Page last updated: 2024-12-07

bendamustine hydrochloride

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Bendamustine hydrochloride is an alkylating agent used in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and other hematologic malignancies. It is a nitrogen mustard derivative that acts by binding to DNA and inhibiting cell replication. Bendamustine hydrochloride is synthesized through a multi-step process that involves the reaction of an aromatic amine with a chloroethylating agent. The compound is then reacted with hydrochloric acid to form the hydrochloride salt. Bendamustine hydrochloride has shown promising results in clinical trials for the treatment of CLL, Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is also being investigated for other types of cancer, such as multiple myeloma and breast cancer. The compound is well tolerated, but it can cause side effects such as nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and bone marrow suppression.'

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID77082
CHEMBL ID1201734
SCHEMBL ID18843
MeSH IDM0307744

Synonyms (111)

Synonym
bendamustine hydrochloride injection
unii-981y8sx18m
981y8sx18m ,
gamma(1-methyl-5-bis(beta-chloraethyl)aminobenzimidazoyl-2)buttersaeurehydrochlorid
bendamustine hydrochloride [usan:jan]
ribomustine
zimet 33/93
bendit
imet 3393
bendamustin hydrochloride
1h-benzimidazole-2-butanoic acid, 5-(bis(2-chloroethyl)amino)-1-methyl-, monohydrochloride
2-benzimidazolinebutryric acid, 1-methyl-5-bis(2-chloroethyl)amino-, hydrochloride
cytostasan
ccris 1864
2-benzimidazolebutyric acid, 5-(bis(2-chloroethyl)amino)-1-methyl-, monohydrochloride
nsc 138783
gamma(1-methyl-5-bis(beta-chloraethyl)aminobenzimidazoyl-2)buttersaeurehydrochlorid [german]
ribomustin (tn)
D07085
bendamustine hydrochloride (jan/usan)
3543-75-7
nsc138783
2-benzimidazolebutyric acid, monohydrochloride
2-benzimidazolinebutryric acid, hydrochloride
cytostosan
wln: t56 bn dnj b1 c3vq gn2g2g &gh
nsc-138783
treanda
bendamustine hydrochloride ,
sdx-105
ribomustin
symbenda
syb l-0501
benda
inno-p08001
treakisym
levact
innomustine
CHEMBL1201734
bendamustine hcl
vivimusta
sybl-0501
FT-0650624
FT-0696296
4-[5-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]-1-methylbenzimidazol-2-yl]butanoic acid hydrochloride
BCP9000390
97832-05-8
AKOS015951203
4-(5-(bis(2-chloroethyl)amino)-1-methyl-1h-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)butanoic acid hydrochloride
bendeka
BCPP000348
LP00623
bendamustine hydrochloride [usan]
bendamustine hydrochloride [mart.]
bendamustine hydrochloride [who-dd]
bendamustine hydrochloride [jan]
bendamustine hydrochloride [usp-rs]
bendamustine hydrochloride [orange book]
bendamustine hydrochloride [mi]
4-[5-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]-1-methyl-1h-benzimidazole-2-yl]butanoic acid monohydrochloride
bendamustine hydrochloride [usp monograph]
S1212
1h-benzimidazole-2-butanoicacid, 5-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]-1-methyl-, hydrochloride (1:?)
CCG-221927
HY-B0077
CS-1771
bendamustine (hydrochloride)
smr004234484
MLS006010156
B4033
1h-benzimidazole-2-butanoic acid, 5-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]-1-methyl-, hydrochloride (1:1)
AM20090666
5-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]-1-methylbenzimidazole-2-butyric acid hydrochloride
SCHEMBL18843
NCGC00261308-01
tox21_500623
ZHSKUOZOLHMKEA-UHFFFAOYSA-N
5-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]-1-methyl-1h-benzimidazole-2-butanoic acid hydrochloride
4-[5-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]-1-methylbenzimidazol-2-yl]butanoic acid;hydrochloride
hydrochloride, bendamustine
DTXSID40188912 ,
ep-3101
sdx-105 (cytostasane) hcl
AC-1619
mfcd01658758
bendamustine hcl (sdx-105, cytostasane)
3543-75-7 (hcl)
4-(5-(bis(2-chloroethyl)amino)-1-methyl-1h-benzo-[d]imidazol-2-yl)butanoic acid hydrochloride
SW219266-1
fmoc-(s)-3-amino-3-(3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-propionicacid
4-(5-(bis(2-chloroethyl)amino)-1-methylbenzimidazol-2-yl)butanoic acid hcl
AS-15856
BCP02107
SB17462
Q27272066
5-[bis(2-chloroethyl)-amino]-1-methyl-1h-benzimidazole-2-butanoic acid hydrochloride;ribomustin hcl
treanda hcl
BP-25399
4-(5-(bis(2-chloroethyl)amino)-1-methyl-1h-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)butanoicacidhydrochloride
BB164239
4-{5-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]-1-methyl-1h-1,3-benzodiazol-2-yl}butanoic acid hydrochloride
EN300-18586056
4-(5-(bis(2-chloroethyl)amino)-1-methyl-1h-benzimidazole-2-yl)butanoic acid monohydrochloride
belrapzo
bendamustine hydrochloride (mart.)
4-(5-(bis(2-chloroethyl)amino)-1-methyl-1h-benzoimidazol-2-yl)butanoic acid monohydrochloride
bendamustine hydrochloride (usp monograph)
bendamustine hydrochloride (usp-rs)
dtxcid00111403
cytostasan hydrochloride
Z2235802251

Research Excerpts

Overview

Bendamustine hydrochloride is an alkylating agent that was developed for the treatment of various human cancers. It is a novel cytotoxic agent that possesses alkylator and purine-like structural groups, which may confer a unique mechanism of action.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Bendamustine hydrochloride (BH) is a key therapeutic agent for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), while the mechanism underlying BH-resistance has not been verified."( Establishment and Characteristics of a Novel Mantle Cell Lymphoma-derived Cell Line and a Bendamustine-resistant Subline.
Chinen, Y; Fujibayashi, Y; Horiike, S; Kobayashi, T; Kuroda, J; Maegawa, S; Matsumura-Kimoto, Y; Mizuno, Y; Mizutani, S; Nagoshi, H; Shimura, Y; Takimoto-Shimomura, T; Taniwaki, M; Tsukamoto, T,
)
1.57
"Bendamustine hydrochloride is an alkylating agent that was developed for the treatment of various human cancers. "( An efficient and facile synthesis of deuterium-labeled anticancer agent bendamustine hydrochloride.
Liu, B; Qin, H; Zhang, Y, 2018
)
2.16
"Bendamustine hydrochloride is an alkylating antitumor agent with a good efficacy in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL). "( Determination and characterization of two degradant impurities in bendamustine hydrochloride drug product.
Chen, W; Ding, L; Li, X; Liao, M; Xu, X; Zhang, F; Zhang, L; Zou, L,
)
1.81
"Bendamustine hydrochloride is a novel cytotoxic agent that possesses alkylator and purine-like structural groups, which may confer a unique mechanism of action."( Bendamustine: a novel cytotoxic agent for hematologic malignancies.
Blumel, S; Dang, NH; Goodrich, A; Martin, C, 2008
)
1.07
"Bendamustine hydrochloride is a multifunctional, alkylating agent with a purine-like ring system that exhibits activity in multiple cancer models, including CLL and MCL, but whose mechanism is only partially described."( Bendamustine is effective in p53-deficient B-cell neoplasms and requires oxidative stress and caspase-independent signaling.
Campo, E; Colomer, D; López-Guerra, M; Milpied, P; Montserrat, E; Pérez-Galán, P; Roué, G; Villamor, N, 2008
)
1.07
"Bendamustine hydrochloride is a novel alkylating agent. "( Bendamustine is effective therapy in patients with rituximab-refractory, indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results from a Multicenter Study.
Bartlett, NL; Chen, L; Cheson, BD; Czuczman, MS; Ganjoo, K; Joyce, R; Kahl, BS; Leonard, JP; Robinson, KS; van der Jagt, RH; Williams, ME, 2010
)
1.8
"Bendamustine hydrochloride is a bifunctional alkylating agent that is not cross-resistant to other DNA-interacting substances including anthracyclines and oxazaphosphorines."( Bendamustine hydrochloride in patients with refractory soft tissue sarcoma: a noncomparative multicenter phase 2 study of the German sarcoma group (AIO-001).
Grünwald, V; Hartmann, JT; Horger, M; Huober, J; Käfer, G; Kanz, L; Mayer, F; Meisinger, I; Pintoffl, J; Schleicher, J, 2007
)
2.5
"Bendamustine hydrochloride is an alkylating agent with novel mechanisms of action. "( Bendamustine in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent and transformed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results from a phase II multicenter, single-agent study.
Bessudo, A; Camacho, ES; Chen, L; Cheson, BD; Cohen, P; Fayad, LE; Forero-Torres, A; Friedberg, JW; La Casce, AS; Oliver, JW; Robinson, KS; van der Jagt, RH; Williams, ME, 2008
)
1.79

Toxicity

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Considerable toxic side effects led to a dose reduction of cytostasan and adriamycin in 31 female patients without clinical efficiency loss."( [Therapeutic results and toxic side effects of the combination cytostasan, adriamycin and vincristine as second-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer].
Brockmann, B; Geschke, E; Kirchhof, I; Schmidt, UM, 1989
)
0.28
" CCNU in liposomes of different size and composition showed in lower doses a diminished therapeutic effectiveness in the P388 or L 1210 leukaemia and the B 16 melanoma, while in higher doses toxic deaths occurring with the free drug could be prevented totally by using liposomes."( Antineoplastic activity and toxicity of some alkylating cytostatics (cyclophosphamide, CCNU, cytostasan) encapsulated in liposomes in different murine tumour models.
Arndt, D; Fichtner, I; Reszka, R,
)
0.13
" First-line use of bendamustine is a safe option for CLL-patients requiring treatment, because bendamustine-owing to its unique pharmacodynamics-(1) is highly effective, (2) reasonably safe, and (3) does hardly produce cross-resistance against other anti-neoplastic drugs effective in this indication."( Phase-I/II study to evaluate dose limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, and tolerability of bendamustine HCl in pre-treated patients with B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (Binet stages B and C) requiring therapy.
Arnaudov, G; Lissitchkov, T; Merkle, Kh; Peytchev, D, 2006
)
0.33
" However, numerous adverse effects limited their use."( Optimization of the N-lost drugs melphalan and bendamustine: synthesis and cytotoxicity of a new set of dendrimer-drug conjugates as tumor therapeutic agents.
Gust, R; Scheffler, H; Scutaru, AM; Wenzel, M; Wolber, G, 2010
)
0.36
" In conclusion, the new BeEAM regimen is safe and effective for heavily pretreated lymphoma patients."( BeEAM (bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) before autologous stem cell transplantation is safe and effective for resistant/relapsed lymphoma patients.
Caballero, MD; Capria, S; Cuberli, F; Falcioni, S; Ferrara, F; Galieni, P; Gaudio, F; Gherlinzoni, F; Giardini, C; Gobbi, M; Isidori, A; Malerba, L; Meloni, G; Ocio, EM; Rocchi, M; Santoro, A; Sarina, B; Specchia, G; Stefani, PM; Visani, G, 2011
)
0.37
"Bendamustine is a safe and useful addition to the drug arsenal against lymphoproliferative disorders."( Preliminary experience with the use of bendamustine: a peculiar skin rash as the commonest side effect.
Ganesan, P; Malipatil, B; Sagar, TG; Sundersingh, S, 2011
)
0.37
" No life-threatening or unexpected adverse events occurred."( Efficacy and safety of bendamustine for the treatment of patients with recurring Hodgkin lymphoma.
Amore, A; Angrilli, F; Arcamone, M; Califano, C; Corazzelli, G; Cox, MC; D'Arco, A; De Filippi, R; Falorio, S; Ferrara, F; Guarini, A; Iannitto, E; Musto, P; Pinto, A; Stelitano, C; Storti, S, 2013
)
0.39
" Also, bendamustine can be regarded as a safe and effective alternative for patients with relapse after autologous transplantation and as an interesting cytoreductive strategy before allogeneic transplantation."( Safety and efficacy of single-agent bendamustine after failure of brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed or refractory hodgkin's lymphoma: experience with 27 patients.
Argnani, L; Broccoli, A; Cascavilla, N; Corradini, P; Hohaus, S; Merli, F; Motta, G; Tani, M; Vitolo, U; Viviani, S; Zinzani, PL, 2015
)
0.42
" The treatment was well tolerated, with rather infrequent adverse events and transient and manageable toxicities."( Safety and efficacy of single-agent bendamustine after failure of brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed or refractory hodgkin's lymphoma: experience with 27 patients.
Argnani, L; Broccoli, A; Cascavilla, N; Corradini, P; Hohaus, S; Merli, F; Motta, G; Tani, M; Vitolo, U; Viviani, S; Zinzani, PL, 2015
)
0.42
" Main non-hematologic adverse events were nausea (69 %), fatigue (56 %), decreased appetite (42 %), constipation (38 %), diarrhea (36 %), vomiting (36 %), and decreased weight (31 %)."( Phase II study of bendamustine combined with rituximab in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: efficacy, tolerability, and safety findings.
Czuczman, MS; Goy, A; Graf, DA; Lamonica, D; Munteanu, MC; van der Jagt, RH, 2015
)
0.42
" The good tolerability and feasibility of bendamustine with and without rituximab, in particular for the elderly population with CLL argues for it being a safe outpatient treatment."( Bendamustin-Rituximab Combination Is a Safe and Effective, Ambulatory Treatment for Elderly Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Retrospective Real-world Analysis by Age from a German Registry and Review of the Literature.
Günther, G; Kersting, M; Kleeberg, UR; Linde, H; Tessen, HW, 2016
)
0.43
" All patients experienced at least one adverse event during induction, most commonly infusion-related reactions (58%), the majority of which were grade 1/2."( Safety and efficacy of obinutuzumab with CHOP or bendamustine in previously untreated follicular lymphoma.
Díaz, MG; Dreyling, M; Dyer, MJ; Grigg, A; Knapp, A; Lei, G; Marlton, P; Rule, S; Wassner-Fritsch, E, 2017
)
0.46
"Adverse events (AEs) captured from 12 quarterly postmarketing periodic adverse drug experience reports spanning 2008-2015 were included and summarized."( Long-term safety experience with bendamustine for injection in a real-world setting.
Barr, PM; James, L; Kahl, B; Martin, P; Pathak, A, 2017
)
0.46
"Adverse events that resulted in label updates included Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, extravasation, secondary neoplasm, and drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms."( Long-term safety experience with bendamustine for injection in a real-world setting.
Barr, PM; James, L; Kahl, B; Martin, P; Pathak, A, 2017
)
0.46
" Rapid BDM infusions were safe and tolerable for cancer patients in this study."( Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Bendamustine Rapid-Infusion Formulation.
Anthony, SP; Chanas, B; Cheung, EM; Edenfield, WJ; Hepner, A; Mattar, B; Mutch, PJ; Smith, M, 2017
)
0.46
" A less toxic regimen might improve the outcome of patients with lymphoma after transplantation."( High-dose Bendamustine-EAM followed by autologous stem cell rescue results in long-term remission rates in lymphoma patients, without renal toxicity.
Boehm, A; Keil, F; Koller, E; Menschel, E; Moestl, M; Noesslinger, T; Panny, M; Simanek, R, 2018
)
0.48
" Outcomes were number of responders to treatment, remission rate of treatment responders, overall probability of 5-year remission, and the occurrence of adverse events."( Corticosteroids in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy : A retrospective, multicentre study, comparing efficacy and safety of daily prednisolone, pulsed dexamethasone, and pulsed intravenous methylprednisolone.
Basta, I; Doneddu, PE; Eftimov, F; Gallia, F; Nikolic, A; Nobile-Orazio, E; Peric, S; van Lieverloo, GGA; van Schaik, IN; Verhamme, C; Wieske, L, 2018
)
0.48
" Adverse events leading to a change in treatment occurred in ten patients (8%)."( Corticosteroids in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy : A retrospective, multicentre study, comparing efficacy and safety of daily prednisolone, pulsed dexamethasone, and pulsed intravenous methylprednisolone.
Basta, I; Doneddu, PE; Eftimov, F; Gallia, F; Nikolic, A; Nobile-Orazio, E; Peric, S; van Lieverloo, GGA; van Schaik, IN; Verhamme, C; Wieske, L, 2018
)
0.48
" Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 80."( Safety of obinutuzumab alone or combined with chemotherapy for previously untreated or relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the phase IIIb GREEN study.
Aktan, M; Bosch, F; Dartigeas, C; Ferra Coll, CM; Foà, R; Gresko, E; Kisro, J; Leblond, V; Merot, JL; Montillo, M; Raposo, J; Robson, S; Stilgenbauer, S, 2018
)
0.48
" Obinutuzumab exposure was not associated with occurrence or severity of adverse events, but higher exposure appeared to be associated with greater efficacy, particularly longer progression-free survival."( Pharmacokinetics, exposure, efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab in rituximab-refractory follicular lymphoma patients in the GADOLIN phase III study.
Brewster, M; Buchheit, V; Fingerle-Rowson, G; Frey, N; Gibiansky, E; Gibiansky, L; Jamois, C, 2019
)
0.51
" The selected obinutuzumab dosing regimen offers clinical benefit in a majority of rituximab-refractory FL patients treated with bendamustine, irrespective of variability in exposure, whilst minimising adverse events."( Pharmacokinetics, exposure, efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab in rituximab-refractory follicular lymphoma patients in the GADOLIN phase III study.
Brewster, M; Buchheit, V; Fingerle-Rowson, G; Frey, N; Gibiansky, E; Gibiansky, L; Jamois, C, 2019
)
0.51
" Among the adverse events associated with the earlier termination of bendamustine treatment, infections were the most common (20."( Safety and Efficacy of Bendamustine Monotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Polish Lymphoma Research Group Real-Life Analysis.
Bramowicz-Jarosz, B; Długosz-Danecka, M; Graboś-Michalak, J; Hus, I; Kopacz, A; Krochmalczyk, D; Malenda, A; Piotrowska, M; Potoczek, S; Raźny, M; Seweryn, M; Soroka-Wojtaszko, M; Szymczyk, A; Wąsik-Szczepanek, E; Wichary, R; Wołowiec, D; Zawirska, D, 2019
)
0.51
" Treatment-related adverse event was observed in 95."( Efficacy and safety of ofatumumab and bendamustine followed by ofatumumab maintenance in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma after prior rituximab.
Boyd, TE; Cannan, M; Fellague-Chebra, R; Feng, X; Kingsley, E; Lyons, RM; Moezi, M; Richards, D; Sharman, J; Shtivelband, M, 2021
)
0.62
"Limited published real-world data describe adverse events (AEs) among patients treated for mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL)."( Adverse Events and Economic Burden Among Patients Receiving Systemic Treatment for Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study.
Byfield, SD; Kabadi, SM; LE, L; Olufade, T, 2021
)
0.62
" At the final analysis, no new safety signals were observed [Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs): 1L 82·7%, R/R 84·5%; serious AEs: 1L 58·1%, R/R 62·5%]."( Safety and efficacy of obinutuzumab alone or with chemotherapy in previously untreated or relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients: Final analysis of the Phase IIIb GREEN study.
Bosch, F; Böttcher, S; Foà, R; Ilhan, O; Kisro, J; Leblond, V; Mahé, B; Mikuskova, E; Osmanov, D; Perretti, T; Reda, G; Robinson, S; Stilgenbauer, S; Tausch, E; Trask, P; Turgut, M; Van Hoef, M; Wójtowicz, M, 2021
)
0.62
"Most data on overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are from controlled trials; therefore, in this population-based study, we retrospectively assessed treatment patterns, OS, and AEs in MCL patients initiating systemic treatment during 2013-2015 using the United States Medicare claims database."( Real-world evidence on survival, adverse events, and health care burden in Medicare patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Davis, K; Du, XL; Goyal, RK; Jain, P; Kabadi, SM; Kaye, JA; Le, H; Nagar, SP; Wang, M, 2021
)
0.62
"Ibrutinib has superior progression-free survival compared with bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in older CLL patients, however, differences in treatment duration, six monthly BR cycles versus continuous ibrutinib, complicate adverse event (AE) comparisons."( Adverse event burden in older patients with CLL receiving bendamustine plus rituximab or ibrutinib regimens: Alliance A041202.
Abramson, JS; Bartlett, NL; Booth, AM; Brander, DM; Brown, JR; Byrd, JC; Coutre, S; Ding, W; Erba, H; Kuzma, CS; Larson, RA; Little, RF; Litzow, M; Mandrekar, SJ; Nattam, S; Owen, C; Ruppert, AS; Smith, SE; Stone, RM; Woyach, JA, 2021
)
0.62
" Grade 5 (fatal) adverse events (AEs) were reported in 5 patients."( Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab with obinutuzumab and bendamustine in previously untreated follicular lymphoma.
Burke, JM; Diefenbach, C; Ferrari, S; Gilbertson, M; Khan, C; Nielsen, TG; Raval, A; Sellam, G; Sharman, JP; Shivhare, M; Tani, M; Ujjani, C; Vitolo, U; Younes, A; Yuen, S, 2022
)
0.72
" We observed significant differences, however, in the frequency and severity of adverse events."( Bendamustine is safe and effective for lymphodepletion before tisagenlecleucel in patients with refractory or relapsed large B-cell lymphomas.
Ballard, HJ; Barta, SK; Chen, AI; Chong, EA; Garfall, A; Gerson, JN; Ghilardi, G; Gier, S; Hodges Dwinal, A; Jäger, U; Landsburg, JD; Maziarz, RT; Myers, J; Napier, E; Nasta, SD; Pajarillo, R; Porter, DL; Ruella, M; Schachter, L; Schuster, SJ; Svoboda, J; Victoriano, D; Weber, E; Williamson, S; Wohlfarth, P; Yelton, R, 2022
)
0.72
" The most common adverse effects were febrile neutropenia (98%), mucositis (72%) and colitis (60%)."( Single-center retrospective study assessing the efficacy and safety of BeEAM (bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) as conditioning regimen for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Boudreault, JS; Feng, X; Plante, MÉ,
)
0.13
" Although this treatment is effective, it comes at the cost of severe long-term adverse events, such as reduced fertility and an increased risk of secondary cancers."( Nivolumab plus Brentuximab vedotin +/- bendamustine combination therapy: a safe and effective treatment in pediatric recurrent and refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma.
Beishuizen, A; Boes, M; Diez, C; Greve, P; Hagleitner, M; Loeffen, J; Meyer-Wentrup, F; Peperzak, V; Veening, M, 2023
)
0.91
" Only one adverse event of CTCAE grade 3 or higher due to nivolumab + BV was identified."( Nivolumab plus Brentuximab vedotin +/- bendamustine combination therapy: a safe and effective treatment in pediatric recurrent and refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma.
Beishuizen, A; Boes, M; Diez, C; Greve, P; Hagleitner, M; Loeffen, J; Meyer-Wentrup, F; Peperzak, V; Veening, M, 2023
)
0.91

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The pharmacokinetic profiles of bendamustine and active metabolites were defined in patients with rituximab-refractory, relapsed indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and supported understanding of exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety."( Bendamustine pharmacokinetic profile and exposure-response relationships in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
D'Andrea, D; Darwish, M; Kahl, B; Melhem, M; Owen, JS; Passarell, JA, 2010
)
0.36
" Pharmacokinetic models were developed, with covariate assessment."( Bendamustine pharmacokinetic profile and exposure-response relationships in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
D'Andrea, D; Darwish, M; Kahl, B; Melhem, M; Owen, JS; Passarell, JA, 2010
)
0.36
" Bendamustine was rapidly eliminated, with a mean elimination half-life (t(1/2) ) of 29 min."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of bendamustine hydrochloride in relapsed or refractory indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma.
Ando, K; Kasai, M; Matsumoto, Y; Ogawa, Y; Ogura, M; Ohmachi, K; Shimizu, D; Taniwaki, M; Tobinai, K; Uchida, T; Watanabe, T; Yokoyama, H, 2010
)
0.63
" Secondary endpoints were adverse events (AE), the overall response rate (ORR), and pharmacokinetic parameters."( Feasibility and pharmacokinetic study of bendamustine hydrochloride in combination with rituximab in relapsed or refractory aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Ando, K; Matsumoto, Y; Ogura, M; Ohmachi, K; Taniwaki, M; Tobinai, K; Uchida, T; Watanabe, T, 2011
)
0.64
"The authors present the chemical structure, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical application of bendamustine in hematological malignancies."( Pharmacokinetic evaluation and therapeutic activity of bendamustine in B-cell lymphoid malignancies.
Korycka-Wołowiec, A; Robak, T, 2012
)
0.38
" Bendamustine clearance from plasma was rapid, with a half-life of ~40 minutes."( Pharmacokinetics and excretion of 14C-bendamustine in patients with relapsed or refractory malignancy.
Beijnen, JH; Bond, M; D'Andrea, D; Darwish, M; Dubbelman, AC; Hellriegel, E; Robertson, P; Rosing, H; Schellens, JH, 2013
)
0.39
" This validated method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study enrolling 10 Chinese patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia administered a single intravenous infusion of 100 mg m(2) bendamustine hydrochloride."( Simultaneous determination of bendamustine and its active metabolite, gamma-hydroxy-bendamustine in human plasma and urine using HPLC-fluorescence detector: application to a pharmacokinetic study in Chinese cancer patients.
Cheng, H; Cheng, Z; Xie, F; Yu, P, 2014
)
0.58
"The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of bendamustine has been characterized in adults with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), but remains to be elucidated in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of bendamustine in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory acute leukemia.
Bond, M; Darwish, M; Grasela, T; Hellriegel, E; Megason, G; Phillips, L; Robertson, P, 2014
)
0.4
" Model-predicted mean Cmax and area under the curve values from time 0-24 h were 6806 ng/mL and 8240 ng*h/mL, respectively."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of bendamustine in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory acute leukemia.
Bond, M; Darwish, M; Grasela, T; Hellriegel, E; Megason, G; Phillips, L; Robertson, P, 2014
)
0.4
" Despite the extensive experience with bendamustine, its pharmacokinetic profile has only recently been described."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of bendamustine and its metabolites.
Bond, M; Chovan, JP; Darwish, M; Hellriegel, E; Robertson, P, 2015
)
0.42
"A literature search and data on file (including a human mass balance study, pharmacokinetic population analyses in adult and pediatric patients, and modeling analyses) were evaluated for inclusion."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of bendamustine and its metabolites.
Bond, M; Chovan, JP; Darwish, M; Hellriegel, E; Robertson, P, 2015
)
0.42
" Serial pharmacokinetic samples were collected and were analysed for the circulatory levels of bendamustine and its M3 metabolite."( Infusion Rate Dependent Pharmacokinetics of Bendamustine with Altered Formation of γ-hydroxybendamustine (M3) Metabolite Following 30- and 60-min Infusion of Bendamustine in Rats.
Bhamdipati, RK; Devaraj, VC; Mullangi, R; Richter, W; Srinivas, NR; Suresh, PS, 2016
)
0.43
" No clinically relevant differences in other evaluated pharmacokinetic parameters were found."( Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Bendamustine Rapid-Infusion Formulation.
Anthony, SP; Chanas, B; Cheung, EM; Edenfield, WJ; Hepner, A; Mattar, B; Mutch, PJ; Smith, M, 2017
)
0.46
" Here, we describe the pharmacokinetic (PK) observations, along with modeling to further explore the interaction between ibrutinib and rituximab."( Systemic Exposure of Rituximab Increased by Ibrutinib: Pharmacokinetic Results and Modeling Based on the HELIOS Trial.
Avigdor, A; Bartlett, N; Cramer, P; de Jong, J; De Nicolao, G; Demirkan, F; Dilhuydy, MS; Fraser, G; Ganguly, S; Goy, A; Howes, A; Lavezzi, SM; Loscertales, J; Mahler, M; Neyens, M; Poggesi, I; Rule, S; Salman, M; Samoilova, O, 2019
)
0.51
"Using a previously described population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of obinutuzumab in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and CLL, we conducted an exposure-response analysis using data from 6 clinical trials in patients with CD20+ B-cell malignancies (CLL11, GADOLIN, GATHER, GAUDI, GAUGUIN and GAUSS) to describe the PK properties of obinutuzumab, identify covariates influencing exposure, and explore how exposure affects safety, efficacy and pharmacodynamics."( Pharmacokinetics, exposure, efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab in rituximab-refractory follicular lymphoma patients in the GADOLIN phase III study.
Brewster, M; Buchheit, V; Fingerle-Rowson, G; Frey, N; Gibiansky, E; Gibiansky, L; Jamois, C, 2019
)
0.51

Compound-Compound Interactions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Because of its efficacy and low toxicity, bendamustine in combination with rituximab may be an alternative treatment for aggressive lymphomas in old patients not eligible for R-CHOP."( Phase II study of bendamustine in combination with rituximab as first-line treatment in patients 80 years or older with aggressive B-cell lymphomas.
Al-Batran, SE; Atmaca, A; Fauth, F; Jäger, E; Neumann, A; Pauligk, C; Weidmann, E, 2011
)
0.37
" The present dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of bendamustine hydrochloride in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory, CD20-positive, aggressive B-NHL."( Feasibility and pharmacokinetic study of bendamustine hydrochloride in combination with rituximab in relapsed or refractory aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Ando, K; Matsumoto, Y; Ogura, M; Ohmachi, K; Taniwaki, M; Tobinai, K; Uchida, T; Watanabe, T, 2011
)
0.86
"The objective of this trial was to evaluate safety and efficacy of bendamustine combined with rituximab (BR) in patients with relapsed and/or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)."( Bendamustine combined with rituximab in patients with relapsed and/or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a multicenter phase II trial of the German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group.
Bahlo, J; Böttcher, S; Bühler, A; Busch, R; Cramer, P; Döhner, H; Eckart, MJ; Eichhorst, BF; Elter, T; Fischer, K; Goede, V; Hallek, M; Kiehl, M; Kneba, M; Kranz, G; Schweighofer, CD; Staib, P; Stilgenbauer, S; Wendtner, CM; Winkler, D, 2011
)
0.37
" Bendamustine was administered at a dose of 70 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 combined with rituximab 375 mg/m(2) on day 0 of the first course and 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 during subsequent courses for up to six courses."( Bendamustine combined with rituximab in patients with relapsed and/or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a multicenter phase II trial of the German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group.
Bahlo, J; Böttcher, S; Bühler, A; Busch, R; Cramer, P; Döhner, H; Eckart, MJ; Eichhorst, BF; Elter, T; Fischer, K; Goede, V; Hallek, M; Kiehl, M; Kneba, M; Kranz, G; Schweighofer, CD; Staib, P; Stilgenbauer, S; Wendtner, CM; Winkler, D, 2011
)
0.37
" Its favorable toxicity profile in-vivo favors its combination with other cytotoxic drugs."( The cytotoxic effects of bendamustine in combination with cytarabine in mantle cell lymphoma cell lines.
Albiero, E; Bernardi, M; Castegnaro, S; Chieregato, K; Madeo, D; Rodeghiero, F; Visco, C; Zanon, C, 2012
)
0.38
" Bendamustine was administered at a dose of 90 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 combined with 375 mg/m(2) rituximab on day 0 of the first course and 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 during subsequent courses for up to six courses."( Bendamustine in combination with rituximab for previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a multicenter phase II trial of the German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group.
Bahlo, J; Böttcher, S; Bühler, A; Busch, R; Cramer, P; Döhner, H; Eichhorst, BF; Fink, AM; Fischer, K; Goede, V; Hallek, M; Isfort, S; Kneba, M; Kreuzer, KA; Pflüger, KH; Ritgen, M; Schott, S; Schubert, J; Staib, P; Stilgenbauer, S; von Tresckow, J; Wendtner, CM; Winkler, D, 2012
)
0.38
"We conducted a phase II, noncomparative, open-label, multicenter GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto) study (CLL0809) to assess the efficacy and safety of bendamustine in combination with ofatumumab (BendOfa) in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)."( Bendamustine in combination with ofatumumab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a GIMEMA Multicenter Phase II Trial.
Angelucci, E; Cascavilla, N; Chiarenza, A; Cortelezzi, A; Cuneo, A; Fabris, S; Foà, R; Giannarelli, D; Gobbi, M; Gritti, G; Guarini, A; Laurenti, L; Liberati, AM; Marasca, R; Mauro, FR; Morabito, F; Neri, A; Orsucci, L; Piciocchi, A; Reda, G; Rossi, D; Sciumè, M; Storti, S; Vignetti, M; Vincenti, D; Zaja, F, 2014
)
0.4
" This analysis investigated the potential for drug-drug interactions between the drugs in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma or mantle cell lymphoma."( An evaluation of the potential for drug-drug interactions between bendamustine and rituximab in indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma.
Bond, M; Burke, JM; Darwish, M; Hellriegel, E; Ludwig, E; Munteanu, MC; Phillips, L; Robertson, P, 2014
)
0.4
" This study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of otlertuzumab administered in combination with rituximab and bendamustine to patients with relapsed, indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)."( Phase 1b study of otlertuzumab (TRU-016), an anti-CD37 monospecific ADAPTIR™ therapeutic protein, in combination with rituximab and bendamustine in relapsed indolent lymphoma patients.
Bellam, N; Eisenfeld, AJ; Feldman, T; Gopal, AK; Goy, A; Green, DJ; Griffin, M; Mato, AR; Stromatt, SC; Tarantolo, SR, 2014
)
0.4
"Otlertuzumab in combination with rituximab and bendamustine was well tolerated and induced responses in the majority of patients with relapsed indolent B-NHL."( Phase 1b study of otlertuzumab (TRU-016), an anti-CD37 monospecific ADAPTIR™ therapeutic protein, in combination with rituximab and bendamustine in relapsed indolent lymphoma patients.
Bellam, N; Eisenfeld, AJ; Feldman, T; Gopal, AK; Goy, A; Green, DJ; Griffin, M; Mato, AR; Stromatt, SC; Tarantolo, SR, 2014
)
0.4
" In the present protocol, bortezomib was combined with bendamustine and prednisone, in order to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed/untreated MM."( Bendamustine and prednisone in combination with bortezomib (BPV) in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed/untreated multiple myeloma.
Andrea, M; Becker, C; Behre, G; Bourgeois, M; Edelmann, T; Gutsche, K; Hammerschmidt, D; Hennig, E; Heyn, S; Hoffmann, FA; Holzvogt, B; Kaiser, T; Krahl, R; Kreibich, U; Lindner, T; Niederwieser, D; Plötze, M; Pönisch, W; Reifenrath, K; Remane, Y; Schliwa, T; Schwarz, M; Schwarzer, A; Vucinic, V; Winkelmann, C; Zehrfeld, T, 2014
)
0.4
" Bendamustine was administered with a cumulative dose of up to 200 mg/m(2)."( Bendamustine in combination with thalidomide and dexamethasone is a viable salvage option in myeloma relapsed and/or refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide.
Aitchison, R; Blesing, N; Lau, IJ; Peniket, A; Rabin, N; Ramasamy, K; Roberts, P; Smith, D; Yong, K, 2015
)
0.42
"BENDA used either alone or in combination with RIT strongly induced apoptosis as well as enhanced expression of selected apoptotic proteins, especially those involved in the intrinsic apoptotic pathway: P53, PUMA and BAX, which cause mitochondrial transmembrane potential changes leading to activation of caspase-9 and -3."( Cytotoxic and apoptosis-inducing effects of bendamustine used alone and in combination with rituximab on chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells in vitro.
Blonski, JZ; Cebula-Obrzut, B; Korycka-Wolowiec, A; Robak, T; Smolewski, P; Wolowiec, D; Ziolkowska, E, 2014
)
0.4
"Between Sept 19, 2012, and Jan 21, 2014, 578 eligible patients were randomly assigned to ibrutinib or placebo in combination with bendamustine plus rituximab (289 in each group)."( Ibrutinib combined with bendamustine and rituximab compared with placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab for previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (HELIOS): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Avigdor, A; Balasubramanian, S; Bartlett, NL; Chanan-Khan, A; Cramer, P; Demirkan, F; Dilhuydy, MS; Fraser, G; Goy, A; Grosicki, S; Hallek, M; Howes, A; Janssens, A; Karlsson, C; Loscertales, J; Mahler, M; Mato, A; Mayer, J; Panagiotidis, P; Pavlovsky, MA; Phelps, C; Pristupa, A; Pylypenko, H; Rule, S; Salman, M; Samoilova, O; Silva, RS; Sun, S; Villa, D, 2016
)
0.43
"This phase Ib, dose-escalation study investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of the pan-class I phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor voxtalisib [30 or 50 mg twice daily (BID)], in combination with rituximab (voxtalisib+rituximab) or rituximab plus bendamustine (voxtalisib+rituximab+bendamustine), in relapsed or refractory indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL)."( Phase Ib trial of the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor voxtalisib (SAR245409) in combination with chemoimmunotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies.
Awan, FT; Costa, LJ; Gao, L; Gore, L; Lager, J; Sharma, J, 2016
)
0.43
"Bendamustine in combination with rituximab (BR) has been associated with high response rates and acceptable toxicity in older patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)."( A phase II trial of bendamustine in combination with rituximab in older patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Asch, AS; Deal, AM; Foster, MC; Grover, NS; Ivanova, A; Muss, HB; Olajide, O; Park, SI; Richards, KL; Shea, TC; Sobol, AL; Wall, JG, 2016
)
0.43
" We aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of the Akt inhibitor MK-2206 in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) in relapsed and/or refractory CLL in a phase I/II study."( Akt inhibitor MK-2206 in combination with bendamustine and rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Results from the N1087 alliance study.
Bowen, D; Boysen, J; Call, T; Conte, M; Ding, W; Erlichman, C; Habermann, TM; Hanson, C; Jelinek, D; Kay, NE; LaPlant, B; Larsen, JT; Leis, JF; Lesnick, C; Nikcevich, D; Pettinger, A; Reeder, C; Secreto, C; Shanafelt, TD; Tschumper, R, 2017
)
0.46
"To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of obinutuzumab in combination with bendamustine followed by obinituzumab maintenance (Obin-Benda) compared to bendamustine alone (Benda) in patients with refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) in a Norwegian setting."( Cost-Effectiveness of Obinutuzumab in Combination with Bendamustine Followed by Obinutuzumab Maintenance versus Bendamustine Alone in Treatment of Patients with Rituximab-Refractory Follicular Lymphoma in Norway.
Haukaas, FS; Krivasi, T; Ohna, A, 2018
)
0.48
" The results of the analysis indicate that obinutuzumab in combination with bendamustine followed by obinutuzumab maintenance may be cost-effective compared to bendamustine alone in Norway."( Cost-Effectiveness of Obinutuzumab in Combination with Bendamustine Followed by Obinutuzumab Maintenance versus Bendamustine Alone in Treatment of Patients with Rituximab-Refractory Follicular Lymphoma in Norway.
Haukaas, FS; Krivasi, T; Ohna, A, 2018
)
0.48
" Newly diagnosed patients are treated with rituximab in combination with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy, but a significant number of patients relapse after initial treatment."( Polatuzumab vedotin to treat relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, in combination with bendamustine plus rituximab.
Amaya, ML; Jimeno, A; Kamdar, M, 2020
)
0.56
" However, the efficacy and underlying toxicity of these hybrids in combination with other agents remain unclear."( Novel SAHA‑bendamustine hybrid NL‑101 in combination with daunorubicin synergistically suppresses acute myeloid leukemia.
Guo, W; Huang, J; Huang, S; Huang, X; Jin, J; Li, F; Li, X; Ling, Q; Pan, J; Ye, W, 2020
)
0.56
" In a monocentric cohort of 68 SMLZ patients, we showed that rituximab in monotherapy or in combination with bendamustine, compared with rituximab associated with the polychemotherapy cycle cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP), resulted in a higher 5-year progression-free survival (91."( Rituximab Monotherapy or in Combination with Bendamustine Is Not Inferior to Rituximab-CHOP Regimen in the Treatment of Patients with Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma in the Real Life.
Cabras, MG; Caocci, G; Dessì, D; La Nasa, G; Mantovani, D; Moi, G; Mulas, O, 2021
)
0.62
"The protocol followed a 3+3 design of carfilzomib dose escalation combined with standard doses of bendamustine and rituximab."( Carfilzomib in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Phase I Trial.
Ai, WZ; Andreadis, CB; Aoun, C; Castillo, M; Cavallone, E; Crawford, E; Fakhri, B; Kambhampati, S; Kaplan, LD; Le, D; Martinelli, M; Padilla, M; Reiner, J; Sudhindra, A; Ta, T; Tuscano, JM; Wieduwilt, MJ, 2021
)
0.62
"Carfilzomib in combination with bendamustine and rituximab is a safe and well-tolerated treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma."( Carfilzomib in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Phase I Trial.
Ai, WZ; Andreadis, CB; Aoun, C; Castillo, M; Cavallone, E; Crawford, E; Fakhri, B; Kambhampati, S; Kaplan, LD; Le, D; Martinelli, M; Padilla, M; Reiner, J; Sudhindra, A; Ta, T; Tuscano, JM; Wieduwilt, MJ, 2021
)
0.62
" Brentuximab vedotin (BV) in combination with bendamustine may represent a suitable salvage therapy; data on 32 patients aged less than 25 years were retrospectively analyzed."( Brentuximab vedotin in combination with bendamustine in pediatric patients or young adults with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.
Buffardi, S; De Vito, R; Del Bufalo, F; Di Matteo, A; Di Ruscio, V; Locatelli, F; Mariggiò, E; Paganelli, V; Pagliara, D; Parasole, R; Petruzziello, F; Stocchi, F; Strocchio, L; Vinti, L, 2022
)
0.72
" The monitoring of serum IgG during chemotherapy may help to predict the development of infection in blood cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with bendamustine in combination with rituximab."( Serum immunoglobulin G as a discriminator of infection in follicular lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy with bendamustine in combination with rituximab.
Choi, I; Hirata, A; Hirata, K; Miyashita, K; Nakashima, E; Narazaki, T; Ohno, H; Suehiro, Y; Tachikawa, Y; Taguchi, K; Tanaka, T; Utsunomiya, H, 2022
)
0.72
" Ofatumumab PK concentration profiles and parameters were similar, alone or in combination with bendamustine."( Phase 1 Study Evaluating Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Ofatumumab Combined With Bendamustine in Patients With Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
Chandler, JC; Davis, J; Forero-Torres, A; Hoever, P; Iyer, SP; Izquierdo, M; Kanate, AS; Madan, S; Quinlan, M, 2022
)
0.72
"Venetoclax in combination with obinutuzumab has significantly improved efficacy versus immunochemotherapy (progression-free survival) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia who have not  received prior treatment."( Cost-utility analysis of venetoclax in combination with obinutuzumab as first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in Spain.
De la Serna-Torroba, J; Escudero-Vilaplana, V; Hernández-Rivas, JÁ; Moreno-Martínez, E; Sánchez-Cuervo, M; Sánchez-Hernández, R, 2022
)
0.72
"Venetoclax in combination with obinutuzumab was shown to be a  dominant alternative compared to the rest of the treatment alternatives, with a  lower cost per patient (€-67,869 compared to chlorambucil in combination  with obinutuzumab, €-375,952 compared to ibrutinib, €-61,996 compared to  fludarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide and rituximab, and €- 77,398 compared to bendamustine in combination with rituximab)."( Cost-utility analysis of venetoclax in combination with obinutuzumab as first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in Spain.
De la Serna-Torroba, J; Escudero-Vilaplana, V; Hernández-Rivas, JÁ; Moreno-Martínez, E; Sánchez-Cuervo, M; Sánchez-Hernández, R, 2022
)
0.72
"Venetoclax in combination with obinutuzumab is an efficient and  dominant alternative for treating previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia compared to the available  alternatives and from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System."( Cost-utility analysis of venetoclax in combination with obinutuzumab as first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in Spain.
De la Serna-Torroba, J; Escudero-Vilaplana, V; Hernández-Rivas, JÁ; Moreno-Martínez, E; Sánchez-Cuervo, M; Sánchez-Hernández, R, 2022
)
0.72
" CY/BEN treated mice when combined with cyclosporine A (CSA) (10mg/kg daily from days +5 to +18 and thrice weekly thereafter), had improved outcomes over CY/CY +CSA treated mice."( Partially replacing cyclophosphamide with bendamustine in combination with cyclosporine A improves survival and reduces xenogeneic graft-versus-host-disease.
Cracchiolo, MJ; Davini, DW; Gilman, KE; Katsanis, E; Matiatos, AP; Simpson, RJ, 2022
)
0.72
"Together, we illustrate that the use of CY/BEN is safe and shows similar control of xGvHD to CY/CY, but when combined with CSA, survival with CY/BEN is significantly prolonged compared to CY/CY."( Partially replacing cyclophosphamide with bendamustine in combination with cyclosporine A improves survival and reduces xenogeneic graft-versus-host-disease.
Cracchiolo, MJ; Davini, DW; Gilman, KE; Katsanis, E; Matiatos, AP; Simpson, RJ, 2022
)
0.72

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" administration of 1, the bioavailability of the drug was found to be increased in the leukemia-bearing animals."( Influence of leukemia P388 on plasma concentration-time profiles of bendamustine in B6D2F1 mice.
Amlacher, R; Hoffmann, H; Preiss, R; Weber, H, 1992
)
0.28
" The absorption of the drug from the gastrointestinal tract is incomplete resulting in an absolute bioavailability of about 40%."( [Pharmacokinetics of bendamustin (Cytostasan) in B6D2F1-mice].
Amlacher, R; Hoffmann, H; Preiss, R; Weber, H, 1991
)
0.28
" It has good oral bioavailability but has been studied almost exclusively in the intravenous formulation."( Bendamustine for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and rituximab-refractory, indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Dennie, TW; Kolesar, JM, 2009
)
0.35

Dosage Studied

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Although bendamustine has been used for more than 30 years in the treatment of lymphoma, little is known about the optimal dosing schedule in relapsed or refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)."( Efficacy of bendamustine in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of a phase I/II study of the German CLL Study Group.
Bergmann, MA; Boening, L; Emmerich, B; Goebeler, ME; Hallek, MJ; Herold, M; Ruelfs, C; Wilhelm, M, 2005
)
0.33
" Optimal bendamustine dosing for CLL patients had not been finally established and a phase I/II study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of bendamustine."( Phase-I/II study to evaluate dose limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, and tolerability of bendamustine HCl in pre-treated patients with B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (Binet stages B and C) requiring therapy.
Arnaudov, G; Lissitchkov, T; Merkle, Kh; Peytchev, D, 2006
)
0.33
" dosing of 3 mg/kg."( Metabolic profile of [(14)C]bendamustine in rat urine and bile: preliminary structural identification of metabolites.
Chovan, JP; Li, F; Ring, SC; Yu, E, 2007
)
0.34
"The BSA-based dosing regimen for bendamustine achieved the targeted exposure and was associated with a high incidence of therapeutic response."( Bendamustine pharmacokinetic profile and exposure-response relationships in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
D'Andrea, D; Darwish, M; Kahl, B; Melhem, M; Owen, JS; Passarell, JA, 2010
)
0.36
" Bendamustine dosage was 80-150 mg on day 1+2 of a monthly cycle."( Bendamustine in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Bölke, E; Bruns, I; Czibere, A; Fenk, R; Haas, R; Kobbe, G; Michael, M; Neumann, F; Safaian, NN; Zohren, F, 2010
)
0.36
"The pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and dosage and administration of bendamustine and its use in indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are reviewed."( Bendamustine for the treatment of indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Czuczman, MS; Elefante, A, 2010
)
0.36
" The dosage and administration differ for the treatment of NHL and CLL."( Bendamustine for the treatment of indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Czuczman, MS; Elefante, A, 2010
)
0.36
" Additionally, phase I and pharmacokinetic studies are limited, although increased understanding of the clinical pharmacology of bendamustine led to development of dosing recommendations by international experts based on the available data."( Bendamustine: rescue of an effective antineoplastic agent from the mid-twentieth century.
Leoni, LM, 2011
)
0.37
" When dosed based upon BSA, it appeared that age, body weight, race, mild renal (n = 3) or hepatic (n = 2) dysfunction, cancer type, and cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitors (n = 17) or inducers (n = 3) did not affect systemic exposure, which was comparable between pediatric and adult patients."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of bendamustine in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory acute leukemia.
Bond, M; Darwish, M; Grasela, T; Hellriegel, E; Megason, G; Phillips, L; Robertson, P, 2014
)
0.4
"Altogether, the findings support dosing based on body surface area for most patient populations."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of bendamustine and its metabolites.
Bond, M; Chovan, JP; Darwish, M; Hellriegel, E; Robertson, P, 2015
)
0.42
" Thus, the strategy of host-guest inclusion was very effective and could be successfully used in the development of suitable pharmaceutical dosage form with enhanced therapeutic activity."( Inclusion complexes of bendamustine with β-CD, HP-β-CD and Epi-β-CD: in-vitro and in-vivo evaluation.
Gidwani, B; Vyas, A, 2015
)
0.42
" Dosage varied from 60 to 300 mg/m(2) (median 120 mg/m(2)) and was administered intravenously on day 1 and 2 of a 28-day cycle."( Bendamustine in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Hänel, M; Schmeel, FC; Schmeel, LC; Schmidt-Wolf, IG; Stöhr, E, 2015
)
0.42
" In 2014, this panel met again to update these recommendations since the clarification of issues including optimal dosing and management of bendamustine-related toxicities."( Optimal use of bendamustine in hematologic disorders: Treatment recommendations from an international consensus panel - an update.
Brugger, W; Cheson, BD; Damaj, G; Dreyling, M; Kahl, B; Kimby, E; Ogura, M; Weidmann, E; Wendtner, CM; Zinzani, PL, 2016
)
0.43
" Obinutuzumab plus bendamustine dosing was obinutuzumab 1000 mg (days 1, 8, and 15, cycle 1; day 1, cycles 2-6) plus bendamustine 90 mg/m(2) per day (days 1 and 2, cycles 1-6), and bendamustine monotherapy dosing was 120 mg/m(2) per day (days 1 and 2, all cycles)."( Obinutuzumab plus bendamustine versus bendamustine monotherapy in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (GADOLIN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.
Bouabdallah, K; Cheson, BD; Chua, N; Delwail, V; Dimier, N; Dueck, G; Fingerle-Rowson, G; Fowler, N; Gribben, J; Lennard, A; Lugtenburg, PJ; Mayer, J; Press, O; Salles, G; Sehn, LH; Trněný, M; Wassner-Fritsch, E, 2016
)
0.43
" Since bendamustine showed genotoxic effects in all tested concentrations, two of them corresponding to the peak plasma concentrations observed in cancer patients treated with bendamustine, data provided in the current research work may be useful to identify the most appropriate dosage regimen to achieve the efficacy and safety of this anticancer medication."( Assessment of bendamustine-induced genotoxicity in eukaryotic cells.
Castro-Prado, MAA; Franco, CCDS; Mathias, PCF; Morais, JF; Pereira, TS; Sant'anna, JR; Yajima, JPRS, 2019
)
0.51
" The selected obinutuzumab dosing regimen offers clinical benefit in a majority of rituximab-refractory FL patients treated with bendamustine, irrespective of variability in exposure, whilst minimising adverse events."( Pharmacokinetics, exposure, efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab in rituximab-refractory follicular lymphoma patients in the GADOLIN phase III study.
Brewster, M; Buchheit, V; Fingerle-Rowson, G; Frey, N; Gibiansky, E; Gibiansky, L; Jamois, C, 2019
)
0.51
" In summary, BR was well tolerated even in patients ≥80 years, with similar efficacy and safety as in less old patients, provided that carefully adapted dosing was applied."( Risk-adapted bendamustine + rituximab is a tolerable treatment alternative for elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a regional real-world report on 141 consecutive Swedish patients.
Asklid, A; Hansson, L; Johansson, H; Lundin, J; Mansouri, L; Mattsson, A; Österborg, A; Rosenquist, R; Sylvan, SE; Wiggh, J; Winqvist, M, 2020
)
0.56
"Same-day G-CSF compared with next-day G-CSF was the most common G-CSF dosing method utilized in primary and secondary prophylaxis (94% and 100%), respectively."( Outcomes of primary and secondary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced and febrile neutropenia in bendamustine plus rituximab regimens in patients with lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia: real-world, single-center experience.
Abraham, I; Bartels, T; Kumar, A; McBride, A; Moore, L; Persky, DO, 2021
)
0.62
" One strategy to reduce relapse rates being explored by others is a dosage reduction of PT-CY."( Feasibility and Efficacy of Partially Replacing Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide with Bendamustine in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients Undergoing Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation.
Husnain, M; Katsanis, E; Khurana, S; Kovacs, K; Roe, DJ; Simpson, RJ; Stea, B; Truscott, L, 2022
)
0.72
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Protein Targets (1)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
estrogen-related nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency33.49150.001530.607315,848.9004AID1224819; AID1224820
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Bioassays (8)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1347410qHTS for inhibitors of adenylyl cyclases using a fission yeast platform: a pilot screen against the NCATS LOPAC library2019Cellular signalling, 08, Volume: 60A fission yeast platform for heterologous expression of mammalian adenylyl cyclases and high throughput screening.
AID1347405qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS LOPAC collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347057CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - LANCE assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347151Optimization of GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347059CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - Alpha assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347058CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - HTRF assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1794808Fluorescence-based screening to identify small molecule inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase (Pf-apPOL).2014Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 19, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Assay to Identify Inhibitors of the Apicoplast DNA Polymerase from Plasmodium falciparum.
AID1794808Fluorescence-based screening to identify small molecule inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase (Pf-apPOL).
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (1,041)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-199012 (1.15)18.7374
1990's11 (1.06)18.2507
2000's118 (11.34)29.6817
2010's608 (58.41)24.3611
2020's292 (28.05)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 42.68

