Page last updated: 2024-12-10

travoprost

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Travoprost: A cloprostenol derivative that is used as an ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT in the treatment of OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA and OCULAR HYPERTENSION. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

travoprost : The isopropyl ester of prostaglandin F2alpha in which the pentyl group is replaced by a 3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxymethyl group. A synthetic analogue of prostaglandin F2alpha, ophthalmic solutions of travoprost are used as a topical medication for controlling the progression of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension, by reducing intraocular pressure. It is a pro-drug; the isopropyl ester group is hydrolysed by esterases in the cornea to the biologically active free acid, fluprostenol. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID5282226
CHEMBL ID1200799
CHEBI ID746859
SCHEMBL ID93818
MeSH IDM0403483

Synonyms (91)

Synonym
AC-6103
(((1r)-(1alpha(z),2beta(1e,3r*),3alpha,5alpha))-7-(3,5-dihydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-(3-trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)-1-butenyl)cyclopentyl)-5-heptenoic acid, 1-methylethyl ester
(1r-(1alpha(z),2beta(1e,3r*),3alpha,5alpha))-7-(3,5-dihydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)-1-butenyl)cyclopentyl)-5-heptenoic acid, 1-methylethyl ester
travatan z
al-6221
5-heptenoic acid, 7-((1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-((1e,3r)-3-hydroxy-4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)-1-butenyl)cyclopentyl)-, 1-methylethyl ester, (5z)-
travatan
(+)-fluprostenol isopropyl ester
travoprost [usan]
(z)-7-((1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-((1e,3r)-3-hydroxy-4-((alpha,alpha,alpha-trifluoro-m-isopropyl-tolyl)oxy)-1-butenyl)cyclopentyl)-5-heptenoate
5-heptenoic acid, 7-(3,5-dihydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)-1-butenyl)cyclopentyl)-, 1-methylethyl ester, (1r-(1alpha(z),2beta(1e,3r*),3alpha,5alpha))-
travatanz
travoprost
DB00287
isopropyl (z)-7-((1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-{(1e,3r)-3-hydroxy-4-[(alpha,alpha,alpha-trifluoro-m-tolyl)oxy]-1-butenyl}cyclopentyl)-5-heptenoate
travatan (tn)
D01964
157283-68-6
travoprost (jan/usp/inn)
CHEBI:746859 ,
travoprostum
propan-2-yl (5z)-7-[(1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-{(1e,3r)-3-hydroxy-4-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]but-1-en-1-yl}cyclopentyl]hept-5-enoate
CHEMBL1200799
otx-tp
nsc-760366
propan-2-yl (z)-7-[(1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-[(e,3r)-3-hydroxy-4-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]but-1-enyl]cyclopentyl]hept-5-enoate
S3738
unii-wj68r08kx9
travoprost [usan:usp:inn:ban]
wj68r08kx9 ,
nsc 760366
izba
AM84515
gtpl7102
propan-2-yl (5z)-7-[(1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-[(1e,3r)-3-hydroxy-4-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]but-1-en-1-yl]cyclopentyl]hept-5-enoate
travoprost [orange book]
travoprost component of duotrav
travoprost [mart.]
travoprost [inn]
duotrav component travoprost
travoprost [usp-rs]
travoprost [mi]
travoprost [jan]
isopropyl (z)-7-((1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-((1e,3r)-3-hydroxy-4-((.alpha.,.alpha.,.alpha.-trifluoro-m-tolyl)oxy)-1-butenyl)cyclopentyl)-5-heptenoate
(1r-(1.alpha.(z),2.beta.(1e,3r*),3.alpha.,5.alpha.))-7-(3,5-dihydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)-1-butenyl)cyclopentyl)-5-heptenoic acid, 1-methylethyl ester
travoprost [vandf]
travoprost [usp monograph]
travoprost [who-dd]
travoprost [ema epar]
HY-B0584
SCHEMBL93818
(z)-isopropyl 7-((1r,2r)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-((s,e)-3-hydroxy-4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)but-1-en-1-yl)cyclopentyl)hept-5-enoate
J-502633
isopropyl (z)-7-((1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-((3r,e)-3-hydroxy-4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)-phenoxy)-but-1-enyl)-cyclopentyl)-hept-5-enoate
(z)-isopropyl 7-((1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-((r,e)-3-hydroxy-4-(3-(trifluoromethyl) phenoxy)but-1-en-1-yl)cyclopentyl)hept-5-enoate
(z)-isopropyl 7-((1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-((r,e)-3-hydroxy-4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)but-1-en-1-yl)cyclopentyl)hept-5-enoate
travaprost
(5z)-7-[(1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-[(1e,3r)-3-hydroxy-4-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-1-buten-1-yl]cyclopentyl]-5-heptenoic acid 1-methyethyl ester
AKOS024458039
sr-01000942266
SR-01000942266-1
EX-A1772
bdbm50248302
DTXSID80896948 ,
BS-15509
Q2193376
sr-01000946860
SR-01000946860-1
5-heptenoic acid, 7-[(1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-[(1e,3r)-3-hydroxy-4-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-1-buten-1-yl]cyclopentyl]-, 1-methylethyl ester, (5z)-
CCG-269692
NCGC00346741-02
(z)-isopropyl7-((1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-((r,e)-3-hydroxy-4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)but-1-en-1-yl)cyclopentyl)hept-5-enoate
travoprostintermediates
EN300-21831206
travoprost in bulk
fluprostenol isopropyl ester;al6221;flu-ipr
travoprost ophthalmic solution, 0.004%
travoprost ophthalmic solution usp, 0.004%travoprost
dtxcid401326382
propan-2-yl (5z)-7-((1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-((1e,3r)-3-hydroxy-4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)but-1-en-1-yl)cyclopentyl)hept-5-enoate
travoprost (usp monograph)
travoprost (mart.)
isopropyl (5z)-7-((1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-((1e,3r)-3-hydroxy-4-(3- (trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)but-1-enyl)cyclopentyl)hept-5-enoate
travoprost (usan:usp:inn:ban)
travoprost ophthalmic solution
s01ee04
travoprost ophthalmic solution usp, 0.004%
isopropyl (z)-7-((1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-((1e,3r)-3-hydroxy-4-((alpha,alpha,alpha-trifluoro-m-tolyl)oxy)-1-butenyl)cyclopentyl)-5-heptenoate
travoprost ophthalmic
5-heptenoic acid, 7-((1r,2r,3r,5s)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-((1e,3r)-3-hydroxy-4-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)-1-butenyl)cyclopentyl)-, 1-methylethyl ester,(5z)-
travoprost (usp-rs)

Research Excerpts

Overview

Travoprost is a synthetic ester prodrug of a prostaglandin F(2alpha) analogue used in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. It is a safe drug, with local side effects including hyperemia, eyelash growth and iris color change.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Travoprost is a synthetic prostaglandin F2α analogue used in treatment of glaucoma. "( Nanoemulsion as a feasible and biocompatible carrier for ocular delivery of travoprost: Improved pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties.
Ismail, A; Nasr, M; Sammour, O, 2020
)
2.23
"Travoprost is a prostaglandin analog used in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. "( Hypertrichosis of the upper cheek area associated with travoprost treatment of glaucoma.
Olver, JM; Ortiz-Perez, S,
)
1.82
"Travoprost BAK-free is an effective option for IOP reduction while avoiding BAK exposure."( Comparison of a travoprost BAK-free formulation preserved with polyquaternium-1 with BAK-preserved travoprost in ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma.
Coote, M; Denis, P; Gandolfi, S; Goldberg, I; Paredes, T; Pillai, MR; Stalmans, I; Volksone, L; Wells, A,
)
1.2
"Travoprost is a synthetic ester prodrug of a prostaglandin F(2alpha) analogue used in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. "( Travoprost.
Jarvis, B; Waugh, J, 2002
)
3.2
"Travoprost is a safe drug, with local side effects including hyperemia, eyelash growth and iris color change."( Travoprost: a potent ocular hypotensive agent.
Al-Jazzaf, AM; DeSantis, L; Netland, PA, 2003
)
2.48
"Travoprost is a promising ocular hypotensive prostaglandin FP derivative that has the ocular hypotensive efficacy of PGF2alpha isopropyl ester but with less severe ocular side effects."( Preclinical efficacy of travoprost, a potent and selective FP prostaglandin receptor agonist.
Dean, TR; Desantis, L; Hellberg, MR; McLaughlin, MA; Sallee, VL; Sharif, NA; Zinke, PW, 2001
)
1.34
"Travoprost is a very stable compound, maintaining its efficacy following exposure to extremely low and high temperatures, repeated freezing and thawing and exposure to light."( Travoprost--a new prostaglandin analogue for the treatment of glaucoma.
Whitson, JT, 2002
)
2.48

Effects

Travoprost has demonstrated preferential affinity and full agonist activity for the FP receptor in the nanomolar range, with no meaningful affinity or activity at other receptors. It is widely used for the treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OH) Travopst has similar effect as latanoprost in reducing the IOP in glau coma patients with relatively low IOPs.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Travoprost has been widely used for the treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OH). "( Intraocular pressure lowering efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% as a replacement therapy in patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Chen, XM; Ge, J; Li, B; Sun, XH; Wang, NL; Wang, ZX; Wu, LL; Zhao, JL, 2010
)
2.05
"Travoprost has similar effect as latanoprost in reducing the IOP in glaucoma patients with relatively low IOPs. "( Randomized crossover study of latanoprost and travoprost in eyes with open-angle glaucoma.
Sawada, A; Takatsuka, N; Yamamoto, T, 2012
)
2.08
"Travoprost has demonstrated preferential affinity and full agonist activity for the FP receptor in the nanomolar range, with no meaningful affinity or activity at other receptors."( Travoprost: a potent ocular hypotensive agent.
Al-Jazzaf, AM; DeSantis, L; Netland, PA, 2003
)
2.48
"Travoprost without BAK has similar IOP-lowering efficacy and safety compared with travoprost preserved with BAK. "( Duration of IOP reduction with travoprost BAK-free solution.
Dubiner, HB; Gross, RL; Ochsner, KI; Peace, JH; Smith, SE; Walters, TR; Weiss, MJ,
)
1.86

Actions

Travoprost may cause significantly short-term conjunctival hyperaemia even after a single dose in the eyes of healthy African subjects.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Travoprost can increase activity of MMP1/2 gradually."( Impact of combination use of 0.004% travoprost and 2% pilocarpine on matrix metalloproteinases synthesized by rabbit ciliary muscle: a pilot study.
Zhang, SH; Zhao, JL, 2013
)
1.39
"Travoprost seems to lower IOP by increasing trabecular outflow facility. "( Effects of travoprost on aqueous humor dynamics in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.
Bergamini, MV; Camras, CB; Dickerson, JE; Fan, S; Landry, TA; Toris, CB; Zhan, G, 2007
)
2.17
"Travoprost may cause significantly short-term conjunctival hyperaemia even after a single dose in the eyes of healthy African subjects."( Conjunctival hyperaemia and other ocular adverse effects on healthy African subjects after single dosing with 0.004% Travoprost.
Adedapo, AD; Adeoti, CO; Ashaye, AO; Olusanya, BA, 2007
)
1.27
"Travoprost produced a lower incidence of ocular irritation than PGF20 isopropyl ester at a dose of 1 microg in the New Zealand albino (NZA) rabbit."( Preclinical efficacy of travoprost, a potent and selective FP prostaglandin receptor agonist.
Dean, TR; Desantis, L; Hellberg, MR; McLaughlin, MA; Sallee, VL; Sharif, NA; Zinke, PW, 2001
)
1.34

Treatment

Travoprost treatment leads to SC lumen expansion accompanied by a drop of IOP in the healthy eye. Travopst-treated patients' IOP levels were reduced 8.7 and 8.1 mm Hg at 8 and 10 AM, respectively.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"In travoprost-treated eyes, a statistically significant correlation between SC area and IOP is observed (r = -0.2817; P = 0.0004)."( Expansion of Schlemm's canal by travoprost in healthy subjects determined by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.
Chen, J; Chen, X; Huang, H; Sun, X; Zhang, S, 2013
)
1.19
"Travoprost treatment leads to SC lumen expansion accompanied by a drop of IOP in the healthy eye, likely as a result of the enhancement of pressure sensitive trabecular meshwork outflow induced by travoprost."( Expansion of Schlemm's canal by travoprost in healthy subjects determined by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.
Chen, J; Chen, X; Huang, H; Sun, X; Zhang, S, 2013
)
1.39
"Travoprost-treated patients had a smaller predicted change in visual field defect score (VFDS) than latanoprost-treated patients and timolol-treated patients, and significantly fewer were expected to demonstrate visual field progression."( Projected impact of travoprost versus both timolol and latanoprost on visual field deficit progression and costs among black glaucoma subjects.
Covert, DW; Halpern, MT; Robin, AL, 2002
)
1.36
"Travoprost-treated eyes showed a significant (P<0.001) decrease in daytime IOP compared with baseline (26%) or to vehicle-treated eyes (22%), and an increase in daytime outflow facility (P=0.001; 64%). "( Effects of travoprost on aqueous humor dynamics in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.
Bergamini, MV; Camras, CB; Dickerson, JE; Fan, S; Landry, TA; Toris, CB; Zhan, G, 2007
)
2.17
"Travoprost-treated patients' IOP levels were reduced 8.7 and 8.1 mm Hg at 8 and 10 AM, respectively."( The effect of latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost on circadian variation of intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma.
Gultekin, S; Sahin, A; Yildirim, N,
)
1.11
"Treatment with travoprost with sofZia significantly lowered mean diurnal and nocturnal IOP levels from baseline (diurnal 18.1 ± 3.9 to 15.3 ± 3.3 mm Hg; nocturnal 20.6 ± 3.6 to 19.4 ± 3.4 mm Hg, P < .01 for both). "( The diurnal and nocturnal effect of travoprost with sofZia on intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure.
Kahook, MY; Seibold, LK, 2014
)
1.03
"Treatment with travoprost, 0.004%, was commenced at week 3 in the trial eye and at week 4 in the fellow eye."( Validity of the Monocular Trial of Intraocular Pressure-Lowering at Different Time Points in Patients Starting Topical Glaucoma Medication.
King, AJ; Rotchford, AP, 2016
)
0.77
"Treatment with travoprost did not affect CCT."( The effect of prostaglandin analogues on central corneal thickness of patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma: a 2-year study on 129 eyes.
Bafa, M; Georgopoulos, G; Mihas, C; Papaconstantinou, D; Stavrakas, P; Vergados, I, 2011
)
0.71
"Treatment with travoprost decreased IOP significantly and was associated with CCT thinning, which had little or no effect on actual IOP decrease. "( Relationship between travoprost and central corneal thickness in ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma.
Brady, M; Ennis, M; Gordon, KD; Harasymowycz, PJ; Papamatheakis, DG, 2007
)
1.01

