Page last updated: 2024-11-04

loratadine

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Occurs in Manufacturing Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Loratadine is a non-sedating antihistamine that acts as a selective antagonist of peripheral H1-receptors. It is used for the relief of symptoms associated with seasonal allergic rhinitis, chronic idiopathic urticaria, and other allergic conditions. Loratadine is synthesized through a multi-step process involving the condensation of a pyridyl ketone with a substituted benzyl chloride. The resulting compound is then reacted with an amine to form the final product. Loratadine is effective in blocking the actions of histamine, a chemical released by the body during an allergic reaction. It is a commonly prescribed antihistamine due to its effectiveness and lack of sedative effects. It is studied to improve understanding of its pharmacological properties, therapeutic applications, and potential side effects. '

Loratadine: A second-generation histamine H1 receptor antagonist used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria. Unlike most classical antihistamines (HISTAMINE H1 ANTAGONISTS) it lacks central nervous system depressing effects such as drowsiness. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

loratadine : A benzocycloheptapyridine that is 6,11-dihydro-5H-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridine substituted by a chloro group at position 8 and a 1-(ethoxycarbonyl)piperidin-4-ylidene group at position 11. It is a H1-receptor antagonist commonly employed in the treatment of allergic disorders. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID3957
CHEMBL ID998
CHEBI ID6538
SCHEMBL ID4596
MeSH IDM0026329

Synonyms (366)

Synonym
BIDD:GT0198
MLS001148466
HY-17043
HMS3268M16
HMS3393G11
BRD-K82795137-001-02-3
BRD-K82795137-001-10-6
smr000058255
DIVK1C_000792
KBIO1_000792
NCI60_041473
loratidine
ethyl 4-(8-chloro-5,6-dihydro-11h-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridin-11-ylidene)piperidine-1-carboxylate
ethyl 4-{13-chloro-4-azatricyclo[9.4.0.0^{3,8}]pentadeca-1(11),3(8),4,6,12,14-hexaen-2-ylidene}piperidine-1-carboxylate
bdbm22876
chembl998 ,
1-piperidenecarboxylic acid,6-duhydro-11h-benzo [5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]-pyridin-11-ylidene)-, ethyl ester
79794-75-5
nsc721075
loratadine
claritin
nsc-721075
EU-0100680
loratadine, >=98% (hplc), powder
velodan
restamine
zeos
loracert
clarinase reperabs
sensibit
aerotina
anhissen
children's claritin
loratadina [spanish]
loratadinum [latin]
claratyne
ethyl 4-(8-chloro-5,6-dihydro-11h-benzo(5,6)cyclohepta(1,2-b)pyridin-11-ylidene)-1-piperidinecarboxylate
loranox
claritin reditab
loritine
polaratyne
loradif
sohotin
loratyne
SPECTRUM_001496
sinhistan dy
sanelor
loradex
lergy
pylor
bedix loratadina
clarityne
clarityn
versal
loraver
histaloran
tadine
lesidas
hsdb 3578
lorantis
bonalerg
lowadina
lorastine
lisino
optimin
alerpriv
biloina
clarityne dy repetabs
claritine
talorat dy
claritin reditabs
sch 29851
nularef
lorfast
clarityne-d
allertidin
fristamin
lertamine
sch-29851
civeran
1-piperidinecarboxylic acid, 4-(8-chloro-5,6-dihydro-11h-benzo(5,6)cyclohepta(1,2-b)pyridin-11-ylidene)-, ethyl ester
NCGC00015619-01
lopac-l-9664
tocris-1944
NCGC00023125-02
alavert
BSPBIO_002300
LOPAC0_000680
MLS000758260
DB00455
D00364
claritin (tn)
loratadine (jan/usp/inn)
OPREA1_027965
NCGC00023125-05
NCGC00023125-07
MLS000069647 ,
KBIO3_001520
KBIO2_001976
KBIOGR_000693
KBIOSS_001976
KBIO2_004544
KBIO2_007112
SPBIO_001548
SPECTRUM2_001584
SPECTRUM4_000177
NINDS_000792
SPECTRUM3_000740
SPECTRUM1503712
SPECTRUM5_001650
IDI1_000792
NCGC00023125-04
NCGC00015619-02
NCGC00023125-06
NCGC00015619-06
AC-2086
L 9664 ,
HMS2090O18
4-(8-chloro-5,6-dihydro-11h-benzo[5,6]cycloheptal[1,2-b]pyridin-11-ylidene-1-piperidinecarboxylic acid ethyl ester
HMS2051G11
HMS2093I15
L0223
NCGC00015619-10
nsc-758628
bay76-2211
L000667
HMS502H14
loratadine-d5
NCGC00015619-09
HMS3262G21
claritin hives relief reditab
loratadinum
loratadine [usan:usp:inn:ban]
loratadina
claritin hives relief
7ajo3bo7qn ,
nsc 721075
topcare childrens allergy relief
bactimicina allergy
unii-7ajo3bo7qn
nsc 758628
loratadine redidose
cas-79794-75-5
dtxsid2023224 ,
tox21_301532
dtxcid903224
NCGC00255171-01
STK574925
BBL010757
nsc758628
MLS001423984
pharmakon1600-01503712
tox21_110185
HMS2235G23
CCG-39362
CCG-100786
NCGC00015619-05
NCGC00015619-03
NCGC00015619-08
NCGC00015619-04
NCGC00015619-11
NCGC00015619-07
NCGC00015619-12
AKOS005499513
BCP9000858
BCP0726000007
FT-0627976
LP00680
AB06849
loratadine [jan]
loratadine [usp-rs]
loratadine [vandf]
loratadine [mart.]
loratadine component of claritin-d
claritin-d component loratadine
loratadine [orange book]
loratadine [ep impurity]
loratadine [inn]
loratadine [ep monograph]
loratadine [who-dd]
ethyl 4-(8-chloro-5,6-dihydro-11h-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridin-11-ylidene)-1-piperidinecarboxylate
loratadine [usan]
loratadine [mi]
loratadine [usp monograph]
loratadine [hsdb]
CS-0887
S1358
ethyl 4-(8-chloro-5,6-dihydrobenzo[1,2]cyclohepta[2,4-b]pyridin-11-ylidene)piperidine-1-carboxylate
gtpl7216
HMS3371D13
DL-436
8-chloro-6,11-dihydro-11-(1- ethoxycarbonyl-4-piperidylidene)-5h-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridine
4-(8-chloro-5,6-dihydrobenzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridin-11-ylidene)piperidine-1-carboxylic acid ethyl ester
8-chloro-6,11-dihydro-11-(1-ethoxycarbonyl-4-piperidylidene)-5h-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridine
11-[n-(ethoxycarbonyl)-4-piperidylidene]-8-chloro-6,11-dihydro-5h-benzo-[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridine
8-chloro-11-(1-ethoxycarbonyl-4-piperidylidene)-6,11-dihydro-5h-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridine
NC00036
SCHEMBL4596
tox21_110185_1
NCGC00015619-13
KS-1079
AB00053224-15
AB00053224-16
tox21_500680
NCGC00261365-01
REGID_FOR_CID_3957
4-(8-chloro-5,6-dihydro-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridin-11-ylidene)-piperidine-1-carboxylic acid ethyl ester
4-(8-chloro-5,6-dihydro-11h-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridin-11-ylidene)-1-piperidinecarboxylic acid ethyl ester
Q-100833
ethyl 4-(8-chloro-5,6-dihydro-11h-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridin-11-ylidine)-1-piperidinecarboxylate
1-piperidinecarboxylic acid, 4-(8-chloro-5,6-dihydro-11h-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridin-11-ylidene)-, ethyl ester
AB00053224_18
OPERA_ID_1868
AB00053224_17
mfcd00672869
ethyl 4-(13-chloro-4-azatricyclo[9.4.0.03,8]pentadeca-1(11),3(8),4,6,12,14-hexaen-2-ylidene)piperidine-1-carboxylate
SR-01000075968-1
sr-01000075968
loratadine, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
HMS3654L17
klaritin
flonidan
cronopen
ethyl 4-(8-chloro-5,6-dihydrobenzo[1,2]cyclohepta[3,4-b]pyridin-11-ylidene)piperidine-1-carboxylate
loratadine, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
loratadine, pharmaceutical secondary standard; certified reference material
loratadine for system suitability, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
loratadine 0.1 mg/ml in methanol
CHEBI:6538 ,
SR-01000075968-6
SR-01000075968-3
SR-01000075968-4
SBI-0050659.P003
HMS3714E09
loratadine, british pharmacopoeia (bp) reference standard
SW197416-3
loratadine impurity c;4-(4,8-dichloro-5,6-dihydro-11h-benzo(5,6)cyclohepta(1,2-b)pyridin-11-ylidene)-1-piperidinecarboxylic acid ethyl ester
BCP22338
Q424049
SY052751
HMS3676N06
loratadine,(s)
HMS3412N06
AMY15355
ethyl 4-{13-chloro-4-azatricyclo[9.4.0.0,3,8]pentadeca-1(11),3(8),4,6,12,14-hexaen-2-ylidene}piperidine-1-carboxylate
EN300-119520
SDCCGSBI-0050659.P004
1-piperidinecarboxylic acid,4-(8-chloro-5,6-dihydro-11h-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridin-11-ylidene)-, ethyl ester
1398065-63-8
NCGC00015619-26
loratadinei-m173(l13)
loratadinei-p80(l13)
loratadine-form2-he
loratadine-form1
loratadinei-m100(l13)
loratadinei-0deg(l13)
loratadinei-p25
BL164637
loratadine- bio-x
Z1521553845
topcare allergy relief24 hour
best choice childrens loratadinesugar free
loratadine (usan:usp:inn:ban)
loratadine allergy relief10mg
equalinechildrens loratadine
good sensechildrens loratadine
medicine shoppe loratadine allergy relief
healthmart loratadine odt
allergy relief non drowsy
wal-itin allergy relief
leader loratadine
healthmartchildrens loratadine
loratadine (usp-rs)
claritin chewable
lil drug store claritin
loratadine od
loratadineantihistamineantihistamine
childrens loratadine
family wellness allergy relief
24 / 7 life non-drowsy allergy relief
dye-free childrens loratadine
equate childrens allergy
best choice childrens loratadine
childrens allergysugar free
loratadine oral
claritinliqui-gels
claritinreditabs
equaline childrens allergy relief
loratadinum (latin)
loratadine (mart.)
loratadine softgels
live betterloratadine
alavert allergy
childrens non-drowsyallergy relief 24-hour
loratadineantihistamine
premier valuechildrens loratadine
counteractallergy
members mark aller-itin
wal itin
medi first plus allergy relief
hy-veechildrens loratadine
alavertallergy
claritin, bsx
loratadine 10mg
dg health childrens allergy relief
claritin, cvpnon-drowsy, 24 hour
non-drowsy allergy relief, 24-7 life
rexall allergy reliefnon drowsy
sunmark childrens loratadine srp sf grape
mckesson loratadine
allergy relief10 mg
rexall allergy relief
loratadine tablet
claritin, cvp
r06ax13
topcarechildrens loratadine
loratadine 10 mg
allerclear
meijerchildrens 24 hour allergy
careall loratadine
childrens walitin
sunmark loratadine
sunmark loratadine odt
kirkland signature allerclear
childrens non-drowsy24-hour allergy relief
good sense childrens allergy relief
berkley and jensen childrens allergy relief
health mart loratadine
loratadine tablets
dg health childrens allergy
loratadinenon drowsy
lil drug store claritinnon-drowsy, 24 hour
non drowsy allergy relief
caring mill allergy relief
handy solutions 24 hour allergy
medi-first plus allery relief
allergy relief10mg
careone allergy relief24 hour
claritin chewablecool mint flavor
help i have allergies
loradamed
leader allergy relief
guardian loratadine
children claritin
loratadine (usp monograph)
good neighbor pharmacy loratadine
childrens loratadine oral
non-drowsy allergy relief
care onechildrens loratadine
sunmarkchildrens loratadine
loratadine odt
loratadine allergy relief
first aid direct allergy relief
medique loradamed
equaline allergy relief
good neighbor pharmacychildrens loratadine
welby all day allergy relief
loratadine (ep impurity)
childrens wal-itin
loratadine (ep monograph)
wal-itin
allervarx
childrens loratadinesugar free
childrens loratadine odt
children claritinallergy
claritin, bsxnon-drowsy, 24 hour

Research Excerpts

Overview

Loratadine (LTD) is a Biopharmaceutical Classification System II basic drug with pH-sensitive aqueous solubility and dissolution is a speed-limiting step of its absorption. Deslorat adine is an antiallergic drug with species-dependent metabolic profiles in mice, rats, monkeys and humans.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Loratadine (LTD) is a Biopharmaceutical Classification System II basic drug with pH-sensitive aqueous solubility and dissolution is a speed-limiting step of its absorption. "( Simultaneous Determination of Loratadine and Its Metabolite Desloratadine in Beagle Plasma by LC-MS/MS and Application for Pharmacokinetics Study of Loratadine Tablets and Omeprazole‑Induced Drug-Drug Interaction.
Li, X; Wang, W; Wang, Y; Wu, W; Xu, Q; Zhang, J; Zhang, T; Zhang, Y, 2021
)
2.35
"Loratadine is an anti-histamine routinely used for treating allergies. "( Anti-Inflammatory Activities of an Anti-Histamine Drug, Loratadine, by Suppressing TAK1 in AP-1 Pathway.
Cho, JY; Hunto, ST; Jang, J; Kim, HG; Kim, JW; Lee, HP, 2022
)
2.41
"Loratadine (LORA), is a topical antihistamine utilized in the treatment of ocular symptoms of COVID-19. "( Fabrication of nanostructured lipid carriers ocugel for enhancing Loratadine used in treatment of COVID-19 related symptoms: statistical optimization,
Abdelmonem, R; Al-Samadi, IEI; El Nashar, RM; El-Nabarawi, MA; Jasti, BR, 2022
)
2.4
"Desloratadine is an antiallergic drug with species-dependent metabolic profiles in mice, rats, monkeys and humans."( Metabolism of desloratadine by chimeric TK-NOG mice transplanted with human hepatocytes.
Higuchi, Y; Suemizu, H; Uehara, S; Yamazaki, H; Yoneda, N, 2020
)
1.41
"Desloratadine is a frequently used drug for the treatment of allergic disorders, which often also require treatment during pregnancy. "( Desloratadine Use During Pregnancy and Risk of Adverse Fetal Outcomes: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
Andersen, JT; Andersson, NW; Poulsen, HE, 2020
)
1.8
"Loratadine is an antihistamine drug that shows promise as an anti-inflammatory drug, but supportive studies are lacking. "( Loratadine, an antihistamine drug, exhibits anti-inflammatory activity through suppression of the NF-
Baek, KS; Cho, JY; Hunto, ST; Jeong, D; Kim, E; Kim, HG; Kim, JH, 2020
)
3.44
"Desloratadine is a drug with a phenotypic polymorphism in metabolism and has been approved for use in many countries to treat allergic diseases. "( A Randomized Study on the Bioequivalence of Desloratadine in Healthy Chinese Subjects and the Association of Different Metabolic Phenotypes With UGT2B10 and CYP2C8 Genotypes.
Dong, W; Fang, Y; Guo, D; Li, Y; Liu, G; Niu, S; Shen, T; Wang, J; Wang, Q; Xia, L; Zhang, M; Zhang, T, 2020
)
1.44
"Loratadine is a selective H1 receptor inhibitor that has been widely used in the clinical treatment of allergic diseases. "( Preparation of loratadine nanocrystal tablets to improve the solubility and dissolution for enhanced oral bioavailability.
Aisha, M; Huang, F; Li, J; Sun, M; Wang, H; Wu, J; Zhou, Y, 2021
)
2.42
"Loratadine is an important anti-allergic drug. "( On the binding reaction of loratadine with human serum acute phase protein alpha 1-acid glycoprotein.
Ajmal, MR; Alalawy, AI; Almutairi, FM; Khan, RH; Siddiqi, MK, 2022
)
2.46
"Loratadine (LTD) is an antihistaminic drug that suffers limited solubility, poor oral bioavailability (owing to extensive first-pass metabolism), and highly variable oral absorption. "( Loratadine bioavailability via buccal transferosomal gel: formulation, statistical optimization, in vitro/in vivo characterization, and pharmacokinetics in human volunteers.
Abou-Taleb, HA; El Menshawe, SF; Elkarmalawy, MH; Elkomy, MH, 2017
)
3.34
"Loratadine is a selective inverse agonist of peripheral histamine H1-receptors. "( Screening and evaluation of fungal resources for loratadine metabolites.
Keerthana, M; Vidyavathi, M, 2018
)
2.18
"Desloratadine is a frequently used second-generation antihistamine considered to be effective and safe for the treatment of allergic diseases."( Seizures induced by desloratadine, a second-generation antihistamine: clinical observations.
Cerminara, C; Curatolo, P; El-Malhany, N; Lo Castro, A; Roberto, D, 2013
)
1.21
"Desloratadine is a biologically active metabolite of second-generation antihistamine loratadine. "( Safety evaluation of desloratadine in allergic rhinitis.
González-Núñez, V; Mullol, J; Valero, A, 2013
)
1.32
"Loratadine (LOR) is a new generation antihistamine used in the treatment of allergic disorders."( Investigation of cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of the antihistaminic drug, loratadine, on human lymphocytes.
Atlı Şekeroğlu, Z; Kontaş, S, 2015
)
2.09
"Desloratadine is a novel, long-acting inhibitor of histamine."( Effects of desloratadine citrate disodium injection on rat models of ovalbumin-induced allergic rhinitis: involvement of T-cell responses modulation.
Ghosh, A; He, G; Jie, Q; Wu, Y; Yuan, X, 2015
)
1.29
"Desloratadine is a biologically active metabolite of loratadine which is indicated for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. "( The role of endothelin-1 and endothelin receptor antagonists in allergic rhinitis inflammation: ovalbumin-induced rat model.
Halici, Z; Kose, D; Polat, E; Tatar, A; Yayla, M; Yoruk, O, 2016
)
1.06
"Loratadine (LOR) is an active component of the second generation of selective antihistaminic pharmaceutical usually known as Claritin."( Theoretical investigation of loratadine reactivity in order to understand its degradation properties: DFT and MD study.
Abramović, BF; Armaković, S; Armaković, SJ, 2016
)
1.45
"Desloratadine is a non-sedating, long-acting histamine H(1) receptor antagonist indicated for the symptomatic relief of allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic idiopathic urticaria in patients aged>12 years."( Examining the tolerability of the non-sedating antihistamine desloratadine: a prescription-event monitoring study in England.
Layton, D; Shakir, SA; Wilton, L, 2009
)
1.21
"Loratadine is a long-acting tricyclic antihistamine with selective peripheral histamine H(1)-receptor antagonist activity. "( A retrospective, open-label analysis of the population pharmacokinetics of a single 10-mg dose of loratadine in healthy white Jordanian male volunteers.
Idkaidek, NM; Najib, NM; Salem, II, 2010
)
2.02
"Loratadine is an important active pharmaceutical ingredient used in a wide variety of prescription and over-the-counter products for the treatment and relief of allergy symptoms. "( Development and validation of a novel stability-indicating reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography method for assay of loratadine and determination of its related compounds.
Lu, J; Markovich, RJ; Rustum, AM; Wei, YC,
)
1.78
"Loratadine is a class II water-insoluble drug and its dissolution rate and, consequently, absorption are dependent on the gastrointestinal pH. "( Investigating the use of liquisolid compacts technique to minimize the influence of pH variations on loratadine release.
Awad, N; El-Hammadi, M, 2012
)
2.04
"Desloratadine is a new non-sedating H1-receptor agonist."( Desloratidine for the treatment of chronic urticaria.
Monroe, EW, 2002
)
0.83
"Desloratadine appears to be a "me-too" agent, with no major differences compared with other second-generation antihistamines."( Desloratadine: a nonsedating antihistamine.
Kockler, DR; Limon, L, 2003
)
1.56
"Desloratadine is a well-tolerated and effective treatment of CIU."( Efficacy and safety of desloratadine 5 mg once daily in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Bernstein, D; Finn, A; Guerrero, R; Monroe, E; Patel, P; Ratner, P, 2003
)
1.24
"Loratadine is a second-generation histamine H(1)-receptor antagonist, used in the treatment of allergic conditions. "( Pregnancy outcome after gestational exposure to loratadine or antihistamines: a prospective controlled cohort study.
Aharonovich, A; Arnon, J; Diav-Citrin, O; Moerman, L; Ornoy, A; Shechtman, S; Wajnberg, R, 2003
)
2.02
"Desloratadine is a systemic antihistamine indicated for the treatment of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis."( Comparison of ketotifen fumarate ophthalmic solution alone, desloratadine alone, and their combination for inhibition of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model: a double-masked, placebo
Crampton, HJ, 2003
)
1.07
"Loratadine is a second generation histamine H1 receptor antagonist, that has high potency antiallergic properties and is associated with low adverse effects compared with other antihistamines. "( [Acute interstitial nephritis induced by loratadine].
Alvarez Navascués, R; Bastardo, Z; Fernández Díaz, M; Guerediaga, J; Pinto, J; Quiñones, L,
)
1.84
"Desloratadine is a potent, selective, histamine H(1)-receptor antagonist that does not easily cross the blood-brain barrier."( Effects of desloratadine, diphenhydramine, and placebo on driving performance and psychomotor performance measurements.
de Halleux, F; Muntjewerff, ND; Ramaekers, JG; Rikken, GH; Vuurman, EF, 2004
)
1.2
"Desloratadine is a non-sedating antihistamine recently approved for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. "( Identification of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzyme(s) responsible for the glucuronidation of 3-hydroxydesloratadine.
Alton, KB; Alvarez, N; Chowdhury, SK; Ghosal, A; Hapangama, N; Patrick, JE; Su, AD; Yuan, Y; Zbaida, S, 2004
)
1.16
"Desloratadine is a selective H1-antihistamine used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. "( Desloratadine prevents compound 48/80-induced mast cell degranulation: visualization using a vital fluorescent dye technique.
Daly, AF; Harris, AG; Kreutner, W; Taché, Y; Wang, YH; Wei, JY, 2005
)
1.57
"Loratadine is a highly potent, non-sedating, long acting tricyclic, second generation anti-histamine."( To evaluate and compare the effects of first generation anti-histamine (chlorpheniramine maleate) and second generation anti-histamine (loratadine) on isolated trachea of rabbit.
Aamir, K; Ashraf, R; Jalbani, GA; Shaikh, AM; Soomro, FM; Unar, MA, 2004
)
1.25
"Loratadine (L) is a long-acting antihistamine, H1 blocker."( Development of modified-release dosage forms containing loratadine and pseudoephedrine sulfate.
Cal, K; Kupiec, K; Sznitowska, M, 2004
)
1.29
"Loratadine is known to be a substrate for both CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 based on a previous in vitro study. "( Effect of cyp2d6*10 allele on the pharmacokinetics of loratadine in chinese subjects.
Chow, MS; Shi, XJ; Tomlinson, B; Yin, OQ, 2005
)
2.02
"Loratadine is a second-generation histamine H(1)-receptor antagonist used in the treatment of allergic diseases. "( Circadian time-dependent differences in murine tolerance to the antihistaminic agent loratadine.
Aouam, K; Ben Attia, M; Boughattas, NA; Dridi, D; Reinberg, A, 2005
)
2
"Desloratadine is a once-daily, non-sedating, non-impairing, selective histamine H1-receptor antagonist. "( Review of desloratadine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, chronic idiopathic urticaria and allergic inflammatory disorders.
DuBuske, LM, 2005
)
1.32
"Loratadine is a long-acting antihistamine with selective peripheral histamine H(1)-receptor antagonistic activity and fewer sedative effects compared with conventional antihistamines, and is widely used in Mexico. "( Bioavailability of two oral formulations of loratadine 20 mg with concomitant ketoconazole: an open-label, randomized, two-period crossover comparison in healthy Mexican adult volunteers.
de Lago, A; Gómez Silva, M; Gonzàlez-de la Parra, M; Lujàn Rangel, R; Namur, S; Pineyro-Garza, E; Piñeyro-López, A; Reyes-Araiza, R; Torres-Alanís, O; Trejo, D; Wacksman, N, 2006
)
2.04
"Desloratadine is a once-daily oral antihistamine with a favourable sedation profile that is approved for the treatment of AR and CIU."( Adult and paediatric poor metabolisers of desloratadine: an assessment of pharmacokinetics and safety.
Gupta, S; Kantesaria, B; Khalilieh, S; Kim, K; Lorber, R; Lutsky, B; Manitpisitkul, P; Prenner, B; Wang, Z, 2006
)
1.11
"Desloratadine is an H1-histamine antagonist which possesses additional anti-inflammatory properties through inhibition of leukocyte activation and reduction of ICAM-1 expression on mucosal epithelial cells. "( Impact of desloratadine and loratadine on the crosstalk between human keratinocytes and leukocytes: Implications for anti-inflammatory activity of antihistamines.
Behrendt, H; Münster, I; Ring, J; Traidl-Hoffmann, C, 2006
)
1.32
"Desloratadine is a potent antihistamine. "( The effect of regular versus on-demand desloratadine treatment in children with allergic rhinitis.
Adalioglu, G; Dizdar, EA; Dogan, C; Kalayci, O; Keskin, O; Sekerel, BE; Tuncer, A, 2007
)
1.23
"Desloratadine is a rapid-acting, once-daily, nonsedating selective H1-receptor antagonist/inverse receptor agonist with proven clinical efficacy in patients with CIU."( Desloratadine for chronic idiopathic urticaria: a review of clinical efficacy.
DuBuske, L, 2007
)
1.47
"Loratadine is a powerful H1 antagonist commonly employed in the treatment of allergic disorders. "( Inhibitory effect of the H1 antagonist loratadine on histamine release from human basophils.
Lorini, M; Marchesi, E; Miadonna, A; Milazzo, N; Tedeschi, A, 1994
)
2
"Loratadine is a long-acting antihistamine agent, exhibiting partial selectivity for peripheral histamine H1-receptors. "( Loratadine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in allergic disorders.
Fitton, A; Haria, M; Peters, DH, 1994
)
3.17
"Loratadine is an especially effective second-generation H1-receptor antagonist and is comparable to many of the other second-generation antihistamines."( Loratadine. A review of recent findings in pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety, with a look at its use in combination with pseudoephedrine.
Danzig, MR; Roman, IJ, 1993
)
2.45
"Loratadine is a new, highly selective, non sedating, H 1-receptor antagonist, without central nervous system activity. "( [Effectiveness of loratadine vs. placebo in the treatment of urticaria-angioedema syndrome in patients with food allergy].
Biasi, D; Corrocher, R; Cortina, P; Girelli, D; Pacor, ML, 1993
)
2.06
"Loratadine is a new antihistamine without sedative effects."( Effects of loratadine on postural control.
Ledin, T; Möller, C; Odkvist, LM, 1995
)
1.4
"Desloratadine was found to be a competitive antagonist (pA2 = 6.67+/-0.09) of carbachol-induced contractions in isolated rabbit iris smooth muscle."( Anticholinergic effects of desloratadine, the major metabolite of loratadine, in rabbit and guinea-pig iris smooth muscle.
Antón, F; Beleta, J; Cardelús, I; Palacios, JM, 1999
)
1.11
"Desloratadine was shown to be a selective H1 antagonist with more potent antihistaminic activity in vitro than either loratadine or terfenadine (CAS 50679-08-8), as indicated by its displacement of 3H-mepyramine from H1 receptors in rat brain, guinea pig brain, and guinea pig lung, and by its antagonism of histamine-induced contractions of guinea pig ileum."( Preclinical pharmacology of desloratadine, a selective and nonsedating histamine H1 receptor antagonist. 1st communication: receptor selectivity, antihistaminic activity, and antiallergenic effects.
Anthes, J; Barnett, A; Hey, JA; Kreutner, W; Tozzi, S; Young, S, 2000
)
1.11
"Desloratadine is a novel, potent H1-receptor antagonist with additional inhibitory effects on inflammatory mediators such as cytokines and adhesion molecules."( Desloratadine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria.
Gauger, A; Hein, R; Ring, J, 2001
)
1.45
"Desloratadine is a new agent for the treatment of diseases such as seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria. "( The pharmacologic profile of desloratadine: a review.
Henz, BM, 2001
)
1.22
"Desloratadine is a new, potent, nonsedating antihistamine that has an excellent cardiovascular safety profile."( Once-daily desloratadine improves the signs and symptoms of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Bronsky, E; Gauger, A; Hein, R; Miller, B; Ring, J, 2001
)
1.19
"Desloratadine 5 mg daily is a safe and effective treatment for CIU with significant benefits within 24 h and maintained through the treatment period."( Once-daily desloratadine improves the signs and symptoms of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Bronsky, E; Gauger, A; Hein, R; Miller, B; Ring, J, 2001
)
1.29
"Desloratadine is a new, selective, H(1)-receptor antagonist that also has anti-inflammatory activity. "( Desloratadine: A new, nonsedating, oral antihistamine.
Geha, RS; Meltzer, EO, 2001
)
1.55
"Loratadine is a long-acting antihistamine indicated for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria in patients 6 years of age and older. "( High-dose loratadine exposure in a six-year-old child.
Cobb, DB; Fernández, MC; Watson, WA, 2001
)
2.16
"Desloratadine is a biologically active metabolite of the second-generation antihistamine loratadine. "( Pharmacology and clinical efficacy of desloratadine as an anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory drug.
Agrawal, DK, 2001
)
1.2
"Desloratadine is a non-sedating, clinically effective, anti-allergic therapy that has been shown to exhibit anti-inflammatory properties that extend beyond its ability to antagonize histamine at H(1)-receptor sites. "( Inhibition of cytokine generation and mediator release by human basophils treated with desloratadine.
Kreutner, W; Lichtenstein, LM; Schleimer, RP; Schroeder, JT, 2001
)
1.15
"Desloratadine is a new treatment option for patients with IAR and nasal congestion."( Desloratadine reduces nasal congestion in patients with intermittent allergic rhinitis.
Nayak, AS; Schenkel, E, 2001
)
1.45
"Loratadine is a new selective peripheral histamine H1-receptor antagonist, that is orally effective, long-acting, and devoid of significant central and autonomic nervous system activity. "( Comparative effects of loratadine and terfenadine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria.
Belaich, S; Bruttmann, G; DeGreef, H; Lachapelle, JM; Paul, E; Pedrali, P; Tennstedt, D, 1990
)
2.03
"Thus loratadine is an effective and safe antihistamine when given once daily for the symptomatic relief of seasonal allergic rhinitis."( Comparative effects of loratadine and azatadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Katelaris, C, 1990
)
1.04
"Loratadine is a highly selective, long-acting, H1-receptor antagonist. "( Comparison of the effect of loratadine on the airway and skin responses to histamine, methacholine, and allergen in subjects with asthma.
Holgate, ST; Town, GI, 1990
)
2.02
"Loratadine is a new non-sedating antihistamine. "( Antiallergic activity of loratadine, a non-sedating antihistamine.
Chapman, RW; Gulbenkian, A; Kreutner, W; Siegel, MI, 1987
)
2.02
"Loratadine is a long acting antihistamine which has a high selectivity for peripheral histamine H1-receptors and lacks the central nervous system depressant effects often associated with some of the older antihistamines. "( Loratadine. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy.
Clissold, SP; Goa, KL; Sorkin, EM, 1989
)
3.16
"Loratadine is an addition to the class of nonsedating antihistamines which includes terfenadine, astemizole, and acrivastine. "( Loratadine: a nonsedating antihistamine with once-daily dosing.
Barenholtz, HA; McLeod, DC, 1989
)
3.16
"Loratadine appears to be a simple, effective and safe therapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis."( Efficacy and safety of loratadine suspension in the treatment of children with allergic rhinitis.
Andreoli, A; Boner, AL; Marchesi, E; Miglioranzi, P; Richelli, C, 1989
)
1.31
"Loratadine is a promising antihistamine for individuals involved in skilled activity."( Studies on the central effects of the H1-antagonist, loratadine.
Bradley, CM; Nicholson, AN, 1987
)
1.24
"Loratadine is a long-acting H1 antagonist devoid of anticholinergic and sedative effects. "( Double-blind placebo-controlled study of loratadine, mequitazine, and placebo in the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Bousquet, J; Lherminier, M; Michel, FB; Montes, F; Schwab, D; Skassa-Brociek, W; Verdier, M, 1988
)
1.98

Effects

Desloratadine has a half-life of 21-24 h, permitting once-daily dosing. It does not interfere with the bronchodilatory effect of terbutaline in childhood asthma.

Desloratadine has been found to be effective and well tolerated in studies in subjects with symptoms of AR analogous to/consistent with the ARIA definitions of intermittent and persiste.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Loratadine has a mild bronchodilatory effect in the study period and does not interfere with the bronchodilatory effect of terbutaline in childhood asthma."( The bronchodilatory effects of loratadine, terbutaline, and both together versus placebo in childhood asthma.
Baki, A; Orhan, F, 2003
)
2.05
"Desloratadine has a half-life of 21-24 h, permitting once-daily dosing."( The pharmacologic profile of desloratadine: a review.
Henz, BM, 2001
)
1.11
"Desloratadine has an excellent overall safety profile."( Pharmacology and clinical efficacy of desloratadine as an anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory drug.
Agrawal, DK, 2001
)
1.09
"Desloratadine has no effect in attenuating the broncho-constriction caused by exercise in patients with allergic rhinitis and exercise induced broncho-constriction."( Effect of desloratadine on patients with allergic rhinitis and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: a placebo controlled study.
Maharaj, B; Manjra, AI; Nel, H, 2009
)
1.34
"Loratadine 10-mg tablets have been reported to be rapidly absorbed after once-daily administration for 10 days in healthy adult subjects, with a T(max) of 1.3 hours for loratadine and 2.5 hours for its major active metabolite, descarboethoxyloratadine."( A retrospective, open-label analysis of the population pharmacokinetics of a single 10-mg dose of loratadine in healthy white Jordanian male volunteers.
Idkaidek, NM; Najib, NM; Salem, II, 2010
)
1.3
"Desloratadine has demonstrated efficacy in treating SAR symptoms, including nasal obstruction."( Comparative effects of desloratadine versus montelukast on asthma symptoms and use of beta 2-agonists in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma.
Baena-Cagnani, CE; Berger, WE; Danzig, M; DuBuske, LM; Gurné, SE; Lorber, R; Stryszak, P, 2003
)
1.13
"Loratadine has a mild bronchodilatory effect in the study period and does not interfere with the bronchodilatory effect of terbutaline in childhood asthma."( The bronchodilatory effects of loratadine, terbutaline, and both together versus placebo in childhood asthma.
Baki, A; Orhan, F, 2003
)
2.05
"Desloratadine has been approved by the European Medicines Evaluation Agency for the treatment of intermittent and persistent AR, as defined by the ARIA classification."( Desloratadine treatment for intermittent and persistent allergic rhinitis: a review.
Bachert, C; van Cauwenberge, P, 2007
)
1.47
"Desloratadine has been found to be effective and well tolerated in studies in subjects with symptoms of AR analogous to/consistent with the ARIA definitions of intermittent and persistent disease. "( Desloratadine treatment for intermittent and persistent allergic rhinitis: a review.
Bachert, C; van Cauwenberge, P, 2007
)
1.58
"Desloratadine has a half-life of 21-24 h, permitting once-daily dosing."( The pharmacologic profile of desloratadine: a review.
Henz, BM, 2001
)
1.11
"Desloratadine has an excellent overall safety profile."( Pharmacology and clinical efficacy of desloratadine as an anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory drug.
Agrawal, DK, 2001
)
1.09
"Loratadine has one main metabolite, descarbethoxyloratadine, which is four times more active than the parent drug."( Loratadine: a nonsedating antihistamine with once-daily dosing.
Barenholtz, HA; McLeod, DC, 1989
)
2.44

Actions

Desloratadine does not cause sedation or prolong the corrected QT (QTc) interval. It can be administered without regard to concurrent intake of food and grapefruit juice, and appears to have negligible potential for drug interactions mediated by several metabolic systems.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Desloratadine caused an increase in the total antioxidant status level, but it was not statistically significant."( Influence of desloratadine on selected oxidative stress markers in patients between 3 and 10 years of age with allergic perennial rhinitis.
Bieszczad-Bedrejczuk, E; Rachel, M; Sadowska-Woda, I, 2010
)
1.22
"Desloratadine does not cause sedation or prolong the corrected QT (QTc) interval, can be administered without regard to concurrent intake of food and grapefruit juice, and appears to have negligible potential for drug interactions mediated by several metabolic systems."( Desloratadine: an update of its efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.
Goa, KL; Keam, SJ; Murdoch, D, 2003
)
1.45
"Desloratadine displays linear pharmacokinetics after oral administration."( Desloratadine for chronic idiopathic urticaria: a review of clinical efficacy.
DuBuske, L, 2007
)
1.47
"Loratadine inhibited an increase in dye leakage into the nasal cavity in rats.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)"( Effect of loratadine on immediate and delayed type hypersensitivity reactions.
Akagi, M; Izushi, K; Kamei, C; Mio, M; Nakamura, S; Tasaka, K; Yoshida, T, 1995
)
1.41
"Desloratadine did not inhibit IKr channel human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG)-induced current in a study in which HERG was expressed in Xenopus oocytes."( Preclinical pharmacology of desloratadine, a selective and nonsedating histamine H1 receptor antagonist. 2nd communication: lack of central nervous system and cardiovascular effects.
Barnett, A; Chiu, P; Hey, JA; Kreutner, W, 2000
)
1.11
"Loratadine did not inhibit CYP1A2 or CYP3A4 at concentrations up to 3829 ng/ml, which is approximately 815-fold greater than the expected maximal human plasma concentration (4.7 +/- 2.7 ng/ml) following the recommended dose of 10 mg/day."( In vitro characterization of the inhibition profile of loratadine, desloratadine, and 3-OH-desloratadine for five human cytochrome P-450 enzymes.
Barecki, ME; Casciano, CN; Clement, RP; Johnson, WW, 2001
)
1.28