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index42.68 (24.57)
Research Supply Index7.18 (2.92)
Research Growth Index5.79 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index65.85 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (42.68)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials246 (23.10%)5.53%
Reviews151 (14.18%)6.00%
Case Studies173 (16.24%)4.05%
Observational18 (1.69%)0.25%
Other477 (44.79%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (340)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase I Study of FT576 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Daratumumab in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT05182073]Phase 1168 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-24Recruiting
Study of Bendamustine Hydrochloride Injection in Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients [NCT01109264]Phase 2147 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Isatuximab and Bendamustine in Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis [NCT04943302]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to PI left institution. Study not moving forward in her absence.)
A Phase III, Open-Label, Multicenter Randomized Study Evaluating Glofitamab as a Single Agent Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT06084936]Phase 3182 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-22Recruiting
A Randomized Phase III Study of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab Versus Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab Versus Ibrutinib Alone in Untreated Older Patients (>/= 65 Years of Age) With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) [NCT01886872]Phase 3547 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-09Active, not recruiting
The Efficacy of Bendamustine, Gemcytabine, Dexamethasone (BGD) Salvage Chemotherapy With Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) Consolidation in Advanced Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Not Responding to ABVD Therapy- Multicentre Phase II Clinica [NCT03615664]Phase 2115 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-06Active, not recruiting
Phase 1b Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Autologous CD30.CAR-T in Combination With PD-1 Checkpoint Inhibitor (Nivolumab) in Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients After Failure of Frontline Therapy (ACTION) [NCT05352828]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-07-25Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1b, Dose Escalation Study to Determine the Recommended Phase 2 Dose of TAK-659 in Combination With Bendamustine (±Rituximab), Gemcitabine, Lenalidomide, or Ibrutinib for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma After At Least 1 [NCT02954406]Phase 143 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-05Terminated(stopped due to Business decision, insufficient enrollment, no safety or efficacy concerns.)
Bendamustine + Obinutuzumab Induction Chemoimmunotherapy With Risk-adapted Obinutuzumab Maintenance Therapy in Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT03311126]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-19Active, not recruiting
Study Phase II Non-randomized Prospective Open to Assess the Combination of Rituximab, Bendamustine (RB) for Patients With Follicular Lymphoma Refractory or Relapsed After Treatment With R-chemotherapy in First Line. [NCT01127841]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-07-31Active, not recruiting
PHASE 1B/PHASE 3 MULTICENTER STUDY OF AVELUMAB (MSB0010718C) IN COMBINATION REGIMENS THAT INCLUDE AN IMMUNE AGONIST, EPIGENETIC MODULATOR, CD20 ANTAGONIST AND/OR CONVENTIONAL CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHO [NCT02951156]Phase 329 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-16Terminated(stopped due to Study was terminated due to closure of study arms following futility analysis and difficulty in enrolling participants due to evolving treatment landscape)
A Randomised, Open Label, Multi-centre, Phase III Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Bendamustine Compared to Treatment of Physician's Choice in the Treatment of Subjects With Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) Refractory to Rituximab [NCT01289223]Phase 388 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Ongoing challenges to successfully recruit the required number of subjects)
A Phase III, Randomised, Open-label,, Multi-Center Clinical Study Comparing JS004 Plus Toripalimab With Investigator-Selected Chemotherapy in Patients With PD-(L)1 Monoclonal Antibody Refractory Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) [NCT06170489]Phase 3185 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-22Not yet recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Nemtabrutinib Versus Chemoimmunotherapy for Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma Without TP53 Aberrations [NCT05624554]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-16Recruiting
A Phase I/II b (Randomized Controlled) Study of Atezolizumab Combined to BEGEV Regimen as First Salvage Treatment in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma Candidate to Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation [NCT05300282]Phase 1/Phase 2140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-03Recruiting
Lenalidomide, Bendamustine and Rituximab as First-line Therapy for Patients Over 65 Years With Mantle Cell Lymphoma - a Nordic Lymphoma Group Trial [NCT00963534]Phase 1/Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) Versus Investigator's Choice of Either Idelalisib Plus Rituximab or Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Subjects With R/R Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT02970318]Phase 3310 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-02Active, not recruiting
Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of CPI-613, in Combination With Bendamustine, in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory T-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma or Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT02168140]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
An Open-label Phase I/II Trial of Venetoclax-Dexamethasone in Relapsed and/or Refractory t(11;14) Systemic Light-Chain Amyloidosis [NCT05451771]Phase 1/Phase 253 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-26Recruiting
A Single Center Phase Ib Study of Carfilzomib, Bendamustine, and Dexamethasone in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02095834]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-24Completed
Phase 1 Study of the Administration of T Lymphocytes Expressing the Kappa Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) and CD28 Endodomain for Relapsed/Refractory Kappa+ Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma. [NCT04223765]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-12Recruiting
Phase II Study of Simvastatin, Zoledronic Acid, Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Methylprednisolone for Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma [NCT01332617]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Investigators no longer interested in activating study)
Observational Program for Evaluation of Ribomustin Use in the First Line Therapy of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT02110394]190 participants (Actual)Observational2012-06-30Completed
[NCT01376401]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
A Multi-Center, Open-Label, Single-Arm Phase II Trial of Bendamustine, Rituximab and the Second Generation BTK Inhibitor Acalabrutinib in Previously Untreated Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia [NCT04624906]Phase 259 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-02Recruiting
Clinical Research of Gene Therapy for Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Autologous T Cells Expressing a Chimeric Antigen Receptor Specific to the CD19 Antigen [NCT02134262]Phase 1/Phase 218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-05-31Recruiting
[NCT02162888]Phase 181 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
Bendamustine Plus Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone in the Treatment of Stage II/III Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01168804]Phase 279 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Phase I/II Study With Bendamustine and Temsirolimus in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Non-hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) Not Eligible for High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous/Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT01170052]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to insufficient enrollment)
Bendamustine, Cytarabine, Etoposide and Melphalan as Conditioning for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With Aggressive Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma. [NCT01296256]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
A Phase I/II Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Feasibility and Efficacy of the Addition of Temsirolimus to a Regimen of Bendamustine and Rituximab for the Treatment of Patients With Follicular Lymphoma or Mantle Cell Lymphoma in First to Third Relapse [NCT01078142]Phase 1/Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-02Completed
Efficacy of Polatuzumab, Bendamustine and Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed/ Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma - a Single Center Phase II Trial [NCT05868395]Phase 216 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-24Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1b, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of FT596 in Combination With R-CHOP in Subjects With B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT05934097]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to This study was withdrawn (Sponsor decision).)
Phase II Trial of Venetoclax and Rituximab as Initial Therapy in Older Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT05025423]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-21Recruiting
A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Prospective, Open-label Trial of Standard Chemoimmunotherapy (FCR/BR) Versus Rituximab Plus Venetoclax (RVe) Versus Obinutuzumab (GA101) Plus Venetoclax (GVe) Versus Obinutuzumab Plus Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax (GIVe) in [NCT02950051]Phase 3926 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-13Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab and Bendamustine Combination (NB) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT03343652]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-27Completed
Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of CPI-613, in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab, in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT02168907]Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow Accruals)
Ofatumumab With or Without Bendamustine for Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Ineligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant [NCT01437709]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A Phase I Safety and Feasibility Study of Cellular Immunotherapy for Extensive Stage Small Cell Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer Using Autologous T Cells Lentivirally Transduced to Express L1CAM-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor [NCT06094842]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-03-01Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter, Phase 1/2 Study of Selinexor in Combination With Backbone Treatments or Novel Therapies in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory (RR) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) [NCT04607772]Phase 1/Phase 2350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-18Suspended(stopped due to Sponsor decision)
A Study of Thalidomide, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone (BTD) Versus Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone (BBD) in Patients With Renal Failure Defined as a GFR Below 30 Mls/Min [NCT02424851]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Phase I Study of Escalating-Doses of Bendamustine for Patients With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma [NCT02315157]Phase 10 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to Withdrawn by PI)
A Prospective, Multicenter, Phase-II Trial Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine + GA101 (BG) in Patients With Relapsed CLL Followed by Maintenance Therapy With GA101 for Responding Patients [NCT02320383]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Active, not recruiting
Fase II Study With Bortezomib, Rituximab and Bendamustin-BRB- for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoplasmocytic Lymphoma/Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia's Patients at First Relapse [NCT02371148]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Bendamustine, Prednisone and Velcade® for First-line Treatment of Patients With Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma Not Eligible for High-dose Chemotherapy Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (BPV). [NCT02237261]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
A Multicenter, Open-label, Phase I Study of SyB C-0501(Oral Bendamustine) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: [NCT03604679]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-24Completed
A Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter Phase-II Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Sequential Regimen of Bendamustine Followed by GA101 and ABT-199 Followed by ABT-199 and GA101 Maintenance in CLL Patients [NCT02401503]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-06Active, not recruiting
A Multi-Center, Open Label Phase 1/2 Study of CYT-0851 in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Malignancies and Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT03997968]Phase 1/Phase 2170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-09Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/Ib Study of Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplant With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide and/or Bendamustine [NCT02996773]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Zanubrutinib Followed Zanubrutinib Plus FCR (Fludarabine Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab) / BR(Bendamustine and Rituximab) in Newly Diagnosed Symptomatic CLL/SLL (STOP Trial) [NCT05287984]Phase 263 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-22Not yet recruiting
A Phase 2 Open-label Study of Brentuximab Vedotin in Front-line Therapy of Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) an dCD30-expressing Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL) in Older Patients or Patients With Significant Comorbidities Ineligible for Standard Chemotherapy [NCT01716806]Phase 2131 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
Phase II Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab Induction Chemoimmunotherapy Followed by Maintenance Rituximab and Lenalidomide in Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL) [NCT01754857]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-12Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor, PCI-32765 (Ibrutinib), in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT01776840]Phase 3523 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-16Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Rituximab/Bendamustine Followed by Rituximab/Cytarabine for Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT01661881]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-16Active, not recruiting
A Study to Infuse ROR1-Specific Autologous T Cells for Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) / Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL) [NCT02194374]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study closed with no enrollment due to unavailability of reagent.)
An Open-Label, Dose-Finding, and Cohort-Expansion Phase 1 Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of INCB050465 in Combination With Bendamustine and Obinutuzumab in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (CITADEL-102) [NCT03039114]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-15Completed
Anti-CD22 Immunoconjugate Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (CMC-544) Added to Fludarabine, Bendamustine and Rituximab and Allogeneic Transplantation for CD22 Positive-Lymphoid Malignancies [NCT01664910]Phase 1/Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-29Completed
A Study of the Zanubrutinib Given in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab in (Elderly or TP53 Alterations or Chemotherapy Intolerance) Patients With Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT06136351]Phase 223 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-15Recruiting
Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma Randomised Trial Against Standard ChemoTherapy (REFRACT): A Randomised Phase II Trial of Investigator Choice Standard Therapy Versus Sequential Novel Therapy Experimental Arms [NCT05848765]Phase 2284 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-04Recruiting
Intergroup Randomized Phase 2 Four Arm Study In Patients ≥ 60 With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma Of Therapy With: Arm A = Rituximab+ Bendamustine Followed By Rituximab Consolidation (RB → R); Arm B = Rituximab + Bendamustine + Bortezomib Follo [NCT01415752]Phase 2373 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-09Active, not recruiting
Observational Program for Evaluation of Ribomustin and Rituximab Combined Therapy With Following Rituximab Maintenance of Relapsed or Refractory Indolent B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT02072967]97 participants (Actual)Observational2012-05-31Completed
Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab (KEytruda) in Combination With Bendamustine (TREanda) in Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT04510636]Phase 237 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-20Recruiting
A Phase I/II Trial of Rituximab, Bendamustine, and Obatoclax in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT01238146]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to No patients accrued.)
Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter Phase-II Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Sequential Regimen of Bendamustine Followed by GA101 (Obinutuzumab) and CAL-101 (Idelalisib) Followed by CAL-101 and GA101 Maintenance in CLL Patients [NCT02445131]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-28Completed
A Phase 1b/2, Open-Label Trial to Assess the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Epcoritamab (GEN3013; DuoBody®-CD3xCD20) in Combination With Other Agents in Subjects With B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL) [NCT04663347]Phase 1/Phase 2662 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-03Recruiting
PHASE II CLINICAL PROTOCOL FOR THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA WITH A COMBINATION OF BENDAMUSTINE AND OFATUMUMAB [NCT01125787]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Low enrollment)
Randomized Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and the Safety of Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) Compared to Investigator's Choice Therapy in Patient With Relapsed or Refractory Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma [NCT03593018]Phase 386 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-09Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Trial of Dexamethasone, Ofatumumab and Bendamustine [Treanda] (DOT) as First-line Treatment of Mantle-cell Lymphoma (MCL) in the Elderly [NCT01221103]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-04-30Recruiting
A Retrospective Multicenter Trial on Efficacy and Toxicity of Bendamustine Alone or Associated With Rituximab, as Salvage Therapy in Patients With Chronic Lymphoproliferative Disorders [NCT01224769]109 participants (Actual)Observational2005-09-30Completed
PHASE II CLINICAL PROTOCOL FOR THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA WITH A COMBINATION OF BENDAMUSTINE AND OFATUMUMAB [NCT01131247]Phase 237 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to PI left institution)
Phase I Trial With Cohort Expansion of Pentostatin, Bendamustine and Ofatumumab (PBO) for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT01352312]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-25Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient accrual over 12 mo period)
BRIEF: Bendamustine and Rituximab In Elderly Follicular: A Multicentric Phase II Study Evaluating the Benefit of a Short Induction Treatment by Bendamustine and Rituximab Followed by Maintenance Therapy With Rituximab In Elderly (≥ 60 Years Old) Patients [NCT01313611]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Treament with rituximab during maintenance phase was stoped, according to DSMC recommendations, since 3 cases of deaths occured.)
A Phase I Study of Bendamustine and Bevacizumab for Patients With Advanced Cancers [NCT01152203]Phase 159 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Phase 1/2 Study of Lenalidomide in Combination With Bendamustine (LEBEN) in Relapsed and Primary Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT01412307]Phase 1/Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II, Multicenter, Prospective, Non-randomised, Open-label, Clinical Trial to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of BeEAC Conditioning Regimen in Malignant Lymphoma Subjects With Indications to Autologous Hematopoietic Stem-cell Transplantation [NCT03315520]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-22Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Bendamustine HCL in Relapsed and Primary Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma. [NCT00705250]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter Phase-II Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Sequential Regimen of Bendamustine Followed by Obinutuzumab (GA101), Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) and Venetoclax (ABT-199) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory CLL ( [NCT04515238]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-01Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label, Multi-Centre, Randomised, Phase Ib Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of RO5072759 Given in Combination With CHOP, FC or Bendamustine Chemotherapy in Patients With CD20+ B-Cell Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00825149]Phase 1137 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
"A PHASE 3 OPEN-LABEL RANDOMIZED STUDY TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RITUXIMAB PLUS LENALIDOMIDE (CC-5013) VERSUS RITUXIMAB PLUS CHEMOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY RITUXIMAB IN SUBJECTS WITH PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA The RELEVANCE Trial (Ritu [NCT01650701]Phase 31,030 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Bendamustine in Combination With Rituximab in Older Patients With Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma [NCT01234467]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Phase II Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab Induction Chemoimmunotherapy With Maintenance Lenalidomide and Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL [NCT00974233]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Duvelisib Administered in Combination With Rituximab and Bendamustine vs Placebo Administered in Combination With Rituximab and Bendamustine in Subjects With Previously-Treated Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT02576275]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to The scope of the program has been reduced to focus resources on studies which can potentially enable the registration of duvelisib.)
Phase II Clinical Study on SyB L-0501 in Patients With Indolent B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma or Mantle Cell Lymphoma (Multicenter, Open-label Study) [NCT00612183]Phase 256 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
A Phase 3b Study in Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Subjects, Excluding Those With the 17p Deletion, to Evaluate Debulking Regimens Prior to Initiating Venetoclax Combination Therapy [NCT03406156]Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-10Completed
A Phase 1-2 Study of a Novel Conditioning Regimen of Bendamustine and Melphalan Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00916058]Phase 1/Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-23Completed
An Open-Label Study to Evaluate Bendamustine Hydrochloride in the Treatment of Chinese Patients With Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) Refractory to Rituximab Treatment [NCT01596621]Phase 3102 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-06Completed
The CAD5 Study::Therapy for Chronic Cold Agglutinin Disease: A Prospective, Non-randomized International Multicenter Trial on the Safety and Efficacy of Bendamustine and Rituximab Combination Therapy [NCT02689986]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Shortened vs Standard Chemotherapy Combined With Immunotherapy for the Initial Treatment of Patients With High Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma. A Randomized, Open Label, Phase III Study by Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. [NCT05058404]Phase 3602 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-01Recruiting
Post-Transplant Bendamustine (PT-BEN) for GVHD Prophylaxis [NCT04022239]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-13Recruiting
Phase I Study of Bendamustine With Concurrent Whole Brain Radiation Therapy in Patients With Brain Metastases From Solid Tumors [NCT00879073]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Principal Investigator is leaving Moffitt)
Phase I Study to Evaluate Cellular Immunotherapy Using Memory-Enriched T Cells Lentivirally Transduced to Express a CD19-Specific, Hinge-Optimized, CD28-Costimulatory Chimeric Receptor and a Truncated EGFR Following Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy in Adult P [NCT02153580]Phase 137 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-24Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Evaluation of Bendamustine, Obinutuzumab and Venetoclax in Patients With Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT03872180]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-11Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Gemcitabine, Bendamustine, and Nivolumab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT03739619]Phase 1/Phase 254 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-26Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study With Bendamustine Plus Brentuximab Vedotin in Hodgkin's Lymphoma and CD30+ Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma in First Salvage Setting: the BBV Regimen. [NCT02499627]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-23Terminated(stopped due to expected accrual not reached)
A Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial to Assess Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment for Hodgkin Lymphoma's Disease Combining Adcetris® and Levact® in Old Patients [NCT02467946]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-14Completed
Phase I/II Study of the Combination of Bendamustine, Rituximab and MK-2206 in the Treatment of Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma [NCT01369849]Phase 1/Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Adjustment of Chemotherapy Duration in Follicular Lymphoma Patients According to Peripheral Blood or Bone Marrow Minimal Residual Disease Status [NCT04934930]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-29Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Melphalan, Bendamustine, and Carfilzomib for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT02148913]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab (BR) in Patients With Relapsed or Progressive Marginal Zone B-cell Lymphoma (MZBCL) [NCT02433795]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Bendamustine, Carboplatin and Dexamethasone (BCD) for Refractory or Relapsed Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma: BENCART Trial [NCT02424045]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Odronextamab (REGN1979), an Anti-CD20 X Anti-CD3 Bispecific Antibody Versus Investigator's Choice in Previously Untreated Participants With Follicular Lymphoma (OLYMPIA-1) [NCT06091254]Phase 3478 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-12Recruiting
A Pilot Study of Immunotherapy Including Haploidentical NK Cell Infusion Following CD133+ Positively-Selected Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Children With High Risk Solid Tumors or Lymphomas [NCT02130869]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-10Completed
A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study Comparing Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) Plus Rituximab Versus Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Patients With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Are Ineligible for Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT04002297]Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-21Recruiting
A Phase Ib Dose Escalation Trial of Carfilzomib in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab In Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT02187133]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-05Completed
A Phase I Trial of Bendamustine Plus Alemtuzumab for the Treatment of Fludarabine Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT00947388]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Terminated(stopped due to No more eligible patients)
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Single Center Study of KYV-101, an Autologous Fully-Human Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CD19 CAR T) Therapy, in Subjects With Non-relapsing and Progressive Forms of Multiple Sclerosis [NCT06138132]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
Phase II Study of the Administration of T Lymphocytes Expressing the CD30 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) for Relapsed/Refractory CD30+ Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma [NCT04083495]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-17Recruiting
A Phase 1/2, Open-label, Multi-center Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Durvalumab (Anti-PDL1 Antibody) as Monotherapy and in Combination Therapy in Subjects With Lymphoma or Chronic Lymphocitic Leukemia [NCT02733042]Phase 1/Phase 2106 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-11Completed
A Multicentric, Open-Label, Single Arm Study of Obinutuzumab Short Duration Infusion (SDI) in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Follicular Lymphoma [NCT03817853]Phase 4114 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-26Completed
Frontline Treatment With Bendamustine in Combination With Rituximab in Adults Age 65 or Older With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Phase II Study [NCT00758693]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding was withdrawn due to insufficient accrual)
An Open-Label Study of Bendamustine Combined With Bortezomib for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00920855]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
A Phase II Study of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, PCI-32765 (Ibrutinib), in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B Cell Lymphomas [NCT02747732]Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-31Recruiting
An Open-Label Study of Bendamustine Hydrochloride in Combination With Rituximab in the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00891839]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Rituximab, Bendamustine and Lenalidomide in Patients With Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma Not Eligible for High Dose Chemotherapy or Anthracycline-Based Therapy. A Phase I/II Trial. [NCT00987493]Phase 1/Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Phase 2 Study of Cytarabine in Association With Bendamustine and Rituximab in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma [NCT02758925]Phase 278 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-06-30Not yet recruiting
A Phase 2/3 Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Active-Control Study of Zilovertamab Vedotin (MK-2140) in Combination With Standard of Care in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (waveLINE-003) [NCT05139017]Phase 2/Phase 3420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-14Recruiting
Multicentric, Non-Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Bendamustine And Rituximab for Patients With Previously Untreated Extranodal Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue (MALT) Lymphoma [NCT01015248]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Prospective Randomised Multicenter Study for Therapy Optimization (First Line) of Advanced Progredient, Low Malignant Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas and Mantle Cell Lymphomas [NCT00991211]Phase 3549 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
IIT2017-03-Merin-HaploBFR: Bendamustine, Fludarabine, And Rituximab Conditioning For Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation With CD56-Enriched Donor Cell Infusion For Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, and CLL [NCT03524235]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-18Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of Bendamustine and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Patients With 1- 4 Brain Metastases From Solid Malignancies [NCT00837928]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-19Completed
A Multicentre Phase I-II Study to Investigate the Combination of Bendamustine With Weekly Paclitaxel as First or Second Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00661739]Phase 138 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Phase III Trial of Combined Immunochemotherapy With Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab (FCR) Versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia [NCT00769522]Phase 3564 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-02Completed
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Polatuzumab Vedotin in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab Compared With Bendamustine and Rituximab Alone in Chinese Patients With [NCT04236141]Phase 342 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-10Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor's decision, no safety concerns)
Open Label Phase II Trial of Bendamustine Hydrochloride (HCL) in Women With Advanced Ovarian Cancer [NCT00867503]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Multicenter Phase I Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety of Two Consecutive Days of SyB L-0501 in Combination With Rituximab to Patients With Aggressive B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00794638]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
First-line Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma of Old Patients . Evaluate the Efficacy, Toxicity, and Molecular Prognostic Factors of Velcade®) in Association With Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy With Rituximab [NCT00740415]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Prospective, Open-label, Multicentre Phase-II Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Sequential Regimen of Bendamustine Followed by Ofatumumab and Ibrutinib Followed by Ibrutinib and Ofatumumab Maintenance in CLL Patients [NCT02689141]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-04Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Ofatumumab and Bendamustine vs. Ofatumumab, Bortezomib (NSC # 681239) and Bendamustine in Patients With Untreated Follicular Lymphoma [NCT01286272]Phase 2135 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-08Active, not recruiting
Multicenter Phase II Study of Bendamustine Plus Subcutaneous Rituximab in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Type Monomorphic Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder [NCT02753062]Phase 222 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-08-31Recruiting
Bendamustine Combined With Rituximab for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT00831597]Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
S0902, Phase II Study of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab for the Treatment of Refractory B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT00939328]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to question was no longer committee priority)
A Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Safety of ABT-263 in Combination With Either Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab (FCR) or Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR) in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT00868413]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Pilot Study of Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Rituximab for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory, Indolent or Mantle Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00547534]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Fludarabine, Bendamustine, and Rituximab (FBR) Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Conditioning for Patients With Lymphoid Malignancies [NCT00880815]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-17Completed
Addition of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Pre- and Post-Allogeneic Transplantation [NCT03856216]Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-28Recruiting
"Bendamustine in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed T-cell Lymphoma. A Phase II Multicenter Study BENTLY" [NCT00959686]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Bendamustine Versus Fludarabine as 2nd-line Treatment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Stage BINET B+C / RAI II-IV [NCT01423032]Phase 2/Phase 396 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Bendamustine, Velcade and Dexamethasone (BVD) in the Treatment of Elderly Patients (>= 65 Years) With Multiple Myeloma in 1st Relapse or Refractory to 1st Line Therapy [NCT01045681]Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-03Completed
A Phase II Multicenter Open Label Risk Stratified Sequential Treatment With Rituximab, Brentuximab Vedotin and Bendamustine (RBvB) in Patients Newly Diagnosed. [NCT04138875]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of funding)
Immunochemotherapy With Rituximab-Bendamustine-Cytarabine for Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Not Eligible for Intensive Regimens or Autologous Transplantation. [NCT00992134]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Open-Label Study to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics of Bendamustine Hydrochloride Following Intravenous Infusion of [14C] Bendamustine Hydrochloride in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Malignancy [NCT00863850]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Phase I Clinical Trial of Bendamustine, Lenalidomide and Rituximab in B-Cell Lymphoid Malignancies [NCT00864942]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Phase I Study of Bendamustine in Combination With Lenalidomide (CC-5013) and Dexamethasone in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01042704]Phase 129 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled, Multicenter Study of Zandelisib (ME- 401) in Combination With Rituximab Versus Standard Immunochemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed Indolent Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma (iNHL) - The COASTAL Study [NCT04745832]Phase 382 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-13Terminated(stopped due to Discontinuation of zandelisib program)
Pilot Study of CPI-613, in Combination With Bendamustine, in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory T-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT04217317]Phase 212 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-16Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Alone Versus in Combination With Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) in Subjects With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT02972840]Phase 3635 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-05Active, not recruiting
Adequacy of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients With Relapsed Lymphoma Treated With Bendamustine: A Pilot Project and a Proof of Concept Study [NCT01022021]Early Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Phase II Study With Bendamustine, Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine (BeGEV) as Induction Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients Before High Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transplant [NCT01884441]Phase 259 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-07-31Recruiting
A Phase I Trial of Bendamustine in Combination With Clofarabine and Etoposide in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic Malignancies [NCT01900509]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A Phase I/II Trial of Bendamustine in Combination With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Hoosier Cancer Research Network MM08-141 [NCT01177683]Phase 1/Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of accrual)
A Multicenter, Single-arm Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine Hydrochloride Injection in Subjects With Rituximab-resistant Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas [NCT04569838]Phase 291 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Rituximab Plus Bendamustine as Front Line Treatment in Frail Elderly (>70 Years) Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: a Phase II Multicenter Study of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) [NCT01990144]Phase 249 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-11-30Recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Carfilzomib in Combination With Bendamustine and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT02002598]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
A Phase I/Ib Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ublituximab, a Third-Generation Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody, in Combination With TGR-1202, a Novel PI3k Delta Inhibitor; and Ibrutinib or Bendamustine, in Patients With B-cell Malignancies. [NCT02006485]Phase 1160 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-13Completed
A Phase 1b/2 Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of TRU-016 in Combination With Bendamustine vs. Bendamustine Alone in Patients With Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT01188681]Phase 1/Phase 279 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Phase I Study of Bendamustine, Rituximab, Ibrutinib, and Venetoclax in Relapsed, Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT03295240]Early Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-20Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter Phase II Study Evaluating BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) Prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for First and Second Chemosensitive Relapses in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma [NCT02008006]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-09Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient recruitment and unavailability of the treatment)
AN OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED, PHASE 3 STUDY OF INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN ADMINISTERED IN COMBINATION WITH RITUXIMAB COMPARED TO DEFINED INVESTIGATOR'S CHOICE THERAPY IN SUBJECTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY CD22-POSITIVE AGGRESSIVE NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA WHO ARE NO [NCT01232556]Phase 3338 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-04Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated prematurely on May 16, 2013, for futility. No new or unexpected safety issues were identified.)
A Phase 3 Open-Label, Randomized Study of Pirtobrutinib (LOXO-305) Versus Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Untreated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma [NCT05023980]Phase 3250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-23Recruiting
A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Study of MK-4280A (Coformulated Favezelimab [MK-4280] Plus Pembrolizumab [MK-3475]) Versus Physician's Choice Chemotherapy in PD-(L)1-refractory, Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (KEYFORM-008) [NCT05508867]Phase 3360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-18Recruiting
Randomized Phase II Trial in Early Relapsing or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma [NCT03269669]Phase 295 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-23Recruiting
An Open-Label Study of Bendamustine Hydrochloride for the Treatment of Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Leukemia [NCT01088984]Phase 1/Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
A Phase I Study to Investigate the Safety and Clinical Activity of Idelalisib in Combination With Chemotherapeutic Agents, Immunomodulatory Agents and Anti-CD20 mAb in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Indolent B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Mantle Cell [NCT01088048]Phase 1241 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-25Completed
Phase II Trial of Bendamustine in Adult Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma [NCT01649622]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Withdrawn
"Subcutaneous Rituximab and Intravenous Bendamustine in Very Elderly Patients or Elderly Medically Non Fit Patients (Slow Go) With Aggressive CD20-positive B-cell" [NCT01686321]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-04Completed
A Multicenter, Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study in Previously Untreated Patients With Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Evaluating the Benefit of GA101 (RO5072759) Plus Chemotherapy Compared With Rituximab Plus Chemotherapy Followed by GA101 [NCT01332968]Phase 31,401 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-06Completed
A Phase 1b/2a Study of ABT-888 in Combination With Bendamustine +/- Rituximab in Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma and Solid Tumors [NCT01326702]Phase 1/Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
Phase 1 Trial of Dasatinib and Bendamustine in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT00872976]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Business Objectives Changed)
Treatment With Lenalidomide, Bendamustine and Prednisone (RBP) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation or Conventional Chemotherapy OSHO #077 [NCT01002703]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-09-30Recruiting
Phase II Study of Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab, in Patients With CD30 Positive, Relapsed or Refractory B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) [NCT02623920]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-16Withdrawn(stopped due to Pharmaceutical company supplying the drug withdraw financial support. PI has decided to close study prior to enrollment of any patients.)
Phase I/IIa Study of the Novel Combination of Bendamustine With Irinotecan Followed by Etoposide/Carboplatin in Chemonaive Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00856830]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Bendamustine Combined With Alemtuzumab in Pretreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) - A Phase I/II Trial With Concomitant Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy [NCT00951457]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized, Phase III Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine Compared With Bendamustine+RO5072759 (GA101) in Patients With Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT01059630]Phase 3413 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With Bendamustine in Combination With Ofatumumab in Previously Untreated Patients With Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) [NCT01108341]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
A Study to Assess the Effect of Treatment With Bendamustine in Combination With Rituximab on QT Interval in Patients With Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) or Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) [NCT01073163]Phase 354 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Phase II Study of Bendamustine, Mitoxantrone, and Rituximab (BMR) for Patients With Untreated High Risk Follicular Lymphoma [NCT00901927]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Study was closed early due to toxicity)
Nonmyeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation With or Without Lenalidomide for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (RV-CLL-PI-0294) [NCT00899431]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-06Terminated(stopped due to Terminated per PI's request at the time of continuing review)
An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study of Bendamustine Hydrochloride and Rituximab (BR) Compared With Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CHO [NCT00877006]Phase 3447 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Phase II Study for Safety and Efficacy of BEB (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Busulfan) Conditioning Regimen for ASCT in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT02836639]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-02-29Recruiting
Bendamustine and Rituximab for the Treatment of Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma. The International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG) 36 Phase II Prospective Study [NCT02853370]Phase 278 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Lenalidomide in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab for Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma(CLL/SLL): a Phase I Study [NCT01400685]Phase 134 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Study of Bendamustine + Rituximab With or Without Navitoclax in Patients With Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT01423539]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to The NAVIGATE study has been terminated due to non-safety related reasons.)
A Pilot/Feasibility Phase I Study of Bendamustine, Rituximab and Lenalidomide in Patients With Refractory/Relapsed Indolent NHL [NCT01429025]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
A Phase 2b Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Ublituximab + Umbralisib With or Without Bendamustine and Umbralisib Alone in Patients With Previously Treated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT02793583]Phase 2/Phase 3710 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-25Terminated(stopped due to Strategic/Business Decision)
Randomized Open Label of Ofatumumab and Bendamustine Combination Compared With Bendamustine Monotherapy in Indolent B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Unresponsive to Rituximab or a Rituximab-Containing Regimen During or Within Six Months of Treatment [NCT01077518]Phase 3346 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-26Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated early as it did not meet the Primary efficacy objective after primary analysis.)
Dose-escalation Study of Graft-versus-host Disease Prophylaxis With High-dose Post-transplantation Bendamustine in Patients With Refractory Acute Leukemia [NCT02799147]Phase 1/Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Completed
A Phase I, Dose-escalation Trial of Rituxan and Bendamustine in Combination With Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, PCI-32765, in Patients With Relapsed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma, Mantle Cell Lymphoma, or Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT01479842]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-07Active, not recruiting
An Open-label, Phase Ib Study of IPI-145 in Combination With Rituximab or Bendamustine/Rituximab in Select Subjects With Lymphoma or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT01871675]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
A Phase II Open-Label Study of Ofatumumab and Bendamustine Followed by Maintenance Ofatumumab for Indolent B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (B-NHL) Which Has Relapsed After Rituximab or a Rituximab Containing Therapy [NCT01294579]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-17Completed
A Phase II Study of Bendamustine in the Treatment of Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas (Anaplastic Gliomas and Glioblastoma) [NCT00823797]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Department of Hematologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China [NCT04762745]Phase 1/Phase 256 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-28Not yet recruiting
A Single-arm, Multi-center Phase II Trial of Bendamustine/Rituximab Induction Followed by Venetoclax and Rituximab Consolidation for the Frontline Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) [NCT03609593]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-12Active, not recruiting
A Dose-Ranging Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Patients With Comorbidities and/or Renal Dysfunction [NCT01832922]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Phase I Study of the Administration of T Lymphocytes Co-Expressing the CD30 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) and CCR4 for Relapsed/Refractory CD30+ Hodgkin Lymphoma and Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma [NCT03602157]Phase 159 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-12Recruiting
Benadamustine, Fludarabine and Busulfan Conditioning in Recipients of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation (FluBuBe) [NCT04942730]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-21Recruiting
Graft-versus-host Disease Prophylaxis With Combination of Post-transplantation Benadamustine and Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Refractory Myeloid Malignancies (PTBCy) [NCT04943757]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-21Recruiting
A Multi-Center, Open-Label, Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Anti-Tumor Activity of AB-101 Monotherapy and AB-101 With Immunotherapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma of B-Cell Origin. [NCT04673617]Phase 1/Phase 2108 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-29Recruiting
A Multicenter, Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study in Relapsed/Refractory Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia to Evaluate the Benefit of Venetoclax (GDC-0199/ABT-199) Plus Rituximab Compared With Bendamustine Plus Rituximab [NCT02005471]Phase 3389 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-17Completed
A Multi-Center Phase III Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Treanda™ (Bendamustine HCl) in Patients With Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) Who Are Refractory to Rituximab [NCT00139841]Phase 3103 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
A Multicenter, Phase III, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Response-adapted Strategy to Define Maintenance After Standard Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients With Advanced-stage Follicular Lymphoma. [NCT02063685]Phase 3807 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Bendamustine in Combination With Rituximab as Initial Treatment for Patients With Indolent Non-follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT01929265]Phase 273 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
A Phase 1 Study of Cosibelimab (TG-1501) in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma [NCT03778073]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-17Terminated(stopped due to Strategic/Business Decision)
A Multi-Center Phase II Study to Investigate the Safety and Activity of SDX-105 (Bendamustine) in Combination With Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed Indolent or Mantle Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) [NCT00076349]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Treatment of Relapsed / Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) WITH Bendamustine / Mitoxantrone (BM) [NCT00274963]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
A Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter Randomized Phase III Study to Compare The Efficacy and Safety of A Combined Regimen of Venetoclax and Obinutuzumab Versus Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab (FCR)/Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in FIT Pati [NCT04285567]Phase 3166 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-28Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Versus Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma [NCT05371093]Phase 3230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-12Recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Bendamustine and Erlotinib for Metastatic or Locally Advanced Triple Negative Breast Cancer [NCT00834678]Phase 1/Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Ofatumumab and Bendamustine in Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/ Small Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT01010568]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Unable to accrue patients due to change in standard CLL therapy)
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Fludarabine, Bendamustine, and Rituximab (FBR) in Previously Treated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) [NCT01096992]Phase 1/Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-19Completed
Phase II Study of the Combination of Bendamustine and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed AL Amyloidosis [NCT01222260]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Phase I Study of FT819 in Subjects With B-cell Malignancies [NCT04629729]Phase 1396 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-26Recruiting
Multicenter Phase II Study With Bendamustin for Patients With Refractory Soft Tissue Sarcoma [NCT00204620]Phase 228 participants Interventional2002-03-31Completed
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase Ib Trial of GA101 (RO5072759) in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT01300247]Phase 141 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Bendamustine and Melphalan Conditioning and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Treatment of Multiple Myeloma and Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Lymphoma in Elderly Patients [NCT03352765]Phase 128 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-20Active, not recruiting
Brief Induction Chemoimmunotherapy With Rituximab + Bendamustine + Mitoxantrone Followed by Rituximab in Elderly Patients With Advanced Stage Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma [NCT01523860]Phase 276 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Phase II Multicenter Clinical Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine, Dexamethasone and Thalidomide in R/R MM Pts After Treatment With Lenalidomide and Bortezomib or Which Are Ineligible to One of These Drugs [NCT01526694]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
A Multicenter, Open Study to Assess the Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Antitumor Effect of Bendamustine Hydrochloride (SyB L-0501: 90 or 120 mg/m2/Day) Administered Intravenously for Two Days in Patients With Indolent Lymphoma [NCT00389051]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Multicentre Phase II Trial of Bendamustine in Combination With Rituximab for Patients With Previously Untreated or Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. CLL2M Protocol of the German CLL-Study Group (GCLLSG) [NCT00274989]Phase 2195 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Phase II Study to Determine the Efficacy of Bendamustin (Ribomustin) in Patients With Recurrent Small Cell Bronchial Carcinoma After Cytostatic Polychemotherapy [NCT00168922]Phase 250 participants Interventional2001-02-28Recruiting
A Randomised Investigation of Alternative Ofatumumab-containing Regimens in Less Fit Patients With CLL [NCT01678430]Phase 3670 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-12-31Recruiting
Phase I-II Study of Bendamustine in Patients With Acute Leukemia and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT00790855]Phase 1/Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Lack of Response)
Randomized Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy vs. Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy for Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT05711628]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-08-10Withdrawn(stopped due to Other - Protocol moved to Withdrawn)
BrUOG 326: A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection (Marqibo®) in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab (BRiM) in Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT02257242]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-10Completed
Phase 1b, Open Label Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of TRU-016 in Combination With Rituximab, Obinutuzumab, Rituximab and Idelalisib, or Ibrutinib in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and With Bendamustine in Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma [NCT01644253]Phase 187 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Business decision)
Phase II Trial of Bendamustine, Bortezomib, and Rituximab in Patients With Previously Untreated Low Grade Lymphoma [NCT01029730]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of the Combination of Brentuximab Vedotin and Bendamustine in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma or Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma [NCT01657331]Phase 1/Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Study of Bendamustine Hydrochloride Injection in Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients [NCT01657955]Phase 396 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-01-31Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Bendamustine, Lenalidomide and Low-dose Dexamethasone, (BdL) for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed Myeloma. [NCT01686386]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-02-28Recruiting
An Open-label Phase I Drug-drug Interaction Study of Ofatumumab With Bendamustine for the Treatment of Subjects With Indolent B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT01691807]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Dose-Finding Study of INCB050465 in Combination With Investigator Choice of Rituximab, Bendamustine and Rituximab, or Ibrutinib in Participants With Previously Treated B-Cell Lymphoma (CITADEL-112) [NCT03424122]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-02Completed
An Open, Multicentric Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine, Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) and Dexamethasone (BRd) as 2nd-line Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01701076]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Bendamustine, Lenalidomide and Rituximab (R2-B) Combination as a Second-Line Therapy for First Relapsed-Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphomas: A Phase II Study [NCT01737177]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety Study of Second-Line Prolgolimab Monotherapy or in Combination With Bendamustine for Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT05757466]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-19Recruiting
Consolidation With ADCT-402 (Loncastuximab Tesirine) After a Short Course of Immunochemotherapy: a Phase II Study in BTKi-treated (or BTKi Intolerant) Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) Patients [NCT05249959]Phase 256 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-21Recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Bendamustine in Combination With Ofatumumab, Carboplatin and Etoposide for Refractory or Relapsed Aggressive B-cell Lymphomas [NCT01458366]Phase 1/Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-09Completed
HO11415: Phase II Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab Induction Chemoimmunotherapy Followed by Maintenance Rituximab (Rituxan®) and Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) in Relapsed and Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL) [NCT01754870]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to slow accrual)
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase IIIb, International Study Evaluating the Safety of Obinutuzumab Alone or in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Previously Untreated or Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT01905943]Phase 3979 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-04Completed
A Phase I/II Trial of Bendamustine/Treanda®, Rituximab, Etoposide, and Carboplatin for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoid Malignancies and Select Untreated Lymphomas (TREC) [NCT01165112]Phase 1/Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Open Label, Phase II Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab Followed by 90-yttrium (Y) Ibritumomab Tiuxetan for Untreated Follicular Lymphoma (Fol-BRITe Study) [NCT01234766]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study Of Gemcitabine And Bendamustine In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT01535924]Phase 1/Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-09Completed
A Phase 3 Open-Label, Randomized Study of LOXO-305 Versus Investigator's Choice of Idelalisib Plus Rituximab or Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in BTK Inhibitor Pretreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (BRUIN CLL-321) [NCT04666038]Phase 3250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-09Recruiting
A Phase II, Multi-centre Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of Ofatumumab and Bendamustine Combination in Patients With Untreated or Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL) [NCT01520922]Phase 299 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Phase II Study of Bendamustine, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (BBD) for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT02224729]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-25Completed
A Phase II Study of Brentuximab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine for Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma [NCT04587687]Phase 223 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-04Recruiting
Phase I Study of Autologous Transgenic T-Cells Expressing High Affinity Mesothelin-Specific T-Cell Receptor (TCR) (FH-TCR Tᴍsʟɴ) in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma [NCT04809766]Phase 115 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-14Recruiting
A Pilot Study of Acalabrutinib With Bendamustine / Rituximab Followed by Cytarabine / Rituximab for Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT03623373]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-29Active, not recruiting
A Multinational, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase II Study of SyB L-0501 in Combination With Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT01118845]Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Phase II Study of Second-Line Bendamustine in Relapsed or Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC). [NCT00984542]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Prospective Clinical Study of Hanlikang and BTK Inhibitors in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT05506410]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2022-08-12Recruiting
A Phase I/II, Multicenter, Open-label, Dose-escalation Study of Bendamustine in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01049945]Phase 1/Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Phase II Study of Age-Adjusted R-BAC (Rituximab, Bendamustine, Cytarabine) as Induction Therapy in Older Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) [NCT01662050]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-20Completed
A Phase 1 Study of TRU-016 in Combination With Rituximab and Bendamustine in Subjects With Relapsed Indolent Lymphoma [NCT01317901]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Bendamustine (B), Etoposide (E), Dexamethasone (D), and GCSF for Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization (BED) [NCT01110135]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Safety and Clinical Activity of Treanda® (Bendamustine HCL) and Idarubicin in Combination Therapy for Patients Age >= 50 With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT01141725]Phase 1/Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
A Single-Arm Multi-Center Trial of Bendamustine Given With Ofatumumab (BendOfa) in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). EudraCT Number 2009-017663-42. GIMEMA CLL0809 Protocol [NCT01244451]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, PCI-32765 (Ibrutinib), in Combination With Either Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) or Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednis [NCT01974440]Phase 3405 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Single Agent GA101 Versus GA101 Plus Bendamustine Followed by GA101 [NCT03492775]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-12Completed
Prospective Randomised Multicenter Study for Therapy Optimization of Recurrent, Progressive Low Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas and Mantle Cell Lymphomas [NCT01456351]Phase 3230 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
A Phase 2/3, Randomised, Multicentre Study of Tafasitamab With Bendamustine Versus Rituximab With Bendamustine in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (R-R DLBCL) Who Are Not Eligible for High-Dose Chemotherapy (HDC) and Auto [NCT02763319]Phase 2/Phase 3450 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Parsaclisib, a PI3Kδ Inhibitor, in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR), With Placebo and BR for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT04849715]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-11Withdrawn(stopped due to business decision; no enrolled patients)
A Prospective Phase II Study of Bendamustine in Patients Aged Over 60 Years With Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated by Prednisone, Vinblastine and Doxorubicin [NCT02414568]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-17Completed
An Open Label, Single Arm, Phase I/II in the Combination of Azacytidine, Bendamustine and Piamprizumab in Refractory/Relapsed B-cell Non-Hodgkin's [NCT04897477]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-22Recruiting
Feasibility of Assessing Lymphoma Response to Precise Local Injection of Candidate Chemotherapy Agents Using the CIVO(tm) Microdosing System [NCT01831505]Phase 14 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Phase I Study of Everolimus + Bendamustine in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Hematological Malignancies [NCT02240719]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
A phaseI/II Safety and Efficacy Trial of a Combination of Bendamustine, Rituximab and Lenalidomide (BRL) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT01558167]Phase 1/Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
A Multicenter, Single Arm Clinical Trial in Patients With Rituximab Refractory B-cell Indolent Lymphoma [NCT01570049]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-04-30Recruiting
A Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of ABT-199 in Combination With Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR) in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT01594229]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-21Completed
A Phase II Study of VELCADE (Bortezomib) in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma [NCT00636792]Phase 273 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Bendamustine Plus Rituximab for Mantle Cell Lymphoma: a Multicenter Retrospective Analysis(BR-MCL) [NCT04127916]40 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2020-01-30Recruiting
Study Phase II Non-randomized Prospective Open to Assess the Combination of Rituximab, Bendamustine, Mitoxantrone, Dexamethasone (R-BMD) in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma Refractory or Relapsed [NCT01133158]Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
MRD-Guided Abbreviation of Bendamustine and Rituximab Chemotherapy in Combination With Copanlisib in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma [NCT04155840]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to low accrual)
A Randomized Study to Assess the Effect on Response Rate of MabThera (Rituximab) Added to a Standard Chemotherapy, Bendamustine or Chlorambucil, in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT01056510]Phase 4357 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Phase II Study for the Evaluation of Bendamustine, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (BBD) in the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Not Candidates for High Dose Chemotherapy [NCT01056276]Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Risk-based, Response-adapted, Phase II Open-label Trial of Nivolumab + Brentuximab Vedotin (N + Bv) for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) CD30 + Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) After Failure of First-line Therapy, Follo [NCT02927769]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-28Active, not recruiting
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Multicenter Study of Intravenous PI3K Inhibitor Copanlisib in Combination With Standard Immunochemotherapy Versus Standard Immunochemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (iNHL [NCT02626455]Phase 3547 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-06Terminated(stopped due to The study did not meet the primary endpoint. The addition of copanlisib to standard immunochemo therapy did not improve progression-free survival compared to the control arm. Base on the study results, company decided to terminate the study.)
An Open-Label Phase I/II Study of Bendamustine, Weekly Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01484626]Phase 1/Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-05Terminated(stopped due to Celgene would no longer supply lenalidomide for the study)
Phase II Trial of Bortezomib and Bendamustine in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma [NCT01315873]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Terminated(stopped due to PI left the institution before all data analysis was completed)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Idelalisib in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab for Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT01980888]Phase 3311 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-05Terminated
Phase I Study of Autologous CD8+ and CD4+ Transgenic T Cells Expressing High Affinity KRASG12V Mutation-Specific T Cell Receptors in Participants With Metastatic Pancreatic, Colorectal and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers With KRAS G12V Mutations [NCT06043713]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Recruiting
A Single Arm Phase I/II Study of Tazemetostat With Rituximab and Abbreviated Bendamustine in the Frontline Treatment of High Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-LYM20-463 [NCT05551936]Phase 1/Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-26Recruiting
A Phase 3 Open-Label Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Plus Lenalidomide (CC-5013) Versus Rituximab Plus Chemotherapy in Subjects With Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma [NCT01476787]Phase 3255 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-29Active, not recruiting
Randomized Phase II Trial of Rituximab With Either Pentostatin or Bendamustine for Multiply Relapsed or Refractory Hairy Cell Leukemia [NCT01059786]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-01Active, not recruiting
A 3-Arm Randomized Phase II Trial of Bendamustine-Rituximab (BR) Followed by Rituximab vs Bortezomib-BR (BVR) Followed by Rituximab vs BR Followed by Lenalidomide/Rituximab in High Risk Follicular Lymphoma [NCT01216683]Phase 2289 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-09Completed
Phase II Study for Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Primary Refractory Aggressive B- Cell NHL and Anthracycline Chemotherapy Pretreatment, Who Received or Did Not Qualify for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation. [NCT00385125]Phase 230 participants Interventional2004-08-31Recruiting
Multicenter Phase II Study of the Bendamustine, Obinutuzumab, and Dexamethasone (BOD) Regimen in Un-fit Elderly ≥ 70 Years of Age Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (DLBCL) Patients [NCT02420210]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Trials was stopped early due to lack of funding.)
An Open-Label Expanded Access Trial for Bendamustine HCl in Patients With Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma That Has Progressed During or Following Treatment With a Rituximab Regimen or Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT01500083]Phase 390 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
A Phase 2 Multi-Center Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of CD30-Directed Genetically Modified Autologous T Cells (CD30.CAR-T) in Adult and Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT04268706]Phase 297 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-01Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Idelalisib (GS-1101) in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab for Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT01569295]Phase 3416 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-15Completed
A Phase I, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of FT596 as a Monotherapy and in Combination With Rituximab or Obinutuzumab in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT04245722]Phase 198 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-19Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated by the Sponsor.)
A Phase I Study of FT516 as Monotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and in Combination With Monoclonal Antibodies in Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT04023071]Phase 172 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-04Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated by the Sponsor.)
Weekly Bendamustine and Bortezomib Combination Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma or B-CLL: A Single-Center Phase 2 Study [NCT00426855]Phase 1/Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
A Phase 2 Open-label Study of MEDI-551 and Bendamustine vs Rituximab and Bendamustine in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory CLL [NCT01466153]Phase 2183 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-07Completed
Observation of the Efficacy of BAd Regimen in the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT05006469]Phase 310 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-01Recruiting
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Bendamustine, Gemcitabine, Rituximab, Nivolumab Combination (BeGeRN) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma [NCT03259529]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-27Completed
A Phase II, Open-label Study of Polatuzumab-vedotin (PV) in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab for Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Who Relapse After Previous Therapy With Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor [NCT04913103]Phase 221 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Open Label, Phase 2 Study of Rituximab and Bendamustine With or Without Brentuximab Vedotin for Relapsed or Refractory CD30-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT02594163]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor decision based on portfolio prioritization)
A Phase IB/II Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Combination With Either Obinutuzumab Plus Bendamustine or Obinutuzumab Plus CHOP in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma or Rituximab Plus CHOP in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Ly [NCT02596971]Phase 1/Phase 291 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-22Completed
Phase II Study of Bendamustine and Ofatumumab in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Who Are Poor Candidates for R-CHOP Chemotherapy [NCT01626352]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Bendamustine and Melphalan With Melphalan Alone as Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in Myeloma Patients [NCT03187223]Phase 2121 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-20Completed
Prospective Multicenter Study: Bendamustine in Combination With Rituximab as a First-line Therapy Followed by Maintenance Therapy With Rituximab in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma [NCT02423837]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-12-31Recruiting
A Pivotal Phase II Randomised, Multi-centre, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MB-CART2019.1 Compared to SoC Therapy in Participants With r/r DLBCL, Who Are Not Eligible for HDC and ASCT [NCT04844866]Phase 2168 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-18Recruiting
A Real-world Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Obinutuzumab-based Therapy for Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma [NCT05899621]332 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-06-01Recruiting
Observational Study in Comorbid Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Receiving First-line Bendamustine With Rituximab [NCT02381899]83 participants (Actual)Observational2014-09-30Completed
Phase II Clinical Study of Zanubrutinib Combined With Bendamustine and Rituximab (ZBR) for Time-limited Treatment of Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia [NCT05914662]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-15Recruiting
A Randomized 3-Arm Phase II Study Comparing 1.) Bendamustine, Rituximab and High Dose Cytarabine (BR/CR) 2.) Bendamustine, Rituximab, High Dose Cytarabine and Acalabrutinib (BR/CR-A), and 3.) Bendamustine, Rituximab and Acalabrutinib (BR-A) in Patients &l [NCT04115631]Phase 2360 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-13Active, not recruiting
A Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter Phase-II Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Sequential Regimen of Bendamustine Followed by GA101 and Ibrutinib (BIG) Followed by GA101 and Ibrutinib Maintenance in CLL Patients (CLL2-BIG Protocol) [NCT02345863]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-16Completed
Phase I/II Study of the Combination of Bendamustine, Rituximab and Pixantrone in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT01491841]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-01Completed
A Phase II, Trial of Chloroquine in Combination With VELCADE and Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Myeloma [NCT01438177]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Terminated(stopped due to PI left institution.)
A Randomized Phase II Trial of R-HCVAD/MTX/ARA-C Induction Followed by Consolidation With an Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Vs. R-Bendamustine Induction Followed by Consolidation With an Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Patients ≤ 65 Years of Age With [NCT01412879]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
A Phase 1/2 Single-arm, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination With Bendamustine in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) [NCT01874054]Phase 1/Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
A Phase IB, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Venetoclax (GDC-0199, ABT-199) in Combination With Bendamustine+Rituximab (BR) or Bendamustine+Obinutuzumab (BG) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory or Previously Untreated Chroni [NCT01671904]Phase 184 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-13Completed
A Phase II, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of GDC-0199 (ABT-199) Plus Bendamustine Plus Rituximab (BR) in Comparison With BR Alone or GDC-0199 Plus Rituximab (R) in Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lympho [NCT02187861]Phase 2163 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-01Completed
A Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter Phase-II Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Sequential Regimen of Bendamustine Followed by GA101 (Obinutuzumab), Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) and ABT-199 (Venetoclax) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory CLL ( [NCT03787264]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-14Completed
A Phase I-II Study of the Combination of Bendamustine and Pomalidomide With Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01754402]Phase 1/Phase 256 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-07Active, not recruiting
Phase III, Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized, Controlled Study Investigating Mosunetuzumab-Lenalidomide Versus Investigator Choices in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Marginal Zone Lymphoma [NCT06006117]Phase 3260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-05Recruiting
BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) Versus CEM (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan) in Lymphoma Patients as a Conditioning Regimen Before Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT05813132]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-12-01Completed
Pediatric Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Consortium Study: cHOD17 [NCT03755804]Phase 2250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-12Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Autologous Activated T-cells Targeting the CD19 Antigen and Containing the Inducible Caspase 9 Safety Switch in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Lymphoma [NCT03696784]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-12Recruiting
A Single Arm, Multicentre, Phase IIIB Study to Evaluate Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic (PK) of Subcutaneous (SC) Rituximab Administered During Induction Phase or Maintenance in Previously Untreated Patients With CD20+ Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma ( [NCT01889069]Phase 3159 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
An International, Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Study of BGB-3111 Compared With Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL) [NCT03336333]Phase 3590 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1B/2 Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Study Of Iberdomide (CC-220) In Combination With Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Rituximab Or Tafasitamab Or Rituximab Plus Chemotherapy For Subjects With Relapsed Or Refractory Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT04882163]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-10Withdrawn(stopped due to Business objectives have changed)
Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study of Ibrutinib, a Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor, in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic [NCT01611090]Phase 3578 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-19Completed
Dose-Intense Yttrium-90 Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin)-Containing Non-Myeloablative Conditioning for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in B-cell Malignancies [NCT01490723]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter Study of Zanubrutinib Combined With BR (Bendamustine/Rituximab) Regimen in Subjects With Newly-diagnosed Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia [NCT05979948]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-01Recruiting
Observational Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Patients Affected by Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT02491398]494 participants (Actual)Observational2016-02-29Completed
Capecitabine in Combination With Bendamustine in Women With Pretreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Her2-negative Breast Cancer, a Phase II Trial [NCT01891227]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-09Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Mutli-centre Study to Evaluate Patient Preference With Subcutaneous Administration of Rituximab Versus Intravenous Rituximab in Previously Untreated Patients With CD20+ Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma or CD20+ Follicular Non-Hodgki [NCT01724021]Phase 3743 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
A Phase 1 Study of FT522 in Combination With Rituximab in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT05950334]Phase 1322 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Recruiting
A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of CC-95266 in Subjects With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT04674813]Phase 1180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-24Recruiting
A Pilot Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab Alternating With Cytarabine and Rituximab for Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT02728531]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-18Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Idelalisib (GS-1101) in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab for Previously Treated Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas [NCT01732926]Phase 3475 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-02Terminated
Compassionate Use Re-Infusion of ATLCAR.CD30 [NCT03914885]0 participants Expanded AccessNo longer available
Phase I Dose Escalation Trial of CD19 Directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Malignancies [NCT04892277]Phase 125 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-14Recruiting
Phase II Trial to Evaluate The Efficacy of Obinutuzumab (RO5072759) + Bendamustine Treatment in Patients With Refractory Or Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT02071225]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-09Completed
Phase II Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab Plus Venetoclax in Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma Over 60 Years of Age [NCT03834688]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-13Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Bendamustine and IXAZOMIB (MLN9708) Plus Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02477215]Phase 1/Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-09Completed
A Pilot Study of a Sequential Regimen of Intensive Chemotherapy Followed by Autologous or Allogeneic Transplantation for Refractory Lymphoma (Non-Hodgkin's and Hodgkin's) and Phase 2 Expansion Cohort [NCT02059239]Phase 1/Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-04Completed
A Phase IB/II Study Evaluating The Safety, Tolerability and Anti-Tumor Activity of Polatuzumab Vedotin in Combination With Rituximab (R) or Obinutuzumab (G) Plus Bendamustine (B) in Relapsed or Refractory Follicular or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT02257567]Phase 1/Phase 2331 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-15Completed
A Phase I/II Trial of Isatuximab, Bendamustine, and Prednisone in Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT04083898]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-03Active, not recruiting
A Phase II, Open-Label Study of Obinutuzumab Plus Bendamustine (BG) in Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT02320487]Phase 2102 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00426855 (1) [back to overview]Optimal Bendamustine Dosage for Further Studies
NCT00547534 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival at 2 Years
NCT00547534 (3) [back to overview]Toxicity of Drug Combination in the Subjects
NCT00547534 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00636792 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response (Complete and Partial Response)
NCT00636792 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Response
NCT00705250 (1) [back to overview]Determine the Overall Response Rate (RR) to Bendamustine HCL in Patients With Relapsed and Primary Refractory HL.
NCT00790855 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Response
NCT00790855 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
NCT00823797 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00823797 (4) [back to overview]PFS
NCT00823797 (4) [back to overview]PFS-6
NCT00823797 (4) [back to overview]Toxic Death
NCT00834678 (7) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00834678 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival at 6 Months and 12 Months (Phase II)
NCT00834678 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00834678 (7) [back to overview]Maximum-tolerated Dose of Erlotinib Hydrochloride (Phase I)
NCT00834678 (7) [back to overview]Maximum-tolerated Dose of Bendamustine Hydrochloride (Phase I)
NCT00834678 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DR)
NCT00834678 (7) [back to overview]Dose-limiting Toxicity (Phase I)
NCT00856830 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events - Phase II
NCT00856830 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicity Regimen A - Phase I
NCT00856830 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00867503 (3) [back to overview]Toxicities of Patients Treated With Bendamustine.
NCT00867503 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Patients With Platinum and Taxane Refractory Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Cancer With Bendamustine Treatment.
NCT00867503 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival in Patients With Platinum and Taxane Refractory Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Cancer With Bendamustine Treatment.
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Participants With Disease Progression, Relapse or Death At the End of the Treatment Period or the Long-Term Follow-up Period
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in the Global Health Status Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30-item Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30)
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Therapeutic Classification of Prior Medications
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Worst Overall CTCAE Grade for Hematology Laboratory Test Results
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at the End of Treatment Period
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Worst Overall Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grades for Serum Chemistry Laboratory Test Results
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Weight
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Participants Who Died At the End of the Treatment Period or the Long-Term Follow-up Period
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs at End of Treatment Period
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at End of Treatment Period
NCT00877006 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at End of Treatment Period
NCT00891839 (6) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response
NCT00891839 (6) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Overall Survival
NCT00891839 (6) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Progression-Free Survival
NCT00891839 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (Complete Response + Partial Response) at the End of Cycles 3 and 6 Using the 2007 International Working Group Criteria
NCT00891839 (6) [back to overview]Shifts in Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
NCT00891839 (6) [back to overview]Shifts in Baseline to Post-Treatment in Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
NCT00899431 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With GVHD (Graft Versus Host Disease)
NCT00901927 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate of the Combination of BMR (Bendamustine + Mitoxantrone + Rituximab)
NCT00901927 (3) [back to overview]Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00901927 (3) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP) for Participants Treated With BMR (Bendamustine, Mitoxantrone, and Rituximab)
NCT00916058 (6) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (Phase 1)
NCT00916058 (6) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (Phase 2)
NCT00916058 (6) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (Phase 1)
NCT00916058 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (Phase 2) - Number of Participants Achieving at Least a Partial Response or Better in Disease Status at Day 100 Post-transplant
NCT00916058 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 2 Years (Phase 1)
NCT00916058 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 3 Years (Phase 2)
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With An Overall Tumor Response As Assessed By the Investigator
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Time to the First Response
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Participants' Best Tumor Response as Assessed by the Investigator
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Summary of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Progression-Free Survival
NCT00974233 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00974233 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00974233 (5) [back to overview]Toxicities Observed With Induction Chemotherapy and Maintenance Therapy
NCT00974233 (5) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (Complete + Partial Responses)
NCT00974233 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00984542 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00984542 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Each Worst-grade Toxicity
NCT00984542 (5) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00984542 (5) [back to overview]Best Response
NCT00984542 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01010568 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01010568 (3) [back to overview]Median PFS
NCT01010568 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01029730 (4) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01029730 (4) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival
NCT01029730 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01029730 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety.
NCT01049945 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (Phase II)
NCT01049945 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Phase II)
NCT01049945 (6) [back to overview]Event Free Survival (Phase II)
NCT01049945 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) (Phase II)
NCT01049945 (6) [back to overview]Dose Limiting Toxicity of Bendamustine Hydrochloride and Lenalidomide in Combination With Dexamethasone (Phase I)
NCT01049945 (6) [back to overview]Confirmed Response Rate (Dose Level 4) Reported as the Percentage of Patients Achieving a Confirmed Response (sCR, CR, VGPR, or PR).
NCT01056276 (5) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01056276 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01056276 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01056276 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experienced Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events
NCT01056276 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants by Disease Response Category in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Molecular Response in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Confirmed CR According to IWCLL 2008 Guidelines in the Second-Line Subpopulation After 6 Cycles of Therapy
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Confirmed CR According to IWCLL 2008 Guidelines in the Pooled Population After 6 Cycles of Therapy
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Confirmed Complete Response (CR) According to International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2008 Guidelines in the First-Line Subpopulation After 6 Cycles of Therapy
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of CR, CR With Incomplete Marrow Recovery (CRi), Partial Response (PR), or Nodular PR (nPR) in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS) in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Death in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing PD or Death in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing PD, Documented Intake of New Leukemia Therapy, or Death in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Documented Intake of New Leukemia Therapy in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Tumor Response of CR or CRi Experiencing PD or Death in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Proportion of Malignant B-cells in Normal B-cells Among Participants With a Positive Outcome for MRD in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Time to Next Leukemia Treatment (TNLT) in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Positive and Negative Outcome for MRD in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Tumor Response of CR, CRi, PR, or nPR Experiencing PD or Death in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Disease-Free Survival (DFS) in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01056510 (20) [back to overview]Duration of Response in the First-Line Subpopulation
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by IRC
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by Investigator
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (CFB) in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym)-Physical Well Being Sub-scale Score
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]CFB in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Generic (FACT-G) Score
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]CFB in FACT-Lym-Social/Family Well-being Sub-scale Score
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With BOR at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by Investigator
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]CFB in FACT-Lym-Lymphoma Sub-scale Score
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With BOR at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by IRC
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Definitive Improvement (DI) From Baseline in FACT-Lym Instrument Scores
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]CFB in FACT-Lym-Functional Well-Being Sub-scale Score
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]CFB in FACT-Lym-Emotional Well-Being Sub-scale Score
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR) as Assessed by IRC
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR) as Assessed by Investigator
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Disease-Free Survival (DFS) in Participants With CR as Assessed by IRC
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Disease-Free Survival (DFS) in Participants With CR as Assessed by Investigator
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]CFB in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score During Induction Phase
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]CFB in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score During Induction Phase
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]CFB in Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EuroQoL-5D/EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score During Induction Phase
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]CFB in EQ-5D VAS Score During Maintenance Phase
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]CFB in Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EuroQoL-5D/EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score During Induction Phase
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]CFB in EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score During Maintenance Phase
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]CFB in EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score During Maintenance Phase
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]CFB in EQ-5D VAS Score During Maintenance Phase
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by IRC
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]PFS as Assessed by Investigator
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]CFB in FACT-Lym Total Score
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Time to Deterioration of FACT-Lym TOI
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]CFB in FACT-Lym Trial Outcome Index (TOI)
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by IRC
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by Investigator
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by IRC
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by Investigator
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Died
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD) as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) or Death
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Number of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by Investigator
NCT01059630 (37) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) as Assessed by IRC
NCT01073163 (13) [back to overview]Worst Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 Grades for Hematology Laboratory Tests Results Overall
NCT01073163 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in QTcF at Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Bendamustine and Its Metabolites (M3 and M4)
NCT01073163 (13) [back to overview]Model-predicted Bayesian Bendamustine Clearance in the Presence of Rituximab
NCT01073163 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With New Onset ECG Waveform Morphological Changes
NCT01073163 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR)
NCT01073163 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response
NCT01073163 (13) [back to overview]Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Endpoint
NCT01073163 (13) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in QT Interval as Corrected by the Fridericia Method (QTcF) at End of Infusion
NCT01073163 (13) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in QTcF at 1 Hour Postinfusion
NCT01073163 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With QTcF New Outlier Events at End of Infusion and 1 Hour Postinfusion
NCT01073163 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Cardiac Disorders
NCT01073163 (13) [back to overview]Overview of Adverse Events
NCT01073163 (13) [back to overview]Rituximab Concentrations at 0.5 Hours, 24 Hours, and 7 Days Postinfusion
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Participants With Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Per IRC
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Reduction in Tumor Size
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Time to Next Therapy in All Participants Per IRC
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Time to Next Therapy in Participants With FL Per IRC
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Time to Progression in All Participants Per IRC
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Time to Progression in Participants With FL Per IRC
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Time to Response in All Participants Per IRC
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Time to Response in Participants With FL Per IRC
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]B-cell Monitoring (CD19+, CD20+)
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]B-cell Monitoring (CD19+, CD20+)
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Human Anti-chimeric Antibodies (HACA) Over Time
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Plasma Ofatumumab Concentrations
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]PRO - Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Measures in All Participants: The FACT-Lym
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]PRO - Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Measures in Participants With FL: The FACT-Lym
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]PRO - Change From Baseline in HRQL Measures in All Participants: The EQ-5D
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]PRO - Change From Baseline in HRQL Measures in Participants With FL: The EQ-5D
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]PRO - Change in Health Treatment in HRQL Measures in All Participants: The Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]PRO - Change in Health Treatment in HRQL Measures in Participants With FL: The Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Quantitative Assessments of Immunoglobulins A, G and M (IgA, IgG, IgM)
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Summary of Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Summary of Number of Participants With Human Anti-Human Antibodies (HAHA)
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With FL Per IRC
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With FL
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) to Optional Ofatumumab Monotherapy in Subjects Who Progressed During or Following Single-agent Bendamustine
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in All Participants
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) in All Participants Per IRC
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Duration of Response in Participants With FL Per IRC
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Duration of Response in All Participants Per IRC
NCT01077518 (29) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Lenalidomide
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Sub-study: Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohorts 1-4)
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 1, Cohorts 2 and 3, Cohort 5)
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 6)
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 7)
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 4)
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Duration of Exposure to IDELA
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Everolimus
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Bendamustine
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Toxicity of Administration of IDELA
NCT01088984 (8) [back to overview]Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D) of Bendamustine
NCT01088984 (8) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Drug Concentration by Time Curve From Time 0 Until 24 Hours After Study Drug Administration (AUC0-24) for Bendamustine and Its Metabolites (M3 and M4)
NCT01088984 (8) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Drug Concentration by Time Curve From Time 0 Until the Last Measurable Plasma Concentration (AUC0-t) for Bendamustine and Its Metabolites (M3 and M4)
NCT01088984 (8) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) for Bendamustine and Its Metabolites (M3 and M4)
NCT01088984 (8) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Tmax) for Bendamustine and Its Metabolites (M3 and M4)
NCT01088984 (8) [back to overview]Best Overall Tumor Response Rate
NCT01088984 (8) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01088984 (8) [back to overview]Best Overall Tumor Response Rate, by Phase
NCT01096992 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Bendamustine Combined With Fixed-Dose Fludarabine and Rituximab (FBR)
NCT01096992 (2) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate of Bendamustine Combined With Fixed-Dose Fludarabine and Rituximab (FBR)
NCT01108341 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), as Determined by the International Working Group (IWG) Criteria As Assessed by Investigators
NCT01108341 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), as Determined by the International Working Group (IWG) Criteria As Assessed by Investigators
NCT01110135 (1) [back to overview]Successful Mobilization and Collection of PBSCs
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]The Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Korea
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]The Maximum Drug Concentration Time (Tmax) of Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Japan
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]The Overall Response Rate [Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR)] Determined on the Basis of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]Concomitant Medication Usage
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Abnormality (Grade ≥3) in Laboratory Test Values
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Adverse Event
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Grade ≥3 Physical Examination Finding
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]The Maximum Drug Concentration Time (Tmax) of Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Korea
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Japan
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Korea
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]The Complete Response (CR) Rate Determined on the Basis of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]The Half-life Period (t1/2) of Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Japan
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]The Half-life Period (t1/2) of Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Korea
NCT01118845 (16) [back to overview]The Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Japan
NCT01133158 (2) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT01133158 (2) [back to overview]Secondary Endpoints Included an Assessment of the Following Parameters: Progression-Free Survival, Disease-Free Survival, Global Survival, Duration of the Response.
NCT01141725 (4) [back to overview]Median Survival
NCT01141725 (4) [back to overview]Incidence of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 Toxicity
NCT01141725 (4) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS)
NCT01141725 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose
NCT01165112 (4) [back to overview]Maximally Tolerated Dose of Bendamustine Hydrochloride That Can be Combined With Rituximab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoid Malignancies
NCT01165112 (4) [back to overview]Ability to Proceed to Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Collection Following Treatment (Impact of This Regimen on Stem Cell Reserve)
NCT01165112 (4) [back to overview]Safety and Toxicity of This Regimen
NCT01165112 (4) [back to overview]Preliminary Assessment of the Efficacy of This Regimen
NCT01177683 (6) [back to overview]Phase I & Phase II : Toxicity of Treatment Regimen
NCT01177683 (6) [back to overview]Phase II: Duration of Survival
NCT01177683 (6) [back to overview]Phase II: Overall Survival
NCT01177683 (6) [back to overview]Phase II: Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01177683 (6) [back to overview]Phase II : Time to Progression
NCT01177683 (6) [back to overview]Phase I: MTD of Bendamustine When Combined With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.
NCT01188681 (2) [back to overview]Response Per International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) Criteria
NCT01188681 (2) [back to overview]Response Per NCI Criteria
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]1-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at Baseline
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at End of Induction Treatment
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at Mid-treatment
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at Baseline
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]1-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at End of Induction Treatment
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]3-year Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]3-year Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]1-year Post-induction Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at Baseline
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at the End of Induction Treatment
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at Baseline
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at End of Induction Treatment
NCT01222260 (4) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01222260 (4) [back to overview]Organ Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01222260 (4) [back to overview]Overall Hematologic Response Rate (OHR)
NCT01222260 (4) [back to overview]Partial Hematologic Response (PHR) Rate
NCT01232556 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01232556 (8) [back to overview]Health Related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Questionnaire
NCT01232556 (8) [back to overview]Health Status as Assessed by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire
NCT01232556 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01232556 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With A Best Overall Response of CR, Unconfirmed CR (unCR), PR, or Unconfirmed PR (unPR) Per NCI International Response Criteria for NHL
NCT01232556 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With A Best Overall Response of CR or Partial Response (PR) Per NCI International Response Criteria for NHL
NCT01232556 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) (Safety Population)
NCT01232556 (8) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01234467 (6) [back to overview]Evaluate the Toxicity and Tolerability of Bendamustine in Combination With Rituximab
NCT01234467 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01234467 (6) [back to overview]Partial Response Rate
NCT01234467 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01234467 (6) [back to overview]Estimate of Progression-Free Survival
NCT01234467 (6) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) Rate as Defined by The International Harmonization Project for Response Criteria
NCT01234766 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Response at 3 Years
NCT01244451 (4) [back to overview]Toxicity According to CTCAE Version 4.0
NCT01244451 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01244451 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01244451 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Contributing to the Overall Response Rate
NCT01286272 (3) [back to overview]The Number of Patients Who Experienced Grade 3+ Hematologic and Non-hematologic Adverse Events at Least Possibly Related to Treatment
NCT01286272 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01286272 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01294579 (6) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression Free Survival up to 30 Months (FAS)
NCT01294579 (6) [back to overview]All Deaths by Preferred Term (Safety Set) up to Approximately 30 Months
NCT01294579 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) up to 30 Months (FAS)
NCT01294579 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) During Induction Phase After Cycle 6 (FAS)
NCT01294579 (6) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate of Induction Therapy After Cycle 6 (28 Days) (FAS)
NCT01294579 (6) [back to overview]Conversion Rate of Partial Response in Induction Phase to Complete Response With Maintenance Ofatumumab (FAS)
NCT01300247 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive
NCT01300247 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response, Assessed According to International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) Guidelines
NCT01300247 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Human Anti-Human Antibodies (HAHAs)
NCT01300247 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Had B-Cell Recovery
NCT01300247 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Had B-Cell Depletion
NCT01300247 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Progression Free
NCT01300247 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Objective Response (DOR), Assessed by the Investigator According to IWCLL Guidelines
NCT01317901 (1) [back to overview]Response
NCT01326702 (7) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Veliparib When Combined With Bendamustine Hydrochloride
NCT01326702 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Using RECIST Version 1.1 (Phase IIa)
NCT01326702 (7) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) to Study Treatment (Phase IIa)
NCT01326702 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01326702 (7) [back to overview]Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities
NCT01326702 (7) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Veliparib (Phase Ib)
NCT01326702 (7) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Summary Score (Follicular Lymphoma Population) During Follow Up Phase
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Complete Response (Overall Study Population), Investigator-Assessed
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in All Domains of FACT-G (Follicular Lymphoma Population)
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Time to Next Anti-Lymphoma Treatment (Overall Study Population)
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Time to Next Anti-Lymphoma Treatment (Follicular Lymphoma Population)
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival in the Follicular Lymphoma Population, Investigator-Assessed
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival in the Follicular Lymphoma Population, Investigator-Assessed
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (Overall Study Population), Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Overall Study Population)
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Disease-Free Survival (Overall Study Population)
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Overall Response (Overall Study Population), IRC-Assessed
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Overall Response (Overall Study Population), Investigator-Assessed
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) (Overall Study Population), Investigator-Assessed
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) (Follicular Lymphoma Population), Investigator-Assessed
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Complete Response (Follicular Lymphoma Population), IRC-Assessed
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Disease-Free Survival (Follicular Lymphoma Population)
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (Follicular Lymphoma Population)
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (Overall Study Population)
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Overall Response (Follicular Lymphoma Population), IRC-Assessed
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Overall Response (Follicular Lymphoma Population), Investigator-Assessed
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Follicular Lymphoma Population)
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Complete Response (Overall Study Population), IRC-Assessed
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (Follicular Lymphoma Population), IRC-Assessed
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Complete Response (Follicular Lymphoma Population), Investigator-Assessed
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Total Score (Follicular Population)
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival in the Overall Study Population, Investigator-Assessed
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FACT-Lym Individual Subscale Lymphoma Score (Follicular Population)
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Summary Score (Follicular Lymphoma Population) During Maintenance/Observation Phase
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Summary Score (Follicular Lymphoma Population) During Induction Phase
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Summary Score (Follicular Lymphoma Population) During Induction Phase
NCT01332968 (32) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FACT-Lym Total Outcome Index (TOI) Score (Follicular Lymphoma Population)
NCT01369849 (7) [back to overview]Number of Phase I Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicity Events (Phase I)
NCT01369849 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01369849 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Complete Response Defined to be a CR or CRi Noted as the Objective Status (Phase II)
NCT01369849 (7) [back to overview]Treatment-free Survival
NCT01369849 (7) [back to overview]Biomarker Analysis (CD38, CD49d, and ZAP-70)
NCT01369849 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01369849 (7) [back to overview]Minimal-residual Disease
NCT01412879 (4) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01412879 (4) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 2 Years
NCT01412879 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate (Complete and Partial Response)
NCT01412879 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT01438177 (3) [back to overview]Median Duration of Response of This Regimen
NCT01438177 (3) [back to overview]Response Rate (CR + PR After 2 Cycles)
NCT01438177 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Grade 3 or Higher
NCT01458366 (8) [back to overview]Overall Safety and Tolerability of the Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide
NCT01458366 (8) [back to overview]Overall Proportion of Patients Who Are Able to Undergo Stem Cell Transplant (SCT)
NCT01458366 (8) [back to overview]Overall Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR) Rate
NCT01458366 (8) [back to overview]Overall Progression-Free Survival
NCT01458366 (8) [back to overview]Overall Frequency of Response With Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide at Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
NCT01458366 (8) [back to overview]Total Overall Survival for Transplant vs Non-transplant
NCT01458366 (8) [back to overview]Phase I: Overall Frequency of Response
NCT01458366 (8) [back to overview]Phase I: Maximum-Tolerated Dose of Bendamustine in Combination With Ofatumumab, Carboplatin and Etoposide (BOCE)
NCT01466153 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Developed Detectable Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)
NCT01466153 (13) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT01466153 (13) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01466153 (13) [back to overview]Terminal Half Life (t1/2) of MEDI-551
NCT01466153 (13) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression (TTP)
NCT01466153 (13) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT01466153 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as AEs
NCT01466153 (13) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01466153 (13) [back to overview]Minimal Residual Disease Negative Complete Response (CR) Rate
NCT01466153 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as AEs
NCT01466153 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram Reported as AEs
NCT01466153 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
NCT01466153 (13) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01490723 (2) [back to overview]Treatment-Related Mortality (TRM)
NCT01490723 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01491841 (5) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT01491841 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01491841 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01491841 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose
NCT01491841 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response
NCT01500083 (1) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Investigator-assessed Kaplan-meier Estimates of Time to Response
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA) Disease
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event of Infection
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Time to Next Therapy
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD5-CD19+ Cell Counts up to 36 Months
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD5+CD19+ Cell Counts up to 36 Months
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies to End of Study Treatment
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Maximum Decrease in Sum of the Product of the Diameter (SPD) From Baseline in Participants With Lymphadenopathy at Baseline
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Were Negative or Positive for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) and Achieved a Bone Marrow Biopsy Confirmed Complete Response (CR) up to 36-Month Follow-up
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Adverse Event of Any Infusion Reactions (IR) or Serious Infusion Reactions (SIR)
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Investigator-assessed of Kaplan-meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Response (CR) With and Without a CT Scan Assessment After the Last Dose of Study Treatment, as Assessed by the Investigator
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Zeta-chain-associated Protein Kinase (ZAP) 70 Testing at Baseline Who Also Had a Clinical Response After Last Dose of Study Treatment
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Reduction in Organomegaly (Spleen and Liver)
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable Region (IgVH) Testing at Baseline Who Also Had a Clinical Response After Last Dose of Study Treatment
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 or Grade 4 Myelosuppression (Anemia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia), as Assessed by the Investigator
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Cytogenetics Testing at Baseline Who Also Had a Clinical Response After Last Dose of Study Treatment
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Constitutional or B-symptoms
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Beta 2 Microglobulin (B2M) at Baseline Who Also Had a Clinical Response After the Last Dose of Study Treatment
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the Investigator
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR) With Computed Tomography (CT) Scan (CT Scan) Assessment, as Assessed by the Investigator
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Confirmed Positive Response for Human Anti-human Antibodies (HAHA) at the Indicated Time Points
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Investigator-assessed Kaplan-meier Estimates of Duration of Response
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Investigator-assessed Kaplan-meier Estimates of Overall Survival
NCT01520922 (28) [back to overview]Investigator-Assessed Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Progression
NCT01535924 (2) [back to overview]Adverse Events in Terms of Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) and MTD of Bendamustine Hydrochloride (Phase I)
NCT01535924 (2) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) of Bendamustine Hydrochloride and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma (Phase II)
NCT01569295 (5) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01569295 (5) [back to overview]Lymph Node Response Rate
NCT01569295 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01569295 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01569295 (5) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01596621 (13) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Bendamustine
NCT01596621 (13) [back to overview]Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of Bendamustine
NCT01596621 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) (Assessed by IRC)
NCT01596621 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01596621 (13) [back to overview]Rate Constant for Elimination (λz) of Bendamustine
NCT01596621 (13) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Measurable Drug Concentration (AUC0-t) of Bendamustine
NCT01596621 (13) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (Assessed by IRC)
NCT01596621 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of the AUC0-∞ Based on Extrapolation (%AUCext)
NCT01596621 (13) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Assessed by Independent Review Committee [IRC])
NCT01596621 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Concomitant Medication Usage
NCT01596621 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Need At Least 1 Hematologic Supportive Care (Plasma, Blood Cells, or Cytokines)
NCT01596621 (13) [back to overview]Half-Life (t½) of Bendamustine
NCT01596621 (13) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) of Bendamustine
NCT01611090 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale at End of Treatment
NCT01611090 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue Scale at End of Treatment
NCT01611090 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Score at End of Treatment
NCT01611090 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Received Subsequent Antineoplastic Therapy
NCT01611090 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Shifts in Disease-Related Symptoms
NCT01611090 (14) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01611090 (14) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01611090 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Response
NCT01611090 (14) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01611090 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CLL 16 Domain Scores at End of Treatment
NCT01611090 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Sustained Hematologic Improvement
NCT01611090 (14) [back to overview]Median Time to Clinically Meaningful Improvement in FACIT-Fatigue Scale
NCT01611090 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Beta2 Microglobulin at End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT01611090 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score Scale at End of Treatment
NCT01626352 (7) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT01626352 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01626352 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01626352 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response (OR)
NCT01626352 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) as a Measure of Safety
NCT01626352 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With a Complete Response
NCT01626352 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01661881 (3) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate After 6 Cycles
NCT01661881 (3) [back to overview]Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) Rate
NCT01661881 (3) [back to overview]1 Year Progression-Free Survival
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Anti-Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) Antibodies Over Time
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Indicating a Preference for Rituximab Subcutaneous (SC) Over Rituximab Intravenously (IV) at Cycle 6
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview]Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Score
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Indicating a Preference for Rituximab Subcutaneous (SC) Over Rituximab Intravenously (IV) at Cycle 8
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) Rate
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS)
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview]Summary of Observed Serum Rituximab Concentration
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview]Rituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) Score
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Anti-Rituximab Antibodies Over Time
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview]Time Required for Rituximab Administration (Subcutaneous [SC] or Intravenous [IV])
NCT01754402 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Pomalidomide and Bendamustine
NCT01754402 (2) [back to overview]Initial Response Rate
NCT01754857 (2) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT01754857 (2) [back to overview]Count of Events Related to Toxicity
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Ibrutinib
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Time-to-Next Treatment
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Oral Volume of Distribution at Steady State of Ibrutinib
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Response (DoCR)
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Curve of Ibrutinib During 24 Hours After Dosing at Steady State
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration of Ibrutinib
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Response Rate
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Oral Plasma Clearance (CL/F) of Ibrutinib
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Time to Worsening (TTW) in the Lymphoma (Lym) Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Questionnaire
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT01776840 (16) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01874054 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01874054 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Dose-limiting Toxicities
NCT01874054 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01874054 (5) [back to overview]Complete Remission Rate
NCT01874054 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01886872 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving a Biopsy-proven Complete Response (CR)
NCT01886872 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) (Complete Response [CR], CCR, Nodular Partial Response [nPR], Partial Response [PR], and PRL)
NCT01886872 (9) [back to overview]The Rate of Grade 3, 4, or 5 Treatment-related Non-hematologic Adverse Events (Toxicities)
NCT01886872 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) at 2 Years
NCT01886872 (9) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 2 Years
NCT01886872 (9) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01886872 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving Any Response to Treatment (Overall Response Rate [ORR] [Complete Response [CR], CCR, Nodular Partial Response [nPR], Partial Response [PR], and PRL])
NCT01886872 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving Complete (CR and CCR) or Nodular Partial Response (nPR)
NCT01886872 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Attain Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Status
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]FL: Plasma Trough Concentrations of Rituximab in Participants With Complete Response/Complete Response Unconfirmed (CR/CRu)
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]FL: Plasma Trough Concentrations of Rituximab
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]DLBCL: Plasma Trough Concentrations of Rituximab in Participants With Complete Response/Complete Response Unconfirmed (CR/CRu)
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]DLBCL: Plasma Trough Concentrations of Rituximab
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]DLBCL: Plasma Concentrations of Rituximab
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]DLBCL: Plasma Concentrations During Different Scheduling of Rituximab SC R-CHOP-14 or R-CHOP-21
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]DLBCL: Plasma Concentrations During Different Scheduling of Rituximab SC R-CHOP-14 or R-CHOP-21
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to IWG Response Criteria
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Event-Free Survival (EFS) According to IWG Response Criteria
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease-Free Survival (DFS) According to IWG Response Criteria
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) According to IWG Response Criteria
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With At Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With At Least One Grade ≥ 3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With At Least One Grade ≥ 3 Infusion/ Injection Related Reactions (IIRRs)
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]FL: Overall Geometric Least Square (LS) Mean Plasma Trough Concentrations of Rituximab
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]DLBCL: Overall Geometric Least Square (LS) Mean Plasma Trough Concentrations of Rituximab
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]DLBCL: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Rituximab
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]DLBCL: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Rituximab
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]DLBCL: Apparent Total Clearance (CL/F) of Rituximab
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]Rituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) Convenience and Satisfaction Domain Scores
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]Rituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) Convenience and Satisfaction Domain Scores
NCT01889069 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Administration-Associated Reactions (AAR)
NCT01905943 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Particular Interest (AEPIs)
NCT01905943 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01905943 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR) at Final Response Assessment (FRA)
NCT01905943 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)
NCT01905943 (12) [back to overview]Median Time to Response (TTR)
NCT01905943 (12) [back to overview]Median Time to Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01905943 (12) [back to overview]Median Time to New Anti-Leukemia Therapy (TTNT)
NCT01905943 (12) [back to overview]Median Time to Event-Free Survival (EFS)
NCT01905943 (12) [back to overview]Median Time to Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT01905943 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negativity as Assessed by Flow Cytometry
NCT01905943 (12) [back to overview]Median Time to Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01905943 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
NCT01974440 (14) [back to overview]Primary Analysis: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01974440 (14) [back to overview]Primary Analysis: Complete Response Rate (CRR): Stratified Analysis
NCT01974440 (14) [back to overview]Primary Analysis: Duration of Response (DOR): Stratified Analysis
NCT01974440 (14) [back to overview]Supplementary Analysis: Progression Free Survival: Unstratified Analysis - Participants With Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL)
NCT01974440 (14) [back to overview]Primary Analysis: Overall Response Rate (ORR): Stratified Analysis
NCT01974440 (14) [back to overview]Primary Analysis: Overall Survival (OS): Stratified Analysis
NCT01974440 (14) [back to overview]Primary Analysis: Progression Free Survival (PFS): Stratified Analysis
NCT01974440 (14) [back to overview]Primary Analysis: Time to Worsening (TTW) in the Lymphoma (Lym) Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma Subscale (FACT-LymS) Questionnaire
NCT01974440 (14) [back to overview]Supplementary Analysis: Duration of Response: Unstratified Analysis - Participants With MZL
NCT01974440 (14) [back to overview]Supplementary Analysis: Number of Participants With TEAEs: Participants With MZL
NCT01974440 (14) [back to overview]Supplementary Analysis: Overall Response Rate: Unstratified Analysis - Participants With MZL
NCT01974440 (14) [back to overview]Supplementary Analysis: Overall Survival: Unstratified Analysis - Participants With MZL
NCT01974440 (14) [back to overview]Supplementary Analysis: Time to Worsening (TTW) in the Lymphoma (Lym) Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma Subscale (FACT-LymS) Questionnaire: Participants With MZL
NCT01974440 (14) [back to overview]Supplementary Analysis: Complete Response Rate: Unstratified Analysis - Participants With MZL
NCT01980888 (1) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by the Investigator Using Standard iwCLL Guidelines in Participants With 17p Deletion as Identified by Fluorescence In-situ Hybridization (FISH) Test
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) Using Standard iwCLL Guidelines
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With PD as Assessed by the Investigator Using Standard International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) Guidelines or Death
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response of CR, Cri, nPR, or PR at End of Combination Treatment Visit as Assessed by the IRC Using iwCLL Guidelines
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response of CR, Cri, nPR, or PR at End of Combination Treatment Visit as Assessed by the Investigator Using iwCLL Guidelines
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With MRD Negativity in Bone Marrow
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity in Peripheral Blood
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response of CR, CRi, nPR, or PR as Assessed by the IRC Using iwCLL Guidelines
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Duration of Responses (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator Using iwCLL Guidelines
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Died
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Using iwCLL Guidelines
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With PD or Death Among Participants With Best Overall Response of CR, CRi, nPR, or PR as Assessed by the Investigator Using iwCLL Guidelines
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Time to New Anti-CLL Treatment (TTNT) as Assessed by the Investigator
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Plasma Venetoclax Concentrations
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), CR With Incomplete Bone Marrow Recovery (CRi), Nodular Partial Response (nPR), or Partial Response (PR) as Assessed by the Investigator Using iwCLL Guidelines
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) and Infusion-related Reactions (IRRs)
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Monroe Dunaway (MD) Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) Core Symptom Severity, Module Symptom Severity, and Interference Scores
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HRQoL as Measured by Quality of Life Questionnaire Associated CLL Module (QLQ-CLL16) Multi-Item Scales Score
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HRQoL as Measured by Quality of Life Questionnaire Associated CLL Module (QLQ-CLL16) Multi-Item Scales Score
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HRQoL as Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Functional Scales Score and Global Health Status/Global Quality-of-Life (QoL) Scale Score
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HRQoL as Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Functional Scales Score and Global Health Status/Global Quality-of-Life (QoL) Scale Score
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Using Standard iwCLL Guidelines
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]PFS as Assessed by the IRC Using Standard iwCLL Guidelines in Participants With 17p Deletion as Identified by FISH Test
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]PFS as Assessed by the IRC Using Standard iwCLL Guidelines
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]PFS as Assessed by the Investigator Using Standard iwCLL Guidelines in Participants With 17p Deletion as Identified by FISH Test
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Start of New Anti-CLL Treatment or Death as Assessed by the Investigator
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With PD/Relapse, Start of a New Anti-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Therapy, or Death as Assessed by the Investigator Using iwCLL Guidelines
NCT02005471 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by the IRC Using Standard iwCLL Guidelines in Participants With 17p Deletion as Identified by FISH Test
NCT02059239 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients Achieving Neutrophil Engraftment
NCT02059239 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients Achieving Platelet Engraftment
NCT02059239 (8) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival After Stem Cell Transplant
NCT02059239 (8) [back to overview]Transplant-Related Mortality
NCT02059239 (8) [back to overview]Disease Response 30 Days Post-Transplant
NCT02059239 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival at Day 365 Post-Transplant
NCT02059239 (8) [back to overview]Disease Response at 1 Year Post-Transplant
NCT02059239 (8) [back to overview]Disease Response Following Salvage Chemotherapy
NCT02071225 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Infusion-related Reactions (IRRs)
NCT02071225 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Previous/Concomitant Diseases
NCT02071225 (15) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02071225 (15) [back to overview]Best Response Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Using the IWCLL 2008 Criteria
NCT02071225 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02071225 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity
NCT02071225 (15) [back to overview]Time to Re-treatment/New Anti-leukemia Therapy
NCT02071225 (15) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS)
NCT02071225 (15) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator Using the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2008 Criteria
NCT02071225 (15) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DR)
NCT02071225 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With AEs of Special Interest (AESIs)
NCT02071225 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Medication
NCT02071225 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02071225 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Prematurely
NCT02071225 (15) [back to overview]Event Free Survival (EFS)
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CMR According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET Scan at Year 1
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CMR According to IRC as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET Scan at Year 1
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Metabolic Response (CMR) According to Independent Review Committee (IRC) as Per Lugano Classification, Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan at Primary Response Assessment (PRA)
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression (According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET or CT Scan) or Death
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression (According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET or CT Scan), Death, or Start of a New Anti-lymphoma Therapy
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With OR According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET or CT Scan
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET or CT Scan
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) According to IRC as Per Lugano Classification, Using Computed Tomography (CT) Scan
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using CT Scan
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) According to IRC as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET Scan
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With OR According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using CT Scan
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With OR According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET Scan
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With OR According to IRC as Per Lugano Classification, Using CT Scan
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Venetoclax
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 8 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-8h) of Venetoclax
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Observed Concentration (AUClast) of Venetoclax
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET or CT Scan
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS) According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET or CT Scan
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Venetoclax
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause
NCT02187861 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CMR According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET Scan at PRA
NCT02224729 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade 3-4 Adverse Events From the Combination of Bendamustine Hydrochloride, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Based on the Common Terminology Criteria Version 4.0
NCT02224729 (5) [back to overview]Count of Participants That Experience Overall Response Following 4 Cycles of the Combination Regimen BBd
NCT02224729 (5) [back to overview]Count of Participants That Experience Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02224729 (5) [back to overview]Count of Participants That Experience Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT02224729 (5) [back to overview]Count of Participants That Experience Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR)
NCT02257242 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Completed Six Cycles of Study Treatment
NCT02257242 (3) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose
NCT02257242 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase Ib: Vss of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Obinutuzumab in Cohort 1b
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: Vss of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine and Rituximab in Arms A and C
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: Vss of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine and Obinutuzumab in Arms E and F
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: Vss of Bendamustine and Rituximab in Arms B and D
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: Cmax of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Obinutuzumab and Bendamustine in Arms E and F
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: Cmax of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Rituximab in Arms A and C
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: Cmax of Bendamustine and Rituximab in Arms B and D
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: CL of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine and Rituximab in Arms A and C
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: CL of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine and Obinutuzumab in Arms E and F
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: CL of Bendamustine and Rituximab in Arms B and D
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: AUCinf of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Rituximab in Arms A and C
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: AUCinf of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Obinutuzumab in Arms E and F
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: AUCinf of Bendamustine and Rituximab in Arms B and D
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Bendamustine
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: acMMAE
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: acMMAE
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: acMMAE
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: acMMAE
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: acMMAE
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: Percentage of Participants With OR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by Investigator
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Arm H (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by the IRC
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With AEs
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With OR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by IRC
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With OR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by Investigator
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by the IRC
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by IRC
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by Investigator
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: acMMAE
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Unconjugated MMAE
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Unconjugated MMAE
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Unconjugated MMAE
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of Obinutuzumab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Unconjugated MMAE
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Unconjugated MMAE
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Unconjugated MMAE
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of Obinutuzumab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of Obinutuzumab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of Obinutuzumab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase Ib: Vss of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Obinutuzumab in Cohort 1a
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase Ib: Cmax of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Rituximab in Cohort 1a
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase Ib: Cmax of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Obinutuzumab in Cohort 1b
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase Ib: CL of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Rituximab in Cohort 1a
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase Ib: CL of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Obinutuzumab in Cohort 1b
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Total Ab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Total Ab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Total Ab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Total Ab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Total Ab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Total Ab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of Rituximab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of Rituximab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of Rituximab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Symptom Severity and Interference According to Therapy-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Score (TINAS) in Arms A-F
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Symptom Severity and Interference According to Therapy-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Score (TINAS) in Arms A-F
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Symptom Severity and Interference According to Therapy-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Score (TINAS) in Arms A-F
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Symptom Severity and Interference According to Therapy-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Score (TINAS) in Arms A-F
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase Ib: AUCinf of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Obinutuzumab in Cohort 1b
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase Ib: AUC From Time Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Rituximab in Cohort 1a
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Cohort 1b (Phase Ib): Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent ADAs to Polatuzumab Vedotin and Obinutuzumab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Cohort 1a (Phase Ib): Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Polatuzumab Vedotin
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Arms G+H: (Phase II NF Cohorts): Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent ADAs to Polatuzumab Vedotin (Lyophilized)
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Arms E and F (Phase II): Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent ADAs to Polatuzumab Vedotin and Obinutuzumab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Arms A and C (Phase II): Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent ADAs to Polatuzumab Vedotin
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohorts): Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Unconjugated MMAE
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohorts): Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Total Ab
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohorts): Plasma Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: acMMAE
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Polatuzumab Vedotin (Lyophilized)
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Area Under Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Polatuzumab Vedotin (Lyophilized)
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: Percentage of Participants With OR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by IRC
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: Percentage of Participants With OR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by IRC
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Symptom Severity and Interference According to Therapy-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Score (TINAS) in Arms A-F
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by Investigator
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by the Investigator
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by IRC
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by Investigator
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Best Objective Response (BOR) Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the Investigator
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II: Percentage of Participants With AEs
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II Randomized and NF Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at Primary Response Assessment (PRA) Based on Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-Computed Tomography (CT) Scan as Determined by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II NF Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With BOR Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the IRC
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II NF Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With BOR Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the Investigator
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II NF Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II NF Cohort: PFS Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the IRC
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II NF Cohort: PFS Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the Investigator
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II NF Cohort: Percentage of Participants With OR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by IRC
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II NF Cohort: Percentage of Participants With OR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by Investigator
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II NF Cohort: Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by the Investigator
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II NF Cohort: Event-Free Survival (EFS) Based on PET-CT or CT Only, as Determined by the Investigator
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II NF Cohort: DOR Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the IRC
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II NF Cohort: DOR Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the Investigator
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase II Expansion Cohorts and Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by the IRC
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]Phase Ib: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]DLBCL Cohorts: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the Investigator
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]DLBCL Cohorts: PFS Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the IRC
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]DLBCL Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With BOR Based PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by IRC
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]DLBCL Cohorts: Duration of Response (DOR) Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the Investigator
NCT02257567 (96) [back to overview]DLBCL Cohorts: DOR Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the IRC
NCT02320487 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 16 (QLQ-CLL16) Score
NCT02320487 (15) [back to overview]Time to MRD-Negative Status in Peripheral Blood
NCT02320487 (15) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS), as Determined by the Investigator Using iwCLL NCI-WG Guidelines
NCT02320487 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response of CR or Partial Response (PR) at the End of Induction Therapy, as Determined by the Investigator Using iwCLL NCI-WG Guidelines
NCT02320487 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), as Determined by the Investigator Using International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia National Cancer Institute-Working Group (iwCLL NCI-WG) Guidelines
NCT02320487 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02320487 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02320487 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MRD-Negative Status in Peripheral Blood at Any Time During the Study
NCT02320487 (15) [back to overview]Number of Hospitalizations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02320487 (15) [back to overview]Minimum Observed Concentration (Ctrough) of Obinutuzumab After Cycle 2
NCT02320487 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Status in Bone Marrow at Any Time During the Study
NCT02320487 (15) [back to overview]Duration of Response Among Participants With Objective Response of CR or PR, as Determined by the Investigator Using iwCLL NCI-WG Guidelines
NCT02320487 (15) [back to overview]Duration of MRD-Negativity in Peripheral Blood Among Participants Who Achieved MRD-Negative Status
NCT02320487 (15) [back to overview]Ctrough of Obinutuzumab After Cycle 4
NCT02320487 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Score
NCT02420210 (1) [back to overview]ORR (PR + CR) Using the Cheson et al Parameters
NCT02424851 (5) [back to overview]Renal Response After Two Cycles of Trial Treatment
NCT02424851 (5) [back to overview]Quality of Life Measured by the EQ-5D-3L Questionnaire at Baseline and 1 Month Follow up
NCT02424851 (5) [back to overview]Haematological and Non-haematological Toxicity in Both Treatment Arms
NCT02424851 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02424851 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With >50% Reduction From Baseline in Serum Free Light Chain
NCT02477215 (7) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT02477215 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT02477215 (7) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Bendamustine
NCT02477215 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT02477215 (7) [back to overview]Cumulative Response Rates in Patients After Eight Cycles.
NCT02477215 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02477215 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02594163 (6) [back to overview]Number and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02594163 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT02594163 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02594163 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02594163 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT02594163 (6) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at End of Induction (EOI), as Determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) Using Modified Lugano 2014 Criteria
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (CR or PR) at EOI, as Determined by the Investigator Using Modified Cheson 2007 Criteria
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (CR or PR) at EOI, as Determined by the Investigator Using Lugano 2014 Criteria
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR at EOI, as Determined by the IRC Using Modified Cheson 2007 Criteria
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (CR or PR) at EOI, as Determined by the IRC Using Modified Cheson 2007 Criteria
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Observed Serum Atezolizumab Concentration
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR at EOI, as Determined by the Investigator Using Modified Cheson 2007 Criteria
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR at EOI, as Determined by the Investigator Using Lugano 2014 Criteria
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (CR or PR) at EOI, as Determined by the IRC Using Lugano 2014 Criteria
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Human Anti-Human Antibodies (HAHAs) to Obinutuzumab
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Observed Serum Atezolizumab Concentration
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Human Anti-Chimeric Antibodies (HACAs) to Rituximab
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to Atezolizumab
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to Atezolizumab
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Observed Serum Rituximab Concentration
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Observed Serum Obinutuzumab Concentration
NCT02596971 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Response of CR or PR During Study, as Determined by Investigator Using Modified Cheson 2007 Criteria
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Durvalumab
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) During Durvalumab Treatment
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate During the Entire Study
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Part 1: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Phase Half-Life (t½) of Durvalumab
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Time to First Response
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Durvalumab
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution (Vz) of Durvalumab
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lenalidomide
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) - Extended Collection
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Ibrutinib
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Lenalidomide
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) of Durvalumab
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Durvalumab
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Ibrutinib
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Ibrutinib
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Lenalidomide
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Clearance (CL) of Durvalumab
NCT02733042 (21) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response
NCT02853370 (8) [back to overview]3-years Overall Survival Rate
NCT02853370 (8) [back to overview]3-year Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02853370 (8) [back to overview]3-years Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT02853370 (8) [back to overview]3-years Event Free Survival (EFS)
NCT02853370 (8) [back to overview]5 Years Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02853370 (8) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate (CRR)
NCT02853370 (8) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02853370 (8) [back to overview]5 Years Progression Free Survival (PFS) -
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3, As Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Time to Tumor Response (TTR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
NCT02954406 (8) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for TAK-659
NCT02954406 (8) [back to overview]AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve During Dosing Interval
NCT02954406 (8) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT02954406 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT02954406 (8) [back to overview]Dose Escalation Phase: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of TAK-659
NCT02954406 (8) [back to overview]Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration for TAK-659
NCT02954406 (8) [back to overview]Dose Escalation Phase: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of TAK-659
NCT02954406 (8) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02970318 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) Per Investigator Assessment Based on 03 September 2021 Data Cutoff
NCT02970318 (8) [back to overview]Time to Next Treatment (TTNT) Based on 03 September 2021 Data Cutoff
NCT02970318 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment Based on 15 January 2019 Data Cutoff From Interim Analysis.
NCT02970318 (8) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Investigator Assessment
NCT02970318 (8) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment
NCT02970318 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02970318 (8) [back to overview]IRC-assessed Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per IWCLL 2008 Criteria Based on Data Cutoff 15 January 2019 From Interim Analysis
NCT02970318 (8) [back to overview]Investigator Assessed Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per IWCLL 2008 Criteria Based on Data Cutoff 03 September 2021
NCT03336333 (1) [back to overview]Cohort 1: Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Determined by Independent Central Review (ICR)
NCT03406156 (8) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT03406156 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT03406156 (8) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03406156 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03406156 (8) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03406156 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Tumor Burden Status With Induction of Obinutuzumab or Obinutuzumab Plus Bendamustine (Debulking Period)
NCT03406156 (8) [back to overview]Undetectable Minimal Residual Disease (UMRD) Rate
NCT03406156 (8) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT03623373 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR = Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR)) of Subjects
NCT03623373 (4) [back to overview]Pre-transplant Complete Response Rate
NCT03623373 (4) [back to overview]Stem Cell Mobilization Success Rate With Cytarabine and Rituximab
NCT03623373 (4) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability of Regimen in Subjects With MCL as Measured by Treatment Related Non-hematologic Toxicity of Grade 3 or Higher
NCT03817853 (8) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) at the End of Induction (EOI) Therapy
NCT03817853 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of IRRs Regardless of Grade by Cycle
NCT03817853 (8) [back to overview]Type of Grade >=3 IRRs Associated With the Obinutuzumab Administered as an SDI by Cycle
NCT03817853 (8) [back to overview]Duration (In Minutes) of Obinutuzumab Administration by Cycle
NCT03817853 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Grade >=3 IRRs Associated With the Obinutuzumab Administered as an SDI by Cycle
NCT03817853 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Grade >=3 Infusion-Related Reactions (IRRs) During Cycle 2 in Patients Who Had Previously Received Obinutuzumab at the Standard Infusion Rate During Cycle 1 Without Experiencing a Grade 3 or 4 IRR
NCT03817853 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT03817853 (8) [back to overview]Time to IRR From Infusion to Onset of the IRR During Cycle 2
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Positive Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Polatuzumab Vedotin
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Assessed by Investigator
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at the End of Treatment (EOT) Assessment Based on Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Antibody-Conjugated Monomethyl Auristatin E (acMMAE) at Specified Timepoints
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Assessed by IRC
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]DOR Based on PET-CT/CT Only as Assessed by IRC
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Duration Of Response (DOR) Based on PET-CT/CT Only as Assessed by Investigator
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS) Based on PET-CT or CT Assessed by Investigator
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR at EOT Based on Computed Tomography (CT) as Assessed by Investigator
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR at EOT Based on CT as Assessed by IRC
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on PET-CT/CT Only as Assessed by Investigator
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR at the EOT Assessment Based on PET-CT as Assessed by Investigator
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) at EOT Based on PET-CT as Assessed by Investigator
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With OR at EOT Assessment Based on CT as Assessed by Investigator
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With OR at EOT Assessment Based on CT as Assessed by IRC
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With OR at EOT Based on PET-CT as Assessed by IRC
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]PFS Based on PET-CT/CT Only as Assessed by IRC
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Serum Concentration of Total Antibody at Specified Timepoints
NCT04236141 (21) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Unconjugated Monomethyl Auristatin E (MMAE) at Specified Timepoints
NCT04745832 (2) [back to overview]Number of SAEs (Zandelisib When Combined With Rituximab)
NCT04745832 (2) [back to overview]Number of Treatment Emergent AEs (Zandelisib When Combined With Rituximab)

Optimal Bendamustine Dosage for Further Studies

(NCT00426855)
Timeframe: Three weeks after treatment termination

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Group 160

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival at 2 Years

To determine the progression-free survival following treatment with the BVR combination in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent and mantle cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. (NCT00547534)
Timeframe: Two years

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Lymphoma Subjects13

[back to top]

Toxicity of Drug Combination in the Subjects

(NCT00547534)
Timeframe: Two years

InterventionLymphoma Subjects (Number)
Lymphoma Subjects13

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Overall response rate (ORR)to protocol treatment - Partial response, Complete response, etc. (NCT00547534)
Timeframe: Two years

InterventionLymphoma Subjects (Number)
Lymphoma Subjects13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response (Complete and Partial Response)

Response is assessed by investigator according to International Working Group (IWG) criteria. Complete response requires disappearance of all evidence of disease. Partial response requires regression of measurable disease and no new sites. (NCT00636792)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last subject completes their end of treatment visit

Interventionparticipants (Number)
VELCADE, Bendamustine, Rituximab (VBR) Treatment53

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Response

Response is assessed by investigator according to International Working Group (IWG) criteria. Complete response requires disappearance of all evidence of disease. (NCT00636792)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last subject completes their end of treatment visit.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
VELCADE, Bendamustine, Rituximab (VBR) Treatment32

[back to top]

Determine the Overall Response Rate (RR) to Bendamustine HCL in Patients With Relapsed and Primary Refractory HL.

The percentage of evaluable participants who achieved either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR Disappearance of all evidence of disease. (a) FDGavid or PET positive prior to therapy; mass of any size permitted if PET negative (b) Variably FDG-avid or PET negative; regression to normal size on CT. PR Regression of measurable disease and no new sites. > or = to 50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 largest dominant masses; no increase in size of other nodes (a) FDG-avid or PET positive prior to therapy; one or more PET positive at previously involved site (b) Variably FDG-avid or PET negative; regression on CT. (NCT00705250)
Timeframe: up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of evaluable participants (Number)
All Participants56

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Response

A complete response (CR) is defined as normalization of the bone marrow and peripheral blood counts with /= 10^9/L and a platelet count of >/=100 X 10^9/L. A partial response (PR) was defined as for CR, but with only >/=50% reduction of marrow blasts and to a range of 6%-25%. A marrow complete response was defined as a reduction of marrow blasts to NCT00790855)
Timeframe: 1 - 24 week cycles (up to 8 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseMarrow Complete Response
Bendamustine (75 mg/m^2)001

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

The MTD is the highest dose level in which <2 patients of 6 develop first cycle dose limiting toxicity (DLT). MTD assessed during course 1 (4 week cycle), every 3-7 days. (NCT00790855)
Timeframe: During course 1 (4 week cycle)

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Bendamustine75

[back to top]

Overall Survival

*inclusive of subjects still alive at time of last reporting. (NCT00823797)
Timeframe: Until death or last reported survival

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Bendamustine Hydrochloride) for Glioblastoma18.3
Treatment (Bendamustine Hydrochloride) for Anaplastic Glioma45.6

[back to top]

PFS

Defined as the time from date of initial therapy to first objective documentation of tumor progression or death. (NCT00823797)
Timeframe: Up to progression or death, whichever came first, assessed up to 108 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Bendamustine Hydrochloride) for Glioblastoma1.0
Treatment (Bendamustine Hydrochloride) for Anaplastic Glioma2.6

[back to top]

PFS-6

Defined as the proportion of patients who remain alive and free of any disease progression at 6 months. PFS over time will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with standard errors estimated using Greenwood's formula. (NCT00823797)
Timeframe: At 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Bendamustine Hydrochloride) for Glioblastoma1
Treatment (Bendamustine Hydrochloride) for Anaplastic Glioma8

[back to top]

Toxic Death

Defined as death that is possibly, probably, or definitely attributed to bendamustine hydrochloride. (NCT00823797)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after completion of study treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Bendamustine Hydrochloride) for Glioblastoma0
Treatment (Bendamustine Hydrochloride) for Anaplastic Glioma0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT00834678)
Timeframe: Up to two years

Interventionpatients (Number)
Dose Level 1Dose Level 2
Bendamustine and Erlotinib01

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival at 6 Months and 12 Months (Phase II)

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions (NCT00834678)
Timeframe: Up to two years

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Bendamustine and Erlotinib3.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

(NCT00834678)
Timeframe: from time of study enrollment until death, for up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine and Erlotinib10.8

[back to top]

Maximum-tolerated Dose of Erlotinib Hydrochloride (Phase I)

28 day cycle included intravenous erlotinib on days 15-21. (NCT00834678)
Timeframe: Up to two years

Interventionmg (Number)
Bendamustine and Erlotinib150

[back to top]

Maximum-tolerated Dose of Bendamustine Hydrochloride (Phase I)

28 day cycle included intravenous bendamustine on days 1 and 2. (NCT00834678)
Timeframe: Up to two years

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Bendamustine and Erlotinib120

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DR)

(NCT00834678)
Timeframe: Up to two years

Interventionmonths to progression (Median)
Bendamustine and Erlotinib3.7

[back to top]

Dose-limiting Toxicity (Phase I)

(NCT00834678)
Timeframe: Up to two years

Interventionpatients (Number)
Dose level I, n=5Dose level II, n=6
Bendamustine and Erlotinib01

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events - Phase II

The degree of toxicity as defined by The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 3. (NCT00856830)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Novel Drug Combination8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicity Regimen A - Phase I

The determination of the dose limiting toxicity as defined by The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 3 as follows: grade 4 neutropenia >5 days; grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia; grade 4 thrombocytopenia; or grade >2 non-hematologic toxicities (except for nausea/vomiting, alopecia, or fatigue). (NCT00856830)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase I - Cohort IPhase I - Cohort IIPhase I - Cohort III
Novel Drug Combination011

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 2000), progression is defined as 20% or greater increase from the baseline tumor parameters or new lesions. (NCT00856830)
Timeframe: 7 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Novel Drug Combination6.0

[back to top]

Toxicities of Patients Treated With Bendamustine.

