken approximately 2 minutes apart, and before the morning dose. (NCT00624065)
Timeframe: Week 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Responders (mean BP <140/90 mmHg)Non-responders (SBP >/=140 mmHg or DBP >/=90 mmHg)
Carvedilol CR + Lisinopril13764
Lisinopril13964

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving Blood Pressure Goals

Percentage of subjects who achieved JNC-VII defined blood pressure goals. (NCT00661895)
Timeframe: 3 month intervals

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Intervention81
Control57

[back to top]

Plasma Glucose Level After an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

Change from Baseline in Plasma Glucose 2 Hours Post-oral Glucose 75 grams, given as part of an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT). Last Observation Carried Forward. (NCT00673790)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline Visit 3 or 4 (Week -2 or 0) To Visit 8 (Week 12)

Interventiong/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Nebivolol0.20
Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)0.31
Placebo-0.21

[back to top]

Trough Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure

Change from Baseline in Mean Seated Trough Cuff Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 12, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). (NCT00673790)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline Visit 4 (Week 0) To Visit 8 (Week 12)

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Nebivolol-9.4
Placebo-5.0

[back to top]

Mean Seated Trough Cuff Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 12

Change from Baseline in Mean Seated Trough Cuff Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 12, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). (NCT00734630)
Timeframe: From baseline Visit 5 (Week 0) to Visit 10 (Week 12)

InterventionmmHG (Mean)
Nebivolol-7.8
Placebo-3.5

[back to top]

Mean Seated Trough Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 12

Change from Baseline in Mean Seated Trough Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 12, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). (NCT00734630)
Timeframe: From baseline Visit 5 (Week 0) to Visit 10 (Week 12)

InterventionmmHG (Mean)
Nebivolol-10.1
Placebo-7.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Reduction in Proteinuria at 6 Months by > 50% of the Value at Screening AND Stable GFR Defined as Greater Than 75 ml/Min/1.73m2 in Those With an Initial Value Above 90 OR Within 25% of Baseline for Remaining Patients

Number of participants with a reduction in proteinuria at 6 months by > 50% of the value at screening AND stable GFR defined as greater than 75 ml/min/1.73m2 in those with an initial value above 90 OR within 25% of baseline for remaining patients. (NCT00814255)
Timeframe: baseline and 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Conservative Medical Therapy Plus Adalimumab0
Conservative Medical Therapy (Lisinopril, Losartan, Atorvastat2
Conservative Medical Therapy Plus Galactose2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

(NCT00814255)
Timeframe: Up to 7 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Conservative Medical Therapy Plus Adalimumab7
Conservative Medical Therapy (Lisinopril, Losartan, Atorvastat7
Conservative Medical Therapy Plus Galactose7

[back to top]

Mean Vascular Stiffness As Measured by PWV

"Comparison between Participants with Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and age matched Controls without CKD. The numbers reported are the mean of all the participants in the group at two points in time - the baseline and at 12 months for CFPWV, CBPWV, and CRPWV.~Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (CFPWV) Carotid-Brachial Pulse Wave Velocity (CBPWV) Carotid-Radial Pulse Wave Velocity (CRPWV)" (NCT00874432)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 months

,,,
Interventionm/s (Mean)
CBPWV BaselineCBPWV 12 monthsCRPWV BaselineCRPWV 12 monthsCFPWV BaselineCFPWV 12 months
Age Matched Control8.178.068.959.439.559.79
Age Matched Control-ACE-I9.148.659.758.169.968.33
Chronic Kidney Disease6.288.284.808.667.9510.66
Chronic Kidney Disease-ACE-I7.878.409.038.5710.2011.07

[back to top]

Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV)

PWV will be measured in patients over age 60 with stage 3 CKD and age matched controls without CKD. (NCT00874432)
Timeframe: up to 12 months

,
Interventionm/s (Mean)
Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave VelocityCarotid-Brachial Pulse Wave VelocityCarotid-Radial Pulse Wave Velocity
Age Matched Control9.968.578.38
Chronic Kidney Disease9.907.629.03

[back to top]

Changes in Blood Pressure

Blood pressure was assessed by standard clinical methods (i.e., the same way it is measured during a routine clinic visit) (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: change from baseline to 4 months

Intervention(mmHG) (Mean)
Systolic BPDiastolic BP
Lisinopril/L-placebo Treatment Effect-1.8-3.3

[back to top]

Changes in Small Artery Elasticity

Small artery elasticity is a measure of vascular function, estimated through analysis of the blood pressure waveform. A sensor is placed on wrist over the radial pulse. The blood pressure waveform of the pulse is recorded and analyzed the elasticity, or compliance, of the small (and large) vasculature. Impaired artery elasticity, or increased stiffness, is an early sign of vascular disease that predicts risk for future cardiovascular events. (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: change from baseline to 4 months

InterventionmL/mmHgx100 (Mean)
Lisinopril/L-placebo Treatment Effect0.02

[back to top]

Changes IL-6 (Interleukin-6)

This biomarker represents systemic inflammation within in the body. (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: change from baseline to 4 months

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Lisinopril/L-placebo Treatment Effect-0.33

[back to top]

Changes hsCRP (C-reactive Protein)

This biomarker represents systemic inflammation within in the body. (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: change from baseline to 4 months

Interventionmcg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Lisinopril/L-placebo Treatment Effect-1.00

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Stated (by Self-report) That They Had Side Effects

Participants were asked at each visit if they had any side effects to study medication. They provided a yes or no answer, and if yes they specified what the side effect was. (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lisinopril/P-placebo1
L-placebo/Pravastatin0
Lisinopril/Pravastatin2
L-placebo/P-placebo1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Month 4 in the Framingham Risk Score (FRS)

The Framingham Risk Score is calculated by a published algorithm that predicts a patients risk of having a coronary heart disease event in the next 10 years. The measures that are considering in predicting this risk are: age, blood pressure, cholesterol (both total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), smoking status, and use of medication to treat hypertension. This risk score can be estimated using an online calculator (http://hp2010.nhlbihin.net/atpiii/calculator.asp) (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 4 months

InterventionPercent probability of CHD event in 10yr (Median)
Lisinopril/P-placebo-1.6
L-placebo/Pravastatin-0.7
Lisinopril/Pravastatin-1.5
L-placebo/P-placebo-0.3

[back to top]

Changes in Blood Lipids

Blood lipids include routine cholesterol measurements that are monitored in clinical practice. They are measured in blood after a blood draw is performed. The specific measurements include: a) total cholesterol, b) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, c) high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and d) triglycerides (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: change from baseline to 4 months

Intervention(mg/dL) (Mean)
Total CholesterolLDL-CHDL-C
Pravastatin/P-placebo Treatment Effect-1.75-0.620.97

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Took >90% of Their Doses (by Pill Count)

The number of pills missing from study medication bottles was counted by study nurses at the completion of the study. The proportion of pills taken divided by the number of days the participant was enrolled in the study was calculated, and multiplied by 100, to generate the '% of doses taken' (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lisinopril/P-placebo2
L-placebo/Pravastatin7
Lisinopril/Pravastatin5
L-placebo/P-placebo6

