tacrolimus and Gram-Negative-Bacterial-Infections

This study investigates the potential pharmacokinetic interactions between an antimicrobial agent, moxifloxacin, and 2 immunosuppressant drugs, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, in kidney transplant recipients. Twenty-two kidney transplant patients needing antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infections are enrolled. Eleven patients are under cyclosporine treatment and the other 11 patients are under tacrolimus treatment. Because the urinary tract infections are caused by gram-negative aerobes sensitive to moxifloxacin, this antibiotic is administered by oral route at a dose of 400 mg/d for 1 week; in each patient pharmacokinetic studies are carried out before and at the seventh day of therapy. For both immunosuppressors, none of the pharmacokinetic parameters investigated show statistically significant differences between values obtained before and during treatment with moxifloxacin. In fact, the concentration-time profiles of monoclonal cyclosporine, polyclonal cyclosporine, and tacrolimus are not significantly different before and during the antimicrobial therapy. The results of the present study rule out interference of moxifloxacin with both cyclosporine and tacrolimus kinetics and indicate that the concomitant administration of the fluoroquinolone and cyclosporine or tacrolimus does not require modifications of the dosages of 2 immunosuppressant drugs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Infective Agents; Aza Compounds; Cyclosporine; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Moxifloxacin; Quinolines; Tacrolimus; Time Factors; Urinary Tract Infections

Gram-negative septic episodes are a potential risk of small-bowel transplantation; bacterial translocation through the graft is considered the mechanism. As a measure to prevent this complication, we evaluated postoperative selective bowel decontamination (SBD) in the rat model of orthotopic small-bowel transplantation [Lewis (LEW) and Brown-Norway (BN) rats as donors and recipients]. For 4 days after transplantation we gave FK 506, 2 mg/kg, which prevents rejection and results in indefinite recipient survival. For SBD, 24 mg/kg/day polymyxin E and 20 mg/kg/day tobramycin were administered via orogastric gavage to allograft recipients, both with and without FK 506 therapy. On Day 9, all rats were sacrificed, the peritoneal cavity was swabbed, and mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), spleen, liver, and ileum were harvested for microbial qualitative and quantitative analysis. Animals with positive peritoneal swab cultures were excluded. SBD resulted in a significant reduction of the quantitative gram-negative bacterial flora in the ileum and cecum and of bacterial translocation to the MLN [0% versus 50% (no FK 506 therapy) and 8% versus 50% (FK 506 treated)]. In the allograft groups not treated with FK 506, SBD failed to significantly prolong survival, suggesting that acute rejection is not hastened by infection (bacterial translocation). We conclude that SBD in small-bowel-graft recipients prevents bacterial translocation by reducing intestinal gram-negative bacterial flora; this may reduce local and systemic infections by gut-derived organisms.

Topics: Animals; Cell Movement; Colistin; Colony Count, Microbial; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Intestine, Small; Liver; Lymph Nodes; Mesentery; Postoperative Care; Rats; Rats, Inbred Lew; Spleen; Tacrolimus; Tobramycin