Grade 4 Toxicity (NCT00867503)
Timeframe: Life of the study

InterventionPartcipants (Number)
Bendamustine Grade 4 Toxicity0

[back to top]

Overall Survival in Patients With Platinum and Taxane Refractory Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Cancer With Bendamustine Treatment.

(NCT00867503)
Timeframe: Life of study

InterventionDays (Median)
Median Overall Survival in Days393

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival in Patients With Platinum and Taxane Refractory Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Cancer With Bendamustine Treatment.

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria or Cancer Antigen (CA)125 response using the modified Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup(GCIG) criteria (NCT00867503)
Timeframe: life of the study

InterventionDays (Median)
Bendamustine Median Progression Free Surivial in Months140

[back to top]

Participants With Disease Progression, Relapse or Death At the End of the Treatment Period or the Long-Term Follow-up Period

"Relapsed disease (after CR) and progressive disease (PD) (after PR or SD):~Lymph nodes were considered abnormal if the long axis was greater than 1.5 cm. Lymph nodes with a long axis of 1.1 to 1.5 cm were considered abnormal if its short axis was greater than 1.0 cm.~In patients with no prior history of pulmonary lymphoma, new lung nodules identified by CT require histologic confirmation.~>= 50% increase from nadir in sum of the products of the greatest diameters (SPD) of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (eg, splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered progressive disease, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of less than 1.0 cm must have increased by 2: 50% and to a size of 1.5 cm by 1.5 cm, or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis~other conditions as specified in the protocol" (NCT00877006)
Timeframe: Treatment Period: 18-32 weeks Long-Term Follow-up Period: up to 5 years after the Treatment Period

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)36
R-CHOP/R-CVP30

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. (NCT00877006)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to 5.6 years (Treatment Period + Long-Term Follow-up Period)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)65.0
R-CHOP/R-CVP64.1

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. (NCT00877006)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to 5.6 years (Treatment Period + Long-Term Follow-up Period)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)31.8
R-CHOP/R-CVP33.4

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Event-free Survival (EFS)

"EFS was defined as the time from randomization to treatment failure, disease progression or relapse, other malignancies, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.~Treatment failure was defined as failure to achieve a CR or PR after 6 cycles of treatment. If a patient failed to achieve CR or PR by the time of data analysis or early withdrawal, the treatment failure date was set at 126 days (6 cycles of treatment) after randomization or the new anticancer treatment date, whichever is earlier." (NCT00877006)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to 5.6 years (Treatment Period + Long-Term Follow-up Period)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)31.8
R-CHOP/R-CVP32.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in the Global Health Status Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30-item Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30)

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. EORTC QLQ-C30 includes functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and other (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea, and financial difficulties). This outcome reports the global health status on a scale of 0-100 with a high score for the global health status/QOL represents a high quality of life. (NCT00877006)
Timeframe: Day 1 (prior to treatment), 32 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)3.6
R-CHOP/R-CVP-5.1

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as the time from first response (CR or PR) to disease progression or relapse, or death due to any cause. (NCT00877006)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to 5.6 years (Treatment Period + Long-Term Follow-up Period)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)26.5
R-CHOP/R-CVP32.1

[back to top]

Therapeutic Classification of Prior Medications

(NCT00877006)
Timeframe: prior to start of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
PsycholepticsSex Hormones and Modulators of the Genital SystemStomatological PreparationsThroat PreparationsThyroid TherapyTopical Products for Join and Muscular PainUnspecified HerbalUrologicalsVaccinesVasoprotectivesVitamins
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)57110016110202070
R-CHOP/R-CVP59120017010117061

[back to top]

Worst Overall CTCAE Grade for Hematology Laboratory Test Results

Hematology test data were graded according to National Cancer Institute's (NCI) CTCAE version 3, and graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (life-threatening), 5 (death). The table presents the worst CTCAE grades for hematology test results experienced by participants overall (i.e., the worst post-baseline grade value for each participant and hematology test across all cycles). (NCT00877006)
Timeframe: 32 weeks (conducted at screening, Day 1 of each cycle, weekly during treatment, and at the end-of-treatment visit)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 1Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 2Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 3Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 4Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grades 1-4Hemoglobin: Grade 1Hemoglobin: Grade 2Hemoglobin: Grade 3Hemoglobin: Grade 4Hemoglobin: Grades 1-4Lymphocytes Absolute: Grade 1Lymphocytes Absolute: Grade 2Lymphocytes Absolute: Grade 3Lymphocytes Absolute: Grade 4Lymphocytes Absolute: Grades 1-4Platelets: Grade 1Platelets: Grade 2Platelets: Grade 3Platelets: Grade 4Platelets: Grades 1-4White Blood Cells: Grade 1White Blood Cells: Grade 2White Blood Cells: Grade 3White Blood Cells: Grade 4White Blood Cells: Grades 1-4
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)225148501711294251177155483143106149713641796519204
R-CHOP/R-CVP142047104185129517218965555912572147810122498927187

[back to top]

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at the End of Treatment Period

Participants' ECOG Performance Status was evaluated at the end of treatment as improved, stayed the same, or worsened from baseline (see Baseline Characteristics for ECOG Performance Status). (NCT00877006)
Timeframe: Week 32

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ImprovedStayed the SameWorsened
Bendamustine/Rituximab3215334
R-CHOP/R-CVP2814142

[back to top]

Worst Overall Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grades for Serum Chemistry Laboratory Test Results

Clinical laboratory data were graded according to National Cancer Institute's (NCI) CTCAE version 3, and graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (life-threatening), 5 (death). The table presents the worst CTCAE grades for serum chemistry test results experienced by participants overall (i.e., the worst post-baseline grade value for each participant and laboratory test across all cycles). (NCT00877006)
Timeframe: 32 weeks (conducted at screening, Day 1 of each cycle, and end-of-treatment visit)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Albumin: Grade 1Albumin: Grade 2Albumin: Grade 3Albumin: Grade 4Albumin: Grades 1-4Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 2Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 3Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 4Alkaline Phosphatase: Grades 1-4Creatinine: Grade 1Creatinine: Grade 2Creatinine: Grade 3Creatinine: Grade 4Creatinine: Grades 1-4Gamma-glutamyl transferase: Grade 1Gamma-glutamyl transferase: Grade 2Gamma-glutamyl transferase: Grade 3Gamma-glutamyl transferase: Grade 4Gamma-glutamyl transferase: Grades 1-4Hypercalcemia: Grade 1Hypercalcemia: Grade 2Hypercalcemia: Grade 3Hypercalcemia: Grade 4Hypercalcemia: Grades 1-4Hyperglycemia: Grade 1Hyperglycemia: Grade 2Hyperglycemia: Grade 3Hyperglycemia: Grade 4Hyperglycemia: Grades 1-4Hyperkalemia: Grade 1Hyperkalemia: Grade 2Hyperkalemia: Grade 3Hyperkalemia: Grade 4Hyperkalemia: Grades 1-4Hypernatremia: Grade 1Hypernatremia: Grade 2Hypernatremia: Grade 3Hypernatremia: Grade 4Hypernatremia: Grades 1-4Hypocalcemia: Grade 1Hypocalcemia: Grade 2Hypocalcemia: Grade 3Hypocalcemia: Grade 4Hypocalcemia: Grades 1-4Hypoglycemia: Grade 1Hypoglycemia: Grade 2Hypoglycemia: Grade 3Hypoglycemia: Grade 4Hypoglycemia: Grades 1-4Hypokalemia: Grade 1Hypokalemia: Grade 2Hypokalemia: Grade 3Hypokalemia: Grade 4Hypokalemia: Grades 1-4Hyponatremia: Grade 1Hyponatremia: Grade 2Hyponatremia: Grade 3Hyponatremia: Grade 4Hyponatremia: Grades 1-4Magnesium: Grade 1Magnesium: Grade 2Magnesium: Grade 3Magnesium: Grade 4Magnesium: Grades 1-4Phosphorus: Grade 1Phosphorus: Grade 2Phosphorus: Grade 3Phosphorus: Grade 4Phosphorus: Grades 1-4Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 1Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 2Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 3Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 4Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grades 1-4Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 1Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 2Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 3Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 4Alanine Aminotransferase: Grades 1-4Total Bilirubin: Grade 1Total Bilirubin: Grade 2Total Bilirubin: Grade 3Total Bilirubin: Grade 4Total Bilirubin: Grades 1-4Uric Acid: Grade 1Uric Acid: Grade 2Uric Acid: Grade 3Uric Acid: Grade 4Uric Acid: Grades 1-4
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)331430504110042193102331183052601079420150129731011800083681348151001618000184000040460004672530354221045466205414100154100142
R-CHOP/R-CVP44130057253002825100263710605360006743415112481009100001028600341000010160101728050334411046522313132210353831042700074200042

[back to top]

Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications

(NCT00877006)
Timeframe: 32 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
PsycholepticsSex Hormones and Modulators of the Genital SystemStomatological PreparationsThroat PreparationsThyroid TherapyTopical Preparations for Join and Muscular PainUnspecified HerbalUrologicalsVaccinesVasoprotectivesVitamins
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)696233313511116
R-CHOP/R-CVP744292125411821

[back to top]

Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Weight

Participants were weighed at Baseline and at Endpoint (Week 32); those participants with an increase or decrease of >=10% were considered potentially clinically significant. (NCT00877006)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 32

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Increase >=10%Decrease >=10%
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)818
R-CHOP/R-CVP58

[back to top]

Participants Who Died At the End of the Treatment Period or the Long-Term Follow-up Period

Death is due to any cause. Data are broken out by patients who died within 30 days of the last dose of study medications, and those who died greater than 30 days of the last dose of study medications. (NCT00877006)
Timeframe: Treatment Period: 18-32 weeks Long-Term Follow-up Period: up to 5 years after the Treatment Period

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All DeathsDeaths within 30 days of study treatmentDeaths greater than 30 days of study treatment
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)40238
R-CHOP/R-CVP32131

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs at End of Treatment Period

AE=any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity after dispensation of the study drug and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. An AE can, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended physical sign, symptom, or laboratory parameter that develops or worsens in severity during the course of the study, or significant worsening of the disease under study (or any concurrent disease), whether or not considered related to the study drug. AEs were graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (life-threatening), 5 (death). SAE=an adverse event occurring at any dose that results in: death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant disability/incapacity (a substantial disruption of one's ability to conduct normal life functions), a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other important medical event. (NCT00877006)
Timeframe: 32 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any AESevere AEs (grades 3, 4, 5)Treatment-related AEsDeathsSAEsWithdrawn due to AEs
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)221130209126010
R-CHOP/R-CVP213127NA9493

[back to top]

Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs

(NCT00877006)
Timeframe: 32 weeks (conducted at screening, Day 1 of each cycle, and end-of-treatment visit)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Heart Rate >=120 and ↑ >=15 bpmHeart Rate <=50 and ↓ >=15 bpmSystolic Blood Pressure(BP) >=180 and ↑ >=20 mm HgSystolic BP <=90 and ↓ >=20 mm HgDiastolic BP >=105 and ↑ from Baseline >=15 mm HgDiastolic BP <=50 and ↓ from Baseline >=15 mm Hg
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)022612
R-CHOP/R-CVP122222

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at End of Treatment Period

Overall Response=participants with Complete Remission (CR) + those with Partial Remission (PR). CR=see Outcome Measure 1 for details. PR= at least a 50% decrease in the sum of the product of the greatest diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes/masses; at least a 50% decrease in the SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules in their greatest transverse diameter; no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, and other nodes; no measurable disease in organs other than the liver or spleen; no new sites of disease; protocol-specified PET scan and bone marrow criteria. (NCT00877006)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 21 or 28-day cycles (18-32 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)97
R-CHOP/R-CVP91

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at End of Treatment Period

CR=complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms, if present pretherapy; protocol-specified positron emission tomography (PET) scan assessment criteria; (if the spleen and/or liver were enlarged on the basis of physical examination and/or anatomic imaging before treatment) the liver and/or spleen were considered normal size on physical examination and by anatomic imaging after therapy, with disappearance of all nodules related to lymphoma; (if the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma before treatment) the infiltrate must have cleared on subsequent bone marrow biopsies. (NCT00877006)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 21 or 28-day cycles (18-32 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR)31
R-CHOP/R-CVP25

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as the time between the date of the first response to date of progression or death. Response is determined on the basis of the 2007 IWG criteria. A complete response is a complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. A partial response is at least a 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses, no increase should be observed in the size of other nodes, liver or spleen, and no new sites of disease should be observed. (NCT00891839)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Month 43

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine+Rituximab18.9

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from first exposure to study medication to death, or to last date from adverse events, concomitant medications, vital signs, lost to follow-up, or last known alive, for overall survival censoring date. (NCT00891839)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Month 57

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine+Rituximab38.4

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Progression-Free Survival

Progression-free survival is defined as the time from first exposure to study medication to disease progression or relapse, or death due to any cause. Progression is defined using the 2007 International Working Group criteria, as any new lesion or increase by at least 50% of previously involved sites from nadir. (NCT00891839)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Month 45

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine+Rituximab17.2

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (Complete Response + Partial Response) at the End of Cycles 3 and 6 Using the 2007 International Working Group Criteria

"The International Working Group (IWG) criteria (Cheson et al 2007) for a complete response is a complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. A partial response is at least a 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses, no increase should be observed in the size of other nodes, liver or spleen, and no new sites of disease should be observed.~95% CIs are calculated using binomial exact method." (NCT00891839)
Timeframe: Month 3 (end of cycle 3), Month 6 (end of cycle 6)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
end of Cycle 3end of Cycle 6
Bendamustine+Rituximab7182

[back to top]

Shifts in Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

"The ECOG scale is:~Grade 0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction;~Grade 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light nature;~Grade 2: Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to work. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours;~Grade 3: Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair > 50% of waking hours;~Grade 4: Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Confined to bed or Chair.~The shift table compares baseline ECOG scores to the ECOG scores as of the last treatment visit." (NCT00891839)
Timeframe: Day 0 (baseline) up to Month 8

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ImprovedStayed the sameDeteriorated
Bendamustine+Rituximab8324

[back to top]

Shifts in Baseline to Post-Treatment in Positron Emission Tomography (PET)

Participants had a whole-body PET at baseline and at the end of cycle 6 or the end-of-treatment visit. Negative PET refers to PET results showing no abnormal lymph nodes; conversely, positive PET refers to PET results showing abnormal lymph nodes. (NCT00891839)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -30 to 0), post treatment (up to Month 9, 30 days following completion of therapy)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline Negative - Study NegativeBaseline Positive - Study NegativeBaseline Negative - Study PositiveBaseline Positive - Study Positive
Bendamustine+Rituximab002315

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With GVHD (Graft Versus Host Disease)

Acute grade 2 to 4 Graft versus host disease( GVHD )for patients who were able to be analyzed by measuring the T cell counts for increased CD3+ before and after lenalidomide. (NCT00899431)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months after allotransplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 10
Group 23
Group 31

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate of the Combination of BMR (Bendamustine + Mitoxantrone + Rituximab)

To evaluate the complete response rate of the combination of BMR in previously untreated follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. CR defined by International Working Group Criteria for Response for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms. (NCT00901927)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bendamustine + Mitoxantrone + Rituximab3

[back to top]

Participants With Adverse Events

To evaluate the toxicity and safety of BMR in participants with untreated follicular lymphoma. (NCT00901927)
Timeframe: 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine + Mitoxantrone + Rituximab3

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP) for Participants Treated With BMR (Bendamustine, Mitoxantrone, and Rituximab)

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT00901927)
Timeframe: 5 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine + Mitoxantrone + Rituximab5

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (Phase 1)

The Maximum Tolerated Dose was not met in Phase 1 of the study. Phase 2 participants were enrolled at the highest dose administered in Phase 1 (Dose Level 6) and this Outcome Measure is the reported number of dose-limiting toxicities experienced by Phase 1 participants. DLTs were defined as any grade 3 non-hematologic adverse even that did not resolve within 72 hours, any occurrence of a grade 4 non-hematologic adverse event, or failure to engraft with an absolute neutrophil count of 500/mm^3 and platelet count of 20,000/mm^3 untransfused by Day 35 post-transplant. (NCT00916058)
Timeframe: 35 days post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Level 10
Dose Level 21
Dose Level 30
Dose Level 40
Dose Level 50
Dose Level 60

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (Phase 2)

"Time elapsed between Day 0 and disease progression, as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) disease response criteria. Disease progression is defined as an increase of >25% from lowest response value in any one or more of the following:~Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be > 0.5 g/dL)~Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be > 200 mg/24 h)~Only in patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels; the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain levels. The absolute increase must be > 10 mg/dL~Bone marrow plasma cell percentage; the absolute percentage must be > 10%~Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas~Development of hypercalcaemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dL or 2.65 mmol/L) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder" (NCT00916058)
Timeframe: From Day 0 to first incidence of disease progression, up to 86 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 247

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (Phase 1)

"Time elapsed between Day 0 and disease progression, as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) disease response criteria. Disease progression is defined as an increase of >25% from lowest response value in any one or more of the following:~Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be > 0.5 g/dL)~Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be > 200 mg/24 h)~Only in patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels; the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain levels. The absolute increase must be > 10 mg/dL~Bone marrow plasma cell percentage; the absolute percentage must be > 10%~Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas~Development of hypercalcaemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dL or 2.65 mmol/L) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder" (NCT00916058)
Timeframe: From Day 0 to first incidence of disease progression, up to 1,128 days

InterventionDays (Median)
Phase 1791

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (Phase 2) - Number of Participants Achieving at Least a Partial Response or Better in Disease Status at Day 100 Post-transplant

Number of patients achieving at least a partial response or better in disease status at Day 100 post-transplant, as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) disease response criteria. Partial response in disease status is defined by the IMWG as ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-h urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg per 24 hours; If the serum and urine M-protein are unmeasurable, a ≥50% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria; If serum and urine M-protein are unmeasurable, and serum-free light assay is also unmeasurable, ≥50% reduction in plasma cells is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow plasma-cell percentage was ≥30%. In addition to these criteria, if present at baseline, a ≥50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required (NCT00916058)
Timeframe: 100 days post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 233

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 2 Years (Phase 1)

Time elapsed between Day 0 and death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 2 years. (NCT00916058)
Timeframe: From Day 0 until time of death, assessed up to 2 years.

InterventionPercentage of participants alive (Median)
Phase 170

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 3 Years (Phase 2)

Time elapsed between Day 0 and death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 years. (NCT00916058)
Timeframe: From Day 0 until time of death, assessed up to 3 years.

InterventionPercentage of participants alive (Median)
Phase 288

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Time to Progression (TTP)

"Time to progression was defined as the time from initiation of therapy to progressive disease (PD). PD requires at least one of the following:~>25% increase in serum monoclonal paraprotein (which must also be an absolute increase of at least 5 g/L),~>25% increase in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion (which must also be an absolute increase of at least 200 mg/24 h),~>25% increase in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate or on trephine biopsy (which must also be an absolute increase of at least 10%),~definite increase in the size of existing lytic bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas,~the development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas,~the development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dL or 2.8 mmol/L not attributable to any other cause)." (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: up to 8.6 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine and Bortezomib - Overall8.4

[back to top]

Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

"Maximum tolerated dose was the dose that was 1 step lower than the dose where at least one third of patients experienced DLT. A DLT was defined as any of the following occurring during the first cycle:~grade 4 hematologic toxicity without regard for relationship to study drug treatment~thrombocytopenia grade 3 with grade 3 or grade 4 hemorrhage~grade 3 febrile neutropenia~grade 3 or grade 4 nausea and vomiting refractory to anti emetic therapy~any study drug related grade 3 or grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity~any drug related death~Toxicity grades (3=severe AE and 4=life-threatening or disabling AE) were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3." (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: Day 1 - 28

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bendamustine 50 mg/m^2 Cohort0
Bendamustine 70 mg/m^2 Cohort0
Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 Cohort0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With An Overall Tumor Response As Assessed By the Investigator

Overall tumor response is the sum of a complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR) and minimal response (MR). A modified version of the Bladé criteria for response was used. Abbreviated definitions for the response categories can be found in the description of outcome #3. (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: Up to 7.5 months (eight 28-day cycles)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine 50 mg/m^2 Cohort40.0
Bendamustine 70 mg/m^2 Cohort25.0
Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 Cohort51.6

[back to top]

Time to the First Response

Time to first response is defined as the time from the initiation of therapy to the first evidence of a confirmed response (ie, CR, VGPR, PR, or MR). (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: up to 8.5 months

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Bendamustine and Bortezomib - Overall1.9

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response

Duration of response (DR) is defined as the time from the first response to progressive disease (PD). See outcome #4 for a PD definition. (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: up to 8.5 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine and Bortezomib - OverallNA

[back to top]

Participants' Best Tumor Response as Assessed by the Investigator

Abbreviated criteria for response categories: CR includes the disappearance of the original monoclonal protein (M-protein) from blood and urine, and <5% plasma cells in the bone marrow, and no increase in size/number of lytic bone lesions, and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas for >=4 weeks. VGPR includes serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not electrophoresis, and reduction in 24-hr urinary light chain excretion by <100 mg, and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas for >= 4 weeks, and no increase in size/number of lytic bone lesions. PR includes a >=50% reduction in serum M-protein, and reduction in 24-hr urinary light chain excretion by either >=90% or to <200 mg, and >=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas, and no increase in size/number of lytic bone lesions. MR includes a >=25% and <=49% reduction in serum M-protein. SD does not meet criteria for the other response categories. See outcome #4 for a definition of PD. (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: up to 7.5 months (eight 28-day cycles)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete response (CR)Very good partial response (VGPR)Partial response (PR)Minimal response (MR)Stable disease (SD)Progressive disease (PD)
Bendamustine 50 mg/m^2 Cohort001121
Bendamustine 70 mg/m^2 Cohort000121
Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 Cohort1285132

[back to top]

Summary of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Counts of participants who had AEs are summarized in a variety of categories. Severity and relatedness to study drug are in the opinion of the investigator according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0. Severity is rated on a 5-point scale: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=life threatening or disabling, and 5= death related to AE. Relatedness is assessed on a 5-point scale: not related, unlikely, possible, probable and definite. Definite, probable and possible answers are reported as 'related' to study medication. Deaths are reported up to 18 months. All the deaths occurred beyond the treatment-emergent timeframe since they occurred 6.5-16 months after the final dosing. All other parts of the summary represent the treatment-emergent timeframe (up to 8.5 months) which is the treatment period plus 30 days. (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: up to 8.5 months. Deaths are reported up to 18 months

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventAny non-haematologic adverse eventSevere adverse event (grade 3 or 4)Treatment-related adverse eventsDeathsSerious adverse eventsWithdrawn from study due to AE
Bendamustine 50 mg/m^2 Cohort5534102
Bendamustine 70 mg/m^2 Cohort4434012
Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 Cohort31312231575

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the time from initiation of therapy to death from any cause or last follow-up visit. (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: up to 23 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine and Bortezomib - Overall17.82

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Progression-Free Survival

Progression free survival is the time between the date of initiation of therapy to progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. See outcome #4 for a definition of PD. (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: up to 23 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine and Bortezomib - Overall15.21

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the number of days from the day of first study drug administration to the day the patient experienced disease progression or death from any cause. Response and progression in cases of small lymphocytic lymphoma(SLL) were evaluated using the International Working Group Criteria for response in NHL (Cheson, et al 1996). Response and progression in cases of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were evaluated using the NCI-sponsored CLL Working Group guidelines for CLL (Cheson, et al 2007). (NCT00974233)
Timeframe: 42 months (6 months induction therapy, 12 months maintenance, 24 months long-term follow-up)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Induction/Maintenance Chemotherapy18.3

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the day of first study drug administration until progression of CLL/SLL or death from any cause. PFS is reported as the proportion of participants with PFS up to 42 months. (NCT00974233)
Timeframe: 42 months (6 months induction therapy, 12 months maintenance, 24 months long-term follow-up)

InterventionProportion of participants (Median)
1-year progression-free survival2-year progression-free survival3-year progression-free survival
Induction/Maintenance Chemotherapy0.620.350.23

[back to top]

Toxicities Observed With Induction Chemotherapy and Maintenance Therapy

Toxicities were reported using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. (NCT00974233)
Timeframe: 42 months (6 months induction therapy, 12 months maintenance, 24 months long-term follow-up)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 3 leukopeniaGrade 4 leukopeniaGrade 3 neutropeniaGrade 4 neutropeniaGrade 3 anemiaGrade 3 thrombocytopeniaGrade 4 thrombocytopeniaGrade 3 febrile neutropeniaGrade 3 infectionGrade 4 infectionGrade 5 infectionGrade 3 fatigueGrade 4 fatigueGrade 3 nausea/emesisGrade 3 serum transaminase levels (Gr 3/Gr 4)
Induction Chemoimmunotherapy55614152410112034
Maintenance617201014100100

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (Complete + Partial Responses)

Response and progression in cases of SLL were evaluated using the International Working Group Criteria for response in NHL (Cheson, et al 1996). Response and progression in cases of CLL were evaluated using the NCI-sponsored CLL Working Group guidelines for CLL (Cheson, et al 2007). Complete response defined as resolution enlarged lymph nodes, spleen and liver; normalization of blood counts (neutrophils, hemoglobin, platelets); no residual CLL/SLL detectable in the bone marrow. Partial response defined as 50% or more reduction in size of enlarged lymph nodes, liver or spleen; 50% or more improvement of blood counts; 50% or more improvement in the blood lymphocyte count. Progressive disease defined as 50% or more increase in the combined measurements of at least 2 lymph nodes as measured on CT scans or the appearance of new enlarged lymph nodes; 50% of more increase in the size of the spleen or liver; 50% or more increase in blood lymphocyte count. (NCT00974233)
Timeframe: 42 months (6 months induction therapy, 12 months maintenance, 24 months long-term follow-up)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)7
Partial Response (PR)12
Stable Disease9
Overall Response Rate19

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from the day of first study drug administration until death from any cause. (NCT00974233)
Timeframe: 42 months (6 months induction therapy, 12 months maintenance, 24 months long-term follow-up)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Overall Study Population42.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Estimated probable duration of life from on-study date to date of death from any cause, using the Kaplan-Meier method with censoring (see analysis population description for additional details) (NCT00984542)
Timeframe: On study to date of death from any cause or last date known alive, measured every 6-8 weeks from the end of treatment, up to 31 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Bendatmustine144

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Each Worst-grade Toxicity

Number of patients with worst-grade toxicity at each of five grades following NCI Common Toxicity Criteria with grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe, grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling, 5 = death. (NCT00984542)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 6 cycles and at 30 days after end of treatment, at 156 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of patients with worst-grade toxicity of 1Number of patients with worst-grade toxicity of 2Number of patients with worst-grade toxicity of 3Number of patients with worst-grade toxicity of 4Number of patients with worst-grade toxicity of 5
Bendamustine1142159

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Estimated probable duration from on-study date to date of disease progression, using the Kaplan-Meier method with censoring (see analysis population description for additional details). Disease progression is defined under RECIST v1.1 as >=20% increase in sum of longest diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or appearance of new lesions. (NCT00984542)
Timeframe: On-study to date of progression, measured following cycle 2, 4, and 6 of a 21-day cycle for 6 cycles, (during 126 days)

Interventiondays (Median)
Bendamustine123

[back to top]

Best Response

"Number of patients in each response category, per RECIST v1.1, summarized as follows for target lesion criteria (see RECIST v1.1 for additional details):~complete response (CR),disappearance of target lesions; partial response (PR), >=30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; progressive disease (PD), >=20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions or appearance of new lesions; stable disease (SD), insufficient change in target lesions or new lesions to qualify as either PD or SD. Patients are categorized according to the best response achieved prior to occurrence of progressive disease, where best response hierarchy is CR>PR>SD>PD." (NCT00984542)
Timeframe: On-treatment date to date of disease progression, following cycle 2, 4, and 6 of a 21-day cycle for 6 cycles, (assessed up to 126 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseProgressive DiseaseStable Disease
Bendamustine1101417

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Estimated probable duration of life without disease progression, from on-study date to earlier of progression date or date of death from any cause, using the Kaplan-Meier method with censoring (see analysis population description for additional details). Disease progression is defined under RECIST v1.1 as >=20% increase in sum of longest diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or appearance of new lesions. (NCT00984542)
Timeframe: On-study date to lesser of date of progression or date of death from any cause ,measured following cycle 2, 4, 6 of a 21-day cycle for 6 cycles, (assessed up to 126 days)

Interventiondays (Median)
Bendamustine98

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

NCI IWG response criteria (NCT01010568)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ofatumumab and Bendamustine2

[back to top]

Median PFS

Kaplan Meyer PFS (NCT01010568)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ofatumumab and Bendamustine8.1

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

40% per the National Cancer Institute Working Group Response Criteria for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (NCT01010568)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ofatumumab and Bendamustine4

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

Percentage of patients experiencing a complete response (CR) per RECIST. CR = disappearance of all target lesions. (NCT01029730)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of evaluable participants (Number)
Bendamustine/Bortezomib/Rituximab65

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival

The Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Worsening of Their Disease. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01029730)
Timeframe: at 3 and 6 months, then every 3 months post-treatment for 1 year and every 6 months thereafter until disease progression; projected 2 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine/Bortezomib/RituximabNA

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

The Percentage of Patients Who Experience an Objective Benefit From Treatment. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01029730)
Timeframe: At 3 and 6 months during treatment, then 6 months post-treatment.

Interventionpercentage of evaluable participants (Number)
Bendamustine/Bortezomib/Rituximab94

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety.

Toxicity grades will be assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.0. Includes adverse events occurring in >1 patient (NCT01029730)
Timeframe: Days 1,8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle for 6 months, then every 3 months for a year, projected 2 years.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
LeukopeniaNeutropeniaLymphopeniaThrombocytopeniaAnemiaPeripheral NeuropathyDiarrheaFatigueNausea/VomitingCoughRashSyncopeHypocalcemia/Hyponatremia
Bendamustine/Bortezomib/Rituximab161694354432222

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (Phase II)

The progression-free survival time is defined as the time from registration to disease progression (PD=Increase of > 25% from lowest response value in Serum/Urine M-component) while receiving bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. The distribution of progression-free survival will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Treatment response was assessed using the International Myeloma Working Group uniform criteria. (NCT01049945)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years from study completion

Interventionmonths (Median)
Maximum Tolerated Dose, Dose Level 411.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Phase II)

The overall survival time is defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause. The distribution of overall survival will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. The overall survival rate at 6 months is defined as the percentage of participants who are alive at 6 months. (NCT01049945)
Timeframe: at 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Maximum Tolerated Dose, Dose Level 487

[back to top]

Event Free Survival (Phase II)

The event-free survival time is defined as the time from registration to disease progression (PD=Increase of > 25% from lowest response value in Serum/Urine M-component) while receiving bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, death due to any cause, or subsequent treatment for multiple myeloma. The distribution of event-free survival will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Treatment response was assessed using the International Myeloma Working Group uniform criteria. (NCT01049945)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years from study completion

Interventionmonths (Median)
Maximum Tolerated Dose, Dose Level 45.6

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) (Phase II)

DOR is the time from the date the patient's objective status is first noted to be PR or better to the earliest date of progression (PD=Increase of > 25% from lowest response value in Serum/Urine M-component) is documented. Treatment response was assessed using the International Myeloma Working Group uniform criteria. Complete response (CR)=Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. Stringent complete response (sCR)=A CR plus normal FLC ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow. Near complete response (nCR)=A CR, with the persistence of original monoclonal protein. Very good partial response (VGPR) =Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg per 24 h, Partial response (PR)=≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-h urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg per 24 h. (NCT01049945)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years from study completion

Interventionmonths (Median)
Maximum Tolerated Dose, Dose Level 424.4

[back to top]

Dose Limiting Toxicity of Bendamustine Hydrochloride and Lenalidomide in Combination With Dexamethasone (Phase I)

"The Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) is the dose level below that at which a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is observed in ≥ 33% (i.e., ≥ 2 of 6) subjects in a cohort. A dose limiting toxicity is defined as one of the following adverse events in the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 3.0 deemed at least possibly related to treatment:~Grade 2 neuropathy with pain~Any grade 3 Non-Hematologic toxicity~Any grade Non-Hematologic event requiring a dose reduction in cycle 1 or delaying the next cycle by >14 days.~Grade 4 neutropenia~Febrile neutropenia~Grade 4 thrombocytopenia~Grade 3 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding~Any Hematologic event requiring a dose reduction in cycle 1 or a delay in the next cycle of treatment by >14 days.~We are reporting the results of this endpoint as the number of DLTs per dose level." (NCT01049945)
Timeframe: One cycle of treatment

InterventionDose Limiting Toxic Events (Number)
Phase I, Dose Level 10
Phase I, Dose Level 21
Phase I, Dose Level 30
Phase I, Dose Level 40
Phase I, Dose Level 52

[back to top]

Confirmed Response Rate (Dose Level 4) Reported as the Percentage of Patients Achieving a Confirmed Response (sCR, CR, VGPR, or PR).

"Complete response (CR)~- Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow.~Stringent complete response (sCR) - A CR plus normal FLC ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow~Near complete response (nCR) A CR, with the persistence of original monoclonal protein~Very good partial response (VGPR)~- Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg per 24 h~Partial response (PR)~≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-h urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg per 24 h.~a ≥50% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels~or a ≥50% reduction in plasma cells is required in place of M-protein, if ≥30% at baseline." (NCT01049945)
Timeframe: Up to 6 cycles of treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Maximum Tolerated Dose, Dose Level 444

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

Defined as the percent of patients having a complete response (CR) to treatment, assessed using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria. CR=disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and 5% or less plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT01056276)
Timeframe: every 8 weeks for approximately 48 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Original BBD Regimen0
Modified BBD Regimen13

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Defined as the interval of time (in months) that patient are alive from date of first protocol treatment to date of documented tumor progression or date of death from any cause. Progressive disease, assessed according to International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria, is defined as at least a 25% increase from the nadir in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein, urine M-protein, or bone marrow plasma cell percentage of 10% or greater. (NCT01056276)
Timeframe: every 8 weeks for up to 48 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Original BBD Regimen11.1
Modified BBD Regimen18.9

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

The number of patients with observed complete or partial response (CR or PR) assessed by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria. PR=50% or greater reduction from baseline in serum M-protein and 90% or greater reduction from baseline in 24-hour urinary M-protein. (NCT01056276)
Timeframe: every 4 weeks for approximately 2 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRPR
Modified BBD Regimen58
Originl BBD Regimen05

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Experienced Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events

All serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were assessed using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0, and were collected from start of study treatment until 30 days after last dose of study medication. Refer to the Adverse Event module for specific terms. (NCT01056276)
Timeframe: approximately 36 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SAEsAEs
Modified BBD Regimen1738
Original BBD Regimen718

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Defined as the interval of time, in months, from first study treatment until the earlier of the date of death or date last known alive. (NCT01056276)
Timeframe: every 4 weeks until progressive disease then every 12 weeks, projected 48 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Original BBD RegimenNA
BBD TreatmentNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants by Disease Response Category in the First-Line Subpopulation

The criteria for CR, CRi, PR, and nPR are identified in previous outcome measure(s). PD was defined by at least one of the following: the presence of lymphadenopathy; an increase in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen by >/= 50% or the de novo appearance of hepatomegaly or splenomegaly; an increase in the number of blood lymphocytes by >/= 50% with >/= 5000 B-cells per microliter (B-cells/mcL); transformation to a more aggressive histology; or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to CLL. Participants not achieving a CR or PR, and who did not exhibit PD, were considered to have stable disease (SD). The percentage of participants achieving each level of response was calculated as the number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number of participants analyzed. The rows below are labeled first by the level of response at the end of 6 cycles (C6), then by level of response at the confirmation assessment. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: After 6 treatment cycles and at the confirmation of response assessment at least 12 weeks later (up to 36 weeks)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CR with biopsy (C6), CR (confirmed)CR with biopsy (C6), CRi (confirmed)CR with biopsy (C6), nPR (confirmed)CR with biopsy (C6), PR (confirmed)CR with biopsy (C6), SD (confirmed)CR with biopsy (C6), PD (confirmed)CR with biopsy (C6), Missing (confirmed)CR without biopsy (C6), CR (confirmed)CR without biopsy (C6), CRi (confirmed)CR without biopsy (C6), nPR (confirmed)CR without biopsy (C6), PR (confirmed)CR without biopsy (C6), SD (confirmed)CR without biopsy (C6), PD (confirmed)CR without biopsy (C6), Missing (confirmed)PR (C6), CR (confirmed)PR (C6), CRi (confirmed)PR (C6), nPR (confirmed)PR (C6), PR (confirmed)PR (C6), SD (confirmed)PR (C6), PD (confirmed)PR (C6), Missing (confirmed)SD (C6), CR (confirmed)SD (C6), CRi (confirmed)SD (C6), nPR (confirmed)SD (C6), PR (confirmed)SD (C6), SD (confirmed)SD (C6), PD (confirmed)SD (C6), Missing (confirmed)Missing (C6), CR (confirmed)Missing (C6), CRi (confirmed)Missing (C6), nPR (confirmed)Missing (C6), PR (confirmed)Missing (C6), SD (confirmed)Missing (C6), PD (confirmed)Missing (C6), Missing (confirmed)
Rituximab + Bendamustine21.52.51.719.00002.50016.5000.81.7008.300.8000000000.80000024.0
Rituximab + Chlorambucil9.206.717.51.7005.80010.00004.20021.702.5000000.80.8000000019.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Molecular Response in the First-Line Subpopulation

Molecular response was defined as negative minimal residual disease (MRD) during study treatment or within 4 months after the end of treatment. Negative MRD was defined as a proportion of malignant B-cells in normal B-cells < 0.0001. The percentage of participants achieving molecular response was calculated as the number of participants with negative MRD divided by the number of participants analyzed. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: Up to 4 months after the last treatment cycle (up to 40 weeks)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Molecular responseNo molecular response
Rituximab + Bendamustine57.142.9
Rituximab + Chlorambucil16.084.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Confirmed CR According to IWCLL 2008 Guidelines in the Second-Line Subpopulation After 6 Cycles of Therapy

The definition of confirmed CR required all of the following criteria as assessed at least 2 months after completion of therapy: peripheral blood lymphocytes < 4 times 10^9 cells/L; absence of significant lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, or splenomegaly due to CLL involvement; absence of constitutional symptoms; normal CBC without need for transfusion or exogenous growth factors, as exhibited by neutrophils >/= 1.5 times 10^9 cells/L, platelets > 100 times 10^9 cells/L, and hemoglobin > 11.0 g/dL; normocellular BM aspirate with < 30% lymphocytes; absence of lymphoid nodules; and BM biopsy without CLL activity. The percentage of participants achieving confirmed CR was calculated as the number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: At least 2 months after completion of therapy (up to 32 weeks)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Confirmed CR with biopsyCR without biopsyNo confirmed CR
Rituximab + Bendamustine15.83.580.7
Rituximab + Chlorambucil1.71.796.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Confirmed CR According to IWCLL 2008 Guidelines in the Pooled Population After 6 Cycles of Therapy

The definition of confirmed CR required all of the following criteria as assessed at least 2 months after completion of therapy: peripheral blood lymphocytes < 4 times 10^9 cells/L; absence of significant lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, or splenomegaly due to CLL involvement; absence of constitutional symptoms; normal CBC without need for transfusion or exogenous growth factors, as exhibited by neutrophils >/= 1.5 times 10^9 cells/L, platelets > 100 times 10^9 cells/L, and hemoglobin > 11.0 g/dL; normocellular BM aspirate with < 30% lymphocytes; absence of lymphoid nodules; and BM biopsy without CLL activity. The percentage of participants achieving confirmed CR was calculated as the number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: At least 2 months after completion of therapy (up to 32 weeks)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Confirmed CR with biopsyCR without biopsyNo confirmed CR
Rituximab + Bendamustine21.32.875.8
Rituximab + Chlorambucil6.74.588.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Confirmed Complete Response (CR) According to International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2008 Guidelines in the First-Line Subpopulation After 6 Cycles of Therapy

The definition of confirmed CR required all of the following criteria as assessed at least 2 months after completion of therapy: peripheral blood lymphocytes less than (<) 4 times 10^9 cells per liter (cells/L); absence of significant lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, or splenomegaly due to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) involvement; absence of constitutional symptoms; normal complete blood count (CBC) without need for transfusion or exogenous growth factors, as exhibited by neutrophils at least (>/=) 1.5 times 10^9 cells/L, platelets greater than (>) 100 times 10^9 cells/L, and hemoglobin > 11.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL); normocellular bone marrow (BM) aspirate with < 30 percent (%) lymphocytes; absence of lymphoid nodules; and BM biopsy without CLL activity. The percentage of participants achieving confirmed CR was calculated as the number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: At least 2 months after completion of therapy (up to 32 weeks)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Confirmed CR with biopsyCR without biopsyNo confirmed CR
Rituximab + Bendamustine242.573.6
Rituximab + Chlorambucil9.25.885

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Best Overall Response of CR, CR With Incomplete Marrow Recovery (CRi), Partial Response (PR), or Nodular PR (nPR) in the First-Line Subpopulation

The criteria for CR are identified in previous outcome measure(s). Those fulfilling CR criteria but who have persistent anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia were considered CRi. The definition of PR required that the following be documented for minimum 2 months: >/= 50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocytes from Baseline; reduction in lymphadenopathy; >/= 50% reduction in spleen or liver enlargement; and CBC with one of the following without need for transfusion or exogenous growth factors: polymorphonuclear leukocytes >/= 1.5 times 10^9 cells/L, platelets > 100 times 10^9 cells/L or >/= 50% improvement from Baseline, or hemoglobin > 11.0 g/dL or >/= 50% improvement from Baseline. Participants with lymphoid nodules who otherwise met CR criteria were considered nPR. The percentage of participants achieving each level of response was calculated as the number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: After 3 and 6 treatment cycles and from Baseline to the end-of-treatment (EOT) visit, completed within 10 days before cutoff for data collection

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
After 3 cyclesAfter 6 cyclesAt the EOT visit
Rituximab + Bendamustine78.575.290.9
Rituximab + Chlorambucil80.079.285.8

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS) in the First-Line Subpopulation

The criteria for PD and SD are identified in previous outcome measure(s). EFS was defined as the time from the first dose of trial treatment to the first documentation of PD, the beginning of new treatment for any hematologic malignancy, or death from any cause. Those with SD were considered event-free. EFS was calculated in months as [first event date minus first dose date plus 1] divided by 30.44. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: End of Cycles 3 and 6 (both treatment arms), end of Cycles 7 to 12 (Rituximab + Chlorambucil arm), after an additional 8 weeks as confirmation of response, then every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months until study cutoff (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rituximab + Bendamustine39.6
Rituximab + Chlorambucil29.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in the First-Line Subpopulation

OS was defined as the time from recorded diagnosis to death from any cause. OS was calculated in months as [death date or last-known alive date minus diagnosis date plus 1] divided by 30.44. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: End of Cycles 3 and 6 (both treatment arms), end of Cycles 7 to 12 (Rituximab + Chlorambucil arm), after an additional 8 weeks as confirmation of response, then every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months until study cutoff (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rituximab + Bendamustine43.8
Rituximab + ChlorambucilNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Death in the First-Line Subpopulation

The percentage of participants experiencing death was calculated as the number of participants with event divided by the number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: End of Cycles 3 and 6 (both treatment arms), end of Cycles 7 to 12 (Rituximab + Chlorambucil arm), after an additional 8 weeks as confirmation of response, then every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months until study cutoff (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab + Bendamustine14.9
Rituximab + Chlorambucil15.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing PD or Death in the First-Line Subpopulation

The criteria for PD are identified in previous outcome measure(s). The percentage of participants experiencing PD or death was calculated as the number of participants with event divided by the number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: End of Cycles 3 and 6 (both treatment arms), end of Cycles 7 to 12 (Rituximab + Chlorambucil arm), after an additional 8 weeks as confirmation of response, then every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months until study cutoff (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab + Bendamustine27.3
Rituximab + Chlorambucil46.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing PD, Documented Intake of New Leukemia Therapy, or Death in the First-Line Subpopulation

The criteria for PD are identified in previous outcome measure(s). The percentage of participants experiencing PD, intake of new (post-trial) leukemia therapy, or death was calculated as the number of participants with event divided by the number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: End of Cycles 3 and 6 (both treatment arms), end of Cycles 7 to 12 (Rituximab + Chlorambucil arm), after an additional 8 weeks as confirmation of response, then every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months until study cutoff (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab + Bendamustine29.8
Rituximab + Chlorambucil49.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Documented Intake of New Leukemia Therapy in the First-Line Subpopulation

The percentage of participants with documented intake of new (post-trial) leukemia therapy was calculated as the number of participants with new therapy divided by the number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: During Cycles 1 to 6 (both treatment arms), Cycles 7 to 12 (Rituximab + Chlorambucil arm), after an additional 8 weeks, then every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months until study cutoff (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab + Bendamustine9.1
Rituximab + Chlorambucil18.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Tumor Response of CR or CRi Experiencing PD or Death in the First-Line Subpopulation

The criteria for CR, CRi, and PD are identified in previous outcome measure(s). The percentage of participants experiencing PD or death was calculated as the number of participants with event divided by the number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: End of Cycles 3 and 6 (both treatment arms), end of Cycles 7 to 12 (Rituximab + Chlorambucil arm), after an additional 8 weeks as confirmation of response, then every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months until study cutoff (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab + Bendamustine17.8
Rituximab + Chlorambucil33.8

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the First-Line Subpopulation

The criteria for PD are identified in previous outcome measure(s). PFS was defined as the time from the first dose of trial treatment to the first documentation of PD or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was calculated in months as [first event date minus first dose date plus 1] divided by 30.44. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: End of Cycles 3 and 6 (both treatment arms), end of Cycles 7 to 12 (Rituximab + Chlorambucil arm), after an additional 8 weeks as confirmation of response, then every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months until study cutoff (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rituximab + Bendamustine39.6
Rituximab + Chlorambucil29.9

[back to top]

Proportion of Malignant B-cells in Normal B-cells Among Participants With a Positive Outcome for MRD in the First-Line Subpopulation

The proportion of malignant B-cells in normal B-cells was quantitatively determined, and was calculated as the number of malignant B-cells divided by the number of normal B-cells observed. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: After 6 treatment cycles (up to 24 weeks)

Interventionproportion (Mean)
Rituximab + Bendamustine0.0836
Rituximab + Chlorambucil0.1125

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Positive and Negative Outcome for MRD in the First-Line Subpopulation

Negative MRD was defined as a proportion of malignant B-cells in normal B-cells < 0.0001, and positive MRD was defined as a proportion of malignant B-cells in normal B-cells >/= 0.0001. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: After 6 treatment cycles (up to 24 weeks)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Positive outcomeNegative outcome
Rituximab + Bendamustine3048
Rituximab + Chlorambucil6414

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Tumor Response of CR, CRi, PR, or nPR Experiencing PD or Death in the First-Line Subpopulation

The criteria for CR, CRi, PR, nPR, and PD are identified in previous outcome measure(s). The percentage of participants experiencing PD or death was calculated as the number of participants with event divided by the number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: End of Cycles 3 and 6 (both treatment arms), end of Cycles 7 to 12 (Rituximab + Chlorambucil arm), after an additional 8 weeks as confirmation of response, then every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months until study cutoff (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab + Bendamustine24.6
Rituximab + Chlorambucil43.9

[back to top]

Disease-Free Survival (DFS) in the First-Line Subpopulation

The criteria for CR, CRi, and PD are identified in previous outcome measure(s). DFS was defined as the time from the first assessment of CR or CRi to the first documentation of PD or death, whichever occurred first. DFS was calculated in months as [first event date minus first assessment date of CR/CRi plus 1] divided by 30.44. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: End of Cycles 3 and 6 (both treatment arms), end of Cycles 7 to 12 (Rituximab + Chlorambucil arm), after an additional 8 weeks as confirmation of response, then every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months until study cutoff (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rituximab + Bendamustine36.8
Rituximab + Chlorambucil32.0

[back to top]

Duration of Response in the First-Line Subpopulation

The criteria for CR, CRi, PR, nPR, and PD are identified in previous outcome measure(s). Duration of response was defined as the time from the first assessment of CR, CRi, PR, or nPR to the first documentation of PD or death, whichever occurred first. Duration of response was calculated in months as [first event date minus first assessment date of CR/CRi/PR/nPR plus 1] divided by 30.44. (NCT01056510)
Timeframe: End of Cycles 3 and 6 (both treatment arms), end of Cycles 7 to 12 (Rituximab + Chlorambucil arm), after an additional 8 weeks as confirmation of response, then every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months until study cutoff (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rituximab + Bendamustine36.8
Rituximab + Chlorambucil27.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by IRC

BOR observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease & disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by baseline scan & no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic & hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable & no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain criteria needed for a CR/PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in single involved node, or size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CRPRSDPDUnable to evaluateMissing
Bendamustine Alone17.260.312.05.71.03.8
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine16.259.313.74.91.04.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by Investigator

BOR: best response for a participant, observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain the criteria needed for a CR or PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8.5 years)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CRPRSDPDUnable to evaluateMissing
Bendamustine Alone21.561.76.74.81.43.8
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine23.558.86.46.40.54.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (CFB) in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym)-Physical Well Being Sub-scale Score

"The FACT-Lym measures 5 sub-scales which includes 42 items; responses to each item range from 0, Not at all to 4, Very much. Total score ranges from 0-168. Physical Well-being sub-scale includes 7 items measured on 0-4 point scale. The total score for physical well-being sub-scale is sum of each 7 items (range: 0-28). Higher scores indicate a better participant-reported outcome (PRO)/quality of life (QoL). In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up)." (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineCFB at Cycle 3 Day 1CFB at Cycle 4 Day 1CFB at Cycle 5 Day 1CFB at End of Induction TreatmentCFB at Follow-up Month 2CFB at Follow-up Month 4CFB at Follow-up Month 6CFB at Follow-up Month 8CFB at Follow-up Month 10CFB at Follow-up Month 12CFB at Follow-up Month 14CFB at Follow-up Month 16CFB at Follow-up Month 18CFB at Follow-up Month 20CFB at Follow-up Month 22CFB at Follow-up Month 24CFB at Final Follow-upCFB at Extension Follow-up Month 6CFB at Extension Follow-up Month 18CFB at Extension Follow-up Month 24
Bendamustine Alone22.58-1.56-6.80-1.82-1.000.620.530.29-0.010.060.260.03-0.10-0.22-0.36-0.25-0.770.160.360.801.53
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine22.76-0.69-3.00-0.72-0.610.580.880.910.870.560.740.711.310.920.740.400.520.220.571.190.56

[back to top]

CFB in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Generic (FACT-G) Score

"The FACT-G is the sum of 4 sub-scales (physical, social, emotional and functional well-being) of FACT-Lym which includes total 27 items; responses to each item range from 0, Not at all to 4, Very much. Total score ranges from 0-108. Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up)." (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineCFB at Cycle 3 Day 1CFB at Cycle 4 Day 1CFB at Cycle 5 Day 1CFB at End of Induction TreatmentCFB at Follow-up Month 2CFB at Follow-up Month 4CFB at Follow-up Month 6CFB at Follow-up Month 8CFB at Follow-up Month 10CFB at Follow-up Month 12CFB at Follow-up Month 14CFB at Follow-up Month 16CFB at Follow-up Month 18CFB at Follow-up Month 20CFB at Follow-up Month 22CFB at Follow-up Month 24CFB at Final Follow-upCFB at Extension Follow Up Month 6CFB at Extension Follow Up Month 18CFB at Extension Follow Up Month 24
Bendamustine Alone79.86-1.87-9.37-2.44-1.841.532.552.54-0.532.290.682.481.541.16-1.210.64-2.390.500.482.294.48
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine80.780.110.520.06-0.921.223.063.242.493.462.822.944.094.063.051.802.280.781.744.564.47

[back to top]

CFB in FACT-Lym-Social/Family Well-being Sub-scale Score

"The FACT-Lym measures 5 sub-scales which includes 42 items; responses to each item range from 0, Not at all to 4, Very much. Total score ranges from 0-168. Social/family Well-being sub-scale includes 7 items measured on 0-4 point scale. The total score for social/family well-being sub-scale is sum of each 7 items (range: 0-28). Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up)." (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineCFB at Cycle 3 Day 1CFB at Cycle 4 Day 1CFB at Cycle 5 Day 1CFB at End of Induction TreatmentCFB at Follow-up Month 2CFB at Follow-up Month 4CFB at Follow-up Month 6CFB at Follow-up Month 8CFB at Follow-up Month 10CFB at Follow-up Month 12CFB at Follow-up Month 14CFB at Follow-up Month 16CFB at Follow-up Month 18CFB at Follow-up Month 20CFB at Follow-up Month 22CFB at Follow-up Month 24CFB at Final Follow-upCFB at Extension Follow-up Month 6CFB at Extension Follow-up Month 18CFB at Extension Follow-up Month 24
Bendamustine Alone22.04-0.21-1.00-0.34-0.65-0.020.270.05-0.680.560.060.560.360.44-0.660.29-1.29-0.19-0.35-0.15-0.41
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine22.14-0.103.11-0.34-0.88-0.57-0.26-0.08-0.370.13-0.47-0.03-0.150.040.00-0.50-0.41-0.52-0.160.710.44

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With BOR at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by Investigator

BOR: best response for a participant, observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain criteria needed for a CR or PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of induction treatment (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CRPRSDPDUnable to EvaluateMissing
Bendamustine Alone15.853.14.312.02.912.0
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine17.260.33.99.30.58.8

[back to top]

CFB in FACT-Lym-Lymphoma Sub-scale Score

"The FACT-Lym measures 5 sub-scales which includes 42 items; responses to each item range from 0, Not at all to 4, Very much. Total score ranges from 0-168. Lymphoma scale includes 15 items measured on 0-4 point scale. The total score for lymphoma sub-scale is sum of each 15 items (range: 0-60). Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up)." (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineCFB at Cycle 3 Day 1CFB at Cycle 4 Day 1CFB at Cycle 5 Day 1CFB at End of Induction TreatmentCFB at Follow-up Month 2CFB at Follow-up Month 4CFB at Follow-up Month 6CFB at Follow-up Month 8CFB at Follow-up Month 10CFB at Follow-up Month 12CFB at Follow-up Month 14CFB at Follow-up Month 16CFB at Follow-up Month 18CFB at Follow-up Month 20CFB at Follow-up Month 22CFB at Follow-up Month 24CFB at Final Follow-upCFB at Extension Follow-up Month 6CFB at Extension Follow-up Month 18CFB at Extension Follow-up Month 24
Bendamustine Alone44.790.98-2.800.751.643.442.772.331.791.902.120.480.441.180.571.890.661.620.921.804.89
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine45.611.249.501.410.742.452.393.002.522.282.892.583.272.912.832.552.731.332.982.352.23

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With BOR at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by IRC

BOR observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease & disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan & no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen; with exception of splenic & hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable & no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain criteria needed for a CR/PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or size of other lesions (e.g., splenic/hepatic nodules). IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of induction treatment (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CRPRSDPDUnable to EvaluateMissing
Bendamustine Alone12.052.410.110.62.912.0
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine11.854.911.88.82.010.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Definitive Improvement (DI) From Baseline in FACT-Lym Instrument Scores

FACT-Lym: 42-items in 5 subscales. Responses to each item range from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). FACT-Lym Lymphoma subscale includes 15 items (total score range = 0-60). FACT-Lym TOI is sum of 3 subscales (physical well-being, functional well-being, lymphoma subscale) and includes 29 items (total score range = 0-116). FACT-Lym total score is sum of 42 items (total score ranges from 0-168). For all above, higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. DI from baseline: at least 3 point increase from baseline in FACT-Lym Lymphoma subscale; at least 6 point increase from baseline in FACT Lym TOI; at least 7 point increase from baseline in FACT Lym total scores. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after EOI (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after EOI; EOI = up to Month 6). (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 5 Day 1 (C5D1) (Cycle length = 28 days), Follow-up Months 6 (FUM6), 12 (FUM12), 18 (FUM18), 24 (FUM24), Extension Follow Up Month 6 (Extension FUM6)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
C5D1 (>=3 pt increase)FUM6 (>=3 pt increase)FUM12 (>=3 pt increase)FUM18 (>=3 pt increase)FUM24 (>=3 pt increase)Ext FUM6 (>=3 pt increase)C5D1 (>=6 pt increase)FUM6 (>=6 pt increase)FUM12 (>=6 pt increase)FUM18 (>=6 pt increase)FUM24 (>=6 pt increase)Ext FUM6 (>=6 pt increase)C5D1 (>=7 pt increase)FUM6 (>=7 pt increase)FUM12 (>=7 pt increase)FUM18 (>=7 pt increase)FUM24 (>=7 pt increase)Ext FUM6 (>=7 pt increase)
Bendamustine Alone30.337.936.735.635.336.023.129.526.228.926.54424.434.131.131.120.632
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine41.747.146.553.05057.834.443.747.051.848.056.928.040.345.043.442.747.7

[back to top]

CFB in FACT-Lym-Functional Well-Being Sub-scale Score

"The FACT-Lym measures 5 sub-scales which includes 42 items; responses to each item range from 0, Not at all to 4, Very much. Total score ranges from 0-168. Functional Well-being sub-scale includes 7 items measured on 0-4 point scale. The total score for functional well-being sub-scale is sum of each 7 items (range: 0-28). Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up)." (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineCFB at Cycle 3 Day 1CFB at Cycle 4 Day 1CFB at Cycle 5 Day 1CFB at End of Induction TreatmentCFB at Follow-up Month 2CFB at Follow-up Month 4CFB at Follow-up Month 6CFB at Follow-up Month 8CFB at Follow-up Month 10CFB at Follow-up Month 12CFB at Follow-up Month 14CFB at Follow-up Month 16CFB at Follow-up Month 18CFB at Follow-up Month 20CFB at Follow-up Month 22CFB at Follow-up Month 24CFB at Final Follow-upCFB at Extension Follow-up Month 6CFB at Extension Follow-up Month 18CFB at Extension Follow-up Month 24
Bendamustine Alone17.98-0.54-0.80-0.71-0.500.310.240.95-0.271.090.181.160.910.21-0.27-0.32-0.96-0.081.010.962.22
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine17.900.381.780.670.000.651.311.260.921.001.781.221.691.841.430.820.980.500.851.902.62

[back to top]

CFB in FACT-Lym-Emotional Well-Being Sub-scale Score

"The FACT-Lym measures 5 sub-scales which includes 42 items; responses to each item range from 0, Not at all to 4, Very much. Total score ranges from 0-168. Emotional Well-being sub-scale includes 6 items measured on 0-4 point scale. The total score for emotional well-being sub-scale is sum of each 6 items (range: 0-24). Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up)." (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineCFB at Cycle 3 Day 1CFB at Cycle 4 Day 1CFB at Cycle 5 Day 1CFB at End of Induction TreatmentCFB at Follow-up Month 2CFB at Follow-up Month 4CFB at Follow-up Month 6CFB at Follow-up Month 8CFB at Follow-up Month 10CFB at Follow-up Month 12CFB at Follow-up Month 14CFB at Follow-up Month 16CFB at Follow-up Month 18CFB at Follow-up Month 20CFB at Follow-up Month 22CFB at Follow-up Month 24CFB at Final Follow-upCFB at Extension Follow-up Month 6CFB at Extension Follow-up Month 18CFB at Extension Follow-up Month 24
Bendamustine Alone17.380.61-0.600.370.530.661.340.890.260.69-0.070.460.130.42-0.430.180.060.38-0.44-0.081.04
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine17.810.783.400.500.590.670.950.960.971.320.951.071.041.000.940.971.120.340.390.750.97

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR) as Assessed by IRC

DoR: time from first objective response of CR/PR to first occurrence of PD/relapse/death from any cause. CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable evidence of disease & disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; liver, spleen returned to normal size; if bone marrow involved by lymphoma before treatment, infiltrate must be cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% measurable disease regressed vs. to baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes/liver/spleen, exception: splenic, hepatic nodules; other organs involved is usually assessable; no measurable disease present. PD: any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis appear during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in single involved node, or size of other lesions. DoR estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. IRC review performed up to clinical cutoff date 1 May 2015. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine Alone12.7
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine38.5

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR) as Assessed by Investigator

DoR: time from first objective response of CR/PR to first occurrence of PD/relapse/death from any cause. CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy; liver, spleen returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline); if bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic, hepatic nodules; involvement of other organs is usually assessable; no presence of measurable disease. PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in single involved node, or size of other lesions. DoR was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine Alone12.7
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine32.3

[back to top]

Disease-Free Survival (DFS) in Participants With CR as Assessed by IRC

DFS was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented CR until progression on the basis of the IRC assessments (as per modified response criteria for iNHL [Modified Cheson et al, 2007]) or death from any cause on study. CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or size of other lesions. DFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine Alone13.2
Obinutuzumab + BendamustineNA

[back to top]

Disease-Free Survival (DFS) in Participants With CR as Assessed by Investigator

DFS was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented CR until progression on the basis of the IRC assessments (as per modified response criteria for iNHL [Modified Cheson et al, 2007]) or death from any cause on study. CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or size of other lesions. DFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine Alone20.0
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine36.0

[back to top]

CFB in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score During Induction Phase

"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeter (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). For 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm, participants who had their follow-up Month 2 and 4 visits before start of maintenance treatment were reported in induction phase results under CFB at Follow-up Month 2 and CFB at Follow-up Month 4 categories." (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4 and 14

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineCFB at Cycle 3 Day 1CFB at Cycle 4 Day 1CFB at Cycle 5 Day 1CFB at End of Induction TreatmentCFB at Follow-up Month 2CFB at Follow-up Month 14
Bendamustine Alone69.480.91-14.000.355.715.1910.00

[back to top]

CFB in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score During Induction Phase

"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeter (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). For 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm, participants who had their follow-up Month 2 and 4 visits before start of maintenance treatment were reported in induction phase results under CFB at Follow-up Month 2 and CFB at Follow-up Month 4 categories." (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4 and 14

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineCFB at Cycle 3 Day 1CFB at Cycle 4 Day 1CFB at Cycle 5 Day 1CFB at End of Induction TreatmentCFB at Follow-up Month 2CFB at Follow-up Month 4
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine68.033.32-4.335.175.826.850.00

[back to top]

CFB in Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EuroQoL-5D/EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score During Induction Phase

"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). For 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm, participants who had their follow-up Month 2 and 4 visits before start of maintenance treatment were reported in induction phase results under CFB at Follow-up Month 2 and CFB at Follow-up Month 4 categories." (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4 and 14

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineCFB at Cycle 3 Day 1CFB at Cycle 4 Day 1CFB at Cycle 5 Day 1CFB at End of Induction TreatmentCFB at Follow-up Month 2CFB at Follow-up Month 14
Bendamustine Alone0.770.03-0.100.010.010.060.12

[back to top]

CFB in EQ-5D VAS Score During Maintenance Phase

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. Data for this outcome was planned to be reported only for 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). Follow-up months were during maintenance phase. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction) (end of induction = up to Month 6)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
CFB at Follow-up Month 2CFB at Follow-up Month 4CFB at Follow-up Month 6CFB at Follow-up Month 8CFB at Follow-up Month 10CFB at Follow-up Month 12CFB at Follow-up Month 14CFB at Follow-up Month 16CFB at Follow-up Month 18CFB at Follow-up Month 20CFB at Follow-up Month 22CFB at Follow-up Month 24CFB at Final Follow-up
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine-40.005.596.044.794.625.735.456.666.137.566.978.284.47

[back to top]

CFB in Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EuroQoL-5D/EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score During Induction Phase

"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). For 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm, participants who had their follow-up Month 2 and 4 visits before start of maintenance treatment were reported in induction phase results under CFB at Follow-up Month 2 and CFB at Follow-up Month 4 categories." (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4 and 14

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineCFB at Cycle 3 Day 1CFB at Cycle 4 Day 1CFB at Cycle 5 Day 1CFB at End of Induction TreatmentCFB at Follow-up Month 2CFB at Follow-up Month 4
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine0.790.00-0.070.020.010.04-0.12

[back to top]

CFB in EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score During Maintenance Phase

"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. Data for this outcome was planned to be reported only for 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). Follow-up months were during maintenance phase." (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction) (End of induction = up to Month 6)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
CFB at Follow-up Month 2CFB at Follow-up Month 4CFB at Follow-up Month 6CFB at Follow-up Month 8CFB at Follow-up Month 10CFB at Follow-up Month 12CFB at Follow-up Month 14CFB at Follow-up Month 16CFB at Follow-up Month 18CFB at Follow-up Month 20CFB at Follow-up Month 22CFB at Follow-up Month 24CFB at Final Follow-up
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine-0.150.030.040.040.030.060.060.050.050.050.050.030.03

[back to top]

CFB in EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score During Maintenance Phase

"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. Data for this outcome was planned to be reported only for 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). Follow-up months were during maintenance phase." (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction) (End of induction = up to Month 6)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
CFB at Follow-up Month 4CFB at Follow-up Month 6CFB at Follow-up Month 8CFB at Follow-up Month 10
Bendamustine Alone0.150.150.150.15

[back to top]

CFB in EQ-5D VAS Score During Maintenance Phase

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. Data for this outcome was planned to be reported only for 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). Follow-up months were during maintenance phase. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction) (end of induction = up to Month 6)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
CFB at Follow-up Month 4CFB at Follow-up Month 6CFB at Follow-up Month 8CFB at Follow-up Month 10
Bendamustine Alone5.005.005.00-15.00

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by IRC

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death as assessed by an IRC according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). To be PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of <1.0 cm must increase by ≥ 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node >1 cm in its short axis. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and 95% confidence interval (CI) for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1, then every 3 months up to 2 years and every 6 months for next 2 years [up to 4.5 years overall])

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine Alone14.1
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine29.2

[back to top]

PFS as Assessed by Investigator

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD as assessed by an investigator according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007), or death from any cause on study. PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of <1.0 cm must increase by ≥ 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node >1 cm in its short axis. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to 8.5 years overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine Alone14.1
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine25.8

[back to top]

CFB in FACT-Lym Total Score

"FACT-Lym total score is the sum of physical well-being score (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and Lymphoma sub-scale (15 items); responses to each item range from 0, Not at all to 4, Very much. Total score ranges from 0-168. Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up)." (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineCFB at Cycle 3 Day 1CFB at Cycle 4 Day 1CFB at Cycle 5 Day 1CFB at End of Induction TreatmentCFB at Follow-up Month 2CFB at Follow-up Month 4CFB at Follow-up Month 6CFB at Follow-up Month 8CFB at Follow-up Month 10CFB at Follow-up Month 12CFB at Follow-up Month 14CFB at Follow-up Month 16CFB at Follow-up Month 18CFB at Follow-up Month 20CFB at Follow-up Month 22CFB at Follow-up Month 24CFB at Final follow-upCFB at Extension Follow Up Month 6CFB at Extension Follow Up Month 18CFB at Extension Follow Up Month 24
Bendamustine Alone124.56-0.74-12.16-1.680.025.105.405.031.484.582.973.182.252.16-0.892.15-2.132.151.224.929.69
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine126.221.3322.531.710.353.545.506.575.185.705.885.927.596.995.664.595.282.555.146.886.13

[back to top]

Time to Deterioration of FACT-Lym TOI

"The median time, in month, from date of randomization until a clinically meaningful decline from baseline in TOI or death, whichever occurred first. TOI: sum of physical well-being score,functional well-being score, and Lymphoma sub-scale of FACT-Lym; total 29 items, responses to each item range from 0, Not at all to 4, Very much. Total score ranges from 0-116. Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. A clinically meaningful decline in TOI score was defined as at least a 6 point decline from baseline. Time to deterioration was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (EOI) (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up)." (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 8.5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Bendamustine Alone5.6
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine8.0

[back to top]

CFB in FACT-Lym Trial Outcome Index (TOI)

"TOI is the sum of 3 sub-scales (physical well-being, functional well-being, and Lymphoma sub-scale) of FACT-Lym which includes total 29 items; responses to each item range from 0, Not at all to 4, Very much. Total score ranges from 0-116. Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up)." (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineCFB at Cycle 3 Day 1CFB at Cycle 4 Day 1CFB at Cycle 5 Day 1CFB at End of Induction TreatmentCFB at Follow-up Month 2CFB at Follow-up Month 4CFB at Follow-up Month 6CFB at Follow-up Month 8CFB at Follow-up Month 10CFB at Follow-up Month 12CFB at Follow-up Month 14CFB at Follow-up Month 16CFB at Follow-up Month 18CFB at Follow-up Month 20CFB at Follow-up Month 22CFB at Follow-up Month 24CFB at Final Follow-upCFB at Extension Follow Up Month 6CFB at Extension Follow Up Month 18CFB at Extension Follow Up Month 24
Bendamustine Alone84.66-1.94-10.40-1.38-0.523.753.813.261.363.522.052.250.751.36-0.642.26-0.140.842.304.0210.04
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine84.761.8126.442.370.404.605.186.075.364.946.135.136.787.266.365.305.303.845.537.317.07

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by IRC

Objective response was defined as having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of induction treatment (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine Alone64.4
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine66.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by Investigator

Objective response was defined as having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of induction treatment (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine Alone68.9
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine77.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by IRC

Objective response was defined as having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine Alone77.5
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine75.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by Investigator

Objective response was defined as having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine Alone83.3
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine82.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Died

(NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until death (up to 8.5 years overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine Alone49.3
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine41.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death from any cause. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until death (up to 8.5 years overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine Alone65.6
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine88.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD) as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) or Death

PD was assessed by an IRC according to the modified response criteria for indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (iNHL) (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 centimeters (cm) in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50 percent (%) increase from nadir in the sum of product diameter (SPD) of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (example: splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of less than (<) 1.0 cm must increase by greater than or equal to (≥) 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node greater than (>) 1 cm in its short axis. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cycle [Cy] 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1, then every 3 months up to 2 years and every 6 months for next 2 years [up to 4.5 years overall])

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bendamustine Alone125
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine87

[back to top]

Number of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by Investigator

PD was assessed by an investigator according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of <1.0 cm must increase by ≥ 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node >1 cm in its short axis. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to 8.5 years overall))

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bendamustine Alone152
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine132

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) as Assessed by IRC

EFS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of PD/relapse based on IRC assessments (as per modified response criteria for iNHL [Modified Cheson et al, 2007]), death from any cause on study, or start of a new anti-lymphoma therapy. PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or size of other lesions. EFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015. (NCT01059630)
Timeframe: Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine Alone13.7
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine25.3

[back to top]

Worst Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 Grades for Hematology Laboratory Tests Results Overall

Grade 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe/medically significant, 4=Life-threatening. Overall is defined as the worst postbaseline grade value for each patient and laboratory test across all cycles. Only postbaseline grades are summarized. If absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and neutrophils absolute (ABS) were both measured, the worse grade value from the two was summarized. Otherwise the worst ANC grade value or the worst neutrophils ABS grade value was summarized. WBC=white blood cell; LLN=lower limit of normal (NCT01073163)
Timeframe: Adverse events were collected throughout the study and up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug. The median number of 28-day cycles was 6.0. The median duration of the treatment period was 143 days.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ANC, Grade 1: ANC, Grade 2: <1.5 - 1.0*10^9/LANC, Grade 3: <1.0 - 0.5*10^9/LANC, Grade 4: <0.5*10^9/LANC, Grade 1-4Hemoglobin, Grade 1: Hemoglobin, Grade 2: <100 - 80 g/LHemoglobin, Grade 3: <80 - 65 g/LHemoglobin, Grade 4: <65 g/LHemoglobin, Grade 1-4Lymphocytes ABS, Grade 1: Lymphocytes ABS, Grade 2: <0.8 - 0.5*10^9/LLymphocytes ABS, Grade 3: <0.5 - 0.2*10^9/LLymphocytes ABS, Grade 4: <0.2*10^9/LLymphocytes ABS, Grade 1-4Platelets, Grade 1: Platelets, Grade 2: <75.0 - 50.0*10^9/LPlatelets, Grade 3: <50.0 - 25.0*10^9/LPlatelets, Grade 4: <25.0*10^9 /LPlatelets, Grade 1-4WBC, Grade 1: WBC, Grade 2: <3.0 - 2.0*10^9/LWBC, Grade 3: <2.0 - 1.0*10^9/LWBC, Grade 4: <1.0*10^9/LWBC, Grade 1-4
Bendamustine With Rituximab5121112403612104902132237199313291915548

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in QTcF at Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Bendamustine and Its Metabolites (M3 and M4)

Results from a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model to show the relationship of the overall predicted change from Baseline in QTcF at the average Cmax of bendamustine and its metabolites M3 and M4. (NCT01073163)
Timeframe: Baseline ECGs (Day 2 of Cycle 1): 15 minutes prior to bendamustine infusion. Postinfusion ECGs (Day 2 of Cycle 1): at the end of the 30-minute infusion and 1 hour postinfusion.

Interventionms (Mean)
BendamustineMetabolite M3Metabolite M4
Bendamustine With Rituximab5.40975.99957.1390

[back to top]

Model-predicted Bayesian Bendamustine Clearance in the Presence of Rituximab

Boxplots of model-predicted Bayesian bendamustine clearance (CL) values in the presence of rituximab were generated based on the administered bendamustine doses, rate of infusion, and sample times. (NCT01073163)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 1: prior to start of bendamustine infusion, immediately postinfusion, 15 minutes and 30 minutes postinfusion. Day 2 of Cycle 1: 15 minutes prior to start of bendamustine infusion, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1, 3, and 5 hours postinfusion.

InterventionL/h (Median)
Bendamustine With Rituximab32.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With New Onset ECG Waveform Morphological Changes

The core ECG laboratory cardiologist assessed all leads in the ECGs and defined morphological changes. Changes from baseline (looking at each of the 3 ECGs at Day 2 Cycle 1 individually and the ECGs at all on-treatment time points individually) were noted for the following events: atrial fibrillation or flutter; second degree heart block; third degree heart block; complete right bundle branch block; complete left bundle branch block; ST segment depression; T wave abnormalities (negative T waves only); myocardial infarction pattern; any new abnormal U waves. (NCT01073163)
Timeframe: Baseline ECGs (Day 2 of Cycle 1): 15 minutes prior to bendamustine infusion. Postinfusion ECGs (Day 2 of Cycle 1): at the end of the 30-minute infusion and 1 hour postinfusion.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bendamustine With Rituximab0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR)

Complete response, as defined by the International Working Group (IWG) Revised Response Criteria For Malignant Lymphoma. Results are presented for participants with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma as well as all participants. (NCT01073163)
Timeframe: The median number of 28-day cycles was 6.0. The median duration of the treatment period was 143 days.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma40
Mantle Cell Lymphoma55
Total43

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response

Overall Response was comprised of those participants who had Complete Response (CR) plus those who had Partial Response (PR), as defined by the International Working Group (IWG) Revised Response Criteria For Malignant Lymphoma. Results are presented for participants with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma as well as all participants. (NCT01073163)
Timeframe: The median number of 28-day cycles was 6.0. The median duration of the treatment period was 143 days.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma93
Mantle Cell Lymphoma100
Total94

[back to top]

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Endpoint

The investigator assessed each patient's ECOG performance status according to the ECOG scale at screening, on Day 1 of each treatment cycle, and at the end-of-treatment visit. Scale scores were: 0=fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature; 2=ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3=capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4=completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair; 5=dead. Any change in score to a higher value signifies worsening, and any change to a lower value signifies improvement. (NCT01073163)
Timeframe: End of study. The median number of 28-day cycles was 6.0. The median duration of the treatment period was 143 days.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ImprovedStayed the sameWorsened
Bendamustine With Rituximab10358

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in QT Interval as Corrected by the Fridericia Method (QTcF) at End of Infusion

On Day 2 of Cycle 1, three electrocardiograms (ECGs) were collected 15 minutes prior to any study drug administration. The baseline ECG interval value was obtained by averaging these 3 ECGs, and was compared to the average of the 3 ECGs taken on treatment with bendamustine at the end of the infusion. (NCT01073163)
Timeframe: Baseline ECGs (Day 2 of Cycle 1): 15 minutes prior to bendamustine infusion. Postinfusion ECGs (Day 2 of Cycle 1): at the end of the 30-minute infusion.

Interventionmilliseconds (ms) (Mean)
Baseline, n=53End of Infusion, n=52
Bendamustine With Rituximab410.46.7

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in QTcF at 1 Hour Postinfusion

On Day 2 of Cycle 1, three ECGs were collected 15 minutes prior to any study drug administration. The baseline ECG interval value was obtained by averaging these 3 ECGs, and was compared to the average of the 3 ECGs taken on treatment with bendamustine 1 hour postinfusion. (NCT01073163)
Timeframe: Baseline ECGs (Day 2 of Cycle 1): 15 minutes prior to bendamustine infusion. Postinfusion ECGs (Day 2 of Cycle 1): 1 hour postinfusion.

Interventionms (Mean)
Baseline1 Hour Postinfusion
Bendamustine With Rituximab410.44.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With QTcF New Outlier Events at End of Infusion and 1 Hour Postinfusion

"Participants were considered to have an outlier ECG value based on the most extreme value across each of the time points. New means not present at baseline and becomes present on at least 1 on-treatment ECG time point. A participant had a new outlier event (500) if the maximum QTcF was >500 ms while their baseline was <=500 ms, or had an outlier event (480) if the maximum QTcF was >480 ms while their baseline was <= 480 ms. QTcF in the 30-60 ms or >60 ms categories were also considered outliers." (NCT01073163)
Timeframe: Baseline ECGs (Day 2 of Cycle 1): 15 minutes prior to bendamustine infusion. Postinfusion ECGs (Day 2 of Cycle 1): at the end of the 30-minute infusion and 1 hour postinfusion.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
QTcF New >500 ms at End of Infusion; n=52QTcF New >500 ms 1 Hour Postinfusion; n=53QTcF New >480 ms at End of Infusion; n=52QTcF New >480 ms 1 Hour Postinfusion; n=53QTcF New >60 ms at End of Infusion; n=52QTcF New >60 ms 1 Hour Postinfusion; n=53QTcF New 30-60 ms at End of Infusion; n=52QTcF New 30-60 ms 1 Hour Postinfusion; n=53
Bendamustine With Rituximab00100000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Cardiac Disorders

Number of participants with cardiac disorders overall, with severity from grades 1 (mild) to grade 4 (severe), according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening, grade 5= death). Participants may have reported more than 1 event. (NCT01073163)
Timeframe: Adverse events were collected throughout the study and up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug. The median number of 28-day cycles was 6.0. The median duration of the treatment period was 143 days.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ECG QT prolonged: OverallECG QT prolonged: Grade >/=3Blood pressure decreased: OverallBlood pressure decreased: Grade >/=3Cardiac murmur: OverallCardiac murmur: Grade >/=3ECG ST segment abnormal: OverallECG ST segment abnormal: Grade >/=3Heart rate irregular: OverallHeart rate irregular: Grade >/=3Palpitations: OverallPalpitations: Grade >/=3Arteriosclerosis coronary artery: OverallArteriosclerosis coronary artery: Grade >/=3Atrial fibrillation: OverallAtrial fibrillation: Grade >/=3Cardiac failure congestive: OverallCardiac failure congestive: Grade >/=3Left ventricular dysfunction: OverallLeft ventricular dysfunction: Grade >/=3Sinus tachycardia: OverallSinus tachycardia: Grade >/=3Tachycardia: OverallTachycardia: Grade >/=3
Bendamustine With Rituximab321110101020101010111010

[back to top]

Overview of Adverse Events

Adverse event (AE)=any untoward medical occurrence in a patient administered study drug that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study of a pharmaceutical product and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Treatment-related AEs=those that began or worsened after treatment with study drug. AE severity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (grade 1=mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3=severe, grade 4=life-threatening, grade 5= death). Relationship of an AE to study drug was categorized as definite, probable, possible, unlikely, or not related. Serious AE (SAE)=one that occurred at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes or actions: death; a life-threatening adverse event; inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; a persistent or significant disability/incapacity; a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or an otherwise important medical event. (NCT01073163)
Timeframe: Adverse events were collected throughout the study and up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug. The median number of 28-day cycles was 6.0. The median duration of the treatment period was 143 days.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventSevere adverse events (grade 3, 4, 5)Treatment-related adverse eventsDeathsOther serious adverse eventsWithdrawn from study due to adverse events
Bendamustine With Rituximab5333521141

[back to top]

Rituximab Concentrations at 0.5 Hours, 24 Hours, and 7 Days Postinfusion

(NCT01073163)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 1: prior to start of rituximab infusion, immediately postinfusion. Day 2 of Cycle 1: 15 minutes prior to the start of the bendamustine infusion. Day 7 and Day 14: anytime. Day 1 of Cycle 2: prior to start of rituximab infusion.