Toxicity

Travoprost administered once daily was safe and well tolerated in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The most common treatment-related adverse events for the travoprost group were ocular hyperemia and eyelash growth. TNFalpha induced or stimulated expression of the three inflammatory markers.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Adverse events were recorded at each visit."( Concomitant administration of travoprost and brinzolamide versus fixed latanoprost/timolol combined therapy: three-month comparison of efficacy and safety.
Castillo, A; Fernandez-Vidal, A; Garcia-Feijoo, J; Garcia-Sanchez, J; Martinez-de-la-Casa, JM; Mendez-Hernandez, C, 2004
)
0.61
"To describe the adverse effect of abdominal cramp caused by travoprost ophthalmic solution in a glaucoma patient."( Abdominal cramp as an adverse effect of travoprost.
Lee, YC, 2005
)
0.84
" Based on the findings of dechallenge and rechallenge procedures, abdominal cramp should be considered a certain adverse effect of travoprost according to the WHO classification."( Abdominal cramp as an adverse effect of travoprost.
Lee, YC, 2005
)
0.8
" The impact on cellular viability and apoptosis in the same cell line was evaluated, to address the possible proinflammatory and/or toxic origin of the most frequent clinical impairments induced by prostanoids (i."( In vitro study of inflammatory potential and toxicity profile of latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost in conjunctiva-derived epithelial cells.
Baudouin, C; Brignole-Baudouin, F; Guenoun, JM; Pauly, A; Rat, P; Warnet, JM, 2005
)
0.56
"TNFalpha induced or stimulated expression of the three inflammatory markers, whereas the PGF2alpha, latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost solutions did not induce an increase in these markers and even produced a marked reduction of ICAM-1 and PECAM-1 expression in those solutions most concentrated in BAC, thus suggesting a toxic phenomenon in cellular membranes induced by the preservative rather than the medication itself."( In vitro study of inflammatory potential and toxicity profile of latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost in conjunctiva-derived epithelial cells.
Baudouin, C; Brignole-Baudouin, F; Guenoun, JM; Pauly, A; Rat, P; Warnet, JM, 2005
)
0.77
" The adverse event profile for Trav/Tim was comparable to Trav or Tim alone."( The safety and efficacy of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination ophthalmic solution.
Barnebey, HS; Bergamini, MV; Flowers, BE; Landry, TA; Mallick, S; Orengo-Nania, S; Samples, J, 2005
)
0.63
" The clinical results that Trav/Tim was safe and well tolerated with an incidence of adverse events was comparable to the results of Trav or Tim alone."( The safety and efficacy of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination ophthalmic solution.
Barnebey, HS; Bergamini, MV; Flowers, BE; Landry, TA; Mallick, S; Orengo-Nania, S; Samples, J, 2005
)
0.63
" The most frequent ocular adverse event was hyperemia that occurred in 14."( Efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution once daily for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Bergamini, MV; Henry, JC; Katz, GJ; Landry, TA; Lewis, RA; Mallick, S; Robertson, SM; Schuman, JS; Sullivan, EK; Wells, DT, 2005
)
0.59
" The most important adverse events for the prostaglandin derivatives were conjunctival hyperemia, eyelashes pigmentation and growth, iris pigmentation."( Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of latanoprost, travoprost and the fixed combination timolol-dorzolamide; a prospective, randomized, masked, cross-over design study.
Antohi, I; Chiseliţă, D; Danielescu, C; Medvichi, R, 2005
)
0.57
" Both volunteered and elicited reports of adverse events were collected; all patients who were randomized and received > or =1 dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis."( A 6-week, double-masked, parallel-group study of the efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% compared with latanoprost 0:005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Cunliffe, IA; Franks, WA; Renard, JP; Rojanapongpun, P, 2006
)
0.56
" Adverse events related to therapy were mild in nature, and there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 treatment groups."( A 6-week, double-masked, parallel-group study of the efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% compared with latanoprost 0:005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Cunliffe, IA; Franks, WA; Renard, JP; Rojanapongpun, P, 2006
)
0.56
" Common adverse events were mild and included ocular hyperaemia, dysgeusia and eye irritation."( Ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of brinzolamide ophthalmic suspension 1% added to travoprost ophthalmic solution 0.004% therapy in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Franks, W, 2006
)
0.56
" There was no significant difference for any adverse event between groups (p>0."( The efficacy and safety of timolol maleate versus brinzolamide each given twice daily added to travoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma.
Berta, A; Chiselita, D; Cvenkel, B; Holló, G; Izgi, B; Liehneova, I; Petkova, N; Stewart, WC; Szaflik, J; Turacli, E,
)
0.35
" Adverse events and the number of patients discontinued owing to adverse events were similar for both treatment groups."( Travoprost 0.004% with and without benzalkonium chloride: a comparison of safety and efficacy.
Bergamini, MV; Dickerson, JE; Hua, SY; James, JE; Katz, GJ; Landry, TA; Lewis, RA; Montgomery, DB; Sullivan, EK; Weiss, MJ; Wells, DT, 2007
)
1.78
" Treatment-related adverse events were mild in both groups."( A 1-year study to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% to once-daily latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Andrew, R; Danesh-Meyer, H; Kozobolis, V; Melamed, S; Topouzis, F; Wells, AP; Wells, D; Wieland, H,
)
0.37
"5% fixed combination ophthalmic solution is an effective treatment for reducing IOP and it is safe and well-tolerated in patients with OAG or OH."( A 1-year study to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% to once-daily latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Andrew, R; Danesh-Meyer, H; Kozobolis, V; Melamed, S; Topouzis, F; Wells, AP; Wells, D; Wieland, H,
)
0.37
" Adverse effects were assessed and conjunctival hyperemia was graded using a standardized scale."( Efficacy and safety of a systematic switch from latanoprost to travoprost in patients with glaucoma.
Aung, T; Ho, CL; Hoh, ST; Istiantoro, VW; Kumar, RS; Oen, FT,
)
0.37
"We observed conjunctival hyperemia as the most common side effect of bimatoprost and travoprost."( Comparison of ocular surface side effects of topical travoprost and bimatoprost.
Alagöz, G; Bayer, A; Boran, C; Elçioğlu, M; Kükner, A; Serin, D, 2008
)
0.82
" Safety measures included adverse events, biomicroscopy, visual acuity, heart rate, and blood pressure."( Ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% in inadequately controlled primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: short-term, multicenter, prospective study.
Blini, M; Curatola, MR; David, A; Merlo, G; Radaelli, R; Ratiglia, R; Rossi, GC; Trabucchi, G, 2009
)
0.62
" No drug related serious adverse events were reported during the study."( Ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% in inadequately controlled primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: short-term, multicenter, prospective study.
Blini, M; Curatola, MR; David, A; Merlo, G; Radaelli, R; Ratiglia, R; Rossi, GC; Trabucchi, G, 2009
)
0.62
" This retrospective study found travoprost to have minimal adverse events in children and to reduce IOP in select cases of pediatric glaucoma."( Travoprost in children: adverse effects and intraocular pressure response.
Enyedi, LB; Freedman, SF; Schotthoeffer, EO; Yanovitch, TL, 2009
)
2.08
"To document patient/physician perceptions of adverse effects and their relationship to medication changes among patients prescribed prostaglandin analogs."( The impact of ocular adverse effects in patients treated with topical prostaglandin analogs: changes in prescription patterns and patient persistence.
Gelb, L; Hahn, SR; Kim, EE; Tan, H; Zimmerman, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Frequency of adverse effects noted by physicians and associations with medication change decisions were examined in charted data."( The impact of ocular adverse effects in patients treated with topical prostaglandin analogs: changes in prescription patterns and patient persistence.
Gelb, L; Hahn, SR; Kim, EE; Tan, H; Zimmerman, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Adverse effects were the second most common reasons noted by physicians for switching medications after lack of efficacy (19% vs."( The impact of ocular adverse effects in patients treated with topical prostaglandin analogs: changes in prescription patterns and patient persistence.
Gelb, L; Hahn, SR; Kim, EE; Tan, H; Zimmerman, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
"Ocular adverse effects, particularly hyperemia, negatively affect patient continuation with therapy and switching."( The impact of ocular adverse effects in patients treated with topical prostaglandin analogs: changes in prescription patterns and patient persistence.
Gelb, L; Hahn, SR; Kim, EE; Tan, H; Zimmerman, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
"Latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost are prostaglandin or prostamide-type ocular hypotensive medications, all of which are effective and safe for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP)."( Prostaglandin efficacy and safety study undertaken by race (the PRESSURE study).
Ahmed, II; Birt, CM; Buys, YM; Trope, GE, 2010
)
0.73
" No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in this study."( Intraocular pressure lowering efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% as a replacement therapy in patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Chen, XM; Ge, J; Li, B; Sun, XH; Wang, NL; Wang, ZX; Wu, LL; Zhao, JL, 2010
)
0.61
" Travoprost administered once daily was safe and well tolerated in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension."( Intraocular pressure lowering efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% as a replacement therapy in patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Chen, XM; Ge, J; Li, B; Sun, XH; Wang, NL; Wang, ZX; Wu, LL; Zhao, JL, 2010
)
1.52
" We present 2 cases of a newly described side effect of both these topical agents in terms of periorbital fat atrophy."( Periorbital fat atrophy - an unfamiliar side effect of prostaglandin analogues.
Ghazi-Nouri, S; Jayaprakasam, A, 2010
)
0.36
" No serious adverse event was found in both the groups."( A 12-week, double-masked, parallel-group study of the safety and efficacy of travoprost 0.004% compared with pilocarpine 1% in Chinese patients with primary angle-closure and primary angle-closure glaucoma.
Gao, YX; Huang, P; Li, B; Wang, ZX; Wu, LL, 2011
)
0.6
"004% once daily is safe and well tolerated in PAC or PACG patients."( A 12-week, double-masked, parallel-group study of the safety and efficacy of travoprost 0.004% compared with pilocarpine 1% in Chinese patients with primary angle-closure and primary angle-closure glaucoma.
Gao, YX; Huang, P; Li, B; Wang, ZX; Wu, LL, 2011
)
0.6
" The most common drug-related adverse event was hyperemia of the eye (ocular hyperemia and conjunctival hyperemia combined), occurring in 11."( Travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5%-fixed combination with and without benzalkonium chloride: a prospective, randomized, doubled-masked comparison of safety and efficacy.
Bae, K; Iwamoto, Y; Kitazawa, Y; Kotake, S; Sasaki, N; Smith, P, 2011
)
1.81
" The gastro-intestinal effects are among the most reported adverse effects upon topical application of PGAs."( Possible mechanism for the gastro-intestinal adverse effects upon topical application of Prostaglandin F₂α analogs.
Cai, S; Li, X; Liu, X; Yan, N; Zhou, X, 2013
)
0.39
" Mild ocular redness was the commonest side effect in both the groups but was not significant in either group."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bimatoprost (0.03 %) and travoprost (0.004 %) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma.
Chander, A; Kapoor, H; Thomas, S,
)
0.37
"Both drugs lowered IOP effectively but bimatoprost showed a greater reduction in the mean IOP than did travoprost at 12 weeks and both are safe for ocular use."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bimatoprost (0.03 %) and travoprost (0.004 %) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma.
Chander, A; Kapoor, H; Thomas, S,
)
0.58
" The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were conjunctival hyperemia in the travoprost/timolol group, and dry eye and foreign body sensation in the dorzolamide/timolol group."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of fixed combination travoprost/timolol and dorzolamide/ timolol in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Andreić, V; Babić, N; Grković, D; Jovanović, P; Miljković, A,
)
0.6
"Both LT and TT are safe and effective for the treatment of OHT associated with uveitis and greater IOP reduction may be achieved by TT than by LT treatment."( Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Latanoprost/Timolol versus Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combinations for Ocular Hypertension Associated with Uveitis.
Kanda, T; Mine, I; Sakurai, Y; Shibata, M; Taguchi, M; Takeuchi, M, 2017
)
0.69
" The most common treatment-related adverse events for the travoprost group were ocular hyperemia and eyelash growth."( A 3-month safety and efficacy study of travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution compared with timolol in pediatric patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Aljasim, LA; Bradfield, Y; Dixon, ER; Feldman, R; Gustafson, N; Landry, T; Salem, C; Venkataraman, S, 2017
)
0.97
" Travoprost was well-tolerated, and no treatment-related systemic adverse events were reported."( A 3-month safety and efficacy study of travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution compared with timolol in pediatric patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Aljasim, LA; Bradfield, Y; Dixon, ER; Feldman, R; Gustafson, N; Landry, T; Salem, C; Venkataraman, S, 2017
)
1.63
" A major challenge in the treatment is the occurrence of adverse events and poor adherence."( The use of benzalkonium chloride in topical glaucoma treatment: An investigation of the efficacy and safety of benzalkonium chloride-preserved intraocular pressure-lowering eye drops and their effect on conjunctival goblet cells.
Nagstrup, AH, 2023
)
0.91

