Page last updated: 2024-12-06

simvastatin

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Simvastatin is a synthetic statin, a class of drugs that lower cholesterol levels in the blood. It is used to prevent coronary heart disease, and reduce the risk of stroke and heart attack. Simvastatin inhibits the enzyme HMG-CoA reductase, which is involved in the synthesis of cholesterol. This inhibits the production of cholesterol in the liver, leading to a decrease in blood cholesterol levels. It is widely studied for its potential to lower cholesterol levels and its impact on cardiovascular health. Simvastatin is also being investigated for potential use in treating other conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease, cancer, and inflammatory bowel disease.'

Simvastatin: A derivative of LOVASTATIN and potent competitive inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COA REDUCTASES), which is the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis. It may also interfere with steroid hormone production. Due to the induction of hepatic LDL RECEPTORS, it increases breakdown of LDL CHOLESTEROL. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

simvastatin : A member of the class of hexahydronaphthalenes that is lovastatin in which the 2-methylbutyrate ester moiety has been replaced by a 2,2-dimethylbutyrate ester group. It is used as a cholesterol-lowering and anti-cardiovascular disease drug. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID54454
CHEMBL ID1064
CHEBI ID9150
SCHEMBL ID2471
MeSH IDM0029425

Synonyms (221)

Synonym
BIDD:GT0769
CHEMBL1064
nsc-758706
c10aa01
MLS002154038
AB00053395-08
BRD-K22134346-001-05-8
gtpl2955
AKOS015842733
nsc633782
79902-63-9
mk-733
simvastatin
synvinolin
zocor
(1s,7s,8s,8ar)-8-{2-[(2r,4r)-4-hydroxy-6-oxooxan-2-yl]ethyl}-3,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl 2,2-dimethylbutanoate
nsc-633782
DIVK1C_006991
lipovas
simvastatina
simvastatinum
zocord
simvast cr
simvastatine
(1s,3r,7s,8s,8ar)-8-{2-[(2r,4r)-4-hydroxy-6-oxotetrahydro-2h-pyran-2-yl]ethyl}-3,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl 2,2-dimethylbutanoate
CHEBI:9150 ,
simvastatin, >=97% (hplc), solid
nivelipol
sivastin
ccris 7558
lipex
simovil
simvastatina [spanish]
pantok
simvastatinum [latin]
drg-0320
sinvacor
lodales
butanoic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-, 1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,7-dimethyl-8-(2-(tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-6-oxo-2h-pyran-2-yl)ethyl)-1-naphthalenyl ester, (1s-(1alpha,3alpha,7beta,8beta(2s*,4s*),8abeta))-
l 644128-000u
rendapid
brn 4768037
corolin
SPECTRUM_001717
hsdb 7208
medipo
2,2-dimethylbutyric acid, 8-ester with (4r,6r)-6-(2-((1s,2s,6r,8s,8ar)-1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-8-hydroxy-2,6-dimethyl-1-naphthyl)ethyl)tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-2h-pyran-2-one
vasotenal
coledis
denan
mk-0733
mk 0733
butanoic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-, (1s,3r,7s,8s,8ar)-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,7-dimethyl-8-(2-((2r,4r)-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-6-oxo-2h-pyran-2-yl)ethyl)-1-naphthalenyl ester
labistatin
cholestat
colemin
simvastatine [french]
SPECTRUM5_001428
PRESTWICK_171
cas-79902-63-9
NCGC00016940-01
NCGC00017324-01
tnp00259
BSPBIO_000909
PRESTWICK2_000865
BSPBIO_002337
BPBIO1_001001
BCBCMAP01_000007
MLS001333078
MLS001333077
[(1s,3r,7s,8s,8ar)-8-[2-[(2r,4r)-4-hydroxy-6-oxo-tetrahydropyran-2-yl]ethyl]-3,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl] 2,2-dimethylbutanoate
butanoic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-, (1s,3r,7s,8s,8ar)-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,7-dimethyl-8-[2-[(2r,4r)-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-6-oxo-2h-pyran-2-yl]ethyl]-1-naphthalenyl ester
2,2-dimethylbutanoic acid (1s,3r,7s,8s,8ar)-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,7-dimethyl-8-[2-[(2r,4r)-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-6-oxo-2h-pyran-2-yl]ethyl]-1-naphthalenyl ester
DB00641
D00434
zocor (tn)
simvastatin (jp17/usp/inn)
PRESTWICK3_000865
KBIOGR_001244
KBIO3_001557
KBIO1_001935
KBIO2_002197
KBIO2_004765
KBIO2_007333
KBIOSS_002197
SPECTRUM3_000669
PRESTWICK1_000865
PRESTWICK0_000865
SPECTRUM2_001671
SPECTRUM4_000632
SPBIO_001881
SPBIO_002830
SPECPLUS_000895
SPECTRUM1504236
smr000718785
NCGC00017324-03
MLS001304029
NCGC00017324-02
mk733
mk 733
simvastatin & primycin
AC-1530
HMS2089D12
HMS2093E06
S0509
bdbm50139181
simvastatin lactone
AKOS005111006
inchi=1/c25h38o5/c1-6-25(4,5)24(28)30-21-12-15(2)11-17-8-7-16(3)20(23(17)21)10-9-19-13-18(26)14-22(27)29-19/h7-8,11,15-16,18-21,23,26h,6,9-10,12-14h2,1-5h3/t15-,16-,18+,19+,20-,21-,23-/m0/s1
rymzzmvnjrmudd-hgqwonqesa-
HMS1570N11
HMS1922H13
[(1s,3r,7s,8s,8ar)-8-[2-[(2r,4r)-4-hydroxy-6-oxooxan-2-yl]ethyl]-3,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl] 2,2-dimethylbutanoate
STK801938
A839783
HMS2097N11
HMS3259B12
inactive simvastatin
simvastatin predrug
velostatin
agg2fn16ev ,
nsc 758706
zorced
zosta
unii-agg2fn16ev
rechol
simvastatin [usan:usp:inn:ban]
tox21_300400
NCGC00254418-01
nsc758706
pharmakon1600-01504236
dtxcid103581
dtxsid0023581 ,
tox21_110696
HMS2231N22
CCG-39069
NCGC00017324-05
NCGC00017324-04
simvoget
simlup
simcard
simvacor
NCGC00017324-08
simvastatin [mi]
butanoic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-, 1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,7-dimethyl-8-(2-(tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-6-oxo-2h-pyran-2-yl)ethyl)-1-naphthalenyl ester, (1s-(1.alpha.,3.alpha.,7.beta.,8.beta.(2s*,4s*),8a.beta.))-
vytorin component simvastatin
simvastatin [ep monograph]
simvastatin [vandf]
simvastatin [orange book]
simvastatin [jan]
simvastatin [usp monograph]
simcor component simvastatin
simvastatin [mart.]
simvastatin [inn]
simvastatin [hsdb]
2,2-dimethylbutyric acid, 8-ester with (4r,6r)-6-[2-[(1s,2s,6r,8s,8ar)-1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-8-hydroxy-2,6-dimethyl-1-naphthyl]ethyl]tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-2h-pyran-2-one
simvastatin [usan]
simvastatin component of vytorin
simvastatin [who-dd]
simvastatin [usp-rs]
simvastatin component of simcor
S1792
BRD-K22134346-001-15-7
BBL024390
AB00053395-10
HY-17502
NC00719
SCHEMBL2471
NCGC00017324-07
tox21_110696_1
KS-1113 ,
AB00053395-07
MLS006011866
(1s,3r,7s,8s,8ar)-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,7-dimethyl-8-[2-[(2r,4r)-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-6-oxo-2h-pyran-2-yl]ethyl]-1-naphthalenyly-2,2-dimethyl butanoate
(1s,3r,7s,8s,8ar)-8-(2-((2r,4r)-4-hydroxy-6-oxotetrahydro-2h-pyran-2-yl)ethyl)-3,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl 2,2-dimethylbutanoate
simvastatin (zocor) ,
simvastatin, british pharmacopoeia (bp) reference standard
(1s,3r,7s,8s,8ar)-8-(2-((2r,4r)-4-hydroxy-6-oxotetrahydro-2h-pyran-2-yl)ethyl)-3,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl 2,2-dimethylbu
AB00053395_11
AB00053395_13
sr-05000001894
SR-05000001894-1
simvastatin, analytical standard
simvastatin, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
simvotin
sinvascor
valemia
modutrol
nor-vastina
(+)-simvastatin
lipinorm
eucor
SR-05000001894-2
simvastatin for peak identification, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
simvastatin, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
simvastatin, pharmaceutical secondary standard; certified reference material
SBI-0206773.P001
MRF-0000729
HMS3714N11
HMS3676P08
simvastatin,(s)
kolestevan
HMS3412P08
Q670131
BRD-K22134346-001-11-6
EN300-52503
HMS3884G10
simvastatin 100 microg/ml in acetonitrile
NCGC00017324-09
BS164407
simvastatin- bio-x
simvastatin (usan:usp:inn:ban)
simvastatin (mart.)
flolipid
simvastatin (usp monograph)
simvastatin (usp-rs)
(1s,3r,7s,8s,8ar)-8-(2-((2r,4r)-4-hydroxy-6-oxotetrahydro-2h-pyran-2-yl)ethyl)-3,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl 2,2-dimethylbutanoate
simvastatin (ep monograph)
(1s-(1alpha,3alpha,7beta,8beta(2s*,4s*),8abeta))-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,7-dimethyl-8-(2-(tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-6-oxo-2h-pyran-2-yl)ethyl)-1-naphthalenyl 2,2-dimethylbutanoate
simvastatinum (latin)
Z754918914

Research Excerpts

Overview

Simvastatin (SV) is a common hypolipidemic drug in clinical medicine. It can reduce cholesterol biosynthesis by inhibiting hydroxyl-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase. Previous in vitro and in vivo reports showed that it may have therapeutic effects in treating leiomyomas.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Simvastatin (SV) is a common hypolipidemic drug in clinical medicine that can reduce endogenous cholesterol biosynthesis by inhibiting hydroxyl-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase. "( Simvastatin affects the PPARα signaling pathway and causes oxidative stress and embryonic development interference in Mugilogobius abei.
Li, K; Nie, X; Tang, T; Wang, C; Wang, Y, 2021
)
3.51
"Simvastatin is an antihyperlipidemic drug, and previous in vitro and in vivo reports showed that it may have therapeutic effects in treating leiomyomas."( Simvastatin Inhibits Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway in Uterine Leiomyoma.
Afrin, S; Borahay, MA; El Sabeh, M; Saha, SK, 2021
)
2.79
"Simvastatin serves as an effective therapeutic potential in the treatment of dental disease via alternating proliferation of dental pulp stem cells. "( Simvastatin treatment promotes proliferation of human dental pulp stem cells via modulating PI3K/AKT/miR-9/KLF5 signalling pathway.
He, DE; Wang, JH, 2021
)
3.51
"Simvastatin (SV) is a hypolipidemic agent, and it is the 2nd most widely prescribed lipid-lowering drug. "( Detection and characterization of simvastatin and its metabolites in rat tissues and biological fluids using MALDI high resolution mass spectrometry approach.
Al-Wabli, RI; Attwa, MW; Kadi, AA; Rahman, AFMM; Yin, W, 2022
)
2.44
"Simvastatin is an antioxidant with lipid-lowering effects, which is commonly used to treat CHF."( Simvastatin Combined with Resistance Training Improves Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure by Modulating Mitochondrial Membrane Potential and the Janus Kinase/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 Signaling Pathways.
Wang, J; Wang, X; Wen, C; Yan, K, 2022
)
2.89
"Simvastatin is a prodrug of the potent 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. "( Effect of simvastatin on osteogenesis of the extremity bones in aging rats.
Chen, S; Li, H; Liu, M; Tang, J; Wang, M; Xi, Y, 2023
)
2.76
"Simvastatin is an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase and has been found to have protective effects against several bacterial infections. "( Simvastatin Inhibits
Huy, TXN; Kim, H; Kim, S; Lee, H; Lee, J; Min, W; Nguyen, TT; Reyes, AWB, 2022
)
3.61
"Simvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering drug known for its endothelial cell pleiotropic properties."( Association between single nucleotide polymorphism SLCO1B1 gene and simvastatin pleiotropic effects measured through flow-mediated dilation endothelial function parameters.
Ardiana, M; Dewi, IP; Kusuma Wardhani, LF; Nugraha, RA; Puspitasari, M; Shonafi, KA,
)
1.09
"Simvastatin is a well-known safe cholesterol-lowering medication that has been recently shown to suppress cancer progression."( Simvastatin Induces Apoptosis And Suppresses Hepatocellular Carcinoma Induced In Rats.
Amin, MN; El-Gayar, AM; Elleithi, YA, 2023
)
3.07
"Simvastatin (SMV) is a poorly soluble oral cholesterol-lowering drug that may aid diabetic wound healing."( Simvastatin-Releasing Nanofibrous Peptide Hydrogels for Accelerated Healing of Diabetic Wounds.
Abolmaali, SS; Azarpira, N; Heidari, R; Janipour, Z; Najafi, H; Özyılmaz, ED; Tamaddon, AM, 2023
)
3.07
"Simvastatin is a type of statins with anti-cancer activity, but its effect on colon cancer cells remains unclear."( Simvastatin induces pyroptosis via ROS/caspase-1/GSDMD pathway in colon cancer.
Liu, Y; Long, Y; Peng, M; Xie, W; Yi, L; Zhang, B, 2023
)
3.07
"Simvastatin is a lipid‑lowering drug, which is commonly used to prevent or treat risk factors of cardiovascular diseases with a significant anti‑atherogenic effect."( Simvastatin promotes endothelial dysfunction by activating the Wnt/β‑catenin pathway under oxidative stress.
Du, X; He, Z; Hua, L; Wan, L; Wu, Y; Yan, N, 2019
)
2.68
"Simvastatin is a semi-synthetic, highly lipophilic statin, and has several side effects."( Differential effects of simvastatin on membrane organization and dynamics in varying phases.
Chattopadhyay, A; Sahu, SS; Sarkar, P; Shrivastava, S, 2019
)
1.54
"Simvastatin is an anti-hyperlipidemic drug which reduces the cholesterol synthesis and also has anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and anti-microbial action against the bacteria. "( Effectiveness of Simvastatin 1% oral gel and mouthwash used as an adjunct treatment of scaling and root planning in the treatment of periodontal diseases.
Asadullah, K; Hasan, F; Iftakhar, K; Ikram, R; Simjee, SU, 2019
)
2.3
"Simvastatin (Sim) is a cholesterol-lowering drug and has been reported to inhibit tumor growth."( Simvastatin re-sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to sorafenib by inhibiting HIF-1α/PPAR-γ/PKM2-mediated glycolysis.
Chen, K; Dai, W; Feng, J; Guo, C; Ji, J; Kong, R; Li, J; Li, S; Mao, Y; Mo, W; Wu, J; Wu, L; Xu, X; Yu, Q; Zhang, J, 2020
)
2.72
"Simvastatin appears to be a promising therapeutic strategy in this setting."( Erythrocyte-derived microvesicles induce arterial spasms in JAK2V617F myeloproliferative neoplasm.
Blanc-Brude, O; Boulanger, CM; Camara, F; Dagher, T; Davy, H; Devue, C; Dingli, F; El Mdawar, MB; Hatem, SN; James, C; Kheloufi, M; Lasselin, J; Loew, D; Merchant, S; Mougenot, N; Plessier, A; Poisson, J; Rautou, PE; Souyri, M; Tanguy, M; Villeval, JL, 2020
)
1.28
"Simvastatin is a lipophilic statin that can enhance klotho expression."( The neuroprotective effect of simvastatin on the cerebellum of experimentally-induced diabetic rats through klotho upregulation: An immunohistochemical study.
Abd-Elhady, SL; El-Shahat, MA; Morsy, AI; Shams, AM; Youssef, OM, 2020
)
1.57
"Simvastatin (SIM) is a commonly used cholesterol-lowering drug that can reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events. "( A safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic study of a novel simvastatin silica-lipid hybrid formulation in healthy male participants.
Abuhelwa, AY; Clifton, P; Joyce, P; Meola, TR; Prestidge, CA, 2021
)
2.31
"Simvastatin is a translational drug that may be used to induce local bone formation. "( Osteogenic effects in a rat osteoporosis model and femur defect model by simvastatin microcrystals.
Jia, J; Leng, H; Song, C; Wang, H; Wu, C; Xu, Y; Zhang, C; Zhang, Q; Zhu, J, 2021
)
2.3
"Simvastatin (SV) is a typical lipid-lowering agent detected widely in waters, so its latent toxic effects to fish are deserved of concern. "( Simvastatin affects Nrf2/MAPK signaling pathway and hepatic histological structure change in Gambusia affinis.
Bao, S; Lin, J; Nie, X; Wang, C; Xie, M, 2021
)
3.51
"Simvastatin, which acts as an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA), is widely used to manage cardiovascular diseases."( Simvastatin attenuates spatial memory impairment via inhibiting microgliosis and apoptotic cell death against ethanol induced neurotoxicity in the developing rat hippocampus.
Hojati, V; Jafari, M; Khaksari, M; Vaezi, G, 2021
)
2.79
"Simvastatin is an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (CoA) reductase (HMGCR), the rate-limiting enzyme of the mevalonate (MVA) pathway for the cholesterol biosynthesis."( Targeting cholesterol biosynthesis promotes anti-tumor immunity by inhibiting long noncoding RNA SNHG29-mediated YAP activation.
Che, L; Huo, J; Li, J; Li, Y; Liu, Y; Mo, H; Ni, W; Qin, C; Xu, Y; Yao, S; Zhou, A; Zhou, R; Zhou, Y, 2021
)
1.34
"Simvastatin is a hypolipidemic drug that inhibits hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase to control elevated cholesterol, or hypercholesterolemia. "( Simvastatin prevents lipopolysaccharide-induced septic shock in rats.
Da, XW; He, AD; Long, D; Wu, XL; Yu, L, 2017
)
3.34
"Simvastatin is an important lipid-lowering agent with anti-inflammatory activity."( Anti-inflammatory effects of simvastatin in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-induced small bowel injury.
Cho, JH; Chung, JW; Jeong, AR; Kim, EJ; Kim, EK; Kim, JH; Kim, KO; Kim, YJ; Kwon, KA; Park, DK, 2017
)
1.47
"Simvastatin is a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor widely used to lower plasma cholesterol and to protect against cardiovascular risk factors. "( Simvastatin ameliorates ionizing radiation-induced apoptosis in the thymus by activating the AKT/sirtuin 1 pathway in mice.
Huang, F; Liao, L; Tao, X; Tao, Y; Yang, H; Zhao, X, 2017
)
3.34
"Simvastatin is a promising new drug for the treatment of endometriosis. "( Effect of simvastatin on monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression in endometriosis patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Pumipichet, S; Rattanasiri, S; Sophonsritsuk, A; Waiyaput, W; Weerakiet, S, 2017
)
2.3
"Simvastatin is a drug commonly used to reduce the cholesterol level. "( Influence of simvastatin on red blood cell line in porcine bone marrow.
Babińska, I; Gonkowski, S; Otrocka-Domagała, I; Pomianowski, A; Rytel, L; Snarska, A; Sobiech, P; Wysocka, D; Żarczyńska, K, 2017
)
2.27
"Simvastatin is a cholesterol-lowing reagent that is derived synthetically from the fermentation of Aspergillus terreus. "( Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF-4) plays a crucial role in simvastatin (SVT)-induced differentiation of rabbit articular chondrocytes.
Kim, SJ; Yu, SM, 2018
)
2.17
"Simvastatin (Sim) is a widely known drug in the treatment of hyperlipidemia, which has attracted so much attention in bone regeneration due to its potential osteoanabolic effect. "( Preparation of emulsifying wax/glyceryl monooleate nanoparticles and evaluation as a delivery system for repurposing simvastatin in bone regeneration.
Czech, T; Eskinazi-Budge, A; Kunzler, J; Manickavasagam, D; Novak, K; Oyewumi, MO, 2018
)
2.13
"Simvastatin is a statins that is able to competitively inhibit the activity of 3‑hydroxy‑3‑methylglutaryl‑coenzyme A reductase."( Low‑frequency ultrasound and microbubbles combined with simvastatin promote the apoptosis of MCF‑7 cells by affecting the LATS1/YAP/RHAMM pathway.
Chen, C; Li, H; Wang, D, 2018
)
1.45
"Simvastatin is a semisynthetic cholesterol-lowering medication and one of the top-selling statins in the world. "( Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of simvastatin.
Bond, CM; Tang, Y, 2019
)
2.2
"Simvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering drug that is prescribed to lower the risk of cardiovascular disease following high levels of blood cholesterol. "( Coenzyme Q10 does not improve peripheral insulin sensitivity in statin-treated men and women: the LIFESTAT study.
Dela, F; Dohlmann, TL; Hansen, M; Helge, JW; Kelly, B; Kuhlman, AB; Morville, T, 2019
)
1.96
"Simvastatin (SIM), which is a lipid-lowering agent is known to have an anabolic effect on bone."( Simvastatin attenuates tibial bone loss in rats with type 1 diabetes and periodontitis.
Bak, EJ; Cha, JH; Kim, A; Kim, AR; Kim, JH; Sohn, Y; Yoo, YJ, 2018
)
2.64
"Simvastatin (Svt) is a classic lipid-lowering drug that is widely used in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia, while berberine chloride (Bbr) is a novel hypolipidemic agent and its blood-lipid-reducing mechanism is distinct from traditional drugs."( Pharmacokinetic interactions and tolerability of berberine chloride with simvastatin and fenofibrate: an open-label, randomized, parallel study in healthy Chinese subjects.
Li, G; Qiu, F; Sun, Y; Zhao, L; Zhao, M, 2019
)
1.47
"Simvastatin is a lipid-lowering drug in the pharmaceutical group statins. "( Interaction of the cholesterol reducing agent simvastatin with zwitterionic DPPC and charged DPPG phospholipid membranes.
Koçak, M; Kucuk Baloglu, F; Sariisik, E; Severcan, F, 2019
)
2.21
"Simvastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitor with multiple targets and effects. "( Simvastatin protects photoreceptors from oxidative stress induced by all-trans-retinal, through the up-regulation of interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein.
Bahrami, B; Gillies, M; Murray, M; Shen, W; Wang, K; Wang, Y; Yao, W; Zeng, S; Zhang, T; Zhou, F; Zhu, L; Zhu, M, 2019
)
3.4
"Simvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering drug via inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase, thereby inhibiting protein prenylation."( Simvastatin enhances chemotherapy in cervical cancer via inhibition of multiple prenylation-dependent GTPases-regulated pathways.
Ma, L; Pan, Q; Xu, J, 2020
)
2.72
"Simvastatin (SIM) is a widely used anticholesterolemic drug that blocks the biosynthesis of cholesterol. "( Effect of simvastatin on bovine intramuscular and subcutaneous adipocytes proliferation and gene expression
Jin, Q; Liu, GF; Tan, XW; Wan, FC; Wei, C; Zhao, HB, 2020
)
2.4
"Simvastatin is an inhibitor of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase used for decreasing low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol in patients. "( Insulin prevents and reverts simvastatin-induced toxicity in C2C12 skeletal muscle cells.
Bouitbir, J; Krähenbühl, S; Sanvee, GM, 2019
)
2.25
"Simvastatin is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor that exerts pleiotropic effects beyond simple low-density lipoprotein lowering and has a similar impact on the differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells."( In vitro Differentiation of Hair Follicle Stem Cell into Keratinocyte by Simvastatin
Babakhani, A; Hashemi, P; Mohajer Ansari, J; Nobakht, M; Ramhormozi, P, 2019
)
1.47
"Simvastatin is a widely used cholesterol-adjusting drug that selectively inhibits the 3-hyrdoxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, leading to decreased cholesterol biosynthesis. "( Simvastatin downregulates HER2 via upregulation of PEA3 to induce cell death in HER2-positive breast cancer cells.
Cao, X; Pan, Y; Sha, S; Zhang, T; Zhao, T; Zhao, Z, 2012
)
3.26
"Simvastatin is a hypolipidemic drug used in atherosclerosis. "( Application of design of experiments to optimizing novel gastroretentive drug delivery of simvastatin.
Chabukswar, A; Jagdale, S; Kuchekar, B; Kurhe, P, 2013
)
2.05
"Simvastatin (SMV) is a specific competitive inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase. "( Simvastatin local drug delivery in smokers with chronic periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Bajaj, P; Kumari, M; Naik, SB; Pradeep, AR; Rao, NS, 2013
)
3.28
"Simvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering drug which exhibits numerous pleiotropic effects including anti-cancer activity. "( Simvastatin induces caspase-dependent apoptosis and activates P53 in OCM-1 cells.
Li, YX; Wang, Y; Wu, YZ; Xu, SL; Xu, WJ; Yang, HY; Zhao, MS, 2013
)
3.28
"Simvastatin (SV) is a widely used drug for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia in humans. "( Thermal stability of simvastatin under different atmospheres.
Bernardes, CE; Cordeiro, C; Dias, A; Diogo, HP; Minas Da Piedade, ME; Oliveira, MC; Simões, RG, 2014
)
2.16
"Simvastatin is an important regulator on NADPH subunits mRNA expressions and p47(phox)/p22(phox) interaction. "( [Simvastatin attenuates oxidized low density lipoprotein induced oxidative stress in human umbilical vein endothelial cells via downregulating NADPH oxidase activity].
Cui, L; Guo, R; Zhang, L, 2014
)
2.76
"Simvastatin (SMV) is a cholesterol-lowering drug that directly inhibits HMG-CoA reductase."( Simvastatin and dipentyl phthalate lower ex vivo testicular testosterone production and exhibit additive effects on testicular testosterone and gene expression via distinct mechanistic pathways in the fetal rat.
Beverly, BE; Foster, PM; Furr, JR; Gray, LE; Lambright, CS; McIntyre, BS; Sampson, H; Travlos, G; Wilson, VS, 2014
)
2.57
"Simvastatin is a drug with demonstrated anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects in many tissues but had not previously been studied in the context of rotator cuff tears."( Simvastatin reduces fibrosis and protects against muscle weakness after massive rotator cuff tear.
Bedi, A; Davis, ME; Gumucio, JP; Harning, JA; Korn, MA; Mendias, CL; Saripalli, AL, 2015
)
2.58
"Simvastatin is a statin with pleiotropic effects that can also act as an anti-oxidant agent, and these pharmacologic properties may contribute to its potential anti-cancer activity."( Effects of simvastatin on cell viability and proinflammatory pathways in lung adenocarcinoma cells exposed to hydrogen peroxide.
D'Agostino, B; Falcone, D; Gallelli, L; Maselli, R; Mesuraca, M; Navarra, M; Pelaia, G; Savino, R; Scaramuzzino, M; Spaziano, G; Terracciano, R, 2014
)
1.51
"Simvastatin (SIM) is a lipophilic statin that has potential benefits for prevention and treatment of several types of malignancies. "( Optimizing long-circulating liposomes for delivery of simvastatin to C26 colon carcinoma cells.
Achim, M; Alupei, MC; Banciu, M; Licarete, E; Luca, L; Muntean, D; Porfire, A; Tomuta, I; Vlase, L, 2015
)
2.11
"Simvastatin potassium is a hypolipidemic drug used with exercise, diet, and weight-loss to control elevated cholesterol, or hypercholesterolemia. "( Preparation and evaluation of multi particulates drug delivery system using natural polymers.
Baig, T; Sheikh, H; Srivastava, A; Tripathi, PK; Tripathi, S, 2015
)
1.86
"Simvastatin is a HMG-CoA reductase Inhibitor and a substrate of CYP3A4. "( A pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction model of simvastatin and clarithromycin in humans.
Chaiwong, K; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J; Pongpanich, K; Sonsingh, P, 2014
)
2.1
"Simvastatin is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor commonly used in the clinic to treat hypercholesterolemia. "( Simvastatin increases excitability in the hippocampus via a PI3 kinase-dependent mechanism.
Herron, CE; Hughes, B; Métais, C, 2015
)
3.3
"Simvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering drug with immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic effects."( The possible protective effect of simvastatin and pioglitazone separately and in combination on bleomycin-induced changes in mice thin skin.
Balaha, M; Kandeel, S, 2015
)
1.42
"Simvastatin is a synthetic lipid lowering drug and Nigella sativa seeds found helpful in controlling hyperlipidemia."( Comparative evaluation of Nigella sativa (Kalonji) and simvastatin for the treatment of hyperlipidemia and in the induction of hepatotoxicity.
Majeed, A; Muneera, KE; Naveed, AK, 2015
)
1.39
"Simvastatin is an efficient inhibitor of cholesterol synthesis that has various myotoxic consequences."( Structural analysis of alterations in zebrafish muscle differentiation induced by simvastatin and their recovery with cholesterol.
Atella, GC; Benchimol, M; Campos, LM; Costa, ML; Herculano-Houzel, S; Mermelstein, C; Midlej, V; Rios, EA, 2015
)
1.36
"Simvastatin is a statin used to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, but has limitations in patients on complicated regimens due to concerns about drug-drug interactions. "( Comparative efficacy of pitavastatin and simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
Cui, L; Ma, N, 2015
)
2.13
"Simvastatin (SIM) is a lipid-soluble inhibitor of hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase with multiple reported therapeutic benefits. "( Simvastatin prevents isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy through modulation of the JAK/STAT pathway.
Al-Manee, RZ; Al-Oteibi, MM; Al-Rasheed, NM; Al-Shareef, SA; Hasan, IH; Mahmoud, AM; Mohamad, RA, 2015
)
3.3
"Simvastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor commonly used to reduce serum cholesterol. "( Intravenous Administration of Simvastatin Improves Cognitive Outcome following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats.
Boutté, AM; Gilsdorf, J; Lu, XC; Mountney, A; Shear, DA; Tortella, FC, 2016
)
2.17
"Simvastatin is an antilipemic drug that promotes inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. "( Modulating effect of simvastatin on the DNA damage induced by doxorubicin in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster.
Nepomuceno, JC; Orsolin, PC; Silva-Oliveira, RG, 2016
)
2.2
"Simvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering drug, inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase. "( Simvastatin Reduces Cancerogenic Potential of Renal Cancer Cells via Geranylgeranyl Pyrophosphate and Mevalonate Pathway.
Jurida, K; Kneip, N; Marzi, I; Relja, B; Woschek, M, 2016
)
3.32
"Simvastatin is a lipid lowering drug whose beneficial role on bone metabolism was discovered in 1999. "( Role of Simvastatin on fracture healing and osteoporosis: a systematic review on in vivo investigations.
Moshiri, A; Oryan, A; Sharifi, AM, 2016
)
2.31
"Simvastatin (SV) is a drug from the statin class, currently used orally as an anti-cholesterolemic drug. "( Could simvastatin be considered as a potential therapy for chronic lung diseases? A debate on the pros and cons.
Colombo, P; Ong, HX; Traini, D; Tulbah, AS; Young, PM, 2016
)
2.36
"Simvastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor widely used for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. "( Simvastatin induces insulin resistance in L6 skeletal muscle myotubes by suppressing insulin signaling, GLUT4 expression and GSK-3β phosphorylation.
Kokkola, T; Modi, S; Yaluri, N, 2016
)
3.32
"Simvastatin is a common medication prescribed for hypercholesterolemia that accelerates local bone formation. "( Simvastatin Exposure and Rotator Cuff Repair in a Rat Model.
Behrens, SB; Coleman, SH; Deren, ME; Dines, JS; Doty, S; Drakos, MC; Ehteshami, JR, 2017
)
3.34
"Simvastatin (SMV) is a specific competitive inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-2-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase that promotes bone formation. "( Clinical Efficacy of Subgingivally Delivered 1.2 mg Simvastatin in the Treatment of Patients with Aggressive Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Abhilash, A; Gupta, A; Kalra, N; Kudyar, N; Malgaonkar, N; Pradeep, AR; Saquib, S,
)
1.82
"Simvastatin is a competitive inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme of the mevalonate pathway required for the biosynthesis of cholesterol and higher isoprenoids such as geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP). "( HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin overcomes bortezomib-induced apoptosis resistance by disrupting a geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate-dependent survival pathway.
Berges, C; Daniel, V; Fuchs, D; Naujokat, C; Opelz, G, 2008
)
2.08
"Simvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering agent whose functional significance and neuroprotective mechanism in ischemic brain injury is not yet solved. "( Molecular analysis of endoplasmic reticulum stress response after global forebrain ischemia/reperfusion in rats: effect of neuroprotectant simvastatin.
Kaminska, B; Kaplán, P; Lehotský, J; Pavlíková, M; Sivonová, M; Tatarková, Z; Urban, P, 2009
)
2
"Simvastatin is a pro-drug of the potent 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. "( The effect of simvastatin on the differentiation of marrow stromal cells from aging rats.
Dai, K; Liu, M; Tang, T; Wang, K; Zhu, Z, 2009
)
2.16
"Simvastatin is a chemical modification of lovastatin, a rate-limiting enzyme of the cholesterol synthesis pathway. "( The use of simvastatin in bone regeneration.
Park, JB, 2009
)
2.19
"Simvastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor commonly known as a cholesterol-lowering drug with additional pleiotropic effects. "( Simvastatin improves wound strength after intestinal anastomosis in the rat.
Acikgoz, S; Ankarali, H; Bahadir, B; Comert, M; Demirtas, C; Emre, AU; Irkorucu, O; Karadeniz Cakmak, G; Karakaya, K; Kertis, G; Pasaoglu, H; Tascilar, O; Ucan, BH, 2009
)
3.24
"Simvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering medication heavily prescribed to treat and prevent vascular disease. "( Recovery time in a case of gemfibrozil and simvastatin-associated rhabdomyolysis.
Baker, E; Cummins, D; Mackey, M, 2009
)
2.06
"Simvastatin is considered to be a promising agent for the treatment of endometriosis-associated fibrosis, which is among the major pathologies caused by endometriosis."( Simvastatin inhibits the proliferation and the contractility of human endometriotic stromal cells: a promising agent for the treatment of endometriosis.
Narahara, H; Nasu, K; Tsuno, A; Yuge, A, 2009
)
2.52
"Simvastatin is a commonly prescribed, moderately potent statin. "( Does simvastatin cause more myotoxicity compared with other statins?
Backes, JM; Howard, PA; Moriarty, PM; Ruisinger, JF, 2009
)
2.31
"Simvastatin (SS) is an effective cholesterol-lowering medicine, and is hydrolyzed to simvastatin acid (SSA) after oral administration. "( High-throughput salting-out assisted liquid/liquid extraction with acetonitrile for the simultaneous determination of simvastatin and simvastatin acid in human plasma with liquid chromatography.
El-Shourbagy, TA; Fan, L; Gage, E; Hautman, M; King, LL; Rodila, R; Wu, H; Zhang, J, 2010
)
2.01
"Simvastatin is a hypolipemic drug with proven efficacy in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases."( The influence of simvastatin on selected inflammatory markers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Dziedzina, S; Iwaniec, T; Kaczmarek, P; Rzeszutko, M; Skucha, W; Szczeklik, A; Sładek, K, 2010
)
1.42
"Simvastatin (SMV) is a specific competitive inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase."( Clinical effect of subgingivally delivered simvastatin in the treatment of patients with chronic periodontitis: a randomized clinical trial.
Pradeep, AR; Thorat, MS, 2010
)
1.34
"Simvastatin is a hypolipidemic drug which is used to control hypercholesterolemia and to prevent cardiovascular disease. "( Determination of simvastatin-induced changes in bone composition and structure by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in rat animal model.
Garip, S; Severcan, F, 2010
)
2.14
"Simvastatin is a hypocholesterolemic agent presumed to cause peripheral neuropathy. "( Microscopic and electrophysiological changes on regenerating sciatic nerves of rats treated with simvastatin.
Berker, M; Daglioglu, E; Demirci, M; Karabulut, E; Tuncel, A; Tuncel, M, 2010
)
2.02
"Simvastatin is a hypocholestrolemic drug that is insoluble in water. "( Enhanced dissolution rate of simvastatin using spherical crystallization technique.
Salamat, FA; Tavakoli, N; Varshosaz, J, 2011
)
2.1
"Simvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering drug which inhibits 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarylcoenzyme CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase."( Simvastatin inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis and G0/G1 cell cycle arrest in hepatic cancer cells.
Henrich, D; Lehnert, M; Marzi, I; Meder, F; Relja, B; Wilhelm, K, 2010
)
2.52
"Simvastatin is an effective lymphocyte-suppressing and anti-inflammatory agent irrespective of plasma lipid levels."( The effect of simvastatin on lymphocyte secretory function in patients with impaired fasting glucose.
Krysiak, R; Okopien, B, 2010
)
1.44
"Simvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering drug that is widely used to prevent and treat atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. "( Simvastatin stimulates apoptosis in cholangiocarcinoma by inhibition of Rac1 activity.
Dostal, DE; Glaser, SS; Guerrier, M; Meng, F; Miller, T; Munshi, MK; Priester, S; Wise, CE; Yang, F, 2011
)
3.25
"Simvastatin is an effective lymphocyte-suppressing agent in mixed dyslipidemic patients but not in IGT patients."( Lymphocyte-suppressing effect of simvastatin in mixed dyslipidemic patients but not impaired glucose tolerance patients.
Krysiak, R; Okopień, B, 2011
)
1.37
"Simvastatin is a competitive inhibitor of 3-hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity, whereas geraniol is a monoterpene with multiple pharmacologic effects on mevalonate metabolism. "( Geraniol and simvastatin show a synergistic effect on a human hepatocarcinoma cell line.
Crespo, R; de Bravo, MG; Polo, MP, 2011
)
2.18
"Simvastatin is a hydrophobic statin that enters cells by other mechanisms."( Differential effects of pravastatin and simvastatin on the growth of tumor cells from different organ sites.
Chakraborty, K; Harirforoosh, S; Hsi, L; Krishnan, K; Menter, DG; Newman, RA; Ramsauer, VP; Yang, P, 2011
)
1.36
"Simvastatin (SMV) is a specific competitive inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase. "( Efficacy of subgingivally delivered simvastatin in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic periodontitis: a randomized double-masked controlled clinical trial.
Bajaj, P; Kumari, M; Pradeep, AR; Rao, NS, 2013
)
2.11
"Simvastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor, which has been shown to ameliorate the development of pulmonary hypertension in animal model by suppression of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (PASMCs) proliferation, yet its underlying molecular mechanisms are not completely understood. "( Statins inhibit pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell proliferation by upregulation of HO-1 and p21WAF1.
Han, D; Li, M; Li, S; Liu, Y; Lu, J; Shi, H; Wang, G; Wu, Y; Xie, X; Xu, J; Zhang, D; Zhang, Y, 2012
)
1.82
"For simvastatin, solubility is a crucial rate limiting factor to achieve its desired level in systemic circulation for pharmacological response."( Solubility enhancement of simvastatin: a review.
Murtaza, G,
)
0.91
"Simvastatin is a substrate of CYP3A4 enzyme."( Paracetamol and simvastatin: a potential interaction resulting in hepatotoxicity.
Gumbrevičius, G; Stankevičius, E; Sveikata, A; Sveikatienė, R, 2012
)
1.45
"Simvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering drug whose pleiotropic effects may have a therapeutic impact on bone. "( Protective mechanisms of simvastatin in experimental periodontal disease.
Brito, GA; Dalcico, R; de Menezes, AM; Deocleciano, OB; Oriá, RB; Ribeiro, RA; Vale, ML, 2013
)
2.14
"Simvastatin is an effective hypolipemic agent."( [Simvastatin and extrinsic coagulation pathway in peritoneally dialyzed patients].
Hryszko, T; Małyszko, J; Małyszko, JS; Myśliwiec, M; Pawlak, K, 2002
)
1.95
"Simvastatin is a competitive inhibitor of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase which is effective in the treatment of various hyperlipidemia. "( [Simvastatin-induced lichen planus pemphigoides].
Durand, L; Ligeron, C; Meunier, L; Meynadier, J; Michot, C; Stoebner, PE, 2003
)
2.67
"simvastatin is an effective oral antilipemic agent for treating Thai patients with hypercholesterolemia. "( Oral simvastatin as an antilipemic therapy: effect on creatine kinase in hypercholesterolemic subjects.
Assawawitoontip, S; Wiwanitkit, V, 2003
)
2.28
"Simvastatin is a competitive inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, the rate-determining enzyme for cholesterol synthesis which is used in the treatment of hypercholesterolemias, particularly in type IIa and IIb hyperlipoproteinemias, frequently in postmenopausal women. "( Effects of simvastatin on the development of osteopenia caused by ovariectomy in rats.
Gubała, I; Janiec, W; Misiarz-Myrta, M; Pytlik, M,
)
1.96
"Simvastatin is an effective hypolipemic agent in CAPD patients. "( Influence of simvastatin on aspects of thrombogenesis in CAPD patients.
Hryszko, T; Malyszko, J; Malyszko, JS; Mysliwiec, M,
)
1.94
"Simvastatin is a hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor commonly used to treat patients with hyperlipidemia. "( Rhabdomyolysis associated with simvastatin-nefazodone therapy.
Monaghan, MS; Skrabal, MZ; Stading, JA, 2003
)
2.05
"Simvastatin is a component of the Heart Health Programme, which also addresses other modifiable risk factors such as diet, exercise, and smoking."( Reclassification of simvastatin to over-the-counter status in the United Kingdom: a primary prevention strategy.
Nash, DB; Nash, SA, 2004
)
1.37
"Simvastatin is a long-established hydroxy-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, first introduced in 1988. "( Simvastatin: a review.
Pedersen, TR; Tobert, JA, 2004
)
3.21
"Simvastatin is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor responsible for many clinical benefits."( The changes in the endothelial expression of cell adhesion molecules and iNOS in the vessel wall after the short-term administration of simvastatin in rabbit model of atherosclerosis.
Kopecky, M; Nachtigal, P; Semecky, V; Solichova, D; Zdansky, P, 2005
)
1.25
"Simvastatin is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor that is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4."( Interaction between amlodipine and simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension.
Hayashi, H; Kosuge, K; Nishio, S; Ohashi, K; Uchida, S; Watanabe, H, 2005
)
1.33
"Simvastatin therapy seems to be a cost-effective and useful method for lymphocyte cross-match-positive kidney transplantation candidates compared with immunoadsorption or intravenous immunoglobulin use."( Simvastatin therapy in lymphocyte cross-match-positive kidney transplantation candidates.
Demirbas, A; Dinckan, A; Gurkan, A; Karatas, GU; Kececioglu, N; Kocak, H; Tuncer, M; Yakupoglu, U; Yakupoglu, YK; Yegin, O, 2005
)
3.21
"Simvastatin is a powerful inhibitor of type I collagen gene expression in normal and systemic sclerosis fibroblasts. "( Inhibition of systemic sclerosis dermal fibroblast type I collagen production and gene expression by simvastatin.
Fertala, J; Huaman, G; Jiménez, SA; Louneva, N, 2006
)
1.99
"Simvastatin is a semisynthetic derivative of the fungal polyketide lovastatin and is an important drug for lowering cholesterol levels in adults. "( Efficient synthesis of simvastatin by use of whole-cell biocatalysis.
Tang, Y; Xie, X, 2007
)
2.09
"Simvastatin (SIM) is a commonly prescribed statin with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties."( Gastric antisecretory and antiulcer effects of simvastatin in rats.
Al Moutaery, M; Al Rayes, H; Al Swailam, R; Arshaduddin, M; Elfaki, I; Khan, HA; Tariq, M, 2007
)
1.32
"Simvastatin is an important cholesterol lowering compound and is currently synthesized from the natural product lovastatin via multistep chemical synthesis. "( Improving simvastatin bioconversion in Escherichia coli by deletion of bioH.
Tang, Y; Wong, WW; Xie, X, 2007
)
2.18
"Simvastatin is a promising candidate of a novel medical treatment for the prevention of CA progression."( Simvastatin suppresses the progression of experimentally induced cerebral aneurysms in rats.
Aoki, T; Hashimoto, N; Ishibashi, R; Kataoka, H; Nozaki, K, 2008
)
2.51
"Simvastatin is an agent of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor group of drugs. "( Simvastatin: two decades in a circle.
Cokkinos, DV; Ioannis, V; Katerina, A; Kolovou, GD, 2008
)
3.23
"Simvastatin proves to be a safe and effective lipid-lowering drug during long-term treatment."( Long-term experience (6 years) with simvastatin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia.
Knops, RE; Kroon, AA; Mol, MJ; Stalenhoef, AF; Stuyt, PM, 1995
)
2.01
"Simvastatin is a hypolipidaemic agent, a statin which inhibits cellular cholesterol synthesis by blocking 3HMG CoA reductase. "( [Monitoring plasma levels of vitamin D metabolites in simvastatin (Zocor) therapy in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia].
Ceska, R; Justová, V; Jůzová, Z; Kvasilová, M; Procházková, R; Sobra, J; Wilczek, H, 1994
)
1.98
"Simvastatin is an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, the key enzyme in the synthesis of cholesterol, recently introduced in the therapy of hypercholesterolemic patients. "( Effects of long-term simvastatin treatment on testicular and adrenal steroidogenesis in hypercholesterolemic patients.
Argenio, GF; Bernini, GP; Franchi, F; Gasperi, M; Salvetti, A; Vivaldi, MS, 1994
)
2.05
"Simvastatin is a safe, effective therapy for hypercholesterolemia in proteinuric states."( Simvastatin therapy for hypercholesterolemic patients with nephrotic syndrome or significant proteinuria.
Harris, KP; Hattersley, JM; Moorhead, JF; Ramaswamy, C; Thomas, ME; Varghese, Z; Walls, J; Wheeler, DC; Williams, JD, 1993
)
2.45
"Simvastatin is a methyl analogue of lovastatin and acts as an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor effective in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. "( Clinical pharmacokinetics and practical applications of simvastatin.
Mauro, VF, 1993
)
1.97
"Simvastatin seems to be an effective and relatively well-tolerated drug for dyslipemias in CAPD."( The effect of simvastatin on dyslipemia in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.
Antoniou, S; Dimitriadis, A; Hatzisavvas, N; Kaldi, I; Pastore, F; Stangou, M, 1993
)
1.37
"Simvastatin is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor used in the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolaemia. "( Simvastatin. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in hypercholesterolaemia.
McTavish, D; Plosker, GL, 1995
)
3.18
"Simvastatin is a very effective hypocholesterolemic drug which, reducing cholesterol biosynthesis, can affect normal steroid hormone production. "( Testicular function in hypercholesterolemic male patients during prolonged simvastatin treatment.
Azzarito, C; Boiardi, L; Portioli, I; Vergoni, W; Zini, M, 1996
)
1.97
"Simvastatin is an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase and also selectively inhibits the growth of leukaemic progenitor cells. "( A comparison of the effect of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors simvastatin, lovastatin and pravastatin on leukaemic and normal bone marrow progenitors.
Catovsky, D; Clutterbuck, RD; Millar, JL; Newman, A; Powles, RL, 1997
)
1.95
"Simvastatin is a potent inhibitor of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase intended for use as a hypocholesterolemic agent. "( Rhabdomyolysis associated with simvastatin-gemfibrozil therapy.
Isley, W; Rajeshawari, M; Tal, A, 1997
)
2.03
"Simvastatin (SV) is a lactone prodrug used for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. "( In vitro metabolism of simvastatin in humans [SBT]identification of metabolizing enzymes and effect of the drug on hepatic P450s.
Arison, BH; Gorham, LM; Liu, L; Ma, B; Prueksaritanont, T; Slaughter, DE; Vyas, KP; Yu, X; Zhao, JJ, 1997
)
2.05
"Simvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering agent that is metabolized through CYP3A4. "( Grapefruit juice-simvastatin interaction: effect on serum concentrations of simvastatin, simvastatin acid, and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
Kivistö, KT; Lilja, JJ; Neuvonen, PJ, 1998
)
2.08
"Simvastatin is a substrate for cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4)."( Concomitant use of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors and simvastatin.
Dobrinska, MR; Gruer, PJ; Mercuri, MF; Tobert, JA; Vega, JM, 1999
)
1.27
"Simvastatin is an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase used in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. "( Endothelium modulates contractile response to simvastatin in rat aorta.
Alvarez de Sotomayor, M; Herrera, MD; Marhuenda, E; Pérez-Guerrero, C,
)
1.83
"Simvastatin is an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase that is used as a cholesterol-lowering agent and is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) enzymes. "( The interaction of diltiazem with simvastatin.
Brater, DC; Hall, SD; Mousa, O; Sunblad, KJ, 2000
)
2.03
"Simvastatin is a highly effective cholesterol-lowering drug with a beneficial effect on the entire lipid spectrum in a cross-section of Asian patients, and is well tolerated."( A randomised comparison of simvastatin versus simvastatin and low cholesterol diet in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia.
Chong, KS; Pasamanikam, K; Tan, KH; Thuraisingham, S; Yap, SF, 2000
)
1.33
"Simvastatin is a safe and efficacious lipid-lowering drug."( Lipid-lowering effect of simvastatin in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Goyal, RK; Udawat, H,
)
1.16
"Simvastatin is an effective hypolipemic agent and favorably affects platelet aggregation, endothelial function and fibrinolysis in CAPD patients."( Effects of long-term treatment with simvastatin on some hemostatic parameters in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.
Hryszko, T; Małyszko, J; Małyszko, JS; Myśliwiec, M,
)
1.85
"Simvastatin appears to be a safe and effective treatme"( Safety and efficacy of simvastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients undergoing chronic renal dialysis.
Morgan, C; Rigby, RJ; Saltissi, D; Westhuyzen, J, 2002
)
1.35
"Simvastatin is an effective hypocholesterolemic drug that inhibits cholesterol synthesis selectively in the liver, but could have potential side effects on the adrenal gland, ovary, and testis, as these three glands use cholesterol for their hormonal biosynthesis. "( Long-term therapy with high-dose simvastatin does not affect adrenocortical and gonadal hormones in hypercholesterolemic patients.
Agosti, A; Azzarito, C; Biagi, R; Boiardi, L; Dotti, C; Portioli, I; Zini, M, 1992
)
2.01
"Simvastatin is a pharmacological molecule belonging to the family of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, recently included in plasma cholesterol lowering therapy. "( [Dyslipidemia in the uremic patient: the therapeutic role played by simvastatin].
Angelé, B; Bellinghieri, G; Savica, V, 1992
)
1.96
"Simvastatin is an effective, well tolerated lipid lowering drug, without significant attenuation of effect with prolonged use. "( Treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia with simvastatin. New Zealand multicentre evaluation.
Charleson, H; French, JK; Lewis, GR; Lintott, CJ; Maling, TJ; Nye, ER; Reuben, S; Scott, RS; Sharpe, DN; White, HD, 1991
)
1.98
"Simvastatin (SV) is a lactone prodrug which undergoes reversible metabolism."( Metabolic disposition studies on simvastatin, a cholesterol-lowering prodrug.
Chen, IW; Duggan, DE; Duncan, CA; Rosegay, A; Vickers, S,
)
1.13
"Simvastatin is a potent competitive inhibitor of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase) which is the rate-limiting enzyme of cholesterol synthesis. "( Biochemical changes and morphological alterations of the liver in guinea-pigs after administration of simvastatin (HMG CoA reductase-inhibitor).
Desager, JP; Harvengt, C; Horsmans, Y, 1990
)
1.94
"Simvastatin appears to be an important asset in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia."( The effects of simvastatin on serum lipoproteins in severe hypercholesterolaemia.
Demacker, PN; Mol, MJ; Stalenhoef, AF; Stuyt, PM, 1990
)
1.35
"Simvastatin is an effective cholesterol lowering agent in older patients."( The use of simvastatin, an HMG CoA reductase inhibitor, in older patients with hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis.
Bach, LA; Cooper, ME; Jerums, G; O'Brien, RC, 1990
)
1.39
"Simvastatin appears to be a well-tolerated and effective new agent used once-a-day as an adjunct to diet in the management of patients with hypercholesterolemia."( Effects of simvastatin and probucol in hypercholesterolemia (Simvastatin Multicenter Study Group II).
Alexander, S; Cook, TJ; Mantell, G; Pietro, DA; Staggers, JE, 1989
)
1.39
"Simvastatin appeared also to be a potent hypolipidemic drug in 10 patients with familial dysbetalipoproteinemia."( Efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin (MK-733).
Mol, MJ; Stalenhoef, AF; Stuyt, PM, 1989
)
1.29
"Simvastatin appears to be an effective and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia and, as further study confirms long-term safety and efficacy, it should become a useful addition to the therapeutic armamentarium."( Simvastatin: the clinical profile.
Walker, JF, 1989
)
2.44
"Simvastatin seems to be an effective and safe drug as monotherapy in the treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia."( Simvastatin (MK 733) in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a two-year trial.
Harvengt, C; Leclercq, V, 1989
)
2.44
"Simvastatin appears to be an important asset in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia."( [Efficacy and safety of simvastatin, a new cholesterol-lowering drug].
Mol, MJ; Stalenhoef, AF; Stuyt, PM, 1989
)
1.31

Effects

Simvastatin has a potent cytotoxic effect resulting in the death of human breast cancer MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines, demonstrating its potential as a new candidate for cancer drug. It has a cardioprotective effects against LPS induced apoptosis.

Simvastatin has been shown to regulate lipids that are involved in memory formation but its influence on other cognitive processes is elusive. It has been reported to exhibit anti-tumor activity in a variety of cancers; but its roles and molecular mechanisms in RCC remain unclear.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Simvastatin has a potent cytotoxic effect resulting in the death of human breast cancer MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines, demonstrating its potential as a new candidate for cancer drug.
."
( Cytotoxicity of Simvastatin in Human Breast Cancer MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 Cell Lines.
Gunawan, T; Rangkuti, AR; Rezano, A; Ridhayanti, F; Wijaya, I; Winarno, GNA, 2021
)
2.41
"Simvastatin has a protective effect on myocardial depression caused by sepsis."( An experimental study of the protective effect of simvastatin on sepsis-induced myocardial depression in rats.
Wang, Y; Yang, W; Zhang, L; Zhang, R; Zhao, X, 2017
)
1.43
"Simvastatin has an additional pleiotropic effect halting inflammation and decreasing fibrosis due to increasing IL-10 leading to a hepatoprotective effect."( Simvastatin exerts antifibrotic effect and potentiates the antischistosomal effects of praziquantel in a murine model: Role of IL10.
Aboulfotouh, N; Aladeeb, NM; Elkaref, A; Elmasry, A, 2017
)
2.62
"Simvastatin has a cardioprotective effects against LPS induced apoptosis."( Simvastatin Protects Cardiomyocytes Against Endotoxin-induced Apoptosis and Up-regulates Survivin/NF-κB/p65 Expression.
Amidžić, L; Gajanin, R; Jaćević, V; Kuča, K; Nežić, L; Škrbić, R, 2018
)
2.64
"Simvastatin has a protective effect against acute pancreatitis."( Acute pancreatitis.
Talukdar, R; Vege, SS, 2015
)
1.14
"Simvastatin has a suppressing effect on LPS-induced inflammatory cytokine, cell adhesion molecules and NF-κB transcription factors in HDPCs. "( Simvastatin inhibits the expression of inflammatory cytokines and cell adhesion molecules induced by LPS in human dental pulp cells.
Choi, CH; Hwang, YC; Jung, JY; Kim, WJ; Koh, JT; Lee, BN; Lee, KJ; Min, KS; Nör, JE; Woo, SM, 2017
)
3.34
"Simvastatin may has a potential therapeutic target in diabetic nephropathy, which may be partly attributed to down-regulating over-expression of MMP-9 in renal tissue."( Simvastatin protects diabetic rats against kidney injury through the suppression of renal matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression.
Chen, K; Chen, Y; Li, XC; Wang, YX; Yang, GW; Yao, XM; Ye, SD; Zai, Z, 2010
)
3.25
"Simvastatin has an inhibitory effect on the differentiation and maturation of DC, and selectively reduce the T-cell proliferation induced by DC from patients with ON."( Increased immunopotency of monocyte derived dendritic cells from patients with optic neuritis is inhibited in vitro by simvastatin.
Frederiksen, J; Svane, IM; Tsakiri, A; Tsiantoulas, D, 2010
)
1.29
"Simvastatin has a dual effect on tumorigenesis. "( HMG-CoA reductase inhibition causes increased necrosis and apoptosis in an in vivo mouse glioblastoma multiforme model.
Bababeygy, SR; Hou, LC; Polevaya, NV; Prugpichailers, T; Steinman, L; Sun, A; Tse, V; Veeravagu, A; Xiong, A; Youssef, S, 2009
)
1.8
"Simvastatin has a preventive effect on rat PH, it inhibits mast cell proliferation may be one of mechanism."( [The change of mast cells and macrophages in the lung of rat with pulmonary hypertension].
Dou, H; Li, P; Su, J; Zhang, T; Zhao, L; Zhao, Y; Zhou, TF, 2006
)
1.06
"Simvastatin has a strong anti-inflammatory effect on HPBM cells including upregulation of the atheroprotective factor KLF-2. "( Simvastatin has an anti-inflammatory effect on macrophages via upregulation of an atheroprotective transcription factor, Kruppel-like factor 2.
Häkkinen, SK; Horrevoets, AJ; Kansanen, E; Levonen, AL; Lumivuori, H; Tuomisto, TT; Turunen, MP; van Thienen, JV; Ylä-Herttuala, S, 2008
)
3.23
"Simvastatin also has a preventive effect on the progression of preexisting CAs."( Simvastatin suppresses the progression of experimentally induced cerebral aneurysms in rats.
Aoki, T; Hashimoto, N; Ishibashi, R; Kataoka, H; Nozaki, K, 2008
)
2.51
"Simvastatin has a beneficial effect on abnormal lipid levels in SRNS but the effectiveness of long-term therapy needs to be evaluated."( Hyperlipidaemia, diet and simvastatin therapy in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome of childhood.
Coleman, JE; Watson, AR, 1996
)
1.32
"Simvastatin has been shown to regulate lipids that are involved in memory formation but its influence on other cognitive processes is elusive."( Simvastatin Blocks Reinstatement of Cocaine-induced Conditioned Place Preference in Male Mice with Brain Lipidome Remodeling.
Cen, X; Dai, Y; He, Y; Jiang, L; Li, H; Li, M; Liu, H; Wan, X; Wang, Y; Xu, R; Xu, W; Zhang, H; Zhang, J; Zhao, Y, 2021
)
2.79
"Simvastatin has previously been associated with drug-induced interstitial lung disease. "( Role of Drug-Gene Interactions and Pharmacogenetics in Simvastatin-Associated Pulmonary Toxicity.
Bast, A; Bekers, O; Drent, M; Harmsze, AM; Jessurun, NT; van Puijenbroek, EP; Wijnen, PA, 2021
)
2.31
"Simvastatin has been shown to be cardioprotective by decreasing matrix metalloproteinases' (MMPs) activity."( HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor, Simvastatin Is Effective in Decreasing Degree of Myocarditis by Inhibiting Metalloproteinases Activation.
Haczkiewicz-Leśniak, K; Kwiatkowska, J; Piasecki, T; Podhorska-Okołów, M; Sapa-Wojciechowska, A; Skrzypiec-Spring, M; Szeląg, A, 2021
)
1.63
"Simvastatin has potential anti-thrombotic effects on liver endothelial cells."( Simvastatin Prevents Liver Microthrombosis and Sepsis Induced Coagulopathy in a Rat Model of Endotoxemia.
Arnaboldi, F; Bitto, N; Colombo, M; Denti, L; Dondossola, D; Gagliano, N; La Mura, V; Latini, R; Liguori, E; Peyvandi, F; Procacci, P; Ristagno, G; Salerno, F; Sartori, P; Tripodi, A, 2022
)
2.89
"Simvastatin has been tested as vasoprotective drug in experimental models of CLD showing promising results, but also limiting adverse effects."( Simvastatin-loaded polymeric micelles are more effective and less toxic than conventional statins in a pre-clinical model of advanced chronic liver disease.
Andrade, F; Augustin, S; Barberá, A; Bravo, M; Genescà, J; Gil, M; Gracia-Sancho, J; Hide, D; Martell, M; Rafael, D; Raurell, I; Schwartz, S; Vargas, V, 2020
)
2.72
"Simvastatin has attracted considerable attention since the discovery of its pharmacological effects on different pathogenic processes, including inflammation."( Simvastatin abolishes nitric oxide- and reactive oxygen species-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression by blocking the nuclear factor κB pathway in rabbit articular chondrocytes.
Han, Y; Kim, SJ; Yu, SM, 2020
)
2.72
"Simvastatin (SIM) has been documented to induce the osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs). "( A simvastatin-releasing scaffold with periodontal ligament stem cell sheets for periodontal regeneration.
Chen, J; Deng, J; Li, Q; Zhao, B; Zhao, L,
)
2.3
"Simvastatin has been reported to exhibit anti-tumor activity in a variety of cancers; however, its roles and molecular mechanisms in RCC remain unclear."( Simvastatin suppresses renal cell carcinoma cells by regulating DDX5/DUSP5.
Jin, C; Liu, W; Qiu, Y; Wang, H; Xu, W; Zhao, Y, 2021
)
2.79
"Simvastatin has a potent cytotoxic effect resulting in the death of human breast cancer MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines, demonstrating its potential as a new candidate for cancer drug.
."
( Cytotoxicity of Simvastatin in Human Breast Cancer MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 Cell Lines.
Gunawan, T; Rangkuti, AR; Rezano, A; Ridhayanti, F; Wijaya, I; Winarno, GNA, 2021
)
2.41
"Simvastatin has been touted as a potential neuroprotective agent for neurologic disorders such as PD, but the specific underlying mechanism remains unclear."( Simvastatin Prevents Neurodegeneration in the MPTP Mouse Model of Parkinson's Disease via Inhibition of A1 Reactive Astrocytes.
Bu, WG; Du, RW, 2021
)
2.79
"Simvastatin has been determined efficiently by the developed method either alone or in mixture with lovastatin giving LOQ values of 0.009 and 0.02% w/w, respectively indicating good sensitivity."( FTIR spectroscopic study of two isostructural statins: Simvastatin and Lovastatin as authentic and in pharmaceuticals.
Abdel Hakiem, AF; Ali, HRH; Mohamed, NA, 2021
)
1.59
"Simvastatin has a protective effect on myocardial depression caused by sepsis."( An experimental study of the protective effect of simvastatin on sepsis-induced myocardial depression in rats.
Wang, Y; Yang, W; Zhang, L; Zhang, R; Zhao, X, 2017
)
1.43
"Simvastatin has an additional pleiotropic effect halting inflammation and decreasing fibrosis due to increasing IL-10 leading to a hepatoprotective effect."( Simvastatin exerts antifibrotic effect and potentiates the antischistosomal effects of praziquantel in a murine model: Role of IL10.
Aboulfotouh, N; Aladeeb, NM; Elkaref, A; Elmasry, A, 2017
)
2.62
"Simvastatin has been reported to reduce cardiovascular related morbidity and mortality in clinical trials which was independent of its cholesterol-lowering effect. "( Protective Effect and Potential Mechanism of Simvastatin on Myocardial Injury Induced by Diabetes with Hypoglycemia.
Chen, H; Cui, X; Li, H; Liu, R; Yang, L; Zhao, Q, 2018
)
2.18
"Simvastatin has protective effect on myocardial injury caused by diabetes with hypoglycemia, which is associated with increased calcium sensitivity, decreased NF-κB expression and altered miRNA expression profile."( Protective Effect and Potential Mechanism of Simvastatin on Myocardial Injury Induced by Diabetes with Hypoglycemia.
Chen, H; Cui, X; Li, H; Liu, R; Yang, L; Zhao, Q, 2018
)
2.18
"Simvastatin has been applied to improve and accelerate the osseointegration of implants by increasing the quantity and quality of bone tissue."( Simvastatin improves oral implant osseointegration via enhanced autophagy and osteogenesis of BMSCs and inhibited osteoclast activity.
Cheng, J; Fu, Y; Gu, Q; Jiang, H; Shi, G; Xu, L; Xu, R; Zhang, P, 2018
)
2.64
"simvastatin has been demonstrated to exhibit antitumor effects, and so the aim of the present study was to assess the effects of simvastatin on the growth of human PTEN haploinsufficient lipoma cells."( Simvastatin induces apoptosis in PTEN‑haploinsufficient lipoma cells.
Garten, A; Händel, N; Kässner, F; Kiess, W; Körner, A; Landgraf, K; Penke, M; Richter, S; Sauer, T, 2018
)
2.64
"Simvastatin has been reported to be associated with neuroprotective effect after spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury."( The attenuation of neurological injury from the use of simvastatin after spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.
Han, SH; Hwang, JY; Kim, JH; Park, JW; Park, SJ; Ryu, JH; Sohn, HM, 2018
)
1.45
"Simvastatin has been reported to promote osteoblastic activity, inhibit osteoclastic activity, and support osteoblast differentiation induced by bone morphogenetic protein. "( Evaluation of the Efficacy of Simvastatin in Bone Regeneration after Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Third Molars-A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.
Bathija, NA; Degala, S, 2018
)
2.21
"Simvastatin has recently been demonstrated to serve a potential role in the prophylaxis and therapeutics of a number of human cancers."( Effect of survivin downregulation by simvastatin on the growth and invasion of salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma.
Cai, WY; Li, T; Song, WT; Sun, JH; Yan, F; Zhuang, Y, 2018
)
1.48
"Simvastatin has different effects on the proliferation, apoptosis and protein expressions of KFs in a dosedependent manner under different conditions. "( [Different effects of simvastatin on keloid fibroblasts under hypoxia and TGF-β1 treatment].
An, Y; Chen, B; Kang, C; Qin, Z; Yu, D; Zhao, X, 2016
)
2.19
"Simvastatin has a cardioprotective effects against LPS induced apoptosis."( Simvastatin Protects Cardiomyocytes Against Endotoxin-induced Apoptosis and Up-regulates Survivin/NF-κB/p65 Expression.
Amidžić, L; Gajanin, R; Jaćević, V; Kuča, K; Nežić, L; Škrbić, R, 2018
)
2.64
"simvastatin has pleiotropic anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects potentially usefull to prevent chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal mucositis. "( Effects of simvastatin on 5-fluorouracil-induced gastrointestinal mucositis in rats.
Araújo Filho, I; Azevedo, ÍM; Lima, ML; Medeiros, ADC; Moreira, MD, 2018
)
2.31
"Simvastatin therapy has beneficial effects on inflammatory markers in plasma, but CoQ10 supplementation seems to have no additional potentiating effect in patients in primary prevention. "( Inflammatory biomarkers in patients in Simvastatin treatment: No effect of co-enzyme Q10 supplementation.
Chrøis, KM; Dela, F; Dohlmann, TL; Hansen, M; Helge, JW; Kelly, B; Kuhlman, ACB; Larsen, S; Morville, T; Sahl, RE, 2019
)
2.23
"Simvastatin has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in preclinical studies via tumor cell senescence, apoptosis, and anti-angiogenesis. "( A Single Arm, Phase II Study of Simvastatin Plus XELOX and Bevacizumab as First-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Ahn, JB; Han, SW; Kang, WK; Kim, ST; Kim, TW; Kim, Y; Lee, J; Lim, HY; Park, JO; Park, YS, 2019
)
2.24
"Simvastatin has previously been found to be a potential degenerative disc disease treatment."( Multiple-Exposure Drug Release from Stable Nanodroplets by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for a Potential Degenerative Disc Disease Treatment.
C Park, Y; Haworth, K; Lin, CY; Mahoney, E; Mercado-Shekhar, KP; Nguyen, K; Pan, HY; Zhang, Z, 2019
)
1.24
"Simvastatin has been reported to increase the therapeutic effects of many kinds of stem cells by increasing the number of those cells. "( The effects of simvastatin on cellular viability, stemness and osteogenic differentiation using 3-dimensional cultures of stem cells and osteoblast-like cells.
Lee, H; Na, CB; Park, JB, 2019
)
2.31
"Simvastatin has recently been demonstrated to serve as a therapeutic agent for osteoporosis. "( Preparation of calcium phosphate nanocapsules including simvastatin/deoxycholic acid assembly, and their therapeutic effect in osteoporosis model mice.
Ito, T; Makino, K; Otsuka, M; Takemasa, M, 2013
)
2.08
"Simvastatin has been shown to stimulate osteogenic cell differentiation. "( Simvastatin enhances human osteoblast proliferation involved in mitochondrial energy generation.
Chang, JK; Chuang, SC; Ho, ML; Li, CJ; Liao, HJ; Wang, GJ, 2013
)
3.28
"Simvastatin has inhibitory effects on cancers. "( Simvastatin enhances the chemotherapeutic efficacy of S-1 against bile duct cancer: E2F-1/TS downregulation might be the mechanism.
Cai, JP; Chen, W; Hao, XY; Hou, X; Liang, LJ; Yin, XY, 2013
)
3.28
"Simvastatin has low aqueous solubility resulting in low oral bioavailability (5%) and thus presents a challenge in formulating a suitable dosage form. "( Preparation and characterization of Simvastatin solid dispersion using skimmed milk.
Banerjee, SK; Behera, AL; Gaikwad, DD; Harer, SL; Sonar, PA, 2015
)
2.13
"Simvastatin has important immune-modulatory and anti-inflammatory effects independent of lipid lowering effects. "( Effect of simvastatin on inflammatory cytokines balance in air pouch granuloma model.
Al-Gayyar, MM; El-Gayar, AM; Hassan, HM; Ibrahim, TM, 2014
)
2.25
"Simvastatin has shown potential wound-healing properties; however, no studies have investigated its use in venous ulcers."( Simvastatin as a novel therapeutic agent for venous ulcers: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Casintahan, MF; Evangelista, MT; Villafuerte, LL, 2014
)
2.57
"Simvastatin has been shown to possess potent anti-inflammatory properties."( Simvastatin reduces burn injury-induced splenic apoptosis via downregulation of the TNF-α/NF-κB pathway.
Bonab, AA; Fischman, AJ; Kaneki, M; Tompkins, RG; Yu, YM; Zhao, G, 2015
)
2.58
"Simvastatin has protective effects on retinal ischemia reperfusion injury, and the mechanism is closely related to inhibiting retinal cell apoptosis by adjusting the express of Bcl-2 and Bax."( [Effect of simvastatin on retinal Bcl-2/Bax expression and cell apoptosis in rats with ischemia-reperfusion injury].
Yan, H; Zhang, Y, 2014
)
2.23
"Simvastatin has been shown to prevent the development of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in experimental models of PH."( Prevention of pulmonary hypoplasia and pulmonary vascular remodeling by antenatal simvastatin treatment in nitrofen-induced congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
Da Costa, AM; de Medina, G; Dewachter, C; Dewachter, L; Hupkens, E; Makanga, M; Maruyama, H; Naeije, R, 2015
)
1.36
"Simvastatin has anti-inflammatory actions, including improvement of endothelial function, by inducing a novel pro-resolving lipid, the 5-lypoxygenase derivative 15-epi-lipoxin A4 (15-epi-LXA4), which belongs to aspirin-triggered lipoxins."( Simvastatin and Benznidazole-Mediated Prevention of Trypanosoma cruzi-Induced Endothelial Activation: Role of 15-epi-lipoxin A4 in the Action of Simvastatin.
Campos-Estrada, C; Ferreira, J; González-Herrera, F; Kemmerling, U; Lapier, M; Liempi, A; López-Muñoz, R; Maya, JD; Pesce, B, 2015
)
2.58
"Simvastatin has pleiotropic properties; it penetrates the brain and, as well as reducing cholesterol, reduces inflammation when used at clinically relevant doses over the short term."( Evaluating early administration of the hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin in the prevention and treatment of delirium in critically ill ventilated patients (MoDUS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Agus, A; Alce, TM; Casarin, A; Ely, EW; Jackson, JC; McAuley, DF; McDowell, C; Murphy, L; Page, VJ; Zhao, X, 2015
)
1.36
"Simvastatin has been shown to protect from renal IRI in several experimental studies."( Intensive perioperative simvastatin treatment protects from chronic kidney allograft injury.
Koskinen, PK; Palin, NK; Rintala, JM; Savikko, J, 2015
)
1.45
"Simvastatin has a protective effect against acute pancreatitis."( Acute pancreatitis.
Talukdar, R; Vege, SS, 2015
)
1.14
"Simvastatin (SV) has been reported to improve cognitive deficits in Alzheimer's disease. "( Simvastatin Enhances Spatial Memory and Long-Term Potentiation in Hippocampal CA1 via Upregulation of α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor.
Chen, L; Chen, T; Sha, S; Wang, C; Zhou, L, 2016
)
3.32
"Simvastatin has been recently demonstrated to have a neuroprotective effect in nervous system diseases."( Neuroprotective Effect of Simvastatin via Inducing the Autophagy on Spinal Cord Injury in the Rat Model.
Bi, J; Gao, K; Han, D; Li, H; Mei, X; Wan, Z; Wang, G; Wang, Y; Yao, T; Yuan, Y, 2015
)
1.44
"Simvastatin (SV) has been reported to improve dementia and slow progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD), however there are conflicting reports."( Dose-Dependent Neuroprotection and Neurotoxicity of Simvastatin through Reduction of Farnesyl Pyrophosphate in Mice Treated with Intracerebroventricular Injection of Aβ 1-42.
Cao, X; Chen, L; Chen, T; Jin, H; Li, G; Sha, S; Wan, Q; Wang, C; Zhang, B, 2016
)
2.13
"Simvastatin (SV) has been demonstrated to exert excellent anabolic effects on bone."( In vivo evaluation of a simvastatin-loaded nanostructured lipid carrier for bone tissue regeneration.
Lai, C; Niu, M; Wang, C; Wang, Z; Wu, W; Yue, X; Zhang, Q; Zhang, T; Zhou, L, 2016
)
1.46
"Simvastatin has a suppressing effect on LPS-induced inflammatory cytokine, cell adhesion molecules and NF-κB transcription factors in HDPCs. "( Simvastatin inhibits the expression of inflammatory cytokines and cell adhesion molecules induced by LPS in human dental pulp cells.
Choi, CH; Hwang, YC; Jung, JY; Kim, WJ; Koh, JT; Lee, BN; Lee, KJ; Min, KS; Nör, JE; Woo, SM, 2017
)
3.34
"Simvastatin has anti-inflammatory effects that could be of interest for asthma therapy."( Simvastatin requires activation in accessory cells to modulate T-cell responses in asthma and COPD.
Bendella, Z; Boyaci, N; Gallert, WJ; Grensemann, B; Jungck, D; Knobloch, J; Koch, A; Körber, S; Yakin, Y; Yanik, SD, 2016
)
2.6
"Simvastatin has lung vascular-protective effects via augmentation of endothelial barrier function. "( Simvastatin Attenuates Acute Lung Injury via Regulating CDC42-PAK4 and Endothelial Microparticles.
Gao, C; Jing, L; Yu, Y; Zhang, X, 2017
)
3.34
"Simvastatin has been demonstrated to promote bone formation and reduce bone adsorption."( Multiple drilling combined with simvastatin versus multiple drilling alone for the treatment of avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head: 3-year follow-up study.
Wang, D; Yin, H; Yuan, Z, 2016
)
1.44
"Simvastatin has been reported to exhibit antitumor activities in several cancers; however, its roles and molecular mechanismsin the regulation of colorectal angiogenesis remain to be clarified."( Simvastatin inhibits tumor angiogenesis in HER2-overexpressing human colorectal cancer.
Li, G; Ling, J; Qiu, W; Wang, Y; Xu, B; Zheng, J, 2017
)
2.62
"Simvastatin has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in preclinical studies via tumor cell senescence, anti-angiogenesis, and apoptosis. "( Simvastatin plus irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal patients: a multicenter phase II study.
Ahn, JB; Byun, JH; Hong, YS; Im, SA; Jung, KH; Kang, WK; Kim, TW; Lee, J; Lee, N; Lim, HY; Oh, DY; Park, JO; Park, SH; Park, YS; Shin, DB; Shin, SJ, 2009
)
3.24
"Simvastatin has the capacity to prevent endotoxemic liver injury by inhibiting leukocyte infiltration and hepatocellular apoptosis. "( Inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase reduces leukocyte recruitment and hepatocyte apoptosis in endotoxin-induced liver injury.
Laschke, MW; Menger, MD; Schilling, MK; Slotta, JE; Thorlacius, H; Wang, Y, 2009
)
1.8
"Simvastatin has antiinflammatory effects in the pulmonary and systemic compartment in humans exposed to inhaled LPS."( Simvastatin decreases lipopolysaccharide-induced pulmonary inflammation in healthy volunteers.
Backman, JT; Brown, V; Craig, TR; Elborn, JS; Matthay, MA; McAuley, DF; McKeown, ST; O'Kane, CM; Shyamsundar, M; Taggart, CC; Thickett, DR, 2009
)
3.24
"Simvastatin (SIM) has been found to have other clinical benefits besides those resulted from its actions of reducing plasma level of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol."( Effect of simvastatin on culturing of kidney cells from pigs in vitro.
Fu, J; Lin, H; Liu, G; Wang, A, 2010
)
1.48
"Simvastatin has been shown to ameliorate pulmonary hypertension by several mechanisms in experimental animal models. "( Simvastatin ameliorates established pulmonary hypertension through a heme oxygenase-1 dependent pathway in rats.
Chen, CF; Chen, JS; Hsu, HH; Hsu, JY; Ko, WJ; Lai, IR; Lee, YC, 2009
)
3.24
"Simvastatin has been reported to promote osteoblastic activity and inhibit osteoclastic activity."( The use of simvastatin in bone regeneration.
Park, JB, 2009
)
1.46
"Simvastatin may has a potential therapeutic target in diabetic nephropathy, which may be partly attributed to down-regulating over-expression of MMP-9 in renal tissue."( Simvastatin protects diabetic rats against kidney injury through the suppression of renal matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression.
Chen, K; Chen, Y; Li, XC; Wang, YX; Yang, GW; Yao, XM; Ye, SD; Zai, Z, 2010
)
3.25
"Simvastatin has an inhibitory effect on the differentiation and maturation of DC, and selectively reduce the T-cell proliferation induced by DC from patients with ON."( Increased immunopotency of monocyte derived dendritic cells from patients with optic neuritis is inhibited in vitro by simvastatin.
Frederiksen, J; Svane, IM; Tsakiri, A; Tsiantoulas, D, 2010
)
1.29
"Simvastatin has a dual effect on tumorigenesis. "( HMG-CoA reductase inhibition causes increased necrosis and apoptosis in an in vivo mouse glioblastoma multiforme model.
Bababeygy, SR; Hou, LC; Polevaya, NV; Prugpichailers, T; Steinman, L; Sun, A; Tse, V; Veeravagu, A; Xiong, A; Youssef, S, 2009
)
1.8
"Simvastatin has been reported to be effective on stimulation of bone formation. "( [Effects of simvastatin on bone formation relative factors of trabecular bone and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in young rats].
Han, D; Liu, X; Tian, F; Zhang, H; Zhang, L, 2011
)
2.19
"Simvastatin has been shown to enhance the survival of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) following ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury by mediating the expression of stress proteins. "( Simvastatin upregulates Bcl-2 expression and protects retinal neurons from early ischemia/reperfusion injury in the rat retina.
Chen, CF; Ko, ML; Peng, PH; Peng, YH, 2011
)
3.25
"Simvastatin has been shown to enhance osseointegration of pure titanium implants in osteoporotic rats. "( Serum bone formation marker correlation with improved osseointegration in osteoporotic rats treated with simvastatin.
Chen, J; Doan, N; Du, Z; Ivanovski, S; Xiao, Y; Yan, F, 2013
)
2.05
"Simvastatin has been shown to play an important role in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events caused by atherosclerosis. "( Simvastatin-induced myopathy with concomitant use of cyclosporine: case report.
Feng, GW; Li, YP; Ren, XW; Shang, WJ; Yang, WH; Zeng, ZS; Zhang, LR, 2011
)
3.25
"Simvastatin has been shown to stimulate new bone growth on rat mandibles, but much of the bone is lost over time. "( Impact of local and systemic alendronate on simvastatin-induced new bone around periodontal defects.
Killeen, AC; Marx, DB; Narayana, N; Payne, JB; Rakes, PA; Reinhardt, RA; Schmid, MJ; Wang, D; Zhang, Y, 2012
)
2.08
"Simvastatin has been clearly shown to decrease LDL-cholesterol, which is associated with the slowing of atherosclerosis and a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. "( The ezetimibe controversy - can this be resolved by comparing the clinical trials with simvastatin and ezetimibe alone and together?
Doggrell, SA, 2012
)
2.04
"Simvastatin has no clinically important effect on sitagliptin pharmacokinetics. "( The effects of simvastatin on the pharmacokinectics of sitagliptin.
Anderson, MS; Cerra, M; Li, SX; Luo, WL; Matthews, C; O'Neill, EA; Stoch, SA; Wagner, JA, 2012
)
2.17
"Simvastatin have been shown to induce bone formation and there is currently a urgent need to develop an appropriate delivery system to sustain the release of the drug to increase therapeutic efficacy whilst reducing side effects. "( Controlled release of simvastatin from biomimetic β-TCP drug delivery system.
Ben-Nissan, B; Bishop, D; Chou, J; Ito, T; Milthorpe, B; Otsuka, M, 2013
)
2.15
"Simvastatin has also been shown to abolish the progression, and even facilitate the regression, of existing human atherosclerotic lesions."( Benefits and risks of simvastatin in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
Alonso, R; Badimón, J; Mata, P, 2003
)
1.35
"Simvastatin has reported putative antifibrotic actions in renal fibroblasts; this study explores such actions on human IPF-derived and normal lung fibroblasts and examines associated driving mechanisms."( Connective tissue growth factor expression and induction by transforming growth factor-beta is abrogated by simvastatin via a Rho signaling mechanism.
Spiteri, MA; Watts, KL, 2004
)
1.26
"Simvastatin has been shown to inhibit endothelin-1."( Effect of simvastatin on left ventricular mass in hypercholesterolemic rabbits.
Chang, NC; Chou, TF; Lee, TM; Lin, MS, 2005
)
1.45
"Simvastatin has been studied in two large outcome trials, the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S), and the Heart Protection Study (HPS), both of which demonstrated strikingly beneficial effects on a variety of cardiovascular outcomes, with minimal adverse effects."( Simvastatin: a review.
Pedersen, TR; Tobert, JA, 2004
)
2.49
"Simvastatin has been shown to increase bone growth when applied topically to murine bone; however, it causes considerable soft tissue inflammation at high doses (2.2 mg), making future clinical use problematic. "( Local simvastatin effects on mandibular bone growth and inflammation.
Cullen, DM; Genrich, MA; Killpack, B; Lee, Y; Marx, DB; Narayana, N; Reinhardt, RA; Schmid, MJ; Stein, D, 2005
)
2.25
"Simvastatin has statistically significant effects on affect and affective processes in elderly volunteers. "( Simvastatin causes changes in affective processes in elderly volunteers.
Cary, M; Datto, C; DiFilippo, S; Katz, IR; Morales, K; TenHave, T; Wittink, M, 2006
)
3.22
"Simvastatin therapy has been proposed as a means to treat the CNS."( Development and characterization of a hypomorphic Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome mouse model and efficacy of simvastatin therapy.
Correa-Cerro, LS; Fliesler, SJ; Grinberg, A; Kratz, L; Miller, GF; Munasinghe, JP; Porter, FD; Wassif, CA, 2006
)
1.27
"Simvastatin acid (SVA) has been reported to stimulate bone formation with increased expression of BMP-2. "( Oxygen plasma surface modification enhances immobilization of simvastatin acid.
Hayakawa, T; Ide, T; Inoue, T; Matsuzaka, K; Oda, Y; Shimono, M; Tanaka, T; Yoshinari, M, 2006
)
2.02
"Simvastatin has a preventive effect on rat PH, it inhibits mast cell proliferation may be one of mechanism."( [The change of mast cells and macrophages in the lung of rat with pulmonary hypertension].
Dou, H; Li, P; Su, J; Zhang, T; Zhao, L; Zhao, Y; Zhou, TF, 2006
)
1.06
"Simvastatin has been shown in experimental models to stimulate bone acting growth factors and enhance bone formation."( The use of simvastatin in rabbit posterolateral lumbar intertransverse process spine fusion.
Bae, HW; Friess, D; Johnstone, B; Robbin, M; Roth, SM; Whyne, C; Yee, AJ; Yoo, JU,
)
1.24
"Simvastatin has been shown to restore endothelial function in children with familial hypercolesterolemia after 28 weeks of treatment. "( One-month therapy with simvastatin restores endothelial function in hypercholesterolemic children and adolescents.
Barros, MR; Bertolami, MC; Carvalho, AC; de Matos Barretto, RB; Ferreira, WP; Fonseca, FH; Pontes, SC; Santos, SN,
)
1.88
"Simvastatin acid (SVA) has been reported to stimulate bone formation by increasing expression of BMP-2 in osteoblasts. "( Controlled release of simvastatin acid using cyclodextrin inclusion system.
Hashimoto, S; Ide, T; Inoue, T; Ishihara, K; Matsuzaka, K; Oda, Y; Tanaka, T; Yoshinari, M, 2007
)
2.1
"Simvastatin has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease by 35% and overall mortality by up to 30% over 5 years."( Simvastatin: present and future perspectives.
Robinson, JG, 2007
)
2.5
"Simvastatin has a strong anti-inflammatory effect on HPBM cells including upregulation of the atheroprotective factor KLF-2. "( Simvastatin has an anti-inflammatory effect on macrophages via upregulation of an atheroprotective transcription factor, Kruppel-like factor 2.
Häkkinen, SK; Horrevoets, AJ; Kansanen, E; Levonen, AL; Lumivuori, H; Tuomisto, TT; Turunen, MP; van Thienen, JV; Ylä-Herttuala, S, 2008
)
3.23
"Simvastatin therapy has been demonstrated to significantly improve endothelial function in these patients."( Short-term withdrawal of simvastatin induces endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease: a dose-response effect dependent on endothelial nitric oxide synthase.
Chen, H; Liu, X; Luo, Y; Ren, JY; Wang, RJ; Wu, P; Xing, Y; Zhang, WL, 2009
)
1.38
"Simvastatin also has a preventive effect on the progression of preexisting CAs."( Simvastatin suppresses the progression of experimentally induced cerebral aneurysms in rats.
Aoki, T; Hashimoto, N; Ishibashi, R; Kataoka, H; Nozaki, K, 2008
)
2.51
"Simvastatin has potential application in diabetes-related wound healing disorders."( Simvastatin enhances VEGF production and ameliorates impaired wound healing in experimental diabetes.
Altavilla, D; Bitto, A; Bonaiuto, M; Calò, M; Caputi, AP; Fiumara, T; Galeano, M; Lo Cascio, P; Marini, H; Migliorato, A; Minutoli, L; Polito, F; Squadrito, F, 2008
)
2.51
"Simvastatin has the effect of anti-inflammation, which may play some protection against the progress of atherosclerosis in diabetic rats."( The effect of simvastatin on the serum monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and intracellular adhesion molecule-1 levels in diabetic rats.
Chen, Y; Fan, A; Li, X; Lin, Y; Wang, Y; Yang, GW; Ye, S,
)
1.93
"Simvastatin has been shown to stimulate osteogenesis both in vitro and in vivo. "( Simvastatin induces estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha) in murine bone marrow stromal cells.
Chen, Z; Dang, G; Jia, H; Li, X; Liu, Z; Ma, Q; Song, C; Song, Q; Wang, J, 2008
)
3.23
"Simvastatin treatment has been well tolerated by the patients."( [Simvastatin in the treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia].
Ceska, R; Kvasilová, M; Procházková, R; Sobra, J, 1995
)
1.92
"Simvastatin has also been shown to potentiate the effects of warfarin [corrected].(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)"( Clinical pharmacokinetics and practical applications of simvastatin.
Mauro, VF, 1993
)
1.25
"Simvastatin has a beneficial effect on abnormal lipid levels in SRNS but the effectiveness of long-term therapy needs to be evaluated."( Hyperlipidaemia, diet and simvastatin therapy in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome of childhood.
Coleman, JE; Watson, AR, 1996
)
1.32
"Simvastatin has this effect at doses of about half those of the other 3 statins."( Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Similarities and differences.
Fager, G; Lennernäs, H, 1997
)
1.02
"Simvastatin therapy has been shown to be cost-effective, decreasing per-patient hospitalization costs by 31% or $3,872 in 1995 dollars."( Coronary artery disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study experience.
Pedersen, TR, 1998
)
1.29
"Simvastatin (Zocor) has been linked to three cases of drug-induced lupus-like syndrome."( Simvastatin-induced lupus-like syndrome.
Ahmad, A; Fletcher, MT; Roy, TM, 2000
)
2.47
"Simvastatin 40 to 80 mg/d has been found to increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels significantly more than atorvastatin at equipotent doses (ie, 20-80 mg/d). "( Effects of low doses of simvastatin and atorvastatin on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Berra, C; Branchi, A; Colombo, E; Dalla Valle, E; Fiorenza, AM; Muzio, F; Rovellini, A; Sommariva, D; Torri, A, 2001
)
2.06
"2. Simvastatin has been studied for its effects on hepatic microsomal drug metabolism in rat."( Effects of simvastatin, a lipoprotein-lowering drug, on the hepatic enzymes involved in drug metabolism in the Wistar rat.
Escousse, A; Goudonnet, H; Mercenne, F; Mounie, J; Truchot, RC, 1991
)
1.19

Actions

Simvastatin could enhance protective autophagy by activating the AMPK-SKP2-CARM1 pathway to improve erectile function in diabetes mellitus-induced erectile dysfunction rats. Simvastin (SMV) could increase tooth anchorage during orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) Simvstatin can enhance theraprutic effect of many kinds of stem cells by increasing numbe.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Simvastatin plays an important role in reducing inflammation."( Simvastatin Improves Outcomes of Endotoxin-induced Coagulopathy by Regulating Intestinal Microenvironment.
Du, MY; Hu, Y; Luo, LL; Mei, H; Tang, L; Xu, M; Zhou, J, 2022
)
2.89
"Simvastatin could inhibit the metabolism of vonoprazan in vitro but multiple doses of simvastatin exhibited the opposite effect In vivo. "( Effects of Simvastatin on the Metabolism of Vonoprazan in Rats Both in vitro and in vivo.
Cai, JP; Dai, DP; Geng, PW; Hong, Y; Luo, QF; Shi, JH; Wang, SH; Wang, YR; Xu, X; Zhao, FL; Zhou, Q; Zhou, S; Zhou, YF, 2022
)
2.55
"Simvastatin may inhibit the progression of IL-33-induced inflammation via suppressing JNK to prevent MCP-1 production."( Inhibitory Effects of Simvastatin on IL-33-Induced MCP-1 via the Suppression of the JNK Pathway in Human Vascular Endothelial Cells.
Jougasaki, M; Sudou, K; Takenoshita, Y; Tokito, A; Umebashi, K; Yamamoto, M, 2023
)
1.95
"Simvastatin could enhance protective autophagy by activating the AMPK-SKP2-CARM1 pathway to improve erectile function in diabetes mellitus-induced erectile dysfunction rats."( Simvastatin alleviated diabetes mellitus-induced erectile dysfunction in rats by enhancing AMPK pathway-induced autophagy.
Dai, Q; Ding, F; Guo, C; Li, H; Ouyang, Q; Shan, C; Shen, W; Wu, X; Zhang, Y; Zheng, J; Zhou, Z, 2020
)
3.44
"Simvastatin can inhibit the HIF-1α/PPAR-γ/PKM2 axis, by suppressing PKM2-mediated glycolysis, resulting in decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis in HCC cells, and re-sensitizing HCC cells to Sora."( Simvastatin re-sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to sorafenib by inhibiting HIF-1α/PPAR-γ/PKM2-mediated glycolysis.
Chen, K; Dai, W; Feng, J; Guo, C; Ji, J; Kong, R; Li, J; Li, S; Mao, Y; Mo, W; Wu, J; Wu, L; Xu, X; Yu, Q; Zhang, J, 2020
)
3.44
"Simvastatin promotes myostatin expression in both skeletal muscle and brown adipose tissue through inhibiting GGPP production; 3."( Statins induce skeletal muscle atrophy via GGPP depletion-dependent myostatin overexpression in skeletal muscle and brown adipose tissue.
Chen, J; Li, P; Meng, L; Wang, L; Yang, H; Zheng, ZG; Zhu, L, 2021
)
1.34
"Simvastatin (SMV) could increase tooth anchorage during orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). "( Local delivery of simvastatin maintains tooth anchorage during mechanical tooth moving via anti-inflammation property and AMPK/MAPK/NF-kB inhibition.
Baban, B; Mao, J; Qin, X; Sun, X; Xu, L; Zhu, G, 2021
)
2.4
"The simvastatin can enhance the theraprutic effect of many kinds of stem cells by increasing number and function of the stem cell."( A new in vivo method to retard progression of intervertebral disc degeneration through stimulation of endogenous stem cells with simvastatin.
Bi, S; Chen, T; Feng, X; Huang, Z; Zhang, L, 2017
)
1.14
"Simvastatin tended to increase ceramide abundance, an effect, however, escaping statistical significance."( Simvastatin, a Novel Stimulator of Eryptosis, the Suicidal Erythrocyte Death.
Al Mamun Bhuyan, A; Cao, H; Lang, F; Nüßle, S; Zhang, S, 2017
)
2.62
"Simvastatin appeared to increase hepatic sinusoidal function and reduce portal hypertension and markers of inflammation and oxidation."( Simvastatin Prevents Progression of Acute on Chronic Liver Failure in Rats With Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension.
Bosch, J; Fernández-Iglesias, A; Garcia-Calderó, H; García-Pagán, JC; Gracia-Sancho, J; Lafoz, E; Rodrigues de Oliveira, J; Tripathi, DM; Viegas Haute, G; Vilaseca, M, 2018
)
2.64
"Simvastatin (SVS) promotes the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and has been studied for MSC-based bone regeneration. "( Alpha-5 Integrin Mediates Simvastatin-Induced Osteogenesis of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells.
Chen, CH; Ho, ML; Lin, ZY; Shao, PL; Wang, CZ; Wu, SC, 2019
)
2.26
"Simvastatin caused an increase in p53 phosphorylation and acetylation."( Simvastatin induced HCT116 colorectal cancer cell apoptosis through p38MAPK-p53-survivin signaling cascade.
Chang, HL; Chen, CY; Chiu, PT; Hsu, MJ; Hsu, YF; Huang, YH; Kuo, WS; Ou, G, 2013
)
2.55
"Simvastatin can delay and inhibit prostatic hyperplasia and progression in SHR. "( Influence and pathophysiological mechanisms of simvastatin on prostatic hyperplasia in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Dong, L; Qu, X; Shen, F; Zhang, X; Zhao, X, 2013
)
2.09
"Simvastatin can cause a marked decrease in plasma Hcy levels. "( Effect of simvastatin on plasma homocysteine levels and its modification by MTHFR C677T polymorphism in Chinese patients with primary hyperlipidemia.
Chen, Q; Hsu, YH; Jiang, S; Venners, SA; Wang, X; Xing, H; Xu, X; Zhong, G, 2013
)
2.23
"Simvastatin may inhibit VSMC phenotype modulation and proliferation by downregulating the expression of PCNA and upregulating that of p27kip1."( Simvastatin decreases stent-induced in-stent restenosis rate via downregulating the expression of PCNA and upregulating that of p27kip1.
Gao, C; Li, M; Xiao, W; Xu, W; Yu, J, 2013
)
3.28
"Simvastatin may inhibit inflammation by enhancing the switching of M1 macrophage to M2 macrophage phenotype."( [Anti-inflammation of simvastatin by polarization of murine macrophages from M1 phenotype to M2 phenotype].
Han, JJ; Li, QZ; Qian, ZJ; Sun, J, 2013
)
2.15
"Simvastatin could also inhibit the expression of NMDAR1 and cytokines to a degree similar to silencing of NMDAR1 with siRNA."( Simvastatin prevents neuroinflammation by inhibiting N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor 1 in 6-hydroxydopamine-treated PC12 cells.
Du, G; Fu, Q; Huang, L; Sun, J; Yan, J, 2014
)
2.57
"The simvastatin group had lower DLQI scores (P < 0·001) post-treatment."( Simvastatin as a novel therapeutic agent for venous ulcers: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Casintahan, MF; Evangelista, MT; Villafuerte, LL, 2014
)
2.33
"Simvastatin (SIM) can increase osteoblast activity and enhance osteogenesis. "( Synthesis and characterization of cationic polymeric nanoparticles as simvastatin carriers for enhancing the osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.
Fu, YC; Ho, ML; Jian, SC; Liu, PL; Wang, CK; Wang, CZ; Wang, YH, 2014
)
2.08
"Simvastatin was shown to activate a stress cascade, leading to the synthesis of 15-deoxy-12,14-PGJ2 (15d-PGJ2 ), in a p38- and COX-2-dependent manner. "( Autocrine secretion of 15d-PGJ2 mediates simvastatin-induced apoptotic burst in human metastatic melanoma cells.
Hohenegger, M; Höller, C; Künzl, M; Minichsdorfer, C; Wasinger, C; Zellner, M, 2014
)
2.11
"Simvastatin could increase expression of exon-IIC transcripts in stressed mice."( Alteration in the expression of exon IIC transcripts of brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene by simvastatin [correction of simvastain] in chronic mild stress in mice: a possible link with dopaminergic pathway.
Goyal, RK; Jhala, MK; Joshi, CG; Patel, AK; Rana, DG, 2014
)
1.34
"Simvastatin can inhibit proliferation of PASMC and cell cycle process. "( [Effect of NF-κB on proliferation of rat pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells inhibited by simvastatin].
Liu, HM; Liu, ZQ; Wang, XQ, 2015
)
2.08
"Simvastatin did not inhibit the relapse of tooth movement in rats, and there was no correlation between bone density and orthodontic relapse."( The effect of simvastatin on relapse of tooth movement and bone mineral density in rats measured by a new method using microtomography.
Amorim, RF; Chaves, SB; Ferreira, VM; Freitas, KM; Vieira, GM, 2015
)
2.22
"Simvastatin did, however, increase neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), endothelial NOS (eNOS) and AMPK α-subunit protein expression, and tended to increase total NOS activity, in FT but not ST muscles."( Statin-Induced Increases in Atrophy Gene Expression Occur Independently of Changes in PGC1α Protein and Mitochondrial Content.
Goodman, CA; Lee-Young, RS; McConell, GK; Pol, D; Russell, AP; Snow, RJ; Zacharewicz, E, 2015
)
1.14
"Simvastatin treatment promotes EAE clinical amelioration by inhibiting T cell proliferation and CNS infiltration by pathogenic Th1 and Th17 cells."( Simvastatin ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inhibiting Th1/Th17 response and cellular infiltration.
Câmara, NO; Cenedeze, MA; de Oliveira, DM; de Oliveira, EM; Ferrari, Mde F; Hiyane, MI; Pacheco-Silva, A; Peron, JP; Semedo, P, 2015
)
3.3
"Simvastatin did not increase survival of patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis."( Addition of Simvastatin to Standard Therapy for the Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding Does Not Reduce Rebleeding but Increases Survival in Patients With Cirrhosis.
Abraldes, JG; Albillos, A; Aracil, C; Bosch, J; Calleja, JL; Castellote, J; García-Pagán, JC; Genesca, J; Hernandez-Guerra, M; Rodriguez, M; Torres, F; Turnes, J; Villanueva, C, 2016
)
1.53
"Simvastatin can also inhibit the formation of other products, such as isoprenoids, conferring additional benefits to this drug, which include antiproliferative, anti-invasive and pro-apoptotic effects."( Modulating effect of simvastatin on the DNA damage induced by doxorubicin in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster.
Nepomuceno, JC; Orsolin, PC; Silva-Oliveira, RG, 2016
)
1.47
"Simvastatin reported to cause muscle cramps while fluticasone is well documented to cause oral candidiasis."( Exploring New Zealand prescription data using sequence symmetry analyses for predicting adverse drug reactions.
Chyou, TY; Nishtala, PS, 2017
)
1.18
"Simvastatin tends to cause deterioration in exercise-associated cardiorespiratory fitness and skeletal muscle mitochondrial content in adults with T2DM, which is blunted by vitamin D supplementation."( Vitamin D supplementation improves simvastatin-mediated decline in exercise performance: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.
Aggarwal, AN; Badal, D; Bhansali, A; Bhat, OM; Rastogi, A; Singla, M, 2017
)
2.17
"Simvastatin induced the increase of [Ca2+]i in K562 cells, fluorescent intensities were 43, 54, and 64, respectively."( [Simvastatin-induced apoptosis of K562 cells is mediated by endoplasmic reticulum stress].
Huang, WF; Liu, H; Liu, W; Xu, GQ; Yang, YC, 2008
)
1.98
"Simvastatin promotes detachment and EMP release by inhibiting prenylation, presumably via a caspase 8-dependent mechanism."( Simvastatin-induced endothelial cell detachment and microparticle release are prenylation dependent.
Abid-Hussein, MN; Böing, AN; Diamant, M; Hau, CM; Nieuwland, R; Sturk, A; Tushuizen, ME, 2008
)
2.51
"Simvastatin could inhibit K562 cell proliferation, and the inhibition rate was approximately 30% after treatment with 20 mumol/l simvastatin for 48 h. "( In vitro and in vivo study of cell growth inhibition of simvastatin on chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.
Chuan, LM; Hu, Q; Huang, B; Huang, WF; Liu, W; Xiao, DW; Xu, GQ; Yang, YC; Zeng, YL; Zhou, DA, 2008
)
2.03
"Simvastatin can inhibit CML cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, and its mechanisms might be involved in cell cycle regulation."( In vitro and in vivo study of cell growth inhibition of simvastatin on chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.
Chuan, LM; Hu, Q; Huang, B; Huang, WF; Liu, W; Xiao, DW; Xu, GQ; Yang, YC; Zeng, YL; Zhou, DA, 2008
)
2.03
"Simvastatin is shown to increase cancellous bone volume, bone formation rate, and cancellous bone compressive strength."( The use of simvastatin in bone regeneration.
Park, JB, 2009
)
1.46
"Simvastatin was shown to increase the expression of Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP-2), which is one of the most potent growth factors targeting bone formation."( Simvastatin locally applied from a biodegradable coating of osteosynthetic implants improves fracture healing comparable to BMP-2 application.
Haas, NP; Luttosch, F; Morawski, M; Pauly, S; Schmidmaier, G; Wildemann, B, 2009
)
2.52
"Simvastatin may inhibit cigarette smoke-induced small airway remodelling by reducing growth factor expression and inflammation."( Simvastatin attenuates experimental small airway remodelling in rats.
Chen, L; Feng, YL; Huang, XY; Liu, DS; Ou, XM; Uhal, BD; Wang, K; Wang, T; Wang, X; Wen, FQ, 2009
)
2.52
"Simvastatin-induced increase in clot permeability was associated only with age and decrease in CRP levels (R2 for the model = 0.61), while shortening of clot lysis time observed following simvastatin use was predicted only by reduction of triglycerides and CRP (R2 for the model = 0.62)."( Simvastatin increases clot permeability and susceptibility to lysis in patients with LDL cholesterol below 3.4 mmol/l.
Topór-Madry, R; Tracz, W; Undas, A, 2009
)
2.52
"Simvastatin induced an increase of caspase-3 activity and annexin V staining, and down-regulated the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway."( Effect of simvastatin on glioma cell proliferation, migration, and apoptosis.
Chopp, M; Jiang, H; Lu, D; Mahmood, A; Qu, C; Wu, H; Xiong, Y; Zhou, D, 2009
)
1.48
"Simvastatin plays a protective role in CSE-induced fibrinolytic malfunction."( Effects of simvastatin on cigarette smoke extract induced tissue-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression in human umbilical vein endothelial cells.
Hu, XY; Ma, YH; Wang, C; Yang, YH, 2009
)
1.46
"Simvastatin can inhibit the expression of bone absorptive factors induced by wear particles and may be used in the prevention and treatment of aseptic loosening of prosthesis."( [Experimental study on simvastatin in prevention and treatment of aseptic loosening of prosthesis].
Gao, X; Jin, Q; Sun, K; Wang, Z, 2010
)
1.39
"Simvastatin could also increase cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 protein expression (F = 512.133, P value less than 0.001)."( [Effects of simvastatin on the proliferation of HepG2 cells].
Liu, W; Zhang, LF; Zhang, YH, 2010
)
1.46
"Simvastatin can inhibit the growth of HepG2 cells in vitro, which may be explained by its effects of enhancing cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 protein expression and arresting HepG2 cells at G0/G1 phase of cell cycle."( [Effects of simvastatin on the proliferation of HepG2 cells].
Liu, W; Zhang, LF; Zhang, YH, 2010
)
2.18
"Simvastatin also promotes angiogenesis in vitro."( Induction of angiogenesis and modulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 by simvastatin after traumatic brain injury.
Chopp, M; Jiang, H; Lu, D; Mahmood, A; Qu, C; Wu, H; Xiong, Y; Zhou, D, 2011
)
1.31
"Simvastatin was found to suppress these H2O2-induced signaling pathways in osteoclastogenesis."( Simvastatin inhibits osteoclast differentiation by scavenging reactive oxygen species.
Bang, JB; Hwang, YS; Kim, SE; Kwon, IK; Moon, HJ; Park, JH; Yun, YP, 2011
)
2.53
"Simvastatin induced an increase in eNOS mRNA expression and protein levels in the presence of arginine or citrulline."( Arginine or citrulline associated with a statin stimulates nitric oxide production in bovine aortic endothelial cells.
Bernard, M; Berthe, MC; Couderc, R; Cynober, L; Darquy, S; Rasmusen, C, 2011
)
1.09
"Simvastatin is used to lower cholesterol and also exhibits antifungal action."( In vitro synergism of simvastatin and fluconazole against Candida species.
Cunha, FA; Cunha, Mda C; Menezes, EA; Plutarco, FX; Silva, CL; Vasconcelos Júnior, AA, 2012
)
1.41
"Simvastatin could inhibit the expression of CTGF in the vitreous body and retina in diabetic rats. "( [Effects of simvastatin on expression of connective tissue growth factor in vitreous and retina of diabetic rats].
Hu, YB; Liu, YM; Sun, ZY; Yan, H; Zhang, JK, 2012
)
2.2
"Simvastatin was found to inhibit increased ERK activation and Ki-67 expression in VSMCs subjected to stretch stress with or without oxLDL."( Simvastatin inhibits the additive activation of ERK1/2 and proliferation of rat vascular smooth muscle cells induced by combined mechanical stress and oxLDL through LOX-1 pathway.
Li, C; Li, Y; Liu, S; Ning, F; Ping, S; Wang, J; Xie, F; Zhang, M; Zhang, Z, 2013
)
2.55
"Simvastatin and tBHQ suppress KLF1 and BCL11 gene expression and additively increase fetal hemoglobin in primary human erythroid cells. "( Simvastatin and t-butylhydroquinone suppress KLF1 and BCL11A gene expression and additively increase fetal hemoglobin in primary human erythroid cells.
Lowrey, CH; Macari, ER; Schaeffer, EK; West, RJ, 2013
)
3.28
"Simvastatin promotes odontoblastic differentiation of hDPCs via the ERK signaling pathway. "( Combined effects of simvastatin and enamel matrix derivative on odontoblastic differentiation of human dental pulp cells.
Karanxha, L; Min, KS; Nör, JE; Park, SJ; Son, WJ, 2013
)
2.16
"Simvastatin plays a beneficial role in inflammatory arthritis through its up-regulation of SIRT-1/FoxO3a signaling in synovial fibroblasts."( Simvastatin inhibits cysteine-rich protein 61 expression in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts through the regulation of sirtuin-1/FoxO3a signaling.
Chang, CC; Hong, CY; Hou, KL; Hsiao, M; Kok, SH; Lai, EH; Lin, LD; Lin, SK; Wang, JH, 2013
)
2.55
"Simvastatin can enhance the amount and function of EPC from bone marrow in diabetic rats in a dose-dependent manner."( [Effect of simvastatin on the amount and function of endothelial progenitor cells from bone marrow in diabetic rats].
Chen, S; Han, Q; Yan, H; Zhang, W, 2012
)
2.21
"Simvastatin could inhibit ox-LDL-induced ER stress and reduce the expression of TNF-α and MCP-1 at mRNA and protien level in dose dependent manner."( Simvastatin inhibits ox-LDL-induced inflammatory adipokines secretion via amelioration of ER stress in 3T3-L1 adipocyte.
Chen, YQ; Wu, ZH; Zhao, SP, 2013
)
2.55
"Simvastatin induced an increase in the levels of mRNA for HSP27."( Mechanism of simvastatin on induction of heat shock protein in osteoblasts.
Hatakeyama, D; Hirade, K; Ito, H; Kato, K; Kozawa, O; Niwa, M; Tokuda, H; Wang, X, 2003
)
1.41
"Oral simvastatin might inhibit inflammatory components of multiple sclerosis that lead to neurological disability."( Oral simvastatin treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Corboy, J; Durkalski, V; Key, L; Markovic-Plese, S; Preiningerova, J; Rizzo, M; Singh, I; Tyor, W; Vollmer, T, 2004
)
1.29
"Simvastatin does not lower the triglycerides level through depression of liver protein syntesis, other mechanisms being probably involved."( The effect of Simvastatin upon serum pseudocholinesterase and plasmatic factor VII.
Bodizs, G; Oprea, M; Predescu, D; Zdrenghea, D; Zdrenghea, M, 2002
)
2.12
"Simvastatin displays significant antimyeloma activity in vitro. "( Simvastatin induces death of multiple myeloma cell lines.
Drucker, L; Gronich, N; Lishner, M; Radnay, J; Shapiro, H; Yarkoni, S, 2004
)
3.21
"Simvastatin failed to inhibit activation of these signaling pathways."( Simvastatin inhibits MMP-9 secretion from human saphenous vein smooth muscle cells by inhibiting the RhoA/ROCK pathway and reducing MMP-9 mRNA levels.
Ball, SG; O'Regan, DJ; Porter, KE; Turner, NA, 2005
)
2.49
"Simvastatin did not cause morphologic changes or cytotoxicity in the fibroblasts, even after 4 days of treatment. "( Inhibition of systemic sclerosis dermal fibroblast type I collagen production and gene expression by simvastatin.
Fertala, J; Huaman, G; Jiménez, SA; Louneva, N, 2006
)
1.99
"Simvastatin induced an increase in blood velocity and blood flow in retinal arteries and veins, increased the plasma nitrite/nitrate levels, and decreased the intraocular pressure, probably through the increase in nitric oxide."( Effect of systemic administration of simvastatin on retinal circulation.
Hein, TW; Izumi, N; Kuo, L; Nagaoka, T; Sato, E; Takahashi, A; Yoshida, A, 2006
)
2.05
"Simvastatin induced an increase in blood velocity and blood flow in retinal arteries and veins, increased the plasma nitrite/nitrate levels, and decreased the intraocular pressure, probably through the increase in nitric oxide."( The manifold actions of statins. Comment on "Effects of systemic administration of simvastatin on retinal circulation, by T. Nagaoka, A. Takahashi, E. Sato, et al. Arch Ophthalmol 124:665-70, 2006.
Arroyo, JG,
)
1.8
"Simvastatin was found to inhibit growth, and this was associated with lower ergosterol levels."( Simvastatin reduces ergosterol levels, inhibits growth and causes loss of mtDNA in Candida glabrata.
Macreadie, IG; Westermeyer, C, 2007
)
2.5
"Simvastatin does not enhance endothelial function in subjects with elevated ADMA, whereas it does so in patients with low ADMA. "( Asymmetric dimethylarginine determines the improvement of endothelium-dependent vasodilation by simvastatin: Effect of combination with oral L-arginine.
Benndorf, RA; Bierend, A; Böger, GI; Böger, RH; Dumbadze, E; Maas, R; Rudolph, TK; Schwedhelm, E, 2007
)
2
"Simvastatin can inhibit ET-1 expression in endothelial cell cultured hypoxically."( [Effect of simvastatin on endothelin-1 expression in endothelial cell cultured hypoxically].
Chen, XJ; Cheng, DY; Su, QL; Xia, XQ; Yang, L, 2008
)
2.18
"Simvastatin did not inhibit development of atheroma."( Development and progression of atherosclerosis in aorta from heterozygous and homozygous WHHL rabbits. Effects of simvastatin treatment.
Dowell, FJ; Hamilton, CA; Lindop, GB; Reid, JL, 1995
)
1.22
"Simvastatin was found to produce significantly greater mean percent reductions from baseline in total cholesterol (28% versus 21%), LDL cholesterol (38% versus 29%), and apolipoprotein B concentrations (25% versus 17%) than did pravastatin, and a greater percentage of patients receiving simvastatin (94% versus 80%) had at least a 20% reduction in LDL cholesterol."( Efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin 20 mg vs pravastatin 20 mg in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. European Study Group.
Lambrecht, LJ; Malini, PL, 1993
)
1.3
"Simvastatin promotes more effective reduction in cholesterol and apoB in LDL than in VLDL, probably by increasing the hepatic LDL receptor which preferentially binds LDL."( Effects of simvastatin on the number and composition of apoproteinB-containing lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemia: analysis of apoproteinB in each lipoprotein fraction by highly sensitive latex method.
Harano, Y; Ikeda Ryomoto, K; Suzuki, M; Tsushima, M; Yamamoto, A, 1996
)
1.41
"Simvastatin inhibited the increase of NA-induced increase of RNA content and [(3)H]-leucine incorporation in a concentration-dependent manner."( Simvastatin inhibits noradrenaline-induced hypertrophy of cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes.
Chen, X; Guan, JX; Luo, JD; Ma, XD; Xie, F; Zhang, WW, 2001
)
2.47
"Simvastatin induced an increase in cytosolic calcium ([Ca(2+)](i)) in BAEC, by releasing Ca(2+) from intracellular stores sensitive to thapsigargin and ryanodine, and increasing Ca(2+) entry."( Simvastatin and Ca(2+) signaling in endothelial cells: involvement of rho protein.
Alvarez de Sotomayor, M; Andriantsitohaina, R, 2001
)
2.47
"Simvastatin promotes intracellular antioxidant systems, fundamentally SOD, restoring endothelial function but not having any effect on blood pressure."( Simvastatin improves endothelial function in spontaneously hypertensive rats through a superoxide dismutase mediated antioxidant effect.
Alvarez de Sotomayor, M; Bravo, L; Carneado, J; Herrera, MD; Jimenez, L; Marhuenda, E; Martin-Sanz, MD; Miranda, M; Pamies, E; Perez-Guerrero, C; Stiefel, P, 2002
)
3.2
"Simvastatin can also inhibit in vitro the rate of human glioma cell growth, since it shows a strong synergistic inhibitory effect on cell proliferation whe"( Cholesterol and mevalonic acid modulation in cell metabolism and multiplication.
Corsini, A; Paoletti, R; Soma, MR, 1992
)
1
"Simvastatin did not cause any subjective or objective side effects, while cholestyramine caused gastrointestinal problems in 31% of patients."( Comparative effects of simvastatin and cholestyramine in treatment of patients with hypercholesterolaemia.
Mölgaard, J; Olsson, AG; von Schenck, H, 1989
)
1.31