Interventionmcg/mL (Median)
0.5 Hours Postinfusion; n=1924 Hours Postinfusion; n=197 Days Postinfusion; n=17
Bendamustine With Rituximab173.0105.030.5

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Participants With Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Per IRC

PFS is defined as the time interval between randomization until disease progression or death (due to any cause). (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause (67.5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)16.62
Benda (Arm B)12.12

[back to top]

Reduction in Tumor Size

Tumor size was measured by the mean change in the sum of the products of the greatest diameter (SPD) of the largest abnormal nodes from baseline to post-baseline by CT Scan. (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: baseline, post-baseline (up to 55 months)

Interventionmm^2 (Mean)
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)-33.2
Benda (Arm B)-32.8

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Time to Progression in All Participants Per IRC

Time from randomization until disease progression (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of first documented disease progression, whichever occurred first, reported betwen day of first participant randomized up to about 67.5 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)19.35
Benda (Arm B)16.56

[back to top]

Time to Progression in Participants With FL Per IRC

Time from randomization until disease progression (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of first documented disease progression, whichever occurred first, reported betwen day of first participant randomized up to about 67.5 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)19.35
Benda (Arm B)13.80

[back to top]

Time to Response in All Participants Per IRC

Time to response = time from randomization to the first response (CR/ PR). If no CR/PR value was present data was to be censored at last adequate assessment. (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: From randomization to up to 67.5 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)2.86
Benda (Arm B)2.89

[back to top]

Time to Response in Participants With FL Per IRC

Time to response = time from randomization to the first response (CR/ PR). If no CR/PR value was present data was to be censored at last adequate assessment. (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: From randomization to up to 67.5 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)2.86
Benda (Arm B)2.86

[back to top]

B-cell Monitoring (CD19+, CD20+)

The percent change of CD5+CD19+ and CD5-CD19+ from baseline was summarized to assess the treatment effect, to monitor the normal B-cell population, and to follow their recovery. (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: C5D1 (month 5), 1M post-D252, 9M post-D252, up to 67.5 months; Cycle = 21 days

Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
C5D1: CD45+CD19+C1D1: CD45+CD20+
Benda (Arm B)-97.0-98.0

[back to top]

B-cell Monitoring (CD19+, CD20+)

The percent change of CD5+CD19+ and CD5-CD19+ from baseline was summarized to assess the treatment effect, to monitor the normal B-cell population, and to follow their recovery. (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: C5D1 (month 5), 1M post-D252, 9M post-D252, up to 67.5 months; Cycle = 21 days

Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
C5D1: CD45+CD19+1M post-D252: CD45+CD19+9M post-D252: CD45+CD19+C1D1: CD45+CD20+1M post-D252: CD45+CD20+9M post-D252: CD45+CD20+
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)-94.0-82.01421.0-100.0-100.0925.0

[back to top]

Human Anti-chimeric Antibodies (HACA) Over Time

The number of participants with positive and negative baseline HACA results (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: At Baseline and Cycle 1 day 1

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline: NegativeBaseline: PositiveC1D1: NegativeC1D1:Positive
Benda (Arm B)1192311923
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)1452514525

[back to top]

Plasma Ofatumumab Concentrations

Concentrations of ofatumumab in plasma listed by actual relative time and summarized by nominal time. (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: C1D1, C7D1, C12D1, C1D1, C12D1, 12M post-D252, withdrawal up to 12 months follow up

Interventionug/mL (Mean)
C1D1 pre-doseC1D1 End of infusion (EOI)C1D1 1h post-EOIC7D1 pre-doseC7D1 EOIC7D1 1h post-EOIC12D1 pre-doseC12D1 EOI12M post-D252Withdrawal
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)1.1262.0283.2153.6402.2419.1143.5392.00.929.6

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

PRO - Change From Baseline in HRQL Measures in All Participants: The EQ-5D

"The EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) is a self-administered, generic, indirect utility measure used for health economic analysis.EQ-5D should be answered as one of 3 levels about current condition for 5 dimensions and was calculated total average by giving a weighting on 3 level of answers (EQ-5D levels into 'no problems' (level 1) and 'problems' (level 2 and 3)).~Table of scores by each level for EQ-5D items: mobility(level 1=0, level2=0.069,level 3=0.314), self care(level 1=0, level2=0.104,level 3=0.214), usual activities(level 1=0, level2=0.036,level 3=0.094), pain/discomfort (level 1=0, level2=0.,level 3=0.386) and anxiety/depression(level 1=0, level2=0.071,level 3=0.2)~*EQ-5D Total = 1 - 0.081 - (the score of the each level) - 0.269 (if at least one of level 3 presents)" (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: administered at screening and C5D1 (month 5), C11D1 (month 11), D252, 12m post-D252, withdrawal (24m post-D252) up to 67.5 months; Cycle = 21 days

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
EQ5D01-EQ VAS Score C5D1EQ5D01-EQ VAS Score C11D1EQ5D01-EQ VAS Score D252EQ5D01-EQ VAS Score 12M post-D252EQ5D01-EQ VAS Score WithdrawalEuroQoL Tariffs C5D1EuroQoL Tariffs C11D1EuroQoL Tariffs D252EuroQoL Tariffs 12M post-D252EuroQoL Tariffs Withdrawal
Benda (Arm B)-3.82.7-0.87.10.70.00.00.10.00.1
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)5.812.9-11.714.7-14.70.210.1-0.40.0-0.2

[back to top]

PRO - Change From Baseline in HRQL Measures in Participants With FL: The EQ-5D

"The EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) is a self-administered, generic, indirect utility measure used for health economic analysis.EQ-5D should be answered as one of 3 levels about current condition for 5 dimensions and was calculated total average by giving a weighting on 3 level of answers (EQ-5D levels into 'no problems' (level 1) and 'problems' (level 2 and 3)).~Table of scores by each level for EQ-5D items: mobility(level 1=0, level2=0.069,level 3=0.314), self care(level 1=0, level2=0.104,level 3=0.214), usual activities(level 1=0, level2=0.036,level 3=0.094), pain/discomfort (level 1=0, level2=0.,level 3=0.386) and anxiety/depression(level 1=0, level2=0.071,level 3=0.2)~*EQ-5D Total = 1 - 0.081 - (the score of the each level) - 0.269 (if at least one of level 3 presents)" (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: administered at screening and C5D1 (month 5), C11D1 (month 11), D252, 12m post-D252, withdrawal (24m post-D252) up to 67.5 months; Cycle = 21 days

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
EQ5D01-EQ VAS Score C5D1EQ5D01-EQ VAS Score C11D1EQ5D01-EQ VAS Score D252EQ5D01-EQ VAS Score 12M post-D252EQ5D01-EQ VAS Score WithdrawalEuroQoL Tariffs C5D1EuroQoL Tariffs C11D1EuroQoL Tariffs D252EuroQoL Tariffs 12M post-D252EuroQoL Tariffs Withdrawal
Benda (Arm B)-6.51.1-7.56.75.40.00.00.40.00.1
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)5.512.90.0014.2-18.50.00.10.00.0-0.1

[back to top]

PRO - Change in Health Treatment in HRQL Measures in All Participants: The Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)

The Health Change Questionnaire,(HCQ) used is a nine item scale that asks the patient to rate change in status since beginning treatment on this study. For HCQ, values from 1 to 9 were assigned to the 9 responses in the HCQ questionnaire, ranging from 1 for 'my health is a great deal better' to 9 for 'my health is a great deal worse' since the beginning of the study. Lower scores represent better conditions (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: administered at screening and C5D1 (month 5), C11D1 (month 11), D252, 12m post-D252, withdrawal (24m post-D252) up to 67.5 months; Cycle = 21 days

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Change in health treatment C5D1Change in health treatment C11D1Change in health treatment D252Change in health treatment 12M post D252Change in health treatment Withdrawal
Benda (Arm B)3.82.54.82.64.3
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)2.82.65.32.45.4

[back to top]

PRO - Change in Health Treatment in HRQL Measures in Participants With FL: The Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)

The Health Change Questionnaire, (HCQ) used is a nine item scale that asks the patient to rate change in status since beginning treatment on this study. For HCQ, values from 1 to 9 were assigned to the 9 responses in the HCQ questionnaire, ranging from 1 for 'my health is a great deal better' to 9 for 'my health is a great deal worse' since the beginning of the study. Lower scores represent better conditions (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: administered at screening and C5D1 (month 5), C11D1 (month 11), D252, 12m post-D252, withdrawal (24m post-D252) up to 67.5 months; Cycle = 21 days

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Change in health treatment C5D1Change in health treatment C11D1Change in health treatment D252Change in health treatment 12M post D252Change in health treatment Withdrawal
Benda (Arm B)3.92.44.52.14.2
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)2.92.73.02.77.2

[back to top]

Quantitative Assessments of Immunoglobulins A, G and M (IgA, IgG, IgM)

at scheduled visits for actual values as well as for change from baseline (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: Screening, C1D1, 1M post D252, 6M post D252, 12M post D252 up to 67.5 months; Cycle = 21 days

Interventiong/L (Mean)
IgA @ screening (BL)IgG @ screeningIgM @ screeningIgA @ C1D1IgG @ C1D1IgM @ C1D1IgA @ 1M post-D252IgG @ 1M post-D252IgM @ 1M post-D252IgA @ 6M post D252IgG @ 6M post D252IgM @ 6M post D252IgA @ 12M post D252IgG @12M post D252IgM @ 12M post D252
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)0.74.70.61.37.71.41.17.10.61.17.30.71.17.10.7

[back to top]

Summary of Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

"This is the number of participants with change in ECOG status. Change is measured categorically by Improvement, deterioration and No change. Improvement is defined as decrease from baseline by at least one step on the ECOG performance status scale. Deteriorations is defined as increase from baseline by at least one step on the ECOG performance status scale. ECOG status to evaluate daily living: 0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work; 2: Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3: Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4: Completely disabled; cannot carry on any self care.Totally confined to bed or chai; 5: Dead" (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: administered at screening and C5D1 (month 5), C11D1 (month 11), D252, 12m post-D252, withdrawal (24m post-D252) up to 67.5 months; Cycle = 21 days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
C5D1: DeterioratedC5D1: ImprovedC5D1: No ChangeC11D1: DeterioratedC11D1: ImprovedC11D1: No Change12M post D252: Deteriorated12M post-D252: Improved12M post-D252: No ChangeWithdrawal: DeterioratedWithdrawal: ImprovedWithdrawal: No Change
Benda (Arm B)24228892358612388211
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)18309413277591744728

[back to top]

Summary of Number of Participants With Human Anti-Human Antibodies (HAHA)

A summary by responders and non-responders (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: From randomization up to about 67.5 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
# of participants with post-Ofa HAHA resultswith at least 1 conf. +ve post-Ofa HAHA result-ve post-Ofa HAHA results, no Ofa conc. <200 ug/mL-ve post-Ofa HAHA, at least 1 Ofa conc<200ug/mL
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)15116144

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With FL Per IRC

ORR: Percentage of subjects achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) from the start of randomization until disease progression or the start of new anti-cancer therapy, including the optional ofatumumab for subjects in Arm B based on responses from the IRC assessment of best overall response using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (RRCML). Response criteria is CR, PR, standard disease (SD), progressive disease (PD) or not estimable. CR is the complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease & disease-related symptoms. PR is at least a 50% decrease from baseline in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of target lesions. SD is failure to attain the criteria needed for a CR, PR or PD. PD is the appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis or at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of target or non target lesions or at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter(SLD) or any Target or non target lesions. (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: From randomization until the 217th PFS event occurred, up to about 67.5 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)77
Benda (Arm B)76

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With FL

The interval of time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause. For subjects who are alive, time of death will be censored at the date of last contact. (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: From randomization up to about 89 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)NA
Benda (Arm B)53.59

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) to Optional Ofatumumab Monotherapy in Subjects Who Progressed During or Following Single-agent Bendamustine

ORR: Percentage of subjects achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) from the start of randomization until disease progression or the start of new anti-cancer therapy, including the optional ofatumumab for subjects in Arm B based on responses from the IRC assessment of best overall response using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (RRCML). Response criteria is CR, PR, standard disease (SD), progressive disease (PD) or not estimable. CR is the complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease & disease-related symptoms. PR is at least a 50% decrease from baseline in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of target lesions. SD is failure to attain the criteria needed for a CR, PR or PD. PD is the appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis or at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of target or non target lesions or at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter(SLD) or any Target or non target lesions. (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: From randomization until the 217th PFS event occurred, up to about 67.8 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Optional Ofa17

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in All Participants

The interval of time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause. For subjects who are alive, time of death will be censored at the date of last contact. (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: From randomization up to about 89 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)59.76
Benda (Arm B)58.22

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) in All Participants Per IRC

ORR: Percentage of subjects achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) from the start of randomization until disease progression or the start of new anti-cancer therapy, including the optional ofatumumab for subjects in Arm B based on responses from the IRC assessment of best overall response using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (RRCML). Response criteria is CR, PR, standard disease (SD), progressive disease (PD) or not estimable. CR is the complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease & disease-related symptoms. PR is at least a 50% decrease from baseline in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of target lesions. SD is failure to attain the criteria needed for a CR, PR or PD. PD is the appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis or at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of target or non target lesions or at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter(SLD) or any Target or non target lesions. (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: From randomization until the 217th PFS event occurred, up to about 67.5 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)73
Benda (Arm B)75

[back to top]

Duration of Response in Participants With FL Per IRC

Time (in months) from the initial response (CR/PR) to first documented sign of disease progression or death due to any cause. (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: time from the initial response (CR/PR) (Day 84) to first documented sign of disease progression or death due to any cause up to 67.5 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)16.39
Benda (Arm B)11.20

[back to top]

Duration of Response in All Participants Per IRC

Time (in months) from the initial response (CR/PR) to first documented sign of disease progression or death due to any cause. (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: time from the initial response (CR/PR) (Day 84) to first documented sign of disease progression or death due to any cause up to 67.5 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)17.71
Benda (Arm B)14.49

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

PFS is defined as the time interval between randomization until disease progression or death (due to any cause). (NCT01077518)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause (67.5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ofa + Benda (Arm A)16.66
Benda (Arm B)13.83

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Lenalidomide

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Predose, 1.5 hours postdose at Week 1 and predose at Week 5

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose (Week 1)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 1)Pre-dose (Week 5)
Lenalidomide (Cohort 7a, 7b, 7c)NA51.6NA

[back to top]

Sub-study: Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohorts 1-4)

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: pre dose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 6.0 hours post dose

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose0.5 hr post-dose1.0 hr post-dose1.5 hr post-dose2.0 hr post-dose3.0 hr post-dose4.0 hr post-dose6.0 hr post-dose
Idelalisib 100 mg (Cohort 1a, 1b)1.5437.61022.41264.71282.71001.0788.4523.7
Idelalisib 150 mg (Cohorts 2a, 2b, 3a, 3c, 3d, 3e, 3f, 3g, 4a, 4b)0.01222.11723.11599.21646.21238.5879.8489.3

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 1, Cohorts 2 and 3, Cohort 5)

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0 hours postdose at Week 0; predose, 1.5 hours postdose at Weeks 4, 12, and 24

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose (Week 0)0.5 hr post-dose (Week 0)1.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 0)2.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)3.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)4.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)6.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)Pre-dose (Week 4)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 4)Pre-dose (Week 12)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 12)Pre-dose (Week 24)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 24)
Idelalisib 100 mg (Cohort 1)0.4437.61022.41434.01282.71001.0788.4523.7416.51297.2361.91309.5369.91061.6
Idelalisib 150 mg (Cohort 5)0.01380.01600.01564.71400.01170.0795.0517.0408.01877.9433.91426.8549.1885.6
Idelalisib 150 mg (Cohorts 2 and 3)68.81231.41789.32017.31732.81296.1910.0486.0364.11808.1351.41883.0419.71840.1

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 6)

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Predose, 1.5 hours postdose at Weeks 0, 4, 12 and 24

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose (Week 0)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 0)Pre-dose (Week 4)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 4)Pre-dose (Week 12)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 12)Pre-dose (Week 24)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 24)
Idelalisib 150 mg (Cohort 6)0.01930.7530.81869.8677.91733.0346.81710.7

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 7)

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Predose, 1.5 hours postdose at Weeks 0, 5 and 13

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose (Week 0)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 0)Pre-dose (Week 5)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 5)Pre-dose (Week 13)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 13)
Idelalisib 150 mg (Cohort 7)NA1603.120.71621.3354.8592.7

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 4)

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Predose at Week 0; predose, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0 hours postdose at Week 4; predose, 1.5 hours postdose at Week 12; and predose, 1.5 hours postdose at Week 24

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose (Week 0)Pre-dose (Week 4)0.5 hr post-dose (Week 4)1.0 hr post-dose (Week 4)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 4)2.0 hr post-dose (Week 4)3.0 hr post-dose (Week 4)4.0 hr post-dose (Week 4)6.0 hr post-dose (Week 4)Pre-dose (Week 12)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 12)Pre-dose (Week 24)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 24)
Idelalisib 150 mg (Cohort 4)0.00.01119.5994.51758.2737.0605.0547.0524.0401.92018.2752.52251.1

[back to top]

Duration of Exposure to IDELA

Duration of exposure to IDELA was summarized using descriptive statistics. (NCT01088048)
Timeframe: First dose date up to 12 months

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Idelalisib + Rituximab8.1
Idelalisib + Bendamustine7.6
Idelalisib + Everolimus4.2
Idelalisib + Bortezomib5.1
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Bendamustine8.0
Idelalisib + Ofatumumab8.3
Idelalisib + Fludarabine8.9
Idelalisib + Chlorambucil8.8
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Chlorambucil8.7
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Lenalidomide7.7

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Everolimus

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Predose, 1.5 hours postdose at Weeks 0 and 4

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose (Week 0)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 0)Pre-dose (Week 4)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 4)
Everolimus (Cohort 5a)NA93.03.056.3

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Bendamustine

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0 hours postdose at Week 0

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose (Week 0)0.25 hr post-dose (Week 0)0.5 hr post-dose (Week 0)0.75 hr post-dose (Week 0)1.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)1.25 hr post-dose (Week 0)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 0)2.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)3.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)4.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)5.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)6.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)
Bendamustine (Cohorts 1b, 2b, 3a, 3b, 3f, 3g, 4b, 5c)NA3484.14694.73433.22847.21916.41211.2514.0463.478.515.34.4

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response (DOR) was defined as the interval from the first documentation of CR or PR to the earlier of the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause. (NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Idelalisib + RituximabNA
Idelalisib + BendamustineNA
Idelalisib + Everolimus5.6
Idelalisib + Bortezomib9.3
Idelalisib + Rituximab + BendamustineNA
Idelalisib + OfatumumabNA
Idelalisib + FludarabineNA
Idelalisib + ChlorambucilNA
Idelalisib + Rituximab + ChlorambucilNA
Idelalisib + Rituximab + LenalidomideNA

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

"Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).~The response definitions were based on the following standard criteria established for each indication:~CLL: International Workshop on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (IWCLL),2008~iNHL & MCL: Cheson, 2007" (NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Idelalisib + Rituximab78.4
Idelalisib + Bendamustine84.3
Idelalisib + Everolimus44.4
Idelalisib + Bortezomib61.1
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Bendamustine81.8
Idelalisib + Ofatumumab71.4
Idelalisib + Fludarabine91.7
Idelalisib + Chlorambucil66.7
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Chlorambucil93.3
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Lenalidomide71.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the interval from the start of study drug to death from any cause. (NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Idelalisib + RituximabNA
Idelalisib + BendamustineNA
Idelalisib + EverolimusNA
Idelalisib + BortezomibNA
Idelalisib + Rituximab + BendamustineNA
Idelalisib + OfatumumabNA
Idelalisib + FludarabineNA
Idelalisib + ChlorambucilNA
Idelalisib + Rituximab + ChlorambucilNA
Idelalisib + Rituximab + LenalidomideNA

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the interval from the start of study drug to the earlier of the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause.~The response definitions were based on the following standard criteria established for each indication:~CLL: International Workshop on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (IWCLL), 2008~iNHL & MCL: Cheson, 2007" (NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Idelalisib + RituximabNA
Idelalisib + BendamustineNA
Idelalisib + Everolimus4.3
Idelalisib + Bortezomib8.1
Idelalisib + Rituximab + BendamustineNA
Idelalisib + OfatumumabNA
Idelalisib + FludarabineNA
Idelalisib + ChlorambucilNA
Idelalisib + Rituximab + ChlorambucilNA
Idelalisib + Rituximab + LenalidomideNA

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response (TTR) was defined as the interval from the start of study drug to the first documentation of CR or PR. (NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Idelalisib + Rituximab1.9
Idelalisib + Bendamustine1.9
Idelalisib + Everolimus1.9
Idelalisib + Bortezomib1.9
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Bendamustine1.9
Idelalisib + Ofatumumab1.9
Idelalisib + Fludarabine1.9
Idelalisib + Chlorambucil1.9
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Chlorambucil1.9
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Lenalidomide3.0

[back to top]

Toxicity of Administration of IDELA

Percentage of participants experiencing toxicities of administration of IDELA were measured according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.02 (NCT01088048)
Timeframe: First dose date up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Idelalisib + Rituximab100.0
Idelalisib + Bendamustine100.0
Idelalisib + Everolimus100.0
Idelalisib + Bortezomib83.33
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Bendamustine100.0
Idelalisib + Ofatumumab100.0
Idelalisib + Fludarabine100.0
Idelalisib + Chlorambucil100.0
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Chlorambucil100.0
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Lenalidomide100.0

[back to top] [back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Drug Concentration by Time Curve From Time 0 Until 24 Hours After Study Drug Administration (AUC0-24) for Bendamustine and Its Metabolites (M3 and M4)

(NCT01088984)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1: before infusion, immediately following the infusion, and 3, 6, 10(±2), and 24 hours after the start of infusion. The 24-hour postinfusion sample was obtained before the start of the infusion on Day 2.

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Bendamustine; n=1, 13Metabolite M3; n=0, 2Metabolite M4; n=0, 0
Bendamustine 120 mg/m^212929.221336.89NA
Bendamustine 90 mg/m^214998.00NANA

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Drug Concentration by Time Curve From Time 0 Until the Last Measurable Plasma Concentration (AUC0-t) for Bendamustine and Its Metabolites (M3 and M4)

(NCT01088984)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1: before infusion, immediately following the infusion, and 3, 6, 10(±2), and 24 hours after the start of infusion. The 24-hour postinfusion sample was obtained before the start of the infusion on Day 2.

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Bendamustine; n=5, 37Metabolite M3; n=5, 36Metabolite M4; n=5, 37
Bendamustine 120 mg/m^211046.32701.1972.78
Bendamustine 90 mg/m^211174.86697.0943.80

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) for Bendamustine and Its Metabolites (M3 and M4)

(NCT01088984)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1: before infusion, immediately following the infusion, and 3, 6, 10(±2), and 24 hours after the start of infusion. The 24-hour postinfusion sample was obtained before the start of the infusion on Day 2.

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Bendamustine; n=5, 37Metabolite M3; n=5, 36Metabolite M4; n=5, 37
Bendamustine 120 mg/m^26401.80403.5248.27
Bendamustine 90 mg/m^25093.24311.7037.53

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Tmax) for Bendamustine and Its Metabolites (M3 and M4)

(NCT01088984)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1: before infusion, immediately following the infusion, and 3, 6, 10(±2), and 24 hours after the start of infusion. The 24-hour postinfusion sample was obtained before the start of the infusion on Day 2.

,
Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Bendamustine; n=5, 37Metabolite M3; n=5, 36Metabolite M4; n=5, 37
Bendamustine 120 mg/m^21.071.071.07
Bendamustine 90 mg/m^21.141.141.14

[back to top]

Best Overall Tumor Response Rate

Biological activity of bendamustine was defined as achieving a best response of partial response (PR), CRp, or CR. Rate was calculated as follows: number of participants in the primary analysis set achieving a best overall response of PR, CRp, or CR, divided by the number of participants in the primary analysis set. The most positive response for each patient during the study was counted. The 95% CI was calculated using binomial parameter exact method. Response was determined by the investigator, and evaluated per Jeha et al, 2006: A PR had to meet the following criteria: complete disappearance of circulating blasts and an M2 marrow (≥ 5% and ≤ 25% bone marrow blasts) and appearance of normal progenitor cells or an M1 marrow that did not qualify for CR or CRp. See Outcome Measure 2 for full definitions for CRp and CR. (NCT01088984)
Timeframe: At each treatment cycle (21 to 35 days), for a maximum of 12 cycles

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Bendamustine 120 mg/m^26

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was calculated as follows: number of participants in the primary analysis set achieving a best overall response of complete remission without platelet recovery (CRp) or complete remission (CR), divided by the number of participants in the primary analysis set. The most positive response for each patient during the study was counted. The 95% CI was calculated using binomial parameter exact method. Response was determined by the investigator, and evaluated per Jeha et al, 2006: A CR required no evidence of circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, an M1 marrow (≤ 5% bone marrow blasts), and recovery of peripheral counts (platelets ≥ 100 × 10^9/L and absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.0 × 10^9/L). A CR without platelet recovery (CRp) required all of the criteria for a CR with the exception of platelet recovery. (NCT01088984)
Timeframe: Assessed at each treatment cycle (21 to 35 days), for a maximum of 12 cycles

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Bendamustine 120 mg/m^20

[back to top]

Best Overall Tumor Response Rate, by Phase

Biological activity of bendamustine was defined as achieving a best response of partial response (PR), CRp, or CR. Rate was calculated as follows: number of participants in the primary analysis set achieving a best overall response of PR, CRp, or CR, divided by the number of participants in the primary analysis set. The most positive response for each patient during the study was counted. The 95% CI was calculated using binomial parameter exact method. Response was determined by the investigator, and evaluated per Jeha et al, 2006: A PR had to meet the following criteria: complete disappearance of circulating blasts and an M2 marrow (≥ 5% and ≤ 25% bone marrow blasts) and appearance of normal progenitor cells or an M1 marrow that did not qualify for CR or CRp. See Outcome Measure 2 for full definitions for CRp and CR. (NCT01088984)
Timeframe: At each treatment cycle (21 to 35 days), for a maximum of 12 cycles

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 1: Bendamustine 90 or 120 mg/m^218
Phase 2: Bendamustine 120 mg/m^26
Total9

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Bendamustine Combined With Fixed-Dose Fludarabine and Rituximab (FBR)

MTD defined as highest dose level in which 6 participants have been treated with /= 3 non-hematologic toxicity. Hematologic toxicity grade >/= 3 that lasts longer than 42 days considered a DLT. Hematologic toxicity graded according to the 2008 IWCLL criteria for grading. Tumor lysis not considered a DLT. (NCT01096992)
Timeframe: After 4 week cycle

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase 130

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate of Bendamustine Combined With Fixed-Dose Fludarabine and Rituximab (FBR)

Overall Response is Complete response (CR) + Partial response (PR). Overall response evaluated by 2008 International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2008 for complete or partial response and progressive disease. Complete remission (CR), requiring absence of peripheral blood clonal lymphocytes by immunophenotyping, absence of lymphadenopathy, absence of hepatomegaly or splenomegaly, absence of constitutional symptoms and satisfactory blood counts; positive or negative minimal residual disease (MRD); Partial remission (PR), defined as ≥ 50% fall in lymphocyte count, ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy or ≥ 50% reduction in liver or spleen, together with improvement in peripheral blood counts; (NCT01096992)
Timeframe: Overall response assessed 2 months after 6th or last course if participants not able to receive all 6 intended courses of treatment.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1 20 mg/m^25
Phase 1 30 mg/m^23
Phase 1 40 mg/m^25
Phase 1 50 mg/m^22
Phase 217

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), as Determined by the International Working Group (IWG) Criteria As Assessed by Investigators

The IWG criteria (Cheson et al 2007) for a CR is a complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. A PR is at least a 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses, no increase should be observed in the size of other nodes, liver or spleen, and no new sites of disease should be observed. (NCT01108341)
Timeframe: up to Week 32

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine and Ofatumumab90

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), as Determined by the International Working Group (IWG) Criteria As Assessed by Investigators

The IWG criteria (Cheson et al 2007) for a CR is a complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. (NCT01108341)
Timeframe: up to Week 32

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine and Ofatumumab67

[back to top]

Successful Mobilization and Collection of PBSCs

Count of participants with successful mobilization and collection of PBSCs. Defined as collection of > 2 x 10^6 CD34/kg. The current study will be deemed to be potentially efficacious if the observed rate of success is at least 80%. (NCT01110135)
Timeframe: Within 7 days of apheresis and within 6 weeks of receiving bendamustine hydrochloride

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy and Colony-stimulating Factor)34

[back to top]

The Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Korea

(NCT01118845)
Timeframe: Prior to and 30 min after start of administration, and 0, 30, 60, 120 min after completion of administration on Day 2 of the 1st cycle

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
SyB L-05018095.99

[back to top]

The Maximum Drug Concentration Time (Tmax) of Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Japan

(NCT01118845)
Timeframe: Prior to and 30 min after start of administration, and 0, 30, 60, 120 min after completion of administration on Day 2 of the 1st cycle

Interventionhour (Median)
SyB L-05011.0

[back to top]

The Overall Response Rate [Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR)] Determined on the Basis of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma

"CR: Disappearance of all evidence of disease. PR: Regression of measurable disease and no new sites.~For the criteria for CR, See Outcome measure 2 description.~The criteria for PR is as below.~Nodal Masses:~more than 50% decrease in sum of the product of the perpendicular diameters (SPD) of up to 6 largest dominant masses; no increase in size of other nodes~FDG-avid or PET positive prior to therapy; one or more PET positive at previously involved site~Variably FDG-avid or PET negative; regression on CT~Spleen, Liver:~more than 50% decrease in SPD of nodules (for single nodule in greatest transverse diameter); no increase in size of liver or spleen~Bone Marrow:~Irrelevant if positive prior to therapy; cell type should be specified" (NCT01118845)
Timeframe: up to 30 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
SyB L-050162.7

[back to top]

Concomitant Medication Usage

(NCT01118845)
Timeframe: up to 30 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
concomitant medications for adverse eventsconcomitant medications for complicationsconcomitant medications for supportive therapyconcomitant medications for other reasons
SyB L-050158505959

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events

(NCT01118845)
Timeframe: up to 30 weeks

InterventionEvents (Number)
Adverse eventsSerious adverse events
SyB L-0501184823

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Abnormality (Grade ≥3) in Laboratory Test Values

"Abnormalities in laboratory test values in overall study period were analyzed. Severity of abnormalities were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).~grade 1 : mild grade 2 : moderate grade 3 : severe grade 4 : life threatening or disabling grade 5 : death related to adverse event" (NCT01118845)
Timeframe: up to 30 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Subjects with grade 3 abnormalitySubjects with grade 4 abnormality
SyB L-0501254

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Adverse Event

(NCT01118845)
Timeframe: up to 30 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Subjects with adverse eventSubjects with serious adverse event
SyB L-05015914

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Grade ≥3 Physical Examination Finding

(NCT01118845)
Timeframe: up to 30 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Subjects with grade 3 Physical FindingsSubjects with grade 4 Physical Findings
SyB L-0501122

[back to top]

The Maximum Drug Concentration Time (Tmax) of Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Korea

(NCT01118845)
Timeframe: Prior to and 30 min after start of administration, and 0, 30, 60, 120 min after completion of administration on Day 2 of the 1st cycle

Interventionhour (Median)
SyB L-05010.9

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"PFS = day of the first PFS event - day of start of study treatment + 1~The definitions of PFS event are as below.~PD according to overall response on the basis of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma~PD: Any new lesion or increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir. Nodal masses; Appearance of a new lesion(s) >1.5 cm in any axis, ≥50% increase in SPD of more than one node, or ≥50% increase in longest diameter of a previously identified node >1 cm in short axis. Lesions PET positive if FDG-avid lymphoma or PET positive prior to therapy. Spleen, Liver; ≥50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previous lesions. Bone marrow; New or recurrent involvement~Disease progression during treatment period~Disease progression during follow up period~Start of treatment of new lesion~Occurrence of other multiple malignant tumors~Death" (NCT01118845)
Timeframe: up to 30 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
SyB L-0501200.0

[back to top]

The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Japan

(NCT01118845)
Timeframe: Prior to and 30 min after start of administration, and 0, 30, 60, 120 min after completion of administration on Day 2 of the 1st cycle

Interventionng・h/mL (Mean)
SyB L-050110394.39

[back to top]

The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Korea

(NCT01118845)
Timeframe: Prior to and 30 min after start of administration, and 0, 30, 60, 120 min after completion of administration on Day 2 of the 1st cycle

Interventionng・h/mL (Mean)
SyB L-05019218.56

[back to top]

The Complete Response (CR) Rate Determined on the Basis of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma

"The criteria for CR is as below~Nodal Masses:~fluorodeoxy glucose (FDG)-avid or positron emission tomography (PET) positive prior to therapy; mass of any size permitted if PET negative~Variably FDG-avid or PET negative; regression to normal size on computed tomography (CT)~Spleen, Liver:~Not palpable, nodules disappeared~Bone Marrow:~Infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy; if indeterminate by morphology, immunohistochemistry should be negative" (NCT01118845)
Timeframe: up to 30 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
SyB L-050137.3

[back to top]

The Half-life Period (t1/2) of Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Japan

(NCT01118845)
Timeframe: Prior to and 30 min after start of administration, and 0, 30, 60, 120 min after completion of administration on Day 2 of the 1st cycle

Interventionhour (Median)
SyB L-05010.39

[back to top]

The Half-life Period (t1/2) of Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Korea

(NCT01118845)
Timeframe: Prior to and 30 min after start of administration, and 0, 30, 60, 120 min after completion of administration on Day 2 of the 1st cycle

Interventionhour (Median)
SyB L-05010.48

[back to top]

The Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Unchanged SyB L-0501 in Japan

(NCT01118845)
Timeframe: Prior to and 30 min after start of administration, and 0, 30, 60, 120 min after completion of administration on Day 2 of the 1st cycle

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
SyB L-05018365.82

[back to top]

Response Rate

"The primary endpoint is the number of Participants with Response according to the criteria of the International Workshop to Standardize Response Criteria for NHL~Complete Remission (CR):~Nodes returned to normal (if GTD >15 mm before therapy, GTD now ≤15 mm; if GTD 11-15 and SA >10 mm before therapy, SA now ≤10 mm) All (non-nodal) target lesions completely resolved~Partial Remission (PR) SPD of target lesions decreased ≥50% from baseline Spleen and liver nodules regress by 50% in SPD or single lesion in GTD~Stable Disease (SD) Not enough shrinkage for PR Not enough growth for PD~Progressive Disease (PD):~SPD increase ≥50% from nadir (smallest value seen during trial) in nodal target lesions overall or in any single nodal target lesion" (NCT01133158)
Timeframe: 7 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction Rituximab, Bendamustine, Mitoxantrone, Dexamethasone57
Maintenance Rituximab35

[back to top]

Secondary Endpoints Included an Assessment of the Following Parameters: Progression-Free Survival, Disease-Free Survival, Global Survival, Duration of the Response.

(NCT01133158)
Timeframe: 7 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Progression-Free SurvivalDisease-Free SurvivalGlobal SurvivalDuration of the Response
R-BMD5651NA54

[back to top]

Median Survival

In a five year following, the median survival was obtained. (NCT01141725)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Combination Chemotherapy)7.2

[back to top]

Incidence of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 Toxicity

Toxicities will be graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0. (NCT01141725)
Timeframe: Up to day +100 after end of therapy or until the patient received an alternative treatment for leukemia, whatever happens earlier

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment A0
Treatment B0
Treatment C2

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS)

In a five year following, the disease free survival was obtained. (NCT01141725)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Treatment (Combination Chemotherapy)235

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose

A bayesian approach to estimate the MTD of bendamustine associated with a CR rate of at least 40% and with <30% grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicity was used (Wathen et al, 2008).The MTD of bendamustine in combination with idarubicin was determined after two cases of grade 3 toxicity were noted in the three patients entered at the 75 mg/m2 dose. The DLTs were congestive heart failure and mucositis in one patient each. Patients subsequent to this were treated at the 60 mg/m2 bendamustine dose. (NCT01141725)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionmg/m2 (Number)
Treatment (Combination Chemotherapy)60

[back to top]

Maximally Tolerated Dose of Bendamustine Hydrochloride That Can be Combined With Rituximab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoid Malignancies

Defined as dose at which approximately =< 25% of patients experience a DLT. Following completed observation of final patient, two-parameter logistic model fit to data, generating dose-response curve based on observed toxicity rate at dose levels visited. Based on this fitted model, MTD is estimated to be dose that is associated with toxicity rate of 25%. If estimate of slope parameter for fitted curve is not positive and finite, geometric mean of dose level used for last cohort and dose level that would have been assigned to next cohort is taken as MTD. (NCT01165112)
Timeframe: Up to 5 weeks after the last course

Interventionmg/m2 x 2 (Number)
Treatment (Chemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy)120

[back to top]

Ability to Proceed to Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Collection Following Treatment (Impact of This Regimen on Stem Cell Reserve)

(NCT01165112)
Timeframe: Up to 5 weeks after the last course

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy)30

[back to top]

Safety and Toxicity of This Regimen

Count of participants experiencing a dose limiting toxicity. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v)4.0 will be used to classify and grade toxicities. (NCT01165112)
Timeframe: Up to 5 weeks after the last course

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy)0

[back to top]

Preliminary Assessment of the Efficacy of This Regimen

Response will be defined by standard NCI criteria (Cheson et al) for lymphoid malignancies. (NCT01165112)
Timeframe: Up to 5 weeks after the last course

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy)33

[back to top]

Phase I & Phase II : Toxicity of Treatment Regimen

Toxicity profile (for all patients) were presented by rate of overall toxicity and rates of grade 3 or 4 toxicities analyzed separately and combined. (NCT01177683)
Timeframe: From C1D1 until death or up to a maximum of 54 months

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Number of patients had at least one adverse event of any gradeNumber of patients had at least one grade 3 or greater adverse eventNumber of patients had at least one grade 3 or greater treatment related adverse eventNumber of patients having serious adverse event
Phase I Level 1 : Bendamustine at 90mg/m^2 With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.3221
Phase I Level 2 : Bendamustine at 120mg/m^2 With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.3331
Phase II : Bendamustine in Combination With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.2419148

[back to top]

Phase II: Duration of Survival

Duration of MM patients treated with bendamustine, bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. from first date of at least partial response to the time of progression or death due to disease progression as events, with disease progression and death due to disease progression as events and deaths due to causes other than progression as censored. Censoring date will be the last disease evaluation date or date of death due to other causes as appropriate. (NCT01177683)
Timeframe: From C1D1 up to a maximum of 52 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II : Bendamustine in Combination With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.13.80

[back to top]

Phase II: Overall Survival

The time from the start of treatment to death from any cause with last date known alive as censoring date. (NCT01177683)
Timeframe: From C1D1 up to a maximum of 54 months or until death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II : Bendamustine in Combination With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.30.13

[back to top]

Phase II: Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"The time from the start of treatment of MM patients treated with bendamustine, bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. to disease progression or death (regardless of cause of death), whichever comes first. Censoring date will be the last disease evaluation date.Per modified International Myeloma Working Group criteria: Progressive disease (PD) is reported if any one of the following criteria is met:~Increase of 25% or more in serum or urine M-protein from baseline;Serum M-protein and/or the absolute increase must be ≥0.5 g/dL;Urine M-protein and/or absolute increase must be ≥200 mg/24 hours ; Development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas;Development of hyperc." (NCT01177683)
Timeframe: From C1D1 up to a maximum of 54 months until death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II : Bendamustine in Combination With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.18.96

[back to top]

Phase II : Time to Progression

"The time from the start of treatment (i.e., first dose) of MM patients treated with bendamustine, bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin to disease progression, with disease progression and death due to disease progression as events and deaths due to causes other than progression as censored. Censoring date will be the last disease evaluation date for patient without progression/death or date of death due to other diseases for patients' deaths due to other causes.Per modified International Myeloma Working Group criteria: Progressive disease (PD) is reported if any one of the following criteria is met:~Increase of 25% or more in serum or urine M-protein from baseline;Serum M-protein and/or the absolute increase must be ≥0.5 g/dL;Urine M-protein and/or absolute increase must be ≥200 mg/24 hours ; Development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas;Development of hyperc." (NCT01177683)
Timeframe: From C1D1 up to a maximum of 54 months or until death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II : Bendamustine in Combination With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.20.53

[back to top]

Phase I: MTD of Bendamustine When Combined With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.

In the first phase, MTD of bendamustine was determined in combination with bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin to gain a better idea of safe dosing before proceeding with the second phase to assess efficacy. Assuming myelosuppression being a dose-limiting effect that could have been overcome with growth factor support, MTD of the combination with myeloid growth factor support was also tested. (NCT01177683)
Timeframe: From C1D1 up to a maximum of 7 months or until death

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase I Level 1:Bendamustine at 90 mg/m^2 With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.120
Phase I Level 2:Bendamustine at 120 mg/m^2 With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal120

[back to top]

Response Per International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) Criteria

Patients had full clinical response assessment monthly during treatment, at the end of treatment (EOT) visit, 30 and 60 days after the EOT visit, and subsequently every 3 months until the earliest of progression of CLL, death, initiation of new therapy, withdrawal from the study, or completion of 18 months of follow-up evaluations. Clinical response assessment included physical examination with measurement of spleen, liver, and lymph nodes, disease-related symptoms, and laboratory measurements, specifically complete blood count (CBC) with differential. (NCT01188681)
Timeframe: 1 and 2 months after end of treatment, then every 3 months until disease progression, death, initiation of new therapy, study withdrawal, or 2 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Phase 1 15 mg/kg TRU-01666.7
Phase 1 20 mg/kg TRU-01683.3
TRU-016 and Bendamustine68.8
Bendamustine39.4

[back to top]

Response Per NCI Criteria

Overall response rate per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Working group criteria. (NCT01188681)
Timeframe: 1 and 2 months after end of treatment, then every 3 months until disease progression, death, initiation of new therapy, study withdrawal, or 2 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Phase 2: TRU-016 and Bendamustine81.3
Phase 2: Bendamustine66.7
Phase 1: 15 mg/kg TRU-016 +Beendamustine66.7
Phase 1: 20 mg/kg TRU-016 +Bendamustine100

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment

"The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is comprised of 13 items that assess fatigue and its impact with a scale of 0-4. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges between 0 and 52. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.~FACIT-Fatigue subscale score at cycle 3 is considered as mid-treatment score. If FACIT-Fatigue subscale score at cycle 3 is not available, the score at cycle 4 will be used as the mid-treatment score." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at cycle 3 or cycle 4, approximately 3 or 4 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)39.2
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)34.5
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)36.3

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration of induction treatment to progression, relapse or death, whichever occurs first. Patients alive without documented progression are censored at last disease assessment. Progression/relapse is defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, >=50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis.~The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry

Interventionyears (Median)
FLIPI 0-2/Unknown6.1
FLIPI 3-56.2

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Peripheral Neuropathy

Peripheral neuropathy was assessed using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Proportion of patients with grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy was compared between patients with subcutaneous bortezomib and patients with intravenous bortezomib. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every cycle during treatment and for 30 days after discontinuation of treatment, up to 15 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Subcutaneous Bortezomib0.06
Intravenous Bortezomib0.12

[back to top]

1-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate

"1-year post induction disease-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete remission during induction treatment and are alive and maintaining complete remission at 1 year after induction completion.~This analysis was conducted among 203 evaluable patients in the continuation treatment portion of the study. The 1-year post induction disease-free survival rate was compared between patients with FLIPI of 3-5 and patients with FLIPI of 0-2/unknown.~The FLIPI was developed in order to predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL). The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at 1 year post-induction, approximately 1.5 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
FLIPI 0-2/Unknown0.84
FLIPI 3-50.74

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival Rate

"Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. 5-year overall survival rate is the proportion of patients who were alive at 5 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.~The FLIPI was developed in order to predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL). The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
FLIPI 0-2/Unknown0.90
FLIPI 3-50.81

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at Baseline

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire that has four areas of measurements (physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being and functional well-being) with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-G total score ranges between 0 and 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)83.9
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)84.7
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)86.0

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at End of Induction Treatment

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire that has four areas of measurements (physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being and functional well-being) with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-G total score ranges between 0 and 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at cycle 6, approximately 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)86.0
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)86.5
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)84.9

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at Mid-treatment

"The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire that has four areas of measurements (physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being and functional well-being) with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-G total score ranges between 0 and 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.~FACT-G total score at cycle 3 is considered as mid-treatment score. If FACT-G total score at cycle 3 is not available, the score at cycle 4 will be used as the mid-treatment score." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at cycle 3 or cycle 4, approximately 3 or 4 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)85.5
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)84.2
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)85.2

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at Baseline

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) is a 15-item questionnaire that evaluates disease-related symptoms and concerns specific to lymphoma with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-Lym subscale score ranges between 0 and 60. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)43.8
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)44.3
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)44.9

[back to top]

1-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate

"1-year post induction disease-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete remission during induction treatment and are alive and maintaining complete remission at 1 year after induction completion.~This analysis was conducted among 250 evaluable patients with Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) data available. The proportion of patients disease-free and alive at 1 year post induction treatment was compared between patients with CIRS <10 and patients with CIRS >=10. Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at 1 year post-induction, approximately 1.5 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
CIRS <100.62
CIRS >=100.65

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment

"The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) is a 15-item questionnaire that evaluates disease-related symptoms and concerns specific to lymphoma with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-Lym subscale score ranges between 0 and 60. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.~FACT-Lym subscale score at cycle 3 is considered as mid-treatment score. If FACT-Lym subscale score at cycle 3 is not available, the score at cycle 4 will be used as the mid-treatment score." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at cycle 3 or cycle 4, approximately 3 or 4 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)47.9
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)46.8
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)46.5

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival Rate

"Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. 5-year overall survival rate is the proportion of patients who were alive at 5 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.~The 5-year overall survival rate is reported by Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score (<10 vs. >=10). Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
CIRS <100.87
CIRS >=100.80

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate

"Complete remission is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.~This analysis was conducted among 250 evaluable patients with Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) data available. The proportion of patients with complete remission was compared between patients with CIRS <10 and patients with CIRS >=10. Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
CIRS <100.70
CIRS >=100.70

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate

"Complete remission is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.~This analysis was conducted among 222 evaluable patients. The proportion of patients with complete remission was compared between patients with Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) of 3-5 and patients with FLIPI of 0-2/unknown.~The FLIPI was developed in order to predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL). The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
FLIPI 0-2/Unknown0.71
FLIPI 3-50.64

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate

"Complete remission is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.~This analysis was conducted among 222 evaluable patients for the primary analysis. The purpose of this analysis is to compare the complete remission rate of rituximab + bendamustine vs. bortezomib + rituximab + bendamustine as induction therapy, therefore, the proportion of patients with complete remission was compared between Arm B (bortezomib + rituximab + bendamustine) and Arms A and C combined (rituximab + bendamustine)." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm A and Arm C (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab)0.62
Arm B (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib)0.75

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival Rate

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. 5-year overall survival rate is the proportion of patients who were alive at 5 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)0.87
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)0.86
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)0.83

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at End of Induction Treatment

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) is a 15-item questionnaire that evaluates disease-related symptoms and concerns specific to lymphoma with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-Lym subscale score ranges between 0 and 60. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at cycle 6, approximately 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)48.9
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)48.4
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)47.2

[back to top]

3-year Progression-free Survival Rate

"Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration of induction treatment to progression, relapse or death, whichever occurs first. Patients alive without documented progression are censored at last disease assessment. 3-year progression-free survival rate is the proportion of patients who were progression-free and alive at 3 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.~Progression/relapse is defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, >=50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis.~The 3-year progression-free survival rate is reported by Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score (<10 vs. >=10). Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
CIRS <100.83
CIRS >=100.68

[back to top]

3-year Progression-free Survival Rate

"Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration of induction treatment to progression, relapse or death, whichever occurs first. Patients alive without documented progression are censored at last disease assessment. 3-year progression-free survival rate is the proportion of patients who were progression-free and alive at 3 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.~Progression/relapse is defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, >=50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)0.77
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)0.82
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)0.76

[back to top]

1-year Post-induction Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate

"1-year post induction disease-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete remission during induction treatment and are alive and maintaining complete remission at 1 year after induction completion.~The purpose of this analysis is to compare the 1-year post-induction disease-free survival (DFS) rate with rituximab plus lenalidomide to rituximab alone as continuation therapy following induction treatment of bendamustine+rituximab, therefore, patients with induction treatment of bendamustine + rituximab + bortezomib were not included in this analysis." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at 1 year post-induction, approximately 1.5 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)0.85
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)0.67

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at Baseline

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) subscale is comprised of 11 items that assess neurotoxicity with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-GOG-NTX subscale score ranges between 0 and 44. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)39.9
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)38.7
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)38.8

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) subscale is comprised of 11 items that assess neurotoxicity with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-GOG-NTX subscale score ranges between 0 and 44. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at cycle 3, approximately 3 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)40.0
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)38.6
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)39.1

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at the End of Induction Treatment

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) subscale is comprised of 11 items that assess neurotoxicity with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-GOG-NTX subscale score ranges between 0 and 44. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at end of induction treatment (cycle 6), approximately 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)39.8
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)36.1
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)39.0

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at Baseline

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is comprised of 13 items that assess fatigue and its impact with a scale of 0-4. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges between 0 and 52. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)38.6
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)37.9
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)38.1

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at End of Induction Treatment

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is comprised of 13 items that assess fatigue and its impact with a scale of 0-4. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges between 0 and 52. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at cycle 6, approximately 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)39.9
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)39.1
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)36.3

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Survival is assessed as time to death from first day of treatment The OS function for response-evaluable will be estimated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) estimator, along with 95% confidence bounds. The median survival will be estimated from the survival function. The analysis will be repeated on all patients who receive any therapy. (NCT01222260)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment Arm18.2

[back to top]

Organ Response Rate (ORR)

The proportion of response-evaluable patients experiencing ORR will be estimated, with a 95% exact binomial confidence interval. Amyloid-related organ response will be evaluated on the basis of the accepted criteria described: Kidneys: 30% reduction or drop below 0.5 g in 24-hour urine protein excretion in the absence of progressive renal insufficiency. Heart: N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) or B-type natriuretic peptide response (>30% and >300 ng/L decrease in patients with baseline NT-proBNP ≥ 650 ng/L or New York Heart Association (NYHA) class response (≥ 2 class decrease in subjects with baseline NYHA class 3 or 4). Liver: 50% decrease of an initially elevated alkaline phosphatase level or reduction in the size of the liver by at least 2 cm. Neuropathy: improvement supported by clinical history, neurologic exam, orthostatic vital signs, resolution of severe constipation or reduction of diarrhea to less than 50% of previous movements/day. (NCT01222260)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Arm7

[back to top]

Overall Hematologic Response Rate (OHR)

The proportion of response-evaluable patients experiencing OHR will be estimated, with a 95% exact binomial confidence interval. Overall hematologic response rate as defined by normalization of the free light chain levels and ratio, negative serum and urine immunofixation OR reduction in the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (dFLC) to <4 mg/dL. (NCT01222260)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Arm16

[back to top]

Partial Hematologic Response (PHR) Rate

Only patients who have received at least 2 cycles of therapy are eligible for response assessment. The proportion of patients with PHR two months post-treatment will be estimated, with a 95% exact binomial confidence interval. Partial response is defined as the reduction of the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (dFLC) of ≥ 50% OR a reduction of ≥ 50% of the M-protein if M-spike is ≥ 0.5 g/dL. (NCT01222260)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Arm16

[back to top]

Duration of Response

The duration of overall response is measured from the first date of response until the first date that the progressive disease (PD) or death is objectively documented. The hazard ratio and corresponding 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression. (NCT01232556)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years from first study drug dose or up to final study visit, whichever occurs first, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled approximately every 12 weeks.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab11.56
Rituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine6.93

[back to top] [back to top]

Health Status as Assessed by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire

EQ-5D consists of a descriptive system and an EQ visual analogue scale. The descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. The scale, the best state is marked 100 and the worst state is marked 0, is to help the participant to say how good or bad a health state is. EQ-5D index, which was reported, was derived based on US weight. The range of EQ-5D index is -0.109 to 1.00. Higher scores mean better outcomes. The average post-baseline scores for EQ-5D index were computed at approximately Week 12. The overall treatment comparisons were estimated at approximately Week 12. (NCT01232556)
Timeframe: Assessed at Day 1 of each cycle and 6-9 weeks after the last dose, Cycle 3 (Week 12) reported

InterventionUnit on a scale (Mean)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab0.79
Rituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine0.77

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact or the end of the study. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine OS. The hazard ratio and corresponding 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression. (NCT01232556)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose or up to final study visit, whichever occurs first.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab9.5
Rituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine9.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With A Best Overall Response of CR, Unconfirmed CR (unCR), PR, or Unconfirmed PR (unPR) Per NCI International Response Criteria for NHL

"CR is defined as disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease (including cleared infiltrate on repeat bone marrow aspirate/biopsy if lymphoma involvement of bone marrow before treatment).~Partial Response (PR) requires the following:~≥50 % decrease in SPD of the six largest dominant nodes or nodal masses.~No increase in the size of other nodes, liver, or spleen.~Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by ≥50% in the SPD, or for single nodules, in the greatest transverse diameter.~With the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present.~No new sites of disease. unCR and unPR means didn't have confirmatory assessment (including bone marrow assessment for CR).~The 95% CI was determined using the exact method based on binomial distribution." (NCT01232556)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years from first study drug dose or up to final study visit, whichever occurs first, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled approximately every 12 weeks.

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab41.0
Rituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine43.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With A Best Overall Response of CR or Partial Response (PR) Per NCI International Response Criteria for NHL

"CR is defined as disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease (including cleared infiltrate on repeat bone marrow aspirate/biopsy if lymphoma involvement of bone marrow before treatment).~Partial Response (PR) requires the following:~≥50 % decrease in SPD of the six largest dominant nodes or nodal masses.~No increase in the size of other nodes, liver, or spleen.~Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by ≥50% in the SPD, or for single nodules, in the greatest transverse diameter.~With the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present.~No new sites of disease. The 95% CI was determined using the exact method based on binomial distribution." (NCT01232556)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years from first study drug dose or up to final study visit, whichever occurs first, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled approximately every 12 weeks.

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab29.5
Rituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine29.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) (Safety Population)

Includes all TEAEs: Any event that occurred after the first dose of study drug and was not present prior to study drug administration or worsened in severity after study drug administration.. (NCT01232556)
Timeframe: Up to 20 weeks after the first dose of study drug

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
% participants with a TEAE% participants with serious TEAE% participants with Grade 3 or 4 TEAE% participants with Grade 5 TEAE% participants for study drug discontinuation% participants with dose reductions due to TEAEs% participants for study drug stopped temporarily
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab98.837.279.914.625.027.431.1
Rituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine100.037.779.613.818.029.346.1

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

"PFS is defined as time from date of randomization to date of progressive disease (PD, including investigator's claim of clinical progression), date of death from any cause, or initiation of a new treatment for the lymphoma due to persistent/refractory disease. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine PFS. The hazard ratio and corresponding 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression.~PD requires the following:~Appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of treatment, even if other lesions are decreasing in size.~At least a 50% increase from nadir in the sum of the product diameters of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions.~At least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node more than 1 cm in its short axis." (NCT01232556)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 2 years or final study visit, whichever occurs first, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled approximately every 12 weeks.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab3.7
Rituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine3.5

[back to top]

Evaluate the Toxicity and Tolerability of Bendamustine in Combination With Rituximab

The major grade 3 or higher adverse events were haematological toxicities. The results below include common haematological and non-haematological toxicities of grade 3 or higher. A complete record of all adverse events are reported in the adverse events section. National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 were used to assess toxicity. (NCT01234467)
Timeframe: Adverse events were collected while patients were on active treatment. The median treatment time was 18 weeks.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
LymphopeniaAnemiaNeutropeniaThrombocytopeniaLymphocytosisFatigueAnorexiaHyperglycemiaUrinary Tract InfectionArthralgiaAtrial FibrillationCognitive DisturbanceGeneralized Muscle WeaknessHeart FailureHypoalbuminemiaHyponatremiaInfusion Related ReactionMyalgiaNauseaPleural EffusionMaculopapular RashSepsisSkin Infection
Bendamustine, Rituximab7026171741399944444444444444

[back to top]

Overall Survival

This represents the Kaplan-Meier estimates of median overall survival defined as the time from start of treatment until death as a result of any cause. (NCT01234467)
Timeframe: 2 years with the median follow-up of 29 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Bendamustine, Rituximab10.2

[back to top]

Partial Response Rate

The percentage of participants achieving a partial response (PR). PR is defined by The International Harmonization Project for Response Criteria as regression of measurable disease and no new sites. (NCT01234467)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine, Rituximab26

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

The ORR consists of the complete response rate + the partial response rate (percentage of participants achieving a complete or partial response). Complete response is defined by The International Harmonization Project for Response Criteria as the complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. Partial response is defined as regression of measurable disease and no new sites. (NCT01234467)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine, Rituximab78

[back to top]

Estimate of Progression-Free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) will be summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method. PFS was defined as the time from the start of treatment until lymphoma progression or death as a result of any cause. Progression was defined by The International Harmonization Project for Response Criteria as any new lesion or increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir. (NCT01234467)
Timeframe: 2 years with the median follow-up of 29 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Bendamustine, Rituximab5.4

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR) Rate as Defined by The International Harmonization Project for Response Criteria

Complete response (CR) is defined as the complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. The complete response rate is the percentage of participants achieving a CR. (NCT01234467)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine, Rituximab52

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Response at 3 Years

The primary endpoint is complete response (CR) rate. Historical complete response (CR) rate has been 35%. This rate will be considered as the null hypothesis. (NCT01234766)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Single Arm30

[back to top]

Toxicity According to CTCAE Version 4.0

Number of patients experiencing 3 or >3 AEs (both hematological and not hematological) (NCT01244451)
Timeframe: At 44 months from treatment start.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Study Group47

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Patients still alive and known to be progression-free will be censored at the moment of last follow-up. Patients disease progression will be assessed by clinical examination, peripheral blood, bone marrow aspirate and biopsy and radiographic evaluation according to the revised IWCLL 2008 criteria. (NCT01244451)
Timeframe: Up to 32 months: from the date of first BendOfa treatment dose - induction phase - until the date of the first documentation of progressive disease or until death (whatever the cause), whichever occurs first.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendofa49

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Patients still alive will be censored at the moment of last follow-up. (NCT01244451)
Timeframe: At 44 months from treatment start.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bendofa38

[back to top]

Number of Participants Contributing to the Overall Response Rate

Patients response to treatment will be assessed by clinical examination, peripheral blood, bone marrow aspirate and biopsy and radiographic evaluation according to the revised IWCLL 2008 criteria. (NCT01244451)
Timeframe: After 8 months from therapy start (6 months of treatment plus 2 months from the last course to response evaluation)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bendofa34

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. PFS rates (percentages) at 1, 2, ,3 and 4 years are defined as the percentage of patients who are alive and progression-free at the respective time points. The p-values of the log-rank test will be calculated to compare PFS between the two arms. (NCT01286272)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

,
Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
PFS at 1 yearPFS at 2 yearsPFS at 3 yearsPFS at 4 years
Arm A (Ofatumumab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride)93.880.365.957.3
Arm B (Ofatumumab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride, Bortezomib)84.875.667.164.7

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

"A complete response was defined using International Harmonization Project Response Criteria as the complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma before treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy.~The complete response (CR) rate was calculated in newly diagnosed untreated follicular lymphoma patients receiving 6 cycles of ofatumumab-bendamustine (ARM A) and 6 cycles of ofatumumab, bortezomib, and bendamustine (ARM B).~The complete response rate was calculated as the number of patients with a complete response divided by the number of patients eligible for evaluation." (NCT01286272)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until patient stops treatment for any reason, up to 484 days post-randomization

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
Arm A (Ofatumumab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride).621
Arm B (Ofatumumab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride, Bortezomib).597

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression Free Survival up to 30 Months (FAS)

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the interval between first treatment and disease progression or death due to any cause. PFS events: progression documented between scheduled visits, death before first PD assessment (or death at baseline or prior to any adequate assessments), death between adequate assessment visits. For the PFS analysis, the survival function was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT01294579)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 30 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ofatumumab and Bendamustine29.7

[back to top]

All Deaths by Preferred Term (Safety Set) up to Approximately 30 Months

Deaths were collected and were considered to be an on treatment death up to 60 days post treatment. (NCT01294579)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 30 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Disease progressionPneumoniaMyelodysplastic syndrome -reported post studySquamous cell carcinoma of lungChronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Ofatumumab and Bendamustine31111

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) up to 30 Months (FAS)

Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the interval between first treatment and disease progression or death due to any cause. PFS criteria: A previously normal node (≤ 1.5 x ≤ 1.0cm), including nodes that were not previously visible, must increase to >2.0 x ≥ 1.5cm; ≥ 50% increase from nadir in the PPD of any target node. The long axis must increase by at least 5 mm and to >2.0cm.; ≥ 50% increase from nadir in the long axis of any target node. The long axis must increase by at least 5 mm and to >2.0 cm.; ≥ 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of target nodes and at least one node should have a long axis >1.5 cm. (NCT01294579)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 30 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PFS eventsPFS events - ProgressionPFS events - Deathcensored - follow-up ended
Ofatumumab and Bendamustine42.932.710.257.1

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) During Induction Phase After Cycle 6 (FAS)

The overall response = CR (defined in Primary Outcome) + Partial Response (PR) which required all of the following: > or = to 50% decrease from baseline in target nodules; > or = to 50% decrease in hepatic/splenic nodules and no increase in liver or spleen size; no unequivocal progression in non-target lestions; no new sites of disease. (NCT01294579)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ofatumumab and Bendamustine67.3

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate of Induction Therapy After Cycle 6 (28 Days) (FAS)

Complete response (CR) included all of the following: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. All target nodes had to have regressed to ≤ 1.5cm in the longest diameter. Non-measureable nodes 1.1 to 1.5cm in the longest diameter and >1cm in the short axis at baseline had to regress to ≤ 1cm in the short axis by visual estimation; enlarged spleen or liver (with nodules) must have returned to normal size and nodules disappeared and if bone marrow was involved, infiltrate had to have cleared on repeat biopsy sample. CR was not valid without imaging data. The corresponding 2-sided 95% exact confidence interval (CI) of the response rate was estimated by the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT01294579)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ofatumumab and Bendamustine24.5

[back to top]

Conversion Rate of Partial Response in Induction Phase to Complete Response With Maintenance Ofatumumab (FAS)

Rate of conversion from PR in the Induction phase, to CR with maintenance ofatumumab in subjects who have a PR with induction therapy with ofatumumab and bendamustine (NCT01294579)
Timeframe: Partial response in induction phase up to 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ofatumumab and Bendamustine37.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive

(NCT01300247)
Timeframe: Baseline up to relapse or progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, up to end of study (up to approximately 4 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide95.2
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine95.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response, Assessed According to International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) Guidelines

Objective response was defined as a complete response (CR), CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi) or partial response (PR), as determined by investigator. CR:required peripheral blood lymphocytes <4x10^9/L; absence of lymphadenopathy; no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly by physical examination as determined by measurement below relevant costal margin; absence of disease/constitutional symptoms; bone marrow at least normocellular for age, with <30% of nucleated cells being lymphocytes. PR:Greater than equal to (>=) 50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count, >=50% reduction in lymphadenopathy, >=50% reduction of liver and/or spleen enlargement, either neutrophil, platelet, or hemoglobin (Hb) recovery. CRi:met all CR criteria including confirmed lymphocyte infiltration <30%; may not meet Hb, platelet or neutrophil count recovery. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated by Clopper-Pearson method. The end of treatment response visit occurred 2-3 months after end of treatment. (NCT01300247)
Timeframe: Baseline up to relapse or progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first up to end of treatment response visit (up to approximately 9 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide61.9
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine90.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Human Anti-Human Antibodies (HAHAs)

(NCT01300247)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle length = 28 days) up to clinical data cutoff date 24 January 2013 (up to approximately 1.75 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Obinutuzumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide0
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Had B-Cell Recovery

B-cell recovery was defined as CD19 >=0.07×10^9/L, where participants' CD19 were previously depleted. B-cell recovery was only considered possible when the participant had received the last dose of study treatment. (NCT01300247)
Timeframe: Follow-up at 6 months, 6-12 months and after 12 months up to end of study (up to approximately 4 years)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Follow-up at 6 monthsWithin 6-12 months of follow-upAfter 12 months follow-up
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine0030.0
Obinutuzumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide09.542.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Had B-Cell Depletion

B-cell depletion was defined as cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19) <0.07×10^9/L and could occur only after at least one dose of study drug had been administered. (NCT01300247)
Timeframe: Up to the end of the treatment period, and follow-up at 6 months, 6-12 months and after 12 months up to end of study (up to approximately 4 years)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
End of the treatment periodFollow-up at 6 monthsWithin 6-12 months of follow-upAfter 12 months follow-up
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine100.0100.0100.070.0
Obinutuzumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide90.585.781.047.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Progression Free

Progressive disease assessed using IWCLL: >=50% increase in the absolute number of circulating lymphocytes to at least 5x10^9/L; Appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (>15 millimeters [mm] in longest diameter) or any new extra-nodal lesion; >=50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of lymphadenopathy; >=50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen; transformation to a more aggressive histology. (NCT01300247)
Timeframe: Baseline up to relapse or progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, up to end of study (up to approximately 4 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide90.5
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine90.0

[back to top]

Duration of Objective Response (DOR), Assessed by the Investigator According to IWCLL Guidelines

DOR for participants with OR: time from first CR, CRi or PR to disease progression (DP), relapse, or death, assessed by the investigator. DP: >=50% increase in lymphocytes to at least 5x10^9/L;new palpable lymph nodes (>15 millimeters [mm] in longest diameter) or any new extra-nodal lesion; >=50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of lymphadenopathy; >=50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen; transformation to a more aggressive histology. CR:peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) <4x10^9/L; no lymphadenopathy; no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly (below relevant costal margin); no symptoms; bone marrow at least normocellular for age, with <30% of nucleated cells being lymphocytes. PR: >=50% decrease in PBL, >=50% reduction in lymphadenopathy, >=50% reduction of liver and/or spleen enlargement, either neutrophil, platelet, or hemoglobin (Hb) recovery. CRi: met CR criteria, lymphocyte infiltration <30%; may not meet Hb, platelet or neutrophil count recovery. (NCT01300247)
Timeframe: From first documented objective response up to disease progression or relapse or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 6 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab + Fludarabine + CyclophosphamideNA
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine100.00

[back to top]

Response

Response was assessed by the investigator on the basis of clinical, radiological, and pathological (i.e., bone marrow) criteria, using the IWG criteria (Cheson et al 2007). A CR is a complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. A PR is at least a 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses, no increase should be observed in the size of other nodes, liver or spleen, and no new sites of disease should be observed. (NCT01317901)
Timeframe: Day 15 and Day 28 of even-numbered cycles

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable diseaseRelapsed/progressive disease
20 mg/kg of TRU 016 + Bendamustine + Rituximab2400
TRU-016 (10 mg/kg) + Bendamustine + Rituximab3111

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Veliparib When Combined With Bendamustine Hydrochloride

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) reflects the highest dose of Veliparib when combined with Bendamustine Hydrochloride that did not cause a DLT. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the highest dose level at which 33% of patients experienced DLT. (NCT01326702)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionmg (Number)
All Study Participants300

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Using RECIST Version 1.1 (Phase IIa)

Kaplan-Meier estimates will be calculated and log-rank tests will be employed when certain comparisons are needed. Changes in the largest diameter (unidimensional measurement) of the tumor lesions and the shortest diameter in the case of malignant lymph nodes are used in the RECIST criteria. (NCT01326702)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
All Study Participants14.2

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR) to Study Treatment (Phase IIa)

Summary statistics will be used for CR. Responses will be evaluated by the International Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma. (NCT01326702)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Study Participants5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Adverse events assessed by NCI CTCAE version 4.0 (Phase Ib) See adverse events section. (NCT01326702)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dose Level 1-Bendamustine 70 mg/m2, ABT-888 50 mg3
Dose Level 2: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 50 mg3
Dose Level 3: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 100 mg BID4
Dose Level 4: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 150 mg BID2
Dose Level 5: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 200 mg BID2
Dose Level 6: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 300 mg BID5
Dose Level 7: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 400 mg BID3

[back to top]

Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities

(NCT01326702)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dose Level 1-Bendamustine 70 mg/m2, ABT-888 50 mg0
Dose Level 2: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 50 mg0
Dose Level 3: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 100 mg BID1
Dose Level 4: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 150 mg BID0
Dose Level 5: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 200 mg BID0
Dose Level 6: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 300 mg BID1
Dose Level 7: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 400 mg BID2

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Veliparib (Phase Ib)

Area Under the Curve from time zero to 12 hours following Veliparib administration (NCT01326702)
Timeframe: From time zero to 12 hours on day 2 of course 1

Interventionμg*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Dose Level 1-Bendamustine 70 mg/m2, ABT-888 50 mg1.79
Dose Level 2: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 50 mg3.58
Dose Level 3: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 100 mg BID7.93
Dose Level 4: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 150 mg BID12.6
Dose Level 5: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 200 mg BID16.9
Dose Level 6: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 300 mg BID19.0
Dose Level 7: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 400 mg BID25.0

[back to top]

Response Rate

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI and/or CT: Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a Partial Response nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progression of Disease (POD); POD, 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions. (NCT01326702)
Timeframe: 2 years

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgression of Disease
Dose Level 1-Bendamustine 70 mg/m2, ABT-888 50 mg0111
Dose Level 2: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 50 mg0120
Dose Level 3: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 100 mg BID1022
Dose Level 4: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 150 mg BID0020
Dose Level 5: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 200 mg BID0102
Dose Level 6: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 300 mg BID4451
Dose Level 7: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2, ABT-888 400 mg BID0002

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Summary Score (Follicular Lymphoma Population) During Follow Up Phase

The EQ-5D is a quality of life questionnaire with five questions, each with three categories (no problem, moderate problem, severe problems) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (worst possible health state) to 100 (best possible health state. Summary score ranges from 0 to 1. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Maintenance/Observation is indicated as Maint/Obs in data categories. Completion includes completion visit and early termination visit. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Induction: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), Cycle 3 Day 1, End of Induction (up to 7 months); Maintenance: 2, 12 after Day 1 of last induction cycle, Follow-up: every year for up to data cut-off (up to 5 years and 2 months)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change Baseline, Follow-Up Month 36Change Baseline, Follow-Up Month 48
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy0.060.06
Rituximab+Chemotherapy0.050.05

[back to top]

Complete Response (Overall Study Population), Investigator-Assessed

Percentage of participants with complete response in the overall study population was determined on the basis of investigator assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with or without PET. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Without PETWith PET
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy18.461.1
Rituximab+Chemotherapy23.357.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in All Domains of FACT-G (Follicular Lymphoma Population)

FACT-G consists of the following 4 FACT-Lym sub-questionnaires: Physical Well-being (range: 0-28), Social/Family Well-being (range: 0-28), Emotional Well-being (range: 0-24) and Functional Well-being (range: 0-28). Higher scores indicate better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. Maint = Maintenance period. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1, Day 1), data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Physical Well-being (PW), BaselinePW Change, Cycle 3, Day 1PW Change, End InductionPW Change, Maint Month 2PW Change, Maint Month 12PW Change, End MaintSocial/Family Well-being , BaselineS/FW Change, Cycle 3 Day 1S/FW Change, End InductionS/FW Change, Maint Month 2S/FW Change, Maint Month 12S/FW Change, End MaintEmotional Well-being (EW), BaselineEW Change, Cycle 3 Day 1EW Change, End InductionEW Change, Maint Month 2EW Change, Maint Month 12EW Change, End MaintFunctional Well-being (FW), BaselineFW Change, Cycle 3 Day 1FW Change, End InductionFW Change, Maint Month 2FW Change, Maint Month 12FW Change, End Maint
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy23.14-0.210.561.421.341.3323.28-0.67-0.56-0.67-0.97-0.7117.871.351.141.491.461.4918.76-0.070.931.251.651.72
Rituximab+Chemotherapy23.36-0.91-0.060.831.140.8822.84-0.52-0.46-0.39-0.61-0.9317.641.491.161.771.451.4318.66-0.300.441.041.841.40

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Progression-Free Survival in the Follicular Lymphoma Population, Investigator-Assessed

Progression-free survival in participants with follicular lymphoma was defined as the time from randomization until the first documented day of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, on the basis of investigator assessments according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Progression was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or >/=50% increase in any node > 1 centimeter (cm) or >/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion > 1.5 cm or >/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter 1.5 cm. Tumor measurements were obtained by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to final analysis (up to 10 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Rituximab+Chemotherapy40.6
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy34.3

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival in the Follicular Lymphoma Population, Investigator-Assessed

Progression-free survival in participants with follicular lymphoma was defined as the time from randomization until the first documented day of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, on the basis of investigator assessments according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Progression was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or >/=50% increase in any node > 1 centimeter (cm) or >/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion > 1.5 cm or >/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter 1.5 cm. Tumor measurements were obtained by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years and 7 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Rituximab+Chemotherapy24.0
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy16.8

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (Overall Study Population), Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)

Progression-free survival in the overall study population was defined as the time from randomization until the first documented day of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, on the basis of IRC assessments according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Progression was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or >/=50% increase in any node > 1 centimeter (cm) or >/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion > 1.5 cm or >/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter 1.5 cm. Tumor measurements were obtained by CT/MRI. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Rituximab+Chemotherapy24.6
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy18.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab+Chemotherapy99.6
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy99.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Overall Study Population)

Overall survival in the overall study population was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Reported is the percentage of participants with event. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Rituximab+Chemotherapy10.2
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy8.4

[back to top]

Disease-Free Survival (Overall Study Population)

Disease-free survival in the overall study population was defined as the time from the date of the first occurrence of a documented CR to the date of disease progression/ relapse, or death from any cause for the subgroup of participants with a response of CR at any time prior to NALT on the basis of investigator assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Progression/relapse was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or >/=50% increase in any node > 1 centimeter (cm) or >/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion > 1.5 cm or >/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter 1.5 cm. Reported is the percentage of participants with event. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: From first occurrence of documented CR to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Rituximab+Chemotherapy14.9
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy11.2

[back to top]

Overall Response (Overall Study Population), IRC-Assessed

Overall response in the overall study population was defined as percentage of participants with PR or CR determined on the basis of IRC assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with or without PET. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions; PR was defined as >=50% decrease target lesions in up to six dominant lesions identified at baseline, no new lesions and no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, or other nodes. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by >/= 50%; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Without PETWith PET
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy89.987.2
Rituximab+Chemotherapy86.783.3

[back to top]

Overall Response (Overall Study Population), Investigator-Assessed

Overall response in the overall study population was defined as percentage of participants with partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) determined on the basis of investigator assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with or without positron emission tomography (PET). CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions; PR was defined as >=50% decrease target lesions in up to six dominant lesions identified at baseline, no new lesions and no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, or other nodes. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by >/= 50%; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Without PETWith PET
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy87.385.4
Rituximab+Chemotherapy85.781.8

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) (Overall Study Population), Investigator-Assessed

DOR was defined as the time from first occurrence of a documented CR or PR to disease progression/relapse, or death from any cause for participants with a response of CR or PR any time prior to NALT based on RRCML. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as >/=50% decrease target lesions in up to six dominant lesions identified at baseline, no new lesions and no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, or other nodes. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by >/= 50%. Progression/relapse was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or >/=50% increase in any node > 1 centimeter (cm) or >/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion > 1.5 cm or >/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter 1.5 cm. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: From first occurrence of documented CR or PR to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years and 7 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Rituximab+Chemotherapy25.5
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy18.7

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) (Follicular Lymphoma Population), Investigator-Assessed

DOR was defined as the time from first occurrence of a documented CR or PR to disease progression/relapse, or death from any cause for participants with a response of CR or PR any time prior to NALT based on RRCML. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as >/=50% decrease target lesions in up to six dominant lesions identified at baseline, no new lesions and no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, or other nodes. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by >/= 50%. Progression/relapse was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or >/=50% increase in any node > 1 centimeter (cm) or >/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion > 1.5 cm or >/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter 1.5 cm. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: From first occurrence of documented CR or PR to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Rituximab+Chemotherapy39.3
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy33.3

[back to top]

Complete Response (Follicular Lymphoma Population), IRC-Assessed

Percentage of participants with complete response in the follicular lymphoma population was determined on the basis of IRC assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with or without PET. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Without PETWith PET
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy28.571.4
Rituximab+Chemotherapy26.859.7

[back to top]

Disease-Free Survival (Follicular Lymphoma Population)

Disease-free survival in the follicular lymphoma population was defined as the time from the date of the first occurrence of a documented CR to the date of disease progression/ relapse, or death from any cause for the subgroup of participants with a response of CR at any time prior to NALT on the basis of investigator assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (RRCML). Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Progression/relapse was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or >/=50% increase in any node > 1 centimeter (cm) or >/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion > 1.5 cm or >/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter 1.5 cm. Reported is the percentage of participants with event. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: From first occurrence of documented CR to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Rituximab+Chemotherapy27.9
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy26.3

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (Follicular Lymphoma Population)

Event-free survival in the follicular lymphoma population was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date to disease progression/relapse, death from any cause, or initiation of a new anti-lymphoma treatment (NALT) on the basis of investigator assessment assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Disease progression/relapse was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or >/=50% increase in any node > 1 centimeter (cm) or >/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion > 1.5 cm or >/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter 1.5 cm. Tumor measurements were obtained by CT/MRI. Reported is the percentage of participants with an event. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Rituximab+Chemotherapy42.9
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy35.8

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (Overall Study Population)

Event-free survival in the overall study population was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date to disease progression/relapse, death from any cause, or initiation of a new anti-lymphoma treatment (NALT) on the basis of investigator assessment assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Disease progression/relapse was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or >/=50% increase in any node > 1 centimeter (cm) or >/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion > 1.5 cm or >/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter 1.5 cm. Tumor measurements were obtained by CT/MRI. Reported is the percentage of participants with event. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Rituximab+Chemotherapy30.6
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy22.6

[back to top]

Overall Response (Follicular Lymphoma Population), IRC-Assessed

Overall response in the follicular lymphoma population was defined as percentage of participants with PR or complete response CR determined on the basis of IRC assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with or without PET. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions; PR was defined as >=50% decrease target lesions in up to six dominant lesions identified at baseline, no new lesions and no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, or other nodes. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by >/= 50%. Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Without PETWith PET
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy91.388.6
Rituximab+Chemotherapy88.085.2

[back to top]

Overall Response (Follicular Lymphoma Population), Investigator-Assessed

Overall response in the follicular lymphoma population was defined as percentage of participants with PR or complete response CR determined on the basis of investigator assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with and without PET. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions; PR was defined as >=50% decrease target lesions in up to six dominant lesions identified at baseline, no new lesions and no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, or other nodes. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by >/= 50%. Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Without PETWith PET
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy88.285.5
Rituximab+Chemotherapy86.481.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Follicular Lymphoma Population)

Overall survival in the follicular lymphoma population was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Reported is the percentage of participants with event. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 10 years

Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Rituximab+Chemotherapy14.3
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy12.6

[back to top]

Complete Response (Overall Study Population), IRC-Assessed

Percentage of participants with complete response in the overall study population was determined on the basis of IRC assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with or without PET. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)]

,
Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Without PETWith PET
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy27.169.5
Rituximab+Chemotherapy26.359.4

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (Follicular Lymphoma Population), IRC-Assessed

Progression-free survival in the participants with follicular lymphoma was defined as the time from randomization until the first documented day of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, on the basis of IRC assessments according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Progression was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or >/=50% increase in any node > 1 centimeter (cm) or >/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion > 1.5 cm or >/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter 1.5 cm. Tumor measurements were obtained by CT/MRI. In the first 170 patients with follicular lymphoma, an FDG-PET was mandatory where a PET scanner was available. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Rituximab+Chemotherapy23.5
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy18.0

[back to top]

Complete Response (Follicular Lymphoma Population), Investigator-Assessed

Percentage of participants with complete response in the follicular lymphoma population was determined on the basis of investigator assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with or without PET. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Without PETWith PET
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy18.662.0
Rituximab+Chemotherapy24.156.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Total Score (Follicular Population)

The FACT-Lym Total Score for the follicular lymphoma population was derived from the following 5 individual FACT-Lym questionnaire subscale scores: Physical Well-being (range: 0-28), Social/Family Well-being (range: 0-28), Emotional Well-being (range: 0-24),Functional Well-being (range: 0-28) and Lymphoma (range: 0-60). The FACT-Lym Total Score is the sum of all 5 individual subscales (range 0-168). Higher scores indicate better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1, Day 1), data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Total Score, BaselineTotal Score Change, Cycle 3 Day 1Total Score Change, End InductionTotal Score Change, Maint Month 2Total Score Change, Maint Month 12Total Score Change, End Maint
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy128.423.215.108.137.908.80
Rituximab+Chemotherapy127.401.984.188.408.877.43

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival in the Overall Study Population, Investigator-Assessed

Progression-free survival in the overall study population was defined as the time from randomization until the first documented day of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, on the basis of investigator assessments according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Progression was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or >/=50% increase in any node > 1 centimeter (cm) or >/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion > 1.5 cm or >/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter 1.5 cm. Tumor measurements were obtained by CT/MRI. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants with event (Number)
Rituximab+Chemotherapy41.5
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy34.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FACT-Lym Individual Subscale Lymphoma Score (Follicular Population)

The FACT-Lym Individual Subscale Lymphoma Score for the follicular lymphoma population was derived from the Lymphoma subscale questionnaire (range: 0-60). Higher scores indicate better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1, Day 1), data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lymphoma, BaselineLymphoma Change, Cycle 3 Day 1Lymphoma Change, End InductionLymphoma Change, Maint Month 2Lymphoma Change, Maint Month 12Lymphoma Change, End Maint
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy45.542.713.014.524.274.57
Rituximab+Chemotherapy45.012.042.994.804.934.31

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Summary Score (Follicular Lymphoma Population) During Maintenance/Observation Phase

The EQ-5D is a quality of life questionnaire with five questions, each with three categories (no problem, moderate problem, severe problems) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (worst possible health state) to 100 (best possible health state. Summary score ranges from 0 to 1 Higher scores indicate better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Maintenance/Observation is indicated as Maint/Obs. Completion includes completion visit and early termination visit. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Induction: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), Cycle 3 Day 1, End of Induction (up to 7 months); Maintenance: 2, 12 months after Day 1 of last induction cycle, Follow-up: every year up to data cut-off (up to 5 years and 2 months)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change Baseline, Maint/Obs Month 2Change Baseline, Maint/Obs Month 12Change Baseline, Maint/Obs Completion
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy0.040.060.05
Rituximab+Chemotherapy0.040.060.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Summary Score (Follicular Lymphoma Population) During Induction Phase