Dosage Studied

Adherence was measured with the Travalert Dosing Aid on 58 consecutive, regularly followed-up glaucoma patients already on self-administered travoprost. Participants who took 75% or fewer doses during an initial 3-month period were randomized into 2 groups.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Subjects who qualified at screening began a run-in period dosing timolol twice daily for 3 weeks."( Evaluation of travoprost as adjunctive therapy in patients with uncontrolled intraocular pressure while using timolol 0.5%.
Davis, AA; Landry, T; Orengo-Nania, S; Silver, LH; Von Tress, M; Weiner, A, 2001
)
0.67
"We evaluated conjunctival hyperemia by a standard photographic measure at the slit lamp and by anterior segment photographs in healthy subjects after dosing for 5 days with latanoprost, bimatoprost, or travoprost."( Conjunctival hyperemia in healthy subjects after short-term dosing with latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost.
Jackson, AL; Kolker, AE; Leech, J; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 2003
)
0.72
" The dosing is once per day in the evening, and storage does not require refrigeration."( Travoprost: a potent ocular hypotensive agent.
Al-Jazzaf, AM; DeSantis, L; Netland, PA, 2003
)
1.76
"A single centered, active-controlled, three-period crossover comparison that evaluated conjunctival and corneal punctate staining, by grade and individual stains, in healthy subjects after dosing for five days in one eye with latanoprost, bimatoprost, or travoprost."( Corneal punctate staining with latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost in healthy subjects.
Jackson, AL; Jenkins, JN; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 2003
)
0.74
"33) or at 1 hour after dosing (latanoprost 23."( Corneal punctate staining with latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost in healthy subjects.
Jackson, AL; Jenkins, JN; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 2003
)
0.56
" These agents are typically dosed once daily."( Comparison of the diurnal ocular hypotensive efficacy of travoprost and latanoprost over a 44-hour period in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.
Andrew, RM; Bergamini, MV; Darell Turner, F; Dubiner, HB; Landry, T; Przydryga, J; Robertson, S; Silver, LH; Sircy, MD; Weiner, A, 2004
)
0.57
" The following 5 different dosing protocols were studied: latanoprost with bimatoprost added, bimatoprost with latanoprost added, latanoprost with travoprost added, travoprost with latanoprost added, and latanoprost with a second dose of latanoprost added."( Additivity of bimatoprost or travoprost to latanoprost in glaucomatous monkey eyes.
Gagliuso, DJ; Mittag, TW; Podos, SM; Wang, RF, 2004
)
0.81
" This study demonstrates that the fixed combination of travoprost/timolol produces significant and clinically relevant reductions of IOP in a once-daily dosing regimen."( Efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution once daily for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Bergamini, MV; Henry, JC; Katz, GJ; Landry, TA; Lewis, RA; Mallick, S; Robertson, SM; Schuman, JS; Sullivan, EK; Wells, DT, 2005
)
0.83
"After a 6-week medicine-free period, 33 patients were randomized to receive travoprost dosed in the morning or evening."( 24-hour intraocular pressure control obtained with evening- versus morning-dosed travoprost in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Jenkins, JN; Kaltsos, K; Konstas, AG; Mikropoulos, D; Stewart, WC, 2006
)
0.79
" At 10 am, the evening dosing provided a statistically lower IOP (17."( 24-hour intraocular pressure control obtained with evening- versus morning-dosed travoprost in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Jenkins, JN; Kaltsos, K; Konstas, AG; Mikropoulos, D; Stewart, WC, 2006
)
0.56
" However, the evening dosing of travoprost demonstrates slightly greater daytime efficacy, with a narrower range of 24-hour pressure."( 24-hour intraocular pressure control obtained with evening- versus morning-dosed travoprost in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Jenkins, JN; Kaltsos, K; Konstas, AG; Mikropoulos, D; Stewart, WC, 2006
)
0.84
"5% ophthalmic solution dosed in the morning and evening."( A comparison of morning and evening instillation of a combination travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution.
Andrew, R; Denis, P; Friren, B; Wells, D,
)
0.37
"5% ophthalmic solution, dosed in the morning or evening, controlled IOP consistently throughout the day."( A comparison of morning and evening instillation of a combination travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution.
Andrew, R; Denis, P; Friren, B; Wells, D,
)
0.37
"To evaluate the recently introduced Travatan Dosing Aid (TDA) for its accuracy in recording and dispensing eyedrops."( Accuracy and performance of a commercially available Dosing Aid.
Cronin, TH; Kahook, MY; Lathrop, KL; Noecker, RJ, 2007
)
0.34
"005% (Xalatan) dosed once daily in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension."( Circadian IOP-lowering efficacy of travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution compared to latanoprost 0.005%.
Castillo, A; Fernández-Vidal, A; García-Feijoo, J; García-Sánchez, J; Martínez-de-la-Casa, JM; Méndez, C, 2006
)
0.61
" The TRAV group (n = 29) dosed once daily at 9:00 PM while the DTFC group (n = 27) dosed twice daily at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of travoprost with a fixed-combination of dorzolamide and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Batista, WD; da Silva, LJ; Figueiredo, CR; Franklin, LM; Netto, JA; Suzuki, ER, 2006
)
0.6
" A second group of animals was exposed to the medications through a dosing regimen of 1 drop/min (lpar3 drops total) (n=4/group)."( Assessment of corneal epithelial integrity after acute exposure to ocular hypotensive agents preserved with and without benzalkonium chloride.
Cavanagh, HD; Lakshman, N; Petroll, WM; Whitson, JT,
)
0.13
"Qualified patients at Visit 1 were placed on travoprost dosed every evening for 4 weeks and then were randomized at baseline (Visit 2) to the addition of timolol maleate or brinzolamide each given twice daily."( The efficacy and safety of timolol maleate versus brinzolamide each given twice daily added to travoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma.
Berta, A; Chiselita, D; Cvenkel, B; Holló, G; Izgi, B; Liehneova, I; Petkova, N; Stewart, WC; Szaflik, J; Turacli, E,
)
0.61
"This study describes patients' and physicians' perceptions of issues related to dosing adherence with topical therapies for lowering intraocular pressure before and after use of the travoprost dosing aid (Travatan Dosing Aid, Alcon Research Ltd."( Patients' and physicians' perceptions of the travoprost dosing aid: an open-label, multicenter study of adherence with prostaglandin analogue therapy for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Bergamini, MV; Berke, SJ; Day, D; Flowers, B; Landry, TA; Mallick, S; Piltz-Seymour, J; Smoot, TM; Teague, J; Wand, M, 2006
)
0.79
" In addition, each physician was asked to complete an entry and exit survey on each patient as well as a survey to provide feedback on the travoprost dosing aid."( Patients' and physicians' perceptions of the travoprost dosing aid: an open-label, multicenter study of adherence with prostaglandin analogue therapy for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Bergamini, MV; Berke, SJ; Day, D; Flowers, B; Landry, TA; Mallick, S; Piltz-Seymour, J; Smoot, TM; Teague, J; Wand, M, 2006
)
0.8
" Participating physicians perceived that problems involving dosing and adherence were reduced after patients used the dosing aid."( Patients' and physicians' perceptions of the travoprost dosing aid: an open-label, multicenter study of adherence with prostaglandin analogue therapy for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Bergamini, MV; Berke, SJ; Day, D; Flowers, B; Landry, TA; Mallick, S; Piltz-Seymour, J; Smoot, TM; Teague, J; Wand, M, 2006
)
0.59
"The travoprost dosing aid was perceived to be effective in reminding this group of patients to take their medication as prescribed."( Patients' and physicians' perceptions of the travoprost dosing aid: an open-label, multicenter study of adherence with prostaglandin analogue therapy for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Bergamini, MV; Berke, SJ; Day, D; Flowers, B; Landry, TA; Mallick, S; Piltz-Seymour, J; Smoot, TM; Teague, J; Wand, M, 2006
)
1.15
"004% without BAC (n=344) dosed once-daily each evening."( Travoprost 0.004% with and without benzalkonium chloride: a comparison of safety and efficacy.
Bergamini, MV; Dickerson, JE; Hua, SY; James, JE; Katz, GJ; Landry, TA; Lewis, RA; Montgomery, DB; Sullivan, EK; Weiss, MJ; Wells, DT, 2007
)
1.78
"To assess the accuracy of Travatan Dosing Aid recordings."( The TRAVATAN Dosing Aid accurately records when drops are taken.
Congdon, NG; Friedman, DS; Jampel, HD; Miller, R; Quigley, HA, 2007
)
0.34
"Physicians and patients used the Dosing Aid, and logs of usage were compared to the data obtained from the Dosing Aid."( The TRAVATAN Dosing Aid accurately records when drops are taken.
Congdon, NG; Friedman, DS; Jampel, HD; Miller, R; Quigley, HA, 2007
)
0.34
"The Dosing Aid accurately recorded most eyedrops administered by patients and physicians."( The TRAVATAN Dosing Aid accurately records when drops are taken.
Congdon, NG; Friedman, DS; Jampel, HD; Miller, R; Quigley, HA, 2007
)
0.34
"5% ophthalmic solution (Lat/Tim), dosed once daily in the morning, in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OH)."( A 1-year study to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% to once-daily latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Andrew, R; Danesh-Meyer, H; Kozobolis, V; Melamed, S; Topouzis, F; Wells, AP; Wells, D; Wieland, H,
)
0.37
" Conjunctival hyperaemia was evaluated clinically at 12, 24, 36 and 72 hours after dosing and volunteers reported all ocular adverse effects."( Conjunctival hyperaemia and other ocular adverse effects on healthy African subjects after single dosing with 0.004% Travoprost.
Adedapo, AD; Adeoti, CO; Ashaye, AO; Olusanya, BA, 2007
)
0.55
"Once-daily dosing of travoprost with sofZia produced significantly fewer corneal changes and less conjunctival inflammation than latanoprost preserved with BAK."( Comparison of corneal and conjunctival changes after dosing of travoprost preserved with sofZia, latanoprost with 0.02% benzalkonium chloride, and preservative-free artificial tears.
Kahook, MY; Noecker, RJ, 2008
)
0.9
" Patient dosing preference (a."( Comparison of morning versus evening dosing and 24-h post-dose efficacy of travoprost compared with latanoprost in patients with open-angle glaucoma .
Battista, RA; Haidich, AB; Konstas, AG; Yan, DB, 2008
)
0.58
"The mean IOP in the first period when all patients were dosed in the evening was assessed 12 h after dosing at 09:00 and it was similar in the two treatment groups (mean ± standard deviation: 17."( Comparison of morning versus evening dosing and 24-h post-dose efficacy of travoprost compared with latanoprost in patients with open-angle glaucoma .
Battista, RA; Haidich, AB; Konstas, AG; Yan, DB, 2008
)
0.58
"To evaluate the 24 h efficacy and safety of the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (TTFC) versus travoprost when both are dosed in the evening in primary open-angle glaucoma patients."( Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure control with the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination compared with travoprost when both are dosed in the evening in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Haidich, AB; Konstas, AG; Mikropoulos, D; Ntampos, KS; Stewart, WC, 2009
)
0.86
"This study suggests that when both drugs are dosed in the evening the TTFC provides improved intraocular pressure reduction, compared with travoprost, over the 24 h curve and for each individual time point in primary open-angle glaucoma patients."( Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure control with the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination compared with travoprost when both are dosed in the evening in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Haidich, AB; Konstas, AG; Mikropoulos, D; Ntampos, KS; Stewart, WC, 2009
)
0.8
" All subjects used the Travatan Dosing Aid (DA; Alcon, Fort Worth, TX) to administer travoprost as prescribed."( Adherence with topical glaucoma medication monitored electronically the Travatan Dosing Aid study.
Friedman, DS; Jampel, HD; Jiang, Y; Okeke, CO; Plyler, RJ; Quigley, HA; Ying, GS, 2009
)
0.58
" Patients were then treated with the opposite dosing regimen for 8 weeks and IOP measurements were repeated."( Intraocular pressure control over 24 hours using travoprost and timolol fixed combination administered in the morning or evening in primary open-angle and exfoliative glaucoma.
Konstas, AG; Nasr, MB; Nelson, LA; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC; Tsironi, S; Vakalis, AN, 2009
)
0.61
"Both morning and evening administration of TTFC provide effective 24-hour IOP reduction, but evening dosing demonstrates better 24-hour pressure control."( Intraocular pressure control over 24 hours using travoprost and timolol fixed combination administered in the morning or evening in primary open-angle and exfoliative glaucoma.
Konstas, AG; Nasr, MB; Nelson, LA; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC; Tsironi, S; Vakalis, AN, 2009
)
0.61
"Adherence was measured with the Travalert Dosing Aid on 58 consecutive, regularly followed-up glaucoma patients already on self-administered travoprost."( Personality traits, depression, and objectively measured adherence to once-daily prostaglandin analog medication in glaucoma.
Géczy, A; Holló, G; Kóthy, P; Vargha, P,
)
0.33
" All patients used the Travatan Dosing Aid (DA; Alcon Laboratories Inc."( Risk factors for poor adherence to eyedrops in electronically monitored patients with glaucoma.
Friedman, DS; Jampel, HD; Jiang, Y; Okeke, CO; Plyler, RJ; Quigley, HA; Ying, GS, 2009
)
0.35
"In an observational study, participants who took 75% or fewer doses (as measured using the travoprost Dosing Aid [DA]) during an initial 3-month period were randomized into 2 groups."( Interventions improve poor adherence with once daily glaucoma medications in electronically monitored patients.
Friedman, DS; Jampel, HD; Jiang, Y; Okeke, CO; Plyler, RJ; Quigley, HA; Ying, GS, 2009
)
0.57
" Multiple daily dosing with the drug produced a persistent IOP-lowering effect."( Evaluation of monkey intraocular pressure by rebound tonometer.
Cao, G; Chen, L; Li, N; Liu, X; Ma, J; Pang, IH; Qiu, J; Yan, N; Yu, M; Yu, W, 2009
)
0.35
"To assess adherence in glaucoma patients using the Travatan Dosing Aid (TDA); to record differences in adherence by age, sex, therapy, systemic therapies, years from diagnosis, type of therapy and intraocular pressure (IOP)."( Monitoring adherence rates in glaucoma patients using the Travatan Dosing Aid. A 6-month study comparing patients on travoprost 0.004% and patients on travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination.
Bianchi, PE; Milano, G; Pasinetti, GM; Rossi, GC; Scudeller, L; Tinelli, C, 2010
)
0.57
"To identify patterns and rates of adherence with travoprost eye drops using the Travatan dosing aid (TDA) and to present a method for graphically presenting adherence data."( Patterns and rate of adherence to glaucoma therapy using an electronic dosing aid.
Ajit, RR; Fenerty, CH; Henson, DB, 2010
)
0.62
" In total 23 of the complete data sets showed good adherence (dosing within +/-4 h of the agreed dosing time on >80% of occasions), 3 patients discontinued usage before 75 days, 4 showed frequent drug holidays (no dosing for > or =8 days) and 7 frequently missed doses with adherence rates of <60%."( Patterns and rate of adherence to glaucoma therapy using an electronic dosing aid.
Ajit, RR; Fenerty, CH; Henson, DB, 2010
)
0.36
"After up to a 6-week medicine-free period, XFG patients were randomized to either TTFC or LTFC for 3 months, dosed each evening, and then changed to the opposite treatment for another 3 months."( 24-h Intraocular pressure control with evening-dosed travoprost/timolol, compared with latanoprost/timolol, fixed combinations in exfoliative glaucoma.
Dimopoulos, AT; Embeslidis, TA; Haidich, AB; Konstas, AG; Mikropoulos, DG; Papanastasiou, A; Stewart, WC, 2010
)
0.61
"5%), in order to evaluate both efficacy (intraocular pressure lowering) and tolerability (patient and investigator satisfaction) of two dosing regimens--evening (PM) and morning (AM)."( Comparison of evening and morning dosing of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination in 6 month period.
Bojić, L; Dosen, VM; Ekert, M; Laus, KN; Mandić, Z; Suić, SP, 2010
)
0.62
"To assess the relation between visual field progression and adherence rate in patients with glaucoma using Travatan Dosing Aid® (TDA)."( Do adherence rates and glaucomatous visual field progression correlate?
Bianchi, PE; Pasinetti, GM; Radaelli, R; Rossi, GC; Scudeller, L,
)
0.13
" The potential benefit to the human ocular surface with oncedaily dosing needs to be evaluated clinically."( Polyquad-preserved travoprost/timolol, benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved travoprost/timolol, and latanoprost/timolol in fixed combinations: a rabbit ocular surface study.
Baudouin, C; Brignole-Baudouin, F; Liang, H; Pauly, A; Riancho, L, 2011
)
0.7
"In this prospective randomized controlled trial, subjects with IOP of at least 22  mm Hg in one or both eyes at 0900  h, and IOP of at least 21  mm Hg in one or both eyes at 1100  h and 1600  h at two eligibility visits were randomly assigned to receive either TRA/TIM BAK-free (n=195) or TRA/TIM (n=193), dosed once daily in the morning (0900  h) for 6 weeks."( Travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5%-fixed combination with and without benzalkonium chloride: a prospective, randomized, doubled-masked comparison of safety and efficacy.
Bae, K; Iwamoto, Y; Kitazawa, Y; Kotake, S; Sasaki, N; Smith, P, 2011
)
1.81
" A change was done from prior monotherapy at day 0 to TTFC dosed once a day, regardless in the evening or in the morning, without washout period."( Safety and efficacy of monotherapy change to fixed combination (travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5%) in 6 months follow up period.
Barisić, F; Biuk, D; Bojić, L; Clementi, D; Dobutović, D; Dogan, KK; Dosen, VM; Ekert, M; Geser, MZ; Iveković, R; Jurić-Miletić, A; Kovacević, S; Kovacić, Z; Krolo, I; Mandić, Z; Novak-Laus, K; Pavan, J; Pelcić, G; Popović-Suić, S; Susić, N; Tomić, M, 2010
)
0.6
" All subjects were given a Travalert(®) dosing aid and were reviewed after one and four months."( [The influence of the Travalert(®) dosing aid on medical treatment compliance and the quality of life of glaucoma patients].
Escalada, A; García Sánchez, J; García-Feijoó, J; Martínez-de-la-Casa, JM; Sáenz-Francés, F; Sánchez-Pulgarín, M, 2011
)
0.37
"Compliance is very important in the treatment of glaucoma, and our study provides objective data through the use of Travalert dosing aid with relative compliances of 70%."( [The influence of the Travalert(®) dosing aid on medical treatment compliance and the quality of life of glaucoma patients].
Escalada, A; García Sánchez, J; García-Feijoó, J; Martínez-de-la-Casa, JM; Sáenz-Francés, F; Sánchez-Pulgarín, M, 2011
)
0.37
"UBM revealed cyclodialysis in the patient's affected eye after a single dosage of bimatoprost."( A case hypersensitive to bimatoprost and dexamethasone.
Li, X; Liu, G; Liu, X; Wang, Y; Xiang, H; Yu, W, 2011
)
0.37
" They were then crossed over to the opposite dosing schedule for the following month."( Morning dosing of once-daily glaucoma medication is more convenient and may lead to greater adherence than evening dosing.
Carlsson, A; Crichton, AC; Ford, BA; Gooi, M, 2013
)
0.39
"Adherence was compared between morning versus evening dosing and first versus second month dosing."( Morning dosing of once-daily glaucoma medication is more convenient and may lead to greater adherence than evening dosing.
Carlsson, A; Crichton, AC; Ford, BA; Gooi, M, 2013
)
0.39
"07) in adherence between morning dosing (90."( Morning dosing of once-daily glaucoma medication is more convenient and may lead to greater adherence than evening dosing.
Carlsson, A; Crichton, AC; Ford, BA; Gooi, M, 2013
)
0.39
"A total of 371 patients randomly received travoprost BAK-free (n=185) or travoprost BAK (n=186) dosed once daily in the evening for 3 months."( Comparison of a travoprost BAK-free formulation preserved with polyquaternium-1 with BAK-preserved travoprost in ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma.
Coote, M; Denis, P; Gandolfi, S; Goldberg, I; Paredes, T; Pillai, MR; Stalmans, I; Volksone, L; Wells, A,
)
0.74
"To study the effect of patient education and the TravAlert(®) -Eyot(®) drop guider on intraocular pressure (IOP) and adherence in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) monitored with the TravAlert(®) dosing aid."( Adherence improvement in Dutch glaucoma patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Beckers, HJ; Brink, HM; Busch, MJ; Colen, TP; Schouten, JS; Webers, CA, 2013
)
0.39
" Patients were randomized to one of the four study arms: (1) use of the dosing aid, (2) use of the dosing aid with the drop guider, (3) use of the dosing aid together with patient education or (4) use of the dosing aid and drop guider together with patient education."( Adherence improvement in Dutch glaucoma patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Beckers, HJ; Brink, HM; Busch, MJ; Colen, TP; Schouten, JS; Webers, CA, 2013
)
0.39
" An 8-month follow-up period, using an electronic adherence monitoring device (Travalert dosing aid, TDA), will indicate if the intervention is likely to be sustained in the longer term."( Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to estimate the effects and costs of a patient centred educational intervention in glaucoma management.
Bhattacharya, D; Broadway, DC; Cate, H; Clark, A; Fordham, R; Notley, C, 2012
)
0.38
"A predictive model for nonadherence was developed from the Travatan Dosing Aid (TDA) study (n = 196) using stepwise logistic regression."( Development and validation of a predictive model for nonadherence with once-daily glaucoma medications.
Boland, MV; Chang, DS; Frazier, T; Friedman, DS; Plyler, R, 2013
)
0.39
" Adherence was calculated as the percentage of days on which a dose was taken within 4 hours of the average dosing time for that patient."( Development and validation of a predictive model for nonadherence with once-daily glaucoma medications.
Boland, MV; Chang, DS; Frazier, T; Friedman, DS; Plyler, R, 2013
)
0.39
" Participants were randomised into two groups and adherence was measured over 8 months, using an electronic monitoring device (Travalert® dosing aid, TDA)."( Improving adherence to glaucoma medication: a randomised controlled trial of a patient-centred intervention (The Norwich Adherence Glaucoma Study).
Bhattacharya, D; Broadway, DC; Cate, H; Clark, A; Fordham, R; Holland, R, 2014
)
0.4
"5% (TRAV+TIM; unfixed) using electronic dosing aids."( Adherence to Fixed-Combination Versus Unfixed Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% for Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Randomized Trial.
Barnebey, HS; Robin, AL, 2017
)
0.71
"TTFC was administered once daily in the morning or evening with a single dosing aid."( Adherence to Fixed-Combination Versus Unfixed Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% for Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Randomized Trial.
Barnebey, HS; Robin, AL, 2017
)
0.71
"Adherence with administered medication, as recorded by the dosing aids."( Adherence to Fixed-Combination Versus Unfixed Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% for Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Randomized Trial.
Barnebey, HS; Robin, AL, 2017
)
0.71
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (5)