Treatment

Simvastatin treatment increased plasma NO(2+NO(3) without affecting endothelial function, heart weight index, and blood pressure of control rats. Treatment reduced right ventricular hypertrophy and reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis of pathological smooth muscle cells in the neointima and medial walls of pulmonary arteries.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Simvastatin treatment markedly enhanced SOD activity and reduced contents of MDA, LDH, and creatine kinase (CK) in MIRI rats. "( Simvastatin Improves Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion Injury through KLF-Regulated Alleviation of Inflammation.
Fu, G; Huang, C; Huang, G; Li, J; Wei, T; Xu, J; Zhao, H; Zhu, X, 2022
)
3.61
"Simvastatin treatment reduced the inflammation score, cytokine levels, total cells, and neutrophil counts in the BALF and reduced proportions of Th2 and Th17 but increased Treg cells in lungs of OVA+LPS mice."( Simvastatin Reduces NETosis to Attenuate Severe Asthma by Inhibiting PAD4 Expression.
Chen, YR; Liu, D; Peng, B; Sun, F; Xiang, XD; Xiao, BW; Yan, MY, 2023
)
3.07
"Simvastatin-treated patients showed lower plasma cholesterol (P < .0001), low-density lipoprotein (P < .0001), and triglyceride levels (P = .0116) than controls. "( Effect of Simvastatin Treatment on Mitochondrial Function and Inflammatory Status of Human White Adipose Tissue.
Blom, I; Christensen, IB; Dela, F; Dohlmann, TL; Finger, F; Gerhart-Hines, Z; Helge, JW; Larsen, S, 2023
)
2.76
"Simvastatin treatment was linked to mitochondrial respiratory capacity in human subcutaneous white adipose tissue, but no clear link was found between statin exposure, respiratory changes, and inflammatory status of adipose tissue."( Effect of Simvastatin Treatment on Mitochondrial Function and Inflammatory Status of Human White Adipose Tissue.
Blom, I; Christensen, IB; Dela, F; Dohlmann, TL; Finger, F; Gerhart-Hines, Z; Helge, JW; Larsen, S, 2023
)
2.76
"Simvastatin treatment significantly opposed testosterone's effect on all aforementioned parameters."( Simvastatin ameliorates testosterone-induced prostatic hyperplasia in rats via modulating IGF-1/PI3K/AKT/FOXO signaling.
El-Shafei, NH; Kandil, EA; Sayed, RH; Zaafan, MA, 2023
)
3.07
"In simvastatin-treated ccRCC cells, although RhoA was upregulated, it was mainly restrained in the cytosolic fraction and concomitantly reduced Rho-associated protein kinase activity."( Tumoricidal Activity of Simvastatin in Synergy with RhoA Inactivation in Antimigration of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Cells.
Chou, FN; Chou, HC; Fann, YC; Juan, SH; Ko, TL; Lee, YG; Tung, SY, 2023
)
1.73
"Simvastatin treatment in HCT116 and SW620 induced pyroptosis and suppressed cell proliferation, with changes in the expression level of NLPR3, ASC, cleaved-caspase-1, mature IL-1β, IL-18 and GSDMD-N. "( Simvastatin induces pyroptosis via ROS/caspase-1/GSDMD pathway in colon cancer.
Liu, Y; Long, Y; Peng, M; Xie, W; Yi, L; Zhang, B, 2023
)
3.8
"Simvastatin treatment reduced chondrocyte dedifferentiation induced by retinoic acid or serial monolayer culturing by 50% compared to that in the non-treated cells."( Simvastatin induces differentiation in rabbit articular chondrocytes via Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
Han, Y; Kim, SJ; Yu, SM, 2019
)
2.68
"Simvastatin-treated cells reduced phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase down to 26%-60% of control, whereas it increased total focal adhesion kinase protein expression."( Simvastatin ameliorates altered mechanotransduction in uterine leiomyoma cells.
Afrin, S; Borahay, MA; Catherino, WH; Islam, MS; Malik, M; Patzkowsky, K; Segars, JH, 2020
)
2.72
"Simvastatin-treated rats that survived to sepsis showed a reduction in the levels of nitrate, IL1-β, and IL-6 and an increase in Bcl-2 protein expression in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, and synaptophysin only in the hippocampus."( Simvastatin Prevents Long-Term Cognitive Deficits in Sepsis Survivor Rats by Reducing Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration.
Alberici, LC; Cárnio, EC; Catalão, CHR; da Costa, LHA; Rocha, MJA; Santos-Junior, NN; Sebollela, A; Souza, AO, 2020
)
2.72
"Simvastatin treatment lead to significantly reduced viability of NPC cells and the number of cell colonies dose-dependently and time-dependently. "( Simvastatin induces apoptosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells through NF-κB signaling pathway.
Sun, FR; Sun, LM; Wang, M; Wang, SL, 2020
)
3.44
"Simvastatin (SV) treatment also alleviated LDL-induced cell viability and migration ability in both the prostate and pancreatic tumor cells."( LDL cholesterol promotes the proliferation of prostate and pancreatic cancer cells by activating the STAT3 pathway.
Ahn, KS; Alharbi, SA; Chinnathambi, A; Jung, YY; Ko, JH; Sethi, G; Um, JY, 2021
)
1.34
"Simvastatin treatment improved hemodynamic condition, myocardial tissue remodeling, and myocardial energy metabolism, as well as increasing calmodulin expression in rats with PAH-induced RHF."( Simvastatin protects heart function and myocardial energy metabolism in pulmonary arterial hypertension induced right heart failure.
Kang, P; Tang, B; Wang, H; Wang, X; Xu, J; Xuan, L; Zhang, H; Zhu, L, 2021
)
2.79
"Simvastatin treatment, in a dose-related manner, markedly improved the lung histological injury and decreased the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and increased IL-10 in LPS induced ALI."( Simvastatin attenuates acute lung injury by activation of A2B adenosine receptor.
Cai, SH; Gao, Y; Li, HX; Liang, XY; Wu, JH; Yuan, YP, 2021
)
2.79
"Simvastatin treatment increases circulating EPCs and inhabits the formation of ICA."( Simvastatin increases circulating endothelial progenitor cells and inhibits the formation of intracranial aneurysms in rats with diet-induced hyperhomocysteinemia.
Chen, Y; Dong, H; Li, Y; Wang, S; Wang, X; Wu, J; Xu, Y; Zhang, B, 2021
)
2.79
"Simvastatin treatment in animals feed with HFD showed a significant improvement of all tested parameters, but it was associated with hepatotoxicity, myopathy, and histological changes in quadriceps muscles."( Therapeutic advancement of simvastatin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SV-SLNs) in treatment of hyperlipidemia and attenuating hepatotoxicity, myopathy and apoptosis: Comprehensive study.
Abdelsalam, RM; Abo-Zalam, HB; El-Denshary, ES; Hamzawy, MA; Khalil, IA; Khattab, MM, 2021
)
1.64
"Simvastatin treatment in healthy, middle-aged adults resulted in preserved WM microstructure and volume at 18 months. "( Effects of simvastatin on white matter integrity in healthy middle-aged adults.
Adluru, N; Asthana, S; Austin, BP; Bendlin, BB; Carlsson, CM; Chappell, RJ; Hunt, JFV; Jacobson, LE; Johnson, SC; Lazar, KK; Ma, Y; Van Hulle, CA; Vogt, NM, 2021
)
2.45
"Simvastatin treatment significantly reduced LDL-C, TG and plasma inflammatory mediator levels in CHD patients."( Impact of matrix metalloproteinase 9 rs3918242 genetic variant on lipid-lowering efficacy of simvastatin therapy in Chinese patients with coronary heart disease.
Li, X; Qi, L; Wang, Y; Xu, Y; Zhang, T; Zhi, J, 2017
)
1.4
"Simvastatin treatment reduced the mRNA levels of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 by approximately 50% in TNF-α-stimulated IEC-6 cells."( Anti-inflammatory effects of simvastatin in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-induced small bowel injury.
Cho, JH; Chung, JW; Jeong, AR; Kim, EJ; Kim, EK; Kim, JH; Kim, KO; Kim, YJ; Kwon, KA; Park, DK, 2017
)
1.47
"Simvastatin treatment could significantly decrease lipid accumulation in murine podocytes and this protective effect was realized through inhibition of the expression of CXCL16 and increase in the expression of nephrin."( Effect of Simvastatin on Lipid Accumulation and the Expression of CXCL16 and Nephrin in Podocyte Induced by Oxidized LDL.
Li, Q; Sun, S; Wang, L; Yao, X, 2018
)
2.33
"Simvastatin treatment exerts antiproliferative and differentiating effects on these cells as well as promoting recovery of cellular homeostasis."( Simvastatin exerts antiproliferative and differentiating effects on MG63 osteoblast-like cells: Morphological and immunocytochemical study.
Fernández-Barbero, JE; Galindo-Moreno, P; Magan-Fernandez, A; Mesa, F; O' Valle, F; Ortiz, R, 2018
)
2.64
"Simvastatin treatment significantly inhibited cell viability and clonal proliferation in a dose-dependent manner."( Concurrent treatment with simvastatin and NF-κB inhibitor in human castration-resistant prostate cancer cells exerts synergistic anti-cancer effects via control of the NF-κB/LIN28/let-7 miRNA signaling pathway.
Jeong, CW; Kang, M; Kim, HH; Ku, JH; Kwak, C; Lee, HS; Lee, KH, 2017
)
1.48
"The simvastatin treated group showed shortening and loss of the tubercles and disappearance of the spines with swelling and twisted shape of the worms."( Simvastatin exerts antifibrotic effect and potentiates the antischistosomal effects of praziquantel in a murine model: Role of IL10.
Aboulfotouh, N; Aladeeb, NM; Elkaref, A; Elmasry, A, 2017
)
2.38
"Both simvastatin treatment arms suppressed indices of HDM-induced airway inflammation and goblet cell hyperplasia, but this was significantly greater with prophylactic therapy, in particular, inhibition of neutrophil and eosinophil influx, and cytokine accumulation."( Prophylactic benefits of systemically delivered simvastatin treatment in a house dust mite challenged murine model of allergic asthma.
Basu, S; Bews, HJ; Carlson, JC; Halayko, AJ; Jha, A; Oo, O; Ryu, MH; Schwartz, J; Wong, CS, 2018
)
1.19
"The simvastatin-treated groups were treated with different doses of simvastatin i.p."( Simvastatin protects against acetaminophen-induced liver injury in mice.
Cui, R; Feng, Y; Liang, H; Liu, C; Qiu, M; Zhang, J, 2018
)
2.4
"Simvastatin treatment was not associated with higher 3-month abstinence or smoking reduction compared to placebo."( Lack of effects of simvastatin on smoking cessation in humans: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study.
Dugast, E; Ingrand, I; Ingrand, P; Lafay-Chebassier, C; Pérault-Pochat, MC; Saulnier, PJ; Solinas, M, 2018
)
1.53
"Simvastatin treatment decreased Cav-1 (p<0.05) and increased eNOS expression (p<0.01) in the AAA wall."( Lower levels of Caveolin-1 and higher levels of endothelial nitric oxide synthase are observed in abdominal aortic aneurysm patients treated with simvastatin.
Bolliger, M; Domenig, C; Habrowska-Górczyńska, DE; Huk, I; Kowalska, K; Neumayer, C; Piastowska-Ciesielska, AW; Piechota-Polanczyk, A, 2018
)
1.4
"Simvastatin and Ezetimibe treatment impeded the progression of the time-related increase in plasma suPAR levels. "( Effect of simvastatin and ezetimibe on suPAR levels and outcomes.
Bang, CN; Boman, K; Eugen-Olsen, J; Forman, JL; Greve, AM; Hodges, GW; Jeppesen, JL; Kesäniemi, YA; Olsen, MH; Ray, S; Wachtell, K, 2018
)
2.33
"Simvastatin treatment (0.1, 0.5, and 2.5 μmol/L) blunted ox-LDL-induced expression of PERK (407.8%, 339.1%, and 187.5%, F = 10.121, all P < 0.05, compared with control group) and phosphorylation of eIF2α (407.8%, 339.1%, 187.5%, F = 11.430, all P < 0.05, compared with control group)."( Inhibitory Effects of Simvastatin on Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein-Induced Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Apoptosis in Vascular Endothelial Cells.
Bai, YP; Tao, YK; Yan, ST; Zhang, GQ; Zhao, SP, 2018
)
1.52
"Simvastatin treatment is cardioprotective in patients undergoing noncoronary artery cardiac surgery. "( Simvastatin Treatment Protects Myocardium in Noncoronary Artery Cardiac Surgery by Inhibiting Apoptosis Through miR-15a-5p Targeting.
Cheng, TP; Jian, YP; Li, HM; Li, Y; Liu, C; Liu, X; Ou, JS; Ou, ZJ; Quon, MJ; Shi, MM; Wang, ZP; Wang, ZQ; Xu, YQ; Xu, Z; Zhang, CX; Zhang, W; Zhang, X; Zhou, L, 2018
)
3.37
"Simvastatin treatment reduced serum cholesterol levels by 18% and retinal content of cholesterol and lathosterol (but not desmosterol) by 24% and 21%, respectively."( Retinal Cholesterol Content Is Reduced in Simvastatin-Treated Mice Due to Inhibited Local Biosynthesis Albeit Increased Uptake of Serum Cholesterol.
Bederman, IR; Mast, N; Pikuleva, IA, 2018
)
1.47
"Simvastatin pretreatment significantly decreased the values of the transaminases alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase and improved histological alterations according to improved Suzuki's Score (P < 0.05). "( Simvastatin ameliorates total liver ischemia/reperfusion injury via KLF2-mediated mechanism in rats.
Huang, X; Lai, CH; Li, L; Liu, Z; Luo, J; Qi, X; Senninger, N; Wang, W; Wang, Y; Xiaoli, F; Xiong, Y; Ye, Q; Ye, S; Zhang, X; Zhong, Z, 2019
)
3.4
"Simvastatin pretreatment ameliorates total hepatic IRI via a KLF2-mediated protective mechanism. "( Simvastatin ameliorates total liver ischemia/reperfusion injury via KLF2-mediated mechanism in rats.
Huang, X; Lai, CH; Li, L; Liu, Z; Luo, J; Qi, X; Senninger, N; Wang, W; Wang, Y; Xiaoli, F; Xiong, Y; Ye, Q; Ye, S; Zhang, X; Zhong, Z, 2019
)
3.4
"Simvastatin treatment mitigated periapical bone loss and reduced the activities of apoptosis and mitophagy in regional osteoblasts."( Simvastatin alleviates bone resorption in apical periodontitis possibly by inhibition of mitophagy-related osteoblast apoptosis.
Chang, JZ; Chen, MH; Hong, CY; Kok, SH; Lai, EH; Lin, SK; Shun, CT; Wang, HW; Yang, CN; Yang, H, 2019
)
2.68
"The simvastatin-PRP gel treatment promotes wounded tendon-bone interface healing in clinical treatment."( Simvastatin With PRP Promotes Chondrogenesis of Bone Marrow Stem Cells In Vitro and Wounded Rat Achilles Tendon-Bone Interface Healing In Vivo.
Hua, Y; Yu, J; Zhang, J; Zhang, Y, 2019
)
2.44
"In simvastatin-treated C2C12 myotubes, mRNA and protein expression of the insulin receptor (IR) β-chain was increased, but the phosphorylation (Tyr1361) was impaired."( Mechanisms of insulin resistance by simvastatin in C2C12 myotubes and in mouse skeletal muscle.
Bouitbir, J; Krähenbühl, S; Panajatovic, MV; Sanvee, GM, 2019
)
1.3
"Simvastatin treatment resulted in up-regulation of IRBP and its upstream transcription factor CRX in Y79 cells, ex vivo human retinal explants, and murine retinas in vivo."( Simvastatin protects photoreceptors from oxidative stress induced by all-trans-retinal, through the up-regulation of interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein.
Bahrami, B; Gillies, M; Murray, M; Shen, W; Wang, K; Wang, Y; Yao, W; Zeng, S; Zhang, T; Zhou, F; Zhu, L; Zhu, M, 2019
)
2.68
"Simvastatin and SimNP treated cells showed significantly greater expression of osteopontin (OPN) and osteocalcin (OCN)."( Locally Applied Simvastatin as an Adjunct to Promote Spinal Fusion in Rats.
Cunningham, ME; Donnelly, PE; Iyer, S; Oh, K; Spaniel, G; Young, K, 2019
)
1.58
"Simvastatin treatment was able to significantly reduce hepatic damage enzymes and hepatic lipids and lower the degree of hepatocellular ballooning, without showing genotoxic effects. "( Simvastatin Reduces Hepatic Oxidative Stress and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Experimental Model.
Bona, S; Di Naso, FC; Dias, AS; Marroni, CA; Marroni, NP; Moreira, AJ; Picada, JN; Pires, TR; Rodrigues, G; Schemitt, E, 2019
)
3.4
"Simvastatin treatment in T2D patients selectively reduced serum Ca levels and urinary Mg levels."( Associations of serum and urinary magnesium with the pre-diabetes, diabetes and diabetic complications in the Chinese Northeast population.
Cai, L; Sun, W; Xu, J; Xu, W; Yao, H; Zhou, Q, 2013
)
1.11
"Simvastatin-treated patients with AAA exert lower CyPA messenger RNA (mRNA), as well as CyPA intracellular protein levels and a decreased amount of phospho-ERK1/2. "( Decreased tissue levels of cyclophilin A, a cyclosporine a target and phospho-ERK1/2 in simvastatin patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Demyanets, S; Domenig, CM; Huk, I; Klinger, M; Mittlboeck, M; Nanobachvili, J; Neumayer, C; Nykonenko, O; Piechota-Polanczyk, A; Wojta, J, 2013
)
2.05
"Simvastatin treatment alone reduced constitutive Cx43 levels and prevented the TNF-α-induced IL-18 up-regulation."( Simvastatin attenuates the additive effects of TNF-α and IL-18 on the connexin 43 up-regulation and over-proliferation of cultured aortic smooth muscle cells.
Chang, LT; Chiang, CH; Chua, S; Chung, SY; Hsieh, MC; Kao, YH; Leu, S; Lin, YC; Shao, PL; Sun, CK; Tsai, TH; Yip, HK, 2013
)
2.55
"Simvastatin treatment prevented both skin thickness and pulmonary fibrosis."( Simvastatin attenuates the development of pulmonary and cutaneous fibrosis in a murine model of systemic sclerosis.
Altavilla, D; Bagnato, G; Bitto, A; Cinquegrani, M; Irrera, N; Matucci Cerinic, M; Pizzino, G; Roberts, WN; Saitta, A; Sangari, D; Squadrito, F, 2013
)
2.55
"Simvastatin treatment (5 mg/kg/day, i.p.) was applied for three consecutive days, starting 1 day before cadmium administration."( Simvastatin treatment ameliorates injury of rat testes induced by cadmium toxicity.
Albuali, WH; Fouad, AA; Jresat, I, 2013
)
2.55
"Simvastatin-treated fibroblasts had a significant decrease in myofibroblast production along with decreased cellular proliferation, migration, and MMP-9 activity but increased caspase 3 activity suggesting increased apoptosis."( Simvastatin reduces venous stenosis formation in a murine hemodialysis vascular access model.
Bhattacharya, S; Janardhanan, R; Kong, H; Leof, EB; Mandrekar, J; Misra, S; Mukhopadhyay, D; Roy, B; Vohra, P; Withers, S; Yang, B, 2013
)
2.55
"The simvastatin-treated groups presented reduced body weight and mean BP (trained+simvastatin = 99 ± 2 and sedentary+simvastatin = 107 ± 2 mmHg) compared to the sedentary group (122 ± 1 mmHg)."( Pleiotropic effects of simvastatin in physically trained ovariectomized rats.
Belló-Klein, A; Bernardes, N; Brito, JO; De Angelis, K; Fernandes, TG; Irigoyen, MC; Llesuy, SF, 2013
)
1.18
"Simvastatin-treated HL-1 cells exhibited mitochondrial translocation of Parkin and p62/SQSTM1, fission, and mitophagy."( Mitophagy is required for acute cardioprotection by simvastatin.
Andres, AM; Damasco, MV; Gottlieb, RA; Hernandez, G; Huang, C; Lee, P; Ratliff, EP; Sin, J; Thornton, CA, 2014
)
1.37
"Simvastatin-treated femurs contained fewer adipocytes and a higher Runx2 expression."( Local injection of a single dose of simvastatin augments osteoporotic bone mass in ovariectomized rats.
Cui, Y; Fu, X; Han, X; Leng, H; Song, C; Tan, J; Yang, N, 2014
)
1.4
"Simvastatin treatment led to accumulation of cytosolic LDs within the examined cells, a phenomenon which might contribute to the antiproliferative effects of statins."( The effect of simvastatin on lipid droplets accumulation in human embryonic kidney cells and pancreatic cancer cells.
Böhmer, D; Gbelcová, H; Kolář, M; Laubertová, L; Ruml, T; Strnad, H; Svéda, M; Varga, I; Vítek, L; Zelenka, J, 2013
)
2.19
"Simvastatin treatments resulted in decreased cell viabilities in various TNBC cell lines."( Statin induces inhibition of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells via PI3K pathway.
Ahn, JS; Im, YH; Jung, HH; Park, YH, 2013
)
1.11
"Simvastatin treatment in T2D patients had no significant effect on serum and urinary copper and zinc."( Analysis of serum and urinal copper and zinc in Chinese northeast population with the prediabetes or diabetes with and without complications.
Cai, L; Liu, G; Tan, Y; Xu, J; Zhou, Q, 2013
)
1.11
"Simvastatin treatment reduced systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction induced by periodontitis. "( The effect of simvastatin on systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction induced by periodontitis.
Costa, TP; Fávero, GM; Fernandes, D; Machado, WM; Mendes, RT; Olchanheski, LR; Otuki, MF; Prestes, AP; Santos, FA; Sordi, R; Vellosa, JC, 2014
)
2.21
"Simvastatin treatment, in addition to the improvement on serum lipid profile, may reduce other predictors of cardiovascular events associated with periodontitis."( The effect of simvastatin on systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction induced by periodontitis.
Costa, TP; Fávero, GM; Fernandes, D; Machado, WM; Mendes, RT; Olchanheski, LR; Otuki, MF; Prestes, AP; Santos, FA; Sordi, R; Vellosa, JC, 2014
)
2.21
"Simvastatin treatment did not have a statistically significant effect on any of the measured parameters. "( Statins and fibrates do not affect development of spontaneous cartilage damage in STR/Ort mice.
Bastiaansen-Jenniskens, YM; Bierma-Zeinstra, SM; Botter, SM; Clockaerts, S; Gierman, LM; Kloppenburg, M; van Osch, GJ; Verhaar, JA; Wei, W; Weinans, H; Zuurmond, AM, 2014
)
1.85
"Simvastatin treatment significantly decreased RAGEs expression in ECs from diabetic patients and determined a slight increase in PPAR-γ expression but the latter failed to reach statistical significance."( Simvastatin attenuates the endothelial pro-thrombotic shift in saphenous vein grafts induced by Advanced glycation endproducts.
Barbato, R; Chello, M; Coccia, R; Covino, E; De Marco, F; Di Domenico, F; Lusini, M; Spadaccio, C, 2014
)
2.57
"Simvastatin treatment seems to be a beneficial and supporting therapeutic that favors protection against alveolar bone loss in a model of experimental periodontitis in rats."( Evaluation of the effect of simvastatin on the progression of alveolar bone loss in experimental periodontitis--an animal study.
Battistetti, GD; da Costa, KF; Faccioni, DM; Kottwitz, LB; Marconato, J; Marin, CF; Nahsan, FP; Nassar, CA; Nassar, PO; Olegário, J, 2014
)
2.14
"Simvastatin treatment resulted in G1 cell cycle arrest, a reduction in the enzymatic activity of HMG-CoA, induction of apoptosis as well as DNA damage and cellular stress."( Simvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, exhibits anti-metastatic and anti-tumorigenic effects in endometrial cancer.
Bae-Jump, VL; Gehrig, PA; Gilliam, TP; Han, X; Kim, K; Schointuch, MN; Stine, JE; Zhou, C, 2014
)
2.57
"Simvastatin treatment significantly reduced total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and Hcy, whereas nitrite levels were increased."( Homocysteine and nitrite levels are modulated by MTHFR 677C>T polymorphism in obese women treated with simvastatin.
Andrade, VL; Eccard, B; Jordão, AA; Sandrim, VC; Sertório, JT; Silva, IF; Silveira, JN; Tanus-Santos, JE; Villela, MP, 2014
)
1.34
"Simvastatin treatment reduced myocyte cholesterol, caveolin 3 and caveolar density."( Caveolin contributes to the modulation of basal and β-adrenoceptor stimulated function of the adult rat ventricular myocyte by simvastatin: a novel pleiotropic effect.
Agarwal, SR; Calaghan, S; Harvey, RD; MacDougall, DA; Porter, KE; Pugh, SD, 2014
)
1.33
"Simvastatin treatment also decreased the expression of the vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 proteins, as measured in homogenized lung tissues (P<0.05) and human epithelial cells."( Attenuation of airway inflammation by simvastatin and the implications for asthma treatment: is the jury still out?
Lee, SI; Liu, JN; Park, HS; Shin, YS; Suh, DH; Yang, EM, 2014
)
1.39
"The simvastatin treatment group was given simvastatin by oral gavage 24 h after surgery."( Reduced apoptosis after acute myocardial infarction by simvastatin.
Long, HB; Luo, KQ; Xu, BC, 2015
)
1.15
"Simvastatin treatment also suppressed MMP-9 but not MMP-2 expression in human leukemia U937 and KU812 cells."( Simvastatin induces NFκB/p65 down-regulation and JNK1/c-Jun/ATF-2 activation, leading to matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) but not MMP-2 down-regulation in human leukemia cells.
Chang, LS; Chen, YJ, 2014
)
2.57
"Simvastatin treatment altered the release of cytokines and trophic factors from microglia, including interleukin-1-β, tumour necrosis factor-α, and brain derived neurotrophic factor in a cholesterol-dependent manner."( Statin treatment affects cytokine release and phagocytic activity in primary cultured microglia through two separable mechanisms.
Churchward, MA; Todd, KG, 2014
)
1.12
"Simvastatin treatment enhanced neurological functional recovery after TBI possibly via activation of Notch signaling and increasing neurogenesis in the injured area."( The effect of simvastatin treatment on proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells after traumatic brain injury.
Cong, D; Huang, Q; Liang, H; Wang, X; Wang, Y; Xie, C; Zhang, X, 2015
)
2.22
"Simvastatin-treated rats showed slight but significant decreases in MLI and MAN with a partial reversal of lung function decline (all P < 0.05)."( Simvastatin mitigates functional and structural impairment of lung and right ventricle in a rat model of cigarette smoke-induced COPD.
Jiang, X; Li, Z; Sun, W; Wang, L; Wang, Y; Zhang, L, 2014
)
2.57
"Simvastatin treatment effectively reduced total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, but had little effect on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. "( Downregulation of miR-146a, cyclooxygenase-2 and advanced glycation end-products in simvastatin-treated older patients with hyperlipidemia.
Jia, BB; Lv, YD; Mao, GX; Wang, GF; Wang, YZ; Yang, ZX; Yu, H, 2016
)
2.1
"Simvastatin treatment could inhibit inflammation and senescence-associated genes in older patients with hyperlipidemia, suggesting its application in inflammatory and age-related diseases."( Downregulation of miR-146a, cyclooxygenase-2 and advanced glycation end-products in simvastatin-treated older patients with hyperlipidemia.
Jia, BB; Lv, YD; Mao, GX; Wang, GF; Wang, YZ; Yang, ZX; Yu, H, 2016
)
2.1
"Simvastatin treatment in patients with AAAs may influence the concentration of proteases and their inhibitors (TIMPs) in aneurysmal wall tissue and ILTs. "( The Influence of Simvastatin on NGAL, Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Tissue Inhibitors in Human Intraluminal Thrombus and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Tissue.
Demyanets, S; Domenig, CM; Hofmann, M; Huk, I; Klinger, M; Mittlboeck, M; Nanobachvili, J; Neumayer, C; Piechota-Polanczyk, A; Wojta, J, 2015
)
2.2
"Simvastatin treatment improved cognitive function and locomotor activity in rats. "( Modulatory role of simvastatin against aluminium chloride-induced behavioural and biochemical changes in rats.
Chamallamudi, MR; John, J; Kumar, N; Mudgal, J; Nampoothiri, M; Nampurath, GK, 2015
)
2.19
"Simvastatin-treated patients experienced significantly more reductions in HDRS scores compared to the placebo group by the end of the trial (p=0.02)."( Simvastatin as an adjuvant therapy to fluoxetine in patients with moderate to severe major depression: A double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Akhondzadeh, S; Farokhnia, M; Gougol, A; Iranpour, N; Raheb, S; Salimi, S; Yekehtaz, H; Zareh-Mohammadi, N, 2015
)
2.58
"Simvastatin-treated cells and controls were directly assayed by CFSE (Carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester) staining to assess their cell proliferation and their RNA was used for microarray analyses and quantitative PCR (qPCR)."( Simvastatin modulates mesenchymal stromal cell proliferation and gene expression.
Dos Santos, DF; Lorenzi, JC; Palma, PV; Panepucci, RA; Prata, KL; Silva, WA; Zanette, DL, 2015
)
2.58
"The simvastatin treatment group was intraperitoneally administered simvastatin (5 mg/kg, 2.0 μL) at 1 h before, and daily for 14 days after surgery, while the sham-operated and LPS-model groups received saline."( Effects of simvastatin on the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in a lipopolysaccharide-induced rat model of Parkinson disease.
Bei-sha, T; Pei-pei, H; Tan, W; Tian, Z; Xiao-wu, C; Xue-bin, C; Zhi-bin, C, 2016
)
1.31
"In simvastatin-treated murine xenografts, ABCB1 was also reduced in the liver and rhabdomyosarcoma but did not reach significance in neuroblastoma."( In vitro and in vivo downregulation of the ATP binding cassette transporter B1 by the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin.
Atil, B; Bardy, J; Berger-Sieczkowski, E; Hohenegger, M; Werner, M, 2016
)
1.16
"Simvastatin treatment induced apoptosis in human cybrid prostate cancer cells. "( A mitochondrial DNA mutation influences the apoptotic effect of statins on prostate cancer.
Arnold, RS; Petros, JA; Sun, CQ; Sun, Q, 2015
)
1.86
"Simvastatin treatment promotes EAE clinical amelioration by inhibiting T cell proliferation and CNS infiltration by pathogenic Th1 and Th17 cells."( Simvastatin ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inhibiting Th1/Th17 response and cellular infiltration.
Câmara, NO; Cenedeze, MA; de Oliveira, DM; de Oliveira, EM; Ferrari, Mde F; Hiyane, MI; Pacheco-Silva, A; Peron, JP; Semedo, P, 2015
)
3.3
"In simvastatin-treated H1975 cells, expression of pro-apoptotic proteins was increased and the phosphorylation of ERK 1/2 (p-ERK 1/2) was reduced."( The apoptotic effect of simvastatin via the upregulation of BIM in nonsmall cell lung cancer cells.
Kang, HH; Kim, IK; Lee, HI; Lee, HY; Lee, SH; Mo, JY; Moon, HS; Yeo, CD, 2016
)
1.26
"The simvastatin group was pre-treated with simvastatin, whereas the control and sepsis groups were treated with saline before LPS treatment."( Effects of simvastatin on the expression of inducible NOS in acute lung injury in septic rats.
Chen, L; He, ZJ; Li, WC; Zheng, YK; Zhou, L; Zhou, MG; Zou, ZJ, 2015
)
1.29
"Simvastatin-treated groups received 50 mg/kg/day simvastatin for 30 days."( Structural effects of simvastatin on liver rat [corrected] tissue: Fourier transform infrared and Raman microspectroscopic studies.
Abbas, S; Bayari, SH; Garip, S; Lednev, IK; Severcan, F; Severcan, M, 2016
)
1.47
"Simvastatin treatment results in a significant dose-dependent decrease of SG neurite number, length of neurites, area of supporting cells, and SG neuronal survival compared to control."( Simvastatin Results in a Dose-Dependent Toxic Effect on Spiral Ganglion Neurons in an In Vitro Organotypic Culture Assay.
Bodmer, D; Brand, Y; Egloff, S; Glutz, A; Leitmeyer, K; Setz, C; Wieland, L, 2016
)
2.6
"Simvastatin pretreatment decreased mRNA expression of caspase-3 and -9, and RIPK1 and -3 and protein activity of caspase-9 and RIPK1 in the allografts."( Simvastatin pretreatment reduces caspase-9 and RIPK1 protein activity in rat cardiac allograft ischemia-reperfusion.
Holmström, E; Krebs, R; Lemström, KB; Raissadati, A; Rouvinen, E; Saharinen, P; Tuuminen, R, 2016
)
2.6
"Simvastatin treated cells did exhibit a reduced height-to-width aspect ratio and these changes in cell morphology resulted in a significant decrease in epithelial cell injury during airway reopening."( Simvastatin Treatment Modulates Mechanically-Induced Injury and Inflammation in Respiratory Epithelial Cells.
Ghadiali, SN; Higuita-Castro, N; Mihai, C; Shukla, VC, 2016
)
2.6
"Simvastatin treatment was found to induce type II collagen expression and sulfated-proteoglycan synthesis in a dose- and time-dependent manner."( Simvastatin induces differentiation of rabbit articular chondrocytes via the ERK-1/2 and p38 kinase pathways.
Han, Y; Kim, SJ, 2016
)
2.6
"Simvastatin treatment did not modify the plasma lipid levels; however, it recovered depressed cardiac performance and reduced reperfusion arrhythmias without affecting the activation of CaMKIIδ through phosphorylation of Thr287. "( Pleiotropic Effects of Simvastatin on Some Calcium Regulatory and Myofibrillar Proteins in Ischemic/Reperfused Heart: Causality of Statins Cardioprotection?
Adameova, A; Carnicka, S; Lichy, M; Pancza, D; Ravingerova, T; Svec, P; Szobi, A, 2016
)
2.19
"Simvastatin treatment inhibited IL-13 transcription in a dose-dependent manner, and therefore diminished the IL-13-induced increase in OPN and restored IL-13-suppressed ADA."( Simvastatin up-regulates adenosine deaminase and suppresses osteopontin expression in COPD patients through an IL-13-dependent mechanism.
Barnes, PJ; Kasetsinsombat, K; Maneechotesuwan, K; Wongkajornsilp, A, 2016
)
2.6
"Simvastatin treatment did not reduce normal serum cholesterol or lipid levels in these mice, suggesting that the longevity effects may stem from the pleiotropic, non-cholesterol-related, effects of statins."( Combined statin and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor treatment increases the lifespan of long-lived F1 male mice.
Flegal, JM; Mote, PL; Spindler, SR, 2016
)
1.16
"Simvastatin pretreatment reduced endothelial tube formation in vitro and microvessel density in vivo."( Simvastatin inhibits tumor angiogenesis in HER2-overexpressing human colorectal cancer.
Li, G; Ling, J; Qiu, W; Wang, Y; Xu, B; Zheng, J, 2017
)
2.62
"Simvastatin treatment reduces the levels of glucose, lipid, leptin and neutrophil percentage, and improves airway inflammation and remodeling, which can be as a potential therapeutic target used in the treatment of obese asthma in humans."( Treatment of obese asthma in a mouse model by simvastatin is associated with improving dyslipidemia and decreasing leptin level.
Han, W; Li, J; Sun, L; Tang, H, 2017
)
1.43
"Simvastatin treatment for 35 days, at a dose having no significant effect on plasma lipid levels, significantly reduced atherosclerotic progression as evident by reduced macrophage content, inflammatory burden, and extracellular matrix component like proteoglycans and metalloproteinase-9."( Progression and Characterization of the Accelerated Atherosclerosis in Iliac Artery of New Zealand White Rabbits: Effect of Simvastatin.
Barthwal, MK; Dikshit, M; Farooqui, M; Jain, M; Kanshana, JS; Khanna, V; Kumar, S; Misra, A; Singh, V, 2017
)
1.38
"Simvastatin treatment for 35 days exhibited anti-atherosclerotic efficacy without significantly lowering the circulating lipids."( Progression and Characterization of the Accelerated Atherosclerosis in Iliac Artery of New Zealand White Rabbits: Effect of Simvastatin.
Barthwal, MK; Dikshit, M; Farooqui, M; Jain, M; Kanshana, JS; Khanna, V; Kumar, S; Misra, A; Singh, V, 2017
)
1.38
"Simvastatin treatment did not change plasma cholesterol levels or modify the adrenal expression levels of genes involved in cholesterol metabolism. "( Simvastatin treatment aggravates the glucocorticoid insufficiency associated with hypocholesterolemia in mice.
Hoekstra, M; Nahon, JE; Ouweneel, AB; van der Sluis, RJ; Van Eck, M, 2017
)
3.34
"Simvastatin treatment significantly increased EPC in the hypercholesterolemic group, but failed to improve the EPC levels in the SSc patients, mainly in patients with late disease. "( Simvastatin reduces endothelial activation and damage but is partially ineffective in inducing endothelial repair in systemic sclerosis.
Comina, DP; Cortelezzi, A; Cortiana, M; Del Papa, N; Lucchi, T; Maglione, W; Silvestris, I; Vitali, C, 2008
)
3.23
"Simvastatin treatment significantly decreased blood-brain barrier (BBB) leakage and concomitantly, increased Ang1, Tie2 and Occludin expression in the ischaemic border (IBZ) compared to the MCAo control group."( Increasing Ang1/Tie2 expression by simvastatin treatment induces vascular stabilization and neuroblast migration after stroke.
Chen, J; Chopp, M; Cui, X; Zacharek, A, 2009
)
1.35
"Simvastatin treatment significantly increased the number of peripheral blood CD34+ CD133+ cells, and serum concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and AKT was markedly increased in vivo."( HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor regulates endothelial progenitor function through the phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase/AKT signal transduction pathway.
Li, X; Xu, B, 2009
)
1.07
"Both simvastatin and losartan treatment significantly reversed the effects of DM on integrity of Cx43 expression."( Diabetes mellitus downregulates expression of connexin43 in rat aortic medial smooth muscle cells and can be reversed by simvastatin and losartan therapy.
Chang, LT; Chang, NK; Chiang, CH; Sheu, JJ; Sun, CK; Tsai, TH; Yip, HK; Youssef, AA,
)
0.79
"Simvastatin or placebo treatment once daily for 12 weeks."( Effect of simvastatin on cognitive functioning in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: a randomized controlled trial.
Aarsen, FK; Arts, WF; Bouman, MJ; Catsman, CE; de Goede-Bolder, A; de Zeeuw, CI; Elgersma, Y; Krab, LC; Kushner, SA; Lequin, M; Moll, HA; Pluijm, SM; Silva, AJ; van der Geest, JN, 2008
)
2.19
"Simvastatin treatment for 4 weeks significantly improved FMD and reduced low density LDL-C and total TC levels. "( [The effects of simvastatin withdrawal on brachial artery endothelial function in healthy normocholesterolemic men].
Chen, H; Liu, X; Qiao, ZG; Ren, JY; Wu, B; Zhang, FF, 2008
)
2.13
"Simvastatin treatment was found to activate protein kinase B (PKB)/c-akt, a primary effector of PI3K, and ectopic expression of constitutively active PKB was sufficient to induce IL-1beta release."( HMG-CoA reductase inhibition induces IL-1beta release through Rac1/PI3K/PKB-dependent caspase-1 activation.
Beekman, JM; Coffer, PJ; Frenkel, J; Koster, J; Kuijk, LM; Waterham, HR, 2008
)
1.07
"In simvastatin-treated animals, CSPG levels declined by 60% 8 days after brain stab injury, and by 62-64% 4 weeks after spinal cord injury (SCI)."( Statins decrease chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan expression and acute astrocyte activation in central nervous system injury.
Doolen, S; Holmberg, E; Kluge, BR; Sarmiere, PD; White, JT; Zhang, SX, 2008
)
0.86
"Simvastatin treatment is associated with moderate clinical improvement in patients with active RA. "( Changes in disease activity, cytokine production, and proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after simvastatin treatment.
Kozlov, VA; Shirinsky, IV; Shirinsky, VS; Solovyova, NY; Zheltova, OI,
)
1.77
"simvastatin treatment significantly increased arterial cell migration compared to control MCAo artery, whereas inhibition of Notch signaling activity by the gamma40-secretase inhibitor II significantly attenuated simvastatin-induced arterial cell migration."( Simvastatin increases notch signaling activity and promotes arteriogenesis after stroke.
Chen, J; Chopp, M; Cui, X; Yang, Y; Zacharek, A, 2009
)
2.52
"In simvastatin-treated patients, changes in LDL cholesterol related negatively to changes in M (r = -0.796, P < 0.01)."( Effects of high-dose simvastatin therapy on glucose metabolism and ectopic lipid deposition in nonobese type 2 diabetic patients.
Anderwald, C; Bayerle-Eder, M; Brehm, A; Esterbauer, H; Hofer, A; Krssak, M; Nowotny, P; Pfeiler, G; Roden, M; Szendroedi, J; Waldhäusl, W, 2009
)
1.19
"Simvastatin treatment resulted in a marked reduction of T and B cells in spleen, lymph nodes and peripheral blood in mice."( Simvastatin impairs humoral and cell-mediated immunity in mice by inhibiting lymphocyte homing, T-cell activation and antigen cross-presentation.
Baldari, CT; Benati, D; Fanigliulo, D; Pasini, FL; Ulivieri, C, 2008
)
2.51
"Simvastatin treatment significantly altered nodule morphology, resulting in dramatic nodule dissipation over time, also in a substrate-dependent manner."( Efficacy of simvastatin treatment of valvular interstitial cells varies with the extracellular environment.
Gu, X; Masters, KS; Monzack, EL, 2009
)
1.45
"In simvastatin treated I/R rats we had increase in functional recovery."( The effects of simvastatin on functional recovery of rat reperfused sciatic nerve.
Abolhassani, F; Akbari, M; Gholami, MR; Mehrania, K; Pasbakhsh, P; Sobhani, A; Sohrabi, D, 2007
)
1.21
"Simvastatin treatment in diabetic rats, in addition to the treatment of diabetic dislipidemia, has also partially treated the endothel-mediated releasing response in diabetes. "( Vascular reactivity in the experimental, simvastatin-treated diabetes with endothelial dysfunction.
Demirel, E; Ergül, E; Köksoy, C; Yalcin, B; Yalcin, S, 2008
)
2.05
"Oral simvastatin treatment (10-20 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) increased bone volume and osteoblast number in the distal femurs, proximal tibiae and vertebrae of OVX rats."( Simvastatin increases osteoblasts and osteogenic proteins in ovariectomized rats.
Chang, JK; Chen, CH; Chen, YH; Fu, YC; Ho, ML; Hung, SH; Lee, MJ; Liao, HJ; Wang, GJ; Wang, YH, 2009
)
2.25
"Simvastatin treatment induced an increase in autoantibodies against an oxLDL antigen."( Effects of simvastatin on circulating autoantibodies to oxidized LDL antigens: relation with immune stimulation markers.
Cherfan, P; Gonçalves, I; Jonasson, L; Nordin Fredrikson, G; Söderberg, I, 2009
)
1.46
"Simvastatin treatment of mice led to a significant increase in AMPK and LKB1 phosphorylation and to a decrease in protein kinase A activity relative to control animals, associated with a marked increase in Rac1 activation."( Regulation of Rac1 by simvastatin in endothelial cells: differential roles of AMP-activated protein kinase and calmodulin-dependent kinase kinase-beta.
Kou, R; Michel, T; Sartoretto, J, 2009
)
1.39
"Simvastatin treatment (weeks 4 to 6) caused a decrease in myelin load and both Olig2(strong) and Nkx2.2(strong) OPC numbers."( Statin therapy inhibits remyelination in the central nervous system.
Antel, JP; Bedell, BJ; Kennedy, TE; Kuhlmann, T; Ludwin, SK; Miron, VE; Owens, T; Zehntner, SP, 2009
)
1.07
"Simvastatin pretreatment inhibited TGF-beta1-mediated phosphorylation of smad-3."( Simvastatin impairs smad-3 phosphorylation and modulates transforming growth factor beta1-mediated activation of intestinal fibroblasts.
Burke, JP; Coffey, JC; Docherty, NG; Murphy, M; O'Connell, PR; Watson, RW, 2009
)
2.52
"In simvastatin-treated subjects (n = 9) significant reductions of PAI-1 were achieved (p = 0.028), while sCD40L and TAFI-Ag did not differ from baseline values."( Soluble CD40 ligand, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor-1-antigen in normotensive type 2 diabetic subjects without diabetic complications. Effects of metformin and rosiglitazone.
Akinci, B; Bayraktar, F; Comlekci, A; Demir, T; Ozcan, MA; Yener, S; Yesil, S; Yuksel, F, 2009
)
0.87
"The simvastatin-treated group showed lower serum lipid levels than the tongxinluo-treated group."( Chinese medicine tongxinluo significantly lowers serum lipid levels and stabilizes vulnerable plaques in a rabbit model.
Chen, WQ; Ji, XP; Jiang, H; Wu, YL; Zhang, C; Zhang, L; Zhang, Y; Zhao, YX; Zhong, L, 2009
)
0.83
"Simvastatin treatment of 1.0 mg/kg increased the number of morphologically intact neurons in the hippocampus, but treatment of 0.5 mg/kg had no significant effect."( Long-term benefits after treatment of traumatic brain injury with simvastatin in rats.
Chopp, M; Goussev, A; Kazmi, H; Lu, D; Mahmood, A; Qu, C, 2009
)
1.31
"Simvastatin treatment provides long-lasting functional improvement after TBI in rats. "( Long-term benefits after treatment of traumatic brain injury with simvastatin in rats.
Chopp, M; Goussev, A; Kazmi, H; Lu, D; Mahmood, A; Qu, C, 2009
)
2.03
"Simvastatin treatment leads to a significant decrease in malondealdehyde levels (p < 0.05) and increase in paraoxonase activity (p < 0.001) at both time points."( Simvastatin improves wound strength after intestinal anastomosis in the rat.
Acikgoz, S; Ankarali, H; Bahadir, B; Comert, M; Demirtas, C; Emre, AU; Irkorucu, O; Karadeniz Cakmak, G; Karakaya, K; Kertis, G; Pasaoglu, H; Tascilar, O; Ucan, BH, 2009
)
2.52
"Simvastatin treatment before methacholine bronchial challenge increased lung compliance and reduced airway hyperreactivity (P = 0.0001)."( Simvastatin inhibits airway hyperreactivity: implications for the mevalonate pathway and beyond.
Franzi, L; Kenyon, NJ; Last, J; Zeki, AA, 2009
)
2.52
"Simvastatin pretreatment reduced the LPS-induced increase in serum levels of ALT by 65% in hepatectomized animals."( Simvastatin attenuates hepatic sensitization to lipopolysaccharide after partial hepatectomy.
Jeppsson, B; Laschke, MW; Menger, MD; Schilling, MK; Slotta, JE; Thorlacius, H, 2010
)
2.52
"Simvastatin treatment partly prevented atherosclerotic changes induced by ovariectomy."( Antiatherogenic effect of simvastatin is not due to decrease of LDL cholesterol in ovariectomized golden Syrian hamster.
Bobková, D; Havlíčková, J; Kovář, J; Pitha, J; Poledne, R, 2010
)
1.38
"Simvastatin pretreatment reduced intestinal I/R injury and was associated with down- -regulation of serum TNF-alpha and tissue malondealdehyde level, and simvastatin administration maintained cellular antioxidant enzyme contents compared to the I/R group after 3 hours reperfusion time."( Simvastatin attenuates intestinal ischemia/reperfusion induced injury in rat.
Asl, NA; Hajipour, B; Hemmati, MR; Moein, A; Nasirizade, MR; Nourazar, AR; Saberifar, F; Somi, MH; Vatankhah, AM, 2009
)
2.52
"Simvastatin treatment significantly decreased tPA-induced hemorrhage incidence (p=0.022) and volume (p=0.0001) following embolization."( The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor simvastatin reduces thrombolytic-induced intracerebral hemorrhage in embolized rabbits.
Han, MK; Lapchak, PA, 2009
)
1.31
"Simvastatin treatment was superior to metformin alone, whereas a combination of simvastatin and metformin was not significantly superior to simvastatin alone."( Comparison of simvastatin and metformin in treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: prospective randomized trial.
Banaszewska, B; Duleba, AJ; Pawelczyk, L; Spaczynski, RZ, 2009
)
2.16
"Simvastatin pretreatment given orally produced acute anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting TNF-alpha and IL-1beta, but no IL-6 production."( Effect of simvastatin on proinflammatory cytokines production during lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in rats.
Dobrić, S; Milovanović, ZA; Nezić, L; Satara, SS; Skrbić, R; Stojaković, N; Stojiljković, MP, 2009
)
1.48
"Simvastatin pretreatment increased survival after H/R from 20% to 80%."( Simvastatin reduces mortality and hepatic injury after hemorrhage/resuscitation in rats.
Bormann, F; Czerny, C; Henrich, D; Höhn, C; Lehnert, M; Marzi, I; Relja, B; Seyboth, K, 2010
)
2.52
"Simvastatin treatment similarly did not affect total ubiquinone levels in the myotubes, unlike in HepG2 cells (22% reduction in CoQ10)."( Effect of simvastatin on cholesterol metabolism in C2C12 myotubes and HepG2 cells, and consequences for statin-induced myopathy.
Brecht, K; Krähenbühl, S; Lüscher, B; Mullen, PJ; Scharnagl, H, 2010
)
1.48
"Simvastatin-treated hearts exhibited smaller size of infarction (11.5% +/- 0.4% vs."( Changes in PPAR gene expression and myocardial tolerance to ischaemia: relevance to pleiotropic effects of statins.
Adameová, A; Antonopoulou, E; Carnická, S; Kelly, T; Khandelwal, VK; Lazou, A; Ondrejcáková, M; Pancza, D; Ravingerová, T, 2009
)
1.07
"Simvastatin treatment down-regulated the formation of microclots in this SAH model and the number of microthombi was decreased significantly in the SAH+simvastatin group compared to the SAH or SAH+vehicle groups (p <0.01)."( Influence of simvastatin on microthrombosis in the brain after subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats: a preliminary study.
Bian, JY; Chen, G; Shen, XO; Wang, Z; Zhou, D; Zhu, WW, 2010
)
1.45
"Simvastatin treatment significantly reduced the thickness of the intima and media aorta and increased vasa vasorum density in comparison with those in hyperlipidemic group."( [Effects of simvastatin on vasa vasorum and aortic endothelial function in rats].
Chen, MS; He, ZC; Lu, DF; Wang, W; Wu, J; Xiao, Y, 2010
)
1.46
"Simvastatin treatment greatly increased the densities of MBP immunostaining, inhibited microglial activation and reduced the numbers of pyknotic cells and neuronal loss."( Simvastatin attenuates hypomyelination induced by hypoxia-ischemia in neonatal rats.
Li, A; Li, S; Lv, S; Ma, H; Piao, H; Sun, C; Yu, Z; Zhang, N; Zhang, Y; Zhao, H, 2010
)
2.52
"Simvastatin treatment caused a decrease in epithelial iNOS levels, while MPO levels were not modulated."( Protective role of simvastatin on lung damage caused by burn and cotton smoke inhalation in rats.
Basaran, O; Belli, S; Haberal, M; Karabay, G; Karakayali, H; Kut, A; Ozdemir, BH; Türkoğlu, S, 2011
)
1.42
"Simvastatin treatment resulted in a decrease in the number of cancer cells (3LL, A549 and NCI-H292)."( Immune regulatory effects of simvastatin on regulatory T cell-mediated tumour immune tolerance.
Choi, HK; Hur, GY; In, KH; Jung, KH; Kang, KH; Kim, HO; Kim, JH; Lee, KJ; Lee, SY; Moon, JY; Shim, JJ; Shin, C; Yoo, SH, 2010
)
1.37
"Simvastatin treatment (20mg/kg, bolus subcutaneous injection) significantly improved clinical function and increased the P(50) by 143% when administered 1 hour following embolization but was ineffective at 3 hours."( Simvastatin improves clinical scores in a rabbit multiple infarct ischemic stroke model: synergism with a ROCK inhibitor but not the thrombolytic tissue plasminogen activator.
Han, MK; Lapchak, PA, 2010
)
2.52
"Simvastatin treatment significantly reduced C-reactive protein (CRP) levels while interleukin (IL)-6 levels remained unchanged."( Effects of simvastatin on proinflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases in hypercholesterolemic individuals.
Cherfan, P; Eriksson, P; Jonasson, L; Nilsson, L, 2011
)
1.48
"Simvastatin treatment limited pulmonary endothelial injury, attenuated pulmonary hyperpermeability, prevented the recruitment of leukocytes to the lung, reduced pulmonary cytokine levels and improved oxygenation in mechanically ventilated mice."( Simvastatin attenuates ventilator-induced lung injury in mice.
Gutbier, B; Hellwig, K; Hippenstiel, S; Morawietz, L; Müller, HC; Peters, H; Rosseau, S; Schmeck, B; Schmiedl, A; Suttorp, N; Tschernig, T; Witzenrath, M, 2010
)
2.52
"Simvastatin treatment prevented Aβ-induced production of IFN-γ in splenocytes."( Simvastatin enhances immune responses to Aβ vaccination and attenuates vaccination-induced behavioral alterations.
Cao, D; Fukuchi, K; Jin, J; Kim, HD; Kou, J; Lalonde, R; Li, L, 2010
)
2.52
"Simvastatin treatment blocked hyperglycemia-induced increases in VEGF, angiopoietin 2 and erythropoietin levels, as demonstrated by RT-PCR and Western blot analysis."( Simvastatin suppresses expression of angiogenic factors in the retinas of rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes.
Hur, DY; Kim, HW; Kim, JL; Lee, HK; Lee, SG; Ryu, GW; Yang, JW; Yun, IH, 2011
)
2.53
"Simvastatin treatment led to suppression of superoxide formation and decreased expression of VEGF, angiopoietin 2 and erythropoietin in diabetic rat retinas."( Simvastatin suppresses expression of angiogenic factors in the retinas of rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes.
Hur, DY; Kim, HW; Kim, JL; Lee, HK; Lee, SG; Ryu, GW; Yang, JW; Yun, IH, 2011
)
3.25
"The simvastatin treatment group showed significantly reduced LV wall thickness, myocardial cell diameters and LV collagen content at 40 weeks when compared with the control group (P<0.05)."( Simvastatin inhibited cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice fed a "Western-style diet" by increasing PPAR α and γ expression and reducing TC, MMP-9, and Cat S levels.
Du, J; He, JQ; Qin, YW; Sheng, L; Wang, LY; Ye, P, 2010
)
2.28
"Simvastatin treatment resulted in significant reductions in serum lipid levels at 3 months and beyond, compared to at baseline. "( Effects of simvastatin on markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelial cell apoptosis in patients on chronic hemodialysis.
Alexopoulos, E; Belechri, AM; Dogrammatzi, F; Efstratiadis, G; Kirmizis, D; Memmos, D; Papagianni, A; Skoura, L, 2010
)
2.19
"Simvastatin treatment in MCT-PH rats not only attenuated pulmonary hypertension, but also desensitized PCF hypersensitivity and decreased the production of ROS. "( Effects of simvastatin on pulmonary C-fiber sensitivity in rats with monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension.
Chen, CF; Chen, JS; Hsu, HH; Hsu, JY; Ko, WJ; Lai, IR; Lee, YC; Ruan, T, 2011
)
2.2
"Simvastatin-ezetimibe treatment was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in AVEs in any individual tertile."( Impact of baseline severity of aortic valve stenosis on effect of intensive lipid lowering therapy (from the SEAS study).
Boman, K; Brudi, P; Chambers, JB; Egstrup, K; Gerdts, E; Gohlke-Bärwolf, C; Holme, I; Kesäniemi, YA; Malbecq, W; Nienaber, C; Pedersen, TR; Ray, S; Rossebø, AB; Skjærpe, T; Wachtell, K; Willenheimer, R, 2010
)
1.08
"Simvastatin treatment inhibited dose-dependently tumor cell growth and attachment to endothelium."( Simvastatin modulates the adhesion and growth of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via decrease of integrin expression and ROCK.
Blaheta, R; Henrich, D; Lehnert, M; Marzi, I; Meder, F; Relja, B; Wang, M, 2011
)
2.53
"Simvastatin treatment also resulted in a proteasome-sensitive reduction in the protein expression of all the subunits of the eIF2B heteropentameric complex."( Simvastatin represses protein synthesis in the muscle-derived C₂C₁₂ cell line with a concomitant reduction in eukaryotic initiation factor 2B expression.
Jefferson, LS; Jefferson, SJ; Kimball, SR; Tuckow, AP, 2011
)
2.53
"Simvastatin pre-treatment also prevented the increase in eNOS monomer formation that was associated with SAH, decreased superoxide anion radical production and increased NO."( Simvastatin re-couples dysfunctional endothelial nitric oxide synthase in experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Ai, J; Macdonald, RL; Marsden, PA; Sabri, M, 2011
)
2.53
"Simvastatin-treated cells displayed an altered lamellipodia with poorly developed focal adhesion contacts and reduced levels of β1 integrin activation."( Simvastatin alters fibroblastic cell responses involved in tissue repair.
Cáceres, M; Copaja, M; Díaz-Araya, G; Martínez, J; Romero, A; Smith, PC, 2011
)
2.53
"Simvastatin treatment to I+G mice attenuated their cardiac apoptosis, iron deposition, and abrogated thrombus formation by attenuating systemic inflammation and leukocytosis, which was likely due to the activation of pAKT activation."( Granulocyte-CSF induced inflammation-associated cardiac thrombosis in iron loading mouse heart and can be attenuated by statin therapy.
Cheng, CF; Cheng, WT; Kikuchi, T; Lian, WS; Lin, H, 2011
)
1.09
"Simvastatin in both treated groups significantly decreased serum levels of triacylglycerols and VLDL-cholesterol in comparison to the control animals."( Antineoplastic effects of simvastatin in experimental breast cancer.
Bojková, B; Kajo, K; Kassayová, M; Kubatka, P; Orendás, P; Péc, M; Stollárová, N; Zihlavniková, K, 2011
)
1.39
"Simvastatin treatment can attenuate hindlimb motor dysfunction and histopathological changes in spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats."( Reduction of spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury with simvastatin in rats.
Hayashi, J; Kohno, T; Saito, T; Tsuchida, M; Umehara, S; Yamamoto, H, 2011
)
2.06
"Simvastatin treatment significantly down-regulated the percentage of MMP-3 expression in chondrocytes as assessed by immunohistochemistry methods. "( Mechanically induced experimental knee osteoarthritis benefits from anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of simvastatin via inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-3.
Aktas, E; Gocun, PU; Sener, E, 2011
)
2.02
"Simvastatin treatment of U251 and C6 glioma cell lines caused the appearance of autophagolysosome-like intracytoplasmic acidic vesicles."( Inhibition of AMPK-dependent autophagy enhances in vitro antiglioma effect of simvastatin.
Bumbasirevic, V; Harhaji-Trajkovic, L; Janjetovic, K; Micic, D; Misirkic, M; Ristic, B; Sumarac-Dumanovic, M; Tovilovic, G; Trajkovic, V; Vilimanovich, U; Vucicevic, L, 2012
)
1.33
"In simvastatin-treated patients (n = 57), the dose was increased to 80 mg in five patients who had not attained the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) target for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) during the core study."( Long-term efficacy of pitavastatin versus simvastatin.
Budinski, D; Eriksson, M; Hounslow, N, 2011
)
1.15
"Simvastatin treatment (5 mg/kg/day for 2 wks) was performed by gavage."( Simvastatin-induced cardiac autonomic control improvement in fructose-fed female rats.
Bernardes, N; Brito, Jde O; De Angelis, K; Irigoyen, MC; Sanches, IC; Silva, RJ, 2011
)
2.53
"Simvastatin treatment improved insulin sensitivity and cardiac autonomic control in an experimental model of metabolic syndrome in female rats. "( Simvastatin-induced cardiac autonomic control improvement in fructose-fed female rats.
Bernardes, N; Brito, Jde O; De Angelis, K; Irigoyen, MC; Sanches, IC; Silva, RJ, 2011
)
3.25
"Simvastatin treatment does not influence Gα(s) protein stability, and paradoxically increases the abundance of Gα(s) mRNA."( Suppression of Gαs synthesis by simvastatin treatment of vascular endothelial cells.
Kou, R; Michel, T; Sartoretto, JL; Shiroto, T, 2012
)
1.38
"Simvastatin treatment of hypercholesterolemic mice and monkeys reduced oxLDL, monocyte TF expression, MP TF activity, activation of coagulation, and inflammation, without affecting total cholesterol levels."( Monocyte tissue factor-dependent activation of coagulation in hypercholesterolemic mice and monkeys is inhibited by simvastatin.
Antoniak, S; Curtiss, LK; Daugherty, A; Dutton, JA; Furie, B; Furie, BC; Hubbard, BK; Johns, DG; Kirchhofer, D; Luyendyk, JP; Mackman, N; Marshall, SM; McDaniel, AL; Moriarty, PM; Nagarajan, S; Owens, AP; Passam, FH; Rudel, L; Temel, RE; Tobias, PS; Wang, J; Williams, JC, 2012
)
1.31
"Simvastatin treatment with doses ranging from 0.5 to 20 mg/kg/day significantly enhanced early epithelial recovery and reduced the development of OAD. "( Effect of simvastatin on development of obliterative airway disease: an experimental study.
Hollmén, M; Keränen, MA; Krebs, R; Lemström, KB; Nykänen, AI; Ropponen, JO; Syrjälä, SO; Tikkanen, JM; Tuuminen, R; Vaali, K, 2012
)
2.22
"Simvastatin treatment inhibited adaptive T-cell alloimmune activation as depicted by reduced expression of lymphocyte chemokine and pro-inflammatory cytokine mRNA and reduced allograft infiltration by inflammatory cells. "( Effect of simvastatin on development of obliterative airway disease: an experimental study.
Hollmén, M; Keränen, MA; Krebs, R; Lemström, KB; Nykänen, AI; Ropponen, JO; Syrjälä, SO; Tikkanen, JM; Tuuminen, R; Vaali, K, 2012
)
2.22
"Simvastatin treatment did not alter the activation status of iNKT cells as measured by HLA-DR expression."( Statin-induced immunomodulation alters peripheral invariant natural killer T-cell prevalence in hyperlipidemic patients.
Babageorgakas, P; Bouchliou, I; Kotsianidis, I; Margaritis, D; Miltiades, P; Nakou, E; Spanoudakis, E; Stakos, DA; Tziakas, DN, 2012
)
1.1
"Simvastatin treatment resulted in a statistically signuficant decrease of the IMT thickness of the right common carotid artery. "( [Simvastatin influence on carotid atherosclerotic disease regression].
Davidović, L; Radmili, O; Vasić, D; Vraneš, M,
)
2.48
"Simvastatin-treated animals showed significantly better locomotor recovery, less signal abnormality in MRI and a smaller cavity volume compared to the control group."( Simvastatin mobilizes bone marrow stromal cells migrating to injured areas and promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury in the rat.
Cui, Y; Dang, G; Han, X; Song, C; Xu, Y; Yang, N, 2012
)
2.54
"Simvastatin treatment before and after onset of ALI reduces neutrophil influx into the lung as well as lung permeability indicating the protective role of simvastatin in ALI. "( Simvastatin reduces endotoxin-induced acute lung injury by decreasing neutrophil recruitment and radical formation.
Binnebösel, M; Dembinski, R; Drechsler, M; Grommes, J; Hartwig, H; Jacobs, M; Koeppel, TA; Mörgelin, M; Soehnlein, O; Vijayan, S; Weber, C, 2012
)
3.26
"Simvastatin-treated subjects were separated according to their median creatine kinase (CK) increase."( Effect of a high dose of simvastatin on muscle mitochondrial metabolism and calcium signaling in healthy volunteers.
Chevassus, H; Costa, F; Cristol, JP; Dupuy, A; Farret, A; Gagnol, JP; Galtier, F; Lacampagne, A; Mercier, J; Mura, T; Petit, P; Raynaud de Mauverger, E, 2012
)
1.4
"Simvastatin treatment activated free radical oxidation, which was seen from enhanced chemiluminescence in the mucosa homogenate (by 1.7-4.6 times)."( Effect of HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitor on DNA synthesis and free radical oxidation in the gastric mucosa under normal conditions and during indometacin-induced ulcerative process in the stomach of albino mice.
Bragina, VV; Fleischman, MY; Lebedko, OA; Sazonova, EN; Timoshin, SS; Zhivotova, EY, 2012
)
1.1
"Simvastatin, treatment significantly improved all of these parameters in model rats (vs."( [Simvastatin inhibits activation of hepatic stellate cells and promotes activation of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase].
Cao, W; Wang, W; Yan, L; Zhao, CY, 2012
)
2.01
"Simvastatin treatment also reduced umbilical vein endothelial cell aging and increased SIRT1 expression."( Antiaging effects of simvastatin on vascular endothelial cells.
Gu, X; Lei, J; Shi, J; Ye, Z; Zheng, X, 2014
)
1.44
"Simvastatin treatment resulted in increased mRNA and protein expression of molecules such as TNF, Fas-L, Traf1 and cleaved caspase 8, major mediators of intrinsic apoptosis pathway and reduced protein levels of pro-survival genes Lhx4 and Nme5."( Simultaneous modulation of the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways by simvastatin in mediating prostate cancer cell apoptosis.
Al-Azayzih, A; Al-Husein, B; Goc, A; Kochuparambil, ST; Mohammad, S; Somanath, PR, 2012
)
1.34
"Simvastatin treatment stimulated the neurite outgrowth of PCNs after OGD, which was attenuated by LY294002 and enhanced by lithium chloride (LiCl)."( Simvastatin attenuates axonal injury after experimental traumatic brain injury and promotes neurite outgrowth of primary cortical neurons.
Chopp, M; Mahmood, A; Qu, C; Wu, H; Xiong, Y, 2012
)
2.54
"Simvastatin treatment increased levels of circulating EPCs and NO."( Simvastatin increases circulating endothelial progenitor cells and reduces the formation and progression of diabetic retinopathy in rats.
Yan, H; Zhang, W, 2012
)
2.54
"Simvastatin pretreatment at low (5-20 µM), but not high (50-100 µM) doses markedly reduced apoptosis and increased proliferation and SP-C expression."( Restoration of alveolar type II cell function contributes to simvastatin-induced attenuation of lung ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Fan, X; Feng, D; Jiang, F; Lv, J; Wu, Y; Xu, L; Yin, R; Zhang, Z, 2012
)
1.34
"Simvastatin-treated patients had an impaired glucose tolerance and displayed a decreased insulin sensitivity index. "( Simvastatin effects on skeletal muscle: relation to decreased mitochondrial function and glucose intolerance.
Bang, LE; Bundgaard, H; Dela, F; Hansen, CN; Helge, JW; Hey-Mogensen, M; Larsen, S; Nielsen, LB; Stride, N, 2013
)
3.28
"Simvastatin treatment increased rat erythrocyte deformability compared with controls (n = 6, P < 0.05)."( Simvastatin and GGTI-2133, a geranylgeranyl transferase inhibitor, increase erythrocyte deformability but reduce low O(2) tension-induced ATP release.
Clapp, KM; Ellsworth, ML; Sprague, RS; Stephenson, AH, 2013
)
2.55
"Simvastatin treatment reduces CRP levels, but without affecting the increased risk conferred by higher CRP levels at baseline."( Inflammatory predictors of mortality in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study.
Bellomo, G; Cianflone, D; Cook, T; Crea, F; Ginnetti, F; Kjekshus, J; Lanza, GA; Maggi, E; Monaco, C; Niccoli, G, 2002
)
1.28
"Simvastatin treatment upregulated eNOS expression and reduced the interaction of cytosolic protein with the 3'-untranslated region of eNOS mRNA."( [Effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition on endothelial dysfunction-inducing protein in hypercholesterolemic rabbits].
Arriero, MM; Casado, S; de Andrés, R; Farré, J; García-Colis, E; García-Méndez, A; Gómez, J; Jiménez, AM; Jiménez, P; López-Farré, A; Millás, I, 2002
)
1.04
"Simvastatin pretreatment also increased eNOS protein."( Simvastatin increases endothelial nitric oxide synthase and ameliorates cerebral vasospasm resulting from subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Laskowitz, DT; Lynch, JR; McGirt, MJ; Parra, A; Pearlstein, RD; Pelligrino, DA; Sheng, H; Warner, DS, 2002
)
2.48
"Simvastatin treatment before or after SAH attenuated cerebral vasospasm and neurological deficits in mice. "( Simvastatin increases endothelial nitric oxide synthase and ameliorates cerebral vasospasm resulting from subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Laskowitz, DT; Lynch, JR; McGirt, MJ; Parra, A; Pearlstein, RD; Pelligrino, DA; Sheng, H; Warner, DS, 2002
)
3.2
"Simvastatin treatment significantly decreased concentrations of vascular cell adhesion molecule and intracellular adhesion molecule after 3 and 6 months of the therapy, respectively."( Simvastatin and markers of endothelial function in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.
Brzosko, S; Hryszko, T; Malyszko, J; Malyszko, JS; Mysliwiec, M, 2002
)
2.48
"Simvastatin-treated animals showed increased expression of endothelial nitric-oxide-synthase (eNOS), and decreased expression of the ox-LDL receptor LOX-1 in renal endothelial cells."( Lipid-lowering-independent effects of simvastatin on the kidney in experimental hypercholesterolaemia.
Chade, AR; Feldstein, A; Lerman, A; Lerman, LO; Napoli, C; Sawamura, T; Wilson, SH, 2003
)
1.31
"Simvastatin treatment was associated with cytochrome C release from the mitochondria to the cytosol."( Bcl-xL overexpression protects from apoptosis induced by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in murine tubular cells.
Blanco-Colio, LM; Daehn, I; Egido, J; Justo, P; Lorz, C; Ortiz, A, 2003
)
1.04
"Simvastatin treatment also increased plasma NO(2)+NO(3) without affecting endothelial function, heart weight index, and blood pressure of control rats."( Effects of simvastatin on endothelial function after chronic inhibition of nitric oxide synthase by L-NAME.
Alvarez de Sotomayor, M; Herrera, MD; Jimenez, L; Marhuenda, E; Pérez-Guerrero, C, 2003
)
1.43
"Simvastatin treatment enhanced the expression level of mRNA for osteocalcin and protein for osteocalcin and osteopontin, and increased alkaline phosphatase activity significantly (p<0.05)."( Simvastatin induces osteoblastic differentiation and inhibits adipocytic differentiation in mouse bone marrow stromal cells.
Chen, Z; Dang, G; Guo, Z; Jia, H; Liu, Z; Ma, Q; Song, C, 2003
)
2.48
"Simvastatin treatment reduced right ventricular hypertrophy and reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis of pathological smooth muscle cells in the neointima and medial walls of pulmonary arteries."( Simvastatin rescues rats from fatal pulmonary hypertension by inducing apoptosis of neointimal smooth muscle cells.
Benson, G; Berry, GJ; Faul, JL; Kao, PN; Nishimura, T; Pearl, RG; Qiu, D; Shi, L; Vaszar, LT; Zhao, G, 2003
)
2.48
"Simvastatin treatment decreased the incorporation of acetate in cholesterol (-93.8%) and cholesterol esters (-70.2%), as expected."( Pharmacological modulation of fatty acid desaturation and of cholesterol biosynthesis in THP-1 cells.
Colombo, C; Galli, C; Ghezzi, S; Levati, MG; Mirtini, R; Risé, P, 2003
)
1.04
"simvastatin treatment of apoE(-/-) mice caused paradoxical hyperlipidemia and increased intimal hyperplasia."( Effects of simvastatin on plasma lipoproteins and response to arterial injury in wild-type and apolipoprotein-E-deficient mice.
Carrelli, AL; Chereshnev, I; Choudhury, RP; Elmalem, VI; Fallon, JT; Fisher, EA; Reis, ED; Soccio, R; Stern, JD,
)
1.24
"Simvastatin treatment did not alter serum total IgE or OVA-specific IgG1 and IgG2a levels."( A novel anti-inflammatory role of simvastatin in a murine model of allergic asthma.
Leung, BP; Liew, FY; McInnes, IB; McKay, A; Thomson, NC, 2004
)
1.32
"Simvastatin treatment inhibited the increases in myocardial nitrotyrosine content and in p67-phox and p22-phox expression, and significantly reduced LVH."( Simvastatin prevents load-induced protein tyrosine nitration in overloaded hearts.
Coelho, OR; Franchini, KG; Lagosta, VJ; Moreno, H; Nadruz, W, 2004
)
2.49
"Simvastatin treatment had a significant effect of decreasing IL-1beta [668+/-98 vs."( Simvastatin reduces interleukin-1beta secretion by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with essential hypertension.
Li, Q; Liu, L; Xiao, J; Xu, Z; Zhao, S, 2004
)
2.49
"Simvastatin treatment at doses of 20 mg-80 mg is well-tolerated in Asian and non-Asian CHD patients."( Efficacy and safety of simvastatin in Asian and non-Asian coronary heart disease patients: a comparison of the GOALLS and STATT studies.
Bilheimer, D; Chung, N; Davies, MJ; Lee, K; Loeys, T; Morales, D; Sangwatanaroj, S; Shah, A; Yin, WH; Zhu, JR, 2004
)
1.36
"Simvastatin treatment significantly reduced serum cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and apolipoprotein (apo) B levels (p < 0.001). "( Effect of short term treatment with simvastatin and atorvastatin on lipids and paraoxonase activity in patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia.
Balogh, Z; Harangi, M; Illyés, L; Kovács, P; Paragh, G; Seres, I; Törocsik, D, 2004
)
2.04
"Simvastatin treatment for 5 years in a placebo-controlled trial, followed by open-label statin therapy, was associated with survival benefit over 10 years of follow-up compared with open-label statin therapy for the past 5 years only. "( Mortality and incidence of cancer during 10-year follow-up of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S).
Cook, TJ; Faergeman, O; Kjekshus, J; Pedersen, TR; Pyörälä, K; Strandberg, TE; Thorgeirsson, G; Wilhelmsen, L,
)
1.8
"Simvastatin treatment initiated from 13 weeks after AS operation significantly improved LV function and reduced superoxide levels and cardiomyocyte apoptosis in LV tissues."( Statins initiated after hypertrophy inhibit oxidative stress and prevent heart failure in rats with aortic stenosis.
Chen, MS; Luo, JD; Wang, YZ; Xu, FP; Yi, Q; Zhang, GP; Zhang, HQ, 2004
)
1.04
"Simvastatin treatment reduced plasma lipid levels and partially decreased the severity of hyperglycaemia."( Effects of simvastatin treatment on oxidant/antioxidant state and ultrastructure of streptozotocin-diabetic rat lung.
Aktan, F; Can, B; Ceylan, A; Gönül, B; Güven, C; Oz, E; Ozansoy, G,
)
1.24
"Simvastatin treatment in older patients was as safe and effective as in younger patients. "( Primary cardiovascular events and serum lipid levels in elderly Japanese with hypercholesterolemia undergoing 6-year simvastatin treatment: a subanalysis of the Japan lipid intervention trial.
Horiuchi, H; Itakura, H; Kita, T; Mabuchi, H; Matsuzaki, M; Matsuzawa, Y; Nakaya, N; Oikawa, S; Saito, Y; Sasaki, J; Shimamoto, K, 2004
)
1.98
"Simvastatin treatment stopped the loss of body weight, completely normalized the increase of plasma lipids and partially reduced the hyperglycaemia in diabetic rats."( Simvastatin treatment restores vasoconstriction and the inhibitory effect of LPC on endothelial relaxation via affecting oxidizing metabolism in diabetic rats.
Aktan, F; Ceylan, A; Karasu, C; Ozansoy, G, 2004
)
2.49
"Simvastatin treatment in heart transplant recipients decreased myocardium TNF-alpha expression. "( Simvastatin decreases myocardial tumor necrosis factor alpha content in heart transplant recipients.
Becker, KA; Farmer, JA; Koerner, MM; Küçüker, SA; McRee, SC; Noon, GP; Stetson, SJ; Torre-Amione, G; Wallace, CK, 2005
)
3.21
"Simvastatin treatment lowered the Rho GTPase activities, whereas the Rho-associated kinase inhibitor Y27632 partially blocked the statin inhibitory effect on nitrite production in the cytokine-treated H9c2 cells."( Simvastatin attenuates expression of cytokine-inducible nitric-oxide synthase in embryonic cardiac myoblasts.
De Caterina, A; De Caterina, R; Di Napoli, P; Felaco, M; Geng, YJ; Grilli, A; Madonna, R; Massaro, M; Tang, D, 2005
)
2.49
"Simvastatin treatment produced marked anti-proliferative and pro-aptotic effects in DLD-1."( Up-regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity in left-sided human colon cancer.
Altomare, DF; Caruso, MG; Guerra, V; Messa, C; Montemurro, S; Notarnicola, M; Pricci, M,
)
0.85
"Simvastatin-treated monocytes showed little chemotaxis movement in response to monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), a specific CCR2 ligand."( HMG-CoA reductase inhibition reduces monocyte CC chemokine receptor 2 expression and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1-mediated monocyte recruitment in vivo.
Han, KH; Hong, KH; Kim, JB; Kim, JJ; Ko, J; Pak, YK; Park, SW; Ryu, J, 2005
)
1.05
"Simvastatin treatment is not associated with impairment in left ventricular systolic or diastolic function in hypercholesterolaemic subjects after 6 months of treatment."( Effects of simvastatin on blood lipids, vitamin E, coenzyme Q10 levels and left ventricular function in humans.
Colquhoun, DM; Goldsmith, J; Hicks, BJ; Jackson, R; Kostner, KM; Strakosch, C; Walters, M; Young, P, 2005
)
1.44
"Simvastatin treatment was not associated with hepatic dysfunction, muscle necrosis, or other adverse events."( Simvastatin treatment of pulmonary hypertension: an observational case series.
Kao, PN, 2005
)
2.49
"Simvastatin treatment appears safe in patients with PAH."( Simvastatin treatment of pulmonary hypertension: an observational case series.
Kao, PN, 2005
)
3.21
"Simvastatin and ezetimibe treatment reduced LDL cholesterol to a similar extent (15.6% versus 15.4%; P=NS), whereas changes in mevalonate, the product of HMG-CoA-reductase, differed between groups (Deltamevalonate-simvastatin, -1.04+/-0.62 versus Deltamevalonate-ezetimibe, 1.79+/-0.94 ng/mL; P<0.05 between groups)."( Simvastatin versus ezetimibe: pleiotropic and lipid-lowering effects on endothelial function in humans.
Bahlmann, F; de Groot, K; Drexler, H; Fauler, G; Fischer, D; Fliser, D; Kirchhoff, N; Landmesser, U; Manes, C; März, W; Mueller, M; Schulz, S; Spiekermann, S, 2005
)
2.49
"Simvastatin treatment decreased VLDL+LDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and apo B, CETP activity, cholesterol esterification and cholesteryl ester transfer."( Cellular cholesterol efflux to plasma from moderately hypercholesterolaemic type 1 diabetic patients is enhanced, and is unaffected by simvastatin treatment.
de Vries, R; Dullaart, RP; Groen, AK; Kerstens, MN; Sluiter, WJ; van Tol, A, 2005
)
1.25
"Simvastatin treatment of SLOS fibroblasts with residual DHCR7 enzymatic activity decreased 7DHC levels and increased cholesterol synthesis."( Residual cholesterol synthesis and simvastatin induction of cholesterol synthesis in Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome fibroblasts.
Gewandter, JS; Javitt, N; Krakowiak, PA; Porter, FD; Sterner, AL; Wassif, CA; Wright, BS; Yergey, AL, 2005
)
1.33
"Simvastatin treatment attenuated myocardial infarct size by 58% in wild-type but not eNOS knockout mice."( HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors inhibit endothelial exocytosis and decrease myocardial infarct size.
Baldwin, WM; Cameron, SJ; Greer, JJ; Lefer, DJ; Lowenstein, CJ; Matsushita, K; Morrell, CN; Talbot-Fox, K; Yamakuchi, M, 2005
)
1.05
"In simvastatin-treated isolated hearts, the levels of mRNA expression of SERCA and RyR2 were elevated compared with the control (P<0.05), while the mRNA expression of PLB did not change."( Effects of simvastatin on cardiac performance and expression of sarcoplasmic reticular calcium regulatory proteins in rat heart.
Hu, SJ; Zheng, X, 2005
)
1.23
"In simvastatin-treated ischemic animals, the expression of these proteins and caspase-3 activity were significantly lower when compared to that of ischemic animals."( Simvastatin reduces caspase-3 activation and inflammatory markers induced by hypoxia-ischemia in the newborn rat.
Balduini, W; Carloni, S; Cimino, M; De Simoni, MG; Mazzoni, E; Perego, C; Scopa, C, 2006
)
2.29
"Simvastatin treatment of 4 yr significantly decreased the elevated levels of serum TC from 234.5 +/- 30.8 to 186.3 +/- 20.5 mg/dL (p < 0.001), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from 116.7 +/- 22.5 to 82.7 +/- 16.6 mg/dL (p < 0.05) and TG from 200.3 +/- 109.2 to 97.0 +/- 45.2 mg/dL (p < 0.001). "( Long term efficacy of simvastatin in renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine or tacrolimus.
Ichimaru, N; Imamura, R; Matsumiya, K; Moriyama, T; Namba, Y; Nonomura, N; Okuyama, A; Shi, Y; Takahara, S; Toki, K, 2005
)
2.09
"Simvastatin treatment did not affect apoB levels and only slightly increased the LDL-PAF-AH/LDL-C ratio."( Modulating effects of cholesterol feeding and simvastatin treatment on platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase activity and lysophosphatidylcholine concentration.
Fan, P; Itabe, H; Matsunaga, A; Miura, S; Saku, K; Shimoji, E; Uehara, Y; Zhang, B, 2006
)
1.31
"Simvastatin treatment didn't influence Fb concentration."( [The comparison of simvastatin and atorvastatin effects on hemostatic parameters in patients with hyperlipidemia type II].
Broncel, M; Chojnowska-Jezierska, J; Kostka, B; Marczyk, I; Michalska, M; Sikora, J, 2005
)
1.38
"Simvastatin treatment significantly decreased serum CRP and TNF-a [from 14 +/- 6 to 7 +/- 3 mg/l (p = 0.025) and 30 +/- 5 to 16 +/- 4 pg/ml (p = 0.012), respectively], while quinapril had no significant changes in these 2 measures. "( Effects of Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and statin treatment on inflammatory markers and endothelial functions in patients with longterm rheumatoid arthritis.
Bayindir, P; Bayturan, O; Pirildar, T; Taneli, F; Tikiz, C; Tikiz, H; Tuzun, C; Utuk, O, 2005
)
1.77
"The simvastatin group was pretreated with simvastatin 10 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1) for 3 days, whereas the other groups received placebo."( Pretreatment with simvastatin reduces lung injury related to intestinal ischemia-reperfusion in rats.
Aldemir, D; Arslan, G; Candan, S; Ozen, O; Pirat, A; Yücel, M; Zeyneloglu, P, 2006
)
1.15
"Simvastatin treatment did not alter serum CETP activity compared to non-treated controls."( Assessing lipid lowering and plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity of simvastatin following administration to rabbits fed a high fat/cholesterol diet.
Lee, SD; Man, D; Risovic, V; Sivak, O; Wasan, KM, 2006
)
1.28
"Simvastatin treatment resulted in an increase of GPx activity by 38% (p<0.0001), but did not have a significant effect on TAS."( Beneficial effect of simvastatin treatment on LDL oxidation and antioxidant protection is more pronounced in combined hyperlipidemia than in hypercholesterolemia.
Javorský, M; Molcányiová, A; Stancáková, A; Tkác, I, 2006
)
1.37
"Simvastatin treatment significantly reduced circulating conjugated diene level and led to an increase in glutathione peroxidase activity. "( Beneficial effect of simvastatin treatment on LDL oxidation and antioxidant protection is more pronounced in combined hyperlipidemia than in hypercholesterolemia.
Javorský, M; Molcányiová, A; Stancáková, A; Tkác, I, 2006
)
2.1
"Simvastatin treatment did significantly (P < 0.05) improve survival (45%) compared with vehicle treatment (25%)."( Low-dose simvastatin improves survival and ventricular function via eNOS in congestive heart failure.
Elrod, JW; Greer, JJ; Jones, SP; Kakkar, AK; Lefer, DJ; Watson, LJ, 2006
)
1.47
"Simvastatin treatment did not affect the Th1 response but the results indicated a potential to suppress Th2."( Effects of simvastatin on human T cells in vivo.
Cherfan, P; Jonasson, L; Löfgren, S; Tompa, A; Wikby, A, 2007
)
1.45
"Simvastatin treatment resulted in a few discrete changes as regards peripheral T cells. "( Effects of simvastatin on human T cells in vivo.
Cherfan, P; Jonasson, L; Löfgren, S; Tompa, A; Wikby, A, 2007
)
2.17
"Simvastatin-treatment commenced 100 days postinfection."( Simvastatin prolongs survival times in prion infections of the central nervous system.
Baier, M; Bamme, T; Gültner, S; Lütjohann, D; Mok, SW; Riemer, C; Thelen, KM, 2006
)
2.5
"Simvastatin treatment did not inhibit AgLDL-induced macrophage lipid accumulation, but significantly increased the secretion of IL-1beta and IL-8 from macrophages, whilst inhibiting the secretion of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and having no significant effect on IL-6 secretion."( Simvastatin stimulates macrophage interleukin-1beta secretion through an isoprenylation-dependent mechanism.
Lindholm, MW; Nilsson, J, 2007
)
2.5
"Simvastatin treatment modified the plasma expression of FGG chain isoform 1, FGB chain isoforms 1 and 2, vitamin D binding protein isoform 3, apo A-IV, and haptoglobin isoform 2."( Proteomic study of plasma from moderate hypercholesterolemic patients.
Alonso-Orgaz, S; López-Farré, A; Macaya, C; Mateos-Cáceres, PJ; Moreno, L; Pérez-Vizcaíno, F; Rico, L; Sacristán, D; Segura, A; Tamargo, J, 2006
)
1.06
"The simvastatin treatment significantly diminished the microglial CCL5 expression induced by IFN-beta alone or by IFN-beta/TNF-alpha combination."( Suppressive effect of simvastatin on interferon-beta-induced expression of CC chemokine ligand 5 in microglia.
Kitani, H; Kuboyama, Y; Kurane, I; Morimoto, K; Nakamichi, K; Saiki, M; Takayama-Ito, M, 2006
)
1.13
"Simvastatin treatment not only prevented deterioration of LV function associated with hypercholesterolemia but improved LV function (dP/dtmax +130%; dP/dtmin +144%, P < 0.05)."( Simvastatin improves left ventricular function after myocardial infarction in hypercholesterolemic rabbits by anti-inflammatory effects.
Bauersachs, J; Fraccarollo, D; Hiss, K; Laufs, U; Ruetten, H, 2006
)
2.5
"Simvastatin treatment modulates endothelial CD40-sCD40L in both venous and arterial grafts, and therefore may represent a useful tool in the pharmacological prevention of graft failure."( Simvastatin reduces CD40 expression in an experimental model of early arterialization of saphenous vein graft.
Anselmi, A; Chello, M; Covino, E; Di Sciascio, G; Lusini, M; Patti, G; Spadaccio, C, 2006
)
3.22
"Simvastatin treatment not only reversed learning and memory deficits in the Tg2576 mice, but also enhanced learning and memory in the nontransgenic mice. "( Simvastatin enhances learning and memory independent of amyloid load in mice.
Cao, D; Fukuchi, K; Kim, H; Lester, R; Li, L, 2006
)
3.22
"Simvastatin pre-treatment resulted in a significant reduction in cytotoxicity (lactate dehydrogenase release and caspase 3 activation) following challenge compared with unchallenged neurons."( Simvastatin protects neurons from cytotoxicity by up-regulating Bcl-2 mRNA and protein.
Eckert, GP; Franke, C; Igbavboa, U; Johnson-Anuna, LN; Müller, WE; Wood, WG, 2007
)
2.5
"As simvastatin-treated cultures of yeast were passaged, the frequencies of petite cells (respiratory-deficient yeast mutants with deletions in the mitochondrial genome) increased with time and with simvastatin concentration."( Simvastatin reduces ergosterol levels, inhibits growth and causes loss of mtDNA in Candida glabrata.
Macreadie, IG; Westermeyer, C, 2007
)
2.3
"Simvastatin treatment with 1 mg/kg for 6 weeks reduced the ischemic injury."( Simvastatin pretreatment reduces the severity of limb ischemia in an experimental diabetes model.
Cakmak, A; Demirpençe, E; Deniz Dinçer, U; Köksoy, A; Köksoy, C; Okcu-Heper, A; Oziş, E; Yazgan, U, 2007
)
2.5
"Simvastatin pretreatment reduced limb ischemia-reperfusion injury in diabetic and nondiabetic animals. "( Simvastatin pretreatment reduces the severity of limb ischemia in an experimental diabetes model.
Cakmak, A; Demirpençe, E; Deniz Dinçer, U; Köksoy, A; Köksoy, C; Okcu-Heper, A; Oziş, E; Yazgan, U, 2007
)
3.23
"Simvastatin treatment (20 mg.kg(-1).day(-1)) commenced after 2 wk of hypoxia, at which time CHPH was fully established, reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure (19 +/- 0.5 vs."( Regression of chronic hypoxic pulmonary hypertension by simvastatin.
Champion, HC; Girgis, RE; Hassoun, PM; Johns, RA; Li, D; Mozammel, S; Peng, X; Shimoda, L; Tuder, RM, 2007
)
1.31
"Simvastatin treatment reduced serum Lp-PLA(2) and lyso-PC content in LDL."( Lysophosphatidylcholine contents in plasma LDL in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: relation with lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 and effects of simvastatin treatment.
Hattori, H; Higuchi, S; Iida, M; Iwase, M; Ohdo, S; Sasaki, N; Sonoki, K, 2008
)
1.26
"Simvastatin but not LT-4 treatment significantly improves EDV of the brachial artery and dyslipidemia in patients with SCH."( Simvastatin improves endothelial function in patents with subclinical hypothyroidism.
Demirtunc, R; Duman, D; Esertas, K; Sahin, S, 2007
)
2.5
"Simvastatin treatment also significantly prolonged the survival times of infected mice (193 vs."( Simvastatin treatment prolongs the survival of scrapie-infected mice.
Bate, C; Kempster, S; Williams, A, 2007
)
2.5
"The simvastatin treatment resulted in a significant effect in decreasing TF and PAI-1 (69.1 +/- 14.6 ng/l vs."( Simvastatin inhibits tissue factor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 secretion by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with primary nephrotic syndrome.
Cui, HM; Ma, CY; Wei, JL, 2007
)
2.26
"The simvastatin treatment made the attenuation of the above-mentioned indexes in this animal model (P<0."( [Effect of simvastatin on rat pulmonary hypertension induced by high pulmonary blood flow and injected monocrotaline].
Dou, H; Li, M; Liu, HM; Tang, ZH; Zhao, L; Zhou, TF, 2007
)
1.21
"Simvastatin treatment of the fractured bone showed a significant positive effect on fracture healing. "( New addition to the statin's effect.
Erdemli, E; Kiliçcoglu, SS; Serin-Kilicoglu, S, 2007
)
1.78
"Simvastatin treatment of patients reduced the total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, two of the lipid indices, plasma viscosity and hematocrit."( Lipid-modifying and pleiotropic effects of gemfibrozil, simvastatin and pravastatin in patients with dyslipidemia.
Doncheva, NI; Nikolov, KV; Vassileva, DP, 2006
)
1.3
"Simvastatin treatment reduced low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and total cholesterol (TC) levels and improved endothelial-dependent vasodilation in patients after 4 weeks. "( [The effects after withdrawal of simvastatin on brachial artery endothelial function in patient with coronary heart disease or risk factors].
Chen, H; Li, LJ; Liu, X; Luo, Y; Ren, JY; Wang, RJ; Wu, B, 2007
)
2.06
"Simvastatin treatment significantly decreased plasma lipids in all patients (P<0.01). "( Effect of ScrF I polymorphism in the 2nd intron of the HMGCR gene on lipid-lowering response to simvastatin in Chinese diabetic patients.
An, CY; Gao, YY; Liu, XM; Sun, YM; Ying, S, 2007
)
2
"The simvastatin-treated groups had significantly higher ratios of PaO(2)/FiO(2) and lower values of respiratory index than the control group. "( Simvastatin suppresses lung inflammatory response in a rat cardiopulmonary bypass model.
Dong, G; Jing, H; Liu, H; Qiang, J; Shao, H; Shen, Y, 2007
)
2.34
"Simvastatin treatment significantly increased the number of DiI-acLDL, UEA-1 lectin double-positive EPCs and facilitated its appearance. "( Simvastatin enhances endothelial differentiation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in hypercholesterolemic patients and induces pro-angiogenic cytokine IL-8 secretion from monocytes.
Cho, HJ; Hur, J; Hwang, KK; Kang, HJ; Kim, HS; Oh, BH; Park, KW; Park, YB; Yang, HM; Yoon, CH, 2008
)
3.23
"Simvastatin treatment lead to downregulation of many pro-inflammatory genes including several chemokines [e.g."( Simvastatin has an anti-inflammatory effect on macrophages via upregulation of an atheroprotective transcription factor, Kruppel-like factor 2.
Häkkinen, SK; Horrevoets, AJ; Kansanen, E; Levonen, AL; Lumivuori, H; Tuomisto, TT; Turunen, MP; van Thienen, JV; Ylä-Herttuala, S, 2008
)
2.51
"Simvastatin treatment significantly increased plasma levels of ApoA-I compared to the other three groups. "( HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, simvastatin improves reverse cholesterol transport in type 2 diabetic patients with hyperlipidemia.
Guan, JZ; Matsui, J; Matsuki, K; Murakami, H; Suda, T; Tamasawa, N; Tanabe, J; Yamashita, M, 2008
)
2.08
"Simvastatin pretreatment for short-term at high dose do not prevent renal function deterioration after administration of contrast medium in patients with baseline renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography."( Prevention of radiocontrast medium-induced nephropathy using short-term high-dose simvastatin in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography (PROMISS) trial--a randomized controlled study.
Chae, IH; Cho, YS; Choi, DJ; Choi, YS; Chung, WY; Jo, SH; Kang, HJ; Kim, HS; Kim, YJ; Koo, BK; Oh, BH; Park, JS; Park, YB; Sohn, DW; Youn, TJ, 2008
)
2.01
"Simvastatin treatment did not prevent uremia accelerated atherosclerosis in chronic kidney disease apoE(-/-) mice, nor did it retard atherosclerosis progression in control nonchronic kidney disease mice. "( Effect of simvastatin in apolipoprotein E deficient mice with surgically induced chronic renal failure.
Drüeke, TB; Ivanovski, O; Joki, N; Ketteler, M; Lacour, B; Maizel, J; Massy, ZA; Mothu, N; Nguyen-Khoa, T; Nikolov, IG; Szumilak, D; Westenfeld, R, 2008
)
2.19
"Simvastatin treatment reduced cell viability in all five melanoma cell lines."( Simvastatin inhibits growth via apoptosis and the induction of cell cycle arrest in human melanoma cells.
Furukawa, H; Mol, W; Oyama, A; Saito, A; Saito, N; Sasaki, S; Sekido, M; Tsutsumida, A; Yamamoto, Y, 2008
)
2.51
"Simvastatin treatment has been well tolerated by the patients."( [Simvastatin in the treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia].
Ceska, R; Kvasilová, M; Procházková, R; Sobra, J, 1995
)
1.92
"Simvastatin-treated A10 cells (5 mg/L for 24 hours) showed a normal initial peak response to vasopressin, but the plateau phase of Ca2+ entry was significantly impaired."( 3-Hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibition modulates vasopressin-stimulated Ca2+ responses in rat A10 vascular smooth muscle cells.
Davies, JE; Ng, LL; Wojcikiewicz, RJ, 1994
)
1.01
"Simvastatin treatment was associated with a sustained dose-related reduction in total and LDL cholesterol (-28% and -39% respectively at the end of the study)."( [Effectiveness and tolerability of simvastatin in subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia. Multicenter study].
Falaschi, F; Finardi, G; Franco, C; Perani, G; Ricciardi, R; Tramarin, R, 1993
)
1.28
"Simvastatin treatment decreased total and LDL-cholesterol significantly and was not associated with adverse effects."( What is the role of lipid lowering therapy in heart-allograft failure?
Brandl, U; Meiser, BM; Reichart, B; Seidel, D; Thiery, J; Wenke, K, 1995
)
1.01
"Simvastatin treatment increased apo-AI mRNA nearly threefold, whereas apo-AII and apo-AIV decreased by more than 50%."( Effects of hypolipidemic drugs on the expression of genes involved in high density lipoprotein metabolism in the rat.
Auwerx, J; Fruchart, JC; Staels, B; Van Tol, A, 1996
)
1.02
"Simvastatin treatment saved an estimated 0.377 undiscounted life years (0.240 life years discounted at 5% per annum)."( Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol lowering. Results from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)
Johannesson, M; Jönsson, B; Kjekshus, J; Olsson, AG; Pedersen, TR; Wedel, H, 1996
)
1.25
"Simvastatin treatment reduced plasma total cholesterol levels by 18 +/- 2% and low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 26 +/- 2% (P < .001 for both), whereas high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels increased slightly (6 +/- 2%, P < .05)."( No influence of simvastatin treatment on platelet function in vivo in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Angelin, B; Bröijersén, A; Eriksson, M; Hjemdahl, P; Leijd, B, 1997
)
1.36
"Simvastatin treatment was also associated with a change in the post-translational modification of the ras protein in smooth muscle cells, probably by inhibition of its farnesylation."( Inhibition of proliferation of human smooth muscle cells by various HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors; comparison with other human cell types.
Cohen, LH; Nègre-Aminou, P; van Erck, M; van Leeuwen, RE; van Thiel, GC; van Vliet, AK, 1997
)
1.02
"Simvastatin treatment resulted in a 28% fall in the CSI of bile at the end of therapy (P < 0.01)."( Dissolution of gallstones with simvastatin, an HMG CoA reductase inhibitor.
Allan, RB; Burt, MJ; Chapman, BA; Chisholm, RJ; Ross, AG; Yeo, KH, 1998
)
1.31
"Simvastatin treatment reduced plasma campesterol (-24%, P = .017) but did not affect circulating stigmasterol and sitosterol levels."( Effect of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor on sterol absorption in hypercholesterolemic subjects.
Frohlich, JJ; Jones, PJ; Ntanios, FY, 1999
)
1.02
"Simvastatin treatment was associated with a shorter LDL residence time (P<.01) and a decrease in LDL glycation (P<.001) with virtually no change in diabetic control (HbA1c, 6.0%+/-3.1% v."( Association between low-density lipoprotein composition and its metabolism in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Collins, P; Deegan, P; Johnson, A; Owens, D; Tomkin, GH, 1999
)
1.02
"Simvastatin (10 microm) treatment did not significantly alter either the secretion or intracellular degradation of apoB, relative to control."( Differential regulation of apolipoprotein B secretion from HepG2 cells by two HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, atorvastatin and simvastatin.
Barrett, PH; Huff, MW; Wilcox, LJ, 1999
)
1.23
"Simvastatin treatment caused an increase (72%) in lipoprotein lipase activity without affecting hepatic lipase activity."( Different effect of simvastatin and atorvastatin on key enzymes involved in VLDL synthesis and catabolism in high fat/cholesterol fed rabbits.
Adzet, T; Alegret, M; Díaz, C; Hernández, G; Laguna, JC; Peris, C; Sánchez, RM; Vázquez, M; Verd, JC, 1999
)
1.35
"Simvastatin treatment reduced cardiovascular disease-related hospitalizations by 23% in NFG (P = 0.001), 30% in IFG (P = 0.015), and 40% in diabetic subjects (P = 0.007) within trial (median follow-up of 5.4 years)."( Effect of simvastatin treatment on cardiovascular resource utilization in impaired fasting glucose and diabetes. Findings from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study.
Alexander, CM; Boccuzzi, SJ; Cook, JR; Herman, WH; Kjekshus, J; Musliner, TA; Pedersen, TR; Pyörälä, K, 1999
)
1.43
"Simvastatin-treated patients with DM had significantly reduced numbers of major coronary events (relative risk [RR] = 0.58; P = .001) and revascularizations (RR = 0.52; P = .005). "( Reduced coronary events in simvastatin-treated patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes or impaired fasting glucose levels: subgroup analyses in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study.
Alexander, CM; Boccuzzi, SJ; Cook, TJ; Haffner, SM; Kjekshus, J; Musliner, TA; Pedersen, TR; Pyörälä, K,
)
1.87
"With simvastatin treatment, TC and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels decreased significantly at 1 month in both groups, and these decreased levels were maintained throughout treatment (P < 0.001)."( Sex-related differences in response of plasma lipids to simvastatin: the Saitama Postmenopausal Lipid Intervention Study. S-POLIS Group.
Nakajima, K, 1999
)
1
"Simvastatin treatment reduced the mortality risk to 0.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.69) in epsilon4 carriers and to 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0."( The apolipoprotein epsilon4 allele determines prognosis and the effect on prognosis of simvastatin in survivors of myocardial infarction : a substudy of the Scandinavian simvastatin survival study.
Faergeman, O; Gerdes, C; Gerdes, LU; Hansen, PS; Kervinen, K; Kesäniemi, YA; Klausen, IC; Savolainen, M, 2000
)
1.25
"Simvastatin treatment had no effect on intracellular cAMP levels."( Simvastatin improves disturbed endothelial barrier function.
Emeis, JJ; Lankelma, J; Nègre-Aminou, P; van Hinsbergh, VW; van Nieuw Amerongen, GP; Vermeer, MA, 2000
)
2.47
"Simvastatin treatment reduced the fasting total cholesterol level from 237 +/- 5 to 178 +/- 6 mg/dL (-25%), the LDL cholesterol level from 150 +/- 6 to 87 +/- 5 mg/dL (-40%), and raised high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) level from 36 +/- 2 to 40 +/- 2 mg/dL (+11%) (all P <.001)."( Simvastatin treatment on postprandial hypertriglyceridemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with combined hyperlipidemia.
Chen, YT; Jeng, CY; Lee, WJ; Lin, SY; Pei, D; Sheu, WH, 2001
)
2.47
"Simvastatin treatment depresses blood clotting, which leads to reduced rates of prothrombin activation, factor Va generation, fibrinogen cleavage, factor XIII activation, and an increased rate of factor Va inactivation. "( Simvastatin depresses blood clotting by inhibiting activation of prothrombin, factor V, and factor XIII and by enhancing factor Va inactivation.
Brummel, KE; Mann, KG; Musial, J; Szczeklik, A; Undas, A, 2001
)
3.2
"Simvastatin pretreatment inhibited MVEC HILA-DR induction by IFN-gamma, as detected by flow cytometry. "( Inhibition of interferon-gamma-mediated microvascular endothelial cell major histocompatibility complex class II gene activation by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
Bender, JR; Collinge, M; O'Donnell, L; Pardi, R; Sadeghi, MM; Sadigh, K; Tiglio, A, 2001
)
1.75
"Simvastatin pretreatment inhibits CIITA and consequent HLA-DR induction by IFN-gamma in MVECs through interference with protein prenylation. "( Inhibition of interferon-gamma-mediated microvascular endothelial cell major histocompatibility complex class II gene activation by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
Bender, JR; Collinge, M; O'Donnell, L; Pardi, R; Sadeghi, MM; Sadigh, K; Tiglio, A, 2001
)
1.75
"Simvastatin treatment reduced the atherosclerotic area and total and esterified cholesterol concentrations in the thoracic aorta."( HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor stabilizes rabbit atheroma by increasing basal NO and decreasing superoxide.
Hayashi, T; Iguchi, A; Kano, H; Sumi, D; Thakur, NK; Tsunekawa, T, 2001
)
1.03
"The Simvastatin Treats Asians to Target (STATT) study used a titrate-to-goal protocol to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin 20 to 80 mg/d in the treatment of Asian patients with coronary heart disease."( STATT: a titrate-to-goal study of simvastatin in Asian patients with coronary heart disease. Simvastatin Treats Asians to Target.
Cai, NS; Cho, SY; Choi, DH; Chung, N; Fan, WF; Koh, KK; Lee, K; Lee, PY; Lee, S; Lee, SH; Panchavinnin, P; Phankingthongkum, R; Sangwatanaroj, S; Son, JW; Wang, JJ; Yin, WH; Young, MS; Zhu, JR, 2001
)
1.15
"Simvastatin treatment significantly decreased serum TC (240+/-29-200+/-22 mg/dl, P<0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; 114+/-20-99+/-17 mg/dl, P<0.05) and TG levels (217+/-103-130+/-38 mg/dl, P<0.01)."( Changes in lipid metabolism and effect of simvastatin in renal transplant recipients induced by cyclosporine or tacrolimus.
Hatori, M; Ichimaru, N; Inoue, T; Kameoka, H; Kokado, Y; Okuyama, A; Takahara, S; Wang, JD, 2001
)
1.3
"Simvastatin 40 mg treatment showed benefit across all patient groups regardless of age, gender or baseline cholesterol value and proved safe and well tolerated."( The MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study: preliminary results.
Armitage, J; Collins, R; Peto, R,
)
0.85
"Simvastatin treatment (either 1 or 2 mg/kg body weight for 12 or 20 weeks) increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activities in SHR rats compared with untreated control SHR rats."( Simvastatin improves endothelial function in spontaneously hypertensive rats through a superoxide dismutase mediated antioxidant effect.
Alvarez de Sotomayor, M; Bravo, L; Carneado, J; Herrera, MD; Jimenez, L; Marhuenda, E; Martin-Sanz, MD; Miranda, M; Pamies, E; Perez-Guerrero, C; Stiefel, P, 2002
)
2.48
"Simvastatin treatment also improved acetylcholine (ACh)-induced endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in isolated aortic rings, which was associated with an increase in NOS-3 expression by approximately 88% in the aorta measured by real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), P<0.05."( Anti-atherosclerotic effect of simvastatin depends on the presence of apolipoprotein E.
da Cunha, V; Dole, W; Hinchman, J; Huw, LY; Kauser, K; Martin-McNulty, B; Post, J; Sullivan, ME; Vergona, R; Wang, YX, 2002
)
1.32
"Simvastatin treatment in 34 male Sprague-Dawley rats accelerated reendothelialization of the balloon-injured arterial segments (reendothelialized area at 2 weeks, 12.3+/-1.8 versus 5.4+/-1.1 mm2, P< 0.01) and resulted in a dose-dependent (0.2 or 1 mg/kg IP) significant reduction in neointimal thickening at 2, 3, and 4 weeks compared with saline-injected controls (n=18). "( Statin therapy accelerates reendothelialization: a novel effect involving mobilization and incorporation of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells.
Asahara, T; Bahlmann, FH; Isner, JM; Kirchmair, R; Losordo, DW; Murayama, T; Nishimura, H; Rittig, K; Silver, M; Walter, DH, 2002
)
1.76
"Simvastatin treatment was associated with reduced cellular proliferation (BrdU), leukocyte accumulation (CD45), and platelet-derived growth factor-induced phosphorylation of the survival factor Akt and increased apoptosis after injury."( Simvastatin reduces neointimal thickening in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice after experimental angioplasty without changing plasma lipids.
Chen, Z; Detmers, PA; Ehlers, R; Fukutomi, T; Rogers, C; Simon, DI; Wright, SD; Zago, AC, 2002
)
2.48
"Simvastatin treatment was initiated with a 10 mg dose for 6 weeks; this was increased to 20 mg and 40 mg at 12 and 18 weeks of follow-up respectively if the total cholesterol level had not decreased to below 5.17 mmol/l."( Simvastatin in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients with hypercholesterolaemia.
Bonnici, F; Fourie, J; Kotze, TJ; Lourens, W; Omar, MA; Stander, I; Steyn, K; van Lathem, J; Vermaak, WJ; Weich, HF, 1992
)
2.45
"With simvastatin treatment, the mean decreases in total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B (apo B) were 39%, 46%, and 36%, respectively."( Treatment with hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in hypercholesterolemia induces changes in the components of the extrinsic coagulation system.
Abildgaard, U; Lund, H; Norseth, J; Ose, L; Sandset, PM,
)
0.59
"Simvastatin treatment reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 40% after 12 weeks, compared with 33% in the cholestyramine group."( Simvastatin and cholestyramine in the long-term treatment of hypercholesterolaemia.
Nordøy, A; Ytre-Arne, K, 1989
)
2.44
"Treatment with simvastatin and rifaximin was associated with changes in 161 of 985 metabolites in comparison to treatment with placebo."( Treatment With Simvastatin and Rifaximin Restores the Plasma Metabolomic Profile in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis.
Abraldes, JG; Alessandria, C; Beuers, U; Campion, D; Caraceni, P; Carol, M; Davis, MM; de Wit, K; Durand, F; Francoz, C; Ginès, P; Jiménez, C; Juanola, A; Kamath, PS; Kazankov, K; Lozano, JJ; Ma, AT; Mookerjee, RP; Morales-Ruiz, M; Napoleone, L; Piano, S; Pose, E; Sidorova, J; Solà, E; Tonon, M; Trebicka, J; Uschner, F; Vargas, V; Watson, H; Zaccherini, G, 2022
)
1.41
"Treatment with simvastatin significantly reduced tumour volume and inhibited the Ki67 expression when compared to the control group."( Simvastatin-loaded liposome nanoparticles treatment for uterine leiomyoma in a patient-derived xenograft mouse model: a pilot study.
Afrin, S; Borahay, MA; El Sabeh, M; Kilic, GS; Motamedi, M; Ozpolat, B; Saada, J; Vincent, KL; Yang, J, 2022
)
2.5
"Mice treated with simvastatin had significantly fewer generalized seizures during the first three hours without a significant effect on generalized seizures after two weeks."( Repurposing of cholesterol-lowering agents in status epilepticus: A neuroprotective effect of simvastatin.
Baudin, P; Hanin, A; Lecas, S; Navarro, V; Roussel, D, 2023
)
1.45
"Treatment with simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin in patients with decompensated cirrhosis was associated with a significant increase in adverse events requiring treatment withdrawal, particularly rhabdomyolysis, compared with simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin. "( Safety of two different doses of simvastatin plus rifaximin in decompensated cirrhosis (LIVERHOPE-SAFETY): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.
Abraldes, JG; Alessandria, C; Amin, A; Andrade, RJ; Angeli, P; Bernardi, M; Beuers, U; Campion, D; Caraceni, P; Carol, M; de Wit, K; Domenech, G; Durand, F; Ferrero, J; Ginès, P; Jimenez, C; Kamath, PS; Llopis, M; Mookerjee, RP; Napoleone, L; Piano, S; Pich, J; Pose, E; Roux, O; Solà, E; Torres, F; Trebicka, J; Uschner, FE; Vargas, V; Zaccherini, G, 2020
)
1.19
"Pretreatment with simvastatin blunted most of the assessed parameters related to sickness syndrome, including depressive-like behavior and depressed locomotor activity, and attenuated LPS-induced fever. "( Simvastatin attenuated sickness behavior and fever in a murine model of endotoxemia.
Cabral, LDM; Dos Santos, RS; Giusti-Paiva, A; Oliveira, MK; Vilela, FC, 2020
)
2.33
"Treatment with simvastatin prevented SNP- and IL-1β-induced nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) activity."( Simvastatin abolishes nitric oxide- and reactive oxygen species-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression by blocking the nuclear factor κB pathway in rabbit articular chondrocytes.
Han, Y; Kim, SJ; Yu, SM, 2020
)
2.34
"Treatment with simvastatin resulted in a significant reduction in the frequency of pain (P = 0·0003), oral analgesic use (P = 0·003) and circulating hs-CRP (P = 0·003), soluble (s)E-selectin (P = 0·01), sICAM-1 (P = 0·02), sICAM-3 (P = 0·02) and sVEGF (P = 0·01)."( Simvastatin reduces vaso-occlusive pain in sickle cell anaemia: a pilot efficacy trial.
Hoppe, C; Jacob, E; Kuypers, F; Larkin, S; Styles, L; Vichinsky, E, 2017
)
2.24
"Treatment with simvastatin for 24h inhibited histamine release in RBL-2H3 cells in a concentration-dependent manner after stimulation with dinitrophenylated bovine serum albumin (DNP-BSA, as an antigen), ionomycin (a calcium ion [Ca"( Inhibition of the mevalonate pathway by simvastatin interferes with mast cell degranulation by disrupting the interaction between Rab27a and double C2 alpha proteins.
Kiyoi, T; Liu, S; Maeyama, K; Sahid, MNA, 2017
)
1.06
"Treatment with simvastatin hindered CRC cell viability and enhanced radiation sensitivity in vitro. "( Simvastatin enhances radiation sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells.
DeVecchio, J; Ferrandon, S; Kalady, MF; Karagkounis, G, 2018
)
2.28
"Treatment with simvastatin demonstrated significant decreases in the concentration of protein, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and lipocalin 2, and the number of polymorphonuclear neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in septic rats."( Experimental Study of the Protective Effect of Simvastatin on Lung Injury in Rats with Sepsis.
Wang, Y; Yang, W; Zhang, R; Zhao, X, 2018
)
1.08
"Treatment with simvastatin, a drug known to preserve endothelial function through an unknown mechanism, improved endothelial cell function by upregulating GATA4 expression in HUVECs exposed to hyperglycemia."( GATA4 protects against hyperglycemia‑induced endothelial dysfunction by regulating NOX4 transcription.
Ni, Y; Sun, Z; Wang, Z; Xu, H; Zheng, L, 2018
)
0.82
"Pretreatment with simvastatin attenuated isoflurane-elicited changes in NSCs and cognitive function."( Simvastatin Attenuates Neurogenetic Damage and Improves Neurocongnitive Deficits Induced by Isoflurane in Neonatal Rats.
Chen, XL; Lei, S; Li, R; Li, WS; Liu, Y; Lu, HX; Lu, P; Lu, Y; Wang, K; Wang, N; Zhang, H; Zhang, PB; Zheng, J, 2018
)
2.25
"Treatment with simvastatin alleviated the sepsis-induced increases in the plasma concentration of intestinal fatty acid binding protein and D-lactic acid, as well as the number of colony-forming units in the bacterial culture of the blood, liver, spleen, and kidney. "( Effect of Simvastatin on the Intestinal Rho/ROCK Signaling Pathway in Rats With Sepsis.
Wang, X; Wang, Y; Yang, W; Zhang, R; Zhao, X, 2018
)
1.24
"Treatment with simvastatin down-regulated Mmp-13 and Il-1β and up-regulated Col2a1 and autophagic activity."( Attenuation of osteoarthritis progression in mice following intra-articular administration of simvastatin-conjugated gelatin hydrogel.
Araki, D; Kuroda, R; Matsumoto, T; Matsushita, T; Nagai, K; Nishida, K; Tabata, Y; Takayama, K; Tanaka, T, 2019
)
1.07
"Treatment with simvastatin stimulated expression of SOX9 and COL2a and enhanced SOX9 protein in human OA chondrocytes."( Simvastatin promotes restoration of chondrocyte morphology and phenotype.
Askew, EB; Cobb, M; Knudson, CB; Knudson, W; Takahashi, N; Terabe, K, 2019
)
2.3
"The treatment with simvastatin (40 mg/die) in HyC (n = 18) significantly reduced total and LDL cholesterol levels, platelet aggregability/activation, ROS production and NO action but did not modify platelet sensitivity to the GLP-1 effects."( Hypercholesterolemia impairs the Glucagon-like peptide 1 action on platelets: Effects of a lipid-lowering treatment with simvastatin.
Barale, C; Cavalot, F; Frascaroli, C; Russo, I, 2019
)
1.04
"Treatment with simvastatin-ezetimibe resulted in lower rates of the primary end point than simvastatin-placebo, including 0.9% for patients younger than 65 years (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.05) and 0.8% for patients 65 to 74 years of age (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87-1.06), with the greatest absolute risk reduction of 8.7% for patients 75 years or older (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90) (P = .02 for interaction)."( Effect of Simvastatin-Ezetimibe Compared With Simvastatin Monotherapy After Acute Coronary Syndrome Among Patients 75 Years or Older: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Bach, RG; Blazing, MA; Bohula, EA; Braunwald, E; Califf, RM; Cannon, CP; Giugliano, RP; Lokhnygina, Y; White, JA, 2019
)
1.26
"Treatment with simvastatin (P<0.001) and simvastatin plus ezetimibe (P<0.001) significantly decreased GLUT4 protein expression in the adipocytes compared to control conditions. "( Coenzyme Q10 ameliorates the reduction in GLUT4 transporter expression induced by simvastatin in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.
Ganesan, S; Ito, MK, 2013
)
0.97
"Treatment with simvastatin significantly reduced the MPO activity in the continuously ventilated lung but had no effect on lung edema after OLV."( Simvastatin attenuates neutrophil recruitment in one-lung ventilation model in rats.
Antunes, E; Braga, Ade F; Camargo, EA; Landucci, EC; Leite, CF; Marangoni, FA; Mussi, RK; Toro, IF, 2013
)
2.17
"Treatment with simvastatin significantly reduced mitochondrial content as well as cell viability which were both rescued by simultaneous treatment with ubiquinol."( Ubiquinol rescues simvastatin-suppression of mitochondrial content, function and metabolism: implications for statin-induced rhabdomyolysis.
Bisoffi, M; Conn, CA; Garcia-Smith, R; Trujillo, KA; Vaughan, RA, 2013
)
1.06
"Treatment with simvastatin significantly reduced MMP-9 levels and the MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio (P < .05) when compared to the placebo group (P > .05)."( Simvastatin therapy decreases MMP-9 levels in obese women.
Andrade, VL; do Valle, IB; Sandrim, VC, 2013
)
2.17
"Pretreatment with simvastatin and mevastatin suppressed this release to basal level, while pravastatin had no effect."( Anti-atherogenic effects of statins: Impact on angiopoietin-2 release from endothelial cells.
Baumgarten, G; Frede, S; Hilbert, T; Hoeft, A; Klaschik, S; Knuefermann, P; Poth, J, 2013
)
0.71
"Treatment with simvastatin resulted in inhibition of the MAPK pathway and exhibited differential effects on the AKT/mTOR pathway in the ECC-1 and Ishikawa cells."( Simvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, exhibits anti-metastatic and anti-tumorigenic effects in endometrial cancer.
Bae-Jump, VL; Gehrig, PA; Gilliam, TP; Han, X; Kim, K; Schointuch, MN; Stine, JE; Zhou, C, 2014
)
2.18
"Treatment with simvastatin plus ezetimibe strongly reduced levels of serum oxysterols and attenuated CKD-dependent atherosclerosis, vascular cell death, vascular calcification, and cardiac dysfunction."( Endoplasmic reticulum stress effector CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP) regulates chronic kidney disease-induced vascular calcification.
Cavasin, MA; Chonchol, M; Demos-Davies, KM; Jablonski, K; Keenan, AL; Kendrick, J; Levi, M; Masuda, M; Masuda, R; McKinsey, TA; Miyazaki, M; Miyazaki-Anzai, S; Saunders, SJ, 2014
)
0.74
"The treatment with simvastatin in induced sepsis showed elevation of creatinine clearance with attenuation of generation of oxidative metabolites, lower severity of acute kidney injury and reduced mortality."( [Antioxidant protection of statins in acute kidney injury induced by sepsis].
Fonseca, CD; Santos, Fdo N; Vasco, CF; Vattimo, Mde F; Watanabe, M, 2014
)
0.73
"Treatment with simvastatin restored sensitivity of BFTC-905-DOXO-II to doxorubicin to that of the parental cell line."( Establishment and characterization of a bladder cancer cell line with enhanced doxorubicin resistance by mevalonate pathway activation.
Greife, A; Hatina, J; Schulz, WA; Scott, SD; Steinhoff, C; Tukova, J, 2015
)
0.76
"Treatment with simvastatin resulted in a significant decrease not only in mPAP and RVHI but also in a 5-HTT level in serum and BALF (P < 0.01 or 0.05) with a good correlation between the 5-HTT level and mPAP or RVHI (r = 0.693 and 0.479; 0.675 and 0.508)."( Simvastatin mitigates functional and structural impairment of lung and right ventricle in a rat model of cigarette smoke-induced COPD.
Jiang, X; Li, Z; Sun, W; Wang, L; Wang, Y; Zhang, L, 2014
)
2.18
"Pre-treatment with simvastatin (S-L) reduced IL-6 (P = 0.02), TNF-α (P = 0.02), and MMP-9 (P = 0.01); post-treatment (L-S) reduced IL-1β (P = 0.02) and TNF-α (P = 0.04), while simultaneous treatment (L+S) did not reduce any of the cytokines tested."( The Effect of Simvastatin on Infection-Induced Inflammatory Response of Human Fetal Membranes.
Basraon, SK; Costantine, MM; Menon, R; Saade, G, 2015
)
1.1
"Treatment with simvastatin seems to be well tolerated with superior antidepressant effects compared to atorvastatin in post-CABG patients. "( Simvastatin versus atorvastatin for improving mild to moderate depression in post-coronary artery bypass graft patients: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.
Abbasi, SH; Akhondzadeh, S; Beglar, AA; Forghani, S; Mohammadinejad, P; Salehiomran, A; Shahmansouri, N; Zeinoddini, A, 2015
)
2.21
"Pretreatment with simvastatin prevented alendronate-induced macroscopic gastric damage and reduced the levels of MDA and GSH, TNF-α and IL-1β, MPO activity, and mucus levels, in the stomach."( Protective Effects of Simvastatin Against Alendronate-Induced Gastric Mucosal Injury in Rats.
Araújo, TS; Carvalho, NS; Costa, DS; Medeiros, JV; Nicolau, LA; Silva, MM; Silva, RO; Soares, PM; Sousa, NA; Souza, LK, 2016
)
1.08
"Treatment with simvastatin in an orthotopic mouse model reduced ovarian tumor growth, coincident with decreased Ki-67, HMGCR, phosphorylated-Akt and phosphorylated-p42/44 protein expression."( The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, simvastatin, exhibits anti-metastatic and anti-tumorigenic effects in ovarian cancer.
Bae-Jump, VL; Gehrig, PA; Gilliam, TP; Guo, H; Han, X; Schointuch, MN; Sheng, X; Stine, JE; Zhou, C, 2016
)
1.06
"Treatment with simvastatin could partly reverse the MPTP-induced changes in ZO-1 expression and reduce MMP-9 protein and activity."( Protective effect of simvastatin on impaired intestine tight junction protein ZO-1 in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease.
Fang, X; Xu, RS, 2015
)
1.08
"Pretreatment by simvastatin and fenofibrate prevented CPB-induced endothelial dysfunction."( Lipid-lowering drugs prevent neurovascular and cognitive consequences of cardiopulmonary bypass.
Amr, G; Azzaoui, R; Bordet, R; Delassus, L; Fossaert, E; Modine, T; Ouk, T; Tailleux, A, 2016
)
0.77
"Treatment with simvastatin significantly attenuated LPS-stimulated production of IL-1β, IL-6, VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 (P < 0.05)."( Simvastatin inhibits the expression of inflammatory cytokines and cell adhesion molecules induced by LPS in human dental pulp cells.
Choi, CH; Hwang, YC; Jung, JY; Kim, WJ; Koh, JT; Lee, BN; Lee, KJ; Min, KS; Nör, JE; Woo, SM, 2017
)
2.24
"Treatment with simvastatin significantly decreased airway inflammation and inflammatory cell infiltration."( Evaluation of Simvastatin and Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Combination Therapy on Airway Remodeling in a Mouse Asthma Model.
Boskabady, MH; Golchoobian, R; Jahromi, GP; Kashani, IR; Mohammadian, M; Nejad, AK; Omidi, A; Sadeghipour, HR, 2016
)
1.13
"Treatment with simvastatin to inhibit HMG CoA reductase, the rate limiting enzyme of this pathway, induced apoptosis in the 28-2 cell line."( Ovarian tumour growth is characterized by mevalonate pathway gene signature in an orthotopic, syngeneic model of epithelial ovarian cancer.
DiMattia, G; Greenaway, JB; Hardy, D; Osz, K; Petrik, J; Revay, T; Shepherd, T; Virtanen, C, 2016
)
0.77
"Treatment with simvastatin of 12 weeks may increase the serum level adiponectin in patients at risk for cardiovascular diseases, but not for the short term treatment of ≤ 8 weeks."( Effects of simvastatin on serum adiponectin: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Bi, M; Chen, W; Huang, Z; Xu, X; Zhao, N, 2017
)
1.2
"Treatment with simvastatin results in rapid and significant improvement of measures of endothelial activation, suggesting a potential role of statins in the treatment of peripheral vascular disease in SSc. "( Simvastatin reduces endothelial activation and damage but is partially ineffective in inducing endothelial repair in systemic sclerosis.
Comina, DP; Cortelezzi, A; Cortiana, M; Del Papa, N; Lucchi, T; Maglione, W; Silvestris, I; Vitali, C, 2008
)
2.14
"Pretreatment with simvastatin and manumycin A clearly affected the activation of Ras promoted by high glucose."( Simvastatin alleviates diabetes-induced VEGF-mediated nephropathy via the modulation of Ras signaling pathway.
Ho, C; Hsu, YC; Lin, CL; Tseng, CC; Wang, FS; Wang, JY, 2008
)
2.11
"Pretreatment with simvastatin protected against alpha-toxin-induced sepsis associated with reduced p53, TNF-alpha, apoptosis, and necrosis."( Apoptosis contributes to septic cardiomyopathy and is improved by simvastatin therapy.
Buerke, M; Buerke, U; Carter, JM; Grandel, U; Grimminger, F; Mueller-Werdan, U; Russ, M; Schlitt, A; Schmidt, H; Seeger, W; Sibelius, U; Werdan, K, 2008
)
0.91
"Treatment with simvastatin did not influence CoQ10 levels and redox status."( Plasma and thrombocyte levels of coenzyme Q10 in children with Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS) and the influence of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
Andler, W; Haas, D; Hoffmann, GF; Menke, T; Niklowitz, P, 2008
)
0.69
"Treatment with simvastatin dose-dependently decreased CSF leukocyte counts, a marker for CNS inflammation."( Simvastatin attenuates leukocyte recruitment in experimental bacterial meningitis.
Angele, B; Koedel, U; Pfister, HW; Winkler, F, 2009
)
2.14
"Pretreatment with simvastatin (10 mg/kg, orally, for 2 weeks) caused significant reduction in gastric mucosal lesions and lipid peroxides associated with a significant increase in gastric juice mucin concentration."( Gastroprotective effect of simvastatin against indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in rats: role of nitric oxide and prostaglandins.
Amin, RS; Hassan, MK; Heeba, GH, 2009
)
0.97
"Pretreatment with simvastatin reduced LPS-induced BALF neutrophilia, myeloperoxidase, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, matrix metalloproteinases 7, 8, and 9, and C-reactive protein (CRP) as well as plasma CRP (all P < 0.05 vs. "( Simvastatin decreases lipopolysaccharide-induced pulmonary inflammation in healthy volunteers.
Backman, JT; Brown, V; Craig, TR; Elborn, JS; Matthay, MA; McAuley, DF; McKeown, ST; O'Kane, CM; Shyamsundar, M; Taggart, CC; Thickett, DR, 2009
)
2.13
"Pretreatment with simvastatin inhibited the induction of CTGF and collagen-Ialpha2, PAI-1 activation, F-actin bundling and FPCL contraction."( Simvastatin impairs smad-3 phosphorylation and modulates transforming growth factor beta1-mediated activation of intestinal fibroblasts.
Burke, JP; Coffey, JC; Docherty, NG; Murphy, M; O'Connell, PR; Watson, RW, 2009
)
2.12
"Treatment with simvastatin alone led to a mean (95% CI) % reduction from baseline in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) of -36% (-27, -46) compared with a reduction of -54% (-44, -63) for anacetrapib co-administered with simvastatin."( Assessment of a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between simvastatin and anacetrapib, a potent cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, in healthy subjects.
Bieberdorf, FA; Chodakewitz, J; Garg, A; Jin, B; Keshavarz, SS; Krishna, R; Wagner, JA, 2009
)
0.92
"Treatment with simvastatin substantially decreased the prevalence of atherosclerotic changes, but otherwise did not change individual serum lipids including LDL cholesterol."( Antiatherogenic effect of simvastatin is not due to decrease of LDL cholesterol in ovariectomized golden Syrian hamster.
Bobková, D; Havlíčková, J; Kovář, J; Pitha, J; Poledne, R, 2010
)
1
"Treatment with simvastatin (20 mg/d) or fenofibrate (267 mg/d) was initiated in all DM patients due to fasting hyperlipemia, and in the AH group."( Postprandial lipemia in diabetic men during hypolipemic therapy.
Kreczyńska, B; Poreba, R; Skoczyńska, A,
)
0.47
"Treatment with simvastatin significantly lowered peripheral blood TC, LDL-C, kidney/body weight ratio, urinary excretion rates of ALB, RBP, and MMP-9 as well as the expression of renal MMP-9 mRNA (p<0.01); however, there was no evident effect on the change of blood glucose and HbA1c levels between group D and group S."( Simvastatin protects diabetic rats against kidney injury through the suppression of renal matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression.
Chen, K; Chen, Y; Li, XC; Wang, YX; Yang, GW; Yao, XM; Ye, SD; Zai, Z, 2010
)
2.14
"Treatment with simvastatin resulted in a significant increase in bowel and mucosal weight in ileum, villus height and crypt depth in jejunum and ileum compared to IR animals. "( Effect of simvastatin on intestinal recovery following gut ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rat.
Bashenko, Y; Chemodanov, E; Coran, AG; Mogilner, J; Shaoul, R; Slijper, N; Sukhotnik, I, 2010
)
1.12
"Treatment with simvastatin prevents gut mucosal damage and inhibits programmed cell death following intestinal IR in a rat."( Effect of simvastatin on intestinal recovery following gut ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rat.
Bashenko, Y; Chemodanov, E; Coran, AG; Mogilner, J; Shaoul, R; Slijper, N; Sukhotnik, I, 2010
)
1.12
"Treatment with simvastatin (vasilip) at a daily dose of 20 mg combined with conventional cardiac therapy was given for 3 months to 132 patients with coronary heart disease and postinfarction cardiosclerosis with dyslipidemia. "( [Correction of antioxidative state during statin therapy of coronary heart disease with dyslipidemia].
Artamoshina, NE; Baĭder, LM; Belaia, OL; Kuropteva, ZV; Radzevich, AE, 2009
)
0.71
"Treatment with simvastatin or β-cyclodextrin, two cholesterol-lowering drugs, reduced the content of ordered domains at the cell surface, which in turn, protected cells against NMDA-mediated excitotoxicity."( Altered cholesterol homeostasis contributes to enhanced excitotoxicity in Huntington's disease.
Alberch, J; Canals, JM; del Toro, D; Humbert, S; Pol, A; Saudou, F; Xifró, X, 2010
)
0.7
"Treatment with simvastatin appears to be safe and may be associated with an improvement in organ dysfunction in ALI. "( A randomized clinical trial of hydroxymethylglutaryl- coenzyme a reductase inhibition for acute lung injury (The HARP Study).
Craig, TR; Duffy, MJ; Elborn, JS; McAuley, DF; McDowell, C; O'Kane, CM; Shyamsundar, M, 2011
)
0.72
"Treatment with simvastatin was associated with significant reductions in serum anti-HSP60, 65, and 70 titers in the dyslipidemic patients (10%, 14%, and 15% decrease, respectively) (p<0.001). "( Simvastatin treatment reduces heat shock protein 60, 65, and 70 antibody titers in dyslipidemic patients: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial.
Akhlaghi, S; Amini, M; Azarpazhooh, MR; Bidmeshgi, S; Daloee, MH; Ferns, GA; Ghayour-Mobarhan, M; Momenzadeh, A; Moohebati, M; Parizadeh, SM; Paydar, R; Rahsepar, AA; Sahebkar, A; Tavallaie, S, 2011
)
2.16
"Treatment with simvastatin attenuated goblet cell hyperplasia, arginase-1 protein expression, and total arginase enzyme activity, but it did not alter airway hydroxyproline content or transforming growth factor-β1."( Simvastatin inhibits goblet cell hyperplasia and lung arginase in a mouse model of allergic asthma: a novel treatment for airway remodeling?
Bratt, JM; Kenyon, NJ; Last, JA; Rabowsky, M; Zeki, AA, 2010
)
2.14
"Treatment with simvastatin significantly inhibited the fibrosis around coronary arteries in Ang II/salt-loading AM(+/-) mice."( Protective effects of statin on cardiac fibrosis and apoptosis in adrenomedullin-knockout mice treated with angiotensin II and high salt loading.
Fukuda, N; Jumabay, M; Matsumoto, K; Matsumoto, T; Saito, K; Shimosawa, T; Soma, M; Ueno, T; Yamamoto, C, 2011
)
0.71
"Treatment with simvastatin triggered the loss of lipid raft localised Rac1 and reduction of Rac1 activity in Mz-ChA-1 cells."( Simvastatin stimulates apoptosis in cholangiocarcinoma by inhibition of Rac1 activity.
Dostal, DE; Glaser, SS; Guerrier, M; Meng, F; Miller, T; Munshi, MK; Priester, S; Wise, CE; Yang, F, 2011
)
2.15
"Pretreatment with simvastatin decreased the severity of ALI in oleic acid and endotoxin ALI models, by decreasing inflammation and oxidative stress."( Long-term simvastatin attenuates lung injury and oxidative stress in murine acute lung injury models induced by oleic Acid and endotoxin.
Altintas, ND; Atilla, P; Iskit, AB; Topeli, A, 2011
)
1.11
"Treatment with simvastatin or atorvastatin resulted in 40 per cent and 80 per cent of patients, respectively, reaching the 2.5 mmol/l goal and 12 per cent and 52 per cent, respectively, reaching the 2.0 mmol/l goal, after 1 year (all p < 0.001 between groups)."( LDL cholesterol goals and cardiovascular risk during statin treatment: the IDEAL study.
Faergeman, O; Fayyad, R; Holme, I; Kastelein, JJ; Larsen, ML; Lindahl, C; Olsson, AG; Pedersen, TR; Tikkanen, MJ, 2011
)
0.71
"Pretreatment of simvastatin significantly decreased eNOS immunoreactivity in the germ cell of the tubules in the rat testes."( Simvastatin induces the expression of hemeoxygenase-1 against ischemia-reperfusion injury on the testes in rats.
Chen, CF; Chen, SC; Chuang, SJ; Hour, TC; Liu, YH; Tu, YP, 2011
)
2.15
"Pre-treatment with simvastatin did not alter IS-induced changes."( Lack of modulatory effect of simvastatin on indoxyl sulfate-induced activation of cultured endothelial cells.
Cheng, CI; Chi, PJ; Chiou, TT; Kuo, CC; Lee, CT; Lee, WC; Lee, YT; Ng, HY; Wu, CH, 2012
)
0.99
"Pretreatment with simvastatin, 10 mg/kg, given orally for 5 days before the ischemia-reperfusion insult, improved the neurologic outcome and preserved more normal motor neurons compared with the control group in a rat model of spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion."( Effect of pretreatment with simvastatin on spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.
Han, JI; Han, S; Hwang, J, 2013
)
1.02
"Treatment with simvastatin and ezetimibe was not associated with less new-onset AF (odds ratio 0.89 [95% CI 0.57-1.97], P = .717)."( Effect of lipid lowering on new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis: the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS) study.
Bang, CN; Boman, K; Egstrup, K; Gohlke-Baerwolf, C; Greve, AM; Køber, L; Nienaber, CA; Ray, S; Rossebø, AB; Wachtell, K, 2012
)
0.93
"Treatment with simvastatin resulted in a decrease in 4-HNE and TNF-α concentration (median 4.18 μg/mg protein vs. "( Simvastatin decreases free radicals formation in the human abdominal aortic aneurysm wall via NF-κB.
Demyanets, S; Domenig, C; Goraca, A; Huk, I; Klinger, M; Mittlboeck, M; Nanobachvili, J; Neumayer, C; Piechota-Polanczyk, A; Wojta, J, 2012
)
2.17
"Treatment with simvastatin 40 mg was an inclusion criterion."( [Lipid therapy in daily routine].
Bestehorn, K; Gitt, AK; Jannowitz, C; Karmann, B; Pittrow, D; Schaefer, JR; Sonntag, F; Weizel, A, 2012
)
0.72
"Treatment with simvastatin markedly inhibited MMP-2, MMP-3, and MMP-9 levels in lung and prevented alveolar destruction."( Prevention of alveolar destruction and airspace enlargement in a mouse model of pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM).
Albelda, SM; Colby, TV; Ducka, B; Fehrenbach, M; Goncharov, DA; Goncharova, EA; Haczku, A; Hino, O; Khavin, I; Krymskaya, VP; Merrilees, MJ, 2012
)
0.72
"Pretreatment with simvastatin decreased the shunt-induced RVSP, MA/TA and F% in pulmonary arteries."( Simvastatin attenuates pulmonary vascular remodelling by down-regulating matrix metalloproteinase-1 and -9 expression in a carotid artery-jugular vein shunt pulmonary hypertension model in rats.
Chen, G; Liang, M; Ma, X; Tang, B; Wang, Z; Wu, Z; Xiong, M; Yao, J, 2012
)
2.15
"Pretreatment with simvastatin prior to and continued throughout smoke exposure reduced the total influx of leukocytes, neutrophils and macrophages into the lung and airways."( Simvastatin inhibits smoke-induced airway epithelial injury: implications for COPD therapy.
Bratt, JM; Davis, BB; Filosto, S; Goldkorn, T; Kenyon, NJ; Pinkerton, KE; Schelegle, ES; Walby, WF; Wang, L; Zeki, AA, 2013
)
2.16
"Treatment with simvastatin improved alveolar bone loss within all of the parameters studied, thus demonstrating anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity. "( Protective mechanisms of simvastatin in experimental periodontal disease.
Brito, GA; Dalcico, R; de Menezes, AM; Deocleciano, OB; Oriá, RB; Ribeiro, RA; Vale, ML, 2013
)
1.05
"Treatment with simvastatin from 3 days before LPS prevented the increase in baseline perfusion pressure and totally normalized the vasodilating response of the liver vasculature to acetylcholine and reduced liver inflammation."( Effects of simvastatin administration on rodents with lipopolysaccharide-induced liver microvascular dysfunction.
Abraldes, JG; Bosch, J; García-Pagán, JC; Gracia-Sancho, J; Hide, D; La Mura, V; Meireles, CZ; Miquel, R; Pasarín, M; Rodríguez-Vilarrupla, A, 2013
)
1.12
"Treatment with simvastatin/ezetimibe 10/10 mg induced no difference in endothelial function in the fasting and postprandial state compared to simvastatin 80 mg while attaining similar LDL-c levels in obese patients with metabolic syndrome."( High-dose statin monotherapy versus low-dose statin/ezetimibe combination on fasting and postprandial lipids and endothelial function in obese patients with the metabolic syndrome: The PANACEA study.
Basart, DC; Coll, B; Deanfield, JE; Imholz, BP; Kastelein, JJ; Spiering, W; Visseren, FL; Westerink, J, 2013
)
0.74
"The treatment of simvastatin down-regulated the formation of microclots in the SAH model and the number of microthrombi decreased significantly in the SAH + simvastatin group as compared with the SAH or SAH + vehicle groups (P < 0.01)."( [Impact of simvastatin on microthrombosis in cortical after subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats and its mechanism].
Chen, G; Wang, Z; Zhu, Y, 2012
)
1.1
"Pretreatment with simvastatin significantly inhibited exotoxin-induced leukocyte rolling from 71+/-10 to 14+/-4.7 cells/min (P<0.01) and adherence from 14+/-3.5 to 0.4+/-0.2 cells (P<0.01)."( Simvastatin inhibits inflammatory properties of Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin.
Buerke, M; Buerke, U; Dahm, M; Darius, H; Grandel, U; Grimminger, F; Makowski, J; Meyer, J; Oelert, H; Pruefer, D; Schnell, M; Seeger, W; Sibelius, U, 2002
)
2.08
"Treatment with simvastatin 20, 40, and 80 mg led to significant reductions in CRP plasma levels versus placebo (p <0.05)."( Effects of simvastatin on C-reactive protein in mixed hyperlipidemic and hypertriglyceridemic patients.
Bays, HE; Maccubbin, DL; Mercuri, M; Mitchel, YB; Shah, AK; Stein, EA, 2002
)
1.04
"Upon treatment, the simvastatin FH group showed significant absolute reductions of total cholesterol (TC) (-2.16 +/- 1.04 mmol/l, 30.1%) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (-2.13 +/- 0.99 mmol/l, 39.8%)."( Early statin therapy restores endothelial function in children with familial hypercholesterolemia.
Bakker, HD; de Jongh, S; Kastelein, JJ; Lilien, MR; op't Roodt, J; Stroes, ES, 2002
)
0.63
"Treatment with simvastatin (20 mg/kg) after MCAO prevented the increase in brain infarct volume occurring at 24 hours and induced a 46.6% reduction after 48 hours."( Treatment with statins after induction of focal ischemia in rats reduces the extent of brain damage.
Asdente, M; Balduini, W; Calvio, AM; Cimino, M; Guerrini, U; Lodetti, B; Paoletti, R; Sironi, L; Tremoli, E, 2003
)
0.66
"Pretreatment with simvastatin reduces neutrophil adhesion to the venous endothelium in patients undergoing coronary surgery, irrespective of its efficacy at lowering cholesterol concentration."( Simvastatin attenuates leucocyte-endothelial interactions after coronary revascularisation with cardiopulmonary bypass.
Chello, M; Covino, E; D'Ambrosio, A; Di Sciascio, G; Mastroroberto, P; Morichetti, MC; Patti, G, 2003
)
2.1
"Treatment with simvastatin was associated with significantly greater reduction of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), while the decrease in triglycerides was significantly greater in patients receiving fenofibrate."( Efficacy of fenofibrate and simvastatin on endothelial function and inflammatory markers in patients with combined hyperlipidemia: relations with baseline lipid profiles.
Chen, MF; Chen, WJ; Cheng, CC; Lee, YT; Lin, JW; Wang, TD, 2003
)
0.95
"Pretreatment with simvastatin, fluvastatin or pravastatin potentiated the TNF-alpha and LPS-induced expression of E-selectin and VCAM-1, and mevalonate reversed the potentiating effect of these statins. "( Effects of statins on adhesion molecule expression in endothelial cells.
de Moerloose, P; Dimitrova, Y; Dunoyer-Geindre, S; Kruithof, EK; Mach, F; Reber, G, 2003
)
0.65
"Treatment with simvastatin markedly reduced retinal permeability (P = 0.014)."( Simvastatin inhibits leukocyte accumulation and vascular permeability in the retinas of rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes.
Hirose, F; Honda, Y; Katsuta, H; Kiryu, J; Miyahara, S; Miyamoto, K; Nishijima, K; Tamura, H; Tsujikawa, A; Yamashiro, K, 2004
)
2.11
"Treatment with simvastatin markedly reduced serum triacylglycerol and cholesterol, and partially controlled hyperglycemia in diabetic animals."( Effects of simvastatin treatment on oxidant/antioxidant state and ultrastructure of diabetic rat myocardium.
Aktan, F; Can, B; Ceylan, A; Güven, C; Karasu, C; Ozansoy, G, 2003
)
1.05
"Mice treated with simvastatin and rendered septic by cecal ligation and perforation (CLP) show a mean survival time close to 4 times the value found in untreated mice. "( HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin profoundly improves survival in a murine model of sepsis.
Hanrath, P; Janssens, U; Liehn, EA; Lütticken, R; Merx, MW; Schrader, J; Weber, C, 2004
)
0.95
"Pretreatment with simvastatin (30 or 60 mg/kg) markedly attenuated inhibition of vasodilator responses to ACh, the increased level of TNF-alpha and the decreased level of NO by LDL, but no effect on serum concentration of endogenous ADMA."( Effect of simvastatin on endothelium-dependent vaso-relaxation and endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor.
Deng, HW; Jiang, DJ; Jiang, JL; Li, NS; Li, YJ; Tang, YH, 2004
)
1.05
"Treatment with simvastatin did not alter ex vivo T-lymphocyte proliferation."( Simvastatin inhibits lymphocyte function in normal subjects and patients with cardiovascular disease.
Cameron, AJ; Hillyard, DZ; Jardine, AG; MacIntyre, A; McDonald, KJ; Panarelli, M; Shiels, PG; Thomson, J, 2004
)
2.11
"Treatment with simvastatin might downregulate enhanced CD40L-CD40 interactions in CAPD patients."( Increased soluble CD40L levels are reduced by long-term simvastatin treatment in peritoneally dialyzed patients.
Hryszko, T; Malyszko, J; Malyszko, JS; Mysliwiec, M, 2004
)
0.91
"Pretreatment of simvastatin suppressed the hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis of cultured cardiomyocytes from neonatal rats."( Statins initiated after hypertrophy inhibit oxidative stress and prevent heart failure in rats with aortic stenosis.
Chen, MS; Luo, JD; Wang, YZ; Xu, FP; Yi, Q; Zhang, GP; Zhang, HQ, 2004
)
0.66
"Treatment with simvastatin significantly (p<0.05) reduced total cholesterol, total triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)."( The effect of simvastatin therapy on hemorheological profile in coronary heart desease (CHD) patients.
Muravyov, AV; Petrochenko, A; Surovaya, L; Yakusevich, VV, 2004
)
1.02
"Pretreatment with simvastatin significantly reduces the increase of ICAM-1 and ELAM-1 after coronary artery bypass surgery, by a mechanism that seems not related to its efficacy in lowering cholesterol levels."( Simvastatin blunts the increase of circulating adhesion molecules after coronary artery bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.
Agrò, F; Carassiti, M; Chello, M; Colonna, D; Covino, E; Mastroroberto, P; Pugliese, G, 2004
)
2.1
"Treatment with simvastatin resulted in dose-dependent reductions of fasting LDL-cholesterol, without changing cholesterol levels in the VLDL-1, VLDL-2 and IDL fractions."( Effects of increasing doses of simvastatin on fasting lipoprotein subfractions, and the effect of high-dose simvastatin on postprandial chylomicron remnant clearance in normotriglyceridemic patients with premature coronary sclerosis.
Buirma, R; Castro Cabezas, M; De Jaegere, PP; Halkes, CJ; Plokker, HW; van der Helm, YJ; van Tol, A; van Wijk, JP, 2005
)
0.95
"Treatment with simvastatin also induced a significant increase in apoA-I production rate compared to atorvastatin (15.2 +/- 3.0 mg/kg/d versus 13.2 +/- 2.6 mg/kg/d, P = 0.05)."( Comparison of the impact of atorvastatin and simvastatin on apoA-I kinetics in men.
Couture, P; Lamarche, B; Mauger, JF; Paradis, ME, 2005
)
0.93
"Treatment with simvastatin had no effect on serum cholesterol levels in either normal or hypercholesterolemic mice."( Treatment with simvastatin suppresses the development of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysms in normal and hypercholesterolemic mice.
Buckley, C; Ennis, TL; Goeddel, LA; Hawkins, CJ; Mao, D; Shames, ML; Steinmetz, EF; Thompson, RW; Vanvickle-Chavez, SJ, 2005
)
1.02
"Treatment with simvastatin suppresses the development of experimental AAAs in both normal and hypercholesterolemic mice. "( Treatment with simvastatin suppresses the development of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysms in normal and hypercholesterolemic mice.
Buckley, C; Ennis, TL; Goeddel, LA; Hawkins, CJ; Mao, D; Shames, ML; Steinmetz, EF; Thompson, RW; Vanvickle-Chavez, SJ, 2005
)
1.03
"Treatment with simvastatin significantly reduced the levels of iNOS mRNA and protein in cytokine-treated rat H9c2 cardiac embryonic myoblasts."( Simvastatin attenuates expression of cytokine-inducible nitric-oxide synthase in embryonic cardiac myoblasts.
De Caterina, A; De Caterina, R; Di Napoli, P; Felaco, M; Geng, YJ; Grilli, A; Madonna, R; Massaro, M; Tang, D, 2005
)
2.11
"Treatment with simvastatin enhanced the bradykinin-induced endothelium-dependent relaxation in the mesenteric artery, whereas it had no effect on the bradykinin-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in endothelial cells of the aortic valves."( Long-term inhibition of RhoA attenuates vascular contractility by enhancing endothelial NO production in an intact rabbit mesenteric artery.
Hirano, K; Hirano, M; Kanaide, H; Nawata, H; Nishimura, J; Shiga, N, 2005
)
0.67
"Treatment with simvastatin also improved neurological deficits and reduced brain edema significantly (P < 0.05)."( Simvastatin reduced ischemic brain injury and perfusion deficits in an embolic model of stroke.
Shabanzadeh, AP; Shuaib, A; Wang, CX, 2005
)
2.11
"Treatment with simvastatin for only 3 days results in a 24% drop in the LDL-C level. "( Cholesterol levels after 3 days of high-dose simvastatin in patients at moderate to high risk for coronary events.
Citkowitz, E; Michelena, HI; Osorio, LA, 2005
)
0.94
"Treatment with simvastatin, a hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, for 24 hours attenuated the transient [Ca2+]i elevation induced by thrombin. "( Rac1 regulation of surface expression of protease-activated receptor-1 and responsiveness to thrombin in vascular smooth muscle cells.
Bi, D; Hirano, K; Hirano, M; Iwamoto, Y; Kanaide, H; Nishimura, J; Yufu, T, 2005
)
0.68
"Treatment with simvastatin decreased lens Ubs of both SD and CT rats by about 20%."( Concentration and distribution of ubiquinone (coenzyme Q), the endogenous lipid antioxidant, in the rat lens: effect of treatment with simvastatin.
Cenedella, RJ; Neely, AR; Sexton, P, 2005
)
0.87
"Pretreatment with simvastatin reduces the severity of acute lung injury induced by intestinal I/R in rats."( Pretreatment with simvastatin reduces lung injury related to intestinal ischemia-reperfusion in rats.
Aldemir, D; Arslan, G; Candan, S; Ozen, O; Pirat, A; Yücel, M; Zeyneloglu, P, 2006
)
0.99
"Treatment with simvastatin effectively reduced the elevated levels of TG-rich lipoproteins and improved LDL composition in patients with type 2 diabetes. "( The effect of simvastatin on triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in patients with type 2 diabetic dyslipidemia: a SILHOUETTE trial sub-study.
Battisti, WP; Dobs, A; Miller, M; Palmisano, J; Yuan, Z, 2006
)
1.05
"Pre-treatment with simvastatin abolished the ischemia-induced activation of NF-kB observed in vehicle-treated animals."( Activation of NF-kB and ERK1/2 after permanent focal ischemia is abolished by simvastatin treatment.
Banfi, C; Brioschi, M; Cimino, M; Gelosa, P; Gianella, A; Guerrini, U; Nobili, E; Paoletti, R; Sironi, L; Tremoli, E, 2006
)
0.88
"Treatment with simvastatin showed a significant decrement in plasma total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels (p<0.05). "( Simvastatin treatment improves endothelial function and increases fibrinolysis in patients with hypercholestrolemia.
Aksoyek, S; Atalar, E; Beyazit, Y; Guven, GS; Haznedaroglu, IC; Kekilli, M; Kilicarslan, A; Oz, G; Ozer, N; Sahiner, L; Sozen, T; Yavuz, B, 2006
)
2.13
"Treatment with simvastatin led to a significant reduction (P < .005) of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol."( Simvastatin does not exhibit therapeutic anti-inflammatory effects in asthma.
Barnes, M; Fleming, D; Lipworth, BJ; Meldrum, KT; Menzies, D; Nair, A, 2007
)
2.12
"Pre-treatment with simvastatin, a clinically relevant statin that penetrates the brain, protected against Abeta(1-42) induced synapse damage and neuronal death in vitro."( Squalestatin protects neurons and reduces the activation of cytoplasmic phospholipase A2 by Abeta(1-42).
Bate, C; Williams, A, 2007
)
0.66
"Treatment with simvastatin was associated with a significant reduction in mean (SD) membrane lipid peroxidation both preoperatively and at 24 hours postoperatively compared with placebo (preoperative MDA: 0.07 [0.01] vs 0.10 [0.02] nmol/mL, respectively; P < 0.05; postoperative MDA: 0.10 [0.04] vs 0.21 [0.01] nmol/mL; P < 0.05)."( The effect of simvastatin on erythrocyte membrane fluidity during oxidative stress induced by cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized controlled study.
Chello, M; Coccia, R; Covino, E; Foppoli, C; Lusini, M; Perluigi, M; Spadaccio, C, 2007
)
1.04
"Pre-treatment with simvastatin significantly attenuated the CRP-induced CD32 expression and NF-kappaB activation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. "( Simvastatin inhibits C-reactive protein-induced pro-inflammatory changes in endothelial cells by decreasing mevalonate pathway products.
Lai, LP; Liang, YJ; Shyu, KG; Wang, BW, 2008
)
2.12
"Treatment with simvastatin significantly attenuated RhoA activation in the kidney cortices of db/db mice and resulted in a significant reduction of albuminuria and mesangial matrix expansion."( Targeting of RhoA/ROCK signaling ameliorates progression of diabetic nephropathy independent of glucose control.
Danesh, FR; Kolavennu, V; Peng, H; Wang, Y; Zeng, L, 2008
)
0.69
"Treatment with simvastatin concentration-dependently inhibited platelet aggregation induced by collagen or arachidonic acid with an IC(50) range of 52-158 microM. "( Enhanced nitric oxide and cyclic GMP formation plays a role in the anti-platelet activity of simvastatin.
Chou, TC; Chu, KM; Lin, YF; Wu, WC, 2008
)
0.92
"Rats treated with simvastatin exhibited a significant increase in media thickness and a significant reduction in aneurysmal size compared with control rats. "( Simvastatin suppresses the progression of experimentally induced cerebral aneurysms in rats.
Aoki, T; Hashimoto, N; Ishibashi, R; Kataoka, H; Nozaki, K, 2008
)
2.12
"Treatment with simvastatin suppresses the development of CAs by inhibiting inflammatory reactions in aneurysmal walls. "( Simvastatin suppresses the progression of experimentally induced cerebral aneurysms in rats.
Aoki, T; Hashimoto, N; Ishibashi, R; Kataoka, H; Nozaki, K, 2008
)
2.14
"Pretreatment with simvastatin could attenuate these changes and reverse this electrical remodeling without lowering the serum cholesterol level, contributing to the ionic mechanism of statin in treatment of arrhythmia independent of a decrease in cholesterol."( Cardioprotective effects of simvastatin on reversing electrical remodeling induced by myocardial ischemia-reperfusion in normocholesterolemic rabbits.
Chen, HX; Ding, C; Fu, XH; He, ZS; Li, JX; Xue, L, 2008
)
0.96
"Mice treated with simvastatin, but not fluvastatin, did not demonstrate the prevention of Abeta-induced memory impairment, and showed no significant decrease in oxidative stress."( Prevention of amyloid beta-induced memory impairment by fluvastatin, associated with the decrease in amyloid beta accumulation and oxidative stress in amyloid beta injection mouse model.
Kurinami, H; Morishita, R; Ogihara, T; Sato, N; Shimamura, M; Shinohara, M; Takeda, S; Takeuchi, D, 2008
)
0.67
"Treatment with simvastatin in increasing doses over a period of three months (13 patients received 40 mg/day and 5 patients 20 mg/day at the end of the third month) reduced LDL-cholesterol in both groups of patients (35% and 54%) as well as apolipoprotein B (apoB) (31% and 46%) significantly, but Lp(a) levels were not influenced (57 +/- 21 vs 59 +/- 20 and 50 +/- 14 vs 53 +/- 16 mg/dl, respectively)."( Effects of simvastatin on lipoprotein (a) and lipoprotein composition in patients with nephrotic syndrome.
Böhler, J; Eckardt, HG; Schollmeyer, P; Wanner, C; Wieland, H, 1994
)
1.02
"Treatment with simvastatin did not change delta 6 desaturation in either phenotype but increased delta 5 desaturation in obese rats to reach the unchanged rate observed in lean animals."( Effect of simvastatin on desaturase activities in liver from lean and obese Zucker rats.
Bézard, J; Blond, JP; Georges, B; Maniongui, C, 1993
)
1.03
"Treatment with simvastatin reduced plasma cholesterol level by 16% (mean +/- SEM, 8.1 +/- 0.8 v 6.8 +/- 0.8 mmol/L; P < .05) and plasma apolipoprotein (apo) B level by 19% (1.6 +/- 0.2 v 1.3 +/- 0.2 g/L; P < .05)."( Simvastatin improves chylomicron remnant removal in familial combined hyperlipidemia without changing chylomicron conversion.
Cabezas, MC; de Bruin, TW; Erkelens, DW; Jansen, H; Kock, LA; Kortlandt, W; Van Linde-Sibenius Trip, M, 1993
)
2.07
"Rats treated with simvastatin or pravastatin exhibited a reduction in the incorporation of [2-(14)C] acetate into liver cholesterol and displayed lower plasma mevalonate levels as compared to control animals."( Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis and hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl--CoA reductase in rats by simvastatin and pravastatin.
Del Puppo, M; Galli Kienle, M; Rauli, S, 1995
)
0.83
"Treatment with simvastatin was associated with an increase in the arachidonic acid content of the erythrocyte membrane from 12.2 to 15.3 mole% (P < 0.05)."( Effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition on erythrocyte membrane cholesterol and acyl chain composition.
Dwight, JF; Hendry, BM; Mendes Ribeiro, AC, 1996
)
0.63
"Treatment with simvastatin modulated most of the altered parameters affected during HC that might be, in part, due to inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis."( Efficacy of simvastatin and pumpkin-seed oil in the management of dietary-induced hypercholesterolemia.
Abd el Latif, HA; Abd el-Fattah, AA; al-Zuhair, H, 1997
)
1.02
"Treatment with simvastatin 20 mg daily for 9 days decreased both variables by approximately 50%, the nadir of plasma MVA occurring on the second day and of the L/C ratio on the fifth day, and resulted in a 39% reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol."( Use of cholesterol precursors to assess changes in cholesterol synthesis under non-steady-state conditions.
Kim, KD; Naoumova, RP; Pfohl, M; Thompson, GR, 1998
)
0.64
"Treatment with simvastatin decreased the rapid reappearance of total cholesterol noted during the first 2 days after lipid removal but without any major effect on the subsequent reaccumulation of cholesterol."( Weekly versus biweekly lipid removal and effect of statins in severe hypercholesterolemia.
Bianchetti, MG; Nuoffer, JM; Pfammatter, JP; Wiesmann, UN; Zenklusen, JM, 1998
)
0.64
"Treatment with simvastatin 20 mg/d for 12 weeks (n = 194) resulted in significantly greater reductions in plasma total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (25.7% and 33.6%, respectively) compared with pravastatin 40 mg/d for 12 weeks (n = 193) (19.0% and 26.3%, respectively) (P<0.001)."( Double-masked comparison of the quality of life of hypercholesterolemic men treated with simvastatin or pravastatin. International Quality of Life Multicenter Group.
Seed, M; Weir, MR, 1999
)
0.86
"Pretreatment with simvastatin (1 microg/ml) reduced total cholesterol content in SMC."( Simvastatin enhanced sodium nitroprusside-induced apoptosis of smooth muscle cells. An involvement of geranylgeraniol.
Fujita, H; Ishikawa, K; Morita, I; Murota, S; Shimotsuura, S; Yanagisawa, A, 2000
)
2.07
"Treatment with simvastatin for patients with cardiovascular disease is cost-effective for men and women, with or without diabetes."( Cost-effectiveness of treating hyperlipidemia in the presence of diabetes : who should be treated?
Coupal, L; Dorais, M; Grover, SA; Zowall, H, 2000
)
0.65
"Treatment with simvastatin causes a reduction of events of new-onset heart failure, but this may be attributable to properties other than its lipid-lowering effects."( The endotoxin-lipoprotein hypothesis.
Anker, SD; Coats, AJ; Rauchhaus, M, 2000
)
0.65
"Treatment with simvastatin significantly reduced fasting and postprandial remnant lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations (13+/-3 mg/dL and 136+/-53 mg."( High dose of simvastatin normalizes postprandial remnant-like particle response in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.
Cabezas, MC; Dallinga-Thie, GM; de Valk, HW; Erkelens, DW; Jansen, H; Schreuder, PC; Twickler, TB, 2000
)
1.02
"Treatment with simvastatin (20-80 mg) produced statistically significant improvements in all measured lipid variables by the end of the study."( Attaining United States and European guideline LDL-cholesterol levels with simvastatin in patients with coronary heart disease (the GOALLS study).
Adams, PC; Brown, AS; Garmendia, F; Reiber, I, 2000
)
0.88
"Treatment with simvastatin or bezafibrate in addition to HRT should be considered in cases of postmenopausal hypercholesterolemia in which HRT alone fails to lower the serum lipoprotein levels."( Effects of bezafibrate and simvastatin on plasma lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemia resistant to hormone replacement therapy.
Adachi, K; Azuma, C; Hayakawa, J; Ikegami, H; Kurachi, H; Matumoto, K; Morishige, K; Murata, Y; Nishio, Y; Node, K; Ohmichi, M; Tasaka, K, 2001
)
0.96
"Treatment with simvastatin 40 and 80 mg/day, but not atorvastatin 20 and 40 mg/day, led to significant (p < 0.05) reductions in BSAP in both men (4.1-5.4% reduction) and women (4.2-7.4% reduction)."( Effects of statins on biomarkers of bone metabolism: a randomised trial.
Farnier, M; Mercuri, M; Stein, EA; Waldstreicher, J, 2001
)
0.65
"Treatment with simvastatin had favorable effects on the lipid profile, producing significant percentage changes from baseline in all parameters (P < 0.001)."( STATT: a titrate-to-goal study of simvastatin in Asian patients with coronary heart disease. Simvastatin Treats Asians to Target.
Cai, NS; Cho, SY; Choi, DH; Chung, N; Fan, WF; Koh, KK; Lee, K; Lee, PY; Lee, S; Lee, SH; Panchavinnin, P; Phankingthongkum, R; Sangwatanaroj, S; Son, JW; Wang, JJ; Yin, WH; Young, MS; Zhu, JR, 2001
)
0.93
"Treatment with simvastatin decreased fasting and postprandial C3 by 6% and 39%, respectively (P<0.05 for both versus no treatment)."( Postprandial increase of complement component 3 in normolipidemic patients with coronary artery disease: effects of expanded-dose simvastatin.
Castro Cabezas, M; de Jaegere, PP; Erkelens, DW; Halkes, CJ; Plokker, HW; van Der Helm, Y; van Dijk, H, 2001
)
0.86
"Pretreatment with simvastatin attenuated myocardial injury after 30 minutes of myocardial ischemia and 24 hours of reperfusion."( Pretreatment with simvastatin attenuates myocardial dysfunction after ischemia and chronic reperfusion.
Jones, SP; Lefer, DJ; Trocha, SD, 2001
)
0.97
"Treatment by simvastatin or cerivastatin restored impaired metabolism of exogenous ATP and ADP in thrombin-activated endothelial cells by preventing thrombin-induced downregulation of CD39/ATPDase."( Reversal of thrombin-induced deactivation of CD39/ATPDase in endothelial cells by HMG-CoA reductase inhibition: effects on Rho-GTPase and adenosine nucleotide metabolism.
Balduini, CL; Dunzendorfer, S; Egger, P; Gritti, D; Kaneider, NC; Noris, P; Ricevuti, G; Wiedermann, CJ, 2002
)
0.67
"Treatment with simvastatin (40 mg/d) effectively lowered LDL-C by 34.3% (P < 0.001)."( Lowering low density lipoprotein cholesterol with simvastatin, a hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme a reductase inhibitor, does not affect luteal function in premenopausal women.
Burkman, R; Liu, M; Miller, S; Mitchel, Y; Nakajima, S; Peskin, E; Plotkin, D; Richardson, D; Santoro, N; Shapiro, D; Waldstreicher, J, 2002
)
0.91
"Treatment with simvastatin reduced concentrations of LDL cholesterol to 194, 168 and 156 mg/dl, respectively, on doses of 20, 40 and 80 mg/day."( Comparative hypolipidemic effects of lovastatin and simvastatin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.
Bacon, S; Illingworth, DR; Pappu, AS; Sexton, GJ, 1992
)
0.87
"Treatment with simvastatin, an inhibitor of cholesterol synthesis, reverses the hyperlipidaemia and enables o,p'DDD therapy to be maintained without increasing cardiovascular risk."( Possible mechanism and treatment of o,p'DDD-induced hypercholesterolaemia.
Anderson, JV; Besser, GM; Maher, VM; Scoppola, A; Thompson, GR; Trainer, PJ, 1992
)
0.62
"On treatment with simvastatin 10 mg O.D., the plasma HDL2b and HDL3a concentrations increased by 30% (P less than 0.001) and 12% (P less than 0.01) respectively."( Plasma high density lipoprotein particle size alteration by simvastatin treatment in patients with hypercholesterolaemia.
Johansson, J; Mölgaard, J; Olsson, AG, 1991
)
0.85
"Treatment with simvastatin or gemfibrozil in hypertensive patients in hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy can reduce total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol plasma levels, while significantly increasing HDL plasma levels compared to placebo."( [Simvastatin versus gemfibrozil in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia in hypertensive patients treated with hydrochlorothiazide].
Bentivoglio, M; Berioli, S; Conti, R; Corea, L; Osanna, RA; Savino, K; Zollino, L, 1990
)
1.53
"Treatment with simvastatin reduced cholesterol levels from 6.85 to 4.75 mmol/l (P less than 0.001), triglycerides from 2.7 to 2.1 mmol/l (P less than 0.01), low-density lipoproteins from 4.6 to 2.6 mmol/l (P less than 0.001) and high-density lipoproteins rose from 1.09 to 1.18 mmol/l (P less than 0.01)."( Simvastatin in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in patients with essential hypertension.
Anderson, A; Hopper, J; Macaskill, G; McDonald, P; Morgan, T, 1990
)
2.06
"Treatment with simvastatin decreases the atherogenic potential of plasma more than cholestyramine monotherapy and causes fewer adverse effects."( Clinical experience with simvastatin compared with cholestyramine.
Baggen, MG; Erkelens, DW; Kettner, M; Koningsberger, JC; Mol, MJ; Van Doormaal, JJ, 1988
)
0.92