The EQ-5D is a quality of life questionnaire with five questions, each with three categories (no problem, moderate problem, severe problems) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (worst possible health state) to 100 (best possible health state. Summary score ranges from 0 to 1. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Completion (Compl) includes completion visit and early termination visit. Maintenance/Observation is indicated as Maint/Obs. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Induction: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), Cycle 3 Day 1, End of Induction (up to 7 months); Maintenance: 2, 12 months after Day 1 of last induction cycle, Follow-up: every year up to data cut-off (up to 5 years and 2 months)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline InductionChange Baseline, Cycle 3 Day 1Change Baseline, Induction ComplChange Baseline, Maint/Obs Month 2Change from Baseline, Maint/Obs Month 12Change Baseline, Maint/Obs Completion
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy0.810.030.030.06-0.20-0.10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Summary Score (Follicular Lymphoma Population) During Induction Phase

The EQ-5D is a quality of life questionnaire with five questions, each with three categories (no problem, moderate problem, severe problems) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (worst possible health state) to 100 (best possible health state. Summary score ranges from 0 to 1. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Completion (Compl) includes completion visit and early termination visit. Maintenance/Observation is indicated as Maint/Obs. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Induction: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), Cycle 3 Day 1, End of Induction (up to 7 months); Maintenance: 2, 12 months after Day 1 of last induction cycle, Follow-up: every year up to data cut-off (up to 5 years and 2 months)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline InductionChange Baseline, Cycle 3 Day 1Change Baseline, Induction ComplChange Baseline, Maint/Obs Month 2Change from Baseline, Maint/Obs Month 12
Rituximab+Chemotherapy0.800.030.040.050.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FACT-Lym Total Outcome Index (TOI) Score (Follicular Lymphoma Population)

The FACT-Lym TOI Score for the follicular lymphoma population was derived from the following 3 individual FACT-Lym questionnaire subscale scores: Physical Well-being (range: 0-28), Functional Well-being (range: 0-28) and Lymphoma (range: 0-60). The FACT-Lym TOI Score is the sum of the 3 individual subscales (range 0-116). Higher scores indicate better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. (NCT01332968)
Timeframe: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1, Day 1), data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
TOI Score, BaselineTOI Score Change, Cycle 3 Day 1TOI Score Change, End InductionTOI Score Change, Maint M2TOI Score Change, Maint M12TOI Score Change, End Maint
Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy86.942.184.577.177.207.44
Rituximab+Chemotherapy86.610.462.916.227.616.23

[back to top]

Number of Phase I Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicity Events (Phase I)

The Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) is defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least one-third of patients graded according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Dose-limiting toxicities include non-hematologic events graded 3 or higher and deemed at least possibly related to treatment. A total of 6 patients treated at the MTD will be sufficient to identify common toxicities at the MTD.The number of patients reporting a dose-limiting event are reported. (NCT01369849)
Timeframe: Up to 35 days

InterventionPatients reporting Dose-Limiting Events (Number)
Phase I: Dose Level 11
Phase I: Dose Level 22

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

The Overall response rate is estimated by the total number of complete or partial responses (CR, CRi, CCR, nPR, or PR) divided by the total number of evaluate patients. Complete and partial responses were scored using the NCI Working Group criteria. A Complete Response (CR, CRi, and CCR) is characterized by an absence of lymphadenopathy, heptomegaly and splenomegaly with or without normalized blood counts and bone marrow assessment . A PR is defined as having >50% decrease in lymphocyte count and reduction in sum of the products of measured nodes and an improvement in blood counts. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true overall response rate will be calculated. (NCT01369849)
Timeframe: 3 months post-treatment

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
All Patients0.92

[back to top]

Proportion of Complete Response Defined to be a CR or CRi Noted as the Objective Status (Phase II)

"A Complete Response (CR) is defined by the NCI Working Group criteria and requires all of the following for a period of at least 2 months:~Absence of lymphadenopathy (e.g. lymph nodes >1.5 cm) by physical examination.~No hepatomegaly or splenomegaly by physical examination.~Absence of constitutional symptoms.~Neutrophils ≥1500/ul.~Platelets >100,000/ul (untransfused).~Hemoglobin >11.0 gm/dl (untransfused)~Peripheral blood lymphocytes <4000/uL~Patients who fulfill all criteria for a CR but who have a persistent anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia related to drug toxicity rather than residual CLL will be classified as CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi).~The proportion of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated according to the approach of Duffy and Santner." (NCT01369849)
Timeframe: From registration to response, up to 84 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose Level 150

[back to top]

Treatment-free Survival

Treatment free survival is defined to be the time from registration to the date of initation of subsequent therapy or death. The distribution of treatment free survival will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT01369849)
Timeframe: Time from registration to the date of initiation of subsequent therapy or death, median follow-up time is 37 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
All Patients24.5

[back to top]

Biomarker Analysis (CD38, CD49d, and ZAP-70)

CD38, CD49d, and ZAP-70 status will be evaluated pre-treatment. These factors will be summarized and used to help characterize the types of patients accrued to this trial. (NCT01369849)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CD3872587790CD3872587791CD3872587792CD49d72587790CD49d72587791CD49d72587792ZAP-7072587790ZAP-7072587792ZAP-7072587791
Not DonePositiveNegative
Phase I: Dose Level 12
Phase II3
Phase I: Dose Level 11
Phase I: Dose Level 23
Phase II0
Phase I: Dose Level 14
Phase I: Dose Level 16
Phase I: Dose Level 21
Phase I: Dose Level 10
Phase I: Dose Level 22
Phase II1
Phase I: Dose Level 20
Phase II2

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined for all evaluable patients who have achieved a clinical response as the date at which the patient's objective status is first noted to be a CR, CRi, CCR, nPR, or PR to the earliest date progression is documented. The distribution of duration of response will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT01369849)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 39 months and maximum follow-up of 54 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
All PatientsNA

[back to top]

Minimal-residual Disease

Minimal residual disease (MRD) will be evaluated after treatment in patients who achieve a complete clinical response. Flow cytometry will be used to detect approximately 1 CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes following induction. A score of positive means CLL cells were found and a negative score means no CLL cells were found. The number of patients with an MRD negative score are reported here. (NCT01369849)
Timeframe: Cycle 6 assessment (maximum of 231 days post-registration)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Patients2

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival (OS)

Measured from date of registration to date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and are censored at date of last contact. (NCT01412879)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 1: R-HCVAD/MTX/Ara-C (Induction Therapy)81
Arm 2: R-Bendamustine (Induction Therapy)79

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 2 Years

Disease progression is defined using the 2007 revised Cheson et al. criteria that is at least 50% increase in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of target measurable nodal lesions over the smallest sum observed, or >= 50% increase in greatest transverse diameter (GTD) of any nodal > 1 cm in shortest axis, or >= 50% increase in the SPD of other target measurable lesions over the smallest sum observed, any new bone marrow involvement, any new lesion, lymph node with long axis is > 1.5 cm or if both long and short axes are > 1 cm, PET positive if patients with no pretreatment PET scan or when PET scan was positive before therapy. Progression-free survival is measured from date of registration to date of first observation of progressive disease, or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and progression-free are censored at date of last contact. (NCT01412879)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 1: R-HCVAD/MTX/Ara-C (Induction Therapy)82
Arm 2: R-Bendamustine (Induction Therapy)81

[back to top]

Response Rate (Complete and Partial Response)

Complete Response (CR) is a complete disappearance of all disease with the exception of the following. If no PET scan or when the PET scan was positive before therapy, a post-treatment residual mass of any size is permitted if it is PET negative. If the PET scan was negative before therapy, all nodal masses at baseline must have regressed. No new lesions. Previously enlarged organs must have regressed and not be palpable. Bone marrow (BM) must be negative if positive at baseline. Normalization of markers. Partial Response (PR) is a 50% decrease in the sum of products of greatest diameters (SPD) for up to 6 identified dominant lesions, including spleenic and hepatic nodules from baseline. No new lesions and no increase in the size of liver, spleen or other nodes. If PET scan or when the PET scan was positive before therapy, PET should be positive in at least one previously involved site. (NCT01412879)
Timeframe: Up to 9 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 1: R-HCVAD/MTX/Ara-C (Induction Therapy)94.1
Arm 2: R-Bendamustine (Induction Therapy)82.9

[back to top] [back to top]

Median Duration of Response of This Regimen

Duration of response is the time from response (CR or PR) until progression of disease or relapse. Responses and progression were evaluated based on the criteria published by the International Myeloma Working Group (Durie, et al, 2006). (NCT01438177)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Velcade+Cyclophosphamide+Chloroquine4.4

[back to top]

Response Rate (CR + PR After 2 Cycles)

"Response rate is defined as the percentage of patients who have a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Responses were assessed every two cycles of treatment, based on the criteria published by the International Myeloma Working Group (Durie, et al, 2006). Per International Myeloma Working Group response criteria:~CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow PR: > 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by >90% or to < 200 mg/24 h" (NCT01438177)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade+Cyclophosphamide+Chloroquine30

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Grade 3 or Higher

Adverse events reported here were at least possibly related to the protocol therapy. (NCT01438177)
Timeframe: Treatment period plus 30 days post-treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
FatigueHemoglobinNasal cavity/paranasal reactionsANC/AGCPain: pleuralPlatelets
Velcade+Cyclophosphamide+Chloroquine211415

[back to top]

Overall Safety and Tolerability of the Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide

"To define safety and tolerability of the combination of ofatumumab, bendamustine, carboplatin and etoposide as measured by the number of dose modifications made to Bendamustine..~Determined through dose modifications for bendamustine according to patient's toxicity levels:~Initial 120 mg/m2 dose decreased to 90 mg/m2~Initial 90 mg/m2 dose decreased to 70 mg/m2~Initial 70 mg/m2 dose decreased to 50 mg/m2~Initial 50 mg/m2 dose decreased to Withdrawn from study" (NCT01458366)
Timeframe: After each cycle (after approximately 3 days, 25 days, and 50 days)

Interventiondose modifications (Number)
Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (BOCE)0

[back to top]

Overall Proportion of Patients Who Are Able to Undergo Stem Cell Transplant (SCT)

To determine the proportion of patients who are able to undergo stem cell transplant among transplant-eligible patients. Patients can receive SCT after Cycle 2. (NCT01458366)
Timeframe: At 2 years after completion of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (BOCE)12

[back to top]

Overall Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR) Rate

"Based on the revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma [Cheson 2007]~CR= complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease related symptoms if present before therapy PR= >/= 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen;" (NCT01458366)
Timeframe: CT and PET scans after Cycle 2 (approximately 25 days) and 3-8 weeks post-treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 272275434Phase 172275434
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseNo response
Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (BOCE)12
Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (BOCE)4
Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (BOCE)8
Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (BOCE)5
Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (BOCE)3

[back to top]

Overall Progression-Free Survival

To determine 1 and 2 year progression-free survival [Cheson 2007] CR= complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease related symptoms if present before therapy PR= >/= 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen; (NCT01458366)
Timeframe: At 1 and 2 years after completion of treatment; year 2 reported

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (BOCE)5.1

[back to top]

Overall Frequency of Response With Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide at Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

To determine the overall frequency of response with combination bendamustine, ofatumumab, carboplatin, and etoposide for refractory or relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Overall response is determined as cumulative Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR). (NCT01458366)
Timeframe: At 25 days and 3-8 weeks post-treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (BOCE)20

[back to top]

Total Overall Survival for Transplant vs Non-transplant

1 and 2 year overall survival for those who received Stem Cell Transplant (SCT) versus those who did not receive SCT (NCT01458366)
Timeframe: At 1 and 2 years after completion of treatment; year 2 reported

Interventionmonths (Median)
Did not receive transplantReceived transplant
Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (BOCE)7.427.3

[back to top]

Phase I: Overall Frequency of Response

"To determine the overall frequency of response--overall response will include all subjects with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). Based on the revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma [Cheson 2007]~CR= complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease related symptoms if present before therapy PR= >/= 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen;" (NCT01458366)
Timeframe: CT and PET scans after Cycle 2 (approximately 25 days) and 3-8 weeks post-treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (BOCE)7

[back to top]

Phase I: Maximum-Tolerated Dose of Bendamustine in Combination With Ofatumumab, Carboplatin and Etoposide (BOCE)

To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of bendamustine in combination with ofatumumab, carboplatin and etoposide for patients with refractory or relapsed aggressive B cell lymphomas. Toxicity levels will be assessed after every cycle until a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is found. Toxicities will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE version 4.0). DLT will be defined as any grade 4 infection, or grade >/= 3 non-hematologic toxicity that persists for 7 days or more. (NCT01458366)
Timeframe: Baseline through 50 days

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (BOCE)120

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Developed Detectable Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)

A participant was considered ADA-positive across the study if they had a positive reading at any time point during the study. (NCT01466153)
Timeframe: From treatment administration (Day 1) until disease progression, death, initiation of alternative therapy, withdrawal of consent, or end of study (up to 24 months)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
MEDI-551 2 mg/kg + Bendamustine4
MEDI-551 4 mg/kg + Bendamustine8

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

ORR, defined as the proportion of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) out of total number of participants. Responses were assessed by using National Cancer Institute - Working Group guidelines on CLL. (NCT01466153)
Timeframe: From treatment administration (Day 1) until disease progression, death, initiation of alternative therapy, withdrawal of consent, or end of study (up to 24 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Rituximab + Bendamustine59.7
MEDI-551 2 mg/kg + Bendamustine52.8
MEDI-551 4 mg/kg + Bendamustine63.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was determined as the time from the start of treatment with study drug until death due to any cause. For participants who were alive at the end of the study or lost to follow-up, OS was censored on the last date when the participant was known be alive. Kaplan-Meier method was used for evaluation. (NCT01466153)
Timeframe: From treatment administration (Day 1) until disease progression, death, initiation of alternative therapy, withdrawal of consent, or end of study (up to 24 months)

InterventionMonths (Number)
Rituximab + BendamustineNA
MEDI-551 2 mg/kg + BendamustineNA
MEDI-551 4 mg/kg + BendamustineNA

[back to top]

Terminal Half Life (t1/2) of MEDI-551

Terminal phase elimination half-life (T1/2) was the time required for half of the drug to be eliminated from the serum. (NCT01466153)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion and 1 hour post infusion on Days 2 and 8, Days 15 and 22 of cycle 1

InterventionDay (Mean)
MEDI-551 2 mg/kg + Bendamustine17.2
MEDI-551 4 mg/kg + Bendamustine22.0

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time from onset of treatment with study drug until first evidence/diagnosis of progressive disease or - in the absence of any diagnosis of progressive disease - until the participant´s death. (NCT01466153)
Timeframe: From treatment administration (Day 1) until disease progression, death, initiation of alternative therapy, withdrawal of consent, or end of study (up to 24 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Rituximab + Bendamustine15.4
MEDI-551 2 mg/kg + Bendamustine15.0
MEDI-551 4 mg/kg + Bendamustine16.1

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01466153)
Timeframe: From treatment administration (Day 1) until disease progression, death, initiation of alternative therapy, withdrawal of consent, or end of study (up to 24 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Rituximab + Bendamustine2.1
MEDI-551 2 mg/kg + Bendamustine1.9
MEDI-551 4 mg/kg + Bendamustine2.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as AEs

An abnormal laboratory finding which required an action or intervention by the investigator, or a finding judged by the investigator to represent a change beyond the range of normal physiologic fluctuation were reported as an adverse event. Laboratory evaluations (haematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis) of blood and urine samples were performed. (NCT01466153)
Timeframe: From time of consent to 90 days post last dose

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
HyperbilirubinaemiaHypercalcaemiaHypercholesterolaemiaHyperglycaemiaHyperkalaemiaHyperlipidaemiaHypermagnesaemiaHyperphosphataemiaHypertriglyceridaemiaHyperuricaemiaHypoalbuminaemiaHypocalcaemiaHypokalaemiaHypomagnesaemiaHyponatraemiaAlanine Aminotransferase IncreasedAspartate Aminotransferase IncreasedBlood Alkaline Phosphatase IncreasedBlood Bilirubin IncreasedBlood Cholesterol DecreasedBlood Creatinine DecreasedBlood Creatinine IncreasedBlood Immunoglobulin G DecreasedBlood Lactate Dehydrogenase IncreasedBlood Urea IncreasedGamma-Glutamyltransferase IncreasedHepatic enzyme IncreasedAnaemiaEosinophiliaLymphopeniaNeutropeniaThromobocytopeniaActivated Partial Thromboplastin Time ProlongedBlood Fibrinogen IncreasedHaemoglobin DecreasedLymphocyte Count DecreasedNeutrophil Count DecreasedPlatelet Count DecreasedProthrombin Time ShortenedHaematuriaProteinuriaWhite Blood Cells in Urine
MEDI-551 2 mg/kg + Bendamustine20021101050112100110020011070310600010120210
MEDI-551 4 mg/kg + Bendamustine101120010221410332110110020911191000102330101

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

Complete response was as per IWG was the complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. (NCT01466153)
Timeframe: From treatment administration (Day 1) until disease progression, death, initiation of alternative therapy, withdrawal of consent, or end of study (up to 24 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Rituximab + Bendamustine6.5
MEDI-551 2 mg/kg + Bendamustine5.6
MEDI-551 4 mg/kg + Bendamustine11.5

[back to top]

Minimal Residual Disease Negative Complete Response (CR) Rate

The MRD-negative CR rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR and became MRD-negative as determined by flow cytometry. CR as per International Working Group (IWG) was complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. (NCT01466153)
Timeframe: From treatment administration (Day 1) until disease progression, death, initiation of alternative therapy, withdrawal of consent, or end of study (up to 24 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Rituximab + Bendamustine1.6
MEDI-551 2 mg/kg + Bendamustine5.6
MEDI-551 4 mg/kg + Bendamustine4.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as AEs

An abnormal laboratory finding which required an action or intervention by the investigator, or a finding judged by the investigator to represent a change beyond the range of normal physiologic fluctuation were reported as an adverse event. Laboratory evaluations (haematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis) of blood and urine samples were performed. (NCT01466153)
Timeframe: From time of consent to 90 days post last dose

InterventionParticipants (Number)
HyperbilirubinaemiaHypercalcaemiaHypercholesterolaemiaHyperglycaemiaHyperkalaemiaHyperlipidaemiaHypermagnesaemiaHyperphosphataemiaHypertriglyceridaemiaHyperuricaemiaHypoalbuminaemiaHypocalcaemiaHypokalaemiaHypomagnesaemiaHyponatraemiaAlanine Aminotransferase IncreasedAspartate Aminotransferase IncreasedBlood Alkaline Phosphatase IncreasedBlood Bilirubin IncreasedBlood Cholesterol DecreasedBlood Creatinine DecreasedBlood Creatinine IncreasedBlood Lactate Dehydrogenase IncreasedBlood Urea IncreasedGamma-Glutamyltransferase IncreasedHepatic enzyme IncreasedAnaemiaEosinophiliaLymphopeniaNeutropeniaThromobocytopeniaActivated Partial Thromboplastin Time ProlongedBlood Fibrinogen IncreasedBlood Immunoglobulin g DecreasedHaemoglobin DecreasedLymphocyte Count DecreasedNeutrophil Count DecreasedPlatelet Count DecreasedProthrombin Time ShortenedHaematuriaProteinuriaWhite Blood Cells in Urine
Rituximab + Bendamustine0114201013236221110011041111804281221003921000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram Reported as AEs

AEs observed in participants with clinically significant ECG abnormalities were assessed. (NCT01466153)
Timeframe: From time of consent to 90 days post last dose

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Atrial FibrillationAtrioventricular BlockPalpitationsSinus BradycardiaSinus TachycardiaTachycardiaPyrexiaDyspnoeaDyspnoea ExertionalHypertensionHypotensionOrthostatic Hypotension
MEDI-551 2 mg/kg + Bendamustine2000011121020
MEDI-551 4 mg/kg + Bendamustine1020011440161
Rituximab + Bendamustine1101122093150

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug (MEDI-551). A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between administration of study drug and Day 90 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. An AESIs was one of scientific and medical interest specific to understanding of study product and may have required close monitoring and rapid communication by investigator to the sponsor. Treatment emergent AESIs were collected from the time of dosing through Day 90 after the last dose of study drug.Hepatic function abnormality and infusion reactions resulting in discontinuation were considered as AESIs. (NCT01466153)
Timeframe: From time of consent to 90 days post last dose

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
TEAEsTESAEsAESIs
MEDI-551 2 mg/kg + Bendamustine33164
MEDI-551 4 mg/kg + Bendamustine57196
Rituximab + Bendamustine58192

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was measured from the start of treatment with study drug until the first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Kaplan-Meier method was used for evaluation. (NCT01466153)
Timeframe: From treatment administration (Day 1) until disease progression, death, initiation of alternative therapy, withdrawal of consent, or end of study (up to 24 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Rituximab + Bendamustine14.8
MEDI-551 2 mg/kg + Bendamustine15.0
MEDI-551 4 mg/kg + Bendamustine16.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Percentage of participants alive at 3 years. (NCT01490723)
Timeframe: From date of treatment to date of relapse or death, up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Yttrium-90 Ibritumomab + Chemo14

[back to top]

Toxicity

Dose limiting toxicities plus % of patients with a clinically significant change in left ventricular ejection fraction. (NCT01491841)
Timeframe: 30 days post last dose of study drug

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose-Limiting ToxicityLeft Ventricular Ejection FractionOther Adverse Events
Phase 1: Pixantrone, 115mg/m^2106
Phase 1: Pixantrone, 55mg/m^2116
Phase 1: Pixantrone, 85mg/m^2106

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

(NCT01491841)
Timeframe: From day 1 of treatment to disease progression, death or 5 years, whichever comes first

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine + Rituximab + Pixantrone + Pegfilgrastim3.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT01491841)
Timeframe: from day 1 of treatment to death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine + Rituximab + Pixantrone + Pegfilgrastim7.9

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose

Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) assessments were performed weekly during cycles 1 and 2. A DLT was defined as any grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity that lasted longer than 48 hours, despite proper supportive care, any grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity, or any grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity lasting longer than 7 days. Alopecia and febrile neutropenia were not considered DLTs. Any NCI CTC (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria) v4.03 grade 5 (death) toxicity was considered a DLT. Dose Limiting Toxicities were used as the assessment criteria to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD). MTD is presented. (NCT01491841)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionmilligrams per meter squared (Number)
Bendamustine + Rituximab + Pixantrone + Pegfilgrastim115

[back to top]

Overall Response

"Partial response and complete response evaluated using a modified version of the revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma by Cheson et al~Complete Response (CR) • Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.~Complete Response Unconfirmed (CRu) meets the CR criteria, but with one or more of the following:~A residual node > 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that has regressed >75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes that were previously confluent must have regressed >75% in their SPD compared with the size of the original mass.~Indeterminate bone marrow (increased number or size of aggregates without cytologic or architectural atypia by immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry).~Partial Response (PR)~• A decrease of ≥ 50% in the SPD of up to six of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses." (NCT01491841)
Timeframe: up to 220 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pixantrone, 55mg/m^22
Pixantrone, 85mg/m^22
Pixantrone, 115mg/m^25

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events

(NCT01500083)
Timeframe: Up to 266 days

Interventionnumber of adverse events (Number)
Patients With Previously Untreated CLL298
Patients With iNHL302

[back to top]

Investigator-assessed Kaplan-meier Estimates of Time to Response

Time to response is defined as time from date of the first administration of study treatment to the first response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR). Response was determined according to the IWCLL updated NCI-WG guidelines 2008. CR: all of the following criteria at least 2 months after last treatment: no lymphadenopathy (Ly)/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11.0 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/ thrombocytopenia/ neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. nPR: persistent nodules BM. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11.0 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL, LC <4000/µL. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment to the first response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) (up to 3 Month Follow-up (F/U) visit)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^20.95
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^21.08

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA) Disease

"AIHA is a disease where the body's immune system fails to recognize red blood cells as self and begins destroying these red blood cells. The number of participants diagnosed with AIHA are presented." (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (if the event is considered as an AE), or up to 3 years after the last dose of study treatment or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy, if considered a SAE

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^20
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^21

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event of Infection

Participants with the indicated Grade 3 or Grade 4 adverse event of infection are presented. AEs were graded according to the NCI CTCAE grade, version 4.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death). (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (if the event is considered as an AE), or up to 3 years after the last dose of study treatment or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy, if considered a SAE

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^25
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^210

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD5-CD19+ Cell Counts up to 36 Months

CD5-CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline CD5- CD19+ cell count value is the last pre-dose assessment values performed on cycle 1 Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-Month Follow-up to 36-Month Follow-up (in 3 months interval)

,
InterventionCell per microliter (Mean)
3 month F/U - Baseline (n= 32, 31)6 month F/U - Baseline (n= 30, 28)9 month F/U - Baseline (n= 37, 23)12 month F/U - Baseline (n= 32, 23)15 month F/U - Baseline (n= 29, 21)18 month F/U - Baseline (n= 23, 11)21 month F/U - Baseline (n= 17, 8)24 month F/U - Baseline (n= 15, 7)27 month F/U - Baseline (n= 19, 6)30 month F/U - Baseline (n= 15, 6)33 month F/U - Baseline (n= 10, 3)36 month F/U - Baseline (n= 8, 4)
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^2-2052.4-3822.8-2288.4-4656.3-4256.2-5043.6-275.1-224.0-3870.5-3964.3-206.0-5693.0
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2-5800.8-3921.1-5969.7-6756.8-5323.6-4677.9-5224.2-4522.7-7259.0-7673.6-9511.2-8430.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) CD5+CD19+ Cell Counts up to 36 Months

CD5+ CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline CD5+ CD19+ cell count value is the last pre-dose assessment values performed on cycle 1 Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-Month Follow-up to 36-Month Follow-up (in 3 months interval)

,
InterventionCell per microliter (Mean)
3 month F/U - Baseline (n=32, 31)6 month F/U - Baseline (n=30,28)9 month F/U - Baseline (n=37,23)12 month F/U - Baseline (n=32,23)15 month F/U - Baseline (n=29,21)18 month F/U - Baseline (n=23,11)21 month F/U - Baseline (n=17,8)24 month F/U - Baseline (n=15,7)27 month F/U - Baseline (n=19, 6)30 month F/U - Baseline (n=15, 6)33 month F/U - Baseline (n=10, 3)36 month F/U - Baseline (n=8, 4)
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^2-40644.2-45630.4-49527.3-43994.3-39985.6-31229.5-52665.1-37969.3-24824.8-30938.0-38216.3-30961.0
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2-72622.5-61258.2-76688.7-77884.8-80997.6-85837.7-82180.6-92850.6-82553.4-96903.7-65321.8-52087.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies to End of Study Treatment

Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured in the blood samples of the participants. Baseline IgA, IgG, and IgM values are the last pre-dose assessment values performed on cycle 1 Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: Baseline and end of study treatment (up to 30 months)

,
InterventionGram per liter (Mean)
IgAIgGIgM
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^20.0540-1.246-0.0463
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^20.0768-0.714-0.0490

[back to top]

Maximum Decrease in Sum of the Product of the Diameter (SPD) From Baseline in Participants With Lymphadenopathy at Baseline

Lymph nodes were evaluated by physical examination which involved recording the diameter in two planes (sum of the product of the diameter [SPD]) of the largest palpable node in each of the following sites: cervical, axillary, supraclavicular, inguinal and femoral. Lymphadenopathy is defined as lymph nodes with the largest diameter greater than 1.5 centimeters. The maximum reduction in SPD from Baseline at C2D1, C3D1, C4D1, C5D1, C6D1, 3-Month F/U, 6-Month F/U and 9-Month F/U are provided. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1), Cycle 3 Day 1 (C3D1), Cycle 4 Day 1 (C4D1), Cycle 5 Day 1 (C5D1), Cycle 6 Day 1 (C6D1), 3-Month Follow-Up (F/U), 6-Month F/U and 9-Month F/U

,
Interventioncm^2 (centimeters squared) (Mean)
C2D1, n=34, 35C3D1, n=32, 35C4D1, n=32, 35C5D1, n=29, 35C6D1, n=30, 333-Month F/U, n=33, 326-Month F/U, n=3, 19-Month F/U, n=1, 0
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^2-77.3-90.9-94.6-96.2-97.0-95.9-100.0NA
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2-83.5-92.1-99.1-99.6-99.6-99.2-100.0-68.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study

Participants who received no transfusion and at least one transfusion during the study are presented. Participants who took any blood products are counted in this table. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until earliest date of disease progression or death (up to 3 years after the last dose of study treatment)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
No transfusionsAt least one transfusion
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^23320
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2386

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Were Negative or Positive for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) and Achieved a Bone Marrow Biopsy Confirmed Complete Response (CR) up to 36-Month Follow-up

MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the partcipants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. Analysis of CD5+ CD19+ was performed on the bone marrow aspirate sample obtained no sooner than 2 months following the last dose of study treatment. MRD results were reported as negative or positive. The absence of MRD (negative MRD) is defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: 3 month follow up to the 36 Month Follow-up (in 3 month interval)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
3 month F/U, MRD Positive (n=16 , 4)3 month F/U, MRD Negative (n=16 , 4)6 month F/U, MRD Positive (n=8 , 2)6 month F/U, MRD Negative (n=8 , 2)9 month F/U, MRD Positive (n=11 , 2)9 month F/U, MRD Negative (n=11 , 2)12 month F/U, MRD Positive (n=9 , 2)12 month F/U, MRD Negative (n=9 , 2)15 month F/U, MRD Positive (n=9 , 2)15 month F/U, MRD Negative (n=9 , 2)18 month F/U, MRD Positive (n=6 , 1)18 month F/U, MRD Negative (n=6 , 1)21 month F/U, MRD Positive (n=7, 1)21 month F/U, MRD Negative (n=7 , 1)24 month F/U, MRD Positive (n=6 , 1)24 month F/U, MRD Negative (n=6 , 1)27 month F/U, MRD Positive (n=3 , 1)27 month F/U, MRD Negative (n=3 , 1)30 month F/U, MRD Positive (n=4 , 1)30 month F/U, MRD Negative (n=4 , 1)33 month F/U, MRD Positive (n=4 , 1)33 month F/U, MRD Negative (n=4 , 1)36 month F/U, MRD Positive (n=2 , 1)36 month F/U, MRD Negative (n=2 , 1)
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^2401111111101010101010101
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2791738183615250603131302

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Adverse Event of Any Infusion Reactions (IR) or Serious Infusion Reactions (SIR)

An Infusion reaction is defined as events occurring after the beginning of an infusion of ofatumumab or within 24 hours following the end of an infusion of bendamustine. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (up to 24 hours after last dose of study treatment)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any ofatumumab only IRAny ofatumumab only SIRAny ofatumumab plus bendamustine IRAny ofatumumab plus bendamustine SIR
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^2344354
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2303304

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (if the event is considered as an AE), or up to 3 years after the last dose of study treatment or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy, if considered a SAE

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAny SAE
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^25025
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^24320

[back to top]

Investigator-assessed of Kaplan-meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of the first administration of study treatment and the earlier of the date of disease progression (PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following:new lesion or increase by >=50% from BL in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen, PL >= 50% decrease from BL, or to <100,000/uL secondary to CLL, Hb decrease of >2 g/dL from BL or to <10 g/dL secondary to CLL, CLL- transformation. Response was determined according to the IWCLL updated NCI-WG guidelines 2008. Participants who have neither progressed or died at the time of analysis were censored at the date of the last adequate assessment. If there was more than 1 scheduled visit missed, PFS is censored at the last adequate assessment of response. An adequate assessment is defined as an assessment where the investigator determined a response of CR, CRi, nPR, PR, or stable disease (SD). (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment until earliest date of disease progression or death (up to 3 years after the last dose of study treatment)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^236.07
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^222.54

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Response (CR) With and Without a CT Scan Assessment After the Last Dose of Study Treatment, as Assessed by the Investigator

Response was determined according to the IWCLL updated NCI-WG guidelines 2008. CR requires all of the following criteria at least 2 months after the last treatment: no lymphadenopathy (Ly)/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500/µL, platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11.0 g/dL, lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment until 3 months after the last dose of study treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
CR without CT scan assessmentCR with CT scan assessment
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^265
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^21912

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)

The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the participant, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. Grade 0, fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. Grade 1, restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. Grade 2, ambulatory and capable of all selfcare, but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 3, capable of only limited selfcare; confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 4, completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair. Grade 5, dead. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: Baseline (BL), Cycle 3 Day 1 (C3D1), Cycle 6 Day 1 (C6D1), 12, 24 and 36 month follow up (F/U)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
BL, Score of 0, n=44, 53BL, Score of 1, n=44, 53BL, Score of 2, n=44, 53BL, Score of 3, n=44, 53BL, Score of 4-5, n=44, 53C3D1, Score of 0, n=42, 48C3D1, Score of 1, n=42, 48C3D1, Score of 2, n=42, 48C3D1, Score of 3, n=42, 48C3D1, Score of 4-5, n=42, 48C6D1, Score of 0, n=38, 47C6D1, Score of 1, n=38, 47C6D1, Score of 2, n=38, 47C6D1, Score of 3, n=38, 47C6D1, Score of 4-5, n=38, 4712 Month F/U, Score of 0, n=39, 2812 Month F/U, Score of 1, n=39, 2812 Month F/U, Score of 2, n=39, 2812 Month F/U, Score of 3, n=39, 2812 Month F/U, Score of 4-5, n=39, 2824 Month F/U, Score of 0, n=28, 1624 Month F/U, Score of 1, n=28, 1624 Month F/U, Score of 2, n=28, 1624 Month F/U, Score of 3, n=28, 1624 Month F/U, Score of 4-5, n=28, 1636 Month F/U, Score of 0, n=21, 936 Month F/U, Score of 1, n=21, 936 Month F/U, Score of 2, n=21, 936 Month F/U, Score of 3, n=21, 936 Month F/U, Score of 4-5, n=21, 9
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^223291002721000271910019810013300081000
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^216280001725000191900024141001611100155100

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Zeta-chain-associated Protein Kinase (ZAP) 70 Testing at Baseline Who Also Had a Clinical Response After Last Dose of Study Treatment

ZAP-70 is a protein normally expressed near the surface membrane of T cells and natural killer cells. ZAP-70 in B cells is used as a prognostic marker in identifying different forms of CLL. Participants with ZAP-70 testing results intermediate (Int), positive (Pos) and negative (Neg) at Baseline and who had a clinical response after last dose of study treatment are provided. Clinical responses included complete remission (CR), complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi), nodular partial remission (nPR), partial remission (PR), disease progression (PD), and stable disease (SD). The participants with a PR, CRi, PR or nPR are called responders and the participants with SD and PD are called non-responders. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment until earliest date of disease progression or death (up to 3 months following last dose of study treatment)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ZAP-70, Int, CR, n=6, 6ZAP-70, Int, CRi, n=6, 6ZAP-70, Int, nPR, n=6, 6ZAP-70, Int, PR, n=6, 6ZAP-70, Int, PD, n=6, 6ZAP-70, Int, SD, n=6, 6ZAP-70, Neg, CR, n=2, 2ZAP-70, Neg, CRi, n=2, 2ZAP-70, Neg, nPR, n=2, 2ZAP-70, Neg, PR, n=2, 2ZAP-70, Neg, PD, n=2, 2ZAP-70, Neg, SD, n=2, 2ZAP-70, Pos, CR, n=36, 44ZAP-70, Pos, CRi, n=36, 44ZAP-70, Pos, nPR, n=36, 44ZAP-70, Pos, PR, n=36, 44ZAP-70, Pos, PD, n=36, 44ZAP-70, Pos, SD, n=36, 44
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^21003100002005281775
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^210030110010017351100

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Reduction in Organomegaly (Spleen and Liver)

Organomegaly is the abnormal enlargement of organs. Physical examination of the liver (L) and spleen (S) were done at Screening (SCR), C3D1, C6D1, 12-Month F/U, 24-Month F/U and 36-Month F/U. The result of the physical examination of the liver (L) and spleen (S) was presented as normal (NOR), enlarged (EL) and not assessed (NOA). (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: Screening (Scr), Cycle 3 Day 1 (C3D1), Cycle 6 Day 1 (C6D1), 12, 24 and 36 -Month Follow-Up (F/U)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
SCR, S, NOR, n=44, 50SCR, S, EL, n=44, 50SCR, S, NOA, n=44, 50SCR, L, NOR, n=44, 51SCR, L, EL, n=44, 51SCR, L, NOA, n=44, 51C3D1, S, NOR, n=42, 48C3D1, S, EL, n=42, 48C3D1, S, NOA, n=42, 48C3D1, L, NOR, n=42, 48C3D1, L, EL, n=42, 48C3D1, L, NOA, n=42, 48C6D1, S, NOR, n=39, 46C6D1, S, EL, n=39, 46C6D1, S, NOA, n=39, 46C6D1, L, NOR, n=39, 46C6D1, L, EL, n=39, 46C6D1, L, NOA, n=39, 4612 Month F/U, S, NOR, n=39, 2912 Month F/U, S, EL, n=39, 2912 Month F/U, S, NOA, n=39, 2912 Month F/U, L, NOR, n=39, 2912 Month F/U, L, EL, n=39, 2912 Month F/U, L, NOA, n=39, 2924 Month F/U, S, NOR, n=29, 1724 Month F/U, S, EL, n=29, 1724 Month F/U, S, NOA, n=29, 1724 Month F/U, L, NOR, n=29, 1724 Month F/U, L, EL, n=29, 1724 Month F/U, L, NOA, n=29, 1736 Month F/U, S, NOR, n=21, 936 Month F/U, S, EL, n=21, 936 Month F/U, S, NOA, n=21, 936 Month F/U, L, NOR, n=21, 936 Month F/U, L, EL, n=21, 936 Month F/U, L, NOA, n=21, 9
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^231190419141614251432144022810281016101610900900
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^22321038603750384039003720390038102900290021002100

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable Region (IgVH) Testing at Baseline Who Also Had a Clinical Response After Last Dose of Study Treatment

Participants with IgVH mutation results as mutated and unmutated status and clinical response after last dose of study treatment were provided. Clinical responses included complete remission (CR), complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi), nodular partial remission (nPR), partial remission (PR), disease progression (PD), and stable disease (SD). The participants with a PR, CRi, PR or nPR are called responders and the participants with SD and PD are called non-responders. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment until earliest date of disease progression or death (up to up to 3 months following last dose of study treatment)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
IgVH Mutated (<=98 %), CR, n=12, 13IgVH Mutated (<=98 %), CRi, n=12, 13IgVH Mutated (<=98 %), nPR, n=12, 13IgVH Mutated (<=98 %), PR, n=12, 13IgVH Mutated (<=98 %), SD, n=12, 13IgVH Mutated (<=98 %), PD, n=12, 13IgVH unmutated (>98%), CR, n=23, 34IgVH unmutated (>98%), CRi, n=23, 34IgVH unmutated (>98%), nPR, n=23, 34IgVH unmutated (>98%), PR, n=23, 34IgVH unmutated (>98%), SD, n=23, 34IgVH unmutated (>98%), PD, n=23, 34
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^24042031241853
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^26204001115500

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 or Grade 4 Myelosuppression (Anemia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia), as Assessed by the Investigator

Participants with a Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) are presented. Myelosuppression is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. AEs were graded according to NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade, version 4.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death). (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Neutropenia/Febrile neutropenia, Grade 3Neutropenia/Febrile Neutropenia, Grade 4Thrombocytopenia, Grade 3Thrombocytopenia, Grade 4Anemia, Grade 3Anemia, Grade 4
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^227162200
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2891010

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Cytogenetics Testing at Baseline Who Also Had a Clinical Response After Last Dose of Study Treatment

Cytogenetics refers to the study of numerical and structural chromosomal abnormalities. Cytogenetics (analyzed by fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH]) of 17p deletion, 11q deletion, 17p or 11q deletions, 6q- or +12q or 13q- deletions, and no aberration at Baseline were summarized by clinical responses after the last dose of study treatment. Clinical responses included complete remission (CR), nodular partial remission (nPR), complete response with incomplete bone marrow Recovery (CRi), partial remission (PR), disease progression (PD), and stable disease (SD). The participants with a PR, CRi, PR or nPR are called responders and the participants with SD and PD are called non-responders. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment until earliest date of disease progression or death (up to up to 3 months following last dose of study treatment)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
17p-, CR, n=2, 617p-, CRi, n=2, 617p-, nPR, n=2, 617p-, PR, n=2, 617p-, SD, n=2, 617p-, PD, n=2, 611q-, CR, n=8, 1511q-, CRi, No, n=8, 1511q-, nPR, n=8, 1511q-, PR, n=8, 1511q-, SD, n=8, 1511q-, PD, n=8, 1517p- or 11q-, CR, n=10, 2017p- or 11q-, CRi, n=10, 2017p- or 11q-, nPR, n=10, 2017p- or 11q-, PR, n=10, 2017p- or 11q-, SD, n=10, 2017p- or 11q-, PD, n=10, 206q- or +12q or 13q-, CR, n=20, 246q- or +12q or 13q-, CRi, n=20, 246q- or +12q or 13q-, nPR, n=20, 246q- or +12q or 13q-, PR, n=20, 246q- or +12q or 13q-, SD, n=20, 246q- or +12q or 13q-, PD, n=20, 24No aberration, CR, n= 14, 8No aberration, CRi, n= 14, 8No aberration, nPR, n= 14, 8No aberration, PR, n= 14, 8No aberration, SD, n= 14, 8No aberration, PD, n= 14, 8
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^20001321037131038353241022201401
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^20000103014003014101111700523400

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Constitutional or B-symptoms

Participants with the indicated constitutional or B-symptoms (night sweats, weight loss, fever or extreme fatigue) were presented for different time points. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: Screening (SCR), Cycle 3 Day 1 (C3D1), Cycle 6 Day 1 (C6D1), 12, 24 and 36 Month Follow-up (F/U)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
SCR, night sweats, n =44, 52SCR, weight loss, n=44, 52SCR, fever, n=44, 52SCR, extreme fatigue, n=44, 52C3D1, night sweats, n =42, 49C3D1, weight loss, n=42, 49C3D1, fever, n=42, 49C3D1, extreme fatigue, n=42, 49C6D1, night sweats, n =39, 47C6D1, weight loss, n =39, 47C6D1, fever, n =39, 47C6D1, extreme fatigue, n =39, 4712 Month F/U, night sweats, n =39, 2912 Month F/U, weight loss, n =39, 2912 Month F/U, fever, n =39, 2912 Month F/U, extreme fatigue, n =39, 2924 Month F/U, night sweats, n =29, 1724 Month F/U, weight loss, n=29, 1724 Month F/U, fever, n=29, 1724 Month F/U, extreme fatigue, n=29, 1736 Month F/U, night sweats, n =21, 936 Month F/U, weight loss, n=21, 936 Month F/U, fever, n=21, 936 Month F/U, extreme fatigue, n=21, 9
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^222521522041001000000000000
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^219411450020000010000010000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Beta 2 Microglobulin (B2M) at Baseline Who Also Had a Clinical Response After the Last Dose of Study Treatment

Participants with B2M concentration of <=4000 µg/L and >4000 µg/L at Baseline and who had clinical response after the last dose of study treatment were provided. Clinical responses included complete remission (CR), complete response with incomplete bone marrow Recovery (CRi), nodular partial remission (nPR), and partial remission (PR), disease progression (PD), and stable disease (SD). The participants with a PR, CRi, PR or nPR are called responders and the participants with SD and PD are called non-responders. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment until earliest date of disease progression or death (up to up to 3 months following last dose of study treatment)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
<= 4000 µg/L, CR, n=23, 24<= 4000 µg/L, CRi, n=23, 24<= 4000 µg/L, nPR, n=23, 24<= 4000 µg/L, PR, n=23, 24<= 4000 µg/L, SD, n=23, 24<= 4000 µg/L, PD, n=23, 24> 4000 µg/L, CR, n=17, 29> 4000 µg/L, CRi, n=17, 29> 4000 µg/L, nPR, n=17, 29> 4000 µg/L, PR, n=17, 29> 4000 µg/L, SD, n=17, 29> 4000 µg/L, PD, n=17, 29
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^23269223021436
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2934700901600

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the Investigator

OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]), after 3 cycles, after 6 cycles, and after the last dose of ofatumumab and bendamustine treatment. CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly)/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL, LC <4000/µL. nPR: persistent nodules BM. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment until 3 months after the last dose of study treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
CRCRinPRPR
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^262823
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2192417

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR) With Computed Tomography (CT) Scan (CT Scan) Assessment, as Assessed by the Investigator

OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]), after 3 cycles, after 6 cycles, and after the last dose of ofatumumab and bendamustine treatment. CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly)/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL, LC <4000/µL. nPR: persistent nodules BM. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment until 3 months after the last dose of study treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
CRCRinPRPR
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^252624
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2121222

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Confirmed Positive Response for Human Anti-human Antibodies (HAHA) at the Indicated Time Points

The presence of HAHA in human serum was determined using a validated electrochemiluminescent assay in a multi-tier assay format. All samples were first assessed in a screening (SCR) assay, and the potential positive (Pos) samples were further tested in the confirmation (CNF) assays. Confirmed positives were reported as HAHA positive and titer was determined for each positive sample. The drug tolerance of the HAHA assay is 200 microgram/milliliter (µg/mL); thus, samples that tested negative in the assay and had ofatumumab concentrations no more than 200 µg/mL were considered as conclusive negative (C Neg) results. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1), Cycle 6 Day 1 (C6D1), 6-Month Follow-up (F/U), and any post-dose time point

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
C1D1, n=41, 53C6D1, n=34, 436-Month F/U, n=35, 37Any post dose time, n=42, 47
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^20000
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^20000

[back to top]

Investigator-assessed Kaplan-meier Estimates of Duration of Response

The duration of response is defined as the time from the initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to the first documented sign of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: new lesion or increase by >=50% from Baseline in lymphocytes (LC) with at least 5000B-lymphocytes per microliter (5.0 x 10^9/L), lymphadenopathy (Ly), size of liver and spleen, platelets (PL) >= 50% decrease from Baseline, or to <100,000/uL secondary to CLL, hemoglobin (Hb) decrease of >2 g/dL from Baseline or to <10 g/dL secondary to CLL, CLL- transformation, cytopenia after treatment. Response was determined according to the IWCLL updated NCI-WG guidelines 2008. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From time of initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to disease progression or death, whichever came first (up to 3 years after the last doseof study treatment)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^235.15
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^221.75

[back to top]

Investigator-assessed Kaplan-meier Estimates of Overall Survival

OS is defined as the interval of time between the date of the first administration of study treatment and the date of death due to any cause. For participants who did not die, time of death was censored at the date of last contact. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment to the date of death due to any cause (up to 3 years after the last dose of study treatment)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2NA
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^2NA

[back to top]

Investigator-Assessed Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Progression

Time to progression is defined as the time from the date of the first administration of study treatment to disease progression (PD). PD requires at least one of the following: new lesion or increase by >=50% from Baseline in lymphocytes (LC) with at least 5000 B-lymphocytes per microliter (5.0 x 10^9/L), lymphadenopathy (Ly), size of liver and spleen, platelets (PL) >= 50% decrease from Baseline, or to <100,000/uL secondary to CLL, hemoglobin (Hb) decrease of >2 g/dL from Baseline or to <10 g/dL secondary to CLL, CLL- transformation, cytopenia after treatment. Response was determined according to the IWCLL updated NCI-WG guidelines 2008. (NCT01520922)
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment to disease progression (up to 3 years after the last dose of study treatment)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^236.0
Ofatumumab + Bendamustine 70 mg/m^222.67

[back to top]

Adverse Events in Terms of Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) and MTD of Bendamustine Hydrochloride (Phase I)

Dose limiting toxicity will be defined during cycle 1 only of the phase I trial. Hematologic and Infectious Dose Limiting Toxicities include: Grade 3 febrile neutropenia persisting> 7 days, Grade 4 infection or febrile neutropenia. Treatment delay>14 days due to grade 3-4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Non-Hematological Dose Limiting Toxicities include: any Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity related to study treatment with the exception of nausea or vomiting, alopecia, or electrolyte/glucose abnormalities that are correctable within 72 hours. (NCT01535924)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

Interventionnumber of patients (Number)
Phase 1 (Dose Levels 1)0
Phase 1 (Dose Levels 2)0
Phase 1 (Dose Levels 3)0
Phase 1 (Dose Levels 4)0

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) of Bendamustine Hydrochloride and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma (Phase II)

Tested using Simon's two-stage Minimax design. Descriptive statistics (i.e. means, standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals for continuous variables, and frequencies for discrete data) and graphical analyses will be used for all correlative laboratory parameters. The associations between correlative laboratory parameters and clinical response will be evaluated using two sample t test or Fisher's exact test, whichever is appropriate. (NCT01535924)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Phase 2 (Dose Levels 5)67
Phase 271

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the interval from randomization to the earlier of the first documentation of definitive disease progression or death from any cause. PFS (months) = (minimum (date of disease progression, date of death) - date of randomization + 1)/30.4375. (NCT01569295)
Timeframe: Up to 84 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Idelalisib + Bendamustine + Rituximab21.8
Placebo + Bendamustine + Rituximab11.1

[back to top]

Lymph Node Response Rate

Lymph node response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a ≥ 50% decrease from baseline in the sum of the products of the greatest perpendicular diameters (SPD) of index lesions. (NCT01569295)
Timeframe: Up to 84 months

Interventionpercentage of particpants (Number)
Idelalisib + Bendamustine + Rituximab96.9
Placebo + Bendamustine + Rituximab60.9

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"ORR was the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR), CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi,) or partial response (PR) and maintained the response for at least 12 weeks. CR was defined as no lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly; normal complete blood count; confirmed by bone marrow aspirate & biopsy.~PR was defined as >1 of the following criteria: a 50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocytes, lymphadenopathy, liver size, spleen size; plus ≥ 1 of the following: ≥ 1500/μL absolute neutrophil count, > 100000/μL platelets, > 11.0 g/dL hemoglobin or 50% improvement for either of these parameters without transfusions or growth factors. CRi was defined as all criteria for CR met but with persistent anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia or a hypocellular bone marrow." (NCT01569295)
Timeframe: Up to 84 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Idelalisib + Bendamustine + Rituximab70.0
Placebo + Bendamustine + Rituximab45.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval from randomization to death from any cause. Overall survival (months) = (date of death - date of randomization + 1)/30.4375. (NCT01569295)
Timeframe: Up to 84 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Idelalisib + Bendamustine + Rituximab56.2
Placebo + Bendamustine + Rituximab42.6

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

Complete response (CR) rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a CR. (NCT01569295)
Timeframe: Up to 84 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Idelalisib + Bendamustine + Rituximab4.3
Placebo + Bendamustine + Rituximab0.5

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Bendamustine

(NCT01596621)
Timeframe: Prior to the start of infusion on Day 1 for up to 24 hours after the end of infusion during Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days)

Interventionnanograms (ng)/milliliters (mL) (Mean)
Bendamustine3909.9

[back to top]

Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of Bendamustine

(NCT01596621)
Timeframe: Prior to the start of infusion on Day 1 for up to 24 hours after the end of infusion during Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days)

Interventionhours (Median)
Bendamustine1.30

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) (Assessed by IRC)

Duration of response was defined as the time from the date of first documentation of response to the first documentation of disease progression, new anticancer therapy, or death (regardless of cause), whichever occurred first for participants with a best response of CR or PR determined by the modified International Workshop Response Criteria. CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; nodal masses regression on normal size on CT; spleen and liver not palpable and nodule disappeared; bone marrow infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy. PR: Regression of measurable disease and no new sites; nodal masses ≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 largest dominant masses and no increase in size of other nodes; spleen and liver ≥50% decrease in SPD of nodules and no increase in size of liver or spleen. Disease progression: any new lesion or increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir. (NCT01596621)
Timeframe: From the date of first documentation of response to the first documentation of disease progression, new anticancer therapy, or death (regardless of cause), whichever occurred first (up to 2.5 Years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine16.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'. (NCT01596621)
Timeframe: From first administration of bendamustine through 30 days after the last administration (up to 2.5 Years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine101

[back to top]

Rate Constant for Elimination (λz) of Bendamustine

(NCT01596621)
Timeframe: Prior to the start of infusion on Day 1 for up to 24 hours after the end of infusion during Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days)

Intervention1/hour (Mean)
Bendamustine0.4525

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Measurable Drug Concentration (AUC0-t) of Bendamustine

(NCT01596621)
Timeframe: Prior to the start of infusion on Day 1 for up to 24 hours after the end of infusion during Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days)

Interventionng*hour/mL (Mean)
Bendamustine5660.7

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (Assessed by IRC)

Progression free survival was defined as the time from the date of the first administration of bendamustine to the first documentation of disease progression/relapse, new anticancer therapy, or death (regardless of cause), whichever occurred first for all participants. Disease progression/relapse: appearance of any new lesion or increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir. (NCT01596621)
Timeframe: From the date of the first administration of bendamustine to the first documentation of disease progression/relapse, new anticancer therapy, or death (regardless of cause), whichever occurred first (up to 2.5 Years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine18.6

[back to top]

Percentage of the AUC0-∞ Based on Extrapolation (%AUCext)

(NCT01596621)
Timeframe: Prior to the start of infusion on Day 1 for up to 24 hours after the end of infusion during Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days)

Interventionpercentage of AUC0-∞ (Mean)
Bendamustine0.01

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Assessed by Independent Review Committee [IRC])

The ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) during the study based on the modified International Workshop Response Criteria. CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; nodal masses regression on normal size on computed tomography (CT); spleen and liver not palpable and nodule disappeared; bone marrow infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy. PR: Regression of measurable disease and no new sites; nodal masses ≥50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 largest dominant masses and no increase in size of other nodes; spleen and liver ≥50% decrease in SPD of nodules and no increase in size of liver or spleen. (NCT01596621)
Timeframe: From the date of the first administration of bendamustine to the first documentation of disease progression/relapse, new anticancer therapy, or death (regardless of cause), whichever occurred first (up to 2.5 Years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine73

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Concomitant Medication Usage

Concomitant medications included all medications taken while the participant received study drug. (NCT01596621)
Timeframe: From first administration of bendamustine up to the end of treatment (up to 2.5 Years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine102

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Need At Least 1 Hematologic Supportive Care (Plasma, Blood Cells, or Cytokines)

(NCT01596621)
Timeframe: From first administration of bendamustine up to the end of treatment (up to 2.5 Years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine71

[back to top]

Half-Life (t½) of Bendamustine

(NCT01596621)
Timeframe: Prior to the start of infusion on Day 1 for up to 24 hours after the end of infusion during Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days)

Interventionhours (Mean)
Bendamustine1.83

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) of Bendamustine

(NCT01596621)
Timeframe: Prior to the start of infusion on Day 1 for up to 24 hours after the end of infusion during Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days)

Interventionng*hour/mL (Mean)
Bendamustine6278.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale at End of Treatment

The EQ-5D questionnaire is a brief, generic health-related quality of life assessment (HRQOL) that can also be used to incorporate participant preferences into health economic evaluations. The EQ-5D questionnaire assesses HRQOL in terms of degree of limitation on 5 health dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and as overall health using a visual analog scale with response options ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health). (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT (up to 2 years)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Ibrutinib+BR-4.3
Placebo+BR4.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue Scale at End of Treatment

FACIT-Fatigue is an instrument for use as a measure of the effect of fatigue in patients with cancer and other chronic diseases. Responses to the 13-item FACIT Fatigue Scale are reported on a 5-point categorical response scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worst score) to 52 (best score). (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT (up to 2 years)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Ibrutinib+BR-0.9
Placebo+BR0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Score at End of Treatment

"EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Score is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of cancer patients. It is composed of 30 items, multi-item measure (28 items) and 2 single-item measures. For the multiple item measure, 4-point scale is used and the score for each item range from 1 = not at all to 4 = very much. Higher scores indicate worsening. The 2 single-item measure involves question about the overall health and overall quality of life which was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 = very poor to 7 = excellent. Lower scores indicate worsening. All scale and item scores were linearly transformed to be in range from 0-100. A higher score represents a higher (better) level of functioning, or a higher (worse) level of symptoms." (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT (up to 2 years)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Ibrutinib+BR-2.1
Placebo+BR-4.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Received Subsequent Antineoplastic Therapy

Number of participants who received subsequent antineoplastic therapy was reported. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ibrutinib+BR52
Placebo+BR61

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR defined as number of participants achieving a complete response (CR), complete response with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), nodular partial response (nPR) or partial response (PR). IWCLL 2008 criteria: CR- No lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly, no constitutional symptoms, neutrophils >1.5*10^9/liter (L), platelets >100*10^9/L, Hgb >11 gram per deciliter (g/dL) and absolute lymphocyte count <4000/microliter (mcL); CRi- CR with incomplete recovery of bone marrow; nPR- participants meet criteria for CR, but the bone marrow biopsy shows B-lymphoid nodules, may represent a clonal infiltrate; PR-2 of the following when abnormal at baseline: >=50% decrease in ALC, >=50% decrease in sum products of up to 6 lymph nodes, >=50% decrease in enlargement of spleen or liver; and 1 of the following: neutrophils >1.5*10^9/L, Platelets >100*10^9/L and Hgb>11 g/dL or >=50% improvement over baseline in any of these; no new enlarged nodes or new hepatosplenomegaly. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ibrutinib+BR87.2
Placebo+BR66.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of death from any cause. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ibrutinib+BRNA
Placebo+BRNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Response

MRD-negative response was defined as the percentage of participants who reach MRD negative disease status (less than 1 chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL] cell per 10,000 leukocytes) in either bone marrow or peripheral blood. All randomized participants were included in this analysis. Participants with missing MRD data were considered non-responders. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ibrutinib+BR28.7
Placebo+BR5.9

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of disease progression or death, whichever was first reported. IWCLL 2008 criteria for PD: New enlarged nodes >1.5 cm, new hepatomegaly or splenomegaly, or other new organ infiltrates, bone lesion, ascites, or pleural effusion confirmed due to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); >=50% increase in existing lymph nodes; >=50% increase in enlargement of liver or spleen; >=50% increase from baseline in lymphocyte count (and to >=5*10^9/L) or >=50% increase from nadir count confirmed on >=2 serial assessments if absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) >=30,000 per microliter and lymphocyte doubling time is rapid, unless considered treatment-related lymphocytosis; new cytopenia (Hemoglobin b [Hgb] or platelets) attributable to CLL; and transformation to a more aggressive histology. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ibrutinib+BR65.12
Placebo+BR14.32

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CLL 16 Domain Scores at End of Treatment

The EORTC QLQ-CLL 16 is a 16-item disease specific module that comprises 5 domains of patient-reported health status important in CLL. There are three multi-item scales that include fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects and disease symptoms (8 items), and infection (4 items), and 2 single-item scales on social activities and future health worries. Responses are measured on a 4 point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT (up to 2 years)

,
InterventionUnits on the scale (Mean)
Lost weightDry mouthBruisesAbdominal discomfortTemperature going up and downNight sweatsSkin problemsFeel illFeel lethargicFelt slowed downLimited in planning activitiesWorried about health in the futureTrouble with chest infectionsTrouble with other infectionsRepeated courses of antibioticsWorried about picking up infection
Ibrutinib+BR0.10.30.10.10.1-0.60.40.10.10.30.20.00.20.70.90.3
Placebo+BR0.00.10.00.00.0-0.30.30.20.00.00.10.00.00.10.00.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Hematologic Improvement

Sustained hematologic improvement was defined as hematological improvement that was sustained continuously for greater than or equal to (>=) 56 days without blood transfusion or growth factors: 1) Platelet counts greater than (>)100* 109/liter (L) if baseline less than or equal to (<=) 100*109/L or increase >= 50 percent (%) over baseline; 2) Hemoglobin >11 gram per deciliters (g/dL) if baseline <= 11 g/dL or increase >= 2 g/dL over baseline. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
HemoglobinPlatelets
Ibrutinib+BR36.730.8
Placebo+BR29.121.8

[back to top]

Median Time to Clinically Meaningful Improvement in FACIT-Fatigue Scale

Time to improvement is defined as the time interval (months) from randomization to the first observation of improvement. FACIT-Fatigue is an instrument for use as a measure of the effect of fatigue in patients with cancer and other chronic diseases. Responses to the 13-item FACIT Fatigue Scale are reported on a 5-point categorical response scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worst score) to 52 (best score). (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionMonths (Number)
Ibrutinib+BR6.5
Placebo+BR4.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Beta2 Microglobulin at End of Treatment (EOT)

Change from baseline in beta2 microglobulin at end of treatment at time of primary analysis was reported. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT (Up to 2 years)

Interventionmilligram per liter (mg/L) (Mean)
Ibrutinib+BR-0.46
Placebo+BR-0.23

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score Scale at End of Treatment

The EuroQol-5 is a five dimensional health state classification. Each dimension is assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1. High score indicating a high level of utility. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT (up to 2 years)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Ibrutinib+BR0.0
Placebo+BR0.0

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

Defined as the time from date of first treatment to the date of first documented disease progression or relapse from complete response as defined by the International Working Group (IMW)-revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma (Cheson 2007). This criteria categorizes the response of a patient's tumor to treatment as Complete Response (CR): the disappearance of all disease evidence; Partial Response (PR): regression of measurable disease and no new sites; Stable Disease (SD): less than a PR but not progressive disease (PD); Relapsed Disease or PD: Any new lesion or increase by ≥ 50% of previously involved sites from nadir. (NCT01626352)
Timeframe: After cycles 3 and 6 of each 21-day cycle, and every 3 months thereafter until progression or relapse from complete response for up to 40 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine/Ofatumumab10.5

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Defined as the time from first treatment until objective tumor progression, relapse from complete response, or death from any cause. Tumor response is defined by the International Working Group (IMW)-revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma (Cheson 2007). This criteria categorizes the response of a patient's tumor to treatment as Complete Response (CR): the disappearance of all disease evidence; Partial Response (PR): regression of measurable disease and no new sites; Stable Disease (SD): less than a PR but not progressive disease (PD); Relapsed Disease or PD: Any new lesion or increase by ≥ 50% of previously involved sites from nadir. Patients who are alive and free from disease progression will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment. (NCT01626352)
Timeframe: After cycles 3 and 6 of each 21-day cycle, and every 3 months thereafter until progression or relapse from complete response for up to 40 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine/Ofatumumab8.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Defined as the time from Day 1 of study drug administration to date of death from any cause. (NCT01626352)
Timeframe: every 3 cycles during treatment and every 3 months thereafter until progression or death from any cause, projected 18 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine/Ofatumumab12.0

[back to top]

Overall Response (OR)

Overall response is the number of patients with observed complete or partial response (CR or PR) as assessed using the International Working Group (IMW) revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Complete response requires disappearance of all evidence of disease. Partial response requires regression of measurable disease and no new sites. (NCT01626352)
Timeframe: after cycles 3 and 6 of each 21-day cycle, and every 3 months thereafter, projected 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine/Ofatumumab19

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Patients With a Complete Response

Disease response assessments will be performed using the International Working Group (IMW)-revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Complete response requires a disappearance of all evidence of disease. (NCT01626352)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine/Ofatumumab7

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Defined as the time from date of first documented confirmed response to date of disease progression or relapse from complete response as defined by the International Working Group (IMW)-revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma (Cheson 2007). This criteria categorizes the response of a patient's tumor to treatment as Complete Response (CR): the disappearance of all disease evidence; Partial Response (PR): regression of measurable disease and no new sites; Stable Disease (SD): less than a PR but not progressive disease (PD); Relapsed Disease or PD: Any new lesion or increase by ≥ 50% of previously involved sites from nadir. Patients who are alive and free from disease progression will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment. Patients who begin further anticancer therapy prior to disease progression will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment prior to the start date of the anticancer therapy. (NCT01626352)
Timeframe: After cycles 3 and 6 of each 21-day cycle and every 3 months thereafter until disease progression or relapse from complete response for up to 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine/Ofatumumab5.6

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate After 6 Cycles

The CR rate is defined as the proportion of patients who after 6 cycles of therapy achieve complete remission based on the International Working Group (IWG) Criteria (Cheson et al, 1999), using CT scans. CR or CRu (CR unconfirmed) by CT scans was defined by standard IWG criteria, ie resolution of all abnormal adenopathy and organomegaly, and clearance of marrow disease when present at baseline. (NCT01661881)
Timeframe: Disease was assessed after three- and six-cycles of therapy, up to approximately 25 weeks. All patients completed 6 cycles of therapy with a cycle duration of 28 days.

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
RB/RC.96

[back to top]

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) Rate

ASCT rate is the proportion of patients who completed therapy and proceeded to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) (NCT01661881)
Timeframe: All patients were followed for continuation to ASCT upon completion of induction therapy. Patients usually proceed to ASCT within 3 months of completing induction.

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
RB/RC.91

[back to top]

1 Year Progression-Free Survival

1-year progression-free survival is the probability of patients remaining alive and progression-free at 1 year from study entry estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Disease progression was based on the International Working Group (IWG) Criteria (Cheson et al, 1999). (NCT01661881)
Timeframe: Disease was assessed after three- and six-cycles of therapy and in long-term follow-up per standard practice every 6 months until the earliest of relapse, death or 5 years. Median follow-up in this study cohort was 13 months.

Interventionprobability (Number)
RB/RC.96

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: Randomization of first participant to clinical cutoff date (Up to 4 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm A352
Arm B347

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS)

EFS was defined as the time from randomization to first occurrence of progression or relapse according to IWG response criteria. IWG criteria is defined using the following response categories: CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; partial response (PR): At least a 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to six of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; stable disease (SD): participants fails to attain the criteria needed for a CR or PR, but does not fulfill those for progressive disease (PD); PD: Lymph nodes considered abnormal if the long axis is more than 1.5 centimeter (cm) regardless of the short axis. Lymph node has a long axis of 1.1 to 1.5 cm, it is considered abnormal if its short axis is more than 1.0. Lymph nodes less than or equal to (<=) 1.0 × <= 1.0 cm would not be considered as abnormal for PD. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: From the time of randomization until disease progression or 24 months post treatment follow up or which ever occur first (Up to 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm ANA
Arm BNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Anti-Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) Antibodies Over Time

(NCT01724021)
Timeframe: Pre-dose Cycle 1 to 8, interim staging, final staging, 6, 12 months follow-up, end of study (Up to 4 years)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Interim stagingCycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Final stagingFollow-up, 6 monthsFollow-up, 12 monthsEnd of study/early treatment termination
Arm A11.47.07.17.09.012.516.023.813.310.06.57.73.5
Arm B15.618.223.514.79.710.211.610.911.012.613.48.76.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: From the time of randomization until disease progression or 24 months post treatment follow up or which ever occur first (Up to 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm ANA
Arm BNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Indicating a Preference for Rituximab Subcutaneous (SC) Over Rituximab Intravenously (IV) at Cycle 6

Participants who preferred rituximab SC over rituximab IV, along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), were estimated using the patient preference questionnaire (PPQ) after completing cycle 6. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: Cycle 6 (Up to 24 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A79.1
Arm B80.6

[back to top]

Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Score

CTSQ is a validated 16-item questionnaire that measures three domains related to participants' satisfaction with cancer therapy. These include expectations of therapy, feelings about side effects, and satisfaction with therapy. Each domain is scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of more positive feelings toward therapy. The score for each domain was averaged among all participants. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: During Cycle 4, 8 of treatment (Up to 32 weeks)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Expectations of therapy domainFeelings about side effects domainSatisfaction with therapy domain
Rituximab Intravenous (IV)80.8860.6384.59
Rituximab Subcutaneous (SC)82.0761.6485.42

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Indicating a Preference for Rituximab Subcutaneous (SC) Over Rituximab Intravenously (IV) at Cycle 8

Participants who preferred rituximab SC over rituximab IV, along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), were estimated using the patient preference questionnaire (PPQ) after completing Cycle 8. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: Cycle 8 (Up to 32 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A77.1
Arm B84.2

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR) Rate

CR rate was assessed according to the International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria (CHESON ET AL. 1999) and included CR and CR unconfirmed (CRu). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms, regression of lymph nodes to normal size, absence of splenomegaly, and absence of bone marrow involvement. CRu was defined as disappearance of clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and absence of splenomegaly, with regression of lymph nodes by > 75 % but still >1.5 cm in size, and indeterminate bone marrow assessment. Tumor assessments were based on computed tomography (CT) scans with contrast of the neck, chest, and abdomen (if detectable by these techniques) or other diagnostic means, if applicable. Other methods (e.g., MRI) were acceptable for participants in whom contrast CT scans were contraindicated. Due to the limited availability of FDG-PET scanners, an FDG-PET scan was not mandated in the study. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: 28 days (± 3 days) after Day 1 of the last dose of induction treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A49.2
Arm B52.7

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS)

DFS was defined as the period from the data of the initial CR/CRu until the date of relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: From the time of randomization until disease progression or 24 months post treatment follow up or which ever occur first (Up to 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm ANA
Arm BNA

[back to top]

Summary of Observed Serum Rituximab Concentration

(NCT01724021)
Timeframe: Pre-dose Cycle 1 to 8, interim staging, final staging, 6, 12 months follow-up, end of study (Up to 4 years)

,
Interventionmicrogram per milliter (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Interim stagingCycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Final stagingFollow-up, 6 monthsFollow-up, 12 monthsEnd of study/early treatment termination
Arm A3355.925053.162977.087956.6117273.6108030.9100927.795614.0104873.086806.67802.92380.19302.0
Arm B970.124541.146093.959485.577665.370387.398679.7117172.0137048.1120995.78042.91685.39553.9

[back to top]

Rituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) Score

The RASQ is a 20-item questionnaire that measures five domains related to the impact of treatment administration. These include physical impact, psychological impact, impact on activities of daily living (ADLs), convenience, and satisfaction. Each domain is scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of more positive feelings toward therapy. The score for each domain was averaged among all participants. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: During Cycle 4, 8 of treatment (Up to 32 weeks)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Physical impact domainPsychological Impact domainImpact on activitiesf daily livingConvenience domainSatisfaction domain
Rituximab Intravenous (IV)82.1477.7359.4959.0574.88
Rituximab Subcutaneous (SC)82.0884.0081.8681.0587.26

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Anti-Rituximab Antibodies Over Time

(NCT01724021)
Timeframe: Pre-dose Cycle 1 to 8, interim staging, final staging, 6, 12 months follow-up, end of study (Up to 4 years)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Interim stagingCycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Final stagingFollow-up, 6 monthsFollow-up, 12 monthsEnd of study/early treatment termination
Arm A2.02.10.300000001.82.10.6
Arm B3.02.20.90.300000000.60.6

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progression or relapse, according to the IWG response criteria. IWG criteria is defined criteria using the following response categories: CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; PR: At least a 50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; SD: participants fails to attain the criteria needed for a CR or PR, but does not fulfill those for PD; PD: Lymph nodes considered abnormal if the long axis is more than 1.5 cm regardless of the short axis. Lymph node has a long axis of 1.1 to 1.5 cm, it is considered abnormal if its short axis is more than 1.0. Lymph nodes <= 1.0 × <= 1.0 cm would not be considered as abnormal for PD. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: From the time of randomization until disease progression or 24 months post treatment follow up or which ever occur first (Up to 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm ANA
Arm BNA

[back to top]

Time Required for Rituximab Administration (Subcutaneous [SC] or Intravenous [IV])

Administration time was defined as the time from start to end of the SC injection or from start to end of the IV infusion (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: Cycle 1-4, Cycle 5-8 for both SC and IV (Up to 32 weeks)

Interventionminutes (Median)
Rituximab Intravenous (IV)840
Rituximab Subcutaneous (SC)22

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Pomalidomide and Bendamustine

"In the phase I dose escalation portion, patients will be sequentially enrolled in 4 cohorts at dose levels in a standard 3+3 design until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is reached.~Cohort 1 (bendamustine 120mg/m2 + pomalidomide 3mg); Cohort 2 (bendamustine 120mg/m2 + pomalidomide 4mg); Cohort 3 (bendamustine 150mg/m2 + pomalidomide 4mg); Cohort 4 (bendamustine 180mg/m2 + pomalidomide 4mg)~If dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is observed in 2 or more of the six patients at the same dosing level while DLT is observed in only 1 or none of the 6 patients at the dosing level immediately below it, then the lower dosing level will be defined as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)." (NCT01754402)
Timeframe: 2 cycles (approximately 2 months)

Interventionmilligrams (Number)
PomalidomideBendamustine
Cohorts 1 and 23120

[back to top]

Initial Response Rate

"The number of patients achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Response is defined by the International Myeloma Working Group as:~CR- Negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow~PR- > 50% reduction of serum M-protein and urine M-protein by >90% or to < 200 mg/24 h In addition, if present at baseline, a > 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required~VGPR - Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but n" (NCT01754402)
Timeframe: 2 cycles (approximately 2 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Partial ResponseVery Good Partial ResponseComplete Response
Cohort 1: 120mg Bendamustine + 3mg Pomalidomide100
Expansion: 120mg Bendamustine + 3mg Pomalidomide1120

[back to top]

Time to Progression

The primary objective is progression-free survival (PFS). Tumor measurements and disease assessments will be performed at the time of screening, following cycles 3 and 6 of induction chemotherapy, every 4 cycles during the maintenance portion of treatment, and at the end of treatment (EOT). Subjects with clinical evidence of progression prior to a planned disease assessment will be evaluated at the time of clinically suspected progression. Follow-up visits for disease assessment will occur every 3 months after the EOT visit until PD, initiation of alternate anti-neoplastic therapy, decision by the subject to withdraw from the study, or death. The follow-up period will begin after the EOT visit, and all subjects will be followed for at least 2 years after completion of therapy or until death or progression and until the last patient has been followed for at least 1 year following completion of therapy. (NCT01754857)
Timeframe: At least 24 months following completion of therapy, an average of 5 years

Interventionyears (Median)
Bendamustine, Rituximab, Lenalidomide4.76

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death. (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Up to 97 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)NA
Placebo + BR (Treatment A)NA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response

Percentage of participants with overall response that is participants who achieved CR or PR was reported. Criteria for CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; mass of any size permitted if PET negative; regression to normal size on CT; spleen and liver: not palpable, nodules disappeared; bone marrow: infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy. Criteria for PR: greater than or equal to (>=) 50% decrease in sum of the diameter of all target lesions compared with baseline, in absence of new lesions or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Up to 97 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)89.7
Placebo + BR (Treatment A)88.5

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Ibrutinib

Maximum observed plasma concentration of ibrutinib was determined using PopPK modeling. (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Day 2 of Cycles 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle was of 28 days)

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)74.5

[back to top]

Time-to-Next Treatment

Time-to-next treatment was measured from the date of randomization to the start date of any anti-mantle cell lymphoma (anti-MCL) treatment subsequent to the study treatment. (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Up to 97 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)NA
Placebo + BR (Treatment A)92.0

[back to top]

Oral Volume of Distribution at Steady State of Ibrutinib

Oral volume of distribution at steady state of ibrutinib was determined using PopPK modeling. (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Day 2 of Cycles 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle was of 28 days)

Interventionliter (Mean)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)7286

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR)

Duration of Response (DoR) was defined as the interval between the date of initial documentation of a response including PR and the date of first documented evidence of PD or death. (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Up to 97 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)81
Placebo + BR (Treatment A)63.5

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Response (DoCR)

Duration of complete response (DoCR) was defined as the interval between the date of initial documentation of a CR and the date of first documented evidence of PD or death whichever occurs first, for participants who achieved CR. (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Up to 97 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)NA
Placebo + BR (Treatment A)78.1

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

Complete response (CR) rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve CR (based on investigator assessment) on or prior to the initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy. Criteria for CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; mass of any size permitted if positron emission tomography (PET) negative; regression to normal size on computed tomography (CT); spleen and liver: not palpable, nodules disappeared; bone marrow: infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy. (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Up to 97 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)65.5
Placebo + BR (Treatment A)57.6

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Curve of Ibrutinib During 24 Hours After Dosing at Steady State

Area under the concentration curve of ibrutinib during 24 hours after dosing at steady state was determined using PopPK modeling. (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Day 2 of Cycles 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle was of 28 days)

Interventionnanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Mean)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)425

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Number of participants with TEAEs were reported. Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment up to and including 30 days after date of last dose of study medication, or the initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy, whichever is earlier. (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Up to 97 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)259
Placebo + BR (Treatment A)257

[back to top]

Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration of Ibrutinib

Minimum observed plasma concentration of ibrutinib was determined using PopPK modeling. (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Day 2 of Cycles 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle was of 28 days)

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)3.90

[back to top]

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Response Rate

Minimal residual disease negative rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR with MRD-negative disease status (that is, <5 mantle cell lymphoma [MCL] cell per 10,000 leukocytes for detection using the MRD assay), as assessed by flow cytometry of a bone marrow and/or peripheral blood sample. (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Up to 97 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)62.1
Placebo + BR (Treatment A)56.5

[back to top]

Oral Plasma Clearance (CL/F) of Ibrutinib

CL/F of Ibrutinib was determined using population pharmacokinetics (PopPK modeling). (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Day 2 of Cycles 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle was of 28 days)

Interventionliter per hour (L/h) (Mean)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)1123

[back to top]

Time to Worsening (TTW) in the Lymphoma (Lym) Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Questionnaire

"Time to worsening in the Lymphoma subscale of the FACT-Lym, defined as the interval from the date of randomization to the start date of worsening of participant symptoms. Worsening was defined by a 5-point decrease from baseline, death, or a missing assessment due to being too ill, whichever occurred first. FACT-Lym Lymphoma subscale contains 15 questions, scores from 0 to 4 for each question (higher the worse). Lymphoma subscale score is the total of reverse scores, range 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life." (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Up to 97 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)17.4
Placebo + BR (Treatment A)22.2

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of initial documentation of a response. (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Up to 97 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)2.79
Placebo + BR (Treatment A)2.79

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the interval between the date of randomization to the date of disease progression (PD) or relapse from complete response (CR) or death, whichever is first reported. Disease assessments were based on the 2007 Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. PD is defined as any new lesion or increase by 50 percent (%) of previously involved sites from nadir (PD criteria: Appearance of new nodal lesion 1.5 centimeters [cm] in any axis, 50% increase in sum of product of diameters [SPD] of greater than [>] 1 node or 50% increase in longest diameter of previously identified node 1 cm in short axis). (NCT01776840)
Timeframe: Up to 97 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ibrutinib + BR (Treatment B)80.6
Placebo + BR (Treatment A)52.9

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

The time from first dose of study medication to first documentation of disease progression/relapse, or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. (NCT01874054)
Timeframe: Up to 49 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Brentuximab Vedotin + Bendamustine44.2

[back to top]

Incidence of Dose-limiting Toxicities

Incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was evaluated in an initial safety cohort of 10 patients who were followed for protocol-defined DLT events until Cycle 2 Day 1. (NCT01874054)
Timeframe: Up to 3 weeks; first cycle of therapy through the first day of Cycle 2

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Brentuximab Vedotin + Bendamustine0

[back to top]

Duration of Response

The time from first observation of remission to disease progression/relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. (NCT01874054)
Timeframe: Up to 47.8 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Brentuximab Vedotin + Bendamustine43.0

[back to top]

Complete Remission Rate

Complete remission rate among all subjects (Phase 1 and 2 combined) treated at the dose level selected for Phase 2. Complete remission (CR) per Cheson 2007 Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma is a disappearance of all evidence of disease. (NCT01874054)
Timeframe: Up to 4.6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Brentuximab Vedotin + Bendamustine73.6

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)

All AEs reported after initiation of treatment and pre-existing conditions that worsen after initiation of treatment will be considered treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs). All AEs will be coded by system organ class, MedDRA preferred term, and severity grade using NCI CTCAE V4.03. All recorded AEs will be included in the data listings. (NCT01874054)
Timeframe: Up to 13.8 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Any TEAE with Severity >= Grade 3Any Treatment-Related Adverse EventAny Serious Adverse EventAny Treatment-Related Serious Adverse EventTreatment Discontinuation Due to Adverse Event
Brentuximab Vedotin + Bendamustine553154181520

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving a Biopsy-proven Complete Response (CR)

Complete response (CR) requires all of the following: absence of lymphadenopathy > 1.5 cm on physical exam/CT scan, no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly on physical exam, no clonal B-cells in the blood, Normal CBC, bone marrow aspirate and biopsy must be normocellular for age. Complete response rate and corresponding exact binomial 95% confidence intervals provided. (NCT01886872)
Timeframe: Performed at 2.5 years after the last patient enrolled; up to 4 years.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm A (Rituximab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride)26
Arm B (Ibrutinib)7
Arm C (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)12

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) (Complete Response [CR], CCR, Nodular Partial Response [nPR], Partial Response [PR], and PRL)

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate median DOR. DOR is the time from first objective status to progression or death. CR requires all of the following: absence of lymphadenopathy > 1.5 cm on physical exam/CT scan, no hepatomegaly/splenomegaly on physical exam, no clonal B-cells in the blood, Normal CBC, bone marrow aspirate & biopsy must be normocellular for age. PR requires >= 50% decrease in peripheral lymphocyte count from pre-treatment value, >= 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy, and/or ≥ 50% reduction in splenomegaly/hepatomegaly. CR with exception of having bone marrow lymphoid CLL nodules will be considered a nodular PR (nPR). CR with exception of not having a bone marrow biopsy performed will be considered a clinical CR (CCR). PR with the exception of having less than a 50% reduction in peripheral lymphocyte count will be considered a PR except persistent lymphocytosis (PRL). (NCT01886872)
Timeframe: From the date of first response until progression or death, performed at 2.5 years after the last patient enrolled; up to 4 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (Rituximab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride)50
Arm B (Ibrutinib)NA
Arm C (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)NA

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) at 2 Years

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the rate of overall survival at 2 years in each treatment arm. OS will be measured from the date of registration to the date of the event (i.e., death) or the date of last follow-up to evaluate that event. Patients who are event-free at their last follow-up evaluation will be censored at that time point. (NCT01886872)
Timeframe: From the date of registration to the date of death, assessed up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm A (Rituximab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride)95
Arm B (Ibrutinib)90
Arm C (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)94

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 2 Years

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the rate of progression free survival at 2 years in each treatment arm. Progression is defined as any one of the following: an increase in number of blood lymphocytes by >= 50%, >= 50% increase in the products of at least 2 lymph nodes on 2 consecutive determination 2 weeks apart, >= 50% increase in the size of the liver/spleen, transformation to a more aggressive histology, progression of any cytopenia (i.e. decrease of Hb levels > 2g/dL). Progression free survival time will be the time to either progression or death whichever occurs first. (NCT01886872)
Timeframe: Time from study entry to the time of documented disease progression or death, assessed up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm A (Rituximab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride)74
Arm B (Ibrutinib)87
Arm C (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)88