Treatment

Pretreatment with loratadine resulted in a significant inhibition of the histamine-induced changes in both nasal and sinus cavities. Lor atadine pre-treatment of exponentially growing cells (75 microM, 24 hours) increased radiation-induced cytotoxicity.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Desloratadine treatment alleviated AR symptoms, decreased serum level of OVA-specific IgE and IL-17 in AR rats."( Desloratadine Ameliorates Olfactory Disorder and Suppresses AMPA Receptor GluA1 Expression in Allergic Rhinitis Rat.
Huang, Y; Jiang, X; Jiang, Y; Li, N; Li, S; Li, Z; Zhang, J; Zhang, N; Zhang, X; Zhao, H, 2020
)
1.69
"Loratadine treatment inhibited the expression of TxNIP and several components of the NLRP3 inflammasome complex, including NLRP3, ASC, and cleaved caspase 1 (P10)."( Loratadine Alleviates Advanced Glycation End Product-Induced Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Human Chondrocytes.
Gao, F; Zhang, S, 2020
)
2.72
"Loratadine pre-treatment of exponentially growing cells (75 microM, 24 hours) increased radiation-induced cytotoxicity yielding a radiation DMF of 1.95. "( Loratadine dysregulates cell cycle progression and enhances the effect of radiation in human tumor cell lines.
Choudhuri, R; Cook, JA; DeGraff, WG; Mitchell, JB; Simone, NL; Soule, BP, 2010
)
3.25
"Desloratadine treatment was associated with less deterioration from baseline in the mean nasal airflow (P < 0.05) and in the mean severity score for the symptom of nasal obstruction (P < 0.03)."( Impact and modulation of nasal obstruction.
Horak, F, 2002
)
0.83
"Loratadine pretreatment, but neither guanethidine nor indomethacin, reduced edema."( Nociceptive and edematogenic responses elicited by a crude bristle extract of Lonomia obliqua caterpillars.
de Castro Bastos, L; Guimarães, JA; Tonussi, CR; Veiga, AB, 2004
)
1.04
"Desloratadine treatment during allergen exposure reduced allergic symptoms and reduced sinonasal infection (P<0.05)."( Desloratadine partially inhibits the augmented bacterial responses in the sinuses of allergic and infected mice.
Blair, C; Kirtsreesakul, V; Naclerio, RM; Thompson, K; Yu, X, 2004
)
1.46
"Desloratadine treatment during nasal challenge inhibited allergic symptoms and reduced sinonasal infection, suggesting that histamine via an H1 receptor plays a role in the augmented infection in mice with an ongoing allergic reaction."( Desloratadine partially inhibits the augmented bacterial responses in the sinuses of allergic and infected mice.
Blair, C; Kirtsreesakul, V; Naclerio, RM; Thompson, K; Yu, X, 2004
)
1.57
"Loratadine treatment was not more sedative than placebo and was not associated with cardiovascular events."( Prophylactic management of children at risk for recurrent upper respiratory infections: the Preventia I Study.
Adam, D; Bismut, H; Bonini, S; Borres, MP; Canonica, GW; Canseco Gonzalez, C; Czarlewski, W; Danzig, MR; Grimfeld, A; Holgate, ST; Lobaton, P; Patel, P; Roman, I; Szczeklik, A, 2004
)
1.04
"Desloratadine treatment was no different than placebo."( Effect of combined montelukast and desloratadine on the early asthmatic response to inhaled allergen.
Cockcroft, DW; Davis, BE; Todd, DC, 2005
)
1.11
"Desloratadine treatment for 14 days improved nasal airflow and resistance as well as symptom and QOL scores in patients with symptomatic SAR during the allergy season."( Effect of desloratadine therapy on symptom scores and measures of nasal patency in seasonal allergic rhinitis: results of a single-center, placebo-controlled trial.
Harris, AG; Iezzoni, D; Jalowayski, AA; Meltzer, EO; Vogt, K, 2006
)
1.32
"Desloratadine treatment was associated with significant improvements compared with placebo in pruritus scores and in the size of the largest wheals as early as day 1. "( Efficacy and safety of desloratadine in adults with chronic idiopathic urticaria: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial.
Auquier, P; Dreyfus, I; Grob, JJ; Ortonne, JP, 2007
)
1.26
"Desloratadine treatment was associated with significantly greater improvements from baseline to day 42 compared with placebo in DLQI overall score (-6 vs."( Quality of life in adults with chronic idiopathic urticaria receiving desloratadine: a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled study.
Auquier, P; Dreyfus, I; Grob, JJ; Ortonne, JP, 2008
)
1.09
"The loratadine treated group had better results both in nasal symptoms, with a decrease in sneezing (P < 0.000001) and rhinorrhoea (P < 0.006), respectively, corresponding with 73.4% and 66.7% with respect to 46.6% and 26.7% in the control group, and in eosinophil counts which decreased by 20% compared with 14.3% in patients treated with placebo and flunisolide. "( A controlled study on the effectiveness of loratadine in combination with flunisolide in the treatment of nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia (NARES).
Bagnato, GF; Barresi, L; Gangemi, S; Isola, S; Purello-D'Ambrosio, F; Ricciardi, L, 1999
)
1.12
"Desloratadine is a new treatment option for patients with IAR and nasal congestion."( Desloratadine reduces nasal congestion in patients with intermittent allergic rhinitis.
Nayak, AS; Schenkel, E, 2001
)
1.45
"Treatment with loratadine mitigated AGEs-induced oxidative stress, as revealed by suppressed production of mitochondrial ROS and the NADPH oxidase subunit NOX4."( Loratadine Alleviates Advanced Glycation End Product-Induced Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Human Chondrocytes.
Gao, F; Zhang, S, 2020
)
2.34
"Co-treatment with loratadine, and with azelastine highly sensitized KBV20C cells to vincristine treatment. "( Histamine Receptor Antagonists, Loratadine and Azelastine, Sensitize P-gp-overexpressing Antimitotic Drug-resistant KBV20C Cells Through Different Molecular Mechanisms.
Kim, IS; Kim, JY; Kim, KS; Yoon, S, 2019
)
1.13
"Pretreatment with loratadine seems to reduce both the number and severity of systemic reactions in specific cluster immunotherapy."( Antihistamine premedication in specific cluster immunotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Johnsen, CR; Malling, HJ; Mosbech, H; Nielsen, L; Poulsen, LK, 1996
)
0.63
"Treatment with loratadine attenuated early antigen-induced nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, and itching. "( In vivo and ex vivo inhibitory effects of loratadine on histamine release in patients with allergic rhinitis.
Cottini, M; Danzig, M; Miadonna, A; Milazzo, N; Tedeschi, A; Tosi, D, 1998
)
0.92
"Treatment with loratadine resulted in a significant inhibition of the histamine-induced changes in both nasal and sinus cavities."( Comparison of the response to histamine challenge of the nose and the maxillary sinus: effect of loratadine.
Baroody, FM; Blair, C; deTineo, M; Gungor, A; Haney, L; Naclerio, RM, 1999
)
0.86
"Pretreatment with Loratadine resulted in a significant higher allergen threshold dose than placebo (p less than 0.01)."( Protective effect of loratadine on specific conjunctival provocation test.
Buscaglia, S; Canonica, GW; Ciprandi, G; Marchesi, E; Pesce, GP, 1991
)
0.92

Toxicity

Desloratadine has been shown in multiple studies to be safe and effective in relieving the symptoms of AR and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) In the study involving subjects aged 2 years-5 years, the incidence of adverse events was 7/55 for the group treated with deslor atadine and 6/56 for placebo. Loratadin did not show beneficial effect when combined with good topical corticosteroid but it was safe and had no serious side effect on the children.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Loratadine was safe and well tolerated with sedation and dry mouth similar to placebo and significantly less than hydroxyzine."( Relative efficacy and safety of loratadine, hydroxyzine, and placebo in chronic idiopathic urticaria.
Bernstein, DI; Cuss, F; Danzig, MR; Fox, RW; Garvin, PR; Grabiec, SV; Honsinger, RW; Kalivas, JT; Katz, HI; Monroe, EW, 1992
)
1.48
" Loratadine appears to be a simple, effective and safe therapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis."( Efficacy and safety of loratadine suspension in the treatment of children with allergic rhinitis.
Andreoli, A; Boner, AL; Marchesi, E; Miglioranzi, P; Richelli, C, 1989
)
1.5
" Neither terfenadine nor loratadine, another nonsedating antihistamine, potentiated the adverse effects of alcohol on driving performance."( Antihistamines and driving safety.
O'Hanlon, JF, 1988
)
0.58
" Loratadine was found to be both safe and efficacious."( Safety and efficacy of loratadine (Sch-29851): a new non-sedating antihistamine in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Bergner, A; Connell, JT; Dockhorn, RJ; Falliers, CJ; Grabiec, SV; Shellenberger, MK; Weiler, JM, 1987
)
1.49
" All treatments were generally well tolerated with no serious or unusual adverse events."( Comparative efficacy and safety of a once-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination versus its components alone and placebo in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Boggs, P; Bronsky, E; Findlay, S; Gawchik, S; Georgitis, J; Mansmann, H; Meltzer, E; Morris, R; Sholler, L; Wolfe, J, 1995
)
0.55
"05) for controlling nasal symptoms and safe in terms of short term biochemical and haematological changes and adverse effects noted."( Efficacy and safety of loratadine compared with astemizole in Malaysian patients with allergic rhinitis.
Amin, MJ; Lee, ST, 1994
)
0.6
" Few adverse events were reported during the study; all were mild or moderate and were not significantly different between the two treatment groups."( A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of loratadine syrup and terfenadine suspension in the treatment of 3- to 6-year-old children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Klöse, P; Lutsky, BN; Melon, J; Menardo, JL; Molkhou, P; Ronchetti, R; Suonpää, J; Wahn, U; Wessel, F,
)
0.38
" Mild to moderate treatment-related adverse experiences were reported in 7/113 patients (6%) treated with loratadine and 11/119 patients (9%) treated with terfenadine."( Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of loratadine syrup and terfenadine suspension in the treatment of chronic allergic skin diseases in a pediatric population.
Cerio, R; Chieira, ML; deGroot, LJ; Giannetti, A; Gonçalves, HM; Guillot, B; Lutsky, BN; Lynde, CW; Schuller, JL; Vareltzides, A, 1993
)
0.76
" Major and total symptom complex scores, global efficacy and overall satisfaction, and adverse events were assessed."( Comparative outdoor study of the efficacy, onset and duration of action, and safety of cetirizine, loratadine, and placebo for seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Meltzer, EO; Weiler, JM; Widlitz, MD, 1996
)
0.51
" 5 mg loratadine plus 120 mg pseudoephedrine was safe and effective in relieving the symptoms of allergic rhinitis."( [Evaluation of the efficiency and safety of the loratadine with pseudoephedrine combination drug in treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis].
Lipiec, A; Rapiejko, P; Zawisza, E, 1998
)
1.04
" Both compounds were well tolerated, safe and efficacious."( Comparative therapeutic effect and safety of mizolastine and loratadine in chronic idiopathic urticaria. URTILOR study group.
Duarte-Risselin, C; Leynadier, F; Murrieta, M,
)
0.37
" These three antihistamines have also been shown safe in special populations, including pediatric and elderly patients."( Safety of second generation antihistamines.
Philpot, EE,
)
0.13
" Adverse events were recorded."( Comparison of the efficacy, safety and quality of life provided by fexofenadine hydrochloride 120 mg, loratadine 10 mg and placebo administered once daily for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Juniper, EF; Van Cauwenberge, P, 2000
)
0.52
" The incidence of adverse events was low and similar across all treatment groups."( Comparison of the efficacy, safety and quality of life provided by fexofenadine hydrochloride 120 mg, loratadine 10 mg and placebo administered once daily for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Juniper, EF; Van Cauwenberge, P, 2000
)
0.52
"We studied H1 antihistaminic safety, with respect to CNS, and clinical trial validity to determine its adverse effects and generalize the results."( [Data on the safety of antihistaminics obtained from published clinical trials].
González, JL; Rodríguez Paredes, A,
)
0.13
" Patients that use modern antihistaminics have less adverse effects (32."( [Data on the safety of antihistaminics obtained from published clinical trials].
González, JL; Rodríguez Paredes, A,
)
0.13
"Second generation antihistaminics have less adverse effects and similar efficacy than classics ones."( [Data on the safety of antihistaminics obtained from published clinical trials].
González, JL; Rodríguez Paredes, A,
)
0.13
" The most common adverse event for all regimens was headache, reported in 20 (22%) subjects."( Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of desloratadine and fexofenadine when coadministered with azithromycin: a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Batra, V; Clement, R; Gupta, S; Kantesaria, B; Marino, M, 2001
)
0.58
" Loratadine did not show beneficial effect when combined with good topical corticosteroid but it was safe and had no serious side effect on the children."( Therapeutic efficacy and safety of loratadine syrup in childhood atopic dermatitis treated with mometasone furoate 0.1 per cent cream.
Chunharas, A; Viravan, S; Wananukul, S; Wisuthsarewong, W, 2002
)
1.5
"The objective of the study was to evaluate the adverse reactions of Loratadine plus Pseudoephedrine Sulfate Repetabs Tables (LTD+PSE Repetabs) (Loratadine 5 mg + Pseudoephedrine 120 mg) twice daily with that of loratadine (5 mg) twice daily and pseudoephedrine (60 mg) quarter daily in the treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis."( A comparative study of the side effects between pseudoephedrine in Loratadine plus Pseudoephedrine Sulfate Repetabs Tables and loratadine + pseudoephedrine tablet in treatment of allergic rhinitis in Thai patients.
Chochaipanichnon, L; Kerekhanjanarong, V; Saengpanich, S; Supiyaphun, P, 2002
)
0.79
" Desloratadine was safe and well tolerated; adverse events were similar to placebo overall."( Safety and efficacy of desloratadine 5 mg in asthma patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and nasal congestion.
Berger, WE; Mansfield, LE; Schenkel, EJ, 2002
)
1.17
" Loratadine, a newer nonsedating antihistamine, is often used because of its preferred side effect profile."( Fetal safety of loratadine use in the first trimester of pregnancy: a multicenter study.
Addis, A; Bar-Oz, B; Berkovitch, M; Caprara, D; Coutinho, CJ; Jovanovski, E; Koren, G; Moretti, ME; Schüler-Faccini, L, 2003
)
1.58
"We hypothesized that desloratadine, a new, nonsedating selective H1-antihistamine, would be efficacious and safe in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis."( Efficacy and safety of desloratadine in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.
Finn, A; Prenner, BM; Simons, FE, 2003
)
0.93
" Dropouts, and the type and frequency of adverse events (headache, viral infection, pharyngitis, and upper respiratory tract infection), were similar in both treatment groups."( Efficacy and safety of desloratadine in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.
Finn, A; Prenner, BM; Simons, FE, 2003
)
0.62
" The incidence of adverse events, including somnolence, was similar in the desloratadine and placebo groups."( Efficacy and safety of desloratadine 5 mg once daily in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Bernstein, D; Finn, A; Guerrero, R; Monroe, E; Patel, P; Ratner, P, 2003
)
0.85
" Overall, all treatments were safe and well tolerated."( Efficacy and safety of ebastine 20 mg compared to loratadine 10 mg once daily in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Hampel, F; Howland, W; Ratner, P; Van Bavel, J, 2004
)
0.58
" All treatments were well tolerated and no serious adverse events were recorded."( A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, comparing the efficacy and safety of rupatadine (20 and 10 mg), a new PAF and H1 receptor-specific histamine antagonist, to loratadine 10 mg in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Dumur, JP; Izquierdo, I; Pérez, I; Saint-Martin, F, 2004
)
0.52
"The present results suggest that rupatadine 10 mg a day may be a valuable and safe alternative for the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis."( A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, comparing the efficacy and safety of rupatadine (20 and 10 mg), a new PAF and H1 receptor-specific histamine antagonist, to loratadine 10 mg in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Dumur, JP; Izquierdo, I; Pérez, I; Saint-Martin, F, 2004
)
0.52
" There was no significant difference among all groups in the number of patients who reported adverse events."( A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of ebastine (20 mg and 10 mg) to loratadine 10 mg once daily in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Hampel, F; Howland, W; Ratner, P; Van Bavel, J, 2004
)
0.53
" Desloratadine, an oral non-sedating antihistamine, has been shown in multiple studies to be safe and effective in relieving the symptoms of AR and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) in adults and adolescents."( Safety of desloratadine syrup in children.
Bloom, M; Herron, J; Staudinger, H, 2004
)
1.25
" Safety evaluations included adverse event report collection, monitoring of vital signs, clinical laboratory measurements, and standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements."( Safety of desloratadine syrup in children.
Bloom, M; Herron, J; Staudinger, H, 2004
)
0.69
"In the study involving subjects aged 2 years-5 years (n = 111), the incidence of adverse events was 7/55 for the group treated with desloratadine and 6/56 for placebo."( Safety of desloratadine syrup in children.
Bloom, M; Herron, J; Staudinger, H, 2004
)
0.9
" No unusual or unexpected adverse events were reported."( Efficacy and safety of an extended-release formulation of desloratadine and pseudoephedrine vs the individual components in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Grubbe, R; Lutsky, B; Pleskow, W; Weiss, S, 2005
)
0.57
" Although first-generation antihistamines can cause sedation and cognitive impairment, second-generation antihistamines are relatively non-sedating and free of such adverse events owing to their comparative inability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier."( The safety and efficacy of desloratadine for the management of allergic disease.
Berger, WE, 2005
)
0.62
" The most frequently reported adverse events were insomnia, headache, and dry mouth."( Efficacy and safety of desloratadine/pseudoephedrine tablet, 2.5/120 mg two times a day, versus individual components in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Chervinsky, P; Danzig, M; Nayak, A; Rooklin, A,
)
0.43
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
" Adverse events occurred with similar frequency among desloratadine- and placebo-treated patients."( Efficacy and safety of desloratadine in adults with chronic idiopathic urticaria: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial.
Auquier, P; Dreyfus, I; Grob, JJ; Ortonne, JP, 2007
)
0.88
" Eleven treatment-related adverse events, all mild to moderate in severity, were reported."( Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of desloratadine in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment.
Gupta, SK; Kantesaria, B; Wang, Z, 2007
)
0.6
" The efficiency and side-effect were evaluated at the end of treatment."( Efficacy and safety of desloratadine combined with dipyridamole in the treatment of chronic urticaria.
Abdalla, AN; Khalaf, AT; Liu, XM; Sheng, WX; Tan, JQ, 2008
)
0.65
"Aerius is safe and can effectively reduction in nasal and nonnasal symptoms in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis."( [The investigation of efficacy and safety of Aerius to seasonal allergic rhinitis].
Cui, Y; Gao, Q; Liu, Z; Xu, K; You, X, 2008
)
0.35
" Tolerability was based on the recording of adverse events (AEs), physical examination, electrocardiograms, and laboratory screen controls at baseline and the final study visit."( Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of rupatadine when coadministered with azithromycin at steady-state levels: a randomized, open-label, two-way, crossover, Phase I study.
Antonijoan, R; Barbanoj, M; Carbó, ML; Donado, E; Izquierdo, I; Merlos, M; Nadal, T; Peña, J; Solans, A, 2008
)
0.35
" The incidence of treatment emergent adverse events was similar for bilastine (20."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.
Bachert, C; Dimitrov, V; Gorina, MM; Ivan, P; Kuna, P; Loureiro, A; Sanquer, F; van de Heyning, P, 2009
)
0.59
"Bilastine 20 mg once daily was efficacious, safe and not different from desloratadine 5 mg once daily in the treatment of SAR symptoms."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.
Bachert, C; Dimitrov, V; Gorina, MM; Ivan, P; Kuna, P; Loureiro, A; Sanquer, F; van de Heyning, P, 2009
)
0.82
" Adverse events reported during or < or = 30 days after treatment were collected."( Safety and efficacy of desloratadine in chronic idiopathic urticaria in clinical practice: an observational study of 9246 patients.
Augustin, M; Ehrle, S, 2009
)
0.65
" The incidence of adverse events was low (0."( Safety and efficacy of desloratadine in chronic idiopathic urticaria in clinical practice: an observational study of 9246 patients.
Augustin, M; Ehrle, S, 2009
)
0.65
" Subjects treated with L/M experienced a similar incidence of total adverse events versus placebo and a lower incidence of total adverse events (including dizziness, insomnia, jitteriness, nausea, and dry mouth) versus PSE."( Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose loratadine/montelukast in seasonal allergic rhinitis: effects on nasal congestion.
Anolik, R; Danzig, M; Prenner, B; Yao, R,
)
0.41
" Second-generation antihistamines have become increasingly popular because of their comparable efficacy and lower incidence of adverse effects relative to their first-generation counterparts, and the safety and efficacy of this drug class are established in the adult population."( Treatment of allergic rhinitis in infants and children: efficacy and safety of second-generation antihistamines and the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast.
Moeller, ML; Nahata, MC; Phan, H, 2009
)
0.35
" Adverse events (AEs) were reported throughout the studies; serious AEs were recorded for up to 30 days after treatment."( Safety and efficacy of desloratadine in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis or chronic urticaria: results of four postmarketing surveillance studies.
Bachert, C; Maurer, M, 2010
)
0.66
" Adverse events (AEs) were defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or laboratory data, including onset of new illness and exacerbation of preexisting conditions."( Safety of fixed-dose loratadine/montelukast in subjects with allergic rhinitis.
Danzig, MR; Lu, S; Prenner, BM,
)
0.45
" The treatment-related adverse effects, fatigue, tachycardia and palpitation, occurred less in the loratadine treatment group compared with the control group."( [Evaluation of efficacy and safety of loratadine in the treatment of childhood asthma].
Abduhaer, A; Maimaiti, G; Xu, PR, 2011
)
0.86
"Loratadine is safe and effective for the treatment of childhood asthma."( [Evaluation of efficacy and safety of loratadine in the treatment of childhood asthma].
Abduhaer, A; Maimaiti, G; Xu, PR, 2011
)
2.08
" Desloratadine is highly selective for histamine H₁-receptors, does not cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and has minimal adverse events (very low sedation rate), with a better safety and tolerability than first-generation antihistamines."( Safety evaluation of desloratadine in allergic rhinitis.
González-Núñez, V; Mullol, J; Valero, A, 2013
)
1.25
"We selected adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports on H1-antihistamines in children (0-16 years) up to June 2014 from VigiBase."( Safety profile of H1-antihistamines in pediatrics: an analysis based on data from VigiBase.
Biagi, C; Calamelli, E; Cipriani, F; Donati, M; Melis, M; Monaco, L; Motola, D; Ricci, G; Vaccheri, A, 2017
)
0.46
" Loratadine and desloratadine residues have been found at very low concentrations (ng/L) in the aquatic environment but their toxic effects are still not well known."( Ecotoxic effects of loratadine and its metabolic and light-induced derivatives.
Cermola, F; DellaGreca, M; Iesce, MR; Isidori, M; Lavorgna, M; Passananti, M; Piscitelli, C; Russo, C; Temussi, F, 2019
)
1.75
" However, desloratadine induces various degrees of sedation side effect in CSU patients, and no biomarkers currently exist for predicting the severity of such side effect."( Human H1 receptor (HRH1) gene polymorphism is associated with the severity of side effects after desloratadine treatment in Chinese patients with chronic spontaneous uticaria.
Chen, W; Chen, X; Li, J; Liu, Z; Peng, C; Su, J; Zhang, W; Zhu, W, 2020
)
1.14
"A small number of adverse events of seizure in patients using desloratadine (DL) have been reported."( Desloratadine Exposure and Incidence of Seizure: A Nordic Post-authorization Safety Study Using a New-User Cohort Study Design, 2001-2015.
Aas, E; Aasbjerg, K; Bolin, K; Born, AP; Brady, JE; Emneus, M; Ersbøll, AK; Gislason, G; Kjærulff, TM; Mines, D; Pukkala, E; Ramey, DR; Sengupta, K; Vestergaard, C, 2021
)
1.48

Pharmacokinetics

Loratadine (LOR) andpseudoephedrine sulfate (PES) tablet were tested for pharmacokinetic and bioavailability. CYP2D6 polymorphisms may contribute to the pharmacokinetics variability of lor atadine.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Loratadine was rapidly absorbed and the decline of plasma concentrations after attainment of the Cmax was biexponential in all subjects."( Pharmacokinetics of loratadine in patients with renal insufficiency.
Halstenson, CE; Hilbert, J; Matzke, GR; Opsahl, JA; Perentesis, G; Radwanski, E; Zampaglione, N, 1990
)
1.51
" The plasma L and DCL concentration-time data in the disposition phases were fitted to a biexponential equation for pharmacokinetic analysis."( Loratadine: multiple-dose pharmacokinetics.
Hilbert, J; Radwanski, E; Symchowicz, S; Zampaglione, N, 1987
)
1.72
" Concentrations in the disposition phase were fitted to a biexponential equation for pharmacokinetic analysis."( Pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of loratadine.
Hilbert, J; Luc, V; Perentesis, G; Radwanski, E; Symchowicz, S; Weglein, R; Zampaglione, N, 1987
)
0.53
" Concentrations of loratadine in the disposition phase were fitted to a biexponential equation and those of descarboethoxyloratadine to either a monoexponential or biexponential equation for pharmacokinetic analysis."( The pharmacokinetics of loratadine in normal geriatric volunteers.
Hilbert, J; Moritzen, V; Parks, A; Perentesis, G; Radwanski, E; Symchowicz, S; Zampaglione, N,
)
0.77
" The primary pharmacodynamic end point of the study was the difference between baseline and day 10 mean QTc intervals obtained from surface electrocardiograms."( Loratadine administered concomitantly with erythromycin: pharmacokinetic and electrocardiographic evaluations.
Affrime, MB; Brannan, MD; Cayen, MN; Lin, CC; Radwanski, E; Reidenberg, P; Shneyer, L, 1995
)
1.73
"The pharmacokinetic profiles of single and multiple doses of loratadine, descarboethoxyloratadine (DCL) (the major active metabolite of loratadine), and pseudoephedrine were determined in a randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study in 24 healthy men."( Pharmacokinetics of loratadine and pseudoephedrine following single and multiple doses of once- versus twice-daily combination tablet formulations in healthy adult males.
Affrime, MB; Batra, VK; Christopher, D; Kosoglou, T; Lim, JM; Radwanski, E,
)
0.7
" Pharmacokinetic investigations have shown the drug to be highly bound to blood proteins, mainly serum albumin, and to have a low brain uptake, explaining its lack of sedative effects."( Molecular properties and pharmacokinetic behavior of cetirizine, a zwitterionic H1-receptor antagonist.
Carrupt, PA; Jolliet, P; Morin, C; Morin, D; Pagliara, A; Rihoux, JP; Testa, B; Tillement, JP; Urien, S, 1998
)
0.3
" This paper reviews the pharmacokinetic properties of these second-generation agents and is intended to provide comparisons that help explain differences in dosing profiles and drug interactions for members of this class of drugs."( Pharmacokinetic overview of oral second-generation H1 antihistamines.
Estes, KS; González, MA, 1998
)
0.3
" A single-dose, open-label bioavailability study was performed to characterize the pharmacokinetic profiles of loratadine and its metabolite desloratadine."( The pharmacokinetics, electrocardiographic effects, and tolerability of loratadine syrup in children aged 2 to 5 years.
Affrime, MB; Banfield, C; Herron, JM; Lorber, R; Padhi, D; Salmun, LM, 2000
)
0.75
" It is concluded that, although there was a significant pharmacokinetic drug interaction between ketoconazole or cimetidine and loratadine, this effect was not accompanied by a change in the QTc interval in healthy adult volunteers."( Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic pharmacodynamics of loratadine with concomitant administration of ketoconazole or cimetidine.
Affrime, MB; Batra, VK; Cayen, MN; Kosoglou, T; Lim, JM; Salfi, M, 2000
)
0.74
"This study was undertaken to assess the effects of coadministration of desloratadine or fexofenadine with azithromycin on pharmacokinetic parameters, tolerability, and electrocardiographic (ECG) findings."( Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of desloratadine and fexofenadine when coadministered with azithromycin: a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Batra, V; Clement, R; Gupta, S; Kantesaria, B; Marino, M, 2001
)
0.81
"The results of the pharmacokinetic analysis revealed little change in mean maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values for desloratadine with concomitant administration of azithromycin: Cmax ratio, 115% (90% CI, 92-144); AUC, ratio 105% (90% CI, 82-134)."( Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of desloratadine and fexofenadine when coadministered with azithromycin: a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Batra, V; Clement, R; Gupta, S; Kantesaria, B; Marino, M, 2001
)
0.77
"To characterise the pharmacokinetic profile of desloratadine and its main metabolite, 3-hydroxy (3-OH) desloratadine, in a patient population representative of the population studied in the desloratadine clinical efficacy and safety studies, including the elderly."( A pharmacokinetic profile of desloratadine in healthy adults, including elderly.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Cohen, A; Gupta, S, 2002
)
0.85
"A multicentre, multidose, open-label pharmacokinetic trial."( A pharmacokinetic profile of desloratadine in healthy adults, including elderly.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Cohen, A; Gupta, S, 2002
)
0.6
" There were no clinically relevant differences in the calculated pharmacokinetic parameters of desloratadine when participants were stratified into 3 age groups (19 to 45, 46 to 64 and 65 to 70 years)."( A pharmacokinetic profile of desloratadine in healthy adults, including elderly.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Cohen, A; Gupta, S, 2002
)
0.82
" The 27-hour half-life of desloratadine permits once daily administration."( A pharmacokinetic profile of desloratadine in healthy adults, including elderly.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Cohen, A; Gupta, S, 2002
)
0.89
"This study was designed to characterise the single and multiple dose pharmacokinetic profile of desloratadine, a new antihistamine, and its main metabolite, 3-hydroxy (3-OH) desloratadine, in healthy volunteers differing in sex and race."( Effect of race and sex on single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of desloratadine.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Boutros, T; Cayen, M; Cohen, A; Gupta, S; Thonoor, M, 2002
)
0.76
"An open-label, parallel-group, single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic trial."( Effect of race and sex on single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of desloratadine.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Boutros, T; Cayen, M; Cohen, A; Gupta, S; Thonoor, M, 2002
)
0.55
" The apparent elimination half-life (T1/2) of LOR was (6+/-4) h, and that of DCL was (13."( Pharmacokinetics of loratadine and its active metabolite descarboethoxyloratadine in healthy Chinese subjects.
Chen, XY; Dong, YM; Zhang, YF; Zhong, DF, 2003
)
0.64
"This study determined the pharmacokinetic profile of single-dose loratadine-ambroxol hydrochloride combination therapy versus each component given separately."( Pharmacokinetic properties of single-dose loratadine and ambroxol alone and combined in tablet formulations in healthy men.
Alcántar, F; Herrera, J; Morales, JM; Rodríguez, JM; Rosete, R; Villacampa, J, 2003
)
0.82
"The pharmacokinetic profiles and relative bioavailability of desloratadine (CAS 100643-71-8, Denosin as test and another commercially available preparation as reference) tablets from two different pharmaceutical manufacturers were carried out."( Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of a generic desloratadine tablet formulation in healthy male volunteers.
Chiang, PS; Deng, ST; Hsiong, CH; Lo, CY; Yeh, GC, 2004
)
0.81
" The validated assay was applied to a pharmacokinetic study of loratadine in human plasma following the administration of a single loratadine tablet (40 mg)."( A validated HPLC-ESI-MS method for the determination of loratadine in human plasma and its application to pharmacokinetic studies.
Chen, J; Gao, KP; Gao, XL; Jiang, WM; Jiang, XG; Shi, ZQ; Zha, YZ, 2004
)
0.81
" Coadministration of desloratadine with a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6 did not result in clinically relevant changes in its pharmacokinetic parameters."( Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of desloratadine and fluoxetine in healthy volunteers.
Banfield, C; Flannery, B; Gupta, S; Herron, J; Kantesaria, B, 2004
)
0.9
"Ketoconazole altered the pharmacokinetic profiles of both ebastine and loratadine although the effect was greater for the former drug."( Co-administration of ketoconazole with H1-antagonists ebastine and loratadine in healthy subjects: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects.
Chaikin, P; Gillen, MS; Malik, M; Pentikis, H; Rhodes, GR; Roberts, DJ, 2005
)
0.8
" In view of the large interindividual variability in loratadine pharmacokinetics and the greater genetically determined variability of CYP2D6 activity than of CYP3A4 in vivo, we hypothesized that CYP2D6 polymorphisms may contribute to the pharmacokinetic variability of loratadine."( Effect of cyp2d6*10 allele on the pharmacokinetics of loratadine in chinese subjects.
Chow, MS; Shi, XJ; Tomlinson, B; Yin, OQ, 2005
)
0.83
"To support the pharmacokinetic and bioavailability study of an extended-release loratadine (LOR)/pseudoephedrine sulfate (PES) tablet, a high performance liquid chromatographic-electrospray ionisation-mass spectrometric method (LC-MS) was developed for the simultaneous determination of LOR and PES in human plasma."( Simultaneous determination of loratadine and pseudoephedrine sulfate in human plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry for pharmacokinetic studies.
Gu, Y; Huang, M; Li, H; Shao, F; Sun, J; Wang, G; Wang, W; Xie, H; Zhang, J; Zhang, Q; Zhao, S, 2005
)
0.84
" It is concluded that estimating in vivo receptor occupancy, which takes into account both the affinity of the drug for the receptor and its free plasma concentration, is a far better predictor for human pharmacodynamics and hence antihistamine potency, than considering in vitro affinity and plasmatic half-life only."( Histamine H1 receptor occupancy and pharmacodynamics of second generation H1-antihistamines.
Baltes, E; Benedetti, MS; Chatelain, P; Gillard, M, 2005
)
0.33
" Subjects were given desloratadine 5 mg once daily for 10 days and were assessed in several pharmacokinetic parameters."( Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of desloratadine in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment.
Gupta, SK; Kantesaria, B; Wang, Z, 2007
)
0.9
" The method was shown to be accurate, rapid and sufficiently sensitive to be successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic and bioequivalent study."( Simultaneous determination of desloratadine and its active metabolite 3-hydroxydesloratadine in human plasma by LC/MS/MS and its application to pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence.
Chen, WL; Chu, NN; Li, XN; Xu, HR, 2007
)
0.62
" However, the elimination half-life (t1/2) of the parent compound and its metabolite was significantly longer (p<0."( Circadian time-effect of orally administered loratadine on plasma pharmacokinetics in mice.
Ben-Attia, M; Boughattas, NA; Djebli, N; Dridi, D; Sani, M; Sauvage, FL, 2008
)
0.61
" Except for maximum observed concentration during a dosing interval (Cmax,ss) of 3-hydroxydesloratadine, on average, there were no statistically significant differences in mean plasma concentrations in any of the main pharmacokinetic parameters of rupatadine, desloratadine, and 3-hydroxydesloratadine when administered in combination with azithromycin or alone."( Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of rupatadine when coadministered with azithromycin at steady-state levels: a randomized, open-label, two-way, crossover, Phase I study.
Antonijoan, R; Barbanoj, M; Carbó, ML; Donado, E; Izquierdo, I; Merlos, M; Nadal, T; Peña, J; Solans, A, 2008
)
0.57
" The method has been successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study of rupatadine and its major metabolite after oral administration of 10, 20 and 40mg rupatadine tablets to healthy Chinese volunteers."( Simultaneous determination of rupatadine and its metabolite desloratadine in human plasma by a sensitive LC-MS/MS method: application to the pharmacokinetic study in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Fan, G; Hong, Z; Wei, H; Wen, J; Wu, Y, 2009
)
0.59
" The pharmacokinetic parameters ofloratadine were measured after an orally (4 mg/kg) and intravenously (1 mg/kg) administration of loratadine in the presence or absence of roxithromycin (2."( Effects of roxithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of loratadine after oral and intravenous administration of loratadine in rats.
Choi, JS; Kim, CS; Li, C; Park, YJ; Yang, JY,
)
0.66
"A retrospective analysis was conducted of prior noncompartmental analysis results from healthy white Jordanian male subjects who participated in 2 pharmacokinetic studies."( A retrospective, open-label analysis of the population pharmacokinetics of a single 10-mg dose of loratadine in healthy white Jordanian male volunteers.
Idkaidek, NM; Najib, NM; Salem, II, 2010
)
0.58
" The pharmacokinetic parameters of allindicated active components exhibited no detectable distinctions, except for the time to attaining maximum concentration ofparacetamol and the value of the maximum concentration of loratadine."( [Comparative pharmacokinetics of antigrippin-maximum administered in capsules and powder for preparing solutions].
Belolipetskaia, VG; Belolipetskiĭ, NA; Blagodatskikh, SV; Guranda, DF; Kibalchich, DA; Rudenko, LI; Zhabina, EA, 2011
)
0.55
" The method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study of RT and its two metabolite DT and 3-OH-DT in healthy volunteers following single (10, 20, 40 mg) and multiple (10 mg) oral doses of rupatadine fumarate tablets."( Development of a highly sensitive LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of rupatadine and its two active metabolites in human plasma: Application to a clinical pharmacokinetic study.
Ding, L; Gu, P; Li, Q; Liu, B; Pan, L; Sun, C; Wu, C; Zhang, J, 2015
)
0.42
" The pharmacokinetic profiles were analyzed using a non-compartmental method in the Phoenix WinNonlin program."( Prevalence of Desloratadine Slow-metabolizer Phenotype and Food-dependent Pharmacokinetics of Desloratadine in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.
He, L; Jiang, X; Li, T; Wang, L; Wang, T; Xie, H; Zhang, K, 2015
)
0.76
"A rapid, sensitive, and accurate bioanalytical method was established for the quantitation and pharmacokinetic investigation of loratadine (LTD) in rat plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) using loratadine-d5 as internal standard (ISTD)."( LC-ESI-MS/MS estimation of loratadine-loaded self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems in rat plasma: Pharmacokinetic evaluation and computer simulations by GastroPlus™.
Singh, SK; Verma, S, 2016
)
0.94
" Pharmacokinetic behavior of LTD formulations was investigated in healthy volunteers following administration of a single 10-mg dose."( Loratadine bioavailability via buccal transferosomal gel: formulation, statistical optimization, in vitro/in vivo characterization, and pharmacokinetics in human volunteers.
Abou-Taleb, HA; El Menshawe, SF; Elkarmalawy, MH; Elkomy, MH, 2017
)
1.9
"The accuracy of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model prediction in children, especially those younger than 2 years old, has not been systematically evaluated."( Predictive Performance of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling of Drugs Extensively Metabolized by Major Cytochrome P450s in Children.
Al-Huniti, N; Bui, KH; Cheung, SYA; Johnson, TN; Li, J; Xu, H; Zhou, D; Zhou, W, 2018
)
0.48
" The drug dissolution and the gastrointestinal tract pH conditions are likely to influence the in vivo pharmacokinetic behavior of LTD tablets."( Simultaneous Determination of Loratadine and Its Metabolite Desloratadine in Beagle Plasma by LC-MS/MS and Application for Pharmacokinetics Study of Loratadine Tablets and Omeprazole‑Induced Drug-Drug Interaction.
Li, X; Wang, W; Wang, Y; Wu, W; Xu, Q; Zhang, J; Zhang, T; Zhang, Y, 2021
)
0.91
" Pharmacokinetic results showed in the fasting state the three LTD tablets were equivalent in beagles in terms of effective components."( Simultaneous Determination of Loratadine and Its Metabolite Desloratadine in Beagle Plasma by LC-MS/MS and Application for Pharmacokinetics Study of Loratadine Tablets and Omeprazole‑Induced Drug-Drug Interaction.
Li, X; Wang, W; Wang, Y; Wu, W; Xu, Q; Zhang, J; Zhang, T; Zhang, Y, 2021
)
0.91

Compound-Compound Interactions

Montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine is well tolerated and provides clinical and quality-of-life benefits for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Except for maximum observed concentration during a dosing interval (Cmax,ss) of 3-hydroxydeslor atadine, on average there were no statistically significant differences in mean plasma concentrations.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"To determine whether Patanol in combination with the systemic antihistamine Claritin (loratadine, Schering, Kenilworth, NJ) reduces the ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis more effectively than Claritin alone."( The added benefit of local Patanol therapy when combined with systemic Claritin for the inhibition of ocular itching in the conjunctival antigen challenge model.
Abelson, MB; Lanier, RQ, 1999
)
0.53
" A substantial increase was observed in mean Cmax and AUC values for fexofenadine when administered with azithromycin: Cmax, ratio, 169% (90% CI, 120-237); AUC ratio, 167% (90% CI, 122-229)."( Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of desloratadine and fexofenadine when coadministered with azithromycin: a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Batra, V; Clement, R; Gupta, S; Kantesaria, B; Marino, M, 2001
)
0.58
"Montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine is well tolerated and provides clinical and quality-of-life benefits for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis."( Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.
Lu, S; Malice, MP; Nayak, AS; Philip, G; Reiss, TF, 2002
)
0.81
" Our study was done to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of desloratadine combined with dipyridamole, which is a platelet adhesion inhibitor in the treatment of CU."( Efficacy and safety of desloratadine combined with dipyridamole in the treatment of chronic urticaria.
Abdalla, AN; Khalaf, AT; Liu, XM; Sheng, WX; Tan, JQ, 2008
)
0.88
" Except for maximum observed concentration during a dosing interval (Cmax,ss) of 3-hydroxydesloratadine, on average, there were no statistically significant differences in mean plasma concentrations in any of the main pharmacokinetic parameters of rupatadine, desloratadine, and 3-hydroxydesloratadine when administered in combination with azithromycin or alone."( Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of rupatadine when coadministered with azithromycin at steady-state levels: a randomized, open-label, two-way, crossover, Phase I study.
Antonijoan, R; Barbanoj, M; Carbó, ML; Donado, E; Izquierdo, I; Merlos, M; Nadal, T; Peña, J; Solans, A, 2008
)
0.57
"Montelukast alone or in combination with antihistamines gave a gradual increase in nasal symptom improvement within 6 weeks of treatment in patients with persistent AR."( Use of montelukast alone or in combination with desloratadine or levocetirizine in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis.
Barylski, M; Ciebiada, M; Gorska-Ciebiada, M; Gorski, P; Kmiecik, T,
)
0.38
"The hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) influence the pharmacokinetics of several drug classes and are involved in many clinical drug-drug interactions."( Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
Artursson, P; Haglund, U; Karlgren, M; Kimoto, E; Lai, Y; Norinder, U; Vildhede, A; Wisniewski, JR, 2012
)
0.38
" This study assessed the effect of long-lasting treatment with montelukast alone or in combination with antihistamines on wheal and flare in skin pricks tests (SPT) in patients sensitized to perennial allergens."( Wheal and flare reactions in skin prick tests of patients treated with montelukast alone or in combination with antihistamines.
Barylski, M; Ciebiada, M; Ciebiada, MG, 2014
)
0.4
"Both levocetirizine and desloratadine in monotherapy, or in combination with montelukast, were effective in reducing wheal and flare in SPT."( Wheal and flare reactions in skin prick tests of patients treated with montelukast alone or in combination with antihistamines.
Barylski, M; Ciebiada, M; Ciebiada, MG, 2014
)
0.7
" In vitro assessment of the proarrhythmic potential of drugs is limited to one compound and thus neglects the potential of drug-drug interactions, including those involving active metabolites."( Drug interaction at hERG channel: In vitro assessment of the electrophysiological consequences of drug combinations and comparison against theoretical models.
Kulig, M; Lisowski, B; Polak, S; Wiśniowska, B, 2018
)
0.48
"Evaluation of HPLC-high-resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-HRMS) full scan with polarity switching for increasing throughput of human in vitro cocktail drug-drug interaction assay."( HPLC-high-resolution mass spectrometry with polarity switching for increasing throughput of human in vitro cocktail drug-drug interaction assay.
Comstock, K; Ghosal, A; Ramanathan, D; Ramanathan, L; Ramanathan, R; Shen, H, 2018
)
0.48
" Overall, LC-HRMS-based nontargeted full scan quantitation allowed to improve the throughput of the in vitro cocktail drug-drug interaction assay."( HPLC-high-resolution mass spectrometry with polarity switching for increasing throughput of human in vitro cocktail drug-drug interaction assay.
Comstock, K; Ghosal, A; Ramanathan, D; Ramanathan, L; Ramanathan, R; Shen, H, 2018
)
0.48
"To examine the clinical typing and individualized treatment approach for allergic rhinitis and to determine the optimal treatment method for this disease using various drug combination therapies."( Individualized treatment for allergic rhinitis based on key nasal clinical manifestations combined with histamine and leukotriene D4 levels.
Chen, F; Li, G; Shen, C; Wang, H; Wen, Z; Zhang, X,
)
0.13
"Clinical symptom evaluation combined with experimental detection of histamine and leukotriene levels can be an objective and accurate method to clinically classify the allergic rhinitis types."( Individualized treatment for allergic rhinitis based on key nasal clinical manifestations combined with histamine and leukotriene D4 levels.
Chen, F; Li, G; Shen, C; Wang, H; Wen, Z; Zhang, X,
)
0.13
"To analyze the efficacy and safety of Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets combined with desloratadine as well as desloratadine alone in the treatment of chronic urticaria by Meta-analysis,in order to provide evidence-based reference for clinical treatment."( [Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets combined with desloratadine in treatment of chronic urticarial].
Pang, GX; Qiu, XJ; Shi, YS; Wang, QM, 2019
)
0.96
"To investigate the effect of drug treatment combined with psychological intervention on mental disorders in patients with persistent moderate-severe allergic rhinitis."( Improvement in Psychological Condition of Patients With Persistent Moderate-Severe Allergic Rhinitis by Drug Therapy Combined With Psychological Intervention.
Di, LL; Kang, ZP; Liu, J; Peng, XB; Tan, Y; Wang, LX; Yang, ZC, 2021
)
0.62
"Drug therapy or drug therapy combined with psychological intervention can alleviate anxiety and depression of patients with persistent moderate-severe allergic rhinitis and improve their quality of life."( Improvement in Psychological Condition of Patients With Persistent Moderate-Severe Allergic Rhinitis by Drug Therapy Combined With Psychological Intervention.
Di, LL; Kang, ZP; Liu, J; Peng, XB; Tan, Y; Wang, LX; Yang, ZC, 2021
)
0.62
" The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficiency of immunotherapy with thioridazine and loratadine in combination with resiqumiod (R848), a small-molecule TLR7 agonist, in suppressing CRC growth in a mouse model."( Pre-activation with TLR7 in combination with thioridazine and loratadine promotes tumoricidal T-cell activity in colorectal cancer.
Chen, T; Lin, G; Lin, X; Wang, X; Zhang, J, 2020
)
1.01
"This experiment was performed to explore the effect of oral desloratadine citrate disodium combined with physiological seawater nasal irrigation in the treatment of intermittent allergic rhinitis and its effect on serum inflammatory factors and peripheral blood Th1 and Th2."( Effects of oral desloratadine citrate disodium combined with physiological seawater nasal irrigation on IgE levels, IL-4, IL-6, IL-13 and IFN-γ expression and treatment of intermittent allergic rhinitis.
Li, W; Zhang, Y, 2020
)
1.13
"We sought to evaluate the efficacy and clinical feasibility of desloratadine in combination with compound glycyrrhizin in the treatment of CU."( Efficiency and safety of desloratadine in combination with compound glycyrrhizin in the treatment of chronic urticaria: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Lai, Y; Li, M; Tang, Y; Wen, Y, 2021
)
1.15
" A comparative pharmacokinetics study of three LTD tablets with different dissolution rates was conducted in male beagles in fasting state and an omeprazole-induced drug-drug interaction (DDI) study was subsequently performed under pretreatment of omeprazole."( Simultaneous Determination of Loratadine and Its Metabolite Desloratadine in Beagle Plasma by LC-MS/MS and Application for Pharmacokinetics Study of Loratadine Tablets and Omeprazole‑Induced Drug-Drug Interaction.
Li, X; Wang, W; Wang, Y; Wu, W; Xu, Q; Zhang, J; Zhang, T; Zhang, Y, 2021
)
0.91
" Moreover, significant changes in LTD and DL pharmacokinetics parameters were observed under the effect of omeprazole-induced pH increase in gastrointestinal tract, suggesting that DDI effects are of concern for the curative effect of LTD when combined with omeprazole."( Simultaneous Determination of Loratadine and Its Metabolite Desloratadine in Beagle Plasma by LC-MS/MS and Application for Pharmacokinetics Study of Loratadine Tablets and Omeprazole‑Induced Drug-Drug Interaction.
Li, X; Wang, W; Wang, Y; Wu, W; Xu, Q; Zhang, J; Zhang, T; Zhang, Y, 2021
)
0.91
"To investigate the efficacy of desloratadine citrate combined with compound glycyrrhizin in the treatment of subacute eczema."( Desloratadine citrate combined with compound glycyrrhizin in the treatment of subacute eczema: A randomized trial.
Chen, C; Wang, G; Xu, X; Yang, J; Ye, A, 2022
)
1.62