Toxicity

Simvastatin is an effective and safe drug with excellent tolerability. It comprises a safe and efficient choice for dyslipidemia treatment in high-risk and diabetic patients. The Netherlands Centre for Monitoring of Adverse Reactions to Drugs received 142 reports of suspected adverse reactions to simvastATins.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"to investigate the symptomatic and biochemical side effect profile of simvastatin (a new cholesterol lowering drug) following routine use in a specialist hospital outpatient clinic."( Simvastatin and side effects.
Lintott, CJ; Scott, RS; Wilson, MJ, 1991
)
1.96
" It is concluded that simvastatin is a safe and efficient cholesterol-lowering drug for long-term therapy, both as a single drug and in combination with cholestyramine."( Long-term efficacy and safety of simvastatin alone and in combination therapy in treatment of hypercholesterolaemia.
Lundh, BL; Mölgaard, J; Olsson, AG; von Schenck, H, 1991
)
0.88
" The most frequently reported drug-related clinical adverse experiences were constipation (2."( Long-term safety and efficacy profile of simvastatin.
Bocanegra, TS; Boccuzzi, SJ; Keegan, ME; Shapiro, DR; Walker, JF, 1991
)
0.55
" The most serious side-effect in our study was myolysis which occurred in two patients with a marked increase in creatine phosphokinase."( Efficacy and safety of simvastatin (alone or in association with cholestyramine). A 1-year study in 66 patients with type II hyperlipoproteinaemia.
Aubert, I; Bauduceau, B; Chanu, B; Dachet, C; Emmerich, J; Erlich, D; Gautier, D; Jacotot, B; Rouffy, J, 1990
)
0.59
" No consistent adverse clinical or biochemical effects were observed during the three-year therapy."( [Evaluation of tolerance, efficacy and safety of 3-year simvastatin use in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia].
Bercher, L; Bovet, P; Brunner, HR; Darioli, R, 1990
)
0.53
" Our observations provide good evidence that lovastatin and simvastatin have no undesirable toxic effects on the lens and other ocular tissues, compared with fenofibrate."( Ocular drug safety and HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors.
Hockwin, O; Paulus, U; Schmidt, J; Schmitt, C; von Bergmann, K, 1994
)
0.53
""Is there any safe and optimal treatment of hyperlipidemia following heart transplantation?" The problem of hypercholesterolemia following heart transplantation if often underestimated."( [Can hyperlipidemia after heart transplantation be optimally and safely treated?].
Arndtz, N; Reichart, B; Seidel, D; Thiery, J; Wenke, K, 1994
)
0.29
" There were no differences between the treatment groups in the numbers of reports of 'possible adverse effects' of treatment or of a range of different symptoms or conditions (including those related to sleep or mood) recorded at regular clinic follow-up."( Three-year follow-up of the Oxford Cholesterol Study: assessment of the efficacy and safety of simvastatin in preparation for a large mortality study.
Armitage, J; Collins, R; Fatemian, M; Kearney, E; Keech, A; Lawson, A; Lyon, V; MacMahon, S; Mindell, J; Wallendszus, K, 1994
)
0.51
" This short-term study showed few adverse effects for both drugs."( Comparative efficacy and safety of micronized fenofibrate and simvastatin in patients with primary type IIa or IIb hyperlipidemia.
Bonnefous, F; Debbas, N; Farnier, M; Irvine, A, 1994
)
0.53
" Adverse experiences were mild and did not differ between treatment groups; in each group, one subject discontinued medication because of complaints of dizziness."( Treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia. Short-term efficacy and safety of increasing doses of simvastatin and pravastatin: a double-blind comparative study.
De Haan, AF; Kastelein, JJ; Kortmann, B; Kroon, AA; Lansberg, PJ; Stalenhoef, AF; Stuyt, PM, 1993
)
0.5
" Compliance with prescribed medication was very good and the drug was well tolerated; only 3% of patients manifested a clinical adverse experience requiring discontinuation or a clinical adverse experience described as serious (associated with hospitalization or serious disability)."( Simvastatin in severe primary hypercholesterolemia: efficacy, safety, and tolerability in 595 patients over 18 weeks. The Principal Investigators.
Simons, LA, 1993
)
1.73
"Between December 1989 and December 1992, the Netherlands Centre for Monitoring of Adverse Reactions to Drugs received 142 reports of suspected adverse reactions to simvastatin or pravastatin."( [Side effects of cholesterol synthesis inhibitors].
Stricker, BH; Wolterbeek, R, 1993
)
0.48
" There was no significant difference between groups in the frequency of drug-related adverse experiences."( Comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of simvastatin and pravastatin for hypercholesterolemia. The Simvastatin Pravastatin Study Group.
, 1993
)
0.53
" Relevant data on the incidence of adverse effects are presented."( Comparative evaluation of the safety and efficacy of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor monotherapy in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia.
Hsu, I; Johnson, NE; Spinler, SA,
)
0.13
"We sought to identify differences in the description of adverse drug experiences in reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from the United States and Japan, using diclofenac and simvastatin as test drugs."( Japanese and American reports of randomized trials: differences in the reporting of adverse effects.
Hayashi, K; Walker, AM, 1996
)
0.49
"Oxidized low density lipoproteins (OxLDL) are toxic to cells of the arterial wall and trigger the expression of the inducible form of hsp 70 in cultured endothelial cells (EAhy-926) and smooth muscle cells (HUVSMC)."( Simvastatin modulates the heat shock response and cytotoxicity mediated by oxidized LDL in cultured human endothelial smooth muscle cells.
Catapano, AL; Jacoviello, C; Longoni, C; Pirillo, A; Radaelli, A, 1997
)
1.74
" No serious adverse events were considered associated with treatment."( A multicenter, double-blind, one-year study comparing safety and efficacy of atorvastatin versus simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Best, J; Black, D; Bracs, P; d'Emden, M; Dart, A; Hamilton-Craig, I; Jerums, G; Nicholson, G; Sullivan, D; Tallis, G; West, M, 1997
)
0.51
" Results of this study confirmed that a low dose (10 mg) of simvastatin daily is a safe and effective method of reducing plasma levels of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive elderly patients receiving concurrent antihypertensive drug therapy, and that it has the additional potential benefit of reducing plasma levels of insulin."( Short-term safety and efficacy of low-dose simvastatin in elderly patients with hypertensive hypercholesterolemia and fasting hyperinsulinemia.
Chan, P; Huang, TY; Lee, C; Lee, YS; Tomlinson, B, 1997
)
0.8
" Physical and laboratory investigations for adverse effects were performed every month for the first 3 months and every 3 months thereafter."( Safety and efficacy of long-term statin-fibrate combinations in patients with refractory familial combined hyperlipidemia.
Athyros, VG; Carina, MV; Didangelos, TP; Hatzikonstandinou, HA; Kontopoulos, AG; Kranitsas, DF; Papageorgiou, AA, 1997
)
0.3
" Atorvastatin was well-tolerated, and no serious or medically important adverse events were observed."( Efficacy and safety of a new cholesterol synthesis inhibitor, atorvastatin, in comparison with simvastatin and pravastatin, in subjects with hypercholesterolemia.
Black, DM; Mahla, G; Muller, D; Pentrup, A; Wolffenbuttel, BH, 1998
)
0.52
"We conclude that atorvastatin is a safe and very efficacious cholesterol-lowering agent, which also possesses significant triglyceride-lowering properties."( Efficacy and safety of a new cholesterol synthesis inhibitor, atorvastatin, in comparison with simvastatin and pravastatin, in subjects with hypercholesterolemia.
Black, DM; Mahla, G; Muller, D; Pentrup, A; Wolffenbuttel, BH, 1998
)
0.52
" There was no significant difference between the incidence of adverse effects with cerivastatin and comparator statins or between cerivastatin and other statins with respect to clinically significant increases in either hepatic enzymes or creatine phosphokinase."( Clinical efficacy and safety of cerivastatin: summary of pivotal phase IIb/III studies.
Davignon, J; Hanefeld, M; Hunninghake, DB; Insull, W; Nakaya, N; Ose, L, 1998
)
0.3
" Gemfibrozil treatment was also withdrawn significantly more frequently due to a possible adverse reaction compared with the other two drugs."( A comparison of the use, effectiveness and safety of bezafibrate, gemfibrozil and simvastatin in normal clinical practice using the New Zealand Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme (IMMP).
Beggs, PW; Clark, DW; Coulter, DM; Williams, SM, 1999
)
0.53
"In normal clinical practice in New Zealand gemfibrozil appears less effective and more frequently causes adverse effects leading to withdrawal of treatment than either bezafibrate or simvastatin."( A comparison of the use, effectiveness and safety of bezafibrate, gemfibrozil and simvastatin in normal clinical practice using the New Zealand Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme (IMMP).
Beggs, PW; Clark, DW; Coulter, DM; Williams, SM, 1999
)
0.72
" This 10-year study demonstrates that simvastatin is an effective and safe drug with excellent tolerability with only few minor side effects, and causes a pronounced and persistent cholesterol-lowering effect during long-term treatment of hypercholesterolemic patients at risk."( Efficacy and safety of simvastatin for high-risk hypercholesterolemia.
Mölgaard, J; Olsson, AG; Wärjerstam-Elf, S, 1999
)
0.89
" Treatments were well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse effects was similar in both groups."( Efficacy and safety of cerivastatin in primary hypercholesterolemia: a long term comparative titration study with simvastatin.
Hanna, K; Leiter, LA, 1999
)
0.51
" Adverse event rates were statistically equivalent (p<0."( Safety of low-density lipoprotein cholestrol reduction with atorvastatin versus simvastatin in a coronary heart disease population (the TARGET TANGIBLE trial).
Klein, G; März, W; Neiss, A; Wehling, M; Wollschläger, H, 1999
)
0.53
" The frequency of treatment-associated adverse events (AEs) in the atorvastatin LDL-C < or =80 mg/dl (2."( Safety profile of atorvastatin-treated patients with low LDL-cholesterol levels.
Bakker-Arkema, RG; Black, DM; Nawrocki, JW, 2000
)
0.31
" No new or unexpected adverse events were observed and the overall clinical event profiles were similar in the two groups."( Lipid-altering efficacy and safety of simvastatin 80 mg/day: worldwide long-term experience in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Bays, H; Bertolami, M; Campodónico, S; Davidson, MH; Dujovne, CA; Escobar, ID; Hunninghake, DB; Insull, W; Kastelein, JJ; Kush, D; Melino, MR; Mercuri, M; Mitchel, YB; Ose, L; Schrott, HG; Scott, RS; Stein, EA; Stepanavage, ME; Tate, AC; Weiss, SR; Wu, M, 2000
)
0.58
" Fewer than 6% of patients in either treatment group experienced drug-attributable adverse events, which were mostly mild to moderate in nature."( Comparison of efficacy and safety of atorvastatin (10mg) with simvastatin (10mg) at six weeks. ASSET Investigators.
Goldner, D; Insull, W; Kafonek, S; Zieve, F, 2001
)
0.55
" Adverse events occurred in 3% of patients, and included myositis (0."( Lipid-lowering efficacy, safety, and costs of a large-scale therapeutic statin formulary conversion program.
Gibbs, H; Grace, K; Hyatt, R; Jones, DL; Lowenthal, SP; Maneval, K; O'Malley, PG; Sheikh, M; Spain, J; Swiecki, J; Taylor, AJ; West, M, 2001
)
0.31
" The possibility of uncommon but potentially serious adverse effects suggests that these programs require appropriate monitoring."( Lipid-lowering efficacy, safety, and costs of a large-scale therapeutic statin formulary conversion program.
Gibbs, H; Grace, K; Hyatt, R; Jones, DL; Lowenthal, SP; Maneval, K; O'Malley, PG; Sheikh, M; Spain, J; Swiecki, J; Taylor, AJ; West, M, 2001
)
0.31
" The incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse experiences were not increased in the simvastatin-treated patients compared with placebo."( Safety and efficacy of simvastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients undergoing chronic renal dialysis.
Morgan, C; Rigby, RJ; Saltissi, D; Westhuyzen, J, 2002
)
0.85
" Ezetimibe was safe and well tolerated."( Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with atorvastatin or simvastatin in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.
Bruckert, E; Gagné, C; Gaudet, D, 2002
)
0.55
" No significant adverse effects were noted, and no complications with drug withdrawals occurred."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of pravastatin and simvastatin in heart transplantation.
DeGruiter, H; Lavie, CJ; Mehra, MR; Milani, RV; Uber, PA; Vivekananthan, K, 2002
)
0.56
"Simvastatin and pravastatin are safe and very effective in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol lowering in heart transplant recipients, with simvastatin being more efficacious than pravastatin in lipid lowering in this group of patients."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of pravastatin and simvastatin in heart transplantation.
DeGruiter, H; Lavie, CJ; Mehra, MR; Milani, RV; Uber, PA; Vivekananthan, K, 2002
)
2
" Data obtained by monitoring lipid profiles, adverse events, and laboratory tests during the 16 weeks of study were used to assess the efficacy and safety of both treatments."( Comparing the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin and simvastatin in Asians with elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol--a multinational, multicenter, double-blind study.
Hin, AT; Lee, YT; Suyono, S; Sy, R; Tanphaichitr, V; Wu, CC, 2002
)
0.56
" No deaths occurred in the study population and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was the same in the two groups (28%)."( Comparing the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin and simvastatin in Asians with elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol--a multinational, multicenter, double-blind study.
Hin, AT; Lee, YT; Suyono, S; Sy, R; Tanphaichitr, V; Wu, CC, 2002
)
0.56
" There was no evidence of any adverse effect of simvastatin on growth and pubertal development."( Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with simvastatin.
Bakker, HD; de Jongh, S; Dobbelaere, D; Gagné, C; Gumbiner, B; Kastelein, JJ; Lambert, M; Mercuri, M; Ose, L; Perron, P; Saborio, M; Sapre, A; Scott, R; Stepanavage, M; Szamosi, T; Tuohy, MB; van Trotsenburg, AS, 2002
)
0.77
" Interest lies in estimating relevant doses among those under investigation for efficacy and safety variables, such as the minimum effective dose or the maximum safe dose (or estimating both doses simultaneously)."( Identifying effective and/or safe doses by stepwise confidence intervals for ratios.
Bretz, F; Hothorn, LA; Hsu, JC, 2003
)
0.32
" Data included medication use, clinic visits, adverse events, LDL-C and other laboratory measures."( An economic analysis of the Atorvastatin Comparative Cholesterol Efficacy and Safety Study (ACCESS).
McBurney, CR; Smith, DG, 2003
)
0.32
" In all five studies, most adverse events were related to hypoglycemia, as expected in a normal population given a blood glucose regulator."( Influence of drugs interacting with CYP3A4 on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the prandial glucose regulator repaglinide.
Hansen, KT; Hatorp, V; Thomsen, MS, 2003
)
0.32
"To investigate whether patients, who are at risk of major acute coronary events, are safe to undergo and benefit from early intervention after using simvastatin."( Lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of varying doses of Simvastatin in patients with early stage acute coronary syndromes: one-year follow-up study.
Cui, L; Gao, M; Hu, D; Liu, X; Wei, Y; Xu, Z; Yang, X; Zou, Y, 2003
)
0.77
" Lipid levels were measured immediately, followed by the 3rd, 6th and 12th month after admission and all adverse events were recorded during follow-up."( Lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of varying doses of Simvastatin in patients with early stage acute coronary syndromes: one-year follow-up study.
Cui, L; Gao, M; Hu, D; Liu, X; Wei, Y; Xu, Z; Yang, X; Zou, Y, 2003
)
0.57
"A generic preparation of simvastatin Vasilip in a 12-week open noncomparative study demonstrated substantial lipid lowering activity and did not induce serious adverse reactions."( [Efficacy and safety of simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia (results of a Multicenter Clinical Study)].
Bubnova, MG; Katel'nitskaia, LI; Kukharchuk, VV; Nikitin, IuP; Ol'binskaia, LI, 2003
)
0.93
" How safe and well-tolerated is this combination? One hundred sixty patients with CAD, including 25 with diabetes mellitus, with mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of 128 mg/dl, HDL cholesterol of < or =35 mg/dl (mean 31), and mean triglycerides of 217 mg/dl were randomized to 4 factorial combinations of antioxidant vitamins or their placebos and simvastatin plus niacin or their placebos."( Safety and tolerability of simvastatin plus niacin in patients with coronary artery disease and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (The HDL Atherosclerosis Treatment Study).
Albers, JJ; Brown, BG; Chait, A; DeAngelis, D; Dowdy, AA; Frohlich, J; Heise, N; Morse, JS; Zhao, XQ, 2004
)
0.79
"The estimated likelihood of the side effect occurring."( Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines.
Berry, DC; Knapp, P; Raynor, DK, 2004
)
0.32
"The mean likelihood estimate given for the constipation side effect was 34."( Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines.
Berry, DC; Knapp, P; Raynor, DK, 2004
)
0.32
" The use of verbal descriptors to improve the level of information about side effect risk leads to overestimation of the level of harm and may lead patients to make inappropriate decisions about whether or not they take the medicine."( Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines.
Berry, DC; Knapp, P; Raynor, DK, 2004
)
0.32
" Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring adverse experiences and safety laboratory tests."( Efficacy and safety of simvastatin in Asian and non-Asian coronary heart disease patients: a comparison of the GOALLS and STATT studies.
Bilheimer, D; Chung, N; Davies, MJ; Lee, K; Loeys, T; Morales, D; Sangwatanaroj, S; Shah, A; Yin, WH; Zhu, JR, 2004
)
0.63
" There were no clinically meaningful differences between the EZE and PBO groups with regard to the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (19% vs 17%, respectively), discontinuations due to AEs (7% vs 10%), serious AEs (12% vs 17%), consecutive elevations in liver function tests > or =3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) (0."( Long-term safety and, tolerability profiles and lipid-modifying efficacy of ezetimibe coadministered with ongoing simvastatin treatment: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 48-week extension study.
Cho, M; Gagné, C; Gumbiner, B; Johnson-Levonas, AO; Masana, L; Mata, P; Meehan, A; Sirah, W; Troxell, JK, 2005
)
0.54
"The authors reviewed adverse events (AEs) reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration to determine the percentage of statin-associated AE reports with concurrent amiodarone use for simvastatin, atorvastatin, and pravastatin."( Adverse events with concomitant amiodarone and statin therapy.
Alsheikh-Ali, AA; Karas, RH, 2005
)
0.52
" Lipid profiles, physical and laboratory investigations for adverse effects were assessed."( [Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with simvastatin and fenofibrate for combined hyperlipidemia].
Chen, H; Luo, Y; Ren, JY, 2005
)
0.58
" (3) All treatments were well tolerated with no increase in adverse events for combination therapy versus monotherapy."( [Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with simvastatin and fenofibrate for combined hyperlipidemia].
Chen, H; Luo, Y; Ren, JY, 2005
)
0.58
"The results of this study demonstrated that combination therapy with fenofibrate (200 mg/day) and low-dose simvastatin (10 mg/day) is more effective than monotherapy in patients with combined hyperlipidemia, and is generally safe and well tolerated."( [Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with simvastatin and fenofibrate for combined hyperlipidemia].
Chen, H; Luo, Y; Ren, JY, 2005
)
0.8
" The clinical benefits of preventing vascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, and need for revascularization outweigh the low rates of adverse events associated with high-dose statin therapy in high- and intermediate-risk patients."( Safety of high-dose atorvastatin therapy.
Waters, DD, 2005
)
0.33
" At least 1 clinical adverse event and at least 1 adverse drug reaction were observed in 25."( A randomized, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin compared with simvastatin in Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Cho, SY; Chung, N; Ha, JW; Kang, HJ; Oh, BH; Park, S; Rim, SJ, 2005
)
0.55
" Seventeen subjects who had adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to simvastatin (ADR group) could not complete the 6-month follow-up and were included in the association analyses for safety."( The role of common variants of ABCB1, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 genes in lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of simvastatin treatment.
da Silveira, FR; Ferreira, ME; Fiegenbaum, M; Hutz, MH; Pires, RC; Van der Sand, CR; Van der Sand, LC, 2005
)
0.78
"Myopathy and rhabdomyolysis are rare adverse effects of treatment with hydroxymethylglutaryl-coA reductase inhibitors."( [Rhabdomyolysis as a side effect of simvastatin treatment].
Iskra, B; Kes, P; Zivko, M, 2005
)
0.6
"Despite the excellent benefit/risk profile of statins, their use is limited by a dose-related risk of adverse events, particularly those related to muscle toxicity."( Striated muscle safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin (Vytorin).
Davidson, MH; Maccubbin, D; Musliner, T; Stepanavage, M; Strony, J, 2006
)
0.61
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
" There were no serious adverse events caused by study treatment."( The second United Kingdom Heart and Renal Protection (UK-HARP-II) Study: a randomized controlled study of the biochemical safety and efficacy of adding ezetimibe to simvastatin as initial therapy among patients with CKD.
Adu, D; Altmann, P; Armitage, J; Baigent, C; Ball, S; Baxter, A; Blackwell, L; Cairns, HS; Carr, S; Collins, R; Kourellias, K; Landray, M; Leaper, C; Rogerson, M; Scoble, JE; Tomson, CR; Warwick, G; Wheeler, DC, 2006
)
0.53
" Tolerability was assessed by adverse event reports and laboratory and vital signs assessments throughout the study."( Comparison of the lipid-modifying efficacy and safety profiles of ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin in older versus younger patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a post Hoc analysis of subpopulations from three pooled clinical trials.
Davidson, M; Feldman, T; Maccubbin, D; Meehan, A; Mitchel, Y; Shah, A; Tribble, D; Veltri, E; Zakson, M, 2006
)
0.55
" Clinical chemistry profiles and proportions of adverse events were similar in both groups at baseline and follow-up."( Efficacy, safety and LDL-C goal attainment of ezetimibe 10 mg-simvastatin 20 mg vs. placebo-simvastatin 20 mg in UK-based adults with coronary heart disease and hypercholesterolaemia.
Hughes, EA; Patel, JV, 2006
)
0.57
" However, clinical data consistently support the view that adverse events are uncommon even when intensive therapy is used to reach aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals."( How safe is aggressive statin therapy?
Guthrie, RM, 2006
)
0.33
" Pravastatin was not toxic up to 1 mmol/l."( Toxicity of statins on rat skeletal muscle mitochondria.
Brecht, K; Kaufmann, P; Krähenbühl, S; Török, M; Waldhauser, KM; Zahno, A, 2006
)
0.33
" Current drug labeling warns of an increased risk of adverse events with statin and niacin combinations."( Safety of lovastatin/extended release niacin compared with lovastatin alone, atorvastatin alone, pravastatin alone, and simvastatin alone (from the United States Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system).
Alsheikh-Ali, AA; Karas, RH, 2007
)
0.55
" 100 patients received 20-40 mg Zo-20 during the 3 months period, all parameters of the blood plasma lipids and adverse events were monitored during the study."( [Clinical efficacy and safety of Zo-20 in patients with ischemic heart disease].
Mamatsashvili, M; Mdivani, I, 2008
)
0.35
" Niacin's major adverse experience (AE) is flushing."( Safety of niacin and simvastatin combination therapy.
Bays, H, 2008
)
0.66
"001) because of clinical adverse experiences (primarily flushing)."( Lipid-altering efficacy and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin coadministered with extended-release niacin in patients with type IIa or type IIb hyperlipidemia.
Brown, BG; Fazio, S; Guyton, JR; Polis, A; Tershakovec, AM; Tomassini, JE, 2008
)
0.6
" A total of 20% of patients discontinued treatment because of a treatment-related adverse event, including 7% who discontinued because of flushing."( Long-term safety and efficacy of a combination of niacin extended release and simvastatin in patients with dyslipidemia: the OCEANS study.
Bajorunas, DR; Davidson, MH; Karas, RH; Kashyap, ML; Keller, LH; Knopp, RH, 2008
)
0.57
"Treatment with NER/S 2,000/40 mg/day is well tolerated, has no unanticipated adverse events, and provides additional, clinically relevant improvements in multiple lipid parameters beyond statin monotherapy."( Long-term safety and efficacy of a combination of niacin extended release and simvastatin in patients with dyslipidemia: the OCEANS study.
Bajorunas, DR; Davidson, MH; Karas, RH; Kashyap, ML; Keller, LH; Knopp, RH, 2008
)
0.57
" Our results suggest that artemisinin, a widely used antimalarial drug, may impair the response to doxorubicin in colon cancer cells; on the contrary, simvastatin and RhoA siRNA may represent future therapeutic approaches to improve doxorubicin efficacy, reducing the risk of doxorubicin-dependent adverse effects."( Activation of nuclear factor-kappa B pathway by simvastatin and RhoA silencing increases doxorubicin cytotoxicity in human colon cancer HT29 cells.
Aldieri, E; Bosia, A; Costamagna, C; Doublier, S; Ghigo, D; Pescarmona, G; Riganti, C, 2008
)
0.8
" In conclusion, this study showed that NER/S provided additional clinically relevant improvements in multiple lipid parameters and was safe and well tolerated."( Comparison of the safety and efficacy of a combination tablet of niacin extended release and simvastatin vs simvastatin monotherapy in patients with increased non-HDL cholesterol (from the SEACOAST I study).
Bajorunas, DR; Ballantyne, CM; Davidson, MH; Karas, RH; Keller, LH; McKenney, J, 2008
)
0.57
" These effects were seen without any documented adverse drug reactions or changes in viral and immunologic control."( Safety and efficacy of simvastatin for the treatment of dyslipidemia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving efavirenz-based highly active antiretroviral therapy.
Bain, AM; Bedimo, R; Busti, AJ; Eaton, SA; Nguyen, ST; Payne, KD; Rahman, AP, 2008
)
0.66
" Incidence of adverse drug reactions during the 4-year extension period was lower than previously."( Relationship between coronary events and serum cholesterol during 10 years of low-dose simvastatin therapy: long-term efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia in the Japan Lipid Intervention Trial (J-LIT) Extension 10 Study, a pr
Itakura, H; Kita, T; Mabuchi, H; Matsuzaki, M; Matsuzawa, Y; Nakaya, N; Oikawa, S; Saito, Y; Sasaki, J; Shimamoto, K, 2008
)
0.57
"Long-term, low-dose simvastatin therapy was safe and effective in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia."( Relationship between coronary events and serum cholesterol during 10 years of low-dose simvastatin therapy: long-term efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia in the Japan Lipid Intervention Trial (J-LIT) Extension 10 Study, a pr
Itakura, H; Kita, T; Mabuchi, H; Matsuzaki, M; Matsuzawa, Y; Nakaya, N; Oikawa, S; Saito, Y; Sasaki, J; Shimamoto, K, 2008
)
0.89
" During the extension study, investigators assessed adverse events (AEs)."( Long-term (48-week) safety of ezetimibe 10 mg/day coadministered with simvastatin compared to simvastatin alone in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.
Bays, H; Capece, R; Liu, J; Sapre, A; Taggart, W; Tershakovec, A, 2008
)
0.58
" Safety and tolerability were assessed through clinical and laboratory adverse experiences (AEs)."( Long-term safety and tolerability of ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients: a randomized, 12-month double-blind extension study.
Hanson, ME; Strony, J; Veltri, EP; Yang, B, 2008
)
0.58
"3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are safe and well-tolerated therapeutic drugs."( Possible mechanisms underlying statin-induced skeletal muscle toxicity in L6 fibroblasts and in rats.
Ichihara, K; Itagaki, M; Kaneta, S; Kano, S; Satoh, K; Takaguri, A, 2009
)
0.35
" Rates of any reported serious adverse event were higher in older patients, but did not differ between the 2 statin groups."( Comparison of efficacy and safety of atorvastatin (80 mg) to simvastatin (20 to 40 mg) in patients aged <65 versus >or=65 years with coronary heart disease (from the Incremental DEcrease through Aggressive Lipid Lowering [IDEAL] study).
Cater, NB; Faergeman, O; Holme, I; Kastelein, JJ; Larsen, ML; Lindahl, C; Olsson, AG; Pedersen, TR; Szarek, M; Tikkanen, MJ, 2009
)
0.59
"Muscle and liver adverse effects of simvastatin 40 mg daily were evaluated in a randomized placebo-controlled trial involving 20,536 UK patients with vascular disease or diabetes (in which a substantial reduction of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity has previously been demonstrated)."( Effects of simvastatin 40 mg daily on muscle and liver adverse effects in a 5-year randomized placebo-controlled trial in 20,536 high-risk people.
Armitage, J; Bowman, L; Collins, R; Parish, S; Tobert, J, 2009
)
1.02
"These findings indicate that ezetimibe/simvastatin combination therapy is safe and effective in patients with type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease."( [Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease].
Abel, T; Dinya, E; Fehér, J; Gamal Eldin, M; Kovács, A, 2009
)
0.9
" The incidence of liver, muscle, and gastrointestinal-, hepatitis- and allergic reaction/rash-related adverse events were low and generally similar to those in previous studies of ezetimibe/simvastatin and/or atorvastatin."( Lipid-altering efficacy and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia and the metabolic syndrome (from the VYMET study).
Adewale, AJ; Ballantyne, CM; Grundy, SM; Hsueh, WA; Parving, HH; Polis, AB; Robinson, JG; Rosen, JB; Tershakovec, AM; Tomassini, JE, 2009
)
0.8
" The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of statin-associated adverse events in diabetic and non-diabetic patients affected by polygenic hypercholesterolemia or combined hyperlipidemia and the efficacy and tolerability of treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/10 mg/day on the same subjects experiencing the adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin association on non-diabetic and diabetic patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia or combined hyperlipidemia and previously intolerant to standard statin treatment.
Ciccarelli, L; Cicero, AF; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Franzetti, IG; Gadaleta, G; Piccinni, MN; Ragonesi, PD; Scalise, F, 2009
)
0.81
" Each Centre used any of the available statins on the basis of current clinical judgement and monitored enrolled patients for adverse events during the following 2 years."( Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin association on non-diabetic and diabetic patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia or combined hyperlipidemia and previously intolerant to standard statin treatment.
Ciccarelli, L; Cicero, AF; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Franzetti, IG; Gadaleta, G; Piccinni, MN; Ragonesi, PD; Scalise, F, 2009
)
0.63
" Patients affected by polygenic hypercholesterolemia experiencing adverse event under statin treatment obtained a significantly lower reduction than those tolerating the treatment (P < 0*001)."( Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin association on non-diabetic and diabetic patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia or combined hyperlipidemia and previously intolerant to standard statin treatment.
Ciccarelli, L; Cicero, AF; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Franzetti, IG; Gadaleta, G; Piccinni, MN; Ragonesi, PD; Scalise, F, 2009
)
0.63
"The efficacy and adverse effect profile of the ezetimibe and simvastatin combination appear to be good for both diabetic and nondiabetic patients, and in both conditions."( Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin association on non-diabetic and diabetic patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia or combined hyperlipidemia and previously intolerant to standard statin treatment.
Ciccarelli, L; Cicero, AF; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Franzetti, IG; Gadaleta, G; Piccinni, MN; Ragonesi, PD; Scalise, F, 2009
)
0.88
" Efficacy and safety were evaluated using lipid profiles, trough calcineurin inhibitor levels, allograft function, and adverse effects."( The efficacy and safety of ezetimibe and low-dose simvastatin as a primary treatment for dyslipidemia in renal transplant recipients.
Choi, BS; Hwang, HS; Hyoung, BJ; Jeon, YJ; Kim, YS; Lee, SY; Song, JC; Yang, CW; Yoon, HE, 2009
)
0.61
" No significant change in the trough calcineurin inhibitor levels or allograft function occurred, and no serious adverse effects were observed."( The efficacy and safety of ezetimibe and low-dose simvastatin as a primary treatment for dyslipidemia in renal transplant recipients.
Choi, BS; Hwang, HS; Hyoung, BJ; Jeon, YJ; Kim, YS; Lee, SY; Song, JC; Yang, CW; Yoon, HE, 2009
)
0.61
"Ezetimibe and low-dose statin treatment is safe and effective as a primary treatment for dyslipidemia in renal transplant patients."( The efficacy and safety of ezetimibe and low-dose simvastatin as a primary treatment for dyslipidemia in renal transplant recipients.
Choi, BS; Hwang, HS; Hyoung, BJ; Jeon, YJ; Kim, YS; Lee, SY; Song, JC; Yang, CW; Yoon, HE, 2009
)
0.61
" We defined a composite adverse event (CAE) as discontinuation for any side effect, myalgia, or CK >3x upper limit of normal during follow-up."( The SLCO1B1*5 genetic variant is associated with statin-induced side effects.
Ali, S; Ginsburg, GS; Reed, CR; Salisbury, BA; Shah, SH; Spasojevic, I; Voora, D, 2009
)
0.35
"These results showed that both the combined ezetimibe/simvastatin treatment and the simvastatin monotherapy proved to be effective and safe in patients with NAFLD and in cases of high cardiovascular risk."( Safety and efficacy of combined ezetimibe/simvastatin treatment and simvastatin monotherapy in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Abel, T; Dinya, E; Eldin, MG; Fehér, J; Kovács, A, 2009
)
0.87
"Mean percentage changes in lipid parameters, percentages of patients achieving optimal serum lipid/apolipoprotein levels, and incidence of adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of fenofibric acid co-administered with low- or moderate-dose statin in patients with mixed dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus: results of a pooled subgroup analysis from three randomized, controlled, double-blind trials.
Cusi, K; Davidson, MH; Jones, PH; Kelly, MT; Setze, CM; Sleep, DJ; Stolzenbach, JC; Thakker, K, 2010
)
0.36
" Incidence of adverse events was generally similar among treatments."( Efficacy and safety of fenofibric acid co-administered with low- or moderate-dose statin in patients with mixed dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus: results of a pooled subgroup analysis from three randomized, controlled, double-blind trials.
Cusi, K; Davidson, MH; Jones, PH; Kelly, MT; Setze, CM; Sleep, DJ; Stolzenbach, JC; Thakker, K, 2010
)
0.36
" The primary end point, the safety of E/S plus niacin, included prespecified adverse events (ie, liver, muscle, discontinuations due to flushing, gallbladder-related, cholecystectomy, fasting glucose changes, new-onset diabetes)."( Long-term safety and efficacy of triple combination ezetimibe/simvastatin plus extended-release niacin in patients with hyperlipidemia.
Adewale, AJ; Fazio, S; Guyton, JR; Polis, AB; Ryan, NW; Tershakovec, AM; Tomassini, JE, 2010
)
0.6
" Safety was evaluated based on data collected for adverse events (AEs), physical and electrocardiographic examinations, vital sign measurements, and clinical laboratory tests."( Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin and fenofibric acid combination therapy versus simvastatin monotherapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia: a randomized, double-blind study.
Carlson, DM; Gold, A; Jones, PH; Kelly, MT; McKenney, JM; Roth, EM; Setze, CM; Stolzenbach, JC; Williams, LA, 2010
)
0.59
" Our findings thereby reveal a safe and efficient therapeutic opportunity for the abrogation of late thoracic radiation injury, potentially usable either before or after radiation exposure; this approach is especially attractive in (1) the radiation oncology setting, as it does not interfere with prior anti-cancer treatment and in (2) radioprotection, as applicable to the treatment of established radiation injury, for example in the case of radiation accidents or acts of terrorism."( Modulation of the Rho/ROCK pathway in heart and lung after thorax irradiation reveals targets to improve normal tissue toxicity.
Monceau, V; Opolon, P; Pasinetti, N; Pouzoulet, F; Schupp, C; Vozenin, MC, 2010
)
0.36
" Simvastatin was more toxic than atorvastatin and the lactone form more toxic than the acid form."( Cytotoxicity of atorvastatin and simvastatin on primary rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hepatocytes.
Asberg, A; Ellesat, KS; Hylland, K; Thomas, KV; Tollefsen, KE, 2010
)
1.55
" The FDA reissued the warning in 2008 after receiving reports of 52 cases of rhabdomyolysis in the Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) after the label changes in 2002 and suggested use of an alternative statin for patients receiving amiodarone who require more than 20 mg simvastatin to attain lipid goals."( Results of a safety initiative for patients on concomitant amiodarone and simvastatin therapy in a Veterans Affairs medical center.
Beckey, C; Hough, A; Karimi, S; Parra, D, 2010
)
0.77
"Combination E/S+N is a safe treatment option for hyperlipidaemic patients including those with DM and MetS, but requires monitoring of glucose and potentially uric acid levels."( Long-term efficacy and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin coadministered with extended-release niacin in hyperlipidaemic patients with diabetes or metabolic syndrome.
Fazio, S; Guyton, JR; Lin, J; Shah, A; Tershakovec, AM; Tomassini, JE, 2010
)
0.62
" Incidences of adverse events or creatine kinase elevations were similar between groups."( Lipid-altering efficacy and safety profile of combination therapy with ezetimibe/statin vs. statin monotherapy in patients with and without diabetes: an analysis of pooled data from 27 clinical trials.
Betteridge, DJ; Brudi, P; Farnier, M; Guyton, JR; Johnson-Levonas, AO; Leiter, LA; Lin, J; Shah, A, 2011
)
0.37
" Our study enrolled 12 CAPD patients who were experiencing adverse effects from statin therapy."( Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe and low-dose simvastatin as primary treatment for dyslipidemia in peritoneal dialysis patients.
Inoue, T; Kikuta, T; Sato, T; Suzuki, H; Tsuda, M; Watanabe, Y, 2010
)
0.62
" Compared to conventional markers, such as AST, ALT, and CK, the urine metabolic profile provided clearer distinction between the pre- and post-treatment groups treated with toxic levels of simvastatin."( An effective assessment of simvastatin-induced toxicity with NMR-based metabonomics approach.
Choi, MJ; Hong, SS; Hong, SW; Jung, KH; Kim, JM; Kwon, HN; Park, S; Wen, H; Yang, HJ, 2011
)
0.86
" However, the side effect of flushing can challenge patient adherence to treatment."( Niacin extended-release therapy in phase III clinical trials is associated with relatively low rates of drug discontinuation due to flushing and treatment-related adverse events: a pooled analysis.
Brinton, EA; Jiang, P; Kashyap, ML; Padley, RJ; Thakkar, RB; Vo, AN, 2011
)
0.37
"Data were pooled from eight NER studies (administered as NER with a maximum dosage of 1000, 1500, and 2000 mg/day, either as monotherapy or in combination with simvastatin 20 or 40 mg/day [NER/S], or lovastatin 20 or 40 mg/day [NER/L]) to evaluate rates of study discontinuation due to flushing or any treatment-related adverse events."( Niacin extended-release therapy in phase III clinical trials is associated with relatively low rates of drug discontinuation due to flushing and treatment-related adverse events: a pooled analysis.
Brinton, EA; Jiang, P; Kashyap, ML; Padley, RJ; Thakkar, RB; Vo, AN, 2011
)
0.57
" Of the total number of patients treated with NER (n = 307), NER/S (n = 912), or NER/L (n = 928), 34 (11%), 105 (11%), and 127 (14%) patients discontinued due to any treatment-related adverse event, respectively, while 14 (5%), 43 (5%), and 55 (6%) discontinued due to flushing."( Niacin extended-release therapy in phase III clinical trials is associated with relatively low rates of drug discontinuation due to flushing and treatment-related adverse events: a pooled analysis.
Brinton, EA; Jiang, P; Kashyap, ML; Padley, RJ; Thakkar, RB; Vo, AN, 2011
)
0.37
" SB-649868 was well tolerated at all doses in this study population, with mechanism-related adverse events (e."( Phase I studies on the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of SB-649868, a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist.
Alexander, R; Bettica, P; Gomeni, R; Nucci, G; Pyke, C; Ratti, E; Squassante, L; Zamuner, S, 2012
)
0.38
" We compared isolated primary mouse skeletal muscle myocytes, C2C12 myotubes and liver HepG2 cells to detect differences that could uncover why statins are toxic in skeletal muscle but less so in the liver."( Susceptibility to simvastatin-induced toxicity is partly determined by mitochondrial respiration and phosphorylation state of Akt.
Brecht, K; Felser, A; Krähenbühl, S; Lindinger, P; Maseneni, S; Mullen, PJ; Zahno, A, 2011
)
0.7
" Both monotherapy and combination therapy groups had similar incidences of all types of adverse events."( Retrospective study on antihyperlipidemic efficacy and safety of simvastatin, ezetimibe and their combination in Korean adults.
Bae, JW; Choi, CI; Jang, CG; Kim, MJ; Lee, SY; Lee, YH, 2011
)
0.61
" Adverse experiences (AEs) typically associated with niacin (flushing, pruritus, increased glucose, increased uric acid) were more common with ERN/LRPT+SIMVA, and hepatic-related laboratory AEs were more common with ATORVA."( Lipid-altering efficacy and safety profile of co-administered extended release niacin/laropiprant and simvastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.
Blomqvist, P; Chen, E; Chen, F; Davidson, M; Maccubbin, D; McKenney, JM; Sirah, W; Sisk, CM; Yan, L, 2013
)
0.61
" These adverse events (AEs) can have serious impact, and form a significant barrier to therapy adherence."( A survey of the FDA's AERS database regarding muscle and tendon adverse events linked to the statin drug class.
Dimbil, M; Golomb, BA; Hoffman, KB; Kraus, C, 2012
)
0.38
" Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events, laboratory assays, vital signs, physical examinations and 12-lead electrocardiograms."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin combination tablet: an open-label, single-dose study in healthy Chinese subjects.
Chen, WL; Chu, NN; Li, XN; Xu, HR, 2012
)
0.64
"Hepatocytes are used widely as a cell model for investigation of xenobiotic metabolism and the toxic mechanism of drugs."( Integrative analysis of proteomic and transcriptomic data for identification of pathways related to simvastatin-induced hepatotoxicity.
Baek, MC; Cho, YE; Kang, W; Kim, SH; Lee, HC; Lee, JE; Lee, MH; Moon, PG; Singh, TS, 2013
)
0.61
" Hepatotoxicity is one of the serious adverse effects of statins, and the exact mechanism of hepatotoxicity is not yet clear."( Mechanisms of the statins cytotoxicity in freshly isolated rat hepatocytes.
Abdoli, N; Azarmi, Y; Eghbal, MA; Heidari, R, 2013
)
0.39
" No serious adverse event was observed in either group."( Efficacy and safety of morning versus evening dose of controlled-release simvastatin tablets in patients with hyperlipidemia: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase III trial.
Cho, SW; Han, KR; Hoon Park, S; Hyun, MS; Kim, MK; Kim, SH; Kim, YK; Seo, HS, 2013
)
0.62
" Their most frequent side effect is myotoxicity."( Structural and functional characterization of simvastatin-induced myotoxicity in different skeletal muscles.
Bal, IB; Onur, R; Sara, Y; Severcan, F; Simsek Ozek, N, 2014
)
0.66
" Polypharmacy is a known risk factor for toxic myopathies; our data suggest that some medication combinations may simultaneously activate upstream autophagy signaling pathways while inhibiting the degradation of these newly synthesized autophagosomes, resulting in myotoxicity."( Increased autophagy accelerates colchicine-induced muscle toxicity.
Ching, JK; Ju, JS; Margeta, M; Pittman, SK; Weihl, CC, 2013
)
0.39
"The NR1I3 rs2307424 genotype distribution was different between subjects with and without adverse drug reactions."( Influence of PPARA, RXRA, NR1I2 and NR1I3 gene polymorphisms on the lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of statin therapy.
Almeida, S; Bruxel, EM; Ferreira, ME; Fiegenbaum, M; Hutz, MH; Lima, LO; Pires, RC; Van der Sand, CR; Van der Sand, LC, 2013
)
0.39
"Statins are potent cholesterol-lowering drugs that can have serious adverse effects on the muscles and liver."( Efficiency of hepatocyte pretreatment with coenzyme Q10 against statin toxicity.
Abdoli, N; Azarmi, Y; Eghbal, MA, 2014
)
0.4
" After 8 weeks, the treatment outcomes and adverse effects of the 2 treatments were compared."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety profile of morning administration of controlled-release simvastatin versus evening administration of immediate-release simvastatin in chronic kidney disease patients with dyslipidemia.
Chung, W; Han, KH; Hwang, YH; Jo, SK; Kim, HJ; Kim, SG; Lee, CH; Oh, KH; Song, YR; Yi, YJ, 2014
)
0.62
" Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are presented as risk ratio (RR)."( Efficacy and safety of pitavastatin versus simvastatin: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Fang, DZ; Gong, RR; Hu, MS; Jiang, Z; Lin, J; Liu, XJ; Qiu, L; Su, M; Wang, Q, 2014
)
0.67
" The statins are among the most commonly prescribed drugs in medicine but have also adverse side effects and come into interactions with other drugs."( Preliminary studies evaluating cytotoxic effect of combined treatment with methotrexate and simvastatin on green monkey kidney cells.
Izdebska, M; Jagiełło-Wójtowicz, E; Natorska-Chomicka, D,
)
0.35
" However, a recognized side-effect of statin therapy is myopathy, which in severe cases can present as potentially fatal rhabdomyolysis."( Inhibition of prenyltransferase activity by statins in both liver and muscle cell lines is not causative of cytotoxicity.
Gee, RH; Johnston, JD; Malia, JM; Plant, KE; Plant, NJ; Spinks, JN, 2015
)
0.42
" Simvastatin was the most toxic tested compound for zebrafish embryo, followed by diclofenac."( Toxicity screening of diclofenac, propranolol, sertraline and simvastatin using Danio rerio and Paracentrotus lividus embryo bioassays.
Martins, R; Ribeiro, S; Santos, MM; Torres, T, 2015
)
1.57
" They are generally well-tolerated, but myopathy is a potentially severe adverse reaction of these compounds."( The AKT/mTOR signaling pathway plays a key role in statin-induced myotoxicity.
Bonifacio, A; Bouitbir, J; Krähenbühl, S; Sanvee, GM, 2015
)
0.42
" Two authors independently selected trials fulfilling these criteria: RCTs comparing Ezetimibe±statin or another lipid-lowering drug against placebo, or against the same lipid-lowering drug at the same dosage, with a follow-up at least 24 weeks and one or more of these outcomes: all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), cancer, serious adverse events (SAEs); we assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane checklist."( Clinical efficacy and safety of Ezetimibe on major cardiovascular endpoints: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Battaggia, A; Donzelli, A; Font, M; Galvano, A; Molteni, D, 2015
)
0.42
"Current evidence regarding the adverse effects of fenofibrate/simvastatin combination is critically presented based on the results of large randomized controlled trials and other relevant studies."( Safety considerations with fenofibrate/simvastatin combination.
Elisaf, MS; Filippatos, TD, 2015
)
0.93
"Large randomized clinical trials show that the combined administration of fenofibrate with simvastatin is not associated with significantly increased incidence of serious adverse events compared with simvastatin monotherapy."( Safety considerations with fenofibrate/simvastatin combination.
Elisaf, MS; Filippatos, TD, 2015
)
0.91
" Cellular and molecular mechanisms of this adverse effect have been elusive, in particular because of the lack of in vitro models suitable for long-term exposures."( Cytostatic Effect of Repeated Exposure to Simvastatin: A Mechanism for Chronic Myotoxicity Revealed by the Use of Mesodermal Progenitors Derived from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Barragan, I; Battini, JL; Cousin, C; Egesipe, AL; Giraud-Triboult, K; Ingelman-Sundberg, M; Laustriat, D; Lotteau, V; Meyniel-Schicklin, L; Peric, D; Peschanski, M; Petit, V; Pinset, C; Sitbon, M; Touhami, J, 2015
)
0.68
" Hepatotoxicity is a rare but serious adverse effect of statins; however, its mechanisms are not clear."( MicroRNAs as biomarkers of hepatotoxicity in a randomized placebo-controlled study of simvastatin and ubiquinol supplementation.
Lim, SC; Lin, L; Ong, CN; Pek, SL; Sum, CF; Tavintharan, S; Woon, K, 2016
)
0.66
"Epidemiological studies have shown a positive correlation between environmental particulate matter and adverse health effects."( Particulate matter cytotoxicity in cultured SH-SY5Y cells is modulated by simvastatin: Toxicological assessment for oxidative damage.
Astort, F; Ferraro, SA; Tasat, DR; Yakisich, JS, 2016
)
0.67
" Statin therapy significantly lowers plasma TC and LDL levels in HIV-positive patients and is associated with low rates of adverse events."( Comparative safety and efficacy of statins for primary prevention in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ballocca, F; Barbero, U; Biondi-Zoccai, G; Bonora, S; Calcagno, A; Cannillo, M; Cerrato, E; D'Ascenzo, F; DiNicolantonio, JJ; Gaita, F; Gasparini, M; Gili, S; Grosso Marra, W; Lavie, CJ; Lonni, E; Mancone, M; Montefusco, A; Moretti, C; Omedè, P; Pianelli, M, 2016
)
0.43
"Ezetimibe and simvastatin treatment, either as a single pill or the combined use of the individual compounds, offers limited additional risk compared with simvastatin monotherapy and comprises a safe and efficient choice for dyslipidemia treatment in high-risk and diabetic patients."( The safety of ezetimibe and simvastatin combination for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia.
Elisaf, MS; Filippatos, TD; Kei, AA, 2016
)
1.09
" We aimed to quantify co-administration of MQAB with interacting drugs and associated adverse drug reactions."( Drug safety of macrolide and quinolone antibiotics in a tertiary care hospital: administration of interacting co-medication and QT prolongation.
Corti, N; Hoppe, L; Kovari, H; Maechler, S; Niedrig, D; Russmann, S, 2016
)
0.43
" Electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring and associated adverse events were validated in medical records."( Drug safety of macrolide and quinolone antibiotics in a tertiary care hospital: administration of interacting co-medication and QT prolongation.
Corti, N; Hoppe, L; Kovari, H; Maechler, S; Niedrig, D; Russmann, S, 2016
)
0.43
" Forty-four MQAB users had contraindicated co-administrations of simvastatin, atorvastatin, or tizanidine and three of those related adverse drug reactions."( Drug safety of macrolide and quinolone antibiotics in a tertiary care hospital: administration of interacting co-medication and QT prolongation.
Corti, N; Hoppe, L; Kovari, H; Maechler, S; Niedrig, D; Russmann, S, 2016
)
0.67
" However, adverse drug reactions were rarely found, and costs vs."( Drug safety of macrolide and quinolone antibiotics in a tertiary care hospital: administration of interacting co-medication and QT prolongation.
Corti, N; Hoppe, L; Kovari, H; Maechler, S; Niedrig, D; Russmann, S, 2016
)
0.43
"SIM/SIM-mPEG micelles were found to be an effective and safe treatment for closed femoral fracture repair in mice."( The Evaluation of Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety Profile of Simvastatin Prodrug Micelles in a Closed Fracture Mouse Model.
Daluiski, A; Dusad, A; Fehringer, EV; Goldring, SR; Jia, Z; Purdue, PE; Ren, K; Wang, D; Wei, X; Yuan, H; Zhang, Y, 2016
)
0.68
"Many adverse drug reactions are caused by the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent activation of drugs into reactive metabolites."( Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
Jones, LH; Nadanaciva, S; Rana, P; Will, Y, 2016
)
0.43
" In addition, it discusses how claims that statins commonly cause adverse effects reflect a failure to recognise the limitations of other sources of evidence about the effects of treatment."( Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy.
Armitage, J; Baigent, C; Blackwell, L; Blumenthal, R; Collins, R; Danesh, J; DeMets, D; Emberson, J; Evans, S; Law, M; MacMahon, S; Martin, S; Neal, B; Peto, R; Poulter, N; Preiss, D; Reith, C; Ridker, P; Roberts, I; Rodgers, A; Sandercock, P; Schulz, K; Sever, P; Simes, J; Smeeth, L; Smith, GD; Wald, N; Yusuf, S, 2016
)
0.43
" Adverse drug effects may be responsible for a fraction of nocturnal leg cramps but often go unrecognized, resulting in additional prescribing intended to deal with adverse effects that might be better addressed by reduction, substitution, or discontinuation of the offending agent."( Quinine induced simvastatin toxicity through cytochrome inhibition - a case report.
Just, JM; Just, KS; Weckbecker, K, 2016
)
0.78
" Safety end points were hemorrhagic transformation, hemorrhagic events, death, infections, and serious adverse events."( Combination of Thrombolysis and Statins in Acute Stroke Is Safe: Results of the STARS Randomized Trial (Stroke Treatment With Acute Reperfusion and Simvastatin).
Bravo, Y; Bustamante, A; Cánovas, D; Corbeto, N; de Arce, A; de la Torre, J; Delgado, P; Delgado-Mederos, R; Freijo, M; García-Matas, S; Giralt, D; Jiménez, C; Lago, A; Martínez-Zabaleta, M; Masjuán, J; Moniche, F; Montaner, J; Ribó, M; Rubio, FR; Segura, T; Tejada, J; Vives-Pastor, B, 2016
)
0.63
"Simvastatin plus tissue-type plasminogen activator combination seems safe in acute stroke, with low rates of bleeding complications."( Combination of Thrombolysis and Statins in Acute Stroke Is Safe: Results of the STARS Randomized Trial (Stroke Treatment With Acute Reperfusion and Simvastatin).
Bravo, Y; Bustamante, A; Cánovas, D; Corbeto, N; de Arce, A; de la Torre, J; Delgado, P; Delgado-Mederos, R; Freijo, M; García-Matas, S; Giralt, D; Jiménez, C; Lago, A; Martínez-Zabaleta, M; Masjuán, J; Moniche, F; Montaner, J; Ribó, M; Rubio, FR; Segura, T; Tejada, J; Vives-Pastor, B, 2016
)
2.08
" Safety outcomes were evaluated by the risk of adverse events (AE)."( Efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with statins for coronary heart disease: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Bai, Y; Chan, C; Chang, X; Cheng, N; Cheng, Z; Lu, Y; Zhao, Y, 2016
)
0.43
"Statins are generally well tolerated and adverse effects are relatively rare."( Hepatotoxicity of statins and other lipid-lowering agents.
Björnsson, ES, 2017
)
0.46
"9 million clinical reports submitted to FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2004 to 2015."( Effect of statins on blood pressure: Analysis on adverse events released by FDA.
Ding, F; Hou, XD; Liu, XG; Wang, XK; Xie, HH; Xie, XD; Yi, K; You, T; Zhang, P, 2017
)
0.46
"To our knowledge, this is the first pooled analysis on large-scale data of adverse events to identify the BP-lowering effect of statins."( Effect of statins on blood pressure: Analysis on adverse events released by FDA.
Ding, F; Hou, XD; Liu, XG; Wang, XK; Xie, HH; Xie, XD; Yi, K; You, T; Zhang, P, 2017
)
0.46
" This study supports the safe use of transdermal compositions that improve on the poor bioavailability of oral berberine and have the potential to be more efficacious in the treatment of dyslipidemia or hypercholesterolemia."( Comparative pharmacokinetics and safety assessment of transdermal berberine and dihydroberberine.
Azike, CG; Baranowski, DC; Buchanan, B; Gabriele, J; Meng, Q; Poulin, MM; Zuccolo, J, 2018
)
0.48
"To evaluate the onset timing of musculoskeletal adverse events (MAEs) that develop during statin monotherapy and to determine whether concomitant drugs used concurrently with statin therapy shifts the onset timing of MAEs."( Onset timing of statin-induced musculoskeletal adverse events and concomitant drug-associated shift in onset timing of MAEs.
Akimoto, H; Inoue, N; Kobayashi, D; Negishi, A; Numajiri, S; Ohshima, S; Okita, M; Oshima, S, 2018
)
0.48
" The present study showed strong cytotoxic potential for the NPS 5F-PB-22 and MDAI, moderate effects for MDMA, MDPV, methylone, cathinone, 4-MEC, and mephedrone, and no toxic effects for methamphetamine."( Cytotoxicity of new psychoactive substances and other drugs of abuse studied in human HepG2 cells using an adopted high content screening assay.
Beck, A; Flockerzi, V; Maurer, HH; Meyer, MR; Richter, LHJ, 2019
)
0.51
" Therefore, in T1DM, the deficiency of C-peptide may contribute to myopathy by rendering myoblast-like progenitor cells (involved in muscle regeneration) more susceptible to the toxic effects of insults such as simvastatin."( Proinsulin C-Peptide Enhances Cell Survival and Protects against Simvastatin-Induced Myotoxicity in L6 Rat Myoblasts.
Bevington, A; Brunskill, NJ; Essid, SM, 2019
)
0.94
" Co-administration of MNK and SMV decreased their toxic potentials on the liver, skeletal muscles, and kidney."( Montelukast modifies simvastatin-induced myopathy and hepatotoxicity.
Ahmed, EA; Ali, MF; Hareedy, MS, 2019
)
0.83
" The number of patients who stopped treatment because of adverse events was significantly higher in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin group (nine [56%] of 16 patients) compared with the other two groups (two [14%] of 14 for both groups; p=0·017)."( Safety of two different doses of simvastatin plus rifaximin in decompensated cirrhosis (LIVERHOPE-SAFETY): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.
Abraldes, JG; Alessandria, C; Amin, A; Andrade, RJ; Angeli, P; Bernardi, M; Beuers, U; Campion, D; Caraceni, P; Carol, M; de Wit, K; Domenech, G; Durand, F; Ferrero, J; Ginès, P; Jimenez, C; Kamath, PS; Llopis, M; Mookerjee, RP; Napoleone, L; Piano, S; Pich, J; Pose, E; Roux, O; Solà, E; Torres, F; Trebicka, J; Uschner, FE; Vargas, V; Zaccherini, G, 2020
)
1.05
"Treatment with simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin in patients with decompensated cirrhosis was associated with a significant increase in adverse events requiring treatment withdrawal, particularly rhabdomyolysis, compared with simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin."( Safety of two different doses of simvastatin plus rifaximin in decompensated cirrhosis (LIVERHOPE-SAFETY): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.
Abraldes, JG; Alessandria, C; Amin, A; Andrade, RJ; Angeli, P; Bernardi, M; Beuers, U; Campion, D; Caraceni, P; Carol, M; de Wit, K; Domenech, G; Durand, F; Ferrero, J; Ginès, P; Jimenez, C; Kamath, PS; Llopis, M; Mookerjee, RP; Napoleone, L; Piano, S; Pich, J; Pose, E; Roux, O; Solà, E; Torres, F; Trebicka, J; Uschner, FE; Vargas, V; Zaccherini, G, 2020
)
1.19
" Adverse events and changes in lipid panel profile, pulmonary function tests, and VEGF-D were assessed."( A phase II clinical trial of the Safety Of Simvastatin (SOS) in patients with pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis and with tuberous sclerosis complex.
Courtwright, AM; Dorgan, D; Fleck, V; Kotloff, R; Kreider, M; Krymskaya, VP; McCormack, FX, 2020
)
0.82
" The most common adverse events were peripheral edema (30%), cough (30%), and diarrhea (30%)."( A phase II clinical trial of the Safety Of Simvastatin (SOS) in patients with pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis and with tuberous sclerosis complex.
Courtwright, AM; Dorgan, D; Fleck, V; Kotloff, R; Kreider, M; Krymskaya, VP; McCormack, FX, 2020
)
0.82
"The combination of simvastatin with mTORi in LAM patients is safe and well-tolerated from an adverse events perspective."( A phase II clinical trial of the Safety Of Simvastatin (SOS) in patients with pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis and with tuberous sclerosis complex.
Courtwright, AM; Dorgan, D; Fleck, V; Kotloff, R; Kreider, M; Krymskaya, VP; McCormack, FX, 2020
)
1.15
" Myotoxicity of statins in certain individuals is often a severe side effect leading to withdrawal."( Resveratrol for protection against statin toxicity in C2C12 and H9c2 cells.
Attalah Nee Rezkallah, C; Chen, QM; Thongkum, A; Zhu, C, 2020
)
0.56
"Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN) is a common and dose-limiting adverse event."( P-Glycoprotein Inhibition Exacerbates Paclitaxel Neurotoxicity in Neurons and Patients With Cancer.
Hammer, HS; Khalaf, S; Kroetz, DL; Mortensen, C; Nielsen, F; Poetz, O; Rodriguez-Antona, C; Stage, TB; Steffensen, V; Svenningsen, ÅF; Xiong, C, 2020
)
0.56
" In terms of individual toxicity, omeprazole is the most toxic of the active ingredients, followed by simvastatin, diazepam and, finally, metformin."( Diazepam, metformin, omeprazole and simvastatin: a full discussion of individual and mixture acute toxicity.
d'Auriol, M; de Souza Santos, LV; Jacob, RS; Lange, LC; Lebron, YAR; Moreira, VR, 2020
)
1.05
" The study indicated that SLH formulations were safe and well-tolerated when administered to healthy males, confirming the commercial potential of SLH to enhance the bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs."( A safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic study of a novel simvastatin silica-lipid hybrid formulation in healthy male participants.
Abuhelwa, AY; Clifton, P; Joyce, P; Meola, TR; Prestidge, CA, 2021
)
0.86
"3%) showed adverse events, including gastrointestinal toxicity (36."( Safety of Chronic Simvastatin Treatment in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis: Many Adverse Events but No Liver Injury.
Álvarez, D; Cartier, M; Marino, M; Míguez, C; Muñoz, AE; Pollarsky, F; Romero, G; Salgado, P; Vázquez, H, 2021
)
0.96
"Chronic treatment with simvastatin 40 mg/day in patients with decompensated cirrhosis was associated with several adverse events, being MI the only clinically significant one, which appears to be related to the simvastatin dosage and the degree of cirrhosis severity."( Safety of Chronic Simvastatin Treatment in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis: Many Adverse Events but No Liver Injury.
Álvarez, D; Cartier, M; Marino, M; Míguez, C; Muñoz, AE; Pollarsky, F; Romero, G; Salgado, P; Vázquez, H, 2021
)
1.27
" In conclusion, myoblasts were more susceptible to the toxic effects of simvastatin and simvastatin impaired myoblast proliferation and myotube formation."( C2C12 myoblasts are more sensitive to the toxic effects of simvastatin than myotubes and show impaired proliferation and myotube formation.
Bouitbir, J; Krähenbühl, S; Sanvee, GM, 2021
)
1.1
"This study set out to optimize simvastatin (SV) in lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) to improve bioavailability, efficacy and alleviate adverse effects."( Therapeutic advancement of simvastatin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SV-SLNs) in treatment of hyperlipidemia and attenuating hepatotoxicity, myopathy and apoptosis: Comprehensive study.
Abdelsalam, RM; Abo-Zalam, HB; El-Denshary, ES; Hamzawy, MA; Khalil, IA; Khattab, MM, 2021
)
1.2
"There is a growing concern about the association between the combined use of daptomycin (DAP) and statins and the occurrence of musculoskeletal adverse events (MAEs), but this remains controversial."( Association Between Statin Use and Daptomycin-related Musculoskeletal Adverse Events: A Mixed Approach Combining a Meta-analysis and a Disproportionality Analysis.
Asada, M; Bando, T; Chuma, M; Goda, M; Hamano, H; Ishizawa, K; Izawa-Ishizawa, Y; Kondo, Y; Miyata, K; Nakamoto, A; Niimura, T; Okada, N; Takechi, K; Tasaki, Y; Yagi, K; Yanagawa, H; Yoshioka, T; Zamami, Y, 2022
)
0.72
" Second, we conducted a disproportionality analysis using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) to further confirm the results of the meta-analysis and to examine the effect of each type of statin on DAP-related MAEs in a large population."( Association Between Statin Use and Daptomycin-related Musculoskeletal Adverse Events: A Mixed Approach Combining a Meta-analysis and a Disproportionality Analysis.
Asada, M; Bando, T; Chuma, M; Goda, M; Hamano, H; Ishizawa, K; Izawa-Ishizawa, Y; Kondo, Y; Miyata, K; Nakamoto, A; Niimura, T; Okada, N; Takechi, K; Tasaki, Y; Yagi, K; Yanagawa, H; Yoshioka, T; Zamami, Y, 2022
)
0.72
" Subjects diagnosed with any type of dyslipidemia (population 4804) and received pitavastatin (interventions) versus comparator (comparison) with the primary efficacy endpoint of minimization of LDL-C and non- HDL-C, had an increase in HDL-C and/or reduction in major adverse cardiac events (MACE, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (fatal/nonfatal), and stroke (fatal/nonfatal) and/or their composite (outcomes)."( A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials on the Efficacy and Safety of Pitavastatin.
Alkaabi, M; Amoodi, AA; Baraka, MA; Don, J; Elnour, AA; Farah, FH; Mazrouei, NA; Ramadan, A; Sadeq, A; Sam, KG, 2023
)
0.91
"Drug-induced cardiotoxicity is a serious adverse effect that occurs during the administration of chemotherapeutic agents such as cyclophosphamide (CYC)."( Simvastatin cardioprotection in cyclophosphamide-induced toxicity via the modulation of inflammasome/caspase1/interleukin1β pathway.
Abdelzaher, WY; Bayoumi, AM; El-Hussieny, M; Refaie, MM; Shehata, S; Welson, NN,
)
1.57

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between simvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, and diltiazem, a calcium antagonist, were investigated in 7 male and 4 female patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" We also assessed the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between simvastatin and cyclosporine by comparing mean plasma concentrations of simvastatin beta-hydroxy acid, the major metabolite of the drug, in a group of heart transplant patients treated with cyclosporine and in a control group of patients who had not received heart transplants."( Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of simvastatin in heart transplant recipients.
Campana, C; Gavazzi, A; Iacona, I; Montemartini, C; Perani, G; Raddato, V; Regazzi, MB; Viganò, M, 1995
)
0.81
"The Division of Cardiology and the First Medical Clinic for the clinical study, as well as the Department of Pharmacology for the pharmacokinetic analysis."( Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of simvastatin in heart transplant recipients.
Campana, C; Gavazzi, A; Iacona, I; Montemartini, C; Perani, G; Raddato, V; Regazzi, MB; Viganò, M, 1995
)
0.57
" In addition, a pharmacodynamic assay has been developed that measures HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity."( Clinical pharmacokinetics and practical applications of simvastatin.
Mauro, VF, 1993
)
0.53
" There are no simple methods to investigate the concentration-dependent inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase in human pharmacodynamic studies."( Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Similarities and differences.
Fager, G; Lennernäs, H, 1997
)
0.3
" Using a population pharmacokinetic approach (implemented in P-PHARM software) the ratio of dose rate to trough concentration at steady state (DR/C[SS trough]), an estimation of apparent clearance, was determined."( Effect of simvastatin on cyclosporine unbound fraction and apparent blood clearance in heart transplant recipients.
Akhlaghi, F; Brown, KF; Keogh, AM; McLachlan, AJ, 1997
)
0.7
" Indeed, pharmacokinetic interactions (e."( New insights into the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of statins.
Baetta, R; Bellosta, S; Bernini, F; Corsini, A; Fumagalli, R; Paoletti, R, 1999
)
0.3
" The values for percent 14C exhaled during the first hour (for EBT) and the pharmacokinetic parameters of midazolam (AUC, Cmax, t1/2) were not affected following multiple once-daily oral doses of simvastatin 80 mg."( Simvastatin does not affect CYP3A activity, quantified by the erythromycin breath test and oral midazolam pharmacokinetics, in healthy male subjects.
Brucker, MJ; Gagliano, K; Gillen, L; Greenberg, HE; McLoughlin, D; Prueksaritanont, T; Rogers, JD; Vega, JM; Waldman, SA; Wong, PH, 2000
)
1.94
" Pharmacokinetic assessment was performed on days 14 and 28."( Pharmacokinetic interactions between nelfinavir and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors atorvastatin and simvastatin.
Hsyu, PH; Kerr, BM; Lewis, RH; Lillibridge, JH; Schultz-Smith, MD, 2001
)
0.52
"Fifty-six subjects completed both pharmacokinetic study days."( Pharmacokinetic interactions between protease inhibitors and statins in HIV seronegative volunteers: ACTG Study A5047.
Aberg, JA; Alston, B; Aweeka, F; Blaschke, T; Fang, F; Fichtenbaum, CJ; Gerber, JG; Kosel, B; Rosenkranz, SL; Segal, Y, 2002
)
0.31
"The goal of this study was to develop a preliminary pharmacodynamic model for dosing of the hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA)-reductase inhibitors simvastatin and atorvastatin using neural network analysis."( A preliminary evaluation of neural network analysis for pharmacodynamic modeling of the dosing of the hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A-reductase inhibitors simvastatin and atorvastatin.
Moon, A; Smith, T, 2002
)
0.71
" In Study 1, there were no indications of pharmacokinetic interactions between simvastatin and ezetimibe."( Pharmacodynamic interaction between the new selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe and simvastatin.
Affrime, MB; Batra, VK; Cutler, DL; Kosoglou, T; Maxwell, SE; Mellars, L; Meyer, I; Patrick, JE; Statkevich, P; Veltri, EP; Yang, B; Zhu, Y, 2002
)
0.76
"To investigate in vivo the mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between bosentan and simvastatin, a CYP3A4 substrate."( Investigation of the mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, and simvastatin.
Dingemanse, J; Schaarschmidt, D; van Giersbergen, PL, 2003
)
0.75
" The pharmacokinetic parameters of bosentan and its metabolites were not influenced by concomitant treatment with simvastatin: areas under the plasma concentration-time curve over one administration interval of 12 hours (AUC(tau)) [geometric mean and 95% CI] were 4586 (3719-5656) and 4928 (3945-6156) micro g * h/L."( Investigation of the mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, and simvastatin.
Dingemanse, J; Schaarschmidt, D; van Giersbergen, PL, 2003
)
0.74
" Treatments were compared for the pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-infinity, Cmax, tmax, and t 1/2 of highly lipophilic drugs and active metabolites."( Effects of orlistat, a lipase inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of three highly lipophilic drugs (amiodarone, fluoxetine, and simvastatin) in healthy volunteers.
Kanitra, L; Moore, R; Mulligan, TE; Zhi, J, 2003
)
0.52
" The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-variant), C(MAX), T(MAX), T(1/2) and elimination rate constant were determined from plasma concentration-time profile for both formulations and were compared statistically to evaluate bioequivalence between the two brands, using the statistical modules recommended by FDA."( Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of two simvastatin 40 mg tablets (Simvast and Zocor) in healthy human volunteers.
Adel, A; Admour, I; Alam, SM; Astigarraga, RE; Dham, R; Idkaidek, N; Najib, NM; Nucci, GD, 2003
)
0.57
" Compared to administration of repaglinide alone, concomitant ketoconazole increased mean AUC0-infinity for repaglinide by 15% and mean Cmax by 7%."( Influence of drugs interacting with CYP3A4 on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the prandial glucose regulator repaglinide.
Hansen, KT; Hatorp, V; Thomsen, MS, 2003
)
0.32
" Two additional blood samples were taken for imatinib pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment on day 8 before, and 24 h after, imatinib administration."( Effects of imatinib mesylate (STI571, Glivec) on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin, a cytochrome p450 3A4 substrate, in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia.
Beck, J; Bond, E; Capdeville, R; Dutreix, C; Fischer, T; Huber, C; Mehring, G; Meinhardt, P; Milosavljev, S; O'Brien, SG; Peng, B, 2003
)
0.55
" A 2-period, randomized, open-label, crossover study was conducted in 12 subjects to determine if fenofibrate and simvastatin are subject to a clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction at steady state."( Simvastatin does not have a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction with fenofibrate in humans.
Bergman, AJ; Burke, J; Hartford, A; He, W; Lasseter, KC; Liu, L; Murphy, G; Paolini, JF; Prueksaritanont, T; Qiu, Y; Valesky, R; Vega, JM; Zhao, JJ, 2004
)
1.98
" Studies compared the multiple-dose pharmacokinetic interaction profiles of pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin when coadministered with 4 inhibitors of cytochrome P450-3A4 isoenzymes in healthy subjects."( Comparative pharmacokinetic interaction profiles of pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin when coadministered with cytochrome P450 inhibitors.
Jacobson, TA, 2004
)
0.78
"Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between simvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, and diltiazem, a calcium antagonist, were investigated in 7 male and 4 female patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between simvastatin and diltiazem in patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension.
Hayashi, H; Ishizaki, T; Kosuge, K; Nishio, S; Ohashi, K; Satoh, H; Uchida, S; Watanabe, H; Yamada, H, 2004
)
0.81
"Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) are one of the most widely prescribed classes of drugs throughout the world, because of their excellent cholesterol-lowering effect and overall safety profile except for rare but fatal rhabdomyolysis arising either directly or indirectly by pharmacokinetic interactions with certain other drugs."( A literature search on pharmacokinetic drug interactions of statins and analysis of how such interactions are reflected in package inserts in Japan.
Hasegawa, R; Hirata-Koizumi, M; Miyake, S; Saito, M; Urano, T, 2005
)
0.33
"A MEDLINE search from 1996 to June 2004 was carried out to identify studies on clinical pharmacokinetic drug interactions for the five statins."( A literature search on pharmacokinetic drug interactions of statins and analysis of how such interactions are reflected in package inserts in Japan.
Hasegawa, R; Hirata-Koizumi, M; Miyake, S; Saito, M; Urano, T, 2005
)
0.33
"All pharmacokinetic drug interactions including relevant quantitative data for potential effectors and details on mechanisms of interaction need to be given in package inserts as soon as the information becomes available, to ensure safe and proper use of the drugs concerned."( A literature search on pharmacokinetic drug interactions of statins and analysis of how such interactions are reflected in package inserts in Japan.
Hasegawa, R; Hirata-Koizumi, M; Miyake, S; Saito, M; Urano, T, 2005
)
0.33
" The serum concentration of cerivastatin showed that the half-life of cerivastatin in this patient was 22."( Clearance rates of cerivastatin metabolites in a patient with cerivastatin-induced rhabdomyolysis.
Ishii, T; Ishikawa, CT; Miyashita, Y; Murano, T; Ozaki, H; Shirai, K; Toyoda, A, 2005
)
0.33
"To characterize the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin (SV) and simvastatin acid (SVA), a lactone-acid pair known to undergo reversible metabolism, and to better understand mechanisms underlying pharmacokinetic interactions observed between SV and gemfibrozil."( Interconversion pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and its hydroxy acid in dogs: effects of gemfibrozil.
Brunner, J; Lin, JH; Michel, K; Mu, L; Prueksaritanont, T; Qiu, Y; Richards, KM, 2005
)
0.87
" Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained immediately before and up to 72 hours after administration during each of the 4 treatment periods."( An open-label, crossover study of the pharmacokinetics of Insoluble Drug Delivery-MicroParticle fenofibrate in combination with atorvastatin, simvastatin, and extended-release niacin in healthy volunteers.
Braun, SL; Guha-Ray, DK; Penn, R; Rains, KT; Sawyers, WG; Williams, RX, 2006
)
0.54
" However, other pharmacokinetic parameters including peak plasma concentrations and half-life did not show any difference between genotype groups."( Effect of polymorphic CYP3A5 genotype on the single-dose simvastatin pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects.
Kang, DK; Kim, KA; Lee, OJ; Park, JY; Park, PW, 2007
)
0.58
"The potential for a pharmacokinetic drug interaction between valsartan, an antihypertensive drug, and simvastatin, a lipid-lowering agent, was investigated in this study."( Evaluation of a pharmacokinetic interaction between valsartan and simvastatin in healthy subjects.
Humbert, H; Pommier, F; Prasad, P; Reynolds, CV; Sunkara, G; Yeh, C, 2007
)
0.79
" There fore, this study was conducted to determine the potential for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between vildagliptin and simvastatin at steady-state."( Evaluation of the potential for steady-state pharmacokinetic interaction between vildagliptin and simvastatin in healthy subjects.
Ayalasomayajula, SP; Campestrini, J; Dole, K; He, YL; Humbert, H; Ligueros-Saylan, M; Sunkara, G; Wang, Y, 2007
)
0.76
" Pharmacokinetic and statistical analyses were performed using WinNonlin and SAS, respectively."( Evaluation of the potential for steady-state pharmacokinetic interaction between vildagliptin and simvastatin in healthy subjects.
Ayalasomayajula, SP; Campestrini, J; Dole, K; He, YL; Humbert, H; Ligueros-Saylan, M; Sunkara, G; Wang, Y, 2007
)
0.56
" The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetic interactions of mipomersen sodium with simvastatin and ezetimibe."( Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction of mipomersen sodium (ISIS 301012), a 2'-O-methoxyethyl modified antisense oligonucleotide targeting apolipoprotein B-100 messenger RNA, with simvastatin and ezetimibe.
Flaim, JD; Geary, RS; Riley, GC; Tribble, DL; vanVliet, AA; Wedel, MK; Yu, RZ, 2009
)
0.76
" Mipomersen sodium pharmacokinetic profiles were assessed following the first dose (mipomersen sodium alone) and the last dose (mipomersen sodium in combination with simvastatin or ezetimibe)."( Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction of mipomersen sodium (ISIS 301012), a 2'-O-methoxyethyl modified antisense oligonucleotide targeting apolipoprotein B-100 messenger RNA, with simvastatin and ezetimibe.
Flaim, JD; Geary, RS; Riley, GC; Tribble, DL; vanVliet, AA; Wedel, MK; Yu, RZ, 2009
)
0.74
"The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 24 hours (AUC(24)), maximum plasma concentration and apparent elimination half-life values of mipomersen sodium were similar when administered alone and in combination with oral simvastatin or oral ezetimibe."( Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction of mipomersen sodium (ISIS 301012), a 2'-O-methoxyethyl modified antisense oligonucleotide targeting apolipoprotein B-100 messenger RNA, with simvastatin and ezetimibe.
Flaim, JD; Geary, RS; Riley, GC; Tribble, DL; vanVliet, AA; Wedel, MK; Yu, RZ, 2009
)
0.73
"These data provide evidence that mipomersen sodium exhibits no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions with the disposition and clearance of simvastatin or ezetimibe, and vice versa."( Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction of mipomersen sodium (ISIS 301012), a 2'-O-methoxyethyl modified antisense oligonucleotide targeting apolipoprotein B-100 messenger RNA, with simvastatin and ezetimibe.
Flaim, JD; Geary, RS; Riley, GC; Tribble, DL; vanVliet, AA; Wedel, MK; Yu, RZ, 2009
)
0.74
"ABCB1 haplotypes were determined in 534 healthy Finnish volunteers, of whom 24 participated in a pharmacokinetic study on simvastatin and atorvastatin."( ABCB1 haplotypes differentially affect the pharmacokinetics of the acid and lactone forms of simvastatin and atorvastatin.
Keskitalo, JE; Kurkinen, KJ; Neuvoneni, PJ; Niemi, M, 2008
)
0.77
" This novel method has been applied to human pharmacokinetic study."( Development and validation of a highly sensitive and robust LC-ESI-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantitation of simvastatin acid, amlodipine and valsartan in human plasma: application to a clinical pharmacokinetic study.
Mullangi, R; Ramani, AV; Sengupta, P, 2009
)
0.56
" Both juices did not have a significant effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of either simvastatin lactone (SVL) or its active metabolite simvastatin hydroxy acid (SVA) when administered concomitantly in a dose of 20 mg/kg over 28 days."( Toxicological and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Concomitant Intake of Grapefruit Juice and Simvastatin in Rats after Repeated Treatment over 28 Days.
Butterweck, V; Derendorf, H; Frye, R; Galloway, C; Zdrojewski, I, 2009
)
0.79
" Because of the likely use of anacetrapib with hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, we aimed to evaluate the potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction with simvastatin."( Assessment of a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between simvastatin and anacetrapib, a potent cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, in healthy subjects.
Bieberdorf, FA; Chodakewitz, J; Garg, A; Jin, B; Keshavarz, SS; Krishna, R; Wagner, JA, 2009
)
0.78
"There appears to be no clinically meaningful effect of anacetrapib on the pharmacokinetic parameters of simvastatin."( Assessment of a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between simvastatin and anacetrapib, a potent cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, in healthy subjects.
Bieberdorf, FA; Chodakewitz, J; Garg, A; Jin, B; Keshavarz, SS; Krishna, R; Wagner, JA, 2009
)
0.8
" The pharmacokinetic parameters of verapamil and norverapamil in rats were determined after the oral administration of verapamil (9 mg/kg) in the presence or absence of simvastatin (0."( Effects of simvastatin on the pharmacokinetics of verapamil and its main metabolite, norverapamil, in rats.
Choi, DH; Choi, JS; Li, C,
)
0.72
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for both simvastatin (the inactive prodrug) and simvastatin acid (the active moiety)."( Pharmacokinetic comparison of controlled-release and immediate-release oral formulations of simvastatin in healthy Korean subjects: a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, single- and multiple-dose study.
Jang, SB; Kim, KH; Kim, YI; Kwon, BJ; Lee, YJ; Lim, LA; Park, K; Park, KM; Park, MS; Woo, JS, 2010
)
0.83
"To explore if non-concurrent amlodipine dosing results in less drug interaction, the pharmacokinetic profiles, safety and efficacy endpoints were assessed following repeated doses of simvastatin, co-administered concurrently or non-concurrently with amlodipine in patients with coexisting hypertension and hyperlipidemia."( Non-concurrent dosing attenuates the pharmacokinetic interaction between amlodipine and simvastatin.
Choi, JW; Kim, SH; Lee, H; Lee, SJ; Lim, HE; Park, CG, 2010
)
0.77
"The Cmax and AUClast and of simvastatin acid in the non-concurrent amlodipine dosing group were 63."( Non-concurrent dosing attenuates the pharmacokinetic interaction between amlodipine and simvastatin.
Choi, JW; Kim, SH; Lee, H; Lee, SJ; Lim, HE; Park, CG, 2010
)
0.88
"This was an open-label, randomized, three-period, multiple-dose crossover study that assessed the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between extended-release niacin and ezetimibe/simvastatin and their major metabolites."( Assessment of potential pharmacokinetic interactions of ezetimibe/simvastatin and extended-release niacin tablets in healthy subjects.
Cutler, DL; Kim, KT; Kosoglou, T; Statkevich, P; Taggart, W; Triantafyllou, I; Xuan, F; Zhu, Y, 2011
)
0.8
"There is a small pharmacokinetic drug interaction between ER niacin and ezetimibe/simvastatin and although this is not considered to be clinically significant, the concomitant use of these drugs should be appropriately monitored, especially during the niacin titration period."( Assessment of potential pharmacokinetic interactions of ezetimibe/simvastatin and extended-release niacin tablets in healthy subjects.
Cutler, DL; Kim, KT; Kosoglou, T; Statkevich, P; Taggart, W; Triantafyllou, I; Xuan, F; Zhu, Y, 2011
)
0.83
" Pharmacokinetic parameters of losartan and EXP-3174 in rats were determined after oral and intravenous administration of losartan (9 mg/kg) without and with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (1 mg/kg)."( Effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of losartan and its main metabolite EXP-3174 in rats: possible role of CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibition by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
Choi, DH; Choi, JS; Yang, SH, 2011
)
0.37
" Pharmacokinetic results suggest that simvastatin is not likely to compromise the activity of anastrozole."( Effect of simvastatin on the pharmacokinetics of anastrozole.
Bao, T; Blackford, AL; Stearns, V, 2012
)
1.05
" The aim of these studies was to assess the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between dapagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor being developed for the treatment of T2DM, and four medications commonly prescribed in patients with T2DM and cardiovascular disease: simvastatin, valsartan, warfarin, and digoxin."( Lack of pharmacokinetic interactions between dapagliflozin and simvastatin, valsartan, warfarin, or digoxin.
Boulton, DW; Chang, M; Griffen, SC; Kasichayanula, S; LaCreta, FP; Liu, X; Shyu, WC, 2012
)
0.79
"Potential pharmacokinetic interactions between 20 mg dapagliflozin, 40 mg simvastatin, or 320 mg valsartan were assessed in an open-label, randomized, five-period, five-treatment, unbalanced crossover study in 24 healthy subjects."( Lack of pharmacokinetic interactions between dapagliflozin and simvastatin, valsartan, warfarin, or digoxin.
Boulton, DW; Chang, M; Griffen, SC; Kasichayanula, S; LaCreta, FP; Liu, X; Shyu, WC, 2012
)
0.85
" The pharmacokinetic parameters of diltiazem and desacetyldiltiazem were determined after oral and intravenous administration of diltiazem to rats in the presence and absence of simvastatin (0."( Effects of simvastatin on the pharmacokinetics of diltiazem and its main metabolite, desacetyldiltiazem, after oral and intravenous administration in rats: possible role of P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4 inhibition by simvastatin.
Choi, DH; Choi, JS; Li, C, 2011
)
0.95
" The developed assay was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in human volunteers."( Simultaneous determination of sitagliptin and simvastatin in human plasma by LC-MS/MS and its application to a human pharmacokinetic study.
Burugula, L; Kandhagatla, R; Lodagala, DS; Makula, A; Mullangi, R; Pilli, NR, 2013
)
0.65
"In the absence of clinical studies, the ability to project the direction and the magnitude of changes in bioavailability of drug therapy, using evidence-based mechanistic pharmacokinetic in silico models would be of significant value in guiding prescribers to make the necessary adjustments to dosage regimens for an increasing population of patients who are undergoing bariatric surgery."( A mechanistic pharmacokinetic model to assess modified oral drug bioavailability post bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients: interplay between CYP3A gut wall metabolism, permeability and dissolution.
Ammori, BJ; Ashcroft, DM; Darwich, AS; Jamei, M; Pade, D; Rostami-Hodjegan, A, 2012
)
0.38
"4) in the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0-∞)), and terminal half-life (t(1/2)), respectively, of midazolam; the time to peak plasma concentration (t(max)) was unchanged."( Pharmacokinetic interactions of almorexant with midazolam and simvastatin, two CYP3A4 model substrates, in healthy male subjects.
Alessi, F; Dingemanse, J; Hoch, M; Hoever, P; Theodor, R, 2013
)
0.63
" The pharmacokinetic parameters for ezetimibe and simvastatin were assessed by determining total ezetimibe, free ezetimibe, simvastatin and simvastatin acid concentrations using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin combination tablet: an open-label, single-dose study in healthy Chinese subjects.
Chen, WL; Chu, NN; Li, XN; Xu, HR, 2012
)
0.9
"The pharmacokinetic parameters (mean ± SD) for total ezetimibe and free ezetimibe following a single dose were: maximum plasma drug concentration (C(max)) 81."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin combination tablet: an open-label, single-dose study in healthy Chinese subjects.
Chen, WL; Chu, NN; Li, XN; Xu, HR, 2012
)
0.64
" GBE administration reduced mean simvastatin area under the curve (AUC)0-24, AUC0-∞ and Cmax by 39% (p = 0."( Assessment of a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between simvastatin and Ginkgo biloba extracts in healthy subjects.
Chen, Y; Dai, LL; Fan, L; Peng, XD; Shen, MX; Tan, ZR; Wu, HZ; Yang, GP; Zhou, HH, 2013
)
0.9
"A pharmacokinetic study of simvastatin (single oral dose, 40 mg) was conducted in 17 healthy Chinese volunteers."( Simvastatin pharmacokinetics in healthy Chinese subjects and its relations with CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, ABCG2 and SLCO1B1 polymorphisms.
Jiang, B; Ruan, ZR; Yuan, H; Zeng, S; Zhou, Q, 2013
)
2.13
" A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was used to quantitatively predict the impact of interleukin-6 (IL-6) on sensitive CYP3A4 substrates."( A physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approach to predict disease-drug interactions: suppression of CYP3A by IL-6.
Almond, LM; Gardner, I; Jamei, M; Joshi, A; Kenny, JR; Machavaram, KK; Rostami-Hodjegan, A; Tay, S; Wong, S, 2013
)
0.39
" In a pharmacodynamic study, the percent increase in cholesterol was less with PAMAM dendrimer formulations as compared to pure drug."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of poly(amidoamine) dendrimer based simvastatin oral formulations for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia.
Chauhan, AS; Kulhari, DP; Kulhari, H; Prajapati, SK, 2013
)
0.62
" The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for differences between Test (SMV under co-administration with ESL) and Reference (SMV administered alone) treatments for AUC0-∞, AUC0-t and Cmax of SMV and SMV-acid."( Effect of repeated administration of eslicarbazepine acetate on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin in healthy subjects.
Falcão, A; Nunes, T; Pinto, R; Soares-da-Silva, P, 2013
)
0.61
" A semi-physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (semi-PBPK) characterizing mechanism-based auto-inhibition was developed to predict the stereoselective pharmacokinetic profiles of verapamil and norverapamil following single or multiple oral doses."( A semi-physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model characterizing mechanism-based auto-inhibition to predict stereoselective pharmacokinetics of verapamil and its metabolite norverapamil in human.
Liu, L; Liu, X; Sai, Y; Wang, D; Wang, J; Xia, S; Xue, W, 2013
)
0.39
" In conclusion, this study has quantitatively described the pharmacokinetic interaction between simvastatin and amlodipine using a modeling approach."( Development of a pharmacokinetic interaction model for co-administration of simvastatin and amlodipine.
Jang, SB; Lee, D; Lim, LA; Park, K; Roh, H; Son, H, 2014
)
0.85
" The final population pharmacokinetic model shows that the elimination rate constant for simvastatin acid, the active form by hydrolysis of its lactone prodrug (i."( Genetic algorithm guided population pharmacokinetic model development for simvastatin, concurrently or non-concurrently co-administered with amlodipine.
Chaturvedula, A; Lee, H; Sale, ME, 2014
)
0.86
" Pharmacokinetic parameters on days 1 and 7 were compared."( Pharmacokinetics of niacin, simvastatin and their metabolites in healthy Chinese subjects after single and multiple doses of a fixed dose combination tablet of niacin extended release/simvastatin.
Han, J; Liu, HC; Liu, M; Wang, XL; Wang, ZL; Yang, M; Zhang, D; Zhang, YN, 2014
)
0.7
"Although organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)-mediated hepatic uptake is generally conserved between rodents and humans at a gross pharmacokinetic level, the presence of three major hepatic OATPs with broad overlap in substrate and inhibitor affinity, and absence of rodent-human orthologs preclude clinical translation of single-gene knockout/knockin findings."( Utility of Oatp1a/1b-knockout and OATP1B1/3-humanized mice in the study of OATP-mediated pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution: case studies with pravastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, and carboxydichlorofluorescein.
Bao, JQ; Fallon, JK; Higgins, JW; Ke, AB; Manro, JR; Smith, PC; Zamek-Gliszczynski, MJ, 2014
)
0.6
"There were no significant associations between the pharmacokinetic parameters of simvastatin lactone and gender."( Pharmacokinetics of simvastatin lactone and its active metabolite simvastatin hydroxy acid in healthy Chinese male and female volunteers.
Cai, Y; Huang, J; Ren, X; Song, Y; Wang, X; Xu, H; Yang, W; Zhang, LR; Zhang, S; Zhang, T; Zhao, D; Zuo, M, 2014
)
0.95
" Plasma concentrations of simvastatin and simvastatin acid were measured in 2,182 and 2,130 samples, respectively, and the pharmacokinetic data were analyzed using NONMEM."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis of simvastatin and its active metabolite with the characterization of atypical complex absorption kinetics.
Bae, KS; Cho, SH; Choe, S; Ghim, JL; Jin, SJ; Jung, JA; Kim, HS; Kim, U; Lim, HS; Noh, YH; Park, HJ, 2014
)
0.97
" Pharmacokinetic modeling preferred the inter-conversion between simvastatin and simvastatin acid."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis of simvastatin and its active metabolite with the characterization of atypical complex absorption kinetics.
Bae, KS; Cho, SH; Choe, S; Ghim, JL; Jin, SJ; Jung, JA; Kim, HS; Kim, U; Lim, HS; Noh, YH; Park, HJ, 2014
)
0.91
"A pharmacokinetic model describing the complex, multiple peak, absorption kinetics of simvastatin was formulated using three parallel, mixed zero and first-order absorptions."( Population pharmacokinetic analysis of simvastatin and its active metabolite with the characterization of atypical complex absorption kinetics.
Bae, KS; Cho, SH; Choe, S; Ghim, JL; Jin, SJ; Jung, JA; Kim, HS; Kim, U; Lim, HS; Noh, YH; Park, HJ, 2014
)
0.9
"The aim of this work was to develop a joint population pharmacokinetic model for simvastatin (SV) and its active metabolite, simvastatin acid (SVA), that incorporates the effects of multiple genetic polymorphisms and clinical/demographic characteristics."( Identification of the effect of multiple polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and simvastatin acid using a population-modeling approach.
Aarons, L; Dickinson, G; Galetin, A; Guo, Y; Hall, S; Rostami-Hodjegan, A; Tsamandouras, N, 2014
)
0.85
" The findings imply that the observed pharmacokinetic interaction is unlikely clinically relevant, and support the combined use of simvastatin and fenofibrate not only given at staggered interval but also given simultaneously."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between simvastatin and fenofibrate with staggered and simultaneous dosing: Does it matter?
Ansquer, JC; Aubonnet, P; Beckmann, K; Driessen, S; Lehnick, D; Mihara, K; Olbrich, M; Piskol, G; van Amsterdam, P; van Assche, H; Winsemius, A, 2014
)
0.88
" Three separate open-label, randomized, crossover studies evaluated the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between extended-release niacin (with and without concomitant laropiprant) and simvastatin in healthy subjects."( Effects of Extended-Release Niacin and Extended-Release Niacin/Laropiprant on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin in Healthy Subjects.
Crumley, T; De Kam, PJ; Dishy, V; Lai, E; Lauring, B; Liu, F; Sisk, C; Wagner, J; Wenning, L,
)
0.54
"No relevant drug-drug interaction was observed, and pharmacokinetic results suggest that no dose adjustments for either drug are necessary when empagliflozin and simvastatin are co-administered."( Pharmacokinetics of empagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, and simvastatin following co-administration in healthy volunteers.
Broedl, UC; Lang, B; Macha, S; Pinnetti, S, 2014
)
0.82
"To develop a population physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for simvastatin (SV) and its active metabolite, simvastatin acid (SVA), that allows extrapolation and prediction of their concentration profiles in liver (efficacy) and muscle (toxicity)."( Development and Application of a Mechanistic Pharmacokinetic Model for Simvastatin and its Active Metabolite Simvastatin Acid Using an Integrated Population PBPK Approach.
Aarons, L; Dickinson, G; Galetin, A; Guo, Y; Hall, S; Rostami-Hodjegan, A; Tsamandouras, N, 2015
)
0.88
" At present, pharmacokinetic data of the interaction between both drugs are available."( A pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction model of simvastatin and clarithromycin in humans.
Chaiwong, K; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J; Pongpanich, K; Sonsingh, P, 2014
)
0.66
"Selected pharmacokinetic interaction study was obtained from PubMed search."( A pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction model of simvastatin and clarithromycin in humans.
Chaiwong, K; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J; Pongpanich, K; Sonsingh, P, 2014
)
0.66
" Even though, pharmacokinetic data regarding the interaction between both drugs have been published, their use is limited to semiquantitative applications."( A pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction model of simvastatin and verapamil in humans.
Chamnansua, M; Kaewdang, N; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J, 2014
)
0.66
"Eligible pharmacokinetic interaction study between simvastatin and verapamil in humans was selected from PubMed database."( A pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction model of simvastatin and verapamil in humans.
Chamnansua, M; Kaewdang, N; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J, 2014
)
0.91
" The final model adequately describes pharmacokinetic interaction between simvastatin and verapamil which can be helpful in prediction of rhabdomyolysis in patients with concurrent use of these drugs."( A pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction model of simvastatin and verapamil in humans.
Chamnansua, M; Kaewdang, N; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J, 2014
)
0.89
"Eligible pharmacokinetic studies were selected from Pubmed database and concentration time course data were digitally extracted and used for model development."( Pharmacokinetic modeling of simvastatin, nelfinavir and their interaction in humans.
Jindasri, W; Kraiboot, A; Kunyamee, P; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J; Wattanasaovaluk, W, 2014
)
0.7
"Three compartmental pharmacokinetic models were successfully developed."( Pharmacokinetic modeling of simvastatin, nelfinavir and their interaction in humans.
Jindasri, W; Kraiboot, A; Kunyamee, P; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J; Wattanasaovaluk, W, 2014
)
0.7
"Simvastatin-nelfinavir pharmacokinetic interaction can be explained by our final model."( Pharmacokinetic modeling of simvastatin, nelfinavir and their interaction in humans.
Jindasri, W; Kraiboot, A; Kunyamee, P; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J; Wattanasaovaluk, W, 2014
)
2.14
"Volume of distribution is one of the most important pharmacokinetic properties of a drug candidate."( Volume of Distribution in Drug Design.
Beaumont, K; Di, L; Maurer, TS; Smith, DA, 2015
)
0.42
" An open-label, randomized, 5-period crossover study in healthy Chinese was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction and tolerability of multiple doses of certain TCMs on a single dose of simvastatin."( Effects of four traditional Chinese medicines on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
Hu, P; Jiang, J; Zhao, Q, 2015
)
0.84
" Clopidogrel 75 mg (day 3) had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetic variables of simvastatin or simvastatin acid compared with placebo."( Clopidogrel Has No Clinically Meaningful Effect on the Pharmacokinetics of the Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 1B1 and Cytochrome P450 3A4 Substrate Simvastatin.
Backman, JT; Itkonen, MK; Neuvonen, M; Neuvonen, PJ; Niemi, M; Tornio, A, 2015
)
0.84
" ratio of simvastatin acid to simvastatin), whereas the SLCO1B1 rs4149056 and CYP2D6*5 variants were related to a higher Cmax ratio."( Impact of CYP2D6, CYP3A5, CYP2C19, CYP2A6, SLCO1B1, ABCB1, and ABCG2 gene polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and simvastatin acid.
Bae, KS; Cho, SH; Choe, S; Choi, HY; Ghim, JL; Jin, SJ; Jung, JA; Kim, HS; Lim, HS, 2015
)
1.03
"To evaluate the potential pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD, glucose-lowering effect) interaction between simvastatin and piragliatin, both CYP3A substrates, 30 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus participated in this open-label, randomized, 6-sequence, 3-way crossover (William's design) study."( Lack of Potential Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions Between Piragliatin, a Glucokinase Activator, and Simvastatin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Boldrin, M; Georgy, A; Liang, Z; Zhai, S; Zhi, J, 2016
)
0.85
" The proposed method was applied to the drug-drug pharmacokinetic interaction study of SV combined with BBR after oral administration in rats."( Validated UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of simvastatin, simvastatin hydroxy acid and berberine in rat plasma: Application to the drug-drug pharmacokinetic interaction study of simvastatin combined with berberine after oral administratio
Li, G; Liu, M; Su, X; Zhao, G; Zhao, L, 2015
)
0.66
" Even though pharmacokinetic data regarding such interaction are available, they cannot be used for quantitative prediction."( Pharmacokinetic model for the inhibition of simvastatin metabolism by itraconazole.
Chan-Im, D; Chiang-Ngernthanyakool, R; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J; Phaohorm, S; Tongpeng, W, 2015
)
0.68
"Published data involving pharmacokinetic of simvastatin, itraconazole, and pharmacokinetic interaction between simvastatin and itraconazole were selected from PubMed search."( Pharmacokinetic model for the inhibition of simvastatin metabolism by itraconazole.
Chan-Im, D; Chiang-Ngernthanyakool, R; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J; Phaohorm, S; Tongpeng, W, 2015
)
0.94
" The present studies assessed the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between fostamatinib and the commonly prescribed medications oral contraceptive (OC), warfarin, and statins (rosuvastatin, simvastatin) in healthy subjects."( Effects of Fostamatinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Contraceptive, Warfarin, and the Statins Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin: Results From Phase I Clinical Studies.
Brealey, C; Elsby, R; Gillen, M; Holmes, V; Martin, P; Mathews, D; Oliver, S; Ritter, J; Severin, P; Surry, D, 2016
)
0.83
" Fostamatinib increased rosuvastatin AUC by 96% (CI 78-115) and Cmax by 88% (CI 69-110), and increased simvastatin acid AUC by 74% (CI 50-102) and Cmax by 83% (CI 57-113)."( Effects of Fostamatinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Contraceptive, Warfarin, and the Statins Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin: Results From Phase I Clinical Studies.
Brealey, C; Elsby, R; Gillen, M; Holmes, V; Martin, P; Mathews, D; Oliver, S; Ritter, J; Severin, P; Surry, D, 2016
)
0.86
"To examine whether strict control of clinical trial conditions could reduce apparent differences of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters among ethnic groups."( Absence of ethnic differences in the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin, simvastatin, and meloxicam among three East Asian populations and Caucasians.
Hasunuma, T; Jang, IJ; Kaneko, M; Kaniwa, N; Kawai, S; Saito, Y; Takeuchi, M; Tohkin, M; Uyama, Y; Watanabe, H; Yamazoe, Y; Yimin, C, 2016
)
0.67
" Cmax values of moxifloxacin and simvastatin, but not meloxicam, showed significant differences."( Absence of ethnic differences in the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin, simvastatin, and meloxicam among three East Asian populations and Caucasians.
Hasunuma, T; Jang, IJ; Kaneko, M; Kaniwa, N; Kawai, S; Saito, Y; Takeuchi, M; Tohkin, M; Uyama, Y; Watanabe, H; Yamazoe, Y; Yimin, C, 2016
)
0.95
"To investigate the effect of Shexiang Baoxin Pill (SBP), a tranditional Chinese medicine, on the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of simvastatin in healthy volunteers' plasma, a quantitative method was developed using an Agilent G6410A rapid performance liquid chromatography (RPLC) coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry system."( The pharmacokinetic characters of simvastatin after co-administration with Shexiang Baoxin Pill in healthy volunteers' plasma.
Jiang, P; Li, M; Liu, R; Peng, C; Tao, J; Zhang, W, 2016
)
0.92
" The method has been successfully applied in clinical pharmacokinetic study in the Indian population."( Development and Validation of an LC-MS-MS Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Simvastatin, Simvastatin Acid and Ezetimibe in Human Plasma and Its Application to Pharmacokinetic Study in the Indian Population.
Bonga, PB; Munaga, SB; Rao, VS; Sharma, HK; Valluru, RK, 2016
)
0.66
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed at prespecified intervals."( Effect of canagliflozin on the pharmacokinetics of glyburide, metformin, and simvastatin in healthy participants.
Devineni, D; Mamidi, RN; Manitpisitkul, P; Murphy, J; Skee, D; Stieltjes, H; Tian, H; Usiskin, K; Vandebosch, A; Verhaeghe, T; Wajs, E; Wang, SS,
)
0.36
" A new model was developed for the prediction of AUC of statins that utilized the slopes of the above 2 models, with pharmacokinetic (Cmax) and a pharmacodynamic (IC50 value) components for the statins."( Dual Incorporation of the in vitro Data (IC50) and in vivo (Cmax) Data for the Prediction of Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Statins using Regression Models Developed for Either Pravastatin or Simvastatin.
Srinivas, NR, 2016
)
0.62
" The method was successfully applied to characterize the pharmacokinetic profiles of SV and SVA following an oral administration of 40 mg SV tablet to healthy human volunteers."( Development and Validation of an LC-MS-MS Method for Determination of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid in Human Plasma: Application to a Pharmacokinetic Study.
Monif, T; Partani, P; Verma, SM, 2016
)
0.67
" GSK2647544 was readily absorbed and its plasma concentration declined bi-exponentially with a terminal half-life ranging from 8 to 16 hours."( Evaluation of the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and drug-drug interaction potential of a selective Lp-PLA2 inhibitor (GSK2647544) in healthy volunteers
.
Fong, R; Gray, F; Guiney, W; Lockhart, A; Wu, K; Xu, J; Xu, Y; Yao, X, 2016
)
0.43
"OM3-CA did not affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of warfarin or the pharmacodynamic effects of ASA."( No Effect of Omega-3 Carboxylic Acids on Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Warfarin or on Platelet Function When Co-administered with Acetylsalicylic Acid: Results of Two Phase I Studies in Healthy Volunteers.
Davidson, M; Nilsson, C; Offman, E, 2017
)
0.46
"The aim of the article was to assess the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between OM3-CA and the statins rosuvastatin and simvastatin."( Assessment of pharmacokinetic interaction between omega-3 carboxylic acids and the statins rosuvastatin and simvastatin: Results of 2 phase I studies in healthy volunteers.
Davidson, M; Nilsson, C; Offman, E,
)
0.55
" Lack of a drug-drug interaction was declared if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric least-squares mean ratio of pharmacokinetic parameters was in the range 80% to 125%."( Assessment of pharmacokinetic interaction between omega-3 carboxylic acids and the statins rosuvastatin and simvastatin: Results of 2 phase I studies in healthy volunteers.
Davidson, M; Nilsson, C; Offman, E,
)
0.34
" Evaluation of potential pharmacodynamic interaction was based on the behavioral tests: elevated plus maze (EPM) test and the Vogel conflict test (VCT)."( Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between simvastatin and diazepam in rats.
Rutkowska, M; Słupski, W; Trocha, M, 2017
)
0.7
"Abolition of diazepam anxiolytic effect during concomitant use of simvastatin is probably caused by diminished bioavailability of diazepam, although pharmacodynamic interaction between these drugs cannot be excluded."( Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between simvastatin and diazepam in rats.
Rutkowska, M; Słupski, W; Trocha, M, 2017
)
0.94
" The aim of this study was to establish a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) parent-metabolite model of zoptarelin doxorubicin and to apply it for drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential analysis."( A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) parent-metabolite model of the chemotherapeutic zoptarelin doxorubicin-integration of in vitro results, Phase I and Phase II data and model application for drug-drug interaction potential analysis.
Aicher, B; Ammer, N; Britz, H; Hanke, N; Lehr, T; Moj, D; Sindermann, H; Teifel, M; Wojtyniak, JG, 2018
)
0.48
" Dissolution and pharmacokinetic studies indicated that the simvastatin/DMβCD complex exhibited an increased dissolution rate, rapid absorption, and improved bioavailability in rats compared to free drug."( Preparation and characterization of simvastatin/DMβCD complex and its pharmacokinetics in rats.
Fan, H; Gu, F; Ning, J; Wang, Y; Wu, C, 2018
)
1
" No significant changes were observed in pharmacokinetic parameters of SV and simvastatin hydroxy acid in the IA plus SV co-treated group in comparison with those in the group treated with SV alone."( Ilexgenin A enhances the effects of simvastatin on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease without changes in simvastatin pharmacokinetics.
Li, P; Lu, YW; Wen, XD; Yang, J; Zhang, L; Zhu, YC, 2018
)
0.98
" This study was to investigate whether and how CV drugs affect the pharmacokinetic profile of sinomenine."( Co-administration with simvastatin or lovastatin alters the pharmacokinetic profile of sinomenine in rats through cytochrome P450-mediated pathways.
Dai, Y; Jin, Y; Wang, M; Wang, Y; Xia, Y; Yun, X, 2018
)
0.79
" Coadministration of Fbt and Svt with Bbr had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of Bbr, except time to maximum concentration, apparent volume of distribution, and apparent clearance."( Pharmacokinetic interactions and tolerability of berberine chloride with simvastatin and fenofibrate: an open-label, randomized, parallel study in healthy Chinese subjects.
Li, G; Qiu, F; Sun, Y; Zhao, L; Zhao, M, 2019
)
0.75
" No clinically obvious pharmacokinetic interactions between Bbr and Fbt/Svt were observed with combined administration."( Pharmacokinetic interactions and tolerability of berberine chloride with simvastatin and fenofibrate: an open-label, randomized, parallel study in healthy Chinese subjects.
Li, G; Qiu, F; Sun, Y; Zhao, L; Zhao, M, 2019
)
0.75
" Plasma concentrations of simvastatin and its active metabolite, simvastatin acid, were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for pharmacokinetic assessment."( Effect of Cilostazol on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin in Healthy Subjects.
Ghim, JL; Huh, W; Jung, JA; Kim, JR; Kim, S; Ko, JW; Shin, JG, 2019
)
1.07
"A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was used to simulate the impact of elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-6 on the exposure of several orally administered cytochrome P450 (CYP) probe substrates (caffeine, S-warfarin, omeprazole, dextromethorphan, midazolam, and simvastatin)."( Simulating the Impact of Elevated Levels of Interleukin-6 on the Pharmacokinetics of Various CYP450 Substrates in Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica or Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders in Different Ethnic Populations.
Ducray, PS; Endo-Tsukude, C; Gardner, I; Gill, KL; Hatley, OJ; Machavaram, KK; Parrott, N; Terao, K, 2019
)
0.69
" This method was applied for studying the pharmacokinetic interactions in rats after oral co-administration of silymarin (45 mg/kg) and different concentrations of SV."( Effects of Silymarin on the In Vivo Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin and Its Active Metabolite in Rats.
Ding, CY; Dong, ZJ; Li, Y; Li, YJ; Meng, L; Wu, Y, 2019
)
0.76
" The aim of this study was to develop a joint population pharmacokinetic model for simvastatin and four metabolites in children and adolescents to investigate sources of variability in simvastatin acid exposure in this patient population, in addition to SLCO1B1 genotype status."( A population pharmacokinetic model for simvastatin and its metabolites in children and adolescents.
Abdel-Rahman, S; Galetin, A; Leeder, JS; Ogungbenro, K; Wagner, JB, 2019
)
1.01
"Plasma concentrations of simvastatin and its four metabolites, demographic and polymorphism data for OATP1B1 and CYP3A5 were analysed utilising a population pharmacokinetic modelling approach from an existing single oral dose (10 mg < 17 years and 20 mg ≥ 18 years) pharmacokinetic dataset of 32 children and adolescents."( A population pharmacokinetic model for simvastatin and its metabolites in children and adolescents.
Abdel-Rahman, S; Galetin, A; Leeder, JS; Ogungbenro, K; Wagner, JB, 2019
)
1.09
"The pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of drugs are affected in several ways by interactions with microbiota."( Impact of Vancomycin-Induced Changes in the Intestinal Microbiota on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin.
Cho, JY; Jang, IJ; Ji, SC; Kim, AH; Lee, S; Sunwoo, J; Yu, KS, 2020
)
0.78
" The optimized SMV-LST was evaluated for pharmacokinetic parameters and potential hypolipidemic activity on induced hyperlipidemic rats."( Enhancing the Hypolipidemic Effect of Simvastatin in Poloxamer-Induced Hyperlipidemic Rats via Liquisolid Approach: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation.
Ahmed, OAA; Ahmed, TA; El-Say, KM; Elimam, H, 2020
)
0.83
" A rare adverse interaction between simvastatin and abiraterone (Zytiga), an androgen biosynthesis inhibitor, was observed in a patient with mCRPC due to pharmacokinetic changes resulting from obstructive jaundice."( Statin-Induced Rhabdomyolysis Due to Pharmacokinetic Changes From Biliary Obstruction in a Patient With Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
Desikan, R; Desikan, SP; Fisher, A; Sobash, P,
)
0.41
" The aim of this study was to fabricate and optimize SIM encapsulated silica-lipid hybrids (SLH) as a solid-state lipid-based formulation to enhance absorption and bioavailability during a human in vivo pharmacokinetic study."( A safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic study of a novel simvastatin silica-lipid hybrid formulation in healthy male participants.
Abuhelwa, AY; Clifton, P; Joyce, P; Meola, TR; Prestidge, CA, 2021
)
0.86
" Because pharmacodynamic interaction between statins and bempedoic acid is complex, a dose-response model was developed to predict LDL-C pharmacodynamics following administration of statins combined with bempedoic acid."( Pharmacodynamic effect of bempedoic acid and statin combinations: predictions from a dose-response model.
Amore, BM; Barrett, PHR; Catapano, AL; Chapel, S; Crass, RL; Emery, MG; Jadhav, SB; Kerschnitzki, M; Sasiela, WJ; Watts, GF, 2022
)
0.72
" We evaluated the use of pharmacokinetic measurements to monitor adherence to simvastatin in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD)."( Monitoring Simvastatin Adherence in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Study Based on Pharmacokinetic Measurements in Blood Plasma.
Andersen, AM; Bergan, S; Fagerland, MW; Husebye, E; Kristiansen, O; Munkhaugen, J; Vethe, NT, 2022
)
1.34
" Further studies using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling are required to investigate the drug-drug interactions between these drugs."( Simvastatin, but Not Atorvastatin, Is Associated with Higher Peak Rivaroxaban Serum Levels and Bleeding: an Asian Cohort Study from Singapore.
Chan, ECY; Soh, XQ; Tan, DS, 2023
)
2.35
"Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models have an important role in drug discovery/development and decision making in regulatory submissions."( Does the choice of applied physiologically-based pharmacokinetics platform matter? A case study on simvastatin disposition and drug-drug interaction.
Ahlström, C; Lennernäs, H; Lundahl, A; Prieto Garcia, L; Sjögren, E; Vildhede, A, 2022
)
0.94