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the progression free survival distributions for each arm, with median estimates provided. Progression is defined as any one of the following: an increase in number of blood lymphocytes by >= 50% with >= 5000 B lymphocytes/mL in patients on Arm A or those on Arms 2 or 3 no longer receiving ibrutinib, >= 50% increase in the products of at least 2 lymph nodes on 2 consecutive determination 2 weeks apart, >= 50% increase in the size of the liver/spleen, transformation to a more aggressive histology, progression of any cytopenia (i.e. decrease of Hb levels > 2g/dL). Progression free survival time will be the time to either progression or death whichever occurs first. (NCT01886872)
Timeframe: Time from study entry to the time of documented disease progression or death. The analysis was event driven, performed at 2.5 years after the last patient enrolled;up to 4 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (Rituximab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride)43
Arm B (Ibrutinib)NA
Arm C (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)NA

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving Any Response to Treatment (Overall Response Rate [ORR] [Complete Response [CR], CCR, Nodular Partial Response [nPR], Partial Response [PR], and PRL])

Complete response (CR) requires all of the following: absence of lymphadenopathy >1.5 cm on physical exam/CT scan, no hepatomegaly/splenomegaly on physical exam, no clonal B-cells in the blood, Normal CBC, bone marrow aspirate & biopsy must be normocellular for age. Partial response (PR) requires >= 50% decrease in peripheral lymphocyte count from pre-treatment value, >= 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy, and/or ≥ 50% reduction in splenomegaly/hepatomegaly. CR with exception of having bone marrow lymphoid CLL nodules will be considered a nodular PR (nPR). CR with exception of not having a bone marrow biopsy performed will be considered a clinical CR (CCR). PR with the exception of having less than a 50% reduction in peripheral lymphocyte count will be considered a PR except persistent lymphocytosis (PRL).Overall response rate and corresponding exact binomial 95% CI provided. (NCT01886872)
Timeframe: Performed at 2.5 years after the last patient enrolled;up to 4 years.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm A (Rituximab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride)75
Arm B (Ibrutinib)93
Arm C (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)94

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving Complete (CR and CCR) or Nodular Partial Response (nPR)

Complete response (CR) requires all of the following: absence of lymphadenopathy > 1.5 cm on physical exam/CT scan, no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly on physical exam, no clonal B-cells in the blood, Normal CBC, bone marrow aspirate and biopsy must be normocellular for age. CR with exception of having bone marrow lymphoid CLL nodules will be considered a nodular PR (nPR). CR with exception of not having a bone marrow biopsy performed will be considered a clinical CR (CCR). Response rate and corresponding exact binomial 95% confidence intervals provided. (NCT01886872)
Timeframe: Performed at 2.5 years after the last patient enrolled; up to 4 years.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm A (Rituximab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride)33
Arm B (Ibrutinib)10
Arm C (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)23

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Attain Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Status

Estimated using the number of patients who achieve minimal residual disease divided by the total number randomized to that treatment arm. Corresponding exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for MRD rates will be calculated. (NCT01886872)
Timeframe: Cycle 9 Day 1 Evaluation

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm A (Rituximab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride)8
Arm B (Ibrutinib)1
Arm C (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)4

[back to top]

FL: Plasma Trough Concentrations of Rituximab in Participants With Complete Response/Complete Response Unconfirmed (CR/CRu)

FL participants could be enrolled during induction or maintenance phase and they should have received at least 1 infusion of rituximab and must have been able to receive at least 4 cycles of rituximab SC if enrolled during induction or 4 cycles of rituximab SC if enrolled during maintenance. PK data only collected for participants enrolled during Induction. During the induction phase each Cycle is 21 days. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Induction collection: Cycle 2 Predose, Cycle 3 Predose, Cycle 4 Predose, Cycle 5 Predose, Baseline Predose, and Cycle 8 Predose on Day 1

Interventionmicrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 2 PredoseCycle 3 PredoseCycle 4 PredoseCycle 5 PredoseBaselineCycle 8 Predose
Follicular Lymphoma (FL)48.86156.33200.337.6097.90284.08

[back to top]

FL: Plasma Trough Concentrations of Rituximab

FL participants could be enrolled during induction or maintenance phase and they should have received at least 1 infusion of rituximab and must have been able to receive at least 4 cycles of rituximab SC if enrolled during induction or 4 cycles of rituximab SC if enrolled during maintenance. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data only collected for participants enrolled during Induction. During the induction phase each Cycle is 21 days. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Induction collection: Cycle 2 Predose, Cycle 3 Predose, Cycle 4 Predose, Cycle 5 Predose, Baseline Predose, and Cycle 8 Predose on Day 1

Interventionmicrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 2 PredoseCycle 3 PredoseCycle 4 PredoseCycle 5 PredoseBaselineCycle 8 Predose
Follicular Lymphoma (FL)55.49119.50157.257.6090.88201.56

[back to top]

DLBCL: Plasma Trough Concentrations of Rituximab in Participants With Complete Response/Complete Response Unconfirmed (CR/CRu)

DLBCL participants received at least 1 infusion of rituximab and must have been able to receive at least 4 cycles of rituximab SC; therefore DLBCL participants could be enrolled at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5 and as a result the baseline PK sample could be collected at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5. Each Cycle is 21 days. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Predose, Cycle 3 Predose, Cycle 4 Predose, Cycle 5 Predose, Baseline Predose, Cycle 7 Predose on Day 1, Cycle 7 Day 7, Cycle 7 Day 14, Cycle 8 Predose on Day 1

Interventionmicrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 2 PredoseCycle 3 PredoseCycle 4 PredoseCycle 5 PredoseBaselineCycle 7 PredoseCycle 8 Predose
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)53.97101.79110.50121.67109.40157.93132.57

[back to top]

DLBCL: Plasma Trough Concentrations of Rituximab

DLBCL participants received at least 1 infusion of rituximab and must have been able to receive at least 4 cycles of rituximab SC; therefore DLBCL participants could be enrolled at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5 and as a result the baseline PK sample could be collected at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5. Each Cycle is 21 days. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Predose, Cycle 3 Predose, Cycle 4 Predose, Cycle 5 Predose, Baseline Predose, Cycle 7 Predose on Day 1, Cycle 7 Day 7, Cycle 7 Day 14, Cycle 8 pre-dose on Day 1

Interventionmicrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 2 PredoseCycle 3 PredoseCycle 4 PredoseCycle 5 PredoseBaselineCycle 7 PredoseCycle 8 Predose
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)42.5388.92110.50100.2092.92141.44117.61

[back to top]

DLBCL: Plasma Concentrations of Rituximab

DLBCL participants received at least 1 infusion of rituximab and must have been able to receive at least 4 cycles of rituximab SC; therefore DLBCL participants could be enrolled at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5 and as a result the baseline PK sample could be collected at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5. Each Cycle is 21 days. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Predose, Cycle 3 Predose, Cycle 4 Predose, Cycle 5 Predose, Baseline Predose, Cycle 7 Predose on Day 1, Cycle 7 Day 7, Cycle 7 Day 14, Cycle 8 Predose on Day 1

Interventionmicrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 2 PredoseCycle 3 PredoseCycle 4 PredoseCycle 5 PredoseBaselineCycle 7 PredoseCycle 7 Day 7Cycle 7 Day 14Cycle 8 Predose
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)42.5388.92110.50100.2092.92141.44348.81226.40117.61

[back to top]

DLBCL: Plasma Concentrations During Different Scheduling of Rituximab SC R-CHOP-14 or R-CHOP-21

Plasma concentrations of rituximab in participants with DLBCL by chemotherapy regimen cyclophosphamide, oncovine (vincristine), doxorubicin, prednisone/prednisolone given every 14 days (R-CHOP-14) or cyclophosphamide, oncovine (vincristine), doxorubicin, prednisone/prednisolone given every 21 days (R-CHOP-21) in the PK) population.DLBCL participants received at least 1 infusion of rituximab and must have been able to receive at least 4 cycles of rituximab SC; therefore DLBCL participants could be enrolled at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5 and as a result the baseline PK sample could be collected at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5. Each Cycle is 21 days. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Predose, Cycle 3 Predose, Cycle 4 Predose, Cycle 5 Predose, Baseline Predose, Cycle 7 Predose on Day 1, Cycle 7 Day 7, Cycle 7 Day 14, Cycle 8 Predose on Day 1

Interventionmicrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 2 PredoseCycle 3 PredoseCycle 4 PredoseCycle 5 PredoseBaselineCycle 7 PredoseCycle 7 Day 7Cycle 7 Day 14Cycle 8 Predose
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) R-CHOP-2128.3788.92110.5094.0074.25150.13398.76272.50123.76

[back to top]

DLBCL: Plasma Concentrations During Different Scheduling of Rituximab SC R-CHOP-14 or R-CHOP-21

Plasma concentrations of rituximab in participants with DLBCL by chemotherapy regimen cyclophosphamide, oncovine (vincristine), doxorubicin, prednisone/prednisolone given every 14 days (R-CHOP-14) or cyclophosphamide, oncovine (vincristine), doxorubicin, prednisone/prednisolone given every 21 days (R-CHOP-21) in the PK) population.DLBCL participants received at least 1 infusion of rituximab and must have been able to receive at least 4 cycles of rituximab SC; therefore DLBCL participants could be enrolled at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5 and as a result the baseline PK sample could be collected at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5. Each Cycle is 21 days. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Predose, Cycle 3 Predose, Cycle 4 Predose, Cycle 5 Predose, Baseline Predose, Cycle 7 Predose on Day 1, Cycle 7 Day 7, Cycle 7 Day 14, Cycle 8 Predose on Day 1

Interventionmicrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 2 PredoseCycle 5 PredoseBaselineCycle 7 PredoseCycle 7 Day 7Cycle 7 Day 14Cycle 8 Predose
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) R-CHOP-14170.00125.00214.2593.5071.5542.0078.50

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to IWG Response Criteria

PFS was defined as the time from first dose of rituximab to the first occurrence of disease progression or relapse, according to the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria or other country standards, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to first occurrence of progression or relapse, or death, whichever occurs first (up to maximum 54 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)29.2
Follicular Lymphoma (FL)22.1
Subcutaneous (SC) Rituximab25.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from first dose of rituximab to death from any cause. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Day 1 until death (up to maximum 54 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)19.4
Follicular Lymphoma (FL)4.7
Subcutaneous (SC) Rituximab11.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Event-Free Survival (EFS) According to IWG Response Criteria

EFS was defined as the time from first dose of rituximab to first occurrence of progression or relapse, according to the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria or other country standards, or initiation of a non-protocol-specified anti-lymphoma therapy or death, whichever occurred first. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to first occurrence of progression or relapse, or initiation of a non-protocol-specified anti-lymphoma therapy or death, whichever occurs first (up to maximum 54 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)29.2
Follicular Lymphoma (FL)22.1
Subcutaneous (SC) Rituximab25.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease-Free Survival (DFS) According to IWG Response Criteria

DFS assessed in participants achieving complete response (CR) including complete response unconfirmed (Cru) and was defined as the period from 4 to 8 weeks after end of Induction period up to relapse or death from any cause, whichever occured first. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: From 4 to 8 weeks after end of Induction period up to relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to maximum 54 months) (end of Induction period = up to 8 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)21.7
Follicular Lymphoma (FL)25.6
Subcutaneous (SC) Rituximab23.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) According to IWG Response Criteria

Complete response required: 1) the complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy, and normalization of those biochemical abnormalities, 2) all lymph nodes and nodal masses had regressed to normal size, 3) the spleen, if considered to be enlarged before therapy on the basis of a CT scan, must have regressed in size and not be palpable on physical examination and 4) if the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma before treatment, the infiltrate was cleared on repeat bone marrow aspirate and biopsy of the same site. CR/unconfirmed (CRu) included those patients who fulfilled criteria 1 and 3 above as well as 1) a residual lymph node mass greater than 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that regressed by more than 75% in the SPD and 2) indeterminate bone marrow. Response was assessed according to the IWG response criteria. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: At 4 to 8 weeks after end of Induction period (end of Induction period = up to 8 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)65.2
Follicular Lymphoma (FL)67.9
Subcutaneous (SC) Rituximab66.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With At Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events

SAE was defined as any experience that suggested a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution, and fulfilled any of the following criteria: fatal (resulted in death), life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/ birth defect, was medically significant or required intervention to prevent any of the other outcomes listed here. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 54 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)36.1
Follicular Lymphoma (FL)26.7
Subcutaneous (SC) Rituximab31.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With At Least One Grade ≥ 3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event was therefore any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Pre-existing conditions which worsened during the study were also considered as adverse events. Grading was completed according to the CTCAE, version 4.0. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 54 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)51.4
Follicular Lymphoma (FL)43.0
Subcutaneous (SC) Rituximab46.8

[back to top] [back to top]

FL: Overall Geometric Least Square (LS) Mean Plasma Trough Concentrations of Rituximab

FL participants could be enrolled during induction or maintenance phase and they should have received at least 1 infusion of rituximab and must have been able to receive at least 4 cycles of rituximab SC if enrolled during induction or 4 cycles of rituximab SC if enrolled during maintenance. PK data only collected for participants enrolled during Induction. During the induction phase each Cycle is 21 days. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Induction collection: Cycle 2 Predose, Cycle 3 Predose, Cycle 4 Predose, Cycle 5 Predose, Baseline Predose, and Cycle 8 Predose on Day 1

Interventionmicrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Follicular Lymphoma (FL)61.01

[back to top]

DLBCL: Overall Geometric Least Square (LS) Mean Plasma Trough Concentrations of Rituximab

DLBCL participants received at least 1 infusion of rituximab and must have been able to receive at least 4 cycles of rituximab SC; therefore DLBCL participants could be enrolled at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5 and as a result the baseline PK sample could be collected at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5. Each Cycle is 21 days. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Predose, Cycle 3 Predose, Cycle 4 Predose, Cycle 5 Predose, Baseline Predose, Cycle 7 Predose on Day 1, Cycle 7 Day 7, Cycle 7 Day 14, Cycle 8 Predose on Day 1

Interventionmicrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)70.50

[back to top]

DLBCL: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Rituximab

DLBCL participants received at least 1 infusion of rituximab and must have been able to receive at least 4 cycles of rituximab SC; therefore DLBCL participants could be enrolled at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5 and as a result the baseline PK sample could be collected at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5. Each Cycle is 21 days. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Predose, Cycle 3 Predose, Cycle 4 Predose, Cycle 5 Predose, Baseline Predose, Cycle 7 Predose on Day 1, Cycle 7 Day 7, Cycle 7 Day 14, Cycle 8 Predose on Day 1

Interventionmicrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) (Mean)
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)NA

[back to top]

DLBCL: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Rituximab

DLBCL participants received at least 1 infusion of rituximab and must have been able to receive at least 4 cycles of rituximab SC; therefore DLBCL participants could be enrolled at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5 and as a result the baseline PK sample could be collected at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5. Each Cycle is 21 days. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Predose, Cycle 3 Predose, Cycle 4 Predose, Cycle 5 Predose, Baseline Predose, Cycle 7 Predose on Day 1, Cycle 7 Day 7, Cycle 7 Day 14, Cycle 8 Predose on Day 1

Interventionmcg*hr/mL (Mean)
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)NA

[back to top]

DLBCL: Apparent Total Clearance (CL/F) of Rituximab

DLBCL participants received at least 1 infusion of rituximab and must have been able to receive at least 4 cycles of rituximab SC; therefore DLBCL participants could be enrolled at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5 and as a result the baseline PK sample could be collected at Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, or Cycle 5. Each Cycle is 21 days. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Predose, Cycle 3 Predose, Cycle 4 Predose, Cycle 5 Predose, Baseline Predose, Cycle 7 Predose on Day 1, Cycle 7 Day 7, Cycle 7 Day 14, Cycle 8 Predose on Day 1

Interventionliter per hour (L/h) (Mean)
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)NA

[back to top]

Rituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) Convenience and Satisfaction Domain Scores

Patient-assessed satisfaction was evaluated using RASQ. Participants were asked questions regarding convenience and satisfaction for rituximab SC. Each domain is scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of more positive feelings toward therapy. The score for each domain was averaged among all participants. DLBCL participants could be enrolled at cycle 2, cycle 3, or cycle 4. FL participants could be enrolled during induction or maintenance phase and they should have received at least 1 infusion of rituximab and must be able to receive at least 4 cycles of rituximab SC if enrolled during induction or 4 cycles of rituximab SC if enrolled during maintenance. Each Cycle is 21 days for DLBCL. Each Cycle 21 days during the Induction phase and 2 months during Maintenance phase for FL. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: DLBCL: Cycle (C) 2, C3, C4, C5, C6, End of C8; FL: Induction: C3, C4, C5, C6, C8, Maintenance: C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C10, C12, End of treatment (4-8 weeks after last dose)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Convenience domain Cycle 3 InductionConvenience domain Cycle 4 InductionConvenience domain Cycle 5 InductionConvenience domain Cycle 6 InductionConvenience domain Cycle 8 InductionConvenience domain Cycle 2 MaintenanceConvenience domain Cycle 3 MaintenanceConvenience domain Cycle 4 MaintenanceConvenience domain Cycle 5 MaintenanceConvenience domain Cycle 6 MaintenanceConvenience domain Cycle 7 MaintenanceConvenience domain Cycle 8 MaintenanceConvenience domain Cycle 10 MaintenanceConvenience domain Cycle 12 MaintenanceConvenience domain End of TreatmentSatisfaction domain Cycle 3 InductionSatisfaction domain Cycle 4 InductionSatisfaction domain Cycle 5 InductionSatisfaction domain Cycle 6 InductionSatisfaction domain Cycle 8 InductionSatisfaction domain Cycle 2 MaintenanceSatisfaction domain Cycle 3 MaintenanceSatisfaction domain Cycle 4 MaintenanceSatisfaction domain Cycle 5 MaintenanceSatisfaction domain Cycle 6 MaintenanceSatisfaction domain Cycle 7 MaintenanceSatisfaction domain Cycle 8 MaintenanceSatisfaction domain Cycle 10 MaintenanceSatisfaction domain Cycle 12 MaintenanceSatisfaction domain End of Treatment
Follicular Lymphoma (FL)81.876.579.695.883.183.687.5100.080.283.382.793.891.786.375.089.484.191.793.891.392.079.2100.079.787.594.293.850.091.075.0

[back to top]

Rituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) Convenience and Satisfaction Domain Scores

Patient-assessed satisfaction was evaluated using RASQ. Participants were asked questions regarding convenience and satisfaction for rituximab SC. Each domain is scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of more positive feelings toward therapy. The score for each domain was averaged among all participants. DLBCL participants could be enrolled at cycle 2, cycle 3, or cycle 4. FL participants could be enrolled during induction or maintenance phase and they should have received at least 1 infusion of rituximab and must be able to receive at least 4 cycles of rituximab SC if enrolled during induction or 4 cycles of rituximab SC if enrolled during maintenance. Each Cycle is 21 days for DLBCL. Each Cycle 21 days during the Induction phase and 2 months during Maintenance phase for FL. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: DLBCL: Cycle (C) 2, C3, C4, C5, C6, End of C8; FL: Induction: C3, C4, C5, C6, C8, Maintenance: C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C10, C12, End of treatment (4-8 weeks after last dose)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Convenience domain Cycle 2 TreatmentConvenience domain Cycle 3 TreatmentConvenience domain Cycle 4 TreatmentConvenience domain Cycle 5 TreatmentConvenience domain Cycle 6 TreatmentConvenience domain Cycle 8 TreatmentSatisfaction domain Cycle 2 TreatmentSatisfaction domain Cycle 3 TreatmentSatisfaction domain Cycle 4 TreatmentSatisfaction domain Cycle 5 TreatmentSatisfaction domain Cycle 6 TreatmentSatisfaction domain Cycle 8 Treatment
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)75.081.982.183.380.883.887.583.385.683.384.691.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Administration-Associated Reactions (AAR)

AARs were defined as all adverse events (AEs) occurring within 24 hours of rituximab administration and which were considered related to study drug. AARs included infusion/injection-related reactions (IIRRs), injection-site reactions, administration site conditions and all symptoms thereof. Grading was completed according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. (NCT01889069)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 54 months

,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
At least One AARAt Least One AAR Grade ≥3Cutaneous and Soft Tissue AARs (Localized)Cutaneous and Soft Tissue AARs (Non-Localized)
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)4.201.42.8
Follicular Lymphoma (FL)8.108.10
Subcutaneous (SC) Rituximab6.305.11.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Particular Interest (AEPIs)

"The following AEs were defined as AEPIs: AEs with the preferred term Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), hepatitis B reactivation defined as AEs with preferred term containing Hepatitis B or hepatitis acute, thrombocytopenia defined via Roche MedDRA basket subgroup haematopoietic thrombocytopenia, second malignancies defined as AEs from the SOC Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified starting 6 months after the first study drug intake, second malignancies based on standardised MedDRA queries (SMQ) starting 6 months after the first study drug intake based on the MedDRA SMQ Malignant or unspecified tumours, in which benign neoplasms are not included, Cardiac events including AEs from the SOC Cardiac disorders, and hemorrhagic events defined via Roche MedDRA basket subgroup Haemorrhagic events. Reported are number of participants with total AEPIs and each of the AEPI categories." (NCT01905943)
Timeframe: Baseline up to time of primary completion (3 years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Total AEPIsThrombocytopeniaCardiac eventsSecond malignanciesSecond malignancies (SMQ)Hemorrhagic eventsHepatitis B reactivationPML
Obinutuzumab46731410982756931

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. AEs, including AEs of Special Interest and AEs of Particular Interest, were reported based on the national cancer institute common terminology criteria for AEs, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE, v4.0). Reported are the number of subjects with AEs, Grade 3-5 AEs, and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). (NCT01905943)
Timeframe: Baseline up to time of primary completion (3 years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEsGrade 3-5 AEsSAEs
Obinutuzumab950780516

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR) at Final Response Assessment (FRA)

OR: percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), or partial response (PR), as determined by the investigator based on International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) tumor response criteria. CR: Peripheral blood lymphocytes 4,000/mcL, no significant lymphadenopathy, no hepatomegaly and splenomegaly, no disease symptoms, blood counts: neutrophils >1,500/mcL, platelets > 100,000/mcL, hemoglobin > 110 g/L and bone marrow normocellular for age. Cri: CR with persistent cytopenia. PR: >/= 50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count AND >/= 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy OR >/= 50% reduction of liver enlargement OR >/= 50% reduction of spleen PLUS one of the following: neutrophils >1,500/mcL, platelets > 100,000/mcL, hemoglobin > 110 g/L OR >/= 50% increase in neutrophils, platelets or hemoglobin. (NCT01905943)
Timeframe: 3 months after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
G Mono: Previously Untreated Fit71.0
G Mono: Previously Untreated Unfit59.4
G Mono: Relapsed/Refractory41.5
G-Benda: Previously Untreated Fit83.9
G-Benda: Previously Untreated Unfit81.6
G-Benda: Relapsed/Refractory73.2
G-FC: Previously Untreated Fit90.0
G-FC: Previously Untreated Unfit84.6
G-FC: Relapsed/Refractory85.0
G-Clb: Previously Untreated Fit100
G-Clb: Previously Untreated Unfit82.1
G-Clb: Relapsed/Refractory56.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)

BOR was defined as the percentage of participants with the best response obtained throughout the trial with CR, CRi, or PR, as determined by the investigator based on IWCLL tumor response criteria. CR: Peripheral blood lymphocytes 4,000/mcL, no significant lymphadenopathy, no hepatomegaly and splenomegaly, no disease symptoms, blood counts: neutrophils >1,500/mcL, platelets > 100,000/mcL, hemoglobin > 110 g/L and bone marrow normocellular for age. Cri: CR with persistent cytopenia. PR: >/= 50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count AND >/= 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy OR >/= 50% reduction of liver enlargement OR >/= 50% reduction of spleen PLUS one of the following: neutrophils >1,500/mcL, platelets > 100,000/mcL, hemoglobin > 110 g/L OR >/= 50% increase in neutrophils, platelets or hemoglobin. (NCT01905943)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 85, end of treatment or early termination, and follow-up, assessed up to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
G Mono: Previously Untreated Fit83.9
G Mono: Previously Untreated Unfit71.9
G Mono: Relapsed/Refractory60.0
G-Benda: Previously Untreated Fit91.7
G-Benda: Previously Untreated Unfit93.9
G-Benda: Relapsed/Refractory86.8
G-FC: Previously Untreated Fit97.1
G-FC: Previously Untreated Unfit84.6
G-FC: Relapsed/Refractory97.5
G-Clb: Previously Untreated Fit100
G-Clb: Previously Untreated Unfit94.0
G-Clb: Relapsed/Refractory84.8

[back to top]

Median Time to Response (TTR)

Kaplan Meier estimate of median TTR was defined as the time at which half of the participants reached CR or PR based on IWCLL tumor response criteria. CR: Peripheral blood lymphocytes 4,000/mcL, no significant lymphadenopathy, no hepatomegaly and splenomegaly, no disease symptoms, blood counts: neutrophils >1,500/mcL, platelets > 100,000/mcL, hemoglobin > 110 g/L and bone marrow normocellular for age. PR: >/= 50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count AND >/= 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy OR >/= 50% reduction of liver enlargement OR >/= 50% reduction of spleen PLUS one of the following: neutrophils >1,500/mcL, platelets > 100,000/mcL, hemoglobin > 110 g/L OR >/= 50% increase in neutrophils, platelets or hemoglobin. (NCT01905943)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 85, end of treatment or early termination, and follow-up, assessed up to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
G Mono: Previously Untreated Fit3.6
G Mono: Previously Untreated Unfit3.6
G Mono: Relapsed/Refractory3.9
G-Benda: Previously Untreated Fit3.5
G-Benda: Previously Untreated Unfit3.5
G-Benda: Relapsed/Refractory3.7
G-FC: Previously Untreated Fit3.6
G-FC: Previously Untreated Unfit4.1
G-FC: Relapsed/Refractory3.6
G-Clb: Previously Untreated Fit3.3
G-Clb: Previously Untreated Unfit3.6
G-Clb: Relapsed/Refractory3.7

[back to top]

Median Time to Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Kaplan Meier estimate of the median PFS was defined as the time at which half of the participants have progressed (progressive disease [PD]) based on IWCLL tumor response criteria or died from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: at least one of the following: >/= 50% increase in the absolute number of circulating lymphocytes to at least 5,000/mcL, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes, >/= 50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, >/= 50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, transformation to more aggressive histology, progression of any cytopenia, decrease of hemoglobin levels by more than 20 g/L or to less than 100 g/L, decrease of platelet counts by more than 50% or to less than 100,000 /mcL, decrease of neutrophil counts by more than 50% or to less than 1,000/mcL. (NCT01905943)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 85, end of treatment or early termination, and follow-up, assessed up to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
G Mono: Previously Untreated Fit43.0
G Mono: Previously Untreated Unfit21.2
G Mono: Relapsed/Refractory17.6
G-Benda: Previously Untreated Fit58.0
G-Benda: Previously Untreated UnfitNA
G-Benda: Relapsed/Refractory28.6
G-FC: Previously Untreated FitNA
G-FC: Previously Untreated UnfitNA
G-FC: Relapsed/Refractory24.8
G-Clb: Previously Untreated Fit31.3
G-Clb: Previously Untreated Unfit31.8
G-Clb: Relapsed/Refractory14.1

[back to top]

Median Time to New Anti-Leukemia Therapy (TTNT)

Kaplan Meier estimate of median TTNT was defined as the time at which half of the participants have initiated a new anti-leukemic therapy. (NCT01905943)
Timeframe: Baseline until end of study (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
G Mono: Previously Untreated FitNA
G Mono: Previously Untreated UnfitNA
G Mono: Relapsed/Refractory22.5
G-Benda: Previously Untreated FitNA
G-Benda: Previously Untreated UnfitNA
G-Benda: Relapsed/Refractory38.3
G-FC: Previously Untreated FitNA
G-FC: Previously Untreated UnfitNA
G-FC: Relapsed/Refractory32.6
G-Clb: Previously Untreated FitNA
G-Clb: Previously Untreated Unfit53.7
G-Clb: Relapsed/Refractory20.4

[back to top]

Median Time to Event-Free Survival (EFS)

Kaplan Meier estimate of median EFS is the time at which half of the participants have progressed as assessed by investigator based on IWCLL tumor response criteria, or have initiated a non-protocol-specified anti-leukemia therapy or died, whichever occurs first. PD: at least 1 of the following: >/= 50% increase in absolute number of circulating lymphocytes to at least 5,000/mcL, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes, >/= 50% increase in longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, >/= 50% increase in enlargement of liver and/or spleen, transformation to more aggressive histology, progression of any cytopenia, decrease of hemoglobin levels by more than 20 g/L or to less than 100 g/L, decrease of platelet counts by more than 50% or to less than 100,000 /mcL, decrease of neutrophil counts by more than 50% or to less than 1,000/mcL. (NCT01905943)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 85, end of treatment or early termination, and follow-up, assessed up to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
G Mono: Previously Untreated Fit35.2
G Mono: Previously Untreated Unfit17.9
G Mono: Relapsed/Refractory14.0
G-Benda: Previously Untreated Fit58.0
G-Benda: Previously Untreated Unfit52.9
G-Benda: Relapsed/Refractory25.1
G-FC: Previously Untreated FitNA
G-FC: Previously Untreated UnfitNA
G-FC: Relapsed/Refractory24.2
G-Clb: Previously Untreated Fit31.3
G-Clb: Previously Untreated Unfit31.8
G-Clb: Relapsed/Refractory13.7

[back to top]

Median Time to Duration of Response (DoR)

Kaplan Meier estimate of median DoR was defined as the time at which half of the responding (PR or CR) participants had progressed (PD) or died from any cause, whichever occurred first. PR: >/= 50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count AND >/= 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy OR >/= 50% reduction of liver enlargement OR >/= 50% reduction of spleen PLUS one of the following: neutrophils >1,500/mcL, platelets > 100,000/mcL, hemoglobin > 110 g/L OR >/= 50% increase in neutrophils, platelets or hemoglobin. CR: Peripheral blood lymphocytes 4,000/mcL, no significant lymphadenopathy, no hepatomegaly and splenomegaly, no disease symptoms, blood counts: neutrophils >1,500/mcL, platelets > 100,000/mcL, hemoglobin > 110 g/L and bone marrow normocellular for age. PD: as defined in the description for Event-Free Survival outcome measure. (NCT01905943)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 85, end of treatment or early termination, and follow-up, assessed up to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
G Mono: Previously Untreated Fit40.1
G Mono: Previously Untreated Unfit20.1
G Mono: Relapsed/Refractory15.0
G-Benda: Previously Untreated Fit55.0
G-Benda: Previously Untreated Unfit49.3
G-Benda: Relapsed/Refractory25.5
G-FC: Previously Untreated FitNA
G-FC: Previously Untreated UnfitNA
G-FC: Relapsed/Refractory21.2
G-Clb: Previously Untreated Fit28.1
G-Clb: Previously Untreated Unfit28.1
G-Clb: Relapsed/Refractory12.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negativity as Assessed by Flow Cytometry

MRD-negativity was defined as the presence of less than 1 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cell per 10,000 leukocytes in blood and bone marrow as assessed by flow cytometry 3 months after last dose of study treatment (i.e. at final response assessment [FRA] visit). (NCT01905943)
Timeframe: 3 months after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)

,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
BloodBone Marrow
G Mono: Previously Untreated Fit8.34.2
G Mono: Previously Untreated Unfit23.13.8
G Mono: Relapsed/Refractory4.12.0
G-Benda: Previously Untreated Fit63.131.5
G-Benda: Previously Untreated Unfit65.327.2
G-Benda: Relapsed/Refractory39.814.9
G-Clb: Previously Untreated Unfit9.45.7
G-Clb: Relapsed/Refractory6.33.1
G-FC: Previously Untreated Fit72.040.0
G-FC: Previously Untreated Unfit58.341.7
G-FC: Relapsed/Refractory51.524.2

[back to top]

Median Time to Overall Survival (OS)

Kaplan Meier estimate of median OS was defined as the time at which half of the participants had died, regardless of the cause of death. (NCT01905943)
Timeframe: Baseline until death (Approximately up to 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
G Mono: Previously Untreated FitNA
G Mono: Previously Untreated UnfitNA
G Mono: Relapsed/RefractoryNA
G-Benda: Previously Untreated FitNA
G-Benda: Previously Untreated UnfitNA
G-Benda: Relapsed/RefractoryNA
G-FC: Previously Untreated FitNA
G-FC: Previously Untreated UnfitNA
G-FC: Relapsed/RefractoryNA
G-Clb: Previously Untreated FitNA
G-Clb: Previously Untreated UnfitNA
G-Clb: Relapsed/RefractoryNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

"The following AEs were defined as AESIs: AEs with the preferred term Tumour Lysis Syndrome (TLS), Infusion-Related Reactions (IRRs) defined as AEs that occurred during or within 24 hours of the completion of obinutuzumab infusion and were assessed as related to obinutuzumab by the Investigator, Infections defined as AEs from System Organ Class (SOC) Infections and infestations and AEs with the preferred term Neutropenia. Reported are number of participants with total AESIs, IRRs, Infections, Neutropenia and TLS." (NCT01905943)
Timeframe: Baseline up to time of primary completion (3 years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Total AESIsIRRsNeutropeniaInfectionsTLS
Obinutuzumab90563559952162

[back to top]

Primary Analysis: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Number of participants with TEAEs were reported. Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. TEAEs were defined as adverse events with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment up to and including 30 days after date of last dose of study medication. (NCT01974440)
Timeframe: Up to 8 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo + Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)197
Ibrutinib + CIT199

[back to top]

Primary Analysis: Complete Response Rate (CRR): Stratified Analysis

CRR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR); (based on investigator assessment) on or prior to the initiation of subsequent antilymphoma therapy. Criteria for CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; mass of any size permitted if positron emission tomography (PET) negative; regression to normal size on CT; spleen and liver: not palpable, nodules disappeared; bone marrow: infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy and no new sites of disease detected during assessment. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. Stratification factors were used for the analysis. (NCT01974440)
Timeframe: Up to 8 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)50.2
Ibrutinib + CIT55

[back to top]

Primary Analysis: Duration of Response (DOR): Stratified Analysis

DOR was defined as the interval (in months) between the date of initial documentation of response (CR or PR) and the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (or relapse for participants who experienced CR during the study) or death, whichever occurred first. Criteria for CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; mass of any size permitted if PET negative; regression to normal size on CT; spleen and liver: not palpable, nodules disappeared; bone marrow: infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy and no new sites of disease detected during assessment. Criteria for PR: >=50% decrease in sum of the diameter of all target lesions compared with baseline, in absence of new lesions or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. Stratification factors were used for the analysis. (NCT01974440)
Timeframe: Up to 8 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)21.68
Ibrutinib + CIT44.32

[back to top]

Supplementary Analysis: Progression Free Survival: Unstratified Analysis - Participants With Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL)

PFS in MZL participants was defined as duration (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or relapse from CR or death, whichever was first reported. PFS was assessed by the investigator based on the 2007 Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Disease progression was defined as any new lesion or increase by >=50% of previously involved sites from nadir disease progression criteria: Appearance of new nodal lesion 1.5 cm in any axis, 50% increase in SPD of >1 node or 50% increase in longest diameter of previously identified node 1 cm in short axis. Participants who were progression-free and alive or had unknown status were censored at the last tumor assessment. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. For this outcome measure, unstratified analysis was performed on participants with MZL. (NCT01974440)
Timeframe: Up to 8 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)91.63
Ibrutinib + CITNA

[back to top]

Primary Analysis: Overall Response Rate (ORR): Stratified Analysis

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a CR or partial response (PR). Criteria for CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; mass of any size permitted if PET negative; regression to normal size on CT; spleen and liver: not palpable, nodules disappeared; bone marrow: infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy and no new sites of disease detected during assessment. Criteria for PR: >=50% decrease in sum of the diameter of all target lesions compared with baseline, in absence of new lesions or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. Stratification factors were used for the analysis. (NCT01974440)
Timeframe: Up to 8 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)90.5
Ibrutinib + CIT91.6

[back to top]

Primary Analysis: Overall Survival (OS): Stratified Analysis

OS was defined as the interval (in months) between the date of randomization and the date of the participant's death due to any cause. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. Stratification factors were used for the analysis. (NCT01974440)
Timeframe: Up to 8 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)NA
Ibrutinib + CITNA

[back to top]

Primary Analysis: Progression Free Survival (PFS): Stratified Analysis

PFS was defined as duration (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or relapse from complete response (CR) or death, whichever was first reported. PFS was assessed by the investigator based on the 2007 Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Disease progression was defined as any new lesion or increase by greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) of previously involved sites from nadir disease progression criteria: Appearance of new nodal lesion 1.5 centimeters (cm) in any axis, 50% increase in sum of product of diameters (SPD) of greater than (>) 1 node or 50% increase in longest diameter of previously identified node 1 cm in short axis. Participants who were progression-free and alive or had unknown status were censored at the last tumor assessment. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. Stratification factors were used for the analysis. (NCT01974440)
Timeframe: Up to 8 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)23.75
Ibrutinib + CIT40.51

[back to top]

Primary Analysis: Time to Worsening (TTW) in the Lymphoma (Lym) Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma Subscale (FACT-LymS) Questionnaire

Time-to-worsening in the Lymphoma subscale of the FACT-Lym was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the start date of the worsening of participant symptoms. Worsening was defined by a 5-point decrease from baseline in participant symptoms. FACT-Lym Lymphoma subscale contains 15 questions, scores from 0 to 4 for each question (0 = not at all, 1 = a little bit, 2 = some what, 3 = quite a bit and 4 = very much, where the higher score indicated worse condition). Lymphoma subscale score is the total of reverse scores, range 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life. (NCT01974440)
Timeframe: Up to 8 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)37.03
Ibrutinib + CIT24.84

[back to top]

Supplementary Analysis: Duration of Response: Unstratified Analysis - Participants With MZL

DOR in MZL participants was defined as the interval (in months) between the date of initial documentation of response (CR or PR) and the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (or relapse for participants who experienced CR during the study) or death, whichever occurred first. Criteria for CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; mass of any size permitted if PET negative; regression to normal size on CT; spleen and liver: not palpable, nodules disappeared; bone marrow: infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy and no new sites of disease detected during assessment. Criteria for PR: >=50% decrease in sum of the diameter of all target lesions compared with baseline, in absence of new lesions or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. For this outcome measure, unstratified analysis was performed on participants with MZL. (NCT01974440)
Timeframe: Up to 8 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)89.17
Ibrutinib + CITNA

[back to top]

Supplementary Analysis: Number of Participants With TEAEs: Participants With MZL

Number of MZL participants with TEAEs were reported. AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. TEAEs were defined as adverse events with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment up to and including 30 days after date of last dose of study medication. (NCT01974440)
Timeframe: Up to 8 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo + Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)28
Ibrutinib + CIT28

[back to top]

Supplementary Analysis: Overall Response Rate: Unstratified Analysis - Participants With MZL

ORR in MZL participants was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a CR or PR. Criteria for CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; mass of any size permitted if PET negative; regression to normal size on CT; spleen and liver: not palpable, nodules disappeared; bone marrow: infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy and no new sites of disease detected during assessment. Criteria for PR: >=50% decrease in sum of the diameter of all target lesions compared with baseline, in absence of new lesions or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. For this outcome measure, unstratified analysis was performed on participants with MZL. (NCT01974440)
Timeframe: Up to 8 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)82.1
Ibrutinib + CIT89.3

[back to top]

Supplementary Analysis: Overall Survival: Unstratified Analysis - Participants With MZL

OS in MZL participants was defined as the interval (in months) between the date of randomization and the date of the participant's death due to any cause. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. For this outcome measure, unstratified analysis was performed on participants with MZL. (NCT01974440)
Timeframe: Up to 8 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)NA
Ibrutinib + CITNA

[back to top]

Supplementary Analysis: Time to Worsening (TTW) in the Lymphoma (Lym) Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma Subscale (FACT-LymS) Questionnaire: Participants With MZL

TTW in MZL participants in the Lymphoma subscale of the FACT-Lym was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the start date of the worsening of participant symptoms. Worsening was defined by a 5-point decrease from baseline in participant symptoms. FACT-Lym Lymphoma subscale contains 15 questions, scores from 0 to 4 for each question (0 = not at all, 1 = a little bit, 2 = some what, 3 = quite a bit and 4 = very much, where the higher score indicated worse condition). Lymphoma subscale score is the total of reverse scores, range 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life. (NCT01974440)
Timeframe: Up to 8 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)36.83
Ibrutinib + CIT58.91

[back to top]

Supplementary Analysis: Complete Response Rate: Unstratified Analysis - Participants With MZL

CRR in MZL participants was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a CR (based on investigator assessment) on or prior to the initiation of subsequent antilymphoma therapy. Criteria for CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; mass of any size permitted if PET negative; regression to normal size on CT; spleen and liver: not palpable, nodules disappeared; bone marrow: infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy and no new sites of disease detected during assessment. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. For this outcome measure, unstratified analysis was performed on participants with MZL. (NCT01974440)
Timeframe: Up to 8 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)60.7
Ibrutinib + CIT64.3

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the interval from randomization to the first documentation of definitive disease progression or death from any cause. Definitive disease progression is CLL progression based on standard criteria, excluding lymphocytosis alone. PFS was to be assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). (NCT01980888)
Timeframe: Up to 22 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Idelalisib+Bendamustine+RituximabNA
Placebo+Bendamustine+RituximabNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by the Investigator Using Standard iwCLL Guidelines in Participants With 17p Deletion as Identified by Fluorescence In-situ Hybridization (FISH) Test

Assessment of response was performed by the investigator according to the iwCLL guidelines. PD was defined as occurrence of one of the following events: appearance of any new extra nodal lesion; new palpable lymph node (>1.5 cm); unequivocal progression of non-target lesion; an increase of >/=50% compared to baseline in splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, number of blood lymphocytes with lymphocyte count >/=5000/mcL, or in longest diameter of any extra nodal lesion; transformation to a more aggressive histology; decrease of >/=50% compared to baseline in platelet or neutrophil count; or decrease in hemoglobin level by >2 g/dL or to <10 g/dL. Percentages are rounded off. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8 years 5 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine + Rituximab 17p Del. Population80.4
Venetoclax + Rituximab 17p Del. Population80.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) Using Standard iwCLL Guidelines

Assessment of response was performed by the IRC according to the iwCLL guidelines. PD was defined as occurrence of one of the following events: appearance of any new extra nodal lesion; new palpable lymph node (>1.5 cm); unequivocal progression of non-target lesion; an increase of >/=50% compared to baseline in splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, number of blood lymphocytes with lymphocyte count >/=5000/mcL, or in longest diameter of any extra nodal lesion; transformation to a more aggressive histology; decrease of >/=50% compared to baseline in platelet or neutrophil count; or decrease in hemoglobin level by >2 g/dL or to <10 g/dL. No new IRC data was generated post the primary analysis. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study54.4
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study18.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With PD as Assessed by the Investigator Using Standard International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) Guidelines or Death

Assessment of response was performed by the investigator according to the iwCLL guidelines. PD was defined as occurrence of one of the following events: appearance of any new extra nodal lesion; new palpable lymph node (greater than [>] 1.5 centimeters [cm]); unequivocal progression of non-target lesion; an increase of greater than or equal to (>/=) 50 percent (%) compared to baseline in splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, number of blood lymphocytes with lymphocyte count >/=5000 per microliter (mcL), or in longest diameter of any extra nodal lesion; transformation to a more aggressive histology; decrease of >/=50% compared to baseline in platelet or neutrophil count; or decrease in hemoglobin level by >2 grams per deciliter (g/dL) or to less than [<] 10 g/dL. Percentages are rounded off. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8 years 5 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study88.7
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study70.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response of CR, Cri, nPR, or PR at End of Combination Treatment Visit as Assessed by the IRC Using iwCLL Guidelines

Response was assessed by the IRC according to the iwCLL guidelines and was confirmed by repeat assessment >/=4 weeks after initial documentation. CR: peripheral blood lymphocytes <4000/mcL; absence of any new lesion, nodal disease, lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500/mcL, platelets >100000/mcL, hemoglobin >11.0 g/dL without need for transfusion or exogenous growth factors; normocellular bone marrow with <30% lymphocytes; no lymphoid nodules. CRi: fulfilling all CR criteria but persistent cytopenia. PR: >/=50% reduction in two of the following: peripheral blood lymphocytes, lymphadenopathy, spleen and/or liver enlargement; and one of the following: neutrophils >1500/mcL, platelets >100000/mcL, hemoglobin >11.0 g/dL or >/=50% improvement without need for transfusion or exogenous growth factors. nPR: fulfilling all CR criteria but presence of lymphoid nodules. The 95% CI was computed using Pearson-Clopper method. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: EoCTR visit (8 to 12 weeks after C6D1); Cycle length = 28 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study62.6
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study87.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response of CR, Cri, nPR, or PR at End of Combination Treatment Visit as Assessed by the Investigator Using iwCLL Guidelines

Response was assessed by investigator according to iwCLL guidelines and was confirmed by repeat assessment >/=4 weeks after initial documentation. CR: peripheral blood lymphocytes <4000/mcL; absence of any new lesion, nodal disease, lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500/mcL, platelets >100000/mcL, hemoglobin >11.0 g/dL without need for transfusion or exogenous growth factors; normocellular bone marrow with <30% lymphocytes; no lymphoid nodules. CRi: fulfilling all CR criteria but persistent cytopenia. PR: >/=50% reduction in 2 of following: peripheral blood lymphocytes, lymphadenopathy, spleen and/or liver enlargement; and 1 of following: neutrophils >1500/mcL, platelets >100000/mcL, hemoglobin >11.0 g/dL or >/=50% improvement without need for transfusion or exogenous growth factors. nPR: fulfilling all CR criteria but presence of lymphoid nodules. 95% CI was computed using Pearson-Clopper method. Percentages are rounded off. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: End of combination treatment response (EoCTR) visit (8 to 12 weeks after Cycle [C] 6 Day [1]); Cycle length = 28 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study63.1
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study88.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With MRD Negativity in Bone Marrow

MRD-negativity was defined as the presence of <1 malignant B-cell per 10000 normal B-cells in a sample of at least 200000 B-cells, as assessed flow cytometry technique. Percentage of participants with MRD-negativity was reported. The 95% CI was computed using Pearson-Clopper method. Percentages are rounded off. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: EoCTR visit (8 to 12 weeks after C6D1); Cycle length = 28 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study1.0
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study14.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity in Peripheral Blood

MRD-negativity was defined as the presence of <1 malignant B-cell per 10000 normal B-cells in a sample of at least 200000 B-cells, as assessed by the allele specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction (ASO-PCR) and/or flow cytometry technique. Percentage of participants with MRD-negativity was reported. The 95% CI was computed using Pearson-Clopper method. Percentage is rounded off. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: EoCTR visit (8 to 12 weeks after C6D1); Cycle length = 28 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study13.3
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study62.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response of CR, CRi, nPR, or PR as Assessed by the IRC Using iwCLL Guidelines

Response was assessed by IRC according to iwCLL guidelines and was confirmed by repeat assessment >/=4 weeks after initial documentation. CR: peripheral blood lymphocytes <4000/mcL; absence of any new lesion, nodal disease, lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500/mcL, platelets >100000/mcL, hemoglobin >11.0 g/dL without need for transfusion or exogenous growth factors; normocellular bone marrow with <30% lymphocytes; no lymphoid nodules. CRi: fulfilling all CR criteria but persistent cytopenia. PR: >/=50% reduction in 2 of following: peripheral blood lymphocytes, lymphadenopathy, spleen and/or liver enlargement; 1 of following: neutrophils >1500/mcL, platelets >100000/mcL, hemoglobin >11.0 g/dL or >/=50% improvement without need for transfusion or exogenous growth factors. nPR: fulfilling all CR criteria but presence of lymphoid nodules. 95% CI was computed using Pearson-Clopper method.No new IRC data was generated post primary analysis. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to last FUV (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study67.7
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study93.3

[back to top]

Duration of Responses (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator Using iwCLL Guidelines

DOR was defined as the time from first occurrence of a documented response of CR, CRi, nPR, or PR until PD/relapse, as assessed by the investigator according to the iwCLL guidelines, or death from any cause. PD: occurrence of one of the following: new lesion; new palpable lymph node (>1.5 cm); unequivocal progression of non-target lesion; increase of >/=50% in splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, blood lymphocytes with count >/=5000/mcL, longest diameter of any lesion; transformation to more aggressive histology; decrease of >/=50% in platelet or neutrophil count, or hemoglobin level by >2 g/dL or to <10 g/dL. Participants without PD or death after response were censored at the last date of adequate response assessment. The median DOR was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and the 95% CI was computed using method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. CR, CRi, nPR, and PR have been defined in previous outcomes, and are not repeated here due to space constraint. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: From time of achieving best overall response until PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8 years 5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study19.1
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study53.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Died

Percentage of participants who died from any cause, during the study, was reported. Percentage is rounded off. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 8 years 5 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study43.1
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study30.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Participants alive at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive as documented by the investigator. The median OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and the 95% CI was computed using method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 8 years 5 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study87.8
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main StudyNA

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Using iwCLL Guidelines

EFS was defined as the time from date of randomization until the date of PD/relapse, start of a new non-protocol-specified anti-CLL therapy, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, as assessed by the investigator. PD: occurrence of one of the following: new lesion; new palpable lymph node (>1.5 cm); unequivocal progression of non-target lesion; increase of >/=50% in splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, blood lymphocytes with count >/=5000/mcL, longest diameter of any lesion; transformation to more aggressive histology; decrease of >/=50% in platelet or neutrophil count, or hemoglobin level by >2 g/dL or to <10 g/dL. Participants without any of the specified event at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last adequate response assessment. In case of no post-baseline response assessment, participants were censored at the randomization date. The median EFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and the 95% CI was computed using method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to PD/relapse, start of a new anti-CLL therapy, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (approximately 8 years 5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study16.4
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study53.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With PD or Death Among Participants With Best Overall Response of CR, CRi, nPR, or PR as Assessed by the Investigator Using iwCLL Guidelines

Percentage of participants with PD as assessed by the investigator according to the iwCLL guidelines or death from any cause during the study was reported. PD was defined as occurrence of one of the following events: appearance of any new extra nodal lesion; new palpable lymph node (>1.5 cm); unequivocal progression of non-target lesion; an increase of >/=50% compared to baseline in splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, number of blood lymphocytes with lymphocyte count >/=5000/mcL, or in longest diameter of any extra nodal lesion; transformation to a more aggressive histology; decrease of >/=50% compared to baseline in platelet or neutrophil count; or decrease in hemoglobin level by >2 g/dL or to <10 g/dL. CR, CRi, nPR, and PR have been defined in previous outcomes, and are not repeated here due to space constraint. Percentage is rounded off. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: From time of achieving best overall response until PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8 years 5 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study95.5
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study68.5

[back to top]

Time to New Anti-CLL Treatment (TTNT) as Assessed by the Investigator

TTNT was defined as the time from randomization until start of new non-protocol-specified anti-CLL treatment or death from any cause. Participants without the event at the time of analysis were censored at the last visit date for this outcome measure analysis. The median TTNT was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and the 95% CI was computed using method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to start of new ani-CLL therapy or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8 years 5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study24.0
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study63.0

[back to top]

Plasma Venetoclax Concentrations

(NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour, anytime before venetoclax administration) and 4 hours post-dose on D1 of Cycles 1 and 4; Cycle length = 28 days

Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Mean)
C1D1, Pre-doseC1D1, 4 hours Post-DoseC4D1, Pre-doseC4D1, 4 hours Post-Dose
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study0.6261.340.6811.34

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), CR With Incomplete Bone Marrow Recovery (CRi), Nodular Partial Response (nPR), or Partial Response (PR) as Assessed by the Investigator Using iwCLL Guidelines

Response was assessed by investigator according to iwCLL guidelines and was confirmed by repeat assessment >/=4 weeks after initial documentation. CR: peripheral blood lymphocytes <4000/mcL; absence of any new lesion, nodal disease, lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500/mcL, platelets >100000/mcL, hemoglobin >11.0 g/dL without need for transfusion or exogenous growth factors; normocellular bone marrow with <30% lymphocytes; no lymphoid nodules. CRi: fulfilling all CR criteria but persistent cytopenia. PR: >/=50% reduction in two of following: peripheral blood lymphocytes, lymphadenopathy, spleen and/or liver enlargement; and 1 of following: neutrophils >1500/mcL, platelets >100000/mcL, hemoglobin >11.0 g/dL or >/=50% improvement without need for transfusion or exogenous growth factors. nPR: fulfilling all CR criteria but presence of lymphoid nodules. 95% CI was computed using Pearson-Clopper method.Percentages are rounded off. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 8 years 5 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CRCRinPRPR
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study8.20.56.252.8
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study26.31.53.661.9

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with Mircera and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with Mircera. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect that is fatal or life threatening; requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is medically significant or requires intervention to prevent one or other of the outcomes listed above. AEs were assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE, v4.0) (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: From signing of informed consent form up to approximately 8 years 5 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Adverse EventsSerious Adverse Events
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study18584
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study194101

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Monroe Dunaway (MD) Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) Core Symptom Severity, Module Symptom Severity, and Interference Scores

MDASI is a 25-item validated questionnaire consisting of 2 parts. Part 1: 19-items divided into 2 scales, Core Symptom Severity (average of Questions 1 to 13; total 13 items: pain, fatigue, nausea, disturbed sleep, distress, shortness of breath, remembering things, lack of appetite, drowsiness, dry mouth, sadness, vomiting, and numbness) and Module Symptom Severity (average of Questions 14 to 19; total 6 items: night sweats, fevers and chills, lymph node swelling, diarrhea, bruising easy or bleeding, and constipation). Part 2: 6-items to assess Interference (symptom distress) (average of Questions 20 to 25; total 6 items: general activity, walking, work, mood, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life). Each item was rated from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating better outcome. Total score for Core Symptom Severity, Module Symptom Severity, and Interference are reported which range from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating better health-related quality of life (HRQoL). (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycles 1, 2, and 3; Cycle length = 28 days

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline; Mean core symptom severityChange at C1D1; Mean core symptom severityChange at C1D8; Mean core symptom severityChange at C1D15; Mean core symptom severityChange at C2D1; Mean core symptom severityChange at C2D8; Mean core symptom severityChange at C2D15; Mean core symptom severityChange at C3D1; Mean core symptom severityChange at C3D8; Mean core symptom severityChange at C3D15; Mean core symptom severityBaseline; Mean module symptom severityChange at C1D1; Mean module symptom severityChange at C1D8; Mean module symptom severityChange at C1D15; Mean module symptom severityChange at C2D1; Mean module symptom severityChange at C2D8; Mean module symptom severityChange at C2D15; Mean module symptom severityChange at C3D1; Mean module symptom severityChange at C3D8; Mean module symptom severityChange at C3D15; Mean module symptom severityBaseline; Mean interferenceChange at C1D1; Mean interferenceChange at C1D8; Mean interferenceChange at C1D15; Mean interferenceChange at C2D1; Mean interferenceChange at C2D8; Mean interferenceChange at C2D15; Mean interferenceChange at C3D1; Mean interferenceChange at C3D8; Mean interferenceChange at C3D15; Mean interference
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study1.760.000.260.00-0.230.17-0.13-0.26-0.13-0.421.600.00-0.22-0.43-0.49-0.46-0.69-0.65-0.51-0.831.810.000.450.360.010.580.06-0.020.15-0.07
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study1.55-0.08-0.30-0.27-0.33-0.45-0.53-0.40-0.66-0.531.57-0.19-0.53-0.73-0.65-0.77-0.94-0.81-0.83-0.921.90-0.13-0.290.01-0.34-0.58-0.64-0.73-0.82-0.55

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HRQoL as Measured by Quality of Life Questionnaire Associated CLL Module (QLQ-CLL16) Multi-Item Scales Score

The EORTC QLQ-CLL16 module is designed for participants with Stage 0 to Stage 4 CLL. It is composed of 16 questions and there are four multi-item scales on Fatigue (2 items), Treatment-related side effects (TRSE, 4 items), Disease-related symptoms (DRS, 4 items), and Infection (4 items); and two single-item scales on social activities and future health worries. Multi-item scales score are reported and the total score for each multi-item scale was transformed to result in a total score range of 0 to 100, where higher score = poor HRQoL. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline, D1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, STC/EW visit (up to C6D28), EoCTR visit (8 to 12 weeks after C6D1), and FUVs (every 12 weeks after EoCTR up to 3 years); Cycle length = 28 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline; TRSEChange at C1D1; TRSEChange at C2D1; TRSEChange at C3D1; TRSEChange at C4D1; TRSEChange at C5D1; TRSEChange at C6D1; TRSEChange at STC/EW; TRSEChange at EoCTR; TRSEChange at FUV1; TRSEChange at FUV2; TRSEChange at FUV3; TRSEChange at FUV4; TRSEChange at FUV5; TRSEChange at FUV6; TRSEChange at FUV7; TRSEChange at FUV8; TRSEChange at FUV9; TRSEBaseline; DRSChange at C1D1; DRSChange at C2D1; DRSChange at C3D1; DRSChange at C4D1; DRSChange at C5D1; DRSChange at C6D1; DRSChange at STC/EW; DRSChange at EoCTR; DRSChange at FUV1; DRSChange at FUV2; DRSChange at FUV3; DRSChange at FUV4; DRSChange at FUV5; DRSChange at FUV6; DRSChange at FUV7; DRSChange at FUV8; DRSChange at FUV9; DRSBaseline; FatigueChange at C1D1; FatigueChange at C2D1; FatigueChange at C3D1; FatigueChange at C4D1; FatigueChange at C5D1; FatigueChange at C6D1; FatigueChange at STC/EW; FatigueChange at EoCTR; FatigueChange at FUV1; FatigueChange at FUV2; FatigueChange at FUV3; FatigueChange at FUV4; FatigueChange at FUV5; FatigueChange at FUV6; FatigueChange at FUV7; FatigueChange at FUV8; FatigueChange at FUV9; FatigueBaseline; InfectionChange at C1D1; InfectionChange at C2D1; InfectionChange at C3D1; InfectionChange at C4D1; InfectionChange at C5D1; InfectionChange at C6D1; InfectionChange at STC/EW; InfectionChange at EoCTR; InfectionChange at FUV1; InfectionChange at FUV2; InfectionChange at FUV3; InfectionChange at FUV4; InfectionChange at FUV5; InfectionChange at FUV6; InfectionChange at FUV7; InfectionChange at FUV8; InfectionChange at FUV9; Infection
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study14.290.01.62-0.26-0.49-0.510.460.81-0.88-1.20-1.70-2.08-1.97-2.68-1.012.561.678.3319.570.0-3.33-4.77-6.03-5.90-6.40-5.80-6.57-6.55-8.63-7.37-8.55-8.33-6.31-15.38-10.00-4.1728.760.0-2.55-2.83-3.18-2.38-2.66-3.11-6.69-6.37-6.64-5.79-9.65-6.55-5.05-10.26-6.67-8.3315.920.0-0.02-1.66-1.44-1.91-1.09-0.12-0.551.080.05-1.90-4.24-4.51-1.60-0.438.89-2.78

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HRQoL as Measured by Quality of Life Questionnaire Associated CLL Module (QLQ-CLL16) Multi-Item Scales Score

The EORTC QLQ-CLL16 module is designed for participants with Stage 0 to Stage 4 CLL. It is composed of 16 questions and there are four multi-item scales on Fatigue (2 items), Treatment-related side effects (TRSE, 4 items), Disease-related symptoms (DRS, 4 items), and Infection (4 items); and two single-item scales on social activities and future health worries. Multi-item scales score are reported and the total score for each multi-item scale was transformed to result in a total score range of 0 to 100, where higher score = poor HRQoL. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline, D1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, STC/EW visit (up to C6D28), EoCTR visit (8 to 12 weeks after C6D1), and FUVs (every 12 weeks after EoCTR up to 3 years); Cycle length = 28 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline; TRSEChange at C1D1; TRSEChange at C2D1; TRSEChange at C3D1; TRSEChange at C4D1; TRSEChange at C5D1; TRSEChange at C6D1; TRSEChange at STC/EW; TRSEChange at EoCTR; TRSEChange at FUV1; TRSEChange at FUV2; TRSEChange at FUV3; TRSEChange at FUV4; TRSEChange at FUV5; TRSEChange at FUV6; TRSEChange at FUV7; TRSEChange at FUV8; TRSEBaseline; DRSChange at C1D1; DRSChange at C2D1; DRSChange at C3D1; DRSChange at C4D1; DRSChange at C5D1; DRSChange at C6D1; DRSChange at STC/EW; DRSChange at EoCTR; DRSChange at FUV1; DRSChange at FUV2; DRSChange at FUV3; DRSChange at FUV4; DRSChange at FUV5; DRSChange at FUV6; DRSChange at FUV7; DRSChange at FUV8; DRSBaseline; FatigueChange at C1D1; FatigueChange at C2D1; FatigueChange at C3D1; FatigueChange at C4D1; FatigueChange at C5D1; FatigueChange at C6D1; FatigueChange at STC/EW; FatigueChange at EoCTR; FatigueChange at FUV1; FatigueChange at FUV2; FatigueChange at FUV3; FatigueChange at FUV4; FatigueChange at FUV5; FatigueChange at FUV6; FatigueChange at FUV7; FatigueChange at FUV8; FatigueBaseline; InfectionChange at C1D1; InfectionChange at C2D1; InfectionChange at C3D1; InfectionChange at C4D1; InfectionChange at C5D1; InfectionChange at C6D1; InfectionChange at STC/EW; InfectionChange at EoCTR; InfectionChange at FUV1; InfectionChange at FUV2; InfectionChange at FUV3; InfectionChange at FUV4; InfectionChange at FUV5; InfectionChange at FUV6; InfectionChange at FUV7; InfectionChange at FUV8; Infection
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study9.420.120.621.980.520.64-0.130.130.261.192.65-0.132.841.32-1.67-8.330.0016.95-2.74-4.77-3.35-5.12-4.79-5.30-6.51-5.86-5.82-3.57-3.76-2.66-2.19-3.33-8.33-8.3321.74-2.24-5.47-3.17-4.17-4.36-2.31-4.69-3.97-4.23-1.85-2.42-0.353.513.33-33.330.0014.01-2.24-3.61-1.32-3.13-2.56-2.95-1.69-3.44-2.65-0.53-0.540.537.468.33-16.67-25.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HRQoL as Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Functional Scales Score and Global Health Status/Global Quality-of-Life (QoL) Scale Score

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a validated self-report measure consisting of 30 questions incorporated into 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, and Social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea, and vomiting), a global health status/global QoL scale, and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, and diarrhea). Most questions used 4-point scale (1='Not at all' to 4='Very much'), while 2 questions used 7-point scale (1='very poor' to 7='Excellent'). Scores were averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; where higher score for functional scales=poor level of functioning; higher score for global health status/global QoL=better HRQoL. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline, D1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, STC/EW visit (up to C6D28), EoCTR visit (8 to 12 weeks after C6D1), and FUVs (every 12 weeks after EoCTR up to 3 years); Cycle length = 28 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline; Physical functioningChange at C1D1; Physical functioningChange at C2D1; Physical functioningChange at C3D1; Physical functioningChange at C4D1; Physical functioningChange at C5D1; Physical functioningChange at C6D1; Physical functioningChange at STC/EW; Physical functioningChange at EoCTR; Physical functioningChange at FUV1; Physical functioningChange at FUV2; Physical functioningChange at FUV3; Physical functioningChange at FUV4; Physical functioningChange at FUV5; Physical functioningChange at FUV6; Physical functioningChange at FUV7; Physical functioningChange at FUV8; Physical functioningChange at FUV9; Physical functioningBaseline; Role functioningChange at C1D1; Role functioningChange at C2D1; Role functioningChange at C3D1; Role functioningChange at C4D1; Role functioningChange at C5D1; Role functioningChange at C6D1; Role functioningChange at STC/EW; Role functioningChange at EoCTR; Role functioningChange at FUV1; Role functioningChange at FUV2; Role functioningChange at FUV3; Role functioningChange at FUV4; Role functioningChange at FUV5; Role functioningChange at FUV6; Role functioningChange at FUV7; Role functioningChange at FUV8; Role functioningChange at FUV9; Role functioningBaseline; Emotional functioningChange at C1D1; Emotional functioningChange at C2D1; Emotional functioningChange at C3D1; Emotional functioningChange at C4D1; Emotional functioningChange at C5D1; Emotional functioningChange at C6D1; Emotional functioningChange at STC/EW; Emotional functioningChange at EoCTR; Emotional functioningChange at FUV1; Emotional functioningChange at FUV2; Emotional functioningChange at FUV3; Emotional functioningChange at FUV4; Emotional functioningChange at FUV5; Emotional functioningChange at FUV6; Emotional functioningChange at FUV7; Emotional functioningChange at FUV8; Emotional functioningChange at FUV9; Emotional functioningBaseline; Cognitive functioningChange at C1D1; Cognitive functioningChange at C2D1; Cognitive functioningChange at C3D1; Cognitive functioningChange at C4D1; Cognitive functioningChange at C5D1; Cognitive functioningChange at C6D1; Cognitive functioningChange at STC/EW; Cognitive functioningChange at EoCTR; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV1; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV2; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV3; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV4; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV5; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV6; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV7; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV8; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV9; Cognitive functioningBaseline; Social functioningChange at C1D1; Social functioningChange at C2D1; Social functioningChange at C3D1; Social functioningChange at C4D1; Social functioningChange at C5D1; Social functioningChange at C6D1; Social functioningChange at STC/EW; Social functioningChange at EoCTR; Social functioningChange at FUV1; Social functioningChange at FUV2; Social functioningChange at FUV3; Social functioningChange at FUV4; Social functioningChange at FUV5; Social functioningChange at FUV6; Social functioningChange at FUV7; Social functioningChange at FUV8; Social functioningChange at FUV9; Social functioningBaseline; Global health status/QoLChange at C1D1; Global health status/QoLChange at C2D1; Global health status/QoLChange at C3D1; Global health status/QoLChange at C4D1; Global health status/QoLChange at C5D1; Global health status/QoLChange at C6D1; Global health status/QoLChange at STC/EW; Global health status/QoLChange at EoCTR; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV1; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV2; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV3; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV4; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV5; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV6; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV7; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV8; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV9; Global health status/QoL
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study82.590.00.310.222.112.442.251.682.922.272.402.544.741.90-1.41-3.08-9.33-10.0078.250.0-1.26-0.100.870.450.70-0.413.262.933.075.265.412.34-4.042.560.00-16.6778.980.02.242.992.611.142.062.432.583.494.390.634.823.132.275.773.33-16.6786.550.0-0.19-0.32-1.54-1.94-2.68-2.19-2.23-2.021.32-1.630.44-1.49-0.51-1.280.0016.6782.480.0-2.44-2.32-0.55-5.48-5.13-4.06-0.47-1.080.58-0.911.971.791.52-2.56-10.00-25.0063.020.02.732.343.847.364.254.326.105.916.944.807.354.461.018.336.670.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HRQoL as Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Functional Scales Score and Global Health Status/Global Quality-of-Life (QoL) Scale Score

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a validated self-report measure consisting of 30 questions incorporated into 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, and Social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea, and vomiting), a global health status/global QoL scale, and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, and diarrhea). Most questions used 4-point scale (1='Not at all' to 4='Very much'), while 2 questions used 7-point scale (1='very poor' to 7='Excellent'). Scores were averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; where higher score for functional scales=poor level of functioning; higher score for global health status/global QoL=better HRQoL. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline, D1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, STC/EW visit (up to C6D28), EoCTR visit (8 to 12 weeks after C6D1), and FUVs (every 12 weeks after EoCTR up to 3 years); Cycle length = 28 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline; Physical functioningChange at C1D1; Physical functioningChange at C2D1; Physical functioningChange at C3D1; Physical functioningChange at C4D1; Physical functioningChange at C5D1; Physical functioningChange at C6D1; Physical functioningChange at STC/EW; Physical functioningChange at EoCTR; Physical functioningChange at FUV1; Physical functioningChange at FUV2; Physical functioningChange at FUV3; Physical functioningChange at FUV4; Physical functioningChange at FUV5; Physical functioningChange at FUV6; Physical functioningChange at FUV7; Physical functioningChange at FUV8; Physical functioningBaseline; Role functioningChange at C1D1; Role functioningChange at C2D1; Role functioningChange at C3D1; Role functioningChange at C4D1; Role functioningChange at C5D1; Role functioningChange at C6D1; Role functioningChange at STC/EW; Role functioningChange at EoCTR; Role functioningChange at FUV1; Role functioningChange at FUV2; Role functioningChange at FUV3; Role functioningChange at FUV4; Role functioningChange at FUV5; Role functioningChange at FUV6; Role functioningChange at FUV7; Role functioningChange at FUV8; Role functioningBaseline; Emotional functioningChange at C1D1; Emotional functioningChange at C2D1; Emotional functioningChange at C3D1; Emotional functioningChange at C4D1; Emotional functioningChange at C5D1; Emotional functioningChange at C6D1; Emotional functioningChange at STC/EW; Emotional functioningChange at EoCTR; Emotional functioningChange at FUV1; Emotional functioningChange at FUV2; Emotional functioningChange at FUV3; Emotional functioningChange at FUV4; Emotional functioningChange at FUV5; Emotional functioningChange at FUV6; Emotional functioningChange at FUV7; Emotional functioningChange at FUV8; Emotional functioningBaseline; Cognitive functioningChange at C1D1; Cognitive functioningChange at C2D1; Cognitive functioningChange at C3D1; Cognitive functioningChange at C4D1; Cognitive functioningChange at C5D1; Cognitive functioningChange at C6D1; Cognitive functioningChange at STC/EW; Cognitive functioningChange at EoCTR; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV1; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV2; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV3; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV4; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV5; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV6; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV7; Cognitive functioningChange at FUV8; Cognitive functioningBaseline; Social functioningChange at C1D1; Social functioningChange at C2D1; Social functioningChange at C3D1; Social functioningChange at C4D1; Social functioningChange at C5D1; Social functioningChange at C6D1; Social functioningChange at STC/EW; Social functioningChange at EoCTR; Social functioningChange at FUV1; Social functioningChange at FUV2; Social functioningChange at FUV3; Social functioningChange at FUV4; Social functioningChange at FUV5; Social functioningChange at FUV6; Social functioningChange at FUV7; Social functioningChange at FUV8; Social functioningBaseline; Global health status/QoLChange at C1D1; Global health status/QoLChange at C2D1; Global health status/QoLChange at C3D1; Global health status/QoLChange at C4D1; Global health status/QoLChange at C5D1; Global health status/QoLChange at C6D1; Global health status/QoLChange at STC/EW; Global health status/QoLChange at EoCTR; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV1; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV2; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV3; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV4; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV5; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV6; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV7; Global health status/QoLChange at FUV8; Global health status/QoL
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study83.771.392.991.465.544.624.514.534.343.812.753.440.85-1.751.330.000.0083.82-1.742.491.825.134.361.792.602.122.65-1.851.88-0.351.75-13.33-16.6716.6782.134.355.605.344.193.973.085.343.494.370.662.821.952.635.00-8.330.0089.86-1.240.25-1.56-0.26-0.26-0.771.04-0.27-0.26-2.38-2.96-1.77-6.140.000.000.0085.51-1.740.253.654.622.563.851.041.881.591.321.881.060.0010.0033.3333.3367.396.345.352.217.057.185.906.517.667.014.506.326.384.395.0016.678.33

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Using Standard iwCLL Guidelines

PFS was defined as the time from randomization until first occurrence of PD/relapse as assessed by the investigator using iwCLL guidelines, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: occurrence of one of the following: new lesion; new palpable lymph node (>1.5 cm); unequivocal progression of non-target lesion; increase of >/=50% in splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, blood lymphocytes with count >/=5000/mcL, longest diameter of any lesion; transformation to more aggressive histology; decrease of >/=50% in platelet or neutrophil count, or hemoglobin level by >2 g/dL or to <10 g/dL. Participants who had not progressed, relapsed, or died at the time of analysis, were censored on the date of last assessment. In case of no disease assessment after baseline, PFS was censored at the time of randomization+1 day. The median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and the 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed using method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8 years 5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study17.0
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study54.7

[back to top]

PFS as Assessed by the IRC Using Standard iwCLL Guidelines in Participants With 17p Deletion as Identified by FISH Test

PFS was defined as the time from randomization until first occurrence of PD/relapse as assessed by the IRC using iwCLL guidelines, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: occurrence of one of the following: new lesion; new palpable lymph node (>1.5 cm); unequivocal progression of non-target lesion; increase of >/=50% in splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, blood lymphocytes with count >/=5000/mcL, longest diameter of any lesion; transformation to more aggressive histology; decrease of >/=50% in platelet or neutrophil count, or hemoglobin level by >2 g/dL or to <10 g/dL. Participants who had not progressed, relapsed, or died at the time of analysis, were censored on the date of last assessment. In case of no disease assessment after baseline, PFS was censored at the time of randomization+1 day. The median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and the 95% CI was computed using method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. No new IRC data was generated post the primary analysis. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine + Rituximab 17p Del. Population16.1
Venetoclax + Rituximab 17p Del. PopulationNA

[back to top]

PFS as Assessed by the IRC Using Standard iwCLL Guidelines

PFS was defined as the time from randomization until first occurrence of PD/relapse as assessed by the IRC using iwCLL guidelines, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: occurrence of one of the following: new lesion; new palpable lymph node (>1.5 cm); unequivocal progression of non-target lesion; increase of >/=50% in splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, blood lymphocytes with count >/=5000/mcL, longest diameter of any lesion; transformation to more aggressive histology; decrease of >/=50% in platelet or neutrophil count, or hemoglobin level by >2 g/dL or to <10 g/dL. Participants who had not progressed, relapsed, or died at the time of analysis, were censored on the date of last assessment. In case of no disease assessment after baseline, PFS was censored at the time of randomization+1 day. The median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and the 95% CI was computed using method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. No new IRC data was generated post the primary analysis. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study18.1
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main StudyNA

[back to top]

PFS as Assessed by the Investigator Using Standard iwCLL Guidelines in Participants With 17p Deletion as Identified by FISH Test

PFS was defined as the time from randomization until first occurrence of PD/relapse as assessed by the investigator using iwCLL guidelines, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: occurrence of one of the following: new lesion; new palpable lymph node (>1.5 cm); unequivocal progression of non-target lesion; increase of >/=50% in splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, blood lymphocytes with count >/=5000/mcL, longest diameter of any lesion; transformation to more aggressive histology; decrease of >/=50% in platelet or neutrophil count, or hemoglobin level by >2 g/dL or to <10 g/dL. Participants who had not progressed, relapsed, or died at the time of analysis, were censored on the date of last assessment. In case of no disease assessment after baseline, PFS was censored at the time of randomization+1 day. The median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and the 95% CI was computed using method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8 years 5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine + Rituximab 17p Del. Population15.4
Venetoclax + Rituximab 17p Del. Population47.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Start of New Anti-CLL Treatment or Death as Assessed by the Investigator

Percentage of participants with start of new non-protocol-specified anti-CLL therapy, as assessed by the investigator, or death from any cause, during the study, was reported. Percentage is rounded off. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to start of new ani-CLL therapy or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8 years 5 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study81.5
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study62.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With PD/Relapse, Start of a New Anti-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Therapy, or Death as Assessed by the Investigator Using iwCLL Guidelines

Percentage of participants with PD/relapse, death from any cause, or start of a new non-protocol-specified anti-CLL therapy as assessed by the investigator, during the study, was reported. PD was defined as occurrence of one of the following events: appearance of any new extra nodal lesion; new palpable lymph node (>1.5 cm); unequivocal progression of non-target lesion; an increase of >/=50% compared to baseline in splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, number of blood lymphocytes with lymphocyte count >/=5000/mcL, or in longest diameter of any extra nodal lesion; transformation to a more aggressive histology; decrease of >/=50% compared to baseline in platelet or neutrophil count; or decrease in hemoglobin level by >2 g/dL or to <10 g/dL. Percentages are rounded off. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to PD/relapse, start of a new anti-CLL therapy, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (approximately 8 years 5 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine + Rituximab Main Study89.2
Venetoclax + Rituximab Main Study71.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by the IRC Using Standard iwCLL Guidelines in Participants With 17p Deletion as Identified by FISH Test

Assessment of response was performed by the IRC according to the iwCLL guidelines. PD was defined as occurrence of one of the following events: appearance of any new extra nodal lesion; new palpable lymph node (>1.5 cm); unequivocal progression of non-target lesion; an increase of >/=50% compared to baseline in splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, number of blood lymphocytes with lymphocyte count >/=5000/mcL, or in longest diameter of any extra nodal lesion; transformation to a more aggressive histology; decrease of >/=50% compared to baseline in platelet or neutrophil count; or decrease in hemoglobin level by >2 g/dL or to <10 g/dL. No new IRC data was generated post the primary analysis. (NCT02005471)
Timeframe: Baseline up to PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine + Rituximab 17p Del. Population47.8
Venetoclax + Rituximab 17p Del. Population19.6

[back to top]

Number of Patients Achieving Neutrophil Engraftment

Proportion of patients who successfully achieve neutrophil engraftment after stem cell transplant, defined as an absolute neutrophil count of 500/mm3 or for three consecutive days. (NCT02059239)
Timeframe: 35 Days Post-Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Chemo Plus Autologous Transplantation16
Chemo Plus Allogeneic Transplantation13

[back to top]

Number of Patients Achieving Platelet Engraftment

Proportion of patients who successfully achieve platelet engraftment after stem cell transplant, defined as a platelet count of >20k/microL for three consecutive days without transfusion support for seven consecutive days. (NCT02059239)
Timeframe: 74 Days Post-Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Chemo Plus Autologous Transplantation16
Chemo Plus Allogeneic Transplantation12

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival After Stem Cell Transplant

Time elapsed between stem cell transplant (Day 0) and disease progression, as defined by the Cheson Criteria (the appearance of any new lesion >1.5cm in size or a greater than 50% increase in the diameter of a previously identified node of over 1cm in size) (NCT02059239)
Timeframe: Stem cell transplant (Day 0) up to 2 years post-transplant

InterventionMonths (Median)
Chemo Plus Autologous TransplantationNA
Chemo Plus Allogeneic Transplantation8

[back to top] [back to top]

Disease Response 30 Days Post-Transplant

Proportion of patients achieving a complete remission (CR; disappearance of clinically overt disease with no FDG-avid lesions on PET scan), partial remission (PR; reduction in clinical disease buden and >50% bi-dimensional decrease in tumor size on imaging), stable disease (SD; failure to meet the criteria for CR, PR or PD with no new areas of disease involvement) or progressive disease (PD; the appearance of any new lesion >1.5cm in size or a greater than 50% increase in the diameter of a previously identified node of over 1cm in size), as per Cheson Criteria, 30 days following autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant (NCT02059239)
Timeframe: 30 days after stem cell transplant

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete RemissionPartial RemissionStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseNot Assessed
Chemo Plus Allogeneic Transplantation73111
Chemo Plus Autologous Transplantation122200

[back to top]

Overall Survival at Day 365 Post-Transplant

The time from stem cell infusion (Day 0) to death from any cause. (NCT02059239)
Timeframe: From Day 0 until time of death, assessed up to 365 days post-transplant

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AliveDeceased
Chemo Plus Allogeneic Transplantation67
Chemo Plus Autologous Transplantation160

[back to top]

Disease Response at 1 Year Post-Transplant

Proportion of patients achieving a complete remission (CR; disappearance of clinically overt disease with no FDG-avid lesions on PET scan), partial remission (PR; reduction in clinical disease buden and >50% bi-dimensional decrease in tumor size on imaging), stable disease (SD; failure to meet the criteria for CR, PR or PD with no new areas of disease involvement) or progressive disease (PD; the appearance of any new lesion >1.5cm in size or a greater than 50% increase in the diameter of a previously identified node of over 1cm in size), as per Cheson Criteria, 1 year following autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant (NCT02059239)
Timeframe: 1 year after stem cell transplant

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete RemissionPartial RemissionStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseNot AssessedPatient Deceased
Chemo Plus Allogeneic Transplantation400207
Chemo Plus Autologous Transplantation1210300

[back to top]

Disease Response Following Salvage Chemotherapy

Proportion of patients achieving a complete remission (CR; disappearance of clinically overt disease with no FDG-avid lesions on PET scan), partial remission (PR; reduction in clinical disease buden and >50% bi-dimensional decrease in tumor size on imaging), stable disease (SD; failure to meet the criteria for CR, PR or PD with no new areas of disease involvement) or progressive disease (PD; the appearance of any new lesion >1.5cm in size or a greater than 50% increase in the diameter of a previously identified node of over 1cm in size), as per Cheson Criteria, following salvage chemotherapy with Bendamustine. (NCT02059239)
Timeframe: Within 14 days of salvage chemotherapy treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete RemissionPartial RemissionStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseNot Assessed
Chemo Plus Allogeneic Transplantation16261
Chemo Plus Autologous Transplantation48411

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Previous/Concomitant Diseases

(NCT02071225)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 4.5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine97.2

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from the start of treatment to disease progression (DP), relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, as assessed by the investigator. DP: at least one of the following characteristics: increase ≥ 50% in lymphocytes up to at least 5 x 10^9/L, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes, increase ≥ 50% of the longest diameter of any previous area of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, increase ≥ 50% of the size of the liver and/or spleen, transformation to a more aggressive histology, after treatment progression of any cytopenia: decrease of hemoglobin levels of more than 20 g/L or to below 100 g/L and/or decrease of platelet counts by more than 50% or to below 100 x 10^9/L and/or decrease in the neutrophil counts by more than 50% or to below 1.0 x 10^9/L if the marrow biopsy also shows infiltration of clonal chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells. (NCT02071225)
Timeframe: From start of treatment up to disease progression or relapse or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 4.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine24.14

[back to top]

Best Response Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Using the IWCLL 2008 Criteria