Bioavailability

Coamorphous systems using citric acid as a small molecular excipient were studied for improving physical stability and bioavailability. Loratadine is a BCS class II drug with low water solubility and high permeability. The effect of a high-fat breakfast on the bioavailability of the components of an extended-release tablet was studied.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The effect of a high-fat breakfast on the bioavailability of the components of an extended-release tablet containing 10 mg loratadine in the immediate-release coating and 240 mg pseudoephedrine sulfate in the extended-release core was studied in 24 healthy male volunteers in a single-dose, two-way crossover study."( Influence of food on the oral bioavailability of loratadine and pseudoephedrine from extended-release tablets in healthy volunteers.
Affrime, MB; Cayen, MN; Kosoglou, T; Lin, CC; Mojaverian, P; Nezamis, J; Nomeir, AA; Rodwanski, E, 1996
)
0.76
" A single-dose, open-label bioavailability study was performed to characterize the pharmacokinetic profiles of loratadine and its metabolite desloratadine."( The pharmacokinetics, electrocardiographic effects, and tolerability of loratadine syrup in children aged 2 to 5 years.
Affrime, MB; Banfield, C; Herron, JM; Lorber, R; Padhi, D; Salmun, LM, 2000
)
0.75
" In clinical studies, oral desloratadine is rapidly absorbed and bioavailability is not affected by ingestion with food or grapefruit juice."( Pharmacology and clinical efficacy of desloratadine as an anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory drug.
Agrawal, DK, 2001
)
0.87
"Certain foods, such as grapefruit juice, are known to substantially alter the bioavailability of some drugs."( Grapefruit juice reduces the oral bioavailability of fexofenadine but not desloratadine.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Gupta, S; Lim, J; Marino, M, 2002
)
0.54
"To assess the effect of consumption of grapefruit juice on the oral bioavailability of two nonsedating antihistamines, fexofenadine and desloratadine."( Grapefruit juice reduces the oral bioavailability of fexofenadine but not desloratadine.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Gupta, S; Lim, J; Marino, M, 2002
)
0.75
" In contrast, the bioavailability of desloratadine was unaffected by grapefruit juice."( Grapefruit juice reduces the oral bioavailability of fexofenadine but not desloratadine.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Gupta, S; Lim, J; Marino, M, 2002
)
0.81
"The bioavailability of drugs that do not undergo significant intestinal or hepatic metabolism, such as fexofenadine, may be altered when administered with agents that influence drug transport mechanisms."( Grapefruit juice reduces the oral bioavailability of fexofenadine but not desloratadine.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Gupta, S; Lim, J; Marino, M, 2002
)
0.54
"To determine the effect of coadministration of food on the bioavailability of oral desloratadine."( Oral bioavailability of desloratadine is unaffected by food.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Glue, P; Gupta, S; Marbury, T; Padhi, D, 2002
)
0.83
"In this population of healthy mate volunteers, results showed the bioavailability of loratadine and ambroxol from the new formulation and did not show impairment of absorption when the drugs were formulated in a combination tablet."( Pharmacokinetic properties of single-dose loratadine and ambroxol alone and combined in tablet formulations in healthy men.
Alcántar, F; Herrera, J; Morales, JM; Rodríguez, JM; Rosete, R; Villacampa, J, 2003
)
0.81
" The proposed method enables the unambiguous identification and quantitation of loratadine for pharmacokinetic, bioavailability or bioequivalence studies."( Determination of loratadine in human plasma by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization ion-trap tandem mass spectrometry.
Al Tamimi, JI; Idrees, J; Salem, II, 2004
)
0.89
"The pharmacokinetic profiles and relative bioavailability of desloratadine (CAS 100643-71-8, Denosin as test and another commercially available preparation as reference) tablets from two different pharmaceutical manufacturers were carried out."( Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of a generic desloratadine tablet formulation in healthy male volunteers.
Chiang, PS; Deng, ST; Hsiong, CH; Lo, CY; Yeh, GC, 2004
)
0.81
" The absolute bioavailability is 50-65% for mizolastine; it is high for levocetirizine as the percentage of the drug eliminated unchanged in the 48 h urine is 77% of the oral dose; the estimation for fexofenadine is at least 33%; no estimation was found for desloratadine."( Comparison of pharmacokinetics and metabolism of desloratadine, fexofenadine, levocetirizine and mizolastine in humans.
Benedetti, MS; Diquet, B; Molimard, M, 2004
)
0.75
" The method has been used to analyze several hundred human plasma samples for bioavailability studies."( Rapid determination of loratadine in small volume plasma samples by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection.
Ahmadiani, A; Amini, H, 2004
)
0.63
"To support the pharmacokinetic and bioavailability study of an extended-release loratadine (LOR)/pseudoephedrine sulfate (PES) tablet, a high performance liquid chromatographic-electrospray ionisation-mass spectrometric method (LC-MS) was developed for the simultaneous determination of LOR and PES in human plasma."( Simultaneous determination of loratadine and pseudoephedrine sulfate in human plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry for pharmacokinetic studies.
Gu, Y; Huang, M; Li, H; Shao, F; Sun, J; Wang, G; Wang, W; Xie, H; Zhang, J; Zhang, Q; Zhao, S, 2005
)
0.84
" Although several generic formulations of loratadine are available in Mexico, based on a literature search, information concerning the bioavailability of each formulation in the Mexican population is not available."( Bioavailability of two oral formulations of loratadine 20 mg with concomitant ketoconazole: an open-label, randomized, two-period crossover comparison in healthy Mexican adult volunteers.
de Lago, A; Gómez Silva, M; Gonzàlez-de la Parra, M; Lujàn Rangel, R; Namur, S; Pineyro-Garza, E; Piñeyro-López, A; Reyes-Araiza, R; Torres-Alanís, O; Trejo, D; Wacksman, N, 2006
)
0.86
"The purpose of this study was to describe the effect of the concomitant intake of food on the pharmacokinetic profile and bioavailability of a single dose of rupatadine."( Influence of food on the oral bioavailability of rupatadine tablets in healthy volunteers: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study.
Carbó, ML; Izquierdo, I; Merlos, M; Nadal, T; Peña, J; Solans, A, 2007
)
0.34
" Age and sex have no apparent effect on the drug's metabolism and elimination, and food does not affect its bioavailability or absorption."( Desloratadine for chronic idiopathic urticaria: a review of clinical efficacy.
DuBuske, L, 2007
)
0.96
" No major cytochrome P450 inhibition has been reported with desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine, and the bioavailability of desloratadine is minimally affected by drugs interfering with transporter molecules."( Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine : a comparative review.
Devillier, P; Faisy, C; Roche, N, 2008
)
0.84
" Inclusion complexation with cyclodextrin derivatives can lead to improved aqueous solubility and bioavailability of pharmacons due to the formation of co-crystals through hydrogen-bonding between the components."( Water-soluble loratadine inclusion complex: analytical control of the preparation by microwave irradiation.
Aigner, Z; Ambrus, R; Berkesi, O; Nacsa, A; Szabó-Révész, P, 2008
)
0.71
" The 90% CIs were included in the interval 80% to 125% for desloratadine and 3-hydroxydesloratadine, whereas 90% CI for rupatadine was shifted to the right of the interval used for comparing bioavailability of the drugs."( Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of rupatadine when coadministered with azithromycin at steady-state levels: a randomized, open-label, two-way, crossover, Phase I study.
Antonijoan, R; Barbanoj, M; Carbó, ML; Donado, E; Izquierdo, I; Merlos, M; Nadal, T; Peña, J; Solans, A, 2008
)
0.59
" Consequently, the relative bioavailability (R."( Effects of roxithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of loratadine after oral and intravenous administration of loratadine in rats.
Choi, JS; Kim, CS; Li, C; Park, YJ; Yang, JY,
)
0.38
" The calculated primary and secondary pharmacokinetic parameters were V(d)/F, k(e), absorption rate constant, lag time, distribution rate constant, redistribution rate constant, T(max), and C(max)."( A retrospective, open-label analysis of the population pharmacokinetics of a single 10-mg dose of loratadine in healthy white Jordanian male volunteers.
Idkaidek, NM; Najib, NM; Salem, II, 2010
)
0.58
" Consequently, the absolute bioavailability of loratadine in the presence of silybinin (1."( Effects of silybinin, CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitor in vitro, on the bioavailability of loratadine in rats.
Choi, JS; Lee, MY; Li, C, 2010
)
0.84
" It is an ionizable drug, whose solubility depends on the gastrointestinal pH, and the bioavailability is therefore very variable."( Physico-chemical characterization and in vitro/in vivo evaluation of loratadine:dimethyl-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes.
Aigner, Z; Balogh, Á; Blazsó, G; Mándity, I; Martinek, T; Sipos, P; Szabados-Nacsa, A; Szabó-Révész, P, 2011
)
0.6
" The resulting very high variability in bioavailability and related inter- and intra-subject absorption variations present a major challenge that hinders the realization of an effective and uniform therapy."( Investigating the use of liquisolid compacts technique to minimize the influence of pH variations on loratadine release.
Awad, N; El-Hammadi, M, 2012
)
0.59
"Solid dispersion systems have been widely used to enhance dissolution rate and oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs."( Spray coating as a powerful technique in preparation of solid dispersions with enhanced desloratadine dissolution rate.
Djuriš, J; Grujić, B; Homšek, I; Ibrić, S; Kachrimanis, K; Kolašinac, N, 2013
)
0.61
"The absorption rate of montelukast was not altered when administered with desloratadine."( Does desloratadine alter the serum levels of montelukast when administered in a fixed-dose combination?
Cakli, H; Cingi, C; Erdogmus, N; Ertugay, CK; Gurbuz, MK; Ince, I; Karasulu, E; Kaya, E; Toros, SZ, 2013
)
1.05
" The in vivo assessment of the optimized buccoadhesive wafer exhibits marked increase in bioavailability justifying the administration of Loratadine through buccal route, bypassing hepatic first pass metabolism."( Comparative study on the predictability of statistical models (RSM and ANN) on the behavior of optimized buccoadhesive wafers containing Loratadine and their in vivo assessment.
Chakraborty, DD; Chakraborty, P; Ghosh, A; Parcha, V, 2016
)
0.84
" Furthermore, the oral bioavailability and the pharmacokinetic behaviour of loratadine formulations in vivo were studied after a single dose of 1 mg/kg loratadine in beagle dogs."( Dissolution evaluation in vitro and bioavailability in vivo of self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems for pH-sensitive drug loratadine.
Gao, L; Li, H; Quan, D; Tan, Y; Wang, T; Yang, L; Yang, X, 2015
)
0.85
"An early prediction of solubility in physiological media (PBS, SGF and SIF) is useful to predict qualitatively bioavailability and absorption of lead candidates."( Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
Bharate, SS; Vishwakarma, RA, 2015
)
0.42
" To conclude, the effectiveness of design yields a stable optimized SNEDDS with enhanced permeation potential, which is expected to improve oral bioavailability of loratadine."( Fabrication of lipidic nanocarriers of loratadine for facilitated intestinal permeation using multivariate design approach.
Singh, SK; Verma, PR; Verma, S, 2016
)
0.9
"Taken together, these results indicated that the incidence of the DSM phenotype in the Chinese population was low and that food intake could significantly decrease the absorption rate and extent of desloratadine."( Prevalence of Desloratadine Slow-metabolizer Phenotype and Food-dependent Pharmacokinetics of Desloratadine in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.
He, L; Jiang, X; Li, T; Wang, L; Wang, T; Xie, H; Zhang, K, 2015
)
0.94
" The validated method when successfully applied for quantification of LTD in rat plasma revealed enhanced bioavailability of orally administered LTD-loaded self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS) (Cmax, 466."( LC-ESI-MS/MS estimation of loratadine-loaded self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems in rat plasma: Pharmacokinetic evaluation and computer simulations by GastroPlus™.
Singh, SK; Verma, S, 2016
)
0.73
"Coamorphous systems using citric acid as a small molecular excipient were studied for improving physical stability and bioavailability of loratadine, a BCS class II drug with low water solubility and high permeability."( Coamorphous Loratadine-Citric Acid System with Enhanced Physical Stability and Bioavailability.
Chang, C; Chang, R; Fu, Q; Wang, J; Zeng, A; Zhang, J; Zhang, T; Zhao, Y, 2017
)
1.04
"Loratadine (LTD) is an antihistaminic drug that suffers limited solubility, poor oral bioavailability (owing to extensive first-pass metabolism), and highly variable oral absorption."( Loratadine bioavailability via buccal transferosomal gel: formulation, statistical optimization, in vitro/in vivo characterization, and pharmacokinetics in human volunteers.
Abou-Taleb, HA; El Menshawe, SF; Elkarmalawy, MH; Elkomy, MH, 2017
)
3.34
" Suspension intermediate and liposome intermediate were prepared, respectively, for the formulation of two kinds of fast dissolving oral films with the aim of studying the effect of taste masking technology on the bioavailability of oral films."( Effect of taste masking technology on fast dissolving oral film: dissolution rate and bioavailability.
Chen, Y; Dhinakar, A; Ge, L; Huang, K; Kang, Y; Lu, X; Raza, F; Wu, J; You, X; Zhang, Y; Zhu, Y, 2018
)
0.48
"The purpose of this study was to develop an innovative surfactant-free lipidbased formulation (LF) for improving oral bioavailability of loratadine based on using solid particles colloidal silicon dioxide (CSD) as emulsifier and solid carrier."( A Novel Surfactant-free Lipid-based Formulation for Improving Oral Bioavailability of Loratadine Using Colloidal Silicon Dioxide as Emulsifier and Solid Carrier.
Huang, R; Quan, D; Shen, L; Tan, Y; Wang, T, 2018
)
0.91
" In this present research, loratadine (LTD) nanosuspensions were successfully prepared by the effervescent method using Soluplus as stabilizer to improve the bioavailability of LTD in vivo."( A simple and low-energy method to prepare loratadine nanosuspensions for oral bioavailability improvement: preparation, characterization, and in vivo evaluation.
He, H; Jiang, S; Li, R; Lu, X; Peng, F; Qin, L; Yang, D; Zhang, F; Zhang, P, 2020
)
1.12
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" Combined with borderline bioavailability and not really known fraction of absorbed dose, desloratadine was found to be a good example for showing the innovative in vitro approaches necessary to unambiguously classify desloratadine according to Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) guideline."( Biopharmaceutical classification of desloratadine - not all drugs are classified the easy way.
Berginc, K; Legen, I; Sibinovska, N; Trontelj, J; Žakelj, S, 2020
)
1.05
" Here we aimed to develop a novel solid loratadine nanocrystal to increase the low and pH-dependent water solubility for bioavailability enhancement."( Preparation of loratadine nanocrystal tablets to improve the solubility and dissolution for enhanced oral bioavailability.
Aisha, M; Huang, F; Li, J; Sun, M; Wang, H; Wu, J; Zhou, Y, 2021
)
1.24
" Furthermore, the characterization and oral bioavailability of loratadine nanocrystal were studied."( Preparation of loratadine nanocrystal tablets to improve the solubility and dissolution for enhanced oral bioavailability.
Aisha, M; Huang, F; Li, J; Sun, M; Wang, H; Wu, J; Zhou, Y, 2021
)
1.21
"The nanocrystal tablets could significantly improve the oral bioavailability of loratadine, which would also be a promising approach to enhance the solubility of insoluble drugs."( Preparation of loratadine nanocrystal tablets to improve the solubility and dissolution for enhanced oral bioavailability.
Aisha, M; Huang, F; Li, J; Sun, M; Wang, H; Wu, J; Zhou, Y, 2021
)
1.2

Dosage Studied

Study found cetirizine and loratadine to have similar nasal efficacy at therapeutic dosage 4 h after intake. However, the addition of clarithromycin statistically significantly altered the steady-state maximum observed plasma concentration.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"In a three-way, double-blind, crossover study the onset of action and effects at the end of the dosing interval of 10 mg/day astemizole, 10 mg/day loratadine and 120 mg/day terfenadine forte given for 3 days to six atopic volunteers were assessed using the Vienna challenge chamber (VCC)."( Onset and duration of the effects of three antihistamines in current use--astemizole, loratadine and terfenadine forte--studied during prolonged, controlled allergen challenges in volunteers.
Berger, U; Horak, F; Jäger, S, 1992
)
0.71
" Recommended dosage of loratadine (CAS 79794-75-5) is 10 mg once daily, whereas terfenadine (CAS 50679-08-8) until recently has been recommended as 60 mg twice daily."( Comparison of loratadine and terfenadine in allergic seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis with emphasis on nasal stuffiness and peak flow.
Hindberg Rasmussen, W; Høi, L; Lorentzen, KA; Nüchel Petersen, L; Olsen, OT; Svendsen, UG, 1992
)
0.95
" At the highest dosage tested, loratadine was less effective than phenobarbital as an inducer of 2B1 and 2B2, although the induction of these proteins could be detected immunochemically even at the lowest dosage of loratadine tested."( Evaluation of loratadine as an inducer of liver microsomal cytochrome P450 in rats and mice.
Casciano, CN; Cayen, MN; Clement, RP; Parkinson, A, 1992
)
0.93
" Further, astemizole has the longest time to relief of symptoms in this class; histamine wheal inhibition is not apparent until the second day of 10 mg dosing and does not peak for 9 to 12 days."( Pharmacology of antihistamines.
Woodward, JK, 1990
)
0.28
" Neither dose of loratadine had any significant effect on the methacholine dose-response relationship."( Comparison of the effect of loratadine on the airway and skin responses to histamine, methacholine, and allergen in subjects with asthma.
Holgate, ST; Town, GI, 1990
)
0.91
" Once-daily dosing is recommended."( Loratadine: a nonsedating antihistamine with once-daily dosing.
Barenholtz, HA; McLeod, DC, 1989
)
1.72
" It is concluded that 10 mg loratadine, administered once daily, controls the symptoms of rhinitis more effectively than 120 mg terfenadine given once daily in the last few hours of the 24 h dosing period."( Comparative efficacy of once daily loratadine versus terfenadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.
Banov, CH,
)
0.7
"9, respectively, indicating that there is little accumulation of either L or DCL after a multiple (once-a-day) dosage regimen."( Loratadine: multiple-dose pharmacokinetics.
Hilbert, J; Radwanski, E; Symchowicz, S; Zampaglione, N, 1987
)
1.72
"0 hour after dosing and the milk Cmax was 29."( Excretion of loratadine in human breast milk.
Affrime, MB; Hilbert, J; Perentesis, G; Radwanski, E; Symchowicz, S; Zampaglione, N, 1988
)
0.64
" One hour prior to dosing and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 48 hours after dosing, histamine and saline were injected intradermally into opposite arms."( Effects of loratadine (SCH 29851) in suppression of histamine-induced skin wheals.
Dyer, JG; Gural, R; Kassem, N; Robillard, N; Roman, I, 1988
)
0.66
" Histamine tests were performed on 10 occasions up to +24 h after dosing using an intradermal injection of histamine 2 micrograms with concommittant contralateral injection of a saline control."( Comparative wheal and flare study of mizolastine vs terfenadine, cetirizine, loratadine and placebo in healthy volunteers.
Cabanis, MJ; Caplain, H; Chaufour, S; Rosenzweig, P; Thebault, JJ; Ulliac, N, 1995
)
0.52
" As expected, astemizole-D tended to have a longer duration of action, with symptom severity lower with this agent than with loratadine-D during the second challenge session despite the differences in dosing schedule."( Efficacy and tolerability of astemizole-D and Loratadine-D during prolonged, controlled allergen challenge in the Vienna Challenge Chamber.
Berger, U; Horak, F; Jäger, S; Toth, J, 1996
)
0.76
" There were no differences between loratadine and placebo after the initial dose or steady-state (day 5) dosing for any measure of cognitive or psychomotor test performance, mood, or sedation."( Initial and steady-state effects of diphenhydramine and loratadine on sedation, cognition, mood, and psychomotor performance.
Berman, B; Harris, AG; Kay, GG; Mockoviak, SH; Morris, CE; Reeves, D; Starbuck, V; Sukenik, E, 1997
)
0.82
" Both were dosed at 10 mg/day."( Loratadine treatment of rhinitis due to pollen allergy reduces epithelial ICAM-1 expression.
Canonica, GW; Ciprandi, G; Danzig, M; Passalacqua, G; Pronzato, C; Ricca, V, 1997
)
1.74
" However, the addition of clarithromycin statistically significantly altered the steady-state maximum observed plasma concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over a dosing interval for loratadine (+36 and +76%, respectively) and for descarboethoxyloratadine (DCL), the active metabolite of loratadine (+69 and +49%, respectively)."( Steady-state pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic pharmacodynamics of clarithromycin and loratadine after individual or concomitant administration.
Carr, RA; Craft, JC; Edmonds, A; Gustavson, LE; Harris, SI; Locke, CS; Palmer, R; Shi, H, 1998
)
0.71
" Their longer duration of action also enables a more patient-friendly dosing regimen which increases patient compliance."( Pharmacokinetic overview of oral second-generation H1 antihistamines.
Estes, KS; González, MA, 1998
)
0.3
"5 hours after dosing were latency of the P300 event-related potential in which increased latency reflects a decreased rate of cognitive processing, visual analogue scale for subjective somnolence, and histamine skin tests for measurement of peripheral H1-blockade."( Central nervous system effects of H1-receptor antagonists in the elderly.
Fraser, TG; Maher, J; Pillay, N; Simons, FE; Simons, KJ, 1999
)
0.3
" Somnolence scores were similar for both groups at baseline and at the time of dosing (8:00 AM)."( Loratadine versus cetirizine: assessment of somnolence and motivation during the workday.
Gates, D; Greiding, L; Heithoff, K; Ramon, F; Salmun, LM; Scharf, M, 2000
)
1.75
" For the quantitative assay for all of the investigated substances in the laboratory mixture or in respective pharmaceutical dosage forms the "zero-crossing" technique was applied."( Second-derivative spectrophotometric assay of pseudoephedrine, ibuprofen and loratadine in pharmaceuticals.
Ivanovic, D; Mandic, G; Markovic, S; Medenica, M, 2000
)
0.54
" QTc prolongation (mean value over the dosing interval) was the pharmacodynamic parameter measured."( Loratadine and terfenadine interaction with nefazodone: Both antihistamines are associated with QTc prolongation.
Abernethy, DR; Barbey, JT; Brown, KS; Feirrera, I; Ford, N; Franc, J; Salazar, DE, 2001
)
1.75
" The drug had no adverse cardiovascular effects in various animal models or when administered at 9 times the recommended adult dosage for 10 days in volunteers."( Desloratadine.
Jarvis, B; McClellan, K, 2001
)
0.93
" The suggested procedures could be used for determination of loratadine both in pure and dosage forms, as well as in the presence of its degradate."( Stability indicating methods for the determination of loratadine in the presence of its degradation product.
Badawey, AM; El Ragehy, NA; Khateeb, SZ, 2002
)
0.8
" The present study, performed using single-dose treatments, demonstrated that maximal protective effect by montelukast was obtained 12 h after dosing and that montelukast plus loratadine did not result in significant additive bronchoprotective effects on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction."( The combination of single-dose montelukast and loratadine on exercise-induced bronchospasm in children.
Boner, AL; De Gasperi, W; Loiacono, A; Micciolo, R; Peroni, DG; Piacentini, GL; Pietrobelli, A; Sabbion, A, 2002
)
0.76
" No dosage adjustment of desloratadine is required in the elderly."( A pharmacokinetic profile of desloratadine in healthy adults, including elderly.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Cohen, A; Gupta, S, 2002
)
0.89
" Comparison of the C(max) and AUC values following 14 days of treatment with desloratadine indicates that no dosage adjustment is needed on the basis of sex or race."( Effect of race and sex on single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of desloratadine.
Affrime, M; Banfield, C; Boutros, T; Cayen, M; Cohen, A; Gupta, S; Thonoor, M, 2002
)
0.77
" Before dosing and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 24 hours after the first antihistamine dose as well as at 168, 192, and 216 hours after the first dose (ie, 12, 36, and 60 hours after the seventh and last consecutive daily H(1)-antihistamine dose), we measured fexofenadine, loratadine, or chlorpheniramine concentrations in plasma and in skin tissue samples obtained through use of punch biopsies, along with suppression of histamine-induced skin wheals and flares."( Clinical pharmacology of H1-antihistamines in the skin.
Gu, X; Silver, NA; Simons, FE; Simons, KJ, 2002
)
0.49
" In conclusion, this study shows that, at the end of the conventional dosing interval, ebastine 10 mg and cetirizine 10 mg once daily in repeated doses suppressed the histamine wheal more effectively than did loratadine 10 mg once daily or fexofenadine 60 mg twice daily."( Inhibition of the histamine wheal by ebastine compared with cetirizine, fexofenadine and loratadine at steady state.
Boyce, M; Carey, W; Luria, X; Warrington, S, 2002
)
0.72
" Onset of flare suppression occurred 2 hours after dosing with fexofenadine and 4 hours after dosing with loratadine."( Relative potency of fexofenadine HCl 180 mg, loratadine 10 mg, and placebo using a skin test model of wheal-and-flare suppression.
Christian, CD; Crisalida, T; Economides, A; Georges, GC; Hale, M; Kaliner, MA; Liao, Y; Meeves, SG; White, MV; Woodworth, TH, 2003
)
0.79
" It has a rapid onset of effect, efficacy throughout a 24-hour dosage interval, and sustained efficacy in these allergic conditions, as demonstrated in placebo-controlled trials of up to 6 weeks' duration in adult and adolescent patients."( Desloratadine: an update of its efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.
Goa, KL; Keam, SJ; Murdoch, D, 2003
)
0.94
" Dams administered 24 mg/kg of loratadine exhibited a transient 45% decrement in maternal body weight gain at the initiation of dosing (gestation days 7-9)."( Effects of perinatal loratadine exposure on male rat reproductive organ development.
McIntyre, BS; Morrissey, RE; Treinen, KA; Vancutsem, PM,
)
0.74
" The two methods have been applied successfully for the determination of [I] in its combination with [II] Clarinase tablets and [I] alone in different pharmaceutical dosage forms."( Simultaneous determination of loratadine and pseudoephedrine sulfate in pharmaceutical formulation by RP-LC and derivative spectrophotometry.
el-Fatatry, HM; Hammad, S; Mabrouk, MM; Wahbi, AA, 2003
)
0.61
"To compare the activity of antihistamines by the index of area under dose-response curve (AUDRC) obtained from histamine-induced wheal and flare reactions."( [Comparative activity of antihistamines on area under dose-response curve from histamine-induced wheal and flare responses in human skin].
Wang, RQ; Zhang, HY, 2004
)
0.32
"7 mmol/L) were performed for each one before dosing and 2, 4, and 24 hours after dosing."( [Comparative activity of antihistamines on area under dose-response curve from histamine-induced wheal and flare responses in human skin].
Wang, RQ; Zhang, HY, 2004
)
0.32
"9 ln (mmol/L) x mm2 at each time (before dosing and 2, 4, 24 hours after dosing) respectively."( [Comparative activity of antihistamines on area under dose-response curve from histamine-induced wheal and flare responses in human skin].
Wang, RQ; Zhang, HY, 2004
)
0.32
" Because the sugar coating technologies are troublesome and rarely used nowadays, the aim of this study was to develop alternative oral dosage forms containing L (5 mg) and PES (120 mg)."( Development of modified-release dosage forms containing loratadine and pseudoephedrine sulfate.
Cal, K; Kupiec, K; Sznitowska, M, 2004
)
0.57
" Over 97% of GPs ranked development of paediatric formulations and clearer dosage information more highly than clinical trials as a means to reducing off-label prescribing."( Off-label prescribing to children: attitudes and experience of general practitioners.
Ekins-Daukes, S; Helms, PJ; McLay, JS; Taylor, MW, 2005
)
0.33
" The choice of the sublethal (TD(50) = 82 mg/kg body weight) and the lethal (LD(50) = 4 g/kg body weight) dosage was based on preliminary studies."( Circadian time-dependent differences in murine tolerance to the antihistaminic agent loratadine.
Aouam, K; Ben Attia, M; Boughattas, NA; Dridi, D; Reinberg, A, 2005
)
0.55
" First, we constructed a dose-response curve."( Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis causes hyperresponsiveness to histamine challenge in mice.
Kirtsreesakul, V; Klemens, JJ; Luxameechanporn, T; Naclerio, RM, 2005
)
0.33
"Desloratadine was determined in two dosage forms (tablets and syrup) with the use of the method of capillary isotachophoresis."( [Isotachophoretic determination of desloratadine in tablets and syrup].
Havránek, E; Kubacák, P; Mikus, P; Valásková, I, 2005
)
1.22
"05) inhibited by a dose-response of DL compared with positive controls, in both NM (10(-5) m: 125+/-36 pg/mL, 10(-6) m: 95+/-22 pg/mL vs."( Effect of desloratadine on epithelial cell granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor secretion and eosinophil survival.
Alobid, I; Bernal-Sprekelsen, M; Mullol, J; Picado, C; Pujols, L; Roca-Ferrer, J; Valero, A; Xaubet, A, 2006
)
0.7
"Twelve healthy male volunteers participated in a four-period cross-over trial evaluating the effect of dosage forms on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of loratadine."( The relative bioavailability of loratadine administered as a chewing gum formulation in healthy volunteers.
Bidstrup, TB; Brosen, K; Damkier, P; Nielsen, F; Noehr-Jensen, L; Pedersen, RS, 2006
)
0.81
" Its action is sustained over the 24-hour dosing interval."( Effect of desloratadine on the control of morning symptoms in patients with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis.
Schenkel, EJ,
)
0.5
" However, they might be useful for taste-masking in solid dosage forms."( Solid lipid microparticles containing loratadine prepared using a Micromixer.
Medlicott, N; Milak, S; Tucker, IG, 2006
)
0.6
"0 h after dosing in both age groups."( Pharmacokinetics of desloratadine in children between 2 and 11 years of age.
Banfield, C; Gupta, S; Kantesaria, B; Khalilieh, S, 2007
)
0.65
"Inter- and intra-individual variability of the loratadine (LOR) metabolism in Caucasian subjects was assessed during a bioequivalence study for two pharmaceutical formulations (solid oral dosage forms) containing 10 mg of the active substance."( Validated ion pair liquid chromatography/fluorescence detection method for assessing the variability of the loratadine metabolism occurring in bioequivalence studies.
David, V; Medvedovici, A; Sora, DI; Udrescu, S, 2007
)
0.81
" Other important prescribing considerations are that, unlike all first-generation and some second-generation antihistamines, desloratadine is nonsedating at its clinically approved dosage and does not impair psychomotor function."( Desloratadine for chronic idiopathic urticaria: a review of clinical efficacy.
DuBuske, L, 2007
)
1.17
" Drug dosing at 17 HALO resulted in highest loratadine and desloratadine total apparent clearance values: 61."( Circadian time-effect of orally administered loratadine on plasma pharmacokinetics in mice.
Ben-Attia, M; Boughattas, NA; Djebli, N; Dridi, D; Sani, M; Sauvage, FL, 2008
)
0.87
" The simulated response after repeated once-daily administrations of 10 mg rupatadine showed a significant and maintained antihistaminic effect over time, between two consecutive dosing intervals."( Antihistaminic effects of rupatadine and PKPD modelling.
Carbo, ML; Izquierdo, I; Merlos, M; Nadal, T; Peña, J; Solans, A,
)
0.13
" Except for maximum observed concentration during a dosing interval (Cmax,ss) of 3-hydroxydesloratadine, on average, there were no statistically significant differences in mean plasma concentrations in any of the main pharmacokinetic parameters of rupatadine, desloratadine, and 3-hydroxydesloratadine when administered in combination with azithromycin or alone."( Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of rupatadine when coadministered with azithromycin at steady-state levels: a randomized, open-label, two-way, crossover, Phase I study.
Antonijoan, R; Barbanoj, M; Carbó, ML; Donado, E; Izquierdo, I; Merlos, M; Nadal, T; Peña, J; Solans, A, 2008
)
0.57
"Performances on VigTrack and MAT from 1 to 6 hours after dosing were not significantly different between L/M and placebo groups; in contrast, diphenhydramine resulted in significant impairment of tracking for up to 5 hours (P< or =0."( Effects of loratadine/montelukast on vigilance and alertness task performance in a simulated cabin environment.
Simons, M; Valk, PJ, 2009
)
0.74
"Increased dosing of nonsedating antihistamines is recommended by the current European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology/Global Allergy and Asthma European Network/European Dermatology Forum guidelines on patients with acquired cold urticaria (ACU) who do not respond satisfactorily to the standard dose."( High-dose desloratadine decreases wheal volume and improves cold provocation thresholds compared with standard-dose treatment in patients with acquired cold urticaria: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study.
Degener, F; Martus, P; Maurer, M; Siebenhaar, F; Zuberbier, T, 2009
)
0.72
" This study supports current guidelines that increased desloratadine dosing might benefit patients with urticaria who do not respond to standard doses."( High-dose desloratadine decreases wheal volume and improves cold provocation thresholds compared with standard-dose treatment in patients with acquired cold urticaria: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study.
Degener, F; Martus, P; Maurer, M; Siebenhaar, F; Zuberbier, T, 2009
)
0.97
" Efficient removal of background ions permitted the detection of drug-related ions in in vivo samples (plasma, bile, urine and feces) obtained from rats orally dosed with (14)C-loratadine with minimal interference."( A retention-time-shift-tolerant background subtraction and noise reduction algorithm (BgS-NoRA) for extraction of drug metabolites in liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry data from biological matrices.
Alton, K; Chowdhury, S; Ding, W; Ghosal, A; Tong, W; Zhu, P, 2009
)
0.55
" Patients evaluated nasal congestion and other symptoms of AR and measured peak nasal inspiratory flow before dosing and at 20-minute intervals during the subsequent 8 hours of pollen exposure."( Efficacy of loratadine-montelukast on nasal congestion in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis in an environmental exposure unit.
Briscoe, MP; Danzig, M; Day, JH; Ratz, JD; Yao, R, 2009
)
0.73
" Mean reductions in nasal congestion scores were comparable between the once- and twice-daily dosing regimens of the combination drug."( Desloratadine and pseudoephedrine combination therapy as a comprehensive treatment for allergic rhinitis and nasal congestion.
Anolik, R, 2009
)
0.97
" The algorithm demonstrated excellent effectiveness in detecting drug-related ions in in vivo samples (plasma, bile, urine and feces) obtained from rats orally dosed with 14C-loratadine."( An accurate-mass-based spectral-averaging isotope-pattern-filtering algorithm for extraction of drug metabolites possessing a distinct isotope pattern from LC-MS data.
Alton, K; Chowdhury, S; Tong, W; Zhu, P, 2009
)
0.55
"hr/ml (157%), respectively, after dosing with 10 mg loratadine tablets for 10 days."( Metabolism of loratadine and further characterization of its in vitro metabolites.
Alton, KB; Alvarez, N; Chowdhury, SK; Ghosal, A; Gupta, S; Lu, X; Ramanathan, R; Su, AD; Yuan, Y; Zbaida, S, 2009
)
0.96
" This method was also suitable for the assay determination of desloratadine in pharmaceutical dosage forms."( A validated stability-indicating UPLC method for desloratadine and its impurities in pharmaceutical dosage forms.
Chakole, D; Malleswara Reddy, A; Mukkanti, K; Rao, DD; Sait, SS; Satyanarayana, NV, 2010
)
0.85
" Alternative dosage forms such as liquids or oral disintegrating tablets are available for most agents, allowing ease of administration to most young children and infants; however, limited data are available regarding use in infants for most agents, except desloratadine, cetirizine and montelukast."( Treatment of allergic rhinitis in infants and children: efficacy and safety of second-generation antihistamines and the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast.
Moeller, ML; Nahata, MC; Phan, H, 2009
)
0.53
"Increasing the dosage of levocetirizine and desloratadine up to 4-fold improves chronic urticaria symptoms without compromising safety in approximately three quarters of patients with difficult-to-treat chronic urticaria."( The effectiveness of levocetirizine and desloratadine in up to 4 times conventional doses in difficult-to-treat urticaria.
Church, DS; Church, MK; Dimitrov, V; Kraeva, S; Kralimarkova, T; Lazarova, C; Popov, TA; Popova, D; Staevska, M, 2010
)
0.88
" The antiinflammatory dose-response curve of loratadine was shifted to the left when studied in combination with montelukast (0."( Concomitant activity of histamine and cysteinyl leukotrienes on porcine nasal mucosal vessels and nasal inflammation in the rat.
Hunter, JC; Jia, Y; Jimenez, J; Lieber, G; McLeod, RL, 2010
)
0.62
" In vivo studies were conducted, in which FVB wild-type and FVB/Mrp2(-/-) mice were dosed with fosinopril and the known MRP2 substrate methotrexate, and tissues collected after 1 h."( Mrp2 is involved in the efflux and disposition of fosinopril.
Bain, LJ; Green, BR, 2013
)
0.39
" Because starch is a very common excipient used in solid dosage formulations, the results of this compatibility study should facilitate pharmaceutical development involving secondary amine APIs and starch."( A compatibility study of a secondary amine active pharmaceutical ingredient with starch: identification of a novel degradant formed between desloratadine and a starch impurity using LC-MS(n) and NMR spectroscopy.
Buevich, AV; Li, M; Rustum, AM; Wang, X; Yu, X, 2013
)
0.59
" In this work a solution is proposed for the specific case of validating analytical methods involved in the assessment of the content uniformity or uniformity of dosage units of a batch of pharmaceutical drug products as proposed in the European or US pharmacopoeias."( Methodology for the validation of analytical methods involved in uniformity of dosage units tests.
Boulanger, B; Hubert, P; Marini, RD; Rozet, E; Ziemons, E, 2013
)
0.39
" Patients could be categorized into four groups based on the results of ASST and SPT to HDM and patients with positive ASST and positive SPT to HDM had the highest disease activity scores, experienced higher frequencies of angioedema, diseases duration, and required higher dosage of loratadine every month, compared with other subgroups (P<0."( Evaluation of autologous serum skin test and skin prick test reactivity to house dust mite in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria.
Chen, W; Hao, F; Song, Z; Zhai, Z; Zhong, H; Zhou, Z, 2013
)
0.57
" A rapid, simple, selective and precise densitometric method was developed and validated for simultaneous estimation of six synthetic binary mixtures and their pharmaceutical dosage forms."( Thin layer chromatography-densitometric determination of some non-sedating antihistamines in combination with pseudoephedrine or acetaminophen in synthetic mixtures and in pharmaceutical formulations.
Atia, NN; El-Gizawy, SM; El-Kommos, ME; Hosny, NM, 2014
)
0.4
"Patients, especially children, are the most difficult to treat in all groups of population mainly because they can not swallow the solid dosage form."( Optimization and evaluation of desloratadine oral strip: an innovation in paediatric medication.
Kaur, M; Singh, H; Verma, H, 2013
)
0.67
" The methods were successfully applied for the determination of the studied drugs in pharmaceutical dosage forms with excellent recovery."( Utility of 4-chloro-7-nitrobenzofurazan (NBD-CI) for the Spectrophotometric and spectrofluorometric determination of several antihistamine and antihypertensive drugs.
Abd, el-HS; Colyer, CL; Hassan, WS; Shalaby, A,
)
0.13
"Limited information is available regarding sedation and motor function following repeat dosing of antihistamines."( Drowsiness and motor responses to consecutive daily doses of promethazine and loratadine.
Anoopkumar-Dukie, S; Baumann-Birkbeck, L; Grant, GD; Kavanagh, JJ, 2014
)
0.63
" A reduced tremor response was also observed following consecutive daily dosing of promethazine, in contrast to loratadine which caused an increase in tremor amplitude with the consecutive daily dose."( Drowsiness and motor responses to consecutive daily doses of promethazine and loratadine.
Anoopkumar-Dukie, S; Baumann-Birkbeck, L; Grant, GD; Kavanagh, JJ, 2014
)
0.84
"Sufferers of allergic rhinitis often require antihistamine dosing regimens that continue over multiple days."( Drowsiness and motor responses to consecutive daily doses of promethazine and loratadine.
Anoopkumar-Dukie, S; Baumann-Birkbeck, L; Grant, GD; Kavanagh, JJ, 2014
)
0.63
"Buccoadhesive wafer dosage form containing Loratadine is formulated utilizing Formulation by Design (FbD) approach incorporating sodium alginate and lactose monohydrate as independent variable employing solvent casting method."( Comparative study on the predictability of statistical models (RSM and ANN) on the behavior of optimized buccoadhesive wafers containing Loratadine and their in vivo assessment.
Chakraborty, DD; Chakraborty, P; Ghosh, A; Parcha, V, 2016
)
0.9
" Compared to the dexchlorpheniramine plus betamethasone combination, it showed similar clinical action, but with a lower incidence of adverse events and higher dosing convenience."( Association between desloratadine and prednisolone in the treatment of children with acute symptoms of allergic rhinitis: a double-blind, randomized and controlled clinical trial.
Amazonas, RB; Ensina, LF; Miranda, C; Sano, F; Silva, JMD; Solé, D; Wandalsen, GF,
)
0.44
" Once the disease is completely controlled, however, maintenance of the same dosage for at least 8 weeks before dose reduction is suggested in order to avoid recurrence of the symptoms."( The treatment outcomes and dose de-escalation of desloratadine up-dosing in chronic spontaneous urticaria.
Chaowattanapanit, S; Choonhakarn, C; Julanon, N, 2018
)
0.73
" Furthermore, it serves as a method of pre-dispersion preparation for various dosage form developments."( Design and characterization of loratadine nanosuspension prepared by ultrasonic-assisted precipitation.
Alshweiat, A; Ambrus, R; Csóka, I; Katona, G, 2018
)
0.77
" In cases of failure, treatment was switched to omalizumab at doses of < 300 mg/month with incremental dosage increases as necessary (monthly dose range, 150-600 mg/month)."( Real-life experience in the treatment of solar urticaria: retrospective cohort study.
Enk, CD; Hodak, E; Lapidoth, M; Levi, A; Mazor, S; Snast, I; Uvaidov, V, 2019
)
0.51
" Thus, Loratadine nanofibers can be considered as an alternative dosage form with improved physicochemical properties."( 3D-printed electrospinning setup for the preparation of loratadine nanofibers with enhanced physicochemical properties.
Alshweiat, A; Ambrus, R; Csóka, I; Esmail, A; Ovari, G; Radacsi, N, 2019
)
1.22
"A stability-indicating method (SIM) stipulates the testing of the drug product and drug substances under the stressed conditions that will imply a clear notion about the stress conditions that would affect the drug in its finished dosage form."( Surveillance of Stability Under Different Stress Conditions in Desloratadine and Study of Degradation Kinetics.
Pandey, R; Pandey, S; Shukla, SS, 2022
)
0.96
"The influence of binder concentration, disintegrating agent dosage and ratio mannitol: cellulose on formability and disintegration time was investigated."( Preparation of Loratadine Orally Disintegrating Tablets by Semi-solid Extrusion 3D Printing.
Chen, L; Xie, J; Xu, F; Yi, S, 2023
)
1.26
" The enhanced fluorescence was employed as a basis for the development of a novel microwell spectrofluorimetric assay (MW-SFA) for the determination of LOR in its pharmaceutical dosage forms and urine samples."( Dual fluorescence enhancement of loratidine by photoinduced electron transfer blocking and micellization: Application to the development of novel highly sensitive microwell spectrofluorimetric assay for analysis of dosage forms and urine samples.
Alzoman, NZ; Darwish, IA, 2024
)
1.44
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Occurs in Manufacturing (1 Items)