Compound-Compound Interactions

The aim of this study is to observe and analyze the clinical efficacy of simvastatin combined with exercise training in the treatment of stationary chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated with metabolic syndrome. Rhabdomyolysis was most likely induced by toxic plasma concentrations of SimVastatin due to Pal.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Nineteen adult patients with type III hyperlipoproteinemia (HLP) and homozygosity for apolipoprotein (apo) E2 were treated with the 3-hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitor simvastatin (20 or 40 mg per day) alone or in combination with the fibrate derivative gemfibrozil (450 mg per day) during a 30-week outpatient study."( The influence of simvastatin alone or in combination with gemfibrozil on plasma lipids and lipoproteins in patients with type III hyperlipoproteinemia.
Eichinger, M; Feussner, G; Ziegler, R, 1992
)
0.81
"We have studied the effect of simvastatin, an inhibitor of the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis, alone and in combination with cholestyramine in 48 patients."( [HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in familial hypercholesterolemia. Therapy with simvastatin alone and in combination with cholestyramine in low dosage; a report of 2 years experiences].
Burrichter, H; Geisel, J; Oette, K, 1990
)
0.8
" The use of Simvastatin in combination with HELP significantly augments the reduction in LDL cholesterol to a level where regression of atherosclerotic lesions might be expected."( Long-term clinical experience with HELP-LDL-apheresis in combination with HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors for maximum treatment of coronary heart disease associated with severe hypercholesterolemia.
Armstrong, VW; Eisenhauer, T; Scheler, F; Schuff-Werner, P; Schütz, E; Seidel, D; Thiery, J,
)
0.51
"Recent trials have investigated the usefulness of fenofibrate, alone and in combination with other lipid-lowering therapies, in the treatment of hyperlipidemia."( Review of clinical studies of fenofibrate in combination with currently approved lipid-lowering drugs.
Brown, WV, 1989
)
0.28
" Judging from these results, SV was considered to interact with CT by the following procedure: SV underwent hydrolysis to SVH in aqueous solution, then CT activated the hydrolysis by binding the formed SVH, resulting in a significant reduction in concentration of SV."( Drug interaction between simvastatin and cholestyramine in vitro and in vivo.
Ichikawa, M; Matsuyama, K; Nakai, A; Nishikata, M, 1996
)
0.6
" Hormone replacement therapy combined with simvastatin is well tolerated and extremely effective, as the two therapies seem to be additive."( The effect of hormone replacement therapy alone and in combination with simvastatin on plasma lipids of hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease.
Kyriakides, ZS; Sbarouni, E, 1998
)
0.8
"To evaluate the effects of simvastatin only or combined with continuous hormone replacement therapy on the serum lipid profile in hypercholesterolaemic post-menopausal women."( Effects of simvastatin only or in combination with continuous combined hormone replacement therapy on serum lipid levels in hypercholesterolaemic post-menopausal women.
Atagündüz, P; Caymaz, O; Erenus, M; Fak, AS; Oktay, A; Oktay, S; Tezcan, H, 2000
)
0.99
"The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of transdermal sequential combined hormone replacement therapy alone or combined with simvastatin on the serum lipid profile in hypercholesterolaemic post-menopausal women."( [Serum lipid levels in hypercholesterolemic post-menopausal women treated with transdermal sequential combined hormone replacement therapy only or in combination with simvastatin].
Dobrzycka, B; Dobrzycki, S; Kulikowski, M; Lenczewski, A; Mirończuk, J; Nowak, A; Terlikowski, S, 2000
)
0.71
" A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model was used to predict the maximum in vivo drug-drug interaction."( Inhibition of in vitro metabolism of simvastatin by itraconazole in humans and prediction of in vivo drug-drug interactions.
Ikeda, T; Inoue, S; Ishigam, M; Ito, K; Iwabuchi, H; Komai, T; Kondo, T; Sugiyama, Y; Takasaki, W; Uchiyama, M, 2001
)
0.58
" Therefore, we examined the effect of an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (simvastatin) alone and in combination with cytosine arabinoside (ARA-C) on the proliferation of two AML cell lines."( Effect of simvastatin alone and in combination with cytosine arabinoside on the proliferation of myeloid leukemia cell lines.
Bar-Sef, A; Elis, A; Fabian, I; Lishner, M, 2001
)
0.95
"The objective of our study was to evaluate in humans the drug-drug interaction occurring during the concomitant administration of cisapride and simvastatin, two well-known substrates of CYP3A4."( Study of the drug-drug interaction between simvastatin and cisapride in man.
Guilbaud, R; Masseé, R; O'Hara, GE; Prévost, J; Simard, C; Turgeon, J, 2001
)
0.77
"The objectives of this review are to discuss the role of cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isoforms in drug metabolism, to explain differences in metabolism among the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (HMGs, statins), to review drug-drug and drug-food interaction studies dealing with the HMGs, to present case reports dealing with HMG-related myopathy, to discuss major clinical implications of these case reports and to express an opinion of use of HMGs in clinical practice."( The role of cytochrome P450-mediated drug-drug interactions in determining the safety of statins.
Bottorff, M; Worz, CR, 2001
)
0.31
" Therefore, we determined the effect of SCH 48461 and ezetimibe in combination with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors in chow-fed dogs."( The synergistic hypocholesterolemic activity of the potent cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, in combination with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitors in dogs.
Alton, KB; Burrier, RE; Davis, HR; Pula, KK; Watkins, RW, 2001
)
0.31
"The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe administered with simvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia."( Ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.
Bettis, R; Davidson, MH; LeBeaut, AP; Lipka, LJ; McGarry, T; Melani, L; Sun, S; Suresh, R; Veltri, EP, 2002
)
0.82
"To evaluate the effects of simvastatin only or combined with continuous transdermal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on the serum lipid profile in hypercholesterolaemic women."( [Effects of simvastatin only or in combination with continuous combined hormone replacement therapy on lipid levels in hypercholesterolemic women].
Dobrzycka, B; Dobrzycki, S; Kulikowski, M; Lenczewski, A; Terlikowski, S, 2003
)
0.99
" Rhabdomyolysis can occur with all statins when used alone and particularly when combined with other drugs that are themselves myotoxic or that elevate the concentration of the statin."( Potential drug interaction between simvastatin and danazol causing rhabdomyolysis.
Andreou, ER; Ledger, S, 2003
)
0.6
" Pravastatin does not appear to interact with warfarin but has caused an increased INR when combined with the anticoagulant fluindione."( Oral anticoagulant drug interactions with statins: case report of fluvastatin and review of the literature.
Andrus, MR, 2004
)
0.32
" A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial was conducted with 50 hypercholesterolemic patients with simvastatin and either placebo or ramipril (study I) and in 45 hypercholesterolemic diabetic patients with simvastatin or ramipril with placebo or simvastatin combined with ramipril (study II) for 2 months with 2 months washout."( Simvastatin combined with ramipril treatment in hypercholesterolemic patients.
Ahn, JY; Chung, WJ; Han, SH; Jin, DK; Kang, WC; Kim, DS; Kim, HS; Koh, KK; Seo, YH; Shin, EK; Son, JW, 2004
)
1.97
"To evaluate the effects of simvastatin combined with omega-3 fatty acids on high sensitive C-reactive protein (HsCRP), lipidemia, and fibrinolysis in coronary heart disease (CHD) and CHD risk equivalent patients with mixed dyslipidemia."( Effects of simvastain combined with omega-3 fatty acids on high sensitive C-reactive protein, lipidemia, and fibrinolysis in patients with mixed dyslipidemia.
Cui, L; Guo, WJ; Hong, H; Mao, YL; Pang, BS; Wei, Y; Xu, ZM; Yang, XC, 2004
)
0.62
" Following with the treatment of patients whose low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-ch) reaching goal level (< 100 mg/dL) or close to the goal (< 130 mg/dL), while triglyceride (TG) > or = 200 mg/dL and < 500 mg/dL, was combined with omega-3 fatty acids (3 g/d) or a placebo for 2 months."( Effects of simvastain combined with omega-3 fatty acids on high sensitive C-reactive protein, lipidemia, and fibrinolysis in patients with mixed dyslipidemia.
Cui, L; Guo, WJ; Hong, H; Mao, YL; Pang, BS; Wei, Y; Xu, ZM; Yang, XC, 2004
)
0.32
" Simvastatin alone or combined with ramipril significantly changed lipoproteins, and improved the percent flow-mediated dilator response to hyperemia relative to baseline measurements by 33 +/- 6% and by 50 +/- 14%, respectively (both P <0."( Vascular effects of simvastatin combined with ramipril in hypercholesterolemic patients with coronary artery disease, compared with simvastatin alone: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.
Ahn, JY; Chung, WJ; Han, SH; Jin, DK; Kim, DS; Kim, HS; Koh, KK; Park, GS; Shin, EK; Son, JW, 2004
)
1.56
"Simvastatin combined with losartan improves endothelial function and reduces inflammatory markers to a greater extent than monotherapy with either drug in hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients."( Additive beneficial effects of losartan combined with simvastatin in the treatment of hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients.
Ahn, JY; Ahn, TH; Choi, IS; Chung, WJ; Han, SH; Kang, MH; Koh, KK; Quon, MJ; Seo, YH; Shin, EK, 2004
)
2.01
" The aims of the present study were to investigate, in the New Zealand genetically hypertensive (GH) rat model, the effects of treatment with simvastatin, alone or in combination with valsartan or enalapril, on blood pressure (BP) and structural remodelling of mesenteric resistance arteries (MRA) and of the basilar artery, an artery that plays a major role in the regulation of cerebral resistance."( Effect of simvastatin given alone and in combination with valsartan or enalapril on blood pressure and the structure of mesenteric resistance arteries and the basilar artery in the genetically hypertensive rat model.
Laverty, R; Ledingham, JM,
)
0.73
" Since DDIs are associated with adverse reactions, we performed a cross-sectional study to assess the prevalence of potentially critical drug-drug and drug-statin interactions in an outpatient adult population with dyslipidaemia."( Prevalence of potentially severe drug-drug interactions in ambulatory patients with dyslipidaemia receiving HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy.
Hess, L; Krähenbühl, S; Krähenbühl-Melcher, A; Rätz Bravo, AE; Schlienger, RG; Tchambaz, L, 2005
)
0.33
"An inappropriate drug combination was found in approximately 2% of the person-years of data, and persons who experienced an inappropriate drug combination had higher claims costs."( Inappropriate drug combinations among privately insured patients with HIV disease.
Encinosa, WE; Hellinger, FJ, 2005
)
0.33
"To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Taizhi'an (TZA) capsule combined with Simvastatin (Sim) in treating hyperlipidemia in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients."( Effect of Taizhi'an capsule combined with Simvastatin on hyperlipidemia in diabetic patients.
Gao, F; Hu, XF, 2006
)
0.82
" In combination with dexamethasone and doxorubicin, statins have a chemo-sensitizing effect."( Dose-finding study of high-dose simvastatin combined with standard chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma or lymphoma.
Bloem, AC; Bogers, LH; de Weerdt, O; Kramer, MH; Lokhorst, HM; van de Donk, NW; van der Griend, R; van der Spek, E; Wittebol, S, 2006
)
0.62
"An 84-year-old man was admitted to the hospital for severe rhabdomyolysis induced by drug-drug interactions between simvastatin and ketoconazole and he recovered completely."( A lesson for everyone in drug-drug interactions.
Akram, K; Parker, M; Rao, S, 2007
)
0.55
"Hepatic uptake carriers of the organic anion-transporting peptide (OATP) family of solute carriers are more and more recognized as being involved in hepatic elimination of many drugs and potentially associated drug-drug interactions."( Substrate-dependent drug-drug interactions between gemfibrozil, fluvastatin and other organic anion-transporting peptide (OATP) substrates on OATP1B1, OATP2B1, and OATP1B3.
Brun, ME; Funk, C; Noé, J; Portmann, R, 2007
)
0.34
"001) or in combination with L-arginine (9."( Asymmetric dimethylarginine determines the improvement of endothelium-dependent vasodilation by simvastatin: Effect of combination with oral L-arginine.
Benndorf, RA; Bierend, A; Böger, GI; Böger, RH; Dumbadze, E; Maas, R; Rudolph, TK; Schwedhelm, E, 2007
)
0.56
" At present a drug combination comprising ezetimibe 10 mg and simvastatin in all doses (10, 20, 40 and 80 mg) is being introduced into our market under the company name Inegy."( [Dual inhibition of cholesterol using the drug combination ezetimibe/simvastatin?].
Vaverková, H, 2007
)
0.81
" The frequency of drug-drug interactions involving lovastatin or simvastatin was studied."( Frequency and clinical relevance of drug interactions with lovastatin and simvastatin: an observational database study.
Huupponen, R; Irjala, K; Klaukka, T; Laine, K; Ryynänen, A; Tirkkonen, T; Vahlberg, T, 2008
)
0.81
" We established whether ezetimibe combined with simvastatin differently influences post fat load lipid levels and lipoprotein composition as compared to simvastatin 80mg monotherapy in obese male metabolic syndrome patients."( The effect of statin alone or in combination with ezetimibe on postprandial lipoprotein composition in obese metabolic syndrome patients.
Dallinga-Thie, GM; Hajer, GR; van Vark-van der Zee, LC; Visseren, FL, 2009
)
0.61
" A comprehensive, controlled clinical trial programme was thus designed to evaluate three separate statins in combination with ABT-335, a new formulation of fenofibric acid."( Evaluation of a new formulation of fenofibric acid, ABT-335, co-administered with statins : study design and rationale of a phase III clinical programme.
Bays, HE; Buttler, SM; Davidson, MH; Jones, PH; Kelly, MT; Setze, CM; Sleep, DJ; Stolzenbach, JC, 2008
)
0.35
"We investigated the role of Valsartan (V) alone or in combination with Simvastatin (S) on coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling, and tested the hypothesis that V or V/S attenuate the pro-inflammatory effect of low endothelial shear stress (ESS)."( Attenuation of inflammation and expansive remodeling by Valsartan alone or in combination with Simvastatin in high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques.
Baker, AB; Beigel, R; Chatzizisis, YS; Coskun, AU; Daley, W; Edelman, ER; Feldman, CL; Gerrity, RG; Jonas, M; Maynard, C; Stone, BV; Stone, PH, 2009
)
0.8
"5 mg) combined with alpha-TCP particles or left empty."( Effects of the combination with alpha-tricalcium phosphate and simvastatin on bone regeneration.
Kasugai, S; Kihara, H; Machida, T; Nyan, M; Ohya, K; Sato, D, 2009
)
0.59
" Effects on TAG were also present in combination with statin treatment, illustrating an additional benefit of stanol esters in this CHD risk population."( A plant stanol yogurt drink alone or combined with a low-dose statin lowers serum triacylglycerol and non-HDL cholesterol in metabolic syndrome patients.
Brufau, G; Dallinga-Thie, GM; Dasselaar, M; Mensink, RP; Plat, J, 2009
)
0.35
"We have previously reported that healing of rat calvarial defects was enhanced by application of alpha tricalcium phosphate (alphaTCP) combined with simvastatin, a cholesterol synthesis inhibitor."( Molecular and tissue responses in the healing of rat calvarial defects after local application of simvastatin combined with alpha tricalcium phosphate.
Hao, J; Kasugai, S; Kuroda, S; Miyahara, T; Noritake, K; Nyan, M; Rodriguez, R, 2010
)
0.78
"We evaluated the bioavailability of each ingredient of the Polycap and determined any drug-drug interactions relative to single component reference preparations."( Preservation of bioavailability of ingredients and lack of drug-drug interactions in a novel five-ingredient polypill (polycap): a five-arm phase I crossover trial in healthy volunteers.
Chakraborty, BS; Desai, J; Ghosh, C; Jha, V; Khamar, B; Patel, A; Shah, G; Shah, T, 2010
)
0.36
"Comparative bioavailability was computed and no drug-drug interactions and no difference in comparative bioavailability were concluded for each ingredient based on point estimates of the T/R ratio of the geometric means falling within 80-125% for peak plasma concentration (C(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC(t)), and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC(infinity))."( Preservation of bioavailability of ingredients and lack of drug-drug interactions in a novel five-ingredient polypill (polycap): a five-arm phase I crossover trial in healthy volunteers.
Chakraborty, BS; Desai, J; Ghosh, C; Jha, V; Khamar, B; Patel, A; Shah, G; Shah, T, 2010
)
0.36
" The present study in healthy volunteers establishes that Polycap is safe (no serious adverse events) and well tolerated, and that there is no indication of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions for any of the ingredients, with their bioavailabilities being well preserved."( Preservation of bioavailability of ingredients and lack of drug-drug interactions in a novel five-ingredient polypill (polycap): a five-arm phase I crossover trial in healthy volunteers.
Chakraborty, BS; Desai, J; Ghosh, C; Jha, V; Khamar, B; Patel, A; Shah, G; Shah, T, 2010
)
0.36
" It is in clinical development for the prevention of cardiovascular events and will likely be used in combination with standard of care, including statins."( Coadministration of dalcetrapib with pravastatin, rosuvastatin, or simvastatin: no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions.
Abt, M; Bech, N; Derks, M; Meneses-Lorente, G; Parr, G; Phelan, M; Turnbull, L; White, AM, 2010
)
0.6
" This effect was offset when simvastatin was combined with ezetimibe (LDL-IVB +14."( Ezetimibe alone or in combination with simvastatin increases small dense low-density lipoproteins in healthy men: a randomized trial.
Berneis, K; Berthold, HK; Gouni-Berthold, I; Krone, W; Rizzo, M; Spinas, GA, 2010
)
0.92
"To investigate the protective effects of simvastatin (Sim) combined with nifedipine (Nif) on endothelial cells and elucidate the action mechanism."( Simvastatin combined with nifedipine enhances endothelial cell protection by inhibiting ROS generation and activating Akt phosphorylation.
Chen, XN; Fan, M; Feng, Z; Han, JY; Xu, J; Yang, Z, 2010
)
2.07
" Results indicated it was possible to prepare high-dose sustained-release NA pellets combined with little-dose immediate release SIM by spraying double EC polymer and SIM milled suspension on NA pellets in a bottom-spray fluidized bed coater, respectively."( Preparation and evaluation of nicotinic acid sustained-release pellets combined with immediate release simvastatin.
Guan, T; Hong, M; Li, G; Tang, X; Tao, X; Zhang, L; Zhao, X, 2010
)
0.58
" Food and Drug Administration draft drug interaction guidance as CYP3A4 inducers for clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies."( Simulation of clinical drug-drug interactions from hepatocyte CYP3A4 induction data and its potential utility in trial designs.
Hayashi, M; Shou, M; Skiles, GL; Xu, Y; Zhou, Y, 2011
)
0.37
"We compared the effect of simvastatin versus simvastatin combined with ezetimibe on hemostasis and inflammation after acute coronary events [acute coronary syndromes (ACS)]."( Ezetimibe combined with simvastatin compared with simvastatin alone results in a greater suppression of oxidative stress and enhanced fibrinolysis in patients after acute coronary events.
Machnik, A; Potaczek, DP; Tracz, W; Undas, A; Wypasek, E; Zmudka, K, 2011
)
0.98
"The purpose of this study is to evaluate the osteoconductivity of three different bone substitute materials: α-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP), (β-TCP), and hydroxyapatite (HA), combined with or without simvastatin, which is a cholesterol synthesis inhibitor stimulating BMP-2 expression in osteoblasts."( Evaluation of the osteoconductivity of α-tricalcium phosphate, β-tricalcium phosphate, and hydroxyapatite combined with or without simvastatin in rat calvarial defect.
Kasugai, S; Nyan, M; Ohya, K; Rojbani, H, 2011
)
0.76
" The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of losartan or amlodipine alone or combined with simvastatin on hepatic steatosis degree, and on insulin sensitivity in normocholesterolemic, hypertensive patients with nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis."( Effects of losartan and amlodipine alone or combined with simvastatin in hypertensive patients with nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis.
Derosa, G; Fogari, R; Lazzari, P; Maffioli, P; Mugellini, A; Zoppi, A, 2012
)
0.84
"The incidence of paradoxical HDL-C reductions was low in mixed dyslipidemic patients receiving FENO alone or combined with EZE or EZE/SIMVA."( Low incidence of paradoxical reductions in HDL-C levels in dyslipidemic patients treated with fenofibrate alone or in combination with ezetimibe or ezetimibe/simvastatin.
Brudi, P; Dong, Q; Farnier, M; Johnson-Levonas, AO; Shah, A, 2011
)
0.57
" Few studies have documented the efficacy and safety of CETP inhibitors in combination with commonly used statins."( Effects of the CETP inhibitor evacetrapib administered as monotherapy or in combination with statins on HDL and LDL cholesterol: a randomized controlled trial.
Brewer, HB; Hu, B; Kastelein, JJ; Krueger, KA; McErlean, E; Nicholls, SJ; Nissen, SE; Shao, M; Wang, MD, 2011
)
0.37
"To examine the biochemical effects, safety, and tolerability of evacetrapib, as monotherapy and in combination with statins, in patients with dyslipidemia."( Effects of the CETP inhibitor evacetrapib administered as monotherapy or in combination with statins on HDL and LDL cholesterol: a randomized controlled trial.
Brewer, HB; Hu, B; Kastelein, JJ; Krueger, KA; McErlean, E; Nicholls, SJ; Nissen, SE; Shao, M; Wang, MD, 2011
)
0.37
" In combination with statin therapy, evacetrapib, 100 mg/d, produced increases in HDL-C of 42."( Effects of the CETP inhibitor evacetrapib administered as monotherapy or in combination with statins on HDL and LDL cholesterol: a randomized controlled trial.
Brewer, HB; Hu, B; Kastelein, JJ; Krueger, KA; McErlean, E; Nicholls, SJ; Nissen, SE; Shao, M; Wang, MD, 2011
)
0.37
"Compared with placebo or statin monotherapy, evacetrapib as monotherapy or in combination with statins increased HDL-C levels and decreased LDL-C levels."( Effects of the CETP inhibitor evacetrapib administered as monotherapy or in combination with statins on HDL and LDL cholesterol: a randomized controlled trial.
Brewer, HB; Hu, B; Kastelein, JJ; Krueger, KA; McErlean, E; Nicholls, SJ; Nissen, SE; Shao, M; Wang, MD, 2011
)
0.37
" Our aims were to prospectively assess the antiviral efficacy and safety of this drug combination in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients."( Open-label phase 1b pilot study to assess the antiviral efficacy of simvastatin combined with sertraline in chronic hepatitis C patients.
Altmeyer, R; Cheng, CW; Chopra, N; Lawitz, E; Lim, SG; McHutchison, JG; Patel, K; Randle, JC; Tillmann, HL, 2011
)
0.6
" Mean plasma concentration-time profiles for atazanavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC), darunavir (DRV, administered with ritonavir [RTV]), and drospirenone/ethinylestradiol were similar following co-administration of GSK2248761."( Drug interaction profile for GSK2248761, a next generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor.
de Serres, M; Gould, E; Johnson, M; Kim, J; Lou, Y; Mayers, D; Pietropaolo, K; Piscitelli, S; White, S; Zhou, XJ, 2012
)
0.38
"The hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) influence the pharmacokinetics of several drug classes and are involved in many clinical drug-drug interactions."( Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
Artursson, P; Haglund, U; Karlgren, M; Kimoto, E; Lai, Y; Norinder, U; Vildhede, A; Wisniewski, JR, 2012
)
0.38
" We investigated the effect of simvastatin monotherapy or its combination with ezetimibe on TLR2 and TLR4 membrane expression and on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) production in peripheral blood monocytes of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia."( Effect of simvastatin or its combination with ezetimibe on Toll-like receptor expression and lipopolysaccharide - induced cytokine production in monocytes of hypercholesterolemic patients.
Elisaf, MS; Liberopoulos, EN; Milionis, HJ; Moutzouri, E; Rousouli, K; Tellis, CC; Tselepis, AD, 2012
)
1.07
" This study aimed to investigate the effects of simvastatin locally applied from calcium sulfate (CS) combined with a mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) sheet on fracture healing."( Mesenchymal stem cell sheet transplantation combined with locally released simvastatin enhances bone formation in a rat tibia osteotomy model.
Qi, Y; Shi, Z; Wang, J; Xu, K; Yan, W; Zhao, T, 2013
)
0.88
" This investigation assessed risk for myopathy in patients receiving treatment with a statin in combination with daptomycin, a medication also associated with muscle injury."( Statins and daptomycin: safety assessment of concurrent use and evaluation of drug interaction liability.
Barber, GR; Barron, MA; Golightly, LK; Page, RL, 2013
)
0.39
" Risk of muscle injury therefore appears to be no greater when a statin is administered with daptomycin than when either medication is used alone."( Statins and daptomycin: safety assessment of concurrent use and evaluation of drug interaction liability.
Barber, GR; Barron, MA; Golightly, LK; Page, RL, 2013
)
0.39
"The administration of simvastatin and EPC transplantation can reduce the severity of LPS-induced ALI in mice, and improvement is moderately enhanced in some respects when EPC transplantation is combined with simvastatin administration."( Repair of lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice by endothelial progenitor cells, alone and in combination with simvastatin.
Jing, H; Li, H; Qiang, Y; Wang, G; Wang, L; Wu, H; Yi, J, 2013
)
0.91
"To evaluate the effects and safety of policosanol combined with simvastatin on serum lipids and sex hormones in male patients with hyperlipidemia."( [Effects of policosanol combined with simvastatin on serum lipids and sex hormones in male patients with hyperlipidemia].
Gong, X; Tang, M; Wu, SZ, 2013
)
0.9
" The application of SOHGA for automated model selection, combined with traditional model selection strategies, appears to save time for model development, which also can generate new hypotheses that are biologically more plausible."( Genetic algorithm guided population pharmacokinetic model development for simvastatin, concurrently or non-concurrently co-administered with amlodipine.
Chaturvedula, A; Lee, H; Sale, ME, 2014
)
0.63
"Fumonisin B1 (FB1) is a Fusarium mycotoxin frequently occurring in corn in combination with deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone."( Effects of fumonisin B1 alone and combined with deoxynivalenol or zearalenone on porcine granulosa cell proliferation and steroid production.
Caloni, F; Cortinovis, C; Schreiber, NB; Spicer, LJ, 2014
)
0.4
"A dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method based on solidification of floating organic drop combined with HPLC was developed for the determination of lovastatin and simvastatin in rat urine for the first time."( A dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method based on the solidification of a floating organic drop combined with HPLC for the determination of lovastatin and simvastatin in rat urine.
Hou, X; Li, F; Ma, X; Wang, L; Zhao, L; Zhao, P, 2014
)
0.79
" This purpose of this study was to determine whether simvastatin combined with an antioxidant could produce the same effect or greater and to examine affected surrogate biomarkers for the neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury in rat."( Simvastatin combined with antioxidant attenuates the cerebral vascular endothelial inflammatory response in a rat traumatic brain injury.
Chen, HJ; Cho, CL; Liang, CL; Liliang, PC; Lu, K; Tsai, YD; Wang, HK; Wang, KW, 2014
)
2.09
"Almost 50% of serious adverse events with statin therapy are attributed to unfavorable drug-drug combinations."( Avoiding patient morbidity: Updated statin drug interactions and risks for patient harm.
Campbell, JD; Finks, SW, 2014
)
0.4
" We aimed to develop a mathematical model describing a drug-drug interaction between simvastatin and clarithromycin in humans."( A pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction model of simvastatin and clarithromycin in humans.
Chaiwong, K; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J; Pongpanich, K; Sonsingh, P, 2014
)
0.88
"The drug-drug interaction between simvastatin and clarithromycin was modeled simultaneously with a parent-metabolite model for clarithromycin and a one-compartment model for simvastatin linked to its active form, simvastatin hydroxy acid."( A pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction model of simvastatin and clarithromycin in humans.
Chaiwong, K; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J; Pongpanich, K; Sonsingh, P, 2014
)
0.94
" Therefore, we aimed to develop a mathematical model describing drug-drug interaction between simvastatin and verapamil in humans."( A pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction model of simvastatin and verapamil in humans.
Chamnansua, M; Kaewdang, N; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J, 2014
)
0.88
"The drug-drug interaction between simvastatin and verapamil was modeled simultaneously with a two compartment model for verapamil with its active metabolite, norverapamil and a one compartment model for simvastatin with its active form, simvastatin hydroxy acid."( A pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction model of simvastatin and verapamil in humans.
Chamnansua, M; Kaewdang, N; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J, 2014
)
0.94
"Forty rabbits were randomly divided into five groups of eight: normal control, hyperlipidemia model, pioglitazone, simvastatin, and pioglitazone combined with simvastatin therapy."( Effect of pioglitazone combined with simvastatin on the CD40-CD40 ligand system in rabbits with atherosclerosis.
Bao, XC; Gao, XQ; Ji, XP; Li, HW; Qiu, YH; Wu, Z; Xue, L; Yang, XF; Zhu, XH, 2015
)
0.9
" Accordingly, potential drug-drug interactions associated with the concomitant use of these agents present an area of concern."( Carboxylesterase 1-mediated drug-drug interactions between clopidogrel and simvastatin.
Markowitz, JS; Wang, X; Zhu, HJ, 2015
)
0.65
"Simvastatin given in combination with aspirin delayed the development of pathological changes in the myocardium, reduced vascular damage and prolonged the survival time of cardiac allograft."( Simvastatin combined with aspirin increases the survival time of heart allograft by activating CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells and enhancing vascular endothelial cell protection.
Gao, B; Zhu, J,
)
3.02
" Fifty-one in each group were given placebo, ezetimibe 10mg combined with simvastatin 10mg (Vyto10), ezetimibe 10mg combined with simvastatin 20mg (Vyto20), or simvastatin 20mg alone (Simva20) daily for 2months."( Vascular and metabolic effects of ezetimibe combined with simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Han, SH; Hayashi, T; Kim, EY; Koh, KK; Lee, Y; Oh, PC; Park, YM; Sakuma, I; Shin, EK, 2015
)
0.89
" CETP inhibitors are likely to be utilized as 'add-on' therapy to statins in patients receiving concomitant medications, so the potential for evacetrapib to cause clinically important drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with cytochromes P450 (CYP) was evaluated."( CYP-mediated drug-drug interactions with evacetrapib, an investigational CETP inhibitor: in vitro prediction and clinical outcome.
Cannady, EA; Friedrich, S; Krueger, KA; Nicholls, SJ; Rehmel, JR; Suico, JG; Wang, MD, 2015
)
0.42
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of perindopril or barnidipine alone or combined with simvastatin on metabolic parameters and hepatic steatosis degree."( Perindopril and barnidipine alone or combined with simvastatin on hepatic steatosis and inflammatory parameters in hypertensive patients.
D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Maffioli, P; Mugellini, A; Pesce, RM, 2015
)
0.88
" The proposed method was applied to the drug-drug pharmacokinetic interaction study of SV combined with BBR after oral administration in rats."( Validated UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of simvastatin, simvastatin hydroxy acid and berberine in rat plasma: Application to the drug-drug pharmacokinetic interaction study of simvastatin combined with berberine after oral administratio
Li, G; Liu, M; Su, X; Zhao, G; Zhao, L, 2015
)
0.66
" Because of interaction between amlodipine and simvastatin, in combination with physical activity, the patient reported: muscle pain, weakness of the muscles, dizziness, and confusion."( [Drug interaction in 63-year-old male sportsman--a case report].
Foerster, J; Schetz, D; Sein Anand, J, 2015
)
0.67
" Materials and methods In the present study, we investigated whether SV combined with BGM mediates its effect through suppression of NF-κB-signalling pathway."( Simvastatin in combination with bergamottin potentiates TNF-induced apoptosis through modulation of NF-κB signalling pathway in human chronic myelogenous leukaemia.
Ahn, KS; Kim, SM; Lee, EJ; Lee, JH; Lee, SG; Nam, D; Shim, BS; Um, JY; Yang, WM, 2016
)
1.88
" In this clinical study, 26 healthy subjects received simvastatin 40 mg alone or in combination with LCZ696 or after 1 or 2 h of LCZ696 dosing."( In vitro and clinical evaluation of OATP-mediated drug interaction potential of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696).
Alexander, N; Ayalasomayajula, S; Goswami, B; Han, Y; Hanna, I; Hinder, M; Langenickel, T; Malcolm, K; Natrillo, A; Sunkara, G; Zhou, W, 2016
)
0.68
" 20 patients (32 hips) underwent multiple drilling combined with simvastatin treatment (SIM group); 16 patients (26 hips) underwent multiple drilling alone (MD group)."( Multiple drilling combined with simvastatin versus multiple drilling alone for the treatment of avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head: 3-year follow-up study.
Wang, D; Yin, H; Yuan, Z, 2016
)
0.96
" Muscle biopsy was compatible with statin-associated rhabdomyolysis, probably caused by a drug-drug interaction between simvastatin and itraconazole."( Statin-associated rhabdomyolysis triggered by drug-drug interaction with itraconazole.
Damkier, P; Dybro, AM; Hellfritzsch, M; Rasmussen, TB, 2016
)
0.64
"To evaluate in healthy volunteers the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of GSK2647544, (a selective lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) inhibitor)."( Evaluation of the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and drug-drug interaction potential of a selective Lp-PLA2 inhibitor (GSK2647544) in healthy volunteers
.
Fong, R; Gray, F; Guiney, W; Lockhart, A; Wu, K; Xu, J; Xu, Y; Yao, X, 2016
)
0.43
" The purpose of this study is to elucidate the role of hyperlipidaemia alone or in combination with acidosis/alkalosis in the development and potentiation of statin-induced myotoxicity."( Hyperlipidaemia alone and in combination with acidosis can increase the incidence and severity of statin-induced myotoxicity.
Barrett, DA; Bruce, KD; de Moor, CH; Eckel, RH; Gershkovich, P; Lee, JB; Sungelo, M; Taha, DA; Zgair, A, 2017
)
0.46
" The study compared the effect of physical exercise on the changes of serum potassium in hypertensive patients receiving ACEI alone or in combination with statin."( Short-term changes of serum potassium concentration induced by physical exercise in patient with arterial hypertension treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor alone or in combination with statin.
Deska, P; Nowicki, M, 2017
)
0.46
" The aim of this study was to establish a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) parent-metabolite model of zoptarelin doxorubicin and to apply it for drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential analysis."( A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) parent-metabolite model of the chemotherapeutic zoptarelin doxorubicin-integration of in vitro results, Phase I and Phase II data and model application for drug-drug interaction potential analysis.
Aicher, B; Ammer, N; Britz, H; Hanke, N; Lehr, T; Moj, D; Sindermann, H; Teifel, M; Wojtyniak, JG, 2018
)
0.48
" A combination of in vitro data, clinical pharmacokinetic data, and drug-drug interaction (DDI) data of osimertinib in oncology patients were used to develop the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and verify the DDI data of osimertinib."( Development, Verification, and Prediction of Osimertinib Drug-Drug Interactions Using PBPK Modeling Approach to Inform Drug Label.
Ballard, P; Pilla Reddy, V; Sharma, P; Vishwanathan, K; Walker, M, 2018
)
0.48
" The aim of the present study was to investigate the roles and mechanisms of low‑frequency ultrasound (LFU) and microbubbles combined with simvastatin on MCF‑7 cell growth and apoptosis."( Low‑frequency ultrasound and microbubbles combined with simvastatin promote the apoptosis of MCF‑7 cells by affecting the LATS1/YAP/RHAMM pathway.
Chen, C; Li, H; Wang, D, 2018
)
0.93
" Due to drug-drug interactions caused by the inhibition or induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes, changes in drug metabolism are the major causes of drug toxicity, CYP3A4 is one of the key isozymes, and involved in the metabolism of over 60% of clinical drugs."( The enhancement of cardiotoxicity that results from inhibiton of CYP 3A4 activity and hERG channel by berberine in combination with statins.
Fang, L; Fang, Q; Feng, P; Guo, F; Li, B; Liang, Z; Xu, X; Zhan, G; Zhang, B; Zhao, L, 2018
)
0.48
" We aimed to investigate the differential association of ezetimibe-statin combination with incident MACE by presence of diabetes."( Differential association of ezetimibe-simvastatin combination with major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with or without diabetes: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.
Cha, BS; Hong, N; Kang, ES; Lee, BW; Lee, CJ; Lee, YH; Park, SH, 2018
)
0.75
"A previous attempt to accurately quantify the increased simvastatin acid exposure due to drug-drug interaction (DDI) with coadministered telithromycin, using a mechanistic static model, substantially underpredicted the magnitude of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratio (AUCR) based on reversible inhibition of CYP3A4 and organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1)."( Mechanistic In Vitro Studies Indicate that the Clinical Drug-Drug Interaction between Telithromycin and Simvastatin Acid Is Driven by Time-Dependent Inhibition of CYP3A4 with Minimal Effect on OATP1B1.
Butler, P; Elsby, R; Gill, RU; Hare, V; Neal, H; Outteridge, S; Pearson, C; Plant, K; Riley, RJ, 2019
)
0.97
"Five clinical pharmacology studies evaluated the potential drug-drug interaction between multiple subcutaneous taspoglutide doses and a single dose of lisinopril, warfarin, and simvastatin and multiple doses of digoxin and an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel."( Assessment of Drug-Drug Interactions between Taspoglutide, a Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonist, and Drugs Commonly Used in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results of Five Phase I Trials.
Bogman, K; Brumm, J; Giraudon, M; Hofmann, C; Mangold, B; Niggli, M; Sauter, A; Schmitt, C; Sturm, S; Sturm-Pellanda, C, 2019
)
0.71
"The objective of this study was to fabricate and characterize chitosan combined with different amounts of simvastatin-loaded nanoparticles and to investigate their potential for guided bone regeneration in vitro and in vivo."( In vitro and in vivo evaluation of chitosan scaffolds combined with simvastatin-loaded nanoparticles for guided bone regeneration.
Chen, F; Guan, B; Jin, C; Jin, L; Li, H; Li, Y; Lin, M; Liu, D; Liu, Z; Luo, S; Song, J; Wu, M; Xue, Y; Zhang, X, 2019
)
0.96
"To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of berberine for the treatment of hyperlipidemia, six electronic literature databases including SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang Data, PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library were searched to collect clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of berberine alone or combined with statins for the treatment of hyperlipidemia from the inception to 8 March 2018."( Efficacy and Safety of Berberine Alone or Combined with Statins for the Treatment of Hyperlipidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.
Feng, R; Ji, ZC; Jin, XY; Li, XM; Yang, FW; Zhang, BL; Zhang, JH; Zhang, LS; Zhang, MY; Zhao, MY, 2019
)
0.51
" Rhabdomyolysis was most likely induced by toxic plasma concentrations of Simvastatin due to Palbociclibs inhibition of the CYP3A4 enzyme in combination with a decreased hepatic uptake of Simvastatin due to single nucleotide polymorphism rs4149056."( Palbociclib in combination with simvastatin induce severe rhabdomyolysis: a case report.
Duno, M; Hansen, K; Jeppesen, TD; Krag, T; Nersesjan, V, 2019
)
1.03
" In this study, we investigated the effects of BMSC therapy in combination with simvastatin (SMV) on angiogenesis as well as on the activity of the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway during burn wound healing in rats."( Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Combined With Simvastatin Accelerates Burn Wound Healing by Activation of the Akt/mTOR Pathway.
Mohajer Ansari, J; Nobakht, M; Ramhormozi, P; Simorgh, S, 2020
)
1.03
"The aim of this study is to observe and analyze the clinical efficacy of simvastatin combined with exercise training in the treatment of stationary chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated with metabolic syndrome."( Clinical effect of simvastatin combined with exercise training in the treatment of stationary chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated with metabolic syndrome.
Jiang, N; Liu, J; Liu, T; Luo, W, 2020
)
1.12
"To evaluate the local effect of simvastatin (SVT) combined with deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) with hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate biphasic ceramics (HA/TCP) and with collagen sponge (CS) on bone repair in critical size defects (CSDs) in rat calvaria."( Local effect of simvastatin combined with different osteoconductive biomaterials and collagen sponge on new bone formation in critical defects in rat calvaria.
Carneiro, FP; Duarte, WR; Ferreira, VMM; Oliveira, GJPL; Pinto, LNMP; Roriz, VM; Sousa, DN; Vianna, LMS, 2020
)
1.19
"In the histometric analysis, the use of SVT showed to increase bone formation in the CSDs when combined with all the bone substitutes tested in this study (p<0."( Local effect of simvastatin combined with different osteoconductive biomaterials and collagen sponge on new bone formation in critical defects in rat calvaria.
Carneiro, FP; Duarte, WR; Ferreira, VMM; Oliveira, GJPL; Pinto, LNMP; Roriz, VM; Sousa, DN; Vianna, LMS, 2020
)
0.9
"The use of SVT without the need for a vehicle and combined with a commercially available biomaterial may be a cheaper way to potentiate the formation of bone tissue without the need to produce new biomaterials."( Local effect of simvastatin combined with different osteoconductive biomaterials and collagen sponge on new bone formation in critical defects in rat calvaria.
Carneiro, FP; Duarte, WR; Ferreira, VMM; Oliveira, GJPL; Pinto, LNMP; Roriz, VM; Sousa, DN; Vianna, LMS, 2020
)
0.9
"Self-controlled designs, specifically the case-crossover (CCO) and the self-controlled case series (SCCS), are increasingly utilized to generate real-world evidence (RWE) on drug-drug interactions (DDIs)."( Drug-Drug Interaction Surveillance Study: Comparing Self-Controlled Designs in Five Empirical Examples in Real-World Data.
Bykov, K; Gagne, JJ; Kim, S; Li, H; Lo Re, V; Vine, SM, 2021
)
0.62
" The present study aimed to compare mean LDL cholesterol reduction and its variability achieved with different doses of the three statins most frequently used in monotherapy or combined with ezetimibe in a real clinical setting."( LDL Cholesterol Reduction Variability with Different Types and Doses of Statins in Monotherapy or Combined with Ezetimibe. Results from the Spanish Arteriosclerosis Society Dyslipidaemia Registry.
Bea, AM; Benaiges, D; Blanco-Vaca, F; Brea-Hernando, Á; Climent, E; Pedro-Botet, J; Perea, V; Pintó, X; Plana, N; Suárez-Tembra, M, 2022
)
0.72
" As to combined treatment, the lowest and highest mean percentage LDL cholesterol reductions were obtained with simvastatin 10 mg combined with ezetimibe (50."( LDL Cholesterol Reduction Variability with Different Types and Doses of Statins in Monotherapy or Combined with Ezetimibe. Results from the Spanish Arteriosclerosis Society Dyslipidaemia Registry.
Bea, AM; Benaiges, D; Blanco-Vaca, F; Brea-Hernando, Á; Climent, E; Pedro-Botet, J; Perea, V; Pintó, X; Plana, N; Suárez-Tembra, M, 2022
)
0.93
"In a real clinical setting, rosuvastatin was superior to the other statins in lowering LDL cholesterol, both as monotherapy or combined with ezetimibe."( LDL Cholesterol Reduction Variability with Different Types and Doses of Statins in Monotherapy or Combined with Ezetimibe. Results from the Spanish Arteriosclerosis Society Dyslipidaemia Registry.
Bea, AM; Benaiges, D; Blanco-Vaca, F; Brea-Hernando, Á; Climent, E; Pedro-Botet, J; Perea, V; Pintó, X; Plana, N; Suárez-Tembra, M, 2022
)
0.72
"Several previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the efficacy of metformin combined with simvastatin in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), yet the results of the researches are not consistent."( The efficacy and safety of metformin combined with simvastatin in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Chen, L; Liu, Y; Shao, Y; Xie, J; Zhu, G, 2021
)
1.09
"We searched PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and Chinese biomedical literature databases online to identify the RCTs evaluating the efficacy of metformin combined with simvastatin in the treatment of PCOS."( The efficacy and safety of metformin combined with simvastatin in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Chen, L; Liu, Y; Shao, Y; Xie, J; Zhu, G, 2021
)
1.06
"Metformin combined with simvastatin is superior to metformin alone in the treatment of PCOS patients with more advantages in improving the levels of sex hormones, blood lipids, and blood sugar."( The efficacy and safety of metformin combined with simvastatin in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Chen, L; Liu, Y; Shao, Y; Xie, J; Zhu, G, 2021
)
1.18
" The VEO alone and in combination with D-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS) has significantly increased the MLN and SVN loading."( Vitamin E Oil Incorporated Liposomal Melphalan and Simvastatin: Approach to Obtain Improved Physicochemical Characteristics of Hydrolysable Melphalan and Anticancer Activity in Combination with Simvastatin Against Multiple Myeloma.
Eswara, BRM; Manjappa, AS; Nagadeepthi, N; Sambamoorthy, U; Sanapala, AK, 2021
)
0.87
"This study is aimed at exploring the effects and outcomes of simvastatin combined with resistance training on the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) of peripheral blood lymphocytes and the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of the transcription 3 (JAK/STAT3) signaling pathway in patients with CHF."( Simvastatin Combined with Resistance Training Improves Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure by Modulating Mitochondrial Membrane Potential and the Janus Kinase/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 Signaling Pathways.
Wang, J; Wang, X; Wen, C; Yan, K, 2022
)
2.41
"Simvastatin combined with resistance training improves heart function and reduces myocardial damage as well as the occurrence of adverse cardiac events compared with simvastatin alone."( Simvastatin Combined with Resistance Training Improves Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure by Modulating Mitochondrial Membrane Potential and the Janus Kinase/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 Signaling Pathways.
Wang, J; Wang, X; Wen, C; Yan, K, 2022
)
3.61
" Both platforms predicted equally well the observed simvastatin (lactone and acid) pharmacokinetics (20-80 mg), BCRP and OATP1B1 drug-gene interactions (DGIs), and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) when co-administered with CYP3A4 and OATP1B1 inhibitors/inducers."( Does the choice of applied physiologically-based pharmacokinetics platform matter? A case study on simvastatin disposition and drug-drug interaction.
Ahlström, C; Lennernäs, H; Lundahl, A; Prieto Garcia, L; Sjögren, E; Vildhede, A, 2022
)
1.19
"Methadone and buprenorphine have pharmacologic properties that are concerning for a high risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs)."( Identifying Clinically Relevant Drug-Drug Interactions With Methadone and Buprenorphine: A Translational Approach to Signal Detection.
Acton, EK; Bilker, WB; Brensinger, CM; Dawwas, GK; Hennessy, S; Leonard, CE; Li, L; Miano, TA; Neuman, M; Nguyen, TPP; Soprano, SE; Wang, L; Woody, G; Yu, E, 2022
)
0.72
" After adjusting for sociodemographic and common cardiovascular risk factors, we used multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine aspirin should be combined with which type of statin for better CVD preventive effects."( Cardiovascular disease preventive effects of aspirin combined with different statins in the United States general population.
Huangtao, Z; Li, B; Liu, T; Pan, Y; Sun, L; Wang, B; Wang, J; Wang, S; Zhu, Z; Zuo, R, 2023
)
0.91
" Based on the different effects of statin members, this study aims to evaluate the effect of two of the most promising lipophilic statins, Simvastatin and Pitavastatin, and their combination with a conventional chemotherapeutic regimen of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on breast cancer cells."( Enhanced therapeutic efficacy of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide in combination with pitavastatin or simvastatin against breast cancer cells.
Dewidar, SA; El Gayar, AM; El-Mesery, M; Hamdy, O; Soliman, MM, 2023
)
1.33

Bioavailability

Simvastatin is poorly bioavailable as it is practically insoluble in water and shows dissolution rate-limited absorption. Only 7% of the dose reaches the general circulation intact. Chronic ingestion of high doses of the flavonol quercetin will decrease the bioavailability of simVastatin to a significant extent.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" SV is well absorbed by rats, dogs, and humans."( Metabolic disposition studies on simvastatin, a cholesterol-lowering prodrug.
Chen, IW; Duggan, DE; Duncan, CA; Rosegay, A; Vickers, S,
)
0.41
" The results imply a decreased bioavailability of SLS in the statin-treated group, while no evidence for an altered permeability barrier to water was found."( Effect of systemic treatment with cholesterol-lowering drugs on the skin barrier function in humans.
Agner, E; Agner, T; Malinowski, J; Meibom, J; Ramsing, D, 1995
)
0.29
" Simvastatin is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract but is highly extracted by the liver and only 7% of the dose reaches the general circulation intact."( Clinical pharmacokinetics and practical applications of simvastatin.
Mauro, VF, 1993
)
1.44
" SV undergoes an important first pass metabolism and this is thought to be partly responsible for its low bioavailability after oral administration."( In vitro inhibition of simvastatin metabolism in rat and human liver by naringenin.
Hagenbach, J; Jung, L; Koffel, JC; Ubeaud, G; Vandenschrieck, S, 1999
)
0.61
"The quantitative structure-bioavailability relationship of 232 structurally diverse drugs was studied to evaluate the feasibility of constructing a predictive model for the human oral bioavailability of prospective new medicinal agents."( QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
Topliss, JG; Yoshida, F, 2000
)
0.31
"Atherogenic levels of native low density lipoproteins (nLDLs) decrease the bioavailability of endothelium-derived NO and downregulate endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) expression in cultured human endothelial cells."( 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibition prevents endothelial NO synthase downregulation by atherogenic levels of native LDLs: balance between transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation.
Badimon, L; Martínez-González, J; Raposo, B; Rodríguez, C, 2001
)
0.31
" Lovastatin, Atorvastatin, Pravastatin and Simvastatin demonstrate variable potency to enhance the NO/O2- concentration ratio after stimulation of NOS, resulting in an increase of NO bioavailability in endothelial cells."( Statin-stimulated nitric oxide release from endothelium.
Dobrucki, IT; Dobrucki, LW; Kalinowski, L; Malinski, T,
)
0.39
"3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) can exert beneficial effects independently of serum cholesterol reduction by increasing the bioavailability of nitric oxide."( Simvastatin attenuates oxidant-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in cardiac myocytes.
Akao, M; Jones, SP; Marbán, E; Teshima, Y, 2003
)
1.76
"The main purpose of this work is to prepare self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) for oral bioavailability enhancement of a poorly water soluble drug, simvastatin."( Development of self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS) for oral bioavailability enhancement of simvastatin in beagle dogs.
Cho, SH; Chon, SK; Jeong, SY; Kang, BK; Khang, G; Lee, HB; Lee, JS; Yuk, SH, 2004
)
0.73
" Extended-release niacin, also given once daily, has an absorption rate intermediate between the other formulations and is associated with fewer flushing and gastrointestinal symptoms without increasing hepatotoxic risk."( New perspectives on the use of niacin in the treatment of lipid disorders.
McKenney, J, 2004
)
0.32
" Because food increases the bioavailability of fenofibrate, each dose was administered with food to maximize the exposure of fenofibric acid."( Simvastatin does not have a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction with fenofibrate in humans.
Bergman, AJ; Burke, J; Hartford, A; He, W; Lasseter, KC; Liu, L; Murphy, G; Paolini, JF; Prueksaritanont, T; Qiu, Y; Valesky, R; Vega, JM; Zhao, JJ, 2004
)
1.77
" Dose optimization and use of novel controlled drug delivery systems may help in increasing the bioavailability and distribution of statins to the bone microenvironment."( Statins and osteoporosis: new role for old drugs.
Jadhav, SB; Jain, GK, 2006
)
0.33
" In conclusion, orange juice increases the bioavailability of pravastatin administered orally."( Orange juice increased the bioavailability of pravastatin, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitor, in rats and healthy human subjects.
Kobayashi, S; Koitabashi, Y; Kumai, T; Matsumoto, N; Sekine, S; Watanabe, M; Yanagida, Y, 2006
)
0.33
"Cyclodextrins (CDs) are cyclic oligosaccharides, capable of forming inclusion complexes with hydrophobic molecules in aqueous solution and therefore, of improving the bioavailability of many drugs."( [Interactions in solution between cyclodextrins and statins].
Csempesz, F; Süle, A; Szente, L, 2005
)
0.33
" We studied the actions of simvastatin (SIM) in enhancing NO bioavailability and reducing oxidative stress in coronary vessels from diabetic rats and in rat coronary artery endothelial cells (RCAEC) exposed to high glucose."( Simvastatin improves diabetes-induced coronary endothelial dysfunction.
Caldwell, RB; Caldwell, RW; El-Remessy, AB; Ma, G; Matragoon, S; Tawfik, HE, 2006
)
2.07
" Of particular interest, statins have been shown to increase bioavailability of nitric oxide and protect against vascular inflammation and cardiac cell death in a number of cardiovascular disease states."( Statin therapy and myocardial no-reflow.
Calvert, JW; Lefer, DJ, 2006
)
0.33
" Human oral bioavailability is an important pharmacokinetic property, which is directly related to the amount of drug available in the systemic circulation to exert pharmacological and therapeutic effects."( Hologram QSAR model for the prediction of human oral bioavailability.
Andricopulo, AD; Moda, TL; Montanari, CA, 2007
)
0.34
"Self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS) are useful to improve the bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs by increasing their apparent solubility through solubilization."( Application of mixture experimental design to simvastatin apparent solubility predictions in the microemulsifion formed by self-microemulsifying.
Meng, J; Zheng, L, 2007
)
0.6
"The study was designed to evaluate the effect of delayed release (DR) on absorption and bioavailability of intestinally metabolized drugs after oral dosing, using the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin, a CYP3A substrate, as a model drug."( Pharmacokinetics of the CYP 3A substrate simvastatin following administration of delayed versus immediate release oral dosage forms.
Amidon, GL; Hilfinger, JM; Kijek, P; Kim, JS; Langguth, P; Staubach, P; Tubic-Grozdanis, M, 2008
)
0.8
"Simvastatin bioavailability was increased by a factor of three, as compared to the reference formulation Zocor."( Pharmacokinetics of the CYP 3A substrate simvastatin following administration of delayed versus immediate release oral dosage forms.
Amidon, GL; Hilfinger, JM; Kijek, P; Kim, JS; Langguth, P; Staubach, P; Tubic-Grozdanis, M, 2008
)
2.05
"The interplay between gastrointestinal physiology (lower CYP 3A expression in the distal ileum and the colon) and formulation design (zero-order controlled release after a predetermined lag-time) resulted in successful absorption and bioavailability improvement and represent a viable strategy to reduce the dose of CYP 3A drugs."( Pharmacokinetics of the CYP 3A substrate simvastatin following administration of delayed versus immediate release oral dosage forms.
Amidon, GL; Hilfinger, JM; Kijek, P; Kim, JS; Langguth, P; Staubach, P; Tubic-Grozdanis, M, 2008
)
0.61
"Self-nanoemulsifying granules were formulated with the objective of improving the bioavailability of the ezetimibe and simvastatin when administered together."( Formulation and in vivo evaluation of self-nanoemulsifying granules for oral delivery of a combination of ezetimibe and simvastatin.
Dixit, RP; Nagarsenker, MS, 2008
)
0.76
" Enhancement of aqueous solubility, dissolution rate, and bioavailability of drug is a very challenging task in drug development."( Co-solvent evaporation method for enhancement of solubility and dissolution rate of poorly aqueous soluble drug simvastatin: in vitro-in vivo evaluation.
Gattani, S; Jain, P; Khirwal, L; Pandya, P; Surana, S, 2008
)
0.56
"Melatonin was shown to reduce blood pressure, oxidative load and to increase nitric oxide bioavailability predisposing melatonin to have antiremodelling potential."( Effect of melatonin, captopril, spironolactone and simvastatin on blood pressure and left ventricular remodelling in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Adamcova, M; Bednarova, K; Krajcirovicova, K; Mullerova, M; Paulis, L; Pechanova, O; Pelouch, V; Simko, F, 2009
)
0.6
"Glyceryl monooleate (GMO)/poloxamer 407 cubic nanoparticles were investigated as potential oral drug delivery systems to enhance the bioavailability of the water-insoluble model drug simvastatin."( Glyceryl monooleate/poloxamer 407 cubic nanoparticles as oral drug delivery systems: I. In vitro evaluation and enhanced oral bioavailability of the poorly water-soluble drug simvastatin.
Chen, J; Hu, F; Lai, J; Lu, Y; Sun, J; Wu, W; Yin, Z, 2009
)
0.74
" We conclude that chronic ingestion of high doses of the flavonol quercetin will decrease the bioavailability of simvastatin to a significant extent."( Effects of the flavonol quercetin on the bioavailability of simvastatin in pigs.
Cermak, R; Langguth, P; Wein, S; Wolffram, S, 2009
)
0.81
" Previous results suggest that vascular dysfunction in OZR is associated with chronic reduction in vascular nitric-oxide (NO) bioavailability and chronic inflammation, both frequently associated with hypercholesterolemia."( Impact of chronic anticholesterol therapy on development of microvascular rarefaction in the metabolic syndrome.
Frisbee, JC; Frisbee, SJ; Goodwill, AG; James, ME; Stapleton, PA, 2009
)
0.35
"While the positive impact of chronic statin treatment on vascular outcomes in the metabolic syndrome are independent of changes to total cholesterol, and are more strongly associated with improvements to vascular NO bioavailability and attenuated inflammation, these results provide both a spatial and temporal framework for targeted investigation into mechanistic determinants of vasculopathy in the metabolic syndrome."( Impact of chronic anticholesterol therapy on development of microvascular rarefaction in the metabolic syndrome.
Frisbee, JC; Frisbee, SJ; Goodwill, AG; James, ME; Stapleton, PA, 2009
)
0.35
" Consequently, the absolute bioavailability (A."( Effects of simvastatin on the pharmacokinetics of verapamil and its main metabolite, norverapamil, in rats.
Choi, DH; Choi, JS; Li, C,
)
0.52
"We evaluated the bioavailability of each ingredient of the Polycap and determined any drug-drug interactions relative to single component reference preparations."( Preservation of bioavailability of ingredients and lack of drug-drug interactions in a novel five-ingredient polypill (polycap): a five-arm phase I crossover trial in healthy volunteers.
Chakraborty, BS; Desai, J; Ghosh, C; Jha, V; Khamar, B; Patel, A; Shah, G; Shah, T, 2010
)
0.36
"The bioavailability of the ingredients of the Polycap (T; test) when formulated as a single capsule was compared with that of identical capsules with each of its ingredients administered separately (R; reference) in a five-arm, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-treatment, two-sequence, crossover trial with at least a 2-week washout period in a total of 195 healthy volunteers."( Preservation of bioavailability of ingredients and lack of drug-drug interactions in a novel five-ingredient polypill (polycap): a five-arm phase I crossover trial in healthy volunteers.
Chakraborty, BS; Desai, J; Ghosh, C; Jha, V; Khamar, B; Patel, A; Shah, G; Shah, T, 2010
)
0.36
"Comparative bioavailability was computed and no drug-drug interactions and no difference in comparative bioavailability were concluded for each ingredient based on point estimates of the T/R ratio of the geometric means falling within 80-125% for peak plasma concentration (C(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC(t)), and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC(infinity))."( Preservation of bioavailability of ingredients and lack of drug-drug interactions in a novel five-ingredient polypill (polycap): a five-arm phase I crossover trial in healthy volunteers.
Chakraborty, BS; Desai, J; Ghosh, C; Jha, V; Khamar, B; Patel, A; Shah, G; Shah, T, 2010
)
0.36
"Simvastatin (SV), a cholesterol-lowering agent, has been widely used in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, dyslipidemia and coronary heart disease, but SV shows the low oral bioavailability due to its poor aqueous solubility and extensive metabolism by cytochrome-3A system in intestinal guts and liver."( The characteristics and mechanism of simvastatin loaded lipid nanoparticles to increase oral bioavailability in rats.
Bu, H; Gao, F; Gao, Z; Huang, Y; Li, Y; Zhang, Z, 2010
)
2.08
" Its low dissolution rate leads to a poor absorption, distribution, and target organ delivery because the bioavailability of drugs with low aqueous solubility is limited by their dissolution rates."( Preparation and characterization of solid dispersion of simvastatin.
Arantes, VT; de Oliveira, RB; Resende, JA; Silva, TD; Speziali, NL; Vianna-Soares, CD, 2010
)
0.61
"The preparation of SIM SD with PEG or PVP is a promising strategy to improve the bioavailability of the drug."( Preparation and characterization of solid dispersion of simvastatin.
Arantes, VT; de Oliveira, RB; Resende, JA; Silva, TD; Speziali, NL; Vianna-Soares, CD, 2010
)
0.61
"The purpose of the present investigation was to develop solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) of simvastatin in order to enhance its oral bioavailability by minimizing its first-pass metabolism."( Oral solid compritol 888 ATO nanosuspension of simvastatin: optimization and biodistribution studies.
Chuttani, K; Mishra, AK; Pathak, K; Shah, M, 2011
)
0.85
"Statins can have beneficial cholesterol-independent effects on vascular contractility, which may involve increases in the bioavailability of NO (nitric oxide) as a result of phosphorylation of eNOS (endothelial NO synthase)."( Acute simvastatin increases endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation via AMP-activated protein kinase and reduces contractility of isolated rat mesenteric resistance arteries.
Al-Abri, M; Austin, C; Cobb, C; Rossoni, LV; Wareing, M; Wenceslau, CF, 2011
)
0.85
" Consequently, the absolute bioavailability (F) of losartan after oral administration with simvastatin was significantly increased by 59."( Effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of losartan and its main metabolite EXP-3174 in rats: possible role of CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibition by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
Choi, DH; Choi, JS; Yang, SH, 2011
)
0.59
" In addition to its cholesterol-lowering effect, the ability of simvastatin to ameliorate endothelial dysfunction through increasing NO bioavailability and through suppression of oxidative stress and vascular inflammation and its ability to enhance the effect of ramipril on these parameters may play a pivotal role in these effects."( Simvastatin enhances the antihypertensive effect of ramipril in hypertensive hypercholesterolemic animals and patients. Possible role of nitric oxide, oxidative stress, and high sensitivity C-reactive protein.
Abdel-Zaher, AO; Abudahab, LH; Elbakry, MH; Elkoussi, AE; Elsayed, EA, 2012
)
2.06
" The strategy of increasing the in vitro dissolution has the potential to enhance the oral bioavailability when using nanosized crystalline drugs."( Enhanced dissolution rate and oral bioavailability of simvastatin nanocrystal prepared by sonoprecipitation.
Han, N; Jiang, T; Wang, S; Xie, Y; Zhao, B, 2012
)
0.63
"The aim of this article was to prepare simvastatin nanocrystals to enhance its dissolution rate and bioavailability by exploiting sonoprecipitation."( Enhanced dissolution rate and oral bioavailability of simvastatin nanocrystal prepared by sonoprecipitation.
Han, N; Jiang, T; Wang, S; Xie, Y; Zhao, B, 2012
)
0.9
" Consequently, the absolute bioavailability (AB) values of diltiazem in the presence of simvastatin (1."( Effects of simvastatin on the pharmacokinetics of diltiazem and its main metabolite, desacetyldiltiazem, after oral and intravenous administration in rats: possible role of P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4 inhibition by simvastatin.
Choi, DH; Choi, JS; Li, C, 2011
)
0.98
"The aim of this work is to improve the oral bioavailability of poorly water soluble drug, simvastatin (SV) through combining the advantages of self-nanoemulsifying systems (SNEs) and tablets."( Self nano-emulsifying simvastatin based tablets: design and in vitro/in vivo evaluation.
Abdelbary, G; Amin, M; Salah, S,
)
0.67
"Due to the multi-factorial physiological implications of bariatric surgery, attempts to explain trends in oral bioavailability following bariatric surgery using singular attributes of drugs or simplified categorisations such as the biopharmaceutics classification system have been unsuccessful."( A mechanistic pharmacokinetic model to assess modified oral drug bioavailability post bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients: interplay between CYP3A gut wall metabolism, permeability and dissolution.
Ammori, BJ; Ashcroft, DM; Darwich, AS; Jamei, M; Pade, D; Rostami-Hodjegan, A, 2012
)
0.38
"The trends in oral bioavailability pre to post surgery were found to be dependent on a combination of drug parameters, including solubility, permeability and gastrointestinal metabolism as well as the surgical procedure carried out."( A mechanistic pharmacokinetic model to assess modified oral drug bioavailability post bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients: interplay between CYP3A gut wall metabolism, permeability and dissolution.
Ammori, BJ; Ashcroft, DM; Darwich, AS; Jamei, M; Pade, D; Rostami-Hodjegan, A, 2012
)
0.38
"In the absence of clinical studies, the ability to project the direction and the magnitude of changes in bioavailability of drug therapy, using evidence-based mechanistic pharmacokinetic in silico models would be of significant value in guiding prescribers to make the necessary adjustments to dosage regimens for an increasing population of patients who are undergoing bariatric surgery."( A mechanistic pharmacokinetic model to assess modified oral drug bioavailability post bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients: interplay between CYP3A gut wall metabolism, permeability and dissolution.
Ammori, BJ; Ashcroft, DM; Darwich, AS; Jamei, M; Pade, D; Rostami-Hodjegan, A, 2012
)
0.38
" About 40% of drugs are not soluble in water in practice and therefore are slowly absorbed, which results in insufficient and uneven bioavailability and GI toxicity."( Solubility enhancement of simvastatin: a review.
Murtaza, G,
)
0.43
" The relative bioavailability of SIM and Simvastatin β-hydroxy acid (SIMA) for nanosuspensions layered pellets compared with commercial tablets was 117% and 173%, respectively."( Preparation, characterization, stability and in vitro-in vivo evaluation of pellet-layered Simvastatin nanosuspensions.
Feng, J; Luo, Y; Tang, X; Tao, X; Xu, L; Xu, M, 2013
)
0.88
"This study investigates the potential of supersaturated self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (super-SNEDDS) to improve the bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs compared to conventional SNEDDS."( Supersaturated self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (Super-SNEDDS) enhance the bioavailability of the poorly water-soluble drug simvastatin in dogs.
Garmer, M; Holm, R; Karlsson, JJ; Müllertz, A; Rades, T; Thomas, N, 2013
)
0.59
" The results demonstrate that chronic ingestion of high doses of CAP will decrease the bioavailability of SV to a significant extent in rats."( Food-drug interactions: effect of capsaicin on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and its active metabolite in rats.
Chen, JG; Liu, JM; Lu, YN; Shi, F; Zhai, XJ, 2013
)
0.62
"Low aqueous solubility is often a limiting aspect to the bioavailability of poorly soluble, but highly permeable drugs (class II compounds according to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System - BCS) administered in single drug products or as fixed dose combinations."( New formulation approaches to improve solubility and drug release from fixed dose combinations: case examples pioglitazone/glimepiride and ezetimibe/simvastatin.
Dressman, JB; Klein, S; Taupitz, T, 2013
)
0.59
" Nanosized self-assembled structured liquid systems are modified microemulsions that present an alternative pathway for improving the bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs."( Solubilization of simvastatin and phytosterols in a dilutable microemulsion system.
Aserin, A; Fisher, S; Garti, N; Wachtel, EJ, 2013
)
0.72
" Besides, its cholesterol-lowering effect, the ability of simvastatin to ameliorate endothelial dysfunction through increasing NO bioavailability and through suppression of oxidative stress and vascular inflammation may play an important role in these effects."( Effect of simvastatin on the antihypertensive activity of losartan in hypertensive hypercholesterolemic animals and patients: role of nitric oxide, oxidative stress, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
Abdel-Zaher, AO; Abudahab, LH; Elbakry, MH; Elkoussi, AE; Elsayed, EA, 2014
)
1.05
"Simvastatin is poorly bioavailable as it is practically insoluble in water and shows dissolution rate-limited absorption."( Simvastatin nanoemulsion for improved oral delivery: design, characterisation, in vitro and in vivo studies.
Chavhan, SS; Petkar, KC; Sawant, KK, 2013
)
3.28
" Furthermore, the oral bioavailability of SIM-loaded SHMC (spherical HMC nanomatrix) in beagle dogs was compared with that of the reference formulation (Zocor®)."( Highly ordered mesoporous carbon nanomatrix as a new approach to improve the oral absorption of the water-insoluble drug, simvastatin.
Gao, C; Li, L; Li, X; Wang, H; Zhang, Y, 2013
)
0.6
" Amlodipine concentrations were assumed to influence the clearance of simvastatin and simvastatin acid, which as well as the oral bioavailability was allowed to vary depending on genetic polymorphisms of metabolic enzymes."( Development of a pharmacokinetic interaction model for co-administration of simvastatin and amlodipine.
Jang, SB; Lee, D; Lim, LA; Park, K; Roh, H; Son, H, 2014
)
0.87
"Simvastatin has low aqueous solubility resulting in low oral bioavailability (5%) and thus presents a challenge in formulating a suitable dosage form."( Preparation and characterization of Simvastatin solid dispersion using skimmed milk.
Banerjee, SK; Behera, AL; Gaikwad, DD; Harer, SL; Sonar, PA, 2015
)
2.13
" Knockin of OATP1B1 or OATP1B3 partially restored control clearance, volume, and bioavailability values (24%-142% increase, ≤47% increase, and ≤77% decrease vs."( Utility of Oatp1a/1b-knockout and OATP1B1/3-humanized mice in the study of OATP-mediated pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution: case studies with pravastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, and carboxydichlorofluorescein.
Bao, JQ; Fallon, JK; Higgins, JW; Ke, AB; Manro, JR; Smith, PC; Zamek-Gliszczynski, MJ, 2014
)
0.6
" Nevertheless, serious efforts are still being made to develop new SV formulations with, for example, improved tabletability or bioavailability properties."( Thermal stability of simvastatin under different atmospheres.
Bernardes, CE; Cordeiro, C; Dias, A; Diogo, HP; Minas Da Piedade, ME; Oliveira, MC; Simões, RG, 2014
)
0.72
" The dissolution, contact angle and water absorption rate of these solid dispersions were measured to elucidate the relationship between wettability and dissolution."( Understanding the relationship between wettability and dissolution of solid dispersion.
Lian, R; Lu, Y; Qi, J; Tang, N; Wu, W, 2014
)
0.4
" Simvastatin preserved eNOS activity and nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability during occlusion and attenuated superoxide production following reperfusion."( The effect of acute simvastatin administration on the severity of arrhythmias resulting from ischaemia and reperfusion in the canine: Is there a role for nitric oxide?
Gardi, J; Kaszaki, J; Kisvári, G; Kovács, M; Seprényi, G; Végh, Á, 2014
)
1.64
" The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of VD supplementation on the bioavailability and lipid lowering effect of simvastatin (ST)."( Effect of vitamin D on bioavailability and lipid lowering efficacy of simvastatin.
Al-Asmari, AK; Al-Eid, A; Al-Omani, SF; Al-Sabaan, F; Tariq, M; Ullah, Z, 2015
)
0.85
"The aim of this study was to obtain a stable, amorphous solid dispersion (SD) with Soluplus, prepared by hot-melt extrusion (HME) as an effective and stable oral delivery system to improve the physical stability and bioavailability of the poorly water-soluble simvastatin (SIM), a drug with relatively low Tg."( Extruded Soluplus/SIM as an oral delivery system: characterization, interactions, in vitro and in vivo evaluations.
Liu, Y; Luo, Y; Tang, X; Tian, B; Yao, Q; Zhang, Y; Zhong, Y, 2016
)
0.61
" However, green tea may interfere with the oral bioavailability or activity of cardiovascular drugs by various mechanisms, potentially leading to reduced drug efficacy or increased drug toxicity."( Overview of green tea interaction with cardiovascular drugs.
Adachi, E; Cavalca, V; Giroli, MG; Inui, N; Kawabe, K; Laguzzi, F; Misaka, S; Myasoedova, V; Onoue, S; Squellerio, I; Takeuchi, K; Tremoli, E; Veglia, F; Watanabe, H; Werba, JP; Yamada, S, 2015
)
0.42
"New drug formulations are sought for poorly water-soluble substances because there is a risk of compromised bioavailability if such substances are administered orally."( Structural insight into the physical stability of amorphous Simvastatin dispersed in pHPMA: enhanced dynamics and local clustering as evidenced by solid-state NMR and Raman spectroscopy.
Brus, J; Kredatusova, J; Sturcova, A; Urbanova, M, 2015
)
0.66
" In vivo pharmacokinetics in rats showed an increase in bioavailability of micronised simvastatin (3."( Micronisation of simvastatin by the supercritical antisolvent technique: in vitro-in vivo evaluation.
Patel, JK; Sutariya, VB, 2015
)
0.98
" Bioavailability estimation in rats revealed an augmentation in SMV bioavailability from the optimized SMV-zein formulation, by fourfold relative to SMV suspension."( Optimization of caseinate-coated simvastatin-zein nanoparticles: improved bioavailability and modified release characteristics.
Ahmed, OA; Al-Sawahli, MM; Fahmy, UA; Hosny, KM, 2015
)
0.7
"An early prediction of solubility in physiological media (PBS, SGF and SIF) is useful to predict qualitatively bioavailability and absorption of lead candidates."( Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
Bharate, SS; Vishwakarma, RA, 2015
)
0.42
"This study compared formulation effects of a dendrimer and a liposome preparation on the water solubility, transepithelial transport, and oral bioavailability of simvastatin (SMV)."( G5 PAMAM dendrimer versus liposome: a comparison study on the in vitro transepithelial transport and in vivo oral absorption of simvastatin.
Banaszak Holl, MM; Cao, Y; Chen, C; He, B; Liu, G; Qi, R; Shen, W; van Dongen, MA; Wang, C; Wang, S; Wang, Y; Xu, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, Q, 2015
)
0.82
" In this study, the authors compared G5 PAMAM dendrimers to liposome preparations in terms of solubility, transepithelial transport, and oral bioavailability of this poorly water-soluble drug."( G5 PAMAM dendrimer versus liposome: a comparison study on the in vitro transepithelial transport and in vivo oral absorption of simvastatin.
Banaszak Holl, MM; Cao, Y; Chen, C; He, B; Liu, G; Qi, R; Shen, W; van Dongen, MA; Wang, C; Wang, S; Wang, Y; Xu, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, Q, 2015
)
0.62
" However, taken orally, their bioavailability is low to the bones."( Single-dose local simvastatin injection improves implant fixation via increased angiogenesis and bone formation in an ovariectomized rat model.
Cui, Y; Fu, X; Guo, Q; Leng, H; Ma, T; Song, C; Tan, J; Yang, N; Yin, X, 2015
)
0.75
" Studies have found that simvastatin stimulates bone formation, but the skeletal bioavailability of orally administered is low."( A single CT-guided percutaneous intraosseous injection of thermosensitive simvastatin/poloxamer 407 hydrogel enhances vertebral bone formation in ovariectomized minipigs.
Cui, YY; Du, GH; Fu, X; Guo, Q; Leng, HJ; Liu, C; Liu, ZJ; Ma, T; Song, CL; Sun, CG; Tan, J; Wang, H; Xu, YS; Yin, X; Zhang, XH, 2016
)
0.97
" Pharmacokinetic evaluation in rabbits indicated higher AUC for the formulation with highest content of thiomer and level 'A' correlation could be established from the generated dissolution and bioavailability data."( Formulation of mucoadhesive gastric retentive drug delivery using thiolated xyloglucan.
Bargaje, RV; Bhalekar, MR; Kshirsagar, SJ; Madgulkar, AR; Upadhaya, PG, 2016
)
0.43
" Moreover, neutral liposomes exhibited higher bioavailability in plasma 4 hours after being administered."( Charge effect of a liposomal delivery system encapsulating simvastatin to treat experimental ischemic stroke in rats.
Campos-Martorell, M; Cano-Sarabia, M; Hernández-Guillamon, M; Maspoch, D; Montaner, J; Rosell, A; Simats, A, 2016
)
0.68
" Thus, simvastatin encapsulation might be a promising strategy to ensure that the drug reaches the brain, while increasing its bioavailability and reducing possible side effects."( Charge effect of a liposomal delivery system encapsulating simvastatin to treat experimental ischemic stroke in rats.
Campos-Martorell, M; Cano-Sarabia, M; Hernández-Guillamon, M; Maspoch, D; Montaner, J; Rosell, A; Simats, A, 2016
)
1.13
" The aim of this study is to use a simple, fast, and nondestructive near-infrared transmission spectroscopic method to quantify simvastatin (SMV) concentrations in mice plasma and also to improve SMV bioavailability by using alpha-lipoic acid as a carrier."( Quantification of simvastatin in mice plasma by near-infrared and chemometric analysis of spectral data.
Fahmy, UA, 2016
)
0.97
" The results of biological studies revealed that administration of SV loaded NLCs to rats increased SV bioavailability compared to SV suspension."( Simvastatin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers attenuate the atherogenic risk of erythrocytes in hyperlipidemic rats.
Alomrani, AH; Badran, MM; Harisa, GI, 2017
)
1.9
" Statins have been found to stimulate bone formation, but the bioavailability from oral administration is low."( Intraosseous Injection of Simvastatin in Poloxamer 407 Hydrogel Improves Pedicle-Screw Fixation in Ovariectomized Minipigs.
Fu, X; Leng, HJ; Song, CL; Sun, CG; Tan, J; Xu, YS, 2016
)
0.73
" Impaired bioavailability of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is one of the main reasons of endothelial dysfunction."( mZD7349 peptide-conjugated PLGA nanoparticles directed against VCAM-1 for targeted delivery of simvastatin to restore dysfunctional HUVECs.
Amani, A; Deiham, B; Doosti, M; Faramarzi, MA; Imanparast, F; Kobarfard, F; Paknejad, M; Vatannejad, A, 2017
)
0.67
"Categorized as a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) Class II drugs, statin exhibit low aqueous solubility and bioavailability thus presenting an obstacle and great challenge to formulation researchers."( Arginine Complexes with Simvastatin: Apparent Solubility, In Vitro Dissolution and Solid State Characterization.
Affandi, MMRMM; Majeed, ABA; Tripathy, M, 2018
)
0.79
"Abolition of diazepam anxiolytic effect during concomitant use of simvastatin is probably caused by diminished bioavailability of diazepam, although pharmacodynamic interaction between these drugs cannot be excluded."( Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between simvastatin and diazepam in rats.
Rutkowska, M; Słupski, W; Trocha, M, 2017
)
0.94
"In the context of the global prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency, we compared two key determinants of the bioavailability of 3 vitamin D forms with significant biopotencies: cholecalciferol, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol and 1-α-hydroxycholecalciferol."( Comparison of the Micellar Incorporation and the Intestinal Cell Uptake of Cholecalciferol, 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol and 1-α-Hydroxycholecalciferol.
Borel, P; Desmarchelier, C; Margier, M; Nowicki, M; Prévéraud, DP; Reboul, E; Rosilio, V, 2017
)
0.46
"The purpose of the current study is to develop nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) for the delivery of the antihyperlipidemic drug simvastatin (SIM) to increase its extremely low oral bioavailability (<5%) and prolong its antihyperlipidemic effect."( Nanostructured lipid carriers for improved oral delivery and prolonged antihyperlipidemic effect of simvastatin.
Allam, A; El-Badry, M; Elsabahy, M; Fathi, HA; Fetih, G, 2018
)
0.9
"In comparison to other published results, this study considered the extensive pre-systemic clearance of SV, which could significantly decrease its systemic and hepatic bioavailability if SV is delivered into the small intestine."( In vitro/in silico approach in the development of simvastatin-loaded self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems.
Ćetković, Z; Cvijić, S; Vasiljević, D, 2018
)
0.73
"The obtained results suggested that combined strategy for the improvement of SV bioavailability should comprise solubility enhancement and delayed drug release."( In vitro/in silico approach in the development of simvastatin-loaded self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems.
Ćetković, Z; Cvijić, S; Vasiljević, D, 2018
)
0.73
" However, oral (PO) administration of berberine is hindered by poor bioavailability and increasing dose often elicits gastro-intestinal side effects."( Comparative pharmacokinetics and safety assessment of transdermal berberine and dihydroberberine.
Azike, CG; Baranowski, DC; Buchanan, B; Gabriele, J; Meng, Q; Poulin, MM; Zuccolo, J, 2018
)
0.48
"Simvastatin is poorly bioavailable because it is practically insoluble in water and shows dissolution rate-limited absorption."( Preparation and characterization of simvastatin/DMβCD complex and its pharmacokinetics in rats.
Fan, H; Gu, F; Ning, J; Wang, Y; Wu, C, 2018
)
2.2
" However, SIM has low bioavailability and may induce the upregulation of the BMP-2-antagonistic noggin protein, which greatly limits the osteogenic effect."( pH-Sensitive Nanocarrier-Mediated Codelivery of Simvastatin and Noggin siRNA for Synergistic Enhancement of Osteogenesis.
Chen, B; Cheng, D; Deng, S; Fang, J; Feng, X; Huang, J; Li, X; Lin, C; Shuai, X; Su, W; Wang, J; Zhang, S, 2018
)
0.74
" In the preliminary formulation development phase 1-oleoyl-rac-glycerol was chosen as the oily lipid phase, based on the high drug solubility and potential bioavailability enhancement capability."( A redispersible dry emulsion system with simvastatin prepared via fluid bed layering as a means of dissolution enhancement of a lipophilic drug.
Dreu, R; Luštrik, M; Pirker, L; Pohlen, M, 2018
)
0.75
" The PLGA-based hybrid nanocarrier system has been designed in such a way to evade the low bioavailability of SMV, confer sustained release of both encapsulated and chemically conjugated SMV, as well as enhancing the anti-cancer effect of the formula via the magnetic targeting with the aid of the encapsulated SPIONS."( Hybrid nanocarrier system for guiding and augmenting simvastatin cytotoxic activity against prostate cancer.
El-Sherbiny, IM; Khalil, IA; Sedki, M, 2018
)
0.73
"The purpose of the study was formulation development, optimization and evaluation of a Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System (SEDDS) of Simvastatin (SIM) for improvement in dissolution and bioavailability of SIM."( Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System of Simvastatin: Formulation Development, Optimization by Box- Behnken Design,
Kumar, Y; Nanda, A; Verma, M, 2018
)
0.95
"Pharmacokinetic analyses revealed an increase in the bioavailability of simvastatin when co-administered with amlodipine [Nishio S et al."( Analysis of secondary care data to evaluate the clinical relevance of the drug-drug interaction between amlodipine and simvastatin.
Fuhrmann, S; Knoth, H; Koppen, A; Schröder, J; Seeling, A, 2019
)
0.95
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
"Silica-lipid hybrid (SLH) microparticles are a solidified lipid-based drug delivery system under investigation for their aptitude to enhance the oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs."( Enhancing the oral bioavailability of simvastatin with silica-lipid hybrid particles: The effect of supersaturation and silica geometry.
Meola, TR; Peressin, KF; Prestidge, CA; Schultz, HB, 2020
)
0.83
"Simvastatin (SMV), a hypocholesterolemic agent, suffers from very low bioavailability due to its poor aqueous solubility and extensive first-pass metabolism."( Enhancement of Simvastatin ex vivo Permeation from Mucoadhesive Buccal Films Loaded with Dual Drug Release Carriers.
Ahmed, TA; Alharbi, WS; Bawazir, AO; Safo, MK, 2020
)
2.35
"This study aimed to enhance the dissolution of simvastatin (SMV) through its formulation in liquisolid tablets (LSTs) to improve its bioavailability and hypolipidemic activity after oral administration."( Enhancing the Hypolipidemic Effect of Simvastatin in Poloxamer-Induced Hyperlipidemic Rats via Liquisolid Approach: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation.
Ahmed, OAA; Ahmed, TA; El-Say, KM; Elimam, H, 2020
)
1.09
" However, due to its poor intrinsic water solubility, the drug is poorly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and exhibits a low oral bioavailability of approximately 5%."( A safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic study of a novel simvastatin silica-lipid hybrid formulation in healthy male participants.
Abuhelwa, AY; Clifton, P; Joyce, P; Meola, TR; Prestidge, CA, 2021
)
0.86
"Co-crystallization with NIC improved the solubility and dissolution profile and, hence, the bioavailability of the poorly water-soluble drug SIM."( Simvastatin-Nicotinamide Co-Crystals: Formation, Pharmaceutical Characterization and in vivo Profile.
Ahmad, M; Idrees, HA; Khan, FM, 2020
)
2
"Because of the low solubility, the oral bioavailability of simvastatin (SV) was poor, which restricted the application in clinic."( A promising nanomatrix system of simvastatin for oral delivery: Evaluation in vitro and in vivo.
Cui, Z; Duan, L; He, S; Li, Y; Zhang, X, 2020
)
1.08
" Delivery of simvastatin in the form of an inclusion complex with HPβCD is proposed as an approach improving its bioavailability in the cholesterol-lowering therapies."( Incorporation of simvastatin into lipid membranes: Why deliver a statin in form of inclusion complex with hydrophilic cyclodextrin.
Bartkowiak, A; Bilewicz, R; Broniatowski, M; Krzak, A; Matyszewska, D; Zaborowska, M, 2021
)
1.33
"Although simvastatin (SIM) has been proven to be a powerful agent against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (MI/R) injury, poor water solubility, short half-life, and low bioavailability have made it futile while using conventional drug delivery system."( Simvastatin-loaded nano-niosomes confer cardioprotection against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury.
Aboutaleb, N; Akbarzade, I; Naseroleslami, M; Niri, NM; Sharifi, M, 2022
)
2.58
" Thus, these biocompatible nanoparticles have the potential to bypass poor CoQ oral bioavailability as a treatment option for individuals with severe CoQ deficiency syndromes and/or aging-related CoQ depletion."( Coenzyme Q nanodisks counteract the effect of statins on C2C12 myotubes.
Dagda, RK; Moschetti, A; Ryan, RO, 2021
)
0.62
" The pleiotropic effects of statins have been well described in many in vitro and in vivo studies, but these effects are difficult to achieve in clinical practice due to the low bioavailability of statins and their first-pass metabolism in the liver."( Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Very High Dose Local Vessel Wall Statin Administration: Poly(L,L-Lactide) Biodegradable Microspheres with Simvastatin for Drug Delivery System (DDS).
Basinska, T; Czuczwar, S; Dabrowski, W; Gadzinowski, M; Kocki, J; Oru, N; Slomkowski, S; Szumilo, J; Vicaut, E; Wacinski, J; Wacinski, P, 2021
)
0.82
" Among the two technologies, fluid bed layering provided dry emulsion products with higher relative bioavailability and better product characteristics for further processing into final dosage forms."( Relative bioavailability enhancement of simvastatin via dry emulsion systems: Comparison of spray drying and fluid bed layering technology.
Aguiar Zdovc, J; Dreu, R; Gosenca Matjaž, M; Grabnar, I; Mravljak, J; Pohlen, M; Snoj, T; Trontelj, J, 2022
)
0.99
" Due to low bioavailability and short half-life of simvastatin, liposomal NPs have the potential to enhance drug delivery, however, in this study NP did not provide improvement over simvastatin, but did demonstrate their potential for the delivery of simvastatin."( Simvastatin-loaded liposome nanoparticles treatment for uterine leiomyoma in a patient-derived xenograft mouse model: a pilot study.
Afrin, S; Borahay, MA; El Sabeh, M; Kilic, GS; Motamedi, M; Ozpolat, B; Saada, J; Vincent, KL; Yang, J, 2022
)
2.42
" Among NS and SNEDDS, NS was found more efficacious than that of the SNEDDS possibly due to higher enhancement of oral bioavailability in case of NS."( Expanding arsenal against diabetes mellitus through nanoformulations loaded with glimepiride and simvastatin: A comparative study.
Chellappan, DK; Dua, K; Dureja, H; Gulati, M; Gupta, G; Gupta, PK; Gupta, S; Jha, NK; Jha, SK; Khursheed, R; Kumar, B; Pandey, NK; Prasher, P; Sharma, A; Singh, SK; Vishwas, S, 2022
)
0.94
" However, the low bioavailability of oral statin formulations is a key barrier to achieving effective doses within tumour."( Formulation of simvastatin within high density lipoprotein enables potent tumour radiosensitisation.
Badiee, P; Berbeco, RI; Cheah, E; Dehghankelishadi, P; Dmochowska, N; Kempson, I; Maritz, MF; Thierry, B, 2022
)
1.07
"Self-emulsifying drug-delivery systems (SEDDSs) are designed to improve the oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs."( Development and Evaluation of Self-Emulsifying Drug-Delivery System-Based Tablets for Simvastatin, a BCS Class II Drug.
Abbas, M; Bashir, MA; Goh, KW; Khan, A; Khuda, F; Ming, LC; Shah, SI; Ullah, M, 2023
)
1.13
"Using commonly available excipients and machinery, SEDDS-based tablets with better dissolution profile and bioavailability can be prepared by direct compression."( Development and Evaluation of Self-Emulsifying Drug-Delivery System-Based Tablets for Simvastatin, a BCS Class II Drug.
Abbas, M; Bashir, MA; Goh, KW; Khan, A; Khuda, F; Ming, LC; Shah, SI; Ullah, M, 2023
)
1.13