[back to top]

Changes TNFa (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha)

This biomarker represents systemic inflammation within in the body. (NCT00982189)
Timeframe: change from baseline to 4 months

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Lisinopril/L-placebo Treatment Effect-0.14

[back to top]

Quality-of-life Changes Between Baseline and 52-weeks

Quality-of-life changes as assessed by North European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30), which measures the quality of life of cancer patients. Higher score indicates higher quality of life. Score range is 0-100. The questionnaire was administered at baseline and at 52 weeks. (NCT01009918)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Arm I Lisinopril1
Arm II Coreg CR®2
Arm III Placebo5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Cardiotoxicity-free Survival at 750 Days From Baseline

Number of Participants with cardiotoxicity-free survival at 750 days from baseline (NCT01009918)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I Lisinopril15
Arm II Coreg CR®24
Arm III Placebo17

[back to top]

Number of Participants With LVEF Decrease to <50%

Number of Participants with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) drop to <50% (NCT01009918)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I Lisinopril5
Arm II Coreg CR®9
Arm III Placebo15

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Trastuzumab-Induced Cardiotoxicity After 52 Weeks of Treatment

Reduction in incidence of trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity after 52 weeks of treatment as measured by preservation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF). Number of Patients who experienced a cardiotoxicity. (NCT01009918)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I Lisinopril45
Arm II Coreg CR®43
Arm III Placebo46

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Trastuzumab Course Interruption

Measure indicates the number of patients who had an interruption of trastuzumab for any reason (NCT01009918)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I Lisinopril27
Arm II Coreg CR®24
Arm III Placebo40

[back to top]

The Change From Baseline in Trough Seated Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 6.

(NCT01218100)
Timeframe: Visit 6/(Week 0) and Visit 9/(Week 6)

Interventionmm HG (Mean)
Placebo-9.9
Nebivolol + Lisinopril (Combination)-19.2
Nebivolol-14.4
Lisinopril-16.1

[back to top]

The Change From Baseline in Trough Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 6.

(NCT01218100)
Timeframe: Visit 6/(Week 0) and Visit 9/(Week 6)

Interventionmm HG (Mean)
Placebo-8.0
Nebivolol + Lisinopril (Combination)-17.2
Nebivolol-13.3
Lisinopril-12.0

[back to top]

Changes in Ang1-7 Levels Among Patients After ACE-I/ARB Treatment Measured in Picogram/Milliliter

(NCT01234922)
Timeframe: 7 days post-baseline

InterventionPicogram/milliliter (Mean)
Arm I13.25
Arm II33.67
Arm III6.685
Arm IV5.045

[back to top]

Mean, 24-hour Blood Pressure (Collected by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring [ABPM]) in Response to Co-administration of LY2189265 and Lisinopril

(NCT01324388)
Timeframe: Day -1, Day 3, Day 24 of Part 1

,
Interventionmillimeter of mercury (mm Hg) (Mean)
Systolic, Day -1 (Baseline)Systolic, Day 3 (n=21, 6)Systolic, Day 24 (n=18, 6)Diastolic, Day -1 (Baseline)Diastolic, Day 3 (n=21, 6)Diastolic, Day 24 (n=18, 6)
Part 1: LY2189265 + Lisinopril129.4125.3121.176.977.173.8
Part 1: Placebo + Lisinopril130.1127.1123.874.172.671.2

[back to top]

Mean, 24-hour Blood Pressure (Collected by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring [ABPM]) in Response to Co-administration of LY2189265 and Metoprolol

(NCT01324388)
Timeframe: Day -1, Day 4, Day 7 of Treatment 2 in Part 2

Interventionmillimeter of mercury (mm Hg) (Mean)
Systolic, Day -1 (Baseline)Systolic, Day 4 (n=18)Systolic, Day 7Diastolic, Day -1 (Baseline)Diastolic, Day 4 (n=18)Diastolic, Day 7
Part 2: LY2189265 + Metoprolol (Treatment 2)123.0115.4116.272.867.271.8

[back to top]

Mean, 24-hour Heart Rate (Collected by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring [ABPM]) in Response to Co-administration of LY2189265 and Lisinopril

(NCT01324388)
Timeframe: Day -1, Day 3, Day 24 of Part 1

,
Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Mean)
Day -1 (Baseline)Day 3 (n=21, 6)Day 24 (n=18, 6)
Part 1: LY2189265 + Lisinopril69.878.377.1
Part 1: Placebo + Lisinopril68.969.371.6

[back to top]

Mean, 24-hour Heart Rate (Collected by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring [ABPM]) in Response to Co-administration of LY2189265 and Metoprolol

(NCT01324388)
Timeframe: Day -1, Day 4, Day 7 of Treatment 2 in Part 2

Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Mean)
Day -1 (Baseline)Day 4 (n=18)Day 7
Part 2: LY2189265 + Metoprolol (Treatment 2)63.755.869.4

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics, Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) of Metoprolol When Administered With LY2189265

(NCT01324388)
Timeframe: Day 4 and Day 7 of Treatment 2 in Part 2

Interventionnanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 4Day 7 (n=17)
Part 2: LY2189265 + Metoprolol Crossover617813

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics, Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Lisinopril

(NCT01324388)
Timeframe: Day -1, Day 3, Day 24 in Part 1

,
Intervention(nanograms per milliliter) per milligram (Geometric Mean)
Day -1 (Baseline)Day 3 (n=22, 8)Day 24 (n=18, 6)
Part 1: LY2189265 + Lisinopril122114115
Part 1: Placebo + Lisinopril138138110

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics, Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Metoprolol When Administered With LY2189265

(NCT01324388)
Timeframe: Day 4 and Day 7 of Treatment 2 in Part 2

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 4Day 7 (n=19)
Part 2: LY2189265 + Metoprolol Crossover35.747.2

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics, Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) of Lisinopril

(NCT01324388)
Timeframe: Day -1, Day 3, Day 24 of Part 1

,
Intervention(nanograms*hours/milliliter)/milligram (Geometric Mean)
Day -1 (Baseline)Day 3 (n=22, 8)Day 24 (n=18, 6)
Part 1: LY2189265 + Lisinopril158016601540
Part 1: Placebo + Lisinopril174017201390

[back to top]

Adverse Events Monitoring

The patients were encouraged to report every event promptly by phone to one of the authors (NOG), no matter however minor.Blood pressure measurements were done with mercury sphygmomanometers fitted with adult-size cuffs (Accoson, England). Serum potassium levels were estimated using the flame photometric method as described by Davidson and Henry (NCT01409837)
Timeframe: At weeks 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, 102, 114,138, 186 and 282

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Group B (Lisinopril First, Then Placebo)0
Group A (Placebo First, Then Lisinopril)0

[back to top]

Changes From Baseline in the Seminal Fluid Characteristics Throughout the Study

The seminal fluid characteristics were assessed twice before the entry of each patient and both at least two-weeks apart. The two values were averaged and recorded as baseline for week 0 while subsequent changes from the baseline were monitored during each of the scheduled visits at weeks 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, 102, 114, 138, 186 and 282. The two groups swopped treatments at the 96th week. The number of pregnancies achieved was also documented throughout the study period. (NCT01409837)
Timeframe: Week 96.