ItemProcessFrequency
en:open-beauty-factscore-ingredient1

Roles (4)

RoleDescription
geroprotectorAny compound that supports healthy aging, slows the biological aging process, or extends lifespan.
H1-receptor antagonistH1-receptor antagonists are the drugs that selectively bind to but do not activate histamine H1 receptors, thereby blocking the actions of endogenous histamine.
anti-allergic agentA drug used to treat allergic reactions.
cholinergic antagonistAny drug that binds to but does not activate cholinergic receptors, thereby blocking the actions of acetylcholine or cholinergic agonists.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (5)

ClassDescription
benzocycloheptapyridine
ethyl esterAny carboxylic ester resulting from the formal condensation of the carboxy group of a carboxylic acid with ethanol.
N-acylpiperidine
tertiary carboxamideA carboxamide resulting from the formal condensation of a carboxylic acid with a secondary amine; formula RC(=O)NHR(1)R(2).
organochlorine compoundAn organochlorine compound is a compound containing at least one carbon-chlorine bond.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (1)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
Loratadine H1-Antihistamine Action87

Protein Targets (132)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, Beta-lactamaseEscherichia coli K-12Potency18.86770.044717.8581100.0000AID485341
Chain A, CruzipainTrypanosoma cruziPotency32.79920.002014.677939.8107AID1476
acetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)Potency50.24990.002541.796015,848.9004AID1347395
glp-1 receptor, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency14.12540.01846.806014.1254AID624417
thioredoxin reductaseRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency0.44670.100020.879379.4328AID588453
15-lipoxygenase, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency25.11890.012610.691788.5700AID887
hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha subunitHomo sapiens (human)Potency35.07753.189029.884159.4836AID1224846; AID1224894
RAR-related orphan receptor gammaMus musculus (house mouse)Potency12.59610.006038.004119,952.5996AID1159521; AID1159523
SMAD family member 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency32.23080.173734.304761.8120AID1346859
ATAD5 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency22.13370.004110.890331.5287AID493106; AID493107
Fumarate hydrataseHomo sapiens (human)Potency37.22120.00308.794948.0869AID1347053
USP1 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency56.23410.031637.5844354.8130AID504865
GLS proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency31.62280.35487.935539.8107AID624170
SMAD family member 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency32.23080.173734.304761.8120AID1346859
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency14.43140.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
GLI family zinc finger 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency31.24400.000714.592883.7951AID1259368; AID1259369; AID1259392
Microtubule-associated protein tauHomo sapiens (human)Potency22.27470.180013.557439.8107AID1460
ThrombopoietinHomo sapiens (human)Potency19.95260.02517.304831.6228AID917; AID918
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency33.47190.000221.22318,912.5098AID1259243; AID1259247; AID743035; AID743036; AID743042; AID743053; AID743054; AID743063
hypoxia-inducible factor 1, alpha subunit (basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor)Homo sapiens (human)Potency15.84890.00137.762544.6684AID914; AID915
thyroid stimulating hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency29.88160.001318.074339.8107AID926; AID938
estrogen receptor 2 (ER beta)Homo sapiens (human)Potency31.94270.000657.913322,387.1992AID1259377; AID1259378
nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group I, member 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency27.17400.001022.650876.6163AID1224839
progesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency19.68670.000417.946075.1148AID1346784; AID1346795
isocitrate dehydrogenase 1, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency50.11876.309627.099079.4328AID602179
cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A polypeptide 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency2.45450.01237.983543.2770AID1645841
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency25.63420.001310.157742.8575AID1259252; AID1259253; AID1259255; AID1259256
nonstructural protein 1Influenza A virus (A/WSN/1933(H1N1))Potency19.09190.28189.721235.4813AID2326
glucocorticoid receptor [Homo sapiens]Homo sapiens (human)Potency49.88610.000214.376460.0339AID720691; AID720692; AID720719
retinoic acid nuclear receptor alpha variant 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency55.37330.003041.611522,387.1992AID1159552; AID1159553; AID1159555
retinoid X nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency15.44240.000817.505159.3239AID1159527; AID1159531
estrogen-related nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency26.66860.001530.607315,848.9004AID1224819; AID1224820; AID1224841; AID1224842; AID1224848; AID1224849; AID1259401; AID1259403
farnesoid X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency20.88110.375827.485161.6524AID743217; AID743220
pregnane X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency7.18920.005428.02631,258.9301AID1346982
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency40.33520.000229.305416,493.5996AID1259244; AID1259248; AID743069; AID743075; AID743078; AID743079; AID743080; AID743091
GVesicular stomatitis virusPotency0.10960.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
cytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)Potency6.16550.00108.379861.1304AID1645840
polyproteinZika virusPotency37.22120.00308.794948.0869AID1347053
bromodomain adjacent to zinc finger domain 2BHomo sapiens (human)Potency79.43280.707936.904389.1251AID504333
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor deltaHomo sapiens (human)Potency58.63660.001024.504861.6448AID743212; AID743215; AID743227
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)Potency30.78360.001019.414170.9645AID743094; AID743191
vitamin D (1,25- dihydroxyvitamin D3) receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency42.52380.023723.228263.5986AID743223
arylsulfatase AHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.21331.069113.955137.9330AID720538
alpha-galactosidaseHomo sapiens (human)Potency50.11874.466818.391635.4813AID1467
IDH1Homo sapiens (human)Potency29.09290.005210.865235.4813AID686970
euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency45.85770.035520.977089.1251AID504332
cytochrome P450, family 19, subfamily A, polypeptide 1, isoform CRA_aHomo sapiens (human)Potency68.58960.001723.839378.1014AID743083
thyroid stimulating hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency64.75280.001628.015177.1139AID1224895
activating transcription factor 6Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.43640.143427.612159.8106AID1159516
nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells 1 (p105), isoform CRA_aHomo sapiens (human)Potency32.948219.739145.978464.9432AID1159509
v-jun sarcoma virus 17 oncogene homolog (avian)Homo sapiens (human)Potency9.93110.057821.109761.2679AID1159526
Histone H2A.xCricetulus griseus (Chinese hamster)Potency87.46770.039147.5451146.8240AID1224845
Bloom syndrome protein isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency28.18380.540617.639296.1227AID2364; AID2528
cytochrome P450 2D6 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency31.62280.00207.533739.8107AID891
NPC intracellular cholesterol transporter 1 precursorHomo sapiens (human)Potency58.04790.01262.451825.0177AID485313
peripheral myelin protein 22 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency42.561523.934123.934123.9341AID1967
cellular tumor antigen p53 isoform aHomo sapiens (human)Potency28.37090.316212.443531.6228AID902; AID924
cytochrome P450 2C19 precursorHomo sapiens (human)Potency6.49370.00255.840031.6228AID899
cytochrome P450 2C9 precursorHomo sapiens (human)Potency7.94430.00636.904339.8107AID883
vitamin D3 receptor isoform VDRAHomo sapiens (human)Potency44.66840.354828.065989.1251AID504847
chromobox protein homolog 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency50.11870.006026.168889.1251AID488953
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2 isoform dHomo sapiens (human)Potency26.65140.01789.637444.6684AID588834
thyroid hormone receptor beta isoform 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency12.70060.000323.4451159.6830AID743065; AID743067
heat shock protein beta-1Homo sapiens (human)Potency39.27740.042027.378961.6448AID743210; AID743228
mitogen-activated protein kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency19.95260.039816.784239.8107AID995
ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 2 isoform aHomo sapiens (human)Potency12.58930.65619.452025.1189AID927
ras-related protein Rab-9AHomo sapiens (human)Potency100.00000.00022.621531.4954AID485297
serine/threonine-protein kinase mTOR isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency23.28090.00378.618923.2809AID2668
nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency30.80920.000627.21521,122.0200AID743202; AID743219
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase NIMA-interacting 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency100.00000.425612.059128.1838AID504891
nuclear receptor ROR-gamma isoform 1Mus musculus (house mouse)Potency35.48130.00798.23321,122.0200AID2551
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency20.57870.004611.374133.4983AID463097; AID504364; AID624296; AID624297
peripheral myelin protein 22Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency40.53340.005612.367736.1254AID624032
survival motor neuron protein isoform dHomo sapiens (human)Potency21.42150.125912.234435.4813AID1458
cytochrome P450 3A4 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency6.30960.031610.279239.8107AID884; AID885
M-phase phosphoprotein 8Homo sapiens (human)Potency35.48130.177824.735279.4328AID488949
muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.60580.00106.000935.4813AID943; AID944
lamin isoform A-delta10Homo sapiens (human)Potency20.26980.891312.067628.1838AID1459; AID1487
neuropeptide S receptor isoform AHomo sapiens (human)Potency8.17120.015812.3113615.5000AID1461
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit piRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
Polyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)Potency12.58930.316212.765731.6228AID881
Voltage-dependent calcium channel gamma-2 subunitMus musculus (house mouse)Potency43.86690.001557.789015,848.9004AID1259244
Interferon betaHomo sapiens (human)Potency16.70180.00339.158239.8107AID1347407; AID1645842
HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.10960.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
Cellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)Potency43.63950.002319.595674.0614AID651631; AID720552
Integrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)Potency31.62280.316211.415731.6228AID924
Integrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)Potency31.62280.316211.415731.6228AID924
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit deltaRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
Glutamate receptor 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency43.86690.001551.739315,848.9004AID1259244
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
Histamine H2 receptorCavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)Potency9.80230.00638.235039.8107AID881; AID883
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
Guanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)Potency39.81071.995325.532750.1187AID624288
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
Disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)Potency12.58931.584913.004325.1189AID927
Inositol monophosphatase 1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency0.44671.000010.475628.1838AID1457
GABA theta subunitRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
Inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.10960.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)Potency28.15380.011917.942071.5630AID651632
Ataxin-2Homo sapiens (human)Potency28.15380.011912.222168.7989AID651632
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit epsilonRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency6.30961.000012.224831.6228AID885
cytochrome P450 2C9, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.10960.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)11.40000.00032.63119.0000AID1207748
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)12.00000.11007.190310.0000AID1473738
ATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)11.40000.00022.318510.0000AID679465
Angiotensin-converting enzymeOryctolagus cuniculus (rabbit)IC50 (µMol)39.08660.00001.612910.0000AID625171
Angiotensin-converting enzymeOryctolagus cuniculus (rabbit)Ki32.02280.00042.03378.6606AID625171
Platelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)135.00000.00030.63183.7000AID254775
Cytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.01600.00002.398310.0000AID625247
Histamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.23000.00000.44365.1768AID254701; AID625269
Histamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.19550.00000.511010.0000AID1169511; AID238789; AID238825; AID625269
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.24500.00011.18738.9125AID625217
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.15600.00030.769310.0000AID625217
Voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)11.40000.00032.59559.0000AID1207748
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)5.73090.00091.901410.0000AID161281; AID243151; AID408340; AID420668; AID576612; AID625171; AID82355
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)Ki32.02280.00211.840710.0000AID625171
Voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)11.40000.00032.63119.0000AID1207748
Voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)11.40000.00032.25459.6000AID1207748
Nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 3 Bos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)39.08660.10482.83988.3173AID625171
Nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 3 Bos taurus (cattle)Ki32.02280.08582.95428.6606AID625171
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
Bile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)3.07000.01834.560310.0000AID755454
Sodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)4.00004.00004.00004.0000AID1169507
Histamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki10.00000.00060.478710.0000AID1798265
Potassium channel subfamily K member 9Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)63.40000.07000.19400.3180AID1525558
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)8.90000.00203.519610.0000AID1215086; AID1215087; AID1215094; AID755445
Histamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)Kd0.19000.00010.40215.4000AID1668948
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (533)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
lipid metabolic processPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid metabolic processPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of macrophage derived foam cell differentiationPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid metabolic processPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell migrationPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
prostate gland developmentPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of epithelial cell differentiationPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of chemokine productionPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor signaling pathwayPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of keratinocyte differentiationPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell cyclePolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of growthPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
hepoxilin biosynthetic processPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
endocannabinoid signaling pathwayPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
cannabinoid biosynthetic processPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
lipoxin A4 biosynthetic processPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
linoleic acid metabolic processPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
lipid oxidationPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
lipoxygenase pathwayPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
visual perceptionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
detection of light stimulus involved in visual perceptionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion import across plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular receptor signaling pathwayNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell differentiationNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of autophagyInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylation of STAT proteinInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interferon-betaInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell proliferationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of viral genome replicationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of MHC class I biosynthetic processInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of Lewy body formationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T-helper 2 cell cytokine productionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
humoral immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell mediated cytotoxicityHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen via MHC class I via ER pathway, TAP-independentHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of T cell anergyHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
defense responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
detection of bacteriumHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of interleukin-12 productionHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of interleukin-6 productionHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protection from natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicityHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of dendritic cell differentiationHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen via MHC class IbHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ER overload responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
somitogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferation involved in immune responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
B cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleotide-excision repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein import into nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrestCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
Ras protein signal transductionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
gastrulationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein localizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA replicationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
determination of adult lifespanCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
rRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to salt stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to X-rayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
viral processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic G1 DNA damage checkpoint signalingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of telomere maintenance via telomeraseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of tissue remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UVCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial DNA repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription initiation-coupled chromatin remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to antibioticCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
circadian behaviorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
bone marrow developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic organ developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein stabilizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of helicase activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein tetramerizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome organizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
type II interferon-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac septum morphogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of programmed necrotic cell deathCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
necroptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ionizing radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-CCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to actinomycin DCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replicative senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative stress-induced premature senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of execution phase of apoptosisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability involved in apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G1 to G0 transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA processingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of pentose-phosphate shuntCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of fibroblast apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of low-density lipoprotein receptor activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein phosphorylationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of endothelial cell proliferationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell-matrix adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell-substrate junction assemblyIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell-matrix adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
integrin-mediated signaling pathwayIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
embryo implantationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
blood coagulationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of endothelial cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of macrophage derived foam cell differentiationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fibroblast migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of lipid storageIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
smooth muscle cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet activationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling pathwayIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell-substrate adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
activation of protein kinase activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of lipid transportIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein localizationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of actin cytoskeleton organizationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell adhesion mediated by integrinIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell adhesion mediated by integrinIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of osteoblast proliferationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
heterotypic cell-cell adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
substrate adhesion-dependent cell spreadingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
tube developmentIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
wound healing, spreading of epidermal cellsIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to platelet-derived growth factor stimulusIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
apolipoprotein A-I-mediated signaling pathwayIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
wound healingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic cell clearanceIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of bone resorptionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of angiogenesisIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bone resorptionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
symbiont entry into host cellIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet-derived growth factor receptor signaling pathwayIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fibroblast proliferationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
mesodermal cell differentiationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of lipoprotein metabolic processIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative chemotaxisIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosolIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of serotonin uptakeIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
angiogenesis involved in wound healingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet aggregationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to mechanical stimulusIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of glomerular mesangial cell proliferationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
blood coagulation, fibrin clot formationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
maintenance of postsynaptic specialization structureIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic neurotransmitter receptor internalizationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic neurotransmitter receptor diffusion trappingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of substrate adhesion-dependent cell spreadingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of adenylate cyclase-inhibiting opioid receptor signaling pathwayIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of trophoblast cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of extracellular matrix organizationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to insulin-like growth factor stimulusIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of endothelial cell apoptotic processIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
G2/M transition of mitotic cell cycleATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phospholipid translocationATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
terpenoid transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of response to osmotic stressATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ceramide translocationATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of anion channel activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
carboxylic acid transmembrane transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic detoxification by transmembrane export across the plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of chloride transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of leukocyte migrationIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
cell-matrix adhesionIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
integrin-mediated signaling pathwayIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
angiogenesisIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
cell-cell adhesionIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
cell adhesion mediated by integrinIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular extravasationPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chemotaxisPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responsePlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
immune responsePlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
parturitionPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to symbiotic bacteriumPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
lipopolysaccharide-mediated signaling pathwayPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-6 productionPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of tumor necrosis factor productionPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
inositol trisphosphate biosynthetic processPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled purinergic nucleotide receptor signaling pathwayPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neutrophil degranulationPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcytosisPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of translationPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of blood pressurePlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferationPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of inositol phosphate biosynthetic processPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gravityPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cAMPPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to fatty acidPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to dexamethasonePlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of leukocyte tethering or rollingPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcytosisPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of maternal process involved in parturitionPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gastro-intestinal system smooth muscle contractionPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to 2-O-acetyl-1-O-hexadecyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholinePlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
monoterpenoid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
epoxygenase P450 pathwayCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
omega-hydroxylase P450 pathwayCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
memoryHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
visual learningHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of vascular permeabilityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vasoconstrictionHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of synaptic plasticityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to histamineHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neural crest cell migration5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytokine production5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of endothelial cell proliferation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor internalization5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
heart morphogenesis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle hypertrophy5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular calcium ion homeostasis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
activation of phospholipase C activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulus5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol biosynthetic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
neural crest cell differentiation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
intestine smooth muscle contraction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
phosphorylation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
calcium-mediated signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP-mediated signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
vasoconstriction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of canonical NF-kappaB signal transduction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAP kinase activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transduction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic morphogenesis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of behavior5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of nitric-oxide synthase activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosol5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell division5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
ERK1 and ERK2 cascade5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to temperature stimulus5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messenger5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmission5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of inflammatory response to antigenic stimulusGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
renal water homeostasisGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of insulin secretionGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucagon stimulusGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathwayDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
neutrophil mediated immunityDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
germinal center formationDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of leukocyte chemotaxisDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
proteolysisDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
membrane protein ectodomain proteolysisDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
cell adhesionDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
Notch receptor processingDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferationDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell chemotaxisDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
protein processingDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
signal releaseDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
B cell differentiationDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell growthDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell migrationDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of chemokine productionDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of tumor necrosis factor productionDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mast cell apoptotic processDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
cell adhesion mediated by integrinDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
wound healing, spreading of epidermal cellsDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
amyloid precursor protein catabolic processDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of blood vessel endothelial cell migrationDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cyclin-dependent protein serine/threonine kinase activityDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epidermal growth factor-activated receptor activityDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathwayDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
spleen developmentDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
cell motilityDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
defense response to Gram-positive bacteriumDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to high density lipoprotein particle stimulusDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
commissural neuron axon guidanceDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of G1/S transition of mitotic cell cycleDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular endothelial cell proliferationDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
Notch signaling pathwayDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transportVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-modulating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of soundVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of adenylate cyclase activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of calcium ion transportVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of atrial cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
calcium ion importVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell action potential involved in contractionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during SA node cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transporter activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
calcium ion import across plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by hormonePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion homeostasisPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle contractionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion import across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
skeletal system developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
extraocular skeletal muscle developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transportVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
muscle contractionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
striated muscle contractionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum organizationVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
myoblast fusionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
neuromuscular junction developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
skeletal muscle adaptationVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of muscle contractionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
skeletal muscle fiber developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosolVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to caffeineVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion import across plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
immune system developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
heart developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cardiac muscle contraction by regulation of the release of sequestered calcium ionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic forelimb morphogenesisVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
camera-type eye developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of adenylate cyclase activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of muscle contractionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transport into cytosolVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac conductionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transport via high voltage-gated calcium channelVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell action potential involved in contractionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during AV node cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
cell communication by electrical coupling involved in cardiac conductionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during atrial cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion import across plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
inositol phosphate metabolic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phosphate biosynthetic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol phosphate biosynthetic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell population proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of B cell proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction in response to DNA damageATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
isotype switchingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of isotype switching to IgG isotypesATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloadingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitotic cell cycle phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of very-low-density lipoprotein particle remodelingBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nitrogen catabolite activation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoterBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular glucose homeostasisBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription by RNA polymerase IIBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell-cell junction assemblyBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Notch signaling pathwayBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of low-density lipoprotein particle clearanceBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular receptor signaling pathwayBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of type II interferon productionBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of interleukin-1 productionBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of interleukin-2 productionBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of interleukin-6 productionBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of tumor necrosis factor productionBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-17 productionBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
toll-like receptor 9 signaling pathwayBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of urea metabolic processBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular triglyceride homeostasisBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of insulin secretion involved in cellular response to glucose stimulusBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular bile acid receptor signaling pathwayBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to bacteriumBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of insulin receptor signaling pathwayBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
fatty acid homeostasisBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of insulin secretion involved in cellular response to glucose stimulusBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid biosynthetic processBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lipopolysaccharideBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to fatty acidBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to organonitrogen compoundBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 productionBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cholesterol metabolic processBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to bile acidBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of adipose tissue developmentBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidic acid biosynthetic processBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of glutamate metabolic processBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ammonia assimilation cycleBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell differentiationBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of inflammatory responseBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of receptor internalizationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of translationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA metabolic processAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
P-body assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
stress granule assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA transportAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
amino acid transmembrane transportSodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
amino acid transportSodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
neutral amino acid transportSodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
L-leucine transportSodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
proline transportSodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
carboxylic acid transmembrane transportSodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
biological_processHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of MAPK cascadeHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
potassium ion import across plasma membranePotassium channel subfamily K member 9Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transportPotassium channel subfamily K member 9Homo sapiens (human)
stabilization of membrane potentialPotassium channel subfamily K member 9Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium channel subfamily K member 9Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (182)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
iron ion bindingPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion bindingPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
lipid bindingPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
linoleate 13S-lipoxygenase activityPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
arachidonate 8(S)-lipoxygenase activityPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase activityPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
linoleate 9S-lipoxygenase activityPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
high voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
chloramphenicol O-acetyltransferase activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
TAP bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
peptide antigen bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
TAP bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
TFIID-class transcription factor complex bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
receptor tyrosine kinase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase regulator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent DNA/DNA annealing activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
MDM2/MDM4 family protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
disordered domain specific bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast growth factor bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
C-X3-C chemokine bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
insulin-like growth factor I bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
neuregulin bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
virus receptor activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
fibronectin bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein disulfide isomerase activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet-derived growth factor receptor bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
integrin bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
coreceptor activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell adhesion molecule bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
fibrinogen bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
carboxylic acid transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylcholine floppase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylethanolamine flippase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ceramide floppase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
floppase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
molecular adaptor activityIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
fibrinogen bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
integrin bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
lipopolysaccharide bindingPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
lipopolysaccharide immune receptor activityPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor activityPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
platelet activating factor receptor activityPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid bindingPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mitogen-activated protein kinase bindingPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled purinergic nucleotide receptor activityPlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
steroid hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activityCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
(S)-limonene 6-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
(S)-limonene 7-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
oxygen bindingCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
(R)-limonene 6-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
aromatase activityCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid omega-1 hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid epoxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen, reduced flavin or flavoprotein as one donor, and incorporation of one atom of oxygenCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
histamine receptor activityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Gq/11-coupled serotonin receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G-protein alpha-subunit binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
GTPase activator activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
protein binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein activityGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase activator activityGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
metalloendopeptidase activityDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
Notch bindingDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
interleukin-6 receptor bindingDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
integrin bindingDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
peptidase activityDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
metallopeptidase activityDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
SH3 domain bindingDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
cytokine bindingDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
PDZ domain bindingDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor bindingDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
metalloendopeptidase activity involved in amyloid precursor protein catabolic processDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
high voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
ankyrin bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
alpha-actinin bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activity involved SA node cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
C3HC4-type RING finger domain bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
high voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
small molecule bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
high voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
high voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
alpha-actinin bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activity involved in AV node cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
inositol-1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol heptakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 5-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 1-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 3-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol 5-diphosphate pentakisphosphate 5-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol diphosphate tetrakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloader activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription coregulator bindingBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor bindingBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid bindingBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid receptor activityBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific DNA bindingBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear retinoid X receptor bindingBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chenodeoxycholic acid bindingBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
epidermal growth factor receptor bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
neutral L-amino acid:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
amino acid transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
branched-chain amino acid:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
proline:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
histamine receptor activityHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor activityHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
potassium channel activityPotassium channel subfamily K member 9Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion leak channel activityPotassium channel subfamily K member 9Homo sapiens (human)
outward rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium channel subfamily K member 9Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (98)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
nucleusPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
cytoskeletonPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
adherens junctionPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionPolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
membranePolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomePolyunsaturated fatty acid lipoxygenase ALOX15BHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
photoreceptor outer segmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
perikaryonVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
intermediate filament cytoskeletonNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
ER to Golgi transport vesicle membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
phagocytic vesicle membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
early endosome membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
lumenal side of endoplasmic reticulum membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
MHC class I protein complexHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
PML bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
site of double-strand breakCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
germ cell nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell-cell junctionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet alpha granule membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
lamellipodium membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
filopodium membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
microvillus membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
ruffle membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
integrin alphav-beta3 complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
melanosomeIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
synapseIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
integrin alphaIIb-beta3 complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
glycinergic synapseIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
integrin complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
alphav-beta3 integrin-PKCalpha complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
alphav-beta3 integrin-IGF-1-IGF1R complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
alphav-beta3 integrin-HMGB1 complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
receptor complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
alphav-beta3 integrin-vitronectin complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
alpha9-beta1 integrin-ADAM8 complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
synapseIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
platelet alpha granule membraneIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
integrin alphaIIb-beta3 complexIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
blood microparticleIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
integrin complexIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membraneGlutamate receptor 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membranePlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
membranePlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
secretory granule membranePlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
tertiary granule membranePlatelet-activating factor receptorHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCytochrome P450 2C19Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synapseHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasm5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
synapse5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor complex5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
dendrite5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membraneGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
cell-cell junctionDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
ruffle membraneDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum lumenDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
actin cytoskeletonDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
membraneDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
membrane raftDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneDisintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
Z discVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
L-type voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfacePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
sarcoplasmic reticulumVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
T-tubuleVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
I bandVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
L-type voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic densityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
Z discVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
perikaryonVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic density membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
L-type voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
fibrillar centerInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
Elg1 RFC-like complexATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
euchromatinBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
receptor complexBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II transcription regulator complexBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusBile acid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
ribonucleoprotein complexAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synapseHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium channel subfamily K member 9Homo sapiens (human)
synaptic vesiclePotassium channel subfamily K member 9Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium channel subfamily K member 9Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (285)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID462896Cytotoxicity against MDCK cells at >25 uM2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-25, Volume: 53, Issue:6
Prediction and evaluation of protein farnesyltransferase inhibition by commercial drugs.
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1668967Drug metabolism assessed as biomimetic-metalloporphyrin (Cu(TDCIPP)) oxidation mediated metabolite formation by HPLC-MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID311932Inhibition of ASM in human H4 cells assessed as residual activity at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-24, Volume: 51, Issue:2
Identification of new functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase using a structure-property-activity relation model.
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID130468Antiallergic activity was evaluated using active anaphylactic test after po administration in mice1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-19, Volume: 37, Issue:17
[(3-Pyridylalkyl)piperidylidene]benzocycloheptapyridine derivatives as dual antagonists of PAF and histamine.
AID977599Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B1-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID130606Dose required to inhibit PAF-induced mortality1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-19, Volume: 37, Issue:17
[(3-Pyridylalkyl)piperidylidene]benzocycloheptapyridine derivatives as dual antagonists of PAF and histamine.
AID92393In vitro antagonist activity, determined by 50% inhibition of PAF-induced platelet aggregation of human platelet rich plasma when challenged with PAF1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 8, Issue:24
Dual antagonists of platelet activating factor and histamine. 3. Synthesis, biological activity and conformational implications of substituted N-acyl-bis-arylcycloheptapiperazines.
AID247089Effective dose for blockade of skin reactions induced by passive cutaneous anaphylaxis in rat by 2 hr after the subcutaneous administration2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID1215086Activation of human PXR expressed in human HepG2 (DPX-2) cells after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene based luminescent analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID161281Inhibition of human Potassium channel HERG expressed in mammalian cells2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-18, Volume: 13, Issue:16
Prediction of hERG potassium channel affinity by traditional and hologram qSAR methods.
AID524794Antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium falciparum GB4 after 72 hrs by SYBR green assay2009Nature chemical biology, Oct, Volume: 5, Issue:10
Genetic mapping of targets mediating differential chemical phenotypes in Plasmodium falciparum.
AID1668949Intrinsic clearance in human liver microsomes at 10 uM incubated up to 60 mins in presence of NADPH by LC-MS/MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID699539Inhibition of human liver OATP1B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID588208Literature-mined public compounds from Lowe et al phospholipidosis modelling dataset2010Molecular pharmaceutics, Oct-04, Volume: 7, Issue:5
Predicting phospholipidosis using machine learning.
AID1193492Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound in water at RT after 4 hrs by 96 well plate method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID1193499Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound simulated intestinal fluid at pH 6.8 at RT after 24 hrs by shake-flask method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID1409609Cytotoxicity of compound against Vero E6 cells by MTT assay.2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID658408Antiproliferative activity against human MCF7 cells assessed as growth inhibition after 144 hrs by crystal violet staining method2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 22, Issue:8
Design and synthesis of thiourea derivatives containing a benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridine moiety as potential antitumor and anti-inflammatory agents.
AID732420Efflux ratio of permeability from basolateral to apical side over apical to basolateral in pig LLC-PK1 cells overexpressing human MDR1 relative to efflux ratio in parental cell line2013ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-10, Volume: 4, Issue:1
De novo prediction of p-glycoprotein-mediated efflux liability for druglike compounds.
AID458626Antagonist activity at histamine H1 receptor in Dunkin-Hartley guinea pig ileum assessed as inhibition of histamine-induced contractions at 3 umol/L2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 18, Issue:4
Stereoselective synthesis of desloratadine derivatives as antagonist of histamine.
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID755455Antagonist activity at human GTS-tagged FXR at 15 uM after 20 mins by TR-FRET assay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 21, Issue:14
Development of time resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based assay for FXR antagonist discovery.
AID113865Inhibitory effect on histamine-induced increase in vascular permeability in mice upon oral administration1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-03, Volume: 38, Issue:3
Amphoteric drugs. 3. Synthesis and antiallergic activity of 3-[(5,11-dihydro[1]benzoxepino[4,3-b]pyridin-11- ylidene)piperidino]propionic acid derivatives and related compounds.
AID420669Lipophilicity, log D at pH 7.02009European journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 44, Issue:5
GRIND-based 3D-QSAR and CoMFA to investigate topics dominated by hydrophobic interactions: the case of hERG K+ channel blockers.
AID254775Inhibitory concentration against platelet activating factor receptor2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-20, Volume: 48, Issue:21
Designed multiple ligands. An emerging drug discovery paradigm.
AID1193497Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound PBS at pH 7.4 at RT after 24 hrs by shake-flask method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID524793Antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium falciparum Dd2 after 72 hrs by SYBR green assay2009Nature chemical biology, Oct, Volume: 5, Issue:10
Genetic mapping of targets mediating differential chemical phenotypes in Plasmodium falciparum.
AID701311Ratio of brain to plasma ratio in mdr1a deficient mouse to brain to plasma ratio in mdr1a expressing mouse at 5 mg/kg, iv2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 55, Issue:11
Structural modifications that alter the P-glycoprotein efflux properties of compounds.
AID684453Cytotoxicity against human MDA-MB-231 cells after 72 hrs by crystal violet staining2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-01, Volume: 22, Issue:19
Synthesis and biological evaluation of cyanoguanidine derivatives of loratadine.
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID1473779Ratio of drug concentration at steady state in human at 10 mg, po QD after 24 hrs to IC50 for human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID547621Cytotoxicity against BESM cells after 88 hrs by HTS assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Aug, Volume: 54, Issue:8
Image-based high-throughput drug screening targeting the intracellular stage of Trypanosoma cruzi, the agent of Chagas' disease.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1210014Inhibition of recombinant CYP2J2 (unknown origin)-mediated astemizole O-demethylation assessed as remaining activity at 30 uM after 5 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis relative to control2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID1525558Inhibition of human TASK3 expressed in HEK293 cells by Ti+ flux assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-27, Volume: 62, Issue:22
TASK Channels Pharmacology: New Challenges in Drug Design.
AID1668952Octanol/water partition coefficient, log D of compound at pH 7.4 by shake-flask method2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID977602Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B3-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID1169511Displacement of [3H]mepyramine from human histamine H1 receptor expressed in Sf9 cells by scintillation counting method2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 57, Issue:22
Loratadine and analogues: discovery and preliminary structure-activity relationship of inhibitors of the amino acid transporter B(0)AT2.
AID247077Effective dose for blockade of skin reactions induced by Ascaris allergens in rat by 2 hr after the subcutaneous administration2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID462898Antitrypanosomal activity against Trypanosoma cruzi2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-25, Volume: 53, Issue:6
Prediction and evaluation of protein farnesyltransferase inhibition by commercial drugs.
AID658409Antiproliferative activity against human MDA-MB-231 cells assessed as growth inhibition after 144 hrs by crystal violet staining method2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 22, Issue:8
Design and synthesis of thiourea derivatives containing a benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridine moiety as potential antitumor and anti-inflammatory agents.
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID183460Intravenous dose required to reduce the lowering of the arterial blood pressure caused by PAF1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-19, Volume: 37, Issue:17
[(3-Pyridylalkyl)piperidylidene]benzocycloheptapyridine derivatives as dual antagonists of PAF and histamine.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1193494Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound in simulated gastric fluid at pH 1.2 at RT after 4 hrs by 96 well plate method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID237615Calculated partition coefficient (clogD7.4) log D7.4 = log P - log(1 + 10 pKa-7.4)2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID462894Inhibition of protein farnesyltransferase-mediated farnesylation of GFP-tagged H-Ras protein overexpressed in MDCK cells assessed as inhibition of protein localization into golgi and plasma membrane at 25 uM after 24 hrs by Hoechst 34580 staining-based co2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-25, Volume: 53, Issue:6
Prediction and evaluation of protein farnesyltransferase inhibition by commercial drugs.
AID1409607IC50 for antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 in the Vero E6 cell line at 48 h by immunofluorescence-based assay (detecting the viral NP protein in the nucleus of the Vero E6 cells).2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID237721Solubility in water2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID247079Effective dose for inhibition of skin reactions induced by histamine in guinea pig by 2 hr after the subcutaneous administration2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID1210017Inhibition of CYP2C9 in human liver microsomes using diclofenac as substrate after 8 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID1209972Inhibition of CYP2C19 in human liver microsomes using S-mephenytoin as substrate after 8 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID1215096Activation of human PXR expressed in human HepG2 (DPX-2) cells after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene based luminescent analysis relative to rifampicin2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID247061Effective dose for inhibition of skin reactions induced by serotonin in rat by 2 hr after the subcutaneous administration2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID684452Cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells after 72 hrs by crystal violet staining2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-01, Volume: 22, Issue:19
Synthesis and biological evaluation of cyanoguanidine derivatives of loratadine.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1668948Binding affinity to human H1 histamine receptor expressed in CHO cells after 1 hr by calcium 5 dye-based FLIPR assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID79044Tested for concentration required to inhibit H1 histamine -induced guinea pig ileum contraction1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-19, Volume: 37, Issue:17
[(3-Pyridylalkyl)piperidylidene]benzocycloheptapyridine derivatives as dual antagonists of PAF and histamine.
AID247083Effective dose for the inhibition of 48/80-induced lethal anaphylactic reaction was determined in rat by 1 hour after subcutaneous administration2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID139398Tested for effect on central nervous system in mice at 100 mg/kg peroral dose barbiturate-sleeping time (BST)1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-19, Volume: 37, Issue:17
[(3-Pyridylalkyl)piperidylidene]benzocycloheptapyridine derivatives as dual antagonists of PAF and histamine.
AID1193498Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound simulated gastric fluid at pH 1.2 at RT after 24 hrs by shake-flask method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID624628Drug-stimulated Pgp ATPase activity ratio determined in MDR1-Sf9 cell membranes with test compound at a concentration of 20uM2001The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Nov, Volume: 299, Issue:2
Rational use of in vitro P-glycoprotein assays in drug discovery.
AID1193628Inhibition of human FAAH using [ethanolamine 1-3H] substrate assessed as radioactivity at 10 uM by liquid scintillation counting analysis2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Loratadine analogues as MAGL inhibitors.
AID1409608AUC (viral infection %) for SARS-CoV-2 in the Vero E6 cell line at 48 h by immunofluorescence-based assay (detecting the viral NP protein in the nucleus of the Vero E6 cells).2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID1169510Reversible inhibition of eGFP-tagged human B0AT2 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in proline-induced inward current at 100 uM measured post drug wash out by patch clamp assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 57, Issue:22
Loratadine and analogues: discovery and preliminary structure-activity relationship of inhibitors of the amino acid transporter B(0)AT2.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID249215Onset action against Ascaris allergens induced cutaneous reactions was determined by oral administration at four times the peak effect dose in dog2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID87373Ex vivo inhibition of [3H]mepyramine binding to mouse brain membrane H1 receptor after oral administration1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-03, Volume: 38, Issue:3
Amphoteric drugs. 3. Synthesis and antiallergic activity of 3-[(5,11-dihydro[1]benzoxepino[4,3-b]pyridin-11- ylidene)piperidino]propionic acid derivatives and related compounds.
AID243151Inhibitory concentration against potassium channel HERG2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-02, Volume: 15, Issue:11
A discriminant model constructed by the support vector machine method for HERG potassium channel inhibitors.
AID1169508Inhibition of eGFP-tagged human B0AT2 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in proline-induced inward current at 100 uM by patch clamp assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 57, Issue:22
Loratadine and analogues: discovery and preliminary structure-activity relationship of inhibitors of the amino acid transporter B(0)AT2.
AID1409614Overall antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 (isolate France/IDF0372/2020) in the Vero E6 cell line at 48 h based on three assays 1) detection of viral RNA by qRT-PCR (targeting the N-gene), 2) plaque assay using lysate 3 days after addition of compound 2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID1668951Apparent permeability in RRCK cells2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID1668958Drug metabolism in Nocardia ATCC 21271 assessed as metabolite formation by HPLC-MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID1193493Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound in PBS at pH 7.4 at RT after 4 hrs by 96 well plate method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID24562Pharmacokinetic parameter :half life in humans was reported1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-12, Volume: 41, Issue:6
Molecular properties and pharmacokinetic behavior of cetirizine, a zwitterionic H1-receptor antagonist.
AID241255Inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase activity in human whole blood assay; not tested2004Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 14, Issue:22
Cetirizine and loratadine-based antihistamines with 5-lipoxygenase inhibitory activity.
AID1193496Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound in water at RT after 24 hrs by shake-flask method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID1668965Drug metabolism assessed as electrochemical transformations-mediated metabolite formation by HPLC-MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID237685Lipophilicity determined as logarithm of the partition coefficient in the alkane/water system2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-05, Volume: 48, Issue:9
Calculating virtual log P in the alkane/water system (log P(N)(alk)) and its derived parameters deltalog P(N)(oct-alk) and log D(pH)(alk).
AID281733Ex vivo displacement of [3H]mepyramine from brain histamine H1 receptor in orally dosed Swiss Albino mouse2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-02, Volume: 47, Issue:25
Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of novel histamine H1 antagonists: indolylpiperidinyl benzoic acid derivatives.
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID135327BBB penetration classification2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 43, Issue:11
Predicting blood-brain barrier permeation from three-dimensional molecular structure.
AID1193626Inhibition of human recombinant MAGL using 2-arachidonoylglycerol substrate assessed as arachidonic acid at 10 uM by HPLC analysis2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Loratadine analogues as MAGL inhibitors.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID281740Inhibition of CYP3A4 in human microsomes at 25 uM2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-02, Volume: 47, Issue:25
Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of novel histamine H1 antagonists: indolylpiperidinyl benzoic acid derivatives.
AID699540Inhibition of human liver OATP1B3 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID254701Inhibitory concentration against histamine H1 receptor2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-20, Volume: 48, Issue:21
Designed multiple ligands. An emerging drug discovery paradigm.
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID247060Effective dose for inhibition of skin reactions induced by histamine in rat by 2 hr after the subcutaneous administration2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID19424Partition coefficient (logD7.4)2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-19, Volume: 44, Issue:15
ElogD(oct): a tool for lipophilicity determination in drug discovery. 2. Basic and neutral compounds.
AID183446Tested for dose required to inhibit antigen induced increased permeability1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-19, Volume: 37, Issue:17
[(3-Pyridylalkyl)piperidylidene]benzocycloheptapyridine derivatives as dual antagonists of PAF and histamine.
AID192816Tested at 10 (mg/kg) intravenous dose for percent inhibition of the arterial blood pressure in normotensive rats caused by histamine1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-19, Volume: 37, Issue:17
[(3-Pyridylalkyl)piperidylidene]benzocycloheptapyridine derivatives as dual antagonists of PAF and histamine.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID247086Effective dose for inhibition of skin reactions induced by Ascaris allergens in guinea pig by 2 hr after the subcutaneous administration2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID408340Inhibition of human ERG expressed in CHO cells by whole cell patch clamp technique2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 16, Issue:11
Support vector machines classification of hERG liabilities based on atom types.
AID1210015Inhibition of CYP1A2 in human liver microsomes using phenacetin as substrate after 8 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1215094Competitive binding affinity to human PXR LBD (111 to 434) by TR-FRET assay2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID281737Effect on QT interval prolongation in Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs at 10 mg/kg, iv2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-02, Volume: 47, Issue:25
Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of novel histamine H1 antagonists: indolylpiperidinyl benzoic acid derivatives.
AID1668947Drug metabolism assessed as Bacillus megaterium CYP102A1 MCYP0012-mediated metabolite formation by HPLC-MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID237033pKa1 value was determined2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID1668954Drug metabolism in human liver microsomes assessed as metabolite formation by HPLC-MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID755446Agonist activity at PXR (unknown origin) expressed in human HepG2 cells assessed as induction of CYP3A4 transactivation at 10 uM after 16 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 21, Issue:14
Development of time resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based assay for FXR antagonist discovery.
AID1129361Unbound fraction in HEK293 cell homogenate at 0.1 uM by equilibrium dialysis based UPLC-MS/MS analysis2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-10, Volume: 57, Issue:7
A high-throughput cell-based method to predict the unbound drug fraction in the brain.
AID679465TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Daunorubicin efflux (Daunorubicin: ? uM) in G185 cells2001Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Aug, Volume: 29, Issue:8
Evaluation of the interaction of loratadine and desloratadine with P-glycoprotein.
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1377955Antiallergic activity in DNP-BSA-stimulated rat RBL2H3 cells assessed as inhibition of anti-DNP-IgE-mediated degranulation by measuring beta-hexosaminidase activity at 20 microg/ml pre-incubated for 1 hr followed by DNP-BSA stimulation by fluorescence ass2017Journal of natural products, 07-28, Volume: 80, Issue:7
Spirograterpene A, a Tetracyclic Spiro-Diterpene with a Fused 5/5/5/5 Ring System from the Deep-Sea-Derived Fungus Penicillium granulatum MCCC 3A00475.
AID247072Effective dose for blockade of skin reactions induced by histamine in guinea pig by 2 hr after the subcutaneous administration2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID1668957Drug level in rabbit liver microsomes treated with loratadine assessed as compound formation by HPLC-MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID524796Antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium falciparum W2 after 72 hrs by SYBR green assay2009Nature chemical biology, Oct, Volume: 5, Issue:10
Genetic mapping of targets mediating differential chemical phenotypes in Plasmodium falciparum.
AID237617Partition coefficient (logP)2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID624629Inhibition of Pgp expressed in MDR1-MDCKII cells measured by calcein-AM assay2001The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Nov, Volume: 299, Issue:2
Rational use of in vitro P-glycoprotein assays in drug discovery.
AID1668962Drug metabolism in Streptomyces fradiae ATCC 15438 assessed as metabolite formation by HPLC-MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID1215093Activation of rat PXR expressed in human HepG2 cells up to 46 uM after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene based luminescent analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID547622Antitrypanosomal activity against Trypanosoma cruzi amastigotes infected in BESM cells measured after 88 hrs postinfection by HTS assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Aug, Volume: 54, Issue:8
Image-based high-throughput drug screening targeting the intracellular stage of Trypanosoma cruzi, the agent of Chagas' disease.
AID1215089Activation of human PXR expressed in human HepG2 (DPX-2) cells assessed as induction of CYP3A4 after 24 hrs by luminescent analysis relative to rifampicin2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID1207748Inhibition of Cav1.2 current measured using QPatch automatic path clamp system in CHO cells expressing Cav1.2, beta-2 and alpha-2/delta-1 subunits2013Scientific reports, , Volume: 3MICE models: superior to the HERG model in predicting Torsade de Pointes.
AID247055Effective dose for blockade of skin reactions induced by histamine in rat by 2 hr after the subcutaneous administration2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID238789Binding affinity for H1 histamine receptor expressed in CHO cells2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID140564Tested for effect on central nervous system in mice at 100 mg/kg peroral dose for spontaneous motor activity (SMA) expressed as percentage relative to control1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-19, Volume: 37, Issue:17
[(3-Pyridylalkyl)piperidylidene]benzocycloheptapyridine derivatives as dual antagonists of PAF and histamine.
AID47776The compound dose required for 50% block of H1 histamine activity, when administarted intra venously in cats1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 32, Issue:9
Benzo- and pyrido-1,4-oxazepin-5-ones and -thiones: synthesis and structure-activity relationships of a new series of H1 antihistamines.
AID547804Selectivity window, ratio of EC50 for BESM cells to EC50 for Trypanosoma cruzi amastigotes infected in BESM cells2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Aug, Volume: 54, Issue:8
Image-based high-throughput drug screening targeting the intracellular stage of Trypanosoma cruzi, the agent of Chagas' disease.
AID89260Concentration required to cause 50% inhibition of platelet activating factor (PAF)-induced platelet aggregation of human platelet rich plasma when challenged with 25 nM PAF.1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 34, Issue:1
Dual antagonists of platelet activating factor and histamine. Identification of structural requirements for dual activity of N-Acyl-4-(5,6-dihydro-11H-benzo [5,6]cyclohepta-[1,2-b]pyridin-11-ylidene)piperidines.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID624622Apparent permeability (Papp) from apical to basolateral side determined in MDR1-MDCKII cells2001The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Nov, Volume: 299, Issue:2
Rational use of in vitro P-glycoprotein assays in drug discovery.
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID684454Cytotoxicity against human HT-29 cells after 72 hrs by crystal violet staining2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-01, Volume: 22, Issue:19
Synthesis and biological evaluation of cyanoguanidine derivatives of loratadine.
AID699541Inhibition of human liver OATP2B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E3S uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID521220Inhibition of neurosphere proliferation of mouse neural precursor cells by MTT assay2007Nature chemical biology, May, Volume: 3, Issue:5
Chemical genetics reveals a complex functional ground state of neural stem cells.
AID1473778Drug concentration at steady state in human at 10 mg, po QD after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1209973Inhibition of CYP2D6 in human liver microsomes using dextromethorphan as substrate after 8 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID1668963Drug metabolism assessed as Bacillus megaterium CYP102A1 MCYP0160-mediated metabolite formation by HPLC-MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID658410Antiproliferative activity against human HT-29 cells assessed as growth inhibition after 144 hrs by crystal violet staining method2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 22, Issue:8
Design and synthesis of thiourea derivatives containing a benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridine moiety as potential antitumor and anti-inflammatory agents.
AID524790Antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 after 72 hrs by SYBR green assay2009Nature chemical biology, Oct, Volume: 5, Issue:10
Genetic mapping of targets mediating differential chemical phenotypes in Plasmodium falciparum.
AID1193641Antagonist activity at histamine H1 receptor in guinea pig jejunum assessed as reduction in histamine-induced contractions2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Loratadine analogues as MAGL inhibitors.
AID458627Antagonist activity at histamine H1 receptor in Dunkin-Hartley guinea pig ileum assessed as inhibition of histamine-induced contractions at 10 umol/L2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 18, Issue:4
Stereoselective synthesis of desloratadine derivatives as antagonist of histamine.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID524791Antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium falciparum 7G8 after 72 hrs by SYBR green assay2009Nature chemical biology, Oct, Volume: 5, Issue:10
Genetic mapping of targets mediating differential chemical phenotypes in Plasmodium falciparum.
AID576612Inhibition of human ERG2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 46, Issue:2
Predicting hERG activities of compounds from their 3D structures: development and evaluation of a global descriptors based QSAR model.
AID247082Effective dose for inhibition of skin reactions induced by substance P in guinea pig by 2 hr after the subcutaneous administration2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID78182Histamine induced in lethality in guinea pigs at 8 hr after oral dose of 0.3 mg/kg1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-03, Volume: 38, Issue:3
Amphoteric drugs. 3. Synthesis and antiallergic activity of 3-[(5,11-dihydro[1]benzoxepino[4,3-b]pyridin-11- ylidene)piperidino]propionic acid derivatives and related compounds.
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID1209974Inhibition of CYP3A4 in human liver microsomes using midazolam as substrate after 8 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID1169507Inhibition of eGFP-tagged human B0AT2 expressed in HEK293 cells measured within 10 mins by [3H]proline uptake assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 57, Issue:22
Loratadine and analogues: discovery and preliminary structure-activity relationship of inhibitors of the amino acid transporter B(0)AT2.
AID247044Effective dose for the inhibition of histamine induced a lethal shock was determined in rat by 3 hours after oral administration2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID755445Agonist activity at PXR (unknown origin) expressed in human HepG2 cells assessed as induction of CYP3A4 transactivation after 16 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 21, Issue:14
Development of time resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based assay for FXR antagonist discovery.
AID1215087Activation of human PXR expressed in human HepG2 (DPX-2) cells assessed as induction of CYP3A4 after 24 hrs by luminescent analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID386623Inhibition of 4-(4-(dimethylamino)styryl)-N-methylpyridinium uptake at human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells at 100 uM by confocal microscopy2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 51, Issue:19
Structural requirements for drug inhibition of the liver specific human organic cation transport protein 1.
AID524795Antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium falciparum HB3 after 72 hrs by SYBR green assay2009Nature chemical biology, Oct, Volume: 5, Issue:10
Genetic mapping of targets mediating differential chemical phenotypes in Plasmodium falciparum.
AID16029Pharmacokinetic parameter :drug bound to plasma was reported1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-12, Volume: 41, Issue:6
Molecular properties and pharmacokinetic behavior of cetirizine, a zwitterionic H1-receptor antagonist.
AID404304Effect on human MRP2-mediated estradiol-17-beta-glucuronide transport in Sf9 cells inverted membrane vesicles relative to control2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-12, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Prediction and identification of drug interactions with the human ATP-binding cassette transporter multidrug-resistance associated protein 2 (MRP2; ABCC2).
AID130607Tested for dose required to inhibit endotoxin induced mortality in mice1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-19, Volume: 37, Issue:17
[(3-Pyridylalkyl)piperidylidene]benzocycloheptapyridine derivatives as dual antagonists of PAF and histamine.
AID624626Ratio of apparent permeability from basolateral to apical side over apical to basolateral side determined in MDR1-MDCKII cells2001The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Nov, Volume: 299, Issue:2
Rational use of in vitro P-glycoprotein assays in drug discovery.
AID281741Inhibition of increase in histamine-induced cutaneous vascular permeability in orally dosed Wistar rat model after 1 hrs2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-02, Volume: 47, Issue:25
Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of novel histamine H1 antagonists: indolylpiperidinyl benzoic acid derivatives.
AID1215095Competitive binding affinity to human PXR LBD (111 to 434) by TR-FRET assay relative to SR128132011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID462891Inhibition of protein farnesyltransferase by continuous fluorescence assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-25, Volume: 53, Issue:6
Prediction and evaluation of protein farnesyltransferase inhibition by commercial drugs.
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID624623Apparent permeability (Papp) from basolateral to apical side determined in MDR1-MDCKII cells2001The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Nov, Volume: 299, Issue:2
Rational use of in vitro P-glycoprotein assays in drug discovery.
AID1193495Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound in simulated intestinal fluid at pH 6.8 at RT after 4 hrs by 96 well plate method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID234738Selectivity as the ratio of ID50 value to that of ED50 value in mice.1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-03, Volume: 38, Issue:3
Amphoteric drugs. 3. Synthesis and antiallergic activity of 3-[(5,11-dihydro[1]benzoxepino[4,3-b]pyridin-11- ylidene)piperidino]propionic acid derivatives and related compounds.
AID420668Inhibition of human ERG in MCF7 cells2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 44, Issue:5
GRIND-based 3D-QSAR and CoMFA to investigate topics dominated by hydrophobic interactions: the case of hERG K+ channel blockers.
AID1668950Intrinsic clearance in human hepatocytes at 0.2 nmol assessed per million cells up to 240 mins in presence of NADPH by LC-MS/MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID701301Efflux ratio of permeability in MDCK cells expressing human MDR12012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 55, Issue:11
Structural modifications that alter the P-glycoprotein efflux properties of compounds.
AID1409613Selectivity ratio: ratio of AUC (viral infection %) of SARS-CoV-2 in the Vero E6 cell line compared to AUC (cytotoxicity %) of compound against Vero E6 cells by MTT assay.2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID161773Concentration required to inhibit PAF-induced maximum aggregation1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-19, Volume: 37, Issue:17
[(3-Pyridylalkyl)piperidylidene]benzocycloheptapyridine derivatives as dual antagonists of PAF and histamine.
AID87521Binding affinity to histamine H1 receptor in rat brain membranes was evaluated using [3H]-pyrilamine as radioligand1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 34, Issue:1
Dual antagonists of platelet activating factor and histamine. Identification of structural requirements for dual activity of N-Acyl-4-(5,6-dihydro-11H-benzo [5,6]cyclohepta-[1,2-b]pyridin-11-ylidene)piperidines.
AID1210013Inhibition of recombinant CYP2J2 (unknown origin)-mediated terfenadine hydroxylation assessed as remaining activity at 30 uM after 5 mins by LC-MS analysis relative to control2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID1193500Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility, log S of the compound2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery.
AID247064Effective dose for the inhibition of 48/80-induced lethal anaphylactic reaction was determined in rat by 2 hour after oral administration2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID1668959Drug metabolism in Mucor rouxii UC7470 assessed as metabolite formation by HPLC-MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID1409611AUC (cytotoxicity %) of compound against Vero E6 cells by MTT assay.2020Nature, 07, Volume: 583, Issue:7816
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.
AID1668964Drug metabolism assessed as Bacillus megaterium CYP102A1 MCYP-P1.2-C11-mediated metabolite formation by HPLC-MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID249216Duration of action against Ascaris allergens induced cutaneous reactions was determined by oral administration at four times the peak effect dose in dog2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID1210016Inhibition of CYP2C8 in human liver microsomes using paclitaxel as substrate after 8 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 40, Issue:5
Identifying a selective substrate and inhibitor pair for the evaluation of CYP2J2 activity.
AID238825Binding affinity towards human histamine H1 receptor expressed in CHO-K1 cells2004Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 14, Issue:22
Cetirizine and loratadine-based antihistamines with 5-lipoxygenase inhibitory activity.
AID1169509Activation of eGFP-tagged human B0AT2 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as induction of inward current at 100 uM by patch clamp assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 57, Issue:22
Loratadine and analogues: discovery and preliminary structure-activity relationship of inhibitors of the amino acid transporter B(0)AT2.
AID458628Antagonist activity at histamine H1 receptor in Dunkin-Hartley guinea pig ileum assessed as inhibition of histamine-induced contractions at 30 umol/L2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 18, Issue:4
Stereoselective synthesis of desloratadine derivatives as antagonist of histamine.
AID247084Peak effective dose for inhibition of skin reactions induced by Ascaris allergens in dog by 2 hr after the subcutaneous administration2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID1473777AUC in human at 10 mg, po QD after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID82355K+ channel blocking activity in human embryonic kidney cells expressing HERG Kv11.12002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-29, Volume: 45, Issue:18
Toward a pharmacophore for drugs inducing the long QT syndrome: insights from a CoMFA study of HERG K(+) channel blockers.
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID588220Literature-mined public compounds from Kruhlak et al phospholipidosis modelling dataset2008Toxicology mechanisms and methods, , Volume: 18, Issue:2-3
Development of a phospholipidosis database and predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models.
AID524792Antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium falciparum D10 after 72 hrs by SYBR green assay2009Nature chemical biology, Oct, Volume: 5, Issue:10
Genetic mapping of targets mediating differential chemical phenotypes in Plasmodium falciparum.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID1668956Drug metabolism assessed as recombinant human CYP3A4-mediated metabolite formation by HPLC-MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-09, Volume: 63, Issue:13
Late-Stage Lead Diversification Coupled with Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Identify New Structure-Activity Relationship Vectors at Nanomole-Scale Synthesis: Application to Loratadine, a Human Histamine H
AID47777The compound dose required to elicit marked cortical slowing and spindling, when administarted intra venously in cats1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 32, Issue:9
Benzo- and pyrido-1,4-oxazepin-5-ones and -thiones: synthesis and structure-activity relationships of a new series of H1 antihistamines.
AID22246Pharmacokinetic parameter :volume apparent of distribution was reported1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-12, Volume: 41, Issue:6
Molecular properties and pharmacokinetic behavior of cetirizine, a zwitterionic H1-receptor antagonist.
AID183447Tested for dose required to inhibit endotoxin induced mortality in rats1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-19, Volume: 37, Issue:17
[(3-Pyridylalkyl)piperidylidene]benzocycloheptapyridine derivatives as dual antagonists of PAF and histamine.
AID755454Antagonist activity at human GTS-tagged FXR after 20 mins by TR-FRET assay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-15, Volume: 21, Issue:14
Development of time resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based assay for FXR antagonist discovery.
AID311935Partition coefficient, log P of the compound2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-24, Volume: 51, Issue:2
Identification of new functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase using a structure-property-activity relation model.
AID311934Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-24, Volume: 51, Issue:2
Identification of new functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase using a structure-property-activity relation model.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1508628Confirmatory qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1508629Cell Viability qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1508627Counterscreen qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: GLuc-NoTag assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1745854NCATS anti-infectives library activity on HEK293 viability as a counter-qHTS vs the C. elegans viability qHTS2023Disease models & mechanisms, 03-01, Volume: 16, Issue:3
In vivo quantitative high-throughput screening for drug discovery and comparative toxicology.
AID1347405qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS LOPAC collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID588378qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation
AID1347410qHTS for inhibitors of adenylyl cyclases using a fission yeast platform: a pilot screen against the NCATS LOPAC library2019Cellular signalling, 08, Volume: 60A fission yeast platform for heterologous expression of mammalian adenylyl cyclases and high throughput screening.
AID504836Inducers of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response (ERSR) in human glioma: Validation2002The Journal of biological chemistry, Apr-19, Volume: 277, Issue:16
Sustained ER Ca2+ depletion suppresses protein synthesis and induces activation-enhanced cell death in mast cells.
AID1347151Optimization of GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID588349qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation of Cytotoxic Assay
AID1347045Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot counterscreen GloSensor control cell line2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347050Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr2) antagonism - Pilot subtype selectivity assay2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347058CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - HTRF assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347049Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot screen2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347059CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - Alpha assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347057CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - LANCE assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
AID1794808Fluorescence-based screening to identify small molecule inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase (Pf-apPOL).2014Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 19, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Assay to Identify Inhibitors of the Apicoplast DNA Polymerase from Plasmodium falciparum.
AID1794808Fluorescence-based screening to identify small molecule inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase (Pf-apPOL).
AID1346037Human H1 receptor (Histamine receptors)2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Norpiperidine imidazoazepines as a new class of potent, selective, and nonsedative H1 antihistamines.
AID1346959Human B0AT2 (Neutral amino acid transporter subfamily)2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 57, Issue:22
Loratadine and analogues: discovery and preliminary structure-activity relationship of inhibitors of the amino acid transporter B(0)AT2.
AID1798265H4R Radioligand Binding Assay from Article 10.1124/jpet.105.087965: \\Evaluation of histamine H1-, H2-, and H3-receptor ligands at the human histamine H4 receptor: identification of 4-methylhistamine as the first potent and selective H4 receptor agonist.\\2005The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Sep, Volume: 314, Issue:3
Evaluation of histamine H1-, H2-, and H3-receptor ligands at the human histamine H4 receptor: identification of 4-methylhistamine as the first potent and selective H4 receptor agonist.
AID1159550Human Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) Inhibitor Screening2015Nature cell biology, Nov, Volume: 17, Issue:11
6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase links oxidative PPP, lipogenesis and tumour growth by inhibiting LKB1-AMPK signalling.
AID1224864HCS microscopy assay (F508del-CFTR)2016PloS one, , Volume: 11, Issue:10
Increasing the Endoplasmic Reticulum Pool of the F508del Allele of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Leads to Greater Folding Correction by Small Molecule Therapeutics.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (1,183)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-199039 (3.30)18.7374
1990's234 (19.78)18.2507
2000's525 (44.38)29.6817
2010's300 (25.36)24.3611
2020's85 (7.19)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 94.51