RoleDescription
antiglaucoma drugAny drug which can be used to prevent or alleviate glaucoma, a disease in which the optic nerve is damaged, resulting in progressive, irreversible loss of vision. It is often, though not always, associated with increased pressure of the fluid in the eye.
antihypertensive agentAny drug used in the treatment of acute or chronic vascular hypertension regardless of pharmacological mechanism.
prodrugA compound that, on administration, must undergo chemical conversion by metabolic processes before becoming the pharmacologically active drug for which it is a prodrug.
ophthalmology drugAny compound used for the treatment of eye conditions or eye diseases.
prostaglandin receptor agonistAn agonist that binds to and activates prostaglandin receptors.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (3)

ClassDescription
prostaglandins Falpha
(trifluoromethyl)benzenesAn organofluorine compound that is (trifluoromethyl)benzene and derivatives arising from substitution of one or more of the phenyl hydrogens.
isopropyl esterAny carboxylic ester resulting from the formal condensation of a carboxylic acid with the hydroxy group of propan-2-ol.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (4)

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)74.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)43.90000.11007.190310.0000AID1473738
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (41)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (24)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (17)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (19)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID485979Inhibition of CETP in rabbit serum at 10 uM after 1 hr by fluorescent cholesteryl esters transfer assay2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Discovery of new cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors via ligand-based pharmacophore modeling and QSAR analysis followed by synthetic exploration.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (439)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's213 (48.52)29.6817
2010's194 (44.19)24.3611
2020's32 (7.29)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 82.44

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index82.44 (24.57)
Research Supply Index6.48 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.48 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index148.40 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.01 (0.95)

This Compound (82.44)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials166 (34.16%)5.53%
Reviews48 (9.88%)6.00%
Case Studies39 (8.02%)4.05%
Observational9 (1.85%)0.25%
Other224 (46.09%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (134)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Parallel Group Phase 2 Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Travoprost Ophthalmic Topical Cream in Subjects With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT06152861]Phase 2250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-15Recruiting
A Twelve-Week, Double Masked, Parallel Group, Primary-Therapy Pilot Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Travoprost 0.004% Compared to Pilocarpine 1% in Patients With Chronic Angle-Closure Glaucoma [NCT00762645]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Examination of Ocular Surface Effects With Administration of TRAVATAN Z® and XALATAN® [NCT00798759]Phase 4236 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Effects of Latanoprost, Bimatoprost and Travoprost in Patients With Latanoprost-resistant Glaucoma [NCT01361841]141 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-01-31Recruiting
Randomized Crossover Trial Comparing the Hypotensive Effect of Generic Travoprost With That of the Brand Name Travoprost in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT02796560]Phase 476 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-01Completed
Choroidal Thickness and Its Correlations With Ocular Parameters in Cases With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma [NCT03966560]Phase 496 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Examination of Ocular Surface Effects With Administration of TRAVATAN Z® and Xalatan® [NCT00708422]Phase 4231 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A Six-Week, Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Safety and Efficacy Study of Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% BAC-free Compared to Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00760539]Phase 387 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Comparison Between the Effect of Latanoprost 0.005%, Travoprost 0.004% and Tafluprost 0.0015% on Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation in Patients Having Primary Open-angle Glaucoma [NCT04461249]60 participants (Actual)Observational2019-06-01Completed
A Proof of Concept Study to Assess the Safety and IOP-Lowering Effect of AL-59412C Injected Intravitreally [NCT01312454]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Management decision)
Safety and Efficacy of Using the Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination (DuoTrav®) in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Uncontrolled Ocular Hypertension by Beta-blocker Monotherapy (Timolol 0.5%) [NCT01336569]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
A Twelve-Month Open-Label Safety Study of Polyquaternium-Preserved DuoTrav APS Dosed Once Daily in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00928590]Phase 3155 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Changing to DuoTrav® (Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination) as Replacement Therapy in Patients Uncontrolled on Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Therapy (Fixed or Unfixed) [NCT01230736]Phase 4105 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Catioprost® (Unpreserved Latanoprost 0.005% Emulsion) Compared to Travatan Z® in Subjects With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension and Ocular Surface Disease [NCT01254370]Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
[NCT00892762]Phase 3434 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
1-year Randomized Control Trial Investigating the Value of an Intervention to Enhance Adherence in Glaucoma Patients Receiving Prostaglandin Monotherapy and in Patients Who Are Candidates for Adjunctive Therapy [NCT00756184]Phase 4107 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Stop Retinal Ganglion Cell Dysfunction Study [NCT02390284]Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Active, not recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Adding the Brinzolamide/Timolol Maleate Fixed Combination (AZARGA®) to Ocular Hypertensive or Glaucoma Patients Uncontrolled on Prostaglandin Monotherapy [NCT01263444]Phase 447 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Prospective, Non-Randomized, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Single Arm Study of Exchange of Travoprost Intraocular Implant [NCT04615403]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-19Completed
Prospective, Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Two Models of a Travoprost Intraocular Implant to Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.5% [NCT03868124]Phase 3560 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-17Active, not recruiting
Prospective, Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Two Elution Rates of Glaukos Travoprost Intraocular Implants to Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, USP 0.5% [NCT02754596]Phase 2154 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-29Completed
The Effects of Latanoprost, Bimatoprost and Travoprost on Periocular Skin Pigmentation [NCT00705757]Phase 489 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Parallel-group, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of OTX-TIC (Travoprost) Intracameral Implant in Subjects With Open-angle Glaucoma (OAG) or Ocular Hypertension (OHT) [NCT05335122]Phase 2105 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-16Active, not recruiting
A Double-masked, Randomized, Controlled Study Assessing the Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of Two AR 12286/Travoprost Fixed-dose Combination Products Compared to Travatan® Z in Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pressure [NCT01474135]Phase 293 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
A Six-Week, Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Safety and Efficacy Study of Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% BAC-free Compared to Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00672997]Phase 3301 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Comparison of Safety and IOP-Lowering Efficacy of Three Alternative Travoprost Formulations to Vehicle and TRAVATAN® in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00670033]Phase 2158 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing the Effects of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty and Travoprost on the Circadian Intraocular Pressure Variation [NCT02105311]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
Effect of Non-steroid Anti-inflammatory Drug on Travoprost-induced Conjunctival Hyperemia and Intraocular Pressure Reduction in Normal Eyes [NCT02136589]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Quality of 24-hour Intraocular Pressure Control Obtained With the Brinzolamide/Timolol Fixed Combination Compared With the Brimonidine/Timolol Fixed Combination When Added to Travoprost Monotherapy in Subjects With Open-angle Glaucoma [NCT00981786]Phase 451 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
[NCT00759239]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Comparison of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty With Prostaglandin Analogues for Lowering Intraocular Pressure in Eyes With Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma [NCT01004900]Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-06-30Recruiting
Dry Eye and Irritation Comparison of Latanoprost 0.005% With the Preservative Benzalkonium Chloride (BAC) Vs Travoprost 0.004% Without BAC [NCT00803387]33 participants (Actual)Observational2008-04-30Completed
A 12 Week Comparison of DuoTrav and Xalacom at 24 Hours Post-Dose in the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma (the DVX Study) [NCT00887029]Phase 454 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Argon Laser Peripheral Iridoplasty for Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma: A Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT00980473]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-09-30Recruiting
[NCT00872651]Phase 3242 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A Double-Masked, Parallel-Group, Efficacy and Safety Study of Brinzolamide 1.0% (AZOPT) as Adjunctive Therapy to Travoprost 0.004% (TRAVATAN) in Patients With Chronic Angle-Closure Glaucoma [NCT00758342]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Terminated(stopped due to difficulty of enrolling patients)
An Evaluation of the Ocular Surface Health in Subjects Using TRAVATAN Z® Ophthalmic Solution Versus XALATAN® Ophthalmic Solution [NCT00761319]Phase 3705 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Adherence Assessment With the Travalert™ Dosing Aid in Patients With Ocular Hypertension or Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Who Are Treated With the Travoprost/Timolol Maleate Fixed Combination Every Evening [NCT00676637]55 participants (Actual)Observational2008-05-31Completed
[NCT00767494]Phase 317 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Project Cancelled)
Influence of Travoprost 0.004% and Latanoprost 0.005% on Retinal Vascular Diameter and Choroidal Blood Flow in Glaucoma Patients [NCT00308945]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
[NCT00767481]Phase 36 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Project Cancelled)
[NCT00440011]Phase 4266 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Adherence Assessment With the Travalert™ Dosing Aid in Patients With Ocular Hypertension or Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Who Are Treated With the Travoprost/Timolol Maleate Fixed Combination Every Evening [NCT00680329]55 participants (Actual)Observational2008-05-31Completed
A Study Assessing the Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of PG286 Ophthalmic Solution, 0.5% Compared to Its Individual Components [NCT01789736]Phase 2234 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Phase I Clinical Study, to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of the Ophthalmic Solution PRO-179 Compared With Travatan®, on the Ocular Surface of Clinically Healthy Subjects. [NCT03965052]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-24Completed
An Evaluation of the Ocular Surface Health in Subjects Using TRAVATAN Z® Ophthalmic Solution Versus XALATAN® Ophthalmic Solution [NCT00690794]Phase 3726 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A Multi-Center, Double-Masked Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Travoprost APS Compared to TRAVATAN® in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00848536]Phase 3371 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Ocular Surface Changes With Topical Prostaglandin Analog Therapy [NCT00798694]Phase 458 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
An 8 Week, Single Masked, Parallel-Group, Exploratory Study Comparing Ocular Surface Signs and Symptoms in Monotherapy Ocular Hypertension or Glaucoma Patients Randomized to Either Xalatan® or Travatan Z® [NCT00799682]Phase 456 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Blood-aqueous Barrier Changes After the Use of Timolol and Prostaglandin Analogues Fixed Combination in Pseudophakic Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma [NCT01978015]Phase 469 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Safety And Efficacy Of Topical Prostaglandin F2α Analogs In Combination With Fractional CO2 Laser And 308 Excimer Light In Treatment Of Vitiligo [NCT04577027]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-01Not yet recruiting
Assessing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Changing to DUOTRAV® (Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% BAK-Free Fixed Combination), as Replacement Therapy in Patients Previously on Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Therapy (Fixed or Unfixed) [NCT01327599]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Travoprost, 0.004% Versus Tafluprost, 0.0015% in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertensive Patients [NCT00966940]Phase 451 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Comparison of the Additivity of Brinzolamide Ophthalmic Suspension, 1% (Azopt) and Brimonidine Tartrate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.15% (Alphagan P) to Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution, 0.004% (Travatan) in Patients With Elevated IOP on Travoprost. A Three Mon [NCT00121147]200 participants Interventional2003-09-30Completed
[NCT00333125]Phase 3319 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
A Comparison of Latanoprost (Xalatan) With Travoprost (Travatan) and Bimatoprost (Lumigan) in Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pressure. A Twelve-week, Masked Evaluator, Phase IV, Multicenter Study in the United States. (Xalatan vs Travatan vs Lumigan). [NCT00847483]Phase 4375 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
A Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Paired Comparison Study of the Mechanism of Action of TRAVATAN 0.004% in Subjects With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00061503]Phase 40 participants Interventional2003-04-30Completed
IOP Lowering Efficacy of Travoprost/Brinzolamide Fixed Combination Ophthalmic Suspension in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00527501]Phase 2136 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
A Multicenter Study of the Pigmentation in the Trabecular Meshwork After Two Years of Treatment With TRAVATAN 0.004% Ophthalmic Solution [NCT01485822]88 participants (Actual)Observational2004-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Study objectives met)
Evaluation of Continuous IOP Measurement and the Influence of Drug Induced IOP Decrease on the Measurement [NCT01491867]9 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Comparison of Bimatoprost 0.03% Monotherapy vs. Dual Therapy With Travoprost 0.004% and Timolol 0.5% in Patients With Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension [NCT00348023]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
Trabeculectomy Versus 2-iStent and Prostaglandin Study [NCT03274323]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-12Withdrawn(stopped due to Difficulty obtaining IDE by the FDA. Currently not worthwhile to pursue further.)
Examining The Efficacy, Safety And Improved Tolerability Of Travoprost BAK Free Ophthalmic Solution (Travatan-Z) Compared To Prior Prostaglandin Therapy [NCT00444665]Phase 4750 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
In Vivo Effects of Antiglaucomatous Prostaglandin Therapy on Immune Cells, Epithelium, and Nerves of the Ocular Surface: A Laser In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Study [NCT01315574]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Slow Enrollment)
A 12-Month Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Instillation of Combination Glaucoma Therapy in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00311389]Phase 3408 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
[NCT00293761]Phase 3109 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
[NCT00293800]Phase 3173 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
An Evaluation of Use of Topical Ocular Hypotensive Medication by Electronic Compliance Measures [NCT00329095]Phase 460 participants Interventional2005-12-31Completed
24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Control With Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination [NCT00331240]Phase 332 participants Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Visual Function Changes After Intraocular Pressure Reduction Using Antiglaucoma Medications: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT00435058]54 participants Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Effects of Travoprost on Neovascular Glaucoma [NCT00441181]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-01-31Withdrawn
A Crossover, Double-Masked Comparison Investigating the 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure Control With the Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Versus Travoprost, When Both Are Given in the Evening, in Subjects With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma [NCT00444184]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Short Term Comparative Study of Xalatan With Benzalkonium Chloride vs. Travatan Z Without Benzalkonium Chloride in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00468988]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
[NCT00539526]Phase 4106 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
[NCT00527592]Phase 454 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
[NCT01114893]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
[NCT00716742]1,099 participants (Actual)Observational2004-09-30Completed
A Multi-Center, Three-Stage, Open-Label, Prospective, Active-Comparator-Controlled Phase 2a Study of ENV515 (Travoprost) Intracameral Implant in Patients With Bilateral Ocular Hypertension or Early Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma [NCT02371746]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-01Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Switching to the Travoprost/Timolol Maleate Fixed Combination (DUOTRAV®) From Prior Mono or Two-Drug Therapy in Germany [NCT00519753]Phase 4522 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Assessing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Changing to DuoTrav® (Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% BAK-Free Fixed Combination), as Replacement Therapy in Patients Previously on Prior Prostaglandin Fixed Combination [NCT01514721]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Terminated(stopped due to low enrollment)
Effect of Prophylactic Aqueous Suppression on Hyperencapsulation of Ahmed Glaucoma Valves [NCT01535768]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-02-29Recruiting
Bimatoprost/Timolol Versus Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combinations in an Egyptian Population: A Hospital-Based Prospective Randomized Study [NCT01542710]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
A Five-Year, Multicenter, Commercial Label Safety Study of TRAVATAN® 0.004% in Patients With TRAVATAN-Induced Iris Pigmentation Changes [NCT00047554]336 participants (Actual)Observational2003-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Study objectives met)
A Safety and Efficacy Study of Travoprost 0.004% Compared to Latanoprost 0.005% in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00051142]Phase 30 participants Interventional2001-02-28Completed
A Safety and Efficacy Study of Travoprost 0.004% Compared to Latanoprost 0.005% in Patients With Chronic Angle-Closure Glaucoma. [NCT00051181]Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-01-31Completed
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Arm, Double Masked, Vehicle Controlled Phase 3A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of OTX-TP in the Treatment of Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT02914509]Phase 3565 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-07Completed
A 6-Week Safety and Efficacy Study of TRAVATAN Compared to XALCOM in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. [NCT00051155]Phase 30 participants Interventional2001-01-31Completed
Prospective, Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Two Models of a Travoprost Intraocular Implant to Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.5% [NCT03519386]Phase 3590 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-26Active, not recruiting