Interventionml (Geometric Mean)
Group B (Lisinopril First, Then Placebo)3.47
Group A (Placebo First, Then Lisinopril)3.20

[back to top]

Ejaculate Volume

The volume in milliliters of seminal fluid produced per ejaculation. (NCT01409837)
Timeframe: Week 282

Interventionml (Geometric Mean)
Group B (Lisinopril First, Then Placebo)3.73
Group A (Placebo First, Then Lisinopril)3.55

[back to top]

Proportion of Sperm Cells With Abnormal Morphology (%)

Proportion (per cent) of sperm cells with abnormal appearance (NCT01409837)
Timeframe: Week 96

Interventionper cent (Geometric Mean)
Group B (Lisinopril First, Then Placebo)15.95
Group A (Placebo First, Then Lisinopril)44.73

[back to top]

Proportion of Sperm Cells With Abnormal Morphology (%)

The proportion (per cent) of the total number of sperm cell with abnormal appearance. (NCT01409837)
Timeframe: Week 282

InterventionPer cent (Geometric Mean)
Group B (Lisinopril First, Then Placebo)28.55
Group A (Placebo First, Then Lisinopril)12.14

[back to top]

Proportion of Sperm Cells With Normal Motility (%)

The proportion (per cent) of the sperm cells exhibiting both rhythmic and propulsive movements considered to be of normal intensity. (NCT01409837)
Timeframe: Week 282

InterventionPer cent (Geometric Mean)
Group B (Lisinopril First, Then Placebo)14.45
Group A (Placebo First, Then Lisinopril)29.99

[back to top]

Proportion of Sperm Cells With Normal Motility (%)

This was determined as the proportion (percent) of the total sperm cells exhibiting both rhythmic and propulsive movements considered to be of normal intensity. (NCT01409837)
Timeframe: Week 96

InterventionPer cent (Geometric Mean)
Group B (Lisinopril First, Then Placebo)31.08
Group A (Placebo First, Then Lisinopril)21.90

[back to top]

Total Sperm Cell Count

The total number of sperm cells found in each milliliter of seminal fluid. (NCT01409837)
Timeframe: Week 282

InterventionMillions/ml (Geometric Mean)
Group B (Lisinopril First, Then Placebo)12.86
Group A (Placebo First, Then Lisinopril)13.81

[back to top]

Total Sperm Cell Count Per Milliliter of Seminal Fluid.

the number of sperm cells counted per milliliter volume of seminal fluid (NCT01409837)
Timeframe: Week 96

InterventionMillions/ml (Mean)
Group B (Lisinopril First, Then Placebo)17.02
Group A (Placebo First, Then Lisinopril)7.17

[back to top]

PK - Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug in Plasma (Cmax)

At the Day 14 (±3 days) visit, blood (1 mL) will be collected at 0 hour (pre-dose) and at 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-lisinopril dose for determination of Cmax. Geometric mean was calculated from all measurements. (NCT01491919)
Timeframe: Day14 (+/- 3 d) of dose at 0 hour and 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 12, and 24 hrs after dose

Interventionng/ml (Geometric Mean)
Low Dose: Lisinopril20.9
Medium Dose: Lisinopril47.7
High Dose: Lisinopril58.0

[back to top]

PK - Oral Clearance (CL/F)

At the Day 14 (±3 days) visit, blood (1 mL) will be collected at 0 hour (pre-dose) and at 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-lisinopril dose for determination of CL/F. Geometric mean was calculated from all measurements. (NCT01491919)
Timeframe: Day 14 (+/- 3 d) of dose at 0 hour and at 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 12, and 24 hrs after dose

InterventionL/h/70 kg (Geometric Mean)
Low Dose: Lisinopril17.9
Medium Dose: Lisinopril18.6
High Dose: Lisinopril32.8

[back to top]

PK - Time of the Maximum Observed Concentration in Plasma (Tmax)

At the Day 14 (±3 days) visit, blood (1 mL) will be collected at 0 hour (pre-dose) and at 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-lisinopril dose for determination of plasma lisinopril concentration. Medium was calculated from all measurements. (NCT01491919)
Timeframe: Day 14 (+/- 3 d) of dose at 0 hour and 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 12, and 24 hrs after dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Low Dose: Lisinopril5.0
Medium Dose: Lisinopril5.0
High Dose: Lisinopril4.5

[back to top]

PK Renal Clearance (CLrenal)

At the Day 14 (±3 days) visit, blood (1 mL) will be collected at 0 hour (pre-dose) and at 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-lisinopril dose for determination of CLrenal. Geometric mean was calculated from all measurements. (NCT01491919)
Timeframe: Day 14 (+/- 3 d) of dose at 0 hour and 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 12, and 24 hrs after dose.

InterventionL/h/70 kg (Geometric Mean)
Low Dose: Lisinopril3.4
Medium Dose: Lisinopril3.4
High Dose: Lisinopril6.8

[back to top]

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline in Lisinopril SOC Group

Lisinopril SOC participants were not given the ambulatory blood pressure machine to obtain readings at home, as was the Lisinopril-naive participants. Instead BP measurements were obtained during screening visit and compared to the Day 14 to 40 visit measurements (note: the participants were not required to attend a Day 14 (+/-3 day visit) but did need to attend sometime between Day 14 to Day 40. The mean from the blood pressure measurements was calculated. (NCT01491919)
Timeframe: Screening to Day 14 to 40

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
eGFR 30-59 ml/min per 1.73m2 (n=2, 2, 0)eGFR >=60 ml/min per 1.73m2 (n=5, 2, 0)
Low Dose: Lisinopril-6.03.4
Medium Dose: Lisinopril-6.5-3.0

[back to top]

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline in Lisinopril-naive Participants

"Ambulatory blood pressure readings were measured during the baseline/pre-study dose period using a SpaceLabs (Redmond, WA) device at home to avoid the confounding effects of venipuncture and abnormal sleep pattern.~Another blood pressure reading was performed at 1 day before the final dose of lisinopril (day before the last scheduled visit).~The mean of these measurements was calculated." (NCT01491919)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 14 (+/-3 days)

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
eGFR 30-59 ml/min per 1.73m^2 (n=3, 1, 0)eGFR >=60 ml/min per 1.73m^2 (n=3, 5, 3)
High Dose: LisinoprilNA-4.0
Low Dose: Lisinopril-4.0-9.0
Medium Dose: Lisinopril7.0-6.0

[back to top]

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (BP) From Baseline in Lisinopril SOC Group