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index94.51 (24.57)
Research Supply Index7.48 (2.92)
Research Growth Index5.25 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index252.20 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.92 (0.95)

This Compound (94.51)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials462 (35.08%)5.53%
Reviews107 (8.12%)6.00%
Case Studies92 (6.99%)4.05%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other656 (49.81%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (77)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Phase II Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effect of Loratadine Associated to Rapamicyn in Patients With Lymphangioleiomyomatosis [NCT05190627]Phase 262 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-01Recruiting
A Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Quality of Life (QOL) in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria Dosed With AERIUS Tablets (Desloratadine 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg Once Daily) [NCT00536380]Phase 4314 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Clinical Trial to Assess Onset of Action of Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray Delivered in a Single Spray (MP-AzeFlu) in the Treatment of Allergen-Induced Allergic Rhinitis Symptoms in Comparison to Placebo and Free Combinati [NCT03004131]Phase 482 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-07Completed
Personalized Treatment Algorithms for Difficult-to-treat Asthma: Bench to Community [NCT04179461]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-16Completed
A Multi-Center, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study Investigating the Effect of Montelukast in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis-Spring 2001 Study [NCT00972738]Phase 31,214 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study Investigating the Clinical Effect of Montelukast in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis-Fall Study [NCT00960141]Phase 3829 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-08-31Completed
An Exploratory Phase III, Randomised, Double-blind, Therapeutic Single Dose-related Effect, Parallel Group Study to Assess and Compare the Effects of 5 mg vs. 20 mg Desloratadine on Skin Lesions in Patients With Chronic Urticaria (CU) [NCT00598611]Phase 329 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
The Study of Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Prapchompoothaweep Remedy Crude Drug and Loratadine for Treatment in Allergic Rhinitis Patients (Clinical Trials Phase II) [NCT03640273]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-23Completed
Effect Comparison of Acupuncture Combined With Moxibustion and Loratadine for Perennial Allergic Rhinitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02339714]Phase 298 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety of Combination Montelukast/Loratadine (MK-0476A) in Mexican Patients With Allergic Rhinitis [NCT01673620]Phase 369 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-04Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study Investigating the Clinical Effect of Montelukast in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Over a 4-Week Treatment Period-Fall 2001 [NCT00963469]Phase 31,079 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Dose-ranging, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Phenylephrine HCl Immediate Release Tablets on Nasal Congestion in Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis [NCT01330017]Phase 2539 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Randomized Clinical Study for Efficacy Assessment Between Cloratadd-D, Loratadine + Pseudoephedrine (Coated Pill), Produced by EMS S/A Laboratories and Allegra-D , Produced by Sanofi-Aventis for Patients With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis. [NCT01228630]Phase 3156 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Crossover Manufacturing Transfer Study Comparing the Bioequivalence of a Single Oral Dose of Claritin-D® 12-Hour Extended Release Tablet (Loratadine 5mg/Pseudoephedrine Sulfate 120 mg, Manufacturer-SAG) to a Single Oral Dose of Claritin-D® 1 [NCT03517930]Phase 152 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-17Completed
Randomized Phase II Pilot Study of Loratadine for the Prevention of Pain Caused by the Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Pegfilgrastim [NCT01311336]Phase 255 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-05-31Recruiting
An Open Label, Multi-center Study to Evaluate Sensory Attributes of an Antihistamine Product [NCT04162795]Phase 4468 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-12Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Benjakul Extract Capsules and Loratadine for Treatment Allergic Rhinitis Patients (Clinical Trial Phase II) [NCT03376594]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-30Completed
Quality of Life in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis: a Clinical Trial Comparing the Use of Bilastine Versus Loratadine [NCT02513290]Phase 473 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Protocol for Post-approval Commitment Study of Loratadine for PPK Analysis in Japanese Pediatric and Adults Patients [NCT00730912]Phase 4261 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study Investigating the Clinical Effects of Montelukast in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis--Spring Study [NCT00979901]Phase 31,577 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-03-31Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study Investigating the Clinical Effect of Combination Montelukast/Loratadine in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis-Fall Study [NCT00963599]Phase 3907 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-09-30Completed
The Prophylactic Use of Loratadine for Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Induced Bone Pain in Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Stem Cell Mobilization [NCT04211259]Early Phase 170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-18Recruiting
Comparative, Randomized, Single-Dose, 3-way Crossover Bioavailability Study of Sandoz Inc. and Schering (Claritin) 10 mg Loratadine Tablets In Healthy Adult Male Volunteers Under Fed and Fasting Conditions [NCT00946608]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
A Phase I, Single-Center, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Topical CRx-197 Formulations in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00721331]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Combination Loratadine/Montelukast QD vs Pseudoephedrine and Placebo in the Treatment of Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis [NCT00319995]Phase 31,095 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-01Completed
Claritin® Tablet 10 mg, Claritin® RediTabs® 10 mg, Claritin® Dry Syrup 1% Drug Use Investigation (Pediatrics) [NCT00762983]1,003 participants (Actual)Observational2008-03-31Completed
Loratadine for Improvement of Bone Pain in Patients With Chronic Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Use [NCT03883386]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-24Terminated(stopped due to Poor enrollment)
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Grass (Phleum Pratense) Sublingual Tablet (SCH 697243) in Adult Subjects With a History of Grass Pollen Induced Rhinoconjunctivitis Wit [NCT00562159]Phase 3439 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Study of the Decongestant Effect of the Combination of Loratadine and Montelukast Compared With Placebo in SAR Subjects Exposed to Pollen in an Environmental Exposure Unit [NCT00423995]Phase 3379 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-01Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray With the Addition of Loratadine Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (Study No. C94-145) [NCT03855228]Phase 3704 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-03-01Completed
A Randomized, 24 Weeks, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Omalizumab in Adult Patients With Chronic Urticaria Who Exhibit IgE Against Thyroperoxidase [NCT00481676]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
A Phase 1, Exploratory, Randomized, Open-label, 2-Arm Study to Characterize the Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Alemtuzumab 12mg Administered Subcutaneously or Intravenously in Patients With Progressive Multiple Sclerosis [NCT02583594]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-06Completed
An Open Label, Balanced, Randomized, Two-Treatment, Two-Sequence, Two-Period, Single-Dose, Crossover, Bioavailability Study on Loratadine Formulations Comparing Loratadine 10 mg Orally Disintegrating Tablets of Ohm Laboratories, Inc. (A Subsidiary of Ranb [NCT00776217]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
[NCT02653339]180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-06-30Not yet recruiting
Comparative Study of Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Ginger Extract and Loratadine for Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis Patients (Clinical Trial Phase II) [NCT02576808]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel, Double-blind, Comparative Study of the Superiority of the FDC of Desloratadine 0.5 mg/mL and Prednisolone 4 mg/mL Versus Desloratadine 0.5 mg/mL in the Treat. of Persistent Allergic Rhinitis in Children [NCT05214911]Phase 3248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-03-30Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of The Effect of Loratadine Versus Diosmin/Hesperidin Combination on Vinca Alkaloids Induced Neuropathy [NCT05243706]Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-01Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study Evaluating the Pharmacodynamic Effect of a 6-week Treatment With Triamcinolone Acetonide Aqueous Nasal Spray 110 μg and 220 μg Once Daily on Basal Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adr [NCT01154153]Phase 4140 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Comparative, Randomized, Single-Dose, Fully Replicated, 4-Way Crossover Bioavailability Study of Ranbaxy and Schering (Claritin_D® 24 Hour) Loratadine 10mg /Pseudoephedrine Sulfate 240 mg Extended-Release Tablets, in Healthy Adult Volunteers Under Fasting [NCT00837915]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
A Phase II, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Antihistamines in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis (the ATEE Study) [NCT04248712]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-10Terminated(stopped due to low enrollment)
An Open Label, Balanced, Randomized, Two-Treatment, Two-Sequence, Two-Period, Single-Dose, Crossover, Bioavailability Study on Loratadine Formulations Comparing Loratadine 10 mg Orally Disintegrating Tablets of Ohm Laboratories, Inc. (A Subsidiary of Ranb [NCT00776282]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel Study Comparing the Efficacy of Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength to Claritin® Tablets 24-Hour in Reducing Ocular Itching in Subjects With Allergic Conjunctivitis [NCT05265910]Phase 458 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-14Completed
A Single-dose, Single-center, Randomized, Open-label, Two-way Crossover Study in Healthy Adults to Assess the Bioequivalence of Loratadine Oral Solution/Syrup 1mg/mL (GPLA Formula) Versus Claritin Peach Syrup 1mg/mL (ANNA Formula) [NCT02593747]Phase 154 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Loratadine-Betamethasone Oral Solution (1 mg/0.05 mg/1 mL) for Initial Treatment of Severe Perennial Allergic Rhinitis in School Age Children [NCT00963573]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled, Multi-Center Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Zyrtec® (Cetirizine HCl) Syrup vs. Claritin® (Loratadine) Syrup vs. Placebo in Treatment of Children With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) [NCT02932774]Phase 4683 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study of the 12 Month Effect of Treatment With Once Daily Triamcinolone Acetonide (NASACORT® AQ Nasal Spray 110 μg) on the Growth Velocity of Children, 3 to 9 Years of Age, With P [NCT00449072]Phase 4299 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Master Protocol of Two Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center, Parallel Group Studies to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Adult Patients With Chronic Pruritus of Unknown Origin (CPUO) [NCT05263206]Phase 3208 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-15Recruiting
Aprepitant vs. Desloratadine in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Related Pruritus: A Prospective, Randomized Control, Double-blinded, Phase II Clinical Trial [NCT02646020]Phase 2138 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
A Four-Way Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy and Speed of Azelastine Nasal Spray and Antihistaminic Agents in Adult Subjects With Allergen Induced Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis [NCT00561717]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Comparative, Randomized, Single-Dose, Fully Replicated, 4-Way Crossover Bioavailability Study of Ranbaxy and Schering (Claritin_D® 24 Hour) 10 mg Loratadine/240 mg Pseudoephedrine Sulfate Extended-Release Tablets, in Healthy Adult Volunteers Under Fed Con [NCT00845546]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
Pilot Efficacy and Safety Field Trial of Desloratadine Administered Concomitantly With Oxybutynin, in Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis and Post-Nasal Drip [NCT00816972]Phase 2540 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
"A Pilot, Multicenter, Double-blind Randomized Study for Comparison of Aerius® Continuous Treatment Versus Aerius® PRN Regimen on Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria Patient Quality of Life" [NCT00783354]Phase 4129 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-01Completed
A Single-Dose, Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Treatment, Four-Period, Crossover Study to Assess the Relative Bioavailability of Xisimin (Loratadine) Tablets Under Fasting and Fed Conditions in Healthy Subjects Compared to Clarityne Tablets [NCT03151720]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-01Completed
An Exploratory Phase IV, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Crossover Study to Compare the Effects of 5 mg vs. 20 mg Desloratadine on the Development of Experimentally Induced Urticaria Lesions [NCT00600847]Phase 433 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Influence of H1-antihistamines on the Dermal Blood Flow Response After a Histamine Skin Prick as Well as After the Topical Application of Cinnamaldehyde and Capsaicin [NCT04399525]12 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-28Completed
[NCT01055756]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Withdrawn
Comparison of the Efficacy of Gabapentin With Loratadine in the Treatment of Uremic Pruritus in Patients of Chronic Kidney Disease [NCT05750875]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-01Completed
A Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Study to Assess the Duration of the Suppressive Effects of Desloratadine on the Cutaneous Allergen-induced Wheal and Flare (1) Response After Discontinuation [NCT00359138]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of MK-3641, a Ragweed (Ambrosia Artemisiifolia) Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablet, in Children With a History of Ragweed-Induced Rhinoconjunctivitis With or Without [NCT02478398]Phase 31,025 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-20Completed
Effect of Iron Repletion in Women With Chronic Cough and Iron Deficiency [NCT01507792]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
The Efficacy of Claritin in Healthy Subjects [NCT01451996]Phase 4340 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
A Double-Blind, Parallel, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial to Evaluate Onset of Action of Loratadine and Fexofenadine in Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis in a Pollen Challenge Chamber [NCT01469234]Phase 4255 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Loratadine for the Prevention of Bone Pain Caused by Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) During Stem Cell Mobilization [NCT05421416]Phase 278 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Not yet recruiting
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Immunotherapy With SCH 697243 (Phleum Pratense) in Children 5 to <18 Years of Age With a History of Grass Pollen Induced Rhinoconjunctivi [NCT00550550]Phase 3345 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Single-Dose, Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Treatment, Four-Period, Crossover Study to Assess the Bioequivalence of Xisimin (Loratadine) Tablets Under Fasting and Fed Conditions in Healthy Subjects Compared With Clarityne Tablets [NCT03196531]Phase 1108 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-07Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial of Infliximab (Remicade®) Induction Therapy for Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients (CTOT-19) [NCT02495077]Phase 2290 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-02Completed
Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study of Loratadine for Pegfilgrastim Induced Bone Pain in Patients With Aggressive Lymphoma [NCT02392039]Early Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-14Terminated(stopped due to Slow Accrual)
A Two-Part, Phase I Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Comparator Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of MK-8808 and to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of MK-8808 With EU-approved MabThera® and US-licensed [NCT01390441]Phase 1100 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated early by the Sponsor for business reasons.)
A One-year Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the House Dust Mite Sublingual Allergen Immunotherapy Tablet (SCH 900237/MK 8237) in Children and Adult Subjects With House Dust Mite-Induced Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis W [NCT01700192]Phase 31,482 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Phenylephrine HCl 30 mg Extended-Release Tablets on Nasal Congestion in Subjects With Allergic Rhinitis [NCT01413958]Phase 3575 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study to Evaluate Objective Changes in Nasal Airflow of Loratadine/Pseudoephedrine Tablet and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray in Subjects Following Allergen Exposure in an Environmental Exposure Unit [NCT03443843]Phase 482 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-21Completed
A Randomized, Crossover Manufacturing Transfer Study Comparing the Bioequivalence of a Single Oral Dose of Claritin-D® 12-Hour Extended Release Tablet (Loratadine 5mg/Pseudoephedrine Sulfate 120 mg, Manufacturer-SAG) to a Single Oral Dose of Claritin-D® 1 [NCT03517943]Phase 129 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-24Completed
Evaluation of Loratadine for Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor Induced Bone Pain in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies [NCT02305979]61 participants (Actual)Observational2014-12-31Completed
Potential Therapeutic Outcome of Combined Antihistaminics Therapy in COVID 19 Patients [NCT05043350]Phase 2/Phase 3214 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-13Completed
A Single Center, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Two Factor Patient-Experience Management Study of ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid Injection) for the Reduction of Localized Subcutaneous Fat in the Submental Area [NCT02007434]Phase 384 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Montelukast + Loratadine vs. Montelukast for the Control of Mild to Moderate Persistent Asthma in Children: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT03372473]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-10Completed
Randomized, Phase 2 Study to Estimate the Effect of Prophylactic Intervention With Naproxen or Loratadine on Bone Pain in Breast Cancer Subjects Receiving Chemotherapy and Pegfilgrastim [NCT01712009]Phase 2600 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-01Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00359138 (1) [back to overview]Duration of Suppressive Effect of Desloratadine After Discontinuation of a 1-week Treatment
NCT00449072 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
NCT00449072 (10) [back to overview]24 Hour Urinary Free Cortisol Levels
NCT00449072 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Four Individual Nasal Symptom Scores at the End of Treatment
NCT00449072 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS)
NCT00449072 (10) [back to overview]Growth Velocity
NCT00449072 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Days Participants Used the Rescue Medication During the Double-blind Treatment Phase of the Study
NCT00449072 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Used the Rescue Medication During the Double-blind Phase of the Study
NCT00449072 (10) [back to overview]Global Efficacy as Assessed by the Participant (With the Help of a Parent/Guardian/Caregiver) During and at the End of the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT00449072 (10) [back to overview]Global Efficacy as Assessed by the Investigator During and at the End of the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT00449072 (10) [back to overview]24 Hour Cortisol/Creatinine Ratio
NCT00481676 (9) [back to overview]Change in the Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 24)
NCT00481676 (9) [back to overview]Standardized (With Respect to Length of Time) Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 24)
NCT00481676 (9) [back to overview]Investigator's Global Assessment of the Patient's Chronic Urticaria Symptoms
NCT00481676 (9) [back to overview]Change in Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life (CU-Q2oL) Scores From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 24)
NCT00481676 (9) [back to overview]Change in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 24)
NCT00481676 (9) [back to overview]Change in the Skindex Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 24)
NCT00481676 (9) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Wheals, Erythemas, Pruritus, and Angioedemas at the End of the Study
NCT00481676 (9) [back to overview]Patient's Global Assessment of Their Chronic Urticaria Symptoms
NCT00481676 (9) [back to overview]Use of Concomitant and Rescue Medications
NCT00536380 (1) [back to overview]Change in the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) From Baseline to the Final Week for Desloratadine 5 mg Versus Desloratadine 20 mg
NCT00550550 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) Over the Entire GPS
NCT00550550 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Weekly Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total Score Over the Entire GPS
NCT00550550 (4) [back to overview]Participant Total Combined Symptom (TCS) Score Over the Entire Grass Pollen Season (GPS)
NCT00550550 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Scores (DSS) Over the Entire GPS
NCT00562159 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS) Over the Entire GPS
NCT00562159 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) Over the Entire GPS
NCT00562159 (4) [back to overview]Participant Average Weekly Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (RQLQ(S)) Total Score Over the Entire GPS
NCT00562159 (4) [back to overview]Participant Total Combined Symptom (TCS) Score Over the Entire Grass Pollen Season (GPS)
NCT00730912 (2) [back to overview]Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve (AUC) of SCH 29851 (Unchanged Drug), SCH 34117 (Active Metabolite), and SCH 45581 (3OH-SCH 34117)
NCT00730912 (2) [back to overview]Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of SCH 29851 (Unchanged Drug; Loratadine), SCH 34117 (Active Metabolite), and SCH 45581 (3OH-SCH 34117)
NCT00960141 (6) [back to overview]Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis
NCT00960141 (6) [back to overview]Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis
NCT00960141 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score
NCT00960141 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score
NCT00960141 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score
NCT00960141 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score
NCT00963469 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period
NCT00963469 (7) [back to overview]Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00963469 (7) [back to overview]Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00963469 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period
NCT00963469 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period
NCT00963469 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period
NCT00963469 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Composite Symptoms Score (Daytime Nasal and Nighttime Symptoms) Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period
NCT00963599 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Itching Score
NCT00963599 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score
NCT00963599 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Rhinorrhea Score
NCT00963599 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Sneezing Score
NCT00963599 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening
NCT00963599 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score
NCT00963599 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score
NCT00963599 (12) [back to overview]Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis
NCT00963599 (12) [back to overview]Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis
NCT00963599 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score
NCT00963599 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Composite Symptoms Score (Daytime Nasal and Nighttime Symptoms)
NCT00963599 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Congestion Score
NCT00972738 (6) [back to overview]Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment Period
NCT00972738 (6) [back to overview]Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment Period
NCT00972738 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period
NCT00972738 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period
NCT00972738 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period
NCT00972738 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After the 2-week Treatment Period
NCT00979901 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Overall Score at Week 2
NCT00979901 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over 2 Weeks
NCT00979901 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over 2 Weeks
NCT00979901 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over 2 Weeks
NCT00979901 (6) [back to overview]Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at Week 2
NCT00979901 (6) [back to overview]Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at Week 2
NCT01154153 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants by Relief Level as Evaluated by the Participant
NCT01154153 (6) [back to overview]Ratio of Serum Cortisol Area Under Curve [AUC(0-24 hr)] at the End of Treatment to Baseline
NCT01154153 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants by Relief Level as Evaluated by the Physician
NCT01154153 (6) [back to overview]The Percent of Days of Rescue Medication Use During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
NCT01154153 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)
NCT01154153 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Using Rescue Medication
NCT01330017 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline for the Instantaneous Nasal Symptom Assessment Score at Day 7
NCT01330017 (8) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Evening (p.m.) Symptom Score for the Nasal Reflective Symptom Assessment by Study Day of the Treatment Period
NCT01330017 (8) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in the Daily Reflective Nasal Congestion Score
NCT01330017 (8) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Morning (a.m.) Symptom Score for the Nasal Reflective Symptom Assessment by Study Day of the Treatment Period
NCT01330017 (8) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline for the Daily Reflective Nasal Symptom Assessment Score by Study Day of the Treatment Period
NCT01330017 (8) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline for the Instantaneous Nasal Symptom Assessment Score By Study Day of the Treatment Period
NCT01330017 (8) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the a.m. Symptom Score for the Instantaneous Nasal Symptom Assessment by Study Day of the Treatment Period
NCT01330017 (8) [back to overview]Time to Maximal Effect
NCT01390441 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to Adverse Events
NCT01390441 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event
NCT01390441 (7) [back to overview]Part A: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) After the Second Infusion of a Single Course of Treatment
NCT01390441 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in 28 Joints C-Reactive Protein Score (DAS28-CRP) by Time-point
NCT01390441 (7) [back to overview]Part A: Number of ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 Responders at Week 24
NCT01390441 (7) [back to overview]Part B: Number of ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 Responders at Week 24
NCT01390441 (7) [back to overview]Part A: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Day 0 to Day 84 (AUC0-84day) After a Single Course of Treatment
NCT01413958 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline for the Morning Instantaneous Symptom Assessment Scores for Each Day During the Treatment Period
NCT01413958 (14) [back to overview]Time to Maximal Phenylephrine Effect
NCT01413958 (14) [back to overview]Day 7 Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Instantaneous Symptom Assessment Score
NCT01413958 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline for the Evening Instantaneous Symptom Assessment Scores for Each Day During the Treatment Period.
NCT01413958 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline for the Evening Reflective Symptom Assessment Scores for Each Day During the Treatment Period
NCT01413958 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline for the Morning Reflective Symptom Assessment Scores for Each Day During the Treatment Period.
NCT01413958 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Instantaneous Symptom Assessment Score
NCT01413958 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Instantaneous Symptom Assessment Score Per Day
NCT01413958 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Reflective Nasal Congestion Score
NCT01413958 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Reflective Nasal Congestion Score Per Day
NCT01413958 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Morning Predose Instantaneous Nasal Congestion Symptom Score
NCT01413958 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Evening Reflective Symptom Assessment Score
NCT01413958 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Morning Reflective Symptom Assessment Score
NCT01413958 (14) [back to overview]Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (RQLQ)
NCT01451996 (2) [back to overview]Change in Wheal Reaction Area From Baseline --- 2 Hour
NCT01451996 (2) [back to overview]Change in Wheal Reaction Area From Baseline --- 1 Hour
NCT01469234 (8) [back to overview]Mean Individual Symptom Scores for Itchy Eyes by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point
NCT01469234 (8) [back to overview]Mean Individual Symptom Score for Runny Nose by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point
NCT01469234 (8) [back to overview]Mean Individual Symptom Score for Itchy Nose by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point
NCT01469234 (8) [back to overview]Mean Individual Symptom Scores for Itchy Mouth/Throat/Ears by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point
NCT01469234 (8) [back to overview]Mean Individual Symptom Scores for Nasal Congestion by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point
NCT01469234 (8) [back to overview]Mean Individual Symptom Scores for Sneezing by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point
NCT01469234 (8) [back to overview]Mean Individual Symptom Scores for Watery Eyes by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point
NCT01469234 (8) [back to overview]Mean Major Symptom Complex (MSC) Score by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point (From 180 Minutes to 300 Minutes)
NCT01673620 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event (AE)
NCT01673620 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to AEs
NCT01700192 (7) [back to overview]Average Total Combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Score (TCS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01700192 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AE
NCT01700192 (7) [back to overview]Average Rhinitis Daily Medication Score (Rhinitis DMS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01700192 (7) [back to overview]Average Rhinitis Daily Symptom Score (Rhinitis DSS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01700192 (7) [back to overview]Average Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptoms Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01700192 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience At Least One Adverse Event (AE)
NCT01700192 (7) [back to overview]Average Total Combined Rhinitis Score (TCRS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment
NCT01712009 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Severe Bone Pain by Cycle and Across Cycles
NCT01712009 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Bone Pain (All Grades) in Cycle 1
NCT01712009 (7) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Patient-reported Bone Pain
NCT01712009 (7) [back to overview]Maximum Patient-reported Bone Pain by Cycle and Across Cycles
NCT01712009 (7) [back to overview]Mean Patient-reported Bone Pain by Cycle and Across Cycles
NCT01712009 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01712009 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Bone Pain (All Grades) by Cycle (2-4) and Across Cycles
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Submental Skin Laxity Grades (SMSLG)
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Bruising Grading Scale Scores
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS)
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale Scores
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS)
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Subject Self Rating Scale (SSRS)
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Submental Fat Thickness
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Induration Grading Scale Scores
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Swelling Grading Scale Scores
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pain Assessment Using McGill Pain Questionnaire
NCT02007434 (11) [back to overview]Patient Experience Questions
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Pre-specified Local Application Site Reactions
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Anaphylaxis and/or Systemic Allergic Reactions
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Treated With Epinephrine
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Peak Ragweed Season (RS)
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Average TCS During the Entire RS
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Average Rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DSS During the Peak RS
NCT02478398 (7) [back to overview]Average Rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DMS During the Peak RS
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR)
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR).
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection AMR or Suspicious for AMR
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection AMR or Suspicious for AMR.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR)
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR) or Borderline Rejection
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR) or Borderline Rejection.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR).
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With BK Viremia That Require a Change in Immunosuppression or Anti-viral Treatment as Per Standard of Care at the Site.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With CMV Viremia That Require a Change in Immunosuppression or Anti-viral Treatment as Per Standard of Care at the Site
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With de Novo DSA.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Death or Graft Failure.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Impaired Wound Healing Manifested by Wound Dehiscence, Wound Infection, or Hernia at the Site of the Transplant Incision
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Locally Treated Rejection, Defined as Treatment Administered for Rejection Based on Clinical Signs or Biopsy Findings.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Locally Treated Rejection, Defined as Treatment Administered for Rejection Based on Clinical Signs or Biopsy Findings.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Malignancy.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Mycobacterial or Fungal Infections
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Only Graft Failure.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]The Difference Between the Mean eGFR (Modified MDRD) in the Experimental vs. Control Groups.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants Who Need Dialysis After Week 1.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants Whose Day 2 Serum CRR Was Less Than 30%.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants Whose Day 5 Serum CRR Was Less Than 70%.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants With a Serum Creatinine of More Than 3 mg/dL.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Immediately After Surgery) in Serum Creatinine.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]eGFR Values as Measured by CKD-EPI
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]eGFR Values as Measured by MDRD
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Primary Non-Function (PNF), Defined as Dialysis-dependency for More Than 3 Months.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between 3 Months and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between 3 Months and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between 6 Months and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between 6 Months and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between Post-transplant Nadir and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between Post-transplant Nadir and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Creatinine Reduction Ratio (CRR), Defined as the First Creatinine on Day 2 Divided by he First Creatinine After Surgery
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Creatinine Reduction Ratio (CRR), Defined as the First Creatinine on Day 5 Divided by the First Creatinine After Surgery.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Days From Transplantation Until Event (ACR, AMR, or Hospitalization for Infection and/or Malignancy)
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Duration of Delayed Graft Function (DGF), Defined as Time From Transplantation to the Last Required Dialysis Treatment.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]eGFR Values as Measured by CKD-EPI
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]eGFR Values as Measured by MDRD
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Number of Dialysis Sessions.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants That Required at Least One Dialysis Treatment.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Any Infection Requiring Hospitalization or Resulting in Death.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With BANFF Chronicity Scores > or Equal 2 on the 24 Month Biopsy.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]BANFF Grades of First AMR.
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Symptom Score on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (Assessed by Participant)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (Assessed by Participant)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Response to Therapy on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Response to Therapy on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT03855228 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Symptom Score on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)
NCT04162795 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Agreement of the Great Taste of the Product
NCT04162795 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Agreement of the Enjoyable Product Experience
NCT04162795 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Soothing Feeling on the Throat
NCT04162795 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Cooling Sensation
NCT04162795 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Liking the Flavor Sensation of the Product
NCT04162795 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Cooling Sensation Per Location
NCT04162795 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Refreshing Sensation
NCT04162795 (11) [back to overview]Time to Perception of Cooling Sensation
NCT04162795 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Cooling Sensation
NCT04162795 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Agreement of the Unique Sensory Experience for an Allergy Medicine
NCT04162795 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Agreement of the Refreshing of the Cooling Sensation
NCT04179461 (4) [back to overview]Pulmonary Function Measured by Spirometry: Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) / Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
NCT04179461 (4) [back to overview]Change in Composite Asthma Severity Index (CASI)
NCT04179461 (4) [back to overview]Asthma Control Test (ACT)
NCT04179461 (4) [back to overview]Adherence of Asthma Controller Medication
NCT04248712 (2) [back to overview]Change in Maximum Eosinophil Count
NCT04248712 (2) [back to overview]Adverse Events

Duration of Suppressive Effect of Desloratadine After Discontinuation of a 1-week Treatment

The number of days after treatment discontinuation until a measurable wheal and flare response. (NCT00359138)
Timeframe: Starting at Day 8

InterventionDays (Mean)
Desloratadine 5 mg Tablet + Levocetirizine Placebo Capsule5
Desloratadine Placebo Tablet + Levocetirizine 5 mg Capsule4
Desloratadine Placebo Tablet + Levocetirizine Placebo CapsuleNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

"Adverse events that developed, worsened, or became serious during the double-blind treatment period or within 7 days after the last dose of double-blind investigational product (IP) are defined as TEAEs.~A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose:~Resulted in death~Was life-threatening~Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization~Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity~Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect~Was a medically important event" (NCT00449072)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to 7 days following end of treatment (Day 360)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
with any TEAEwith any treatment emergent SAEwith any TEAE leading to permanent discontinuationwith any TEAE leading to deathwith investigational product (IP) overdose TEAE
Placebo1130300
TAA-AQ1172100

[back to top]

24 Hour Urinary Free Cortisol Levels

Urine cortisol levels was determined at screening, at the end of treatment, and at follow-up visit using routine laboratory testing. The normal range for urinary free cortisol for 3- to 9-year-olds was considered to be [1.4 - 21 μg/24 hours]. (NCT00449072)
Timeframe: Baseline (2 to 6 weeks before Day 1), end of treatment (Day 360), and at follow-up (Day 420)

,
Interventionμg/24 hours (Mean)
at baseline (N=146, N=141)at end of treatment (EOT) (N=114, N=118)at follow-up (N=96, N=97)
Placebo7.447.057.85
TAA-AQ7.447.427.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Four Individual Nasal Symptom Scores at the End of Treatment

"PAR symptoms - nasal stuffiness, nasal discharge, sneezing, and nasal itching were scored upon arising in the morning according to the following 4-point scale:~0 = symptom absent~1 = mild (present but not annoying to self)~2 = moderate (annoying to self but not interfering with sleep or daily living)~3 = severe (interfered with daily living and/or sleep)~Individual symptom scores ranged from 0 (best outcome) to 3 (worst outcome). A negative value for change represents an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00449072)
Timeframe: For 7 days prior to randomization (Baseline) and everyday for 7 days prior to Day 360 (end of treatment)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change in Nasal stuffiness (N=101, N=104)Change in Nasal discharge (N=102, N=103)Change in Sneezing (N=102, N=103)Change in Nasal Itching (N=101, N=104)
Placebo-0.68-0.67-0.64-0.69
TAA-AQ-0.83-0.71-0.55-0.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS)

"PAR symptoms - nasal stuffiness, nasal discharge, sneezing, and nasal itching were scored upon arising in the morning according to the following 4-point scale:~0 = symptom absent~1 = mild (present but not annoying to self)~2 = moderate (annoying to self but not interfering with sleep or daily living)~3 = severe (interfered with daily living and/or sleep)~TNSS was the sum of the individual symptom scores (ranging 0-3), and TNSS ranged from 0 (best outcome) to 12 (worst outcome). A negative value for change represents an improvement in symptoms." (NCT00449072)
Timeframe: For 7 days prior to randomization (Baseline) and everyday for 7 days prior to Day 360 (end of treatment)

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.68
TAA-AQ-2.80

[back to top]

Growth Velocity

"Individual participant's growth velocity over double-blind treatment period was calculated using a linear regression of height over time.~Height was measured on the same wall-mounted Harpenden stadiometer with the participant barefoot and in light clothing." (NCT00449072)
Timeframe: Day 1 to end of treatment (Day 360)

Interventioncm/year (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo6.09
TAA-AQ5.65

[back to top]

Percentage of Days Participants Used the Rescue Medication During the Double-blind Treatment Phase of the Study

"Children's Claritin® syrup was provided as a rescue medication to control allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms and could be used throughout the study on an as needed basis. Use of rescue medication was to be documented in the participant's diary.~The percentage of days that participants used the rescue medication during the double-blind treatment phase of the study." (NCT00449072)
Timeframe: double-blind treatment period (Day 1 to Day 360)

Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Placebo20.39
TAA-AQ15.69

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Used the Rescue Medication During the Double-blind Phase of the Study

"Children's Claritin® syrup was provided as a rescue medication to control allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms and could be used throughout the study on an as needed basis. Use of rescue medication was to be documented in the participant's diary.~The percentage of participants who used the rescue medication during each of the study periods is reported." (NCT00449072)
Timeframe: Baseline (4-6 months before Day 1), double-blind treatment period (Day 1 to Day 360) and follow-up (Day 361 to Day 420)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo81.2
TAA-AQ90.3

[back to top]

Global Efficacy as Assessed by the Participant (With the Help of a Parent/Guardian/Caregiver) During and at the End of the Double-blind Treatment Period

"Global efficacy was assessed by the participant (with the help of a parent/guardian/caregiver) using the following scale:~0 = no relief (symptoms unchanged or worse than before)~1 = slight relief (symptoms were present and only minimally improved)~2 = moderate relief (symptoms were present and could have been troublesome but were noticeably improved)~3 = marked relief (symptoms were greatly improved and although present were scarcely troublesome)~4 = complete relief (virtually no symptom present)" (NCT00449072)
Timeframe: Day 120, Day 240 and Day 360

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Day 120 (N=127, N=131)Day 240 (N=115, N=116)Day 360 (N=125, N=125)
Placebo1.871.971.86
TAA-AQ2.092.162.18

[back to top]

Global Efficacy as Assessed by the Investigator During and at the End of the Double-blind Treatment Period

"Global efficacy was assessed by the investigator using the following scale:~0 = no relief (symptoms unchanged or worse than before)~1 = slight relief (symptoms were present and only minimally improved)~2 = moderate relief (symptoms were present and could have been troublesome but were noticeably improved)~3 = marked relief (symptoms were greatly improved and although present were scarcely troublesome)~4 = complete relief (virtually no symptom present)" (NCT00449072)
Timeframe: Day 120, Day 240 and Day 360

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Day 120 (N=128, N=130)Day 240 (N=115, N=136)Day 360 (N=125, N=125)
Placebo1.892.111.80
TAA-AQ2.042.212.14

[back to top]

24 Hour Cortisol/Creatinine Ratio

Urine cortisol and creatinine levels were determined at screening, at the end of treatment, and at follow-up visit using routine laboratory testing. The normal range for urinary free cortisol for 3- to 9-year-olds was considered to be [1.4 - 21 μg/24 hours]. No normal range is available for cortisol/creatinine ratio. (NCT00449072)
Timeframe: Baseline (2 to 6 weeks before Day 1), end of treatment (Day 360), and at follow-up (Day 420)

,
Interventionμg/g Creatinine (Mean)
at baseline (N=145, N=141)at end of treatment (N=114, N=118)at follow-up (N=96, N=97)
Placebo18.9415.4717.01
TAA-AQ19.4415.8615.10

[back to top]

Change in the Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 24)

The UAS is a composite diary-recorded score with numeric severity ratings (0=none to 3=intense) for the number of wheals per 24 hours and the intensity of the pruritus. The total daily score (sum of the wheal and pruritus scores) ranges from 0 to 6. Because of variations in chronic urticaria disease intensity, assessment of disease activity was based on a weekly (7 days) UAS score called UAS7, that is, the sum of the daily UASs, ranging from 0 to 42 per week. A higher score indicates worse disease. A negative change score (Week 24 score minus Baseline score) indicates improvement. (NCT00481676)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of the study (Week 24)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Omalizumab 75-375 mg-17.8
Placebo to Omalizumab-5.8

[back to top]

Standardized (With Respect to Length of Time) Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 24)

The UAS is a composite diary-recorded score with numeric severity ratings (0=none to 3=intense) for the number of wheals per 24 hours and the intensity of the pruritus. The total daily score (sum of the wheal and pruritus scores) ranges from 0 to 6. A higher score indicates worse disease. AUC was calculated from daily UASs where no urticaria medication was taken using the trapezoidal rule. The standardized AUC UAS was calculated as the sum of trapezoids divided by the length of time. (NCT00481676)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of the study (Week 24)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Omalizumab 75-375 mg1.0
Placebo to Omalizumab2.5

[back to top]

Investigator's Global Assessment of the Patient's Chronic Urticaria Symptoms

The investigator made a global assessment of the patient's chronic urticaria symptoms on a 4-point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe) at Baseline and again at the end of the study. The number of patients in each category is reported. (NCT00481676)
Timeframe: At Baseline and at the end of the study (Week 24)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline: MissingBaseline: NoneBaseline: MildBaseline: ModerateBaseline: SevereWeek 24: MissingWeek 24: NoneWeek 24: MildWeek 24: ModerateWeek 24: Severe
Omalizumab 75-375 mg117135018612
Placebo to Omalizumab0096711947

[back to top]

Change in Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life (CU-Q2oL) Scores From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 24)

The CU-Q2oL (German version) is a questionnaire that measures the relative burden of chronic urticaria on subjective well-being. It has 23 questions in 3 domains (symptoms, general impairment, difficulties and problems due to urticaria). Patients are asked to respond how much they are troubled by each problem on a 5-point Likert scale (1=not at all to 5=very much). Each domain and the overall (total) scores are normalized to a scale of 1 to 100. A higher score indicates lower QoL. A negative change score (Week 24 score minus Baseline score) indicates improvement. (NCT00481676)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of the study (Week 24)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline : Limits Looks (N=27,21)Baseline : Swelling/eating (N=27,22)Baseline : Sleep (N=27,22)Baseline : Mental status (N=27,22)Baseline : Functioning (N=27,22)Baseline : Itching/embarrassment (N=27,22)Baseline : Total score (N=27,22)Week 24 : Limits looks (N=27,21)Week 24 : Swelling/eating (N=27,21)Week 24 : Sleep (N=27,21)Week 24 : Mental status (N=27,21)Week 24 : Functioning (N=27,21)Week 24 : Itching/embarrassment (N=27,21)Week 24 : Total score (N=27,21)Week 24 - Baseline: Limits looks (N=27,20)Week 24 - Baseline: Swelling/eating (N=27,21)Week 24 - Baseline: Sleep (N=27,21)Week 24 - Baseline: Mental status (N=27,21)Week 24 - Baseline: Functioning (N=27,21)Week 24 - Baseline: itching/embarrassmen (N=27,21)Week 24 - Baseline: Total score (N=27,21)
Omalizumab 75-375 mg31.521.845.842.636.058.139.517.110.427.325.911.922.918.5-14.4-11.3-18.5-16.7-24.1-35.2-21.0
Placebo to Omalizumab34.526.746.642.430.756.838.923.227.447.340.127.057.437.3-9.4-0.6-0.6-2.4-3.8-0.9-2.3

[back to top]

Change in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 24)

The DLQI is a dermatology-specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire designed for use in patients over 16 years of age. Patients are asked to respond to each of 10 questions on a 4-point Likert scale in regard to how much their skin problem has affected their life over the last week (0=not at all, 1=a little, 2=a lot, 3=very much). The overall (total) DLQI score (range=0 to 30) is calculated by summing the scores of all 10 questions. The higher the score, the more QoL is impaired. A negative change score (Week 24 score minus Baseline score) indicates improvement. (NCT00481676)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of the study (Week 24)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (N=27, 22)Week 24 (N=27,21)Week 24 minus Baseline (N=27,21)
Omalizumab 75-375 mg10.13.7-6.3
Placebo to Omalizumab9.88.1-1.5

[back to top]

Change in the Skindex Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 24)

Skindex is a 30-item questionnaire with 3 scores (functioning, emotions,symptoms) and a composite score (average scale score) that assesses the effects of skin disease on patients' quality of life (QoL). Item responses are standardized on a scale from 0 to 100. The mean of all 61 items was calculated. A higher score indicates a lower QoL. A negative change score (Week 24 score minus Baseline score) indicates improvement. (NCT00481676)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of the study (Week 24)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (N=27,22)Week 24 (N=27,21)Week 24 minus Baseline (N=27,21)
Omalizumab 75-375 mg1.80.9-0.9
Placebo to Omalizumab1.61.5-0.1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Wheals, Erythemas, Pruritus, and Angioedemas at the End of the Study

Patients kept a daily diary of the number of wheals and erythema and the severity of pruritus and angioedemas during the study. (NCT00481676)
Timeframe: At the end of the study (Week 24)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Wheals - NoneWheals - < 10Wheals - 10-50Wheals - > 50Erythemas - NoneErythemas - < 10Erythemas - 10-50Erythemas - > 50Pruritus - NonePruritus - MildPruritus - ModeratePruritus - SevereAngioedema - NoneAngioedema - MildAngioedema - ModerateAngioedema - Severe
Omalizumab 75-375 mg19311184111643121102
Placebo to Omalizumab11131474128338611

[back to top]

Patient's Global Assessment of Their Chronic Urticaria Symptoms

Patients made a global assessment of their chronic urticaria symptoms on a 4-point Likert scale (none, mild moderate, severe) at Baseline and again at the end of the study. The number of patients in each category is reported. (NCT00481676)
Timeframe: At Baseline and at the end of the study (Week 24)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline: MissingBaseline: No complaintsBaseline: Moderate complaintsBaseline: Severe complaintsBaseline: Maximum complaintsWeek 24: MissingWeek 24: No complaintsWeek 24: Moderate complaintsWeek 24: Severe complaintsWeek 24: Maximum complaints
Omalizumab 75-375 mg0313110116631
Placebo to Omalizumab00138113792

[back to top]

Use of Concomitant and Rescue Medications

Data was collected from the patients' diaries about the number of clemastine and loratadine pills taken during the last 7 days of each month of the study. (NCT00481676)
Timeframe: At Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

,
InterventionPills (Mean)
Week 4 - clemastine (N=27,21)Week 4 - loratadine (N=27,22)Week 8 - clemastine (N=26,20)Week 8 - loratadine (N=26,21)Week 12 - clemastine (N=25,17)Week 12 - loratadine (N=25,19)Week 16 - clemastine (N=24,16)Week 16 - loratadine (N=24,17)Week 20 - clemastine (N=24,16)Week 20 - loratadine (N=24,17)Week 24 - clemastine (N=23,14)Week 24 - clemastine (N=23,16)
Omalizumab 75-375 mg0.71.31.31.21.11.20.20.60.90.50.70.3
Placebo to Omalizumab3.74.22.44.21.83.31.43.62.24.61.43.3

[back to top]

Change in the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) From Baseline to the Final Week for Desloratadine 5 mg Versus Desloratadine 20 mg

"The UAS is a composite diary-recorded score. The diary recorded scores included wheal score and pruritus score with numeric severity intensity ratings of 0 = none to 3 = intense. The scoring was to be done twice daily within one hour of arising and in the evening, approximately 12 hours later. Scoring was reflective, covering the 12-hour period since the previous recording. The daily UAS is the average of the morning and evening scores. The final week by definition was the terminal week. It was the last week participants stayed for the treatment period." (NCT00536380)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 treatment weeks

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline in UASBaseline UAS (mean +/- standard deviation)
10-mg Desloratadine-1.12.9
20-mg Desloratadine-1.02.8
5-mg Desloratadine-1.02.9

[back to top]

Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) Over the Entire GPS

The DMS is composed of a sum of the scores associated with rescue medication use per day. Rescue medications were implemented when a participant had a symptom score >= 4. Rescue medications for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were to be utilized in a step-wise fashion: loratadine, olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% opthalmic solution, mometasone, and prednisone, in that sequence. The score for the DMS ranged from 0 (no use of rescue medication) to 36 (maximum use of rescue medication). A lower medication score indicated less impact on symptoms and was suggestive of less use of rescue medication. (NCT00550550)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to the End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972430.91
Placebo1.33

[back to top]

Participant Average Weekly Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total Score Over the Entire GPS

The RQLQ has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0 (best) to 6 (worst), with a higher score indicating more significant impairment. (NCT00550550)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to the End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972431.45
Placebo1.77

[back to top]

Participant Total Combined Symptom (TCS) Score Over the Entire Grass Pollen Season (GPS)

The TCS is the sum of the rhinoconjunctivitis daily symptom score (DSS) and rhinoconjunctivitis daily medication score (DMS) averaged over the entire GPS. The TCS ranged from 0 (no symptoms and no rescue medication use) to 54 (most severe symptoms and maximum use of rescue medication), with increasing score indicating a higher level of symptom severity. The DSS is composed of 6 rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms with scores from 0 (best) to 18 (worst), with increasing score indicating increased severity. The DMS is composed of a sum of the scores associated with rescue medication use per day. The range for the DMS was 0 (no rescue medication use) to 36 (maximum use of rescue medication), with a lower score indicating less use of rescue medication. (NCT00550550)
Timeframe: From the Start of the GPS to the End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972434.62
Placebo6.25

[back to top]

Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Scores (DSS) Over the Entire GPS

The DSS is composed of six rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms which were recorded daily including runny nose, blocked nose, sneezing, itchy nose, gritty feeling/red/itchy, and watery eyes, and the symptoms were measured on a scale of 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptoms). A higher score indicated a higher level of symptoms and the total daily score could range from 0 (best) to 18 (worst). (NCT00550550)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to the End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972433.71
Placebo4.91

[back to top]

Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS) Over the Entire GPS

The DSS is composed of six rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms which were recorded daily including runny nose, blocked nose, sneezing, itchy nose, gritty feeling/red/itchy, and watery eyes, and the symptoms were measured on a scale of 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptoms). A higher score indicated a higher level of symptoms and the total daily score could range from 0 to 18. (NCT00562159)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972433.83
Placebo4.69

[back to top]

Participant Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) Over the Entire GPS

The DMS is composed of a sum of the scores associated with rescue medication use per day. Rescue medications were implemented when a participant had a symptom score >= 4. Rescue medications for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were to be utilized in a step-wise fashion: loratadine, olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% opthalmic solution, mometasone, and prednisone, in that sequence. The score for the DMS ranged from 0-36. A lower medication score indicated less impact on symptomology and was suggestive of less use of rescue medication. (NCT00562159)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972431.25
Placebo1.70

[back to top]

Participant Average Weekly Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (RQLQ(S)) Total Score Over the Entire GPS

The RQLQ(s) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment. (NCT00562159)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972431.30
Placebo1.57

[back to top]

Participant Total Combined Symptom (TCS) Score Over the Entire Grass Pollen Season (GPS)

The TCS is the sum of the rhinoconjunctivitis daily symptom score (DSS) and rhinoconjunctivitis daily medication score (DMS) averaged over the entire GPS. The TCS ranged from 0-54, with increasing score indicating a higher level of symptom severity. The DSS is composed of 6 rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms with scores from 0-18, with increasing score indicating increased severity. The DMS is composed of a sum of the scores associated with rescue medication use per day. The range for the DMS was 0-36, with a lower score indicating less use of rescue medication. (NCT00562159)
Timeframe: Start of the GPS to End of the GPS

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
SCH 6972435.08
Placebo6.39

[back to top]

Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve (AUC) of SCH 29851 (Unchanged Drug), SCH 34117 (Active Metabolite), and SCH 45581 (3OH-SCH 34117)

SCH 29851: Two-compartment model used as basic pharmacokinetic (PK) model. Individual AUC estimated with basic PPK parameters (apparent total body clearance (CL/F), apparent distribution volumes of central compartment (Vc/F) and peripheral compartment (Vp/F), apparent inter-compartmental clearance (Q/F), absorption rate constant (Ka), lag time, inter- and intra-individual variation) by Bayesian method. SCH 34117/SCH 45581: One-compartment model used as basic PK model. Individual AUC was estimated with PPK parameters (above) on final model by Bayesian method. (NCT00730912)
Timeframe: After 2 and 4 weeks of treatment, and after 1 and 3 weeks of treatment if participant agreed

,,
Interventionng•hr/mL (Mean)
SCH 29851SCH 34117SCH 45581
Adults 16 to 64 Years34.6868.0140.75
Pediatrics 3 to 6 Years16.7752.3341.54
Pediatrics 7 to 15 Years26.1359.5242.28

[back to top]

Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of SCH 29851 (Unchanged Drug; Loratadine), SCH 34117 (Active Metabolite), and SCH 45581 (3OH-SCH 34117)

SCH 29851: Two-compartment model used as basic pharmacokinetic (PK) model. Individual Cmax estimated with basic PPK parameters (apparent total body clearance (CL/F), apparent distribution volumes of central compartment (Vc/F) and peripheral compartment (Vp/F), apparent inter-compartmental clearance (Q/F), absorption rate constant (Ka), lag time, inter- and intra-individual variation) by Bayesian method. SCH 34117/SCH 45581: One-compartment model used as basic PK model. Individual Cmax was estimated with PPK parameters (above) on final model by Bayesian method. (NCT00730912)
Timeframe: After 2 and 4 weeks of treatment, and after 1 and 3 weeks of treatment if participant agreed

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
SCH 29851SCH 34117SCH 45581
Adults 16 to 64 Years6.484.612.35
Pediatrics 3 to 6 Years3.044.162.58
Pediatrics 7 to 15 Years5.544.302.56

[back to top]

Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis

An evaluation by the physician, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale, of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. Responses were assigned numerical values from 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse). (NCT00960141)
Timeframe: Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.53
Montelukast2.35
Loratadine2.26

[back to top]

Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis

An evaluation by the patient, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale, in answer to a single question regarding the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. Responses were assigned numerical values from 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse). (NCT00960141)
Timeframe: Week 2 (or upon discontinuation)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.62
Montelukast2.43
Loratadine2.27

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score

Patients completed a validated, self-administered questionnaire, which included 28 questions on a 7-point scale [score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)] across 7 domains: activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional. The scores for each domain were averaged, then the scores for the 7 domains were averaged for the overall score. (NCT00960141)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.75
Montelukast-0.85
Loratadine-0.97

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score

Mean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score on a 4-point scale [0(best) to 3(worst)]. The average of 3 scores (Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings) was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score. (NCT00960141)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.18
Montelukast-0.28
Loratadine-0.26

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score

Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms score on a 4-point scale [0(best) to 3(worst)]. The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores (Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing) was reported as the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score. (NCT00960141)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.32
Montelukast-0.38
Loratadine-0.47

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score

Mean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms scores on a 4-point scale [0(best) to 3(worst)]. The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores (tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes) was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score. (NCT00960141)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.23
Montelukast-0.29
Loratadine-0.35

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period

Patients completed a Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-28 questions on a 7-point scale [0(best) to 6(worst)] across 7 domains: activity,sleep,non-nose/eye symptoms,practical problems,nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotions. The scores for each domain were averaged, then scores for the 7 domains were averaged for an overall score. (NCT00963469)
Timeframe: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.55
Montelukast-0.85
Loratadine-0.85

[back to top]

Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment

An evaluation by the patient, administered after the first 2 weeks of treatment using a 7-point scale [Score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. (NCT00963469)
Timeframe: After first 2 weeks of treatment

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.73
Montelukast2.43
Loratadine2.30

[back to top]

Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment

An evaluation by the physician, administered after the first 2 weeks of treatment using a 7-point scale [Score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. (NCT00963469)
Timeframe: After first 2 weeks of treatment

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.75
Montelukast2.36
Loratadine2.38

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period

"Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score.~Patients were asked to rate each nasal symptom of Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing daily on a 4- point scale [Score 0 (best) to 3 (worse)]. The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score." (NCT00963469)
Timeframe: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.23
Montelukast-0.33
Loratadine-0.45

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period

"Mean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score.~Patients were asked to rate each symptom daily on a 4-point scale [Score 0 (best) to 3 (worse)], and the combined score of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score." (NCT00963469)
Timeframe: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.18
Montelukast-0.28
Loratadine-0.25

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period

"Mean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms scores.~Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 eye symptom of tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes daily on a 4-point scale [Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)]. The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score." (NCT00963469)
Timeframe: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.18
Montelukast-0.28
Loratadine-0.33

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Composite Symptoms Score (Daytime Nasal and Nighttime Symptoms) Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period

Composite Symptoms Scores were computed as the average of Daytime Nasal Scores [Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)] and Nighttime Symptoms Scores [Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)]. (NCT00963469)
Timeframe: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.21
Montelukast-0.30
Loratadine-0.36

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Itching Score

Patients were asked to rate the nasal symptom of Nasal Itching daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.26
Montelukast-0.49
Loratadine-0.56
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.62

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score

Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms score. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 nasal symptoms of Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score. (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.26
Montelukast-0.48
Loratadine-0.52
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.58

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Rhinorrhea Score

Patients were asked to rate the nasal symptom of Rhinorrhea daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.25
Montelukast-0.53
Loratadine-0.51
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.59

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Sneezing Score

Patients were asked to rate the nasal symptom of Sneezing daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.26
Montelukast-0.46
Loratadine-0.59
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.67

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening

Patients were asked to rate the symptom of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.15
Montelukast-0.35
Loratadine-0.30
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.32

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score

Mean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score. Patients were asked to rate each symptom daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)), and the combined score of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score. (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.12
Montelukast-0.29
Loratadine-0.26
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.28

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score

Patients completed a Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, 28 questions on a 7-point scale [0(best) to 6(worst)] across 7 domains: activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, emotional. Scores per domain were averaged, then scores for the 7 domains were averaged for an overall score. (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.80
Montelukast-1.09
Loratadine-1.06
Montelukast/Loratadine-1.16

[back to top]

Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis

An evaluation by the patient, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale, of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. Responses were assigned numerical values from 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.37
Montelukast2.10
Loratadine2.00
Montelukast/Loratadine1.92

[back to top]

Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis

An evaluation by the physician, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale, of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. Responses were assigned numerical values from 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.35
Montelukast2.13
Loratadine2.05
Montelukast/Loratadine1.99

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score

Mean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms scores. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 eye symptom of tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score. (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.14
Montelukast-0.35
Loratadine-0.38
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Composite Symptoms Score (Daytime Nasal and Nighttime Symptoms)

Composite Symptoms scores were computed as the average of the Daytime Nasal Symptoms scores and Nighttime Symptoms scores collected on a 4 point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.2
Montelukast-0.40
Loratadine-0.41
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.45

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Congestion Score

Patients were asked to rate the nasal symptom of Congestion daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). (NCT00963599)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.19
Montelukast-0.41
Loratadine-0.39
Montelukast/Loratadine-0.43

[back to top]

Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment Period

An evaluation by the patient, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale [Score 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse)], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. (NCT00972738)
Timeframe: End of the 2-week treatment period

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Montelukast 10 mg2.18
Loratadine 10 mg2.19
Placebo2.49

[back to top]

Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment Period

An evaluation by the physician, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale [Score 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse)], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. (NCT00972738)
Timeframe: End of the 2-week treatment period

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Montelukast 10 mg2.18
Loratadine 10 mg2.16
Placebo2.41

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period

Mean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms scores. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 eye symptoms of tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes daily on a 4-point scale [0 (best) to 3 (worst)]. The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score. (NCT00972738)
Timeframe: Baseline and over the 2-week treatment period