Adherence of Patients Using Travalert® for Instillation of a Fixed Combination of Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% Compared to a Concomitant Regimen of Travoprost 0.004% and Timolol 0.5% [NCT00508469]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Twelve-Week, Double Masked, Parallel Group, Study of Travoprost 0.004% Compared to Timolol 0.5% in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00763061]Phase 4111 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
[NCT00288951]Phase 3690 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
A Study of Glaucoma Therapy to Treat Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00293787]Phase 3156 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
Diurnal Curves With Bimatoprost 0.03% Versus Travoprost 0.004% [NCT00347802]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
Post Marketing Surveillance Study to Evaluate the Safety Profile of Travacom (Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination) in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Across India [NCT01510132]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Withdrawn
The 24 Control of IOP in Ocular Hypertension: a Cross-over Study on Inflow Versus Outflow Drugs. [NCT01655758]Phase 461 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
Study of Travatan and Cosopt in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00471068]Phase 446 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Question raised by Ethics Committee)
Assessing the Efficacy of DuoTrav® (Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination), as a Replacement Therapy in Glaucoma Patients in Russia, Previously on Prior Prostaglandin Analogue or Beta-blocker Monotherapy [NCT01696383]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to Management decision)
Additive Effect of Brinzolamide 1%/Brimonidine 0.2% Fixed Dose Combination As Adjunctive Therapy to Travoprost [NCT01937299]Phase 4307 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
24-Hour Efficacy of Travoprost/Timolol Benzalkonium Chloride BAK Free Compared With Latanoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Therapy in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma Insufficiently Controlled With Latanoprost Monotherapy [NCT01779284]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Compliance Study Comparing DuoTrav to TRAVATAN Plus Timolol Using the Dosing Aid [NCT00465803]Phase 381 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Multi-Center Study Assessing the Efficacy and Tolerability of TRAVATAN® Solution Without BAK, Containing Polyquad® Preservative (0.004% Travoprost) in Patients Previously on Latanoprost 0.005% or Bimatoprost 0.01% Ophthalmic Solution Monotherapy [NCT01493427]Phase 4202 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
A 3 Month, Multicenter, Double-Masked Safety and Efficacy Study of Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution, 0.004% Compared to Timolol (0.5% or 0.25%) in Pediatric Glaucoma Patients [NCT01652664]Phase 3184 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
[NCT01547598]Phase 4135 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
An Open-Label, Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution, 0.004% in Pediatric Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients [NCT01658839]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Effect of Travoprost 0.004% on Retinal Oximetry in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma [NCT01711177]14 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Prospective, Randomized Evaluation of Subjects With Open-angle Glaucoma, Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma, or Ocular Hypertension Naïve to Medical and Surgical Therapy, Treated With Two Trabecular Micro-bypass Stents (iStent) or Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution [NCT01443988]Phase 4101 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of iDose® TR (Travoprost Intraocular Implant) in Conjunction With Cataract Surgery [NCT06061718]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-11Recruiting
Safety and IOP Lowering Efficacy of Low Dose Travoprost Ophthalmic Solutions Dosed BID Compared to TRAVATAN® in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00637130]Phase 2138 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
The Secondary Beneficial Effects of Prostaglandin Analog Treatment in Thyroid Eye Disease Patients. [NCT01927406]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding source unavailable)
[NCT01298687]Phase 267 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
A 6-week, Double Masked, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Twice-daily Brinzolamide 1%/Brimonidine 0.2% Fixed Dose Combination as an Adjunctive Therapy to Travoprost 0.004% in Reducing Intraocular Pressure in Patients With No [NCT03150160]Phase 41 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-21Completed
A Prospective, Randomized Evaluation of Subjects With Open-angle Glaucoma, Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma, or Ocular Hypertension Naïve to Medical and Surgical Therapy, Treated With Two Trabecular Micro-bypass Stents (iStent Inject) or Travoprost Ophthalmic S [NCT01444040]Phase 4196 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Multicenter, Randomized, Double-masked Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of iDose® TR (Travoprost Intraocular Implant) in Conjunction With the Placement of iStent Infinite vs. iStent Infinite Alone in Subjects With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hy [NCT06066645]Phase 3150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-14Recruiting
Assessing the Efficacy and Tolerability of TRAVATAN® Solution Without BAK, Containing Polyquad® Preservative (Travoprost 0.004%) Versus LUMIGAN® 0.01% Solution With BAK (Bimatoprost 0.01%) in Treatment Naïve Patients With Ocular Hypertension or Open Angle [NCT01664039]Phase 4104 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
A Long-term Safety Study of Once-daily TRAVATAN [NCT00051168]Phase 3502 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
[NCT01253902]Phase 4164 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Preservative-free Fixed-dose Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% / Timolol 0.5% in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: Clinical Effectiveness, Tolerability and Safety in a Real World Setting [NCT04828057]50 participants (Actual)Observational2021-09-01Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Timolol Maleate 0.5% Compared to Brinzolamide 1% When Added to Travoprost 0.004% in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00372827]Phase 4245 participants Interventional2004-02-29Completed
Multi-Center Study Comparing Efficacy and Tolerability of TRAVATAN® BAK-free (0.004% Travoprost) in Patients Previously on Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005% Monotherapy [NCT01510145]Phase 4191 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Masked Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution, 0.003% Compared to TRAVATAN in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT01453855]Phase 31,099 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
The Effects of Topical Beta Blocker and Prostaglandin on Interval Intraocular Pressure in Intravitreal Injection - a Randomised Controlled Prospective Study [NCT04868175]64 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-01Completed
A 6-Week Proof-of-Concept Study Evaluating the Safety and IOP-Lowering Efficacy of Travoprost/Brinzolamide Fixed Combination Ophthalmic Suspension in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT02140060]Phase 2327 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Investigation of the Effect of Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution of Lowering Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma [NCT01995136]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
A Phase IV Study of Travoprost + Brinzolamide to Treat Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00471380]Phase 446 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Prospective Evaluation of Open-angle Glaucoma Subjects on Two Topical Hypotensive Medications (One a Prostaglandin) Treated With Two Trabecular Micro-bypass Stents (iStent Inject) and a Postoperative Topical Prostaglandin [NCT02873806]Phase 453 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
[NCT01881126]Phase 493 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Additive Effect of Brinzolamide 1%/Brimonidine 0.2% Fixed Dose Combination as Adjunctive Therapy to a Prostaglandin Analogue [NCT01937312]Phase 4282 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Assessment of Late Day IOP Control in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Treated With Travoprost 0.004% (TRAVATAN® Z) or Bimatoprost 0.01% (LUMIGAN®) [NCT01464424]Phase 484 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
A 90-Day, Open-Label, Multi-Site, Pilot Study Evaluating the Safety and Intraocular Lowering Effect of Delivering Travoprost Using a Punctal Plug Delivery System (Evolute®) in Subjects With Elevated Intraocular Pressure [NCT04962009]12 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-08Completed
Three Month Safety and Efficacy Study of TRAVATAN® vs Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution, 0.004% [NCT01452009]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Management Decision)
Additive Effect of Twice Daily Brinzolamide 1%/Brimonidine 0.2% Fixed Dose Combination as an Adjunctive Therapy to a Prostaglandin Analogue [NCT02419508]Phase 4290 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-07Completed
Safety and Efficacy With Twice Daily Brinzolamide 1%/Brimonidine 0.2% (SIMBRINZA®) as an Adjunctive Therapy to Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% (DUOTRAV®) [NCT02730871]Phase 4173 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-24Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment Challenges)
[NCT02097719]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of DuoTrav® in Patients Previously Uncontrolled on a Beta-blocker [NCT02003391]Phase 4157 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00051168 (1) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure
NCT00440011 (2) [back to overview]Tolerability - Conjunctival Hyperemia
NCT00440011 (2) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT00471068 (1) [back to overview]Intaocular Pressure (IOP) Mean Change After 6 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00471380 (1) [back to overview]Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT00508469 (1) [back to overview]Adherence
NCT00527592 (1) [back to overview]Comfort Immediately After Dosing
NCT00539526 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) at Month 3
NCT00539526 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Conjunctival Hyperemia Scores at Month 3
NCT00539526 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining With Fluorescein at Month 3
NCT00690794 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change at Day 90 From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score
NCT00690794 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score = 0
NCT00705757 (1) [back to overview]The Extent of Latanoprost, Bimatoprost and Travoprost Induced Periocular Skin Hyperpigmentation Over a One Year Time Course in Newly Diagnosed Primary Open Angle and Ocular Hypertension Patients.
NCT00708422 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score
NCT00708422 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Tear Film Break Up Time (TBUT)
NCT00716742 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bilateral Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at One Year
NCT00758342 (1) [back to overview]Mean IOP (Intraocular Pressure)
NCT00761319 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score = 0
NCT00761319 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change at Day 90 From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score
NCT00762645 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Peripheral Anterior Synechiae (PAS)
NCT00762645 (2) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT00763061 (4) [back to overview]Mean IOP Change From Baseline at 9 AM
NCT00763061 (4) [back to overview]Mean IOP Change at 4 PM
NCT00763061 (4) [back to overview]Week 12 - Mean IOP At 4 PM
NCT00763061 (4) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 9 AM
NCT00798694 (6) [back to overview]Ocular Surface Disease Index Score
NCT00798694 (6) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure
NCT00798694 (6) [back to overview]Corneal Staining Score
NCT00798694 (6) [back to overview]Conjunctival Hyperemia Score
NCT00798694 (6) [back to overview]Change in Tear Break up Time (TBUT)
NCT00798694 (6) [back to overview]Tear Production
NCT00798759 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT)
NCT00798759 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score
NCT00848536 (3) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure at 4:00 pm
NCT00848536 (3) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure at 9:00 am
NCT00848536 (3) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure at 11:00 am
NCT00966940 (7) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 10:00 AM
NCT00966940 (7) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 12:00 PM
NCT00966940 (7) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 2:00 PM
NCT00966940 (7) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 4:00 PM
NCT00966940 (7) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 6:00 PM
NCT00966940 (7) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8:00 PM
NCT00966940 (7) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8:00 AM
NCT01114893 (2) [back to overview]IOP Change From Baseline at 8 PM on Day 5
NCT01114893 (2) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Change From Baseline at 8 AM on Day 5
NCT01253902 (3) [back to overview]Mean Conjunctival Hyperemia at Week 12
NCT01253902 (3) [back to overview]Mean Corneal Staining With Fluorescein at Week 12
NCT01253902 (3) [back to overview]Mean Tear Break Up Time (TBUT) at Week 12
NCT01263444 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP Per Prostaglandin Group at Week 12
NCT01263444 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Reaching the Target IOP (≤ 18 mmHg)
NCT01263444 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 4
NCT01263444 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12
NCT01315574 (3) [back to overview]Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score
NCT01315574 (3) [back to overview]Effectiveness in Lowering Intraocular Pressure
NCT01315574 (3) [back to overview]Tear Film Break-Up Time
NCT01327599 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Hyperemia Score at Week 12 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline
NCT01327599 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 12 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline
NCT01327599 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 4 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline
NCT01327599 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at Week 12 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline
NCT01327599 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Reach Target IOP of ≤ 18 mmHg in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline
NCT01336569 (1) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Change at the Final Visit From Baseline (Prior Beta-blocker Monotherapy)
NCT01453855 (1) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 2, Week 6, and Month 3 for Each Assessment Time Point (8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM)
NCT01464424 (2) [back to overview]Overall Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT01464424 (2) [back to overview]Mean IOP at Each After Office Hour Evaluation Timepoint
NCT01493427 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 12 Weeks From Prior Therapy (Baseline)
NCT01493427 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Target IOP (≤18 mmHg) at 12 Weeks
NCT01510145 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Reach Target IOP (≤18 mmHg)
NCT01510145 (2) [back to overview]Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 12 Weeks From Prior Therapy (Baseline)
NCT01547598 (5) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT01547598 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥15% Reduction in Mean Diurnal IOP From Baseline
NCT01547598 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 12
NCT01547598 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 6
NCT01547598 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 18 mmHg
NCT01652664 (1) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Month 3
NCT01658839 (6) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Travoprost Free Acid Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT01658839 (6) [back to overview]Time to Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast)
NCT01658839 (6) [back to overview]Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax)
NCT01658839 (6) [back to overview]Area Under the Analyte Plasma Concentration-time Curve to the Last Quantifiable Sampling Time Point [AUC(0-tlast)]
NCT01658839 (6) [back to overview]Area Under the Analyte Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (Inf)[AUC(0-∞)]
NCT01658839 (6) [back to overview]Half-life (t½)
NCT01664039 (8) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 6
NCT01664039 (8) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 6 and Month 3
NCT01664039 (8) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at Month 3 and Month 6
NCT01664039 (8) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline In Tear Film Break Up Time (TBUT) at Month 3 and Month 6
NCT01664039 (8) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Change From Baseline in Conjunctiva Staining by Grade at Month 3 and Month 6
NCT01664039 (8) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining by Grade at Month 3 and Month 6
NCT01664039 (8) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Change From Baseline in Ocular Hyperaemia by Grade at Each Visit
NCT01664039 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Reached Target IOP at Each Visit
NCT01711177 (1) [back to overview]Blood Oxygenation
NCT01881126 (1) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM
NCT01937299 (3) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6
NCT01937299 (3) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal IOP Change From Baseline to Week 6
NCT01937299 (3) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal IOP Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 6
NCT01937312 (4) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal IOP Change From Baseline to Week 6
NCT01937312 (4) [back to overview]Mean IOP at Week 6 for Each Time Point (8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, 5 PM)
NCT01937312 (4) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6
NCT01937312 (4) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal IOP Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 6
NCT01995136 (1) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP (9:00 AM) at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12
NCT02003391 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP (8AM) at Week 4 in the Study Eye
NCT02003391 (3) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8AM in the Study Eye
NCT02003391 (3) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in IOP (8AM) at Week 4 in the Study Eye
NCT02097719 (1) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM
NCT02140060 (1) [back to overview]Mean IOP at Week 6
NCT02371746 (1) [back to overview]Summary of Change From Baseline Average Intraocular Pressure Diurnal Measurement by Treatment Group Population (Cohort 1)
NCT02419508 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at 11:00 at Week 6
NCT02419508 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at 09:00 at Week 6
NCT02419508 (7) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in IOP at 11:00 at Week 6
NCT02419508 (7) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP at Week 6
NCT02419508 (7) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Change From Baseline at 09:00 at Week 6
NCT02419508 (7) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal IOP at Week 6
NCT02419508 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline (on PGA) in Diurnal IOP (Mean of 09:00 and 11:00 Time Points) at Week 6
NCT02730871 (5) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in IOP (09:00, 11:00) at Week 6
NCT02730871 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP (09:00, 11:00) at Week 6
NCT02730871 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) (Mean of Changes at 09:00 and 11:00 Time Points) at Week 6
NCT02730871 (5) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal IOP at Week 6
NCT02730871 (5) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP at Week 6
NCT02754596 (2) [back to overview]IOP (mmHg) Change From Baseline at Week 12
NCT02754596 (2) [back to overview]Severe Adverse Events
NCT02796560 (2) [back to overview]Comfort and Intolerance to the Drops Questionnaire
NCT02796560 (2) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure
NCT02914509 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events
NCT02914509 (4) [back to overview]Mean IOP
NCT02914509 (4) [back to overview]Mean IOP
NCT02914509 (4) [back to overview]Mean IOP
NCT03519386 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months Postoperative
NCT03868124 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months Postoperative
NCT03965052 (7) [back to overview]Eye Comfort Index
NCT03965052 (7) [back to overview]Number of Eyes of Chemosis
NCT03965052 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT03965052 (7) [back to overview]Visual Ability
NCT03965052 (7) [back to overview]Changes in Intraocular Pressure
NCT03965052 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Eyes With Conjunctival Hyperemia (CH) by Grade
NCT03965052 (7) [back to overview]Number of Eyes With Epithelial Defects by Grade
NCT04615403 (1) [back to overview]Ocular Safety
NCT04962009 (1) [back to overview]Mean Percent Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Change

