tacrolimus and Stomatitis

To determine whether treatment with tacrolimus plus sirolimus (Tac/Sir) as a prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease worsens severe oral mucositis and delays healing compared to cyclosporine plus methotrexate (CsA/Mtx) following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.. The study comprised 141 patients: 73 randomized to receive Tac/Sir and 68 to receive CsA/Mtx. The oral mucositis assessment scale and toxicity grading according to WHO were used to assess the severity, peak and duration of oral mucositis from the day -3 to day 24 post-transplant.. Eighty-seven patients developed oral mucositis in the first 24 days post-transplant. No significant difference in oral mucositis severity between the Tac/Sir and CsA/Mtx groups was observed. The peak oral mucositis score occurred on day 10 in both groups. Although oral mucositis scores had returned to baseline in the CsA/Mtx group on day 24 post-transplant, no significant difference compared with the Tac/Sir group was found.. The introduction of tacrolimus/sirolimus as a graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation increased neither the incidence nor severity of oral mucositis compared with cyclosporine/methotrexate. Furthermore, oral mucositis healing was not prolonged and followed the same time pattern as cyclosporine/methotrexate.

Topics: Cyclosporine; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Methotrexate; Sirolimus; Stomatitis; Tacrolimus

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of single-agent dexamethasone or tacrolimus topical solution as first-line treatment for symptomatic oral chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). This was a prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized phase II trial of patients with symptomatic oral cGVHD without prior topical therapy. Subjects were randomly assigned 1:1 to either topical dexamethasone (.5 mg/mL) or tacrolimus (.5 mg/mL) solution and instructed to rinse with 5 mL for 5 minutes, 4 times a day, for 4 weeks. Oral cGVHD assessments (National Institutes of Health [NIH] criteria) were completed at baseline and end of treatment (NIH criteria, global response, and tolerability). The primary endpoint was the response rate defined as ≥3-point reduction in patient-reported sensitivity score (range, 0 to 10). A parallel 2-stage design was employed so that a less efficacious arm could be terminated early. The accrual goal was 60 evaluable patients; 30 in each arm), accruing 14 in the first stage and 16 in the second stage. If both arms were regarded as efficacious, a "pick-the-winner" method would be employed to choose a better treatment for future investigation. Forty-six subjects were randomized to receive either dexamethasone (n = 28) or tacrolimus (n = 18). Six subjects were excluded from the analysis because of changes in systemic immunosuppression (dexamethasone  = 1, tacrolimus  = 3) or lack of end-of-treatment visit (1 per arm). After the first stage evaluation, the tacrolimus arm was terminated because of lack of activity (3 of 14 responses; response rate, 21%). Twenty-six subjects in the dexamethasone arm completed both study visits and were included in the response analysis, with a 58% (15 of 26) response rate, compared with 21% (3 of 14) in the tacrolimus arm (P = .05). The response rates according to the NIH score in the dexamethasone and tacrolimus arms were 50% (13 of 26) and 2% (2 of 14), respectively (P = .04). From the onset of therapy, 31% versus 21% patients reported feeling "much better" and 38% versus 36% reported feeling "slightly better," giving an overall global response rate ("much better" or "slightly better") of 81% (21 of 26) versus 71% (10 of 14), in the dexamethasone and tacrolimus arms, respectively. Dexamethasone rinses were well tolerated and taste was reported as "very pleasant" or "tolerable" in most subjects (96%). Intensive topical therapy with dexamethasone solution is effective for man

Topics: Adult; Child; Child, Preschool; Dexamethasone; Female; Graft vs Host Disease; Humans; Male; Mouth Diseases; Stomatitis; Tacrolimus; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Grades 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurs in approximately 35% of matched, related donor (MRD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. We sought to determine if the combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus (Tac/Sir) was more effective than tacrolimus and methotrexate (Tac/Mtx) in preventing acute GVHD and early mortality after allogeneic MRD HCT in a phase 3, multicenter trial. The primary end point of the trial was to compare 114-day grades 2-4 acute GVHD-free survival using an intention-to-treat analysis of 304 randomized subjects. There was no difference in the probability of day 114 grades 2-4 acute GVHD-free survival (67% vs 62%, P = .38). Grades 2-4 GVHD was similar in the Tac/Sir and Tac/Mtx arms (26% vs 34%, P = .48). Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were more rapid in the Tac/Sir arm (14 vs 16 days, P < .001; 16 vs 19 days, P = .03). Oropharyngeal mucositis was less severe in the Tac/Sir arm (peak Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale score 0.70 vs 0.96, P < .001), but otherwise toxicity was similar. Chronic GVHD, relapse-free survival, and overall survival at 2 years were no different between study arms (53% vs 45%, P = .06; 53% vs 54%, P = .77; and 59% vs 63%, P = .36). Based on similar long-term outcomes, more rapid engraftment, and less oropharyngeal mucositis, the combination of Tac/Sir is an acceptable alternative to Tac/Mtx after MRD HCT. This study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Cancer Institute; and the trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00406393.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Allografts; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Stomatitis; Survival Rate; Tacrolimus; Time Factors