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Montelukast 10 mg-0.28
Loratadine 10 mg-0.40
Placebo-0.21

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period

Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 nasal symptoms of Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing daily on a 4-point scale [Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)]. The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score. (NCT00972738)
Timeframe: Baseline and over the 2-week treatment period

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Montelukast 10 mg-0.38
Loratadine 10 mg-0.47
Placebo-0.29

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period

Mean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score. Patients were asked to rate each symptoms of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings daily on a 4-point [Scale 0 (best) to 3 (worst)]. The average of the individual symptoms scores was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score. (NCT00972738)
Timeframe: Baseline and over the 2-week treatment period

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Montelukast 10 mg-0.28
Loratadine 10 mg-0.28
Placebo-0.20

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After the 2-week Treatment Period

Patients completed a validated, self-administered Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, which included 28 questions on a 7-point scale [Score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)], across 7 domains: activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional. The individual domain scores were calculated as the average values of all scores within a domain, then the scores for the 7 domains were averaged for the overall score. (NCT00972738)
Timeframe: Baseline and at the end of 2-week treatment period

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Montelukast 10 mg-0.90
Loratadine 10 mg-0.98
Placebo-0.66

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Overall Score at Week 2

Patients completed the validated, self-administered RQLQ, which included 28 items on a 7-point scale across 7 domains: activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional. Scores for each domain were averaged, then scores for the 7 domains were averaged for the overall score. Scores were measured as 0 (best) to 6 (worst). (NCT00979901)
Timeframe: Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.65
Montelukast 10 mg-0.89
Loratadine 10 mg-0.99

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over 2 Weeks

"Mean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score.~Patients were asked to rate each symptom daily on a 4-point scale, and the combined score of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score. Scores were measured as 0 (best) to 3 (worst)." (NCT00979901)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.14
Montelukast 10 mg-0.27
Loratadine 10 mg-0.23

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over 2 Weeks

"Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms score.~Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 nasal symptoms of Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing daily~on a 4-point scale. The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Nasal~Symptoms Score. Scores were measured as 0 (best) to 3 (worst)." (NCT00979901)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.24
Montelukast 10 mg-0.37
Loratadine 10 mg-0.47

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over 2 Weeks

"Mean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms scores.~Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 eye symptoms of tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes daily on a 4-point scale. The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score. Scores were measured as 0 (best) to 3 (worst)." (NCT00979901)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.12
Montelukast 10 mg-0.26
Loratadine 10 mg-0.32

[back to top]

Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at Week 2

An evaluation by the physician, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale, of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. Scores were measured as 0 (best) to 6 (worst). (NCT00979901)
Timeframe: Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.53
Montelukast 10 mg2.23
Loratadine 10 mg2.17

[back to top]

Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at Week 2

"An evaluation by the patient, administered at the last visit (or~upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale, of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the~study. Scores were measured as 0 (best) to 6 (worst)." (NCT00979901)
Timeframe: Week 2

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.62
Montelukast 10 mg2.20
Loratadine 10 mg2.13

[back to top]

Number of Participants by Relief Level as Evaluated by the Participant

Efficacy of treatment was assessed by the participant using a scale from 0-4 for relief levels, where 0 = no relief (symptoms unchanged or worsened than before), 1 = slight relief (symptoms present and only minimally improved), 2 = moderate relief (symptoms are present and may be troublesome, but are noticeably improved), 3 = marked relief (symptoms are greatly improved and although present are scarcely troublesome) and 4 = complete relief (virtually no symptom present). (NCT01154153)
Timeframe: At end of study (43-50 days after randomization)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Relief level 0 (No relief)Relief level 1 (Slight relief)Relief level 2 (Moderate relief)Relief level 3 (Marked relief)Relief level 4 (Complete relief)
Placebo91716145
TAA-AQ52213169

[back to top]

Ratio of Serum Cortisol Area Under Curve [AUC(0-24 hr)] at the End of Treatment to Baseline

"Blood samples were collected over a 24-hour period (at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, and 24 hours), with 0 hour being between 8:00AM to 9:00AM, immediately prior to investigational product (IP) administration. AUC (0-24hr) was calculated using the trapezoid rule, and was normalized by dividing the AUC(0-24 hr) by the actual sample collection interval between 0-hour and 24-hour blood draw times.~Ratio in Serum Cortisol AUC(0-24 hr) = (Serum Cortisol AUC[0-24 hr] at 6 weeks postrandomization)/(Serum Cortisol AUC[0-24 hr] at 1-3 days prerandomization). Log transformation was used for the analysis." (NCT01154153)
Timeframe: 1-3 days prerandomization and 6 weeks postrandomization

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Placebo0.938
TAA-AQ0.898

[back to top]

Number of Participants by Relief Level as Evaluated by the Physician

Efficacy of treatment was assessed by the physician using a scale from 0-4 for relief levels, where 0 = no relief (symptoms unchanged or worsened than before), 1 = slight relief (symptoms present and only minimally improved), 2 = moderate relief (symptoms are present and may be troublesome, but are noticeably improved), 3 = marked relief (symptoms are greatly improved and although present are scarcely troublesome) and 4 = complete relief (virtually no symptom present). (NCT01154153)
Timeframe: At end of study (43-50 days after randomization)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Relief Level 0 (No relief)Relief Level 1 (Slight relief)Relief Level 2 (Moderate relief)Relief Level 3 (Marked relief)Relief Level 4 (Complete relief)
Placebo111816133
TAA-AQ91320176

[back to top]

The Percent of Days of Rescue Medication Use During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

The percent of days of rescue medication used during the double-blind treatment phase was calculated. For participants who did not use any rescue medication, the percentage of days using rescue medication was set to be 0. (NCT01154153)
Timeframe: From randomization to 43-50 days postrandomization

InterventionPercentage of days (Mean)
Placebo4.02
TAA-AQ3.07

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)

"Every morning, participants rated the severity of symptoms experienced over the previous 24 hours using scale from 0-3, where 0=symptoms absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe symptoms (interfere with daily living or sleep) for each symptom (nasal congestion, nasal itching, sneezing, and runny nose). The rTNSS was the sum of the individual symptom scores, ranged from 0-12 (where 12 reflected the worst symptoms).~Change from baseline in the rTNSS = mean rTNSS (double-blind treatment phase) - mean rTNSS (screening phase)." (NCT01154153)
Timeframe: From 8-24 days prerandomization up to 6 weeks postrandomization

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-0.22
TAA-AQ-1.07

[back to top]

Number of Participants Using Rescue Medication

The number of participants using the rescue medication (Claritin®) during the single-blind screening phase (the time from 8-24 days before randomization up to the day before randomization) and during the double-blind treatment phase (the time from randomization to end of study). (NCT01154153)
Timeframe: From 8 to 24 days prerandomization and randomization to end of study (43-50 days postrandomization)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Prerandomization periodPostrandomization period
Placebo824
TAA-AQ819

[back to top]

Change From Baseline for the Instantaneous Nasal Symptom Assessment Score at Day 7

The magnitude of effect was measured as the change from baseline for the instantaneous nasal symptom assessment score at Day 7. Instantaneous assessment of nasal symptoms was performed once daily before the morning dose. The instantaneous assessment was a composite score of four nasal symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing and is rated on a 0-3 scale of severity with 0 = absent symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms, and 3 = severe symptoms. (NCT01330017)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
PE 10 mg-0.382
PE 20 mg-0.376
PE 30 mg-0.408
PE 40 mg-0.404
Placebo-0.380

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Evening (p.m.) Symptom Score for the Nasal Reflective Symptom Assessment by Study Day of the Treatment Period

The evening reflective nasal congestion score was captured in participant diaries just before the 8;00 p.m. dose. It is a composite score including four nasal symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing and is rated on a 0-3 scale of severity with 0 = absent, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms, and 3 = severe symptoms. (NCT01330017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7

,,,,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Baseline (n = 109, 108, 106, 111, 102)Day 1 (n = 102, 106, 101, 102, 101)Day 2 (n = 102, 103, 102, 103, 101)Day 3 (n = 104, 104, 101, 101, 101)Day 4 (n = 104, 104, 101, 99, 100)Day 5 (n = 104, 102, 97, 99, 99)Day 6 (n = 104, 103, 100, 100, 100)Day 7 (n = 104, 102, 100, 98, 100)
PE 10 mg2.376-0.321-0.360-0.546-0.536-0.526-0.613-0.613
PE 20 mg2.361-0.285-0.410-0.512-0.474-0.610-0.750-0.650
PE 30 mg2.363-0.359-0.483-0.527-0.597-0.564-0.648-0.588
PE 40 mg2.362-0.321-0.466-0.480-0.533-0.475-0.597-0.564
Placebo2.380-0.287-0.386-0.505-0.450-0.485-0.470-0.520

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in the Daily Reflective Nasal Congestion Score

The reflective nasal congestion score was captured in participant diaries just before the 8:00 a.m. dose and 12 hours later just before the 8:00 p.m. dose. Participants rated congestion on a 4-point scale of severity from 0 (best) to 3 (worst), with 0 = absent symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms, and 3 = severe symptoms. The daily reflective nasal congestion symptom score was defined as the average of the morning and evening reflective nasal congestion score for the entire treatment period. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily scores over the 4 consecutive 24-hour periods before randomization. (NCT01330017)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
PE 10 mg-0.460
PE 20 mg-0.499
PE 30 mg-0.508
PE 40 mg-0.461
Placebo-0.428

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Morning (a.m.) Symptom Score for the Nasal Reflective Symptom Assessment by Study Day of the Treatment Period

The morning reflective nasal congestion score was captured in participant diaries just before the 8:00 am dose. It is a composite score including four nasal symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing and it is rated on a 0-3 scale of severity with 0 = absent symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms, and 3 = severe symptoms. (NCT01330017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7

,,,,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Baseline (n = 109, 108, 106, 111, 102)Day 2 (n = 104, 106, 102, 104, 101)Day 3 (n = 104, 104, 102, 103, 101)Day 4 (n = 104, 104, 101, 102, 101)Day 5 (n = 104, 104, 101, 100, 100)Day 6 (n = 104, 104, 100, 100, 100)Day 7 (n = 104, 103, 100, 99, 100)
PE 10 mg2.417-0.243-0.359-0.503-0.426-0.474-0.541
PE 20 mg2.517-0.200-0.362-0.439-0.458-0.612-0.472
PE 30 mg2.481-0.216-0.324-0.485-0.465-0.584-0.594
PE 40 mg2.492-0.308-0.369-0.510-0.474-0.474-0.539
Placebo2.514-0.283-0.362-0.422-0.392-0.428-0.438

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline for the Daily Reflective Nasal Symptom Assessment Score by Study Day of the Treatment Period

The reflective nasal congestion score was captured in participant diaries just before the 8:00 a.m. dose and 12 hours later just before the 8:00 p.m. dose. It is a composite score including four nasal symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing and is rated on a 0-3 scale of severity with 0 = absent symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms, and 3 = severe symptoms. The daily reflective nasal congestion symptom score was defined as the average of the morning and evening reflective nasal congestion score for the entire treatment period. (NCT01330017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7

,,,,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Baseline (n = 109. 108, 106, 111, 102)Day 1 (n = 102, 106, 101, 102, 101)Day 2 (n = 104, 106, 102, 104, 101)Day 3 (n = 104, 104, 102, 103, 101)Day 4 (n = 104, 104, 101, 102, 101)Day 5 (n = 104, 104, 101, 100, 101)Day 6 (n = 104, 104, 100, 100, 100)Day 7 (n = 104, 103, 100, 99, 100)
PE 10 mg2.394-0.353-0.297-0.451-0.519-0.475-0.543-0.576
PE 20 mg2.452-0.367-0.320-0.449-0.468-0.550-0.689-0.573
PE 30 mg2.440-0.431-0.367-0.441-0.559-0.529-0.635-0.610
PE 40 mg2.437-0.389-0.392-0.425-0.520-0.484-0.544-0.556
Placebo2.457-0.364-0.345-0.444-0.449-0.444-0.460-0.490

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline for the Instantaneous Nasal Symptom Assessment Score By Study Day of the Treatment Period

"Instantaneous assessment of nasal symptoms was performed once daily before the~morning dose. The instantaneous assessment was a composite score of four nasal symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing and is rated on a 0-3 scale of severity with 0 = absent symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms, and 3 = severe symptoms." (NCT01330017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7

,,,,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Baseline (n = 107, 106, 104, 106, 101)Day 2 (n = 102, 104, 100, 99, 100)Day 3 (n = 102, 102, 100, 98, 100)Day 4 (n = 102, 102, 99, 97, 100)Day 5 (n = 102, 102, 99, 95, 100)Day 6 (n =102, 102, 98, 95, 100)Day 7 (n = 102, 101, 98, 94, 100)
PE 10 mg2.271-0.147-0.265-0.324-0.304-0.353-0.382
PE 20 mg2.3110.010-0.206-0.255-0.314-0.422-0.376
PE 30 mg2.298-0.060-0.130-0.253-0.283-0.337-0.408
PE 40 mg2.311-0.010-0.112-0.351-0.232-0.379-0.404
Placebo2.406-0.180-0.130-0.280-0.240-0.260-0.380

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the a.m. Symptom Score for the Instantaneous Nasal Symptom Assessment by Study Day of the Treatment Period

"Instantaneous assessment of nasal symptoms was performed once daily before the~morning dose. The instantaneous assessment was a composite score of four nasal symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing and is rated on a 0-3 scale of severity with 0 = absent symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms, and 3 = severe symptoms." (NCT01330017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7

,,,,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Baseline (n = 107, 106, 104, 106, 101)Day 2 (n = 104, 105, 102, 103, 101)Day 3 (n = 104, 103, 102, 102, 101)Day 4 (n = 104, 103,101,101, 101)Day 5 (n = 104, 103, 101, 99, 101)Day 6 (n = 104, 104, 100, 99, 100)Day 7 (n = 104, 102, 100, 98, 100)
PE 10 mg2.271-0.147-0.265-0.324-0.304-0.353-0.382
PE 20 mg2.3110.010-0.206-0.255-0.314-0.422-0.376
PE 30 mg2.298-0.060-0.130-0.253-0.283-0.337-0.408
PE 40 mg2.311-0.010-0.112-0.351-0.232-0.379-0.404
Placebo2.406-0.180-0.130-0.280-0.240-0.260-0.380

[back to top]

Time to Maximal Effect

Time to maximal effect is defined as the earliest time that the nasal congestion symptom score demonstrates the greatest numerical difference from the placebo in change from baseline. The mean change from baseline scores for a treatment arm and for the placebo arm at each day and timepoint of the treatment period (Day 1 morn, Day 1 eve, etc) were calculated. Then the difference between the placebo and treatment arm means at each day/timepoint of the treatment period was calculated and recorded the day/timepoint that the difference between the treatment arm and the placebo was highest. (NCT01330017)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 7

InterventionDays (Number)
PE 10 mg5.5
PE 20 mg5.5
PE 30 mg5.5
PE 40 mg5.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to Adverse Events

Discontinuation/withdrawal of study treatment due to an adverse event was performed at the discretion of the investigator or the Sponsor for safety concerns. An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure. (NCT01390441)
Timeframe: Parts A and B: Up to Week 28; Extension A and B: Up to 82 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Part A: MK-8808 500 mg/m^22
Part A: MabThera® 500 mg/m^22
Part B: MK-8808 1000 mg1
Part B: MabThera® 1000 mg1
Part B: Rituxan® 1000 mg2
Extension A: MK-8808 500 mg/m^2 /MK-8808 1000 mg0
Extension A: MabThera® 500 mg/m^2 /MK-8808 1000 mg0
Extension B: MK-8808 1000 mg /MK-8808 1000 mg0
Extension B: MabThera® 1000 mg /MK-8808 1000 mg0
Extension B: Rituxan® 1000 mg/MK-8808 1000 mg0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event

An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure. (NCT01390441)
Timeframe: Parts A and B: Up to 52 weeks; Extension A and B: Up to 106 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Part A: MK-8808 500 mg/m^218
Part A: MabThera 500 mg/m^221
Part B: MK-8808 1000 mg12
Part B: MabThera 1000 mg16
Part B: Rituxan 1000 mg13
Extension A: MK-8808 500 mg/m^2 /MK-8808 1000 mg2
Extension A: MabThera 500 mg/m^2 /MK-8808 1000 mg2
Extension B: MK-8808 1000 mg /MK-8808 1000 mg0
Extension B: MabThera 1000 mg /MK-8808 1000 mg0
Extension B: Rituxan1000 mg/MK-8808 1000 mg0

[back to top]

Part A: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) After the Second Infusion of a Single Course of Treatment

Cmax is a measure of the maximum plasma concentration of drug; samples are collected on Day 15 after the second infusion of the first course of treatment. Descriptive data values and associated dispersion measures (confidence intervals) are expressed in terms of the factor 10E3. (NCT01390441)
Timeframe: Day 15

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Part A: MK-8808 500 mg/m^2326.49
Part A: MabThera® 500 mg/m^2332.39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in 28 Joints C-Reactive Protein Score (DAS28-CRP) by Time-point

The DAS28-CRP is a combination scoring method for function using the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) 28 joint count and the CRP value. The DAS28-CRP scores range from 2.0 to 10.0 with higher values indicating a higher disease activity. A DAS28-CRP below the score of 2.6 is interpreted as Remission. CRP values below lower limit of quantification (LLQ) (<0.4 mg/dL) were set to 0.2 mg/dL in the calculation of DAS28-CRP. (NCT01390441)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

,
InterventionScore (Mean)
Week 6 (n=22, n=20)Week 12 (n=21, n=21)
Part A: MabThera® 500 mg/m^2-1.16-2.04
Part A: MK-8808 500 mg/m^2-1.39-1.68

[back to top]

Part A: Number of ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 Responders at Week 24

"American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Responder Index is based on a set of evaluations: the Investigator Tender Joint Count/Number of Tender Joints (out of 68 Joints); Investigator Swollen Joint Count/Number of Swollen Joints (out of 66 Joints); Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGAD); Investigator Global Assessment of Disease Activity (IGAD); Patient Global Assessment of Pain (PGAP); Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI); and ESR. ACR response indicates percent change (ie, improvement) from baseline (20%, 50%, 70%) PGAD & IGAD: assessment of function on a 4-point Likert scale: 0=very well to 3=unable to do PGAP: pain due to arthritis measured on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale: Left hand marker-no pain; right hand marker-extreme pain HAQ-DI: assessment of 8 daily living activities (dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common daily activities) on 4-point Likert scale: 0=no difficulty to 3=unable to do" (NCT01390441)
Timeframe: Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ACR20ACR50ACR70
Part A: MabThera® 500 mg/m^220154
Part A: MK-8808 500 mg/m^223164

[back to top]

Part B: Number of ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 Responders at Week 24

"American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Responder Index is based on a set of evaluations: the Investigator Tender Joint Count/Number of Tender Joints (out of 68 Joints); Investigator Swollen Joint Count/Number of Swollen Joints (out of 66 Joints); Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGAD); Investigator Global Assessment of Disease Activity (IGAD); Patient Global Assessment of Pain (PGAP); Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI); and ESR. ACR response indicates percent change (ie, improvement) from baseline (20%, 50%, 70%) PGAD & IGAD: assessment of function on a 4-point Likert scale: 0=very well to 3=unable to do PGAP: pain due to arthritis measured on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale: Left hand marker-no pain; right hand marker-extreme pain HAQ-DI: assessment of 8 daily living activities (dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common daily activities) on 4-point Likert scale: 0=no difficulty to 3=unable to do" (NCT01390441)
Timeframe: Week 24

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ACR20ACR50ACR70
Part B: MabThera® 1000 mg17121
Part B: MK-8808 1000 mg16122
Part B: Rituxan® 1000 mg15131

[back to top]

Part A: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Day 0 to Day 84 (AUC0-84day) After a Single Course of Treatment

AUC is a measure of the amount of drug in the plasma over time; samples are collected at intervals from pre-dose up to 84 days after the dose. Descriptive data values and associated dispersion measures (confidence intervals) are expressed in terms of the factor 10E6. (NCT01390441)
Timeframe: Day 1 (pre- and post-dose), Day 3, Day 5, Day 8, Day 15, Day 17, Day 19, Day 22, Day 29, Day 43, Day 57, Day 85

Interventionhr*mg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Part A: MK-8808 500 mg/m^2110.56
Part A: MabThera® 500 mg/m^2110.12

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline for the Morning Instantaneous Symptom Assessment Scores for Each Day During the Treatment Period

The instantaneous assessment is a self-evaluation of the symptom severity at the moment of the assessment prior to the next dose. Baseline values were calculated as the mean from 4 consecutive 24-hour periods in which a symptom score was ≥1, prior to randomization. The daily nasal congestion score was calculated from data captured daily (morning) in the participant's diary during the run-in and treatment periods. Participants rated congestion on a 4-point scale of severity: 0 = best and 3 = worst symptoms. The average of individual instantaneous nasal scores was reported as the daily instantaneous nasal congestion score for each day of the treatment period. (NCT01413958)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6Day 7
Phenylephrine2.313-0.188-0.285-0.326-0.326-0.327-0.319
Placebo2.264-0.185-0.373-0.383-0.387-0.394-0.462

[back to top]

Time to Maximal Phenylephrine Effect

The time to maximal phenylephrine effect was defined as the earliest time that the nasal congestion symptom score in the Phenylephrine treatment group demonstrated the greatest numerical difference from the Placebo treatment group in change from baseline. The mean change from baseline scores for a Phenylephrine treatment arm and for the Placebo treatment arm at each timepoint of the treatment period (Day 1 morning, Day 1 evening, etc) was calculated. The difference between the Phenylephrine treatment arm and Placebo treatment arm mean at each timepoint of the treatment period was calculated. The time to maximal phenylephrine effect was the first timepoint at which the difference between the Phenylephrine treatment arm and the Placebo treatment arm was greatest. The results for the Placebo treatment arm are not presented as the result of this outcome measure is only relevant for the Phenylephrine treatment group. (NCT01413958)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 7

InterventionDays (Number)
Phenylephrine0.5

[back to top]

Day 7 Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Instantaneous Symptom Assessment Score

The instantaneous assessment is a self-evaluation of the symptom severity at the moment of the assessment prior to the next dose. Baseline values were calculated as the mean from 4 consecutive 24-hour periods in which a symptom score was ≥1, prior to randomization. The nasal congestion score was calculated from data captured twice daily (morning and evening) in the participant's diary during the run-in and treatment periods. Participants rated congestion on a 4-point scale of severity: 0 = best and 3 = worst symptoms). The average of individual instantaneous nasal scores was reported as the daily instantaneous nasal congestion score over the entire treatment period. (NCT01413958)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 7

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 7
Phenylephrine2.299-0.352
Placebo2.225-0.476

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline for the Evening Instantaneous Symptom Assessment Scores for Each Day During the Treatment Period.

The instantaneous assessment is a self-evaluation of the symptom severity at the moment of the assessment prior to the next dose. Baseline values were calculated as the mean from 4 consecutive 24-hour periods in which a symptom score was ≥1, prior to randomization. The daily nasal congestion score was calculated from data captured daily (evening) in the participant's diary during the run-in and treatment periods. Participants rated congestion on a 4-point scale of severity: 0 = best and 3 = worst symptoms. The average of individual instantaneous nasal scores was reported as the daily instantaneous nasal congestion score for each day of the treatment period. (NCT01413958)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6Day 7
Phenylephrine2.300-0.193-0.344-0.349-0.395-0.408-0.424-0.401
Placebo2.189-0.164-0.332-0.378-0.434-0.430-0.497-0.495

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline for the Evening Reflective Symptom Assessment Scores for Each Day During the Treatment Period

The reflective assessment is a self-evaluation of the symptom severity over the preceding 12 hours. Baseline values were calculated as the mean from 4 consecutive 24-hour periods in which a symptom score was ≥1, prior to randomization. The nasal congestion score was calculated from data captured daily (evening) in the participant's diary during the run-in and treatment periods. Participants rated congestion on a 4-point scale of severity: 0 = best and 3 = severe symptoms. The average of individual reflective nasal scores were reported as the daily reflective nasal congestion score for each day of the treatment period. (NCT01413958)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6Day 7
Phenylephrine2.353-0.257-0.343-0.402-0.420-0.475-0.463-0.464
Placebo2.261-0.187-0.362-0.404-0.511-0.470-0.509-0.528

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline for the Morning Reflective Symptom Assessment Scores for Each Day During the Treatment Period.

The reflective assessment is a self-evaluation of the symptom severity over the preceding 12 hours. Baseline values were calculated as the mean from 4 consecutive 24-hour periods in which a symptom score was ≥1, prior to randomization. The nasal congestion score was calculated from data captured daily (morning) in the participant's diary during the run-in and treatment periods. Participants rated congestion on a 4-point scale of severity: 0 = best and 3 = severe symptoms. The average of individual reflective nasal scores were reported as the daily reflective nasal congestion score for each day of the treatment period. (NCT01413958)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6Day 7
Phenylephrine2.357-0.263-0.402-0.367-0.451-0.456-0.478
Placebo2.274-0.273-0.380-0.469-0.480-0.462-0.489

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Instantaneous Symptom Assessment Score

The instantaneous assessment is a self-evaluation of the symptom severity at the moment of the assessment prior to the next dose. Baseline values were calculated as the mean from 4 consecutive 24-hour periods in which a symptom score was ≥1, prior to randomization. The daily nasal congestion score was calculated from data captured twice daily (morning and evening) in the participant's diary during the run-in and treatment periods. Participants rated congestion on a 4-point scale of severity: 0 = best and 3 = worst symptoms. The average of individual instantaneous nasal scores was reported as the daily instantaneous nasal congestion score over the entire treatment period. (NCT01413958)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 1-7

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEntire Treatment Period
Phenylephrine2.299-0.311
Placebo2.225-0.366

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Instantaneous Symptom Assessment Score Per Day

The instantaneous assessment is a self-evaluation of the symptom severity at the moment of the assessment prior to the next dose. Baseline values were calculated as the mean from 4 consecutive 24-hour periods in which a symptom score was ≥1, prior to randomization. The daily nasal congestion score was calculated from data captured twice daily (morning and evening) in the participant's diary during the run-in and treatment periods. Participants rated congestion on a 4-point scale of severity: 0 = best and 3 = worst symptoms. The average of individual instantaneous nasal scores was reported as the daily instantaneous nasal congestion score for each day of the treatment period. (NCT01413958)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6Day 7
Phenylephrine2.299-0.192-0.255-0.307-0.351-0.359-0.361-0.352
Placebo2.225-0.200-0.256-0.373-0.406-0.406-0.443-0.476

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Reflective Nasal Congestion Score

The reflective assessment is a self-evaluation of the symptom severity over the preceding 12 hours. Baseline values were calculated as the mean from 4 consecutive 24-hour periods in which a symptom score was ≥1, prior to randomization. The nasal congestion score was calculated from data captured twice daily (morning and evening) in the participant's diary during the run-in and treatment periods. Participants rated congestion on a 4-point scale of severity: 0 = absent symptoms (no sign/symptom evident), 1 = mild symptoms (sign/symptom clearly present, but minimal awareness; easily tolerated), 2 = moderate symptoms (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable), and 3 = severe symptoms (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping). The average of individual reflective nasal scores was reported as the daily reflective nasal congestion score over the entire treatment period. (NCT01413958)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 1-7

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline for Entire Treatment Period
Phenylephrine2.357-0.394
Placebo2.271-0.412

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Reflective Nasal Congestion Score Per Day

The reflective assessment is a self-evaluation of the symptom severity over the preceding 12 hours. Baseline values were calculated as the mean from 4 consecutive 24-hour periods in which a symptom score was ≥1, prior to randomization. The nasal congestion score was calculated from data captured twice daily (morning and evening) in the participant's diary during the run-in and treatment periods. Participants rated congestion on a 4-point scale of severity: 0 = best and 3 = severe symptoms. The average of individual reflective nasal scores were reported as the daily reflective nasal congestion score for each day of the treatment period. (NCT01413958)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6Day 7
Phenylephrine2.357-0.261-0.302-0.401-0.395-0.465-0.461-0.474
Placebo2.271-0.197-0.321-0.396-0.492-0.478-0.488-0.512

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Morning Predose Instantaneous Nasal Congestion Symptom Score

The instantaneous assessment is a self-evaluation of the symptom severity at the moment of the assessment prior to the next dose. Baseline values were calculated as the mean from 4 consecutive 24-hour periods in which a symptom score was ≥1, prior to randomization. The nasal congestion score was calculated from data captured daily (morning) in the participant's diary during the run-in and treatment periods. Participants rated congestion on a 4-point scale of severity: 0 = best and 3 = worst symptoms. The average of individual morning instantaneous nasal scores was reported as the daily morning instantaneous nasal congestion score over the entire treatment period. (NCT01413958)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 1-7

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEntire Treatment Period
Phenylephrine2.313-0.295
Placebo2.264-0.363

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Evening Reflective Symptom Assessment Score

The reflective assessment is a self-evaluation of the symptom severity over the preceding 12 hours. Baseline values were calculated as the mean from 4 consecutive 24-hour periods in which a symptom score was ≥1, prior to randomization. The daily evening nasal congestion score was calculated from data captured daily (evening) in the participant's diary during the run-in and treatment periods. Participants rated congestion on a 4-point scale of severity: 0 = best and 3 = worst symptoms). The average of individual reflective nasal scores was reported as the daily reflective nasal congestion score over the entire treatment period. (NCT01413958)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 1-7

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEntire Treatment Period
Phenylephrine2.353-0.403
Placebo2.261-0.424

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Morning Reflective Symptom Assessment Score

The reflective assessment is a self-evaluation of the symptom severity over the preceding 12 hours. Baseline values were calculated as the mean from 4 consecutive 24-hour periods in which a symptom score was ≥1, prior to randomization. The daily morning nasal congestion score was calculated from data captured daily (morning) in the participant's diary during the run-in and treatment periods. Participants rated congestion on a 4-point scale of severity: 0 = best and 3 = worst symptoms. The average of individual reflective nasal scores was reported as the daily reflective nasal congestion score over the entire treatment period. (NCT01413958)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 1-7

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEntire Treatment Period
Phenylephrine2.357-0.403
Placebo2.274-0.425

[back to top]

Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (RQLQ)

"The RQLQ is a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire developed to measure the physical, emotional, and social problems in adults with rhinoconjunctivitis. Questions were divided into 7 domains: sleep (3 questions), non-hay fever symptoms (7 questions), practical problems (3~questions), nasal symptoms (4 questions), eye symptoms (4 questions), and activities (3 questions), and emotions (4 questions). Individual items within the RQLQ are equally weighted. The questionnaire is analyzed directly from the scores recorded and the results are expressed as the mean score for each of the domains (i.e., domain scores range from 0 to 6). Six represents the greatest impairment and 0 represents the least impairment. Overall quality of life score is the mean score for all domains." (NCT01413958)
Timeframe: Up to Day 8

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 8
Phenylephrine3.6-0.8
Placebo3.5-0.9

[back to top]

Change in Wheal Reaction Area From Baseline --- 2 Hour

A research technician, blinded to the subject's condition, measured the extent of the skin inflammation at baseline and 2 hours post Claritin administration by tracing the wheal reaction after the histamine challenge (i.e. the slightly reddened, elevated area at the site of the challenge, a well-established measure of histamine response). The percentage change in the wheal reaction was calculated as the change (decrease) in the size relative to baseline, multiplied by 100. Wheal area was measured in mm^2. (NCT01451996)
Timeframe: baseline and 2 hours post administration of Claritin.

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Claritin Ads, Allergy+27.5
Zyrtec Ads, Allergy+29.0
Claritin Ads, Allergy-30.97
Zyrtec Ads, Allergy-25.0

[back to top]

Change in Wheal Reaction Area From Baseline --- 1 Hour

A research technician, blinded to the subject's condition, measured the extent of the skin inflammation at baseline and 1 hour post Claritin administration by tracing the wheal reaction after the histamine challenge (i.e. the slightly reddened, elevated area at the site of the challenge, a well-established measure of histamine response). The percentage change in the wheal reaction was calculated as the change (decrease) in the size relative to baseline, multiplied by 100. Wheal area was measured in mm^2. (NCT01451996)
Timeframe: baseline and 1 hours post administration of Claritin

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Claritin Ads, Allergy+10.8
Zyrtec Ads, Allergy+17.5
Claritin Ads, Allergy-14.18
Zyrtec Ads, Allergy-10.83

[back to top]

Mean Individual Symptom Scores for Itchy Eyes by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point

"The individual symptom score for Itchy Eyes was rated on a 5-point~scale of severity using the following scale: 0 = None (No symptoms), 1 = MILD (Symptom is present, but easily tolerated), 2 = MODERATE (Awareness of symptoms, bothersome, but tolerable), 3 = SEVERE (Definite awareness of symptoms, difficult to tolerate but does not interfere with activities), 4 = VERY SEVERE (Difficult to tolerate and interferes with the activities of daily living). The Itchy Eyes symptom score ranges from 0 - 5. Increasing scores are associated with increasing severity." (NCT01469234)
Timeframe: From time of sensitization (time 0) to end of visit (~8 hours)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
0 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)15 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=84)30 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)45 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)60 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)75 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)90 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)105 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)120 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)135 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)150 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)165 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)180 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)195 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)210 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)225 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)240 minutes (n=84, n=85, n=85)255 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)270 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)285 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)300 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)315 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)330 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)345 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)360 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)
Fexofenadine3.23.02.72.32.12.01.81.81.61.51.41.41.41.41.41.41.41.41.41.41.41.41.41.41.4
Loratadine3.02.62.42.21.91.91.81.81.61.51.51.51.41.51.41.51.61.41.41.31.41.41.51.41.5
Placebo3.12.82.42.42.21.91.91.81.71.71.61.71.71.81.71.71.71.61.61.71.71.71.61.81.7

[back to top]

Mean Individual Symptom Score for Runny Nose by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point

"The individual symptom score for Runny Nose was rated on a 5-point~scale of severity using the following scale: 0 = None (No symptoms), 1 = MILD (Symptom is present, but easily tolerated), 2 = MODERATE (Awareness of symptoms, bothersome, but tolerable), 3 = SEVERE (Definite awareness of symptoms, difficult to tolerate but does not interfere with activities), 4 = VERY SEVERE (Difficult to tolerate and interferes with the activities of daily living). The Runny Nose symptom score ranges from 0 - 5. Increasing scores are associated with increasing severity." (NCT01469234)
Timeframe: From time of sensitization (time 0) to end of visit (~8 hours)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
0 minutes15 minutes30 minutes45 minutes60 minutes75 minutes90 minutes105 minutes120 minutes135 minutes150 minutes165 minutes180 minutes195 minutes210 minutes225 minutes240 minutes255 minutes270 minutes285 minutes300 minutes315 minutes330 minutes345 minutes360 minutes
Fexofenadine3.23.02.92.62.32.22.12.12.02.02.01.81.91.91.81.81.81.71.81.91.81.81.81.81.9
Loratadine3.43.13.02.82.72.62.42.42.12.22.32.22.12.12.02.12.02.01.92.12.02.12.22.12.1
Placebo3.33.02.92.82.72.62.42.52.32.42.42.32.32.42.32.32.22.32.32.32.32.42.32.42.3

[back to top]

Mean Individual Symptom Score for Itchy Nose by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point

"The individual symptom score for Itchy Nose was rated on a 5-point~scale of severity using the following scale: 0 = None (No symptoms), 1 = MILD (Symptom is present, but easily tolerated), 2 = MODERATE (Awareness of symptoms, bothersome, but tolerable), 3 = SEVERE (Definite awareness of symptoms, difficult to tolerate but does not interfere with activities), 4 = VERY SEVERE (Difficult to tolerate and interferes with the activities of daily living). The Itchy Nose symptom score ranges from 0 - 5. Increasing scores are associated with increasing severity." (NCT01469234)
Timeframe: From time of sensitization (time 0) to end of visit (~8 hours)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
0 minutes15 minutes30 minutes45 minutes60 minutes75 minutes90 minutes105 minutes120 minutes135 minutes150 minutes165 minutes180 minutes195 minutes210 minutes225 minutes240 minutes255 minutes270 minutes285 minutes300 minutes315 minutes330 minutes345 minutes360 minutes
Fexofenadine3.33.22.82.62.42.32.12.11.81.81.81.71.81.71.71.71.71.71.71.81.81.81.71.71.8
Loratadine3.33.12.82.72.62.42.32.21.92.02.12.02.01.92.01.91.91.81.91.91.81.81.81.91.8
Placebo3.43.12.82.82.62.52.42.42.12.22.22.22.22.22.22.22.22.22.12.22.12.22.12.22.2

[back to top]

Mean Individual Symptom Scores for Itchy Mouth/Throat/Ears by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point

"The individual symptom score for Itchy Mouth/Throat/Ears was rated on a 5-point~scale of severity using the following scale: 0 = None (No symptoms), 1 = MILD (Symptom is present, but easily tolerated), 2 = MODERATE (Awareness of symptoms, bothersome, but tolerable), 3 = SEVERE (Definite awareness of symptoms, difficult to tolerate but does not interfere with activities), 4 = VERY SEVERE (Difficult to tolerate and interferes with the activities of daily living). The Itchy Mouth/Throat/Ears symptom score ranges from 0 - 5. Increasing scores are associated with increasing severity." (NCT01469234)
Timeframe: From time of sensitization (time 0) to end of visit (~8 hours)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
0 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)15 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)30 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)45 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)60 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)75 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)90 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)105 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)120 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)135 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)150 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)165 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)180 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)195 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)210 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)225 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)240 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)255 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=84)270 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)285 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)300 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)315 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)330 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)345 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)360 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)
Fexofenadine3.03.02.82.82.62.62.32.42.02.31.82.21.72.11.72.01.52.01.62.01.42.01.42.01.3
Loratadine3.03.22.63.02.32.82.02.71.92.61.82.51.72.41.62.31.52.31.52.41.52.41.42.31.4
Placebo2.93.02.62.82.42.82.32.62.12.51.92.41.82.41.92.31.72.41.72.41.82.41.72.51.7

[back to top]

Mean Individual Symptom Scores for Nasal Congestion by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point

"The individual symptom score for Nasal Congestion was rated on a 5-point~scale of severity using the following scale: 0 = None (No symptoms), 1 = MILD (Symptom is present, but easily tolerated), 2 = MODERATE (Awareness of symptoms, bothersome, but tolerable), 3 = SEVERE (Definite awareness of symptoms, difficult to tolerate but does not interfere with activities), 4 = VERY SEVERE (Difficult to tolerate and interferes with the activities of daily living). The Nasal Congestion symptom score ranges from 0 - 5. Increasing scores are associated with increasing severity." (NCT01469234)
Timeframe: From time of sensitization (time 0) to end of visit (~8 hours)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
0 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)15 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)30 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)45 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)60 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)75 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)90 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)105 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)120 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)135 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)150 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)165 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)180 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)195 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)210 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)225 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)240 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)255 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=84)270 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=84)285 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)300 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)315 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)330 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)345 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)360 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)
Fexofenadine3.22.21.52.11.42.11.32.11.42.11.32.01.32.01.32.01.42.01.32.11.32.11.32.01.4
Loratadine3.42.51.62.51.62.41.62.41.52.41.52.41.42.51.52.41.52.41.62.41.52.41.52.41.5
Placebo3.42.72.02.61.82.61.82.61.82.61.82.51.82.61.82.61.82.61.82.61.82.51.82.51.9

[back to top]

Mean Individual Symptom Scores for Sneezing by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point

"The individual symptom score for Sneezing was rated on a 5-point~scale of severity using the following scale: 0 = None (No symptoms), 1 = MILD (Symptom is present, but easily tolerated), 2 = MODERATE (Awareness of symptoms, bothersome, but tolerable), 3 = SEVERE (Definite awareness of symptoms, difficult to tolerate but does not interfere with activities), 4 = VERY SEVERE (Difficult to tolerate and interferes with the activities of daily living). The Sneezing symptom score ranges from 0 - 5. Increasing scores are associated with increasing severity." (NCT01469234)
Timeframe: From time of sensitization (time 0) to end of visit (~8 hours)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
0 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)15 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)30 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)45 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)60 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)75 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)90 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)105 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)120 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)135 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)150 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)165 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)180 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)195 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)210 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)225 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)240 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)255 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)270 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)285 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)300 minutes (n=84, n=85, n=85)315 minutes (n=84, n=85, n=85)330 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)345 minutes (n=84, n=85, n=85)360 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)
Fexofenadine1.21.21.10.90.70.80.60.60.50.70.60.50.60.60.50.60.50.40.50.60.50.40.60.60.6
Loratadine1.31.21.21.01.11.00.70.80.50.80.90.80.70.80.70.70.70.60.60.80.70.70.70.70.6
Placebo1.51.31.21.31.21.11.01.10.91.21.10.90.91.01.00.90.91.01.01.10.91.11.01.01.0

[back to top]

Mean Individual Symptom Scores for Watery Eyes by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point