Best overall response was defined as percentage of participants achieving a best response of CR, CRi and PR. CR: lymphocytes below 4 x 10^9/L, absence of lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly and splenomegaly, absence of disease or constitutional symptoms, neutrophils > 1.5 x 10^9/L, platelets > 100 x 10^9/L, hemoglobin > 110 g/L, bone marrow at least normocellular for age. CRi: CR with persistent cytopenia, i.e. anemia, thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia. PR: reduction ≥ 50% of the lymphocyte count AND reduction ≥ 50% of the lymphadenopathy OR reduction ≥ 50% of the size of the liver if enlarged at baseline OR reduction ≥ 50% of the size of the spleen if enlarged at baseline PLUS one of the following: neutrophils > 1.5 x 10^9/L, platelets > 100 x 10^9/L, hemoglobin > 110 g/L or increase ≥ 50% compared to pre-treatment. (NCT02071225)
Timeframe: During study treatment and until 6 months after end of study treatment at approximately 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CRCRiPR
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine46.31.942.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as AEs. An SAE was any AE that was any of the following: fatal, life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/ birth defect, and was considered a significant medical event by the investigator. (NCT02071225)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 4.5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine94.451.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity

MRD negativity was defined as the presence of less than 1 cell of CLL per 10,000 leukocytes (= category 0, <0.01%) assessed in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) by flow cytometry after the end of the treatment at the final response assessment. (NCT02071225)
Timeframe: At approximately 9 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
MRD in BM: Cat 0MRD in PB: Cat 0
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine36.453.4

[back to top]

Time to Re-treatment/New Anti-leukemia Therapy

Time to re-treatment/new leukemia therapy was defined as the time between the start of treatment and the date of the first administration of re-treatment or new leukemia therapy. (NCT02071225)
Timeframe: Up to 4.5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Obinutuzumab + BendamustineNA

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS)

DFS was defined for all participants who achieved complete response (CRi or CR). DFS lasted from the date on which CRi or CR was recorded until the date on which the first DP or death from any cause occurred. DP: at least one of the following characteristics: increase ≥ 50% in lymphocytes up to at least 5 x 10^9/L, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes, increase ≥ 50% of the longest diameter of any previous area of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, increase ≥ 50% of the size of the liver and/or spleen, transformation to a more aggressive histology, after treatment, progression of any cytopenia: decrease of hemoglobin levels of more than 20 g/L or to below 100 g/L and/or decrease of platelet counts by more than 50% or to below 100 x 10^9/L and/or decrease in the neutrophil counts by more than 50% or to below 1.0 x 10^9/L if the marrow biopsy also shows infiltration of clonal CLL cells. (NCT02071225)
Timeframe: From occurrence of complete response up to disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 4.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine23.02

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator Using the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2008 Criteria

ORR was defined as percentage of participants achieving Complete Response (CR), incomplete CR (CRi) or Partial Response (PR). CR: lymphocytes below 4 x 10^9/L, absence of lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly and splenomegaly, absence of disease or constitutional symptoms, neutrophils > 1.5 x 10^9/L, platelets > 100 x 10^9/L, hemoglobin > 110 g/L, bone marrow at least normocellular for age. CRi: CR with persistent cytopenia, i.e. anemia, thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia. PR: reduction ≥ 50% of the lymphocyte count AND reduction ≥ 50% of the lymphadenopathy OR reduction ≥ 50% of the size of the liver if enlarged at baseline OR reduction ≥ 50% of the size of the spleen if enlarged at baseline PLUS one of the following: neutrophils > 1.5 x 10^9/L, platelets > 100 x 10^9/L, hemoglobin > 110 g/L or increase ≥ 50% compared to pre-treatment. (NCT02071225)
Timeframe: 2-3 months after last dose of the study treatment (up to approximately 9 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine78.6

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DR)

DR was defined for participants with CRi, CR or PR. DR spanned from the date on which response was recorded until the date on which DP or death from any cause occurred. DP: at least one of the following characteristics: increase ≥ 50% in lymphocytes up to at least 5 x 10^9/L, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes, increase ≥ 50% of the longest diameter of any previous area of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, increase ≥ 50% of the size of the liver and/or spleen, transformation to a more aggressive histology, after treatment, progression of any cytopenia: decrease of hemoglobin levels of more than 20 g/L or to below 100 g/L and/or decrease of platelet counts by more than 50% or to below 100 x 10^9/L and/or decrease in the neutrophil counts by more than 50% or to below 1.0 x 10^9/L if the marrow biopsy also shows infiltration of clonal CLL cells. (NCT02071225)
Timeframe: From occurrence of CR or PR up to disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 4.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine21.41

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With AEs of Special Interest (AESIs)

AESIs included any of the following: SAEs associated with the infusion of obinutuzumab: obinutuzumab serious infusion-related reactions, which were defined as AEs occurring during or within 24 hours following the administration of an infusion of obinutuzumab and considered related to obinutuzumab; serious infection; serious neutropenia; any tumor lysis syndrome (TLS); second malignancies. (NCT02071225)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 4.5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine45.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Medication

Concomitant therapies included any medication (prescription medication, over-the-counter medications, herbal/homeopathic remedies, nutritional supplements) used by subjects in the 7 days prior to screening until the end of treatment. The following treatments were not permitted during the study treatment period: investigational or unauthorized or unapproved medicinal products, immunotherapy or radioimmunotherapy (other than the trial immunotherapy, obinutuzumab), chemotherapy (other than the trial chemotherapy, bendamustine) and radiotherapy. (NCT02071225)
Timeframe: From 7 days prior to screening to the end of treatment at 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine54.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to death from any cause. (NCT02071225)
Timeframe: From start of treatment up to death of any cause (up to approximately 4.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Obinutuzumab + BendamustineNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Prematurely

(NCT02071225)
Timeframe: Up to end of treatment at 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine41.7

[back to top]

Event Free Survival (EFS)

EFS was defined as the time from the start of treatment to DP/relapse, death from any cause or start of a new anti-leukemia therapy. DP: at least one of the following characteristics: increase ≥ 50% in lymphocytes up to at least 5 x 10^9/L, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes, increase ≥ 50% of the longest diameter of any previous area of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, increase ≥ 50% of the size of the liver and/or spleen, transformation to a more aggressive histology, after treatment, progression of any cytopenia: decrease of hemoglobin levels of more than 20 g/L or to below 100 g/L and/or decrease of platelet counts by more than 50% or to below 100 x 10^9/L and/or decrease in the neutrophil counts by more than 50% or to below 1.0 x 10^9/L if the marrow biopsy also shows infiltration of clonal CLL cells. (NCT02071225)
Timeframe: From start of treatment up to disease progression or relapse or death or start of a new anti-leukemic therapy, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 4.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine24.14

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CMR According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET Scan at Year 1

CMR: a score 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake <=mediastinum), or 3 (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: 48-56 weeks after Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)55.6
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)17.3
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)39.2
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)47.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CMR According to IRC as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET Scan at Year 1

CMR: a score 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake <=mediastinum), or 3 (uptake NCT02187861)
Timeframe: 48-56 weeks after Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)55.6
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)21.2
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)41.2
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)39.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Metabolic Response (CMR) According to Independent Review Committee (IRC) as Per Lugano Classification, Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan at Primary Response Assessment (PRA)

CMR: a score 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake less than or equal to [<=] mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than [<] mediastinum but <=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-point scale (5-PS), for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with no new lesions and no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow. Assessment was performed by an IRC according to Lugano classification using PET scan. 95% confidence interval (CI) for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (PRA) (Cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)55.6
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)11.5
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)74.5
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)70.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression (According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET or CT Scan) or Death

PD: a score 4 (uptake moderately >liver) or 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with increase in intensity of uptake from baseline on PET 5-PS for individual target nodes/nodal lesions; new FDG-avid foci for extranodal lesions; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma for new lesions; or new or recurrent FDG-avid foci for bone marrow. Assessment was performed by Investigator according to Lugano classification using PET or CT scan. (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death due to any cause (assessed up to approximately 2.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)44.4
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)86.5
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)41.2
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)52.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression (According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET or CT Scan), Death, or Start of a New Anti-lymphoma Therapy

PD: a score 4 (uptake moderately >liver) or 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with increase in intensity of uptake from baseline on PET 5-PS for individual target nodes/nodal lesions; new FDG-avid foci for extranodal lesions; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma for new lesions; or new or recurrent FDG-avid foci for bone marrow. Assessment was performed by Investigator according to Lugano classification using PET or CT scan. (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, death, or start of a new anti-lymphoma therapy whichever occurred first (assessed up to approximately 2.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)44.4
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)86.5
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)41.2
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)52.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With OR According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET or CT Scan

OR was defined as CMR/CR or PMR/PR. CMR, CR, PMR, and PR have been defined in previous endpoints, and are not repeated here due to space constraint. Assessment was performed by Investigator according to Lugano classification using PET scan or CT scan (if PET is missing). (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death due to any cause (assessed up to approximately 2.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)66.7
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)36.5
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)80.4
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)80.4

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET or CT Scan

PFS was defined as the period from the date of treatment initiation (Safety Run-in and Arm A) or randomization date (Arms B and C) until the date of disease progression, or death due to any cause. PD: a score 4 (uptake moderately >liver) or 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with increase in intensity of uptake from baseline on PET 5-PS for individual target nodes/nodal lesions; new FDG-avid foci for extranodal lesions; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma for new lesions; or new or recurrent FDG-avid foci for bone marrow. Assessment was performed by Investigator according to Lugano classification using PET or CT scan. PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death due to any cause (assessed up to approximately 2.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)35.09
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)6.57
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)27.63
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)18.43

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) According to IRC as Per Lugano Classification, Using Computed Tomography (CT) Scan

CR: defined as reduction of longest transverse diameter of lesion (LDi) of target nodes/nodal masses to <=1.5 centimeters (cm), and no extralymphatic sites of disease; absence of non-measured lesions and new lesions; reduction of enlarged organs to normal; and normal/immunohistochemistry (IHC)-negative bone marrow morphology. Assessment was performed by an IRC according to Lugano classification using CT scan. 95% CI for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 and 48-56 weeks after Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6-8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1Year 1
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)39.227.5
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)25.523.5
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)44.455.6
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)5.713.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using CT Scan

CR: defined as reduction of LDi of target nodes/nodal masses to <=1.5 cm, and no extralymphatic sites of disease; absence of non-measured lesions and new lesions; reduction of enlarged organs to normal; and normal/IHC-negative bone marrow morphology. Assessment was performed by Investigator according to Lugano classification using CT scan. 95% CI for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: 4-10 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 and 48-56 weeks after Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
4-10 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1Year 1
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)15.713.7
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)31.421.6
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)22.233.3
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)5.75.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) According to IRC as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET Scan

OR was defined as CMR or Partial Metabolic Response (PMR). CMR: a score 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake <=mediastinum), or 3 (] liver) or 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size on PET 5-PS for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with no new lesions and reduced residual uptake in bone marrow compared with baseline. Assessment was performed by an IRC according to Lugano classification using PET scan. 95% CI for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 and 48-56 weeks after Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6-8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1Year 1
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)76.545.1
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)74.551.0
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)55.666.7
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)21.232.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With OR According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using CT Scan

OR was defined as CR or PR. CR: reduction of LDi of target nodes/nodal masses to <=1.5 cm, and no extralymphatic sites of disease; absence of non-measured lesions and new lesions; reduction of enlarged organs to normal; and normal/IHC-negative bone marrow morphology. PR: >=50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extra-nodal sites; absence/reduction/no increase in size of non-measured lesions; reduction in length of spleen at least >50% beyond normal; and no new lesions. Assessment was performed by Investigator according to Lugano classification using CT scan. 95% CI for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: 4-10 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 and 48-56 weeks after Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
4-10 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1Year 1
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)74.547.1
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)78.449.0
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)55.655.6
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)32.128.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With OR According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET Scan

OR was defined as CMR or PMR. CMR: a score 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake <=mediastinum), or 3 (liver) or 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size on PET 5-PS for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with no new lesions and reduced residual uptake in bone marrow compared with baseline. Assessment was performed by Investigator according to Lugano classification using PET scan. 95% CI for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: 4-10 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 and 48-56 weeks after Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
4-10 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1Year 1
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)76.539.2
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)76.549.0
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)55.655.6
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)28.821.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With OR According to IRC as Per Lugano Classification, Using CT Scan

OR was defined as CR or Partial Response (PR). CR: reduction of LDi of target nodes/nodal masses to <=1.5 cm, and no extralymphatic sites of disease; absence of non-measured lesions and new lesions; reduction of enlarged organs to normal; and normal/IHC-negative bone marrow morphology. PR: greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) decrease in sum of the product of the perpendicular diameters (SPD) of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extra-nodal sites; absence/reduction/no increase in size of non-measured lesions; reduction in length of spleen at least >50% beyond normal; and no new lesions. Assessment was performed by an IRC according to Lugano classification using CT scan. 95% CI for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 and 48-56 weeks after Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6-8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1Year 1
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)80.441.2
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)84.360.8
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)66.766.7
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)30.222.6

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Venetoclax

(NCT02187861)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (within 30 minutes), and 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1; pre-dose (within 30 minutes) on Cycle 1 Days 8, 15, 22; pre-dose (within 30 minutes) and 4 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 4 and 6 (Cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionhours (Median)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)8.00
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)6.00
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)6.21

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 8 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-8h) of Venetoclax

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) to 8 hours post dose (AUC0-8h). (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (within 30 minutes), and 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1; pre-dose (within 30 minutes) on Cycle 1 Days 8, 15, 22; pre-dose (within 30 minutes) and 4 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 4 and 6 (Cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionhours*ng/mL (Mean)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)5240
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)4820
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)5330

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Observed Concentration (AUClast) of Venetoclax

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast). (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (within 30 minutes), and 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1; pre-dose (within 30 minutes) on Cycle 1 Days 8, 15, 22; pre-dose (within 30 minutes) and 4 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 4 and 6 (Cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionhours*ng/mL (Mean)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)5310
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)4950
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)5500

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET or CT Scan

DOR was defined as time from CMR/CR or PMR/PR until progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. CMR, CR, PMR, and PR have been defined in previous endpoints, and are not repeated here due to space constraint. PD: a score 4 (uptake moderately >liver) or 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with increase in intensity of uptake from baseline on PET 5-PS for individual target nodes/nodal lesions; new FDG-avid foci for extranodal lesions; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma for new lesions; or new or recurrent FDG-avid foci for bone marrow. Assessment was performed by Investigator according to Lugano classification using PET scan or CT scan (if PET is missing). DOR was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: From CMR or PMR until disease progression or death due to any cause (assessed up to approximately 2.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)32.46
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)15.79
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)24.87
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)15.64

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS) According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET or CT Scan

EFS was defined as the period from the date of treatment initiation (Safety Run-in and Arm A) or randomization date (Arms B and C) to the date of disease progression, death, or start of a new anti-lymphoma therapy whichever occurred first. PD: a score 4 (uptake moderately >liver) or 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with increase in intensity of uptake from baseline on PET 5-PS for individual target nodes/nodal lesions; new FDG-avid foci for extranodal lesions; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma for new lesions; or new or recurrent FDG-avid foci for bone marrow. Assessment was performed by Investigator according to Lugano classification using PET or CT scan. EFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, death, or start of a new anti-lymphoma therapy whichever occurred first (assessed up to approximately 2.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)35.09
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)6.57
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)27.63
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)18.43

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Venetoclax

(NCT02187861)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (within 30 minutes), and 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1; pre-dose (within 30 minutes) on Cycle 1 Days 8, 15, 22; pre-dose (within 30 minutes) and 4 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 4 and 6 (Cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)1350
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)1220
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)1340

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the period from the date of treatment initiation (Safety Run-in and Arm A) or randomization date (Arms B and C) to death due to any cause. For participants who are alive, OS was censored at the last contact. OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: Baseline until death due to any cause (assessed up to approximately 2.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)NA
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)NA
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)NA
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)NA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause

(NCT02187861)
Timeframe: Baseline until death due to any cause (assessed up to approximately 2.5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)0
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)5.8
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)2.0
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)3.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CMR According to Investigator as Per Lugano Classification, Using PET Scan at PRA

CMR: a score 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake <=mediastinum), or 3 (NCT02187861)
Timeframe: 4-10 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort:Safety Run-In (Venetoclax + BR)55.6
Chemotherapy-Free Cohort: Arm A (Venetoclax + Rituximab)15.4
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm B (Venetoclax + BR)70.6
Chemotherapy-Containing Cohort: Arm C (BR)68.6

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade 3-4 Adverse Events From the Combination of Bendamustine Hydrochloride, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Based on the Common Terminology Criteria Version 4.0

All adverse events are tracked during the course of the trial. Adverse events with a grade of 3-4 will be tracked and recorded. (NCT02224729)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionAdverse Events (Number)
Bendamustine, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (Standard)22

[back to top]

Count of Participants That Experience Overall Response Following 4 Cycles of the Combination Regimen BBd

ORR (partial remission or better) to induction therapy following 4 cycles of the combination regimen BBd. (NCT02224729)
Timeframe: At least 140 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (Standard)13

[back to top]

Count of Participants That Experience Overall Survival (OS)

The amount of participants that start treatment with BBd and survive at least one year post treatment completion. (NCT02224729)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (Standard)2

[back to top]

Count of Participants That Experience Progression-free Survival (PFS)

The amount of participants that survive one year after treatment with BBd and do not experience worsening disease. (NCT02224729)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (Standard)2

[back to top]

Count of Participants That Experience Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR)

Very good partial remission (VGPR) to induction therapy following 4 cycles of the combination regimen BBd. As defined as no dectable M-protein on SPEP (Serum protein electrophoresis) but positive IFX (Immunofixation) on serum or urine and >90% reduction of M-protein in serum and urine (NCT02224729)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (Standard)9

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Completed Six Cycles of Study Treatment

(NCT02257242)
Timeframe: Up to 6 cycles of treatment (approximately 6 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection: 1.8 mg/m^21
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection: 1.95 mg/m^20
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection: 1.98 mg/m^21
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection: 2.04 mg/m^21
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection: 2.10 mg/m^21
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection: 2.14 mg/m^21
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection: 2.19 mg/m^21
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection: 2.22 mg/m^21
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection: 2.24 mg/m^21

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose

Determined as the median of the marginal posterior distribution using data from all available patients (NCT02257242)
Timeframe: Up to 6 cycles of treatment (approximately 6 months)

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Dose-escalation Cohort2.24

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

The number of patients achieving complete response during treatment on study (NCT02257242)
Timeframe: Up to 6 cycles of treatment (approximately 6 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection 1.8 mg/m^21
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection 1.95 mg/m^20
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection 1.98 mg/m^20
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection 2.04 mg/m^21
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection 2.10 mg/m^20
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection 2.14 mg/m^21
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection 2.19 mg/m^20
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection 2.22 mg/m^21
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection 2.24 mg/m^21

[back to top]

Phase Ib: Vss of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Obinutuzumab in Cohort 1b

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
InterventionmL/kg (Mean)
acMMAETotal Ab
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in DLBCL64.787.9
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in FL77.287.5

[back to top]

Phase II: Vss of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine and Rituximab in Arms A and C

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
Bendamustine
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL36.5
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL34.3

[back to top]

Phase II: Vss of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine and Obinutuzumab in Arms E and F

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
Bendamustine
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL51.2
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL31.5

[back to top]

Phase II: Vss of Bendamustine and Rituximab in Arms B and D

(NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
Bendamustine
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FL44.9
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL33.2

[back to top]

Phase II: Cmax of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Obinutuzumab and Bendamustine in Arms E and F

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, unconjugated MMAE and total antibody were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1; Cycle 4 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
Interventionug/mL (Mean)
acMMAE: Cycle 1acMMAE: Cycle 4Total Ab: Cycle 1Total Ab: Cycle 4Bendamustine: Cycle 1Obinutuzumab: Cycle 1Obinutuzumab: Cycle 4
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL69284533.356.13.30349727
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL70371339.037.85.47274666

[back to top]

Phase II: Cmax of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Rituximab in Arms A and C

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody and unconjugated MMAE were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1; Cycle 4 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
acMMAE: Cycle 1acMMAE: Cycle 4Total Ab: Cycle 1Total Ab: Cycle 4Bendamustine: Cycle 1Rituximab: Cycle 1
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL62270336.746.13.57188
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL66165935.741.44.23191

[back to top]

Phase II: Cmax of Bendamustine and Rituximab in Arms B and D

(NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
Interventionug/mL (Mean)
BendamustineRituximab
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FL3.21207
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL3.85183

[back to top]

Phase II: CL of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine and Rituximab in Arms A and C

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
InterventionLiters per hour (L/h) (Geometric Mean)
Bendamustine
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL47.9
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL42.6

[back to top]

Phase II: CL of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine and Obinutuzumab in Arms E and F

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
InterventionL/h (Geometric Mean)
Bendamustine
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL61.3
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL39.9

[back to top]

Phase II: CL of Bendamustine and Rituximab in Arms B and D

(NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
InterventionL/h (Geometric Mean)
Bendamustine
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FL54.4
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL46.4

[back to top]

Phase II: AUCinf of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Rituximab in Arms A and C

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
Interventionh*ug/mL (Geometric Mean)
Bendamustine
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL3.29
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL3.62

[back to top]

Phase II: AUCinf of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Obinutuzumab in Arms E and F

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
Interventionh*ug/mL (Geometric Mean)
Bendamustine
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL2.88
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL4.10

[back to top]

Phase II: AUCinf of Bendamustine and Rituximab in Arms B and D

(NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
Interventionh*ug/mL (Geometric Mean)
Bendamustine
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FL2.86
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL3.43

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Bendamustine

Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. As pre specified in the protocol plasma concentration of bendamustine was not assessed in the Phase II NF Cohort (Arm G+H). (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: pre-dose, 5 min, 1 hour (h); 2h, 3h and 4h post dose

,,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 5 min Post DoseCycle 1 Day 2: 1h Post DoseCycle 1 Day 2: 2h Post DoseCycle 1 Day 2: 3h Post DoseCycle 1 Day 2: 4h Post Dose
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FLNA213045684.420.57.60
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FLNA281035355.112.74.58
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCLNA274051893.823.58.11
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCLNA170045110121.58.08
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FLNA309047862.812.43.30
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCLNA379063912828.26.18

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: acMMAE

PK of pola-related analyte acMMAE was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: pre-dose and 30 minutes (min) post dose; Cycle 1 Days 8 and 15; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseStudy Treatment Completion
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCLNA47213.119.670912.3

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: acMMAE

PK of pola-related analyte acMMAE was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: pre-dose and 30 minutes (min) post dose; Cycle 1 Days 8 and 15; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseUnscheduled Visit: Pre-doseStudy Treatment Completion
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FLNA4924.7211.26891.2110.7

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: acMMAE

PK of pola-related analyte acMMAE was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: pre-dose and 30 minutes (min) post dose; Cycle 1 Days 8 and 15; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseUnscheduled VisitStudy Treatment Completion
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FLNA4539.0515.282953.014.9

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: acMMAE

PK of pola-related analyte acMMAE was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: pre-dose and 30 minutes (min) post dose; Cycle 1 Days 8 and 15; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 1 Day 8Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post Dose
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in DLBCLNA61775.925.412.468321.1754
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in FLNA65429.412.23.2168512.2748
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in DLBCLNA71810934.416.683426.2716

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: acMMAE

PK of pola-related analyte acMMAE was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: pre-dose and 30 minutes (min) post dose; Cycle 1 Days 8 and 15; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 1 Day 8Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseStudy Treatment Completion
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in FLNA71990.728.98.7580315.373418.7

[back to top]

Phase II: Percentage of Participants With OR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by Investigator

OR at PRA was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR at the PRA, as assessed by the investigator based on MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and ELS with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi and no ELS of disease organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; bone marrow normal by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. PR per CT only was defined as partial remission in lymph nodes and ELS with ≥50% decrease in sum of the products of greatest diameters (SPD) of up to 6 target measurable lymph nodes and extranodal sites, absent/normal/regressed but with no increase in non-measured lesions, spleen regressing by ≥50% in length beyond normal it, no new sites of lesions. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts). (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 28 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL79.5
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FL75.6
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL45.0
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL15.0
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL80.0
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL33.3
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL42.5

[back to top]

Arm H (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by the IRC

CR was assessed by IRC at PRA according to MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on PET-CT was defined as complete MR in lymph nodes and ELS with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5PS where 1=no uptake above background; 2=uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3=uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4=uptake moderately > liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. Bone marrow is normal by morphology; if indeterminate, IHC negative. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts) or after final dose of study treatment. Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 23 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL42.2

[back to top]

Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With AEs

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as AEs. AEs were reported based on the NCI-CTCAE, v4.0. As pre-specified in the protocol data reported is combined for Arms G and H. Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: From Month 37 to Month 84 (up to approximately 47 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL99.1

[back to top]

Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With OR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by IRC

OR at PRA was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR at the PRA, as assessed by the IRC based on MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and ELS with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi and no ELS of disease organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. PR per CT only was defined as partial remission in lymph nodes and ELS with ≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable lymph nodes and extranodal sites, absent/normal/regressed but with no increase in non-measured lesions, spleen regressing by ≥50% in length beyond normal it, no new sites of lesions. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts). (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to 23 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL33.3

[back to top]

Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With OR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by Investigator

OR at PRA was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR at the PRA, as assessed by the investigator based on MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and ELS with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi and no ELS of disease organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. PR per CT only was defined as partial remission in lymph nodes and ELS with ≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable lymph nodes and extranodal sites, absent/normal/regressed but with no increase in non-measured lesions, spleen regressing by ≥50% in length beyond normal it, no new sites of lesions. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts). (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to 23 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL38.1

[back to top]

Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by the IRC

CR was assessed by IRC at PRA according to MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on PET-CT was defined as complete MR in lymph nodes and ELS with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5PS where 1=no uptake above background; 2=uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3=uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4=uptake moderately > liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. Bone marrow is normal by morphology; if indeterminate, IHC negative. As pre-specified in the protocol data reported is combined for Arms G and H. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts) or after final dose of study treatment. Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 23 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL35.7

[back to top]

Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by IRC

CR was determined by IRC at PRA according to the MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and ELS with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi and no ELS of disease organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts). Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 23 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL14.3

[back to top]

Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by Investigator

CR was determined by Investigator at PRA according to the MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and ELS with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi and no ELS of disease organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts). Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 23 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL9.5

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: acMMAE

PK of pola-related analyte acMMAE was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: pre-dose and 30 minutes (min) post dose; Cycle 1 Days 8 and 15; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseUnscheduled VisitUnscheduled Visit: Pre-doseUnscheduled Visit: 30 min Post DoseStudy Treatment Completion
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCLNA64312.720.764541.10.18091514.2

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Unconjugated MMAE

PK of pola-related analytes unconjugated MMAE was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: pre-dose and 30 min post dose, Cycle 1 Days 8 and 15; Cycles 2 and 4: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseStudy Treatment Completion
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCLNA0.4560.1860.1410.2830.150

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Unconjugated MMAE

PK of pola-related analytes unconjugated MMAE was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: pre-dose and 30 min post dose, Cycle 1 Days 8 and 15; Cycles 2 and 4: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseUnscheduled Visit: Pre-doseStudy Treatment Completion
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FLNA0.4020.03730.05540.1980.01800.0506

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Unconjugated MMAE

PK of pola-related analytes unconjugated MMAE was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: pre-dose and 30 min post dose, Cycle 1 Days 8 and 15; Cycles 2 and 4: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseUnscheduled VisitStudy Treatment Completion
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FLNA0.2430.04510.04810.1950.7380.0682

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of Obinutuzumab

Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycles 1 and 4 Days 1: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; Cycle 2 Day1: pre-dose; Follow up visits on Day 1: Months 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventiong/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseFollow up on Month 3, Day 1Follow up on Month 6, Day 1Follow up on Month 12, Day 1Follow up on Month 18, Day 1UnscheduledStudy Treatment Completion Visit
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FLNA34130129170138.57.640.1620.0084220.8242

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Unconjugated MMAE

PK of pola-related analytes unconjugated MMAE was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: pre-dose and 30 min post dose, Cycle 1 Days 8 and 15; Cycles 2 and 4: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 1 Day 8Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post Dose
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in DLBCLNA0.2341.840.5310.1580.2630.1330.266
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in FLNA0.7261.480.3110.02640.1850.04140.234
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in DLBCLNA0.3272.340.6880.1500.3450.1500.257

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Unconjugated MMAE

PK of pola-related analytes unconjugated MMAE was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: pre-dose and 30 min post dose, Cycle 1 Days 8 and 15; Cycles 2 and 4: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseUnscheduled Visit: Pre-doseUnscheduled Visit: 30 min Post DoseStudy Treatment Completion
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCLNA0.3150.1590.1580.3160.01800.1140.0749

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Unconjugated MMAE

PK of pola-related analytes unconjugated MMAE was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: pre-dose and 30 min post dose, Cycle 1 Days 8 and 15; Cycles 2 and 4: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 1 Day 8Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseStudy Treatment Completion
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in FLNA0.3971.960.7050.05120.2310.05110.1670.0595

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of Obinutuzumab

Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycles 1 and 4 Days 1: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; Cycle 2 Day1: pre-dose; Follow up visits on Day 1: Months 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventiong/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseFollow up on Month 3, Day 1Follow up on Month 6, Day 1Follow up on Month 12, Day 1Follow up on Month 18, Day 1Follow up on Month 24, Day 1Unscheduled Visit: Pre-doseUnscheduled Visit: 30 min Post DoseStudy Treatment Completion Visit
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCLNA22134929064255.115.80.7320.04600.002030.0626349232

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of Obinutuzumab

Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycles 1 and 4 Days 1: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; Cycle 2 Day1: pre-dose; Follow up visits on Day 1: Months 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventiong/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseFollow up on Month 3, Day 1Follow up on Month 6, Day 1Follow up on Month 12, Day 1Follow up on Month 18, Day 1Follow up on Month 24, Day 1Study Treatment Completion Visit
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in FLNA28329367.711.50.2370.009780.00203367

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of Obinutuzumab

Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycles 1 and 4 Days 1: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; Cycle 2 Day1: pre-dose; Follow up visits on Day 1: Months 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; study treatment completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventiong/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseFollow up on Month 3, Day 1Follow up on Month 6, Day 1Follow up on Month 12, Day 1Follow up on Month 18, Day 1Follow up on Month 24, Day 1Unscheduled
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in DLBCLNA41235928.85.380.3890.01070.002033.09

[back to top]

Phase Ib: Vss of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Obinutuzumab in Cohort 1a

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
InterventionmL/kg (Geometric Mean)
acMMAETotal Ab
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in DLBCL82.776.6
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in FL73.082.3

[back to top]

Phase Ib: Cmax of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Rituximab in Cohort 1a

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycles 1, 2 and 4 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
acMMAE: Cycle 1acMMAE: Cycle 2acMMAE: Cycle 4Total Ab: Cycle 1Total Ab: Cycle 2Total Ab: Cycle 4Unconjugated MMAE: Cycle 1
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in DLBCL63469475937.640.644.82.21
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in FL67669776334.336.641.33.31

[back to top]

Phase Ib: Cmax of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Obinutuzumab in Cohort 1b

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycles 1, 2 and 4 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
acMMAE: Cycle 1acMMAE: Cycle 2acMMAE: Cycle 4Total Ab: Cycle 1Total Ab: Cycle 2Total Ab: Cycle 4Unconjugated MMAE: Cycle 1
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in DLBCL72584172134.943.148.22.39
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in FL73881674938.745.044.22.17

[back to top]

Phase Ib: CL of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Rituximab in Cohort 1a

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
InterventionmL/day/kg (Geometric Mean)
acMMAETotal Ab
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in DLBCL15.28.48
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in FL11.36.05

[back to top]

Phase Ib: CL of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Obinutuzumab in Cohort 1b

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
InterventionmL/day/kg (Geometric Mean)
acMMAETotal Ab
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in DLBCL12.17.17
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in FL12.36.76

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Total Ab

PK of pola-related analyte Total Ab was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 2: pre-dose & 30 min post dose; Cycle 1 Days 8 & 15; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1 and unscheduled visits: pre-dose & 30 min post dose; Follow up at Day 1: Months 3, 6, 12, 18 & 24; study treatment completion visit (up to approx. 84 months)

Interventiongrams per milliliters (g/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseFollow up on Month 3, Day 1Follow up on Month 6, Day 1Follow up on Month 12, Day 1Follow up on Month 18, Day 1Follow up on Month 24, Day 1Study Treatment Completion Visit
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCLNA38.32.835.0337.50.5430.1500.02500.02500.02503.23

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Total Ab

PK of pola-related analyte Total Ab was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 2: pre-dose & 30 min post dose; Cycle 1 Days 8 & 15; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1 and unscheduled visits: pre-dose & 30 min post dose; Follow up at Day 1: Months 3, 6, 12, 18 & 24; study treatment completion visit (up to approx. 84 months)

Interventiongrams per milliliters (g/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseFollow up on Month 3, Day 1Follow up on Month 6, Day 1Follow up on Month 12, Day 1Follow up on Month 18, Day 1Unscheduled Visit: Pre-doseStudy Treatment Completion Visit
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FLNA35.41.233.6144.80.2650.05390.02500.02500.2793.34

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Total Ab

PK of pola-related analyte Total Ab was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 2: pre-dose & 30 min post dose; Cycle 1 Days 8 & 15; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1 and unscheduled visits: pre-dose & 30 min post dose; Follow up at Day 1: Months 3, 6, 12, 18 & 24; study treatment completion visit (up to approx. 84 months)

Interventiongrams per milliliters (g/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseFollow up on Month 3, Day 1Follow up on Month 6, Day 1Follow up on Month 12, Day 1Follow up on Month 18, Day 1Unscheduled VisitStudy Treatment Completion Visit
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FLNA32.42.204.8255.00.4890.09200.02500.02501.234.57

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Total Ab

PK of pola-related analyte Total Ab was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 2: pre-dose & 30 min post dose; Cycle 1 Days 8 & 15; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1 and unscheduled visits: pre-dose & 30 min post dose; Follow up at Day 1: Months 3, 6, 12, 18 & 24; study treatment completion visit (up to approx. 84 months)

Interventiongrams per milliliters (g/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseFollow up on Month 3, Day 1Follow up on Month 6, Day 1Follow up on Month 12, Day 1Unscheduled VisitUnscheduled Visit: Pre-doseUnscheduled Visit: 30 min Post DoseStudy Treatment Completion Visit
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCLNA34.62.485.7240.60.3160.05640.03011.650.025042.04.33

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Total Ab

PK of pola-related analyte Total Ab was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 2: pre-dose & 30 min post dose; Cycle 1 Days 8 & 15; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1 and unscheduled visits: pre-dose & 30 min post dose; Follow up at Day 1: Months 3, 6, 12, 18 & 24; study treatment completion visit (up to approx. 84 months)

Interventiongrams per milliliters (g/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 1 Day 8Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseFollow up on Month 3, Day 1Follow up on Month 6, Day 1Follow up on Month 12, Day 1Follow up on Month 18, Day 1Follow up on Month 24, Day 1Study Treatment Completion Visit
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in FLNA37.510.24.612.2043.44.6143.00.9100.2190.02980.02500.02505.34

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Total Ab

PK of pola-related analyte Total Ab was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 2: pre-dose & 30 min post dose; Cycle 1 Days 8 & 15; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1 and unscheduled visits: pre-dose & 30 min post dose; Follow up at Day 1: Months 3, 6, 12, 18 & 24; study treatment completion visit (up to approx. 84 months)

,,
Interventiongrams per milliliters (g/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: 30 min Post DoseCycle 1 Day 8Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: 30 min Post DoseFollow up on Month 3, Day 1Follow up on Month 6, Day 1Follow up on Month 12, Day 1Follow up on Month 18, Day 1Follow up on Month 24, Day 1Unscheduled Visit
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in DLBCLNA36.69.014.262.3139.55.0344.60.7710.07880.02500.02500.02500.0250
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in FLNA33.23.431.830.69635.83.4440.20.1640.02500.02500.02500.02500.0250
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in DLBCLNA34.310.05.223.7042.26.2647.10.3940.1040.02500.02500.02500.0250

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of Rituximab

Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. As pre specified in the protocol serum concentration of rituximab was not assessed in the Phase II NF Cohort (Arm G+H). (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1: pre-dose; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Days 1: Pre-doseCycle 1 Days 1: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Days 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Days 1: Pre-dose
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FLNA20220.262.3

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of Rituximab

Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. As pre specified in the protocol serum concentration of rituximab was not assessed in the Phase II NF Cohort (Arm G+H). (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1: pre-dose; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose (up to approximately 84 months)

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Days 1: Pre-doseCycle 1 Days 1: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Days 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Days 1: Pre-doseUnscheduled: Pre-dose
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FLNA18222.865.130.6
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCLNA18834.974.7298

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of Rituximab

Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts. As pre specified in the protocol serum concentration of rituximab was not assessed in the Phase II NF Cohort (Arm G+H). (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1: pre-dose and 30 min post dose; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1: pre-dose; unscheduled visits: pre-dose and 30 min post dose (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Days 1: Pre-doseCycle 1 Days 1: 30 min Post DoseCycle 2 Days 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Days 1: Pre-doseUnscheduled: Pre-doseUnscheduled: 30 min Post Dose
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCLNA18034.683.32.00165

[back to top]

Symptom Severity and Interference According to Therapy-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Score (TINAS) in Arms A-F

The TINAS is an 11-item questionnaire that assesses the severity of neuropathy-related symptoms in the last 24 hours. The 11 items assessed were: hot/burning sensations in hands/feet, sensations pins and needles arms/legs, numbness or tingling in hands/feet, sensations of electric shock, pain when touching cold things, cramps in hands/feet, discomfort when touching things, discomfort skin contact with something, trouble grasping small objects, trouble walking loss feeling legs/feet, difficulty balance loss feeling leg/feet. Each item was scored on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being the symptom is not present, and 10 being the symptom is as bad as the participant can imagine. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. Scores were averaged at each week. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Every week during treatment (up to 24 weeks) and for the first 2 months after treatment, thereafter every month for 10 months or until withdrawal (up to 18 months overall)

InterventionPoints on scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9Week 10Week 11Week 12Week 13Week 14Week 15Week 16Week 17Week 18Week 19Week 20Week 21Week 22Week 23Week 24Week 25Week 26Week 27Week 28Week 29Week 30Week 31Week 35Week 39Week 43End of Treatment
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL0.61.00.90.70.60.70.40.60.50.20.40.30.20.40.40.40.40.10.50.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.00.00.60.00.00.8

[back to top]

Symptom Severity and Interference According to Therapy-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Score (TINAS) in Arms A-F

The TINAS is an 11-item questionnaire that assesses the severity of neuropathy-related symptoms in the last 24 hours. The 11 items assessed were: hot/burning sensations in hands/feet, sensations pins and needles arms/legs, numbness or tingling in hands/feet, sensations of electric shock, pain when touching cold things, cramps in hands/feet, discomfort when touching things, discomfort skin contact with something, trouble grasping small objects, trouble walking loss feeling legs/feet, difficulty balance loss feeling leg/feet. Each item was scored on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being the symptom is not present, and 10 being the symptom is as bad as the participant can imagine. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. Scores were averaged at each week. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Every week during treatment (up to 24 weeks) and for the first 2 months after treatment, thereafter every month for 10 months or until withdrawal (up to 18 months overall)

InterventionPoints on scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9Week 10Week 11Week 12Week 13Week 14Week 15Week 16Week 17Week 18Week 19Week 20Week 21Week 22Week 23Week 24Week 25Week 26Week 27Week 28Week 29Week 30Week 31Week 32Week 33Week 34Week 35Week 36Week 37Week 38Week 39Week 40Week 41Week 42Week 43Week 44Week 45Week 46Week 47Week 48Week 49Week 50Week 51Week 52Week 53Week 54Week 55Week 56Week 57Week 59Week 61Week 63Week 64Week 65Week 69Week 72Week 73End of Treatment
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FL0.50.50.70.80.60.80.90.80.50.40.50.90.60.70.70.80.80.70.80.80.90.80.81.00.23.31.11.20.80.70.00.10.11.30.00.20.10.10.00.00.70.00.00.00.10.10.00.80.00.10.00.40.70.00.20.20.00.00.30.01.10.00.31.20.00.6

[back to top]

Symptom Severity and Interference According to Therapy-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Score (TINAS) in Arms A-F

The TINAS is an 11-item questionnaire that assesses the severity of neuropathy-related symptoms in the last 24 hours. The 11 items assessed were: hot/burning sensations in hands/feet, sensations pins and needles arms/legs, numbness or tingling in hands/feet, sensations of electric shock, pain when touching cold things, cramps in hands/feet, discomfort when touching things, discomfort skin contact with something, trouble grasping small objects, trouble walking loss feeling legs/feet, difficulty balance loss feeling leg/feet. Each item was scored on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being the symptom is not present, and 10 being the symptom is as bad as the participant can imagine. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. Scores were averaged at each week. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Every week during treatment (up to 24 weeks) and for the first 2 months after treatment, thereafter every month for 10 months or until withdrawal (up to 18 months overall)

InterventionPoints on scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9Week 10Week 11Week 12Week 13Week 14Week 15Week 16Week 17Week 18Week 19Week 20Week 21Week 22Week 23Week 24Week 25Week 26Week 27Week 28Week 29Week 30Week 31Week 32Week 33Week 34Week 35Week 36Week 37Week 38Week 39Week 40Week 41Week 42Week 43Week 44Week 45Week 46Week 47Week 49Week 50Week 51Week 52Week 53Week 54Week 55Week 56Week 57Week 58Week 59Week 60Week 61Week 62Week 63Week 64Week 65Week 66Week 67Week 69Week 70Week 71Week 73Week 74Week 75Week 78Week 80Week 84Week 86Week 90End of Treatment
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL0.20.30.30.20.10.20.20.30.30.40.50.50.50.70.60.20.40.20.20.20.00.30.20.20.40.20.60.30.50.20.70.30.40.30.20.30.50.40.40.70.50.60.50.31.60.81.10.40.61.00.10.40.20.80.30.60.30.70.00.40.40.70.40.40.20.60.20.20.70.10.41.30.20.70.00.00.60.70.4

[back to top]

Symptom Severity and Interference According to Therapy-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Score (TINAS) in Arms A-F

The TINAS is an 11-item questionnaire that assesses the severity of neuropathy-related symptoms in the last 24 hours. The 11 items assessed were: hot/burning sensations in hands/feet, sensations pins and needles arms/legs, numbness or tingling in hands/feet, sensations of electric shock, pain when touching cold things, cramps in hands/feet, discomfort when touching things, discomfort skin contact with something, trouble grasping small objects, trouble walking loss feeling legs/feet, difficulty balance loss feeling leg/feet. Each item was scored on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being the symptom is not present, and 10 being the symptom is as bad as the participant can imagine. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. Scores were averaged at each week. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Every week during treatment (up to 24 weeks) and for the first 2 months after treatment, thereafter every month for 10 months or until withdrawal (up to 18 months overall)

InterventionPoints on scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9Week 10Week 11Week 12Week 13Week 14Week 15Week 16Week 17Week 18Week 19Week 20Week 21Week 22Week 23Week 24Week 25Week 26Week 27Week 28Week 29Week 30Week 31Week 32Week 33Week 34Week 35Week 36Week 37Week 38Week 39Week 40Week 41Week 42Week 43Week 44Week 45Week 46Week 47Week 48Week 49Week 50Week 51Week 52Week 53Week 54Week 55Week 56Week 57Week 58Week 59Week 60Week 61Week 62Week 63Week 64Week 65Week 66Week 67Week 68Week 69Week 70Week 71Week 72Week 73Week 74Week 75Week 76Week 77Week 78Week 79Week 80Week 81Week 82Week 83Week 84Week 85Week 86Week 94Week 95Week 96Week 98Week 99Week 100Week 102Week 103Week 104Week 105End of Treatment
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL0.40.30.10.30.30.30.20.20.20.10.20.30.30.30.40.40.50.30.40.60.50.90.60.50.30.40.50.50.70.81.31.01.00.81.21.21.11.51.50.91.40.30.60.21.00.20.10.21.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.01.50.00.00.01.50.00.00.10.80.00.00.01.50.00.00.01.30.00.00.71.51.41.41.10.60.60.60.60.60.60.00.50.00.00.10.30.20.30.20.10.5

[back to top]

Phase Ib: AUCinf of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Obinutuzumab in Cohort 1b

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
Interventionday*ug/mL (Geometric Mean)
acMMAETotal Ab
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in DLBCL2650252
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in FL2600267

[back to top]

Phase Ib: AUC From Time Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) of Polatuzumab Vedotin, Bendamustine, and Rituximab in Cohort 1a

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. The unit of measure for AUC is day*micrograms per milliliter [day*ug/mL]). (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts)

,
Interventionday*ug/mL (Geometric Mean)
acMMAETotal Ab
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in DLBCL2110214
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in FL2830298

[back to top]

Cohort 1b (Phase Ib): Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent ADAs to Polatuzumab Vedotin and Obinutuzumab

"The number of participants with positive results for ADA against pola and obinutuzumab at Baseline and at any of the post-baseline assessment time-points were reported. Participants positive at any post-baseline time points were post-baseline evaluable participants determined to have Treatment-induced ADAs or Treatment-enhanced ADA during the study period. Treatment-induced ADA = negative or missing baseline ADA result(s) and at least one positive post-baseline ADA result. Treatment-enhanced ADA = a participant with positive ADA result at baseline who has one or more post-baseline titer results that are at least 0.60 t.u. greater than the baseline titer result. Treatment emergent ADA is the sum of treatment-induced ADAs and treatment enhanced ADAs. Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number." (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately Month 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline Prevalence of ADAs to Polatuzumab vedotinPost-Baseline Incidence of ADAs to Polatuzumab vedotinBaseline Prevalence of ADAs to ObinutuzumabPost-Baseline Incidence of ADA to Obinutuzumab
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in DLBCL0000
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in FL0000

[back to top]

Cohort 1a (Phase Ib): Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Polatuzumab Vedotin

"The number of participants with positive results for ADA against pola at Baseline and at any of the post-baseline assessment time-points were reported. Participants positive at any post-baseline time points were post-baseline evaluable participants determined to have Treatment-induced ADAs or Treatment-enhanced ADA during the study period. Treatment-induced ADA = negative or missing baseline ADA result(s) and at least one positive post-baseline ADA result. Treatment-enhanced ADA = a participant with positive ADA result at baseline who has one or more post-baseline titer results that are at least 0.60 titer unit (t.u.) greater than the baseline titer result. Treatment emergent ADA is the sum of treatment-induced ADAs and treatment enhanced ADAs. Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number." (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately Month 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline Prevalence of ADAsPost-Baseline Incidence of ADAs
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in DLBCL33.333.3
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in FL50.00

[back to top]

Arms G+H: (Phase II NF Cohorts): Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent ADAs to Polatuzumab Vedotin (Lyophilized)

"The number of participants with positive results for ADA against lyophilized pola at Baseline and at any of the post-baseline assessment time-points were reported. Participants positive at any post-baseline time points were post-baseline evaluable participants determined to have Treatment-induced ADAs or Treatment-enhanced ADA during the study period. Treatment-induced ADA = negative or missing baseline ADA result(s) and at least one positive post-baseline ADA result. Treatment-enhanced ADA = a participant with positive ADA result at baseline who has one or more post-baseline titer results that are at least 0.60 t.u. greater than the baseline titer result. Treatment emergent ADA is the sum of treatment-induced ADAs and treatment enhanced ADAs. Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number." (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: From Month 37 to Month 84 (up to approximately 47 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline Prevalence of ADAs to PolatuzumabPost-Baseline Incidence of ADAs to Polatuzumab
Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL0.02.6
Arm H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL1.65.0

[back to top]

Arms E and F (Phase II): Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent ADAs to Polatuzumab Vedotin and Obinutuzumab

"The number of participants with positive results for ADA against pola and obinutuzumab at Baseline and at any of the post-baseline assessment time-points were reported. Participants positive at any post-baseline time points were post-baseline evaluable participants determined to have Treatment-induced ADAs or Treatment-enhanced ADA during the study period. Treatment-induced ADA = negative or missing baseline ADA result(s) and at least one positive post-baseline ADA result. Treatment-enhanced ADA = a participant with positive ADA result at baseline who has one or more post-baseline titer results that are at least 0.60 t.u. greater than the baseline titer result. Treatment emergent ADA is the sum of treatment-induced ADAs and treatment enhanced ADAs. Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number." (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Baseline to approximately Month 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline Prevalence of ADAs to PolatuzumabPost-Baseline Incidence of ADAs to PolatuzumabBaseline Prevalence of ADAs to ObinutuzumabPost-Baseline Incidence of ADAs to Obinutuzumab
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL05.300
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL05.600

[back to top]

Arms A and C (Phase II): Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent ADAs to Polatuzumab Vedotin

"The number of participants with positive results for ADA against pola at Baseline and at any of the post-baseline assessment time-points were reported. Participants positive at any post-baseline time points were post-baseline evaluable participants determined to have Treatment-induced ADAs or Treatment-enhanced ADA during the study period. Treatment-induced ADA = negative or missing baseline ADA result(s) and at least one positive post-baseline ADA result. Treatment-enhanced ADA = a participant with positive ADA result at baseline who has one or more post-baseline titer results that are at least 0.60 t.u. greater than the baseline titer result. Treatment emergent ADA is the sum of treatment-induced ADAs and treatment enhanced ADAs. Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number." (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Baseline to approximately Month 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline Prevalence of ADAsPost-Baseline Incidence of ADAs
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL07.9
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL02.9

[back to top]

Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohorts): Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Unconjugated MMAE

PK of one pola-related analytes: Unconjugated MMAE was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts. As pre-specified in the protocol data is reported combined for arms G+H. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: post dose; Cycle 1 and 3 Day 8 and 15; Cycle 2, 3 and 4 Day 1: pre-dose and post dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: Post DoseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Post Dose
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL0.5900.2290.3160.1860.256

[back to top]

Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohorts): Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: Total Ab

PK of pola-related analyte: Total Ab was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts. As pre-specified in the protocol data is reported combined for arms G+H. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: post dose; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1: pre-dose and post dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: Post DoseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Post Dose
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL33.93.2736.05.4139.2

[back to top]

Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohorts): Plasma Concentration of of Polatuzumab Vedotin Analyte: acMMAE

PK of one pola-related analytes: acMMAE was measured. Cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts. As pre-specified in the protocol data is reported combined for arms G+H. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2: post dose; Cycle 2 and 4 Day 1: pre-dose and post dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Post DoseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: Post DoseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Post Dose
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL65314.666723.2659

[back to top]

Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Polatuzumab Vedotin (Lyophilized)

PK of three pola-related analytes: acMMAE, total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Days 2, 8 and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2 and 4,(cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts) up to approximately 9 weeks

Interventionnanograms per milliliters (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
acMMAEMMAE
Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL7242.01

[back to top]

Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Area Under Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Polatuzumab Vedotin (Lyophilized)

Pharmacokinetic (PK) of three pola-related analytes: antibody conjugated monomethyl auristatin E (acMMAE), total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE were measured. The unit of measure for AUC is nanograms*day per milliliters. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Days 2, 8 and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2 and 4, (each cycle is 21 days DLBCL cohorts) up to approximately 9 weeks

Interventionng*day/mL (Geometric Mean)
acMMAEMMAE
Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL288021.6

[back to top]

Phase II: Percentage of Participants With OR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by IRC

OR at PRA was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR at the PRA, as assessed by the IRC according to MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on PET-CT= complete MR in lymph nodes and ELS with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass on 5PS, where 1=no uptake above background; 2=uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3=uptake mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4=uptake moderately > liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. Bone marrow normal by morphology; if indeterminate, IHC negative. PR based on PET-CT was defined as partial MR in lymph nodes and ELS with a score of 4 or 5 with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size at interim, residual uptake higher than uptake in normal bone marrow but reduced compared with baseline (diffuse uptake compatible with reactive changes from chemotherapy allowed). (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 28 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL76.9
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FL73.2
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL42.5
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL17.5
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL85.0
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL38.1
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL43.4

[back to top]

Phase II: Percentage of Participants With OR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by IRC

OR at PRA was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR at the PRA, as assessed by the IRC based on MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and ELS with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi and no ELS of disease organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; bone marrow normal by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. PR per CT only was defined as partial remission in lymph nodes and ELS with ≥50% decrease SPD of up to 6 target measurable lymph nodes and extranodal sites, absent/normal/regressed but with no increase in non-measured lesions, spleen regressing by ≥50% in length beyond normal it, no new sites of lesions. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts). (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 28 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL74.4
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FL80.5
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL40.0
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL15.0
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL80.0
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL38.1
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL41.5

[back to top]

Symptom Severity and Interference According to Therapy-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Score (TINAS) in Arms A-F

The TINAS is an 11-item questionnaire that assesses the severity of neuropathy-related symptoms in the last 24 hours. The 11 items assessed were: hot/burning sensations in hands/feet, sensations pins and needles arms/legs, numbness or tingling in hands/feet, sensations of electric shock, pain when touching cold things, cramps in hands/feet, discomfort when touching things, discomfort skin contact with something, trouble grasping small objects, trouble walking loss feeling legs/feet, difficulty balance loss feeling leg/feet. Each item was scored on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being the symptom is not present, and 10 being the symptom is as bad as the participant can imagine. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. Scores were averaged at each week. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Every week during treatment (up to 24 weeks) and for the first 2 months after treatment, thereafter every month for 10 months or until withdrawal (up to 18 months overall)

InterventionPoints on scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9Week 10Week 11Week 12Week 13Week 14Week 15Week 16Week 17Week 18Week 19Week 20Week 21Week 22Week 23Week 24Week 25Week 27Week 28Week 29Week 30Week 31Week 32Week 33Week 34Week 35Week 36Week 37Week 38Week 39Week 40Week 41Week 42Week 43Week 44Week 45Week 46Week 47Week 48Week 49Week 50Week 51Week 52Week 53Week 54Week 55Week 57Week 58Week 59Week 61Week 62Week 63Week 64Week 65Week 66Week 67Week 68Week 69Week 70Week 71Week 72Week 73Week 74Week 75Week 76Week 77Week 79Week 80Week 83Week 85Week 86Week 89Week 90Week 91Week 92Week 93Week 94Week 95Week 96Week 97Week 98Week 99Week 100Week 101Week 102Week 103Week 104Week 105Week 107Week 108End of Treatment
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL0.80.00.20.00.20.10.10.00.20.10.10.10.20.30.20.90.30.30.30.30.30.30.50.50.30.10.40.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.40.10.20.30.30.10.30.50.40.70.30.50.80.60.30.50.50.50.20.50.50.20.60.60.30.60.80.70.00.80.91.20.01.00.80.90.00.81.10.60.90.80.80.80.60.60.70.70.70.70.70.70.70.80.70.70.70.70.70.70.70.70.80.70.70.1

[back to top]

Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by Investigator

OR at PRA was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR at the PRA, as assessed by the investigator according to MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on PET-CT complete MR in lymph nodes and ELS with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass on 5PS, where 1=no uptake above background; 2=uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3=uptake mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4=uptake moderately > liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow, normal by morphology; if indeterminate, IHC negative. PR based on PET-CT was defined as partial MR in lymph nodes and ELS with a score of 4 or 5 with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size at interim, residual uptake higher than uptake in normal bone marrow but reduced compared with baseline (diffuse uptake compatible with reactive changes from chemotherapy allowed). (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length 21 for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 28 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL79.5
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FL80.5
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL47.5
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL17.5
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL85.0
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL33.3
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL42.5

[back to top]

Phase II: Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by the Investigator

CR was assessed by investigator at PRA according to MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on PET-CT was defined as complete MR in lymph nodes and ELS with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5PS where 1=no uptake above background; 2=uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3=uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4=uptake moderately > liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. Bone marrow is normal by morphology; if indeterminate, IHC negative. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts) or after final dose of study treatment. As pre-specified in the protocol data reported is combined for Arms G and H. Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 28 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL64.1
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FL63.4
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL42.5
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL15.0
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL65.0
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL33.3
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL36.8

[back to top]

Phase II: Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by IRC

CR was determined by IRC a at PRA according to the MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and ELS with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi and no ELS of disease organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts). As pre-specified in the protocol data reported is combined for Arms G and H. Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 28 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL41.0
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FL36.6
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL22.5
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL2.5
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL50.0
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL23.8
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL17.9

[back to top]

Phase II: Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on CT Only as Determined by Investigator

CR was determined by investigator at PRA according to the MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and ELS with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 centimetres (cm) in in longest transverse diameter (LDi) and no ELS of disease organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts). As pre-specified in the protocol data reported is combined for Arms G and H. Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 28 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL46.2
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FL19.5
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL20.0
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL5.0
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL20.0
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL14.3
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL14.2

[back to top]

Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Best Objective Response (BOR) Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the Investigator

BOR=CR/PR per PET-CT/CT per MLRC.CR per PET-CT=complete MR in LN & ELS, score=1, 2,3 with/without a residual mass on 5-PS; 1=no uptake(UT) above background;2=UT≤mediastinum;3=UT>mediastinum but ≤liver;4=UT moderately>liver;5=UT markedly higher than liver &/or new lesions;no evidence of FDG-avid disease, bone marrow morphology=normal;if indeterminate, is IHC negative.PR per PET-CT=partial MR in LN & ELS, score=4 or 5, reduced UT than baseline (BL) & residual mass of any size;residual UT>UT in normal marrow but reduced than BL.CR per CT=complete radiologic response with target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5cm in LDi & no ELS of disease, absences of non-measured lesion;organ enlargement regressed to normal;no new lesions;bone marrow= normal;if indeterminate, is IHC negative.PR per CT=≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target nodes & extranodal sites;non-measured lesions=absent/normal/regressed/no increase;spleen=regressed by ≥50% in length beyond normal, no new lesions. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Up to every 6 months until disease progression, withdrawal or study completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL89.7
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FL90.2
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL70.0
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL32.5
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL90.0
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL52.4
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL62.3

[back to top]

Phase II: Percentage of Participants With AEs

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as AEs. AEs were reported based on the NCI-CTCAE, v4.0. As pre-specified in the protocol data reported is combined for Arms G and H. Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: From the study start up to the end of the study (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL100
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FL100
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL100
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL97.4
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL100
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL100
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL99.1

[back to top]

Phase II Randomized and NF Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at Primary Response Assessment (PRA) Based on Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-Computed Tomography (CT) Scan as Determined by Independent Review Committee (IRC)

CR was assessed by IRC at PRA according to Modified Lugano Response Criteria (MLRC). Per MLRC, CR based on PET-CT was defined as complete metabolic response (MR) in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites (ELS) with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5-point scale (5PS) where 1=no uptake above background; 2=uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3=uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4=uptake moderately > liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow. Bone marrow is normal by morphology; if indeterminate, immunohistochemistry (IHC) negative. As pre-specified in the protocol data reported is combined for Arms G and H. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts) or after final dose of study treatment. Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 28 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in FL69.2
Arm B (Phase II Randomization): BR in FL63.4
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL42.5
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL17.5
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL39.6

[back to top]

Phase II NF Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With BOR Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the IRC

BOR=CR/PR per PET-CT/CT per MLRC. CR per PET-CT=complete MR in lymph nodes & ELS, score=1, 2,3 with/without a residual mass on 5-PS; 1=no UT above background; 2=UT≤mediastinum;3=UT>mediastinum but ≤liver;4=UT moderately>liver;5=UT markedly higher than liver &/or new lesions;no evidence of FDG-avid disease, bone marrow morphology=normal;if indeterminate, is IHC negative.PR per PET-CT=partial MR in lymph nodes & ELS, score=4 or 5, reduced UT than BL & residual mass of any size;residual UT>UT in normal marrow but reduced than BL.CR per CT=complete radiologic response with target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5cm in LDi & no ELS of disease, absences of non-measured lesion;organ enlargement regressed to normal;no new lesions;bone marrow= normal;if indeterminate, is IHC negative.PR per CT=≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target nodes & extranodal sites;non-measured lesions=absent/normal/regressed/no increase;spleen=regressed by ≥50% in length beyond normal, no new lesions. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Up to every 6 months until disease progression, withdrawal or study completion (from Month 37 to Month 84 [up to approximately 47 months])

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL57.5

[back to top]

Phase II NF Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With BOR Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the Investigator

BOR=CR/PR per PET-CT/CT per MLRC. CR per PET-CT=complete MR in lymph nodes & ELS, score=1, 2,3 with/without a residual mass on 5-PS; 1=no UT above background; 2=UT≤mediastinum;3=UT>mediastinum but ≤liver;4=UT moderately>liver;5=UT markedly higher than liver &/or new lesions;no evidence of FDG-avid disease, bone marrow morphology=normal;if indeterminate, is IHC negative.PR per PET-CT=partial MR in lymph nodes & ELS, score=4 or 5, reduced UT than BL & residual mass of any size;residual UT>UT in normal marrow but reduced than BL.CR per CT=complete radiologic response with target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5cm in LDi & no ELS of disease, absences of non-measured lesion;organ enlargement regressed to normal;no new lesions;bone marrow= normal;if indeterminate, is IHC negative.PR per CT=≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target nodes & extranodal sites;non-measured lesions=absent/normal/regressed/no increase;spleen=regressed by ≥50% in length beyond normal, no new lesions. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Up to every 6 months until disease progression, withdrawal or study completion (from Month 37 to Month 84 [up to approximately 47 months])

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL62.3

[back to top]

Phase II NF Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization or first treatment (for obinutuzumab arms) to the date of death from any cause. As pre-specified in the protocol data reported is combined for Arms G and H. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: From Month 37 to Month 84 (up to approximately 47 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL12.320

[back to top]

Phase II NF Cohort: PFS Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the IRC

PFS was defined as the time from randomization or from first study treatment (for obinuzumab arms) to the first occurrence of disease progression, relapse or death, from any cause based on PET-CT or CT only, as determined by the IRC assessment. As pre-specified in the protocol data reported is combined for Arms G and H. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization or first treatment to the first occurrence of progression or relapse, or death from any cause (from Month 37 to Month 84 [up to approximately 47 months])

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL6.965

[back to top]

Phase II NF Cohort: PFS Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the Investigator

PFS was defined as the time from randomization or from first study treatment (for obinuzumab arms) to the first occurrence of disease progression, relapse or death, from any cause based on PET-CT or CT only, as determined by the investigators assessment. As pre-specified in the protocol data reported is combined for Arms G and H. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization or first treatment to the first occurrence of progression or relapse, or death from any cause (from Month 37 to Month 84 [up to approximately 47 months])

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL5.881

[back to top]

Phase II NF Cohort: Percentage of Participants With OR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by IRC

OR at PRA was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR at the PRA, as assessed by the IRC according to MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on PET-CT= complete MR in lymph nodes and ELS with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass on 5PS, where 1=no uptake above background; 2=uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3=uptake mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4=uptake moderately > liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions ; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow, bone marrow normal by morphology; if indeterminate, IHC negative. PR based on PET-CT was defined as partial MR in lymph nodes and ELS with a score of 4 or 5 with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size at interim, residual uptake higher than uptake in normal bone marrow but reduced compared with baseline (diffuse uptake compatible with reactive changes from chemotherapy allowed). (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 23 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL43.4

[back to top]

Phase II NF Cohort: Percentage of Participants With OR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by Investigator

OR at PRA was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR at the PRA, as assessed by the investigator according to MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on PET-CT= complete MR in lymph nodes and ELS with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass on 5PS, where 1=no uptake above background; 2=uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3=uptake mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4=uptake moderately>liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions ; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow, normal by morphology; if indeterminate, IHC negative. PR based on PET-CT was defined as partial MR in lymph nodes and ELS with a score of 4 or 5 with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size at interim, residual uptake higher than uptake in normal bone marrow but reduced compared with baseline (diffuse uptake compatible with reactive changes from chemotherapy allowed). (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 23 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL42.5

[back to top]

Phase II NF Cohort: Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by the Investigator

CR was assessed by Investigator at PRA according to MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on PET-CT was defined as complete MR in lymph nodes and ELS with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5PS where 1=no uptake above background; 2=uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3=uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4=uptake moderately > liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. Bone marrow is normal by morphology; if indeterminate, IHC negative. As pre-specified in the protocol data reported is combined for Arms G and H. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts) or after final dose of study treatment. Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length 21 days for DLBCL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 23 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL36.8

[back to top]

Phase II NF Cohort: Event-Free Survival (EFS) Based on PET-CT or CT Only, as Determined by the Investigator

EFS was defined as time from randomization to disease progression or relapse, as assessed by the investigator or death from any cause. As pre-specified in the protocol data reported is combined for Arms G and H. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: From Month 37 to Month 84 (up to approximately 47 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL5.092

[back to top]

Phase II NF Cohort: DOR Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the IRC

DOR=first occurrence of CR/PR to disease progression/relapse/death per PET-CT/CT, per IRC per MLRC.CR per PET-CT=score 1/2/3 with/without a residual mass on 5-PS for LN and ELS;1=no UT> background; 2=UT≤mediastinum;3=UT>mediastinum but ≤liver;4=UT moderately>liver;5=UT>than liver &/or new lesions;bone marrow morphology=no evidence of FDG-avid disease, normal;if indeterminate IHC negative.PR per PET-CT=score of 4/5 with reduced UT compared to BL & residual mass of any size at interim for LN & ELS;residual UT>UT in normal bone marrow butNCT02257567)
Timeframe: From the date of the first occurrence of a documented CR or PR to the date of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause whichever occur first (from Month 37 to Month 84 [up to approximately 47 months])

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL13.437

[back to top]

Phase II NF Cohort: DOR Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the Investigator

DOR=first occurrence of CR/PR to disease progression/relapse/death per PET-CT/CT, per investigator per MLRC.CR per PET-CT=score 1/2/3 with/without a residual mass on 5-PS for LN and ELS;1=no UT> background; 2=UT≤mediastinum;3=UT>mediastinum but ≤liver;4=UT moderately>liver;5=UT>than liver &/or new lesions;bone marrow morphology=no evidence of FDG-avid disease, normal;if indeterminate IHC negative.PR per PET-CT=score of 4/5 with reduced UT compared to BL & residual mass of any size at interim for LN & ELS;residual UT>UT in normal bone marrow butNCT02257567)
Timeframe: From the date of the first occurrence of a documented CR or PR to the date of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause whichever occur first (from Month 37 to Month 84 [up to approximately 47 months])

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL11.335

[back to top]

Phase II Expansion Cohorts and Arm G (Phase II NF Cohort): Percentage of Participants With CR at PRA Based on PET-CT as Determined by the IRC

CR was assessed by IRC at PRA according to MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on PET-CT was defined as complete MR in lymph nodes and ELS with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5PS where 1=no uptake above background; 2=uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3=uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4=uptake moderately > liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. Bone marrow is normal by morphology; if indeterminate, IHC negative. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts) or after final dose of study treatment. Values have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks after Cycle 6 Day 1 (cycle length 21 days for DLBCL cohorts and 28 days for FL cohorts) or last dose of study drug (up to approximately 28 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm E (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in FL65.0
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL33.3
Arm G (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BR in DLBCL35.7

[back to top]

Phase Ib: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. AEs were reported based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs, version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE, v4.0). (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: From the study start up to the end of the study (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in FL100
Cohort 1a (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BR in DLBCL100
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in FL100
Cohort 1b (Phase Ib Safety Run-In): Pola+BG in DLBCL100

[back to top]

DLBCL Cohorts: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the Investigator

PFS was defined as the time randomization or from first study treatment (for obinuzumab arms) to the first occurrence of disease progression, relapse or death, from any cause based on PET-CT or CT only, as determined by the investigators assessment. As pre-specified in the protocol data reported is combined for Arms G and H. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization or first treatment to the first occurrence of progression or relapse, or death from any cause (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL7.491
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL2.037
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL5.125
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL5.881

[back to top]

DLBCL Cohorts: PFS Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the IRC

PFS was defined as the time randomization or from first study treatment (for obinuzumab arms) to the first occurrence of disease progression, relapse or death, from any cause based on PET-CT or CT only, as determined by the IRC assessment. As pre-specified in the protocol data reported is combined for Arms G and H. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization or first treatment to the first occurrence of progression or relapse, or death from any cause (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL9.248
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL3.713
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL5.848
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL6.965

[back to top]

DLBCL Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With BOR Based PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by IRC

BOR=CR/PR per PET-CT/CT per MLRC.CR per PET-CT=complete MR in LN & ELS, score=1, 2,3 with/without a residual mass on 5-PS; 1=no uptake(UT) above background;2=UT≤mediastinum;3=UT>mediastinum but ≤liver;4=UT moderately>liver;5=UT markedly higher than liver &/or new lesions;no evidence of FDG-avid disease, bone marrow morphology=normal;if indeterminate, is IHC negative.PR per PET-CT=partial MR in LN & ELS, score=4 or 5, reduced UT than baseline (BL) & residual mass of any size;residual UT>UT in normal marrow but reduced than BL.CR per CT=complete radiologic response with target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤1.5cm in LDi & no ELS of disease, absences of non-measured lesion;organ enlargement regressed to normal;no new lesions;bone marrow= normal;if indeterminate, is IHC negative.PR per CT=≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target nodes & extranodal sites;non-measured lesions=absent/normal/regressed/no increase;spleen=regressed by ≥50% in length beyond normal, no new lesions. (NCT02257567)
Timeframe: Up to every 6 months until disease progression, withdrawal or study completion (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL62.5
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL25.0
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL42.9
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL57.5

[back to top]

DLBCL Cohorts: Duration of Response (DOR) Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the Investigator

DOR=first occurrence of CR/PR to disease progression/relapse/death per PET-CT/CT, per investigator per MLRC.CR per PET-CT=score 1/2/3 with/without a residual mass on 5-PS for LN and ELS;1=no UT> background; 2=UT≤mediastinum;3=UT>mediastinum but ≤liver;4=UT moderately>liver;5=UT>than liver &/or new lesions;bone marrow morphology=no evidence of FDG-avid disease, normal;if indeterminate IHC negative.PR per PET-CT=score of 4/5 with reduced UT compared to BL & residual mass of any size at interim for LN & ELS;residual UT>UT in normal bone marrow butNCT02257567)
Timeframe: From the date of the first occurrence of a documented CR or PR to the date of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause whichever occur first (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL12.665
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL4.074
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL16.099
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL11.335

[back to top]

DLBCL Cohorts: DOR Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Determined by the IRC

DOR=first occurrence of CR/PR to disease progression/relapse/death per PET-CT/CT, per IRC per MLRC.CR per PET-CT=score 1/2/3 with/without a residual mass on 5-PS for LN and ELS;1=no UT> background; 2=UT≤mediastinum;3=UT>mediastinum but ≤liver;4=UT moderately>liver;5=UT>than liver &/or new lesions;bone marrow morphology=no evidence of FDG-avid disease, normal;if indeterminate IHC negative.PR per PET-CT=score of 4/5 with reduced UT compared to BL & residual mass of any size at interim for LN & ELS;residual UT>UT in normal bone marrow butNCT02257567)
Timeframe: From the date of the first occurrence of a documented CR or PR to the date of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause whichever occur first (up to approximately 84 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm C (Phase II Randomization): Pola+BR in DLBCL10.908
Arm D (Phase II Randomization): BR in DLBCL10.645
Arm F (Phase II Expansion): Pola+BG in DLBCL25.758
Arm G+H (Phase II NF Cohort): Pola+BR in DLBCL13.437

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 16 (QLQ-CLL16) Score

The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 16 (QLQ-CLL16) module included assessments of fatigue, treatment side effects, disease symptoms, infection, social activities, and future health worries. Final scores are transformed such that they range from 0 - 100, whereby higher scores indicate greater functioning, greater quality of life, or a greater degree of symptoms, with changes of 5 - 10 points considered to be a minimally important difference to participants. A positive change from Day 1, Cycle 1 (baseline) indicates improvement. EOT=end of treatment. (NCT02320487)
Timeframe: Day 1 Cycles 1 (baseline), 3, 6; end of treatment, 2 months after last dose, every 3 months thereafter for 2 years (up to 46 months) (1 cycle = 28 days)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Fatigue: Cycle 3Fatigue: Cycle 6Fatigue: EOT/Early DiscontinuationFatigue: Response VisitFatigue: 3-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 6-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 9-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 12-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 15-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 18-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 21-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 24-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 27-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 30-Month Follow-UpSide Effects: Cycle 3Side Effects: Cycle 6Side Effects: EOT/Early DiscontinuationSide Effects: Response VisitSide Effects: 3-Month Follow-UpSide Effects: 6-Month Follow-UpSide Effects: 9-Month Follow-UpSide Effects: 12-Month Follow-UpSide Effects: 15-Month Follow-UpSide Effects: 18-Month Follow-UpSide Effects: 21-Month Follow-UpSide Effects: 24-Month Follow-UpSide Effects: 27-Month Follow-UpSide Effects: 30-Month Follow-UpDisease Symptoms: Cycle 3Disease Symptoms: Cycle 6Disease Symptoms: EOT/Early DiscontinuationDisease Symptoms: Response VisitDisease Symptoms: 3-Month Follow-UpDisease Symptoms: 6-Month Follow-UpDisease Symptoms: 9-Month Follow-UpDisease Symptoms: 12-Month Follow-UpDisease Symptoms: 15-Month Follow-UpDisease Symptoms: 18-Month Follow-UpDisease Symptoms: 21-Month Follow-UpDisease Symptoms: 24-Month Follow-UpDisease Symptoms: 27-Month Follow-UpDisease Symptoms: 30-Month Follow-UpInfection: Cycle 3Infection: Cycle 6Infection: EOT/Early DiscontinuationInfection: Response VisitInfection: 3-Month Follow-UpInfection: 6-Month Follow-UpInfection: 9-Month Follow-UpInfection: 12-Month Follow-UpInfection: 15-Month Follow-UpInfection: 18-Month Follow-UpInfection: 21-Month Follow-UpInfection: 24-Month Follow-UpInfection: 27-Month Follow-UpInfection: 30-Month Follow-UpSocial Activities: Cycle 3Social Activities: Cycle 6Social Activities: EOT/Early Discont.Social Activities: Response VisitSocial Activities: 3-Month Follow-UpSocial Activities: 6-Month Follow-UpSocial Activities: 9-Month Follow-UpSocial Activities: 12-Month Follow-UpSocial Activities: 15-Month Follow-UpSocial Activities: 18-Month Follow-UpSocial Activities: 21-Month Follow-UpSocial Activities: 24-Month Follow-UpSocial Activities: 27-Month Follow-UpSocial Activities: 30-Month Follow-UpFuture Health Worries: Cycle 3Future Health Worries: Cycle 6Future Health Worries: EOT/Early Discont.Future Health Worries: Response VisitFuture Health Worries: 3-Month Follow-UpFuture Health Worries: 6-Month Follow-UpFuture Health Worries: 9-Month Follow-UpFuture Health Worries: 12-Month Follow-UpFuture Health Worries: 15-Month Follow-UpFuture Health Worries: 18-Month Follow-UpFuture Health Worries: 21-Month Follow-UpFuture Health Worries: 24-Month Follow-UpFuture Health Worries: 27-Month Follow-UpFuture Health Worries: 30-Month Follow-Up
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine (BG)-12.02-10.17-12.87-21.23-20.04-17.44-22.77-17.32-14.52-15.49-16.42-24.70-19.56-6.671.520.07-0.67-2.08-3.30-2.61-3.36-2.27-3.17-4.54-1.66-3.08-2.96-11.67-9.56-8.30-10.02-12.67-12.20-10.13-12.28-8.62-9.05-10.41-9.16-10.71-11.41-5.006.204.111.650.762.593.461.454.422.862.622.780.891.45-5.00-3.92-3.95-6.41-9.24-11.87-4.69-13.33-7.89-6.76-5.71-4.55-11.51-9.420.00-20.08-14.04-18.57-20.24-25.11-17.44-23.47-19.23-17.14-19.72-21.21-21.82-25.36-6.67

[back to top]

Time to MRD-Negative Status in Peripheral Blood

MRD was assessed by 4-color flow cytometry, using iwCLL criteria for MRD negativity if the value is <10^-4 (<1 CLL cell detected in 10,000 leukocytes) in peripheral blood. Flow cytometry provides rapid analysis of multiple characteristics of single cells by using light to count and profile cells in a fluid mixture. Time to MRD-negative status is defined as the time between MRD positivity (>= 10^-4) or the time of first dose treatment for patients who were missing MRD status assessment at baseline to the first achievement of MRD negativity in the peripheral blood. (NCT02320487)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 46 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine (BG)8.2

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS), as Determined by the Investigator Using iwCLL NCI-WG Guidelines

PFS was defined as the time from the start of induction treatment (Day 1) to the first occurrence of disease progression, relapse as determined by the investigator using iwCLL NCI WG guidelines, or death (within 28 days after the last dose of study drug), whichever occurred first. Disease progression: at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy; increase in the liver or spleen size by 50% or more or the appearance of hepatomegaly or splenomegaly; an increase in the number of blood lymphocytes by 50% or more with at least 5000 B lymphocytes per microliter; transformation to a more aggressive histology; occurrence of cytopenia (neutropenia, anemia, or thrombocytopenia) attributable to CLL. Relapse: Having achieved CR or PR, but after a period of 6 or more months, having demonstrated evidence of disease progression. Participants who did not experience death or disease progression before the end of the study were censored on the day of the last available assessment. (NCT02320487)
Timeframe: Day 1 until disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 46 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine (BG)NA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response of CR or Partial Response (PR) at the End of Induction Therapy, as Determined by the Investigator Using iwCLL NCI-WG Guidelines

CR is defined in the previous outcome measure. The definition of PR required that the following be documented for minimum 2 months: >/= 50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocytes from Baseline; reduction in lymphadenopathy; >/= 50% reduction in spleen or liver enlargement; and CBC with one of the following without need for transfusion or exogenous growth factors: polymorphonuclear leukocytes >/= 1.5 times 10^9 cells/L, platelets > 100 times 10^9 cells/L or >/= 50% improvement from Baseline, or hemoglobin > 11.0 g/dL or >/= 50% improvement from Baseline. (NCT02320487)
Timeframe: 2 to 3 months after the last infusion of study treatment (up to approximately 228 to 258 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine (BG)89.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), as Determined by the Investigator Using International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia National Cancer Institute-Working Group (iwCLL NCI-WG) Guidelines

The CR rate was defined as CR or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), assessed by the investigator according to iwCLL NCI-WG criteria. The definition of confirmed CR required all of the following criteria as assessed at least 2 months after completion of therapy: peripheral blood lymphocytes < 4 times 10^9 cells/L; absence of significant lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, or splenomegaly due to CLL involvement; absence of constitutional symptoms; normal complete blood count (CBC) without need for transfusion or exogenous growth factors, as exhibited by neutrophils >/= 1.5 times 10^9 cells/L, platelets > 100 times 10^9 cells/L, and hemoglobin > 11.0 g/dL; normocellular BM aspirate with < 30% lymphocytes; absence of lymphoid nodules; and BM biopsy without CLL activity. Those fulfilling CR criteria but who have persistent anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia were considered CRi. (NCT02320487)
Timeframe: 2 to 3 months after the last infusion of study treatment (up to approximately 228 to 258 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine (BG)50.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. (NCT02320487)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to 46 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine (BG)100

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the start of induction treatment to death from any cause. Participants who did not experience death or disease progression before the end of the study were censored on the day of the last available assessment. (NCT02320487)
Timeframe: Day 1 until death from any cause (up to 46 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine (BG)NA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MRD-Negative Status in Peripheral Blood at Any Time During the Study

MRD was assessed by 4-color flow cytometry, using iwCLL criteria for MRD negativity (<1 CLL cell detected in 10,000 leukocytes) in peripheral blood. Flow cytometry provides rapid analysis of multiple characteristics of single cells by using light to count and profile cells in a fluid mixture. (NCT02320487)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 46 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine (BG)83.2

[back to top]

Number of Hospitalizations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. (NCT02320487)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to 46 months

Interventionhospitalizations (Mean)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine (BG)1.43

[back to top]

Minimum Observed Concentration (Ctrough) of Obinutuzumab After Cycle 2

Ctrough is the measured concentration of a drug at the end of a dosing interval at steady state. (NCT02320487)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion (0 hours) on Day 1 Cycle 3 (1 cycle = 28 days)

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine (BG)235.92

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Status in Bone Marrow at Any Time During the Study

MRD was assessed by 4-color flow cytometry, using iwCLL criteria for MRD negativity (<1 CLL cell detected in 10,000 leukocytes) in bone marrow aspirate. Flow cytometry provides rapid analysis of multiple characteristics of single cells by using light to count and profile cells in a fluid mixture. (NCT02320487)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine (BG)58.8

[back to top]

Duration of Response Among Participants With Objective Response of CR or PR, as Determined by the Investigator Using iwCLL NCI-WG Guidelines

Duration of response was defined as the time from the first assessment of CR, CRi, PR, or nodular partial response (nPR) to the first documentation of PD or death, whichever occurred first. CR, CRi, and PR are identified in previous outcome measures. Participants with lymphoid nodules who otherwise met CR criteria were considered nPR. Participants with post-baseline response assessments (excluding progressive disease) but with no end-of-induction treatment response available were censored on Day 1, and those with end-of-induction treatment response available but who did not experience death or disease progression before the end of the study were censored on the day of the last available assessment. (NCT02320487)
Timeframe: From the first assessment of CR, CRi, PR, or nPR (at up to approximately 228 to 258 days) until disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 46 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine (BG)NA

[back to top]

Duration of MRD-Negativity in Peripheral Blood Among Participants Who Achieved MRD-Negative Status

MRD was assessed by 4-color flow cytometry, using iwCLL criteria for MRD negativity (<1 CLL cell detected in 10,000 leukocytes) in peripheral blood. Flow cytometry provides rapid analysis of multiple characteristics of single cells by using light to count and profile cells in a fluid mixture. Duration of MRD-negativity among patients who achieved MRD negativity in the study is defined as the period between the first occurrence of MRD-negative status and a subsequent MRD-positive status. (NCT02320487)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 46 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine (BG)28.9

[back to top]

Ctrough of Obinutuzumab After Cycle 4

Ctrough is the measured concentration of a drug at the end of a dosing interval at steady state. (NCT02320487)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion (0 hours) on Day 1 Cycle 5 (1 cycle = 28 days)