Mean Intraocular Pressure

"Mean IOP for the patient's worse eye at baseline was used in the secondary endpoint analysis. 2 consecutive IOP measurements for each eye were taken. If the 2 measurements for the same eye differ by 4 mmHg or less, the average of the measurements would be considered as the mean IOP for that eye. If the 2 measurements for the same eye differ by more than 4 mmHg, then a third measurement was to be taken.~All IOP measurements were performed with a Goldmann applanation tonometer." (NCT00051168)
Timeframe: At 5 years.

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mm Hg) (Mean)
Travatan16.5

[back to top]

Tolerability - Conjunctival Hyperemia

Conjunctival Hyperemia: Number of participants with at least 1 grade increase in severity from baseline. A five grade scale from 0 to 3 (0 = none, +0.5 = trace, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) (NCT00440011)
Timeframe: Month 3

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bimatoprost15
Travoprost22

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

Intraocular Pressure (NCT00440011)
Timeframe: Month 3

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Bimatoprost17
Travoprost17.5

[back to top]

Intaocular Pressure (IOP) Mean Change After 6 Weeks of Treatment

IOP measured at week 6 minus IOP measured at baseline (NCT00471068)
Timeframe: At week 0 and week 6

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mm Hg) (Mean)
Travatan-4.57
Cosopt-4.08

[back to top]

Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP)

Intra Ocular Pressure, calculated as AUC (area under the curve) of IOP measured from 8.00 a.m. to 8.00 p.m, at different time-points (NCT00471380)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of each period (week 8, week 16, week 24)

,
Interventionmm Hg (millimeters mercury)*week (Mean)
Week 8Week 16Week 24
Crossover Group ABB179.20188.82201.50
Crossover Group BAA191.89196.26191.93

[back to top]

Adherence

Patients were considered adherent if a minimum of 80% of their instillations were administered ±2 hours of the scheduled time. (NCT00508469)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of adherent patients (Number)
Travalert With Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination63
Travalert With Travoprost and Timolol43

[back to top]

Comfort Immediately After Dosing

Comfort was assessed by the patient and recorded on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 = perfect comfort and 100 = worse discomfort imaginable. (NCT00527592)
Timeframe: 5 seconds

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Travoprost7.8
Latanoprost7.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) at Month 3

Change from baseline in TBUT at month 3. TBUT is defined as the time (seconds) required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A positive number change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT00539526)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,,
InterventionSeconds (Mean)
BaselineMonth 3
Bimatoprost 0.03%9.10.5
Latanoprost 0.005%8.60.4
Travoprost 0.004%7.91.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Conjunctival Hyperemia Scores at Month 3

Change from baseline in mean conjunctival hyperemia scores at month 3. Hyperemia is engorgement of the blood vessels (redness) of the bulbar conjunctiva of the eye (the clear membrane covering the white surface of the eye). Hyperemia was graded using a 5-point scale in which 0=no redness and +3=deep, diffuse redness. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT00539526)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,,
InterventionScores on Scale (Mean)
BaselineMonth 3
Bimatoprost 0.03%0.740.05
Latanoprost 0.005%0.740.06
Travoprost 0.004%0.860.07

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining With Fluorescein at Month 3

Change from baseline in corneal staining with fluorescein at month 3. The cornea is the transparent front part of the eye which covers the iris and pupil. To detect the presence or absence of corneal puncta (tiny disruptions in the surface of the eye), fluorescein dye is administered into the eye and the eye is graded using a 5-point scale where 0 equals no puncta (best), and 3 equals too many puncta to count (worst). A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT00539526)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,,
InterventionScores on a Scale (Mean)
BaselineMonth 3
Bimatoprost 0.03%0.590.15
Latanoprost 0.005%0.70-0.18
Travoprost 0.004%0.48-0.07

[back to top]

Mean Change at Day 90 From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score

The OSDI is a 12-question validated questionnaire (resultant overall 0-100 point score) used to measure ocular symptoms, visual function and environmental factors that may affect a patient's vision, where 0 = normal and 100 = severe. The OSDI questionnaire was administered at both visits and completed by the patient with no assistance from the office staff, physician, or anyone else. The baseline OSDI score was subtracted from the 90-day OSDI score and reported as change. A negative number represents a perceived improvement in ocular health. (NCT00690794)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 90

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Travoprost-11.3
Latanoprost-11.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score = 0

The corneal surface was assessed by the investigator and graded on a scale of 0-3, where 0 = Absent (no staining present) and 3 = Severe (>50% coverage). Percentage of patients with score = 0 at 90 days was calculated by dividing the number of patients with score = 0 by the total number of patients analyzed. (NCT00690794)
Timeframe: Day 90

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Travoprost37.1
Latanoprost40.0

[back to top]

The Extent of Latanoprost, Bimatoprost and Travoprost Induced Periocular Skin Hyperpigmentation Over a One Year Time Course in Newly Diagnosed Primary Open Angle and Ocular Hypertension Patients.

"Periocular skin color was measured with the Minolta Chroma Meter CR-400 and the L*a*b* system, also known as Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. This is a well-accepted unit of measurement in which L* corresponds to brightness and a* and b* correspond to chromaticity.~Measurements were taken at baseline and 1 year. Data from each time point and each location (upper and lower eyelids or cheeks/face) were averaged, and subtracted from the baseline value for that location. Six predetermined areas on and around the upper and lower eyelid and 2 areas of the face/cheek were measured.Upper and lower eyelid values were averaged and reported as single value for each location ie;-upper eyelids, lower eyelid and cheek/face. A decrease in luminance indicates increased pigmentation at the site of measurement." (NCT00705757)
Timeframe: one year

,,
InterventionL*a*b* (Mean)
Upper LidLower LidCheek/Face
Lumigan-0.90-0.370.30
Travatan-0.900.170.51
Xalatan-1.420.480.55

[back to top]

Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score

The OSDI is a 12-question validated questionnaire (resultant overall 0-100 score) used to measure ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors that may affect a patient's vision, where 0 = normal and 100 = severe. The OSDI questionnaire was administered at both visits and completed by the patient with no assistance from the office staff, physician, or anyone else. The baseline OSDI score was subtracted from the 12-week OSDI score and reported as change. A negative number represents a perceived improvement in ocular health. (NCT00708422)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (Day 84)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Travoprost-0.0
Latanoprost-1.3

[back to top]

Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Tear Film Break Up Time (TBUT)

Tear film break-up time was assessed by the same examiner both visits using the same slitlamp/settings. Examiner instilled fluorescein onto the patient's eye, after which the patient blinked several times, then kept the eye open. Immediately thereafter, the examiner used a stopwatch to time the occurrence of the first break in the fluorescein film. Three consecutive measurements were taken and averaged for actual TBUT. TBUT at Baseline (Day 0) was subtracted from TBUT at 12 weeks (Day 84) and reported as change. A higher number represents a lengthening in the tear film break up time. (NCT00708422)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (Day 84)

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Travoprost0.8
Latanoprost1.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bilateral Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at One Year

Change from baseline in bilateral (both eyes) IOP at the 1 year follow-up visit. IOP is a measure of the fluid pressure inside the eye. The bilateral IOP was calculated as an average between both eye's IOP. A negative number change from baseline indicates reduction in IOP (improvement). (NCT00716742)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 Year

,,
InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at 1 Year
Lumigan®20.8-4.8
Travatan®20.3-4.3
Xalatan®20.6-4.3

[back to top]

Mean IOP (Intraocular Pressure)

(NCT00758342)
Timeframe: Screening: Week 12; (At 9 am and 4 pm time points)

,
Interventionmm Hg (millimeters mercury) (Mean)
9 AM measurement4 PM measurement
Travoprost 0.004% + Brinzolamide 1.0%17.5817.11
Travoprost 0.004% + Tears Natural20.5918.50

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score = 0

The corneal surface was assessed by the investigator and graded on a scale of 0-3, where 0 = Absent (no staining present) and 3 = Severe (>50% coverage). Percentage of patients with score = 0 at 90 days was calculated by dividing the number of patients with score = 0 by tht total number of patients analyzed. (NCT00761319)
Timeframe: Day 90

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Travoprost37.6
Latanoprost38.7

[back to top]

Mean Change at Day 90 From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score

The OSDI is a 12-question validated questionnaire (resultant overall 0-100 score) used to measure ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors that may affect a patient's vision, where 0 = normal and 100 = severe. The OSDI questionnaire was administered at both visits and completed by the patient with no assistance from the office staff, physician, or anyone else. A negative number represents a perceived improvement in ocular health. (NCT00761319)
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 90

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Travoprost-9.1
Latanoprost-10.2

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Peripheral Anterior Synechiae (PAS)

(NCT00762645)
Timeframe: Week 12 Visit

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Travoprost 0.004% (Travatan)0
Pilocarpine 1%0

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

(NCT00762645)
Timeframe: 4PM at Week 12 Visit

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mm Hg) (Mean)
Travoprost 0.004% (Travatan)15.77
Pilocarpine 1%18.35

[back to top]

Mean IOP Change From Baseline at 9 AM

Bilateral IOP measurements by Goldmann applanation were performed at 9AM and 4 PM. Two IOP measurements were taken and averaged. If the difference between the first and second reading was greater than 4 mmHg, a third reading was taken and the two nearest readings averaged. (NCT00763061)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12 - at 9 AM

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Travoprost 0.004%-5.1
Timolol 0.5%-4.4

[back to top]

Mean IOP Change at 4 PM

Bilateral IOP measurements by Goldmann applanation were performed at 9AM and 4 PM. Two IOP measurements were taken and averaged. If the difference between the first and second reading was greater than 4 mmHg, a third reading was taken and the two nearest readings averaged. (NCT00763061)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12 - at 4 PM

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Travoprost 0.004%-5.3
Timolol 0.5%-3.7

[back to top]

Week 12 - Mean IOP At 4 PM

Bilateral IOP measurements by Goldmann applanation were performed at 9AM and 4 PM. Two IOP measurements were taken and averaged. If the difference between the first and second reading was greater than 4 mmHg, a third reading was taken and the two nearest readings averaged. (NCT00763061)
Timeframe: At the 4 PM time point for the patient's worse eye.

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Travoprost 0.004%15.7
Timolol 0.5%17.9

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 9 AM

Bilateral IOP measurements by Goldmann applanation were performed at 9AM and 4 PM. Two IOP measurements were taken and averaged. If the difference between the first and second reading was greater than 4 mmHg, a third reading was taken and the two nearest readings averaged. (NCT00763061)
Timeframe: At Week 12 - At the 9 AM time point for the patient's worse eye.

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Travoprost 0.004%16.3
Timolol 0.5%18.1

[back to top]

Ocular Surface Disease Index Score

Ocular Surface Disease Index Scores (OSDI) were obtained from a 12-item validated OSDI questionnaire completed by each participant. This is an assessment related to eye comfort. Each question's score ranges from 0 = no disability to 4 = greatest disability. The total score is multiplied by 25 then divided by the number of questions answered then matched to a grid ranging from 0 to 100 with 0 having symptoms reported none of the time versus 100 having disability symptoms reported all of the time. (NCT00798694)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline1 month2 months
Group 1 Travatan Z11.711.711.8
Group 1 Xalatan10.810.811.1
Group 2 Travatan Z14.28.111.2
Group 2 Xalatan9.87.06.6

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure

Intraocular pressure (the fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured two times in each eye using the Goldman applanation tonometer and averaged. (NCT00798694)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline1 month2 months
Group 1 Travatan Z20.115.515.2
Group 1 Xalatan20.915.614.6
Group 2 Travatan Z15.014.514.3
Group 2 Xalatan14.815.114.6

[back to top]

Corneal Staining Score

Corneal staining is an indication of the amount of dryness of the cornea (front clear part of the eye). A total score was obtained by the sum of assessments in five areas of each eye which are scored from 0 to 3 (0 = no dryness; 3 = severe dryness), then summed per eye for a total score range of 0-15 (0 = no dryness; 15 = severe dryness). (NCT00798694)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline1 month2 months
Group 1 Travatan Z0.80.81.3
Group 1 Xalatan0.70.71.0
Group 2 Travatan Z1.01.21.0
Group 2 Xalatan1.01.31.0

[back to top]

Conjunctival Hyperemia Score

Conjunctival hyperemia is the amount of redness on the white part of the eye. A total score was obtained by the sum of assessments in 6 areas of each eye are which are scored from 0 to 3 (0 = no redness; 3 = severe redness), then summed per eye for a total score range of 0-18 (0 = no redness; 18 = severe redness). (NCT00798694)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline1 month2 months
Group 1 Travatan Z4.64.65.3
Group 1 Xalatan4.04.04.0
Group 2 Travatan Z3.64.84.0
Group 2 Xalatan3.23.43.3

[back to top]

Change in Tear Break up Time (TBUT)

Difference of tear break up time (in seconds, average of 3 measurements) at one and two months after enrollment. (NCT00798694)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months

,
Interventionseconds (Mean)
1 month2 months
Currently on Xalatan-0.590.27
New to Meds-0.86-2.00

[back to top]

Tear Production

Tear production, measured by Schirmer test in millimeters (NCT00798694)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months

,
Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Baseline1 month2 months
Group 1 (New to Meds)22.421.123.0
Group 2 (Currently on Xalatan)17.117.417.4

[back to top]

Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT)

Tear film break-up time was assessed by the same examiner both visits using the same slitlamp/settings. Examiner instilled fluorescein onto the patient's eye, after which the patient blinked several times, then kept the eye open. Immediately thereafter, the examiner used a stopwatch to time the occurrence of the first break in the fluorescein film. Three consecutive measurements were taken and averaged for actual TBUT. TBUT at Baseline (Day 0) was subtracted from TBUT at 12 weeks (Day 84) and reported as change. A higher number represents a lengthening in the tear film break up time. (NCT00798759)
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 84

InterventionSeconds (Mean)
Travoprost0.7
Latanoprost0.6

[back to top]

Mean Change at 12 Weeks (Day 84) From Baseline (Day 0) in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score

The OSDI is a 12-question validated questionnaire (resultant overall 0-100 score) used to measure ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors that may affect a patient's vision, where 0 = normal and 100 = severe. The OSDI questionnaire was administered at both visits and completed by the patient with no assistance from the office staff, physician, or anyone else. The baseline OSDI score was subtracted from the 12-week OSDI score and reported as change. A negative number represents a perceived improvement in ocular health. (NCT00798759)
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 84

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Travoprost-1.9
Latanoprost0.6

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure at 4:00 pm

"For an individual patient, two consecutive IOP measurements for each eye were taken. The mean IOP values for each individual patient's eye were rounded up to the next whole number if the value was ≥ 0.5 mmHg~All IOP measurements were performed with a Goldmann applanation tonometer. All IOP measurements for any individual subject were to be performed preferably by the same operator using the same tonometer.~Mean IOP for the patient's worse eye at baseline was used in the primary endpoint analysis. If both eyes were equal, then the right eye was selected for analysis" (NCT00848536)
Timeframe: 3 months (measured at 4:00 pm)

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
TRAVATAN APS16.9
TRAVATAN17.1

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure at 9:00 am

"For an individual patient, two consecutive IOP measurements for each eye were taken. The mean IOP values for each individual patient's eye were rounded up to the next whole number if the value was ≥ 0.5 mmHg~All IOP measurements were performed with a Goldmann applanation tonometer. All IOP measurements for any individual subject were to be performed preferably by the same operator using the same tonometer.~Mean IOP for the patient's worse eye at baseline was used in the primary endpoint analysis. If both eyes were equal, then the right eye was selected for analysis" (NCT00848536)
Timeframe: 3 months (measured at 9:00 am)

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
TRAVATAN APS17.9
TRAVATAN18.1

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure at 11:00 am

"For an individual patient, two consecutive IOP measurements for each eye were taken. The mean IOP values for each individual patient's eye were rounded up to the next whole number if the value was ≥ 0.5 mmHg~All IOP measurements were performed with a Goldmann applanation tonometer. All IOP measurements for any individual subject were to be performed preferably by the same operator using the same tonometer.~Mean IOP for the patient's worse eye at baseline was used in the primary endpoint analysis. If both eyes were equal, then the right eye was selected for analysis" (NCT00848536)
Timeframe: 3 months (measured at 11:00 am)

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
TRAVATAN APS17.4
TRAVATAN17.5

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 10:00 AM

Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. (NCT00966940)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Travoprost16.7
Tafluprost17.3

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 12:00 PM

Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. (NCT00966940)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Travoprost16.7
Tafluprost17.2

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 2:00 PM

Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. (NCT00966940)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Travoprost16.9
Tafluprost17.3

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 4:00 PM

Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. (NCT00966940)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Travoprost17.1
Tafluprost17.6

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 6:00 PM

Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. (NCT00966940)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Travoprost16.9
Tafluprost17.6

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8:00 PM

Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. (NCT00966940)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Travoprost17.1
Tafluprost17.7

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8:00 AM

Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. (NCT00966940)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Travoprost17.0
Tafluprost17.5

[back to top]

IOP Change From Baseline at 8 PM on Day 5

Outcome measure shows how each treatment reducted eye pressure at 8 PM on Day 5 compared to the eye pressure at 8 PM before the start of treatment (NCT01114893)
Timeframe: 5 Days

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Travatan 0.004% QD-3.9
Travoprost Vehicle-0.9
Travoprost Group A-2.7
Travoprost Group B-5.7
Travoprost Group C-4.8

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Change From Baseline at 8 AM on Day 5

Outcome measure shows how each treatment reduced eye pressure at 8 AM on Day 5 compared to the eye pressure at 8 AM before the start of treatment (NCT01114893)
Timeframe: 5 days

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Travatan 0.004% QD-9.8
Travoprost Vehicle-2.9
Travoprost Group A-5.0
Travoprost Group B-6.5
Travoprost Group C-6.8

[back to top]

Mean Conjunctival Hyperemia at Week 12

Conjunctival hyperemia was analyzed using the average of the scores of both eyes. Hyperemia is engorgement of the blood vessels (redness) of the bulbar conjunctiva of the eye (the clear membrane covering the white surface of the eye). Hyperemia was graded on a 5 point scale where 0=none (normal), 0.5=trace (trace flush reddish pink), 1=Mild (mild flush reddish color), 2=Moderate (bright red color) and 3=severe (deep bright diffuse redness). (NCT01253902)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Bimatoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.01%0.42
Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.004%0.46
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005%0.44

[back to top]

Mean Corneal Staining With Fluorescein at Week 12

Corneal staining was analyzed using the average of the scores of both eyes. The cornea is the transparent front part of the eye which covers the iris and pupil. To detect the presence or absence of corneal puncta (tiny disruptions in the surface of the eye), fluorescein dye is administered into the eye and the eye is graded using a 5-point scale where 0=None (no puncta), 0.5=Trace (1-5 puncta), 1=Mild (6-20 puncta), 2=Moderate (>20 puncta) and 3=Severe (too many puncta to count). (NCT01253902)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Bimatoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.01%0.31
Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.004%0.32
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005%0.22

[back to top]

Mean Tear Break Up Time (TBUT) at Week 12

Tear Break Up Time was analyzed using the average of the readings of both eyes. TBUT is defined as the time (seconds) required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. (NCT01253902)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionSeconds (Mean)
Bimatoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.01%9.7
Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.004%9.7
Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005%9.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP Per Prostaglandin Group at Week 12