"The individual symptom score for Water Eyes was rated on a 5-point~scale of severity using the following scale: 0 = None (No symptoms), 1 = MILD (Symptom is present, but easily tolerated), 2 = MODERATE (Awareness of symptoms, bothersome, but tolerable), 3 = SEVERE (Definite awareness of symptoms, difficult to tolerate but does not interfere with activities), 4 = VERY SEVERE (Difficult to tolerate and interferes with the activities of daily living). The Watery Eyes symptom score ranges from 0 - 5. Increasing scores are associated with increasing severity." (NCT01469234)
Timeframe: From time of sensitization (time 0) to end of visit (~8 hours)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
0 minutes15 minutes30 minutes45 minutes60 minutes75 minutes90 minutes105 minutes120 minutes135 minutes150 minutes165 minutes180 minutes195 minutes210 minutes225 minutes240 minutes255 minutes270 minutes285 minutes300 minutes315 minutes330 minutes345 minutes360 minutes
Fexofenadine2.82.62.32.01.91.81.61.61.31.31.21.21.11.21.11.11.11.11.11.21.11.21.21.21.3
Loratadine2.72.42.21.91.81.71.51.51.31.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.31.21.2
Placebo2.72.42.12.01.91.61.51.51.41.41.41.41.31.51.41.41.41.41.41.41.31.41.41.41.4

[back to top]

Mean Major Symptom Complex (MSC) Score by Post-Treatment Evaluation Time Point (From 180 Minutes to 300 Minutes)

The MSC Score is calculated as the sum of 5 individual symptom scores for Runny Nose, Itchy Nose, Sneezing, Watery Eyes, and Itchy Eyes. Each individual symptom is rated on a 5-point scale of severity: 0 = None (No symptoms), 1 = MILD (Symptom is present, but easily tolerated), 2 = MODERATE (Awareness of symptoms, bothersome, but tolerable), 3 = SEVERE (Definite awareness of symptoms, difficult to tolerate but does not interfere with activities), 4 = VERY SEVERE (Difficult to tolerate and interferes with the activities of daily living). The total MSC score ranges from 0 - 25. Increasing scores are associated with increasing severity. (NCT01469234)
Timeframe: From time of sensitization (time 0) to end of visit (~8 hours)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
180 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)195 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)210 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)225 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)240 minutes (n=84, n=85, n=85)255 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)270 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)285 minutes (n=85, n=85, n=85)300 minutes (n=84, n=85, n=85)
Fexofenadine6.76.76.56.56.56.36.46.96.5
Loratadine7.47.57.37.47.47.17.07.37.1
Placebo8.58.98.78.58.38.48.48.78.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event (AE)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the study treatment, whether or not considered related to the use of the study treatment. (NCT01673620)
Timeframe: Up to 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Montelukast 10 mg/Loratadine 10 mg6
Placebo2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to AEs

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the study treatment, whether or not considered related to the use of the study treatment. (NCT01673620)
Timeframe: Up to 2 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Montelukast 10 mg/Loratadine 10 mg1
Placebo0

[back to top]

Average Total Combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Score (TCS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment

The TCS is the sum of the rhinoconjunctivitis DSS (rhinitis DSS and conjunctivitis DSS; range: 0 to 18) and the rhinoconjunctivitis DMS (rhinitis DMS and conjunctivitis DMS; range: 0 to 20); the total possible TCS ranges from 0 to 38 points with higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity. The endpoint was calculated as the average daily diary entry score from the last 8 weeks of treatment. (NCT01700192)
Timeframe: Last 8 weeks of treatment (Weeks 44 to 52)

InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
MK-82376.40
Placebo7.62

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AE

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. (NCT01700192)
Timeframe: Up to 52 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
MK-823773
Placebo19

[back to top]

Average Rhinitis Daily Medication Score (Rhinitis DMS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment

The Rhinitis DMS ranges from a score of 0 to 12 (higher scores indicative of greater symptomatic medication use). The endpoint was calculated as the average daily diary entry score from the last 8 weeks of treatment. (NCT01700192)
Timeframe: Last 8 weeks of treatment (Weeks 44 to 52)

InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
MK-82370.84
Placebo1.03

[back to top]

Average Rhinitis Daily Symptom Score (Rhinitis DSS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment

The Rhinitis DSS ranges from a score of 0 to 12 (higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity). The endpoint was calculated as the average daily diary entry score from the last 8 weeks of treatment. (NCT01700192)
Timeframe: Last 8 weeks of treatment (Weeks 44 to 52)

InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
MK-82373.83
Placebo4.46

[back to top]

Average Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptoms Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment

"Participants indicated the severity of symptoms in the past week on a VAS with a score range of 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (severe symptoms). Symptoms were assessed during 2 clinic visits occurring during the final 8 weeks of treatment (VAS score reflects the mean of 2 scores)." (NCT01700192)
Timeframe: Last 8 weeks of treatment (Weeks 44 to 52)

InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
MK-823742.29
Placebo47.96

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience At Least One Adverse Event (AE)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. (NCT01700192)
Timeframe: Up to 54 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
MK-8237676
Placebo539

[back to top]

Average Total Combined Rhinitis Score (TCRS) During Last 8 Weeks of Treatment

The TCRS is the sum of the rhinitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS; range: 0 to 12) and the rhinitis Daily Medication Score (DMS; range: 0 to 12); the total possible TCRS ranges from 0 to 24 points with higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity. The endpoint was calculated as the average daily diary entry score from the last 8 weeks of treatment. (NCT01700192)
Timeframe: Last 8 weeks of treatment (Weeks 44 to 52)

InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
MK-82374.67
Placebo5.49

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Severe Bone Pain by Cycle and Across Cycles

Bone pain data were captured as part of standard adverse event reporting. Severe bone pain is defined as grade 3 or 4 according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 3 grading criteria: Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, and Grade 4 = Life-threatening or disabling. (NCT01712009)
Timeframe: Cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4 (approximately 4 weeks each, depending on the chemotherapy dosing interval)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cycle 1 (n=191, 196, 200)Cycle 2 (n=178, 180, 193)Cycle 3 (n=165, 176, 188)Cycle 4 (n=162, 169, 179)Across All Cycles (n=191, 196, 200)
Loratadine 10 mg QD4.50.00.00.04.5
Naproxen 500 mg BID3.11.71.10.64.1
No Prophylaxis4.71.11.81.95.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Bone Pain (All Grades) in Cycle 1

Bone pain data were captured as part of standard adverse event (AE) reporting. (NCT01712009)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (approximately 4 weeks, depending on the chemotherapy dosing interval)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
No Prophylaxis46.6
Naproxen 500 mg BID40.3
Loratadine 10 mg QD42.5

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Patient-reported Bone Pain

Patient-reported bone pain AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal rule with bone pain scores from day 1 to 5 for each cycle. The AUC across cycles is the average of AUCs across the cycle. (NCT01712009)
Timeframe: Five consecutive days during each cycle beginning on the day of pegfilgrastim administration (Day 2, 3, or 4 of each cycle)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale * days (Least Squares Mean)
Cycle 1 (n=191, 196, 200)Cycle 2 (n=178, 180, 193)Cycle 3 (n=165, 176, 188)Cycle 4 (n=162, 169, 179)Across All Cycles (n=191, 196, 200)
Loratadine 10 mg QD7.05.96.15.66.3
Naproxen 500 mg BID7.75.65.55.26.6
No Prophylaxis9.37.36.87.28.0

[back to top]

Maximum Patient-reported Bone Pain by Cycle and Across Cycles

Participants completed a brief bone pain survey once per day for 5 days beginning the day they received their pegfilgrastim injection. The bone pain survey collected the severity of pain using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) scale. Maximum patient-reported bone pain is the maximum of each participant's bone pain values across survey Days 1-5 within each cycle. Across all cycles the maximum is the maximum of each patient-reported bone pain value across all survey days 1-5 and across all cycles. An ANOVA model with treatment as explanatory term was used. (NCT01712009)
Timeframe: Five consecutive days during each cycle beginning on the day of pegfilgrastim administration (Day 2, 3, or 4 of each cycle)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Cycle 1 (n=191, 196, 200)Cycle 2 (n=178, 180, 193)Cycle 3 (n=165, 176, 188)Cycle 4 (n=162, 169, 179)Across All Cycles (n=191, 196, 200)
Loratadine 10 mg QD3.02.62.52.14.1
Naproxen 500 mg BID3.32.42.22.14.2
No Prophylaxis3.93.02.72.84.7

[back to top]

Mean Patient-reported Bone Pain by Cycle and Across Cycles

Participants completed a brief bone pain survey once per day for 5 days beginning the day they received their pegfilgrastim injection. The bone pain survey collected the severity of pain using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) scale. Mean patient-reported bone pain values are the average of each participant's bone pain values across survey days 1-5 within each cycle. Across all cycles the mean is the average of each patient-reported bone pain value across all survey days 1-5 and across all cycles. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment as explanatory term was used. (NCT01712009)
Timeframe: Five consecutive days during each cycle beginning on the day of pegfilgrastim administration (Day 2, 3, or 4 of each cycle)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Cycle 1 (n=191, 196, 200)Cycle 2 (n=178, 180, 193)Cycle 3 (n=165, 176, 188)Cycle 4 (n=162, 169, 179)Across all Cycles (n=191, 196, 200)
Loratadine 10 mg QD1.71.41.41.31.5
Naproxen 500 mg BID1.81.31.31.21.5
No Prophylaxis2.21.71.61.71.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

"Severity was graded using CTCAE version 3. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an adverse event that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria: • fatal; • life threatening; • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; • congenital anomaly/birth defect; • other medically important serious event.~The investigator assessed each adverse event for relatedness to investigational product(s) or other protocol-required therapies." (NCT01712009)
Timeframe: From first dose of investigational product (IP, naproxen or loratidine) or first dose of pegfilgrastim (Peg), whichever occurred first, until 30 days after last dose, up to 24 weeks.

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventWorst grade of ≥ 2Worst grade of ≥ 3Worst grade of ≥ 4Serious adverse eventsFatal adverse eventsAE leading to discontinuation from studySAE leading to discontinuation from studyAny adverse event related to IPSAE related to IPAE related to IP leading to discontinuation of IPSAE related to IP leading to discontinuation of IPAny adverse event related to pegfilgrastimSAE related to pegfilgrastimAE related to / leading to discontinuation of PegSAE related to / leading to discontinuation of Peg
Loratadine 10 mg QD1941686320140327000105160
Naproxen 500 mg BID1921697330300533019196030
No Prophylaxis188164741834031000087461

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Bone Pain (All Grades) by Cycle (2-4) and Across Cycles

Bone pain data were captured as part of standard adverse event (AE) reporting. (NCT01712009)
Timeframe: Cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4 (approximately 4 weeks each, depending on the chemotherapy dosing interval)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cycle 2 (n=178, 180, 193)Cycle 3 (n=165, 176, 188)Cycle 4 (n=162, 169, 179)Across All Cycles (n=191, 196, 200)
Loratadine 10 mg QD34.736.238.061.0
Naproxen 500 mg BID34.434.140.259.2
No Prophylaxis34.333.940.763.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Submental Skin Laxity Grades (SMSLG)

Skin laxity assessment was based on clinical evaluation and palpation of the submental area on the following scale: 1 = no laxity; 2 = mild laxity; 3 = moderate laxity; 4 = severe laxity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.2
Paradigm 1 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.1
Paradigm 2 / Placebo0.5
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.3
Paradigm 3 / Placebo0.5
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.3
Paradigm 4 / Placebo0.3

[back to top]

Bruising Grading Scale Scores

"The following grading system was used for the assessment of bruising:~Bruising absent (0)~Bruising associated with 1 to 3 needle insertion points (1)~Bruising spreading beyond 4 or more individual needle insertion points but contained within the treatment area (2)~Bruising covering the entire treatment area but contained within the treatment area (3)~Bruising of the neck and face beyond the treatment area (4)" (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 1 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 2 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 3 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 4 / Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS)

The CR-SMFRS score is based on the investigator's clinical evaluation of the participant, where submental fullness is scored on a 5-point ordinal scale (0-4) with 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = extreme. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.6
Paradigm 1 / Placebo-0.7
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.6
Paradigm 2 / Placebo-0.8
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.4
Paradigm 3 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.4
Paradigm 4 / Placebo-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale Scores

Participants were provided with a scale 100 mm in length and were asked to mark the place on the line that best represents his or her pain associated with the area treated with study drug. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (most severe pain possible). (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 1 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 2 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 3 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 4 / Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS)

"The PR-SMFRS is based on the participant's response to the question How much fat do you have under your chin right now? answered on a 5-point ordinal scale (0-4) with 0 = no chin fat at all, 1 = a slight amount of chin fat, 2 = a moderate amount of chin fat, 3 = a large amount of chin fat, and 4 = a very large amount of chin fat. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement." (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-1.2
Paradigm 1 / Placebo-0.7
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.9
Paradigm 2 / Placebo-0.5
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.8
Paradigm 3 / Placebo-0.8
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.7
Paradigm 4 / Placebo-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Subject Self Rating Scale (SSRS)

The SSRS assesses participant's satisfaction with their appearance in association with the face and chin on a 7-point scale from 0 to 6: where 0 = Extremely dissatisfied, 1 = Dissatisfied, 2 = Slightly dissatisfied, 3 = Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = Slightly satisfied, 5 = Satisfied and 6 = Extremely satisfied. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection2.8
Paradigm 1 / Placebo2.3
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection3.2
Paradigm 2 / Placebo1.8
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection2.3
Paradigm 3 / Placebo2.3
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection2.4
Paradigm 4 / Placebo2.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Submental Fat Thickness

Submental thickness was measured using caliper devices. (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 84

Interventionmm (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-1.4
Paradigm 1 / Placebo-2.3
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-1.6
Paradigm 2 / Placebo-0.3
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-0.9
Paradigm 3 / Placebo-2.3
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection-1.5
Paradigm 4 / Placebo-2.8

[back to top]

Induration Grading Scale Scores

"The following grading system was used for the assessment of induration:~Induration absent to minimal (0)~Induration associated with at least approximately 30% of the treatment area (1)~Induration associated with greater than approximately 30% to at least 60% of the treatment area (2)~Induration covering the entire treatment area but contained within the treatment area (3)~Induration of the neck and face beyond the treatment area (4)" (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 1 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.1
Paradigm 2 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 3 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.1
Paradigm 4 / Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Swelling Grading Scale Scores

"The following grading system was used for the assessment of swelling:~Swelling/edema absent (0)~Minimal swelling/edema contained within treatment area (1)~Modest swelling/edema contained within treatment area (2)~Substantial swelling/edema contained within treatment area (3)~Swelling/edema of the neck and face beyond the treatment area (4)" (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 1 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 2 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 3 / Placebo0.0
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.0
Paradigm 4 / Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pain Assessment Using McGill Pain Questionnaire

Participants rated 15 pain characteristics by using a number to signify how much of that specific type of pain they were experiencing using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire. The pain characteristic options included Throbbing, Shooting, Stabbing, Sharp, Cramping, Gnawing, Hot-burning, Aching, Heavy, Tender, Splitting, Tiring-exhausting, Sickening, Fearful, and Punishing- cruel. Participants assessed the intensity of each characteristic using the following score system: none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), and severe (3). In addition, present pain was assessed on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 5 (excruciating). (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Baseline (predose) and Day 84

,,,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
ThrobbingShootingStabbingSharpCrampingGnawingHot-BurningAchingHeavyTenderSplittingTiring-ExhaustingSickeningFearfulPunishing-CruelPresent pain
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Paradigm 1 / Placebo0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.00.00.00.0
Paradigm 2 / Placebo0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.0
Paradigm 3 / Placebo0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Paradigm 4 / Placebo0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

Patient Experience Questions

"Participants were asked to complete 3 patient experience questions, each answered as Yes or No:~Given your experience in this study:~Would you recommend this procedure to a friend?~Would you agree to receive additional treatments?~Has the treatment you received in this study affected your normal activities?~The percentage of participants answering Yes on each question is reported." (NCT02007434)
Timeframe: Day 84

,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Recommend to a FriendReceive Additional TreatmentsNormal Activity Affected
Paradigm 1 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection818113
Paradigm 1 / Placebo33670
Paradigm 2 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection818813
Paradigm 2 / Placebo50500
Paradigm 3 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection949419
Paradigm 3 / Placebo1001000
Paradigm 4 / Deoxycholic Acid Injection727811
Paradigm 4 / Placebo7510025

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Pre-specified Local Application Site Reactions

Pre-specified local application site reactions, irrespective of causality, included AEs related to lip swelling/edema, mouth swelling/edema, palatal swelling/edema, swollen tongue/edema, oropharyngeal swelling/edema, pharyngeal edema/throat tightness, oral pruritus, throat irritation, tongue pruritus, and ear pruritus. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: Up to 35 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Short Ragween Pollen Allergen Extract64.52
Placebo26.92

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Anaphylaxis and/or Systemic Allergic Reactions

For the purposes of this study, systemic allergic reactions are allergic reactions that occur away from the site of study drug application (allergic reactions other than local application site reactions). Anaphylaxis is a severe allergic reaction that typically involves more than one body system. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: Up to 35 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Short Ragweed Pollen Allergen Extract0.58
Placebo0.20

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Treated With Epinephrine

Self-injectable epinephrine was provided to each participant/parent/guardian at randomization in countries where it is a regulatory requirement, and was to be available around the time treatment is administered at home. Self-injectable epinephrine was intended for immediate self-administration for an anaphylactic reaction, including symptoms/signs of upper airway obstruction. Instances of treatment with forms of epinephrine other than systemic epinephrine (e.g., inhaled racepinephrine) were counted as use of epinephrine. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: Up to 35 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Short Ragween Pollen Allergen Extract0.19
Placebo0.20

[back to top]

Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Peak Ragweed Season (RS)

TCS is daily symptom score (DSS) plus daily medication score (DMS), assessed in the peak RS (15 consecutive RS days with the highest 15-day average pollen count). The rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DSS assesses 6 allergy symptoms measured on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=no symptoms, 3=severe symptoms; score range: 0-18). Lower DSS indicates less RC symptoms. The RC DMS is based on use of RC rescue medications (loratadine, olopatadine, mometasone), with different rescue medications being assigned different scores/dose unit (score range: 0-20). Lower DMS indicates less RC medication use. Summed RC DSS+DMS could range from 0 to 38; a lower score indicates less RC symptoms and medication use. Components that contribute to DSS and DMS endpoints are collected in an electronic diary (e-diary) completed by the participant/parent/guardian. Evaluation is based on average TCS during peak RS. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: The 15-day period during the ragweed season with the highest moving pollen average

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Short Ragweed Pollen Allergen Extract4.39
Placebo7.12

[back to top]

Average TCS During the Entire RS

TCS is DSS plus DMS, assessed here during the entire RS. This starts from the first day of 3 consecutive days with ragweed pollen counts ≥10 grains/m^3 through the last day of the last occurrence of 3 consecutive days with ragweed pollen counts ≥10 grains/m^3. The duration of the entire RS is up to 13 weeks; this duration varies by site/region. The RC DSS assesses 6 allergy symptoms measured on a scale of 0 to 3 (score range: 0-18). A lower DSS indicates less RC symptoms. The RC DMS is based on use of RC rescue medications (loratadine, olopatadine, mometasone) with different scores/dose unit (score range: 0-20). A lower DMS indicates less RC medication use. The sum of RC DSS+DMS ranges from 0 to 38, with a lower score indicating less RC symptoms and medication use. Components contributing to the TCS for the entire RS are collected in an e-diary completed by the participant/parent/guardian. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: Up to 13 weeks

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Short Ragweed Pollen Allergen Extract3.88
Placebo5.75

[back to top]

Average Rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DSS During the Peak RS

The DSS consists of a total of 6 rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms: 4 rhinitis symptoms (runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing, itchy nose) and 2 conjunctivitis symptoms (itchy eyes, watery eyes). The components that contribute to the DSS endpoint are collected in an e-diary completed by the participant/parent/guardian. The RC DSS is measured on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 as follows: 0 (no sign/symptom evident) to 3 (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate; may cause interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping). The maximum DSS is 18 points if a participant experiences all 6 symptoms with an intensity of 3 for each symptom. The minimum DSS is 0 points if a participant experiences no symptoms. A lower DSS means symptoms are less severe. The evaluation is based on the average DSS during the peak RS. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: The 15-day period during the ragweed season with the highest moving pollen average

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Short Ragweed Pollen Allergen Extract2.55
Placebo3.95

[back to top]

Average Rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DMS During the Peak RS

This DMS endpoint consists of a total of scores for use of RC medications: loratadine syrup or tablets (6 points), olopatadine (6 points), and mometasone (8 points). The score range of the RC DMS is 0-20 points, and a lower DMS means that less medication is used. The method used for analysis of the RC DMS is a zero-inflated log-normal model, which takes the average RC DMS during the peak RS as the response and adjusts for the same terms as in the ANOVA model. The components that contribute to the DMS endpoint are collected in an e-diary completed by the participant/parent/guardian. (NCT02478398)
Timeframe: The 15-day period during the ragweed season with the highest moving pollen average

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Short Ragweed Pollen Allergen Extract2.01
Placebo3.85

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR)

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, or C4d staining positive.Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Experimental0.0
Control0.0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR).

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, or C4d staining positive. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participant (Number)
Experimental1.3
Control0.0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection AMR or Suspicious for AMR

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR or suspicious for AMR within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, C4d staining positive, or suspicious. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes; suspicious-when 2 of 3 factors for acute/active are present. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental2.8
Control0.0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection AMR or Suspicious for AMR.

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR or suspicious for AMR within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, C4d staining positive, or suspicious. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes; suspicious-when 2 of 3 factors for acute/active are present (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental3.8
Control1.4

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR)

Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection.Criteria include: IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 month post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental4.2
Control3.0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR) or Borderline Rejection

Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of borderline or greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as Borderline, IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with borderline representing possible cellular rejection, IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection, and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Criteria include: Borderline-no intimal arteritis is present but foci of mild tubulitis; IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental12.8
Control7

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR) or Borderline Rejection.

Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of borderline or greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as Borderline, IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with borderline representing possible cellular rejection, IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection, and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection.Criteria include: Borderline-no intimal arteritis is present but foci of mild tubulitis; IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental8.5
Control6.1

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR).

Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Criteria include: IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental5.1
Control4.2

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With BK Viremia That Require a Change in Immunosuppression or Anti-viral Treatment as Per Standard of Care at the Site.

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of BK viremia that required a change in their existing immunosuppression or the use of anti-viral therapy. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Experimental28.9
Control13.4

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With CMV Viremia That Require a Change in Immunosuppression or Anti-viral Treatment as Per Standard of Care at the Site

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of CMV viremia that required a change in their existing immunosuppression or the use of anti-viral therapy. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental18.4
Control11.6

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With de Novo DSA.

Donor specific antibody (DSA) can be formed post-transplant as part of the recipient's alloimmune response to the transplanted organ. DSA was determined by a central laboratory. Participants with newly developed DSA (i.e., de novo) following transplant were considered to have met this endpoint. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental8.0
Control3.6

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Death or Graft Failure.

Participants who died or experienced graft failure were considered to have met this endpoint. Graft failure was defined as the need for post-transplant dialysis for more than 56 days. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental5.3
Control7.1

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Impaired Wound Healing Manifested by Wound Dehiscence, Wound Infection, or Hernia at the Site of the Transplant Incision

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of impaired wound healing at the site of the transplant incision manifested by one wound dehiscence, wound infection, or hernia. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Experimental7.9
Control11.6

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Locally Treated Rejection, Defined as Treatment Administered for Rejection Based on Clinical Signs or Biopsy Findings.

Biopsies were read by the local pathologist at the hospital where the participant was a patient. These local reads informed clinical care for the participant, which may or may not include prescribing/administering medication to the participant to help with clinical concerns or findings noted on a biopsy. Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they have a report of receiving treatment for clinical or biopsy-proven rejection during the 24 month post-transplant follow-up. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental16.2
Control27

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Locally Treated Rejection, Defined as Treatment Administered for Rejection Based on Clinical Signs or Biopsy Findings.

Biopsies were read by the local pathologist at the hospital where the participant was a patient. These local reads informed clinical care for the participant, which may or may not include prescribing/administering medication to the participant to help with clinical concerns or findings noted on a biopsy. Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they have a report of receiving treatment for clinical or biopsy-proven rejection during the first 6 months post-transplant. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental12.6
Control20.5

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Malignancy.

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of malignancy. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Experimental1.8
Control0.9

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Mycobacterial or Fungal Infections

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had at least one mycobacterial of fungal infection. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental6.1
Control6.3

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Only Graft Failure.

Participants who experienced graft failure were considered to have met this endpoint. Graft failure was defined as the need for post-transplant dialysis for more than 56 days. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental2.7
Control2.7

[back to top]

The Difference Between the Mean eGFR (Modified MDRD) in the Experimental vs. Control Groups.

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the month 24 eGFR for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24-Month post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental52.45
Control57.35

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants Who Need Dialysis After Week 1.

Participants who needed dialysis after the first week post-transplant were considered to have met this endpoint. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 1 week to 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental9.0
Control2.8

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants Whose Day 2 Serum CRR Was Less Than 30%.

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 2 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function. A participant was considered to have met this endpoint if their day 2 serum CRR was less than 30%. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 2 post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental57.1
Control68.6

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants Whose Day 5 Serum CRR Was Less Than 70%.

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 5 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function. A participant was considered to have met this endpoint if their day 5 serum CRR was less than 70%. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 5 post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental74.4
Control88.4

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants With a Serum Creatinine of More Than 3 mg/dL.

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. This endpoint is ascertaining slow graft function in the immediate days post-transplant. A participant was considered to have met this endpoint if their day 5 serum creatinine was greater than 3 mg/dL. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 5 post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental47.4
Control42.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Immediately After Surgery) in Serum Creatinine.

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. eGFR values from 24, 48, and 72 hours post-transplant (i.e., days 1, 2, and 3) were used to generate an estimate of the serum creatinine at each time point of interest for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24, 48 and 72 hours post-transplantation

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
24 Hours48 Hours72 Hours
Control6.855.875.21
Experimental7.356.245.77

[back to top]

eGFR Values as Measured by CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Days 30, 90, and 180 post-transplantation

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Day 30Day 90Day 180
Control50.6351.4452.65
Experimental49.2949.8050.56

[back to top]

eGFR Values as Measured by MDRD

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Days 30, 60, and 180 post-transplantation

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Day 30Day 90Day 180
Control48.2048.9950.16
Experimental46.6447.1447.89

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Primary Non-Function (PNF), Defined as Dialysis-dependency for More Than 3 Months.

Post-transplant dialysis is sometimes required in the setting of kidney transplant. If such dialysis continues for more than 3 months, the participant is considered to have PNF and, as such, meets this endpoint definition. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Transplantation through at least month 3 up to month 24

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Experimental2.8
Control0.9

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between 3 Months and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 3 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 3 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 14 days was used for month 3 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 3 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental2.7
Control4.4

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between 3 Months and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 3 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 3 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 14 days was used for month 3 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 3 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental2.8
Control4.8

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between 6 Months and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 6 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 6 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental0.8
Control4.8

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between 6 Months and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 6 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 6 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental1.0
Control5.2

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between Post-transplant Nadir and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. Post-transplant nadir was defined as the lowest value of eGFR from the first 6 months post-transplant. The change in eGFR between nadir and month 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the nadir eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental8.5
Control12.0

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between Post-transplant Nadir and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. Post-transplant nadir was defined as the lowest value of eGFR from the first 6 months post-transplant. The change in eGFR between nadir and month 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the nadir eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental8.1
Control11.6

[back to top]

Creatinine Reduction Ratio (CRR), Defined as the First Creatinine on Day 2 Divided by he First Creatinine After Surgery

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 2 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 2 post-transplantation

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
Experimental24.28
Control20.97

[back to top]

Creatinine Reduction Ratio (CRR), Defined as the First Creatinine on Day 5 Divided by the First Creatinine After Surgery.

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 5 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 5 post-transplantation

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
Experimental47.06
Control43.37

[back to top]

Days From Transplantation Until Event (ACR, AMR, or Hospitalization for Infection and/or Malignancy)

Participants are considered to have met this endpoint if they experienced biopsy-proven T-cell mediated rejection (ACR) or antibody mediated rejection (AMR) based on central pathology reading or were hospitalized for infection and/or malignancy. For participants who met one or more of these three components, the earliest event date of the three components was used as the time of meeting the endpoint. Participants who did not meet any of the three components were censored at their last date of follow-up. Event (or censor) day was calculated as event (or censor) date minus transplant date. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionDays to event (Median)
Experimental642
Control613

[back to top]

Duration of Delayed Graft Function (DGF), Defined as Time From Transplantation to the Last Required Dialysis Treatment.

Participants are considered to have had DGF if they had at least one dialysis treatment in the first week post-transplant. For this endpoint, duration was calculated as the date of last post-transplant dialysis treatment minus the date of the first post-transplant dialysis treatment. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: First post-transplant dialysis treatment to last post-transplant dialysis treatment

InterventionDays (Mean)
Experimental13.27
Control15.74

[back to top]

eGFR Values as Measured by CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 7 post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental41.01
Control41.85

[back to top]

eGFR Values as Measured by MDRD

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 7 post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental38.93
Control39.96

[back to top]

Number of Dialysis Sessions.

The number of dialysis sessions a person had during their first 8 weeks post-transplant was used for this endpoint. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 8 weeks post-transplantation

InterventionDialysis sessions (Mean)
Experimental0.14
Control0.26

[back to top]

Percent of Participants That Required at Least One Dialysis Treatment.

Dialysis within the first week post-transplant is used in the setting of delayed graft function (DGF). Participants are considered to have had DGF if they had at least one dialysis treatment in the first week post-transplant. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 1 week post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental31.0
Control35.7

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Any Infection Requiring Hospitalization or Resulting in Death.

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had an infection that required hospitalization or resulted in death. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental43.0
Control39.3

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With BANFF Chronicity Scores > or Equal 2 on the 24 Month Biopsy.

The Banff 2013 classification involves scoring numerous characteristics of renal biopsy specimens. The ci (interstitial fibrosis) and ct (tubular atrophy) scores are two such characteristics. The scores can take values of 0, 1, 2, or 3 for each characteristic (ci and ct), indicating increasing severity of disease as the scores increase. Participants are considered to have met this endpoint if their ci + ct score on the 24 month biopsy summed to be > or equal to 2. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental73.1
Control36.4

[back to top]

BANFF Grades of First AMR.

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, or C4d staining positive. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Experimental0
Control0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Symptom Score on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)

"The mean change from baseline on study day 15 was calculated for total symptom scores assessed by physician. Total symptom scores are a composite of the following: rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness (congestion), nasal itching, sneezing, itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, redness of the eyes, and itching of the ears or palate scores. Physician scored each symptom during study visit at baseline and study day 15, on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), totaling to a composite score from 0-24 where a higher value indicates greater severity.~A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in symptom severity." (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and study day 15

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 15
Loratadine 10 mg15.9-6.2
MFNS 200 μg16.1-8.0
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg15.9-8.2
Placebo16.2-5.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (Assessed by Participant)

"Mean change from baseline (CFB), averaged over study days 1-15, is calculated for total symptom scores assessed by participants. Participants scored 8 symptoms (rhinorrhea; nasal stuffiness; nasal itching; sneezing; itching/burning eyes; tearing/watering eyes; eye redness; and ear/palate itching) in diaries on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Scores sum to a total symptom score (range: 0-24); higher values indicate greater severity. A decrease in symptom severity is reflected by a negative CFB.~CFB is the 15-day average score minus baseline score. Scores were recorded twice daily, in morning (AM) and night (PM). Average AM/PM scores are first calculated separately, then averaged together to compute the 15-day average score. If diary entries were missing, an average AM or PM score was not calculated. If neither average AM nor PM score was calculated, total 15-day average score was not calculated. Baseline score is an average of the three AM and three PM scores preceding treatment. (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and days 1 through 15 (average of 15 days of treatment)

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Days 1-15
Loratadine 10 mg14.4-3.8
MFNS 200 μg14.2-4.8
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg14.3-5.4
Placebo14.6-2.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)

"The mean change from baseline on study day 15 was calculated for total nasal symptom scores assessed by physician. Total nasal symptom scores are a composite of the following: rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness (congestion), nasal itching, and sneezing scores. Physician scored each symptom during study visit at baseline and study day 8, on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), totaling to a composite score from 0-12 where a higher value indicates greater severity.~A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in symptom severity." (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and study day 8

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 8
Loratadine 10 mg8.6-2.6
MFNS 200 μg8.6-3.6
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg8.7-3.7
Placebo8.8-2.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)

"The mean change from baseline on study day 15 was calculated for total nasal symptom scores assessed by physician. Total nasal symptom scores are a composite of the following: rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness (congestion), nasal itching, and sneezing scores. Physician scored each symptom during study visit at baseline and study day 15, on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), totaling to a composite score from 0-12 where a higher value indicates greater severity.~A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in symptom severity." (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and study day 15

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 15
Loratadine 10 mg8.6-3.1
MFNS 200 μg8.6-4.2
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg8.7-4.4
Placebo8.8-2.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (Assessed by Participant)

"Mean change from baseline (CFB), averaged over study days 1-15, is calculated for total nasal symptom scores assessed by participants. Participants scored 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea; nasal stuffiness; nasal itching; sneezing) in diaries on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Scores sum to a total nasal symptom score (range: 0-12); higher values indicate greater severity. A decrease in symptom severity is reflected by a negative CFB.~CFB is the 15-day average score minus baseline score. Scores were recorded twice daily, in morning (AM) and night (PM). Average AM/PM scores are first calculated separately, then averaged together to compute the 15-day average score. If diary entries were missing, an average AM or PM score was not calculated. If neither average AM nor PM score was calculated, total 15-day average score was not calculated. Baseline score is an average of the three AM and three PM scores preceding treatment." (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and days 1 through 15 (average of 15 days of treatment)

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Days 1-15
Loratadine 10 mg7.9-1.9
MFNS 200 μg7.8-2.7
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg7.9-3.0
Placebo8.0-1.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)

"The mean change from baseline on study day 8 was calculated for overall condition of rhinitis. Physicians scored participant rhinitis condition during study visit at baseline and study day 8, on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). A higher value indicates greater severity.~A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in symptom severity." (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and study day 8

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 8
Loratadine 10 mg2.3-0.5
MFNS 200 μg2.3-0.7
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg2.3-0.8
Placebo2.3-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)

"The mean change from baseline on study day 15 was calculated for overall condition of rhinitis. Physicians scored participant rhinitis condition during study visit at baseline and study day 15, on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). A higher value indicates greater severity.~A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in symptom severity." (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and study day 15

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 15
Loratadine 10 mg2.3-0.6
MFNS 200 μg2.3-0.9
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg2.3-0.9
Placebo2.3-0.6

[back to top]

Response to Therapy on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)

Mean response to therapy based on the participant's status relative to baseline. Physician scored participant's response on a scale from 1 (complete relief) to 5 (treatment failure) during study visit on study day 8. A higher value indicates weaker response. (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Study day 8

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg3.0
MFNS 200 μg3.1
Loratadine 10 mg3.4
Placebo3.6

[back to top]

Response to Therapy on Day 15 (Assessed by Physician)

Mean response to therapy based on the participant's status relative to baseline. Physician scored participant's response on a scale from 1 (complete relief) to 5 (treatment failure) during study visit on study day 15. A higher value indicates weaker response. (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Study day 15

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg2.8
MFNS 200 μg3.0
Loratadine 10 mg3.4
Placebo3.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Symptom Score on Day 8 (Assessed by Physician)

"The mean change from baseline on study day 8 was calculated for total symptom scores assessed by physician. Total symptom scores are a composite of the following: rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness (congestion), nasal itching, sneezing, itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, redness of the eyes, and itching of the ears or palate scores. Physician scored each symptom during study visit at baseline and study day 8, on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), totaling to a composite score from 0-24 where a higher value indicates greater severity.~A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in symptom severity." (NCT03855228)
Timeframe: Baseline and study day 8

,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline Day 8
Loratadine 10 mg15.9-5.2
MFNS 200 μg16.1-6.9
MFNS 200 μg + Loratadine 10 mg15.9-7.0
Placebo16.2-4.6

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Agreement of the Great Taste of the Product

"Participants were asked to response to question the product tastes great using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of the great taste." (NCT04162795)
Timeframe: Up to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Loratadine Chewable Tablet0.77

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Agreement of the Enjoyable Product Experience

"Participants were asked to response to question the product experience was enjoyable using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of the enjoyable experience." (NCT04162795)
Timeframe: Up to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Loratadine Chewable Tablet0.85

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Soothing Feeling on the Throat

"Participants were asked to response to question the product feels soothing on the throat using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of the soothing feeling." (NCT04162795)
Timeframe: Up to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Loratadine Chewable Tablet0.89

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Cooling Sensation

"Participants were asked to response to question the product provides a cooling sensation using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of perception of the sensation." (NCT04162795)
Timeframe: Up to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Loratadine Chewable Tablet0.99

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Liking the Flavor Sensation of the Product

"Participants were asked to response to question I like the flavor sensation of the product using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of liking the enjoyable flavor sensation." (NCT04162795)
Timeframe: Up to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Loratadine Chewable Tablet0.87

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Cooling Sensation Per Location

"Participants were asked to respond to question the product provides a cooling sensation in the mouth, nose or throat using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of perception of the sensation." (NCT04162795)
Timeframe: Up to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Cooling in MouthCooling in NoseCooling in Throat
Loratadine Chewable Tablet0.990.710.93

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Refreshing Sensation

"Participants were asked to response to question the product provides a refreshing sensation using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of perception of the sensation." (NCT04162795)
Timeframe: Up to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Refreshing...Refreshing in Mouth...Refreshing in Nose...Refreshing in Throat
Loratadine Chewable Tablet0.960.960.610.88

[back to top]

Time to Perception of Cooling Sensation

The mean time point at which cooling was initially perceived was claimed as the onset of cooling. The mean onsets of cooling sensation in the mouth, nose and throat were reported. (NCT04162795)
Timeframe: Up to 60 minutes post ingestion of study medication

InterventionSeconds (Mean)
Cooling in MouthCooling in NoseCooling in Throat
Loratadine Chewable Tablet5.8214.9716.17

[back to top]

Duration of Cooling Sensation

Participants who reported that they never experienced a cooling sensation were not included in the model. Those for whom the cooling sensation extended for 60 minutes or more were considered right-censored and were treated as such in the model. The median time of cooling sensation in the mouth, nose and throat was reported. Dispersion values were not calculated for this sensory study. (NCT04162795)
Timeframe: Up to 60 minutes post ingestion of study medication

InterventionMinutes (Median)
Cooling in MouthCooling in NoseCooling in the Throat
Loratadine Chewable Tablet202015

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Agreement of the Unique Sensory Experience for an Allergy Medicine

"Participants were asked to response to question the sensory experience is unique for an allergy medicine using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of the unique sensory experience sensation." (NCT04162795)
Timeframe: Up to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Loratadine Chewable Tablet0.94

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Agreement of the Refreshing of the Cooling Sensation

"Participants were asked to response to question the cooling sensation is refreshing using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of the refreshing of the cooling sensation." (NCT04162795)
Timeframe: Up to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Loratadine Chewable Tablet0.96

[back to top]

Pulmonary Function Measured by Spirometry: Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) / Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

"FEV1 is air volume exhaled in 1 second during spirometry. Forced vital capacity is the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. The change in FEV1/FVC was calculated between V1 (Baseline), V2 (Guideline Care - before intervention), and V3 (12 Months). This will be used as a measurement in asthma severity.~[A lower FEV1/FVC ratio indicates more severe asthma]" (NCT04179461)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

InterventionRatio (Median)
V1V2V3
Personalized Treatment0.810.80.8

[back to top]

Change in Composite Asthma Severity Index (CASI)

"CASI was measured by questionnaire and is a severity score of symptom burden, exacerbations, healthcare utilization, lung function and dose of inhaled corticosteroids. The change in CASI score was calculated between V1 (Baseline), V2 (Guideline Care - before intervention), and V3 (12 Months).~[The CASI score has a minimum value = 0, maximum value = 20, a higher score indicates greater asthma severity]" (NCT04179461)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
V1V2V3
Personalized Treatment555

[back to top]

Asthma Control Test (ACT)

"ACT was measured by questionnaire, assessing frequency of reported asthma symptoms, rescue medication use, the effect of asthma on daily functioning, and overall asthma control. The change in ACT score was calculated between V1 (Baseline), V2 (Guideline Care - before intervention), and V3 (12 Months).~[The ACT score has a minimum value = 5, maximum value = 25, a score 19 indicates well-controlled asthma]" (NCT04179461)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
V1V2V3
Personalized Treatment23.021.722.5

[back to top]

Adherence of Asthma Controller Medication

Adherence was measured using the Propeller Health Inhaler monitor and web-based software management platform that tracks adherence of asthma medications. The change in adherence was calculated between V1 (baseline) to V3 (12 Months). (NCT04179461)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of medication taken (Median)
V1V3
Personalized Treatment4236

[back to top]

Change in Maximum Eosinophil Count

Calculated by maximum eosinophils per esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) high-power field (eos/hpf) after therapy with antihistamines. As measured by the percentage of change in maximum eosinophil count from baseline to 12 weeks. (NCT04248712)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage change (Number)
Treatment Group0

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Number of adverse events reported (NCT04248712)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Treatment Group0

[back to top]