Lisinopril SOC participants were not given the ambulatory blood pressure machine to obtain readings at home, as was the Lisinopril-naive participants. Instead BP measurements were obtained during screening visit and compared to the Day 14 to 40 visit measurements. Note: these participants were not required to attend a Day 14 (+/-3 day visit) but did need to attend sometime between Day 14 to Day 40 (inclusive). The mean of these blood pressure measurements was calculated. (NCT01491919)
Timeframe: Screening to Day 14 to 40

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
eGFR 30-59 ml/min per 1.73m2 (n=2, 2, 0)eGFR >=60 ml/min per 1.73m2 (n=5, 2, 0)
Low Dose: Lisinopril-6.06.4
Medium Dose: Lisinopril-1.0-1.0

[back to top]

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline in Lisinopril-naive Participants

"Ambulatory blood pressure readings were measured during the baseline/pre-study dose period using a SpaceLabs (Redmond, WA) device at home to avoid the confounding effects of venipuncture and abnormal sleep pattern.~Another blood pressure reading was performed at 1 day before the final dose of lisinopril (day before the last scheduled visit).~The mean from these measurements was calculated." (NCT01491919)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 14 (+/- 3 days)

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
eGFR 30-59 ml/min per 1.73m2 (n=3, 1, 0)eGFR >+60 ml/min per 1.732 (n=3, 5, 3)
High Dose: LisinoprilNA-11.3
Low Dose: Lisinopril-5.0-6.7
Medium Dose: Lisinopril-6.0-8.8

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During/After Study Drug Administration

Number of Adverse Events (AEs) related and not related to study drug; number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) related and not related to study drug (NCT01491919)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug to 30 days after final study visit for AEs and until resolution for SAEs

,
Interventionevents (Number)
AEsAE related to study drugAEs not related to study drugSAESAE not related to study drug
Lisinopril Standard of Care (SOC)1201200
Lisinopril-naive125711

[back to top]

Worse Post-dose Decrease in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Baseline in Lisinopril-naive Participants

The eGFR at entry will need to be ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73m^2 to minimize concerns about an acute angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I)-mediated reduction in kidney function. eGFR ratio was computed from the worst post-dose value divided by the Baseline value. (NCT01491919)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 14 (+/- 3 days)

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
Low Dose: Lisinopril1
Medium Dose: Lisinopril1.02
High Dose: Lisinopril0.89

[back to top]

Change in Potassium Level From Baseline in Lisinopril-naive Participants

Potassium values will be obtained at Baseline and Day 14 prior to the final dose of study drug. Mean calculated from the two measurements. (NCT01491919)
Timeframe: At baseline visit and Day 14 prior to final study dose.

InterventionmEq/L (Mean)
Low Dose: Lisinopril0.1
Medium Dose: Lisinopril-0.3
High Dose: Lisinopril0.3

[back to top]

Change in Urine Protein/Creatinine From Baseline in Lisinopril-naive Participants.

Change in urine protein/creatinine obtained as follows: Mean change (worst post-dose from baseline) presented for urine protein/creatinine ratio. Geometric mean of the ratio (worst post-dose / baseline with Geometric Coefficient of Variation percent (CV%) and greatest decrease presented for eGFR by dose group. Two patients in the high dose group had an evaluable urine protein/creatinine change. (NCT01491919)
Timeframe: Baseline to worst post-dose before Day 14 (+/- 3 days)

Interventionmg/mg (Geometric Mean)
Low Dose: Lisinopril-0.45
Medium Dose: Lisinopril-0.08
High Dose: Lisinopril-0.74

[back to top]

Largest eGFR Percent Decrease From Baseline in Lisinopril-naive Participants

"The eGFR at entry will need to be ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73m^2 to minimize concerns about an acute angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) mediated reduction in kidney function.~Largest eGFR percent decrease from baseline reported in results section." (NCT01491919)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 14 (+/- 3 days)

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Low Dose: Lisinopril15
Medium Dose: Lisinopril12
High Dose: Lisinopril21

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK) - Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC)

At the Day 14 (±3 days) visit, blood (1 mL) will be collected at 0 hour (pre-dose) and at 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-lisinopril dose for determination of AUC. Geometric mean was calculated from all measurements. (NCT01491919)
Timeframe: Day 14 (+/- 3 days) of lisinopril therapy at hours 0 (pre-dose) and 1,2,4,5,8,12 and 24 hrs after dose

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Low Dose: Lisinopril298
Medium Dose: Lisinopril640
High Dose: Lisinopril702

[back to top]

Change in HIV DNA (Copies/Million Rectal Cells)

Change in HIV DNA measured in GALT (gut-associated lymphoid tissue) from baseline (NCT01535235)
Timeframe: 22 weeks

Interventioncopies/million rectal cells (Median)
ACE Inhibitor-38.4
Placebo-53.8

[back to top]

Change in HIV RNA (Copies/Million Rectal Cells)

Change in HIV RNA measured in GALT (gut-associated lymphoid tissue) from baseline (NCT01535235)
Timeframe: 22 weeks

Interventioncopies/million rectal cells (Median)
ACE Inhibitor1.1
Placebo-0.2

[back to top]

Blood Pressure Control, as Defined as Office BP Measurement of <140 mmHg Systolic and <90 mmHg Diastolic

At each study visit (approximately every 30 days), participants' BP will be checked. If BP is controlled (<140mmHG systolic and <90mmHG diastolic), then current medication will continue. If BP is uncontrolled, medication will be revised every 30 days (up to 120) until BP control is achieved. (NCT01658657)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PRA-guided Therapy3
Fixed-dose Combination Treatment-guided Therapy1

[back to top]

Postoperative Hypotension

Any systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg (NCT01669434)
Timeframe: Arrival in PACU to hospital discharge, an expected average of 4 days.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ACEI Omission15
ACEI Continuation31

[back to top]

Low Blood Pressure Subgroup

Only patients with systolic blood pressure less than 110 at preoperative evaluation will be included in this analysis. The outcome is the same as the primary outcome: Intraoperative Systolic Blood Pressure under 80 mmHg. (NCT01669434)
Timeframe: During anesthesia, an expected average of 3 hours.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ACEI Omission4
ACEI Continuation2

[back to top]

Acute Renal Failure

Creatinine increase of more than 0.3 mg/dl or more than 50% from preoperative level (NCT01669434)
Timeframe: Arrival in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) to hospital discharge, an expected average of 4 days.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ACEI Omission6
ACEI Continuation10

[back to top]

Postoperative Hypertension

Any systolic blood pressure greater than 180 mmHg. (NCT01669434)
Timeframe: Arrival in PACU to hospital discharge, an expected average of 4 days.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ACEI Omission33
ACEI Continuation17

[back to top]

Older Age Subgroup

Only patients above the age of 64 will be included in this analysis. The outcome is the same as the primary outcome: Intraoperative Systolic Blood Pressure under 80 mmHg (NCT01669434)
Timeframe: During anesthesia, an expected average of 3 hours.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ACEI Omission48
ACEI Continuation49