Dosage Studied

Simvastatin was administered at a dosage of 5 mg/day for 24 weeks to 38 HD patients with high serum total cholesterol (TC) levels (200 mg/dl) or low high-density lipoprotein choles. In rat liver slices, the dose-response curves for inhibition of [14C]acetate incorporation into cholesterol were similar for the active acid forms of lovastatin, simvstatin, and pravastatin.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either colestipol placebo or colestipol 5 g or 10 g each morning in fixed dosage for 18 weeks."( Successful management of primary hypercholesterolaemia with simvastatin and low-dose colestipol.
Parfitt, A; Simons, J; Simons, LA, 1992
)
0.53
" Such combination therapy offers the possibility of improved cholesterol lowering without the need for full dosage of either drug."( Successful management of primary hypercholesterolaemia with simvastatin and low-dose colestipol.
Parfitt, A; Simons, J; Simons, LA, 1992
)
0.53
" Various dosing regimens of 10, 20, and 40 mg/day were employed."( Efficacy and tolerability of medium-term treatment with simvastatin in primary hypercholesterolaemia.
Cattaneo, R; Colombo, F; Geroli, L; Marnini, P; Venco, A, 1992
)
0.53
"The effects of age and of gender on the plasma profiles of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors following separate once-a-day dosage regimens (17 days) of lovastatin (80 mg/day) and simvastatin (40 mg/day) were studied in hypercholesterolemic patients."( Influence of age and gender on the plasma profiles of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitory activity following multiple doses of lovastatin and simvastatin.
Amin, RD; Cheng, H; Dobrinska, MR; Quan, H; Rogers, JD; Stein, EA; Sweany, AE; Tate, AC, 1992
)
0.67
" The mean dosage of the simvastatin at fourth month was of 25 mg/die."( [Mid-term clinical study of the effectiveness of and tolerability to simvastatin ++ in dyslipidemic patients].
Aiello, C; De Lucia, R; Dragonetti, C; Irace, L; Papa, A; Petraglia, L; Sannino, A, 1992
)
0.83
" The subjects selected for the study were suffering from uremia either complied with dosage prescribed or not."( [Dyslipidemia in the uremic patient: the therapeutic role played by simvastatin].
Angelé, B; Bellinghieri, G; Savica, V, 1992
)
0.52
" This original design allowed to define the most appropriate individual cholesterol-lowering drug dosage in FH patients."( Lecithin: cholesterol acyltransferase activity in familial hypercholesterolemia treated with simvastatin and simvastatin plus low-dose colestipol.
Desager, JP; Harvengt, C; Horsmans, Y, 1991
)
0.5
" Adequate precision was obtained to reliably verify drug dosage levels."( Rapid verification of identity and content of drug formulations using mid-infrared spectroscopy.
Brooks, MA; Compton, DA; Compton, SV; Ryan, JA, 1991
)
0.28
"The effects of long-term dosing with inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase on the rate of cholesterol biosynthesis were examined in the lens and liver of rats and hamsters."( Effects of long-term administration of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on cholesterol synthesis in lens.
Kalinowski, SS; Mosley, ST; Tanaka, RD, 1991
)
0.28
"An extended-release osmotic dosage form was designed for gastrointestinal delivery of the water-soluble tromethamine salt of the beta-hydroxyacid form of simvastatin, a potent HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor and cholesterol lowering agent."( Enhancement of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor efficacy through administration of a controlled-porosity osmotic pump dosage form.
Fix, JA; McClelland, GA; Pogany, SA; Stubbs, RJ; Zentner, GM, 1991
)
0.48
" Twenty-seven Japanese white rabbits were divided according to dosage of simvastatin into four groups as follows, group P (placebo, 5 rabbits), group MK 1 (simvastatin 1mg/kg, 5 rabbits), group MK 3 (simvastatin 3mg/kg, 6 rabbits) and group MK 5 (simvastatin 5mg/kg, 5 rabbits)."( [Preventive effect of simvastatin, a competitive inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, on coronary atherosclerosis in cholesterol-fed rabbits].
Oogushi, K, 1991
)
0.83
" Patients were treated with progressively increasing doses of simvastatin (20, 40, and 80 mg day-1) taken in a twice-daily dosage for a period of 6 weeks on each dose."( The effects of simvastatin on plasma lipoproteins and cholesterol homeostasis in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia.
Hagemenas, FC; Illingworth, DR; Pappu, AS, 1990
)
0.87
" Bezafibrate was administered as a 200 mg dose 3 times daily, while simvastatin dosage ranged from 10 mg to 40 mg once daily at night."( Bezafibrate and simvastatin (MK-733) in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia.
Jankelow, D; Myburgh, DP; Neutel, JM; Smith, DH, 1990
)
0.86
" The initial dosage of simvastatin was 10 mg/day; dosage was titrated up to 10 mg/day or to a minimum of 5 mg/day in intervals of at least 4 weeks, in order to maintain LDL-cholesterol below 140 mg/dl."( [Simvastatin (MK-733), a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia in elderly patients with atherosclerosis].
de Góes, JM; Dereviack, BE; Diament, J; Forti, N; Giannini, SD; Machado, C, 1990
)
1.5
" Analysis of lenses from dogs chronically dosed with various HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors revealed the presence of low drug levels in the lens (less than 500 ng equivalents g-1), but no correlation was observed between the amount of drug associated with the lens after chronic treatment and cataract development."( On the etiology of subcapsular lenticular opacities produced in dogs receiving HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
Alberts, AW; Bokelman, DL; Chen, J; Gerson, RJ; Greenspan, MD; MacDonald, JS; Rubin, LF; Yudkovitz, JB, 1990
)
0.28
" Our phase I results were commensurate with those reported for the entire international cohort of 272 patients, indicating a clear dose-response relationship, with approximately 75% of the maximum reduction in LDL-C levels being achieved with 20 mg/day and over 90% of the maximum being achieved with 40 mg of simvastatin per day."( Treatment of hypercholesterolemia with the HMG CoA reductase inhibitor, simvastatin.
Baker, SG; Berger, GM; Joffe, BI; Marais, AD; Mendelsohn, D; Seftel, HC; Welsh, NH, 1989
)
0.68
" In rat liver slices, the dose-response curves for inhibition of [14C]acetate incorporation into cholesterol were similar for the active acid forms of lovastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin."( Tissue-selective acute effects of inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase on cholesterol biosynthesis in lens.
Kalinowski, SS; Mosley, ST; Schafer, BL; Tanaka, RD, 1989
)
0.47
" The initial dosage of simvastatin was a tablet of 10 mg/day, increased after a month to 20 mg and then to 40 mg/die."( [Effect of a long-term treatment with simvastatin, an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, in dyslipidemic patients at high risk].
Abrignani, MG; Alaimo, G; Averna, MR; Barbagallo, CM; Davì, G; Marino, G; Notarbartolo, A; Novo, S; Strano, A, 1989
)
0.86
" Many of the toxicities produced by high dosage levels of simvastatin in animals are directly related to the drug's biochemical mechanism of action and are the result of a profound, sustained inhibition of the target enzyme that is not anticipated at clinical dosages."( Animal safety and toxicology of simvastatin and related hydroxy-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors.
Alberts, AW; Bokelman, DL; Gerson, RJ; Kornbrust, DJ; MacDonald, JS; Majka, JA; Stubbs, RJ, 1989
)
0.8
" Gemfibrozil was given in a constant dosage of 600 mg twice daily in both strata."( Comparison of low-dose simvastatin and gemfibrozil in the treatment of elevated plasma cholesterol. A multicenter study. The Simvastatin Study Group.
Bocanegra, TS; Cook, T; Tikkanen, MJ; Walker, JF, 1989
)
0.59
" Simvastatin at the dosage of 10 mg appeared to be at least as efficient as 12 g of cholestyramine and generally better tolerated."( Comparison between low-dose simvastatin and cholestyramine in moderately severe hypercholesterolemia.
Deslypere, JP, 1989
)
1.48
" In the range of dosage from 10 to 40 mg once daily, therapy is associated with reductions of up to 30 percent in total cholesterol and 40 percent in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, as well as with increases of approximately 10 percent in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels."( Simvastatin: the clinical profile.
Walker, JF, 1989
)
1.72
" This difference is consistent throughout the dosage range."( Pharmaco-economic assessment of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
Smart, AJ; Walters, L, 1994
)
0.29
"8% higher than an equivalent milligram dose of pravastatin, depending on the dosage used."( Pharmaco-economic assessment of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
Smart, AJ; Walters, L, 1994
)
0.29
" Severe renal insufficiency may necessitate dosage modification in lovastatin recipients."( Interactions with hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors.
Garnett, WR, 1995
)
0.29
" Dose-response curves for serotonin-induced vasodilatation, an index of nitric oxide-dependent vasodilatation, showed a comparable and significant rightward shift after a medication-free period of 2 and 6 weeks compared with control subjects, indicating endothelial dysfunction, which was already maximum after 2 weeks."( Vascular function in the forearm of hypercholesterolaemic patients off and on lipid-lowering medication.
de Bruin, TW; Koomans, HA; Rabelink, TJ; Stroes, ES, 1995
)
0.29
" The drugs were administered in dosages of 10 mg/kg from the fourth to seventh weeks; at the end of the seventh week, plasma cholesterol was determined, and the Pravastatin dosage adjusted to 15 mg/kg to obtain similar levels of plasma cholesterol for the two experimental groups."( Effects of simvastatin and pravastatin on endothelium-dependent relaxation in hypercholesterolemic rabbits.
Jorge, PA; Metze, K; Ozaki, MR, 1994
)
0.68
" Micronized fenofibrate, a new formulation chemically identical to the parent compound, has improved pharmacokinetic parameters which increase absorption, provide more stable plasma levels, and thus dosage can be decreased."( The fibrates in clinical practice: focus on micronised fenofibrate.
Shepherd, J, 1994
)
0.29
" Fourteen subjects were given simvastatin, and 12 were given pravastatin, both at the maximum therapeutic dosage of 40 mg/day."( Sustained therapy with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme-A reductase inhibitors does not impair steroidogenesis by adrenals and gonads.
Faccini, G; Moghetti, P; Muggeo, M; Negri, C; Tosi, F; Travia, D, 1995
)
0.58
" Simvastatin should be administered in a reduced dosage to CS patients."( Plasma concentration profiles of simvastatin 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitory activity in kidney transplant recipients with and without ciclosporin.
Arnadottir, M; Eriksson, LO; Karkas, JD; Thysell, H, 1993
)
1.48
"Seven sustained/controlled-release dosage forms were designed for gastrointestinal delivery of lovastatin or simvastatin, two potent HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia."( Evaluation of sustained/controlled-release dosage forms of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme a (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors in dogs and humans.
Amin, RD; Cheng, H; Grasing, K; Mitchel, YB; Pipkin, JD; Rogers, JD; Schwartz, JI; Schwartz, MS; Sutton, SC; Zentner, GM, 1993
)
0.5
"Using various concentrations of the drugs, a dose-response curve was constructed for the inhibition of the cholesterol synthesis."( Pravastatin and simvastatin differently inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis in human lens.
Bloemendal, H; Cohen, LH; de Vries, AC; Vermeer, MA, 1993
)
0.63
"The efficacy and safety profile of simvastatin and pravastatin across their most commonly recommended dosage ranges were compared in a double-blind, parallel, multicenter study in 550 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia."( Comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of simvastatin and pravastatin for hypercholesterolemia. The Simvastatin Pravastatin Study Group.
, 1993
)
0.81
" In posttransplant patients receiving cyclosporine, safety has been documented for low doses of lovastatin and simvastatin, but when a higher dosage of an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor is warranted, pravastatin should be considered the drug of choice because of a lower incidence of myopathy."( Comparative evaluation of the safety and efficacy of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor monotherapy in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia.
Hsu, I; Johnson, NE; Spinler, SA,
)
0.34
" Reductions in serum levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol were similar between agents only when lovastatin or pravastatin were administered at a total daily dosage twice that of simvastatin and when fluvastatin was administered at a total daily dosage approximately 8 times that of simvastatin."( Simvastatin. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in hypercholesterolaemia.
McTavish, D; Plosker, GL, 1995
)
1.92
" It is likely that the magnitude of risk reduction produced by lipid-lowering therapy is proportional to the degree of cholesterol lowering achieved, which is an important consideration when selecting an agent and deciding the dosage to use."( Benefits and risks of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in the prevention of coronary heart disease: a reappraisal.
Pedersen, TR; Tobert, JA, 1996
)
0.29
" A metaanalysis of ten trials has shown a 25% decrease in vascular events in the long-term, irrespective of age, gender, blood pressure blood glucose level, and dosage whether low (75 to 160 mg) or moderate (160 to 325 mg/day)."( [Secondary prevention after myocardial infarction; rôle of platelet antiaggregants and hypolipemic agents].
Aumont, MC; Seknadji, P, 1996
)
0.29
" To evaluate the effectiveness of extending the dosage range, 156 subjects with LDL cholesterol >160 mg/dl and triglycerides (TG) <350 mg/dl were randomized to simvastatin at doses of 40, 80, and 160 mg/day in a 26 week, double-blind, 3-period, complete block crossover study."( The efficacy and six-week tolerability of simvastatin 80 and 160 mg/day.
Amin, RD; Davidson, MH; Dobrinska, MR; Dujovne, CA; Hunninghake, DB; Illingworth, DR; Knopp, RH; Melino, MR; Mitchel, YB; Stein, EA; Tobert, JA; Weiss, SR; Zupkis, RV, 1997
)
0.76
" Participants in the 4S were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with simvastatin, 20 mg daily, with blinded dosage titration up to 40 mg daily, according to cholesterol response during the first 6-18 weeks, or placebo."( Cholesterol lowering with simvastatin improves prognosis of diabetic patients with coronary heart disease. A subgroup analysis of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)
Faergeman, O; Kjekshus, J; Olsson, AG; Pedersen, TR; Pyŏrälä, K; Thorgeirsson, G, 1997
)
0.83
"52 mmol/L (400 mg/dl) received once-daily dosing with atorvastatin (Lipitor) 10 mg or simvastatin (Zocor) 10 mg."( A multicenter, double-blind, one-year study comparing safety and efficacy of atorvastatin versus simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Best, J; Black, D; Bracs, P; d'Emden, M; Dart, A; Hamilton-Craig, I; Jerums, G; Nicholson, G; Sullivan, D; Tallis, G; West, M, 1997
)
0.74
" The dosage consisted of 10 mg simvastatin daily during the 3-month trial."( Short-term safety and efficacy of low-dose simvastatin in elderly patients with hypertensive hypercholesterolemia and fasting hyperinsulinemia.
Chan, P; Huang, TY; Lee, C; Lee, YS; Tomlinson, B, 1997
)
0.85
" Micronised fenofibrate has improved absorption characteristics compared with the standard preparation, allowing a lower daily dosage and once-daily administration."( Micronised fenofibrate: a review of its pharmacodynamic properties and clinical efficacy in the management of dyslipidaemia.
Adkins, JC; Faulds, D, 1997
)
0.3
"To investigate the effects of lipid lowering therapy on the fraction unbound and dosage requirement of cyclosporine in heart transplant recipients."( Effect of simvastatin on cyclosporine unbound fraction and apparent blood clearance in heart transplant recipients.
Akhlaghi, F; Brown, KF; Keogh, AM; McLachlan, AJ, 1997
)
0.7
" Cyclosporine daily dosage and total concentration (monoclonal FPIA method) were recorded for periods up to 6 months before and after simvastatin administration."( Effect of simvastatin on cyclosporine unbound fraction and apparent blood clearance in heart transplant recipients.
Akhlaghi, F; Brown, KF; Keogh, AM; McLachlan, AJ, 1997
)
0.9
" The two drugs exhibited similar IC50's for inhibition of either rat or human reductase, and single oral dosing in rats showed the compounds to be nearly equipotent at inhibiting hepatic cholesterol synthesis."( Hepatic responses to inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase: a comparison of atorvastatin and simvastatin.
Bergstrom, JD; Bostedor, RG; Chao, YS; Geissler, WM; Rew, DJ; Wright, SD, 1998
)
0.51
" Concomitant use of potent inhibitors of CYP3A with simvastatin should be avoided or its dosage should be greatly reduced."( Simvastatin but not pravastatin is very susceptible to interaction with the CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole.
Kantola, T; Kivistö, KT; Neuvonen, PJ, 1998
)
1.99
" In accordance with manufacturers' recommendations, maximum dosage was atorvastatin 80 mg daily or simvastatin 40 mg daily (+cholestyramine 4 g daily in 84% of cases)."( Comparison of atorvastatin alone versus simvastatin +/- cholestyramine in the management of severe primary hypercholesterolaemia (the six cities study).
Simons, LA, 1998
)
0.78
" As an alternative, the dosage of simvastatin should be reduced considerably, that is, by about 50% to 80%, at least when a simvastatin dosage higher than 20 mg/day is used."( Erythromycin and verapamil considerably increase serum simvastatin and simvastatin acid concentrations.
Kantola, T; Kivistö, KT; Neuvonen, PJ, 1998
)
0.83
"Phase IIa clinical studies with cerivastatin--including 2 pilot US and European dose-ranging studies, and 1 US dose-scheduling study--were conducted to establish a dosage regimen and effective therapeutic doses of cerivastatin in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia."( Clinical efficacy of cerivastatin: phase IIa dose-ranging and dose-scheduling studies.
Hunninghake, DB, 1998
)
0.3
" Data collected were demographics, number of simvastatin refills, dosage distribution, baseline and posttreatment lipid profiles, and proportion of patients with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels below target as recommended by the National Cholesterol and Education Program."( The outcome of very low dosages of simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Rindone, JP, 1999
)
0.84
"Simvastatin was administered at a dosage of 5 mg/day for 24 weeks to 38 HD patients with high serum total cholesterol (TC) levels (200 mg/dl) or low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (35 mg/dl)."( Effect of simvastatin on the lipid profile of hemodialysis patients.
Kimura, K; Kishino, M; Maeda, A; Maeda, T; Miyano, M; Mune, M; Nishide, I; Nishide, T; Nishikawa, O; Ogawa, A; Otani, H; Takahashi, T; Tone, Y; Yukawa, S, 1999
)
2.15
" These results indicate that NK-104 and simvastatin at 10 times the dosage of the former, similarly enhances hepatic LDL receptor; however, only NK-104 with prolonged action suppresses VLDL secretion to show higher cholesterol-lowering potency and triglyceride-reducing effect."( Hypolipidemic effect of NK-104, a potent HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, in guinea pigs.
Aoki, T; Kitahara, M; Saito, Y; Sato, F; Suzuki, H; Tamaki, T, 1999
)
0.57
"The therapeutic regimens investigated in the analysis were the American Heart Association (AHA) step II diet plus simvastatin (titrated to a maximum dosage of 20 mg/day) and AHA step II diet alone."( Simvastatin after orthotopic heart transplantation. Costs and consequences.
Krobot, KJ; Reichart, B; Wenke, K, 1999
)
1.96
" During the development of simvastatin solid dosage form, formulation compositions were constantly varied to define a suitable matrix."( Second-derivative UV spectrometric determination of simvastatin in its tablet dosage form.
Asgharnejad, M; Wang, L, 2000
)
0.85
" In other experiments carried out on endothelium-removed preparations and in medium containing the calcium antagonist, diltiazem (10(-5) and 10(-6) M), the contraction dose-response curves were significantly reduced and the same happened in the presence of the inhibitor of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca-2+-ATPase, cyclopiazonic acid (CPA) (3 x 10(-6) M)."( Endothelium modulates contractile response to simvastatin in rat aorta.
Alvarez de Sotomayor, M; Herrera, MD; Marhuenda, E; Pérez-Guerrero, C,
)
0.39
" The 10-mg dosage (a fourth or half that used in studies) is the most frequently dispensed."( Growth in use of statins after trials is not targeted to most appropriate patients.
Feely, J; Kelly, A; McGettigan, P, 2000
)
0.31
" The dosage used in humans is also significantly lower and therefore it is expected to have a good safety margin."( Development of thyroid follicular adenoma on simvastatin therapy.
Goenka, S; McCord, EL, 2000
)
0.57
" A venous blood sample for a baseline analysis and another after 4 months of simvastatin therapy at a dosage of 20 mg per day were taken."( Effect of simvastatin therapy on paraoxonase activity and related lipoproteins in familial hypercholesterolemic patients.
Covas, M; García-Faria, F; Marrugat, J; Sentí, M; Tomás, M; Torrents, A; Vila, J, 2000
)
0.94
" These data demonstrate that multiple dosing of simvastatin, at the highest recommended clinical dose, does not significantly alter the in vivo hepatic or intestinal CYP3A4/5 activity as measured by the commonly used EBT and oral midazolam probes."( Simvastatin does not affect CYP3A activity, quantified by the erythromycin breath test and oral midazolam pharmacokinetics, in healthy male subjects.
Brucker, MJ; Gagliano, K; Gillen, L; Greenberg, HE; McLoughlin, D; Prueksaritanont, T; Rogers, JD; Vega, JM; Waldman, SA; Wong, PH, 2000
)
2.01
" Mice were dosed daily for 6 weeks with simvastatin (100 mg/kg body wt)."( Simvastatin has anti-inflammatory and antiatherosclerotic activities independent of plasma cholesterol lowering.
Burton, CA; Chao, YS; Detmers, PA; Hassing, H; Hermanowski-Vosatka, A; Hernandez, M; Mundt, S; Patel, S; Peterson, L; Rosa, R; Sparrow, CP; Wang, PR; Wright, SD; Zhang, D, 2001
)
2.02
" Simvastatin was well tolerated across the dosage range."( Attaining United States and European guideline LDL-cholesterol levels with simvastatin in patients with coronary heart disease (the GOALLS study).
Adams, PC; Brown, AS; Garmendia, F; Reiber, I, 2000
)
1.45
" The medication dosage was doubled after 4 weeks if a subject's LDL-C was not less than 130 mg/dL."( Simvastatin treatment on postprandial hypertriglyceridemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with combined hyperlipidemia.
Chen, YT; Jeng, CY; Lee, WJ; Lin, SY; Pei, D; Sheu, WH, 2001
)
1.75
" The calculated average annual maintenance cost was based on the distribution of the final daily dosing regimens and the public drug prices for each regimen."( Cost-minimization analysis of simvastatin versus atorvastatin for maintenance therapy in patients with coronary or peripheral vascular disease.
Allen, SE; Attanasio, E; Russo, P, 2001
)
0.6
" After a 6-week washout period, patients were randomized to 18 weeks of treatment at an initial dosage of simvastatin 10 mg once daily or fluvastatin 20 mg once daily."( A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of titrate-to-goal regimens of simvastatin and fluvastatin: a randomized, double-blind study in adult patients at moderate to high risk for cardiovascular disease.
Buirma, RJ; den Hartog, FR; Kastelein, JJ; Kragten, HA; Penn, HJ; Trip, MD; van Dam, MJ, 2001
)
0.75
"Two randomized, two-period crossover studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of repeat oral dosing of troglitazone (Study I) and pioglitazone (Study II) on the pharmacokinetics of plasma HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors following multiple oral doses of simvastatin and of simvastatin on the plasma pharmacokinetics of troglitazone (Study I) in healthy subjects."( Interactions between simvastatin and troglitazone or pioglitazone in healthy subjects.
Amin, RD; Dilzer, S; Gagliano, K; Kuznetsova, O; Lasseter, KC; Liu, L; Musser, B; Prueksaritanont, T; Roadcap, BA; Rogers, JD; Vega, JM; Zhao, J, 2001
)
0.81
" The area under the curve (AUC) of simvastatin after concomitant dosing with itraconazole was predicted to increase ca."( Inhibition of in vitro metabolism of simvastatin by itraconazole in humans and prediction of in vivo drug-drug interactions.
Ikeda, T; Inoue, S; Ishigam, M; Ito, K; Iwabuchi, H; Komai, T; Kondo, T; Sugiyama, Y; Takasaki, W; Uchiyama, M, 2001
)
0.86
" The second issue is whether early use of an aggressively dosed statin is superior to a current trial-based "accepted care" regimen of a lower-dose statin started 3 to 6 months after an acute event."( The A-to-Z Trial: Methods and rationale for a single trial investigating combined use of low-molecular-weight heparin with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban and defining the efficacy of early aggressive simvastatin therapy.
Bilheimer, D; Blazing, MA; Braunwald, E; Califf, RM; De Lemos, JA; Dyke, CK, 2001
)
0.5
" The dosage of simvastatin was based on the additional percent reduction in LDL cholesterol needed to achieve the goal specified by the National Cholesterol Education Program."( Effect of pravastatin-to-simvastatin conversion on low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol.
Dresselhaus, TR; Henry, RR; Ito, MK; Lin, JC; Marcus, DB; Morreale, AP; Shabetai, R, 2001
)
0.97
" Dose-response curves of simvastatin for bone formation and resorption differed."( Effect of statins on bone mineral density and bone histomorphometry in rodents.
Conradie, MM; Gopal, R; Hough, S; Hulley, PA; Maritz, FJ, 2001
)
0.61
" Six product brands encompassing 20 dosage strengths have been available during the past two years."( Managed care trends in statin usage.
Bazalo, GR, 2001
)
0.31
" Trends in market share, mean daily dose, and dosage distribution of the six current statin brands were examined."( Managed care trends in statin usage.
Bazalo, GR, 2001
)
0.31
" Nelfinavir increased the steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curve during one dosing period (AUC(tau)) of atorvastatin 74% and the maximum concentration (C(max)) of atorvastatin 122% and increased the AUC(tau) of simvastatin 505% and the C(max) of simvastatin 517%."( Pharmacokinetic interactions between nelfinavir and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors atorvastatin and simvastatin.
Hsyu, PH; Kerr, BM; Lewis, RH; Lillibridge, JH; Schultz-Smith, MD, 2001
)
0.7
"The greater reduction of plasma concentrations of 24S-hydroxycholesterol compared with cholesterol indicates that simvastatin in a dosage of 80 mg/d reduces cholesterol turnover in the brain."( Reduction of plasma 24S-hydroxycholesterol (cerebrosterol) levels using high-dosage simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: evidence that simvastatin affects cholesterol metabolism in the human brain.
Beisiegel, U; Locatelli, S; Lütjohann, D; Otto, C; Schmidt, HH; von Bergmann, K, 2002
)
0.75
"The investigation showed that half-tablet dosing was as effective as whole-tablet dosing."( Effect of tablet splitting on serum cholesterol concentrations.
Castle, SS; Duncan, MC; Streetman, DS, 2002
)
0.31
" In subjects carrying a receptor-defective mutation, however, we observed that 51% of the variability in LDL-cholesterol response was explained by variations in the dosage of simvastatin expressed in mg/kg/day (P=0."( Influence of LDL receptor gene mutation and apo E polymorphism on lipoprotein response to simvastatin treatment among adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.
Bergeron, J; Couture, P; Gagné, C; Lelièvre, M; Lupien, PJ; Szots, F; Vohl, MC, 2002
)
0.73
"01) in high dosage Sim treatment group (n = 9) compared with LVH group."( Effects of simvastatin on activities of endogenous antioxidant enzymes and angiotensin-converting enzyme in rat myocardium with pressure-overload cardiac hypertrophy.
Luo, JD; Ou, HJ; Zhang, GP; Zhang, WW; Zhong, BH, 2002
)
0.7
" In a third, non-randomized treatment period after a second wash-out interval, each woman received a combination of simvastatin and postmenopausal hormone therapy in the same dosage regimens as above."( Concurrent use of simvastatin and estrogen--progestin therapy compared with each therapy alone for hypercholesterolemia in postmenopausal women.
Darling, GM; Davis, SR; Johns, JA; McCloud, PI, 1999
)
0.85
" To evaluate this effect further, dose-response curves with noradrenaline were measured in the presence and absence of 20 micromol/l simvastatin, lovastatin, mevastatin and pravastatin."( Inhibition of smooth muscle cell calcium mobilization and aortic ring contraction by lactone vastatins.
Altieri, PI; Crespo, MJ; Escobales, N; Furilla, RA, 1996
)
0.5
"Neural networks have been used in diagnosing and treating many diseases, including the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and insulin dosing in diabetes mellitus."( A preliminary evaluation of neural network analysis for pharmacodynamic modeling of the dosing of the hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A-reductase inhibitors simvastatin and atorvastatin.
Moon, A; Smith, T, 2002
)
0.51
"The goal of this study was to develop a preliminary pharmacodynamic model for dosing of the hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA)-reductase inhibitors simvastatin and atorvastatin using neural network analysis."( A preliminary evaluation of neural network analysis for pharmacodynamic modeling of the dosing of the hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A-reductase inhibitors simvastatin and atorvastatin.
Moon, A; Smith, T, 2002
)
0.71
"A neural network model for the dosing of the HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors simvastatin and atorvastatin demonstrated an ability to predict appropriate dosing, but inclusion of other factors (eg, age, body weight, sex) and a larger sample size may be necessary for development of a more accurate model."( A preliminary evaluation of neural network analysis for pharmacodynamic modeling of the dosing of the hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A-reductase inhibitors simvastatin and atorvastatin.
Moon, A; Smith, T, 2002
)
0.74
"A micellar electrokinetic chromatographic (MEKC) method was developed for the quantification of lovastatin and simvastatin, cholesterol lowering agents in pharmaceutical dosage forms."( Determination of lovastatin and simvastatin in pharmaceutical dosage forms by MEKC.
Raju, AN; Reddy, GO; Srinivasu, MK, 2002
)
0.81
" However, atorvastatin had a different dose-response effect from simvastatin on both lipid parameters."( Dose-response effects of atorvastatin and simvastatin on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in hypercholesterolaemic patients: a review of five comparative studies.
Mikhailidis, DP; Wierzbicki, AS, 2002
)
0.82
" Seventeen per cent of the patients who were evaluated at 8 weeks increased the simvastatin dosage to 40 mg per day in the second month of treatment."( Dose-expanded study in the reinforcement of efficacy of simvastatin.
Vichayanrat, A, 2002
)
0.79
"To avoid severe myopathy, cyclosporine levels should be monitored sooner than weekly intervals and statins should be discontinued or their dosage should be reduced, as long as azoles need to be prescribed in transplant recipients."( Itraconazole-induced rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure in a heart transplant recipient treated with simvastatin and cyclosporine.
Alivizatos, PA; Chilidou, D; Manginas, A; Vlahakos, DV; Zamanika, C, 2002
)
0.53
" The first group was the original product (Zocor), dosage 10 mg, Lot No IC4/36(N) from Merck Sharp & Dohme Company and the second group was a generic product, dosage 10 mg, Lot No T05/080 and T06/109 from Unison Company."( A randomized crossover study to evaluate LDL-cholesterol lowering effect of a generic product of simvastatin (Unison Company) compared to simvastatin (Zocor) in hypercholesterolemic subjects.
Assawawitoontip, S; Wiwanitkit, V, 2002
)
0.53
"The simvastatin regimen for patients with a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) level at their established National Cholesterol Education Program goal was converted from daily dosing to double the daily dose given every other day for 8 weeks."( Daily dosing versus alternate-day dosing of simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Copher, HR; Stewart, RD, 2002
)
1.13
" The LDL-lowering effect of the daily dosing regimen was compared with that of the alternate-day dosing regimen."( Daily dosing versus alternate-day dosing of simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Copher, HR; Stewart, RD, 2002
)
0.58
"Alternate-day dosing of simvastatin may be an effective alternative to daily dosing."( Daily dosing versus alternate-day dosing of simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Copher, HR; Stewart, RD, 2002
)
0.88
" The four cases illustrate the importance of considering the potential for drug interactions and making appropriate dosage adjustments for renal insufficiency in patients receiving HMG CoA reductase therapy."( HMG CoA reductase-inhibitor-related myopathy and the influence of drug interactions.
Bagnall, F; Choy, T; Cordato, D; Dunn, R; Hitchens, N; Huynh, T; Johnstone, K; Yang, F,
)
0.13
" A clinical pharmacist was responsible for laboratory monitoring, patient counseling, and the initiation and dosage adjustment of an appropriate 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor (statin) using a dosing algorithm and monitoring guidelines."( A multidisciplinary program for achieving lipid goals in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Abbott, KC; McMillan, RJ; Sheikh, AM; Viola, RA; Welch, PG; Yuan, CM, 2002
)
0.31
" In addition, the low incidence of drug-related adverse events in this study may be also related to the low dosage of simvastatin."( Sustained reduction of serum cholesterol in low-dose 6-year simvastatin treatment with minimum side effects in 51,321 Japanese hypercholesterolemic patients.
Itakura, H; Kita, T; Mabuchi, H; Matsuzaki, M; Matsuzawa, Y; Nakaya, N; Oikawa, S; Saito, Y; Sasaki, J; Shimamoto, K, 2003
)
0.77
" According to baseline levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL)-C, girls and boys were divided into two groups, one group (with LDL-C <220 mg/dl) starting with a simvastatin dosage of 5 mg/day, the other (with LDL-C >220 mg/dl) 10 mg/day with the possibility to increase dosages up to a daily maximum of 20 mg, if not reaching LDL-C concentrations of <170 mg/dl within the first period."( The effect of low-dose simvastatin in children with familial hypercholesterolaemia: a 1-year observation.
Bucek, RA; Dirisamer, A; Hachemian, N; Reiter, M; Widhalm, K; Wolf, F, 2003
)
0.83
" Profiles of blood glucose concentration following repaglinide dosing were altered by less than 8% by both ketoconazole and rifampicin."( Influence of drugs interacting with CYP3A4 on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the prandial glucose regulator repaglinide.
Hansen, KT; Hatorp, V; Thomsen, MS, 2003
)
0.32
" It also indicates that the clinical dosage of simvastatin are relatively smaller than that for satisfactory lipid control in patients with acute coronary syndromes."( Lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of varying doses of Simvastatin in patients with early stage acute coronary syndromes: one-year follow-up study.
Cui, L; Gao, M; Hu, D; Liu, X; Wei, Y; Xu, Z; Yang, X; Zou, Y, 2003
)
0.82
"A 67-year-old man receiving a stable maintenance dosage of warfarin experienced an increased international normalized ratio (INR) without bleeding when his atorvastatin therapy was switched to fluvastatin."( Oral anticoagulant drug interactions with statins: case report of fluvastatin and review of the literature.
Andrus, MR, 2004
)
0.32
" In treatment B, subjects received a 160-mg micronized fenofibrate capsule in the morning for 7 days, followed by a 160-mg micronized fenofibrate capsule dosed together with an 80-mg simvastatin tablet on days 8 to 14."( Simvastatin does not have a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction with fenofibrate in humans.
Bergman, AJ; Burke, J; Hartford, A; He, W; Lasseter, KC; Liu, L; Murphy, G; Paolini, JF; Prueksaritanont, T; Qiu, Y; Valesky, R; Vega, JM; Zhao, JJ, 2004
)
1.96
" In both studies, simvastatin was generally well tolerated by all patients across the dosage range of 20 mg-80 mg."( Efficacy and safety of simvastatin in Asian and non-Asian coronary heart disease patients: a comparison of the GOALLS and STATT studies.
Bilheimer, D; Chung, N; Davies, MJ; Lee, K; Loeys, T; Morales, D; Sangwatanaroj, S; Shah, A; Yin, WH; Zhu, JR, 2004
)
0.97
" 10/10 mg, 10/20 mg, 10/40 mg, and 10/80 mg) and hence, the dosage may be adjusted to suit the individual patient's needs."( Ezetimibe/Simvastatin: a review of its use in the management of hypercholesterolemia.
Murdoch, D; Scott, LJ, 2004
)
0.73
"0 mg/day, dosage was dependent on an initial level of total cholesterol)."( The effect of simvastatin therapy on hemorheological profile in coronary heart desease (CHD) patients.
Muravyov, AV; Petrochenko, A; Surovaya, L; Yakusevich, VV, 2004
)
0.68
" Because of its long record of safety and demonstrated ability to reduce cardiovascular risk, simvastatin has recently become available without a prescription in the UK at the 10 mg dosage level."( Simvastatin: a review.
Pedersen, TR; Tobert, JA, 2004
)
1.99
" Next, using the quantitative in vivo angiogenesis ELISA, we generated dose-response curves for each compound."( Use of a monoclonal antibody specific for activated endothelial cells to quantitate angiogenesis in vivo in zebrafish after drug treatment.
Eng, K; Lee, J; McGrath, P; Seng, WL, 2004
)
0.32
" Instructions for dosage adjustment are seldom provided in the Japanese package inserts."( A literature search on pharmacokinetic drug interactions of statins and analysis of how such interactions are reflected in package inserts in Japan.
Hasegawa, R; Hirata-Koizumi, M; Miyake, S; Saito, M; Urano, T, 2005
)
0.33
" This was similar for both statins and was treatment-duration dependent, only occurring after 10 days had elapsed even if the dose was increased, and still occurring after this time when dosing was terminated earlier as a result of morbidity."( Statin-induced muscle necrosis in the rat: distribution, development, and fibre selectivity.
Bigley, A; Marsden, AM; Randall, K; Scott, RC; Westwood, FR, 2005
)
0.33
" Group I-treated with pravastatin, group II--with simvastatin--both drugs in a dosage of 40 mg/kg daily, 5 days/week for a total of 3 weeks."( Effect of pravastatin, simvastatin and atorvastatin on the phagocytic activity of mouse peritoneal macrophages.
Bergman, M; Bessler, H; Djaldetti, M; Salman, H, 2006
)
0.9
" On the day of the experiment the kidney was prepared for videomicroscopy and dose-response curves were done with acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside (10(-10) M to 10(-5) M) in simvastatin-fed rats ??(n=8) and control rats (n=13)."( Enhanced acetylcholine-induced dilation in afferent arterioles in simvastatin-fed rats.
Caprio, TW; Drummond, E; Entenman, K; Inman, SR; Mueller, M, 2006
)
0.76
" Simvastatin was administered, in both groups, at a dosage of 20 mg/day, while l-carnitine was administered at a dosage of 2g/day once daily."( Efficacy and tolerability of combined treatment with L-carnitine and simvastatin in lowering lipoprotein(a) serum levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Capurso, A; Capurso, C; Capurso, SA; Colacicco, AM; D'Introno, A; Fontana, C; Gadaleta, AM; Koverech, A; Panza, F; Solfrizzi, V; Torres, F, 2006
)
1.48
" No meaningful changes in the body weight were detected in all dosing groups compared to that of vehicle control group."( Hypolipemic effect of water extracts of Picrorrhiza rhizoma in PX-407 induced hyperlipemic ICR mouse model with hepatoprotective effects: a prevention study.
Ahn, HC; Ku, SK; Lee, HS, 2006
)
0.33
"We searched Medline, the international medical database, to conduct a systematic review of the literature on the efficacy and tolerability of statins in CKD and renal transplant patients and on specific recommendations for dosage adjustments in this population."( [Statins in patients with kidney failure: efficacy, tolerance, and prescription guidelines in patients with chronic kidney disease and renal transplant].
Deray, G; Isnard-Bagnis, C; Karie, S; Launay-Vacher, V, 2006
)
0.33
" Although most statins are not excreted by the kidneys, the dosage of some must be adapted in CKD patients because of pharmacokinetic modifications induced by renal impairment."( [Statins in patients with kidney failure: efficacy, tolerance, and prescription guidelines in patients with chronic kidney disease and renal transplant].
Deray, G; Isnard-Bagnis, C; Karie, S; Launay-Vacher, V, 2006
)
0.33
"The lowest and highest dosage strengths of EZE/SIMVA tablet were bioequivalent to the individual drug components administered together."( Bioequivalence of an ezetimibe/simvastatin combination tablet and coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin as separate tablets in healthy subjects.
Bergman, A; Gambale, J; Gottesdiener, K; Groff, M; Hreniuk, D; Johnson-Levonas, AO; Kosoglou, T; Lasseter, KC; Laurent, A; Liu, L; Matthews, N; Migoya, EM; Murphy, G; Musson, DG; Paolini, JF; Riffel, K; Roadcap, B; Statkevich, P; Valesky, R; Yi, B; Zhao, JJ, 2006
)
0.62
"Physicians' and pharmacists' ability to correctly identify three commonly used oral dosage forms was assessed."( Ability of practitioners to identify solid oral dosage tablets.
Bates, DW; Bult, J; Kim, S; Schiff, GD; Seger, AC, 2006
)
0.33
" Participants were also asked about their experiences and views on current resources and alternatives for identifying oral dosage forms."( Ability of practitioners to identify solid oral dosage tablets.
Bates, DW; Bult, J; Kim, S; Schiff, GD; Seger, AC, 2006
)
0.33
" Overall, 77% expressed dissatisfaction with the current system and 91% favored a universal imprint coding system for oral dosage forms."( Ability of practitioners to identify solid oral dosage tablets.
Bates, DW; Bult, J; Kim, S; Schiff, GD; Seger, AC, 2006
)
0.33
" Differential pulse and square wave voltammetric methods for the quantitative determination of SMV in pharmaceutical dosage forms and spiked serum samples were developed based on the linear relationship between the peak current and the concentration."( Determination of the antihyperlipidemic simvastatin by various voltammetric techniques in tablets and serum samples.
Coruh, O; Ozkan, SA, 2006
)
0.6
" After 14 days of dosing to achieve steady state, no significant differences were found in either the extent (AUC(tau)) or rate (Cmax) of exposure to simvastatin or its major beta-hydroxy metabolite after coadministration of P-OM3 with simvastatin compared with administration of simvastatin alone."( Study of the pharmacokinetic interaction between simvastatin and prescription omega-3-acid ethyl esters.
Di Spirito, M; Doyle, R; Kling, D; McKenney, JM; Pantaleon, C; Shalwitz, RA; Swearingen, D, 2006
)
0.79
"Although previous studies have demonstrated that various "statins" decrease levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), the dose-response relation for lowering hs-CRP by the clinically important drug simvastatin compared with lipid lowering is unclear."( Comparison of effects of high (80 mg) versus low (20 mg) dose of simvastatin on C-reactive protein and lipoproteins in patients with angiographic evidence of coronary arterial narrowing.
Anderson, JL; Horne, BD; Lappe, DL; Maycock, CA; Meredith, KG; Muhlestein, JB; Pearson, RR, 2007
)
0.76
" The steady-state pharmacokinetics of valsartan, simvastatin beta-hydroxy acid (active metabolite of simvastatin) and simvastatin (pro-drug) were determined on day 7 of each dosing period."( Evaluation of a pharmacokinetic interaction between valsartan and simvastatin in healthy subjects.
Humbert, H; Pommier, F; Prasad, P; Reynolds, CV; Sunkara, G; Yeh, C, 2007
)
0.83
"Based on the wide therapeutic dosage ranges of valsartan and simvastatin, and the highly variable pharmacokinetics of three analytes, the observed differences in the exposure and C(max) of valsartan, simvastatin beta-hydroxy acid and simvastatin in the combination treatment are unlikely to be of clinical relevance."( Evaluation of a pharmacokinetic interaction between valsartan and simvastatin in healthy subjects.
Humbert, H; Pommier, F; Prasad, P; Reynolds, CV; Sunkara, G; Yeh, C, 2007
)
0.82
" Statins were replaced with an equal dosage of fluvastatin."( Fluvastatin as co-medication in heart transplant recipients with elevated creatine-kinase.
Delgado, O; Kaczmarek, I; Meiser, B; Reichart, B; Sadoni, S; Schmöckel, M, 2007
)
0.34
" The decline in motor functions associated with scrapie infection was delayed in mice receiving (1 mg/kg) simvastatin, a dosage used to treat hypercholesterolemia in humans."( Simvastatin treatment prolongs the survival of scrapie-infected mice.
Bate, C; Kempster, S; Williams, A, 2007
)
2
" Canadian data on statin dosing were combined with efficacy data from a published meta-analysis to determine the proportion of patients who would be expected to achieve LDL-C targets after treatment with atorvastatin or generic simvastatin."( A model for assessing the cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin and simvastatin in achieving Canadian low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets.
Lachaine, J; Merikle, E; Montpetit, M; Rinfret, S; Tarride, JE, 2007
)
0.76
" This has lead to a series of international and national recommendations for a further reduction in target values for LDL-cholesterol, which is often difficult to achieve with the usual dosage of statins."( [Dual inhibition of cholesterol using the drug combination ezetimibe/simvastatin?].
Vaverková, H, 2007
)
0.57
" The results suggest that the effect of hydrophobic statins on the engulfing capacity of human peripheral blood phagocytes and apoptosis is dependent on their dosage and physiochemical properties."( Hydrophobic but not hydrophilic statins enhance phagocytosis and decrease apoptosis of human peripheral blood cells in vitro.
Bergman, M; Bessler, H; Djaldetti, M; Salman, H, 2008
)
0.35
" The proposed method can be useful in the quality control of bulk manufacturing and pharmaceutical dosage forms."( Stability-indicating reversed-phase liquid chromatographic method for simultaneous determination of simvastatin and ezetimibe from their combination drug products.
Chaudhari, BG; Patel, NM; Shah, PB,
)
0.35
" By blocking both synthesis and absorption of cholesterol, the fixed combination exerts a cholesterol-lowering effect as important as, or even greater than, that observed with the highest dosage of simvastatin and other statins, with a good tolerance profile."( [Drug of the month. Ezetimibe/simvastatin tablet (Inegy)].
Radermecker, RP; Scheen, AJ, 2007
)
0.82
" Our objective was to explore how differences in prevalences of use, dosing characteristics, choice of statin and continuity of therapy in individual patients adds new information to previous results."( Aspects of statin prescribing in Norwegian counties with high, average and low statin consumption - an individual-level prescription database study.
Eggen, AE; Engeland, A; Furu, K; Hartz, I; Njølstad, I; Sakshaug, S; Skurtveit, S, 2007
)
0.34
"A reversed-phase liquid chromatographic (LC) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of ezetimibe and simvastatin in pharmaceutical dosage forms."( Simultaneous liquid chromatographic determination of ezetimibe and simvastatin in pharmaceutical products.
Barth, T; Dalmora, SL; Oliveira, PR; Todeschini, V,
)
0.57
"To target drug release and to assess regional gastrointestinal absorption of the CYP 3A substrate simvastatin from the distal parts of the intestine, delayed release film coated tableted oral dosage forms were developed."( Pharmacokinetics of the CYP 3A substrate simvastatin following administration of delayed versus immediate release oral dosage forms.
Amidon, GL; Hilfinger, JM; Kijek, P; Kim, JS; Langguth, P; Staubach, P; Tubic-Grozdanis, M, 2008
)
0.83
" The overall metabolite levels from the immediate release capsules tended to be higher throughout the period studied than the metabolite levels following administration of Zocor and simvastatin delayed release dosage form."( Pharmacokinetics of the CYP 3A substrate simvastatin following administration of delayed versus immediate release oral dosage forms.
Amidon, GL; Hilfinger, JM; Kijek, P; Kim, JS; Langguth, P; Staubach, P; Tubic-Grozdanis, M, 2008
)
0.8
" Unlike the majority of pharmacists, most GPs thought that current dosing guidelines were inappropriate, but there was consensus that long-term nonadherence would probably curtail any treatment benefit."( Lifestyle or life-saving medicines? A primary healthcare professional and consumer opinion survey on over-the-counter statins.
Greenfield, SM; Kountouri, M; Marshall, T; Vamvakopoulos, JE, 2008
)
0.35
" Patients were randomized to an 8- or 12-week niacin titration scheme to a maximum NER/S dosage of 2,000/40 mg/day."( Long-term safety and efficacy of a combination of niacin extended release and simvastatin in patients with dyslipidemia: the OCEANS study.
Bajorunas, DR; Davidson, MH; Karas, RH; Kashyap, ML; Keller, LH; Knopp, RH, 2008
)
0.57
" Statin dosage should be judiciously monitored in patients who are diabetic or are at risk of developing other forms of proliferative retinopathy."( The pleiotropic effects of simvastatin on retinal microvascular endothelium has important implications for ischaemic retinopathies.
Devine, AB; Gardiner, TA; Medina, RJ; O'Neill, CL; Stitt, AW, 2008
)
0.64
"A dosing algorithm including genetic (VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes) and nongenetic factors (age, weight, therapeutic indication, and cotreatment with amiodarone or simvastatin) explained 51% of the variance in stable weekly warfarin doses in 390 patients attending an anticoagulant clinic in a Brazilian public hospital."( Pharmacogenetics of warfarin: development of a dosing algorithm for brazilian patients.
Dias-Neto, E; Ojopi, EB; Perini, JA; Rangel, F; Santana, IS; Silva-Assunção, E; Struchiner, CJ; Suarez-Kurtz, G, 2008
)
0.54
"Eligible patients had a 6-month period of no statin use prior to the initial statin prescription, an initial statin dosage of either 20 or 40 mg of simvastatin or 10 or 20 mg of atorvastatin (the most commonly used doses of both drugs), a 0 to 3-month 'qualifying period' after the first prescription to allow for varying minimum lengths of statin use, and no statin switches."( Differences in cardiovascular event rates between atorvastatin and simvastatin among new users: managed-care experience.
Vogel, RA; Willke, RJ; Zhou, S, 2008
)
0.78
"The authors conducted a prospective, controlled, open-label trial examining the effectiveness and safety of high-dose fluvastatin or a standard dosage of simvastatin plus ezetimibe, both with an intensive guideline-oriented cardiac rehabilitation program, in achieving the new ATP III LDL-C targets in patients with proven coronary artery disease."( Simvastatin and ezetimibe in addition to nonpharmacological risk factor modification for achieving new low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets.
Abdel-Wahab, M; Geist, V; Herrmann, L; Khattab, AA; Liska, B; Richardt, G; Tölg, R; Westphal, R, 2008
)
1.99
" The direct application of study observations to clinical practice is limited by patient selection criteria and dosage regime, which randomly applied relatively high doses rather than titration which often occurs in clinical practice."( Long-term (48-week) safety of ezetimibe 10 mg/day coadministered with simvastatin compared to simvastatin alone in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.
Bays, H; Capece, R; Liu, J; Sapre, A; Taggart, W; Tershakovec, A, 2008
)
0.58
" The initial dose administered to patients in the extension was ezetimibe 10 mg coadministered with simvastatin 10 mg with the option to up-titrate statin dosage if LDL-C goals were not met."( Long-term safety and tolerability of ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients: a randomized, 12-month double-blind extension study.
Hanson, ME; Strony, J; Veltri, EP; Yang, B, 2008
)
0.8
" dosing with SV alone."( Effect of oral ketoconazole on oral and intravenous pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and its acid in cynomolgus monkeys.
Fukuzaki, K; Kume, T; Nii, K; Ogasawara, A; Ueda, A; Utoh, M; Yoshikawa, T, 2009
)
0.59
" Animals were dosed daily with 80 mg kg(-1) day(-1) simvastatin for 4 (n = 6) and 12 days (n = 5), 88 mg kg(-1) day(-1) simvastatin for 12 days (n = 4), or vehicle (0."( Blunted Akt/FOXO signalling and activation of genes controlling atrophy and fuel use in statin myopathy.
Constantin-Teodosiu, D; Greenhaff, PL; Mallinson, JE; Sidaway, J; Westwood, FR, 2009
)
0.6
"The drugs were given to the diabetic rats for 2 weeks; oxidative stress was measured by dosage of total plasma antioxidant capacity (TRAP) and malondialdehyde (MDA)."( [Effects of ramipril and simvastatin on the oxidative stress of diabetic rats].
Barbosa, DS; Delfino, VD; Elias, JA; Fabris, BA; Matsuo, T, 2008
)
0.65
"022) compared with no treatment, and there was an apparent dose-response effect with the lowest levels of total testosterone seen in men treated with >or=20 mg atorvastatin (9."( Statin therapy is associated with lower total but not bioavailable or free testosterone in men with type 2 diabetes.
Channer, KS; Jones, TH; Kapoor, D; Stanworth, RD, 2009
)
0.35
" In a case of predisposition to RML statin therapy and dosage can only be performed under continuous supervision."( [Maximal initial dose of simvastatin causing acute renal failure through rhabdomyolysis: risk factors, pathomechanism and therapy related to a case].
Al-Hadad, A; Deme, D; Rakonczai, E; Sándor, K; Szántó, E; Varga, T, 2009
)
0.66
" The aims of this pilot study were to find the dosage and short-term efficacy of simvastatin and potential adverse events in children with chronic kidney diseases."( Efficacy of simvastatin in children with hyperlipidemia secondary to kidney disorders.
Arredondo-García, JL; Bojorquez-Ochoa, A; García-de-la-Puente, S; Gutiérrez-Castrellón, P; Maya, ER; Pérez-Martínez, Mdel P, 2009
)
0.96
" The effects of simvastatins based on different methods of administration, dosage and carriers were also described."( The use of simvastatin in bone regeneration.
Park, JB, 2009
)
1.09
" The impact of T2 on the dose-response to IGF-I (0, 3, 10 and 30 ng/mL) was also evaluated; T2 blunted the stimulatory effect of 3-30 ng/mL of IGF-I on steroid production and cell proliferation."( Effects of a trichothecene, T-2 toxin, on proliferation and steroid production by porcine granulosa cells.
Caloni, F; Cremonesi, F; Ranzenigo, G; Spicer, LJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Test substances (either simvastatin low- or high dosed or BMP-2) were incorporated into a biodegradable layer of poly(d,l-lactide)."( Simvastatin locally applied from a biodegradable coating of osteosynthetic implants improves fracture healing comparable to BMP-2 application.
Haas, NP; Luttosch, F; Morawski, M; Pauly, S; Schmidmaier, G; Wildemann, B, 2009
)
2.1
" The observation that simvastatin inhibited the apoptosis of HG-treated LECs in its therapeutic concentration suggests that daily dosage of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor used by diabetic patients may increase PCO formation."( Apoptosis of lens epithelial cells induced by high concentration of glucose is associated with a decrease in caveolin-1 levels.
Jin, C; Yao, K; Zhang, Z, 2009
)
0.67
" The practical opportunity to reduce the risk of acute vascular events, improvement of vascular endothelium function and relative safety of application of the preparation in the specified dosage at persons of senile age is shown."( [Pleiotropic effects of small dozes simvastatin in patients of senile age with chronic heart failure].
Al'tman, DA; Davydova, EV; Ermak, EM; Pirogov, AL, 2009
)
0.63
"5 mg/dl) mainly regardless of previous statin therapy (rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, and lovastatin) and dosing (pooled median values)."( [Achievement of blood lipid target levels with Ezetimibe/Simvastatin in patients with atherosclerosis and/or diabetes mellitus--an Austrian observational study].
Slany, J, 2009
)
0.82
" The Entero-Test was used to collect bile from six fasted dogs that had been dosed either orally with simvastatin (SV) or intravenously with simvastatin hydroxy acid (SVA), compounds that have been previously reported to undergo extensive metabolism and biliary secretion in the dog."( Use of the entero-test, a novel approach for the noninvasive capture of biliary metabolites in dogs.
Beaumont, C; Guiney, WJ; Thomas, SR, 2010
)
0.58
" Patients switched to an equivalent simvastatin dose had lower LDL-C levels and were more likely to achieve LDL-C targets than patients switched to a non-equivalent dose, suggesting physicians must consider dosage equivalence when switching statins, and should measure LDL-C and titrate statins as necessary to achieve LDL-C control."( LDL-C goal attainment in patients who remain on atorvastatin or switch to equivalent or non-equivalent doses of simvastatin: a retrospective matched cohort study in clinical practice.
Burke, JP; Rublee, DA, 2010
)
0.85
" Multivariate analysis showed that statin dosage was independently associated with MD (OR:1."( Mitochondrial dysfunction induced by statin contributes to endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease.
Chan, HT; Dai, YL; Fong, B; Lau, CP; Lee, SW; Li, SW; Luk, TH; Siu, CW; Tam, S; Tse, HF; Yiu, KH, 2010
)
0.36
" Eight male subjects (BMI 25 +/- 3 kg/m(2)) with mild hypercholesterolemia (LDL cholesterol 135 +/- 30 mg/dL) and normal triglycerides (111 +/- 44 mg/dL) were examined under no treatment (A), under chronic treatment with simvastatin 40 mg/day (B) and after an acute-on-chronic dosage of 80 mg simvastatin under chronic simvastatin treatment (C)."( Influence of simvastatin on apoB-100 secretion in non-obese subjects with mild hypercholesterolemia.
Barrett, PH; Berthold, HK; Birnbaum, J; Brämswig, S; Gouni-Berthold, I; Mertens, J; Sudhop, T; von Bergmann, K, 2010
)
0.91
" Furthermore, the following trends of interest were calculated for each calendar year: the percentage of statin users prescribed simvastatin or atorvastatin, the median dose of simvastatin and atorvastatin prescribed, and the percentage of simvastatin users prescribed a dosage of 40 mg/day (which is recommended by the Dutch multidisciplinary guideline)."( Statin prescribing in the elderly in the Netherlands: a pharmacy database time trend study.
Geleedst-De Vooght, M; Jansen, P; Maitland-van der Zee, AH; Mantel-Teeuwisse, A; Schalekamp, T, 2010
)
0.57
"To explore if non-concurrent amlodipine dosing results in less drug interaction, the pharmacokinetic profiles, safety and efficacy endpoints were assessed following repeated doses of simvastatin, co-administered concurrently or non-concurrently with amlodipine in patients with coexisting hypertension and hyperlipidemia."( Non-concurrent dosing attenuates the pharmacokinetic interaction between amlodipine and simvastatin.
Choi, JW; Kim, SH; Lee, H; Lee, SJ; Lim, HE; Park, CG, 2010
)
0.77
"The Cmax and AUClast and of simvastatin acid in the non-concurrent amlodipine dosing group were 63."( Non-concurrent dosing attenuates the pharmacokinetic interaction between amlodipine and simvastatin.
Choi, JW; Kim, SH; Lee, H; Lee, SJ; Lim, HE; Park, CG, 2010
)
0.88
"Non-concurrent dosing may be a useful and safe therapeutic option for patients who require two or more drugs administered concomitantly, but who are likely to develop unwanted drug interactions."( Non-concurrent dosing attenuates the pharmacokinetic interaction between amlodipine and simvastatin.
Choi, JW; Kim, SH; Lee, H; Lee, SJ; Lim, HE; Park, CG, 2010
)
0.58
" These results suggest that more research needs to be done to fully ascertain the therapeutic potential and optimal dosing paradigm of a post-ischemic treatment with a statin."( Comparison of the post-embolization effects of tissue-plasminogen activator and simvastatin on neurological outcome in a clinically relevant rat model of acute ischemic stroke.
Guluma, KZ; Lapchak, PA, 2010
)
0.59
"Two spectrophotometric methods are presented for the simultaneous determination of ezetimibe/simvastatin and ezetimibe/atorvastatin binary mixtures in combined pharmaceutical dosage forms without prior separation."( Enhanced spectrophotometric determination of two antihyperlipidemic mixtures containing ezetimibe in pharmaceutical preparations.
Barary, MA; El-Kimary, EI; Hassan, EM; Maher, HM; Youssef, RM, 2011
)
0.59
" The dosage administrated were 250 mg niacin-ER plus 10 mg SV in the first two weeks, 500 mg/20 mg in the next two weeks, and 750 mg/20 mg in the final four weeks."( Effects of low-dose of niacin associated to simvastatin in the treatment of mixed dyslipidemia Salgad.
Casulari, LA; Dos Santos, AM; Salgado, BJ; Salgado, JV, 2010
)
0.62
"A 63-year-old man with a history of chronic renal impairment on a stable dosage of simvastatin developed rhabdomyolysis after the addition of ranolazine to his medication regimen."( Rhabdomyolysis in a patient receiving ranolazine and simvastatin.
Ezekiel, TO; Hylton, AC, 2010
)
0.84
" The decrease can be prevented by the suggested dosage scheme."( Use of ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to demonstrate decreased serum statin levels after extracorporeal LDL-cholesterol elimination.
Bláha, M; Bláha, V; Lánská, M; Malý, J; Nováková, L; Solich, P; Solichová, D; Vlcková, H, 2011
)
0.37
" On post burn day 7 cecal ligation and puncture with a 21-gauge needle (CLP) was performed under ketamine/xylazine anesthesia, the two different dosing schedules were continued and survival was monitored."( Simvastatin treatment improves survival in a murine model of burn sepsis: Role of interleukin 6.
Beffa, DC; Carter, EA; Fagan, SP; Fischman, AJ; Hamrahi, VF; Kaneki, M; Paul, KW; Tompkins, RG; Yu, YM, 2011
)
1.81
"Simple, accurate, sensitive, and precise UV spectrophotometric, chemometric, and HPLC methods were developed for simultaneous determination of a two-component drug mixture of ezetimibe (EZ) and simvastatin (SM) in laboratory-prepared mixtures and a combined tablet dosage form."( Quantitative analysis of the cholesterol-lowering drugs ezetimibe and simvastatin in pure powder, binary mixtures, and a combined dosage form by spectrophotometry, chemometry, and high-performance column liquid chromatography.
Aboul Alamein, AM; Hegazy, MA; Lotfy, HM,
)
0.55
"Numerous metabolites of simvastatin were detected, and the major metabolites were consistent with those reported from studies where bile was collected using invasive techniques from patients dosed with [(14) C]-simvastatin."( Use of Entero-Test, a simple approach for non-invasive clinical evaluation of the biliary disposition of drugs.
Beaumont, C; Guiney, WJ; Koch, A; McHugh, SM; Richards, D; Robertson, DC; Thomas, SR, 2011
)
0.68
" The objectives of the present study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model for simvastatin and to evaluate its usefulness in predicting the dose-response relationship of simvastatin in patients with hyperlipidaemia."( A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for simvastatin that predicts low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol reduction in patients with primary hyperlipidaemia.
Ahn, BJ; Chae, HS; Choi, J; Doh, K; Han, S; Jun, YK; Kim, J; Lee, YW; Yim, DS, 2011
)
0.83
" To optimize the dose regimens of these inducers for use in DDI studies, their effect at various doses and dosing durations on the area under the curve (AUC) of multiple probe substrates was simulated using a population-based simulator."( Simulation of clinical drug-drug interactions from hepatocyte CYP3A4 induction data and its potential utility in trial designs.
Hayashi, M; Shou, M; Skiles, GL; Xu, Y; Zhou, Y, 2011
)
0.37
" Simvastatin was discontinued and dosage of cholinesterase inhibitor was temporarily increased."( Statin-associated myasthenic weakness.
Pasutharnchat, N; Phanthumchinda, K, 2011
)
1.28
" The incidence ofstatin-associated myasthenic weakness should be clearly investigated Challenge with other brands of statin or with reduced dosage is not beneficial in these patients."( Statin-associated myasthenic weakness.
Pasutharnchat, N; Phanthumchinda, K, 2011
)
0.37
"Data were pooled from eight NER studies (administered as NER with a maximum dosage of 1000, 1500, and 2000 mg/day, either as monotherapy or in combination with simvastatin 20 or 40 mg/day [NER/S], or lovastatin 20 or 40 mg/day [NER/L]) to evaluate rates of study discontinuation due to flushing or any treatment-related adverse events."( Niacin extended-release therapy in phase III clinical trials is associated with relatively low rates of drug discontinuation due to flushing and treatment-related adverse events: a pooled analysis.
Brinton, EA; Jiang, P; Kashyap, ML; Padley, RJ; Thakkar, RB; Vo, AN, 2011
)
0.57
" We proposed a systematic classification scheme using FDA-approved drug labeling to assess the DILI potential of drugs, which yielded a benchmark dataset with 287 drugs representing a wide range of therapeutic categories and daily dosage amounts."( FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
Chen, M; Fang, H; Liu, Z; Shi, Q; Tong, W; Vijay, V, 2011
)
0.37
"9% saline (control group) or lipid emulsion (high fat group) at the daily dosage of 15 ml/kg body weight, respectively."( Effects of simvastatin on apolipoprotein M in vivo and in vitro.
Berggren-Söderlund, M; Luo, G; Mao, S; Nilsson-Ehle, P; Wei, J; Xu, N; Zhang, X, 2011
)
0.76
" Evening dosing resulted in significant dose-dependent improvement in latency to persistent sleep, total sleep time and wake after sleep onset as measured by polysomnography."( Phase I studies on the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of SB-649868, a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist.
Alexander, R; Bettica, P; Gomeni, R; Nucci, G; Pyke, C; Ratti, E; Squassante, L; Zamuner, S, 2012
)
0.38
"The aim of this study was to explore the influence of simvastatin dosing time, variable compliance and circadian cholesterol production on the reduction of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)."( The influence of dosing time, variable compliance and circadian low-density lipoprotein production on the effect of simvastatin: simulations from a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model.
Al-Sallami, HS; Duffull, SB; Pavan Kumar, VV; Wright, DF, 2011
)
0.83
" No subject discontinued dosing due to adverse events."( Open-label phase 1b pilot study to assess the antiviral efficacy of simvastatin combined with sertraline in chronic hepatitis C patients.
Altmeyer, R; Cheng, CW; Chopra, N; Lawitz, E; Lim, SG; McHutchison, JG; Patel, K; Randle, JC; Tillmann, HL, 2011
)
0.6
" However, at these dosage levels HDL-cholesterol showed respective percent increase of 42, 48 and 53."( Lipid lowering effect of Cinnamomum zeylanicum in hyperlipidaemic albino rabbits.
Ahmad, M; Aslam, B; Faisal, I; Javed, I; Khan, MZ; Muhammad, F; Rahman, Z; Shahzadi, A, 2012
)
0.38
" To facilitate translation to clinical practice, we now characterize the optimal statin and dosing paradigm in murine models of ICH and TBI."( Statins improve outcome in murine models of intracranial hemorrhage and traumatic brain injury: a translational approach.
Dawson, HN; Indraswari, F; James, ML; Kernagis, D; Laskowitz, DT; Lei, B; Wang, H; Warner, DS, 2012
)
0.38
"The dose-response of the pleiotropic effects of statins on airway inflammation has not yet been established and may differ from that of their cholesterol-lowering effects."( Simvastatin delivery via inhalation attenuates airway inflammation in a murine model of asthma.
Cao, R; Dong, XW; Jiang, JX; Li, FF; Shen, HJ; Shen, LL; Sun, Y; Xie, QM; Xu, L; Yao, HY, 2012
)
1.82
" In rhesus monkeys, subcutaneous (SC) dosing of 1B20 dose-dependently induces robust LDL-C lowering (maximal ~70%), which is correlated with increases in target engagement and total antibody-bound PCSK9 levels."( An anti-PCSK9 antibody reduces LDL-cholesterol on top of a statin and suppresses hepatocyte SREBP-regulated genes.
An, Z; Ansbro, F; Blom, D; Chilewski, S; Chin, J; Condra, JH; Cumiskey, AM; Ernst, R; Geoghagen, N; Hammond, H; Hampton, R; Hansen, BC; Haytko, P; Huang, L; Hubbard, B; Jensen, K; Johns, DG; Lewis, D; McCabe, T; Mendoza, V; Mitnaul, LJ; Ni, YG; Pandit, S; Pellacani, A; Peterson, LB; Plump, AS; Rosa, R; Shen, X; Sitlani, A; Sparrow, CP; Strack, AM; Strohl, W; Wang, F; Wang, W; Wietecha, K; Wisniewski, D; Wood, D; Zhang, L; Zhao, JZ; Zhu, L, 2012
)
0.38
" The strong inductive effect of TNF-α on VCAM-1 was counteracted by simvastatin and shear stress in an additive dose-response dependent way."( Effect of shear stress, statins and TNF-α on hemostatic genes in human endothelial cells.
Bergh, N; Jern, S; Larsson, P; Ulfhammer, E, 2012
)
0.61
" Patients were stratified according to statin and dosage to identify against-label combination use (e."( Persistent use of against-label statin-fibrate combinations from 2003-2009 despite United States Food and Drug Administration dose restrictions.
Alford, JC; Allen, RR; Nair, KV; Saseen, JJ, 2012
)
0.38
"2%, usually atorvastatin), or increasing atorvastatin dosage (59."( Effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy with statins for secondary prevention of atherosclerosis--guidelines vs. reality.
Bożentowicz-Wikarek, M; Chudek, J; Kocełak, P; Olszanecka-Glinianowicz, M; Smertka, M, 2012
)
0.38
"In the absence of clinical studies, the ability to project the direction and the magnitude of changes in bioavailability of drug therapy, using evidence-based mechanistic pharmacokinetic in silico models would be of significant value in guiding prescribers to make the necessary adjustments to dosage regimens for an increasing population of patients who are undergoing bariatric surgery."( A mechanistic pharmacokinetic model to assess modified oral drug bioavailability post bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients: interplay between CYP3A gut wall metabolism, permeability and dissolution.
Ammori, BJ; Ashcroft, DM; Darwich, AS; Jamei, M; Pade, D; Rostami-Hodjegan, A, 2012
)
0.38
" This study shows a simple and fast method validation by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography in the linear range 28 to 52 µg/mL to quantify lovastatin, pravastatin sodium or simvastatin in bulk drug or dosage forms."( Development and validation of a simple and fast HPLC method for determination of lovastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin.
de Oliveira, RB; Oliveira, MA; Silva, TD; Vianna-Soares, CD, 2012
)
0.78
"Muscular symptoms associated with average dosage statin therapy are more frequent than in clinical trials and have a greater impact on patients' life than usually thought."( Discontinuation of statin therapy due to muscular side effects: a survey in real life.
Bruckert, E; Dallongeville, J; Rosenbaum, D; Sabouret, P, 2013
)
0.39
" There may be a direct relationship between the dosage of wenxiao II decoction and its therapeutic efficacy."( Effects of Wenxiao II decoction on the expression of MCP-1 and VCAM-1 in atherosclerotic rabbits.
Huo, QP; Liu, HY; Wang, YX, 2012
)
0.38
" Thus, most exigent phase of drug development practice particularly for oral dosage forms is the enhancement of drug solubility and thereby its oral bioavailability."( Solubility enhancement of simvastatin: a review.
Murtaza, G,
)
0.43
" The main objective is to improve solubility of simvastatin beta-CD complex (1:2) by co-precipitation method and then to deliver the same in sustained release dosage form."( Preparation and statistical optimization of alginate based stomach specific floating microcapsules of simvastatin.
Barik, BB; Premchandani, TA,
)
0.6
" The justifications and benefits of combination therapy are far-reaching, including but not limited to addressing unmet medical needs such as cancer, malaria, and HIV/AIDS, improved clinical efficacy and safety with reduced dosage of a single medication, understanding the underlying science of the disease, alleviating pharmaco-economic impacts, and better drug life-cycle management."( A case study of single-pill combination therapy: the ezetimibe/simvastatin combination for treatment of hyperlipidemia.
Chen, DY; Huang, X, 2012
)
0.62
"014) compared to the dosing of two capsules of (dose equivalent) 75% drug-loaded SNEDDS."( Supersaturated self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (Super-SNEDDS) enhance the bioavailability of the poorly water-soluble drug simvastatin in dogs.
Garmer, M; Holm, R; Karlsson, JJ; Müllertz, A; Rades, T; Thomas, N, 2013
)
0.59
" An additional aim is to assess the effect of the polypill on LDL-c and BP compared to the administration of separate pills of identically dosed components of the polypill."( The evening versus morning polypill utilization study: the TEMPUS rationale and design.
Bots, ML; Grobbee, DE; Lafeber, M; Rodgers, A; Spiering, W; Thom, S; Visseren, FL; Webster, R, 2014
)
0.4
"5 mg) in the evening; (2) the polypill in the morning; and (3) the use of the identically dosed agents in separate pills taken at different time points during the day."( The evening versus morning polypill utilization study: the TEMPUS rationale and design.
Bots, ML; Grobbee, DE; Lafeber, M; Rodgers, A; Spiering, W; Thom, S; Visseren, FL; Webster, R, 2014
)
0.4
" Moreover, inappropriate statin dosing restrictions (underdosing of simvastatin and lovastatin) were deliberately utilized in PLATO, potentially contributing to the beneficial effect of ticagrelor."( Exploring the ticagrelor-statin interplay in the PLATO trial.
Dinicolantonio, JJ; Serebruany, VL, 2013
)
0.63
" Without the appropriate dosage of simvastatin, the therapeutic effects on bone growth will be significantly reduced."( The effectiveness of the controlled release of simvastatin from β-TCP macrosphere in the treatment of OVX mice.
Ben-Nissan, B; Chou, J; Ito, T; Milthorpe, B; Otsuka, M, 2016
)
0.97
" The results showed that a major component of the cytotoxicity of therapeutic levels of etoposide is mediated by gap junctions composed of connexin 43(Cx43) and simvastatin at the dosage which does not induce cytotoxicity enhances etoposide toxicity by increasing gap junction coupling."( Simvastatin-induced up-regulation of gap junctions composed of connexin 43 sensitize Leydig tumor cells to etoposide: an involvement of PKC pathway.
Fu, Y; Peng, J; Tao, L; Wang, L; Wang, Q; Wu, D; Xu, C; Yu, M, 2013
)
2.03
" Most of the patients on more potent statins were not advised by their cardiologists to change the type or dosage of statin, which was more common in patients on less potent statins."( Prevalence and types of persistent dyslipidemia in patients treated with statins.
Reiner, Ž; Tedeschi-Reiner, E, 2013
)
0.39
" The results were better in patients treated with more potent statins and cardiologists advised them much less frequently to change the type and dosage of statin."( Prevalence and types of persistent dyslipidemia in patients treated with statins.
Reiner, Ž; Tedeschi-Reiner, E, 2013
)
0.39
"Flexibility in the recommended dosing time for a statin may improve patient compliance."( Efficacy and safety of morning versus evening dose of controlled-release simvastatin tablets in patients with hyperlipidemia: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase III trial.
Cho, SW; Han, KR; Hoon Park, S; Hyun, MS; Kim, MK; Kim, SH; Kim, YK; Seo, HS, 2013
)
0.62
" We leveraged electronic medical records (EMRs) to extract potency (ED50) and efficacy (Emax) of statin dose-response curves and tested them for association with 144 preselected variants."( Characterization of statin dose response in electronic medical records.
Berg, RL; Davis, RL; Denny, JC; Feng, Q; Iwuchukwu, OF; Jiang, L; Jiang, M; Krauss, RM; McCarty, CA; Nickerson, DA; Peissig, PL; Roden, DM; Rotter, JI; Waitara, MS; Wei, WQ; Wilke, RA; Xu, H, 2014
)
0.4
"Simvastatin has low aqueous solubility resulting in low oral bioavailability (5%) and thus presents a challenge in formulating a suitable dosage form."( Preparation and characterization of Simvastatin solid dispersion using skimmed milk.
Banerjee, SK; Behera, AL; Gaikwad, DD; Harer, SL; Sonar, PA, 2015
)
2.13
" Patients prescribed simvastatin before June 8, 2011, requiring dosage adjustment based on labeling changes were evaluated for study inclusion."( Impact of pharmacists' interventions and simvastatin dose restrictions.
Barlow, PB; Farland, MZ; Franks, AS; Shoulders, BR; Williams, JD, 2014
)
0.99
"Following FDA labeling changes for simvastatin, patient-specific recommendations made by pharmacists correlated with a greater likelihood of appropriate simvastatin dosing compared with a one-time didactic education session."( Impact of pharmacists' interventions and simvastatin dose restrictions.
Barlow, PB; Farland, MZ; Franks, AS; Shoulders, BR; Williams, JD, 2014
)
0.95
" The osteogenic effect of simvastatin-loaded bone cement was in a critical sized defect in vivo to test the hypothesis the biologic response would be different depending on the dosage of simvastatin applied to bone cement."( The effect of simvastatin-loaded polymeric microspheres in a critical size bone defect in the rabbit calvaria.
Coelho, PG; Galli, S; Ichikawa, T; Jimbo, R; Kozai, Y; Naito, Y; Ozeki, T; Tagami, T; Terukina, T; Vandeweghe, S, 2014
)
1.06
" 18/49 HNSCC qualified for FLAVINO-based dose-response analyses, and Sim significantly suppressed CF in 18/18 primary HNSCC."( Simvastatin suppresses head and neck squamous cell carcinoma ex vivo and enhances the cytostatic effects of chemotherapeutics.
Aigner, A; Boehm, A; Dietz, A; Mozet, C; Stoehr, M; Wichmann, G, 2014
)
1.85
" Experimental time and dosage effects were observed for most bone values in the study group."( Topical application of slow-release simvastatin as a bone substitute in bone defects in the rat tibia: a pilot study.
Alterman, M; Casap, N; Friedman, M; Laviv, A; Rushinek, H; Weiss, EI,
)
0.41
" Dosage and the methodology of administration require further calibration."( Topical application of slow-release simvastatin as a bone substitute in bone defects in the rat tibia: a pilot study.
Alterman, M; Casap, N; Friedman, M; Laviv, A; Rushinek, H; Weiss, EI,
)
0.41
" The geometric mean AUC0-24h ratio of simvastatin acid for the two combined dosing regimens (B/C) and 90% confidence interval were 111% (102-121)."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between simvastatin and fenofibrate with staggered and simultaneous dosing: Does it matter?
Ansquer, JC; Aubonnet, P; Beckmann, K; Driessen, S; Lehnick, D; Mihara, K; Olbrich, M; Piskol, G; van Amsterdam, P; van Assche, H; Winsemius, A, 2014
)
0.95
" After the dosing period of 8 days the animals were sacrificed and the blood was collected for the analysis of ST, its active metabolite simvastatin acid (STA), total cholesterol, triglyceride and liver enzymes including aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase."( Effect of vitamin D on bioavailability and lipid lowering efficacy of simvastatin.
Al-Asmari, AK; Al-Eid, A; Al-Omani, SF; Al-Sabaan, F; Tariq, M; Ullah, Z, 2015
)
0.85
" Statins exhibit a class-wide side effect of muscle toxicity and weakness, which has led regulators to impose both dosage limitations and a recall."( Genetic factors affecting statin concentrations and subsequent myopathy: a HuGENet systematic review.
Austin, MA; Canestaro, WJ; Thummel, KE, 2014
)
0.4
" However, further studies to identify the optimal statin and dosing are required."( Simvastatin increases the in vivo activity of the first-line tuberculosis regimen.
Bruiners, N; Gennaro, ML; Karakousis, PC; Pine, R; Pinn, ML; Skerry, C, 2014
)
1.85
" The described method was robust and successfully applied in quality control laboratories for routine analysis to determine the butylhydroxyanisol and simvastatin with its impurities content in tablet dosage forms."( Development and validation of a reversed-phase HPLC method for simultaneous analysis of butylhydroxyanisol, simvastatin and its impurities in tablet dosage forms.
Amood A L-Kamarany, M; Azougagh, M; Bouchafra, H; Bouklouze, A; Cherrah, Y; El Karbane, M, 2014
)
0.81
" Pregnant Sprague Dawley rats were dosed orally with SMV, dipentyl phthalate (DPeP), or SMV plus DPeP from gestational days 14-18, and fetuses were evaluated on GD18."( Simvastatin and dipentyl phthalate lower ex vivo testicular testosterone production and exhibit additive effects on testicular testosterone and gene expression via distinct mechanistic pathways in the fetal rat.
Beverly, BE; Foster, PM; Furr, JR; Gray, LE; Lambright, CS; McIntyre, BS; Sampson, H; Travlos, G; Wilson, VS, 2014
)
1.85
" This article reviews updated FDA warnings on capping the dose of simvastatin, recent package insert labeling changes of particular statins that address combinations with potent cytochrome P450 inhibitors, and current renal dosing recommendations for statins."( Avoiding patient morbidity: Updated statin drug interactions and risks for patient harm.
Campbell, JD; Finks, SW, 2014
)
0.64
"Opportunity to increase simvastatin dosing through education, prescribing targets and incentives."( Quality and efficiency of statin prescribing across countries with a special focus on South Africa: findings and future implications.
Bishop, I; Campbell, SM; Godman, B; Malmström, RE; Truter, I, 2015
)
0.72
" In June 2011, the US FDA released a Drug Safety Communication that provided updated product labeling with dosing restrictions for simvastatin to minimize the risk of myopathies."( Simvastatin prescribing patterns before and after FDA dosing restrictions: a retrospective analysis of a large healthcare claims database.
Ghushchyan, V; Nair, K; Saseen, JJ; Tuchscherer, RM, 2015
)
2.06
"Our objective was to describe prescribing patterns of simvastatin in combination with medications known to increase the risk of myopathies following updated product labeling dosing restrictions in June 2011."( Simvastatin prescribing patterns before and after FDA dosing restrictions: a retrospective analysis of a large healthcare claims database.
Ghushchyan, V; Nair, K; Saseen, JJ; Tuchscherer, RM, 2015
)
2.11
" To improve dosing accuracy and facilitate the determination of dosing regimens in function of the body weight, the proposed study aims at preparing transdermal niosomal gels of simvastatin as possible transdermal drug delivery system for pediatric applications."( Assessment of simvastatin niosomes for pediatric transdermal drug delivery.
Ahmed, OA; Fahmy, UA; Hosny, KM; Zidan, AS, 2016
)
0.99
"To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of three statin dosing schemes in the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) perspective."( Cost-effectiveness of high, moderate and low-dose statins in the prevention of vascular events in the Brazilian public health system.
Duncan, BB; Polanczyk, CA; Restelatto, LM; Ribeiro, RA; Stella, SF; Vieira, JL; Ziegelmann, PK, 2015
)
0.42
" SMV dosage was set as control group and had two different dosages in this group on the basis of the concentration of SMV."( [Effects of simvastatin nano-liposomes on osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells].
Qi, R; Shen, WW; Wang, C; Xu, L, 2014
)
0.78
" Compared with the same dosage of SMV in these groups, control group and experimental group had significantly elevated the specific activity of ALP, the staining of BCIP/NBTKit as well as the protein expression of BMP-2."( [Effects of simvastatin nano-liposomes on osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells].
Qi, R; Shen, WW; Wang, C; Xu, L, 2014
)
0.78
" Dosing was designed to produce comparable low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reductions, while enabling assessment of potential simvastatin-associated pleiotropic effects."( High-dose simvastatin exhibits enhanced lipid-lowering effects relative to simvastatin/ezetimibe combination therapy.
D'Alexandri, FL; Fiehn, O; Grapov, D; Haeggström, JZ; Hyötyläinen, T; Newman, JW; Orešič, M; Pedersen, TL; Pernow, J; Settergren, M; Snowden, SG; Wheelock, CE, 2014
)
1.01
" Further research is necessary to determine the optimal dosage and the safety of simvastatin."( Reduction of epidural scar adhesion by topical application of simvastatin after laminectomy in rats.
Cao, XJ; Li, XL; Liang, Y; Lu, C; Sun, Y; Yan, LQ, 2015
)
0.88
" In addition, the reduced dosage rate of SMV-zein nanoparticles improves patient tolerability and compliance."( Optimization of caseinate-coated simvastatin-zein nanoparticles: improved bioavailability and modified release characteristics.
Ahmed, OA; Al-Sawahli, MM; Fahmy, UA; Hosny, KM, 2015
)
0.7
" It is a major determinant of half-life and dosing frequency of a drug."( Volume of Distribution in Drug Design.
Beaumont, K; Di, L; Maurer, TS; Smith, DA, 2015
)
0.42
" The administration of simvastatin also prevented the morphine-induced shift to the right of the 50% effective dose (ED50) in the dose-response curve."( Simvastatin prevents morphine antinociceptive tolerance and withdrawal symptoms in rats.
Ghasemi, F; Hassanzadeh, K; Izadpanah, E; Moloudi, MR; Moradi, A; Rahimmi, A, 2015
)
2.17
" Low-density lipoprotein receptor-knockout (LDLR(-/-)) mice fed an atherogenic diet were dosed daily with H(2) and/or simvastatin."( Molecular hydrogen stabilizes atherosclerotic plaque in low-density lipoprotein receptor-knockout mice.
Jiao, P; Qin, S; Song, G; Sun, X; Tian, H; Tian, S; Wu, Y; Yao, S; Yu, Y; Zhai, L; Zhang, X; Zhang, Z; Zhao, H; Zong, C, 2015
)
0.63
" The guideline identifies four cohorts of patients with proven benefits from statin therapy and streamlines the dosing and monitoring recommendations based on evidence from published, randomized controlled trials."( Implementation of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Cholesterol Guideline Including Data From the Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial.
Dinkler, J; Watson, K; Ziaeian, B, 2015
)
0.42
" Primary PK and PD parameters were AUCs on dosing days."( Lack of Potential Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions Between Piragliatin, a Glucokinase Activator, and Simvastatin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Boldrin, M; Georgy, A; Liang, Z; Zhai, S; Zhi, J, 2016
)
0.64
" All of the incorrect interpretations were for patients with test results indicating a dosing or drug change (6/19; 32%)."( Community pharmacists' experience with pharmacogenetic testing.
Haga, SB; Mills, R; Moaddeb, J,
)
0.13
" Thus, the patch may serve as an alternative therapy to oral dosage form of simvastatin with outmost patient compliance."( Application of Response Surface Methodology for Design and Optimization of Reservoir-type Transdermal Patch of Simvastatin.
Parhi, R; Patnaik, S; Suresh, P, 2016
)
0.88
" Thus, the film may serve as an alternative therapy to oral dosage form of SS."( Formulation optimization and characterization of transdermal film of simvastatin by response surface methodology.
Parhi, R; Suresh, P, 2016
)
0.67
"In order to achieve better in-vivo performance of the final dosage form comprising a poorly soluble drug the physicochemical properties of the active pharmaceutical ingredient can be altered not only by changing the solid state form but also through the conversion of their crystal habits."( Influence of Crystal Habit on the Dissolution of Simvastatin Single Crystals.
Bukovec, P; Meden, A; Smrkolj, M; Vrečer, F, 2015
)
0.67
" Model application can be of advantage for dosing adjustment to avoid serious adverse effects resulted from concomitant use of both drugs."( Pharmacokinetic model for the inhibition of simvastatin metabolism by itraconazole.
Chan-Im, D; Chiang-Ngernthanyakool, R; Lohitnavy, M; Methaneethorn, J; Phaohorm, S; Tongpeng, W, 2015
)
0.68
" Duration and dosage of statin use were obtained from pharmaceutical claims."( Statin use associated with a reduced risk of pneumonia requiring hospitalization in patients with myocardial infarction: a nested case-control study.
Chang, YH; Chien, LN; Chuang, MT; Lin, CF; Liu, JC, 2016
)
0.43
" After 6 months, a subset of HC rats began daily oral simvastatin dosing (HC+S) at 20 mg/kg."( Effect of simvastatin on rat supraspinatus tendon mechanical and histological properties in a diet-induced hypercholesterolemia model.
Soslowsky, LJ; Tucker, JJ, 2016
)
1.09
" Controversial results between the in vivo studies are mostly due to the differences in the route of administration, dose, dosage and carrier type."( Role of Simvastatin on fracture healing and osteoporosis: a systematic review on in vivo investigations.
Moshiri, A; Oryan, A; Sharifi, AM, 2016
)
0.87
" Concentrations required for effective simvastatin- or resveratrol-induced inhibition of mitochondrial respiration were found much higher than concentrations achieved under standard dosing of these drugs."( Effect of Simvastatin, Coenzyme Q10, Resveratrol, Acetylcysteine and Acetylcarnitine on Mitochondrial Respiration.
Fišar, Z; Hroudová, J; Kopřivová, A; Macečková, D; Singh, N, 2016
)
1.11
" No significant associations were observed in dose-response analyses or in analysis of all-cause mortality."( Statin use and breast cancer survival: a nationwide cohort study in Scotland.
Cardwell, CR; Hughes, CM; Mc Menamin, ÚC; Murray, LJ, 2016
)
0.43
" This work aimed at developing an innovative solid dosage form for oral administration based on tableting nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC), coated with conventional polymer agents."( Can lipid nanoparticles improve intestinal absorption?
Arnaut, LG; Mendes, M; Pais, AACC; Soares, HT; Sousa, JJ; Vitorino, C, 2016
)
0.43
" We considered any type and dosage of statin as eligible, as long as the control and experimental arms differed only in the timing of the administration of the same statin."( Chronotherapy versus conventional statins therapy for the treatment of hyperlipidaemia.
Añino Alba, A; Fernandez-Esteban, I; Fernandez-Tabera, JM; Gómez Álvarez, P; Izquierdo-Palomares, JM; Martin-Carrillo, P; Pinar López, Ó; Plana, MN; Saiz, LC, 2016
)
0.43
" In vivo, low continuous dosing of ezetimibe, delivered by food, or simvastatin, delivered via an osmotic pump had no effect on tumor growth compared to control mice."( Evidence for Feedback Regulation Following Cholesterol Lowering Therapy in a Prostate Cancer Xenograft Model.
Alfaqih, MA; Barry, WT; Dambal, SK; Dewhirst, MW; Freedland, AR; Freedland, SJ; Freeman, MR; Macias, E; Masko, EM; Muehlbauer, MJ; Newgard, CB; Phillips, TE; Pizzo, SV; Poulton, SH; Sanders, SE; Solomon, KR; Sun, S; Valilis, NA, 2017
)
0.69
" Electronic pharmacy records were used to abstract information on the type, length, and dosage of statin exposures starting in the year prior to diagnosis."( Influence of Statins and Cholesterol on Mortality Among Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
Chang, JI; Huang, BZ; Li, E; Wu, BU; Xiang, AH, 2017
)
0.46
" Vitamin D (25-OHD) dosing was performed by chemiluminescence method through the LIAISON® Vitamin D assay (Diasorin Inc)."( Impact of high-dose statins on vitamin D levels and platelet function in patients with coronary artery disease.
Barbieri, L; Bellomo, G; Daffara, V; De Luca, G; Marino, P; Nardin, M; Pergolini, P; Rolla, R; Schaffer, A; Suryapranata, H; Verdoia, M, 2017
)
0.46
" Also, preoperative adjustment of statin dosage may be recommended."( Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a patient on simvastatin : Delayed recovery from neuromuscular blockade.
Abd El-Hakeem, EE; Almazlom, SA; Alsayyad, AJ; Kaki, AM, 2017
)
0.71
" When two incompatible drugs need to be administered at the same time and in a single formulation, bilayer tablets are the most appropriate dosage form to administer such incompatible drugs in a single dose."( Development of Bilayer Tablets with Modified Release of Selected Incompatible Drugs.
Awasthi, R; Dhiman, N; Dua, K; Jindal, S; Khatri, S,
)
0.13
"Stable and compatible bilayer tablets containing telmisartan and simvastatin were developed with better patient compliance as an alternative to existing conventional dosage forms."( Development of Bilayer Tablets with Modified Release of Selected Incompatible Drugs.
Awasthi, R; Dhiman, N; Dua, K; Jindal, S; Khatri, S,
)
0.37
" Metformin hydrochloride (MTF), sitagliptin phosphate (SIT), simvastatin (SIM) and ezetimibe (EZB) were simultaneously determined with a simple reversed-phase LC method in which a SIT-SIM binary mixture, present in a dosage form brand, was considered central for its development."( A Versatile Liquid Chromatographic Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Metformin, Sitagliptin, Simvastatin, and Ezetimibe in Different Dosage Forms.
El-Zaher, AA; Elkady, EF; Elwy, HM; Saleh, MAEM, 2018
)
0.94
"Chemometric spectrophotometric methods have been developed in the present study for the simultaneous determination of simvastatin and nicotinic acid in their synthetic binary mixtures and in their mixtures with possible excipients present in tablet dosage form."( Development and Validation of Chemometric Spectrophotometric Methods for Simultaneous Determination of Simvastatin and Nicotinic Acid in Binary Combinations.
Alahmad, S; Elfatatry, HM; Hammad, SF; Mabrouk, MM; Mansour, FR, 2018
)
0.9
" The developed SV-specific PBPK model could potentially be used to assess the influence of formulation factors on drug absorption and disposition when developing SV oral dosage forms."( In vitro/in silico approach in the development of simvastatin-loaded self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems.
Ćetković, Z; Cvijić, S; Vasiljević, D, 2018
)
0.73
" Therefore, the combination of low dosage simvastatin and NF-PLLA scaffolds appears to be a promising strategy for dentin regeneration with inflamed dental pulp tissue, by minimizing the inflammatory reaction and increasing the regenerative potential of resident stem cells."( Simvastatin and nanofibrous poly(l-lactic acid) scaffolds to promote the odontogenic potential of dental pulp cells in an inflammatory environment.
de Souza Costa, CA; Eyster, TW; Ma, PX; Mohamed, F; Soares, DG; Zhang, Z, 2018
)
2.19
"First, we performed a dose-response assay to select the bioactive dose of SIM capable of inducing an odontoblastic phenotype in dental pulp cells (DPCs); after which we evaluated the synergistic effect of this dosage with the CHSC/DPC construct."( Biological Analysis of Simvastatin-releasing Chitosan Scaffold as a Cell-free System for Pulp-dentin Regeneration.
Anovazzi, G; Basso, FG; Bordini, EAF; de Souza Costa, CA; Hebling, J; Silva Leite, MLA; Soares, DG; Zuta, UO, 2018
)
0.79
" Globally, SIM induced several effects that did not follow a dose-response relationship; embryonic development, biochemical and molecular markers, were significantly impacted in the lower concentrations, 8 ng/L, 40 ng/L and/or 200 ng/L, whereas no effects were recorded for the highest tested SIM levels (1000 ng/L)."( Chronic environmentally relevant levels of simvastatin disrupt embryonic development, biochemical and molecular responses in zebrafish (Danio rerio).
André, A; Barros, S; Capitão, A; Montes, R; Neuparth, T; Quintana, JB; Rodil, R; Santos, MM; Soares, J, 2018
)
0.74
"We observed that a low dosage of simvastatin accelerated cell proliferation , whereas its high dosage (>15 μg/mL) suppressed propagation."( Simvastatin increases cell viability and suppresses the expression of cytokines and vascular endothelial growth factor in inflamed human dental pulp stem cells in vitro.
Gong, Z; Li, X; Qiu, Y; Xue, D; Zhu, F, 2018
)
2.2
"Fifty-two patients in the CYP3A study (pharmacokinetic [PK] analysis, n = 49), and 44 patients in the BCRP study were dosed (PK analysis, n = 44)."( Effect of multiple-dose osimertinib on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and rosuvastatin.
Aransay, NR; Arkenau, T; Bui, K; Dickinson, PA; Harvey, RD; Isambert, N; Lee, JS; So, K; Thomas, K; Vansteenkiste, J; Vishwanathan, K; Weilert, D, 2018
)
0.72
"All patients with age ≤75 years undergoing PCI between January 2011 and May 2016 at an urban, tertiary care center and discharged with available statin dosage data were included."( Temporal trends, determinants, and impact of high-intensity statin prescriptions after percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from a large single-center prospective registry.
Aquino, M; Baber, U; Barman, N; Camaj, A; Chandrasekhar, J; Claessen, B; Dangas, G; Faggioni, M; Farhan, S; Guedeney, P; Kalkman, DN; Kini, A; Kovacic, JC; Mehran, R; Moreno, P; Shah, S; Sharma, S; Sorrentino, S; Sweeny, J; Vijay, P; Vogel, B, 2019
)
0.51
"The drug in a solid dosage form must undergo dissolution before it is available for absorption from the gastrointestinal tract."( Liquisolid systems: Understanding the impact of drug state (solution or dispersion), nonvolatile solvent and coating material on simvastatin apparent aqueous solubility and flowability.
Anzilaggo, D; O'Reilly Beringhs, A; Pezzini, BR; Sonaglio, D; Stulzer, HK, 2019
)
0.72
" The optimal drug dosage was determined by examining the proliferative activity and ALP activity of the MG63 cells."( The role of the ERK1/2 pathway in simvastatin-loaded nanomicelles and simvastatin in regulating the osteogenic effect in MG63 cells.
Feng, X; Niu, M; Zhou, L, 2018
)
0.76
" The results of this study confirmed that a simple method of extrusion-spheronization can be employed to enhance the dissolution of simvastatin in multi particulates dosage form which can also be employed for other poorly water-soluble drugs."( Synergistic effect of polyethylene glycol and superdisintegrant on dissolution rate enhancement of simvastatin in pellet formulation.
Afrasiabi Garekani, H; Aftabi, SF; Javidi, M; Nia, FF; Nokhodchi, A; Sadeghi, F, 2019
)
0.93
" This joint simvastatin metabolite model is envisaged to facilitate optimisation of simvastatin dosing in children/adolescents."( A population pharmacokinetic model for simvastatin and its metabolites in children and adolescents.
Abdel-Rahman, S; Galetin, A; Leeder, JS; Ogungbenro, K; Wagner, JB, 2019
)
1.16
" Our findings contribute towards the design of controlled release with low drug dosing bone grafts: i-CPFs loaded with PITA as osteogenic and angiogenic agent."( Injectable calcium phosphate foams for the delivery of Pitavastatin as osteogenic and angiogenic agent.
Canal, C; Ginebra, MP; Guillem-Marti, J; Khurana, K; Mücklich, F; Soldera, F, 2020
)
0.56
" Those who terminated statin medication or reduced statin dosage had a higher mortality (34% and 20%, respectively; P < 0."( Adherence to statin therapy favours survival of patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease.
Adam, L; Baumgartner, I; Dopheide, JF; Drexel, H; Kaspar, M; Papac, L; Ramadani, H; Rastan, A; Veit, J; Vonbank, A, 2021
)
0.62
" Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and intensity of statin therapy (based on dosage and type of statin) were assessed from all available hospital records."( Treatment Patterns of Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Aged Above and Below 75 Years: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study of 1500 Patients in a Tertiary Care Referral Center in Germany.
Al-Rashid, F; Dykun, I; Hendricks, S; Jánosi, RA; Mahabadi, AA; Rassaf, T; Totzeck, M; Wiefhoff, D, 2020
)
0.56
" The present study demonstrated that there was an association between the therapeutic effect and dosage of simvastatin within a definitive range."( Effects of simvastatin on iNOS and caspase‑3 levels and oxidative stress following smoke inhalation injury.
Chang, C; Cui, ZJ; Gao, Y; Guo, PF; Khan, I; Ma, Z; Meng, QN; Wang, XB; Yang, RQ, 2020
)
1.16
" Due to MI alone, simvastatin dosage was reduced in 23."( Safety of Chronic Simvastatin Treatment in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis: Many Adverse Events but No Liver Injury.
Álvarez, D; Cartier, M; Marino, M; Míguez, C; Muñoz, AE; Pollarsky, F; Romero, G; Salgado, P; Vázquez, H, 2021
)
1.29
"Chronic treatment with simvastatin 40 mg/day in patients with decompensated cirrhosis was associated with several adverse events, being MI the only clinically significant one, which appears to be related to the simvastatin dosage and the degree of cirrhosis severity."( Safety of Chronic Simvastatin Treatment in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis: Many Adverse Events but No Liver Injury.
Álvarez, D; Cartier, M; Marino, M; Míguez, C; Muñoz, AE; Pollarsky, F; Romero, G; Salgado, P; Vázquez, H, 2021
)
1.27
" Simvastatin therapy for 6 months in patients with the initial stage of heart failure at a daily dosage of 20 mg does not impair glomerular function in the form of reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR)."( Сhanges in the functional state of the epithelium of the proximal renal tubules in patients with the initial stage of chronic heart failure during simvastatin therapy.
Kopylov, VY, 2020
)
1.67
" Most importantly, benefit from the effective in situ calcium supplement and targeted Sim delivery, this therapeutic regime (TMA/Sim) achieved better synergetic effects than conventional combination strategies with promising osteoporosis reversion performance under low calcium dosage (1/10 of commercial calcium carbonate tablet) and significantly attenuated side effects."( Water/pH dual responsive in situ calcium supplement collaborates simvastatin for osteoblast promotion mediated osteoporosis therapy via oral medication.
Hu, F; Lv, J; Song, Y; Tao, S; Wang, C; Yu, F; Yuan, H; Zhao, R; Zhou, W, 2021
)
0.86
" Because physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling has demonstrated to be a valuable tool to improve pharmacotherapy affected by DDIs or DGIs, it might also be useful for precision dosing in extensive interaction network scenarios."( Physiologically Based Precision Dosing Approach for Drug-Drug-Gene Interactions: A Simvastatin Network Analysis.
Lehr, T; Schwab, M; Selzer, D; Wojtyniak, JG, 2021
)
0.85
" Only rosuvastatin was assessed in a repeated dosing PK study."( A systematic review on pharmacokinetics, cardiovascular outcomes and safety profiles of statins in cirrhosis.
Abraldes, JG; Al-Karaghouli, M; Cabrera Garcia, L; Kalainy, S; Sung, S, 2021
)
0.62
" Because pharmacodynamic interaction between statins and bempedoic acid is complex, a dose-response model was developed to predict LDL-C pharmacodynamics following administration of statins combined with bempedoic acid."( Pharmacodynamic effect of bempedoic acid and statin combinations: predictions from a dose-response model.
Amore, BM; Barrett, PHR; Catapano, AL; Chapel, S; Crass, RL; Emery, MG; Jadhav, SB; Kerschnitzki, M; Sasiela, WJ; Watts, GF, 2022
)
0.72
"Bempedoic acid and statin dosing and LDL-C data were pooled from 14 phase 1-3 clinical studies."( Pharmacodynamic effect of bempedoic acid and statin combinations: predictions from a dose-response model.
Amore, BM; Barrett, PHR; Catapano, AL; Chapel, S; Crass, RL; Emery, MG; Jadhav, SB; Kerschnitzki, M; Sasiela, WJ; Watts, GF, 2022
)
0.72
" However, because of its narrow therapeutic index, dosing can be challenging."( Stable warfarin dose prediction in sub-Saharan African patients: A machine-learning approach and external validation of a clinical dose-initiation algorithm.
Asiimwe, IG; Blockman, M; Cohen, K; Cupido, C; Hutchinson, C; Jacobson, B; Jorgensen, AL; Lamorde, M; Morgan, J; Mouton, JP; Nakagaayi, D; Okello, E; Pirmohamed, M; Schapkaitz, E; Sekaggya-Wiltshire, C; Semakula, JR; Waitt, C; Zhang, EJ, 2022
)
0.72
" Among the two technologies, fluid bed layering provided dry emulsion products with higher relative bioavailability and better product characteristics for further processing into final dosage forms."( Relative bioavailability enhancement of simvastatin via dry emulsion systems: Comparison of spray drying and fluid bed layering technology.
Aguiar Zdovc, J; Dreu, R; Gosenca Matjaž, M; Grabnar, I; Mravljak, J; Pohlen, M; Snoj, T; Trontelj, J, 2022
)
0.99
" Ten patients were instructed to interrupt simvastatin dosing and return for blood sampling for the subsequent 3 days."( Monitoring Simvastatin Adherence in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Study Based on Pharmacokinetic Measurements in Blood Plasma.
Andersen, AM; Bergan, S; Fagerland, MW; Husebye, E; Kristiansen, O; Munkhaugen, J; Vethe, NT, 2022
)
1.37
" Peak and trough drug plasma concentrations were collected based on the dosing interval and pharmacokinetics of the drugs and quantified using high performance liquid chromatography."( Simvastatin, but Not Atorvastatin, Is Associated with Higher Peak Rivaroxaban Serum Levels and Bleeding: an Asian Cohort Study from Singapore.
Chan, ECY; Soh, XQ; Tan, DS, 2023
)
2.35
" Here, four-week-old mice expressing KrasG12D in all pancreatic lineages (KC mice) and fed an obesogenic high fat, high calorie diet that promotes early PDAC development were randomized onto low dosage metformin, simvastatin, or both drugs in combination administered orally."( Low dosage combination treatment with metformin and simvastatin inhibits obesity-promoted pancreatic cancer development in male KrasG12D mice.
Eibl, G; Hines, OJ; Lugea, A; Pandol, SJ; Rozengurt, E; Sinnett-Smith, J; Sun, X; Teper, Y; Waldron, RT; Ye, L, 2023
)
1.35
" The most optimal simvastatin cubosomal formulation was then included in a cubogel dosage form using different gelling agents."( Formulation and evaluation of simvastatin cubosomal nanoparticles for assessing its wound healing effect.
Ahmed, LM; Elfaham, TH; Hassanein, KMA; Mohamed, FA, 2023
)
1.53
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (5)

RoleDescription
EC 3.4.24.83 (anthrax lethal factor endopeptidase) inhibitorAn EC 3.4.24.* (metalloendopeptidase) inhibitor that interferes with the action of anthrax lethal factor endopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.83).
prodrugA compound that, on administration, must undergo chemical conversion by metabolic processes before becoming the pharmacologically active drug for which it is a prodrug.
EC 1.1.1.34/EC 1.1.1.88 (hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase) inhibitorAny EC 1.1.1.* (oxidoreductase acting on donor CH-OH group, NAD(+) or NADP(+) acceptor) inhibitor that inhibits HMG-CoA reductases. Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors have been shown to lower directly cholesterol synthesis. The Enzyme Commission designation is EC 1.1.1.34 for the NADPH-dependent enzyme and EC 1.1.1.88 for an NADH-dependent enzyme.
ferroptosis inducerAny substance that induces or promotes ferroptosis (a type of programmed cell death dependent on iron and characterized by the accumulation of lipid peroxides) in organisms.
geroprotectorAny compound that supports healthy aging, slows the biological aging process, or extends lifespan.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (4)

ClassDescription
delta-lactoneA lactone having a six-membered lactone ring.
fatty acid esterA carboxylic ester in which the carboxylic acid component can be any fatty acid.
statin (semi-synthetic)A statin that is derived from a naturally occurring statin by partial chemical synthesis.
hexahydronaphthalenesAny carbobycyclic compound that is an hexahydronaphthalene or a compound obtained from an hexahydronaphthalene by formal substitution of one or more hydrogens.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (1)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
Simvastatin Action Pathway2143

Protein Targets (71)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, Beta-lactamaseEscherichia coli K-12Potency28.93420.044717.8581100.0000AID485294; AID485341
Chain A, JmjC domain-containing histone demethylation protein 3AHomo sapiens (human)Potency25.11890.631035.7641100.0000AID504339
Chain A, Ferritin light chainEquus caballus (horse)Potency35.48135.623417.292931.6228AID485281
hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha subunitHomo sapiens (human)Potency26.83253.189029.884159.4836AID1224846
RAR-related orphan receptor gammaMus musculus (house mouse)Potency2.81580.006038.004119,952.5996AID1159521; AID1159523
SMAD family member 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency30.10650.173734.304761.8120AID1346859
SMAD family member 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency30.10650.173734.304761.8120AID1346859
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency21.85280.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
GLI family zinc finger 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency20.50260.000714.592883.7951AID1259369; AID1259392
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency9.38520.000221.22318,912.5098AID743035; AID743040; AID743042; AID743054; AID743063
Smad3Homo sapiens (human)Potency10.00000.00527.809829.0929AID588855
PINK1Homo sapiens (human)Potency35.48132.818418.895944.6684AID624263
estrogen receptor 2 (ER beta)Homo sapiens (human)Potency32.34350.000657.913322,387.1992AID1259377; AID1259378
nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group I, member 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency33.49150.001022.650876.6163AID1224893
regulator of G-protein signaling 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency50.11870.531815.435837.6858AID504845
cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A polypeptide 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency2.13070.01237.983543.2770AID1346984; AID1645841
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency14.40810.001310.157742.8575AID1259252; AID1259253; AID1259255; AID1259256
glucocorticoid receptor [Homo sapiens]Homo sapiens (human)Potency9.94250.000214.376460.0339AID720691; AID720692; AID720719
retinoic acid nuclear receptor alpha variant 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency26.93960.003041.611522,387.1992AID1159552; AID1159553; AID1159555
retinoid X nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency31.31790.000817.505159.3239AID1159527; AID1159531
estrogen-related nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency9.29090.001530.607315,848.9004AID1224841; AID1224848; AID1224849; AID1259401; AID1259403
farnesoid X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency8.13490.375827.485161.6524AID743217; AID743220
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency14.75720.000229.305416,493.5996AID743069; AID743075; AID743078; AID743079; AID743080; AID743091
GVesicular stomatitis virusPotency1.94970.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
cytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)Potency27.54040.00108.379861.1304AID1645840
ParkinHomo sapiens (human)Potency35.48130.819914.830644.6684AID624263
bromodomain adjacent to zinc finger domain 2BHomo sapiens (human)Potency79.43280.707936.904389.1251AID504333
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor deltaHomo sapiens (human)Potency30.89560.001024.504861.6448AID743212
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)Potency42.81610.001019.414170.9645AID743094; AID743140; AID743191
vitamin D (1,25- dihydroxyvitamin D3) receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency15.36530.023723.228263.5986AID743222; AID743223
IDH1Homo sapiens (human)Potency7.30780.005210.865235.4813AID686970
cytochrome P450, family 19, subfamily A, polypeptide 1, isoform CRA_aHomo sapiens (human)Potency15.44900.001723.839378.1014AID743083
nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells 1 (p105), isoform CRA_aHomo sapiens (human)Potency27.627419.739145.978464.9432AID1159509; AID1159518
v-jun sarcoma virus 17 oncogene homolog (avian)Homo sapiens (human)Potency23.91450.057821.109761.2679AID1159526
nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group I, member 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30960.10009.191631.6228AID1346983
Histone H2A.xCricetulus griseus (Chinese hamster)Potency40.09540.039147.5451146.8240AID1224845
vitamin D3 receptor isoform VDRAHomo sapiens (human)Potency50.11870.354828.065989.1251AID504847
nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 isoform 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency25.92900.00419.984825.9290AID504444
thyroid hormone receptor beta isoform 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency34.60440.000323.4451159.6830AID743065; AID743067
heat shock protein beta-1Homo sapiens (human)Potency45.31070.042027.378961.6448AID743210; AID743228
serine/threonine-protein kinase PLK1Homo sapiens (human)Potency29.93490.168316.404067.0158AID720504
nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency15.47290.000627.21521,122.0200AID743202; AID743219
urokinase-type plasminogen activator precursorMus musculus (house mouse)Potency3.16230.15855.287912.5893AID540303
plasminogen precursorMus musculus (house mouse)Potency3.16230.15855.287912.5893AID540303
urokinase plasminogen activator surface receptor precursorMus musculus (house mouse)Potency3.16230.15855.287912.5893AID540303
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.93140.004611.374133.4983AID624296; AID624297
DNA dC->dU-editing enzyme APOBEC-3G isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency3.54810.058010.694926.6086AID602310
Interferon betaHomo sapiens (human)Potency1.94970.00339.158239.8107AID1645842
HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.94970.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
Cellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)Potency13.24900.002319.595674.0614AID651631
Spike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusPotency0.93280.009610.525035.4813AID1479145; AID1479148
TAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)Potency14.12541.778316.208135.4813AID652104
Inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.94970.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)Potency8.04140.011917.942071.5630AID651632
Ataxin-2Homo sapiens (human)Potency8.04140.011912.222168.7989AID651632
cytochrome P450 2C9, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency1.94970.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
photoreceptor-specific nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.16400.03742.93408.9620AID624394
transactivating tegument protein VP16 [Human herpesvirus 1]Human alphaherpesvirus 1 (Herpes simplex virus type 1)IC50 (µMol)4.42600.94604.70169.4870AID624395
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)21.02500.11007.190310.0000AID1443980; AID1443989; AID1449628; AID1473738
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.78430.00000.79498.9000AID1168896; AID1168897; AID1454766; AID241168; AID241793; AID291755; AID308508; AID625271
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)Ki34.00130.00090.00830.0235AID238540; AID238872
ATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)29.58000.00022.318510.0000AID679461; AID679464; AID681126; AID681127; AID681381
Insulin receptor Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.00340.00010.78463.3700AID625271
Prostaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00340.00010.995010.0000AID625271
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.01110.00090.20949.0300AID300167; AID384740
Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Cavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)IC50 (µMol)0.04900.00202.123310.0000AID291755
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)79.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739; AID681370
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)7.77500.05002.37979.7000AID1218863; AID1218864; AID1218865; AID681366
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)5.10000.01002.89125.1000AID1885210
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (341)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of autophagyInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylation of STAT proteinInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interferon-betaInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell proliferationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of viral genome replicationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of MHC class I biosynthetic processInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of Lewy body formationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T-helper 2 cell cytokine productionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
humoral immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell mediated cytotoxicityHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen via MHC class I via ER pathway, TAP-independentHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of T cell anergyHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
defense responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
detection of bacteriumHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of interleukin-12 productionHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of interleukin-6 productionHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protection from natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicityHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of dendritic cell differentiationHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen via MHC class IbHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
cholesterol biosynthetic process3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
visual learning3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
coenzyme A metabolic process3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein catabolic process3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein secretion3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
long-term synaptic potentiation3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of amyloid-beta clearance3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
isoprenoid biosynthetic process3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
sterol biosynthetic process3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ER overload responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
somitogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferation involved in immune responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
B cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleotide-excision repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein import into nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrestCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
Ras protein signal transductionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
gastrulationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein localizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA replicationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
determination of adult lifespanCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
rRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to salt stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to X-rayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
viral processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic G1 DNA damage checkpoint signalingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of telomere maintenance via telomeraseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of tissue remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UVCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial DNA repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription initiation-coupled chromatin remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to antibioticCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
circadian behaviorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
bone marrow developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic organ developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein stabilizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of helicase activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein tetramerizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome organizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
type II interferon-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac septum morphogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of programmed necrotic cell deathCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
necroptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ionizing radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-CCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to actinomycin DCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replicative senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative stress-induced premature senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of execution phase of apoptosisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability involved in apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G1 to G0 transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA processingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of pentose-phosphate shuntCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of fibroblast apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
G2/M transition of mitotic cell cycleATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phospholipid translocationATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
terpenoid transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of response to osmotic stressATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ceramide translocationATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of anion channel activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
carboxylic acid transmembrane transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic detoxification by transmembrane export across the plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of chloride transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin biosynthetic processProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
angiogenesisProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
embryo implantationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
learningProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
memoryProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of blood pressureProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to nematodeProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to fructoseProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to manganese ionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor productionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cyclooxygenase pathwayProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
bone mineralizationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of prostaglandin biosynthetic processProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fever generationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synaptic plasticityProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, dopaminergicProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to estradiolProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to vitamin DProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to heatProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to tumor necrosis factorProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
maintenance of blood-brain barrierProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein import into nucleusProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
hair cycleProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of nitric oxide biosynthetic processProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell cycleProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vasoconstrictionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of smooth muscle contractionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle contractionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
decidualizationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of inflammatory responseProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
brown fat cell differentiationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to glucocorticoidProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of calcium ion transportProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synaptic transmission, glutamatergicProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to fatty acidProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to mechanical stimulusProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lead ionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ATPProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to non-ionic osmotic stressProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to fluid shear stressProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transforming growth factor beta productionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell migration involved in sprouting angiogenesisProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fibroblast growth factor productionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of brown fat cell differentiationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of platelet-derived growth factor productionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular oxidant detoxificationProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of neuroinflammatory responseProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to osmotic stressProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to homocysteineProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to angiotensinProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron migrationNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to amphetamineNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-templated transcriptionNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
adult locomotory behaviorNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
post-embryonic developmentNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
central nervous system projection neuron axonogenesisNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
habenula developmentNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular receptor signaling pathwayNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to oxidative stressNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of dopamine metabolic processNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine biosynthetic processNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron maturationNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuron apoptotic processNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of respiratory gaseous exchangeNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
fat cell differentiationNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
general adaptation syndromeNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
canonical Wnt signaling pathwayNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulusNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
dopaminergic neuron differentiationNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
midbrain dopaminergic neuron differentiationNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic signaling pathwayNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
central nervous system neuron differentiationNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein phosphorylationTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA processingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
RNA splicingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein stabilityTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of insulin secretionTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
response to endoplasmic reticulum stressTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein import into nucleusTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of circadian rhythmTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation by host of viral transcriptionTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
rhythmic processTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
3'-UTR-mediated mRNA destabilizationTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
3'-UTR-mediated mRNA stabilizationTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear inner membrane organizationTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
amyloid fibril formationTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of gene expressionTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
inositol phosphate metabolic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phosphate biosynthetic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol phosphate biosynthetic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell population proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of B cell proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction in response to DNA damageATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
isotype switchingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of isotype switching to IgG isotypesATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloadingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitotic cell cycle phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of receptor internalizationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of translationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA metabolic processAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
P-body assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
stress granule assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA transportAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
thyroid hormone transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (103)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
chloramphenicol O-acetyltransferase activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
TAP bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
peptide antigen bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
TAP bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (NADPH) activity3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
protein binding3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
GTPase regulator activity3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
NADPH binding3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
coenzyme A binding3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
TFIID-class transcription factor complex bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
receptor tyrosine kinase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase regulator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent DNA/DNA annealing activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
MDM2/MDM4 family protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
disordered domain specific bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
carboxylic acid transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylcholine floppase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylethanolamine flippase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ceramide floppase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
floppase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
peroxidase activityProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase activityProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activity, acting on single donors with incorporation of molecular oxygen, incorporation of two atoms of oxygenProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
beta-catenin bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear retinoid X receptor bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear glucocorticoid receptor bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
double-stranded DNA bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
lipid bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
pre-mRNA intronic bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
molecular condensate scaffold activityTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
inositol-1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol heptakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 5-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 1-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 3-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol 5-diphosphate pentakisphosphate 5-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol diphosphate tetrakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloader activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
epidermal growth factor receptor bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
thyroid hormone transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (62)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
ER to Golgi transport vesicle membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
phagocytic vesicle membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
early endosome membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
lumenal side of endoplasmic reticulum membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
MHC class I protein complexHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
peroxisomal membrane3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membrane3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membrane3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
peroxisomal membrane3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductaseHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
PML bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
site of double-strand breakCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
germ cell nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear inner membraneProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear outer membraneProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum lumenProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
caveolaProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProstaglandin G/H synthase 2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear speckNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusNuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2Homo sapiens (human)
virion membraneSpike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus
intracellular non-membrane-bounded organelleTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
perichromatin fibrilsTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear speckTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
interchromatin granuleTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
fibrillar centerInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
Elg1 RFC-like complexATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
ribonucleoprotein complexAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (321)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID588519A screen for compounds that inhibit viral RNA polymerase binding and polymerization activities2011Antiviral research, Sep, Volume: 91, Issue:3
High-throughput screening identification of poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors.
AID540299A screen for compounds that inhibit the MenB enzyme of Mycobacterium tuberculosis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 20, Issue:21
Synthesis and SAR studies of 1,4-benzoxazine MenB inhibitors: novel antibacterial agents against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
AID1347128qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347121qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347109qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347112qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347119qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347125qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347126qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347111qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347116qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347124qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347118qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347114qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347115qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347123qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347127qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347117qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347110qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for A673 cells)2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347113qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347129qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347122qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID384744Partition coefficient, log P by reverse phase HPLC method2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID1502955Increase in HDL-C level in patient with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia at 40 mg/day2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-10, Volume: 140Lipid lowering agents of natural origin: An account of some promising chemotypes.
AID737907Selectivity index, ratio of IC50 for human HS68 cells to IC50 for human A549 cells2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-09, Volume: 56, Issue:9
Design and synthesis of dual-action inhibitors targeting histone deacetylases and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase for cancer treatment.
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID1209972Inhibition of CYP2C19 in human liver microsomes using S-mephenytoin as substrate after 8 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID1168880Hypolipidiemic activity in tyloxapol-induced ICR mouse hyperlipidemic model assessed as reduction in serum cholesterol level at 17 mg/kg, ip after 24 hrs2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
Synthesis and highly potent hypolipidemic activity of alpha-asarone- and fibrate-based 2-acyl and 2-alkyl phenols as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID737910Cytotoxicity against mouse MEF cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-09, Volume: 56, Issue:9
Design and synthesis of dual-action inhibitors targeting histone deacetylases and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase for cancer treatment.
AID1251981Antihyperlipidemic activity in Triton WR1339-induced hyperlipidemic rat assessed as reduction in plasma triglyceride level at 56 umol/kg, ip dosed 1 hr after Triton WR1339 challenge and measured 24 hrs post dose relative to control2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 23, Issue:21
Antihyperlipidemic morpholine derivatives with antioxidant activity: An investigation of the aromatic substitution.
AID1885210Agonist activity at human Nurr1 measured by Gal4-Nurr1 hybrid reporter gene assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-28, Volume: 65, Issue:14
Medicinal Chemistry and Chemical Biology of Nurr1 Modulators: An Emerging Strategy in Neurodegeneration.
AID1763789Hypolipidemic activity against oleic acid-induced lipid accumulation in human HepG2 cell model assessed as decrease in total cholestrol level at 10 uM measured after 24 hrs2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-15, Volume: 40Design, synthesis and lipid-lowering activities of penipyridone derivatives.
AID737908Selectivity index, ratio of IC50 for mouse MEF cells to IC50 for human A549 cells2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-09, Volume: 56, Issue:9
Design and synthesis of dual-action inhibitors targeting histone deacetylases and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase for cancer treatment.
AID1210017Inhibition of CYP2C9 in human liver microsomes using diclofenac as substrate after 8 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID244639Effect on cholesterol lowering in male Beagle dog at an oral dose of 4 mkd for 7 days2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-25, Volume: 48, Issue:17
Novel 2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-2-carboxylic acids: highly potent and subtype-selective PPARalpha agonists with potent hypolipidemic activity.
AID291757Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in mouse at 1 mg/kg2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-15, Volume: 17, Issue:16
Design and synthesis of novel, conformationally restricted HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID1128732Inhibition of bovine COX-1 assessed as PGF2-alpha formation using arachidonic acid as substrate at 20 uM by enzyme immunoassay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Design of novel potent antihyperlipidemic agents with antioxidant/anti-inflammatory properties: exploiting phenothiazine's strong antioxidant activity.
AID384740Inhibition of HMGR in rat hepatic microsomes assessed as conversion of [14C]HMG-CoA to [14C]mevalonic acid2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID308509Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in rat hepatocyte2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-15, Volume: 17, Issue:16
Design and synthesis of hepatoselective, pyrrole-based HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID1289047Cmax in healthy human subjects at 40 mg with 200 ml grape fruit juice drug administered as single dose on day 3 of grape fruit juice challenge measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID571000Antimalarial activity against Plasmodium falciparum infected in mouse assessed as mouse survival at 40 mg/kg, ip, qd administered 3 days post infection for 6 days measured after 6 days relative to control2008Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 52, Issue:11
Statins alone are ineffective in cerebral malaria but potentiate artesunate.
AID520095Antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium berghei ANKA infected in C57BL/6 mice (Mus musculus) assessed as parasitemia at 2 ug/g, intraperitoneally on days 2,4 and 62008Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Apr, Volume: 52, Issue:4
Simvastatin treatment shows no effect on the incidence of cerebral malaria or parasitemia during experimental malaria.
AID313915Cmax in human2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Hepatoselectivity of statins: design and synthesis of 4-sulfamoyl pyrroles as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID1763788Hypolipidemic activity against oleic acid-induced lipid accumulation in human HepG2 cell model assessed as decrease in triglycerides level at 10 uM measured after 24 hrs2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-15, Volume: 40Design, synthesis and lipid-lowering activities of penipyridone derivatives.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID28681Partition coefficient (logD6.5)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID681837TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Pravastatin uptake (Pravastatin: 30 uM, Simvastatin: 300 uM) in Xenopus laevis oocytes1999Pharmaceutical research, Jun, Volume: 16, Issue:6
Pravastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, is transported by rat organic anion transporting polypeptide, oatp2.
AID1289051Cmax in healthy human subjects assessed as simvastatin acid at 40 mg with 200 ml grape fruit juice drug administered as single dose on day 3 of grape fruit juice challenge measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID406849Antiplasmodial activity against chloroquine-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum 3D72007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Jul, Volume: 51, Issue:7
Atorvastatin is 10-fold more active in vitro than other statins against Plasmodium falciparum.
AID384741Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in rat hepatocytes assessed as incorporation of [14C]acetate into cholesterol2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID86692In vitro inhibitory activity was evaluated on cholesterol biosynthesis in HepG2 cells2004Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-09, Volume: 14, Issue:3
Synthesis and biological activity of a novel squalene epoxidase inhibitor, FR194738.
AID1218864Inhibition of OATP1B1 (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293 cells using estradiol-17beta-glucuronide substrate2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Aug, Volume: 40, Issue:8
The development, characterization, and application of an OATP1B1 inhibition assay in drug discovery.
AID1289045Elimination half life in healthy human subjects assessed as simvastatin acid at 40 mg with water administered as single dose measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID29811Oral bioavailability in human2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID1289042AUC (0 to 24 hrs) in healthy human subjects at 40 mg with water administered as single dose measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID682110TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Pravastatin uptake (Pravastatin: 0.5 uM, Simvastatin: 50 uM) in OATP-C-expressing 293c18 cells1999The Journal of biological chemistry, Dec-24, Volume: 274, Issue:52
A novel human hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP2). Identification of a liver-specific human organic anion transporting polypeptide and identification of rat and human hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor transporters.
AID736212Antidyslipidemic activity against triton WR1339-induced hyperlipidemia in rat assessed as reduction in plasma total cholesterol level at 56 umol/kg, ip after 24 hrs (Rvb = 260%)2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 56, Issue:8
New multifunctional Di-tert-butylphenoloctahydro(pyrido/benz)oxazine derivatives with antioxidant, antihyperlipidemic, and antidiabetic action.
AID244640Effect on cholesterol lowering in male Beagle dog at an oral dose of 4 mkd for 10 days2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-25, Volume: 48, Issue:17
Novel 2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-2-carboxylic acids: highly potent and subtype-selective PPARalpha agonists with potent hypolipidemic activity.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1443995Hepatotoxicity in human assessed as drug-induced liver injury2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID1193494Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound in simulated gastric fluid at pH 1.2 at RT after 4 hrs by 96 well plate method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID678713Inhibition of human CYP2C9 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-methoxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin-3-acetic acid as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID261959Decrease in cholesterol level in Beagle dog at 4 mg/kg, po2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 16, Issue:6
Design and synthesis of potent and subtype-selective PPARalpha agonists.
AID681366TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of estradiol-17beta-glucuronide uptake(estradiol-17beta-glucuronide:0.02uM) in OATP1B1-expressing HEK293 cells2005Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 33, Issue:4
Differential interaction of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coa reductase inhibitors with ABCB1, ABCC2, and OATP1B1.
AID1168892Hypolipidemic activity in tyloxapol-induced ICR mouse hyperlipidemic model assessed as reduction in serum triglyceride level at 17 mg/kg, ip after 24 hrs2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
Synthesis and highly potent hypolipidemic activity of alpha-asarone- and fibrate-based 2-acyl and 2-alkyl phenols as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID313916Ratio of Cmax for human to IC50 for rat L6 myocyte2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Hepatoselectivity of statins: design and synthesis of 4-sulfamoyl pyrroles as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID1502954Reduction in LDL-C level in patient with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia at 40 mg/day2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-10, Volume: 140Lipid lowering agents of natural origin: An account of some promising chemotypes.
AID300167Inhibition of rat microsomal HMG-CoA reductase assessed as inhibition of cholesterol synthesis after 30 mins2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 15, Issue:16
Discovery of pyrrole-based hepatoselective ligands as potent inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase.
AID1443991Induction of mitochondrial dysfunction in Sprague-Dawley rat liver mitochondria assessed as inhibition of mitochondrial respiration per mg mitochondrial protein measured for 20 mins by A65N-1 oxygen probe based fluorescence assay2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID1636488Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2C9-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 13.8 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of N2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID487629Inhibition of Schizosaccharomyces pombe HMG-CoA reductase by spectrophotometry2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-15, Volume: 18, Issue:12
Design, synthesis, and docking of highly hypolipidemic agents: Schizosaccharomyces pombe as a new model for evaluating alpha-asarone-based HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID27167Delta logD (logD6.5 - logD7.4)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID1473797Drug concentration at steady state in human at 5 to 80 mg, po QD after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID679464TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Daunorubicin transport in 3T3-G185 cells2001Pharmaceutical research, Jun, Volume: 18, Issue:6
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) characterized as direct inhibitors of P-glycoprotein.
AID520098Antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium berghei ANKA infected in C57BL/6 mice (Mus musculus) assessed as parasitemia at 100 ug/g, perorally on days 1,3 and 52008Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Apr, Volume: 52, Issue:4
Simvastatin treatment shows no effect on the incidence of cerebral malaria or parasitemia during experimental malaria.
AID386623Inhibition of 4-(4-(dimethylamino)styryl)-N-methylpyridinium uptake at human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells at 100 uM by confocal microscopy2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 51, Issue:19
Structural requirements for drug inhibition of the liver specific human organic cation transport protein 1.
AID699539Inhibition of human liver OATP1B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID699541Inhibition of human liver OATP2B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E3S uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID1210015Inhibition of CYP1A2 in human liver microsomes using phenacetin as substrate after 8 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID1251980Antihypercholesterolemic activity in Triton WR1339-induced hyperlipidemic rat assessed as reduction in plasma LDL-C level at 56 umol/kg, ip dosed 1 hr after Triton WR1339 challenge and measured 24 hrs post dose relative to control2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 23, Issue:21
Antihyperlipidemic morpholine derivatives with antioxidant activity: An investigation of the aromatic substitution.
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID678718Metabolic stability in human liver microsomes assessed as high signal/noise ratio (S/N of >100) by measuring GSH adduct formation at 100 uM after 90 mins by HPLC-MS analysis2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID311524Oral bioavailability in human2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Hologram QSAR model for the prediction of human oral bioavailability.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1289040Tmax in healthy human subjects at 40 mg with water administered as single dose measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID678722Covalent binding affinity to human liver microsomes assessed per mg of protein at 10 uM after 60 mins presence of NADPH2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1764187Hypolipidemic activity against oleic acid-induced lipid accumulation in human HepG2 cell model assessed reduction in total cholesterol level2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-01, Volume: 47Phenolic compounds from the leaves of Crataegus pinnatifida Bge. var. major N.E.Br. And their lipid-lowering effects.
AID1168884Hypolipidiemic activity in tyloxapol-induced ICR mouse hyperlipidemic model assessed as reduction in serum LDL-cholesterol level at 17 mg/kg, ip after 24 hrs2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
Synthesis and highly potent hypolipidemic activity of alpha-asarone- and fibrate-based 2-acyl and 2-alkyl phenols as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID1209973Inhibition of CYP2D6 in human liver microsomes using dextromethorphan as substrate after 8 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID1631436Antiviral activity against Dengue virus 2 NGC infected in human A549 cells assessed as reduction in virus replication after 48 hrs by renilla luciferase reporter gene assay2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 59, Issue:12
The Medicinal Chemistry of Dengue Virus.
AID385190Safety index, ratio of ED50 for inhibition of hepatic cholesterol synthesis in Sprague-Dawley rat to drug dose not causing >2.5 fold increase in plasma creatine kinase level in weanling Sprague-Dawley rat2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID29363Dissociation constant (pKa)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID85668In vitro effect on LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) level in fat-fed hamsters treated for 10 days at 200 umol/kg/day2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-17, Volume: 46, Issue:15
Synthesis and structure-activity studies of novel orally active non-terpenoic 2,3-oxidosqualene cyclase inhibitors.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1209974Inhibition of CYP3A4 in human liver microsomes using midazolam as substrate after 8 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID406853Antiplasmodial activity against chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum FCR32007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Jul, Volume: 51, Issue:7
Atorvastatin is 10-fold more active in vitro than other statins against Plasmodium falciparum.
AID1289043Cmax in healthy human subjects assessed as simvastatin acid at 40 mg with water administered as single dose measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID503298Inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as blocking of interaction of CFL1-LimK2 by by EYFP and YFP Venus fragment based reporter gene assay2006Nature chemical biology, Jun, Volume: 2, Issue:6
Identifying off-target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells.
AID313913Selectivity, ratio of IC50 for rat hepatocyte to IC50 for rat L6 myocyte2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Hepatoselectivity of statins: design and synthesis of 4-sulfamoyl pyrroles as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID384745Partition coefficient, log P by octanol-water partitioning method2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID678715Inhibition of human CYP2D6 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 4-methylaminoethyl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1860215n-Octanol/PBS partition coefficient, logD of the compound at pH 7.42022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-05, Volume: 238Design and synthesis of new quinoline derivatives as selective C-RAF kinase inhibitors with potent anticancer activity.
AID384761Hepatotoxicity in guinea pig assessed as hepatocellular degeneration2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID467612Fraction unbound in human plasma2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 44, Issue:11
Prediction of volume of distribution values in human using immobilized artificial membrane partitioning coefficients, the fraction of compound ionized and plasma protein binding data.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID681127TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of LDS-751 efflux in NIH-3T3-G185 cells2001Biochemical and biophysical research communications, Nov-30, Volume: 289, Issue:2
Active transport of fluorescent P-glycoprotein substrates: evaluation as markers and interaction with inhibitors.
AID1289054AUC (0 to 24 hrs) in healthy human subjects assessed as simvastatin acid at 40 mg with 200 ml grape fruit juice drug administered as single dose on day 3 of grape fruit juice challenge measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1220875Apparent permeability of the compound in P-gp knockdown human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by reverse-phase liquid chromatography with triple-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Use of transporter knockdown Caco-2 cells to investigate the in vitro efflux of statin drugs.
AID1443980Inhibition of human BSEP expressed in fall armyworm sf9 cell plasma membrane vesicles assessed as reduction in vesicle-associated [3H]-taurocholate transport preincubated for 10 mins prior to ATP addition measured after 15 mins in presence of [3H]-tauroch2010Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Dec, Volume: 118, Issue:2
Interference with bile salt export pump function is a susceptibility factor for human liver injury in drug development.
AID678959TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake in OATP1B1-expressing HEK293 cells2005Pharmacogenetics and genomics, Jul, Volume: 15, Issue:7
Functional characterization of SLCO1B1 (OATP-C) variants, SLCO1B1*5, SLCO1B1*15 and SLCO1B1*15+C1007G, by using transient expression systems of HeLa and HEK293 cells.
AID1289044Tmax in healthy human subjects assessed as simvastatin acid at 40 mg with water administered as single dose measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1210016Inhibition of CYP2C8 in human liver microsomes using paclitaxel as substrate after 8 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID1168888Hypolipidiemic activity in tyloxapol-induced ICR mouse hyperlipidemic model assessed as increase in serum HDL-cholesterol level at 17 mg/kg, ip after 24 hrs2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
Synthesis and highly potent hypolipidemic activity of alpha-asarone- and fibrate-based 2-acyl and 2-alkyl phenols as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID1128731Inhibition of squalene synthase in rat liver microsomes assessed as decrease in conversion of [3H]FPP to squalene2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Design of novel potent antihyperlipidemic agents with antioxidant/anti-inflammatory properties: exploiting phenothiazine's strong antioxidant activity.
AID384743Selectivity index, ratio of IC50 for cholesterol synthesis in rat L6 cells to IC50 for cholesterol synthesis in rat hepatocytes2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID385211Myotoxicity in guinea pig assessed as drug dose causing >10 fold increase in plasma creatine kinase activity relative to control2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID83874In vitro effect on total plasma cholesterol(TC) level in fat-fed hamsters treated for 10 days at 200 umol/kg/day2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-17, Volume: 46, Issue:15
Synthesis and structure-activity studies of novel orally active non-terpenoic 2,3-oxidosqualene cyclase inhibitors.
AID300168Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in rat liver hepatocytes after 4 hrs2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 15, Issue:16
Discovery of pyrrole-based hepatoselective ligands as potent inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase.
AID681381TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of calcein-AM efflux in MDR1-expressing MDCK cells2005Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 33, Issue:4
Differential interaction of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coa reductase inhibitors with ABCB1, ABCC2, and OATP1B1.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID406852Antiplasmodial activity against chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum Bre12007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Jul, Volume: 51, Issue:7
Atorvastatin is 10-fold more active in vitro than other statins against Plasmodium falciparum.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID406848Antiplasmodial activity against chloroquine-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum D62007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Jul, Volume: 51, Issue:7
Atorvastatin is 10-fold more active in vitro than other statins against Plasmodium falciparum.
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID308508Inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-15, Volume: 17, Issue:16
Design and synthesis of hepatoselective, pyrrole-based HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID1764181Hypolipidemic activity against oleic acid/palmitic acid-induced hyperlipidemia in human HepG2 cells assessed as reduction in triglycerides content2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-01, Volume: 47Phenolic compounds from the leaves of Crataegus pinnatifida Bge. var. major N.E.Br. And their lipid-lowering effects.
AID300171Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in C57/BL6 mouse at 30 mg/kg, po by MAICS assay2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 15, Issue:16
Discovery of pyrrole-based hepatoselective ligands as potent inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase.
AID679345TP_TRANSPORTER: transepithelial transport in L-MDR1 cells2004Pharmaceutical research, Sep, Volume: 21, Issue:9
Interactions of human P-glycoprotein with simvastatin, simvastatin acid, and atorvastatin.
AID1289052Tmax in healthy human subjects assessed as simvastatin acid at 40 mg with 200 ml grape fruit juice drug administered as single dose on day 3 of grape fruit juice challenge measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID1220877Apparent permeability of the compound in MRP2 knockdown human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by reverse-phase liquid chromatography with triple-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Use of transporter knockdown Caco-2 cells to investigate the in vitro efflux of statin drugs.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1443989Inhibition of recombinant human BSEP expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cell plasma membrane vesicles assessed as reduction in ATP-dependent [3H]-taurocholate uptake in to vesicles preincubated for 10 mins followed by ATP addition measured after 10 to 2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID977602Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B3-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID1289049Elimination half life in healthy human subjects at 40 mg with 200 ml grape fruit juice drug administered as single dose on day 3 of grape fruit juice challenge measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID736211Antidyslipidemic activity against triton WR1339-induced hyperlipidemia in rat assessed as reduction in plasma triglyceride level at 56 umol/kg, ip after 24 hrs (Rvb = 580%)2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 56, Issue:8
New multifunctional Di-tert-butylphenoloctahydro(pyrido/benz)oxazine derivatives with antioxidant, antihyperlipidemic, and antidiabetic action.
AID678951TP_TRANSPORTER: transepithelial transport of ritonavir in the presence of Simvastatin at a concentration of 5uM in L-MDR1 cells2004Pharmaceutical research, Sep, Volume: 21, Issue:9
Interactions of human P-glycoprotein with simvastatin, simvastatin acid, and atorvastatin.
AID625277FDA Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base Benchmark Dataset (LTKB-BD) drugs of less concern for DILI2011Drug discovery today, Aug, Volume: 16, Issue:15-16
FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
AID406851Antiplasmodial activity against chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum W22007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Jul, Volume: 51, Issue:7
Atorvastatin is 10-fold more active in vitro than other statins against Plasmodium falciparum.
AID219545Effective dose (80%) required to inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis in rat after oral administration2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-28, Volume: 43, Issue:26
A novel series of 4-piperidinopyridine and 4-piperidinopyrimidine inhibitors of 2,3-oxidosqualene cyclase-lanosterol synthase.
AID384748Reduction in plasma total cholesterol level in guinea pig after 10 days2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID680266TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Pravastatin uptake (Pravastatin: 0.5 uM, Simvastatin: 50 uM) in Oatp1-expressing 293c18 cells1999The Journal of biological chemistry, Dec-24, Volume: 274, Issue:52
A novel human hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP2). Identification of a liver-specific human organic anion transporting polypeptide and identification of rat and human hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor transporters.
AID588210Human drug-induced liver injury (DILI) modelling dataset from Ekins et al2010Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Dec, Volume: 38, Issue:12
A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.
AID313917Incidence of myalgia in human2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Hepatoselectivity of statins: design and synthesis of 4-sulfamoyl pyrroles as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID570998Antimalarial activity against Plasmodium falciparum infected in mouse assessed as parasitemia at 40 mg/kg, ip, qd administered 3 days post infection for 6 days measured after 6 days (Rvb =8.0+/-1.6 %)2008Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 52, Issue:11
Statins alone are ineffective in cerebral malaria but potentiate artesunate.
AID1636431Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2D6-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 36.2 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of N2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID300169Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in rat L6 cells after 3 hrs2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 15, Issue:16
Discovery of pyrrole-based hepatoselective ligands as potent inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase.
AID313912Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in rat L6 myocyte2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Hepatoselectivity of statins: design and synthesis of 4-sulfamoyl pyrroles as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID681370TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of calcein-AM efflux in MRP2-expressing MDCK cells2005Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 33, Issue:4
Differential interaction of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coa reductase inhibitors with ABCB1, ABCC2, and OATP1B1.
AID1289053Elimination half life in healthy human subjects assessed as simvastatin acid at 40 mg with 200 ml grape fruit juice drug administered as single dose on day 3 of grape fruit juice challenge measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID238872Inhibitory constant against HMG-CoA reductase with alpha asarone2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 15, Issue:4
Molecular docking of the highly hypolipidemic agent alpha-asarone with the catalytic portion of HMG-CoA reductase.
AID682109TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Taurocholate uptake (Taurocholate: 0.5 uM, Simvastatin: 50 uM) in OATP-C-expressing 293c18 cells1999The Journal of biological chemistry, Dec-24, Volume: 274, Issue:52
A novel human hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP2). Identification of a liver-specific human organic anion transporting polypeptide and identification of rat and human hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor transporters.
AID1289039Cmax in healthy human subjects at 40 mg with water administered as single dose measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID384752Safety index, ratio of ED50 for reduction in plasma total cholesterol level to drug dose not causing >2.5 fold increase in plasma creatine kinase in guinea pig2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID1153180Inhibition of FTase-mediated RAS prenylation in RASMC at 2 uM after 72 hrs by Western blotting analysis2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-01, Volume: 24, Issue:13
Farnesyltransferase inhibitors: CAAX mimetics based on different biaryl scaffolds.
AID1210014Inhibition of recombinant CYP2J2 (unknown origin)-mediated astemizole O-demethylation assessed as remaining activity at 30 uM after 5 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis relative to control2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID384747Inhibition of hepatic cholesterol synthesis in po dosed Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as incorporation of [14C]acetate into hepatic sterols2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID628455Antidyslipidemic activity in rat hyperlipidemic model assessed as decrease is plasma total cholesterol level at 56 umol/kg, ip after 24 hrs relative to control2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-11, Volume: 54, Issue:15
Novel benzoxazine and benzothiazine derivatives as multifunctional antihyperlipidemic agents.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID404304Effect on human MRP2-mediated estradiol-17-beta-glucuronide transport in Sf9 cells inverted membrane vesicles relative to control2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-12, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Prediction and identification of drug interactions with the human ATP-binding cassette transporter multidrug-resistance associated protein 2 (MRP2; ABCC2).
AID291756Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in rat hepatocytes2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-15, Volume: 17, Issue:16
Design and synthesis of novel, conformationally restricted HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID1473798Ratio of drug concentration at steady state in human at 5 to 80 mg, po QD after 24 hrs to IC50 for human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1193497Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound PBS at pH 7.4 at RT after 24 hrs by shake-flask method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1289041Elimination half life in healthy human subjects at 40 mg with water administered as single dose measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID678716Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using diethoxyfluorescein as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID1193498Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound simulated gastric fluid at pH 1.2 at RT after 24 hrs by shake-flask method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID1454766Inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase (unknown origin) using [14C]-HMG-CoA as substrate after 5 mins in presence of NADPH2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-22, Volume: 61, Issue:6
Natural-Products-Inspired Use of the gem-Dimethyl Group in Medicinal Chemistry.
AID308511Inhibition of acute cholesterol synthesis in mouse at 1 mg/kg2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-15, Volume: 17, Issue:16
Design and synthesis of hepatoselective, pyrrole-based HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID244638Effect on cholesterol lowering in male Beagle dog at an oral dose of 4 mkd for 3 days2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-25, Volume: 48, Issue:17
Novel 2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-2-carboxylic acids: highly potent and subtype-selective PPARalpha agonists with potent hypolipidemic activity.
AID243422log (1/Km) value for human liver microsome cytochrome P450 3A42005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-15, Volume: 15, Issue:18
Modeling K(m) values using electrotopological state: substrates for cytochrome P450 3A4-mediated metabolism.
AID1636371Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 21.7 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of N2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID291755Inhibition of HMGCoA reductase2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-15, Volume: 17, Issue:16
Design and synthesis of novel, conformationally restricted HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID678717Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-benzyloxyquinoline as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID467613Volume of distribution at steady state in human2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 44, Issue:11
Prediction of volume of distribution values in human using immobilized artificial membrane partitioning coefficients, the fraction of compound ionized and plasma protein binding data.
AID678712Inhibition of human CYP1A2 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using ethoxyresorufin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1449628Inhibition of human BSEP expressed in baculovirus transfected fall armyworm Sf21 cell membranes vesicles assessed as reduction in ATP-dependent [3H]-taurocholate transport into vesicles incubated for 5 mins by Topcount based rapid filtration method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Dec, Volume: 40, Issue:12
Mitigating the inhibition of human bile salt export pump by drugs: opportunities provided by physicochemical property modulation, in silico modeling, and structural modification.
AID1289050AUC (0 to 24 hrs) in healthy human subjects at 40 mg with 200 ml grape fruit juice drug administered as single dose on day 3 of grape fruit juice challenge measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID1193496Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound in water at RT after 24 hrs by shake-flask method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID1193499Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound simulated intestinal fluid at pH 6.8 at RT after 24 hrs by shake-flask method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID1220876Apparent permeability of the compound in BCRP knockdown human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by reverse-phase liquid chromatography with triple-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Use of transporter knockdown Caco-2 cells to investigate the in vitro efflux of statin drugs.
AID1220874Apparent permeability of the compound in vector transfected human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by reverse-phase liquid chromatography with triple-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Use of transporter knockdown Caco-2 cells to investigate the in vitro efflux of statin drugs.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID238540Inhibitory constant against HMG-CoA reductase2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 15, Issue:4
Molecular docking of the highly hypolipidemic agent alpha-asarone with the catalytic portion of HMG-CoA reductase.
AID699540Inhibition of human liver OATP1B3 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID308510Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in rat myocyte2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-15, Volume: 17, Issue:16
Design and synthesis of hepatoselective, pyrrole-based HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID241793Inhibitory concentration against 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 15, Issue:4
Three-dimensional quantitative structure (3-D QSAR) activity relationship studies on imidazolyl and N-pyrrolyl heptenoates as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGR) inhibitors by comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA).
AID679461TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Rhodamine 123 transport in 3T3-G185 cells2001Pharmaceutical research, Jun, Volume: 18, Issue:6
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) characterized as direct inhibitors of P-glycoprotein.
AID1443992Total Cmax in human administered as single dose2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID1365723Solubility of compound in Middlebrook 7H9 broth media at pH 6.4 at 200 uM after 90 mins by UV-VIS spectrophotometric method2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 11-01, Volume: 25, Issue:21
The antitubercular activity of various nitro(triazole/imidazole)-based compounds.
AID412236Lipophilicity, log P of the compound2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 17, Issue:1
Comparison of benzil and trifluoromethyl ketone (TFK)-mediated carboxylesterase inhibition using classical and 3D-quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis.
AID310070Effect on FTase mediated Ras farnesylation in human aortic smooth muscle cells at 2 uM after 72 hrs by Western blot analysis2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 17, Issue:22
Peptidomimetic inhibitors of farnesyltransferase with high in vitro activity and significant cellular potency.
AID1193492Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound in water at RT after 4 hrs by 96 well plate method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID1128712Antioxidant activity in rat liver microsome membrane assessed as inhibition of lipid peroxidation after 45 mins by TBARS-based spectrophotometric assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Design of novel potent antihyperlipidemic agents with antioxidant/anti-inflammatory properties: exploiting phenothiazine's strong antioxidant activity.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID313911Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in rat hepatocyte2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Hepatoselectivity of statins: design and synthesis of 4-sulfamoyl pyrroles as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID421139Antidiabetic activity in Beagle dog assessed as reduction in total cholesterol level at 4 mg/kg, po once daily for 14 days relative to control2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 52, Issue:14
Discovery of a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) modulator with balanced PPARalpha activity for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia.
AID406850Antiplasmodial activity against chloroquine-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum IMT0312007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Jul, Volume: 51, Issue:7
Atorvastatin is 10-fold more active in vitro than other statins against Plasmodium falciparum.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID241168Inhibitory concentration against HMG-CoA reductase2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 15, Issue:4
Molecular docking of the highly hypolipidemic agent alpha-asarone with the catalytic portion of HMG-CoA reductase.
AID1289046AUC (0 to 24 hrs) in healthy human subjects assessed as simvastatin acid at 40 mg with water administered as single dose measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID678714Inhibition of human CYP2C19 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 3-butyryl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1168897Inhibition of human HMG-CoA reductase after 30 mins2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
Synthesis and highly potent hypolipidemic activity of alpha-asarone- and fibrate-based 2-acyl and 2-alkyl phenols as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID503308Antiproliferative activity against human PC3 cells at 30 uM after 120 hrs by MTT assay relative to DMSO2006Nature chemical biology, Jun, Volume: 2, Issue:6
Identifying off-target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells.
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID1128737In vivo antidyslipidemic activity against Triton WR 1339-induced hyperlipidemic Wistar rat model assessed as decrease in total cholesterol level in plasma at 56 umol/kg, ip administered as single dose 1 hr after Triton WR 1339 challenge measured after 24 2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Design of novel potent antihyperlipidemic agents with antioxidant/anti-inflammatory properties: exploiting phenothiazine's strong antioxidant activity.
AID1473796AUC in human at 5 to 80 mg, po QD after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID520097Antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium berghei ANKA infected in C57BL/6 mice (Mus musculus) assessed as parasitemia at 40 ug/g, intraperitoneally on days 2,4 and 62008Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Apr, Volume: 52, Issue:4
Simvastatin treatment shows no effect on the incidence of cerebral malaria or parasitemia during experimental malaria.
AID244641Effect on cholesterol lowering in male Beagle dog at an oral dose of 4 mkd for 15 days2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-25, Volume: 48, Issue:17
Novel 2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-2-carboxylic acids: highly potent and subtype-selective PPARalpha agonists with potent hypolipidemic activity.
AID1168896Inhibition of human HMG-CoA reductase activity using NADPH by spectrophotometrically2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
Synthesis and highly potent hypolipidemic activity of alpha-asarone- and fibrate-based 2-acyl and 2-alkyl phenols as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1860214Aqueous solubility of compound by HPLC analysis2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-05, Volume: 238Design and synthesis of new quinoline derivatives as selective C-RAF kinase inhibitors with potent anticancer activity.
AID385189Myotoxicity in po dosed weanling Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as drug dose causing >2.5 fold increase in plasma creatine kinase activity relative to control2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID977599Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B1-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID1193495Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound in simulated intestinal fluid at pH 6.8 at RT after 4 hrs by 96 well plate method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID737909Cytotoxicity against human HS68 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-09, Volume: 56, Issue:9
Design and synthesis of dual-action inhibitors targeting histone deacetylases and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase for cancer treatment.
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID628456Antidyslipidemic activity in rat hyperlipidemic model assessed as decrease is plasma LDL level at 56 umol/kg, ip after 24 hrs relative to control2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-11, Volume: 54, Issue:15
Novel benzoxazine and benzothiazine derivatives as multifunctional antihyperlipidemic agents.
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID1193493Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound in PBS at pH 7.4 at RT after 4 hrs by 96 well plate method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID1218865Inhibition of OATP1B1 (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293 cells using estrone-3-sulfate substrate2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Aug, Volume: 40, Issue:8
The development, characterization, and application of an OATP1B1 inhibition assay in drug discovery.
AID680258TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Taurocholate uptake (Taurocholate: 0.5 uM, Simvastatin: 50 uM) in Oatp1-expressing 293c18 cells1999The Journal of biological chemistry, Dec-24, Volume: 274, Issue:52
A novel human hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP2). Identification of a liver-specific human organic anion transporting polypeptide and identification of rat and human hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor transporters.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID520096Antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium berghei ANKA infected in C57BL/6 mice (Mus musculus) assessed as parasitemia at 0.5 ug/g, intraperitoneal on day 2, 1 ug/g, intraperitoneal on day 4 followed by 2 ug/g on day 62008Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Apr, Volume: 52, Issue:4
Simvastatin treatment shows no effect on the incidence of cerebral malaria or parasitemia during experimental malaria.
AID1218863Inhibition of OATP1B1 (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293 cells using pitavastatin substrate2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Aug, Volume: 40, Issue:8
The development, characterization, and application of an OATP1B1 inhibition assay in drug discovery.
AID1638893Lipid lowering activity in human HepG2 cells assessed as reduction in oleic acid-induced lipid accumulation at 10 uM after 24 hrs by oil red O staining based spectrophotometric method2019Journal of natural products, 04-26, Volume: 82, Issue:4
Methylsulfonylated Polyketides Produced by Neosartorya udagawae HDN13-313 via Exogenous Addition of Small Molecules.
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID1210013Inhibition of recombinant CYP2J2 (unknown origin)-mediated terfenadine hydroxylation assessed as remaining activity at 30 uM after 5 mins by LC-MS analysis relative to control2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID384742Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in rat L6 cells assessed as incorporation of [14C]acetate into cholesterol2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
(3R,5S,E)-7-(4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-(methyl(1-methyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid (BMS-644950): a rationally designed orally efficacious 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor with
AID1128733Inhibition of human recombinant COX-2 assessed as PGF2-alpha formation using arachidonic acid as substrate at 20 uM by enzyme immunoassay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Design of novel potent antihyperlipidemic agents with antioxidant/anti-inflammatory properties: exploiting phenothiazine's strong antioxidant activity.
AID1128738In vivo antidyslipidemic activity against Triton WR 1339-induced hyperlipidemic Wistar rat model assessed as decrease in LDL-cholesterol level in plasma at 56 umol/kg, ip administered as single dose 1 hr after Triton WR 1339 challenge measured after 24 hr2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Design of novel potent antihyperlipidemic agents with antioxidant/anti-inflammatory properties: exploiting phenothiazine's strong antioxidant activity.
AID1128714Antioxidant activity assessed as DPPH radical scavenging activity after 30 mins2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Design of novel potent antihyperlipidemic agents with antioxidant/anti-inflammatory properties: exploiting phenothiazine's strong antioxidant activity.
AID1251979Antihyperlipidemic activity in Triton WR1339-induced hyperlipidemic rat assessed as reduction in plasma total cholesterol at 56 umol/kg, ip dosed 1 hr after Triton WR1339 challenge and measured 24 hrs post dose relative to control2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 23, Issue:21
Antihyperlipidemic morpholine derivatives with antioxidant activity: An investigation of the aromatic substitution.
AID1283271Inhibition of HMGCoA reductase in Dhcr7-deficient mouse Neuro2a cells assessed as decrease in 7-DHC levels at 1 uM by LC-MS/GC-MS analysis2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 59, Issue:3
The Effect of Small Molecules on Sterol Homeostasis: Measuring 7-Dehydrocholesterol in Dhcr7-Deficient Neuro2a Cells and Human Fibroblasts.
AID1289048Tmax in healthy human subjects at 40 mg with 200 ml grape fruit juice drug administered as single dose on day 3 of grape fruit juice challenge measured upto 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2004British journal of clinical pharmacology, Jul, Volume: 58, Issue:1
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.
AID1502952Reduction in triglyceride level in patient with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia at 40 mg/day2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-10, Volume: 140Lipid lowering agents of natural origin: An account of some promising chemotypes.
AID616640Inhibition of rat Ftase in RASMC cells assessed as reduction in Ras prenylation at 2 uM after 72 hrs by Western blot analysis2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-15, Volume: 21, Issue:18
Thiazole- and imidazole-containing peptidomimetic inhibitors of protein farnesyltransferase.
AID681126TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Rhodamine 123 efflux in NIH-3T3-G185 cells2001Biochemical and biophysical research communications, Nov-30, Volume: 289, Issue:2
Active transport of fluorescent P-glycoprotein substrates: evaluation as markers and interaction with inhibitors.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID628457Antidyslipidemic activity in rat hyperlipidemic model assessed as decrease is plasma triglyceride level at 56 umol/kg, ip after 24 hrs relative to control2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-11, Volume: 54, Issue:15
Novel benzoxazine and benzothiazine derivatives as multifunctional antihyperlipidemic agents.
AID1128739In vivo antidyslipidemic activity against Triton WR 1339-induced hyperlipidemic Wistar rat model assessed as decrease in triglyceride level in plasma at 56 umol/kg, ip administered as single dose 1 hr after Triton WR 1339 challenge measured after 24 hrs2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Design of novel potent antihyperlipidemic agents with antioxidant/anti-inflammatory properties: exploiting phenothiazine's strong antioxidant activity.
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID737911Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-09, Volume: 56, Issue:9
Design and synthesis of dual-action inhibitors targeting histone deacetylases and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase for cancer treatment.
AID300170Selectivity index, ratio of IC50 for rat L6 cells to IC50 for rat hepatocytes2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 15, Issue:16
Discovery of pyrrole-based hepatoselective ligands as potent inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase.
AID1232319Volume of distribution at steady state in wild type mouse2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 58, Issue:15
Volume of Distribution in Drug Design.
AID686947qHTS for small molecule inhibitors of Yes1 kinase: Primary Screen2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 23, Issue:15
Identification of potent Yes1 kinase inhibitors using a library screening approach.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
AID1346838Rat hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (Lanosterol biosynthesis pathway)1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 29, Issue:5
3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. 4. Side chain ester derivatives of mevinolin.
AID1346838Rat hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (Lanosterol biosynthesis pathway)2001The American journal of cardiology, Mar-08, Volume: 87, Issue:5A
Preclinical and clinical pharmacology of Rosuvastatin, a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor.
AID1346838Rat hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (Lanosterol biosynthesis pathway)2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-15, Volume: 17, Issue:16
Design and synthesis of hepatoselective, pyrrole-based HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
AID1346822Human hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (Lanosterol biosynthesis pathway)2001Science (New York, N.Y.), May-11, Volume: 292, Issue:5519
Structural mechanism for statin inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase.
AID1346822Human hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (Lanosterol biosynthesis pathway)1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-16, Volume: 35, Issue:21
3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. 9. The synthesis and biological evaluation of novel simvastatin analogs.
AID1159550Human Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) Inhibitor Screening2015Nature cell biology, Nov, Volume: 17, Issue:11
6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase links oxidative PPP, lipogenesis and tumour growth by inhibiting LKB1-AMPK signalling.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (8,047)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-199064 (0.80)18.7374
1990's1050 (13.05)18.2507
2000's2932 (36.44)29.6817
2010's3285 (40.82)24.3611
2020's716 (8.90)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 106.08

