tacrolimus and zotarolimus

Drug-eluting stents (DES) with antiproliferative drugs attached via polymers on the stent surface have reduced in-stent restenosis and repeat revascularization compared with bare metal stent (BMS) across nearly all lesion and patient subsets. However, the small number of patients with in-stent restenosis after DES treatment still exists. Furthermore, concerns about long-term safety of DES are raised, particularly regarding the higher-than-expected late-event thrombosis. There is no doubt that the DES will continue to play a pivotal role in the treatment of coronary artery disease, yet future designs need to incorporate features that reduce thrombosis and promote endothelialization along with maintaining the efficacy. This review focuses on novel generation of DES, discussing new programs, including new antiproliferative agents, novel polymeric and non polymeric stents.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Equipment Design; Everolimus; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus

Controversy exists about the clinical significance of in-stent late loss (ISLL) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. We sought to clarify whether ISLL after DES implantation is related to a potential clinical impact.. We included in a meta-regression analysis 21 trials (8641 patients) that randomly compared DES with bare-metal stents (BMS). We evaluated the relationship between angiographic behaviour of DES and the clinical impact of using DES instead of BMS in each trial using meta-regression techniques, weighting by the number of patients included in each trial. Mean ISLL in patients allocated to DES and DeltaISLL (difference in ISLL in patients allocated to BMS and DES) were used as angiographic parameters of efficacy of DES. The number of patients needed to be treated (NNT) to prevent one target lesion revascularization (TLR) was used to quantify the clinical impact of using DES instead of BMS. There was a significant relationship between mean ISLL in patients allocated to DES and the clinical benefit of using DES instead of BMS, as measured with the NNT for TLR: NNT for TLR = 6.2 + 18.4 [ISLL-DES] (R = 0.62; P = 0.007). Therefore, a 0.1 mm increase in mean ISLL-DES was associated with a 1.8 increase in NNT for TLR. There was also a significant association between the degree of inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia of DES in comparison with BMS with the NNT for TLR: NNT for TLR = 17.1-11.8 [DeltaISLL] (R = 0.61; P = 0.008). Therefore, a 0.1 mm reduction in ISLL by using DES instead of BMS was associated with a 1.2 decrease in mean NNT for TLR.. There is a strong and significant association between the degree of inhibition of neointimal formation with the use of DES and the clinical impact of using DES instead of BMS.

Topics: Coronary Restenosis; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Paclitaxel; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Stents; Tacrolimus; Tubulin Modulators

Drug eluting stents (DES) have been shown to reduce restenosis compared with bare metal stents in bifurcated lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with bifurcated lesions treated by 3 different DES.. Consecutive patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease on one bifurcated lesion with SB>2.25 mm (on visual estimation) undergoing at the Department of Cardiology of the Catholic University of Rome, Italy were screened. Patients treated with Sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher Select; SES Group), Tacrolimus-eluting stent (Taxus-Libertè; TA Group) and Zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor Driver; ZOT Group) were enrolled in the study. Clinical and angiographic characteristics of all patients were prospectively recorded. Major adverse clinical events (MACE), including death, acute myocardial infarction (MI) or target lesion revascularization (TVR) by either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary surgery were recorded during the follow-up. Incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis was calculated according to the ARC criteria.. Two hundred and forty-one consecutive patients were enrolled (89 Group CY, 98 Group TA and 54 Group EN). Length of follow-up was 235+/-60 days. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristic were similar across the groups. The adopted technique for stent implantation was provisional stenting (73.4%), T-stenting technique (7%), crush (7%) and V-stenting (2.6%). The rate of patients finally treated with two stents was similar among groups. The cumulative rate of MACE (9% SES, 12% TA, 11% ZOT: P=0.7) and of TVR (2% SES, 9% TA, 7% ZOT) was similar among groups. No definite stent thrombosis was observed during follow-up, while 1 probable stent thrombosis was observed in TA group.. The clinical outcome of bifurcated lesions using DES and mainly a technique of single stent implantation is good. In the present observational study, clinical adverse events did not differ in patients with bifurcated lesions treated by Cypher, Taxus or Endeavor stent implantation.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rome; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus; Treatment Outcome

To characterize in-stent restenosis after the implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), tacrolimus-eluting stents (TES), and zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), 25 patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES; 9 PES, 10 SES, 4 TES, and 2 ZES) and 19 with bare-metal stents (BMS) underwent directional coronary atherectomy for in-stent restenosis 4 to 36 months after implantation. Restenosis after DES implantation was more frequently focal and associated with smaller specimens compared to that after BMS implantation. Light and confocal microscopy were used. Histologic features were similar in DES and BMS. In-stent restenotic lesions were composed mainly of neointima containing proteoglycan-rich smooth muscle cells and fibrolipidic regions. Small inflammatory infiltrates were observed, mostly in patients with unstable angina; CD18- and/or CD3(+) cells were detected in patients with BMS and DES. Different smooth muscle cell phenotypes were observed: synthetic was more frequent with BMS and PES, intermediate with ZES, contractile or intermediate with SES, and contractile with TES. The mean proliferation index was low and comparable among stent types; cyclins B1 and D1 were expressed in all DES. In conclusion, intra-DES and intra-BMS restenotic tissue was composed mainly of smooth muscle cells with different phenotypes, proliferating at a low rate. The different smooth muscle cell phenotypes within the stent types might suggest different mechanisms of restenosis.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus; Treatment Outcome