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. Only prostaglandin subgroups with ≥ 15 patients were analyzed. Only one eye (study eye) contributed to the mean. (NCT01263444)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
AZARGA + Latanoprost (n=22)AZARGA + Travoprost (n=15)
Azarga-7.1-5.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Reaching the Target IOP (≤ 18 mmHg)

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye (study eye) was assessed. (NCT01263444)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azarga70.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 4

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. Only one eye (study eye) contributed to the mean. (NCT01263444)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Azarga-6.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. Only one eye (study eye) contributed to the mean. (NCT01263444)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Azarga-6.0

[back to top]

Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score

Corneal Fluorescein Staining score was used in this study to quantify changes in dry eye symptoms. Corneal fluorescein staining scores range from 0 to 4 points: 0=non-staining to 4 =regional whole staining of the cornea. Higher scores indicate worse eye condition. (NCT01315574)
Timeframe: At the 6 month follow-up time point

Interventionunits on a scale (1-4) (Mean)
Latanoprost (Xalatan)1
Travoprost (Travatan Z)1.5

[back to top]

Effectiveness in Lowering Intraocular Pressure

Applanation tonometry will be used to measure patients' intraocular pressure (NCT01315574)
Timeframe: At the 6 month follow-up time point

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Latanoprost (Xalatan)13.7
Travoprost (Travatan Z)17.2

[back to top]

Tear Film Break-Up Time

Tear Film Break-Up Time (TBUT) is a clinical test used to quantify changes in dry eye symptoms. The Tear Film Break-Up time is the number of seconds between the subjects last blink and the detection of the first dry spot in the tear film. (NCT01315574)
Timeframe: At the 6 month follow-up time point

InterventionSeconds (Mean)
Latanoprost (Xalatan)6.3
Travoprost (Travatan Z)6.7

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Hyperemia Score at Week 12 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline

Ocular hyperemia (visible eye redness) was assessed during slit lamp examination and graded on a 5-point scale (0=none, 4=severe). A positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in ocular redness. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only the study eye was used for analysis. (NCT01327599)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
DUOTRAV®-0.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 12 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline

IOP (fluid pressure in the eye) was measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry. A positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in intraocular pressure, which may be a risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only the study eye was used for analysis. (NCT01327599)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)Change from baseline at Week 12
DUOTRAV®20.0-3.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 4 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline

IOP (fluid pressure in the eye) was measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry. A positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in intraocular pressure, which may be a risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only the study eye was used for analysis. (NCT01327599)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)Change from Baseline at Week 4
DUOTRAV®20.1-3.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at Week 12 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline

The OSDI is a 12-item quality of life questionnaire designed to assess ocular surface symptoms, their severity, and their impact on the subject's ability to function. Each item was scored by the subject on a 0-4 Likert-type scale (0=None, 4=All of the Time), with a resultant overall score of 0-100 (0=no disability, 100=complete disability). A negative number change from baseline represents a perceived improvement in ocular health. (NCT01327599)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)Change from Baseline at Week 12
DUOTRAV®14.9-3.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Reach Target IOP of ≤ 18 mmHg in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline

IOP (fluid pressure in the eye) was measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry. An increase in intraocular pressure may be a risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only the study eye was used for analysis. (NCT01327599)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 12
DUOTRAV®78.685.5

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Change at the Final Visit From Baseline (Prior Beta-blocker Monotherapy)

As measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. High IOP (outside the normal range) can be a risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. (NCT01336569)
Timeframe: Baseline, up to 6 weeks

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
DuoTrav-5.0

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 2, Week 6, and Month 3 for Each Assessment Time Point (8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM)

As measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. One eye from each subject was chosen as the study eye and only the study eye was used in the efficacy analysis. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). (NCT01453855)
Timeframe: Week 2, Week 6, Month 3 (8 AM, 10 AM, 4 PM)

,
Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
Week 2 at 8 AMWeek 2 at 10 AMWeek 2 at 4 PMWeek 6 at 8 AMWeek 6 at 10 AMWeek 6 at 4 PMMonth 3 at 8 AMMonth 3 at 10 AMMonth 3 at 4 PM
TRAVATAN19.518.618.319.318.618.119.318.618.0
Travoprost 0.003%19.418.618.019.318.518.019.218.318.0

[back to top]

Overall Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

IOP was measured at three after office hour evaluation time points (4 pm, 6 pm, and 8 pm) for an overall mean. The three timepoints correspond to 20, 22, and 24 hours post dose. Efficacy analysis was performed for one eye only, i.e., the designated study eye. Per-protocol dataset was pre-specified for this non-inferiority analysis. (NCT01464424)
Timeframe: Week 6

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
TRAVATAN17.45
LUMIGAN17.22

[back to top]

Mean IOP at Each After Office Hour Evaluation Timepoint

IOP was measured at three after office hour evaluation time points (4 pm, 6 pm, and 8 pm). The three timepoints correspond to 20, 22, and 24 hours post dose. Efficacy analysis was performed for one eye only, i.e., the designated study eye. (NCT01464424)
Timeframe: Week 6: 4 pm, 6 pm, 8 pm

,
Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
4 pm (20 hours post dose)6 pm (22 hours post dose)8 pm (24 hours post dose)
LUMIGAN17.0817.3217.26
TRAVATAN17.7417.5217.06

[back to top]

Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 12 Weeks From Prior Therapy (Baseline)

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the efficacy analysis. (NCT01493427)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 12 (n=178)
TRAVATAN® BAK-free17.0-1.16

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Target IOP (≤18 mmHg) at 12 Weeks

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the efficacy analysis. (NCT01493427)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
TRAVATAN® BAK-free81.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Reach Target IOP (≤18 mmHg)

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the efficacy analysis. (NCT01510145)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
TRAVATAN® BAK-free93.3

[back to top]

Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 12 Weeks From Prior Therapy (Baseline)

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the efficacy analysis. (NCT01510145)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineChange from baseline at Week 12
TRAVATAN® BAK-free14.8-1.09

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. The mean diurnal IOP was the average of the IOP values of the study eye (worse eye) at Week 12 measured at 8 AM, 12 Noon and 4 PM. For each study eye, IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the average of 3 measurements. (NCT01547598)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
LUMIGAN® RC18.6
DuoTrav®17.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥15% Reduction in Mean Diurnal IOP From Baseline

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure in the eye. The mean diurnal IOP was the average of the IOP values of the study eye (worse eye) measured at 8 AM, 12 Noon and 4 PM. For each eye, IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the average of 3 measurements. (NCT01547598)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
LUMIGAN® RC26.2
DuoTrav®47.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 12

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP of the study eye (worse eye) was measured at 8 AM, 12 Noon and 4 PM at Week 12. For each eye, IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the average of 3 measurements. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. (NCT01547598)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline_8 AMChange from Baseline at Week 12 _8 AM (n=61,63)Baseline_12 NoonChange from Baseline at Week 12_12 Noon (n=61,63)Baseline_4 PMChange from Baseline at Week 12_4 PM (n=61,63)
DuoTrav®22.0-4.520.3-2.319.8-2.4
LUMIGAN® RC22.0-2.720.6-1.919.8-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 6

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP of the study eye (worse eye) was measured at 8 AM, 12 Noon and 4 PM at Week 6. For each eye, IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the average of 3 measurements. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. (NCT01547598)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline_ 8 AMChange from Baseline at Week 6 _8 AM (n=66,64)Baseline_12 NoonChange from Baseline at Week 6_12 Noon (n=66,64)Baseline_4 PMChange from Baseline at Week 6_4 PM (n=66,64)
DuoTrav®22.0-4.820.3-2.819.8-2.9
LUMIGAN® RC22.0-2.820.6-2.119.8-1.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 18 mmHg

IOP is a measure of the fluid pressure in the eye. The mean diurnal IOP was the average of the IOP values of the study eye (worse eye) at Week 12 measured at 8 AM, 12 Noon and 4 PM. For each eye, IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the average of 3 measurements. (NCT01547598)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
LUMIGAN® RC11.5
DuoTrav®17.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Month 3

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using a calibrated tonometer and measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye from each participant was chosen as the study eye and only the study eye was used for analysis. (NCT01652664)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Month 3

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Travoprost-5.4
Timolol-5.3

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Travoprost Free Acid Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Travoprost free acid plasma concentrations at each collection time point (predose, 10, 20, 40, 80 minutes postdose) were quantitated using a high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method (HPLC/MS/MS). Cmax was calculated for each participant with at least 1 quantifiable time point. (NCT01658839)
Timeframe: Day 7, Up to 80 minutes postdose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Overall (n=11)2 mo to < 3 years (n=2)3 to <12 years (n=6)12 to <18 years (n=3)
Travoprost0.02560.04710.02580.0109

[back to top]

Time to Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast)

Analyte plasma concentrations at each collection time point (predose, 10, 20, 40, 80 minutes postdose) were quantitated using a high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method (HPLC/MS/MS). Tlast was calculated for each participant with at least 1 quantifiable time point. (NCT01658839)
Timeframe: Day 7, Up to 80 minutes postdose

Interventionhours (Mean)
Overall (n=11)2 mo to <3 years (n=2)3 to <12 years (n=6)12 to <18 years (n=3)
Travoprost0.420.340.460.39

[back to top]

Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax)

Analyte plasma concentrations at each collection time point (predose, 10, 20, 40, 80 minutes postdose) were quantitated using a high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method (HPLC/MS/MS). Tmax was calculated for each participant with at least 1 quantifiable time point. (NCT01658839)
Timeframe: Day 7, Up to 80 minutes postdose

Interventionhours (Mean)
Overall (n=11)2 mo to <3 years (n=2)3 to <12 years (n=6)12 to <18 years (n=3)
Travoprost0.250.260.170.39

[back to top]

Area Under the Analyte Plasma Concentration-time Curve to the Last Quantifiable Sampling Time Point [AUC(0-tlast)]

Analyte plasma concentrations at each collection time point (predose, 10, 20, 40, 80 minutes postdose) were quantitated using a high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method (HPLC/MS/MS). AUC(0-tlast) was calculated for each participant with at least 2 quantifiable time points. (NCT01658839)
Timeframe: Day 7, Up to 80 minutes postdose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
Overall (n=6)2 mo to <3 years (n=2)3 to <12 years (n=4)
Travoprost0.01160.01010.0123

[back to top]

Area Under the Analyte Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (Inf)[AUC(0-∞)]

Analyte plasma concentrations at each collection time point (predose, 10, 20, 40, 80 minutes postdose) were quantitated using a high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method (HPLC/MS/MS). AUC(0-∞) was calculated for each participant with at least 3 quantifiable time points. (NCT01658839)
Timeframe: Day 7, Up to 80 minutes postdose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
Overall (n=1)3 to <12 years (n=1)
Travoprost0.03890.0389

[back to top]

Half-life (t½)

Analyte plasma concentrations at each collection time point (predose, 10, 20, 40, 80 minutes postdose) were quantitated using a high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method (HPLC/MS/MS). T½ was calculated for each participant with at least 3 quantifiable time points. (NCT01658839)
Timeframe: Day 7, Up to 80 minutes postdose

Interventionhours (Mean)
Overall (n=1)3 to <12 years (n=1)
Travoprost0.530.53

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the analysis. (NCT01664039)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Month 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day 0)Change from Baseline at Month 6, n=46,43
LUMIGAN24.59-7.35
TRAVATAN24.66-7.61

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 6 and Month 3

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in mmHg. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the analysis. (NCT01664039)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 6, Month 3

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change from Baseline at Week 6, n=46,46Change from Baseline at Month 3, n=46,44
LUMIGAN-7.02-7.82
TRAVATAN-7.50-7.96

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at Month 3 and Month 6

"The OSDI questionnaire (used to measure vision-related function, ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors that may affect vision) was answered by the subject. Each of the 12 items was scored on a 0-4 Likert scale, where 0 is None of the time and 4 is All of the time. A resultant overall 0-100 score was calculated, with higher scores representing greater disability. A negative number change represents a perceived improvement in ocular health." (NCT01664039)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Month 3, Month 6

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (Day 0)Change from Baseline at Month 3, n=44,43Change from Baseline at Month 6, n=44,42
LUMIGAN10.60.01.7
TRAVATAN14.6-0.30.4

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline In Tear Film Break Up Time (TBUT) at Month 3 and Month 6

TBUT (the time required for dry spots to appear on the corneal surface after blinking) was assessed by the investigator using slit lamp examination . A longer break up time is a sign of a more stable tear film. A positive number change from baseline indicates improvement. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the analysis. (NCT01664039)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Month 3, Month 6

,
Interventionseconds (Mean)
Baseline (Day 0)Change from Baseline at Month 3, n=46,44Change from Baseline at Month 6, n=46,43
LUMIGAN11.7-1.8-2.2
TRAVATAN10.7-1.6-2.2

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Change From Baseline in Conjunctiva Staining by Grade at Month 3 and Month 6

Conjunctiva staining was assessed after ophthalmic dye was instilled in the eye. The upper eyelid was lifted slightly, and the eye was compared to grading panels. Conjunctiva staining was graded on a scale from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe). One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the analysis. (NCT01664039)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Month 3, Month 6

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, Grade 0Baseline, Grade 1Baseline, Grade 2Month 3, -1 Grade Change from BaselineMonth 3, 0 Grade Change from BaselineMonth 3, +1 Grade Change from BaselineMonth 3, +2 Grade Change from BaselineMonth 6, -1 Grade Change from BaselineMonth 6, 0 Grade Change from BaselineMonth 6, +1 Grade Change from BaselineMonth 6, +2 Grade Change from Baseline
LUMIGAN39916335072691
TRAVATAN446063631431110

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining by Grade at Month 3 and Month 6

Corneal staining was assessed after ophthalmic dye was instilled in the eye. The upper eyelid was lifted slightly, and the eye was compared to grading panels. Corneal staining was graded on a scale from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe). One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the analysis. (NCT01664039)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Month 3, Month 6

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, Grade 0Baseline, Grade 1Baseline, Grade 2-1 Grade Change from Baseline at Month 30 Grade Change from Baseline at Month 3+1 Grade Change from Baseline at Month 3-1 Grade Change from Baseline at Month 60 Grade Change from Baseline at Month 6+1 Grade Change from Baseline at Month 6+2 Grade Change from Baseline at Month 6
LUMIGAN39914337725101
TRAVATAN41817336428131

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Change From Baseline in Ocular Hyperaemia by Grade at Each Visit

Ocular Hyperaemia (excess of blood in the white of the eyes (sclera)) was graded by the investigator on a 4-point scale where 0=None/Trace, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the analysis. (NCT01664039)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 6, Month 3, Month 6

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, Grade 0Baseline, Grade 1Baseline, Grade 2-1 Grade Change from Baseline at Week 60 Grade Change from Baseline at Week 6+1 Grade Change from Baseline at Week 6+2 Grade Change from Baseline at Week 6-1 Grade Change from Baseline at Month 30 Grade Change from Baseline at Month 3+1 Grade Change from Baseline at Month 3+2 Grade Change from Baseline at Month 3-1 Grade Change from Baseline at Month 60 Grade Change from Baseline at Month 6+1 Grade Change from Baseline at Month 6+2 Grade Change from Baseline at Month 6
LUMIGAN31171123202115262115252
TRAVATAN4091220231213256020233

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Reached Target IOP at Each Visit

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in mmHg. Target IOP was defined as ≤ 18 mmHg. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the analysis. (NCT01664039)
Timeframe: Week 6, Month 3, Month 6

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 6, n=46,46Month 3, n=46,44Month 6, n=46,43
LUMIGAN56.570.567.4
TRAVATAN69.671.773.9

[back to top]

Blood Oxygenation

For each subject, all the measurements will be done during an 1 hour appointment. (NCT01711177)
Timeframe: 1 hour

Interventionpercentage of oxygenation (Mean)
Normal Control60
Glaucoma Suspect60
Newly Diagnosed Glaucoma60

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP of the study eye (worse eye) is measured at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM. IOP is either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement is required, the average of 3 measurements. (NCT01881126)
Timeframe: Week 12 at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Week 12 at 8 AMWeek 12 at 12 PMWeek 12 at 4 PM
Bimatoprost 0.01% and Hypromellose 0.3%16.416.016.5
Travatan 0.004% and Timolol 0.5%15.115.014.5

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6

Diurnal IOP was defined as the average of the four timepoints measured (8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, and 5 PM). IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). One eye was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used for the analyses. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). (NCT01937299)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SIMBRINZA17.44
Vehicle20.34

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal IOP Change From Baseline to Week 6

Baseline IOP was defined as the average of the timepoint-matched IOP measurements at Eligibility 1 and Eligibility 2 Visits. Diurnal IOP change was defined as the average of the four changes from baseline (timepoints 8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, and 5 PM). IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). One eye was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used for the analyses. A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. (NCT01937299)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SIMBRINZA-5.10
Vehicle-2.22

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal IOP Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 6