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index106.08 (24.57)
Research Supply Index9.23 (2.92)
Research Growth Index5.98 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index197.91 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (106.08)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials1,730 (20.49%)5.53%
Reviews561 (6.65%)6.00%
Case Studies486 (5.76%)4.05%
Observational49 (0.58%)0.25%
Other5,616 (66.52%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (538)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
An Open-label, Sequential Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin When Coadministered With Albiglutide in Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT01147692]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-19Completed
A Phase I, Single-center, Drug Interaction Study Between Simvastatin, Atorvastatin, Rosuvastatin, and GSK2248761 in Healthy Subjects. [NCT01138072]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Effect of Simvastatin on Sepsis and Febrile Neutropenia in Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT05133310]Phase 4108 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-19Recruiting
A Single- and Multiple-Ascending Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of LY3502970 in Healthy Subjects [NCT03929744]Phase 1133 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-12Completed
The Cardiovascular and Inflammatory Effects of Statin Therapy in Patients With COPD [NCT01151306]Phase 470 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
The Additive Anti-inflammatory Effect of Simvastatin in Combination With Inhaled Corticosteroids on p38 MAPK in Asthma [NCT01266434]Phase 344 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Donor Simvastatin Treatment in Organ Transplantation [NCT01160978]Phase 2/Phase 384 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-01Completed
Effect of Aminobiphosphonates and Statins on Circulating Vgamma9Vdelta2-T Cells [NCT01179464]19 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
A Single Center, Open Label, Randomized Study to Compare the Effect of Vytorin (Simvastatin/Ezetimibe) 10/20mg Versus Atorvastatin 20mg on ApoB/ApoA1 Ratio in Subjects With Diabetes [NCT01185236]Phase 4132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-09-30Not yet recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of Simvastatin to Cetuximab in K-ras Mutant Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients. A Single-Arm, Multicenter, Phase II Study Using a Simon Two Stage Design. [NCT01190462]Phase 251 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-08-31Recruiting
Effect of Simvastatin on the Prognosis of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC); A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Multicenter Study [NCT04133792]Phase 3700 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-01Recruiting
Effects of High and Low Doses of Metformin, Fenofibrate and Simvastatin, Administered Together and in Sequence With Lifestyle Intervention on Lipid Profile, Glucose Metabolism, Low-grade Inflammation and Hemostasis in Patient's Blood Plasma in Type 2 Diab [NCT01101204]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-07-31Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Lipid-Altering Efficacy and Safety of the Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Tablet Versus Rosuvastatin in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00090298]Phase 32,815 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Begin With The Right Patients With Dual-Inhibition Action Therapy Through Vytorin for Newly Diagnosed Dyslipidemia Patients [NCT00654628]Phase 4173 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-01Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Lipid-Altering Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe (+) Simvastatin Versus Atorvastatin in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00166504]Phase 4203 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Statin Therapeutic Interchange by Pharmacist Collaborative Practice Process [NCT01222182]260 participants (Actual)Observational2009-09-30Completed
Placebo-controlled, Double-blinded Phase III Trial of XELIRI/FOLFIRI + Simvastatin Followed by Simvastatin Maintenance in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01238094]Phase 3258 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-04-30Recruiting
A Randomized, Two-treatment, Two-period, Two-sequence, Single Dose, Crossover Bioequivalence Study of Simvastatin 80 mg Tablets of Dr. Reddy's to be Compared With Zocor® 80 mg Tablets of Merck & Co. Inc., USA in Healthy Adult Subjects Under Fasting Condit [NCT01167894]Phase 172 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Prevention of Progression of Portal Hypertension in Compensated Cirrhosis Using Selective Hepatic Vasodilators. A Double-blind, Multicenter,Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01282398]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-04-30Not yet recruiting
Simvastatin Effect on the Incidence of Acute Lung Injury/Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome [NCT01195428]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Minimal enrollment)
A Phase 1, Open Label, Fixed Sequence Study To Investigate The Effect Of Multiple Doses Of PF-04531083 On Simvastatin And Simvastatin Acid Pharmacokinetics Following Single Dose Of Simvastatin in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01103739]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
"A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Factorial Design Study to Evaluate the Lipid-Altering Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Tablet in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia" [NCT00092664]Phase 31,104 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Single-site Study of High Dose Simvastatin Treatment for Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Impact on Vascular Perfusion and Oxidative Damage [NCT03896217]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-16Recruiting
A Randomized, Two-treatment, Two-period, Two-sequence, Single Dose, Crossover Bioequivalence Study of Simvastatin 80 mg Tablets of Dr. Reddy's to be Compared With Zocor® 80 mg Tablets of Merck & Co. Inc., USA in Healthy Adult Subjects Under Fed Conditions [NCT01167933]Phase 144 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
A Single-centre Open Label Study to Investigate the Effect of Repeat Doses of SB-649868 on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin and Atorvastatin in Healthy Male Volunteers. [NCT01299597]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-18Completed
Effect of Simvastatin on Endothelial Function in Premenopausal Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [NCT00739050]Phase 44 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-19Terminated
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Tolerability and Efficacy of the Co-Administration of Simvastatin 20 mg/Day and Fenofibrate 160 mg/Day Compared to Simvastatin 20 mg/Day Alone for 12 Weeks of Treatment in Patie [NCT00092157]Phase 3571 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-01Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Groups, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Administration of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Tablet 10/20 mg Versus Doubling the Dose of Simvastatin 20 mg [Simvastatin 40 mg] [NCT00423579]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-01Completed
MICROS-Pilot Study Microcirculation In Acute Coronary Syndromes; Effect of Pre-treatment of High Dose Rosuvastatin on Coronary Microcirculation in Primary PCI [NCT01382472]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A Phase I, Single-Centre Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Doses of LY3526318, and to Investigate the Effect of LY3526318 on Metformin and Simvastatin Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Male Japanese Partic [NCT05580250]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-11-22Withdrawn(stopped due to The sponsor made a business decision to withdraw the trial.)
Comparison Of Efficacy Of Locally Delivered 1.2% Simvastatin And 1% Metformin Gel In Chronic Periodontitis: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT02372656]Phase 2/Phase 398 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Hypolipidemic, Cardioprotective and Antioxidant Effect of Zingiber Officinale L. Extract in Hypertensive Patients: A Clinical Approach [NCT05682911]Early Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-01Completed
7T Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Skeletal Muscle Biopsy Findings in Statin [NCT04507373]Phase 43 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-17Terminated(stopped due to No grant obtained. Enrolled participants were not assigned to the intervention and was study terminated)
Simvastatin Treatment of Pachyonychia Congenita [NCT01382511]10 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-07-31Not yet recruiting
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CLINICAL EFFICACY OF SUBGINGIVALLY DELIVERED 1.2% ATORVASTATIN AND 1.2% SIMVASTATIN IN TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PERIODONTITIS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL [NCT02060032]Phase 2/Phase 396 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Simvastatin as a Treatment for Pulmonary Hypertension [NCT00180713]Phase 1/Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Platelet - Rich Fibrin Combined With 1.2mg Simvastatin for the Treatment of 3 - Wall Intrabony Defects in Chronic Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT02120872]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
"A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Factorial Design Study to Evaluate the Lipid-Altering Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Tablet in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia" [NCT00092651]Phase 31,398 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Completed
Phase II Study of Simvastatin, Zoledronic Acid, Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Methylprednisolone for Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma [NCT01332617]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Investigators no longer interested in activating study)
Evaluate The Lipid-Lowering Efficacy and Safety of Vytorin in Comparison With Atorvastatin in Hypercholesterolaemic Patients With Coronary Artery Disease [NCT00442897]Phase 4229 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Pre-diabetic & Pre-hypertensive Subjects Using Multiple Risks Reduction Strategy: A Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01364675]8,900 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-01-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Cilostazol on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin in Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT01383395]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
SIMOX - A Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo Controlled Study of Simvastatins Possible Effect on Oxidative Stress on Healthy Volunteers [NCT02256254]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Carotid Plaque Characteristics by MRI in AIM-HIGH [NCT01178320]230 participants (Actual)Observational2008-03-31Completed
The Cardiac Protective Effect of Simvastatin on Cardiac Surgery: a Double Blind, Randomised Clinical Trial [NCT01178710]151 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ezetimibe in Coadministration With Simvastatin in the Therapy of Adolescents With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00129402]Phase 3248 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
High-dose Simvastatin for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: Is it Better? [NCT01077206]Phase 2/Phase 3255 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Comparative Evaluation Of 1.2% Atorvastatin and 1.2% Simvastatin Gel Local Drug Delivery And Redelivery In Chronic Periodontitis Subjects With Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. [NCT03745300]Phase 2/Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-03Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, 3-way Crossover Phase I Study in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Treated With Metformin to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Simvastatin During Coadministration With AZD1656 and to Evaluate the Pharmacokinet [NCT01096940]Phase 144 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
The Effect of Simvastatin on Systemic Inflammation in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Subjects: A Pilot Study [NCT01092572]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of funding)
Synergistic Effect of Simvastatin and Ezetimibe on Lipid and Pro-inflammatory Profiles in Pre-diabetic Subjects [NCT01103648]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
The Evaluation of Vitiligous Lesions Repigmentation After the Administration of Atorvastatin Calcium Salt and Simvastatin-acid Sodium Salt in Patients With Active Vitiligo (EVRAAS) [NCT03247400]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-01Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lapaquistat Acetate 50 mg or Placebo When Co-administered With Statins in Subjects With Hypercholesterolemia, With an Optional Open-Label Extension [NCT00532311]Phase 3411 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Overall profile of the compound does not offer significant clinical advantage to patients over currently available lipid lowering agents)
The Effect of 28-day Simvastatin Administration on Emotional Processing, Reward Learning, Working Memory, and Salivary Cortisol in Healthy Volunteers At-risk for Depression [NCT04973800]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-05Recruiting
Prospective Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of SimvaSTATin in the Prevention of COPD Exacerbations (STATCOPE) [NCT01061671]Phase 3885 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Futility)
Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Diagnose Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms [NCT03653663]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-01Active, not recruiting
A Window of Opportunity Study to Evaluate the Role of the Combination of Metformin and Simvastatin as a Neoadjuvant Therapy in Invasive Bladder Cancer [NCT02360618]Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Recruiting
A Multi-country, Multicenter, Single-arm, Open-label Study to Document the Safety, Tolerability and Effect of Alirocumab on Atherogenic Lipoproteins in High Cardio-vascular Risk Patients With Severe Hypercholesterolemia Not Adequately Controlled With Conv [NCT02476006]Phase 3998 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-23Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study of Patients With Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Mellitus Not Adequately Controlled With Simvastatin or Atorvastatin: Comparison of Switching to Combination Tablet Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Versus Switch [NCT00862251]Phase 3808 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Effect of Statin Therapy on Mortality in Patients With Ventilator Associated Pneumonia [NCT05230472]Phase 4161 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-01Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Arm, 6-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Versus Atorvastatin in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome and Hypercholesterolemia at High Risk for Coronary Heart Disease [NCT00409773]Phase 31,143 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Simvastatin as a Neuroprotective Treatment for Parkinson's Disease: a Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo Controlled Futility Study in Patients of Moderate Severity. [NCT02787590]Phase 2235 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-08Completed
Pharmacokinetics of Single Oral Doses of 40 mg Simvastatin and Its Metabolite Simvastatin Acid With and Without Concomitant Administration of Telmisartan 80 mg Daily, Given Orally Over 6 Days. A Randomised, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind (for Telmisarta [NCT02187536]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-04-30Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Stratified, Active-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Acupuncture and Moxibustion for Hyperlipidemias [NCT02269046]210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-12-31Not yet recruiting
Anti-Platelet and Statin Therapy to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Pilot Study [NCT02285738]Early Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-30Completed
A 12-week, Double-blind, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Fixed Combinations of Fenofibrate / Simvastatin 145/20mg and Fenofibrate / Simvastatin 145/40mg Tablets vs. Matching Monotherapies in Dyslipidemic Subjects at High Risk of Car [NCT01674712]Phase 3575 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Can Simvastatin Significantly Reduce the Amount of Immunosuppressive Medication Required by Patients With Sight Threatening Uveitis? A Phase 2b, Single Site, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blinded Trial. [NCT02252328]Phase 2/Phase 350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Active, not recruiting
Simvastatin Effect in Portal Hypertension Measured by Portal Hemodynamic Gradient and Azygos Vein Doppler in Echoendoscopy [NCT02134626]Phase 334 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Real World Evidence Study for Assessing Statin Use for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Primary Care in Brazil [NCT05285085]2,133,900 participants (Actual)Observational2021-11-19Completed
A Phase III Efficacy And Safety Study of Ezetimibe (SCH58235) 10 mg in Addition to Atorvastatin or Simvastatin in the Therapy of Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia [NCT03884452]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-05-03Completed
A Phase II Randomised, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial of Simvastatin in Patients With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. [NCT00647348]Phase 2140 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Lipid-lowering Regimes Improve Oxidative Stress, Tryptophan Degradation in Hypercholesterolemia Chronic Kidney Disease Patients [NCT03543774]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-15Recruiting
Living With Statins - The Impact of Cholesterol Lowering Drugs on Health, Lifestyle and Well-being [NCT02255682]Phase 435 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Simvastatin: Proof-of-Concept for Prevention of Neurodegeneration in Mild TBI [NCT01952288]Phase 45 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-16Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Followed by an Open Label Treatment Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Children and Adolescents With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia [NCT03510884]Phase 3153 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-31Completed
A Four-part, Single-center, Open-label, Phase I Clinical Study to Evaluate the Drug-Drug Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between DBPR108 at Steady-state and Metformin Hydrochloride/Glibenclamide/Valsartan/ Simvastatin in Healthy Subjects [NCT04859452]Phase 156 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-26Completed
The Use of Injectable Plasma Rich Fibrin (I-PRF) Versus Simvastatin Gel in Surgical Management of Infra-bony Defects (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial) [NCT04824898]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-20Active, not recruiting
Statin Therapy to Reduce Progression in Women With Platinum Sensitive Ovarian Cancer [NCT04457089]Early Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-25Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Lipid Lowering Efficacy and Safety of Vytorin® 10/20 vs. Atorvastatin 10mg in Hypercholesterolemia Patients With Metabolic Syndrome in Korea [NCT00496730]Phase 3256 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo and Ezetimibe Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of AMG 145 on LDL-C in Combination With Statin Therapy in Subjects With Primary Hypercholesterolemia and Mixed Dyslipidemia [NCT01763866]Phase 32,067 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-15Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Establish the Clinical Benefit and Safety of Vytorin (Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Tablet) vs Simvastatin Monotherapy in High-Risk Subjects Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome (IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: [NCT00202878]Phase 318,144 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-17Completed
Efficacy of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg and MK0524A (1-2 g/Day) in Patients With Mixed Hyperlipidemia and Two or More Risk Factors to Cardiovascular Disease. [NCT00738985]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to The study was cancelled due to budget limitations)
A Randomized, Multicenter,Double Blind,Controlled With Placebo Trial About Efficacy of Statin Association With Standard Treatment in Prevention of Recurrent Hemorrhage in Patient With Liver Cirrhosis and Variceal Bleeding [NCT01095185]Phase 3150 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
The Effect of Simvastatin on Bone Density in Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes: a Double-blind, Randomized Active-comparator (Ezetimibe) Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT05613400]Phase 4240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-13Enrolling by invitation
Placebo-controlled, Double-blinded Phase III Trial of XP (Capecitabine/CDDP) Simvastatin in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients [NCT01099085]Phase 3207 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, 6-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Tablet Versus Atorvastatin in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00092690]Phase 31,902 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multisite, Randomized, Parallel Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Fixed Combination Torcetrapib/Atorvastatin Administered Once Daily (QD) Compared to Simvastatin for 6 Weeks in Subjects With Hypercholesterolemia (A5091031) [NCT00267280]Phase 3640 participants Interventional2006-01-31Terminated
To Study the Safety and Efficacy of Simvastatin in Patients With Hepatopulmonary Syndrome in Cirrhosis- A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05187715]45 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-26Recruiting
Cardiovascular Fixed Combination Pill ASR: Pharmacodynamic Clinical Trial of a Fixed Dose Combination of Acetylsalicylic Acid, Simvastatin, and Ramipril (Cardiovascular Polypill); LDL Cholesterol [NCT01362218]Phase 2107 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Per sponsor's decision)
Simvastatin to Improve Bone Health in SCI: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT02946424]Phase 276 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-07-01Active, not recruiting
Study of the Effect of EECP on Subclinical Atherosclerosis [NCT01106495]150 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of Simvastatin to Panitumumab in K-ras Mutant Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients. A Single-Arm, Multicenter, Phase II Study Using a Simon Two Stage Design. [NCT01110785]Phase 246 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-04-30Recruiting
Phase 4 Study of the Effect of Statin Treatment on Insulin Sensitivity During Myocardial Infarction [NCT01205347]Phase 427 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Improving Equitable Acces and Adherence to Secondary Prevention Therapy With a Fixed-Dose Combination Drug [NCT01321255]Phase 32,118 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
The Effect of Ezetimibe 10 mg, Simvastatin 20 mg and the Combination of Simvastatin 20 mg Plus 10 mg Ezetimibe on Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL)-Subfractions in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01384058]Phase 441 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A MC, DB, Rand, Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Eze/Simva 10/40 mg, Atorva 40 mg, Rosuva 10 mg in Achieving LDL-C <2 mmol/l in Pts With CVD...on Simva 40 mg With LDL-C ³2 mmol/l [NCT00462748]Phase 3786 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Phase II Simvastatin + Cetuximab/Irinotecan in K-ras Mutant Colorectal Cancer Patients Who Have Failed Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin-based Chemotherapy [NCT01281761]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Hemodynamic Effect of the Combination of Simvastatin With Non-cardioselective Beta Blockers in Patients With Cirrhosis and Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension [NCT01282385]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-04-30Not yet recruiting
Therapeutic Effects of Compound Zhenzhu Tiaozhi Capsules in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver disease-a Randomized Controlled Study [NCT03375580]196 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-12-31Recruiting
Use of High Potency Statins and Rates of Admission for Acute Kidney Injury: Multicenter, Retrospective Observational Analysis of Administrative Databases [NCT02518516]2,067,639 participants (Actual)Observational2011-01-31Completed
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Simvastatin on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dabigatran in Healthy Male Adults [NCT03728101]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-16Completed
An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Children and Adolescents With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia [NCT03510715]Phase 318 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-31Completed
A Multicenter Study to Assess the Cholesterol Lowering Level of Switching to an Investigational Drug Compared to Doubling the Dose of an Investigational Drug in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia and Atherosclerotic or Coronary Vascular Disease [NCT00090168]Phase 3435 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-27Completed
Protocol for Correlating Enteropathic Severity and Small Intestinal CYP3A4 Activity in Patients With Celiac Disease [NCT01338324]Phase 2/Phase 341 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Intravascular Ultrasound Evaluation of the Intervention Effect of Simvastatin Combined With Ezetimibe on Coronary Borderline Lesion in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris and Diabetes Mellitus Compared With Simvastatin Alone [NCT03771053]240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-01Recruiting
Phase IV-II Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effects of Continuous Simvastatin Administration on Hepatic and Systemic Hemodynamics in Patients With Cirrhosis. [NCT00594191]Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
A Phase III Multicenter, Double-Blind, Crossover Design Study to Evaluate Lipid-Altering Efficacy and Safety of Extended-Release Niacin/Laropiprant/Simvastatin Combination Tablet in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia [NCT01294683]Phase 3977 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-04Terminated
Simvastatin in the Prevention of Recurrent Pancreatitis, a Triple Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04021498]Phase 3144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-09-29Recruiting
Two-Part,Multicenter,Randomized,Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled,Study to Evaluate the Effect of Simvastatin,Losartan,and Pioglitazone on Cardiovascular Disease Biomarkers in Lower Extremity Atherosclerotic Plaque Excised From Patients w/PAD [NCT00720577]Early Phase 1164 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
An Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy of Switching to a Combination Tablet Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10mg/40mg, Compared to Doubling the Dose of Statin in Patients Hospitalized With a Coronary Event [NCT00132717]Phase 3450 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-01Completed
A 6 Week Open Label, Dose Comparison Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Rosuvastatin Versus Atorvastatin, Pravastatin, and Simvastatin in Subjects With Hypercholesterolemia. [NCT00654537]Phase 35,625 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
An Open-Label, Definitive Bioequivalence Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of the Simvastatin, Nicotinic Acid, and MK0524 (Laropiprant) Components of a Formulation of MK0524B With That of Zocor™ and MK0524A Tablets [NCT00943124]Phase 1220 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-Labeled, Parallel Group Comparison Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety of Ezetimibe Alone Versus Statin in the Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00753883]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Study to Evaluate the Effects of Gemcabene on the Steady-State Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Simvastatin in Healthy Volunteers [NCT02587390]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-05-31Completed
The Additive Anti-inflammatory Effect of Simvastatin in Combination With Inhaled Corticosteroids in Asthma [NCT00792337]Phase 353 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-labeled, Parallel Group Comparison Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Ezetimibe Added to Ongoing Statin Therapy Versus Doubling the Dose of Ongoing Statin in the Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia. [NCT00652327]Phase 483 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
"Statin Effects on Beta-Amyloid and Cerebral Perfusion in Adults at Risk for AD: Statins in Healthy, At-Risk Adults: Impact on Amyloid and Regional Perfusion (SHARP) Study" [NCT00939822]Phase 288 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Clinical and Digital Radiographic Evaluation of Simvastatin Versus MTA in Pulpotomy of Immature Permanent Vital Molars: A18 Month Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05878158]Early Phase 1128 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-01Recruiting
Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Study of Dapagliflozin and Valsartan or Simvastatin in Healthy Subjects [NCT00839683]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Effects of Simvastatin and Rosiglitazone Combination in Patients With the Metabolic Syndrome. [NCT00831129]Phase 2/Phase 353 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Single Randomized, Open,Cross-over, Phase Ig Study to Access the Drug-drug Interaction of SP2086 and Simvastatin [NCT02815722]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
[NCT00854503]Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
An 8-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Four-arm, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of ABT-143 to Simvastatin in Subjects With Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00812955]Phase 3474 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Living With Statins - The Impact of Cholesterol Lowering Drugs on Health, Lifestyle and Well-being [NCT02796378]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-06-30Active, not recruiting
The Acute Effect of Inflammatory Markers of Atherosclerotic Plaque in Humans [NCT00587717]35 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Completed
Pilot Randomized Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of Simvastatin for Smoking Cessation [NCT02399709]Phase 2124 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-01Completed
Higher Potency Statins and the Risk of New Diabetes: Multicentre, Observational Study of Administrative Databases [NCT02518503]136,966 participants (Actual)Observational2012-07-31Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of MK-0431D (a Fixed-dose Combination [FDC] of Sitagliptin and Simvastatin) for the Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) With Inadequate Glycemic [NCT01678820]Phase 3299 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-10Terminated(stopped due to Merck terminated the study for business reasons in November 2013.)
Impact of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Bariatric Surgery on System Pharmacology: Single-dose Cross-over Pharmacokinetic Study of Simvastatin and Carvedilol. [NCT04049786]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-01Enrolling by invitation
A Phase III Multicenter, Double-Blind, Crossover Design Study to Evaluate Lipid-Altering Efficacy and Safety of 1 g/10 mg Extended-Release Niacin/Laropiprant/Simvastatin Combination Tablets in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia or Mixed Dyslipidem [NCT01335997]Phase 31,139 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-01Terminated(stopped due to Business Reasons)
An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Prospective Study to Evaluate the Lipid-Lowering Efficacy and Safety of Simvastatin 40 Mg Tablet in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00398294]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-01Completed
"The Clinical Outcome and the Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Simvastatin Plus Standard Therapy Versus Standard Therapy Alone in Critically Ill Septic Patient" [NCT02067949]Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
Pilot Study on the Efficacy of Statins for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [NCT02070133]Phase 318 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Mechanisms and Interventions Addressing Accelerated Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Women With Endometriosis [NCT05059626]Phase 428 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-01Recruiting
An Open-label,Sequential,Single-site Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin When Coadministered With Polyethylene Glycol Loxenatide (PEX168) in Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT02447601]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-30Completed
The Effect of Simvastatin on the Clinical Outcome of Patients With Brain Metastases Treated With Radiation Therapy: a Pilot Study [NCT02104193]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Restoration of Immediate Peri-implant Defect by Simvastatin: a Controlled Clinical and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study [NCT04803500]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-02Completed
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin and Rosuvastatin for Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Function in Diabetic Polyneuropathy: a Randomized, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT02129231]Phase 274 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Effects of Ezetimibe, Simvastatin, and Vytorin on Reducing L5 in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome [NCT00988364]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
The Effect of Multiple Oral Doses of BI 1356 BS as Tablets Once Daily for Six Days on the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Multiple Oral Doses of 40 mg Simvastatin Given Once Daily for 20 Days and on the Pharmacokinetics of Its Metabolite Simv [NCT02183623]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Effects of Nicotinic Acid Plus Simvastatin Versus Simvastatin Alone on Carotid and Femoral Intima-Media Thickness in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (NASCIT)-A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00712049]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-06-30Recruiting
Simvastatin in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (STASH) a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT00731627]Phase 3803 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Early Detection of Atherosclerosis in the Primary Care Setting: a Randomized Trial to Assess the Efficacy of a Novel Strategy in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases. [NCT00734123]Phase 42,948 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-04-30Recruiting
Effects of High Dose Simvastatin vs. Atorvastatin on Baseline Lipoprotein Profiles, Apo-A-1 and C Reactive Protein [NCT00736463]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-01-31Recruiting
Impact of Statins on Cytokine Expression in Pneumonia [NCT00946166]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Investigator left institution.)
AIM HIGH: Niacin Plus Statin to Prevent Vascular Events [NCT00120289]Phase 33,414 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Terminated(stopped due to AIM-HIGH was stopped on the recommendation of the DSMB because of lack of efficacy of niacin in preventing primary outcome events.)
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of 6-month Acetylcarnitine Therapy on Arterial Blood Pressure, Lipid and Metabolic Profile, and Kidney Function in Hypertensive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Backg [NCT00984750]Phase 3229 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effects of Ezetimibe + Simvastatin on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Aortic Stenosis [NCT00092677]Phase 31,873 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-01-31Completed
Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Eye Study [NCT00542178]Phase 33,472 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
[NCT01085149]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-05-31Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of WelChol® as an Add-on to Simvastatin Therapy [NCT00753779]Phase 472 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Muscle Characteristics Associated With Statin Therapy [NCT00990834]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Unable to recruit subjects.)
Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial Adaptive Platform Trial for Community- Acquired Pneumonia [NCT02735707]Phase 310,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-11Recruiting
A Study to Investigate the Interaction of GSK1292263 With Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin in Healthy Subjects [NCT01101568]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-14Completed
Additive Effect of Ezetimibe Upon Simvastatin Treatment on Systemic Inflammatory Activity and Endothelial Function During Myocardial Infarction [NCT00905905]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Phase 4 Study of the Effect of Simvastatin Treatment on Inflammatory Response and Endothelial Function After Myocardial Infarction [NCT00906451]Phase 458 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Platform Adaptive Embedded Trial for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [NCT05658692]Phase 41,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-01Recruiting
A Phase II Single Arm Trial of Adding Simvastatin to Dual Anti-HER2 Therapy in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT03324425]Phase 234 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-04Recruiting
The Effect of Simvastatin in the Penile Erection: a Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial [NCT00947323]Phase 341 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Comparison of Combination of Methotrexate and Statins With Methotrexate Alone as an Anti-inflammatory Agent in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. [NCT04177173]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-01Completed
Post - Marketing Surveillance of the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Vytorin (Ezetimibe + Simvastatin) Tablet Among Filipino Patients [NCT00909389]4,748 participants (Actual)Observational2006-11-30Completed
[NCT00668343]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Ultrasonographic Modification of Liver Steatosis and Visceral Fat Induced by Treatment With Losartan and Simvastatin in Hypertensive Normocholesterolemic Obese Patients [NCT00669435]Phase 475 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-04-30Recruiting
A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Active-controlled Parallel Groups Study Comparing The Efficacy and Safety of The Daily Co-Administration of Ezetimibe 10 mg With Simvastatin 20 mg Vs Simvastatin Or Ezetimibe Alone in Subjects With Primary Hypercho [NCT00650819]Phase 3240 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-01Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, 6-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Tablet Versus Atorvastatin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00110435]Phase 31,229 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin and Fenofibrate Coadministration in Patients With Mixed Hyperlipidemia [NCT00093899]Phase 3611 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
A Phase 1 Open-Label Study in Healthy Adult Subjects to Assess the Effect of Cenicriviroc Mesylate (CVC) on the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors (Rosuvastatin, Atorvastatin and Simvastatin), Caffeine and Digoxin [NCT02685462]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Prospective, Randomized, Double - Blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Simvastatin and Resveratrol Therapy on Clinical, Endocrinological, Biochemical and Endothelial Dysfunction Parameters in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. [NCT02766803]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-31Recruiting
The Metabolic and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Combined Ezetimibe and Simvastin Therapy, as Compared to Simvastatin Alone, in Patients With Chronic Proteinuric Nephropathy [NCT00861731]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-11-30Active, not recruiting
A 12-week Open-label, Randomised, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase IIIb Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin (CRESTOR™) in Combination With Ezetimibe and Simvastatin in Patients With Hypercholesterolaemia and CHD [NCT00525824]Phase 31,743 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Phase 4 Study of Effects of ARB Compared With Diuretics in Hypertension Patients With High Cardiovascular Risks [NCT01011660]Phase 413,542 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-10-31Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Morning Versus Evening Intake of Simvast CR Tablet in Patients With Hyperlipidemia: A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Phase 3 Trial [NCT00973115]Phase 3132 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Targeting Microvascular Dysfunction in Young Hypertensive Patients [NCT01047423]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Withdrawn
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, 12 Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MK0524B Versus Atorvastatin in Patients With Mixed Hyperlipidemia [NCT00289900]Phase 32,340 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-24Completed
A Single Arm, Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy With Capecitabine Plus Simvastatin in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients [NCT02161822]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-01Active, not recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Simvastatin-ezetimibe Combination Therapy in Reduction of Progression of Atherosclerosis Among Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Randomized Single-Blind Trial [NCT02548936]Early Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Enrolling by invitation
Phase I/II Study of Simvastatin (Zocor) Therapy in Sickle Cell Disease [NCT00508027]Phase 1/Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Effects of Ezetimibe in Association With Statins on Postprandial Lipemia in Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT00699023]Phase 413 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
[NCT02675309]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
A 12-Week, Randomized, Open-Label, 3 Arm Parallel Group, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin With Atorvastatin and Simvastatin Achieving NCEP ATP III LDL-C Goals in High Risk Subjects With Hypercholesterolaemia [NCT00654173]Phase 34,444 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, Multi-Center, Phase IIIB, Parallel Group Switching Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lipid Lowering Agents Atorvastatin and Simvastatin With Rosuvastatin in High Risk Subjects With Type IIa and IIb Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00654407]Phase 34,875 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
Simvastatin add-on to Escitalopram in Patients With Comorbid Obesity and Major Depression: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT04301271]Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-13Recruiting
INdians Followed for INtensive Lipid Lowering Treatment and Its safetY: To Assess The Safety And Effectiveness Of Ezetimibe Co-Administered With Any Statin Compared To Doubling Of Current Statin Daily Dose In South Asian Canadians [NCT00664469]Phase 364 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor enrollment)
An Open-Label Extension of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study to Evaluate Simvastatin 20 mg Plus Omacor 4g Compared to Simvastatin 20 mg Plus Placebo in Subjects With Mixed Dyslipidemia [NCT00678743]Phase 413 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of High Dose Statin and Niacin Therapy on Excised Plaque Biomarkers in Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) [NCT00804843]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
The Effect of Simvastatin Therapy on the Expression of Procoagulant and Inflammatory Markers in Heart Failure [NCT00769210]Early Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Comparative Efficacy of a Vytorin 10/80 Tablet Split Into 4 (Estimated Dose Ezetimibe 2.5 + Simvastatin 20) Versus Simvastatin 20 Milligrams on LDL Cholesterol [NCT00762164]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Quality of Life and Metabolic Alterations in Patients With Statin-Associated Myopathy [NCT00850460]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Investigator left institution and no PI has been found to continue the study)
[NCT01021579]Phase 484 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Effects of Simvastatin Versus Simvastatin Combined With Ezetimibe on Blood Coagulation in Patients With Acute Coronary Events: Relationship With Cholesterol-Lowering and Anti-Inflammatory Properties [NCT00725829]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-06-30Recruiting
Simvastatin For Intracerebral Hemorrhage Study [NCT00718328]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor recruitment, trial terminated)
Open-label Randomized Study of Efficacy and Safety of Simvastatin in Uveitis [NCT04183387]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Comparative Study of Effects and Safety of Intermittent Low Dose Therapy of Fenofibrate and Simvastatin on Chronic Hemodialysis Patients [NCT02886299]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial of Simvastatin in Amnestic MCI Patients [NCT00842920]Phase 4520 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-12-31Active, not recruiting
Effects of Three Statins, Simvastatin, Atorvastatin, and Pitavastatin, on the Pharmacokinetics for Midazolam in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00716846]11 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Open-label, Long-term Study of Coadministration of Ezetimibe and Simvastatin in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia Who Have Not Reached LDL-cholesterol Target With HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors [NCT00653523]Phase 3151 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-01Completed
The Effects of Simvastatin in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [NCT00680641]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-04-30Active, not recruiting
Curcumin-Simvastatin Release Profile in the Gingival Crevicular Fluid Following EDTA Root Surface Etching in the Surgical Treatment of Intrabony Periodontal Defects - A Biochemical and Clinical Study [NCT04044417]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-25Completed
A Drug Interaction Study to Investigate the Effects of SLV337 on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT00924430]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
A Phase III, Multicentre, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomised, Flexible-dose, Comparative Study of MCI-196 Versus Simvastatin for the Treatment of Dyslipidaemia in Subjects With Chronic Kidney Disease on Dialysis (Incorporating a Placebo-controlled Wit [NCT00858637]Phase 3260 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Simvastatin Treatment on Measurements of Lipidomic Biomarkers in Men With Dyslipidemia [NCT00935259]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Vytorin on Carotid Intima-media Thickness and Overall Rigidity [NCT00738296]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Fixed-Sequence Study To Estimate The Effect Of Repeated Dosing Of PF-05175157 On The Pharmacokinetics Of A Single Dose Of Simvastatin In Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT01469468]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Efficacy and Adverse Effect of Simvastatin Compare to Rosuvastatin in SLE Patients With Corticosteroid Therapy and High LDL Cholesterol Level [NCT00866229]Phase 4140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-04-30Recruiting
European Society of Hypertension and Chinese Hypertension League Stroke in Hypertension Optimal Treatment Trial [NCT01563731]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
A Study Assessing the Effect of Cardiovascular Medications Provided as Low-cost, Evidence-based Generic Samples [NCT00761904]660 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-12-31Not yet recruiting
To Study the Effect of Vytorin on Intracellular Lipid and Inflammation in Obese Subjects [NCT01420328]Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-05-31Active, not recruiting
A Year 2, Long-Term, Open-Label, Safety Extension Study of the Combination of ABT-335 and Statin Therapy for Subjects With Mixed Dyslipidemia [NCT00491530]Phase 3310 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
A Pilot Trial of Simvastatin Alone and Added to Tenofovir or Entecavir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B [NCT00994773]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A Phase II, Fixed-sequenced, Open- Label, Research Study to Assess Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions of AEGR-733 on Lipid-lowering Therapies in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00359281]Phase 2125 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Plaque Inflammation and Dysfunctional HDL in AIM-HIGH [NCT00880178]324 participants (Actual)Observational2008-05-31Completed
Influence of Simvastatin on apoB-100 Secretion in Non-Obese Subjects With Moderate Hypercholesterolemia: A Stable Isotope Study [NCT00905541]8 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-11-30Completed
SCH 465981: Assessment of Bi-Directional Interaction Between Components of Vytorin® (Ezetimibe and Simvastatin) and Niaspan® (Niacin Extended-Release Tablets) in Healthy Subjects [NCT00652431]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Active-Comparative, 12-Week Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Drug in Conjunction With Another Drug in Korean Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00157911]Phase 3136 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
A 4-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of JTT-705 600 mg Versus Placebo Administered Once Daily in Combination With Simvastatin 40 mg in Patients With Low HDL Levels [NCT00688558]Phase 292 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
Effects on Atherosclerosis Regression of Ezetimibe Monotherapy or Ezetimibe Plus Simvastatin Combination Therapy: Evaluation by Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography [NCT00926055]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Withdrawn
Study of Role of Anti-Inflammatory Agents in Patients With Schizophrenia [NCT00929955]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
A Single Center, Open Label, Phase 1 Drug-Drug Interaction Study to Investigate the Effects of Voclosporin on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin in Healthy Volunteers [NCT05306379]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-24Completed
Effects of High Dose Simvastatin Therapy on Glucose Metabolism and Ectopic Lipid Deposition in Non-Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT00704314]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
Antihypertensive Effect of Simvastatin in Hypertensive Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial With Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring [NCT00704548]Phase 492 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-06-30Recruiting
"Perioperative HMG-CoA-Reductase-Inhibitors: A Pilot Study Assessing the Role of Statin Therapy and Perioperative Inflammatory Response in Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery" [NCT00656292]Phase 461 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Effect of Simvastatin Withdrawal on Ocular Endothelial Function [NCT02533141]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to no funding)
A Single Dose, Randomized, Open-label, Replicated Crossover Bioequivalence Study of Generic Simvastatin 40 mg Film-coated Tablets and Reference Product (ZOCOR®) in Healthy Thai Volunteers Under Fasting Conditions [NCT06178640]Phase 146 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-02-29Not yet recruiting
Women With Chest Pain and Normal Coronary Arteries Study: A Randomized Study of Medical Treatment and Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes [NCT00743197]3 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to departure of PI from institution.)
Statin Therapy to Reduce Disease Progression From Liver Cirrhosis to Cancer [NCT02968810]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-06-21Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effectiveness of the Different Treatment Modalities for Management of Vaso-occlusive Painful Crisis in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease [NCT04301336]Phase 2/Phase 3350 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-01Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Multiple-dose, Crossover Study to Investigate the Pharmacodynamic Drug Interaction Between Cilostazol and Statins in Healthy Male Volunteer [NCT01870466]Phase 163 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
High-dose HMG-CoA Inhibitor Simvastatin for Patients With Relapsed CLL: Pilot Trial and Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic Studies [NCT00828282]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Randomized Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Phase II Trial of Simvastatin and Gemcitabine in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients [NCT00944463]Phase 2106 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
An Open-label Exploratory Study of the Pharmacokinetic Interaction of CXA-10 Administered to Steady State With Pravastatin and Vytorin® (Simvastatin and Ezetimibe) in Healthy Males [NCT02547402]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
[NCT00000553]Phase 30 participants Interventional1994-09-30Completed
The Effect of Efavirenz and Nelfinavir on the Pharmacokinetics of Hydroxymethylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Inhibitors [NCT00017758]Phase 156 participants InterventionalCompleted
A 10-12 Week Multicenter, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Valsartan (320 mg) and Simvastatin (80 mg) Compared to Valsartan (320 mg) and Simvastatin (80 mg) Monotherapies in Essential Hypertension and Hyperchole [NCT00171093]Phase 3369 participants Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Phase II Study of Simvastatin in Primary Breast Cancer; Test of Its Potential Selectivity on Basal Subtype Breast Cancer [NCT00807950]Phase 2100 participants Interventional2008-03-31Active, not recruiting
[NCT00546559]0 participants Observational2004-01-31Completed
Effect of Statins on Pathobiology of Alzheimer's Disease [NCT00486044]Phase 2103 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
A Randomized Trial of the Long-term Clinical Effects of Raising HDL Cholesterol With Extended Release Niacin/Laropiprant [NCT00461630]Phase 325,673 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Study of Pitavastatin Vs. Simvastatin (Following Up-Titration) in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia or Combined Dyslipidemia [NCT00309777]Phase 3857 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Parallel Groups Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Vytorin Versus Placebo in Subjects With Primary Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00413972]Phase 3392 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Groups, Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Co-administration of Ezetimibe 10 mg With Ongoing Treatment With Simvastatin 20 mg Versus Doubling the Dose of Simvastati [NCT00423488]Phase 393 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-12Completed
Platelet Function in Diabetic Patients With and Without Renal Impairment, and the Effects of Lipid Lowering Treatment [NCT01035320]Phase 439 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Survival Benefits of Statins in Breast Cancer Patients With Abnormal Lipid Metabolism [NCT03971019]Phase 3314 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-28Recruiting
SEARCH: Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine [NCT00124072]Phase 312,064 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Simvastatin in Women at High Risk for a New Breast Cancer [NCT00334542]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Multicentric, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Simvastatin in the Acute Phase of Ischemic Stroke [NCT01073007]Phase 4104 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Effect of the Association of a Statin to Antibiotics on the Prognosis of Patients Presenting With a Suspicion of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia [NCT01057758]Phase 3300 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Terminated(stopped due to stopped for futility)
Effect of the Addition of Simvastatin to Enalapril in Hypertensive Individuals With Average Cholesterol Levels and Diastolic Dysfunction [NCT01061450]Phase 455 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Investigation of Simvastatin Therapy in Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome [NCT00064792]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
Transesophageal MRI in Conjunction With Lipid Lowering Measures [NCT00125060]72 participants Interventional2000-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the LDL-C Lowering of Switching to a Combo Tab Ezetimibe/Simvastatin (10 mg/20 mg) Compared to Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Patients With Primary High Cholesterol and High Cardiovascular [NCT00479713]Phase 3618 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-01Completed
The Effects of Simvastatin on Th17 Cytokines and Th17 Polarizing Cytokines in COPD Patients [NCT01944176]Phase 324 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
[NCT00242268]Phase 330 participants Interventional2005-10-31Recruiting
A Two-part Healthy Volunteer Study to Investigate Both the Interaction of GSK2586184 With Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin and to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of Two Different Formulations of GSK2586184 [NCT01953835]Phase 137 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-04Completed
Simvastatin Addition for Patients With Recent-onset Schizophrenia [NCT01999309]Phase 3121 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Randomized Trial of the Association Between Low-Dose Statins and Nutraceuticals in High-intEnsity Statin-intoleRant patiENts With Very High Risk Coronary Artery diseasE [NCT02001883]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-11-30Recruiting
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Valsartan/Simvastatin Combinations 160/20mg up Titrated to 320/20mg Versus 160/40mg up Titrated to 320/40mg in Patients With Both Essential Hypertension and Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00254475]Phase 3871 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
The Effect of Statins on Markers of Breast Cancer Proliferation and Apoptosis in Women With Early Stage Breast Cancer [NCT03454529]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-09Completed
Effectiveness and Tolerability of Early Initiation of Combined Lipid -Lowering Therapy Included Simvastatin and Fenofibrate vs Simvastatin Alone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertriglyceridemia and Acute Coronary Syndrome [NCT02015988]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Multi-center, Open-label, 2-treatment, Single-sequence Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effects of a Single 200 mg Subcutaneous Injection of Sarilumab on the Pharmacokinetics of a Single 40 mg Oral Dose of Simvastatin, With Optional 1-year Extension of Op [NCT02017639]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Add-on Simvastatin in Schizophrenia Trial [NCT00605995]15 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment was slower than anticipated by the investigators and the funding research foundation.)
A Single Arm, Phase II Study of Simvastatin Plus XELOX and Bevacizumab as First-line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients [NCT02026583]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Effects of Simvastatin on Biochemical Parameters and Outcome of IVF-ICSI in Pcos Patients : A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT00575601]Phase 3120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of Simvastatin 20 mg/Day Versus Vytorin 10/20 in Subjects With Lipid Profiles Not Meeting Current NCEP Guidelines, Following a Low-Carbohydrate Diet [NCT00566267]Phase 2/Phase 358 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Regenerative Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis Using Nanobone With or Without Simvastatin: A 6-month Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT04559841]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-06Completed
"A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Design Study to Evaluate the Lipid-Altering Efficacy and Safety of MK-0524B Combination Tablet Compared to MK-0524A + Simvastatin Coadministration in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia and Mixed [NCT00479882]Phase 32,414 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-15Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, 12 Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Extended-release (ER) Niacin/Laropiprant in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia. [NCT00479388]Phase 31,216 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Phase I, Randomized, Open Label, Mono-centered, Prospective Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Different Formulations and Doses of Simvastatin in Healthy Subjects and in Subjects With Celiac Disease in Remission [NCT01642862]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Low recruitment rate)
Efficacy of Simvastatin in Reducing Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Advanced Fibrosis Due to Alcohol: Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial [NCT04971577]Phase 2/Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-22Recruiting
The Role of Androgen Deprivation Therapy In Cardiovascular Disease - A Longitudinal Prostate Cancer Study (RADICAL PC1) & A RAndomizeD Intervention for Cardiovascular and Lifestyle Risk Factors in Prostate Cancer Patients (RADICAL PC2) [NCT03127631]6,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-21Recruiting
A Phase I, 2-Panel, Open-Label Study in Healthy Subjects to Investigate the Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between TMC435 and the HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors Atorvastatin and Simvastatin [NCT01689623]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Naturopathic Treatment for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00718796]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
The Effect of Simvastatin on Desensitization of Panel-Positive Kidney Transplant Candidates [NCT00693576]Phase 2/Phase 382 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Prospective, Double-Blinded, Multi-Centred, Randomised Controlled Trial of Perioperative Simvastatin Use in Elective Colorectal Surgery [NCT00994903]Phase 3132 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
A 6-wk Open-Label, Randomised, Multicentre, Phase IIIb, Parallel-Group Study, Which Describes the Renal Effects of the Lipid-Regulating Agents Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin in the Treatment of Sub's With Fredrickson Type IIa & Type IIb Dyslipidaemia, Inc. [NCT00654446]Phase 3442 participants Interventional2002-09-30Completed
A Phase I, Single Centre, Open-Label Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics of Both AZD9056 (Steady State) and Simvastatin (Single Dose) When Co-Administered in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00736606]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Effect of Diabetes Mellitus on Cholesterol Absorption, Synthesis and Statin Efficacy [NCT00879710]57 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Combined Treatment of Cardiovascular Risk Factors In Newly Admitted Patients With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder Who Are Receiving Olanzapine And Matched Controls [NCT00672464]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to lack of funding)
Effects of Ezetimibe and Simvastatin on LDL Receptor Protein Expression and on LDL Receptor and HMG-CoA Reductase mRNA Expression in Mononuclear Cells: a Randomized Controlled Study in Healthy Men [NCT00317993]Phase 460 participants Interventional2004-04-30Completed
A Randomized Window of Opportunity Study of Preoperative Letrozole and Simvastatin Versus Letrozole Alone in Stage I-III Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer [NCT05464810]Early Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-02Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Lipid-Altering Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe (+) Simvastatin Versus Atorvastatin in Hypercholesterolemic Patients With Diabetes Mellitus or Metabolic Syndrome [NCT00157924]Phase 4190 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Lepidium Sativum Extract Versus Simvastatin as an Adjunctive Local Delivery Agents to Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial With Biochemical Analysis [NCT05657015]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-01Completed
Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial of Simvastatin Use As Adjuvant Therapy in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT04178980]Phase 160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-01Not yet recruiting
Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury of Human Endothelium: Role of Glucose and Statins [NCT00995670]59 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
OM6X: An Open-Label Extension of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Lovaza (Previously Omacor®) and Simvastatin Therapy in Hypertriglyceridemic Subjects [NCT00903409]Phase 3188 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-15Completed
Effects of Simvastatin on CSF AD Biomarkers in Cognitively Normal Subjects [NCT01142336]Phase 449 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Standard Medical Management in Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke in China. [NCT00664846]4,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Study of Simvastatin on Myocardial Protection and Cardiac Function Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass [NCT01653223]369 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-01-31Recruiting
Statins and Noncardiovascular Endpoints [NCT00330980]Phase 41,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2000-04-30Completed
The Effect of Seven-day Simvastatin Administration on Emotional Processing, Reward Processing, and Inflammation in Healthy Volunteers [NCT04652089]Phase 1/Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-03Completed
Effects on NF-κB Activity: High Dose Simvastatin Versus Combination Therapy With Ezetimibe [NCT01424891]31 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Multifactorial Intervention to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis [NCT02246257]300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-09-30Recruiting
The Drug Interaction Study of SP2086 and Simvastatin in Healthy Subjects [NCT02817243]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-03-31Recruiting
Rho-kinase in Patients With Atherosclerosis: Effects of Statins A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Ezetimibe/Simvastatin and Simvastatin [NCT00560170]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
[NCT01857843]Phase 4160 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Single Dose, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Subcutaneous LGT209 in Hypercholesterolemic Patients on Stable Doses of Atorva [NCT01859455]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
Treatment With HMG-COA Reductase Inhibitor (Simvastatin) of Growth and Bone Abnormalities in Children With Noonan Syndrome: A Phase III Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Therapeutic Trial [NCT02713945]Phase 353 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-25Completed
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Reduction With Statins in Hypertensives Patients. [NCT00738972]Phase 312 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated early due to sample size, not possible to perform further statistical analysis.)
7 Tesla MRI Study in Patients With Statin Related Muscle Complaints [NCT04575090]8 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-05Completed
Randomized Study of Antihypertensives and Antilipemics in American Indians With Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus at High Risk of Developing Nephropathy and Cardiovascular Disease [NCT00004266]Phase 3160 participants (Actual)Interventional1993-08-31Completed
A Phase I, Open-Label, Non-Randomised, Multicentre Study to Assess the Effect of AZD9291 on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin (a Sensitive CYP3A4 Substrate) in Patients With EGFRm Positive NSCLC Whose Disease Has Progressed on an EGFR TKI [NCT02197234]Phase 152 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-22Active, not recruiting
Randomized Phase II Trail Comparing Gefitinib Plus Simvastatin and Gefitinib Alone in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) [NCT00452244]Phase 2110 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Irinotecan/Cisplatin Plus Simvastatin in Chemo-naive Patients With Extensive Disease-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00452634]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Phase 4 Study on Effect of Ezetimibe on Platelet Aggregation and LDL Tendency to Peroxidation In Hypercholesterolemic Patients on Simvastatin [NCT00466401]Phase 420 participants Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Simvastatin Reduces Plasma Osteoprotegerin in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Microalbuminuria [NCT00471549]Phase 418 participants (Actual)Interventional1991-06-30Completed
A Single-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, 15 Day Repeated-dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of SB-649868 and Its Interaction With the CYP3A4 Isoenzyme in Healthy Male Subjects. [NCT00495729]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-18Completed
A Multi-centre, Double Blind, Randomised, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study Investigating Simvastatin as an Add-on Treatment IM Administered Interferon-beta-1a for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [NCT00492765]Phase 4380 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Phase IV, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-arm, Comparative and Forced- Titration Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin Versus Simvastatin in Patients With Type 2 DM and Dyslipidemia [NCT00506961]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
[NCT00522158]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
Effect of Local Application of Platelet-Rich Fibrin Scaffold Loaded With Simvastatin Versus Bone Powder on Peri-Implant Bone Changes [NCT06016218]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-05Completed
The Need of Dosing Adjustment for Simvastatin in Obese Patients Post Bariatric Surgery- Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) [NCT03571802]Phase 410 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-13Recruiting
the Clinical Research Using Simvastatin as a Medication to Treat Advanced Secondary Pulmonary Hypertension [NCT00538044]Phase 10 participants Interventional2009-01-31Not yet recruiting
Statin Recapture Therapy Before Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting [NCT01715714]Phase 42,630 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-07Completed
A Phase IV, Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Atorvastatin Versus Simvastatin In Type 2 Diabetic Subjects With Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00141141]Phase 4383 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Phase IB Trial of Metformin, Digoxin, Simvastatin in Subjects With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Other Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT03889795]Phase 115 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-05Recruiting
Clinical Study of Albumin Paclitaxel With or Without Simvastatin in Treating Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Relapsed From First-line Chemotherapy [NCT04698941]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-25Recruiting
Central Nervous System Vascular Changes Evidenced by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Adult Patients With Sickle Cell Disease and the Effect of Treatment With Simvastatin [NCT03599609]Phase 1/Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-05Active, not recruiting
Effect of Local Application of Platelet-rich Fibrin Scaffold Loaded With Simvastatin on Peri-implant Bone Changes [NCT05008068]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-12Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Forced-Titration Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of 145 mg Fenofibrate and 20 or 40 mg Simvastatin With Atorvastatin Monotherapy in Patients With Mixed Dyslipidemia at Risk of Cardiovasc [NCT00362934]Phase 3516 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Simvastatin Vs Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes and Supplements: A Primary Prevention Randomized Trial [NCT00365742]80 participants Interventional2006-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Open-label Crossover Study to Investigate the Potential Interaction Between GK Activator (2) and Simvastatin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00377442]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Efficacy of High-Dose and Low-Dose Simvastatin on Vascular Oxidative Stress and Neurological Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Controlled Trial [NCT03402204]Phase 364 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-01Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, 2-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of Multiple Doses of Epanova® on the Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin in Healthy Normal Subjects [NCT01486433]Phase 152 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Simvastatin on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage-Induced Vasospasm [NCT00235963]Phase 1/Phase 2104 participants Interventional2002-12-31Completed
A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lapaquistat Acetate 100 mg in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Currently Treated With Lipid-Lowering Therapy [NCT00251680]Phase 3400 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Prevention of Radiocontrast Media Induced Nephropathy by Short-Term High-Dose Statin in Renal Insufficiency Undergoing Coronary Angiography (PROMISS) [NCT00259441]Phase 4320 participants Interventional2005-02-28Completed
The Effect of High Dose Simvastatine on Multiple Myeloma [NCT00281476]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Effects of Statins on Pro- and Antioxidant Status : Link With Statin-Associated Myopathy. A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study. [NCT00285181]24 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Do HMG CoA Reductase Inhibitors Affect Abeta Levels? [NCT00303277]Phase 435 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
Effect of Pioglitazone on Intima Media Thickness, Endothelial Function, and Heart Rate Variability in Patients With Impaired Glucose Tolerance [NCT00306826]Phase 4120 participants InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to financial support withdrawn)
Diabetes and Combined Lipid Therapy Regimen (DIACOR) Study: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Simvastatin, Fenofibrate, and Combined Fenofibrate and Simvastatin in Patients With Controlled Type II Diabetics Without Evidence of Coronary Disease [NCT00309712]300 participants Interventional2002-08-31Completed
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Role of Inflammation, Oxidative Stress Injury and Effect of Statins [NCT00321802]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Effect of Statin Therapy on C-reactive Protein Levels in Patients With COPD [NCT00655993]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Double Blind, Randomised, Placebo Controlled Study Investigating Simvastatin as an add-on Treatment to Copaxone for the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in Patients Treated With Copaxone for at Least 3 Months [NCT00429442]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Withdrawn
Phase 2 Study Examining the Effect of Simvastatin vs Placebo on Monocyte Function and Inflammation in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes [NCT00441844]Phase 250 participants Interventional2002-10-31Completed
A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of POLYCAP (Quintapill)Versus Its Components in Subjects With at Least One Additional Cardiovascular Risk Factor [NCT00443794]2,050 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Cholesterol and Pharmacogenetic Study [NCT00451828]Phase 41,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
Fast Assessment of Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack to Prevent Early Recurrence (FASTER) [NCT00109382]Phase 2/Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Active Comparator, Forced-Titration Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of 145 mg Fenofibrate and 20 or 40 mg Simvastatin With 40 mg Simvastatin Monotherapy in Patients With Mixed Dyslipidem [NCT00349375]Phase 31,040 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Oral L-Citrulline Compared to Placebo in Patients Taking Background Simvastatin 40 mg qD and With Peripheral Arterial Disease Including Intermittent Claudication [NCT00351286]Phase 2160 participants Interventional2006-03-31Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of 145 mg Fenofibrate and 40 mg Simvastatin With 40 mg Simvastatin Monotherapy in Patients With Mixed Dyslipidemia at Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Not Ad [NCT00352183]Phase 3450 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Genetic Determinanats of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe or Statin Monotherapy to Co-Administration of Both [NCT00461968]240 participants Interventional2005-02-28Completed
An Evaluation of Simvastatin 20 mg Plus Omacor 4 g Compared to Simvastatin 20 mg Plus Placebo in Subjects With Mixed Dyslipidemia [NCT00487591]40 participants (Actual)Observational2006-11-30Completed
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Dose Ascending, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Steady State Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of SB-656933-AAA Following Repeated Doses in Healthy Adult Subjects. The Pharmaco [NCT00504439]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-04Completed
Nephropathy in Type 2 Diabetes: Effects of an Intensive Multifactorial Intervention Trial on Cardio-renal Events. [NCT00535925]Phase 4850 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Effects on Lipid Profile of Combined Ezetimibe and Simvastatin Therapy as Compared to Simvastatin Alone in People With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00157482]Phase 2108 participants Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Clinical Trial of Zocor and Vytorin in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes [NCT00477204]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
A Pilot Study Evaluating the Effect of Pioglitazone, Simvastatin, and Ibuprofen on Neutrophil Migration in Vivo in Healthy Subjects [NCT00531882]25 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Phase 2 Efficacy and Safety Study of LY2484595 Alone and in Combination With Atorvastatin, Simvastatin, and Rosuvastatin in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia or Low HDL-C [NCT01105975]Phase 2398 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
A Prospective Randomized Open Label Blinded Endpoint Multicenter Study in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease to Assess the LDL Lowering Effect of Switching to Ezetimibe (+) Simvastatin for Cholesterol Lowering, Compared the Dose of the Statin Used. [NCT00166530]Phase 4367 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Effect of Statins on Cerebral Blood Flow After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage [NCT00795288]Phase 1/Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Effect of Repeated Administration of Eslicarbazepine Acetate on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin in Healthy Subjects [NCT00987558]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Detection and Prevention of Anthracycline-Related Cardiac Toxicity With Concurrent Simvastatin [NCT02096588]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-20Active, not recruiting
[NCT00450840]Phase 40 participants InterventionalRecruiting
Open -Label Phase IIa Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Statin on the Course of Progressive Smoldering Multiple Myeloma [NCT00503763]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to We found out that there is another study on the same issue)
Relative Bioavailability of BI 10773 and Simvastatin After Single and Combined Administration - an Open-label, Randomised, Crossover Trial in Healthy Subjects [NCT01304329]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Comparison of the Effect on Endothelial Function of Statin Therapy in High Dose Versus Low Dose Combined With Ezetimibe [NCT01241097]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-03-31Recruiting
Phase 2A Pilot Trial of Metformin, Digoxin, Simvastatin (C3) in Combination With Gemcitabine in Subjects With Recurrent / Refractory Metastatic Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT06030622]Phase 1/Phase 225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-01Recruiting
Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) [NCT00000620]Phase 310,251 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-09-30Completed
Evaluation of Potential Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Protease Inhibitors and Lipid Lowering Agents [NCT00000941]Phase 156 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Randomized Open Label Phase II Trial Comparing BIBW2992 Plus Simvastatin With BIBW2992 Plus Best Supportive Care in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced (Stage IIIB/IV) Non-adenocarcinomatous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) [NCT01156545]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Simvastatin to Slow the Progression of Alzheimer's Disease [NCT00053599]Phase 3400 participants Interventional2002-12-31Completed
An Open-Label Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of a Combination of Niacin ER and Simvastatin in Patients With Dyslipidemia (OCEANS) [NCT00080275]Phase 3600 participants Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Safety and Tolerability of the Combination of Simvastatin Plus Rifaximin in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis: a Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial. [NCT03150459]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-26Completed
A Randomised, Double Blind, Parallel-Group Study of the Oxidative Stress Lowering Effect of Simvastatin and Atorvastatin. [NCT00404599]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-02-28Recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of Irinotecan/Cisplatin With or Without Simvastatin in Chemo-naive Patients With Extensive Disease-small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT01441349]Phase 2192 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-08-31Active, not recruiting
Effects of Usage of Simvastatin in Mild to Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients. Could it Make a Difference? [NCT05551871]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-01Not yet recruiting
Overcoming Chemotherapy Resistance in Refractory Multiple Myeloma With Simvastatin, A Pilot Study [NCT02971410]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to PI no longer interested in pursuing study.)
Effect of Simvastatin and Metformin on Clinical, Endocrine, Metabolic and Endothelial Function of Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Prospective Randomised Trial [NCT00396513]0 participants Interventional2005-09-30Recruiting
Simvastatin Treatment to Improve Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis [NCT05771675]Early Phase 190 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-31Not yet recruiting
Renal Hemodynamic Effects of the HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors in Normal Volunteers and in Patients With Chronic Renal Failure [NCT02511418]0 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Inflammatory Markers, Depressive Symptoms, and Heart Disease [NCT00208117]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Unable to enroll subjects)
Comparison of Antiplatelet and Anti-inflammatory Effects of High Dose Statin Monotherapy Versus Moderate Dose Statin Plus Ezetimibe [NCT00474123]78 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Comparative Efficacy Evaluation of Lipid Levels When Treated With Niaspan and Statin or Other Lipid-Modifying Therapies [NCT00079638]Phase 4300 participants Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Safety & Efficacy of a Combination Niacin ER/Simvastatin in Patients With Dyslipidemia: A Dose-Ranging Study - SEACOAST [NCT00082251]Phase 30 participants InterventionalCompleted
Evaluation of the Effects of Simvastatin 40 Mg on Lipid Profiles and Specified Circulatory Parameters in Normotensive Hypercholesterolemia Patients(MK-0733-265) [NCT00397826]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Atorvastatin Compared With Simvastatin In The Prevention of CHD Morbidity And Mortality In Patients With CHD [NCT00159835]Phase 48,600 participants Interventional1999-02-28Completed
Determination of the Efficacy and Feasibility of Simvastatin as Inhibitor of Cell Adhesion Mediated Drug Resistance in Patients With Refractory Multiple Myeloma - a Phase II Clinical Trial. [NCT00399867]Phase 230 participants Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of WelChol® in Combination With Zetia® Compared to Zetia® Alone in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00185107]Phase 445 participants Interventional2005-03-31Completed
The Effects of Ezetimibe on Postprandial Hyperlipidemia and Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With the Metabolic Syndrome. [NCT00189085]Phase 420 participants Interventional2004-12-31Completed
A Clinical Trial of Aspirin and Simvastatin in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [NCT00384865]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Terminated
Effects of Statin and Ezetimibe Association on Kinetics of Artificial Chilomicrons in Men With Stable Coronary Heart Disease. [NCT00481351]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Effect of Locally-Applied Simvastatin on Clinical Attachment Level and Alveolar Bone in Periodontal Maintenance Patients [NCT03452891]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-01Completed
Phase II Study of Simvastatin in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia [NCT00575965]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual led to early study termination.)
Study of Statin Therapy in the Treatment of Sepsis [NCT00676897]Phase 2/Phase 318 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
An Open Label, Single-armed, Exploratory Study of Simvastatin Therapy on the Cardiac Function in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy. [NCT03775070]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-17Completed
A Multicenter, Open-label, 6 Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Algorithm Based Intensive Treatment With Vytorin Versus Standard Treatment of Other Statins in Moderate, Moderately High and High Risk Patients. [NCT01587235]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Withdrawn
A Multicenter, Open Study To Evaluate The Efficacy Of Ezetimibe 10 Mg Added On Statin Therapy, In Reducing LDL Cholesterol To Target Levels In Patients After Acute Coronary Syndrome [NCT00652717]Phase 4280 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-01Completed
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Four Second Line Pharmacological Strategies in Type 2 Diabetes Study [NCT05220917]781,430 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-08-01Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled,4-Period, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effects of Ezetimibe and Simvastatin, Coadministered and Alone, on Intestinal Absorption of Cholesterol [NCT00652301]Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
A Comparison of Treatment With Ezetimibe (SCH 58235) and Simvastatin Coadministration Versus Simvastatin in Attaining the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) or CHD Risk Equivalent Str [NCT00551447]Phase 3616 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
A Double-Blind, Multicenter Study to Assess the LDL-C Lowering of Combination Tablets Ezetimibe/Simvastatin (10mg/20mg) and Ezetimibe/Simvastatin (10mg/40mg) Compared to Atorvastatin 20mg in Patients With Type II Diabetes. [NCT00541697]Phase 3648 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-19Completed
Compare Ezetimibe 10mg and Simvastatin 40mg vs Atorvastatin 80mg Daily in Subjects With Cardiovascular Heart Disease and/or Diabetes Mellitus With Uncontrolled Lipids on Statin Therapy [NCT00395603]Phase 3550 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-09-30Terminated(stopped due to This study was terminated early due to poor recruitment.)
Effect of Statin Use on Aldosterone Secretion [NCT02871687]Phase 1103 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
Evaluation Of The Portal Pressure By Doppler Ultrasound In Cirrhotic Patients Before And After Simvastatin [NCT02994485]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Completed
A Phase 1, Three-Part, Open-label Study in Healthy Adult Volunteers to Assess Vadadustat as a Perpetrator in Drug-Drug Interactions With Rosuvastatin, Sulfasalazine, Pravastatin, Atorvastatin and Simvastatin [NCT03801733]Phase 1134 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-17Completed
Multicenter,Double Blind,Randomized, 2-period, Crossover Study to Compare Ezetimibe/Simvastatin (10mg/10 mg) Combination Tablet Versus Simvastatin 80mg Tablet on Postprandial Arterial Endothelial Function in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome [NCT00817843]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
The Effects of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Versus Simvastatin Alone on Platelet and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients With the Metabolic Syndrome [NCT00819403]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Phase 3 Randomised, Double Blind, Clinical Trial Investigating the Effectiveness of Repurposed Simvastatin Compared to Placebo, in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis, in Slowing the Progression of Disability [NCT03387670]Phase 3964 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-28Active, not recruiting
Phase 0 Trial of Presurgical Cholesterol-lowering on Prostate Cancer Cell Growth [NCT02534376]Early Phase 163 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
A Multicentre Study Comparing the Efficacy of Rosuvastatin With Atorvastatin When Given for a Period of 16 Wks to Subjects With Coronary Heart Disease & a Previously Performed Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [NCT00235950]Phase 4255 participants Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Phase 3, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group Study Efficacy and Safety of Fixed Combination Torcetrapib/Atorvastatin, Administered Once Daily (QD) Compared to Fixed Combination Ezetimibe/Simvastatin for 6 Weeks in Subjects W [NCT00267267]Phase 31,784 participants Interventional2006-01-31Terminated
"A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Factorial Design Study to Evaluate the Lipid-Altering Efficacy and Safety of Coadministered MK0524B Tablets in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia or Mixed Hyperlipidemia" [NCT00269217]Phase 31,400 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Omacor and Simvastatin Therapy in Hypertriglyceridemic Subjects [NCT00246701]Phase 3256 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-01Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lapaquistat or Placebo When Co-Administered With High Dose Statin Therapy in Subjects With Primary Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00249899]Phase 3649 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Overall profile of the compound does not offer significant clinical advantage to patients over currently available lipid lowering agents)
Effect of Simvastatin on CF Airway Inflammation [NCT00255242]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-475 50 mg and 100 mg Versus Placebo, When Co-administered With Simvastatin 20 mg or 40 mg in Subjects With Primary Dyslipidemia. [NCT00256178]Phase 3411 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Simvastatin Treatment of Patients With Acut Optic Neuritis. A Doubleblind, Randomized and Placebo Controlled Fase III Trial [NCT00261326]Phase 364 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multisite, Randomized, Parallel Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Fixed Combination Torcetrapib/Atorvastatin Administered Once Daily (QD) Compared to Simvastatin for 6 Weeks in Subjects With Hypercholesterolemia (A5091030) [NCT00267254]Phase 3640 participants Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Reduced Factorial Design, Randomized, Double Blind Trial Comparing Combinations of Telmisartan 20 or 80 mg and Simvastatin 20 or 40 mg With Single Component Therapies in the Treatment of Hypertension and Dyslipidemia [NCT00316095]Phase 31,695 participants Interventional2006-04-30Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Factorial Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lapaquistat and Simvastatin Alone and in Combination in Subjects With Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00286481]Phase 31,362 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Simvastatin Effect on Endothelium Dependent Venodilation in Chronic Renal Failure Patients Treated by Peritoneal Dialysis [NCT00291863]Phase 430 participants Interventional2006-02-28Recruiting
Magnetic Resonance Characterization of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque in Vivo: Effect of High Density Lipoprotein Elevation on Plaque Morphology [NCT00307307]Phase 469 participants Interventional2000-01-31Completed
Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Statins in the Human Endotoxin Model [NCT00309374]Phase 16 participants Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Phase II Study of Simvastatin Plus Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin(FOLFIRI) for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00313859]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Randomized Phase II Prevention Trial in Subjects at High Risk for Hormone Non-responsive Breast Cancer [NCT01500577]Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A Randomised Controlled Cross-over Trial to Evaluate Evening Versus Morning Administration of a Cardiovascular Polypill [NCT01506505]78 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
A Multi-centre Study to Evaluate the Effects of Valsartan and the Combination of Valsartan and Simvastatin on Blood Pressure (Ambulatory and Std Cuff) and on Biochemical Markers of Endothelial Function (hsCRP, MCP-1, Serum F2 Isoprostanes, PAI-1, tPA, PIC [NCT00385931]Phase 3412 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
Effect of Simvastatin on Pneumonia Prognosis in Elderly Patients: A Study of Immunological, Inflammatory, and Coagulation Responses in Relation to Reduce Mortality During Hospitalization [NCT01651728]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-07-31Recruiting
A Repeated Measures Study of Simvastatin on Choroideremia: Simvastatin Intervention and Reversal in Choroideremia Patients and Age-matched Controls. [NCT01654562]Phase 1/Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Terminated(stopped due to The study has been terminated due to limited participant enrollment.)
[NCT01666067]Phase 4204 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Permeability MRI in Cerebral Cavernous Malformations Type 1 in New Mexico: Effects of Statins [NCT01764451]Early Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Preliminary Evaluation of SIMVASTATIN as an Alternative Anti-inflammatory Agent in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Refractory to Conventional Medical and Surgical Treatment [NCT01771198]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of efficacy with one month of treatement)
A Open-Label, Single Sequence Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Simvastatin Alone and of Simvastatin in Combination With JNJ-28431754 in Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT01821027]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin and Methotrexate in Combination With Tocilizumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. [NCT00365001]Phase 123 participants (Actual)InterventionalCompleted
Aspirin, Losartan and Simvastatin in Hospitalised COVID-19 Patients: a Multinational Randomised Open-label Factorial Trial [NCT04343001]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Grant not obtained)
Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial of Ruxolitinib Plus Simvastatin in the Prevention and Treatment of Respiratory Failure of COVID-19.Ruxo-Sim-20 Clinical Trial. [NCT04348695]Phase 294 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-12Completed
Simvastatin Augmentation of Lithium Treatment in Bipolar Depression [NCT01665950]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of enrollment)
The Effect of Acute Statin Treatment on Inflammation and Peripheral Arterial Tone in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. [NCT00588471]57 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated because not enough subjects could be recruited.)
Randomized Double Blind Study Using Simvastatin for the PRevention Aof Vasospasm in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage [NCT00487461]25 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Study PI left the institution and study was stopped at that time.)
Comparison Between XueZhiKang and Simvastatin on Fatigue: a Single-center, Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT01686451]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Effect of Simvastatin Versus Calcium Hydroxide Used as Intracanal Medicaments on Post-operative Pain and Total Amount of IL-6 and IL-8 in Periapical Fluids in Patients With Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT05525013]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-01Recruiting
Study of Pitavastatin Vs. Simvastatin (Following Up-Titration) in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia or Combined Dyslipidemia and 2 or More Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease [NCT00309738]Phase 3355 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Fixed-Sequence Study To Estimate The Effect Of Repeated Dosing Of PF-03882845 On The Pharmacokinetics Of A Single Dose Of Simvastatin In Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT01445860]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Neurotoxicity Prophylaxis With Intrathecal Dexamethasone and Simvastatin in Adults Receiving Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) Treatment [NCT04514029]Early Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-06Recruiting
Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Exercise Adaptations in Patients on Statin Therapy [NCT02030041]Phase 333 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Targeting Sympathetic Overactivity in Heart Failure Patients With Statins [NCT01097785]12 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Cardiovascular Fixed Dose Combination Pill: A Pharmacodynamic Study of a Fixed Dose Combination of Acetylsalicylic Acid, Simvastatin, and Ramipril in Subjects With Elevated LDL Cholesterol [NCT01004705]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Terminated
Effect of Polipill on Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk : a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01313702]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Withdrawn
Comparison Of Cardiovascular Event Rates In Elderly Patients With Newly Initiated Atorvastatin Or Simvastatin [NCT01304641]31,603 participants (Actual)Observational2009-11-30Completed
Simvastatin Metabolism as a Test for Celiac Disease Activity [NCT03011931]Early Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
A Phase I Study of High Dose Simvastatin in Patients With Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Who Failed to Standard Chemotherapy [NCT03086291]Phase 19 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-04Recruiting
Combined Statin and Vitamin D Therapy for Prophylactic Treatment of Episodic Migraine [NCT01225263]Phase 289 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Early Intensive Treatment With Statins Improves Left Ventricular Function in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction. [NCT01923077]Phase 2140 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Active, not recruiting
A Single Center, Open-label, Drug Interaction Study of MGL-3196 With Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin in Healthy Subjects [NCT02542969]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab (SAR236553/REGN727) Versus Ezetimibe in Asia in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients With Hypercholesterolemia Not Adequately Controlled With Their Statin Ther [NCT02715726]Phase 3615 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-27Completed
Efficacy of the Combination of Simvastatin Plus Rifaximin in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis to Prevent ACLF Development: a Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03780673]Phase 2/Phase 3254 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-03Completed
Randomized Phase 2 Study of Valproic Acid combinEd With Simvastatin and Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel-based Regimens in Untreated Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Patients (The VESPA Trial). [NCT05821556]Phase 2240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-12Recruiting
Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP): The Effects of Lowering LDL-cholesterol With Simvastatin 20mg Plus Ezetimibe 10mg in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: a Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT00125593]Phase 49,438 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Vimentin Expression-based Therapeutic Response in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Combination of Simvastatin and NAC: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial [NCT05550415]Phase 226 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-19Recruiting
Genome-wide Analysis of Lipid-lowering Efficacy and Drug Level of the Two Commonly Used Statins, Simvastatin and Rosuvastatin. [NCT04921657]362 participants (Actual)Observational2014-11-30Completed
A Study to Characterize LY3314814 Pharmacokinetics as a Function of Dosing Duration and to Determine the Effect of LY3314814 on the Pharmacokinetics of CYP3A Substrates in Healthy Subjects [NCT02406261]Phase 182 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Clinical and Radiographic Success of 3Mixtatin Versus Modified 3Mix in Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair (LSTR) for The Treatment of Necrotic Primary Molars [NCT05677945]24 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Simvastatin on Hepatic Decompensation and Death in Subjects With High-risk Compensated Cirrhosis [NCT03654053]Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-02Recruiting
Open-Label Study Of Metformin In Combination With Simvastatin For Men With Prostate Carcinoma And A Rising Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Level After Radical Prostatectomy And/Or Radiation Therapy [NCT01561482]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study closed due to slow/low enrollment; no subjects were enrolled.)
Fixed Dose Intervention Trial of New England Enhancing Survival in Serious Mental Illness Patients [NCT02188121]Phase 4227 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study of Ondansetron and Simvastatis Added to Treatment as Usual in Patients With Schizophrenia [NCT01602029]Phase 2303 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Detection of Atherosclerotic Plaque Inflammation and Visualization of Anti-inflammatory Effects of Statins on Plaque Inflammation by FDG-PET [NCT00114504]43 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of ABT-335 and Simvastatin Combination Therapy to ABT-335 and Simvastatin Monotherapy in Subjects With Mixed Dyslipidemia [NCT00300456]Phase 3657 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
HDL Increased Plaque Stabilization in the Elderly [NCT00127218]Phase 3145 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
A Multicentre 12-week Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial of Simvastatin as Augmentation Treatment for Treatment-resistant Depression [NCT03435744]Phase 3150 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Forced-Titration Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of 145 mg Fenofibrate and 20 or 40 mg Simvastatin With 40 mg Pravastatin Monotherapy in Patients With Mixed Dyslipidemia at Risk of Cardi [NCT00362206]Phase 3423 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Smith-Lemli Opitz Syndrome: A Clinical Investigation of the Effect of Simvastatin in Patients Receiving Cholesterol Supplementation [NCT01434745]1 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Terminated(stopped due to poor enrollment (only one subject enrolled))
Salivary Bmp-2 Levels And Radiographic Measurement Of Bone Density At Extracted Tooth Socket In Patients With And Without Topical Application Of Simvastatin [NCT05369091]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-16Completed
A 16-week Multicenter, 2-period Study to Investigate the Effect of the Combination of Fluvastatin ER 80mg and Fenofibrate 200mg on HDL-C in Comparison to the Combination of Simvastatin 20mg and Ezetimibe 10mg in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome [NCT00385658]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study of Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia and High Cardiovascular Risk and Not Adequately Controlled With Atorvastatin: A Comparison of Switching to a Combination Tablet Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Versus [NCT00782184]Phase 3250 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Effects of Multiple Baricitinib (LY3009104) Doses on the Pharmacokinetics of a Cytochrome P450 3A Substrate, Simvastatin, in Healthy Subjects [NCT01960140]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
A Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety of Simvastatin in Young Adults Treated for Hodgkin's Disease [NCT00746603]3 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor enrollment)
T-reg Function Changes: a Novel Immune Regulatory Effect Underlying Benefit of Statin Use on Lethal Prostate Cancer [NCT05586360]Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-03-30Recruiting
Phase 2 Study of Simvastatin Treatment Effects on Vaso-occlusive Pain in Sickle Cell Disease [NCT01702246]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Statin Therapy to Reduce the Risk of Recurrent Pancreatitis [NCT02743364]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-19Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of REGN727/SAR236553 in Patients With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Not Adequately Controlled With Their Lipid-Modifying Therapy [NCT01709500]Phase 3249 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
The Safety of Simvastatin (SOS) in Patients With Pulmonary Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) and With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) [NCT02061397]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
A Double-blinded, Phase II, Randomized Control Trial to Study the Effects of Simvastatin in Patients With Uterine Leiomyoma [NCT03400826]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-20Recruiting
The Use of Topical Subgingival Application of Simvastatin Gel in the Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis: A Pilot Study [NCT03400475]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-23Completed
Double-blind follow-on Study of Pitavastatin (4mg) Versus Simvastatin (40mg and 80mg) With a Single-blind Extension of Treatment in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia or Combined Dyslipidemia and 2 or More Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease [NCT00344175]Phase 3178 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Pharmacokinetics of Pravastatin and Simvastatin in Pediatric Dyslipidemia Patients: Clinical Impact of Genetic Variation in Statin Disposition [NCT02360826]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-17Completed
A Phase-II, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Simvastatin in Generalized Vitiligo [NCT01517893]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Effects of Epicatechin on Patients With Statin-induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Impaired Exercise Capacity [NCT02490527]19 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
A Prospective Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Carvedilol With or Without Simvastatin in Patients With Portal Hypertension and Esophageal Varices [NCT02465645]220 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-01Completed
Simvastatin Nasal Rinses for the Treatment of COVID-19 Mediated Dysomsia [NCT05542095]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-05-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Study halted prematurely; IRB approval not obtained)
Single Arm Phase 2 Study of Metformin and Simvastatin in Addition to Fulvestrant in Metastatic Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer [NCT03192293]Phase 228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-20Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label, Multiple-dose, Parallel Study to Investigate The Effect of Cilostazol on the Disposition of Simvastatin in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT02431013]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-04-30Recruiting
A 4-Part Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Effect of GDC-0853 on the Pharmacokinetics of Midazolam, Rosuvastatin, and Simvastatin and the Effect of Itraconazole on the Pharmacokinetics of GDC-0853 [NCT03174041]Phase 163 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-18Completed
A Phase 1 Study Using Simvastatin in Combination With Topotecan and Cyclophosphamide in Relapsed and/or Refractory Pediatric Solid and CNS Tumors [NCT02390843]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
Randomized Trial of Simvastatin for the Treatment of Severe Asthma [NCT02433535]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Withdrawn
Interactions of Herbs With Statin Drugs and Potential Mediation by Drug Transporters [NCT05072405]Phase 438 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-11Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Lipid-Altering Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ezetimibe Coadministered With Simvastatin Versus Simvastatin Monotherapy in African-American Subjects With Primary Hypercholesterolemia [NCT00650663]Phase 4247 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-01Completed
A Phase I, Open-Label Study to Assess the Effects of PRC-4016 (Icosabutate) on the Pharmacokinetics of Midazolam, Omeprazole, Flurbiprofen and Simvastatin in Healthy Male/Female Subjects [NCT02367937]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Comparison of Effects of Simvastatin Versus Ezetimibe on Intracellular Lipid and Inflammation in Obese Subjects [NCT04638400]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-01Terminated(stopped due to Lack of recruitment- Fellow responsible for study graduated)
Clinical Study of Irinotecan With or Without Simvastatin in Treating Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Relapsed From First-line Chemotherapy [NCT04985201]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-01Not yet recruiting
Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Comparative Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin + Ezetimibe Versus Simvastatin + Ezetimibe in High Risk Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia [NCT01420549]Phase 3129 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Endothelial Facilitation in Alzheimer's Disease. An Open Label Pilot Study of the Sequential and Cumulative Effects of Simvastatin, L-Arginine, and Sapropterin (Kuvan) on Cerebral Blood Flow and Cognitive Function in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease. [NCT01439555]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
An Open-label, Non-randomized, 2-Period, Fixed Sequence, Single-center Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics of Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin in Healthy Subjects When Administered Alone and in Combination With Fostamatinib 100 mg Twice Daily [NCT01725230]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Treatment of Graves´Ophthalmopathy With Simvastatin (GO-S) [NCT03131726]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-26Recruiting
A Long-Term, Open-Label, Safety Extension Study of the Combination of Fenofibric Acid and Statin Therapy for Subjects With Mixed Dyslipidemia [NCT00300430]Phase 31,911 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Trial Assessing the Effect of Simvastatin on the Pharmacokinetics of Anastrozole [NCT00354640]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
SUPREME: A 12-Week, Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Compare the Lipid Effects of Niacin ER and Simvastatin (NS) to Atorvastatin in Subjects With Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia [NCT00465088]Phase 3199 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Statins for the Early Treatment of Sepsis [NCT00528580]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Terminated(stopped due to Inadequate recruitment)
A Phase 2 Efficacy and Safety Dose-Ranging Study of LY3015014 in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia [NCT01890967]Phase 2527 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Effects of Simvastatin in the Prevention of Pain Experienced After Tooth Extraction. Double-blind Clinical Trials [NCT04406883]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-12Completed
Effect Of Ezetimibe Coadministration With Simvastatin In A Middle Eastern Population: A Prospective, Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial [NCT00652444]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Overcoming Chemotherapy Resistance In Refractory Multiple Myeloma With Simvastatin and Zoledronic Acid [NCT01772719]7 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Principal Investigator left institution-study not continued)
Evaluation of Lipid Lowering Agents on Diabetic Retinopathy and Cardiovascular Risk of Diabetic Patients [NCT04140201]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-29Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Ubiquinol on the Association of Statins and Mitochondrial Oxidative Capacity Using 31P Magnetic Resonance Imaging [NCT01702987]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
An Open-label Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of MK-0431D for the Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Monotherapy [NCT01702298]Phase 342 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-07Completed
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of the Environmental Change in Intestine by Antibiotics on the Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Simvastatin in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT03403972]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-06Completed
Reduction in YEllow Plaque by Aggressive Lipid LOWering Therapy. (YELLOW Trial) [NCT01567826]Phase 487 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
THE EFFECT OF SIMVASTATIN VERSUS COMBINED SIMVASTATIN/EZETIMIBE TREATMENT ON THE CONCENTRATION OF SMALL DENSE LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN PARTICLES IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA [NCT00932620]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Effect of Ezetimibe Plus Simvastatin Compared With Simvastatin Alone on Flow-Mediated Brachial Artery Vasoactivity in Subjects With Primary Hypercholesterolemia (The EFFECTS Trial) [NCT00651391]Phase 328 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-01Terminated(stopped due to Slow enrollment)
Effect of Combination Ezetimibe and High-Dose Simvastatin vs Simvastatin Alone on the Atherosclerotic Process in Subjects With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (The ENHANCE Trial) [NCT00552097]Phase 3720 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-01Completed
Pre-Operative Statin Therapy Versus Placebo in Human Prostate Cancer [NCT00572468]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Comprehensive Magnetic Resonance of Peripheral Arterial Disease [NCT00587678]85 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Vytorin As Strategy To Reduce Dislipidemia In Adults [NCT00651560]Phase 3167 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-01Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Simvastatin Monotherapy Compared With Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe (SCH 58235) in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Treated With Thiazolidinediones [NCT00551876]Phase 3214 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-12-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Trial to Investigate the Clinical Efficacy and Tolerability of Early Treatment With Simvastatin 40 mg Daily for 30 Days, Followed by Simvastatin 80 mg Daily Thereafter in Tirofiban-Treated Acute Coronary [NCT00251576]Phase 34,497 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-11-01Completed
Comparison of Optimal Antipsychotic Treatments for Schizophrenia Pilot Study [NCT00802100]Phase 421 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Phase 1, Randomized, Open-label, Cross-over Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between SSP-004184 (SPD602) and Simvastatin in Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT01979185]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-18Completed
Drug Interaction Study of Henagliflozin and Simvastatin in Healthy Volunteers [NCT03329118]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-24Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Prescription Omega-3 Fatty Acid Added to Stable Statin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertriglyceridemia [NCT02305355]Phase 468 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Benefits of Statins in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients Receiving Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir Combination [NCT03490097]Phase 2/Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-01Completed
Gut Microbiomes and Viromes in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome [NCT03489317]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2017-11-27Recruiting
The Use of Simvastatin Gel With Perforated Resorbable Membranes in the Treatment of Intrabony Defects in Chronic Periodontitis Patients (Clinical and Biochemical Study) [NCT03419429]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, 12-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Tablet Versus Atorvastatin in Elderly Patients With Hypercholesterolemia at High or Moderately High Risk for Coronary [NCT00535405]Phase 31,289 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin and Niacin (Extended Release Tablet) Co-Administered in Patients With Type IIa or Type IIb Hyperlipidemia [NCT00271817]Phase 31,220 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
INvestigating the Lowest Threshold of Vascular bENefits From LDL Cholesterol Lowering With a PCSK9 mAb InhibiTor (Alirocumab) in Patients With Stable Cardiovascular Disease (INTENSITY-HIGH) [NCT03355027]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-30Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Combination of Biodentine and Simvastatin as a Pulp Capping Materials in Vital Pulpotomy of Primary Molars: - a Clinical and Experimental Study [NCT05582317]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-23Completed
A Comparative Clinical and Radiographic Study of 3Mixstatin vs Tri-Antibiotic Mix and Simvastatin in the Treatment of Primary Molars With Inflammatory Root Resorption A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03585751]45 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-30Not yet recruiting
Combination of CAF and Simvastatin Improves Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Increases Tumor-Free Margin in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial [NCT04418089]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-15Completed
Long-Term, Open-Label, Safety and Tolerability Study of SCH 58235 in Addition to Atorvastatin or Simvastatin in the Therapy of Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia [NCT03885921]Phase 344 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-10-25Completed
SCH 58235: A Multicenter, Randomised, Parallel Groups, Placebo-Controlled Study Comparing The Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability Of The Daily Co-Administration of Ezetimibe 10 mg With Simvastatin 20 mg vs Ezetimibe Placebo With Simvastatin 20 mg in Untrea [NCT00653835]Phase 4153 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-01Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single and Multiple Oral Ascending Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of LY3202328 [NCT02714569]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Role of Innate and Adaptive Immunity After Acute Myocardial Infarction BATTLE-AMI Study (B And T Types of Lymphocytes Evaluation in Acute Myocardial Infarction) [NCT02428374]Phase 4300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-05-31Recruiting
Effects of Simvastatin on Clinical, Endocrine, Metabolic and Biochemical Parameters of Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Prospective, Randomized Trial. [NCT00365638]0 participants Interventional2004-04-30Completed
A Study to Determine the Effect of CYP3A Inhibition on the Pharmacokinetics of LY2623091 and the Effect of LY2623091 on the Pharmacokinetics of CYP3A Substrates in Healthy Subjects [NCT02300259]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Study of Lipoprotein Subfractions, Inflammation, Oxidative Stress and Endothelial Function After Treatment With Simvastatin and Ezetimibe Administered Alone and in Combination in Hyperlipidemic Patients [NCT02304926]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Exercise, Statins, and the Metabolic Syndrome [NCT01700530]121 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
A Multiple-Dose, Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of LY3031207 in Healthy Subjects [NCT01632566]Phase 139 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in some participants.)
A Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic, and Drug-Drug Interaction Study of Evacetrapib With Selected Statins in Healthy Chinese Subjects [NCT02156492]Phase 162 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]First Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE) in the Blood Pressure Trial.
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]First Occurrence of a Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE); Specifically Nonfatal Heart Attack, Nonfatal Stroke, or Cardiovascular Death (Measured Throughout the Study) in the Glycemia Trial.
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]Stroke in the Blood Pressure Trial.
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]Death From Any Cause in the Glycemia Trial.
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]First Occurrence of MCE or Revascularization or Hospitalization for Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) in Lipid Trial.
NCT00000620 (6) [back to overview]First Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE) in the Lipid Trial.
NCT00064792 (2) [back to overview]Serum Cholesterol to Total Sterol Ratio
NCT00064792 (2) [back to overview]Cerebral Spinal Fluid Dehydrocholesterol to Total Sterol Ratio
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (MI)
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change in Time Weighted Average Total Cholesterol From Baseline to End of Follow-up
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of AVE (Aortic Valve Events)
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR)
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Cardiovascular Death
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Peak Transaortic Jet Velocity
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) Due to Progression of Aortic Stenosis (AS)
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Incident Cancer
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change in Time Weighted Average Triglycerides From Baseline to End of Follow-up
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Nonhemorrhagic Stroke
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of ICE (Ischemic Cardiovascular Events)
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of MCE (Major Cardiovascular Events)
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change in Time Weighted Average High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to End of Follow-up
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Death Due to Cancer
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Death (Any Cause)
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change in Time Weighted Average Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to End of Follow-up
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
NCT00092677 (19) [back to overview]Hospitalization for Unstable Angina
NCT00114504 (2) [back to overview]Circulating Inflammation Marker
NCT00114504 (2) [back to overview]Plaque Inflammation
NCT00120289 (4) [back to overview]Composite Endpoint of CHD Death, Non-fatal MI, or Ischemic Stroke
NCT00120289 (4) [back to overview]Cardiovascular Mortality
NCT00120289 (4) [back to overview]Composite End Point of CHD Death, Nonfatal MI, Ischemic Stroke, Hospitalization for Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), or Symptom-driven Coronary or Cerebral Revascularization
NCT00120289 (4) [back to overview]Composite Endpoint of CHD Death, Non-fatal MI, High-risk ACS or Ischemic Stroke
NCT00124072 (1) [back to overview]Major Vascular Events (MVE)
NCT00125593 (7) [back to overview]Coronary or Non-coronary Revascularization Among All Patients Ever Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus All Patients Allocated to Placebo
NCT00125593 (7) [back to overview]End-stage Renal Disease Among All Patients Not on Dialysis at the Time of Randomization to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus Placebo
NCT00125593 (7) [back to overview]Key Outcome as Per Statistical Analysis Plan = Major Atherosclerotic Events Among All Patients Ever Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus All Patients Allocated to Placebo
NCT00125593 (7) [back to overview]Major Vascular Events Analyzed Among All Patients Ever Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus All Patients Allocated to Placebo
NCT00125593 (7) [back to overview]Major Vascular Events Analyzed Amongst Patients Initially Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus Placebo (Original Protocol-defined Primary Outcome)
NCT00125593 (7) [back to overview]Non-hemorrhagic Stroke Among All of Patients Ever Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus All Patients Allocated to Placebo
NCT00125593 (7) [back to overview]Major Coronary Events Among All Patients Ever Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus All Patients Allocated to Placebo
NCT00127218 (2) [back to overview]Multiple Combined Events ( Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events as Well as Myocardial Revascularization)
NCT00127218 (2) [back to overview]Changes in Plaque Architecture and Composition Directly Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Aorta and Carotid Arteries
NCT00129402 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)
NCT00129402 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non HDL-C)
NCT00129402 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT00129402 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C
NCT00129402 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)
NCT00129402 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)
NCT00166504 (1) [back to overview]LDL-C Lowering Efficacy
NCT00180713 (5) [back to overview]Circulating Levels of BNP
NCT00180713 (5) [back to overview]Change in Right Ventricular Mass From Baseline
NCT00180713 (5) [back to overview]Change in LV Mass
NCT00180713 (5) [back to overview]Change in 6-minute Walk Distance
NCT00180713 (5) [back to overview]Change in Quality of Life Score
NCT00202878 (4) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of Death From Any Cause, Major Coronary Event, or Non-fatal Stroke (Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Qualifying Event)
NCT00202878 (4) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of CV Death, Nonfatal MI, UA With Hospitalization, All Revascularization Occurring ≥30 Days After Randomization, and Non-fatal Stroke (Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Qualifying Event)
NCT00202878 (4) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of Cardiovascular Death, Major Coronary Event, or Non-fatal Stroke (Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Qualifying Event)
NCT00202878 (4) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Death, Non-fatal MI, or Urgent Coronary Revascularization With PCI or CABG ≥ 30 Days After Randomization (Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Qualifying Event)
NCT00271817 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)
NCT00271817 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT00271817 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)
NCT00271817 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C)
NCT00271817 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C)
NCT00271817 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT00271817 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT00271817 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)
NCT00271817 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)
NCT00271817 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Adjudicated Cardiovascular Event
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Laboratory AE
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Clinical AE
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Hepatitis-related Clinical AE
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Clinical Adverse Event (AE)
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in the LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a])
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in HDL-C
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Apo A-I
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Laboratory Adverse Event (AE)
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Impaired Fasting Blood Glucose
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Diabetes
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=5 x ULN
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=10 x ULN
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Creatine Kinase (CK) >=10 x ULN
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Consecutive Elevations in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) of >=3 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
NCT00289900 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms - Drug Related
NCT00300430 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Reporting Adverse Events During Combination Therapy, Either in the Preceding Double-blind Studies or in This Open-label Study
NCT00300430 (9) [back to overview]Median Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 52 of the Open-label Study
NCT00300430 (9) [back to overview]Median Percent Change in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) From Baseline to Week 52 of the Open-label Study
NCT00300430 (9) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52 of the Open-label Study
NCT00300430 (9) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) From Baseline to Week 52 of the Open-label Study
NCT00300430 (9) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 52 of the Open-label Study
NCT00300430 (9) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52 in This Open-label Study
NCT00300430 (9) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52 of the Open-label Study
NCT00300430 (9) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Direct Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52 of the Open-label Study
NCT00300456 (8) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Lipoprotein Apo B (Apo B) From Baseline to Final Visit
NCT00300456 (8) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Final Visit
NCT00300456 (8) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Final Visit
NCT00300456 (8) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Final Visit
NCT00300456 (8) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)From Baseline to Final Visit
NCT00300456 (8) [back to overview]Median Percent Change in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) From Baseline to Final Visit
NCT00300456 (8) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Final Visit
NCT00300456 (8) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Final Visit
NCT00309738 (2) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C
NCT00309738 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients Attaining NCEP LDL-C Target (< 160 mg/dL)
NCT00309777 (2) [back to overview]National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) LDL-C Target Attainment
NCT00309777 (2) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) at 12 Weeks
NCT00334542 (3) [back to overview]Prevalence of Breast Gene (Estrogen Receptor [ER]-α and ER-β, Cyclin D2, RAR-β, Twist, RASSF1A, and HIN-1) Hypermethylation
NCT00334542 (3) [back to overview]Change in a Panel of Biomarkers (High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein [hsCRP], Lipid Profile, and Circulating Estrogens) From Baseline
NCT00334542 (3) [back to overview]Change in a Panel of Biomarkers (Contralateral Breast Density) From Baseline
NCT00344175 (3) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C
NCT00344175 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Attaining NCEP LDL-C Target at Week 44
NCT00344175 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Attaining NCEP LDL-C Target at Week 16
NCT00354640 (2) [back to overview]Change in Serum Estradiol Levels
NCT00354640 (2) [back to overview]Change in Blood Concentrations
NCT00359281 (11) [back to overview]AUC0-t Atorvastatin Acid (Lomitapide 60 mg)
NCT00359281 (11) [back to overview]AUC0-t Rosuvastatin (Lomitapide 10 mg)
NCT00359281 (11) [back to overview]AUC0-t Nicotinuric Acid
NCT00359281 (11) [back to overview]AUC0-t Nicotinic Acid
NCT00359281 (11) [back to overview]AUC0-t Fenofibric Acid
NCT00359281 (11) [back to overview]AUC0-t Simvastatin Acid
NCT00359281 (11) [back to overview]AUC0-t Simvastatin
NCT00359281 (11) [back to overview]AUC0-t Rosuvastatin (Lomitapide 60 mg)
NCT00359281 (11) [back to overview]AUC0-t Total Ezetimibe
NCT00359281 (11) [back to overview]Area Under Concentration-time Curve From 0 to Last Measureable Concentration (AUC0-t) Atorvastatin Acid (Lomitapide 10 mg)
NCT00359281 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT00384865 (3) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT00384865 (3) [back to overview]Time to Clinical Worsening Events (Number of Events)
NCT00384865 (3) [back to overview]Distance Walked in Six Minutes
NCT00409773 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 6
NCT00409773 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein-A1 (Apo-A1) at Week 6
NCT00409773 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein-B: Apolipoprotein-A1 (Apo-B:Apo-A1) at Week 6
NCT00409773 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Week 6
NCT00409773 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Triglyceride (TG) (mg/dL) at Week 6
NCT00409773 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total-Cholesterol: High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Total-C:HDL- C) at Week 6
NCT00409773 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol(mg/dL) at Week 6
NCT00409773 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein- B (Apo-B) at Week 6
NCT00409773 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non- High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 6
NCT00409773 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C: HDL-C) at Week 6
NCT00409773 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL-C) at Week 6
NCT00409773 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-reactive (Hs-CRP) (mg/dL) at Week 6
NCT00409773 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 6 in Patients Without Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease (AVD)
NCT00409773 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 6 in Patients With Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease (AVD)
NCT00409773 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C:HDL-C) at Week 6
NCT00413972 (1) [back to overview]Percent Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Endpoint After 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00423488 (1) [back to overview]Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Endpoint, After 6 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00423579 (1) [back to overview]Change in Low-density-lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at 6 Weeks
NCT00442897 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reaching the LDL-C Goal (< 100 mg/dl) After 12 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00442897 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reaching the LDL-C (Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol) Goal (< 100 mg/dl) After 6 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00461630 (5) [back to overview]Stroke
NCT00461630 (5) [back to overview]Mortality
NCT00461630 (5) [back to overview]Coronary or Non-coronary Revascularisation
NCT00461630 (5) [back to overview]Major Vascular Event
NCT00461630 (5) [back to overview]Major Coronary Events
NCT00462748 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving a Target of Fasting LDL-C of <2mmol/l at Study End
NCT00465088 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With HDL-C >/= 40 mg/dL, LDL-C Meeting NCEP ATP III Goal, and Triglycerides < 150 mg/dL at Week 12
NCT00465088 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects With Triglycerides < 150 mg/dL at Week 12
NCT00465088 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00465088 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Week 8
NCT00465088 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Meeting With HDL-C >/= 40 mg/dL at Week 12
NCT00465088 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Meeting National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP) III Goal for LDL-C at Week 12
NCT00465088 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00465088 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change in Total Cholesterol:HDL-C Ratio
NCT00465088 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00465088 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00465088 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00465088 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change in Lipoprotein A From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00465088 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change in LDL-C:HDL-C Ratio
NCT00465088 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change in HDL-C From Baseline to Week 8
NCT00474123 (10) [back to overview]Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM)-1
NCT00474123 (10) [back to overview]Soluble CD40 Ligand
NCT00474123 (10) [back to overview]Platelet Function Analyzer [PFA]-100
NCT00474123 (10) [back to overview]Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00474123 (10) [back to overview]Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-1
NCT00474123 (10) [back to overview]LDL Cholesterol
NCT00474123 (10) [back to overview]Interleukin-6
NCT00474123 (10) [back to overview]Endothelial Progenitor Cells
NCT00474123 (10) [back to overview]C-reactive Protein
NCT00474123 (10) [back to overview]Triglyceride
NCT00477204 (1) [back to overview]Change in LDL-c From Baseline to 6 Months in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes Taking Vytorin or Zocor.
NCT00479388 (3) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12
NCT00479388 (3) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12
NCT00479388 (3) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12
NCT00479713 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol
NCT00479713 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)
NCT00479713 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C)/High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) Ratio
NCT00479713 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C (Hs-C) Reactive Protein
NCT00479713 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) Ratio
NCT00479713 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides.
NCT00479713 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Study Endpoint After Six Weeks of Treatment
NCT00479713 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B
NCT00479713 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C)
NCT00479713 (10) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants Achieving Designated Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Levels After 6 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Diabetes
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms - Drug Related
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Consecutive Elevations in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) of >=3 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Creatine Kinase (CK) >=10 x ULN
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 4
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 4
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Clinical Adverse Event (AE)
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Hepatitis-related Non-serious Clinical AE
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Laboratory AE
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Clinical AE
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Laboratory AE
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Adjudicated Cardiovascular Event
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Impaired Fasting Blood Glucose
NCT00479882 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Worsening of the Pre-existing Conditions of Diabetes in Participants With Diabetes at Baseline
NCT00481351 (5) [back to overview]High Density Lipoprotein
NCT00481351 (5) [back to overview]Alanine Aminotransferase
NCT00481351 (5) [back to overview]CPK
NCT00481351 (5) [back to overview]Low Density Lipoprotein
NCT00481351 (5) [back to overview]Total Cholesterol
NCT00486044 (4) [back to overview]Change in Inflammatory Markers
NCT00486044 (4) [back to overview]Changes in Cognitive Performance
NCT00486044 (4) [back to overview]Changes in Regional Cerebral Blood Flow on MRI
NCT00486044 (4) [back to overview]Change in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Beta-amyloid-42
NCT00491530 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Reporting Adverse Events During Combination Therapy in the Preceding Double-Blind Studies or in the Preceding Open-Label Year 1 Study or in This Open-Label Year 2 Study
NCT00491530 (7) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 104 of This Open-Label Year 2 Study
NCT00491530 (7) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 104 of This Open-Label Year 2 Study
NCT00491530 (7) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) From Baseline to Week 104 of This Open-Label Year 2 Study
NCT00491530 (7) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Direct Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 104 of This Open-Label Year 2 Study
NCT00491530 (7) [back to overview]Median Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 104 of This Open-Label Year 2 Study
NCT00491530 (7) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in Very Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) From Baseline to Week 104 of This Open-Label Year 2 Study
NCT00496730 (3) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline After 8 Weeks.
NCT00496730 (3) [back to overview]Change in Lower Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline After 8 Weeks.
NCT00496730 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Attaining LDL-C Goal After 8 Weeks Treatment.
NCT00508027 (11) [back to overview]Change in Plasma NOx Levels
NCT00508027 (11) [back to overview]Change in Plasma IL-6 Levels
NCT00508027 (11) [back to overview]Change in Plasma Hs-CRP Levels
NCT00508027 (11) [back to overview]Change in Hemoglobin Level
NCT00508027 (11) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol Level
NCT00508027 (11) [back to overview]Change in Serum Creatinine Levels
NCT00508027 (11) [back to overview]Change in Serum Creatine Kinase Levels
NCT00508027 (11) [back to overview]Change in Serum Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Levels
NCT00508027 (11) [back to overview]Change in Plasma VEGF Levels
NCT00508027 (11) [back to overview]Change in Plasma VCAM1 Levels
NCT00508027 (11) [back to overview]Change in Plasma TF Levels
NCT00525824 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change in ApoB/ApoA-1 After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment
NCT00525824 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change in LDL-C After 6 Weeks Monotherapy
NCT00525824 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change in Triglycerides (TG) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment
NCT00525824 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change in Total Cholesterol (TC) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment
NCT00525824 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change in TC/HDL-C After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment
NCT00525824 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (nonHDL-C) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment
NCT00525824 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change in Non-HDL-C/HDL-C After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment
NCT00525824 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change in LDL-C/HDL-C After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment
NCT00525824 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment
NCT00525824 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA-1) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment
NCT00525824 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment
NCT00525824 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment
NCT00525824 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment
NCT00528580 (1) [back to overview]Time to Clinical Stability
NCT00531882 (1) [back to overview]Neutrophil Delivery to the Oral Mucosa Using a Non-invasive Mouthwash Technique
NCT00535405 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL-C) at Week 12
NCT00535405 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Achieved LDL-C <100 mg/dL at Week 12
NCT00535405 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Achieved LDL-C <70 mg/dL at Week 12
NCT00535405 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With AVD Who Achieved LDL-C <70 mg/dL at Week 12
NCT00535405 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With High Risk for CHD Who Achieved LDL-C <70 mg/dL at Week 12
NCT00535405 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Without Atherosclerosis Vascular Disease (AVD) Who Achieved LDL-C <100 mg/dL or Patients With AVD Who Achieved LDL-C <70 mg/dL at Week 12
NCT00535925 (2) [back to overview]"Number of Participants Who Achieved of BP, HbA1c and Total, HDL and LDL Cholesterol Goals at the End of Intervention Phase"
NCT00535925 (2) [back to overview]"Number of Participants With Overall Fatal and Non-fatal, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACEs)"
NCT00542178 (4) [back to overview]Development or Progression of Macular Edema
NCT00542178 (4) [back to overview]Loss of Visual Acuity
NCT00542178 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy of at Least 3 Stages on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale, or Development of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Necessitating Photocoagulation Therapy or Vitrectomy
NCT00542178 (4) [back to overview]Cataract Extraction
NCT00572468 (2) [back to overview]Compare the Effect of Pre-operative Simvastatin Versus Placebo on Prostate Cancer Cell Apoptosis and Its Mediators in Men Undergoing Planned Prostatectomy.
NCT00572468 (2) [back to overview]Measure the Effect of Pre-operative Simvastatin Versus Placebo on the Mevalonate Pathway Synthesis and Target Activation in Benign and Malignant Prostate Tissue.
NCT00575965 (2) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival
NCT00575965 (2) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT00587678 (11) [back to overview]6-minute Walk Distance
NCT00587678 (11) [back to overview]Phosphocreatine Recovery Time Constant - the Time it Takes for Phosphocreatine Levels to Recover to Plateau.
NCT00587678 (11) [back to overview]Plaque Volume
NCT00587678 (11) [back to overview]Total Cholesterol
NCT00587678 (11) [back to overview]Log Treadmill Exercise Time
NCT00587678 (11) [back to overview]Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00587678 (11) [back to overview]High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT00587678 (11) [back to overview]V02 - Maximal Oxygen Consumption
NCT00587678 (11) [back to overview]Magnetic Resonance Angiographic Index
NCT00587678 (11) [back to overview]Perfusion Index
NCT00587678 (11) [back to overview]Triglycerides
NCT00647348 (9) [back to overview]Evaluation of Disability (EDSS).
NCT00647348 (9) [back to overview]Disease Impact Specific to the Disease and Rated by the Patient (MSIS-29 Questionnaire Total Score)
NCT00647348 (9) [back to overview]Disease Impact Specific to the Disease and Rated by the Patient (MSIS-29 Questionnaire Psychological Score)
NCT00647348 (9) [back to overview]Disease Impact Specific to the Disease and Rated by the Patient (MSIS-29 Questionnaire Physical Score)
NCT00647348 (9) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Whole Brain Volume
NCT00647348 (9) [back to overview]Evaluation of Disability (MSFC Z Score).
NCT00647348 (9) [back to overview]Evaluation of Disability (MSFC Walk).
NCT00647348 (9) [back to overview]Evaluation of Disability (MSFC Peg Test).
NCT00647348 (9) [back to overview]Evaluation of Disability (MSFC PASAT).
NCT00652327 (1) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline at Study Endpoint, After 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00653523 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Adverse Reactions
NCT00654628 (12) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) Treatment Goal After 6-week Treatment.
NCT00654628 (12) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) Treatment Goal After 12-week Treatment.
NCT00654628 (12) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change of Triglycerides From Baseline at Week 6
NCT00654628 (12) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Total-Cholesterol (TC) at Week 6
NCT00654628 (12) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Total-Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12
NCT00654628 (12) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 6
NCT00654628 (12) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12
NCT00654628 (12) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change From Baseline of High Density Lipoprotein-C (HDL-C) at Week 6
NCT00654628 (12) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change From Baseline of High Density Lipoprotein-C (HDL-C) at Week 12
NCT00654628 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 6
NCT00654628 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12
NCT00654628 (12) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change of Triglycerides From Baseline at Week 12
NCT00656292 (6) [back to overview]Median Concentration of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF)
NCT00656292 (6) [back to overview]Median Concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
NCT00656292 (6) [back to overview]Median Concentration of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
NCT00656292 (6) [back to overview]Median Concentration of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)
NCT00656292 (6) [back to overview]Median Concentration of Creatine Kinase (CK)
NCT00656292 (6) [back to overview]Median Concentration of Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
NCT00676897 (2) [back to overview]Inflammatory Marker Levels
NCT00676897 (2) [back to overview]Time to Shock Reversal
NCT00718328 (1) [back to overview]Perihematomal Edema
NCT00762164 (2) [back to overview]Total Cholesterol
NCT00762164 (2) [back to overview]LDL Cholesterol
NCT00782184 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reaching LDL-C Target Goals of <70 mg/dL
NCT00782184 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reaching LDL-C Target Goal <100 mg/dL
NCT00782184 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reaching LDL-C Target Goal <77 mg/dL
NCT00782184 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides
NCT00782184 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol/HDL-Cholesterol Ratio
NCT00782184 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol
NCT00782184 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL Cholesterol/HDL-Cholesterol Ratio
NCT00782184 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL Cholesterol
NCT00782184 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL)-C
NCT00782184 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-Cholesterol/HDL-Cholesterol Ratio
NCT00782184 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)
NCT00782184 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol
NCT00782184 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/A-1 Ratio
NCT00782184 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B
NCT00782184 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1
NCT00795288 (3) [back to overview]Resting Cerebral Blood Flow During Peak Period of Vasospasm Risk
NCT00795288 (3) [back to overview]Cerebral Autoregulation During Peak Period of Vasospasm Risk
NCT00795288 (3) [back to overview]Impact of Statin on Oxygen Extraction Fraction and Cerebral Metabolism During Peak Period of Vasospasm Risk
NCT00802100 (2) [back to overview]Feasibility of Randomizing a Cohort of Participants Meeting the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria of the Study
NCT00802100 (2) [back to overview]Antipsychotic Efficacy, Defined as Completion of the Trial Without Psychiatric Hospitalization, Clinician Decision to Discontinue Treatment, or Patient Decision to Discontinue Treatment
NCT00804843 (2) [back to overview]Composite Score of Plaque Inflammation/Stability Gene Expression as Assayed by Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Taqman Analysis
NCT00804843 (2) [back to overview]Plaque Instability Protein Composite Score
NCT00812955 (5) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to the Final Visit (Full Analysis Set)
NCT00812955 (5) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)
NCT00812955 (5) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), With ABT-143 Capsules 10/135 Milligrams Versus Simvastatin Capsules 40 Milligrams (Full Analysis Set)
NCT00812955 (5) [back to overview]Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), With ABT-143 Capsules 5/135 Milligrams Versus Simvastatin Capsules 40 Milligrams (Full Analysis Set)
NCT00812955 (5) [back to overview]Median Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to the Final Visit (Full Analysis Set)
NCT00817843 (1) [back to overview]Treatment Difference in (Postprandial-Fasting) FMD
NCT00819403 (2) [back to overview]Biomarkers of Inflammation
NCT00819403 (2) [back to overview]Ex Vivo Effects of Treatment With Vytorin Versus Zocor for 6 Weeks on Platelet Alpha Thrombin PAR-1 Receptor Expression
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in Triglycerides
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in Adiponectin
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in Body Mass Index
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Blood Glucose
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in (Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring) Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in Malondialdehyde
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in Low-density Lipoprotein
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in Insulin
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in High-density Lipoprotein
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in Urinary Isoprostane
NCT00831129 (16) [back to overview]Change in (Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring) Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT00850460 (2) [back to overview]Individualized Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mean Scores (Physical Component) From Week 0 to Week 8
NCT00850460 (2) [back to overview]Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life (INQoL) Mean Scores From Week 0 to Week 8
NCT00858637 (2) [back to overview]Percent Change in Serum LDL-cholesterol Levels From Baseline to Week 16 (LOCF) (ITT1)
NCT00858637 (2) [back to overview]Percent Change in Serum LDL-cholesterol Levels From Week 16 to Week 20 (LOCF) (ITT2)
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]In Participants Treated With Simvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Simvastatin
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Statin (Simvastatin or Atorvastatin).
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Switching Treatment to Rosuvastatin
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]In Participants Treated With Simvastatin at Baseline, Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]In Participants Treated With Atorvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Atorvastatin
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B/Apo A-I Ratio
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I)
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)
NCT00862251 (18) [back to overview]In Participants Treated With Atorvastatin at Baseline, Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)
NCT00879710 (1) [back to overview]Changes in LDL Cholesterol
NCT00903409 (3) [back to overview]Median Percent Change of Lipid Measurements From LOV111858 End-of-Treatment Week 8 to LOV111818 Months 4, 12, and 24 of the Open-Label Extension Trial
NCT00903409 (3) [back to overview]"Median Percent Change of Lipid Measurements From LOV111858 End-of-Treatment Week 8 to Months 4, 12, and 24 of the Open-Label Extension Study (LOV111818) in Switchers vs. Non-switchers"
NCT00903409 (3) [back to overview]Median Percent Change of Non-HDL-C (High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol) in Switchers vs. Non-Switchers Subjects From LOV111858 End-of-Treatment (Week 8) to Month 4 of Extension Study (LOV111818)
NCT00909389 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had an Adverse Event (AE).
NCT00932620 (2) [back to overview]Changes in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT00932620 (2) [back to overview]Changes in Small Dense Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (sdLDL-C) Levels
NCT00935259 (5) [back to overview]Serum Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin-like/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) Level
NCT00935259 (5) [back to overview]Fasting Blood Lipidomic Levels After 2 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00935259 (5) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Delta 5 Desaturase Enzyme Activity Compared to Placebo
NCT00935259 (5) [back to overview]Blood Linoleic Acid Levels
NCT00935259 (5) [back to overview]Arachidonic Acid Level After 2 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00939822 (4) [back to overview]Changes in CSF Beta-amyloid-40 Levels as Measured by xMAP (Multi-Analyte Profiling) )
NCT00939822 (4) [back to overview]Changes in CSF Soluble Alpha Precursor Proteins (sAPP-alpha) and Soluble Beta Precursor Proteins (sAPP-beta) as Measured by Duplex
NCT00939822 (4) [back to overview]Changes in CSF Total Tau (T-tau) and Phosphorylated Tau (P-tau) as Measured by xMAP
NCT00939822 (4) [back to overview]Changes in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Beta-amyloid-42 Levels Compared to Baseline as Measured by xMAP
NCT00943124 (8) [back to overview]Plasma Area Under the Curve (AUC(0 to 48 Hour)) for Simvastatin
NCT00943124 (8) [back to overview]Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Simvastatin Acid
NCT00943124 (8) [back to overview]Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Simvastatin
NCT00943124 (8) [back to overview]Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Nicotinuric Acid
NCT00943124 (8) [back to overview]Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Laropiprant
NCT00943124 (8) [back to overview]Plasma Area Under the Curve (AUC(0 to 48hr)) for Simvastatin Acid
NCT00943124 (8) [back to overview]Total Urinary Excretion of Niacin and Its Metabolites
NCT00943124 (8) [back to overview]Plasma Area Under the Curve (AUC(0 to Infinity)) for Laropiprant
NCT00987558 (4) [back to overview]Simvastatin AUC0-∞ (AUC From Time Zero to Infinity)
NCT00987558 (4) [back to overview]Simvastatin Tmax (Time of Occurrence of Cmax)
NCT00987558 (4) [back to overview]Simvastatin Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration)
NCT00987558 (4) [back to overview]Simvastatin AUC0-t
NCT00988364 (2) [back to overview]L5 Concentration in Metabolic Syndrome Patients
NCT00988364 (2) [back to overview]L5 Concentration After Treatment of Ezetimibe, Simvastatin, or Vytorin in Metabolic Syndrome Patients
NCT00995670 (1) [back to overview]Forearm Blood Flow
NCT01004705 (2) [back to overview]The Difference in LDL Cholesterol Levels Between the Basal and the Final Visit of Each Treatment Period.
NCT01004705 (2) [back to overview]The Difference in Mean Total Cholesterol Between the Basal and the Final Visit of Each Treatment Period.
NCT01061671 (4) [back to overview]Acute Exacerbation COPD Hospitalization Rates (Events/Patient Year)
NCT01061671 (4) [back to overview]Change in FEV1 (% Pred) From Baseline to Last Measure
NCT01061671 (4) [back to overview]Time to First COPD Exacerbation
NCT01061671 (4) [back to overview]Rates of COPD Exacerbations
NCT01097785 (2) [back to overview]Change in Measures of Reactive Oxygen Species in the Blood
NCT01097785 (2) [back to overview]Change in Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Bursts Per 100 Heartbeats
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Serum Potassium
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Serum Sodium
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 18 Weeks Endpoint in EuroQoL Questionnaire - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) With LY2484595 and Placebo
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) With LY2484595 in Combination With Atorvastatin and Atorvastatin Monotherapy
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) With LY2484595 in Combination With Simvastatin or Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin/Rosuvastatin Monotherapy
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) With LY2484595 and Placebo
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) With LY2484595 in Combination With Atorvastatin and Atorvastatin Monotherapy
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) With LY2484595 in Combination With Simvastatin or Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin/Rosuvastatin Monotherapy
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Plasma Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) Activity
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Plasma Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) Mass
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics - LY2484595 Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) at Steady-State
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Blood Pressure (BP)
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]The Number of Episodes of Rashes at Any Time From Baseline Through Week 12
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Plasma Renin Activity
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Serum Aldosterone
NCT01105975 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Serum Bicarbonate
NCT01142336 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CSF Total Tau at 1 Year
NCT01142336 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CSF ptau181 at 1 Year
NCT01142336 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Aβ42 in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) at 1 Year
NCT01225263 (2) [back to overview]Migraine Frequency: Change From Baseline 12-week Period to Weeks 13 to 24
NCT01225263 (2) [back to overview]Migraine Frequency: Change From Baseline 12-week Period to Weeks 1 to 12
NCT01294683 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least 1 Hepatitis-related Adverse Event (AE)
NCT01294683 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to an AE
NCT01294683 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Adjudicated Cardiovascular Event
NCT01294683 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms - Drug Related
NCT01294683 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Consecutive Elevations in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) of >=3 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
NCT01294683 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Creatine Kinase (CK) >=10 x ULN
NCT01294683 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=10 x ULN
NCT01294683 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=5 x ULN
NCT01294683 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes
NCT01294683 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least 1 AE
NCT01304329 (6) [back to overview]Empa: Area Under the Curve 0 to the Last Quantifiable Data Point (AUC0-tz)
NCT01304329 (6) [back to overview]Empa: Maximum Measured Concentration (Cmax)
NCT01304329 (6) [back to overview]Simvastatin: Area Under the Curve 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞)
NCT01304329 (6) [back to overview]Simvastatin: Area Under the Curve 0 to the Last Quantifiable Data Point (AUC0-tz)
NCT01304329 (6) [back to overview]Simvastatin: Maximum Measured Concentration (Cmax)
NCT01304329 (6) [back to overview]Empa: Area Under the Curve 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞)
NCT01304641 (7) [back to overview]Mean Dose
NCT01304641 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Post-index Cardiovascular (CV) Events
NCT01304641 (7) [back to overview]Hazard Ratio for First Cardiovascular (CV) Event
NCT01304641 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Per Dose
NCT01304641 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Adhered to Index Therapy
NCT01304641 (7) [back to overview]Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT01304641 (7) [back to overview]Length of Post-index Period
NCT01420549 (1) [back to overview]Reduction of LDL Cholesterol Levels
NCT01439555 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change in Cerebral Blood Flow as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
NCT01439555 (6) [back to overview]Cognitive Assessment Screening Test (CAST)
NCT01439555 (6) [back to overview]Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale: Cognitive and Modified Version (ADAS-COG)
NCT01439555 (6) [back to overview]Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR)
NCT01439555 (6) [back to overview]Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scores
NCT01439555 (6) [back to overview]Clinical Interview Based Impression of Change + Caregiver Input (CIBIC Plus)
NCT01517893 (7) [back to overview]Change in Sentinel Patch Area
NCT01517893 (7) [back to overview]Serum CXCL10 Levels From the First and Last Available Clinic Visits Were Measured Via ELISA
NCT01517893 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Increase in Investigator's Global Assessment Score
NCT01517893 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Increase in Patient's Global Assessment Score
NCT01517893 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Decrease in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) Score
NCT01517893 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity From of High-dose Simvastatin .
NCT01517893 (7) [back to overview]Change in Quality of Life Score by Using DERMATOLOGY LIFE QUALITY INDEX (DLQI)
NCT01567826 (10) [back to overview]Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Parameters
NCT01567826 (10) [back to overview]Change in LCBI, Lesion
NCT01567826 (10) [back to overview]LCBI4mm Max
NCT01567826 (10) [back to overview]Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Value
NCT01567826 (10) [back to overview]Post PCI Cardiac Enzymes
NCT01567826 (10) [back to overview]Lipiscan - Lipid Core Burden Index (LCBI)
NCT01567826 (10) [back to overview]Change in LCBI4mm Max
NCT01567826 (10) [back to overview]Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
NCT01567826 (10) [back to overview]Blood Chemistry - HsCRP
NCT01567826 (10) [back to overview]Diameter Stenosis
NCT01632566 (7) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Simvastatin
NCT01632566 (7) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of LY3031207
NCT01632566 (7) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) of Simvastatin
NCT01632566 (7) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) of LY3031207
NCT01632566 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More Drug Related Adverse Events (AEs) or Any Serious AEs
NCT01632566 (7) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Time of Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Simvastatin
NCT01632566 (7) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Time of Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of LY3031207
NCT01665950 (1) [back to overview]Change in MADRS (4 Weeks)
NCT01674712 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Change of HDL-C (High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol)
NCT01674712 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Change of TG (Triglyceride)
NCT01674712 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Change of LDL-C (Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol)
NCT01678820 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Week 16
NCT01678820 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) at Week 16
NCT01678820 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-high Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 16
NCT01678820 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 16
NCT01678820 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 16
NCT01678820 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) at Week 16
NCT01678820 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event (AE)
NCT01678820 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 16 (Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC vs. Simvastatin)
NCT01678820 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 16
NCT01678820 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) at Week 16 (Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC vs. Sitagliptin)
NCT01678820 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event
NCT01678820 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 16
NCT01678820 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With A1C Level <7% at Week 16
NCT01686451 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of XueZhiKang With Simvastatin of Physical Activity Level
NCT01686451 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of Safety Laboratory Testing (Cr) Between Simvastatin- and Xuezhikang-group
NCT01686451 (6) [back to overview]Treatment Efficacy
NCT01686451 (6) [back to overview]Comparison Between XueZhiKang and Simvastatin on Fatigue Scores
NCT01686451 (6) [back to overview]Treatment Adherence at Week 4 in Simvastatin- and Xuezhikang-group
NCT01686451 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of Safety Laboratory Testings (ALT,AST,CPK) Between Simvastatin- and Xuezhikang-groups
NCT01700530 (2) [back to overview]% Change in VO2max (Fitness)
NCT01700530 (2) [back to overview]Skeletal Muscle Mitochondrial Content (Citrate Synthase Enzyme Activity)
NCT01702246 (3) [back to overview]Change in Plasma High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein
NCT01702246 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol Level After Treatment With Simvastatin
NCT01702246 (3) [back to overview]Change in Frequency of Vaso-occlusive Pain Events, Before and After Treatment With Simvastatin
NCT01702298 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-high Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)
NCT01702298 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT01702298 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event
NCT01702298 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
NCT01702298 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
NCT01702298 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event
NCT01702298 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)
NCT01702298 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)
NCT01702987 (1) [back to overview]Phosphocreatine Recovery
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Very High CV Risk Participants Reaching Calculated LDL--C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) or High CV Risk Participants Reaching Calculated LDL--C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Very High CV Risk Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) or High CV Risk Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL--C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 52 - On-Treatment Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High -Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1 at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1 at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On- Treatment Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - Intent--to--Treat (ITT) Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 52 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
NCT01709500 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at Week 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A1 Ratio at Week 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A1 Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in LDL-C at at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDL-C < 70 mg/dL at Week 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dL
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Very Low-Density Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Week 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Very Low-Density Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12
NCT01763866 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1), Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve at Steady-State (AUC,ss) for LY3015014
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Antibody (PCSK9) Levels
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Injection Site Reaction
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Develop Treatment Emergent Anti-LY3015014 Antibodies
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP)
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Free Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Antibody (PCSK9) Levels
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT01890967 (10) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C, Total Cholesterol (TC), High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), Non-HDL-C
NCT01952288 (4) [back to overview]CSF Abeta 1-42 Concentration
NCT01952288 (4) [back to overview]CSF Abeta 1-40 Concentration
NCT01952288 (4) [back to overview]Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) T-tau Concentration
NCT01952288 (4) [back to overview]Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) P-tau 181 Concentration
NCT01960140 (2) [back to overview]PK: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Zero to Infinity [AUC(0-∞)] of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid
NCT01960140 (2) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid
NCT01979185 (3) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Measureable Concentration (AUClast) of Simvastatin
NCT01979185 (3) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) for Simvastatin
NCT01979185 (3) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Simvastatin
NCT02030041 (2) [back to overview]Peak Oxygen Consumption
NCT02030041 (2) [back to overview]Skeletal Muscle Mitochondrial Content
NCT02061397 (2) [back to overview]Percent Predicted FEV1
NCT02061397 (2) [back to overview]Safety of Simvastatin in the Treatment of LAM-S and LAM-TS Patients
NCT02096588 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
NCT02096588 (2) [back to overview]Change in Echocardiographic Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS)
NCT02156492 (7) [back to overview]PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Evacetrapib
NCT02156492 (7) [back to overview]PK: Cmax of Evacetrapib Alone and With Simvastatin or Atorvastatin
NCT02156492 (7) [back to overview]PK: Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Evacetrapib
NCT02156492 (7) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under Curve (AUC 0-inf) of Evacetrapib
NCT02156492 (7) [back to overview]Effect of Evacetrapib Single and Multiple Doses on High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), and Triglycerides (TG)
NCT02156492 (7) [back to overview]PK: AUC of Evacetrapib Alone and With Simvastatin or Atorvastatin
NCT02156492 (7) [back to overview]PK: Tmax of Evacetrapib Alone and With Simvastatin or Atorvastatin
NCT02188121 (2) [back to overview]Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Levels
NCT02188121 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants on Adequate Cardiovascular Prevention Care (Defined as Taking a Statin and Angiotensin Medication)
NCT02197234 (7) [back to overview]AUC of Simvastatin
NCT02197234 (7) [back to overview]AUC of Simvastatin Acid
NCT02197234 (7) [back to overview]CL/F of Simvastatin
NCT02197234 (7) [back to overview]Cmax of Simvastatin
NCT02197234 (7) [back to overview]Cmax of Simvastatin Acid
NCT02197234 (7) [back to overview]AUC(0-t) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid
NCT02197234 (7) [back to overview]Tmax of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid
NCT02300259 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax) of LY2623091
NCT02300259 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Time T, Where T is the Last Time Point With a Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-tlast]) of LY2623091
NCT02300259 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Time T, Where T is the Last Time Point With a Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-tlast]) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid
NCT02300259 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) of LY2623091
NCT02300259 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid
NCT02300259 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Leukocyte Rolling Flux Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Leukocyte Adhesion Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDLc) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Apolipoprotein B Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Levels of E-selectin Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Levels of Glutathione (GSH) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Levels of High-sensitive C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Levels of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1 (ICAM-1) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Levels of Tumor Necrosis Factor α (TNF-α) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Levels of Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 (VCAM-1) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Low Density Lipoprotein Size Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDLc) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Membrane Potential Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Leukocyte Rolling Velocity Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Mitochondrial Oxygen (O2) Consumption Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Non-HDL Cholesterol Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Production Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Total Cholesterol Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Triglycerides Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02304926 (20) [back to overview]Levels of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration
NCT02406261 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behavior Based on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
NCT02406261 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic (PK): Area Under the Curve Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-∞]) for LY3314814
NCT02406261 (6) [back to overview]PK Profile for Midazolam: AUC(0-∞) Oral and IV Dose
NCT02406261 (6) [back to overview]PK Profile for Simvastatin: AUC(0-∞)
NCT02406261 (6) [back to overview]PK Profile for Donepezil: AUC(0-∞)
NCT02406261 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More Serious Adverse Events(s) Considered by the Investigator to be Related to Study Drug Administration
NCT02476006 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) and/or >=50% Reduction From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12
NCT02476006 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12
NCT02476006 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12
NCT02476006 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12
NCT02476006 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 12
NCT02476006 (11) [back to overview]Assessment of Participant's Acceptability of Self-Injection Using Self Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ): Feeling About Injections, Self Confidence, Satisfaction With Self-Injections
NCT02476006 (11) [back to overview]Assessment of Participant's Acceptability of Self-Injection Using Self Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ): Self Image, Injection-Site Reactions, Ease of Use
NCT02476006 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT02476006 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 12
NCT02476006 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12
NCT02476006 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 12
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of LY3202328 (LY) in Part A After a Single Dose
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PD: Change From Baseline to Last Day of Dosing in Fasting Total Triglycerides in Part B
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PD: Change From Baseline to Last Day of Dosing in Fasting Total Cholesterol in Part B
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PD: Change From Baseline to Last Day of Dosing in Fasting LDL-c in Part B
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PD: Change From Baseline to Last Day of Dosing in Fasting HDL-c in Part B
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More Serious Adverse Event(s) (SAEs) Considered by the Investigator to be Related to Study Drug Administration Part A and Part B
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamics (PD): Change From Baseline in Fasting High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-c) in Part A
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PK: Cmax of Atorvastatin With/Without LY3202328 (LY) in Part B
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PK: Cmax of Simvastatin With/Without LY3202328 (LY) in Part B
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PK: Steady State Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of LY3202328 (LY) in Part B
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PD: Change From Baseline to in Fasting Total Cholesterol in Part A
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PD: Change From Baseline in Fasting Total Triglycerides Part A
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PK: Area Under Concentration Curve From Zero to Time (AUC [0-t]) of Simvastatin With/Without LY3202328 (LY) in Part B
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PK: Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of LY3202328 (LY) in Part A
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PK: Steady State Tmax of LY3202328 (LY) in Part B
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PK: AUC (0-t) of Atorvastatin With/Without LY3202328 (LY) in Part B
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PK: Steady State Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve During the Dosing Interval (AUCτ) of LY3202328 (LY) in Part B
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PK: Area Under the Serum Concentration Time Curve From Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-∞]) of LY3202328 (LY) in Part A After a Single Dose
NCT02714569 (19) [back to overview]PD: Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-c) in Part A
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24: ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24: ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 24: On-Treatment Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 24: ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12: ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Week 24: ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 24: ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 12: ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) at Week 24: ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 24: On-Treatment Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 24: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: On-Treatment Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 24: On-Treatment Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12: ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) at Week 24: ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 12 : ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) at Week 24: ITT Analysis
NCT02715726 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24: On-Treatment Analysis
NCT02743364 (5) [back to overview]Serum and Pancreatic Secretions
NCT02743364 (5) [back to overview]Change in Health-related Quality of Life.
NCT02743364 (5) [back to overview]Pancreatitis-related Readmissions
NCT02743364 (5) [back to overview]Change in the Endoscopic Ultrasound Score (EUS)
NCT02743364 (5) [back to overview]Change in Peak Bicarbonate Concentration, Measured Using Endoscopic Pancreatic Function Test (ePFT)
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Change in Interleukin 6 at Base to 24 Hours
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Change in Interleukin 6 Baseline to 1 Week
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Change in Interleukin 8 24 Hours to 1 Week
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 24 Hours
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 1 Week
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 24 Hours
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha 24 Hours to 1 Week
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 1 Week
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at Baseline
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Change in Interleukin 1 B 24 Hours - 1 Week
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 1 Week
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 24 Hours
NCT03400475 (18) [back to overview]Change in Interleukin 6 24 Hours - 1 Week
NCT03452891 (1) [back to overview]Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
NCT03454529 (6) [back to overview]Cleaved Caspase-3 (CC3) as a Marker of Apoptosis
NCT03454529 (6) [back to overview]Change in (% Intracellular p27 +) From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment
NCT03454529 (6) [back to overview]Changes in p27 Cytoplasmic Intensity
NCT03454529 (6) [back to overview]Changes in Cyclin D1
NCT03454529 (6) [back to overview]Change in Percentage of Cells P27+ From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment
NCT03454529 (6) [back to overview]Change in Ki-67 Expression Assessed in Tumor Tissue by Immunohistochemistry
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Tanner Staging at Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 48
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C Level at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Weeks 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein a (Lp) (a) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48 - ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting >=15 Percent (%) Reduction in LDL-C Level at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510715 (13) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: On-treatment Analysis
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 30 Percent (%) Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Positive Anti-Alirocumab Antibodies (ADA) Response
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol < 130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Positive Anti-Alirocumab Antibodies (ADA) Response
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Absolute Change From Baseline in Apo B/Apo A-1 Ratio at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Absolute Change From Baseline in Apo B/Apo A-1 Ratio at Weeks 12 and 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cogstate Battery Test - Overall Composite Score at Weeks 24, 68 and 104
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]OL Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 104: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Weeks 8, 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieved at Least 30% Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]OL Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 104: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level Lower Than (<) 130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Weeks 8, 12 and 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50% Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50% Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol < 110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Weeks 12, and 24: On-treatment Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Tanner Staging at Baseline and Weeks 24, 68 and 104
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level <130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 12: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT03510884 (44) [back to overview]DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 24: ITT Estimand
NCT04575090 (1) [back to overview]Change in Pre- and Post-phosphocreatine Relaxation Time

First Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE) in the Blood Pressure Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. Primary outcome for Blood Pressure Trial. (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.7 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
BP Trial: Intensive Control208
BP Trial: Standard Control237

[back to top]

First Occurrence of a Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE); Specifically Nonfatal Heart Attack, Nonfatal Stroke, or Cardiovascular Death (Measured Throughout the Study) in the Glycemia Trial.

"Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. This was the primary outcome measure in all three trials: Glycemia (all participants), Blood Pressure (subgroup of participants not in Lipid Trial), and Lipid (subgroup of participants not in Blood Pressure Trial).~In the Glycemia Trial, a finding of higher mortality in the intensive arm group led to an early discontinuation of therapy after a mean of 3.5 years of follow-up. Intensive arm participants were transitioned to standard arm strategy over a period of 0.2 year and followed for an additional 1.2 years to the planned end of the Glycemia Trial while participating in one of the other sub-trials (BP or Lipid) to their planned completion." (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.9 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Glycemia Trial: Intensive Control503
Glycemia Trial: Standard Control543

[back to top]

Stroke in the Blood Pressure Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal or fatal stroke among participants in the BP Trial. (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.7 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
BP Trial: Intensive Control36
BP Trial: Standard Control62

[back to top]

Death From Any Cause in the Glycemia Trial.