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Interoperative Hypotension

Number of Participants with Interoperative Hypotension (systolic blood pressure under 80 mmHg) (NCT01669434)
Timeframe: During anesthesia, an expected average of 3 hours.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ACEI Omission76
ACEI Continuation95

[back to top]

Urinary Aldosterone Excretion Measurements Following 1 Week of ACE Inhibitor Therapy

(NCT01691781)
Timeframe: 1 week

Interventionmcg/24 hours (Mean)
Primary Hyperparathyroidism7.8
Normal6.1

[back to top]

Serum Calcium Following 1 Week of ACE Inhibitor Administration

(NCT01691781)
Timeframe: 1 week

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Primary Hyperparathyroidism10.5
Normal9.5

[back to top]

Parathyroid Hormone Following 1 Week of ACE Inhibitor Administration

PTH values 1 week following ACE inhibitor therapy (NCT01691781)
Timeframe: 1 week

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Primary Hyperparathyroidism70.9
Normal32.5

[back to top]

Length of Stay

(NCT01837069)
Timeframe: Hospital stay, ~7 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Treatment3
Control3

[back to top]

Number of Partipants That Experienced Death, Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack, Myocardial Necrosis, or Venous Thromboembolism

(NCT01837069)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment10
Control2

[back to top]

Acute Respiratory Distress (Dyspnea), Measured Using of the Maximum Score, at Any Time, of the Shortness of Breath Question (Item #4) on the LCSS (Worst Dyspnea Score)

"Acute respiratory distress (dyspnea), measured using of the maximum score, at any time, of the shortness of breath question (Item #4 How much shortness of breath do you have?) on the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) (Worst Dyspnea Score). The LCSS tool contains 6 major symptoms associated with lung malignancies and their effect on overall symptomatic distress, functional activities, and global quality of life (QOL). The item scale ranges from 0-10 (0 = None; 10 = As much as it could be) where the LCSS scoring algorithm is applied to convert to a 0-100 point scale where 100 is best quality of life (QOL), for comparability. Patient scores range from 0 to 100, where 100 was best QOL (i.e. less pulmonary distress)." (NCT01880528)
Timeframe: Up to 3 months post-radiation therapy

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm I (Lisinopril)77.5
Arm II (Placebo)42.0

[back to top]

Experience Shortness of Breath During Exercise as Measured Using Item #3 on the Symptom Experience Questionnaire (SEQ) at Week 4

"Experience shortness of breath during exercise as measured using Item #3 (Over the past week, did you experience shortness of breath when you exercise or exert yourself?) on the Symptom Experience Questionnaire (SEQ) at Baseline. The item scale ranges from 0-10 (0 = Not at all; 10 = As bad as it can be) where the SEQ scoring algorithm is applied to convert to a 0-100 point scale where 100 is best quality of life (QOL), for comparability." (NCT01880528)
Timeframe: At Week 4

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm I (Lisinopril)100
Arm II (Placebo)68.6

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Hypotension, Acute Kidney Injury, Allergic Reaction, or Anaphylaxis, as Measured Using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.0

Incidence of grade 3 or higher hypotension, acute kidney injury, allergic reaction, or anaphylaxis, as measured using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.0. Descriptive statistics of frequency (percentage) will be used to summarize adverse event (AE) incidence and severity in the lisinopril and placebo arms separately. (NCT01880528)
Timeframe: Up to 3 months post-radiation therapy

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm I (Lisinopril)0
Arm II (Placebo)0

[back to top]

Quality of Life (Dyspnea When Climbing Stairs) Assessed Using Item #5 of the European Organization for Research on the Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Module Survey (EORTC-QLQ-LC13) at Week 4

"Dyspnea when climbing as measured using item #5 (Were you short of breath when you climbed stairs?) of the EORTC-QLQ-LC13 at Week 4. The item scale ranges from 1-4 (1 = Not at all; 4 = Very Much) where the EORTC-QLQ-LC13 scoring algorithm is applied to convert to a 0-100 point scale where 100 is best quality of life (QOL), for comparability." (NCT01880528)
Timeframe: At Week 4

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm I (Lisinopril)83.3
Arm II (Placebo)51.9

[back to top]

Total LCSS Score as Measure by the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) at Week 4

Total LCSS score as measured using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) at Week 4. The item scale ranges from 0-10 (0 = None; 10 = As much as it could be) where the LCSS scoring algorithm is applied to convert to a 0-100 point scale where 100 is best quality of life (QOL), for comparability. (NCT01880528)
Timeframe: At Week 4

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm I (Lisinopril)83.8
Arm II (Placebo)66.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With 50% Reduction of Baseline eGFR, End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD, Initiation of Dialysis or Preemptive Transplant), or Death.

(NCT01885559)
Timeframe: Patients followed for 5-8 years with average of 6.5 years follow up

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ACE-I + Placebo116
ACE-I + ARB115

[back to top]

Quality of Life Mental Component Summary

Short Form-36 Quality of Life Mental Component Summary ranges from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome). Data from multiple years were analyzed with the primary focus on the change over time for the measure (from the slope for time from the model). The measure presented is the average annual change across the 8 years. (NCT01885559)
Timeframe: up to 8 years (annually assessed)

Interventionunits on a scale per year (Mean)
ACE-I + Placebo-0.031
ACE-I + ARB-0.079

[back to top]

Quality of Life Physical Component Summary

Short Form-36 Quality of Life Physical Component Summary ranges from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome). Data from multiple years were analyzed with the primary focus on the change over time for the measure (from the slope for time from the model). The measure presented is the average annual change across the 8 years. (NCT01885559)
Timeframe: up to 8 years (annually assessed)

Interventionunits on a scale per year (Mean)
ACE-I + Placebo-0.64
ACE-I + ARB-0.68

[back to top]

Albuminuria

Annual percent change in 24 hour urine albumin, centrally processed. Data from multiple years were analyzed with the primary focus on the change over time for the measure (from the slope of the model). The measure presented is the average annual percent change across the 8 years. (NCT01885559)
Timeframe: up to 8 years (annually assessed)

Interventionannual percent change (Mean)
ACE-I + Placebo7.5
ACE-I + ARB7.3

[back to top]

Aldosterone

Annual percent change in urinary aldosterone, centrally processed measure. Data from multiple years were analyzed with the primary focus on the change over time for the measure (from the slope for time from the model). The measure presented is the average annual percent change across the 8 years. (NCT01885559)
Timeframe: up at 8 years (annually assessed)

Interventionannual percent change (Mean)
ACE-I + Placebo-8.8
ACE-I + ARB-10.2

[back to top]

Back or Flank Pain

Report of back or flank pain since the last visit (yes or no) (NCT01885559)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionpercentage of participants at 48 months (Number)
ACE-I + Placebo43
ACE-I + ARB46

[back to top]

Cardiovascular Hospitalizations

Cause-specific hospitalizations (cardiovascular) (NCT01885559)
Timeframe: up to 8 years

Interventionevents (Number)
ACE-I + Placebo29
ACE-I + ARB16

[back to top]