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine (BG)264.27

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Score

The EORTC QLQ-C30 included global health status, functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain) and single items (dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used a 4-point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale [1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent']). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0 - 100 scale, whereby higher scores indicate greater functioning, greater quality of life, or a greater degree of symptoms, with changes of 5 - 10 points considered to be a minimally important difference to participants. A positive change from Day 1, Cycle 1 (baseline) indicates improvement. EOT=end of treatment. (NCT02320487)
Timeframe: Day 1 Cycles 1 (baseline), 3, 6; end of treatment, 2 months after last dose, every 3 months thereafter for 2 years (up to 46 months) (1 cycle = 28 days)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Status (GHS)/QoL: Cycle 3GHS/QoL: Cycle 6GHS/QoL: EOT/Early DiscontinuationGHS/QoL: Response VisitGHS/QoL: 3-Month Follow-UpGHS/QoL: 6-Month Follow-UpGHS/QoL: 9-Month Follow-UpGHS/QoL: 12-Month Follow-UpGHS/QoL: 15-Month Follow-UpGHS/QoL: 18-Month Follow-UpGHS/QoL: 21-Month Follow-UpGHS/QoL: 24-Month Follow-UpGHS/QoL: 27-Month Follow-UpGHS/QoL: 30-Month Follow-UpPhysical Function: Cycle 3Physical Function: Cycle 6Phys. Function: EOT/Early DiscontinuationPhysical Function: Response VisitPhysical Function: 3-Month Follow-UpPhysical Function: 6-Month Follow-UpPhysical Function: 9-Month Follow-UpPhysical Function: 12-Month Follow-UpPhysical Function: 15-Month Follow-UpPhysical Function: 18-Month Follow-UpPhysical Function: 21-Month Follow-UpPhysical Function: 24-Month Follow-UpPhysical Function: 27-Month Follow-UpPhysical Function: 30-Month Follow-UpRole Function: Cycle 3Role Function: Cycle 6Role Function: EOT/Early DiscontinuationRole Function: Response VisitRole Function: 3-Month Follow-UpRole Function: 6-Month Follow-UpRole Function: 9-Month Follow-UpRole Function: 12-Month Follow-UpRole Function: 15-Month Follow-UpRole Function: 18-Month Follow-UpRole Function: 21-Month Follow-UpRole Function: 24-Month Follow-UpRole Function: 27-Month Follow-UpRole Function: 30-Month Follow-UpEmotional Function: Cycle 3Emotional Function: Cycle 6Emotional Function: EOT/Early Discont.Emotional Function: Response VisitEmotional Function: 3-Month Follow-UpEmotional Function: 6-Month Follow-UpEmotional Function: 9-Month Follow-UpEmotional Function: 12-Month Follow-UpEmotional Function: 15-Month Follow-UpEmotional Function: 18-Month Follow-UpEmotional Function: 21-Month Follow-UpEmotional Function: 24-Month Follow-UpEmotional Function: 27-Month Follow-UpEmotional Function: 30-Month Follow-UpCognitive Function: Cycle 3Cognitive Function: Cycle 6Cognitive Function: EOT/Early Discont.Cognitive Function: Response VisitCognitive Function: 3-Month Follow-UpCognitive Function: 6-Month Follow-UpCognitive Function: 9-Month Follow-UpCognitive Function: 12-Month Follow-UpCognitive Function: 15-Month Follow-UpCognitive Function: 18-Month Follow-UpCognitive Function: 21-Month Follow-UpCognitive Function: 24-Month Follow-UpCognitive Function: 27-Month Follow-UpCognitive Function: 30-Month Follow-UpSocial Function: Cycle 3Social Function: Cycle 6Social Function: EOT/Early DiscontinuationSocial Function: Response VisitSocial Function: 3-Month Follow-UpSocial Function: 6-Month Follow-UpSocial Function: 9-Month Follow-UpSocial Function: 12-Month Follow-UpSocial Function: 15-Month Follow-UpSocial Function: 18-Month Follow-UpSocial Function: 21-Month Follow-UpSocial Function: 24-Month Follow-UpSocial Function: 27-Month Follow-UpSocial Function: 30-Month Follow-UpFatigue: Cycle 3Fatigue: Cycle 6Fatigue: EOT/Early DiscontinuationFatigue: Response VisitFatigue: 3-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 6-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 9-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 12-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 15-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 18-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 21-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 24-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 27-Month Follow-UpFatigue: 30-Month Follow-UpNausea/Vomiting: Cycle 3Nausea/Vomiting: Cycle 6Nausea/Vomiting: EOT/Early DiscontinuationNausea/Vomiting: Response VisitNausea/Vomiting: 3-Month Follow-UpNausea/Vomiting: 6-Month Follow-UpNausea/Vomiting: 9-Month Follow-UpNausea/Vomiting: 12-Month Follow-UpNausea/Vomiting: 15-Month Follow-UpNausea/Vomiting: 18-Month Follow-UpNausea/Vomiting: 21-Month Follow-UpNausea/Vomiting: 24-Month Follow-UpNausea/Vomiting: 27-Month Follow-UpNausea/Vomiting: 30-Month Follow-UpPain: Cycle 3Pain: Cycle 6Pain: EOT/Early DiscontinuationPain: Response VisitPain: 3-Month Follow-UpPain: 6-Month Follow-UpPain: 9-Month Follow-UpPain: 12-Month Follow-UpPain: 15-Month Follow-UpPain: 18-Month Follow-UpPain: 21-Month Follow-UpPain: 24-Month Follow-UpPain: 27-Month Follow-UpPain: 30-Month Follow-UpDyspnoea: Cycle 3Dyspnoea: Cycle 6Dyspnoea: EOT/Early DiscontinuationDyspnoea: Response VisitDyspnoea: 3-Month Follow-UpDyspnoea: 6-Month Follow-UpDyspnoea: 9-Month Follow-UpDyspnoea: 12-Month Follow-UpDyspnoea: 15-Month Follow-UpDyspnoea: 18-Month Follow-UpDyspnoea: 21-Month Follow-UpDyspnoea: 24-Month Follow-UpDyspnoea: 27-Month Follow-UpDyspnoea: 30-Month Follow-UpInsomnia: Cycle 3Insomnia: Cycle 6Insomnia: EOT/Early DiscontinuationInsomnia: Response VisitInsomnia: 3-Month Follow-UpInsomnia: 6-Month Follow-UpInsomnia: 9-Month Follow-UpInsomnia: 12-Month Follow-UpInsomnia: 15-Month Follow-UpInsomnia: 18-Month Follow-UpInsomnia: 21-Month Follow-UpInsomnia: 24-Month Follow-UpInsomnia: 27-Month Follow-UpInsomnia: 30-Month Follow-UpAppetite Loss: Cycle 3Appetite Loss: Cycle 6Appetite Loss: EOT/Early DiscontinuationAppetite Loss: Response VisitAppetite Loss: 3-Month Follow-UpAppetite Loss: 6-Month Follow-UpAppetite Loss: 9-Month Follow-UpAppetite Loss: 12-Month Follow-UpAppetite Loss: 15-Month Follow-UpAppetite Loss: 18-Month Follow-UpAppetite Loss: 21-Month Follow-UpAppetite Loss: 24-Month Follow-UpAppetite Loss: 27-Month Follow-UpAppetite Loss: 30-Month Follow-UpConstipation: Cycle 3Constipation: Cycle 6Constipation: EOT/Early DiscontinuationConstipation: Response VisitConstipation: 3-Month Follow-UpConstipation: 6-Month Follow-UpConstipation: 9-Month Follow-UpConstipation: 12-Month Follow-UpConstipation: 15-Month Follow-UpConstipation: 18-Month Follow-UpConstipation: 21-Month Follow-UpConstipation: 24-Month Follow-UpConstipation: 27-Month Follow-UpConstipation: 30-Month Follow-UpDiarrhoea: Cycle 3Diarrhoea: Cycle 6Diarrhoea: EOT/Early DiscontinuationDiarrhoea: Response VisitDiarrhoea: 3-Month Follow-UpDiarrhoea: 6-Month Follow-UpDiarrhoea: 9-Month Follow-UpDiarrhoea: 12-Month Follow-UpDiarrhoea: 15-Month Follow-UpDiarrhoea: 18-Month Follow-UpDiarrhoea: 21-Month Follow-UpDiarrhoea: 24-Month Follow-UpDiarrhoea: 27-Month Follow-UpDiarrhoea: 30-Month Follow-UpFinancial Difficulty: Cycle 3Financial Difficulty: Cycle 6Financial Difficulty: EOT/Early Discont.Financial Difficulty: Response VisitFinancial Difficulty: 3-Month Follow-UpFinancial Difficulty: 6-Month Follow-UpFinancial Difficulty: 9-Month Follow-UpFinancial Difficulty: 12-Month Follow-UpFinancial Difficulty: 15-Month Follow-UpFinancial Difficulty: 18-Month Follow-UpFinancial Difficulty: 21-Month Follow-UpFinancial Difficulty: 24-Month Follow-UpFinancial Difficulty: 27-Month Follow-UpFinancial Difficulty: 30-Month Follow-Up
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine (BG)4.025.265.1710.9810.255.689.266.436.579.847.608.9113.261.66-2.460.002.623.904.141.624.953.002.441.111.373.104.225.346.014.1110.5513.1414.8710.8615.5110.6312.6810.8810.9511.4914.97-13.337.916.299.609.128.116.9411.007.816.345.757.119.7710.158.332.55-1.750.422.742.251.776.021.482.112.553.194.021.70-3.33-2.35-4.172.535.695.41-0.258.102.743.763.702.705.467.48-10.00-4.01-5.48-11.67-16.34-15.92-13.64-17.28-13.12-11.27-13.43-13.07-14.37-14.51-2.222.333.682.32-0.39-1.58-1.26-0.23-1.040.70-0.23-1.72-2.01-1.7010.00-3.680.65-1.90-4.90-1.80-1.52-0.69-0.210.94-0.46-0.00-2.59-5.446.670.39-1.73-5.91-5.88-9.46-8.08-7.87-5.83-5.63-7.87-8.82-7.47-11.56-20.00-6.59-9.09-9.70-10.98-9.46-14.65-12.50-9.70-13.61-8.80-7.84-14.37-10.20-6.67-2.710.00-3.80-7.06-9.91-9.60-10.80-8.75-6.57-7.41-4.90-7.47-8.16-6.673.92-0.00-4.27-4.36-5.02-6.06-5.16-3.80-3.76-0.46-2.45-6.32-6.800.001.184.824.642.75-2.25-1.013.24-0.430.00-2.783.43-0.571.360.000.78-2.19-1.27-3.53-5.86-7.18-7.04-3.80-8.45-6.02-6.86-7.47-11.56-13.33

[back to top]

ORR (PR + CR) Using the Cheson et al Parameters

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR (NCT02420210)
Timeframe: Up to 8 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Bendamustine, Obinutuzumab, Dexamethasone)2

[back to top]

Renal Response After Two Cycles of Trial Treatment

(NCT02424851)
Timeframe: End of 2nd treatment cycle, week 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Partial responseMinor responseNo repsonse
Arm A (BBD)294
Arm B (BTD)076

[back to top]

Quality of Life Measured by the EQ-5D-3L Questionnaire at Baseline and 1 Month Follow up

"The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is scored on a scale of 1 to 3: 1 (no problems), 2 (some problems), and 3 (extreme problems). Higher score equates to a worse outcome.~As stated in the official EQ-5D user guide, patient responses to the 5 questions were converted into a single index value as per Dolan P (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35(11):1095-108. These index values, with country specific value sets, facilitate the calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) that are used to inform economic evaluations of health care interventions. In the UK, the values range from -0.594 to +1." (NCT02424851)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 month follow up

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline1 month FU
Arm A (BBD)0.720.69
Arm B (BTD)0.690.80

[back to top]

Haematological and Non-haematological Toxicity in Both Treatment Arms

(NCT02424851)
Timeframe: End of weeks 3, 6, 9, 12 (after receiving 4 cycles of therapy), 30 days after final treatment and 12 months after randomisation

,
InterventionEvents (Number)
Serious adverse eventsAdverse events
Arm A (BBD)23
Arm B (BTD)06

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT02424851)
Timeframe: 1 month post end of treatment and 1 year post randomisation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (BBD)9
Arm B (BTD)13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With >50% Reduction From Baseline in Serum Free Light Chain

(NCT02424851)
Timeframe: End of week 6 (after receiving two cycles of therapy)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (BBD)13
Arm B (BTD)3

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Objective response rate was defined as the number of subjects achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) after at least four cycles of ixazomib (MLN9708) and bendamustine plus dexamethasone. (NCT02477215)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
MLN9708, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone11

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

A 3+3 design was employed. At each dose, three patients were initially evaluated. If no dose limiting toxicities were observed, the bendamustine dose was increased; if one dose limiting toxicity is observed, three additional patients were treated at that dose. A dose at which 2 DLTs were observed in 3 or 6 patients were judged to be too toxic and the lower dose was defined as the maximally tolerated dose (MTD). (NCT02477215)
Timeframe: Six months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine (70 mg/m^2), MLN9708, Dexamethasone0
Bendamustine (80 mg/m^2), MLN9708, Dexamethasone1
Bendamustine (90 mg/m^2), MLN9708, Dexamethasone2

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Bendamustine

Maximum tolerated dose of bendamustine in combination with fixed doses of ixazomib (MLN9708) and dexamethasone will be determined from the incidence of dose limiting toxicities at each dosage. (NCT02477215)
Timeframe: Six months for each dosing cohort

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
MLN9708, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone80

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR)

Median time in months participants maintain CR, PR or stable disease. (NCT02477215)
Timeframe: 36 months

InterventionMONTHS (Median)
MLN9708, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone5.1

[back to top]

Cumulative Response Rates in Patients After Eight Cycles.

Percentage of subject response rates at any point during the eight cycles. (NCT02477215)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
MLN9708, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone28

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was determined as the average number of months subjects survived following enrollment. (NCT02477215)
Timeframe: 36 months

InterventionMONTHS (Median)
MLN9708, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone23.2

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

This measure is the number of months participants remain free from evidence of disease. (NCT02477215)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionMONTHS (Median)
MLN9708, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone5.2

[back to top]

Number and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)

All AEs are included in the summaries, unless treatment-emergent is specified. (NCT02594163)
Timeframe: Approximately 1 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventTreatment-Related Adverse EventBrentuximab Vedotin-Related Adverse EventRituximab-Related Adverse EventBendamustine-Related Adverse EventAdverse Event with Outcome of DeathSerious Adverse EventTreatment-Related Serious Adverse EventAdverse Event Leading to Dose DelayAdverse Event Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationGrade 3-5 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event
Brentuximab Vedotin Plus Rituximab Plus Bendamustine13131110131830511
Rituximab, Bendamustine Control11100610033314

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression/relapse, receipt of subsequent lymphoma chemotherapy other than the components of the study treatment regimen, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. (NCT02594163)
Timeframe: Up to 11.8 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rituximab, Bendamustine Control4.9
Brentuximab Vedotin Plus Rituximab Plus Bendamustine3.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time randomization to death from any cause (NCT02594163)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rituximab, Bendamustine Control14.3
Brentuximab Vedotin Plus Rituximab Plus Bendamustine6.5

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of patients who achieve a Complete Response (CR) (including Complete Metabolic Response (CMR)) or Partial Response (PR) (including Partial Metabolic Response (PMR)) as best response to combination therapy on study (NCT02594163)
Timeframe: Approximately 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab, Bendamustine Control91.7
Brentuximab Vedotin Plus Rituximab Plus Bendamustine61.5

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR is defined as the time from first observation of response to disease progression/relapse, receipt of subsequent lymphoma chemotherapy other than the components of the study treatment regimen, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. (NCT02594163)
Timeframe: Up to 10.5 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Rituximab, Bendamustine Control3.7
Brentuximab Vedotin Plus Rituximab Plus Bendamustine4.1

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate

CRR is the proportion of patients who achieve CR (including Complete Metabolic Response (CMR)) as best response to combination therapy on study. (NCT02594163)
Timeframe: Approximately 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab, Bendamustine Control8
Brentuximab Vedotin Plus Rituximab Plus Bendamustine7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at End of Induction (EOI), as Determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) Using Modified Lugano 2014 Criteria

Primary end point was positron emission tomography (PET) CR at EOI by IRC according to modified Lugano classification using PET/CT scan. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake less than or equal to [NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Atezo-G-Benda Cohort (Safety Run-In and Expansion Phases)75
Atezo-R-CHOP Cohort (Expansion Phase)77.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (CR or PR) at EOI, as Determined by the Investigator Using Modified Cheson 2007 Criteria

Objective response: having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. All positron emission tomography (PET) evaluable 1L FL and 1L DLBCL patients with at least one dose of atezolizumab were included in efficacy population. (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Atezo-G-Benda Cohort (Safety Run-In and Expansion Phases)95.0
Atezo-R-CHOP Cohort (Expansion Phase)87.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (CR or PR) at EOI, as Determined by the Investigator Using Lugano 2014 Criteria

Tumor response assessment was performed by investigator according to modified Lugano classification using PET/CT scan. OR: a response of CR or PR. CR: a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake ] liver) or 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size on PET 5-PS for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; and reduced residual uptake in bone marrow compared with baseline. All positron emission tomography (PET) evaluable 1L FL and 1L DLBCL patients with at least one dose of atezolizumab were included in efficacy population. (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Atezo-G-Benda Cohort (Safety Run-In and Expansion Phases)95.0
Atezo-R-CHOP Cohort (Expansion Phase)87.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR at EOI, as Determined by the IRC Using Modified Cheson 2007 Criteria

Complete response according to the modified Cheson 2007 criteria using PET/CT scan: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. Partial Response (PR): at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. All PET evaluable 1L FL and 1L DLBCL patients with at least one dose of atezolizumab were included in efficacy population. (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Atezo-G-Benda Cohort (Safety Run-In and Expansion Phases)75.0
Atezo-R-CHOP Cohort (Expansion Phase)77.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (CR or PR) at EOI, as Determined by the IRC Using Modified Cheson 2007 Criteria

Objective response: having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. All positron emission tomography (PET) evaluable 1L FL and 1L DLBCL patients with at least one dose of atezolizumab were included in efficacy population. (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Atezo-G-Benda Cohort (Safety Run-In and Expansion Phases)90.0
Atezo-R-CHOP Cohort (Expansion Phase)90.0

[back to top]

Observed Serum Atezolizumab Concentration

"Atezo-G-Benda: Induction:Predose on D1 of Cy5,6 & D1,15 of Cy2,3 (1Cy:21/28 days), Cy2D1:0.5h postinfusion; Maintenance:Predose on D1 of Month 1,2,4,7,15,23, Month 2 D1: 0.5h postinfusion; 120 days & 1 year of last dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years); Atezo-G-CHOP: Induction:Predose on D1 of Cy2,3,5,6 (1Cy:21 days), Cy2D1:0.5h postinfusion; Maintenance:Predose on D1 of Month 1,2,3,4,7,15,23, Month 2 D1: 0.5h postinfusion; 120 days & 1 year of last dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years). Predose time point was within 5 hour prior to dose for Cy2,3,5,6 during induction phase and for Months 1 to 24 during maintenance phase. infusion length: 30-60 minutes." (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Atezo-R-CHOP: Predose on D1 of Cy2,3,5,8,9,10,11,12,16,20,25 (1Cy:21 days), 0.5h postinfusion of D1 of Cy2,9; at 120 days & 1 year of last dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years)

,
Interventionug/mL (Median)
Cycle 2 - Cmax after 1st infusionC2 - Cmin before 2nd infusionC6 - Cmin after 6th infusion
Atezo-G-Benda Cohort (Safety Run-In and Expansion Phases)27583256
Atezo-G-CHOP Cohort (Safety Run-In Phase)42494195

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR at EOI, as Determined by the Investigator Using Modified Cheson 2007 Criteria

Complete response according to modified Cheson 2007 criteria using PET/CT scan: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. All PET evaluable 1L FL and 1L DLBCL patients with at least one dose of atezolizumab were included in efficacy population. Only Atezo-G-Benda and Atezo-R-Chop cohorts were evaluated for efficacy. (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Atezo-G-Benda Cohort (Safety Run-In and Expansion Phases)80.0
Atezo-R-CHOP Cohort (Expansion Phase)75.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR at EOI, as Determined by the Investigator Using Lugano 2014 Criteria

Tumor response assessment was performed by the investigator according to modified Lugano classification using PET/CT scan. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Atezo-G-Benda Cohort (Safety Run-In and Expansion Phases)87.5
Atezo-R-CHOP Cohort (Expansion Phase)77.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (CR or PR) at EOI, as Determined by the IRC Using Lugano 2014 Criteria

Tumor response assessment was performed by IRC according to modified Lugano classification using PET/CT scan. OR defined as a response of CR or PR. CR: a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake ] liver) or 5 (uptake markedly >liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size on PET 5-PS for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; and reduced residual uptake in bone marrow compared with baseline. All positron emission tomography (PET) evaluable 1L FL and 1L DLBCL patients with at least one dose of atezolizumab were included in efficacy population. (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Atezo-G-Benda Cohort (Safety Run-In and Expansion Phases)90.0
Atezo-R-CHOP Cohort (Expansion Phase)87.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Human Anti-Human Antibodies (HAHAs) to Obinutuzumab

Induction: Predose (any time prior to dose) on D1 of Cy1,5,6 (1Cy: 21/28 days); Maintenance: Predose (any time prior to dose) on D1 of Month 1; at 120 days and 1 year of last obinutuzumab dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years) (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 4 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Induction Cycle 1 Day 1Induction Cycle 5 Day 1Induction Cycle 6 Day 1Maintenance Month 1Study Drug Completion or Early DiscontinuationObinutuzumab Day 120 Follow up
Atezo-G-Benda Cohort (Safety Run-In and Expansion Phases)2.400000

[back to top]

Observed Serum Atezolizumab Concentration

"Atezo-G-Benda: Induction:Predose on D1 of Cy5,6 & D1,15 of Cy2,3 (1Cy:21/28 days), Cy2D1:0.5h postinfusion; Maintenance:Predose on D1 of Month 1,2,4,7,15,23, Month 2 D1: 0.5h postinfusion; 120 days & 1 year of last dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years); Atezo-G-CHOP: Induction:Predose on D1 of Cy2,3,5,6 (1Cy:21 days), Cy2D1:0.5h postinfusion; Maintenance:Predose on D1 of Month 1,2,3,4,7,15,23, Month 2 D1: 0.5h postinfusion; 120 days & 1 year of last dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years). Predose time point was within 5 hour prior to dose for Cy2,3,5,6 during induction phase and for Months 1 to 24 during maintenance phase. infusion length: 30-60 minutes." (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Atezo-R-CHOP: Predose on D1 of Cy2,3,5,8,9,10,11,12,16,20,25 (1Cy:21 days), 0.5h postinfusion of D1 of Cy2,9; at 120 days & 1 year of last dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years)

Interventionug/mL (Median)
Cycle 2 - Cmax after 1st infusionC2 - Cmin before 2nd infusionC8 - Cmax after 7th infusionC8 - Cmin before 8th infusion
Atezo-R-CHOP Cohort (Expansion Phase)33282.1486.5184

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 4 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Atezo-G-Benda Cohort (Safety Run-In and Expansion Phases)100
Atezo-G-CHOP Cohort (Safety Run-In Phase)100
Atezo-R-CHOP Cohort (Expansion Phase)100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Human Anti-Chimeric Antibodies (HACAs) to Rituximab

Induction: Predose (any time prior to dose) on D1 of Cy1,5,8 (1Cy: 21 days); Maintenance: at 120 days and 1 year of last rituximab dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years) (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 4 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
BaselineInduction Cycle 1 Day 1Induction Cycle 5 Day 1Induction Cycle 8 Day 1Rituximab Day 120 Follow upRituximab 1 Year Follow upStudy Drug Completion or Early Discontinuation
Atezo-R-CHOP Cohort (Expansion Phase)14.3000000

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to Atezolizumab

"Atezo-G-CHOP: Induction: Predose on D1 of Cy2,3,5,6 (1 Cy: 21 days); Maintenance: Predose on D1 of Month 1,2,4,7,15,23; at 120 days and 1 year of last atezolizumab dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years); Atezo-R-CHOP: Predose on D1 of Cy 2,3,5,8,16,25 (1 Cy: 21 days); at 120 days and 1 year of last atezolizumab dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years). Predose time point was any time prior to dose for Cycles 2,3,5,6,8 during induction phase, for Cycles 16,25 during consolidation treatment, and for Months 1 to 24 during maintenance phase. Atezo-G-Benda: Induction: Predose on D1 of Cy2,3,5,6 (1Cy: 28 days), Cy3D15: Predose; ; Maintenance: Predose on D1 of Month 1,4,7,15,23; at 120 days and 1 year of last atezolizumab dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years). The percentage of participants with positive results for ATAs to atezolizumab at baseline and at post-baseline time points are reported." (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 4 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
BaselineInduction Cycle 2 Day 1Consolidation Cycle 16Atezolizumab Day 120 Follow upAtezo PK and Immunogenicity Follow Up (1YR)
Atezo-R-CHOP Cohort (Expansion Phase)14.32.65.99.15.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to Atezolizumab

"Atezo-G-CHOP: Induction: Predose on D1 of Cy2,3,5,6 (1 Cy: 21 days); Maintenance: Predose on D1 of Month 1,2,4,7,15,23; at 120 days and 1 year of last atezolizumab dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years); Atezo-R-CHOP: Predose on D1 of Cy 2,3,5,8,16,25 (1 Cy: 21 days); at 120 days and 1 year of last atezolizumab dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years). Predose time point was any time prior to dose for Cycles 2,3,5,6,8 during induction phase, for Cycles 16,25 during consolidation treatment, and for Months 1 to 24 during maintenance phase. Atezo-G-Benda: Induction: Predose on D1 of Cy2,3,5,6 (1Cy: 28 days), Cy3D15: Predose; ; Maintenance: Predose on D1 of Month 1,4,7,15,23; at 120 days and 1 year of last atezolizumab dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years). The percentage of participants with positive results for ATAs to atezolizumab at baseline and at post-baseline time points are reported." (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 4 years

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
BaselineInduction Cycle 2 Day 1Atezolizumab Day 120 Follow upAtezo PK and Immunogenicity Follow Up (1YR)
Atezo-G-Benda Cohort (Safety Run-In and Expansion Phases)2.4000
Atezo-G-CHOP Cohort (Safety Run-In Phase)0000

[back to top]

Observed Serum Rituximab Concentration

"Predose time point was any time prior to dose for Cycle 1 and within 5 hour prior to dose for other cycles (Cycles 2,5,8) during induction phase and for Months 1 to 24 during maintenance phase. Infusion duration for administration of first infusion should begin at an initial rate of 50 mg/hour. If no infusion-related or hypersensitivity reaction occurs, increase the infusion rate in 50 mg/hour increments every 30 minutes to a maximum of 400 mg/hour. If no reaction occurs, increase the infusion rate in 100 mg/hour increments every 30 minutes to a maximum of 400 mg/hour." (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5h postinfusion on D1 of Cy1,2,5,8 (1Cy: 21 days); at 120 days and 1 year after last rituximab dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years)

Interventionug/mL (Median)
C1 - Cmax after dosing C1C1 - Ctrough after dosing C1C8 - Cmax after dosing C8C8 - Ctrough after dosing C8
Atezo-R-CHOP Cohort (Expansion Phase)15926.1229105.5

[back to top]

Observed Serum Obinutuzumab Concentration

"Predose time point was any time prior to dose for Cycle (Cy) 1 and within 5 hour prior to dose for other cycles (Cy 2,5,6) and for Months 1 to 24 during maintenance phase. Infusion duration for administration of first infusion should begin at an initial rate of 50 milligrams per hour (mg/hour). If no reaction occurs, increase the infusion rate in 100 mg/hour increments every 30 minutes to a maximum of 400 mg/hour." (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Induction: Predose, 0.5 hour (h) postinfusion on Day (D) 1 of Cy1,2,5,6 (1Cy: 21/28 days); Maintenance: Predose, 0.5h postinfusion on Day 1 of Month 1,3,7,15,23; 120 days & 1 year of last dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years)

,
Interventionug/mL (Median)
C1 Cmax after 1st infusionC1 Cmin after the last infusion on C1C6 - Cmax after last dosing of inductionC6 - Cmin after last dosing of induction
Atezo-G-Benda Cohort (Safety Run-In and Expansion Phases)329322544203
Atezo-G-CHOP Cohort (Safety Run-In Phase)400399659245

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Response of CR or PR During Study, as Determined by Investigator Using Modified Cheson 2007 Criteria

CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. Only Atezo-G-Benda and Atezo-R-Chop cohorts were evaluated for efficacy. (NCT02596971)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 4 years (assessed at Baseline, 6 to 8 weeks after Day [D] 1 of Cycle [Cy] 6 or 8 (1Cy: 21 or 28 days), then every 2 months up to 24 months, at 35 days of last dose, and at every 3 months post-treatment follow-up [up 4 years])

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Atezo-G-Benda Cohort (Safety Run-In and Expansion Phases)80.0
Atezo-R-CHOP Cohort (Expansion Phase)75.0

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival was calculated as the time from first dose of study drug to the first documented progression or death (from any cause) during the entire efficacy evaluation period. For participants with no progression or death, PFS was censored at the last assessment date the participant was known to be progression-free. (NCT02733042)
Timeframe: From first dose of any study drug to the end of follow-up, up to the data cutoff date of March 6, 2019; median (minimum, maximum) time on study was 16.7 (0.9, 32.9) months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg8.41
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²NA
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 10 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²NA
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 420 mgNA
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 560 mg28.71
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²9.69
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + BEN 70 mg/m²1.25
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²3.82
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 90 mg/m²2.48
Part 2, Arm B CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 420 mgNA
Part 2, Arm B MCL: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 560 mgNA
Part 2, Arm C FL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²14.65
Part 2 Arm C DLBCL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²2.06
Part 2, Arm C CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²NA
Part 2, Arm D FL: DUR 1500 mg1.68
Part 2, Arm D DLBCL: DUR 1500 mg1.17
Part 2, Arm D CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg2.76
Part 2, Arm D MCL: DUR 1500 mg2.33
Part 2, Arm D HL: DUR 1500 mg2.66

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Durvalumab

(NCT02733042)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 (pre-dose and at end of infusion), and 4, 24, 48, 168 (Day 8), 336 (Day 15), and 508 (Day 22) hours after the end of infusion.

Interventionμg/L (Geometric Mean)
Arm A: Durvalumab + Lenalidomide ± Rituximab420264.066
Arm B: Durvalumab + Ibrutinib361906.229
Arm C: Durvalumab + Bendamustine ± Rituximab331572.478
Arm D: Durvalumab Monotherapy392663.668

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) During Durvalumab Treatment

For lymphoma participants, response evaluation was based on International Working Group (IWG) response criteria for malignant lymphoma (the Lugano Classification). Overall response rate is defined as the percent of participants with best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). For chronic lymphocytic leukemia participants, response evaluation was based on International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of CLL. The ORR is defined as the percent of participants with best response of CR, complete response with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), nodular partial response (nPR), PR, or partial response with lymphocytosis (PRL). (NCT02733042)
Timeframe: Up to 13 cycles (12 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg33.3
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²66.7
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 10 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²80.0
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 420 mg66.7
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 560 mg75.0
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²33.3
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²50.0
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 90 mg/m²0
Part 2, Arm B CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 420 mg88.9
Part 2, Arm B MCL: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 560 mg60.0
Part 2, Arm C FL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²88.9
Part 2 Arm C DLBCL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²30.0
Part 2, Arm C CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²50.0
Part 2, Arm D FL: DUR 1500 mg0
Part 2, Arm D DLBCL: DUR 1500 mg0
Part 2, Arm D CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg0
Part 2, Arm D MCL: DUR 1500 mg0
Part 2, Arm D HL: DUR 1500 mg20.0

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate During the Entire Study

For lymphoma participants, response evaluation was based on International Working Group (IWG) response criteria for malignant lymphoma (the Lugano Classification) (Cheson, 2014). Overall response rate is defined as the percent of participants with best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). For chronic lymphocytic leukemia participants, response evaluation was based on International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of CLL. The ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with best response of CR, complete response with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), nodular partial response (nPR), PR, or partial response with lymphocytosis (PRL). (NCT02733042)
Timeframe: From first dose of any study drug to the end of follow-up, up to the data cutoff date of March 6, 2019; median (minimum, maximum) time on study was 16.7 (0.9, 32.9) months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg66.7
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²66.7
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 10 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²80.0
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 420 mg66.7
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 560 mg75.0
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²33.3
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²50.0
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 90 mg/m²0
Part 2, Arm B CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 420 mg100.0
Part 2, Arm B MCL: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 560 mg70.0
Part 2, Arm C FL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²88.9
Part 2 Arm C DLBCL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²30.0
Part 2, Arm C CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²50.0
Part 2, Arm D FL: DUR 1500 mg0
Part 2, Arm D DLBCL: DUR 1500 mg0
Part 2, Arm D CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg0
Part 2, Arm D MCL: DUR 1500 mg0
Part 2, Arm D HL: DUR 1500 mg20.0

[back to top]

Part 1: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

Dose limiting toxicities were evaluated during the DLT evaluation period for participants in the dose finding cohorts. The severity grading was determined according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.03. A DLT is defined as below: Hematologic DLT • Grade 4 neutropenia observed for greater than 5 days duration • Grade 3 neutropenia associated with fever (≥ 38.5 °C) of any duration • Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, or any requirement for platelets transfusion • Grade 4 anemia, unexplained by underlying disease • Any other grade 4 hematologic toxicity that does not resolve to participant's pretreatment baseline level within 72 hours. Non-Hematologic DLT • Any non-hematological toxicity ≥ Grade 3 except for alopecia and nausea controlled by medical management • Any treatment interruption greater than 2 weeks due to adverse event. (NCT02733042)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (28 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg0
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²3
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 10 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²1
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 420 mg0
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 560 mg0
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²0
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²0
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 90 mg/m²1

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Phase Half-Life (t½) of Durvalumab

(NCT02733042)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 (pre-dose and at end of infusion), and 4, 24, 48, 168 (Day 8), 336 (Day 15), and 508 (Day 22) hours after the end of infusion.

Interventiondays (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Arm A: Durvalumab + Lenalidomide ± Rituximab11.596
Arm B: Durvalumab + Ibrutinib17.344
Arm C: Durvalumab + Bendamustine ± Rituximab16.327
Arm D: Durvalumab Monotherapy15.399

[back to top]

Time to First Response

Time to response was calculated as the time from first dose of study drug to the first response date (CR or PR for lymphoma participants and CR, CRi, nPR, PR, or PRL for CLL participants). (NCT02733042)
Timeframe: From first dose of any study drug to the end of follow-up, up to the data cutoff date of March 6, 2019; median (minimum, maximum) time on study was 16.7 (0.9, 32.9) months.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg70.85
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²12.60
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 10 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²18.20
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 420 mg11.85
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 560 mg13.40
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²13.00
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²13.10
Part 2, Arm B CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 420 mg12.10
Part 2, Arm B MCL: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 560 mg12.10
Part 2, Arm C FL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²12.35
Part 2 Arm C DLBCL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²12.00
Part 2, Arm C CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²12.10
Part 2, Arm D HL: DUR 1500 mg13.10

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Durvalumab

(NCT02733042)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 (pre-dose and at end of infusion), and 4, 24, 48, 168 (Day 8), 336 (Day 15), and 508 (Day 22) hours after the end of infusion.

Interventiondays (Median)
Arm A: Durvalumab + Lenalidomide ± Rituximab0.0510
Arm B: Durvalumab + Ibrutinib0.0479
Arm C: Durvalumab + Bendamustine ± Rituximab0.0510
Arm D: Durvalumab Monotherapy0.0420

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution (Vz) of Durvalumab

(NCT02733042)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 (pre-dose and at end of infusion), and 4, 24, 48, 168 (Day 8), 336 (Day 15), and 508 (Day 22) hours after the end of infusion.

Interventionliters (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Arm A: Durvalumab + Lenalidomide ± Rituximab5.155
Arm B: Durvalumab + Ibrutinib6.451
Arm C: Durvalumab + Bendamustine ± Rituximab7.418
Arm D: Durvalumab Monotherapy5.957

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lenalidomide

(NCT02733042)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 at predose and 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours post-dose, and Cycle 1 Day 15 at pre-dose, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose.

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Arm A: Lenalidomide 10 mg141.881107.635
Arm A: Lenalidomide 20 mg309.917174.090

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as adverse events (AEs) occurring or worsening on or after the first dose of any study treatment (durvalumab, lenalidomide, ibrutinib, bendamustine or rituximab) and within 90 days after last dose of durvalumab or 28 days after the last dose of other study drugs, whichever was later, as well as those serious adverse events made known to the investigator at any time thereafter that were suspected of being related to study treatment. The intensity of AEs was graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. For all other AEs not described in the CTCAE criteria, the intensity was assessed by the investigator as mild (Grade 1), moderate (Grade 2), severe (Grade 3), life-threatening (Grade 4), or death (Grade 5). (NCT02733042)
Timeframe: From first dose of any study drug to 90 days after last dose of durvalumab or 28 days after last dose of other study drugs, up to the data cut-off date of 6 March 2019. Maximum time on treatment was 55.4 weeks for DUR and 130 weeks for other study drugs.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAETEAE Related to Any Study DrugCTCAE Grade 3-4 TEAECTCAE Grade 3-4 TEAE Related to Any Study DrugCTCAE Grade 5 TEAECTCAE Grade 5 TEAE Related to Any Study DrugSerious TEAESerious TEAE Related to Any Study DrugTEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Any Study DrugTEAE Leading to Dose Modifications of Study Drug
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 10 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²8877004333
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg3311001111
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²3333002203
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 420 mg3321002113
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 560 mg4431002004
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + BEN 70 mg/m²1010001001
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²3322002103
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²4432001004
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 90 mg/m²5542003104
Part 2 Arm C DLBCL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²9997005314
Part 2, Arm B CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 420 mg101087006208
Part 2, Arm B MCL: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 560 mg109106117329
Part 2, Arm C CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²5553102123
Part 2, Arm C FL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²101065005327
Part 2, Arm D CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg2010000000
Part 2, Arm D DLBCL: DUR 1500 mg9372407100
Part 2, Arm D FL: DUR 1500 mg5443104312
Part 2, Arm D HL: DUR 1500 mg5231002003
Part 2, Arm D MCL: DUR 1500 mg5341003013

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) - Extended Collection

TEAEs defined as AEs occurring or worsening on or after first dose of any study treatment (durvalumab, lenalidomide, ibrutinib, bendamustine or rituximab) and within 90 days after last dose of durvalumab or 28 days after the last dose of other study drugs, whichever was later, as well as those serious adverse events made known to the investigator at any time thereafter that were suspected of being related to study treatment. Intensity of AEs graded according to the NCI CTCAE V. 4.03. For all other AEs not described in the CTCAE criteria, the intensity was assessed by investigator as mild (Grade 1), moderate (Grade 2), severe (Grade 3), life-threatening (Grade 4), or death (Grade 5). This outcome measure represents an updated version of the primary endpoint to include additional data collection that has occurred after the primary completion date (assessments made until August 21, 2022). (NCT02733042)
Timeframe: From first dose of any study drug to 90 days after last dose of durvalumab or 28 days after last dose of other study drugs, up to the study completion date of August 21, 2022 (up to approximately 75 months).

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAETEAE Related to Any Study DrugCTCAE Grade 3-4 TEAECTCAE Grade 3-4 TEAE Related to Any Study DrugCTCAE Grade 5 TEAECTCAE Grade 5 TEAE Related to Any Study DrugSerious TEAESerious TEAE Related to Any Study DrugTEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Any Study DrugTEAE Leading to Dose Modifications of Study Drug
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 10 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²8877004335
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg3311001111
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²3333002203
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 420 mg3321002113
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 560 mg4441003004
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + BEN 70 mg/m²1010001001
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²3322002103
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²4432001004
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 90 mg/m²5542003104
Part 2 Arm C DLBCL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²9997005314
Part 2, Arm B CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 420 mg101098006309
Part 2, Arm B MCL: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 560 mg109106117329
Part 2, Arm C CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²5553102123
Part 2, Arm C FL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²101065005327
Part 2, Arm D CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg2010000000
Part 2, Arm D DLBCL: DUR 1500 mg9372407100
Part 2, Arm D FL: DUR 1500 mg5443104312
Part 2, Arm D HL: DUR 1500 mg5231002003
Part 2, Arm D MCL: DUR 1500 mg5341003013

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Ibrutinib

(NCT02733042)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 at predose and 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours post-dose, and Cycle 1 Day 15 at pre-dose, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose.

,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Arm B: Ibrutinib 420 mg2.0001.8833
Arm B: Ibrutinib 560 mg1.93332.000

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Lenalidomide

(NCT02733042)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 at predose and 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours post-dose, and Cycle 1 Day 15 at pre-dose, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose.

,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Arm A: Lenalidomide 10 mg1.95003.0333
Arm A: Lenalidomide 20 mg1.16671.000

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) of Durvalumab

(NCT02733042)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 (pre-dose and at end of infusion), and 4, 24, 48, 168 (Day 8), 336 (Day 15), and 508 (Day 22) hours after the end of infusion.

Interventiondays*μg/L (Geometric Mean)
Arm A: Durvalumab + Lenalidomide ± Rituximab4867431.378
Arm B: Durvalumab + Ibrutinib5818262.846
Arm C: Durvalumab + Bendamustine ± Rituximab4762968.345
Arm D: Durvalumab Monotherapy5593532.553

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Durvalumab

(NCT02733042)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 (pre-dose and at end of infusion), and 4, 24, 48, 168 (Day 8), 336 (Day 15), and 508 (Day 22) hours after the end of infusion.

Interventiondays*μg/L (Geometric Mean)
Arm A: Durvalumab + Lenalidomide ± Rituximab3120149.759
Arm B: Durvalumab + Ibrutinib3225869.344
Arm C: Durvalumab + Bendamustine ± Rituximab2670168.397
Arm D: Durvalumab Monotherapy3053060.746

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Ibrutinib

(NCT02733042)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 at predose and 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Arm B: Ibrutinib 420 mg586.396
Arm B: Ibrutinib 560 mg436.855

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Ibrutinib

(NCT02733042)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 at predose and 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours post-dose, and Cycle 1 Day 15 at pre-dose, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose.

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Arm B: Ibrutinib 420 mg129.70486.840
Arm B: Ibrutinib 560 mg67.72872.436

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Lenalidomide

(NCT02733042)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 at predose and 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Arm A: Lenalidomide 10 mg789.297
Arm A: Lenalidomide 20 mg805.299

[back to top]

Clearance (CL) of Durvalumab

(NCT02733042)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 (pre-dose and at end of infusion), and 4, 24, 48, 168 (Day 8), 336 (Day 15), and 508 (Day 22) hours after the end of infusion.

InterventionL/day (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Arm A: Durvalumab + Lenalidomide ± Rituximab0.3082
Arm B: Durvalumab + Ibrutinib0.2578
Arm C: Durvalumab + Bendamustine ± Rituximab0.3149
Arm D: Durvalumab Monotherapy0.2682

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined for responders only as the time from the first documented response (CR or PR for lymphoma participants or CR, CRi, nPR, PR, or PRL for CLL participants) to disease progression or death (from any cause). For participants with response but no progression, or death, duration of response was censored at the last date that the participant was known to be progression-free. (NCT02733042)
Timeframe: From first dose of any study drug to the end of follow-up, up to the data cutoff date of March 6, 2019; median (minimum, maximum) time on study was 16.7 (0.9, 32.9) months.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg10.14
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 20 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²NA
Part 1, Arm A: DUR 1500 mg + LEN 10 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²NA
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 420 mgNA
Part 1, Arm B: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 560 mgNA
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m²29.29
Part 1, Arm C: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²NA
Part 2, Arm B CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 420 mgNA
Part 2, Arm B MCL: DUR 1500 mg + IBR 560 mgNA
Part 2, Arm C FL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²NA
Part 2 Arm C DLBCL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²24.14
Part 2, Arm C CLL/SLL: DUR 1500 mg + RIT 375 mg/m² + BEN 70 mg/m²NA
Part 2, Arm D HL: DUR 1500 mg11.14

[back to top]

3-years Overall Survival Rate

Percentage of patients alive after 3 years from study entry (NCT02853370)
Timeframe: 3 years after treatment start

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Bendamustine and Rituximab96

[back to top]

3-year Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"Percentage of patients free from disease progression after 3 years from study entry.~Progression is defined as reappearance of cytopenia or lymphoma relapse/ progression with enlarged lymph node(s) or spleen if present, histologic transformation or death as a result of any cause." (NCT02853370)
Timeframe: 3 years after study entry

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Bendamustine and Rituximab90

[back to top]

3-years Duration of Response (DOR)

Percentage of responding patients after 3 years from study entry. DOR is defined for all patients who achieved a response (CR and PR) (NCT02853370)
Timeframe: 3 years from study entry

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Bendamustine and Rituximab93

[back to top]

3-years Event Free Survival (EFS)

Percentage of patients free from events after 3 years from study entry. Events are defined as any treatment failure including disease progression, or discontinuation of treatment for any cause (eg, disease progression, toxicity, patient preference, initiation of new treatment without documented progression, or death). (NCT02853370)
Timeframe: 3 years after study entry

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Bendamustine and Rituximab80

[back to top]

5 Years Overall Survival (OS)

Percentage of patients alive after 5 years from study entry (NCT02853370)
Timeframe: Five years after study entry

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Bendamustine and Rituximab93

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate (CRR)

"Percentage of patients with complete response. Complete response to be assessed by means of CT-scan, Immunophenotype in blood and bone marrow (PET-scan optional) Complete response (CR) requires the disappearance of all evidence of disease~Regression to normal size on CT of organomegaly (splenomegaly, hepatomegaly and lymphoadenopathies)~Normalization of the blood counts (Hb >12 g/dl; platelets >100.000/mm3; neutrophils >1.500/mm3 and no evidence of circulating clonal B-cells)~No evidence or minor (<5%) BM infiltration detected by immunohistochemistry" (NCT02853370)
Timeframe: At the end of treatment (After 24 weeks of treatment)

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Bendamustine and Rituximab73

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"Percentage of patients with complete and partial response. Partial response (PR) requires regression of 50% or greater in the measurable disease manifestations and no new sites of disease.~This should include: resolution or decrease in spleen size, improvement on cytopenias and resolution or decrease in lymphadenopathy if present. Bone Marrow should show a decrease in the level of lymphoid infiltration and improvement of the haemopoietic reserve" (NCT02853370)
Timeframe: At the end of treatment (After 24 weeks of treatment)

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Bendamustine and Rituximab91

[back to top]

5 Years Progression Free Survival (PFS) -

Percentage of patients free from disease progression after 5 years from treatment start. Progression is defined as reappearance of cytopenia or lymphoma relapse/ progression with enlarged lymph node(s) or spleen if present, histologic transformation or death as a result of any cause. (NCT02853370)
Timeframe: Five years after study entry

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Bendamustine and Rituximab83

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3, As Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03

AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03,severity was graded as Grade 1:asymptomatic/mild symptoms,clinical/diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2:moderate, minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated,limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3:severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4:life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5:death related to AE. TEAE was defined as events which occurred during on-treatment period beginning with first dose of study treatment through minimum (30 days + last dose of study treatment or start of new anti-cancer drug therapy). In this outcome measure participant with any TEAE of Grade 3 or above are reported. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab4
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab7
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab10

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status

Number of participants with MRD positive, negative and not evaluable status were reported in this outcome measure. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline: PositiveBaseline: NegativeBaseline: NECycle 3 Day 1: PositiveCycle 3 Day 1: NegativeCycle 3 Day 1: NECycle 6 Day 1: PositiveCycle 6 Day 1: NegativeCycle 6 Day 1: NECycle 9 Day 1: PositiveCycle 9 Day 1: NegativeCycle 9 Day 1: NECycle 12 Day 1: PositiveCycle 12 Day 1: NegativeCycle 12 Day 1: NECycle 18 Day 1: PositiveCycle 18 Day 1: NegativeCycle 18 Day 1: NE
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab108101100000000000
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab326131022012012001
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab305302000000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

ECG abnormalities included: 1) QT interval, QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula (QTcB) and QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF): increase from baseline greater than (>) 30 millisecond (ms) or 60 ms; absolute value >450 ms, >480 ms and >500 ms; 2) heart rate (HR): absolute value <=50 beats per minute (bpm) and decrease from baseline >=20 bpm; absolute value >=120 bpm and increase from baseline >=20 bpm; 3) PR interval: absolute value >=220 ms and increase from baseline >=20 ms; 4) QRS interval: absolute value >=120 ms. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
QT: Increase from baseline >30 msQT: Increase from baseline >60 msQT: >450 msQT: >480 msQT: >500 msQTcB: Increase from baseline >30 msQTcB: Increase from baseline >60 msQTcB: >450 msQTcB: >480 msQTcB: >500 msQTcF: Increase from baseline >30 msQTcF: Increase from baseline >60 msQTcF: >450 msQTcF: >480 msQTcF: >500 msHeart rate: <=50 bpm and decrease from baseline >=20 bpmHeart rate: >=120 bpm and increase from baseline >=20 bpmPR: >=220 ms and increase from baseline >=20 msQRS: >=120 ms
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab4321031532323221001
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab4221040941306000102
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab4120011421104000001

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at date of last contact. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to discontinuation from the study or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab14.8
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab4.0
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab5.2

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

Investigator assessed PFS was defined as time (in months) from date of randomization to the first documentation of disease progression or death (due to any cause), whichever occurred first. PFS data was censored on the date of the last adequate tumor assessment for participants who had no an event (PD or death), for participants who start a new anti-cancer therapy prior to an event or for participants with an event after 2 or more missing or inadequate post-baseline tumor assessment. Participants without an adequate baseline or post-baseline tumor assessment were censored on the date of randomization unless death occurred on or before the time of the second planned tumor assessment in which case the death was considered as an event. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to progression of disease, study discontinuation, censoring date or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 36 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab1.8
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab1.5
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab2.7

[back to top]

Time to Tumor Response (TTR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

TTR was defined for participants who achieved objective response as time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake <= mediastinum), or 3 (uptake =50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a >=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) (maximum up to 36 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab1.8
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab1.9

[back to top]

Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab

(NCT02951156)
Timeframe: 1 hour Post dose Day 2 Cycle 1, 144 hour Post dose Day 8 of Cycle 1, 0 hour Post dose Day 16 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 4 and Cycle 6

Interventionmicrogram per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2Cycle 1 Day 8Cycle 1 Day 16Cycle 4 Day 1
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab183.2975.1425.3325.00

[back to top]

Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab

(NCT02951156)
Timeframe: 1 hour Post dose Day 2 Cycle 1, 144 hour Post dose Day 8 of Cycle 1, 0 hour Post dose Day 16 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 4 and Cycle 6

,
Interventionmicrogram per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2Cycle 1 Day 8Cycle 1 Day 16Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 6 Day 1
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab198.4368.4426.5362.007.57
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab193.3065.3319.36120.8839.43

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status

ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: Baseline: 2 hours pre-dose of first dose of avelumab, Post baseline: post first dose up to up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline: ADA ever-positiveBaseline: ADA never-positivePost Baseline: ADA ever-positivePost Baseline: ADA never-positive
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab0909
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab110011
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab0808

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status

ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADA ever-positiveADA never-positive
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab011
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab08

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

ORR was defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as assessed by investigator per lugano response classification criteria. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake less than or equal to [<=] mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than [<] mediastinum but <=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-point scale (5-PS), for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow. PR was defined as >=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a >=50% decrease in sum of products of diameters (SPD) of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: Randomization until date of PD, start of new anticancer therapy, discontinuation from study or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab11.1
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab0
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab27.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status

ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADA ever-positiveADA never-positive
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab27
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab17

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)

AEs occurring in first 4 weeks of treatment,attributable to 1 of study drugs. Hematology:1)Grade 4 neutropenia,2)Grade >=3 febrile neutropenia with single temperature of >38.3 degrees Celsius (C)/sustained temperature of >=38.0 degrees C for more than 1 hour with/without associated sepsis,3)Grade >=3 neutropenic infection,4)Grade 4 thrombocytopenia/Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding,5)Grade 4 anemia 6)Any grade >=3 non-hematology toxicity except:transient Grade 3 flu like symptoms/fever controlled with standard medical management;transient Grade 3 fatigue,localized skin reactions/headache that resolves to Grade <=1;Grade 3 nausea,vomiting/diarrhea resolved to Grade <=1 in ˂72 hours after initiation of adequate medical management;Grade 3 skin toxicity resolved to Grade <=1 in ˂7 days;tumor flare;Single laboratory values that are out of normal range,that have no clinical correlate and resolve to Grade <=1 within 7 days with adequate medical management. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: Day 1 Cycle 1 up to 4 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab1
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab0
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab0

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

Investigator assessed DOR: was defined for participants with OR as time from first documentation of OR to time of first documentation of disease progression/death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: score of 1(no uptake above background),2(uptake <=mediastinum),or 3(uptake =50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 of largest dominant lymph nodes,no increase in size of other nodes,liver,spleen volume,>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic splenic nodules,absence of other organ involvement,no new sites of disease. PD: appearance of new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis,at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD/longest diameter of previous lesion/node. Data was censored on date of last adequate tumor assessment in participants with no event,started new anti-cancer therapy/had 2 or more missing assessments. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: First response (CR or PR) to date of PD, start of new anti-cancer therapy, discontinuation from the study, censoring date or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab1.81
Avelumab+Bendamustine+RituximabNA

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

Disease control rate was defined as percentage of participants with disease control. Disease Control (DC) was defined as the best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD). CR: score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake <= mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than =50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a >=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease. SD: <50% decrease in SDP of up to 6 dominant, measurable nodes and extranodal sites; no criteria for progressive disease met. To qualify as a best overall response of SD, at least one SD assessment must be observed >=6 weeks after start date and before disease progression. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the first documentation of PD, study discontinuation, start of new anti-cancer therapy or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab22.2
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab0
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab36.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03

Laboratory parameters included hematological and biochemistry: Hematological parameters included: anemia, haemoglobin increased, lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased and white blood cells decreased. Biochemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood bilirubin increased, cholesterol high, creatine kinase(cpk) increased, creatinine increased, gamma glutamyl transferase(ggt) increased, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia, lipase increased,serum amylase increased.Test abnormalities were graded by NCI CTCAE version 4.03 as Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; Grade 3/Grade 4=severe/life-threatening. Number of participants with abnormalities of any grade were reported. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AnemiaHemoglobin increasedLymphocyte count decreasedLymphocyte count increasedNeutrophil count decreasedPlatelet count decreasedWhite blood cell decreasedAlanine aminotransferase increasedAlkaline phosphatase increasedAspartate aminotransferase increasedBlood bilirubin increasedCholesterol highCpk increasedCreatinine increasedGGT increasedHypercalcemiaHyperglycemiaHyperkalemiaHypermagnesemiaHypernatremiaHypertriglyceridemiaHypoalbuminemiaHypocalcemiaHypoglycemiaHypokalemiaHypomagnesemiaHyponatremiaHypophosphatemiaLipase increasedSerum amylase increased
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab807023454633164310103400101021
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab10090988263332106222117621443533
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab604024123302263030103310100112

[back to top]

Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline

Percentage of Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry at Baseline. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: Screening (prior to first dose of study treatment)

,,
InterventionPercentage of cells staining positive (Median)
Tumor Cells (membrane)Immune Cells
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab0.57.5
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab017.5
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab07.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status

nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
nAb ever-positivenAb never-positive
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab02
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab01

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for TAK-659

(NCT02954406)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15: Pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose in Cycle 1 (Cohorts A, B and C - each cycle was of 21 days and Cohorts D and E - each cycle was of 28 days)

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionnanograms(ng)/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 100 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2118.10187.73
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 60 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^283.61126.49
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 80 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^289.74145.03
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 100 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2180.10223.53
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 60 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2128.58158.28
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 80 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2142.84222.96
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort C: TAK-659 60 mg + Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2141.27303.34
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort D: TAK-659 40 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg139.00188.00
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort D: TAK-659 60 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg65.03202.90
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort E: TAK-659 60 mg + Ibrutinib 560 mg120.23306.59

[back to top]

AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve During Dosing Interval

(NCT02954406)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15: Pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose in Cycle 1 (Cohorts A, B and C - each cycle was of 21 days and Cohorts D and E - each cycle was of 28 days)

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionh×ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 100 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^21532.343050.97
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 60 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^21094.511845.21
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 80 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^21011.491675.91
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 100 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^21444.892662.16
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 60 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2852.361896.76
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 80 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^21455.922788.61
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort C: TAK-659 60 mg + Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2387.543251.29
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort D: TAK-659 40 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg1456.032536.48
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort D: TAK-659 60 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg758.762578.30
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort E: TAK-659 60 mg + Ibrutinib 560 mg968.824218.90

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time from the date of first drug administration to the date of first documented PD. PD was defined as any new lesion or increase by >50% of previously involved sites from nadir. (NCT02954406)
Timeframe: Up to 123 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 60 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^24.2
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 80 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^22.7
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 100 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^29.6
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 60 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^22.6
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 80 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^24.2
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 100 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^21.3
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort C: TAK-659 60 mg + Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^21.4
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort D: TAK-659 40 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg3.4
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort D: TAK-659 60 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mgNA
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort E: TAK-659 60 mg + Ibrutinib 560 mg2.7

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as the time from the date of first documented response to the date of first documented PD. PD was defined as any new lesion or increase by > 50% of previously involved sites from nadir. (NCT02954406)
Timeframe: Up to 123 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 60 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^22.3
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 80 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^22.8
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 100 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2NA
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 60 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2NA
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 80 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^23.9
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort D: TAK-659 40 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg1.8
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort D: TAK-659 60 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mgNA
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort E: TAK-659 60 mg + Ibrutinib 560 mgNA

[back to top] [back to top]

Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration for TAK-659

(NCT02954406)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15: Pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose in Cycle 1 (Cohorts A, B and C - each cycle was of 21 days and Cohorts D and E - each cycle was of 28 days)

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionhours (h) (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 100 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^24.003.83
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 60 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^24.004.00
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 80 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^22.031.09
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 100 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^22.002.47
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 60 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^21.101.17
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 80 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^22.001.93
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort C: TAK-659 60 mg + Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^24.132.76
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort D: TAK-659 40 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg0.61.9
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort D: TAK-659 60 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg2.122.08
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort E: TAK-659 60 mg + Ibrutinib 560 mg1.001.01

[back to top]

Dose Escalation Phase: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of TAK-659

MTD was defined as the maximum dose that is determined to be safe and tolerable in different cohorts. Each cohort (A, B, C, D and E) received different escalating doses of TAK-659 in combination with other drugs. For each cohort the maximum tolerated dose of TAK-659 in combination with the other drug/s from the selected dose range is reported. (NCT02954406)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (Cohorts A, B and C - each cycle was of 21 days and Cohorts D and E - each cycle was of 28 days)

Interventionmg (Number)
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 60-100 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2NA
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 60-100 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2NA
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort C: TAK-659 60 mg + Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2NA
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort D: TAK-659 40-60 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mgNA
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort E: TAK-659 60 mg + Ibrutinib 560 mgNA

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in the response-evaluable population who achieved either complete response (CR), or partial response (PR). CR was defined as the disappearance of all evidence of disease, and PR was defined as regression of measurable disease and no new sites. (NCT02954406)
Timeframe: Up to 123 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 60 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^233.3
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 80 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^275.0
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort A: TAK-659 100 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^250.0
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 60 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^240.0
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 80 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^280.0
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort B: TAK-659 100 mg + Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 + Rituximab 375 mg/m^20.0
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort C: TAK-659 60 mg + Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^20.0
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort D: TAK-659 40 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg100.0
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort D: TAK-659 60 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg33.3
Dose Escalation Phase Cohort E: TAK-659 60 mg + Ibrutinib 560 mg50.0

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) Per Investigator Assessment Based on 03 September 2021 Data Cutoff

Duration of Response (DOR) is defined as from the first documentation of CR, CRi, PR, or nPR to the earlier of the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause. (NCT02970318)
Timeframe: Investigator assessments were done from randomization date until date of death or study discontinuation or data cutoff date on 03Sep2021, whichever came first up to 53 months of follow-up.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A: Acalabrutinib MonotherapyNA
Arm B: Investigator's Choice18.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment Based on 15 January 2019 Data Cutoff From Interim Analysis.

Duration of Response (DOR) is defined as from the first documentation of CR, CRi, PR, or nPR to the earlier of the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause. (NCT02970318)
Timeframe: IRC assessments from randomization date until disease progression or death or IRC discontinuation on 15Jan2019 (as IA per this data cutoff showed crossing superiority boundary) whichever came first, up to 22 months of follow-up

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A: Acalabrutinib MonotherapyNA
Arm B: Investigator's Choice13.6

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Investigator Assessment

PFS per investigator assessment based on the final analysis data cutoff date of 03 September 2021. (NCT02970318)
Timeframe: From randomization date to date of disease progression or death due to any cause or data cutoff date on 03Sep2021, whichever came first, regardless of use of subsequent anticancer therapy, until 53 months of follow-up.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A: Acalabrutinib MonotherapyNA
Arm B: Investigator's Choice16.8

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment

"To evaluate the efficacy of acalabrutinib monotherapy (Arm A) compared with idelalisib/rituximab or bendamustine/rituximab (Arm B) based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessment of progression-free survival (PFS) per International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2008 criteria (Hallek 2008) with incorporation of the clarification for treatment-related lymphocytosis (Cheson 2012) hereafter referred to as IWCLL 2008 criteria in subjects with relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). As planned and reported in the interim clinical study report (dated 17 July 2019), because the study did cross the boundary at interim analysis.~IRC assessments were discontinued after the interim analysis. All IRC-related efficacy analyses in this clinical study report were based on the interim analysis data cutoff date of 15 January 2019. All other efficacy analyses were based on the final analysis data cutoff date of 03 September 2021." (NCT02970318)
Timeframe: IRC assessments from randomization date until disease progression or death or IRC discontinuation on 15Jan2019 (as IA per this data cutoff showed crossing superiority boundary) whichever came first, up to 22 months of follow-up

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A: Acalabrutinib MonotherapyNA
Arm B: Investigators Choice16.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival (OS) was based on data cutoff date of 03Sep2021 (NCT02970318)
Timeframe: From randomization date to date of death due to any cause, or date of study discontinuation, or date of data cutoff on 03Sep2021, whichever came first until 54 months of follow-up.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A: Acalabrutinib MonotherapyNA
Arm B: Investigator's ChoiceNA

[back to top]

IRC-assessed Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per IWCLL 2008 Criteria Based on Data Cutoff 15 January 2019 From Interim Analysis

IRC-assessed overall response rate (ORR) including complete response (CR), CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) nodular PR (nPR), and Partial Response (PR) (NCT02970318)
Timeframe: IRC assessments from randomization date until disease progression or death or IRC discontinuation on 15Jan2019 (as IA per this data cutoff showed crossing superiority boundary) whichever came first, up to 22 months of follow-up

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: Acalabrutinib Monotherapy126
Arm B: Investigator's Choice117

[back to top]

Investigator Assessed Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per IWCLL 2008 Criteria Based on Data Cutoff 03 September 2021

IRC-assessed overall response rate (ORR) including complete response (CR), CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) nodular PR (nPR), and Partial Response (PR) (NCT02970318)
Timeframe: Investigator assessments were done from randomization date until date of death or date of exit from study or data cut off date on 03Sep2021, whichever came first, up to 53 months of follow-up.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: Acalabrutinib Monotherapy128
Arm B: Investigator's Choice130

[back to top]

Cohort 1: Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Determined by Independent Central Review (ICR)

PFS is defined as the time from randomization until first documentation of progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, as assessed by the ICR per 2008 International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) guidelines with modifications for treatment-related lymphocytosis in participants with CLL and the Revised Criteria for Response for Malignant Lymphoma in participants with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). (NCT03336333)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 3 years and 7 months (as of cut-off date of 07MAY2021)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cohort 1: Bendamustine + Rituximab Without Del(17p)33.7
Cohort 1: Zanubrutinib Without Del(17p)NA

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of any study drug (either venetoclax, obinutuzumab, or bendamustine) to date of disease progression. All disease progression was to be included regardless of whether the event occurred during or after the participant was taking any study drug.The distribution of the time to progression was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. (NCT03406156)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until the last participant completed Week 65 assessments (data cut-off date of 13 October 2021); overall median time on follow-up was up to 787 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
ObinutuzumabNA
Obinutuzumab/BendamustineNA

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR)

DoR is defined as the number of days from the date of first response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR per the 2008 Modified IWCLL NCI-WG criteria) to the date of disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. All disease progression was to be included regardless whether the event occurred during or after the participant was taking any study drug (either venetoclax, obinutuzumab, or bendamustine). Duration of response was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) methodology. (NCT03406156)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until the last participant completed Week 65 assessments (data cut-off date of 13 October 2021); overall median time on follow-up was up to 787 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Obinutuzumab21.7
Obinutuzumab/BendamustineNA

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best response of complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), nodular partial remission (nPR), or partial remission (PR) based on the 2008 Modified IWCLL NCI-WG criteria at any time during the study as assessed by investigator up through the completion of the 65-week disease response assessment after the start of venetoclax. Participants who did not respond were considered non-responders. (NCT03406156)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until the last participant completed Week 65 assessments (data cut-off date of 13 October 2021); overall median time on follow-up was up to 787 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab94.0
Obinutuzumab/Bendamustine88.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as number of days from the date of first dose of any study drug (either venetoclax, obinutuzumab, or bendamustine) to the date of death. If a participant had not died, their data was censored at the date when they were last known to be alive prior to the cutoff date.The distribution of OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. (NCT03406156)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until the last participant completed Week 65 assessments (data cut-off date of 13 October 2021); overall median time on follow-up was up to 787 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
ObinutuzumabNA
Obinutuzumab/BendamustineNA

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of any study drug (either venetoclax, obinutuzumab, or bendamustine) to the date of disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. All disease progression was to be included regardless whether the event occurred during or after the participant was taking any study drug. Progression-free survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology. (NCT03406156)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until the last participant completed Week 65 assessments (data cut-off date of 13 October 2021); overall median time on follow-up was up to 787 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Obinutuzumab23.3
Obinutuzumab/BendamustineNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Tumor Burden Status With Induction of Obinutuzumab or Obinutuzumab Plus Bendamustine (Debulking Period)

Low tumor burden is defined as absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) < 25 × 10^9 /L and all lymph nodes < 5 cm per computed tomography (CT) scans. (NCT03406156)
Timeframe: From Baseline to the end of Cycles 2, 4, and 6, up to approximately 24 weeks after initial dose of study drug

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
From Baseline to the End of Cycle 2From Baseline to the End of Cycle 4From Baseline to the End of Cycle 6
Obinutuzumab81.488.395.0
Obinutuzumab/Bendamustine83.987.190.3

[back to top]

Undetectable Minimal Residual Disease (UMRD) Rate

The level of MRD was assessed in the peripheral blood of all participants at 5 months after last dose of obinutuzumab, and at 3 months after last dose of venetoclax/end of treatment (including early study termination) to determine the rate of UMRD. Undetectable Minimal Residual Disease is defined as less than one CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes (< 10^-4 ). (NCT03406156)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until the last participant completed Week 65 assessments (data cut-off date of 13 October 2021)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
At Week 38At Week 65
Obinutuzumab10095.5
Obinutuzumab/Bendamustine100100

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

"Complete response rate is defined as the percentage of participants achieving complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi) as their best response based on 2008 Modified International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia National Cancer Institute-Working Group (IWCLL NCI-WG) criteria.~CR required all of the following:~Peripheral blood lymphocytes <4000/μL~Absence of lymphadenopathy by physical examination and computed tomography scan~No hepatomegaly or splenomegaly by physical examination~Absence of disease or constitutional symptoms (unexplained fevers >38°C, drenching night sweats, ≥10% weight loss in last 6 months)~Blood counts above the following:~Neutrophils >1500/μL~Platelets >100,000/μL~Hemoglobin >11.0 g/dL~Bone marrow at least normocellular for age, <30% lymphocytes~CRi was defined as participants with CR who had persistent cytopenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity." (NCT03406156)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until the last participant completed Week 65 assessments (data cut-off date of 13 October 2021); overall median time on follow-up was up to 787 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Obinutuzumab51.2
Obinutuzumab/Bendamustine16.7

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR = Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR)) of Subjects

-For definitions of CR and PR please refer to the Recommendations for Initial Evaluation, Staging and Response Assessment of Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: The Lugano Classification (NCT03623373)
Timeframe: Through completion of treatment (estimated to be 6 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine/Rituximab/Acalabrutinib/Cytarabine10

[back to top]

Pre-transplant Complete Response Rate

-For definitions of CR, please refer to the Recommendations for Initial Evaluation, Staging and Response Assessment of Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: The Lugano Classification (NCT03623373)
Timeframe: Through completion of treatment (estimated to be 6 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine/Rituximab/Acalabrutinib/Cytarabine9

[back to top]

Stem Cell Mobilization Success Rate With Cytarabine and Rituximab

-Stem cell mobilization success is defined as a yield of >2x10^6 CD34+ stem cells/kg with a maximum of 5 courses of apheresis (NCT03623373)
Timeframe: Through 5 courses of apheresis (up to 5 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine/Rituximab/Acalabrutinib/Cytarabine4

[back to top] [back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) at the End of Induction (EOI) Therapy

ORR at EOI therapy was defined as the percentage of particpants with either a CR, CR unconfirmed or PR at the EOI visit, as determined by the investigator and according to the guidelines used at the site. (NCT03817853)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of induction therapy (up to approximately 6 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial Response
All Participants72.119.1

[back to top]

Percentage of IRRs Regardless of Grade by Cycle

IRRs were defined as all adverse events (AEs) that occurred during or within 24 hours from the end of study treatment infusion and were judged as related to infusion of study treatment components by the investigator. (NCT03817853)
Timeframe: Within 24 hours from the end of study treatment infusion in all cycles, including maintenance ((1 cycle: 21 or 28 days depending on the chemotherapy selected); up to approximately 2.5 years)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 2Cycle 1 Day 8Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7
All Participants49.67.84.54.511.88.34.96.23.64.4

[back to top]

Type of Grade >=3 IRRs Associated With the Obinutuzumab Administered as an SDI by Cycle

(NCT03817853)
Timeframe: All cycles including maintenance (1 cycle: 21 or 28 days depending on the chemotherapy selected; up to approximately 2.5 years)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Cycle (C) 5- HypertensionC5 - Renal failureC5 - Weight increased
All Participants33.333.333.3

[back to top]

Duration (In Minutes) of Obinutuzumab Administration by Cycle

The duration of obinutuzumab administration (in minutes) by cycle was defined as the difference between the end time and the start time of obinutuzumab administration. (NCT03817853)
Timeframe: All cycles including maintenance (1 cycle: 21 or 28 days depending on the chemotherapy selected; up to approximately 2.5 years)

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Cycle(C) 1 Day(D) 1C1D8C1D15C2C3C4C5C6C7C8Maintenance Week 1Maintenance Week 9Maintenance Week 17Maintenance Week 25Maintenance Week 33Maintenance Week 41
All Participants295.96215.97207.52101.48102.9798.3398.2699.4999.5694.54101.4897.2197.6493.8392.5090.00

[back to top]

Duration of Grade >=3 IRRs Associated With the Obinutuzumab Administered as an SDI by Cycle

The duration, in minutes, of IRRs during all cycles, where obinutuzumab was administered as an SDI. (NCT03817853)
Timeframe: All cycles including maintenance (1 cycle: 21 or 28 days depending on the chemotherapy selected; up to approximately 2.5 years)

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
All Participants165.0

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant who was administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE was therefore any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Pre-existing conditions which worsened during the study, recurrence of an intermittent medical condition, deterioration in a laboratory value or other clinical test or were related to a protocol-mandated intervention were also considered AEs. Grading was completed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 5.0. (NCT03817853)
Timeframe: Baseline up to clinical cut off date (up to approximately 1.5 years)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
All Participants99.1
Maintenance: Obinutuzumab41.1
Follow-up35.3

[back to top]

Time to IRR From Infusion to Onset of the IRR During Cycle 2

Time to IRR (of any grade) in Cycle 2 was defined as the time from the start of infusion (i.e., start date/time of infusion of the first component of study treatment) in Cycle 2 to the onset of the IRR (of any grade) during Cycle 2. (NCT03817853)
Timeframe: From infusion to onset of IRR during Cycle 2 (1 cycle: 21 or 28 days depending on the chemotherapy selected)

InterventionHours (Mean)
All Participants11.800

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Positive Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Polatuzumab Vedotin

Treatment Emergent ADA is (a) negative or missing baseline ADA result(s) and at least one positive post-baseline ADA result, OR (b) positive ADA result at baseline and one or more post-baseline titer results that are at least 0.60 titer unit (t.u.) greater than the baseline titer result. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 39 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from date of randomization until the date of death from any cause. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 82 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab10.89
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab7.67

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product, any new disease or exacerbation of an existing disease (a worsening in the character, frequency, or severity of a known condition), recurrence of an intermittent medical condition not present at baseline, any deterioration in a laboratory value or other clinical test that is associated with symptoms or leads to a change in study treatment or concomitant treatment or discontinuation from study drug or adverse events that are related to a protocol-mandated intervention, including those that occur prior to assignment of study treatment. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 82 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab100
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Assessed by Investigator

BOR=CR/PR per PET-CT/CT by investigator per LRC.CR perPET-CT=complete MR in lymph nodes & extralymphatic sites(ELS),score=1,2,3 with/without residual mass on5PS,1=no uptake(UT)above background;2=UT≤mediastinum;3=UT>mediastinum but ≤liver;4=UT moderately>liver;5=UT markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions & FDG-avid disease absent in bone marrow.CR perCT=complete radiologic response with target nodes/nodal masses regressedto≤1.5 cm in LDi&no ELS of disease;absence of non-measured lesion;organ enlargement regressed to normal;no new lesions;bone marrow morphology=normal,if indeterminate,IHC negative.PR per PET-CT=partial MR in lymph nodes&ELS,score=4or5,reduced UT than baseline(BL)&residual masses=any size;no new lesions&residual UT >UT in normal marrow,reduced than BL.PR per CT by LCR=≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target nodes & extranodal sites;non-measured lesion=absent/normal,regressed,no increase;spleen=regressed by>50%in length beyond normal;no new lesions. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to every 6 months after end of treatment assessment until disease progression, study withdrawal, end of study, or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 82 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab53.6
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab28.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at the End of Treatment (EOT) Assessment Based on Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)

CR was determined by IRC according to the Lugano Response Criteria (LRC) for Malignant Lymphoma. Per LRC , CR based on PET-CT was defined as complete metabolic response (MR) in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5-point scale (5PS), where, 1= no uptake above background; 2 = uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3 = uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4 = uptake moderately > liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions and no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (1 cycle = 21 days) or after final dose of study treatment. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 23 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab25.0
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab14.3

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Antibody-Conjugated Monomethyl Auristatin E (acMMAE) at Specified Timepoints

PK of polatuzumab vedodtin-related analyte- acMMAE was measured. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Predose and post dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1, and post dose on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 3; predose and post dose on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 4; treatment completion/early discontinuation visit (each cycle = 21 days) up to approximately 19 weeks

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: Post doseCycle 1 Day 8 Post doseCycle 1 Day 15 Post doseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: Post doseCycle 3 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 3 Day 1: Post doseCycle 3 Day 8 Post doseCycle 3 Day 15 Post doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Post doseTreatment completion/Early discontinuation
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and RituximabNA56065.526.710.952414.660564.533.715.460210.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on PET-CT or CT Only as Assessed by IRC

BOR=CR/PR per PET-CT/CT by IRC per LRC. CR per PET-CT=complete MR in lymph nodes& ELS, score=1, 2,3 with/without residual mass on 5PS, 1=no UT above background; 2=UT≤mediastinum; 3=UT>mediastinum but ≤liver; 4=UT moderately>liver; 5=UT markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions & FDG-avid disease absent in bone marrow.CR per CT=complete radiologic response with target nodes/nodal masses regressed to≤1.5 cm in LDi and no ELS of disease; absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressed to normal; no new lesions; bone marrow morphology=normal, if indeterminate, IHC negative. PR per PET-CT=partial MR in lymph nodes & ELS, score =4 or 5,reduced UT than baseline(BL)&residual masses=any size; no new lesions &residual UT >UT in normal marrow, reduced than BL.PR per CT by LCR=≥50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target nodes& extranodal sites; non-measured lesion=absent/normal, regressed, no increase; spleen=regressed by>50% in length beyond normal; no new lesions. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to every 6 months after end of treatment assessment until disease progression, study withdrawal, end of study, or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 82 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab53.6
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab50.0

[back to top]

DOR Based on PET-CT/CT Only as Assessed by IRC

DOR was defined as time from first occurrence of a documented objective response to disease progression, relapse or death from any cause, as determined by IRC according to the LRC. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to every 6 months after end of treatment assessment until disease progression, study withdrawal, end of study, or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 82 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab8.74
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab4.27

[back to top]

Duration Of Response (DOR) Based on PET-CT/CT Only as Assessed by Investigator

DOR was defined as time from first occurrence of a documented objective response to disease progression, relapse or death from any cause, as determined by the investigator according to the LRC (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to every 6 months after end of treatment assessment until disease progression, study withdrawal, end of study, or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 82 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab5.45
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab4.34

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS) Based on PET-CT or CT Assessed by Investigator

EFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to any treatment failure including disease progression, relapse, initiation of new anti-lymphoma treatment (NALT), or death based on PET-CT or CT only, as determined by the investigator according to the LRC. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 82 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab4.83
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab2.00

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR at EOT Based on Computed Tomography (CT) as Assessed by Investigator

CR was determined by the investigator according to the LRC. Per LRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 centimeters (cm) in longest transverse diameter (LDi) and no extralymphatic sites of disease; absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow by morphology, if indeterminate, immunohistochemistry (IHC) negative. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (1 cycle = 21 days) or after final dose of study treatment. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 23 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab17.9
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR at EOT Based on CT as Assessed by IRC

CR was determined by the IRC according to the LRC. Per LRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi and no extralymphatic sites of disease; absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (1 cycle = 21 days) or after final dose of study treatment. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 23 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab17.9
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab0

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on PET-CT/CT Only as Assessed by Investigator

PFS was defined as the period from date of randomization until the date of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause based on PET-CT or CT only, as determined by the investigator according to the LRC. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 82 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab4.90
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab2.00

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR at the EOT Assessment Based on PET-CT as Assessed by Investigator

CR was determined by investigator according to the LRC for Malignant Lymphoma. Per LRC, CR based on PET-CT was defined as complete MR in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5PS, where, 1= no uptake above background; 2 = uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3 = uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4 = uptake moderately > liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (1 cycle = 21 days) or after final dose of study treatment. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to approximately to 23 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab21.4
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab14.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) at EOT Based on PET-CT as Assessed by Investigator

OR was defined as CR or partial response (PR) at the end of treatment assessment based on PET-CT, as determined by the investigator according to the LRC. CR based on PET-CT was defined as complete MR in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass on 5PS, where, 1= no uptake above background; 2 = uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3 = uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4 = uptake moderately > liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR based on PET-CT was defined as partial MR in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 4 or 5 with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size; no new lesions and residual uptake higher than uptake in normal bone marrow but reduced compared with baseline. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (1 cycle = 21 days) or after final dose of study treatment. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 23 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab28.6
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab14.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With OR at EOT Assessment Based on CT as Assessed by Investigator

OR was defined as CR or PR, at the EOT assessment based on CT only, as determined by the investigator according to the LRC. Per LRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi and no extralymphatic sites of disease; absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. Per LRC, PR was defined as ≥ 50% decrease in sum of the product of the perpendicular diameters (SPD) of up to 6 target nodes and extranodal sites; non-measured lesion is absent/normal, regressed, but no increase; spleen must have regressed by >50 % in length beyond normal; and no new lesions. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (1 cycle = 21 days) or after final dose of study treatment. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 23 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab32.1
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab14.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With OR at EOT Assessment Based on CT as Assessed by IRC

OR was defined as percentage of participants with CR or PR, at EOT assessment based on CT only, as determined by IRC according to the LRC. Per LRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi. PR is ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target nodes and extranodal sites. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1 (1 cycle = 21 days) or after final dose of study treatment. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 23 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab28.6
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab14.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With OR at EOT Based on PET-CT as Assessed by IRC

OR was defined as CR or PR at the end of treatment assessment based on PET-CT, as determined by the IRC according to the LRC. CR based on PET-CT was defined as complete MR in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass on 5PS, where, 1= no uptake above background; 2 = uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3 = uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4 = uptake moderately > liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR per PET-CT was defined as partial MR in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 4 or 5 with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size; no new lesions and residual uptake higher than uptake in normal marrow but reduced compared with baseline. The analysis was done 6-8 weeks after Cycle 6, Day 1(1 cycle= 21 days) or after final dose of study treatment.Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 23 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab35.7
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab14.3

[back to top]

PFS Based on PET-CT/CT Only as Assessed by IRC

PFS was defined as the period from date of randomization until the date of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause based on PET-CT or CT only, as determined by IRC according to the LRC. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 82 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab5.42
Placebo Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab6.01

[back to top]

Serum Concentration of Total Antibody at Specified Timepoints

PK of polatuzumab vedodtin-related analyte- total antibody was measured (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Predose & post dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1,& post dose on Days 8 & 15 of Cycles 1& 3; predose & post dose on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 & 4; treatment completion/early discontinuation visit; follow-up visits at Months 3 &6 (1 cycle=21 days) up to approx. 46 weeks

Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (μg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: Post doseCycle 1 Day 8 Post doseCycle 1 Day 15 Post doseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: Post doseCycle 3 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 3 Day 1: Post doseCycle 3 Day 8 Post doseCycle 3 Day 15 Post doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Post doseTreatment completion/Early discontinuationFollow-Up Month 3Follow-Up Month 6
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and RituximabNA41.59.835.423.1349.14.3045.613.68.485.3747.24.440.1820.0410

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Unconjugated Monomethyl Auristatin E (MMAE) at Specified Timepoints

PK of polatuzumab vedodtin-related analyte- unconjugated MMAE was measured. (NCT04236141)
Timeframe: Predose and post dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1, and post dose on Days 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 3; predose and post dose on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 4; treatment completion/early discontinuation visit (each cycle = 21 days) up to approximately 19 weeks

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2: Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 2: Post doseCycle 1 Day 8 Post doseCycle 1 Day 15 Post doseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: Post doseCycle 3 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 3 Day 1: Post doseCycle 3 Day 8 Post doseCycle 3 Day 15 Post doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Post doseTreatment completion/Early discontinuation
Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and RituximabNA0.1392.470.6270.08700.1270.09440.1711.490.5090.08510.1520.0711

[back to top]

Number of SAEs (Zandelisib When Combined With Rituximab)

Measured by the number of SAEs (NCT04745832)
Timeframe: 1 year 7 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab Plus Zandelisib12
Rituximab Plus Chemotherapy8

[back to top]

Number of Treatment Emergent AEs (Zandelisib When Combined With Rituximab)

Measured by the number of Treatment Emergent AEs (NCT04745832)
Timeframe: 1 year 7 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab Plus Zandelisib38
Rituximab Plus Chemotherapy37

[back to top]