"Time to death from any cause. Secondary measure for Glycemia Trial.~A finding of higher mortality in the intensive-therapy group led to an early discontinuation of therapy after a mean of 3.5 years of follow-up. Intensive arm participants were transitioned to standard arm strategy over a period of 0.2 year and followed for an additional 1.2 years to the planned end of the Glycemia Trial while participating in one of the other sub-trials (BP or Lipid)." (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.9 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Glycemia Trial: Intensive Control391
Glycemia Trial: Standard Control327

[back to top]

First Occurrence of MCE or Revascularization or Hospitalization for Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) in Lipid Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, cardiovascular death, revascularization procedure or hospitalization for CHF in Lipid Trial participants. (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.7 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lipid Trial: Fenofibrate641
Lipid Trial: Placebo667

[back to top]

First Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Event (MCE) in the Lipid Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death in Lipid Trial participants. (NCT00000620)
Timeframe: 4.7 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lipid Trial: Fenofibrate291
Lipid Trial: Placebo310

[back to top]

Serum Cholesterol to Total Sterol Ratio

Total serum cholesterol (mg/dL) divided by the sum of all sterols (cholesterol plus its precursors, 7-dehydrocholesterol - 7DHC, and 8-dehydrocholesterol- 8DHC - in mg/dL). (NCT00064792)
Timeframe: 1 year after therapy.

Interventionpercent total cholesterol (Mean)
Not Simvastatin90.82
Simvastatin93.99

[back to top]

Cerebral Spinal Fluid Dehydrocholesterol to Total Sterol Ratio

Percent of 7-dehydrocholesterol + 8-dehydrocholesterol as a fraction of the total sterols (cholesterol + 7-dehydrocholesterol + 8-dehydrocholesterol measured in cerebral spinal fluid (NCT00064792)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercent of total sterols (Mean)
Not Simvastatin5.898
Simvastatin5.154

[back to top]

Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (MI)

Number of participants that experienced nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg17
Placebo26

[back to top]

Percent Change in Time Weighted Average Total Cholesterol From Baseline to End of Follow-up

Mean percent change (time-weighted average over follow-up) from baseline: Time-weighted average calculated using values at week 8, week 24, year 1 and every 6 months with time interval (days) between 2 successive values used as the weighting factor. For the first follow-up value, the weight was the number of days from randomization. (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg-34.8
Placebo-2.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of AVE (Aortic Valve Events)

Composite endpoint of AVE (aortic valve events) consists of AVR surgery, CHF (as a result of progression of AS), or cardiovascular death (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg308
Placebo326

[back to top]

Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR)

Number of participants that experienced aortic valve replacement (AVR) (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg267
Placebo278

[back to top]

Cardiovascular Death

Number of participants that experienced cardiovascular death (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg47
Placebo56

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Peak Transaortic Jet Velocity

Mean change from baseline in peak transaortic jet velocity (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of follow-up (median = 4.35 years) or pre-aortic valve replacement

Interventionm/sec (Mean)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg0.613
Placebo0.618

[back to top]

Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) Due to Progression of Aortic Stenosis (AS)

Number of participants that experienced Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) due to progression of aortic stenosis (AS) (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg25
Placebo23

[back to top]

Incident Cancer

Number of participants with incident cancer (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg105
Placebo70

[back to top]

Percent Change in Time Weighted Average Triglycerides From Baseline to End of Follow-up

Mean percent change (time-weighted average over follow-up) from baseline: Time-weighted average calculated using values at week 8, week 24, year 1 and every 6 months with time interval (days) between 2 successive values used as the weighting factor. For the first follow-up value, the weight was the number of days from randomization. (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg-14.9
Placebo5.1

[back to top]

Nonhemorrhagic Stroke

Number of participants that experienced nonhemorrhagic stroke (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg33
Placebo29

[back to top]

Number of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of ICE (Ischemic Cardiovascular Events)

Composite endpoint of ICE (ischemic cardiovascular events) consists of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, CABG, PCI, hospitalized unstable angina, and nonhemorrhagic stroke (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg148
Placebo187

[back to top]

Number of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of MCE (Major Cardiovascular Events)

Composite endpoint of MCE consists of cardiovascular death, AVR (aortic valve replacement) surgery, CHF(congestive heart failure) as a result of progression of aortic stenosis, nonfatal MI (myocardial infarction), CABG (coronary artery bypass) surgery, PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention), hospitalized unstable angina, and nonhemorrhagic stroke (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg333
Placebo355

[back to top]

Percent Change in Time Weighted Average High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to End of Follow-up

Mean percent change (time-weighted average over follow-up) from baseline: Time-weighted average calculated using values at week 8, week 24, year 1 and every 6 months with time interval (days) between 2 successive values used as the weighting factor. For the first follow-up value, the weight was the number of days from randomization. (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg6.5
Placebo2.5

[back to top]

Death Due to Cancer

Number of participants that died due to cancer (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg39
Placebo23

[back to top]

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)

Number of participants that experienced coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg69
Placebo100

[back to top]

Death (Any Cause)

Number of participants that died (any cause) (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg105
Placebo100

[back to top]

Percent Change in Time Weighted Average Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to End of Follow-up

Mean percent change (time-weighted average over follow-up) from baseline: Time-weighted average calculated using values at week 8, week 24, year 1 and every 6 months with time interval (days) between 2 successive values used as the weighting factor. For the first follow-up value, the weight was the number of days from randomization. (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg-53.8
Placebo-3.8

[back to top]

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)

Number of participants that experienced percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg8
Placebo17

[back to top]

Hospitalization for Unstable Angina

Number of participants that experienced hospitalization for unstable angina (NCT00092677)
Timeframe: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg5
Placebo8

[back to top]

Circulating Inflammation Marker

Change in circulating hsCRP levels (NCT00114504)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Simvastatin Group Baseline0.09
Simvastatin Group at 3 Month0.06
Control Group Baseline0.11
Control Group at 3 Months0.07

[back to top]

Plaque Inflammation

Change in plaque inflammation was assessed by changes in the plaque SUV. (NCT00114504)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months

InterventionSUV (Mean)
Simvastatin Group1.59
Control Group1.63

[back to top]

Composite Endpoint of CHD Death, Non-fatal MI, or Ischemic Stroke

(NCT00120289)
Timeframe: Time to first event measured from date of randomization through last follow-up visit (common termination) for an average of 36 months follow-up, maximum 66 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ERN + Simvastatin156
Placebo + Simvastatin138

[back to top]

Cardiovascular Mortality

(NCT00120289)
Timeframe: Time to first event measured from date of randomization through last follow-up visit (common termination), for an average of 36 months follow-up, maximum 66 months.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ERN + Simvastatin45
Placebo + Simvastatin38

[back to top]

Composite End Point of CHD Death, Nonfatal MI, Ischemic Stroke, Hospitalization for Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), or Symptom-driven Coronary or Cerebral Revascularization

(NCT00120289)
Timeframe: Time to first event measured from date of randomization through last follow-up visit (common termination) for an average of 36 months follow-up, maximum 66 months.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ERN + Simvastatin282
Placebo + Simvastatin274

[back to top]

Composite Endpoint of CHD Death, Non-fatal MI, High-risk ACS or Ischemic Stroke

(NCT00120289)
Timeframe: Time to first event measured from date of randomization through last follow-up visit (common termination) for an average of 36 months follow-up, maximum 66 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ERN + Simvastatin171
Placebo + Simvastatin158

[back to top]

Major Vascular Events (MVE)

Major vascular events (MVE) defined as major coronary events (MCE [non-fatal MI, coronary death or coronary revascularisation]), non-fatal or fatal stroke, or peripheral revascularization (peripheral artery angioplasty or arterial surgery, including amputations), during the scheduled study treatment period. (NCT00124072)
Timeframe: 6.7 years median follow-up

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Simvastatin 20 mg Daily1553
Simvastatin 80 mg Daily1477
Folic Acid 2 mg + Vitamin B12 1 mg Daily1537
Placebo1493

[back to top]

Coronary or Non-coronary Revascularization Among All Patients Ever Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus All Patients Allocated to Placebo

Revascularization included any arterial revascularization procedure, whether surgical or percutaneous, but excluded revascularization performed for hemodialysis vascular access (e.g. fistuloplasty) or to the donor kidney transplant artery. Revascularization included amputations for vascular disease (rather than for trauma or infection). All potential revascularization events (including angiography) were adjudicated, using pre-specified objective criteria, by clinicians blinded to study treatment allocation and lipid levels. Numbers provided = number of patients with events. (NCT00125593)
Timeframe: Median follow-up 4.9 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe284
Placebo352

[back to top]

End-stage Renal Disease Among All Patients Not on Dialysis at the Time of Randomization to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus Placebo

End-stage renal disease was defined as initiation of maintenance dialysis or renal transplantation. Temporary dialysis was excluded. All potential dialysis and transplant events were adjudicated, using pre-specified objective criteria, by clinicians blinded to study treatment allocation and lipid levels. Numbers provided = number of patients with events. (NCT00125593)
Timeframe: Median follow-up 4.9 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe1057
Placebo1084

[back to top]

Key Outcome as Per Statistical Analysis Plan = Major Atherosclerotic Events Among All Patients Ever Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus All Patients Allocated to Placebo

Major atherosclerotic events defined as non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary death, non-hemorrhagic stroke, or any arterial revascularization procedure (excluding dialysis access procedures). Numbers provided = number of patients with events. (NCT00125593)
Timeframe: Median follow-up 4.9 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe526
Placebo619

[back to top]

Major Vascular Events Analyzed Among All Patients Ever Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus All Patients Allocated to Placebo

Major vascular events defined as non-fatal myocardial infarction or cardiac death, any stroke, or any arterial revascularization procedure (excluding dialysis access procedures). Numbers provided = number of patients with events. (NCT00125593)
Timeframe: Median follow-up 4.9 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe701
Placebo814

[back to top]

Major Vascular Events Analyzed Amongst Patients Initially Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus Placebo (Original Protocol-defined Primary Outcome)

Major vascular events defined as non-fatal myocardial infarction or cardiac death, any stroke, or any arterial revascularization procedure (excluding dialysis access procedures). Numbers provided = number of patients with events. (NCT00125593)
Timeframe: Median follow-up 4.9 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe639
Placebo749

[back to top]

Non-hemorrhagic Stroke Among All of Patients Ever Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus All Patients Allocated to Placebo

Stroke was defined as rapid onset of focal or global neurological deficit, with duration greater than 24 hours. Clinical notes and brain imaging were sought to determine the stroke etiology, and if the stroke was fatal and post-mortem examination findings were available, this information was also assessed. All potential stroke events (including transient ischemic attack and intracerebral hemorrhage) were adjudicated, using pre-specified objective criteria, by clinicians blinded to study treatment allocation and lipid levels. Numbers provided = number of patients with events. (NCT00125593)
Timeframe: Median follow-up 4.9 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe131
Placebo174

[back to top]

Major Coronary Events Among All Patients Ever Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus All Patients Allocated to Placebo

Major coronary events defined as coronary death or non-fatal myocardial infarction. Myocardial infarction adjudicated based on the presence of serial changes in cardiac biomarkers (e.g. troponin, creatine kinase), typical ECG changes and typical cardiac symptoms. If myocardial infarction was fatal and post-mortem examination findings were available, this information was also assessed. All potential coronary events were adjudicated, using pre-specified objective criteria, by clinicians blinded to study treatment allocation and lipid levels. Numbers provided = number of patients with events. (NCT00125593)
Timeframe: Median follow-up 4.9 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe213
Placebo230

[back to top]

Multiple Combined Events ( Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events as Well as Myocardial Revascularization)

Cerebrovascular events (newly diagnosed) such as Stroke and Myocardial revascularization (specifically coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary interventions, carotid endarterectomy) were recorded (NCT00127218)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any Statin Plus Niacin6
Any Statin Plus Placebo2

[back to top]

Changes in Plaque Architecture and Composition Directly Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Aorta and Carotid Arteries

The primary endpoint is Changes in plaque architecture and composition directly measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the aorta and carotid arteries. (NCT00127218)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of internal carotid artery (Mean)
Niacin Plus Statin7
Placebo Plus Statin5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)

(NCT00129402)
Timeframe: baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled Subjects Who Received Ezetimibe With Simvastatin-38.23
Pooled Subjects Who Received Simvastatin Monotherapy-26.28

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non HDL-C)

(NCT00129402)
Timeframe: baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled Subjects Who Received Ezetimibe With Simvastatin-46.84
Pooled Subjects Who Received Simvastatin Monotherapy-32.68

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Least squares mean percent change from Baseline in LDL-C at the end of Step 1 (Week 6) in the pooled groups who received ezetimibe plus simvastatin compared with pooled groups who received simvastatin monotherapy (NCT00129402)
Timeframe: baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled Subjects Who Received Ezetimibe With Simvastatin-49.45
Pooled Subjects Who Received Simvastatin Monotherapy-34.43

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C

(NCT00129402)
Timeframe: baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled Subjects Who Received Ezetimibe With Simvastatin6.58
Pooled Subjects Who Received Simvastatin Monotherapy6.47

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)

(NCT00129402)
Timeframe: baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled Subjects Who Received Ezetimibe With Simvastatin-38.92
Pooled Subjects Who Received Simvastatin Monotherapy-26.69

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)

(NCT00129402)
Timeframe: baseline to 6 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Pooled Subjects Who Received Ezetimibe With Simvastatin-16.56
Pooled Subjects Who Received Simvastatin Monotherapy-12.28

[back to top]

LDL-C Lowering Efficacy

LDL-C = low density lipoprotein cholesterol, measured in mg/dl. (NCT00166504)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionPercent Change from Baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Vytorin-51
Atorvastatin-41

[back to top]

Circulating Levels of BNP

Change in NT-proBNP levels compared to baseline (NCT00180713)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionfmol/ml (Mean)
Arm 1: Control49
Arm 2: Experimental-75

[back to top]

Change in Right Ventricular Mass From Baseline

As measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (the study is powered to detect an 8.5g difference in RV mass between the two treatments, based on reproducibility measurements of RV mass in healthy volunteers and patients) (NCT00180713)
Timeframe: 6 months post study treatment

Interventiongrams (Mean)
Arm 1: Control3.9
Arm 2: Experimental-5.2

[back to top]

Change in LV Mass

Change in LV mass from baseline based on cardiac MRI (NCT00180713)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventiongrams (Mean)
Arm 1: Control-1.3
Arm 2: Experimental1.7

[back to top]

Change in 6-minute Walk Distance

Change in distance achieved in 6 minute walk test from baseline (NCT00180713)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionmetres (Mean)
Arm 1: Control1
Arm 2: Experimental3.1

[back to top]

Change in Quality of Life Score

Change in quality of life score from baseline as measured by Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) scored from 1-25, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life, the investigator reported the score change. (NCT00180713)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionchange of score (Mean)
Arm 1: Control0
Arm 2: Experimental-1.6

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of Death From Any Cause, Major Coronary Event, or Non-fatal Stroke (Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Qualifying Event)

The time (in months) from study start to the first occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: death from any cause, major coronary event (non-fatal myocardial infarction, documented unstable angina requiring hospitalization, or coronary revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting ≥ 30 days after randomization), or non-fatal stroke. A Clinical Endpoints Committee (CEC) reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced death from any cause, major coronary event, or non-fatal stroke within 7 years from randomization. (NCT00202878)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin38.65
Simvastatin40.25

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of CV Death, Nonfatal MI, UA With Hospitalization, All Revascularization Occurring ≥30 Days After Randomization, and Non-fatal Stroke (Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Qualifying Event)

The time (in months) from study start to the first occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: CV death, non-fatal MI, documented UA that requires admission into a hospital, all revascularization (including non-coronary) occurring at least 30 days after randomization, and non-fatal stroke. A Clinical Endpoints Committee (CEC) reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced CV death, non-fatal MI, unstable angina with hospitalization, all revascularization occurring ≥ 30 days after randomization, and non-fatal stroke within 7 Years from randomization. (NCT00202878)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin34.49
Simvastatin36.20

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of Cardiovascular Death, Major Coronary Event, or Non-fatal Stroke (Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Qualifying Event)

The time (in months) from study start to the first occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: cardiovascular death, major coronary Event (non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], documented unstable angina [UA] requiring hospitalization, or coronary revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) ≥ 30 days after randomization), or non-fatal Stroke. A Clinical Endpoints Committee (CEC) reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced cardiovascular death, major coronary event, or non-fatal stroke within 7 years from randomization. (NCT00202878)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin32.72
Simvastatin34.67

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Death, Non-fatal MI, or Urgent Coronary Revascularization With PCI or CABG ≥ 30 Days After Randomization (Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Qualifying Event)

The time (in months) from study start to the first occurrence of any of the following clinical outcomes was recorded: CHD death, non-fatal MI, or urgent coronary revascularization with PCI or CABG ≥ 30 days after randomization. A Clinical Endpoints Committee (CEC) reviewed and adjudicated each suspected efficacy endpoint event while blinded to treatment. Participants who did not have any endpoint event until last visit or who were lost to follow-up and had no event were censored at the time of last available information (last study visit). The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants who experienced CHD death, non-fatal MI, or urgent coronary revascularization with PCI or CABG ≥ 30 days after randomization within 7 years from randomization. (NCT00202878)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin17.52
Simvastatin18.88

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)

Ezetimibe/simvastatin co-administered with niacin extended release compared to ezetimibe/simvastatin monotherapy on the percent change from baseline in Triglycerides after 24 weeks - 24 week measure minus baseline (NCT00271817)
Timeframe: baseline and 24 Weeks

InterventionPercent change (Median)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin23.7
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin + Niacin-42.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Ezetimibe/simvastatin co-administered with niacin extended release compared to niacin extended release monotherapy on the percent change, from baseline in LDL-C after 24 weeks - 24 Week Measure Minus Baseline (NCT00271817)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 Weeks

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Niacin-20.1
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin + Niacin-58.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)

Ezetimibe/simvastatin co-administered with niacin extended release compared to ezetimibe/simvastatin monotherapy on the percent change from baseline in Triglycerides after 64 weeks - 64 week measure minus baseline (NCT00271817)
Timeframe: Baseline and 64 weeks

InterventionPercent change (Median)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-26.8
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin + Niacin-44.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C)

Ezetimibe/simvastatin co-administered with niacin extended release compared to ezetimibe/simvastatin monotherapy on the percent change from baseline in HDL-C after 24 weeks - 24 week measure minus baseline (NCT00271817)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin8.1
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin + Niacin30.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C)

Ezetimibe/simvastatin co-administered with niacin extended release compared to ezetimibe/simvastatin monotherapy on the percent change from baseline in HDL-C after 64 weeks - 64 week measure minus baseline (NCT00271817)
Timeframe: Baseline and 64 weeks

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin9.0
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin + Niacin30.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Ezetimibe/simvastatin co-administered with niacin extended release compared to ezetimibe/simvastatin monotherapy on the percent change from baseline in LDL-C after 24 weeks - 24 week measure minus baseline (NCT00271817)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-53.5
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin + Niacin-58.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Ezetimibe/simvastatin co-administered with niacin extended release compared to ezetimibe/simvastatin monotherapy on the percent change from baseline in LDL-C after 64 weeks - 64 week measure minus baseline (NCT00271817)
Timeframe: Baseline and 64 weeks

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-49.3
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin + Niacin-54.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)

Ezetimibe/simvastatin co-administered with niacin extended release compared to niacin extended release monotherapy on the percent change from baseline in non-HDL-C after 24 weeks - 24 week measure minus baseline (NCT00271817)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Niacin-22.0
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin + Niacin-55.6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)

Ezetimibe/simvastatin co-administered with niacin extended release compared to ezetimibe/simvastatin monotherapy on the percent change from baseline in non-HDL-C after 64 weeks - 64 week measure minus baseline (NCT00271817)
Timeframe: Baseline and 64 weeks

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-45.1
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin + Niacin-52.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)

Ezetimibe/simvastatin co-administered with niacin extended release compared to ezetimibe/simvastatin monotherapy on the percent change from baseline in non-HDL-C after 24 weeks - 24 week measure minus baseline (NCT00271817)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-47.9
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin + Niacin-55.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms

Participants had CK assessed throughout the 24 week treatment period. Participants who had any CK level that was >=10 x ULN and had associated muscle symptoms present within +/- 7 days were recorded. The UNLs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg or MK-0524B 2g/40mg (Pooled)0.1
Atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg (Pooled)0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Adjudicated Cardiovascular Event

Select serious adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality that occurred during the treatment phase of the study were adjudicated by an expert committee external to the sponsor. Those events confirmed by the committee a cardiovascular events were recorded. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: up to 14 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg or MK-0524B 2g/40mg (Pooled)0.1
Atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg (Pooled)0.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Laboratory AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A laboratory AE was an AE reported as a result of a laboratory assessment or test. Participants who were discontinued from the study due to a laboratory AE were recorded. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: up to 14 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg or MK-0524B 2g/40mg (Pooled)0.7
Atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg (Pooled)0.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Clinical AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A clinical AE was an AE reported as a result of a clinical examination or reported by the participant. Participants who were discontinued from the study due to a clinical AE were recorded. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: up to 14 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg or MK-0524B 2g/40mg (Pooled)16.5
Atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg (Pooled)4.9

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Clinical Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A clinical AE was an AE reported as a result of a clinical examination or reported by the participant. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: up to 14 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg or MK-0524B 2g/40mg (Pooled)59.6
Atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg (Pooled)45.9

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the TG levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercentage change (Median)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg-40.3
MK-0524B 2g/40mg-42.0
Atorvastatin 10 mg-21.9
Atorvastatin 20 mg-23.8
Atorvastatin 40 mg-30.4
Atorvastatin 80 mg-33.8

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the TC levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg-28.1
MK-0524B 2g/40mg-30.0
Atorvastatin 10 mg-24.6
Atorvastatin 20 mg-29.4
Atorvastatin 40 mg-34.2
Atorvastatin 80 mg-36.1

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in the LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the LDL-C and HDL-C levels. The LDL-C/HDL-C ratio was then calculated for baseline and Week 12 and the change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercentage Change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg-50.9
MK-0524B 2g/40mg-53.0
Atorvastatin 10 mg-37.6
Atorvastatin 20 mg-42.4
Atorvastatin 40 mg-47.9
Atorvastatin 80 mg-48.8

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the TC and HDL-C levels. The TC/HDL-C ratio was then calculated for baseline and Week 12 and the change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg-41.0
MK-0524B 2g/40mg-42.3
Atorvastatin 10 mg-28.2
Atorvastatin 20 mg-31.5
Atorvastatin 40 mg-36.0
Atorvastatin 80 mg-36.7

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the non-HDL-C levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg-40.4
MK-0524B 2g/40mg-42.2
Atorvastatin 10 mg-31.3
Atorvastatin 20 mg-36.8
Atorvastatin 40 mg-42.6
Atorvastatin 80 mg-44.6

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a])

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the Lp(a) levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercentage change (Median)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg-15.2
MK-0524B 2g/40mg-14.6
Atorvastatin 10 mg0.0
Atorvastatin 20 mg0.0
Atorvastatin 40 mg7.8
Atorvastatin 80 mg8.8

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the LDL-C levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg-40.4
MK-0524B 2g/40mg-42.8
Atorvastatin 10 mg-33.6
Atorvastatin 20 mg-39.8
Atorvastatin 40 mg-45.6
Atorvastatin 80 mg-47.5

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in HDL-C

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the HDL-C levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg26.9
MK-0524B 2g/40mg26.6
Atorvastatin 10 mg7.0
Atorvastatin 20 mg5.3
Atorvastatin 40 mg4.5
Atorvastatin 80 mg3.6

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the CRP levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercentage change (Median)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg-15.4
MK-0524B 2g/40mg-20.0
Atorvastatin 10 mg-19.5
Atorvastatin 20 mg-28.6
Atorvastatin 40 mg-33.3
Atorvastatin 80 mg-38.1

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the Apo B levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg-36.1
MK-0524B 2g/40mg-38.0
Atorvastatin 10 mg-26.9
Atorvastatin 20 mg-32.8
Atorvastatin 40 mg-37.2
Atorvastatin 80 mg-38.3

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Apo A-I

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the Apo A-I levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg10.7
MK-0524B 2g/40mg8.2
Atorvastatin 10 mg1.7
Atorvastatin 20 mg0.4
Atorvastatin 40 mg-0.8
Atorvastatin 80 mg-2.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Laboratory Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A laboratory AE was an AE reported as a result of a laboratory assessment or test. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: up to 14 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg or MK-0524B 2g/40mg (Pooled)5.2
Atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg (Pooled)5.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Impaired Fasting Blood Glucose

Participants had blood glucose levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had the new diagnosis of impaired fasting blood glucose were recorded. A pre-defined set of MedDRA terms was used to identify participants whose glycemic status became 'impaired' during the course of treatment (from clinical adverse experience reports). The MedDRA terms were as follows: blood glucose increased, blood glucose abnormal, glucose tolerance decreased, glucose tolerance test abnormal, carbohydrate tolerance decreased, glucose tolerance impaired, hyperglycaemia, impaired fasting glucose, impaired insulin secretion, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, insulin resistance syndrome. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg or MK-0524B 2g/40mg (Pooled)0.2
Atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg (Pooled)0.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Diabetes

Participants had blood glucose levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who with newly diagnosed of diabetes were recorded. A participant was classified as having new onset diabetes if they experienced an adverse Event (AE) related to a diagnosis of diabetes (based on a pre-defined set of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA] terms), or if they started taking an anti-diabetic medication during the course of the study. The MedDRA terms were as follows: diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus insulin-dependent, diabetes mellitus non-insulin dependent, insulin-requiring type II diabetes mellitus, insulin resistant diabetes, diabetes with hyperosmolarity, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg or MK-0524B 2g/40mg (Pooled)0.9
Atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg (Pooled)0.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=5 x ULN

Participants had AST and ALT levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had an assessment of either AST or ALT that was 5 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST UNLs for males and females were 43 U/L and 36 U/L, respectively. The ALT UNLs for males and females were 40 U/L and 33 U/L, respectively. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg and MK-0524B 2g/40mg (Pooled)0.1
Atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg (Pooled)0.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=10 x ULN

Participants had AST and ALT levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had an assessment of either AST or ALT that was 10 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST UNLs for males and females were 43 U/L and 36 U/L, respectively. The ALT UNLs for males and females were 40 U/L and 33 U/L, respectively. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg or MK-0524B 2g/40mg (Pooled)0.0
Atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg (Pooled)0.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Creatine Kinase (CK) >=10 x ULN

Participants had CK assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had any CK level that was >=10 x ULN were recorded. The UNLs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg or MK-0524B 2g/40mg (Pooled)0.1
Atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg (Pooled)0.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Consecutive Elevations in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) of >=3 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)

Participants had AST and ALT levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had 2 consecutive assessments of either AST or ALT that were 3 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST UNLs for males and females were 43 U/L and 36 U/L, respectively. The ALT UNLs for males and females were 40 U/L and 33 U/L, respectively. (NCT00289900)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg and MK-0524B 2g/40mg (Pooled)0.4
Atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg (Pooled)1.8

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Reporting Adverse Events During Combination Therapy, Either in the Preceding Double-blind Studies or in This Open-label Study

(NCT00300430)
Timeframe: Anytime after initiation of combination therapy (either in the double-blind or open-label study) to within 30 days after the last dose of combination therapy

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin83
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin86
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin85

[back to top]

Median Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 52 of the Open-label Study

(NCT00300430)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52 of the open-label study

Interventionpercent change (Median)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin-53.0
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-47.7
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin-56.2

[back to top]

Median Percent Change in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) From Baseline to Week 52 of the Open-label Study

(NCT00300430)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52 of the open-label study

Interventionpercent change (Median)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin-38.87
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-27.72
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin-39.13

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52 of the Open-label Study

(NCT00300430)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52 of the open-label study

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin-56.9
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-37.7
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin-52.2

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) From Baseline to Week 52 of the Open-label Study

(NCT00300430)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52 of the open-label study

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin-44.8
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-35.5
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin-42.9

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 52 of the Open-label Study

(NCT00300430)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52 of the open-label study

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin-37.9
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-27.5
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin-35.0

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52 in This Open-label Study

(NCT00300430)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52 in this open-label study

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin-48.8
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-36.6
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin-44.3

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52 of the Open-label Study

(NCT00300430)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52 of the open-label study

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin25.2
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin25.1
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin19.4

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Direct Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52 of the Open-label Study

(NCT00300430)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52 of the open-label study

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin-41.6
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-30.2
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin-38.1

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Lipoprotein Apo B (Apo B) From Baseline to Final Visit

[(Week 12 Apo B minus baseline Apo B)/baseline Apo B] x 100 (NCT00300456)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Simvastatin-29.5
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-31.2
ABT-335-17.6
20 mg Simvastatin-22.9
40 mg Simvastatin-32.7
80 mg Simvastatin-38.9

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Final Visit

[(Week 12 HDL-C minus baseline HDL-C)/baseline HDL-C] x 100 (NCT00300456)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Simvastatin17.8
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin18.9
ABT-33516.2
20 mg Simvastatin7.2
40 mg Simvastatin8.5
80 mg Simvastatin6.8

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Final Visit

[(Week 12 total cholesterol minus baseline total cholesterol)/baseline total cholesterol] x 100 (NCT00300456)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Simvastatin-23.9
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-27.1
ABT-335-12.4
20 mg Simvastatin-19.8
40 mg Simvastatin-30.0
80 mg Simvastatin-33.6

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Final Visit

[(Week 12 triglycerides minus baseline triglycerides)/baseline triglycerides] x 100 (NCT00300456)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Simvastatin-37.4
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-42.7
ABT-335-31.7
20 mg Simvastatin-14.2
40 mg Simvastatin-22.4
80 mg Simvastatin-20.2

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)From Baseline to Final Visit

[(Week 12 VLDL-C minus baseline VLDL-C)/baseline VLDL-C] x 100 (NCT00300456)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Simvastatin-38.9
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-51.1
ABT-335-36.9
20 mg Simvastatin-19.2
40 mg Simvastatin-35.7
80 mg Simvastatin-30.0

[back to top]

Median Percent Change in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) From Baseline to Final Visit

[(Week 12 hsCRP minus baseline hsCRP)/baseline hsCRP] x 100 (NCT00300456)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

Interventionpercent change (Median)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Simvastatin-26.8
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-32.1
ABT-335-15.8
20 mg Simvastatin-11.4
40 mg Simvastatin-14.8
80 mg Simvastatin-19.8

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Final Visit

[(Week 12 non-HDL-C minus baseline non-HDL-C)/baseline non-HDL-C] x 100 (NCT00300456)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Simvastatin-30.7
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-35.0
ABT-335-17.3
20 mg Simvastatin-24.4
40 mg Simvastatin-35.9
80 mg Simvastatin-40.6

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Final Visit

[(Week 12 LDL-C minus baseline LDL-C)/baseline LDL-C] x 100 (NCT00300456)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Simvastatin-24.0
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-25.3
ABT-335-4.0
20 mg Simvastatin-22.4
40 mg Simvastatin-31.7
80 mg Simvastatin-40.8

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C

Percent change from baseline in low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (NCT00309738)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD-43.96
Simvastatin 40 mg QD-43.77

[back to top]

Number of Patients Attaining NCEP LDL-C Target (< 160 mg/dL)

Number of patients attaining LDL-C target according to National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) criteria (< 160 mg/dL) (NCT00309738)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD203
Simvastatin 40 mg QD101

[back to top]

National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) LDL-C Target Attainment

Number of subjects achieving National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) LDL-C Target (LDL less than or equal to 130 mg/dL)at Week 12 (NCT00309777)
Timeframe: 12 week

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Pitavastatin 2 mg215
Simvastatin 20 mg69
Pitavastatin 4 mg253
Simvastatin 40 mg86

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) at 12 Weeks

Percent change from baseline in low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C)after 12 Weeks (NCT00309777)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Pitavastatin 2 mg-38.99
Simvastatin 20 mg-34.97
Pitavastatin 4 mg-43.97
Simvastatin 40 mg-42.84

[back to top]

Prevalence of Breast Gene (Estrogen Receptor [ER]-α and ER-β, Cyclin D2, RAR-β, Twist, RASSF1A, and HIN-1) Hypermethylation

Median change in gene promotor methylation (%M) in the contralateral breast of women with breast cancer after six months of therapy (NCT00334542)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline to week 24

Interventionpercent methylation (%M) (Median)
CyclinD2 (CCND2)SCGB3A1TWIST1RASSF1RARBAPCCMI
Simvastatin0.500.210-0.080.01-0.42

[back to top]

Change in a Panel of Biomarkers (High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein [hsCRP], Lipid Profile, and Circulating Estrogens) From Baseline

(NCT00334542)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 24

Interventionmg/dl (Median)
hsCRPTotal cholesterolHigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL)Estrogen (estrone sulfate)
Simvastatin-0.15-54-1-81.5

[back to top]

Change in a Panel of Biomarkers (Contralateral Breast Density) From Baseline

(NCT00334542)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 24

Interventionpercentage of change (Median)
Simvastatin-0.78

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C

(NCT00344175)
Timeframe: Baseline to 44 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Pitavastatin 4 mg-41.81
Simvastatin 40mg/80mg-41.37

[back to top]

Number of Patients Attaining NCEP LDL-C Target at Week 44

Number of patients attaining National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) LDL-C target at Week 44. According to NCEP criteria the target LDL-C is 100 mg/dL. (NCT00344175)
Timeframe: 44 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Pitavastatin 4 mg94
Simvastatin 40mg/80mg42

[back to top]

Number of Patients Attaining NCEP LDL-C Target at Week 16

Number of patients attaining the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) LDL-C target at Week 16. According to NCEP criteria the target LDL-C is 100 mg/dL. (NCT00344175)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionparticpants (Number)
Pitavastatin 4 mg98
Simvastatin 40mg/80mg45

[back to top]

Change in Serum Estradiol Levels

The change in serum concentrations of estradiol at baseline and 14 days was measured. (NCT00354640)
Timeframe: Baseline and 14 days

Interventionpmol/l (Median)
Anastrozole and Simvastatin-3.0

[back to top]

Change in Blood Concentrations

The change in blood concentrations of anastrozole at baseline and 14 days was measured. (NCT00354640)
Timeframe: Baseline and 14 days

Interventionng/ml (Median)
Anastrozole concentrationHydroxyanastrozole concentration
Anastrozole and Simvastatin4.2-0.03

[back to top]

AUC0-t Atorvastatin Acid (Lomitapide 60 mg)

Geometric Mean Ratio ln(AUC0-t) Day 8/Day 1 for atorvastatin acid (Lomitapide 60 mg) (NCT00359281)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Atorvastatin 20 mg + Lomitapide 60 mg152.32

[back to top]

AUC0-t Rosuvastatin (Lomitapide 10 mg)

Geometric Mean Ratio ln(AUC0-t) Day 8/Day 1 for rosuvastatin (Lomitapide 10 mg) (NCT00359281)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Rosuvastatin 20 mg + Lomitapide 10 mg102.05

[back to top]

AUC0-t Nicotinuric Acid

Geometric Mean Ratio ln(AUC0-t) Day 8/Day 1 for nicotinuric acid (NCT00359281)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
ER Niacin 1000 mg + Lomitapide 10 mg79.15

[back to top]

AUC0-t Nicotinic Acid

Geometric Mean Ratio ln(AUC0-t) Day 8/Day 1 for nicotinic acid (NCT00359281)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
ER Niacin 1000 mg + Lomitapide 10 mg110.22

[back to top]

AUC0-t Fenofibric Acid

Geometric Mean Ratio ln(AUC0-t) Day 8/Day 1 for fenofibric acid (NCT00359281)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Fenofibrate 145 mg + Lomitapide 10 mg89.62

[back to top]

AUC0-t Simvastatin Acid

Geometric Mean Ratio ln(AUC0-t) Day 8/Day 1 for simvastatin acid (NCT00359281)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Simvastatin 20 mg + Lomitapide 10 mg138.76

[back to top]

AUC0-t Simvastatin

Geometric Mean Ratio ln(AUC0-t) Day 8/Day 1 for simvastatin (NCT00359281)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Simvastatin 20 mg + Lomitapide 10 mg162.25

[back to top]

AUC0-t Rosuvastatin (Lomitapide 60 mg)

Geometric Mean Ratio ln(AUC0-t) Day 8/Day 1 for rosuvastatin (Lomitapide 60 mg) (NCT00359281)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Rosuvastatin 20 mg + Lomitapide 60 mg132.21

[back to top]

AUC0-t Total Ezetimibe

Geometric Mean Ratio ln(AUC0-t) Day 8/Day 1 for total ezetimibe (NCT00359281)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg + Lomitapide 10 mg105.71

[back to top]

Area Under Concentration-time Curve From 0 to Last Measureable Concentration (AUC0-t) Atorvastatin Acid (Lomitapide 10 mg)

Geometric Mean Ratio ln(AUC0-t) Day 8/Day 1 for atorvastatin acid (Lomitapide 10 mg) (NCT00359281)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hour

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Atorvastatin 20 mg + Lomitapide 10 mg110.97

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Percent change from Baseline in LDL-C (NCT00359281)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 8

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
Atorvastatin 20 mg + Lomitapide 10 mg-30.99
Simvastatin 20 mg + Lomitapide 10 mg-26.43
Ezetimibe 10 mg + Lomitapide 10 mg-28.36
Rosuvastatin 20 mg + Lomitapide 10 mg-41.74
Fenofibrate 145 mg + Lomitapide 10 mg-20.12
Atorvastatin 20 mg + Lomitapide 60 mg-66.02
Rosuvastatin 20 mg + Lomitapide 60 mg-63.20
Dextrometh-rophan 30 mg + Lomitapide 60 mg-46.07
ER Niacin 1000 mg + Lomitapide 10 mg-20.89

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Please refer to the Adverse Event Tables for specific information (NCT00384865)
Timeframe: Measured at 6 months

Interventionevents (Number)
Aspirin 81 mg59
Aspirin Placebo66
Simvastatin 40 mg66
Simvastatin Placebo58

[back to top]

Time to Clinical Worsening Events (Number of Events)

Defined by the addition of new PAH therapies or dose increases in previously stable PAH therapy, hospitalization for right-sided heart failure, lung transplantation, atrial septostomy, and cardiovascular and all-cause death. (NCT00384865)
Timeframe: Measured at 6 months

Interventionevents (Number)
Aspirin 81 mg2
Aspirin Placebo6
Simvastatin 40 mg4
Simvastatin Placebo4

[back to top]

Distance Walked in Six Minutes

(NCT00384865)
Timeframe: Measured at 6 months

Interventionmeters (Least Squares Mean)
Aspirin 81 mg438.0
Aspirin Placebo438.5
Simvastatin 40 mg425.0
Simvastatin Placebo452.7

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 6

(NCT00409773)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Atorva 10 mg3.4
EZ/Simva 10 mg/20 mg6.8
Atorva 20mg5.6
EZ/Simva 10 mg/40 mg8.8
Atorva 40 mg4.9

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein-A1 (Apo-A1) at Week 6

(NCT00409773)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Atorva 10 mg0.8
EZ/Simva 10 mg/20 mg3.2
Atorva 20mg1.0
EZ/Simva 10 mg/40 mg3.0
Atorva 40 mg1.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein-B: Apolipoprotein-A1 (Apo-B:Apo-A1) at Week 6

(NCT00409773)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Atorva 10 mg-27.4
EZ/Simva 10 mg/20 mg-38.4
Atorva 20mg-32.0
EZ/Simva 10 mg/40 mg-41.9
Atorva 40 mg-36.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Week 6

(NCT00409773)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Atorva 10 mg-17.7
EZ/Simva 10 mg/20 mg-18.3
Atorva 20mg-21.6
EZ/Simva 10 mg/40 mg-23.4
Atorva 40 mg-22.7

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Triglyceride (TG) (mg/dL) at Week 6

(NCT00409773)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Median)
Atorva 10 mg-21.7
EZ/Simva 10 mg/20 mg-23.3
Atorva 20mg-27.5
EZ/Simva 10 mg/40 mg-29.5
Atorva 40 mg-30.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total-Cholesterol: High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Total-C:HDL- C) at Week 6

(NCT00409773)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Atorva 10 mg-28.1
EZ/Simva 10 mg/20 mg-36.9
Atorva 20mg-31.5
EZ/Simva 10 mg/40 mg-41.2
Atorva 40 mg-35.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol(mg/dL) at Week 6

(NCT00409773)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Atorva 10 mg-26.5
EZ/Simva 10 mg/20 mg-33.7
Atorva 20mg-28.3
EZ/Simva 10 mg/40 mg-37.3
Atorva 40 mg-32.8

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein- B (Apo-B) at Week 6

(NCT00409773)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Atorva 10 mg-27.9
EZ/Simva 10 mg/20 mg-37.2
Atorva 20mg-31.9
EZ/Simva 10 mg/40 mg-41.1
Atorva 40 mg-35.8

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non- High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 6

(NCT00409773)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Atorva 10 mg-33.5
EZ/Simva 10 mg/20 mg-43.8
Atorva 20mg-36.5
EZ/Simva 10 mg/40 mg-48.3
Atorva 40 mg-41.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C: HDL-C) at Week 6

(NCT00409773)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Atorva 10 mg-37.8
EZ/Simva 10 mg/20 mg-51.8
Atorva 20mg-42.1
EZ/Simva 10 mg/40 mg-56.6
Atorva 40 mg-48.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL-C) at Week 6

(NCT00409773)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Atorva 10 mg-36.5
EZ/Simva 10 mg/20 mg-49.6
Atorva 20mg-39.4
EZ/Simva 10 mg/40 mg-53.9
Atorva 40 mg-46.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-reactive (Hs-CRP) (mg/dL) at Week 6

(NCT00409773)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Median)
Atorva 10 mg-16.8
EZ/Simva 10 mg/20 mg-17.2
Atorva 20mg-22.4
EZ/Simva 10 mg/40 mg-27.6
Atorva 40 mg-30.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 6 in Patients Without Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease (AVD)

(NCT00409773)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Atorva 10 mg-36.3
EZ/Simva 10 mg/20 mg-50.1
Atorva 20mg-40.3
EZ/Simva 10 mg/40 mg-53.2
Atorva 40 mg-46.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 6 in Patients With Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease (AVD)

(NCT00409773)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Atorva 10 mg-37.1
EZ/Simva 10 mg/20 mg-48.7
Atorva 20mg-36.9
EZ/Simva 10 mg/40 mg-56.1
Atorva 40 mg-45.8

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C:HDL-C) at Week 6

(NCT00409773)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Atorva 10 mg-34.7
EZ/Simva 10 mg/20 mg-46.2
Atorva 20mg-39.2
EZ/Simva 10 mg/40 mg-51.2
Atorva 40 mg-43.5

[back to top]

Percent Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Endpoint After 8 Weeks of Treatment

(NCT00413972)
Timeframe: Baseline, 8 weeks

Interventionpercent change of LDL-C (Mean)
Vytorin 10/10-41.69
Vytorin 10/20-46.83
Vytorin 10/40-49.10
Placebo-7.53

[back to top]

Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Endpoint, After 6 Weeks of Treatment

(NCT00423488)
Timeframe: 6 weeks of treatment (from Baseline to Endpoint)

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg + Simvastatin Placebo + Simvastatin 20 mg-32.2
Ezetimibe Placebo + Simvastatin 40 mg-20.8

[back to top]

Change in Low-density-lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at 6 Weeks

Percentage change in LDL C from baseline to endpoint after 6 weeks of treatment. (NCT00423579)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg + Simvastatin Placebo-26.5
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Placebo + Simvastatin 40 mg-11.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reaching the LDL-C Goal (< 100 mg/dl) After 12 Weeks of Treatment

If patients didn't achieve LDL-C <100 mg/dl after 6 weeks of treatment, they received the double dosage of study drug for the next 6 weeks (vytorin 10/40 or atorvastatin 20 mg) and If achieved LDL-C < 100 mg/dl, they received the same dosage of study drug for the next 6 weeks. (NCT00442897)
Timeframe: After 12 weeks of the treatment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Vytorin85
Atorvastatin63

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reaching the LDL-C (Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol) Goal (< 100 mg/dl) After 6 Weeks of Treatment

Primary objective is to evaluate the proportion of patients achieving LDL-C target <100 mg/dl recommend in National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) after 6 weeks of treatment(vytorin 10/20 vs. atorvastatin 10 mg) (NCT00442897)
Timeframe: After 6 weeks of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Vytorin89
Atorvastatin63

[back to top]

Stroke

Fatal or non-fatal (NCT00461630)
Timeframe: During scheduled treatment period (median duration 3.9 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ER Niacin/Laropiprant498
Placebo499

[back to top]

Mortality

All-cause mortality (NCT00461630)
Timeframe: During scheduled treatment period (median duration 3.9 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ER Niacin/Laropiprant798
Placebo732

[back to top]

Coronary or Non-coronary Revascularisation

(NCT00461630)
Timeframe: During scheduled treatment period (median duration 3.9 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ER Niacin/Laropiprant807
Placebo897

[back to top]

Major Vascular Event

Non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary death, non-fatal or fatal stroke, or revascularisation (NCT00461630)
Timeframe: During scheduled treatment period (median duration 3.9 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ER Niacin/Laropiprant1696
Placebo1758

[back to top]

Major Coronary Events

Non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary death (NCT00461630)
Timeframe: During scheduled treatment period (median duration 3.9 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ER Niacin/Laropiprant668
Placebo694

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving a Target of Fasting LDL-C of <2mmol/l at Study End

Fasting LDL-C was the primary efficacy variable. The primary efficacy analysis was based on the proportion of patients achieving a target of <2mmol/l in fasting LDL-C at study end. (NCT00462748)
Timeframe: 6 Weeks

InterventionPercent (Number)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin67.4
Atorvostatin36.3
Rosuvastatin17.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With HDL-C >/= 40 mg/dL, LDL-C Meeting NCEP ATP III Goal, and Triglycerides < 150 mg/dL at Week 12

NCEP ATP III goals for LDL-C are as follows: For high-risk patients, LDL-C < 100 mg/dL; for moderate risk patients, LDL-C < 130 mg/dL; for low-risk patients: LDL-C < 160 mg/dL. High-risk means coronary heart disease or risk equivalents; moderate risk means having at least 2 risk factors; low-risk means having no or 1 risk factor. (NCT00465088)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
Niacin Extended-release Plus Simvastatin65
Atorvastatin34

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects With Triglycerides < 150 mg/dL at Week 12

(NCT00465088)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
Niacin Extended-release Plus Simvastatin79
Atorvastatin70

[back to top]

Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 12

(Week 12 HDL-C minus baseline HDL-C) x 100/baseline HDL-C (NCT00465088)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Niacin Extended-release Plus Simvastatin30.1
Atorvastatin9.4

[back to top]

Percent Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Week 8

(Week 8 non-HDL-C minus baseline non-HDL-C) x 100/baseline non-HDL-C (NCT00465088)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 8

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Niacin Extended-release Plus Simvastatin-45.0
Atorvastatin-44.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Meeting With HDL-C >/= 40 mg/dL at Week 12

(NCT00465088)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
Niacin Extended-release Plus Simvastatin78
Atorvastatin28

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Meeting National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP) III Goal for LDL-C at Week 12

For high-risk patients (coronary heart disease or equivalent), LDL-C < 100 mg/dL and non-HDL-C < 130 mg/dL; for moderate risk patients (having 2 risk factors), LDL-C < 130 mg/dL and non-HDL-C < 160 mg/dL; for low-risk patients (having 0 or 1 risk factor): LDL-C < 160 mg/dL and non-HDL-C < 190 mg/dL. (NCT00465088)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
Niacin Extended-release Plus Simvastatin78
Atorvastatin84

[back to top]

Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 12

(Week 12 triglycerides minus baseline triglycerides) x 100/baseline triglycerides (NCT00465088)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Niacin Extended-release Plus Simvastatin-44.0
Atorvastatin-37.0

[back to top]

Percent Change in Total Cholesterol:HDL-C Ratio

(Week 12 total cholesterol:HDL-C ratio minus baseline total cholesterol:HDL-C ratio) x 100/baseline total cholesterol:HDL-C ratio (NCT00465088)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Niacin Extended-release Plus Simvastatin-45.2
Atorvastatin-40.3

[back to top]

Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12

(Week 12 total cholesterol minus baseline total cholesterol) x 100/baseline total cholesterol (NCT00465088)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Niacin Extended-release Plus Simvastatin-31.3
Atorvastatin-35.1

[back to top]

Percent Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Week 12

(Week 12 non-HDL-C minus baseline non-HDL-C) x 100/baseline non-HDL-C (NCT00465088)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Niacin Extended-release Plus Simvastatin-43.4
Atorvastatin-43.3

[back to top]

Percent Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 12

(Week 12 LDL-C minus baseline LDL-C) x 100/baseline LDL-C (NCT00465088)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Niacin Extended-release Plus Simvastatin-43.8
Atorvastatin-46.0

[back to top]

Percent Change in Lipoprotein A From Baseline to Week 12

(Week 12 lipoprotein A minus baseline lipoprotein A) x 100/baseline lipoprotein A (NCT00465088)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Niacin Extended-release Plus Simvastatin-15.8
Atorvastatin16.0

[back to top]

Percent Change in LDL-C:HDL-C Ratio

(Week 12 LDL-C:HDL-C ratio minus baseline LDL-C:HDL-C ratio) x 100/baseline LDL-C:HDL-C ratio (NCT00465088)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Niacin Extended-release Plus Simvastatin-54.5
Atorvastatin-50.5

[back to top]

Percent Change in HDL-C From Baseline to Week 8

(Week 8 HDL-C minus baseline HDL-C) x 100/baseline HDL-C (NCT00465088)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 8

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Niacin Extended-release Plus Simvastatin26.7
Atorvastatin1.4

[back to top]

Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM)-1

serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting MCP-1/ICAM-1 (R&D Systems, Europe, Abingdon, UK) (NCT00474123)
Timeframe: Change from baseline at 6 weeks

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Simvastatin 80 mg10
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg10

[back to top]

Soluble CD40 Ligand

A commercial ELISA assay detecting sCD40L (R&D Systems, USA) was applied. Detection limits and intra-assay variability was respectively, as follows: sCD-40L 15.6 pg/mL (intra-assay variability not available). (NCT00474123)
Timeframe: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and after at the conclusions of the six weeks study period.

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Simvastatin 80 mg6
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg6

[back to top]

Platelet Function Analyzer [PFA]-100

Samples were collected in 3.8% sodium citrate (buffered, pH 5.5, Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson, Plymouth, UK) for platelet function tests. Platelet function assays were processed within 2 hours of blood collection. The PFA-100 records the closure time (CT), witch means the time in seconds (s) from the start of the test until the platelet plug occludes the aperture. (NCT00474123)
Timeframe: Change from baseline at 6 weeks

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
Simvastatin 80 mg27
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg8

[back to top]

Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting oxLDL (Mercodia, USA) were applied. (NCT00474123)
Timeframe: Change from baseline at 6 weeks

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
Simvastatin 80 mg-18
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg-15

[back to top]

Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-1

Serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting MCP-1/ICAM-1 (R&D Systems, Europe, Abingdon, UK). (NCT00474123)
Timeframe: Change from baseline at 6 weeks

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Simvastatin 80 mg11
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg10

[back to top]

LDL Cholesterol

(NCT00474123)
Timeframe: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Simvastatin 80 mg-28
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg-29

[back to top]

Interleukin-6

A commercial ELISA assay detecting IL-6 (Siemens, USA) was applied. (NCT00474123)
Timeframe: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and after at the conclusions of the six weeks study period.

Interventionpercentage (Median)
Simvastatin 80 mg0
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg0

[back to top]

Endothelial Progenitor Cells

Endothelial progenitor cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. Selected cells were positive for CD31, CD34 and VEGFR receptors. (NCT00474123)
Timeframe: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Simvastatin 80 mg0.4
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg0.1

[back to top]

C-reactive Protein

Serum was separated by centrifugation from the blood samples. For high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein measurement, whole venous blood was collected in tubes without anticoagulant and centrifuged at room temperature. Serum C-Reactive Protein was assessed with a high-sensitivity, latex microparticle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay (Behring Nephelometer Analyzer System; Behring Diagnostics, Somerville, NJ). (NCT00474123)
Timeframe: Change from baseline at 6 weeks

InterventionPercentage (Median)
Simvastatin 80 mg-16
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg-11

[back to top]

Triglyceride

(NCT00474123)
Timeframe: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Simvastatin 80 mg-4
Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg-14

[back to top]

Change in LDL-c From Baseline to 6 Months in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes Taking Vytorin or Zocor.

Change in LDL-c between Zocor and Vytorin treatment in subjects with Type 1 Diabetes measured at baseline to the 6-month study visit. (NCT00477204)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Vytorin (Ezetimibe/Simvastatin)-67
Zocor (Simvastatin)-6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12

(NCT00479388)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Weeks

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
ER Niacin/Laropiprant + Run-in Statin15.8
Run-in Statin Dose Doubled0.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12

(NCT00479388)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Weeks

InterventionPercent (Median)
ER Niacin/Laropiprant + Run-in Statin-17.6
Run-in Statin Dose Doubled-4.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12

(NCT00479388)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Weeks

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
ER Niacin/Laropiprant + Run-in Statin-10.0
Run-in Statin Dose Doubled-5.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol

Percent change from baseline in total cholesterol at study endpoint after 6 weeks of treatment is calculated as the difference between week 6 measure and baseline measure divided by baseline measure *100. (NCT00479713)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetemibe + Simvastatin-17.53
Rosuvastatin-10.33

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)

Percent change from baseline in non HDL-C at study endpoint after 6 weeks of treatment is calculated as the difference between week 6 measure and baseline measure divided by baseline measure *100. (NCT00479713)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetemibe + Simvastatin-23.42
Rosuvastatin-14.01

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C)/High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) Ratio

Percent change from baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C ratio at study endpoint after 6 weeks of treatment is calculated as the difference between week 6 measure and baseline measure divided by baseline measure *100. (NCT00479713)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetemibe + Simvastatin-27.41
Rosuvastatin-17.82

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C (Hs-C) Reactive Protein

Percent change from baseline in hs-C reactive protein at study endpoint after 6 weeks of treatment is calculated as the difference between week 6 measure and baseline measure divided by baseline measure *100. (NCT00479713)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Median)
Ezetemibe + Simvastatin-8.33
Rosuvastatin0.00

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) Ratio

Percent change from baseline in total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio at study endpoint after 6 weeks of treatment is calculated as the difference between week 6 measure and baseline measure divided by baseline measure *100. (NCT00479713)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetemibe + Simvastatin-17.76
Rosuvastatin-11.51

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides.

Percent change from baseline in triglycerides at study endpoint after 6 weeks of treatment is calculated as the difference between week 6 measure and baseline measure divided by baseline measure *100. (NCT00479713)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Median)
Ezetemibe + Simvastatin-11.00
Rosuvastatin-5.26

[back to top]

Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Study Endpoint After Six Weeks of Treatment

Percent Change in LDL-C at study endpoint after six weeks of treatment is calculated as the difference between week 6 measure and baseline measure divided by baseline measure *100. (NCT00479713)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetemibe + Simvastatin-27.66
Rosuvastatin-16.94

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B

Percent change from baseline in apolipoprotein (Apo) B at study endpoint after 6 weeks of treatment is calculated as the difference between week 6 measure and baseline measure divided by baseline measure *100. (NCT00479713)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetemibe + Simvastatin-17.87
Rosuvastatin-9.77

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C)

Percent change from baseline in HDL-C at study endpoint after 6 weeks of treatment is calculated as the difference between week 6 measure and baseline measure divided by baseline measure *100. (NCT00479713)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetemibe + Simvastatin2.12
Rosuvastatin3.03

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants Achieving Designated Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Levels After 6 Weeks of Treatment

"The percentage of participants who achieved a target LDL-C goal of < 100 mg/dL, of <70 mg/dL, and of <77 mg/dL at study endpoint after six weeks of treatment.~The numerator is the number of participants in a treatment group who achieved a target LDL-C goal and the denominator is the total number of participants within that treatment group." (NCT00479713)
Timeframe: after 6 weeks of treatment

,
InterventionPercent of participant population (Number)
LDL-C <100LDL-C <70
Ezetemibe + Simvastatin72.4625.25
Rosuvastatin56.2311.11

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Diabetes

Participants who with newly diagnosed of diabetes were recorded. A participant was classified as having new onset diabetes if they experienced an adverse Event (AE) related to a diagnosis of diabetes (based on a pre-defined set of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA] terms), or if they started taking an anti-diabetic medication during the course of the study. The MedDRA terms were as follows: diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus insulin-dependent, diabetes mellitus non-insulin dependent, insulin-requiring type II diabetes mellitus, insulin resistant diabetes, diabetes with hyperosmolarity, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults. (NCT00479882)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg0.4
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg0.7
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg0.5
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg0.7
Sequence 3: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg0.6
Sequence 4: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg0.4
Sequence 3: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg0.7
Sequence 4: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg0.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Consecutive Elevations in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) of >=3 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)

Participants had AST and ALT levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had an assessment of either AST or ALT that was 3 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST ULNs for males and females were 43 U/L and 36 U/L, respectively. The ALT ULNs for males and females were 40 U/L and 33 U/L, respectively. (NCT00479882)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg0.3
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg0.5
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg0.6
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg0.9
Sequence 3: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg0.7
Sequence 4: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg1.0
Sequence 3: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg0.5
Sequence 4: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg0.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Creatine Kinase (CK) >=10 x ULN

Participants had CK levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had an assessment of CK that was 10 x ULN or greater were recorded. The ULNs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively. (NCT00479882)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg0.0
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg0.0
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg0.4
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg0.0
Sequence 3: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg0.4
Sequence 4: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg0.2
Sequence 3: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg0.0
Sequence 4: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg0.0

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 4

Blood samples taken at baseline (Day1 of Period I) and after 4 weeks of treatment to determine the HDL-C levels. The change from baseline after 4 weeks of treatment was recorded. (NCT00479882)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day1 of Period I) and Week 4

InterventionPercentage Change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-0524B 0.9g/10mg18.3
MK-0524A 1g+Simvastatin 10mg18.7
MK-0524B 0.9 g/40 mg19.8
MK-0524A 1 g + Simvastatin 40 mg19.6

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)

Blood samples taken at baseline (Week 4 for Period II; Week 12 for Period III) and after 8 weeks of treatment during each period to determine the HDL-C levels. The change from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment was recorded. (NCT00479882)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 4 for Period II; Week 12 for Period III) and after 8 weeks of treatment during each period (Week 12 for Period II and Week 20 for Period III)

InterventionPercentage Change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg27.4
MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg27.6
MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg27.7
MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg28.5

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 4

Blood samples taken at baseline (Day1 of Period I) and after 4 weeks of treatment to determine the LDL-C levels. The change from baseline after 4 weeks of treatment was recorded. (NCT00479882)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day1 of Period I) and Week 4

InterventionPercentage Change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-0524B 0.9g/10mg-34.8
MK-0524A 1g+Simvastatin 10mg-35.8
MK-0524B 0.9 g/40 mg-42.2
MK-0524A 1 g + Simvastatin 40 mg-45.8

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Blood samples taken at baseline (Week 4 for Period II; Week 12 for Period III) and after 8 weeks of treatment during each period to determine the LDL-C levels. The change from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment was recorded. (NCT00479882)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 4 for Period II; Week 12 for Period III) and after 8 weeks of treatment during each period (Week 12 for Period II and Week 20 for Period III)

InterventionPercentage Change (Least Squares Mean)
MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg-44.6
MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg-46.9
MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg-48.9
MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg-50.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Clinical Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A clinical AE was an AE reported as a result of a clinical examination or reported by the participant. (NCT00479882)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg67.5
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg68.9
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg35.6
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg37.5
Sequence 3: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg67.5
Sequence 4: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg67.4
Sequence 3: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg32.3
Sequence 4: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg35.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Laboratory AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A laboratory AE was an AE reported as a result of a laboratory assessment or test (NCT00479882)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg3.9
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg4.2
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg5.9
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg3.6
Sequence 3: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg6.2
Sequence 4: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg4.6
Sequence 3: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg5.9
Sequence 4: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg3.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Clinical AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A clinical AE was an AE reported as a result of a clinical examination or reported by the participant. Participants who were discontinued from the study due to a clinical AE were recorded. (NCT00479882)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg15.9
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg15.9
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg1.9
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg2.7
Sequence 3: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg16.4
Sequence 4: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg14.4
Sequence 3: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg2.5
Sequence 4: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg1.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Laboratory AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A laboratory AE was an AE reported as a result of a laboratory assessment or test. Participants who were discontinued from the study due to a laboratory AE were recorded. (NCT00479882)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg0.0
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg0.7
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg0.6
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg0.2
Sequence 3: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg0.7
Sequence 4: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg0.8
Sequence 3: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg0.5
Sequence 4: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg0.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Adjudicated Cardiovascular Event

Select serious adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality that occurred during the treatment phase of the study were adjudicated by an expert committee external to the sponsor. Those events confirmed by the committee as cardiovascular events were recorded (NCT00479882)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg0.0
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg0.0
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg0.2
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg0.0
Sequence 3: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg0.2
Sequence 4: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg0.0
Sequence 3: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg0.2
Sequence 4: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms

Participants had CK levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had an assessment of CK that was 10 x ULN or greater and had associated muscle symptoms present within +/- 7 days were recorded. The ULNs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively. (NCT00479882)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg0.0
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg0.0
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg0.0
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg0.0
Sequence 3: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg0.0
Sequence 4: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg0.0
Sequence 3: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg0.0
Sequence 4: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Impaired Fasting Blood Glucose

Participants had fasting glucose levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had the new diagnosis of impaired fasting blood glucose were recorded. A pre-defined set of MedDRA terms was used to identify participants whose glycemic status became 'impaired' during the course of treatment (from clinical adverse experience reports). The MedDRA terms were as follows: blood glucose increased, blood glucose abnormal, glucose tolerance decreased, glucose tolerance test abnormal, carbohydrate tolerance decreased, glucose tolerance impaired, hyperglycaemia, impaired fasting glucose, impaired insulin secretion, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, insulin resistance syndrome. (NCT00479882)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg0.0
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg0.2
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg0.0
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg0.0
Sequence 3: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg0.0
Sequence 4: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg0.0
Sequence 3: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg0.0
Sequence 4: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Worsening of the Pre-existing Conditions of Diabetes in Participants With Diabetes at Baseline

Participants with diabetes at baseline and who experienced a worsening of the diabetes identified through adverse event reports using a pre-defined set of terms and/or increasing dose/adding a new anti-diabetic medication. (NCT00479882)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Period I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg1.8
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg15.7
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 20mg4.4
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 1.8g/20mg8.3
Sequence 3: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg3.8
Sequence 4: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg8.3
Sequence 3: MK-0524A 2g+Simvastatin 40mg8.3
Sequence 4: MK-0524B 1.8g/40mg11.6

[back to top]

High Density Lipoprotein

(NCT00481351)
Timeframe: 12 week

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
group1 Ezetimibe51.31
Group 2 Simvastatin44.33

[back to top]

Alanine Aminotransferase

(NCT00481351)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
group1 Ezetimibe30.46
Group 2 Simvastatin18.33

[back to top]

CPK

(NCT00481351)
Timeframe: 12 week

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
group1 Ezetimibe169
Group 2 Simvastatin131

[back to top]

Low Density Lipoprotein

(NCT00481351)
Timeframe: 12week

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
group1 Ezetimibe74.85
Group 2 Simvastatin71.92

[back to top]

Total Cholesterol

(NCT00481351)
Timeframe: 12 week

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
group1 Ezetimibe152.61
Group 2 Simvastatin148.29

[back to top]

Change in Inflammatory Markers

Change noted in serum high-sensitivity c-reactive protein (NCT00486044)
Timeframe: baseline and 9 months

Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Simvastatin-1.16
Placebo-0.31

[back to top]

Changes in Cognitive Performance

"Change in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Delayed Recall~The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Delayed Recall score is the raw number of words recalled at Trial 4, adjusted for years of education and age. This is a 12-item word list test." (NCT00486044)
Timeframe: Baseline and 9 months

Interventionadjusted words recalled (Mean)
Simvastatin0.40
Placebo0.26

[back to top]

Changes in Regional Cerebral Blood Flow on MRI

Mean changes noted in posterior cingulate cortex (NCT00486044)
Timeframe: baseline and 9 months

InterventionmL/100 g/min (Mean)
Simvastatin4.09
Placebo-5.08

[back to top]

Change in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Beta-amyloid-42

(NCT00486044)
Timeframe: baseline and 9 months

Interventionng/L (Mean)
Simvastatin-5.2
Placebo-3.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Reporting Adverse Events During Combination Therapy in the Preceding Double-Blind Studies or in the Preceding Open-Label Year 1 Study or in This Open-Label Year 2 Study

All serious and non-serious adverse events are reported from the time of combination study drug initiation until 30 days after discontinuation of study drug. Adverse events are unfavorable changes in health that occur in subjects during a clinical trial or within a specified period following a trial. Serious adverse events are those that result in death, require inpatient hospitalization or the prolongation of hospitalization, result in congenital anomaly/birth defect, or significant disability/incapacity or are life-threatening. (NCT00491530)
Timeframe: Anytime after initiation of combination therapy (in the preceding 12-week double-blind studies or in the preceding open-label year 1 study) up to 116 weeks, to within 30 days after the last dose of combination therapy.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin94.8
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin90.0
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin97.7

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 104 of This Open-Label Year 2 Study

[(Week 104 HDL-C minus baseline HDL-C)/baseline HDL-C] X 100. Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of combination therapy. (NCT00491530)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 104 (may include weeks in preceding double-blind studies [combination treatment arms], plus 52 weeks in preceding open-label year 1 study, and open-label year 2 study, up to 104 weeks)

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin13.7
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin11.2
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin5.2

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 104 of This Open-Label Year 2 Study

[(Week 104 Non-HDL-C minus baseline Non-HDL-C)/baseline Non-HDL-C] X 100. Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of combination therapy. (NCT00491530)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 104 (may include weeks in preceding double-blind studies [combination treatment arms], plus 52 weeks in preceding open-label year 1 study, and open-label year 2 study, up to 104 weeks)

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin-26.9
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-23.8
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin-25.1

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) From Baseline to Week 104 of This Open-Label Year 2 Study

[(Week 104 Total-C minus baseline Total-C)/baseline Total-C] X 100. Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of combination therapy. (NCT00491530)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 104 (may include weeks in preceding double-blind studies [combination treatment arms], plus 52 weeks in preceding open-label year 1 study, and open-label year 2 study, up to 104 weeks)

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin-20.1
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-17.9
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin-20.4

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Direct Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 104 of This Open-Label Year 2 Study

[(Week 104 LDL-C minus baseline LDL-C)/baseline LDL-C] X 100. Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of combination therapy. (NCT00491530)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 104 (may include weeks in preceding double-blind studies [combination treatment arms], plus 52 weeks in preceding open-label year 1 study, and open-label year 2 study, up to 104 weeks)

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin-19.2
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-20.2
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin-20.5

[back to top]

Median Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 104 of This Open-Label Year 2 Study

[(Week 104 triglycerides minus baseline triglycerides)/baseline triglycerides] X 100. Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of combination therapy. (NCT00491530)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 104 (may include weeks in preceding double-blind studies [combination treatment arms], plus 52 weeks in preceding open-label year 1 study, and open-label year 2 study, up to 104 weeks)

Interventionpercent change (Median)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin-36.9
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-29.6
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin-38.7

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in Very Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) From Baseline to Week 104 of This Open-Label Year 2 Study

[(Week 104 VLDL-C minus baseline VLDL-C)/baseline VLDL-C] X 100. Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of combination therapy. (NCT00491530)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 104 (may include weeks in preceding double-blind studies [combination treatment arms], plus 52 weeks in preceding open-label year 1 study, and open-label year 2 study, up to 104 weeks)

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ABT-335 + 20 mg Rosuvastatin-33.7
ABT-335 + 40 mg Simvastatin-18.7
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin-26.6

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline After 8 Weeks.

(NCT00496730)
Timeframe: Baseline and 8 Weeks

InterventionPercent of Baseline Value (Mean)
Vytorin-49.29
Atorvastatin-38.05

[back to top]

Change in Lower Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline After 8 Weeks.

(NCT00496730)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Vytorin83.52
Atorvastatin98.27

[back to top]

Number of Patients Attaining LDL-C Goal After 8 Weeks Treatment.

"Number of Patients Attaining LDL-C Goal After 8 Weeks Treatment.~LDL-C goal is based on National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) III guideline (LDL-C goals and cutpoints for therapeutic life changes and drug Therapy in different risk)." (NCT00496730)
Timeframe: Baseline and 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants attaining LDL-C goal (Number)
Vytorin105
Atorvastatin93

[back to top]

Change in Plasma NOx Levels

Measurements of the levels of plasma nitric oxide metabolites (NOx), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), tissue factor (TF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)were performed before and after simvastatin treatment. Changes in mean plasma biomarker levels were assessed for each dose level; however, dose level 3 results were not analyzed, as only 2 subjects were enrolled in this dose group. (NCT00508027)
Timeframe: Baseline, 21 days

Interventionmicromolar (Mean)
Simvastatin, Dose Level 17
Simvastatin, Dose Level 219.7

[back to top]

Change in Plasma IL-6 Levels

Change in plasma IL-6 level after treatment with simvastatin (NCT00508027)
Timeframe: Baseline, 21 days

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Simvastatin, Dose Level 1-0.6
Simvastatin, Dose Level 2-0.3

[back to top]

Change in Plasma Hs-CRP Levels

Change in plasma high sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in subjects treated with simvastatin (NCT00508027)
Timeframe: Baseline, 21 days

Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Simvastatin, Dose Level 1-7.7
Simvastatin, Dose Level 2-3.6

[back to top]

Change in Hemoglobin Level

Change in plasma hemoglobin (Hb) level after treatment with simvastatin (NCT00508027)
Timeframe: Baseline, 21 days

Interventiongm/dL (Mean)
Simvastatin, Dose Level 1-0.2
Simvastatin, Dose Level 20.1
Simvastatin, Dose Level 3-0.4

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol Level

Change in serum total cholesterol level after treatment with simvastatin (NCT00508027)
Timeframe: Baseline, 21 days

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Simvastatin, Dose Level 1-16
Simvastatin, Dose Level 2-18
Simvastatin, Dose Level 3-18

[back to top]

Change in Serum Creatinine Levels

Change in serum creatinine (Cr) levels after treatment with simvastatin (NCT00508027)
Timeframe: Baseline, 21 days

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Simvastatin, Dose Level 10.03
Simvastatin, Dose Level 20.04
Simvastatin, Dose Level 3-0.1

[back to top]

Change in Serum Creatine Kinase Levels

Change in serum creatine kinase (CK) levels after treatment with simvastatin (NCT00508027)
Timeframe: Baseline, 21 days

InterventionU/L (Mean)
Simvastatin, Dose Level 157
Simvastatin, Dose Level 220
Simvastatin, Dose Level 362

[back to top]

Change in Serum Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Levels

Change in serum alanine transaminase (ALT) after treatment with simvastatin (NCT00508027)
Timeframe: Baseline, 21 days

InterventionU/L (Mean)
Simvastatin, Dose Level 14
Simvastatin, Dose Level 23
Simvastatin, Dose Level 3-3

[back to top]

Change in Plasma VEGF Levels

Change in plasma vascular endothelial adhesion molecule-1 levels after treatment with simvastatin (NCT00508027)
Timeframe: Baseline, 21 days

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Dose Level 1-164
Dose Level 2-30

[back to top]

Change in Plasma VCAM1 Levels

Change in plasma vascular cellular adhesion molecule-1 levels after treatment with simvastatin (NCT00508027)
Timeframe: Baseline, 21 days

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Simvastatin, Dose Level 1-44
Simvastatin, Dose Level 2-86

[back to top]

Change in Plasma TF Levels

Change in plasma tissue factor (TF) levels after treatment with simvastatin (NCT00508027)
Timeframe: Baseline, 21 days

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Simvastatin, Dose Level 1-9
Simvastatin, Dose Level 2-36

[back to top]

Percent Change in ApoB/ApoA-1 After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment

Percent change in ApoB/ApoA-1 = (Combination treatment value - Baseline value)/Baseline value*100 (NCT00525824)
Timeframe: Mean of Weeks 4 and 6 on combination therapy (Last observation carried forward)

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
R10 to R10 + E10-47.3900
R20 to R20 + E10-50.2400
S40 to S40 + E10-42.5400
S80 to S80 + E10-44.7600

[back to top]

Percent Change in LDL-C After 6 Weeks Monotherapy

Percent change in LDL-C = (Monotherapy treatment value - Baseline value)/Baseline value*100 (NCT00525824)
Timeframe: Mean of Weeks 4 and 6 on monotherapy (Last observation carried forward)

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
R10 to R10 + E10-46.4900
R20 to R20 + E10-53.5900
S40 to S40 + E10-40.8600
S80 to S80 + E10-46.3500

[back to top]

Percent Change in Triglycerides (TG) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment

Percent change in TG = (Combination treatment value - Baseline value)/Baseline value*100 (NCT00525824)
Timeframe: Mean of Weeks 4 and 6 on combination therapy (Last observation carried forward)

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
R10 to R10 + E10-28.8500
R20 to R20 + E10-35.0000
S40 to S40 + E10-22.9500
S80 to S80 + E10-25.8200

[back to top]

Percent Change in Total Cholesterol (TC) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment

Percent change in TC = (Combination treatment value - Baseline value)/Baseline value*100 (NCT00525824)
Timeframe: Mean of Weeks 4 and 6 on combination therapy (Last observation carried forward)

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
R10 to R10 + E10-43.0000
R20 to R20 + E10-46.6300
S40 to S40 + E10-39.5600
S80 to S80 + E10-41.7100

[back to top]

Percent Change in TC/HDL-C After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment

Percent change in TC/HDL-C = (Combination treatment value - Baseline value)/Baseline value*100 (NCT00525824)
Timeframe: Mean of Weeks 4 and 6 on combination therapy (Last observation carried forward)

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
R10 to R10 + E10-45.5200
R20 to R20 + E10-49.4600
S40 to S40 + E10-41.2700
S80 to S80 + E10-43.4500

[back to top]

Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (nonHDL-C) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment

Percent change in nonHDL-C = (Combination treatment value - Baseline value)/Baseline value*100 (NCT00525824)
Timeframe: Mean of Weeks 4 and 6 on combination therapy (Last observation carried forward)

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
R10 to R10 + E10-54.6500
R20 to R20 + E10-58.9100
S40 to S40 + E10-49.9300
S80 to S80 + E10-52.3700

[back to top]

Percent Change in Non-HDL-C/HDL-C After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment

Percent change in non-HDL-C/HDL-C = (Combination treatment value - Baseline value)/Baseline value*100 (NCT00525824)
Timeframe: Mean of Weeks 4 and 6 on combination therapy (Last observation carried forward)

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
R10 to R10 + E10-56.4200
R20 to R20 + E10-60.8900
S40 to S40 + E10-51.1100
S80 to S80 + E10-53.5100

[back to top]

Percent Change in LDL-C/HDL-C After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment

Percent change in LDL-C/HDL-C = (Combination treatment value - Baseline value)/Baseline value*100 (NCT00525824)
Timeframe: Mean of Weeks 4 and 6 on combination therapy (Last observation carried forward)

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
R10 to R10 + E10-61.4700
R20 to R20 + E10-65.2500
S40 to S40 + E10-57.1300
S80 to S80 + E10-58.6600

[back to top]

Percent Change in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment

Percent change in hs-CRP = (Combination treatment value - Baseline value)/Baseline value*100 (NCT00525824)
Timeframe: Mean of Weeks 4 and 6 on combination therapy (Last observation carried forward)

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
R10 to R10 + E10107.1200
R20 to R20 + E10-9.5300
S40 to S40 + E1015.0300
S80 to S80 + E100.4200

[back to top]

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA-1) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment

Percent change in ApoA-1 = (Combination treatment value - Baseline value)/Baseline value*100 (NCT00525824)
Timeframe: Mean of Weeks 4 and 6 on combination therapy (Last observation carried forward)

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
R10 to R10 + E103.8100
R20 to R20 + E102.6800
S40 to S40 + E101.4900
S80 to S80 + E102.1300

[back to top]

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment

Percent change in ApoB = (Combination treatment value - Baseline value)/Baseline value*100 (NCT00525824)
Timeframe: Mean of Weeks 4 and 6 on combination therapy (Last observation carried forward)

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
R10 to R10 + E10-46.1100
R20 to R20 + E10-49.5000
S40 to S40 + E10-41.9500
S80 to S80 + E10-44.1700

[back to top]

Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment

Percent change in HDL-C = (Combination treatment value - Baseline value)/Baseline value*100 (NCT00525824)
Timeframe: Mean of Weeks 4 and 6 on combination therapy (Last observation carried forward)

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
R10 to R10 + E106.4100
R20 to R20 + E107.4600
S40 to S40 + E103.9200
S80 to S80 + E104.3400

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) After 6 Weeks Combination Treatment

Percent change in LDL-C = (Combination treatment value - Baseline value)/Baseline value*100 (NCT00525824)
Timeframe: Mean of Weeks 4 and 6 on combination therapy (Last observation carried forward)

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
R10 to R10 + E10-59.7200
R20 to R20 + E10-63.4800
S40 to S40 + E10-55.2200
S80 to S80 + E10-57.4200

[back to top]

Time to Clinical Stability

Normalization of vital signs for each subject enrolled. This is expressed as a mean time to normalization for each +/- standard error. (NCT00528580)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventiondays (Mean)
Treatment Group3
Control Group3

[back to top]

Neutrophil Delivery to the Oral Mucosa Using a Non-invasive Mouthwash Technique

Oral mucosal polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) are obtained and assessed using a modification of the mouthwash method of (Wright et.al. Blood 1986;67:1023-30). For each subject, PMN counts are assessed on days 1, 2, 3 [Baseline (B)]; days 8, 9, 10 [Treatment (T)]; and days 11, 13, 15 [Recovery (R)]. The PMN counts for each subject are averaged for each study time period (B, T or R) within each study arm (Pioglitazone, Simvastatin and Ibuprofen). The mean baseline (B) PMN counts are compared to the mean treatment (T) PMN counts for each study arm, with the results expressed as the percent change in PMN counts . Paired T-tests between baseline and treatment PMN counts are used to analyze for significance. The recovery period is used to verify that the PMN counts return to baseline following the treatment period. Data from the recovery period is not shown. (NCT00531882)
Timeframe: 3X Before treatment (Days 1,2,3) 3X During treatment (Days 8,9,10)

Intervention% change in mean PMN counts: B vs T (Number)
1-Pioglitazone6.4
2-Simvastatin-19.6
3-Ibuprofen 1000-1600 mg Twice Daily (Max 3200 mg/Day)-28.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL-C) at Week 12

(NCT00535405)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

InterventionPercent change in LDL-C (Least Squares Mean)
Atorvastatin 10 mg-39.5
Ezetimibe 10 mg/Simvastatin 20 mg-54.2
Atorvastatin 20 mg-46.6
Ezetimibe 10 mg/Simvastatin 40 mg-59.1
Atorva 40 mg-50.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Achieved LDL-C <100 mg/dL at Week 12

(NCT00535405)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

InterventionPercent of Patients (Mean)
Atorvastatin 10 mg58.7
Ezetimibe 10 mg/Simvastatin 20 mg83.6
Atorvastatin 20 mg76.9
Ezetimibe 10 mg/Simvastatin 40 mg90.3
Atorva 40 mg79.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Achieved LDL-C <70 mg/dL at Week 12

(NCT00535405)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionPercent of Patients (Mean)
Atorvastatin 10 mg9.9
Ezetimibe 10 mg/Simvastatin 20 mg51.3
Atorvastatin 20 mg26.1
Ezetimibe 10 mg/Simvastatin 40 mg68.2
Atorva 40 mg38.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With AVD Who Achieved LDL-C <70 mg/dL at Week 12

Patients with AVD Who Achieved LDL-C <70 mg/dL. AVD was defined as a history of myocardial infarction, stable angina, coronary artery procedures or evidence of clinically significant myocardial ischemia. (NCT00535405)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

InterventionPercent of Patients (Mean)
Atorvastatin 10 mg10.0
Ezetimibe 10 mg/Simvastatin 20 mg44.4
Atorvastatin 20 mg31.6
Ezetimibe 10 mg/Simvastatin 40 mg65.8
Atorva 40 mg44.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With High Risk for CHD Who Achieved LDL-C <70 mg/dL at Week 12

Risk was assessed utilizing a history of established CHD or CHD risk equivalent and Framingham Risk scoring. (NCT00535405)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

InterventionPercent of Patients (Mean)
Atorvastatin 10 mg10.9
Ezetimibe 10 mg/Simvastatin 20 mg54.3
Atorvastatin 20 mg28.9
Ezetimibe 10 mg/Simvastatin 40 mg69.2
Atorva 40 mg38.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Without Atherosclerosis Vascular Disease (AVD) Who Achieved LDL-C <100 mg/dL or Patients With AVD Who Achieved LDL-C <70 mg/dL at Week 12

Patients with AVD Who Achieved LDL-C <70 mg/dL. AVD was defined as a history of myocardial infarction, stable angina, coronary artery procedures or evidence of clinically significant myocardial ischemia. (NCT00535405)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

InterventionPercent of Patients (Mean)
Atorvastatin 10 mg45.0
Ezetimibe 10 mg/Simvastatin 20 mg69.0
Atorvastatin 20 mg61.3
Ezetimibe 10 mg/Simvastatin 40 mg82.1
Atorva 40 mg69.9

[back to top]

"Number of Participants Who Achieved of BP, HbA1c and Total, HDL and LDL Cholesterol Goals at the End of Intervention Phase"

Achievement of targets at end of intervention was performed applying generalized estimating equation (GEE) models, further adjusting for baseline values as covariate. (NCT00535925)
Timeframe: 13 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care (SoC) Therapy150
Multifactorial Intensified Therapy191

[back to top]

"Number of Participants With Overall Fatal and Non-fatal, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACEs)"

number of MACEs in the two groups are reported. In addition, The primary endpoint was analyzed with event curves for the time-to-first event based on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox regression model was used to calculate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Due to the cluster randomized study design, a Cox shared-frailty model was fitted. multivariable model was adjusted for selected potential confounders: age, sex, systolic blood pressure (SBP), hemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albuminuria, HbA1c, total cholesterol and triglycerides (log-scaled) to reduce risk of bias. (NCT00535925)
Timeframe: 4 years (in the case the number of events needed by sample size is not reached at the expected 4-year time frame, primary end point will be assessed after the follow-up phase)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Conventional Therapy146
Intensified Therapy116

[back to top]

Development or Progression of Macular Edema

(NCT00542178)
Timeframe: Measured at Year 4

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intensive Glycemia Control44
Standard Glycemia Control40
Intensive Blood Pressure Control18
Standard Blood Pressure Control20
Fenofibrate + Simvastatin Therapy24
Placebo + Simvastatin Therapy22

[back to top]

Loss of Visual Acuity

(NCT00542178)
Timeframe: Measured at Year 4

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intensive Glycemia Control744
Standard Glycemia Control752
Intensive Blood Pressure Control367
Standard Blood Pressure Control382
Fenofibrate + Simvastatin Therapy354
Placebo + Simvastatin Therapy393

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy of at Least 3 Stages on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale, or Development of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Necessitating Photocoagulation Therapy or Vitrectomy

Diabetic retinopathy status was defined according to the eye with the highest level on the ETDRS Final Severity Scale for Persons, as follows: no diabetic retinopathy, a level of less than 20; mild diabetic retinopathy, a level of 20; moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), a level above 20 but less than 53; severe diabetic retinopathy, a level of 53 but less than 60; and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), a level of 60 or higher. (NCT00542178)
Timeframe: Measured at Year 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Intensive Glycemia Control104
Standard Glycemia Control149
Intensive Blood Pressure Control67
Standard Blood Pressure Control54
Fenofibrate + Simvastatin Therapy52
Placebo + Simvastatin Therapy80

[back to top]

Cataract Extraction

(NCT00542178)
Timeframe: Measured at Year 4

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intensive Glycemia Control547
Standard Glycemia Control623
Intensive Blood Pressure Control266
Standard Blood Pressure Control300
Fenofibrate + Simvastatin Therapy305
Placebo + Simvastatin Therapy299

[back to top]

Compare the Effect of Pre-operative Simvastatin Versus Placebo on Prostate Cancer Cell Apoptosis and Its Mediators in Men Undergoing Planned Prostatectomy.

Compare the effect of pre-operative simvastatin versus placebo on prostate cancer cell apoptosis and its mediators in men undergoing planned prostatectomy. Apoptosis was measured by calculating the percent of Ki67 cellular staining. (NCT00572468)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionPercentage of cells (Mean)
Simvastatin7.53333
Placebo6

[back to top]

Measure the Effect of Pre-operative Simvastatin Versus Placebo on the Mevalonate Pathway Synthesis and Target Activation in Benign and Malignant Prostate Tissue.

Measure the effect of pre-operative simvastatin versus placebo on the mevalonate pathway synthesis and target activation in benign and malignant prostate tissue using Androgen Receptor (AR) antibody. AR was measured in tissue obtained at the time of prostatectomy in both benign and malignant tissues. (NCT00572468)
Timeframe: 5 years

InterventionPercentage of cells (Mean)
Simvastatin168.6666667
Placebo182.7272727

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival

Progression-free survival is the defined as the time from study entry to disease progression (PD) or death based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. Patients alibe without PD are censored at the date of last disease evaluation. PD is defined as a greater than 25% increase in serum IgM monoclonal protein levels from the lowest attained response value as determined by serum electrophoresis, confirmed by at least one other investigation, or progression of clinically significant disease related symptom(s). [Consensus panel criteria: Weber et al, 2003; Kimby et al, 2005]. (NCT00575965)
Timeframe: Assessed at month 1 and 3 and thereafter every 3 months while on therapy; Assessed every 6 months for up to 2 years of follow-up. Median follow-up in this study cohort was 6 months (range 2-18 months).

Interventionmonths (Median)
Simvastatin6

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Objective response is defined as achieving partial response or better on therapy based on the Consensus Panel Recommendations from the 2nd and 3rd International Workshop on WM [Weber et al, 2003; Kimby et al, 2005]. Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of serum monoclonal (SM) Immunoglobulin (Ig) E (IgE), measured centrally; resolution of adenopathy/organomegaly upon physical exam and computerized tomography (CT) scan; lymph nodes =<1.5 centimeters; absence of malignant cell by bone marrow histologic examination. Partial Response (PR): a >=50% reduction from baseline in the SM IgM concentration. Minor Response (MR): >=25%, but a <50% reduction of SM IgM from baseline. (NCT00575965)
Timeframe: Assessed at month 1 and 3 and thereafter every 3 months while on therapy. Median duration on treatment was 6 months (range 1-24 months).

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
Simvastatin0.00

[back to top]

6-minute Walk Distance

(NCT00587678)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionft. (Mean)
Simvastatin 40mg1078
Simvastatin 40mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg1038
Ezetimibe 10mg1099

[back to top]

Phosphocreatine Recovery Time Constant - the Time it Takes for Phosphocreatine Levels to Recover to Plateau.

Phosphocreatine recovery time constant is the time it takes for phosphocreatine levels to recover to plateau after the completion of exercise. This ranges from 20 to 1000 seconds. 20-40 seconds is normal and any value over 40 seconds is abnormal. (NCT00587678)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Simvastatin 40mg84
Simvastatin 40mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg73
Ezetimibe 10mg74

[back to top]

Plaque Volume

SFA plaque volume (NCT00587678)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventioncm^3 (Mean)
Simvastatin 40mg10.5
Simvastatin 40mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg10.5
Ezetimibe 10mg10.8

[back to top]

Total Cholesterol

(NCT00587678)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Simvastatin 40mg152
Simvastatin 40mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg136
Ezetimibe 10mg144

[back to top]

Log Treadmill Exercise Time

(NCT00587678)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionlog time in seconds (Mean)
Simvastatin 40mg5.92
Simvastatin 40mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg5.79
Ezetimibe 10mg5.78

[back to top]

Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

(NCT00587678)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Simvastatin 40mg83
Simvastatin 40mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg68
Ezetimibe 10mg77

[back to top]

High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

(NCT00587678)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Simvastatin 40mg44
Simvastatin 40mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg46
Ezetimibe 10mg43

[back to top]

V02 - Maximal Oxygen Consumption

(NCT00587678)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionml/min/kg (Mean)
Simvastatin 40mg14.8
Simvastatin 40mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg12.1
Ezetimibe 10mg12.3

[back to top]

Magnetic Resonance Angiographic Index

MRA index is a measure of angiographic severity of disease. 0 = no disease and 4 is severe disease. (NCT00587678)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionunits on scale (0 = normal, 4 = worst) (Mean)
Simvastatin 40mg0.71
Simvastatin 40mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg1.32
Ezetimibe 10mg0.63

[back to top]

Perfusion Index

Perfusion index is a MRI measure of calf muscle perfusion indexed to the arterial input. The value is between 0 and 1 with 0 being worst and 1 being best. (NCT00587678)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionUnits on a scale (0 = worst, 1 = best) (Mean)
Simvastatin 40mg0.34
Simvastatin 40mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg0.37
Ezetimibe 10mg0.54

[back to top]

Triglycerides

(NCT00587678)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Simvastatin 40mg171
Simvastatin 40mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg119
Ezetimibe 10mg152

[back to top]

Evaluation of Disability (EDSS).

Score (0 to 10), lower score less disability and better progression. For EDSS, mean score at 24 months was compared between treatment groups using an ANCOVA model adjusting for baseline score and minimisation variables. (NCT00647348)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Simvastatin 80mg OD5.93
Placebo6.35

[back to top]

Disease Impact Specific to the Disease and Rated by the Patient (MSIS-29 Questionnaire Total Score)

"The MSIS-29 is a 29-item self-report measure with 20 items associated with a physical scale and 9 items with a psychological scale. Items ask about the impact of MS on day-to-day life in the past two weeks. All items have 5 response options: 1 not at all to 5extremely. Each of the two scales is scored by summing the responses across items, then converting to a 0-100 scale where 100 indicates a greater impact of the disease on daily function (worse health)." (NCT00647348)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Simvastatin 80mg OD70.1
Placebo76.1

[back to top]

Disease Impact Specific to the Disease and Rated by the Patient (MSIS-29 Questionnaire Psychological Score)

"The MSIS-29 is a 29-item self-report measure with 20 items associated with a physical scale and 9 items with a psychological scale. Items ask about the impact of MS on day-to-day life in the past two weeks. All items have 5 response options: 1 not at all to 5extremely. Each of the two scales is scored by summing the responses across items, then converting to a 0-100 scale where 100 indicates a greater impact of the disease on daily function (worse health)." (NCT00647348)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Simvastatin 80mg OD18.3
Placebo19.8

[back to top]

Disease Impact Specific to the Disease and Rated by the Patient (MSIS-29 Questionnaire Physical Score)

"The MSIS-29 is a 29-item self-report measure with 20 items associated with a physical scale and 9 items with a psychological scale. Items ask about the impact of MS on day-to-day life in the past two weeks. All items have 5 response options: 1 not at all to 5extremely. Each of the two scales are scored by summing the responses across items, then converting to a 0-100 scale where 100 indicates greater impact of disease on daily function (worse health)." (NCT00647348)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Simvastatin 80mg OD51.7
Placebo56.3

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Whole Brain Volume

(NCT00647348)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of brain volumen change (Mean)
Simvastatin 80mg OD0.288
Placebo0.584

[back to top]

Evaluation of Disability (MSFC Z Score).

Negative value implies worsening and a positive value implies improvement. (NCT00647348)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Simvastatin 80mg OD-0.78
Placebo-1.21

[back to top]

Evaluation of Disability (MSFC Walk).

The patient is directed to one end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and is instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as possible, but safely. The time is calculated from the initiation of the instruction to start and ends when the patient has reached the 25-foot mark. (NCT00647348)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionfoot per second (Mean)
Simvastatin 80mg OD1.83
Placebo1.55

[back to top]

Evaluation of Disability (MSFC Peg Test).

The patient is seated at a table with a small, shallow container holding nine pegs and a wood or plastic block containing nine empty holes. On a start command when a stopwatch is started, the patient picks up the nine pegs one at a time as quickly as possible, puts them in the nine holes, and, once they are in the holes, removes them again as quickly as possible one at a time, replacing them into the shallow container. The total time to complete the task is recorded. (NCT00647348)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionspeed per second (Mean)
Simvastatin 80mg OD0.033
Placebo0.033

[back to top]

Evaluation of Disability (MSFC PASAT).

The PASAT is a measure of cognitive function that assesses auditory information processing speed and flexibility, as well as calculation ability. Single digits are presented every 3 seconds and the patient must add each new digit to the one immediately prior to it. Shorter inter-stimulus intervals, e.g., 2 seconds or less have also been used with the PASAT but tend to increase the difficulty of the task. Score 0 to 60, higher score less disability. (NCT00647348)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Simvastatin 80mg OD38.3
Placebo35.2

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline at Study Endpoint, After 8 Weeks of Treatment

(NCT00652327)
Timeframe: Assessed at the end of 8 weeks of treatment (from baseline to endpoint)

InterventionPercentage change (Mean)
Ezetimibe + Statin-26.56
Double Statin-9.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Adverse Reactions

"An adverse event is any unfavorable medical event occurring in a subject to whom an investigational product is administered, and a causal relationship between the administered investigational product and an adverse event is not always clarified.~That is, an adverse event is any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal change in laboratory test values), symptom, or disease, and a causal relationship to the relevant investigational product is not considered.~Any adverse event that was treatment-related was considered an adverse reaction." (NCT00653523)
Timeframe: Throughout 1 year of study

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Adverse EventsAdverse Reactions
Ezetimibe + Simvastatin14336

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) Treatment Goal After 6-week Treatment.

Goal attainment percentage of LDL-C after 6-week treatment. LDL-C goal attainment was based on National Cholesterol Education program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines (2004). Newly Diagnosed Dyslipidemia Patients Including: 1)Intermediate Risk (>2 Risk Factors) with Total Cholesterol above 200 mg/dL or Low Density Lipoprotein C (LDL-C) level >130 who failed a 3-month diet control period, or 2) high risk patients with a history of coronary artery disease or diabetes having a total cholesterol >200 mg/dl or LDL-C level >130 mg/dl. (NCT00654628)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 6

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg90.4

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) Treatment Goal After 12-week Treatment.

Goal attainment percentage of LDL-C after 12-week treatment. LDL-C goal attainment was based on National Cholesterol Education program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines (2004). Newly Diagnosed Dyslipidemia Patients Including: 1)Intermediate Risk (>2 Risk Factors) with Total Cholesterol above 200 mg/dL or Low Density Lipoprotein C (LDL-C) level >130 who failed a 3-month diet control period, or 2) high risk patients with a history of coronary artery disease or diabetes having a total cholesterol >200 mg/dl or LDL-C level >130 mg/dl. (NCT00654628)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg87.8

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change of Triglycerides From Baseline at Week 6

(NCT00654628)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 6

InterventionPercent Change (Median)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg-22.2

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Total-Cholesterol (TC) at Week 6

(NCT00654628)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 6

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg-38.1

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Total-Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12

(NCT00654628)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg-39.5

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 6

(NCT00654628)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 6

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg-51.4

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12

(NCT00654628)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg-53.8

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change From Baseline of High Density Lipoprotein-C (HDL-C) at Week 6

(NCT00654628)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 6

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg4.5

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change From Baseline of High Density Lipoprotein-C (HDL-C) at Week 12

(NCT00654628)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg9.4

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 6

(NCT00654628)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 6

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg-82.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12

(NCT00654628)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg-85.6

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change of Triglycerides From Baseline at Week 12

(NCT00654628)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

InterventionPercent Change (Median)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg-24.7

[back to top]

Median Concentration of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF)

Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha is a cell signaling protein (cytokine) involved in systemic inflammation and is one of the cytokines that make up the acute phase reaction. TNF is important to the body because it helps regulate the response of the immune system to a foreign object, especially to the present cancerous tumor. It promotes inflammation, produces other cells used in the inflammatory response, and can help cells heal. The normal range is 5 to 27.2 pg/ml. (NCT00656292)
Timeframe: baseline, at the start of the surgical procedure (0 hrs), 8 hrs, 24 hrs, 48 hrs, 72 hrs

,
Interventionpg/ml (Median)
baselinetime 0 hourstime 8 hourstime 24 hourstime 48 hourstime 72 hours
Placebo0.850.960.861.001.371.36
Simvastatin1.00.950.941.251.571.58

[back to top]

Median Concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a substance produced by the liver in response to inflammation. Normal CRP levels are below 3.0 mg/L. (NCT00656292)
Timeframe: baseline, at the start of the surgical procedure (0 hrs), 8 hrs, 24 hrs, 48 hrs, 72 hrs

,
Interventionmg/L (Median)
baselinetime 0 hourstime 8 hourstime 24 hourstime 48 hourstime 72 hours
Placebo3.03.04.152.5157.8197.2
Simvastatin3.03.03.047.5139.7122.4

[back to top]

Median Concentration of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

Description: AST is an enzyme found in high amounts in liver, heart, and muscle cells. This test is mainly done along with other tests such as alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin to diagnose and monitor liver disease. This test evaluates hepatocyte integrity, as serum levels of this enzyme rise in response to a variety of forms of injury to hepatic cells. The normal range is 10 to 40 U/L. (NCT00656292)
Timeframe: baseline, at the start of the surgical procedure (0 hrs), 8 hrs, 24 hrs, 48 hrs, 72 hrs

,
InterventionU/L (Median)
baselinetime 0 hourstime 8 hourstime 24 hourstime 48 hourstime 72 hours
Placebo24.520.025.030.535.044.0
Simvastatin24.521.029.041.553.056.5

[back to top]

Median Concentration of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)

An enzyme normally present in liver and heart cells that is released into the bloodstream when the liver or heart is damaged. The blood ALT levels are elevated with liver damage (for example, from viral hepatitis) or with an insult to the heart (for example, from a heart attack). The normal range is 7 to 56 U/L. (NCT00656292)
Timeframe: baseline, at the start of the surgical procedure (0 hrs), 8 hrs, 24 hrs, 48 hrs, 72 hrs

,
InterventionU/L (Median)
baselinetime 0 hourstime 8 hourstime 24 hourstime 48 hourstime 72 hours
Placebo22.016.016.517.018.025.0
Simvastatin2316.518.020.523.024.0

[back to top]

Median Concentration of Creatine Kinase (CK)

A creatine kinase test may be used to detect inflammation of muscles or muscle damage due to muscle disorders. A person may have muscle injury with few or nonspecific symptoms, such as weakness, fever, and nausea, that may also be seen with a variety of other conditions. A healthcare practitioner may use a CK test to help detect muscle damage in these cases, especially if someone is taking a drug such as a statin. Normal values at rest are usually between 60 and 174 IU/L. (NCT00656292)
Timeframe: baseline, at the start of the surgical procedure (0 hrs), 8 hrs, 24 hrs, 48 hrs, 72 hrs

,
InterventionU/L (Median)
baselinetime 0 hourstime 8 hourstime 24 hourstime 48 hourstime 72 hours
Placebo111.0103.0257.0647.0685.0886.0
Simvastatin89.571.0527.01345.0973.0597.0

[back to top]

Median Concentration of Interleukin-6 (IL-6)

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) may be used to help evaluate a person who has a condition associated with inflammation, such as lupus or rheumatoid arthritis, or with infection, such as sepsis. It may also be used in the evaluation of diabetes or cardiovascular disease. IL-6 is a cytokine, a protein produced by immune cells that acts on other cells to help regulate and/or promote an immune response. It also stimulates the production of acute phase reactants, proteins that increase in the blood with conditions that cause inflammation or tissue injury. Circulating IL-6 can be found in the blood of normal individuals in the 1 pg/mL range, with slight elevations during the menstrual cycle, modest elevations in certain cancers (melanoma) (10 pg/mL), and large elevations after surgery (30-430 pg/mL). (NCT00656292)
Timeframe: baseline, at the start of the surgical procedure (0 hrs), 8 hrs, 24 hrs, 48 hrs, 72 hrs

,
Interventionng/ml (Median)
baselinetime 0 hourstime 8 hourstime 24 hourstime 48 hourstime 72 hours
Placebo2.41.856.770.287.045.2
Simvastatin1.51.250.064.289.237.7

[back to top]

Inflammatory Marker Levels

Change in inflammatory marker levels over time from time zero to time 24 hour. (NCT00676897)
Timeframe: over 24 hours (time zero and time 24 hours)

,
Interventionpg/mL and ng/mL (Mean)
VEGF (pg/mL)IL-6 (pg/mL)TNF-alpha (pg/mL)ICAM (ng/mL)VCAM (ng/mL)eSelectin (ng/mL)
Placebo Group269-423-2.17-0.1019011
Statin Group-98-370-0.52148127998

[back to top]

Time to Shock Reversal

(NCT00676897)
Timeframe: up to 7 days

Interventionhours (Mean)
Statin Group44.4
Placebo Group28.6

[back to top]

Perihematomal Edema

Solitary patient lost to follow up (out of state) (NCT00718328)
Timeframe: Days 7 and 14

InterventionRelative perihematomal edema (Mean)
Simvastatin GroupNA

[back to top]

Total Cholesterol

(NCT00762164)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Intervention% change in total cholesterol (Mean)
1Vytorin 10/80 Divided Into 4-34.2
Simvastatin-19.9

[back to top]

LDL Cholesterol

(NCT00762164)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Intervention% change in LDL cholesterol (Mean)
1Vytorin 10/80 Divided Into 4-44.7
Simvastatin-27.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reaching LDL-C Target Goals of <70 mg/dL

Target LDL-C level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at study endpoint after 6 weeks of treatment for the Full Analysis Set (FAS) population. (NCT00782184)
Timeframe: Treatment Week 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/4034
Atorvastatin 40 mg6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reaching LDL-C Target Goal <100 mg/dL

Target LDL-C level of < 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at study endpoint after 6 weeks of treatment for the Full Analysis Set (FAS) population. (NCT00782184)
Timeframe: Treatment Week 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/4081
Atorvastatin 40 mg52

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reaching LDL-C Target Goal <77 mg/dL

Target LDL-C level of < 77 mg/dL (2.00 mmol/L) at study endpoint after 6 weeks of treatment for the Full Analysis Set (FAS) population. (NCT00782184)
Timeframe: Treatment Week 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/4045
Atorvastatin 40 mg11

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides

(NCT00782184)
Timeframe: Baseline (Treatment Day 1), Treatment Week 6

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40-5.41
Atorvastatin 40 mg-7.54

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol/HDL-Cholesterol Ratio

(NCT00782184)
Timeframe: Baseline (Treatment Day 1), Treatment Week 6

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40-18.63
Atorvastatin 40 mg-8.60

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol

(NCT00782184)
Timeframe: Baseline (Treatment Day 1), Treatment Week 6

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40-15.97
Atorvastatin 40 mg-7.73

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL Cholesterol/HDL-Cholesterol Ratio

(NCT00782184)
Timeframe: Baseline (Treatment Day 1), Treatment Week 6

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40-24.41
Atorvastatin 40 mg-11.20

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL Cholesterol

(NCT00782184)
Timeframe: Baseline (Treatment Day 1), Treatment Week 6

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40-22.50
Atorvastatin 40 mg-10.88

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL)-C

(NCT00782184)
Timeframe: Baseline (Treatment Day 1), Treatment Week 6

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40-26.81
Atorvastatin 40 mg-11.81

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-Cholesterol/HDL-Cholesterol Ratio

(NCT00782184)
Timeframe: Baseline (Treatment Day 1), Treatment Week 6

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40-28.77
Atorvastatin 40 mg-12.66

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)

(NCT00782184)
Timeframe: Baseline (Treatment Day 1), Treatment Week 6

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40-6.18
Atorvastatin 40 mg-8.86

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol

(NCT00782184)
Timeframe: Baseline (Treatment Day 1), Treatment Week 6

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/405.37
Atorvastatin 40 mg2.89

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/A-1 Ratio

(NCT00782184)
Timeframe: Baseline (Treatment Day 1), Treatment Week 6

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40-18.59
Atorvastatin 40 mg-5.67

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B

(NCT00782184)
Timeframe: Baseline (Treatment Day 1), Treatment Week 6

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40-17.23
Atorvastatin 40 mg-9.53

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1

(NCT00782184)
Timeframe: Baseline (Treatment Day 1), Treatment Week 6

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/402.56
Atorvastatin 40 mg-2.69

[back to top]

Resting Cerebral Blood Flow During Peak Period of Vasospasm Risk

Resting cerebral blood flow during peak period of vasospasm risk measured by PET (NCT00795288)
Timeframe: 7-10 days after hemorrhage

InterventionmL/100 g/min (Mean)
Simvastatin.34
Control.30

[back to top]

Cerebral Autoregulation During Peak Period of Vasospasm Risk

Fraction of patients with impaired static autoregulation (% change in MAP/% change in CVR) * 100 A value of <60 is considered abnormal. (NCT00795288)
Timeframe: 7-10 days after hemorrhage

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Simvastatin2
Control2

[back to top]

Impact of Statin on Oxygen Extraction Fraction and Cerebral Metabolism During Peak Period of Vasospasm Risk

Oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) is the ratio of Oxygen delivery (ml/100 g/min) and oxygen utilization (ml/100 g/min). It describes the fraction of the oxygen that reaches the brain that it actually uses for energy production. (NCT00795288)
Timeframe: 7-10 days after hemorrhage

Interventionratio (Mean)
Simvastatin, 80 mg/Day.34
Placebo.3

[back to top]

Feasibility of Randomizing a Cohort of Participants Meeting the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria of the Study

Goal was to randomize 60 participants who met eligibility criteria. (NCT00802100)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Overall Study21

[back to top]

Antipsychotic Efficacy, Defined as Completion of the Trial Without Psychiatric Hospitalization, Clinician Decision to Discontinue Treatment, or Patient Decision to Discontinue Treatment

(NCT00802100)
Timeframe: Measured over 28 weeks of study visits

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
InefficacyUnacceptable side effectsPatient refusalDrop-out, no information availableAdministrativeCompleted trial without discontinuing
Aripiprazole100032
Olanzapine003210
Perphenazine100152

[back to top]

Composite Score of Plaque Inflammation/Stability Gene Expression as Assayed by Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Taqman Analysis

"Excised carotid plaques were evaluated for the gene expression of 60 biomarkers associated with inflammation (Hot biomarkers) & 25 biomarkers associated with stability (Cold biomarkers). Each biomarker was assayed using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction method and results were reported as a Cycle Threshold, (Ct). A Composite Score was calculated by averaging the Ct for each of the 25 cold genes, and subtracting the average Ct for the 60 hot genes. A higher composite score was associated with greater inflammation and a lower score was associated with stability (non-inflamed)." (NCT00804843)
Timeframe: At time of carotid endarterectomy (after 4 to 12 weeks of dosing)

InterventionCycle threshold (Ct) (Mean)
Statin 80 mg + Niacin Extended-release (ER)1.36
Statin 10 mg0.82

[back to top]

Plaque Instability Protein Composite Score

Each excised plaque was analyzed using an assay of 20 proteins that reflect plaque composition and inflammation. Each protein was assigned scaled signs, with a lower (negative) sign associated with plaque stability and a higher (positive) sign associated with plaque inflammation/instability. The Composite Score was the average amounts of all the 20 proteins with their associated signs. A higher Composite Score is associated with more plaque instability. (NCT00804843)
Timeframe: At time of carotid endarterectomy (after 4 to 12 weeks of dosing)

InterventionScore (Mean)
Statin 80 mg + Niacin Extended-release (ER)-7.19
Statin 10 mg-10.48

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to the Final Visit (Full Analysis Set)

The ABT-143 capsules 20/135 milligram, ABT-143 capsules 10/135 milligram, and ABT-143 capsules 5/135 milligram groups were compared to the simvastatin capsules 40 milligram group for mean percent change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol from Baseline to the Final Visit for the full analysis set. (NCT00812955)
Timeframe: Baseline to 8 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Simvastatin Capsules 40 mg9.6
ABT-143 Capsules 5/135 mg16.2
ABT-143 Capsules 10/135 mg14.0
ABT-143 Capsules 20/135 mg15.7

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)

"The mean percent change from Baseline to the Final Visit in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, comparing the following two treatment groups:~ABT-143 capsules 20/135 milligrams versus simvastatin capsules 40 milligrams for the full analysis set." (NCT00812955)
Timeframe: Baseline to 8 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Simvastatin Capsules 40 mg-32.8
ABT-143 Capsules 20/135 mg-47.2

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), With ABT-143 Capsules 10/135 Milligrams Versus Simvastatin Capsules 40 Milligrams (Full Analysis Set)

The mean percent change from Baseline to the Final Visit in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, comparing the following treatment groups, ABT-143 capsules 10/135 milligrams versus simvastatin capsules 40 milligrams for the full analysis set. (NCT00812955)
Timeframe: Baseline to 8 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Simvastatin Capsules 40 mg-32.8
ABT-143 Capsules 10/135 mg-46.0

[back to top]

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), With ABT-143 Capsules 5/135 Milligrams Versus Simvastatin Capsules 40 Milligrams (Full Analysis Set)

The mean percent change from Baseline to the Final Visit in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, comparing the following treatment groups, ABT-143 capsules 5/135 milligrams versus simvastatin capsules 40 milligrams for the full analysis set. (NCT00812955)
Timeframe: Baseline to 8 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Simvastatin Capsules 40 mg-32.8
ABT-143 Capsules 5/135 mg-38.9

[back to top]

Median Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to the Final Visit (Full Analysis Set)

The ABT-143 capsules 20/135 milligram, ABT-143 capsules 10/135 milligram, and ABT-143 capsules 5/135 milligram groups were compared to the simvastatin capsules 40 milligram group for median percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to the Final Visit for the full analysis set. (NCT00812955)
Timeframe: Baseline to 8 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Simvastatin Capsules 40 mg-20.8
ABT-143 Capsules 5/135 mg-42.7
ABT-143 Capsules 10/135 mg-44.6
ABT-143 Capsules 20/135 mg-50.0

[back to top]

Treatment Difference in (Postprandial-Fasting) FMD

A comparison of the postprandial minus fasting change in FMD under treatment with simvastatin 80 mg versus simvastatin 10/10 mg (NCT00817843)
Timeframe: After 6 weeks of treatment

Intervention% (change FMD) (Mean)
Simvastatin 80 mg-0.34
Simvastatin 10 mg / Ezetimibe 10 mg-0.43

[back to top]

Biomarkers of Inflammation

(NCT00819403)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
CRPIL-6
Simvastatin3.511.24
Simvastatin/Ezetimibe3.571.33

[back to top]

Ex Vivo Effects of Treatment With Vytorin Versus Zocor for 6 Weeks on Platelet Alpha Thrombin PAR-1 Receptor Expression

Measured using whole blood flow cytometry (NCT00819403)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

,
Interventionng/dl (Mean)
PAR 1/4 antigenPAR 1/4 activity
Simvastatin35.423.6
Simvastatin/Ezetimibe34.522.5

[back to top]

Change in Triglycerides

change in Triglycerides between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Placebo-34.32
Rosiglitazone-42.47

[back to top]

Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure

change in office systolic blood pressure between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Placebo-18.24
Rosiglitazone-16.77

[back to top]

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin

change in glycosylated haemoglobin between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated haemoglobin (Mean)
Placebo0.12
Rosiglitazone-0.22

[back to top]

Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure

change in office diastolic blood pressure between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Placebo-9.59
Rosiglitazone-9.46

[back to top]

Change in Adiponectin

change in Adiponectin between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionμg/ml (Mean)
Placebo-0.24
Rosiglitazone4.15

[back to top]

Change in Body Mass Index

change in body mass index between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionkg/m2 (Mean)
Placebo-0.21
Rosiglitazone0.68

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Blood Glucose

change in fasting blood glucose between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Placebo5.94
Rosiglitazone-4.85

[back to top]

Change in (Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring) Systolic Blood Pressure

change in (ambulatory blood pressure monitoring) systolic blood pressure between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Placebo3.41
Rosiglitazone-1.08

[back to top]

Change in Malondialdehyde

change in Malondialdehyde between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

InterventionnM (Mean)
Placebo-1.27
Rosiglitazone-1.52

[back to top]

Change in Low-density Lipoprotein

change in low-density lipoprotein between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Placebo-38.88
Rosiglitazone-28.77

[back to top]

Change in Insulin

change in Insulin between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

InterventionIU/ml (Mean)
Placebo0.59
Rosiglitazone-3.47

[back to top]

Change in Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance

change in homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

InterventionHOMA units (Mean)
Placebo0.31
Rosiglitazone-2.08

[back to top]

Change in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein

change in high-sensitivity C-reactive between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Placebo0.72
Rosiglitazone-0.61

[back to top]

Change in High-density Lipoprotein

change in high-density lipoprotein between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Placebo0.71
Rosiglitazone2.77

[back to top]

Change in Urinary Isoprostane

change in urinary isoprostane between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Placebo-0.79
Rosiglitazone-1.09

[back to top]

Change in (Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring) Diastolic Blood Pressure

change in (ambulatory blood pressure monitoring) diastolic blood pressure between baseline and 6 month (NCT00831129)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Placebo-0.88
Rosiglitazone-0.69

[back to top]

Individualized Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mean Scores (Physical Component) From Week 0 to Week 8

Scores from the self-administered SF-36 (Physical component) questionnaire were measured at the start (Week 0) of the study and at the end (Week 8) among patients in the placebo- and statin-treated group. Mean scores range from 0 (minimum) - 100 (maximum) with higher mean scores reflecting better outcomes. Measures reported are the means of Week 0 and week 8, measures of dispersion is the range of scores. (NCT00850460)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 0 Mean ScoreWeek 8 Mean Score
Placebo5056
Statins5348

[back to top]

Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life (INQoL) Mean Scores From Week 0 to Week 8

Scores from the self-administered INQoL questionnaire will be compared at the start of the study (Week 0) and at the end (Week 8) between the statin-treated group and the placebo group. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being a better outcome. Measures reported are the means of Week 0 and week 8, measures of dispersion is the range of the results (3 per group). (NCT00850460)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 0 Mean ScoreWeek 8 Mean Score
Placebo6567
Statins7650

[back to top]

Percent Change in Serum LDL-cholesterol Levels From Baseline to Week 16 (LOCF) (ITT1)

Percent Change from Baseline to Week 16 (LOCF) (NCT00858637)
Timeframe: week16 minus week0

InterventionPercent Change of LDL-cholesterol (Mean)
MCI-196 (Active) + Simvastatin (Placebo)/ Comparison Phase-25.67
Simvastatin (Active) + MCI-196 (Placebo)/ Comparion Phase-26.38

[back to top]

Percent Change in Serum LDL-cholesterol Levels From Week 16 to Week 20 (LOCF) (ITT2)

Percent Change from Week 16 to Week 20 (LOCF) (NCT00858637)
Timeframe: week20 minus week16

InterventionPercent Change of LDL-cholesterol (Mean)
MCI-196 (Active) + Simvastin (Placebo)/ Withdrawal Phase4.03
MCI-196 (Placebo) + Simvastin (Placebo)/ Withdrawal Phase42.55
Simvastin (Active) + MCI-196 (Placebo)/ Withdrawal Phase2.76
Simvastin (Placebo) + MCI-196 (Placebo)/ Withdrawal Phase49.84

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin1.47
Doubling Statin Dose1.00
Rosuvastatin1.99

[back to top]

In Participants Treated With Simvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Simvastatin

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-21.59
Doubling Simvastatin Dose-7.98

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-16.77
Doubling Statin Dose-5.32
Rosuvastatin-14.64

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Statin (Simvastatin or Atorvastatin).

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-23.13
Doubling Statin Dose-8.37

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-21.55
Doubling Statin Dose-7.39
Rosuvastatin-18.99

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Switching Treatment to Rosuvastatin

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-23.13
Rosuvastatin-19.32

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-4.42
Doubling Statin Dose-1.64
Rosuvastatin-9.11

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-12.52
Doubling Statin Dose-4.36
Rosuvastatin-10.70

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-13.21
Doubling Statin Dose-4.88
Rosuvastatin-10.58

[back to top]

In Participants Treated With Simvastatin at Baseline, Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Week 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin84
Doubling Simvastatin Dose19

[back to top]

In Participants Treated With Atorvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Atorvastatin

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-24.58
Doubling Atorvastatin Dose-8.85

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-5.51
Doubling Statin Dose-2.63
Rosuvastatin-3.35

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-18.39
Doubling Statin Dose-6.77
Rosuvastatin-15.14

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-14.98
Doubling Statin Dose-6.97
Rosuvastatin-12.03

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B/Apo A-I Ratio

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-13.67
Doubling Statin Dose-4.75
Rosuvastatin-11.14

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I)

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin0.64
Doubling Statin Dose-0.93
Rosuvastatin0.86

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Week 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin171
Doubling Statin Dose43
Rosuvastatin134

[back to top]

In Participants Treated With Atorvastatin at Baseline, Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)

(NCT00862251)
Timeframe: Week 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin87
Doubling Atorvastatin Dose24

[back to top]

Changes in LDL Cholesterol

"Subjects with T1DM or T2DM were assigned to alternating therapy with simvastatin (40 mg) or ezetimibe (10 mg) for 6 weeks in a crossover design.~The data are reported as follows.~Subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus:~Simvastatin: Changes in LDL after 6-week therapy with simvastatin (irrespective of the treatment order) Ezetimibe: Changes in LDL after 6-week therapy with ezetimibe (irrespective of the treatment order)~Subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus:~Simvastatin: Changes in LDL after 6-week therapy with simvastatin (irrespective of the treatment order) Ezetimibe: Changes in LDL after 6-week therapy with ezetimibe (irrespective of the treatment order)" (NCT00879710)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after starting drug therapy

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
simvastatinezetimibe
Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus,-0.83-0.93
Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus-1.47-0.32

[back to top]

Median Percent Change of Lipid Measurements From LOV111858 End-of-Treatment Week 8 to LOV111818 Months 4, 12, and 24 of the Open-Label Extension Trial

Median percent change from LOV111858 End-of-Treatment (Week 8) to LOV111818 Months 4, 12, and 24 visits of the open-label extension trial (NCT00903409)
Timeframe: LOV111858 End-of-Treatment (Week 8) to LOV111818 Months 4, 12, and 24 of the open-label extension trial

,,
InterventionPercentage change (Median)
Non-HDL-C, Month 12Non-HDL-C, Month 24TG Month, 4TG Month, 12TG Month, 24Total-C, Month 4Total-C, Month 12Total-C, Month 24Calculated VLDL-C, Month 4Calculated VLDL-C, Month 12Calculated VLDL-C, Month 24LDL-C, Month 4LDL-C, Month 12LDL-C, Month 24HDL-C, Month 4HDL-C, Month 12HDL-C, Month 24Total-C:HDL-C Ratio, Month 4Total-C:HDL-C Ratio, Month 12Total-C:HDL-C Ratio, Month 24
Non-switcher-0.21.61.8-3.2-6.40.6-1.7-1.02.1-4.6-5.80.61.91.9-2.9-3.1-5.41.32.75.7
Switcher-6.4-6.3-25.8-27.0-27.0-7.1-3.4-5.6-23.1-21.3-26.46.310.15.51.7-1.8-4.8-7.5-5.4-1.9
Total Non-switcher and Switcher-1.5-3.8-15.8-17.1-19.5-2.5-2.7-3.0-13.5-13.7-17.53.76.33.8-1.2-2.8-4.9-3.5-0.11.1

[back to top]

"Median Percent Change of Lipid Measurements From LOV111858 End-of-Treatment Week 8 to Months 4, 12, and 24 of the Open-Label Extension Study (LOV111818) in Switchers vs. Non-switchers"

Median percent change from LOV111858 Baseline to LOV111818 Months 4, 12, and 24 visits of the open-label extension trial (NCT00903409)
Timeframe: Months 4, 12, and 24 (LOV111818) of the open-label extension trial

,,
InterventionPercent change (Median)
Non-HDL-C, Month 4Non-HDL-C, Month 12Non-HDL-C, Month 24Triglycerides (TG), Month 4TG, Month 12TG, Month 24Total-Cholesterol (Total-C), Month 4Total-C, Month 12Total-C, Month 24Calculated Very Low Density (VLD)L-C, Month 4Calculated Very Low Density (VLD)L-C, Month 12Calculated Very Low Density (VLD)L-C, Month 24Low Density (LD)L-C, Month 4Low Density (LD)L-C, Month 12Low Density (LD)L-C, Month 24HDL-C, Month 4HDL-C, Month 12HDL-C, Month 24Total-C:HDL-C Ratio, Month 4Total-C:HDL-C Ratio, Month 12Total-C:HDL-C Ratio, Month 24
Non-switcher-5.4-6.6-7.8-26.2-30.4-28.2-4.2-5.4-6.4-24.3-29.8-25.02.45.93.40.80.0-2.9-5.3-3.6-1.9
Switcher-10.3-8.1-9.0-31.5-35.7-35.7-7.7-7.7-6.8-29.3-31.9-33.1-0.46.32.60.0-3.1-5.6-7.9-4.7-3.8
Total Non-switcher and Switcher-8.3-7.3-8.9-29.8-34.6-33.3-6.5-6.5-6.7-27.9-30.7-31.51.76.23.00.0-0.9-4.6-6.9-4.0-3.5

[back to top]

Median Percent Change of Non-HDL-C (High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol) in Switchers vs. Non-Switchers Subjects From LOV111858 End-of-Treatment (Week 8) to Month 4 of Extension Study (LOV111818)

Median percent change from LOV111858 (NCT00903409) End-of-Treatment (double-blind study, Week 8) to the Month 4 visit of LOV111818 (open-label extension trial) (NCT00903409)
Timeframe: Month 4 (LOV111818)

InterventionPercent change (Median)
Non-switcher0.9
Switcher-9.4
Total Non-switcher and Switcher-3.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Had an Adverse Event (AE).

"The objective of this study was to evaluate the overall safety and tolerability of Vytorin (R) Tablet (Ezetimibe+Simvastatin) when used in patients with hypercholesterolemia.~All AEs observed by or volunteered to the investigator during this observational study, regardless of suspected causal relationship, were to have been considered an AE." (NCT00909389)
Timeframe: Throughout study up to Day 29 (Final Visit)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Filipino Patients With Hypercholesterolemia62

[back to top]

Changes in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

(NCT00932620)
Timeframe: 3 months

InterventionLDL-C, mg/dL (Mean)
Simvastatin 40-43
Simvastatin/Ezetimibe 10/10-49

[back to top]

Changes in Small Dense Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (sdLDL-C) Levels

(NCT00932620)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

InterventionsdLDL-C, mg/dL (Mean)
Simvastatin 40 mg-42
Simvastatin 10 mg Plus Ezetimibe 10 mg-46

[back to top]

Serum Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin-like/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) Level

"Two days of standardized, pre-packaged meals were provided prior to the 10-hour fast required before blood collection. To assess how consumption of a meal would affect levels of plasma PCSK9, following each of the fasting blood draws, participants were asked to consume a high fat meal (heavy whipping cream + vanilla ice cream in a 1:4 ratio [dose = 162 g/m^2]) within 20 minutes. For the duration of the test, participants were to remain seated or recumbent until blood samples were drawn 4 h after meal completion.~The mean reported was an adjusted mean (defined in first outcome measure)." (NCT00935259)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,
Interventionnmol (Mean)
FedFasted
Placebo4.695.51
Simvastatin 40 mg6.066.47

[back to top]

Fasting Blood Lipidomic Levels After 2 Weeks of Treatment

"Change in fasting blood cholesterol ester, lysophosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, and triacylglycerol levels compared to placebo.~The mean reported was an adjusted mean." (NCT00935259)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,
Interventionnmol (Mean)
Cholesterol ester lipid 16:00Cholesterol ester lipid 18:3n3Cholesterol ester lipid 20:3n6Cholesterol ester lipid 20:3n9Cholesterol ester lipid 22:5n6Cholesterol ester lipid 22:6n3Lysophosphatidyl-choline lipid 20:4n6Phosphatidyl-choline lipid 18:2n6Phosphatidyl-choline lipid 20:3n6Phosphatidyl-choline lipid 20:4n6Phosphatidyl-choline lipid 22:5n3Phosphatidyl-choline lipid 22:5n6Phosphatidyl-ethanolamine lipid 18:2n6Triacylglycerol 16:00Triacylglycerol 20:3n9
Placebo345.114.423.51.21.114.810.3824.9127.1443.234.312.132.11005.14.9
Simvastatin 40 mg288.910.020.91.31.012.711.1684.8117.4458.030.311.421.8788.34.5

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Delta 5 Desaturase Enzyme Activity Compared to Placebo

Change in fasting delta 5 desaturase enzyme activity compared to placebo. Delta 5 desaturase enzyme activity is defined as the ratios of C20:4n-6 to C20:3n-6 and C20:5n-3 to C20:4n-3. (NCT00935259)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Cholesterol ester c20:4n6 / c20:3n6Cholesterol Ester c20:5n3/c20:4n3
Placebo11.566216.3024
Simvastatin 40 mg12.223417.9161

[back to top]

Blood Linoleic Acid Levels

Change in blood linoleic acid levels for Cholesterol Ester compared to placebo. (NCT00935259)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionnmol (Mean)
Simvastatin 40 mg1184.7
Placebo1504.7

[back to top]

Arachidonic Acid Level After 2 Weeks of Treatment

"Arachidonic acid level (20:4n6) in the cholesterol ester lipid class.~The mean reported was an adjusted mean, which was obtained from running a 2-period crossover model that had fixed treatment and period terms and a random participant term." (NCT00935259)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionnmol (Mean)
Simvastatin 40 mg259.1
Placebo269.6

[back to top]

Changes in CSF Beta-amyloid-40 Levels as Measured by xMAP (Multi-Analyte Profiling) )

"Change in CSF beta-amyloid-40 was defined as the ratio of 18-month levels to baseline levels.~Beta amyloid-40 is a substance found in the brain vessels of individuals with Alzheimer's disease and has more potent cerebrovascular effects on individuals with Alzheimer's disease than any other form of beta amyloid." (NCT00939822)
Timeframe: Baseline and 18 months

Interventionratio (Mean)
Simvastatin1.03
Placebo0.98

[back to top]

Changes in CSF Soluble Alpha Precursor Proteins (sAPP-alpha) and Soluble Beta Precursor Proteins (sAPP-beta) as Measured by Duplex

"Changes in CSF sAPP-alpha and sAPP-beta were defined as the ratio of 18-month levels to baseline levels.~sAPP-alpha and sAPP-beta are components of beta-amyloid that provide information on beta-amyloid breakdown." (NCT00939822)
Timeframe: Baseline and 18 months

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
sAPP-alphasAPP-beta
Placebo1.031.00
Simvastatin0.960.98

[back to top]

Changes in CSF Total Tau (T-tau) and Phosphorylated Tau (P-tau) as Measured by xMAP

"Changes in CSF t-tau and p-tau were defined as the ratio of 18-month levels to baseline levels.~T-tau and p-tau are substances found in the brain that can provide information on nerve cell health in the brain and tangle formation in nerve cells." (NCT00939822)
Timeframe: Baseline and 18 months

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Total tauPhosphorylated tau
Placebo1.011.15
Simvastatin1.011.16

[back to top]

Changes in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Beta-amyloid-42 Levels Compared to Baseline as Measured by xMAP

"Change in CSF beta-amyloid-42 was defined as the ratio of 18-month levels to baseline levels.~Beta-amyloid-42 is a substance found in the plaques in the brain of people with Alzheimer's disease and can be detected in CSF. There is no defined normal range yet for middle-aged adults." (NCT00939822)
Timeframe: Baseline and 18 months

Interventionratio (Mean)
Simvastatin1.01
Placebo0.98

[back to top]

Plasma Area Under the Curve (AUC(0 to 48 Hour)) for Simvastatin

Plasma Area Under the Curve of simvastatin (NCT00943124)
Timeframe: Through 48 Hours Post Dose

Interventionng/mL * Hour (Least Squares Mean)
MK0524B15.03
Simvastatin + MK0524A15.56

[back to top]

Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Simvastatin Acid

Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Simvastatin Acid, the active metabolite of simvastatin (NCT00943124)
Timeframe: 48 Hours Post Dose

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
MK0524B1.016
Simvastatin + MK0524A0.918

[back to top]

Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Simvastatin

(NCT00943124)
Timeframe: 48 Hours Post Dose

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
MK0524B5.81
Simvastatin + MK0524A6.33

[back to top]

Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Nicotinuric Acid

Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Nicotinuric Acid, one of the active metabolites of Niacin (NCT00943124)
Timeframe: 24 Hours Post Dose

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
MK0524B620
Simvastatin + MK0524A807

[back to top]

Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Laropiprant

(NCT00943124)
Timeframe: 48 Hours Post Dose

Interventionnmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
MK0524B1030
Simvastatin + MK0524A953

[back to top]

Plasma Area Under the Curve (AUC(0 to 48hr)) for Simvastatin Acid

Plasma Area Under the Curve of simvastatin acid, the active metabolite of simvastatin (NCT00943124)
Timeframe: Through 48 Hours Post Dose

Interventionng/mL * Hour (Least Squares Mean)
MK0524B9.19
Simvastatin + MK0524A8.03

[back to top]

Total Urinary Excretion of Niacin and Its Metabolites

(NCT00943124)
Timeframe: 96 Hours Post Dose

Interventionµmol (Least Squares Mean)
MK0524B5339
Simvastatin + MK0524A5825

[back to top]

Plasma Area Under the Curve (AUC(0 to Infinity)) for Laropiprant

Plasma Area Under the Curve of Laropiprant (NCT00943124)
Timeframe: 48 Hours Post Dose

Interventionnmol/L * hour (Least Squares Mean)
MK0524B5486
Simvastatin + MK0524A5405

[back to top]

Simvastatin AUC0-∞ (AUC From Time Zero to Infinity)

Simvastatin (Reference) ESL + Simvastatin (Test) (NCT00987558)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 14

Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
Simvastatin (Reference)108
ESL + Simvastatin (Test)54.6

[back to top]

Simvastatin Tmax (Time of Occurrence of Cmax)

Simvastatin (Reference) ESL + Simvastatin (Test) (NCT00987558)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 14

Interventionhours (Mean)
Simvastatin (Reference)1.50
ESL + Simvastatin (Test)1.62

[back to top]

Simvastatin Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration)

Simvastatin (Reference) ESL + Simvastatin (Test) (NCT00987558)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 14

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Simvastatin (Reference)17.7
ESL + Simvastatin (Test)6.89

[back to top]

Simvastatin AUC0-t

"AUC0-t - area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero to the last sampling time at which concentrations were at or above the limit of quantification~Simvastatin (Reference) ESL + Simvastatin (Test)" (NCT00987558)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 14

Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
Simvastatin (Reference)93.9
ESL + Simvastatin (Test)43.3

[back to top]

L5 Concentration in Metabolic Syndrome Patients

Patient's blood samples were collected before treatment. L5 were purified by ultracentrifugation then FPLC. Quantification analysis will indicate the L5 concentration (mg/dL) per group. (NCT00988364)
Timeframe: 0 months, at the start

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Ezetimibe35.97
Simvastatin17.8233
Vytorin29.736
Placebo23.1

[back to top]

L5 Concentration After Treatment of Ezetimibe, Simvastatin, or Vytorin in Metabolic Syndrome Patients

Patient's blood samples were collected at the corresponding time point for L5 purification. L5 quantification and characterization were investigated with chemical analysis, proteomics and in-vitro cell signaling analysis. Final data analysis will determine total L5 concentration (mg/dL). (NCT00988364)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Ezetimibe30.17
Simvastatin19.19
Vytorin14.17
Placebo15.15

[back to top]

Forearm Blood Flow

endothelial (forearm blood flow) responses to acetylcholine stimulation at baseline, and under conditions of high glucose before and after ischemia/reperfusion injury, and same with the addition of an intervention: sevoflurane (Arm 1), vitamin C (Arm 2), and high statin (Arm 3). (NCT00995670)
Timeframe: Baseline, Glucose Control, 15-min post ischemia

,,
Interventionml/100 ml tissue/min (Mean)
BaselineControl, GlucosePost Ischemia, GlucoseIntervention BaselineControl, after interventionPost Ischemia, intervention
Sevoflurane and Glucose6.488.267.108.477.908.45
Statin and Glucose7.329.917.008.179.286.26
Vitamin C and Glucose9.29.27.68.849.39.91

[back to top]

The Difference in LDL Cholesterol Levels Between the Basal and the Final Visit of Each Treatment Period.