Hospitalizations

Hospitalization for any cause (NCT01885559)
Timeframe: up to 8 years

Interventionevents (Number)
ACE-I + Placebo173
ACE-I + ARB136

[back to top]

Cardiac Ejection Fraction as Measured by Echocardiogram

Mean cardiac ejection fraction as measured by echocardiogram at 12 month study visit. Cardiac ejection fractions were measured using the biplane Simpson's rule using images obtained from the apical 4 chamber views of the heart. (NCT01982695)
Timeframe: 12 month visit

Interventionpercentage of blood leaving the heart (Mean)
Lisinopril54.6
Losartan55.2

[back to top]

Executive Function

Executive function will be assessed using Trail Making Test (part B-A). Part A was collected to correct for motor speed and visual-perceptual demands on TMT by subtracting completion time for TMT Part A from completion time for Part B (TMT B - A). TMT Part B-A provides a relatively purer measure of executive functioning. It has a timed scale from 0 sec (min) to 300 secs (max). Along this scale, a lower score is better. (NCT01984164)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionseconds (Least Squares Mean)
Candesartan87.23
Lisinopril111.37

[back to top]

Language

This will be measured using the Boston Naming Test. BNT is a neuropsychological test used to assess visual confrontation naming and language performance in participants with cognitive decline. Its short 15-item version consists of drawings of objects ranging from common objects to less familiar objects. Scale: 0 (min score) to 15 (max score). For this test, a higher score/response represents a better outcome. (NCT01984164)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionnumber of correct responses (Least Squares Mean)
Candesartan13.42
Lisinopril13.84

[back to top]

Memory

To assess episodic memory, the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) will be used. The retention (%) score is calculated by dividing the delayed recall trial by the higher of 3 learning trials. Each trial scores 0 (min) to 12 (max). The HVLT-R retention score is a percentage, and a higher percentage represents a better outcome. (NCT01984164)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of retention (Least Squares Mean)
Candesartan82.71
Lisinopril79.47

[back to top]

White Matter Lesion Volume

White Matter Lesion volume: high-resolution anatomical images are acquired for the measurement of microvascular disease. WMH volumes will be obtained from Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging sequence and reported as total volume (in mm3). Higher values means greater WMH (NCT01984164)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionmm^3 (Least Squares Mean)
Candesartan2.68
Lisinopril5.73

[back to top]

Cerebral Perfusion

ASL-MRI: Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) MRI is non-invasive measure of perfusion that does not require contrast, and allows multiple brain regions mapping of perfusion and reserve. ASL-MRI provides measures of cerebral blood flow (CBF). Higher values indicates higher CBF. (NCT01984164)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionml/100g/min (Least Squares Mean)
Candesartan45.48
Lisinopril47.65

[back to top]

"NINDS-initiated EXecutive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research or EXAMINER Tool Box."

"EXecutive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research or EXAMINER tool box. This test batteryThe battery includes 11 tasks that generate 15 primary variables. Within this set, the EXAMINER includes: working memory, inhibition, set shifting, and fluency. The parts of EXAMINER that were used for this study include: Flanker task (inhibition) which involves responding to a central stimulus while ignoring flanking stimuli that are either compatible or incompatible with the central stimulus; Set-shifting, a measure of mental flexibility; Spatial 1-Back test assesses spatial working memory; Dot Counting test assesses verbal working memory; Verbal Fluency tested using a List Generation test which require the participant to generate words beginning with a specific letter, and category fluency in which the participant generates words from a specified category (e.g., animals, fruits). Higher are reflective of better executive function (-1 to +1)" (NCT01984164)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Candesartan0.07
Lisinopril0.25

[back to top]

Attention Measured Using Digit Span Backward

The Digit Span test is a subtest of both the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Wechsler Memory Scales (WMS). For the digit span backwards, subjects are read a sequence of numbers and asked to repeat the same sequence back to the examiner in reverse order (backward span). Backward span is an executive task particularly dependent on working memory. The Digit Span backward is scored for backwards performance. Scale: 0 (minimum) to 16 (maximum). A higher score represents a better outcome. (NCT01984164)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionNumber of correct responses (Least Squares Mean)
Candesartan5.14
Lisinopril5.16

[back to top]

Attention Measured Using Digit Span Forward

This will be measured using Digit Span Forward. The Digit Span test is a subtest of both the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Wechsler Memory Scales (WMS). For the digit span forward, subjects are read a sequence of numbers and asked to repeat the same sequence back to the examiner in the correct order (forward span). Forward span captures attention efficiency and capacity. The Digit Span forward is scored for forwards performance. Scale: 0 (minimum) to 16 (maximum). A higher score represents a better outcome. (NCT01984164)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionNumber of correct responses (Least Squares Mean)
Candesartan9.67
Lisinopril8.93

[back to top]

The Magnitude of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Changes From Baseline Among the Subjects Who Reached Target at 2 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release, Alone

The duration of the combination therapy was 2 weeks. Blood pressure was measured at week 2 of the trial. (NCT02336607)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change of systolic blood pressureChange of diastolic blood pressure
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)-22.8-15.1
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+HydrochlorothiazideNANA
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Metoprolol Tablet (Betaloc ZOK)NANA
Felodipine Tablets (Plendil)+Lisinopril (Zestril)NANA

[back to top]

The Magnitude of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Changes From Baseline Among the Subjects Who Reached Target at 12 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.

The duration of the combination therapy was 12 weeks. Blood pressure was measured at week 14 of the trial. (NCT02336607)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change of systolic blood pressureChange of diastolic blood pressure
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)NANA
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Hydrochlorothiazide-18.2-12.2
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Metoprolol Tablet (Betaloc ZOK)-18.4-13.0
Felodipine Tablets (Plendil)+Lisinopril (Zestril)-20.3-13.6

[back to top]

The Magnitude of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Changes From Baseline Among the Subjects Who Reached Target After 8 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.

The duration of the combination therapy was 8 weeks. Blood pressure was measured at week 10 of the trial. (NCT02336607)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change of systolic blood pressureChange of diastolic blood pressure
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)NANA
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Hydrochlorothiazide-18.5-11.5
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Metoprolol Tablet (Betaloc ZOK)-19.4-13.4
Felodipine Tablets (Plendil)+Lisinopril (Zestril)-19.7-13.1

[back to top]

The Magnitude of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Changes From Baseline Among All Randomized Subjects After 8 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.

The duration of the combination therapy was 8 weeks. Blood pressure was measured at week 10 of the trial. (NCT02336607)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change of systolic blood pressureChange of diastolic blood pressure
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)NANA
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Hydrochlorothiazide-16.4-10.7
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Metoprolol Tablet (Betaloc ZOK)-17.8-11.3
Felodipine Tablets (Plendil)+Lisinopril (Zestril)-18.0-12.1

[back to top]

The Magnitude of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Changes From Baseline Among All Randomized Subjects After 12 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.