Baseline IOP was defined as the average of the timepoint-matched IOP measurements at Eligibility 1 and Eligibility 2 Visits. Diurnal IOP Percentage Change was defined as the average of the four percent changes from baseline (timepoints 8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, and 5 PM). IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). One eye was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used for the analyses. A more negative percent change from baseline indicates a greater amount of improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. (NCT01937299)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
SIMBRINZA-22.27
Vehicle-9.57

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal IOP Change From Baseline to Week 6

Baseline IOP was defined as the average of the timepoint-matched IOP measurements at Eligibility 1 and Eligibility 2 Visits. Diurnal IOP change was defined as the average of the four changes from baseline (timepoints 8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, and 5 PM). IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). One eye was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used for the analysis. A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. (NCT01937312)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SIMBRINZA-5.69
Vehicle-1.99

[back to top]

Mean IOP at Week 6 for Each Time Point (8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, 5 PM)

IOP was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. One eye was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used for the analysis. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). (NCT01937312)
Timeframe: Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
8 AM10 AM3 PM5 PM
SIMBRINZA19.415.817.215.6
Vehicle21.420.219.919.9

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6

Diurnal IOP was defined as the average of the four timepoints measured (8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, and 5 PM). IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). One eye was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used for the analysis. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). (NCT01937312)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SIMBRINZA17.01
Vehicle20.37

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal IOP Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 6

Baseline IOP was defined as the average of the timepoint-matched IOP measurements at Eligibility 1 and Eligibility 2 Visits. Diurnal IOP Percentage Change was defined as the average of the four percent changes from baseline (timepoints 8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, and 5 PM). IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). One eye was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used for the analysis. A more negative percent change from baseline indicates a greater amount of improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. (NCT01937312)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
SIMBRINZA-24.88
Vehicle-8.50

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP (9:00 AM) at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Data at 9:00 AM from Weeks 4, 8, and 12 were pooled. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. One eye (study eye) was subject to analysis. (NCT01995136)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
TRAVATAN Z16.55-3.37

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP (8AM) at Week 4 in the Study Eye

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and is measured in mmHg. A negative change indicates an improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02003391)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
DuoTrav-5.840
Beta-blocker-1.069

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8AM in the Study Eye

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and is measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02003391)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
DuoTrav16.6129
Beta-blocker21.2320

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in IOP (8AM) at Week 4 in the Study Eye

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and is measured in mmHg. A more negative percent change from baseline indicates a greater amount of improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02003391)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
DuoTrav-25.365
Beta-blocker-4.716

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP of the study eye (worse eye) is measured at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM. IOP is either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement is required, the average of 3 measurements. (NCT02097719)
Timeframe: Week 12 at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Week 12 at 8 AM (N=46, 50)Week 12 at 12 PM (N=46, 50)Week 12 at 4 PM (N=47, 50)
Bimatoprost 0.01% and Hypromellose 0.3%16.716.216.0
Travoprost 0.004% and Timolol 0.5%15.415.615.4

[back to top]

Mean IOP at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye (study eye) was used for the analysis. (NCT02140060)
Timeframe: Week 6, 8 AM, 10 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM, and 8 PM

,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
8 AM10 AM12 PM4PM8 PM, n=44, 44, 44, 43, 45, 43
AZOPT22.019.719.519.119.3
TRAV Z19.317.417.217.617.3
TRAV Z + AZOPT20.318.218.018.018.1
TravA/Brinz20.218.918.918.518.4
TravB/Brinz18.717.217.317.517.5
TravC/Brinz19.918.217.717.317.2

[back to top]

Summary of Change From Baseline Average Intraocular Pressure Diurnal Measurement by Treatment Group Population (Cohort 1)

Average intraocular pressure (IOP) diurnal measurement is calculated by taking the average of the intraocular pressure measurements at 8AM, 10AM and 4PM. The protocol was later amended (Amendment 09) to a safety only study so the diurnal measurements were no longer collected for Cohorts 2 and 3; only the 8AM IOP was collected as a safety assessment only. (NCT02371746)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 25

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Cohort 1 - Group 1-5.10
Cohort 1 - Group 2-6.65
Cohort 1 - Group 3-3.17
Cohort 1 - Group 4-5.67

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at 11:00 at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry at 11:00 AM. A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02419508)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineChange from baseline
SIMBRINZA + PGA22.4-7.0
Vehicle + PGA22.6-2.4

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at 09:00 at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry at 09:00 AM. Baseline is defined as the average of the 9:00 hour values at both Eligibility visits. A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02419508)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineChange from baseline
SIMBRINZA + PGA23.4-4.9
Vehicle + PGA23.4-2.5

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in IOP at 11:00 at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry at 11:00 AM. A more negative percent change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02419508)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
SIMBRINZA + PGA-31.3
Vehicle + PGA-10.8

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry and averaged over the 09:00 AM and 11:00 AM time points. A more negative percent change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02419508)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
SIMBRINZA + PGA-24.7
Vehicle + PGA-9.5

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline at 09:00 at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry at 9:00 AM. Baseline is defined as the average of the 9:00 hour values at both Eligibility visits.A more negative percent change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02419508)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
SIMBRINZA + PGA-21.0
Vehicle + PGA-10.9

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal IOP at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry and averaged over the 09:00 AM and 11:00 AM time points. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02419508)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SIMBRINZA + PGA17.2
Vehicle + PGA20.9

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline (on PGA) in Diurnal IOP (Mean of 09:00 and 11:00 Time Points) at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry and averaged over the 09:00 AM and 11:00 AM time points. A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02419508)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SIMBRINZA + PGA-5.6
Vehicle + PGA-2.1

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in IOP (09:00, 11:00) at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry. A more negative percentage change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. Only one eye (study eye) was used for the analyses. (NCT02730871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Percent change at 9:00 HrPercent change at 11:00 Hr
Simbrinza + Duotrav-20.2-25.0
Vehicle + Duotrav-14.1-11.7

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP (09:00, 11:00) at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry. A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. Only one eye (study eye) was used for the analyses. (NCT02730871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline 9:00 HrBaseline 11:00 HrChange from Baseline 9:00 HrChange from Baseline 11:00 Hr
Simbrinza + Duotrav22.221.4-4.4-5.4
Vehicle + Duotrav22.521.4-3.2-2.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) (Mean of Changes at 09:00 and 11:00 Time Points) at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Diurnal IOP change was defined as the average of the two changes from baseline (timepoints 9 AM, 11 AM). A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. Only one eye (study eye) was used for the analyses. (NCT02730871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Simbrinza + Duotrav-4.5
Vehicle + Duotrav-2.4

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal IOP at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Diurnal IOP was defined as the average of the two time points measured (9 AM, 11 AM). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye (study eye) was used for the analyses. (NCT02730871)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Simbrinza + Duotrav17.1
Vehicle + Duotrav19.4

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Diurnal IOP percentage change was defined as the average of the two changes from baseline (timepoints 9 AM, 11 AM). A more negative percentage change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. Only one eye (study eye) was used for the analyses. (NCT02730871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Simbrinza + Duotrav-20.7
Vehicle + Duotrav-11.1

[back to top]

IOP (mmHg) Change From Baseline at Week 12

Change from baseline in IOP (measured in mmHg) at week 12. Negative values represent reductions in IOP from baseline. (NCT02754596)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Travoprost Intraocular Implant, High Elution-8.3
Travoprost Intraocular Implant, Low Elution-7.7
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.5%-7.5

[back to top]

Severe Adverse Events

The number and percent of subjects with severe adverse events in the study eye (NCT02754596)
Timeframe: Post-op through Month 36

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Travoprost Intraocular Implant, High Elution2
Travoprost Intraocular Implant, Low Elution2
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.5%2

[back to top]

Comfort and Intolerance to the Drops Questionnaire

"Patients will be asked about:~Difficulties related to administration of the drops~Compliance to the drops~Side effects such as foreign body sensation, blurry vision, conjunctival redness, dry eyes, teary eyes, eye pain, eye pruritis, and a peri-ocular rash" (NCT02796560)
Timeframe: After 3 weeks of either the brand name or generic travoprost

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Did you have difficulties with the treatment?72550977Did you have difficulties with the treatment?72550978Did you feel a burning sensation when administerin72550977Did you feel a burning sensation when administerin72550978Did your vision get blurry when administering the72550977Did your vision get blurry when administering the72550978Did your eyes get red when administering the drops72550978Did your eyes get red when administering the drops72550977Are your eyes dry?72550977Are your eyes dry?72550978Do you get tearing or secretions in your eyes?72550977Do you get tearing or secretions in your eyes?72550978When you feel pain in your eyes when administering72550977When you feel pain in your eyes when administering72550978Do your eyes itch when administering the drops?72550977Do your eyes itch when administering the drops?72550978Do you get a rash on the skin around your eyes?72550977Do you get a rash on the skin around your eyes?72550978
AbsentSevereMild
Generic Travoprost6
Brand Name Travoprost5
Generic Travoprost5
Brand Name Travoprost65
Generic Travoprost59
Generic Travoprost16
Brand Name Travoprost53
Generic Travoprost51
Brand Name Travoprost13
Generic Travoprost12
Brand Name Travoprost56
Generic Travoprost58
Brand Name Travoprost8
Generic Travoprost8
Brand Name Travoprost16
Generic Travoprost20
Brand Name Travoprost46
Generic Travoprost42
Generic Travoprost3
Brand Name Travoprost7
Generic Travoprost57
Brand Name Travoprost1
Generic Travoprost2
Brand Name Travoprost10
Generic Travoprost10
Brand Name Travoprost59
Brand Name Travoprost3
Brand Name Travoprost4
Generic Travoprost7
Brand Name Travoprost63
Generic Travoprost63
Brand Name Travoprost22
Generic Travoprost27
Brand Name Travoprost44
Generic Travoprost43
Brand Name Travoprost0
Generic Travoprost0
Generic Travoprost1
Brand Name Travoprost69
Generic Travoprost69

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure

(NCT02796560)
Timeframe: After 3 weeks of either the brand name or generic travoprost

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Brand Name Travoprost18.20
Generic Travoprost18.44

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

Number of Participants with Serious Adverse Events (NCT02914509)
Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 23 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
OTX-TP (Sustained Release Travoprost) Intracanalicular Depot7
Placebo Vehicle (PV)6

[back to top]

Mean IOP

(NCT02914509)
Timeframe: Mean IOP at 8AM, 10AM, and 4PM at the 12 Week Visit

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
8AM10AM4PM
OTX-TP (Sustained Release Travoprost) Intracanalicular Depot22.821.721.4
Placebo Vehicle (PV)23.222.522.1

[back to top]

Mean IOP

(NCT02914509)
Timeframe: Mean IOP at 8AM, 10AM, and 4PM at the 6 Week Visit

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
8AM10AM4PM
OTX-TP (Sustained Release Travoprost) Intracanalicular Depot21.925.124.8
Placebo Vehicle (PV)26.92524.6

[back to top]

Mean IOP

(NCT02914509)
Timeframe: Mean IOP at 8AM, 10AM, and 4PM at the 2 Week Visit

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
8AM10AM4PM
OTX-TP (Sustained Release Travoprost) Intracanalicular Depot2120.219.5
Placebo Vehicle (PV)22.921.921.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months Postoperative

"Change from time-matched baseline in IOP at 8AM and 10AM at Day 10, Week 6 and Month 3.~Day 10 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Day 10 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP; Week 6 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Week 6 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP; Month 3 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Month 3 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP." (NCT03519386)
Timeframe: 3 months

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Day 10, 8AMDay 10, 10AMWeek 6, 8AMWeek 6, 10AMMonth 3, 8AMMonth 3, 10AM
Control Group-7.69-7.20-7.09-6.85-6.69-6.52
Implant Group 1-8.40-8.35-7.34-7.59-6.59-6.56
Implant Group 2-8.48-8.44-7.26-7.62-6.59-6.68

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP (as Measured at 8AM and 10AM) Through 3 Months Postoperative

"Change from time-matched baseline in IOP at 8AM and 10AM at Day 10, Week 6 and Month 3.~Day 10 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Day 10 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP; Week 6 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Week 6 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP; Month 3 8AM IOP minus Baseline 8AM IOP; Month 3 10AM IOP minus Baseline 10AM IOP." (NCT03868124)
Timeframe: 3 Months

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Day 10, 8AMDay 10, 10AMWeek 6, 8AMWeek 6, 10AMMonth 3, 8AMMonth 3, 10AM
Control Group-7.16-7.08-7.17-7.15-6.82-6.76
Implant Group 1-8.26-8.20-6.83-6.92-6.29-6.21
Implant Group 2-8.40-8.28-7.20-6.83-6.66-6.79

[back to top]

Eye Comfort Index

It is a questionnaire designed to measure the irritation of the ocular surface with Rasch analysis to produce estimates on a linear scale of intervals (ratings: 0-100).The Eye comfort index contains items that focus on the discomfort associated with alterations of the ocular surface.(0: None discomfort, 100: high discomfort). (NCT03965052)
Timeframe: will be evaluated at the end of the treatment, at the final visit (day 11)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
PRO-17926.61
Travatan®28.97

[back to top]

Number of Eyes of Chemosis

The chemosis will be evaluated, as a nominal variable, by direct observation and it will be staged as present and absent, where the normality is that said variable is absent. (NCT03965052)
Timeframe: will be evaluated at the end of the treatment, at the final visit (day 11)

Interventioneyes (Count of Units)
PRO-1790
Travatan®0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

primary security variable the adverse events will be evaluated with a scale of Present / Absent, it is a nominal variable, the normal value is absent. it will be evaluated by the number of reported cases per group. (NCT03965052)
Timeframe: during the 14 days of evaluation, including the safety call (day 14).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PRO-17910
Travatan®11

[back to top]

Visual Ability

"The visual capacity variable will be reported using as a unit of measure a fraction, this is taken from a visual test with the Snellen primer, it is a Nominal type variable. where the optimal vision is 20/20 and the worst vision is 20/200, higher values represent a worst vision. The result of the Snellen chart has equivalents in an international logarithmic system called Logmar (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) for better understanding.~Snellen Scale: 20/200, 20/100, 20/50, 20/40, 20/30, 20/25, 20/20, 20/15, 20/12, 20/10.~Snellen / LogMAR equivalences: 20/200= 1.0, 20/100=0.7, 20/50=0.4, 20/40=0.3, 20/30=0.2, 20/25=0.1, 20/20=0.0, 20/15=0.13, 20/12=0.2, 20/10=-0.3, etc." (NCT03965052)
Timeframe: will be evaluated at the end of the treatment, at the final visit (day 11)

InterventionLogMAR (Mean)
PRO-1790.0
Travatan®0.0

[back to top]

Changes in Intraocular Pressure

the intraocular pressure will be evaluated by means of the Goldman applanation tonometry whose unit of measurement is millimeters of mercury (mmHg), it is a continuous variable and its normality range is between 11 - 21 mmHg (NCT03965052)
Timeframe: will be evaluated at the end of the treatment, at the final visit (day 11)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
PRO-17911.95
Travatan®10.71

[back to top]

Percentage of Eyes With Conjunctival Hyperemia (CH) by Grade

Conjunctival hyperemia will be evaluated as an ordinal variable, by direct observation and staged using the Efron scale as Normal / Very Light / Mild / Moderate / Severe. Based on this scale, the normal and mild stages are considered without pathologies or normal. Mild, moderate and severe are considered pathological. (NCT03965052)
Timeframe: will be evaluated at the end of the treatment, at the final visit (day 11)

,
Interventioneyes (Count of Units)
Normal (0)Very mild (1)Mild (2)Moderate (3)Severe (4)
PRO-179142600
Travatan®162600

[back to top]

Number of Eyes With Epithelial Defects by Grade

The epithelial defects will be evaluated by means of two stains, lissamine green and fluorescein, it is a discrete variable that will be realized by direct observation, it will be staged according to the degrees of the oxford scale that go from 0 to 5 (0-V) according to its severity, where 0 is the normal lower limit and 5 the upper limit of defects. (NCT03965052)
Timeframe: will be evaluated at the end of the treatment, at the final visit (day 11)

,
Interventioneyes (Count of Units)
Green lissamine grade 0Green lissamine grade 1Green lissamine grade 2Green lissamine grade 3Green lissamine grade 4Fluorescein grade 0Fluorescein grade 1Fluorescein grade 2Fluorescein grade 3Fluorescein grade 4
PRO-179220000202000
Travatan®231000204000

[back to top]

Ocular Safety

Number of subjects with Adverse Events including intra-operative and post-operative events (TEAE's) in the study eye (NCT04615403)
Timeframe: 12 Months

Interventionsubjects (Number)
Implantation and Exchange13

[back to top]

Mean Percent Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Change

Mean percent change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) from baseline to days 90 (NCT04962009)
Timeframe: day 90

Interventionmean % Intraocular Pressure (IOP) change (Mean)
Travoprost Evolute® (Travoprost Punctal Plug Delivery System, T-PPDS), 166 ug-14.6

[back to top]