Change from baseline in LDL cholesterol level following each Treatment Period was defined as the difference between the measurements from the baseline visit (Visit 4, Day 1) and Visit 9 (Day 84) for Treatment Period 1, and between the Visit 11 (Day 126) and Visit 16 (Day 210) for Treatment Period 2. (NCT01004705)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 84 of the Period 1 and Day 126 and Day 210 of Period 2

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Combination Pill-34.24
Simvastatin-27.95

[back to top]

The Difference in Mean Total Cholesterol Between the Basal and the Final Visit of Each Treatment Period.

Change from baseline in mean total cholesterol level following each Treatment Period was defined as the difference between the measurements from the baseline visit (Visit 4, Day 1) and Visit 9 (Day 84) for Treatment Period 1, and between the Visit 11 (Day 126) and Visit 16 (Day 210) for Treatment Period 2. (NCT01004705)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 84 of the Period 1 and Day 126 and Day 210 of Period 2

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Combination Pill-36.81
Simvastatin-29.81

[back to top]

Acute Exacerbation COPD Hospitalization Rates (Events/Patient Year)

(NCT01061671)
Timeframe: up to 37 months

Interventionevents per patient year (Mean)
Simvastatin0.31
Placebo0.31

[back to top]

Change in FEV1 (% Pred) From Baseline to Last Measure

(NCT01061671)
Timeframe: Baseline, last measure at up to 37 months

Interventionpercent predicted (Median)
Simvastatin-0.86
Placebo-1.81

[back to top]

Time to First COPD Exacerbation

(NCT01061671)
Timeframe: up to 37 months

InterventionDays to the first exacerbation (Median)
Simvastatin223
Placebo231

[back to top]

Rates of COPD Exacerbations

(NCT01061671)
Timeframe: up to 37 months

Interventionexacerbations/person-year (Mean)
Simvastatin1.36
Placebo1.39

[back to top]

Change in Measures of Reactive Oxygen Species in the Blood

Reactive Oxygen Species will be assessed after one month of placebo and statin therapy; measured using electron parametric resonance spectroscopy (EPR). (NCT01097785)
Timeframe: Baseline and 30 days

InterventionEPR Arbitrary Units (Mean)
Simvastatin8671500.00
Placebo14056500.00

[back to top]

Change in Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Bursts Per 100 Heartbeats

Muscle sympathetic nerve activity will be assessed after one month of placebo and statin therapy; measured in bursts/100 heartbeats. (NCT01097785)
Timeframe: Baseline and 30 days

Interventionbursts/100 heartbeats (Mean)
Simvastatin59
Placebo45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Serum Potassium

Least Squares (LS) Mean values were controlled for region, baseline measurement, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmilliequivalents/Liter (Least Squares Mean)
30 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy-0.04
100 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy0.01
500 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy-0.02
Placebo-0.08
20 mg Atorvastatin Monotherapy0.09
100 mg LY2484595 + 20 mg Atorvastatin0.08
40 mg Simvastatin Monotherapy0.03
100 mg LY2484595 + 40 mg Simvastatin0.02
10 mg Rosuvastatin Monotherapy-0.07
100 mg LY2484595 + 10 mg Rosuvastatin-0.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Serum Sodium

Least Squares (LS) Mean values were controlled for region, baseline measurement, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmilliequivalents/Liter (Least Squares Mean)
30 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy0.3
100 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy0.3
500 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy0.5
Placebo0.1
20 mg Atorvastatin Monotherapy1.3
100 mg LY2484595 + 20 mg Atorvastatin0.6
40 mg Simvastatin Monotherapy0.8
100 mg LY2484595 + 40 mg Simvastatin0.9
10 mg Rosuvastatin Monotherapy0.5
100 mg LY2484595 + 10 mg Rosuvastatin0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 18 Weeks Endpoint in EuroQoL Questionnaire - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score

EQ-5D is a health-related, quality-of-life instrument. It allows participants to rate their health state in 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and mood. A single score 1 -3 is generated for each domain, with 1=no problem and 3= extreme problems. The outcome ratings on the 5 domains are mapped to a single index through an algorithm. The index ranges 0-1, with the higher score indicating a better health state perceived by the participants. LS Mean values were controlled for region, baseline measurement, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 18

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
30 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy0.008
100 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy0.002
500 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy0.012
Placebo-0.001
20 mg Atorvastatin Monotherapy-0.002
100 mg LY2484595 + 20 mg Atorvastatin-0.006
40 mg Simvastatin Monotherapy-0.001
100 mg LY2484595 + 40 mg Simvastatin-0.001
10 mg Rosuvastatin Monotherapy0.014
100 mg LY2484595 + 10 mg Rosuvastatin-0.047

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) With LY2484595 and Placebo

Least Squares (LS) Mean values were controlled for region, baseline measurement, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change of mg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
30 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy53.6
100 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy94.6
500 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy128.8
Placebo-3.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) With LY2484595 in Combination With Atorvastatin and Atorvastatin Monotherapy

Least Squares (LS) Mean values were controlled for region, baseline measurement, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change of mg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
20 mg Atorvastatin Monotherapy1.4
100 mg LY2484595 + 20 mg Atorvastatin79.9

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) With LY2484595 in Combination With Simvastatin or Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin/Rosuvastatin Monotherapy

Least Squares (LS) Mean values were controlled for region, baseline measurement, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change of mg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
40 mg Simvastatin Monotherapy7.3
100 mg LY2484595 + 40 mg Simvastatin86.6
10 mg Rosuvastatin Monotherapy5.5
100 mg LY2484595 + 10 mg Rosuvastatin94.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) With LY2484595 and Placebo

Least Squares (LS) Mean values were controlled for region, baseline measurement, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change of mg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
30 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy-13.6
100 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy-22.3
500 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy-35.9
Placebo3.9

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) With LY2484595 in Combination With Atorvastatin and Atorvastatin Monotherapy

Least Squares (LS) Mean values were controlled for region, baseline measurement, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change of mg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
20 mg Atorvastatin Monotherapy-33.6
100 mg LY2484595 + 20 mg Atorvastatin-47.6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) With LY2484595 in Combination With Simvastatin or Rosuvastatin and Simvastatin/Rosuvastatin Monotherapy

Least Squares (LS) Mean values were controlled for region, baseline measurement, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change of mg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
40 mg Simvastatin Monotherapy-34.9
100 mg LY2484595 + 40 mg Simvastatin-46.1
10 mg Rosuvastatin Monotherapy-38.8
100 mg LY2484595 + 10 mg Rosuvastatin-52.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Plasma Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) Activity

Least Squares (LS) Mean values were controlled for region, baseline measurement, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change of picomoles/mL/minute (Least Squares Mean)
30 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy-49.48
100 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy-70.80
500 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy-89.10
Placebo12.12
20 mg Atorvastatin Monotherapy-0.01
100 mg LY2484595 + 20 mg Atorvastatin-72.00
40 mg Simvastatin Monotherapy-2.23
100 mg LY2484595 + 40 mg Simvastatin-64.64
10 mg Rosuvastatin Monotherapy-7.19
100 mg LY2484595 + 10 mg Rosuvastatin-73.24

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Plasma Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) Mass

Least Squares (LS) Mean values were controlled for region, baseline measurement, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change of micrograms/mL (mcg/mL) (Least Squares Mean)
30 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy63.94
100 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy92.27
500 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy136.66
Placebo0.58
20 mg Atorvastatin Monotherapy-11.8
100 mg LY2484595 + 20 mg Atorvastatin62.98
40 mg Simvastatin Monotherapy-11.14
100 mg LY2484595 + 40 mg Simvastatin65.92
10 mg Rosuvastatin Monotherapy-16.58
100 mg LY2484595 + 10 mg Rosuvastatin64.08

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics - LY2484595 Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) at Steady-State

(NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 weeks

Interventionnanograms*hour/milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Geometric Mean)
30 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy2300
100 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy5900
500 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy19700
100 mg LY2484595 + 20 mg Atorvastatin5500
100 mg LY2484595 + 40 mg Simvastatin5620
100 mg LY2484595 + 10 mg Rosuvastatin5960

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Blood Pressure (BP)

Least Squares (LS) Mean values were controlled for region, baseline measurement, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
Diastolic BPSystolic BP
10 mg Rosuvastatin Monotherapy2.20.0
100 mg LY2484595 + 10 mg Rosuvastatin-0.13.8
100 mg LY2484595 + 20 mg Atorvastatin1.22.1
100 mg LY2484595 + 40 mg Simvastatin2.32.3
100 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy0.84.3
20 mg Atorvastatin Monotherapy0.20.2
30 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy1.14.4
40 mg Simvastatin Monotherapy-1.50.0
500 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy1.21.4
Placebo1.62.8

[back to top]

The Number of Episodes of Rashes at Any Time From Baseline Through Week 12

All rash cases were adjudicated by a central dermatologist blinded to treatment assignment according to a study-specific Clinical Events Committee (CEC) charter. Rash events were assessed according to clinical relevance (high risk, low risk, not a relevant dermatosis, or insufficient documentation for determination). A participant could be reported in multiple categories. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 12

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionevents (Number)
High Risk (HR)- AngioedemaHR - Insufficient Documentation for DeterminationLow RiskNot a Relevant DermatosesInsufficient Documentation for Determination
10 mg Rosuvastatin Monotherapy00000
100 mg LY2484595 + 10 mg Rosuvastatin01210
100 mg LY2484595 + 20 mg Atorvastatin00020
100 mg LY2484595 + 40 mg Simvastatin00140
100 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy00050
20 mg Atorvastatin Monotherapy00010
30 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy00040
40 mg Simvastatin Monotherapy10060
500 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy00030
Placebo00000

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Plasma Renin Activity

Least Squares (LS) Mean values were controlled for region, baseline measurement, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionnanograms/milliliter/hour (ng/mL/h) (Least Squares Mean)
30 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy-0.06
100 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy-0.11
500 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy-0.58
Placebo-0.30
20 mg Atorvastatin Monotherapy-0.58
100 mg LY2484595 + 20 mg Atorvastatin-0.26
40 mg Simvastatin Monotherapy-0.16
100 mg LY2484595 + 40 mg Simvastatin0.00
10 mg Rosuvastatin Monotherapy-0.86
100 mg LY2484595 + 10 mg Rosuvastatin-0.29

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Serum Aldosterone

Least Squares (LS) Mean values were controlled for region, baseline measurement, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionnanogram/deciliter (ng/dL) (Least Squares Mean)
30 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy-0.5
100 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy1.0
500 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy-0.3
Placebo-1.0
20 mg Atorvastatin Monotherapy-1.0
100 mg LY2484595 + 20 mg Atorvastatin0.4
40 mg Simvastatin Monotherapy0.0
100 mg LY2484595 + 40 mg Simvastatin-1.7
10 mg Rosuvastatin Monotherapy-2.5
100 mg LY2484595 + 10 mg Rosuvastatin0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint in Serum Bicarbonate

Least Squares (LS) Mean values were controlled for region, baseline measurement, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. (NCT01105975)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmilliequivalents/Liter (Least Squares Mean)
30 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy0.40
100 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy0.60
500 mg LY2484595 Monotherapy0.51
Placebo0.27
20 mg Atorvastatin Monotherapy0.10
100 mg LY2484595 + 20 mg Atorvastatin0.58
40 mg Simvastatin Monotherapy1.04
100 mg LY2484595 + 40 mg Simvastatin0.58
10 mg Rosuvastatin Monotherapy0.78
100 mg LY2484595 + 10 mg Rosuvastatin1.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CSF Total Tau at 1 Year

CSF total tau was measured at baseline and after 1-year of intervention (NCT01142336)
Timeframe: 1-yr change

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Placebo-0.1
Simvastatin1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CSF ptau181 at 1 Year

ptau 181 measured in CSF at baseline and after 1-year intervention (NCT01142336)
Timeframe: 1-year change from baseline

Intervention1-yr change (final - baseline), pg/ml (Mean)
Placebo-2.9
Simvastatin1.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Aβ42 in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) at 1 Year

CSF Aβ42 concentration were measured at baseline and after 1-year intervention. (NCT01142336)
Timeframe: 1-year change of CSF Aβ42 from baseline

Intervention1-yr change, pg/ml (Mean)
Placebo5.3
Simvastatin0.5

[back to top]

Migraine Frequency: Change From Baseline 12-week Period to Weeks 13 to 24

(NCT01225263)
Timeframe: Weeks 13 to 24

Interventiondays (Median)
Simvastatin and Vitamin D-9.0
Placebo3.0

[back to top]

Migraine Frequency: Change From Baseline 12-week Period to Weeks 1 to 12

(NCT01225263)
Timeframe: Weeks 1 to 12

Interventiondays (Median)
Simvastatin and Vitamin D-8.0
Placebo1.0

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to an AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. Participants who were discontinued from the study due to an AE were recorded. (NCT01294683)
Timeframe: up 22 weeks (12 weeks in Periods I/II and 10 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 2g/40g10.1
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg10.5
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg2.2
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 2g/40g2.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Adjudicated Cardiovascular Event

Select serious adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality that occurred during the treatment phase of the study were adjudicated by an expert committee external to the sponsor. Those events confirmed by the committee a cardiovascular events were recorded. (NCT01294683)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Periods I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 2g/40g0.2
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg0.2
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg0.0
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 2g/40g0.0

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Consecutive Elevations in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) of >=3 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)

Participants had AST and ALT levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) and throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had an assessment of either AST or ALT that was 3 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST UNLs for males and females were 43 U/L and 36 U/L, respectively. The ALT UNLs for males and females were 40 U/L and 33 U/L, respectively. (NCT01294683)
Timeframe: Up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Periods I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 2g/40g0.4
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg0.6
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg1.3
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 2g/40g0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Creatine Kinase (CK) >=10 x ULN

Participants had CK levels assessed throughout the treatment periods. Participants who had any CK level that was >=10 x ULN were recorded. The UNLs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively. (NCT01294683)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Periods I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 2g/40g0.0
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg0.0
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg0.9
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 2g/40g0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=10 x ULN

Participants had AST and ALT levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had an assessment of either AST or ALT that was 10 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST UNLs for males and females were 43 U/L and 36 U/L, respectively. The ALT UNLs for males and females were 40 U/L and 33 U/L, respectively. (NCT01294683)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Periods I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 2g/40g0.0
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg0.0
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg0.0
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 2g/40g0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=5 x ULN

Participants had AST and ALT levels assessed during Period I (4 weeks ) throughout each 8 week treatment period (20 weeks total). Participants who had an assessment of either AST or ALT that was 5 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST UNLs for males and females were 43 U/L and 36 U/L, respectively. The ALT UNLs for males and females were 40 U/L and 33 U/L, respectively. (NCT01294683)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Periods I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 2g/40g0.2
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg0.4
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg0.9
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 2g/40g0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes

Participants who with newly diagnosed of diabetes were recorded. A participant was classified as having new onset diabetes if they experienced an AE related to a diagnosis of diabetes (based on a pre-defined set of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA] terms), or if they started taking an anti-diabetic medication during the course of the study. The MedDRA terms were as follows: diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus insulin-dependent, diabetes mellitus non-insulin dependent, insulin-requiring type II diabetes mellitus, insulin resistant diabetes, diabetes with hyperosmolarity, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults. (NCT01294683)
Timeframe: up 20 weeks (12 weeks in Periods I/II and 8 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 2g/40g1.0
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg0.4
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg1.3
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 2g/40g0.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least 1 AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. (NCT01294683)
Timeframe: up 22 weeks (12 weeks in Periods I/II and 10 weeks in Period III)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sequence 1: MK-0524B 2g/40g50.2
Sequence 2: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg51.2
Sequence 1: MK-0524A 2g + Simvastatin 40 mg30.4
Sequence 2: MK-0524B 2g/40g29.5

[back to top]

Empa: Area Under the Curve 0 to the Last Quantifiable Data Point (AUC0-tz)

"Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 to the time of the last quantifiable data point.~The geometric mean and geometric coefficient of variation (gCV) are adjusted values." (NCT01304329)
Timeframe: 0 hours (h), 20minutes (min), 40min, 1h, 1.5h, 2h, 2.5h, 3h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 12h, 24h, 34h, 48h, 72h after drug administration

Interventionnmol*h/L (Geometric Mean)
Empa Alone5481.31
Empa Plus Sim5619.60

[back to top]

Empa: Maximum Measured Concentration (Cmax)

"Maximum measured concentration of the analyte in plasma, per period.~The geometric mean and geometric coefficient of variation (gCV) are adjusted values" (NCT01304329)
Timeframe: 0 hours (h), 20minutes (min), 40min, 1h, 1.5h, 2h, 2.5h, 3h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 12h, 24h, 34h, 48h, 72h after drug administration

Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Empa Alone774.06
Empa Plus Sim847.49

[back to top]

Simvastatin: Area Under the Curve 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞)

"Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity. Simvastatin acid is an active metabolite of simvastatin.~The geometric mean (gMean) and geometric coefficient of variation (gCV) are adjusted values." (NCT01304329)
Timeframe: 0 hours (h), 20minutes (min), 40min, 1h, 1.5h, 2h, 2.5h, 3h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 12h, 24h, 34h, 48h, 72h after drug administration

,
Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
AUC of simvastatinAUC of simvastatin acid
Empa Plus Sim33.9317.65
Simvastatin Alone33.5116.83

[back to top]

Simvastatin: Area Under the Curve 0 to the Last Quantifiable Data Point (AUC0-tz)

"Area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 to the time of the last quantifiable data point.~The geometric mean and geometric coefficient of variation (gCV) are adjusted values." (NCT01304329)
Timeframe: 0 hours (h), 20minutes (min), 40min, 1h, 1.5h, 2h, 2.5h, 3h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 12h, 24h, 34h, 48h, 72h after drug administration

,
Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
AUC of simvastatinAUC of simvastatin acid
Empa Plus Sim32.5716.53
Simvastatin Alone31.8214.86

[back to top]

Simvastatin: Maximum Measured Concentration (Cmax)

"Maximum measured concentration of the analyte in plasma, per period.~The geometric mean and geometric coefficient of variation (gCV) are adjusted values." (NCT01304329)
Timeframe: 0 hours (h), 20minutes (min), 40min, 1h, 1.5h, 2h, 2.5h, 3h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 12h, 24h, 34h, 48h, 72h after drug administration

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cmax of simvastatinCmax of simvastatin acid
Empa Plus Sim7.651.47
Simvastatin Alone7.881.51

[back to top]

Empa: Area Under the Curve 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞)

"Area under the concentration-time curve of empagliflozin (empa) in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity.~The geometric mean (gMean) and geometric coefficient of variation (gCV) are adjusted values." (NCT01304329)
Timeframe: 0 hours (h), 20minutes (min), 40min, 1h, 1.5h, 2h, 2.5h, 3h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 12h, 24h, 34h, 48h, 72h after drug administration

Interventionnmol*h/L (Geometric Mean)
Empa Alone5571.70
Empa Plus Sim5685.69

[back to top]

Mean Dose

The first observed study medication fill during the participation identification period was defined as the index drug. The initial dose of the index drug was determined based on the pharmacy claims. (NCT01304641)
Timeframe: At least 3 months from the post-index date (baseline) or end of study (28 February 2009)

Interventionmg (Mean)
Atorvastatin19.46
Simvastatin28.36

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Post-index Cardiovascular (CV) Events

CV events were defined as an inpatient or emergency department admission for heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic heart disease (IHD), cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), aortic aneurysm, and/or revascularization. CV events were identified using medical claims. (NCT01304641)
Timeframe: At least 3 months from the post-index date (baseline) or end of study (28 February 2009)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Atorvastatin700
Simvastatin1012

[back to top]

Hazard Ratio for First Cardiovascular (CV) Event

Hazard ratio of atorvastatin versus simvastatin for first CV event. Hazard ratio of atorvastatin versus simvastatin was obtained from a Cox proportional hazards model. (NCT01304641)
Timeframe: At least 3 months from the post-index date (baseline) or end of study (28 February 2009)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Number of participants with eventNumber of participants without event
Atorvastatin70010770
Simvastatin101219120

[back to top]

Number of Participants Per Dose

Index dose was categorized as low dose (atorvastatin 10 mg, simvastatin up to 20 mg), medium dose (atorvastatin 20 mg, simvastatin 40 mg), and high dose (atorvastatin 40 or 80 mg, simvastatin 80 mg). (NCT01304641)
Timeframe: At least 3 months from the post-index date (baseline) or end of study (28 February 2009)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Low doseMedium doseHigh dose
Atorvastatin563939401891
Simvastatin1234467681020

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Adhered to Index Therapy

Percentage of participants who adhered to index therapy was evaluated. Treatment adherence was defined as the number of days covered by index medication divided by the number of days in the post-index period, expressed as a percentage. (NCT01304641)
Timeframe: At least 3 months from the post-index date (baseline) or end of study (28 February 2009)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Less than 80 percentGreater than or equal to 80 percent
Atorvastatin64.9235.08
Simvastatin57.3242.68

[back to top]

Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

(NCT01304641)
Timeframe: At least 3 months from the post-index date (baseline) or end of study (28 February 2009)

Interventionmilligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (Mean)
Atorvastatin94.07
Simvastatin98.03

[back to top]

Length of Post-index Period

Post-index period included time during which participants were observed for a minimum of 3 months following index date (fill date on which first observed atorvastatin or simvastatin was filled during the participant identification period) until disenrollment or end of study treatment (28 February 2009). (NCT01304641)
Timeframe: Index date (baseline) up to end of study (28 February 2009)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Atorvastatin519.10
Simvastatin448.41

[back to top]

Reduction of LDL Cholesterol Levels

The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of LDL-C variation at the end of nine weeks of treatment, compared to baseline (pre-randomization), in participants who achieved LDL <100 mg/dL were considered to have been successfully treated. (NCT01420549)
Timeframe: Baseline compared to the end of 9 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercent change of LDL (Least Squares Mean)
Rosuvastatin + Ezetimibe-39.45
Simvastatin + Ezetimibe-29.13

[back to top]

Mean Change in Cerebral Blood Flow as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Measurement of changes to cerebral blood flow (ml/110g/min) in regions of interest as measured using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (NCT01439555)
Timeframe: Baseline to 16 weeks

Interventionml/110g/min (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 8Week 16
Simvastatin + L-Arginine + Tetrahydrobiopterin0.6215280.64476920.6548226670.579838667

[back to top]

Cognitive Assessment Screening Test (CAST)

This outcome measured the change in average Cognitive Assessment Screening Test (CAST) scores for the participant group. The CAST is scored from 0 to 40. A higher score indicates better performance, and a lower score indicates worse performance. The participants were given the CAST at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 16 weeks post-baseline. The outcome reports on the averaged change for the averaged CAST scores from baseline to 16 weeks. (NCT01439555)
Timeframe: Baseline to 16 weeks post-baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Simvastatin + L-Arginine + Tetrahydrobiopterin31.4

[back to top]

Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale: Cognitive and Modified Version (ADAS-COG)

Mean Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale: Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-COG) score at baseline and at 16 weeks post-enrollment. The ADAS-COG consists of 11 tasks measuring disturbances of memory, language, praxis, attention and other cognitive abilities. Total scores range from 0 to 70, with higher scores (18 and above) indicating greater cognitive impairment. (NCT01439555)
Timeframe: Baseline to 16 weeks post-baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
ADAS-COG BaselineADAS-COG 16 weeks
Simvastatin + L-Arginine + Tetrahydrobiopterin21.621.9

[back to top]

Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR)

This outcome measures Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) scores at baseline (enrollment) and 16 weeks post-enrollment. The Clinical Dementia Rating Scale is scored with a composite scale of 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating lower functional status and lower scores indicating better functional status. (NCT01439555)
Timeframe: Baseline to 16 weeks post-baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
CDR Score at BaselineCDR Score at 16 weeks
Simvastatin + L-Arginine + Tetrahydrobiopterin0.90.9

[back to top]

Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scores

Change in mental state as reflected by changes to mean Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score as measured 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 16 weeks post-baseline. The MMSE uses a 30 point questionnaire to measure cognitive impairment. The MMSE is scored from 0 to 30,with a score equal to or greater than 24 points indicating normal cognition, a score of 19-23 points indicating mild cognitive impairment, 10-18 points indicating moderate impairment and a score equal to or below 9 indicating severe impairment. (NCT01439555)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 16 weeks post-baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 8Week 16
Simvastatin + L-Arginine + Tetrahydrobiopterin24.225.332625.55

[back to top]

Clinical Interview Based Impression of Change + Caregiver Input (CIBIC Plus)

The Clinical Interview Based Impression of Change + Caregiver Input (CIBIC Plus) is a semi-structured instrument to examine four major areas of patient function: General, Cognitive, Behavioral and Activities of Daily Living. It is scored from 1 to 7. A score of 1 indicates marked improvement, 4 indicates no change and 7 indicates marked worsening. (NCT01439555)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 16 weeks post-baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change in CIBIC score from baseline to 4 weeksChange in CIBIC Score from 4 weeks to 8 weeksChange in CIBIC Score from 8 weeks to 16 weeks
Simvastatin + L-Arginine + Tetrahydrobiopterin-.1.6-.1

[back to top]

Change in Sentinel Patch Area

"Change in percent depigmentation of sentinel patch lesion from baseline to last available study visit ( 6 months after randomization).~positive numbers mean increase or worsening of sentinel patch area negative numbers mean decrease or improvement of sentinel patch area" (NCT01517893)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomization

Interventioncm2 (Mean)
Intervention Arm-0.2272
Placebo Arm3.8571

[back to top]

Serum CXCL10 Levels From the First and Last Available Clinic Visits Were Measured Via ELISA

Determination of the effects of simvastatin treatment on Serum CXCL10 levels from the first and last available clinic visits were measured via ELISA in the blood of patients with vitiligo treated with simvastatin versus placebo (NCT01517893)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomization

InterventionFold change of baseline CXCL10 level (Mean)
Intervention Arm0.9148
Placebo Arm0.6176

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Increase in Investigator's Global Assessment Score

"Increase in Investigator Global Assessment Scores of 30% or more from baseline to last available visit.~Increase in score means improvement. 0% is no improvement at all. 100% is complete recovery." (NCT01517893)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomization

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intervention Arm1
Placebo Arm0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Increase in Patient's Global Assessment Score

Increase in Patient's Global Assessment Scores of 30% or more from baseline to last available visit Increase means improvement. minimum is 0% and maximum is 100% (NCT01517893)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomization

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intervention Arm0
Placebo Arm1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Decrease in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) Score

"Number of participants with 33% decrease in the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) from baseline to the last available study visit.~Decrease in VASI score means improvement. Minimum value is 0, that means no vitiligo. maximum value is 100, that means 100% of the body surface area has vitiligo (total body surface area)." (NCT01517893)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomization

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intervention Arm0
Placebo Arm0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity From of High-dose Simvastatin .

The number of participants who experienced toxicity based upon monitored lab values (Liver Function Test) and patient symptoms for evidence of simvastatin toxicity (NCT01517893)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline, then monthly until final study visit, six months after randomization.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intervention Arm0
Placebo Arm0

[back to top]

Change in Quality of Life Score by Using DERMATOLOGY LIFE QUALITY INDEX (DLQI)

"The aim of this questionnaire is to measure how much your skin problem has affected your life. We measured change in questionnaire score from baseline to end of study (at 6 months after randomization) of subjects randomized to treatment with simvastatin versus placebo. Change was measured as a drop in score at the end of 6 months of treatment.~Minimum score is 0, maximum is 30. Higher value means worse score." (NCT01517893)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomization

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intervention Arm3.4
Placebo Arm2.285714286

[back to top]

Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Parameters

"Change in atheroma volume and lumen CSA on IVUS as related to change in yellow plaque index as compared from baseline to 6-8 weeks after intervention.~Data not analyzed. Data not available." (NCT01567826)
Timeframe: at baseline and at 6-8 weeks after intervention

,
Interventionmm^2 (Mean)
Baseline Total atheroma volume6-8 weeks Total atheroma volumeBaseline Lumen CSA6-8 weeks Lumen CSA
Aggressive Lipid Therapy195.8209.62.52.5
Standard of Care Lipid Therapy193.7199.62.42.4

[back to top]

Change in LCBI, Lesion

Change in LCBI at 6-8 weeks after intervention as compared to baseline (NCT01567826)
Timeframe: at baseline and at 6-8 weeks post intervention

Interventionratio (Median)
Standard of Care Lipid Therapy8.0
Aggressive Lipid Therapy-22.5

[back to top]

LCBI4mm Max

LCBI4mm max = change in lipid-core burden index at the 4-mm maximal segment. Spectroscopic information obtained from raw spectra was transformed into a probability of lipid core that was mapped to a red-to-yellow color scale, with the low probability of lipid shown as red and the high probability of lipid shown as yellow. Yellow pixels within the analyzed segment were divided by all viable pixels to generate the lipid-core burden index (LCBI). The maximal value of LCBI for each nonculprit obstructive lesion was recorded and used for comparison. (NCT01567826)
Timeframe: at baseline and at 6-8 weeks after intervention

,
Interventionratio (Median)
Baseline LCBI4mm maxFollow-up LCBI4mm max
Aggressive Lipid Therapy490.6336.1
Standard of Care Lipid Therapy356.7385.7

[back to top]

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Value

Change in FFR as related to change in yellow plaque index as compared from baseline to 6-8 weeks after intervention. Fractional flow reserve (FFR), defined as the ratio of maximum flow in the presence of a stenosis to normal maximum flow, is a lesion-specific index of stenosis severity that can be calculated by simultaneous measurement of mean arterial, distal coronary, and central venous pressure. (NCT01567826)
Timeframe: at baseline and at 6-8 weeks after intervention

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
BaselineFollow-up
Aggressive Lipid Therapy0.730.75
Standard of Care Lipid Therapy0.730.73

[back to top]

Post PCI Cardiac Enzymes

Correlation of yellow plaque index with post procedure CK-MB, Troponin-I release. (NCT01567826)
Timeframe: at 6-8 weeks after intervention

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
CK-MBTroponin-I
Aggressive Lipid Therapy3.70.3
Standard of Care Lipid Therapy5.10.4

[back to top]

Lipiscan - Lipid Core Burden Index (LCBI)

The regression of yellow plaque content from the atherosclerotic lipid pool after statin therapy by utilizing NIR spectroscopy as compared from baseline to 6-8 weeks after intervention. Spectroscopic information obtained from raw spectra was transformed into a probability of lipid core that was mapped to a red-to-yellow color scale, with the low probability of lipid shown as red and the high probability of lipid shown as yellow. Analyses were performed offline using the Matlab-based software, as previously published. Yellow pixels within the analyzed segment were divided by all viable pixels to generate the lipid-core burden index (LCBI). The maximal value of LCBI for each nonculprit obstructive lesion was recorded and used for comparison. (NCT01567826)
Timeframe: at baseline and at 6-8 weeks after intervention

,
Interventionratio (Median)
Baseline LCBI, lesionFollow-up LCBI, lesion
Aggressive Lipid Therapy132.499.8
Standard of Care Lipid Therapy95.499.9

[back to top]

Change in LCBI4mm Max

Change in LCBI4mm max at 6-8 weeks after intervention as compared to baseline. LCBI4mm max = change in lipid-core burden index at the 4-mm maximal segment. (NCT01567826)
Timeframe: at baseline and at 6-8 weeks after intervention

Interventionratio (Median)
Standard of Care Lipid Therapy2.4
Aggressive Lipid Therapy-149.1

[back to top]

Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)

MACE defined as a combined clinical endpoint of death, MI (Q wave or non Q-wave with CK-MB >3 times above the upper normal limit (48 U/L), urgent revascularization or stroke at 30 days and 1 year. Details reported in adverse events section. (NCT01567826)
Timeframe: at 6-8 weeks after intervention

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Standard of Care Lipid Therapy2
Aggressive Lipid Therapy3

[back to top]

Blood Chemistry - HsCRP

Correlation of yellow plaque index with changes in levels of blood HsCRP as compared from baseline to 6-8 weeks after intervention (NCT01567826)
Timeframe: at baseline and at 6-8 weeks after intervention

,
Interventionmg/l (Median)
BaselineFollow-Up
Aggressive Lipid Therapy1.71.2
Standard of Care Lipid Therapy1.71.9

[back to top]

Diameter Stenosis

Percentage stenosis of vessel diameter in the analysis segment of nontarget lesions as measured by angiography that remained >70%, after successful PCI of the target lesion. (NCT01567826)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6-8 weeks post intervention

,
Interventionpercentage of lesions (Number)
BaselineFollow-up
Aggressive Lipid Therapy79.679.4
Standard of Care Lipid Therapy79.983

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Simvastatin

(NCT01632566)
Timeframe: Predose up to 48 hours post dose at Day -3 and Day 28

Interventionnanograms/milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
10 mg Simvastatin Day -31.78
10 mg Simvastatin Day 283.4

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of LY3031207

Maximum concentration (Cmax) of LY3031207 post-repeated once daily doses at Day 28. Day 28 results were not calculated for participants who received 225 mg LY3031207 because the study was terminated prior to participants reaching 28 days of dosing for this treatment arm. (NCT01632566)
Timeframe: Predose up to 48 hours post last dose at Day 28

Interventionnanograms/milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
25 mg LY30312071120
75 mg LY3031207 and Simvastatin2290

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) of Simvastatin

Area under the concentration versus time curve over the range of all measureable concentrations (AUC[0-tlast]) of simvastatin. (NCT01632566)
Timeframe: Predose up to 48 hours post dose at Day -3 and Day 28

Interventionnanograms*hours/milliliter (hr*ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
10 mg Simvastatin Day -35.23
10 mg Simvastatin Day 288.97

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) of LY3031207

Area under the concentration versus time curve in a dosing interval (AUC[0-tau]) of LY3031207 post-repeated once daily doses at Day 28. Day 28 results were not calculated for participants who received 225 mg LY3031207 because the study was terminated prior to participants reaching 28 days of dosing for this treatment arm. (NCT01632566)
Timeframe: Predose up to 48 hours post last dose at Day 28

Interventionnanograms*hours/milliliter (hr*ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
25 mg LY303120712000
75 mg LY3031207 and Simvastatin30400

[back to top] [back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Time of Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Simvastatin

(NCT01632566)
Timeframe: Predose up to 48 hours post dose at Day -3 and Day 28

Interventionhours (Median)
10 mg Simvastatin Day -32.00
10 mg Simvastatin Day 281.15

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Time of Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of LY3031207

Time of maximum concentration (Tmax) of LY3031207 post-repeated once daily doses at Day 28. Day 28 results were not calculated for participants who received 225 mg LY3031207 because the study was terminated prior to participants reaching 28 days of dosing for this treatment arm. (NCT01632566)
Timeframe: Predose up to 48 hours post last dose at Day 28

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
25 mg LY30312072.00
75 mg LY3031207 and Simvastatin3.00

[back to top]

Change in MADRS (4 Weeks)

Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in simvastatin-treated epochs versus placebo-treated epochs (NCT01665950)
Timeframe: Baseline vs week 4 (and, for placebo nonresponders in 1st 4 weeks, week 8 vs week 4)

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Simvastatin-Simvastatin-20
Placebo-Placebo-10

[back to top]

Percentage of Change of HDL-C (High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol)

Collection and measurement of blood samples. (NCT01674712)
Timeframe: from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercentage of change (Mean)
Fenofibrate/Simvastatin 145/20 mg9.0
Simvastatin 20 mg0.3
Fenofibrate/Simvastatin 145/40 mg8.8
Simvastatin 40 mg2.2
Fenofibrate 145 mg7.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Change of TG (Triglyceride)

Collection and measurement of blood samples. (NCT01674712)
Timeframe: from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercentage of change (Mean)
Fenofibrate/Simvastatin 145/20 mg-30.6
Simvastatin 20 mg10.7
Fenofibrate/Simvastatin 145/40 mg-27.3
Simvastatin 40 mg-2.9
Fenofibrate 145 mg-21.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Change of LDL-C (Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol)

Collection and measurement of blood samples. (NCT01674712)
Timeframe: from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercentage of change (Mean)
Fenofibrate/Simvastatin 145/20 mg1.9
Simvastatin 20 mg-2.0
Fenofibrate/Simvastatin 145/40 mg-6.1
Simvastatin 40 mg-8.1
Fenofibrate 145 mg30.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Week 16

Percent change from baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Week 0 value, divided by the Week 0 value ×100%. (NCT01678820)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC-17.5
Sitagliptin12.9
Simvastatin-2.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) at Week 16

Percent change from baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Week 0 value, divided by the Week 0 value ×100%. (NCT01678820)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC-20.4
Sitagliptin-4.9
Simvastatin-10.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-high Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 16

Percent change from baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Week 0 value, divided by the Week 0 value ×100%. (NCT01678820)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC-23.9
Sitagliptin0.6
Simvastatin-24.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 16

Percent change from baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Week 0 value, divided by the Week 0 value ×100%. (NCT01678820)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC-21.6
Sitagliptin4.0
Simvastatin-26.9

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 16

Percent change from baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Week 0 value, divided by the Week 0 value ×100%. (NCT01678820)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC2.5
Sitagliptin2.0
Simvastatin2.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) at Week 16

Percent change from baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Week 0 value, divided by the Week 0 value ×100%. (NCT01678820)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC-16.9
Sitagliptin3.3
Simvastatin-19.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event (AE)

Excludes data after rescue therapy. Adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. (NCT01678820)
Timeframe: Up to 16 weeks for non-serious AEs, up to 18 weeks for serious AEs

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC13
Sitagliptin13
Simvastatin17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 16 (Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC vs. Simvastatin)

A1C is measured as percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 16 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent. This primary outcome measure only includes results for sitagliptin/simvastatin FDC vs. simvastatin. Results for sitagliptin are presented above under primary outcome measures. (NCT01678820)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC-0.41
Simvastatin0.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 16

Change from baseline reflects the Week 16 value minus the Week 0 value. (NCT01678820)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC-7.9
Sitagliptin-9.6
Simvastatin21.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) at Week 16 (Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC vs. Sitagliptin)

A1C is measured as percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 16 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent. This primary outcome measure only includes results for sitagliptin/simvastatin FDC vs. sitagliptin. Results for simvastatin are presented below under secondary outcome measures. (NCT01678820)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC-0.41
Sitagliptin-0.59

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event

Excludes data after rescue therapy. Adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. (NCT01678820)
Timeframe: Up to 16 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC2
Sitagliptin1
Simvastatin2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Week 16

Percent change from baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Week 0 value, divided by the Week 0 value ×100%. (NCT01678820)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC-18.4
Sitagliptin-0.4
Simvastatin-18.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With A1C Level <7% at Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving glycemic goal (A1C <7%) after 16 weeks of treatment. Data as observed. (NCT01678820)
Timeframe: Week 16

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sitagliptin/Simvastatin FDC29.9
Sitagliptin29.6
Simvastatin17.6

[back to top]

Comparison of XueZhiKang With Simvastatin of Physical Activity Level

At baseline and week 4, we estimated physical activity level by short version of international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) with categorical score ranged from low to high. The higher score was meaning of lower physical activity level. (NCT01686451)
Timeframe: Measured at baseline and week 4

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Low level at baseline and week 4Moderate level at baseline and week 4High level at baseline and week 4
Simvastatin/Baseline14109
Simvastatin/Week 42580
XueZhiKang/Baseline31212
XueZhiKang/Week 43159

[back to top]

Comparison of Safety Laboratory Testing (Cr) Between Simvastatin- and Xuezhikang-group

Fasting blood samples were collected at weeks 0 (randomization) and 4 (end of study) for clinical chemistry. (NCT01686451)
Timeframe: Measured at baseline and week 4

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Simvastatin/Baseline72.57
Simvastatin/Week 471.95
XueZhiKang/Baseline75.59
XueZhiKang/Week 476.51

[back to top]

Treatment Efficacy

Treatment efficacy was estimated on the basis of triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), as well as LDL-C levels obtained at baseline and week 4. (NCT01686451)
Timeframe: Measured at baseline and week 4

,,,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
TG level at baseline and week 4TC level at baseline and week 4HDL level at baseline and week 4LDL level at baseline and week 4
Simvastatin/Baseline1.765.911.273.72
Simvastatin/Week 41.544.731.322.54
XueZhiKang/Baseline1.615.821.233.74
XueZhiKang/Week 41.364.721.372.45

[back to top]

Comparison Between XueZhiKang and Simvastatin on Fatigue Scores

At baseline and week 4, the fatigue score was assessed by a fatigue questionnaire named as Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) which used 10-item fatigue measure with the fatigue score ranged from 10-50. The higher score was meaning of higher level of fatigue. (NCT01686451)
Timeframe: Measured at baseline and week 4

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Simvastatin/Baseline19.58
Simvastatin/Week 421.58
XueZhiKang/Baseline19.26
XueZhiKang/Week 419.33

[back to top]

Treatment Adherence at Week 4 in Simvastatin- and Xuezhikang-group

We counted the total number of pills that were dispensed to the participants at baseline and the total number of pills that were taken by participants at week 4. (NCT01686451)
Timeframe: Measured at baseline and week 4

Interventionnumber of pills (Number)
Simvastatin/Baseline462
Simvastatin/Week 4462
XueZhiKang/Baseline3024
XueZhiKang/Week 43024

[back to top]

Comparison of Safety Laboratory Testings (ALT,AST,CPK) Between Simvastatin- and Xuezhikang-groups

Fasting blood samples were collected at weeks 0 (randomization) and 4 (end of study) for clinical chemistry. (NCT01686451)
Timeframe: Measured at baseline and week 4

,,,
InterventionU/L (Mean)
ALT level at baseline and week 4AST level at baseline and week 4CPK level at baseline and week 4
Simvastatin/Baseline28.5824.1280.82
Simvastatin/Week 428.7324.4282.76
XueZhiKang/Baseline30.3325.6391.65
XueZhiKang/Week 428.6725.8590.92

[back to top]

% Change in VO2max (Fitness)

% change in fitness between baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment will be assessed by VO2max (NCT01700530)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage change of VO2max (Mean)
Statin0
Exercise Only10
Statins + Exercise1.5

[back to top]

Skeletal Muscle Mitochondrial Content (Citrate Synthase Enzyme Activity)

% change in skeletal muscle mitochondrial content (measured by citrate synthase enzyme activity) from pre to post intervention (NCT01700530)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Statin0
Exercise Only13
Statins + Exercise-4.5

[back to top]

Change in Plasma High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein

Mean difference in plasma high sensitivity C-reactive protein level, before and after treatment with simvastatin (NCT01702246)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Interventionmg/mL (Mean)
Baseline7.2
Simvastatin2.989

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol Level After Treatment With Simvastatin

(NCT01702246)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Baseline Cholesterol124
Simvastatin Treatment101

[back to top]

Change in Frequency of Vaso-occlusive Pain Events, Before and After Treatment With Simvastatin

The effect of simvastatin treatment will be assessed by measuring the difference from baseline in the mean frequency (and intensity) of vaso-occlusive pain events, after treatment with simvastatin. Pain rate (proportion of pain days) was defined as the number of days reported with sickle cell disease-related pain divided by the number of daily pain diaries completed. (NCT01702246)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Interventionproportion of pain days (Mean)
Baseline0.2365
Simvastatin0.1311

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-high Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)

Change from baseline in non-HDL-C was measured as a percent change from baseline at Week 6 based on LDA model including percent change from baseline as response variable and term time. (NCT01702298)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg/Simvastatin 40 mg FDC-43.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Change from baseline in LDL-C was measured as a percent change from baseline at Week 6 based on LDA model including percent change from baseline as response variable and term time. (NCT01702298)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg/Simvastatin 40 mg FDC-46.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event

An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. (NCT01702298)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks (including 14 days after final dose of study drug)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sitagliptin 100 mg/Simvastatin 40 mg FDC9.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)

Change from baseline in HDL-C was measured as a percent change from baseline at Week 6 based on LDA model including percent change from baseline as response variable and term time. (NCT01702298)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg/Simvastatin 40 mg FDC1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Change from baseline in FPG at Week 6 based on longitudinal data analysis (LDA) model including both baseline and post-baseline measurements as response variable and term time. (NCT01702298)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg/Simvastatin 40 mg FDC-27.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event

Participants who were discontinued from study drug due to an adverse event during the 6 weeks of treatment. (NCT01702298)
Timeframe: Up to 6 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin 100 mg/Simvastatin 40 mg FDC0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)

Change from baseline in TG was measured as a percent change from baseline at Week 6 (median and distribution free 95% confidence interval). (NCT01702298)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Median)
Sitagliptin 100 mg/Simvastatin 40 mg FDC-31.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)

Change from baseline in TC was measured as a percent change from baseline at Week 6 based on LDA model including percent change from baseline as response variable and term time. (NCT01702298)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg/Simvastatin 40 mg FDC-33.7

[back to top]

Phosphocreatine Recovery

Percentage change in phosphocreatine recovery from baseline to month as measured by 31PMRS is the primary outcome measure is a representative of mitochondrial oxidative capacity (NCT01702987)
Timeframe: 1 month

Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Statin + Placebo-18.9
Statin + Ubiquinol7.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Very High CV Risk Participants Reaching Calculated LDL--C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) or High CV Risk Participants Reaching Calculated LDL--C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from a multiple imputation approach model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 i.e. up to 21 days after last injection (on-treatment analysis). (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: Up to week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg82.1
Placebo11.6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg6.0
Placebo-0.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from a multiple imputation approach model for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included in the imputation model (ITT analysis). (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg68.2
Placebo1.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Very High CV Risk Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) or High CV Risk Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from a multiple imputation approach model for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included in the imputation model (ITT analysis). (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg81.4
Placebo11.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-30.6
Placebo2.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off treatment. (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-26.6
Placebo3.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from a multiple imputation approach model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-30.3
Placebo-10

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 from a multiple imputation approach model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-24.7
Placebo-5.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL--C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 52 - On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted percentages at Week 52 were obtained from a multiple imputation approach model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 i.e. up to 21 days after last injection (on-treatment analysis). (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg68.8
Placebo1.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High -Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-42.6
Placebo3.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection). (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-43.2
Placebo3.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1 at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg0.4
Placebo-1.9

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1 at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg2.8
Placebo-1.6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-37.9
Placebo4.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-35.4
Placebo-0.9

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection). (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-43.2
Placebo-3.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-42.8
Placebo-3.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment (ITT analysis). (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-43.8
Placebo4.6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On- Treatment Analysis

Calculated LDL-C values were obtained using the Friedewald formula. Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection) (on-treatment analysis). (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-44.2
Placebo4.6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - Intent--to--Treat (ITT) Analysis

Calculated LDL-C values were obtained using the Friedewald formula. Adjusted Least- squares (LS) means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from a mixed -effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data. All available post -baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were used in the model. (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-48.7
Placebo2.8

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis

Calculated LDL-C values were obtained using the Friedewald formula. Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including available post baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection) (on-treatment analysis). (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-49.4
Placebo2.7

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 52 - ITT Analysis

Calculated LDL-C values were obtained using the Friedewald formula. Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 52 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off treatment (ITT analysis). (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-50.3
Placebo8.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 from a multiple imputation approach model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-8.1
Placebo0.6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from a multiple imputation approach model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg-10.4
Placebo0.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on-or off-treatment. (NCT01709500)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab 75 mg/up to 150 mg6.0
Placebo-0.8

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at Week 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W6.09
A10 PBO QM2.80
A10 EZE (Q2W)-12.14
A10 EZE (QM)-9.85
A10 EvoMab Q2W-40.74
A10 EvoMab QM-40.07
A80 PBO Q2W4.31
A80 PBO QM6.18
A80 EZE (Q2W)-10.53
A80 EZE (QM)-11.06
A80 EvoMab Q2W-40.79
A80 EvoMab QM-36.25
R5 PBO Q2W4.68
R5 PBO QM6.07
R5 EvoMab Q2W-38.57
R5 EvoMab QM-39.26
R40 PBO Q2W5.96
R40 PBO QM2.69
R40 EvoMab Q2W-35.17
R40 EvoMab QM-32.30
S40 PBO Q2W-0.20
S40 PBO QM5.13
S40 EvoMab Q2W-47.24
S40 EvoMab QM-39.47

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W6.80
A10 PBO QM1.28
A10 EZE (Q2W)-20.71
A10 EZE (QM)-16.56
A10 EvoMab Q2W-53.48
A10 EvoMab QM-56.09
A80 PBO Q2W10.74
A80 PBO QM8.45
A80 EZE (Q2W)-16.19
A80 EZE (QM)-18.79
A80 EvoMab Q2W-54.44
A80 EvoMab QM-56.31
R5 PBO Q2W7.02
R5 PBO QM3.73
R5 EvoMab Q2W-52.59
R5 EvoMab QM-55.47
R40 PBO Q2W6.19
R40 PBO QM1.58
R40 EvoMab Q2W-52.08
R40 EvoMab QM-55.72
S40 PBO Q2W0.74
S40 PBO QM6.81
S40 EvoMab Q2W-59.33
S40 EvoMab QM-56.01

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W8.25
A10 PBO QM2.43
A10 EZE (Q2W)-18.27
A10 EZE (QM)-14.78
A10 EvoMab Q2W-53.39
A10 EvoMab QM-52.20
A80 PBO Q2W11.79
A80 PBO QM9.95
A80 EZE (Q2W)-14.34
A80 EZE (QM)-17.26
A80 EvoMab Q2W-54.84
A80 EvoMab QM-50.05
R5 PBO Q2W7.92
R5 PBO QM5.85
R5 EvoMab Q2W-52.04
R5 EvoMab QM-51.57
R40 PBO Q2W8.61
R40 PBO QM3.35
R40 EvoMab Q2W-50.97
R40 EvoMab QM-46.42
S40 PBO Q2W1.89
S40 PBO QM5.66
S40 EvoMab Q2W-59.02
S40 EvoMab QM-50.96

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W9.86
A10 PBO QM0.97
A10 EZE (Q2W)-21.96
A10 EZE (QM)-17.08
A10 EvoMab Q2W-61.56
A10 EvoMab QM-58.19
A80 PBO Q2W14.49
A80 PBO QM11.83
A80 EZE (Q2W)-14.60
A80 EZE (QM)-19.80
A80 EvoMab Q2W-61.80
A80 EvoMab QM-58.68
R5 PBO Q2W8.12
R5 PBO QM5.10
R5 EvoMab Q2W-60.09
R5 EvoMab QM-59.40
R40 PBO Q2W9.42
R40 PBO QM2.59
R40 EvoMab Q2W-58.89
R40 EvoMab QM-52.40
S40 PBO Q2W4.70
S40 PBO QM3.40
S40 EvoMab Q2W-65.86
S40 EvoMab QM-57.02

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W7.34
A10 PBO QM-0.43
A10 EZE (Q2W)3.29
A10 EZE (QM)7.18
A10 EvoMab Q2W-25.87
A10 EvoMab QM-20.25
A80 PBO Q2W-2.23
A80 PBO QM3.41
A80 EZE (Q2W)8.01
A80 EZE (QM)10.20
A80 EvoMab Q2W-24.61
A80 EvoMab QM-24.68
R5 PBO Q2W11.40
R5 PBO QM4.49
R5 EvoMab Q2W-25.09
R5 EvoMab QM-20.85
R40 PBO Q2W10.38
R40 PBO QM10.21
R40 EvoMab Q2W-26.11
R40 EvoMab QM-21.97
S40 PBO Q2W-6.81
S40 PBO QM-1.06
S40 EvoMab Q2W-38.06
S40 EvoMab QM-29.23

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W6.07
A10 PBO QM-0.77
A10 EZE (Q2W)1.44
A10 EZE (QM)6.85
A10 EvoMab Q2W-26.01
A10 EvoMab QM-22.64
A80 PBO Q2W-3.45
A80 PBO QM1.51
A80 EZE (Q2W)8.05
A80 EZE (QM)9.96
A80 EvoMab Q2W-23.97
A80 EvoMab QM-27.46
R5 PBO Q2W11.41
R5 PBO QM3.65
R5 EvoMab Q2W-24.26
R5 EvoMab QM-23.16
R40 PBO Q2W8.59
R40 PBO QM6.26
R40 EvoMab Q2W-24.96
R40 EvoMab QM-25.93
S40 PBO Q2W-10.57
S40 PBO QM-4.99
S40 EvoMab Q2W-38.64
S40 EvoMab QM-32.16

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W8.54
A10 PBO QM0.35
A10 EZE (Q2W)-23.88
A10 EZE (QM)-18.98
A10 EvoMab Q2W-61.41
A10 EvoMab QM-62.47
A80 PBO Q2W13.12
A80 PBO QM9.76
A80 EZE (Q2W)-16.85
A80 EZE (QM)-21.25
A80 EvoMab Q2W-61.80
A80 EvoMab QM-65.05
R5 PBO Q2W7.55
R5 PBO QM2.79
R5 EvoMab Q2W-59.33
R5 EvoMab QM-63.79
R40 PBO Q2W6.57
R40 PBO QM-0.02
R40 EvoMab Q2W-59.08
R40 EvoMab QM-62.94
S40 PBO Q2W3.26
S40 PBO QM6.00
S40 EvoMab Q2W-66.17
S40 EvoMab QM-62.45

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W0.22
A10 PBO QM0.01
A10 EZE (Q2W)-1.76
A10 EZE (QM)-0.40
A10 EvoMab Q2W7.04
A10 EvoMab QM7.88
A80 PBO Q2W5.02
A80 PBO QM0.30
A80 EZE (Q2W)0.62
A80 EZE (QM)0.21
A80 EvoMab Q2W9.09
A80 EvoMab QM7.36
R5 PBO Q2W2.87
R5 PBO QM-0.16
R5 EvoMab Q2W6.07
R5 EvoMab QM7.18
R40 PBO Q2W-0.39
R40 PBO QM0.73
R40 EvoMab Q2W4.65
R40 EvoMab QM5.57
S40 PBO Q2W1.14
S40 PBO QM-2.65
S40 EvoMab Q2W10.92
S40 EvoMab QM6.41

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W-0.99
A10 PBO QM-0.45
A10 EZE (Q2W)-1.13
A10 EZE (QM)-0.92
A10 EvoMab Q2W5.54
A10 EvoMab QM7.66
A80 PBO Q2W4.48
A80 PBO QM-1.37
A80 EZE (Q2W)0.86
A80 EZE (QM)-0.59
A80 EvoMab Q2W8.44
A80 EvoMab QM7.76
R5 PBO Q2W0.87
R5 PBO QM-0.94
R5 EvoMab Q2W6.23
R5 EvoMab QM7.72
R40 PBO Q2W-0.60
R40 PBO QM-0.40
R40 EvoMab Q2W4.86
R40 EvoMab QM6.35
S40 PBO Q2W0.13
S40 PBO QM-2.14
S40 EvoMab Q2W10.35
S40 EvoMab QM6.71

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A1 Ratio at Week 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W6.13
A10 PBO QM-1.21
A10 EZE (Q2W)-14.51
A10 EZE (QM)-12.33
A10 EvoMab Q2W-54.17
A10 EvoMab QM-49.65
A80 PBO Q2W4.19
A80 PBO QM6.50
A80 EZE (Q2W)-13.69
A80 EZE (QM)-12.19
A80 EvoMab Q2W-53.59
A80 EvoMab QM-50.76
R5 PBO Q2W1.44
R5 PBO QM4.00
R5 EvoMab Q2W-52.97
R5 EvoMab QM-52.13
R40 PBO Q2W1.64
R40 PBO QM3.16
R40 EvoMab Q2W-47.53
R40 EvoMab QM-45.65
S40 PBO Q2W-1.80
S40 PBO QM-0.52
S40 EvoMab Q2W-59.53
S40 EvoMab QM-52.56

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A1 Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W6.41
A10 PBO QM0.78
A10 EZE (Q2W)-15.77
A10 EZE (QM)-11.47
A10 EvoMab Q2W-53.56
A10 EvoMab QM-53.33
A80 PBO Q2W4.48
A80 PBO QM5.79
A80 EZE (Q2W)-15.17
A80 EZE (QM)-12.91
A80 EvoMab Q2W-52.43
A80 EvoMab QM-56.20
R5 PBO Q2W2.82
R5 PBO QM2.58
R5 EvoMab Q2W-52.46
R5 EvoMab QM-56.66
R40 PBO Q2W2.17
R40 PBO QM2.60
R40 EvoMab Q2W-48.47
R40 EvoMab QM-54.17
S40 PBO Q2W-1.00
S40 PBO QM-1.42
S40 EvoMab Q2W-58.76
S40 EvoMab QM-57.47

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W7.89
A10 PBO QM0.21
A10 EZE (Q2W)-15.98
A10 EZE (QM)-10.95
A10 EvoMab Q2W-50.90
A10 EvoMab QM-47.15
A80 PBO Q2W11.64
A80 PBO QM6.54
A80 EZE (Q2W)-12.31
A80 EZE (QM)-12.16
A80 EvoMab Q2W-49.77
A80 EvoMab QM-46.47
R5 PBO Q2W6.35
R5 PBO QM4.63
R5 EvoMab Q2W-50.15
R5 EvoMab QM-48.58
R40 PBO Q2W4.91
R40 PBO QM3.24
R40 EvoMab Q2W-45.61
R40 EvoMab QM-43.71
S40 PBO Q2W0.35
S40 PBO QM3.57
S40 EvoMab Q2W-55.95
S40 EvoMab QM-49.16

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W7.55
A10 PBO QM0.81
A10 EZE (Q2W)-17.29
A10 EZE (QM)-11.43
A10 EvoMab Q2W-50.95
A10 EvoMab QM-51.44
A80 PBO Q2W10.20
A80 PBO QM5.48
A80 EZE (Q2W)-14.22
A80 EZE (QM)-13.62
A80 EvoMab Q2W-49.14
A80 EvoMab QM-53.26
R5 PBO Q2W5.07
R5 PBO QM2.54
R5 EvoMab Q2W-49.79
R5 EvoMab QM-53.59
R40 PBO Q2W3.71
R40 PBO QM1.98
R40 EvoMab Q2W-47.07
R40 EvoMab QM-52.95
S40 PBO Q2W-0.31
S40 PBO QM2.49
S40 EvoMab Q2W-55.65
S40 EvoMab QM-54.37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W8.6
A10 PBO QM0.8
A10 EZE (Q2W)-30.1
A10 EZE (QM)-23.3
A10 EvoMab Q2W-77.0
A10 EvoMab QM-75.1
A80 PBO Q2W12.7
A80 PBO QM7.0
A80 EZE (Q2W)-9.9
A80 EZE (QM)-19.5
A80 EvoMab Q2W-59.0
A80 EvoMab QM-54.8
R5 PBO Q2W7.8
R5 PBO QM2.4
R5 EvoMab Q2W-69.2
R5 EvoMab QM-73.3
R40 PBO Q2W5.1
R40 PBO QM-2.0
R40 EvoMab Q2W-52.1
R40 EvoMab QM-46.7
S40 PBO Q2W-4.5
S40 PBO QM-0.6
S40 EvoMab Q2W-83.5
S40 EvoMab QM-72.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in LDL-C at at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W6.8
A10 PBO QM-0.4
A10 EZE (Q2W)-32.4
A10 EZE (QM)-25.1
A10 EvoMab Q2W-76.8
A10 EvoMab QM-80.1
A80 PBO Q2W11.0
A80 PBO QM5.5
A80 EZE (Q2W)-13.0
A80 EZE (QM)-21.3
A80 EvoMab Q2W-58.8
A80 EvoMab QM-60.1
R5 PBO Q2W6.5
R5 PBO QM0.1
R5 EvoMab Q2W-68.9
R5 EvoMab QM-77.8
R40 PBO Q2W3.4
R40 PBO QM-4.8
R40 EvoMab Q2W-52.3
R40 EvoMab QM-55.3
S40 PBO Q2W-5.7
S40 PBO QM1.7
S40 EvoMab Q2W-83.8
S40 EvoMab QM-78.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W5.96
A10 PBO QM2.24
A10 EZE (Q2W)-14.39
A10 EZE (QM)-10.86
A10 EvoMab Q2W-40.44
A10 EvoMab QM-42.45
A80 PBO Q2W4.26
A80 PBO QM6.42
A80 EZE (Q2W)-11.92
A80 EZE (QM)-12.25
A80 EvoMab Q2W-40.22
A80 EvoMab QM-40.43
R5 PBO Q2W5.41
R5 PBO QM5.02
R5 EvoMab Q2W-39.33
R5 EvoMab QM-42.00
R40 PBO Q2W4.55
R40 PBO QM1.71
R40 EvoMab Q2W-36.04
R40 EvoMab QM-38.62
S40 PBO Q2W-0.14
S40 PBO QM5.45
S40 EvoMab Q2W-47.20
S40 EvoMab QM-43.17

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDL-C < 70 mg/dL at Week 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A10 PBO Q2W2.0
A10 PBO QM5.9
A10 EZE (Q2W)22.4
A10 EZE (QM)19.2
A10 EvoMab Q2W85.4
A10 EvoMab QM84.2
A80 PBO Q2W13.0
A80 PBO QM9.8
A80 EZE (Q2W)52.0
A80 EZE (QM)55.8
A80 EvoMab Q2W93.1
A80 EvoMab QM91.0
R5 PBO Q2W7.7
R5 PBO QM5.5
R5 EvoMab Q2W85.0
R5 EvoMab QM86.5
R40 PBO Q2W39.6
R40 PBO QM28.0
R40 EvoMab Q2W92.3
R40 EvoMab QM92.3
S40 PBO Q2W1.9
S40 PBO QM6.4
S40 EvoMab Q2W94.4
S40 EvoMab QM84.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dL

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Weeks 10 and 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A10 PBO Q2W5.7
A10 PBO QM5.6
A10 EZE (Q2W)20.0
A10 EZE (QM)16.7
A10 EvoMab Q2W88.1
A10 EvoMab QM85.8
A80 PBO Q2W13.7
A80 PBO QM9.3
A80 EZE (Q2W)50.9
A80 EZE (QM)62.3
A80 EvoMab Q2W94.4
A80 EvoMab QM92.5
R5 PBO Q2W7.0
R5 PBO QM5.3
R5 EvoMab Q2W88.7
R5 EvoMab QM89.9
R40 PBO Q2W38.9
R40 PBO QM28.8
R40 EvoMab Q2W93.5
R40 EvoMab QM94.5
S40 PBO Q2W1.9
S40 PBO QM3.9
S40 EvoMab Q2W93.6
S40 EvoMab QM88.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Very Low-Density Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Week 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W8.32
A10 PBO QM14.74
A10 EZE (Q2W)-4.61
A10 EZE (QM)3.45
A10 EvoMab Q2W-6.16
A10 EvoMab QM-11.73
A80 PBO Q2W6.73
A80 PBO QM8.54
A80 EZE (Q2W)-7.92
A80 EZE (QM)-6.00
A80 EvoMab Q2W-9.69
A80 EvoMab QM-1.06
R5 PBO Q2W13.79
R5 PBO QM12.47
R5 EvoMab Q2W-8.20
R5 EvoMab QM-6.28
R40 PBO Q2W10.09
R40 PBO QM8.59
R40 EvoMab Q2W-6.10
R40 EvoMab QM-9.95
S40 PBO Q2W7.63
S40 PBO QM20.97
S40 EvoMab Q2W-14.83
S40 EvoMab QM-15.86

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Very Low-Density Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W6.51
A10 PBO QM9.53
A10 EZE (Q2W)-5.35
A10 EZE (QM)1.77
A10 EvoMab Q2W-6.85
A10 EvoMab QM-11.77
A80 PBO Q2W6.24
A80 PBO QM8.31
A80 EZE (Q2W)-8.52
A80 EZE (QM)-6.13
A80 EvoMab Q2W-8.96
A80 EvoMab QM-6.38
R5 PBO Q2W12.86
R5 PBO QM12.54
R5 EvoMab Q2W-12.22
R5 EvoMab QM-7.25
R40 PBO Q2W7.06
R40 PBO QM8.13
R40 EvoMab Q2W-9.09
R40 EvoMab QM-15.05
S40 PBO Q2W8.64
S40 PBO QM16.37
S40 EvoMab Q2W-14.57
S40 EvoMab QM-16.50

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W8.27
A10 PBO QM14.35
A10 EZE (Q2W)-0.43
A10 EZE (QM)4.88
A10 EvoMab Q2W-3.79
A10 EvoMab QM-13.26
A80 PBO Q2W6.65
A80 PBO QM8.22
A80 EZE (Q2W)-7.40
A80 EZE (QM)-3.11
A80 EvoMab Q2W-10.07
A80 EvoMab QM-1.10
R5 PBO Q2W13.57
R5 PBO QM12.96
R5 EvoMab Q2W-4.46
R5 EvoMab QM-6.88
R40 PBO Q2W10.97
R40 PBO QM10.00
R40 EvoMab Q2W-5.58
R40 EvoMab QM-10.51
S40 PBO Q2W8.07
S40 PBO QM16.72
S40 EvoMab Q2W-13.71
S40 EvoMab QM-14.65

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

(NCT01763866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
A10 PBO Q2W6.49
A10 PBO QM9.17
A10 EZE (Q2W)-3.16
A10 EZE (QM)1.57
A10 EvoMab Q2W-5.61
A10 EvoMab QM-13.38
A80 PBO Q2W6.16
A80 PBO QM8.05
A80 EZE (Q2W)-8.10
A80 EZE (QM)-4.86
A80 EvoMab Q2W-9.27
A80 EvoMab QM-6.36
R5 PBO Q2W12.43
R5 PBO QM12.26
R5 EvoMab Q2W-10.28
R5 EvoMab QM-7.26
R40 PBO Q2W8.44
R40 PBO QM10.75
R40 EvoMab Q2W-9.15
R40 EvoMab QM-15.43
S40 PBO Q2W9.29
S40 PBO QM13.78
S40 EvoMab Q2W-11.67
S40 EvoMab QM-15.93

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1), Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)

LS Mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with baseline measurement, disease classification, statin dose, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction included in the model. Percent change from baseline response is the dependent variable. (NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

,,,,,
InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Apo A1Apo B
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W3.8-16.0
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W6.5-34.9
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W2.4-16.6
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W6.2-46.8
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W5.8-31.9
Placebo Q4W0.34.2

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve at Steady-State (AUC,ss) for LY3015014

(NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Week 12-16 (Q4W) - Predose, Week 8-16 (Q8W) - Predose

Interventionμg∙hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W1590
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W9670
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W27300
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W7800
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W26600

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Antibody (PCSK9) Levels

LS Mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with baseline measurement, disease classification, statin dose, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction included in the model. Percent change from baseline response is the dependent variable. (NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Q4W14.6
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W9.1
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W86.4
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W130.6
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W21.8
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W41.0

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]

Data was log-transformed for MMRM analysis, with change from baseline as the dependent variable, and baseline measurement, disease classification, statin dose, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction included as independent variables. Percentage change from baseline in the original scale was then back-calculated from the log-transformed MMRM analysis. (NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPercentage Change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Q4W-0.31
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W-16.63
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W-19.02
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W-37.29
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W-7.54
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W-21.01

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Injection Site Reaction

(NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo Q4W26
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W42
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W57
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W51
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W36
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W41

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Develop Treatment Emergent Anti-LY3015014 Antibodies

(NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo Q4W4
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W6
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W10
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W5
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W4
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP)

LS Mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with baseline measurement, disease classification, statin dose, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction included in the model. Percent change from baseline response is the dependent variable. (NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Q4W0.5
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W-0.2
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W1.6
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W-0.3
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W-0.3
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W-0.7

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Free Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Antibody (PCSK9) Levels

LS Mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with baseline measurement, disease classification, statin dose, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction included in the model. Percent change from baseline response is the dependent variable. (NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Q4W9.9
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W-16.3
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W-36.6
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W-68.0
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W-4.4
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W-35.2

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Least square (LS) Means was calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for disease classification, statin dose, baseline LDL-C measurement. Percent change from baseline response is the dependent variable. (NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Q4W7.6
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W-14.9
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W-40.5
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W-50.5
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W-14.9
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W-37.1

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C, Total Cholesterol (TC), High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), Non-HDL-C

LS Mean was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with baseline measurement, disease classification, statin dose, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction included in the model. Percent change from baseline response is the dependent variable. (NCT01890967)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

,,,,,
InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
LDL-CTGTCHDL-CNon-HDL-C
100 mg LY3015014 Q8W-18.4-7.2-11.04.5-16.1
120 mg LY3015014 Q4W-46.4-7.2-27.87.3-39.3
20 mg LY3015014 Q4W-18.0-6.1-10.54.5-16.1
300 mg LY3015014 Q4W-56.5-15.1-34.18.8-48.9
300 mg LY3015014 Q8W-42.2-10.6-24.68.4-35.8
Placebo Q4W5.93.53.51.64.9

[back to top]

CSF Abeta 1-42 Concentration

change in CSF abeta 1-42 concentration from baseline to 12 months of study drug treatment (NCT01952288)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 months

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Simvastatin43
Placebo82.5

[back to top]

CSF Abeta 1-40 Concentration

change in CSF abeta 1-40 concentration from baseline to 12 months of study drug treatment (NCT01952288)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 months

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Simvastatin753
Placebo953

[back to top]

Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) T-tau Concentration

Change in CSF total tau concentration from baseline to 12 months of study drug treatment (NCT01952288)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 months

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Simvastatin24
Placebo33.5

[back to top]

Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) P-tau 181 Concentration

Change in CSF p-tau 181 concentration from baseline to 12 months of study drug treatment (NCT01952288)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 months

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Simvastatin3.1
Placebo1.6

[back to top]

PK: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Zero to Infinity [AUC(0-∞)] of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid

The AUC(0-∞) of simvastatin (a CYP3A substrate) and its active acid metabolite (simvastatin acid) is reported. (NCT01960140)
Timeframe: Period 1, Day 1 and Period 2, Day 6: Predose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24 and 48 hours postdose

,
Interventionnanograms*hour/milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Simvastatin (n=39, 36)Simvastatin Acid (n=33, 32)
Baricitinib and Simvastatin33.721.0
Simvastatin40.726.4

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid

The Cmax of simvastatin [a cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A substrate] and its active acid metabolite (simvastatin acid) is reported. (NCT01960140)
Timeframe: Period 1, Day 1 and Period 2, Day 6: Predose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24 and 48 hours postdose

,
Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
SimvastatinSimvastatin Acid
Baricitinib and Simvastatin4.651.60
Simvastatin6.851.93

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Measureable Concentration (AUClast) of Simvastatin

AUClast is the area under the concentration versus time curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration. AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. (NCT01979185)
Timeframe: Study Periods 1 & 2: Within 30 minutes pre-dose, and Post-dose 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 hours.

Interventionng*h/ml (Mean)
Simvastatin Alone34.351
Simvastatin + SSP-004184SS24.019

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) for Simvastatin

AUCinf is the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve extrapolated from time 0 to infinity, calculated using the observed value of the last nonzero concentration. AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. (NCT01979185)
Timeframe: Study Periods 1 & 2: Within 30 minutes pre-dose, and Post-dose 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 hours.

Interventionng*h/ml (Mean)
Simvastatin Alone38.142
Simvastatin + SSP-004184SS26.601

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Simvastatin

Cmax is a term that refers to the maximum (or peak) concentration that a drug achieves in the body after the drug has been administrated. (NCT01979185)
Timeframe: Study Periods 1 & 2: Within 30 minutes pre-dose, and Post-dose 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 hours.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Simvastatin Alone5.006
Simvastatin + SSP-004184SS2.72

[back to top]

Peak Oxygen Consumption

Peak oxygen consumption( VO2peak) is defined as the highest rate at which oxygen can be taken up and utilized by the body during severe exercise. The participants were encouraged to exercise to exhaustion with progressive 2-minutes increments in the power output during the test. VO2peak was obtained when participants reached volitional exhaustion and met at least one of the following criteria: plateau in oxygen consumption despite increase in workload, rating of perceived exertion >18, Respiratory exchange ratio > 1.10 and peak heart rate within 10 beats of age predicted maximum. . As VO2peak (expressed as liters of oxygen consumed per minute) is also dependent on age, sex, and body size, it was expressed as percentage of the predicted value(VO2peak%). (NCT02030041)
Timeframe: Twelve weeks

Interventionpercentage of predicted value (Mean)
Simvastatin and Placebo43.8
Simvastatin and Vitamin D51.6
Vitamin D and Placebo53.5

[back to top]

Skeletal Muscle Mitochondrial Content

Skeletal muscle citrate synthase activity is a validated marker of mitochondrial content. Skeletal muscle biopsy was obtained from vastus lateralis muscle of five patients in either groups before and after the intervention. Under aseptic conditions, samples were taken in protease inhibitor cocktail and stored at -80ºC. Mitochondrial citrate synthase activity (the working range of the kit was 1.56-100 µg/mL, with intra and inter assay CV of 4.35-6.55 % and 8.3 % respectively) was measured using ELISA Kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) as per manufacturer's instructions.Skeletal muscle citrate synthase activity is a validated marker of mitochondrial content. (NCT02030041)
Timeframe: Twelve weeks

Interventionchange in mOD/min at 412nm (Mean)
Simvastatin and Placebo0.005
Simvastatin and Vitamin D0.005
Vitamin D and Placebo0.0052

[back to top]

Percent Predicted FEV1

Lung function will be measured by FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1s mean and calculated as % predicted +_ SD (standard deviation). (NCT02061397)
Timeframe: 5 months

Interventionpercent predicted FEV1 (Mean)
Single Simvastatin Treatment Arm-2.9

[back to top]

Safety of Simvastatin in the Treatment of LAM-S and LAM-TS Patients

Safety is a primary outcome measure which will be assessed by any major changes or deterioration in patient health. (NCT02061397)
Timeframe: 5 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Single Simvastatin Treatment Arm0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

Number of participants with concurrent administration of simvastatin with (neo)adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in early stage breast cancer patients who experience adverse events as defined by NCI CTCAE v4.0. (NCT02096588)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Simvastatin15

[back to top]

Change in Echocardiographic Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS)

To compare the absolute change in echocardiographic GLS (Global Longitudinal Strain) from baseline (T0) to 2-3 weeks after (T2) completion of 4 cycles of (neo)adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in early stage breast cancer patients who do and do not receive concurrent simvastatin therapy (NCT02096588)
Timeframe: up to 15 weeks

InterventionPercentage change in GLS (Mean)
Simvastatin0.42
No Drug1.11

[back to top]

PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Evacetrapib

Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates from evacetrapib following single dose and daily doses of 130 mg. (NCT02156492)
Timeframe: Part 1: Day 1 and Day 14 Predose 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, and 168 hours Postdose; Part 2 Day 14: Predose 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours Postdose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Single Dose Day 1Multiple Dose Day 14
Evacetrapib Single and Multiple Dose418954

[back to top]

PK: Cmax of Evacetrapib Alone and With Simvastatin or Atorvastatin

Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates of evacetrapib following 130 mg evacetrapib daily alone or with 40 mg simvastatin or 20 mg atorvastatin daily. (NCT02156492)
Timeframe: Part 2: Day 14 and 22 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours Postdose.

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Days 5-14Days 15- 22
Evacetrapib Daily and Simvastatin11801020
Evactrapib Daily and Atorvastatin11201000

[back to top]

PK: Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Evacetrapib

Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates of evacetrapib following single and daily doses of 130 mg evacetrapib. (NCT02156492)
Timeframe: Part 1: Day 1 Predose on Day 1 or Day 14 and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, and 168 hours postdose. Part 2: Predose on Day 14 at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours post dose.

Interventionhours (h) (Median)
Single Dose Day 1Daily Dose Day 14
Evacetrapib Single and Multiple Dose3.003.00

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under Curve (AUC 0-inf) of Evacetrapib

Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter estimates from evacetrapib concentrations following single dose and daily dose of 130 mg evacetrapib. (NCT02156492)
Timeframe: Part 1: Day 1 Predose 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, and 168 hours Postdose; Part 2 Day 14 Predose 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 hours Postdose

Interventionnanogram * hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 14
Evacetrapib Single and Multiple Dose770023600

[back to top]

Effect of Evacetrapib Single and Multiple Doses on High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), and Triglycerides (TG)

(NCT02156492)
Timeframe: Single Dose Day 2 and Multiple Dose Day 22

,
Interventionmillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
HDL-CLDL-CTG
Evacetrapib Multiple Dose Day 222.6761.2411.221
Evacetrapib Single Dose Day 21.6412.2890.984

[back to top]

PK: AUC of Evacetrapib Alone and With Simvastatin or Atorvastatin

Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates of evacetrapib following 130 mg evacetrapib daily alone or with 40 mg simvastatin or 20 mg atorvastatin daily AUC (0-24). (NCT02156492)
Timeframe: Part 2: Day 14 and 22 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours Postdose

,
Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Days 5-14Days 15-22
Evacetrapib Daily and Atorvastatin106009480
Evacetrapib Daily and Simvastatin107009640

[back to top]

PK: Tmax of Evacetrapib Alone and With Simvastatin or Atorvastatin

Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates of Tmax of evacetrapib following 130 mg daily dose alone or with 40 mg Simvastatin or 20 mg Atorvastatin. Tmax of simvastatin and atorvastatin. (NCT02156492)
Timeframe: Part 2: Predose on Day 14 and 22 and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postdose.

,
Interventionh (Median)
Days 5-14Days 15- 22
Evacetrapib Daily and Atrovastatin3.003.00
Evacetrapib Daily and Simvastatin3.003.00

[back to top]

Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Levels

Similar to secondary outcome measure but focusing on Low Density Lipoprotein, Systolic Blood Pressure, and Hemoglobin A1c (NCT02188121)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months
Statin and/or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker10086
Usual Treatment106100

[back to top]

Number of Participants on Adequate Cardiovascular Prevention Care (Defined as Taking a Statin and Angiotensin Medication)

(NCT02188121)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Statin and/or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker66
Usual Treatment8

[back to top]

AUC of Simvastatin

Pharmacokinetics of simvastatin by assessment of area under the plasma concentration time curve from zero to infinity (NCT02197234)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected on Days 1 and 31 at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 28, and 32 hours post simvastatin dose in Part A

Interventionng.h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Simvastatin Alone80.25
AZD9291 + Simvastatin73.54

[back to top]

AUC of Simvastatin Acid

Pharmacokinetics of simvastatin acid by assessment of area under the plasma concentration time curve from zero to infinity (NCT02197234)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected on Days 1 and 31 at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 28, and 32 hours post simvastatin dose in Part A

Interventionng.h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Simvastatin Alone31.18
AZD9291 + Simvastatin30.16

[back to top]

CL/F of Simvastatin

Rate and extent of absorption of simvastatin by assessment of apparent clearance following oral administration (NCT02197234)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected on Days 1 and 31 at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 28, and 32 hours post simvastatin dose in Part A

InterventionL/h (Geometric Mean)
Simvastatin Alone498.3
AZD9291 + Simvastatin543.9

[back to top]

Cmax of Simvastatin

Pharmacokinetics of simvastatin by assessment of maximum plasma simvastatin concentration (NCT02197234)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected on Days 1 and 31 at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 28, and 32 hours post simvastatin dose in Part A

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Simvastatin Alone24.54
AZD9291 + Simvastatin18.65

[back to top]

Cmax of Simvastatin Acid

Pharmacokinetics of simvastatin acid by assessment of maximum plasma simvastatin acid concentration (NCT02197234)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected on Days 1 and 31 at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 28, and 32 hours post simvastatin dose in Part A

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Simvastatin Alone4.187
AZD9291 + Simvastatin4.161

[back to top]

AUC(0-t) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid

Pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and simvastatin acid by assessment of area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero to last quantifiable dose (NCT02197234)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected on Days 1 and 31 at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 28, and 32 hours post simvastatin dose in Part A

,
Interventionng.h/mL (Geometric Mean)
SimvastatinSimvastatin acid
AZD9291 + Simvastatin70.1729.60
Simvastatin Alone77.9729.25

[back to top]

Tmax of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid

Pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and simvastatin acid by time to Cmax (NCT02197234)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected on Days 1 and 31 at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 28, and 32 hours post simvastatin dose in Part A

,
Interventionhours (Median)
SimvastatinSimvastatin acid
AZD9291 + Simvastatin1.503.08
Simvastatin Alone1.503.08

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax) of LY2623091

(NCT02300259)
Timeframe: Group 1 (Days 1 and 6) Group 4 (Days 1 and 4): Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 hours (hr) postdose; additionally for Group 1 (Day 6): 264, 288, 312, 336, 360 hr postdose

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
LY2623091 (Group 1)61.9
Itraconazole + LY2623091 (Group 1)66.9
LY2623091 (Group 4)61.8
Diltiazem + LY2623091 (Group 4)64.2

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Time T, Where T is the Last Time Point With a Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-tlast]) of LY2623091

(NCT02300259)
Timeframe: Group 1 (Days 1 and 6) Group 4 (Days 1 and 4): Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 hours (hr) postdose; additionally for Group 1 (Day 6): 264, 288, 312, 336, 360 hr postdose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
LY2623091 (Group 1)2480
Itraconazole + LY2623091 (Group 1)5240
LY2623091 (Group 4)2340
Diltiazem + LY2623091 (Group 4)3130

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Time T, Where T is the Last Time Point With a Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-tlast]) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid

(NCT02300259)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 12: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 hours postdose

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
SimvastatinSimvastatin Acid
LY2623091 + Simvastatin23.06.87
Simvastatin (Group 2)16.55.42

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) of LY2623091

(NCT02300259)
Timeframe: Group 1 (Days 1 and 6) Group 4 (Days 1 and 4): Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 hours (hr) postdose; additionally for Group 1 (Day 6): 264, 288, 312, 336, 360 hr postdose

Interventionnanograms*hour/milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Geometric Mean)
LY2623091 (Group 1)2540
Itraconazole + LY2623091 (Group 1)5660
LY2623091 (Group 4)2390
Diltiazem + LY2623091 (Group 4)3360

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid

(NCT02300259)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 12: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 hours postdose

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
SimvastatinSimvastatin Acid
LY2623091 + Simvastatin (Group 2)9.890.877
Simvastatin (Group 2)7.780.720

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid

(NCT02300259)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 12: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 hours postdose

,
Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
SimvastatinSimvastatin Acid
LY2623091 + Simvastatin24.18.88
Simvastatin (Group 2)17.47.15

[back to top]

Leukocyte Rolling Flux Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

Interactions between leukocytes and human umbilical vein endothelial cells were evaluated by flow chamber microscopy. Leukocyte rolling was estimated as the number of leukocytes rolling over 100 μm2 of the endothelial monolayer during a 1-min period. (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionpolymorphonuclear cells/min (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe421392196
Simvastatin412225147

[back to top]

Leukocyte Adhesion Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

Interactions between leukocytes and human umbilical vein endothelial cells were evaluated by flow chamber microscopy. Adhesion was evaluated by counting the number of polymorphonuclear cells that maintained stable contact with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) for 30 seconds. (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionpolymorphonuclear cells/mm2 (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe25.623.812.5
Simvastatin25.115.010.9

[back to top]

High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDLc) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc) concentration was measured using a direct method (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe535353
Simvastatin475051

[back to top]

Apolipoprotein B Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

Levels of apolipoprotein B were determined by inmunonephelometry (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe12711079
Simvastatin1399284

[back to top]

Levels of E-selectin Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

E-selectin was evaluated in serum by Luminex® 200™ system (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe39.730.524.4
Simvastatin45.138.929.2

[back to top]

Levels of Glutathione (GSH) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

Oxidative stress markers (levels of glutathione (GSH)) was measured at baseline and after treatment by fluorometric techniques (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
InterventionFluorescence Units (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe2.853.797.51
Simvastatin2.685.677.92

[back to top]

Levels of High-sensitive C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

Levels of high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were analysed by a latex-enhanced inmunonephelometric assay (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionmg/l (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe4.433.983.31
Simvastatin4.022.822.64

[back to top]

Levels of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1 (ICAM-1) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

The intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) was evaluated in serum by Luminex® 200™ system (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe160.6114.7108.1
Simvastatin188139.5122.2

[back to top]

Levels of Tumor Necrosis Factor α (TNF-α) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

Levels of proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α)) were analysed with a Luminex® 200™ system (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe3.015.094.35
Simvastatin3.433.994.43

[back to top]

Levels of Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 (VCAM-1) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

The vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) was evaluated in serum by Luminex® 200™ system (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe137111661220
Simvastatin131411371074

[back to top]

Low Density Lipoprotein Size Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

LDL subfractions were separated by high-resolution polyacrylamide gel tubes using the Lipoprint® system. The LDL electrophoretic profile allows 2 patterns to be defined: pattern A or large and buoyant LDL, and pattern non-A or small and dense LDL. (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
InterventionAngström (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe270.4271.5272.0
Simvastatin268.1270.4271.7

[back to top]

Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDLc) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) concentration was calculated using the method of Friedewald. (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe17213894
Simvastatin17810698

[back to top]

Membrane Potential Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

Oxidative stress markers (membrane potential) was measured at baseline and after treatment by fluorometric techniques (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
InterventionFluorescence Units (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe48.456.767.5
Simvastatin46.662.570.4

[back to top]

Leukocyte Rolling Velocity Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

Interactions between leukocytes and human umbilical vein endothelial cells were evaluated by flow chamber microscopy.The rolling velocity in the field of focus was determined by measuring the time required by 20 consecutive leukocytes to cover a distance of 100 μm. (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionmicrometer/second (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe524533629
Simvastatin469553608

[back to top]

Mitochondrial Oxygen (O2) Consumption Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

Oxidative stress markers (mitochondrial oxygen (O2) consumption) was measured at baseline and after treatment by Clark electrode (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
InterventionNmol O2/min/million cells (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe1.091.311.67
Simvastatin1.091.541.76

[back to top]

Non-HDL Cholesterol Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

Non-HDLc concentration was obtained by calculating the difference between total cholesterol and HDLc (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe200162115
Simvastatin208130122

[back to top]

Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Production Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

Oxidative stress markers (Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production) was measured at baseline and after treatment by fluorometric techniques (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
InterventionFluorescence Units (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe72.863.548.9
Simvastatin74.757.243.3

[back to top]

Total Cholesterol Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

Total cholesterol concentration was measured by enzymatic assay (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe253215169
Simvastatin255180173

[back to top]

Triglycerides Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

Triglyceride concentration were measured by enzymatic assay (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionmg/dl (Median)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe12010581
Simvastatin141117104

[back to top]

Levels of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Before and After Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Administration

Levels of proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin-6 (IL-6)) were analysed with a Luminex® 200™ system (NCT02304926)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

,
Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Baseline4 weeks8 weeks
Ezetimibe2.943.935.78
Simvastatin2.442.834.43

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behavior Based on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

"C-SSRS captures occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. Suicidal behavior is defined as a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide. Suicidal ideation is defined as a yes answer to any one of 5 suicidal ideation questions: wish to be dead, and 4 different categories of active suicidal ideation." (NCT02406261)
Timeframe: Cohort A: Baseline to Study Completion (Up to Day 50); Cohort B: Baseline to Study Completion (Up to Day 70)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Suicidal IdeationSuicidal Behavior
Cohort A00
Cohort B00

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic (PK): Area Under the Curve Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-∞]) for LY3314814

(NCT02406261)
Timeframe: Day 4: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours (Cohort A)

InterventionNanogram * hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cohort A3200

[back to top]

PK Profile for Midazolam: AUC(0-∞) Oral and IV Dose

(NCT02406261)
Timeframe: Day 1, 3, 17, 35, and 37: Predose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, and 12 hours (Cohort A)

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
AUC(0-∞) Oral Day 1AUC(0-∞) Oral Day 17AUC(0-∞) Oral Day 35AUC(0-∞) IV Day 3AUC(0-∞) IV Day 37
Cohort A6.536.245.5911.411.6

[back to top]

PK Profile for Simvastatin: AUC(0-∞)

(NCT02406261)
Timeframe: Day 2 and 36: Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours (Cohort A)

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
AUC(0-∞) Simvastatin Day 2AUC(0-∞) Simvastatin Day 36
Cohort A15.121.2

[back to top]

PK Profile for Donepezil: AUC(0-∞)

(NCT02406261)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 28: predose 0.5,1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96,120, 216, 288, and 360 hours (Cohort B)

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 28
Cohort B271285

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) and/or >=50% Reduction From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12

LDL-Cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald formula. Percentage of participants who reached LDL-C <70 mg/dL at Week 12 and/or >=50% reduction from baseline in LDL-C at Week 12 are reported. (NCT02476006)
Timeframe: At Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alirocumab69.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12

LDL-Cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald formula. Percentage of participants who reached calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at week 12 were reported. (NCT02476006)
Timeframe: At Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alirocumab50.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12

Calculated LDL-C values were obtained using the Friedewald formula. Calculated LDL-C in mg/dL from Friedewald formula (LDL cholesterol = Total cholesterol - HDL cholesterol - [Triglyceride/5]). Baseline value was defined as the last observation before the first dose of the treatment. (NCT02476006)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Alirocumab-54.84

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12

Baseline value was defined as the last observation before the first dose of the treatment. (NCT02476006)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Alirocumab4.37

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 12

Baseline value was defined as the last observation before the first dose of the treatment. (NCT02476006)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Alirocumab-45.89

[back to top]

Assessment of Participant's Acceptability of Self-Injection Using Self Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ): Feeling About Injections, Self Confidence, Satisfaction With Self-Injections

Pre-SIAQ: self-completed before first self-injection & Post-SIAQ: self-completed after self-injection. Pre-SIAQ consisted of 7 items grouped into 3 domains:feelings about injections,self-confidence & satisfaction with self-injection. Post-SIAQ consisted of 21 items grouped into 6 domains:feelings about injections,self-image,self-confidence,injection-site reactions,ease of use & satisfaction with self-injection. Participants rated each item on 5-point (or 6-point) semantic Likert-type scale, where lower numbers indicate a worse experience. Item scores were transformed to obtain a score ranging from 0 (worst experience) to 10 (best experience). Transformed scores for items contributing to a domain were then averaged into a domain score. Each domain score ranges from 0 (worst experience) to 10 (best experience), higher score=better acceptability. Domain scores common to the Pre & Post SIAQ were analyzed on participants belonging to Pre & Post-SIAQ population and are reported. (NCT02476006)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-SIAQ), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Feelings about injections: BaselineFeeling about injections: Week 4Feeling about injections: Week 8Feeling about injections: Week 12Feeling about injections: Week 24Feeling about injections: Week 48Feeling about injections: Week 72Feeling about injections: Week 96Self confidence: BaselineSelf Confidence: Week 4Self Confidence: Week 8Self Confidence: Week 12Self Confidence: Week 24Self Confidence: Week 48Self Confidence: Week 72Self Confidence: Week 96Satisfaction with self injection: BaselineSatisfaction with self-injections: Week 4Satisfaction with self-injections: Week 8Satisfaction with self-injections: Week 12Satisfaction with self-injections: Week 24Satisfaction with self-injections: Week 48Satisfaction with self-injections: Week 72Satisfaction with self-injections: Week 96
Alirocumab8.69.19.19.29.29.29.29.36.98.08.18.18.08.18.38.47.28.58.78.78.68.78.88.8

[back to top]

Assessment of Participant's Acceptability of Self-Injection Using Self Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ): Self Image, Injection-Site Reactions, Ease of Use

SIAQ: contained 2 modules: Pre-SIAQ and Post-SIAQ. Post-SIAQ: self-completed after self-injection. Post-SIAQ consisted of 21 items grouped into 6 domains: feelings about injections, self-image, self-confidence, injection-site reactions, ease of use & satisfaction with self-injection. Participants rated each item on 5-point (or 6-point) semantic Likert-type scale, where lower numbers indicated a worse experience. Item scores were transformed to obtain a score ranging from 0 (worst experience) to 10 (best experience) for each item. Transformed scores for items contributing to a domain were then averaged into a domain score. Each domain score ranges from 0 (worst experience) to 10 (best experience), higher score=better acceptability. Domain scores which are not in common with Pre-SIAQ were analyzed on the Post-SIAQ population and are reported here. (NCT02476006)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Self Image: Week 4Self Image: Week 8Self Image: Week 12Self Image: Week 24Self Image: Week 48Self Image: Week 72Self Image: Week 96Injection-site reactions: Week 4Injection-site reactions: Week 8Injection-site reactions: Week 12Injection-site reactions: Week 24Injection-site reactions: Week 48Injection-site reactions: Week 72Injection-site reactions: Week 96Ease of use: Week 4Ease of use: Week 8Ease of use: Week 12Ease of use: Week 24Ease of use: Week 48Ease of use: Week 72Ease of use: Week 96
Alirocumab9.49.49.49.39.49.39.49.69.69.69.59.59.59.58.78.78.88.88.99.09.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs that that developed or worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (time from the first injection of study drug up to the day of the last injection of study drug + 14 days). A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. (NCT02476006)
Timeframe: From first injection of investigational medicinal product (IMP) up to 2 weeks after last dose of study drug (Week 120)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Any TEAEAny treatment emergent SAEAny TEAE leading to deathAny TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation
Alirocumab71.616.20.24.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 12

Baseline value was defined as the last observation before the first dose of the treatment. (NCT02476006)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Alirocumab-38.28

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12

Baseline value was defined as the last observation before the first dose of the treatment. (NCT02476006)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Alirocumab-8.28

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 12

LDL-Cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald formula. Percentage of participants who reached calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at week 12 were reported. (NCT02476006)
Timeframe: At Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Alirocumab74.6

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of LY3202328 (LY) in Part A After a Single Dose

Pharmacokinetics (PK) is the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of LY3202328 Part A after a single dose. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 96 hours Postdose

Interventionnanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Part A: 1 mg LY48.258
Part A: 3 mg LY105.023
Part A: 10 mg LY340.829
Part A: 30 mg LY581.782
Part A: 100 mg LY1600.953
Part A: 300 mg LY1632.595
Part A: 600 mg LY2866.855
Part A: 30 mg LY Fed1105.999

[back to top]

PD: Change From Baseline to Last Day of Dosing in Fasting Total Triglycerides in Part B

PD is the change from baseline to last day of dosing in fasting total triglycerides in Part B. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Predose, Days 7, 14, 21, and 28 Postdose

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Part B: Placebo0.205
Part B: 5 mg LY-0.131
Part B: 20 mg LY-0.231
Part B: 100 mg LY0.020
Part B: 300 mg LY-0.480

[back to top]

PD: Change From Baseline to Last Day of Dosing in Fasting Total Cholesterol in Part B

PD is the change from baseline to last day of dosing in fasting total cholesterol in Part B. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Predose, Days 7, 14, 21, and 28 Postdose

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Part B: Placebo0.206
Part B: 5 mg LY0.118
Part B: 20 mg LY0.183
Part B: 100 mg LY0.174
Part B: 300 mg LY-0.190

[back to top]

PD: Change From Baseline to Last Day of Dosing in Fasting LDL-c in Part B

PD is the change from baseline to last day of dosing in fasting LDL-c in Part B. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Predose, Days 7, 14, 21, and 28 Postdose

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Part B: Placebo0.103
Part B: 5 mg LY0.184
Part B: 20 mg LY0.388
Part B: 100 mg LY0.227
Part B: 300 mg LY0.131

[back to top]

PD: Change From Baseline to Last Day of Dosing in Fasting HDL-c in Part B

PD is the change from baseline to last day of dosing in fasting HDL-c in Part B. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Predose, Days 7, 14, 21, and 28 Postdose

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Part B: Placebo0.008
Part B: 5 mg LY-0.010
Part B: 20 mg LY-0.101
Part B: 100 mg LY-0.107
Part B: 300 mg LY-0.101

[back to top] [back to top]

Pharmacodynamics (PD): Change From Baseline in Fasting High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-c) in Part A

Pharmacodynamics (PD) is the change from Baseline in Fasting High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-c) in Part A. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Predose, 24, 48, 96 Hours Postdose

,,,,,,,
Interventionmillimole/Liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
24 Hours48 Hours96 Hours
Part A: 1 mg LY-0.030-0.039-0.073
Part A: 10 mg LY-0.047-0.043-0.134
Part A: 100 mg LY0.0520.019-0.091
Part A: 3 mg LY-0.0430.009-0.086
Part A: 30 mg LY-0.026-0.026-0.030
Part A: 300 mg LY-0.004-0.009-0.082
Part A: 600 mg LY0.010-0.052-0.005
Part A: Placebo-0.003-0.037-0.074

[back to top]

PK: Cmax of Atorvastatin With/Without LY3202328 (LY) in Part B

PK: Cmax of Atorvastatin with/without LY3202328 (LY) Co-administration in Part B. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Day -7 and Day 28: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours Postdose

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Placebo5 mg LY20 mg LY100 mg LY300 mg LY
Atorvastatin Alone (Reference)3.5753.6211.2863.1051.376
Atorvastatin With LY (Test)3.4792.8401.2382.5111.489

[back to top]

PK: Cmax of Simvastatin With/Without LY3202328 (LY) in Part B

PK: Cmax of Simvastatin with/without LY3202328 (LY) Co-administration in Part B. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Day -7 and Day 28: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours Postdose

,
Interventionng/ml (Geometric Mean)
Placebo5 mg LY20 mg LY100 mg LY300 mg LY
Simvastatin Alone (Reference)2.0613.3743.2744.3031.979
Simvastatin With LY (Test)2.9062.3883.5764.6344.221

[back to top]

PK: Steady State Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of LY3202328 (LY) in Part B

PK is the maximum plasma concentration of LY3202328 (Cmax) at steady state in Part B. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Day 28: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours Postdose

Interventionng/ml (Geometric Mean)
Part B: 5 mg LY445.858
Part B: 20 mg LY882.125
Part B: 100 mg LY3687.167
Part B: 300 mg LY3209.396

[back to top]

PD: Change From Baseline to in Fasting Total Cholesterol in Part A

PD is the change from baseline in fasting total cholesterol in Part A. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Predose, 24, 28, 96 Hours Postdose

,,,,,,,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
24 Hours48 Hours96 Hours
Part A: 1 mg LY-0.186-0.436-0.527
Part A: 10 mg LY-0.203-0.376-0.609
Part A: 100 mg LY0.2850.091-0.317
Part A: 3 mg LY-0.013-0.030-0.207
Part A: 30 mg LY0.073-0.013-0.199
Part A: 300 mg LY0.2030.134-0.155
Part A: 600 mg LY0.093-0.026-0.041
Part A: Placebo0.085-0.085-0.318

[back to top]

PD: Change From Baseline in Fasting Total Triglycerides Part A

PD is the change from baseline in fasting total triglycerides in Part A. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Predose, 24, 48, 96 Hours Postdose

,,,,,,,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
24 Hours48 Hours96 Hours
Part A: 1 mg LY-0.397-0.269-0.209
Part A: 10 mg LY-0.386-0.2600.013
Part A: 100 mg LY-0.523-0.766-0.455
Part A: 3 mg LY-0.190-0.115-0.132
Part A: 30 mg LY-0.311-0.418-0.331
Part A: 300 mg LY-0.064-0.226-0.326
Part A: 600 mg LY-0.302-0.1980.158
Part A: Placebo-0.276-0.320-0.239

[back to top]

PK: Area Under Concentration Curve From Zero to Time (AUC [0-t]) of Simvastatin With/Without LY3202328 (LY) in Part B

PK: Area Under Concentration Curve From Zero to Time (AUC [0-t]) of Simvastatin with/without LY3202328 (LY) Co-administration in Part B. AUC from time 0 to time t, where t is the time of last quantifiable plasma concentration. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Day -7 and Day 28: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours Postdose

,
Interventionhr*ng/ml (Geometric Mean)
Placebo5 mg LY20 mg LY100 mg LY300 mg LY
Simvastatin Alone (Reference)6.2509.2877.96010.4348.951
Simvastatin With LY (Test)9.6486.6689.69714.26911.908

[back to top]

PK: Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of LY3202328 (LY) in Part A

PK is the time to maximum concentration (Tmax) of LY3202328 in Part A (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Day 1: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 96 hours Postdose

Interventionhour (hr) (Median)
Part A: 1 mg LY2.02
Part A: 3 mg LY3.52
Part A: 10 mg LY4.0
Part A: 30 mg LY4.00
Part A: 100 mg LY6.00
Part A: 300 mg LY4.02
Part A: 600 mg LY4.00
Part A: 30 mg LY Fed5.00

[back to top]

PK: Steady State Tmax of LY3202328 (LY) in Part B

PK is the Tmax of LY3202328 at steady state in Part B. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Day 28: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours Postdose

Interventionhr (Median)
Part B: 5 mg LY2.00
Part B: 20 mg LY4.20
Part B: 100 mg LY3.00
Part B: 300 mg LY3.04

[back to top]

PK: AUC (0-t) of Atorvastatin With/Without LY3202328 (LY) in Part B

PK: AUC (0-t) of Atorvastatin with/without LY3202328 (LY) Co-administration in Part B. AUC from time 0 to time t, where t is the time of last quantifiable plasma concentration. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Day -7 and Day 28: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours Postdose

,
Interventionhr*ng/ml (Geometric Mean)
Placebo5 mg LY20 mg LY100 mg LY300 mg LY
Atorvastatin Alone (Reference)16.51814.9137.95213.2079.111
Atorvastatin With LY (Test)15.87417.3117.92111.9837.748

[back to top]

PK: Steady State Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve During the Dosing Interval (AUCτ) of LY3202328 (LY) in Part B

PK is the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUCτ) of LY3202328 at steady state during the dosing interval in Part B. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Day 28: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours Postdose

Interventionhour*nanogram/milliliter(hr*ng/ml) (Geometric Mean)
Part B: 5 mg LY7587.24
Part B: 20 mg LY13362.44
Part B: 100 mg LY67499.80
Part B: 300 mg LY50774.85

[back to top]

PK: Area Under the Serum Concentration Time Curve From Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-∞]) of LY3202328 (LY) in Part A After a Single Dose

PK is the area under the serum concentration time curve from zero to Infinity (AUC[0-∞]) of LY3202328 in Part A after a single dose. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Day 1: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 96 hours Postdose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Part A: 1 mg LYNA
Part A: 3 mg of LYNA
Part A: 10 mg LY7726.17
Part A: 30 mg LY17018.43
Part A: 100 mg of LY55406.24
Part A: 300 mg LY66185.70
Part A: 600 mg LYNA
Part A: 30 mg LY Fed28415.22

[back to top]

PD: Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-c) in Part A

PD is the change from baseline in fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) Part A. (NCT02714569)
Timeframe: Predose, 24, 48, 96 Hours Postdose

,,,,,,,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
24 Hours48 Hours96 Hours
Part A: 1 mg LY0.025-0.275-0.358
Part A: 10 mg LY0.020-0.214-0.481
Part A: 100 mg LY0.4710.419-0.020
Part A: 3 mg LY0.1170.013-0.061
Part A: 30 mg LY0.2410.203-0.018
Part A: 300 mg LY0.2360.2450.075
Part A: 600 mg LY0.163-0.0010.038
Part A: Placebo0.2310.111-0.109

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24: ITT Analysis

Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included in the imputation model. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ezetimibe 10 mg40.5
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W85.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg-14.9
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-34.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24: ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 up to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionpercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg-13.8
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-33.9

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 24: On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection or 3 days after the last capsule, whichever came first) (on-treatment analysis). (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionpercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg-20.4
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-49.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg-20.7
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-47.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 24: ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionpercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg-19.4
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-47.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12: ITT Analysis

Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent Change (Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg6.313
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-30.064

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Week 24: ITT Analysis

Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model for handling missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included in the imputation model. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionpercent Change (Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg3.956
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-30.317

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 24: ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg6.5
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W8.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg6.1
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W7.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 12: ITT Analysis

Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained by using multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg-13.585
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-9.965

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) at Week 24: ITT Analysis

Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained by using multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg-14.409
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-14.462

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 24: On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection or 3 days after the last capsule, whichever came first) (on-treatment analysis). (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg-21.3
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-58.7

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 24: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis

Adjusted least square (LS) means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from mixed models analysis with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were used in the model (ITT analysis). (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg-20.3
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-56.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection or 3 days after the last capsule, whichever came first) (on-treatment analysis). (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg-22.7
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-58.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg-22.2
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-57.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 24: On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection or 3 days after the last capsule, whichever came first) (on-treatment analysis). (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionpercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg-17.4
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-45.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12: ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg-16.5
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-43.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) at Week 24: ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionpercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg-16.2
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W-43.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 12 : ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg1.1
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W3.7

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) at Week 24: ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment. (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Ezetimibe 10 mg-0.2
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W3.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24: On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach including all available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection or 3 days after the last capsule, whichever came first) (on-treatment analysis). (NCT02715726)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ezetimibe 10 mg42.1
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W87.0

[back to top]

Serum and Pancreatic Secretions

Expression of three biomarkers, HGF (hepatocyte growth factor), Resistin, and FASL (Fas ligand) in fluorescent intensity (arbitrary units), as an estimate of immune analyte concentration. (NCT02743364)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

,
Interventionmedian fluorescent intensity (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline HGF6 month HGFBaseline Resistin6 month ResistinBaseline FASL6 month FASL
Arm I (Simvastatin)5.725.7613.7912.944.994.83
Arm II (Placebo)7.135.9912.3912.454.834.82

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change in the Endoscopic Ultrasound Score (EUS)

Change in EUS score (0-96) from baseline to up to 6 months. EUS Score is a measure of pancreatitis by the presence or absence of nine ductal and parenchymal criteria for CP: hyperechoic foci, hyperechoic strands, cysts, lobularity, calcifications, hyperechoic duct margins, visual side branches, main pancreatic duct dilation, and main pancreatic duct irregularity, which sum to a score ranging from 0 to 96. Presence of 6 or more standard criteria indicates advanced chronic pancreatitis. A positive score indicates an improvement. A negative score indicates a reduction. (NCT02743364)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm I (Simvastatin)0.500
Arm II (Placebo)0.500

[back to top]

Change in Peak Bicarbonate Concentration, Measured Using Endoscopic Pancreatic Function Test (ePFT)

Change in peak bicarbonate level (mmol/l) from baseline up to 6 months. Decreased peak bicarbonate concentration indicates worsening pancreatic function. (NCT02743364)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 6 months

Interventionmmol/l (Mean)
Arm I (Simvastatin)-8.20
Arm II (Placebo)5.50

[back to top]

Change in Interleukin 6 at Base to 24 Hours

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: Baseline - 24 hours

InterventionMicrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) (Mean)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )0.118
Control Group0.201

[back to top]

Change in Interleukin 6 Baseline to 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: Baseline - 1 week

InterventionMicrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) (Mean)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )0.304
Control Group0.275

[back to top]

Change in Interleukin 8 24 Hours to 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: 24 hours - 1 week

InterventionMicrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) (Mean)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )168.894
Control Group-44.42

[back to top]

Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 24 Hours

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: Baseline- 24hrs

InterventionMicrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) (Mean)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )37.526
Control Group-0.17

[back to top]

Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: Baseline - 1 week

InterventionMicrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) (Mean)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )131.368
Control Group20.275

[back to top]

Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 24 Hours

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: Baseline - 24 hours

InterventionMicrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) (Mean)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )0.00
Control Group64.696

[back to top]

Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha 24 Hours to 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: 24hrs - 1 week

InterventionMicrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) (Mean)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )1.641
Control Group0.095

[back to top]

Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: Baseline - 1 week

InterventionMicrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) (Mean)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )1.5833
Control Group-0.0704

[back to top]

Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week

"Using the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the Buccal, Lingual, Mesial and Distal Surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system:~0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding~minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding~moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure~strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site the scores are summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score." (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: 1 week

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Gingival sscore of 0.50Gingival sscore of 1Gingival sscore of 1.25Gingival sscore of 1.50Gingival sscore of 1.75
Control Group111730
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment)121740

[back to top]

Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours

"Using the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the Buccal, Lingual, Mesial and Distal Surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system:~0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding~minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding~moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure~strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site the scores are summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score." (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: 24 hours

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Gingival sscore of 0.50Gingival sscore of 1Gingival sscore of 1.25Gingival sscore of 1.50Gingival sscore of 1.75
Control Group141250
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment)116610

[back to top]

Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at Baseline

"Using the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the Buccal, Lingual, Mesial and Distal Surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system:~0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding~minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding~moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure~strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site the scores are summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score." (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Gingival index score of 0.50Gingival index score of 1Gingival index score of 1.25Gingival index score of 1.5Gingival index score of 1.75
Control Group001282
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment)101841

[back to top]

Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week

"Depth will be measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, Mesiobuccal, Mid Buccal, Distobuccal, Disto Lingual, Mid Lingual and Mesio Lingual. The longitudinal course will be characterized with respect to the categorical outcome, presence of any bleeding on probing, with initial emphasis being placed upon transition approaches, with specific attention given to shifts from clinically unacceptable to clinically acceptable designations.~probing depth is considered variable from one person to the other however a decrease or a shallower probing depth overtime is gererally seen as an improvement , thus any decrease in probing depth would be seen as signs of healing." (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: 1 week

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Probing Depth Score 1Probing Depth Score 2Probing Depth 3Probing Depth 4Probing Depth 5Probing Depth 6
Control Group0413320
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment)148740

[back to top]

Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours

"Depth will be measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, Mesiobuccal, Mid Buccal, Distobuccal, Disto Lingual, Mid Lingual and Mesio Lingual. The longitudinal course will be characterized with respect to the categorical outcome, presence of any bleeding on probing, with initial emphasis being placed upon transition approaches, with specific attention given to shifts from clinically unacceptable to clinically acceptable designations.~probing depth is considered variable from one person to the other however a decrease or a shallower probing depth overtime is gererally seen as an improvement , thus any decrease in probing depth would be seen as signs of healing." (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: 24 hours

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Probing Depth Score 1Probing Depth Score 2Probing Depth 3Probing Depth 4Probing Depth 5Probing Depth 6
Control Group0510610
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment)157821

[back to top]

Change in Interleukin 1 B 24 Hours - 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: 24 hours - 1 week

InterventionMicrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) (Mean)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )3.577
Control Group-2.108

[back to top]

Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline

"Depth will be measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, Mesiobuccal, Mid Buccal, Distobuccal, Disto Lingual, Mid Lingual and Mesio Lingual. The longitudinal course will be characterized with respect to the categorical outcome, presence of any bleeding on probing, with initial emphasis being placed upon transition approaches, with specific attention given to shifts from clinically unacceptable to clinically acceptable designations.~probing depth is considered variable from one person to the other however a decrease or a shallower probing depth overtime is gererally seen as an improvement , thus any decrease in probing depth would be seen as signs of healing." (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Probing Depth Score 1Probing Depth Score 2Probing Depth 3Probing Depth 4Probing Depth 5Probing Depth 6
Control Group1510600
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment)039930

[back to top]

Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: Baseline - 1 week

InterventionMicrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) (Mean)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )2.5016
Control Group-1.095

[back to top]

Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 24 Hours

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: Baseline- 24hrs

InterventionMicrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) (Mean)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )-1.075
Control Group1.013

[back to top]

Change in Interleukin 6 24 Hours - 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) (NCT03400475)
Timeframe: 24 hours - 1 week

InterventionMicrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) (Mean)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )0.185
Control Group0.073

[back to top]

Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)

The change in CAL will be measured and calculated by measuring recession and subtracting the periodontal probing depth. (NCT03452891)
Timeframe: The CAL will be measured at 12-months.

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
SIM-MCL7.0
Methylcellulose Gel6.9

[back to top]

Cleaved Caspase-3 (CC3) as a Marker of Apoptosis

The difference in (percentage of cells cleaved caspase-3 (CC3)+) from pre-treatment to post-treatment (NCT03454529)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 4 weeks

Interventionpercentage of cells expressing CC3 (Mean)
Treatment (Simvastatin)5.4

[back to top]

Change in (% Intracellular p27 +) From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment

the difference in (% intracellular p27 +) from pre-treatment to post-treatment (NCT03454529)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 4 weeks

Interventionpercentage of intracellular p27 + (Mean)
Treatment (Simvastatin)0.3

[back to top]

Changes in p27 Cytoplasmic Intensity

the difference in (p27 cytoplasmic intensity) from pre-treatment to post-treatment (NCT03454529)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 4 weeks

Interventionarbitrary units (Mean)
Treatment (Simvastatin)1.8

[back to top]

Changes in Cyclin D1

the difference in % cyclin D1+ stained out of total cells from pre-treatment to post-treatment; (NCT03454529)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 4 weeks

Interventionpercentage of total cells cyclin + (Mean)
Treatment (Simvastatin)6.1

[back to top]

Change in Percentage of Cells P27+ From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment

The difference in percentage of cells P27+ from pre-treatment to post-treatment (NCT03454529)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 4 weeks

Interventionpercentage of cells 'biomarker' positive (Mean)
Treatment (Simvastatin)-1.4

[back to top]

Change in Ki-67 Expression Assessed in Tumor Tissue by Immunohistochemistry

Differences in % positive cells pre and post treatment along with 95% confidence interval (NCT03454529)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 4 weeks

Interventionpercentage of cells expressing Ki67 (Mean)
Treatment (Simvastatin)1.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Tanner Staging at Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development in children and adolescent based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. Participants were evaluated for pubic hair distribution, breast development (only females) and genital development (only males), and classified in 3 categories as: Prepubescent (defined as a person just before start of the development of adult sexual characteristics), Pubescent (defined as a person at or approaching the age of puberty), Postpubescent (sexually mature or a person who has completed puberty). (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline: PrepubescentBaseline: PubescentBaseline: Post-pubescentWeek 12: PrepubescentWeek 12: PubescentWeek 12: Post-pubescentWeek 24: PrepubescentWeek 24: PubescentWeek 24: Post-pubescentWeek 48: PrepubescentWeek 48: PubescentWeek 48: Post-pubescent
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2W090081081072
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/up to 150 mg Q2W360360260170

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab-4.2-11.80.9

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C Level at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab-33.4-43.0-15.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Weeks 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab-10.14.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab11.314.611.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab2.85.210.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Weeks 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab13.08.910.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein a (Lp) (a) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on-or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab7.4-5.2-6.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48 - ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab-3.9-9.25.7

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Weeks 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab-1.9-6.35.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis

Adjusted least square (LS) means and standard errors were obtained from the mixed model analysis with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data using all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab-4.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting >=15 Percent (%) Reduction in LDL-C Level at Weeks 12, 24 and 48: ITT Analysis/On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted Percentage were obtained from a multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 48 regardless of status on- or off-treatment used in the model (ITT analysis). Although separate analyses of all available data (ITT analysis) and only data collected within a defined time window (On-treatment analysis) were planned, if all values used in the ITT approach were within the on-treatment time window, the on-treatment analysis would be identical to the ITT analysis, thus the results would be identical and a single outcome measure presenting the results for both types of analysis would be provided. (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Alirocumab50.050.039.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: On-treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were obtained from the MMRM model to account for missing data using all available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 48 (on-treatment Analysis). (NCT03510715)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Alirocumab-4.1

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline data up to Week 24. Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W7.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W11.9
DB Period: Placebo Q4W12.2
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-6.8

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline data up to Week 12. Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W6.5
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-2.2
DB Period: Placebo Q4W7.8
Db Period: Alirocumab Q4W-0.3

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data. All post-baseline data available up to Week 12 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W8.9
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-30.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W1.1
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-31.7

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline data available up to Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-0.8
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W5.6
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-1.1
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W3.4

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline data available up to Week 12 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-2.2
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W3.5
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-3.5
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W4.0

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline data up to Week 12. Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-7.1
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-12.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-2.5
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-16.0

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data. All post-baseline data available up to Week 12 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W9.8
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-33.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W2.8
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-34.7

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Estimand

Adjusted least square (LS) means and standard errors (SE) were obtained from mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) model. All post-baseline data available up to Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W9.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-33.6
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-4.4
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-38.2

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data. All post-baseline data available up to Week 12 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W10.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-34.8
DB Period: Placebo Q4W2.3
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-39.2

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data. All post-baseline data available up to Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W9.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-31.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-3.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-35.6

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data. All post-baseline data available up to Week 12 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W7.5
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-25.3
DB Period: Placebo Q4W0.9
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-27.0

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Week 12 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data for Q4W. All available post-baseline data up to Week 12 were included in the imputation model. For Q2W, adjusted percentages at Week 12 were obtained from last observation carried forward approach (LOCF) to handle missing on-treatment LDL-C values as well as missing post-treatment LDL-C values in participants who discontinued treatment due to the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic. Other post-treatment missing values were considered as failure. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.0
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W61.2
DB Period: Placebo Q4W4.3
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W57.0

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 30 Percent (%) Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Weeks 12 and 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data followed by logistic regression model. All available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24 were included in the imputation model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W65.866.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W70.872.5
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.84.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W4.218.5

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for those who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-12.746-14.748
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-16.042-22.418
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-7.0990.492
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-2.5452.468

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 day otherwise. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and at one on-treatment post-baseline value for a timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W3.55.6
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W4.03.4
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-2.2-0.8
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-3.5-1.1

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for those who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-2.211.9
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-0.3-6.8
DB Period: Placebo Q2W6.57.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W7.812.2

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and at one on-treatment post-baseline value for a timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-30.0-27.4
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-31.7-34.3
DB Period: Placebo Q2W8.910.4
DB Period: Placebo Q4W1.1-3.6

[back to top]

DB Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Positive Anti-Alirocumab Antibodies (ADA) Response

Anti-drug (alirocumab) antibodies samples were analyzed using a validated non-quantitative, titer-based bridging immunoassay. Number of participants with positive ADA during 24-week treatment period is reported. Treatment-emergent positive ADA response was defined as 1) participants with no ADA positive response at baseline but with any positive response in the post-baseline period or 2) participants with a positive ADA response at baseline and at least a 4- fold increase in titer in the post-baseline period. A persistent positive response was defined as a TE ADA positive response detected in at least 2 consecutive post-baseline samples separated by at least a 12-week period. Persistent positive response was only analyzed for participants with positive TE ADA response. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TE ADA positive responsePersistent positive response
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W30

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol < 130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Weeks 12 and 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data followed by logistic regression model. All available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24 were included in the imputation model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for those who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W70.673.3
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W72.676.3
DB Period: Placebo Q2W16.48.0
Db Period: Placebo Q4W12.922.2

[back to top]

DB Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Positive Anti-Alirocumab Antibodies (ADA) Response

Anti-drug (alirocumab) antibodies samples were analyzed using a validated non-quantitative, titer-based bridging immunoassay. Number of participants with positive ADA during 24-week treatment period is reported. Treatment-emergent positive ADA response was defined as 1) participants with no ADA positive response at baseline but with any positive response in the post-baseline period or 2) participants with a positive ADA response at baseline and at least a 4- fold increase in titer in the post-baseline period. A persistent positive response was defined as a TE ADA positive response detected in at least 2 consecutive post-baseline samples separated by at least a 12-week period. Persistent positive response was only analyzed for participants with positive TE ADA response. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TE ADA positive response
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W0
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W0

[back to top]

DB Period: Absolute Change From Baseline in Apo B/Apo A-1 Ratio at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and at one on-treatment post-baseline value for a timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24

,,,
Interventionratio (Apo B/Apo A-1) (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-0.2-0.2
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-0.3-0.3
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.10.1
DB Period: Placebo Q4W0.00.0

[back to top]

DB Period: Absolute Change From Baseline in Apo B/Apo A-1 Ratio at Weeks 12 and 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24

,,,
Interventionratio (Apo B/Apo A-1) (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-0.2-0.2
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-0.3-0.3
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.10.1
DB Period: Placebo Q4W0.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cogstate Battery Test - Overall Composite Score at Weeks 24, 68 and 104

Cogstate battery test (cognitive testing system) consisted of detection test (DET), identification test (IDN), one card learning test (OCL) and Groton maze learning test (GML) to assess processing speed, attention, visual learning and executive functioning, respectively. For each test, Z-scores were computed based on participant's age at Baseline and Weeks 24, 68 and 104. Composite score: calculated as mean of Z-scores equally weighted, provided that at least 3 of 4 tests were available and if all of these domains were covered as: attention, through either DET or IDN, visual learning, through OCL and executive function, through GML. There is not minimum/maximum since values were reported as z-score but z-score of 0 means result equals to mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than mean and positive values higher. Positive change in z-score = an improvement in cognition, i.e., a better outcome; and negative change in z-score = worsening in cognition, i.e., a worse outcome. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24, 68 and 104

,,,
InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Week 24Week 68Week 104
Alirocumab Q2W-0.313-0.334-0.439
Alirocumab Q4W-0.136-0.263-0.638
Placebo/Alirocumab Q2W-0.403-0.421-0.601
Placebo/Alirocumab Q4W-0.218-0.272-0.393

[back to top]

OL Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 104: On-treatment Estimand

Percent Change in LDL-C from Baseline to Week 104 was reported in this outcome measure. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
OL Period: Placebo/Alirocumab Q2W-22.8
OL Period: Alirocumab Q2W-25.8
OL Period: Placebo/Alirocumab Q4W-27.6
OL Period: Alirocumab Q4W-23.4

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Weeks 8, 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 8, Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 8, 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 8Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-35.4-34.8-33.6
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-42.0-39.2-38.2
DB Period: Placebo Q2W7.110.79.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-3.82.3-4.4

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data. All post-baseline data available up to Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W7.4
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-23.4
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-4.4
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-27.7

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline data available up to Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-0.1
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W1.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-4.5
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W4.4

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline data available up to Week 12 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-0.1
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-1.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-0.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W5.0

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data. All post-baseline data available up to Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and a post-baseline value for at least one timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W10.4
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-27.4
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-3.6
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-34.3

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieved at Least 30% Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Weeks 12 and 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data followed by logistic regression model. All available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24 were included in the imputation model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for those who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W65.866.7
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W70.872.5
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.84.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W4.218.5

[back to top]

OL Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 104: ITT Estimand

Percent Change in LDL-C from Baseline to Week 104 was reported in this outcome measure. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
OL Period: Placebo/Alirocumab Q2W-23.3
OL Period: Alirocumab Q2W-22.2
OL Period: Placebo/Alirocumab Q4W-27.1
OL Period: Alirocumab Q4W-23.7

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level Lower Than (<) 130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data up to Week 24 were included in the imputation model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W8.0
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W73.3
DB Period: Placebo Q4W22.2
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W76.3

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and at one on-treatment post-baseline value for a timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-33.0-31.0
Db Period: Alirocumab Q4W-34.7-35.6
DB Period: Placebo Q2W9.89.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W2.8-3.7

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM mode, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and at one on-treatment post-baseline value for a timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-1.71.0
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W5.04.4
DB Period: Placebo Q2W-0.1-0.1
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-0.7-4.5

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and at one on-treatment post-baseline value for a timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-25.3-23.4
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-27.0-27.7
DB Period: Placebo Q2W7.57.4
DB Period: Placebo Q4W0.9-4.4

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Weeks 8, 12 and 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline data available up to Week 8, Week 12 and Week 24 were used and missing data were accounted for by the MMRM model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 8, 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 8Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-35.4-34.8-33.6
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-42.0-39.2-38.2
DB Period: Placebo Q2W7.110.79.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W-3.82.3-4.4

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50% Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Weeks 12 and 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data followed by logistic regression model. All available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24 were included in the imputation model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W25.221.6
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W31.932.4
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.00.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W0.19.1

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50% Reduction in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Weeks 12 and 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data followed by logistic regression model. All available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24 were included in the imputation model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for those who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W25.221.6
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W31.932.4
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.00.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W0.19.1

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol < 110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Weeks 12 and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Weeks 12 and 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data followed by logistic regression model. All available post-baseline on-treatment data up to Week 12 and Week 24 were included in the imputation model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for those who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Weeks 12 and 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W61.757.2
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W57.067.2
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.14.0
DB Period: Placebo Q4W4.39.0

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Weeks 12, and 24: On-treatment Estimand

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM model. All post-baseline on-treatment data available up to Week 12 and Week 24 were used for the MMRM model, i.e., for Q2W data: from 1st investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection up to last IMP injection + 21 days and for Q4W data: from 1st IMP injection up to last IMP injection + 35 days for who stopped IMP before switch to Q2W regimen, + 21 days otherwise. MMRM model was run on participants with a Baseline value and at one on-treatment post-baseline value for a timepoint used in the model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-34.8-33.6
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-39.2-38.2
DB Period: Placebo Q2W10.79.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W2.3-4.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Tanner Staging at Baseline and Weeks 24, 68 and 104

Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development in children and adolescent based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. Participants were evaluated for pubic hair distribution, breast development (only females) and genital development (only males) and classified in 3 categories as: Prepubescent (defined as a person just before start of the development of adult sexual characteristics), Pubescent (defined as a person at or approaching the age of puberty), Postpubescent (sexually mature or a person who has completed puberty). (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24, 68 and 104

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline: Boys - PrepubescentBaseline: Boys - PubescentBaseline: Boys - PostpubescentBaseline: Girls - PrepubescentBaseline: Girls - PubescentBaseline: Girls - PostpubescentWeek 24: Boys - PrepubescentWeek 24: Boys - PubescentWeek 24: Boys - PostpubescentWeek 24: Girls - PrepubescentWeek 24: Girls - PubescentWeek 24: Girls - PostpubescentWeek 68: Boys - PrepubescentWeek 68: Boys - PubescentWeek 68: Boys - PostpubescentWeek 68: Girls - PrepubescentWeek 68: Girls - PubescentWeek 68: Girls - PostpubescentWeek 104: Boys - PrepubescentWeek 104: Boys - PubescentWeek 104: Boys - PostpubescentWeek 104: Girls - PrepubescentWeek 104: Girls - PubescentWeek 104: Girls - Postpubescent
Alirocumab Q2W41324161031134159196314918601011
Alirocumab Q4W01447131401252169096116908711711
Placebo/Alirocumab Q2W11331610134152074061067042
Placebo/Alirocumab Q4W543186173165153155152155

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level <130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 12: ITT Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Week 12 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data up to Week 12 were included in the imputation model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W16.4
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W70.6
DB Period: Placebo Q4W12.9
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W72.6

[back to top]

DB Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted means and standard errors were obtained from a multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline data up to Week 24. Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W0.5
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W-14.7
DB Period: Placebo Q4W2.5
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W-22.4

[back to top]

DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 24: ITT Estimand

Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data up to Week 24 were included in the imputation model. (NCT03510884)
Timeframe: At Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DB Period: Placebo Q2W4.0
DB Period: Alirocumab Q2W57.2
DB Period: Placebo Q4W9.0
DB Period: Alirocumab Q4W67.2

[back to top]

Change in Pre- and Post-phosphocreatine Relaxation Time

Measure differences in pre- and post-phosphocreatine relaxation time in SAMS (Statin Associated Muscle Symptoms) patients on simvastatin compared to placebo. (NCT04575090)
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 Weeks

Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
Experimental: Arm 2 (Interventional Experimental Arm)5.58
Experimental: Arm 3 (Interventional Control Arm)5.083

[back to top]