tacrolimus and Anti-Neutrophil-Cytoplasmic-Antibody-Associated-Vasculitis

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) has the propensity to acquire a devastating disease course. Despite the advances in therapeutics, a significant proportion of patients progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Renal transplantation is being increasingly employed in this population, with gradual improvement in outcomes over the years, however, recurrence of disease requires constant surveillance and is associated with graft failure. Areas covered: A structured literature search in PubMed and Medline and abstracts of international conferences was performed to identify cases and cohorts of AAV patients who had undergone renal transplantation for ESRD. The primary objective was to describe the long-term allograft and patient survival and to reflect on current trends in transplantation in AAV and provide recommendations for the phases of pre- and post-transplantation. Expert commentary: Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for AAV patients with ESRD. The risk of relapse is low with modern immunosuppressive regimes employing mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus. It is recommended that the vasculitis be in clinical remission for 12 months prior to transplantation. Although ANCA positivity is not a contraindication for renal transplantation, these patients should be monitored closely for vasculitis relapse post-transplant.

Topics: Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Graft Rejection; Humans; Immunosuppression Therapy; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Transplantation; Mycophenolic Acid; Survival Analysis; Tacrolimus; Treatment Outcome

Azathioprine (AZA), methotrexate, or rituximab is used for the maintenance therapy of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). Although the efficacy of tacrolimus (TAC) in various autoimmune diseases has been demonstrated, there have been few reports on the efficacy of TAC in AAV. We investigated the efficacy of TAC as maintenance therapy for AAV and compared its efficacy with that of AZA.We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 81 patients with AAV who received cyclophosphamide as induction therapy and AZA or TAC as maintenance therapy. All-cause death, relapse, and progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were analyzed.Among 81 patients with AAV, 69 patients received AZA alone, 6 patients received TAC alone, and 6 patients received TAC after AZA for maintenance therapy. Overall, 11 patients (13.6%) died, 30 patients (37.0%) experienced relapse, and 16 patients (19.8%) progressed to ESRD during a median of 33.8 months. No significant differences were observed in cumulative patients', relapse-free, and ESRD-free survival rates between patients administered AZA alone and TAC alone. There were no significant differences in the cumulative patients' and relapse-free survival rate between patients who received AZA alone and TAC after AZA. However, the cumulative ESRD-free survival rate was lower in patients who received TAC after AZA than in those who received AZA alone (P = .027).Patients who received TAC as maintenance therapy showed a higher incidence of ESRD than those who received AZA; however, this might be attributed to the lack of efficacy of AZA rather than the low ESRD prevention effect of TAC.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis; Azathioprine; Cyclophosphamide; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate; Tacrolimus