Topics: Administration, Topical; Chronic Disease; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Hydroxychloroquine; Immunosuppressive Agents; Stomatitis; Tacrolimus

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a curable treatment for hematological diseases. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) causes morbidity and mortality after HSCT. Methotrexate (MTX) is used for GVHD prophylaxis, but its appropriate dose remains unclear. In the present study, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of 15-10-10 MTX (day +1: 15 mg/m(2); days +3 and +6: 10 mg/m(2)) with 10-7-7 MTX (day +1: 10 mg/m(2); day +3 and +6: 7 mg/m(2)) in combination with tacrolimus. The cumulative incidence rates of grades II-IV acute GVHD, grades III-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD in the 15-10-10 MTX and 10-7-7 MTX groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent. The median time for neutrophil engraftment in the 15-10-10 MTX group was 16 days (range, 11-31 days), while that in the 10-7-7 group was 15 days (range, 12-19 days) (P = 0.024). Moreover, the median time for platelet recovery was significantly shorter in the 10-7-7 MTX group (22 days; range, 13-49 days) than that in the 15-10-10 MTX group (27 days; range, 9-405 days) (P = 0.027). The duration of oral mucositis was significantly shorter in the patients who received a reduced dose of MTX (median, 4.5 vs 13.0 days; P = 0.013). In conclusion, GVHD prophylaxis with a reduced dose of MTX was associated with earlier engraftment and earlier recovery from mucositis in comparison to a standard dose of MTX, without affecting the incidence of GVHD.

Topics: Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Graft Survival; Graft vs Host Disease; Humans; Incidence; Methotrexate; Stomatitis; Tacrolimus; Time Factors

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Colectomy; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colonic Neoplasms; Fatal Outcome; Humans; Male; Pyoderma; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Stomatitis; Tacrolimus; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Stomatitis; Suppuration; Tacrolimus

Oral mucositis occurs in up to 75% of recipients of high-dose chemoradiotherapy conditioning regimens used for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). As a result of mucositis, narcotic analgesia and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) are commonly required after HSCT. Methotrexate, an antiproliferative graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis agent, impairs mucosal regeneration and worsens and prolongs mucositis. We assessed the effect of substituting sirolimus for methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis on outcomes associated with mucositis. Two patient cohorts undergoing allogeneic HLA-matched related donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation conditioning were prospectively analyzed for mucositis severity and retrospectively reviewed for correlative outcomes. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of sirolimus/tacrolimus (ST) in the study group and tacrolimus/methotrexate (TM) in the control group. Thirty patients received ST and 24 patients received TM as GVHD prophylaxis between October 2000 and May 2003. Mild, moderate, and severe mucositis was noted in 37%, 57%, and 7% of the ST group and 8%, 42%, and 50% of the TM group (P = .0002). Less TPN was used in the ST group than the TM group (17% versus 43% of posttransplantation hospital days; P = .02). The total number of narcotic days was lower in the ST group in comparison with the TM group (median, 13.5 versus 17 days; P = .08). The time to first hospital discharge was shorter in the ST group compared with the TM group (median, 18 versus 22 days; P = .07). The substitution of sirolimus for methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis is associated with a reduction in mucositis severity. As a result, TPN and narcotic use are reduced, and hospitalization duration is shortened. Less toxic GVHD prophylaxis regimens without methotrexate may have a significant effect on patient quality of life, patient outcomes, and economic outcomes associated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Topics: Adult; Cohort Studies; Drug Evaluation; Female; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Mouth Mucosa; Premedication; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Stomatitis; Tacrolimus; Transplantation, Homologous; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Middle Aged; Paraneoplastic Syndromes; Pemphigus; Recurrence; Stomatitis; Tacrolimus