The duration of the combination therapy was 12 weeks. Blood pressure was measured at week 14 of the trial. (NCT02336607)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change of systolic blood pressureChange of diastolic blood pressure
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)NANA
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Hydrochlorothiazide-16.8-10.6
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Metoprolol Tablet (Betaloc ZOK)-16.6-10.7
Felodipine Tablets (Plendil)+Lisinopril (Zestril)-18.0-12.8

[back to top]

The Magnitude of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Change From Baseline Among All Randomized Subjects After 4 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.

The duration of the combination therapy was 4 weeks. Blood pressure was measured at week 6 of the trial. (NCT02336607)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change of systolic blood pressureChange of diastolic blood pressure
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)NANA
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Hydrochlorothiazide-9.8-6.0
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Metoprolol Tablet (Betaloc ZOK)-10.3-7.3
Felodipine Tablets (Plendil)+Lisinopril (Zestril)-13.4-9.9

[back to top]

The Change of Pulse Wave Velocity From Baseline at 2, 14 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release Alone.

The duration of the combination therapy was 12 weeks. The change of pulse wave velocity was measured at week 14 of the trial. (NCT02336607)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,,
Interventionm/s (Mean)
week 2week 14
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)-0.58-0.86
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+HydrochlorothiazideNANA
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Metoprolol Tablet (Betaloc ZOK)NANA
Felodipine Tablets (Plendil)+Lisinopril (Zestril)NANA

[back to top]

The Percentage of Subjects Reaching Blood Pressure Target (Defined as < 140 / 90 mmHg) After 8 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.

The duration of the combination therapy was 8 weeks. Blood pressure was measured at week 10 of the trial. (NCT02336607)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Metoprolol Tablet (Betaloc ZOK)78.6
Felodipine Tablets (Plendil)+Lisinopril (Zestril)79
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Hydrochlorothiazide78.7
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)NA

[back to top]

The Percentage of Subjects Reaching Blood Pressure Target (Defined as < 140 / 90 mmHg) After 4 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.

The duration of the combination therapy was 4 weeks. Blood pressure was measured at week 6 of the trial. (NCT02336607)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Metoprolol Tablet (Betaloc ZOK)45.8
Felodipine Tablets (Plendil)+Lisinopril (Zestril)59.5
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Hydrochlorothiazide46.2
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)NA

[back to top]

The Percentage of Subjects Reaching Blood Pressure Target (Defined as < 140 / 90 mmHg) After 14 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.

(NCT02336607)
Timeframe: 14 weeks

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Metoprolol Tablet (Betaloc ZOK)74.1
Felodipine Tablets (Plendil)+Lisinopril (Zestril)80.5
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Hydrochlorothiazide80.2
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)NA

[back to top]

The Change of Pulse Wave Velocity at 12 Weeks Compare With Baseline Data of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.

The duration of the combination therapy was 12 weeks. The change of pulse wave velocity was measured at week 14 of the trial. (NCT02336607)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionm/s (Mean)
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Metoprolol Tablet (Betaloc ZOK)-0.12
Felodipine Tablets (Plendil)+Lisinopril (Zestril)-0.44
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Hydrochlorothiazide-0.06
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)NA

[back to top]

The Magnitude of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Changes From Baseline Among the Subjects Who Reached Target at 4 Weeks of Felodipine Sustained Release in Combination With Metoprolol, Lisinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide.

The duration of the combination therapy was 4 weeks. Blood pressure was measured at week 6 of the trial. (NCT02336607)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change of systolic blood pressureChange of diastolic blood pressure
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)NANA
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Hydrochlorothiazide-16.4-8.2
Felodipine Tablet (Plendil)+Metoprolol Tablet (Betaloc ZOK)-16.1-12.3
Felodipine Tablets (Plendil)+Lisinopril (Zestril)-17.1-10.9

[back to top]

The Number of Patients for Whom Each Drug is Selected as the Preferred Therapy

For each n-of-1 trial, the preferred drug is defined as that which produces normal ambulatory blood pressure (by pediatric Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) standards), with the greatest magnitude of wake mean systolic BP reduction, and without unacceptable side effects. (NCT02412761)
Timeframe: The outcome of BP control and side effect tolerability will be assessed 2 weeks after starting each drug. Participants will be followed for an average of 10-12 weeks.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lisinopril16
Amlodipine8
Hydrochlorothiazide4

[back to top]

Response Rates at End of Double-blind Treatment Period Based on Trough Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure

"Participants had their blood pressure measured at the study site using the BpTRU® device. The BpTRU® is an automatic unattended office blood pressure measurement device. Six measurements, at rest, per participant per visit were performed. The mean of the last 5 measurements was used for the analysis.~A participant was a responder if the reduction from baseline in mean trough sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) was 10 mmHg or greater-than 10 mmHg." (NCT02603809)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and end of double-blind treatment (Day 56)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo21
Aprocitentan 5 mg21
Aprocitentan 10 mg34
Aprocitentan 25 mg40
Aprocitentan 50 mg38
Lisinopril 20 mg31

[back to top]

Ratio of Group Mean at Trough to Group Mean at Peak for Diastolic Blood Pressure Based on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM)

"Ratio of group mean at trough to group mean at peak was calculated from the diastolic ambulatory blood pressure monitoring performed over a 24-hour period with the ABPM device. The trough (the smallest blood pressure reduction) and the peak (the highest blood pressure reduction) ratio show the extent of blood pressure lowering throughout the 24-hour dosing interval in the group.~The group mean trough (at 20-24 hours) to group mean (at 2-6 hours) peak of diastolic blood pressure were examined to evaluate the extent to which once-daily dosing criteria were met (trough-to-peak values greater than 0.5).~The ratio is positive if there was a decrease in diastolic blood pressure at both the trough and peak times at the end of treatment (Day 55 to Day 56) when compared to baseline (Day -1 to Day 1).~For ambulatory blood pressure monitoring the baseline was the period from the time of last run-in placebo intake up to the time of the first double-blind treatment intake." (NCT02603809)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1 to Day 1) and end of double-blind treatment (Day 55 and Day 56)

InterventionRatio of mean at trough to mean at peak (Number)
Placebo-48.03
Aprocitentan 5 mg2.59
Aprocitentan 10 mg0.90
Aprocitentan 25 mg1.49
Aprocitentan 50 mg1.25
Lisinopril 20 mg0.65

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to End of Double-blind Treatment in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Trough

"Participants had their blood pressure measured at the study site using the BpTRU® device. The BpTRU® is an automatic unattended office blood pressure measurement device. Six measurements, at rest, per participant per visit were performed. The mean of the last 5 measurements was used for the analysis.~The absolute change in mean trough sitting systolic blood pressure (SiSBP) measured by from baseline (i.e., at randomization) to week 8 (Day 56). A negative change indicates a decrease in the systolic blood pressure from the start of treatment." (NCT02603809)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and end of double-blind treatment (Day 56)

,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineAbsolute Change from Baseline to Week 8
Aprocitentan 10 mg149.8-15.0
Aprocitentan 25 mg151.2-18.5
Aprocitentan 5 mg149.4-10.3
Aprocitentan 50 mg148.6-15.1
Lisinopril 20 mg149.8-12.8
Placebo149.2-7.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to End of Double-blind Treatment in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Trough

"Participants had their blood pressure measured at the study site using the BpTRU® device. The BpTRU® is an automatic unattended office blood pressure measurement device. Six measurements, at rest, per participant per visit were performed. The mean of the last 5 measurements was used for the analysis.~The absolute change in mean trough sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) measured by from baseline (i.e., at randomization) to week 8 (Day 56). A negative change indicates a decrease in the diastolic blood pressure from the start of treatment." (NCT02603809)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and end of double-blind treatment (Day 56)

,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineAbsolute Change from Baseline to Week 8
Aprocitentan 10 mg97.7-9.9
Aprocitentan 25 mg97.8-12.0
Aprocitentan 5 mg97.8-6.3
Aprocitentan 50 mg98.2-10.0
Lisinopril 20 mg96.8-8.4
Placebo97.5-4.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to End of Double-blind Treatment in 24-hour Diastolic and Systolic Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM)

"Diastolic and systolic ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed over a 24-hour period with the ABPM device (Mobil-o-Graph) set to record diastolic and systolic blood pressure at a pre-defined time. Over a 24-hour period 3 measurements per hour during the day and 2 per hour during the night were made. The blood pressure measurements were derived from the area under the diastolic and systolic blood pressure curves and divided by the time span and averaged.~For ambulatory blood pressure monitoring the baseline was the period from the time of last run-in placebo intake up to the time of the first double-blind treatment intake." (NCT02603809)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1 to Day 1) and end of double-blind treatment (Day 55 and Day 56)

,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline 24-hour mean DBPAbsolute change in 24-hour mean DBP at Week 8Baseline 24-hour mean SBPAbsolute change in 24-hour mean SBP at Week 8
Aprocitentan 10 mg92.60-6.55144.30-7.72
Aprocitentan 25 mg89.28-8.86140.83-9.23
Aprocitentan 5 mg90.60-3.76139.90-3.16
Aprocitentan 50 mg91.53-5.98141.28-6.07
Lisinopril 20 mg91.18-5.72143.35-7.23
Placebo90.46-2.49140.28-3.54

[back to top]

Response Rates at End of Double-blind Treatment Period Based on Trough Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure

"Participants had their blood pressure measured at the study site using the BpTRU® device. The BpTRU® is an automatic unattended office blood pressure measurement device. Six measurements, at rest, per participant per visit were performed. The mean of the last 5 measurements was used for the analysis.~A participant was a responder if the reduction from baseline in mean trough sitting systolic blood pressure (SiSBP) was 20 mmHg or greater-than 20 mmHg." (NCT02603809)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and end of double-blind treatment (Day 56)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo16
Aprocitentan 5 mg16
Aprocitentan 10 mg22
Aprocitentan 25 mg28
Aprocitentan 50 mg22
Lisinopril 20 mg20

[back to top]

Control Rates at the End of the Double-blind Treatment Period Based on Trough Sitting Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure

"Participants had their blood pressure measured at the study site using the BpTRU® device. The BpTRU® is an automatic unattended office blood pressure measurement device. Six measurements, at rest, per participant per visit were performed. The mean of the last 5 measurements was used for the analysis. The Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP) issued guidelines proposing cut-offs of 85 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure and 135 mmHg for systolic blood pressure specifically focusing on measurement by automated office blood pressure measurement. The number of participants at the end of the 8-week treatment period that had values below the protocol and CHEP cut-off values are reported.~The initial protocol control rates at Week 8 (Day 56) on trough SiDBP are also reported and were defined as a SiDBP of less than 90 mmHg and a SiSBP of less than 140 mmHg." (NCT02603809)
Timeframe: End of double-blind treatment (Day 56)

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SiDBP less than 90 mmHgSiDBP less than 85 mmHg (CHEP)SiSBP less than 140 mmHgSiSBP less than 135 mmHg (CHEP)
Aprocitentan 10 mg37294332
Aprocitentan 25 mg43294438
Aprocitentan 5 mg30153727
Aprocitentan 50 mg39214736
Lisinopril 20 mg38233931
Placebo22173424

[back to top]

Supportive Analysis of Primary Endpoint: Change From Baseline to End of Double-blind Treatment in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Trough

"Participants had their blood pressure measured at the study site using the BpTRU® device. The BpTRU® is an automatic unattended office blood pressure measurement device. Six measurements, at rest, per participant per visit were performed. The mean of the last 5 measurements was used for the analysis.~The absolute change in mean trough sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) measured by from baseline (i.e., at randomization) to week 8 (Day 56). A negative change indicates a decrease in the diastolic blood pressure from the start of treatment." (NCT02603809)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1 to Day 1) and end of double-blind treatment (Day 55 and Day 56)

,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineAbsolute Change from Baseline to Week 8
Aprocitentan 10 mg97.7-9.9
Aprocitentan 25 mg98.2-11.7
Aprocitentan 5 mg97.5-5.8
Aprocitentan 50 mg98.4-9.9
Lisinopril 20 mg96.9-8.2
Placebo98.0-4.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Self-reported Adherence to Intervention

Adherence is reported as the number of participants who self-reported at the 6-month visit that they had not missed any doses of their medication in the preceding month. (NCT03461003)
Timeframe: from month 5 to month 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NICHE Method5
Usual Care6

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction With Intervention as Assessed by a Survey

Patient satisfaction is scored from 0 to 10, where 0 is the worst health care possible and 10 is the best health care possible. (NCT03461003)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
NICHE Method9.929
Usual Care9.667

[back to top]

Change in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure

To assess 24-hour mean ambulatory blood pressure, participants wear a 24-hour blood pressure monitor, which records blood pressure at regular intervals throughout a 24-hour period, while awake and while asleep. The mean of all recordings over the 24-hour period is calculated per participant for both baseline and 6 months, and then the mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure at 6 months minus the mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure at baseline is calculated per participant. The average difference is reported, with a negative value indicating a reduction in blood pressure over time. (NCT03461003)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
NICHE Method-10.6
Usual Care-5.1

[back to top]

Change in Mean Wake Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure

To assess mean wake ambulatory blood pressure, participants wear a 24-hour blood pressure monitor, which records blood pressure at regular intervals throughout a 24 hour period, throughout wake and sleep. The mean of all recordings that occur while the participant is awake during the 24-hour period is calculated for both baseline and 6 months, and then the mean wake systolic blood pressure at 6 months minus the mean wake systolic blood pressure at baseline is calculated per participant. The average difference is reported, with a negative value indicating a reduction in blood pressure over time. (NCT03461003)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
NICHE Method-10.5
Usual Care-6.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Reported That Side Effects From Medication Led Them to Discontinue Medication

(NCT03461003)
Timeframe: from baseline to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NICHE Method0
Usual Care3

[back to top]